natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalke ne prepričajo večkrat ponovljeni argumenti Pakistana, da odsotnost kašmirskega predstavništva v pakistanski narodni skupščini odraža dejstvo, da Pakistan ne šteje Kašmirja kot dela svoje federacije, glede na to, da se pakistanska zakonodaja z le občasnimi spremembami uporablja v vsej provinci Azad Džam in Kašmir ter v Gilgitu in Baltistanu, v skladu s prilagoditvenim aktom s 1. januarja 2005.
The rapporteur is not convinced by Pakistan's oft-repeated argument that the absence of Kashmiri representation in the Pakistan National Assembly reflects the fact that Pakistan does not consider Kashmir as part of its federation, given that Pakistan legislation applies with only occasional modifications throughout Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Gilgit and Baltistan under the Adaptation Act of 1 January 2005.
Tako imenovani "začasni ustavni akt" iz leta 1974 dovoljuje številne institucije, ki jih imajo samoupravne države, vključno z zakonodajno skupščino, izvoljeno na rednih volitvah, predsednika vlade, ki obvladuje večino v skupščini, posredno izvoljenega predsednika, neodvisno sodstvo in institucije lokalne oblasti.
The so-called 'Interim Constitution Act' of 1974 allows for many of the structures that comprise a self-governing state, including a legislative assembly elected through periodic elections, a prime minister who commands the majority in the assembly, an indirectly elected president, an independent judiciary, and local government institutions.
Vendar te določbe ne odražajo realnosti.
But these provisions are very hollow.
Najvišjo oblast v državi ima svet province Azad Džamu in Kašmir, ki mu predseduje predsednik pakistanske vlade in v katerem je večina iz njegove vlade ali imenovanih članov.
The powers of state are held by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council, chaired by the Prime Minister of Pakistan and with a majority from his Cabinet or by appointment.
Poleg tega lahko v skladu z oddelkom 56 začasnega ustavnega akta Džamuja in Kašmirja (ki sta jo sestavili zvezni ministrstvi za pravosodje in za kašmirske zadeve v Islamabadu) pakistanska vlada odstavi vsako izvoljeno vlado v Azadu Kašmirju ne glede na podporo, ki ko ima v zakonodajni skupščini province Azad Džamu in Kašmir, poleg tega ima islamski svet, kot drugod v Pakistanu, vrhovno zakonodajno oblast.
And in addition, under Section 56 of the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (which was drafted by the Federal Ministries of Law and Kashmir Affairs in Islamabad), the Pakistani government can dismiss any elected government in Azad Kashmir irrespective of the support it may enjoy in the AJK Legislative Assembly and, as throughout Pakistan, the national Islamic Council has over-riding authority over all legislation.
Gilgit in Baltistan
Gilgit and Baltistan
Ne glede na to, kako je stanje hudo v provinci Azad Džamu in Kašmir, je neskončno hujše v Gilgitu in Baltistanu, najsevernejšem delu Kašmirja, ki je pod pakistansko upravo in ki nima nobenega statusa ali česa, kar bi bilo vsaj podobno demokratičnemu predstavništvu.
Bad as the situation is in AJK, it is infinitely worse in Gilgit and Baltistan, the northernmost area of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, which enjoys no status or even the semblance of democratic representation.
Gilgit in Baltistan (ki jima Pakistan pravi Severna območja) sta pod pakistansko upravo.
Gilgit and Baltistan (referred to as the Northern Areas by Pakistan) is administered by Pakistan.
Glede na to, da Pakistan zatrjuje, da sta celotna Džamu in Kašmir sporno območje, formalno ni priključil Severnih območij.
As Pakistan maintains that the whole of Jammu and Kashmir is disputed territory, it has not formally incorporated the Northern Areas.
Tako ta predel ni provinca Pakistana in niti del province Azad Džamu in Kašmir.
As such, it is neither a province of Pakistan nor a part of AJK.
Svet Severnih območij, ki je bil ustanovljen pred časom in za katerega je bilo s ponosom razglašeno, da deluje kot "provincialna skupščina", v resnici prikriva popolno odsotnost ustavne identitete in državljanskih pravic.
The Northern Areas Council, set up some time ago, with the boast that it is functioning like a 'Provincial Assembly', screens, in reality, a total absence of constitutional identity or civil rights.
Prebivalstvo se ohranja v revščini, nepismenosti in zaostalosti.
The people are kept in poverty, illiteracy and backwardness.
Potres iz leta 2005, ki je bil že sam po sebi uničujoč, je še poslabšal te razmere.
The 2005 earthquake, disastrous in itself, exacerbated all the above.
Neodgovorno bi bilo ne opozoriti na to stanje ali poudariti krivice, ki se še vedno dogajajo, zato poročilo vztrajno poudarja potrebo, da Pakistan ponovno preuči koncept demokratične odgovornosti ter da reši vprašanje oskrbovanja s potrebščinami na območjih, ki so pod njegovim dejanskim nadzorom.
It would be wholly irresponsible not to draw attention to this situation or to highlight these continuing injustices, and the report therefore underlines forcefully the need for Pakistan to revisit its concept of democratic accountability and to address the needs provision issue in the areas under its (de facto) control.
Vprašanje plebiscita
The issue of a plebiscite
Poročilo jasno podpira mirovni proces med Pakistanom in Indijo, ki je v teku, kot edini način za napredek.
The report makes clear its support for the current peace process between Pakistan and India as the way forward.
Pakistan še dalje opozarja na zgodnje resolucije VSZN o Kašmirju, v podporo svoji zahtevi, da bi bilo treba razpisati plebiscit, da se ugotovi, ali naj se združeni Džamu in Kašmir "priključi" Indiji ali Pakistanu.
Pakistan continues to point to early UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir to support its contention that there should be a plebiscite to determine whether a reunited Jammu and Kashmir should "join" India or Pakistan.
Poročilo pa ugotavlja, da Pakistan ne izpolnjuje pogojev, ki so jih določili ZN za tak plebiscit, ter jih tudi nikoli več ne bo mogel izpolniti.
The report notes, however, that the UN-laid down conditions for such a plebiscite have not been, and can no longer be, met by Pakistan.
Situacija je od te točke že napredovala.
The situation has moved on.
Za zaključek, poročilo priznava starodavno in edinstveno dediščino Kašmircev in poročevalka jih lahko samo pohvali za njihovo vztrajnost.
In conclusion, the report recognises the ancient and unique heritage of the Kashmiri people, and the rapporteur has nothing but praise for their tenacity.
Po tolikih desetletjih konfliktov in tragedij v tem izjemno lepem in zgodovinskem predelu podceline, je spodbudno videti, da dve veliki sili, Indija in Pakistan, sodelujeta s prebivalci Kašmirja in da so mirne rešitve tako v fazi izvrševanja kot tudi še na vidiku, kar je znan proces, ki ga Evropski parlament v celoti podpira.
After so many decades of conflict and tragedy in this particularly beautiful and historic part of the sub-continent, it is heartening to see the two great powers, India and Pakistan, coming together with the peoples of Kashmir and that peaceful solutions are both on the horizon and being implemented, a familiar process which the European Parliament fully supports.
o prenosu znanja v prakso: široko zastavljena inovacijska strategija za EU
on Putting knowledge into practice: A broad-based innovation strategy for Europe
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................18
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS............18
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................21
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION 21
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................25
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT..................................25
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................29
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS......................................................29
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Prenos znanja v prakso: široko zastavljena inovacijska strategija za EU“ ( KOM(2006)0502 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled ‘Putting knowledge into practice: A broad-based innovation strategy for Europe’ ( COM(2006)0502 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Investiranje v raziskave: akcijski načrt za Evropo“ ( KOM(2003)0226 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled 'Investing in research: an action plan for Europe' ( COM(2006)0226 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Izvajanje lizbonskega programa Skupnosti „Več raziskav in inovacij – naložba za rast in zaposlovanje: skupni pristop“ ( KOM(2005)0488 ) ter ustreznih delovnih dokumentov Komisije ( SEC(2005)1253 in SEC(2005)1289 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on implementation of the Lisbon Strategy entitled ‘More research and innovation – investing for growth and employment: a common approach’ ( COM(2005)0488 ) and the relevant Commission working documents ( SEC(2005)1253 and SEC(2005)1289 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila neodvisne skupine strokovnjakov za raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije, ki je bila vzpostavljena po vrhu v Hampton Courtu, z naslovom „Ustvarjanje inovativne Evrope“ (Ahovo poročilo) iz januarja 2006,
– having regard to the January 2006 report of the independent group of experts on R&D and innovation, constituted after the Hampton Court summit, entitled ‘Creating an innovative Europe’ (Aho report),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva z zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Lizboni z dne 23. in 24. marca 2000, cilj katerega je bil iz Evrope narediti najbolj konkurenčno in dinamično, na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu, ter sklepov predsedstva z zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Bruslju z dne 22. in 23. marca 2005 ter 23. in 24. marca 2006,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000, which aimed to make Europe the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, and the Presidency conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 22 and 23 March 2005 and 23 and 24 March 2006,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Skupna prizadevanja za gospodarsko rast in nova delovna mesta – Nov začetek za Lizbonsko strategijo“ ( KOM(2005)0024 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Working together for growth and jobs – a new start for the Lisbon Strategy ( COM(2005)0024 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Skupni ukrepi za rast in zaposlovanje: Lizbonski program Skupnosti“ (KOM(2005) 0330),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled ‘Community actions for growth and employment: the Community Lisbon Programme’ ( COM(2005)0330 ),
– ob upoštevanju nacionalnih programov reform, ki so jih predstavile države članice, jesenskih poročil držav članic za leto 2006 o izvajanju njihovih nacionalnih programov reform
– having regard to the national reform programmes (NRPs) presented by the Member States, the Member States' autumn 2006 reports on the implementation of their National Reform Programmes
http://ec.europa.eu/growthandjobs/key/nrp2006_en.htm in ocene Komisije o izvajanju nacionalnih programov reform v njenem letnem poročilu o stanju ( KOM(2006)0816 ),
http://ec.europa.eu/growthandjobs/key/nrp2006_en.htm , and the assessment of the implementation of these NRPs by the Commission in its annual progress report ( COM(2006)0816 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta 2005/601/ES z dne 12. julija 2005 o širših smernicah ekonomskih politik držav članic in Skupnosti (2005–2008)
– having regard to Council Recommendation 2005/601/EC of 12 July 2005 on the broad guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and the Community (2005 to 2008)
28. in Sklepa Sveta 2005/600/ES z dne 12. julija 2005 o smernicah za politike zaposlovanja držav članic
28. and Council Decision 2005/600/EC of 12 July 2005 on Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
21. , ki skupaj predstavljajo „integrirane smernice za rast in zaposlovanje“,
21. , which together form the ‘Integrated guidelines for jobs and growth’,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 1982/2006/ES z dne 18. decembra 2006 o sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013)
– having regard to Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013)
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1639/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006, ki vzpostavlja Okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovacije (2007–2013)
– having regard to Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013)
– ob upoštevanju uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega tehnološkega inštituta ( KOM(2006)0604 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council establishing the European Institute of Technology ( COM(2006)0604 ),
– ob upoštevanju uredbe Sveta o patentu Skupnosti ( KOM(2000)0412 ) in besedila, ki ga je pregledalo predsedstvo
– having regard to the proposal for a Council Regulation on the Community patent ( COM(2000)0412 ), and the text revised by the Presidency
– ob upoštevanju okvira Skupnosti za državno pomoč za raziskave, razvoj in inovacije
– having regard to the Community framework for state aid for research and development and innovation
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/c_323/c_32320061230en00010026.pdf ter sporočila Komisije "Boljša uporaba davčnih olajšav za raziskave in razvoj" (KOM(2006)728),
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/c_323/c_32320061230en00010026.pdf , and the Commission Communication entitled 'Towards a more effective use of tax incentives in favour of R&D' ( COM(2006)0728 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije „Evropsko poročilo o konkurenčnosti za leto 2006“ in Sporočila Komisije „Gospodarske reforme in konkurenčnost: ključna sporočila Evropskega poročila o konkurenčnosti za leto 2006“ ( KOM(2006)0697 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working paper entitled ‘European Competitiveness Report 2006’ ( SEC(2006)1467 ) and the Commission Communication entitled ‘Economic reforms and competitiveness: Key messages from the European Competitiveness Report 2006’ ( COM(2006)0697 ),
– ob upoštevanju „Pregleda stanja na področju inovacij v Evropi 2006“, ki jasno kaže, da so Združene države Amerike in Japonska na tem področju pred EU,
– having regard to the ‘European innovation scoreboard 2006’, which clearly shows that the USA and Japan remain ahead of the EU in this field,
– ob upoštevanju letnega pregleda „OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2006“
– having regard to the OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2006
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. julija 2006 o izvajanju Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: „Več raziskav in inovacij – naložba za rast in zaposlovanje: skupni pristop“
– having regard to its resolution of 5 July 2006 on implementing the Community’s Lisbon Programme: more research and innovation – investing for growth and employment: a common approach
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA (2006) 0528. ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0528 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. oktobra 2006 o prihodnji evropski patentni politiki
– having regard to its resolution of 12 October 2006 on future patent policy in Europe
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0416 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0416 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. marca 2006 o prispevku k spomladanskemu zasedanju Evropskega sveta 2006 o lizbonski strategiji
– having regard to its resolution of 15 March 2006 on the input to the Spring 2006 European Council in relation to the Lisbon Strategy
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA (2006) 0092. ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0092 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila strokovne skupine iz julija 2004 „Izboljšanje institucij za prenos tehnologije iz znanosti v podjetja“,
– having regard to the report by the group of experts of July 2004 entitled ‘Improving institutions for the transfer of technology from science to enterprise’,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 8. novembra 2006 „Naložbe v znanje in inovacije“ (lizbonska strategija), informativno poročilo INT/325,
– having regard to the working document of the European Economic and Social Committee of 8 November 2006 entitled ‘Investment in knowledge and innovation’ (Lisbon Strategy), information report INT/325,
– ob upoštevanju pobude i2010, zlasti sporočila Komisije „Akcijski načrt za e-upravo i2010: pospeševanje e-uprave v Evropi za dobro vseh“ ( KOM(2006)0173 ),
– having regard to the i2010 initiative, and particularly the Commission communication entitled ‘i2010 e-government action plan – accelerating e-government in Europe for the benefit of all’ ( COM(2006)0173 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o inovacijah na področju storitev iz novembra 2006,
– having regard to the Commission working document on innovation in services of November 2006,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj „Prispevek prihodnje regionalne politike k inovativnim zmogljivostim EU“ (A6–0000/2007),
– having regard to the Committee on Regional Development's report entitled ‘The contributions of future regional policy to EU innovative capacity’ (A6-0000/2007),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter Odbor za pravne zadeve ( A6-0159/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Regional Development and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0159/2007 ),
A. ker je zaradi svetovne konkurence treba upoštevati stopnjo razvoja lizbonske strategije in torej pomen še obsežnejše inovacijske strategije,
A. having regard to the state of progress of the Lisbon Strategy and consequently the importance, in view of global competition, of an even more extensive innovation strategy,
B. ker je raznolikost preko inovacij ena od možnosti EU, da obvladuje izzive globalizacije,
B. whereas diversity through innovation is one of the paths open to the EU to meet the challenges of globalisation,
C. ker je treba povečati prenos rezultatov akademskih raziskav zlasti v mala in srednje velika podjetja ter razpoložljivost rezultatov raziskav, zlasti za inovacije s socialno razsežnostjo, in ker je treba preučiti geografsko koncentracijo inovacijskih platform za uporabo znanja in raznolikosti v različnih regijah EU,
C. whereas both the transfer of academic results, particularly to SMEs, and the availability of research results, especially for innovations with a social dimension, should be increased, and whereas the geographical concentration of innovation platforms should be addressed so that use can be made of the skills and diversity found in different EU regions,
D. ker obsežne zaloge specialističnih znanstvenih dognanj v raziskovalnih središčih Evropske unije niso dovolj izkoriščene,
D. whereas insufficient use is made of the vast reserves of specialist scientific knowledge in research centres in the European Union,
E. ker okolje na področju podpore inovacijam ni konkurenčno ter ne določa preglednih in pravičnih pogojev za vse udeležence, ki izvajajo inovativne dejavnosti, vključno z malimi inovativnimi podjetji in središči za tehnološke inovacije,
E. whereas the environment in the innovation support field is not competitive and lacks transparent and fair conditions for all players carrying on innovative activities, including small innovative companies and technological innovation centres,
F. ker običajen pristop k inovacijam, ki združuje tehnološke pobude in povpraševanje, ni zadosten in zahteva sočasno spodbujanje ugodnih tržnih pogojev, da se ustvari zakonodajno okolje, ki spodbuja inovacije,
F. whereas the conventional approach to driving innovation, combining "technological-push" and "demand-pull", is not in itself sufficient and requires the simultaneous promotion of favourable market conditions to create a regulatory environment that is conducive to innovation,
G. ker učinkovit notranji trg, ki ga spodbuja nova direktiva o storitvah, ustvarja ugodne razmere za inovacije s povečano konkurenco v večjem in bolj stabilnem gospodarskem prostoru, ki spodbuja večje naložbe in spodbuja mobilnost delavcev,
G. whereas a well-functioning internal market, supported by the new Services Directive, creates a favourable environment for innovation through increased competition in a larger and more stable economic area, attracting greater investment and encouraging the mobility of workers,
H. ker so na enotnem trgu še vedno ovire za prost pretok blaga, storitev in delovne sile, zaradi katerih se evropska podjetja ne morejo dovolj razširiti, da bi bile naložbe v raziskave in inovacije donosne,
H. whereas barriers that continue to hamper mobility of goods, services and the labour force persist in the single market, depriving European businesses of the scale necessary to capitalise on investments in research and innovation,
I. ker je poglavitni cilj inovacij okrepiti konkurenčnost Evropske unije in izboljšati kakovost življenja njenih državljanov,
I. whereas the main objective of innovation is to boost the EU’s competitiveness and give its citizens a better quality of life,
J. ker načelo odličnosti, ki je primerno predvsem pri podpori najbolj prednostnih znanstvenih raziskav, ovira zdravo konkurenčnost na področju podpore inovativnosti in iz programov pomoči izključuje manjše akterje (inovativna podjetja, tehnološka in inovacijska središča, raziskovalna središča),
J. whereas the principle of excellence, which is appropriate mainly in the support of top priority scientific research, hinders healthy competition in the area of innovation support and excludes smaller players (innovative companies, technological and innovation centres, research centres) from support programmes,
K. ker inovacije pomagajo tudi pri ohranjanju tradicionalnih sektorjev,
K. whereas innovation also makes it possible to maintain traditional sectors,
L. če upoštevamo vlogo inovacij pri oblikovanju socialnih modelov držav članic Evropske unije,
L. having regard to the role of innovation in devising social models in EU Member States,
M. ker inovacije lahko prispevajo k vključevanju družbenih skupin, kot so invalidi,
M. whereas innovation can contribute to the integration of social groups such as the disabled,
N. ker blago, storitve in postopki ponujajo premalo izkoriščen inovacijski potencial Evropske unije,
N. whereas goods, services and processes offer an underexploited innovation potential in the EU,
O. ker je zelo pomembna institucionalna podpora postopku za upravljanje znanja na področju inovacij in avtorskih pravic,
O. having regard to the importance of institutional support for the process of innovation and copyright knowledge management,
P. če upoštevamo financiranje inovacijske politike in čedalje večji pomen, ki ga daje javnim naročilom in javno-zasebnemu partnerstvu,
P. having regard to the funding of innovation policy and the increasingly important role of public procurement and public-private partnerships,
Q. ker je izobraževanje, vključno z interdisciplinarnim poučevanjem na področjih, ki zadevajo tradicionalna znanja, predpogoj za inovativnost in ker mora biti inovativnost sestavni del izobraževalnih programov na vseh ravneh poučevanja,
Q. whereas education, including interdisciplinary teaching covering areas that overlap traditional subjects is a precondition for innovation and innovation should be an integral part of education programmes at all levels of teaching,