natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
7. priznava, da se v kmetovanju po vsem svetu in še posebej v državah, ki so pomembne partnerice EU v trgovini s kmetijskimi izdelki, hitro in v vse večji meri sprejema biotehnologijo, še zlasti gensko spremenjene kulturne rastline; ugotavlja, da je leta 2005 okoli devet milijonov kmetov v Braziliji, Indiji, na Kitajskem, v Južni Afriki, Kanadi, Združenih državah in v vse večjem številu razvitih držav in držav v razvoju gensko spremenjene organizme pridelovalo na skoraj 90 milijonih hektarov, kar je enako površini obdelovalne zemlje v Evropski uniji;
7. acknowledges the rapid and growing uptake of biotechnology in general, and GM crops in particular, in farming throughout the world and specifically in countries which are important trading partners of the EU in agricultural products; notes that in 2005, some nine million farmers in Brazil, India, China, South Africa, Canada, the United States and in a growing number of developed and developing countries cultivated almost 90 million hectares of genetically modified products which is the equivalent of the land area cultivated in the EU;
8. je prepričan, da bo na podlagi obstoječe zakonodaje, ki zadeva odobritev biotehnologije in njeno uporabo v kmetijstvu v Evropi in v tretjih državah, v prihodnje potrebna okrepljena izmenjava informacij in sodelovanje, da bi zagotovili nemoteno trgovino brez ogrožanja okolja in javne varnosti;
8. is convinced that, on the basis of existing legislation covering approvals for and uses of biotechnology in agriculture in Europe and third countries, enhanced exchanges of information and cooperation will be required in future to safeguard unhampered trade without prejudice to environmental and public safety;
9. priznava, da je Kartagenski protokol o biološki varnosti h konvenciji Združenih narodov o biološki raznovrstnosti, ki temelji na previdnostnem načelu, pomemben forum za obravnavo posledic čezmejnega gibanja gensko spremenjenih organizmov, ki predstavljajo zgolj eno od oblik uporabe biotehnologije; kljub temu ne verjame, da se lahko previdnostno načelo uporablja za preprečevanje vseh znanstvenih novosti, med drugim tudi na področju genskega inženirstva; in meni, da je treba pravila, ki veljajo za trgovino z gensko spremenjenimi organizmi, določiti v okviru STO; nadalje meni, da bi jih morale države članice STO upoštevati; meni tudi, da je treba najti večje ravnotežje med sistemom STO in večstranskimi okoljskimi sporazumi;
9. acknowledges that the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, which is based on the precautionary principle, constitutes an important forum for addressing the implications of cross-border movement of GMOs; which are only one application of biotechnology; nevertheless, does not believe that the precautionary principle can be used to block all scientific innovation including in the area of genetic engineering; and considers that the rules governing trade in genetically modified organisms must be laid down within the framework of the WTO; moreover, the rules that are laid down there should be complied with by WTO member countries; considers also that a better balance will need to be found between the WTO system and MEAs;
10. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj ohranijo skladnost zakonodaje Skupnosti in nacionalne zakonodaje s pravili STO in obveznostmi do nje;
10. calls on the Commission and the Member States to keep Community and national legislation in line with WTO rules and obligations;
11. poudarja, da igra biotehnologija, še posebej gensko spremenjeni organizmi, vse pomembnejšo vlogo v mednarodnih trgovinskih sporih; kot je razvidno iz prakse Organa za reševanje sporov pri STO, se spore rešuje le v skladu z ustreznimi pravili STO, ki, vsaj kar zadeva trgovino, prevladujejo nad vsemi drugimi instrumenti mednarodnega prava;
11. stresses that biotechnology, and, in particular GMOs, have had a growing importance in international trade disputes; in the light of the practice of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, these disputes are solely judged by their conformity with the relevant WTO rules which, as far as trade is concerned, prevail over any other instrument of international law;
12. je seznanjen s predhodnim odločanjem STO o postopku EU za odobritev gensko spremenjenih organizmov;
12. takes note of the WTO’s preliminary ruling on the EU’s approval process for GMOs;
13. meni, da je pomembno, da Komisija in države članice ustrezno upoštevajo končni sklep in ugotovitve STO;
13. considers it important that the Commission and the Member States address the final WTO ruling and its findings in an appropriate manner;
14. meni, da v luči vmesnega poročila odbora STO in nedavnega poročila Komisije o izvajanju nacionalnih ukrepov glede soobstoja gensko spremenjenih kulturnih rastlin in konvencionalnega ter ekološkega kmetijstva popolna prepoved gensko spremenjenih organizmov ni rešitev; meni, da lahko skupni dogovor o postopkih odobritve in/ali sistemih vzajemnega priznavanja pospeši mednarodno izmenjavo izdelkov iz biotehnologije, vendar pod pogojem, da bodo ti sistemi zagotavljali potrebno raven zaščite okolja in potrošnikov in ne bodo vplivali na posebne zahteve, ki v zakonodaji Skupnosti veljajo za označevanje in sledljivost proizvodov;
14. considers that in view of the interim report of the WTO Panel and the Commission’s recent report on the implementation of national measures on the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming, a total ban on GMO crops is not a viable option; considers that commonly agreed approval processes and/or mutual recognition systems may facilitate the international exchange of goods derived from biotechnology, provided such systems safeguard the necessary high level of environmental and consumer protection and do not prejudice specific requirements as to labelling or traceability as provided for by Community legislation;
15. meni, da bi je treba v Evropski uniji poskrbeti za soobstoj konvencionalnega kmetijstva, ekološkega kmetovanja in kmetijstva, v katerem se uporabljajo gensko spremenjeni organizmi; meni, da so potrebna jasna in pregledna pravila o soobstoju, ki bodo zasnovana na trdih znanstvenih dokazih; poudarja, da ta pravila ne smejo privesti do dejanskega moratorija, kar zadeva gensko spremenjene kulturne rastline, saj se je treba izogniti novim postopkom STO za reševanje sporov s Skupnostjo;
15. believes that in the EU coexistence must be organised between conventional agriculture, organic farming and agriculture using genetically modified organisms; considers that clear and transparent coexistence rules, based on solid scientific evidence, are needed; stresses that, in order to avoid further WTO dispute settlement procedures against the Community, coexistence rules must not result in a de facto moratorium in relation to GMO crops;
16. poudarja potrebo po oblikovanju skupnih pravil označevanja in zagotavljanju boljših informacij za potrošnika v skladu s pravili STO;
16. stresses that there is a need for common labelling rules and better consumer information in conformity with WTO rules;
17. meni, da biotehnologija s spodbujanjem uporabe kmetijskih proizvodov za namen, ki ne služi prehranjevanju ljudi (kot so surovine v farmacevtski industriji in drugih industrijah), odpira dodaten trg za kmete in evropskemu kmetijskemu sektorju pomaga, da izpolnjuje obveznosti, ki mu jih nalaga STO;
17. considers that by promoting the use of agricultural products for non-food purposes (such as raw materials in pharmaceutical and other industries), biotechnology offers additional outlets for farmers, and helps the European agricultural sector to comply with WTO obligations;
18. obžaluje dejstvo, da je Evropa zaostala na področju razvoja gensko spremenjenih kulturnih rastlin; zato poziva k namenjanju večje pozornosti podpori ustreznih raziskav in demokratičnemu nadzoru genskih virov; poziva države članice, naj čim prej prenesejo v svojo zakonodajo vse evropske direktive s tega področja;
18. regrets the fact that Europe has fallen behind in the development of GM crops; calls therefore for higher priority to be given to support for adequate research and democratic control of genetic resources; and asks Member States to transpose rapidly all the European directives in this area;
19. meni, da je uporaba gensko spremenjenih semen marsikje po svetu omogočila zmanjšanje uporabe pesticidov in herbicidov, kar je v korist varstvu okolja in biološki raznovrstnosti; zato spodbuja Komisijo, da prevzame dejavno vlogo v mednarodnih razpravah o praktični uporabi biotehnologije v kmetijstvu in pri proizvodnji hrane, tudi v ukrepih proti biopiratstvu v državah v razvoju, in po potrebi daje zanje pobudo;
19. believes that the use of genetically engineered seeds has made it possible in many parts of the world to reduce the use of pesticides and herbicides, which is in the interests of protecting the environment and biodiversity; therefore, encourages the Commission to play an active role in, and where required initiate, international discussions for dealing with the practical use of biotechnology in farming and food production, including actions against biopiracy in the developing countries;
20. pozdravlja zavezanost EU ambiciozni evropski raziskovalni politiki na področju rastlinskih semen in na splošno na področju biotehnologije, rezultat katere ne bo imel le ključne vloge pri zmanjševanju onesnaženja iz kmetijstva ampak tudi pri zadovoljevanju naraščajoče potrebe po hrani v svetu; in meni, da je ta zavezanost predpogoj za uresničitev njenega cilja, da na tem posebnem področju uporabe postane vodilno biogospodarstvo na svetu;
20. welcomes the EU’s commitment to an ambitious European research policy in the area of plant seeds and, more generally, agricultural biotechnology, the outcome of which will play a fundamental part not only in cutting agricultural pollution but also in meeting the world's constantly growing food requirements; and considers this commitment to be a precondition for achieving its goal to become the world’s leading bio-economy in this particular area of application;
21. meni, da je treba vpliv biotehnologije na ekonomijo proizvodnje in trgovine kmetijskih proizvodov presojati širše, vključno z možnimi vplivi na nebiotehnološko proizvodnjo kmetijskih izdelkov ter mogočim vplivom biotehnologije na ekonomijo sedanje in prihodnje neprehranske proizvodnje, kot so biomasa in biogoriva, biološko razgradljiva embalaža, zdravila itd. podpira ambiciozno evropsko raziskovalno politiko na področju biogoriv in na splošno na področju uporabe biomase, ki je ključnega pomena v sedanjih energetskih razmerah in EU omogoča povečati izvoz ter omejiti uvoz, da se izboljša njena trgovinska bilanca;
21. is of the opinion that the impact of biotechnology on the economics of production of and trade in agricultural products must be assessed in a broad manner, including the possible effects on non-biotech agri-food production, the possible impact of biotechnology on the economics of current and future non-food production such as biomass and biofuels, bio-degradable packaging, medicinal products, etc.; supports an ambitious European research policy in the area of biofuels and, more generally, biomass use, which is of key importance in the present energy context, allowing the EU to boost its exports and limit its imports in order to improve the EU's trade balance;
22. se zaveda obstoječega in mogočega vpliva biotehnologije na konkurenčnost gojenja rastlin, kmetovanja in proizvodnje hrane, zlasti zaradi zelo različnih ravni sprejemanja tehnologije v Evropi v primerjavi z glavnimi konkurenti na mednarodnih kmetijskih trgih, in poziva Komisijo, da v naslednjih študijah s tega področja omenjenemu vplivu posveti posebno pozornost, Evropski parlament o tem natančno obvešča in, kjer je potrebno, vloži posebne zakonodajne predloge;
22. is aware of the existing as well as the potential impact of biotechnology on the competitiveness of plant breeding, farming and food production, in particular in view of the very different rates of uptake of the technology in Europe, in comparison with its main competitors on the international agricultural markets, and calls on the Commission to pay specific attention to this impact in its forthcoming related studies, to inform the European Parliament extensively about it and to put forward specific legislative proposals if and where required;
23. je prepričan, da je selekcija s pomočjo označevalcev (MAS), na podlagi katere je mogoče kulturne rastline izboljšati s "pametnim gojenjem", na primer s križanjem rastlin iz sorodnih družin namesto z njihovim genskim spreminjanjem z vstavljanjem tujih genov, zagotovo velik prispevek k razvoju energetsko učinkovite, hkrati pa za okolje varne biomase;
23. is convinced that Marked Assisted Selection (MAS), which allows the improvement of crops through "smart breeding", i.e. the crossing of plants of similar families rather than their genetic modification through the integration of foreign genes, must provide a major contribution to the development of energy-intensive and at the same time environmentally safe biomass;
24. poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o ocenjevalnem sistemu, ki bo na znanstveni podlagi predvidel, katere prednosti in tveganja prinaša uporaba biotehnologij zdravju ljudi in živali ter kako vpliva na okolje;
24. asks the Commission to contemplate an evaluation system which would ascertain on scientific bases the advantages and risks associated with the use of biotechnologies both for human and animal health and the impact of their use on the environment;
25. podpira pravico potrošnikov do obveščenosti in izbire med konvencionalnimi ter transgenimi proizvodi;
25. backs the right of consumers to be informed and to choose between conventional products and transgenic products;
26. poudarja pomen biotehnologije za prihodnost trajnostnega kmetijstva, na primer pri razvoju bioenergije, nadomestnih proizvodov za proizvode iz nafte, kot je plastika, in novih trajnostnih načinov gojenja kulturnih rastlin; zato poudarja, da je treba biotehnološkemu sektorju dodeliti več finančnih sredstev iz skupne kmetijske politike, vključno s sredstvi za izobraževanje kmetov o možnostih biotehnologije v okviru trajnostnega kmetijstva.
26. emphasises the importance of biotechnology for the future of sustainable agriculture, for example in developing bioenergy, substitutes for oil products such as plastics and new sustainable methods for growing crops; stresses therefore that more agricultural funds must be allocated out of the CAP to the biotechnology sector, including funds for the education of farmers about the possibilities of biotechnology within the framework of sustainable agriculture.
Enrique Barón Crespo 12.9.2006
Enrique Barón Crespo 12.09.2006
Pripravljavka mnenja: María del
Draftswoman: María del
1. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je v sedmi okvirni program za raziskave vključena uporaba kmetijske biotehnologije za neprehranske namene;
Welcomes the fact that the Seventh Framework Programme for Research includes the application of agricultural biotechnology for non-food purposes;
4. podpira raziskovalne projekte, ki si prizadevajo izboljšati ekonomsko upravičenost kmetijstva in neživilskih kmetijskih proizvodov (vključno z biogorivi), trajnostno proizvodnjo živil in preprečevanje bolezni;
Gives its backing to research projects designed to improve the economic viability of agriculture and non-food agricultural products (including biofuels), the sustainable production of foodstuffs and disease prevention;
6. poziva države članice, naj prepovejo tehnologije, ki ogrožajo zdravje in okolje, vključno z uporabo genov, odpornih na antibiotike za uporabo v humani medicini, ki jih je mogoče razširjati v okolju;
Urges the Member States to ban technologies that involve a threat to health and the environment, including the use of genes resistant to antibiotics for human use that may be propagated in the environment;
Biotehnologija: obeti in izzivi za kmetijstvo v Evropi
Biotechnology: Prospects and challenges for Agriculture in Europe
MNENJE Odbor za razvoj ..............................................................................................17
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT......................................................18
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................21
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS..............22
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................26
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY...............27
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 29
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 30
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Načrt za enakost med ženskami in moškimi 2006–2010“ ( KOM(2006)0092 )
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘A Roadmap for equality between women and men’ – 2006-2010 ( COM(2006)0092 )
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta 2001/51/ES z dne 20. decembra 2000 o določitvi programa v zvezi z okvirno strategijo Skupnosti za enakost spolov (2001–2005)
– having regard to Council Decision 2001/51/EC of 20 December 2000 establishing a Programme relating to the Community framework strategy on gender equality (2001‑2005)
C 223, 8.8.2001, str.
OJ C 223, 8.8.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju pravnih instrumentov Združenih narodov na področju človekovih pravic in zlasti pravic žensk, predvsem konvencije o odpravi vseh oblik diskriminacije žensk, ter drugih instrumentov Združenih narodov na področju nasilja nad ženskami, kot so Dunajska deklaracija in akcijski program, ki ju je sprejela svetovna konferenca o človekovih pravicah, ter resolucij generalne skupščine Združenih narodov – resolucija 48/104 z dne 20. decembra 1993 o odpravi nasilja nad ženskami, resolucija 58/147 z dne 19. februarja 2004 o odpravi hišnega nasilja nad ženskami, resolucija 57/179 z dne 30. januarja 2003 o odpravi umora v imenu časti in resolucija 52/86 z dne 2. februarja 1998 o ukrepih za preprečevanje kaznivih dejanj in kazenskem sodstvu za odpravo nasilja nad ženskami,
– having regard to the United Nations legal instruments in the sphere of human rights and especially women’s rights, in particular the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and other United Nations instruments relating to violence against women, for example the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights, and UN General Assembly resolutions 48/104, of 20 December 1993, on the elimination of violence against women, 58/147, of 19 February 2004, on the elimination of domestic violence against women, 57/179, of 30 January 2003, working towards the elimination of crimes against women committed in the name of honour, and 52/86, of 2 February 1998, on crime prevention and criminal justice measures to eliminate violence against women,
– ob upoštevanju izhodišč za ukrepanje, sprejetih na četrti svetovni konferenci o ženskah, ki je potekala 15. septembra 1995 v Pekingu, ter svoje resolucije z dne 18. maja 2000 o ukrepih po pekinških izhodiščih za ukrepanje
– having regard to the Action Programme adopted at the Fourth World Conference on Women, held in Beijing on 15 September 1995, and to Parliament’s resolutions of 18 May 2000 on the follow-up to the Beijing Action Programme
– ob upoštevanju poročila generalnega sekretarja Združenih narodov z dne 9. oktobra 2006 „Poglobljena študija o vseh oblikah nasilja nad ženskami“,
– having regard to the report of the Secretary-General of the United Nations of 9 October 2006 entitled ‘In-depth study on all forms of violence against women’,
– ob upoštevanju končnega poročila 49. seje komisije za status žensk pri generalni skupščini Združenih narodov, objavljenega v marcu 2005,
– having regard to the final report adopted in March 2005 at the 49th session of the UN General Assembly Commission on the Status of Women,
– ob upoštevanju protokola o pravicah žensk v Afriki, znanega tudi pod imenom „maputski protokol“, ki je začel veljati 26. oktobra 2005 in med drugim prepoveduje vse oblike pohabljanja spolnih organov,
– having regard to the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa, also known as the ‘Maputo Protocol’, which came into force on 26 October 2005 and which among other things prohibits all forms of genital mutilation,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije 1325 varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov z dne 31. oktobra 2000 o ženskah, miru in varnosti, ki predvideva večjo udeležbo žensk pri preprečevanju oboroženih sporov in graditvi miru,
– having regard to UN Security Council Resolution 1325 of 31 October 2000 on women, peace and security, which calls for greater involvement of women in the prevention of armed conflicts and in peace-building,
– ob upoštevanju poročila posvetovalnega odbora Komisije za enakost med spoloma iz maja 2003 o upoštevanju načela enakosti med spoloma pri pripravi nacionalnih proračunov,
– having regard to the report delivered in May 2003 by the Commission’s Advisory Committee on Equal Opportunities for Men and Women, on gender budgeting,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Lizboni 23. in 24. marca 2000, v Stockholmu 23. in 24. marca 2001, v Barceloni 15. in 16. marca 2002, v Bruslju 20. in 21. marca 2003 ter v Bruslju 25. in 26. marca 2004,
– having regard to the presidency conclusions issued following the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000, the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001, the Barcelona European Council of 15 and 16 March 2002, and the Brussels European Councils of 20 and 21 March 2003 and 25 and 26 March 2004,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta 2005/600/ES z dne 12. julija 2005 o smernicah za politiko zaposlovanja v državah članicah
– having regard to Council Decision 2005/600/EC of 12 July 2005 on Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. januarja 2006 o prihodnosti lizbonske strategije z vidika enakosti spolov
– having regard to its resolution of 19 January 2006 on the future of the Lisbon Strategy from the point of view of the gender perspective,
UL C 287 E, 24.11.2006, str.
OJ C 287 E, 24.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. marca 2004 o uskladitvi poklicnega, družinskega in zasebnega življenja
– having regard to its resolution of 9 March 2004 on reconciling professional, family and private lives,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. februarja 2004 o določenih vidikih organizacije delovnega časa (revizija Direktive 93/104/ES)
– having regard to its resolution of 11 February 2004 on the organisation of working time (revision of Directive 93/104/EC),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 2. februarja 2006 o trenutnih razmerah v boju proti nasilju nad ženskami in možnih prihodnjih ukrepih
– having regard to its resolution of 2 February 2006 on the current situation in combating violence against women and any future actions,
UL C 288 E, 25.11.2006, str.
OJ C 288 E, 25.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. januarja 2006 o strategijah za boj proti zlorabi žensk in otrok, izpostavljenih spolnemu izkoriščanju
– having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2006 on strategies to prevent trafficking of women and children who are vulnerable to sexual exploitation,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o priseljevanju žensk: vloga in mesto priseljenk v Evropski uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 24 October 2006 on women’s immigration: the role and place of immigrant women in the European Union,
Sprejeta besedila s tem datumom, P6_TA(2006)0437 . ,
Texts adopted of that date, P6­_TA(2006)0437.
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave, ki so jo ministri EU, pristojni za politiko enakosti med spoloma, sprejeli 4. februarja 2005,
– having regard to the common declaration adopted on 4 February 2005 by the EU ministers responsible for gender equality policies,
– ob upoštevanju evropskega pakta za enakost med spoloma, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel marca 2006,
– having regard to the European Pact for Gender Equality adopted by the European Council in March 2006,
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta Commonwealtha za enakost med spoloma 2005–2015,
– having regard to the Commonwealth Plan of Action for Gender Equality 2005-2015,