natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zlasti ker gre za sporazum, sklenjen z malo državo, ki ima resne težave pri gospodarskem in družbenem razvoju, poročevalec meni, da so ustrezni tako cilji in načela, ki ga urejajo, kot tudi vanj vključene določbe za izvajanje, katerih namen je delovanje sporazuma v praksi.
Especially in view of the fact that the agreement concerns a small country with serious economic and social problems, the rapporteur considers that the principles and objectives on which it is based are appropriate, as are the implementing measures contained in the agreement with a view to giving it practical effect.
Poročevalec z zadovoljstvom poudarja, da je bila pri vseh ukrepih, izvedenih v okviru sporazuma, v celoti spoštovana suverenost Komorov in da je bil poudarek namenjen kontinuiranemu političnemu dialogu, bodisi neposrednemu bodisi v okviru pristojnih mednarodnih organizacij, katerega cilj je prenos in delitev znanja in izkušenj, potrebnih za zagotavljanje odgovornega upravljanja z ribolovnimi viri, razvoj ribiškega sektorja na Komorih in pospeševanje sodelovanja med gospodarskimi akterji Skupnosti in Komorov.
The rapporteur welcomes, in particular, the full respect shown for Comorian sovereignty in all the measures to be taken under the agreement and the emphasis placed on ongoing political dialogue between the parties , both directly and within the relevant international organisations, with a view to transferring and sharing of the necessary know-how to guarantee the responsible management of fishery resources, the development of the fishing sector in the Comoros, and the promotion of cooperation between Community and Comorian economic operators.
Iz navedenih razlogov se Evropskemu parlamentu predlaga, da obravnavanemu sporazumu nameni svojo politično podporo.
In view of the above, it is proposed that the European Parliament give its political approval to the agreement.
MNENJE odbora za razvoj
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT
Po členu 178 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti mora skupna ribiška politika upoštevati razvojne cilje iz člena 177 Pogodbe, zlasti boj proti revščini in trajnostni razvoj lokalnega prebivalstva.
Under Article 178 of the European Community Treaty, the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) must take into account the development objectives set out in Article 177 of the Treaty, mainly the fight against poverty and the sustainable development of local populations.
Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za razvoj je Svet in Komisijo opozoril na omenjeno dolžnost, ko je pripravljal več zaporednih mnenj o starih sporazumih o ribolovu in novih partnerskih sporazumih o ribolovu, ki mu jih je predložila Evropska komisija.
The European Parliament's Development Committee has called the attention of the Council and the Commission to that obligation when drafting successive opinions on the old fisheries agreements and new fisheries partnership agreements submitted to it by the European Commission.
Novi predlog sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju z Unijo Komori bi lahko bil odlična priložnost, da Komisija Svetu predlaga, naj upošteva mnenja Odbora za razvoj in s tem tudi dolžnosti iz Pogodbe.
This new proposal for a Fisheries Partnership Agreement with the Comoros could have been a good opportunity for the Commission to propose to Council to take on board our committee's views, thereby observing the Treaty obligations.
Odbor meni, da sklicevanje na "povezane dejavnosti" na koncu člena 1 sporazuma glede na razvojne cilje ne zadostuje.
The committee considers the reference made at the end of article 1 of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement to "related activities" insufficient when seen in terms of these development objectives.
V členih 1 in 7 sporazuma mora biti jasno navedeno, da je treba področje veljave sporazuma in finančne prispevke, ki jih predvideva, usmeriti v projekte, katerih namen je razvoj obalnega prebivalstva, ki se preživlja z ribolovom.
Article 1 and Article 7 of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement should clearly state that the scope and the financial contribution under the agreement should address projects aimed at the development of coastal populations living on fisheries.
Čas je, da začneta Komisija in Svet natančno upoštevati določbe iz Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
It is time for Commission and Council to observe what the European Community Treaty clearly states.
Institucije Unije morajo biti prve pri spoštovanju Pogodbo.
Union institutions must be the first to respect the Treaty.
Predlog uredbe Sveta je bil predložen Parlamentu pet mesecev po objavi uredbe (ES) št. 1660/2005 z dne 6. oktobra 2005, ki evropskim plovilom dovoljuje ribolov v komorskih vodah do 31. decembra 2010.
This proposal for a Council regulation was submitted to Parliament only five months after the publication of Regulation (EC) n°1660/2005 of 6 October 2005, whereby European boats can fish in Comoros waters until 31 December 2010.
V svojem mnenju Odboru Evropskega parlamenta za ribištvo iz maja 2005 smo jasno povedali, da bi morala Komisija upoštevati "integrirani okvir za partnerske sporazume o ribolovu s tretjimi državami".
In our opinion to the European Parliament's Fisheries Committee of May 2005, we clearly said that the Commission should have observed the "integrated framework for fisheries partnership agreements with third countries".
Komisija je raje nadaljevala s pogajanji po sistemu starih sporazumov o ribolovu, predložitev pričujočega pravnega besedila pa samo potrjuje, da je imel Odbor za razvoj prav.
The Commission preferred to follow the negotiations under the old fisheries agreements system and the submission of the present legal text is a confirmation that Parliament's Development Committee was right.
Parlament naj bi zdaj pristal na nadomestitev obstoječega pravnega besedila z novim, ki je bilo spremenjeno v skladu z novim okvirom za partnerske sporazume o ribolovu.
What Parliament is now being asked to do is to accept the replacement of the existing legal text by a new one renegotiated according to the new framework for fisheries partnership agreements.
Takšni nadomestitvi ne nasprotujemo, obžalujemo pa, da je Komisija tratila čas in denar, ki bi ga lahko prihranila, če bi nas poslušala.
We have no objections to that replacement, we simply regret that, having failed to listen to us, the Commission has spent time and money that could have been saved.
(3) Ta sporazum predvideva okrepitev gospodarskega, finančnega, tehničnega in znanstvenega sodelovanja v ribiškem sektorju, da se zagotovi ohranjanje in trajnostno izkoriščanje virov, partnerstvo med podjetji, usmerjenimi v razvoj gospodarskih dejavnosti v ribiškem sektorju, in razvoj obalnih skupnosti, ki se preživljajo s ribolovom, in sicer predvsem s pomočjo za ustanavljanje majhnih lokalnih obratov za konzerviranje in predelavo rib ter za trženje ribiških proizvodov.
(3) The Fisheries Partnership Agreement provides for improved economic, financial, technical and scientific cooperation in the fisheries sector with a view to guaranteeing the conservation and sustainable exploitation of resources, as well as partnerships between undertakings aimed at developing economic activities in the fisheries sector and the development of coastal populations living on fisheries, mainly through support for the creation of small local fish canning and processing industries and the marketing of fish .
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Unijo Komori
Proposal for a Council regulation concerning the conclusion of the Partnership Agreement in the fisheries sector between the European Community and the Union of the Comoros
o letnem poročilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu o protidampinških, protisubvencijskih in zaščitnih ukrepih tretjih držav proti Skupnosti (2004)
on the annual report from the Commission to the European Parliament on third country anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard action against the Community (2004)
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu o protidampinških, protisubvencijskih in zaščitnih ukrepih tretjih držav proti Skupnosti (2004) ( KOM(2005)0594 ),
– having regard to the annual report from the Commission to the European Parliament on third country anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard action against the Community (2004) ( COM(2005)0594 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 22. oktobra 2002 o devetnajstem letnem poročilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu o protidampinških in protisubvencijskih dejavnostih Skupnosti – podatki o spremljanju protidampinških, protisubvencijskih in zaščitnih primerov tretjih držav
– having regard to its resolution of 22 October 2002 on the Nineteenth annual report from the Commission to the European Parliament on the Community's anti-dumping and anti-subsidy activities - Overview of the monitoring of third country anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard cases
UL C 300E z dne 11.12.2003, str.
OJ C 300 E, ,
UL C 19 z dne 28.1.1991, str.
OJ C 19, 28.1.1991, p.
633. in resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2001 o odprtosti in demokraciji v mednarodni trgovini
633. and of 25 October 2001 on openness and democracy in international trade
UL C 112E z dne 9.5.2002, str.
OJ C 112E, 9.5.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju izjave, sprejete na četrti konferenci ministrov Svetovne trgovinske organizacije v Dohi (Qatar), ki v odstavku 28 predvideva pogajanja o reformi sporazuma o uporabi člena VI GATT iz leta 1994 ter natančno opredeljuje in izboljšuje določbe o disciplini,
– having regard to the declaration of the Fourth Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization in Doha (Qatar), point 28 of which prescribes negotiations to revise the agreement on the implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994 with a view to clarifying and improving the provisions relating to disciplines,
– ob upoštevanju odstavka 30 te izjave, ki poudarja potrebo po izboljšanju in razjasnitvi memoranduma dogovora o reševanju sporov ("dispute settlement understanding"),
– having regard to paragraph 30 of the above declaration, which stresses the need to improve and clarify the dispute settlement understanding,
– ob upoštevanju izjave ministrov z dne 18. decembra 2005 o razvojnem programu iz Dohe, zlasti točk 28 in 34 ter priloge D,
– having regard to the ministerial declaration of 18 December 2005 on the Doha Development Agenda (DDA), and in particular to points 28 and 34 and Annex D to that declaration,
– ob upoštevanju triindvajsetega letnega poročila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu o protidampinških, protisubvencijskih in zaščitnih ukrepih tretjih držav proti Skupnosti (2004) ( KOM(2005)0360 ),
– having regard to the 23rd annual report from the Commission to the European Parliament on the Community's anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard activities (2004) ( COM(2005)0360 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 in člena 112(2) poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 45 and 112(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6-0243/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0243/2006 ),
A. ker je Evropska unija eden od glavnih udeležencev v mednarodni trgovini, ker je še vedno gospodarska velesila in ker je bila leta 2004 prvi svetovni izvoznik blaga,
A. whereas the European Union is a key player in world international trade, continues to be a major economic power and was the world's leading exporter of goods in 2004,
B. ker je z razvojem mednarodne trgovine dostop do tujih trgov postal enako pomemben kot zaščita lastnega trga pred nelojalnimi trgovinskimi praksami,
B. whereas developments in international trade make access to external markets as important as defending our own markets from unfair trading practices,
C. ker se s sprostitvijo trgovine in večjim obsegom menjave razvija mednarodna konkurenca, vendar se veča tudi nevarnost, da bo izvoz določene države postal predmet trgovinskih zaščitnih ukrepov z negativnimi posledicami za mednarodno konkurenčnost podjetij Skupnosti,
C. whereas trade liberalisation and the increasing volume of trade promote international competition, but also increase the risk of exports from a given country being subject to trade defence measures, which have a damaging impact on the international competitiveness of Community firms,
D. ker si je Skupnost v nedavno revidirani lizbonski agendi postavila cilj okrepiti evropsko gospodarstvo, med drugim s povečanjem konkurenčnosti Skupnosti v svetovnem gospodarstvu,
D. whereas, under the recently reviewed Lisbon Agenda, the Community set itself the objective of strengthening the European economy by, inter alia, improving the competitiveness of the Community in the world economy,
E. ker priznava, da je konkurenčnost Skupnosti tesno povezana z oblikovanjem svetovnega trgovinskega sistema, ki je čim bolj odprt in pravičen,
E. recognising that the competitiveness of the Community is closely linked to the establishment of a world trading system which is as open and fair as possible,
F. ker se konkurenčnost gospodarstva Skupnosti ne more izogniti posledicam postavljanja tarifnih in netarifnih ovir, ki ne temeljijo na pravilih STO, znotraj in tudi zunaj Skupnosti,
F. whereas the competitiveness of the Community economy cannot fail to be affected by the imposition of tariff and non-tariff barriers which are not based on WTO rules, whether inside or outside the Community,
G. priznava, da je Skupnost na splošno obravnavana kot "zmeren" izvajalec instrumentov za zaščito trgovine in ima torej interes, da njeni mednarodni partnerji razvijejo zakonodajo in prakso, ki bosta čim skladnejši s pravili STO,
G. recognising that the Community is generally considered to be a 'moderate' user of trade defence instruments and that it is therefore in the Community's interests to ensure that the legislation and practices adopted by its international partners comply as far as possible with WTO rules,
2. poziva trgovinske partnerje Skupnosti k večjemu spoštovanju duha in črke veljavnih sporazumov in sodne prakse STO glede instrumentov za zaščito trgovine ter da se izognejo kakršnikoli obliki protekcionizma; zlasti zahteva, da se protidampinške in protisubvencijske preiskave ter zaščitni ukrepi izvajajo na pregleden in nepristranski način;
Calls on the Community's trade partners to comply more closely with the spirit and the letter of the agreements in force and the WTO's case law on trade defence instruments so as to avoid any form of protectionism; calls, in particular, for anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations, and safeguard actions, to be carried out in a transparent and impartial manner;
4. spodbuja Komisijo, da skupaj z zadevnimi državami članicami sprejme ukrepe za zaščito industrije Skupnosti, če bo ugotovljeno, da se pravila o mednarodni trgovini ne spoštujejo;
Encourages the Commission to intervene, together with the Member States concerned, to defend the Community's industry whenever it is ascertained that the rules of international trade are being flouted;
6. izraža zadovoljstvo glede uspešnosti sistema STO za reševanje sporov, ki je omogočil doslednejšo uporabo večstranskih pravil mednarodne trgovine ter zagotovil večjo varnost in predvidljivost sistema;
Expresses satisfaction with the success achieved by the WTO's dispute settlement system, which has led to a more consistent application of the multilateral rules of international trade, thus placing the system on a more secure and reliable basis;
8. poziva Komisijo, da zaradi večje učinkovitosti in zmanjšanja pristranskosti ukrepov za zaščito trgovine, ki jih izvajajo ostale članice STO, odločno nadaljuje pogajanja v okviru te organizacije in pozornost nameni predvsem:
Calls on the Commission to resolutely press ahead with negotiations in the WTO to make the application of trade defence measures by other WTO Members more effective and less arbitrary, focusing in particular on the following points:
a) uporabi strožjih predpisov za petletne revizije, da bi postalo podaljšanje trajanja protidampinških in protisubvencijskih ukrepov izjema;
(a) application of more stringent rules to the five-yearly reviews, to make the extension of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures exceptional;
b) poenostavitvi protidampinških postopkov in znižanju stroškov teh postopkov za podjetja, ki sodelujejo s preiskovalnimi organi;
(b) simplification of anti-dumping procedures and a reduction in their cost for firms which cooperate with the investigating authority;
c) analizi interesa javnosti in posledic zadevnih ukrepov, ki je podobna tisti, ki je v uporabi v Skupnosti;
(c) analysis of the public interest and the impact of the measures in question, along the lines of that conducted in the Community;
d) večji preglednosti preiskav, da bi preprečili zlorabe in zagotovili pravico do zaščite zadevnih strani;
(d) increased transparency in investigations, to avoid illegal practices and guarantee the right to defence for the parties concerned;
e) omejitvam na najnujnejše ukrepe zaradi odprave škodljivih dampinških postopkov;
(e) limitation of measures to that which is strictly necessary in order to eliminate injurious dumping;
f) ustanovitvi ad hoc arbitražne skupine - sestavljene iz strokovnjakov s tega področja - ki bi bila pristojna za začetek protidampinške preiskave in bi lahko v primeru kršitve odredila, da se preiskava nemudoma zaključi; skupino bi morali oblikovati na osnovi jasnih smernic v zvezi s strokovnimi izkušnjami njenih članov na tem področju;
(f) establishment of an ad hoc arbitration group - consisting of relevant experts - to which decisions to open anti-dumping investigations would be referred, and which would be able to order the investigation to be terminated without delay if the rules were infringed; the ad hoc group should have clear guidelines regarding the relevant expertise of its members on the subject in question;
13. poudarja, da je sprejetje ukrepov na ravni Skupnosti edini način za učinkovito zaščito legitimnih interesov evropskih malih in srednje velikih izvoznih podjetij, ki se soočajo z zaščitnimi ukrepi nekaterih držav uvoznic;
Stresses that only by adopting a "Community" approach will it be possible to defend effectively the legitimate interests of Europe's small and medium-sized exporting firms faced with protectionist practices on the part of importing countries;
15. poudarja, da je za dosego soglasja državljanov glede novih pravil mednarodne trgovine potrebno, da se pravila uporabljajo v Skupnosti in tudi zunaj nje na pregleden in dosleden način v skladu z načelom zakonitosti;
Stresses that, if the new rules on international trade are to win public support, they must be applied transparently and consistently, in compliance with the principle of the rule of law, both within and outside the Community;
Evropska skupnost je eden od glavnih udeležencev v mednarodni trgovini in še naprej ostaja gospodarska velesila.
The European Community is one of the key players in world international trade and continues to be a great economic power.
V letu 2004 so evropski izdelki predstavljali 18 % mednarodne trgovine z dobrinami.
In 2004, European products accounted for 18% of the world trade in goods.
V letu 2004 je bila Skupnost največji izvoznik dobrin in drugi največji uvoznik za Združenimi državami.
In 2004 the Community was the leading exporter of goods and the second leading importer after the United States.
Z razvojem mednarodne trgovine je dostop do tujih trgov postal enako pomemben kot zaščita lastnega trga pred nelojalnimi trgovinskimi praksami, med katerimi sta predvsem ponarejanje in uvoz izdelkov, ki ne ustrezajo standardom glede kakovosti Evropske unije.
Developments in international trade mean that access to foreign markets is just as important as defending our own markets from unfair trading practices, such as counterfeiting and the import of goods which do not meet EU quality standards.
S sprostitvijo trgovine in s povečanjem izmenjave se razvija mednarodna konkurenca, vendar se veča tudi nevarnost, da bo izvoz določene države postal predmet zaščitnih ukrepov (protidamping, protisubvencije ali druge oblike zaščite).
Trade liberalisation and the increasing volume of trade increase international competition but also increase the risk of exports from a given country being subject to trade defence measures (anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard measures).
Evropska skupnost seveda ne nasprotuje temu, da druge države članice Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) preiskujejo njen izvoz.
Obviously the European Community does not object to its own exports from being investigated by governments of other WTO member states.
Vendar meni, da je potrebno preveriti, da so preiskave opravljene v skladu z veljavnimi mednarodnimi predpisi in da njihov cilj niso protekcionistični ukrepi, ki naj evropskim izdelkom protizakonito omejijo dostop do trga.
It does, however, consider it necessary to check whether these investigations are carried out in accordance with existing international rules and do not turn into protectionist measures designed unjustly to restrict the market access of European products.
Evropska komisija vsako leto objavi poročilo, s katerim Evropski parlament seznani z zaščitnimi trgovinskimi ukrepi tretjih držav proti Evropski skupnosti.
Each year the Commission publishes a report in which it informs the European Parliament of the trade defence measures taken by third countries against the European Community.
Poročilo za leto 2004 daje Evropskemu parlamentu priložnost, da poda svoje mnenje o pobudah Evropske komisije.
The report for 2004 offers Parliament the opportunity of expressing its own view on these Commission initiatives.
Poročilo namerava s preučitvijo nekaterih značilnih primerov prikazati, na katere težave je naletela evropska industrija v teh preiskavah, katere rešitve je predlagala Evropska komisija za zaščito evropske industrije in kakšni je perspektiva prihodnjega razvoja tega relativno novega vidika trgovinske politike Skupnosti.
The aim of this report is to examine a number of particularly significant cases in order to see what difficulties European industry has encountered in these investigations, what remedies the Commission has introduced and what the future development prospects are for this fairly recent aspect of Community trade policy.
Celostni vpogled
An overview
V zadnjih nekaj letih je število primerov trgovinske zaščite (predvsem, vendar ne samo protidamping) bistveno naraslo.
Over the past few years the number of trade defence cases (mainly, but not exclusively anti-dumping ones) has increased substantially.
Že "tradicionalnim" uporabnikom, kot so Združene države, Kanada in Avstralija, so se pridružile še nove države na pohodu, na primer Indija, Brazilija in Južna Afrika.
Emerging countries such as India, Brazil and South Africa have now joined the 'traditional' users of trade defence instruments (TDI) such as the United States, Canada and Australia.
Največja težava za razvite države (predvsem za Združene države, ki same izvajajo 25 % vseh ukrepov proti Skupnosti) je v preveč togem in enostranskem izvajanju predpisov, ki ne upošteva vedno predpisov in pravne prakse Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
For developed countries (and in particular the United States, which alone accounts for over 25% of all measures against the Community) the chief problems arise from an excessively legalistic and unilateral implementation of the rules, which sometimes pays little heed to the rules and case-law of the WTO.
V nekaterih državah postopek preiskovalnega organa omogoča skoraj avtomatičen začetek protidampinške preiskave, medtem ko onemogoča preklic povsem zastarelih ukrepov.
In certain countries, the investigating authorities follow a procedure allowing anti-dumping investigations to be opened almost automatically while preventing totally anachronistic measures from being revoked.
V svojem poročilu Evropska komisija navaja, da nekatere države "na pohodu" uveljavljajo kompenzacijske pravice ne zato, da bi ukrepale proti nezakonitim trgovinskim praksam, ampak zato, da zagotovijo nekaterim panogam svoje industrije "dodatno" zaščito pred izdelki iz tujine.
In its report the Commission explains, however, that certain 'emerging' countries are applying countervailing duties not to counteract illegal trading practices but to give some of their industrial sectors extra protection from overseas products.