natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
34. pozdravlja ugotovitev Evropskega računskega sodišča iz točke II Posebnega poročila št. 1/2005, v skladu s katero „mešani status“ OLAF, ki ima preiskovalno avtonomijo, o ostalih nalogah pa poroča Komisiji, ni ogrozil neodvisnosti njegove preiskovalne funkcije
Welcomes the finding by the European Court of Auditors in paragraph II of its Special Report No 1/2005 that the hybrid status of OLAF, which has investigative autonomy but reports to the Commission for its other duties, has not adversely affected the independence of its investigations
Posebno poročilo št. 1/2005 Evropskega računskega sodišča o upravljanju Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) z odgovori Komisije, UL C 202, 18.8.2005, str.
Court of Auditors' Special Report No 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), together with the Commission's replies, OJ C 202, 18.8.2005, p.
3. ; poudarja, da je naloga nadzornega odbora OLAF zagotoviti neodvisnost preiskav
1. ; stresses that it is the OLAF Supervisory Committee's responsibility to ensure the independence of investigations
Glej člen 11(1)(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1073/1999. ;
See Article 11(1), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999. ;
Preiskave s strani OLAF in varstvo temeljnih pravic
OLAF investigations and protection of fundamental rights
Zadeva T-309/03, Camós Grau proti Komisiji (še neobjavljena v Zodl). o primeru IRELA, na podlagi katere mora Komisija svojemu zaposlenemu plačati nadomestilo;
Case T-309/03, Camós Grau v. Commission (not yet published in the ECR). in connection with the IRELA affair, ordering the Commission to pay compensation to an official;
39. opozarja na ugotovitev Evropskega računskega sodišča iz točke IX Posebnega poročila št. 1/2005 , da nadzor nad zakonitostjo tekočih preiskovalnih postopkov in spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic preiskovanih oseb zdaj ni zagotovljen na neodvisen način;
Draws attention to the finding of the European Court of Auditors in paragraph IX of its Special Report No 1/2005 that there is no independent guarantee, at present, that investigative procedures in progress are legal or that the fundamental rights of persons under investigation are safeguarded;
Prednostne naloge in načrti za delo OLAF
Priorities and prospects for OLAF's work
44. podpira priporočilo Evropskega računskega sodišča iz točke 37 Posebnega poročila št. 8/2005 , da je treba dejavnosti OLAF osredotočiti na njegovo preiskovalno funkcijo;
Backs the recommendation by the European Court of Auditors in paragraph 37 of its Special Report No 8/2005 that the activities of OLAF should be geared to its investigative function;
46. pozdravlja, da so omenjena priporočila Računskega sodišča skladna s stališčem, ki ga je Evropski parlament oblikoval že v svoji resoluciji z dne 4. decembra 2003 k poročilu Komisije o oceni dejavnosti Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF)
Welcomes the fact that the Court of Auditors' recommendations referred to are congruent with the stance taken by Parliament in its resolution of 4 December 2003 on the Commission report on the evaluation of the activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)
Boj proti tihotapljenju cigaret in trženju ponarejenih izdelkov
Combating cigarette smuggling and the marketing of counterfeit products
Te številke so ocene.
EUR 200 m)
Izračun temelji na poročilih iz 24 držav članic o zaseženih cigaretah.
These figures are estimates calculated on the basis of reports from 24 Member States on confiscated cigarettes.
Nadalje OLAF izhaja, da se zaseže le 10 %
OLAF furthermore assumes that only 10% of smuggled goods are seized. ;
48. ugotavlja, da so leta 2004 pristojni organi zasegli več kot 3,5 milijard cigaret ter da se je nujnost rešitve problema tihotapljenja in trženja ponarejenih izdelkov od leta 2001 znatno povečala;
Notes that over 3.5 billion cigarettes were confiscated in 2004 by the competent authorities and that the problem of smuggling and of marketing counterfeit products has become markedly more urgent since 2001;
52. z veseljem ugotavlja, da so sporazum od njegove sklenitve podpisale naslednje države: Danka, Irska, Latvija, Litva, Malta, Avstrija, Slovaška, Slovenija, Republika Češka, Madžarska in Ciper;
Is pleased to note that the following countries have signed this agreement since it was concluded: Denmark, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Austria, Slovakia, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Cyprus;
53. poziva ostale države članice (Estonijo, Švedsko in Združeno kraljestvo), da sporazum čim prej podpišejo;
53 Calls on the other Member States (Estonia, Sweden and the United Kingdom) to sign the agreement as quickly as possible,
57. meni, da ima sporazum s PMI tako daljnosežen pomen, da morata OLAF in Komisija poskusiti skleniti podobne sporazume z drugimi mednarodnimi proizvajalci cigaret; poziva OLAF, da do 1. decembra 2006 poroča o napredku na tem področju;
Takes the view that the agreement with PMI is of such far-reaching importance that OLAF and the Commission should do everything within their power to conclude similar agreements with other international cigarette manufacturers; calls on OLAF to report by 1 December 2006 on progress in this area;
Boj proti goljufijam, povezanim z davkom na dodano vrednost
Combating VAT fraud
Glej delovni program Evropskega računskega sodišča za leto 2006, 10.1.2006, str.
See the European Court of Auditors' work programme for 2006 of 10 January 2006, p.
3. izvedlo pregled sodelovanja organov upravljanja pri uporabi davka na dodano vrednost na področju trgovanja znotraj Skupnosti, vključno z bojem proti goljufijam, povezanim z davkom na dodano vrednost, pri tako imenovanih davčnih vrtiljakih
3. will be conducting a review of cooperation between administrations in applying VAT in intra-Community trade, including combating VAT fraud in connection with 'carousel' transactions
Pregled je v zvezi z izvajanjem Uredbe (ES) št. 1798/2003 Sveta z dne 7. oktobra 2003 o upravnem sodelovanju na področju davka na dodano vrednost in razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 218/92, UL L 264, 15.10.2003, str.
The review relates to implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 of 7 October 2003 on administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 218/92, OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p.
64. z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da Evropsko računsko sodišče v točki 6.4 Letnega poročila za leto 2004 ponovno ― kot že nekaj let ― opozarja na slabosti nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov na področjih notranje politike, zaradi katerih se napake na ravni prejemnikov pomoči ne odkrijejo pravočasno; hkrati se je število preverjanj v letu 2004 zmanjšalo v primerjavi z letom 2003; poziva Komisijo, da predloži predlog o odpravljanju teh slabosti;
Notes with concern that in paragraph 6.4 of the 2004 annual report the European Court of Auditors again points - as it now has done for years - to weaknesses in supervisory and control systems in internal policy areas as a result of which errors at grant recipient level are not detected in time; at the same time, the number of audits fell in 2004 by comparison with 2003; calls on the Commission to submit a proposal as to how these weaknesses are to be rectified;
Ukrepi Komisije v zvezi z resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. junija 2005 o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in boju proti goljufijam
Commission follow-up to Parliament's resolution of 7 June 2005 on the protection of the financial interests of the Communities and the fight against fraud
66. upošteva odgovor Komisije na točko 25 resolucije v zvezi z izterjavo sredstev, ki so bila preveč ali neupravičeno izplačana ; vseeno meni, da te niso zadovoljive; zato opozarja na naslednje:
Notes the Commission's response to paragraph 25 of the resolution on the recovery of amounts paid in excess or in error ; regards it as unsatisfactory, however; therefore points out the following:
· v osnovi se je treba zahvaliti prigovarjanju Evropskega parlamenta, da se je na tem področju dosegel napredek;
· essentially, progress has been achieved in this area owing to Parliament pressure;
· Evropski parlament temu vprašanju pripisuje velik pomen in bo zato o tej temi pripravil poročilo;
· Parliament attaches considerable importance to this question and will therefore be producing a dedicated report on it;
· pozdravlja, da je Komisija leta 2004 po naključnem vzorcu preverjala postopke izterjave držav članic; v zvezi s tem prav tako pozdravlja, da je Komisija zavrnila 50 % vlog za ukinitev izterljivih zneskov; to ustreza 35,46 milijona EUR, ki jih morajo izterjati države članice;
· welcomes the fact that, in 2004, the Commission carried out sample checks on Member States' recovery procedures; welcomes also in this connection the fact that the Commission rejected 50% of applications to waive debts to be recovered; that represents EUR 35.46 m which the Member States must recover;
· na področju kmetijstva je bilo treba leta 2004 izterjati še 63,76 milijona EUR; k temu pridejo še preostanki iz preteklih let v višini 2.078 milijonov EUR; znesek 811 milijonov EUR je še odprt pred sodišči;
· in agriculture, EUR 63.76 m from 2004 still has to be recovered; in addition, there are EUR 2 078 m in arrears from previous years; an amount of EUR 811 m is pending before the courts;
· poudarja osnovno odgovornost držav članic za hitro in učinkovito izterjavo izgubljenih proračunskih sredstev; obžaluje, da države članice te odgovornosti niso dovolj upoštevale in da so zlasti svoje obveznosti do Komisije izpolnjevale precej pomanjkljivo;
· underscores Member States' primary responsibility for prompt and efficient recovery of lost budget funds; regrets the fact that, to date, the Member States have been inadequately meeting that responsibility and, in particular, are only sketchily meeting their reporting obligations towards the Commission;
· sprašuje po odzivu držav članic na pisma Komisije, v skladu s katerimi morajo izterjati prvih 650 milijonov EUR na področju kmetijstva
· asks what has been the reaction of the Member States to the Commission's letters requiring them to recover EUR 650 m within agriculture
Glej točko 16 zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 7. junija 2005. ;
See paragraph 16 of its above-mentioned resolution of 7 June 2005. ;
· poleg tega sprašuje, ali sta OLAF in Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja (GD AGRI) soglašala z delitvijo dela, v skladu s katero bo OLAF v prihodnje odgovoren za preiskave, GD AGRI pa za izterjavo sredstev
· asks furthermore whether OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (DG AGRI) have agreed on a division of labour under which, in future, OLAF will be responsible for investigations while DG AGRI will be responsible for recoveries
Glej točko 10 zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 7. junija 2005. ;
See paragraph 10 of its above-mentioned resolution of 7 June 2005. ;
69. kritizira, da Komisija do zdaj ni predložila nobenega vmesnega poročila o dejavnosti „delovne skupine Eurostat“ , čeprav ga je večkrat napovedala; pričakuje, da bo poročilo predloženo pred 1. julijem 2006;
Criticises the fact that, to date, the Commission has submitted no interim report on the activities of the ' Eurostat Task Force ' despite its having been announced on several occasions; expects it to be submitted before 1 July 2006;
71. je nezadovoljen z nejasnimi informacijami Komisije v zvezi z obnovo stavbe Berlaymont ; sprašuje, ali so se s strani tretjih pojavile nepravilnosti in kateri upravni ukrepi znotraj Komisije so bili sprejeti;
Is not satisfied with the Commission's unclear information on renovation of the Berlaymont Building ; asks whether there have been third-party irregularities and what administrative measures have been taken within the Commission;
Različne teme
Miscellaneous ad hoc issues
Zadeva C-176/03, Komisija proti Svetu (še neobjavljena v Zodl). , o pristojnostih evropskega zakonodajalca na področju kazenskega prava; poudarja, da meni, da je v nasprotju s pristopom, ki ga zagovarja Komisija
Case C-176/03, Commission v. Council (not yet published in the ECR). , on the powers of the European legislative authority in the area of criminal law; underscores the fact that, contrary to the approach championed by the Commission
Glej sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 (Zadeva C-176/03, Komisija proti Svetu) (COM (2005)0583). , potrebno preverjanje posameznih tekočih zakonodajnih predlogov; vztraja pri svojem mnenju, da je treba osnutek Direktive o kazenskopravni zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti opreti na člen 280 Pogodbe
See the Commission communication to the European Parliament and Council on the implications of the Court's judgment of 13 September 2005 (Case C-176/03, Commission v. Council) ( COM(2005)0583 ). , it regards a case-by-case review of ongoing legislative proposals as necessary; remains of the opinion that the draft directive on the criminal law protection of the Community's financial interests should be based on Article 280 of the Treaty
253, in zgoraj navedeno resolucijo z dne 4. decembra 2003. ; poziva Svet, da opusti svoje odklonilno stališče v zvezi s krepitvijo zaščite finančnih interesov Skupnosti s kazenskimi ukrepi, in da začne v prvo obravnavo;
253, and its above-mentioned resolution of 4 December 2003. ; calls on the Council to abandon its rejectionist stance on strengthened protection for the Community's financial interests through criminal law measures and to move to the first-reading stage;
Zaščita finančnih interesov Skupnosti in boju proti goljufijam – Letno poročilo 2004
Protection of the financial interests of the Communities and the fight against fraud - 2004 annual report
o predlogu Odločbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi postopka vzajemnega obveščanja glede ukrepov držav članic na področjih azila in priseljevanja
on the proposal for a Council decision on the establishment of a mutual information procedure concerning Member States' measures in the areas of asylum and immigration
**II Postopek sodelovanja (druga obravnava) večina oddanih glasov za odobritev skupnega stališča absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta za zavrnitev ali spremembo skupnega stališča
**II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament's component Members, to reject or amend the common position
*** Postopek privolitve absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta, razen v primerih, navedenih v členih 105, 107, 161 in 300 Pogodbe ES in členu 7 Pogodbe EU
*** Assent procedure majority of Parliament's component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
***II Postopek soodločanja (druga obravnava) večina oddanih glasov za odobritev skupnega stališča absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta za zavrnitev ali spremembo skupnega stališča
***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament's component Members, to reject or amend the common position
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI.....................................18
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS.............19
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0480 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0480 )
UL C … /Še neobjavljeno v UL. ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 66 pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 66 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 67 pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim ga je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0335/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 67 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0335/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 51, člena 41(4) in člena 35 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51, 41(4) and Rule 35 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0186/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0186/2006 ),
Uvodna izjava 3 a (novo)
Recital 3a (new)
(3a) Ta postopek deluje na dveh ravneh: na eni strani se prek spletnega omrežja uprave držav članic vzajemno obveščajo o sprejetih ukrepih na nacionalni ravni na področju azila in priseljevanja, na drugi strani pa politični organi o tematiki redno razpravljajo na evropski ravni.
(3a) This new procedure should operate on two levels: on the one hand, via the web-based network, the Member States' administrations inform each other on the measures taken at national level in the areas of asylum and immigration; on the other, the political authorities engage in regular debates at European level on those areas,
Pomembno je, da se ne vzpostavi le izmenjava podatkov na upravni ravni, ampak tudi razprava na politični ravni.
It is important not only to establish the exchange of information at the administrative level, but also to undertake a debate at the political level.
(4) Postopek obveščanja mora temeljiti na solidarnosti, preglednosti in vzajemnem zaupanju.
(4) The information procedure should be based on solidarity, transparency and mutual confidence ;
(4) Postopek obveščanja mora temeljiti na solidarnosti, preglednosti in vzajemnem zaupanju in privesti do skupnega in usklajenega pristopa do azilne politike in politike priseljevanja držav članic .
(4) The information procedure should be based on solidarity, transparency and mutual confidence , and should result in a concerted and coordinated approach to the asylum and immigration policies of the Member States,
(4a) Izvajanje takšnega postopka mora na ravni Skupnosti omogočiti poenostavitev, racionalizacijo in združitev obstoječih sistemov, struktur in omrežij na področju azila in priseljevanja.
The creation of this procedure should lead to the simplification, rationalisation and regrouping of the systems, structures and networks existing at Community level in the areas of asylum and immigration,
Obstaja že veliko število omrežij in prizadevanje novega zakonodajnega instrumenta ni dodati še eno omrežje, ampak bolje uskladiti in racionalizirati tista, ki že obstajajo.
There already exist a considerable number of networks, and the aim of this new legislative instrument is not to add yet another network, but to better coordinate and rationalise those already in existence.
(5) Zaradi učinkovitosti in dostopnosti mora biti spletno omrežje bistven element postopka obveščanja, ki se nanaša na nacionalne ukrepe na področju azila in priseljevanja.
(5) For reasons of efficiency and accessibility, a web-based network should be the essential element of the information procedure concerning national measures in the areas of asylum and immigration ;
(5) Zaradi učinkovitosti in dostopnosti mora biti spletno omrežje , ki ga ureja Komisija in mu bo zagotovila varnost in zaupnost, bistven element postopka obveščanja, ki se nanaša na nacionalne ukrepe na področju azila in priseljevanja.
(5) For reasons of efficiency and accessibility, a web-based network managed by the Commission, which will guarantee its security and confidentiality, should be the essential element of the information procedure concerning national measures in the areas of asylum and immigration;
(7) Ker države članice ciljev te odločbe, namreč varne izmenjave informacij in posvetovanja med državami članicami, ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in jih zaradi učinkov predvidenega ukrepa zato bolje dosežejo na ravni Skupnosti, lahko ta sprejema ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
(7) Since the objectives of this Decision, namely secure information exchange and consultation between Member States, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the effects of the envisaged action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta odločba ne posega dlje, kakor je potrebno za dosego navedenih ciljev.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives ;
(7) Ker države članice ciljev te odločbe, namreč varne izmenjave informacij , boljše usklajenosti in posvetovanja med državami članicami, ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in jih zaradi učinkov predvidenega ukrepa zato bolje dosežejo na ravni Skupnosti, lahko ta sprejema ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
(7) Since the objectives of this Decision, namely to secure information exchange and improve coordination and consultation between Member States, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the effects of the envisaged action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta odločba ne posega dlje, kakor je potrebno za dosego navedenih ciljev.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives ,
Ta odločba vzpostavlja postopek za vzajemno izmenjavo informacij, ki se nanašajo na nacionalne ukrepe na področju azila in priseljevanja, z uporabo spletnega omrežja in hkrati omogoča izmenjavo stališč o takšnih ukrepih .
This Decision establishes a procedure for the mutual exchange of information concerning national measures in the areas of asylum and immigration using a web-based network and allowing for an exchange of views on such measures .
Ta odločba vzpostavlja postopek za vzajemno izmenjavo informacij, ki se nanašajo na nacionalne ukrepe na področju azila in priseljevanja, z uporabo spletnega omrežja.
This Decision establishes a procedure for the mutual exchange of information concerning national measures in the areas of asylum and immigration using a web-based network .
Postopek omogoča vzpostavitev redne izmenjave mnenj o ukrepih, ki imajo lahko v več državah članicah ali na ravni Skupnosti pomemben vpliv ne le na upravni ampak tudi politični ravni znotraj Sveta.
This procedure will make it possible to prepare regular exchanges of views on measures liable to have a significant impact in several Member States or at Community level, not only at the administrative level but also at the political level, within the Council .
Države članice Komisiji in drugim državam članicam sporočijo naslednje ukrepe, ki jih nameravajo sprejeti na področju azila in priseljevanja, kadar bi ti ukrepi lahko imeli vpliv na druge države članice ali na Skupnost kot celoto:
Member States shall communicate to the Commission and the other Member States the following measures which they intend to take in the areas of asylum and immigration if these measures are susceptible of having an impact on other Member States or on the Community as a whole:
Države članice Komisiji in drugim državam članicam sporočijo naslednje ukrepe, ki jih nameravajo sprejeti oziroma so jih že sprejele na področju azila in priseljevanja, kadar bi ti ukrepi lahko imeli vpliv na druge države članice, na primer s tem, da preusmerijo ali pritegnejo migracijske tokove iz druge države članice ali vanjo, ali na Skupnost kot celoto:
Member States shall communicate to the Commission and the other Member States the following measures which they intend to take or have taken in the areas of asylum and immigration if these measures are susceptible of having an impact on other Member States , such as diverting or attracting migratory flows to or from another Member State, or on the Community as a whole:
(a) osnutek zakonodaje , najkasneje takrat, ko je predložena za sprejetje ; ter
(a) draft legislation , at the latest at the time of submission for adoption; and
(a) zakonodajna besedila , najkasneje takrat, ko so sprejeta, ali takoj potem ; ter
(a) legislative texts , at the latest at the time of their adoption or immediately after ; and
(b) osnutek mednarodnih dogovorov, najkasneje takrat, ko so parafirani.
(b) draft international agreements, at the latest at the time when they are initialled.
Člen 2, odstavek 1, točka a
Article 2, paragraph 1 a