natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Namen tega predloga spremembe je ponovna vključitev in sprememba vrstnega reda dveh odstavkov, ki sta bila črtana v predlogu Komisije.
This amendment aims at reintroducing two paragraphs which were suppressed in the Commission's proposal, and at changing the order of the paragraphs.
Upravni odbor sprejme triletni delovni program na podlagi osnutka, ki ga predloži direktor Centra, po posvetovanju z znanstvenim odborom in po pridobljenem mnenju Komisije, ter ga posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji.
The management board shall adopt a three-year work programme on the basis of a draft submitted by the Centre's Director, after consulting the Scientific Committee and seeking the opinions of the Commission and shall forward it to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Upravni odbor sprejme triletni delovni program na podlagi osnutka, ki ga predloži direktor Centra, po posvetovanju z znanstvenim odborom in po pridobljenem mnenju Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta , ter ga posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji.
The management board shall adopt a three-year work programme on the basis of a draft submitted by the Centre's Director, after consulting the Scientific Committee and seeking the opinions of the Commission and the European Parliament, and shall forward it to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Pred sprejemom delovnega programa bi se bilo treba posvatovati z Evropskim parlamentom.
The European Parliament should be consulted before the adoption of the work programme .
Člen 9, odstavek 6
Article 9, paragraph 6
Če Komisija izrazi svoje nestrinjanje s triletnim delovnim programom ali letnim delovnim programom, upravni odbor ta programa sprejme s štiripetinsko večino .
In the case where the Commission expresses its disagreement with the three-year or annual work programme, these programmes shall be adopted by the Management Board by a 4/5 majority .
Če Komisija izrazi svoje nestrinjanje s triletnim delovnim programom ali letnim delovnim programom, upravni odbor ta programa sprejme s tričetrtinsko večino .
Where the Commission expresses its disagreement with the three-year or annual work programme, these programmes shall be adopted by the Management Board by a 3/4 majority .
Potreben prag večine bi bil spremenjen od 4/5 na 3/4 za lažje sprejemanje odločitev, če Komisija izrazi nestrinjanje z osnutki delovnih programov.
The majority required would be changed from 4/5 to 3/4 in order to facilitate the taking of decisions where the Commission disagrees with the draft work programmes.
Upravnemu odboru pomaga izvršni odbor.
The Management Board shall be assisted by an Executive Committee.
Izvršni odbor sestavljajo predsednik in podpredsednik upravnega odbora in dva predstavnika Komisije.
The Executive Committee shall be made up of the Chairperson and the Vice‑Chairperson of the Management Board and two Commission representatives.
Direktor sodeluje pri sestankih upravnega odbora, ne da bi imel glasovalno pravico.
The Director shall take part in its meetings , without voting rights.
Izvršni odbor sestavljajo predsednik in podpredsednik upravnega odbora , dva člana upravnega odbora, ki predstavljajo države članice in jih imenuje upravni odbor, in dva predstavnika Komisije.
The Executive Committee shall be made up of the Chairperson and the Vice-Chairperson of the Management Board , two other members of the Management Board representing the Member States and appointed by the Management Board and two Commission representatives.
Direktor sodeluje pri sestankih upravnega odbora.
The Director shall take part in its meetings.
Izvršni odbor se sestane vsaj dvakrat letno in po potrebi, da pripravi odločitve upravnega odbora ter pomaga in svetuje direktorju.
The Executive Committee shall meet at least twice a year and whenever necessary to prepare the decisions of the Management Board and to assist and advise the Director.
Odloča v imenu upravnega odbora o zadevah, ki so predvidene v finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za ECSDZD, in s to uredbo niso pridržane za upravni odbor.
It shall decide on behalf of the Management Board on the matters foreseen in the EMCDDA financial regulation which are not reserved to the Management Board by this Regulation.
Svoje odločitve sprejema z navadno večino.
It shall adopt its decisions simple majority .
Odločitve sprejema soglasno.
Decisions shall be adopted by consensus.
Center vodi direktor, ki ga imenuje upravni odbor na predlog Komisije za petletno obdobje , ki se lahko na predlog Komisije in po oceni enkrat podaljša za največ pet let.
The Centre shall be headed by a Director appointed by the management board on a proposal from the Commission for a five-year period , which on a proposal from the Commission and after evaluation, may be extended once for a period of not more than five years.
Center vodi direktor, ki ga za petletno obdobje imenuje upravni odbor na predlog Komisije in po potrditvi Evropskega parlamenta.
The Centre shall be headed by a Director appointed by the management board on a proposal from the Commission and after approval by the European Parliament for a five-year period .
Predlog temelji na seznamu najboljših kandidatov, ki jih izbere Komisija na podlagi javnega natečaja.
The proposal shall consist of a list of the best ranked candidates selected by the Commission after an open competition.
Na predlog Komisije in po oceni se mandat direktorja lahko enkrat podaljša za največ pet let.
On a proposal from the Commission and after evaluation, the Director’s term of office may be extended once for a period of not more than five years.
Pri oceni Komisija upošteva zlasti:
In the evaluation the Commission shall assess in particular:
Pri oceni upravni odbor upošteva zlasti:
In the evaluation the management board shall assess in particular:
- rezultate, dosežene v prvem mandatu, in način, kako so bili doseženi,
- The results achieved in the first term of office and the way in which they were achieved;
- rezultate, dosežene v prvem mandatu, in način, kako so bili doseženi,
- the results achieved in the first term of office and the way in which they were achieved;
- dolžnosti in zahteve Centra v naslednjih letih.
- The Centre’s duties and requirements in the coming years
- dolžnosti in zahteve Centra v naslednjih letih.
- the Centre's duties and requirements in the coming years.
Oceno se nemudoma predloži Komisiji in Evropskemu parlamentu.
The evaluation shall be submitted without delay to the Commission and to the European Parliament.
Prijavni in izbirni postopek bi morala biti kar se da pregledna zato, da bi pritegnila pozornost vseh potencialnih kandidatov.
The application and selection procedure should be as transparent as possible to attract the attention of all potential candidates.
Upravni odbor, ki je pristojen za imenovanje, bi moral opraviti oceno dela direktorja.
The Management Board, as the appointing authority should carry out the evaluation of the work of the Director.
Odločitev o podaljšanju mandata direktorja bi morala, po potrebi, počakati na oceno upravnega odbora.
The decision to extend the term of office of the Director should be taken only after that, if appropriate.
Ker ocena zadeva osebo z javno funkcijo in agencijo Skupnosti, je pomembno, da je na razpolago Komisiji in Evropskemu parlamentu.
As the evaluation concerns a holder of public office and a Community agency, it is important that it is made available to the Commission and the European Parliament.
Ob imenovanju za prvi mandat od največ dveh mandatov, je lahko kandidat, ki ga predlaga upravni odbor za mesto direktorja, nemudoma povabljen, da da izjavo Evropskemu parlamentu in odgovori na vprašanja, ki mu jih zastavijo poslanci te institucije.
Up on appointment to a first term, out of a maximum of two terms, the candidate nominated by the Management Board for the post of Director may be invited without delay to make a statement before the European Parliament and answer questions put by members of that institution.
Ob imenovanju za prvi mandat od največ dveh mandatov, je kandidat, ki ga predlaga upravni odbor za mesto direktorja, nemudoma povabljen, da da izjavo Evropskemu parlamentu in odgovori na vprašanja, ki mu jih zastavijo poslanci te institucije.
Upon appointment to a first term, out of a maximum of two terms, the candidate nominated by the Management Board for the post of Director shall be invited without delay to make a statement before the European Parliament and answer questions put by members of that institution.
Nastop kandidata za direktorja v Parlamentu pred njegovim dokončnim imenovanjem bi moral biti obvezen, kot velja za ostale decentralizirane agencije.
The appearance of the Director nominee before the Parliament before the final appointment should be made obligatory, as in the case of other decentralised agencies.
Člen 12, naslov
Article 12, title
Zaslišanje direktorja v Evropskem parlamentu
Hearing of the Director before the European Parliament
Zaslišanje direktorja in predsednika upravnega odbora v Evropskem parlamentu
Hearing of the Director and of the Chairperson of the Management Board before the European Parliament
Strokovni vpogled in izkušnje predsednika upravnega odbora sta lahko zelo zanimiva za Evropski parlament.
The expertise and the insight of the Chairperson of the Management Board can be of great interest for the EP.
Vsako leto direktor predloži Evropskemu parlamentu splošno poročilo o dejavnostih Centra.
Each year the Director shall submit to the European Parliament the general report on the Centre’s activities.
Evropski parlament lahko zaprosi tudi za zaslišanje direktorja o vseh zadevah v zvezi z dejavnostmi Centra.
The European Parliament may also ask for a hearing with the Director on any subject related to the Centre’s activities.
Evropski parlament lahko zaprosi tudi za zaslišanje direktorja in predsednika upravnega odbora o vseh zadevah v zvezi z dejavnostmi Centra.
The European Parliament may also ask for a hearing with the Director and the Chairperson of the Management Board on any subject related to the Centre’s activities.
Strokovno znanje in izkušnje predsednika upravnega odbora so lahko zelo zanimivi za Evropski parlament.
The expertise and the experience of the Chairperson of the Management Board can be of great interest for the EP.
Člen 13, odstavek 2, pododstavek 1
Article 13, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1
Upravni odbor imenuje v znanstveni odbor po enega člana na državo članico na predlog držav članic izmed posameznikov, izbranih na podlagi njihovih izkušenj in znanstvene odličnosti na področju drog in zasvojenosti z drogami, ter ob upoštevanju potrebe, da je znanstveni odbor multidisciplinaren in da zajema vsa znanstvena področja, povezana s problematiko drog in zasvojenosti z drogami.
The Management Board shall appoint one member per Member State to the Scientific Committee based on proposals by Member States of individuals selected on the basis of their experience and scientific excellence in the area of drugs and drug addiction, and taking into account the need for the Committee to be multidisciplinary in nature and to cover all scientific fields linked to the problems of drugs and drug addiction.
Ta področja vključujejo, niso pa omejena na: biomedicinske raziskave, nevroznanost, kriminologijo, izobraževalne znanosti, epidemiologijo, ekonomijo, forenzične znanosti, pravo, oceno in analizo politik, politologijo, oceno/raziskave preprečevanja, psihiatrijo zasvojenosti, psihologijo, psihofarmakologijo, javno zdravje, kvalitativne raziskave, socialno delo, statistiko, sociologijo, anketno zbiranje podatkov, toksikologijo ter oceno/raziskave zdravljenja.
Such fields include, but are not restricted to: Biomedical Research, Neuroscience, Criminology, Educational Science, Epidemiology, Economics, Forensic Science, Law, Policy Evaluation and Analysis, Political Science, Prevention Evaluation/Research, Psychiatry of Addiction, Psychology, Psychopharmacology, Public Health, Qualitative Research, Social work, Statistics, Sociology, Survey Research, Toxicology, and Treatment Evaluation/Research.
V znanstvenem odboru bo največ petnajst uveljavljenih znanstvenikov, ki bodo imenovani na podlagi njihove znanstvene odličnosti in neodvisnosti s strani upravnega odbora po objavi razpisa za prijavo interesa v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Scientific Committee shall consist of at most fifteen well-known scientists appointed in view of their scientific excellence and their independence by the Management Board, following the publication of a call for expression of interest in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Izbirni postopek mora zagotoviti, da bodo specialistična področja članov znanstvenega odbora zajemala najpomembnejša znanstvena področja, povezana s problematiko drog in zasvojenosti z drogami.
The selection procedure shall ensure that the specialist fields of the members of the Scientific Committee cover the most relevant scientific fields linked to the problems of drugs and drug addiction .
Znanstveni odbor, v katerem je en predstavnik iz vsake države članice, ni jamstvo za dobro upravljanje.
A scientific committee with one representative from each member state does not give evidence of good governance.
Sistem z omejenim številom strokovnjakov, imenovanih na podlagi javnega natečaja, zagotavlja neodvisno in učinkovito delovanje odbora.
A system with a limited number of experts, appointed after an open competition ensures the independent and efficient functioning of the committee.
Člen 13, odstavek 2, pododstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 13, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 a (new)
Znanstveni odbor pred dokončnim oblikovanjem odločitev upošteva različna stališča strokovnih študij na nacionalni ravni, če so na voljo.
The Scientific Committee shall take into account the different positions expressed in the national expert opinions, if available, before the finalisation of any decision.
Upravni odbor izmed posameznikov, ki jih predlagajo države članice, odobri skupino strokovnjakov, iz katere jih lahko direktor na predlog predsednika znanstvenega odbora občasno izbere največ pet, da sodelujejo na razširjenem znanstvenem odboru iz člena 6(2) Sklepa Sveta 2005/387/PNZ z dne 10. maja 2005 o izmenjavi podatkov, oceni tveganja in nadzoru nad novimi psihoaktivnimi snovmi.
The Management board shall approve, from among those proposed by the Member States, a panel of experts from whom at most five may be chosen from time to time by the Director, acting on the advice of the Chairperson of the Scientific Committee, to serve on the extended Scientific Committee as set out in Article 6.2 of Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on information exchange, risk assessment and control o new psychoactive substances.
Tako sodelovanje bi moralo temeljiti na delovnih dogovorih, sklenjenih z zgoraj navedenimi organi in organizacijami.
Such cooperation should be based on working arrangements concluded with the aforementioned authorities and organisations.
Te dogovore sprejme upravni odbor na podlagi osnutka, ki ga predloži direktor, po pridobljenem mnenju Komisije.
These arrangements shall be adopted by the Management Board on the basis of a draft submitted by the director and after the Commission has delivered an opinion.
Če Komisija izrazi svoje nestrinjanje s temi dogovori, jih upravni odbor sprejme s štiripetinsko večino .
Where the Commission expresses its disagreement with these arrangements, the Management Board shall adopt them by a 4/5 majority .
Če Komisija izrazi svoje nestrinjanje s temi dogovori, jih upravni odbor sprejme s tričetrtinsko večino .
Where the Commission expresses its disagreement with these arrangements, the Management Board shall adopt them by a 3/4 majority .
Sklicujemo se na obrazložitev, ki zadeva predlog spremembe 6.
We can refer to the justification concerning amendment 6.
V okviru tega Komisija po potrebi v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe, predloži predlog za spremembo določb te uredbe glede na razvoj v zvezi z regulativnimi agencijami.
In that context, the Commission shall, if appropriate, present a proposal for revision of the provisions of this Regulation in light of developments in respect of regulatory agencies, in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 251 of the Treaty.
Evropski parlament in Svet proučita ta predlog in ocenita zlasti, ali je treba spremeniti sestavo upravnega odbora v skladu s splošnim okvirom, ki ga je treba sprejeti za evropske regulativne agencije.
The European Parliament and the Council shall examine this proposal and in particular consider whether the composition of the Management Board needs to be revised in accordance with the general framework to be adopted for European regulatory agencies.
V okviru tega Komisija po potrebi v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe, predloži predlog za spremembo določb te uredbe glede na razvoj v zvezi z regulativnimi agencijami.
In that context, the Commission shall, if appropriate, present a proposal for revision of the provisions of this Regulation in light of developments in respect of regulatory agencies, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty.
Izrecna omemba sestave upravnega odbora v okviru ponovnega pregleda določb uredbe ni potrebna.
There is no need to mention explicitly the composition of the Management Board in the context of a revision of the provisions of the Regulation.
Priloga I, oddelek A, točka 2
Annex I, section A, point 2
(2) spremljanje rešitev, ki se uporabljajo za probleme, povezane z drogami;
(2) monitoring the solutions applied to drug‑related problems;
(2) spremljanje rešitev, ki se uporabljajo za probleme, povezane z drogami; zagotavljanje informacij o najboljših praksah v državah članicah ter olajšanje izmenjave tovrstnih praks med njimi;
(2) monitoring the solutions applied to drug‑related problems; providing information on best practices in the Member States and facilitating the exchange of such practices among them.
Predlog ponovnega pregleda Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 302/93 o ustanovitvi Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami (EMCDDA) ima že dolgo zgodovino.
The proposal for a revision of Council Regulation (EEC) No 302/93 on the establishment of a European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) already has a long history.
Pravni vidiki ponovnega pregleda so bili predmet razprave od konca leta 2003, ko je Komisija predložila začetni predlog za ponovni pregled Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 302/93.
Legal aspects of this revision have been debated since the end of 2003, when the Commission submitted an initial proposal for a revision of Council Regulation (EEC) No 302/93.
Kot pravna podlaga je bil takrat izbran člen 308 Pogodbe.
The legal basis chosen at that time was Article 308 of the Treaty.
V skladu s tem je bilo potrebno opraviti posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom, ki je v zvezi s tem aprila 2004 podal svoje mnenje (COD 2003/0311).
Accordingly, the European Parliament had to be consulted, and delivered an opinion in April 2004 (COD 2003/0311).
Po več razpravah v okviru horizontalne skupine za droge (pristojne delovne skupine Sveta) je bila sprejeta odločitev o spremembi pravne podlage predloga z izbiro člena 152, poglavje Zdravstvo.
After discussions within the Horizontal Drugs Group - the relevant working group of the Council - it was decided to alter the legal basis of the proposal to Article 152 in the Health Chapter.
Sprememba pravne podlage zahteva tudi spremembo postopka, saj je v okviru člena 152 predviden postopek soodločanja.
The amendment of the legal basis also entails a change of procedure, as Article 152 requires codecision.
Pravna služba Evropskega parlamenta je podala mnenje, v katerem je opozorila na možne težave v primeru nadaljevanja dela v okviru začetnega predloga.
An opinion from the European Parliament's Legal Service indicated that problems might arise if any further work were to be done on the original proposal.
Zato je Komisija predložila nov predlog, ki vključuje sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta v okviru postopka soodločanja.
The Commission therefore submitted a new proposal, involving the European Parliament under codecision.
Sedanji predlog za ponovni pregled razveljavlja in nadomešča prejšnji predlog Komisije, ki ga je umaknila zaradi uresničevanja"boljše zakonske ureditve".
The present proposal for revision cancels and replaces the former Commission proposal, which the Commission has withdrawn as part of the 'better regulation' exercise.
Predmet novega predloga Komisije je krepitev treh prejšnjih sprememb uredbe, širitev vloge Centra in njegova prilagoditev novi evropski stvarnosti po širitvi.
The subject of the new Commission proposal is consolidation of three previous amendments to the establishing regulation, an increase in the role of the Centre and its adaptation to the new reality of Europe after enlargement.
V skladu s tem bo Center v bodoče namenil večjo pozornost novim smernicam na področju uživanja drog, kot na primer hkratni uporabi dovoljenih in prepovedanih psihoaktivnih snovi.
In future, the Centre will accordingly devote more attention to new trends in drug use, such as the combination of licit and illicit psychoactive substances.
Predlog je bil oblikovan tudi z namenom prilagoditve delovanja organov Centra na širitev in na vsakdanje dejavnosti Evropske unije.
The proposal is also designed to adapt the operation of the Centre's bodies in order to take account of enlargement and the everyday practice of the European Union.
Stališče poročevalke
The rapporteur's position
Poročevalka v veliki meri podpira predlog.
The rapporteur can largely endorse the proposal.
V svoji zadnji obliki predlog upošteva številne ideje in predloge Evropskega parlamenta iz prvega poročila (COD 2003/0311).
In its latest form, it already takes account of a number of the European Parliament's ideas and suggestions as set out in the first report (COD 2003/0311).
To vključuje zastopanost Parlamenta v upravnem odboru Centra in namenjanje pozornosti hkratni uporabi več vrst drog, kot je hkratna uporaba dovoljenih in prepovedanih psihoaktivnih snovi.
These include the representation of Parliament on the Centre's Management Board and attention for multiple drug use, such as combined use of licit and illicit psychoactive substances.
Številni drugi predlogi Parlamenta niso bili upoštevani.
A number of other proposals by Parliament have not been incorporated.
Poročevalka podpira zahtevo po izboljšanju nepristranskosti in primerljivosti podatkov.
The rapporteur supports the call for more objective and comparable data.
Trenutno ni na razpolago dovolj podatkov iz nekaterih držav članic oz. niso ustrezno primerljivi, kar ovira splošno spremljanje evropskih razmer na področju drog.
At present, not enough data are available from certain Member States, or they are hardly comparable, which hampers general monitoring of the European drugs situation.
Zato poročevalka predlaga, da se določba iz stare uredbe ponovno vključi kot Uvodna izjava 9a (novo).
The rapporteur therefore proposes reinstating a provision from the old regulation as Recital 9a (new).
Poročevalka meni, da je za učinkovito zbiranje informacij potrebno izboljšati postopke sprejemanja odločitev, ki morajo potekati v preglednem organizacijskem okviru.
The rapporteur considers that, in order for information to be gathered efficiently, decision-making needs to be streamlined and to take place in a transparent organisational framework.
Zato podpira vključevanje določb o izvršnem odboru v Uredbo o Evropskem centru za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami, prav tako podpira redno ocenjevanje dela Centra in omrežja Reitox ter šestletna zunanja ocenjevanja: vse te spremembe bodo spodbudile učinkovitost in storilnost Centra.
She therefore supports the inclusion in the EMCDDA Regulation of provisions concerning the Executive Committee, and likewise endorses the regular evaluation of the Centre's work and of the Reitox network and the six-yearly external evaluations: all these changes will promote the efficiency and operation of the Centre.