natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker člen 274 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnost nalaga Komisiji odgovornost za izvajanja proračuna, ob upoštevanju načel dobrega finančnega poslovanja, in naproša države članice, da sodelujejo s Komisijo, da bi tako zagotovili uporabo sredstev v skladu s temi načeli;
Whereas Article 274 of the Treaty establishing the European Community makes the Commission responsible for the implementation of the budget having regard to the principles of sound financial management, and requires the Member States to cooperate with the Commission to ensure that the appropriations are used in accordance with these principles;
ker je odgovornost Komisije za izvajanje proračuna odvisno od različnih metod, ki jih ureja člen 53 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za skupni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
Whereas the Commission’s responsibility to implement the budget is subject to different methods, governed by Article 53 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
1 UL L 248, 16.09.2002.
OJ L 248, 16.9.2002. ;
ker obstaja potreba po učinkoviti in uspešni notranji kontroli proračuna Evropske unije;
Whereas there is a need for efficient and effective internal control over the European Union budget;
ker je bil storjen občuten napredek pri izboljšanju sistemov notranje kontrole, vendar se lahko še bolj izboljša njihovo obliko z opredelitvijo jasnih in doslednih ciljev, s čimer bi zagotovili uspešno usklajevanje, zagotavljanje podatkov glede stroškov in koristi ter dosledno uporabo pravil;
Whereas there has been significant progress in improving internal control systems, but there still remains scope for further improving their design by establishing clear and consistent objectives, ensuring effective coordination, providing information on costs and benefits and ensuring a consistent application of requirements;
ker bi morali sistemi notranje kontrole, ki krije dohodke in odhodke Evropske unije, predvideti zanesljivo jamstvo, da so dohodki pridobljeni in odhodki prejeti v skladu z veljavnimi zakonskimi določbami ter upravljani po načelu stroškovne učinkovitosti;
Whereas internal control systems covering European Union revenue and expenditure should provide reasonable assurance that revenue and expenditure is raised and spent in accordance with the legal provisions and managed so as to achieve value for money;
ker je Evropsko računsko sodišče zunanji revizor Evropske unije in zaradi tega ni sestavni del notranjega nadzora;
Whereas the European Court of Auditors is the external auditor of the European Union and therefore not an element of internal control;
ker mednarodni revizijski standardi, ki sta jih določila predvsem Mednarodno združenje računovodji (IFAC) in Mednarodna organizacija vrhovnih revizijskih institucij (INTOSAI), določajo okvir za odnose med zunanjo revizijo in notranjo kontrolo, kakor tudi za uporabo opravljenega dela drugih revizorjev;
Whereas international auditing standards, issued namely by the International Federation of Accountants and INTOSAI, provide a framework for the relation between external audit and internal control, as well as using the work of other auditors;
glede na pripombe in zaključke pripravljalnih del, ki podpirajo mnenje, predstavljeno v priloženem dokumentu 'Informacije, ki podpirajo Mnenje št. 2/2004 o modelu "enotne revizije" (in predlogu za okvir notranje kontrole Skupnosti)',
In view of the observations and conclusions on the preparatory work supporting the Opinion set out in the attached document ‘Information supporting the Opinion No 2/2004 on the “single audit” model (and a proposal for a Community internal control framework)’,
Za zagotavljanje učinkovite in uspešne notranje kontrole sredstev Evropske unije, bi moral biti okvir notranje kontrole Skupnosti razvit skupaj s skupnimi načeli in standardi, ki bi se lahko uporabljali kot temelj za razvijanje novega ali že obstoječih sistemov kontrole na vseh ravneh uprave.
I. In order to ensure effective and efficient internal control of EU funds, a Community internal control framework should be developed containing common principles and standards, to be used as a basis for developing new or existing control systems at all levels of administration.
Kontrole bi se morale navezovati na skupne standarde in biti usklajene, da bi se izognili nepotrebnim podvajanjem.
Controls should be applied to a common standard and coordinated to avoid unnecessary duplication.
Celotni stroški kontrol morajo biti sorazmerni z vsemi koristmi, ki jih prinašajo tako v denarnem kot tudi političnem smislu.
The overall cost of controls should be in proportion to the overall benefits they bring in both monetary and political terms.
Kontrole bi morale biti uporabljene, dokumentirane in vključene v poročila na odprt in pregleden način tako, da bi rezultate uporabljali vsi udeleženci sistema in bi se nanje lahko zanesli.
Controls should be applied, documented and reported in an open and transparent way, allowing the results to be used and relied upon by all parts of the system.
"Lastnik" kontrol mora biti Evropska unija, ne pa posamezna kontrolna organizacija.
The ‘owner’ of the checks should be the European Union, not the individual control organisations.
Da bi bile kontrole učinkovite in uspešne, bi morala biti zakonodaja, na kateri temelji politika in uporabljeni postopki, jasna in nedvoumna ter brez nepotrebne zapletenosti.
To allow controls to be effective and efficient, legislation underlying policy and processes should be clear and unambiguous, and avoid unnecessary complexity.
Izjavam o izdatkih ali stroških preko določenega praga bi morali priložiti potrdilo in poročilo o neodvisni reviziji, ki bi temeljila na skupnih pravilih glede pristopa in vsebine.
Claims of expenditure or costs over a certain threshold should be accompanied by an independent audit certificate and report, based on common standards of approach and content.
Komisija bi morala opredeliti najmanjše število zahtev za sistem notranje kontrole, ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti različnih proračunskih področji.
The Commission should define the minimum requirements for internal control systems whilst taking into account the specific characteristics of the different budgetary areas.
Sisteme, uporabljene na različnih področjih mora spremljati usklajeno obveščanje, da bi se tako uporabniki zavedali ciljev in posledic morebitne kontrole.
Systems in each area should be accompanied by a coordinated information approach to ensure beneficiaries are clearly aware of the objectives and consequences of being checked.
Sistemi notranje kontrole bi morali vključevati mehanizme, ki bi zagotovili, da se šibkosti v sistemih samih, kakor tudi napake in nepravilnosti pri transakcijah identificirajo in popravijo ter, da se po potrebi izvršijo izterjatve.
The internal control systems should include mechanisms to ensure that weaknesses in the systems themselves, as well as errors and irregularities in transactions, are identified and corrected, and where necessary, recoveries made.
Sistemi notranje kontrole zahtevajo primerno ravnovesje med stroški kontrol določenega proračunskega področja ter koristmi, ki jih kontrole prinesejo v obliki omejevanja tveganj izgub in nepravilnosti na sprejemljivi stopnji.
Internal control systems require an appropriate balance between the cost of controlling a particular budgetary area and the benefits the checks bring in terms of limiting the risk of loss and irregularity to an acceptable level.
Komisija je ob sodelovanju z državami članicami odgovorna za spodbujanje izboljšav v sistemih notranje kontrole.
The Commission should be responsible for promoting the improvement in internal control systems in partnership with Member States.
Jasno opredeljeni standardi in cilji sistemov notranje kontrole bodo omogočili Sodišču, da bo razpolagalo z objektivnimi temelji, s katerimi bo ocenjevalo zasnovo in delovanje v okviru svojih revizij.
X. Clearly defined standards and objectives of internal control systems would provide an objective basis against which the Court could assess their design and operation when auditing them.
Veliko število predlaganih načel in standardov se že popolnoma ali deloma upošteva pri sedanjih sistemih medtem, ko je treba razviti in vpeljati nove.
Many of the proposed principles and standards are either fully, or partially, in place, whilst others will need to be developed and introduced.
Potrebne bodo spremembe v zakonodaji in delovni praksi, kar bo zahtevalo veliko mero zavezanosti tako evropskih institucij kot držav članic.
Changes will be needed in legislation and work practices that will require considerable commitment from both the European institutions and the Member States.
To mnenje je sprejelo Računsko sodišče v Luksemburgu na svojem zasedanju dne 18. marca 2004.
This Opinion was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 18 March 2004.
Za Računsko sodišče
For the Court of Auditors
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003
on the discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003
Pripravljavec mnenja: Armin Laschet
Draftsman: Armin Laschet
Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Pod novo postavko Zunanje politike
Under new heading External Policies
Nova podpostavka Reforma sistema upravljanja zunanje pomoči
New subheading The reform of the external aid management system
96a (novo) ugotavlja, da je Komisija polagala veliko upanja v reformo, ko je bila sprožena leta 2000, in da jo je razglasila za uspešno; je seznanjen in podpira sklepe Sveta z dne 22-23. novembra 2004, v katerih Svet hvali Komisijo za doseženi napredek pri izboljšanju upravljanja in hitrega izplačevanja pomoči Skupnosti ter spodbuja Komisijo k nadaljevanju prizadevanj, usmerjenih v izboljšanje kakovosti in učinkovitosti izvajanja; ugotavlja, ob izkazovanju popolne podpore decentralizaciji, da morajo biti znatni stroški, ki jih povzroča decentralizacija, opravičeni z otipljivimi rezultati; zato pozdravlja prihodnjo oceno Računskega sodišča o delovanju decentralizacije v okviru delegacij, kot je navedeno v delovnem programu 2004 Računskega sodišča in kot je pozival Odbor za zunanje zadeve v svojem mnenju o razrešnici 2002; upa, da bo poročilo vključevalo vsaj analizo stroškov in koristi decentralizacije;
96a (new) Points out that the Commission had high hopes for the reform when it was launched in 2000 and has declared it to be a success; notes and endorses the Council Conclusions of 22-23 November 2004, in which the Council commends the Commission on the progress achieved in improving the management and timely delivery of Community assistance and encourages continued efforts to improve the quality and effectiveness of implementation; while fully supporting deconcentration, notes that the considerable additional costs entailed need to be backed up by tangible results; therefore welcomes the forthcoming Court of Auditors' evaluation of how deconcentration has been working in the Delegations, as indicated in the Court's 2004 Work Programme and as called for by the Committee on Foreign Affairs in its opinion on the 2002 discharge; trusts that the report will, at the very least, include a cost-benefit analysis of deconcentration;
96b (novo) čeprav poročilo o dejavnostih 2003 generalnega direktorata Relex omenja potrebo po nadaljnji oceni decentralizacije, se zdi, da bi bile predmet te ocene le potrebe po osebju; opozarja zlasti na poziv Sveta Komisiji, naj izvede kakovostno oceno zunanje pomoči ES, ločeno od letnega poročila, ter da jo predstavi pred julijem 2005;
96b (new) Notes that, while the 2003 Activity Report by DG Relex speaks of a need for further evaluation of the deconcentration, it would appear that this evaluation would only concern staffing needs; draws attention particularly, therefore, to the Council's invitation to the Commission "to conduct a qualitative assessment of EC External Assistance separate to the Annual Report" and to present this before July 2005;
96c (novo) opozarja na dejstvo, da še vedno ni ustreznih sistemov upravljanja informacij, kot tudi sistema nadzora dela delegacij v zvezi z oceno finančnih tveganj; ta položaj je sam generalni direktorat Relex priznal v svojem Letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2003 in ga pripisuje pomanjkanju človeških virov; čeprav je treba pozdraviti iskrenost Komisije in njene predloge, usmerjene v izboljšanje položaja, ugotavlja, da je potrebno te predloge izvesti čim prej in poziva Komisijo, da pred julijem 2005 predstavi vmesno poročilo o doseženem napredku;
96c (new) Draws attention to the continued absence of proper information management systems and a system of supervision of the work of the Delegations regarding the evaluation of financial risks, a situation recognised by DG Relex itself in its Annual Activity Report of 2003 and attributed to a shortage of human resources; points out that, while the Commission's candour and its proposals to remedy the situation are to be welcomed, these must be implemented sooner rather than later, and calls on the Commission to issue an interim report on its progress before July 2005;
96d (novo) opozarja na dejstvo, da lahko večja doslednost različnih politik Evropske unije poveča učinkovitost porabe Skupnosti;
96d (new) Draws attention to the fact that greater coherence between different EU policies can improve the efficiency of EU expenditure;
Nova podpostavka Letno poročilo Računskega sodišča
New subheading Court of Auditors' Annual Report
96e (novo) v zvezi z letnim poročilom Računskega sodišča na splošno meni, da bi bilo koristno, če bi Računsko sodišče pripravilo jasnejši oris dejanske škode, ki so jo povzročile morebitne ugotovljene nepravilnosti;
96e (new) With regard to the Court of Auditors' Annual Report in general, would find it helpful if the Court provided a clearer picture of the actual damage caused by any irregularities which have been identified;
96f (novo) priznava potrebo po vzpostavitvi ravnotežja med zahtevami na področju postopkov in poročanja za NVO na eni strani ter dejansko možnostjo za slednje, da redno izpolnjujejo te zahteve; pozdravil bi razmišljanje Sodišča o tem, kako najbolje uskladiti te interese;
96f (new) Recognises the need to strike a balance between reporting and procedural requirements for NGOs on the one hand and the feasibility of NGOs meeting these on a regular basis on the other hand, and would welcome reflection by the Court on how these interests could be better reconciled;
96g (novo) sprašuje, če je Komisija skušala primerjati učinkovitost pomoči raznih mednarodnih donatorjev; če tega še ni storila, predlaga, da čim prej opravi to nalogo;
96g (new) Asks whether the Commission has made attempts to compare the efficiency of various international aid donors; if not, proposes that such an exercise be undertaken as soon as possible;
Nova podpostavka Solidarnostni sklad za Latinsko Ameriko
New subheading Solidarity Fund for Latin America
96h (novo) opozarja, da je Parlament ob različnih priložnostih podprl zamisel o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada za Latinsko Ameriko; ugotavlja, čeprav obstaja občutna podpora v korist takšnega sklada, da bi ga morala spremljati večja socialna prizadevanja s strani političnega in gospodarskega vodstva zadevnih držav; zlasti opozarja na odgovornost, ki jo imajo države s posebno negativnimi rezultati na področju delitve dohodka, da poskušajo popraviti takšen položaj; ugotavlja, da bi Evropska unija morala uresničevati socialne cilje v takšnih državah tako z zagotavljanjen pomoči kot s prepričevanjem zadevnih držav, da si same bolj prizadevajo v tej smeri; meni, da je treba najti zadovoljivo ravnotežje med tema dvema elementoma;
96h (new) Draws attention to the support given by Parliament on numerous occasions to the idea of having a Solidarity Fund for Latin America; notes that, while there is considerable support for such a fund, it would have to be accompanied by greater social commitment from the political and economic leadership of the countries in question; in particular, draws attention to the responsibility of countries with a particularly bad record of income distribution to seek to rectify this; notes that the EU should pursue social objectives in these countries by both delivering aid and convincing the countries in question to do more themselves, and that a satisfactory balance between these two elements should be found;
96i (novo) pričakuje, da bo Komisija zagotovila (pisno) razlago Parlamentu, vsakokrat ko ne bo izvedla določbe iz proračunske pripombe;
96i (new) Expects the Commission to provide a (written) explanation to Parliament each time it does not implement a provision set out in a budgetary remark;
Pod podpostavko Predpristopna pomoč
Under the subheading Pre-accession aid
96j(novo) izraža zaskrbljenost, ker Komisija ni zagotovila, da bi bil pred pristopom dokončan postopek akreditacije za številne agencije, ki izvajajo programe PHARE in ISPA v novih državah članicah, vendar poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva zagotoviti, da ne bo ponovila iste napake v primeru Romunije, Bolgarije in bodočih držav pristopnic;
96j(new) Is concerned by the failure to ensure that the accreditation process for many PHARE and ISPA agencies in the new Member States was completed before accession; urges the Commission, however, to endeavour to ensure that such a failure does not occur in relation to Romania, Bulgaria and the future acceding countries;
Razrešnica glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003
Discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003
Datum imenovanja
Draftsman Date appointed
Namestniki (člen 178(2))navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitutes under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote
Odbor za razvoj poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. pozdravlja izboljšave, ki jih je Komisija uvedla v svojem sistemu poročanja in priznava kakovostno izboljšanje letnega poročila za leto 2004 o razvojni politiki in zunanji pomoči ES ( KOM(2004)0536 in SEC(2004)1027 );
Welcomes the improvements made by the Commission in its reporting system and recognises the improved quality of the Annual Report 2004 on EC Development Policy and External Assistance ( COM(2004)0536 and SEC(2004)1027 );
8. pozdravlja vlogo Komisije v razpravi o usklajevanju darovalcev in harmonizaciji postopkov; obžaluje pomanjkanje napredka na mednarodni ravni in odpor držav članic; poziva Komisijo, da poveča prizadevanja za preprečevanje podvajanja razvojnih ukrepov in za napredek v smeri komplementarnosti;
Welcomes the role of the Commission in the debate on donor coordination and harmonisation of procedures; deplores the lack of progress on the international level and the reluctance of Member States; urges the Commission to increase efforts to avoid duplications of development actions and to progress towards complementarity;
Razrešnica glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003
The discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003
Pripravljavec(-ka) mnenja Datum imenovanja
Draftswoman Date appointed
Danutė Budreikaitė, Jana Hybášková, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Sérgio Ribeiro, Feleknas Uca, Margrietus van den Berg and Anna Záborská.
Danutė Budreikaitė, Jana Hybášková, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Sérgio Ribeiro, Feleknas Uca, Margrietus van den Berg and Anna Záborská.
John Bowis, Manolis Mavrommatis, Karin Scheele, Britta Thomsen and Gabriele Zimmer.
John Bowis, Manolis Mavrommatis, Karin Scheele, Britta Thomsen and Gabriele Zimmer.
OMNENJE ODBORA ZA OKOLJE, JAVNO ZDRAVJE IN VARNO HRANO
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY
za Odbor za proračunski nadzorl
for the Committee on Budgetary Control
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov meni, da se Komisiji lahko podeli razrešnica na področjih okolja, javnega zdravja in varne hrane.
On the basis of the data available, is of the opinion that the Commission can be granted discharge in respect of expenditure in the areas of environment, public health and food safety.
Mnenje obravnava izvrševanje proračuna na področju okolja, javnega zdravja in politike varne hrane za proračunsko leto 2003.
This opinion examines the execution of the budget in the areas of environment, public health and food safety policy for the financial year 2003.
Stopnje izvajanja prevzetih obveznosti za proračunske postavke na področju okolja (notranje politike - naslov B4-3) segajo od 72% do 100% (povprečna stopnja izvajanja je 89%).
The implementation rates for commitments for the environment budget lines (internal policies - title B4-3) varied between 72% and 100%, giving an average implementation rate of 89%.
To število vključuje tudi proračunski postavki, ki sploh nista bili izvršeni, namreč B4-301 (Kyoto-Evropa) in B4-303 (zaščita gozdov).
This figure incorporates also the two budget lines, which were not implemented at all, namely B4-301 on Kyoto-Europe and B4-303 on Protection of forests.
V prvem primeru so bili izvedbeni problemi predvideni že pred končnim sprejetjem proračunske postavke.
In the first case, the implementation problems were envisaged already before the final adoption of the budget line.
V drugem primeru je bila pravna podlaga sprejeta šele sredi novembra 2003, tako da v letu 2003 za to postavko niso bile prevzete obveznosti.
In the second case, the legal base was only adopted in mid-November 2003 so that no credits were committed in 2003.
Zato so bila sredstva prenešena v leto 2004.
The credits were thus carried forward to 2004.
Raven prevzetih obveznosti za program LIFE (LIFE Narava, LIFE Okolje in LIFE Tretje države) je bila dobra, v vseh treh primerih višja od 92%.
The level of commitments for the LIFE programme (LIFE Nature, LIFE Environment and LIFE Third countries) was good, all above 92%.
Raven plačil je kot navadno nekoliko zaostajala in nihala med 71 in 99 odstotkov.
The level of payments lagged a bit behind, as usual, varying between 71 and 99 percent.
Prevzem obveznosti v proračunski postavki za trajnostni razvoj naselij (B4-305) je bil zaradi nizke kakovosti predstavljenih projektov nižji od povprečja (72%).
The commitments on the budget line on sustainable urban development (B4-305) were lower than average, 72%, due to the poor quality of projects being presented.
Tudi stopnja izvajanja proračunskih postavk GD za okolje iz naslova "zakonodaja, ukrepi, ki povečujejo osveščenost in drugi splošni ukrepi" (B4-304, B4-304A) je padla krepko pod povprečje (76,5% in 78,9%).
Also the implementation rate of the DG Environment budget lines on 'legislation, awareness raising and other actions" (B4-304, B4-304A) fell clearly below the average (76.5% and 78.9%).
V skladu z GD za okolje je bil glavni razlog za nizke stopnje začetek veljavnosti nove Finančne uredbe, kot tudi splošna zamuda pri prevzemanju obveznosti in posledično pri izvrševanju plačil.
According to DG Environment, the entry into force of the new Financial Regulation was the main reason for the low rates, as there was a general delay for making commitments and correspondingly, for making payments.
JAVNO ZDRAVJE
PUBLIC HEALTH