natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ti ukrepi morajo presegati odnos med ladjo in pristaniščem ter zajemati celotno pristaniško območje, s čimer bi varnostni ukrepi iz Uredbe (ES) št. …/…. razširili tudi na sosednja območja .
They should extend beyond the ship/port interface and cover the entire port thus both protecting the port areas and ensuring that security measures taken in application of Regulation (EC) Nr. …/…. benefit from enhanced security in adjacent areas .
Ti ukrepi se nanašajo na pristanišča z eno ali več pristaniškimi napravami, ki jih pokriva Uredba (ES) št. …/…. .…/…. .
These measures should apply to all those ports in which one or more port facilities are situated which are covered by Regulation (EC) Nr. …/…. .
Ti ukrepi morajo presegati odnos med ladjo in pristaniščem ter zajemati celotno pristaniško območje, s čimer bi varnostni ukrepi iz Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004 o povečanju zaščite na ladjah * pomenili povečano varnost na območjih pristaniške dejavnosti.
They should extend beyond the ship/port interface and cover the entire port thus both protecting the port areas and ensuring that security measures taken in application of Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 on enhancing ship and port facility security * benefit from enhanced security in areas of port activity .
Ti ukrepi se nanašajo na pristanišča z eno ali več pristaniškimi napravami, ki jih pokriva Uredba (ES) št. 725/2004 .
These measures should apply to all those ports in which one or more port facilities are situated which are covered by Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 .
* UL L 129, 29.4.2004, str.
* OJ L 129, 29.4.2004, p.
V nekaterih primerih bi morala zaradi visoko tveganih dejavnosti in obratov, recimo petrokemičnih, ki se nahajajo na območjih pod upravo pristanišč, direktiva veljati tudi zanja.
It is important to prevent ambiguities in terminology from resulting in a situation where the directive is not applicable outside the confines of ports where there are high-risk activities and plants (for example petrochemical plants).
Uvodna izjava 12 a (novo)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12 a) Financiranje posebnih varnostnih ukrepov ne bi smelo povzročati izkrivljanja konkurence.
(12a) The funding of extra security measures should not generate distortions of competition.
Finančna študija, napovedana v Uvodni izjavi 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004, vključuje tudi stroške ukrepov, sprejetih v skladu s to direktivo in oblikuje smernice za delitev stroškov med organi oblasti, pristaniškimi organi in izvajalci.
The financial study announced in recital 15 of Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 should also cover the costs involved in measures taken under this directive and establish guidelines for cost-sharing between the public authorities, port authorities and operators.
Komisija najkasneje do 15. decembra 2005 posreduje izsledke Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
By 31 December 2005 at the latest, the Commission should submit the findings of this study to the European Parliament and the Council.
Podpira predlog poročevalca za izvedbo študije o delitvi stroškov, nastalih z izvajanjem te direktive.
Supports the rapporteur's proposal for a study on sharing the costs involved in this directive.
Vendar se stroški že praviloma ne bi smeli deliti med organe oblasti in izvajalce, saj so pristaniški organi prav tako pomembna vpletena stran in v vseh pristaniščih niso isti kot organi oblasti.
However, the costs need not by definition be shared between the authorities and operators as port authorities are also important parties, and are not synonymous with the public authorities in all ports.
Člen 1, odstavek 1, pododstavek 2
Article 1, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2
Prav tako mora zagotoviti, da so varnostni ukrepi, sprejeti ob uporabi Uredbe (ES) št. …/…, pri povečani varnosti v sosednjih območjih pristanišč še učinkovitejši .
It shall also ensure that security measures taken in application of Regulation (EC) Nr. …/…. benefit from enhanced security in adjacent port areas .
Prav tako mora zagotoviti, da so varnostni ukrepi, sprejeti ob uporabi Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004 pri povečani varnosti v pristaniščih še učinkovitejši
It shall also ensure that security measures taken in application of Regulation (EC) No725/2004 benefit from enhanced port security .
Države članice v skladu s členom 2 Direktive same določijo meje posameznega pristanišča za namene te direktive.
Under Article 2 of the directive is up to the Member States themselves to identify for each port the boundaries for the purposes of this directive.
Država članica mora tako v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti sama določiti, ali velja ta direktiva tudi za področja zunaj pristanišč ali ne.
In accordance with the subsidiarity principle, it should therefore be up to the Member States to determine whether or not the directive should also apply to areas outside ports.
Ta direktiva se nanaša na varnostne ukrepe, ki veljajo za osebe, infrastrukturo in opremo ter prevozna sredstva v pristaniščih, kot tudi na sosednjih območjih, kadar ti neposredno ali posredno vplivajo na varnost v pristanišču.
This directive addresses security measures which need to be observed by or affect people, infrastructure and equipment, including means of transport, in ports as well as in adjacent areas where these have a direct or indirect impact on security in the port .
Ta direktiva se nanaša na varnostne ukrepe, ki veljajo za osebe, infrastrukturo in opremo ter prevozna sredstva v pristaniščih.
This directive addresses security measures which need to be observed by or affect people, infrastructure and equipment, including means of transport, in ports.
Države članice lahko uporabijo določila te direktive v območjih, povezanih s pristaniščem .
Member States may apply the provisions of this Directive to port-related areas.
Odbor za varnost v pristanišču
Port security committee
Države članice ustanovijo odbore za varnost v pristanišču, ki v pristaniščih, za katere velja ta direktiva, posredujejo praktične nasvete, razen kadar so takšni odbori zaradi posebnega značaja pristanišča nepotrebni.
Member States shall ensure that port security committees are established to provide practical advice in the ports covered by this directive, unless the specificity of a port renders such committees superfluous.
Sestava odbora za varnost v pristanišču se razlikuje med posameznimi pristanišči, vendar mora vedno odražati operativne funkcije in funkcije javnih organov v pristanišču.
The membership of the port security committee may vary between ports, but should always reflect the operational and public authority functions in a port.
Odbor deluje po načelu ‘potrebe po seznanitvi’.
It shall function on a ‘need to know basis’.
Člen 14, odstavek 3, pododstavek 2
Article 14, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2
Država članica dovoli takšne preglede ter zagotovi, da jih dovolijo tudi ustrezni organi ali osebe.
The Member State concerned shall submit to such inspections and shall ensure that bodies or persons concerned also submit to those inspections.
Komisija in odgovorni organi v državah članicah morajo zagotoviti, da inšpekcije povzročijo čim manj motenj v pristaniščih.
The Commission and the bodies concerned in the Member States shall coordinate the various inspections so as to keep disruption to ports and the administrative burden on inspection bodies to a minimum.
Člen 19 a (novo)
Article 19 a (new)
Člen 19a
Article 19a
Poročilo o oceni
Evaluation report
Najpozneje tri leta po začetku veljave te direktive ter vsakih pet let, mora Komisija predložiti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o oceni, ki med drugim temelji na podatki, pridobljenih v skladu s členom 14.
No later than [three years after the entry into force of the directive] and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall submit an evaluation report to the European Parliament and the Council based, among other things, on the information obtained pursuant to Article 14.
V poročilu mora Komisija analizirati upoštevanje direktive s strani držav članic ter učinkovitost sprejetih meril.
In the report, the Commission shall analyse compliance with the directive by the Member States and the effectiveness of the measures taken.
Če je treba, mora predstaviti predlog za dodatna merila.
If necessary, it shall present proposals for additional measures.
Redne ocene izvajanja direktive so potrebne za prilagajanje stopnje varnosti v pristaniščih ter izpostavljenosti tveganjem.
Periodic evaluations of implementation of the directive are necessary in order to keep up to date with any new threats to port security.
Pristanišča so ključna povezava v prevozni verigi, saj povezujejo morsko in kopensko trgovino ter potniške tokove.
Ports are an essential link within the transport chain, linking up maritime with landside trade and passenger flows.
Pristanišča pogosto predstavljajo kontaktno točko za pretovarjanje nevarnega tovora, namenjenega v večja kemijska in petrokemijska proizvodna središča, poleg tega pa so pogosto v bližini mest.
Ports are often the focal point for trans-shipments of dangerous cargo, for major chemical and petrochemical production centres, and are often situated near cities.
Teroristični napadi lahko povzročijo resne motnje v prevoznih sistemih in sprožijo velike naknadne vplive, poleg tega pa lahko poškodujejo ljudi v pristaniščih in bližnje prebivalstvo.
Terrorist attacks in ports can result in serious disruptions to transport systems and trigger knock-on effects, as well as harming people in the port and the neighbouring population.
Po napadih v Washingtonu, v New Yorku in v Madridu spomladi leta 2004 so evropske ustanove dosegle dogovor glede uredbe o povečanju varnosti ladij in objektov v pristaniščih.
Following the attacks in Washington, New York and Madrid, in spring 2004 the European institutions reached agreement on a regulation on enhancing ship and port facility security
(Uredba št. 75/2004 – poročilo Miguéleza Ramosa).
(Regulation 75/2004 - Miguélez Ramos report).
S to uredbo so bili na evropsko zakonodajo preneseni nedavni dogovori Mednarodne pomorske organizacije, vključno s spremembami Konvencije o varnosti človeškega življenja na morju (SOLAS) in Mednarodnega kodeksa o zaščiti ladij in pristanišč (kodeks ISPS).
This regulation transposed recent IMO agreements into European legislation, including amendments to the Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and the Code on international ship and port facility security (ISPS-code).
V skladu z Uredbo morajo ladje oblastem posredovati varnostne podatke, še preden ladje priplujejo v pristanišče; poleg tega morajo pristanišča uvesti varnostne preglede, države članice pa morajo imenovati poseben organ za pomorsko varnost.
The regulation requires vessels to provide security information to the authorities before they put in to port; it also requires ports to introduce safety checks and Member States to appoint a special body for maritime security.
Parlament ni bil edini, ki je – ko se je razpravljalo o Uredbi – poudarjal, da varnostni ukrepi ne bi smeli biti omejeni na terminale v pristaniščih, ampak da bi morali biti razširjeni na celotno pristanišče, navsezadnje pa tudi na celotno intermodalno verigo.
When that regulation was discussed, Parliament was not alone in saying that security measures should not be restricted to port terminals but should also extend to the whole port and ultimately the entire intermodal chain.
Ta predlog direktive izpolnjuje to zahtevo.
The present proposal for a directive meets that request.
Povzetek predloga
Summary of the proposal
Delovna skupina Mednarodne pomorske organizacije in Mednarodne organizacije dela je spomladi leta 2004 sestavila Kodeks prakse o varnosti v pristaniščih.
An IMO-ILO Working Group drew up a Code of Practice on Port Security in spring 2004.
Kodeks je začel veljati julija 2004, vendar pa je to samo kodeks ravnanja in ni pravno zavezujoč.
The code entered into force in July 2004 but as it is only a code of conduct it is not legally binding.
V tem predlogu je Komisija kodeks poskušala čim bolj upoštevati.
In this proposal the Commission has tried to keep as closely as possible to the code.
Cilj direktive je povečanje varnosti v pristaniščih in v sosednjih območjih, ki jih Uredba št. 75/2004 ne pokriva.
The directive aims to increase security in ports and in adjacent areas not covered by Regulation 75/2004.
Direktiva določa akterje in postopke, ki so ključni za povečanje varnosti.
The directive defines the actors and procedures that are crucial to enhancing security.
Države članice poziva, da določijo organ za varnost v pristaniščih in da za vsako pristanišče imenujejo uslužbenca za varnost v pristaniščih .
It calls on Member States to designate a port security authority and appoint a port security officer for each individual port.
Obstaja tudi zahteva po oblikovanju svetovalnega odbora za varnost v pristanišču.
There is also a requirement to set up an advisory port security committee.
Nazadnje morajo države članice imenovati kontaktne točke, s katerimi obvestijo Komisijo o podrobnostih stika med organi za varnost v pristaniščih in uslužbenci za varnost v pristaniščih.
Finally the Member States are to appoint focal points to notify the Commission of the contact details of the port security authorities and port security officers
Direktiva zahteva tudi, da države članice organizirajo ocenjevanje varnosti v pristaniščih kot podlago za oblikovanje načrtov za varnost v pristaniščih .
The directive also requires Member States to arrange for port security assessments as a basis for establishing port security plans .
Te ocene in načrti morajo biti proučeni v rednih časovnih presledkih.
These assessments and plans are to be reviewed at regular intervals.
Poleg tega morajo države članice uvesti sistem s tremi varnostnimi ravnmi.
In addition, Member States are to introduce a system with three security levels.
Komisija mora z nizom inšpekcij spremljati, kako države članice izvajajo Direktivo.
The Commission is to monitor Member States' implementation of the directive through a series of inspections.
Direktiva vsebuje na koncu določbe o zaupnosti in širjenju podatkov.
Finally, the directive contains provisions on confidentiality and the dissemination of information.
Splošni pristop Sveta
Council's general approach
10. junija 2004, pred prvim branjem v Parlamentu, se je Svet za promet dogovoril o splošnem pristopu k direktivi.
On 10 June 2004, pending Parliament's first reading, the Transport Council agreed on a general approach to the directive.
Pristop Sveta na splošno potrjuje predlog Komisije, poleg priprave sprememb pa vsebuje tudi naslednje spremembe:
The Council's approach broadly endorses the Commission proposal but contains, along with drafting changes, the following substantive amendments:
· Svet je področje Direktive načeloma omejil na pristanišča, poleg tega pa iz nje izključuje vojaške objekte in naprave v pristaniščih, saj želi Komisija vključiti „sosednja območja“ v okvir Direktive.
· the Council has restricted the scope of the directive in principle to ports and excludes military installations in ports, whereas the Commission also wants to include 'adjacent areas' within the scope of the directive.
· Svet je izbrisal člen 10, ki določa ustanovitev odborov za varnost v pristaniščih.
· The Council has deleted Article 10 which provides for setting up of advisory port security committees.
· Svet je omejil naloge kontaktih točk za varnost v pristaniščih.
· The Council has restricted the tasks of the focal points for port security.
· Svet je izbrisal določbo o tem, da mora Komisija opraviti inšpekcije, s katerimi spremlja, kako države članice izvajajo Direktivo.
· The Council has deleted the provision that the Commission should carry out inspections to monitor implementation of the directive by Member States.
Stališče poročevalca
Rapporteur's position
Vaš poročevalec pozdravlja predlog direktive kot uporabni ukrep za povečanje varnosti v pristaniščih.
Your rapporteur welcomes the proposal for a directive as a useful measure to enhance port security.
S sprejemom odločitve o usklajenem evropskem pristopu se bomo izognili izkrivljanju konkurence med evropskimi pristanišči.
Opting for a harmonised European approach will also avoid distortions of competition between European ports.
Komisiji je treba tudi čestitati, da je v besedilu v čim večji meri upoštevala terminologijo in definicije, uporabljene v dokumentih Mednarodne pomorske organizacije, omenjenih zgoraj (SOLAS, kodeks ISPS, Kodeks prakse o varnosti v pristaniščih), ter terminologijo in definicije, uporabljene v Uredbi št. 75/2004.
The Commission is also to be congratulated on keeping as closely as possible in the text of the directive to the terminology and definitions used in the IMO documents referred to above (SOLAS, ISPS-code, Code of Practice on Port Security) and those used in Regulation 75/2004.
To izboljšuje preglednost in pravno varnost ter zmanjšuje administrativno breme vpletenih organizacij in oblasti.
This enhances transparency and legal certainty and reduces the administrative burden on the organisations and authorities involved.
Kljub temu je to, da je Komisija sprejela direktivo, namesto da bi razširila področje obstoječe uredbe terminalov na vsa področja pristanišč, vredno obžalovanja.
However, it is regrettable that the Commission has opted for a directive instead of extending the scope of the existing terminal regulation to all port areas.
To povzroča nasprotujoče si in občasno prekrivajoče se zakonodajne ukrepe, ki obstajajo drug poleg drugega, kar ne vodi k preglednosti.
This results in divergent and at times overlapping legislative measures existing alongside each other, which is not conducive to transparency.
Če pride do preklica uredb, ni ta pristop v nobeno pomoč.
And when it comes to rolling back regulation, this approach is of no help at all.
Naslednje spremembe poskušajo izboljšati določene vidike predloga direktive.
The following amendments seek to improve specific aspects of the proposal for a directive.
Področje uporabe Direktive
Scope of application of the directive
Podobno kot Svet tudi vaš poročevalec ne more sprejeti tega, da bi moralo področje Direktive veljati tudi za sosednja območja pristanišč.
Like the Council, your rapporteur cannot accept that the scope of the directive should also apply to adjacent port areas.
O tem, kaj predstavljajo „sosednja območja pristanišč“, ne obstaja nobena jasna opredelitev.
There is no clear definition of what constitute relevant 'adjacent port areas'.
Poleg tega so ta območja pogosto zunaj pristojnosti pristaniških oblasti.
Furthermore, such areas frequently do not come under the jurisdiction of the port authority.
Odločitev o tem, kaj predstavlja področje pristanišča, in odločitev o tem, ali bi razširili Direktivo na sosednja območja ali ne, bi tako morala biti prepuščena državam članicam.
The definition of what constitutes a port area and the decision whether or not to extend the directive to adjacent areas should therefore be left to the discretion of Member States.
Študija o financiranju varnosti v pristaniščih
Study on the funding of port security
Prejšnja Uredba št. 725/2004 zahteva, da opravi Komisija študijo o delitvi stroškov med oblastmi in izvajalci.
The earlier Regulation 725/2004 requires the Commission to carry out a study into cost-sharing between the authorities and operators.
Prav tako je potrebna podobna študija za ta predlog.
A similar study is also required for the present proposal.
Na tej stopnji ni jasno, kakšne stroške bi povzročili predvideni ukrepi in kdo jih bo pokril.
At this stage it is not clear what costs the proposed measures would entail and who should cover them.
To ne koristi enakim konkurenčnim pogojem.
This is not in the interests of a level playing field.
Odločitev o prejemanju nasvetov o raznih vidikih varnosti v pristaniščih bi morala biti prepuščena pristaniščem in državam članicam.
It should be left up to the ports and Member States to decide how they choose to obtain advice on the various aspects of port security.
Določba, ki zahteva ustanovitev svetovalnih odborov za varnost v pristaniščih, se tako lahko izbriše.
The provision requiring the setting up of a port security advisory committee can therefore be deleted.
Inšpekcije Komisije
Commission inspections
Uspeh ali neuspeh te direktive je odvisen od učinkovitega izvajanja in izvrševanja.
The success of this directive stands or falls by its effective implementation and enforcement.
V tem kontekstu in v korist enakih konkurenčnih pogojev mora biti Komisija sposobna opraviti te inšpekcije.
In this context, and in the interests of a level playing field, the Commission must be able to carry out inspections.
Uredba št. 75/2004 o povečanju varnosti ladij in objektov v pristaniščih vsebuje tudi ustrezne določbe.
Regulation 75/2004 on enhancing ship and port facility security also contains provisions to this effect.
Kljub temu pa mora Komisija zagotoviti, da inšpekcije ne povzročijo nepotrebne dodatne birokracije in da ne povzročijo motenj v pristaniščih, ki bi bile posledica prevelikega števila neusklajenih inšpekcij.
However, the Commission must ensure that its inspections do not create unnecessary additional bureaucracy or cause disruption to ports as a result of an excessive number of uncoordinated inspections.
Podatki za Parlament in Svet
Information for Parliament and Council
Ustrezno izvajanje in izvrševanje te direktive je, kot je bilo navedeno zgoraj, ključnega pomena za zagotavljanje varnosti v pristaniščih in za zagotavljanje enakih konkurenčnih pogojev.
As stated earlier, proper implementation and enforcement of this directive are crucial to ensure both port security and a level playing field.
Komisija mora zato v rednih časovnih presledkih poročati Parlamentu in Svetu ter oceniti, ali so spremembe direktive potrebne zaradi spremenjenih terorističnih groženj ali zaradi drugih razlogov.
The Commission is therefore asked to report to Parliament and the Council at regular intervals and to assess whether adjustments to the directive are required because of changes in the terrorist threat or for other reasons.
Komisija omenja v izjavi o finančnem poročilu o predlogu direktive naknadno ocenjevanje.
In the financial impact statement for the proposal for a directive the Commission mentions a follow-up evaluation.
To ocenjevanje bo skupaj s podatki, pridobljenimi z inšpekcijami, predstavljalo osnovo poročila za Parlament in Svet.
This evaluation, together with the information gained from inspections, will provide a basis for a report to Parliament and the Council.
MNENJE ODBORA ZA INDUSTRIJO, RAZISKAVE IN ENERGETIKO
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY
za Odbor za promet in turizem
for the Committee on Transport and Tourism
Pripravljavec mnenja: Giles Bryan Chichester
Draftsman: Giles Bryan Chichester
Evropska komisija je dne 28. maja 2004 sprejela spremenjeni predlog za direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o večji pristaniški varnosti.
The European Commission adopted its amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on enhancing port security on 28 May 2004.
Ta predlog mora biti obravnavan po postopku soodločanja, odbor ITRE pa je bil pozvan, naj poda svoje mnenje Odboru za promet in turizem.
This proposal has to be treated under the codecision procedure and the ITRE Committee has been called to deliver an opinion for the Committee on Transport and Tourism.
Ta predlog direktive je namenjen povečanju varnosti v tistih delih pristanišč, ki jih Uredba (ES) št. 725/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o večji varnosti na ladjah in pristaniških napravah z dne 31. marca 2004 ne omenja.
This proposal for a Directive intends to enhance security in those areas of ports not covered by Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on enhancing ship and port facility security.
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da lahko ta predlog izpolni zastavljene cilje, vseeno pa opozarja, da nekatere teme niso bile primerno obravnavane, in sicer:
Your Draftsman believes that such a proposal is adequate in order to fulfil its objectives, but nevertheless points out that there are some issues that are not addressed satisfactorily, namely: