natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Člen 5, točka 3 Člen 19a, odstavek 4, pododstavek 3 (Direktiva 2006/48/ES)
ARTICLE 5, POINT 3 Article 19a, paragraph 4, subparagraph 3 (Directive 2006/48/EC)
Člen 19 a, odstavek 4, pododstavek 3 a (novo) (Direktiva 2006/48/ES)
Article 19 a, paragraph 4, subparagraph 3 a (new) (Directive 2006/48/EC)
Komisija najkasneje do + oceni, ali so seznami držav članic primerljivi, in po potrebi sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovi pristop na ravni Skupnosti.
The Commission shall, by + , assess whether Member States' lists are comparable, if appropriate, shall take the necessary steps to provide a Community approach.
Člen 5, točka 3 Člen 19b, uvodni del (Direktiva 2006/48/ES)
ARTICLE 5, POINT 3 Article 19b, introductory part (Directive 2006/48/EC) , AM 109 and AM110
Poleg členov 19 in 19a in če ni drugače določeno, velja za oceno pridobitve v skladu s členom 19a(1) člen 129(3) , če je predlagani pridobitelj:
In addition to Articles 19 and 19a and unless specified otherwise, the assessment of the acquisition in accordance with Article 19a(1) shall be subject to Article 129(3) if the proposed acquirer is one of the following:
Pristojni organi, odgovorni za nadzor kreditne institucije, v kateri se skuša pridobiti delež, in pristojni organi, odgovorni za nadzor predlaganega pridobitelja, med seboj sodelujejo in se posvetujejo pri oceni pridobitve v skladu s členom 19a(1), če je predlagani pridobitelj:
The competent authorities responsible for the supervision of the credit institution in which the acquisition is sought, and the competent authorities responsible for the supervision of the proposed acquirer shall work in full consultation with each other when assessing the acquisition in accordance with Article 19a (1) if the proposed acquirer is one of the following:
Člen 5, točka 3 Člen 19b, odstavek 1 a (novo) in 1 b (novo) (Direktiva 2006/48/ES)
ARTICLE 5, POINT 3 Article 19b, paragraphs 1 a (new) and 1 b (new) (Directive 2006/48/EC)
Pristojni organi brez nepotrebnih zamud drug drugemu zagotavljajo informacije, ki so bistvene ali pomembne za ocenjevanje pridobitve.
The competent authorities shall, without undue delay, provide one another with any information which is essential or relevant for assessing the acquisition.
Sklep pristojnega organa, ki je izdal in nadzira dovoljenje kreditne institucije, v kateri se skuša pridobiti delež, vsebuje vsa stališča ali zadržke pristojnih organov, ki so odgovorni za nadzor predlaganega pridobitelja.
A decision by the competent authority that has authorised and supervises the credit institution in which the proposed acquisition is sought shall indicate any views or reservations expressed by the competent authority responsible for supervising the proposed acquirer.
Člen 5, točka 3 Člen 19c (Direktiva 2006/48/ES)
ARTICLE 5, POINT 3 Article 19c (Directive 2006/48/EC)
Komisija lahko od pristojnih organov zahteva, da ji takoj pošljejo kopije dokumentov, na katerih so utemeljili svojo oceno v zvezi s členi 19, 19a in 19b, ter razloge, ki so jih navedli predlaganemu pridobitelju.
The Commission may request the competent authorities to provide it promptly with copies of the documents on which they have based their assessment in relation to Articles 19, 19a and 19b as well as the reasons given to the proposed acquirer.
Za informacije, ki se zagotovijo Komisiji, velja obveznost varovanja poslovne skrivnosti, Komisija pa jih uporabi samo pri odločitvi, ali je država članica izpolnila svoje obveznosti iz te direktive.
The information provided to the Commission shall be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy and shall be used only for the purposes of determining whether a Member State has fulfilled its obligations under this Directive.
Zaupne informacije , ki jih Komisija lahko prejme na podlagi odstavka 1, se ne smejo razkriti nobeni drugi osebi ali organu, razen v obliki povzetka ali zbirne informacije, tako da se posamezni predlagani pridobitelji ali zadevne kreditne institucije ne morejo prepoznati.“
Confidential information which the Commission may receive by virtue of paragraph 1 shall not be divulged to any person or authority whatsoever, except in summary or collective form, such that individual proposed acquirers or the credit institutions concerned cannot be identified.
Zaupne informacije se ne smejo razkriti nobeni drugi osebi ali organu, razen v obliki povzetka ali zbirne informacije, tako da se posamezni predlagani pridobitelji ali zadevne kreditne institucije ne morejo prepoznati.
Confidential information shall not be divulged to any person or authority whatsoever, except in summary or collective form, such that individual proposed acquirers or the credit institutions concerned cannot be identified.
Člen 5, točka 4 a (novo) Člen 21, odstavek 3 (Direktiva 2006/48/ES)
ARTICLE 5, POINT 4 A (new) Article 21, paragraph 3 (Directive 2006/48/EC)
(4a) Člen 21(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(4a) Article 21(3) shall be replaced by the following:
Pri določitvi kvalificiranega deleža in drugih deležev iz tega člena in členov 19 do 20 se upoštevajo glasovalne pravice iz členov 9 in 10 Direktive 2004/109/ES."
In determining a qualifying holding and other levels of holding referred to in this Article and in Articles 19 to 20, the voting rights referred to in Articles 9 and 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC shall be taken into consideration."
Predlog spremembe posodablja člen 21(3) direktive, da bi vseboval sklicevanje na direktivo o preglednosti v skladu s členom 12(1).
The amendment updates Article 21(3) of the Directive to refer to the Transparency Directive, in line with Article 12(1).
Zagotavlja tudi, da so glasovalne pravice iz členov 9 in 10 direktive o preglednosti upoštevane tudi v členih 19 do 20 direktive ter tudi v členu 21 direktive.
It also ensures that the voting rights referred to in Articles 9 and 10 of the Transparency Directive are also taken into consideration in Articles 19 to 20 of the Directive, as well as in Article 21 of the Directive.
Člen 5, točka 5 Člen 129, odstavek 3 (Direktiva 2006/48/ES)
ARTICLE 5, POINT 5 Article 129, paragraph 3 (Directive 2006/48/EC)
V členu 129 se doda naslednji odstavek 3:
In Article 129, the following paragraph 3 is added:
Pri oceni v skladu s členom 19a(1) se mora pristojni organ, ki je izdal dovoljenje kreditni instituciji, v kateri se skuša pridobiti delež, posvetovati s pristojnim organom predlaganega pridobitelja.
In the case of an assessment in accordance with Article 19a(1), the competent authority, which has authorised the credit institution in which the proposed acquisition is sought shall consult the competent authority of the proposed acquirer..
Pri odločitvi pristojnega organa, ki je izdal dovoljenje kreditni instituciji, v kateri se skuša pridobiti predlagani delež, se upoštevajo vsa stališča ali pridržki, ki jih je izrazil pristojni organ pridobitelja.“
A decision by the competent authority which has authorised the credit institution in which the proposed acquisition is sought shall indicate any views or reservations on the part expressed by of the competent authority of the acquirer.”
Člen 6, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1
ARTICLE 6, PARAGRAPH 1, SUBPARAGRAPH 1
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do […] 1 .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [...] 1 at the latest.
Besedilo teh predpisov in korelacijsko tabelo med navedenimi predpisi in to direktivo takoj sporočijo Komisiji.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
Šest mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te direktive.
Six months after the entry into force of this Directive.
Dvanajst mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te direktive.
Twelve months after the entry into force of this Directive.
Ponavadi traja obdobje izvajanja 12 mesecev.
Usually the implementation period is 12 months.
To načelo je treba ohraniti, saj je tako časovno obdobje sprejemljivo.
This principle should be kept as this is a reasonable time period.
Šestmesečno obdobje izvajanja bi bilo prekratko.
An implementation period of 6 months would be too tight.
Med neformalnim srečanjem Ekonomsko-socialnega sveta (ECOFIN) v Scheveningenu septembra 2004 so potekale razprave o čezmejnih združitvah in prevzemih v finančnem in bančnem sektorju.
During the informal ECOFIN Council in Scheveningen in September 2004, cross-border mergers and acquisitions activity in the financial and banking sectors was discussed.
V finančnem in bančnem sektorju so bile te dejavnosti občutno nižje kot v drugih sektorjih.
It was perceived as significantly lower than in other sectors.
Zato je bila Komisija zaprošena, da izvede raziskavo o morebitnih ovirah za finančno konsolidacijo na notranjem trgu.
Consequently, the Commission was asked to conduct a survey on potential barriers to financial consolidation within the internal market.
Ugotovili so, da je treba za premostitev teh težav spremeniti zakonodajo.
In order to overcome this situation, legislative changes were considered to be necessary.
Prvotno so bile predvidene le spremembe v pravilih bančne nadzorne ocene.
Originally, only changes to the rules on banking supervisory assessment were foreseen.
Komisija je kasneje, zaradi podobnosti ustreznih določb, ki se uporabljajo v bančništvu in tistimi v zavarovalništvu in vrednostnih papirjih s podporo ministrov ECOFIN predlagala spremembo pravil nadzorne ocene na vseh področjih finančnega trga: bančništvu, zavarovalništvu in investicijskih družbah.
Later, due to similarities between the relevant provisions applicable to banking and those on insurance and securities, and with the support of the ECOFIN ministers, the Commission proposed to change the supervisory assessment rules in all areas of the financial market: banking, insurance and investment firms.
Pristop zagotavlja uporabo primerljivih pravil v celotnem finančnem sektorju.
This approach guarantees that comparable rules apply across the financial sector.
V medsektorske združitve in prevzeme pa vnaša tudi potrebno jasnost.
It also brings needed clarity to cross-sectoral M&A.
Predlog Komisije, objavljen septembra 2006 tako vključuje spremembe naslednjih direktiv: 1992/49/EGS (zavarovalništvo), 2002/83/ES (zavarovalništvo), 2004/39/ES (investicijske družbe), 2005/68/ES (pozavarovalništvo) in 2006/48/ES (bančništvo).
The proposal of the Commission, published in September 2006, thus includes changes to the following Directives: 1992/49/EEC (insurance), 2002/83/EC (assurance), 2004/39/EC (investment firms), 2005/68/EC (reinsurance) and 2006/48/EC (banking).
Glavne točke predloga Komisije
The Main points of the Commission proposal:
Kar zadeva postopek obveščanja, časovnega načrta postopka ocenjevanja in uporabljenih meril, sledi predlog pristopu največjega možnega usklajevanja .
The proposal follows a maximum harmonization approach as regards the notification procedure, the timeline of the assessment procedure and criteria to be applied to this assessment.
V zakonodajo Skupnosti uvaja jasne časovne roke za vsak korak v postopku ocenjevanja.
It introduces clear deadlines for each step of the assessment procedure in Community legislation.
Časovni roki so občutno krajši.
The deadlines have been considerably tightened .
Nadzorniki imajo trenutno 3 mesece (ali 65 delovnih dni) časa, da izvedejo oceno in lahko to obdobje podaljšajo za nedoločen čas.
Currently, supervisors have 3 months (or 65 working days) to conduct an assessment and may prolong this period for an unlimited time.
Predlog Komisije občutno skrajša ocenjevalno obdobje na 30 delovnih dni.
The Commission proposal significantly reduces the assessment period to 30 working days (WD) .
Obdobje se lahko podaljša na največ 40 delovnih dni, če pristojni organ zahteva nadaljnje informacije, v tem primeru se rok podaljša za nadaljnjih 10 delovnih dni.
The period can be extended to maximum of 40 WD if the competent authority requests further information, in which case the clock would stop for 10 another WD.
Predlog pojasnjuje pogoje in razmere, ko pristojni organ lahko "ustavi čas": to lahko stori le enkrat, največ za 10 dni.
The proposal clarifies the conditions and situations under which a competent authority can "stop the clock": this is possible only once and for a maximum period of 10 days.
V primeru tretjih držav, ocenjevalno obdobje ne sme preseči 50 oziroma 60 delovnih dni.
In case of the involvement of third countries, the assessment may not exceed 50 WD or 60 WD respectively.
Predlog določa "zaključen" seznam meril, po katerih mora pristojni organ oceniti morebitnega pridobitelja.
The proposal lays down a "closed" list of the criteria against which a competent authority has to assess a potential acquirer.
Komisija predlaga 5 meril:
There are 5 criteria proposed by the Commission:
I. ugled pridobitelja;
I. reputation of the acquirer;
II. ugled in izkušnje oseb, ki vodijo pridobitelja;
II. reputation and experience of persons who direct the acquirer;
III. finančna trdnost predlaganega pridobitelja;
III. financial soundness of the proposed acquirer;
IV. spoštovanje sektorskih pravil in obveznosti ter zakonodaje Skupnosti po združitvi/prevzemu;
IV. compliance with sectoral rules and obligations with Community legislation after the acquisition/merger;
V. sum pranja denarja ali financiranja teroristov.
V. suspicions of money laundering or terrorist financing
To bodo edina ocenjevalna merila pristojnih organov držav članic, ko bo pridobitev kvalificiranega deleža:
These will be the only criteria to be assessed by competent authorities of Member States in the situations when the acquisition of a qualifying shareholding:
i. potekala v eni od držav članic;
i. occurs within one Member State ;
ii. segala preko meja ali potekala med sektorji;
ii. has cross-border or cross-sectoral dimension ;
iii. vključevala pridobitelja zunaj Skupnosti, ki ima tudi sedež zunaj Skupnosti;
iii. the acquirer is regulated outside the Community and has its head office outside the Community;
iv. vključevala pridobitelja, ki je nereguliran subjekt;
iv. the potential acquirer is a non-regulated entity ;
v. vključevala pridobitelja, ki je fizična oseba;
v. the potential acquirer is a natural person
vi. vključevala pridobitelja, ki je upravljavski sklad ali skrbnik;
vi. the potential acquirer is a management fund or custodian;
Vse prihodnje zahteve in pojasnitve meril, ki odražajo tržni razvoj, se opravijo s postopkom komitologije.
Any future specifications and clarifications of the criteria in order to reflect market developments shall be done via comitology.
Predlog Komisije prepušča opredelitev seznama dokumentov za postopek ocenjevanja državam članicam.
The Commission proposal leaves upon Member States to determine a list of documents needed for the assessment process.
Vendar zahteva, da lahko države zahtevajo le informacije, potrebne za ocenjevanje varnega in skrbnega poslovanja.
However, it requires that only information relevant for the prudential assessment can be requested.
Poleg tega morajo biti sorazmerne in prilagojene vrsti predlagane pridobitve ali povečanja deleža.
Moreover, it has to be proportionate to the nature of the proposed acquisition or increase of holding.
Pojasnjuje razmere, ko so v združitve ali prevzeme vključene dve ali več držav članic .
It clarifies the situation when two or more Member States are involved in a merger or acquisition.
Zahteva tesno sodelovanje/ posvetovanje med vpletenimi nadzorniki .
It requires close cooperation/ consultation between the supervisors concerned.
Odločilno vlogo ima nadzornik "cilja".
The supervisor of the "target" maintains a decisive role.
Tako predlog ne predstavlja nikakršnega prenosa odgovornosti, kot se to trenutno dogaja, temveč bolj poudarja sodelovanje.
Thus, the proposal does not imply any shift of responsibilities as compared to the current situation, but rather puts more emphasis on cooperation.
Komisija pojasnjuje breme dokazil, ki dokazuje, da je v primeru negativnega sklepa v postopku ocenjevanja nadzorni organ cilja tisti, ki nosi breme dokazil .
The Commission clarifies that the burden of proof lies in case of a negative decision in the assessment process on the supervisory authority of the target.
Predlog uvaja pravico Komisije, da od pristojnih oblasti neposredno zahteva dokumente, na katerih temelji njihova ocena.
The proposal introduces the right of the Commission to directly request from competent authorities the documents on which their assessment is based.
Komisija lahko trenutno pozove države članice, naj od nadzornih organov zahtevajo informacije o varnem in skrbnem poslovanju, vendar v resnici zagotavljanje dostopa do teh dokumentov ni obvezno.
Currently, the Commission may ask Member States to request prudential information from their supervisory authorities but in reality there is no obligation to provide access to such documents.
Mnenje poročevalca
Your rapporteur´s view
Dejavnost združitev in prevzemov morajo znotraj enotnega trga voditi podjetniške odločitve in izvedljive koristi za potrošnike, biti pa morajo popolnima usklajene z evropskim konkurenčnim pravom.
Within a single market, M&A activity should be driven by business decisions, achievable benefits for consumers, and should be fully compliant with European competition law.
Zato je treba odstraniti vse neupravičene ovire na notranjem trgu.
Therefore, any unjustified barriers within the internal market have to be eliminated.
Vseeno pa je treba opozoriti, da so bile zlorabe nadzornih pooblastil redke.
However, it must be recalled that misuse of supervisory powers has been rare.
Zato je treba vse spremembe postopka ocenjevanja usmeriti k preprečevanju prihodnjih zlorab, morajo pa biti tudi sorazmerne in ne smejo po nepotrebnem zmanjševati nadzornih pooblastil.
Therefore, any changes to the assessment procedure should be aimed at preventing any future misuse, but must be proportionate and should not reduce supervisory powers unnecessarily.
Poročevalec v celoti podpira načelo največje usklajenosti .
Your rapporteur fully supports the principle of maximum harmonisation .
Ta pristop zagotavlja najboljše skupne evropske pogoje in postopke, pravno varnost in jasnost ter preprečuje zlorabe.
This approach guarantees best common European conditions and procedures, legal certainty and clarity, and prevention of misuse.
Poročevalec pozdravlja usklajevanje postopka ocenjevanja , zlasti določanje jasnih časovnih rokov za vsak korak postopke ocenjevanja na ravni EU, opredelitev najdaljšega obdobja za ustavitev časa, čas pa je mogoče ustaviti le enkrat in to za določeno obdobje 10 delovnih dni.
Your rapporteur welcomes the streamlining of the assessment process, namely the fact that at the EU level clear deadlines for each step of the assessment procedure are to be set up, a maximum period for stopping the clock will be determined and that there is only one possibility to stop the clock for the defined period of 10 WD.
Vendar poročevalec razume, da za pripravo dobre, utemeljene in natančne ocene nadzorni organi potrebujejo dovolj časa.
However, your rapporteur understands that supervisory authorities need sufficient time to make a proper, reasoned and thorough assessment.
Zaskrbljen je, saj lahko nepotrebno kratka časovna omejitev predstavlja tveganje za finančno stabilnost znotraj EU.
And he is concerned that an unnecessary short time limit may pose risks to financial stability within the EU.
Zato je treba uravnotežiti usklajevanje postopka, tako da se skrajša ocenjevalno obdobje in določi zadostni čas, da lahko nadzorni organi pridobitelja primerno ocenijo.
Therefore, it is necessary to strike the right balance between streamlining the procedure by reducing the assessment period and determining a reasonable time during which supervisory authorities can assess an acquirer properly.
Zato poročevalec predlaga podaljšanje ocenjevalnega obdobja s 47 delovnih dni (brez ustavljanja časa) in 57 delovnih dni (z ustavljanjem časa) na 77 delovnih dni (brez ustavljanja časa) in 87 delovnih dni (z ustavljanjem časa), ko so vključene tretje države.
For these reasons, your rapporteur proposes to extend the assessment period to 47 WD (without stopping the clock) and 57 WD (with a stopping of the clock) and accordingly, in case of involvement of third-countries, to 77 WD (without stopping the clock) and 87 WD (with a stopping of the clock).
Poročevalec podpira zaprt seznam meril za vso Evropo.
Your rapporteur is in favour of a closed list of criteria that will apply all over Europe.
To bo povečalo jasnost in preglednost postopka ter varnost udeležencev na trgu.
This will bring more clarity and transparency to the process and certainty for market players.
Poleg tega bo to preprečilo razmere, ko bi neomenjeno število dodatnih meril lahko neupravičeno oviralo delovanje združitev in prevzemov.
Moreover, this will prevent a situation where an indefinite number of additional criteria may unduly obstruct a M&A operation.
Po mnenju poročevalca predlagana merila v celoti zagotavljajo potreben okvir za izvedbo primerne nadzorne ocene in so sorazmerna namenu direktive.
In your rapporteur´s view, the proposed criteria broadly provide the needed framework to conduct a proper supervisory assessment and are proportionate to the scope of the directive.
Vendar meni, da je treba še podrobneje pojasniti in opredeliti predvsem merilo "ugleda pridobitelja", tako ga je treba obravnavati glede na to, ali ima morebitni pridobitelj dovoljenje EU in ali ga EU tudi ureja.
Yet he believes some clarification and refinement is needed, in particular as regards the criterion of "reputation of the acquirer", thus it should be considered with due regard to the fact that a potential acquirer is or is not an EU licensed and regulated entity.
V prvem primeru je ocena prvega merila močno poenostavljena, ker ima pridobitelj primerno dovoljenje in ga nadzoruje EU.
In the first case, the assessment of the first criterion is to a large extent simplified because the acquirer is duly licensed and supervised within the EU.
Poročevalec se strinja, da je treba morebitne nadaljnje podrobne opise tehničnih podatkov urejati s postopkom komitologije.
Your rapporteur agrees that if specification of technical details of the criteria is needed in future, it should be conducted via comitology.
Nadalje je treba zagotoviti, da ciljni subjekt še naprej izpolnjuje vse zahteve za nadzor skrbnega in varnega poslovanja ustreznega sektorja.
Furthermore, it must be ensured that the target entity continues to fulfil all prudential requirements for the sector in question.
Predlagani ukrep ne sme posameznikov ali institucij, ki so pripravljene opravljati bančne (ali zavarovalniške) posle, spodbujati, da se s prevzemom banke (ali zavarovalnice) izognejo strožjim zahtevam za odobritev.
The proposed measure should by no means encourage individuals or institutions willing to conduct banking (or insurance) business to evade stricter authorisation requirements by acquiring a bank (or insurance).
Poročevalec podpira praktični pristop, ki državam članicam nalaga odgovornost pri določanju seznama dokumentov , ki jih mora predložiti morebitni pridobitelj.
Your rapporteur supports the practical approach which leaves upon Member States the responsibility to define the list of documents that a potential acquirer has to submit.
Ne glede na to je zelo za želeno nadaljnje usklajevanje na 3. stopnji odbora Lamfalussy (odbor evropskih bančnih nadzornikov, odbor evropskih regulativnih organov s področja vrednostnih papirjev in odbor evropskih zavarovalnih in pokojninskih nadzornikov) in razvoj skupnega pristopa na tem področju.
Notwithstanding this fact, further coordination within level 3 Lamfalussy committees (CEIOPS, CESR and CEBS) and development of a common approach in this area is highly desirable.
Poročilo Komisije dve leti po prenosu direktive bi omogočilo pregled stopnje primerljivosti nacionalnih seznamov.
A review by the Commission two years after the transposition of the Directives would allow an examination of the degree of comparability of national lists.