natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Z evropskim plačilnim nalogom se toženca obvesti, da lahko vloži ugovor na evropski plačilni nalog , ki mora v treh tednih od dneva vročitve v skladu s pravom države članice, na ozemlju katere se vročitev opravi, prispeti na sodišče, ki je nalog izdalo.
In the European order for payment the defendant shall be informed that he can lodge a statement of opposition to the European order for payment which has to reach the court that has issued the order within three weeks starting from the date of service of the European order for payment on him in accordance with the law of the Member State in which service is effected .
Z evropskim plačilnim nalogom se toženca obvesti, da ima pravico vložiti ugovor, ki mora v enem mesecu prispeti na sodišče izvora in da se bo postopek v tem primeru od dneva vročitve nadaljeval pred pristojnim sodiščem .
In the European order for payment the defendant shall be informed that he has the right to lodge a statement of opposition which has to reach the court of origin within one month and that, in that case, the procedure will continue before the competent courts from the date of service or notification .
Ti predlogi sprememb so povezani.
These amendments are connected.
Enostopenjski postopek je preprostejši in hitrejši.
A one-step procedure is simpler and quicker.
V konkretnem primeru torej dolžnik prejme odredbo za plačilo (z vročitvijo) in se ga obvesti, da ima mesec dni časa za vložitev ugovora.
In practical terms, the debtor receives a payment order (it is served on him) and is informed that he has one month in which to lodge a state of opposition.
Evropski plačilni nalog se v drugi državi članici priznava in izvršuje brez odločbe o razglasitvi izvršljivosti in njegovemu priznanju ni mogoče oporekati.
The European order for payment shall be recognised and enforced in another Member State without the need for a declaration of enforceability and without any possibility of opposing its recognition.
Predlog spremembe določa, da naj bo evropski plačilni nalog izdan v eni državi članici izvršljiv v drugi državi članici brez odločbe o razglasitvi izvršljivosti v drugi državi članici.
The proposed amendment provides that a European order for payment issued in one Member State should be enforceable in another Member State without the need for a decision declaring it enforceable in the other Member State.
Toženec lahko vloži ugovor na evropski plačilni nalog ob uporabi standardnega obrazca, priloženega prilogi 3, ki ga prejme skupaj s pozivom k plačilu ali kako drugače.
The defendant may lodge a statement of opposition to the European order for payment by making use of the standard form attached to Annex 3 which shall be supplied to him together with the European order for payment or otherwise.
Toženec lahko vloži ugovor na evropski plačilni nalog ob uporabi standardnega obrazca, priloženega prilogi 3, ki je na voljo v vseh uradnih jezikih Skupnosti in ga prejme skupaj s pozivom k plačilu ali kako drugače.
The defendant may lodge a statement of opposition to the European order for payment by making use of the standard form attached to Annex 3 which shall be available in all official languages of the Community and supplied to him together with the European order for payment or otherwise.
Odgovor na tožbeni predlog, vložen po preteku roka, predpisanega v členu 6(3), vendar v roku, določenem v členu 9(3), ima pravni učinek ugovora .
A statement of defence lodged after the expiry of the time limit laid down in Article 6 (3) but within the time limit specified in Article 9 (3) shall produce the same effects as entering a statement of opposition.
Zaradi vzpostavitve skladnosti z enostopenjskim postopkom bi bilo treba člen 12(3) črtati.
In line with the one step procedure, for consistency paragraph 3 of Article 12 should be deleted.
Za vsa postopkovna vprašanja, ki jih ta uredba ne ureja izrecno, velja pravo države članice, v kateri poteka evropski postopek za plačilni nalog.
All procedural issues not specifically dealt with in this Regulation shall be governed by the law of the Member State in which the European order for payment proceedings take place.
Ne glede na to države članice ne smejo izkoriščati prednosti te določbe z uvedbo novih zahtev glede postopkov in dokazil, ki bi vodili v razvrednotenje evropskega plačilnega naloga.
However, in taking advantage of this provision Member States shall not seek to introduce further procedural or evidential requirements which would have the effect of undermining the European order for payment.
Poskus zagotovitve učinkovitega delovanja evropskega postopka za plačilni nalog.
Seeks to ensure effective operation of the European Payment Order procedure.
Člen 18 a (novo)
Article 18 a (new)
Člen 18a
Article 18a
Komisija pet let po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi podrobno poročilo o delovanju evropskega postopka za plačilni nalog.
Five years after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council a detailed report on the operation of the European order for payment procedure.
Poročilo vsebuje ekonomsko oceno načina delovanja in razširjeno presojo vpliva v vseh državah članicah, vključno z analizo stroškov in koristi morebitne razširitve na povsem nacionalne primere.
That report shall contain an economic assessment of the procedure as it has operated and an extended impact assessment for each Member State , including a cost-benefit analysis of the possible extension to purely national cases.
Če se v poročilu izkaže, da je postopek preprost, učinkovit in stoškovno ugoden ter omogoča učinkovito izterjavo, lahko Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predlog ukrepa za poenostavljeno uporabo evropskega postopka za plačilni nalog v državah članicah v nacionalnih primerih in s predlogi spremembe uredbe, potrebnimi v ta namen, ob upoštevanju zlasti izkušenj, dobljenih z uporabo postopka v čezmejnih primerih in v tistih državah članicah, kjer se postopek uporablja v nacionalnih primerih.
In the event that the report can demonstrate that the procedure is simple, efficient and cost-effective, and that it offers effective redress, the Commission may present a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council for a measure facilitating the use of the European order for payment procedure in Member States for national cases and proposing such amendments to this Regulation as are necessary to that end having regard in particular to the experience gained in using the procedure for cross-border cases and those Member States using the procedure for national cases.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o osnovanju evropskega postopka za plačilni nalog
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation creating a European order for payment procedure
Odbor za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve je bil zaprošen za mnenje glede predloga uredbe o osnovanju evropskega postopka za plačilni nalog.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs was asked for its opinion on the proposal for a Regulation creating a European order for payment procedure.
Na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Tampereju je bilo Svetu in Komisiji naloženo, naj pripravita ukrepe za okrepitev pravosodnega sodelovanja med državami članicami, med drugim tudi na področju poplačil nespornih terjatev.
At the European Council meeting in Tampere, the Council and the Commission were instructed to draw up measures to strengthen judicial cooperation between Member States, including in the area of payment of uncontested claims.
Uredba predvideva enostavnejši postopek izdaje plačilnega naloga, kar bo upnikom omogočilo hitrejše in lažje poplačilo denarnih terjatev.
The Regulation lays down a simpler procedure for issuing payment orders, which will make it faster and easier for creditors to receive payment of pecuniary claims.
Postopek bo temeljil na uporabi standardnih obrazcev med sodišči in strankami, kar bo omogočilo poenostavitev upravnih postopkov in elektronsko obdelavo podatkov.
The procedure will be based on the use of standard forms by courts and the parties involved, which will allow the administrative procedures and electronic data processing to be simplified.
Stališče pripravljavca mnenja
Draftsman’s opinion
Pripravljavec mnenja podpira predlagano uredbo, vendar bi želel glede vsebine izpostaviti naslednje:
The draftsman supports the proposed Regulation but draws attention to the following points with regard to its content:
Veljalo bi razmisliti, da bi se postopek uporabe uredbe uporabljal v čezmejnih primerih in nacionalnih primerih, z možnostjo države članice, da lahko uporabo uredbe omeji samo na čezmejne primere.
Consideration should be given to applying the procedure both in cross-border cases and national cases, with the possibility for Member States to limit application of the Regulation to cross-border cases only.
Predlagatelj v postopku za izdajo evropskega plačilnega naloga bi moral podati kratek opis vsaj enega dokaza in predlogu predložiti kopije relevantnih dokumentov.
In the procedure for issuing a European order for payment the claimant should present a brief description of at least one piece of evidence and enclose copies of the relevant documents with the application.
Prouči naj se možnost, da bi bil postopek za izdajo naloga enostopenjski.
The possibility of a single-stage procedure for issuing payment orders should be examined.
Evropski plačilni nalog izdan v eni državi članici naj bo izvršljiv v drugi državi članici brez odločbe o razglasitvi izvršljivosti v drugi državi članici.
A European order for payment issued in one Member State should be enforceable in another Member State without the need for a decision declaring it enforceable in the other Member State.
(8) Evropski postopek za plačilni nalog ne nadomešča ali usklajuje obstoječih mehanizmov za izterjavo nespornih terjatev po nacionalnem pravu, ampak predstavlja dodatno možnost za upnika, da uporablja postopek, ki ga zagotavlja nacionalna zakonodaja.
(8) The European order for payment procedure should not replace or harmonise the existing mechanisms for the recovery of uncontested debts under national law but constitute an additional option for the creditor who remains free to resort to a procedure provided by domestic law .
(8) Evropski postopek za plačilni nalog bo za fizične in pravne osebe po vsej EU ustvaril varen pravni okvir, ki bo zagotavljal enostaven postopek v čezmejnih primerih za pomoč čezmejni dejavnosti.
(8) The European order for payment procedure will create for natural and legal persons throughout the EU a secure legal framework providing a simplified procedure in cross-border cases to assist cross-border business.
Evropski postopek za plačilni nalog tako služi tudi kot model nacionalnih pravnih sistemov, še posebej tam, kjer takšni učinkoviti postopki še ne obstajajo.
In this way, the European order for payment procedure should also serve as a model for national legal systems, in particular where such efficient procedures do not yet exist .
S to uvodno izjavo sta jasno izpostavljena dva glavna cilja osnutka uredbe.
This recital clarifies that the present draft regulation serves mainly two purposes.
Državljani in mala in srednja podjetja se še vedno izogibajo tovrstnim transakcijam, ker nezadostno poznajo nacionalne pravne sisteme in dvomijo v možnost, da bi svoje terjatve v primeru nastalih problemov lahko dejansko in učinkovito uveljavili.
It can be assumed that even today citizens and small and medium-sized enterprises avoid such transactions because of ignorance of national legal systems and concerns over their ability to enforce their claims effectively in the event of problems occurring.
Na drugi strani bo uredba poleg takojšnjega področja uporabe služila kot model državam članicam Evropske unije, zlasti tistih, ki nimajo sistema plačilnega naloga, da znotraj nacionalnega pravnega sistema vzpostavijo postopek, ki bo državljanom in podjetjem prinašal hiter in učinkovit mehanizem izterjave nespornih terjatev.
On the other hand the Regulation – outside its immediate scope of application – will serve also as a model for the Member States of the European Union, particularly those which do not have an order for payment system, to provide within their national legal system a procedure which will be of benefit to citizens and companies in providing a fast and efficient mechanism to enforce uncontested claims.
Ta uredba se uporablja za civilne in gospodarske zadeve , ne glede na vrsto sodišča.
This Regulation shall apply in civil and commercial matters, whatever the nature of the court or tribunal.
Ne velja pa predvsem za dohodkovne , carinske ali upravne zadeve.
It shall not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters.
Ta uredba se uporablja v čezmejnih primerih za civilne in gospodarske zadeve , ne glede na vrsto sodišča.
This Regulation shall apply in cross-border cases to civil and commercial matters, whatever the nature of the court or tribunal.
Oblikuje se namreč ustrezen pravni okvir za njihove poslovne dejavnosti na notranjem evropskem trgu za primere izterjave nespornih terjatev.
An appropriate legal framework is created for their business activities in the European internal market when enforcing uncontested claims.
Če pa učinkoviti nacionalni postopki ne obstajajo, uredba lahko ponudi model za njihovo sprejetje.
Where there are no existing efficient national procedures, however, this Regulation can serve as a model for the adoption of national procedures.
S tem je pravna podlaga iz člena 61(c), v povezavi s členom 65 Pogodbe EU, ohranjena in uporabljena v celoti.
Thus the legal base of Article 61(c) in connection with Article 65 of EU-Treaty is used extensively and safeguarded.
(e) kratek opis vsaj enega dokazila, ki ga je mogoče v rednem civilnem postopku predložiti v podkrepitev zahtevka.
(e) the brief description of at least one means of evidence that could be adduced in ordinary civil proceedings to support the claim.
V luči učinkovitosti se je potrebno zavzemati za avtomatsko obdelavo podatkov, kar pomeni, da bi bilo dovolj, še posebej, ker gre za nesporne zahtevke, da upnik samo navede kakšen dokaz ima na voljo.
For the sake of efficiency, the use of automatic data processing is required, which means that it would be sufficient, particularly in the case of non-contentious claims, for the creditor merely to state the type of evidence he has.
Sodišče vlogo pregleda, če ustreza vsem pogojem iz uredbe, ne pregleduje pa samih dokazov.
The court would then examine the application and if it met all the requirements under the Regulation the court would not examine the evidence itself.
Dolžnik lahko vedno izrazi svoje nestrinjanje s postopkom.
The debtor would always be able to disagree with the procedure.
Člen 18(a) (novo)
Article 18 a (new)
Komisija pet let po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi poročilo.
Five years after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council..
Po petih letih se bo pokazalo, na podlagi izkušenj iz prakse, ali naj uredba velja tudi za primere, ko imata stranki prebivališče v isti državi.
After five years it will be clear from practical experience whether the Regulation should also apply to cases where the parties are domiciled in the same Member State.
V tem primeru naj Komisija pripravi spremembo direktive tako, da bo ta veljala tudi za nacionalne primere in ne samo za čezmejne primere.
In that case the Commission should draw up an amendment to the effect that it would apply to national cases as well as cross-border cases.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o osnovanju evropskega postopka za plačilni nalog
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation creating a European order for payment procedure
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi evropskega reda za plačilni postopek
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council creating a European order for payment procedure
člena 251(2) in 61(c) ES
Articles 251(2) and 61 (c) EC
Arlene McCarthy14.9.2004
Arlene McCarthy 14.9.2004
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Turčijo po širitvi Evropske unije
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Additional Protocol to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey following the enlargement of the European Union
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2005)0191 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0191 )
– ob upoštevanju besedila Sveta (9617/2005),
- having regard to the text of the Council (9617/2005),
– ob upoštevanju prošnje Sveta za privolitev v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3) v povezavi z členom 300(2), prvim pododstavkom, drugim stavkom, in členom 310 Pogodbe ES ( C6‑0194/2005 ),
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph, second sentence and Article 310 of the EC Treaty ( C6‑0194/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6‑0241/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0241/2005 ),
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Turčijo po širitvi Evropske unije
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Additional Protocol to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey following the enlargement of the European Union
drugi pododstavek člena 300(3), drugi stavek prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in člen 310 ES
Article 300(3), second subparagraph, 300(2), first subparagraph, second sentence and 310 EC
Niso dali mnenja
Not delivering opinion(s)
člen 43(1) 21.6.2005
Rule 43(1) 21.6.2005
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prisilnem licenciranju patentov v zvezi s proizvodnjo farmacevtskih izdelkov za izvoz v države s težavami v javnem zdravju
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compulsory licensing of patents relating to the manufacture of pharmaceutical products for export to countries with public health problems
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................31
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................33
MNENJE ODBORA ZA RAZVOJ ...........................................................................................35
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................37
MNENJE ODBORA ZA OKOLJE, JAVNO ZDRAVJE IN VARNO HRANO .......................47
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 52
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE ...........................................................................68
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................75
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu (KOM(2004) 0737)
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0737 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) ter členov 95 in 133 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerimi je Komisija predlog predložila Parlamentu ( C6‑0168/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 95 and 133 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0168/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in mnenja Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0242/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0242/2005 ),
(6) Ker je sistem prisilnega licenciranja, vzpostavljen s to uredbo, namenjen reševanju težav v javnem zdravju, bi se moral uporabljati v dobri veri.
(6) As the compulsory licensing system set up by this Regulation is intended to address public health problems, it should be used in good faith.
Ne bi se smel uporabljati z osnovnim namenom doseganja drugih ciljev in predvsem ciljev, ki so povsem komercialne narave .
It should not be used with the primary purpose of addressing other objectives, and in particular objectives of a purely commercial nature .
Ta uredba poskuša odvračati od sodnih postopkov v zvezi z vzpostavljenim sistemom .
This Regulation aims to discourage litigation with regard to the established system .
Osnutek uredbe ne predvideva nobene posebne spodbude za generična podjetja, da bi proizvajala v skladu s sistemom.
The draft Regulation does not provide any specific incentive that would encourage generic companies to produce under the system.
Ne more se pričakovati, da bodo trgovska podjetja izvedle naložbe, ki so nujne za razvoj kemije, oblikovala, proizvajala in razdeljevala zahtevane izdelke na nepridobitni podlagi.
It cannot be expected that commercial undertakings make the investments necessary to develop the chemistry, formulate, produce and distribute the required products on a non-profit basis.
Farmacevtska podjetja, ki sodelujejo v teh dejavnostih, dosegajo komercialne cilje na enak način kot podjetja, ki razvijajo nova zdravila.
Pharmaceutical companies involved in these activities pursue commercial objectives in the same way as companies developing new drugs.
Zato lahko celo najmanjši dodatni svarilni elementi morebiti odvrnejo generično industrijo od uporabe sistema.
Therefore, even minimal additional deterrent elements might eventually discourage the generic industry from using the system.
Da bi se odzvali na te razmere, je treba za izboljšanje tehnične sposobnosti teh držav ukrepe in dejavnosti izvajati čim hitreje.
In order to address this situation, measures should be implemented as soon as possible, with a view to improving the technical capacity of those countries.
Ker raziskave in razvoj v zvezi z zapostavljenimi boleznimi niso ekonomsko uspešni, se večinoma usmerjajo proti zahodnemu svetu, kar povzroča neenakosti med razvitimi in revnimi državami.
As research and development in the field of neglected diseases is not commercially viable, R&D is mainly geared towards the Western world, widening the inequality between developed and poor countries.
Evropska unija mora izraziti jasen politični znak.
It is important for the European Union to give a clear political signal.
Prenos tehnologije v države v razvoju in v manj napredne države je zapisan v sklepu z dne 30. avgusta, vendar ga Uredba ne povzema.
The desirability of the transfer of technology to developing and least‑developed countries is set out in the Decision of 30 August, but not incorporated in the regulation.
(7) Izdelki, proizvedeni v skladu s to uredbo, bi morali doseči tiste, ki izdelke potrebujejo, in ne bi smeli biti preusmerjeni od tistih, katerim so namenjeni.
(7) Products manufactured pursuant to this Regulation should reach those who need them and should not be diverted from those for whom they were intended.
Zato bi morale prisilne licence, izdane po tej uredbi, pridobitelju licence naložiti jasne pogoje glede aktov, ki jih zajema licenca, opredelitve farmacevtskih izdelkov, proizvedenih po licenci, in držav, v katere se bodo ti izdelki izvozili;
Compulsory licences issued under this Regulation should therefore impose clear conditions upon the licensee as regards the acts covered by the licence, the identification of the pharmaceutical products manufactured under the licence and the countries to which these products will be exported.
(7) Izdelki, proizvedeni v skladu s to uredbo, morajo doseči samo tiste, ki izdelke potrebujejo, in ne smejo biti preusmerjeni od tistih, katerim so namenjeni.
(7) Products manufactured pursuant to this Regulation must reach only those who need them and should not be diverted from those for whom they were intended.