natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ena od možnosti je bilo tudi letalsko gorivo in z njim povezane emisije, kot mogoč prihodnji razvoj, s katerim bi se odpravile davčne oprostitve za letalsko gorivo.
Consideration was also given to aviation fuel and related emissions as a possible future development to end the current tax exemption for jet fuel.
· nacionalne stopnje DDV, ki bi financiranje EU naredila razumljivejšega za državljane
· the national VAT rate, making the financing of the EU more understandable to citizens
Dodatnih davčnih bremen ne bi bilo, ker bi bila EU stopnja nadomeščena z ustreznim znižanjem nacionalne stopnje DDV.
There would be no additional tax burden as the EU rate would be offset by an equivalent decrease of the national VAT rate.
EU in nacionalni DDV morata biti prikazana kot ločena davka v računih in potrdilih.
The EU and national VAT should appear as separate taxes on the invoices or receipts.
· davka na dobiček podjetij
· a corporate income tax
Ta možnost bi zahtevala največ časa za izvedbo tako s političnega kot upravnega vidika, kajti zaradi načela doseganja usklajenosti davčne osnove bi bilo potrebno skleniti politični sporazum, še preden se določi najnižja stopnja.
This alternative would take longest to implement, both from a political and from an administrative perspective, since a political agreement would be needed on the principle of achieving harmonization of the tax base, before setting a minimum rate. .
Sistem, ki v celoti temelji na davkih, na tej stopnji integracije EU ni bil obravnavan kot realističen in ga zato Komisija ni predlagala.
A fully tax-based system was not considered realistic at this stage of EU integration and therefore not proposed by the Commission.
Davčni vir bi bil vpeljan postopoma, kot nadomestilo trenutnih sredstev iz DDV, poleg bolj omejenih sredstev iz BNP.
The fiscal resource would be introduced progressively as a replacement to the current VAT resource, alongside a more limited GNI resource.
Glede britanskega popusta je Komisija predlagala prilagoditev obstoječega korekcijskega mehanizma tako, da bi se uporabljal za vse glavne plačnike ter hkrati zagotavljal tistim, ki do popravka niso upravičeni, da njihovi stroški ne bodo previsoki, in sicer tako, da se količina popravkov omeji na najvišji znesek
As for the question of the British rebate, the Commission proposed to adjust the existing correction mechanism so as to apply it to all main contributors, while giving assurances to those not benefiting from such a correction that the cost for them would not soar, by limiting the volume of corrections to a maximum amount.
Ta splošni mehanizem popravkov bi bil izvajan, če bi neto prispevki presegli 0,35 % BDP vsake države.
This general correction mechanism would be triggered if net contributions exceeded 0.35% of each country’s GNI.
Prispevki nad to mejo bi bili povrnjeni s 66 % stopnjo.
Contributions above this would be refunded at a rate of 66%.
Količina skupnih vračil naj bi bila omejena na največ 7,5 milijard EUR na leto, financirana s strani vseh držav članic, glede na njihov relativni delež BDP.
The total refund volume would be limited to a maximum of EUR 7.5 billion a year, financed by all Member States based on their relative share of GNI.
Uvedbo mehanizma bi morali v 4 letnem obdobju spremljati prehodni ukrepi za VB, da se olajša finančni vpliv spremembe. .
The introduction of the mechanism should be accompanied by transitional measures for the UK in order to alleviate the financial impact of the changeover, over a 4-year period.
Posvetovanja z nacionalnimi parlamenti
Consultations with national parliaments
Pri preučevanju predlogov Komisije iz leta 2004 je poročevalec prišel do zaključka, da bi bilo treba vsako zadevo Parlamenta o lastnih sredstvih in s ciljem pravičnejše, preglednejše in preprostejše rešitve obravnavati skupaj s parlamenti držav članic, ker so one tiste, ki se morajo strinjati s katerim koli predlogom.
When studying these proposals made by the Commission in 2004, your rapporteur came to the conclusion that any work of the European Parliament on the own resources topic with an aim to finding an equitable, simple and transparent solution would need to be done in close cooperation with the parliaments of the Member States because it was them, that in the end, would need to agree on any proposal made.
Zato je bila tema o lastnih sredstvih uvrščena na dnevni red lanskega srečanja Odbora za proračun EP z odbori za proračun nacionalnih parlamentov.
This was why the own resources topic was put on the agenda of last year's meeting of the EP Committee on Budgets with the national parliaments' budget committees.
Pozitiven odziv predstavnikov nacionalnih parlamentov glede uvrstitve točke o lastnih sredstvih na dnevni red ter zanimive in odprte razprave so ob tej priložnosti opogumile poročevalca, da nadaljuje v začrtani smeri.
The positive reaction of the representatives of the national parliaments to having the own resources item on the agenda and the interesting and open discussions led on this occasion encouraged the rapporteur to proceed in this direction.
Novembra 2005 je bil vsem odborom za proračun v nacionalnih parlamentih poslan vprašalnik, ki ga je sestavil poročevalec.
In November 2005, a questionnaire drafted by the rapporteur was sent to all budget committees of the national parliaments.
Cilj tega vprašalnika je bil odgovor na vprašanje, ali je mogoče vzpostaviti osnovna osrednja načela reforme sistema lastnih sredstev, ki bi jih podpiral Evropski parlament in predstavniki večine parlamentov držav članic ("starih" in "novih" ter "neto plačnic", južnih in severnih itd.)
The objective of this questionnaire was to explore whether some central basic principles for a reform of the own resources system could be established which could be supported by the European Parliament and a representative majority of the parliaments of the Member States ("old" and "new" ones, "net-payers" and "net-contributors", Southern and Northern ones, etc.).
Do sedaj je poročevalec izmenjal mnenja z odbori za proračun ali njihovimi predstavniki v naslednjih državah: Luksemburg, Portugalska, Finska, Francija, Nemčija in Španija.
So far, the rapporteur has been given the opportunity to speak to the budget committees, or their representatives, of Luxembourg, Portugal, Finland, France, Germany and Spain.
Pri analizi pisnih odgovorov na vprašalnik in rezultatov dvostranskih srečanj so se začele pojavljati nekatere splošne točke morebitnega sporazuma, kot je soglasje, da čas za resnično evropski davek še ni prišel ali prepričanje, da spremembe v financiranju Evropske unije ne smejo voditi k povečanju davčnih bremen evropskih državljanov.
In analysing the written replies to the questionnaire as well as the results of the bilateral meetings, some general points of possible agreement have slowly begun to emerge, like a consensus that the time for a genuine European tax has not yet come or the conviction that any change in the financing of the European Union must not lead to an increase in the tax burden of the European citizens.
Vendar je to le začetek intenzivne razprave z nacionalnimi parlamenti, ki se je pred kratkim razširila na večstransko raven, zato ker je bilo o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev Unije govora tudi v delovnih skupinah medparlamentarnega srečanja, ki sta ga v Bruslju 8. in 9. maja 2006 skupaj organizirala Evropski parlament in avstrijski parlament.
However, this is just the beginning of an intense discussion process with the national parliaments which has recently spread to a multilateral level, as the future of the Union's own resources was also discussed in one of the working groups of the Interparliamentary meeting, jointly organised by the European Parliament and the Austrian parliament on 8 - 9 May 2006 in Brussels.
Naslednje letno srečanje Odbora za proračun EP skupaj s predsedniki odborov za proračun nacionalnih parlamentov, ki je predvideno za 21. junij 2006, bo pomenilo možnost za naslednji krog pogajanj in morebitne sklepe.
The next annual meeting of the EP Committee on Budgets with the chairs of the budget committees of the national parliaments which is scheduled for 21 June 2006 will provide an opportunity for another round of talks and possible conclusions.
Če se bodo parlamentarni stiki še naprej odvijali v duhu vzajemnega zaupanja in odprtosti, v katerem so se začeli, je poročevalec prepričan, da bi med Evropskim parlamentom in parlamenti držav članic lahko prišlo do skupnega stališča o osnovnih načelih sistema lastnih sredstev v prihodnosti.
If parliamentary contacts continue in the spirit of mutual trust and openness they have started in, your rapporteur is convinced that some common understanding on basic principles how the own resources system of the future should look like could be achieved between the European Parliament and the parliaments of the Member States.
Samoiniciativno poročilo o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev EU
Own initiative report on the future of the EU's own resources
Poročevalec namerava rezultate dela, ki je potekalo skupaj z nacionalnimi parlamenti in Evropskim parlamentom predstaviti v samoiniciativnem poročilu o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev EU, ki bo obravnavano in o katerem se bo glasovalo na plenarnem zasedanju konec leta.
The rapporteur intends to present the results of the work conducted jointly by the national parliaments and the European Parliament in an own initiative report on the future of the EU's own resources, to be debated and voted in plenary by the end of this year.
To poročilo bi lahko zagotovilo nekatere splošne smernice za pregled dela Komisije in tako dalo jasen znak voditeljem držav in vlad o tem, kakšni bi lahko bili načrti njihovih parlamentov za prihodnost.
This report could then provide some common guidelines for the Commission's review work, thus giving a clear signal to the Heads of State and government of what their parliaments' concepts for the future may be.
BDP 2006
GDP 2006
"Nacionalni prispevek" k proračunu EU
"National contribution" to EU Budget
DDV + BDP, ki temeljita na plačilih lastnih sredstev (brez tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev) v milijonih EUR, proračun 2006 vključ.
VAT+GNI-based own resources payments (excluding Traditional own resources) in EUR million, Budget 2006 incl.
a državo
per country
(v milijonih EUR)
in EUR million
Na prebivalca
per capita
(v EUR)
in EUR
Na državo
per country
Evropski svet je na srečanju dne 15. in 16. decembra 2005 od Komisije zahteval, da predstavi predlog novega sklepa o lastnih sredstvih Evropske unije in spremenjeno različico delovnega dokumenta o britanskem rabatu, kar bo omogočilo izvrševanje sklepov Sveta o financiranju Unije in zagotovilo, da bo ureditev lastnih virov temeljila na načelih enakosti in postopnosti.
At its meeting of 15 and 16 December 2005, the European Council requested that the European Commission submit a proposal for a new decision on the own resources of the European Union as well as a modified version of the working document on the British rebate, in order to implement its conclusions concerning the financing of the Union and ensure that the arrangements concerning own resources must be guided by the principle of equity and progressiveness.
V skladu s sklepi Evropskega sveta iz Fontainebleauja leta 1984 je treba poskrbeti, da nobena država članica ne nosi proračunske obremenitve, ki presega njeno sorazmerno blaginjo.
These arrangements must then guarantee, in accordance with the conclusions of the European Council of Fontainebleau of 1984, that no Member state should support a budgetary charge which is excessive in relation to its relative prosperity.
Poglavitni del omenjenega predloga Komisije opredeljuje tehnične ukrepe za prilagoditev obstoječe zakonodaje o lastnih sredstvih, s katerimi naj bi uvedli posebne ugodnosti za Nemčijo, Avstrijo, Nizozemsko in Švedsko, ter metodo za izračun mehanizma popravka za Združeno kraljestvo, upoštevajoč dogovorjeno znižanje, s čimer naj bi zagotovili popolno udeležbo Združenega kraljestva pri financiranju stroškov sedanje širitve.
The major part of the abovementioned Commission proposal details the technical measures required to adapt the present own resources legislation in order to implement the special arrangements made in favour of Germany, Austria, the Netherlands and Sweden, as well as the method of calculating the United Kingdom correction mechanism taking into account the reductions agreed in order to ensure that the UK participates fully in the cost of the ongoing enlargement.
Lastna sredstva Unije naj bi bila „finančni vir, ki je ločen in neodvisen od držav članic“.
The Union's own resources are deemed to be "a source of finance separate and independent of the Member States".
Tako so bili viri lastnih sredstev Unije od nekdaj carine, kmetijske dajatve, dajatve za sladkor in DDV, leta 1988 pa so bili dodani še prihodki na osnovi BNP.
Thus the basis for the Union's own resources has traditionally been customs duties; agricultural levies, sugar levies and VAT supplemented since 1988 by a resource based on GNI.
Sedanji predlog ne spreminja obstoječih razmer.
This situation remains unchanged by the present proposal.
Vendar so zaradi globalizacije in posledičnega zmanjšanja carin postali prihodki na osnovi BNP ključni vir za financiranje pretežnega dela proračuna, ki vpliva na višino sredstev iz naslova DDV in – še pomembnejše – določa zgornjo mejo sredstev, do katerih je Skupnost upravičena.
However, globalisation and the consequent reduction in customs duties has meant that the GNI based resource is now the key resource financing the bulk of the budget, determining the cap on the VAT base and, most importantly, fixing the ceiling on total resources the Community can receive.
Zaradi vsega tega je mehanizem lastnih sredstev postal preživet in zastarel.
As a consequence of this evolution, the own resources mechanism has become largely jaded and out of date.
Če bo ostal, kakršen je, Unija v prihodnjih letih ne bo imela dovolj sredstev za soočanje z izzivi in doseganje ciljev.
Failure to change it will aggravate the insufficiency of the resources the Union needs to face the challenges of the coming years and achieve its ambitions.
Treba je predlagati nov sistem samofinanciranja, ki je celovit in pregleden ter lahko Uniji v prihodnjih letih zagotovi zadostno raven prihodkov.
A new self-financing scheme, which is comprehensible, transparent and capable of generating sufficient income for the Union over many years, should be proposed.
Prav v tem okviru lahko pride do predlogov o novih, dinamičnih virih prihodkov Unije.
It is clearly in this context that new dynamic sources of revenue for the Union may be proposed.
Treba je opredeliti še obliko finančnih orodij oziroma nabor najprimernejših finančnih mehanizmov za zadovoljevanje prihodnjih potreb.
The type of financial tool or the basket of financial mechanisms most apt to answer future needs remains to be determined.
Vsakršen predlog v tej smeri bi moral kot ključna elementa ohraniti plačila držav članic na osnovi odstotka BNP in njihovega relativnega bogastva.
Any such proposal should maintain payments made by Member States based on a percentage of GNI and their relative wealth as a central element.
Mogoče je predvideti tudi dopolnilna sredstva, sestavljena iz niza finančnih orodij, kot so npr. odstotek DDV-ja, delež od dobička podjetij ali delež od dohodnine.
Complementary sources made up of a combination of financial tools such as a percentage of VAT, a share in company profits, a percentage of income tax, could also be envisaged.
Odbor za regionalni razvoj poziva Odbor za proračun kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
V okviru tega bi morala Komisija začeti splošni pregled delovanja sistema virov lastnih sredstev, pri čemer bi po potrebi pripravila ustrezne predloge.
Within this framework, the Commission should therefore undertake a general review of the operation of the own resources system, accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals.
V okviru celovitega, splošnega pregleda, ki bo zajel vse vidike porabe, in pregleda virov sredstev EU, o katerem bo poročala v obdobju 2008/2009, Komisija začne splošni pregled sistema virov lastnih sredstev, pri čemer po potrebi pripravi ustrezne predloge.
In the framework of the full, wide-ranging review covering all aspects of EU spending and of resources on which it shall report in 2008/2009, the Commission shall undertake a general review of the own resources system, accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals.
Pri pripravi tovrstnega pregleda in oblikovanju predlogov mora Komisija upoštevati delo in priporočila Evropskega parlamenta v skladu s pogoji izjave, priložene medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju.
In undertaking this review and in drawing up its proposals, the Commission shall take into account the work and recommendations of the European Parliament, in accordance with the terms of the declaration annexed to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management.
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti
Proposal for a Council decision on the system of the European Communities' own resources
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/1999
on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999
IZJAVA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN KOMISIJE.........................................................6
DECLARATION DU PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET DE LA COMMISSION.........................6
MNENJE ODBORA ZA ZAPOSLOVANJE IN SOCIALNE ZADEVE ....................................7
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ................7
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Sveta (9077/2006)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation (9077/2006)
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Sveta za privolitev Parlamenta na podlagi člena 161 Pogodbe ES ( C6‑0192/2006 ),
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 161 of the EC Treaty ( C6‑0192/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju izjave Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije,
– having regard to the European Parliament and Commission statement,
– ob upoštevanju člena 75(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 75(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6‑0224/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0224/2006 ),
IZJAVA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN KOMISIJE
DECLARATION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COMMISSION
„Brez poseganja v medinstitucionalni sporazum in veljavne predpise (2007-2013) bo Komisija od leta 2010 dalje predstavila proračunskemu organu oceno izvajanja kohezijske politike v programskem obdobju 2007-2013, ki vključuje posledice uporabe pravila N+3/N+2“.
‘Without prejudice to the Interinstitutional Agreement and the rules in force (2007-2013), from 2010 the Commission will present the budgetary authority with an assessment of implementation of cohesion policy during the 2007-2013 programme period, including the consequences of application of the N+3/N+2 rule.’
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/1999
on the proposal for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999
Osnutek tega predloga je bil pripravljen kot del kohezijskega zakonodajnega paketa.
This proposal has been drafted as part of the cohesion legislative package.
Ta paket sestavljajo uredba o Evropskem socialnem skladu, uredba Kohezijskem skladu in uredba o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj.
The package consists of a Regulation on the European Social Fund, a Regulation on the Cohesion Fund and a Regulation on the European Regional Development Fund.
V njem so opredeljeni cilji h katerim bodo prispevali Strukturni skladi, merila upravičenosti držav članic in regij do sredstev iz teh skladov, razpoložljiva finančna sredstva in merila za njihovo dodeljevanje.
It defines the objectives to which the Structural Funds are to contribute, the criteria for Member States and regions to be eligible under those Funds, the financial resources available and the criteria for their allocation;
V luči zgoraj povedanega in zaradi neposrednega pomena te splošne uredbe za Evropski socialni sklad menimo, da postopek, ki ga je izbrala Komisija (AVC), po nepotrebnem omejuje vlogo Parlamenta.
We consider, in the light of the above, and of the direct relevance of this general Regulation for the European Social Fund, that the procedure chosen by the Commission (AVC) unduly limits the Parliament's role.
Četudi je izbrani postopek s stališča pogodb pravno ustrezen, evropski državljani prosijo za več preglednosti in več sodelovanja njihovih predstavnikov pri sprejemanju tako pomembnega zakonodajnega predloga.
Even if it is legally correct from the point of view of the Treaties, European citizens are asking for more transparency and more participation of their representatives in the adoption of such an important legislative proposal.
Še posebej bi radi opozorili na dejstvo, da Parlamenta ne bi smeli siliti v sprejetje sklepa z enim samim glasovanjem in brez možnosti vlaganja predlogov sprememb.
We draw particular attention to the fact that the Parliament should not be made to take a decision by means of a single vote and with no possibility of tabling amendments.
Naš odbor je zato pristojni odbor zaprosil, naj sklene uporabiti člen 75(3) Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta, poleg tega pa je sprejel mnenje za vmesno poročilo Evropskega parlamenta, da bi olajšal pozitivni izid postopka.
Our committee therefore asked the committee responsible to decide to apply article 75(3) of the European Parliament Rules of Procedure and in order to facilitate a positive outcome of the procedure adopted an opinion for the European Parliament Interim report.
Evropski parlament je vmesno poročilo sprejel 6. julija 2005.
The European Parliament adopted the Interim Report on 6 July 2005.
Svet je 5. maja 2006 sprejel politični dogovor, ki vključuje nekatera stališča EP glede te uredbe.
On 5 May 2006 Council adopted a political agreement incorporating some EP points of views on this regulation.
Upoštevajoč, da je Svet v svoj politični dogovor o uredbi o Evropskem socialnem skladu v celoti vključil glavne pomisleke našega odbora glede te uredbe, predlagamo, da Parlament da svojo privolitev k splošni uredbi o splošnih določbah o ERSS, ESS in Kohezijskem skladu.
Taking into account, that the Council has fully incorporated in its political agreement on the European Social Fund regulation the main concerns of our committee on this regulation, we propose that Parliament gives its assent on the General regulation laying down general provisions on the ERDF Fund, the ESF Fund and Cohesion Fund.
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za regionalni razvoj kot pristojni odbor, da Parlamentu priporoči, naj da svojo privolitev.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament gives its assent.
Predlog uredbe Sveta o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/1999
Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999