natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju člena 255 Pogodbe ES, ki govori o dostopu do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije,
– having regard to Article 255 of the EC Treaty, which relates to access to documents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission,
– ob upoštevanju člena 195 in člena 207 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 195 and 207 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju Laakenske izjave o prihodnosti Evropske unije
– having regard to the Laeken Declaration on the future of the European Union
Priloga I k sklepom predsedsedstva ob zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Laeknu 14. in 15. decembra 2001. ,
Annex I to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council of Laeken of 14 and 15 December 2001. ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva ob Evropskem svetu v Sevilli 21. in 22. junija 2002,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Seville European Council of 21 and 22 June 2002,
– ob upoštevanju člena 3(7) Statuta evropskega varuha človekovih pravic
– having regard to Article 3(7) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman
UL L 92, 9.4.2002, str.
OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 in člena 195(3) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 45 and 195(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0056/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0056/2006 ),
A. ker je evropski varuh človekovih pravic v členu 195 Pogodbe ES pooblaščen za sprejemanje pritožb državljanov Unije glede nepravilnosti pri dejavnostih institucij ali organov Skupnosti,
A. whereas Article 195 of the EC Treaty empowers the European Ombudsman to receive complaints from any citizen of the Union concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies,
B. ker so pritožniki v primeru 2395/2003/GG evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic trdijo, da seje Sveta, ko zaseda v vlogi zakonodajalca, ne potekajo v skladu s členom 1(2) Pogodbe EU in so za javnost odprte le takrat, ko to predvidevata člena 8 in 9 poslovnika Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002, naknadno spremenjenega 22. marca 2004
B. whereas the complainants in complaint 2395/2003/GG to the European Ombudsman alleged that meetings of the Council when acting in its legislative capacity are not consistent with Article 1(2) of the EU Treaty and are only open to the extent provided for in Articles 8 and 9 of the Council's Rules of Procedure of 22 July 2002, subsequently amended on 22 March 2004
UL L 106, 15.4.2004, str.
OJ L 106, 15.4.2004, p.
C. ker pritožniki menijo, da bi morale biti seje Sveta, kadar nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca, odprte za javnost in v ta namen zahtevajo spremembo poslovnika Sveta,
C. whereas the complainants considered that meetings of the Council acting in its legislative capacity should be public and requested a change in the Council's Rules of Procedure to that effect,
D. ker v skladu s členom 12(2) Uredbe (ES) Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 1049/2001 z dne 30. maja 2001 ter členom 7 poslovnika Sveta, slednji nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca v smislu drugega pododstavka člena 207(3) Pogodbe ES kadar sprejema predpise, ki so pravno zavezujoči v državah članicah ali zanje v obliki uredb, direktiv, okvirnih sklepov in sklepov na podlagi ustreznih določb v Pogodbah, z izjemo razprav, ki vodijo k sprejetju notranjih ukrepov, upravnih ali proračunskih aktov, aktov, ki se nanašajo na medinstitucionalne ali mednarodne odnose ali nezavezujočih aktov (kot so zaključki, priporočila ali resolucije),
D. whereas, under Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and Article 7 of the Council’s Rules of Procedure, as amended, the Council acts in its legislative capacity within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 207(3) of the EC Treaty when it adopts rules which are legally binding in or for the Member States, by means of regulations, directives, framework decisions or decisions, on the basis of the relevant provisions of the Treaties, with the exception of discussions leading to the adoption of internal measures, administrative or budgetary acts, acts concerning inter-institutional or international relations or non-binding acts (such as conclusions, recommendations or resolutions),
E. ker je v smislu zgornje opredelitve zakonodajne dejavnosti Sveta njegova nezakonodajna dejavnost sorazmerno manjša v primerjavi z njegovo zakonodajno dejavnostjo in ker bi moralo zato pri odločanju veljati pravilo preglednosti, zaupnost pa naj bi veljala le v primeru nezakonodajne dejavnosti, kjer je to primerno, ker se v skladu s členom 1(2) Pogodbe EU odločitve v Evropski uniji sprejemajo "čim bolj javno in v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani",
E. whereas, according to the above definition of its legislative activity, the Council’s non-legislative activity is proportionally much less than its legislative activity and whereas transparency should accordingly be the rule in respect of its deliberations, confidentiality applying only to its non-legislative activity, where appropriate, whereas, pursuant to Article 1(2) of the EU Treaty, decisions in the EU should be taken "as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizens",
F. ker je 19. novembra 2003 generalni sekretar Sveta Solana v odgovoru na odprto pismo pritožnikov navedel, da obstaja široka podpora za odprtje zakonodajnih posvetovanj Sveta za javnost,
F. whereas, on 19 November 2003, Mr Solana, the Council's Secretary General, in his reply to the complainants' open letter stated that opening up the Council's legislative deliberations to the public was an issue that found the very widest support,
G. ker je Svet v odgovoru evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic priznal velik pomen načela odprtja za javnost, ki je, med drugim, opredeljeno s členom 1(2) Pogodbe EU,
G. whereas the Council, in its reply to the Ombudsman, acknowledged that the principle of openness laid down inter alia in Article 1(2) of the EU Treaty is of great importance,
H. ker Svet v svojem poslovniku, spremenjenem leta 2004, predpisuje večje odprtje za javnost tistih sej, na katerih nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca,
H. whereas the Council, in its Rules of Procedure, as amended in 2004, introduced rules that provide for greater openness as regards the meetings in which it acts in its legislative capacity,
I. ker so države članice oktobra 2004 podpisale Pogodbo o Ustavi za Evropo, ki vsebuje izrecno določbo, da se Svet, ko se posvetuje in glasuje o zakonodajnih aktih, sestaja ob navzočnosti javnosti,
I. whereas, in October 2004, the Member States signed the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, which contains an express provision to the effect that the Council is to meet in public when considering and voting on draft legislative acts,
J. ker Svet v odgovoru na posebna vprašanja evropskega varuha človekovih pravic ni navedel nobenih ovir za izvajanje sprememb njegovega poslovnika, kot so zahtevali pritožniki, niti se ni skliceval na načela ali višje cilje, na podlagi katerih bi upravičeno zavrnil odprtje za javnost tistih sej, na katerih nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca, ter hkrati trdil, da je sprejetje njegovega poslovnika politično in institucionalno vprašanje, o katerem odloča Svet sam,
J. whereas, in its reply to specific questions from the Ombudsman, the Council did not mention any obstacles to the implementation of the amendment of its Rules of Procedure, as requested by the complainants, nor any principles or aims of a higher order that would entitle it to refuse to open to the public the meetings in which it acts in its legislative capacity, but contended that the adoption of its Rules of Procedure was a political and institutional matter to be decided upon by the Council itself,
K. ker je evropski varuh človekovih pravic v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 1997
K. whereas, in his Annual Report for 1997
http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/report97/pdf/en/rap97_en.pdf opredelil nepravilnost kot tako delovanje javnega telesa, ki ni v skladu z zanj zavezujočimi pravili ali načeli,
http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/report97/pdf/en/rap97_en.pdf , the European Ombudsman considered that maladministration occurs when a public body fails to act in accordance with a rule or principle which is binding upon it,
L. ker je varuh človekovih pravic ugotovil, da zavračanje javnosti sej Sveta brez utemeljenega razloga, kadar deluje v vlogi zakonodajalca, pomeni nepravilnost,
L. whereas the Ombudsman concluded that the fact that the Council refused to decide to meet publicly whenever it acts in its legislative capacity without giving good reasons for that refusal was an instance of maladministration,
M. ker je varuh človekovih pravic v osnutku priporočila Svetu v skladu s členom 3(6) Statuta evropskega varuha človekovih pravic navedel: "Svet Evropske unije bi moral ponovno preučiti zavrnitev odprtja za javnost tistih svojih sej, na katerih nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca"; ker je varuh v svojem Posebnem poročilu ponovil svoje priporočilo Svetu in predlagal, da Evropski parlament obravnava morebitno sprejetje njegovega priporočila v resoluciji,
M. whereas, in his draft recommendation to the Council pursuant to Article 3(6) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman, the Ombudsman stated that: "The Council of the European Union should review its refusal to decide to meet publicly whenever it is acting in its legislative capacity"; whereas, in his Special Report, the Ombudsman reiterated his recommendation to the Council and suggested that the European Parliament consider adopting his recommendation as a resolution,
N. ker, zlasti kadar Svet sprejema akte pod "točko A", razprava in zakonodajno delo dejansko potekata v odboru COREPER, omenjene akte pa Svet samo odobri,
N. whereas, in particular when Council adopts acts as "A-points", the actual debate and legislative work is done by COREPER and the acts in question are merely approved by Council,
O. ker Svet kot zakonodajalec deluje tudi na sejah spravnih odborov,
O. whereas the Council also acts in its legislative capacity in the meetings of the conciliation committees,
P. ker načelo javne odgovornosti ministrov predvideva, da so stališča in odločitve pri glasovanju v Svetu držav članic znana javnosti,
P. whereas the accountability and public responsibility of ministers require that Member States' positions and votes in Council be known to the public,
Q. ker zakonodajni veji EU še vedno delujeta na podlagi deloma različnih informacij; ker so dokumenti, ki jih hrani Parlament, večinoma javni, medtem ko Svet pogosto dela tudi z dokumenti in podatki, označenimi za zaupne, vključno takrat, ko obravnava vprašanja, o katerih se odloča s postopkom soodločanja,
Q. whereas the two legislative branches of the EU still work on the basis of partially different sets of information; whereas the documents held by Parliament are in general public, while the Council often works also on the basis of classified documents and information, including when it considers certain questions which require adoption under the co-decision procedure,
R. ker je britansko predsedstvo Sveta podalo dva alternativna predloga za odziv na varuhova priporočila, pri čemer eden od njiju vključuje spreminjanje poslovnika Sveta, z drugim pa bi si prizadevali za večjo preglednost znotraj veljavnih predpisov,
R. whereas the UK Presidency made two alternative proposals to the Council with the aim of responding to the Ombudsman's recommendations, one of which would have involved amending Council's Rules of Procedure, while the other merely sought to improve transparency within the scope of the existing rules,
S. ker se je Svet za tem odločil, da ne bo spreminjal svojega poslovnika,
S. whereas the Council subsequently chose not to amend its Rules of Procedure,
– v demokratičnih pravnih sistemih, kot so v Evropski uniji (člen 6(1) Pogodbe EU) in njenih državah članicah je bistvena značilnost zakonodaje, da ni le zavezujoča, ampak se tudi sprejema na način, ki omogoča informiranje in sodelovanje evropskih državljanov preko svojih predstavnikov na nacionalni (parlamenti in nacionalne vlade) in na evropski ravni (Evropski parlament);
– under democratic legal systems such as those of the European Union (Article 6(1) of the EU Treaty) and its Member States, the essential characteristic of the law is not only that it is binding but also that it is adopted in such a manner as to allow the people of Europe to be informed and to participate through their representatives at both national (national parliaments and governments) and European (European Parliament) level;
– takšna možnost sodelovanja državljanov bi bila resno prizadeta, če bi eden od zakonodajnih organov omogočili dostop le do pripravljalnih posvetovanj in razprav potem, ko je bil končni sklep že sprejet ali kasneje;
– this possibility of public participation would be gravely undermined if one of the legislative authorities were required to make its preparatory deliberations and discussions accessible only when the final decision is taken or later;
– ohranjanje različnih standardov glede preglednosti med Parlamentom in Svetom nima logične obrazložitve, zlasti ne pri postopku soodločanja;
– continued disparities between Parliament and Council as regards standards of transparency have no logical justification, particularly in codecision procedures;
– če so pripravljalna posvetovanja v parlamentarnih odborih in plenarne razprave javni, bi morale biti razprave o istih zadevah na ministrski ravni tudi javne;
– given that preparatory deliberations in parliamentary committees and debates in plenary sitting are public, debates at ministerial level on the same matters should also be public;
– potreba po preglednosti je še bolj očitna, ko iščeta Parlament in Svet soglasje pri soodločanju med prvim branjem v Parlamentu (ki se zgodi v enem od treh primerov); v takih situacijah je stališče Parlamenta znano le, če je hkrati znano stališče večine, ki izhaja iz Sveta, njegove sestave in argumentov, kot osnove stališč, sprejetih s strani nacionalnih delegacij,
– the need for transparency is all the more manifest when Parliament and Council are seeking an agreement in codecision at first reading in Parliament (which happens in one out of every three cases); in such situations, the position of Parliament itself can only be understood if at the same time any majority view emerging in the Council, its composition and the arguments underlying the positions of the national delegations are known,
– ohranjanje zaupnosti posvetovanj Sveta glede teh vrst pogajanj predstavlja spodkopavanju načela preglednosti in učinkovitosti, ki velja za postopke Parlamenta;
– insistence on the confidentiality of Council deliberations in respect of negotiations of this nature is tantamount to undermining the principle of transparency and efficiency which governs Parliament’s own procedures;
– ta vidik ni upoštevan v zaključkih, ki jih je Svet sprejel 22. decembra 2005, ki zagotavljajo preglednost njegovih pripravljalnih posvetovanj samo v začetku postopka in po končnem glasovanju (razen, če Coreper ne odloči drugače);
– this aspect was not taken properly into account in the Conclusions adopted by the Council on 22 December 2005, which provide for the transparency of its preparatory deliberations only at the outset of proceedings and after the final vote (unless COREPER decides to the contrary);
4 obžaluje, da na teh področjih ni napredka in da Svet tega vprašanja ne omenja v svojih zaključkih z dne 22. decembra 2005;
4 Regrets the absence of progress in these areas and the Council’s own silence on the matter in its Conclusions of 22 December 2005;
6. poudarja, da načela večnivojskega upravljanja v Evropski uniji pomenijo načela dobrega upravljanja: sodelovanje, preglednost, odgovornost, učinkovitost in kohezija;
Points out that the principles of multi-level governance in the EU are the principles of good governance: participation, transparency, accountability, efficiency and cohesion;
11. meni, da bi bilo z javnimi sejami delo Sveta bolj pregledno in bi za evropske državljane pridobilo večji smisel, povečalo pa bi se tudi zaupanje javnosti v delovanje Evropske unije in njenih predstavnikov;
Believes that meeting in public would make the Council's work both more transparent and more relevant to European citizens and would increase the public's confidence in the way the European Union and its representatives work;
17. kot korak v pravi smeri pozdravlja Sklep Sveta z dne 22. decembra 2005, vendar obžaluje, da Svet ni upošteval priporočila varuha človekovih pravic, naj spremeni svoj poslovnik;
Welcomes the Council Conclusions of 22 December 2005 as a step in the right direction, but regrets that the Council did not follow the Ombudsman's recommendation to amend its Rules of Procedure;
Svetu predlaga sprožitev pilotskega projekta o "bolj preglednem odločanju", v okviru katerega bi se o eni ali več zakonodajalskih tem razpravljalo na popolnoma odprtih in dostopnih sejah Sveta, s posebnim poudarkom na razlagi uporabljenih postopkov in sprejetih sklepov, tako da bi državljanom olajšali razumevanje;
Suggests to the Council the launch of a pilot project on "more transparent decision making", wherein one or more topical legislative issues would be discussed in a fully open and accessible Council meeting, with special emphasis being laid on explaining the procedures followed and decisions made, so that they would be easier for citizens to understand;
Posebno poročilo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic o priporočilu Svetu Evropske unije glede odprtja za javnost sej Sveta, kadar slednji nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca (primer 2395/2003/GG)
The Special Report from the European Ombudsman following the draft recommendation to the Council of the European Union in complaint 2395/2003/GG concerning the openness of the meetings of the Council when acting in its legislative capacity
člena 45 in 195(3)
Rules 45 and 195(3)
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2005 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................74
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT......................................................82
MNENJE Odbora za proračunski nadzor (*).......................................................80
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL........................................88
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0181 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0181 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 279 Pogodbe ES in člena 183 Pogodbe Euratom v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0234/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 279 of the EC Treaty and Article 183 of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0234/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenj Odbora za razvoj ter Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6‑0057/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6‑0057/2006 ),
(1) Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 , v nadaljnjem besedilu „finančna uredba“, določa zakonsko podlago reforme finančnega poslovodenja.
(1) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, hereinafter “the Financial Regulation”, lays down the legal foundations of the financial management reform.
Zaradi te njene lastnosti morajo biti njeni osnovni elementi ohranjeni in okrepljeni.
As such, its essential elements should be maintained and strengthened.
Poleg tega vzpostavlja proračunska načela, ki jih je treba spoštovati v vseh zakonodajnih aktih in od katerih je treba kar se da malo odstopati.
Moreover, it establishes budgetary principles which should be respected by all legislative acts and from which derogations should be kept to a strict minimum.
(1) Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002, v nadaljnjem besedilu „finančna uredba“, določa zakonsko podlago reforme finančnega poslovodenja.
(1) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, hereinafter “the Financial Regulation”, lays down the legal foundations of the financial management reform.
(2) Praktične izkušnje so pokazale, da so potrebne določene spremembe za lažje izvrševanje proračuna in uresničevanje osnovnih ciljev politik; priporočljiva je tudi prilagoditev nekaterih zahtev glede postopka in dokazil, zato da bodo bolj sorazmerni s povezanimi tveganji in stroški.
(2) Certain amendments are justified in light of practical experience in order to facilitate budget implementation and the realisation of the underlying policy objectives and to adjust some procedural and documentary requirements so as to make them more proportionate to the risks and cost involved .
(2) Praktične izkušnje so pokazale, da so potrebne določene spremembe za lažje izvrševanje proračuna in uresničevanje osnovnih ciljev politik; priporočljiva je tudi izrecna vključitev načela o sorazmernem upravljanju iz člena 5 Pogodbe ES , zato da se ohrani sorazmerje med povezanimi tveganji in stroški.
(2) Certain amendments are justified in light of practical experience in order to facilitate budget implementation and the realisation of the underlying policy objectives and to enshrine expressly the principle of proportionality of administrative action set forth in Article 5 of the EC Treaty, so as to make it clear that it is proportionate to the risks and cost involved .
Priporočljivo je opozoriti na vseobsegajoče načelo sorazmernosti upravljanja institucij Skupnosti, da bi se izognili prekomerni obremenitvi državljanov Unije in tretjih oseb z upravljanjem.
Reference should be made to the universal principle of proportionality of the Community institutions' actions so as to prevent Union citizens and third parties from being overburdened as a result of administrative action.
(3) Vse spremembe morajo prispevati k doseganju ciljev reform Komisije, pripomoči k izboljšanju ali zagotavljanju dobrega finančnega poslovodenja ter izboljšati zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti pred goljufijo in nezakonitim ravnanjem, s čimer bodo pripomogle k oblikovanju razumnega zagotovila zakonitosti in pravilnosti finančnih poslov.
(3) All amendments must contribute to achieving the objectives of the Commission's reforms, should help improve or ensure sound financial management, and should enhance the protection of the Communities’ financial interests against fraud and illegal activities, thus contributing to obtaining a reasonable assurance of the legality and regularity of financial operations.
(3) Vse spremembe morajo prispevati k doseganju ciljev reform Komisije, pripomoči k izboljšanju ali zagotavljanju dobrega finančnega poslovodenja ter učinkoviti zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti pred goljufijo in nezakonitim ravnanjem, s čimer bodo pripomogle k oblikovanju razumnega zagotovila zakonitosti in pravilnosti finančnih poslov.
(3) All amendments must contribute to achieving the objectives of the Commission's reforms, should help improve or ensure sound financial management, and should more effectively protect the Communities’ financial interests against fraud and illegal activities, thus contributing to obtaining a reasonable assurance of the legality and regularity of financial operations.
(5a) Na podlagi prvega odstavka protokola k Pogodbi ES o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki je bil priložen Amsterdamski pogodbi z dne 2. oktobra 1997, so vse institucije pri izvajanju svojih pristojnosti dolžne upoštevati načelo sorazmernosti,v skladu s katerim ukrepi Skupnosti ne smejo prekoračiti okvirov, potrebnih za doseganje ciljev Pogodbe.
(5a) Pursuant to point 1 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, annexed to the EC Treaty and appended to the Treaty of Amsterdam of 2 October 1997, each institution, in exercising the powers conferred on it, is required to comply with the principle of proportionality, according to which any action by the Community must not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaty.