natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
6. zahteva, da vlade in parlamenti držav članic, zlasti v Združenem kraljestvu, na Irskem in v Nemčiji, pomagajo preiskovalnemu odboru pri nalogi, ob polnem upoštevanju načela zanesljivega sodelovanja, ki ga določajo pogodbe.
Requires that the governments and parliaments of Members States, in particular those of the United Kingdom, Ireland and Germany, assist the Committee of Inquiry in its task with full respect for the principle of loyal cooperation established in the Treaties.
POVZETEK MANDATA
The Mandate
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta B6-0050/2006 z dne 18. januarja 2006 o ustanovitvi Preiskovalnega odbora o krizi družbe „Equitable Life Assurance Society“, objava v UL poteka. , da ustanovi Preiskovalni odbor z 22 člani za preiskavo domnevnih kršitev ali nepravilnosti pri izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti v povezavi s krizo družbe Equitable Life Assurance Society, brez poseganja v pristojnosti nacionalnih sodišč ali sodišč Skupnosti.
Decision of the European Parliament B6-0050/2006 of 18 January 2006, setting up a Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Society, publication in OJ pending. to set up a Committee of Inquiry of 22 members to investigate alleged contraventions or maladministration in the application of Community law in relation to the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society, without prejudice to the jurisdiction of national or Community courts.
Skrbi, zaradi katerih se je Odbor ustanovil, je prej povzročilo več peticij Evropskemu parlamentu.
The concerns which led to the setting up of the Committee had previously been raised via several petitions to the European Parliament.
Peticiji 0611/2004, Arthur White (Britanec), in 0029/2005, Paul Braithwaite (Britanec), v imenu članov skupine Equitable Members' Action Group (EMAG), in poznejše peticije o isti temi, ki so jih predložili nemški in irski pobudniki.
Petitions 0611/2004 by Arthur White (British) and 0029/2005 by Paul Braithwaite (British), on behalf of the Equitable Members' Action Group (EMAG) and subsequent petitions on the same subject submitted by German and Irish petitioners.
Te peticije oblikujejo podlago in izhodiščno točko preiskave ter so pomagale pri osredotočenju usmeritve.
These petitions form the basis and point of departure of the inquiry and have helped focus its direction.
Zato je bilo ključno potrditi in ohraniti vlaganja pobudnikov in jih povabiti na seje Odbora, da bi določili položaj.
It was therefore crucial to acknowledge and maintain input from the petitioners, and invite them to the Committee's meetings in order to set the scene.
Osrednja vloga teh posebnih peticij kaže tudi splošen pomen parlamentarnega Odbora za peticije pri spremljanju izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti.
The central role of these particular petitions also reflects the general importance of Parliament's Petitions Committee in monitoring the application of Community law.
Pomembno si je zapomniti, da področje uporabe preiskave omejujeta mandat s členom 193 Pogodbe ES in Sklep Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije o uresničevanju preiskovalne pravice Evropskega parlamenta.
It is important to bear in mind that the scope of the inquiry is limited by the mandate, by Article 193 of the EC Treaty and by the Decision of the Parliament, Council and Commission on the exercise of the European Parliament's right of inquiry.
Sklep 95/167/ES, Euratom, ESPJ Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z dne 19. aprila 1995 o določbah, ki podrobneje urejajo uresničevanje preiskovalne pravice Evropskega parlamenta, UL L 113 19/5/1995, str.
Decision 95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 19 April 1995 on the detailed provisions governing the exercise of the European Parliament's right of enquiry, OJ L 113 19/5/1995, p.2
1) preiskava domnevnih kršitev ali nepravilnosti pri izvajanju Direktive 92/96/EGS s strani Združenega kraljestva;
1) Investigation into alleged contraventions or maladministration in the application of Directive 92/96/EEC by the UK;
2) ocena regulativne ureditve Združenega kraljestva glede na družbo Equitable Life;
2) Assessment of the UK regulatory regime in respect of Equitable Life;
3) status zahtevkov in ustreznost pravnih sredstev, ki so na voljo zavarovancem;
3) Status of claims and adequacy of remedies available to policy holders;
Končno mora odbor „oblikovati vse predloge, ki so za to potrebni“.
Finally, the Committee is required to "make any proposals that it deems necessary in this matter."
Ob upoštevanju tega področja uporabe je odbor sprejel delovni pristop za alinee, ki jih vključuje mandat, da se jasno razlikujejo:
With this scope in mind, the committee adopted a working approach to the indents contained in the mandate, so as to clearly distinguish:
· preiskave na ravni držav članic glede:
· investigations at the Member State level concerning:
o prenosa/izvajanja (alinea 1);
o transposition / implementation (indent 1);
o ureditve/nadzor (alinea 3) in
o regulation / supervision (indent 3) and;
o mehanizmov odškodnine (alinea 4) na eni strani ter
o redress mechanisms (indent 4) on the one hand, and;
· vprašanje vloge Komisije na drugi strani (alinea 2).
· the question of the Commission's role on the other hand (indent 2).
Glej Prilogo pregleda strukture.
See the annex for an overview of the structure.
Te štiri točke so se razvijale postopno prek različnih delovnih dokumentov, ki sestavljajo to vmesno poročilo o preiskavi, to bo predstavljeno na plenarnem zasedanju pred poletjem 2006, v skladu s Sklepom, ki ustanavlja Preiskovalni odbor.
These four points are being gradually developed through different working documents that form this interim report on the investigation, which is to be presented to the Plenary before the 2006 summer in accordance with the Decision setting up the Committee of Inquiry.
Preiskava se je ločila od prejšnjih in stalnih nacionalnih preiskav s sprejetjem evropske perspektive .
The inquiry has set itself apart from previous and ongoing national investigations by adopting a European perspective .
Da bi to dosegli, je bila analiza narejena primerjalno , vključno z Združenim kraljestvom, Nemčijo, Irsko in vsaj še eno drugo državo članico, ki ima dobro razvito industrijo finančnih storitev, kot sta Nizozemska ali Španija.
In order to achieve this, the analysis is being done in a comparative way, including the UK, Germany, Ireland and at least one other Member State with a well developed financial services industry, such as the Netherlands or Spain.
Glede obdobja, ki ga obsega, mandat omenja, da je treba začeti z začetkom veljavnosti tretje Direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju (Direktiva Sveta 92/96/EGS), 1. julij 1994, in zaključiti z dogodki, ki so se zgodili v družbi Equitable Life, tj.
As far as the period covered, the mandate mentions that it should begin with the entry into force of the Third Life Directive (3LD), 1 July 1994, and should end with the events that occurred at Equitable Life, i.e., 1999-2001.
Zasnove ukrepov
Lines of Action
1) Preiskava domnevnih kršitev ali nepravilnosti pri izvajanju Direktive 92/96/EGS s strani Združenega kraljestva
1) Investigation into alleged contraventions or maladministration in the application of Directive 92/96/EEC by the UK
Ena od bistvenih nalog odbora je preučiti, ali je bila Direktiva 92/96/EGS
One of the core tasks of the Committee is to examine whether Directive 92/96/EEC
Odbor je predvsem pozvan, da analizira celoten regulativni okvir in predpise EU za zavarovalniški sektor ter da razjasni, katere določbe veljajo za primer družbe Equitable Life.
The Committee firstly is called upon to analyse the overall EU legislative and regulatory framework for the insurance sector and clarify which provisions apply to Equitable Life's situation.
Razen preverjanja v Združenem kraljestvu mora odbor izvesti primerjalno analizo in opredeliti določbe nacionalne zakonodaje, ki uveljavlja zahteve direktiv, ter preučiti, ali so bile te zahteve v celoti in pravočasno prenesene.
As well as looking at the UK, the Committee has to carry out a comparative analysis, identifying the provisions of national law intended to give effect to the requirements of the Directives, and examining whether these requirements were transposed in a full and timely manner.
Drugič se od Odbora zahteva, da preuči, ali je bilo izvajanje direktive s strani različnih organov Združenega kraljestva usklajeno z zakonodajo EU.
Secondly, the Committee is called upon to examine if the application of the Directive by the different UK authorities has been in conformity with EU legislation.
Poskusiti mora razjasniti odgovornosti različnih finančnih organov, vpletenih v nadzor družbe Equitable Life v referenčnem obdobju.
It must try to clarify the respective responsibilities of the various financial authorities involved in the supervision of Equitable Life during the reference period.
Izvajajo se podrobne preiskave, da bi ugotovili, kdo, kdaj in kako je nadzoroval plačilno sposobnost družbe Equitable Life in tudi računovodstvo ter prakse oskrbe in kako so se organi odzvali na mogoče slabosti.
Detailed investigations are being carried out to establish by whom, when and how Equitable Life's solvency, as well as its accounting and provisioning practices, were supervised and how authorities responded to possible weaknesses.
2) Ocena regulativne ureditve Združenega kraljestva glede na družbo Equitable Life
2) Assessment of the UK regulatory regime in respect of Equitable Life
Čeprav ta del mandata zahteva obsežno preiskavo, so standardi ravnanja, ki jih je treba preiskati, nekako povezani z zakonodajo Skupnosti, sicer bi Odbor presegel meje, ki jih določa člen 193 ES.
Although this part of the mandate calls for a wide-ranging investigation, the standards of conduct to examine are related in some way to Community law, otherwise the Committee would exceed its limits as fixed by Article 193 EC.
Razen tega se zdi primerno primerjati sistem Združenega kraljestva z regulativnimi pristopi na Irskem, v Nemčiji in drugih državah članicah EU.
Furthermore, it appears appropriate to compare the UK regime with regulatory approaches in Ireland, Germany and another EU Member States.
Odbor je pozvan, da preuči, kako je regulativni sistem Združenega kraljestva primerljiv z enakimi sistemi v okolju EU.
In short, the Committee is called upon to examine how the UK regulatory system compares when judged against its peers in an EU environment.
Poročilo lorda Penrosa
The Penrose report
Vzpostavitev državne blagajne za preiskavo lorda Penrosa avgusta 2001.
The Treasury set up Lord Penrose’s inquiry in August 2001.
Razen tega se bo stalna preiskava parlamentarnega varuha človekovih pravic in varuha za zdravstvene storitve v Združenem kraljestvu „za določitev, ali se je zadevna domača regulativna ureditev ustrezno upravljala,“ zaključila to jesen.
In addition, an ongoing investigation by the UK Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman " to determine whether the relevant domestic regulatory regime was properly administered" is due to be concluded this autumn.
Po Sklepu, ki ustanavlja Preiskovalni odbor, referenčno obdobje za to smer preiskave zadeva „vsaj“ leto 1989 in je zato daljše od referenčnega obdobja za točko 1.
According to the Decision setting up the Committee of Inquiry, the reference period for this line of investigation goes back "at least" to 1989 and is thus wider than the reference period for point 1.
3) Status zahtevkov in ustreznost pravnih sredstev, ki so na voljo zavarovancem
3) Status of claims and adequacy of remedies available to policy holders
Najprej je treba določiti število oškodovanih evropskih državljanov, ki niso iz Združenega kraljestva, in razjasniti okoliščine, v katerih so sklenili police pri družbi Equitable Life (tj. ko so jih sklenili, ali so jih sklenili v Združenem kraljestvu ali zunaj njega, neposredno ali prek posrednikov itd.).
Firstly, it is necessary to determine the number of affected non-UK European citizens and to clarify the circumstances under which they acquired Equitable Life policies (i.e., when they purchased them, whether they purchased them within or outside the UK, directly or through intermediaries, etc...).
Potem je treba zbrati informacije glede na obseg finančne škode, povzročene zavarovancem, ki niso iz Združenega kraljestva, in mogoče ukrepe, ki so jih sprožili, da bi prejeli odškodnino.
Secondly, information is to be collected as to the magnitude of the financial damage caused to non-UK policy-holders and possible actions they might have undertaken to obtain compensation.
Ta smer preiskave je povezana z načelom „enotnega uradnega dovoljenja“ in nadzorom „matične države“ iz tretje Direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju
This line of investigation is connected to the principle of "single official authorization" and "home State" control contained in the 3LD.
Uvodni izjavi 6 in 7 ter člen 8. .
Recitals 6, 7 and Article 8.
Odbor bo naknadno preučil sistem pravnih sredstev, ki je na voljo zavarovancem.
The Committee subsequently will examine the system of legal remedies available for those policyholders.
Obstajata dva mogoča poteka dogodkov, odvisno od rezultatov preiskave odbora v okviru točk 1 in 2.
There are two possible scenarios depending on the results of the Committee's investigations under points 1 and 2.
Če bo ugotovljeno, da je bil regulativni sistem Združenega kraljestva usklajen z zakonodajo EU, bo odbor vseeno moral preučiti možnost zavarovancev, ki lahko zahtevajo odškodnino v okviru zakonodaje Združenega kraljestva, in tudi možnost državljanov EU iz drugih držav članic, ki se zlasti glede tega srečujejo s težavami.
Should the UK regulatory system be found to have been in conformity with EU law, the Committee would nevertheless need to look into the possibility of policyholders being able to claim damages under UK law, as well as the possibility of EU citizens from other Member Sates encountering particular difficulties in that regard.
Če bo ugotovljeno, da je Združeno kraljestvo kršilo zakonodajo EU, se lahko odbor osredotoči tudi na sistem sodnega varstva v okviru zakonodaje EU.
If the UK was found to be violating EU law, the Committee could also focus on the system of judicial protection under EU law.
Države članice so dolžne povrniti izgubo in škodo, ki je bila povzročena posameznikom s kršenjem zakonodaje Skupnosti, za katero so odgovorne, v skladu z merili, ki jih je razvilo Sodišče.
Member States are obliged to make good loss and damage caused to individuals by breaches of Community law for which they can be held responsible according to criteria developed by the Court of Justice.
Ta vprašanja je treba dodatno razjasniti z oceno, ali so matična sodišča ustrezno sposobna za zaščito pravice do odškodnine in ali v različnih državah članicah obstajajo različni sanacijski standardi.
These questions should be further clarified by evaluating whether domestic courts are adequately able to protect this right to reparation or whether different remedial standards exist in different Member States.
Ocena spremljanja izvajanja s strani Komisije
Assessment of the Commission's monitoring of implementation
Odbor je pozvan, da preuči, kako je Komisija spremljala prenos zadevnih direktiv s strani Združenega kraljestva.
The Committee is called upon to examine the way in which the Commission monitored the transposition of the relevant Directives by the UK.
Prvič, ugotoviti je treba, ali je Komisija obravnavala izvajanje zakonodaje, za katero so organi Združenega kraljestva sporočili, da je usklajena z zakonodajo Skupnosti, že od začetka, ter ali je najprej opredelila vse pomanjkljivosti in naknadno zahtevala dodatna pojasnila.
Firstly, it is necessary to establish whether the Commission considered the implementing legislation notified to it by the UK authorities to be in compliance with Community law from the outset, or whether it had initially identified any shortcomings and subsequently requested further clarifications.
Razen tega je treba preveriti, ali je Komisija kdaj sprožila postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev in ali je preiskovala kakršne koli s tem povezane pritožbe državljanov.
In addition, it had to be ascertained whether the Commission ever started infringement proceedings or if it investigated any related complaints by citizens.
Delovanje Komisije pri spremljanju prenosa je treba ovrednotiti glede na pravno obveznost v okviru Pogodbe in na ravni politične odgovornosti.
The Commission's performance in monitoring transposition should be measured both against its legal obligations under the Treaty and in terms of its political responsibility.
Če ta odbor ugotovi, da se Združeno kraljestvo ni uskladilo z zakonodajo EU, bo nadaljnja naloga v okviru tega dela mandata oceniti, ali bi se bilo položaju mogoče izogniti, če bi Komisija izpolnjevala svoje obveznosti spremljanja prenosa.
If this Committee found that the UK did not comply with EU legislation, a further task under this part of the mandate will be to assess whether the situation might have been avoided had the Commission fulfilled its obligation to monitor transposition.
Preiskovalni odbor je 23. marca 2006 potrdil te zasnove ukrepov, kot jih je predlagala poročevalka v delovnem dokumentu (PE 371.716v01.00).
On 23 March 2006 the Committee of Inquiry endorsed these lines of action as proposed by the Rapporteur in her Working Document (PE 371.716v01.00).
Seznam ukrepov in preiskav, ki jih bo izvedel Preiskovalni odbor
List of Actions and Investigations to be undertaken by the Committee of Inquiry
1) Zaslišanje ustreznih prič pred odborom:
1) Hearing of relevant witnesses before the Committee:
- zaslišanje vlagateljev peticij in oškodovanih zavarovancev;
- Hearing of petitioners and affected policyholders;
- povabilo lorda Penrosa in parlamentarnega varuha človekovih pravic Združenega kraljestva;
- Invitation of Lord PENROSE and the UK Parliamentary Ombudsman;
- povabilo višjih nosilcev odločanja zakladnice Združenega kraljestva;
- Invitation of senior decision makers from UK Treasury
- povabilo komisarja Mccreevyja in generalnega direktorja GD Markt;
- Invitation of Commissioner McCREEVY and the Director General of DG Markt
- povabilo sedanje uprave družbe Equitable Life Assurance Society;
- Invitation of the Equitable Life Assurance Society's current management;
- povabilo zakonodajalcev na področju financ iz Združenega kraljestva, Irske in Nemčije;
- Invitation of Financial Regulators from the UK, Ireland and Germany
2) Tržna analiza Združenega kraljestva:
2) UK market analysis:
- celovita analiza ozadja trga življenjskega zavarovanja v Združenem kraljestvu in tudi družbe Equitable Life (zgodovina, stanje, nadaljnje možnosti) ter dogodkov v zvezi s krizo družbe Equitable Life;
- Overall background analysis of the UK life assurance market, as well as of Equitable Life as a company (history, state-of-play, prospects) and the events surrounding the crisis of Equitable Life;
- analiza ozadja regulativnega okvira in predpisov EU v zvezi z družbo Equitable Life;
- Background analysis of EU legislative and regulatory framework in relation to Equitable Life;
- pojasnitev pristojnosti organov Združenega kraljestva v zvezi z nadzorom družbe Equitable Life;
- Clarification of UK authorities' respective competences with regards to the supervision of Equitable Life;
3) Primerjalna tržna analiza:
3) Comparative market analysis:
- analiza poročila lorda Penrosa glede na zahteve EU in regulativne standarde v drugih državah članicah;
- Analysis of the Penrose report in the light of EU requirements and of regulatory standards in other Member States;
- primerjalna analiza prenosa v Združeno kraljestvo in druge države članice v zvezi z nadzorom zavarovalnic, z uporabo „tabele prenosa“ (raziskava po naročilu „proračuna strokovnega znanja“ odbora);
- Comparative analysis of transposition in the UK and other Member States, with regard to the supervision of insurance undertakings, using "table of transposition" (study commissioned through the Committee's "Expertise Budget"),
- primerjalna raziskava (v zvezi z raziskavo o prenosu) regulativnih pristopov v Združenem kraljestvu in drugih državah članicah EU;
- Comparative study (in connection with the study on transposition) on regulatory approaches in the UK and other EU Member States;
- pregled komunikacije in sodelovanja med upravnimi organi v različnih državah članicah, zlasti v Združenem kraljestvu, Nemčiji in na Irskem;
- Examination of communication and cooperation between the regulatory bodies in the different Member States, especially the UK, Germany and Ireland;
- primerjalna raziskava pravnih sredstev, ki so v okviru zakonodaj Združenega kraljestva in EU na voljo zavarovancem Združenega kraljestva in drugih držav članic (zunanja raziskava po naročilu „proračuna strokovnega znanja“ odbora);
- Comparative study of the remedies available under UK and EU law for policyholders from the UK and other Member Sates (external study commissioned under the Committee's "Expertise Budget");
- zbiranje informacij o številu oškodovanih zavarovancev iz Združenega kraljestva in drugih držav članic ter o obsegu storjene škode;
- Gather information about the number of affected policy-holders from the UK and non-UK Member States and the magnitude of damages suffered;
- določitev statusa zahtevkov zavarovancev;
- Determine status of policyholders' claims;
- misije za ugotavljanje dejstev v Združenem kraljestvu, na Irskem in v Nemčiji, zato da se srečajo vlagatelji peticij in predstavniki finančnih organov ter/ali zaslišijo pristojni organi za ugotovitev, ali so se ustrezne določbe pravilno uporabljale;
- Fact-finding missions to UK, Ireland and Germany to meet petitioners and representatives of financial authorities, and/or hearing of competent authorities in order to establish if the relevant provisions were properly applied;
- od Komisije zahtevati informacije in dokumentacijo glede:
- Request information and documentation from the Commission regarding:
§ prenosa ustreznih direktiv in njihove uporabe s strani pristojnih organov v referenčnem obdobju;
§ the transposition of the relevant Directives and their application by competent authorities during the reference period;
§ ukrepov, ki jih je sprejela Komisija v zvezi s spremljanjem izvajanja;
§ actions taken by the Commission with regard to monitoring implementation;
§ spremljanja prenosa tretje direktive v Združeno kraljestvo, vključno z ustrezno korespondenco z organi Združenega kraljestva;
§ the monitoring of the transposition of the Third Directive in the UK, including relevant correspondence with the UK authorities;
Povzetek pristopa, ki ga je predlagal poročevalec
Summary of the approach proposed by the Rapporteur
Vprašanje: Kako ste izvajali direktivo?
Q: How did you implement?
Vprašanje: Kako ste ali bi uredili s predpisi?
Q: How did you/ or would you have regulated?
Druge države?
Other State?
Vprašanje: Kateri mehanizmi so/so bili na voljo zavarovancem v vaši državi?
Q: What mechanisms are/were available
Združeno kraljestvo
to claimants in your country?
Španija/Nizozemska Druge države
Spain / Netherlands Other State
Izpeljava preiskave bo v pomoč pri reševanju povezane zadeve v povezavi s Komisijo:
Conducting this research will then assist in responding to the related issue concerning the Commission:
POVZETEK SPREJETIH UKREPOV
SUMMARY OF ACTIONS TAKEN
Do zdaj sprejeti ukrepi in analizirani dokazi
Actions taken and evidence analysed so far
Zaslišanje ustreznih prič pred odborom
Hearing of relevant witnesses before Committee
Na sejah 23. marca 2006 in 25. aprila 2006 je preiskovalni odbor poslušal pričanja številnih prič, vključno z zavarovanci družbe Equitable Life, ki so poslali peticijo na Evropski parlament, drugimi zavarovanci iz Združenega kraljestva in Irske, predstavniki Evropske komisije ter izvršnim direktorjem družbe Equitable Life.
During its meetings on 23 March 2006 and 25 April 2006, the Committee of Inquiry heard testimonies of several witnesses, including Equitable Life policyholders, who had previously petitioned the European Parliament, other policyholders from the UK and Ireland, representatives of the European Commission and the current chief executive of Equitable Life.
Naslednje priče so predložile ustne dokaze:
The following witnesses provided oral evidence:
Seja z dne 23. marca 2006:
Meeting of 23 March 2006: