natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlogi sprememb, opisani v tem poročilu, v poslovnik deloma vnašajo najboljšo prakso, ki jo je razvila uprava Parlamenta
In part, the proposals developed in this report enshrine in the Rules best practice as developed by Parliament's administration
Dosedanja praksa je opisana v navodilih služb Parlamenta, objavljenih v obvestilu poslancem PE 368.027 v01-00. .
The practice which is presently followed is outlined in a note by Parliament's services, published in the notice to members PE 368.027 v01-00. .
Inovativni so do te mere, da zagotavljajo instrumente, ki so enostavni za uporabo ter v celoti spoštujejo zakonske pravice in dostojanstvo izvoljenih poslancev Parlamenta.
Insofar as they are innovative, they are designed to provide instruments which are both simple to apply and fully respect the statutory rights and the dignity of elected Members of Parliament.
Zaradi preglednosti je predlagana tudi prerazporeditev ustreznih določb v kronološkem vrstnem redu različnih stopenj postopka.
Additionally, for the sake of transparency, a rearrangement of the relevant provisions is proposed, following the chronological order of the different steps of the procedure.
Predlog spremembe 1 uvaja obstoječo prakso pozivanja pristojnih organov držav članic, da se poudari potreba po pravočasnem obveščanju Parlamenta in s tem zagotovi ustrezno delovanje novoizvoljenega Parlamenta od njegove ustanovne seje.
Amendment 1 implements the existing practice of addressing the Member States' authorities in order to draw attention to the need for timely notification in order to ensure the proper functioning of the newly elected Parliament as from its constituent session.
Poleg tega je primerno države članice opozoriti, da so pred obvestitvijo Parlamenta dolžne preveriti morebitne primere nezdružljivosti.
Additionally, it would appear appropriate that Member States be reminded of their responsibility to verify the absence of any incompatibility prior to making any notification.
Predlog spremembe 2 prinaša novost, katere cilj je izvoljenemu poslancu, ki opravlja funkcijo, nezdružljivo s funkcijo poslanca Evropskega parlamenta, preprečiti udeležbo pri sprejemanju odločitev Parlamenta.
Amendment 2 suggests an innovation with the aim of avoiding the situation where an elected Member holding an incompatible office can participate in Parliament's decisions.
V skladu s pogoji predloga spremembe bi moral vsak poslanec pred nastopom mandata v Parlamentu podati pisno izjavo iz drugega pododstavka sedanjega člena 3(2) o tem, da ne opravlja funkcije, ki v skladu s členom 7 akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 ni združljiva s funkcijo poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
According to the terms of the proposed amendment, the declaration presently required under Rule 3(2), second subparagraph, stating that the Member does not hold any office which under Article 7 of the Act of 20 September 1976 is incompatible with that of a Member of the European Parliament, would have to be delivered by each Member prior to taking his seat in Parliament.
Predhodna pisna izjava je zato pogoj za pravico do polnopravne udeležbe na sejah Parlamenta in njegovih teles.
The right to take his seat in Parliament and on its bodies and to enjoy all the rights attaching thereto would be subject to the prior delivery of this declaration.
Določba iz drugega pododstavka člena 3(2), da se v primeru, če izjava ni bila podana, veljavnost mandata poslanca ne potrdi, bi ostala v veljavi.
The provision laid down in Rule 3(2), second subparagraph, stating that in the absence of such a declaration the validity of the mandate cannot be confirmed, would remain in force.
Vsekakor se zdi primerno, da se področje uporabe te izjave omeji na nezdružljivosti v skladu s členom 7(1) in (2), ker lahko Parlament v primeru nezdružljivosti na podlagi določb zakonodaje države članice v skladu s členom 7(3) deluje po obvestilu pristojnega organa države članice (glej predlog spremembe 4).
It appears, however, appropriate to reduce the scope of this declaration to incompatibilities pursuant to Article 7(1) and (2), because in the event of incompatibilities which are provided for in the law of a Member State in accordance with Article 7(3), Parliament is acting upon due notification by the competent authority of that Member State (see amendment 4).
Ker so pomembna dejstva v primeru nezdružljivosti na splošno javno znana, je predhodna pisna izjava zadostno zagotovilo, da v Parlamentu ni poslancev, ki bi opravljali funkcijo, nezdružljivo s funkcijo poslanca Parlamenta.
As the relevant facts in a case of incompatibility are generally a matter of public knowledge, a preliminary declaration of this kind appears to be a sufficient safeguard for ensuring that no Member holding an incompatible office sits in Parliament.
Če poslanec odkloni podpis takšne izjave pred nastopom mandata, je to zadosten razlog za sum o morebitni nezdružljivosti, zaradi česar se zadevnemu poslancu upravičeno ne priznajo poslanske pravice, dokler ne poda izjave ali se zadeva drugače ne pojasni.
On the other hand, in the event that a Member declines to deliver such a declaration before taking his seat, this is a sufficient ground for suspecting that there might be a case of incompatibility, thus justifying preventing the Member in question from enjoying his rights until he has delivered the declaration or the matter has been clarified otherwise.
Druga novost predloga spremembe 2 je izrecna pooblastitev predsednika Parlamenta, da obvesti Parlament, kadar je na podlagi javno znanih dejstev ugotovljeno, da poslanec opravlja funkcijo, nezdružljivo s funkcijo poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
The second innovation in Amendment 2 is an explicit power conferred on the President of Parliament to inform Parliament when it is established from facts verifiable from sources available to the public that a Member holds an incompatible office.
V skladu z določbami akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 bi Parlamentu to omogočilo, da ugotovi sprostitev sedeža.
In compliance with the provisions of the Act of 20 September 1976 this would allow Parliament to establish that a vacancy exists.
Predlog spremembe 3 prinaša zgolj tehnično prilagoditev, saj pisna izjava v aktu z dne 20. septembra 1976 ni nujno potrebna.
Amendment 3 proposes only a technical adjustment as the declaration in question is not necessarily required by the Act of 20 September 1976.
Ta pogoj je postopkovno pravilo, ki ga je Parlament zakonito sprejel v svojem poslovniku zaradi pravilnega izvajanja določb akta.
This requirement is a procedural rule which Parliament has legitimately established in its Rules of Procedure in order to correctly implement the provisions of the Act.
Predlogi sprememb 4, 5 in 6 so namenjeni le uskladitvi določb poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta z določbami akta z dne 20. septembra 1976, kot je bil spremenjen s sklepoma z dne 25. junija in 23. septembra 2002.
Amendments 4, 5 and 6 merely seek to adapt the provisions of Parliament's Rules of Procedure to the provisions of the Act of 20 September 1976, as amended by the decisions of 25 June and 23 September 2002.
Predlog spremembe 7 ponuja razlago člena 11 o najstarejšem poslancu, ki slednjemu omogoča, da Parlamentu predlaga rešitev vsakega očitnega primera nezdružljivosti, ki se pojavi med ustanovno sejo.
Amendment 7 suggests an interpretation of Rule 11 concerning the oldest Member, allowing him to propose to Parliament to settle any clear case of incompatibility should it arise in the course of its Constitutive sitting.
o spremembi člena 3 in člena 4 poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta
on the amendment of Rules 3 and 4 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Pripravljavec mnenja načeloma soglaša s stališčem poročevalca pristojnega odbora.
Your draftsman agrees on the whole with the approach taken by the rapporteur of the committee responsible.
Meni namreč, da se mora pravica Evropskega parlamenta, da preverja veljavnost mandata svojih članov, kot določa člen 12 akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 (in nadaljnje spremembe), primerno odražati v njegovem poslovniku, s čimer se zagotovi, da Parlamentvedno deluje v zakoniti sestavi.
Your draftsman considers that the European Parliament's right to verify the credentials of its own Members, as enshrined in Article 12 of the Act of 20 September 1976 (as subsequently amended) should be fully reflected in the European Parliament's Rules of Procedure, so as to ensure that Parliament is acting as a lawfully constituted body at all times.
Pripravljavec mnenja odobrava mehanizme, ki jih je poročevalec pristojnega odbora predlagal za reševanje težav praktičnega značaja (predvsem glede odnosov z nacionalnimi organi), ki so se pojavile v zvezi z obstoječimi pravili.
Your draftsman is in favour of the methods suggested by the rapporteur to remedy the practical difficulties (particularly with regard to relations with national authorities) which have arisen under the existing rules.
Vendar pa pripravljavec mnenja predlaga nekatere spremembe člena 3 poslovnika, ki bi jih bilo treba upoštevati, da se zagotovijo nova dovolj prilagodljiva in izčrpna pravila o preverjanju veljavnosti mandata.
However, your draftsman suggests certain modifications of Rule 3 of the Rules of Procedure which should be taken into consideration to ensure that the new rules on the verification of credentials are sufficiently flexible and comprehensive.
Medtem ko je namen predloga spremembe 1 opozoriti organe držav članic, da je treba pravočasno sporočiti imena izvoljenih poslancev, predlog spremembe 2 zadeva vsebino in učinke izjave, ki se trenutno zahteva v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 3(2).
Amendment 1 seeks to draw the attention of the Member States' authorities to the need for timely notification of the names of the Members, while amendment 2 concerns the content and effects of the declaration currently required under the second subparagraph of Rule 3(2).
Glede predloga spremembe 2 je treba najprej pojasniti, da nezdružljivost obstaja le v primerih, določenih v členu 7(1) in (2) akta z dne 20. septembra 1976, ne pa tudi v primerih, predvidenih v nacionalni zakonodaji (glej člen 7(3) akta z dne 20. septembra 1976).
With regard to the latter amendment, it should be clarified, firstly, that incompatibility exists only in the cases specified in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 7 of the 1976 Act, and not in any additional cases specified in national law (see Article 7(3) of the 1976 Act).
Drugič, če poslanec ne podpiše zgoraj navedene izjave in zato ne more opravljati svojega mandata, se mu določi rok, v katerem si lahko vzame obdobje za razmislek, ki traja do prvega rednega zasedanja po obvestilu o izvolitvi zadevnega poslanca.
Secondly, while on the one hand failure to submit the declaration in question disqualifies the Member from exercising his powers, on the other hand a deadline is provided to allow Members a period of reflection, to coincide with the first ordinary sitting after the notification of the election of the Member in question.
Namen je, da se Evropskemu parlamentu v določenem roku zagotovi delovanje v zakoniti sestavi.
This amendment is intended to ensure by a set deadline that Parliament's plenary is lawfully constituted.
Tretjič, če izjava ni podpisana v navedenem roku ali če gre za primer očitne nezdružljivosti, se predlaga uporaba postopka za uradno razglasitev prostega sedeža.
Thirdly, if the declaration is not signed by the deadline set, or, more generally, in the event of clear incompatibility, it is proposed that a procedure be applied for officially declaring the seat vacant.
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Predlogi sprememb
Amendments by Parliament
Po volitvah v Evropski parlament predsednik povabi pristojne organe držav članic, da Parlament nemudoma obvestijo o imenih izvoljenih poslancev, tako da lahko vsi poslanci nastopijo svoj mandat v Parlamentu od začetka prve seje po volitvah.
Following the elections to Parliament, the President shall invite the competent authorities of the Member States to notify Parliament without delay of the names of the elected Members so that all Members may take their seats in Parliament with effect from the opening of the first sitting following the elections.
(Predlog spremembe deloma navaja besedilo sedanjega člena 3(6), ki bo v primeru sprejetja predloga spremembe črtan.)
(This amendment partly reproduces the wording of the current Rule 3(6), which will be deleted if this amendment is adopted.)
Vsak poslanec, o čigar izvolitvi je bil Parlament obveščen, pred nastopom mandata v Parlamentu poda pisno izjavo, da ne opravlja funkcije, ki v smislu člena 7(1) in (2) Akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 ni združljiva s funkcijo poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
Every Member whose election has been notified to Parliament shall make a written declaration, before taking his seat in Parliament, that he does not hold any office incompatible with that of a Member of the European Parliament, within the meaning of Article 7(1) and (2) of the Act of 20 September 1976.
Če izjava ni podpisana do prvega rednega zasedanja po obvestilu o izvolitvi zadevnega poslanca, se uporabi druga alineja tega odstavka.
Where no such declaration has been signed before the first ordinary sitting after the notification of the election of the Member concerned, the second subparagraph of this paragraph shall apply.
V primeru očitne nezdružljivosti v smislu člena 7(1) in (2) Akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 predsednik obvesti Parlament, ki potrdi, da je sedež prost.
In the event of clear incompatibility within the meaning of Article 7(1) and (2) of the Act of 20 September 1976, the President shall inform Parliament, which shall establish that a vacancy exists.
(Predlog spremembe deloma navaja besedilo sedanjega člena 3(5), ki bo v primeru sprejetja predloga spremembe črtan.)
(This amendment partly reproduces the wording of the current Rule 3(5), which will be deleted if this amendment is adopted.)
Če se med predsedovanjem najstarejšega poslanca pojavi vprašanje v zvezi s preverjanjem veljavnosti mandatov poslancev, ta zadevo preda odboru, pristojnemu za preverjanje veljavnosti mandatov poslancev.
If a question relating to the verification of credentials is raised when the oldest Member is in the chair , he shall refer the matter to the committee responsible for the verification of credentials.
Najstarejši poslanec izvaja pristojnosti predsednika iz drugega pododstavka člena 3(-1a).
The oldest Member shall exercise the powers of the President referred to in the second subparagraph of Rule 3, paragraph -1a.
Katerokoli drugo vprašanje, ki se pojavi med predsedovanjem najstarejšega poslanca v zvezi s preverjanjem veljavnosti mandatov poslancev, se preda odboru, pristojnemu za preverjanje veljavnosti mandatov poslancev.
Any other question relating to the verification of credentials raised when the oldest Member is in the chair shall be referred to the committee responsible for the verification of credentials.
Sprememba členov 3 in 4 poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta
Amendment of Rules 3 and 4 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Obravnavani predlogi sprememb
Proposal(s) for amendment considered
o beli knjigi Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena
on the Commission White Paper on services of general interest
József Szájer , Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov
József Szájer , Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................16
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ...........................................16
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................20
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ...................20
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................24
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ....................24
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................27
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 28
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................32
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism .....................................33
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................35
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ......................................36
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................38
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS..........................................................39
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Bela knjiga o storitvah splošnega pomena“ ( KOM(2004)0374 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'White Paper on services of general interest' ( COM(2004)0374 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Izvajanje programa Skupnosti iz Lizbone: socialne storitve splošnega pomena v Evropski uniji“ ( KOM(2006)0177 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: Social services of general interest in the European Union' ( COM(2006)0177 ),
– ob upoštevanju odločbe Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena
– having regard to Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest
– ob upoštevanju člena 36 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah glede dostopa do storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena,
– having regard to Article 36 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which concerns access to services of general economic interest,
– ob upoštevanju členov 2, 5, 16, 73, 86, 87, 88 in 295 pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 2, 5, 16, 73, 86, 87, 88 and 295 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnih resolucij o storitvah splošnega pomena, zlasti resolucije z dne 13. novembra 2001 o sporočilu Komisije "Storitve splošnega pomena v Evropi"
– having regard to its previous resolutions on services of general interest, particularly its resolution of 13 November 2001 on the Commission communication 'Services of General Interest in Europe'
– ob upoštevanju zakonodajne resolucije z dne 16. februarja 2006 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu
– having regard to its legislative resolution of 16 February 2006 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0061 . ,
Texts adopted , P6_TA(2006)0061 . ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Lizboni 15. in 16. marca 2000, Evropskega sveta v Nici 7., 8. in 9. decembra 2000, Evropskega sveta v Laeknu 14. in 15. decembra 2001 ter Evropskega sveta v Barceloni 15. in 16. marca 2002 o storitvah splošnega pomena,
– having regard to the Conclusions of the Presidency of the Lisbon European Council of 15 and 16 March 2000, the Nice European Council of 7, 8 and 9 December 2000, the Laeken European Council of 14 and 15 December 2001 and the Barcelona European Council of 15 and 16 March 2002 on services of general interest,
- ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti na področju storitev splošnega pomena, zlasti sodbe „Teckal“ z dne 18. novembra 1999
– having regard to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in the field of services of general interest, particularly the Teckal judgment of 18 November 1999
Zadeva C-107/98, Teckal Srl/Comune di Viano in Azienda Gas-Acqua Consorziale (AGAC) di Reggio Emilia, [1999], I-8121. , sodbe „Chronopost“ z dne 3. julija 2003
Case C-107/98, Teckal Srl/Comune di Viano and Azienda Gas-Acqua Consorziale (AGAC) di Reggio Emilia, ECR 1999, I-8121. , the Chronopost judgment of 3 July 2003
Povezane zadeve C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P in C-94/01 P, Chronopost in drugi, ECR [2003], I-6993. , sodbe „Altmark“ z dne 24. julija 2003
Joined cases C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P and C-94/01 P, Chronopost et al., ECR 2003, I-6993. , the Altmark judgment of 24 July 2003
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg/Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, ECR 2003, I-7747. , sodbe „Enirisorse“z dne 27. novembra 2003, sodb „Stadt Halle“ z dne 11. januarja 2005 in dne 13. januarja 2005
Case C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg/Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, ECR 2003, I-7747. , the Enirisorse judgement of 27 November 2003, the Stadt-Halle judgment of 11 January 2005
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje, Odbora za pravne zadeve, Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, Odbora za promet in turizem, Odbora za mednarodno trgovino, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6‑0275/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Culture and Education, the Committee on Legal Affairs, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Transport and Tourism, the Committee on International Trade, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, and Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0275/2006 ),
A. ker pogodbe predvidevajo odprto socialno tržno gospodarstvo in ker med drugim naslednja načela, pomembna v tem kontekstu, predstavljajo referenčni okvir:
A. whereas the Treaties provide for an open social market economy and whereas, amongst others, the following principles stand as terms of reference and are important in this context:
– solidarnost, ki združuje in temelji na ciljih socialne, gospodarske in ozemeljske kohezije ter trajnostnega razvoja,
– solidarity, bringing people together based on the objectives of social, economic and territorial cohesion and sustainable development,
– sodelovanje, ki omogoča čezmejna in evropska prizadevanja iz pogodb in programov EU,
– cooperation, enabling the realisation of the transnational and European aspirations in the Treaties and programmes,
– odprte meje in notranji trg s prostim pretokom oseb, blaga, storitev in kapitala, da bi uresničili gospodarsko in družbeno integracijo ter povečali blagostanje in socialno blaginjo evropskih državljanov,
– open borders and an internal market with the freedom of movement for persons, goods, services and capital, in order to integrate economies and societies and increase wealth and social well-being of European citizens,
– konkurenca , ki bo omogočila dokončno vzpostavitev notranjega trga na podlagi pravil socialno tržnega gospodarstva in konkurenčnega prava, ki je temeljno področje demokratičnega prava, in predvsem, preprečila gospodarsko zlorabo monopolov in gospodarske moči ter zagotovila inovacije, visoko kakovost po dostopnih cenah, raznolikost ponudbe in pravno varstvo potrošnikov,
– competition, enabling the completion of the internal market on the basis of social market economy rules and governed by competition law, which is an essential area of democratic law and, above all, to avoid the abuse of monopolies and economic power and to guarantee innovation, high quality at an affordable price, diversification of consumer choices and legal protection for consumers,