natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vsebovati mora tudi podatke o sistemih energetske presoje, o uporabi finančnih inštrumentov za varčevanje z energijo, o izboljšanem merjenju porabe in o informativnem obračunu.
It shall also include information on energy audit schemes, on the use of financial instruments for energy savings, on improved metering of consumption, and on informative billing.
Vključeni morajo biti tudi podatki o pričakovanem vplivu in financiranju ukrepov.
Information on the expected impact and financing of the measures should also be included.
Vključeni morajo biti tudi podatki o pričakovanem ekonomskem vplivu in financiranju ukrepov.
Information on the expected economic impact and financing of the measures should also be included.
Ne pozneje od dveh let po sprejetju te direktive in vsake tri leta do leta 2012 in vključno z njim države članice predložijo Komisiji poročilo o svoji uspešnosti pri doseganju cilja o nacionalnem letnem prihranku energije, kot je določen v členu 4(1), o cilju javnega sektorja, kot je določen v členu 5(1), in o razvoju energetskih storitev, kot je določen v členu 6(a).
Not later than 2 years after adoption of this Directive and every three years thereafter up to and including 2012, Member States shall submit to the Commission a report on their success in meeting the national annual energy savings target, as set out in Article 4(1), on the public sector target, as set out in Article 5(1) and on the development of energy services, as set out in Article 6(a).
Vpliv ukrepov iz prejšnjih let, ki je bil upoštevan v obračunu prihrankov, bo pravilno določen in kvantificiran.
The effect of measures of previous years that has been taken into account in the calculation of the savings shall be duly specified and quantified.
V poročilu je zajeto, da se bo to nadaljevalo do zadnjega leta cilja, določenega v členih 4 in 5.
This shall continue until the final year of the target set out in Article 4 and 5 is reported on.
Ne pozneje v letu dni po sprejetju te direktive in vsake tri leta do leta 2012 in vključno z njim države članice predložijo Komisiji poročilo o svoji uspešnosti pri doseganju cilja o nacionalnem letnem prihranku energije, kot je določen v členu 4(1), o cilju javnega sektorja, kot je določen v členu 5(1), in o razvoju energetskih storitev, kot je določen v členu 6(a).
Not later than one year after adoption of this Directive and every three years thereafter up to and including 2012, Member States shall submit to the Commission a report on their success in meeting the national annual energy savings target, as set out in Article 4(1), on the public sector target, as set out in Article 5(1) and on the development of energy services, as set out in Article 6(a).
Na osnovi poročil držav članic Komisija oceni do kakšne mere so države članice napredovale pri doseganju njihovih nacionalnih ciljev.
On the basis of the Member States' reports the Commission shall assess to what extent Member States have made progress towards achieving their national targets.
Komisija objavi svoje zaključke v poročilu, prvič najpozneje 3 leta po sprejetju te direktive in vsake tri leta zatem.
The Commission shall publish its conclusions in a report, for the first time not later than 3 years after adoption of this Directive and thereafter every three years.
Poročilu so priloženi, če je to primerno in kjer je to potrebno, predlogi Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu za dodatne ukrepe.
This report shall be accompanied, as appropriate and where necessary, by proposals to the European Parliament and to the Council for additional measures.
Komisija objavi svoje zaključke v poročilu, prvič najpozneje eno leto po sprejetju te direktive in vsake tri leta zatem.
The Commission shall publish its conclusions in a report, for the first time not later than 3 years after adoption of this Directive and thereafter every three years.
Ta priloga se črta.
This annex is deleted
Stroškovna učinkovitost posameznih ukrepov je nejasna, v nekaterih primerih celo dvomljiva.
The cost-effectiveness of the individual measures is at least not clear, and in some cases even doubtful.
Zato Priloga III ne bi smela imeti uradnega statusa kot Priloga k Direktivi.
Therefore annex III should not have a formal status as an Annex to the directive.
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o učinkoviti končni rabi energije in energetskih storitvah
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy end-use efficiency and energy services
Datum razglasitve na plenarnem zasedanju
Date announced in plenary
MNENJE ODBORA ZA OKOLJE, JAVNO ZDRAVJE IN VARNO HRANO
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY
zaOdbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko
for the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Pripravljavka mnenja: Eija-Riitta Anneli Korhola
Draftswoman: Eija-Riitta Anneli Korhola
Pripravljavki osnutka se je zdel predlog Direktive o učinkoviti končni rabi energije in energetskih storitvah zelo pomemben prispevek v boju proti spremembam podnebja in k povečanju tako zelo potrebne učinkovitosti pri rabi energije.
The draftswoman found this proposal for a Directive on energy end-use efficiency and energy services a very important contribution to the fight against climate change and to increase the much needed efficiency in energy end-use.
Po njenem mnenju predlog ne upošteva prvotnih ukrepov, ki se že izvajajo, in državam članicam ne daje dovolj prilagodljivosti za doseganje predlaganih ciljev.
In her view, however, this proposal fails to take into account the early actions already in place, and does not provide enough flexibility for the Member States in reaching the proposed targets.
Ustvarjanje novega trga za energetske storitve in spreminjanje energetske učinkovitosti v sestavni del notranjega trga sta nujna, toda predlagane metode bi samo oteževale položaj dejavnikov na trgu.
Furthermore she was of the opinion that the creation of a new market for energy services and making energy efficiency an integral part of the internal market was necessary, but the proposed methods would only frustrate the market players.
Vendar Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane tu ni upošteval njenega mnenja.
However, the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety did not follow her opinion on this point.
Po mnenju pripravljavke osnutka predlagani letni splošni prihranek 1,5 % in letni prihranek v javnem sektorju 1,5 % bi utegnila biti dobra cilja tudi za EU kot celoto.
In the draftswoman's view the proposed annual 1% general savings target and the annual 1,5 % savings target for the public sector may be good targets for the EU as a whole.
Če pa poskušamo po drugi strani te cilje uveljaviti na enak način v vseh sektorjih in v vseh državah članicah, ne bomo dosegli trajnih rezultatov.
However, if these targets are applied in a uniform way to each sector and each Member State, it will not lead to sustainable results.
Komisija je ugotovila pomembno število stroškovno učinkovitih ukrepov varčevanja.
The Commission has identified an important number of cost-effective saving measures.
Pripravljavka osnutka je tako predlagala mogoč letni cilj stroškovno učinkovitih varčevalnih ukrepov 5 %, ki bi ga kot enako breme uveljavili v vseh sektorjih in vseh državah članicah, čeprav to, po njenem mnenju, dokler pomeni izraz stroškovno učinkovito „ukrepe, s katerimi stroški ne presegajo prednosti“, sploh ne bi smelo biti breme.
The draftswoman therefore proposed an annual 5 % target of the cost-effective saving measures potential to impose on all sectors and all Member States an equal burden, although, in her view, as long as cost effective is defined as "measures where the costs do not exceed the benefits" it should not be a burden at all.
Toda odbor ni upošteval predlogov sprememb v tej smeri.
Yet, the Committee did not accept the amendment going in this direction.
Da bi ustvarili zadostno količino za take storitve v začetni fazi, bi se teoretično lahko dogovorili za brezplačne energetske presoje, vendar bi izterjava stroškov iz energetskih tarif pomenila kršitev pravnega reda Skupnosti.
In order to create a sufficient volume for such services in the initial phase the free energy audits could in theory be agreed, but recovering such costs from the energy tariffs would be in breach of Community law.
Interese strank, ki ne bi imele koristi od takih energetskih presoj, je treba zaščititi, države članice pa bi morali spodbujati k uporabi drugih vzgibov za ustvarjanje povpraševanja po takih presojah.
The interest of customers who will not benefit from such energy audits needs to be protected, Member States should therefore be encouraged to use other incentives to create a demand for such audits.
Pripravljavka je predlagala nekaj sprememb v zvezi z energijo v prevoznem sektorju.
The draftswoman has also proposed a few amendments on the issue of energy for the transport sector.
Ekološko zelo pomemben vpliv se lahko doseže tudi s pretvorbo energije in z opremo za porabo energije.
An ecologically very important impact can also be achieved through the conversion of energy and energy consuming equipment.
Pripravljavka je zato predlagala spremembo posebej v zvezi s to zadevo, ki jo je sprejel odbor.
The draftswoman has therefore proposed an amendment to address this issue specifically which was accepted by the Committee.
Sklicevanje na „monterje opreme“ je zastarel.
The reference to "equipment installers" is outdated.
Obseg njihovih dejavnosti se je namreč razširil, saj poleg namestitev izvajajo tudi vzdrževanje, preglede, presoje in izdajo potrdil ter svetujejo v zvezi s porabo energije.
They have widened their scope of activities, in addition to installations, they also do maintenance work, conduct inspections, audits and certifications, and give advice on energy use.
Pripravljavka osnutka se sicer zaveda izredne pomembnosti te teme, a je priporočala Komisiji, da umakne predlog, če varčevalni cilji ne bodo bolj prilagodljivi in če se prvotni ukrepi, ki jih države članice že izvajajo na področju učinkovite končne rabe energije, ne bodo bolj upoštevali.
While realising the utmost importance of this issue, the draftswoman still recommended the Commission to withdraw its proposal, unless the saving targets were made more flexible and early actions already taken by the Member States in the field of energy end-use efficiency were taken more into account.
Kasneje je umaknila svoj predlog spremembe, ki je zavračal predlog Komisije.
Later, she withdrew her amendment rejecting the Commission proposal.
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
UL C ... / Še neobjavljeno v UL.
OJ C ... / Not yet published in OJ.
(2a) Za dosego splošnega cilja preprečevanja nevarnih podnebnih sprememb z ohranjanjem povprečne globalne temperature pod 2 °C nad predindustrijsko stopnjo se morajo izvajati konkretne politike in ukrepi.
(2a) In order to achieve the general objective of preventing dangerous climate change by keeping the global mean temperature below a peak of 2°C above pre-industrial levels, concrete policies and measures must be implemented.
Kot je opozorila Komisija v obrazložitvenem memorandumu, „ta cilj prihranka energije ne izključuje možnosti za povečanje porabe energije, na primer zaradi večje gospodarske rasti ali strukturnih sprememb.
As pointed out by the Commission in its explanatory memorandum, "this target for energy savings does not preclude the possibility for energy consumption to increase, due, for example, to strong economic growth or structural changes.
(2b) Predlagani cilji prihranka energije ne vodijo samodejno do manjše porabe energije v posamezni državi članici ali na ravni EU in zato ne povzročijo samodejno izpolnitve splošnih ciljev preprečevanja nevarnih podnebnih sprememb.
(2b) The proposed targets for energy savings do not automatically lead to energy reduction in each Member State or at EU level, and therefore do not automatically achieve the general objective of preventing dangerous climate change.
Enaka obrazložitev kot pri uvodni izjavi (2a) novo.
Same justification as to Recital (2a) new.
Uvodna izjava 6a (novo)
Recital 6 a (new)
(7) Svet je v svoji resoluciji z dne 7. decembra 1998 o energetski učinkovitosti v Evropski skupnosti za Skupnost kot celoto potrdil cilje o boljši energetski intenzivnosti končne porabe z eno dodatno odstotno točko na leto do leta 2010.
(7) In its Resolution of 7 December 1998 on energy efficiency in the European Community, the Council endorsed a target for the Community as a whole to improve energy intensity of final consumption by an additional one percentage point per annum up to the year 2010.
Poleg tega je Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 14. marca 2001 o akcijskem načrtu za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti v Evropski skupnosti 1 na primer obžaloval, da Komisija ni zagotovila podrobne in pregledne evidence svoje ocene in da je določila cilj za zmanjšanje energetske intenzivnosti na en odstotek letno; poziva, da bi moralo biti doseženo letno znižanje končne energetske intenzivnosti za 2,5 %, če bo za to obstajala velika politična volja.
Moreover, in its resolution of 14 March 2001 on the Action Plan to Improve Energy Efficiency in the European Community 1 , the European Parliament for example regretted that the Commission had not provided a detailed and transparent account of its estimate, putting the target for reduction in energy intensity at one percentage point per year, and called for a more ambitious target in reiterating its earlier opinion that annual reductions in final energy intensity of 2,5% ought to be achievable, provided a strong political will exists.
To poročilo navaja prejšnje stališče Parlamenta o energetski učinkovitosti in vsebuje med drugim številne obrazložitve o predlaganju višjih ciljev.
This report states the Parliament’s earlier position on energy efficiency and contains among other a lot of justification for why proposing higher targets.
(8) Države članice bi zato morale sprejeti nacionalne cilje za spodbujanje učinkovite končne rabe energije in za zagotavljanje trajne rasti in rentabilnosti trga z energetskimi storitvami.
(8) Member States should therefore adopt national targets to promote energy end-use efficiency and to ensure the continued growth and viability of the market for energy services.
(8) Države članice morajo zato sprejeti nacionalne cilje, določene v členih 4(2) in5(2) za spodbujanje učinkovite končne rabe energije in za zagotavljanje trajne rasti in rentabilnosti trga z energetskimi storitvami.
(8) Member States must therefore adopt the national targets set out in Article 4(2) and Article 5(2) to promote energy end-use efficiency and to ensure the continued growth and viability of the market for energy services.
Ker je bila ocena potenciala za prihranke energije narejena, ko je bila poraba energije še veliko manjša, je danes stroškovno učinkovit potencial prihranka veliko večji.
Since the estimated potential for energy savings was made some time ago , when the energy prices were significantly lower, the potential for cost-effective savings are considerably larger today.
To je močan argument za določitev cilja, višjega od 1 %, ki ga je prvotno predlagala Komisija.
This is a strong argument for setting a target that is higher than the 1% originally proposed by the Commission.
Porast cen energije in dejstvo, da so cene za energetsko učinkovite tehnologije padle, odkar se je začela pripravljati Direktiva, ker kaže, da so posledice podnebnih sprememb vse hujše in ker države lahko upoštevajo izvedene horizontalne ukrepe – vse to govori v prid višjim ciljem.
The increase in energy prices together with the fact that prices for energy efficient technologies have decreased since the Directive was being prepared and since the consequences of climate change appears increasingly serious, and furthermore since countries can count horizontal measures undertaken - all this talks in favour of a higher target.
(Na primer: cena nafte/sod je leta 1998 znašala 3 USD, v letih 2000–02 25–29 USD, sredi novembra 2004 pa okrog 45 USD).
(For ex t he oil price/barrel was 13 $ in 1998, 25-29 $ 2000-02 and in mid November -04 around 45 $).
(11) Distribucija energije in maloprodajna podjetja za prodajo energije lahko izboljšajo učinkovito rabo energije v Evropski skupnosti, če bodo tržili energetske storitve, ki vključujejo učinkovito rabo, na primer učinkovito toplotno zaščito, toplo sanitarno vodo, hlajenje, razsvetljavo in pogonsko silo vozil.
(11) Energy distribution and retail energy sales companies can improve energy efficiency in the European Community if energy services are marketed that include efficient end use, such as efficient thermal comfort, domestic hot water, refrigeration, illumination and motive power.
Večanje dobička teh podjetij tako postane bolj povezano s prodajo energetskih storitev čim več strankam, namesto da prodajajo kolikor je mogoče veliko energije eni stranki.
Profit maximisation for these companies thus becomes more closely related to selling energy services to as many customers as possible instead of selling as much energy as possible to each customer.
Uvodna izjava 11a (novo)
Recital 11 a (new)
Države članice lahko izvzamejo male distributerje ali maloprodajna podjetja iz področja uporabe te direktive.
Member States can exclude small distributors or retail energy sales companies from the application of this Directive.
Države članice lahko sprejmejo odločbo za delno prostovoljno možnost izbire, da izvzamejo male distributerje ali maloprodajna podjetja iz področja uporabe te direktive.
Member States may make provision for a partial voluntary opt-out for small distributors or retail energy sales companies from the application of this Directive.
Mala podjetja bi morala imeti možnost umika, vendar bi morala pri tem za njih veljati definicija „končnega uporabnika“.
Small companies should be able to opt out, but in doing so be covered by the definition of “final customer”.
Glej spremembo člena 3, točka f.
See amendment on Article 3, point f.
(f) „Končni uporabnik“: končna stranka v gospodinjstvu, kmetijskem, trgovskem, javnem, industrijskem sektorju (razen namestitev, ki so navedene v Prilogi I k Direktivi št. 2003/87/ES, in tistih industrijskih dejavnosti, ki so navedene v Prilogi I k Direktivi št. 1996/61/ES) in v prevoznem sektorju (razen prevoznih sredstev v letalstvu in pomorskem prevozu).
(f) "Final customer": end-use customer in the household, agricultural, commercial, public, industrial sector (excluding those installations listed in Annex I of Directive 2003/87/EC and those industrial activities listed in Annex I of Directive 1996/61/EC) and in the transport sector (excluding means of transport in aviation and maritime shipping).
V to definicijo so vključeni mali distributerji ali maloprodajna podjetja za prodajo energije z možnostjo umika v skladu s členom 2(2).
Small distributors or retail energy sales companies using the opt-out pursuant to Article 2(2) are covered by this definition.
Noben distributer ne bo povsem izključen iz področja uporabe te direktive; če se ne upoštevajo kot distributerji, se morajo upoštevati kot končni uporabniki.
No distributor should fall totally out of the scope of this Directive; they should be considered as final customers if not distributors.
Člen 3, točka (o a) (novo)
Article 3, point (o a) (new)
(oa) „Stroškovno učinkoviti ukrepi“: kjer stroški ne presegajo prednosti v določenem času; kjer se uporabljajo socialni stroški, je treba stroškovno učinkovitost ovrednotiti v primerjavi s socialnimi koristmi.
(oa)"Cost-effective measures": where the costs do not exceed the benefits within a set time frame; where social costs are used, cost effectiveness should be evaluated against social benefits.
Zagotavlja pojasnila.
Provides clarification.
Skladno z obrazložitvijo predlagane Direktive s strani Komisije: „[v] odsotnosti manjšega udobja ali zmanjšanega življenjskega standarda je zato možno zmanjšanje porabe energije za najmanj eno petino brez dodatnih neto stroškov – in v številnih primerih brez negativnih stroškov.“ Čeprav imajo prihranki energije pozitiven vpliv na konkurenco, zaposlovanje, trgovinsko balanco, regijske in povezovalne učinke v EU, pa tudi na sprožitev manjše odvisnosti EU od energije, Komisija te konzervativne ocene ni oblikovala v dosledne cilje.
According to the Commission explanatory statement of the proposed Directive itself: "[w]ithout reducing comfort or standards of living, it is therefore possible to reduce energy consumption by at least one-fifth at no extra net cost –and in many cases negative costs" While adding positive impacts of energy savings on EU competitiveness, employment, trade balance, regional and cohesion effects as well as inducing reduction of EU energy dependency, the Commission however did not translate this conservative estimate into a consistent target.
Poleg tega horizontalni ukrepi in vračanje v leto 1991, tako kot je to predlagala Komisija, oslabijo resnični učinek predlaganega cilja.
Furthermore, horizontal measures and going back up to 1991 as proposed by the Commission undermine the real effect of the proposed target.
2,5-odstotni cilj je zato primernejši za dosego trajnega varčevanja z energijo.
A 2.5% target is therefore more appropriate in order to achieve a sustainable energy economy.
3-odstotni cilj je zato primeren za dosego trajnega in podnebju prijaznega varčevanja z energijo.
A 3% target is therefore appropriate in order to achieve a sustainable energy economy as well as a climate friendly one.
Člen 5, odstavek 4, uvodni del
Article 5, paragraph 4, introductory part
Države članice lahko za dosego cilja, sprejetega v skladu z odstavkom 1, uporabljajo zlasti smernice javnega odkupa, da omogočijo javni upravi, da vključi učinkovito rabo energije v svoje naložbe in proračune za delovanje ter dejavnosti, in to z uporabo energetskih storitev, programov ter drugih ukrepov za učinkovito rabo energije.
To achieve the target adopted pursuant to paragraph 1, Member States can in particular use public purchasing guidelines to enable public administrations to integrate energy efficiency considerations into their investment and operating budgets and activities through the use of energy services, energy efficiency programmes and other energy efficiency measures.
Smernice lahko ob upoštevanju postopkov, vsebovanih v nacionalni zakonodaji in zakonodaji javnih naročil v Skupnosti, vsebujejo naslednje:
While respecting the procedures enshrined in national and Community public procurement legislation, the guidelines may cover the following:
Države članice za dosego cilja, sprejetega v skladu z odstavkom 1, določijo smernice javnega odkupa, ki zahtevajo , da javna uprava vključi učinkovito rabo energije v svoje naložbe in proračune za delovanje ter dejavnosti, in to z uporabo energetskih storitev, programov ter drugih ukrepov za učinkovito rabo energije in da energetska učinkovitost postane glavno merilo presoje pri objavi razpisov o javnih naročilih .
To achieve the target adopted pursuant to paragraph 1, Member States shall lay down public purchasing guidelines requiring public administrations to integrate energy efficiency considerations into their investment and operating budgets and activities through the use of energy services, energy efficiency programmes and other energy efficiency measures and to establish energy efficiency as a major assessment criterion when issuing public procurement tenders .
Za spodbujanje ponudbe in sprožitev pravega povpraševanja po energetskih storitvah je pomembno ustvarjanje določenega temeljnega povpraševanja že od samega začetka.
In order not only to promote the supply side, but also to initiate genuine demand for energy services, it is important to generate a certain basic demand from the outset.
Zahteva po energetsko učinkoviti oskrbi javnega sektorja bi lahko imela spodbuden učinek na strani povpraševanja.
Requiring energy-efficient procurement of the public sector could have a stimulating effect on the demand side.