natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za okvirni program in posebne programe se opravijo vmesna in končna vrednotenja vidikov, kot so ustreznost, koherentnost in sinergije, uspešnost, učinkovitost, trajnost in uporabnost.
The Framework Programme and its specific programmes shall be subject to interim and final evaluations which shall examine issues such as relevance, coherence and synergies, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and utility.
Kadar je mogoče, se pri takšnem vrednotenju dejavnosti programa obravnavajo z vidika enakosti spolov in spoštovanja načela nediskriminacije.
Where possible, such evaluations shall examine the gender dimension and the respect of the principle of non discrimination in programme activities.
Prim. predlog spremembe 13.
cf amendment 13.
(a) dostopa do financ za začetek in razvoj MSP ter za naložbe v inovacijske dejavnosti, vključno z ekološkimi inovacijami , ki bi vključeval tudi mlade podjetnike in podjetnice ;
(a) access to finance, including access by young entrepreneurs, both male and female , for the start-up and growth of SMEs and investment in innovation activities, including eco-innovation;
Podjetništvo mladih ljudi je treba spodbujati tudi z enakim dostopom do financ za zagon svojih podjetij.
Young people's entrepreneurship should be encouraged including through equal access to finance for the start-up of their enterprises.
Člen 10, odstavek 2, točka d
Article 10, paragraph 2, point (d)
(d) podjetništva in inovacijske kulture ob upoštevanju vidika enakosti spolov ;
(d) entrepreneurship and innovation culture , taking into account the gender dimension ;
Člen 26, odstavek 2, točka c
Article 26, paragraph 2, point (c)
(c) razvoj inkluzivne informacijske družbe ter učinkovitejših in uspešnejših storitev na področjih javnega interesa in izboljšanje kakovosti življenja.
(c) development of an inclusive information society and more efficient and effective services in areas of public interest, and improvement of the quality of life.
(c) razvoj inkluzivne informacijske družbe ter učinkovitejših in uspešnejših storitev na področjih javnega interesa in izboljšanje kakovosti življenja z upoštevanjem vidika enakosti spolov .
(c) development of an inclusive information society and more efficient and effective services in areas of public interest, and improvement of the quality of life , taking into account the gender dimension .
Člen 27, točka b
Article 27, point (b)
(b) izboljšanju pogojev za razvoj digitalnih vsebin s posebnim poudarkom na večjezičnosti , enakosti spolov in kulturni raznolikosti;
(b) improving the conditions for the development of digital content with a special emphasis on multilingualism , gender equality and cultural diversity;
Pri razvoju digitalnih vsebin je treba poudarek dati tudi enakosti spolov, saj uporabnost vključuje vidik enakosti spolov.
Concerning the development of digital content emphasis must also be put on gender equality, as usability has a gender dimension.
Člen 28, točka a
Article 28, point (a)
(a) pospeševanju inovativnosti v postopkih, storitvah in proizvodih, ki jih omogočajo IKT, zlasti pri MSP in javnih storitvah, ob upoštevanju potrebnih zahtev po znanju;
(a) promoting innovation in processes, services and products enabled by ICTs, in particular in SMEs and public services, taking into account the necessary skills requirements;
(a) pospeševanju inovativnosti v postopkih, storitvah in proizvodih, ki jih omogočajo IKT, zlasti pri MSP in javnih storitvah, ob upoštevanju potrebnih zahtev po znanju in digitalnega razkoraka med moškimi in ženskami ;
(a) promoting innovation in processes, services and products enabled by ICTs, in particular in SMEs and public services, taking into account the necessary skills requirements and the digital gap between men and women ;
Dostopnost žensk do informacijsko komunikacijskih tehnologij še vedno predstavlja problem, zlasti na trgu delovne sile ter pri malih in srednje velikih podjetjih.
Women's accessibility to ICT remains problematic, in particular in the labour market and especially as regards SMEs.
(c) izboljšanju kakovosti, učinkovitosti in razpoložljivosti elektronskih storitev na področjih javnega interesa in participacije, ki jo omogočajo IKT, vključno z interoperabilnimi vseevropskimi ali čezmejnimi javnimi storitvami in razvojem gradnikov skupnih interesov in izmenjavi dobrih praks.
(c) improving the quality, efficiency and availability of electronic services in areas of public interest and for ICT enabled participation, including interoperable pan-European or cross border public services as well as the development of common interest building blocks and sharing good practices.
(c) izboljšanju dostopnosti, kakovosti, učinkovitosti in razpoložljivosti elektronskih storitev na področjih javnega interesa in participacije, ki jo omogočajo IKT, vključno z interoperabilnimi vseevropskimi ali čezmejnimi javnimi storitvami in razvojem gradnikov skupnih interesov in izmenjavi dobrih praks.
(c) improving the accessibility, quality, efficiency and availability of electronic services in areas of public interest and for ICT enabled participation, including interoperable pan-European or cross border public services as well as the development of common interest building blocks and sharing good practices.
Izboljšati je treba dostop do elektronskih storitev na področjih javnega interesa, da se prepreči izključenost nekaterih oseb iz teh javnih storitev zato, ker nimajo dostopa do elektronskih storitev.
Access to electronic services in areas of public interest should also be improved in order to avoid that some persons be excluded from these public services because they do not have access to electronic services .
Člen 38, točka c
Article 38, point (c)
(c) odstranjevanje netehnoloških ovir za učinkovite in inteligentne načine proizvodnje in porabe energije s spodbujanjem vzpostavitve institucij in kadrov, vključno z lokalno in regionalno ravnijo, z ozaveščanjem, predvsem z izobraževalnim sistemom, s spodbujanjem izmenjav izkušenj in znanja med glavnimi zadevnimi strankami, gospodarstvom in državljani na splošno ter s spodbujanjem razširjanja najboljših praks in najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij, predvsem s pospeševanjem na ravni Skupnosti.
(c) removing the non-technological barriers to efficient and intelligent patterns of energy production and consumption by promoting institutional capacity building including the local and regional level, by raising awareness, notably through the educational system, by encouraging exchanges of experience and know-how among the main players concerned, business and citizens in general and by stimulating the spread of best practices and best available technologies, notably by means of promotion at Community level.
(c) odstranjevanje netehnoloških ovir za učinkovite in inteligentne načine proizvodnje in porabe energije s spodbujanjem vzpostavitve institucij in kadrov, vključno z lokalno in regionalno ravnijo, z ozaveščanjem in upoštevanjem vidika enakosti spolov , predvsem z izobraževalnim sistemom, s spodbujanjem izmenjav izkušenj in znanja med glavnimi zadevnimi strankami, gospodarstvom in državljani na splošno ter s spodbujanjem razširjanja najboljših praks in najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij, predvsem s pospeševanjem na ravni Skupnosti.
(c) removing the non-technological barriers to efficient and intelligent patterns of energy production and consumption by promoting institutional capacity building including the local and regional level, by raising awareness and taking into account the gender dimension , notably through the educational system, by encouraging exchanges of experience and know-how among the main players concerned, business and citizens in general and by stimulating the spread of best practices and best available technologies, notably by means of promotion at Community level.
Predlog Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013)
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 2/2006 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006
on Draft amending budget No 2/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 2/2006 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, Oddelek III – Komisija
on Draft amending budget No 2/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III – Commission
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti predzadnjega pododstavka člena 272(4) te pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 272(4), penultimate subparagraph, thereof,
1. , zlasti členov 37 in 38 te uredbe,
1. , and in particular Articles 37 and 38 thereof,
UL L 78, 15.3.2006. ,
OJ L 78, 15.3.2006. ,
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
– ob upoštevanju Predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna št. 2/2006 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, ki ga je Komisija predložila dne 12. aprila 2006 ( SEC(2006)0490 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 2/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, which the Commission presented on 12 April 2006 ( SEC(2006)0490 ),
– ob upoštevanju Predloga spremembe proračuna št. 2/2006, ki ga je Svet pripravil 21. aprila 2006 (8513/2006 – C6-0127/2006 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 2/2006, which the Council established on 21 April 2006 (8513/2006 – C6‑0127/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6-0181/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0181/2006 ),
A. ker je namen Predloga spremembe proračuna št. 2/2006 v proračun za leto 2006 vključiti presežek sredstev iz leta 2005, ki znašajo 2.410 milijonov evrov;
A. whereas Draft amending budget No 2/2006 aims to enter in the 2006 budget the surplus of the 2005 exercise, amounting to EUR 2 410 million;
B. ker sta dva ključna elementa tega presežka previsoka vknjižba prihodkov v višini 1.292 milijonov evrov in neporabljena sredstva pri odhodkih v višini 1.077 milijonov evrov;
B. whereas the two main elements of this surplus are an over-registering in revenue of EUR 1 292 million and an under-spending in expenditure of EUR 1 077 million;
C. ker so se neporabljena sredstva odobritev plačil v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti skupno znižala za približno 1 % celotnega proračuna, tj. le 1.077 milijonov evrov celotnega proračuna EU za leto 2005 v višini 105.684.048.940 evrov ni bilo porabljenih;
C. whereas the under-spending of payment appropriations, compared to the years before, has decreased overall to about 1% of the budget, i.e. only EUR 1 077 million of the total EU 2005 budget of EUR 105 684 048 940 were not used;
D. ker so neporabljena sredstva za kmetijstvo znašala 157 milijonov evrov ali 0,3 % od 48.510 evrov, za strukturne sklade 58 milijonov evrov (0,2 %) od skupaj 32.641 milijonov evrov, za zunanje ukrepe so znašala 181 milijonov evrov (3,5 %) od skupaj 5.171 milijonov evrov, za upravo 66 milijonov evrov (1,0 %) od skupaj 6.292 milijonov evrov in za predpristopno strategijo 463 milijonov evrov (13,5 %) od skupaj 3.428 milijonov evrov;
D. whereas for agriculture, the sum not spent amounted to EUR 157 million, or 0,3%, of EUR 48 510 million, for structural funding it was EUR 58 million (0,2%) of a total EUR 32 641 million, for external action it amounted to EUR 181 million (3,5%) of the total allowance of EUR 5 171 million, for administration it was EUR 66 million (1,0%) of a total EUR 6 292 million and for pre-accession strategy it amounted to EUR 463 million (13,5%) of a total of EUR 3 428 million;
E. ker so bile v primerjavi z letom 2004 opravljene občutne izboljšave v porabi razporejenih sredstev na področju strukturnih skladov in tega leta ni bilo porabljenih 232 milijonov evrov ali 0,7 % celotnega proračuna v višini 34.451 milijonov evrov, ter na področju notranje politike, kjer ni bilo porabljenih 50 milijonov evrov (0,7 %) od skupnih 7.432 milijonov evrov;
E. whereas, compared to 2004, there have been considerable general improvements in the uptake of allocations in the fields of structural funds, where in 2004, EUR 232 million or 0,7% of the total budget of EUR 34 451 million were not spent, and internal policies, where an amount of EUR 50 million (0,7%) of a total of EUR 7 432 million was left unused in 2004;
F. ker je še vedno dovolj prostora za izboljšave, predvsem na področju zunanjih ukrepov, kjer ni bilo porabljenih 181 milijonov evrov, kar znaša 3,5 % sredstev, namenjenih temu področju v letu 2005, in na področju predpristopne strategije, kjer so se neporabljena sredstva v primerjavi z letom 2004 povišala do 463 milijonov evrov ali 13,5 % načrtovanih sredstev;
F. whereas there is still some room for improvement, especially in the field of external action, where EUR 181 million equalling 3,5% of the total allowance were not spent in 2005, and in pre-accession strategy where the amount unused, compared to 2004, has actually gone up to EUR 463 million or 13,5% of the allowance initially planned;
Pričujoče poročilo obravnava presežek, ki izhaja iz izvrševanja proračuna za leto 2005.
The present report deals with the surplus resulting from the implementation of the budget for 2005.
Presežek iz leta 2005, ki se vknjiži kot prihodek v proračun za leto 2006, znaša
The surplus from 2005 to be entered as revenue in the 2006 budget amounts to
2.410.079.591,35 evrov in je sestavljen iz:
EUR 2 410 079 591.35 and consists of the following components:
1. previsoke vknjižbe prihodkov v višini + 1.292.374.750,19 evrov
1. an over-registering in revenue of + EUR 1 292 374 750.19
2. neporabljena sredstva na strani odhodkov v višini + 1.076.780.696,79 evrov in
2. an under-spending in expenditure of + EUR 1 076 780 696.79 and
3. negativnega salda denarne menjave v višini –40.924.144,37 evrov.
3. a negative balance of monetary exchange of ‑ EUR 40 924 144.37.
Vključevanje presežka iz leta 2005 v proračun bo zato znižalo celotni prispevek držav članic pri financiranju proračuna EU za leto 2006.
The budgeting of the surplus of 2005 will diminish accordingly the global contribution of the Member States to the financing of the EU Budget 2006.
Razdeljen bo na sledeč način (v milijonih evrov):
It will be distributed in the following way (figures in EUR million):
Presežek proračuna 2005
Surplus of the 2005 budget
Slovaška republika
Slovak Republic
Skupni znesek 112.076 milijonov evrov odobritev plačil v proračunu za leto 2006 tako sedaj financirajo države članice s prispevki v višini 108.368 milijonov evrov, 2.410 milijonov evrov izhaja iz presežka iz leta 2005, 1.298 milijonov evrov pa iz drugih sredstev.
In consequence, the total EUR 112 076 million payment appropriations in the 2006 budget are now financed by EUR 108 368 million from Member States' contributions, EUR 2 410 million from surplus rolled-over from 2005 and EUR 1 298 million from other revenue resources.
Na celotno znižanje prispevkov držav članice bodo vplivali še najnovejša napoved lastnih sredstev, vključno s posodobljenim zneskom britanskega popravka in presežek iz jamstvenega sklada za tuja posojila.
The global decrease of contributions by Member State will be further influenced by the updated own resources forecast including the updated amount of the UK correction and the budgeting of the surplus of the guarantee fund for external loans.
Te napovedi bodo tema ločenega predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna, ki ga bo Komisija predstavila v začetku junija 2006 in ki bo še nadalje spremenil zneske prispevkov držav.
These forecasts will be the subject of a separate Preliminary Draft Amending Budget, to be presented by the Commission at the beginning of June 2006, which is expected to change further the amounts of the contributions by country.
Če sodimo po presežku proračuna za leto 2005, se je izvrševanje v zadnjih nekaj letih res občutno povečalo:
Judging from the surplus of 2005 budget implementation has indeed improved considerably over the past few years:
Znesek presežka za leto 2003 zavaja, ker je bil proračun za leto 2003 že zmanjšan za 5.000 milijonov evrov s spremembo proračuna 2003 (Komisija je izjavila, da ni sposobna izpeljati vseh načrtovanih plačil iz strukturnih skladov, ker so bila precenjena).
The figure of the surplus for 2003 is misleading because the Budget 2003 had already been decreased by an amount of EUR 5 000 million in an amending budget in 2003 (the Commission had declared itself unable to carry out all structural funds payments as planned due to them having been largely overestimated).
Natančneje to pomeni, da so bili prispevki držav članic v proračun EU že znižani za znesek 5.000 milijonov evrov.
In concrete terms, this means that the contributions of Member States to the EU budget had already been reduced by the amount of EUR 5 000 million.
Zato je dejanski saldo proračuna za leto 2003 10.500 milijonov evrov, ki ne predstavlja izboljšanja izvrševanja predhodnega proračuna.
Hence, the de facto balance of Budget 2003 is EUR 10 500 million, which is not an improvement to the execution of the previous budget.
V preteklih letih so bila neporabljena sredstva odobritev plačil daleč najvišji sestavni del končnega salda proračuna EU, leta 2005 pa so bili izredni prihodki v višini 1.292 milijonov evrov višji od neporabljenih sredstev, ki so znašala 1.077 milijonov evrov (glej prilogo).
While in previous years the under-spending of payment appropriations was by far the main component of the final balance of the EU budgets, in 2005 the extra revenue of EUR 1 292 million was higher than the under-spending of EUR 1 077 of funds (see ANNEX).
Padajoč presežek je tako dejansko rezultat izboljšanja izvrševanja proračuna, ne pa nepričakovanih izrednih prihodkov.
So, the decreasing surplus is indeed due to progress in the execution of the budget and not to some unexpected extra revenue.
Izvrševanje razdelka 2 se je močno izboljšalo: leta 2005 je bil znesek neporabljenih sredstev le 58 milijonov evrov (0,2 %) od celotnih 32.641 milijonov evrov.
Implementation in Heading 2 has improved dramatically: In 2005, the sum not spent was only EUR 58 million (0.2%) out of a total EUR 32 641 million.
Skupna ocena razdelka 3 je tudi precej pozitivna, kljub nekaterim problemom pri izvrševanju posameznih proračunskih vrstic in področij.
In Heading 3 the overall assessment, despite some implementation problems for individual budget lines and areas that still need attention, is also quite positive.
Strateško pomembni instrumenti, kot so promet, telekomunikacije in energetska omrežja TEN ali Schengenski vir, so bili izvršeni v celoti.
Strategically important instruments such as transport, telecommunications and energy TEN or the Schengen facility have been fully implemented.
Težave ostajajo v razdelku 4, kjer 181 milijonov evrov ali 3,5 % celotnih odobritev plačil ni bilo porabljenih.
Difficulties remain in Heading 4 where EUR 181 million or 3.5% of the total payment appropriations were not spent.
Čeprav obstajajo primeri celotne izvršitve proračuna, kot je na primer program MEDA, še vedno obstajajo problematična področja (manjši programi), kjer se je treba še posebej potruditi.
Although there are examples of full budget implementation like the MEDA programme there are still some problematic areas (smaller programmes) which need some supplementary effort.
V razdelku 7 je ostala v primerjavi z letom 2004 sorazmerno višja raven neporabljenih sredstev, 463 milijonov evrov od skupnih 3.428 milijonov evrov (13,5 %), ki so ostala neporabljena predvsem zato, ker so nacionalne oblasti pozno prenesle plačilne naloge.
Regarding Heading 7, a proportionally higher level, compared to 2004, of unspent funding was registered, with EUR 463 million left of a total of EUR 3 428 million (13.5%), due mainly to the late transmission of payment claims by national authorities.
Tudi to stanje je precej nezadovoljivo.
This situation is also quite unsatisfactory.
Na koncu bi poročevalec rad izpostavil, da so prizadevanja Komisije za boljše izvrševanje politik EU obrodila sadove.
In conclusion, your rapporteur would like to point out that the efforts undertaken by the Commission to better implement EU policies have seemingly born fruit.
Seveda pa je dejstvo, da so se presežki v zadnjih nekaj letih znižali, vsaj deloma mogoče pripisati dejstvu, da so proračuni EU-25 precej strožji kot proračuni EU-15 pred letom 2004.
Of course, the fact that surplus figures have gone down over the past few years can also be, at least in part, attributed to the fact that the budgets for EU-25 have been a lot more stringent than the budgets for EU-15 before 2004.
Glede na dosežen sporazum o novem finančnem okviru za 2007–2013 se stanje nezadostnih sredstev ne bo le podaljšalo, temveč se bo še poslabšalo.
Given the agreement reached on the new financial framework for 2007 - 2013, the situation of scarce resources will not only be prolonged but even exacerbated.
V tem primeru bo popolno izvrševanje proračuna postalo ključna potreba Unije pri uresničevanju izzivov v prihajajočih letih.
In this situation, full budget implementation will become a vital necessity for the Union to meet the challenges of the coming years.
Neporabljena sredstva odobritev plačil leta 2005 po razdelkih finančne perspektive:
Under-spending of payment appropriations in 2005 by heading of the financial perspective:
Odhodki po naslovu v finančni perspektivi
Expenditure by title of financial perspective
Odobritev plačil* (1)
Payment appropriations* (1)
odobrena sredstva, prenesena v proračunsko leto 2006
Appropriations carried over to 2006
Odobrena sredstva, prenesena iz proračunskega leta 2004
Appropriations carried over from 2004 which lapse
Saldo odhodkov 2005* (6) = (3) – (4) + (5)
Balance of expenditure, 2005* (6) = (3) – (4) + (5)
Zunanji ukrepi
External action
* ne vključuje odobritev plačil, ki ustrezajo namenskim prejemkom
* not including payment appropriations corresponding to assigned revenue
Predlog spremembe proračuna št. 2/2006 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, Oddelek III – Komisija
Draft amending budget No 2/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III - Commission
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o o ocenjevanju in obvladovanju poplav
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of floods
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni Razvoj ..................................................................38
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................40
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ocenjevanju in obvladovanju poplav
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of floods
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0015 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0015 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 175 (1) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim je Komisija posredovala svoj predlog ( C6‑0020/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0020/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in mnenj Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6‑0182/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0182/2006 ),
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ocenjevanju in obvladovanju poplav
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of floods
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ocenjevanju in obvladovanju tveganja poplav
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of flood risks