natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EU se mora seveda uskladiti z mednarodnimi finančnimi institucijami, vendar se ne more postaviti v položaj, v katerem je mandat za posojilo EU izrecno predmet delitve dela z EBRD.
The EU should of course coordinate with international financial institutions but cannot put itself in a position where the EU lending mandate is explicitly subject to work-sharing with the EBRD.
Ne more biti izključeno, da bi se instituciji EU, kot je EIB, lahko podelil mandat za ukrepanje tudi v primeru, v katerem se drugi finančni organ, kot je EBRD, ne bi hotel strinjati s posebno shemo "delitve dela".
It cannot be excluded that an EU Institution, such as the EIB, could be given a mandate to act even if another financial body, like the EBRD, did not want to agree a particular scheme for "work-sharing".
(7) Rusija in WNIS se upoštevajo pri pregledu splošnega mandata za posojilo EIB za leto 2006 v skladu s sklepom Sveta 2000/24/ES z dne 22. decembra 1999 o jamstvu Skupnosti, ki se odobri Evropski investicijski banki zaradi izgub pri posojilih za projekte zunaj Skupnosti (Srednja in Vzhodna Evropa, sredozemske države, Južna Amerika in Azija ter Južnoafriška republika).
(7) Russia and the WNIS should be fully taken into account for the 2006 review of the EIB general mandate under Council Decision 2000/24/EC of 22 December 1999 granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans for projects outside the Community (Central and Eastern Europe, Mediterranean countries, Latin America and Asia and the Republic of South Africa).
(7) Rusija in WNIS se upoštevajo pri pregledu splošnega mandata za posojilo EIB za leto 2006 v skladu s sklepom Sveta 2000/24/ES z dne 22. decembra 1999 o jamstvu Skupnosti, ki se odobri Evropski investicijski banki zaradi izgub pri posojilih za projekte zunaj Skupnosti (Srednja in Vzhodna Evropa, sredozemske države, Južna Amerika in Azija ter Južnoafriška republika).
(7) Russia, Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus should be fully taken into account for the 2006 review of the EIB general mandate under Council Decision 2000/24/EC of 22 December 1999 granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans for projects outside the Community (Central and Eastern Europe, Mediterranean countries, Latin America and Asia and the Republic of South Africa).
Pri tem pregledu je treba upoštevati tudi vključitev držav Južnega Kavkaza in Srednje Azije
Consideration should also be given to including countries of the South Caucasus and Central Asia at the time of this review.
Kot je na predlog odborov ITRE in AFET predhodno sprejel Parlament.
As previously adopted by Parliament on a proposal from the ITRE and AFET committees.
Armenija, Azerbajdžan, Georgia, Kazahstan, Kirgistan, Tadžikistan, Turkmenistan in Uzbekistan ne morejo biti predhodno izključeni iz naslednje generacije mandatov za posojila EIB.
Armenia, Azerbadjan, Georgia, Kazakstahn, Kyrgistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan should not be excluded beforehand in the consideration of the next generation of EIB lending mandates
Upravičeni projekti morajo biti gospodarsko izvedljivi in zelo zanimivi za Evropsko unijo.
Eligible projects shall be economically viable and of significant interest to the European Union.
Upravičena področja so okolje, prometna, telekomunikacijska in energetska infrastruktura na prednostnih povezavah vseevropskih omrežij (TEN), ki imajo čezmejne posledice za države članice.
Eligible sectors shall be environment as well as transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructure on priority Trans-European Network (TEN) axes having cross-border implications for a Member State.
Upravičena področja so okolje, prometna, telekomunikacijska in energetska infrastruktura, vključno z jedrsko varnostjo , na prednostnih povezavah vseevropskih omrežij (TEN), ki imajo čezmejne posledice za države članice.
Eligible sectors shall be environment , as well as transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructure , including nuclear safety, on priority Trans-European Network (TEN) axes having cross-border implications for a Member State.
Splošna zgornja meja odprtih posojil je 500 milijonov EUR.
The overall ceiling of the credits opened shall be EUR 500 million.
Projekti, financirani s posojili, ki jih krije jamstvo, ustrezajo naslednjim merilom:
Projects financed by loans to be covered by the guarantee shall satisfy the following criteria:
(a) izpolnjevanje pogojev v skladu s členom 2;
(a) eligibility in accordance with Article 2;
(b) sodelovanje in, kjer je primerno, priznavanje vloge EIB kot institucije EU, ki izvaja politike EU , sofinanciranje s strani EIB skupaj z drugimi mednarodnimi finančnimi institucijami, da bi zagotovili smotrno delitev tveganj in določili primerne pogoje, katerim morajo projekti ustrezati.
(b) co-operation with other international financial institutions , and where possible and appropriate , bearing in mind the task of the EIB to support EU policies, co-financing, with these institutions in order to ensure reasonable risk-sharing and appropriate project conditionality.
EIB in EBRD si ustrezno razdelita delo, kadar koli je to mogoče .
The EIB and the EBRD shall share the work appropriately.
EU bi seveda morala zagotoviti usklajevanje z mednarodnimi finančnimi institucijami, vendar se ne sme postaviti v položaj, v katerem bi bil mandat za posojilo EU izrecno predmet delitve dela z EBRD.
The EU should of course coordinate with international financial institutions but cannot put itself into a position where the EU lending mandate is explicitly subject to work-sharing with the EBRD.
Ne more biti izključeno, da bi se instituciji EU, kot je EIB, podelil mandat za delovanje tudi v primeru, v katerem se drugi finančni organ, kot je EBRD, ne bi hotel strinjati s posebno shemo "delitve dela".
It cannot be excluded that an EU Institution, such as the EIB, could be given a mandate to act even if another financial body, like the EBRD, did not want to agree a particular scheme for "work-sharing".
Posamezne države postanejo upravičene v okviru zgornje meje, kadar in če izpolnijo posebne pogoje, ki so v skladu s sporazumi Evropske unije na visoki ravni z obravnavano državo o političnih in makroekonomskih vidikih.
Individual countries shall become eligible under the ceiling as and when they fulfil specific conditionality consistent with European Union high level agreements with the country in question on political and macro-economic aspects.
Komisija določi, kdaj je posamezna država izpolnila posebne pogoje in o tem obvesti EIB.
The Commission shall determine when an individual country has fulfilled the specific conditionality and shall notify the EIB thereof.
Posamezne države postanejo upravičene v okviru zgornje meje, kadar in če izpolnijo posebne pogoje, ki so v skladu s politikami in sporazumi Evropske unije na visoki ravni z obravnavano državo o političnih in makroekonomskih vidikih.
Individual countries shall become eligible under the ceiling as and when they fulfil specific conditionality consistent with European Union policies and high level agreements with the country in question on political and macro-economic aspects.
Komisija določi, kdaj je posamezna država izpolnila posebne pogoje in o tem obvesti EIB.
The Commission shall determine when an individual country has fulfilled the specific conditionality and shall notify the EIB thereof after having informed the European Parliament and the Council and stated its reasons.
Samo omemba sporazumov "na visoki ravni" zveni čudno, saj ni jasno, kaj izraz "na visoki ravni" pomeni.
To only mention "high-level" agreements seems strange as it is not clear what "high-level" means.
Tudi pogoji so del oblikovanja politik v okviru običajnih postopkov in/ali predpisov.
Conditionalities are also part of political policy-making under the normal procedures and/or regulations.
Člen 4 a (novo)
Article 4 a (new)
Člen 4a
Article 4a
EIB je pozvana, da pripravi študije izvedljivosti o možni vključitvi držav Južnega Kavkaza in dežel osrednje Azije v splošni mandat od leta 2007 naprej.
The EIB is invited to prepare feasibility studies on the possible inclusion in the general mandate, as from 2007, of countries of the South Caucasus and Central Asia regions.
Kot je na predlog odborov ITRE in AFET predhodno sprejel Parlament.
As previously adopted by the Parliament following proposals from the ITRE and AFET committees.
Komisija je posredovala predlog za sklep Sveta o odobritvi jamstva Skupnosti za posojilne dejavnosti Evropske investicijske banke (EIB) v Rusiji in "zahodnih novih neodvisnih državah" (WNIS), namreč v Belorusiji, Moldaviji in Ukrajini.
The Commission has put forward a proposal for a Council decision on granting a Community guarantee for European Investment Bank (EIB) lending activities in Russia and the "Western New Independent States" (WNIS), namely Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine.
Dejavnosti EIB v teh državah so vezane na politični proces in pogoje.
The activities of the EIB in these countries are linked with the political process and with conditionalities.
Nobeno posojilo ne bo odobreno, če ni v skladu s "sosedsko politiko" in ustreznimi pogoji, da bi zagotovili, da so posojilne dejavnosti EIB v skladu s splošnimi politikami EU v dani državi ter da jih krepijo.
No loans will be signed unless they are in line with the "Neighbourhood Policy" and with appropriate conditionalities, to ensure that EIB loan operations are consistent with, and reinforce, the EU's general policies in the given country.
Opozoriti je treba, da so spomladi že bila izvedena posvetovanja s Parlamentom glede spremembe splošnega mandata.V svojem poročilu je Parlament predlagal vključitev Rusije in WNIS v splošni mandat.
It should be noted that, in the spring, the Parliament was already consulted on a modification of the general mandate and, in its report, suggested that Russia and the WNIS should be included under the general mandate.
Kljub široki podpori končnemu predlogu irskega predsedstva, je bil le-ta slednjič zaustavljen s strani dveh ali treh držav v Svetu.
Despite a broadly supported final proposal by the Irish Presidency this was in the end blocked by only two or three countries in the Council.
To je bilo seveda obžalovanja vredno, zlasti ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je bila širitev posojilnih dejavnosti na vzhod, ki dejansko obstaja že v vseh regijah v svetu, očitno uporabljena kot pogajalsko sredstvo v notranjih pogajanjih Sveta.
This was of course lamentable, especially considering that the extension of lending activities to the East, already existing for practically all regions in the world, was apparently used as a bargaining chip in internal Council negotiations.
To je razlog, zakaj se sedaj Komisija "ponovno posvetuje" s Parlamentom glede Rusije in WNIS v novem predlogu.
This is the reason why the Commission has now re-consulted the Parliament concerning Russia and the WNIS in a new proposal.
Poročevalec izraža obžalovanje glede vedenja Sveta in še enkrat poudarja, da bi bilo veliko lažje vključiti te dejavnosti v splošni mandat za posojila vsaj na prehodni podlagi do načrtovane revizije v letu 2006.
The rapporteur regrets the attitude of the Council and has to stress, again, that it would have been far easier to simply include these actions under the general lending mandate, at least on a provisional basis until its planned revision in 2006.
Poročevalec želi poudariti, da je glavno politično opravičilo za te vidike seveda povezano z dejstvom, da so potrebne dejanske odločitve na terenu, verjetno predvsem na področju varstva okolja in jedrskega varstva, kjer obstaja veliko nezadovoljeno povpraševanje po posojilih, in kjer bi lahko jamstva za posojila bila učinkovita.
The rapporteur wishes to underline that the main political justification for these aspects are of course linked to the fact that real decisions on the ground are needed, perhaps especially in the field of environment and nuclear security, where there is a large unmet credit demand and where the loan guarantees could make a difference.
Kljub institucionalnim vidikom in vztrajnemu upiranju Sveta, da bi na tem področju upošteval mnenja Parlamenta, poročevalec meni, da je treba sprejeti pristop, ki bo zagotovil jamstvo in ne bo povzročil tveganja za vnovični zastoj.
Notwithstanding the institutional aspects and the stubborn reluctance of Council to pay much attention to the Parliament's opinions in this area, he therefore considers that an approach which will ensure this guarantee facility and not risk another stalemate should be adopted.
Jamstvo bi se uporabljalo za posojila, podpisana do 31. januarja 2007.
The guarantee would apply for loans signed until 31 January 2007.
Sklep 2000/24/ES, kot je bil spremenjen v Sklepih 1999/786/ES, 2000/688/ES, 2000/788/ES in 2001/777/ES. .
Decision 2000/24/EC and as amended in Decisions: 1999/786/EC, 2000/688/EC, 2000/788/EC and 2001/777/EC. .
Predlog Komisije bi pomenil 100% kritje skupnih zneskov teh posojil z mehanizmom jamstvenega sklada, v katerega prihajajo plačila iz proračuna EU.
The Commission proposal would mean a 100% coverage of the aggregate amounts of these loans through the Guarantee Fund mechanism, the payments to which are coming from the EU budget.
Poročevalec bi rad opozoril, da je zunanja posojilna zmožnost EU pomemben inštrument zunanje politike/razvoja, ki predstavlja močan instrument celotne zmožnosti EU, ki prispeva k razvoju in varnosti v naši neposredni soseski, če je primerno uporabljen v skladu z dogovorjenimi političnimi pogoji.
The rapporteur would like to point out that the external lending capacity of the EU is an important foreign policy tool/development tool and that it is, properly used with agreed political conditionalities, a powerful tool in the overall capacity of the EU to contribute to development and security in our immediate neighbourhood.
Poročevalec ponovno izraža stališče Parlamenta, da je potrebno obravnavati vključevanje teh držav v splošni mandat za posojila od leta 2007 naprej.
The rapporteur reiterates the Parliament's position that consideration should be given to including these countries in the general lending mandate from 2007 and onwards.
Komisija, EIB in Svet so pozvani, naj to upoštevajo pri reviziji splošnega mandata za posojila, katere začetek je načrtovan za leto 2006.
The Commission, the EIB and the Council are invited to take this into account in the revision of the general lending mandate scheduled to start in 2006.
Poročevalec opaža v predlogu Komisije preveč stroge formulacije v zvezi z usklajevanjem z Evropsko banko za obnovo in razvoj.
Finally, the rapporteur notes in the Commission proposal excessively rigid formulations with regard to coordination with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Poročevalec v celoti podpira delitev dela s tem organom, kadar koli je to primerno, vendar meni, da predpisi EU in projekti na podlagi teh predpisov ne morejo biti formalno odvisni od mnenja EBRD.
The rapporteur fully supports work-sharing with this body, whenever appropriate, but considers that an EU regulation and the projects that flow from it cannot be formally subject to the opinions of the EBRD.
Zadeva: Pravna podlaga predloga sklepa Sveta o jamstvu Skupnosti, ki se odobri Evropski investicijski banki zaradi izgub pri posojilih za določene vrste projektov v Rusiji in v zahodnih novih neodvisnih državah (zahodne NND) ( KOM(2004)0385 – 2004/0121 (CNS))
Subject: Legal basis of the proposal for a Council decision granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans for certain types of projects in Russia and the Western New Independent States (WNIS) (COM (2004) 0385 – 2004/0121(CNS) )
Spoštovani gospod predsednik,
Dear Mr Lewandowski,
v pismu z dne 12. novembra 2004 ste v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosili za mnenje o primernosti pravne podlage zgoraj omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 12 November 2004, you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2) to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid.
Zgoraj omenjeno vprašanje je odbor obravnaval na seji dne 25. novembra 2004.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 25 November 2004.
Pobuda temelji na členu 308 Pogodbe ES.
The initiative is based on Article 308 of the EC Treaty.
V ustaljeni sodni praksi velja, da v okviru sistema pristojnosti Skupnosti izbira pravne podlage določenega akta temeljiti na objektivnih elementih, ki so lahko predmet sodnega nadzora.
According to settled case law, in the context of the organisation of the powers of the Community the choice of the legal basis for a measure must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review.
Med te elemente sodita zlasti cilj in vsebina akta
Those factors include in particular the aim and the content of the measure
Cilj pobude je torej odobritev jamstva Skupnosti v višini največ 500 milijonov evrov za kritje odobrenih posojil v Rusiji in v zahodnih novih neodvisnih državah (zahodne NND) s strani Evropske investicijske banke(EIB) v okviru podaljšanja izvajanja sklepa o "severni dimenziji" in v skladu z novo sosedsko politiko v razširjeni Evropi.
The aim of the proposal is the granting of a Community guarantee for an amount of up to EUR 500 million to cover lending in Russia and the Western New Independent States (WNIS) by the European Investment Bank (EIB) as a further development of the Decision on the Northern Dimension and in line with the Wider Europe - New Neighbourhood policy.
Vmesna ocena mandata za posojila zunaj Evropske unije, ki je bil dodeljen Evropski investicijski banki (EIB) v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/24/ES, je opozorila na potrebo po povečanju vlaganj v Rusiji in zahodnih novih neodvisnih državah (zahodne NND).
The mid-term review of the EIB external lending mandate pursuant to Council Decision 2000/24/EC acknowledged the need for increased investment in Russia and the WNIS.
Po členu 308 Pogodbe ES ima Skupnost možnost, da svoja pooblastila prilagodi glede na pristojnosti in uresničitve ciljev Pogodbe.
Article 308 of the EC Treaty allows the Community to adjust its powers in the light of the terms of reference and of the attainment of the objectives of the Treaty.
Če se želi navedeni člen uporabiti za pravno podlago določenega akta, je glede na ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča treba izpolnjevati naslednje pogoje:
In order to use this article as the legal basis for a piece of legislation the settled case law of the Court of Justice requires the following conditions to be met:
· predvideni ukrep mora težiti k uresničevanju enega izmed ciljev Skupnosti;
· the measure envisaged must seek to attain one of the objectives of the Community;
· ukrep mora biti nujen za uresničevanje tega cilja;
· the measure must be necessary for the attainment of this objective;
· Pogodba ne sme predvideti drugih za to potrebnih pooblastil.
· the Treaty must not provide elsewhere for the powers necessary to this end.
Vendar se zdi primernejša uporaba člena 181 A Pogodbe ES (dodan s Pogodbo iz Nice), saj akt spada v gospodarsko, finančno in tehnično sodelovanje s tretjimi državami.
However, Article 181a of the EC Treaty (added by the Nice Treaty) would seem to be applicable in view of the fact that the proposal in question is by way of being a measure for economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries.
Poleg tega je treba izpostaviti, da je pri sprejemanju sklepa v Svetu glede obeh aktov potrebno doseči različno večino glasov.
It should also be pointed out that the two provisions stipulate a different majority for decision-making in the Council.
Zaradi ohranitve institucionalnega ravnovesja, določenega s pogodbo, torej ne moremo uporabiti člena 308, ki zahteva soglasje Sveta z enostavnim posvetovanjem s Parlamentom, namesto določbe, ki zahteva zgolj kvalificirano večino v Svetu in posvetovanje s Parlamentom.
It follows that, in order to maintain the institutional balance laid down by the Treaty, Article 308 requiring unanimity in the Council with simple consultation of Parliament cannot be used instead of a provision requiring only a qualified majority in the Council and consultation of Parliament.
Mogoče je koristno, če spomnim, da se bodo v bodoče vprašanja urejala s postopkom soodločanja, v skladu s členom III-319 Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo.
It may also be helpful to point out in passing that, in future, the matter will be settled by codecision pursuant to Article III-319 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe.
Navzoči pri glasovanju Andrzej Jan Szejna (vršilec dolžnosti predsednika), Rainer Wieland (podpredsednik), Katalin Lévai (podpredsednik), Manuel Medina Ortega (pripravljavec mnenja), Maria Berger, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Aloyzas Sakalas, Ingo Schmitt (namestnik Therese Villiers), Esko Seppänen, Daniel Stroz, Diana Wallis et Jaroslav Zvěřina. sklenil, da je primerna pravna podlaga člen 181 A Pogodbe ES.
The following were present for the final vote: Andrzej Jan Szejna (acting chairman), Rainer Wieland (vice-chairman), Katalin Lévai (vice-chairwoman), Manuel Medina Ortega (draftsman), Maria Berger, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Aloyzas Sakalas, Ingo Schmitt (for Theresa Villiers), Esko Seppänen, Daniel Stroz, Diana Wallis and Jaroslav Zvěřina. that the appropriate legal basis is Article 181a of the EC Treaty.
MNENJEODBORA ZA ZUNANJE ZADEVE
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs
Pripravljavec mnenja: Dariusz Kajetan Rosati
Draftsman: Dariusz Kajetan Rosati
Mandat Evropske investicijske banke (EIB) za dajanje posojil tretjim državam je zelo pomemben: za obdobje vključno z letom 2006 znaša več kot 20 milijard EUR.
The European Investment Bank's (EIB) mandate for lending outside the European Union is very significant: just over € 20 000 million for the period up to and including the year 2006.
Ta mandat zajema večino delov sveta, pri čemer predstavljajo nove neodvisne države (NIS) ali 'postsovjetski prostor' najpomembnejšo izjemo.
This mandate covers most parts of the world, with the Newly Independent States (NIS) or the 'post-Soviet space' as the most notable exception.
Vendar obstaja za dajanje posojil Rusiji malo priložnosti.
There is, however, a small window for lending to Russia.
V okviru posebnega mandata se lahko odobri posojilo v višini 100 milijonov EUR za jedrsko varnost in okoljske projekte v najzahodnejših delih države.
Under a special mandate, € 100 million can be lent for environmental projects in the westernmost parts of the country.
Ta mandat je sedaj že v celoti izčrpan.
This mandate is now fully exploited.
S širitvijo EU 1. maja 2004 so se v okviru mandata za dajanje posojil tretjim državam sprostila znatna sredstva.
The EU enlargement on 1 May 2004 freed up a huge sum in the external lending mandate.
Že pred enim letom je Komisija predlagala prenos skoraj celotnega zneska na tretje države v Sredozemski regiji in na Balkan.
Already a year ago, the Commission proposed a transfer of almost the entire sum to the non-Member countries in the Mediterranean region and to the Balkans.
Poseben mandat za posojilo bi postal del splošnega mandata, povečan bi bil na 300 milijonov EUR, kar se tiče vrste projektov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, bi bil manj omejen in zajemal bi tudi 'vzhodne nove neodvisne države' (Ukrajino, teoretično tudi Moldavijo in le uradno Belorusijo).
The special lending mandate would, however, become part of the general mandate, be increased to € 300 million, be less restricted in terms of the type of projects which could be supported and also cover 'the Western NIS' (Ukraine, theoretically also Moldova and with Belarus only formally included).
Svet je ta predlog podprl, vendar daje prednost ohranitvi splošnega mandata in povečanju zgornje meje na 500 milijonov EUR.
The Council gave its support, but preferred to keep the special mandate and to increase its ceiling to € 500 million.
Parlament se je strinjal s predlogom Komisije o vključitvi v splošni mandat za posojila in bil naklonjen povečanju na 800 milijonov 1 .
Parliament agreed with the Commission proposal on integration into the general lending mandate and favoured an increase to € 800 million.