natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· življenjska doba je vse daljša in na splošno je zdravje ljudi boljše, vendar je v visoki starosti vse več ljudi, ki telesno in duševno trpijo;
· People are living longer and, on the whole healthier, lives, but in their later years a growing number of them become frail of body and mind.
· osebe, ki skrbijo in negujejo otroka, odraslega ali starejšega sorodnika niso bile deležne pomoči, ki bi jim olajšala prilagoditev novemu sistemu nege skupnosti, namenjene ljudem z duševnimi težavami;
· Carers, of a child, an adult or an elderly relative, have not been helped to adapt to the new community care of people with mental health problems.
· veliko družbenih težav, kot so odvisnost od drog, kriminal, alkoholizem, nesreče, odsotnost z dela, vandalizem, hiperaktivnost otrok in brezdomstvo, je pravzaprav povezanih z duševnimi težavami.
· Drug addiction and crime, drunkenness, accidents, absenteeism, vandalism, disruptive pupils, rough sleepers, and many of society’s “problems” in fact link to mental health problems.
Če ne bomo vlagali v prave oblike pomoči, kot so denimo stacionarna, akutna, dolgotrajna, varovana, srednje varovana in dnevna oskrba in oskrba na domu ter v usposobljeno osebje, sedanjih bolnikov ne bo mogoče pozdraviti, rehabilitirati ali zanje skrbeti.
If we do not invest in the right range of services – in-patient, acute, long-stay, secure, medium secure, day-care, domiciliary care and the trained staff for each – we shall not cure, care for or rehabilitate those who are ill now.
Brez naložb v duševno zdravje naših državljanov bo naglo naraslo število bolnikov in z njimi tudi stroški.
If we do not invest in a mentally healthy life for our citizens, then the graph will continue rapidly to climb, in numbers and in cost.
Če ne bomo vlagali v boljše razumevanje duševnega zdravja in duševnih motenj, bodo odobrena proračunska sredstva vse manjša, stigmatizacija in predsodki pa vse pogostejši.
If we do not invest in bringing understanding about mental health and mental disorders, then budgets will remain pitiful and stigma and prejudice will be rampant.
Bolnikom in uporabnikom storitev se upravičeno namenja vse več pozornosti.
Patients and Service Users are steadily and rightly moving centre-stage.
Ti bodo vse bolje obveščeni, vse bolj bodo sodelovali pri odločitvah, ki jih zadevajo, in se posluževali novih pravic, s pomočjo katerih se bodo izognili neučinkovitim storitvam in vplivali na spremembe.
They will be better informed, be more involved in decisions affecting them and will use their new rights to bypass sluggish services and effect change.
Upoštevati jih je treba kot aktivne partnerje pri načrtovanju njihovega zdravljenja in načrtovanju storitev.
They need to be seen as partners in their own treatment plans but also in service planning.
Zdravstveno osebje mora ravnati tako, kot bi ravnali najboljši strokovnjaki s tega področja; pojasniti mora sprejem kakršne koli odločitve in se o njej posvetovati z bolnikom.
Health professionals need to do what the best do in most areas of healthcare - explain and consult before decisions are taken.
Na tak način bodo bolniki ne le upoštevali strokovno mnenje zdravstvenega osebja, temveč bodo najverjetneje svojo bolezen tudi bolje razumeli in mirneje sprejeli predlagane načine zdravljenja.
Then the patient will not just respect their professional judgement but would also, perhaps, understand a little more what was wrong and be a little less apprehensive about what was being done to them.
Tak pristop je pravilen in bolnikom omogoča, da se lažje sprijaznijo z rezultati terapije in programom oskrbe.
That is right in human rights terms; it also makes for better compliance with and outcome from the treatment and care programme.
Za uspešno delovanje takih služb so potrebna ustrezna finančna sredstva in multidisciplinarno timsko delo.
To be successful such services need adequate resources and multi-disciplinary teamwork.
Poleg tega je treba javnost prepričati, da je tak način koristen tako za bolnike kot za družbo.
They also need to convince the public that such methods work for both patients and communities.
Grozljive zgodbe o bolnikih, ki po izhodu iz ustanove škodijo sebi in drugim, lahko uničijo dolgoletna prizadevanja za oblikovanje sistema, ki bi bil bolj človeški, in dokazujejo, kako zelo nujen je ustrezen sistem spremljanja in ocenjevanja.
Lurid media stories of patients being discharged and causing harm to themselves or others can undo years of work towards a more humane system and show how crucial proper checks and balances are.
Na tak način se lahko pojavi tudi negotovost med ljudmi, ki bi lahko ob srečevanju posameznikov, ki se "nenavadno" vedejo, podvomili v ustreznost nadzora nad takimi osebami.
So can public uncertainty as to whether someone who may be behaving “oddly” in the street is being adequately supervised.
Naš sistem duševnega zdravja ima pet ključnih pomanjkljivosti:
There are five key flaws in our mental health system:
· neprimernost storitev, ki jih družba ponuja;
· the inadequacy of community services;
· neupoštevanje uporabnikov storitev in njihovih negovalcev;
· the failure to listen to service users and their carers;
· nezmožnost ali nepripravljenost različnih služb do sodelovanja;
· the inability or unwillingness of different agencies to work together;
· zelo pomanjkljiva finančna sredstva
· serious underfunding;
· in takšno politiko spodbujanja duševnega zdravja, ki se v večini držav kaže predvsem s svojo odsotnostjo.
· and a policy for mental health promotion that is in most countries notrable by its almost complete absence.
To mora biti tesno povezano z znanjem in zavzetostjo zdravnikov, terapevtov in bolniških sester, raziskovalcev, upravljavcev bolnišnic, klinik in lokalnih skupnosti ter podporo svetovalnih nevladnih organizacij.
That must go hand in hand with the skills and dedication of doctors, therapists and nurses, research scientists, managers of hospitals, clinics and community teams and the support of advocacy NGOs.
Bolniki ali rekonvalescenti potrebujejo varen dom; ne potrebujejo izolacije v blokovskih stanovanjih v propadajočih zgradbah, temveč skupnost, v kateri jim bo življenjsko okolje nudilo tisto oporo in trdnost, ki jo potrebujejo.
But, if one is ill or recovering from illness, one needs the security of a home, not in the isolation of high-rise flats on run down estates, but in communities where the living environment will be part of the support and stability one needs.
Potrebujejo dostop do dejavnosti, ki jim bodo pomagale okrevati, podporo svoje družine in sosedov.
One needs access to activities that will aid recovery, support from family and neighbours.
Mnogi od nas bodo potrebovali to nesebično pomoč.
So many of us are going to need this enlightened care.
Znanstveni in družbeni napredek je prinesel nove izzive in tudi stroške na področju duševnega zdravja in socialnega varstva.
Scientific and societal advances have brought new challenges and new costs in mental health and social care.
S spremenjeno predstavo o tem, kje in kdaj se izvajata zdravljenje in oskrba, se običajnim težavam, kot sta pomanjkanje razumevanja in finančnih sredstev, pogosto pridruži še negotovost, katere plod so predsodki in stigmatizacija.
And policy changes on where and when to treat and care have often added uncertainty to the standard problems of lack of understanding and inadequate resources, together leading to prejudice and the breeding grounds of stigma.
Bistveno je vprašanje, kako usmeriti več politične pozornosti in potem tudi finančnih sredstev na področje duševnega zdravja.
The crucial question is how to divert more political attention and then financial resources to mental health.
Politični svet in javnost se duševnega zdravja zavedata v kriznih situacijah.
Mental Health really only penetrates the political and public mind, when there is a crisis.
V Združenem kraljestvu nismo na področju duševnega zdravja še nikoli dosegli tako velikega napredka z vidika financ, pobud in reform kot takrat, ko je nek moški v londonskem živalskem vrtu skočil v levjo kletko, neka druga oseba pa je zabodla tujca na podzemni železnici; tedaj so namreč vladni uslužbenci začutili potrebo po tem, da ukrepajo, tisk, parlament, javnost in nevladne organizacije pa so to zahtevale.
In the UK we achieved more progress on mental health, in terms of cash, initiatives and reforms, when one man jumped into the lion’s den at London Zoo and another stabbed a stranger on the Underground, than at any other time, because Colleagues across Government saw the need to do something and Press, Parliament, Public and NGOs clamoured for it.
Ampak to je imelo svojo ceno - vse manjše zaupanje javnosti in vse večjo stigmatizacijo.
But it was at a price – the price of lowered public confidence and increased stigma.
A niti takšne negativne zgodbe ne koristijo spodbujanju duševnega zdravja.
Mental Health promotion does not even benefit in that way from negative stories.
Vlade, politiki in celo odgovorni za načrtovanje zdravstvene oskrbe zanj nimajo veliko razumevanja.
There is little understanding by governments, politicians or even health service planners of mental health promotion.
Glavni razlog je ta, da nimajo predstave o tem, kaj je psihično zdravje in zakaj bi jih to moralo zanimati.
The main reason is they have no idea what it is about or why they should be interested.
Duševno zdravje ima štiri šibke točke.
Mental Health suffers from a quadruple whammy.
Manjka stalni pritisk javnosti, strokovnjakov in sredstev javnega obveščanja na vlade in upravljavce zdravstvenih služb, naj več ukrepajo, vlagajo več denarja, več dosegajo.
There is no constant public, professional and media pressure on government and health service managers to do more, spend more, achieve more.
Drugače kot pri boleznih srca, aidsu ali raku je o zdravljenju, ozdravitvi in rehabilitaciji duševnih bolnikov le malo znanega.
Unlike heart disease or AIDS or cancer, there is little understanding of what can be done to treat, cure and rehabilitate.
Še manj je znanega o tem, kako je mogoče duševne bolezni preprečevati in kako spodbujati duševno zdravje.
There is even less understanding of what can be done to prevent mental illness and promote mental health.
Maloštevilne so meritve rezultatov, ki bi jih izvedenci na področju zdravja, še manj pa javnost in politiki, razumeli.
And there are few outcome measurements that Health Departments and Managers, much less public and politicians, can understand.
Vladam, delodajalcem, sindikatom, šolam, visokim šolam, lokalnim svetom in skupnostim, družinam in posameznikom, vsem je treba pokazati, kakšna je lahko njihova vloga pri zagotavljanju duševne blaginje in kako lahko preprečujejo, zmanjšujejo ali blažijo duševne težave.
Governments, employers, trade unions, schools, colleges, local councils and communities, families and individuals all need to be helped to understand the role they can play in ensuring mental wellbeing and so prevent, reduce or mitigate mental health problems.
Izziv za nas, politike, je razumeti, kaj pomeni imeti psihične težave.
Our challenge as policymakers is to understand what it means to have a mental health problem.
Obstaja velika verjetnost, da bodo osebe s takšnimi težavami - v družbi in družini, na delovnem mestu in pri igri ter celo v naših zdravstvenih in socialnih službah - ožigosali, obravnavali zviška, poniževali ali se jih bali in jih v večji ali manjši meri potiskali ob rob.
It almost certainly means that one is labelled, patronised, despised, feared and, to a greater or lesser extent, segregated – in society, within our family, at work, at play and even within our health and social services.
Zavedati se moramo svoje politične odgovornosti.
Then we have to accept our policymaking responsibilities.
Storitev brez profesionalne, javne in politične podpore bo dvakrat zgrešila bolnike in njihove družine.
A service, which does not gain professional, public and political support, fails patients and their families doubly.
Ne bo zagotavljala primernega zdravljenja in oskrbe, hkrati pa bo izgubila zaupanje javnosti in krepila stigmatizacijo.
It fails to treat and care adequately and it prompts a downward spiral of public confidence and so reinforces stigma.
Naša naloga je izobraževati in obveščati, da bomo prekinili začarani krog predsodkov, ki vladajo v javnem mnenju, medijskih poročilih in prednostnih nalogah vlad.
We need to educate and inform, so that we can break the vicious vein of prejudice that runs through public attitudes, media coverage and government priorities.
Prisluhniti moramo uporabnikom storitev in se učiti od njih; vključevati jih moramo kot partnerje, ne le obravnavati kot bolnike.
We need to listen and learn from service users and see and involve them as partners and not just patients.
Ozreti se moramo vase in po svoji družbi ter si priznati, da smo dopustili, da je institucionalizirana stigma okužila naše politične, socialne in zdravstvene sisteme.
We need to look within ourselves and within our society and acknowledge that we allow an institutionalised stigmatisation to infect our political, social and health systems.
Imamo dva cilja: prepričati javnost v to, da bo verjela, in Komisijo ter države članice v to, da morajo ukrepati.
Our twin aims must be to convince the public to believe and to convince Commission and Member States to act.
Če bo javnost verjela, bo pritisnila na Evropsko unijo, naj ukrepa.
If the public believe, they will put pressure on the European Union to act.
Če bo Evropska unija ukrepala, bo omogočila zaupanje javnosti.
If the European Union acts, they will make public belief possible.
Ljudem z duševnimi težavami moramo pogledati v oči.
We need to look into the eyes of people with mental health problems.
Ko bomo to storili, bomo v njih prepoznali zmedena čustva in misli.
When we do, we see reflected back the confusion of emotions and thoughts.
Obenem pa bomo videli upanje - upanje, da jim bomo prisluhnili, jih razumeli, poskrbeli zanje, ukrepali in da jim bomo lahko pomagali.
But we also see the hope – the hope that we will listen; that we will understand; that we will care; that we will act; that we can help.
Odboru za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
o izboljšanju duševnega zdravja prebivalstva: pot k strategiji na področju duševnega zdravja za Evropsko unijo
on improving the mental health of the population: towards a strategy on mental health for the European Union
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. priporoča, da vse strategije na področju duševnega zdravja upoštevajo socialno-ekonomske in kulturne razlike med obravnavanimi prebivalci;
Recommends that every strategy in the field of mental health should take into account the socio-economic and cultural differences of the population under study;
7. poudarja, da lahko deinstitucionalizacija psihiatričnih služb in vzpostavitev služb v okviru sistema osnovnega zdravstvenega varstva spodbujata vključenost v družbo;
Points out that the de-institutionalisation of mental health services and the establishment of services within the primary healthcare system may support social integration;
10. meni, da dobri delovni pogoji prispevajo k duševnemu zdravju in da morajo zato podjetja vzpostaviti politiko pomoči duševno bolnim delavcem ter tistim, pri katerih bi se te bolezni lahko pojavile;
Considers that good working conditions contribute to mental health and that therefore companies should have policies in place to support workers who may develop or already suffer from mental ill health;
15. pozdravlja dejstvo, da zelena knjiga v poglavju 6.1 priznava pomen spodbujanja duševnega zdravja in preprečevanja duševnih bolezni za izboljšanje duševnega zdravja prebivalcev EU; verjame, da si je treba prizadevati za trajnostno medsektorsko povezovanje, ki vključuje večsektorske in večdisciplinarne pristope;
Welcomes the fact that the Green Paper, in section 6.1, recognises the importance of the promotion of mental health and the prevention of mental ill health for improving the mental health of the EU population; believes that every effort should be made towards sustainable inter-sectoral linkages incorporating multi-sectoral and multidisciplinary approaches;
19. razen tega opozarja, da je treba določiti pogoje glede uporabe razpoložljivih instrumentov Skupnosti, kot je sedmi okvirni program za raziskave, za razvoj raziskovalnih možnosti in podporo raziskavam v zvezi z duševnim zdravjem v EU;
Notes, moreover, that conditions should be laid down concerning the use of the available Community instruments, such as the 7th research framework programme, for the development of research opportunities and support for research into mental health in the EU;
22. meni tudi, da lahko povečanje ozaveščenosti javnosti, socialnih partnerjev in drugih odgovornih organov o slabšem duševnem zdravju, njegovemu preprečevanju in možnostih zdravljenja ter o spodbujanju vključevanja duševno bolnih in prizadetih oseb v delovno življenje pripomoreta k večjemu sprejemanju in razumevanju s strani družbe;
Considers also that increasing the awareness of the public, the social partners and other responsible bodies in regard to mental ill health, its prevention, and treatment options, and encouraging the integration of the mentally ill and individuals with disabilities into working life, may result in greater acceptance and understanding by society;
24. verjame, da je treba več sredstev nameniti spodbujanju duševnega zdravja z uporabo preventivnih raziskovalnih ukrepov, zlasti z vidika starajočega se prebivalstva EU in s tem pogostejšega pojavljanja nevrodegenerativnih motenj, kot sta Alzheimerjeva in Parkinsonova bolezen;
Believes that it is necessary to devote more resources to promoting mental health by means of preventive research actions, notably from the viewpoint of the EU's ageing population and thus the more frequent occurrence of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease;
28. poudarja velike razlike med posameznimi državami članicami glede izdatkov za duševno zdravje, izraženih v absolutnem smislu in kot delež skupnih izdatkov za zdravstveno varstvo;
Highlights the sizeable differences in mental health expenditure in individual Member States, both in terms of the absolute amount and as a proportion of health care expenditure as a whole;
31. verjame, da so potrebne temeljite raziskave, da bi pojasnili obstoječe razlike v organizaciji in zagotavljanju zdravstvene in socialne oskrbe duševno motenih ljudi ter različne rezultate te oskrbe; verjame, da so za takšne raziskave potrebne enotne opredelitve in metodologija ter da morajo biti osnovne značilnosti oskrbe duševno bolnih oseb kakovost, diferenciacija, kompleksnost in trajnost; verjame, da zdravstvene in socialne institucije, ki ne izpolnjujejo navedenih pogojev ustreznosti, ne morejo sodelovati pri zagotavljanju zdravstvenega varstva;
Believes that there is a need for thorough research into explaining existing differences in the organisation and provision of medical and social care for people suffering mental disorders as well as into the different results of this care; believes that, in order to conduct such research, it is necessary to have unified definitions and methodology and that the basic characteristics of care for the mentally ill must be quality, differentiation, complexity, and continuity; believes that medical and social institutions not fulfilling the above qualification should not participate in the provision of the healthcare;
Izboljšanje duševnega zdravja prebivalstva.
Improving the mental health of the population.
MNENJE Odbora ZA PRAVICE ŽENSK IN ENAKOST SPOLOV
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality
o izboljšanju duševnega zdravja prebivalstva: pot k strategiji na področju duševnega zdravja za Evropsko unijo
on improving the mental health of the population – towards a strategy on mental health for the European Union
Odbor za pravice žensk in enakost spolov poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker duševno zdravje omogoča državljanom, da polno zaživijo na intelektualnem in čustvenem področju ter se vključujejo v družbeno, šolsko in poklicno življenje, in ker so, nasprotno, duševne bolezni vir stroškov, družbene izključenosti in stigmatizacije;
A. whereas good mental health enables citizens to be intellectually and emotionally fulfilled and integrated into social, educational and professional life; whereas, conversely, poor mental health gives rise to expense, social exclusion and stigmatisation,
B. ker gre za očiten zdravstveni problem, zlasti kar zadeva prehrambene motnje, nevrodegenerativne bolezni, shizofrenijo, spremembe razpoloženja, tesnobo, paniko, depresijo, zlorabo alkohola in drugih sredstev, ki delujejo na psiho, samomore in prestopništvo - področja, kjer so nujno potrebne načrtne raziskave;
B. whereas there is a clear gender dimension to the issue of health, particularly as regards eating disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, schizophrenia, mood disorders, anxiety, panic, depression, abuse of alcohol and other psychoactive substances, as well as suicide and delinquency, areas which also require systematic research,
C. ker ženske pogosteje kot moški iščejo pomoč pri specializiranih službah in prejemajo dvakrat več receptov za psihotropna zdravila kot moški, in ker so farmako-kinetične raziskave pokazale, da ženske ta sredstva težje prenašajo;
C. whereas women tend to seek assistance from services more than men and are prescribed twice as many psychotropic drugs as men; whereas pharmacokinetic studies have shown that women have less tolerance to such products,
D. ker enako kot žrtve vojne tudi žrtve nasilja trpijo za posttravmatskim stresom in je za njihovo ozdravitev nujno potrebno dolgoročno varovanje; ker stres, vezan na strah pred novim nasiljem, negativno vpliva na duševno zdravje in imunski sistem;
D. whereas victims of violence also suffer in similar fashion to victims of war from post-traumatic stress; whereas long-term protection of victims is a condition for rehabilitation; whereas stress resulting from fear of further violent attacks adversely affects both the mind and the body's immune defences,
1. čestita Komisiji za zeleno knjigo, vendar meni, da razsežnost problema ni bila ustrezno upoštevana; zato zahteva, da se problematika sistematično vključi v predlagane ukrepe za spodbujanje duševnega zdravja, v preventivne dejavnosti in raziskave, ker so bile do sedaj opravljene študije nezadostne in neprimerne, kar je povzročilo, da je napredek pri zdravljenju in preprečevanju duševnih bolezni znatno manjši kot pri zdravljenju drugih bolezni;
Congratulates the Commission on its Green Paper but considers that the gender dimension has not duly been taken into account; calls, therefore, for this dimension to be systematically considered in the measures proposed to promote mental health, in preventive measures and in research, in which studies have to date been insufficient and inadequate, to such an extent that progress on the prevention and cure of mental illness has been significantly less great than in the case of other diseases;
5. poziva, da se odobri pomoč materam pred in po rojstvu otrok, tako da se prepreči depresije ali druge psiho-patološke oblike, ki se pogostokrat pojavijo v takih okoliščinah;
Calls for support for mothers during the prenatal and postnatal periods in order to prevent depression or other psychopathological conditions which manifest themselves in significant numbers of cases in these situations;