natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zgoraj opisani pogoji bi sestavljali idealno ozadje za skupno strategijo o vračanju nezakonitih priseljencev.
The conditions described above would form the ideal background for a joint strategy for the return of illegal immigrants.
Zunanji ministri in ministri, ki so odgovorni za priseljevanje, se bodo morali redno sestajati z EP in Komisijo, da bi določili okvir takšne strategije in nadzirali njeno izvajanje.
The Foreign Ministers and the Ministers responsible for immigration will need to hold frequent meetings with Parliament and the Commission in order to determine the broad lines of such a strategy and also scrutinise its implementation.
Priseljevanje in sodelovanje pri upravljanju zunanjih meja sta lakmusov test uspešnosti odnosov EU s svojimi sosedami.
Immigration matters and cooperation in external border management are an acid test of the success of the EU’s relations with its neighbours.
Pomanjkljiva politika vračanja v situaciji, kjer evropske politične elite ne sprejemajo svoje polne odgovornosti, v luči vrednot EU ne more biti upravičena.
An unsoundly based return policy in a situation in which the European political establishment is failing to assume its full responsibilities cannot be justified in the light of Union values.
Jasno je, da vračanje pomeni akutno krizo.
It is manifestly obvious that returning entails an acute crisis.
EU mora zagotoviti, da države članice in Rusija v postopku vračanja spoštujejo temeljne pravice vpletenih oseb, zlasti pravice, ki so najbolj izpostavljene v tistih socialnih razredih, kjer je prisotno izseljevanje: to so nediskriminacija, fizična in psihološka nedotakljivost, zaščita družin, primerni pogoji, ko so ljudje pridržani ali ko so v postopku tranzita, ter nujna varovala glede pravice do obrambe.
The Union must ensure that in the return procedure the Member States and Russia respect the basic rights of the persons involved, especially the rights most to the fore in the walks of life in which migration occurs, namely non-discrimination, physical and psychological inviolability, protection of families, decent conditions when people are held in detention or going through the transit procedure, and essential safeguards regarding the right to be defended.
Ta morajo oblikovati obvezno osnovo, na podlagi katere se oceni, ali pogodbenice upoštevajo sporazum in delujejo v dobri veri.
These must form the mandatory basis on which to assess whether the contracting parties are complying with the agreement and acting in good faith.
i) Kako bosta Komisija in Svet zagotovila, da se v primeru vračanja, zlasti množičnega vračanja, te pravice spoštujejo?
i) How will the Commission and Council ensure that the above rights are respected in the event of repatriation and especially repatriation on a mass scale?
ii) Kakšne skupne nadzorne mehanizme nameravata vzpostaviti skupaj z Rusijo?
ii) What joint supervisory arrangements do they intend to set up with Russia?
iii) Katera merila bodo uporabljena pri ugotavljanju, ali država, v katero se priseljenci vračajo, zagotavlja pravičnost svojega sodnega sistema in demokracijo v svojem političnem sistemu?
iii) What criteria will be applied in order to ascertain that the country to which immigrants are returning offers guarantees of justice in its judicial system and of democracy in its political system?
iv) Kako bo poskrbljeno za posredovanje informacij o namembnih državah za osebe brez državljanstva?
iv) What arrangements will be made for sharing information about countries of destination for stateless persons?
Ali pa so takšne države, za namene sporazuma, neznanka?
Or are such countries, for the purposes of the agreement, a blank space?
Pravice morajo biti torej zagotovljene v celotnem postopku.
Rights must thus be guaranteed throughout the entire procedure.
Zaradi besedila sporazuma se porajajo nekatera vprašanja.
The text of the agreement prompts several questions.
Kar zadeva prosilce za azil
As regards asylum-seekers
Besedilo sporazuma izrecno ne izključuje prosilcev za azil.
The text of the agreement does not explicitly exclude asylum-seekers.
Tako bi lahko prišlo do ponovnega sprejema prosilcev za azil, katerih prošnje še niso bile obravnavane ali so bile zavrnjene oziroma ocenjene kot nesprejemljive zaradi uveljavljanja načela "varne tretje države".
It could consequently lead to the readmission of asylum-seekers whose applications had not yet been considered on their merits or had been rejected or deemed inadmissible as a result of applying the ‘safe third country’ concept.
Parlament poziva Komisijo, naj to vprašanje zastavi v skupnem odboru za ponovni sprejem in pozove k varovalom, da bi prosilcem za azil lahko nudili takšen postopek za pridobitev azila, ki bi spoštoval njihov status po mednarodnem pravu, vključujoč tudi načelo nevračanja ( ‘non-refoulement’ ).
Parliament is asking the Commission to raise this matter in the Joint Readmission Committee and call for safeguards to enable asylum-seekers to benefit from an asylum procedure respecting their status in international law, extending also to the principle of non-return ( ‘non-refoulement’ ).
Treba je zagotoviti, da specifična mednarodna zaščita, ki je določena za osebe, ki jim je dodeljen azil, in za begunce, ne bo izginila.
What needs to be guaranteed is that the specific international protection accorded to persons granted asylum and refugees will not be eroded.
Kar zadeva državljane tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva
As regards third-country nationals and stateless persons
i) Kako bodo pridobljeni podatki o spoštovanju človekovih pravic v namembnih državah za državljane tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva?
i) How will information be obtained about the state of human rights in the countries of destination for third-country nationals and stateless persons?
ii) Status osebe brez državljanstva, kot je opredeljen v konvenciji Združenih narodov iz leta 1954, bi moral biti izrecno omenjen v seznamu iz člena 18.
ii) The status of stateless persons as defined in the 1954 United Nations Convention should be expressly mentioned in the list in Article 18.
Res je, da seznam ni izčrpen.
Admittedly, the list is not exhaustive.
Vseeno pa bi izrecna omemba statusa osebe brez državljanstva pojasnila situacijo za upravne organe.
But an explicit reference to stateless person status would serve to educate the administrative authorities.
Ker pooblastila skupnega odbora za ponovni sprejem (člen 19) ne vključujejo nadzora spoštovanja človekovih pravic, so popolnoma neustrezna in nezadostna.
Because they do not extend to monitoring human rights, the powers of the Joint Readmission Committee (Article 19) are visibly wanting and intrinsically skewed.
Sporazum, ki zadeva osebe, se že po definiciji ne more obravnavati kot zgolj tehničen sporazum.
An agreement relating to persons cannot, by definition, be treated as a purely technical agreement.
Parlament tako priporoča, da se pristojnosti skupnega odbora za ponovni sprejem razširijo na pristojnost nadzora spoštovanja človekovih pravic na vseh stopnjah ponovnega sprejema.
Parliament is thus recommending that the powers of the Joint Readmission Committee include a power to monitor human rights at every stage of readmission.
Pospešeni postopek (člen 6(3)) vsiljuje zaskrbljujočo in nepreklicno domnevo glede neurejenega statusa zajetih oseb.
The accelerated procedure (Article 6(3)) suggests a disturbing irreversible presumption regarding the irregular status of the persons covered.
Kje so opredeljena varovala, ki jih zagotavlja pravica do obrambe?
What provision is made here for the safeguards afforded by the right to be defended?
Kako se lahko postopek v praksi uskladi s specifičnim statusom prosilcev za azil v mednarodnem pravu?
How can the procedure be reconciled in practice with the specific status of asylum-seekers in international law?
Kar zadeva dovoljenje za tranzit : varovala za zaščito otrok, družinske enotnosti, ter fizične in psihične nedotakljivosti nezakonitih priseljencev, ter osnovna varovala glede pravice do obrambe, niso vključena v seznam varoval iz člena 14 .
As regards transit authorisation : safeguards to protect children, family unity, and the physical and psychological inviolability of illegal immigrants, and the essential safeguards regarding the right to be defended, are not included in the list of safeguards in Article 14 .
Zgoraj omenjena varovala sestavljajo neizogibno srčiko načela človečnosti, ki ga je treba upoštevati, če naj bo sporazum veljaven ne samo s stališča vrednot EU, marveč tudi s stališča nenapisanih načel mednarodnega prava.
The above safeguards, however, constitute the indispensable core of a principle of humanity that has to be observed if the agreement is to be valid in the light not only of Union values, but also of the unwritten principles of international law.
V sporazumu o ponovnem sprejemu ni vidika usklajenosti z načelom prostovoljnega vračanja .
The possibility of establishing a complementary relationship to the principle of voluntary return does not exist in the readmission agreement.
V skladu s tem vidikom je treba dati nezakonitemu priseljencu kot prvo alternativo prisilnemu vračanju na voljo določeno obdobje za prostovoljni odhod.
According to this possibility, an illegal immigrant must be allowed a set period in which to leave voluntarily, as a first alternative to his forced return.
Potreba po klavzuli o človekovih pravicah : v nasprotju z najnovejšim stališčem Parlamenta o pogajanjih in sklepanju mednarodnih sporazumov s državami nečlanicami sporazum o ponovnem vračanju z Rusijo ne vsebuje vzajemne "klavzule o demokratičnosti in spoštovanju človekovih pravic", katere kršitev bi lahko privedla do odložitve izvajanja sporazuma ali celo do njegove odpovedi.
Need for a human rights clause : contrary to the views expressed most recently by Parliament on the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements with non-member countries, the readmission agreement with Russia does not contain a reciprocal ‘human rights and democracy clause’, which, if breached, could lead to suspension or even termination of the agreement.
Parlament je v odstavku 8 svoje resolucije o klavzuli o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v sporazumih Evropske unije ( 2005/2057(INI) ) pozval k "razširitvi klavzule o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji na vse nove sporazume med Evropsko unijo in tretjimi državami, tako industrijskimi kot v razvoju, vključno s sektorskimi sporazumi, trgovino in tehnično ali finančno pomočjo, kakor je bilo to izpeljano z državami AKP".
In paragraph 8 of its resolution on the human rights and democracy clause in European Union agreements ( 2005/2057(INI) ) Parliament called for ‘the human rights and democracy clause to be extended to all new agreements between the European Union and third countries, both industrialised and developing, and including sectoral agreements, trade and technical or financial aid, along the lines of what has been done with the ACP States’.
Parlament sedaj poziva Komisijo in Svet k temeljiti presoji izvajanja sporazumov, ki se sklepajo glede ponovnega sprejema nezakonitih priseljencev, to presojo pa naj utemeljita na človekovih pravicah.
Parliament is calling now on the Commission and Council to bring thorough assessment to bear on the implementation of the agreements being concluded with a view to the readmission of illegal immigrants, basing such assessment on human rights.
Dejanski problem sporazuma o ponovnem sprejemu med EU in Rusijo je vprašanje, ali bo varstvo človekovih pravic v njem zasedlo osrednje mesto ali pa bo s sumarnim pristopom do vračanja, po katerem ima varnostni vidik prednost pred humanitarnim vidikom, odrinjeno na drugo mesto.
The real problem with the EU-Russia readmission agreement lies in the question whether protection of human rights is to occupy a central place or be relegated to second place by a summary approach to return in which the security aspect takes precedence over the humanitarian aspect.
Ne smejo dovoliti, da bi obremenjenost s statistiko zmanjšala osredotočenost na posamezne človekove pravice.
They must not allow the preoccupation with figures to water down the focus on individual human rights.
Za zaskrbljenost je dovolj že en sam primer kršenja človekovih pravic.
Even one human rights violation is enough to give us cause for anxiety.
Pragmatični vidik sporazuma ne sme zasenčiti njegovega moralnega vidika.
In the agreement, the pragmatic dimension must not eclipse the moral dimension.
Obseg odnosov med Unijo in Rusijo se stalno širi.
Relations between the Union and Russia are expanding constantly.
Resnični uspeh teh odnosov predpostavlja premik z zgolj tehničnega področja na področje vrednot.
If they are to be considered a genuine success, they must move beyond the purely technical sphere into the sphere of values.
Le na ta način bo lahko dosežen cilj o širši Evropi, ki bo upošteval temeljne vrednote in bo lahko pustil pečat v svetu.
Only in that way shall we achieve the aim of a wider Europe, conscious of fundamental values and able to make its mark on the world.
Na tej podlagi torej Parlament daje svojo privolitev k sporazumu.
It is on the basis of these considerations that Parliament is giving its assent to the agreement.
Za merjenje legitimnosti predloga obstaja ena sama mera: človekovo dostojanstvo, ki je izvor in cilj politik Unije.
There is only one yardstick for gauging the legitimacy of the agreement: sublime human dignity, the starting point and the ultimate goal of Union policies.
Izraža zadovoljstvo nad dejstvom, da sporazum jasno določa obveznosti in postopke, ki jih morajo Ruska federacija in države članice izpolnjevati pri ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki v državi bivajo nezakonito.
He is pleased that the Agreement establishes clear obligations and procedures for the authorities of the Russian Federation and the Member States regarding the readmission of illegal residents.
Meni, da sta ratifikacija sporazuma s strani Ruske federacije in odločna zavezanost k njegovi izvedbi predpogoja za uzakonitev sporazuma o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov.
He considers that the ratification of the Agreement by the Russian Federation and a strong commitment to its implementation should be prerequisites to the enactment of the visa facilitation agreement.
Nadalje poudarja, da je treba za začetek veljavnosti sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu in o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov izpolniti vse z njima povezane pogoje.
He stresses also that all necessary requirements connected to the Agreements on readmission and visa facilitation need to be fulfilled before the Agreements can enter into force.
Pri tem od Rusije pričakuje odločno zavezanost podpisu in izvajanju dodatnega protokola s Francijo, Portugalsko in Španijo o rokih za pridrževanje nezakonitih priseljencev.
In this regard, he expects a firm commitment from Russia to sign and implement an additional protocol with France, Portugal and Spain regarding the time limit applicable to the detention of illegal immigrants.
Izraža zahtevo, da Komisija in Svet Evropski parlament obveščata o izpolnjevanju omenjenega pogoja.
He insists that the Commission and the Council should inform the European Parliament of the fulfilment of this condition.
Ugotavlja potrebo po izboljšanju upravljavskih sposobnosti Ruske federacije na področju priseljevanja, da bo ta država sposobna izpolnjevati obveznosti iz sporazuma o ponovnem sprejemu takoj po začetku njegove veljavnosti.
He sees the need for the enhancement of the capacity of the Russian Federation in migration management in order for its authorities to be able to meet the responsibilities under the readmission agreement as of its entering into force.
Pripravljavec mnenja želi izraziti zaskrbljenost nad dejstvom, da ni regulatornega okvira za izvajanje sporazuma, zato meni, da bi morala Komisija ruskim oblastem pomagati z nudenjem potrebnega znanja in izkušenj, da bo država zmožna izpolnjevati obveznosti v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi.
Your draftsperson is concerned about the absence of a regulatory framework for implementing the Agreement and considers, therefore, that the Commission should seek to provide the Russian authorities with the necessary expertise in order for the country to be in a position to meet its obligations according to the international standards.
Pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Ruska federacija s svojimi sosedami začela pogovore in pogajanja o vračanju in ponovnem sprejemu, da bi lahko pred iztekom triletnega prehodnega obdobja od začetka veljavnosti sporazuma začela izpolnjevati njegove obveznosti v zvezi s ponovnim sprejemom državljanov tretjih držav in oseb brez državljanstva.
He welcomes the fact that the Russian Federation has started dialogue and negotiations with its neighbours on return and readmission in order to be in a position to implement this Agreement regarding the obligation to readmit third-country nationals and stateless persons by the end of a 3-year transition period after its entering into force.
Strokovna podkovanost Komisije pri pogajanjih o tovrstnih sporazumih bi tudi v tem primeru lahko pomenila neprecenljivo pomoč.
The Commission's expertise on negotiating such agreements could serve as an invaluable input in this case as well.
A poleg vsega navedenega želi pripravljavec mnenja izraziti zaskrbljenost nad dejstvom, da sporazum izrecno ne izključuje prosilcev za azil in lahko tako zajema ponovni sprejem prosilcev za azil, katerih prošnje še niso bilo ocenjene individualno ali so bile zavrnjene oziroma ocenjene kot nesprejemljive v skladu z načelom „varne tretje države”.
Finally, your draftsperson is concerned that the Agreement does not explicitly exclude asylum-seekers from the scope of the Agreement and may, therefore, involve the readmission of asylum-seekers whose claims have not yet been determined on their merits, or whose claims have been rejected or deemed inadmissible pursuant to the application of the "safe third country" concept.
Zaradi tega meni, da bi morala Komisija to vprašanje izpostaviti v skupnem odboru za ponovni sprejem in pozvati k sprejetju zaščitnih ukrepov, ki bodo prosilcem za azil zagotovili dostop do poštenih in učinkovitih azilnih postopkov, pri katerih se bi med drugim spoštovalo načelo nevračanja.
Therefore, he insists that the Commission should raise this matter in the joint readmission committee and call for safeguards to ensure that asylum-seekers have access to a fair and effective asylum procedure, inter alia to ensure respect for the principle of non-refoulement .
Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, naj predlaga odobritev predloga Komisije.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose approval of the Commission proposal.
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Rusko federacijo o ponovnem sprejemu
Proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on readmission
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Rusko federacijo o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov za kratkoročno bivanje
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visas
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................10
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2006)0188 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0188 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 62(2)(b)(i) in (ii) ter prvega stavka prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 62(2)(b)(i) and (ii) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0169/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0169/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0029/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0029/2007 ),
Sporazum: zgodovina in razlogi
The Agreement: history and reasoning
Odločitev glede sklenitve sporazuma ES-Rusija o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov za kratkoročno bivanje je bila sprejeta na vrhu v Sankt Petersburgu maja leta 2003, ko sta se Rusija in EU zavzeli tudi za preučitev pogojev, ki bi dolgoročno omogočili potovanje brez vizumov.
The conclusion of the EC-Russia Agreement to facilitate short-stay visas was decided at the St Petersburg Summit in May 2003, when Russia and the EU also undertook to examine the conditions for visa-free travel as a long-term perspective.
Na tem vrhu sta obe strani izrazili namero o okrepitvi medsebojnih odnosov z vzpostavitvijo štirih "skupnih območij", vključno s skupnim območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice.
At the summit, both parties expressed the resolve to strengthen mutual relations on the basis of the creation of four ‘common spaces’, including a common space of freedom, security and justice.
Pogajanja z Rusko federacijo o poenostavitvi vizumskega postopka so se začela 20. in 21. oktobra 2004 v Bruslju.
Negotiations with the Russian Federation on visa facilitation were opened in Brussels on 20 and 21 October 2004.
Odvijala so se vzporedno s pogajanji o sporazumu o ponovnem sprejemu nezakonitih priseljencev, ki potekajo od januarja 2003.
The negotiations were conducted in parallel with the negotiations on the agreement on the readmission of illegal immigrants, which had been underway since January 2003.
Sklenitev sporazumov o vizumih in ponovnem sprejemu je nedvomno eden redkih korakov naprej na poti k vzpostavitvi tega skupnega območja.
The conclusion of the two agreements on visas and readmission certainly represents one of the few steps forward which have so far been made towards achieving this common space.
Besedilo obeh sporazumov je bilo v celoti formalno parafirano 4. aprila 2006 v Moskvi.
The complete text of the two agreements was formally initialled in Moscow on 4 April 2006.
Ker sta sporazuma o poenostavitvi vizumskega postopka in ponovnem sprejemu povezana, bi ju bilo treba podpisati in skleniti hkrati, pa tudi veljati bi morala začeti hkrati.
Since the agreement on visa facilitation and the agreement on readmission are linked, both agreements should be signed, concluded and enter into force simultaneously.
Sporazuma sta primer pristopa, ki temelji na vzajemni politični izmenjavi.
The agreements demonstrate an approach based on reciprocal political compensation.
EU je do sedaj pogajanja za poenostavitev izdajanja vizumov začela z Rusijo, Ukrajino, Marokom in Kitajsko.
So far, the EU has opened negotiations aimed at easing the arrangements for the issuance of visas with Russia, Ukraine, Morocco and China.
Svet je 15. novembra 2006 določil mandate za začetek pogajanj z državami Zahodnega Balkana (Makedonijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Črno goro in Srbijo), ki naj bi se zaključila do junija 2007.
On 15 November 2006 the Council laid down the mandates for the opening of negotiations with the countries of the Western Balkans (Macedonia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia), which are due to be concluded by June 2007.
Odnosi med Evropsko unijo in Rusijo so v ključnem obdobju.
Relations between the European Union and Russia are passing through a crucial phase.
Oblikovanje novega sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju po letu 2007 spremlja zaskrbljenost glede spoštovanja človekovih pravic v Rusiji.
The emergence of a new Partnership and Cooperation Agreement after 2007 is coupled with concern at the state of human rights in Russia.
Sedanji in ne preveč ambiciozni sporazum o poenostavitvi vizumskega postopka dokazuje, da so ti odnosi predvsem pragmatični.
The present - not very ambitious - agreement on the facilitation of visas is an example of the essentially pragmatic way in which these relations are unfolding.