natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0019/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6-0019/2005 ),
Nezakoniti ribolov je eden najbolj žgočih problemov, s katerim se ukvarja Komisija za ohranjanje antarktičnih živih morskih virov (CCAMLR).
One of the main problems discussed within the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) is illegal fishing.
Med pobudami za reševanje problema je CCAMLR leta 1999 sprejel sistem dokumentacije o ulovu vrste Dissoctichus mawsoni, ki se je na ravni Skupnosti pričel uporabljati leta 2001.
One of the initiatives taken to combat the scourge of illegal fishing is the catch documentation scheme for toothfish, which was adopted by the CCAMLR in 1999 and introduced at Community level in 2001.
Temeljni namen sistema je zagotoviti boljše spremljanje mednarodnih podatkov o tej vrsti, in sicer na osnovi podatkov o tem, od kod prihaja uvoz oziroma izvoz, pa tudi na osnovi zbiranja podatkov o ulovu, potrebnih za znanstveno oceno staleža.
The scheme is designed to improve the monitoring of international trade in this species by determining the origin of imports and exports and collecting catch data in order to facilitate the scientific evaluation of stocks.
Leta 2003 je CCAMLR ugotovil, da je sistem dokumentacije ulova v določenih točkah pomanjkljiv in da omogoča nedovoljeno ravnanje.
In 2003 the CCAMLR noted that the catch documentation scheme was not sufficiently precise and that this had given rise to the fraudulent use of the scheme.
Predlog Uredbe (ES) št.1035/2001 je plod najnovejših ugotovitev zdajšnje Komisije.
The proposed amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1035/2001 are based on the CCAMLR's most recent discussions.
Pristojni organi so ugotovili, da vrsto Dissostichus mawsoni, za katero je potrebno izpolniti posebni dokument o ulovu, občasno raztovorijo v pristaniščih držav, ki ne uporabljajo sistema dokumentacije o ulovu.
The authorities responsible have found that toothfish covered by catch documents was sometimes being landed in ports of countries not applying the catch documentation scheme.
Obstajajo celo primeri, ko je bilo iztovarjanje opravljeno v pristaniščih držav, ki sistem uporabljajo, a so potrebne dokumente potrjevali organi držav, pod zastavo katerih je plulo ribiško plovilo, namesto da bi to storili pristojni organi pristanišča.
In addition, landings in the ports of countries applying the scheme were in certain cases validated by the authorities of the flag state rather than by the competent authorities of the port.
Pokazala se je torej potreba po dopolnitvi prvotne uredbe: prvič, z natančno opredelitvijo organov, pristojnih za nadzor nad iztovarjanjem te vrste rib, in drugič, z razširitvijo izvajanja uredbe na še nova območja.
Hence the need to amend the initial regulation, firstly by specifying the authorities authorised to control landings of toothfish and secondly by expanding the scope of the regulation.
Predlog tako vključuje definicijo besede "uvoz", s čemer naj bi bilo onemogočeno vsakršno nedovoljeno ravnanje.
The proposal thus includes a definition of the term ‘import’ in order to preclude all fraudulent practices.
Ne gre pozabiti, da je prvi pogoj za boj proti nezakonitemu ribolovu prav učinkoviti nadzor nad trgovinskimi kanali.
It should be borne in mind that the main weapon in the fight against illegal fishing is the effective monitoring of marketing circuits.
Po novem brez dokumenta o ulovu vrste Dissostichus mawsoni ne bo mogoče niti uvažati niti izvažati .
In future, it will be impossible to import or export toothfish without a catch document.
Predlog Komisije dopolnjuje 4 člene:
The Commission proposal amends four articles:
- Sprememba v členu 3 prinaša definicijo besede "uvoz".
- The amendment to Article 3 introduces a definition of the term ‘import’.
Namen je razširiti območje uporabe uredbe in to tako, da je beseda rabljena v istem pomenu, kot ga ima beseda uvoz v carinskem smislu, to pa pomeni številne in stroge nadzore.
The aim is to extend the scope of the regulation by linking it to the customs-based concept of import, which entails a series of strict controls.
V celoti gledano je cilj razširitve uporabe uredbe boljši nadzor nad tem, kako proizvod potuje po trgu Skupnosti, vključno z začasno uvoženimi in izvoženimi ribami (predvsem za razstave), oziroma nad ribami, ki so v tranzitu (za predelavo).
Overall, this expansion in scope is designed to improve monitoring of the product when it passes into or out of the Community market, including stocks imported or exported temporarily (particularly for trade fairs) or in transit (processed products).
- Cilj sprememb v členu 4 je določiti pogoje pridobitve licenc ali dovoljenj za lov in uvesti obvezno raztovarjanje ulova v državah, ki uporabljajo sistem dokumentacije o ulovu.
- The amendments to Article 4 are designed to link the granting of fishing licences or permits to the obligation to land catches in countries applying the catch documentation scheme.
Z novimi določili naj bi onemogočili iztovarjanje v pristaniščih, v katerih sistema dokumentacije o ulovu ne uporabljajo.
These provisions are intended to exclude landings in ports which do not apply the scheme.
- Namen sprememb v členih 10 in 12 je natančno opredeliti, kateri organi v državi, kjer se nahaja pristanišče, so pristojni za nadzor nad sistemom dokumentacije o ulovu.
- The amendments to Articles 10 and 12 are designed to specify the port state authorities which are authorised to monitor catch documentation schemes.
To naj bi preprečilo nezakonito ravnanje.
This will prevent fraudulent practices.
Poročevalka ocenjuje, da spremembe Uredbe št. 1035/2001 dosledno upoštevajo najnovejša priporočila CCAMLR in so ustrezna osnova za boljše spremljanje ulova te vrste rib ter za omejevanje nepravilnega ravnanja.
Your rapporteur believes that the amendments to Regulation No 1035/2001 faithfully reflect the CCAMLR’s latest recommendations and will make it possible to monitor toothfish exploitation as effectively as possible whilst limiting fraud.
Priporočene spremembe se v državah članicah, ki jih vprašanje zadeva, praktično že uporabljajo, vseeno pa poročevalka glede predloga daje pozitivno mnenje.
Consequently, even though the changes recommended are in fact already being implemented in the Member States concerned, your rapporteur takes a favourable view of the proposal.
Predlog Uredbe Sveta za spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1035/2001 o oblikovanju sistema dokumentacije o ulovu za ribe vrste Dissostichus spp.
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1035/2001 establishing a catch documentation scheme for Dissostichus spp.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o izmenjavi podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence
on the proposal for a Council decision on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................10
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT .............................................................................................10
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2004)0664 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0664 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 31 in 34(2)(c) Pogodbe EU,
– having regard to Articles 31 and 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0163/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0163/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0020/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0020/2005 ),
Vsak osrednji organ nemudoma obvesti osrednje organe drugih držav članic o obsodbah državljanov navedenih držav članic, evidentiranih v nacionalni kazenski evidenci in o pomembnih naknadnih vpisih v kazensko evidenco, ki se nanjo nanašajo.
Each central authority shall without delay inform the central authorities of the other Member States of convictions of nationals of those Member States registered in the national criminal record and of relevant subsequent entries in the criminal record .
Vsak osrednji organ nemudoma, v vsakem primeru pa najkasneje v treh mesecih obvesti osrednje organe drugih držav članic o obsodbah državljanov navedenih držav članic, evidentiranih v nacionalni kazenski evidenci .
Each central authority shall immediately and in any event within three months at most inform the central authorities of the other Member States of convictions of nationals of those Member States registered in the national criminal record.
Učinkovitost zadevnega predloga je odvisna od pogostosti, s katero osrednji organi držav članic ažurirajo podatke, ki jih vsebujejo kazenskih evidence.
The effectiveness of the proposal under consideration depends upon the frequency with which the Member States' central authorities periodically update the data contained in their criminal records.
Zadnji del člena je črtan, da bi bilo besedilo bolj razumljivo (izpustitev odvečnih podrobnosti, ki bi med uporabniki sistema lahko povzročile zmedo).
The final section of the article is deleted in order to make the text easier to understand (through omission of unnecessary detail which could cause confusion amongst users of the system).
Osrednji organ zaprošene države članice pošlje odgovor osrednjemu organu države prosilke takoj in v vsakem primeru v roku, ki ne presega pet delovnih dni od prejema zahtevka pod pogoji, ki jih določa nacionalna zakonodaja, na temelju obrazca za odgovor B, ki je priložen temu sklepu.
The reply shall be sent immediately and in any event within a period not exceeding five working days from the receipt of the request, under the conditions provided for by national law, by the central authority of the requested Member State to the central authority of the requesting Member State on the basis of reply form B annexed hereto.
Vključuje podatke, posredovane v skladu s členom 3.
It shall include the information transmitted in accordance with Article 3.
Osrednji organ zaprošene države članice pošlje odgovor osrednjemu organu države prosilke v nujnih primerih v 48 urah, drugače pa v roku , ki ne presega deset delovnih dni od prejema zahtevka pod pogoji, ki jih določa nacionalna zakonodaja, na temelju obrazca za odgovor B, ki je priložen temu sklepu.
The reply shall be sent immediately and in any event within 48 hours in urgent cases and otherwise within a period not exceeding ten working days from the receipt of the request, under the conditions provided for by national law, by the central authority of the requested Member State to the central authority of the requesting Member State on the basis of reply form B annexed hereto.
V nujnih primerih je 48 ur najkrajši čas, ki ga večina držav članic potrebuje za potrditev ali je bil posameznik pridržan ali ne.
In urgent cases, 48 hours is the minimum amount of time required in many Member States for confirmation to be provided as to whether or not an individual is being held in custody.
V drugih primerih lahko zaprošena država članica pošlje odgovor v roku desetih delovnih dni od prejema zahtevka.
In other cases the requested Member State may send its reply within ten working days of receiving the request.
K obrazcu za odgovor se priloži izjava o obsodbah.
The reply form shall be accompanied by a statement of convictions.
K obrazcu za odgovor se priloži izjava o obsodbah, zapisanih v kazenski evidenci .
The reply form shall be accompanied by a statement of the convictions entered in the criminal record .
Namen predloga spremembe je narediti besedilo takoj razumljivo uporabnikom sistema.
The purpose of the amendment is to make the text immediately comprehensible to users of the system.
Člen 5, odstavek 1, točka (b)
Article 5, paragraph 1, letter (b)
b) za druge namene v mejah, ki jih določi zaprošena država, in v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo države prosilke.
(b) for other purposes within the limits specified by the request ed Member State and in accordance with national law of the requesting Member State.
b) za druge namene v mejah, ki jih na obrazcu določi država prosilka ter jih potrdi zaprošena država članica , in v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo države prosilke.
(b) for other purposes within the limits specified on the form by the request ing Member State and approved by the requested Member State and in accordance with national law of the requesting Member State.
Če se osebni podatki posredujejo za namene, ki niso povezani s kazenskimi postopki, se morajo države prosilke in zaprošene države članice zavedati omejitevi, v okviru katerih se lahko zberejo taki podatki, in jih tudi medsebojno sprejeti.
Where personal data are forwarded for purposes other than criminal proceedings, the requesting and requested Member States must be aware of, and must have mutually accepted, the limits within which such information may be gathered.
Kadar so osebni podatki posredovani v skladu z odstavkom 1b) tega člena, zaprošena država članica lahko zaprosi državo članico prosilko, da jo obvesti o uporabi teh podatkov.
Where personal data is transmitted under paragraph 1(b) of this Article, the requested Member State may ask the requesting Member State to inform it of the use made of it.
Kadar so osebni podatki posredovani v skladu z odstavkom 1b) tega člena, država članica prosilka obvesti zaprošeno državo članico glede uporabe teh podatkov.
Where personal data is transmitted under paragraph 1(b) of this Article, the requested Member State shall be informed by the requesting Member State regarding the use made of it.
Če se osebni podatki posredujejo za namene, ki niso povezani s kazenskimi postopki, je zaprošeno državo članico treba obvestiti glede uporabe podatkov s strani države članice prosilke.
Where personal data are forwarded for purposes other than criminal proceedings, the requested Member State must be informed regarding the use which the requesting Member State has made of them.
Člen 5, odstavek 3a (novo)
Article 5, paragraph 3a (new)
Konvencija Sveta Evrope o varstvu posameznikov glede avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov z dne 28. januarja 1981 in člen 23 Konvencije Sveta Evrope o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije z dne 29. maja 2000 se uporabita za ta člen.
The 28 January 1981 Council of Europe Convention on the protection of individuals with regard to the automatic processing of personal data and Article 23 of the 29 May 2000 Council of Europe Convention on mutual assistance in criminal matters between the Member States of the European Union shall apply to this Article.
V besedilu je treba pojasniti, da je spoštovanje veljavnih Konvencij eden od pogojev, ki urejajo uporabo osebnih podatkov.
It should be made clear in the text that compliance with current conventions is one of the conditions governing the use of personal data.
Idealno bi bilo sklicevanje na nova pravila, za sprejetje katerih se je pred nekaj časa obvezala EU, da bi zaščitila podatke v primerih, ko so le-ti uporabljeni za namene vzdrževanja javne varnosti.
The ideal thing would be a reference to the new rules which the EU some time ago undertook to adopt with a view to protecting data in cases where the latter are used for the purpose of maintaining public security.
Če so takšna pravila sprejeta pred zadevnim besedilom, je treba sklic iz predlagane spremembe ažurirati.
If such rules are adopted before the text under consideration is, the reference contained in the proposed amendment should be updated.
Države članice začnejo izvajati ta sklep čim prej in v vsakem primeru najpozneje 30. junija 2005 .
Member States shall implement this Decision as soon as possible and in any event no later than 30 June 2005 .
Države članice začnejo ta sklep izvajati čim prej in v vsakem primeru v roku šestih mesecev od datuma objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije .
Member States shall implement this Decision as soon as possible and in any event within six months of the date upon which it is published in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Določanje rokov vnaprej ni smotrno; boljše bi bilo počakati na konec postopka in določiti časovni okvir.
No dates should be set in advance; it would be better to wait for a definite timeframe to emerge once the procedure is concluded.
Obrazec A, točka (a), tretja alinea
Form A, letter a), third line
Kontaktna oseba :
Contact person :
Kontaktna služba :
Contact office :
Pripraviti je treba vse potrebno za predvsem občutljive, kompleksne preiskave, v katerih mora identiteta sodnikov, ki jih vodijo, biti zaupna zaradi njihove varnosti.
Provision should be made for particularly delicate, complex investigations in which the identity of the magistrates conducting them needs to be kept confidential in the interests of their safety.
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o izmenjavi podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence
Proposal for a Council decision on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record
člen 39 (1), EU
Article 39(1) EU
člen 93 in člen 51
Rules 93 and 51
Datum predložitve - A6
Date tabled – A[5]
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku skupnosti
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ki spreminja Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku skupnosti
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (12060/2/2004 – C6‑0211/2004 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (12060/2/2004 – C6‑0211/2004 ),
Besedila, sprejeta 20.4.2004, P5_TA(2004)0281 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0452 )
Texts Adopted, 20.4.2004, P5_TA(2004)0281 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0452 )
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6‑0021/2005 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0021/2005 ),
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku skupnosti
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code
členi 251(2), 26, 95, 133, 135 ES
Articles 251(2) and 26, 95, 133, 135 EC
Datum 1. obravnave EP - P[5]
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P[5]
Predlog Komisije:
Commission proposal
Datum predložitve - A6
Date tabled – A[6]
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o ustanovitvi Agencije Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva in o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št.2847/93 o oblikovanju nadzornega sistema na področju skupne ribiške politike
on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Community Fisheries Control Agency and amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 establishing a control system applicable to the Common Fisheries Policy
Simboli za postopke
Symbols for procedures
* Posvetovalni postopek večina oddanih glasov
* Consultation procedure majority of the votes cast
**I Postopek sodelovanja (prvo branje) večina oddanih glasov
**I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast
**II Postopek sodelovanja (drugo branje) večina oddanih glasov, za odobritev skupnega stališča večina članov Parlamenta, za zavrnitev ali spremembo skupnega stališča
**II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position
*** Postopek soglasja večina članov Parlamenta, razen v primerih, ki so zajeti v členih 105, 107, 161 in 300 Pogodbe ES in v členu°7 Pogodbe EU
*** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
***I Postopek soodločanja (prvo branje) večina oddanih glasov
***I Codecision procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast
***II Postopek soodločanja (drugo branje) večina oddanih glasov, za odobritev skupnega stališča večina članov Parlamenta, za zavrnitev ali spremembo skupnega stališča
***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position
***III Postopek soodločanja (tretje branje) večina oddanih glasov, za odobritev skupnega besedila
***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text
(Vrsta postopka je odvisna od pravne osnove, ki jo predlaga Komisija.)
(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission)
V spremembah Parlamenta je spremenjeno besedilo označeno s krepkim ležečim tiskom .
In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics .
Označevanje z običajnim ležečim tiskom pomeni, da označujejo ustrezni oddelki dele zakonodajnega besedila, za katere je predlagan popravek, kar pomaga pri pripravi končnega besedila (na primer očitne napake ali izpuščeni deli v dani jezikovni različici).
Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
Ti predlagani popravki so v skladu z dogovorom med zadevnimi oddelki.
These suggested corrections are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned.
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUN.....................................................................................18
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS.................................................................20
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o ustanovitvi Agencije Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva in o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 2847/93 o oblikovanju nadzornega sistema na področju skupne ribiške politike
on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Community Fisheries Control Agency and amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 establishing a control system applicable to the Common Fisheries Policy
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2004)0289 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0289 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0021/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0021/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0022/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0022/2005 ),
(2) Države članice morajo za izpolnitev teh obveznosti uskladiti svoj nadzor in inšpekcijske preglede v vodah Skupnosti in v mednarodnih vodah v zvezi z dejavnostmi ribiških plovil Skupnosti, zlasti ob upoštevanju obveznosti Skupnosti v okviru regionalnih ribiških organizacij in v skladu s sporazumi s tretjimi državami.
(2) To fulfil these obligations it is necessary for the Member States to coordinate their control and inspection activities in Community waters and international waters with regard to the activities of Community fishing vessels taking into account, in particular, the obligations of the Community in with the framework of regional fisheries organisations and under agreements with third countries.