natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V zadnjih desetih letih se je večina makroekonomskih kazalcev razvijala uspešno.
Most macroeconomic indicators developed successfully over the last decade.
Leta 2005 se je BDP povečal za 4,9 %, proračunski primanjkljaj v finančnem letu 2005/2006 je 0,6 %, medtem ko inflacija ostaja v obsegu uradne ciljne stopnje od 3–6 % ali pod njo.
GDP grew by 4.9% in 2005, budget deficit is at 0.6% (fiscal year 2005/2006), inflation remains inside or below the official target range of 3-6%.
Južnoafriška vlada glavne gospodarske in družbene probleme rešuje v okviru t.i. strategije za gospodarsko udejstvovanje temnopoltega prebivalstva (BEE) za odpravo neenakosti iz obdobja apartheida z večjim vključevanjem prikrajšanega prebivalstva v gospodarstvo, ter v okviru pobude za pospešeno in skupno rast Južne Afrike (ASGISA), katere cilj je povečanje gospodarske rasti na 6 % ter prepoloviti brezposelnost in revščino do leta 2014.
The South African government addresses the main economic and social problems in the black economic empowerment (BEE) strategy, which aims to redress apartheid-era inequities by increasing the economic participation by the disadvantaged population, and in the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (ASGISA) with the objective to lift economic growth to 6% and to halve employment and poverty by 2014.
Skupna pobuda za pridobivanje prednostnih kvalifikacij (Joint Initiative for Priority Skills Acquisition) se ukvarja s pomanjkanjem kvalificirane delovne sile v ključnih gospodarskih sektorjih.
The Joint Initiative for Priority Skills Acquisition addresses the lack of skilled workers in key economic sectors.
Zunanji gospodarski odnosi
External economic relations
Južna Afrika velja za gonilno gospodarsko silo podsaharske Afrike.
South Africa's economy is considered the motor for the economy of Sub-Saharan Africa.
Razvoj v Južni Afriki lahko vpliva na zmanjševanje revščine in doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja na regionalni ravni.
Developments in South Africa can have an effect on poverty alleviation and achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) on regional level.
Evropska unija je najpomembnejši trgovinski partner Južne Afrike.
The EU is the most important trading partner for South Africa.
V prvih sedmih mesecih leta 2005 je 42,9 % celotnega uvoza Južne Afrike izviralo iz EU in 37,6 % njenega celotnega izvoza je bilo namenjeno v EU.
In the first seven months of 2005, 42.9% of all South African imports came from the EU, and 37.6% of all exports went to the EU.
Leta 2005 so uvoženi izdelki iz Južne Afrike predstavljali zgolj 1,4 % delež na trgu EU, medtem ko je bilo v Južno Afriko izvoženo 1,7 % vseh izvoznih izdelkov EU.
Imports from South Africa had only a share of 1.4% on the EU market, in 2005, and 1.7% of all EU exports went to South Africa.
Zunanji gospodarski odnosi Južne Afrike potekajo v okviru kompleksne strukture: članstvo v STO, dvostranski Sporazum o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju z EU, članica skupine držav AKP kot podpisnica sporazuma iz Cotonouja, vendar ni upravičena do nevzajemnih trgovinskih preferencialov in ne prejema sredstev iz Evropskega razvojnega sklada.
South Africa's external economic relations are embedded in a complex framework: WTO membership, bilateral Trade, Development and Cooperation Agreement (TDCA) with the EU, member of the ACP group of states as signatory of the Cotonou Agreement, but not eligible for non-reciprocal trade preferences and not benefiting from funding through the European Development Fund (EDF).
Država se vključuje v politično sodelovanje in institucije AKP-EU ter Južnoafričani lahko sodelujejo v postopkih za izbiro javnih naročil v okviru Evropskega razvojnega sklada v vseh državah AKP.
The country is participating in political cooperation and the ACP-EU institutions and South Africans can participate in tendering procedures under the EDF in all ACP countries.
Južna Afrika sodeluje pri pogajanjih v okviru sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu s skupino "SADC-minus", ki je vključena v carinsko unijo s štirimi državami BLNS.
South Africa is involved in the negotiation of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPAs) with the "SADC-minus" group having a customs union with the four "BLNS" countries.
Vendar pa Južna Afrika z EU ne bo sklenila sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu za razvoj, temveč bodo njeni trgovinski odnosi z EU še naprej potekali v okviru STRS.
However, South Africa will not join the EPA; its trade relations with the EU will remain under the TDCA.
Prekrivanje sedanjih procesov regionalnega vključevanja znotraj južnoafriške regije (Južnoafriška razvojna skupnost (SADC), Južnoafriška carinska unija (SACU), Skupni trg za Vzhodno in Južno Afriko) s pogajanji v okviru sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu bi le zapletlo regionalno trgovinsko vključevanje regije.
The overlapping of current processes of regional integration within the Southern Africa region (SADC, SACU, Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa) with EPA negotiations is complicating the regional trade integration process of the region.
Sporazum o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju
Trade, Development and Cooperation Agreement
V sporazumu je predviden tudi redni politični dialog.
The agreement also provides for a regular political dialogue.
Sporazum vključuje tudi zagotovitev trajne finančne pomoči EU v okviru Evropskega programa za obnovo in razvoj v višini okrog 130 milijonov EUR na leto.
TDCA includes continued EU financial assistance under the European Programme for Reconstruction and Development amounting to about € 130 million annually.
Druga področja gospodarskega in trgovinskega sodelovanja so med drugim pravila o kumulaciji porekla, sodelovanje med carinskimi službami, konkurenčna politika, javna pomoč, varstvo pravic intelektualne lastnine, javna naročila, standardizacija, liberalizacija na področju storitev, statistika, promet, pospeševanje trgovinske izmenjave.
Other areas of economic and trade related cooperation are inter alia arrangements for cumulation of origin, cooperation between customs services, competition policy, public aid, protection of intellectual property rights, public procurement, standardisation, liberalisation in the field of services, statistic, transport, trade promotion.
Sodelovanje je predvideno tudi na področju industrije, spodbujanja naložb, telekomunikacij, informacijske družbe, energije, rudarstva, turizma, kmetijstva, ribištva, potrošniške politike in (finančnih) storitev.
Cooperation is also foreseen in the areas of industry, investment promotion, telecommunications, information society, energy, mining, tourism, agriculture, fisheries, consumer policy and (financial) services.
Obstajata tudi dva ločena dvostranska sporazuma o znanosti in tehnologiji ter o vinu in žganih pijačah.
Two separate bilateral agreements exist on Science and Technology and on Wine and Spirits.
Vpliv sporazuma o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju
Effects of the TDCA
Sporazum o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovaje je omogočil zmanjšanje razkoraka v trgovinski bilanci med EU in Južno Afriko.
The TDCA has enabled the EU to close the gap in the trade balance with South Africa.
Južnoafriške tarifne spremembe zadevajo 40 % izmenjanega blaga z obteženo povprečno tarifo 10%.
South African tariff changes affect 40% of currently traded goods in a context of a weighted average tariff of 10%.
Glede tarifnih prilagoditev v okviru sporazuma o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju je trenutno bolj obremenjena Južna Afrika, kar močno vpliva na zmožnost države za zbiranje prihodkov in s tem na njene investicijske zmožnosti v socialnem sektorju in na področju zdravstva.
The greater burden of the TDCA in terms of tariff adjustments currently falls on South Africa, with an significant impact on government revenue collection capacity and consequently on its investment capacity in the social sector and health care.
Stališče EU do kmetijstva in drugih občutljivih sektorjev Južne Afrike ter regionalnega razvoja je precej agresivno in se bo le še okrepilo glede na to, da so bila večstranska pogajanja v okviru kroga iz Dohe prekinjena, kar pa lahko ogrozi dosedanja prizadevanja na regionalni ravni za doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja.
EU positions on agriculture as well as other sensitive sectors for South Africa and regional development has been very aggressive, and they will be even more so now that multilateral negotiations under the WTO Doha round have been suspended, potentially compromising regional efforts already undertaken for the achievement of the MDGs.
Sektorji visoke tehnologije v Južni Afriki so pod čedalje večjim pritiskom zaradi uvoženih izdelkov iz EU, ki imajo primerjalno prednost, kar lahko povzroča težave za rastoče inovativne sektorje v Južni Afriki (farmacevtska in strojna industrija ter industrija transportnih vozil) in ogrozi regionalni razvoj strateških sektorjev, ki lahko na regionalni ravni prispevajo k izboljšanju standardov in doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja.
High technology sectors in SA face increased pressure from EU imports which have a comparative advantage, potentially creating difficulties for growing innovation sectors in South Africa (pharmaceuticals, machinery, transport vehicles) and harming the regional development of strategic sectors that could contribute regionally to the improvement of living standards and to reach the MDGs.
Obdobje izvajanja znižanja tarif iz sporazuma o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju (ki je preneseno na konec prehoda) je povezano z obdobjem izvajanja območja proste trgovine skupnosti SADC.
The implementation period of the TDCA tariff reductions (which are back-loaded) is linked to a similar time period of the implementation period of the SADC FTA.
Liberalizacija trgovine med članicami SADC na eni strani ter liberalizacija trgovine med Južno Afriko in EU na drugi poteka istočasno, zato bo težje preučiti vpliv območja proste trgovine SADC in sporazuma o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju.
Liberalisation between SADC members and at the same time South Africa with the EU, will reduce the ability to analyse the impact of the SADC FTA and the TDCA.
Sporazum o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju mora podpirati vključevanje skupnosti SADC, pri tem pa ne sme ogroziti sposobnosti držav SADC, da si postavijo vprašanja o južnoafriškem procesu in ga vodijo.
The TDCA should support SADC integration without compromising the ability of SADC members to interrogate and manage their Southern African process.
Omejitve glede pravil o poreklu v zakonu o rasti in potencialu Afrike ( Africa Growth and Opportunities Act ) so manj stroge v primerjavi s tistimi iz sporazuma o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju.
Comparatively, the Africa Growth and Opportunities Act has less stringent limitations on Rules of Origin than the TDCA.
Omejevalna pravila o poreklu v sporazumu o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju zmanjšujejo sposobnost južnoafriških držav za uporabo visokotehnološke zmogljivosti v Južni Afriki, s čimer bi se povečalo bogatenje njihovih proizvodov za izvoz v EU.
The restrictive rules of origin in the TDCA reduce the ability of Southern African countries to use the higher technology capacity in South Africa to increase beneficiation of their products for export to the EU.
Ohlapnejša pravila o poreklu lahko spodbujajo pozitivne obojestranske vezi med gospodarstvom Južne Afrike in južnoafriških držav.
Generous rules of origin can promote positive forward and backward linkages between the South African and the Southern African countries' economies.
Strateško partnerstvo in skupni akcijski načrt EU-Južna Afrika
EU-SA Strategic Partnership and Joint Action Plan
Komisija je 28. junija 2006 predlagala strateško partnerstvo EU-Južna Afrika, ki se bo začelo izvajati s skupnim akcijskim načrtom, ki ga bo novembra 2006 predlagal Svet za sodelovanje EU-Južna Afrika.
On 28 June 2006, the Commission proposed the EU-South Africa Strategic Partnership which shall be implemented with a Joint Action Plan to be proposed to the EU-South Africa Cooperation Council in November 2006.
Osnovna zamisel je vzpostavitev političnega dialoga, pri čemer Evropska unija in Južna Afrika določita skupna politična stališča o zadevah skupnega interesa, ki bi bil podlaga za oblikovanje skupnega ukrepa bodisi na regionalni ali svetovni ravni, t.j. skupnih ukrepov v Afriki (ohranjanje miru, posredovanje, Novo partnerstvo za afriški razvoj (NEPAD), Afriška unija itd.) ali na svetovni ravni, npr. v okviru Združenih narodov ali Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (migracije, okoljske zadeve, podnebne spremembe itd.).
A central idea is to develop the political dialogue in a way that the EU and South Africa identify common political positions on subjects of mutual interest which would then lead to joint action on a regional or global level, i.e. joint actions in Africa (peace keeping, mediation, NEPAD, African Union etc.) or on a global level (i.e. in the UN or WTO, concerning migration, environmental issues, climate change etc.).
Na ravni južnoafriške regije so predlagani skupni ukrepi glede pandemije AIDS-a, krize v Zimbabveju in regionalnega vključevanja.
On the level of the Southern African region, joint actions are suggested concerning the AIDS pandemic, the Zimbabwe crisis and regional integration.
Poglavitni element strategije je revizija sporazuma o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju.
The revision of the TDCA is a core element of the Strategy.
Komisija med drugim predlaga, da se v sporazum vključijo naslednji elementi:
The Commission proposes inter alia the following elements for a revised TDCA:
§ upoštevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja;
§ reference to the MDGs
§ pravno zavezujoče obveznosti, da bo STRS v skladu s sporazumom iz Cotonouja (širjenje orožja za množično uničenje, boj proti terorizmu, boj proti nekaznovanju, podpiranje Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, preprečevanje dejavnosti najemniških vojsk);
§ legally binding commitments to bring the TDCA in line with the Cotonou Agreement (proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, fight against terrorism, fight against impunity, support for the International Criminal Court, prevention of mercenary activities)
§ okrepljen politični dialog v skladu z revizijo sporazuma iz Cotonouja;
§ enhanced political dialogue in line with the revision of Cotonou
§ nadaljnje določbe o liberalizaciji trgovine;
§ further provisions on the liberalisation of trade
§ zavezujoče obveznosti na področju storitev, naložbenih dejavnosti, javnih naročil, intelektualne lastnine, konkurence, standardizacije in ugotavljanja skladnosti, carine, pravil o poreklu;
§ binding commitments in areas such as services, investment, government procurement, intellectual property, competition, standardisation and conformity assessment, customs, rules of origin
§ okrepitev določb na področjih, kot so pravosodje, svoboda in varnost, pranje denarja, prepovedane droge in migracije, socialne zadeve (zaposlovanje, enakost med spoloma v delovni zakonodaji), programi za izmenjavo mladih, kulturno sodelovanje.
§ strengthen the provisions in areas such as justice, freedom and security, money laundering, drugs and migration, social issues (employment, gender equality labour law), Youth exchange programmes, cultural cooperation.
Kratka ocena strateškega partnerstva in skupnega akcijskega načrta
Short assessment of Strategic Partnership and Joint Action Plan
Strateško partnerstvo ne upošteva pomembnega razvoja in družbenega vpliva, ki ga ima lahko prekrivanje revizije STRS in pogajanji o sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu ne le na Južno Afriko, temveč zlasti na države BLNS (Botsvana, Lesoto, Namibija in Svazi) in druge najmanj razvite države v regiji.
The Strategic Partnership fails to recognise the important development and social impact of overlapping between TDCA revision and EPA negotiations is likely to have on South Africa, but especially on the BLNS countries and on the other Least Development Countries of the region.
Za Južno Afriko je še posebej problematična vključitev obveznosti o "singapurskih vprašanjih" v sporazum o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju.
The inclusion of commitments on the so-called “Singapore Issues” in the TDCA is particularly problematic for South Africa.
Kljub pritisku EU Svetovna trgovinska organizacija že dolgo časa nasprotuje sporazumom o javnih naročilih in investicijah, kar je deloma razlog za zastoj pogajanj o prosti trgovini med državami SACU in Združenimi državami Amerike.
Despite EU pressure, government procurement and investment agreements have been long resisted at the WTO and are, in part, the reason for the impasse in the SACU-US free trade negotiations.
Čeprav ima Južna Afrika v okviru pogajanj o teh vprašanjih boljši položaj v primerjavi z ostalimi državami SACU, morajo pogajanja potekati na podlagi politike, osnovane na dokazih.
While South Africa may be in a better position to negotiate these issues, compared to other SACU countries, this needs to be done on the basis of evidence-based policymaking.
Revizija sporazuma o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju ne sme zahtevati nadaljnjega sodelovanja zasebnega sektorja pri zagotavljanju osnovnih storitev.
TDCA revision should not push for further participation of the private sector in the provision of basic services.
Južna Afrika je sprejela obsežne obveznosti na področju storitev v okviru Splošnega sporazuma o trgovini s storitvami (GATS) in se že sooča s strogimi omejitvami pri doseganju sprejemljivih ravni dostopa in splošnih storitev.
On services, South Africa has made extensive commitments under GATS and already faces severe constraints in achieving acceptable levels of access and universal service.
Na področju investicij je Južna Afrika podpisala dvostranske investicijske pogodbe, ki številnim državam članicam EU že zagotavljajo zaščito.
On investment, South Africa has signed many bilateral investment treaties that already grant protection to a number of EU member states.
Rezultati spodbujanja javnih/zasebnih partnerstev na področju osnovnih storitev so bili različni in s pogosto negativnimi vplivi na revne prebivalce v sektorjih, kot sta oskrba z vodo in javna higiena.
The promotion of Public/Private partnerships in essential services has yielded mixed results and often has had negative impacts on the poor in sectors such as water and sanitation.
V okviru strateškega partnerstva je treba prednost nameniti prošnjam za tehnično pomoč na strateških področjih za uresničitev razvojnih ciljev države, ki lahko hkrati pripomorejo k družbenemu in gospodarskemu razvoju južnoafriške regije kot celote.
The Strategic Partnership should prioritise demands for technical assistance in areas strategic to reach the development objectives of the country that could as well contribute to the social and economic development of the Southern African region as a whole.
Tehnične zmogljivosti Južne Afrike je treba podpreti z dodatnim razvijanjem zmogljivosti, nudenjem tehnične pomoči in sporazumi o vzajemnem priznavanju na področju varne hrane, sanitarnih in fitosanitarnih ukrepov.
South Africa's technical capacity should be harnessed with more capacity building, technical assistance, equivalence and mutual recognition agreements on food safety, sanitary and phytosanitary measures.
V zvezi s tem je treba predvideti tudi mehanizme za zagotovitev podpore izvoza drugih sosednjih držav znotraj južnoafriške regije.
Mechanisms should be considered to assist other neighbouring countries' exports within the region in this regard.
Strateško partnerstvo ne predlaga zanesljive strategije za energetsko varnost, ki bi upoštevala podnebne spremembe ter njihov družbeni in okoljski vpliv na najrevnejše prebivalstvo Južne Afrike in drugih najmanj razvitih držav v regiji.
The Strategic Partnership fails to propose a sound energy security strategy that takes into account climate change and its social and environmental impact on the poorest in South Africa and other LDCs in the region.
Trajnostna strategija za energetsko varnost, ki temelji na varstvu okolja in doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, mora spodbujati razvoj obnovljivih virov energije, kot so sončna energija, vetrna energija in biomasa, ter energetskih virov z majhnim vplivom na okolje, kot so male hidroelektrarne.
A sustainable energy security strategy, based on the protection of the environment and the achievement of the MDGs, should foster the development of renewable sources of energy, such as solar energy, wind power and biomass and low impact sources of energy such as small-scale hydropower plants.
Od teh pobud morajo imeti korist najrevnejši prebivalci, ki večinoma živijo v oddaljenih podeželskih delih regije.
These should benefit the poorest sectors of society which mainly live in rural off-grid areas in the region.
V podporo temu cilju je treba iz proračuna EU zagotoviti sredstva za omogočanje prehoda iz trenutne odvisnosti od ekstraktivnega sektorja k bolj trajnostni nacionalni in regionalni energetski strategiji.
To support this objective the EU budget should provide appropriations to assist transition from the current dependency on the extractive sector to a more sustainable national and regional energy strategy.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 104/2000 o skupni ureditvi trgov za ribiške proizvode in proizvode iz ribogojstva
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0233 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0233 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6­0202/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0202/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0311/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0311/2006 ),
Novi Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS), ustanovljen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike, bo s 16. oktobrom 2006 zamenjal jamstveni oddelek Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) v skladu s členom 3(2) navedene uredbe.
The new European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy will replace the EAGGF Guarantee Section from 16 October 2006 in accordance with Article 3(2) of that Regulation.
EKJS bo financiral ukrepe v zvezi z ribiškimi trgi.
The EAGF will finance measures relating to fisheries markets.
Doslej je Komisija proračun, povezan z omenjenimi odhodki, izvajala v okviru skupnega upravljanja z državami članicami.
Up to now the Commission has implemented the budget related to this expenditure by shared management with the Member States.
Pravzaprav se odhodke, namenjene za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 104/2000 o skupni ureditvi trgov za ribiške proizvode in proizvode iz ribogojstva, financira iz jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS), ustanovljenega z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1258/1999 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike.
The expenditure incurred in the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products has been financed by the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy.
Ti odhodki so sledeči:
This expenditure comprises:
- pomoč združenjem proizvajalcev za kritje stroškov operativnih programov ribiške sezone;
- aid to producers' organisations to offset costs linked to operational programmes for the fishing year;
- finančna nadomestila za prenehanje dejavnosti;
- financial compensation for withdrawal;
- pomoč za prenos;
- carry-over aid;
- prenehanje dejavnosti in samostojen prenos dejavnosti s strani združenj proizvajalcev;
- autonomous withdrawal and carry-over by producers' organisations;
- pomoč za zasebno skladiščenje;
- aid for private storage;
- nadomestila proizvajalcem za tune, namenjene za predelovalno industrijo.
- allowances for producers for tuna destined for the processing industry.