natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– subsidiarnost, ki temelji na členu 5 Pogodbe ES, zagotavlja pluralnost držav članic in različnih tradicij v EU, ter čim bolj učinkovito in demokratično ukrepanje EU, vendar le takrat, ko to privede do boljšega rezultata kot ukrepi na nacionalni ali pod-nacionalni ravni,
– subsidiarity, based on Article 5 of the EC Treaty, ensuring the plurality of the Member States and the different traditions in the EU and that the EU acts as efficient and close as possible to the citizens, when, but only when, this will achieve a better result than actions on the national or sub-national level,
– sorazmernost, v skladu s katero noben ukrep Skupnosti ne sme prekoračiti okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje ciljev pogodbe in
– proportionality, according to which any action by the Community shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaty, and
– demokracija, v okviru katere so neposredne splošne volitve podlaga za legitimnost nacionalnih in lokalnih oblasti, ki določajo in organizirajo naloge splošnega pomena, zagotavljanje storitev in financiranje storitev splošnega pomena.
– democracy, under which universal suffrage is the source of legitimacy for the national and local public authorities which determine and organise the missions, service provision and funding of services of general interest (SGIs).
B ker so storitve splošnega pomena ne le pomemben sestavni del socialne in gospodarske kohezije, ampak tudi znatno prispevajo h konkurenčnosti evropskega gospodarstva,
B whereas, SGIs are not only an important element of social and economic cohesion, but also contribute considerably to the competitiveness of the European economy,
C . ker je konkurenca, ki je namenjena lajšanju dokončne vzpostavitve enotnega trga na podlagi pravil socialno tržnega gospodarstva in je urejena z uredbami o konkurenci, ključna demokratična pravica ne le za omejitev moči birokracije ampak predvsem zlorabe gospodarske moči in varstvo pravic potrošnikov,
C . whereas competition, which is intended to facilitate the completion of the single market based on the rules of social market economy and is regulated by competition regulations, is a key democratic right, curbing not only bureaucratic power but above all the misuse of economic power and protecting consumers' rights ,
D. ker je sodna praksa Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti sedaj obsežna, se stalno razvija in zadeva različne vidike storitev splošnega pomena, vključno z državno pomočjo, enakim obravnavanjem in/ali izkrivljanjem konkurence,
D. whereas the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities is now extensive, is continually developing and concerns various aspects of SGIs, including State aids, equal treatment and/or the distortion of competition ,
E. ob upoštevanju razpleta zadev pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti, ki so povezane z združljivostjo storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena s pravili notranjega trga in evropskimi pravili o konkurenci, ter ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se je na to treba odzvati s pojasnitvijo ustreznega pozitivnega evropskega prava,
E. having regard to the development in the cases brought before the Court of Justice relating to the compatibility of SGIs with the internal market rules and European competition rules, and having regard to the need to respond to this by clarifying positive European law in this area ,
F. ker sta razvoj trgov in način organiziranja podjetij podvržena dinamiki, ki je različna v vsaki državi članici, bi uporaba togih pravil in opredelitev predstavljala oviro za doseganje najboljših gospodarskih in socialnih rezultatov,
F. whereas the evolution of markets and the way in which societies organise themselves is subject to dynamic development which is different in each Member State, the application of rigid rules and definitions would constitute an obstacle to achieving optimal economic and social results,
G. ker je nemogoče enotno opredeliti storitve splošnega pomena v tako raznolikem socialnem in gospodarskem okolju, kot je okolje EU,
G. whereas it is impossible to define SGIs uniformly, in a social and economic environment as diverse as that of the EU,
H. ker je razpoložljivost učinkovitih storitev splošnega pomena sestavni del gospodarskega, družbenega in socialnega sistema vseh držav članic; ker se razpoložljivost bistveno razlikuje od države članice do države članice in ker mora cilj uspešne dokončne vzpostavitve skupnega trga Evropske unije omogočiti državam članicam uvedbo delujočih in učinkovitih storitev splošnega pomena, ki v celoti upoštevajo interes državljana v njegovi dvojni vlogi potrošnika storitev in davkoplačevalca kot tudi obveznosti držav članic, brez poseganja v svobodo lokalnih in regionalnih organov, da vzpostavijo in izvajajo naloge, povezane s kakovostjo, pogostostjo in dostopnostjo teh storitev,
H. whereas the availability of efficient SGIs is an integral part of the economic, societal and social systems of all Member States; whereas this availability varies considerably from Member State to Member State and whereas the objective of successfully completing the internal market should enable Member States to introduce effective and efficient SGIs, fully respecting the interest of the citizen in his dual role of consumer of services and taxpayer as well as the Member States responsibilities and without interfering in the freedom of local and regional authorities to establish and implement high-quality, frequency, affordability and accessibility of those services ,
I ker bi se morale storitve splošnega pomena in storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena zagotavljati na enak način v celotni EU; ker je cilj gospodarske in socialne kohezije zmanjšanje neenakosti v stopnjah razvoja različnih regij in spodbujanje splošnega skladnega razvoja EU, zlasti v novih državah članicah,
I whereas SGIs and services of general economic interest (SGEIs) should be provided equally in all parts of the EU; whereas economic and social cohesion has as its objective the reduction of disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the promotion of the overall harmonious development of the EU, especially in the new Member States,
J. ker ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti iz člena 5(2) pogodbe ES države članice in njihovi regionalni in/ali lokalni organi določijo storitve splošnega pomena, katere storitve so zajete in kako se organizirajo, financirajo, opravijo, vrednotijo in nadzorujejo, kar je treba v celoti upoštevati pri nadaljnji pripravi zakonodaje,
J. whereas, taking into account the principle of subsidiarity pursuant to Article 5(2) of the EC Treaty, it is for the Member States and their regional and/or local authorities to define their SGIs, to decide which services should be covered, and how they are organised, financed, delivered, evaluated and controlled, and this should be fully respected when drafting further legislation,
K. ker je treba izboljšati pravno varnost v zvezi z združljivostjo pravil notranjega trga in pravil o konkurenci z urejenim delovanjem storitev splošnega pomena, zato da se ustreznim nacionalnim, regionalnim in lokalnim organom omogoči dovolj svobode pri sprejemanju odločitev ter preprečijo spori in pravni postopki, ob upoštevanju notranjega trga in zgoraj navedene zakonodajne resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o storitvah na notranjem trgu ter jasnega izvajanja pravil notranjega trga in pravil o konkurenci,
K. whereas, in the matter of compatibility between internal market and competition rules and the smooth operation of SGIs, legal certainty must be created in order to give the relevant national, regional and local authorities the necessary room for manoeuvre to take decisions and avoid conflicts and legal proceedings, with due respect for the internal market and the Parliament's above-mentioned legislative resolution on services in the internal market as well as clear implementation of internal market and competition rules,
L. ker so sektorske direktive EU o storitvah splošnega gospodarskega pomena v omrežju povezanih gospodarskih panog in drugih sektorjih, v katerih je bilo doseženo ali uvedeno odprtje trga, bile uspešne pri zagotavljanju boljših storitev po nižjih cenah in zagotavljajo zanesljiv okvir,
L. whereas sectoral EC directives on SGEIs in network industries and other sectors in which market opening has been achieved or begun have been successful in providing better services at lower prices and provide a reliable framework,
M. ker veliko število pobud posameznih sektorjev za odprtje notranjega trga na področju storitev in zgoraj navedena resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o storitvah na notranjem trgu povečujeta možnosti za konkurenco in boljše delovanje tudi na področjih storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, kar še povečuje potrebo po pravni jasnosti v zvezi s storitvami splošnega pomena,
M. whereas the multitude of sector-specific initiatives relating to the opening of the internal market in the area of services and the Parliament's above-mentioned resolution on services in the internal market enlarges the opportunities for competition and better operation also in the areas of SGEIs, which underlines the need for legal clarity regarding SGIs,
N. ker storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena neposredno vplivajo na notranji trg storitev in so bili številni sektorji, ki zagotavljajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, uspešno modernizirani in integrirani v trg storitev; ker je bila integracija izvedena pod nadzorom in so jo spremljali ukrepi za zaščito splošnega interesa, zlasti koncept univerzalnih storitev;
N. whereas SGEIs have a direct effect on the internal market for services, and a number of sectors which provide SGEIs have been successfully modernised and integrated in these service markets; whereas this integration was achieved in a controlled way and accompanied by measures to protect the general interest, in particular the concept of universal services ,
O. ker člen 16 Pogodbe ES priznava pomembnost storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ker člen 43 do 49 Pogodbe ES zagotavlja pravno podlago za oblikovanje ukrepov Skupnosti na področju svobodnega zagotavljanja storitev; ker člena 86 in 87 Pogodbe ES ter sodna praksa Sodišča vsebujejo jasne smernice za obravnavo državne pomoči ter za način in višino financiranja storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena; ker je člen 95 Pogodbe ES ustrezna pravna podlaga za obravnavo vprašanj, povezanih s postopki javnih naročil in z njimi povezanimi zadevami;
O. whereas Article 16 of the EC Treaty recognises the importance of SGEIs, whereas Articles 43 to 49 of the EC Treaty provide a legal basis of the formulation of Community action with regard to the free provision of services; whereas Articles 86 and 87 of the EC Treaty and the case law of the Court of Justice give clear indications on how to deal with State aid, modalities and levels of funding of SGEIs; whereas Article 95 of the EC Treaty is the appropriate legal basis for dealing with issues related to public procurement procedures and matters related to these;
P. ker se člena 16 in 86(2) Pogodbe ES sicer nanašata na storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, vendar v Pogodbi ES ni njihove opredelitve; ker storitve splošnega pomena niso omenjene v Pogodbi ES, ampak jih je v svojem sporočilu uvedla šele Komisija, in ker se v skladu z zgoraj navedeno zakonodajno resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o storitvah na notranjem trgu storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena izvzamejo iz področja uporabe člena 16 direktive o storitvah in storitve splošnega pomena v celoti izvzamejo iz direktive o storitvah;
P. whereas, while Articles 16 and 86(2) of the EC Treaty refer to SGEIs, the EC Treaty offers no definition thereof; whereas SGIs are not referred to in the EC Treaty but were introduced only by the Commission in a communication and whereas, pursuant to the Parliament's above-mentioned legislative resolution on services in the internal market, SGEIs should be exempt from the scope of Article 16 of the Services Directive and SGIs are wholly exempt from the directive,
Q. ker se spodbuja različne oblike upravljanja in partnerstva med gospodarskimi subjekti, ki izvajajo tovrstne storitve, in mora to potekati ob upoštevanju pristojnosti držav članic pri opravljanju in priskrbi storitev v prid učinkovitih in visokokakovostnih storitev,
Q. whereas the different forms of administration and partnership between economic operators carrying out these services are being encouraged , and whereas this should occur in compliance with the responsibilities of the Member States regarding the provision and procurement of those services in the interests of effective and high‑quality,
R. ker je treba v ospredje postaviti cilj Skupnosti, da doseganje visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov poteka ob hkratnem doslednem upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti,
R. whereas the Community objective of a high level of consumer protection together with strict compliance with the principle of subsidiarity should be brought into sharper focus,
S. ker Listina o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije priznava in spoštuje dostop do storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, z namenom spodbujati socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo Unije,
S. whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union recognises and respects access to SGEIs with a view to promoting the social and territorial cohesion of the Union,
- načela subsidiarnosti,
– the principle of subsidiarity,
- vzpostavitve notranjega trga in potrebe po zagotavljanju visokokakovostnih storitev;
– the achievement of the internal market and the need to provide services of high quality;
4. poziva Komisijo, da Parlamentu predloži izčrpno analizo vplivov dosedanje liberalizacije, predvsem na položaj potrošnikov in prizadetih zaposlenih;
Requests that the Commission submit to Parliament a comprehensive analysis of the effects of liberalisation to date, in particular on the situation of consumers and the employees concerned;
8. meni, da mora biti cilj pravil o konkurenci izboljšati kakovost zagotavljanja storitev, izbiro potrošnikov in dostopnost cen ter izpolnitev drugih ciljev javnega pomena, vključno s trajnostnim razvojem;
Considers that the objective of competition rules should be to improve the quality of service provision, consumer choice and affordable prices and to realise other public interest objectives, including sustainable development;
10. opozarja, da Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti s sodno prakso in Komisija z razlago posameznih primerov določata veljavna pravila na tem področju in da še ni bila dosežena niti potrebna pravna varnost niti ustrezna transparentnost;
Recalls the fact that the rules in force in this area are defined by the case-law of the Court of Justice and by the Commission's, interpretation of individual cases, and that neither the necessary legal certainty nor adequate transparency has therefore yet been achieved;
– podjetij (javnih, pridobitnih ali nepridobitnih), ki opravljajo takšne storitve ali ponujajo njihovo opravljanje, da bi lahko vedela, katere pogoje in obveznosti jim lahko organi v skladu s pravili notranjega trga in veljavno zakonodajo naložijo v zvezi z nalogami splošnega pomena, ki so jim bile zaupane, in
– the (public, profit-making or non-profit-making) companies that provide or offer these services, in order that they might be aware what conditions and obligations can be imposed on them by the authorities under the internal market and the legislation in force, given the general interest missions that are entrusted to them, and
– uporabnikov storitev, da bi ti lahko bili prepričani, da se storitve, ki jih oblikujejo in razvijajo države članice in lokalni organi v skladu z lokalnimi pogoji, lahko zagotavljajo ob upoštevanju konkurence, kjer koli je to mogoče, dostopnosti, kakovosti, inovacij, prilagodljivosti, stalnosti, trajnosti, enake obravnave, dolgoročnega načrtovanja, varnosti, univerzalnosti itd.
– service users, in order that they can be certain that the services defined and developed by Member States and their local authorities in accordance with local conditions can be provided subject to proper conditions on competition, where possible, accessibility, quality, affordability, innovation, adaptability, continuity, durability, equality of treatment, long-term planning, safety, universality, etc.,
15. poziva Komisijo, da na področju socialnih in zdravstvenih storitev splošnega pomena izboljša pravno varnost in predloži predlog za direktivo Sveta in Parlamenta, specifično za sektor;
Calls on the Commission to create more legal certainty in the area of social and health care SGIs and to come forward with a proposal for a sector-specific directive of the Council and the Parliament and those fields where it is appropriate;
20. predlaga, da, ko se pristojni organ odloča o odobritvi nadomestila za opravljanje javnih storitev z namenom zagotoviti financiranje storitve splošnega pomena, to nadomestilo ne velja za državno pomoč v smislu člena 87 Pogodbe ES, če:
Recommends that, when a competent authority intends to grant compensation for the supply of public services in order to ensure the funding of a service of general interest, such compensation should not be considered State aid in the meaning of Article 87 of the EC Treaty, provided that:
- je upravičencu poverjena jasno opredeljena naloga javne storitve;
- the beneficiary is entrusted with a clearly defined public service mission;
- so parametri za izračun nadomestnih plačil določeni vnaprej na objektiven in transparenten način;
- the parameters for calculating the compensation payments is established in advance in an objective and transparent manner;
- višina nadomestila ne presega stroškov, ki so nastali ob razrešnici obveznosti javnih storitev, in omogoča razumen dobiček;
- the level of compensation does not exceed the costs incurred in the discharge of the public service obligations, allowing a reasonable profit;
- je upravičenec izbran z javnim razpisom ali nadomestilo ne presega stroškov dobro vodenega podjetja, ustrezno opremljenega s sredstvi za zagotavljanje javne storitve; in
- the beneficiary is chosen in a public tender or compensation does not exceed the costs of a well-run undertaking that is adequately equipped with the means to provide the public service; and
- je bil objavljen transparenten postopek;
- a transparent procedure has been issued;
vendar poudarja, da znesek nadomestila ne sme presegati tistega, kar je potrebno za opravljanje storitve in se z njim ne sme financirati dejavnosti, ki so izven obsega zadevne storitve (v obliki križnih subvencij); poudarja, da mora biti nadomestilo na razpolago vsem ponudnikom, ki so pooblaščeni za opravljanje storitev splošnega interesa, ne glede na njihov pravni status;
stresses, however, that the amount of compensation may not exceed what is necessary for the operation of the service and must not be used to finance activities outside the scope of the service in question (in the form of cross-subsidies); points out that compensation must be available to all operators entrusted with providing SGIs, irrespective of their legal status;
67. ; vendar poudarja, da plačilo čistega nadomestila za obveznosti javnih storitev ne sme biti obravnavano kot državna pomoč in da je treba zakon ustrezno spremeniti;
67. must be implemented clearly; emphasises, however, that the payment of pure compensation for public service obligations should not be deemed to be State aid, and that the law should be amended accordingly;
26. razen tega meni, da so zaradi večje transparentnosti in varstva potrošnikov na nacionalni in lokalni ravni potrebne smernice na naslednjih področjih:
Is also of the opinion that guidelines at national and local level are necessary in the following areas, in the interests of transparency and consumer protection:
– opredelitev postopkov za dostop do obstoječih omrežij, če je dostop potreben za zagotavljanje storitev;
– defining the procedures for access to existing networks where access is necessary for the provision of services;
– opredelitev cenovnih in/ali tarifnih pogojev za opravljanje storitev;
– defining the price and/or tariff conditions for the supply of services;
– zagotavljanje konkurence in možnosti za nove podjetnike, kjer je to mogoče;
– securing competition and opportunities for new entrepreneurs where possible ;
– predpisi za sporazumno poravnavo v primeru sporov med ponudnikom storitev in uporabnikom, ne glede na možnost vložitve pravnega sredstva; in
– rules on out-of-court settlements between the supplier of services and the user, regardless of the possibility of legal action; and
– posvetovanje in po potrebi obveščanje organov, pristojnih za konkurenco, o vsaki podrobnosti, ki bi lahko kazala na kršitev nacionalnih predpisov o konkurenci in tistih iz Pogodbe ES;
– consultation of and, as appropriate, referral to the competition authorities regarding any element that might point to a breach of the national competition rules or of those laid down in the EC Treaty;
– razvoj celovitih metod vrednotenja, vključno z gospodarskimi, družbenimi in okoljskimi merili;
– the development of comprehensive evaluation methods, including economic, social and environmental criteria, should be developed;
– zaščito in varnost uporabnikov storitev,
– the protection and safety of service users;
– primernost in sorazmernost standarda v odnosu do ciljev in stroškov storitve,
– the appropriateness and proportionality of the standard in relation to the cost of the service;
– čim bolj obsežno širjenje in objavljanje standarda in
– the widest possible dissemination and publication of the standard; and
– enostaven in učinkovit nadzor spoštovanja standarda, kar bi se lahko določilo na podlagi listine ali kodeksa ravnanja;
– simple and effective monitoring of adherence to the standard, which could be laid down on the basis of a charter or of a code of conduct;
29. poziva Komisijo, da na podlagi resolucije z dne 14. januarja 2004, resolucije z dne 9. marca 2005 o vmesnem pregledu lizbonske strategije
Calls on the Commission, on the basis of its resolution of 14 January 2004, its resolution of 9 March 2005 on the mid-term review of the Lisbon strategy
Pomen javnih storitev
The importance of public services
Dostop do visokokakovostnih javnih storitev je ključno politično vprašanje.
Access to high-quality public services is a key political issue.
Dobre šole in bolnišnice, čista voda, varen in zanesljiv prevoz ter energija se na primer pojavljajo pri večini opredelitev kakovostnega življenja.
Good schools and hospitals, clean water, safe and reliable transport and energy, for example, figure in most definitions of a good quality of life.
Vendar javne storitve niso le bistveni sestavni del kakovosti življenja posameznih državljanov.
However, public services are not only an essential element in the quality of life of individual citizens.
Imajo bistveno vlogo pri vodilni pobudi Lizbonske strategije EU, ki želi graditi na moči evropskega socialnega in gospodarskega modela, da bi ustvarila najbolj dinamično, povezano in trajnostno gospodarstvo na svetu.
They have a key role to play in the EU's flagship Lisbon strategy, which aims to build on the strengths of Europe's social and economic model to create the world's most dynamic, cohesive and sustainable economy.
Dobre javne storitve lahko prispevajo k premostitvi gospodarskega zastoja, socialne izključenosti in izolacije, krepitvi socialne in ozemeljske kohezije ter izboljšanju delovanja evropskega notranjega trga in njegove zunanje konkurenčnosti.
Good public services can help to overcome economic stagnation, social exclusion and isolation; strengthen social and territorial cohesion; and improve the functioning of Europe's internal market and its external competitiveness.
Visokokakovostne javne storitve, ki so odprte in transparentne ter v enaki meri dostopne za vse, so torej bistveni sestavni deli evropskega družbenega modela.
High-quality public services - open and transparent, with equal access for all - are therefore essential elements in the European model of society.
Trg sam se ne more vedno odzvati na dinamično naravo javnih storitev.
Market forces alone cannot respond always to the dynamic nature of public services.