natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3. poudarja, da je treba v sporazum vključiti klavzulo o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji ter klavzuli glede socialnega ali okoljskega vprašanja, ki so zavezujoče, ter navesti mehanizme in instrumente, ki bodo zagotovili ustrezno izvajanje teh klavzul in v katerih bo o tem izvajanju posebej predvideno letno poročilo, ki ga bo za Evropski parlament pripravila Komisija;
Emphasises the need to ensure that the agreement includes, in binding form, the clause on human rights and democracy as well as the social and environmental clauses, and that these benefit from mechanisms and instruments that will guarantee their positive implementation, with provision being made for an annual report to the European Parliament on the monitoring by the Commission of their implementation;
8. ocenjuje, da bi se moralo v okviru sodelovanja EU nuditi podporo malim proizvajalcem ter na splošno malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, in poziva k naložbam v mala podjetja, saj bo odprtje evropskih trgov koristilo predvsem največjim proizvajalcem, ki so zmožni upoštevati evropske sanitarne in fitosanitarne standarde;
Takes the view that EU cooperation should support small-scale producers and small- and medium-sized enterprises in general, and urges that investment be made in small businesses since the opening-up of the European markets will essentially benefit larger-scale producers who are able to satisfy European sanitary and phytosanitary standards (SPS);
11. v zvezi z dostopom proizvodov do zadevnih trgov poudarja, da bi boljša sledljivost proizvodov pripomogla ne le k boljši kakovosti zdravstvenega varstva in zaščite okolja, ampak bi tudi bistveno povečala obseg pravične trgovine;
Emphasises with reference to product access in the respective markets, that improving the traceability of such products would result not only in a raising of health and environmental quality standards, but also in a significant increase in fair trade;
16. ocenjuje, da je treba potem, ko bo pridružitveni sporazum začel veljati, spodbuditi tudi tristransko sodelovanje in dvoregionalno sodelovanje, zlasti s karibskimi državami, ter podpreti politiko sodelovanja jug-jug.
Takes the view that once the association agreement has entered into force, three-way and bi-regional cooperation should also be promoted – especially with the Caribbean – and the policy of South-South cooperation encouraged.
Pogajalski mandat za pridružitveni sporazum med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter državami Srednje Amerike na drugi
On the negotiating mandate for an Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States on the one part, and Central America on the other part
Predlog priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o pogajalskem mandatu za sklenitev pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter državami Srednje Amerike na drugi
Proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the negotiating mandate for an association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the countries of Central America, of the other part
Datum razglasitve dovoljenja na zasedanju
Date announced in plenary
Poslanci, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Members present for the final vote final
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 92/49/EGS in direktiv 2002/83/ES, 2004/39/ES, 2005/68/ES in 2006/48/ES glede postopkovnih pravil in ocenjevalnih meril za oceno varnega in skrbnega poslovanja pri pridobitvah in zvišanju imetništva delnic v finančnem sektorju
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of shareholdings in the financial sector
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0507 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0507 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 47(2) in 55 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0298/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 47(2) and 55 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0298/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6‑0027/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0027/2006 ),
(2) Vendar pa pravni okvir ne zagotavlja podrobnih meril za oceno varnega in skrbnega poslovanja v zvezi s predlagano pridobitvijo ali povečanjem deleža niti postopka za njihovo uporabo.
(2) That legal framework does not, however, provide detailed criteria for a prudential assessment of the proposed acquisition or increase in holding nor a procedure for their application.
Posledice tega so manjša pravna varnost, jasnost in predvidljivost ocenjevalnega postopka in njegovih ugotovitev.
This has resulted in a lack of legal certainty, clarity and predictability with regard to the assessment process as well as to the result thereof.
(2) Pravni okvir do sedaj še ni zagotovil niti podrobnih meril za oceno varnega in skrbnega poslovanja v zvezi s predlagano pridobitvijo ali povečanjem deleža niti postopka za njihovo uporabo.
(2) The legal framework has so far provided neither detailed criteria for a prudential assessment of the proposed acquisition or increase in holding nor a procedure for their application.
Za zagotovitev nujne pravne varnosti, jasnosti in predvidljivosti ocenjevalnega postopka in njegovih ugotovitev , je treba pojasniti merila in postopek ocene varnega in skrbnega poslovanja .
A clarification of the criteria and the process of prudential assessment is needed to provide the necessary legal certainty, clarity and predictability with regard to the assessment process as well as to the result thereof.
Obrazložitev postane objektivnejša s preoblikovanjem besedila.
By rewording a more objective justification is laid down.
(3) Naloga pristojnih organov v nacionalnih in čezmejnih primerih bi morala biti, da ocenijo varno in skrbno poslovanje v okviru jasnih ocenjevalnih meril in postopkov .
(3) The role of the competent authorities in both domestic and cross-border cases should be to carry out a prudential assessment within a framework of clear assessment criteria and procedures .
Zato je treba določiti merila za nadzorno oceno delničarjev in upravljanja v zvezi s predlagano pridobitvijo ali povečanjem kvalificiranega deleža ter jasen postopek za njihovo uporabo.
It is therefore necessary to specify criteria for the supervisory assessment of shareholders and management in relation to a proposed acquisition or increase of a qualifying holding and a clear procedure for their application.
Da se zagotovi skladnost, morajo biti ta merila v skladu z merili, ki se uporabljajo za delničarje in upravljanje v postopku pridobitve začetnega dovoljenja.
To ensure coherence those criteria should be consistent with the criteria applied in relation to shareholders and management in the initial authorisation procedure.
(3) Naloga pristojnih organov v nacionalnih in čezmejnih primerih bi morala biti, da ocenijo varno in skrbno poslovanje v okviru jasnih ocenjevalnih meril in jasnega postopka .
(3) The role of the competent authorities in both domestic and cross-border cases should be to carry out a prudential assessment within a framework of clear assessment criteria and a clear procedure .
Prav tako je zelo pomembno zagotoviti skladnost med merili za tovrstno nadzorno oceno in merili, ki se uporabljajo v začetnem postopku pridobitve dovoljenja za delničarje in upravo v državah članicah, kjer se pridobitev izvaja.
It is of equally high importance to ensure consistency between criteria for such supervisory assessment and the criteria applied in the initial authorisation procedure in relation to shareholders and management in the Member State in which the acquisition is sought.
Preprečiti bi bilo treba, da se skuša izogniti pogojem za pridobitev začetnega dovoljenja, tako da se opravi nakup večinskega deleža v ciljnem subjektu.
It should not be possible to circumvent the initial conditions for authorisation by acquiring a majority holding in the target entity.
Ta direktiva ne preprečuje pristojnim organom, da upoštevajo obveznosti, ki jih je predlagani pridobitelj sprejel zaradi izpolnjevanja zahtev skrbnega in varnega poslovanja v okviru meril za nadzorno oceno, če to ne zadeva pravic predlaganega pridobitelja v okviru te direktive.
This Directive should not prevent the competent authorities from taking into account commitments made by the proposed acquirer to meet prudential requirements under the criteria for supervisory assessment, provided that the rights of the proposed acquirer under this Directive are not affected.
(3a) Ocena varnega in skrbnega poslovanja predlagane pridobitve v nobenem primeru ne preklicuje ali nadomešča zahtev tekočega nadzora varnega in skrbnega poslovanja ter ostalih ustreznih določb, ki urejajo pogoje delovanja ciljnega subjekta od pridobitve začetnega dovoljenja.
(3a) The prudential assessment of a proposed acquisition should not in any way suspend or supersede the requirements of on-going prudential supervision and other relevant provisions, to which the target entity has been subject since its own initial authorisation.
Uvodna izjava 3 b (novo)
RECITAL 3 B (new)
(3b) Predlagane določbe udeležencem na trgu ne preprečujejo učinkovitega delovanja na trgu vrednostnih papirjev.
(3b) The proposed provisions should not prevent market participants from effectively operating in the securities market.
Informacije, potrebne za ocenjevanje predlagane pridobitve, in ocena o izpolnjevanju različnih meril bi zato morale biti med drugim sorazmerne z udeležbo predlaganega pridobitelja pri upravljanju institucije, v kateri se skuša pridobiti delež.
The information required for assessing a proposed acquisition, as well as the assessment of the compliance with the different criteria should, therefore, be proportionate, inter alia, to the involvement of the proposed acquirer in the management of the institution in which the acquisition is sought.
Pristojni organi bi prav tako v skladu z dobrim upravnim ravnanjem morali nemudoma zaključiti svojo oceno in v vsakem primeru obvestiti predlaganega pridobitelja o pozitivni oceni, če je predlagani dobavitelj to zahteval.
The competent authorities should also, in accordance with good administrative practice, complete their assessment without delay and inform the proposed acquirer of a positive assessment in any event if requested to do so by the proposed acquirer.
(4) Za trge, ki se vse bolj povezujejo, in kjer strukture skupin lahko segajo v različne države članice, je treba za pridobitev kvalificiranega deleža opraviti pregled v več državah članicah , zato je zelo pomembna skladnost postopka in ocen varnega in skrbnega poslovanja v vsej Skupnosti, pri čemer države članice ne določijo strožjih pravil.
(4) For markets that are increasingly integrated and where group structures may extend to various Member States, the acquisition of a qualifying holding is subject to scrutiny in a number of Member States and harmonisation throughout the Community of the procedure and the prudential assessments, without the Member States laying down stricter rules, is critical.
(4) Za trge, ki se vse bolj povezujejo, in kjer strukture skupin lahko segajo v različne države članice, je treba za pridobitev kvalificiranega deleža opraviti pregled v več državah članicah .
(4) For markets that are increasingly integrated and where group structures may extend to various Member States, the acquisition of a qualifying holding is subject to scrutiny in a number of Member States .
Zato je zelo pomembna čim večja skladnost postopka in ocen varnega in skrbnega poslovanja v vsej Skupnosti, pri čemer države članice ne določijo strožjih pravil.
Maximum harmonisation throughout the Community of the procedure and the prudential assessments, without the Member States laying down stricter rules, is therefore critical.
Pojasniti je treba, da se čim večja skladnost nanaša na postopek in ocene varnega in skrbnega poslovanja.
It needs to be clarified that maximum harmonisation is applied as regards the procedure and the prudential assessments.
(5) Glede na oceno varnega in skrbnega poslovanja obsega merilo o „ugledu predlaganega pridobitelja“ določitev, ali obstaja kakršen koli dvom o neoporečnosti in strokovni usposobljenosti predlaganega pridobitelja in ali so ti dvomi utemeljeni; taki dvomi lahko izvirajo npr. iz preteklega poslovanja.
(5)With regard to the prudential assessment, the criterion concerning the 'reputation of the proposed acquirer' implies the determination of whether any doubts exist about the integrity and professional competence of the proposed acquirer and whether these doubts are founded; such doubts may arise, for instance, from past business conduct.
Ocena ugleda ima poseben pomen, če je predlagani pridobitelj neurejen subjekt.
The assessment of the reputation is of particular relevance if the proposed acquirer is an unregulated entity.
Ocena ugleda ima poseben pomen, če je predlagani pridobitelj neurejen subjekt , vendar jo je treba poenostaviti, če ima pridobitelj dovoljenje EU in je pod njenim nadzorom .
The assessment of the reputation is of particular relevance if the proposed acquirer is an unregulated entity but should be facilitated if the acquirer is authorised and supervised within the EU .
(5a) Seznami držav članic, ki navajajo potrebne informacije za ocenjevanje izključno v skladu z merili te direktive, morajo biti sorazmerni z zapletenostjo ocenjevanega primera, pristojnim organom pa morajo zagotoviti potrebno prilagodljivost, ko od njih zahtevajo dodatne ustrezne informacije, zlasti če je morebitni pridobitelj nereguliran subjekt ali ima sedež v tretji državi.
(5a) Lists established by the Member States, specifying the information that may be requested for the purpose of assessments, strictly according to the criteria set out in this Directive, should be proportionate to the complexity of the case assessed and should provide the competent authorities with the necessary flexibility to request further relevant information, in particular if the potential acquirer is an unregulated entity or established in a third country.
Potrebno bi bilo tudi predvideti možnost, da se v upravičenih primerih zahtevajo manj obsežne informacije.
Provision should also be made for the possibility to request less extensive information in justified cases.
(5b) Ta direktiva določa najdaljše obdobje za zaključek ocenjevanja in tako zagotavlja jasnost in predvidljivost ocenjevalnega postopka.
(5b) In order to ensure the clarity and predictability of the assessment procedure, this Directive lays down a maximum period for the completion of the assessment.
Pristojni organ med ocenjevalnim postopkom lahko postopek ustavi le enkrat in samo, če zahteva dodatne informacije.
During the assessment procedure, the competent authority can stop the clock once only and for the purpose of requesting additional information alone.
V vsakem primeru lahko pristojni organ v razumnem času pred potekom ocenjevalnega obdobja zahteva nadaljnja pojasnila, morebitni pridobitelj pa lahko predloži dodatne informacije.
In any event, in reasonable time before the expiry of assessment period, the competent authority may request further clarification and the potential acquirer may submit additional information.
Izogibanje vprašanjem in odgovorom v zadnjem trenutku spodbuja dobro sodelovanje.
It is in the interest of a good cooperation to avoid last minute questions and answers.
Poleg tega potrebujejo nadzorniki za pripravo primerne ocene dovolj časa.
In addition, supervisors need sufficient time to make a proper assessment.
Zagotoviti je treba, da zahteve za informacije v zadnjem trenutku ali pozne predložitve zahtevanih informacij ne ogrozijo nemotenega postopka ocenjevanja.
It needs to be ensured that a smooth progress of the assessment is not jeopardized by a last minute requests of information or a very late delivery of requested information.
(6) Da lahko Komisija izpolni svojo nalogo v skladu s Pogodbo in da se ji omogoči ocena, ali je treba merila za oceno primernosti dodatno pojasniti, mora dobiti pravico zahtevati kopije dokumentov, na katerih so pristojni organi utemeljili svojo oceno varnega in skrbnega poslovanja.
(6) In order to fulfil its role under the Treaty and to be able to assess whether the criteria for the suitability assessment need further clarification, the Commission should be entitled to request copies of the documents on which the competent authorities have based their prudential assessment.
(6) Komisiji je treba v skladu s pravicami in obveznostmi iz Pogodbe omogočiti spremljanje uporabe določb o varnem in skrbnem poslovanju pri pridobitvah zato, da lahko izpolni naloge, ki so ji bile dodeljene v zvezi z izvrševanjem prava Skupnosti.
(6) The Commission should, in accordance with the rights and obligations set out in the Treaty, be able to monitor the application of the provisions regarding the prudential assessment of acquisitions in order to fulfil the tasks assigned to it with regard to the enforcement of Community law.
Ne glede na člen 296 Pogodbe bi morale države članice sodelovati s Komisijo in ji zagotavljati informacije o ocenah varnega in skrbnega poslovanja, ki jih izvajajo nacionalni pristojni organi , izključno zato, da se ugotovi, ali so države članice kršile svoje obveznosti iz te direktive.
Notwithstanding Article 296 of the Treaty, the Member States should cooperate with the Commission by providing it with information pertaining to prudential assessments carried out by their competent authorities ,for the sole purpose of determining whether Member States have infringed their obligations under this Directive.
Uvodna izjava 8 a (novo)
RECITAL 8 a (new)
(8a) Namen Skupnosti je, da ohrani lastne finančne trge odprte za ostale države in tako prispeva k izboljšanju liberalizacije globalnih finančnih trgov v tretjih državah.
(8a) The Community's intention is to keep its financial markets open to the rest of the world and thus to help improve the liberalisation of the global financial markets in third countries.
Vsi udeleženci na trgu bi imeli korist od enakega dostopa do naložb v svetovnem okviru.
It would be beneficial for all market participants to achieve equivalent access to investment worldwide.
Države članice bi morale Komisiji poročati o primerih, ko kreditne institucije, investicijske družbe, druge finančne institucije ali zavarovalnice Skupnosti, ki pridobivajo kreditne institucije, investicijske družbe, druge finančne institucije ali zavarovalnice v tretjih državah, niso enako obravnavane kot domači pridobitelji in se srečujejo z večjimi ovirami.
Member States should report to the Commission cases in which Community credit institutions, investment firms, other financial institutions or insurance companies acquiring credit institutions, investment firms, other financial institutions or insurance companies situated in a third country are not granted the same treatment as domestic acquirers and encounter major impediments.
Komisija bi morala predlagati ukrepe za reševanje tovrstnih primerov ali za njihovo obravnavo na ustrezni ravni.
The Commission should propose measures to remedy such cases or raise them in an appropriate forum.
Člen 1, točka 1 a (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 A (new)
Člen 1, točka (g), pododstavek 2 a (novo) (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 1, point (g), subparagraph 2 a (new) (Directive 92/49/EEC)
V členu 1 točka (g) se doda naslednji tretji pododstavek:
In Article 1 point (g) the following third subparagraph shall be added:
"Pri ugotavljanju, ali so izpolnjena merila za kvalificiran delež iz tega člena in kakršen koli delež iz členov 15 do 15c, države članice ne upoštevajo glasovalnih pravic ali delnic, ki:
"In determining whether the criteria for a qualifying holding referred to in this Article and any level of holding referred to in Articles 15 to 15c are fulfilled, Member States shall not take into account voting rights or shares which:
(i) so do 20 % glasovalnih pravic ali kapitala zavarovalnice pridobljene ali v lasti v okoliščinah iz člena 9(4) do (6) Direktive 2004/109/ES (v ta namen se ne upošteva sklicevanje na prag 5 % iz člena 9(5) in (6) Direktive 2004/109/ES), ali
(i) up to a limit of 20% of the voting rights or the capital of the insurance undertaking, are acquired or held in the circumstances referred to in Article 9(4) to (6) of Directive 2004/109/EC (and for these purposes the references in Article 9(5) and (6) of Directive 2004/109/EC to the 5% threshold shall be disregarded), or
(ii) so v začasni lasti zaradi odkupa izdaje ali ponudbe vrednostnih papirjev, pod pogojem, da se glasovalne pravice ne uveljavljajo ali drugače uporabljajo za poseganje v upravljanje izdajatelja in če se od glasovalnih pravic ali delnic odstopi v enem letu od nakupa."
(ii) are held on a temporary basis as a result of underwriting the issue or offer of securities, provided that the voting rights are not exercised or otherwise used to intervene in the management of the issuer and so long as the voting rights or shares are disposed of within one year of acquisition."
Člen 1, točka 1 b (novo) Člen 1, točka g, pododstavek 2 b (novo) (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 B (new) Article 1, point g, subparagraph 2 b (new) (Directive 92/49/EEC)
V členu 1 točka (g) se doda naslednji četrti pododstavek:
In Article 1 point (g), the following fourth subparagraph shall be added :
"Poleg tega se zaradi določanja kvalificiranega deleža in drugih deležev iz tega člena in členov 15 do 15c ne zahteva od matičnega podjetja, da združi svoje deleže iz členov 9 in 10 Direktive 2004/109/ES z deleži, ki jih upravlja hčerinsko podjetje v okoliščinah, kjer to podjetje:
"In addition, for the purposes of determining a qualifying holding and the other levels of holding referred to in this Article and in Articles 15 to 15c, a parent undertaking shall not be required to aggregate its holdings under Articles 9 and 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC with the holdings managed by a subsidiary undertaking in the circumstances where its subsidiary:
(i) je družba za upravljanje v okviru člena 1a(2) Direktive 85/611/EGS, ki:
(i) is a management company as defined in Article 1a(2) of Directive 85/611/EEC, which:
- upravlja deleže pod pogoji Direktive 85/611/EGS;
- manages holdings under the conditions laid down in Directive 85/611/EEC;
- je investicijska družba, pooblaščena za upravljanje portfelja v okviru točke 4 oddelka A priloge I k Direktivi 2004/39/ES, ki upravlja deleže za vsako stranko posebej pod pogoji, enakimi tistim iz Direktive 85/611/EGS; ali
- is an investment firm authorised to provide portfolio management as provided for by point 4 of Section A of Annex I to Directive 2004/39/EC, which manages holdings on a client-by-client basis under conditions equivalent to those provided for in Directive 85/611/EEC; or
- je podjetje z registriranim sedežem v tretji državi, ki bi moralo pridobiti dovoljenje v skladu s členom 5(1) Direktive 85/611/EGS ali v zvezi z upravljanjem portfelja v okviru priloge I, oddelek 1, točka 4 Direktive 2004/39/ES, če bi imelo registriran sedež - oziroma samo v primeru investicijske družbe glavni sedež - znotraj Skupnosti, in upravlja deleže za vsako stranko posebej pod pogoji, enakimi tistim iz Direktive 85/611/EGS; in
- is an undertaking whose registered office is in a third country, which would have required an authorisation in accordance with Article 5(1) of Directive 85/611/EEC or with regard to portfolio management as provided in Annex I, Section 1, point 4 of Directive 2004/39/EC if it had its registered office - or, in the case of an investment firm only, its head office - within the Community and which manages holdings on a client-by-client basis under conditions equivalent to those provided for in Directive 85/611/EEC; and
(ii) uveljavlja svoje glasovalne pravice neodvisno od matičnega podjetja.
(ii) exercises its voting rights independently from the parent undertaking.