natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- okvirni sklepi Sveta, na primer za boj proti nekaterim oblikam kriminala;
- Council framework decisions, e.g. to combat certain forms of crime;
R. poziva Komisijo, naj pri razvoju akcijskega načrta prevzame predloge iz tega poročila in vključi Parlament v vse vidike priprave in izvajanja akcijskega načrta ter naj se posvetuje s športnimi organizacijami, združenji igralcev in drugimi, ki jih to zadeva;
R. Calls on the Commission, when developing the action plan, to take up the proposals made in this report and to involve Parliament in all aspects of the drafting and implementation of the action plan and to consult sporting organisations, players’ associations and all other interested parties;
S. meni, da posebna agencija EU za šport ni potrebna,
S. Does not regard the establishment of a specific EU Sports Agency as necessary,
T. meni, da bi morala nogometna združenja imeti pravico, da neodvisno vodijo svoj šport, kadar gre za izključno športna pravila; kadar pa vsebujejo omejitve, morajo biti te sorazmerne, tj. upravičene in potrebne za dosego posameznega cilja pri športu,
T. Considers that football’s bodies should be free to govern their sport where their rules are purely sporting; however, considers that, where the rules include restrictions, they must be proportionate, that is, reasonable and necessary to achieve the sporting objective(s) concerned,
U. meni, da mora nogomet zagotoviti medsebojno odvisnost konkurentov in nujno jamčiti, da rezultat tekmovanj ne bo vnaprej znan, kar bi lahko bilo temelj za to, da bi športne organizacije na trgu uporabile poseben okvir za izvedbo in prodajo športnih dogodkov; ker pa ekonomska vrednost teh dejavnosti narašča, posebni okvir ne bi zagotovil avtomatske oprostitve gospodarskih dejavnosti, povezanih s poklicnim nogometom, od konkurenčne zakonodaje Skupnosti;
U. Considers that football must ensure the interdependence of competitors and the need to guarantee the uncertainty of results of competitions, which could serve as a justification for sports organisations to implement a specific framework on the market for the production and the sale of sport events; however, considers that such specific features do not warrant an automatic exemption from the Community competition rules for any economic activities generated by professional football owing to the increasing economic weight of such activities;
V. meni, da je treba uporabiti zakonodajo Skupnosti, kadar gre ob nogometu za gospodarsko ali komercialno dejavnost, zlasti predpise o notranjem trgu in konkurenci;
V. Considers that Community law - in particular internal market and competition rules - applies where football entails an economic or commercial activity;
W. meni, da bi Evropska unija morala zagotoviti jasna navodila, katera "športna" pravila so sama po sebi skladna s pravom Skupnosti in pri katerih "s športom povezanih" pravilih se izvaja zakonodaja Skupnosti;
W. Considers that the European Union should provide clear guidance on the type of ‘sports rules’ that are automatically compatible with Community law and the ‘sports-related rules’ where Community law applies;
X. meni, da je treba uvesti posvetovalni postopek med institucijami EU in združenji evropskega nogometa, da bi vzpostavili mehanizem, s katerim bi ugotavljali, za katera športna pravila in ravnanje velja zakonodaja Skupnosti in za katera ne; meni, da bi tak postopek lahko privedel k formalnemu okvirnemu sporazumu med EU in UEFO.
X. Considers that a consultation process between the EU Institutions and European football authorities needs to be established, so as to provide a mechanism for confirming which sports rules and practices fall outside the scope of Community law and which do not; considers that such a consultation process could give rise to a formal framework agreement between the EU and UEFA.
o vključevanju novih držav članic v skupno kmetijsko politiko
on the integration of the new Member States into the CAP
– ob upoštevanju člena 33 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,
– having regard to Article 33 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
- ob upoštevanju Akta o pogojih pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije,Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike in prilagoditvah Pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija
– having regard to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustment to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded
- ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta z dne 22. marca 2004 o prilagoditvi Akta o pogojih pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike in prilagoditvah Pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija, zaradi reforme skupne kmetijske politike
– having regard to the Decision of the Council of 22 March 2004 adapting the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustment to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, following the reform of the common agricultural policy
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 864/2004 z dne 29. aprila 2004 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003, ki določa skupna pravila za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in uvaja nekatere sheme podpor za kmete, ter o njeni prilagoditvi zaradi pristopa Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške k Evropski uniji
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 of 29 April 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, and adapting it by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 z dne 21. junija 2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 z dne 20. septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP)
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 318/2006 z dne 20. februarja 2006 o skupni ureditvi trgov v sektorju sladkorja
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector
- ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
- ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije za Uredbo Sveta o spremembi in popravku Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete ter o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6–0037/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0037/2007 ),
A. ker so se s širitvijo leta 2004 v Evropski uniji močno povečale kmetijske površine (za približno 27 %), število kmetij (za približno 60 %) ter število zaposlenih v kmetijstvu (za približno 57 %), s čimer sta se povečala tudi proizvodni potencial in vloga kmetijstva; ker povečanje donosnosti na hektar proizvodnje živil in krme omogoča, da se proizvodnji biomase namenjajo zadostne površine, kar povzroča še večje razlike v evropski kmetijski in podeželski strukturi; ker se je ta proces s pristopom Bolgarije in Romunije še okrepil in utrdil,
A. whereas the 2004 enlargement increased substantially the agricultural area (by around 27 %), the number of farms (by around 60 %), and the number of agricultural workers (by around 57 %) in the EU, thereby boosting its production potential and making agriculture more important; whereas higher yields per hectare of food and feed production will release sufficient areas of land for biomass production and this situation has contributed to a further differentiation of the European agricultural and rural fabric; whereas this process has become more marked and has deepened with the accession of Bulgaria and Romania,
B. ker se kmetijstvo v večini novih držav članic zelo razlikuje od kmetijstva Evropske unije petnajsterice glede proizvodne ravni, strukture in velikosti kmetij, in ker v primerjavi s starimi državami članicami zaostaja glede učinkovitosti, stopnje tehnološkega razvoja ter vertikalne in horizontalne povezanosti,
B. whereas agriculture in the majority of the new Member States differs significantly from agriculture in the EU-15 in terms of production levels and structures and the number of farms, and is characterised by lower levels of general efficiency, technological development and vertical and horizontal integration than in the old Member States,
C. ker ima glede na Evropsko unijo petnajsterice kmetijstvo v novih državah članicah večji gospodarski in socialni pomen, saj prispevek tega sektorja k BNP in delež zaposlenih v njem presegata povprečje Evropske unije;
C. whereas agriculture plays a greater economic and social role in the majority of the new Member States than in the EU-15, as the sector’s contribution to the GNI and the proportion of employees working in the sector are above the EU average,
D. ker ima v nekaterih novih državah članicah samooskrbno in delno samooskrbno kmetijstvo velik socialni, kulturni in okoljski pomen,
D. whereas in certain new Member States subsistence and semi-subsistence agriculture are of great social, cultural and environmental importance,
E. ker se nove države članice uspešno in brez zapletov vključujejo v notranji trg ter prispevajo k znatnemu povečanju trgovine s kmetijskimi izdelki in živili v Evropi; ker so nove države članice pravočasno uvedle in uspešno izvajajo veterinarske in fitosanitarne predpise, predpise glede varnosti hrane in organizacije skupnega trga ter druge horizontalne predpise, tako da je bila uporaba posebnih varnostnih ukrepov nepotrebna;
E. whereas the new Member States have been successfully and smoothly integrated into the internal market, contributing to a significant increase of the European agricultural and food trade; whereas the new Member States duly introduced and enforce veterinary, phytosanitary, food safety, common market organisation and other horizontal rules, so that it was not necessary to apply any specific safeguard measures,
F. ker so imele nove države članice socialne in gospodarske stroške zaradi prilagajanja na predpise skupne kmetijske politike in njihovega vključevanja ter prilagajanja na konkurenčno okolje v Evropski uniji; ker je bilo s predpristopnimi sredstvi mogoče le deloma pokriti stroške prilagajanja in vključevanja pred pristopom; ker so se z vstopom v Evropsko unijo pokazale splošne gospodarske in konkurenčne težave novih držav članic, ker skupna kmetijska politika ni prispevala k reševanju teh težav,
F. whereas the new Member States had to shoulder high social and economic costs in order to adapt to and integrate the common agricultural policy (CAP) rules and to adapt to the competitive environment in the EU; whereas the pre-accession funds only partially covered the costs of the adaptation and integration process before the accession; whereas the accession to the EU revealed the general economic and competitiveness problems of the new Member States; whereas the CAP has failed to contribute to solving these problems entirely,
G. ker je skupna kmetijska politika (SKP) sprožila precejšen razvoj in znatne spremembe v kmetijstvu novih držav članic, pojavile pa so se tudi nekatere težave in napetosti, in sicer predvsem zato, ker predpisi SKP ne dovolj podpirajo razvoja uravnoteženega in trajnostnega kmetijskega sektorja, zlasti kar zadeva živinorejo, vrtnarstvo ter povezovanje različnih faz dejavnosti,
G. whereas the CAP triggered considerable development and significant changes in the agriculture of the new Member States, and whereas some problems and tensions have arisen mainly due to the fact that the CAP rules do not support sufficiently the development of a balanced, sustainable agricultural sector, especially as animal husbandry, horticulture and up- and downstream integrations are concerned,
H. ker je bilo z aktom o pristopu predvideno dolgo obdobje postopnega uvajanja (9 let) z nizko začetno stopnjo (25% stopnje, ki velja za EU) neposrednih plačil za nove države članice, čeprav zanje v celoti veljajo predpisi notranjega trga in proračunskega prispevka; ker raven stroškov in prihodkov v novih državah članicah ne upravičuje takšne stopnje diferenciacije, ki povzroča neenake konkurenčne pogoje za kmete iz novih držav članic,
H. whereas the Act of Accession introduced a long phasing-in (nine years), with a low starting level (25 %) for the direct payments in the new Member States, though internal market and budgetary contribution rules fully apply to them; whereas cost and income levels in the new Member States do not justify this degree of differentiation, which results in unequal conditions for the new Member States’ farmers in terms of competition,
I. ker težave, ki jih morajo rešiti nove države članice, zahtevajo predvsem strukturne spremembe za povečanje konkurenčnosti; ker so ukrepi skupne kmetijske politike v podporo prihodkom in zagotavljanju cen bistveno prispevali k takemu povečanju,
I. whereas the problems which should be tackled in the new Member States are, primarily, those requiring structural changes to strengthen competitiveness; whereas CAP measures supporting incomes and guaranteeing prices significantly contributed to such strengthening,
J. ker Komisija in Svet nista takoj pokazala razumevanja za posebne težave novih držav članic in jim ponudila potrebne pomoči (na primer težave na trgu sadja in zelenjave, zlasti pri jagodičju, češnjah in jabolkih, neupravičena prepoved Rusije in Ukrajine za uvoz iz Poljske, sprememba in predlagana odprava intervencijskih predpisov za koruzo in uvoz medu iz tretjih držav),
J. whereas the Commission and the Council have been late or reluctant in understanding the new Member States’ special problems and offering the necessary help (for example problems on the fruit and vegetables market, especially as regards soft fruits, cherries and apples, the unjustified ban on Polish exports by Russia and Ukraine, the modification and proposed abolition of maize intervention rules, honey imports from third countries),
K. ker je v novih državah članicah premalo proizvajalcev tudi lastnikov v živilsko-predelovalnem sektorju in ker distribucijske verige zlorabljajo svoj položaj premoči, kar resno omejuje konkurenčnost kmetov ter njihovo sodelovanje in vključevanje,
K. whereas the clear shortage of producer-owners in the new Member States in the food‑processing industry and abuse of the dominant position of commercial chains seriously limit the competitiveness of the farmers and their cooperation and integration,
L. ker je 8 od 10 novih držav članic za neposredna plačila izbralo shemo enotnega plačila na površino,
L. whereas 8 out of 10 new Member States chose the single area payment scheme (SAPS) for the direct payments,
M. ker so bile potrebe po pomoči Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja v novih državah članicah precej večje od razpoložljivih proračunskih sredstev za obdobje 2004-2006, hkrati pa so izvedbeni predpisi programov za razvoj podeželja omejevali dinamično uporabo dodeljenih sredstev Skupnosti; ker so ti dejavniki precej zmanjšali vpliv drugega stebra SKP v novih državah članicah in se lahko zgodi, da tudi v obdobju novega finančnega okvira ne bodo odpravljeni,
M. whereas the need for community assistance in rural development in the new Member States was significantly higher than the available budgetary allocations for the 2004-2006 period, and at the same time implementation rules of the rural development programmes limited the dynamic utilisation of Community allocations; whereas these factors have considerably narrowed the impact of the of the CAP second pillar in the new Member States, and may persist also during the new financial framework,
1. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bil živilsko-predelovalni sektor novih držav članic v celoti in brez zapletov vključen v skupni trg Evropske unije;
Welcomes the fact that the agricultural and food sector of the new Member States has been integrated thoroughly and smoothly into the common market of the European Union;
4. meni, da je bila na splošno integracija novih držav članic uspešna, vendar to ni vedno očitno, saj mnogo kmetij ni zabeležilo povečanja svojih prihodkov; poudarja, da se je z višjimi odkupnimi cenami in subvencijami deloma izravnalo bistveno povišanje proizvodnih stroškov (na primer zvišanje cen goriva, energije, gnojil, fitofarmacevtskih sredstev in strojev);
Considers that overall the integration of the new Member States has been successful but that the situation is not always clear cut, as not all farms have seen their incomes rise; points out that the increase in purchase prices and in subsidies were partially offset by the significant rises in production costs (for example rises in the cost of fuel, energy, fertiliser, plant protection products and machinery);
7. obžaluje, ker ne leta 2004 ne 2007 niso bila dodeljena dodatna sredstva za širitev, niti tista, ki so bila prvotno predvidena;
Laments the fact that higher quotas were not allocated for either the 2004 or 2007 enlargement, if only at the level initially planned;
Izvajanje skupne kmetijske politike v novih državah članicah
Application of the Common Agricultural Policy in the new Member States
11. meni, da mnogo mesecev Komisija ni pripisovala zadostnega pomena trgovinski zapori na izvoz poljskih kmetijskih proizvodov v Ukrajino in Rusijo in ni sprejela učinkovitih ukrepov za njeno odpravo;
Considers that over a period of several months the Commission failed to attach adequate importance to the ban on the export of Polish agricultural products to Ukraine and Russia or to take effective action to bring it to an end;
16. poudarja pomembno vlogo programov za ureditev podeželja tako zaradi nove tržne usmerjenosti kmetij – denimo na področju predelave in trženja svojih izdelkov ali turizma – kot zaradi nadomeščanja prihodkov za tiste, ki zaradi gospodarskih razlogov opustijo primarno kmetijsko proizvodnjo;
Stresses the important role of the rural development programmes both in establishing a new, market-oriented approach for farms – e.g. in processing and marketing their own products or in tourism – and in creating alternative sources of income for those which abandon basic agricultural production for economic reasons;
24. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Svet sprejel predlog Komisije o ohranitvi sheme enotnega plačila na površino do leta 2010 in udeležbi novih držav članic v shemi pomoči za energetske kulture;
Welcomes the fact that the Council has adopted the proposal of the Commission on the extension of the SAPS until the end of 2010 and on the involvement of new Member States into the energy crop aid scheme;
26. poudarja, da bi morala Komisija v svojih sklepih v okviru skupne kmetijske politike bolj upoštevati težave in pomisleke novih držav članic;
Stresses that the Commission should take the special problems and concerns of the new Member States more into account in its decisions within the framework of the CAP;
Prihodnost skupne kmetijske politike v razširjeni Evropski uniji
Future of the CAP in the enlarged EU
31. meni, da zlasti v državah članicah in regijah, kjer specializirane kmetije odločilno vplivajo na kmetijstvo, sedanji sistem neposrednih plačil v preveliki meri spodbuja gojenje poljščin, ne pomaga vzpostaviti trajnostne živinoreje na ustrezen način ter ne spodbuja in ne olajšuje potrebnih strukturnih sprememb;
Takes the view that, especially in Member States and regions where specialised farms play a decisive role in the agriculture, the present system of direct payments promotes arable cropping too significantly, does not assist properly the establishment of a sustainable animal husbandry and does not promote and facilitate the necessary structural changes;
33. meni, da doseganje ciljev SKP v novih državah članicah zavira tudi nezadostna raven financiranja razvoja podeželja, pomanjkanje učinkovitega sistema za obvladovanje tveganja in kriznih razmer ter preveč toga pravila Skupnosti glede državnih pomoči;
Believes that the achievement of the CAP objectives is also hindered in the new Member States by the insufficient level of rural development financing, by the lack of an efficient risk and crisis management system and by excessively strict Community rules on state aid;
35. poudarja, da je treba pri prihodnji reformi SKP ustrezno upoštevati vse možne dejavnike (na primer posledice že sprejetih finančnih odločitev, reforme SKP, izkušnje novih držav članic, raznolikost evropskega kmetijstva), zlasti pri "zdravstvenem pregledu" SKP in vmesni oceni finančnega okvira 2007-2013 leta 2008-2009;
Emphasises that all possible factors (e.g. consequences of earlier financial decisions, CAP reforms, experiences of the new Member States, the diversity and variety of European agriculture) have to be duly taken into consideration in the future reform of the CAP, particularly during the ‘CAP health check’ and the mid-term review of the 2007-2013 financial framework in 2008-2009;
38. poudarja, da bi moralo zadovoljevanje posebnih potreb držav članic in regij, vključno z rešitvijo težav v novih državah članicah, še naprej potekati na podlagi načela subsidiarnosti z naslednjimi, prilagojenimi instrumenti:
Underlines that fulfilment of the specific needs of the Member States and regions, including problems and difficulties in the new Member States, should be maintained on the basis of subsidiarity with the following, tailor-made instruments:
a) z uvedbo revidiranega sistema neposrednih plačil, vključno z novimi ukrepi, kot so možnosti ponovne prostovoljne vezave, namenjene samo tistim državam članicam, ki se jim zdijo potrebne za uresničitev socialnih, zaposlitvenih in trajnostnih ciljev; razširitev plačil na nove sektorje in nove prejemnike (na primer na jagodičje za predelavo) v okviru revidiranega sistema nacionalnega financiranja in polnega financiranja Skupnosti;
(a) introduction of a revised system of direct payments, including the introduction of new measures such as voluntary recoupling options, to be used only by those Member States which consider this necessary to meet social, employment and sustainability objectives; extension of the payments to new sectors and new beneficiaries (for example soft fruits destined for processing), within the revised system of national financial envelopes and full Community financing,