natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prišlo je do vsesplošnega obžalovanja njegovega trenutnega nezadostnega financiranja, ki ga je povzročil sklep Sveta o finančni perspektivi 2007-2013, sprejet decembra 2005.
Its current underfunding, which is due to the Council decision of December 2005 on the Financial Perspective 2007-2013, was generally lamented.
Poglavitni vzroki za zavrnitev prostovoljne modulacije, ki so bili omenjeni v razpravi, so:
The main reasons for rejecting voluntary modulation which were stated in the debate were as follows:
· pomanjkanje vsakršne presoje vplivov, kljub očitnemu vplivu tega pravnega akta na kmete,
· the lack of any impact assessment, although the legal act would clearly have a substantial impact on farmers,
· nevarnost diskriminacije kmetov v EU, proti kateri predlog ne predvideva nobenih preventivnih ukrepov,
· the danger of discrimination against farmers within the EU, against which the proposal does not contain any precautions,
· ponovna neopazna nacionalizacija kmetijske politike,
· the renationalisation of agricultural policy through the back door,
· proračunski vidiki in vidiki strukturne politike predloga, ki zbujajo skrb (zlasti opustitev zahteve glede sofinanciranja),
· aspects of the proposal which call for criticism with reference to budgetary and structural policy (particularly the omission of a co-financing requirement),
· nevključitev Parlamenta v pripravo tako obsežnega načrta, in
· the failure to involve Parliament in the preparation of such a far-reaching proposal, and
· dejstvo, da predlog o prostovoljni modulaciji v veliki meri prejudicira rezultate t.i. kontrolnega pregleda leta 2008/2009 na področju kmetijstva, ne da bi Parlament v razpravah sodeloval kot enakovreden partner, kot je predvideno v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o finančni perspektivi,
· the fact that the proposal on voluntary modulation largely prejudges the outcome of the 'Health Check' in 2008/2009 for the field of agriculture without involving Parliament as an equal partner in the discussion process, as provided for in the Interinstitutional Agreement on the Financial Perspective.
Svet se do sedaj še na noben način ni odzval na pomisleke Parlamenta.
So far, the Council has not in any way responded to Parliament's concerns.
Po mnenju poročevalca tako še vedno obstajajo razlogi, ki so privedli do zavrnitve predloga na plenarnem zasedanju.
In the rapporteur's opinion, therefore, the grounds which led to the proposal's rejection in plenary remain valid.
Poročevalec glede na rezultat pogajanj meni, da bi morala Komisija v okviru kontrolnih pregledov predložiti nove predloge o financiranju 2. stebra, na podlagi obsežnih presoj vplivov ter intenzivnih in zgodnjih razprav z Evropskim parlamentom.
As a result of the consultations, the rapporteur considers that the Commission should, as part of the Health Check, submit fresh proposals on the financing of the second pillar, on the basis of comprehensive impact assessments and intensive and early discussions with the European Parliament.
V tem kontekstu se potem lahko razpravlja tudi o vprašanju nadaljnje stopnje obvezne modulacije.
In this connection, the question of a further compulsory modulation stage can then also be debated.
Mnenje o prvem poročilu
Opinion on the first report
Razlog zanj je bilo zmanjšanje sredstev za razvoj podeželja (okrog 69 milijard namesto 88 milijard eurov), o katerem je bil dosežen dogovor v Svetu pod pritiskom enega odstotka držav, zlasti Velike Britanije, ki naj bi jih deloma nadomestili s prostovoljno modulacijo.
The background was the cuts in rural development funding which were agreed in the Council at the insistence of the 1% States, particularly Britain (around € 69 billion instead of 88 bn), which were to be partially compensated by voluntary modulation.
Parlament je proti temu nemudoma izrazil pomembne zadržke (gl. izjavo 9 o Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju – v nadaljevanju MIS).
Parliament had immediately expressed strong reservations about this (see Declaration 9 on the Interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA)).
Predlog Komisije, ki ponekod odstopa od Sklepa Sveta, navaja naslednje pomembne točke:
The Commission proposal, which partially deviates from the Council decision, contains the following essential elements:
- za modulacijo ni nikakršnih mejnih pogojev, razen da so izvzeti mali prejemniki, ki prejemajo manj kot 5000 eurov neposrednih plačil;
- Modulation is not subject to any conditions, except that small recipients (i.e. those receiving less than € 5000 in direct payments) are exempt from it.
Parlament ne more potrditi predloga, ker
Parliament cannot agree to the proposal because:
- je ogroženo preživetje številnih kmetij,
- it jeopardises the survival of many farms,
- predlog izkrivlja konkurenco in povzroča diskriminacijo med kmeti v posameznih državah članicah, kar je v nasprotju s Pogodbo,
- it distorts competition and discriminates against farmers in individual Member States in a way which violates the Treaty,
Tako bi lahko spoštovali obljube, ki so jih kmetom dali predsedniki držav in vlad oktobra 2002, ne da bi pod vprašaj postavili skupno kmetijsko politiko, tj. politiko, o kateri se odloča skupaj na evropski ravni.
That would have made it possible to honour the pledges which the Heads of State and Government gave to farmers in October 2002 without calling into question the common agricultural policy, i.e. a policy decided jointly at European level.
Očitno ne bo prišlo do odprte obravnave predlogov Parlamenta iz Bögejevega poročila.
There will evidently not be any sincere consideration of the proposals made by Parliament in the Böge report.
Posamezni popravki za nazaj ne zadoščajo, veliko bolj je potrebna obširna preučitev preučiti vseh možnosti, na podlagi katerih bi lahko oblikovali koherentne in med seboj skladne predloge.
Individual retrospective improvements are not sufficient: rather, a comprehensive examination of all possible alternatives is needed, on the basis of which coherent and consistent measures could then be worked out.
V uredbi niso predvideni pogoji za izvajanje modulacije (delovna mesta, dohodkovna podpora na hektar idr.) niti v njej ni mehanizma, ki bi preprečil, da bi se konkurenčni položaj kmetov nesorazmerno poslabšal.
The regulation neither provides for any conditions (jobs, income support per hectare, etc.) for the implementation of modulation nor contains a procedure for ensuring that the competitive position of the farmers concerned will not deteriorate disproportionately.
Glede na opazne probleme financiranja v nekaterih državah članicah z obveznim sofinanciranjem ne bi zagotovili enotnega izvajanja prostovoljne modulacije, saj bi na odločitev bistveno vplivalo stanje nacionalnega proračuna, manj pa vprašanja dohodkov kmetov ali potrebe podeželja.
In view of the perceptible financing problems in some Member States (e.g. Portugal), compulsory co-financing would mean that there was no guarantee of uniform application of voluntary modulation, as the decision would strongly depend on the national budgetary situation, with rather less consideration for the income situation of farmers or the needs of rural areas.
To še enkrat jasno kaže, da je predlog slabo premišljen in na hitro narejen izdelek, ki ogroža celovitost politike razvoja podeželja in ga ni mogoče rešiti s posameznimi naknadnimi popravki.
This once again makes it clear that the proposal is an ill-considered, over-hasty piece of work, which jeopardises the coherence of rural development policy and cannot be rescued by retrofitting it with a few improvements.
Za zmanjšanja bi bila potrebna enostranska odločitev držav članic, prvi steber pa bi postal rudnik za nacionalne finančne interese.
Cuts would be a matter for unilateral decision by the Member States; the first pillar would become a resource to be mined to meet national financial needs.
Ni si mogoče zamisliti tako daljnosežne reforme brez temeljitega posvetovanja s Parlamentom in vpletenimi stranmi.
Such a far-reaching reform without extensive consultation with Parliament and the people who would be affected is inconceivable.
V okviru prostovoljne modulacije lahko države članice enostransko in brez vsestranskega sodelovanja Parlamenta v skladu s črko C MIS-a povečajo odhodke preko finančnega okvira iz Priloge I MIS-a za več milijard eurov.
Under voluntary modulation, the Member States could unilaterally and without the comprehensive involvement of Parliament in accordance with letter C of the IIA increase expenditure over and above the financial framework provided for in Annex I to the IIA by several billion euros.
Nasprotno, Parlament naj bi po postopku v skladu s členom 37 Pogodbe ES dal svoj blagoslov daljnosežnemu predlogu, ki ga je Svet sprejel na skrivaj.
Parliament is being expected to give its blessing under the procedure provided for in Article 37 of the EC Treaty to a far-reaching proposal adopted by the Council in virtual secrecy, hoping to catch people unawares.
Datum vrnitve zadeve odboru (člen 52(3))
Date referred back to committee under Rule 52(3)
Datum vrnitve zadeve odboru (člen 168)
Date referred back to committee under Rule 168
Rok za predložitev poročila
Deadline for reporting back
Poročevalec/-ka Datum imenovanja
Rapporteur Date confirmed/appointed
o predlogu spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 1/2007 za proračunsko leto 2007: dogovor, ki je rezultat trialoga z dne 28. novembra 2006 – strukturni skladi, Evropski sklad za ribištvo, Evropski investicijski sklad in Skupni raziskovalni center
on Draft amending budget No 1/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007: agreement resulting from the trialogue on 28 November 2006 - Structural Funds, European Fisheries Fund, European Investment Fund and Joint Research Centre
o predlogu spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 1/2007 za proračunsko leto 2007: dogovor, ki je rezultat trialoga z dne 28. novembra 2006 – strukturni skladi, Evropski sklad za ribištvo, Evropski investicijski sklad in Skupni raziskovalni center
on Draft amending budget No 1/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007: agreement resulting from the trialogue on 28 November 2006 - Structural Funds, European Fisheries Fund, European Investment Fund and Joint Research Centre, Section III – Commission
1. , zlasti členov 37 in 38 Uredbe,
1. , and in particular Articles 37 and 38 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007, ki je bil dokončno sprejet 14. decembra 2006,
– having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007, as finally adopted on 14 December 2006,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 1/2007 za proračunsko leto 2007, ki ga je Komisija predložila 20. decembra 2006 ( SEC(2006)1776 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 1/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007, which the Commission presented on 20 December 2006 ( SEC(2006)1776 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe proračuna št. 1/2007, ki ga je Svet pripravil ….
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 1/2007, which the Council established on ...
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0010/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0010/2007 ),
A. ker so potrebne tehnične prilagoditve, da bi lahko v proračunu Evropske unije za leto 2007 upoštevali in uresničili rezultat trialoga, ki se je odvijal 28. novembra,
A. whereas technical adjustments are necessary so as the outcome of the trialogue meeting on 28 November can be taken into account and implemented in the budget of the European Union for 2007,
B. ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 1/2007 uvesti te prilagoditve,
B. whereas the purpose of Draft amending budget No 1/2007 is to introduce those adjustments,
Namen predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna (PPSP) št. 1 za leto 2007 je vključiti v proračun 2007 potrebne tehnične prilagoditve iz pisnega predloga spremembe št. 2/2007, ki jih ni bilo mogoče upoštevati v zadnji fazi proračunskega postopka za leto 2007 in so bile sprejete med trialogom 28. novembra 2006.
The aim of Preliminary Draft Amending Budget (PDAB) No 1 for the year 2007 is to integrate into the budget 2007 the necessary technical adjustments needed from the Amending Letter No°2/2007, which could not be taken on board during the last phase of the 2007 budget procedure, as accepted during the trialogue of 28 November 2006.
Proračunski organ je na podlagi dogovora, sklenjenega med trialogom 28. novembra, iz pisnega predloga spremembe št. 2/2007 sprejel le postavke, ki zadevajo Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji in Hercule II.
On the basis of the agreement reached at the trialogue meeting of 28 November, the budgetary authority accepted from Amending Letter No 2/2007 only the items concerning the European Global Adjustment Fund (EGF) and Hercule II.
Poleg tega je EP dodeljena proračunska sredstva za Mednarodni sklad za Irsko že vključil v prvo obravnavo predloga proračuna 2007, Svet pa jih je sprejel v drugi obravnavi.
Moreover, the appropriations for the International Fund for Ireland were already included in the 1st reading of the 2007 draft budget by the EP and accepted in the Council's 2nd reading.
Med trialogom je bilo dogovorjeno, da bodo druge prilagoditve, potrebne za uresničitev sklenjenega dogovora, predložene v spremembi proračuna, zaradi njihove vključitve v proračun za leto 2007 pred objavo proračuna v Uradnem listu, ki je predvidena marca 2007.
It was agreed at the trialogue that other adjustments necessary to reflect the agreement achieved would be presented via an Amending Budget in view of their integration into the budget 2007 before its publication in the Official Journal foreseen for March 2007.
Ker so spremembe iz predloga spremembe proračuna dejansko tehnične ali rezultat zaključkov pogajanj, ki so potekala 28. novembra 2006, vaš poročevalec priporoča, da se predlog spremembe proračuna št. 1/2007 sprejme brez sprememb v eni sami obravnavi, saj bo dokončno sprejet do 1. februarja 2007.
As changes proposed in the Draft Amending Budget are indeed either technical or result from the conclusions of the negotiations of 28 November 2006, your rapporteur recommends to adopt the Draft amending budget No 1/2007 without amendments, in one single reading, in view of its final adoption by 1 February 2007.
Nekaj več informacij o spremembah je navedenih spodaj.
Some more information on the modifications is provided below.
Evropski investicijski sklad
European Investment Fund
Pripombe k proračunski vrstici (01 04 09 01), iz katere se bo financiral delež Skupnosti pri načrtovanem povečanju kapitala v Evropskem investicijskem skladu, so posodobljene; oblikuje se tudi nova vrstica prihodkov, ki bo omogočala, da se vsi prihodki iz dividend, ki jih izplača sklad, vrnejo v vrstico.
The remarks to budget line (01 04 09 01) which is to finance the Community participation to a planned capital increase of the European Investment Fund are updated and, also, a new revenue line is created which would allow any revenue arising from dividends paid by the Fund to be put back to the line.
Odobrena sredstva v vrstici se ne spremenijo (25 milijonov EUR v rezervi, sprejeti v proračunskem postopku).
There is no change to the appropriations on the line (EUR 25 million in reserve approved in the budget procedure).
Prihodki iz prispevkov Švicarske konfederacije
Revenue from the Swiss Confederation
Namen prilagoditev je upoštevati udeležbo Švicarske konfederacije v nekaterih programih Skupnosti, ki temeljijo na sklenjenem sporazumu.
The adjustments aim to take into account participation of the Swiss Confederation in some Community programmes based on the agreement concluded.
Zato se lahko sprejmejo kot tehnične.
They can therefore be accepted as technical.
Strukturni skladi in kohezijski sklad ter Evropski sklad za ribištvo
Structural and Cohesion Funds and the European Fisheries Fund
Prilagoditve spreminjajo porazdelitev celotnega zneska med posebne proračunske vrstice v skladu s sprejetimi pravnimi podlagami in zneski, predloženimi v spremembi proračuna št. 2.
Adjustments modify the distribution of the overall amount amongst particular budget lines, in line with the adopted legal bases and the figures presented in the Amending Letter no 2.
So proračunsko nevtralne, tako da splošni finančni okvir za razdelek 1b ostaja nespremenjen.
They are budget-neutral, so that the overall envelope for Heading 1b remains unchanged.
Spremembe zadevajo zlasti:
Modifications concern, in particular:
- prerazporeditev odobrenih sredstev v vrstico "Čezmejno sodelovanje – prispevek iz razdelka 1b" po sprejetju pravne podlage,
- transfer of appropriations to the line of 'Cross Border Cooperation - contribution from Heading 1b' following the adoption of the legal base,
- manj obsežna prerazporeditev sredstev med cilji Sklada za ribištvo v skladu s pravno podlago,
- a minor transfer of appropriations between objectives of the Fisheries Fund in line with the legal base,
- prilagoditev razporeditve proračunskih sredstev med različne vrstice ESRR in ESS ter prilagoditev razmerja med plačili in obveznostmi.
- adjusting the breakdown of appropriations amongst different lines of ERDF and ESF, as well as adjusting payments/commitments ratio.
Zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov – posodobitev pravne podlage
Health and Consumer Protection - update of legal base
Namen prilagoditev je upoštevati nove predloge v zvezi s pravno podlago ter razdeliti potrošniško politiko in zdravje v ločeni vrstici; vrstica za zdravje je bila uvedena na zahtevo Parlamenta.
The purpose of the adjustments is to take into account the new proposals for legal base and the split into separate lines for Consumer policy and Health therein, the latter one introduced at the request of the Parliament.
Platforma evropskih socialnih NVO – sprememba razdelka
Platform of European Social NGOs - change of heading
Namen predlagane spremembe je premakniti proračunsko vrstico 04 04 09 "Podpora za tekoče stroške Platforme evropskih socialnih NVO" iz razdelka 1a v razdelek 3b (Državljanstvo).
The purpose of the proposed change is to shift the budgetary line 04 04 09 "Support for the running costs of the Platform of European Social NGOs" from heading 1a into heading 3b (Citizenship).
Ta sprememba je v skladu z določbami nedavno sprejete pravne podlage.
This change is in line with the provisions of the recently adopted legal base.
Prilagoditve po posodobitvi računovodskega sistema
Adjustments following modernisation of the accounting system
Prilagoditve izhajajo iz posodobitve računovodskega sistema Komisije.
Those adjustments result from the modernisation of Commission's accounting system.
Evropski parlament je podobne prilagoditve že odobril, ko je sprejel spremembo proračuna št. 5/2006.
Similar adjustments have already been accepted by the European Parliament when it adopted the Amending Budget No 5/2006.
Spremembe vključujejo oblikovanje nove proračunske vrstice za Evropski razvojni sklad (prispevek k odhodkom za skupno upravno podporo).
Those changes include creating a new budget line for European Development Fund (contribution to common administrative support expenditure).
Skupni raziskovalni center – spremembe kadrovskega načrta
Joint Research Centre - changes to the establishment plan
Predlagane prilagoditve uvajajo nekatere spremembe v kadrovski načrt SRC.
Modifications proposed introduce some changes into the establishment plan of the JRC.
Niso popolnoma finančno nevtralne, vendar so še vedno v okviru rezerve, ki jo dopuščajo odobrena sredstva za leto 2007.
They are not completely financially neutral, but stay within the margin left by the appropriations for 2007.
Spremembe temeljijo na uveljavitvi istih meril za napredovanje za celotno osebje Komisije, ki je predmet različnih kadrovskih načrtov, in prilagoditvi kadrovskega načrta SRC, da bi upoštevali prag napredovanja, ki ga je Komisija načrtovala za proračunsko leto 2006.
The rationale for the changes is applying the same promotion criteria to the Commission's whole staff concerned by different establishment plans and adapting the establishment plan of the JRC to take into account the promotion threshold planned by the Commission for the exercise 2006.
Poleg tega se zahteva povečanje števila delovnih mest AD6 (in obenem zmanjšanje delovnih mest AD5), saj uslužbencev, ki jih je SRC hotel zaposliti po natečaju za AD5/AD6, ni bilo mogoče zaposliti na stopnji AD5 zaradi visokih kvalifikacij, ki se pričakujejo od uslužbencev SRC (doktorat, podiplomske izkušnje in izkušnje iz raziskovanja).
Moreover, an increase in the number of AD6 posts (accompanied by reduction of AD5 posts) is requested, as the staff that the JRC wanted to recruit following an AD5/AD6 competition could not be recruited at an AD5 level because of the high qualifications expected from the staff of the JRC (PHD, postgraduate and research experience).
Razdelek 4
Heading 4
Predlagane spremembe v zvezi z razdelkom 4 se lahko povzamejo takole:
The changes proposed concerning heading 4 can be summarised as follows:
a) Uvedba sklicevanj na sprejete pravne podlage in prilagoditev naslovov proračunskih vrstic, da ustrezajo končni sprejeti pravni strukturi.
a) Introduction of the references to the adopted legal bases and adjustment of the budget line titles to correspond to the final legal structure adopted.
b) Združitev vrstic za demokracijo in človekove pravice v dve glavni vrstici: vrstico za Evropsko pobudo za demokracijo in človekove pravice (19 04 01) in vrstico za spremljanje volitev (19 04 02).
b) Consolidation of the democracy and human rights lines into two main lines: one for the EIDHR as such (19 04 01), and one separate line for election observation (19 04 02).
Zahteva Parlamenta za dogovor o omejitvi opazovanja volitev na največ 25% celotnega programa je pregledna.
In this way the Parliament's demand that the agreement to limit election observation to a maximum of 25% of the overall programme is transparent.
Poleg tega je Komisija sprejela nov referenčni akt (pripombo) v vrstici za volitve, ki bo dodatno odražal to dejstvo.
In addition, a new reference act (remark) to the election line has also been agreed by the Commission to further reflect this fact.
c) Oblikovanje nove vrstice z naslovom "ukrepi civilne zaščite v tretjih državah" (19 06 05), ker takšnih ukrepov ne bo kril instrument za stabilnost, ampak pravna podlaga Finančnega instrumenta za civilno zaščito.
c) Creation of a new line entitled "civil protection interventions in third countries" (19 06 05) given that such actions will not be covered by the stability instrument but, instead, by the legal base on a Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
Vrstici bo dodeljenih 5 milijonov EUR, kompenziranih z -4 milijoni za "Ukrepe na področju preprečevanja širjenja orožja za množično uničevanje" (19 06 02 01) in -1 milijonom za "Medregionalne ukrepe na področju organiziranega kriminala….itd." (19 06 03), kar pomeni v okviru istega poglavja.
The line would be endowed with EUR 5 million, compensated for by - 4 million for "Actions in the area of non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction" (19 06 02 01) and -1 million for "Trans-regional actions in the areas of organised crime.....etc" (19 06 03), i.e. all within the same chapter.
d) Za tako imenovane "tematske ukrepe" – varnost hrane, NVO, okolje, človekov in socialni razvoj itd., bo sprememba proračuna 1 ukinila ločene vrstice, prvotno predvidene za ukrepe v okviru instrumenta za razvoj na eni strani in instrumenta za sosedstvo na drugi strani.
d) For the so called "thematic actions", i.e. food security, NGOs, environment, human and social development etc, the AB1 will do away with the separate lines originally foreseen for interventions under the development instrument, on the one hand, and the neighbourhood instrument, on the other hand.
Namesto tega se predlaga ena sama vrstica za vsak ukrep, ker bo te ukrepe zdaj kril instrument za razvoj.
Instead, as legally these actions will now all be covered by the development instrument, one single line per action is proposed.