natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Odvetnik, ki mora razkriti sumljivo transakcijo enoti za finančni nadzor, postane pomožni zastopnik države.
A lawyer who is required to disclose a suspect transaction to the financial information unit becomes an auxiliary agent of the State.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti
In this connection it would be as well to point out that the Court of Justice of the European Communities
Zaupen odnos, ki je bistven za sklenitev pogodbe med odvetnikom in stranko, predvideva, da se lahko slednji odkrito zaupa svetovalcu in da lahko odvetnik – ki dela nepristransko – svoji stranki primerno pravno svetuje.
The relationship of trust which is fundamental to the conclusion of a contract between a lawyer and his client presupposes that the latter is free to confide in an adviser unreservedly and that the lawyer - acting impartially - is able to give his client suitable legal advice.
Če pa se od odvetnika že od samega začetka poslovanja s stranko zahteva, da pravzaprav dela v imenu tretje stranke in da izvede predhodno preiskavo, s katero preveri identiteto stranke in osnovni namen strankine zahteve v zvezi s svetovanjem, bo razvrednotil svojo vlogo.
However, if the lawyer is required from the outset of his dealings with his client to work in effect on behalf of a third party and to carry out a preliminary investigation in order to ascertain the client's identity and the ultimate aim of the client's request for advice, he will debase his role.
Če pa ne obstaja več odvetnik, ki učinkuje kot filter, bo še težje preprečiti storitve kaznivih dejanj – kar je pravo nasprotje od tega, kar želi doseči obravnavana zakonodaja.
And if there is no longer any lawyer involved to act as a filter, it will be even harder to prevent criminal acts from being perpetrated - which is the precise opposite of what the legislation under consideration is intended to achieve.
Peticija 693/03 se nanaša na Direktivo 2001/97/ES, ki spreminja prejšnjo Direktivo 91/308/EGS, ki naj bi jo razveljavil nov predlog.
Petition 693/03 refers to Directive 2001/97/EC amending the earlier directive 91/308/EEC, which the new proposal is intended to repeal.
Vendar pa peticijo podpirajo strokovna združenja v Franciji, Belgiji, Nemčiji, Italiji, Španiji in na Poljskem ter evropska odvetniška združenja.
However, the petition is supported by professional bodies in France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain and Poland, and also by European lawyers' associations.
Od leta 2001 morajo zainteresirane stranke trpeti posledice tega nazadnjaškega tolmačenja pravice.
Since 2001 the interested parties have had to suffer the consequences of this obscurantist interpretation of justice.
V skladu s členom 2 Direktive 2001 je Komisija morala predložiti (tri leta po začetku veljavnosti direktive) poročilo, ki je ocenilo način ravnanja z odvetniki in drugimi neodvisnimi pravnimi strokovnjaki.
Pursuant to Article 2 of the 2001 Directive, the Commission was required to submit (three years after the directive came into force) a report assessing the way in which lawyers and other independent legal professionals had been treated.
Komisija mora še začeti ravnati v skladu s to zahtevo.
The Commission has yet to comply with that requirement.
Res je, da je v tem času Delovna skupina za finančno ukrepanje (FATF – Financial Action Task Force) predložila 40 priporočil za boj proti terorizmu in njegovemu financiranju, vendar pa to ne opravičuje splošnega zavračanja številnih protestov zainteresiranih strank, ki so pozivale k podpori temeljnih pravic in svoboščin.
It is true that, in the meantime, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has put forward 40 recommendations for combating terrorism and the financing thereof, but this does not justify the wholesale dismissal of the countless protests expressed by interested parties calling for fundamental rights and freedoms to be upheld.
Trditev, da je bil glavni vzrok za odločitev o razveljavitvi obstoječih direktiv, med drugim, potreba po jasnosti, še zdaleč ni jasna, če gre soditi po branju novega besedila, ki ga sestavlja celih 43 členov.
The claim that the decision to repeal the existing directives was dictated - amongst other things - by the need for clarity is far from clear from a reading of the new wording of no fewer than 43 articles.
Novo besedilo razlikuje (na težko razumljiv način) med poenostavljenimi in razširjenimi zahtevami glede potrebne skrbnosti ter prepoveduje kakršno koli razkritje dejstva, da so podatki posredovani enoti za finančni nadzor (čeprav je dovoljeno neke vrste odstopanje v primeru notarjev in drugih neodvisnih pravnih strokovnjakov [glej člen 25(2)], medtem ko je nov Odbor za preprečevanje pranja denarja v skladu s členoma 37 in 38 pridobil veliko možnost presoje pri izvajanju tehničnih vidikov in izbiri različnih podrobnih pravil prepoznavanja.
The new text incorporates the distinction (not an easy one to grasp) between simplified and enhanced 'due diligence' requirements and it places a ban on any disclosure of the fact that information has been forwarded to the financial intelligence unit (although a pseudo-derogation is allowed in the case of notaries and other independent legal professionals [see Article 25(2)], whilst under Articles 37 and 38 a new Committee on the Prevention of Money Laundering has been given plenty of scope for discretion in the implementation of technical aspects and in the selection of the various detailed identification rules.
Omenjeno je pomembno zaradi tako imenovane uskladitve med zahtevami pravne varnosti in zahtevami javnega reda.
All of this is in the name of a so-called reconciliation between the requirements of legal certainty and the requirements of public order.
Nerešeno pa ostaja jezikovno vprašanje iz peticije 177/2002 (predložil Consejo General de la Abogancia Española ) v zvezi z dvomljivim prevodom dela besedila v več jezikov, v skladu s katerim so nekateri neodvisni pravni strokovnjaki (vključno z odvetniki) oproščeni obveznosti, da morajo zagotoviti podatke v okviru preverjanja pravnega položaja svojih strank (glej člen 6(3) Direktive 2001/97/ES in člen 20(2) obravnavanega predloga).
Still unresolved is the linguistic matter raised in petition 177/2002 (submitted by the Consejo General de la Abogancia Española ) concerning the dubious translation into many languages of the section of the text pursuant to which certain independent legal professionals (including lawyers) are exempted from the obligation to provide information in the course of ascertaining the legal situation of their clients (see Article 6(3) of Directive 2001/97/EC and Article 20(2) of the proposal under consideration).
To pa je zelo nejasen in nedoločen koncept, pri katerem vztraja Komisija – španskim vlagateljem peticije je dala nekoliko zapleten odgovor.
This is an inherently very vague concept which the Commission persists in using - having provided the Spanish petitioners with a somewhat Byzantine reply.
Poudariti je treba, da so druge države članice FATF (od Kanade do ZDA) – v interesu varstva pravice do obrambe posameznika – zagotovile moratorij na izvajanje 40 priporočil, namenjenih preprečevanju pranja denarja.
It must be pointed out that, in the interests of safeguarding the individual's right of defence, other FATF member states (from Canada to the USA) have secured a moratorium on the implementation of the 40 recommendations designed to prevent money laundering.
Poleg tega so po švicarskem pravu dejavnosti odvetnikov in notarjev jasno izključene iz ukrepov za preprečevanje pranja denarja, s čimer se priznava, da ima v takšnih primerih prednost poklicna tajnost.
Furthermore, under Swiss law the activities of lawyers and notaries are specifically excluded from the scope of the measures designed to prevent money laundering, it being recognised that, in such matters, professional confidentiality has precedence.
Zato odbor poziva k umiku predloga in k njegovi ponovni predložitvi po izvedbi predhodne ocene iz Bourlangesovega poročila ( A6-0010/2004 ) in/ali pripravi ocenjevalnega poročila iz člena 2 Direktive 2001/97/ES.
The committee therefore calls for the proposal to be withdrawn and to be resubmitted once the preliminary assessment referred to in the Bourlanges Report ( A6-0010/2004 ) has been carried out and/or the assessment report referred to in Article 2 of Directive 2001/97/EC has been drawn up.
Odbor poziva tudi k sprejemu naslednjih predlogov sprememb besedila:
The committee also calls for the following amendments to be made to the text:
Odbor za peticije poziva Odbor za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Petitions calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Člen 2, odstavek 1, točka 3 b
Article 2, paragraph 1, point 3 b)
(b) notarje in druge neodvisne pravne strokovnjake, ko sodelujejo pri kakršnih koli finančnih ali nepremičninskih poslih v imenu svoje stranke in za svojo stranko ali pa pomagajo pri načrtovanju ali izvajanju poslov za svojo stranko v zvezi z:
(b) notaries and other independent legal professionals, when they participate, whether by acting on behalf of and for their client in any financial or real estate transaction, or by assisting in the planning or execution of transactions for their client concerning the:
(i) nakupom in prodajo nepremičnine ali pravnih oseb;
(i) buying and selling of real property or business entities;
(ii) upravljanjem denarja, vrednostnih papirjev ali drugih premoženjskih vrednosti stranke;
(ii) managing of client money, securities or other assets;
(iii) odprtjem ali upravljanjem bančnih, varčevalnih računov ali računov vrednostnih papirjev;
(iii) opening or management of bank, savings or securities accounts;
(iv) organizacijo sredstev, potrebnih za ustanovitev, delovanje ali upravljanje družb;
(iv) organisation of contributions necessary for the creation, operation or management of companies;
(v) ustanovitvijo, delovanjem ali upravljanjem fiduciarnih družb ali podobnih struktur;
(v) creation, operation or management of trust companies or similar structures;
(b) odvetnike, notarje in druge neodvisne pravne strokovnjake, ko sodelujejo pri finančnih ali nepremičninskih poslih v imenu svoje stranke in za svojo stranko ali pa pomagajo pri načrtovanju ali izvajanju poslov za svojo stranko v zvezi z:
(b) lawyers, notaries and other independent legal professionals, when they participate, whether by acting on behalf of and for their client in a financial or real estate transaction, or by assisting in the planning or execution of transactions for their client concerning the:
(v) ustanovitvijo, delovanjem ali upravljanjem fiduciarnih družb ali podobnih struktur,
(v) creation, operation or management of trust companies or similar structures ,
pod pogojem da tako dobljeni podatki od njihovih strank niso povezani z dejavnostmi, za katere velja poklicna tajnost.
provided that the information thus obtained from their clients does not relate to activities covered by professional confidentiality.
Člen 3, točka 12a (novo)
Article 3, point 12 a) (new)
(12a)med „dejavnosti, za katere velja poklicna tajnost“, štejejo preverjanje pravnega položaja strank s strani odvetnikov, notarjev in drugih nepristranskih pravnih strokovnjakov ter opravljanje nalog pri obrambi in/ali zastopanju strank v pravnih ali upravnih postopkih, in opravljanje dejavnosti, v katere so vključeni v okviru postopkov arbitraže in mediacije.
12a) 'activities covered by professional confidentiality' means the ascertainment of the legal situation of the client by the lawyers, notaries and other liberal legal professionals and the performance by them of the duties involved in defending and/or representing the client in the course of legal or administrative procedures and of the activities engaged in by them in connection with arbitration and mediation procedures.
Člen 10, odstavek 3a (novo)
Article 10, paragraph 3a (new)
V vsakem primeru za posebne dejavnosti, pri katerih sodelujejo neodvisni pravni strokovnjaki, iz člena 3(12a) ne veljajo obveznosti, določene v členih 6, 7 in 8 te direktive, če ima dolžnost poklicne tajnosti prednost pred takšnimi obveznostmi.
In any event the specific activities engaged in by the independent legal professionals referred to in Article 3 12a) shall not be subject to the obligations laid down in Article 6, 7 and 8 of this Directive, in so far as the bond of professional confidentiality takes precedence over such obligations.
Države članice niso dolžne uporabiti obveznosti iz člena 19(1) za notarje, neodvisne pravne strokovnjake, revizorje, zunanje računovodje in davčne svetovalce v zvezi s podatki, ki jih prejmejo od svojih strank ali dobijo o svojih strankah pri preverjanju pravnega položaja za svojo stranko ali pri izvajanju obrambe ali zastopanja omenjene stranke v sodnih postopkih ali v zvezi s sodnimi postopki, vključno s svetovanjem o sprožitvi ali izogibanju postopkov, ne glede na to, ali so ti podatki prejeti ali dobljeni pred, med takšnimi postopki ali po njih.
Member States shall not be obliged to apply the obligations laid down in Article 19(1) to notaries, independent legal professionals, auditors, external accountants and tax advisors with regard to information they receive from or obtain on one of their clients, in the course of ascertaining the legal position for their client or performing their task of defending or representing that client in, or concerning judicial proceedings, including advice on instituting or avoiding proceedings, whether such information is received or obtained before, during or after such proceedings.
Države članice niso dolžne uporabiti obveznosti iz člena 19(1) za notarje, neodvisne pravne strokovnjake, revizorje, zunanje računovodje in davčne svetovalce v zvezi s podatki, ki jih prejmejo od svojih strank ali dobijo o svojih strankah pri preverjanju pravnega položaja za svojo stranko ali pri izvajanju obrambe ali zastopanja omenjene stranke v sodnih postopkih ali v zvezi s sodnimi postopki, vključno s svetovanjem o sprožitvi ali izogibanju postopkov, ne glede na to, ali so ti podatki prejeti ali dobljeni pred, med takšnimi postopki ali po njih, ali v okviru postopka arbitraže ali mediacije .
Member States shall not apply the obligations laid down in Article 19(1) to notaries, independent legal professionals, auditors, external accountants and tax advisors with regard to information they receive from or obtain on one of their clients, in the course of ascertaining the legal position for their client or performing their task of defending or representing that client in, or concerning judicial proceedings, including advice on instituting or avoiding proceedings, whether such information is received or obtained before, during or after such proceedings, or within the framework of arbitration or mediation procedures.
Člen 20, odstavek 2, pododstavek 1a (novo)
Article 20, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1a (new)
V vsakem primeru za pravni nasvet, ki ni zagotovljen v nedvomnem okviru pranja denarja, velja izključno dolžnost poklicne tajnosti.
In any event, legal advice - which is not provided within an unmistakable context of money laundering - shall be subject solely to the bond of professional confidentiality.
Člen 21, pododstavek 3 (novo)
Article 21, paragraph 3 (new)
Kadar za neodvisne pravne strokovnjake velja dolžnost poklicne tajnosti, ti strokovnjaki niso zajeti v določbah iz tretjega odstavka.
In so far as independent legal professionals are subject to the bond of professional confidentiality, they shall not be covered by the provisions of the third paragraph.
Člen 25, drugi odstavek
Article 25, second paragraph
Če neodvisni pravni strokovnjaki, notarji, revizorji, računovodje in davčni svetovalci, ki opravljajo svoje delo kot neodvisni pravni strokovnjaki poskušajo stranko odvrniti od pravne dejavnosti, se to ne šteje za razkritje v smislu prvega odstavka.
Where independent legal professionals, notaries, auditors, accountants and tax advisors, acting as independent legal professionals seek to dissuade a client from engaging in illegal activity, this shall not constitute a disclosure within the meaning of the first paragraph.
Prepoved iz prvega odstavka se ne uporablja za tiste dejavnosti pravnih strokovnjakov, pri katerih ima prednost dolžnost poklicne tajnosti.
The prohibition laid down in the above paragraph shall not apply to those activities of legal professionals in which the bond of professional confidentiality takes precedence.
V roku treh let po začetku veljavnosti te direktive in vsaj vsake tri leta po tem Komisija pripravi poročilo o izvajanju te direktive in ga predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Within three years of the entry into force of this Directive, and at least at three yearly intervals thereafter, the Commission shall draw up a report on the implementation of this Directive and submit it to the European Parliament and the Council.
V roku dveh let po začetku veljavnosti te direktive ( in v vsakem primeru pred začetkom veljavnosti Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo) in vsaj vsake tri leta po tem Komisija pripravi poročilo o izvajanju te direktive (s posebnim poudarkom na načinu ravnanja s poklicno tajnostjo odvetnikov in drugih neodvisnih pravnih strokovnjakov) in ga predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Within two years of the entry into force of this Directive - and, in any event, before the Treaty adopting a Constitution for Europe comes into force - and at least at three yearly intervals thereafter, the Commission shall draw up a report on the implementation of this Directive (with particular reference to the way in which the professional confidentiality of lawyers and other independent legal professionals is treated) and submit it to the European Parliament and the Council.
Datum sprejetja sprememb
Date adopted
47(2) in 95 ES
47(2) and 95 EC
o predlogu Direktive Sveta o spremembi Direktive 92/12/EGS o splošnem režimu za trošarinske izdelke ter skladiščenju, gibanju in nadzoru takih izdelkov
on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ..........................14
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 14
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2004)0227 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0227 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 93 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0039/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 93 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0039/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 27 Direktive Sveta 92/12/EGS z dne 25. februarja 1992 o splošnem režimu za trošarinske izdelke ter skladiščenju, gibanju in nadzoru takih izdelkov
– having regard to Article 27 of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products
UL L 76, 23.3.1992, str.
OJ L 76, 23.3.1992, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenja odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6‑0138/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0138/2005 ),
(-1) „Trinajst let po izteku obdobja iz člena 14 Pogodbe ES cilj tega člena še vedno ni dosežen za tobak, alkoholne pijače in mineralna olja.
(-1) Even though it is now thirteen years since the period referred to in Article 14 of the EC Treaty expired, the aim stated in that Article has still not been attained in the case of tobacco, alcoholic beverages and mineral oils.
Treba je začeti z novimi prizadevanji za olajšanje prostega pretoka trošarinskih proizvodov in ustanovitev notranjega trga na tem področju.
Further efforts should be made in order to facilitate the free movement of products subject to excise duty and to establish an internal market in those products.
Želimo poudariti, da je cilj te direktive skladen z željo po popolni uskladitvi trošarin.
We wish to point out that the purpose of the Directive under consideration is to help bring about full harmonisation of excise duties.
(2) Čeprav številke za gibanja izdelkov, za katere je bil plačan davek, v Skupnosti ostajajo nizke, se od takrat vedno več trgovcev in fizičnih oseb trudi razlagati člene od 7 do 10 Direktive 92/12/EGS tako, da bi se upravičile trgovske dejavnosti, ki vključujejo plačilo trošarine v državi članici, v kateri so bili izdelki nabavljeni.
(2) Since then, however, although the figures for intra-Community movements of tax-paid products remain relatively low, more and more traders and private individuals are trying to interpret Articles 7 to 10 of Directive 92/12/EEC in such a way as to legitimise trade practices involving payment of excise duty in the Member State where the products are acquired.
Tudi povečanje obsega trgovinskih transakcij, opravljenih prek interneta, in odprava brezcarinskih prodaj osebam, ki potujejo v Skupnosti, je povzročilo večjo uporabo teh določb.
Also, the increase in the volume of commercial transactions conducted via the Internet and the abolition of duty-free sales to persons travelling within the Community have resulted in more use being made of these provisions.
Na osnovi zaključkov nadaljnje raziskave nacionalnih uprav in vključenih trgovcev, izvedene januarja 2002, je Komisija sestavila poročilo o uporabi členov od 7 do 10 Direktive 92/12/EGS.
On the basis of the conclusions of a further survey of the national administrations and traders involved, launched in January 2002, the Commission drew up a report on the application of Articles 7 to 10 of Directive 92/12/EEC.
(2) Čeprav številke za gibanja izdelkov, za katere je bil plačan davek, v Skupnosti ostajajo nizke, se od takrat vedno več trgovcev nagiba k razlaganju členov od 7 do 10 Direktive 92/12/EGS tako, da bi se upravičile trgovske dejavnosti, ki vključujejo plačilo trošarine v državi članici, v kateri so bili izdelki nabavljeni in vedno večje število fizičnih oseb kupuje izdelke v drugih državah članicah za osebno uporabo in zanje upravičeno plačujejo trošarine v državi članici nakupa .
(2) Since then, however, although the figures for intra-Community movements of tax-paid products remain relatively low, more and more traders have tended to interpret Articles 7 to 10 of Directive 92/12/EEC in such a way as to legitimise trade practices involving payment of excise duty in the Member State where the products are acquired , and a growing number of private individuals are buying products in another Member State for their personal use and legitimately paying excise duty for them in the Member State of purchase .
Za pojasnitev je pomembno v uvodni izjavi navesti, da je čezmejno nakupovanje izdelkov, ki so predmet plačila trošarine, hitro rastoč pojav in da je plačevanje trošarine v državi članici nakupa upravičeno, če je izdelek namenjen izključno osebni uporabi.
In the interests of clarification it is important to specify in the recital that the cross-border purchasing of products subject to excise duty is a rapidly-growing phenomenon, and that paying excise duty in the Member State of purchase is quite legitimate provided that the product is solely for personal use.
(6) Člen 7 določa različne okoliščine, v katerih se trošarinski proizvodi, ki so že sproščeni v porabo v eni državi članici in se zaradi komercialnih namenov nahajajo v drugi državi članici, a ne določi jasno osebe, ki v takih okoliščinah plača trošarino v namembni državi članici.
(6) Article 7 distinguishes different situations in which excisable products already released for circulation in one Member State are held for commercial purposes in another, but does not clearly identify the person from whom excise duty is due in the Member State of destination in each of these situations.