natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Parlament je 10. novembra 2005 sklenil, da bo začel razprave o političnih in upravnih vidikih komitoloških postopkov in sklenil, da bosta strokovna pogajanja vodila predsednik konference predsednikov odborov Daul in predstavnik odbora za ustavne zadeve Corbett.
Parliament decided on 10 November 2005 to begin discussions on both the political and administrative aspects of the comitology procedures and decided that exploratory talks should be conducted jointly by Mr. Daul, Chairman of the Conference of Committee Chairmen, and Mr. Corbett, as representative of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs.
Poročevalec je odbor za ustavne zadeve obvestil na seji 23. januarja 2006 in na naslednjih sejah o napredku pri pogovorih in njihovem pričakovanem izidu.
In its meeting of 23 January 2006 and in subsequent meetings the Committee on Constitutional Affairs was informed by its Rapporteur about the progress of the talks and their foreseeable outcome.
Hkrati je Parlament kot veja proračunskega organa s prekinitvijo financiranja komitoloških odborov stopnjeval pritisk na pogajanja.
Meanwhile Parliament increased pressure on the negotiations as branch of the budgetary authority by withholding funding of comitology committees.
Te posebne okoliščine in sredstva so pod izjemno dejavnim avstrijskim predsedstvom vodile do zapletenih pogajanj, po katerih je bil 13. junija dosežen sporazum o svežnju, ki nam je sedaj predstavljen.
These exceptional circumstances and means led, under the very engaged Austrian Presidency, to complex negotiations which resulted in an agreement on 2 June on the package now in front of us.
Svet je 2. junija zaprosil Evropski parlament za mnenje o končnem besedilu kompromisa za nov regulativni postopek s pregledom
The Council asked Parliament on 13 June for an opinion on the final compromise text for a new regulatory procedure with scrutiny
Pismo generalnega sekretarja/visokega predstavnika SGS6/06990. , ki bo vključeno v že obstoječi sklep glede komitologije, da bi nadomestil postopek, ki ga je prvotno predlagala Komisija.
letter SGS6/06990 of the Secretary General/High Representative which would be incorporated into the existing comitology Decision instead of the procedure proposed by the Commission originally.
To besedilo je bilo posredovano v ponovno posvetovanje Odboru za ustavne zadeve v skladu s členom 55(3) poslovnika.
This text was referred to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs under Rule 55(3) of the Rules of Procedure as a reconsultation.
Hkrati sta bila posredovana v odobritev dva osnutka izjav glede kompromisnega besedila, prvega so posredovali Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija, drugega Komisija
At the same time were transmitted two draft statements for approval in connection with this compromise text, one by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission and one by the Commission,
10125/06 z dne 6. junija 2006. skupaj z dvema osnutkoma izjav Komisije, ki nista bila vključena v "sveženj" Sveta ter se nanašata na jezikovni režim in vprašanje prilagajanja veljavnih aktov.
10125/06 of 6 June 2006 together with two draft Commission declarations not included in the Council's 'package' and dealing with the language regime and the question of alignment of acts in force.
Konferenca predsednikov je po zaslišanju Daula in Corbetta zaprosila Odbor za ustavne zadeve, s katerim se je Svet ponovno posvetoval, naj preuči rezultate pogajanj, da bi tako na plenarnem zasedanju predstavili priporočilo.
The Conference of Presidents after having heard Mr. Daul and Mr. Corbett, asked the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, having been reconsulted by the Council, to examine the results of the negotiations in order to submit a recommendation to the plenary.
Nov regulativni postopek s pregledom
The new regulatory procedure with scrutiny
Besedilo novega postopka je priloženo temu poročilu.
The text of the new procedure is annexed to this report.
Postopek, kot ga je prvotno predlagala Komisija, zajema dve ločeni fazi: tako imenovano fazo izvrševanja, v kateri Komisija predloži svoje predloge ukrepov predstavnikom nacionalnih oblasti v zadevnem odboru, ter tako imenovano fazo nadzora, v kateri se predlog predloži Parlamentu in Svetu.
The procedure comprises, as proposed initially by the Commission, two separate phases, a so called executive phase, where the Commission submits its draft measures to the representatives of national authorities in the relevant committee, and a so called supervisory phase, where the draft will be submitted to Parliament and Council.
Področje uporabe postopka je sedaj opredeljeno tako, da se nanaša na primere, v katerih je bil temeljni akt sprejet s postopkom soodločanja in predvideva "sprejetje ukrepov splošnega obsega za spreminjanje nebistvenih določb tega akta, vključno s črtanjem nekaterih takšnih določb ali z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb..."
The scope of the procedure is now defined as applying to cases where the basic instrument is adopted in codecision and 'provides for the adoption of measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of that instrument, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new non-essential elements...'.
Člen 2(2) novo.
Article 2(2) new
"Bistvene določbe" zakonodajnega akta sodijo v pristojnost zakonodajalca in se lahko spremenijo le z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom.
The 'essential elements' of a legislative act remain the domain of the legislator and can only be amended through the normal legislative procedure.
To je pojem "izvrševalnih ukrepov" z "zakonodajnim bistvom", kot je bilo že omenjeno v prvotnem predlogu Komisije
This is the concept of 'executive measures' with a 'legislative substance' already mentioned in the Commission's original proposal
Stran 3 obrazložitvenega memoranduma. in na katere se pogosto sklicuje kot na "kvazi-zakonodajne ukrepe", pojem, ki ga je Svet nazadnje le sprejel.
page three of the Explanatory Memorandum and now often referred to as 'quasi legislative measures', a concept which has finally been accepted by the Council.
Nov postopek je treba izbrati v temeljnem aktu, kadarkoli so prisotna merila.
The new procedure has to be chosen in the basic act whenever the criteria are present.
Merila pravno zavezujejo zakonodajalca in so posledično pravno izvršljiva.
These are therefore binding upon the legislator and in consequence legally enforceable.
"Se sprejmejo v skladu s" v členu 2(2), novo, namesto "se sprejmejo z uporabo" v obstoječem členu 2.
'shall be adopted in accordance with' in Article 2(2) new instead of 'should be adopted by use of ' in the existing Article 2
Bistvena lastnost nadzorne faze postopka je ta, da nasprotno od obstoječih postopkov komitologije, Parlament in Svet načeloma enakopravno sodelujeta, z majhnim odstopanjem, takrat, ko se odbor ne strinja z ukrepi, ki jih načrtuje Komisija.
The main feature of the supervisory phase of the procedure is that, parting from the existing comitology procedures, Parliament and Council are in principle placed on an equal footing, with a minor difference when the committee does not agree with the measures envisaged by the Commission.
Za razliko od izvirnega predloga morajo biti možna nasprotovanja Parlamenta in Sveta utemeljena tako, da se nanašajo na omejeno število razlogov.
Different from the original proposal is that Parliament's and Council's possible objections have to be motivated by reference to a limited number of reasons.
Drugo vprašanje pa je, ali je to dober primer "boljše priprave zakonodaje".
Whether this is a good example of 'better law making' is a different question.
Dejanski in skoraj revolucionaren dosežek novega postopka je dejstvo, da je bila opuščena dogma iz obstoječe pogodbe, ki je narekovala, da se v primeru prenosa "izvedbenih pooblastil" na Komisijo, le-ta izvajajo brez "posredovanja" zakonodajalca in da člen 202 Pogodbe ne dovoljuje nadaljnjega poseganja.
The real and almost revolutionary achievement of the new procedure is the fact that a dogma has been abandoned, the dogma whereby under the existing Treaty when 'implementing powers' are delegated to the Commission, they have to be exercised by it without 'interference' by the legislator and that Article 202 of the Treaty does not allow to go further.
Glej predhodno stališče Komisije, navedeno v zgornji opombi 3.
See the Commission's earlier position quoted in footnote 3 above.
Novi postopek je dober primer razvijanja institucionalnega sistema brez spreminjanja pogodbe, da bi tako izboljšali upravljanje Unije.
The new procedure is a good example of developing the institutional system without Treaty change in order to improve the governance of the Union.
Če bo razumno uporabljen, bo koristil vsem trem institucijam ter okrepil demokratični značaj procesa odločanja.
It will, wisely applied, be in the interest of all three institutions and enhance the democratic character of decision making.
Besedilo osnutka izjav je ravno tako priloženo temu poročilu.
The text of the draft statements is equally annexed to this report.
Izjave ne potrebujejo komentarja, ampak odražajo zelo pomembne prispevke, o katerih se je razpravljalo: interes Sveta, ki želi, da se "določbe časovne omejitve" v prihodnje uporabljajo samo izredno (točka 3) in interes Parlamenta, ki želi prilagoditev obstoječe zakonodaje (točki 4 in 5).
They do not need to be commented but reflect rather important points brought into the negotiations: The interest of the Council to see sunset clauses to be used in the future only exceptionally (point 3.) and the interest of Parliament to see existing law adjusted ( points 4. and 5.).
Glede prejšnje točke je res, da obstoj novega postopka daje Parlamentu zadostna jamstva za nadzor uporabe prenesenih pristojnosti, tako da mu ni treba več uporabljati "določbe časovne omejitve" glede samega pooblaščanja.
On the former point, it is true that the existence of the new procedure gives Parliament sufficient guarantees that it can control the use of delegated powers, so that it will no longer need to have recourse to sunset clauses on the delegation itself.
Vendar bi bilo narobe, če bi popolnoma izločili pravico, ki jo nedvomno ima zakonodajalec v okviru pogodb, da določi rok, če se zdijo okoliščine primerne.
However, it would be wrong to rule out entirely the right that the legislator undoubtedly has under the treaties to put a time limit, if circumstances arise in which it would be appropriate.
Nazadnje je prišlo do sporazuma glede prednostnega seznama obstoječe zakonodaje, ki vsebuje 25 točk.
On the latter point, a priority list of 25 items of existing legislation has been agreed upon.
Komisija bo nato preučila vso preostalo zakonodajo in predložila predloge za sprejetje do konca leta 2007.
The Commission will then screen all other legislation and bring forward proposals to adapt it, by the end of 2007.
Izjave Komisije so bistvenega pomena za izboljšanje pretoka informacij, zlasti na področju zakonodaje finančnih storitev.
The declarations of the Commission are essential to improve the flow of information especially in the field of financial services legislation.
Jasno je tudi, da "acquis Lamfalussy" glede specifičnih pravic do informacij na področju finančnih storitev, ostaja še naprej v uporabi.
They make it also clear that the 'Lamfalussy acquis' with regard to special information rights in the field of the financial services remains in place.
Dodatne izjave Komisije so velikega pomena za časovni razpored, s katerim razpolagata Parlament in Svet za izvajanje pravice pregleda.
The additional declarations by the Commission are of great relevance for the time available for Parliament and Council in order to exercise their right of scrutiny.
Komisija se zavezuje, da bo nadaljevala s pregledom vseh veljavnih aktov, sprejetih s postopkom soodločanja, da se tako prilagodijo novemu postopku in da se predloži primerne predloge do konca leta 2007.
The Commission commits itself further to examine all acts in force adopted under codecision with a view to adapt them to the new procedure and make appropriate proposals before the end of 2007.
Vendar pa se Svet ne zavezuje k temu časovnemu razporedu.
However, there is no commitment to that timetable by the Council.
Brez teh izjav novi postopek ne bi bil sprejet in njegov dejanski vpliv ne bi bil zagotovljen.
Without these statements the new procedure would not have been achieved and its practical impact would not have been secured.
To so bistveni sestavni deli svežnja in vaš poročevalec priporoča, da se v celoti sprejmejo.
They are essential elements of the package which your Rapporteur recommends to approve as a whole.
PRILOGA: Besedila, ki so rezultat pogajanj ("komitološki sveženj")
ANNEX: Texts forming the outcome of negotiations ('comitology package')
EVROPSKE UNIJE
THE EUROPEAN UNION
Bruselj, 9. junij 2006 (13.06)
Brussels, 9 June 2006 (13.06)
Medinstitucionalna zadeva:
Interinstitutional File:
4) Skupino prijateljev predsedstva (komitologija)
4) Friends of the Presidency Group (Committee Procedure)
6) Spremenjeni predlog sklepa Sveta o spremembi Sklepa 1999/468/ES o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil
6) Amended proposal for a Council Decision of amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission
Delegacije v Prilogi prejmejo osnutek končnega besedila kompromisa za nov postopek, pripravljenega na osnovi rezultata sestanka Skupine prijateljev predsedstva 8. junija 2006.
Delegations will find attached a draft of the final compromise text for a new procedure resulting from the meeting of the Permanent Representatives Committee on 8 June 2006.
Sklep Sveta z dne …
Council Decision of …
o spremembi Sklepa Sveta z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje
amending the Council Decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of
Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil
implementing powers conferred on the Commission
SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE JE
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti tretje alinee člena 202 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third indent of Article 202 thereof,
UL L ... ,
OJ L … ,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta
Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament
(1) Svet je sprejel Sklep 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil; ta sklep je predvidel omejeno število postopkov za izvajanje te pristojnosti;
(1) The Council adopted Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission; that Decision has provided for a limited number of procedures for the exercise of such powers.
(2) Ta sklep je treba spremeniti, da bi se vanj vključila nova vrsta postopka za uresničevanje izvedbenih pooblastil, tj. regulativni postopek s pregledom, ki bo zakonodajalcu omogočil, da nasprotuje sprejetju osnutka ukrepov, ko naznani, da ta presega izvedbena pooblastila, določena v temeljnem aktu, ali da ta osnutek ni skladen s ciljem ali z vsebino akta ali da v njem nista upoštevani načeli subsidiarnosti ali sorazmernosti.
(2) That Decision should be amended to introduce a new type of procedure for the exercise of those powers, the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, which allows the legislator to oppose the adoption of draft measures where it indicates that the draft exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic instrument, or that it is incompatible with the aim or the content of that instrument or fails to respect the principles of subsidiarity or proportionality.
(3) Regulativni postopek s pregledom je treba uporabiti v primeru ukrepov splošnega obsega za spreminjanje nebistvenih določb temeljnega akta, sprejetega v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe ES, vključno s črtanjem nekaterih takšnih določb ali z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb.
(3) It is necessary to follow the regulatory procedure with scrutiny for measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 TEC, including by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new non-essential elements.
(4) V tem okviru je treba izboljšati obveščanje Evropskega parlamenta o delu odborov.
(4) In this same framework, it should be ensured that the European Parliament receives better information on the work of committees,
Sklep Sveta z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil se spremeni:
The Council Decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission is hereby amended as follows:
(1) V preambuli se na koncu uvodne izjave (5) doda: "z izjemo regulativnega postopka s pregledom".
(1) In the preamble, at the end of recital 5, the words 'with the exception of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny' shall be added.
(2) V preambuli se po uvodni izjavi (7) doda naslednja nova uvodna izjava (7a):
(2) In the preamble, after recital 7, a new recital (7a) shall be added, to read as follows:
"(7a) Regulativni postopek s pregledom je treba uporabiti v primeru ukrepov splošnega obsega za spreminjanje nebistvenih določb temeljnega akta, sprejetega v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe ES, vključno s črtanjem nekaterih takšnih določb ali z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb. postopek mora obema vejama zakonodajne oblasti omogočiti pregled teh ukrepov še pred njihovim sprejetjem.
'(7a) The regulatory procedure with scrutiny should be followed as regards measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 TEC, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new non-essential elements; this procedure should enable the two arms of the legislative authority to scrutinise such measures before they are adopted.
Bistvene določbe zakonodajnega akta lahko spremeni samo zakonodajalec na podlagi Pogodbe."
The essential elements of a legislative act may only be amended by the legislator on the basis of the Treaty.'
(3) Uvodna izjava (10) se nadomesti z naslednjo uvodno izjavo:
(3) Recital 10 shall be replaced by the following recital:
"(10) Tretji cilj tega sklepa je izboljšati obveščanje Evropskega parlamenta; v ta namen se določi, da ga mora Komisija redno obveščati o postopkih v odborih, mu posredovati dokumente, ki se nanašajo na dejavnosti odborov, in ga obvestiti, kadar Svetu predloži ukrepe ali osnutke ukrepov, ki bi jih bilo potrebno sprejeti; posebno pozornost je treba nameniti obveščanju Evropskega parlamenta o delu odborov v okviru regulativnega postopka s pregledom in tako zagotoviti, da bo lahko Evropski parlament odločitve sprejemal v predvidenem roku."
'(10) The third purpose of this Decision is to improve information to the European Parliament by providing that the Commission should inform it on a regular basis of committee proceedings, that the Commission should transmit to it documents related to activities of committees and inform it whenever the Commission transmits to the Council measures or proposals for measures to be taken; particular attention will be paid to the provision of information to the European Parliament on the proceedings of committees in the framework of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, so as to ensure that the European Parliament takes a decision within the stipulated deadline.'
(4) V členu 1: v zadnji vrstici se med "5" in "6" doda "5a".
(4) In Article 1, '5a' shall be added between '5' and '6' on the last line.
(5) V členu 2:
(5) In Article 2:
i) na začetku prve alinee se doda: "1.
(i) the words '1.
Brez poseganja v odstavek 2";
Without prejudice to paragraph 2' shall be added at the beginning of the first paragraph;
ii) doda se naslednji odstavek 2:
(ii) a paragraph 2 shall be added as follows:
Če je v temeljnem aktu, sprejetem po postopku iz člena 251 Pogodbe, predvideno sprejetje ukrepov splošnega obsega za spreminjanje nebistvenih določb tega akta, vključno s črtanjem nekaterih takšnih določb ali z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb, se takšni ukrepi sprejmejo po regulativnem postopku s pregledom."
Where a basic instrument, adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 TEC, provides for the adoption of measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of that instrument, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new non-essential elements, those measures shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.'
(6) V členih 4(2) in 5(2) se za "205(2)" doda "in 4".
(6) In Article 4(2) and Article 5(2), 'and (4)' shall be added after 'Article 205(2)'.
(7) Po členu 5 se doda naslednji novi člen 5a:
(7) After Article 5, a new Article 5a shall be added, to read:
" Člen 5a
' Article 5a
Komisiji pomaga odbor za regulativni postopek s pregledom, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic, predseduje pa mu predstavnik Komisije.
The Commission shall be assisted by a Regulatory Procedure with Scrutiny Committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
Predstavnik Komisije predloži odboru osnutek potrebnih ukrepov.
The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a draft of the measures to be taken.
Odbor poda mnenje o njem v roku, ki ga lahko določi predsednik glede na nujnost zadeve.
The Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time‑limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter.
Odbor poda mnenje z večino, določeno v členu 205(2) in (4) Pogodbe, ki se uporablja za sprejemanje odločitev Sveta na predlog Komisije.
The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 205(2) and (4) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission.
Glasovi predstavnikov držav članic v odboru se ponderirajo na način iz navedenega člena.
The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the Committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article.
Če so ukrepi, ki jih načrtuje Komisija, skladni z mnenjem odbora, se uporabi naslednji postopek:
If the measures envisaged by the Commission are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee, the following procedure shall apply:
a) Komisija nemudoma predloži osnutek ukrepov Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu v pregled.
(a) The Commission shall without delay submit the draft measures for scrutiny by the Council and the European Parliament.
b) Evropski parlament z večino svojih članov ali Svet s kvalificirano večino lahko nasprotujeta sprejetju navedenega osnutka Komisije in v svoji odločitvi navedeta, da osnutek ukrepov, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, presega izvedbena pooblastila, določena v temeljnem aktu, da ta osnutek ni skladen s ciljem ali z vsebino temeljnega akta ali da v njem nista upoštevani načeli subsidiarnosti ali sorazmernosti.
(b) The European Parliament, acting by a majority of its component members, or the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may oppose the adoption of the draft by the Commission, on the grounds that the draft measures proposed by the Commission exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic instrument or that the draft is not compatible with the aim or the content of the basic instrument or does not respect the principles of subsidiarity or proportionality.
c) Če Evropski parlament ali Svet nasprotujeta osnutku ukrepov v roku treh mesecev od njihove predložitve, jih Komisija ne sprejme.
(c) If, within three months from the date of referral to them, the European Parliament or the Council opposes the draft measures, the latter shall not be adopted by the Commission.
V tem primeru lahko Komisija odboru predloži spremenjeni osnutek ukrepov ali zakonodajni predlog na podlagi Pogodbe.
In that event, the Commission may submit to the Committee an amended draft of the measures or present a legislative proposal on the basis of the Treaty.