natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
L. ker je Komisija v presoji vpliva predstavila tri predvidene poteke (A, B in C), ki kažejo različne ravni zastavljenih ciljev ter predviden potek največjega tehnično izvedljivega zmanjšanja,
L. whereas the Commission has presented in its Impact Assessment (IA) three scenarios (A, B and C) reflecting different levels of ambition as well as a Maximum Technically Feasible Reduction scenario,
M. ker presoja vpliva kaže, da je večina evropskih državljanov naklonjena evropski politiki za izboljšanje kakovosti zraka s ciljem, ki približno dosega raven predvidenega poteka C, v strategiji pa je Komisija izbrala nižje zastavljeni cilj, ki bi ga lahko označili z A+,
M. whereas the IA shows that the majority of European citizens favour a European policy to improve air quality with an ambition level resembling scenario C; in the Strategy, however, the Commission has chosen a lower level of ambition, which can be qualified as A+,
N. ker so stroški zmanjšanja ravni onesnaževanja zraka v vseh predvidenih potekih manjši kot finančne koristi, ker nobeden od predvidenih potekov ne ogroža celotnega konkurenčnega položaja EU in ker visoko zastavljen predviden potek spodbuja ustvarjanje delovnih mest,
N. whereas the costs of reducing air pollution levels in all scenarios are lower than the financial benefits; whereas none of the scenarios undermine the EU's overall competitive position and whereas an ambitious scenario leads to job creation,
O. ker je Komisija izvedla temeljito presojo vpliva ob upoštevanju strategije boljše ureditve in trajnostnega razvoja, vendar obstaja resno pomanjkanje sistemskega pristopa v predlagani strategiji in s tem povezani Direktivi o kakovosti zraka, ker se na primer ne pričakuje nadaljnje zmanjšanje emisij CO 2 , kar nedvomno povzroči precenjevanje stroškov in podcenjevanje ugodnosti za strategijo o kakovosti zraka, ker bo nadaljnje zmanjšanje emisij po letu 2012 med drugim prispevalo k izboljšanju kakovosti zraka,
O. whereas the Commission's IA is thorough and takes both Better Regulation and the Sustainable Development Strategy into account; yet there is a serious lack of systems approach in the proposed Strategy and the related Air Quality Directive, since, for instance, no further CO 2 emission reductions are anticipated, which no doubt leads to an overestimation of costs and underestimation of benefits for the Air Pollution Strategy since continued emission reductions after 2012 will, as one of many effects, contribute to an improvement of air quality,
P. ker presoja vpliva kaže, da se optimalen predviden potek – pri katerem so mejni stroški enaki mejnim koristim – umešča med predvidena poteka B in C, ne glede na to, da monetarizacija škode v ekosistemih, materiali iz pridelkov in tudi nekateri škodljivi vplivi na zdravje niso vključeni v podatke o stroških,
P. whereas the IA shows that the optimal scenario - where marginal costs equal marginal benefits - is to be found between scenarios B and C, regardless of the fact that monetarisation of damage to ecosystems, crop materials as well as some adverse health effects are not included in the cost figures,
Q. ker je delovna skupina CAFE za PM (delce) navedla, da obstajajo tveganja za zdravje, povezana s PM2,5 pri koncentracijah pod 10 µg/m 3 , in da mejna vrednost ne sme presegati 20 µg/m 3 ,
Q. whereas the CAFE working group on PM (particulate matter) noted that there are health risks linked to PM 2.5 at concentrations below 10 µg/m 3 and that a limit value should not exceed 20 µg/m 3 ,
R. ker, kot je poudaril Inštitut za evropsko okoljsko politiko, vrednost PM2,5 25 µg/m 3 , kot jo je predlagala Komisija, ne pomeni strožjih zahtev v zvezi s PM za države članice, ampak z dovoljevanjem izjem prej zmanjšuje obveznosti,
R. whereas – as pointed out by IEEP - the PM2.5 value of 25 µg/m 3 as proposed by the Commission does not entail more stringent requirements for Member States on PM, but rather relaxes obligations by allowing exemptions,
S. ker izboljšanje kakovosti zraka prinaša koristi za družbo kot celoto, medtem ko stroške prevzamejo posebni sektorji, ker je zato pomembno, da se poiščejo načini za plačevanje teh stroškov, medtem ko uporaba načela „onesnaževalec plača“ povzroča nesprejemljive stroške za posebne sektorje,
S. whereas improvements in air quality benefit society as a whole, while the costs are incurred by specific sectors; whereas, for that reason, it is necessary to find ways of meeting those costs when application of the "polluter pays" principle leads to unacceptable costs for a specific sector,
T. ker morajo vsi sektorji prispevati k izboljšanju kakovosti zraka, s posebnim poudarkom na tistih sektorjih, ki do zdaj niso dovolj prispevali k ohranjanju čistega zraka,
T. whereas all sectors must contribute to improvements in air quality, with particular emphasis on those sectors which hitherto have made only an inadequate contribution to keeping the air clean,
U. ker določbe notranjega trga spodbujajo doseganje okoljskih ciljev in mejnih vrednosti v EU, če se cilji v različnih državah članicah enako izvajajo,
U. whereas internal market provisions stimulate the achievement of environmental targets and limit values in the EU, as long as targets are equally implemented in the various Member States,
V. ker mnoge države članice ne izpolnjujejo mejnih vrednosti v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo o kakovosti zraka – večina težav se pojavlja na Nizozemskem, v Belgiji, Nemčiji, severni Italiji, na Poljskem in v velikih mestih, ker so do zdaj sprejeti ukrepi, ki so usmerjeni v vire onesnaženja, nezadostni za doseganje teh mejnih vrednosti,
V. whereas many Member States do not meet the limit values under current air quality legislation - most problems occur in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, northern Italy, Poland and in large cities; whereas the measures adopted so far that are directed at the sources of pollution are insufficient to achieve the limit values,
X. ker vzrok za neizpolnjevanje mejnih vrednosti ni vedno pomanjkanje ukrepov v državah članicah, ampak ga včasih povzroči tudi pomanjkanje ustreznih ukrepov Skupnosti,
X. whereas failures to comply with limit values are not always due to a lack of measures taken by the Member State but are sometimes also caused by a lack of adequate Community measures,
Y. ker je potrebna strategija, ki vključuje visoko zastavljene cilje, izražene z ambiciozno zakonodajo o kakovosti zraka, skupaj z ukrepi, ki se osredotočajo na vire onesnaženja, da se omogoči državam članicam, da izpolnjujejo standarde kakovosti zraka, hkrati pa daje dodaten čas državam članicam, ki so sprejele vse ustrezne ukrepe, ampak imajo še vedno težave pri izpolnjevanju mejnih vrednosti,
Y. whereas a strategy is needed that contains ambitious targets that are translated into ambitious air quality legislation, accompanied by measures focusing on the sources of pollution, to enable Member States to meet air quality standards, while giving more time to Member States that have taken all appropriate measures but still face problems in meeting limit values,
Z. ker je treba za zagotovitev uresničitve ciljev v zvezi z zdravjem in okoljem Direktivo o nacionalnih zgornjih mejah emisij dopolniti z različnimi ukrepi za zmanjšanje emisij na lokalni, nacionalni in mednarodni ravni ter na ravni Skupnosti,
Z. whereas in order to ensure the attainment of health and environmental objectives, the National Emission Ceilings Directive should be complemented by a mix of emission reduction measures at local, national, Community and international levels,
1. pozdravlja tematsko strategijo Komisije o onesnaževanju zraka, ki poudarja, da je onesnaževanje zraka resen problem za zdravje in okolje;
Welcomes the Commission's thematic strategy on air pollution, which emphasises the fact that air pollution is a serious health and environmental problem;
3. z obžalovanjem ugotavlja, da strategija ne vključuje nobene pravne zahteve za zmanjšanje emisij delcev, kot je priporočila Evropska agencija za okolje, ampak se omejuje le na predloge okvirnih ciljev;
Notes with regret that the strategy does not include any legal requirement to reduce particulate emissions, as recommended by the European Environment Agency, but simply confines itself to suggesting indicative targets;
veljavna zakonodaja za leto 2020
2020 Current Legislation
cilji EP in ustrezen predviden potek za leto 2020
2020 EP targets and corresponding scenario
dodatno 7,1 milijarde EUR
EUR 7 100 million extra
dodatno +/- 11 milijard EUR
+/- EUR 11 000 million extra
8. je prepričan, da je predlagano zmanjšanje onesnaževanja mogoče doseči le, če EU okrepi zakonodajo o emisijah, in poziva k sprejetju visoko zastavljenih mejnih vrednosti, ki so zavezujoče v večjem obsegu;
Is convinced that the proposed pollution reductions can only be achieved if the EU strengthens its emission legislation and calls for the adoption of ambitious limit values that are binding to a larger extent;
Sektorski ukrepi
Sector-based measures
– za določitev emisijskih standardov NOx za ladje, ki uporabljajo pristanišča v EU;
- to establish NOx emission standards for ships using EU ports;
– za imenovanje Sredozemskega morja in severovzhodnega Atlantika za območji nadzora nad emisijami žvepla (SECA) v okviru Konvencije MARPOL;
- to designate the Mediterranean Sea and the North-East Atlantic as Sulphur Emission Control areas (SECAs) under the MARPOL Convention;
– za zmanjšanje največje dovoljene vsebnosti žvepla v ladijskih gorivih, ki se uporabljajo na območjih SECA, in v potniških ladjah z 1,5 % na 0,5 %;
- to lower the maximum allowed sulphur content in marine fuels used in SECAs and by passenger vessels from 1.5% to 0.5%;
– za uvedbo finančnih instrumentov, kot so davki ali dajatve na emisije SO 2 in NOx iz ladij;
- to introduce financial instruments such as taxes or charges on SO 2 and NOx emissions from ships;
– za spodbuditev uvedbe različnih pristaniških dajatev in dajatev za plovne poti, ki bodo dajale prednost plovilom z majhnimi emisijami SO 2 in NOx;
- to encourage the introduction of differentiated port and fairway charges favouring vessels with low emissions of SO 2 and NOx;
– za spodbuditev, da ladje, medtem ko so zasidrane v pristaniščih, uporabljajo elektriko s kopnega;
- to encourage the use of shore-side electricity by ships when in ports;
– Direktive EU o kakovosti ladijskih goriv;
- for an EU directive on the quality of marine fuels;
nadalje poziva Komisijo, da predlaga usklajeno delovanje, da se zagotovijo enotni pogoji delovanja, in da vztraja pri delovanju v okviru Mednarodne pomorske organizacije (IMO); je prepričan, da je potrebna večja uravnoteženost med stroški zmanjševanja emisij iz ladij in emisij s kopnega;
further calls upon the Commission to propose coordinated action to ensure a level playing field and to insist on action within the IMO; is convinced that a better balance between the costs of reducing emissions from ships and land-based emissions is needed;
17. ugotavlja, da so stroški za zmanjšanje emisij NH3 verjetno precenjeni, napovedi osnutka reforme SKP Evropske agencije za okolje na primer predvidevajo manj glav živine kot izhodiščne napovedi programa CAFE, kar bi natančneje pomenilo tudi nižje stroške, kot so bili predvideni, za uresničitev zmanjšanja emisij amoniaka;
Notes that as a general feature the costs of NH3 emission reductions seem to be overestimated, for example the draft CAP reform projections of the European Environment Agency foresee lower livestock numbers than the CAFE baseline projections, which if more accurate, would also mean lower than projected costs for achieving ammonia emissions reductions;
19. poziva Komisijo, da čim prej predlaga ukrepe za zmanjšanje emisij iz industrijskih virov, vključno z revizijo Direktive IPPC, ki mora bolj učinkovito nagraditi inovacije in vključiti manjše kurilne naprave z močjo pod 50 MWh;
Calls on the Commission to propose as soon as possible measures to reduce emissions from industrial sources, including a revision of the IPPC Directive, which should reward innovation more effectively and include small-scale combustion installations below 50MWh;
26. poziva Komisijo, da leta 2012 pregleda napredek pri doseganju ciljev strategije in da v različnih sektorjih oceni možnost nadaljnjega stroškovno učinkovitega zmanjšanja;
Calls on the Commission to review in 2012 the progress made in attaining the objectives of the Strategy and to assess the potential in different sectors for further cost-effective reductions;
Čisti zrak je ključen za zdravje ljudi.
Clean air is vital to human health.
Škoda, ki jo onesnaževanje zraka povzroča zdravju, je ogromna.
The damage caused to health by air pollution is considerable.
V Evropi je zaradi onesnaževanja zraka izgubljenih 3,6 milijona let življenja ali, z drugimi besedami, 360 000 ljudi umre 10 let prezgodaj.
In Europe 3.6 million life years are lost as a result of air pollution, or in other words 360 000 people die 10 years prematurely.
Razen umiranja ljudi onesnažen zrak povzroča tudi veliko trpljenja zaradi bolezni ali slabšega delovanja pljuč.
In addition to people dying, polluted air also causes a great deal of suffering through illness or impaired lung function.
Zdravstveni problemi ne prizadenejo vseh na enak način; najbolj so prizadeti otroci, starejši ljudje, ljudje, ki že imajo težave s pljuči, in ljudje, ki živijo v mestih ali blizu glavnih cest.
The health problems do not affect everyone in the same way; children, elderly people, people already suffering from a lung disorder and people living in urban areas or near major roads are the worst affected.
Onesnaževanje zraka škoduje tudi naravnemu okolju.
The natural environment is also damaged by air pollution.
Ocenjuje se, da je 55% evropskih ekosistemov prizadetih zaradi onesnaženega zraka.
It is estimated that 55% of European ecosystems are affected by polluted air.
Posledice so zakisljevanje gozdov, evtrofikacija in izguba biološke raznovrstnosti.
Acidification of forests, eutrophication and loss of biodiversity are the consequences.
Probleme povzročajo zlasti dušikovi oksidi, žveplov dioksid, amoniak in tudi ozon.
The problems are caused primarily by nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, ammonia and also ozone.
Onesnaževanje zraka škoduje tudi zgradbam.
Buildings are also damaged by air pollution.
Onesnaževanje zraka je čezmejen problem.
Air pollution is a cross‑border problem.
Onesnaževala lahko potujejo sto ali celo več tisoč kilometrov.
Pollutants can travel hundreds and even thousands of kilometres.
Država, kot je Združeno kraljestvo, povzroča znatne ravni emisij, sama pa je relativno malo prizadeta zaradi njih.
A country like the United Kingdom produces considerable levels of emissions, but is itself relatively little affected by them.
Zaradi pogostih zahodnih vetrov pa te emisije močno prizadenejo druge države članice.
Frequent westerly winds mean, however, that other Member States are significantly affected by such emissions.
Na Nizozemsko prihajajo velike količine onesnaženega zraka iz Belgije, Nemčije in Združenega kraljestva, vendar so količine onesnaženega zraka, ki iz nje odhajajo, trikrat večje od tistih, ki vanjo prihajajo iz drugih držav.
The Netherlands imports large amounts of polluted air from Belgium, Germany and the United Kingdom, but exports three times as much as it imports.
V skandinavske države prihajajo relativno velike količine onesnaženega zraka iz drugih držav.
Scandinavian countries import relatively large amounts of polluted air.
Obstoječa politika
Existing policy
Kakovost zraka se je v zadnjih 30 letih že znatno izboljšala, delno zaradi zakonodaje EU.
Thanks in part to EU legislation, air quality has already improved significantly in the past 30 years.
Določeni so bili standardi kakovosti zraka, kar je povzročilo veliko zmanjšanje emisij mnogih onesnaževal.
Air quality standards have been set, resulting in a sharp fall in emissions of many pollutants.
Veljajo evropske direktive, ki obravnavajo vire emisij, na primer velike kurilne naprave, avtomobile in težka tovorna vozila.
European directives are in force which tackle emissions at source, for example large combustion plants, cars and HGVs.
Vseeno standardi kakovosti niso bili absolutno izpolnjeni in zlasti strnjena mestna območja so zelo problematična.
However, compliance with air quality standards has not been an unqualified success, and in particular there are still considerable problems around urban conurbations.
Analiza Evropske agencije za okolje kaže, da je več kot 50% ljudi, ki živijo v evropskih mestih, izpostavljeno koncentracijam, ki presegajo dnevne mejne vrednosti več kot 35-krat na leto (State and Outlook 2005, str.
An analysis by the European Environment Agency indicates that more than 50% of people living in European cities are exposed to concentrations that exceed daily limit values more than 35 times a year (State and Outlook 2005, p.
In to še ni vse: na žalost tudi sedanji predpisi ne zadostujejo za rešitev problema in uresničevanje ciljev iz šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa, ki želi doseči „ ravni kakovosti zraka, ki nimajo večjih negativnih vplivov na zdravje ljudi in okolje ter ne ogrožajo zdravja ljudi in okolja “.
And there is more bad news: unfortunately even the current rules do not go far enough to solve the problem and to achieve the objective set out in the Sixth Environmental Action Programme (EAP) of attaining ' levels of air quality that do not give rise to significant negative impacts on, and risks to human health and the environment'.
Zato je potrebna prepričljiva strategija: strategija, ki zdravje postavlja na prvo mesto ter tudi zagotavlja rešitve problema pomanjkljivosti sedanje politike in problema skladnosti z zakonodajo.
A convincing strategy is therefore needed: a strategy which puts health first and which also provides answers to the problem of the shortcomings in current policy and problems with compliance with legislation.
Tematska strategija
The thematic strategy
Tematska strategija temelji na obsežni presoji vpliva.
The thematic strategy is based on an extensive Impact Assessment.
Izhodišče za strategijo so bili trije predvideni poteki (A, B in C) in največje tehnično izvedljivo zmanjšanje (MTFR).
The starting point for the strategy was three scenarios (A, B and C) and a Maximum Technically Feasible Reduction (MTFR).
V zvezi s presojo vpliva se lahko pripomni naslednje:
The following remarks may be made with regard to the Impact Assessment:
*Vsi predvideni poteki, vključno z MTFR, so stroškovno učinkoviti, tj. koristi v smislu izboljšanja zdravja so večje od stroškov.
*All of the scenarios, including the MTFR, are cost-effective, i.e. the benefits in terms of health gains are greater than the costs.
*Vsi predvideni poteki so bolj ali manj nevtralni v smislu njihovega vpliva na zaposlovanje in konkurenčnost.
*All of the scenarios are more or less neutral in terms of their impact on employment and competitiveness.
Vseeno pa je treba navesti, da predvideni potek C napoveduje rast zaposlovanja v vseh sektorjih, razen v kmetijskem.
However, it should be noted that in the case of scenario C there would be growth in employment in all sectors, except in the agricultural sector.
Znatno število izgub delovnih mest v kmetijskem sektorju (73 000) bi se večinoma nadomestilo s povečanjem v drugih sektorjih.
The considerable number of job losses in the agricultural sector (73 000) would be largely offset by increases in other sectors.
*Stroški izvajanja različnih predvidenih potekov so, po nekaterih virih, podcenjeni.
*The costs of implementing the various scenarios are, according to some, under‑estimated.
Zlasti avtomobilska industrija vztraja, da bi dejansko povzročili večje stroške.
In particular, the car industry maintains that it would in fact incur higher costs.
Na drugi strani se lahko stroški zmanjševanja emisij s kopnega znižajo, če tudi sektor ladijskega prevoza zmanjša emisije (ni vključeno v izračun stroškov).
On the other hand, the costs of reductions in land‑based emissions may fall if the shipping sector also reduces its emissions (not included in the calculation of costs).
Razen tega se lahko stroški še naprej znižujejo, če ukrepi, ki jih bo treba izvajati za izpolnjevanje obveznosti, ki sledijo Kjotu (ki jih je treba šele določiti), seveda še niso bili upoštevani.
In addition, the costs may fall further given that the measures that will have to be implemented to comply with the post-Kyoto obligations (which have yet to be laid down) have, of course, not yet been taken into account.
*Ocene koristi so nizke, ker je v izračunih upoštevano le zdravje, in razen tega je vrednost, pripisana človeškemu življenju, veliko manjša, kot v izračunih, uporabljenih v ZDA.
*The estimates of the benefits are on the low side, as only health is taken into account in the calculations and, moreover, the value assigned to a human life is much lower than in calculations used in the US.
Koristi za okolje in koristi v smislu zmanjšanja škode za kmetijske pridelke (ocenjene na 0,3 milijarde EUR na leto) in zmanjšanja škode na zgradbah v izračunih niso upoštevane.
The benefits to the environment and benefits in terms of reduced damage to agricultural crops (estimated at EUR 0.3 billion a year) and reduced damage to buildings are not taken into account in the calculations.
Razmerje med stroški in koristmi je zato v resnici znatno ugodnejše.
The ratio between costs and benefits is therefore in reality considerably more favourable.
*Mejni stroški in mejne koristi so seveda pomembni.
*Marginal costs and marginal benefits are, of course, important.
Presoja vpliva ocenjuje, da je glede na nizko oceno koristi za zdravje optimalni predvideni potek nekje med B in C.
The Impact Assessment calculates the optimal scenario to lie somewhere between B and C, based on what is a low estimate of the health benefits.
*Inštitut za evropsko okoljsko politiko je ocenil presojo vpliva in ugotovil, da so številke in ocene zanesljive.
*The IEEP has evaluated the Impact Assessment and concluded that the figures and estimates are reliable.
Koristi znašajo 42 milijard EUR.
The benefits amount to EUR 42 billion.
Izbrani predvideni potek ne bi povzročil zmanjšanja zaposlovanja in ne bi imel negativnega vpliva na konkurenčni položaj Evrope v svetu.
The scenario chosen would entail no reduction in employment and would have no negative impact on Europe's competitive position within the world.
Po posvetovanju o presoji vpliva in po obravnavanju priporočil zdravstvenih strokovnjakov poročevalka meni, da mora biti raven izbranih zastavljenih ciljev višja.
Following consultations on the Impact Assessment and after hearing recommendations from health experts, your rapporteur takes the view that the level of ambition opted for should be higher.
Tematska strategija o onesnaževanju zraka se preveč ozko osredotoča na stroške ter premalo na koristi za zdravje in priložnosti, ki bi jih lahko ponudil bolj ambiciozen pristop.
The thematic strategy on air pollution focuses too narrowly on costs and too little on the health benefits and the opportunities which a more ambitious approach could offer.
V skladu z Lizbonsko strategijo in prizadevanjem EU za najbolj konkurenčno gospodarstvo na svetu, morajo biti veljavni standardi kakovosti zraka vsaj enakovredni tistim v ZDA.
In the light of the Lisbon strategy and the EU's aspiration to be the most competitive economy in the world, the air quality standards applied should be at least equivalent to those in the US.
Za koncentracije drobnih delcev (PM 2,5 ) v ZDA velja mejna vrednost 15 mg, čeprav je treba omeniti, da standard v ZDA temelji na rezultatih meritev, opravljenih v obdobju treh let, in da meritve niso vedno osredotočene na dejanska krizna področja.
For concentrations of fine particles (PM 2.5 ) a limit of 15 mg applies in the US, although it should be noted that the standard in the US is based on the results of measurements taken over a three‑year period and that measurements are not always focused on the real hot spots.
Če se izbere bolj ambiciozen predviden potek in se EU jasno odloči v korist zdravja, bo to prineslo mnogo možnosti za odpiranje novih delovnih mest, kot to prikazuje presoja vpliva.
If a more ambitious scenario is chosen and the EU makes a clear choice in favour of health, there will be many opportunities for creating new jobs, as is shown by the Impact Assessment.