natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ta horizontalni ukrep Skupnosti bo prispeval: a) k spremljanju napredka in proizvodnje grozdja/vina vseh kakovostnih razredov, b) k večji preglednosti označevanja kraja geografskega porekla vina in njegovega lokalnega značaja, c) k možnosti izvajanja nadzora nad spremljanjem prehranjevalne verige, t.j. sledljivosti itd., d) k učinkovitemu in preglednemu poenotenju kategorij vin ter dobremu upravljanju destilacije v kriznem obdobju, e) k vsestranskemu obveščanju potrošnikov.
This horizontal Community measure will contribute: (a) to monitoring the progress and production of grapes/wine of all quality categories; (b) increasing the transparency of the indications of place of geographical origin of wine and its local character; (c) the possibility of carrying out controls monitoring the food chain, i.e. traceability etc.; (d) the effective and transparent unification of wine categories and the sound management of crisis distillation; (e) comprehensive consumer information.
Nove prilagoditve registra vinogradov bodo pripravile države članice, financiral jih bo Evropski kmetijski usmerjevalni in jamstveni sklad (EKUJS), spremljala pa jih bo Komisija.
Fresh adjustments of the wine register will be drawn up by Member States and funded by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and monitored by the Commission.
Subvencija za mošt, ki se uporablja za obogatitev, je privedla do umetne razširitve ukrepa in povzročila intenzivnejše gojenje v nekaterih vinogradih.
The subsidisation of must used for enrichment has led to an artificial extension of the measure and resulted in the intensification of farming in some vineyards.
Padec cen sladkorja neizogibno vodi do povečanja subvencij za mošt, zato da se ohrani ravnotežje med različnimi tehnikami za povečanje vsebnosti alkohola.
A fall in sugar prices leads inevitably to an increase in subsidies for must so that the balance between the various techniques for increasing alcohol content can be maintained.
Predlog Komisije za istočasno ukinitev uporabe saharoze in subvencij za mošt, ki predstavljajo 13 % proračuna za vino, je korak v pravo smer.
The Commission’s proposal for the simultaneous abolition of the use of saccharose and must subsidies - which account for 13 % of the wine budget - is a step in the right direction.
Javno poseganje na področje alkohola – zasebno skladiščenje vina in mošta
J. Public alcohol intervention - private storage of wine and must
Zasebno skladiščenje vina in mošta predstavlja začasni ukrep umika, ki ima stabilizacijski učinek na cene, ki jih ohranja na sprejemljivi ravni v mesecih, ko se izvajajo sklenjene pogodbe.
The private storage of wine and must constitutes a provisional withdrawal measure which has a stabilising effect on prices which it maintains at an acceptable level during the months covered by the agreements concluded.
Analize kažejo, da je ta ukrep kljub temu, da ni zelo drag (predstavlja približno 5 % celotne porabe skupne tržne ureditve), v preteklosti olajšal absorpcijo in trženje proizvodnje, ne pa skladiščenja vina slabe kakovosti, namenjenega destilaciji.
Analyses show that, although this measure is not very expensive (it accounts for approximately 5 % of total CMO spending), it has in the past facilitated the absorption and marketing of production rather than the storage of poor quality wine earmarked for distillation.
Trgovanje in pogajanje v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji (STO) – oblikovanje pravil
L. Trade and negotiations in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Drafting rules
Pogajanja v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji (STO) postavljajo določene ukrepe skupne kmetijske politike v težek položaj, zlasti tiste, ki se nanašajo na trge iz "oranžne škatle".
Negotiations in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) put various CAP measures in a difficult position, in particular those concerning Amber Box markets.
Zato je posebej zaželeno, da se vsaj velik delež teh sredstev Skupnosti preusmeri na politike in ukrepe, ki jih mednarodni partnerji EU ne bodo kritizirali kot intervencijske ukrepe na trgu in ki bodo lahko prispevali k smotrnemu upravljanju vinskega sektorja.
It is therefore particularly desirable that at least a significant share of these Community funds should be redirected to policies and measures which cannot be criticised as market intervention measures by the EU’s international partners, but can contribute to the rational management of the wine sector.
Še posebej bi bilo zanimivo preučevati posredne ukrepe podpore trga in dohodkov v kriznih obdobjih na trgu na modelu varnostne mreže, ki ga že uporabljajo države "novega sveta".
It is particularly interesting to investigate indirect market and income support measures in times of market crisis, on the model of the safety net already applied by ‘New World’ countries.
Po drugi strani je treba za okrepitev položaja vinskega sektorja v celotni politiki Skupnosti in za zaščito izdelkov z geografskimi označbami v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) oblikovati integrirano politiko, ki bo ohranila nacionalne in regionalne posebnosti ter hkrati na mednarodni ravni utrdila in uveljavila politiko in strategijo Skupnosti za spodbujanje proizvodnje varnih izdelkov visoke kakovosti, vključno z vinom.
On the other hand, in order to strengthen the position of the wine sector in Community policy as a whole so as to safeguard products with geographical indications within the framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), an integrated policy should be formulated which safeguards national and regional particularities, but also safeguards and highlights showcases at international level the Community’s policy and strategy for encouraging the production of high quality and safe products, including wine.
Treba se je zavedati, da ukinitev prepovedi vinifikacije uvoženega mošta predstavlja enega od največjih tveganj, ki lahko privede do denaturacije proizvodnje vina, izkrivljanja trga in zmanjšanja proizvodnje Skupnosti, zato mora Komisija ta sporazum zavrniti.
It should be borne in mind that lifting the ban on vinification using imported must - an agreement on which must be prevented by the Commission within the WTO - is a major source of risk as regards the adulteration of wine production, the distortion of the market and the contraction of Community production.
Prav tako bi bilo zanimivo vedeti, zakaj je Komisija načela to vprašanje v svojih predlogih, ne da bi jo k temu pozvale tretje države.
It is also worth wondering why the Commission raised this issue in its proposals without having received any substantive request by third countries in this connection.
Poleg tega je treba poudariti, da se v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji (STO) ni obvezno pogajati o uvozu vin iz tretjih držav in možnosti njihovega mešanja z vini iz Skupnosti, zato je jasno, da se je treba takšnemu poteku dogajanj izogniti, saj bi to povzročilo zelo velike probleme v zvezi z izvorom in identifikacijo vin, ki pridejo do potrošnikov.
It should also be pointed out that there is no obligation to negotiate in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in respect of imports of third country wines and the blending of these wines with Community wines, and such a development must clearly be avoided, since it will create enormous problems as regards the origin, and identification of the wines reaching consumers.
Eno od vprašanj, ki jih je treba načeti in temeljito proučiti, je razvrstitev vin.
One of the issues which must be addressed and examined extensively is the classification of wines.
Do nedavnega so potrošniki ločevali in izbirali med kakovostnimi vini, proizvedenimi v določenih območjih, in namiznimi vini, danes pa s spremembo okusa potrošnikov, širitvijo trgovskih verig in povečanjem uvoza vin iz držav "novega sveta" razlikovanje temelji na kakovostnih vinih, proizvedenih v določenih območjih, in sortah grozdja, iz katerega so vina narejena.
While consumers have until recently been faced with a distinction between quality wines produced in specific regions (QWpsr) and table wines, today, with shifts in consumer preferences, the extension of commercial chains and an increase in imports of wine from ‘New World’ countries, the distinction is now based on quality wines produced in specific regions (QWPSR) and the variety of grape from which the wine is produced.
Zato bi bilo treba na ravni Skupnosti predvideti možnost, da se na nalepkah za namizna vina navedejo sorte grozdja in trgatev, kar bi namizno vino naredilo bolj tržno prepoznavno in bi preprečilo nelojalno konkurenco med različnimi kategorijami vin na trgu Skupnosti.
Consideration should therefore be given at Community level to the possibility of mentioning the grape variety and vintage on the labels of table wines so as to confer on them greater commercial ‘recognisability’ and so as to prevent unfair competition between the various categories of wine in the Community market.
NACIONALNI VIRI – ENOTNE POLITIKE SKUPNOSTI, KI TEMELJIJO NA PROGRAMU PODPORE IN RAZVOJA VINSKEGA SEKTORJA
NATIONAL ENVELOPES - UNIFORM COMMUNITY POLICIES BASED ON A SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME FOR THE WINE SECTOR (SDPW)
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito, ciljno in nadzorovano izvajanje tržnih ukrepov ter strukturne posege na nacionalni in regionalni ravni, je treba oblikovati programe podpore in razvoja vinskega sektorja, ki bodo določali nacionalne prednostne naloge, temelječe na enotnih politikah Skupnosti.
In order to ensure the effective, targeted and controlled application of market measures and structural interventions to be implemented at national and regional level, programmes for the Support and Development of the wine sector (PSDWs) must be established setting out national priorities based on uniform Community policies.
Če se bodo države članice zaradi neobstoja ureditvenega okvira odločile za nacionalne posege, bo to pomenilo nacionalizacijo sektorja in, posredno, skupne kmetijske politike (SKP), kar je treba preprečiti.
If Member States choose national interventions in the absence of a Community regulatory framework, this would signal the nationalisation of the sector and, indirectly, of the common agricultural policy, (CAP) itself, an outcome which must be avoided.
5. meni, da se reforma ne bi smela osredotočiti le na krčenje vinogradov, kajti z izgubo proizvodnega potenciala EU, ki omogoča uravnavanje ponudbe in povpraševanja, bi EU izgubila svoj tržni delež v odnosu do zunanje konkurence, medtem ko se konkurenčnost evropskih vin na mednarodnih trgih s tem ne bi izboljšala;
Considers that the main focus of the reform should not be the grubbing-up of vineyards, since the loss of EU production potential making it possible to regulate supply and demand would result in the EU losing its market share to external competitors, while doing nothing to improve the competitiveness of European wines on international markets;
7. ugotavlja, da v Evropi, zlasti v državah, ki so tradicionalne porabnice vina, poraba vina nenehno upada, kar je glavni vzrok za strukturni presežek vina; ugotavlja, da izvoz vina v zadnjih letih zastaja, uvoz pa dinamično narašča, zaradi česar je nujno, da postane evropski vinogradniški sektor bolj konkurenčen; poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma predloži poročilo o vzrokih za upad izvoza evropskih vin v zadnjih letih in nenehno rast uvoza iz tretjih držav, ter da še posebej natančno prikaže, v kakšnem obsegu se izvajajo dvostranski trgovinski sporazumi s tretjimi državami, upoštevajo legitimni trgovinski interesi EU in evropskih proizvajalcev ter ali se v odgovor na te probleme ustrezno uporabljajo mehanizmi skupne trgovinske politike;
Notes that there has been a steady drop in wine consumption in Europe, mainly in the traditional wine consuming countries, which is one of the causes of the structural surplus of wine; notes that in recent years exports of wine have stagnated, while imports have grown dynamically, making it vital that the European wine-growing sector becomes more competitive; asks the Commission to submit a report directly explaining the reasons for the fall in European wine exports in recent years and the dynamic growth in imports from third countries, specifying in particular the extent to which bilateral trading agreements with third countries have been implemented, the account taken of the legitimate trading interests of the EU and European producers and the appropriate use made of common trading policy mechanisms in response to these problems;
10. meni, da je potrebno v pogajanjih v okviru STO in dvostranskih sporazumih zagotoviti boljšo zaščito zaščitenih geografskih označb (ZGO) in zaščitenega geografskega porekla (ZGP), kar bo občutno prispevalo k ohranjanju kakovostne proizvodnje vina v povezavi z lokalnimi območji in praksami;
Considers it necessary to secure better protection of protected geographical indications (PGI) and protected designations of origin (PDO) within the framework of the WTO negotiations and bilateral agreements, as a major contribution to maintaining quality wine production linked to local areas and practices;
12. poudarja, da mora zunanjetrgovinska politika za evropska vina vključevati sklepanje dvostranskih sporazumov o trgovini z vinom s tretjimi državami na osnovi vzajemnega priznavanja in zaščite geografskih označb;
Stresses the need, as part of this external trade policy for European wines, to conclude bilateral agreements with third countries on the wine trade, on the basis of mutual recognition and protection of geographical indications;
15. opozarja Komisijo, da se o uvozu vin iz neevropskih držav in mešanju teh vin z evropskimi vini ni obvezno pogajati s STO; poudarja, da Komisija ne sme ustvarjati obvez, ki jih STO ne nalaga;
Reminds the Commission that there is no obligation to negotiate in the WTO in respect of imports of wines from non-European countries and the blending of those wines with European wines; stresses that the Commission must not create obligations that the WTO does not impose;
17. poziva k ustanovitvi evropskega vinogradniškega observatorija, ki bo dolžan usklajevati znanja o vinogradih (proizvodni potencial, spremembe v sestavi) in zagotavljati, da bodo o trendih porabe ter vinogradniških in enoloških praksah potekale visoko kakovostne evropske raziskave.
Calls for the setting up of a European wine-growing observatory, which will be responsible for coordinating knowledge of vineyards (production potential, changes in composition) and ensure that high-quality European research is undertaken into trends in consumption, wine-growing practices and oenological practices.
Reforma skupne ureditve trga za vino
Reform of the common organisation of the market in wine
o reformi skupne ureditve trga za vino
on the reform of the common organisation of the market in wine
Odbor za regionalni razvoj poziva Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. meni, da mora vsaka reforma upoštevati dejstvo, da je vinski sektor glavni vir delovnih mest in blaginje v številnih regijah EU ter da je kakovost pridelave vina v EU vodilna v svetu; verjame, da se mora vsaka reforma osredotočiti na ohranjanje prevladujočega položaja pridelovalcev vina iz EU; nadalje meni, da se je treba za vsako ceno izogniti kakršnemu koli koraku k ponovni nacionalizaciji SKP s pomočjo nacionalnih virov, kot je predlagano v sporočilu Komisije z dne 22. junija 2006;
Considers that any reform must take due account of the fact that the wine sector is the principal source of employment and prosperity in a number of EU regions and that the quality of EU wine production is world leading; believes that any reform must focus on how to maintain the dominant position of EU wine producers; further believes that any step towards re-nationalisation of the CAP by means of national envelopes, as considered in the Commission’s communication of 22 June 2006, should be avoided at all costs.
5 poudarja, da je treba proračun Skupnosti ohraniti v zdajšnjih okvirih in ne prenašati sredstev iz prvega stebra SKP v drugi, ki zadeva razvoj podeželja, kar bi lahko privedlo do razpršitve sredstev v škodo vinskega sektorja; zahteva, da so financirani ukrepi jasno določeni, zato da bodo sredstva dejansko uporabljena v vinskemu sektorju;
5 Stresses the need to maintain the Community budget and not transfer funds from the first pillar to the second pillar of the CAP, which concerns rural development, since this might result in the dilution of resources at the expense of the wine sector; demands that measures eligible for funding be clearly specified, so as to guarantee that funds are in fact used for the wine sector.
7. poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga ukrepe za posodobitev tehnik evropske pridelave vina, metod trženja in označevanja ter za povečanje povpraševanja potrošnikov; meni, da bi v okviru liberalizacije enoloških praks, ki jo priporoča Komisija zaradi spoštovanja mednarodnih obveznosti EU, bila prepoved obogatitve s sladkorjem za proizvajalce Skupnosti v nasprotju s težnjo po konkurenčnosti vinskega sektorja EU ter bi povzročila neke vrste diskriminacijo v nasprotni smeri, težko razumljivo za vinogradnike EU;
Calls on the Commission to propose measures to modernise European wine production techniques, marketing methods and labelling and improve consumer demand; considers – in the context of the liberalisation of wine-making practices supported by the Commission in light of the EU’s international obligations – that banning Community producers from using sugar enrichment would run counter to the aim of achieving competitiveness for the EU’s wine sector and would create a form of reverse discrimination which EU wine-growers would find impossible to understand.
9. meni, da je, kljub potrebnimi spremembami, treba ohraniti režim krizne destilacije vin, kakor tudi poseben režim za destilacije, namenjene trgu, ki zagotavljajo stalno preskrbo industrije žganih pijač z vinskih alkoholom; poudarja koristno vlogo, ki jo ima destilacija pitnega alkohola pri ohranjanju proizvodne mreže v nekaterih regijah Evropske unije;
Considers that crisis distillation arrangements should remain in place, albeit with the necessary changes, as should a second differentiated scheme providing for market-oriented distillation to guarantee a continuous supply of vinous alcohol to the spirit drink industry; points out that potable alcohol distillation plays a useful role in maintaining the fabric of production in certain regions of the Union.
10 predlaga, da mora biti vsaka reforma uvedena postopoma, z določbami za prehodna obdobja ter stalnim ocenjevanjem učinkov reforme na gospodarsko in socialno stanje regij EU;
10 Proposes that any reform be implemented progressively, with provision being made for transitional periods as well as continuous evaluation of the effects of the reform on the economic and social situation of the regions of the Union.
13. zahteva, da pri svojem predlogu za reformo skupne ureditve trga Komisija upošteva dejstvo, da vinski sektor sodi na področje strategije za razvoj podeželja, saj prispeva k trajnostnemu razvoju regij, poleg tega pa je večina delovnih mest, ki jih ustvari vinski sektor, na podeželju; zato zahteva, da so jasno navedene vse dejavnosti za razvoj podeželja, ki jih financira skupna ureditev trga za vinski sektor, da bi se tako preprečila poraba sredstev za druge namene, če ni dvojnega financiranja.
Asks the Commission to take into account in its proposal for reform of the CMO the fact that the wine sector falls within the scope of the rural development strategy since it contributes to the sustainable development of the regions and most of the jobs generated by the wine sector are carried out in rural areas; calls, therefore, for all rural development actions funded by the CMO for the wine sector to be clearly listed, so as to prevent funds from being used for other purposes, provided that there is not double funding.
Reforma skupne ureditve trga za vino
The reform of the common organisation of the market in wine
o predlogu odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 68/89/EGS o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi s klasifikacijo neobdelanega lesa
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 68/89/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the member States concerning the classification of wood in the rough
Poenostavljeni postopek – člen 43(1) poslovnika
Simplified Procedure - Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure
PE 382.582v01-00
PE 382.582v02-00
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0557 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0557 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0325/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0325/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6‑0017/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0017/2007 ),
Predlog odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 68/89/EGS o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi s klasifikacijo neobdelanega lesa
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 68/89/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the member States concerning the classification of wood in the rough
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitivi Direktive Sveta 71/304/EGS z dne 26. julija 1971 o odpravi omejitev svobode opravljanja storitev pri javnih naročilih za gradnje in omejitev pri oddaji javnih naročil za gradnje izvajalcem, ki delajo prek zastopstev ali podružnic
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 71/304/EEC of 26 July 1971 concerning the abolition of restrictions on freedom to provide services in respect of public works contracts and on the award of public works contracts to contractors acting through agencies or branches
Poenostavljeni postopek - člen 43(1) poslovnika
Simplified Procedure - Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure
PE 382.602v01-00
PE 382.602v02-00
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0748 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0748 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 47(2), 55 in 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0440/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 47(2), 55 and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0440/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 51 in 43(1) poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6‑0018/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0018/2007 ),
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitivi Direktive Sveta 71/304/EGS z dne 26. julija 1971 o odpravi omejitev svobode opravljanja storitev pri javnih naročilih za gradnje in omejitev pri oddaji javnih naročil za gradnje izvajalcem, ki delajo prek zastopstev ali podružnic
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 71/304/EEC of 26 July 1971 concerning the abolition of restrictions on freedom to provide services in respect of public works contracts and on the award of public works contracts to contractors acting through agencies or branches
o predlogu odločbe Sveta o pooblastitvi držav članic, da v interesu Evropske skupnosti ratificirajo konsolidirano Konvencijo o delu v pomorstvu Mednarodne organizacije dela iz leta 2006
on the proposal for a Council decision on authorising Member States to ratify, in the interests of the European Community, the 2006 Consolidated Maritime Labour Convention of the International Labour Organisation