natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1. da se izboljša trenutni postopek posredovanja zaupnih informacij in se zagotovi, da se Evropskemu parlamentu pošljejo vse informacije, ki so na voljo o boju proti mednarodnemu terorizmu, in da informacije, ki jih morajo na notranjem področju vlade držav članic prenesti nacionalnim parlamentom ali mednarodnim organizacijam, katerih članice so, v nobenem primeru ne bi bile zadržane;
1. to be reviewed and brought up-to-date in order to improve the current classified information transmission system and to guarantee the transmission to the European Parliament of all available information relating to the fight against international terrorism, ensuring that under no circumstances it be denied information, which, in the internal sphere, has been or should be transmitted to national parliaments by the respective governments of the Member States or the international organisations of which they form part;
39. poziva, da se poročila, ki jih za Svet pripravi služba SitCen, prav tako redno predložijo Evropskemu parlamentu, če to zahtevajo določbe zadevnega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma;
Asks for the reports drawn up by the Situation Centre (SitCen) for the Council of the Union to be transmitted regularly to the European Parliament, if necessary pursuant to the modalities provided for in the abovementioned Interinstitutional Agreement;
42. ponovno prosi Svet, naj Parlament obvešča o rednem posodabljanju skupnega stališča Sveta 2001/931/SZVP z dne 27. decembra 2001 o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu
Calls on the Council anew to inform Parliament on the regular updating of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism
44. pooblasti predsednika, da to resolucijo posreduje Evropskemu svetu, Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Svetu Evrope ter Organizaciji združenih narodov in njenim specializiranim agencijam.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Council, the Council, the Commission, the Governments and Parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the United Nations Organisation and its specialised agencies.
V boju proti terorizmu bomo lahko zmagali samo na področju vrednot – v nasprotnem primeru bomo poraženi.
The fight against terrorism will be won in the field of values, or not at all.
Mednarodni terorizem je dandanes največji izziv za splošne državljanske vrednote, največja nevarnost za mir in stabilnost odprtih družb ter najhujša grožnja svobodi, varnosti in človekovemu dostojanstvu.
International terrorism is today the most dangerous challenge to universal public values, the greatest threat to the peace and security of open societies, and the gravest menace to freedom, security and human dignity.
V nasprotju z desetletji pred padcem železne zavese dandanes nismo soočeni s prepoznavnim in odkritim sovražnikom z določenega geografskega območja, za katerega bi lahko vzpostavili jasna pravila in obrambo in s katerim bi lahko komunicirali.
However, unlike in the decades prior to the fall of the iron curtain, we no longer face a known and recognisable enemy with a precise geographical location, against whom clear rules and defences can be established and with whom channels of communication can be kept open.
Dandanašnji sovražnik je neviden, neopredeljen in razkropljen, saj ne prihaja iz točno določenih držav, čeprav so nekatere bolj sumljive kot druge, navzoč je povsod, tako zunaj kot znotraj naših meja, a ima kljub temu konvencionalno orožje, je vzpostavil redne vire financiranja, ima ali lahko pridobi orožje za množično uničevanje ter je sposoben ustvariti vsesplošen preplah, ki nas bo povsem ohromil.
Now, the enemy is invisible, frequently indeterminate and diffuse in nature, not clearly from any particular State, although some may fall under suspicion, omnipresent, whether beyond or within our frontiers, yet having conventional weapons and irregular funding, possessing or able to obtain weapons of mass destruction and capable of creating total panic and paralysis.
To je še dodaten razlog, da mora biti strategija boja proti terorizmu celovita, multilateralna in utemeljena na sistemu Združenih narodov.
This is a further reason why the counter-terrorist strategy must be global, multilateral and based on the United Nations system.
Vsak enostranski odgovor, ki ni v skladu z mednarodnim pravom, je obsojen na propad, naj bo država, ki ga izvede, še tako močna.
Any unilateral response, falling outside international law, is condemned to failure, however powerful the country responsible.
V okviru protiteroristične strategije je še posebej pomembno, da je skupna zunanja in varnostna politika EU skladna z načelom učinkovitega multilateralizma in spoštovanja Organizacije združenih narodov.
Under the counter-terrorism strategy, it is particularly important for the EU's common foreign and security policy (CFSP) to comply with the principle of effective multilateralism and respect for the UN.
Mednarodna skupnost se še ni dogovorila o definiciji terorizma, ki bi bila sprejemljiva za vse, obstaja pa soglasje, da je treba razlikovati med pravico do odpora proti okupaciji oziroma oboroženega osvobodilnega boja proti tiraniji in terorizmom kot takim.
The international community has failed to agree on a definition of terrorism accepted by all, yet there is agreement that a distinction should be drawn between resistance to occupation, or an armed struggle for freedom from tyranny, and terrorism as such.
Terorizma ni mogoče upravičiti v nobenem primeru.
There is no justification for terrorism.
Prav tako ni treba razpravljati o tem, ali je mogoče države obtožiti terorizma, saj je načrtna uporaba državnih oboroženih sil proti civilnemu prebivalstvu v mednarodnem pravu jasno prepovedana.
Nor is there any need to discuss whether States may or may not be guilty of terrorism, since the deliberate use by States of armed forces against the civilian population is already clearly prohibited under international law.
Terorizem je v vsakem primeru nesprejemljiv in noben razlog ni dovolj tehten, da bi ga lahko upravičil.
In any event, terrorism is always unacceptable and no cause can be invoked that would justify it.
Prav zato, ker teroristi napadajo in skušajo uničiti temelje in glavne vrednote mednarodne skupnosti, ki jih utelešajo in varujejo Združeni narodi, je treba v boju proti terorizmu brezpogojno spoštovati človekove pravice in pravno državo.
It is precisely because terrorism attacks and seeks to destroy the very foundations and basic values of the international community upheld by the United Nations that we must always respect human rights and the principles of the rule of law when we seek to combat it.
Spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in svoboščin ni le determinanta, temveč tudi razlog našega boja.
Respect for fundamental rights and freedoms is not merely a parameter of this struggle but its raison d'etre .
Kadar so bile te vrednote v imenu boja proti terorizmu kršene, sta bila diskurz in filozofija protiterorizma oslabljena in sta izgubila moralno veljavo, kar je opogumilo zaveznike in podpornike teroristov ter slednjim olajšalo novačenje pripadnikov.
Whenever these values have been breached in the name of the fight against terrorism, the thinking and philosophy underlying that struggle have been undermined and have lost their force and moral authority, emboldening the allies and sympathisers of terrorists, making it easier for them to recruit to their cause.
Omejevanje temeljnih pravic v javnosti ne ustvari občutka varnosti, temveč sproži še večji strah.
Restricting basic rights does not produce a greater sense of security among the public, but rather one of fear.
Strah pa hromi voljo, odločnost in ustvarjalnost.
And fear paralyses the will to act, intimidates and unmans.
Hočemo svobodno in samozavestno družbo z vsemi pravicami, ki se je odločena na zakonit način boriti proti terorizmu.
We need free societies, sure of themselves, with full rights and determined to defeat terrorism by means of the law.
Strah spodkopava temelje naše družbe.
Fear destroys the foundations of this society.
Družba, ki živi v strahu, pa je bitko izgubila, še preden se je začela.
A fearful society has lost the battle beforehand.
Razumu sile se je treba upreti s silo razuma, je odločno dejal pisatelj Juan Goytisolo.
As the writer Juan Goytisolo rightly said, 'the reason of force must be combated by the force of reason'.
S terorizmom se je mogoče boriti s pametjo, nepopustljivostjo in vztrajnostjo, z ustrezno kombinacijo preventivnih in represivnih ukrepov.
Terrorism must be fought with intelligence, tenacity and perseverance, through a suitable combination of preventive and repressive measures.
Najprej je treba nujno izboljšati informacijske in obveščevalne službe vseh držav Evropske unije ter poskrbeti za boljše usklajevanje in sodelovanje, tako medsebojno kot s sorodnimi organi tretjih držav, še zlasti ZDA.
First and foremost it is vital to strengthen the information and intelligence services of all EU countries, and for them to cooperate and coordinate their efforts more closely among themselves and with their counterparts in third countries, especially the United States.
Teroristična napada 11. septembra in 11. marca kažeta, da je treba nameniti več pozornosti „spečim“ terorističnim skupinam in celicam ter si ustrezno razlagati poročila o njihovih dejavnostih, sicer ne bo mogoče preprečiti novih napadov.
The experience of 11 September and 11 March has shown that we need to examine more closely and know how to interpret properly reports on 'dormant' terrorist groups and cells, in order to prevent attacks.
Evropska unija se mora zavedati, da omenjene službe potrebujejo tako materialna sredstva kot človeške vire, da se bodo lahko specializirale in postale bolj profesionalne – v tem poročilu obravnavamo prav to vprašanje in predlagamo ustrezne ukrepe.
The EU must be aware that these services need to be given the material and human resources to develop their specialist skills and professionalism, and this is an issue addressed in this report, which puts forward relevant measures.
Toda tako preventivne kot represivne ukrepe policije in pravosodnih organov mora javnost podpirati.
Yet both preventive measures and police and judicial measures to combat terrorism need to enjoy active public support.
Ozaveščanje in aktiviranje prebivalstva je bilo ključnega pomena pri uničenju nekaterih terorističnih gibanj, in sicer najprej pri njihovem moralnem porazu in izgubi ugleda, nato pa še političnem porazu, ki je privedel do njihovega razpada.
Raising the awareness of and mobilising the population have proved to be crucial in defeating some terrorist movements, first morally, by undermining their prestige, and then politically, leading to their break up.
V evropskih državah, ki so bile žrtve terorističnih napadov, je ta javna zavest večja, vendar se je izoblikovala šele z leti.
This awareness is greater in those European countries which have suffered the scourge of terrorism, but it took many years for this to happen.
Zdaj se mora razširiti še v države, ki niso bile neposredna tarča teroristov, saj se morajo zavedati, da teroristična nevarnost grozi vsemu svetu.
This mentality needs to spread to countries which have not been direct victims of terrorism, to convince them that the threat is global and the danger concerns us all.
Evropska unija si mora pri zunanjem delovanju prizadevati za to, da bi v zvezi z bojem proti terorizmu ozavestila tretje države, ne le njihovih vodij, temveč tudi državljane.
As part of its external action, the European Union must also seek to raise awareness in third countries with regard to the fight against terrorism, not just their leaders, but also their people.
Ne soočamo se namreč z religijo oziroma vero, temveč s posameznimi fanatiki, skrajneži in dogmatiki.
We are not up against a religion or a belief, but with people who are fanatical, extremist and dogmatic.
Spoštujemo vse filozofije in religije, vendar bomo pred njimi branili neodvisnost posameznika, družbe in države.
We respect all religions and philosophies, but we are defending the independence of individuals, society and the state vis-à-vis any religion.
Ko govorimo o mednarodnem terorizmu, imamo v mislih predvsem dejavnosti teroristov, ki se opredeljujejo za muslimane in trdijo, da delujejo v imenu boga in branijo islam.
When we speak of international terrorism, we are thinking in particular of the activities of terrorists who consider themselves to be Muslims and claim to act on behalf of God and in defence of Islam.
Vseeno bi se zelo motili, če bi menili, da vsi muslimani oziroma njihova večina podpirajo ta fanatizem in želijo postati teroristi.
Yet it would be a very grave mistake to imagine that Muslims as a whole, or in significant numbers, embrace this fanaticism or wish to become terrorists.
Islam je spoštovanja vredna in spoštovana svetovna religija z več kot 1,3 milijarde vernikov, ki živijo, delajo in molijo v miru.
Islam is a respectable and respected religion with 300 000 million adherents worldwide, who live work and pray in peace.
Zahod je prepričan, da so se najhujši teroristični napadi zgodili v ZDA in Evropi, kar pa ne drži – večina se jih je zgodila v muslimanskih državah, kjer so povzročili tudi največ smrtnih žrtev in prizadeli muslimanske državljane.
In the West, moreover, there is a tendency to think that the worst terrorist attacks have occurred in the United States or Europe , yet most of the major attacks and most of the mortal victims of international terrorism have been in Muslim countries or have affected Muslim citizens.
Zaradi tega moramo preprečiti nastanek islamofobije in se boriti proti njej.
Hence the need to prevent and combat any outbreaks of islamophobia.
Oznake, kot je „os zla“, manihejsko načelo dobrega in zla ter rek, da je „bog z nami“, samo podpihujejo skrajneže vseh vrst in ogrožajo boj proti terorizmu.
Expressions such as the 'axis of evil', Manichean concepts of 'good and evil' or the conviction that 'God is with us' only serve to encourage extremists of every kind and result in the failure of the fight against terrorism.
V tem je tudi pomen zavezništva civilizacij, ki sta ga osnovala predsednika vlad Španije in Turčije in ki so ga sprejeli tudi Združeni narodi, še zlasti generalni sekretar Kofi Anan, dandanes pa ga podpirajo številne države po vsem svetu.
Here lies the significance of the Alliance of Civilisations launched by the prime ministers of Spain and Turkey, which has been endorsed by the United Nations and its Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, and is now supported by numerous other countries worldwide.
Nekateri mu pravijo tudi zavezništvo vrednot ali kulture, toda njegov namen ostaja enak – upreti se tako imenovanemu spopadu civilizacij, spodbujati dialog, sožitje, razumevanje in strpnost med različnimi narodi in verami, pa tudi srečanja in izmenjavo na vseh ravneh, da bo mogoče nasilneže izločiti in jim preprečiti, da bi bila njihova beseda naletela na plodna tla.
Others prefer to speak of an alliance of values or cultures, but the meaning is the same - to oppose the so-called 'clash of civilisations' and uphold dialogue, co-existence, understanding and tolerance among different peoples and creeds.
S terorizmom in dejavnostmi, ki ga omogočajo, se je treba spopasti odločno in storilce kaznovati v skladu z zakonom.
To encourage encounters, exchanges and meetings at all levels so as to isolate the advocates of violence and ensure that ground is not ceded to their arguments.
Hkrati je treba onemogočiti razmere, v katerih se terorizem razvija in raste, ter dejavnike, ki naj bi bili po nekaterih razlagah razlog zanj.
Terrorism and the preparations for terrorism must be met with firm resistance and its perpetrators must be punished under the law.
Lokalni spori, kot je palestinsko-izraelski, so trn v peti mednarodne skupnosti, še zlasti pa islamskega sveta, enako velja za nepretrgano nasilje v Iraku, odkar se je začela invazija, in za konflikte v Čečeniji.
Endemic conflicts, such as that between Palestinians and Israelis, are a thorn in the side of the international community and, more especially, of the Islamic world, as are the ongoing violence in Iraq since the invasion or the conflict in Chechnya.
Milijoni mladih muslimanov, tudi v osrčju držav Evropske unije, se počutijo odrinjene in izključene, čeprav so obdani z bogastvom, in živijo brez upanja v prihodnost, zaradi tega lahko hitro postanejo tarče „osvobajajoče in transcendentne“ doktrine džihada, ki jim obljublja večno srečo v onostranstvu (čeprav ima beseda „džihad“ v islamu več pomenov in ne označuje nujno vojne, svete vojne ali nasilja).
Millions of young Muslims, including those within the countries of the European Union, feel excluded and marginalised, yet surrounded by wealth near at hand, and live with no hope for the future, making them easy targets for the 'liberating and transcendent' doctrine of jihadism, which offers them a happy and eternal life in the hereafter (although the work 'jihad' has various meanings in Islam and does not necessarily imply war or holy war, or violence).
Evropska unija mora vložiti več truda in sredstev v oblikovanje politike, ki bo tem mladim ponudila mesto v družbi in prihodnost.
The European Union must devote more concern and resources to forging a policy that will offer a place and a future to these young people.
Nekateri so prepričani, da je previden pristop, temelječ na dialogu, samo pretveza za strahopetnost in znamenje predaje.
There are some who believe that an approach based on dialogue and caution is tantamount to cowardice and is a prelude to surrender.
Prav nasprotno, je znamenje trdnosti, odločnosti, odkritosti in moralnega poguma.
On the contrary, it is indicative of firmness, straightforwardness and moral courage.
Dejstva namreč kažejo, da uporaba „bojevitega“ jezika (vojna proti terorizmu) vedno razvname muslimanske množice, spodbudi napade na zahodna veleposlaništva ter sproži sovraštvo in nasilje nad evropskimi državljani.
Facts are stubborn and show that, whenever war-like language is used ('total war on terror'), the result is to inflame the Muslim masses, triggering attacks on Western embassies and violence against European citizens of a highly virulent nature.
Prav zaradi občutka, da se sprehajamo po vulkanu, ki utegne vsak hip izbruhniti z nepredvidljivimi posledicami, bi morali biti še toliko previdnejši in razumnejši v svojih besedah in dejanjih.
It is this very awareness that we are treading on a volcano with unpredictable consequences that should prompt us to be sensible and cautious in how we think and speak.
Ni treba posebej poudarjati, da so omenjeni odzivi v muslimanskem svetu vedno pretirani in nerazumni, vendar so še dodaten razlog za previdno ravnanje.
Needless to say, such reactions are always disproportionate and irrational, yet they are a further reason to insist on the need for caution.
Aretacije in sojenje posameznikom in terorističnim skupinam v primerih, kjer obstajajo trdni dokazi krivde, med muslimani ne sprožijo sovražnih reakcij, do kakršnih pride, če se jim zazdi, da je islam predmet omalovaževanja ali demonizacije v političnih govorih ali novinarskih člankih.
The arrest and trial of individuals or terrorist cells in cases where evidence of guilt is available do not prompt virulent reactions in the Muslim world, in the way that happens when there is a perception that Islam is being demonised or disparaged in politicians' speeches or media reports.
Brezpogojno moramo braniti svobodo izražanja, ki je temeljni kamen svobodne in odprte družbe, ter se upreti vsem represivnim ukrepom oblasti zoper medije.
We unreservedly support freedom of expression as the cornerstone of free and open societies and we oppose any repressive measures against communications media by the public authorities.
Ne zagovarjamo avtocenzure, menimo pa, da je treba svobodo izražanja uživati in uveljavljati odgovorno in razumno.
We do not advocate self-censorship, but believe that freedom of expression must be exercised responsibly and sensibly by those who enjoy it every day.
• opozarja, da Evropska unija nima posebne strategije boja proti terorizmu, ki bi se razlikovala od vojne proti terorizmu, in znova poudarja, da bi morala ta strategija nujno „temeljiti na brezpogojnem spoštovanju človekovih pravic in načel pravne države“;
• points out that the European Union has no strategy for combating terrorism that differs from the war on terror; reaffirms that it "should be firmly based on the unconditional respect of human rights and of the principles underlying states governed by the rule of law";
• opozarja, da Evropska unija terorizma ni jasno opredelila; državni terorizem v opredelitev ni vključen, prav tako ni razlikovanja med teroristi in političnimi gibanji;
• points out that the European Union is lacking a clear definition of terrorism; state terrorism is not included neither the differentiation between terrorists and political movements;
• ugotavlja, da so v poročilu zanemarjeni glavni vzroki terorizma, ki so predvsem gospodarski in socialni;
• notes that the report does not address the root causes of terrorism which are mainly economic and social ones;
• meni, da so se zaradi obstoječe strategije boja proti terorizmu mednarodne varnostne razmere poslabšale, na primer v Iraku in Afganistanu;
• notes that the current strategy to fight terrorism has worsened the international security situation; Iraq and Afghanistan are two examples;
• z obžalovanjem ugotavlja, da je v trenutnem boju proti terorizmu (to velja zlasti za „vojno proti terorizmu“) vojna znova postala sredstvo mednarodne politike, ki ogroža našo civilizacijo in demokratične dosežke;
• notices with regret that in the course of the current fight against terrorism - in particular "the war on terror" - war has been rehabilitated as a means of international politics which threatens our civilisation and democratic achievements;
• obsoja dejstvo, da obstoječa strategija boja proti terorizmu pospešuje militarizacijo notranje in zunanje politike EU na škodo človekovih pravic;
• criticises that the current strategy to fight terrorism is accelerating the militarization of internal and external affairs of the EU in the expense of human rights;
• zahteva konec vojne proti terorizmu in polno spoštovanje človekovih pravic.
• demands an end of the "war on terror" and the establishment of the full respect of human rights.
Odbor za razvoj poziva Odbor za zunanje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Opredelitev terorizma
Definition of terrorism
4. poziva EU, naj svoje delovanje, povezano z bojem proti terorizmu, utemelji na podrobnih, preglednih in redno posodobljenih analizah dejanskih groženj za državljane severne in južne poloble, še posebej zato, da se državljanom omogoči previdnost glede morebitnih oblik manipuliranja z informacijami ter da se razvija in izvaja sorazmerne odzive na prepoznane grožnje;
Calls on the EU to base its action in connection with the fight against terrorism on detailed, transparent and regularly updated analyses of the threat actually posed to citizens of the northern and southern hemispheres, in order in particular to enable citizens to be on their guard against any form of manipulation of information, and to develop and implement proportionate responses to the threat identified;
6. meni, da se strategija boja proti terorizmu, ki spoštuje človekove pravice, lahko uspešno uresničuje le, če se nenehno nadzoruje spoštovanje teh pravic, sistematično preučuje neposredne in posredne posledice vseh ukrepov in instrumentov, privzetih v boju proti terorizmu, ter varuje pravico žrtev, ki utrpijo škodljive posledice protiterorističnih ukrepov, do pravnega varstva in odškodnine;
Considers that an anti‑terrorism strategy which respects human rights can only be successfully pursued if respect for those rights is permanently monitored, the direct and indirect consequences of all measures and instruments adopted in the fight against terrorism are systematically examined and the right of victims adversely affected by anti-terrorism measures to seek remedies and compensation is safeguarded;