natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· možnost oprostitve v skladu s členom 9(3) se črta, drugače povedano, glede obveznosti prenosa ni nobenih izjem več.
· the exemption option in Article 9(3) to be deleted, i.e. there are to be no exceptions from compulsory transferability.
Obravnavanje mirujočih pravic do pokojnine (člen 5)
Treatment of dormant pension rights (Article 5)
Delavci, ki so svoje pridobljene pravice do pokojnine pustili pri svojem starem delodajalcu (da „mirujejo“), ne smejo biti zapostavljeni.
Employees who leave their acquired pension rights (‘as dormant’) with their former employer must not be penalised.
Biti mora povsem jasno, da za aktivne zavarovance sistema obveznosti za indeksacijo ne pridejo v poštev.
It must be crystal clear that there can be no question of compulsory indexation linked to active scheme members.
Zato vaša poročevalka predlaga, da države članice zagotovijo enako obravnavanje zavarovancev z mirujočimi pokojninskimi pravicami in upokojenih zavarovancev.
Your rapporteur accordingly proposes that Member States must guarantee equal treatment between dormant scheme members and retired scheme members.
Položaj delavcev s pogodbami za določen čas in tistih, ki se znova zaposlijo (člen 6)
Position of temporary workers and returners to the labour market (Article 6)
Komisija predlaga, da bi morali delavci zahtevo za prenos pravic do pokojnine vložiti v 18 mesecih po zaključku (prejšnjega) delovnega razmerja.
The Commission proposes that employees must make application for the transfer of their pension rights within 18 months of terminating their (old) employment relationship.
To je lahko v škodo tistim, ki delovnega mesta ne izgubijo po lastni krivdi ali ki svojo poklicno dejavnost prekinejo začasno, da skrbijo za svoje otroke ali bližnje.
This may impact adversely on persons leaving their job against their will or stopping work temporarily in order to look after children or other close family.
Če bi ta skupina delavcev kasneje (po 18 mesecih) znova začela opravljati poklicno dejavnost, ne bi mogla uveljavljati pravice do prenosa.
If these categories of employee accept another job at a later date (later than 18 months) they would no longer be able to exercise their right of transfer.
Zato poročevalka predlaga, da bi delavcem po začetku novega delovnega razmerja ponudili možnost, da zahtevek za prenos pravic do pokojnine vložijo v roku do šestih mesecev.
Your rapporteur accordingly proposes offering employees the option of submitting an application for transfer of their pension rights for up to six months after acceptance of a new employment relationship.
Glede na raziskavo o delovni sili iz leta 2003 (Eurostat, Evropska komisija) je delovno mesto po enem letu zamenjalo 8,2 % celotne zaposlene delovne sile EU (Danska in Združeno kraljestvo sta s 13 % na vrhu, Švedska in Grčija pa s 5 % na dnu lestvice).
According to the labour force survey of 2003 (Eurostat, European Commission), 8.2% of the EU’s total employed labour force had moved to another job after one year (with Denmark and the UK taking the lead with 13%, and Sweden and Greece at the bottom with 5%).
V EU delavci povprečno ostanejo na istem delovnem mestu 10,6 let, v ZDA pa 6,7 let.
On average, workers in the EU stay in the same job for 10.6 years, compared to 6.7 years in the US.
Podatki glede geografske mobilnosti kažejo, da samo 1,5 % državljanov petindvajseterice živi in dela v državi članici, ki ni njihova država izvora.
As regards the geographical mobility, only 1.5% of EU-25 citizens lives and works in a Member State different from their country of origin.
Stalno prebivališče vsako leto zamenja 7,2 % državljanov EU, od tega 15 % zaradi menjave delovnega mesta, medtem ko se v ZDA 16,2 % prebivalcev preseli vsako leto, od tega 17 % zaradi zaposlitve.
7.2% of EU citizens change their place of residence every year, of which 15% is due to a change in job, while in the US 16.2% of their citizens move home each year, of which 17% for occupational reasons.
Sedanji pravni okvir
Current Legal Framework
Vendar pa je njeno področje uporabe omejeno, saj ne zagotavlja prenosljivosti dodatnih pokojnin ter prilagodljivosti glede pogojev za pridobitev.
Its scope is however limited, failing to ensure transferability of supplementary pensions as well as flexibility as regards to the conditions of acquisition.
Predlog Direktive 2005/214 (COD)
Proposal for a directive 2005/214 (COD)
Predlog zajema vse sisteme dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja, ki temeljijo na delovnem razmerju , z izjemo zakonsko predpisanih sistemov, ki spadajo pod Uredbo 1408/71, kot je francoski sistem AGIRC/ARRCO.
The proposal covers all supplementary pension schemes that are based on an employment relationship with the exception of statutory schemes that fall under the Regulation 1408/71, such as the French AGIRC/ARRCO scheme.
V predlogu niso opredeljeni sistemi z vnaprej določenimi pravicami in sistemi z vnaprej določenimi prispevki.
The proposal does not define defined benefit and defined contribution schemes.
Čeprav se je zgradba pokojninskih sistemov, zlasti tistih z vnaprej določenimi prispevki, spreminjala v skladu z razvojem na trgu, bi bilo treba opisati nekatera splošna načela ter težave pri prenosljivosti zaradi razlik med sistemi.
Although the structure of pension schemes, especially the defined contribution ones, has been changing according to developments in the market, some general principles as well as problems of portability due to differences between the schemes should have been described.
V zvezi s pravicami do pridobitve so v predlogu določene zgornje meje glede pogojev za pridobitev, zato da bi lahko mobilni delavci v času svoje zaposlitve pridobili zadostne pravice do dodatne pokojnine.
In terms of acquisition rights , the proposal puts into place ceilings on acquisition conditions so as to enable mobile workers to build up sufficient supplementary pension rights throughout their career.
Kljub razlikam med nacionalnimi predpisi pa obdobje, ki je potrebno za pridobitev pokojninskih pravic (po izteku katerega zavarovanci sistema dobijo pridobljene pravice), ne sme presegati dveh let, če je bila dosežena minimalna starost za pridobitev pravic, ki je določena na 21 let.
Despite the fact that national rules differ, the vesting periods (after which members of the scheme obtain acquired rights) cannot be longer than two years provided the minimum age for the acquisition has been attained which is set at 21 years.
Poleg tega čakalno obdobje, po katerem lahko delojemalec postane zavarovanec pokojninskega sistema, ne sme biti daljše od enega leta (pod pogojem, da je dopolnil minimalno starost).
In addition, the waiting period before an employee can become a member of the pension scheme must not be longer than one year (subject to having attained a minimum age).
Treba je poudariti, da lahko kratko obdobje za pridobitev pokojninskih pravic ter kratka čakalna obdobja pomenijo višje stroške za vse zavarovance.
It should be stressed that the low limits for vesting periods, and waiting periods may also result in higher costs for all members of the scheme.
Koncept „nekaznovanja“ odhajajočega delavca je treba natančneje opredeliti.
However, the concept of ‘not penalising’ the outgoing worker requires more clarity.
Da ne bi prišlo do prevelikih upravnih stroškov, ki nastanejo pri upravljanju z velikim številom mirujočih pravic manjše vrednosti, predlog v tej določbi omogoča prenos ali izplačilo glavnice, ki predstavlja pridobljene pravice, če te ne presežejo mejne vrednosti, določene v zadevni državi članici.
Also in this provision, in order to avoid excessive administration costs stemming from the management of a large number of low-value dormant rights, the proposal allows for the transfer or payment of a capital sum representing the acquired rights, as long as they do not exceed a threshold set by the Member State concerned.
V zvezi s pravicami do prenosa lahko delavci svoje pravice iz prejšnjega sistema bodisi ohranijo (razen če so tako majhne, da bi to povzročilo prevelike upravne stroške) bodisi jih prenesejo v nov sistem.
In terms of transfer rights , workers will be able to either maintain their rights in a former scheme (unless these are so low that this would lead to excessive administrative costs) or transfer them to another scheme.
Vendar pa imajo države članice možnost, da sisteme brez skladov (kot so dokladni sistem ali podporni skladi) oprostijo zahteve po prenosu, da bi ohranile njihovo finančno vzdržnost.
However, the Member States will have an option to exclude unfunded schemes (such as pay-as-you-go or support relief funds) from this transfer requirement so as to preserve their financial sustainability.
Ta določba se ponovno preuči najkasneje do 1. julija 2018.
This provision will be reviewed no later than by 1 July 2018.
Kar zadeva koncept prenosa, je treba razlikovati med "prenosom pravic" (člen 6) in "prenosom sredstev" (točka (j) člena 3).
Regarding the concept of transfer, it is important to differentiate between the concept of ‘transfer of rights’ (Article 6) and the concept of ‘transfer of capital’ as it is used in Article 3 (j).
V predlogu direktive ni doslednosti pri rabi teh konceptov.
The proposal of a directive is not consistent in the use of these concepts.
V praksi delavci sredstva preprosto vzamejo iz starega sistema (dvig) in jih vložijo v nov sistem v skladu s pravili novega sistema (polog).
In practice the workers simply take the capital out of the old scheme (transfer-out) and put it into the new scheme according to the rules of the new scheme (transfer-in).
Od novega sistema je nemogoče zahtevati, da mora zagotavljati enako raven pravic.
It is impossible to oblige the new scheme to guarantee the same level of rights.
Poleg tega predlog ne obravnava vprašanja prenosa iz sistemov, ki imajo trenutno premalo sredstev in pri katerih bi lahko izplačila negativno vplivala na pravice ostalih zavarovancev.
Finally, the proposal does not address the issue of transfers from schemes which are temporarily under-funded and where a transfer payment from the scheme could adversely affect the rights of the remaining members.
V zvezi z razkritjem predlog poziva k dodatnim ukrepom poleg zahtev po zagotavljanju informacij iz člena 11 Direktive o dejavnostih in nadzoru institucij za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje (2003/41/ES).
In terms of disclosure, the proposal calls for measures in addition to information requirements defined in Article 11 of the occupational pension funds’ directive (2003/41/EC).
Člen 11 te direktive predvideva, da zavarovanci in upravičenci pokojninskega sistema prejmejo informacije o letnih računovodskih izkazih in poročilih, o načelih naložbene politike pokojninskega sklada ter ureditvi glede prenosa ali izplačil prejemkov.
Article 11 of IORP foresees for the members and beneficiaries of a pension scheme to receive the information on annual accounts and reports, on investment policy principles of the pension fund as well as on arrangements relating to the transfer or payment of benefits when due.
Po členu 7 novega predloga ta določba ne zadostuje; v njem je tudi določena zahteva, da mora upravitelj sistema dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja obvestiti vsakega odhajajočega delavca, ki je ali ni zavarovanec sistema, o posledicah prekinitve delovnega razmerja za njegove pravice do dodatne pokojnine.
Article 7 of the new proposal regards this provision as insufficient and sets a requirement for a manager of the supplementary pension scheme to inform every outgoing worker, being a member of the scheme or not , of the consequences of termination of employment for his/hers supplementary pension rights.
Taka določba lahko pomeni nepotrebne stroške za upravljanje pokojninskega sistema.
It is possible that such provision may also incur unnecessary costs for the management of a pension scheme.
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Obstajajo pomisleki glede finančne vzdržnosti, pravičnosti in solidarnosti do zavarovancev, ki ostanejo v sistemu, ne le za sisteme brez skladov, za katere Komisija predlaga, da bi jih izvzeli iz direktive, ampak tudi za sisteme in pokojninske sklade, ki bodo vanjo vključeni.
There are concerns with regard to financial sustainability and fairness and solidarity with respect to the participants remaining in the schemes, not only for the unfunded schemes that the Commission proposes to exempt from the Directive, but also for schemes and pension funds that will fall under the Directive.
To vprašanje je treba obravnavati na splošno za vse sisteme, ne pa tako, da se preprosto izvzamejo sistemi brez skladov.
These concerns have to be dealt with in genera for all schemes, and not by simply excluding only unfunded schemes.
(10a) Zaradi finančne vzdržnosti sistemov dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja je treba pozorno spremljati prenosljivost pokojninskih pravic, zlasti kar zadeva učinek razlik v aktuarskih predpostavkah in napovedi glede obrestnih mer na dejansko uporabo možnosti prenosa pravic.
(10a) For reasons of the financial sustainability of supplementary pension schemes, the transferability of pension rights should be closely monitored, particularly with respect to the effects of the differences in actua ria l estimates and interest rate projections on the actual use of the option to transfer rights.
Obstajajo pomisleki glede finančne vzdržnosti, pravičnosti in solidarnosti do zavarovancev, ki ostanejo v sistemu, ne le za sisteme, za katere Komisija predlaga, da bi jih izvzeli iz direktive, ampak tudi za sisteme in pokojninske sklade, ki bodo vanjo vključeni.
There are concerns with regard to financial sustainability and fairness and solidarity with respect to the participants remaining in the schemes, not only for schemes that the Commission proposes to exempt from the Directive, but also for schemes and pension funds that will fall under the Directive.
Ta učinek je treba pozorno spremljati.
The effects have to be closely monitored.
Poleg tega so strokovnjaki zaskrbljeni, da se bo z direktivo okrepilo prehajanje od sistemov z vnaprej določenimi pravicami k sistemom z vnaprej določenimi prispevki.
There is also strong concern with experts that the Directive may reinforce trends from Defined Benefits to Defined Contribution types of pension schemes.
(11a) Za preprečitev neskladnosti pri prenosu bi morali nadzorni organi sodelovati znotraj držav članic in med njimi.
(11a) To avoid inconsistent transposition, supervisory authorities should cooperate within and across the Member States.
Problematično je vprašanje določitve pristojnega nadzornega organa ali mehanizmov sodelovanja med nadzornimi organi v državi članici (ponavadi sta to finančni nadzorni organ, pristojen za pokojninske sklade, in ministrstvo za delo/socialne zadeve, ki nadzira pokojnine na splošno) ter po vsej EU.
Problematic is the question of defining the competent supervisory authority or cooperation mechanisms between supervisory authorities in one member state (usually financial supervisor regulating pension funds and social affairs/labour ministry overseeing pensions in general) as well as across the EU.
(11b) Ker razlike v davčni obravnavi prispevkov v pokojninske sklade in pravic iz pokojninskih skladov močno ovirajo mobilnost in prenos pokojninskih pravic, je treba pozorno spremljati učinek davčne obravnave glede teh prenosov in po potrebi oblikovati ustrezne ukrepe.
(11b) Since differences in the tax treatment of contributions to and benefits from pension funds are major obstacles to the mobility and transfer of pension rights, the effects of the tax treatment in relation to such transfers should be closely monitored and, if necessary, should lead to the formulation of approp ria te measures.
Cilj direktive v zvezi z mobilnostjo, zlasti na podlagi določb glede prenosa pokojninskih pravic čez meje, je težko doseči, če obenem ni rešeno vprašanje davčne obravnave.
The objectives of the Directive on mobility particularly by way of the provisions for transfer of pension rights cross border may be difficult to reach if tax treatment is not dealt with at the same time.
(14a) Komisija bi morala pet let po začetku veljavnosti te direktive opraviti analizo stroškov in koristi ter oceniti vpliv te direktive na število delodajalcev, ki ponujajo sisteme pokojninskega zavarovanja.
(14a) The Commission should conduct a cost-benefit analysis five years after the entry into force of this Directive, assessing its impact on the number of employers offering pension schemes.
Pomembno je, da se zaradi te direktive ne zmanjša število delodajalcev, ki so pripravljeni ponuditi sisteme pokojninskega zavarovanja.
It is important that this Directive does not result in a reduction in the number of employers willing to offer pension schemes.
Namen te direktive je olajšati uresničevanje pravice do prostega gibanja delavcev in pravice do poklicne mobilnosti znotraj iste države članice z zmanjšanjem ovir, ki so jih ustvarila posebna pravila o sistemih dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja v državah članicah.
The aim of this Directive is to facilitate the exercise of the right of workers to freedom of movement and of the right to occupational mobility within the same Member State, by reducing the obstacles created by certain rules governing supplementary pension schemes in the Member States.
Namen te direktive je olajšati uresničevanje pravice do prostega gibanja delavcev in poklicno mobilnost znotraj iste države članice in med državami članicami z zmanjšanjem ovir, ki so jih ustvarila posebna pravila o sistemih dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja v državah članicah.
The aim of this Directive is to facilitate the exercise of the right of workers to freedom of movement and to facilitate occupational mobility within the same Member State and between Member States , by reducing the obstacles created by certain rules governing supplementary pension schemes in the Member States.
Med cilji te direktive bi morala biti zlasti lažja poklicna mobilnost med državami članicami.
The aim of the directive should particularly include the facilitation of occupational mobility between Member States.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za sisteme dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja , razen za sisteme, ki jih zajema Uredba (EGS) št. 1408/71 .
This Directive applies to supplementary pension schemes apart from the schemes covered by Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 .
Ta direktiva se uporablja za pravice, ki izhajajo iz sistemov prostovoljnega in obveznega dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja na podlagi delovnega razmerja.
This Directive applies to entitlements arising out of voluntary and compulsory supplementary pension schemes on the basis of an employment relationship.
Zaradi recipročnosti ni pošteno, da bi področje uporabe direktive omejili le na tiste dodatne sisteme iz drugega stebra, ki niso zajeti v direktivi 1408/71.
For reasons of reciprocity it is not fair to restrict the scope of the Directive to only those second pillar supplementary schemes that are not covered by 1408/71.
Določbe te direktive so pomembne tudi za sisteme iz direktive 1408/71.
Also for the 1408/71 schemes the provisions of this Directive are relevant.
(c) „zavarovanci“ pomeni osebe, katerim poklicna dejavnost daje, ali bi jim lahko dala pravico do dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja v skladu z določbami sistema dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja ;
(c) “scheme members” means those persons whose occupation entitles them or is likely to entitle them to a supplementary pension in accordance with the provisions of a supplementary pension scheme;
(c) „ aktivni zavarovanci“ pomeni osebe, ki so postale zavarovane po pravilih sistema in ki jim trenutno delovno razmerje daje ali jim bo po izpolnitvi pogojev za pridobitev dalo pravico do dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja v skladu z določbami tega sistema;
(c) “ active scheme members” means those persons who have been granted membership under the rules of the scheme and whose current employment relationship entitles them or will entitle them after the fulfilment of vesting requirements to a supplementary pension in accordance with the provisions of that scheme;
Namen predloga spremembe je pojasniti, da v tej definiciji niso zajeti upokojenci in upravičenci z odloženo uveljavitvijo pravice.
The purpose of this amendment is to make clear that pensioners and deferred beneficiaries are not included in this definition.
Ta direktiva ni namenjena upokojencem, upravičenci z odloženo uveljavitvijo pravice pa so opredeljeni posebej.
This Directive is not aimed at pensioners and deferred beneficiaries are separately defined.
S predlogom spremembe je pojasnjeno tudi, da je aktivni zavarovanec delavec, ki je postal zavarovanec sistema ne glede na to, ali je prestal obdobje za pridobitev pokojninskih pravic.
The amendment clarifies also that an active member is a worker who has been admitted to membership of a scheme whether or not they have passed any vesting period.
Drugače bi si lahko razlagali, da definicija vključuje tudi delavce, ki so v čakalni dobi za dostop do sistema, vendar pa ni mišljeno tako.
Otherwise the definition might be construed as including workers, who are in a waiting period for access to the scheme, and that is not the intention.
(d) „pravice do pokojnine“ pomeni kakršne koli prejemke, do katerih je zavarovanec ali drug upravičenec sistema dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja upravičen v skladu s pravili sistema dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja in, kjer je to primerno, v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo;
(d) “pension rights” means any benefits to which scheme members and others holding entitlement are entitled under the rules of a supplementary pension scheme and, where applicable, under national legislation;
(d) „ pridobljene pravice do pokojnine“ pomeni kakršno koli upravičenost do dodatne pokojnine, pridobljeno po izpolnitvi pogojev v skladu s pravili sistema dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja in, kjer je to primerno, v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo;
(d) “ vested pension rights” means any entitlement to supplementary pensions obtained after the fulfilment of the conditions required by the rules of a supplementary pension scheme and, where applicable, under national legislation;
Po sistemu dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja se lahko zavarovanci izpišejo iz sistema (razen ob upokojitvi) le po končanem obdobju za pridobitev pokojninskih pravic.
Under supplementary pension schemes members only have rights on leaving a scheme (other than on retirement) once any vesting period has been fulfilled.
Ko so pravice pridobljene, je zavarovanec, ki se izpisuje iz sistema, upravičen, da se mu pravice iz sistema ohranijo ali, ob upoštevanju nekaterih omejitev, da se te pravice prenesejo.
Once rights have vested, then a member who leaves the scheme is entitled to have those rights preserved in the scheme, or, subject to some restrictions, to transfer those rights.
Namen dopolnjene definicije pojasniti, da zavarovanec pridobi pravice le po izpolnitvi pogojev za pridobitev.
This amended definition is designed to clarify that a member only acquires such rights once they have fulfilled the vesting requirements.
Poleg tega je izraz „prejemki“ nadomestil izraz „dodatna pokojnina“, ker je ta že opredeljen.
Also the term ‘benefits’ has been replaced by the term ‘supplementary pension’ as this is already defined.
(e) „prenehanje delovnega razmerja“ pomeni odločitev za prekinitev delovnega razmerja;
(e) “termination of employment” means a decision to terminate an employment relationship;
(e) „prenehanje delovnega razmerja“ pomeni prekinitev delovnega razmerja iz razloga, ki ni upokojitev, ali iz razlogov, ki vodijo do izgube pravic v skladu z nacionalnim pravom;
(e) “termination of employment” means the termination of an employment relationship for reasons other than retirement on the one hand or those leading to the loss of entitlements under national law on the other ;