natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kljub popolnemu spoštovanju raznolikosti pravnih redov držav članic, neodvisnosti sodstva in vseh obstoječih evropskih mehanizmov, je treba nujno utrditi evropsko območje pravice za zagotovitev temeljnih pravic in svoboščin vseh državljanov EU in za okrepitev skupnega zaupanja in vladavine prava v vsej Uniji.
Allowing for the need for full respect of the diversity of the Member States' legal systems, the independence of the judiciary and all the existing European mechanisms, it is now important, as a matter of urgency, to consolidate the European area of justice in order to guarantee the fundamental rights and freedoms of all EU citizens, while reinforcing mutual trust and the rule of law throughout the Union.
Zato je treba pospešiti sodno sodelovanje, pri katerem je eno izmed ključnih vprašanj prav izmenjava podatkov.
In this connection, it is essential to step up judicial cooperation, and here the exchange of information is one of the crucial issues.
S tem predlogom se želi izboljšati komunikacijo in zagotoviti pravilen, celosten in izčrpen odgovor na zahtevke za podatke iz kazenske evidence med državami članicami.
The objective of the present proposal is to improve communication and ensure that there is a correct, complete and exhaustive response to requests for information on criminal records between Member States.
V tem pogledu je potreben dodatni razvoj za vzpostavitev evropskih mehanizmov izmenjave podatkov v predpisani, računalniški in lahko prevedljivi obliki, ob uporabi avtomatskih postopkov in na osnovi „standardne evropske oblike.“
With this in mind, further progress is needed in order to establish European mechanisms for the exchange of information in a standard, computerised and easily translatable form, using automated procedures and on the basis of a 'standard European format'.
Sedanji pravni okvir
The existing legal framework
Podatki o kazenskih obsodbah se trenutno razpošiljajo med državami članicami na podlagi mehanizmov, določenih v Evropski konvenciji o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah iz leta 1959 (konvencija Sveta Evrope; v nadaljnjem besedilu „konvencija iz leta 1959“), zlasti členov 13 in 22, ter člena 4 dodatnega protokola k konvenciji z dne 17. marca 1978.
At present, information on convictions circulates between Member States under the mechanisms of the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 1959 (Council of Europe Convention; hereinafter 'the 1959 Convention'), and, specifically, its Articles 13 and 22 and Article 4 of the additional protocol of 17 March 1978.
Te določbe urejajo:
These provisions regulate:
- pogoje posredovanja izpiskov iz kazenske evidence med pogodbenicami konvencije (člen 13); ter
- the conditions governing the forwarding of extracts from criminal records between the parties to the Convention (Article 13); and
- obvezo medsebojnega in avtomatičnega posredovanja podrobnosti o vseh obsodbah, izrečenih državljanom drugih pogodbenic (člen 22).
- the obligation to transmit, on a reciprocal and automatic basis and once a year, details of convictions affecting nationals of other contracting member states (Article 22).
Vendar pa mehanizem, zasnovan na konvenciji iz leta 1959, ni zadovoljiv.
However, the mechanism based on the 1959 Convention is not satisfactory.
Avtomatično posredovanje podatkov o obsodbah državljanov pogodbenic (člen 22) je včasih neprimerno ali celo ne obstaja.
The automatic forwarding of information on convictions of nationals of a contracting member state (Article 22) is sometimes inadequate and may even be completely non-existent.
Za pridobitev podatkov na podlagi zahtevka za vzajemno pomoč iz člena 13 je postopek tako zapleten, da v večini primerov sodni organi sploh ne zaprosijo za podatke.
To obtain information following a request for mutual assistance under Article 13, it is necessary to follow a procedure that is so complicated that in most cases the judicial authorities simply do not ask for any information.
To pomeni, da so državljani drugih držav članic velikokrat obsojeni na podlagi kazenske evidence države, v kateri poteka sojenje, brez da bi se upoštevale obsodbe iz drugih držav članic in še posebej iz države članice državljanstva oziroma prebivanja.
This means that nationals of other member states are often sentenced taking account of their criminal record in the country where the trial takes place, but not of their convictions in other Member States, and, in particular, that of which they are nationals or residents.
Komisija je 13. oktobra 2004 sprejela prvi predlog okvirnega sklepa Sveta o izmenjavi podatkov iz kazenskih evidenc, katerega cilj je bil kratkoročno izboljšati sisteme iz konvencije iz leta 1959.
On 13 October 2004 the Commission adopted an initial proposal for a framework decision on the exchange of information extracted from criminal records, with a view to the short-term improvement of the mechanisms of the 1959 Convention.
Predlog pa teh mehanizmov ne spremeni bistveno in je le delen odziv na njihove pomanjkljivosti.
However, this proposal does not substantially alter those mechanisms, and takes only a partial step towards remedying their dysfunctions.
Cilj tega predloga je bistveno spremeniti te mehanizme, da bo država članica državljanstva lahko podala hiter, pravilen, celosten in izčrpen odgovor na zahtevke za podatke, ki jih prejme.
The present proposal is aimed at a major reform of those mechanisms, so as to ensure that the Member State of nationality can give a swift, correct, complete and exhaustive reply to the requests for information it receives.
Upoštevati je treba tudi okvirni sklep Sveta o upoštevanju obsodb med državami članicami Evropske unije v novem kazenskem postopku.
Account should also be taken of the Council framework decision on the taking into account of convictions in the Member States of the EU in the course of new criminal proceedings.
Avtomatično posredovanje podatkov o obsodbah
Automatic transmission of information on convictions
Predlog obvezuje države članice, da si redno, in sicer takoj ali čim prej (ne le enkrat letno), izmenjujejo podatke o obsodbah ali kasnejših spremembah, ki povzročijo spremembo ali izbris podatkov iz kazenskih evidenc.
The proposal obliges Member States to exchange information regularly, and either immediately or as soon as possible (not just once a year), on convictions and on other subsequent changes entailing the modification or deletion of information contained in the registers of criminal records.
Poleg tega mora država članica državljanstva hraniti in posodabljati posredovane podatke (vse evidence morajo vsebovati iste podatke o neki osebi in neki obsodbi).
In addition, the Member State of nationality is obliged to keep and update the information transmitted (all registers must contain the same information on a given individual and a given conviction).
Teh pravil pa se ne sme uporabiti v namen, da se neki osebi zagotovi manj ugodno obravnavo kot na sodišču njene matične države.
These rules must not, however, be used in such a way that someone receives less favourable treatment than had he been sentenced by a court in his own Member State.
Da se zagotovi učinkovito in pravilno delovanje izmenjave, morajo podatki o obsodbah vsebovati zaznamek o državljanstvu obsojenca in navedbo, koliko časa morajo biti vpisani v evidenco države članice, kjer je bila izrečena obsodba.
In order to ensure the effective and correct functioning of the exchange, the information on convictions should include the nationality of the person convicted and the time-period for which the record should remain in the register of the convicting Member State.
Izmenjava podatkov na podlagi zahtevka
Exchange of information following a request
Za podatke iz nacionalnih kazenskih evidenc lahko zaprosijo osrednji organ države članice, posameznik, ki zaprosi za svojo kazensko evidenco (preko osrednjega organa države članice) ali tretja država (v skladu s členom 13 konvencije iz leta 1959).
Information on criminal records may be requested by the central authority of a Member State, by an individual in relation to his own criminal background (through a central authority of a Member State), or by a third country (under Article 13 of the 1959 Convention).
Za pospeševanje izmenjav mora osrednji organ zaprositi za podatke v „standardni evropski obliki“ (razen v tretjih državah).
In order to facilitate the exchange, all requests submitted by a central authority must follow a 'standard European format' (third countries are exempted).
Da se pospeši proces izmenjave podatkov, predlog sklepa urejuje tudi časovne roke za odgovore na zahtevke.
In addition, with a view to accelerating the process of information exchange, the proposal lays down time-limits for replying to requests.
Na zahtevke držav članic je treba odgovoriti v desetih delovnih dneh, na zahtevke posameznikov za svoje podatke iz kazenske evidence pa v dvajsetih.
Requests from a Member State must be replied to within ten days, and those from individuals about their own criminal backgrounds within twenty working days.
Zahtevki tretjih držav so urejeni v konvenciji iz leta 1959, v kateri časovni roki niso določeni.
Requests from third countries are governed by the 1959 Convention, which does not lay down a specific time-limit.
Predlog predvideva tri postopke za odgovarjanje na zahtevke za podatke o obsodbah:
The proposal distinguishes three types of procedure for replying to a request for information on convictions:
- če se podatke zahteva v okviru kazenskega postopka, mora država članica državljanstva posredovati podatke o vseh obsodbah, vpisanih v njenih arhivih: nacionalne obsodbe, obsodbe, ki so bile izrečene v drugi državi članici, in obsodbe, izrečene v tretjih državah;
- if the information is requested in the context of criminal proceedings, the Member State of nationality must transmit information on all the convictions to be found in its records: national convictions, those handed down in another Member State, and those handed down in third countries;
- če se podatke zahteva za druge uporabe in ne za kazenski postopek, mora država članica državljanstva odgovoriti na zahtevek v skladu s svojo zakonodajo o nacionalnih obsodbah in obsodbah, izrečenih v tretjih državah.
- if the information is requested for purposes other than criminal proceedings, the Member State of nationality must reply pursuant to its own law on national convictions and third-country convictions.
Vendar pa mora država članica državljanstva v primeru obsodb, ki so bile izrečene v drugih državah članicah, preveriti pri zadevni državi, ali in v kolikšnem obsegu lahko posreduje prejete podatke.
However, in the case of convictions handed down by other Member States, it must check with the Member State concerned whether and to what extent it may transmit the information received.
Če pa se zahteva tudi podatke o obsodbah, izrečenih v drugih državah članicah, mora država članica državljanstva, ki je zaprosila za podatke, preveriti, ali in v kolikšnem obsegu lahko posreduje podatke.
However, where the information requested includes convictions handed down by another Member State, the Member State of nationality from which the information is requested must check whether and to what extent it may transmit the information.
Če zahtevek ni povezan s kazenskim postopkom, država članica odgovori v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
If the request is not related to criminal proceedings, it must reply in accordance with national law.
Opombe in priporočila poročevalca
Rapporteur's remarks and recommendations
Poročevalec je zadovoljen s predlogom Komisije in misli, da bo izvajanje predlaganega mehanizma pozitivno prispevalo k sprejetju odločitev na pravnem področju.
Your rapporteur believes that the Commission's proposal is to be welcomed, and considers that the implementation of the proposed mechanism will make a positive contribution to the adoption of resolutions in the legal field.
Poročevalec predlaga več predlogov sprememb za dopolnitev predloga in za razjasnitev besedila.
He proposes a number of amendments aimed at making the proposal more inclusive and clarifying its wording.
Nekateri predlogi sprememb so predlagani za uskladitev tega predloga z okvirnim sklepom o upoštevanju obsodb v državah članicah Evropske unije v novih kazenskih postopkih.
Some of the amendments are intended to bring it into line with the framework decision on the taking into account of convictions in the Member States of the EU in the course of new criminal proceedings.
Besedilo predloga mora biti jasno in natančno, izogibati se je treba uporabi pogojnega načina izražanja, ki bi lahko pripeljalo do napačnega razumevanja, da je posredovanje podatkov odvisno le od dobre volje držav članic.
The proposal needs to be clearly and precisely worded, avoiding conditional formulations which could give the impression that the transmission of information could be purely a matter for Member States' goodwill.
Prav tako morajo vse jezikovne različice vsebovati pravno terminologijo, ki se popolnoma sklada s terminologijo, uporabljeno v državi članici.
Equally, its legal terminology in each of the language versions must correspond in full with that in use in the Member State concerned.
Za izboljšanje učinkovitosti izvajanja pravnega sodelovanja na kazenskem področju je pomembno obdržati mehanizem, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, v skladu s katerim:
In order to boost the efficiency in practice of legal cooperation in the criminal field, it is important to maintain the mechanism proposed by the Commission, under which:
1. je država članica državljanstva odgovorna za hranjenje podatkov o obsodbah, izrečenih za njene državljane;
1. the Member State of nationality will be responsible for keeping the information on convictions of its own nationals;
2. vsakršni spremembi ali izbrisu podatkov iz kazenske evidence države članice, v kateri je bila izrečena obsodba, sledi ista sprememba ali izbris v evidenci države članice državljanstva.
2. any alteration or deletion of information on criminal records that occurs in the convicting Member State must entail the same alteration or deletion in the Member State of nationality.
Ureditev spreminjanja oziroma izbrisa podatkov iz kazenske evidence zelo pomembna.
The arrangements for alteration or deletion of criminal records are very important.
Seveda obstajata dve možnosti: spremembe in izbrisi se lahko izvršijo v skladu z zakonodajo države članice državljanstva obsojenca ali pa se urejajo v skladu z zakonodajo države, kjer je bila izrečena obsodba.
There are of course two possibilities: those alterations or deletions can follow either the law of the Member State of nationality of the convicted person, or that of the convicting Member State.
Ali bi bili podatki o določeni obsodbi na nacionalnem sodišču dostopni drugim državam članicam, bi bilo v prvem primeru odvisno od državljanstva obsojenca.
With the first option, criminal records arising from a sentence of a national court would be available or not to the other Member States depending on the convicted person's nationality.
Država članica, ki bi zahtevala podatke iz kazenske evidence države članice državljanstva, ne bi nujno dobila vseh obstoječih podatkov o zadevni osebi, ampak le podatke, za katere je država članica državljanstva menila, da jih v skladu s svojo zakonodajo mora hraniti.
A Member State asking for information from the register of the Member State of nationality would not necessarily obtain all the information existing on the person concerned: it would obtain only such data as the Member State of nationality believed it should keep under its own law.
Bolj primerno bi bilo izvajanje zakona države obsodbe, saj kljub temu, da ne zagotavlja istih pravil glede obdobja hranitve podatkov v kazenski evidenci, preprečuje izkrivljanje zaradi državljanstva ter zagotavlja popolnost podatkov v kazenskih evidencah.
In this case, even if there would be no guarantee that the same rules would apply on the time-period for keeping criminal records, the formula avoids distortions arising from nationality and ensures the integrity of the data contained in the registers of criminal records.
Prav tako je pomembno, da sklep ne vsebuje zahtev, ki bi jih države članice težko izpolnile, saj bi to oviralo izmenjavo podatkov.
Finally, the decision must not propose requirements which it would be difficult for the Member States to comply with, as this would slow down the exchange of information.
Nekateri predlogi v osnutku sklepa zahtevajo oblikovanje dodatnih kazal in evidenc, kar bi nedvomno upočasnilo izvajanje načrtovanih mehanizmov.
Some of the provisions proposed would entail creating sub-indexes or sub-registers which would delay implementation of the mechanism to be created.
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode
on the proposal for a Council regulation on establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0822 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0822 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 36 in 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0045/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0045/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6–0171/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0171/2007 ),
(6) Zaradi poenostavitve ne bi smele biti vprašljive politične odločitve, sprejete v preteklih letih na področju SKP.
(6) Simplification should not lead to calling into question the political decisions that have been taken over the years in the CAP.
Ta uredba bi v bistvu morala biti tehnična poenostavitev.
This Regulation should, therefore, essentially be an act of technical simplification.
Zato ne bi smela razveljaviti ali spremeniti obstoječih instrumentov, razen če so zastareli, odvečni ali po svoji naravi ne bi smeli biti obravnavani na ravni Sveta, in tudi ne sme uvajati novih instrumentov ali ukrepov.
It should not, therefore, repeal or change existing instruments unless they have become obsolete, redundant or should not, by their very nature, be dealt with at Council level nor introduce new instruments or measures.
Ta uredba bi morala biti izključno tehnična poenostavitev.
This Regulation should, therefore, solely be an act of technical simplification.
Zato ne bi smela razveljaviti ali spremeniti obstoječih instrumentov, razen če po svoji povsem tehnični naravi ti ne bi smeli biti obravnavani na ravni Sveta, in tudi ne bi smela sme uvajati novih instrumentov ali ukrepov.
It should not, therefore, repeal or change existing instruments unless they should not, by their purely technical nature, be dealt with at Council level nor should it introduce new instruments or measures.
7) Na podlagi navedenega ta uredba ne bi smela uvajati tistih delov skupnih ureditev trgov, ki so predmet revizije politike.
(7) Against this background, this Regulation should not introduce those parts of CMOs which are subject to policy reviews .
To velja glede nekaterih delov sektorjev sadja in zelenjave ter sektorja banan in sektorja vina.
This is the case with regard to certain parts of the fruit and vegetables, the bananas and the wine sectors.
Zato bi bilo treba pravila iz uredb (EGS) št. 404/93, (ES) št. 2200/96, (ES) št. 2201/96 in (ES) št. 1493/1999 vključiti v to uredbo samo v tistem obsegu, ki ni predmet reform politike .
The rules contained in the respective Regulations (EEC) No 404/93, (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1493/1999 should , therefore, only be incorporated into this Regulation to the extent that they are not themselves subject to any policy reforms.
(7) Na podlagi navedenega ta uredba ne bi smela uvajati skupnih ureditev trgov, ki so predmet revizije politike, in ne bi smeli biti vključeni v to uredbo, dokler niso dokončane reforme politike .
(7) Against this background, this Regulation should not introduce CMOs which are subject to policy reviews and should not be incorporated into this Regulation until the ongoing policy reforms have been completed .
(9) V skupnih ureditvah trgov za žita, riž, sladkor, posušeno krmo, semena, oljke, lan in konopljo, banane, vino , mleko in mlečne izdelke ter sviloprejke so določena tržna leta, ki so v glavnem prilagojena biološkim proizvodnim ciklom vsakega od teh proizvodov.
(9) The CMOs for cereals, rice, sugar, dried fodder, seeds, olives, flax and hemp, bananas, wine, milk and milk products and silk worms provide for marketing years mainly adapted to the biological production cycles of each of these products.
V skupnih ureditvah trgov za sadje in zelenjavo ter predelano sadje in zelenjavo je bila Komisija pooblaščena, da določi tržna leta, ker se proizvodni cikli teh proizvodov precej spreminjajo in ker v nekaterih primerih tržnega leta ni treba določiti.
In the CMOs for fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables, the Commission has been empowered to fix the marketing years due to the fact that the production cycles of these products vary to a large extent and that in some cases it is not necessary to fix a marketing year.
Tržna leta, kakor so bila določena v navedenih sektorjih, in pooblastila Komisije za določitev tržnih let za sadje in zelenjavo ter predelano sadje in zelenjavo je zato treba vključiti v to uredbo.
The marketing years as they have been fixed in the mentioned sectors and the power of the Commission to fix the marketing years for the fruit and vegetables and the processed fruit and vegetables sectors should, therefore, be incorporated into this Regulation.
(9) V skupnih ureditvah trgov za žita, riž, sladkor, posušeno krmo, semena, oljke, lan in konopljo, banane, mleko in mlečne izdelke ter sviloprejke so določena tržna leta, ki so v glavnem prilagojena biološkim proizvodnim ciklom vsakega od teh proizvodov.
(9) The CMOs for cereals, rice, sugar, dried fodder, seeds, olives, flax and hemp, bananas, milk and milk products and silk worms provide for marketing years mainly adapted to the biological production cycles of each of these products.
(11 a) Medpanožne organizacije, ki se ustanovijo na pobudo združenih subjektov, lahko, če predstavljajo pomemben del članov različnih poklicnih skupin sektorja sadja in zelenjave, prispevajo k temu, da se bolj upošteva stanje na trgu in pospešuje komercialni pristop za izboljšanje poznavanja proizvodnje in njene organizacije ter predstavljanja in trženja proizvodov.
(11a) Organisations of an interbranch nature set up at the initiative of operator organisations and representing a significant share of the different professional categories of the sector concerned are capable of taking greater account of the realities of the market and of facilitating the development of modes of economic behaviour with a view to improving knowledge as well as the organisation of production and product presentation and marketing.
Če lahko dejavnosti teh medpanožnih organizacij v splošnem smislu prispevajo k uresničenju ciljev iz člena 33 Pogodbe, in še posebej ciljev iz te uredbe, ta uredba ne izraža dvoma v smisel obstoja in delovanja te vrste organizacij v državah članicah.
Given that the activities of these organisations of an interprofessional nature can make a general contribution to the realisation of the objectives of Article 33 of the Treaty, and in particular of those referred to in this Regulation, this Regulation does not call into question the existence and the functioning of this type of organisation in the Member States.
Potrebno je omeniti medpanožno naravo teh sporazumov ter s tem izključiti vsakršno tveganje razlage na način, ki bi izražal dvom v sedanje in prihodnje medpanožne organizacije.
Interbranch activities and agreements should be mentioned in order to exclude any risk of the Regulation being interpreted in such a way as to call into question existing or future organisations of an interbranch nature.