natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
J. ker se v nekaterih novih državah članicah javno-zasebna partnerstva uporabljajo zlasti za poskus prikrivanja naraščanja državnega dolga, za katerega veljajo maastrichtski kriteriji; je zaskrbljen, ker so lahko v takšnih primerih zaradi izravnave izgub zaradi manjše kupne moči na notranjem trgu dajatve za poplačilo za zasebne vlagatelje višje od običajnih stopenj državnih posojil, ki so na voljo za vzpostavitev enakih subjektov;
J. whereas in some new Member States, the PPP formula is chosen to attempt to disguise the increase in the public debt, which is subject to the Maastricht criteria; expresses concern that in these cases, the compensation for the private investor for losses originating from the low domestic purchasing power can result in a higher repayment fee than the ordinary instalment of the state guaranteed loans taken up for the construction of the same facilities;
K. ker je sodna praksa Sodišča v zvezi s pravnim statusom občinskih interesnih združenj in dejavnostmi, ki jih ta nadzorujejo kot neposredni naročniki in ponudniki storitev lokalnim organom, v katerih sodelujejo, pogosto nenatančna,
K. whereas the case law of the Court of Justice is consistently vague as to the legal status of local authorities’ agencies (‘intercommunales’) and the activities they control, both as direct contracting authorities and as service providers to their constituent local authorities,
L. ker splošna načela prava Skupnosti ne zagotavljajo pravne varnosti institucionalnih javno-zasebnih partnerstev,
L. having regard to the uncertain legal status of institutionalised PPPs under the general principles of Community law,
3. podpira predlog Komisije, da si je treba na področju koncesij prizadevati za zakonodajno pobudo, ki jasno ločuje med koncesijami in javnimi naročili, potem ko bo opravljena presoja vplivov;
Supports the Commission proposal to work towards a legislative initiative on the award of concessions, drawing a clear distinction between concessions and public procurement contracts, once the requisite impact assessment has been completed;
8. nasprotuje posebnim predpisom za oddajo naročil pod mejno vrednostjo, saj to sodi v pristojnost držav članic, ki bi morale biti tudi v prihodnje odgovorne za ureditev tega področja;
Is opposed to separate arrangements for awards below the threshold value, since these are a matter for the Member States, which should continue to deal with them within their own jurisdictions;
13. zahteva natančno opredelitev pojma „podoben nadzor“, ki ga izvaja naročnik nad ponudnikom storitev, zlasti kadar mešana gospodarska podjetja opravljajo storitve za račun in v okviru javnih naročil naročnika, ki jih financira ali zanje jamči;
Calls for a more precise definition of the concept of ‘similar control’, which the organising public authority exercises over the service provider, particularly in cases where semi-public companies provide, on behalf of the organising public authority and in connection with the performance of its tasks, services that are mainly funded or underwritten by the organising public authority;
17. meni po podrobnem preučevanju, da mejna vrednost – kakršnakoli že je – za minimalno udeležbo javnega naročnika v skupnem podjetju z zasebniki omogoča trajnosten varnostni mehanizem, zato se pri vsaki razpravi o mejni vrednosti pojavijo težave;
Considers, after mature reflection, that a threshold value, however defined, for the minimum stake of a public contracting authority in a company whose capital is held jointly with private partners would make for permanent protected spheres and that any limit put forward for discussion consequently poses problems;
23. meni, da nalog, ki so bile uspešno opravljene z udeležbo zasebnega kapitala, ni smiselno znova prepustiti občinskim organom, saj to ni ustrezno nadomestilo za javno-zasebna partnerstva, ki delujejo po načelu konkurence;
Is of the opinion that when tasks have been satisfactorily carried out with the assistance of private partners, restoring them to the municipal sphere of responsibility cannot constitute a sound alternative to PPPs consistent with competition principles;
26. kljub temu se zavzema za to, da morajo biti interni posli predmet javnega razpisa, če naloge izvaja samostojno hčerinsko podjetje oziroma če to sklepa posle s tretjimi strankami.
Recommends, however, that in-house matters must be put up for tender when the tasks in question are carried out by independent subsidiaries or when such subsidiaries engage in outside business.
Javno-zasebna partnerstva in zakonodaja Skupnosti o javnih naročilih in koncesijah
Public-private partnerships and Community law on public procurement and concessions
o javno-zasebnih partnerstvih in zakonodaji Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil in koncesij
on public-private partnerships and Community law on public procurement and concessions
Odbor za promet in turizem poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ob upoštevanju strateške potrebe po posodobitvi infrastrukture Unije, zlasti prometne infrastrukture, storitev in logistike - od obsežnih omrežij kot je TEN-T do posameznih delov infrastrukture kot so pristanišča in letališča, logistične platforme in platforme za modalno izmenjavo, ter tistih, ki so povezani z urbanim prevozom (parkirišča za avtomobile, lokalne železnice, tramvajske proge, podzemne železnice, avtobusi in storitve lokalnega javnega prevoza) - ki zaradi svojih ogromnih finančnih razsežnosti vse bolj pritiskajo na proračune držav članic,
A. having regard to the strategic need to update the infrastructure of the Union and especially transport infrastructure and services and logistics – from large-scale networks such as TEN-T to specific ones such as ports and airports, logistics platforms and modal interchange platforms, and those related to urban transport (car parks, local railways, tramlines, underground systems, buses and local public transport services) – which, because of their huge financial dimension, place increasing pressure on Member States' budgets,
B. ker na primer velikih finančnih potreb - le-te presegajo lastna sredstva Skupnosti - infrastrukturnih projektov TEN-T v naslednjih letih, ocenjenih na 600 milijard EUR do leta 2020 (vključno z 225 milijardami EUR za 30 prednostnih projektov, od tega 140 milijard EUR v obdobju 2007–2013), ni mogoče zadovoljiti brez črpanja iz različnih virov ter vključitve cele vrste pravnih in fizičnih oseb in subjektov s finančnim spodbujanjem v obliki subvencij Skupnosti,
B. having regard, for example, to the huge financing needs - beyond the Community's own resources - in the forthcoming years of the TEN-T infrastructure projects, which are estimated at EUR 600 billion in the period up to 2020 (including EUR 225 billion for the 30 priority projects of which EUR 140 billion in the period 2007-2013), which needs cannot be met except by drawing on a variety of sources involving a wide range of public and private persons and bodies via the financial incentive of Community grants,
C. ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi splošnih pravil za dodeljevanje finančne pomoči Skupnosti na področju vseevropskih prometnih in energetskih omrežij ( KOM(2004)0475 ), katerega namen je spodbujanja javnih naložb v sektor z zvišanjem stopnje sofinanciranja Skupnosti,
C. having regard to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council determining the general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport networks and energy ( COM(2004)0475 ), which was designed to encourage public investment in the sector by increasing the Community cofinancing rate,
D. ob upoštevanju z leti pridobljenih izkušenj z javno-zasebnim partnerstvom, tako "pogodbenim" kot "institucionaliziranim", v nekaterih državah članicah, zlasti na področju transportnih projektov in še posebej prek na koncesijah temelječih javno-zasebnih partnerstev, kot načinov, s katerimi javni organi zagotovijo čim večjo vrednost denarja iz javnih virov in delijo tveganje z zasebnimi partnerji,
D. having regard to the experience of public private partnership - both 'contractual' and 'institutional' - gained over the years in some Member States, in particular in the field of transport projects and particularly through concession-based PPPs, as a means for public authorities to optimise the value for money of public resources and share risks with private partners,
E. ker ima ta pojav različne oblike, ki vsakič posebej zahtevajo uporabo posebnih načel in pravil Skupnosti, na podlagi česar je že nastala vrsta pravil, ki zahtevajo nek začetni okvir, čeprav bi jih bilo dobro pustiti, da se razvijajo,
E. whereas this phenomenon assumes various forms, which increasingly involve the application of specific Community principles and rules, and has produced a set of rules which call for an initial framework, although they should be left to evolve,
F. ker javno-zasebna partnerstva lahko prispevajo in tudi morajo prispevati k izboljšavi kakovosti in stalnosti javnih služb s pomočjo ukrepov, namenjenih delitvi tveganj med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem,
F. whereas public-private partnerships can and must help to improve the quality and continuity of public service by means of arrangements for sharing risks between the public and private sectors,
G. ker je treba, če hočemo zagotoviti, da se izdatek za prometno infrastrukturo razporedi čimbolj učinkovito in uspešno, spodbujati čim širše sodelovanje zasebnega sektorja pri načrtovanju, izgradnji ter upravljanju in financiranju infrastruktur s preglednimi javnimi razpisi, natečaji in postopki oddaje naročil,
G. whereas, in order to ensure that expenditure on transport infrastructure is deployed as effectively and efficiently as possible, it is necessary in any event to promote the widest possible private sector participation in the planning, construction, management and funding of infrastructures by means of transparent invitation to tender, tendering and contract award procedures,
H. ob upoštevanju, da Eurostat določi način, kako so porazdeljene glavne vrste tveganj (povezanih z izgradnjo, razpoložljivostjo, povpraševanjem) kot merilo za določanje vpliva projektov javno-zasebnih partnerstev na nacionalne račune,
H. whereas Eurostat identifies the way in which the main categories of risk (construction risk, availability risk and demand risk) are apportioned as the criterion for determining the impact of PPP projects on Member States' national accounts,
I. ker se v javno-zasebnih partnerstvih lahko zgodi, da javna podjetja in organizacije niso upravičeni do prejemanja subvencij Skupnosti, ker ne nosijo stroškov izgradnje, zasebna podjetja in organizacije pa niso upravičeni do istih subvencij, ker prejemajo „plačila, ki temeljijo na razpoložljivosti“ za pokritje stroškov izgradnje,
I. whereas, in PPPs, public undertakings and bodies may not be eligible for Community grants because they do not bear construction costs, while private undertakings and bodies may not be eligible for the same grants because they receive 'availability payments' to cover construction costs,
J. ob upoštevanju, da se lahko faze načrtovanja, odločanja in gradnje projektov TEN nadaljujejo onkraj finančnega okvira, v skladu s katerim so subvencije dane na voljo,
J. whereas the planning, decision, and construction phases of TEN projects may continue well beyond the financial framework under which grants are made available,
3. meni, da je v primeru pogodbenih javno-zasebnih partnerstev pred uvajanjem projektov javno-zasebnega partnerstva v javni sektor potrebno opraviti predhodno primerjavo na področju javnega sektorja in analizo stroškovne učinkovitosti; meni tudi, da bi moral pri kategoriji javno-zasebnih partnerstev, ki bi jo bilo treba razumeti v širšem smislu koncesij, s čemer bi vključevala pogodbe, katerih predmet je zagotavljanje javnih storitev, ki zahtevajo izvajanje infrastrukturnih del in pri katerih večji del koncesionarjevega dobička izhaja iz neposrednih plačil s strani javnih organov, pravni instrument, ki določa smernice, obravnavati fazo izbire zasebnega pogodbenika in da bi moral standardizirati več primerov najboljše prakse (ki pa ne bi bili zavezujoči) za javne organe in zasebne izvajalce; omenjene smernice bi morale tudi določiti načela, veljavna za pogodbeni okvir po oddaji pogodbe, pri čemer bi morale uporabiti normativen pristop in navesti, katere vrste ravnanja ali pogodbenih določb so ali bi lahko bile v nasprotju z načeli zakonodaje Skupnosti; meni tudi, da bi morale te smernice prispevati k dobro uravnoteženi in pravični delitvi dobička in tveganja med javnimi in zasebnimi partnerji, ter preprečevati nesprejemljivo oškodovanje javnosti; nazadnje bi morala Komisija zagotoviti primere najboljših praks v zvezi z delitvijo tveganja med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem;
Considers that, in the case of contractual PPPs, a prior public sector comparator and a value for money analysis are necessary for the public sector when launching a PPP project; considers furthermore that this category of PPPs, which should be understood in the wider sense of concessions, so as to include contracts whose object is the provision of public services requiring the carrying out of infrastructure works and where the majority of the concessionaire's revenues derives from direct payments by public authorities, the legal instrument which defines the guidelines should address the stage of the selection of the private contractor and should standardise several examples of best practice - which should not, however, be binding - for public authorities and private operators; considers that these guidelines should also set out the principles which are applicable to the contractual framework following the awarding of the contract, by taking a proscriptive approach and indicating which kinds of conduct or contractual provisions conflict, or risk conflicting with the principles of Community law; futher considers that these guidelines should contribute to a well-balanced and fair share of profit and risk between public and private partners, preventing unacceptable damage to the public; lastly, considers that the Commission should provide examples of best practice in risk sharing between the public and private sectors;
7. izraža upanje, da bodo nacionalni računovodski ukrepi glede pogodb javno-zasebnih partnerstev olajšali financiranje posodabljanja infrastrukture EU ob spoštovanju maastrichtskih obvez o primanjkljaju in dolgu (izjava za javnost STAT/STAT/18);
Hopes that the national accounting arrangements for public-private partnership contracts may facilitate the financing of the EU's updating of infrastructure, albeit whilst respecting the Maastricht deficit and debt commitments (press release STAT/STAT/18);
9. zahteva, da Komisija z izvajanjem nadzora Skupnosti nad državno pomočjo zagotovi, da pri dodeljevanju subvencij ne bo razlikovanja med izvajalci, ne glede na to, ali so zasebni, javni ali poljavni;
Calls on the Commission to ensure, by exercising Community control over State aid, that the granting of subsidies does not involve any discrimination between operators, whether private, public or a mixture of the two;
12. spodbuja Komisijo in Evropsko investicijsko banko, da združita svoje strokovno znanje in ga razširita zlasti v tiste države, kjer javni organi niso seznanjeni z javno-zasebnim partnerstvom;
Encourages the Commission and the European Investment Bank to gather together their expertise and disseminate it especially in those countries where the authorities are not familiar with PPPs;
Javno-zasebna partnerstva in zakonodaja Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil in koncesij
Public-private partnerships and Community law on public procurement and concessions
Nadomeščeni/-a pripravljavec/-ka mnenja
Previous drafts (wo)man
o javno-zasebnih partnerstvih in zakonodaji Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil in koncesij
on Public-Private Partnerships and Community law on public procurement and concessions
Odbor za razvoj poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker se proračun EU nenehno zmanjšuje, število nalog, s katerimi se srečuje regionalni razvoj, pa je vedno večje, postaja zato pridobivanje zasebnih sredstev vedno bolj pomembno,
A. whereas the EU budget is continually decreasing while the number of tasks facing regional development is ever greater and the acquisition of private resources is thus becoming increasingly important,
B. ker je mogoče finančna sredstva za regionalne razvojne cilje povečati z uporabo javno-zasebnih partnerstev, glede na pozitivne izkušnje nekaterih držav članic,
B. whereas it is possible to increase funding for regional development objectives through public-private partnerships (PPPs), drawing on the positive experiences of some Member States,
C. ker javno-zasebna partnerstva javnim subjektom omogočajo, da koristijo strokovno znanje zasebnih podjetij in uporabo mehanizmov za porazdelitev tveganja med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem ter lahko vodijo do višjega standarda in večje kontinuitete javnih storitev, kot tudi do zmanjšanja stroškov izvajanja nalog in prihranka sredstev iz omejenih virov, ki so na voljo za take dejavnosti,
C. whereas PPPs enable public entities to benefit from the expertise of private firms and the use of mechanisms for the distribution of risk between the public and private sectors and can lead to a higher standard and better continuity of public services as well as a reduction in the cost of carrying out tasks and savings in the limited resources available for such activities,
D. ker javno-zasebna partnerstva še vedno niso splošno znana in ker potrebujemo za odpravljanje obstoječih dvomov jasna in pregledna pravila ravnanja ter strokovna znanja, povezana predvsem z dejavnostmi javnih subjektov in podjetij,
D. whereas the PPP formula is still not widely known and whereas, in order to overcome the doubts which exist, clear and transparent rules of conduct and expertise in this area are needed, with particular reference to the activities of public entities and businesses,
2. čestita Komisiji za organizacijo javnega posvetovanja, ki je potekalo v okviru te zelene knjige, in meni, da je bistveno slišati mnenja različnih zadevnih partnerjev na regionalni in lokalni ravni;
Congratulates the Commission on the public consultation undertaken through this Green Paper, regarding it as fundamental that the views of the various partners concerned, including at regional and local level be heard;
Direktiva 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev (UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str.
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p.
114). čim prej odpravi pravna negotovost v internih opredelitvah, nastala s sodbami Sodišča ES
114). ; demands that all legal measures should be geared towards facilitating the start-up of institutionalised PPPs;
"Parking Brixen" (C-458/03) Sodba Sodišča z dne 13. oktobra 2005 v zadevi Parking Brixen GmbH proti Gemeinde Brixen, Stadtwerke Brixen AG, zbirka 2005, str.
Calls on the Commission to set up as a matter of urgency and in collaboration with the European Investment Bank a European PPP Expertise Centre, based where possible on existing structures, for regular evaluations of the progress and results of PPP, the dissemination of expertise and the exchange of information on experience concerning best practice in PPP set-ups in various sectors, in all official EU languages, which will be reported to the Community institutions and from which Member States as well as local and regional authorities will be able to benefit;
"Coname proti Comune di Cingiea de' Botti" (C-231/03) Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. julija 2005 v zadevi Consorzio Aziende Metano (Coname) proti Comune di Cingia de' Botti, zbirka 2005, str.
Considers it necessary, in the context of the proposed European PPP Expertise Centre, to draw up standard projects concerning situations that frequently arise and in which PPPs give the best results; these standard projects, together with a catalogue of best practices from the Member States, would be of great help, particularly to those Member States that have trepidations about making use of PPPs;
8. meni, da je v zvezi z javno-zasebnimi partnerstvi bistveno, da se zasebni kapital kot del nacionalnih prispevkov vključi v strukturne sklade v vseh državah članicah in da se javno-zasebna partnerstva doda na seznam upravičencev teh skladov, kar bo izboljšalo zlasti možnosti revnejših regij;
Considers it essential with regard to PPPs to include private capital as part of national contributions to the Structural Funds in all Member States and to add PPPs to the list of beneficiaries under these Funds, which will lead to greater development in all regions;
Javno-zasebna partnerstva in zakonodaja Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil in koncesij
Public-Private Partnerships and Community law on public procurement and concessions
o tematski strategiji za varstvo in ohranjanje morskega okolja
on a Thematic Strategy on the Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment
PE 374.344v01-00
PE 374.344v02-00
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o tematski strategiji za varstvo in ohranjanje morskega okolja ( KOM(2005)0504 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on a Thematic Strategy on the Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment ( COM(2005)0504 ),
– ob upoštevanju šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa Skupnosti
– having regard to the 6th Community Environment Action Programme (EAP)
– ob upoštevanju predloga direktive o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju politike morskega okolja (Direktiva o morski strategiji) ( KOM(2005)0505 - 2005/0211(COD) ,
– having regard to the proposal for a directive establishing a framework for Community action in the field of marine environmental policy (the Marine Strategy Directive) ( COM(2005)0505 - 2005/0211(COD) ,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike
– having regard to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy
1. (okvirna direktiva o vodah), katere cilji so med drugim prispevati k varstvu ozemeljskih in morskih voda ter preprečevanje in odprava morskega onesnaževanja,
1. (the Water Framework Directive), whose objectives include contributing to the protection of territorial and marine waters and the prevention and elimination of marine pollution,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. junija 2003
– having regard to its resolution of 19 June 2003
141. o sporočilu Komisije "Razvoj strategije za varstvo in ohranjanje morskega okolja" ( KOM(2002)0539 ),
141. on the Commission communication "Towards a strategy to protect and conserve the marine environment" ( COM(2002)0539 ),
– ob upoštevanju najnovejšega Poročila o stanju okolja Evropske agencije za okolje, objavljenega leta 2005,
– having regard to the latest State of the Environment Report of the European Environment Agency (EEA), published in 2005,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o politiki Inštituta za evropsko okoljsko politiko (IEEP)
– having regard to the policy briefing by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP)
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije ZN o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu (UNCLOS),
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS),