natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalec torej ugotavlja, da Komisija za program Fiscalis 2013 zahteva pretirano povečanje v višini 156,9 milijona EUR, ki doseže celo 162 milijonov EUR, če vključimo EMCS (v primerjavi z manj kot 100 milijoni EUR za leto 2007, vključno z EMCS), vendar meni, da je edina ustrezna rešitev ponovna vzpostavitev obstoječega proračuna.
So your rapporteur, while noting that the Commission is calling for an exorbitant increase to EUR 156.9 million for the Fiscalis 2013 budget – EUR 162 million if one includes EMCS (as compared to less than EUR 100 million for 2007, including EMCS) – considers the only appropriate solution is to reinstate the existing budget.
Komisija na drugi strani meni, da je treba skoraj podvojiti, na primer, odhodke za delovne obiske in seminarje.
The Commission, on the other hand, thinks that the expenditure on working visits and seminars, for example, should be almost doubled.
In vendar celo Evropska konfederacija neodvisnih sindikatov ugotavlja, da "zlasti na področju davkov pogosto zija prepad med teorijo in prakso" ter da se "seminarji, na katerih sodeluje visoko kvalificirano osebje, pogosto izogibajo s prakso povezanim temam", in zato poziva, naj bodo seminarji bolj usmerjeni k dejanski praksi.
And yet even the European Confederation of Independent Trade Unions notes that “particularly in the tax field, there is often a yawning gap between theory and practice, and seminars involving highly-qualified staff often disregard issues relating to practice”, and therefore calls for seminars to be geared more closely to actual practice.
Med izmenjavo mnenj v pristojnem odboru je tudi večina poročevalcev v senci drugih političnih skupin opozorila na razsipavanje in "konferenčni turizem".
In the exchange of views in the committee responsible, most of the shadow rapporteurs of the other political groups also warned against waste and “conference tourism”.
Komisija poziva tudi k "zagotovitvi" 18,8 milijona EUR za razvoj sistemov IT, čeprav je trenutno popolnoma nemogoče predvideti takšen razvoj, in 45,3 milijona EUR (v primerjavi s sedanjega 18,5 milijona EUR) za mrežo CCN/CSI.
The Commission also calls for a “provision" of EUR 18.8 million for new developments in IT systems – even though such developments are at present completely impossible to predict – and EUR 45.3 million (as against EUR 18.5 million at present) for the CCN/CSI network.
Vaš poročevalec ne more razumeti, zakaj je eden ali drugi predlog potreben.
Your rapporteur is unable to see why either of these are necessary.
Na drugi strani, predlogi sprememb vašega poročevalca zahtevajo vsestransko preglednost v zvezi z dejavnostmi in izdatki v okviru programa Fiscalis 2013.
On the other hand, your rapporteur’s amendments urge comprehensive transparency in connection with activities and expenditure under Fiscalis 2013.
Zamisel za pobudo Fiscalis izhaja iz prejšnjih dejavnosti, in sicer iz programa Matthaeus-Tax iz leta 1993
The idea of the Fiscalis initiative came from earlier activities, namely the Matthaeus-Tax programme of 1993
Usklajen razvoj, izvajanje enotnih shem usposabljanja ter izmenjava dobrih praks bi morali prispevati k boljšemu razumevanju prava Skupnosti med davčnimi organi držav članic.
Coordinated development and implementation of a common training scheme and exchange of good practice should contribute to better understanding of Community law amongst the fiscal authorities of the Member States.
Zdelo se je, da je povezovanje obstoječih in do tedaj neusklajenih praks v skupen okvir ključnega pomena.
Bringing the hitherto existing practices, subject to no real co-ordination, into a common framework seemed crucial.
Fiscalis 2013 je tretja "izdaja" programa, ki nadomešča program Fiscalis 2007, uveden z odločbo iz leta 1998 o vzpostavitvi programa Skupnosti za izboljšanje sistemov posredne obdavčitve
Fiscalis 2013 is the third ‘edition’ of the programme to replace the Fiscalis 2007, introduced by the Decision of 1998 establishing a programme of Community action to ameliorate the indirect taxation systems
Cilji programa Fiscalis 2013
Objectives of the Fiscalis 2013 programme
Program Fiscalis 2013 je šestletni program, ki je usklajen s finančno perspektivo 2007–2013.
Fiscalis 2013 programme is a six year programme, aligned with the Financial Perspectives 2007 – 2013.
Ostali dve spremembi sta vključitev sistema za nadzor gibanja trošarin (EMCS), ki je bil vzpostavljen za spremljanje gibanja trošarinskih izdelkov in namenjanje večje pozornosti boju proti davčnim goljufijam.
Other modifications are the inclusion of the Excise Movement Control System (EMCS) established to monitor movement of excisable products and greater emphasis on combating tax fraud.
Poglavitni cilj programa 2013 bo tudi v prihodnje pomagati davčnim upravam v Evropi pri podpori in izboljšanju delovanja davčnih sistemov.
The main objective of the 2013 programme will remain assisting the European tax administrations to sustain and improve the functioning of the tax systems.
Program se bo osredotočil na spodbujanje sodelovanja med davčnimi upravami zaradi povečanja dohodka, vendar bi se obenem moral izogniti odvečnim birokratskim postopkom.
It will focus on stimulating cooperation between them in order to raise revenue but should avoid red tape at the same time.
Ena od glavnih prednostnih nalog bo tudi podpora uvedbi novega vseevropskega računalniškega sistema za informacije o obdavčljivih transakcijah.
One of its main priorities will also be support for the introduction of the new trans-European computerised system of information on taxable transactions.
Uradni cilji programa Fiscalis 2013 so:
Official objectives of Fiscalis 2013 are:
- povečanje poznavanja s pomočjo vseevropskega foruma za izmenjavo mnenj, informacij, "namigov" za praktično uporabo itd. med davčnimi organi;
- increased knowledge via pan-European forum for exchange of opinions, information, practical application ‘tips’, etc. between the tax authorities;
- okrepljen boj proti davčnim goljufijam ter nezakoniti trgovini s krepitvijo upravnega sodelovanja in vzajemne pomoči (nov zakonodajni program za lažjo izmenjavo informacij je že pripravljen
- enhanced fight against tax fraud and illegitimate trade by strengthening administrative co-operation and mutual assistance (the new legal programme facilitating information exchange is already in place
Uredba ES 1789(2003) z dne 7. oktobra 2003 ) in boljša organizacija davčnega nadzora z uporabo seznamov dobrih praks, ki so jih že pripravile države članice, ter računalniških informacijskih sistemov;
EC Regulation 1789(2003) of 7 October 2003 ) and improving the organisation of tax controls thanks to the list of good practices already drafted by the Member States and computerised systems of information;
- zmanjšanje birokratskih postopkov za davčne zavezance z iskanjem najboljšega ravnovesja med nadzorom in upravnim bremenom, kot je bilo npr. storjeno z uvedbo sistema VIES (sistem izmenjave podatkov s področja DDV) na spletu;
- the cutting of the red-tape for taxable persons by looking at the optimal balance between controls and administrative burden such as it happened with the introduction of the VIES (VAT Identification Exchange System) to the Internet;
- vzpostavitev podobnega sodelovanja z davčnimi upravami tretjih držav, saj davčne goljufije ne poznajo meja.
- establishing similar co-operation with tax administrations from third countries as tax fraud knows no borders.
Vaš poročevalec opozarja na dejstvo, da je obravnavani predlog eden od neštetih programov, ki si prizadevajo za izboljšanje delovanja notranjega trga.
Your Rapporteur brings your attention to the fact that the discussed proposal is one of the innumerable programmes seeking to improve the functioning of the internal market.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da ti programi ne smejo postati sami sebi namen.
However, it needs to be remembered that these programmes must not become an end in themselves.
Gotovo je treba pričakovati, da so cilji programa, določeni leta 1993, do sedaj že doseženi – in ne bi se jih smelo obnavljati iz leta v leto.
Surely one should expect programme objectives set in 1993 to have been achieved by now: they should not need to be permanently renewed.
Milijoni evropskih državljanov upravičeno kritizirajo dejstvo, da veliko programov EU ne služi več nobenemu jasnemu namenu, razen da opravičujejo obstoj birokratskega aparata, ter da je porabljeni znesek popolnoma nesorazmeren z doseženim ciljem.
Millions of European citizens rightly criticise the fact that many EU programmes no longer serve any obvious purpose other than to justify the existence of the bureaucratic apparatus, and that the amount spent is totally disproportionate to the end achieved.
K temu je treba dodati dejstvo, da vaš poročevalec ni nikoli, kljub večkratnim zahtevam, prejel drugih obljubljenih informacij, in situacija postane jasna.
Add to this the fact that your rapporteur never received other promised information, in spite of repeated requests, and a pattern begins to emerge.
Vaš poročevalec je poleg tega zaman čakal več tednov zgolj, da se mu sporočijo imena novih uradnikov, pristojnih med nemškim predsedstvom.
Your rapporteur also waited in vain for several weeks just to be told the names of new officials responsible under the German Presidency.
Poročevalec zato ne more soglašati z mnenjem, da so se izkušnje, ki so jih prispevale dosedanje določbe programa Fiscalis, izkazale za še kako učinkovite pri povezovanju davčnih uradnikov iz različnih državnih uprav pri skupnih dejavnostih in izpolnjevanju zastavljenih ciljev.
The rapporteur therefore cannot share the opinion that the experience gained from the hitherto provisions under Fiscalis programme proved all too efficient in bringing tax officials from different national administrations together in professional activities and to meet the set objectives.
Gotovo se ne zdi primerno zmanjšati programa, vendar je treba strogo preveriti nove predlagane cilje.
It does not seem appropriate to axe the programme, but the proposed new objectives should be subjected to rigorous examination.
Potrebno je tudi preučiti, ali obstajajo prekrivanja z drugimi programi.
We also need to look at whether there are any overlaps with other programmes.
Na primer, pospeševanje boja proti korupciji je večkrat navedeno kot razlog za zahtevano, pretirano povečanje proračuna, vendar ni nikjer pojasnjeno, ne v posebnih predlaganih projektih, ne v zadevnih odgovorih uradnikov Sveta in Komisije, koliko bo to dejansko stalo.
For example, stepping up the fight against corruption is repeatedly given as a reason for the desired exorbitant increase in the budget, but it is nowhere stated, either in the specific projects proposed or in the relevant Council and Commission officials' answers, how much this will actually cost.
Vendar je potrebno preprečiti, da se dodatna sredstva porabijo pod pretvezo priljubljene skrbi javnosti – boja proti korupciji, za namene, ki so končno večinoma birokratski.
We need to prevent additional funding being spent under the cloak of a popular public concern – the fight against corruption – for ends which are in the last analysis mainly bureaucratic.
Dejansko bi vaš poročevalec odobraval, če bi nove države članice in tretje države tesneje sodelovale v tem smislu, zlasti v boju poti korupciji.
In fact, your rapporteur would welcome it if the new Member States and third countries were to become more closely involved in this way, particularly in combating corruption.
Vendar se tudi tukaj izjave pristojnih uradnikov in njihov dozdevni priljubljeni cilj ne ujemajo.
However, here too there is a mismatch between the statements by the officials responsible and their ostensible popular objective.
Le nepomemben delež zahtevanega pretiranega povečanja proračuna je namreč dejansko namenjen pospeševanju sodelovanja tretjih držav.
Only an insignificant proportion of the requested exorbitant budget increase will in fact be going to step up involvement by third countries.
Končno, zahteva vašega poročevalca, da se proračunska sredstva razdelijo v skladu z regionalnimi prednostnimi nalogami, tudi ni bila izpolnjena.
Finally, your rapporteur’s request, that the budget should be divided up according to regional priorities, has also not been complied with.
Poročevalec zato meni, da ni nujno, da program predstavlja dosledno strategijo za reševanje novih izzivov, kot so skupna konsolidirana davčna osnova za gospodarske družbe, obdavčenje po pravilih matične države, revizija direktive o izdajanju računov v letu 2008 ali zadnje širitve EU, saj ni dvoma, da grožnje, zlasti hitro razvijajoče se nove oblike davčnih goljufij in nezakonite trgovine, ki izkrivljajo delovanje notranjega trga, negativno vplivajo na zaposlovanje in zmanjšujejo zaupanje v davčne sisteme Skupnosti.
The Rapporteur takes therefore the view that the programme does not necessarily constitute a coherent strategy to provide a response to the new challenges, such as the Common Consolidated Company Tax Base (CCCTB), Home State Taxation, revision of the Invoicing Directive in 2008 or the most recent EU enlargements; whereas there is no doubt that threats, in particular quickly developing new tax fraud and illegitimate trade patterns distorting the functioning of the Internal Market, have their adverse impact on employment and undermine confidence in the Community’s fiscals systems.
Vendar prav na tem področju niso bili oblikovani nobeni prepričljivi predlogi v okviru programa za reševanje teh izzivov ali pa ti predlogi sodijo pod okrilje drugih dejavnosti EU.
However, no convincing proposals have been made under the programme to meet these challenges, or else they come under the auspices of other EU activities.
Pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja pobudo Komisije o nadaljevanju in okrepitvi programa Fiscalis do leta 2013.
The Commission proposal to continue the Fiscalis programme to 2013 and to strengthen it is extremely welcome.
To je v skladu z dolgoletnimi prizadevanji Odbora za proračun in njegovega poročevalca, da se ozavesti problem goljufij na področju DDV.
It is entirely consistent with the efforts which the Committee on Budgets and your draftsman have made over many years to increase awareness of the problem of VAT fraud.
Poleg tega je bila Komisija že pred začetkom obsežnega posvetovanja o reviziji davčnih predpisov Skupnosti pozvana, da pripravi študijo o goljufijah na področju DDV in možnih ukrepih.
In addition, the Commission was asked to draw up a study into VAT fraud and possible measures to combat it, even before the start of the broad consultations on a revision of Community tax provisions.
Fiscalis 2007–2013 je program Skupnosti za izboljšanje sodelovanja finančnih organov držav članic in delovanja sistemov obdavčitve.
Fiscalis 2007-2013 is a Community programme which seeks to improve cooperation among the Member States' financial authorities and the operation of taxation systems.
Njegov glavni cilj je izboljšanje delovanja notranjega trga (predlog odločbe temelji na členu 95 Pogodbe.)
The overarching objective is the improved operation of the internal market, and the proposal for a decision is indeed based on Article 95 of the Treaty.
Vrste davkov, ki jih program zajema, so: DDV, trošarine, davek na dohodek in kapital, davek na zavarovalne premije.
The programme covers the following forms of taxation: VAT, excise duties, taxes on income and capital and taxes on insurance premiums.
Skupnost bo tako lahko financirala več ukrepov za izpolnitev omenjenega cilja, na primer:
It is intended to enable the Community to fund a variety of measures with the aim of improving the operation of taxation systems, such as:
– boljšo infrastrukturo: strojno in programsko opremo ter omrežno povezavo (člen 6),
- improved infrastructure: hardware and software and the networking of systems (Article 6)
– ukrepe za izboljšanje poznavanja zakonodaje Skupnosti med nacionalnimi davčnimi uradniki (seminarji, projektne skupine) (člen 8),
- measures to improve knowledge of Community law among national tax officials (seminars, project groups) (Article 8)
– delovne obiske za finančne uradnike (člen 9),
- working visits for financial officials (Article 9)
– usposabljanja (člen 10).
- training activities (Article 10).
Finančni okvir: Poročevalec predlaga, da se za program nameni dodatnih 19,95 milijona EUR ter s tem ustrezno okrepi boj zlasti proti goljufijam na področju DDV.
Funding : Your draftsman is proposing that an additional € 19.95 m should be made available for the programme, so that the fight against VAT fraud in particular can be given an appropriate boost.
Vsak euro, ki ga nekdo utaji, oškoduje poštene davkoplačevalce ter zmanjšuje njihovo zaupanje v nacionalne in evropske institucije.
Every euro which is defrauded penalises honest taxpayers and undermines their confidence in national and European institutions.
Navedeni znesek naj se nameni izboljšanju infrastrukture informacijske tehnologije, to je sistemu izmenjave podatkov o DDV in trošarinah (SIPDDV in EMCS).
This sum is to be used to improve IT infrastructure, i.e. the VAT and excise duty information exchange systems (MIAS and EMCS).
Subvencioniranje infrastrukture: Program predvideva subvencioniranje razvoja infrastrukture, potrebne za usposabljanje.
Infrastructure development : The programme provides for funding for the development of the infrastructure required for training activities.
Ta možnost, ki je za države članice nedvomno zelo privlačna, krši proračunsko načelo specialnosti, ker infrastruktur (učilnice, avtobusi itd.) ni mogoče uporabiti le za en sam namen.
This arrangement, which is no doubt very attractive to the Member States, would appear to breach the principle of budgetary specificity, since infrastructure (classrooms, buses, etc.) can naturally be used for a variety of purposes.
Zato je treba pojasniti, da gre lahko le za računalniško infrastrukturo.
It must therefore be made clear that infrastructure can mean only IT infrastructure.
Druge dejavnosti: Možnost subvencioniranja „drugih dejavnosti, potrebnih za uresničevanje ciljev programa,“ je zelo široko opredeljena.
Other activities : The provision that 'any other activities required for the realisation of the objectives of the programme' may be funded is very vaguely worded.
Z uvedbo zgornje odstotne meje za skupno subvencioniranje bo mogoče ohraniti prožnost programa, ne da bi bile pri tem ogrožene druge naloge.
A ceiling, in the form of a percentage of overall funding, will ensure that the programme retains its flexibility, without endangering other activities.
Finančni nadzor: Izrecno je treba omogočiti, da se nadzor ne izvaja le na kraju samem, ampak tudi nenapovedano.
Financial control : Clear provision should be made for carrying out audits not only on the spot, but also without prior notice.
Postopek komitologije: Tudi pri programu, ki je namenjen predvsem podpori držav članic, vendar izvaja politiko EU in se financira iz proračuna EU, Svet ne sme imeti prednosti pred Parlamentom, kadar gre za določitev delovnega programa.
Comitology procedure : Even in the case of a programme which is primarily intended to provide support for the Member States, although it does implement EU policy and is funded from the EU budget, the Council should not be at an advantage vis-à-vis Parliament when it comes to establishing the work programme.
Zato je posvetovalni odbor primernejši od upravljalnega.
For that reason, an advisory committee would be a more suitable arrangement than a management committee.
Prav tako ni mogoče izstaviti bianko čeka za „vse potrebne ukrepe v zvezi z upravljanjem proračuna programa“ in teh ukrepov prepustiti nepreglednemu postopku komitologije.
By the same token, there can be no question of giving the Commission a free hand to adopt 'any necessary measures for the budget management of the programme' by means of the comitology procedure, which is anything but transparent.
Če povzamemo, lahko rečemo, da so cilji programa povsem skladni z dolgoletnimi prizadevanji za povečanje ozaveščenosti glede problema goljufij na področju DDV in izboljšanje potrebnega sodelovanje organov držav članic, da bi tako dosegli boljše delovanje notranjega trga v korist vseh, vključno s proračunom EU.
To sum up, the objectives of the programme can be said to be entirely consistent with the efforts made over many years to increase awareness of the problem of VAT fraud, to improve the vital cooperation among the authorities of the Member States and, in this way, to contribute to the more effective operation of the internal market, to the benefit of everyone, and the EU budget.
Kljub temu je treba finančna sredstva in preglednost postopka izboljšati z nekaterimi predlogi sprememb.
However, amendments are needed to improve the funding arrangements and the transparency of the procedures.
Na žalost je tudi redakcija slaba, zato je treba popraviti vsaj največje napake v pomanjkljivih jezikovnih različicah.
Unfortunately, the drafting also leaves much to be desired and the most serious errors at least need to be put right in the language versions which display shortcomings.
Odbor za proračun poziva Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(1) Glavni cilj Skupnosti v naslednjih letih je doseči rast in delovna mesta, kakor je določeno v okviru obnovljene lizbonske strategije.
(1) The major objectives for the Community over the next years are to create growth and jobs , as laid down in the re-launch of the Lisbon strategy.
Odločba št. 888/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. marca 1998 o vzpostavitvi programa Skupnosti za izboljšanje sistemov posredne obdavčitve na notranjem trgu (Program Fiscalis) (v nadaljnjem besedilu „program 2002“) in Odločba št. 2235/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. decembra 2002 o sprejetju programa Skupnosti za boljše delovanje davčnih sistemov na notranjem trgu (Program Fiscalis 2003–2007) (v nadaljnjem besedilu „program 2007“) sta pomembno prispevali k doseganju navedenih ciljev v obdobju od leta 1998 do 2002 in od 2003 do 2007.
Decision No 888/98/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 30 March 1998 establishing a programme of Community action to ameliorate the indirect taxation systems of the internal market (Fiscalis programme) (hereinafter 'the 2002 programme') and Decision No 2235/2002/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 3 December 2002 adopting a Community programme to improve the operation of taxation systems in the internal market (Fiscalis 2003 – 2007) (hereinafter 'the 2007 programme') have significantly contributed to the achievement of those objectives for the periods 1998 to 2002 and 2003 to 2007.
Ta program bi moral biti vzpostavljen za obdobje šestih let, da bi bilo trajanje programa usklajeno s trajanjem večletnega finančnega okvira, vključenega v Medinstitucionalni sporazum (vnesti datum) med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju.
This programme should be established for a period of six years to align its duration with that of the Multi-Annual Financial Framework contained in the Inter-institutional agreement of (date to be inserted) between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management.
Ta program bi moral biti vzpostavljen za obdobje šestih let, da bi bilo trajanje programa usklajeno s trajanjem večletnega finančnega okvira, vključenega v medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju.
This programme should be established for a period of six years to align its duration with that of the Multi-Annual Financial Framework contained in the Inter-institutional agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management.