natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Besedna zveza "evropski izvršilni nalog" je bila spremenjena v celotnem besedilu.
As the term ‘European enforcement order’ has been amended throughout the text.
Pristojni organ države izvršiteljice, kakor hitro je to mogoče in največ v treh tednih od prejema evropskega izvršilnega naloga, odloči o njegovi izvršitvi.
The competent authority in the executing State shall, as quickly as possible and in any case within a maximum of three weeks of receipt of the European enforcement order, decide whether to enforce it.
Pristojni organ države izvršiteljice, kakor hitro je to mogoče, odloči , ali se prizna sodba in izvrši kazenska sankcija, ter o tem obvesti državo izdajateljico, vključno z vsemi odločitvami v zvezi s kazensko sankcijo v skladu s členom 8(2) in (3).
The competent authority in the executing State shall decide as quickly as possible whether to recognise the judgment and enforce the sentence and shall inform the issuing State thereof, including of any decision regarding the sentence in accordance with Article 8 paragraphs 2 and 3.
Roki morajo biti kratki, ampak stvarni.
Time limits need to be brief but realistic.
Člen 10, odstavek 1 b (novo)
Article 10, paragraph 1 b (new)
V takšnih primerih se lahko roki podaljšajo za dodatnih 30 dni.
In such a case, the time limits may be extended by a further 30 days.
Če se oseba, za katero je bil izdan evropski izvršilni nalog, nahaja v državi izdajateljici, se čimprej premesti v državo izvršiteljico , ob času, o katerem se dogovorijo pristojni organi države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice .
If a person in respect of whom a European enforcement order has been issued is in the issuing State, the person shall be transferred to the executing State as quickly as possible at a time agreed between the competent authorities of the issuing and the executing State.
Če je obsojena oseba v državi izdajateljici, se premesti v državo izvršiteljico najpozneje v 30 dneh, potem ko država izvršiteljica sprejme pravnomočno odločbo o priznavanju sodbe in izvršitvi kazenske sankcije .
If a sentenced person is in the issuing State, the person shall be transferred to the executing State and no later than 30 days after the final decision of the executing State on the recognition of the judgment and enforcement of the sentence has been taken.
Oseba se premesti najpozneje dva tedna po pravnomočnosti odločbe o izvršitvi evropskega izvršilnega naloga.
The person shall be transferred no later than two weeks after the final decision on the enforcement of the European enforcement order has been taken.
Če je v obdobju, določenem v odstavku 2 , premestitev osebe zaradi nepredvidljivih okoliščin preprečena, pristojni organi države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice nemudoma navežejo stik in se dogovorijo o novem datumu premestitve .
If the transfer of the person within the period laid down in paragraph 2 is prevented by unforeseeable circumstances, the competent authorities of the issuing and executing States shall immediately contact each other and agree on a new transfer date.
Če je v obdobju, določenem v odstavku 1 , premestitev osebe zaradi nepredvidljivih okoliščin preprečena, pristojni organi države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice nemudoma navežejo stik.
If the transfer of the person within the period laid down in paragraph 1 is prevented by unforeseen circumstances, the competent authorities of the issuing and executing States shall immediately contact each other .
Premestitev se izvrši, kakor hitro te okoliščine prenehajo.
Transfer shall take place as soon as these circumstances have ceased to exist.
Pristojni organ države izdajateljice takoj obvesti pristojni organ države izvršiteljice ter se dogovori o novem datumu premestitve.
The competent authority of the issuing State shall immediately inform the competent authority of the executing State and agree on a new transfer date.
V tem primeru se premestitev opravi v roku 10 dni po dogovorjenem novem datumu.
In that event, transfer shall take place within 10 days of the new date thus agreed .
V skladu s členom 23(4) okvirnega sklepa o evropskem nalogu za prijetje.
In accordance with Article 23 paragraph 4 of the Framework decision of the European Arrest Warrant.
Vsaka država članica dovoli tranzit preko svojega ozemlja za obsojeno osebo , ki se premešča v državo izvršiteljico , pod pogojem, da je dobila podatke o :
Each Member State shall permit the transit through its territory of a sentenced person who is being transferred to the executing State provided that it has been given information on :
Vsako državo članico se obvesti o tranzitu obsojene osebe , ki se jo premešča v državo izvršiteljico prek njenega ozemlja , in se ji predloži kopijo potrdila države izdajateljice .
Each Member State concerned shall be informed of the transit through its territory of a sentenced person who is being transferred to the executing State and should be provided with a copy of the certificate by the issuing State.
(a) identiteti in državljanstvu osebe, za katero je izdan evropski izvršilni nalog;
(a) the identity and nationality of the person who is the subject of the European enforcement order;
(b) obstoju evropskega izvršilnega naloga;
(b) the existence of a European enforcement order;
(c) vrsti in pravni klasifikaciji kaznivega dejanja, ki je podlaga za evropski izvršilni nalog;
(c) the nature and legal classification of the offence underlying the European enforcement order;
(d) opisu okoliščin kaznivega dejanja, vključno z datumom in krajem.
(d) the description of the circumstances of the offence, including date and place.
Informacije in prepoved tranzita bi zmanjšale birokratičnost postopka.
Information and not permission of the transit would make things less bureaucratic.
Prošnja za tranzit osebe in podatki iz odstavka 1 se lahko posredujejo na kateri koli način, ki omogoča pisni zapis.
The transit request and the information referred to in paragraph 1 may be transmitted by any means capable of producing a written record.
Država članica tranzita uradno sporoči svojo odločitev, ki jo sprejme prednostno in najpozneje en teden po prejemu prošnje po enakem postopku.
The Member State of transit shall notify its decision, which shall be taken on a priority basis and not later than one week after having received the request by the same procedure.
Prošnja za tranzit osebe in potrdilo iz odstavka 1 se lahko posredujejo na kateri koli način, ki omogoča pisni zapis.
The transit request and the certificate referred to in paragraph 1 may be transmitted by any means capable of producing a written record.
Prošnja za tranzit ni potrebna v primeru zračnega prevoza brez načrtovanega vmesnega pristanka.
A transit request is not required in the case of transport by air without a scheduled stopover.
Vendar pa, če pride do nenačrtovanega pristanka, država izdajateljica predloži podatke iz odstavka 1.
However, if an unscheduled landing occurs, the issuing State shall provide the information provided for in paragraph 1.
Podatki o tranzitu niso potrebni v primeru zračnega prevoza brez načrtovanega vmesnega pristanka.
A transit information is not required in the case of transport by air without a scheduled stopover.
Vendar pa, če pride do nenačrtovanega pristanka, država izdajateljica v 48 urah predloži podatke iz odstavka 1.
However, if an unscheduled landing occurs, the issuing State shall provide the information provided for in paragraph 1 within 48 hours .
Izvrševanje evropskega izvršilnega naloga je urejeno s pravom države izvršiteljice na enak način kot so urejene kazenske sankcije, ki jih izreče ta država .
The enforcement of a European enforcement order shall be governed by the law of the executing State in the same way as sentences imposed by that State.
Samo organi države izvršiteljice so, v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3, pristojni za odločanje o postopkih izvrševanja in določanje vseh s tem povezanih ukrepov, vključno z razlogi za pogojni odpust.
The authorities of the executing State alone shall, subject to paragraphs 2 and 3, be competent to decide on the procedures for enforcement and to determine all the measures relating thereto, including the grounds for conditional release.
Izvrševanje kazenske sankcije je urejeno s pravom države izvršiteljice.
The enforcement of a sentence shall be governed by the law of the executing State.
Samo organi države izvršiteljice so, v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3, pristojni za odločanje o postopkih izvrševanja in določanje vseh s tem povezanih ukrepov, vključno z razlogi za pogojni odpust.
The authorities of the executing State alone shall, subject to paragraphs 2, and 3 be competent to decide on the procedures for enforcement and to determine all the measures relating thereto, including the grounds for early or conditional release.
Pristojni organ države izvršiteljice v zvezi s kazensko sankcijo, zaradi katere je bil izdan evropski izvršilni nalog , od skupnega obdobja trajanja odvzema prostosti, ki ga je treba prestati v državi izvršiteljici, odšteje vsako že prestano obdobje odvzema prostosti v državi izdajateljici ali drugi državi .
The competent authority of the executing State shall deduct any period of deprivation of liberty served in the issuing State or in another State in connection with the sentence in respect of which the European enforcement order is issued from the total duration of the deprivation of liberty to be served in the executing State.
Pristojni organ države izvršiteljice v zvezi s kazensko sankcijo, glede katere je bila izrečena sodba , od skupnega obdobja trajanja odvzema prostosti, ki ga je treba prestati v državi izvršiteljici, odšteje celotno obdobje odvzema prostosti , ki ga je obsojena oseba že prestala .
The competent authority of the executing State shall deduct the full period of deprivation of liberty already served by the sentenced person in connection with the sentence in respect of which the judgment is issued from the total duration of the deprivation of liberty to be served in the executing State.
Razen če ni drugače dogovorjeno med državo izdajateljico in državo izvršiteljico, se pogojni odpust lahko dovoli le, če je obsojena oseba skupaj prestala vsaj polovico kazni v državi izdajateljici in državi izvršiteljici.
Unless otherwise agreed between the issuing and the executing States, conditional release may only be granted if the sentenced person has served a total of at least half the sentence in the issuing and executing States.
Razen če ni drugače dogovorjeno med državo izdajateljico in državo izvršiteljico, se pogojni odpust lahko dovoli le, če je obsojena oseba skupaj prestala vsaj polovico kazni v državi izdajateljici in državi izvršiteljici oziroma je obsojena oseba prestala določeno dolžino kazni, ki je v skladu s pravom države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice.
Unless otherwise agreed between the issuing and the executing States, conditional release may only be granted if the sentenced person has served a total of at least half the sentence in the issuing and executing States or a sentence of a specific duration which is consistent with the law of the issuing and executing States.
Strokovni odbor Sveta Evrope o veljavnosti evropskih konvencij na področju kazenskega prava je v svojem mnenju z 22. januarja izrazil nasprotovanje dejstvu, da bi opredelitev najkrajšega možnega prestajanja kazni lahko škodovala prožnosti in bi onemogočila vsakršno rešitev posameznih primerov.
In its opinion of 22 January, the Council of Europe’s Committee of Experts on the Operation of the European Conventions in the Penal Field objected to the fact that laying down a minimum term would prove to be to the detriment of flexibility and would prevent any solution on a case-by-case basis.
Zaradi tega se je odbor izrekel za načelo "dolžine kazni, ki ustreza namenu pravičnosti".
The committee therefore came out in favour of a measure based on the idea of ‘a period of specific duration which is consistent with the purposes of justice’.
Načelo specialnosti je treba vključiti, da se zagotovi varstvo pravic obsojenih oseb, saj njihovo soglasje odpade.
The specialty rule must be incuded in order to provide for a protection of the rights of the sentenced persons since his concent is eliminated.
Amnestijo ali pomilostitev lahko podata država izdajateljica in tudi država izvršiteljica.
An amnesty or pardon may be granted by the issuing State and also by the executing State.
Amnestijo ali pomilostitev lahko podata država izdajateljica po posvetovanju z državo izvršiteljico ali država izvršiteljica.
An amnesty or pardon may be granted by the issuing State in consultation with the executing State, or by the executing State .
Ni sprejemljivo, da ima država izdajateljica pravico do amnestije ali pomilostitve, če je bila obsojena oseba premeščena v državo izvršiteljico in se nato uporablja pravo te države.
It is not acceptable for the issuing State to have the right to amnesty or pardon if the sentenced person has been transferred to the executing State and the law of that State then applies.
Člen 17, točka (b)
Article 17, point (b)
(b) o kateri koli odločitvi o zavrnitvi priznanja in izvršitve evropskega izvršilnega naloga v skladu s členom 9, skupaj z obrazložitvijo take odločitve;
(b) of any decision not to recognise and enforce a European enforcement order in accordance with Article 9, together with the reasons for the decision;
(b) o kateri koli odločitvi o popolni ali delni zavrnitvi priznanja sodbe in izvršitve kazenske sankcije v skladu s členom 9, skupaj z obrazložitvijo take odločitve;
(b) of any decision not to recognise the judgment and enforce the sentence in accordance with Article 9, either in whole or in part , together with the reasons for the decision;
Člen 17, točka (c)
Article 17, point (c)
(c) o prilagoditvi kazenske sankcije v skladu s členom 8(2) ali (3), skupaj z obrazložitvijo take odločitve;
(c) of the adaptation of the sentence in accordance with Article 8(2) or (3), together with the reasons for the decision;
(c) o vsaki odločitvi v zvezi s kazensko sankcijo v skladu s členom 8(2) ali (3), skupaj z obrazložitvijo take odločitve in ob upoštevanju razlik med pravom zadevnih držav članic ;
(c) of any decision regarding the sentence in accordance with Article 8(2) or (3), together with the reasons for the decision, and taking into account the differences in the law of the Member States concerned ;
Posebna pozornost je potrebna v zvezi z razlikami glede kazni, ki jih predpisujejo države članice.
Particular caution is required regarding the differences in the penalties prescribed between Member States
Člen 17, točka (d)
Article 17, point (d)
(d) o popolni ali delni zavrnitvi izvršitve naloga zaradi razlogov, navedenih v členu 8(4), 13(1) in 15(1) – skupaj z obrazložitvijo take odločitve – in, v primeru delne zavrnitve izvršitve zaradi razlogov, navedenih v členu 8(4), o zahtevi za uradno obvestilo o tem, kateri del kazenske sankcije se nanaša na zadevna dejanja ;
(d) of the total or partial non-enforcement of the order for the reasons referred to in Articles 8(4), 13(1) and 15(1) – together with the reasons for the decision – and, in the event of partial non ‑enforcement for the reason referred to in Article 8(4), a request to be notified which part of the sentence relates to the acts in question;
(d) o popolni ali delni zavrnitvi izvršitve kazenske sankcije zaradi razlogov, navedenih v členu 13(1) in členu 15(1), skupaj z obrazložitvijo take odločitve;
(d) of the total or partial non-enforcement of the sentence for the reasons referred to in Articles 13(1) and 15(1) together with the reasons for the decision;
Člen 17, točka (e)
Article 17, point (e)
(e) o dejstvu, da zadevna oseba ni pričela s prestajanjem kazni brez razloga;
(e) of the fact that the person concerned has not started serving the sentence without reason;
Člen 17, točka (g a) (novo)
Article 17, point (g a) (new)
(ga) ko je sodba priznana in sprejeta.
( ga ) once the judgment has been recognised and accepted.
Potrdilo, za katerega se uporabi standardni obrazec iz Priloge, je treba prevesti v uradni jezik ali enega od uradnih jezikov države izvršiteljice.
The certificate, the standard form which is set in the Annex, must be translated into the official language or one of the official languages of the executing State.
To je pobuda Avstrije, Finske in Švedske z namenom, da se pospeši postopek premeščanja obsojenih oseb v določeno državo, s katero je ta oseba nekako povezana ter za katero se meni, da se tam lahko doseže najboljša družbena rehabilitacija obsojene osebe.
This is an initiative by Austria, Finland and Sweden aimed at speeding up the process of transferring sentenced persons to a particular State with which that person is linked in some way and where it is thought likely that optimum social rehabilitation can be achieved.
Okvirni sklep zagotavlja hiter mehanizem, da država članica, katere državljan je ta oseba, v kateri ima zakonito stalno prebivališče ali s katero ima tesne vezi, prizna in izvrši kazenske sankcije, vključno z odvzemom prostosti ali varnostnimi ukrepi (v primeru neprištevnosti ali zmanjšane kazenske odgovornosti), ki jih je tej osebi izreklo sodišče druge države članice.
The Framework Decision provides for a fast-track mechanism for the recognition and enforcement by a Member State of which that person is a national, where he is legally resident or has close links, of sentences involving deprivation of freedom or security measures (in the case of insanity or diminished responsibility) which have been imposed on that person by a court of another Member State.
Pobuda upošteva sklepe iz Tampereja in zlasti krepitev vzajemnega priznavanja sklepov v kazenskih zadevah, spodbujanje vzajemnega zaupanja med nacionalnimi sodnimi organi, razvoj povezovalne politike v kazenskih zadevah s strani Unije za učinkovit boj proti vsem oblikam težjih kaznivih dejanj, zlasti z določanjem minimalnih kazenskih sankcij.
The initiative takes account of the Tampere conclusions and, in particular, the strengthening of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters, the encouragement of mutual confidence between the national judicial authorities, the development by the Union of a cohesive policy in criminal matters in order to combat effectively serious crime in all its forms, particularly in laying down minimum sentences.
V skladu s konvencijo Sveta Evrope o premestitvi obsojenih oseb z dne 21. marca 1983, ki so jo ratificirale vse države članice, je premestitev obsojenih oseb zaradi prestajanja preostalega dela kazni mogoča le v državo njihovega državljanstva in le z njihovim soglasjem ter s soglasjem zadevnih držav.
Under the Council of Europe Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons of 21 March 1983, which all the Member States have ratified, sentenced persons may be transferred to serve the remainder of their sentence only to their State of nationality and only with their consent and that of the States involved.
Dodatni protokol h konvenciji z dne 18. decembra 1997, ki ga niso ratificirale vse države članice, to je treba omeniti, omejuje obseg soglasja obsojene osebe.
The Additional Protocol to the Convention of 18 December 1997, which, it should be noted, not all Member States have ratified, restricts the scope of the sentenced person's consent.
Mnenja so se prvič izmenjala v Odboru za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve dne ... in razdeljen je bil delovni dokument.
A first exchange of views took place within the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on the ... and a working document was distributed.
Cilj predloga
Aim of the proposal
Izvirno besedilo (7307/05 COPEN 54) je že spremenila pristojna delovna skupina Sveta in v dokumentu pripravila naslednje ključne točke:
The original text (7307/05 COPEN 54) has already been amended by the responsible Council working party, producing the following key points in the document:
· uporablja se sistem potrdila (standardni obrazec), ki se posreduje za izvršitev skupaj z nalogom, ki določa kazensko sankcijo, v skladu s členom 7(1) Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o vzajemnem priznavanju denarnih kazni (UL L 76, 22. marec 2005), namesto evropskega naloga za prijetje, na katerega se je skliceval izvirni delovni dokument;
· the system used is a certificate (standard form) which is forwarded for enforcement together with the order imposing the sentence, along the lines of Article 7, paragraph 1 of the Framework Decision on mutual recognition of financial penalties (OJ L 76, 22 March 2005) instead of the European arrest warrant, to which the original working document referred;
· merila za premeščanje obsojene osebe iz ene države članice v drugo, da bi tam prestala preostanek kazni, so: (a) državljanstvo skupaj z zakonitim prebivališčem, (b) zakonito stalno prebivališče in (c) država, s premestitvijo v katero se obsojena oseba strinja in s katero ima tesne vezi.
· the criteria for transferring a sentenced person from one Member State to another in order for him to serve the rest of his sentence there are: (a) nationality together with legal residence, (b) permanent legal residence, and (c) the State to which the sentenced person consents to be transferred and with which he has close links.
Postopek posredovanja naloga v državo izvršiteljico vsebuje določbo, ki določa ustno ali pisno predložitev mnenj obsojene osebe, če ta nima pravice do pritožbe;
In the process of forwarding the order to the executing State, provision is made for oral or written submission of the sentenced person's views if he does not have the right of appeal;
· seznam 32 kaznivih dejanj, enak seznamu iz okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/JHA o evropskem nalogu za prijetje, za katera ni potrebno ugotavljanje dvojne kaznivosti storjenega dejanja, da se prizna in izvrši kazenska sankcija, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti;
· a list of 32 offences, identical to that contained in Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant, for which no verification of the double criminality of the act is required in order to recognise and enforce a sentence involving deprivation of liberty;
· postopek za prilagoditev, v določenih okoliščinah, kazenske sankcije drugi kazni, ki je združljiva s pravom države izvršiteljice, če je kazenska sankcija nezdružljiva zaradi svojega trajanja ali narave.
· a procedure for adapting, under certain circumstances, the sanction to another penalty compatible with the law of the executing State, if that sanction is incompatible in terms of its duration or nature.
V vsakem primeru mora biti predlog v skladu z določbami člena 10(2) konvencije Sveta Evrope o premestitvi obsojenih oseb z dne 21. marca 1983, ki uporablja načelo „neprekinjenega izvrševanja“ in ne „prilagoditve kazenske sankcije“, ki nasprotuje načelu vzajemnega priznavanja.
At all events, the proposal must be consistent with the provisions of Article 10, paragraph 2, of the Council of Europe Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons of 21 March 1983 which applies the principle of 'continued enforcement' and not that of "adapting the sanction", which is contrary to the principle of mutual recognition.
Kazenske sankcije v nobenem primeru ni mogoče spremeniti v denarno kazen, prav tako ne more biti višja od kazenske sankcije, ki je bila izrečena v državi izdajateljici;
There are no circumstances under which the sanction can be converted into a financial penalty and nor is it possible for the sanction to be more severe than the penalty imposed in the issuing State;
· razlogi za nepriznavanje in neizvršitev naloga so: (a) neizpolnitev potrdila, (b) neizpolnjevanje meril, na katerih temelji premestitev obsojene osebe, (c) kršitev načela "ne bis in idem", (d) obsodba za kaznivo dejanje, ki ni na seznamu iz člena 7, (e) zastaranje, (f) azil ali posebna pravica, (g) odsotnost kazenske odgovornosti osebe in (h) manj kot štirje meseci do konca prestajanja kazni.
· grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement of the order include: (a) failure to fill in the certificate, (b) failure to meet the criteria on which the transfer of the sentenced person is based, (c) infringement of the principle of " ne bis in ide " ', (d) conviction of an offence not listed in Article 7, (e) statute-barring, (f) the existence of asylum or privilege, (g) absence of criminal liability of the person, and (h) remainder of the sentence to serve less than four months.
Stališče poročevalca
View of the Rapporteur