natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ta izraz predstavlja točno številko, ki se odšteje od skupnih ogljikovih hidratov, ki imajo zelo majhen vpliv na krvni sladkor; čisti ogljikovi hidrati = skupni ogljikovi hidrati – glicerin – organske kisline.
This term would be a net number which subtracts from total carbohydrates those carbohydrates which have a very low impact on blood sugar; net carb = total carbohydrates - glycerine - organic acids.
Sladkorni alkoholi se ne odštejejo zato, ker bi to lahko vplivalo na krvni sladkor, ki je odvisen od predelave in priprave živil.
Sugar alcohols would not be subtracted because they may affect blood sugar depending on the processing and formulation of the foods.
Dokazano je bilo, da diete s čistimi ogljikovimi hidrati prispevajo k izgubi teže.
It has been proven that net-carbohydrate diets can contribute to weight loss.
Navedbe v zvezi s čistimi ogljikovimi hidrati se ujemajo z rastjo povpraševanja potrošnikov po podatkih o vsebnosti čistih ogljikovih hidratov v živilih.
Claims relating to net carbohydrate content would meet the growing demand from consumers for information about net carbohydrate content in foods.
Priloga, točka 7 b (novo) za točko "Brez nasičenih maščob"
Annex, point 7 b (new) after point 'Saturated Fat-Free'
NIZKA VSEBNOST OGLJIKOVIH HIDRATOV
LOW IN CARBOHYDRATES
Trditev o izdelkih z nizko vsebnostjo ogljikovih hidratov in katera koli trditev s podobnim pomenom za potrošnika lahko velja le za izdelke z vsebnostjo manj od 5 g čistih ogljikovih hidratov na postrežen izdelek, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da čisti ogljikovi hidrati predstavljajo točno številko, ki se odšteva od ogljikovih hidratov z zelo majhnim vplivom na krvni sladkor; čisti ogljikovi hidrati = skupni ogljikovi hidrati – glicerin – organske kisline.
A claim that a product is low in carbohydrates, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains no more than 5g net carbohydrates per serving of product, taking account of the fact that net carbohydrates are a net number which subtracts those carbohydrates which have a very low impact on blood sugar; net carb = total carbohydrates - glycerine - organic acids.
Dokazano je bilo, da diete z nizko vsebnostjo ogljikovih hidratov prispevajo k izgubi teže.
It has been proven that low-carbohydrate diets can contribute to weight loss.
Navedbe v zvezi z nizko vsebnostjo ogljikovih hidratov se ujemajo z rastjo povpraševanja potrošnikov po podatkih o nizki vsebnosti ogljikovih hidratov v živilih.
Claims relating to low carbohydrate content would meet the growing demand from consumers for information about low carbohydrate content in foods.
Priloga, točka 7 c (novo) za točko 'Brez nasičenih maščob'
Annex, point 7 c (new) after point 'Saturated Fat-Free'
ZNIŽANI OGLJIKOVI HIDRATI
REDUCED CARBOHYDRATES
Trditev o izdelkih z znižano vsebnostjo ogljikovih hidratov in katera koli trditev s podobnim pomenom za potrošnika lahko velja le za izdelke z vsebnostjo manj od 10 g čistih ogljikovih hidratov na postrežen izdelek, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da čisti ogljikovi hidrati predstavljajo točno številko, ki se odšteva od ogljikovih hidratov z zelo majhnim vplivom na krvni sladkor; čisti ogljikovi hidrati = skupni ogljikovi hidrati – glicerin – organske kisline.
A claim that a product is reduced in carbohydrates, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains no more than 10g net carbohydrates per serving of product, taking account of the fact that net carbohydrates are a net number which subtracts those carbohydrates which have a very low impact on blood sugar; net carb = total carbohydrates - glycerine - organic acids.
Dokazano je bilo, da diete z znižano vsebnostjo ogljikovih hidratov prispevajo k izgubi teže.
It has been proven that reduced-carbohydrate diets can contribute to weight loss.
Navedbe v zvezi z znižano vsebnostjo ogljikovih hidratov se ujemajo z rastjo povpraševanja potrošnikov po podatkih o znižani vsebnosti ogljikovih hidratov v živilih.
Claims relating to reduced carbohydrate content would meet the growing demand from consumers for information about reduced carbohydrate content in foods.
Priloga, točka 18
Annex, point 18
NARAVNI VIR VITAMINOV IN/ALI MINERALOV
NATURAL SOURCE OF VITAMINS AND/OR MINERALS
VIR VITAMINOV IN/ALI MINERALOV
SOURCE OF VITAMINS AND/OR MINERALS
Trditev, da je živilo naravni vir vitaminov in/ali mineralov, in katera koli trditev s podobnim pomenom za potrošnika lahko velja le za izdelke z vsebnostjo najmanj 15 % priporočenega dnevnega vnosa na 100 g ali 100 ml, določenega v Prilogi k Direktivi Sveta 90/496/EGS.
A claim that a food is a natural source of vitamins and/or minerals, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains at least 15% of the recommended daily allowance specified in the Annex of Council Directive 90/496/EEC per 100 g or 100 ml.
Trditev, da je živilo vir vitaminov in/ali mineralov, in katera koli trditev s podobnim pomenom za potrošnika lahko velja le za izdelke z vsebnostjo najmanj 15 % priporočene hranilne vrednosti (RNV) na 100 g (trdna) in 7,5 % RNV na 100 ml (tekoča) ali 5 % RNV na 100 kcal (12 % RNV na 1 MJ) ali 15 % RNV na porcijo.
A claim that a food is a source of vitamins and/or minerals, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains at least 15% of the recommended nutritional values (RNV) per 100g (solids) and 7.5% of the RNV per 100 ml (liquids), or 5% of the RNV per 100 kcal (12 % of the VNR per 1 MJ) or 15% of the RNV per portion .
Če so živila naravni vir vitaminov in/ali mineralov je lahko pred trditvijo beseda „naravno“ ali „naraven“.
If foods are natural sources of vitamins and/or minerals, the claim may be preceded by the words "naturally" or "natural".
Pogoji, na katerih temelji uporaba navedbe „vir“ vitaminov ali mineralov, se morajo oblikovati na pogojih določenih v zakoniku Codex Alimentarius, npr. uporaba različnih mejnih vrednosti, ki določajo razliko med trdnimi in tekočimi izdelki.
The conditions to which the use of the claim "source of" vitamins or minerals is subject should be modelled on the conditions laid down in the Codex Alimentarius, i.e. apply different thresholds establishing a distinction between solid and liquid products.
Poleg tega so navedbe mejnih vrednosti, ki jih je predlagala Komisija, resno škodljive za mlečne izdelke, kljub dobro poznanemu in pomembnemu prispevanju pri vnosu kalcija.
Moreover, the reference thresholds proposed by the Commission are likely to be seriously prejudicial to dairy products, despite their well-known and important contribution to calcium intake.
Priloga, točka 24 a (novo)
Annex, point 24 a (new)
VIR ŠKROBA
SOURCE OF STARCH
Trditev, da je živilo vir škroba, in katera koli trditev s podobnim pomenom za potrošnika lahko velja le za izdelke z vsebnostjo najmanj 15 % škroba na 100 g.
A claim that a food is a source of starch, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains at least 15g of starch per 100g.
Ker nekateri potrošniki potrebujejo izdelke z vsebnostjo škroba zaradi zdravstvenih razlogov, mora biti omogočeno, da se jih tako označuje.
As some consumers require products containing starch for health reasons, it should be possible for them to be labelled as such.
Vrednosti naj ustrezajo določilom iz zakonika Codex Alimentarius.
The values comply with the provisions of the Codex Alimentarius.
Priloga, točka 24 b (novo)
Annex, point 24 b (new)
VIR SESTAVLJENIH OGLJIKOVIH HIDRATOV
SOURCE OF COMPLEX CARBOHYDRATES
Trditev, da je živilo vir sestavljenih ogljikovih hidratov, in katera koli trditev s podobnim pomenom za potrošnika lahko velja le za izdelke z vsebnostjo najmanj 25 g sestavljenih ogljikovih hidratov na 100 g.
A claim that a food is a source of complex carbohydrates, and any other claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may be made only where the food contains at least 25 g of complex carbohydrates per 100 g.
Sestavljeni ogljikovi hidrati sestojijo iz dolgih verig enostavnih sladkorjev.
Complex carbohydrates are made up of long chains of simple sugars.
V naravni obliki jih najdemo v žitih, sadju, stročnicah (grah in fižol) ter v drugi zeleni zelenjavi.
They are found in their natural state in cereals, fruit, pulses (peas and beans), and other green vegetables.
Vsebujejo vse vrste prebavljivih ogljikovih hidratov razen monosaharidov in disaharidov.
They include every type of digestible carbohydrates except mono- and disaccharides.
Naslednja hranila so bistvena za energijo v živilih: beljakovine, ogljikovi hidrati in maščobe.
The energy in a food is supplied essentially by the following nutrients: proteins, carbohydrates, and fats.
Glede na prehranska priporočila več evropskih držav naj bi bil vnos zgornjih hranil naslednji:
According to the dietary recommendations of various European countries, the intake of the above three nutrients should be as follows:
– ne več od 30 do 35 % maščob;
- not more than 30-35% of energy should come from fats;
– od 10 do 15 % beljakovin;
- between 10 and 15% of energy should come from proteins;
– najmanj 50 % ogljikovih hidratov (po možnosti v obliki sestavljenih ogljikovih hidratov).
- not less than 50% of energy should come from carbohydrates (preferably in the form of complex carbohydrates).
Zato je pomembno obveščati potrošnike o živilih, ki so vir ogljikovih hidratov ali so z njimi bogata, da se lahko odločijo za bolj zdrav način prehranjevanja.
It is therefore important to inform consumers about foods that are a source of, or high in, carbohydrates so as to make them opt for healthier kinds of diets.
Priloga, točka 24 c (novo)
Annex, point 24 c (new)
Trditev, da ima živilo visoko vsebnost škroba, in katera koli trditev s podobnim pomenom za potrošnika lahko velja le za izdelke z vsebnostjo najmanj 30 g škroba na 100 g.
A claim that a food is high in starch, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains at least 30g of starch per 100g.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prehranskih navedbah in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on nutrition and health claims made on foods
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov
OPINION of the COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
(*) Okrepljeno sodelovanje med odbori – člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Enhanced cooperation between committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
Pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja in podpira predlog Komisije, ki je odziv na resolucije Parlamenta iz marca 1998 o Zeleni knjigi o splošnih načelih živilske zakonodaje v EU in iz junija 2001 o Beli knjigi o varnosti živil.
The draftsperson welcomes and supports the Commission's proposal which responds to the Parliament's resolutions of March 1998 on the Green Paper on the General Principles of Food Law in the EU and of June 2001 on the White Paper on Food Safety.
Pripravljavec mnenja zlasti podpira uvajanje splošnih načel in pogojev za uporabo navedb in trditev, pozdravlja vzpostavitev seznama prehranskih navedb, pogojev za primerjalne navedbe, razlikovanja med zdravstvenimi trditvami, ki veljajo za telesne funkcije, in tistimi, ki veljajo za zmanjšanje tveganja za nastanek bolezni, ali opredelitve potrošnika na podlagi sodb SES.
The draftsperson particularly supports the introduction of general principles and conditions for the use of claims welcomes the establishment of the list of nutrition claims, conditions for comparative claims, distinction between health claims relating to bodily functions and the ones referring to reduction of disease risk or the definition of a consumer based on the ECJ rulings.
Vendar pa nekateri vidiki predloga zahtevajo izboljšave.
However, there are various aspects of the proposal which require improvement.
Še zlasti:
In particular:
Opisovanje hranilnih lastnosti
Nutritional Profiling
Predlog Komisije, ki skuša omejiti prehranske navedbe in zdravstvene trditve za živila, ki so "dobrodejna".
The Commission’s proposal seeks to limit nutrition and health claims to foods that are "good for you".
Pripravljavec mnenja se ne strinja s tem, da mora biti vloga vlade – lokalne, nacionalne ali evropske – odločanje o tem, katera živila so za potrošnike dobrodejna.
The draftsman does not believe that it should be the role of government – whether local, national or European – to take decisions as to which foods are good for consumers.
Predlog Komisije sproža številna vprašanja, na katera je treba odgovoriti pred obravnavo opisov hranilnih lastnosti:
The Commission’s proposal raise a number of questions which must be answered before the principle of nutritional profiles can be considered:
Ali lahko, če imajo različni ljudje različne prehranske potrebe – odvisne od dejavnikov, kot so življenjski slog, starost in spol – resnično govorimo o dobrih in slabih živilih namesto o dobrih ali slabih načinih prehranjevanja?
If different people have different dietary needs - depending on factors such as lifestyle, age, gender - can we really talk about good foods and bad foods, rather than good diets and bad diets?
Ali imajo potrošniki pravico do podatkov o hranilnosti ne glede na morebiten opis hranilnih podatkov?
Do consumers have a right to this nutritional information regardless of any nutritional profile?
Zakaj bi moralo biti sprejemljivo, da bi bil pust sir opisan kot bogat s kalcijem, ne pa tudi polnomastni sir, čeprav lahko vsebuje vsaj toliko ali celo več kalcija?
Why should it be acceptable for a low-fat cheese to claim to be high in calcium but not for a high-fat cheese that may contain as much or more calcium?
Ali je smiselno, medtem ko ne želimo, da bi se aromatizirane gazirane pijače z dodanim alkoholom tržile kot dobrodejne, pridelovalcem vina prepovedati, da trdijo, da so zmerne količine rdečega vina koristne za srce?
Whilst we don't want to see alcopops marketed as being good for you, is there any sense in preventing red wine producers from claiming that moderate quantities of red wine can be good for your heart?
Splošne zdravstvene trditve
General health claims
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da bi bila prepoved splošnih in implicitnih zdravstvenih trditev nesorazmeren ukrep.
The draftsman believes that a ban on all general and implied health claims would be a disproportionate measure.
Kjer so trditve podprte z znanstvenim znanjem in ne zavajajo potrošnikov, predmet in obseg takih trditev ne smeta biti zakonodajna zadeva.
Where claims are supported by scientific knowledge and do not mislead consumers, the subject and scope of the claim should not be a matter for legislation.
Obstoječa zakonodaja o zavajajočem oglaševanju in označevanju živil že prepoveduje uporabo neresničnih ali zavajajočih podatkov.
Existing legislation on misleading advertising and on food labelling already prohibits the use of untrue of misleading claims.
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da bi bilo primerneje bolj dosledno in učinkovito uveljavljati tako obstoječo zakonodajo, kot pa vpeljati več zakonov, ki najverjetneje ne bodo nič bolje uveljavljeni.
The draftsman believes that it would be preferable to enforce such existing legislation more consistently and more effectively rather than introduce more legislation unlikely to be enforced any better.
Splošne trditve so vsakdanje oglaševalsko sredstvo.
General claims are a common advertising tool.
Najuspešnejše oglaševalske akcije trdijo, da bomo z njihovim proizvodom – do neke mere – srečnejši, bolj zdravi, bogati ali privlačnejši za nasprotni spol.
Most successful advertising campaigns claim that their product will – at some level – make you happier, healthier, richer or more attractive to the opposite sex.
Jasno je, da bi bilo smešno proizvajalcem sladkarij prepovedati prikazovanje slik veselih otrok v oglasih ali na embalaži, ali prepovedati, da bi žitni proizvodi za zajtrk napeljevali na to, da so z njimi otroci pripravljeni na nov dan.
It would clearly be ludicrous to tell sweet manufacturers that they shouldn’t display pictures of happy children either in their adverts or on their packaging, or to stop a breakfast cereal from suggesting that their cereal sends children to school ready for the day ahead.
Če je to dovoljeno v oglaševanju, zakaj ne bi bilo tudi na embalaži ali v izložbenem oknu?
If this is allowed in advertising, why shouldn’t it be allowed on the packaging or on the in-store display?
Predlog Komisije lahko ustvari stanje pravne negotovosti v industriji oglaševanja živil.
The Commission’s proposal threaten to create a state of legal uncertainty around the food advertising industry.
Pripravljavec mnenja je zaskrbljen, ker ne kaže, da bi Komisija popolnoma obravnavala položaj podjetij, katerih blagovne znamke vsebujejo zdravstvene trditve, ki bi bile v skladu s predlogom uredbe omejeni.
The draftsman is concerned that the Commission does not appear to have fully considered the position of companies whose brand names contain health claims that would be restricted under the proposed Regulation.
Blagovne znamke bi bile ogrožene, razen če bi bila za te blagovne znamke dovoljena izjema.
Unless these trademarks were to be given an exemption then the brands themselves could be threatened.
Vendar pa bi bilo, če bi bile dovoljene izjeme, nepravično do ostalih proizvajalcev, ki navajajo podobne trditve za podobne proizvode.
However, if they were to be given such an exemption, it would appear to be unfair to other manufacturers who make similar claims for similar products.
Pripravljavec mnenja verjame, da odgovor ni v posebnih izjemah, ampak v oddelkih predloga, ki bi najstrožje omejili uporabo blagovnih znamk – zlasti opisovanja hranilnih lastnosti in omejitve splošnih in implicitnih zdravstvenih trditev – ki jih je treba ponovno obravnavati, tako da bi bili pravični za celotno živilsko industrijo in da ne bi povzročali nadaljnje zmede med potrošniki.
The draftsman believe that the answer is not for a specific exemption but for those sections of the proposals that would most severely restrict the use of brand names – particularly nutritional profiling and restrictions on general and implied health claims – should be reconsidered so as to be fair to the whole of the food industry and to avoid creating further confusion amongst consumers.
Prepreke za trgovino
Barriers to Trade
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da je kakršno koli zakonodajo treba obravnavati v širšem smislu obstoječih smernic WHO, Codexa Alimentariusa in Sveta Evrope, prav tako tudi nedavni predlog Komisije za uredbo v zvezi s splošnimi pravili za dodajanje vitaminov in mineralov v živila („obogatitev živil“).
The draftsman believes that any legislation should be considered within the broader context of existing WHO, Codex Alimentarius and Council of Europe guidelines, as well as take into consideration the recent Commission proposal for a Regulation concerning common rules for the addition of vitamins and minerals to foods (‘food fortification’).
Kakršni koli novi standardi ali predpisi morajo biti, kar najbolj, v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi.
Any new standards or regulations should, as far as is possible, be in line with international standards.
Postopek odobritve
Authorisation Procedure
Pripravljavca osnutka skrbi, da je predlog postopka odobritve prezapleten in bi preobremenil Evropsko agencijo za varno hrano.
The draftsman is concerned that the proposed authorisation procedure is too complicated and would place a heavy burden on the European Food Safety Authority.
Pomembno je, da imajo vse zainteresirane stranke – vključno s potrošniškimi in industrijskimi skupinami – možnost za predložitev predlogov za odobrene zdravstvene trditve.
It is important that all interested parties – including consumer and industry groups - should be able to submit proposals for authorised health claims.
To bi pomagalo zagotoviti, da so lahko obstoječe, natančne trditve odobrene brez nalaganja nesorazmernega bremena na proizvajalce živil.
This would help to ensure that existing, accurate claims can be authorised without placing a disproportionate burden on food manufacturers.
Toda pripravljavec osnutka je zaskrbljen, da bi predlog postopka Komisije preprečil hitro odobritev novih trditev v zvezi z novimi znanstvenimi dokazi.
However, the draftsman is concerned that the Commission’s proposed procedure would prevent new claims from being authorised quickly in light of new scientific evidence.
Zaradi teh zadržkov mora Komisija predlagati poenostavljen postopek.
To address these concerns, the Commission should come forward with a simplified procedure.
(3a) Nove in nepotrebne prepreke za trgovanje z živili s tretjimi državami se ne smejo ustvarjati.
(3a) New and unnecessary barriers to trade in food with third countries should not be created.
Zato bi bilo treba nove določbe kar najbolj približati delu Codexa Alimetariusa o prehranskih navedbah in zdravstvenih trditvah.
Therefore provisions should be aligned as closely as possible to the work of the Codex Alimentarius on nutrition and health claims.
Nekatere vlade držav članic trenutno raziskujejo in razvijajo potrošniku najbolj prijazno obliko za prostovoljne sisteme označevanja živil na sprednji strani embalaže.
Some Member State governments are currently researching and developing the most consumer friendly format for voluntary front of pack nutrition labelling schemes.
Ko nacionalna vlada enkrat uvede takšne sisteme in dokler ne obstaja noben sistem za celotno EU, ne bodo prepovedani, dokler ustrezajo načelom, določenim v tej uredbi.
Once such schemes are introduced by the national government and until such time as there is an EU wide scheme, they shall not be prohibited as long as they are in line with the principles established by this Regulation.
(6) Živila, ki se oglašujejo s takimi navedbami ali trditvami, lahko potrošnik razume kot proizvode, ki imajo v primerjavi s podobnimi ali drugimi proizvodi, ki jim take hranilne snovi niso dodane, hranilne, psihološke in zdravstvene prednosti.
(6) Foods promoted with claims may be perceived by consumers as having a nutritional, physiological or other health advantage over similar or other products without such nutrients added.
Da bi delovali v nasprotju s tem možnim neželenim učinkom, je primerno, da se v zvezi s proizvodi, za katere so navedene takšne navedbe ali trditve, uvede določene omejitve.
To counter this potential undesirable effect, it is appropriate to impose certain restrictions as regards the products bearing claims.
V tem smislu je prisotnost določenih snovi v proizvodu – na primer vsebnost alkohola v proizvodu – ali profil hranilne vrednosti proizvoda primerno merilo pri določanju , ali smejo biti na proizvodu navedene navedbe ali trditve.
In this context, factors such as the presence of certain substances such as the alcohol content of the product or the nutrient profile of the product are appropriate criteria for determining whether the product can bear claims.
Da bi delovali v nasprotju s tem možnim neželenim učinkom, je primerno, da se v zvezi s proizvodi, za katere so navedeni takšne navedbe ali trditve, uvede določene omejitve.
To counter this potential undesirable effect, it is appropriate to impose certain restrictions as regards the products bearing claims.
V tem smislu je prisotnost določenih snovi v proizvodu – na primer alkohola – treba upoštevati pri določanju, ali smejo biti na proizvodu navedene navedbe ali trditve.
In this context, factors such as the presence of certain substances such as alcohol, must be taken into account in determining whether the product can bear claims .
Treba je podpreti upoštevanje vsebnosti alkohola pri določanju, ali smejo biti na proizvodu navedene navedbe ali trditve, ni pa primerno uvajati celotne prepovedi za sicer natančne navedbe ali trditve za celo skupino živil.
While taking into account the presence of alcohol in considering whether the product can bear claims should be supported, it would not be appropriate to introduce a blanket ban on otherwise accurate claims for whole categories of foods.