natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To predstavlja znatno povečanje (+59 %) glede na sedanjo zgornjo mejo (20,7 milijarde EUR), ki pa je v skladu s stališčem Parlamenta glede trenutne finančne perspektive; Parlament trdi, da obstaja manevrski prostor za višji obseg posojil, ne da bi se pri tem znatno povečalo potencialno tveganje za proračun EU.
This is a large increase from the current ceiling of EUR 20,7 billion (+59%), which is, however, in line with the position of the Parliament in the current FP arguing that there is scope for a higher volume of lending without increasing significantly the potential risk to the EU budget.
· Za celoten mandat se bo uporabljalo 65-odstotno splošno jamstveno kritje.
· A uniform "blanket" guarantee coverage of 65% would apply to the whole mandate.
V praksi to pomeni, da če se posojilo ne odplača, se aktivira jamstveni sklad, ki izvrši plačilo EIB (po de facto 100 % stopnji za vsako posojilo), v kolikor zahtevani znesek (zneski) ne presega(jo) 65 % vrednosti celotnega portfelja za posojila
In practice this would mean that if a loan is not repaid, the Guarantee Fund would be called on to repay the EIB (at a de facto rate of 100% for each individual loan) as long as the total amount(s) called would not exceed 65% of the value of the total loan portfolio.
V praksi je jamstveni sklad vse od svoje ustanovitve ukrepal le dvakrat in celo v teh dveh primerih je bil denar kasneje povrnjen.
In practice, the Guarantee Fund has only been called on twice since its start in 1994 and even in these two cases the money was eventually repaid.
Dejansko so tako vsi primanjkljaji 100-odstotno pokriti.
In practical terms, any defaults are therefore covered to 100%.
Praksa pa kaže, da bi se celo z nižjo splošno jamstveno stopnjo, v višini 55 %, dosegli isti rezultati. .
Based on experience, even a lower blanket guarantee rate of 55% would continue to achieve this.
Poročevalec meni, da je v praksi splošna jamstvena stopnja v višini 65 % prekomerna.
The rapporteur considers that, in practice, a blanket guarantee rate of 65% is exaggerated.
Zaradi tega je uvedel nižjo stopnjo (55 %), ki bi zelo verjetno zadostovala za zaščito financ Skupnosti pred izgubami.
He has introduced a lower rate of 55% which in all likelyhood would be sufficient to shelter the Community's finances from the risk of defaults.
· V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti na to, da EIB uporablja, zlasti na področju posojil zasebnemu sektorju, "shemo za porazdelitev tveganja", s katero si prizadeva pridobiti jamstva tretjih strani za poslovna tveganja v zvezi s posojili.
· It should be noted that, especially for loans to the private sector, the EIB also operates a so-called "risk-sharing scheme" by which it aims to obtain third-party guarantees for the commercial risks associated with the loans.
V takšnih primerih bi splošno jamstvo vseeno krilo "politična tveganja", kot so nemiri, državljanska vojna, razlastitev itd.
In such cases, the blanket guarantee would nevertheless still cover "political risks" such as unrest, civil war, expropriation etc.
· Poročevalec opozarja na dejstvo, da po odobritvi posojila znesek, ki se nakaže jamstvenemu skladu iz proračuna EU, trenutno znaša 9 % vrednosti posojila.
· The rapporteur recalls that when a loan is signed, the amount to be paid in to the Guarantee Fund from the EU budget currently stands at 9% of the loan value.
Ta stopnja ni vključena v predlog, ampak v uredbo o "mehanizmu za zagotavljanje sredstev", o kateri je Parlament sprejel poročilo februarja 2006.
This rate is not covered in this proposal but is contained in the Regulation on the "provisioning mechanism" on which the Parliament delivered its report in February 2006.
· V bistvu naj bi novi mehanizem za zagotavljanje sredstev deloval na "ex-post" osnovi, tj. na podlagi dejansko izplačanih posojil.
· Basically, the new provisioning mechanism would work on an "ex-post" basis, i.e. on the basis of loans actually paid out.
Trenutno mehanizem deluje na "ex-ante" osnovi, tj. temelji na predvidenih posojilih, za katera se pričakuje, da bodo odobrena.
Currently, the mechanism works on an "ex-ante" basis, i.e. based on forecasts of loans which are expected to be signed.
Ta novost naj bi vodila k smotrnejši uporabi sredstev, saj se ciljni znesek jamstvenega sklada lahko natančneje upošteva.
This should lead to a more rational use of the budget as the target amount of the Guarantee Fund can be kept more accurately.
Potrebni znesek za naslednje leto bo vključen v PPP in vpisan v rezervo.
The amount necessary for the following year will be budgeted in the PDB, in reserve.
Za prerazporeditev tega zneska v sklad bi se vsako leto vložil en predlog za prerazporeditev.
There would be one annual transfer proposal to consider its transfer to the Fund.
· Besedilo predloga Komisije predvideva tudi večje usklajevanje med posojili EIB in zunanjimi programi EU.
· Wording aiming to strengthen the linkage between EIB loans and the EU external programmes has been introduced in the Commission's proposal.
Poročevalec meni, da bi na tem področju lahko marsikaj izboljšali in zato je bil vložen predlog spremembe o skladnosti.
In the rapporteur's view, there is still room for some improvement here and an amendment on coherence has been introduced.
· Predlog želi tudi opredeliti glavna področja delovanja EIB v različnih regijah.
· The proposal also seeks to establish a definition of main areas of activity for the EIB in different regions.
Poročevalec meni, da so se prednostni sektorji sčasoma razvili, to pa ni nujno posledica skladnih političnih ciljev, ampak prej rezultat strokovnih znanj, s katerimi razpolaga EIB.
The rapporteur notes that these priority sectors have developed over time and not necessarily as a result of consistent policy objectives but, rather, as a result of the EIB's available expertise.
Poročevalec bi rad ponovno poudaril dejstvo, da je treba dejavnosti EIB prilagoditi tako, da bi sledile splošnim ciljem zunanje politike EU in jih podpirale ter bi se izvajale tam, kjer bi lahko ustvarile največ dodane vrednosti.
He would again underline that the EIB activities should be adapted to follow and support the general external policy goals of the EU and be implemented where they can add most value.
To bi pomenilo "podobne dejavnosti za podobne države".
This would imply "similar operations for similar countries".
Zato poročevalec zahteva, da Komisija nadalje pojasni ukrepe, ki jih namerava sprejeti v tej smeri.
He asks the Commission to further clarify which steps have been taken in this direction.
· Uvedena je nova geografska razporeditev mandata.
· A new geographical breakdown of the mandate is introduced.
Deleži med sedanjimi državami so rahlo spremenjeni, dodane pa so tudi nekatere nove države.
The shares between the current countries are slightly modified but, also, some new countries are included.
To se nanaša na vključitev držav južnega Kavkaza in osrednje Azije, kot je v preteklosti zahteval Parlament.
This relates to the inclusion of the Southern Caucasus and Central Asia countries, which the Parliament has called for in the past.
Poročevalec meni, da se sedaj lahko podpre predlagano ravnovesje med različnimi območji.
The rapporteur considers that the proposed balance between different areas can now be supported.
· Vpeljan je tudi "rezervni mandat" v višini 1,5 milijarde EUR.
· Also, a "reserve mandate" of EUR 1,5 billion is introduced.
Ta znesek se uporabi predvsem po naravnih katastrofah in/ali ob drugih nujnih primerih.
This is to be used mainly following natural disasters and/or other urgent crises.
Takšen primer je lahko obnova Libanona.
Reconstruction in Lebanon could be an example.
Z drugimi besedami, omejeni "področni mandat" bi se lahko uporabil za hitrejše vključevanje EIB po takšnih nujnih primerih, ne da bi se posebno navezali na eno geografsko območje.
In short, this limited "thematic mandate" would be used to involve the EIB more quickly following such emergencies without being attached to any specific a geographical region.
Poročevalec lahko podpre takšen pristop.
The rapporteur can support this approach.
Komisija za dejavnosti financiranja EIB predlaga naslednje zgornje meje:
The Commission suggests ceilings for EIB financing operations as follows:
Tabela 1: Predlagane zgornje meje za dejavnosti financiranja EIB in primerjava z obdobjem 2000 –2006
Table 1: Proposed ceilings for EIB financing operations and comparison with 2000-2006
POLITIKA/ MANDAT EU
EU POLICY/MANDATE
Predpristopne države
Pre-accession countries
- od katerih predpristopne države v obdobju 2007–2013
- of which pre-accession countries 2007-2013
Sredozemske države
Mediterranean countries
Zaradi spremembe mandata po vmesnem pregledu leta 2003 se je zgornja meja za Sredozemske države dejansko zvišala, saj je bila Turčija izključena iz sredozemskega mandata in vključena v mandat za jugovzhodne sosede.
Following the restructuring of the mandates after the mid-term review of 2003, the ceiling for Mediterranean countries was de facto increased, since Turkey was excluded from the Mediterranean mandate and included in the South Eastern Neighbours' one.
Vzhodna Evropa, Južni Kavkaz in Rusija
Eastern Europe, Southern Caucasus and Russia
Razvojno sodelovanje/gospodarsko sodelovanje
Development Cooperation/Economic Cooperation
Azija in Latinska Amerika
Asia and Latin America
AKP - Južna Afrika
ACP - South Africa
Skupno regionalni mandati
Total regional mandates
Rezervni mandat
Reserve mandate
Proračunski vpliv
Budgetary impact
· Poročevalec opozarja, da večletni finančni okvir 2007–2013 določa skupni znesek za zagotavljanje sredstev jamstvenemu skladu v višini 1.244 milijonov EUR (v cenah za leto 2004) oziroma 1.400 milijonov EUR v tekočih cenah.
· The rapporteur recalls that the MFF 2007-2013 establishes an overall amount for provisioning the Guarantee Fund of EUR 1 244 million (2004 prices), or 1 400 million in current prices.
· Poročevalec meni, da Komisija za svoje trenutno finančno načrtovanje uporablja pavšalni znesek 200 milijonov EUR letno, ki se ne sklada z dejanskimi proračunskimi tokovi.
· The rapporteur notes that the Commission, for its financial programming, is currently using a flat profile of EUR 200 million per year, which will not correspond to real budget flows.
Na začetku obdobja dejansko ne bo potrebe po dodatnih proračunskih izdatkih zaradi prehoda na nov sistem zagotavljanja sredstev.
In the beginning of the period, practically no budget outlays will occur as a result of switching to the new provisioning system.
Vendar pa bodo v najslabšem primeru mogoče, da odhodki v zadnjih letih finančne perspektive dosežejo 300 milijonov EUR letno.
But, in a worst case scenario, as much as EUR 300 million per year is theoretically possible for the later years of the FP.
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da so načrtovani tokovi v okviru razumnih predvidevanj skladni z večletnim finančnim okvirom 2007–2013, kot ga je odobril Parlament, in morajo biti kriti v okviru postavke 4.
The rapporteur concludes that the projected flows, within any reasonable assumptions, are compatible with the MFF 2007-2013 as signed up to by the Parliament and are to be covered in heading 4.
v milijonih EUR
EUR Million
Proračunski prihodki
Budgetary revenues
Proračunske potrebe za običajno zagotavljanje sredstev
Budgetary needs for normal provisioning
Morebitna prilagoditev tržne vrednosti aktive jamstvenega sklada
Possible adjustments in the market valuation of the assets of the Guarantee Fund
Možni vpliv morebitne uporabe jamstva
Potential impact of possible calls
Najvišje proračunske potrebe (v najslabšem primeru)
Maximum budgetary needs (worst-case scenario)
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga Sklepa Sveta o odobritvi jamstva Skupnosti Evropski investicijski banki za izgube pri posojilih in jamstvih za projekte zunaj Skupnosti ( KOM(2006)0324 – 2006/0107(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the Proposal for a Council decision granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and guarantees for projects outside the Community COM(2006)324 – C6-0275/2006 - 2006/0107(CNS) )
Spoštovani gospod Lewandowski,
Dear Mr Lewandowski,
v pismu z dne 27. septembra 2006 ste v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosili za mnenje o točnosti in primernosti pravne podlage zgoraj omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 27 September 2006 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs, pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Zgoraj omenjeno vprašanje je odbor obravnaval na seji dne 2. oktobra 2006.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 2 October 2006.
Kot predsednik Odbora za proračun ste mi, predsedniku Odbora za pravne zadeve, 27. septembra 2006 poslali naslednje pismo:
As Chairman of the Committee for Budgets, you sent me, as Chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee, a letter on 27 September 2006 in the following terms:
"Komisija predlaga člen 181a (gospodarsko, finančno in tehnično sodelovanje s tretjimi državami) kot enotno pravno podlago, ki bi zajela različne regije/države.
"The Commission proposes Article 181a (economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries) as a single legal basis, covering the different regions/countries included.
Države upravičenke so naštete v prilogi 1 predloga.
The eligible countries are listed in annex 1 of the proposal.
Treba bi bilo upoštevati, da je nekaj držav, naštetih v tej uredbi, v skladu s trenutno veljavnimi opredelitvami, zlasti s klasifikacijo organizacije OECD, pravzaprav razvrščenih med države v razvoju.
It should be noted that several of the countries listed under this regulation are in fact classified as developing countries according to the definitions in force, notably OECD classification.
Pravna podlaga bi morala praviloma odražati cilj in vsebino obravnavanega ukrepa, vendar se postavlja vprašanje, ali bi bilo treba za pravno podlago uporabiti tudi člen 179 Pogodbe – Razvojno sodelovanje.
As, normally, the legal basis should reflect the aim and content of the measure at issue, there seems to be a question mark over whether Article 179 of the Treaty -Development Cooperation- should not also be used as a legal basis.
Ker se določbe Pogodbe razlikujejo, tj. za člen 181a je predviden postopek posvetovanja, za člen 179 pa postopek soodločanja, bi to lahko vplivalo na pooblastila Parlamenta."
As the Treaty provisions are different, i.e. consultation for 181a and co-decision for 179, this could have implications for the powers of the Parliament."
V nadaljevanju navajam oceno ustrezne pravne podlage za obravnavani predlog.
An appraisal of the proper legal basis for the proposal in question is set out hereinafter.
Ustrezne določbe Pogodbe ES
The relevant provisions of the EC Treaty
Prvotno je Komisija za edino pravno podlago izbrala člen 181a:
The original sole legal basis selected by the Commission is Article 181a:
Člen 181a spada pod naslov XXI Pogodbe ES – Gospodarsko, finančno in tehnično sodelovanje s tretjimi državami.
Article 181a comes within Title XXI of the EC Treaty, Economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries.
Dodatna pravna podlaga, o kateri je razmišljal poročevalec Odbora za proračun, je člen 179, ki spada pod naslov XX Pogodbe ES – Razvojno sodelovanje:
The additional legal basis contemplated by the Budgets Committee's rapporteur is Article 179, which comes under Title XX of the EC Treaty, Development Cooperation:
Evropska investicijska banka prispeva k izvajanju ukrepov iz prvega odstavka tega člena v skladu s pogoji iz svojega statuta.
The European Investment Bank shall contribute, under the terms laid down in its Statute, to the implementation of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.
Člen 177, na katerega se sklicuje člen 179, se glasi:
Article 177, to which Article 179 refers, is worded as follows:
– trajnostni gospodarski in socialni razvoj držav v razvoju, zlasti tistih, ki so v najbolj neugodnem položaju;
— the sustainable economic and social development of the developing countries, and more particularly the most disadvantaged among them,
– skladno in postopno vključevanje držav v razvoju v svetovno gospodarstvo;
— the smooth and gradual integration of the developing countries into the world economy,
Vsebina predlaganega ukrepa
The content of the proposed measure
Predlog obravnava vlogo EIB kot posojilodajalca v okviru zunanje politike EU.
The proposal has to do with the EIB's role as lender in the context of the EU's foreign policy.
Za preprečevanje negativnih učinkov na bonitetno stopnjo EIB Skupnost jamči za kritje vseh izgub, ki bi nastale kot posledica dajanja posojil zunaj Skupnosti.
In order not to have an adverse effect on the EIB's credit rating, the Community gives a guarantee to cover any losses resulting from lending outside the Community.
Sedanja splošna odločba je bila sprejeta leta 2000 na podlagi člena 308 Pogodbe ES.
The present general decision was adopted in 2000 on the basis of Article 308 of the EC Treaty.
Ob različnih priložnostih je bila spremenjena in dopolnjena (nazadnje na podlagi člena 181a) z namenom uvedbe dodatnih jamstev, ki bi vključevala nove države.
It has been amended and supplemented on various occasions (most recently on the basis of Article 181a) in order to introduce supplementary guarantees covering new countries.
Člen 1 navaja, da bo v obdobju 2007-2013 jamstvo Skupnosti krilo financiranje EIB do višine skupnega zneska 33 milijard EUR, vključno z rezervo v višini 1,5 milijarde EUR.
Article 1 mentions that the Community guarantee will cover EIB financing operations up to a global amount of EUR 33 billion, including a reserve of EUR 1.5 billion, over the period 2007-2013.
Jamstvo bo omejeno na 65 % skupnega zneska financiranja, povišanega za ustrezne zneske.
The guarantee is to be restricted to 65% of the aggregate amount of the financing operations plus related sums.
Skupni najvišji določeni znesek se razdeli po regijah, z naslednjimi zavezujočimi regionalnimi najvišjimi določenimi zneski:
The overall ceiling is to be broken down by region with the following binding regional ceilings:
A) Predpristopne države: 9 milijard EUR
A) Pre-accession countries: EUR 9 billion
B) Sosedske in partnerske države: 15 milijard EUR.
B) Neighbourhood and Partnership countries: EUR 15 billion.
Ta znesek se razdeli na dva okvirna najvišje določena podzneska, tj. za sredozemske države: 10 milijard EUR ter za Vzhodno Evropo, Južni Kavkaz in Rusijo: 5 milijard EUR.
This is broken down into two indicative sub-ceilings, i.e. Mediterranean countries: EUR 10 billion, and Eastern Europe, Southern Caucasus and Russia: EUR 5 billion.
C) Države razvojnega in gospodarskega sodelovanja: 7,5 milijarde EUR, ki se razdelijo na tri okvirne najvišje določene podzneske, za Južno Ameriko: 4 milijarde EUR, za Azijo: 2 milijardi EUR in za Južnoafriško republiko: 1,5 milijard EUR.
C) Development and Economic Cooperation countries: EUR 7.5 billion, broken down into three indicative sub-ceilings, i.e. Latin America: EUR 4 billion, Asia: EUR 2 billion, and Republic of South Africa: EUR 1.5 billion.
D) Rezervni mandat: 1,5 milijard EUR.
D) Reserve Mandate: EUR 1.5 billion.
Člen 2 obravnava seznam držav, na katere se nanaša pravni akt, in njihovo upravičenost.
Article 2 deals with the list of countries concerned by the legal act and their eligibility.
Člen 3 določa, da se rezervni mandat ne dodeli nobeni določeni regiji in da se začne izvajati v primeru naravnih nesreč, za obnovo po spopadih ali razvoj v strateško pomembnih državah.
Article 3 specifies that the Reserve Mandate is not allocated to any single region and will be activated in cases of natural disasters, post-conflict reconstruction or developments in strategically important countries.
Za aktiviranje rezervnega mandata se skupno odločita Komisija in EIB po posvetovanju z EFC.
The activation will be decided jointly by the Commission and the EIB, following consultation with the EFC.
O začetku izvajanja rezervnega mandata se obvesti Evropski parlament.
The European Parliament will be informed about the activation of the Reserve Mandate.
Člen 4 podrobno opisuje zahteve glede povezanosti zunanjih dejavnosti EIB s politikami EU na podlagi tesnejšega sodelovanja med Komisijo in EIB ter izboljšanega poročanja.
Article 4 details the requirements relating to the linkage of EIB external activities with EU policies, through reinforced cooperation between the Commission and the EIB and enhanced reporting.
Financiranje EIB ne bo vključeno v kritje jamstva Skupnosti, če Komisija poda negativno mnenje o takšnem financiranju v okviru postopka, predvidenega v členu 21 statuta EIB.
Furthermore, an EIB Financing Operation will not be included under the cover of the Community guarantee in case the Commission delivers a negative opinion on such operation within the framework of the procedure provided for in Article 21 of the Statutes of the EIB.
Člen 5 podrobno opisuje načine za okrepitev sodelovanja z drugimi mednarodnimi finančnimi institucijami.
Article 5 details the modalities of the enhanced cooperation with other International Financial Institutions.
Člen 6 pojasnjuje naravo jamstva Skupnosti, ki bo krilo politična ali deželna tveganja pri financiranjih, ki jih bo odobrila EIB.
Article 6 clarifies the nature of the Community guarantee which will cover risks of a political or sovereign nature for financing operations entered into by the EIB.
Člen 7 vključuje izboljšano poročanje in zahteve glede računovodskih informacij za EIB in Komisijo.
Article 7 includes enhanced reporting and accounting information requirements for both the EIB and the Commission.
Člen 8 določa pristojnost EIB pri uveljavitvi morebitnih zahtevkov za izterjavo v imenu Komisije.
Article 8 specifies the responsibility of the EIB to pursue possible recovery claims on behalf of the Commission.
Člen 9 navaja, da se bodo podrobne določbe in postopki za jamstvo Skupnosti določili v sporazumu o jamstvu, ki ga skleneta Komisija in EIB.
Article 9 mentions that the detailed provisions and procedures relating to the Community guarantee shall be laid down in a guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB.
Člen 10 navaja, da naj bi vmesni pregled mandata opravila Komisija leta 2010, med drugim na podlagi poročila o dejavnosti EIB in ocene, ki jo pripravi neodvisna ocenjevalna služba EIB.
Article 10 mentions that a mid-term review of the mandate would be carried out in 2010 by the Commission on the basis, inter alia, of an activity report from the EIB as well as an evaluation prepared by the EIB's independent evaluation department.
Preambula vključuje politično ozadje predloga in podroben obseg dejavnosti EIB v različnih regijah.
The preamble includes the political background to the proposal and the detailed scope of EIB operations in the different regions.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti dosledno vztraja pri tem, da "mora v okviru organizacije pooblastil Skupnosti izbira pravne podlage za nek ukrep temeljiti na objektivnih dejavnikih, ki so podvrženi pravni presoji.
The Court of Justice has consistently held that "in the context of the organisation of the powers of the Community the choice of the legal basis for a measure must rest on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review.
Ti dejavniki vključujejo zlasti cilj in vsebino ukrepa. .
Those factors include in particular the aim and the content of the measure .... .
V zvezi s tem so dejstvo, da želi neka institucija pri sprejemanju določenega ukrepa sodelovati v večji meri, opravljeno delo v drugih ozirih na področju dejavnosti, ki jo zajema ukrep, ter okvir, v katerem je bil ukrep sprejet, nepomembni"
In this connection, the fact that an institution wishes to participate more fully in the adoption of a given measure, the work carried out in other respects in the sphere of action covered by the measure and the context in which the measure was adopted are irrelevant"
Primer C-269/97 Komisija proti Svetu [2000] ECR I-2257, odstavka 43 in 44. .
Case C-269/97 Commission v. Council [2000] ECR I-2257, paras 43 and 44. .