natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kadar se za celotno cestno omrežje TEN ne uporablja enoten cestninski režim, država članica natančno navede del oziroma dele omrežja, za katere velja cestninski režim, kakor tudi sistem, ki ga uporablja za klasifikacijo vozil za namene razlikovanja višin cestnin.
Where a single tolling regime is not to be applied to the whole TEN road network, a Member State shall specify precisely the part or parts of the network which are to be subject to a tolling regime as well as the system its uses to classify vehicles for the purposes of toll variation.
Države članice prav tako navedejo, ali njihov cestninski režim zajema tudi vozila, katerih skupna masa ne presega praga 12 ton .
Member States shall also specify whether they are extending the scope of the vehicles covered by their tolling regime below the 12 ‑tonne threshold.
Priloga III, točka 2.1, odstavek 6 (Direktiva 1999/62/ES)
Annexe III, N° 2.1, paragraph 6 (Directive 1999/62/EC)
Porazdelitev stroškov na težka tovorna vozila se izvede na objektivni in pregledni podlagi, ob upoštevanju deleža prometa težkih tovornih vozil , ki poteka prek omrežja, ter s tem povezanih stroškov.
Costs shall be apportioned to heavy goods vehicles ( HGVs ) on an objective and transparent basis taking account of the proportion of HGV traffic to be carried on the network and the associated costs.
Prevoženi kilometri, ki jih opravijo težka tovorna vozila, se lahko v ta namen prilagodijo s pomočjo uporabe objektivno utemeljenih "ekvivalenčnih faktorjev", kot so tisti, določeni v točki 4.
The vehicle kilometres travelled by HGVs may for this purpose be adjusted by objectively justified "equivalence factors" such as those set out in point 4.
Porazdelitev stroškov na tovorna vozila se izvede na objektivni in pregledni podlagi, ob upoštevanju deleža težkega tovornega prometa, ki poteka prek omrežja, ter s tem povezanih stroškov.
Costs shall be apportioned to goods vehicles on an objective and transparent basis taking account of the proportion of heavy goods traffic to be carried on the network and the associated costs.
Prevoženi kilometri, ki jih opravijo tovorna vozila, se lahko v ta namen prilagodijo s pomočjo uporabe objektivno utemeljenih "ekvivalenčnih faktorjev", kot so tisti, določeni v točki 4.
The vehicle kilometres travelled by goods vehicles may for this purpose be adjusted by objectively justified "equivalence factors" such as those set out in point 4
Priloga III, točka 4, uvodni del (Direktiva 1999/62/ES)
Annexe III, N° 4, introductory part (Directive 1999/62/EC)
Delež prometa težkih tovornih vozil , ekvivalenčni faktorji in mehanizem popravkov
HGV share of traffic, equivalence factors and correction mechanism
Delež tovornega prometa, ekvivalenčni faktorji in mehanizem popravkov
Share of goods traffic, equivalence factors and correction mechanism
Priloga III, točka 4, alinea 1 (Direktiva 1999/62/ES)
Annexe III, N° 4, indent 1 (Directive 1999/62/EC)
- Izračun cestnin temelji na dejanskih in predvidenih deležih prevoženih kilometrov težkih tovornih vozil, ki se lahko po potrebi prilagodijo z uporabo ekvivalenčnih faktorjev zaradi upoštevanja povečanih stroškov gradnje in popravil infrastrukture, ki jo uporabljajo težka tovorna vozila;
- The calculation of tolls shall be based on actual or forecast HGV shares of vehicle kilometres adjusted, if desired, by equivalence factors, to make due allowance for the increased costs of constructing and repairing infrastructure for use by heavy goods vehicles.
- Izračun cestnin temelji na dejanskih in predvidenih deležih prevoženih kilometrov težkih tovornih vozil, ki se lahko po potrebi prilagodijo z uporabo ekvivalenčnih faktorjev zaradi upoštevanja povečanih stroškov gradnje in popravil infrastrukture, ki jo uporabljajo tovorna vozila;
- The calculation of tolls shall be based on actual or forecast HGV shares of vehicle kilometres adjusted, if desired, by equivalence factors, to make due allowance for the increased costs of constructing and repairing infrastructure for use by goods vehicles.
Therefore an amendment is tabled which stated that exemptions should be subject to objective criteria regarding congestion and pollution level .
Therefore an amendment is tabled which stated that exemptions should be subject to objective criteria regarding congestion and pollution level.
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 1999/62/ES o cestnih pristojbinah za uporabo določene infrastrukture za težka tovorna vozila
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures
o spodbujanju in varovanju interesov potrošnikov v novih državah članicah
on the promotion and protection of consumers' interests in the new Member States
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6‑0378/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0378/2005 ),
A. ker je visoka raven varstva in zaupanja potrošnikov predpogoj za dobro delovanje notranjega trga,
A. whereas a high level of consumer protection and consumer confidence is a precondition for a well functioning internal market,
B. ker je notranji trg z zniževanjem cen in večanjem izbire prinesel dejanske koristi za potrošnike v EU,
B. whereas the internal market has delivered tangible benefits for consumers in the EU, through lowering prices and widening choice,
C. ker ima EU deset novih držav članic, v katerih je varstvo potrošnikov večinoma dokaj nova skrb,
C. whereas the EU has ten new Member States, in most of which consumer protection is a relatively new concern,
3. opozarja tudi, kako pomemben je člen 153 Pogodbe, ki državam članicam omogoča ohranjanje ali uvedbo strožjih zaščitnih ukrepov;
Recalls also the importance of Article 153 of the Treaty, which allows Member States to maintain or introduce more stringent protective measures;
Pravni okvir
Legislative framework
6. poziva h krepitvi struktur nadzora trga v novih državah članicah, da izdelki in storitve, ki krožijo na njihovih trgih, izpolnjujejo zahteve visokih standardov varnosti in da se kakršni koli poškodovani ali nevarni izdelki hitro umaknejo s trga;
Calls for the strengthening of market surveillance structures in the new Member States so that products and services circulating on their markets meet high safety standards and that any defective or dangerous products are rapidly removed from the market;
8. poziva Komisijo, naj pomaga izboljšati uspešnost nadzornih organov v novih državah članicah in usklajevanje med njimi, vključno z vzajemnim čezmejnim sodelovanjem;
Calls on the Commission to help improve the performance of, and coordination between, supervisory bodies in the new Member States, including cross-border mutual cooperation between them;
11. pozdravlja predlog Komisije za razvoj in posodobitev baze znanstvenega znanja in ocenjevalnih orodij za izpostavljenost potrošnikov kemikalijam, vključno s splošno varnostjo izdelkov, in za prispevek k izvajanju uredbe REACH;
Welcomes the Commission proposal to develop and update the scientific knowledge base and assessment tools on consumer exposure to chemicals, including with respect to general product safety, and to contribute to the application of the REACH regulation;
12. poudarja, da je ustvarjanje "potrošniške kulture", ki temelji na višji ravni osveščenosti potrošnika, bistveno za boljše izvajanje in uporabljanje obstoječega pravnega okvira in poudarja pomembno vlogo potrošniških organizacij, organov za varstvo potrošnikov in poslovnih organizacij pri krepitvi potrošniške kulture;
Stresses that the creation of a "consumer culture" based on a higher level of consumer awareness is essential for better enforcement and application of the existing legal framework and underlines the vital role that consumer organisations, consumer protection authorities and business organisations play in strengthening this consumer culture;
Potrošniške organizacije
Consumer organisations
17. poudarja, da nevladne in neprofitne organizacije v novih državah članicah praviloma nimajo potrebnega lastnega kapitala, zbiranje finančnih sredstev ni dovolj razvito, potrošniki sami pa niso pripravljeni iz svojega žepa prispevati za potrošniške organizacije zaradi prepričanja, da je za varstvo potrošnikov odgovorna samo država;
17 Points out that in the new Member States it is generally the case that non-governmental, non-profit-making organisations do not have the necessary own capital, that fundraising is not adequately developed and that consumers themselves are unwilling to contribute out of their own pockets to consumer organisations on account of the enduring belief that the state alone is responsible for protecting consumers;
19. poudarja, da močne in neodvisne potrošniške organizacije omogočajo osnovo za učinkovito potrošniško politiko; zato poziva potrošniške organizacije, da ustvarijo krovne organizacije in sodelujejo med seboj; poziva tudi vlade novih držav članic, da spodbujajo ustvarjanje manjših, a močnejših organizacij s postopnim in učinkovitim financiranjem;
Emphasises that strong and independent consumer organisations provide the basis for an effective consumer policy; calls therefore on consumer organisations to create umbrella organisations and to cooperate with each other; calls also on the governments of the new Member States to foster the creation of fewer, yet stronger organisations through progressive and efficient financing;
21. poziva vlade novih držav članic, da zagotovijo ustrezno posvetovanje s potrošniškimi organizacijami na vseh ravneh postopka političnega odločanja in pri izvajanju prava varstva potrošnikov;
Calls on the governments of the new Member States to ensure that consumer organisations are adequately consulted in all stages of the political decision-making process and in the implementation of consumer law;
Poslovne organizacije
Business organisations
Organi za varstvo potrošnikov
Consumer protection authorities
29. poziva organe za varstvo potrošnikov, poslovne organizacije in organizacije potrošnikov držav članic, naj tesno sodelujejo, da bi spodbudili varstvo potrošnikov; ugotavlja, da je gladko delovanje trga v interesu vseh zadevnih strani;
Urges the Member States’ consumer protection authorities, business organisations and consumer organisations to work in close cooperation to promote consumer protection; notes that the smooth running of the market is in the interest of all parties concerned;
Informacije za potrošnike
Consumer information
33. pozdravlja dejstvo, da Komisija izvaja kampanje za povečanje osveščenosti v številnih državah članicah in spodbuja Komisijo, da nameni več finančnih in človeških virov v ta namen.
Welcomes the fact that the Commission is carrying out awareness-raising campaigns in a number of Member States and encourages the Commission to devote more financial and human resources to this purpose;
35. priporoča, da organizacije potrošnikov izdajajo preskusne časopise v novih državah članicah; poziva Komisijo in nove države članice, da zagotovijo, vsaj na začetku, zadostno financiranje in usposabljanje, da se omogoči razvoj takšnega izdajanja;
Recommends the publishing of test magazines by consumer organisations in the new Member States; calls on the Commission and the new Member States, at least initially, to ensure that sufficient financing and training is provided to enable the development of such publications;
37. poziva Komisijo k ustanovitvi mehanizmov spremljanja nacionalnih potrošniških politik, meril in priporočil, da se prepoznajo najboljše prakse in se razvije statistika, kazalci in ostali podatki, potrebni za potrošnike, vključno z raziskavami o spremljanju cen in kakovosti;
Calls on the Commission to establish monitoring mechanisms for national consumer policies, benchmarks and recommendations in order to identify best practices, and to develop statistics, indicators, and other data of interest to consumers, including a price observatory and quality surveys;
Reševanje sporov
Dispute resolution
41. v vseh državah članicah spodbuja ustanovitev neodvisnih agencij za varstvo potrošnikov z vsemi pooblastili za sprožitev postopkov pred nacionalnimi sodišči, da bi zaščitili interese potrošnikov;
Encourages the establishment in all Member States of independent consumer protection agencies with full power to bring proceedings before national courts in order to protect the interests of consumers;
43. poudarja, da bi morale institucije EU ostati osredotočene na varstvo potrošnikov v novih državah članicah, ker v zvezi s tem še vedno obstajajo pereča vprašanja, ki so zastavljena v tej resoluciji;
Stresses that the EU institutions should maintain their focus on consumer protection in the new Member States, since there are still serious issues of concern in this regard, as raised by this resolution;
Spodbujanje in varovanje interesov potrošnikov v novih državah članicah
Promotion and protection of consumers' interests in the new Member States
Poročevalec (-ka) Datum imenovanja:
Rapporteur (s) Date appointed
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko, s katerim se na Dansko razširjajo določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 343/2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države, in Uredbe (ES) št. 2725/2000 o vzpostavitvi sistema „Eurodac“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe Dublinske konvencije
on the proposal for a Council decision on the signing of the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark extending to Denmark the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national and Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 concerning the establishment of “Eurodac” for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2004)0594 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0594 )
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko (14787/1/2004),
– having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark (14787/2004),
– ob upoštevanju člena 63(1)(a) in prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 63(1)(a) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0198/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0198/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 51 in 83(7) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 51 and Rule 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0379/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0379/2005 ),
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko, s katerim se na Dansko razširjajo določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 343/2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države, in Uredbe (ES) št. 2725/2000 o vzpostavitvi sistema „Eurodac“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe Dublinske konvencije
Proposal for a Council decision on the signing of the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark extending to Denmark the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national and Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 concerning the establishment of “Eurodac” for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi protokola k Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o kriterijih in mehanizmih za določitev države, odgovorne za obravnavo prošnje za azil, vložene v državi članici, na Islandiji ali na Norveškem
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Iceland or Norway
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI.....................................11
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS CONCERNING THE LEGAL BASIS 11
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2005)0131 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0131 )
– ob upoštevanju protokola k Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško (8479/2005),
– having regard to the Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway (8479/2005),
– ob upoštevanju člena 63, prvi pododstavek, točka 1(a), in prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 63(1)(a) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0197/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0197/2005 ),
- ob upoštevanju pristojnosti, ki jih priznava ta protokol skupnemu odboru, ki je bil ustanovljen s Sporazumom med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško,
– having regard to the powers and responsibilities conferred under the Protocol on the Joint Committee set up pursuant to the Agreement between the European Community, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway,
– ob upoštevanju skupnega odbora, ki predstavlja 'posebni institucionalni okvir' v smislu drugega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES,
– whereas that Joint Committee constitutes 'a specific institutional framework' within the meaning of Article 300(3), second subparagraph of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve, ki upošteva drugi pododstavek člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, ki predvideva uporabo postopka soglasja kot ustrezno pravno osnovo,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs, which deems Article 300(3), second subparagraph of the EC Treaty (which stipulates application of the assent procedure) to be the appropriate legal basis,
– ob upoštevanju členov 51, 83(7) in 35 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 51, Rule 83(7) and Rule 35 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0380/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0380/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 63(1)(a) v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in prvim pododstavkom člena 300(3),
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 63(1)(a), taken in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 63(1)(a) v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3),
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 63(1)(a), taken in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
Navedba sklicevanja 2
Citation 3
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,
ob upoštevanju soglasja Evropskega parlamenta,
Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament,
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS CONCERNING THE LEGAL BASIS
Pismo Odbora za pravne zadeve
Letter from the Committee on Legal Affairs
Še neobjavljeno v UL. ,
Not yet published in the OJ.
V pismu z dne 23. junija 2005 ste skladno s členom 35(2) Poslovnika Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosili za mnenje o pravilnosti in primernosti pravne podlaga omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 23 June 2005 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs (pursuant to Rule 35(2) of the Rules of Procedure) to consider the validity and the appropriateness of the legal basis selected for the above Commission proposal.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je zadevo obravnaval na seji 13. julija 2005.
The Committee considered the matter at its meeting of 13 July 2005.
Predlog temelji na točki 1a člena 63(1)(a) v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES.
The proposal is based on Article 63, first paragraph, figure 1(a), in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence and Article 300(3), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty.
V takšnem primeru je zahtevano enostavno posvetovanje s Parlamentom.
This means that Parliament merely has to be consulted.
Evropska skupnost je 19. januarja 2001 sklenila z Republiko Islandijo in Kraljevino Norveško Sporazum o kriterijih in mehanizmih za določitev države, odgovorne za obravnavo prošnje za azil, vložene v državi članici, na Islandiji ali na Norveškem
On 19 January 2001 the European Community concluded with the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway an agreement concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Iceland or Norway
Člen 12 tega sporazuma določa, da lahko Danska zaprosi za sodelovanje v tem sporazumu in da Skupnost, Norveška in Islandija s soglasjem Danske v Protokolu k temu sporazumu določijo pogoje za takšno sodelovanje.
Pursuant to Article 12 of the agreement, Denmark may ask to be allowed to participate in the Agreement and the Community, Norway and Iceland (acting with the consent of Denmark) shall determine the conditions for such participation in a Protocol to the Agreement.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ni sodelovala pri sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 343/2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države („Uredba Dublin II“), in Uredbe (ES) št. 2725/2000 o vzpostavitvi sistema „Eurodac“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe Dublinske konvencije („Uredba Eurodac“), ki ju je sprejel Svet.
Pursuant to Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on Denmark which is appended to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark has not participated in the adoption by the Council of Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national ('Dublin II Regulation') and Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 concerning the establishment of 'Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention (‘Eurodac Regulation’).
Vendar je Danska pogodbenica Konvencije o določanju države, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošenj za azil, vloženih v državi članici Evropskih skupnosti („Dublinska konvencija“), podpisane v Dublinu dne 15. junija 1990.
However, Denmark is party to the Convention on the determining of the State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States (the ‘Dublin Convention’), which was signed in Dublin on 15 June 1990.