natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Razen tega je bila pozorno preučena zamisel „vrnitve k staremu besedilu“, kot so zahtevale številne države članice v Svetu.
Fourthly, the idea 'to go back to the old text' as requested by many Member States in the Council was carefully examined.
Besedilo iz Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma (SIC) je bilo uporabljeno, kjer koli je bilo videti ustreznejše in popolnejše.
Text from the current Schengen Implementing Convention (SIC) was introduced wherever it appeared better and more complete.
Vprašanja za to uredbo in Sklep
Issues for the present Regulation and the Decision
III.1 Tehnične kopije
III.1 Technical copies
Po podrobni oceni je poročevalec pripravljen sprejeti nacionalne kopije (člen 4(3)).
Following a careful assessment the rapporteur is ready to accept national copies (Art. 4(3)).
Sprejme tudi tehnične kopije (člen 23), vendar le, če so te stalno na spletu ter zato vedno vsebujejo enake podatke kot centralni sistem in nacionalne kopije.
He also accepts technical copies (Art. 23) but only under the condition that these are constantly on-line and therefore at all times contain identical data as the central system and the national copies.
Kopiranje za tehnične namene, ki povzroča shranjevanje podatkov, ki niso na spletu (na primer na zgoščenkah), se mora končati eno leto po začetku delovanja VIS.
Copying for technical purposes which leads to data stored off-line (for example on CDs) must end one year after the start of operations of the VIS.
Medtem je treba uvesti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe (na primer vodenje evidence kopij, ki niso na spletu).
In the meantime, adequate safeguards have to be introduced (for example the keeping of an inventory of off-line copies).
Ravno tako je pomembno, da je iskanje v kopiji mogoče le z uporabo istih meril za iskanje kot v centralnem sistemu in da so rezultati iskanja v kopiji isti kot pri iskanju v centralnem sistemu (glej predloge sprememb členov 9 in 23).
It is equally important that a search in a copy can only be made by using the same search criteria as in the central system and that a search in a copy produces the same result as a search in the central system (see amendments to Art. 9 and 23).
III.2 Kakovost podatkov
III.2 Data quality
Kakovost podatkov SIS II je izredno pomembna za zagotovitev učinkovitosti sistema.
The quality of the SIS II data is of paramount importance to ensure the effectiveness of the system.
Do danes je bilo že veliko pritožb v zvezi s kakovostjo podatkov v SIS.
Up until today there have been numerous complaints about the quality of data in the SIS.
Posebna težava so podatki o državljanih EU ali njihovih družinskih članih.
The data of EU citizens or family members of EU citizens constitutes a particular problem.
Veliko predlogov za dodatno izboljšanje kakovosti podatkov je navedenih v členu 24.
A series of suggestions aiming to further improve data quality are introduced in Art. 24.
Ti vključujejo uvedbo uradnih in pisnih postopkov za zagotovitev, da so podatki zakonito obdelani, natančni in posodobljeni, obveznost predložitve sporov o natančnosti podatkov organom za varstvo podatkov, obveznost, da se države članice nemudoma obvestijo o spremembi statusa osebe, za katero je razpisan ukrep, in dokumentacijo pregledov.
These include the introduction of formal and written procedures to ensure that data is lawfully processed, accurate and up-to-date, the obligation to submit disputes about the accuracy of data to the data protection authorities, the obligation to inform the Member States immediately of the change of status of a person subject to an alert and the documentation of reviews.
Razen tega je uvedena obveznost izmenjave dopolnilnih podatkov za primere, ko oseba trdi, da ni oseba, za katero je razpisan ukrep.
Furthermore, an obligation to exchange supplementary information is introduced for cases in which a person claims not to be the person wanted by an alert.
Obdobje za preverjanje se podaljša z enega na dve leti, kar se zdi bolj realno.
Finally, the review period is prolonged from one to two years which appears to be more realistic.
Poročevalec je zaskrbljen, da bi se preveč ambiciozne obveznosti lahko neustrezno izvajale.
The rapporteur is afraid that overly ambitious obligations risk to be implemented in an improper way.
III.3 Biometrični podatki
III.3 Biometric data
Komisija predlaga vključitev biometričnih podatkov brez kakršne koli nadaljnje specifikacije o viru biometričnih podatkov in njihovi uporabi.
The Commission proposes the inclusion of biometrics without any further specification as to the source of the biometric data and its use.
V predlaganem členu 16a (novo) poročevalec uvaja nekatera osnovna pravila za zapolnitev te vrzeli: Biometrične podatke, vpisane v SIS II, je treba najprej pregledati glede kakovosti v skladu s standardom, ki ga določi komitologija, da se zmanjša nevarnost napak.
In his proposed Art. 16a new the rapporteur introduces certain basic rules to close this gap: Firstly, the biometric data entered into SIS II has to pass a quality check according to a standard to be established by comitology in order to reduce the risk of errors.
Razen tega je treba na tej začetni stopnji sistema izvzeti iskanje z uporabo biometričnih podatkov.
Secondly, a search with biometrics should be excluded at this initial stage of the system.
III.4 Medsebojno povezovanje
III.4 Interlinking
Biometrični podatki in medsebojno povezovanje razpisov ukrepov so novi elementi SIS II v primerjavi z zdajšnjim sistemom, kar bo okrepilo zmogljivost sistema.
Like biometrics the interlinking of alerts is a new element of SIS II in comparison to the current system which will enhance the system's capacities.
V prihodnje bo mogoče povezati na primer razpis ukrepa za ukraden avto z razpisom ukrepa za prijetje osebe.
In the future in will be possible to link, for example, the alert of a stolen car with the alert of a person wanted for arrest.
Če policist odkrije ukradeni avto, bo utemeljeno sumil, da je oseba, iskana zaradi prijetja, bila ali je še vedno v neposredni bližini tega avtomobila.
If a policeman then discovers the stolen car he will have grounds to believe that the person wanted for arrest was or still is in the immediate vicinity of this car.
Vendar je pomembno poudariti, da so povezave dopustne le, če obstajajo jasne operativne zahteve (glej predlog spremembe člena 26).
It is, however important to underline that links should only be made if they have clear operational requirements (see amendment to Art. 26).
III.5 Komunikacija z javnostjo
III.5 Communication with the public
Velika težava zdajšnjega SIS je pomanjkanje obveščanja javnosti.
A major problem with the current SIS is the lack of information to the public.
Zato se pojavlja veliko prikritih in pretiranih bojazni.
For this reason a lot of obscure and exaggerated fears persist.
Državljani v večini primerov niso obveščeni o svojih pravicah v zvezi s sistemom (na primer pravica zahtevati informacije in njihove popravke).
Citizens are mostly not informed about their rights in relation to the system (for example the right to request information and its correction).
Uvedba sistema SIS II se mora uporabiti kot priložnost za ustrezno obveščanje javnosti o njem.
The launch of SIS II should be used as an occasion for properly informing the public about the system.
To morajo izvajati Komisija in države članice ter se mora financirati iz proračuna SIS II.
This should be done by the Commission and the Member States and be financed out of the SIS II budget.
Takšne kampanje je treba redno ponavljati.
Such campaigns should be repeated on a regular basis.
Vzorec, iz katerega bi lahko izhajali, je kampanja za obveščanje o „pravicah letalskih potnikov“ s plakati na letališčih.
A model to be followed could be the information campaign on 'Air Passenger Rights' with its posters in airports.
Poročevalec pričakuje jasno zavezanost Komisije in držav članic tej zadevi.
The rapporteur expects a clear commitment from the Commission and the Member States on this issue.
III.6 Nadzor
III.6 Supervision
Najti je bilo treba nove predloge za sistem nadzora za uskladitev zdajšnjega sistema, vključno s Skupnim nadzornim organom (JSA), z razmerami spremenjenega pravnega in institucionalnega okvira.
New proposals for the system of supervision had to be found in order to reconcile the current system including the Joint Supervisory Authority (JSA) with the realities of a modified legal and institutional context.
Zaradi tega je imel poročevalec veliko sestankov s predstavniki JSA in evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov (EDPS), da bi našli obojestransko zadovoljivo rešitev.
To this end the rapporteur had a series of meetings with representatives of the JSA and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) in order to find a mutually satisfactory solution.
Ta rešitev je zdaj predstavljena v predlogih sprememb členov 31, 31a (novo) in 31b (novo).
This solution is now brought forward in the amendments to Art. 31, 31a new and 31b new.
Glavni element tega sistema je pojem skupne odgovornosti.
The main element of this system is the concept of joint responsibility.
Narava SIS II zahteva tesno sodelovanje med nadzorniki, kar se tako najbolje doseže.
The nature of the SIS II requires close cooperation between supervisors which is best achieved in this way.
Predlogi so dopolnjeni s podrobnejšim opisom nalog nadzora, ki temelji na členu 115 SIC in zdajšnji praksi.
The proposals are supplemented by a more detailed description of the tasks of supervision which is based on Art. 115 SIC and current practice.
Poročevalec želi poudariti, da nadzor Komisije ni omejen na operativno vodenje, ampak je Komisija hkrati varuh pogodbe in zato tudi nadzornik.
Finally, the rapporteur wishes to stress that the Commission's rule is not limited to the operational management but that the Commission is at the same time the guardian of the Treaty and therefore also a supervisor.
Nujno je, da Komisija sprejme to vlogo, ker je ključni element učinkovitega nadzora.
It is essential that the Commission accepts this role because it constitutes a key element for an effective supervision.
Predlogi sprememb v zvezi s to vlogo Komisije so uvedeni v členih 14 in 34.
Amendments concerning this role of the Commission are introduced to Art. 14 and 34.
7 Lokacija in prihodnje upravljanje
7 Location and future management
Poročevalec je bil najprej pripravljen izključiti vprašanje lokacije in prihodnjega upravljanja iz razprave o zakonodajnem okviru.
The rapporteur was initially ready to exclude the issue of location and future management from the debate about the legislative framework.
Ker so države članice v Svetu vseeno sprožile to vprašanje in mu pripisale velik pomen, poročevalec ne nasprotuje njegovi vključitvi v ta zakonodajni instrument.
Since the Member States in the Council, however, raised this issue and attached great importance to it, the rapporteur has no objection to including it in this legislative instrument.
V zvezi z lokacijo poročevalec ne ugovarja mestoma Strasbourg in Sankt Johann im Pongau (glej predlog spremembe člena 4a (novo)).
As far as the physical location is concerned, the rapporteur has no objections against the sites of Strasbourg and Sankt Johann im Pongau (see amendment to Art. 4a new).
Vseeno mora biti operativno vodenje SIS II na teh krajih izključna odgovornost Komisije.
The operational management of the SIS II at these locations has to be, however, the sole responsibility of the Commission.
Poročevalec je trdno prepričan, da mora biti v prihodnje agencija Skupnosti
The rapporteur is of the firm opinion that in the future a community agency
To je Parlament vedno zahteval (glej Priporočilo o SIS II, sprejeto dne 20.11.2003). odgovorna za upravljanje vseh obsežnih sistemov IT, uvedenih za ustvarjanje področja svobode, varnosti in pravice (tj. tudi za Eurodac, ki ga zdaj upravlja Komisija, in za VIS).
This was always requested by Parliament (see recommendation on SIS II adopted on 20.11.2003). should be responsible for the management of all large-scale IT systems established for the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice (i.e. also for Eurodac which is currently managed by the Commission and for the VIS).
Za podrobnejšo razlago glej obrazložitev predloga spremembe k členu 12.
See the justification for the amendment to Art. 12 for a more detailed explanation.
Ta uredba
The present Regulation
1 Člen 15
1 Art. 15
Ugotovljene so bile resne težave s podatki razpisov ukrepov zdajšnjega člena 96 za namen zavrnitve vstopa in treba jih je obravnavati.
Serious problems were identified with the data of the current Art. 96 alerts for the purpose of refusing entry and need to be addressed.
Poročevalec zato pozdravlja predlog Komisije o tem členu.
The rapporteur therefore welcomes the Commission's proposal on this Article.
Predlaga nekatere predloge sprememb člena 15, katerih cilj je dodatno izboljšanje besedila.
He proposes some amendments to Article 15 which aim to further improve the text.
Želi okrepiti na primer pojme, da morajo razpisi ukrepov temeljiti na posamičnih ocenah in da jih bo treba uskladiti na ravni razpisa ukrepa SIS II.
He would like to strengthen, for example, the notions that alerts have to be based on an individual assessment and that alerts will have to be harmonised at SIS II alert level.
IV.2 Pravice do dostopa
IV.2 Access rights
Poročevalec se v osnovi strinja s pravicami do dostopa različnih organov, kot je predlagala Komisija.
The rapporteur basically agrees with the access rights to the various authorities as proposed by the Commission.
Nekateri predlogi sprememb členov 17 in 18 pojasnjujejo predvsem, kateri so zadevni organi.
Some amendments are proposed to Art. 17 and 18 essentially clarifying which the authorities concerned are.
V členu 18(1) poročevalec pojasnjuje, da morajo policijski organi tako kot danes imeti pravico dostopa do razpisov ukrepov zaradi zavrnitve vstopa, ker se je treba zavedati, da so te osebe lahko na ozemlju držav članic.
In Art. 18(1) the rapporteur makes clear that police authorities should like today have the right to access the alerts for the purpose of refusing entry because it has to be acknowledged that such persons can be on the territory of the Member States.
Vendar se poročevalec ne strinja s predlaganim dostopom organov, pristojnih za izdajo azila, zaradi določanja države članice, odgovorne za prošnjo za azil (predlog spremembe člena18(2)).
The rapporteur does, however, not agree with the proposed access to asylum authorities for the purpose of determining the Member State responsible for an asylum application (amendment to Art. 18(2)).
Utemeljitev za tak dostop je premalo verjetna.
The justification for such an access is too farfetched.
Razen tega poročevalec meni, da je treba dostop organov, pristojnih za izdajo azila, zaradi določanja, ali prosilec za azil „predstavlja grožnjo javnemu redu ali državni varnosti“ (člen 18(3)) in s tem – posredno – za pregled prošnje za azil, pojasniti z natančnimi razlogi, kot je navedeno v direktivi o izpolnjevanju pogojev.
In addition, the rapporteur is of the opinion that the access for asylum authorities for the purpose of determining whether an asylum seeker constitutes a 'threat to public order or internal security' (Art. 18(3)) and thereby - indirectly - for the examination of an asylum application should be clarified by referring to the precise grounds as given in the qualifications directive.
Objava – tudi na spletu – posodobljenega seznama organov z dostopom je zelo pomembna za preglednost in nadzor (glej predloge sprememb člena 21(3)).
The publication - also on the internet - of an up-to-date list of the authorities with access is very important for transparency reasons and supervision (see amendments to Art. 21(3)).
3 Obdobja ohranjanja
3 Conservation periods
Poročevalec predlaga triletni rok hrambe v skladu s triletnim obdobjem, ki je zdaj predvideno za pregled razpisov ukrepov iz člena 96 (člen 112(1) SIC).
The rapporteur proposes a three year retention period in accordance with the three year period currently foreseen for the review of Article-96 alerts (Art. 112(1) SIC).
Vseeno mora obstajati možnost podaljšanja obdobja za dve leti po oblikovanju posamične ocene.
There should, however, be the possibility to prolong the period by two more years following an individual assessment.
Če so po petih letih pogoji še vedno izpolnjeni, je treba vnesti nov razpis ukrepa.
If the conditions are still met after five years a new alert should be entered.
Skupaj s pregledom podatkov, predvidenih v členu 24(7), bi to pomenilo, da bi se razpisi ukrepov preverjali po dveh, treh in petih letih.
Together with the review of the data foreseen in Art. 24(7) this would mean that alerts would be checked after two, three and five years.
Poročevalec meni, da je to nujno za zagotovitev kakovosti podatkov v SIS II.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that this is necessary to ensure the quality of the data in the SIS II.
Poročevalec pri predlogu nadomestnega postopka odbora, ki bi Parlament in Svet bolj izenačil, sledi zdajšnjemu zgledu odbora LIBE.
The rapporteur follows the present line of the LIBE committee in proposing an alternative committee procedure which would put Parliament and Council on a more equal level.
Poročevalec se v celoti zaveda medinstitucionalnih razprav o tej zadevi, ki potekajo, vendar bo ohranil te predloge sprememb (člena 35), dokler se ne doseže zadovoljiva rešitev.
The rapporteur is fully aware of the ongoing interinstitutional discussions on this matter but will keep these amendments (to Art. 35) until a satisfactory solution is found.
Razen tega so nekateri deli priročnika SIRENE uvedeni v besedilo uredbe, ker velja za priročnik SIRENE postopek komitologije in ker po mnenju poročevalca v nekaterih delih ne predstavlja povsem tehničnih izvedbenih ukrepov.
In addition, certain parts of the SIRENE manual are introduced in the text of the Regulation because the SIRENE manual is subject to the comitology procedure and in the opinion of the rapporteur does in parts not represent purely technical implementing measures.
Poročevalec predlaga, da se organom za varstvo podatkov omogoči, da predložijo mnenje o osnutku izvedbenih ukrepov.
Finally, the rapporteur proposes to give the data protection authorities the possibility to deliver opinions on draft implementing measures.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen information system (SIS II)
Odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Committee(s) asked for opinion Date announced in plenary
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007
on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ............................................................................................35
OPINION of the Committee on Development .......................................................36
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................37
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................38
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 40
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 41
MNENJE Odbora za PETICIJE ...........................................................................................42
OPINION of the Committee on Petitions ...............................................................43
–...Sklepi Odbora za proračun na sejah ... o osnutkih dopolnitev za oddelke I, II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII (A) in VII (B) predloga splošnega proračuna
–...Decisions taken by the Committee on Budgets at its meetings of ... on the draft amendments to Sections I, II, IV, V, VI, VII and VIII(A) and VIII(B) of the draft general budget
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007, oddelek I – Evropski parlament, oddelek II – Svet, oddelek IV – Sodišče, oddelek V – Računsko sodišče, oddelek VI – Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor, oddelek VII – Odbor regij, oddelek VIII (A) – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, oddelek VIII (B) – Evropski varuh osebnih podatkov
on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007 - Section I - European Parliament, Section II - Council, Section IV - Court of Justice, Section V - Court of Auditors, Section VI - European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII - Committee of the Regions, Section VIII(A) - European Ombudsman, Section VIII(B) - European Data Protection Supervisor
- – ob upoštevanju člena 272 Pogodbe ES,
- having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2000/597/ES, Euratom z dne 29. septembra 2000 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti,
- having regard to Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities' own resources
- ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju,
- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
- ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka
- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. marca 2006 o smernicah za proračunski postopek za leto 2007 za oddelke II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII (A) in VIII (B) ter za predhodni predlog načrta odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta (oddelek 1),
- having regard to its resolution of 15 March 2006 on the guidelines for the 2007 budget procedure - Sections II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII (A) and VIII (B) and on the European Parliament's preliminary draft estimates (Section I) for the 2007 budget procedure
Sprejeta besedila s tem datumom, P6_TA(2006)0090 .
Texts adopted of that date , P6_TA(2006)0090 . ,
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. junija 2006 o načrtu prihodkov in odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta za proračunsko leto 2007,
- having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on the estimates of revenue and expenditure of the European Parliament for the financial year 2007
Sprejeta besedila s tem datumom, P6_TA(2006)0241 .
Texts adopted of that date , P6_TA(2006)0241 . ,
- ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007, ki ga je Komisija predložila 3. maja 2006 ( SEC(2006)0531 ),
- having regard to the preliminary draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007, which the Commission presented on 3 May 2006 ( SEC(2006)0531 ),
- ob upoštevanju predloga splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007, ki ga je Svet pripravil 14. julija 2006 ( C6-0300/2006 ),
- having regard to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007, which the Council established on 14 July 2006 ( C6-0300/2006 ),
- ob upoštevanju člena 69 in priloge IV svojega poslovnika,
- having regard to Rule 69 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino, Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter Odbora za peticije ( A6-0356/2006 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade, the Committee on Development, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0356/2006 ),