natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
F. meni, da mora imeti kmetijstvo pri upravljanju in ohranjanju biotske raznovrstnosti kot njen uporabnik pomembno vlogo; poleg tega ocenjuje, da mora skupna kmetijska politika v prihodnje spodbujati trajnostne načine proizvodnje, ki bodo gospodarsko uspešni, hkrati pa bodo ugodno vplivali na izboljšanje in obnovo biotske raznovrstnosti pri kar največjem številu vrst, živali, rastlin in mikroorganizmov;
F. whereas, as a user of biodiversity, agriculture has a key role to play in managing and maintaining that biodiversity; and whereas the common agricultural policy (CAP) must henceforth promote sustainable production models which, while being economically viable, enable action to be taken on the environment and on regenerating and rehabilitating the biodiversity of as many animal, plant and microbial species as possible,
1. pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije zaradi njegovega konceptualnega pristopa, prednostnih ciljev za leti 2007 in 2008 ter ključnih podpornih ukrepov ter meni, da je to dobro izhodišče za bolj osredotočen pristop za uresničitev cilja biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010; odobrava odločitev, da se poudari krepitev izvajanja sedanje politike in ukrepov;
Welcomes the Commission Communication for its conceptual approach, its priority objectives for 2007-2008 and its key supporting measures, and sees it as a good starting point for a more focused approach to achieving the 2010 biodiversity target; endorses also the decision to place the emphasis on strengthening the implementation of existing policy and existing measures;
10. v tej zvezi poziva Komisijo, naj preuči in pripravi predloge za praktične ukrepe, da bodo stroški izgube biotske raznovrstnosti všteti v dejavnosti, ki so za raznovrstnost izrazito škodljive;
In this contexts calls on the Commission to study and make proposals for practical measures to internalise the cost of biodiversity loss in activities that have a significant negative impact on biodiversity;
PODROČJE POLITIKE 1 – BIOTSKA RAZNOVRSTNOST IN EU
POLICY AREA 1 – BIODIVERSITY AND THE EU
Najpomembnejši habitati in vrste (Cilj 1)
Most important habitats and species (Objective 1)
19. pozdravlja dejstvo, da ima Komisija namen izvajati skupno pomorsko politiko, ki bo temeljila na celovitem pristopu k oceanom, in opozarja na potrebo po okoljskem in ekološkem ohranjanju oceanov, ki bo zagotavljalo gospodarski razvoj sektorjev, kot so ribištvo, turizem in drugi;
Welcomes the Commission’s intention to implement a common maritime policy based on a holistic approach to the oceans, and draws attention to the need for environmental and ecological preservation of the oceans as a guarantee for the economic development of sectors such as fisheries, tourism and others;
Širše podeželje in širše morsko okolje (Cilja 2 in 3)
Wider countryside and wide marine environment (Objectives 2 & 3)
23. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi poseben akcijski program za boj proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in zakonsko neurejenemu ribolovu, ki močno ogroža obnovo ribjih staležev;
Calls on the Commission to draw up a specific action programme to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU), which constitutes a fundamental threat to the replenishment of fish stocks;
28. poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja in podpre študije, povezane z gojenjem novih vrst v ujetništvu, zlasti tistih, ki jih je prizadel prelov, s čimer bi se odzvali na potrebe trga, ki bi lahko bile zaradi zmanjšanega ulova okrnjene;
Urges the Commission to encourage and support studies linked to the rearing of new species in captivity, particularly species affected by overfishing, thereby responding to market needs that are potentially threatened by the reduction in catches;
UL L 25, 1.2.1999, str.
OJ L 25, 1.2.1999, p.
1. , ki v okviru zakonodaje o trgovini s semeni tvori pravno podlago za ohranjanje sort, ogroženih zaradi genske erozije, z njihovo uporabo na mestu samem in na kmetijah;
1. , which provides a legal basis to permit, within the framework of legislation on the seed trade, the conservation, by use in situ and on farms, of varieties threatened by genetic erosion;
36. se zaveda nevarnosti, ki jo za ekosisteme predstavljajo nekateri pesticidi, zaviralci gorenja in druge obstojne, bioakumulativne in strupene kemikalije; pri tem poudarja pomen učinkovitega izvajanja uredbe REACH; poudarja, da je treba s pomočjo plenilcev na vrhu prehranske piramide v kopenskem, sladkovodnem in morskem okolju spremljati bioakumulacijo teh onesnaževal; poleg tega meni, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti nevarnostim uporabe pesticidov, ki so namensko strupena in se uporabljajo v okolju; poudarja, da mora nova evropska zakonodaja o pesticidih – predlog uredbe o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet ( KOM(2006)0388 -
Recognises the threat to ecosystems from certain pesticides, flame retardants and other persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic chemicals; stresses the importance in this regard of effective implementation of REACH; stresses the need to monitor bio-accumulation of such pollutants through the use of top predators in terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments; considers furthermore that special attention should be given to the hazards of pesticide use as they are designed to be toxic and are used in the environment; points out that the new European pesticide legislation - proposal for a regulation on the placing of plant protection products on the market ( COM(2006)0388 -
37. poudarja, da ima spodbujanje zaščitenih označb porekla in geografskih označb ključno vlogo pri ohranjanju regionalnih posebnosti, celotne z njimi povezane podeželske kulture ter zadevnih tradicionalnih načinov kmetovanja, s katerimi se lahko podeželje in podeželski načini kmetovanja ohranijo kot habitati za številne prostoživeče vrste;
Points out that the promotion of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications has a key role to play in safeguarding regional specialities, the entire rural culture associated with them and the related ancestral farming practices that enable the countryside and rural farming systems to be preserved as habitats for many wild species;
40. opozarja na novo uredbo o razvoju podeželja (programsko obdobje 2007–2013), ki med drugim zagotavlja financiranje Nature 2000, vsebuje kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe in ukrepe za ohranitev genetskih virov v kmetijstvu, podporo trajnostnemu gospodarjenju z gozdovi ter ohranja plačila za območja z omejenimi naravnimi možnostmi;
Draws attention to the new rural development regulation (programming period 2007-2013), which provides inter alia for financing Natura 2000, contains agri‑environmental measures and measures to preserve genetic resources in agriculture and support sustainable forest management, and maintains payments for areas with natural handicaps;
42. poziva, naj se pridelava in uporaba biomase za proizvodnjo energije ter kot gorivo izkoristi kot možnost za povečanje biotske raznovrstnosti v kmetijstvu; meni, da morajo to odražati tudi sredstva za raziskave v sedmem okvirnem programu za raziskave ter da se zaradi pridelave biomase ne sme izgubljati biotska raznovrstnost v Evropski uniji ali zunaj nje;
Calls for the cultivation and use of biomass for the production of energy and as a fuel to be seized as an opportunity to increase biodiversity in agriculture; considers that this should also be reflected in the funding of research under the Seventh Framework Programme for research and that the cultivation of biomass should not be allowed to lead to a decline in biodiversity, either within or outside the European Union;
Regionalni in ozemeljski razvoj (Cilj 4)
Regional and territorial development (Objective 4)
Invazivne tuje vrste in tuji genotipi (Cilj 5)
Invasive alien species and Alien Genotypes (Objective 5)
51. pozdravlja namen, ki ga je izrazila Komisija, da uvede posebno zakonodajo za izdajo eko certifikatov za ribe, in poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s tem čim prej predloži zakonodajni predlog;
Welcomes the Commission's declared intention to introduce specific legislation for the eco-certification of fish and urges it to come forward with a legislative proposal as rapidly as possible;
Mednarodno upravljanje (Cilj 6)
International governance (Objective 6)
53. se zaveda ogroženosti biotske raznovrstnosti na odprtem morju; poziva k sprejetju dogovora o zaščiti biotske raznovrstnosti na odprtem morju v okviru konvencije ZN o pomorskem pravu; poziva EU, naj pri tem ohrani vodilno vlogo;
Recognises the threat to biodiversity in the high seas; urges the putting in place of an agreement on the protection of biodiversity in the high seas under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea; urges the EU to continue taking a lead role in this;
Zunanja pomoč (Cilj 7)
External assistance (Objective 7)
59. poudarja, da je biotski raznovrstnosti v programih zunanje pomoči Komisije in držav članic kljub tem prizadevanjem namenjenih zelo malo sredstev; pozdravlja četrto dopolnitev sredstev Svetovnega sklada za okolje, vendar obžaluje, da to ne pomeni realnega povečanja sredstev za biotsko raznovrstnost; poudarja izjemen pomen, ki ga ima dodelitev omejenih namenskih sredstev za prednostne naloge, povezane z biotsko raznovrstnostjo v tretjih državah;
Points out that, despite these aspirations, there is very limited 'earmarked' funding for biodiversity in the Community's and Member States' external assistance programmes; welcomes the recent fourth replenishment of the Global Environment Facility but regrets that this does not represent any increase in funding for biodiversity in real terms; stresses the vital importance of committing limited earmarked funds to biodiversity priorities in third countries;
61. izraža veliko zaskrbljenost, ker je kljub političnim prizadevanjem v resnici zelo verjetno, da potrebe biotske raznovrstnosti ne bodo upoštevane niti v novi generaciji državnih in regionalnih strateških dokumentov ter da Komisija v tem pogledu ne bo dejavneje sodelovala z državami prejemnicami;
Expresses strong concern that, despite the policy aspirations, in reality there is a high risk that the new generation of Country and Regional Strategy Papers will continue to disregard biodiversity needs without a much more proactive engagement of the Commission with recipient countries in this regard;
Trgovina (Cilj 8)
Trade (Objective 8)
65. izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi pritiska na stalež rib, neciljne vrste in morske habitate v vodah tretjih držav, ki se je v preteklosti še povečal s partnerskimi sporazumi o ribolovu; poudarja, da je ključnega pomena s partnerskimi sporazumi o ribolovu zagotoviti ohranjanje staleža rib na ravni, ki podpira čim večjo trajnost ulova, in čim bolj zmanjšati vpliv na neciljne vrste in morske habitate; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo ribolovne flote EU delovale v skladu s temi sporazumi;
Expresses concern that fisheries partnership agreements have in the past exacerbated pressures on fish stocks, non-target species and marine habitats in the waters of third countries; stresses the critical importance of ensuring that fisheries partnership agreements ensure that fish stocks are sustained at levels that support maximum sustainable yield and minimise impacts on non-target species and marine habitats; urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that EU fishing fleets operate in line with these agreements;
Podnebne spremembe (Cilj 9)
Climate change (Objective 9)
67. poudarja, da je treba z oceno ukrepov za zmanjšanje učinkov spremembe podnebja, na primer razvoja obnovljivih energetskih virov, zagotoviti, da bodo ti ustrezno upoštevali morebitne škodljive vplive na biotsko raznovrstnost, in da je treba takšne vplive preprečevati ali zmanjšati zlasti pri vetrnih elektrarnah in biogorivu;
Stresses the importance of ensuring that climate change mitigation measures, such as the development of renewable sources of energy, should be assessed to ensure they take due account of potential negative impacts on biodiversity and that such impacts should be prevented or minimised – notably in relation to windfarms and biofuels;
Znanje (Cilj 10)
Knowledge (Objective 10)
71. je zaskrbljen zaradi upada številnih vrst rib in zaradi dejstva, da se pri določanju skupnega letnega dovoljenega ulova le delno ali sploh ne upoštevajo znanstvena poročila Mednarodnega sveta za raziskovanje morja (ICES); se zaveda, da znanstvena poročila niso politični diktat, vendar meni, da morajo za neupoštevanje znanstvenih priporočil obstajati tehtni razlogi in dobri argumenti; meni, da morata Komisija in Svet v tem primeru predložiti tudi dokaze, da se v EU res spoštuje načelo največje trajnosti ulova;
Is concerned about the decline in many fish species and about the fact that the scientific reports of ICES are only partially adhered to, if at all, when setting the annual TACs; recognises that the scientific reports are not political diktats, but considers that there must be strong reasons and good arguments for not complying with the scientific recommendations; considers that, in that case, the Commission and Council must also produce arguments to show that the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) principle is genuinely being complied with in the EU;
PODPORNI UKREPI
SUPPORTING MEASURES
76. obžaluje dejstvo, da sredstva, namenjena Skladu za razvoj podeželja, nikakor ne zadostujejo za dosego želenega učinka na upravljanje omrežja Natura 2000 v zvezi s kmetijstvom in gozdarstvom, pri čemer je skromna zlasti podpora za izboljšanje znanja in nadzora;
Deplores the fact that the available EAFRD funding falls woefully short of what would be necessary to produce the desired effect on management of the Natura 2000 network, as determined by farming and forestry, the support proposed for improving knowledge and monitoring being particularly meagre;
Krepitev odločanja
Strengthening decision-making
80. se zaveda visoke kakovosti ocen vpliva političnih ukrepov, povezanih s pobudami okoljske politike Skupnosti; obžaluje, da je okoljska razsežnost ocen vpliva ukrepov, povezanih s političnimi pobudami na drugih področjih, pogosto šibka; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pregledajo vse nove politične pobude in se prepričajo, da te nimajo občutnejšega škodljivega vpliva na biotsko raznovrstnost, če pa se ta pokaže, naj zagotovijo, da bodo v postopku ocene vpliva ustrezno upoštevana vprašanja biotske raznovrstnosti, kar velja tudi za vplive na storitve ekosistemov;
Recognises the high quality of policy impact assessments relating to Community environmental policy initiatives; regrets that the environmental dimension in policy impact assessments relating to policy initiatives in other sectors is frequently weak; urges the Commission and Member States to screen all new policy initiatives for potential significant negative impacts on biodiversity and to ensure that where such potential impacts are identified, there is adequate treatment of biodiversity considerations, including impacts on ecosystem services, in the impact assessment process;
82. poudarja pomen celovitega in doslednega izvajanja in uveljavljanja direktiv o pticah in habitatih; vztraja, naj Komisija in države članice tej nalogi namenijo dovolj sredstev in pozornosti;
Emphasises the significance of full and consistent implementation and enforcement of the Birds and Habitats Directives; insists that the Commission and Member States dedicate sufficient resources and attention to this task;
84. poziva Komisijo, naj izvaja pritisk na odgovorne za nenehne zamude pri ustanavljanju regionalnih svetovalnih svetov za ribištvo, ki so zelo pomembni za izboljšanje spremljanja in ohranjanja ribolovnih virov;
Urges the Commission to exert pressure on those responsible for the successive delays in setting up regional advisory councils for fisheries, which are vital for improved monitoring and preservation of fish resources;
86. poudarja, da je pomembno krepiti osveščenost javnosti o pomenu biotske raznovrstnosti in ekosistemov za blaginjo in dobrobit; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj občutno razširijo programe in kampanje, namenjene izobraževanju in obveščanju širše javnosti, oblikovanju političnih zahtev po ukrepih in krepitvi aktivnega sodelovanja širše javnosti pri ukrepih ohranjanja narave; poudarja, da je pri tem pomemben dostop do informacij in sodstva;
Stresses the importance of raising public understanding of the importance of biodiversity and ecosystems for prosperity and well-being; urges the Commission and Member States to significantly strengthen programmes and campaigns to educate and inform the general public, to build political demand for action, and to strengthen the active participation of the general public in conservation measures; stresses the importance of access to information and justice in this regard;
88. ugotavlja, da evropske živalske vrtove in akvarije letno obišče več kot 100 milijonov ljudi, ter se zaveda, da imajo te ustanove pomembno vlogo pri ozaveščanju javnosti o okolju;
Notes that Europe's zoos and aquaria are visited annually by more than 100 million people, and recognises that these institutions have a significant role to play in raising public environmental awareness;
SPREMLJANJE, OCENA IN PREGLED
MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REVIEW
93. pozdravlja predlog, da bo Komisija Svetu in Parlamentu predložila srednjeročno oceno (do konca leta 2008) in končni oceni (do konca leta 2010 in 2013) napredka pri uresničevanju ciljev iz akcijskega načrta Komisije; poudarja, da je treba rezultate teh ocen vključiti v postopke večjih revizij politike in proračuna, kot so revizija proračuna 2008-09 in revizije politike in proračuna po letu 2013; poziva Komisijo, naj predloži celostno dolgoročno strategijo glede biotske raznovrstnosti po letu 2010;
93.Welcomes the Commission's proposal for submission of mid-term (to end 2008) and final (to end 2010 and to end 2013) evaluations of progress towards the targets of the Commission's Action Plan Communication to the Council and Parliament; stresses that the findings of these evaluations should inform broader policy and budgetary review processes including the 2008-09 budget review and policy and budgetary reviews for the post-2013 period; urges the Commission to put forward a comprehensive long-term strategy on biodiversity after 2010;
Kaj je biotska raznovrstnost?
What is Biodiversity?
Biotska raznovrstnost je vseobsegajoč pojem, ki opisuje raznolikost vseh življenjskih in naravnih procesov na Zemlji.
This is an all encompassing term to describe the variety of all life and natural processes on Earth.
V konvenciji o biološki raznovrstnosti je opredeljena kot "raznolikost živih organizmov iz vseh virov [...]; to vključuje raznovrstnost znotraj samih vrst, med vrstami in raznovrstnost ekosistemov."
The Convention on Biological Diversity defines it as “the variability among living organisms from all sources [...] this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems”
Člen 2 Konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti.
Article 2, CBD. .
Dejstva in številčni podatki
Facts and Figures
Razvoj, ki je človeštvu v preteklih desetletjih prinašal koristi, gre z roko v roki z upadom raznolikosti in obsega naravnih sistemov, torej biotske raznovrstnosti.
The development humanity has benefited from in the last decades has been associated with a decline in both the variety and extent of natural systems that is of biodiversity.
Ta izguba biotske raznovrstnosti na ravneh ekosistemov, vrst in genov ni zaskrbljujoča samo zaradi velike vrednosti, ki jo ima narava, ampak tudi zato, ker povzroča upad „storitev ekosistemov“, ki jih zagotavljajo naravni sistemi.
This loss of biodiversity, at the levels of ecosystems, species and genes, is of concern not just because of the important intrinsic value of nature, but also because it results in a decline in ‘ecosystem services’ which natural systems provide.
Te storitve vključujejo proizvodnjo hrane, goriva, vlaken in zdravil, regulacijo voda, zraka in podnebja, ohranjanje rodovitnosti tal in kroženje hranilnih snovi.
These services include production of food, fuel, fibre and medicines, regulation of water, air and climate, maintenance of soil fertility, cycling of nutrients.
Kot je zapisano v presoji ekosistemov tisočletja, objavljeni marca 2005, so človekove dejavnosti privedle planet na rob množičnega izumiranja vrst in še naprej ogrožajo našo dobrobit.
As noted by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) released in March 2005, human activities have taken the planet to the edge of a massive wave of species extinctions, further threatening our own well-being.
Po trenutnih ocenah so na primer stopnje izgub stokrat do tisočkrat višje kot v naravnih pogojih.
For instance, current rates of loss are estimated at 100 to 1,000 times natural background levels.
V presoji tisočletja je posebej poudarjeno, da storitve ekosistemov prispevajo k dobrobiti ljudi, in naveden zaključek, da je prihodnost človeštva odvisna od zdravih ekosistemov.
The Millennium Assessment puts a special emphasis on how ecosystem services contribute to human well-being and concludes that humanity’s future depends on healthy ecosystems.
Naj navedemo nekaj številčnih podatkov:
Some figures in particular:
- Med leti 1970 in 2000 je številčnost vrst upadla za 40 odstotkov.
- The abundance of species has declined by 40% between 1970 and 2000.
- Od leta 2000 se je prvotni gozd vsako leto zmanjšal za 36 milijonov hektarjev.
- Since 2000, 36 million hectares of primary forest have been lost each year.
- V karibski regiji se je površina kamenih koral zmanjšala za 80%.
- In the Caribbean region, hard coral cover has declined by 80%.
- V samo 20 letih je izginilo 35 odstotkov mangrov.
- 35% of mangroves have been lost in just 20 years.
Cilj biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010
The 2010 Biodiversity Target
Evropska unija je v zvezi s temi cilji podala nekaj pomembnih izjav.
The EU has made significant declarations in this regard.
Voditelji držav ali vlad EU so se leta 2001 dogovorili, da bodo „do leta 2010 zaustavili upad biotske raznovrstnosti [v EU]“
EU Heads of State or Government agreed in 2001 “to halt the decline of biodiversity [in the EU] by 2010”
Sklepi predsedstva, Evropski Svet v Göteborgu, 15. in 16. junija 2001. ter „obnovili življenjske prostore in naravne sisteme“
Presidency Conclusions, Göteborg European Council 15 and 16 June 2001. and to “restore habitats and natural systems”
Leta 2002 so se pridružili približno 130 svetovnim voditeljem, ki so sklenili, da je treba „znatno zmanjšati stopnjo izgube biotske raznovrstnosti [na svetovni ravni] do leta 2010“
In 2002, they joined some 130 world leaders in agreeing “to significantly reduce the rate of biodiversity loss [globally] by 2010”
Svetovni vrh o trajnostnem razvoju, načrt izvajanja. .
World Summit for Sustainable Development, Plan of Implementation. .
Cilj zaustavitve izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 je predmet številnih pomembnih mednarodnih sporazumov.
The goal of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 is the subject of several key international agreements.
V vsakem je zabeležena ugotovitev, da se stanje ekosistemov in habitatov hitro slabša, da so mnoge vrste in populacije vse bolj ogrožene in da je treba nujno sprejeti ukrepe, s katerimi bo mogoče zaustaviti upad nenadomestljivih naravnih virov.
Each recognises the rapid degradation of ecosystems and habitats, the increasing threat to many species populations and the urgent need to take action that will halt the decline in irreplaceable natural resources.
Prvič je bil namesto splošnih ciljev, ki ne zagotavljajo želenega učinka ohranitve, sprejet skupni ohranitveni cilj.
For the first time, an overall conservation target has been adopted rather than generally formulated objectives that may or may not have the desired conservation effect.
Zaradi trenutnega hitrega upada biotske raznovrstnosti v Evropi in po svetu ter vse večjega obsega in intenzivnosti številnih človekovih dejavnosti, pa bo cilj, da se zaustavi izguba biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010, pri prilagajanju naših dejavnosti potrebam naravnih sistemov zahteval napore brez primere.
However, given the current rapid decline in biodiversity, both in Europe and worldwide, and the ever-increasing extent and intensity of many human activities, the objective of halting the decline in biodiversity by 2010 will require unprecedented efforts in adapting our activities to the needs of natural systems.