natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da ne bodo izvedle predhodne ocene poplavne ogroženosti iz člena 4 za tista povodja, porečja ali obalna območja, za katera so:
Member States may decide not to undertake the preliminary flood risk assessment referred to in Article 4 for those river basins, sub-basins or coastal areas where they have either:
(a) že pred 22. decembrom 2010 opravile oceno ogroženosti, da bi ugotovile, ali obstaja velika poplavna ogroženost ali utemeljena verjetnost, da bi se ta lahko pojavila, na podlagi katere bi območje umestili med območja iz člena 5(1), ali
(a) already undertaken a risk assessment to conclude, before 22 December 2010 , that a potential significant flood risk exists or might be reasonably considered likely to occur leading to the identification of the area among those referred to in Article 5(1) or
(a) že pred ...* opravile oceno ogroženosti, da bi ugotovile, ali obstaja velika poplavna ogroženost ali utemeljena verjetnost, da bi se ta lahko pojavila, na podlagi katere bi območje umestili med območja iz člena 5(1), ali
(a) already undertaken a risk assessment to conclude, before ...*, that a significant flood risk exists or might be considered likely to occur leading to the identification of the area among those referred to in Article 5(1) or
(b) pred 22. decembrom 2010 sklenile, da bodo pripravile karte poplavne nevarnosti in karte poplavne ogroženosti ter načrte za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti v skladu z ustreznimi določbami te direktive.
(b) decided, before 22 December 2010 , to prepare flood hazard maps and flood risk maps and to establish flood risk management plans in accordance with the relevant provisions of this Directive.
(b) pred ...* sklenile, da bodo pripravile karte poplavne nevarnosti in karte poplavne ogroženosti ter načrte za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti v skladu z ustreznimi določbami te direktive.
(b) decided, before ...* , to prepare flood hazard maps and flood risk maps and to establish flood risk management plans in accordance with the relevant provisions of this Directive.
Države članice lahko sklenejo uporabiti karte poplavne nevarnosti in karte poplavne ogroženosti, dokončno oblikovane pred 22. decembrom 2010 , če te vsebujejo enakovredne informacije, kot to zahteva člen 6 .
Member States may decide to make use of flood hazard maps and flood risk maps finalised before 22 December 2010 , if such maps provide a level of information equivalent to the requirements of Article 6 .
Države članice lahko sklenejo uporabiti karte poplavne nevarnosti in karte poplavne ogroženosti, dokončno oblikovane pred ...* , če te vsebujejo informacije, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve te direktive .
Member States may decide to make use of flood hazard maps and flood risk maps finalised before ...*, if such maps provide a level of information that fulfils the requirements of this Directive .
Države članice lahko sklenejo uporabiti načrte za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti, dokončno oblikovane pred 22. decembrom 2010 , če je vsebina teh načrtov enaka zahtevam za načrt iz člena 7 .
Member States may decide to make use of flood risk management plans finalised before 22 December 2010 , provided the content of these plans is equivalent to the requirements set out in Article 7 .
Države članice lahko sklenejo uporabiti načrte za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti, dokončno oblikovane pred ...* , če je vsebina teh načrtov enaka zahtevam za načrt iz te direktive .
Member States may decide to make use of flood risk management plans finalised before ...*, provided the content of these plans is equivalent to the requirements set out in this Directive .
* Datum začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
* Date of entry into force of this Directive .
Podaljšanje prehodnega obdobja do leta 2010 ni smiselno, saj se to ne sklada s pojmom podaljšane veljavnosti in bi lahko zaobšli cilj direktive.
An extension of the transitional period until 2010 is not appropriate, as it would not be in line with the principle of protecting existing work and there would be a risk of the Directive's objectives being circumvented.
Spremenjeno besedilo zahteva, da so vključeni tudi cilji te direktive, določeni ob morebitni spremembi priloge ("te direktive").
Changes to the structure of the Directive mean that it is necessary to take account of the objectives resulting from any amendment of the Annex ('this Directive').
Ponovno je vloženo besedilo iz prve obravnave (prej člen 17 (2)).
The wording from the first reading, 'fulfils', has been used (ex Article 17(2)).
Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o izvajanju te direktive najpozneje do 22. decembra 2018, nato pa vsakih šest let.
The Commission shall, by 22 December 2018, and every six years thereafter, submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the implementation of this Directive.
Pri pripravi poročila se upoštevajo vplivi podnebnih sprememb.
The impact of climate change shall be taken into account in drawing up this report.
Stališče Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi (prej člen 19).
This reflects Parliament's position at first reading (ex Article 19).
Zlasti pri tej direktivi se ne sme zanemariti škodljivih vplivov podnebnih sprememb in jih je zato treba na tem mestu izrecno omeniti.
The negative impact of climate change should not be ignored by this directive and should be mentioned explicitly at this point.
Priloga, naslov A, razdelek I, točka 4 a (novo)
Annex, heading A, section I, point 4 a (new)
4a) opredelitev prednostnih ukrepov, ki spodbujajo preprečevanje škode v skladu s cilji "neposlabšanja" in/ali "dobrega ekološkega, kemijskega in količinskega stanja" iz Direktive 2000/60/ES, kot so :
4a) a prioritisation of the measures that promote the prevention of damage according to the "non- deterioration" and/or "good ecological, chemical and quantitative status" objectives of Directive 2000/60/EC such as:
- zaščita mokrišč in poplavnih površin,
- protecting wetlands and floodplains,
- obnova propadajočih mokrišč in poplavnih površin (vključno z rečnimi meandri), predvsem tistih, ki ponovno povezujejo reke z njihovimi poplavnimi površinami,
- restoring degraded wetlands and floodplains (including river meanders), especially those that reconnect rivers with their floodplains,
- odstranitev zastarelih rečnih infrastruktur za zaščito pred poplavami,
- removing obsolete flood defence infrastructures from rivers,
- preprečevanje nadaljnjih gradenj (infrastrukture, stanovanjskih objektov itd.) na poplavnih površinah,
- preventing further construction (infrastructures, housing, etc.) in floodplains,
- spodbujanje gradbenih ukrepov za posodobitev že obstoječih stavb (kot je temeljenje s piloti),
- promoting construction measures to upgrade existing buildings (such as pile foundation),
- podpiranje praks trajnostne rabe tal v povodjih, kot je ponovno pogozdovanje, z namenom izboljšanja naravnega zadrževanja vode in obnavljanja podzemne vode,
- supporting sustainable land use practices in catchment areas, such as reforestation, in order to improve natural water retention and groundwater recharge,
- predhodna odobritev ali registracija stalnih dejavnosti na poplavnih površinah, kot sta gradnja in industrijski razvoj.
- prior authorisation or registration for permanent activities in floodplains such as construction and industrial development.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe iz prve obravnave (predlog spremembe 37).
Reinstatement of the amendment from the first reading (amendment 37).
Glej obrazložitev člena 7, odstavek 2 (Lienemann).
See justification to Article 7, paragraph 2 (Lienemann).
Komisija je sprejela svoj predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ocenjevanju in obvladovanju poplav 18. januarja 2006.
The Commission adopted its proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of floods on 18 January 2006.
Evropski parlament je v prvi obravnavi predloga podal svoje mnenje 13. junija 2006.
The European Parliament delivered its opinion at first reading on 13 June 2006.
Odbor regij je sklenil, da ne bo podal mnenja.
The Committee of the Regions decided not to deliver an opinion.
Ekonomsko-socialni odbor je dal svoje mnenje 17. maja 2006.
The Economic and Social Committee delivered its opinion on 17 May 2006.
Svet je sprejel svoje skupno stališče 23. novembra 2006.
The Council adopted its common position on 23 November 2006.
Namen te direktive je vzpostaviti zakonodajni okvir za oceno in obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti v Skupnosti, da se zaščiti zdravje ljudi, okolje, kulturna dediščina in gospodarske dejavnosti.
The directive's aim is to create a legislative framework for the assessment and management of flood risks in order to protect human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity.
Za uresničitev tega cilja je bil izbran tristopenjski pristop.
This aim is to be achieved by means of a three-stage approach.
Najprej se opravi ocena poplavne ogroženosti, da se določijo ogrožena območja, nato se pripravijo karte poplavne ogroženosti in končno se izdelajo načrti za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti v povodjih.
First, there will be an initial flood risk assessment to identify areas at risk, followed by flood mapping and, thirdly, by the drawing-up of flood risk management plans for river basins.
Zaradi različnih geografskih in hidroloških razmer ter različne poselitvene strukture direktiva državam članicam omogoča veliko mero prilagodljivosti pri določanju zahtevane ravni zaščite in ustreznih izvedbenih ukrepov.
In view of the differing geographical and hydrological conditions and settlement structures in the Member States, the directive grants them a considerable degree of flexibility in determining the required level of protection and the measures to be taken.
Spremembe skupnega stališča:
Changes introduced by the common position:
Pri tem se je zaradi skupnega stališča bistveno spremenila struktura direktive.
The common position also significantly alters the structure of the directive.
Različica Sveta je deloma prispevala k jasnejši strukturiranosti, vendar pa niso bile sprejete pomembne spremembe, ki jih je predlagal Parlament, ali so bile sprejete le v omiljeni obliki.
Although the Council's version brings structural clarity in some places, it has failed to incorporate some of Parliament's important amendments or has watered them down.
Po mnenju poročevalca je treba skupno stališče Sveta spremeniti tako, da se odpravijo jezikovne nejasnosti in pravno nenatančne formulacije, predvsem pa se ponovno predložijo predlogi sprememb iz prve obravnave v Parlamentu.
Not only should the Council common position be altered to rectify some instances of unclear use of language and legally imprecise wording but a series of amendments from Parliament's first reading should also be reintroduced.
Poročevalec meni, da so za sprejetje skupnega stališča nujno potrebne nadaljnje izboljšave, kot je razvidno iz naslednjih točk:
Before the rapporteur can accept the common position, it is essential that further improvements are made, as the following makes clear:
1) Podnebne spremembe:
1) Climate change:
Glede na očitne podnebne spremembe in javno razpravo, ki jo sprožajo, se poročevalcu zdi nerazumljivo, da že pri predhodni oceni poplavne ogroženosti ne bi ustrezno ocenili in upoštevali vplivov podnebnih sprememb na poplavno ogroženost.
Evidence of climate change and the public debate it is provoking mean that it is incomprehensible not to suitably assess and take account of its impact on the risk of flooding in the preliminary flood risk assessment.
Seveda se poročevalec zaveda, da za predhodno oceno ogroženosti ni mogoče pridobiti izčrpnih novih podatkov; vendar je treba uporabiti razpoložljive podatke.
The rapporteur is aware that no extensive new data can be produced for a preliminary assessment, but use should be made of existing data.
Evropskim državljanom pa bi le težko pojasnili neupoštevanje podnebnih sprememb pri tako temeljni oceni.
It will not be easy to explain to European citizens that the issue of climate change has been ignored in this fundamental assessment.
Da bi postopek potekal gladko, so ponovno predlagani prvotni roki za zaključek priprav.
To ensure a fast-moving procedure, the original deadlines for the completion of preliminary work should be reintroduced.
Poročevalec je v nasprotju s Svetom prepričan, da so potrebne spremembe glede ohranitve podatkov, pridobljenih v že opravljenih pripravah v državah članicah.
Unlike the Council, the rapporteur is convinced that changes are needed with regard to the preliminary work carried out by the Member States in order to protect existing work.
Zato so bili tudi vloženi predlogi sprememb iz prve obravnave.
For this reason, amendments from the first reading are being re-tabled.
Poročevalec meni, da podaljšanje klavzule o ohranitvi podatkov do leta 2010, torej po začetku veljavnosti te direktive, ni smiselno, saj to ne ustreza duhu ohranitve podatkov, hkrati pa bi bilo mogoče zaobiti cilje te direktive.
It would not be advisable to extend the validity of the clause on existing work until 2010 i.e. beyond the date on which the directive enters into force, as this would not be in line with the principle of protecting existing work and there would be a risk of the directive's objectives being circumvented.
4) Uskladitev z okvirno direktivo o vodah
4) Coordination with the Water Framework Directive:
V skupnem stališču Sveta je glede na usklajevanje med predlagano direktivo in Direktivo 2000/60/ES ter njuno vključevanje bila črtana obveznost tesnega usklajevanja in je postala izbirna.
With regard to coordination and integration between this directive and Directive 2000/60/EC, the Council common position removes the requirement for close coordination, making it optional.
Po mnenju poročevalca si je treba pri pripravi kart poplavne ogroženosti in poplavne nevarnosti prizadevati za usklajenost z okvirno direktivo o vodah.
Coordination with the Water Framework Directive should be the aim when drawing up flood risk and hazard maps.
Vključitev kart je še naprej neobvezna.
Integration of the maps into the Framework Directive is, however, to remain optional.
5) Zadrževalna območja in možnosti za ublažitev poplav
5) Retention areas and flood mitigation potential:
6) Povezovanje politik
6) Policy integration:
Za doseganje učinkovitosti obvladovanja poplavne ogroženosti mora biti to povezano z drugimi ustreznimi politikami.
In order to achieve efficient flood risk management, it has to be integrated with other relevant policies.
7) Načelo solidarnosti
7) Solidarity principle:
Poslanci opažajo, da je treba to načelo izrecno vključiti za gorvodno in dolvodno ležeče države oziroma regije.
Members see a need to include this principle explicitly for upstream and downstream countries/ regions.
8) Pravica do nadaljevanja
8) Right of continuance:
Poročevalec in nekaj poslancev si prizadeva za okrepitev ideje, ki državam članicam omogoča uporabo že obstoječega dela.
The rapporteur and some Members seek to strengthen the idea of allowing member States to use already existing work.
9) Učinkovitost infrastrukture za zaščito pred poplavami
9) Effectiveness of flood defences:
Nekateri poslanci ponovno predlagajo oceno gospodarske in okoljske učinkovitosti.
An assessment on the economic and environmental effectiveness is reintroduced by some Members.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o udeležbi Skupnosti v povečanju kapitala Evropskega investicijskega sklada
on the proposal for a Council decision on the Community participation in the capital increase of the European Investment Fund
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0621 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0621 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 3 Sklepa Sveta 94/375/ES z dne 6. junija 1994 o članstvu Skupnosti v Evropskem investicijskem skladu
– having regard to Article 3 of Council Decision 94/375/EC of 6 June 1994 on Community membership of the European Investment Fund
UL L 173, 7.7.1994, str.
OJ L 173, 7.7.1994, p.
12. , v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0426/2007 ),
12 , pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0426/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6-0065/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0065/2007 ),
Evropski investicijski sklad je bil ustanovljen leta 1994 na podlagi člena 308 pogodbe o ES.
The European Investment Fund was created in 1994 on the basis of Article 308 of the EC Treaty.
Njegova naloga je pripomoči k doseganju ciljev Skupnosti s podeljevanjem jamstev in tveganega kapitala podjetjem; Sklad svoje dejavnosti osredotoča zlasti na mala in srednje velika podjetja.
Its task is to contribute to the pursuit of Community objectives by means of provision of guarantees and venture capital to enterprises; the Fund focuses its operations on SMEs in particular.
EIS ne zagotavlja sredstev neposredno podjetjem - v svojih dejavnostih z lastnimi sredstvi deluje preko finančnih posrednikov, kot so skladi tveganega kapitala ali jamstvene ustanove.
The EIF does not provide funds directly to firms - as far as its own-resources operations are concerned, it operates through financial intermediaries such as venture capital funds or guarantee institutions.
V zadnjih letih se je dobiček EIS nenehno povečeval, Sklad pa izgub ni odpisoval, kljub temu pa se te možnosti v prihodnjih letih ne sme izključiti.
In recent years, EIF profits have been rising constantly and the fund has not written off losses; however, the possibility of incurring losses cannot be excluded in the coming years.
V skladu s svojim statutom EIS deluje na območju držav članic EU in držav pristopnic, kot tudi v sosednjih državah, ko gre za čezmejne projekte.
According to its Statutes, the EIF operates on the territory of the Member States of the EU and the accession countries, as well as in adjacent countries insofar as cross-border projects are involved.
Nominalna vrednost vpisanega kapitala znaša 2.000 milijonov EUR (2000 delnic, vsaka ima nominalno vrednost 1 milijon EUR), stopnja vplačanega kapitala pa je določena na 20 %.
Nominal value of the capital subscribed amounts to EUR 2 000 million (2000 shares of nominal value of 1 million EUR each), and the level of the paid-in capital has been established at 20%.
Delničarji EIS so Evropska investicijska banka, Evropska skupnost, ki jo predstavlja Evropska komisija, in druge finančne institucije.
Shareholders of the EIF are the European Investment Bank, the European Community represented by the European Commission and a number of financial institutions.
Trenutno ima Skupnost v lasti 30 % delnic EIS.
At present, the Community holds 30% of the EIF shares.
Povzetek in pripombe k predlogu
Summary and comments on the proposal
Glede na pridobljene informacije, bo EIS lastna sredstva izčrpal do sredine leta 2007.
According to the information received, the EIF will have exhausted its own resources by mid-2007.
Predlagano je povečanje kapitala Sklada, da bi zagotovili nadaljevanje njegovih dejavnosti in nalog, povezanih z lastnimi sredstvi (po pravilih o sovlaganju).
It is now proposed to increase the capital of the Fund in order to ensure continuation of its own-resources operations and mandates (co-investment rules).
Predlog predvideva 50-odstotno povečanje kapitala s povišanjem nominalne vrednosti vpisanega kapitala do 3.000 milijonov EUR in z izdajo 1000 novih delnic z nominalno vrednostjo 1 milijon EUR.
The increase proposed aims at raising the capital by 50%, through increasing the nominal value of the subscribed capital up to EUR 3 000 million and issuing 1000 new shares of nominal value of 1 million EUR.
Komisija bi jih odkupila obdobju štirih let (2007–2010) in bi do konca leta 2010 obdržala 30-odstotni lastniški delež.
Their purchase by the Commission would be spread over a four-year period (2007-2010), so that by the end of 2010 its participation level would be maintained at 30%.
Treba je omeniti, da je s proračunskega vidika dejanska cena delnic drugačna od nominalne in je odvisna od uspešnosti Sklada.
As far as the budgetary aspects are concerned, it should be noted that the actual price to be paid for the shares is different from the nominal price, and depends on the performance of the Fund.
Zato se proračunske potrebe lahko ocenijo le na podlagi razmer v preteklosti.
Therefore, the budgetary needs can only be estimated on the basis of the situation in the past.
V naslednji tabeli je predstavljen približen izračun.
An approximation has been presented in the table below.
Tabela: Okvirna porazdelitev števila delnic in proračunske potrebe, povezane s predlaganim povečanjem kapitala EIS (ocena, ki jo je treba potrditi s prihodnjimi rezultati Sklada)
Table: Indicative breakdown of number of shares and budgetary needs related to the proposed increase of EIF capital (estimation, to be verified against the future results of the Fund)
Okvirno število delnic, ki jih bodo vpisali delničarji
Indicative number of shares to be subscribed by the shareholders
Okvirno število delnic, ki jih bo vpisala Komisija
Indicative number of shares to be subscribed by the Commission
Okvirna letna cena delnice (v EUR)
Indicative annual share price (in EUR)
Okvirne proračunske potrebe (v EUR)
Indicative budgetary need (in EUR)
Vir: Priloga k predlogu Sklepa Sveta (KOM(2006)621)
Source: Annex to the proposal for a council decision (COM (2006)621)
Stroške nakupa delnic s strani Skupnosti bosta krila dva finančna vira:
There would be two financial sources for covering the cost of purchase of the shares by the Community:
§ prvič, glede na najnovejše finančno načrtovanje, ki ga je sporočila Komisija 26. januarja 2007, je v proračunski vrstici 01 04 09 proračuna Skupnosti za obdobje 2007–2010 predviden skupni znesek v višini 100 milijonov EUR - 25 milijonov EUR letno - za financiranje nakupa novo izdanih delnic EIS.
§ Firstly, according to the latest Financial Programming, as communicated by the Commission on 26 January 2007, an overall amount of EUR 100 million over the period 2007-2010 - EUR 25 million per year - has been foreseen in the Community budget for the purpose of financing the purchase of the newly issued EIF shares under budget line 01 04 09.
To načrtovanje je enako prejšnjemu, objavljenemu maja 2006, in ga je treba pozdraviti.
This programming is identical to the previous one, of May 2006, which is to be welcomed.
§ drugič, predlagano je, da se preostale stroške krije z dividendami EIS, ki jih prejme Skupnost (proračunska vrstica 850), in bodo obravnavane kot namenski prihodki v smislu člena 18(2) finančne uredbe.
§ Secondly, it is proposed that the remaining cost be covered by dividends from EIF perceived by the Community (budget line 850), which would be treated as assigned revenue in terms of Article 18(2) of the Financial Regulation.
Vsote denarja, ki jih bodo omogočile dividende, in ceno delnice lahko ocenimo le na podlagi pretekle uspešnosti EIS.
The amounts available from the dividends, just like the price of the shares, can only be estimated on the basis of the performance of the EIF in the past.
Komisija je ocenila, da bodo ta finančna sredstva zadostna in da se bodo v primeru velikega povišanja cen delnic, povezani stroški pokrili z vzporednim povišanjem dividend.
The Commission has evaluated that these financial sources should prove sufficient, and in the event of a significant increase in the price of shares, the related costs could be compensated by a parallel increase in dividends.
Poročevalec predlaga sprejetje predloga Komisije, ki dovoljuje povečanje kapitala in uporabo dividend v ta namen, brez sprememb.
Your rapporteur proposes to approve the Commission's proposal without amendments, allowing for the capital increase and use of the dividends for this purpose.
Zdi se, da Evropski investicijski sklad zadovoljivo opravlja svoje naloge, zato mu je treba omogočiti finančna sredstva, da bo svoje delo še naprej opravljal v skladu s cilji Skupnosti na področju gospodarskega razvoja, malih in srednje velikih podjetij ter inovacij.
Indeed, the EIF seems to fulfil its tasks in a satisfactory manner, so financial means should be made available for it to continue its activity, in line with the Community's objectives in the field of economic development, SMEs and innovations.