natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
34. meni, da je zaposlitev odločilen dejavnik za doseganje socialne vključenosti; zato poziva k reformam, ki usmerjajo javno porabo v višanje stopnje zaposlenosti in vrnitve na delo in zagotavljanje spodbud za delo, in sicer s pomočjo odpravljanja pasti revščine in drugih oblik družbene izključenosti ter se nujno lotijo vprašanj visokega števila brezposelnih žensk in pripadnikov nekaterih narodnostnih manjšin, od katerih se številni soočajo z družbenimi in/ali strukturnimi preprekami pri vstopu na trg delovne sile; preučevanje in obravnavanje posebnih težav, s katerimi se soočajo ženske, ki pripadajo narodnostnim manjšinam in ženske priseljenke;
34. considers that employment is a decisive factor in achieving social inclusion; therefore, calls for reforms that direct public spending towards raising employment rates and return to work rates and provide incentives to work by eliminating poverty traps and other forms of social exclusion, and address as a matter of urgency the numbers of women and some ethnic minorities who are unemployed, many of whom face societal and/or structural barriers to entering the labour market; study and address the specific problems faced by women from ethnic minorities and immigrant women;
35. priznava, da je za doseganje prilagodljivosti pri t.i. prilagodljivi varnosti bistvenega pomena oblikovanje in ohranjanje ustreznih mehanizmov socialne zaščite kakor tudi trdna zaščita proti neupravičenem odpuščanju;
35. recognises that, in the 'flexicurity' approach, creating and maintaining adequate social protection mechanisms is an indispensable prerequisite of flexibility, as is firm protection against unfair dismissal;
Širša dimenzija
External dimension
36. ponovno zatrjuje, da bo EU lahko uspešno ščitila svoje interese na mednarodni ravni, samo če bo zmogla ohraniti ekonomsko in socialno kohezijo;
36. reaffirms that only if the EU can preserve its economic and social cohesion will it be able successfully to defend EU interests at an international level;
37. priznava, da globalizacija kljub pozitivnim učinkom ustvarja gospodarska in družbena neravnotežja in tako vzbuja globoko zaskrbljenost evropskih državljanov, zlasti v državah članicah, ki imajo visoko stopnjo brezposelnosti in v regijah, ki so jih najbolj prizadele selitve proizvodnje podjetij; zato poziva države članice, naj začnejo izvajati potrebne strukturne reforme, če naj EU ostane privlačna možnost na svetovnem prizorišču, z izdelki in storitvami visoke kakovosti;
37. recognises that, despite its positive effects, globalisation is producing economic and social imbalances, thus arousing deep apprehension in the citizens of Europe, especially in those Member States with high unemployment rates and those regions most affected by company relocations; calls on the Member States, accordingly, to undertake the structural reforms that are needed if the EU is to remain an attractive option on the world stage, with high-value products and services;
38. poudarja, da mora EU v vseh trgovinskih in razvojnih pogajanjih in sporazumih trdno podpirati socialne vrednote solidarnosti in socialne pravičnosti;
38. stresses that the EU should confidently promote its social values of solidarity and social justice in all trade and development negotiations and agreements;
39. poziva EU in države članice, naj v odnosu do tretjih držav z visoko gospodarsko rastjo (Brazilija, Rusija, Indija in Kitajska) sprejmejo politične ukrepe, da bi dosegli razvojni model, ki zagotavlja spoštovanje človekovih pravic, demokracijo, svobodo, delovne in okoljske standarde in socialno pravičnost; poziva EU, naj pomaga pri iskanju globalnega ravnotežja med gospodarsko rastjo in visokimi socialnimi in okoljskimi standardi;
39. calls on the EU and the Member States to adopt political actions in relation to third countries with a high economic growth (Brazil, Russia, India and China) in order to attain a development model which provides for the respect of human rights, democracy, freedom, labour and environmental standards and social justice; calls on the EU to help in finding a global equilibrium between economic growth and high social and environmental standards;
40. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sprejmejo enotne smernice v forumih kot so Mednarodna organizacija dela, Organizacija za ekonomsko sodelovanje in razvoj ter večstranske okoljske organizacije; meni, da bi moralo biti zlasti delovanje Mednarodne organizacije dela bolj vključeno v sporazume STO in meni, da bi njene ocene poglavitnih delovnih standardov morale biti vključene v strategije EU do STO in dvostranskih pogajanj; poziva Komisijo, naj v dvostranskih sporazumih zagotovi spoštovanje standardov ILO kot minimalnih standardov, da se zagotovijo humani pogoji dela;
40. calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt a consistent line in fora such as the ILO, the OECD, and multilateral environmental agencies; believes, in particular, that the work of the ILO should be more closely integrated into WTO agreements and considers that ILO assessments of core labour standards should be integrated into EU strategies towards WTO and bilateral negotiations; calls on the Commission to ensure, through bilateral agreements, that the ILO standards are, as a minimum, respected so that humane working conditions are guaranteed;
41. pozdravlja uvedbo sheme GSP+, ki spodbuja višje socialne in okoljske standarde, in poziva k razširitvi tega pristopa na dvostranske trgovinske sporazume; ugotavlja, da mora Komisija natančno spremljati izvajanje sheme, da bi zagotovila skladnost s temi standardi;
41. welcomes the introduction of the GSP+ scheme, which provides incentives for higher social and environmental standards, and calls for this approach to be extended to bilateral trade agreements; notes the need for the Commission to monitor closely the implementation of the scheme with a view to ensuring that compliance with these standards is being achieved;
42. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
42. instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
Kako tudi vnaprej državljanom EU zagotavljati boljši življenjski standard in istočasno ostati konkurenčni v svetovnem merilu?
How to continue to improve the standard of living for EU citizens while remaining competitive in the global economy?
V kakšnem razmerju naj bodo gospodarska in socialna politika ter politika zaposlovanja, da bo zagotovljena trajna rast in socialna kohezija?
How to integrate economic, employment and social policy in a way, which delivers sustainable development and social cohesion?
Kako zagotoviti, da bomo vsi uživali koristi rasti?
How to ensure that all share the benefits of growth?
Evropski socialni model
European Social Model
Evropski socialni model je v prvi vrsti vprašanje vrednot.
The European social model is first and foremost a question of values.
Prav v tej točki se naš evropski model razlikuje od, denimo modela ZDA.
It is in this respect that our European model differs from the US model for instance.
Različna področja socialne politike (npr. socialno varstvo, zdravstvo, izobraževanje, varstvene storitve in oskrba) so v EU zelo razvita, kar dokazuje, da socialni koheziji pripisujemo velik pomen.
Social policies (including social protection, health, education and care services) are highly developed in the EU, reflecting a strong attachment to social cohesion.
Teoretiki razlikujejo med štirimi modeli (nordijski, anglosaksonski, celinski in sredozemski), ki se medsebojno razlikujejo glede ravni zaščite ali možnosti za posamezne pobude, a jih vseeno odlikujejo skupne značilnosti.
Academics distinguish 4 different models (Nordic, Anglo-Saxon, continental, Mediterranean) with differences (in level of protection, space for individual initiatives) but also having common features.
Vsem 25 državam članicam so skupne iste vrednote in isti cilj: uskladiti gospodarsko učinkovitost, konkurenčnost in socialno pravičnost.
All 25 Member States share the same values and the same objective of combining economic performance, competitiveness with social justice.
Razlikujejo se le načini, s katerimi skušajo cilje doseči.
They have different instruments to reach the same goals.
Takšni nacionalni modeli so se razvili skozi dolg in kompleksen zgodovinski proces.
These national models are the result of long and complex historical processes.
Soporočevalca menita, da je prav, da priznamo tako skupne vrednote kot razlike v sistemih držav članic.
Your co-rapporteurs take the view that it is important to recognise both the unity of values, and the diversity of the Member States' systems.
Uspeh evropskega socialnega modela
Success of the European social model
Evropska unija je "proces v teku".
The EU is "work in progress".
Vodilo nastanka združene Evrope je bilo doseči, da se evropske države ne bi nikoli več vojskovale med seboj, kar pomeni, da je bila osnovna skrb dobrobit narodov Evrope in širšega sveta.
While the impulse for the creation of a United Europe was to end the possibility of European states ever again going to war against each other, the underlying concern was obviously the welfare of the peoples of Europe and of the wider world.
Ne glede na neuspehe in potrebne reforme je prav, da poudarimo, da je evropski socialni model uspešen.
It is important to underline, in spite of the failures and the need to reform, the success of the European social model.
V širšem svetovnem merilu uživa ugled, češ da prinaša visoko kakovost življenja.
It is known around the world for providing a high quality of life.
Druge države oziroma regije (Bližnji in Srednji vzhod) in organizacije (Mercosul, Asean) ga prikazujejo kot uspešnega.
The EU model is seen by other countries, regions (Middle-East) and organizations (Mercosul, Asean) as an example of success.
Čeprav je v tej naši Uniji brez dela več kot 80 milijonov delovno sposobnih ljudi, na samem robu revščine pa še vedno živi preko 70 milijonov moških, žensk in otrok, je članstvo v EU vendarle zelo pripomoglo k splošni blaginji in politični, socialni in gospodarski stabilnosti držav članic.
Even though in excess of 80m people of working age are jobless and over 70m men, women and children are still at risk of poverty in our Union, the general prosperity and political, social and economic stability of Member States has been greatly enhanced by membership of the EU.
Danes je bolj kot kdaj koli prej splošno sprejeto dejstvo, da temeljno načelo oblikovanja in nadgradnje EU potrebuje nove opredelitve, če naj Unija odraža trenutno politično, gospodarsko in socialno stvarnost.
It is more clearly recognised than ever that the rationale for the creation and development of the EU is in need of restatement in terms that reflect today's political, economic and social realities.
To še toliko bolj velja zato, ker se delo in z njim povezani socialni odnosi zaradi tehnološke revolucije spreminjajo in je postopno staranje evropskega prebivalstva nekaj, s čimer se mora Evropa še posebej soočiti, če želi tudi v prihodnje igrati odmevno vlogo na svetovnem prizorišču.
This is particularly so in circumstances where the technological revolution is restructuring work and the social relationships that it gives rise to, and where the gradual ageing of Europe's population is a challenge to maintaining a vibrant European presence on the world stage.
Na področju demografskega razvoja se Evropa sooča s povsem novimi težavami.
As regards demographic evolutions, Europe is faced now with unprecedented problems.
Med 2005 in 2030 se bo število oseb nad 65 let povečalo za 52,3 % (ali za 40 milijonov), medtem ko bo skupina oseb, starih med 15 in 64 let, upadla za 6,8 % (ali za 21 milijonov).
Between 2005 and 2030, the number of persons above 65 years of age will rise to 52,3% of the population (+40 million), whereas the group of persons between 15 and 64 years will decrease by 6,8% (- 21 million).
Razmerje med neaktivnim prebivalstvom (mladi, starejši in druge odvisne osebe) in delovno aktivnimi bo prešlo z 49 % leta 2005 na 66 % leta 2030.
The ratio between inactive persons (young, old and other dependent persons) and persons in the working age will rise from 49% in 2005 to 66% in 2030.
Tovrstni razvoj je posledica dveh dejavnikov.
This development is the result of two factors.
Prvi je daljšanje pričakovane življenjske dobe.
The first one is the rise in life expectancy.
Od leta 1960 se je pričakovana življenjska doba po 60 letu podaljšala za 5 let za ženske in skoraj za 4 leta za moške.
Since 1960, average life expectancy at 60 has risen five years for women and nearly four years for men.
To pomeni, da bo število oseb, starejših od 80 let, do leta 2050 naraslo za 180 %.
As a result, the number of persons over the age of 80 will increase by 180% by 2050.
Drugi dejavnik je upadanje števila rojstev.
The second factor is the decreasing birth rate.
Stopnja rodnosti je v Evropi zadnjih nekaj deset let močno upadla.
Fertility rates in Europe have declined considerably in recent decades.
Če želimo število prebivalstva ohraniti na sedanji ravni, potem mora minimalna rodnost znašati 2,1 otroka na žensko, leta 2003 pa je bilo povprečje v Uniji 1,48 otroka.
Whereas the minimum birthrate necessary to maintain the population at its present level is 2,1 children per woman, in 2003 women in the EU had on average 1,48 children.
Tovrstni razvoj pomembno vpliva na blaginjo in odnose med generacijami.
These developments have major consequences for prosperity and for the relations between the generations.
Pred evropskim sistemom so še drugi izzivi, npr. globalizacija v vsej svoji raznolikosti in tehnološka revolucija, zaradi katere je za podjetja lažje in finančno bolj zanimivo, če proizvodnjo preselijo v države, kjer je delovna sila poceni in kjer je zaščita delavcev, potrošnikov in okolja na nižji ravni.
Further challenges to the European system are various facets of globalisation and the technological revolution, which make it easier and financially attractive for companies to relocate to low wage countries, which may be less developed with regard to labour, consumer and environmental protections.
Zaradi globalizacije so nekatere države članice zabeležile spodbudno gospodarsko rast, kar pozitivno prispeva k zmanjševanju revščine na globalni ravni.
Due to globalization, some Member States have been shown interesting economic growth ratio, which contributes positively to reduce poverty at global level.
Zato pa se druge države članice soočajo s težavami pri prilagajanju na novo realnost, kar je poglobilo občutek zmedenosti med ljudmi, zlasti v tistih državah članicah, kjer je stopnja brezposelnosti zelo visoka, in tudi v državah, kjer se je izkazalo, da je bila integracija priseljenih delavcev in njihovih družin neuspešna.
However, some others Member States have been experiencing difficulties in adapting themselves to this new reality, which has deepened the citizens' sense of disorientation, particularly in those Member States whose jobless levels are very high, and also in those states where integration of migrant workers and their families has also failed.
Zaradi naštetih in še številnih drugih razlogov se je evropski socialni model znašel v jedru razprav po vsej Evropi.
For these and many other reasons the reform of the European social model is, today, at the heart of the debate in Europe.
Demografske spremembe (staranje prebivalstva, upadanje števila rojstev, daljše trajanje življenja), tehnološki razvoj, globalizacija, pojav novih industrijskih gospodarstev in s tem povezani pritiski na javne izdatke so razlogi, zaradi katerih je absolutno nujna reforma socialnih sistemov, ki morajo imeti produktivno vlogo v naši ekonomiji.
Demographic changes (ageing, declining birth rates, longer life expectancy), technological developments, globalization, the emergence of new industrial economies and the resulting pressures on public expenditure necessitate an urgent reform of the social systems to ensure they play a productive role in our economy.
Reforma mora biti zelo obsežna: seči mora na področje zakonodaje, proračuna, javne uprave in industrijskih odnosov.
The scope for this much-needed reform is a broad one: it has an impact on legislation, on budgets, on public administration and on industrial relations.
V nasprotju s tem, kar menijo nekateri, socialni model Evropske unije ni njen glavni problem.
Contrary to the view of some the EU Social Model is not the main EU problem.
Večji problem je vprašanje, kako odpraviti precejšnjo nenaklonjenost do vprašanja gospodarskih reform.
The problem is more a question of the high level of reluctance demonstrated in making economic reforms.
Dokler bo EU beležila približno eno ali dvoodstotno rast, ni prav veliko manevrskega prostora, čeprav je manjšanje socialnih ugodnosti skoraj neizogibno.
As long as the EU is growing around 1% or 2%, there is not much can be done, with the loss of social benefits being almost unavoidable.
Unija lahko pri potrebni reformi sodeluje z nadaljnjo integracijo notranjega trga, ki državljanom EU ponuja izjemne možnosti in hkrati pozitivno vpliva na rast in blaginjo.
The EU can contribute to the necessary reform through a further integration of the internal market, which creates tremendous opportunities for EU citizens and for growth and prosperity.
Notranji trg potrebuje novih spodbud: bistveno večje naložbe in dovolj obsežno finančno perspektivo do leta 2013, ki bo omogočila ozemeljsko in socialno kohezijo vseh petindvajsetih držav članic; ter z dodatno liberalizacijo trgov in prostega gibanja oseb, vendar brez škodljive tekmovalnosti; in z dopolnjevanjem vseevropskih omrežij.
The internal market needs to be reinvigorated by increasing substantially investment and the Financial Perspectives up to 2013 which is sufficient to ensure territorial and social cohesion in all twenty five Member States; by further liberalising markets and the free movement of people in a way which does not contribute to a ‘race to the bottom’; and by completing the Trans-European networks.
Namen lizbonske strategije je bil odzvati se na potrebo po celovitih in skupnih socialnih in tržnih reformah, ki bi vodile v Evropo odličnosti, v Evropo, ki bi se znala spopasti z vsemi izzivi.
The Lisbon Strategy sought to address the need for comprehensive and integrated social and market reforms in order to create a Europe of Excellence, which would be up to these challenges.
Kasneje, decembra 2001, je bilo z laekensko izjavo jasno izraženo, da Evropa znotraj novega svetovnega reda nujno potrebuje "novega zaleta".
Later, in December 2001, the Laeken Declaration also clearly recognised the imperative for a "relaunch" of Europe in the context of the new global order.
V obeh dokumentih je socialna dimenzija Evrope predstavljena kot temelj, na katerem sloni podpora državljanov projektu Evropske unije.
In both decisions the social dimension of Europe is seen as fundamental to citizens' support for the European Union project.
Ustavo je trenutno ratificiralo 15 držav članic, v dveh primerih pa je bila z referendumom zavrnjena.
While at this time the Constitution has been ratified in 15 Member States, it has been rejected by referendum in two.
Izrečenih je bilo že mnogo besed o tem, zakaj sta jo Francija in Nizozemska zavrnili, čeprav je povsem očitno, da preambula v prvem delu, z navedenimi ambicijami, vrednotami in cilji Evropske unije, in listina o temeljnih pravicah v drugem delu, v veliki meri odražata globoko zarezan občutek državljanov, po katerem se opredeljujejo kot Evropejci.
There has been much debate about the reasons for its rejection in France and Holland, but what is clear is that the Preamble, setting out the ambitions for the Union, the values and objectives in Part I, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights in Part II, largely reflect citizens' deeply held sense of self-definition as Europeans.
Soporočevalca poudarjata, da reforma ne sme voditi v opuščanje vsega, kar je v evropskem modelu pozitivno, pač pa v ohranjanje temeljnih pravic, kar lahko dosežemo tako, da modelu zagotovimo ustrezno vzdržnost.
Your co-rapporteurs emphasis that this reform should not be about giving up the achievements of the European model but rather about retaining the fundamental values by securing the sustainability of the European model.
Slednja je odvisna od tega, kako uspešna bo strategija rasti in zaposlovanja ter od reform samih.
The sustainability of the model depends both on the success of the strategy for growth and jobs, and on reforms to the model itself.
Temelj osnove in vzdržnosti je dinamično, v inovacije usmerjeno in poslovno prijazno okolje, ki upošteva usklajevanje poklicnega in zasebnega življenja in priznava potrebo ljudi po varnosti v hitro spreminjajoči se družbi.
The basis for reform and sustainability is a dynamic, innovation-oriented and business-friendly environment, which respects work-life balance and recognises the need people have for security in a rapidly changing society.
Vzdržnost je veliko večji problem celinskih in sredozemskih sistemov, kar opravičuje potrebo po tem, da proučimo nove načine financiranja sistemov socialne varnosti, na primer z ustvarjeno dodatno vrednostjo podjetij.
The sustainability problem is much more concentrated in continental and Mediterranean systems, which justifies the need to the look at new ways of financing the social security systems, such as through the added-value created by companies.
Ne smemo pozabiti, da evropska konkurenčnost in socialni model nista nasprotna si pojma, pač pa sta soodvisna.
We should bear in mind that Europe's competitiveness and social model are not opposites, but rather interdependent.
Načrt posodobitve mora temeljiti na načelu, da je socialna politika pomemben faktor gospodarske rasti in blaginje, če je le pravilno zastavljena.
The modernisation agenda should be based on the principle that social policy, if properly designed, is a productive factor of economic growth and prosperity.
V ta namen bi morale države članice celovito izvajati lizbonsko strategijo, ki je pravzaprav delovni načrt reforme.
Therefore, the Member States should comprehensively implement the Lisbon strategy, which is the road map for the reform.
Čim hitreje bi bilo treba sprejeti ustrezne smernice za to, da Evropa postane konkurenčnejša in da ustvarimo resnično družbo znanja.
The necessary steps should be taken urgently to make Europe more competitive and to create a real knowledge society.
Pri tem je pomemben koncept "prilagodljive varnosti" (an. "flexycurity), ki na eni strani pomeni večjo prilagodljivost trga delovne sile ter posodobitev organizacije dela in delovnih odnosov, na drugi strani pa večjo varnost in boljše socialno varstvo delavcev, usklajevanje poklicnega in zasebnega življenja, preusposabljanje in vseživljenjsko učenje.
Important in this respect is the "Flexicurity" concept: this means a strategy to develop more flexibility in the labour market, modernisation of work organisation and labour relations, combined with employee security and social protection, work-life balance, retraining and life-long learning.
Poskrbeti je treba za došolanje in pomoč ranljivim in zapostavljenim skupinam, ki so že na trgu delovne sile oziroma ki imajo težave pri dostopu do njega.
Provisions must be made to upskill and assist vulnerable and disadvantaged groups either in the labour market or who have difficulties in accessing the labour market.
To pa ustreza trem ključnim točkam, ki jih lizbonska strategija izpostavi na področju zaposlovanja:
This corresponds to the three key challenges of the Lisbon strategy in the field of employment:
– večja prilagodljivost delavcev,
- increasing the adaptability of workers;
– spodbude za vstop na trg delovne sile in
- encouraging more people to enter the labour market, and
– večje investicije v človeški kapital in vseživljenjsko učenje.
- investing more in human capital and lifelong learning.
Evropa ne sme opustiti smelo zastavljenih socialnih politik, ampak mora polno izkoristiti njihov možni prispevek h gospodarski učinkovitosti in kakovosti življenja:
Europe should not give up its ambitious social policies, but should make full use of their potential contribution to economic performance and quality of life.
– večja učinkovitost socialnih politik,
- enhancing efficiency of social policies,
– odprava pasti revščine in drugih ovir za delo,
- eliminating poverty traps and other disincentives to work,