natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Varnost tretjih držav je treba ugotoviti za vsakega posameznika posebej.
Safety of third countries should be determined on an individual basis.
Razen tega lahko države članice uporabijo poseben postopek iz odstavka 3, kadar oseba vloži naknadno prošnjo za azil , če začetna prošnja zdaj ni predmet pritožbe :
Moreover, Member States may apply a specific procedure as referred to in paragraph 3, where a person makes a subsequent application for asylum , provided the initial application is not currently open to appeal :
Člen 33A
Article 33A
Države članice lahko ohranijo ali uvedejo postopek iz člena 33, če je prosilec, ki se bodisi namenoma bodisi iz čiste malomarnosti ob določenem času ne zglasi v sprejemnem centru ali pri pristojnih organih, prošnjo za azil vložil kasneje.
Member States may retain or adopt the procedure provided for in Article 33 in the case of an application for asylum filed at a later date by an applicant who, either intentionally or owing to gross negligence, fails to go to a reception centre or to appear before the competent authorities at a specified time .
Člen ni v zvezi z oceno prošnje za azil in je kot tak le kazenski ukrep.
Article is unrelated to the merits of the asylum claim, and is thus no more than a punitive measure.
Člen 35, odstavek 3, alinea 3
Article 35, paragraph 3, indent 3
– omogoči dostop , če je to potrebno, do storitev tolmača, kot je opisano v členu 9(1)(b); in
- have access , if necessary, to the services of an interpreter, as described in Article 9 (1) (b); and
– omogoči dostop do storitev tolmača, kot je opisano v členu 9(1)(b); in
- have access to the services of an interpreter, as described in Article 9 (1) (b); and
Pravica do tolmača in pravica do pravnega svetovalca sta neločljivi pravici v skladu s Konvencijo iz leta 1951.
Right to an interpreter and right to legal advisor are inherent rights, in accordance with 1951 Convention.
Člen 35, odstavek 3, alinea 5
Article 35, paragraph 3, indent 5
– omogoči posvetovanje s pravnim ali drugim svetovalcem , ki ga kot takega priznava nacionalna zakonodaja, kot je opisano v členu 13(1); in
- can consult a legal adviser or counsellor admitted or permitted as such under national law, as described in Article 13 (1); and
– omogoči dostop do pravnega ali drugega svetovalca , ki ga kot takega priznava nacionalna zakonodaja, kot je opisano v členu 13(1); in
- are given access to a legal adviser or counsellor admitted or permitted as such under national law, as described in Article 13 (1); and
V primeru posebnih vrst prihodov ali prihodov, pri katerih gre za veliko število državljanov tretje države ali oseb brez državljanstva, ki vložijo prošnje za azil na meji ali na tranzitnih območjih, zaradi česar je praktično nemogoče izvajati določbe iz odstavka 1 ali poseben postopek, določen v odstavkih 2 in 3, je navedene postopke mogoče izvajati tudi kadar so ti nedržavljani normalno nastanjeni v bližini meje ali tranzitnega območja.
In the event of particular types of arrivals or arrivals involving a large number of third country nationals or stateless persons lodging applications for asylum at the border or in a transit zone, which makes it practically impossible to apply there the provisions of paragraph 1 or the specific procedure set out in paragraphs 2 and 3, those procedures may also be applied where these non-nationals are accommodated normally at locations in proximity to the border or transit zone.
Izraz „nedržavljani“ je v skladu s terminologijo ženevske konvencije.
"Non-nationals" in line with Geneva Convention terminology.
Izvajanje odprtega časovnega okvira za prosilce na meji je v nasprotju z načelom enakega obravnavanja, ki je vključeno v mednarodno pravo, ne glede na okoliščine, ki so jih tja pripeljale.
Implementing an open-end time frame for border applicants defies the principle of equal treatment embedded in international law regardless of the circumstances in which they reached the state.
Take določbe prav tako spodbujajo pobude za nelegalen vstop na ozemlje držav in odvračajo od takojšnje prošnje, zaradi česar se za azil zaprosi šele na meji.
Such provisions also encourage incentives to enter countries illegally and discourage prompt application, rather than claiming asylum at the border.
Države članice, kadar je to primerno, določijo pravila v skladu s svojimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi , ki obravnavajo :
Member States shall, where appropriate, provide for rules in accordance with their international obligations dealing with :
Države članice, kadar je to primerno, določijo pravila v skladu s svojimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi in načelom nevračanja, ki prosilcem zagotavljajo, da lahko ostanejo v državi članici do izida postopka, v zvezi z :
Member States shall, where appropriate, provide for rules in accordance with their international obligations and the principle of non-refoulement ensuring that applicants may remain in the Member State pending the outcome of an appeal, regarding :
Kadar se prosilcu prizna status, ki ponuja enake pravice in ugodnosti v okviru nacionalne zakonodaje in zakonodaje Skupnosti kot status begunca na podlagi Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES, se lahko za prosilca šteje, da ima učinkovito pravno sredstvo, kadar sodišče na podlagi nezadostnega interesa prosilca za nadaljevanje postopkov odloči, da je pravno sredstvo iz odstavka 1 nesprejemljivo ali da bo najverjetneje neuspešno.
Where an applicant has been granted a status, which offers the same rights and benefits under national and Community law as the refugee status by virtue of Council Directive 2004/83/EC , the applicant may be considered to have an effective remedy where a court or tribunal decides that the remedy pursuant to paragraph 1 is inadmissible or unlikely to succeed on the basis of insufficient interest on the part of the applicant in maintaining the proceedings.
Kadar se prosilcu prizna status, ki ponuja enake pravice in ugodnosti v okviru nacionalne zakonodaje in zakonodaje Skupnosti kot status begunca na podlagi Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES, ima prosilec pravico, da se zanj šteje, da ima učinkovito pravno sredstvo, kadar sodišče na podlagi nezadostnega interesa prosilca za nadaljevanje postopkov odloči, da je pravno sredstvo iz odstavka 1 nesprejemljivo ali da bo najverjetneje neuspešno.
Where an applicant has been granted a status, which offers the same rights and benefits under national and Community law as the refugee status by virtue of Council Directive 2004/83/EC, the applicant shall have a right to be considered to have an effective remedy where a court or tribunal decides that the remedy pursuant to paragraph 1 is inadmissible or unlikely to succeed on the basis of insufficient interest on the part of the applicant in maintaining the proceedings.
Na podlagi razlogov iz člena 25(2)(d) imajo begunci pravico, da se jim status begunca prizna v skladu s Konvencijo iz leta 1951 in pravico do učinkovitega sredstva proti zavrnitvi, čeprav jim je odobren status, ki zagotavlja skoraj enake pravice, kot pravice beguncev, v skladu z direktivo o statusu
For reasons outlined in Article 25(2) (d), refugees have a right in having their refugee status recognised under the 1951 Convention and a right to an effective remedy against rejection, even if they have been granted a status which offers nearly identical rights as refugee rights, in accordance with the Qualification Directive.
Spremenjen predlog direktive Sveta o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah
Amended proposal for a Council directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status
členi 51, 41(4) in 55(3)
Rules 51, 41(4) and 55(3)
Datum stališča Parlamenta
Date of Parliament's position
Datum zahteve Sveta za ponovno posvetovanje
Date of Council request for renewed consultation
Datum ponovnega posvetovanja s Parlamentom
Date of renewed consultation of Parliament
o mandatu za usklajevalni postopek za proračun za leto 2006 pred prvo obravnavo Sveta
on the mandate for the 2006 budget conciliation procedure before the Council's first reading
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. aprila 2005 o proračunu za leto 2006: poročilo Komisije o letnem strateškem načrtovanju
– having regard to its resolution of 13 April 2005 on the 2006 budget: the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy report (APS)
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0126 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0126 . ,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga proračuna (PPP) za leto 2006,
– having regard to the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) for 2006,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6-0223/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0223/2005 ),
2. opozarja, da največji znesek, ki se lahko v letu 2006 financira z instrumentom prilagodljivosti, brez upoštevanja možne nadaljnje sprostitve med letom 2005, znaša 320 milijonov EUR;
Recalls that the maximum amount that could be financed through the flexibility instrument in 2006, not counting any possible further mobilisation during 2005, amounts to EUR 320 million;
4. upošteva izjavo Komisije na tristranskem sporazumu z dne 5. aprila 2005, da je, preden se lahko ti zneski vključijo v osnutek proračuna Sveta, potreben sporazum med Svetom in Parlamentom o prenosu sredstev iz podrazdelka 1a v podrazdelek 1b; je pripravljen to omogočiti z uradno spremembo podomejitev skladno s postopki, določenimi v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 6. maja 1999;
Notes the Commission's statement at the trialogue of 5 April 2005 that an agreement between Council and Parliament on the transfer of funds from sub-heading 1a to sub-heading 1b is necessary before such amounts can be included in the Council's Draft Budget; is willing to make this possible through a formal revision of the sub-ceilings according to the procedures set out in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999;
7. meni, da morajo odobritve plačil za strukturne ukrepe temeljiti na dejanskih potrebah in poudarja, da je Komisija izdelala PPP na osnovi najnovejših razpoložljivih napovedi; meni, da bo celotno ovrednotenje izvrševanja odobritev plačil, ki ga mora do konca julija izvesti Komisija, nudilo možnost za ponovno ocenitev potreb za plačila in zagotovilo, da bodo dejanske potrebe v celoti vključene v proračun za leto 2006;
Believes that payment appropriations for the structural actions must be based on real needs and stresses that the Commission based the PDB on the most recent forecasts available; believes that the overall evaluation of the implementation of payment appropriations, to be carried out by the Commission by the end of July, will give an opportunity to re-assess payment needs and ensure that actual needs are fully budgeted for 2006;
10. meni, da PPP Komisije ne zadostuje za uresničevanje dogovorjenih političnih ambicij, zlasti kar zadeva lizbonsko strategijo ter ob upoštevanju pomembnosti krepitve položaja malih in srednje velikih podjetij; poziva Svet, da sodeluje z Evropskim parlamentom v resnem in konstruktivnem dialogu o tem, kako uresničiti te politične zaveze; predlaga, da se v ta okvir vključi uporabo določb točke 33 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999;
Considers the Commission's PDB insufficient as a budgetary reflection of the agreed political ambitions, especially as concerns the Lisbon strategy and taking into account the importance of strengthening the position of the small and medium enterprises invites the Council to engage with the European Parliament in a serious and constructive dialogue on how to meet these political commitments; proposes that in this context the use of the provisions of point 33 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 should be included;
15. po zadnjem predlogu Komisije za revizijo Finančne uredbe poziva Svet, da se pridruži Evropskemu parlamentu pri razpravah o tem, kako olajšati dostop do programov Skupnosti in poenostaviti ustrezne upravne in nadzorne postopke; s tem v zvezi predlaga stalen dialog, ki bi bil namenjen razvoju skupnega pristopa;
Following the latest Commission proposal for a revision of the Financial Regulation, invites the Council to join the European Parliament on the deliberations in how to facilitate access to Community programmes and to simplify the corresponding administrative and control procedures; proposes in this context a regular dialogue in order to develop a common approach;
Mandat za usklajevalni postopek za proračun za leto 2006 pred prvo obravnavo Sveta
The mandate for the 2006 budget conciliation procedure before the Council's first reading
člen 69 ter Priloga IV
Rule 69 and Annex IV
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o obveznih revizijah za letne in konsolidirane računovodske izkaze, ki spreminja Direktivi Sveta 78/660/EGS in 83/349/EGS
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on statutory audit of annual accounts and consolidated accounts and amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC
Wolf Klinz , Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve
Wolf Klinz , Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................66
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (*) ........4
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ..........................89
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 4
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................95
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy .................4
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0177 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0177 )
UL C , str. . ,
OJ C ..., ..., p. .... ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 44(2)(g) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0005/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251 (2) and Article 44(2)(g) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0005/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energijo ( A6‑0224/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0224/2005 ),
(4) Na podlagi dela v tem odboru je Komisija novembra 2000 izdala priporočilo o „zagotavljanju kakovosti obvezne revizije v EU“ in maja 2002 priporočilo o „neodvisnosti zakonitih revizorjev v EU“.
(4) On the basis of the work of this Committee, the Commission issued a Recommendation on ‘Quality Assurance for the Statutory Auditor in the EU’ in November 2000 and a Recommendation on ‘Statutory Auditors’ Independence in the EU’ in May 2002.
Obe priporočili sedaj izvajajo države članice.
Both these Recommendations are being implemented by Member States.
(4a) Cilj te direktive je doseči visoko, čeprav ne popolno, raven uskladitve zahtev na področju obveznih revizij.
(4a) This Directive aims at high level -though not full - harmonisation of statutory audit requirements.
Države članice, ki zahtevajo obvezno revizijo, lahko določijo strožje zahteve, razen če je v besedilu te direktive določeno drugače.
The Member State requiring the statutory audit can impose more stringent requirements, unless otherwise indicated in the text of the Directive.
Tehnično pojasnilo .
Technical clarification.
(8) Zakoniti revizorji se morajo držati najvišjih etičnih standardov.
(8) Statutory auditors should adhere to the highest ethical standards.
Zato morajo delovati v skladu s poklicno etiko.
They should therefore be subject to professional ethics.
To zadeva vsaj njihovo funkcijo zastopanja javnega interesa, poštenost in nepristranskost, strokovno usposobljenost in primerno skrbnost.
This covers at least their public interest function, their integrity and objectivity, and their professional competence and due care.
Funkcija zastopanja javnega interesa zakonitega revizorja pomeni, da se na kakovost njegovega dela zanaša širša skupnost oseb in ustanov.
The public interest function of statutory auditors means that a broader community of people and institutions rely on the quality of a statutory auditor’s work.
Visoka kakovost revizije prispeva k urejenemu delovanju trgov z izboljšanjem neoporečnost in učinkovitosti finančnih poročil.
Good audit quality contributes to an orderly functioning of markets by enhancing the integrity and efficiency of financial statements.
Komisija lahko, kot najmanjše standarde, sprejme izvedbene ukrepe v zvezi s poklicno etiko.
The Commission may, as minimum standards, adopt implementing measures on professional ethics.
Pri tem se lahko obravnavajo načela iz Etičnega kodeksa Mednarodnega združenja računovodij (IFAC).
In doing so, the principles contained in the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) Code of Ethics might be considered.
Pojasnilo pojma poklicne etike.
EN) of Fdr K:\juri\am\567\567945EN.doc)
(9) Zakoniti revizorji in revizijska podjetja morajo spoštovati zasebnost svojih strank.
(9) It is important that statutory auditors and audit firms respect the privacy of their clients.
Zato jih morajo zavezovati stroga pravila o zaupnosti in poklicni tajnosti, ki pa ne smejo ovirati pravilnega izvajanja računovodskih standardov.
They should therefore be bound by strict rules on confidentiality and professional secrecy which, however, should not impede proper enforcement of accounting standards.
Zato jih morajo zavezovati stroga pravila o zaupnosti in poklicni tajnosti, ki pa ne smejo ovirati pravilnega izvajanja določb te Direktive.
They should therefore be bound by strict rules on confidentiality and professional secrecy which, however, should not impede proper enforcement of the provisions of this Directive.
P ravila o zaupnosti morajo veljati tudi za katerega koli zakonitega revizorja ali revizijsko podjetje, ki ne sodeluje več pri posebni revizijski nalogi.
These confidentiality rules should also apply to any statutory auditor or audit firm which has ceased to be involved in a specific audit task.
Spremembe v uvodni izjavi (9) izražajo predlagan predlog spremembe 1 poročila ECON.
The changes in Recital (9) reflect the proposed amendment 1 of the ECON report.
(10) Zakoniti revizorji in revizijska podjetja morajo biti pri opravljanju obvezne revizije neodvisni.
(10) Statutory auditors and audit firms should be independent when carrying out a statutory audit.
Če se znajdejo v položaju, ki bi lahko prizadel njihovo neodvisnost, morajo odstopiti od revizije.
If they find themselves in a situation that might lead to an impairment of their independence, they should resign from the audit engagement.
Prav tako morajo zavrniti opravljanje storitev, ki niso povezane z revizijo in lahko ogrozijo njihovo neodvisnost.
They should also refuse to undertake any non-audit service that might constitute a threat to their independence.
Če se znajdejo v položaju, v katerem je tudi po uporabi ukrepov za ublažitev grožnje preveč ogrožena njihova neodvisnost , morajo odstopiti ali se vzdržati revizije.
If they find themselves in a situation where the significance of the threats to their independence, also after application of safeguards to mitigate those threats, is too high, they should resign or abstain from the audit engagement.
Ugotovitev, da obstaja razmerje, ki ogroža neodvisnost zakonitega revizorja, je lahko drugačna, če gre za razmerje med revizorjem in revidirano družbo ali med omrežjem in revidirano družbo.
The conclusion that there is a relationship which compromises the auditor’s independence may be different for the relationship between the auditor and the audited entity or between the network and the audited entity.
Nepristranska, razumna in obveščena stranka ne bi sklepala, da razmerje na podlagi članstva med člani in neprofitnimi družbami, ki revidirajo člane, ogroža neodvisnost revizijskih družb, dokler člani nimajo vpliva na revizijski postopek.
An objective, reasonable and informed party would not conclude that the membership-based relationship between members and non-profit-making entities auditing their members compromises the auditing entities' independence as long as members have no influence on the auditing process.
Primeri groženj neodvisnosti zakonitega revizorja ali revizorskega podjetja so neposredni ali posredni finančni interesi v revidirani družbi in opravljanje dodatnih storitev, ki niso povezane z revizijo.
Examples of threats to the independence of a statutory auditor or audit firm are a direct or indirect financial interest in the audited entity and the provision of additional non-audit services.
Prav tako lahko višina plačila, ki ga prejme revidirana družba, in/ali struktura plačila predstavljata grožnjo neodvisnosti zakonitega revizorja ali revizijskega podjetja.
Also, the level of fees received from one audited entity and/or the structure of the fees can threaten the independence of a statutory auditor or audit firm.
Vrste varoval, ki se uporabljajo za ublažitev ali odstranitev takšnih groženj, vključujejo prepovedi, omejitve, druge strategije in postopke ter razkritje.
Types of safeguards to be applied to mitigate or eliminate these threats include prohibitions, restrictions, other policies and procedures and disclosure.
Zakoniti revizorji in revizijska podjetja morajo zavrniti opravljanje kakršnih koli dodatnih storitev, ki niso povezane z revizijo in ogrožajo njihovo neodvisnost.
Statutory auditors and audit firms should refuse to undertake any additional non-audit service that compromises their independence.
Komisija lahko kot najmanjše standarde sprejme izvedbene ukrepe v zvezi z neodvisnostjo.
The Commission may, as minimum standards, adopt implementing measures on independence.
Ob tem lahko Komisija upošteva načela iz Priporočila Komisije z dne 16. maja 2002 o „neodvisnosti zakonitih revizorjev v EU“.
In doing so, the Commission might take into consideration the principles contained in the Commission Recommendation of 16 May 2002 on ‘Statutory Auditors’ Independence in the EU'.
Da se ugotovi neodvisnost revizorjev, je treba jasneje opredeliti pojem „omrežje“, v katerem delujejo revizorji.
In order to determine the independence of auditors, the concept of a “network” in which auditors operate needs to be clear.
V zvezi s tem se morajo upoštevati različne okoliščine, kot so primeri, v katerih je struktura lahko opredeljena kot omrežje, ker je namenjena dobičku ali delitvi stroškov, kar se lahko kaže tudi tako, da imajo zakoniti revizorji in/ali revizijska podjetja skupne stalne stranke za revizijo.
In this regard, various circumstances have to be taken into account such as instances where a structure could be defined as a network because it is aimed at profit or cost sharing, which may also be demonstrated if statutory auditors and/or audit firms have common usual audit clients.
Merila za prikaz, da obstaja omrežje, je treba oceniti in pretehtati na podlagi vseh znanih dejanskih okoliščin.
The criteria for demonstrating that there is a network should be judged and weighed on the basis of all factual circumstancesknown to exist.
Ta predlog spremembe poskuša pojasniti pojem neodvisnosti in razjasniti novo opredelitev omrežja v členu 2(5), kot je predlagano v sporazumnem predlogu spremembe člena 2(5).
This amendment aims to clarify the notion of independance and to give more clarity to the new definition of networks in article 2(5) as proposed with compromise amendment to Article 2 (5) .
Prav tako vsebuje pojasnilo o revizijskih enotah, ki temeljijo na članstvu ter ki ne sledijo lastnim finančnim interesom in jih ne ureja načelo maksimiranja dobička.
It also contains clarification on Membership based auditing entities which do not pursue any financial interests of their own and are not governed by the principle of maximizing profits.
Cilj oblikovanja takšne organizacije je, da se le za člane zagotovijo stroškovno učinkovite revizijske storitve visokokakovostnih standardov.
The aim of forming such an organisation is to provide only members with cost efficient audit services of high quality standards.