natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija določi časovni okvir, obliko in podrobnosti, ki so potrebni za zbiranje in prenos podatkov, ki jih imajo države članice o izpustih iz razpršenih virov v skladu s postopkom iz člena 19(2).
The Commission shall establish the timeframe, the format and particulars needed for the collection and transmission of information existing in the Member States on releases from diffuse sources in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 19(2).
Komisija določi časovni okvir, obliko in podrobnosti, ki so potrebni za zbiranje in prenos podatkov, ki jih imajo države članice o izpustih iz razpršenih virov v skladu s postopkom iz člena 19(2), pri čemer uporablja mednarodno priznane metodologije, kadar so te na voljo.
The Commission shall establish the timeframe, the format and particulars needed for the collection and transmission of information existing in the Member States on releases from diffuse sources in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 19(2) , using internationally approved methodologies, whenever these are available.
ČLEN 9, NASLOV
ARTICLE 9, TITLE
Zagotavljanje kakovosti
Quality Assurance
Zagotavljanje in ocena kakovosti
Quality Assurance and Assessment
Protokol zahteva nadzor verodostojnosti in ne celotne ocene zagotavljanja kakovosti, ki je zelo velika zahteva (pomislite na težave s sistemom trgovanja z emisijami v EU).
The Protocol demands a plausibility control and not a full Quality Assurance Assessment which is a huge requirement (consider the difficulties with the EU Emissions Trading System).
Razen tega so nekatere zahteve v zvezi z zagotavljanjem kakovosti že določene s pogoji, ki veljajo za dovoljenja za obratovanje.
Moreover, specific requirements concerning quality assurance are already laid down by way of conditions imposed in operating permits.
ČLEN 9, ODSTAVEK 2
ARTICLE 9, PARAGRAPH 2
Kakovost podatkov, ki jih sporočijo nosilci dejavnosti obratov, ocenijo pristojni organi zlasti z vidika njihove pravočasnosti , popolnosti, nezanesljivosti, primerljivosti , doslednosti in preglednosti .
The competent authorities shall assess the quality of the data provided by the operators of the facilities, in particular as to their timeliness, completeness, uncertainty, comparability, consistency and transparency.
Kakovost podatkov, ki jih sporočijo nosilci dejavnosti obratov, ocenijo pristojni organi zlasti z vidika njihove popolnosti, doslednosti in verodostojnosti .
The competent authorities shall assess the quality of the data provided by the operators of the facilities, in particular as to their completeness, consistency and credibility.
ČLEN 9, ODSTAVEK 4, PODODSTAVEK 1 A (novo)
ARTICLE 9, PARAGRAPH 4, SUBPARAGRAPH 1 A (new)
Te smernice so v skladu z mednarodno priznanimi metodologijami, kadar so te na voljo, in so usklajene z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
These guidelines shall be in accordance with internationally approved methodologies, whenever these are available, and shall be consistent with other Community legislation.
Komisija ob pomoči Evropske agencije za okolje zagotovi, da je Evropski RIPO javno dostopen, z objavo podatkov na spletu v skladu s časovnim okvirom, opredeljenim v členu 7(3).
The Commission, assisted by the European Environment Agency, shall make the European PRTR publicly accessible by dissemination on the Internet according to the timeframe set out in Article 7(3).
Komisija ob pomoči Evropske agencije za okolje zagotovi, da je Evropski RIPO javno dostopen, z brezplačno objavo podatkov na spletu v skladu s časovnim okvirom, opredeljenim v členu 7(3).
The Commission, assisted by the European Environment Agency, shall make the European PRTR publicly accessible by dissemination free of charge on the Internet according to the timeframe set out in Article 7(3).
ČLEN 11
ARTICLE 11
Če ima država članica zaupne podatke v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 2003/4/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta , država članica v skladu s členom 7(2) te uredbe v svojem poročilu navede, kateri podatki so bili zadržani in razloge za to, za vsako leto poročanja posebej in za vsak obrat, ki se sklicuje na zaupnost podatkov.
Whenever information is kept confidential by a Member State in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Member State shall indicate in its report according to Article 7(2) of this Regulation for every reporting year separately for each facility claiming confidentiality what type of information has been withheld and for what reason it has been withheld.
Dostop do podatkov se lahko omeji le na temeljih, navedenih v členu 4(1), (2)(b), (c) in (e ) Direktive 2003/4/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ter država članica v skladu s členom 7(2) te uredbe v svojem poročilu navede, kateri podatki so bili zadržani in razloge za to, za vsako leto poročanja posebej in za vsak obrat, ki se sklicuje na zaupnost podatkov.
Access to information may only be limited on the grounds mentioned in Article 4(1) and (2 )( b), (c) and (e) of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, and the Member State shall indicate in its report according to Article 7(2) of this Regulation for every reporting year separately for each facility claiming confidentiality what type of information has been withheld and for what reason it has been withheld.
Direktiva 2003/4 poskuša izrecno zmanjšati vse omejitve javnega dostopa do podatkov v zvezi z izpusti snovi v okolje na absolutni minimum.
Directive 2003/4 explicitly seeks to limit any restrictions on public access to information regarding releases of substances into the environment to the absolute minimum.
Ker direktiva našteva odstopanja, ki bi lahko obrazložila zaupnost v smislu izpusta onesnaževal, je treba omeniti le ustrezne oddelke iz člena 4.
As the Directive enumerates those exemptions, which might justify confidentiality in the contexts of release of pollutants, only the relevant sections of Art 4 should be mentioned.
Omejitve in strogo izvajanje člena 4, ki je predvideno v Direktivi 2003/4, je treba omeniti v sedanji uredbi, da se dajo državam članicam smernice za izvajanje Uredbe.
The limitations and strict application of Art 4 foreseen in Directive 2003/4 should be mentioned in the present Regulation in order to give the MS guidance in how to apply the Regulation.
Komisija ponovno pregleda podatke, ki jih zagotovijo države članice v skladu s členoma 7 in 16 in, na osnovi dosegljivih podatkov iz zadnjih treh let poročanja, šest mesecev po predstavitvi teh podatkov na spletu objavi poročilo.
The Commission shall review the information provided by Member States according to Article 7 and 16 and shall publish a report every three years based on the information from the last three reporting years available, six months after the presentation of this information on the Internet.
Komisija ponovno pregleda podatke, ki jih zagotovijo države članice v skladu s členoma 7 in 16 in, na osnovi dosegljivih podatkov iz zadnjih treh poročanja, šest mesecev po predstavitvi teh podatkov na spletu objavi poročilo.
The Commission shall review the information provided by Member States according to Articles 7 and 16 and shall publish a report every three years based on the information from the last three reporting years available, six months after the presentation of this information on the Internet.
To poročilo se skupaj z oceno delovanja evropskega RIPO posreduje Evropskemu parlament in Svetu.
This report shall be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council, together with an assessment of the operation of the European PRTR.
Treba je predpisati določbe za spremljanje izvajanja Direktive in oceno delovanja RIPO.
It is essential to lay down provisions for monitoring the implementation of the Directive and assessing the operation of the PRTR.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 3, ČRKA (B), STOLPEC 1
ANNEX I, POINT 3, LETTER (B), COLUMN 1
dnevni kop
Opencast mining
dnevni kop in pridobivanje naravnih kamnin
Opencast mining and quarrying
K rudarstvu štejejo rudniki in kamnolomi.
Mining refers not only to mines but also to quarries.
To je treba pojasniti z dodatkom „pridobivanje naravnih kamnin“.
This must be clarified by adding ‘quarrying’.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 3, ČRKA (B), STOLPEC 2
ANNEX I, POINT 3, LETTER (B), COLUMN 2
če površina, kjer se koplje ruda , obsega 25 hektarov
Where the surface of the area being mined equals 25 hectares
če površina, kjer se dejansko izvaja izkopavanje , obsega 25 hektarov
Where the surface of the area effectively under extractive operation equals 25 hectares
Rudniki in kamnolomi imajo talne rezerve, obnovljena tla po izkopavanju in dejanske postopke za izkopavanje.
Mines and quarries have land reserves, restored land after extraction and effective extractive operations.
Obstoječa opredelitev je netočna in bo vodila do neskončnih interpretacij in neustreznih poročil.
The existing definition is inaccurate and will lead to endless interpretations and irrelevant reporting.
25 hektarov mora jasno veljati za površino, ki se jo dejansko izkopava.
The 25 hectares should clearly apply to the surface under effective extraction.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 4, ČRKA (F) A, NOVA VRSTICA
ANNEX I, POINT 4, LETTER (F) A, NEW ROW
(fa) obrati za skladiščenje nafte, petrokemičnih ali kemičnih izdelkov
( fa ) Installations for the storage of petroleum, petrochemical, or chemical products
z zmogljivostjo 200.000 ton ali več
With a capacity of 200,000 tonnes or more
Emisije iz takšnih obratov za skladiščenje so lahko obsežne, resnično katastrofalne v primerih nesreč, zato mora imeti javnost pravico do seznanjenosti o izpustih pri takšnih dogodkih.
Emissions from such storage facilities may be significant, indeed catastrophic in cases of accidents, and the public should have a right to know about releases from such events.
Ti obrati so v Prilogi I matične Aarhuške konvencije in zanje že veljajo pravila javnega sodelovanja pri izdajanju dovoljenj zanje.
These facilities are in Annex I of the parent Aarhus Convention and thus are already subject to public participation rules during their permitting.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 5, ČRKA (G), STOLPEC 2
ANNEX I, POINT 5, LETTER (G), COLUMN 2
z zmogljivostjo 10.000 m 3 na dan
With a capacity of 10,000 m 3 per day
z zmogljivostjo 1.000 m 3 na dan
With a capacity of 1,000 m 3 per day
Naprave za čiščenje odpadnih voda, ki obratujejo neodvisno, so zajete v okviru te Direktive, že ko je njihova zmogljivost 1,000 m3 dnevno.
Independently operated industrial wastewater treatment plants should be covered by the Directive already when they have a capacity of 1,000 m 3 per day.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 7, ČRKA (B), STOLPEC 2
ANNEX I, POINT 7, LETTER (B), COLUMN 2
s proizvodno zmogljivostjo 1.000 ton rib ali lupinarjev na leto
With a production capacity of 1,000 tonnes of fish or shellfish per year
s proizvodno zmogljivostjo 200 ton rib ali lupinarjev na leto
With a production capacity of 200 tonnes of fish or shellfish per year
Prvotni predlog ureja le največje ribogojnice, ki sedaj obstajajo.
The original proposal covers only the very largest aquaculture farms existing today.
Ob upoštevanju tveganja širjenja bolezni, antibiotikov in drugih težav je treba urediti večji delež trga.
Considering the risk of the spread of diseases, antibiotics and other problems a larger share of the market should be covered.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 9, ČRKA (E), STOLPEC 2
ANNEX I, POINT 9, LETTER (E), COLUMN 2
z zmogljivostjo za ladje, dolge 100 m
With a capacity for ships 100 m long
z zmogljivostjo za ladje, dolge 30 m
With a capacity for ships 30 m long
Težko je najti enostavno stopnjo okoljskega vpliva ladjedelnic, zato ni bilo mogoče preučiti nadomestnih možnosti predloga Komisije.
It is difficult to find an easy measure of environmental impact of shipyards and it has not been possible to examine alternatives to the Commission proposal.
Ker je le neznaten del ribiških plovil nad 100 m, bi se preveč ladjedelnic lahko izognilo obvestilu svojega onesnaževanja.
However, since only a tiny fraction of fishing vessels are above 100m too many shipyards would be able to avoid informing about their pollution.
Dolžina 30 m bi zajemala večino industrijskih ladjedelnic, ne pa tudi delovišč majhnega obsega, ki se uporabljajo za marine.
30 m would cover most industrial shipyards while avoiding small-scale yards used for marinas.
PRILOGA II, VRSTICA 47
ANNEX II, ROW 47
PCDD + PCDF (dioksini + furani) (kot Teq)
PCDD +PCDF (dioxins +furans) (as Teq)
Predlog spremembe Parlamenta
Amendment by Parliament
Mejna raven 0,001 kg (1 g) ne bi dala veliko podatkov o emisijah teh rakotvornih onesnaževal v EU.
A threshold level of 0.001 kg (1 g) will not give much information on the emission of these carcinogenic pollutants in the EU.
Po obveznostih EPER so podjetja že dolžna podati poročilo o emisijah, če te presegajo raven 1 g.
Under EPER obligations, companies already have a requirement to report emissions if they exceed the 1 g level.
To se je kazalo v le 86 poročilih iz 10 držav.
This has resulted in only 86 reports from 10 countries.
Ker emisija dioksinov povzroča težave z zdravjem in varnostjo hrane okoli številnih obratov, kjer se sežigajo odpadki, bi bilo bolje znižati mejno raven na 0,1 g.
As the emission of dioxins causes health and food safety problems around many waste incineration facilities, it would be better to lower the threshold level to 0.1 g.
To bi zajemalo večino obratov za sežiganje odpadkov, ki še nimajo učinkovitih sistemov za čiščenje dimnih plinov.
This would cover most of the waste incineration facilities that do not yet have effective flue gas clean systems.
Zajemalo bi tudi približno 70 odstotkov velikih obratov za predelavo kovin.
It would also cover about 70 percent of the large metal processing industries.
PRILOGA III Podatki o izpustih iz obrata v zrak za vsako onesnaževalo, ki presega mejno vrednost (skladno s Prilogo II)
ANNEX III Release data to air for the facility for each pollutant exceeding threshold value (according to Annex II)
Onesnaževalo 1
Pollutant 1
Onesnaževalo 2
Pollutant 2
Onesnaževalo N
Pollutant N
M: izmerjeno; uporabljena analitična metoda
M: measured; Analytical Method used
C: izračunano; uporabljena metoda izračuna
C: calculated; Calculation Method used
v kg/leto
in kg/year
To mora veljati tudi za poglavja „Podatki o izpustih v vodo...“ in „Podatki o izpustih v tla...“.
This should also be applied to the sections on “Release data to water…” and “Release data to land…”.
Kot je bilo že obravnavano v predlogu spremembe 7, bi to razlikovalo med načrtovanimi, rednimi izpusti in izpusti, ki jih povzročajo naključni dogodki.
As discussed in Amendment 7, this would distinguish between planned, routine releases and those caused by accidental events.
PRILOGA III Podatki o izpustih iz obrata v vodo za vsako onesnaževalo, ki presega mejno vrednost (skladno s Prilogo II)
ANNEX III Release data to water for the facility for each pollutant exceeding threshold value (according to Annex II)
PRILOGA III Podatki o izpustih iz obrata v tla za vsako onesnaževalo, ki presega mejno vrednost (skladno s Prilogo II)
ANNEX III Release data to land for the facility for each pollutant exceeding threshold value (according to Annex II)
MNENJE Odbora za ribištvo
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries
Odbor za ribištvo poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano kot pristojni odbor, da odobri besedilo, ki ga je predlagala Komisija.
The Committee on Fisheries calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to approve the text proposed by Commission.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju Evropskega registra izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/689/EGS in Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju Evropskega registra izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/689/EGS in Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establisment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC
člen 251(2) in [člen 152] ES
Articles 251(2) and 175 EC
Poročevalec(-ka) Datum imenovanja
Rapporteur (s) Date appointed
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola OZN-EKE o registrih izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal v imenu Evropske skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2004)0635 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0635 )
– ob upoštevanju Protokola OZN-EKE o registrih izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal,
– having regard to the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers,
– ob upoštevanju člena 175(1), prvega stavka prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in člena 300(4) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 175(1), Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence and Article 300(4) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0062/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0062/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A6‑0170/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0170/2005 ),
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola OZN-EKE o registrih izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal v imenu Evropske skupnosti
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odškodninah v primerih neizpolnjevanja s pogodbo določenih zahtev o kakovosti za železniški tovorni promet
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compensation in cases of non-compliance with contractual quality requirements for rail freight services
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA......................6
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................3
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0144 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0144 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 71(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0004/2004 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 71(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0004/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0171/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0171/2005 ),
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odškodninah v primerih neizpolnjevanja s pogodbo določenih zahtev o kakovosti za železniški tovorni promet
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compensation in cases of non-compliance with contractual quality requirements for rail freight services
člena 251(2) in 71(1)ES
Articles 251(2) and 71(1)EC
o informacijski družbi
on the information society
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ..................................................14
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION................................14
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije ( KOM(2004)0111 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission (COM(2004) 0111),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 9. in 10. decembra 2004 (15472/04),
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 9 and 10 December 2004 (15472/04),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije "H globalnemu partnerstvu v informacijski družbi: Udejanjanje ženevskih načel" ( KOM(2004)0480 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission "Towards a Global Partnership in the Information Society: Translating the Geneva principles into actions" (COM(2004) 0480),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 8. in 9. marca 2004 (2206/04),
– having regard the Council conclusions of 8 and 9 March 2004 (2206/04),
– ob upoštevanju izjave o načelu in akcijskega načrta o svetovnem vrhu o informacijski družbi, sprejetega 12. decembra 2003,
– having regard to the Declaration of Principles and the Plan of Action of the WSIS adopted on 12 December 2003,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije UNESCA 32C/34 z dne 17. oktobra 2003 o možnostih oblikovanja mednarodnega normativnega instrumenta za kulturno raznolikost,
– having regard to UNESCO Resolution 32C/34 of 17 October 2003 on the Desirability of Drawing up an International Standard-setting Instrument on Cultural Diversity,
– ob upoštevanju predhodne študije izvršnega odbora UNESCA z dne 12. marca 2003 o tehničnih in pravnih vidikih glede možnosti normativnega instrumenta o kulturni raznolikosti,
– having regard to the UNESCO Executive Board's Preliminary Study of 12 March 2003 on the Technical and Legal Aspects Relating to the Desirability of a Standard-setting Instrument on Cultural Diversity,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja v obliki pisma, ki ga je predsednik Evropskega parlamenta posredoval predsednikom Komisije in Sveta dne 26. novembra 2003
– having regard to the opinion in the form of a letter sent by the President of Parliament to the Presidents of the Commission and the Council on 26 November 2003
Referenca Adonis: 313638. ,
Adonis reference: 313638. ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 5. junija 2003 (9686/03),
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 5 June 2003 (9686/03),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije ( KOM(2003)0271 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission (COM(2003) 0271),
– ob upoštevanju splošne deklaracije UNESCA o kulturni raznolikosti z dne 2. novembra 2001,
– having regard to the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity of 2 November 2001,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko in mnenja Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0172/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0172/2005 ),
A. ker tuniški vrh predstavlja drugo bistveno fazo za spodbujanje informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije kot dejavnika trajnostnega razvoja in skupne rasti, saj revščina ljudi ne prikrajša le za dobrine socialne vključenosti,
A. whereas the Tunis Summit constitutes an essential second phase for the promotion of ICTs as a factor for sustainable development and shared growth , since poverty means being deprived not only of goods but also of social inclusion,
B. ker informacijska in komunikacijska tehnologija predstavlja strateški instrument za politike držav ter privilegirano sredstvo za sodelovanje in raziskovanje vzajemnih koristi zahvaljujoč se akcijskemu načrtu med razvitimi državami, državami v vzponu in manj razvitimi državami,
B. whereas ICTs constitute a strategic tool for State policies and a prime vector for mutually beneficial cooperation and research, through the Plan of Action, between developed, emerging and less-developed countries,
C. ker lahko informacijska in komunikacijska tehnologija doprinese k svetovnemu ravnovesju, kakor tudi k individualnemu napredku, s tem ko uresničuje razvojne cilje tisočletja,
C. whereas ICTs can contribute to global balance as well as to individual progress by helping to achieve the Millennium Objectives,
D. ker Unescova odločitev, da sprejme konvencijo o kulturni raznolikosti predstavlja ključno pobudo za boljšo vključenost v informacijsko družbo na podlagi zaščite raznolikosti kulturnega izražanja, mednarodnih kulturnih izmenjav in spodbujanja pluralizma,
D. whereas the decision by UNESCO to adopt a Convention on cultural diversity represents a crucial initiative for developing a more inclusive information society, based on the protection of the diversity of cultural expression, on international cultural exchanges and the promotion of pluralism,