natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Preučiti se morajo izvedljivost in možni načini za vključitev Bolgarije, Hrvaške, Romunije in Turčije v izmenjavo podatkov v zvezi s terorističnimi kaznivimi dejanji za razširitev obsega sodelovanja in pripravo držav kandidatk na naloge, ki jih bodo prevzele kot države članice.
The feasibility and possible ways of including Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania and Turkey in the exchange of information related to terrorist offences should be examined in order to widen the scope of cooperation and prepare the candidate States for their tasks as Member States.
Študija mora tudi razširiti svoj geografski obseg, da bi pokrili pripravljenost in zmogljivosti evropskih sosednjih držav za sodelovanje v tem obveščevalnem postopku.
The study should also extend its geographical scope in order to cover the readiness and capabilities of the European neighbouring countries to cooperate in this information process.
Predlog sklepa Sveta o izmenjavi podatkov in sodelovanju v zvezi s terorističnimi kaznivimi dejanji
Proposal for a Council decision on the exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Carlos Carnero González, Alexandra Dobolyi, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Gál, Jaromír Kohlícek, Pasqualina Napoletano, Doris Pack, Athanasios Pafilis, Rihards Pīks, Aloyzas Sakalas, Anders Samuelsen, Inger Segelström, Csaba Sándor Tabajdi
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Carlos Carnero González, Alexandra Dobolyi, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Gál, Jaromír Kohlíček, Pasqualina Napoletano, Doris Pack, Athanasios Pafilis, Rihards Pīks, Aloyzas Sakalas, Anders Samuelsen, Inger Segelström, Csaba Sándor Tabajdi
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE
OPINIONOF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS
zaOdbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve
for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o izmenjavi informacij in sodelovanju na področju kaznivih dejanj terorizma
on the proposal for a Council decision on the exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences
Boj proti terorizmu mora biti prednostni cilj Unije, ki je dolžna storiti vse, kar je v njeni moči, da zagotovi ukrepe, potrebne za varovanje naših najvišjih vrednot: življenj in svobode naših državljanov.
The fight against terrorism has to be a priority objective for the Union, which, sparing no efforts, must be able to call upon the means of action needed to safeguard our most prized assets: the lives and freedom of our citizens.
Grozljivi napadi 11. septembra so še povečali potrebo po tem, da vojna proti terorizmu postane prednostna naloga Unije.
The horrifying attacks on 11 September highlighted the need for the Union to treat the war on terrorism as a priority.
Žal je morala Španija doživeti krvavo jutro 11. marca 2004.
Sadly, Spain had to endure the blood-soaked morning of 11 March 2004.
Nasilje je spet udarilo, naključno in kruto, tokrat na evropskih tleh, v državi, ki jo že desetletja zastrupljajo neusmiljeni, podli morilci.
Terror struck again with random cruelty, this time on European soil, in a country which has been plagued for decades by callous, despicable murderers.
11-M je spremenil zgodovino Evrope in s tem zgodovino Evropske unije.
11-M changed the history of Europe, and with it the history of the European Union.
Teroristični napadi so bili usmerjeni proti našemu skupnemu projektu in našemu sistemu mirnega sobivanja, demokracije in svobode: skratka, prav proti načinu življenja, ki je Evropejcem in Evropejkam tako blizu.
The terrorist attacks targeted our common project and our system of peaceful coexistence, democracy, and freedom: in short, the very way of life that Europeans enjoy.
Vprašanju izbire ustreznega orožja za boj proti terorizmu se je bilo treba približati z drugega zornega kota, saj terorizma ne bi smeli imeti za enovit pojav.
The question of the particular weapons with which to fight terrorism needed to be approached from a new angle, for terrorism should not be regarded as a monolithic phenomenon.
Treba je sklepati takole: čeprav je vsak terorizem enako gnusen, obstajajo različni tipi, ki se med seboj razlikujejo glede na uporabljena sredstva in strategije, storilce ali skupine storilcev ter glede na posamezne grozljive posledice napadov.
The inference to be drawn is that, although they are all equally execrable, there are distinct types of terrorism, which vary according to the means used, the specific strategies employed, the perpetrators or groups of perpetrators, and the individual horrific consequences of the attacks.
Zaradi tega moramo znati identificirati cilje, s katerimi se želimo spopasti, in najti ustrezne načine boja proti prav vsakemu od njih ter tako tudi proti vsakemu tipu terorizma posebej.
Consequently, we need to be able to pinpoint the targets that we wish to deal with and to devise appropriate ways of fighting each and every one of them and hence each and every type of terrorism.
Boj torej ne sme biti zasnovan samo na protinapadu; jasno je, da je najboljši način boja proti različnim tipom terorizma njihovo preprečevanje.
The fight must not, therefore, be based solely on steps taken in reaction; it is clear that the best way to combat the different types of terrorism is to prevent them.
Hitra dvostranska izmenjava informacij med za to usposobljenimi službami držav članic in možnost izročanja pomembnejših informacij Europolu in/ali Eurojustu na rutinski podlagi lahko veliko pripomoreta k preprečevanju terorističnih napadov.
A rapid bilateral exchange of information between the Member States’ specialised services and the possibility of passing on more important information to Europol and/or Eurojust, as a matter of routine, could do much to forestall terrorist attacks.
Da bi bila izmenjava informacij učinkovita, se mora okrepiti medsebojno zaupanje med policijami držav članic, uvesti pa je treba tudi skupne interpretacijske kriterije, ki bi zagotovili, da si Europol in države članice razlagajo podatke na enak način.
However, to make the exchange of information effective, mutual trust needs to be strengthened between the Member States’ police services, and common interpretation criteria laid down to ensure that Europol and the Member States interpret data in the same way.
Ob upoštevanju predlaganega evropskega registra obtožb se zdi presenetljivo, da ga sklep Sveta ne predpisuje.
As regards the proposed European register of convictions, the Council decision surprisingly fails to provide for it.
Mislimo, da bi morali biti bolj ambiciozni kot Komisija in ne samo priporočiti, naj se vzpostavi register obsodb in izločitev na evropski ravni.
We feel that we have to be more ambitious than the Commission and not merely recommend that a register of convictions and disqualifications be compiled at European level.
Če želimo resnično preprečiti terorizem, ni dovolj zgolj upati, da bi bil tak register vzpostavljen: nasprotno, Komisijo in Svet moramo izrecno opomniti, naj si bolj prizadevata za njegovo takojšnjo vzpostavitev, posebej če upoštevamo, da bi nam bil namen registra v pomoč na poti k cilju zmage nad terorizmom, zagotavljanja skupnega področja svobode, varnosti, pravice in zaščite svobode, demokracije ter predvsem življenj naših državljanov.
If we really want to prevent terrorism, it is not enough simply to hope that such a register might be introduced: on the contrary, we must urge the Commission and Council to focus their efforts so that the register can indeed be set up immediately, bearing in mind especially that the purpose which it would serve would help us to attain our goal of defeating terrorism, safeguarding the common area of freedom, security, and justice, and protecting freedom, democracy, and, above all, the lives of our citizens.
Nobena težava ne sme stati na poti do učinkovite zaščite svobode in pravice do življenja; pri nobeni oviri se ne smemo zamuditi, če želimo doseči naš skupni cilj, ne glede na to, kako trdo bi morala delati Petindvajseterica, da preseže to oviro.
No difficulty must stand in the way of effective protection of freedom and the right to life; no obstacle, no matter how hard the Twenty-Five might need to work in order to surmount it, must delay us in achieving our common goal.
Zaradi vseh zgoraj navedenih razlogov mislimo, da je predlog za sklep smotrn, saj bi pospešil napredek pri doseganju prednostnega cilja preprečevanja terorizma, boja proti terorizmu ter njegovega izkoreninjenja.
For all these reasons, we consider the proposal for a decision to be sound, since it will assist progress towards the priority objective of preventing, combating, and eradicating terrorism.
Priporočamo pa, da Svet uveljavi potrebne ukrepe, s pomočjo katerih bo vzpostavljen evropski register obsodb.
However, we recommend that the Council put forward the measures to be taken with a view to setting up the European register of convictions.
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da potrdi predlog za sklep.
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to endorse the proposal for a decision.
Predlog za sklep Sveta o izmenjavi informacij in sodelovanju na področju kaznivih dejanj terorizma
Proposal for a Council decision on the exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences
Predlog sklepa Sveta o izmenjavi podatkov in sodelovanju v zvezi s terorističnimi dejanji
Proposal for a Council decision on the exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences
Pravna podlaga
Article 39, para.
Datum predložitve– A6
Date tabled – A[ 6 ]
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Evropskemu svetu in Svetu o varovanju kritične infrastrukture v okviru boja proti terorizmu
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the European Council and to the Council on the protection of critical infrastructures in the framework of the fight against terrorism
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA EVROPSKEMU SVETU IN SVETU 3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL AND TO THE COUNCIL 3
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA B6-0085/2005................................................................................9
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION B6-0085/2005.....................................................9
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA EVROPSKEMU SVETU IN SVETU
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL AND TO THE COUNCIL
o varovanju kriticne infrastrukture v okviru boja proti terorizmu
on the protection of critical infrastructures in the framework of the fight against terrorism
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Stavrosa Lambrinidisa Svetu v imenu skupine PSE o varovanju kritične infrastrukture v okviru boja proti terorizmu ( B6-0085/2005 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Stavros Lambrinidis on behalf of the PSE Group on protection of critical infrastructures in the framework of the fight against terrorism ( B6-0085/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju Ustavne pogodbe in še zlasti členov III-284 o civilni zaščiti in I-43, ki določa, da „Unija in njene države članice delujejo skupaj v duhu solidarnosti, če je kakšna država članica žrtev terorističnega napada, naravne nesreče ali nesreče, ki jo je povzročil človek.
– having regard to the Constitutional Treaty, and in particular to Articles III-284 on civil protection and I-43, which provides that "The Union and its Member States shall act jointly in a spirit of solidarity if a Member State is the object of a terrorist attack or the victim of a natural or man-made disaster,"
– ob upoštevanju Deklaracije o solidarnosti proti terorizmu, ki so jo 25. marca 2004 sprejeli voditelji držav in vlad,
– having regard to the Declaration on solidarity against terrorism adopted by the Heads of State and Government on 25 of March 2004,
– ob upoštevanju „Haaškega programa“
– having regard to the "Hague Programme"
Ta režim naj zajema vsaj naslednje postavke: dodatno oceno zmogljivosti držav članic, kopičenje zalog, usposabljanje, skupne vaje in operativne načrte za civilno krizno upravljanje“,
This arrangement should at least address the following issues: further assessment of Member States’ capabilities, stockpiling, training, joint exercises and operational plans for civil crisis management’,"
– ob upoštevanju sporočil Komisije:
– having regard to the Commission communications:
(a) Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o pospeševanju zmogljivosti Evropske unije na področju civilne zaščite ( KOM(2004)0200 ), ki vrednoti doslej dosežene rezultate, šibke točke in morebitne izboljšave zmogljivosti Evropske unije na področju civilne zaščite, še zlasti kot prvi instrument posredovanja v krizah, ki temelji na prostovoljni podlagi,
(a) to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Reinforcing the civil protection capacity of the European Union ( COM(2004)0200 ), which evaluates the results so far achieved with, the weaknesses of, and possible improvements to, the European Union's civil protection capacity, notably as a first instrument on crisis intervention, founded on a voluntary basis,
(b) Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o preprečevanju, pripravljenosti in odzivu na teroristične napade ( KOM(2004)0698 ), ki poudarja potrebo po celostnem pristopu Skupnosti, ki bi bil med drugim osredotočen na ustrezno sporazumevanje oblasti z javnostjo v primeru krize, omenja vlogo EUROPOLA pri vzpostavljanju pravnega mehanizma za alarm za obravnavanje terorizma in o ustanovitvi Evropskega programa za varovanje kritične infrastrukture (EPCIP), o raziskavah na področju varnosti ter o strukturiranem načinu vključevanja ustreznih delov zasebnega sektorja,
(b) to the Council and the European Parliament on Prevention, preparedness and response to terrorist attacks ( COM(2004)0698 ), which emphasises the need for an integrated Community approach that should, inter alia, focus on proper communication of authorities with the public in case of a crisis, on the role of EUROPOL in the creation of a law enforcement alert mechanism to deal with terrorism and the establishment of a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP), on security research, and on engaging in a structured manner the relevant parts of the private sector,
(c) Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o pripravljenosti in upravljanju s posledicami v boju proti terorizmu ( KOM(2004)0701 ), ki predlaga združitev sistemov za izredne primere, ki jih upravlja Komisija, v varen splošni sistem za hitro opozarjanje (ARGUS), ki je povezan z osrednjim kriznim središčem, kar bi združilo predstavnike vseh ustreznih služb Komisije in predstavljalo trajno povezavo med državami članicami in evropskimi ustanovami,
(c) to the Council and the European Parliament on Preparedness and consequence management in the fight against terrorism ( COM(2004)0701 ), which proposes to consolidate the emergency systems managed by the Commission in a secure general rapid alert system (ARGUS) linked to a Central Crisis Centre that would bring together representatives of all relevant Commission Services and would provide a permanent link between the Member States and the European Institutions,
(d) Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o varovanju kritične infrastrukture v boju proti terorizmu ( KOM(2004)0702 ), ki predlaga EPCIP, ki se vzpostavi v sodelovanju z državami članicami in ustreznimi deli zasebnega sektorja, in ki prepoznava morebitne pomanjkljivosti in potrebne korektivne ukrepe (pravne ali drugačne),
(d) to the Council and the European Parliament on Critical Infrastructure Protection in the fight against terrorism ( COM(2004)0702 ), which proposes an EPCIP to be established in cooperation with the Member States and the relevant parts of the private sector and which will identify the possible shortcomings and the corrective measures (legal or of other kinds) to be taken,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2003 o učinkih poletnega vročinskega vala
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2003 on the effects of the summer heat wave
382. , v kateri poziva k ustanovitvi evropske sile za civilno zaščito,
382. , in which it called for a European Civil Protection Force to be created,
– ob upoštevanju ustrezne pravne podlage Pogodb, ki pooblašča Skupnost in Unijo, da opredelita in izvajata politiko za podpiranje dejavnosti držav članic za varovanje zdravja, varnost in zaščito evropskih državljanov,
– having regard to the relevant legal bases in the Treaties which empower the Community and the Union to define and implement policies for supporting Member State action in protecting the health, security and safety of European citizens,
– ob upoštevanju pravil 114(3) in 94 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 114(3) and Rule 94 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0161/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0161/2005 ),
A. se zaveda, da je treba evropske državljane še naprej varovati pred tveganji, povezanimi s terorističnimi napadi (kot so jedrski, radiološki, kemični in biološki napadi na javnih mestih itd.), in tudi z naravnimi nesrečami (kot so potresi, poplave, požari, gozdni požari), s tehnološkimi nesrečami (kot je nesreča v Seversu, nesreče na morju, nesreče pri prevozu), kot tudi z zdravjem in drugimi krizami (npr. s pandemijami) v okviru celostne evropske strategije, glede na to, da ne le, da imajo taki dogodki večje čezmejne posledice na evropski ravni, ampak morajo države članice pokazati solidarnost druga z drugo, in da mora obstajati dosleden in medoperabilen sistem odziva,
A. conscious of the continuing need of Europe’s citizens to be protected against the risks linked with terrorist attacks (such as nuclear, radiological, chemical and biological, attacks in public spaces, etc.) but also with natural disasters (such as earthquakes, floods, fires, forest fires), with technological disasters (such as Seveso, maritime disasters, transport accidents), as well as with health and other crises (e.g., pandemics), in the context of an integrated European strategy, given that such events not only often have major cross-border consequences at a European level, but also make it necessary for the Member States to demonstrate solidarity with one another and for there to be in place a consistent and interoperable system of response,
B. ugotavlja, da mora biti učinkovita strategija osredotočena na pripravljenost (oceno tveganja in ogroženosti kritične infrastrukture, poostrene varnostne ukrepe, spodbujanje skupnih standardov varnosti ter izmenjavo strokovnega znanja, spodbujanje usklajevanja in sodelovanja po vsej EU) ter upravljanje posledic napadov in nesreč (izmenjavo znanja in izkušenj, predvidevanje poteka ter vaj za usposabljanje in vzpostavitev primernega upravljanja kriznih razmer, mehanizme hitrega obveščanja in civilne zaščite),
B. noting that an effective strategy should focus both on preparedness (risk and threat assessments on critical infrastructure, heightened security measures, promoting common security standards and exchange of expertise, promoting EU-wide coordination and cooperation) and on managing the consequences of attacks and disasters (exchange of know-how and experience, scenario-building and training exercises and establishment of appropriate crisis-management, rapid-alert and civil-protection mechanisms),
C. ker lahko še zlasti pri terorističnih napadih, ko preprečevanje in svarilo ne uspeta, samo dobro organiziran in učinkovit sistem odziva zagotovi hiter povratek normalnih razmer; samo z izboljšanjem strokovnega znanja, tesnega sodelovanja, združevanja virov, zagotavljanja ocene tveganja, obveščanja, usposabljanja, sporazumevanja, predhodnih analiz in analiz po napadu, zagotavljanja pravočasnega povratka v normalno stanje, z zvišanjem financiranja in zagotavljanjem nujne pomoči za varovanje žrtev so lahko države članice in EU bolje pripravljene za zaščito državljanov, ko pride do katastrofe znotraj in zunaj Unije, z dejanskimi ali neizbežnimi posledicami za državljane EU,
C. convinced that, especially in the case of terrorism, when prevention and deterrence are undermined and attacks occur, only a well-organised and effective response system can guarantee an expeditious return to normality; only by increasing specialised skills, working closely together, pooling resources, guaranteeing risk assessment, information, training, communications, pre-emptive and post-disaster analysis, ensuring a prompt restoration to normality and, finally, by increasing funding and shielding victims with the necessary aid, can the Member States and the EU be better prepared to protect citizens when a disaster strikes within and outside the Union, with real or imminent consequences for EU citizens,
D. ugotavlja, da postaja kritična infrastruktura v EU medsebojno povezana in soodvisna, zaradi česar je veliko bolj ranljiva zaradi prekinitev in uničenja,
D. noting that critical infrastructure in the EU is becoming highly interconnected and interdependent, making it more vulnerable to disruption or destruction,
E. se zaveda, da zaščita kritične infrastrukture zahteva dosledno, kooperativno partnerstvo med lastniki in operaterji take infrastrukture ter oblastmi držav članic; ugotavlja, da morata analiza in obravnava tveganja v vsaki infrastrukturi temeljiti na strogih, v EU določenih postopkih in standardih; ugotavlja, da so za obravnavo tveganj znotraj fizičnih objektov, postopkov nabave, informacijskih tehnologij in komunikacijskih omrežij v končni fazi odgovorni lastniki in operaterji, ki skrbijo za vsakodnevno delovanje teh infrastruktur; vendar ugotavlja, da morajo EU in države članice na vseh ravneh javnih organov, vključno s finančnimi in drugimi spodbudami, kot in kadar je to primerno, pomagati, svetovati, podpirati in nadzorovati industrijo pri izpolnjevanju njenih obveznosti; v tej zvezi ugotavlja, da morajo imeti operaterji možnost posredovati obstoječe podatke organom in da morajo slednji prevzeti odgovornost za analizo podatkov ter za razvoj ustreznih varnostnih rešitev v povezavi z operaterji; ker je bistvenega pomena , da se v vsakem posamičnem primeru, povezanem s temi dejavnostmi, zagotovi temeljna pravica do zaščite podatkov na evropski in nacionalni ravni .
E. recognising that to protect critical infrastructure requires a consistent, cooperative partnership between owners and operators of such infrastructure and Member State authorities; noting that analysing and managing risk in each infrastructure must be based on strict EU-set processes and standards; noting that the responsibility of managing risk within physical facilities, supply chains, information technologies and communication networks ultimately rests with the owners and operators who are in charge of the day to day running of those infrastructures; noting, however, that the EU and Member States should assist, instruct, support and monitor industry at all levels of public authority, including through financial and other incentives, as and when appropriate, to perform their obligations; noting, in this regard, that operators should be able to forward existing information to the authorities and that the latter take responsibility for analysing the information and devising appropriate security solutions in conjunction with the operators; whereas it is vital that the fundamental right to data protection is ensured at European and national levels in each individual case linked with these activities,
– je prepričan, da je treba zaradi vedno bolj zahtevnega tveganja, v katerem se uporablja informacijska tehnologija vrhunske kakovosti, nadzorne sisteme dograjevati v sodelovanju z Evropsko agencijo za varovanje omrežij in podatkov (ENISA) in pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi.
F. convinced of the need to strengthen computer protection systems in cooperation with European (e.g. ENISA) and national competent authorities in the face of an ever more sophisticated threat, by making use of leading-edge information technologies,