natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pograjati je treba tudi metodologijo sporočila, kajti če naj bi sprožilo splošno razpravo, v katero bi bile vključene vse vpletene strani (ribiči, podjetja v sektorju ribištva, uprave, potrošniki in druge zainteresirane strani, kot so nevladne organizacije ali že obstoječi certifikacijski organi), je obžalovanja vredno, da je najbolj zanimivi del sporočila, ki vsebuje opredelitve shem okoljskega označevanja ter cilje in merila, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri določitvi preverljivih sistemov, odrinjen v prilogi, ki sta zapisani v enem samem jeziku Skupnosti.
The Commission's methodology also draws criticism, given that if what it claims to be doing is launching a general debate to include all of the parties concerned (fishermen, fishing companies, administrative bodies, consumers, and other relevant parties, such as NGOs or existing certifying bodies), it is extremely regrettable that the most interesting part of the communication, including definitions of eco-labelling schemes, objectives and criteria to be considered when establishing verification systems for eco-labelling, is relegated to the two Annexes and written in just one Community language.
Zato mnoge vpletene strani nimajo dostopa do tega temeljnega sestavnega dela vsakega sistema okoljskega označevanja.
Many of the parties concerned have, therefore, been denied access to what is a fundamental component of any eco-labelling scheme.
Tako kot morda preveč generični cilji, našteti v točki 4 sporočila, pa nedvomno preseneča vsebina poglavja, saj se zdi, da Komisija z njim že vnaprej zavrača možnost uvedbe enotne in javne okoljske oznake.
Coinciding with the objectives (perhaps too generic in nature) listed in section 4 of the communication, the wording of the chapter is none the less surprising, implying that the Commission is rejecting in advance the establishment of a single, public eco-labelling scheme.
Uvedba enotnega okoljskega označevanja Skupnosti bi bila seveda povezana z bolj zapletenimi postopki za pristojne organe in nedvomno tudi z višjimi stroški, vendar ne bi smeli podcenjevati prednosti enotne oznake.
It is clear that the establishment of a single 'Community eco-labelling scheme' would bring with it more complicated processes for the relevant authorities and also undoubtedly greater costs.
Komisija ocenjuje, da obstajajo pri uvedbi sistema okoljskega označevanja Skupnosti tri možnosti: i) "Neukrepanje", ii) "Ustanovitev enotnega sistema Skupnosti o okoljskem označevanju za ribe in ribiške proizvode" in iii) "Določitev minimalnih zahtev za prostovoljne sisteme okoljskega označevanja".
The Commission assesses three options in respect of the implementation of a Community labelling scheme: (i) 'Non-action', (ii) 'Creating a single Community eco-labelling scheme for fish and fishery products', (iii) 'Establishing minimum requirements for voluntary eco-labelling schemes'.
Poročevalka seveda pozdravlja dejstvo, da Komisija zavrača prvo možnost iz navedenih razlogov, in sicer da brez zagotovila neodvisnega certificiranja in akreditiranja ne bi bilo zanesljivosti in da bi lahko tveganje za razdrobitev trga Skupnosti in širjenje oznak povzročala ovire pri prostem pretoku blaga.
Naturally, the rapporteur applauds the rejection of the first option for the same reasons as before - there can be no reliability without a guarantee of independent certification and accreditation, it places the Community market at risk of fragmentation and it encourages the proliferation of labels, hindering the free movement of goods.
Razlika, ki jo Komisija dela med drugo in tretjo možnostjo, pa ni preveč jasna, saj organ, ki določa minimalne zahteve, ki jih je treba izpolnjevati za pridobitev okoljske oznake, po vseh ustreznih mednarodnih merilih, zlasti tistih, ki jih je določila Organizacija ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo, dejansko postane lastnik sistema.
On the other hand, the differentiation that the Commission makes between the second and third options is not at all clear, since according to all other international criteria, particularly those set out by the FAO, the organisation which fixes the minimum requirements for accession to an eco-labelling scheme must in fact take ownership of that system.
Ker je odgovornost za določitev teh zahtev po tretji možnosti pridržana Komisiji, postaja okoljska oznaka javni sistem, tako kot pri drugi možnosti, čeprav to ne bi moglo zagotoviti obstoja ene same okoljske oznake.
Given that in the third option it is the Commission that is responsible for fixing those requirements, this automatically converts the eco-labelling scheme into a public system, as laid out in the second option, although it would not guarantee the existence of a single eco-labelling scheme.
Po drugi strani je mogoče prenesti upravljanje sistema tako na javne kot tudi na zasebne organe, ne glede na to, ali je lastništvo sistema javno ali zasebno.
Moreover, it is the system's management that may fall to either public or private bodies, whether the ownership of the system is public or private.
Zato bi lahko hkrati obstajalo več okoljskih oznak, kar si očitno Komisija želi, ki pa bi bile vse podrejene istemu pravnemu okviru.
We could therefore find ourselves in a situation where several eco-labelling schemes exist side by side, as appears to be the wish of the Commission, yet all of them would be subject to the same regulatory framework.
Pomembna je torej določitev omenjenih minimalnih zahtev, spremljanje sistema in preglednost ter zagotavljanje stalnega nadzora nad proizvodom.
The important thing, therefore, is to fix the aforementioned minimum requirements, the supervision of the system and its transparency, as well as to guarantee the chain of custody.
Glede na večjo ali manjšo restriktivnost teh zahtev bo bolj ali manj pregleden, neodvisen, varen in nediskriminacijski tudi uvedeni pravni okvir.
Depending on whether these requirements are more or less stringent, they will then give rise to a regulatory system that is also more or less transparent, independent, secure and free from discrimination.
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano
OPINIONOF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY
o sprožitvi razprave o pristopu Skupnosti k sistemu okoljskega označevanja za ribiške proizvode
on launching a debate on a Community approach towards eco-labelling schemes for fisheries products
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano poziva Odbor za ribištvo, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. meni, da bo sistem dopolnjeval zakonodajni okvir, s katerim se želi ohraniti ribolovne vire, kar naj bi še naprej ostal poglavitni cilj skupne ribiške politike;
Considers that this system will complement the legislative framework for the preservation of fisheries resources, which should remain the common fisheries policy's fundamental objective;
UL L 17, 21.1.2000, str.
OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p.
22. , ne izvajajo dobro;
22. are badly implemented and enforced in the Member States;
8. poziva zato k enotnemu postopku za razvoj in certificiranje, ki bo dolgoročno spodbujal trajnostne metode proizvodnje in izkoriščanja ribolovnih virov pod pogojem, da bodo označevanje spremljale natančne zahteve v zvezi z:
Calls, therefore, for a uniform development and certification procedure to be set up that, in the long run, allows sustainable methods of producing and exploiting fisheries resources to be promoted, provided that the labels entail strict requirements regarding:
– - zmanjšanjem prilova na najmanjšo mero,
- minimising by-catches,
– - uravnavanjem ulova na osnovi načela „najboljšega možnega trajnostnega izkoristka“ in
- catches regulated on the basis of the 'maximum sustainable yield' principle,
– - učinkovitim izvrševanjem in nadzorom za boj proti nezakonitim praksam;
- effective enforcement and supervision in order to combat illegal practices;
10. zagovarja nadaljnji obstoj nacionalnih in drugih oznak za ribiške proizvode, na katerih so med drugim prikazane posebne lastnosti ribolovnih metod, kot je neškodljivost za delfine ali kvaliteta izdelka;
Advocates the continued existence of national and other labels for fishery products indicating, inter alia, particular features of catch methods, such as harmlessness to dolphins or the quality of the product;
13 priporoča, da poteka sodelovanje v sistemu na prostovoljni podlagi in svetuje, da se predvidi spodbude za lažje sodelovanje zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij ter ribičev malega priobalnega ribolova pri vzpostavitvi sistema;
Recommends that participation in the system should be on a voluntary basis and suggests that there should be incentives to encourage companies, particularly SMEs, and non-industrial fishermen to participate in the system put in place;
Decembra 1997 je Komisija prvič omenila potrebo po razpravi o nediskriminacijskih in prostovoljnih sistemih okoljskega označevanja.
In December 1997, the Commission first addressed the need to discuss non-discriminatory, voluntary eco-labelling schemes.
V letu 2002 je bil sprejet akcijski načrt Skupnosti za vključitev zahtev glede varstva okolja v skupno ribiško politiko in Komisija je izrazila namen, da bo sprožila razpravo o okoljskem označevanju ribiških proizvodov.
In 2002, it adopted a Community Action Plan to integrate environmental protection requirements into the Common Fisheries Policy and announced its intention to launch a debate on the eco-labelling of fisheries products.
29. junija 2005 je Komisija predložila sporočilo glede sprožitve razprave o pristopu Skupnosti k sistemu okoljskega označevanja za ribiške proizvode.
On 29 June 2005, the European Commission presented its Communication launching a debate on a Community approach towards eco-labelling schemes for fisheries products.
Razprava o uvedbi sistema okoljskega označevanja, ki bo omogočal boljše vključevanje varstva okolja v ribiški sektor, je ob nedavni reformi skupne ribiške politike postala nujna.
The recent reform of the Common Fisheries Policy makes it necessary to discuss the issue of the introduction of eco-labelling schemes as a means of better integrating environmental protection concerns into the fisheries sector.
Poleg tega je pojav raznih proizvodov v tem sektorju v zadnjem času, opremljenih s tako imenovano okoljsko oznako, sprožil številna vprašanja, povezana s konkurenco, zunanjo trgovino in varstvom potrošnikov.
In addition, the recent emergence of various "eco-labelled" products in this sector raises questions with respect to competition, external trade, and consumer protection.
Med cilji, ki si jih je zastavila Komisija, so tudi spodbujanje trajnostnega ribolova, ustrezna raven zaščite morskih ekosistemov, usklajen pristop k sistemom okoljskega označevanja ter pregledno in objektivno informiranje potrošnikov.
Among its objectives, the Commission aims to promote sustainable fisheries and an adequate level of protection of the marine eco-system, a harmonised approach to eco-labelling schemes and transparent and objective information for consumers.
Komisija predvideva tri možnosti:
The Commission considers three options:
Neukrepanje in možnost, da se sistemi okoljskega označevanja prosto razvijajo na trgu, ne da bi javni sektor vanje posegal ali jih nadzoroval.
Non-action and freedom to develop eco-labelling schemes on the market, without any intervention and control from the public sector.
Ustanovitev enotnega sistema Skupnosti o okoljskem označevanju za ribe in ribiške proizvode.
Create a single Community eco-labelling scheme for fish and fisheries products.
Določitev minimalnih zahtev za prostovoljne sisteme okoljskega označevanja.
Establishing minimum requirements for voluntary eco-labelling schemes.
Komisija se je v sporočilu jasno opredelila za tretjo možnost.
In its Communication, the Commission clearly favours Option 3.
Vendar želi poročevalka izraziti pomislek glede te možnosti, ki se je v okviru uresničevanja ambicioznih ciljev Komisije izkazala kot nezadostna.
However, the draftswoman wants to express her concerns about this option which would not be sufficient if it aims to achieve the ambitious objectives defined by the Commission.
Poleg tega lahko množični pojav oznak omeji vlogo sistema okoljskega označevanja.
Moreover, a proliferation of labels risks weakening the role an eco-label can play.
Prav zaradi teh razlogov se poročevalka strinja z uvedbo enotnega sistema okoljskega označevanja Skupnosti, ki bo izpolnjeval stroga merila.
These are some of the reasons why the draftswoman is in favour of the creation of a single Community eco-labelling scheme with ambitious criteria.
V skladu s cilji, ki jih zastavlja sporočilo, in ob zavzetosti različnih akterjev bi Komisiji morala uspeti izdelava sistema okoljskega označevanja, ki bo pregleden, dosegljiv in zanesljiv.
In the light of the objectives defined in the Communication and with the involvement of the stakeholders, the Commission should establish a transparent, accessible and credible eco-labelling system.
Komisija mora zagotoviti, da označevanje ne bo predstavljalo trgovinskih ovir.
The Commission must ensure that this label does not act as a barrier to trade.
Zato je pomembno, da je to označevanje popolnoma v skladu s smernicami s področja okoljskega označevanja, ki jih je določila Organizacija ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo in ki temeljijo na njenem kodeksu odgovornega ribištva
Therefore, such a label has to be fully coherent with the international guidelines for eco-labelling schemes, as agreed by the FAO and based on its Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries
Poročilo o ribištvu št. 595. .
No 595. .
Da ne bi ustanavljali novih struktur, poročevalka prav tako predlaga, da se v upravljanje tega označevanja vključi agencijo Skupnosti za nadzor ribolova.
In order to prevent the creation of a new structure, the draftswoman also suggests involving the European Fisheries Control Agency in the management of this label.
V okviru tega označevanja je posebno skrb treba nameniti jasni komunikaciji s potrošniki, da bi okoljski oznaki zagotovili največji možen vpliv.
In any such scheme, the importance of clear communication to the consumer must be of particular consideration in order to ensure the greatest possible impact of the label.
Končno, tako označevanje nam mora omogočiti konkretne rezultate pri zaščiti in krepitvi trajnosti ribjih staležev Skupnosti.
Ultimately, the label must generate concrete results in terms of protecting and enhancing the sustainability of fish stocks in EU waters.
Sprožitev razprave o pristopu Skupnosti k sistemu okoljskega označevanja za ribiške proizvode
Launching a debate on a Community approach towards eco-labelling schemes for fisheries products
Sporočilo Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru glede sprožitve razprave o pristopu Skupnosti k sistemu okoljskega označevanja za ribiške proizvode
Launching a debate on a Community approach towards eco-labelling schemes for fisheries products
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o evropskem socialnem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/1999
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (9060/4/2006 – C6‑0188/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (9060/4/2006 – C6‑0188/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča
– having regard to its position at first reading
Sprejeta besedila , 6.7.2005, P6_TA(2005)0281 . v prvi obravnavi o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0493 )
Texts Adopted, 6.7.2005, P6_TA(2005)0281 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0493 )
Še neobjavljeno v UL. ,
OJ not yet published. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 67 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6‑0220/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0220/2006 ),
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o evropskem socialnem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/1999
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999
o krizi družbe „Equitable Life Assurance Society“
on the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society
- ob upoštevanju člena 193 Pogodbe ES,
- having regard to Article 193 of the EC Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju Sklepa 95/167/ES, Euratom, ESPJ Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z dne 19. aprila 1995 o določbah, ki podrobneje urejajo uresničevanje preiskovalne pravice Evropskega parlamenta
- having regard to Decision 95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 19 April 1995 on the detailed provisions governing the exercise of the European Parliament's right of inquiry
UL L 113, 19.5.1995, str.
OJ L 113, 19.5.1995, p.2. ,
Besedila sprejeta, P6_TA (2006) 0011. ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0011 ,
- ob upoštevanju člena 176 Poslovnika,
- having regard Rule 176 of its Rules of Procedure,
- ob upoštevanju vmesnega poročila Preiskovalnega odbora o krizi družbe „Equitable Life Assurance Society“ ( A6-0221/2006 ),
- having regard to the interim report of the Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society ( A6-0221/2006 ),
A. ker člen 193 Pogodbe ES zagotavlja pravno podlago, da Parlament ustanovi začasni Preiskovalni odbor za preiskavo domnevnih kršitev ali nepravilnosti pri izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti; ker je to pomemben sestavni del nadzornih pooblastil Parlamenta,
A. whereas Article 193 of the EC Treaty provides a legal basis for the establishment by the Parliament of a temporary Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions or maladministration in the implementation of Community law; whereas this constitutes an important element of the Parliament's supervisory powers,
B. ker je posebna narava preiskovalnega odbora preučiti obstoječi organ zakonodaje Skupnosti in njen način izvajanja s strani Komisije ali držav članic, in ker področje uporabe preiskave omejujejo mandat Preiskovalnega odbora ter tudi primarna in sekundarna zakonodaja Skupnosti,
B. whereas the particular nature of a Committee of Inquiry is to look at the existing body of Community legislation and the way it has been implemented, either by the Commission or by the Member States and whereas the scope of the inquiry is limited by the mandate of the Committee of Inquiry as well as by primary and secondary Community law,
C. ker se je na podlagi predloga Konference predsednikov Parlament na plenarnem zasedanju 18. januarja 2006 odločil, da ustanovi Preiskovalni odbor za preučitev krize družbe Equitable Life Assurance Society in da bi preiskovalni odbor preučil veliko s tem povezanih vprašanj ter oblikoval vse predloge, ki so za to potrebni,
C. whereas on the basis of a proposal by the Conference of Presidents, the Parliament decided at its plenary session on 18 January 2006 to set up a Committee of Inquiry to look into the crisis of Equitable Life Assurance Society, and that the Committee of Inquiry would investigate a large series of related issues and would make any proposals that it deemed necessary in the matter,
D. ker narava preiskovalnega odbora preprečuje sporočanje kakršnih koli sklepov, ki izhajajo iz preiskave, preden preuči, ali je mandat izpolnjen; ker zato ni mogoče niti zaželeno, da preiskovalni odbor predloži ugotovitve o različnih vidikih mandata na začetni stopnji dela,
D. whereas the nature of a Committee of Inquiry prevents it from advancing any conclusions arising out of its investigations before it considers that its mandate has been fulfilled; whereas, therefore, it is neither possible nor desirable for the Committee of Inquiry to submit any observations on the various aspects of its mandate at this early stage of its work,
E. ker je preiskovalni odbor odobril delovni dokument, ki določa organiziran pristop ter vzpostavlja jasne zasnove ukrepov in preiskave,
E. whereas the Committee of Inquiry has approved a working document setting out a structured approach and establishing clear lines of action and investigation,
F. ker je preiskovalni odbor v okviru proračuna za strokovno znanje v zvezi s prvimi tremi smernicami preiskave, opredeljenimi v delovnem dokumentu, naročil zunanje študije in zdaj čaka na rezultate,
F. whereas the Committee of Inquiry has commissioned external studies under its expertise budget concerning the first three lines of investigation identified in the working document, and is currently awaiting the results,
G. ker so vprašanja, ki jih obravnava preiskovalni odbor, splošno pomembna, kar presega posebne skrbi evropskih državljanov, ki jih to neposredno zadeva, zlasti v zvezi s primernim delovanjem notranjega trga za zavarovalne produkte, pravilnim izvajanjem zakonodaje Skupnosti in primernimi mehanizmi odškodnin, ki so na voljo državljanom, zlasti v čezmejnih primerih, kjer je zadevni zakonodajalec pod nadzorom matične države,
G. whereas the issues dealt with by the Committee of Inquiry have a general significance that goes beyond the particular concerns of the European citizens who are directly affected, in particular as regards the adequate functioning of the internal market for insurance products, the correct implementation of Community law and the adequacy of redress mechanisms available to citizens, in particular in cross-border situations where the regulator concerned is under home-country control,
H. ker so lahko vprašanja, ki jih obravnava preiskovalni odbor, splošno pomembna za projekt Solventnost II, zlasti za možne prihodnje določbe o pravilih, ki urejajo sredstva in obveznosti zavarovalnic za usklajevanje sredstev in obveznosti, pozavarovalne dogovore ter posledice računovodskih in aktuarskih politik,
H. whereas the issues dealt with by the Committee of Inquiry may have a general significance for the Solvency II project, in particular for possible future provisions on the rules governing the assets and liabilities of insurance undertakings, matching assets to liabilities, reinsurance arrangements, and the implications of accounting and actuarial policies,
I. ker mora preiskovalni odbor upoštevati že opravljene preiskave v Združenem kraljestvu, zlasti tiste, ki jih je izvedel lord Penrose, in v celoti preučiti stalne preiskave, kot je preiskava parlamentarnega varuha človekovih pravic v Združenem kraljestvu,
I. whereas the Committee of Inquiry should take into account the investigations already undertaken in the United Kingdom, especially those carried out by Lord Penrose, and should give full consideration to the investigations that are ongoing, such as that of the UK Parliamentary Ombudsman,
1. spodbuja preiskovalni odbor, da nadaljuje delo in v celoti izpolni mandat, ki mu ga je podelil Parlament v Sklepu z dne 18. januarja 2006, in podpira vse ukrepe ter pobude, ki vodijo k izpolnitvi mandata;
Encourages the Committee of Inquiry to pursue its work and to implement fully the mandate given by Parliament in its Decision of 18 January 2006 and supports all the actions and initiatives leading to the accomplishment of the mandate;
4. prosi Komisijo, da še naprej podpira delo Preiskovalnega odbora in mu pri tem pomaga, ob polnem upoštevanju načela zanesljivega sodelovanja in z zagotavljanjem vse mogoče tehnične in politične podpore, tudi kadar se preiskuje ukrep Komisije ali pomanjkanje ukrepa;
Asks the Commission to continue to support and assist the work of the Committee of Inquiry, with full respect for the principle of loyal cooperation, providing all the technical and political support possible even where the Commission's action, or lack of action, is the subject of scrutiny;