natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– primerjalna študija o preferencialni obravnavi, ki jo ponujata sistem SSP in Sporazum AKP – EU iz Cotonouja z državami AKP, zato da spremembe, vključene v pregledano uredbo, tem državam zagotovijo vsaj enakovredne preferenciale, kot zanje veljajo v okviru Cotonoujskega sporazuma;
- a comparative study of the preferential treatment offered by the GSP and the ACP-EU Cotonou Agreement to ACP countries, with a view to providing them, in a revised regulation, with at least an equivalent preferential treatment to the one they were granted under the Cotonou Agreement;
- analizo potencialnih učinkov razširitve sistema preferencialov s povečevanjem preferencialnih marž, odobrenih za občutljive proizvode in/ali s prenosom „občutljivih“ proizvodov v kategorijo „neobčutljivih“;
- an analysis of the potential effects of extending the system of preferences by increasing the preferential margin accorded for sensitive products and/or transferring 'sensitive' products to the 'non-sensitive' category;
- oceno prispevka uredbe k doseganju razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja (RCNT), zlasti v primeru najmanj razvitih držav.
- an evaluation of the contribution of this regulation to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), in particular in relation to LDCs.
Komisija predloži posebno poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu ob zaključku kroga pogajanj v Dohi o vplivu pogajanj o sistemu preferencialov, določenih v tej uredbi, in o ukrepih, ki bodo sprejeti za zagotovitev učinkovitosti splošnega sistema preferencialov.
The Commission shall submit a special report to the European Parliament at the conclusion of the Doha Round, examining the impact of the negotiations on the scheme established in this Regulation and considering the measures to be adopted to ensure the effectiveness of the generalised system of preferences.
Treba je vzpostaviti urejen sistem za spremljanje in ocenjevanje uredbe in obveščanje Evropskega parlamenta; predvideti v uredbi določbo za vpliv, ki ga bodo imela pogajanja STO na manj razvite države; in upoštevati obsežno oceno sistema, skupaj z mnenji držav upravičenk, preden se ukrepa v smeri spremembe trenutne uredbe.
It is necessary to establish a regular system for monitoring and assessing the regulation and keeping the European Parliament informed; to make provision in the regulation for the impact that WTO negotiations will have on the LDCs; and to take account of a wide-ranging assessment of the system, together with the opinion of the beneficiary countries, before taking steps to revise the present regulation.
V času, ko je trend na globalni ravni naklonjen splošni eroziji preferencialov, je treba upoštevati možnost, da se poveča obseg in velikodušnost sheme.
In a context marked by the erosion of preferences, particular attention should be paid to the possible improvement of the scope and generosity of the scheme.
Člen 26, odstavek 3
Article 26, paragraph 3
Odbor pregleda vplive na načrt Skupnosti za splošne tarifne preferenciale, na podlagi poročila Komisije za obdobje od 1. aprila 2005 do 31. decembra 2008.
The Committee shall examine the effects of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, on the basis of a report from the Commission covering the period 1 April 2005 to 31 December 2008.
To poročilo zajema vse preferencialne dogovore iz člena 1(2).
This report shall cover all preferential arrangements referred to in Article 1(2).
Odbor pregleda vplive na nacrt Skupnosti za splošne tarifne preferenciale, na podlagi študije o presoji vplivov iz člena 25a.
The Committee shall examine the effects of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, on the basis of the impact-assessment study referred to in Article 25a.
Da bi leta 2008 ustrezno pregledali Uredb,o je treba izvesti dobro študijo o presoji vplivov na delovanje sistema med letoma 2005 in 2007.
In order to adequately review the Regulation in 2008, a good impact-assessment study on the functioning of the system during the period 2005 to 2007 is necessary.
Člen 30, odstavek 1
Article 30, paragraph 1
Ta uredba začne veljati 1. aprila 2005.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2005.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 se razveljavi s 1. aprilom 2005.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 is repealed with effect from 1 April 2005.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 se razveljavi s 1. aprilom 2005 brez vpliva na odstavek 1 a.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 is repealed with effect from 1 April 2005 without prejudice to paragraph 1a .
Člen 30, odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 30, paragraph 1 a (new)
Oddelka 2 in 4 naslova II, oddelka 1 in 2 naslova III ter naslov IV Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 ostanejo v uporabi do objave seznama držav upravičenk, ki so upravičene uživanja posebnega spodbujevalnega režima, predvidenega v oddelku 2 te uredbe, v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Sections 2 and 4 of Title II, Sections 1 and 2 of Title III, and Title IV of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 shall remain applicable until the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the list of the beneficiary countries entitled to benefit from the special incentive arrangement provided for in Section 2 of this Regulation.
Posebni spodbujevalni režimi, predvideni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 ostanejo v uporabi do 31. decembra 2005 za države upravičenke, ki niso vključene v seznam držav upravičenk za poseben spodbujevalni režim, predviden v oddelku 2 te uredbe.
The special incentive arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 shall remain applicable until 31 December 2005 to the beneficiary countries that are not included in the list of beneficiary countries for the special incentive arrangement provided for in Section 2 of this Regulation.
Ta določba je možna vrzel za države upravičenke v vmesnem obdobju med razveljavitvijo prejšnjih posebnih spodbujevalnih režimov in začetkom veljavnosti novih.
This provision presents the possibility of a loophole for beneficiary countries in the interim period between the repeal of the previous special incentive arrangements and the entry into force of the new one.
To lahko tudi spodbudi zgodnjo uporabo nove Uredbe v skladu s predlogom spremembe 2, da se zagotovi načelo upravičenega zaupanja in smotrnega upravljanja ter prepreči nezaželeno škodo držav upravičenk in gospodarskih subjektov.
This could also facilitate an early application of the new Regulation in accordance with Amendment 2 in order to guarantee the principle of legitimate trust and sound administration, and in order to prevent undesirable and unwanted damage to beneficiary countries and economic operators.
Člen 30, odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 30, paragraph 2 a (new)
Predlog pregledane uredbe, ki zajema obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 predloži Komisija Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu ter Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru do 1. junija 2007.
The proposal for a revised regulation covering the period 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 shall be transmitted by the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee by 1 June 2007.
Novi predlogi ustrezno upoštevajo rezultate študije o presoji vplivov iz člena 25a(2 ).
The new proposal shall duly take into consideration the results of the impact-assessment study referred to in Article 25a(2).
Da se zagotovi skladnost z zahtevami enoletnega obdobja predvidljivosti, ki ga zahtevajo države upravičenke in gospodarski subjekti, je treba pregledano Uredbo potrditi do 1. januarja 2008.
In order to comply with the requirement of one-year predictability requested by beneficiary countries and economic operators, the revised Regulation should be approved by 1 January 2008.
Da se omogoči pomembno posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom in ustreznimi interesnimi skupinami, je treba predlog izdati najmanj šest mesecev prej (1. junij 2007).
In order to allow for a meaningful consultation with the European Parliament and relevant stakeholders, the proposal should be issued at least six months in advance (1 June 2007).
Takšno časovno načrtovanje Komisiji omogoči, da vključi sklepe študije o presoji vpliva, ki se objavi do 1. marca 2007.
This timing enables the Commission to incorporate the findings of the impact-assessment study, which shall be published by 1 March 2007.
Idealno bi moralo biti takšno časovno načrtovanje poročanja in revizij že vključeno v prihodnje Uredbe.
Ideally this timing of reporting and revision should be incorporated in future Regulations.
MNENJE ODBORA ZA RAZVOJ
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT
za Odbor za mednarodno trgovino
for the Committee on International Trade
Pripravljavec mnenja: Margrietus van den Berg
Draftsman(*): Margrietus van den Berg
Komisija je 20. oktobra 2004 izdala predlagano uredbo o shemi splošnih tarifnih preferencialov, ki naj bi glede na predlagano besedilo Komisije urejala GSP od 1. julija 2005 do 31. decembra 2008.
The proposed regulation for a new scheme of generalised tariff preferences was issued by the Commission on 20 October 2004, and, according to the text proposed by the Commission, should regulate the GSP from 1 July 2005 to 31 December 2008.
Predlog sledi sporočilu z dne 7. julija 2004, ki opredeljuje smernice novega sistema GSP za obdobje desetih let od 2006 do 2015.
The proposal follows a Communication dated 7 July 2004 setting out the guidelines of the new GSP system for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015.
Potem, ko sta odbora DEVE in INTA Komisiji in Svetu predstavila vprašanja za ustni odgovor, se je o sporočilu na široko razpravljalo na plenarnem zasedanju 14. oktobra, sporočilo pa je spodbudilo tudi soglasno sprejeto resolucijo.
Following the presentation of oral questions to the Commission and the Council by the DEVE and INTA Committees, this Communication was widely debated in Plenary on 14 October, and was the subject of a resolution adopted practically unanimously.
GSP je od vzpostavitve 1971. leta bil ključni instrument razvojne politike EU.
Since its creation in 1971, the GSP has been a key instrument of the EU's Development Policy.
Dejansko EU vsako leto "podari" 2,2 milijardi ameriških dolarjev v obliki trgovinskih preferencialov, kar je pravzaprav več kot uradna razvojna pomoč.
Indeed, every year the EU "donates" 2.2 billion USD dollars in the form of trade preferences, which is actually superior to the level of official development aid.
Odbor za razvoj in na splošno Evropski parlament je prispeval k temu, da se v tolikšni meri ohranja razvojna usmerjenost sistema GSP.
It is the responsibility of the Development Committee in particular and of the European Parliament in general to maintain this strong development focus of the GSP system.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu 7. julija že prej omenila predlagane reforme v osnutku uredbe, na katere se je 14. oktobra z resolucijo, ki je bila sprejeta z veliko večino, odzval Parlament.
The reforms proposed in the draft regulation were previously outlined by the Commission in its Communication of 7 July, to which the Parliament reacted on 14 October with a resolution adopted by a large majority.
Kot je v svoji resoluciji izjavil Evropski parlament, pripravljavec mnenja močno podpira cilje, ki jih določa sporočilo in nadalje razvija osnutek uredbe, kot so poenostavitev, stabilizacija in jasnejše določbe, usmerjenost preferencialov na tiste države v razvoju, ki jih najbolj potrebujejo, in dodatni poudarek na trajnostnem razvoju.
As the EP stated in that resolution, the draftsman strongly supports the objectives set out in the Communication and further developed in the draft regulation, such us the simplification, stabilisation and clarification of the arrangements, the concentration of preferences on those developing countries most in need, and the enhancement of the sustainable development component.
Med sporočilom in osnutkom uredbe, ki ju je pripravila Komisija, obstajajo razlike, in Parlament je prosil za pojasnitev ali nadaljnje informacije v zvezi z njimi.
There are, however, some discrepancies between the Communication and the draft regulation issued by the Commission, about which the Parliament should ask for clarification or further information.
Prva razlika med sporočilom in zakonodajnim besedilom, ki jo je pripravljavec mnenja opazil, je predlagani časovni načrt uporabe uredbe.
The first discrepancy between the Communication and the legislative text, observed by the draftsman, is the proposed timing of application of the regulation.
Od začetka postopka revizije in do 20. oktobra (na ta dan se je izdal ta predlog uredbe) je Komisija vztrajala, da je datum uveljavitve nove uredbe 1. januar 2006.
Since the beginning of the revision process, and until the 20 of October (the very day this draft regulation was published), the Commission maintained that the date for the new regulation's entry into force would be 1 January 2006.
Ta datum je komisar Pascal Lamy potrdil v svojem nastopu na plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta 14. oktobra.
This date was confirmed by Commissioner Pascal Lamy in his speech at the European Parliament plenary session on 14 October.
Mnogi poslanci so v razpravi s Pascalom Lamyjem omenjali, da bo zaradi tega datuma za posvetovanje z EP in zainteresiranimi na voljo malo časa.
As mentioned by many parliamentarians during the debate with Pascal Lamy, this date already implied a tight timetable for consultation with the EP and stakeholders.
Lamy se je strinjal, da se to obdobje lahko skrajša na devet mesecev in se tako Evropskemu parlamentu omogoči dovolj časa za konkretno posvetovanje.
Commissioner Lamy agreed that this period could be shortened to nine months, to provide enough time for a meaningful consultation with the EP.
Svet je v svojih zaključkih, sprejetih 12. oktobra, potrdil potrebo po konkretnem posvetovanju z EP in ostalimi zainteresiranimi v zvezi z reformo GSP, kot tudi potrebo, da se gospodarskim subjektom omogoči primeren čas za prilagoditev novim pravilom.
The Council recognised, in its conclusions adopted on 12 October, the need for a meaningful consultation with the EP and other stakeholders on the GSP reform, as well as the need to give economic operators adequate time to adapt to the new rules.
Sedaj, ko je Komisija izdala svoj predlog, lahko opazimo, da je predlagani datum uveljavitve 1. julij 2005.
Now that the Commission draft has been published, we see that the proposed date for entry into force is 1 July 2005.
Komisija pojasnjuje, da je sprememba povezana z dejstvom, da je Indija sklicala posebno skupino STO, ki naj preuči njeno zahtevo po odklonitvi pravil GSP o zdravilih.
The Commission explains that this change was related to a WTO panel brought by India to challenge the GSP drugs regime.
Predpisi nalagajo Evropski uniji, da spremembe izvede do 1. julija 2005, Komisija pa predlaga, da se to stori po predlagani reformi.
The ruling obliges the EU to implement changes by 1 July 2005 and the Commission proposes to do this through the proposed reform.
Vendar pa pripravljavec mnenja meni, da bi EU morala razmisliti o naslednjih dejstvih:
However, the draftsman considers that the EU should consider the following factors:
ü Uveljavitev nove uredbe 1. julija 2005 bi lahko državam (vključno z Andsko skupnostjo in državami Srednje Amerike), ki trenutno koristijo iz posebnih ureditev GSP (pravice delavcev, varstvo okolja in za boj proti proizvodnji in trgovini z drogami), povzročila ogromno škodo.
ü If the new regulation enters into force on 1 July 2005, this could potentially cause enormous damage for the countries currently benefiting from the GSP special arrangements (labour rights, protection of the environment and to combat drug production and trafficking), including the Andean Community and Central American countries.
Teoretično se bodo usposobili za podobna pravila (GSP plus), za priprave na to pa bodo potrebovali več kot tri mesece.
They will, in theory, qualify for a similar regime (GSP plus) but they will need more than three months to prepare for it.
Nekatere države, tako kot Salvador, bi morale pred ratifikacijo konvencij spremeniti celo svojo ustavo.
Some countries, like El Salvador, would need to reform their Constitutions before ratifying some of the conventions.
ü Časovni načrt, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, je v nasprotju z nekaterimi načeli, ki jih je pred tem sama navajala:
ü The timetable proposed by the Commission goes against some of the principles previously stated by the Commission itself:
- potreba po konkretnem posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi
- the need for a meaningful consultation with stakeholders
- potreba po predvidljivosti za gospodarske subjekte
- the need for predictability for economic operators
- potreba, da se carinske uprave pripravijo na uporabo novega sistema
- the need for customs administrations to prepare themselves to apply a new system
Glede na to pripravljavec mnenja v svojih predlogih sprememb predlaga, da se znova načrtuje datum 1. januar 2006, medtem pa spodbuja Komisijo in Svet, da poiščeta alternativne rešitve, da ugodita predpisom STO, ne da bi datum uveljavitve sedanje uredbe spreminjala na zgodnejši datum.
In consequence, in his amendments the draftsman proposes to return to the scheduled date of 1 January 2006, while he encourages the Commission and the Council to look for alternative solutions in order to comply with the WTO ruling without bringing forward the date of entry into force of the current regulation.
Poleg tega je pripravljavec mnenja predlagal spremembe v nekaterih členih, da bi tako kot možne vire informacij in nadzora nad uresničevanjem ustreznih konvencij vključil predstavnike Evropskega parlamenta in civilne družbe.
Furthermore, the draftsman has proposed changes to some articles, in order to include the European Parliament and civil society representatives as potential sources of information and verification for the implementation of relevant conventions.
Končno pa je pripravljavec mnenja predlagal majhne spremembe v pripravljanju osnutka nekaterih členov, saj je tako želel pojasniti njihovo pravno vsebino.
Finally, the draftsman has proposed minor changes in the drafting of some articles, with a view to clarifying their legal meaning.
Pripravljavec mnenja namerava dodatna vprašanja nasloviti v nadaljnjih predlogih sprememb svojemu osnutku besedila po posvetovanju z ustreznimi zainteresiranimi.
The draftsman intends to address additional issues in further amendments to his own draft text, once he has consulted relevant stakeholders.
To bo še posebej zadevalo:
This will particularly affect:
ü Pravila o poreklu.
ü The rules of origin.
V sporočilu je Komisija izrazila, da namerava spremeniti sistem pravil o poreklu na ravni oblike, vsebine in postopkov, priznava pa, da je zapletenost teh določb eden od glavnih vzrokov premajhne uporabe trgovinskih preferencialov GSP, še posebej v primeru najmanj razvitih držav.
In the Communication, the Commission stated its intention to reform the system of rules of origin in form, substance and procedures, recognising that the complexity of these provisions is one of the main reasons for the under-utilisation of GSP trade preferences, particularly by Least Developed Countries.
Osnutek uredbe pa ne prestavlja nikakršnih sprememb sedanjemu sistemu.
However, the draft regulation presents no change at all to the current system.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta je jasno izražala soglasno sprejeta resolucija 14. oktobra: širjenje medregionalne kumulacije in razmislek o celoviti oziroma svetovni kumulaciji.
The position of the EP was clearly stated in the resolution unanimously adopted on 14 October: expansion to cross-regional cumulation, and consideration of full or global cumulation.
Pripravljavec mnenja namerava zaprositi EP, da v času naslednje revizije uredbe v okviru obdobja treh let naroči neodvisno strokovno revizijo tega vprašanja, ki jo Komisiji in Svetu pošlje v razmislek.
The draftsman intends to ask the EP to commission an independent expert review of this issue, to be sent to the Commission and the Council for consideration, in time for the next review of the regulation within three years.
Ob priznavanju, da je GSP EU najbolj radodarna trgovinska shema preferencialov, ki jo katere koli razvite države nudijo državam v razvoju, bi pripravljavec mnenja rad ponovil, da Komisija v tem osnutku uredbe ni izčrpala vseh možnosti.
Recognising that the EU GSP is the most generous trade preference scheme offered by any developed countries to the developing world, the draftsman would like to recall that in this draft regulation the Commission has not gone as far as it could.
EU bi se lahko soočila s problemom odprave prefencialov na tri načine: z razširitvijo seznama izdelkov, ki jih pokriva sistem; s prekvalificiranjem nekaterih izdelkov, trenutno opredeljenih s kategorijo "občutljivo", v kategorijo "normalno"; in z razširitvijo preferencialnega razpona za obe kategoriji.
The EU could use three tools to tackle the problem of erosion of preferences: enlarge the list of products covered by the system, move some products from the "sensitive" category to the "non sensitive" and increase the preferential margins for both categories.
V tem osnutku uredbe se je Komisija odločila uporabiti le prvo možnost in je na seznam izdelkov, ki jih pokriva sistem, vključila okrog 300 novih izdelkov.
In this draft regulation the Commission has decided to apply only the first possibility by including some 300 new products in the list of products covered by the system.
To morda lahko zadostuje za prva tri leta, Odbor za razvoj pa naj Komisijo in Svet vzpodbudi, da razmislita tudi o ostalih dveh možnostih.
This may be enough for the fist three years, but the Development Committee should encourage the Commission and the Council to start looking at the other two possibilities as well.
To bo še posebej primerno, če bo po uspešnem zaključku pogajalskega kroga v Dohi odprava preferencialov še bolj pereča.
This will be especially relevant if, as a result of a successful conclusion of the Doha Round the erosion of preferences becomes more acute.
Pripravljavec mnenja bo po upoštevanju vidikov zainteresiranih strani zagotovo naslovil nadaljnje točke v svojih prihodnjih predlogih sprememb.
The draftsman will certainly address further points in his future amendments after taking into account the view of interested parties.
Te zajemajo: socialni dialog (vključitev sindikatov v revizijo zahtev GSP "plus"), prilagoditvene klavzule (varnostne določbe, člen 15) in globlje analize na novo predlaganih mehanizmov razvrščanja (ki temeljijo izključno na merilih tržnega deleža, člen 13).
These are: social dialogue (involvement of Trade Unions in the revision of GSP "plus" requirements), revision clauses (safeguard provisions, Article 15) and a deeper analysis of the new proposed graduation mechanism (based exclusively on market share criteria, Article 13).
Odbor za razvoj poziva Odbor za mednarodno trgovino kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Uvodna izjava 1a (novo)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Splošni sistem preferencialov (GSP) je od svojega nastanka eden od ključnih instrumentov za pomoč državam v razvoju pri zmanjševanju revščine tako, da jim z mednarodno trgovino pomaga ustvariti dohodek in prispeva k njihovemu trajnostnemu razvoju s spodbujanjem industrijskega razvoja in raznovrstnosti gospodarstva.
(1a) Since its creation, the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) has been one of the key instruments to assist developing countries to reduce poverty by helping them to generate revenue through international trade and to contribute to their sustainable development by promoting industrial development and the diversification of their economies.
Pripravljavec osnutka želi poudariti, da je prvi in skupni cilj sheme pomagati državam v razvoju pri zmanjševanju revščine.
The draftsman wants to underscore that the first and overall objective of the scheme is to assist developing countries to reduce poverty.
Na podlagi tega tarifnega režima se lahko izplačilo teh preferencialov državam upravičenkam začasno ustavi.
Under this arrangement tariffs are therefore suspended for the beneficiary countries.
Uvodna izjava 16 a (novo)
Recital 16 a (new)