natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4. poudarja, da morajo biti tradicionalni zakonodajni instrumenti še dalje običajni način za doseganje političnih ciljev, ki jih določajo Pogodbe, in meni, da je uporaba alternativnih načinov regulacije, npr. koregulacije, lahko koristna dopolnitev zakonodajnim ukrepom, ko lahko prispeva k enakovrednemu ali večjemu izboljšanju od tistega, ki ga je možno doseči prek zakonodaje; poudarja, da mora biti vsaka uporaba alternativnih načinov regulacije skladna z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom o boljšem sprejemanju zakonodaje
Stresses that traditional legislative instruments must continue to be the normal means of achieving the policy objectives laid down in the Treaties and considers that the use of alternative methods of regulation, such as co-regulation, may be a useful complement to legislative measures when they bring improvements of equivalent or broader scope than those achievable through legislation; underlines that any use of alternative methods of regulation shall be in conformity with the interinstitutional agreement on Better law-making
i) večjo odprtost,
i) greater openness,
ii) da je vsaka podelitev izvršne moči Komisiji omejena na izvršilne ukrepe in je podrejena jasni opredelitvi cilja, vsebine, dometa in trajanja prenosa oblasti,
ii) that any conferral of implementing powers on the Commission is limited to implementing measures and subject to a clear definition of the objective, content, scope and duration of the delegation of power,
iii) vzpostavitev formalne enakosti med močjo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta pri skrbnem pregledu teh ukrepov, z uvedbo ustreznih mehanizmov opozarjanja ali " klavzul o zapadlosti";
iii) the introduction of formal equality between the powers of the European Parliament and of the Council in the scrutiny of such measures via the introduction of appropriate call-back mechanisms or "sunset clauses";
10. obžaluje umik nekaterih zakonodajnih predlogov, predvsem tistih, ki zadevajo označevanje, predstavljanje in oglaševanje živil ter možnost zniževanja trošarin za biogoriva in za nekatera mineralna olja, ki vsebujejo biogoriva;
Regrets the withdrawal of some legislative proposals, in particular those concerning the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs, and the possibility of applying a reduced rate of excise duty on certain mineral oils containing biofuels and on biofuels;
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve (*)
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs
Odbor za ustavne zadeve poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ob upoštevanju dejstva, da so pobude za "poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" (poenostavitev) na dnevnem redu institucij že več kot deset let, in to v različnih oblikah in z različnimi poudarki,
A. whereas initiatives for the ‘simplification of the regulatory environment’ have been on the agenda of the institutions for over ten years using a variety of forms and approaches,
B. ob upoštevanju, da Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 25. oktobra 2005 z naslovom "Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2005)0535 ) poenostavitve z vso pravico ne predstavlja kot zakonodajno tehniko, ki se razlikuje od kodifikacije, preoblikovanja ali razveljavitve, temveč kot celovit postopek, ki vključuje omenjena orodja in je namenjen poenostavitvi in s tem pocenitvi nacionalnih predpisov in predpisov Skupnosti,
B. whereas the Commission, in its communication of 25 October 2005 entitled ‘Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’ ( COM(2005)0535 ), rightly presents simplification not as a distinct legislative technique involving codification, recasting or straightforward repeal but as an overall approach including these tools and aimed at making Community and national legislation easier to apply and hence less costly,
C. ob upoštevanju, da ta postopek Komisiji, Parlamentu in Svetu predstavlja orodje v službi lizbonske strategije,
C. whereas this approach is for the Commission, Parliament, and the Council a tool in the service of the Lisbon strategy,
D. ob upoštevanju, da takšen postopek predvideva tesno partnerstvo na tem področju najprej med evropskimi institucijami in potem med njimi in pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi,
D. whereas such an approach requires a close partnership in this area, firstly, between the European institutions and, then, between the latter and the national authorities,
E. ob upoštevanju, da so bile izkušnje Komisije, Sveta in Parlamenta v preoblikovanju zakonodajnih besedil nedavno ovrednotene v poročilu pravnih služb treh institucij, kjer so bile poudarjene določene "otroške bolezni", kakor tudi koristni napotki za v prihodnje
E. whereas the experience acquired by the Commission, the Council and Parliament with the recasting of legislation has recently been assessed in a report by the legal services of the three institutions which highlights certain teething troubles along with useful lessons for the future
Poročilo o vrednotenju izvajanja Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o bolj strukturirani uporabi tehnike preoblikovanja pravnih aktov z dne 21. septembra 2005. ,
Assessment report of 21 September 2005 on application of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts. ,
2. poudarja, da je v primeru "prestroge predpisne ureditve" na nekem področju to v veliki meri posledica zakonodajne dejavnosti držav članic, in da mora razveljavitvi predpisov Skupnosti, če do nje pride, slediti razveljavitev ustreznih nacionalnih določb;
Points out that, while there may be over-regulation in some areas, this state of affairs is due in large measure to the lawmaking activity of the Member States and that, therefore, if Community legislation is to be repealed, this must be followed by repeal of the matching national provisions;
4. ugotavlja, da je "uspeh" pobud za poenostavitev, ki prihajajo in se uresničujejo od leta 2003, zadovoljiv, in da povprečno trajanje postopkov kljub zapletenosti gradiva ni predolgo
Notes that the success rate of the simplification initiatives undertaken since 2003 is not disappointing and that the average length of procedures is not excessive given the complexity of the subject matter
Komisija v svojem prej omenjenem sporočilu v obvestilu na strani 26 spodaj navaja, da "imajo zakonodajni organi še vedno v postopku" petnajst zakonodajnih predlogov, vloženih v skladu s programom poenostavitve iz leta 2003.
The Commission points out in its above communication in a footnote on page 3 that fifteen legislative proposals tabled under the simplification programme launched in 2003 ‘are still pending before the legislator’.
5. vendar opaža, da je bilo število pobud za poenostavitev, vloženih od omenjenega datuma naprej, zelo omejeno, in da v začetku zastavljeni cilji zmanjšanja obsega pravnega reda še zdaleč niso doseženi;
Records, nevertheless, that the number of simplification initiatives launched since that date has been very limited and that the targets originally set for reducing the volume of the Community ‘ acquis ’ are far from being achieved;
9. meni, da mora biti izhodišče za takšen postopek analiza pobud za poenostavitev, ki se udejanjajo od leta 2003 dalje, analiza, ki bi lahko pozneje odprla možnosti za izboljšanje tehnik in postopkov, ki se uporabljajo v okviru Parlamenta;
Believes that the starting point for such an approach must be an analysis of the simplification initiatives launched since 2003 as a basis for subsequently identifying possible improvements to the techniques and procedures applied within Parliament;
Strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja
Strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi infrastrukture za prostorske informacije v Evropski skupnosti (INSPIRE)
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (12064/2/2005 – C6‑0054/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (12064/2/2005 – C6‑0054/2006 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 7.6.2005, P6_TA(2005)0213 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0516 )
Texts Adopted, 7.6.2005, P6_TA(2005)0213 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM (2004)0516))
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0081/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0081/2006 ),
(6) Infrastrukture za prostorske informacije v državah članicah morajo biti načrtovane tako, da zagotavljajo, da se prostorski podatki shranjujejo, so na razpolago in vzdržujejo na najprimernejši ravni; da omogočajo dosledno združevanje prostorskih podatkov iz različnih virov v Skupnosti ter možnost souporabe teh podatkov s strani več uporabnikov in aplikacij; da lahko te prostorske podatke, zbrane na eni ravni javnih organov, souporabljajo drugi javni organi, v obsegu, v katerem ta direktiva takšne javne organe zavezuje k souporabi prostorskih podatkov ; da so prostorski podatki na razpolago pod pogoji, ki njihovo široko uporabo ne omejujejo neupravičeno; da je mogoče preprosto najti razpoložljive prostorske podatke, oceniti njihovo namembno primernost in se seznaniti s pogoji njihove uporabe.
(6) The infrastructures for spatial information in the Member States should be designed to ensure that spatial data are stored, made available and maintained at the most appropriate level; that it is possible to combine spatial data from different sources across the Community in a consistent way and share them between several users and applications; that it is possible for spatial data collected at one level of public authority to be shared between other public authorities to the extent that this Directive imposes on such public authorities a duty to share spatial data ; that spatial data are made available under conditions which do not unduly restrict their extensive use; that it is easy to discover available spatial data, to evaluate their suitability for the purpose and to know the conditions applicable to their use.
(6) Infrastrukture za prostorske informacije v državah članicah morajo biti načrtovane tako, da zagotavljajo, da se prostorski podatki shranjujejo, so na razpolago in vzdržujejo na najprimernejši ravni; da omogočajo dosledno združevanje prostorskih podatkov iz različnih virov v Skupnosti ter možnost souporabe teh podatkov s strani več uporabnikov in aplikacij; da lahko prostorske podatke, zbrane na eni ravni javnih organov, souporabljajo drugi javni organi; da so prostorski podatki na razpolago pod pogoji, ki njihove široke uporabe ne omejujejo neupravičeno; da je mogoče preprosto najti razpoložljive prostorske podatke, oceniti njihovo namembno primernost in se seznaniti s pogoji njihove uporabe.
(6) The infrastructures for spatial information in the Member States should be designed to ensure that spatial data are stored, made available and maintained at the most appropriate level; that it is possible to combine spatial data from different sources across the Community in a consistent way and share them between several users and applications; that it is possible for spatial data collected at one level of public authority to be shared between other public authorities; that spatial data are made available under conditions which do not unduly restrict their extensive use; that it is easy to discover available spatial data, to evaluate their suitability for the purpose and to know the conditions applicable to their use.
(18) Izkušnje v državah članicah so pokazale, da je za uspešno izvajanje infrastrukture za prostorske informacije pomembno, da je minimalno število storitev javnosti na voljo brezplačno.
(18) Experience in the Member States has shown that it is important, for the successful implementation of an infrastructure for spatial information, that a minimum number of services be made available to the public free of charge.
Države članice morajo zato brezplačno dati na razpolago vsaj storitve iskanja zbirk prostorskih podatkov.
Member States should therefore make available, as a minimum and free of charge, the services for discovering spatial data sets.
Države članice morajo zato brezplačno dati na razpolago vsaj storitve iskanja in pregledovanja zbirk prostorskih podatkov.
Member States should therefore make available, as a minimum and free of charge, the services for discovering and viewing spatial data sets.
(20) Da bi bile informacije z različnih ravni javnih organov na razpolago, bi morale države članice odpraviti praktične ovire na tem področju, s katerimi se javni organi srečujejo na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni pri izvajanju svojih nalog javnega značaja, ki bi lahko neposredno ali posredno vplivale na okolje.
(20) In order to make information from various levels of public authority available, Member States should remove the practical obstacles faced in that regard by public authorities at national, regional and local level when performing their public tasks that may have a direct or indirect impact on the environment.
Te praktične ovire naj bi bile odpravljene povsod, kjer se informacije uporabljajo za opravljanje nalog javnega značaja.
These practical obstacles should be removed at the point where the information is to be used for the public task.
(22) Med mehanizmi za souporabo zbirk prostorskih podatkov in storitev v zvezi s prostorskimi podatki med vladnimi in drugimi javnimi organi ter fizičnimi in pravnimi osebami, ki opravljajo javne upravne funkcije po nacionalnem pravu, so lahko zakoni, uredbe, licenčni ali finančni dogovori ali upravni postopki, na primer z namenom zaščite finančne sposobnosti tistih javnih organov, ki jim je naloženo ustvarjati prihodek, ali javnih organov, katerih podatke le delno subvencionira država članica, tako da preostanek stroškov krijejo uporabniki, ali za zagotovitev upravljanja in osveževanja teh podatkov .
(22) The mechanisms for sharing spatial data sets and services between government and other public administrations and natural or legal persons performing public administrative functions under national law may involve laws, regulations, licensing or financial arrangements or administrative procedures, for instance to protect the financial viability of those public authorities that have a duty placed on them to raise revenue , or for instance whose data are only partially subsidised by the Member State so that they have to recover the unsubsidised costs by charging the users, or for instance to guarantee the maintenance and update of those data.
(22) Mehanizmi za souporabo zbirk prostorskih podatkov in storitev v zvezi s prostorskimi podatki med vladnimi in drugimi javnimi organi ter fizičnimi in pravnimi osebami, ki opravljajo javne upravne funkcije po nacionalnem pravu, morajo upoštevati potrebo po zaščiti finančne sposobnosti javnih organov , zlasti tistih , ki jim je naloženo ustvarjati dohodek .
(22) The mechanisms for sharing spatial data sets and services between government and other public administrations and natural or legal persons performing public administrative functions under national law should take into account the need to protect the financial viability of public authorities , in particular those who have a duty to raise revenue .
V nobenem primeru stroški ne smejo preseči stroškov zbiranja, priprave, reprodukcije in razširjanja.
In any event the costs should not exceed the cost of collection, production, reproduction and dissemination.
Nekoliko spremenjen člen 6 direktive o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja, ki opredeljuje načela obračunavanja.
Article 6 of the PSI directive on the principles governing charging in a reworded version.
(22a) Določbe te direktive ne vplivajo na obstoj ali lastništvo pravic intelektualne lastnine organov javnega sektorja.
(22a) The provisions of this Directive do not affect the existence or ownership of public sector authorities' intellectual property rights.
Deveti odstavek člena 17 je spremenjen in uporabljen kot uvodna izjava.
Article 17, paragraph 9 reworded and made into a recital.
(23) Države članice bi lahko v ukrepih, sprejetih za prenos zakonodaje, za javne organe, ki zagotavljajo zbirke prostorskih podatkov in storitve v zvezi s prostorskimi podatki ter zagotavljajo storitve drugim javnim organom, ki uporabljajo te nabore prostorskih podatkov in storitve v zvezi s prostorskimi podatki, predvidele možnost, da za to od njih zahtevajo dovoljenje ali plačilo.
(23) The possibility for public authorities who supply spatial data sets and services to license these sets and services to, and require payment from, other public authorities who use these spatial data sets and services could be provided for in the measures adopted by Member States in their transposition legislation.
(24) Določbe členov 13(1)(f) in 17(1) je treba izvajati in uporabljati povsem v skladu z načeli, ki zadevajo varstvo osebnih podatkov v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov.
(24) The provisions of point (f) of Article 13(1) and of Article 17(1) should be implemented and applied in full compliance with the principles relating to the protection of personal data in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data.
(18a) Omrežne storitve je treba izvajati povsem v skladu z načeli, ki zadevajo varstvo osebnih podatkov v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov.
(18a) The provision of network services should be carried out in full compliance with the principles relating to the protection of personal data in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data.
(27) Učinkovito izvajanje infrastruktur za prostorske informacije zahteva koordinacijo vseh tistih, katerim je bodisi kot vlagateljem bodisi kot uporabnikom vzpostavitev takih infrastruktur pomembna.
(27) The effective implementation of infrastructures for spatial information requires coordination by all those with an interest in the establishment of such infrastructures, whether as contributors or users.
Zato je treba vzpostaviti ustrezne koordinacijske strukture na različnih vladnih ravneh, upoštevaje porazdelitev pristojnosti in odgovornosti v državah članicah .
Appropriate coordination structures should therefore be established which extend to the various levels of government and take account of the distribution of powers and responsibilities within the Member States .
Ponovna vzpostavitev predloga spremembe 4 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of amendment 4 at first reading.
Ta direktiva ne posega v direktivi 2003/4/ES in 2003/98/ES.
This Directive is without prejudice to Directives 2003/4/EC and 2003/98/EC.
Ta direktiva ne posega v Direktivo 2003/4/ES, razen kjer je določeno drugače .
This Directive is without prejudice to Directive 2003/4/EC , save where otherwise provided .
Ta direktiva ne posega v Direktivo 2003/98/ES .
This Directive is without prejudice to Directive 2003/98/EC .
Ponovna vzpostavitev člena 3 iz predloga Komisije.
Reinstatement of Article 3 of Commission proposal.
Tehnični opis tem podatkov iz prilog I, II in III se lahko prilagodi v skladu s postopkom iz člena 22(2), da se upoštevajo razvijajoče se potrebe po prostorskih podatkih v podporo politikam Skupnosti, ki zadevajo okolje.
The technical description of the data themes referred to in Annexes I, II and III may be adapted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22(2), in order to take into account the evolving needs for spatial data in support of Community policies that affect the environment.
Teme prostorskih podatkov iz prilog I, II in III se lahko prilagodijo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 22(2), da se upoštevajo razvijajoče se potrebe po prostorskih podatkih v podporo politikam Skupnosti, ki zadevajo okolje.
The spatial data themes referred to in Annexes I, II and III may be adapted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22(2), in order to take into account the evolving needs for spatial data in support of Community policies that affect the environment.
Delna ponovna vzpostavitev predloga spremembe 10 iz prve obravnave.
Partial reinstatement of amendment 10 at first reading.
Člen 5, odstavek 2, točka (c)
Article 5, paragraph 2, point (c)
(c) kakovosti prostorskih podatkov , vključno s tem, ali so bili potrjeni ;
(c) the quality of spatial data , including whether they are validated ;
(c) kakovosti in veljavnosti prostorskih podatkov;
(c) the quality and validity of spatial data;
Ponovna vzpostavitev predloga Komisije, ki je jasnejši.
Reinstatement of Commission proposal which is clearer.
Države članice izdelajo metapodatke iz člena 5 v skladu z naslednjim časovnim razporedom:
Member States shall create the metadata referred to in Article 5 in accordance with the following timetable:
(a) najpozneje v 2 letih po datumu sprejetja izvedbenih pravil v skladu s členom 5(4) v primeru zbirk prostorskih podatkov, ki ustrezajo temam, navedenim v prilogah I in II;
(a) not later than 2 years after the date of adoption of implementing rules in accordance with Article 5(4) in the case of the spatial data sets corresponding to the themes listed in Annexes I and II;
(a) najpozneje ... * v primeru zbirk prostorskih podatkov, ki ustrezajo temam, navedenim v prilogah I in II;
(a) not later than ...* in the case of the spatial data sets corresponding to the themes listed in Annexes I and II;
(b) najpozneje v 5 letih po datumu sprejetja izvedbenih pravil v skladu s členom 5(4) v primeru zbirk prostorskih podatkov, ki ustrezajo temam, navedenim v Prilogi III.
(b) not later than 5 years after the date of adoption of implementing rules in accordance with Article 5(4) in the case of the spatial data sets corresponding to the themes listed in Annex III.
(b) najpozneje v ... ** v primeru zbirk prostorskih podatkov, ki ustrezajo temam, navedenim v Prilogi III.
(b) not later than ...** in the case of the spatial data sets corresponding to the themes listed in Annex III.
* Tri leta po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
* Three years following the date of entry into force of this Directive.
** Šest let po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
** Six years following the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Delna ponovna vzpostavitev predloga spremembe 15 iz prve obravnave.
Partial reinstatement of amendment 15 at first reading.
Komisija za podlago pri pripravi predlogov takšnih izvedbenih pravil opravi analizo izvedljivosti ter pričakovanih stroškov in koristi.
As a basis for developing the proposals for such implementing rules, the Commission shall undertake an analysis of the feasibility and expected costs and benefits.
Države članice na zahtevo Komisije tej predložijo vse informacije, potrebne za pripravo te analize .
Member States shall, on request, provide the Commission with the information necessary to enable it to prepare this analysis.
Ob predložitvi teh pravil se Komisija v zvezi z rezultati svoje analize posvetuje z državami članicami v okviru odbora iz člena 22(1).
When proposing such rules, the Commission shall consult Member States within the Committee referred to in Article 22(1) on the results of its analysis.
Sprejetje teh pravil ne sme imeti za posledico prekomernih stroškov v breme države članice.
The adoption of such rules shall not result in excessive costs to a Member State .