natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evropski parlament mora na vsak način obdržati vpliv na strateške smernice, saj so te politične narave in ne le tehnični izvedbeni ukrepi.
It is imperative that the EP keeps influence over the strategic guidelines, since they are of a political nature rather than purely technical implementing measures.
Načeloma mora Parlament vztrajati pri ohranitvi postopka soodločanja iz člena 251 za sprejetje strateških dokumentov.
In principle, the EP should insist that the co-decision procedure of Article 251 be maintained for the adoption of the strategy papers.
Kljub temu je treba Komisiji omogočiti nekaj prilagodljivosti in zato predlagati postopek, na podlagi katerega se odločba o strateških dokumentih sprejme v okviru komitologije, pod pogojem, da se obe instituciji strinjata.
But in order to provide some flexibility for the Commission a procedure is proposed where the strategy papers can be decided upon in comitology, provided that neither of the institutions objects.
To bi pomenilo, da se upošteva zakonodajni postopek le v primeru, če sozakonodajalca močno nasprotujeta osnutkom besedil Komisije.
This would mean that only in case that the draft texts by the Commission meet heavy opposition by the co-legislators, the legislative procedure would have to be followed.
Odstavek 21 a (novo)
Article 21 a (new)
Komisija, v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom iz člena 52, sprejme potrebne ukrepe za izvajanje programa v zvezi z naslednjimi zadevami:
The measures necessary for the implementation of the programme relating to the following matters shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 52:
(a) letni program dela;
(a) the annual work programme;
(b) letni proračun in razporeditev sredstev med različnimi dejavnostmi sklada;
(b) the annual budget and distribution of funds between the various actions of the Fund;
(c) splošne smernice za uporabo sklada in meril ter postopkov izbora;
(c) the general guidelines for implementing the Fund and the selection criteria and procedures;
(d) razporeditev sredstev med dejavnostmi, ki se izvedejo prek ustreznih nacionalnih organov;
(d) the distribution of funds among the actions to be managed through the corresponding national authorities;
(e) ukrepi za spremljanje in ocenjevanje dejavnosti ter širjenje in prenos rezultatov;
(e) the arrangements for monitoring and evaluating the actions and for the dissemination and transfer of results;
(f) predlogi za izbor projektov.
(f) the proposals for project selection.
Zaradi ločevanja med tehničnimi prilagoditvami v odborih in politično občutljivimi spremembami, ki jih opravita sozakonodajalca Evropski parlament in Svet, je treba uvesti člen o izvedbenih ukrepih.
An article on the implementing measures has to be introduced in order to separate technical adaptation via committees from political sensitive change, to be done by the co-legislators EP / Council.
Svetovalni postopek v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 468/1999 je običajni pristop Odbora za proračun za zagotovitev učinkovitih in hitrih postopkov.
The traditional approach of the Committee on Budgets is the advisory procedure pursuant to Council Decision 468/1999 in order to assure efficient and speedy procedures.
Predlogi Komisije za izbor projektov se zaradi preglednosti lahko predložijo odboru.
The Commission proposals for project selection may be submitted to the Committee for transparency reasons.
Člen 30, odstavek 1, točka (b)
Article 30, paragraph 1, point (b)
(b) zagotoviti, da se revizije ukrepov izvajajo na podlagi ustreznega vzorca, da se preveri prijavljen izdatek; vzorec predstavlja najmanj 10% skupnih upravičenih izdatkov za vsak letni program;
(b) ensure that audits are carried out on actions on the basis of an appropriate sample to verify expenditure declared; the sample shall represent at least 10% of the total eligible expenditure for each annual programme;
(b) zagotoviti, da se revizije ukrepov izvajajo na podlagi ustreznega vzorca, da se preveri prijavljen izdatek; vzorec predstavlja najmanj 20% skupnih upravičenih izdatkov za vsak letni program;
(b) ensure that audits are carried out on actions on the basis of an appropriate sample to verify expenditure declared; the sample shall represent at least 20% of the total eligible expenditure for each annual programme;
Člen 49, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 49, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Komisija zagotovi predhodno oceno, spremljanje in naknadno oceno ukrepov, ki jih zajema ta odločba.
The Commission shall ensure that the actions covered by this Decision are subject to prior evaluation, monitoring and ex post evaluation.
Zagotovi tudi dostopnost ter pregledno izvajanje programa.
It shall ensure that the programme is accessible and is implemented in a transparent manner.
Program je treba v ustreznih obdobjih spremljati in ocenjevati, da se zagotovi demokratičen nadzor.
The programme needs to be monitored and evaluated at the appropriate times, so as to ensure democratic scrutiny.
Za zagotavljanje učinkovitega spremljanja in ocenjevanja programa bi morali obe veji proračunskega organa redno in pravočasno prejemati podatke.
The two arms of the budgetary authority should receive regular and early information in order to ensure that the programme is monitored and assessed in an effectively
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij predloži: poročilo o naknadnem vrednotenju, najkasneje do 31. decembra 2012 (za obdobje 2008–2010) in do 31. decembra 2015 (za obdobje 2011–2013).
The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: no later than 31 December 2012 for the period 2008-2010 and 31 December 2015 for the period 2011-2013 respectively, an ex post evaluation report.
(a) vmesno poročilo o doseženih rezultatih in o kakovostnih in kvantitativnih vidikih izvrševanja Sklada, skupaj s predlogom o prihodnjem razvoju Sklada, najkasneje do ...*.
(a) no later than ...*, an intermediate report on the results achieved and on qualitative and quantitative aspects of implementation of the Fund, having regard to its objectives, together with a proposal on the Fund’s future development.
Poleg tega Komisija letno predstavi kratko poročilo o spremljanju izvrševanja Sklada;
Moreover the Commission shall present annually a short report monitoring the situation of the implementation of the Fund;
(b) poročilo o naknadnem vrednotenju izvajanja in rezultatov programa ob zaključku njegovega izvajanja , najkasneje do 31. decembra 2012 (za obdobje 2008–2010) in do 31. decembra 2015 (za obdobje 2011–2013).
(b) no later than 31 December 2012 (for the period 2008-2010) and 31 December 2015 (for the period 2011-2013) respectively, an ex post evaluation report covering the implementation and results of the programme, on completion of its implementation.
* Tri leta po sprejetju te odločbe.
* Three years after the adoption of this Decision.
Pomembno je zagotoviti demokratični nadzor s pomočjo spremljanja in ocenjevanja sklada v primernem času.
The fund needs to be monitored and evaluated at the appropriate times, so as to ensure democratic scrutiny.
Člen 51, odstavek 2
Article 51, paragraph 2
Poročilo se šteje za sprejemljivo, če vsebuje vse podatke iz odstavka 1 .
The reports shall be judged acceptable where they contain all the information listed in paragraph 1 .
Komisija v roku dveh mesecev sprejme odločbo o vsebini letnega poročila o izvajanju, ki ga predloži odgovorni organ.
The Commission shall reach a decision on the content of the annual report on implementation submitted by the responsible authority within two months.
Člen 52, odstavka 1 in 2
Article 52, paragraphs 1 and 2
Komisiji pri delu pomaga skupni odbor „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“, ki ga je ustanovila Odločba o ustanovitvi Sklada za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ ../… („odbor“)
The Commission shall be assisted by the common Committee “Solidarity and Management of Migration flows” , established by the Decision establishing the External Borders Fund for the period 2007-2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ ../… (the “committee”).
Komisiji pri delu pomaga skupni odbor „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ ../… („odbor“).
The Commission shall be assisted by the common Committee “Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows” established for the period 2007-2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’../… (the “committee”).
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek veljata člena 4 in 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES ob upoštevanju določb člena 8 Sklepa .
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof .
Dokler Svet ne sprejme odločitve o predlogu Komisije, ki se nanaša na reformo ureditve komitologije, predstavlja svetovalni postopek v skladu s členom 3 in 7 Odločbe Sveta 1999/468/ES v Odboru za proračun standardni pristop za zagotovitev učinkovitih in transparentnih postopkov komitologije.
Awaiting a decision by the Council on the proposal of the Commission concerning the reform of the comitology regime, the advisory procedure pursuant to Article 3 and 7 of Council decision 1999/468/CE is the Committee on Budgets’ standard approach to ensuring that comitology procedures is effective and transparent.
Komisija lahko izvede vmesni pregled odločbe do konca 2010, da izboljša izvrševanje Sklada.
The Commission may submit this Decision for a mid-term review by the end of 2010 in order to improve implementation of the Fund.
Predlog Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 - 2013 as part of the General programme "Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows"
Pripravljavka mnenja Datum imenovanja:
Draftswoman Date appointed
Predlog Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008-2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’
o nadaljevanju trajnostne uporabe virov: Tematska strategija o preprečevanju in recikliranju odpadkov
A Thematic Strategy on the recycling of waste
o nadaljevanju trajnostne uporabe virov: Tematska strategija o preprečevanju in recikliranju odpadkov
A Thematic Strategy on recycling of waste
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru ter Odboru regij o nadaljevanju trajnostne uporabe virov: Tematska strategija o preprečevanju in recikliranju odpadkov" ( KOM(2005)0666 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on 'Taking sustainable use of resources forward: A thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste' ( COM(2005)0666 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 2 in 6 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je treba zahteve varstva okolja vključiti v različne sektorje politike Skupnosti, s ciljem pospeševanja okoljsko trajnostnega razvoja gospodarskih dejavnosti,
– having regard to Articles 2 and 6 of the EC Treaty, by virtue of which environmental protection requirements must be integrated into the various sectors of Community policy with the aim of promoting an environmentally sustainable development of economic activities,
– ob upoštevanju člena 175 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 175 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1600/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002 o šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti
– having regard to Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije o Tematski strategiji o trajnostni rabi naravnih virov ( KOM(2005)0670 ),
– having regard to the Commission's communication on 'A thematic strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources" ( COM(2005)0670 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o sporočilu Komisije z naslovom "Na poti k tematski strategiji za preprečevanje nastajanja in recikliranje odpadkov",
– having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on the communication from the Commission: 'Towards a thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste'
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. novembra 2003 o poročilu o nadaljnjem spremljanju o Direktivi Sveta 75/442/EGS (okvirna direktiva o odpadkih)
– having regard to its resolution of 19 November 2003 on the follow-up report on Council Directive 75/442/EEC (Waste Framework Directive)
UL C 87E, 7.4.2004, str.
OJ C 87E, 7.4.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. novembra 1996 o sporočilu Komisije o reviziji strategije Skupnosti za ravnanje z odpadki ter osnutku resolucije Sveta o politiki ravnanja z odpadki
– having regard to its resolution of 14 November 1996 on the communication from the Commission on the review of the Community strategy for waste management and the draft Council resolution on waste policy
UL C 362, 2.12.1996, str.
OJ C 362, 2.12.1996, p.
241. in resolucije Sveta z dne 24. februarja 1997 o strategiji Skupnosti za ravnanje z odpadki
241. and to the Council Resolution of 24 February 1997 on a Community strategy for waste management
UL C 76, 11.3.1997, str.
OJ C 76, 11.3.1997, p.
– ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti v zadevah C-203/96, C-365/97, C-209/98, C-418/99, C-419/99, C-9/00, C-228/00, C-458/00, C-416/02 in C-121/03,
– having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, particularly in Cases C-203/96, C-365/97, C-209/98, C-418/99, C-419/99, C-9/00, C-228/00, C-458/00, C-416/02 and C-121/03,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0438/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0438/2006 ),
A. ker so v členu 8 šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa Skupnosti zelo jasno opredeljeni cilji in načela politike EU glede ravnanja z odpadki,
A. whereas Article 8 of the 6 th EAP has set very clear objectives, targets and principles for EU waste policy,
B. ker sta v točki (iv) člena 8(2) šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa Skupnosti predvidena razvoj ali revizija direktiv o gradbenih odpadkih in odpadkih pri rušenju objektov, blatu iz čistilnih naprav in biorazgradljivih odpadkih,
B. whereas Article 8(2), point (iv) of the 6 th EAP provides for the development or revision of the directives on construction and demolition waste, sewage sludge and biodegradable wastes,
C. ker kljub nekaterim uspehom, ki so bili doseženi s politiko EU glede ravnanja z odpadki v preteklih 30 letih, ostajajo nerešeni naslednji problemi:
C. whereas, despite some successes achieved by the waste policy of the EU in the past 30 years, the following problems remain:
E. ker je nujno treba spremeniti sedanji ustroj proizvodnje in potrošnje; ker je glavni cilj usmerjati potrošnjo v trajnost, postopke pridobivanja surovin, proizvodnje in načrtovanja izdelkov pa čim bolj uskladiti z naravnimi procesi in vzorci,
E. whereas a transformation of the present system of production and consumption is urgently needed; whereas the main objective is to change consumption in a sustainable direction and bring the processes of raw material extraction, production and product design as much into line with natural processes and designs as possible,
F. ker lahko boljše razumevanje delovanja naravnih sistemov in strukturiranje gospodarstva po bioloških načelih koristita okolju in hkrati predstavljata osnovno izhodišče;
F. whereas an enhanced understanding of how natural systems work and of structuring business along biological lines can improve both the environment and establish the bottom line,
G. ker je pospeševanje bolj celostnih in sistematičnih praks, kot so na primer povezovanje proizvodnje, funkcionalno mišljenje (spreminjanje proizvodov v storitve), dematerializacija in tehnološki razvoj na osnovi posnemanja narave sredstvo za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov,
G. whereas promotion of more integrated and systems-based practices, such as for instance the clustering of production, functional thinking (turning products into services), dematerialisation and technology development based on imitating nature is a means to prevent waste generation,
Cilji razvijajoče se politike EU o ravnanju z odpadki
Aims of an evolving EU policy on waste
H. ker je odlaganje, zlasti na odlagališča, v večini držav članic še vedno najbolj pogost način ravnanja z odpadki,
H. whereas in most Member States disposal, in particular landfill, is still the most common form of waste treatment,
I. ker lahko preprečevanje, ponovna uporaba, recikliranje in energetska predelava odpadkov – ta vrstni red odraža njihovo ustreznost – ohranja naravne vire,
I. whereas prevention, re-use, recycling and energy recovery of waste - with the order reflecting the degree of relevance – can save natural resources,
J. ker cilji Skupnosti in nacionalni cilji na področju preprečevanja niso bili nikoli doseženi, čeprav je preprečevanje še vedno najpomembnejši cilj;
J. whereas Community and national prevention targets have never been achieved, although prevention is still the most important objective;
K. ker ne obstajajo ustrezni minimalni standardi Skupnosti, ki bi veljali za veliko število naprav za predelavo in recikliranje, kar povzroča različne ravni varstva okolja v državah članicah, "ekodamping" in izkrivljanje konkurence,
K. whereas there are no adequate Community minimum standards applying to many recovery and recycling facilities, which results in different levels of environmental protection in the Member States, eco-dumping and distortions of competition,
2. poudarja, da je odločilni cilj ravnanja z odpadki doseganje visoke ravni varstva okolja in zdravja ljudi, ne pa pospeševanje delovanja notranjega trga za predelavo odpadkov;
Stresses the substantial aim for waste management of achieving a high level of protection of the environment and human health rather than facilitating the functioning of the internal market for waste recovery;
Glavni ukrepi
Main actions
4.1 Poenostavitev in posodobitev veljavne zakonodaje
4.1 Simplification and modernisation of existing legislation
9. poudarja, da bi morala biti uporaba postopka komitologije omejena zgolj na nepolitične odločitve, zlasti tiste, ki so tehnične in znanstvene narave;
Emphasises that the use of the commitology procedure should be limited to non-political decisions, especially those of a technical and scientific nature;
91. (direktiva o sežiganju odpadkov);
91. (the waste incineration directive) should apply;
Komisijo poziva k reviziji direktive o sežiganju odpadkov, da bi se vzpostavili enaki okoljski standardi (za emisije in energetsko učinkovitost) tako za sežiganje kot za sosežiganje;
Expresses strong reservations on the proposed energy efficiency calculation method, and the fact that it is to apply to municipal waste incinerators only; calls on the Commission to revise the waste incineration directive, in order to set equal environmental standards (for emissions and energy efficiency) for both incineration and co-incineration of waste;
4.2 Uvedba koncepta življenjskega cikla v politiki ravnanja z odpadki
4.2 Introducing life-cycle thinking in waste policy
– recikliranje materialov;
– material recycling;
– drugi postopki predelave, npr. energetska predelava;
– other recovery operations, for example energy recovery;
kot splošnega pravila za ravnanje z odpadki pri doseganju cilja, da se zmanjša nastajanje odpadkov ter škodljivih vplivov na zdravje in okolje zaradi nastajanja odpadkov in ravnanja z njimi;
as a general rule of waste management in achieving the aim of reducing the generation of waste as well as the adverse impacts on health and the environment resulting from waste generation and management;
4.3 Izboljšanje temeljnega znanja
4.3 Improving the knowledge base
4.4 Preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov
4.4 Waste prevention
20. opozarja na medsebojno vplivanje strategij za ravnanje z odpadki in drugih strategij, zlasti trajnostne uporabe naravnih virov, trajnostnega razvoja in integrirane politike do proizvodov;
Draws attention to the interaction between waste strategies and other strategies, particularly the sustainable use of natural resources, sustainable development and integrated product policy;
UL L 257, 10.10.1996, str.
OJ L 257, 10.10.1996, p.
26. (direktiva IPPC), in v te dokumente vključi ustrezna navodila;
26. (the IPPC Directive) and to include relevant guidance in these documents;
- vzpostavitvijo akreditacije centrov za ponovno uporabo odpadkov;
- setting up an accreditation for re-use centres;
- uvedbo znižane stopnje DDV za izdelke, prodane v centrih za ponovno uporabo;
- introducing a reduced VAT rate on products sold by accredited re-use centres;
- pripravo načrta za izdelavo standardov ponovne uporabe na ravni EU;
- development of a road-map to elaborate re-use standards at EU level;
- zagotavljanjem nadzora nad dejavnostmi ponovne uporabe in poročanja o njih;
- ensuring monitoring and reporting on re-use activities;
4.6 K evropski družbi recikliranja
4.6 Towards a European recycling society
– od leta 2010 prepoved odlaganja odpadkov, ki niso bili predhodno obdelani in pri katerih lahko določeni deli fermentirajo;
– from 2010, a ban on landfill of non-pretreated waste with fermentable components;
– od leta 2015 prepoved odlaganja papirja, kartona, stekla, tekstila, lesa, plastike, kovine, gume, plute, lončenine, betona, opeke in ploščic;
– from 2015, a ban on landfill of paper, cardboard, glass, textiles, wood, plastics, metals, rubber, cork, pottery, concrete, brick and tiles;
– od leta 2020 prepoved odlaganja vseh odpadkov, ki jih je možno reciklirati;
– from 2020, a ban on landfill of all recyclable waste;
33. meni, da Uredba ES št. 1013/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o pošiljkah odpadkov
Considers that Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste
UL L 190, 12.7.2006, str.
OJ L 190, 12.7.2006, p.
1. uvaja pravne obveznosti Baselske konvencije ZN in sklepe OECD; podpira preprečevanje ekodampinga in lažne predelave ter poudarja, da je cilj urejanja pošiljk odpadkov izboljšati ponovno uporabo in recikliranje odpadkov za visoko raven varstva okolja in zdravja ljudi;
1. implements legal obligations from the UN Basel Convention and OECD Decisions; supports the prevention of eco-dumping and sham recovery and underlines that an objective of regulating shipments of waste is to enhance the re-use and recycling of waste ensuring a high level of environmental and human health protection;
Decembra 2005 je Komisija Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu predložila Tematsko strategijo o preprečevanju in recikliranju odpadkov skupaj s predlogom za spremembo Okvirne direktive o odpadkih.
In December 2005 the Commission submitted a Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste to the Council and the European Parliament, along with a proposal for revision of the Waste Framework Directive.
Strategija izhaja iz šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa Skupnosti (julij 2002) in sledi sklepom Sveta in sklepom Parlamenta iz aprila 2004, ki so odgovor na sporočilo Komisije.
The strategy stems from the Sixth Environment Action Programme (July 2002) and follows from the Council's conclusions and Parliament's conclusions of April 2004 in response to a communication from the Commission.