natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
b) kompleksnost pravil označevanja, potrjevanja kakovosti in trženja v EU, ki se mora soočati z nasilnimi tržnimi strategijami držav proizvajalk iz "novega sveta", v katerih veljajo prožnejša pravila;
(b) The complexity of the labelling, quality certification and marketing rules of the EU which has to counter aggressive commercial strategies pursued by ‘New World’ producer countries which have more flexible rules.
c) postopno zmanjševanje potrošnje, zlasti namiznega vina, za približno 0,65 % letno na svetovni ravni;
(c) The gradual decline in consumption, chiefly of table wines, by approximately 0.65 % annually worldwide.
d) konkurenčnost uvoženega vina na notranjem trgu kot posledica globalizacije in dvostranskih trgovinskih sporazumov, ki jih je sklenila EU.
(d) Competition from imported wines in the internal market as a result of increased globalisation and the bilateral commercial agreements concluded by the EU.
Od leta 1996 se je uvoz vina povečal za 10 % letno, kar je znatno hitreje od njegovega izvoza, in je leta 2005 dosegel 11,8 milijonov hektolitrov.
Since 1996, wine imports have increased at a rate of 10 % annually, i.e. markedly more rapidly than its exports, and amounted to 11.8 million hectolitres in 2005.
Kljub temu uvoženo vino predstavlja samo 5 do 6 % celotne proizvodnje v Skupnosti;
Of course, imports represent only between 5 and 6 % of total Community output.
e) večja konkurenca na mednarodnem trgu, saj je izvoz evropskih kakovostnih vin tržno prodoren predvsem v razvitih državah z visoko kupno močjo, medtem ko so namizna vina, kljub izvoznim subvencijam za nekatera tržišča, podvržena konkurenci vin iz "novega sveta" ali pa so usmerjena na trge z zelo majhno kupno močjo;
(e) Increased competition on the international market, given that exports of European quality wines have commercial penetration chiefly in developed countries with substantial purchasing power, while table wines, despite the support they receive from export subsidies for certain commercial destinations, face competition from ‘New World’ wines or are channelled to markets with very limited purchasing power.
g) neprilagojenost velikega dela evropske proizvodnje širšemu povpraševanju potrošnikov z različnimi kulturnimi in potrošniškimi standardi, ki imajo večjo izbiro pri nakupih, zlasti z dostopom do trgovskih verig;
(g) The failure of a large portion of European production to adjust to broader demand from a consumer public with different cultural and consumer standards which has greater purchasing choice owing to its access mainly to commercial chains.
h) kriza na trgih se odraža v znižanju cen in prihodkov v vinogradništvu; ne glede na velike razlike med območji in proizvedenimi vini so se prihodki od leta 1999, za katerega so bile značilne zelo visoke cene za proizvajalce, do leta 2003, ko je bil proizvodni donos zelo visok, v povprečju zmanjšali za 12%.
(h) Market crises resulting in adverse trends in prices and incomes for vineyards; despite great divergences between regions and the wines produced, these incomes fell on average by 12 % from 1999, a year characterised by particularly high prices for producers, to 2003, a year with high production yields.
Predlogi Komisije v glavnem spreminjajo finančne posege skupne ureditve trga za vino v sklop strukturnih posegov in tržnih mehanizmov "à la carte" v okviru nacionalnih sredstev in drugega stebra skupne kmetijske politike (SKP), to je razvoja kmetijstva.
The Commission proposals essentially convert the financial interventions of the CMO in wine into a package of à la carte structural interventions and market mechanisms within the framework of national dossiers and the second pillar of the CAP i.e. agricultural development.
Poleg tega sta prenos sredstev s prvega na drugi steber SKP in sofinanciranje z nacionalnimi sredstvi preko programov razvoja podeželja, ukrepov za stabiliziranje trga in zmanjšanje proizvodne zmogljivosti vinskega sektorja nezdružljiva s katerim koli pristopom, katerega cilj je sektorju zagotoviti zanesljivo prihodnost in vzpostaviti pravila o konkurenci, ki bodo spoštovala temeljna načela zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Furthermore, the transfer of resources from pillar I to pillar II of the CAP and co-funding with national resources through the rural development programmes, measures to stabilise the market and to reduce the productive potential in the wine sector are contrary to any approach which seeks to ensure a viable future for the sector and to establish rules of competition which respect the basic principles of Community law itself.
Predlog Komisije je pravzaprav usmerjen k postopni slabitvi prvega stebra in odpravi enotnih politik, kar pomeni slabljenje in deregulacijo celotnega vinskega sektorja.
The Commission proposal seeks essentially gradually to weaken pillar I and to dismantle the uniform policies, thereby weakening and deregulating the entire wine sector.
Poleg tega obstaja nevarnost, da bo to povzročilo težave na nacionalni ravni, ko se bodo sredstva iz programov razvoja podeželja porazdelila med posamezne sektorje, ker bodo drugi kmetijski sektorji prikrajšani za sredstva, s katerimi se bo pokril del strukturnih posegov v vinskem sektorju.
Furthermore, there is a risk that problems will arise at national level when resources are distributed to individual sectors in the rural development programmes, because other agricultural sectors will be deprived of funds so as to enable part of the structural interventions in the wine sector to be covered.
Jasno je, da bo destabilizacija sektorja v enem vinogradniškem območju posredno povzročila težave pri uravnoteženju ponudbe in povpraševanja ter promociji vina v ostalih vinogradniških območjih.
It should be made clear that a destabilisation of the sector in one wine-producing region will indirectly create problems for the balance between supply and demand and the promotion of wine in other wine-producing regions.
Za vinski sektor so značilne občutne razlike v izvajanju politik Skupnosti, zlasti v zakonski ureditvi ponudbe in povpraševanja, prestrukturiranju, krčenju, razvrstitvi in označevanju vin, spodbujevalni politiki, destilaciji, obstoju ali neobstoju legalnih nasadov ter vlogi organizacij proizvajalcev in medstrokovnih organizacij.
The wine sector is characterised by glaring divergences in the implementation of Community policies, notably as regards the regulation of supply and demand, restructuring, grubbing-up, the classification and labelling of wines, promotion policy, distillation, the existence of ‘non-legalised’ plantings and the role of producers and interprofessional organisations.
Če v prvi fazi ne bo doseženo ravnotežje med ponudbo in povpraševanjem na ravni Skupnosti, se bo trg še vedno srečeval s težavami, povezanimi s proizvodnjo vina v vseh območjih.
Unless a balance is struck between supply and demand at Community level in the first phase, problems will continue in the market which will continue to be affected by the production of wine in all regions.
Ne da bi spregledali nacionalne in regionalne posebnosti, ki evropskemu vinu med drugim dajejo tudi kulturni značaj, je treba že od vsega začetka določiti cilje zgoraj omenjenih horizontalnih politik ter tako preprečiti destabilizacijo vinogradniških območij in doseči ravnotežje med ponudbo in povpraševanjem, ne da bi to povzročilo ponovno nacionalizacijo skupne tržne ureditve s sprejetjem načina upravljanja "zaprtega tipa".
Without overlooking national and regional particularities which, moreover, give European wine its cultural character, we should from the outset define the objectives of the abovementioned horizontal policies so that wine-growing regions are not destabilised and supply and demand are balanced without the re-nationalisation of the CMO through the adoption of a ‘closed’ management approach.
Novo skupno tržno ureditev je nujno izvajati v dveh fazah: v prvi fazi (2008/2011) mora biti cilj reorganizacija trga in postopna prilagoditev skupne tržne ureditve preprostejšemu in konkurenčnejšemu okviru z osredotočenjem na enotne politike in ukrepe; v drugi fazi (2012/2015) se bodo v celoti izvajali programi podpore in razvoja vinskega sektorja na nacionalni in regionalni ravni, pri čemer bo vodilno načelo ohranitev stabilnih trgov in večja konkurenčnost evropskih vin.
It is indispensable to implement the new CMO in two phases: during the first (2008/2011) the objective must be to reorganise the market and gradually adjust the CMO to a simpler and more competitive framework by focusing on uniform policies and measures; the second phase (2012/2015) will pursue the full development of the Support and Development Programmes in the wine sector (SDPWs) at national and regional level, with the maintenance of stable markets and an increase in the competitiveness of European wines as the guiding principle.
Prav tako je nujno doseči postopno liberalizacijo novih nasadov, kar seveda ne bo možno izvajati neodvisno od postopka pregledovanja nezakonitih nasadov vinskih trt, ker bi drugače obstajalo tveganje, da ne bi bilo več nadzora nad temi območji, kar bi prizadelo celotni trg za vino.
It is also indispensable to achieve the gradual liberalisation of new plantings which cannot of course be implemented independently of the procedure for examining illegal wine plantings, given the risk of controls on these areas disappearing, which would affect the wine market as a whole.
Temeljita reforma tržne ureditve v vinskem sektorju – usklajenost z novo skupno kmetijsko politiko (SKP)
C. Profound reform of the CMO in the wine sector – Compatibility with the new common agricultural policy
Ker niti obstoječa skupna ureditev trga za vino niti metoda njenega izvajanja na nacionalni in regionalni ravni ne predvidevata nobene neposredne podpore za vinogradnike, je treba oblikovati politiko za njihovo podporo, ki bo združljiva z novo skupno kmetijsko politiko (SKP), tako da bo skupna ureditev trga za vino v skladu z njenimi temeljnimi načeli.
Since neither the existing CMO in wine nor the method of implementing it at national and regional level provide for any direct support for wine growers, a policy to support wine growers must be developed which is compatible with the new CAP so that the CMO in wine complies with its basic principles.
Komisija meni, da se bo kmetijski dohodek na račun popolne nevezanosti pomoči zvišal šele srednjeročno, ker se bodo obseg proizvodnje in poslovni interesi zmanjševali postopoma, česar si ne želi, kot je to razvidno iz njenih pripomb o tretjem scenariju.
The Commission considers that the increase in farmers’ incomes from complete decoupling will only occur in the medium term, since the volume of production and commercial interest will gradually decline, an outcome which it does not wish, as its comments on the third scenario indicate.
Nasprotno pa je Komisija še posebej naklonjena spodbujanju programa krčenja za zmanjšanje proizvodnje, kar ni bilo predlagano za noben drug kmetijski sektor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike (SKP).
However, the Commission is particularly favourable to promoting a programme of grubbing-up to reduce production, a measure which has not been proposed for any other agricultural sector under the CAP.
Tudi v primeru sladkorja je predlog za zmanjšanje proizvodnje sladkorne pese spremljalo postopno zniževanje intervencijskih cen in pobud za prestrukturiranje z ustanovitvijo sklada za prestrukturiranje sladkorja.
Even in the case of sugar the proposal to reduce sugar beet production was accompanied by a gradual reduction in support prices and restructuring initiatives with the establishment of a sugar restructuring fund.
Za zagotovitev trajnostnega razvoja sektorja je pomembno, da se del sredstev Skupnosti, ki so se doslej v glavnem uporabila za destilacijo, nameni financiranju neposrednih ukrepov, kot so proizvodne metode, navzkrižno usklajevanje, nadzor ponudbe vin in izboljšanje kakovosti vin.
If the sector is to develop in a viable manner, it is important that part of Community funds, which have so far been used mainly for distillation, be made available for funding direct actions, such as methods of production, cross-compliance, controls on wine supply and boosting wine quality.
Financiranje krčenja z namenom dokončnega zmanjšanja ponudbe ne more biti prednostna naloga Skupnosti.
The funding of grubbing-up aimed at definitively reducing supply cannot be a Community priority, especially since it will use up significant Community resources.
Obveznega spoštovanja zgornje meje donosa za kakovostna vina, proizvedena v določenih območjih, ni bilo možno učinkovito nadzorovati, ker Skupnost nima ustrezne omejitve za namizna vina; to pomeni, da se lahko grozdje z iste parcele uporabi za proizvodnjo več vrst vina.
Compulsory compliance with a ceiling for yield for quality wine produced in specific regions (QWPSR) could not be effectively monitored since there is no corresponding Community restriction for table wines; this means that in some cases grapes from the same plot may be used for the production of more than one category of wine.
Zato je pomembno, da kmetijske prakse in omejitve za vina z geografsko označbo veljajo tudi za namizna vina, ki se bodo drugače označevala in bodo imela večjo tržno vrednost, kar bo vplivalo na zvišanje dohodkov vinogradnikov.
It is therefore important that agricultural practices and restrictions on wines with a geographical indication should also apply to table wines whose labelling will change and whose commercial value will increase, leading to an increase in wine growers’ incomes.
Nadzorovanje proizvodnih pogojev predstavlja rešitev za prekomerno proizvodnjo v številnih vinogradih in slabo kakovost njihovih proizvodov.
Controlling the conditions of production constitutes a solution to the over-production of many vineyards and the low quality of their products.
Znanstvene analize so pokazale, da so visoki donosi v nekaterih primerih obratno sorazmerni s kakovostjo vin, ker težijo k zmanjšanju vsebnosti sladkorja, aromatičnih značilnosti in razmerja polifenolov.
Scientific analyses have shown that high yields in some cases are in inverse proportion to the quality of wines, since they tend to reduce sugar content and the aromatic characteristics and the ratio of polyphenols.
V tej zvezi morajo biti nadomestne rešitve za krčenje programi za začasno opuščanje (prezgodnja trgatev ali rezanje grozdja, preden dozori) in zmanjšanje hektarskega donosa.
In this context, temporary abandonment programmes (premature harvesting or cutting bunches before ripening) and reducing yields per hectare should be alternative solutions to grubbing-up.
Program za zmanjšanje hektarskega donosa bi lahko temeljil na mejnih vrednostih donosa, določenih za posamezne parcele na podlagi nove razvrstitve vin.
This last programme could be based on thresholds or yield limits set in relation to individual plots on the basis of a new classification of wines.
Zmanjšanje ali nadzor donosa – seveda ne pod mejno vrednost, kar bi škodovalo konkurenčnosti sektorja – bi lahko dosegli s spodbujanjem novih kmetijskih praks, kot so zaraščanje (proizvajalci vina pustijo, da se med vrstami vinskih trt razraste vegetacija, ki vinske trte izčrpa), delno odstranjevanje poganjkov (odstranjevanje poganjkov s sadeži) ali trgatev, preden grozdje dozori (odstranjevanje nekaterih grozdov, preden dozorijo).
Reducing or controlling yields - not, of course, below a production threshold which would jeopardise the sector’s competitiveness - could be achieved by promoting new agricultural practices, including allowing vegetation to grow (wine producers let vegetation grow among the vines which are thus exhausted), the partial removal of shoots (consists of the removal of new shoots with fruit) or harvesting before the grapes are ripe (removal of some bunches before they are mature).
Tovrstne prakse bi poleg tega omogočile zmanjšanje uporabe sredstev za zaščito rastlin, gnojenja in namakanja ter bi lahko celo izboljšale izbiro vrst.
In addition these practices permit a reduction in plant health interventions, fertilisation and irrigation and may even improve the choice of varieties.
Financiranje tega ukrepa bi lahko olajšali z uvedbo kodeksov dobre prakse v vsaki posamezni regiji v sodelovanju z medstrokovnimi organizacijami in organizacijami proizvajalcev.
Funding of this measure could also be facilitated by codes of good practice established in each region in cooperation with the interprofessional organisations and producer organisations.
Mehanizem destilacije je imel doslej predvsem vlogo javnega poseganja na vinskem trgu, podobno kot drugi mehanizmi, ki so bili v veljavi za druge kmetijske proizvode do nedavne reforme skupne kmetijske politike.
The distillation mechanism has so far basically played the role of public intervention in the wine market, like equivalent mechanisms which existed for other agricultural products until the recent review of the CAP.
Destilacija ima še posebej pomembno vlogo v sedanji skupni tržni ureditvi, saj letno zajame približno 10 % proizvodnje vina in celo 30 % proizvodnje namiznega vina na posameznega proizvajalca, medtem ko je destilacija kakovostnih vin izredno redka.
Distillation has a particularly important role to play in the present CMO since it absorbs some 10 % of wine production annually, with distillation of table wines as high as 30 % per producer, unlike quality wines, very little of which is distilled.
Letni proračun za destilacijo je približno 500 milijonov EUR, celotni stroški za skladiščenje alkohola pa znašajo 237 milijonov EUR; za upravljanje destilacije se tako porabi 45 % vseh sredstev Skupnosti za skupno tržno ureditev.
The annual budget for distillation is approximately EUR 500 million, while total costs for storing alcohol amount to EUR 237 million: the management of distillation therefore accounts for 45 % of total Community resources for the CMO in question.
Poudariti je treba, da je predlog Komisije za ohranitev destilacije ali umik stranskih proizvodov brez financiranja nesmiseln, kajti destilacija zadeva proizvajalce vina, izvajajo pa jo destilarne, ki zaradi pomanjkanja finančnih spodbud destilacije ali umika ne bodo izvajale.
It should be stressed that the Commission proposal on maintaining distillation or withdrawing by-products without funding does not make sense, since distillation concerns wine producers, while it is distillers who carry it out: the lack of financial incentive for the latter will make distilling or withdrawal inoperative.
Predlog Komisije za nadzorovan umik ali destilacijo bo ustvaril resne okoljske probleme v večjih vinogradniških območjih.
The Commission’s proposal for the controlled withdrawal or distillation would create serious environmental problems in major wine-producing regions.
Vendar pa bo tudi predlog za odpravo destilacije vina iz grozdja za dvojni namen sprožil proizvodnjo velikih količin vina in s tem močno pretresel regionalni in evropski trg ter ustvaril probleme znotraj območij.
However, the proposal for the abolition of dual-purpose distillation would lead to the vinification of large quantities, which would greatly disrupt the European market and create problems within regions.
Če ne bo zagotovljeno postopno zmanjšanje presežkov – kar predlog Komisije očitno ne zagotavlja – bo to povzročilo hud pretres na tržišču in močno vplivalo na dohodke vinogradnikov.
A failure to absorb surpluses gradually - a contingency which is apparently not catered for in the Commission’s proposal - would create very significant market turbulence but also greatly affect wine growers’ income.
Posredovanje Skupnosti v obliki mehanizma upravljanja trga je v prehodni prvi fazi reforme (2008-2011) še vedno nujno zaradi reorganizacije trgov in zaščite kakovosti vin; pri teh prehodnih ukrepih v zvezi z destilacijo je treba vedno razlikovati med konjunkturno presežno proizvodnjo in strukturnimi presežki, zavedati se je treba pomena "tehničnih" zalog in večjo pozornost nameniti trgu z alkoholom.
Community intervention in the form of a market management mechanism remains indispensable during the transitional first phase of reform (2008-2011) in order to reorganise the markets and safeguard the quality of wines; these provisional distillation measures must always distinguish between cyclical over-production and structural surpluses, recognise the importance of ‘technical’ stocks and finally pay more attention to the alcohol market.
Predlog Komisije, da se za ponovno vzpostavitev tržnega ravnotežja "čudežno" in brez kakršnih koli meril izvaja režim krčenja, ki bi zajel 12 % evropskih vinogradov, hkrati z ohranitvijo prepovedi novih nasadov do leta 2013, ne more spodbujati trajnostnega razvoja in konkurenčnosti celotnega evropskega vinskega sektorja, ki se mora soočati z izzivi odprtih in globaliziranih trgov.
The Commission’s justification for restoring market equilibrium by the ‘magical’ implementation of a grubbing-up regime without recourse to any criteria accounting for as much as 12 % of European vineyards, in combination with a continuation of bans on new plantings up to 2013 cannot provide the basis for a viable and competitive development of the entire European wine growing sector which has to face the challenge of open and globalised markets.
Ta model bo povzročil nepopravljivo škodo evropski konkurenčnosti, uničil družbeno in gospodarsko strukturo podeželja in ustvaril vrsto resnih okoljskih problemov, ki bodo imeli v nekaterih območjih trajne posledice; po drugi strani pa bo spodbujal večjo proizvodnjo vin v "novem svetu", kar bo evropskim vinom srednjeročno preprečilo ponovno osvojitev trgov.
This model will cause irreparable damage to European competitiveness, destroy the social and economic fabric of the countryside, create a series of environmental problems which in some regions will be irreversible, but it will also encourage an increase in ‘New World’ wine production, which in the medium term will prevent European wines recapturing markets.
Omejitev in nadzor proizvodnje vina, kot to predlaga Komisija v svojem sporočilu, ne moreta biti podvržena dejavnikoma "stabilizacije" proizvodnje, kot sta trajna opustitev in prepoved novih nasadov do leta 2013.
Restrictions and controls on wine production, as proposed by the Commission in its communication, cannot be subject to two production ‘stabilisers’, such as permanent abandonment and a ban on new plantings until 2013.
Evropski vinski sektor se bo zaradi stalnega zmanjševanja proizvodnje znašel v neugodnem položaju v primerjavi z vini, uvoženimi iz "novega sveta", še posebej vpričo dejstva, da so potrebna vsaj štiri leta, da novi nasadi obrodijo, kar pomeni, da bo prva generacija novih nasadov obrodila šele v letih 2014–2017.
Owing to steadily declining production, the European wine sector would find itself in a disadvantageous position compared to imported ‘New World’ wines, particularly in view of the fact that at least four years are needed for new plantings to produce a yield, which means that the first generation of new plantings will only produce a yield in 2014-2017.
Register vinogradov – orodje za učinkovit nadzor in upravljanje skupne tržne ureditve
H. Vineyard register - Tool for effective controls and management of the CMO
Register vinogradov držav članic je treba dopolniti ali prilagoditi tako, da se vzpostavi povezava med parcelami ter proizvedenimi vini in da se nadzoruje označevanje, ki izhaja iz nove razvrstitve vin.
The vineyard register of Member States must be completed or adapted so that a correlation is established between plots and the wine produced and that the labels created by the new classification of wines are controlled.