natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisijo poziva, da zlasti spremlja izvajanje obveznosti, ki so jih Venezuela, Moldavija, El Salvador, Gvatemala, Kolumbija in druge države sprejele pred sklepom Komisije decembra 2005; na sploh poziva Komisijo, da redno spremlja izvajanje teh konvencij in po potrebi uporabi zaščitne določbe iz uredbe;
Calls on the Commission to apply objective criteria when granting GSP+ benefits to countries which have shown serious flaws in the implementation of the eight ILO conventions relating to Core Labour Standards, in particular to monitor implementation of commitments made by Venezuela, Moldova, El Salvador, Guatemala, Colombia and other specific countries in advance of the Commission decision of December 2005; in general, calls on the Commission to review regularly the implementation of these conventions and to apply, if necessary, the safeguards provisions contemplated in the Regulation.
93. poudarja, da morajo vse ocene izvajanja človekovih pravic za posamezne države vključevati analizo temeljnih pravic delavcev, kot je poudarjeno v členu 23 Splošne deklaracije človekovih pravic, členu 22 Pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah in členu 8 Pakta o ekonomskih, socialnih in kulturnih pravicah;
Points out that all country-specific human rights evaluations should include an analysis of the fundamental rights of workers’, as enshrined in Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 22 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and Article 8 of the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;
95. zahteva, da Komisija v Sporočilu Komisije o vlogi Evropske unije pri spodbujanju človekovih pravic in demokratizacije v tretjih državah od maja 2001 poroča o izvajanju svojih predlogov, čemur sledi temeljit pregled;
Asks the Commission for a report on how it has implemented its own proposals in the Commission Communication on the European Union’s role in promoting human rights and democratisation in third countries from May 2001, followed by a thorough review;
98. poudarja, da je v boju proti trgovini z ljudmi treba sprejeti pristop v zvezi z žrtvami trgovine, in v zvezi s tem pozdravlja osredotočenje na varstvo žrtev v načrtu EU za boj proti trgovini z ljudmi in njeno preprečevanje, ki ga je pripravil Svet
Emphasises that in the fight against in human beings a human rights approach with respect to the victims of trafficking should be adopted, and in this regard welcomes the focus on victim protection in the Council's EU plan for combating and preventing trafficking in human beings
UL C 311, 9.12.2005, str.
OJ C 311, 9.12.2005, p.
1. , ter poziva vse države članice, da ratificirajo Konvencijo Sveta Evrope o ukrepih za boj proti trgovini z ljudmi;
1. , and urges all Member States to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings;
100. pozdravlja vse večjo vlogo Parlamenta na področju človekovih pravic in pri zaščiti prizadevanj za izboljšanje razmer na področju človekovih pravic po vsem svetu s pregledovanjem dejavnosti drugih institucij in zlasti z nagrado Saharov;
Welcomes Parliament’s increasing role in the human rights sphere, and to safeguard commitments to improving human rights situations throughout the world by scrutinising the activities of other institutions and, in particular, through the Sakharov Prize;
102. poudarja potrebo, da se težave v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami vključijo v delo vseh parlamentarnih odborov in delegacij, ki se ukvarjajo z zunanjimi odnosi Evropskega parlamenta; v zvezi s tem namenja posebno pozornost delu, ki ga je opravil Odbor za razvoj pri organiziranju razprav o človekovih pravicah, ter poziva Komisijo in Svet, da upoštevata zaključke teh in drugih razprav o človekovih pravicah, ki so potekale v Parlamentu;
Stresses the need for human rights concerns to be mainstreamed into the work of all Parliamentary Committees and Delegations dealing with external relations of the European Parliament; in this respect, draws particular attention to the work done by the Development Committee in organising regular human rights debates, and calls on the Commission and the Council to follow up the conclusions of these and other human rights debates conducted in the Parliament;
105. zahteva, da pododbor sistematično spremlja resolucije na področju človekovih pravic, sprejete na podlagi člena 115, in krepi prizadevanja za dejavno obravnavo vprašanja človekovih pravic zunaj EU pri vseh dejavnostih Parlamenta, vključno z delom drugih odborov ter parlamentarnih delegacij;
Asks the Subcommittee to follow up human rights resolutions adopted pursuant to Rule 115 in a systematic manner, and to strengthen efforts to address actively the external human rights considerations of all activities of the Parliament, including the work of other committees as well as parliamentary delegations;
107. zahteva, da predsedstvo Parlamenta in konferenca predsednikov obravnavata, ali je mogoče sprejeti ukrepe za povečanje politične podpore članov pri glasovanju na plenarnih sejah o nujnih resolucijah Parlamenta na podlagi člena 115, če je mogoče tako, da se čas glasovanja prestavi na ustreznejši čas;
Asks the Bureau of the Parliament as well as the Conference of Presidents to consider whether measures could be taken in order to increase the political support given by members in plenary when voting on urgency resolutions of the Parliament pursuant to Rule 115, possibly by moving the voting time to a more appropriate timeslot;
111. pozdravlja zavezanost Parlamenta k obravnavi zapletenega vprašanja podpore človekovim pravicam in boja proti mednarodnemu terorizmu; poudarja, da je skladnost pristopa EU k obravnavi vprašanja človekovih pravic izrednega pomena, če želi biti EU verodostojen akter na mednarodnem prizorišču;
Welcomes Parliament’s undertaking to address the complex issue of upholding human rights alongside the fight against international terrorism; points out that consistency in the approach of the EU to different human rights issues is of utmost importance if the EU wants to be a credible actor internationally;
117. zahteva, da Komisija okrepi Urad za človekove pravice znotraj svojega Generalnega direktorata za zunanje odnose in s tem zagotovi dodatno osebje za obravnavo vprašanja človekovih pravic, da lahko izpolnjuje svojo dodatno funkcijo vira; zahteva, da se enemu članu osebja v vsaki geografski enoti dodeli dodatna odgovornost za človekove pravice;
Asks the Commission to strengthen the Human Rights Unit in its Directorate General for External Relations, providing for additional personnel to cover all human rights issues, in order to enable it to fulfil its additional function as a resource unit; asks also that one staff member in each geographical unit be given added responsibility for human rights;
V svetu ostaja Evropska unija prvak na področju človekovih pravic, Evropski parlament pa najmočnejši zagovornik človekovih pravic med institucijami EU.
The European Union remains the foremost champion of human rights in the world, and the European Parliament the strongest advocate of human rights amongst the EU institutions.
Vseeno je Evropa boljša pri izdajanju izjav kot pa pri njihovem nadaljnjem izvajanju.
However, Europe is better at issuing statements than in following them up.
Unija lahko izvaja visoko kakovostno delo na področju človekovih pravic, vendar ji v številnih primerih ne uspe posamezno povezati ali vključiti vprašanja človekovih pravic v druge politike in programe.
The Union may undertake high quality work on human rights, yet in many cases singularly fails to integrate or mainstream human rights considerations into its other policies and programmes.
Če resno verjamemo v naše vrednote, se mora to spremeniti.
If we are serious about our values, this has to change.
Letno poročilo Evropskega parlamenta o človekovih pravicah je v preteklosti te težave obravnavalo le simbolno, vsebovalo je pogosto odličen, čeprav delni, komentar kršitev človekovih pravic po svetu, vendar ni nikoli obravnavalo pravega dela Parlamenta: pregledati in beležiti, kaj dela Evropska unija kot celota, da dejansko vpliva na opazovanje človekovih pravic in ga spreminja.
The European Parliament's Annual Human Rights report has been symbolic of these problems in the past, providing an often excellent though partial commentary on human rights violations across the world, but never undertaking the proper job of Parliament: to scrutinize and hold to account what the European Union as a whole does that actually affects and changes the observation of human rights.
Letošnje poročilo s podporo vseh glavnih političnih skupin v parlamentu upošteva ta pristop.
With the support of all of the major political groups in the Parliament, this year's report adopts that approach.
Odgovor na letno poročilo EU o človekovih pravicah v svetu (2005)
A Response to the EU Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2005
Izhodišče mora biti letno poročilo Sveta o človekovih pravicah, ki ima letos naslov poročilo Evropske unije.
The starting point must be the Council's own Annual Human Rights Report, this year titled a report of the European Union.
Takšno enotno poročilo, sestavljeno na podlagi daljšega posvetovanja in predstavljeno z večjo pristojnostjo in širšim seznanjanjem javnosti, je lahko en način, da se Unija glasneje zavzame za človekove pravice v svetu.
Such a single report, drawn together through greater consultation, and presented with greater authority and publicity, can be one way in which the Union can project a stronger voice on human rights in the world.
Od sestave prvega poročila leta 2000 se je kakovost poročila Sveta znatno izboljšala.
There have been major improvements in the quality of the Council's Report since the first report was produced in 2000.
Letošnje poročilo poleg dela Sveta vključuje tudi podatke o delu Komisije in Parlamenta.
This year the report includes information on the work of the Commission and Parliament as well as the Council.
V naslednjem letu se lahko izboljša postopek sestave tistega dela poročila, ki obravnava Parlament, skupaj z večjo zavezanostjo Sveta, da bo uporabil poročilo za odgovor na in upoštevanje resolucij EP.
The procedure through which the section covering the Parliament was produced can be improved for next year, alongside a greater commitment from the Council to use the Report to respond and follow up on EP resolutions.
Jasno je, da primanjkuje analiz, prav tako ni prave presoje vpliva in spremljanja.
There is clearly not enough analysis, no real impact assessment, no monitoring.
Kakšen je bil vpliv demarš ali klavzul o človekovih pravicah?
What was the impact of the demarches, or the human rights clauses?
Nobeno težje vprašanje ni bilo zastavljeno, niti ni nihče skušal najti odgovorov.
No tough questions have been posed, let alone answers sought.
Prav tako se ne omenjajo prednostna področja za delo Sveta v prihodnjem letu.
Equally, there is no mention of the priority areas for the Council over the coming year.
Pobuda, ki bi lahko pomagala pri določanju prednostnih nalog, je, da se v letnem poročilu vsako leto sestavi seznam držav, ki zbujajo posebno skrb.
One initiative that could help with setting priorities would be if the Annual Report identified each year a list of Countries of Particular Concern.
Svet že vodi „nadzorne sezname“, ki se vsakih šest mesecev revidirajo, da se zagotovijo kratke in jedrnate informacije o državah v krizi ali državah, ki jim grozi kriza, da se spodbudijo skupni ukrepi znotraj Sveta ministrov in v zunanji politiki držav članic.
The Council already maintains 'watchlists' which are reviewed every 6 months, with the objective of providing short, succinct information on countries either in or with the potential to fall into crises, to encourage joined-up actions within the Council of Ministers and across Member State foreign policies.
Te informacije se lahko uporabijo za sestavo seznama držav, ki zbujajo posebno skrb, za usmerjanje pozornosti, dokler to ne izključuje ukrepov v državah, ki niso na seznamu.
This information could be used to draw up a CPC list to focus attention, so long as this never precludes action in countries not on the list.
Eno je gotovo – obstaja resna potreba po izboljšanju preglednosti poročila, zlasti s strani novinarjev in nacionalnih parlamentov.
One fact is certain – there is a serious need to improve on the visibility of the report, particularly with journalists and national parliaments.
Delo dveh predsedstev
The conduct of the two Presidencies
S splošnega vidika je bilo luksemburško predsedstvo (januar – junij 2005) uspešno pri spodbujanju in zagovarjanju človekovih pravic, zlasti na 61. seji Komisije ZN za človekove pravice.
Generally speaking, the Luxembourg Presidency (January – June 2005) was a success with regards to promoting and standing up for human rights, notably at the 61 st session of the UN Commission on Human Rights.
To je zlasti posledica omejenih razpoložljivih sredstev, kar je pomenilo, da se je predsedstvo zanašalo na druge države članice, ki so pomagale pri delu in zgodnjih pogajanjih z drugimi.
This is particularly true due to the limited means available, which meant the Presidency was reliant on other Member States practically helping with the workload and negotiating early on with others.
Sistem ekip držav članic, ki pomagajo – „neuradne trojke“ – se ne sme uporabljati le pri predsedovanju manjših držav.
This system of teams of Member States helping - "informal troikas" - should not just be limited to the Presidencies of small countries.
To bi omogočilo večjo količino dela, ki ga lahko opravi EU, ter večje sodelovanje držav članic pri delu Sveta na področju človekovih pravic na splošno.
This would enable an expansion of the amount of work the EU can cover and increase Member State involvement in the Council's work on human rights generally.
Med predsedstvom Združenega kraljestva (julij – december 2005) je bilo doseženih več mejnikov, ki so pomembno vplivali na vprašanje človekovih pravic, zlasti v zvezi s širitvijo.
A number of milestones were reached during the UK Presidency (July - December 2005) which have major human rights implications, particularly concerning enlargement.
Spodbuda za reformo v Turčiji bo še večja zdaj, ko so se začela pogajanja, pri tem je Komisija poudarila pomen spremljanja meril v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami.
The impetus for reform in Turkey will be even greater now that negotiations have started, with the Commission underlining the importance of monitoring human rights criteria.
Med predsedovanjem Združenega kraljestva je bila dana prednost številnim demaršam o smrtni kazni, usmerjenim na države, ki so se odločale, ali naj sprejmejo moratorij na smrtno kazen.
During the UK Presidency, a priority was given to a number of demarches on the death penalty, concentrating on countries that were at the moment undecided over whether or not to call a moratorium.
Skupno je bilo v zadnjem letu več demarš, naslovljenih proti 40 različnim državam.
Overall there were a wide range of demarches, to around 40 different countries over the past year.
Demarš zaradi njihove narave ni mogoče javno objaviti, treba pa bi bilo opraviti presojo vpliva in objaviti rezultate.
By their nature, demarches themselves cannot be made public, but an impact assessment should be made and the results made public.
Prav tako je treba razmisliti, ali je zaupne informacije o demaršah mogoče deliti z izbrano skupino poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, kar se že izvaja pri občutljivih informacijah v zvezi z varnostno politiko.
Consideration also should be given to whether it would be possible to share confidential information on demarches with a select group of MEPs, as already happens with sensitive information concerning Security Policy.
Predsedstvo Združenega kraljestva je prav tako napredovalo pri pritisku na države, kot sta Iran in Kambodža, na področju pravic sindikatov ter ohranilo sankcije EU za Burmo, ko je uspešno pritisnilo na vlado Burme, da je preskočila mandat za predsedovanje združenju ASEAN v letu 2006.
The UK Presidency also made progress in pressing countries such as Iran and Cambodia on trade union rights, and maintained the EU sanctions on Burma, successfully pressuring the Burmese government to skip its turn as ASEAN chair in 2006.
Pripravljene so bile pomembne deklaracije v zvezi z Nepalom, ki so se med letom znatno izboljšale glede kakovosti in uravnoteženosti, zlasti na področju kritike nepalske vlade.
There were notable declarations concerning Nepal, which improved significantly in quality and balance throughout the year, particularly in their criticism of the Nepalese government.
Vseeno so se med predsedovanjem Združenega kraljestva pojavile težave v zvezi s posvetovanjem.
However, there were problems of consultation during the UK Presidency.
Na primer, pojavile so se resne pritožbe v zvezi s sklepi Sveta za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose glede Kolumbije z dne 3. oktobra, ki so bili sprejeti brez predhodnega posvetovanja s civilno družbo, ter v zvezi z neizpolnitvijo obljube, da se v Kolumbijo povabi direktorja Urada visokega komisarja ZN za človekove pravice, da bi pred sprejetjem sklepov nagovoril Svet.
For example, there were serious complaints regarding the October 3 GAERC conclusions on Colombia, following no consultation with civil society, and a failure to fulfil a promise to invite the Director of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Colombia to address the Council prior to agreeing to the conclusions.
ZN poudarja resničen strah, da bo priznavanje prava miru in pravičnosti (pravni okvir za demobilizacijo ilegalnih oboroženih skupin) kot koraka do miru v Kolumbiji, škodovalo zagovornikom človekovih pravic.
There is a real fear, echoed by the UN, that recognition of the Justice and Peace Law (the legal framework for demobilisation of the illegal armed groups) as a step forward towards peace in Colombia will have a detrimental effect on human rights defenders.
Objavljena so bila namreč poročila, da je bilo od sprejetja sklepov ubitih sedem članov Nacionalnega gibanja za žrtve.
There are already reports of seven members of the National Victims’ Movement being killed since the conclusions.
Tega ni bilo nikoli na dnevnem redu delovne skupine Sveta za človekove pravice (COHOM), čeprav neposredno velja za zagovornike človekovih pravic in spodbujanje smernic.
This was never put on the agenda of the Council Working Group on Human Rights (COHOM), despite its direct relevance to human rights defenders and the promotion of the Guidelines.
Med predsedstvom Združenega kraljestva je bila opravljena revizija smernic o otrocih in oboroženih spopadih.
There was a review of the Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict, carried out under the UK Presidency.
Vseeno je skrb vzbujalo stališče predsedstva, „da ni njegova naloga govoriti partnerjem, kaj storiti“.
However, the attitude of the Presidency that ‘it is not its role to tell its partners what to do’ was worrying.
Drugi večji razlog za razočaranje je, da niti delegacije niti nevladne organizacije na terenu niso opravile analize vpliva na otroke.
A second major reason for disappointment was that no child impact analysis was done – either via Delegations or NGOs in the field.
Pravzaprav se za revizijo niso niti posvetovale z lokalnimi delegacijami.
Indeed, local Delegations were not even consulted for this Review.
Razen tega je za smernice potrebna revizija seznama držav, označenih kot prednostne države, predvsem ker v letu 2005 na države, ki jih ni na seznamu, ni bila naslovljena niti ena demarša o otrocih in oboroženih spopadih.
There also needs to be a review of the list of countries labelled priority countries for the purpose of the Guidelines, particularly as not one demarche has been carried out in 2005 on Children and Armed Conflict to a country not on the list.
Na primer območij, kot so palestinska ozemlja, ni na seznamu, vendar je tam vpliv oboroženih spopadov na otroke izjemen.
For example, places such as the Palestinian Territories are not on the list, but the effect of the armed conflict there on children is overwhelming.
V zvezi s smernicami o zagovornikih človekovih pravic so kljub nekaterim prizadevanjem za sprejetje dejanskih korakov za izvajanje smernice na splošno slabo poznane.
Concerning the Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders, despite some efforts at concrete steps towards implementation, the guidelines in general are little known.
Na primer februarja 2005 so nevladne organizacije poskušale urediti srečanje za seznanjanje osebja lokalnih nevladnih organizacij v Ruandi z vsebino smernic.
For example, in February 2005, NGOs attempted to arrange a meeting to promote the Guidelines to local NGO staff in Rwanda.
Vendar delegacija Komisije zaradi političnega ozadja ni želela sodelovati.
However the Commission delegation was reluctant to be involved, because of the political context.
V nasprotju s tem je na srečanju v Burundiju sam ambasador predstavil smernice.
In contrast, in Burundi the Ambassador himself presented the guidelines at the meeting.
Predložena sta bila dva dokumenta s priporočili in predlogi zagovornikov človekovih pravic v Ruandi in Burundiju, vendar ni videti, da bi nadalje ukrepali.
Two documents with recommendations and proposals from human rights defenders in Rwanda and Burundi were submitted, however there does not appear to have been a follow-up.
Obstaja jasna potreba po rednih, uradnih revizijah in presojah vpliva vsake serije smernic, pri tem je treba upoštevati možne nove mehanizme za izboljšanje njihove učinkovitosti, s prispevki in vpogledom Parlamenta, z uporabo najboljše prakse za izboljšanje izvajanja.
There is a clear need to conduct regular, formal reviews and impact assessments on each set of Guidelines, taking into consideration possible new mechanisms to enhance their effectiveness, with input and insight from the Parliament, using ‘best practice’ to improve implementation.
Ključ do bolj učinkovitega sodelovanja Sveta pri vprašanju človekovih pravic je upravljanje delovne skupine Sveta za človekove pravice.
A key to more effective engagement of the Council to human rights issues is the management of COHOM.
V praksi to pomeni, da morajo biti dnevni redi in dokumenti objavljeni pravočasno in pred sejami, da se omogočijo zunanji prispevki.
On a practical level, agendas and documentation should be made available publicly on time and in advance of meetings, so that external input is possible.
Obstaja tudi možnost ustanovitve stalne delovne skupine Sveta za človekove pravice s sedežem v Bruslju ali, če je to neizvedljivo, imenovanja posebnega uradnika za človekove pravice v vsakem stalnem predstavništvu.
There is also a case for a standing Brussels-based COHOM, or if this is unachievable to at least having a dedicated human rights officer in each Permanent Representation.
Isto velja tudi za srečanja s predstavniki in obiske tretjih držav – na primer obiski trojk, srečanja na vrhu, pridružitveni sveti in seje Komisije.
The same is true for meetings with representatives and visits to third countries – for example troika visits, summit meetings, Association Councils and Commission meetings.
Dnevni redi morajo biti na voljo vnaprej, da se omogoči posvetovanje, razen tega je treba javno objaviti poročila o obiskih.
Agendas should be available in advance, to enable consultation, and reports of visits should be made public.
Od luksemburškega predsedstva se pripravljajo seznami človekovih pravic z namenom izboljšanja informativnih obiskov in srečanj s tretjimi državami.
Human Rights Fact Sheets have been drafted since the Luxembourg Presidency with the aim of better briefing visits and meetings with third countries.
Ti seznami so zelo pozitivna pobuda; dopolnjujejo se le enkrat na leto in so zdaj zaupni.
These Fact Sheets are a highly positive initiative; however, they are only updated once a year, and are currently confidential.
Število in pomembnost misij EVOP sta vse večja, prav tako postaja varstvo človekovih pravic vse bolj pomembno.
As ESDP missions grow in number and in importance, safeguarding human rights is becoming more and more important.