natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
K. ker bi se za vse države, ki prejemajo predpristopno pomoč EU, pa tudi za celovito upoštevanje Romunije in Bolgarije pojavila potreba po dodatnih 150 milijardah EUR v tekočem obdobju financiranja na osnovi veljavne sheme strukturne politike; ker vse države, ki prejemajo predpristopno pomoč, vendarle ne bodo pristopile istočasno,
K. whereas all countries receiving EU pre-accession aid as well as the fully consideration of Romania and Bulgaria would require an additional EUR 150 billion in the current funding period on the basis of the structural policy scheme in force, whereas, however, the accession of all countries receiving pre-accession aid will not happen simultaneously,
L. ker je pristop Romunije in Bolgarije povečal območje EU-25, ki je upravičeno do strukturnih sredstev EU, za 9 % in njeno prebivalstvo za 6 % ter za 5 % zmanjšal njen BDP na prebivalca; ker bi pristop Hrvaške povečal površino EU-27 za 1,3 % in njeno prebivalstvo za 0,9%, medtem ko bi za 0,6 % zmanjšal njen BDP na prebivalca; ker bi pristop Turčije povečal površino EU-27 za 18,3 % in njeno prebivalstvo za 14,7 %, medtem ko bi za 10,5 % zmanjšal njen BDP na prebivalca; ker bi pristop ostalih držav zahodnega Balkana povečal površino EU-27 za 4,8 % in njeno prebivalstvo za 4 %, medtem ko bi za 3,5 % zmanjšal njen BDP na prebivalca,
L. whereas the accession of Romania and Bulgaria increased the area of EU-25 eligible for EU structural funding by 9% and its population by 6% and decreased its per-capita GDP by 5%; whereas the accession of Croatia would increase the area of EU-27 by 1.3% and its population by 0.9%, while it would decrease its per-capita GDP by 0.6%; whereas the accession of Turkey would increase the area of EU-27 by 18.3% and its population by 14.7%, while it would decrease its per-capita GDP by 10.5%; whereas the accession of the other Western Balkan states would increase the area of EU-27 by 4.8% and its population by 4%, while it would decrease its per-capita GDP by 3,5%,
M. ker obstaja nujna potreba po institucionalnih, finančnih in političnih reformah institucij Evropske unije, na katerih sloni integracijska sposobnost EU; ker je pristop k EU v celoti odvisen od izpolnjevanja köbenhavnskih meril in torej od demokratičnega razvoja v državah iz uvodne izjave I,
M. whereas there is an urgent need for institutional, financial and political reform of the institutions of the European Union which underpin the EU's integration capacity; whereas accession to the EU is fully dependent on meeting the Copenhagen criteria and thus on democratic development in the countries mentioned in recital I,
N. ker bi v Evropski uniji s 34 državami članicami, izračunano po obstoječih pravilih, Hrvaška prejela le 7 % dodatnih strukturnih sredstev, ostale države zahodnega Balkana, ki trenutno prejemajo predpristopno pomoč, bi prejele 9,2 %, medtem ko bi samo Turčija prejela 63 %,
N. whereas, in a 34-member state European Union, Croatia would account for only 7% of this additional structural funding, calculated under existing rules, and the other Western Balkan states currently receiving pre-accession assistance for 9.2%, while Turkey alone would receive 63%,
O. ker pristop držav zahodnega Balkana, če jih obravnavamo posamično, zaradi njihove velikosti, števila prebivalstva in gospodarske razvitosti, tudi v okviru veljavnega finančnega okvira ne bi povzročil niti nobenih statističnih učinkov na upravičenost regij v državah članicah, niti ne bi vodil v drastične finančne učinke na kohezijsko politiko v sedanji Uniji s 27 državami članicami; ker bi Hrvaška, s katero so pogajanja najbolj napredovala in je z družbeno–gospodarskega vidika celo bolj razvita od nekaterih sedanjih držav članic, primerjalno gledano predstavljala najmanjše finančno breme za Unijo, glede na velikost, število prebivalstva in raven gospodarske razvitosti države ter ne bi imela nobenega statističnega učinka v zvezi z upravičenostjo območij na regionalni in nacionalni ravni, celo v sedanjem finančnem obdobju,
O. whereas the accession of the Western Balkan states taken individually, even during the current financial framework, would not give rise to any statistical effect on the eligibility of Member State regions, nor would it lead to any dramatic financial impact on the cohesion policy of the current Union of 27 Member States due to their size, population and economic development; whereas, Croatia, with which negotiations are the furthest advanced and which is even more developed in socio-economic terms than some current Member States, would, in comparative terms, represent the smallest financial burden for the Union, given the country's size, population and level of economic development and would not give rise to any statistical effect in relation to the eligible areas at regional and national level, even in the current financial period,
P. ker bi s pristopom Turčije evropska kohezijska politika dobila povsem nove razsežnosti, saj se ta politika ni še nikoli prej izvajala na državi podobne velikosti, ki bi imela primerljivo nizko raven gospodarske razvitosti in tako velike regionalne razlike,
P. whereas the accession of Turkey would lend an entirely new scale to EU cohesion policy, which has never yet been applied to a country of such a size, with such a low level of economic development and such large regional disparities,
Q. ker je bilo v sklepih predsedstva Evropskega sveta junija 2006 poudarjeno, da bi morala EU pri sprejemanju novih držav članic ostati sposobna ohranjati dinamiko evropskega povezovanja ter da bi bilo treba storiti vse, da se zaščiti kohezija in učinkovitost Unije,
Q. whereas, the Presidency Conclusions of the June 2006 European Council pointed out that, in accepting new Member States, the EU should remain in a position to maintain the dynamic of European integration and 'that every effort should be made to protect the cohesion and the effectiveness of the Union',
R. ker Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 8. novembra 2006 poziva, naj se pred kakršno koli nadaljnjo širitvijo podrobno preučijo učinki na proračun EU, pri čemer se upošteva prihodnji razvoj pomembnejših političnih področij, kot sta kmetijstvo in kohezijska politika,
R. whereas, in its Communication of 8 November 2006, the Commission calls for the effects on the EU budget to be examined in detail ahead of any further enlargements, taking into account the future development of relevant policy areas such as agriculture and cohesion policy,
S. ker bo o regionalni politiki, ki predstavlja eno največjih proračunskih postavk EU, potekala še posebej temeljita razprava – nenazadnje v zvezi z merili učinkovitosti – pri reviziji finančnega okvira EU, ki je predvidena za 2008–2009,
S. whereas regional policy, as one of the largest EU budget items, will come under particularly intensive discussion – not least as regards efficiency criteria – in the review of the EU financial framework scheduled for 2008-2009,
T. ker je v Uniji, ki se še vedno širi, bolj kot kadarkoli potrebna učinkovitost politik Skupnosti, saj sta učinkovitost kohezijske politike in njena že dokazana dejanska dodana vrednost v veliki meri odvisni od razpoložljivih finančnih sredstev; ker bi bilo zato treba posvetiti kar največjo pozornost reviziji sistema virov lastnih sredstev Skupnosti,
T. whereas, in a still enlarging Union, the efficiency of Community policies is needed more than ever, the effectiveness of cohesion policy and its demonstrated genuine added-value being heavily dependent on the financial resources available; whereas, therefore, the utmost attention should be paid to the review of the Community's system of own resources,
3. meni, da prihodnje širitve ne smejo voditi v to, da vedno večje število regij ne bo več upravičeno do sredstev iz kohezijske politike v okviru veljavnega cilja 1 zaradi statističnega učinka in ne da bi se obstoječa neskladja dejansko odpravila;
Considers that future enlargements must not lead to ever more regions ceasing to be eligible for cohesion policy funding under the current Objective 1 as a result of the statistical effect and without existing disparities really being eliminated;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi natančno analizo učinka, da se lahko ustrezno oceni vse posledice pristopa Romunije in Bolgarije za strukturno politiko;
Calls on the Commission to present a detailed impact analysis in order to enable due assessment of the full effects on structural policy of the accession of Romania and Bulgaria;
8. meni, da obstaja potreba po študijah, ki temeljijo na izkušnjah, pridobljenih s preteklimi širitvami, in vključujejo družbeno-gospodarske izboljšave, do katerih bo prišlo v tokratnem programskem obdobju, da se razvijejo scenariji za prihodnje financiranje kohezijske politike EU;
Considers that there is a need for ongoing studies that are based on experience gained with previous enlargements and that include the socio-economic improvements that will take place during the current programming period, in order to develop scenarios for the future financing of EU cohesion policy;
22. poziva, da se kot vir sofinanciranja strukturnih sredstev bolj uporabljajo zasebna sredstva ter da se v skladu z najboljšimi praksami znatno poenostavi zasebno sofinanciranje projektov in programov iz strukturnih skladov;
Calls for more use to be made of private funds as a source of co-financing structural funding, and for the private co-financing of projects and programmes under the Structural Funds to be significantly simplified in line with best practice;
24. ugotavlja, da je uspeh kohezijske politike povezan z nacionalnimi gospodarskimi politikami in da s tem v zvezi izvajanje nacionalnih akcijskih načrtov za lizbonsko strategijo še posebej vpliva na uspeh kohezijske politike;
Notes that the success of cohesion policy is linked to national economic policies and that in this connection the implementation of the National Action Plans for the Lisbon Strategy has a particular influence on the success of cohesion policy;
26. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se v okviru prihodnjih programov za regionalno konkurenčnost in za ozemeljsko sodelovanje, financiranje tesneje osredotoči na evropeizacijo regionalnega gospodarstva in na infrastrukturo evropskega pomena;
Urges the Commission to ensure that, in the framework of future programmes for regional competitiveness and for territorial cooperation, funding is concentrated more closely on the Europeanisation of the regional economy and on infrastructures of European importance;
Tema tega samoiniciativnega poročila je vprašanje, kako bodo bodoče širitve EU vplivale na uspešnost kohezijske politike in kako je treba le-to oblikovati v prihodnosti, da bo mogoče še naprej dosegati želene učinke izravnavanja in rasti.
This own-initiative report is concerned with how future enlargements of the EU will impact on the effectiveness of the cohesion policy and how that policy should be shaped in future to continue to achieve the desired effects in terms of equilibrium and growth.
Evropski parlament je s podporo več političnih skupin pred kratkim v svojem poročilu o strategiji širitve zahteval, da se pri prihodnjih širitvah bolj upošteva absorpcijsko sposobnost Skupnosti.
In its recent report on enlargement strategy the European Parliament issued an appeal, with the support of a number of political groups, for greater account to be taken of the Community's absorption capacity in connection with further enlargements.
„Poročilo o strateškem dokumentu Komisije o širitvi za leto 2005“, P6_TA(2006)0096 , glasovanje na plenarnem zasedanju 16. marca 2006; „Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporočilu Komisije o strategiji širitve in o glavnih izzivih za obdobje 2006–2007“, P6 _TA-PROV(2006)0568, ki temelji na A6-0436/2006 , glasovanje na plenarnem zasedanju 13. decembra 2006; Resolucija o institucionalnih vidikih sposobnosti Evropske unije za vključevanje novih držav članic, P6-TA-PROV(2006)0569 , ki temelji na A6-0393/2006 , glasovanje na plenarnem zasedanju 13. decembra 2006.
“Report on the Commission's 2005 enlargement strategy paper” P6_TA(2006)0096 , plenary vote of 16 March 2006; “Resolution on the Commission communication on Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2006 – 2007”, P6_TA-PROV(2006)0568 , based on A6-0436/2006 , plenary vote of 13 December 2006; Resolution on the institutional aspects of the European Union's capacity to integrate new Member States P6_TA-PROV(2006)0569 , based on A6-0393/2006 , plenary vote of 13 December 2006.
Pri tem je treba upoštevati sposobnost Unije, da zasleduje cilj socialne, gospodarske in ozemeljske kohezije v luči proračunskih danosti.
This must be taken to include the Union’s ability to pursue the objective of social, economic and territorial cohesion in the light of budgetary realities.
Tudi strukturno politiko je treba ponovno preučiti v luči revizije proračuna EU, predvidene za 2008/2009 (poročilo Komisije o reviziji je predvideno za začetek leta 2009).
Structural policy also needs to be considered in the light of the review of the EU budget scheduled for 2008/2009 (Commission review report due in early 2009).
Sedaj, ko je učinkovitost postala eno od zadev v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o proračunu 2007-2013, bo o strukturni in regionalni politiki, ki je ena največjih proračunskih postavk, potekala še posebej poglobljena razprava.
Now that efficiency has been made an issue in the Interinstitutional Agreement on the budget 2007-2013, structural and regional policy, as one of the largest budget items, will be subject to particularly intensive discussion.
Medinstitucionalni sporazum med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Evropsko komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (UL C 139, 14.6.2006, str.
Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (OJ 2006/C 139, p.
Zato je pomembno, da se začne z razmislekom o načinih in sredstvih za izboljšanje učinkovitosti kohezijske politike.
It is therefore important to start thinking of ways and means to boost the efficiency of cohesion policy.
Kot izzive za prihodnost to poročilo najprej analizira pristop Romunije in Bolgarije 1. januarja 2007.
This report will start by looking at the accession of Romania and Bulgaria on 1 January 2007 as challenges for the future.
Pristop teh dveh držav sicer ozko gledano ne sodi med „prihodnje širitve“, saj je ta krog širitve že vključen v novi finančni perspektivi za programsko obdobje 2007-2013.
These accessions do not strictly speaking count as “future enlargement”, since this round of enlargement has already been incorporated in the new financial perspective for the 2007-2013 programming period.
S stališča regionalne in strukturne politike pa je vseeno treba upoštevati, da statistični učinek šibke gospodarske moči teh dveh držav na upravičenost drugih regij do pomoči še ni bil izračunan in se bo pojavil šele po letu 2014.
However, it is significant from the point of view of regional and structural policy that the statistical effect of these economically weak countries regarding the eligibility of other regions has not yet been calculated and will only make itself felt from 2014 onwards.
Izraz „prihodnje“ širitve se nanaša tudi na države z uradnim statusom kandidatke, s katerimi je Evropska unija že začela pristopna pogajanja, čeprav so le-ta odprt proces, torej na Turčijo in Hrvaško .
The term “future” enlargements also covers those countries with official candidate status with which the European Union has already begun accession negotiations, albeit on an open-ended basis, namely Turkey and Croatia .
Druge države zahodnega Balkana (nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija, Albanija, Bosna in Hercegovina, Črna gora, Srbija (vključno s Kosovom)) se obravnavajo kot potencialne kandidatke za pristop in so tudi – tako kot države kandidatke – že zdaj prejemnice iz instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA).
The other countries of the Western Balkans (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia (including Kosovo)) also count as potential candidates, and are also – like the candidate countries – in receipt of the IPA (Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance).
Makedonija je 22. marca 2004 vložila prošnjo za pristop k Evropski uniji in je trenutno edina država zahodnega Balkana, ki ima status kandidatke.
Macedonia applied on 22 March 2004 for accession to the European Union and is currently the only country of the Western Balkans to enjoy candidate status.
Zgoraj omenjenih devet držav pristopnic in kandidatk bomo v nadaljevanju skupaj imenovali DPK-9.
The above-mentioned nine acceding and candidate countries will hereafter be referred to collectively as the ACC-9.
To poročilo zadeva DPK-9 kot celoto, saj bi lahko vse postale članice EU v srednjem roku, čeprav ne nujno vse naenkrat.
This report concerns the ACC-9 as a whole, all of which could become members of the EU in the medium term, though not necessarily at the same time.
Podatki, ki so bili uporabljeni pri pripravi tega poročila, vseeno razlikujejo med posameznimi DPK, ki se obravnavajo v skupinah glede na njihov status v pogajanjih.
However, the material on which this report is based distinguishes between the various ACCs, which are dealt with together in groups depending on their negotiating status.
Druge države, s katerimi je EU podpisala sporazume o partnerstvu (Ukrajina, Rusija) ali so vključene v Evropski sosedski in partnerski instrument (ENPI), v to poročilo niso vključene, saj so potencialne kandidatke za vstop le v zelo dolgoročni perspektivi.
Other states with which the EU has concluded partnership agreements (Ukraine, Russia) or which are included in the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI), are not covered in this report, since they only have a very long-term prospect of being potential candidate countries.
Okvir za prihodnjo regionalno politiko
Framework for future regional policy
Napredek pri zbliževanju v EU
Progress on convergence in the EU
Evropska kohezijska politika ima za seboj kar nekaj uspehov, kot primer velja omeniti podporo širitvi EU na jug.
European cohesion policy has achieved major successes, most notably in its support for the southern enlargement of the EU.
Po zaslugi kumulativnih učinkov strukturnih skladov so BDP Grčije, Portugalske in Irske med leti 1989 in 1999 narasli za 10 odstotnih točk s 63,5 % na več kot 70 % povprečja EU.
Thanks to the cumulative effects of the Structural Fund, GDP in Greece, Portugal and Ireland rose between 1989 and 1999 by 10% from 63.5% to over 70% of the EU average.
Mnoge izmed regij v bivših kandidatkah so sedaj zrasle čez prag 75 % oziroma 90 %.
Many of the former candidate regions have now passed the 75% or 90% thresholds.
Širitev s 15 na 25 držav članic je povečala površino EU za 23 %, število prebivalstva za 20 %, dodano vrednost pa samo za 5 %.
The enlargement from 15 to 25 Member States meant that the EU grew by 23% in area and by 20% in population, but by only 5% in terms of added value.
Čeprav je povprečni dohodek EU-10 uspel narasti s 44 % povprečnega dohodka EU-15 v letu 1997 na 50 % v letu 2005
While the average income of the EU-10 managed to rise from 44% of EU-15 average income in 1997 to 50% in 2005
Nekatere gospodarske ustanove menijo, da bi se lahko rast v državah EU-10 deloma precej zmanjšala, kar bi še bolj upočasnilo proces zbliževanja.
Some economic institutes think that the growth of some EU-10 states may significantly fall off, thus slowing down the convergence process even more.
„Die aktuelle Wirtschaftslage in den Ländern Mittel-, Ost- und Südeuropas“, [Trenutne gospodarske razmere v državah srednje, vzhodne in južne Evrope], Dunajski inštitut za mednarodne gospodarske študije, julij 2005; podatki iz EUROSTAT 2006.
“Die aktuelle Wirtschaftslage in den Länder Mittel-, Ost- und Südeuropas”, [The current economic situation in the countries of Central, Eastern and Southern Europe], Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, July 2005; data from Eurostat, 2006.
Vendar tudi v EU-15 še mnogo strukturnih težav ni bilo rešenih, zaradi globalizacije pa nastajajo nove težave s podjetniškimi lokacijami.
Even within the EU-15, however, many structural problems have still not been resolved, and new problems with business location are arising as a result of globalisation.
Veliko regij je bilo prizadetih zaradi zapiranja podjetij in visoke nezaposlenosti.
Many regions have been affected by business closures and high unemployment.
Zgoraj omenjeno zbliževanje gospodarske moči EU-10 in EU-15 je deloma rezultat relativno šibke rasti v "starih" EU-15.
The above-mentioned convergence of the EU-10's economic performance with that of the EU-15 is partly the result of a relatively weak growth in the “old” EU-15.
V večini držav članic gospodarsko zbliževanje bremenijo proračunske težave.
In most Member States, economic convergence is fraught with budgetary problems.
Šest novih držav članic (Poljska, Češka, Madžarska, Slovaška, Malta in Ciper) je prekršilo pakt stabilnosti in rasti.
Six of the new Member States (Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Malta and Cyprus) have infringed the Stability and Growth Pact
„The new Member States and the Stability and Growth Pact: needs for adapting in the prospect of euro area membership?“, [Nove države članice in pakt o stabilnosti in rasti: potreba po prilagoditvi perspektive za članstvo v območju evra?] priloga k poročilu EUROFRAME-EFN, pomlad 2006.
"The new Member States and the Stability and Growth Pact: needs for adapting in the prospect of euro area membership?", Appendix EUROFRAME-EFN report, spring 2006. , while the larger Member States, such as Germany and France, have in recent years been running budget deficits exceeding Stability Pact limits.
Vse to negativno vpliva na možnosti in pripravljenost mnogih držav članic prispevati k proračunu EU in s tem h kohezijski politiki.
This will have a negative impact on the extent to which many Member States are able and willing to make contributions to the EU budget and thus to cohesion policy.
Poleg tega bodo na prihodnjo javno porabo vplivale tudi demografske spremembe.
This is compounded by the prospect of the public expenditure occasioned by demographic change.
Sporočilo Sveta ministrov za gospodarstvo in finance z dne 13. februarja 2006
A communication of the Council of Economic and Finance Ministers of 13 February 2006
„The impact of ageing on public expenditure: projections for the EU-25 Member States on pensions, health care, long-term care, education and unemployment transfers (2004-2050)“, [Vpliv staranja prebivalstva na javne izdatke: projekcije za države članice EU-25 na področju transferjev za pokojnine, zdravstveno varstvo, dolgotrajno oskrbo, izobraževanje in brezposelnost (2004-2050)], Evropska komisija, generalni direktorat za gospodarske in finančne zadeve, posebno poročilo št. 1/2006, 13.2.2006. predvideva, da bo delež javne porabe, vezane na staranje prebivalstva, v povprečju EU narasel za 4 odstotne točke BDP in da bo povprečna letna stopnja rasti za EU-25 znatno padla, in sicer z 2,2 % v obdobju 2004-2010 na 1,4 % v obdobju 2030-2050.
"The impact of ageing on public expenditure: projections for the EU-25 Member States on pensions, health care, long-term care, education and unemployment transfers (2004-2050)", European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and financial Affairs, Special Report n° 1/2006, 13.2.2006. predicts a 4% increase in average EU expenditure on the elderly as a proportion of GDP accompanied by significant fall in the average growth rate for the EU-25 from 2.2% in the 2004-2010 period to 1.4% between 2030 and 2050.
Absorpcijska sposobnost in izziv prihodnjih širitev
Absorption capacity and the challenge of future enlargements
V enem od sklepov predsedstva EU
A decision of the EU Presidency