natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2), člena 149(4) in člena 150(4) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0142/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 149(4) and 150(4) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0142/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6‑0261/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0261/2005 ),
(1) Čeprav je bilo izvajanje Priporočila Sveta z dne 24. septembra 1998 o evropskem sodelovanju pri zagotavljanju kakovosti v visokem šolstvu zelo uspešno, kar je razvidno iz poročila Komisije z dne 30. septembra 2004 (KOM (2004)0620) , pa še vedno obstaja potreba po izboljšanju delovanja evropskega visokega šolstva , zlasti glede visoke ravni kakovosti, da bi to postalo preglednejše in še bolj zanesljivo v očeh evropskih državljanov ter študentov in univerzitetnih delavcev z drugih celin.
(1) although the implementation of the Council recommendation of 24 September 1998 on European cooperation in quality assurance in higher education has been a marked success as demonstrated in the report of the Commission of 30 September 2004 ( COM( 2004)0620) , there is still a need to improve the performance of European higher education , particularly as regards quality, for it to become more transparent and trustworthy for European citizens and for students and scholars from other continents.
Evropsko sodelovanje za zagotavljanje kakovosti v visokošolskem izobraževanju mora v prvi vrsti prispevati k zvišanju ravni kakovosti visokega šolstva v državah članicah.
European cooperation on quality assurance in higher education must contribute in the first instance to enhancing the quality of higher education in the Member States.
To je treba posebej omeniti že v prvi uvodni izjavi.
This should be mentioned straight away in the first recital.
(3) Priporočilo Sveta poziva k upoštevanju nekaterih bistvenih izhodišč za vzpostavitev sistema zagotavljanja kakovosti, kar vključuje programsko in institucionalno notranjo evalvacijo, zunanji pregled, sodelovanje študentov, objavo rezultatov in mednarodno udeležbo.
(3) the Council Recommendation called for quality assurance systems to be based on a series of essential features, including evaluation of programmes or institutions through internal assessment, external review, and involving the participation of students, publication of results and international participation.
Te rezultate bi bilo treba sistematično nadalje obdelati, saj so osnova za naslednjo ciklično evalvacijo.
These results should be systematically processed and used as a basis for the next round of assessments.
Rezultati notranjega in zunanjega zagotavljanja kakovosti morajo tvoriti osnovo za neprekinjeno izboljševanje ustanov.
The results of the internal and external quality assurance must form the foundation for the continuous improvement of institutions.
Biti morajo podlaga za sistematičen razvoj kulture kakovosti in prilagajanja spremenljivim potrebam družbe.
They should serve as a basis for a systematic development of quality culture and adaptation to the changing needs of society.
(6) Ministri za šolstvo, zbrani septembra 2003 v Berlinu, „pozivajo ENQA, naj preko svojih članic in v sodelovanju z EUA, EURASHE, in ESIB pripravi dogovorjeni niz standardov, postopkov in smernic za zagotavljanje kakovosti, da poiščejo poti za vzpostavitev ustreznega sistema kolegialnega pregleda agencij ali teles za zagotavljanje kakovosti in/ali akreditacijo ter da o tem leta 2005 poročajo ministrom preko Skupine za spremljanje Procesa.“
(6) Ministers of education, gathered in Berlin, in September 2003, “ called upon ENQA through its members, in co-operation with the EUA, EURASHE and ESIB, to develop an agreed set of standards, procedures and guidelines on quality assurances, to explore ways of ensuring an adequate peer review for quality assurance and/or accreditation agencies or bodies, and to report back through the Follow-up Group to Ministers in 2005 ” .
Pozdravili so tudi načelo evropskega registra agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti, ki temelji na nacionalnem nadzoru, in pozvali ENQUA, naj v sodelovanju z EUA, EURASHE in ESIB še naprej razvija njegovo praktično izvajanje.
They also welcomed the principle of a European register of quality assurance agencies based on national review and asked that the practicalities of implementation be further developed by ENQA, in cooperation with EUA, EURASHE and ESIB.
Poleg tega so zaradi izboljšanja vzajemnega priznavanja odločitev o akreditaciji ali zagotavljanju kakovosti podčrtali pomen sodelovanja med nacionalno priznanimi agencijami.
They furthermore underlined the importance of cooperation between nationally recognised agencies with a view to enhancing the mutual recognition of accreditation or quality assurance decisions.
(7) Zaželeno bi bilo sestaviti pozitivni seznam ali register neodvisnih in zanesljivih agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti, ki delujejo v Evropi, neodvisno od tega ali gre za regionalne ali nacionalne, splošne ali specializirane, javne ali privatne, profitne ali neprofitne , da bi se povečala preglednost v visokem šolstvu in pomagalo pri priznavanju kvalifikacij in obdobja študija v tujini.
(7) It is desirable to draw up a positive list or register of independent and trustworthy quality assurance agencies operating in Europe, be they regional or national, general or specialised, public or private, profit-making or not for profit, to support transparency in higher education and help the recognition of qualifications and periods of study abroad.
(7) Zaželeno bi bilo sestaviti seznam ali register neodvisnih in zanesljivih agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti, ki delujejo v Evropi, neodvisno od tega ali gre za regionalne ali nacionalne, splošne ali specializirane, javne ali privatne, da bi se povečala preglednost v visokem šolstvu in pomagalo pri priznavanju kvalifikacij in obdobja študija v tujini.
(7) It is desirable to draw up a list or register of independent and trustworthy quality assurance agencies operating in Europe, be they regional or national, general or specialised, public or private, to support transparency in higher education and help the recognition of qualifications and periods of study abroad.
Izraz "pozitivni seznam" nakazuje, da ima register pravno vrednost, ki ni zaželena.
The expression 'positive list' suggests that the register has some legal value, which is not desirable.
Oddelek I, Priporočilo A
Section I, Recommendation A
A. da od vseh visokošolskih zavodov dejavnih na svojem ozemlju zahtevajo uvedbo ali razvoj strogih notranjih mehanizmov zagotavljanja kakovosti.
A. require all higher education institutions active within their territory to introduce or develop rigorous internal quality assurance mechanisms.
A. da v skladu s standardi in smernicami za zagotavljanje kakovosti na področju evropskega visokega šolstva, sprejetimi v Bergnu v smislu Bolonjskega procesa, od vseh visokošolskih zavodov dejavnih na svojem ozemlju zahtevajo uvedbo ali razvoj strogih notranjih mehanizmov zagotavljanja kakovosti .
A. require all higher education institutions active within their territory to introduce or develop rigorous internal quality assurance mechanisms , in accordance with the standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area adopted in Bergen in the context of the Bologna Process.
Oddelek I, Priporočilo B
Section I, Recommendation B
B. da od vseh agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo, dejavnih na njihovem ozemlju, zahtevajo neodvisnost pri ocenjevanju, upoštevanje izhodišč za zagotavljanje kakovosti iz Priporočila Sveta iz septembra 1998 in uporabo skupnega niza standardov, postopkov in smernic za ocenjevanje.
B. require all quality assurance or accreditation agencies active within their territory to be independent in their assessments, to apply the features of quality assurance laid down in the Council Recommendation of September 1998 and to apply a common set of standards, procedures and guidelines, for assessment purposes.
B. da od vseh agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo, dejavnih na njihovem ozemlju, zahtevajo neodvisnost pri ocenjevanju, upoštevanje izhodišč za zagotavljanje kakovosti iz Priporočila Sveta iz septembra 1998 in uporabo skupnega niza splošnih standardov in smernic za ocenjevanje , sprejetih v Bergnu.
B. require all quality assurance or accreditation agencies active within their territory to be independent in their assessments, to apply the features of quality assurance laid down in the Council Recommendation of September 1998 and to apply the common set of general standards and guidelines adopted in Bergen , for assessment purposes.
Te standarde je treba oblikovati v sodelovanju s predstavniki skupnosti visokega šolstva.
These standards should be devised in cooperation with representatives of the higher education community.
Uporabljati jih je treba tako, da varujejo in spodbujajo raznolikost ter inovativnost, zlasti s tem, da se univerzam prizna pravica do ponudbe kakovostnih programov, ki so drugačni ali bolj inovativni od standardnih.
They should be applied in such a way as to protect and promote diversity and innovation, in particular by acknowledging universities' right to offer quality programmes that are different or more innovative than standard programmes.
Rezultate zunanjega ocenjevanja je treba dosledno obdelovati in uporabljati kot osnovo za naslednji krog ocenjevanja .
The results of external evaluations should be systematically processed and used as a basis for the next round of assessments.
Oddelek I, Priporočilo C
Section I, Recommendation C
C. da agencije za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo spodbudijo, naj skupaj z organizacijami, ki predstavljajo visoko šolstvo , vzpostavijo „Evropski register agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo“, kakor je opisano v Prilogi, in opredelijo pogoje za registracijo.
C. encourage quality assurance and accreditation agencies , together with organisations representing higher education, to set up a “European Register of Quality Assurance and Accreditation Agencies”, as described in the Annex, and to define the conditions for registration.
C. da predstavnike agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo, sektor visokega šolstva in nacionalne organe spodbudijo, naj vzpostavijo „Evropski register agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo“ na temelju nacionalnega ocenjevanja , kakor je opisano v Prilogi, in opredelijo pogoje za registracijo ter pravila za vodenje registra .
C. encourage representatives of quality assurance and accreditation agencies, the higher education sector and national authorities to set up a “European Register of Quality Assurance and Accreditation Agencies”, based on the national assessment, as described in the Annex, to define the conditions for registration and the rules for the management of the register.
Oddelek I, Priporočilo D
Section I, Recommendation D
D. da omogočijo vsem visokošolskim zavodom na svojem ozemlju, da med agencijami za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo iz Evropskega registra same izberejo tisto , ki ustreza njihovim potrebam in profilu.
D. enable higher education institutions active within their territory to choose among quality assurance or accreditation agencies in the European Register, an agency which meets their needs and profile.
D. da omogočijo vsem visokošolskim zavodom na svojem ozemlju, da za podelitev licenc iz Evropskega registra v svoji ali v drugi državi, če je to v njihovi državi s predpisi ali namenskim sporazumom z ustreznim ministrstvom dovoljeno, same izberejo agencijo, ki ustreza njihovim potrebam in profilu.
D. enable higher education institutions active within their territory to choose , for licensing purposes, an agency in the European Register in their own country or –provided this is permitted in their own country by a set of rules or agreement to this effect with the relevant ministry– in another country , which meets their needs and profile.
To velja zlasti za programe skupnih ali dvojnih diplom.
This should be the case particularly for joint / dual degree programmes.
Oddelek I, Priporočilo E
Section I, Recommendation E
E. da sprejemajo ocene vseh agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo iz Evropskega registra in na tej podlagi sprejemajo odločitve o podelitvi licenc ali financiranju visokošolskih zavodov, vključno s podeljevanjem štipendij in študentskih posojil.
E. accept the assessments made by all quality assurance and accreditation agencies listed in the European Register as a basis for decisions on licensing or funding of higher education institutions, including as regards such matters as eligibility for student grants and loans.
Predlog spremembe omogoča boljšo povezanost besedila.
Amendment aimed at consistency.
Zaradi razlikovanja med podeljevanjem licenc in dodatnim ocenjevanjem/akreditacijo, podanega v novih točkah D in E, je prvotno besedilo neprimerno.
The distinction drawn in the new points D and E between licensing and complementary assessment / accreditation makes the original text unnecessary.
Oddelek I, Priporočilo E a (novo)
Section I, Recommendation E a (new)
Ea. da spodbujajo visokošolske ustanove k prizadevanjem za dodatno nadnacionalno ocenjevanje oz. akreditacijo prek agencij iz Evropskega registra, da bi utrdile svoj mednarodni sloves.
Ea. encourage higher education institutions to work towards a complementary trans-national assessment or accreditation by an agency in the European register, with a view to boosting their international reputation.
Treba je izrecno poudariti, da morajo visokošolske ustanove stremeti k dodatni akreditaciji oz. ocenjevanju prek mednarodne agencije iz Evropskega registra, države članice pa jo morajo ustrezno spodbujati.
It needs to be stressed that higher education establishments need to strive towards – and accordingly the Member States to promote – additional accreditation or assessment by an international agency on the European register.
Oddelek I, točka E b (novo)
Section I, Recommendation E b (new)
Eb. spodbujanje sodelovanja med agencijami z namenom vzpostavitve medsebojnega zaupanja in vzajemnega priznavanja in s tem poenostavitve priznavanja njihovih kvalifikacij za namene študija ali dela v drugi državi, tudi na področjih, ki vodijo v regulirane poklice.
Eb . promote cooperation between agencies in order to build up mutual trust and recognition among themselves, thus facilitating the recognition of their qualifications for the purpose of study or work in another country including in areas leading to regulated professions.
Oddelek I, Priporočilo E (c) (novo)
Section I, Recommendation E c (new)
Ec. spodbujanje držav k članic k objavi in zagotavljanju javnega dostopa do ocen agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo, ki so navedene v Evropskem registru.
Ec . encourage publicity for, and ensure public access to, the assessments made by the quality assurance or accreditation agencies, listed in the European register.
Objavljanje ocen agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo bi prispevalo k boljši obveščenosti o visokošolskih zavodih in njihovi večji preglednosti.
Making public the results of the assessements of the quality assurance or accreditation agencies would contribute to better information and transparency for higher education institutions.
Priloga, Točka 1
Annex, Point 1
Seznam naj sestavijo predstavniki agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo držav članic, predstavniki s področja visokega šolstva (univerze in visokošolski zavodi zunaj univerz, študenti, univerzitetni učitelji in raziskovalci) ter socialni partnerji.
The list should be drawn up by representatives of quality assurance and accreditation agencies active in the Member States, together with representatives of the higher education sector (universities and non university higher education, students, university teachers and researchers) and social partners.
Seznam naj sestavijo predstavniki nacionalnih organov in agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo držav članic, predstavniki s področja visokega šolstva (univerze in visokošolski zavodi zunaj univerz, študenti, univerzitetni učitelji in raziskovalci) ter socialni partnerji.
The list should be drawn up by representatives of the national authorities and quality assurance and accreditation agencies active in the Member States, together with representatives of the higher education sector (universities and non university higher education, students, university teachers and researchers) and social partners.
Priloga, Točka 2, tretja alinea
Annex, Point 2, indent 3
– delovanje na podlagi skupnega niza standardov, postopkov in smernic, omenjenih v oddelku 6 tega priporočila,
- operation on the basis of the common set of standards , procedures and guidelines referred to in section 6 of this recommendation,
– delovanje na podlagi skupnega niza standardov in smernic, omenjenih v oddelku B tega priporočila,
- operation on the basis of the common set of standards and guidelines referred to in section B of this recommendation,
Priloga, odstavek 2 a (novo)
Annex, point 2 a (new)
V primeru prve zavrnitve registracije je na osnovi doseženega izboljšanja možno novo ocenjevanje.
In the event of an initial refusal of registration, re-assessment is possible on the basis of improvements made.
Pomembno je, da se določi postopek, s katerim je mogoče agencije v primeru zavrnitve registracije znova preveriti, potem ko so dosegle ustrezno izboljšanje.
It is important to set up a procedure whereby, in the event of refusal, agencies can submit themselves for reassessment after they have made the necessary improvements.
PREDLOG KOMISIJE
THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL
Priporočilo je bilo pripravljeno na osnovi priporočila o evropskem sodelovanju pri zagotavljanju kakovosti
The recommendation at issue here builds on the recommendation adopted in 1998 on European cooperation in quality assurance (QA) in higher education
Priporočilo Sveta z dne 24, septembra 1998 o evropskem sodelovanju pri zagotavljanju kakovosti v visokem šolstvu (98/561/ES) UL L 270, 7.10.1998, str.
Council Recommendation of 24 September 1998 on European cooperation in quality assurance in higher education (98/561/EC) OJ.
Obe priporočili si prizadevata za spodbujanje vzajemnega priznavanja sistemov za zagotavljanje in ocenjevanje kakovosti v Evropi.
Both recommendations seek to promote mutual recognition of quality assurance systems and quality assessments in Europe.
Ministri za visokošolsko izobraževanje iz 45 evropskih držav so na zasedanju 19. in 20. maja 2005 v Bergnu razpravljali o napredku Bolonjskega procesa in se dogovorili o pogojih za nadaljnji razvoj področja evropskega visokega šolstva, vključno s sistemi za zagotavljanje kakovosti.
At the meeting in Bergen on 19-20 May 2005, the ministers responsible for higher education from 45 European states discussed the progress of the Bologna process and agreed on the conditions for further development of the European higher education area, including with regard to QA systems.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so številne države že dosegle pomemben napredek pri vzpostavljanju sistemov za zagotavljanje kakovosti in pri spodbujanju sodelovanja.
It was noted that many countries have already made significant progress in establishing QA systems and promoting cooperation.
Kljub temu so potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi; predvsem morajo visokošolske ustanove nadaljevati s prizadevanji za izboljšanje kakovosti s sistematično uvedbo notranjih mehanizmov, ki so neposredno povezani z zunanjim zagotavljanjem kakovosti.
However, further measures are needed: in particular, higher education institutions need to continue their efforts to improve quality by the systematic introduction of internal mechanisms directly linked to external QA.
Notranji mehanizmi zagotavljanja kakovosti
A. Internal quality assurance mechanisms
Cilj je doseči nadaljnji napredek pri razvoju in utrjevanju notranjih mehanizmov zagotavljanja kakovosti v visokošolskih ustanovah po Evropi.
The aim is to achieve further progress in the development and consolidation of internal QA mechanisms at higher education institutions in Europe.
Notranje zagotavljanje kakovosti naj bi hkrati služilo kot podlaga za zunanje ocenjevanje evropskih visokošolskih ustanov, da bi tako dosegli najboljšo možno primerljivost, preglednost in učinkovitost visokošolskih ustanov.
Internal quality management is also intended to serve as the basis for the external assessment of European higher education institutions, in order to optimise their comparability, transparency and performance.
Evropski register agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo
C. A European Register of QA and accreditation agencies
Cilj te točke je vzpostavitev registra zanesljivih agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti.
Here the aim is to set up a register of reliable QA agencies.
Avtonomija univerze pri izbiri agencije
D. University autonomy in choice of agency
Pristojnost držav članic pri upoštevanju ocen in sprejemanju odločitev
E. Member State competence to accept assessments and draw consequences
Komisija nadalje predlaga, da bi morale države članice pri odločanju o licenciranju in financiranju visokošolskih ustanov upoštevati ocene agencij iz Evropskega registra.
The Commission further proposes that the Member States, in making decisions on the licensing and financing of higher education institutions, should accept the decisions of the agencies listed in the European Register.
PRIPOMBE IN PREDLOGI SPREMEMB POROČEVALKE
RAPPORTEUR’S COMMENTS AND AMENDMENTS
Poročevalka podpira predlog Komisije, ki pozitivno prispeva k vzajemnemu priznavanju sistemov za zagotavljanje in ocenjevanje kakovosti v Evropi.
Your rapporteur supports the Commission proposal, which makes a positive contribution to the mutual recognition of quality assurance systems and assessment in Europe.
Zlasti pozdravlja konkretne ukrepe, ki jih Komisija predlaga za izboljšanje učinkovitosti in preglednosti evropskega visokošolskega sistema ter večjo privlačnost sistema za študente in znanstvenike.
In particular, she welcomes the fact that concrete measures have been proposed in order to improve the performance of the European higher education system, to make it more transparent and more attractive for students and academics.
Dobra stran zagotavljanja kakovosti je, da visoka kakovost zahteva večjo mobilnost študentov in delavcev, kar je pomembno v okviru lizbonske strategije.
Another positive element is the fact that high quality in educational establishments requires greater mobility of students and workers, which is important in the context of the Lisbon strategy.
Pozitivno je tudi, da je sistematična uporaba enotnega sistema za zagotavljanje kakovosti kot instrumenta za nenehno izboljševanje kakovosti v visokošolskih ustanovah pomemben predpogoj za doseganje želenega vzajemnega priznavanja kvalifikacij in diplom v Evropi.
Positive, too, is the fact that systematic application of the uniform QA system, as an instrument for continuous quality improvement in higher education institutions, is an important prerequisite for achieving the desired mutual recognition of qualifications and degrees in Europe.
Le s sistematično uporabo mehanizmov za zagotavljanje kakovosti na tak način lahko zagotovimo visoko kakovost visokošolskega izobraževanja v EU, spodbujanje poučevanja v visokošolskih ustanovah in lažjo primerljivost med nacionalnimi izobraževalnimi sistemi.
Only by systematically applying QA mechanisms in this way can we guarantee a high-quality academic education in the EU, promoting teaching in higher education institutions and facilitating comparability between national education systems.
Poročevalka poudarja potrebo po stalni uporabi rezultatov notranjega in zunanjega ocenjevanja programov in ustanov, ki predstavljajo osnovo za naslednji krog ocenjevanja.
Your rapporteur stresses the need for the continuous use of internal and external assessment results from programmes and institutions as the basis for the next cyclical assessment.