natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kot del teh dejavnosti globalnega skrbnika ICSD-ji nudijo program posojanja in druge tristranske storitve; in
As part of these global custodian activities, ICSDs provide lending programme and other tri-party services; and
(c) osrednje nasprotne stranke (central counterparts - CCP-ji), ki opravljajo dejavnosti osrednjega zagotavljanja in v večini primerov dejavnosti poračunavanja neto saldov (oboje je v sporočilu Komisije opredeljeno kot obračun).
(c) central counterparts (CCPs), which perform central guarantee and, in most cases, netting activities (both defined as clearing in the Commission's communication).
Ker je ključna naloga CCP-jev nadomestiti vsako nasprotno stranko trgovine s posredovanjem pri transakcijah, združujejo nadomestna tveganja skupaj s svojimi člani obračunskega sistema;
Since the essential mission of CCPs consists of replacing each counterparty to the trade by interposing themselves in the transactions, they concentrate replacement risks together with their Clearing Members;
(d) depozitne banke, ki ponujajo storitve obračuna in poravnave in ki lahko sodelujejo pri storitvah CCP-jev kot članice obračunskega sistema.
(d) custodian banks, which offer clearing and settlement services and which can participate in CCP services as Clearing Members.
3. meni, da mora zakonodaja EU načeloma biti predmet analize stroškov in koristi ter da se mora EU zateči k zakonodaji, kjer obstaja očitno tveganje tržne nepopolnosti in kjer zakonodaja predstavlja učinkovit in skladen način za razrešitev jasno opredeljenih težav;
(MiFid) and focus on: (a) bringing down the cost of cross-border clearing and settlement; (b) ensuring that systemic or any other remaining risk in cross-border clearing and settlement is properly managed and regulated; (c) encouraging the integration of clearing and settlement by removing competitive distortions; and (d) ensuring proper transparency and governance arrangements,3.
4. odločno trdi, da nobena nova uredba na tem področju ne sme podvajati obstoječe uredbe za posebne subjekte; ugotavlja, da je to zlasti pomembno za izogibanje dvojni ureditvi sektorja bančnih in investicijskih storitev; daje prednost funkcionalnemu pristopu k ureditvi, ki upošteva različne profile tveganj in konkurenčne položaje različnih subjektov ter vlogo CRVP-jev, ki jo priznava večina držav članic;
Believes that, as a general principle, legislation by the EU should be subject to a cost-benefit analysis and that the EU should resort to legislation where there is clear risk of market failure and where legislation is an effective and proportionate way to remedy clearly identified problems; 4.
5. je prepričan, da se nepotrebnim urejevalnim bremenom lahko najbolje izogne s pozorno obravnavo analize, katere cilj je opredeliti tiste zadeve, pri katerih bi lahko bila potrebna pravila;
Strongly asserts that any new regulation in this area should not duplicate existing regulation for specific entities; notes that this is particularly important in order to avoid double regulation of the banking and investment services sector; prefers a functional approach to regulation which takes into account different risk profiles and competitive situations of different entities as well as the role of CSDs recognised by most Member States; 5.
7. pozdravlja odločbo Komisije, da bo izvedla presojo vplivov, ki mora vključevati natančno analizo morebitnih stroškov in koristi tako zakonodajnih kot nezakonodajnih možnosti ter njihov obseg;
Welcomes the Commission decision to conduct an impact assessment which should include a thorough analysis of the potential costs and benefits of both legislative and non-legislative options, and their respective scope;
11. meni, da se mora predlog Komisije, če bi se odločila za zakonodajo na podlagi rezultatov študij o presoji vplivov, osredotočiti predvsem na:
Believes that if the Commission, on the basis of the results of the impact assessment study, does opt for legislation, its proposal should particularly focus on:
i) ponovno potrditev in krepitev pravic dostopa, da se zagotovi pravičen in nediskriminatoren dostop do ponudnikov storitev obračuna in poravnave;
(i) re-confirming and strengthening access rights in order to ensure fair and non-discriminatory access to central clearing and settlement service providers;
ii) krepitev pravic do poslovanja v drugi državi za ponudnike storitev obračuna in poravnave, ob podpori, ko je to potrebno, približevanja gospodarskih predpisov;
(ii) strengthening passporting rights for providers of clearing and settlement services supported, when needed, by regulatory convergence;
iii) omogočanje preglednosti in omogočanje učinkovitega delovanja tržnih sil;
(iii) allowing for transparency and enabling market forces to work effectively;
iv) doseganje doslednosti ureditve, preglednosti in upravljanja, ki bi ponudnikom storitev obračuna in poravnave omogočila nadzor sistemskega tveganja in protikonkurenčnega obnašanja;
(iv) achieving consistency of regulation, supervision and transparency to enable providers of clearing and settlement services to manage systemic risk and anti-competitive behaviour;
v) vzpostavitev funkcionalnega pristopa različnih akterjev k ureditvi, ki upošteva različne profile tveganj in konkurenčne položaje različnih subjektov;
(v) establishing a functional approach to the regulation of differentplayers, which takes into account the different risk profiles and competitive situations of different entities;
vi) vpeljavo opredelitev, ki so v skladu z obstoječimi tržnimi praksami in terminologijo, ki se uporablja globalno in v okviru EU;
(vi) introducing definitions that are coherent and consistent with existing market practices and with the terms used globally and within the EU;
13. meni, da je zmanjšanje stroškov čezmejnega obračuna in poravnave nujno predvsem za odstranitev 15 „ovir skupine Giovannini“, po možnosti prek tržnih mehanizmov; zahteva, da vsi javni organi in zasebni udeleženci podvojijo svoja prizadevanja za njihovo odstranitev; podpira prizadevanja Komisije za usklajevanje tega projekta prek skupine CESAME;
Believes that bringing down the cost of cross-border clearing and settlement necessitates in particular the removal of the 15 "Giovannini barriers", through market mechanisms when possible; urges all entities, both public and private, to re-double their efforts to remove them; supports the Commission's efforts to coordinate this project via the CESAME Group;14.
14. je zaskrbljen, da bi osredotočanje na novo direktivo in negotovost, ki bi s tem nastala, pomenilo odvrnitev od prizadevanj za odstranitev ovir „skupine Giovannini“ (vključno s pomembnimi naložbenimi programi, ki temeljijo na širokem soglasju o ustreznih tehnologijah); meni, da bi moral biti, če je potrebno, prvi cilj uredbe odstranitev tistih pravnih in fiskalnih ovir, ki se jih ne da odstraniti brez posredovanja javnosti;
Is concerned that focusing on a new directive, and the uncertainty this would involve, would be a distraction from efforts to remove the Giovannini barriers (including significant investment programmes, based on a broad consensus on appropriate technologies); believes that regulation should, if necessary, have as its primary goal the removal of those legal and fiscal barriers that cannot be removed without public intervention;
16. meni, da so davčne ovire razlog za visoke stroške čezmejnega obračuna in poravnave; podpira trenutna prizadevanja za zmanjšanje teh ovir; pozdravlja delovno skupino za davčne zadeve, ki jo je uvedla Komisija zato, da se začne izvajati proces koordinacije in harmonizacije davčnih zadev;
Believes that fiscal barriers are a reason for higher costs in cross-border clearing and settlement; supports ongoing attempts to reduce these barriers; welcomes the working group on fiscal issues, introduced by the Commission with a view to launching a process of coordination and harmonisation in tax matters;
Standardi Odbora evropskih regulativnih organov s področja vrednostnih papirjev (CESR) in Evropskega sistema centralnih bank (ESCB)
CESR/ESCB Standards
19. obžaluje, da se CESR in Evropski sistem centralnih bank (ESCB) nista bolj na široko in odprto posvetovala z zadevnimi udeleženci trga in drugimi evropskimi ustanovami; vprašuje o uporabnosti koncepta CESR–ESCB, t.i. „pomembnega skrbnika“, saj je dvoumen; meni, da morajo standardi CESR-ESCB zagotavljati, da ne prihaja do dvojne ureditve za institucije, za katere že veljajo predpisi o bančništvu;
Regrets that the CESR and the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) did not consult more widely and openly the market players concerned as well as other European institutions; questions the usefulness of the CESR-ESCB concept of a "significant custodian", as it is ambiguous; believes that the CESR-ESCB standards must ensure there is no double regulation for institutions already subject to banking regulation;20.
21. je zaskrbljen, da kljub odločitvi CESR, da preloži izvajanje standardov, nekateri urejevalci nadaljujejo in že zahtevajo njihovo izvajanje s strani udeležencev trga; zaskrbljen je tudi zaradi poročil, da CESR-ESCB ponovno oblikujeta standarde brez posvetovanja in za zaprtimi vrati;
Is concerned that, despite CESR's decision to postpone implementation of the standards, some regulators are going ahead and are already requiring their implementation by market participants; is further concerned at reports that the standards are being redrafted by CESR-ESCB without consultation and behind closed doors;
(i) zagotavljanje, da se Evropskemu parlamentu pošlje obvestilo o vseh pooblastilih, ki so jih poslali SECR, in tudi zagotavljanje, da CESR čim prej obvešča Evropski parlament o delu, izvedenem na stopnji 3, v zvezi s vsebinami, ki sprožajo občutljiva politična vprašanja;
(i) ensuring that notification is sent to the European Parliament of all mandates sent to CESR and also ensuring that CESR keeps the European Parliament informed, at the earliest possible stage, of work carried out at Level 3 on subjects which raise sensitive political issues;
(ii) razvijanje in izboljšanje učinkovitosti parlamentarnih zaslišanj s predstavniki CESR s težavnimi vprašanji in navzkrižnim zasliševanjem;
(ii) developing and enhancing the effectiveness of parliamentary hearings with representatives of CESR, with tough questioning and cross-examination;
(iii) postopek peticij, s katerim bi lahko državljani, ki so zaskrbljeni glede določenih odločitev CESR, podali uradna stališča Odboru za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve;
(iii) a petition process whereby citizens who are concerned about particular CESR decisions could make formal representations to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs;
(iv) predložitev rednih pisnih poročil CESR Odboru za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve;
(iv) submission of regular written reports by CESR to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs;
KOM(2004) 312 končno, 28.4.2004 ne razlikujejo jasno med dejavnostmi različnih sektorjev na trgu in da jih je treba zantno izboljšati, če bo zakonodaja predlagana;
COM(2004) 312 final, 28.4.2004 do not clearly distinguish between the activities of different sectors of the market and that they must be significantly improved if legislation is proposed;24.
24. priznava obsežne učinke in velike prednosti, ki lahko izhajajo iz dovoljene koncentracije; opozarja, da uporabniki storitev obračuna in poravnave že več let zahtevajo konsolidacijo in da je od sedanje konsolidacije, če bo ustrezno nadzirana, pričakovati, da bo prinesla nadaljnje koristi v prihodnosti; meni, da odsotnost primernega zakonskega in predpisnega okvira ne omogoča oblikovanja enakih konkurenčnih pogojev, potrebnih za spodbujanje vključevanja;
Recognises the benefits of scale and scope that can flow from allowing concentration; notes that users of clearing and settlement services have been calling for consolidation for many years and that recent consolidation, if properly controlled, is expected to yield further benefits in the near future; believes that the absence of an appropriate legislative and regulatory framework does not allow for creation of the level playing field needed to foster integration;
26. se strinja, da si nekateri deli industrije sistema obračuna in poravnave zaslužijo več pozornosti s stališča politike konkurence; priznava, da imajo določena podjetja velik delež na trgu storitev obračuna in poravnave, a to samo po sebi ni protikonkurenčno; meni, da so stranke prizadete in je intervencija javnega reda upravičena samo tam, kjer je prevladujoči položaj zlorabljen;
Agrees that some parts of the clearing and settlement system industry deserve more careful attention from a competition policy perspective; recognises that certain firms have a large share of the market for clearing and settlement services but that this is not, in itself, anti-competitive; considers it is only where a dominant position is abused that customers suffer and public policy intervention is justified;
28. meni, da so pravice učinkovitega in preglednega nediskriminatorega dostopa do storitev obračuna in poravnave pomembne pri zagotavljanju konkurenčnega integriranega finančnega trga v EU; priporoča uporabo možnosti proaktivnega izvrševanja Direktive 2004/39/ES, skupaj s previdno uporabo splošnih pooblastil Komisije glede konkurence za zagotovitev, da omejitve dostopa ne bodo zlorabljene v protikonkurenčne namene;
Believes that effective and transparent non-discriminatory access rights to clearing and settlement services are important in ensuring a competitive integrated financial market in the EU; recommends using the possibility of pro-active enforcement of Directive 2004/39/EC, along with vigilant use of the Commission’s general competition powers, to ensure access restrictions are not abused for anti-competitive reasons;
30. podpira presojo vplivov, ki jo trenutno izvaja Komisija, za ocenitev potrebe po zakonodajnih ukrepih; podpira zamisli Komisije o preglednosti cenovnih struktur; ugotavlja, da lahko pride do težav s primerljivostjo, če je več sestavin stroškov pogosto združenih v enotno tarifno sestavino; se sprašuje o potrebnosti ločevanja na „bistvene“ dejavnosti obračuna in poravnave ter tako imenovane storitve "z dodano vrednostjo“, z namenom obravnavanja upravičenih vprašanj glede svobodne konkurence, nediskriminatornega dostopa in ublažitve tveganja; pričakuje, da bodo predlogi Komisije s tega področja sorazmerni s težavami, ugotovljenimi na trgu;
Supports the ongoing impact assessment which the Commission is undertaking to assess the need for legislative measures; supports the Commission's ideas regarding the transparency of pricing structures; notes that comparability difficulties can arise if several cost components are combined together in a single tariff component; questions whether it is necessary to separate "core" clearing and settlement activities and so-called "value-added" services in order to address legitimate questions regarding free competition, non-discriminatory access and risk mitigation; expects the potential Commission's proposals in this area to be proportionate to problems identified in the market;
Obračun in poravnava v Evropski uniji
Clearing and settlement in the European Union
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 3605/93 glede kakovosti statističnih podatkov v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 as regards the quality of statistical data in the context of the excessive deficit procedure
(Vrsta postopka temelji na pravni podlagi, ki jo predlaga Komisija.)
(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission)
o predlogu uredbe Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 3605/93 glede kakovosti statističnih podatkov v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 as regards the quality of statistical data in the context of the excessive deficit procedure
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0071 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0071 )
– ob upoštevanju tretjega pododstavka člena 104(14) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0108/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 104(14), third indent, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0108/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6–0181/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0181/2005 ),
(2) Vlogo Komisije kot statističnega organa v tem okviru v imenu Komisije izvaja Eurostat.
(2) The role of the Commission, as statistical authority, in that context is specifically exercised by Eurostat, on behalf of the Commission.
Kot oddelek Komisije, pristojen za izvajanje nalog Komisije v zvezi s pripravljanjem statističnih podatkov Skupnosti mora Eurostata izvajati naloge v skladu z načeli nepristranskosti, zanesljivosti, relevantnosti, stroškovne učinkovitosti, statistične zaupnosti in preglednosti, kot so določena v Sklepu Komisije z dne 21. aprila 1997 o vlogi Eurostata pri pripravi statističnih podatkov Skupnosti.
As the Commission department responsible for carrying out the tasks devolving on the Commission as regards the production of Community statistics, Eurostat is required to execute its tasks in accordance with the principles of impartiality, reliability, relevance, cost-effectiveness, statistical confidentiality and transparency, as laid down in Commission Decision of 21 April 1997 on the role of Eurostat as regards the production of Community statistics.
Pravila ravnanja za področje evropske statistike, ki jih bodo skupaj pripravili evropski statistični instituti in Eurostat, morajo okrepiti načela poklicne neodvisnosti, zadostnosti virov in kakovosti statističnih podatkov.
The European Statistics Code of Practice, which will be set up jointly by the European Statistical Institutes and Eurostat , should enhance the principles of professional independence, adequacy of resources and quality of statistical data.
Pravila ravnanja za področje evropske statistike, dogovorjena med Eurostatom in nacionalnimi statističnimi organi, ki jih bo objavila Komisija, morajo tudi prispevati k izboljšanju statističnih podatkov.
The European Statistics Code of Practice, jointly agreed by Eurostat and the national statistical authorities, that will be published by the Commission, should also contribute to the improvement of the statistical data.
(5) Verodostojnost proračunskega nadzora je bistveno odvisna od zanesljivih proračunskih statističnih podatkov.
(5) The credibility of budgetary surveillance crucially hinges upon reliable budgetary statistics.
Izredno pomembno je, da so podatki, ki jih sporočijo države članice v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 3605/93 in ki jih Komisija posreduje Svetu v skladu s Protokolom, zelo kakovostni.
It is of the utmost importance that data reported by Member States under Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 and provided by the Commission to the Council in accordance with the Protocol are of high quality.
V tem okviru bi morale biti točke 1.5, 1.6 in 1.7 sklepov Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 22. in 23. marca 2005 in Temeljna načela uradnih statistik divizije za statistiko pri oddelku Združenih narodov za gospodarske in socialne zadeve osnova za doseganje zahtevanih standardov kakovosti.
In this context, the conclusions of the European Council of Brussels of 22 and 23 March 2005, points 1.5, 1.6 and 1.7, and the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics of the Statistics Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs should be considered as a basis on which to meet the required high quality standards.
Za izboljšanje kakovosti fiskalnih statistik, za doseganje najvišjih mednarodnih standardov in za upoštevanje smernic, ki jih je določil Svet na področju statističnega upravljanja.
To improve the quality of fiscal statistics in order to meet the highest international standards and comply with the guidelines set forth by the Council in the field of statistical governance.
(9) Med Komisijo in statističnimi organi držav članic je treba vzpostaviti stalen dialog, da se zagotovi kakovost dejanskih podatkov, ki jih poročajo države članice, in državnih računov, ki so podlaga za te podatke.
(9) A permanent dialogue should be established between the Commission and the Member States’ statistical authorities in order to ensure the quality both of the actual data reported by Member States and of the underlying government accounts.
V ta namen lahko Komisija redno izvaja obiske, namenjene pogovorom, in temeljite nadzorne obiske ter tako krepi spremljanje sporočenih podatkov in zagotavlja stalno zanesljivost kakovosti podatkov.
To that end, both dialogue visits and in-depth monitoring visits may be carried out regularly by the Commission thus enhancing the monitoring of the reported data and providing a permanent assurance of the quality of the data.
Države članice morajo Komisiji nemudoma zagotoviti dostop do informacij.
Member States have to promptly provide the Commission with access to the information
Program Komisije, ki se oblikuje v skladu z načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, bi moral pojasniti dvomljive primere in tudi spodbujati dobre prakse.
The programme of the Commission that shall be established according to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality should serve to clarify the cases that may raise doubts and also to promote good practises.
Člen 7, odstavek 1 (Uredba (ES) št. 3605/93)
Article 7, paragraph 1 (Regulation (EC) No 3605/93)
Države članice hitro obvestijo Komisijo o kakršni koli pomembni spremembi dejanskih in načrtovanih javnofinančnih primanjkljajev ter že sporočenih zneskih dolga.
Member States shall promptly inform the Commission of any significant revision in their actual and planned government deficit and debt figures already reported.
Države članice nemudoma obvestijo Komisijo o kakršni koli pomembni spremembi dejanskih in načrtovanih javnofinančnih primanjkljajev ter že sporočenih zneskih dolga.
Member States shall inform the Commission without delay of any significant revision in their actual and planned government deficit and debt figures already reported.
Ta predlog spremembe želi pojasniti netočnost sestave prvotnega besedila.
This amendment is designed to clarify the imprecise wording of the original text.
Člen 7, odstavek 2 a (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 3605/93)
Article 7, paragraph 2 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 3605/93)
Če podatki o načrtovanem vladnem primanjkljaju in dolgu ali revizije teh podatkov ne uporabljajo"skupne zunanje hipoteze", ki jo je Komisija objavila v okviru usklajevanja gospodarskih in fiskalnih politik za primerjavo med državami članicami, države članice podrobno pojasnijo razloge za odklone in izračunajo razliko med predvidevanji.
In the event that the planned government deficit and debt figures or the revisions thereof do not use the "Common External Hypothesis", made public by the Commission in the context of the coordination of economic and fiscal policies to make comparisons between Member States, the Member States shall explain in depth the reason for the divergence and calculate the differential between the projections.
Ta predlog spremembe temelji na točkah 1.5, 1.6. in 1.7 sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 22. in 23. marca 2005 in je v skladu s Temeljnimi načeli uradnih statistik divizije za statistiko pri oddelku Združenih narodov za gospodarske in socialne zadeve.
This amendment is based on the conclusions of the Presidency of the European Council of Brussels of the 22nd and 23rd of March of 2005 points 1.5, 1.6. and 1.7 and it is in line with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statics of the static division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affaires
Člen 9, odstavek 1 (Uredba (ES) št. 3605/93)
Article 9, paragraph 1 (Regulation (EC) No 3605/93)
Komisija (Eurostat) ocenjuje kakovost dejanskih podatkov, ki jih poročajo države članice, in temeljnih državnih računov.
The Commission (Eurostat) shall assess the quality both of actual data reported by Member States and of the underlying government accounts.