natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Priloge II , III in IV se lahko prilagodijo znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku v skladu s postopkom iz člena 21(2) Direktive 2000/60/ES in ob upoštevanju obdobja pregledovanja in posodabljanja načrta upravljanja povodij, kakor je določeno v členu 13(7) navedene direktive.
Annexes II, III and IV may be adapted to scientific and technical progress in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 21(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC, taking into consideration the period for reviewing and updating river basin management plans, as referred to in Article 13(7) of that Directive.
Del A Priloge II ter Prilogi III in IV se lahko prilagodijo znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku v skladu s postopkom iz člena 21(2) Direktive 2000/60/ES in ob upoštevanju obdobja pregledovanja in posodabljanja načrta upravljanja povodij, kakor je določeno v členu 13(7) navedene direktive.
Part A of Annex II and Annexes III and IV may be adapted to scientific and technical progress in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 21(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC, taking into consideration the period for reviewing and updating river basin management plans, as referred to in Article 13(7) of that Directive.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 55 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 55 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Del A bi bilo treba obravnavati v postopku komitologije, del B ne.
Part A should be covered by the comitology procedure, but Part B should not.
Del B Priloge II, ki ga je Svet preoblikoval, vsebuje seznam snovi, za katere morajo države članice določiti vsaj standarde kakovosti podzemne vode (mejne vrednosti).
Part B of Annex II, which the Council has reworded, contains the list of substances for which the Member States must at least lay down groundwater quality standards (threshold values).
Ta seznam se ne more spremeniti s postopkom komitologije, ampak le v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe, na podlagi soodločanja z Evropskim parlamentom .
That list cannot be amended using the comitology procedure, but only in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty, on the basis of codecision with Parliament.
Svet pripravi skupno metodologijo za razvrščanje vodonosnikov za pripravo na izvajanje programa Inspire.
The Council shall establish a common methodology for cataloguing aquifers in preparation for the implementation of the Inspire programme.
V zvezi s tem začnejo države članice zbirati podatke takoj, ko začne veljati ta direktiva.
In this connection the Member States shall begin to collect data as soon as this Directive comes into force.
Treba je izdelati metodologijo za zbiranje podatkov za pripravo na uvedbo programa Inspire (glede digitalnega zapisovanja teles podzemne vode), ki jo trenutno obravnava Parlament.
A methodology for the collection of data must be established in preparation for the introduction of the Inspire programme (concerning the digital recording of groundwater bodies) which is currently proceeding through Parliament.
Iz tega razloga morajo države članice sodelovati pri metodologiji zbiranja podatkov.
For this reason the Member States must become involved in the data-collection methodology.
Člen 10, odstavka 1 a in 1 b (novo)
Article 10, paragraphs 1 a and 1 b (new)
Komisija pripravi poročilo, v katerem za vsako državo članico posebej presodi, ali je izvajanje direktive povzročilo različne ravni varstva okolja, poslabšanje podzemne vode in izkrivljanje konkurence.
The Commission shall draw up a report assessing in particular, in respect of each Member State, whether implementation of the Directive has given rise to differing levels of environmental protection, instances of deterioration of groundwater or distortions of competition.
Na podlagi sklepov tega poročila Komisija do 31. decembra 2015 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu po potrebi predloži predlog.
On the basis of the conclusions of that report, the Commission shall if necessary submit a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council by 31 December 2015.
Priloga I, točka 1, tabela, stolpec 3, vrstica 1, Opomba
Annex I, point 1, table, column 3, row 1, Comment
1 Ta določba ne zajema dejavnosti, ki so izven področja uporabe Direktive 91/676/EGS.
1 Activities outside the scope of Directive 91/676/EEC are not covered by this provision.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 60 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 60 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Ta opomba lahko skupaj z opombo pod črto pomeni, da se gospodarskim sektorjem postavljajo različne zahteve v zvezi z onesnaževanjem z nitrati.
Taken in conjunction with the footnote, this comment could mean that differing demands are made on economic sectors with regard to pollution by nitrates.
To je predmet kritike tako Evropskega parlamenta kot nekaterih držav članic.
This is the subject of criticism by both Parliament and some Member States.
Ta opomba prinaša pravno negotovost.
This comment creates legal uncertainty.
Priloga I, točka 1, tabela, stolpec 3, vrstica 2, Opomba (novo)
Annex I, point 1, table, column 3, row 2, Comment (new)
Standard kakovosti se uporablja za vsa telesa podzemne vode, razen v primerih, ko so standardi za pitno vodo glede pesticidov in njihovih ustreznih metabolitov strožji od 0,1 µg/l.
The quality standard applies to all bodies of groundwater, except where drinking water standards for pesticides and their relevant metabolites are more stringent than 0,1 µg/l.
Skupna koncentracija pesticidov in njihovih metabolitov v vseh podzemnih vodnih telesih ne sme presegati 0,5 µg/l.
The total concentration of pesticides and their metabolites in all groundwater bodies shall not exceed 0,5 µg/l.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 62, ki ga je Evropski parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 62 adopted by the EP in first reading.
Standardi kakovosti za pesticide/metabolite v pitni vodi so lahko nižji od 0,1 µg/l.
Quality standards for pesticides/metabolites in drinking water might be less than 0.1 µg/l.
Direktiva 98/83/ES določa mejno vrednost za skupno vsoto pesticidov in z njimi povezanih snovi.
Directive 98/83/EC sets a threshold value for the sum of pesticides and related substances.
Tudi to mejno vrednost bi bilo treba vključiti v direktivo, da bi zagotovili ustrezno zaščito podzemne vode.
This threshold should be included in this Directive as well, in order to ensure proper protection of the groundwater.
Priloga I, točka 1, tabela, opomba pod črto 3
Annex I, point 1, table, footnote 3
3 "Vsota" pomeni seštevek vseh posameznih pesticidov, ugotovljenih in izmerjenih v postopku spremljanja stanja.
3 ‘Total’ means the sum of all individual pesticides detected and quantified in the monitoring procedure.
3 "Vsota" pomeni seštevek vseh posameznih pesticidov, ugotovljenih in izmerjenih v postopku spremljanja stanja , vključno z njihovimi ustreznimi metaboliti ter razgradnimi in reakcijskimi produkti .
3 ‘Total’ means the sum of all individual pesticides detected and quantified in the monitoring procedure , including their relevant metabolites, degradation and reaction products .
Novo besedilo Sveta; brez tega dodatka bi lahko prišlo do napačnega razumevanja besedila opombe.
New Council text; without this addition, the text of the footnote could be misunderstood.
Priloga II, del B, točka 1
Annex II, Part B, point 1
Snovi ali ioni, ki se lahko pojavljajo naravno in kot posledica človekovih dejavnosti
Substances or ions which may occur both naturally and as a result of human activities
Kazalci, ki so lahko tako naravo prisotni kot tudi posledica človekovih dejavnosti
Indicators which may occur both naturally and as a result of human activities
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 90 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 90 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Jasno bi bilo treba izraziti, da klorid in sulfat nista onesnaževali.
It should be made clear that chloride and sulphate are not pollutants.
Priloga III, točka 4 (-a) (novo)
Annex III, point 4 (-a) (new)
(-a) učinek onesnaževal v podzemni vodi;
(-a) the impact of the pollutants in the groundwater body
To je predpogoj za veljavnost zahtev iz točk od (a) do (d).
This is the precondition if the requirements laid down in letters (a) to (d) are to be valid.
Priloga IV, del B, uvodni del
Annex IV, Part B, introductory part
V skladu s členom 5 države članice pri ugotovljenem pomembnem in stalno naraščajočem trendu trend obrnejo, če ta ogroža povezane vodne ekosisteme, neposredno odvisne kopenske ekosisteme, zdravje ljudi ali – obstoječe ali potencialne – legitimne rabe vodnega okolja, pri čemer se upoštevajo naslednje zahteve:
According to Article 5, Member States will reverse identified significant and sustained upward trends where these trends present a risk of harm to associated aquatic ecosystems, to directly dependent terrestrial ecosystems, to human health or to actual or potential legitimate uses of the water environment , taking into account the following requirements:
V skladu s členom 5 države članice pri ugotovljenem pomembnem in stalno naraščajočem trendu trend obrnejo, pri čemer se upoštevajo naslednje zahteve:
According to Article 5, Member States will reverse identified significant and sustained upward trends taking into account the following requirements:
Priloga IV, del B, točka 1 (c)
Annex IV, Part B, point 1 (c)
(c) sta stopnja povečanja in obrat trenda takšna, da bi višja izhodiščna točka za ukrepe za obrat trenda še vedno lahko zagotovila ukrepe, ki bi preprečili ali ublažili, kolikor je to mogoče, vsako okoljsko pomembno poslabšanje kakovosti podzemne vode na cenovno najbolj učinkovit način.
(c) the rate of increase and the reversibility of the trend are such that a later starting point for trend reversal measures would still enable such measures to prevent most cost-effectively, or at least mitigate as far as possible, any environmentally significant detrimental changes in groundwater quality.
V skladu s previdnostnim načelom ta izjema ni sprejemljiva (glej tudi obrazložitev predloga spremembe 28).
In keeping with the precautionary principle, this exception is unacceptable (see also justification for Amendment 28).
Ob odkritju nevarnosti je treba brezpogojno sprejeti ukrepe.
There can be no question of a risk being recognised and no measures taken.
Priloga IV, del B, točka 1, pododstavek 2
Annex IV, Part B, point 1, subparagraph 2
Za dejavnosti iz področja uporabe Direktive 91/676/EGS velja, da se izhodiščna točka za izvedbene ukrepe za obrat pomembnih in stalno naraščajočih trendov določi v skladu z navedeno direktivo in Direktivo 2000/60/ES.
For activities falling within the scope of Directive 91/676/EEC, the starting point for implementing measures to reverse significant and sustained upward trends will be established in accordance with that Directive and with Directive 2000/60/EC;
Priloga IV obravnava obrat trenda, ki je pomemben previdnostni instrument.
Annex IV deals with trend reversal, which represents an important precautionary instrument.
Za vse zadevne gospodarske sektorje bi morala veljati ista pravila (glej tudi obrazložitev predloga spremembe Priloge I, tabela, stolpec 3, Opomba).
The same rules should apply to all the economic sectors concerned (see also justification for the amendment to Annex I, table, column 3, Comment).
V skladu s predlogom spremembe 36 poročevalke in predlogom spremembe 60 Evropskega parlamenta, sprejetim v prvi obravnavi 28. aprila 2005.
Consistent with Rapporteur's amendment 36 and EP amendment 60, adopted at first reading on 28th April 2005.
Evropski parlament je na podlagi dolgih razprav in strokovnih pojasnil od začetka veljavnosti okvirne direktive o vodah pričakoval boljšo direktivo za varstvo podzemne vode, ki bi zagotovila jasno, ciljno usmerjeno in za izvajanje primerno ureditev.
Following the lengthy discussions held and the clearer understanding of the problem gained since the entry into force of the water framework directive, Parliament had been expecting a better directive on groundwater protection which lays down clear, effective provisions geared to specific objectives.
Po mnenju Evropskega parlamenta predlog Komisije in skupno stališče Sveta ne izpolnjujeta zahtev iz člena 17 Direktive 2000/60/ES.
In Parliament’s view, neither the Commission proposal nor the Council’s common position fulfils the remit issued in Article 17 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Bistvene kritike Evropskega parlamenta so:
Parliament’s main criticisms can be summarised as follows:
– Skupno stališče vključuje le majhne bistvene izboljšave za varstvo podzemne vode v primerjavi z veljavnimi predpisi okvirne direktive o vodah (2000/60/ES) v povezavi z Direktivo Sveta 80/68/EGS z dne 17. decembra 1979 o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem z določenimi nevarnimi snovmi, ki pa velja le še do leta 2013 .
- The common position contains only minor substantive improvements in the area of groundwater protection by comparison with the existing legislation, i.e. the water framework directive (2000/60/EC) taken in conjunction with Council Directive 80/68/EEC of 17 December 1979 on the protection of groundwater against pollution caused by certain dangerous substances, which will not remain in force beyond 2013 , however.
– Podzemna voda kot samostojni ekosistem se ne upošteva.
- The issue of groundwater as an independent ecosystem is ignored.
– Zato zahteve za varstvo podzemne vode tudi niso usmerjene v ohranjanje čim naravnejše podzemne vode.
- As a result, the groundwater protection requirements are not geared to maintaining groundwater in the most natural state possible.
– Dobra kakovost pitne vode iz podzemne vode, ki se jo lahko v mnogih delih Evrope pridobiva tako rekoč neposredno od izvira brez prečiščevanja, tako ni več zagotovljena.
- The good quality of drinking water from groundwater, which in many parts of Europe can be supplied direct from source without treatment, can therefore no longer be guaranteed.
– Odstopa se od načela celovitega in preventivnega varstva podzemne vode, utrjuje pa se varstvo podzemne vode po delih na podlagi receptorjev.
- The principle of comprehensive and preventive groundwater protection has been abandoned, and that of receptor-based, piecemeal groundwater protection is now set in stone.
– Ni jasnega razlikovanja med preventivo in odpravljanjem posledic.
- No clear distinction is drawn between prevention and restoration.
Najpomembnejše področje urejanja hčerinske direktive o podzemni vodi mora biti preventiva, tj., da novi vnosi ne smejo takoj spet postati primeri za sanacijo (stara ekološka bremena).
The key area covered by the groundwater daughter directive must be prevention, i.e. new inputs must not be allowed to turn into long-term problems requiring large-scale restoration measures.
– Državam članicam je omogočen velik obseg presoje, zlasti pri oceni stanja podzemne vode, pobudah za obrat naraščajočega trenda onesnaževanja in določanju izhodiščne točke za obrat trenda.
- Significant matters are left to the discretion of the Member States, in particular when it comes to assessing the chemical status of groundwater, laying down the criteria for the reversal of upward trends in concentrations of pollutants and to defining starting points for trend reversals.
– S tem je že na začetku preprečeno homogeno izvajanje okvirne direktive o vodah ter tudi te hčerinske direktive , npr. ureditve v zvezi s trendi.
- This approach in itself rules out the uniform implementation of the provisions - e.g. concerning the identification and reversal of trends - of both the water framework directive and this daughter directive .
– Prav tako je s tem otežena ali onemogočena primerljivost mejnih vrednosti in ocene stanja podzemne vode ter možnih zaščitnih ali sanacijskih ukrepov za celotno EU tudi v sicer primerljivih razmerah.
- It also runs counter to or rules out the comparability at EU level of the threshold values, assessments of the chemical status of groundwater and possible protection or restoration measures, even in cases where other circumstances are in fact similar.
– Največja težava podzemne vode, ugotovljena s pregledom stanja, in sicer onesnaženost z nitrati, je skoraj izključno prepuščena direktivi o nitratih.
- The task of dealing with the most serious groundwater problem brought to light by the inventory - nitrate pollution of groundwater - is left almost exclusively to the nitrates directive.
– Razen tega je uporabljenih veliko neopredeljenih pojmov in dejstev, skupno stališče pa je v nekaterih delih težko razumljivo in nenazorno.
- In addition, many undefined concepts and descriptions are employed and some passages of the common position are vague and difficult to understand.
– Natančne opredelitve načela, da se dobro kemijsko stanje podzemne vode v izhodišču ocenjuje na podlagi standardov kakovosti, zahtevane v členu 17 okvirne direktive o vodah, ni.
- Clarification of the principle that the assessment of the good chemical status of groundwater should be carried out on the basis of quality standards, as called for in Article 17 of the water framework directive, has not come about.
Tudi merila za določitev nacionalnih mejnih vrednosti so premalo konkretna, da bi nastala primerljiva ureditev odpravljanja posledic ali ravni zaščite kot pri površinskih vodah, čeprav je podzemna voda naš največji vodni vir in dejanska zaloga pitne vode.
By the same token, the criteria for establishing national threshold values are so vague as to rule out the establishment of comparable restoration provisions or protection levels, as has been achieved in the case of surface water, even though groundwater represents our largest body of water and our real drinking water reserve .
Zlasti zaradi dejstva, da je državam članicam dovoljen velik obseg presoje, se postavlja vprašanje, zakaj je hčerinska direktiva o podzemni vodi v obliki tega skupnega stališča kot evropska zakonodaja potrebna.
The very fact that significant matters are left to the discretion of the Member States raises the question of why the groundwater daughter directive, in the form set out in this common position, is necessary as an item of European legislation.
Besedilo, ki je pogosto nejasno in potrebno razlage, se ne sklada niti z načelom „boljše zakonodaje“, po katerem bi se morala ravnati evropska zakonodaja, ne pomeni poenostavitve zakonodaje in resnično ne spodbuja primernega izvajanja v državah članicah.
Moreover, the many vague wordings requiring further interpretation employed in the common position are not consistent with the principle of better regulation, will not lead to any simplification of Community legislation and will certainly not make for effective implementation in the Member States.
Pozitivna stran skupnega stališča je, da je obveznost določanja nacionalnih mejnih vrednosti za snovi iz dela B Priloge II za države članice določen pritisk, ki jih spodbuja k dejavnosti.
One welcome feature of the common position is that the requirement to lay down national threshold values for the substances listed in Annex II, Part B, will put pressure on the Member States to take action.
Izkušnje z izvajanjem direktive o nitratih s strani držav članic pa žal kažejo, da se lahko to upanje pogosto uresniči le z zamudnimi in dolgotrajnimi postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev proti državam članicam.
Regrettably, the experience gained with the transposition by the Member States of the nitrates directive shows that it often takes lengthy and difficult infringement proceedings against the Member States to make that hope a reality.
Evropski parlament zato meni, da so za sprejetje skupnega stališča nujno potrebne nadaljnje izboljšave, ki so izražene v predlogih sprememb.
If it is to accept the common position, Parliament therefore regards further improvements, as set out in the amendments, as essential.
1) Ekosistem podzemne vode v povezavi z varstvenimi cilji
(1) The protection objectives and groundwater as an ecosystem
V novi direktivi o podzemni vodi je treba v celoti upoštevati pristop v zvezi z emisijami iz stare direktive o podzemni vodi (80/68/EGS), da se zagotovi previdnostna ureditev na področju varstva podzemne vode in tako prepreči ali omeji poslabšanje podzemne vode z novimi vnosi.
The emissions-related approach taken in the old groundwater directive (80/68/EEC) must be fully incorporated into the new directive with a view to ensuring that groundwater protection is based on the precautionary principle, involving measures to prevent or limit the deterioration of groundwater by means of new inputs.
Cilj člena 4 Direktive 2000/60/ES je, da se ekosistem podzemne vode kot tak varuje pred onesnaževanjem in poslabšanjem.
The aim of Article 4 of Directive 2000/60/EC is to protect the ecosystem groundwater as such against pollution and deterioration.
S tem je tesno povezana jasnost uporabljenih pojmov .
That approach is closely bound up with the issue of the clarity of the concepts employed .
Prepoved poslabšanja, ki jo zahteva okvirna direktiva o vodah, je treba dosledneje izvajati.
The ban on deterioration called for in the water framework directive must be enforced more effectively.
Zato je tudi pomembno, da se v členu 2 te direktive opredeli pojem „poslabšanje“.
With that aim in view, it is also important that the concept of ‘deterioration’ should be defined in Article 2 of this directive.
S tem bodo razložene pojmovne razlike med onesnaževanjem in poslabšanjem, ki tudi v Direktivi 2000/60/ES nista dovolj jasno razlikovana.
This will serve to clarify the conceptual confusion between pollution and deterioration, clarification which Directive 2000/60/EC has failed properly to bring about.
To velja tudi za določbo člena 6(1)(b).
This also applies to the provisions set out in Article 6(1)(b).
Besedilo skupnega stališča bi snovem iz Priloge VIII k Direktivi 2000/60/ES omogočalo dodajanje v podzemno vodo z novimi posrednimi vnosi, dokler ne bi bila dosežena meja slabega kemijskega stanja .
In the case of the pollutants listed in Annex VIII to Directive 2000/60/EC, the wording employed in the common position would allow for groundwater to be topped up by means of new, indirect inputs until the poor chemical status threshold has been reached.
Evropski parlament se je z več predlogi sprememb proti temu izrekel že na prvi obravnavi.
Already at first reading, Parliament tabled a number of amendments seeking to change that approach.
Čeprav ta onesnaževala predstavljajo obstoječe ali potencialno tveganje onesnaževanja, bi ta ureditev dopustila nevarnost nastajanja novih primerov za sanacijo (stara ekološka bremena).
Although these pollutants ‘present an existing or potential risk of pollution’, this provision might give rise to new long-term problems requiring restoration measures.
To ne ustreza strogemu previdnostnemu pristopu in je v nasprotju s prepovedjo neposrednega odvajanja iz člena 11(3)(j) Direktive 2000/60/ES in s členom 6(1)(a) skupnega stališča.
This is not consistent with a strict precautionary approach and runs counter to the direct ban on discharges laid down in Article 11(3)(j) of Directive 2000/60/EC and to Article 6(1)(a) of the common position.
Za izvajanje bi to pomenilo: neposredno odvajanje teh onesnaževal je prepovedano, dovoljeno pa je pronicanje skozi prehod v tleh ne glede na stanje tal.
The implications for the implementation of the directive would be as follows: direct discharges of such pollutants are banned, but seepage through a passage in the ground, irrespective of soil conditions, would be allowed.
3) Razmerje med direktivami za varstvo voda in direktive o nitratih
(3) Relationship between the groundwater protection directives and the nitrates directive