natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Državni organi in Europol v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in Konvencijo o Europolu ter glede na resnost grožnje ocenijo, ali bi bilo treba obvestiti državo članico ali ne."
National authorities shall assess, in accordance with national law and the Europol Convention and according to the seriousness of the threat, whether the Member States concerned should be informed.”
Konvencija o Europolu še ni bila prenesena v vse nacionalne zakonodaje držav članic, zato jo je treba v besedilu omeniti.
Since the Europol Convention has not yet been incorporated into the domestic law of all the Member States, it must be mentioned in the text.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 3 D (novo)
ARTICLE 1, PARAGRAPH 3 D (new)
Člen 5, odstavek 2 (Sklep 2003/170/PNZ)
Article 5, paragraph 2 (Decision 2003/170/JHA)
Častniki za zvezo držav članic v tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, Konvencijo o Europolu, ustreznimi mednarodnimi instrumenti in veljavnimi določbami, ki urejajo varstvo osebnih podatkov, posredujejo informacije v zvezi z resnejšimi kaznivimi grožnjami do drugih držav članic neposredno častnikom za zvezo držav članic in Europolu, če je ta zastopan v tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji."
Member States’ liaison officers in third countries or international organisations shall, in accordance with national law, the Europol Convention and relevant international instruments and subject to compliance with applicable provisions governing the protection of personal data, provide information relating to serious criminal threats to other Member States directly to the liaison officers of the Member State in question and Europol, if that Member State is represented in the third country or international organisation concerned.”
Kot prvič, Konvencija o Europolu še ni bila prenesena v vse nacionalne zakonodaje držav članic, zato jo je treba v besedilu omeniti.
Firstly, since the Europol Convention has not yet been incorporated into the domestic laws of all the Member States, it must be mentioned in the text.
Kot drugič je treba za zagotavljanje solidarnosti med državami članicami v primeru groženj eni izmed njih tej državi čim prej posredovati informacije, četudi ta v državi, iz katere prihaja nevarnost, nima svojega častnika za zvezo.
Secondly, in the interests of mutual support amongst the Member States where one of them is the target of a threat, that State should be able to be notified of the fact as quickly as possible, even though it has no liaison officer in the country from which the possible threat comes.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 3 E (novo)
ARTICLE 1, PARAGRAPH 3 E (new)
Člen 5, odstavek 4 (Sklep 2003/170/PNZ)
Article 5, paragraph 4 (Decision 2003/170/JHA)
Konvencija o Europolu še ni bila prenesena v vse nacionalne zakonodaje držav članic, zato jo je treba v besedilu omeniti.
Since the Europol Convention has not yet been incorporated into all Member States’ domestic law, it must be mentioned in the text.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 4
ARTICLE 1, PARAGRAPH 4
Člen 8, odstavek 3 (Sklep 2003/170/PNZ)
Article 8, paragraph 3 (Decision 2003/170/JHA)
Države članice lahko v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in Konvencijo o Europolu ter z namenom izmenjave pomembnih informacij zaprosijo Europol za uporabo častnikov za zvezo Europola, dodeljenih tretjim državam ali mednarodnim organizacijam.
In accordance with national law and the Europol Convention, Member States may make a request to Europol to use Europol liaison officers seconded to third countries or international organisations, with a view to the exchang e of relevant information.
Prošnje se preko nacionalnih enot držav članic v skladu s Konvencijo o Europolu naslovijo na Europol.
Requests shall be addressed to Europol via the Member States’ national units in accordance with the Europol Convention.”
Države članice v skladu s Konvencijo o Europolu zaprosijo Europol, če je to možno ali potrebno, za uporabo častnikov za zvezo Europola, dodeljenih tretjim državam ali mednarodnim organizacijam , da se popolnoma izkoristi kanale Europola za izmenjavo ustreznih informacij .
In accordance with (deletion) the Europol Convention, Member States shall ensure that, where possible and necessary, a request is made to Europol with a view to securing access to its liaison officers seconded to third countries or international organisations, so that full use can be made of Europol channels for the purpose of exchang ing relevant information.
Prošnje se preko nacionalnih enot držav članic v skladu s Konvencijo o Europolu naslovijo na Europol.
Requests shall be addressed to Europol via the Member States’ national units in accordance with the Europol Convention. “
Druga formulacija se zdi bolj primerna.
The revised wording seems more appropriate.
Člen 8, odstavek 4 (Sklep 2003/170/PNZ)
Article 8, paragraph 4 (Decision 2003/170/JHA)
Europol zagotovi, da mu njegovi častniki za zvezo, napoteni v tretje države ali mednarodne organizacije, zagotovijo informacije o resnih nevarnostih, ki grozijo državam članicam v obliki kaznivih dejanj, za katera je v okviru Konvencije o Europolu pristojen Europol.
Europol shall ensure that its liaison officers seconded to third countries and international organisations provide it with information relating to serious threats to Member States of criminal offences for which Europol is competent under the Europol Convention.
Takšne informacije se v skladu s Konvencijo o Europolu preko nacionalnih enot posredujejo pristojnim organom zadevnih držav članic.
Such information shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Member States concerned via the national units in accordance with the Europol Convention.”
Europol zagotovi, da mu njegovi častniki za zvezo, napoteni v tretje države ali mednarodne organizacije, zagotovijo informacije o resnih nevarnostih, ki grozijo državam članicam v obliki kaznivih dejanj, za katera je v okviru Konvencije o Europolu pristojen Europol.
Europol shall ensure that its liaison officers seconded to third countries and international organisations provide it with information relating to serious threats to the Member States of criminal offences for which Europol is competent under the Europol Convention.
Takšne informacije se v skladu s Konvencijo o Europolu preko nacionalnih enot posredujejo pristojnim organom zadevnih držav članic.
Such information shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the Member States concerned through the intermediary of the national units in accordance with the Europol Convention.”
Ta obrazložitev se ne nanaša na slovensko različico.
The above wording makes the role conferred on Europol more binding as regards the forwarding of information in cases where the Member States are the target of serious threats.
Pobuda Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sprejetje Sklepa Sveta o spremembah Sklepa 2003/170/PNZ o skupni uporabi uradnikov za zvezo, napotenih s strani organov pregona držav članic
Initiative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland with a view to adopting a Council Decision amending Decision 2003/170/JHA on the common use of liaison officers posted abroad by the law enforcement agencies of the Member States
Nadomeščeni poročevalec
Previous rapporteur(s)
o poročilu Komisije o politiki konkurenčnosti 2004
on the Commission report on competition policy 2004
- ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o politiki konkurenčnosti 2004 ( SEC(2005)0805 ),
– having regard to the Commission report on Competition Policy 2004 ( SEC(2005)0805 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstev Evropskega sveta v Lizboni 23. in 24. marca 2000, Evropskega sveta v Göteborgu 15. in 16. junija 2001, Evropskega sveta v Laeknu 14. in 15. decembra 2001, Evropskega sveta v Barceloni 15. in 16. marca 2002 ter Evropskih svetov v Bruslju 20. in 21. marca 2003, 25. in 26. marca 2004 ter 22. in 23. marca 2005,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000, the Göteborg European Council of 15 and 16 June 2001, the Laeken European Council of 14 and 15 December 2001, the Barcelona European Council of 15 and 16 March 2002, and the Brussels European Councils of 20 and 21 March 2003, 25 and 26 March 2004, and 22 and 23 March 2005,
– ob upoštevanju poročila iz novembra 2004 z naslovom „Sprejeti izziv - lizbonska strategija za rast in zaposlovanje“ skupine na visoki ravni o lizbonski strategiji pod predsedstvom Wima Koka,
– having regard to the report of November 2004 entitled 'Facing the challenge - The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment' from the High Level Group chaired by Mr Wim Kok,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta št. 1/2003 z dne 16. januarja o izvajanju pravil konkurence iz členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe
– having regard to Council Regulation 1/2003 of 16 January 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty
1. in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 733/2004 z dne 7. aprila 2004 glede vodenja postopkov Komisije iz členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe ES
1. and Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty
UL L 123, 27.4.2004, str.
OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p.
UL L 24, 29.1.2004, str.
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 glede izvajanja Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty
UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str.
OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p.
1 . , Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 364/2004 z dne 25. februarja 2004 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 70/2001 glede širitve področja njene uporabe na pomoč raziskavam in razvoju
1. , Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 of 25 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 as regards the extension of its scope to include aid for research and development
22 . in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 363/2004 z dne 25. februarja 2004, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 68/2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči za usposabljanje
22. , and Commission Regulation (EC) No 363/2004 of 25 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah“
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty'
UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str.
OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti glede storitev splošnega interesa in posebej sodbe Altmark
– having regard to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities on services of general interest and, in particular, the Altmark judgment
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 in člena 112(2) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 45 and Rule 112(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6‑0065/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0065/2006 ),
3. podpira politiko konkurence, za katero si prizadeva EU na splošno, in ceni posodobitve, ki jih je na področju konkurence izpeljala Komisija ;
Supports the competition policy pursued by the EU in general, and expresses its appreciation of the modernising reform which the Commission has carried out in the field of competition;
6. obžaluje, da poročilo o konkurenčnosti 2004 ne posveča posebnega poglavja razpravi o storitvah splošnega interesa, kot je to bilo od vključno poročila 2001 dalje, ter poziva Komisijo, da v bodočih poročilih ponovno uporabi ta pristop;
Regrets that the 2004 competition report does not dedicate a separate chapter to a discussion of services of general interest, as was the case in the 2001 report onwards, and urges the Commission to reinstate this approach in its future reports;
10. čestita Komisiji za njen odločen in profesionalen pristop k boju proti zlorabam prevladujočega položaja in pozdravlja posvetovanje Komisije o bolj učinkovitem izvajanju člena 82;
Congratulates the Commission on its firm and professional approach to the fight against abuses of dominant positions and welcomes the Commission's consultation on a more effective implementation of Article 82;
12. poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva za spodbujanje pravilnega izvajanja pravil o konkurenci v vseh državah članicah in naj pravočasno posreduje, če pravila o konkurenci niso zadovoljivo ali enakopravno uporabljana;
Urges the Commission to make an effort to promote the correct application of the competition rules in all Member States, and to intervene in good time where the competition rules are being applied unsatisfactorily or in a discriminatory manner;
18. predlaga, da morajo v primeru velikih omrežnih javnih storitev konkurenco obvladovati zavezujoče obveznosti javnih storitev, zato da so zagotovljene nujne naložbe in se prepreči nastanek novih monopolov;
Suggests that, in the case of major networked public services, competition must be guided by strong public service obligations so as to ensure necessary investment and to prevent the emergence of new monopolies;
22. poudarja, da je pomembno spodbujati obveščenost potrošnikov, opozarja na njeno poglavitno vlogo pri zagotavljanju prave kulture konkurence in prav tako poudarja, da je treba preučiti možnosti zasebnih odškodnin v primeru protikonkurenčnega obnašanja;
Highlights the importance of encouraging consumer information, draws attention to the fundamental role of consumer information in ensuring that there is a genuine competition culture, and points out the need to consider at Community level private compensation in cases of anti-competitive conduct;
27. pozdravlja pozitivni odgovor Komisije na priporočila Parlamenta v zvezi z nadaljnjim razvojem evropskih dni konkurence, vključno s sodelovanjem potrošniških organizacij in nacionalnih medijev v procesu načrtovanja evropskih dni konkurence;
Welcomes the Commission's positive response to Parliament's recommendations concerning the further development of European Competition Days, including the integration of consumer organisations and the national media in the planning process of European Competition Days;
Poročilo o politiki konkurenčnosti 2004
Report on Competition Policy 2004
Datum imenovanja
Date adopted
Namestniki (člen 17882)), navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitutes under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem glede spremembe Protokola o možnostih ribolova in finančnem prispevku, določenih s Sporazumom o sodelovanju na področju morskega ribištva med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo, za obdobje od 1. avgusta 2001 do 31. julija 2006
on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the amendments to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Agreement on cooperation in the sea fisheries sector between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for the period 1 August 2001 to 31 July 2006
PE 365.137
PE v04-00
– ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Sveta ( KOM(2005)0591 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation ( COM(2005)0591 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 in člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 37 and 300(2) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0433/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0433/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6–0066/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0066/2006 ),
Cilj tega predloga je spremeniti obstoječi protokol, priložen k Sporazumu o sodelovanju na področju morskega ribištva med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo.
The purpose of this proposal is to amend the existing protocol to the agreement on cooperation in the sea fisheries sector between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania.
Na podlagi sklepov tehnične delovne skupine, ki so jo sestavljali predstavniki mavretanskih upravnih organov in Evropske komisije in katere tehnični sestanki so potekali od 30. junija do 2. julija ter 14. in 15. julija v Nouakchottu in od 7. do 10. septembra 2004 v Bruslju, ter v luči razpoložljivih znanstvenih mnenj sta pogodbenici med sestankom mešane komisije 10. septembra ter 15. in 16. decembra 2004 v Bruslju sklenili spremeniti trenutne možnosti ribolova.
On the basis of the conclusions of the technical working group comprising representatives of the Mauritanian administration and the European Commission, which held technical meetings from 30 June to 2 July and on 14 and 15 July in Nouakchott and from 7 to 10 September 2004 in Brussels, and in the light of the scientific opinions available, the two parties decided at the Joint Committee meetings held on 10 September and on 15 and 16 December 2004 to modify the current fishing opportunities.
Sporazum o spremembi obstoječega protokola je z izmenjavo pisem postal uraden.
The agreement on the amendments to the existing protocol has been formalised by an exchange of letters.
Na osnovi tega Komisija predlaga, da Svet sprejme ta sporazum v obliki izmenjave pisem glede spremembe protokola.
The Commission proposes, on this basis, that the Council adopt this agreement in the form of an exchange of letters on the amendments to the protocol.
Predlog sklepa Sveta o začasni uporabi sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem glede spremembe protokola je predmet ločenega postopka.
A proposal for a Council decision on the provisional application of the agreement in the form of an exchange of letters on the amendments to the protocol is the subject of a separate procedure.
Odnosi na področju ribištva med Evropsko unijo in Mavretanijo segajo v leto 1987, ko je bil sklenjen sporazum o ribolovu, ki ga vsebuje Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 4143/87 z dne 14. decembra 1987
Fisheries relations between the European Union and Mauritania date back to 1987, with the conclusion of the fisheries agreement contained in Council Regulation (EEC) No 4143/87 of 14 December 1987
Leta 1995 je bil potem, ko je Maroko enostransko preklical sporazum o ribolovu, ki je bil sklenjen leta 1992 za obdobje štirih let, sprejet dodatek k protokolu 1993–1996 za obdobje od 15. novembra 1995 do 31. julija 1996 z namenom nadomestitve izgube možnosti ribolova glavonožcev z ladjami Evropske skupnosti v maroških vodah.
In 1995, following the unilateral termination by Morocco of the fisheries agreement concluded in May 1992 for a period of four years, a supplement to the 1993-96 protocol was adopted for the period 15 November 1995 to 31 July 1996 which aimed to offset the loss of fishing opportunities for the Community cephalopod fleet in Moroccan waters.
20. junija 1996 je bil parafiran nov sporazum z Mavretanijo za obdobje petih let, ki je zagotavljal stalno prisotnost flote držav članic Skupnosti od 31. julija istega leta dalje.
On 20 June 1996 a new fisheries agreement with Mauritania covering a period of five years was initialled, allowing continuity in the presence of the Community fleet from 31 July 1996.
31. julija 2001 sta obe strani parafirali nov protokol z namenom, da bi zagotovili tehnične in finančne pogoje ribolovnih dejavnosti ladij Evropske skupnosti v vodah Islamske republike Mavretanije za obdobje od 1. avgusta 2001 do 31. julija 2006.
On 31 July 2001 the two parties initialled a fresh protocol fixing the technical and financial conditions governing the fishing activities of Community vessels in the waters of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania during the period from 1 August 2001 to 31 July 2006.
Ta protokol je vnovič pokazal na potrebo po nadomestitvi izgub, ki jih je povzročila neobnovitev sporazuma o ribolovu z Marokom, ki je potekel 30. novembra 1999 in ki je postal najpomembnejši sporazum o ribolovu, sklenjen med Skupnostjo in tretjo državo.
Once again, this protocol reflected the need to offset the hardship caused by the non-renewal of the fisheries agreement with Morocco, which expired on 30 November 1999, and became the most important fisheries agreement to be concluded between the Community and a third country.
V spodnji tabeli je primerjava možnosti ribolova, določenih s protokolom, ki bo potekel julija 2006, z možnostmi ribolova, določenimi v protokolih, ki so bili priloženi predhodnim sporazumom:
The following table compares the fishing opportunities fixed in the protocol which will expire in July 2006 with those available under the protocols annexed to previous agreements:
Možnosti ribolova, določene s protokolom o ribolovu z Mavretanijo za obdobje od leta 2001 do 2006
Fishing opportunities under the 2001‑2006 fisheries protocol with Mauritania
Ribolovna kategorija
Fishing categories
Glavonožci (število plovil)
Cephalopod (number of vessels)
Raki razen rarogov (dovoljena tonaža (BRT) na leto)
Crustaceans other than crawfish (GRT per year)
Zamrzovalna plovila s pelagično vlečno mrežo (število plovil)
Pelagic freezer trawlers (number of vessels)
Plovila za ribolov tunov (število plovil)
Tuna seiners (number of vessels)
45 (34 plovil za ribolov tunov in 11 plovil za ribolov tunov z ribiško palico in površinskimi parangali)
45 (34 tuna seiners and 11 pole-and-line tuna vessels and surface longliners)
57 (40 plovil za ribolov tunov in 17 plovil za ribolov tunov z ribiško palico in površinskimi parangali)
57 (40 tuna seiners and 17 pole-and-line tuna vessels and surface longliners)
67 (36 plovil za ribolov tunov in 31 plovil za ribolov tunov z ribiško palico in površinskimi parangali)
67 (36 tuna seiners and 31 pole-and-line tuna vessels and surface longliners)
Senegalski oslič (dovoljena tonaža (BRT) na leto)
Black hake (GRT per year)
Pridnene vrste – ribolov z vlečno mrežo (dovoljena tonaža (BRT) na leto)
Demersal – trawling (GRT per year)
Rarogi (dovoljena tonaža (BRT) na leto)
Crawfish (GRT per year)
Glede finančnega prispevka EU je primerjava med tremi obdobji sledeča:
In terms of the EU financial contribution the three periods compare as follows:
Finančni prispevek ES, določen s protokolom o ribolovu z Mavretanijo za obdobje od leta 2001 do 2006
EC financial contribution under the 2001 ‑2006 fisheries protocol with Mauritania
Celotni finančni prispevek
Overall financial contribution
(v milijonih ECU/milijonih EUR)
(ecu m/euro m)
V okviru protokola, ki je v veljavi do 31. julija 2006, bi bilo treba poleg 61 % povišanja celotnega prispevka, ki trenutno znaša 430 milijonov EUR, v primerjavi z dosedanjim celotnim zneskom v višini približno 5,25 milijonov, določenim v okviru prejšnjega sporazuma, financiranju posebnih ukrepov za razvoj ribiškega sektorja nameniti 20 milijonov EUR (4 milijone EUR letno).
Under the protocol in force until 31 July 2006, apart from the 61% increase in the total financial allocation, which now stands at EUR 430 m, EUR 20 m (EUR 4 m per year) are to be set aside for the funding of specific measures aimed at developing the fishing industry, compared to a total of around 5.25 m under the previous agreement.
Med predvidene ukrepe sodijo podpora raziskavam, nadzoru ribolova, izobraževanju na področju pomorstva, razvoju ribolovnih statistik, reševanju na morju, ter institucionalna podpora sistemu upravljanja z ribolovnimi dovoljenji, prav tako pa podpora mornarjem, stroškom organizacije in sodelovanja na seminarjih in mednarodnih srečanjih ter razvoju malega ribolova.
The planned measures consist of support for research, fisheries surveillance, maritime training, the development of fisheries statistics, sea rescue, institutional support for the system for managing fishing licences and support for managing seamen, expenses incurred in organising and attending international seminars and meetings and the development of artisanal fishing.