natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the purpose of the proposal is to ensure that the same control measures are applied to the low pathogenic visas as to the highly pathogenic one, there is no reason for differential co-financing.
Since the purpose of the proposal is to ensure that the same control measures are applied to the low pathogenic virus as to the highly pathogenic one, there is no reason for differential co-financing.
Furthermore, there is a risk that the low pathogenic virus will mutate into the highly pathogenic one.
Furthermore, there is a risk that the low pathogenic virus will mutate into the highly pathogenic one.
Člen 3 a, odstavek 3, alinea 2 a (novo) (Odločba 90/424/EGS)
Article 3 a, paragraph 3, indent 2 a (new) (Decision 90/424/EEC)
- 100 % stroškov cepljenja.
- 100% of vaccination costs.
Člen 3a, odstavek 3a (novo) (Sklep 90/424/EGS)
Article 3 a, paragraph 3 a (new) (Decision 90/424/EEC)
The purpose of this proposal is to extend the scope of Community action to include cooperation and technical support in respect of third countries (in particular Asian ones), in view of the need for effective prevention and screening in the countries in which avian influenza originates.
The purpose of this proposal is to extend the scope of Community action to include cooperation and technical support in respect of third countries (in particular Asian ones), in view of the need for effective prevention and screening in the countries in which avian influenza originates.
The purpose of this proposal is to update the current rules relating to the Community's share of the cost of implementing the veterinary measures laid down in Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990, bearing in mind the serious cases of avian influenza which have recently occurred in various EU countries (in particular Italy and the Netherlands) and the serious threat which they pose to public health.
The purpose of this proposal is to update the current rules relating to the Community's share of the cost of implementing the veterinary measures laid down in Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990, bearing in mind the serious cases of avian influenza which have recently occurred in various EU countries (in particular Italy and the Netherlands) and the serious threat which they pose to public health.
It should be noted that the proposal accompanies the proposal for a Council Directive 2005/062 on Community measures to combat avian influenza.
It should be noted that the proposal accompanies the proposal for a Council Directive 2005/062 on Community measures to combat avian influenza.
The amendments contained in the Commission proposal relate exclusively to the financing of veterinary measures designed to combat avian influenza.
The amendments contained in the Commission proposal relate exclusively to the financing of veterinary measures designed to combat avian influenza.
The scope of those measures is extended to include weakly pathogenic viruses, in view of their tremendous ability to mutate and the ease with which they become highly pathogenic (thereby posing a threat to public health).
The scope of those measures is extended to include weakly pathogenic viruses, in view of their tremendous ability to mutate and the ease with which they become highly pathogenic (thereby posing a threat to public health).
The Commission has since announced that in 2007 it is hoping to review the entire animal-health situation.
The Commission has since announced that in 2007 it is hoping to review the entire animal-health situation.
Avian influenza (which is also known as bird 'flu and which can affect pigs as well) engenders high costs whenever there is a large-scale outbreak.
Avian influenza (which is also known as bird 'flu and which can affect pigs as well) engenders high costs whenever there is a large-scale outbreak.
The following facts concerning the most recent avian-influenza epizootics may be noted:
The following facts concerning the most recent avian-influenza epizootics may be noted:
17 million birds died or were slaughtered - USD 350 million
17 million birds died or were slaughtered - USD 350 million
14 million birds died or were slaughtered - EUR 200 million
14 million birds died or were slaughtered - EUR 200 million
30 million birds died or were slaughtered - EUR 750 million
30 million birds died or were slaughtered - EUR 750 million
Avian influenza occurs worldwide and it affects most domesticated birds (in particular turkeys, hens, guinea fowl, quails, pheasants, ducks and geese), and also wild species.
Avian influenza occurs worldwide and it affects most domesticated birds (in particular turkeys, hens, guinea fowl, quails, pheasants, ducks and geese), and also wild species.
The distribution of the disease is influenced by the relationship between domesticated birds and wild birds, the location of poultry farms, the routes taken by migratory birds and the time of year.
The distribution of the disease is influenced by the relationship between domesticated birds and wild birds, the location of poultry farms, the routes taken by migratory birds and the time of year.
Infection mainly occurs via the faeces, either directly (through contact between infected birds) or indirectly (through contact with anything that may have been exposed to faecal contamination).
Infection mainly occurs via the faeces, either directly (through contact between infected birds) or indirectly (through contact with anything that may have been exposed to faecal contamination).
The incubation period varies greatly from one case to another and may range from three to fourteen days.
The incubation period varies greatly from one case to another and may range from three to fourteen days.
Although it is rare for human beings to be infected, there have nonetheless been outbreaks amongst the human population in recent years.
Although it is rare for human beings to be infected, there have nonetheless been outbreaks amongst the human population in recent years.
These are caused by certain avian-influenza viruses and in 2003 they affected 89 people in the Netherlands (one of whom died), whilst in recent years there have been dozens of cases (and a number of deaths) in Asia.
These are caused by certain avian-influenza viruses and in 2003 they affected 89 people in the Netherlands (one of whom died), whilst in recent years there have been dozens of cases (and a number of deaths) in Asia.
Prevention is, therefore, of the utmost importance.
Prevention is, therefore, of the utmost importance.
This involves in particular the development of a screening/monitoring system for the disease (to incude laboratory diagnosis) and also research in order to produce a vaccine which is suitable for the various strains of the disease and which can be used in order to prevent major epidemics from spreading.
This involves in particular the development of a screening/monitoring system for the disease (to include laboratory diagnosis) and also research in order to produce a vaccine which is suitable for the various strains of the disease and which can be used in order to prevent major epidemics from spreading.
The aid to be made available to breeders should also cover loss of income whilst a new farm is being set up.
The aid to be made available to breeders should also cover loss of income whilst a new farm is being set up.
The Community's share of the funding should also be increased in view of the fact that this is a case in which the Member States can be easily affected on account of their location on wild birds' migration routes.
The Community's share of the funding should also be increased in view of the fact that this is a case in which the Member States can be easily affected on account of their location on wild birds' migration routes.
Utmost attention must be paid to the problem in order to prevent it from spreading, since any large-scale outbreak of the disease would entail much higher costs.
Utmost attention must be paid to the problem in order to prevent it from spreading, since any large-scale outbreak of the disease would entail much higher costs.
This accounts for the proposed amendments to Council Decision 2005/0063 laid down in document COM(2005)0171 .
This accounts for the proposed amendments to Council Decision 2005/0063 laid down in document COM(2005)0171 .
MNENJE ODBORA ZA OKOLJE, JAVNO ZDRAVJE IN VARNOST HRANE
OPINIONOF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY
AI se pojavlja po vsem svetu, prvič pa so jo prepoznali v Italiji pred več kot 100 leti.
First identified in Italy more than 100 years ago, AI occurs worldwide.
Za AI naj bi bile dovzetne vse ptice, čeprav se pri nekaterih vrstah okužba pojavi prej kot pri drugih.
All birds are thought to be susceptible to AI, though some species are more vulnerable to infection than others.
AI se lahko razširi tudi na sesalce, vključno z ljudmi, kar navadno sledi neposrednemu stiku z okuženimi pticami.
AI can also be spread to mammals, including humans, usually following direct contact with infected birds.
Med še vedno trajajočo epidemijo AI v nekaterih območjih v Aziji je bila smrtnost zaradi te bolezni pri ljudeh zelo visoka.
During the ongoing AI epidemic in some parts of Asia the fatality rate among humans has been very high.
Pojav AI pri pticah povzroča širok spekter simptomov, od blažje oblike obolenja do zelo agresivne in smrtonosne bolezni, ki lahko pripelje do hudih epidemij.
The occurrence of AI in birds causes a wide spectrum of symptoms, ranging from mild illness to a highly aggressive, fatal disease that can lead to severe epidemics.
"Nizko patogena aviarna influenca" (LPAI) ni nevarna.
'Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza' (LPAI) is not dangerous.
Ptice z LPAI se lahko jé in ne prenašajo bolezni.
Birds with LPAI are safe to eat and not contagious.
Na drugi strani "visoko patogeno aviarno influenco" (HPAI) zaznamuje huda obolelost in hitra smrt, pri čemer stopnja smrtnosti lahko doseže 90%.
On the other hand 'highly pathogenic avian influenza' (HPAI) is characterized by severe illness and rapid death, with a mortality rate that can reach 90%.
Morebitna nevarnost LPAI, ki so jo poudarile nedavne raziskave, je v tem, da lahko nizko patogeni virusi mutirajo v visoko patogene viruse po tem, ko kratek čas krožijo med populacijo perutnine.
The potential danger of LPAI, highlighted by r ecent research, shows that viruses of low pathogenicity can, after circulation for short periods in a poultry population, mutate into highly pathogenic viruses.
Torej bi lahko sklepali, da je razširjenost LPAI med domačo perutnino pomemben dejavnik pri mutiranju virusa v HPAI, ki potem povzroča uničujoče izbruhe.
This would suggest that the spread of LPAI in domestic poultry, therefore, is a major factor for the mutation of the virus into HPAI, which then causes devastating outbreaks.
Komisija se je na to odzvala s predlogom revizije in dopolnitve obstoječe zakonodaje Skupnosti.
The Commission has reacted to this by proposing to revise and update existing Community legislation.
Komisija najprej podaja predlog direktive, ki vpeljuje ukrepe za nadzor tako HPAI kot LPAI.
First of all, the Commission puts forward a proposal for a directive that introduces control measures for both HPAI and LPAI.
Odpravila bi direktivo 92/40/EGS, ki določa obvezne ukrepe za nadzor bolezni samo v primerih bolezni perutnine zaradi HPAI.
It would repeal Directive 92/40/EEC, which establishes compulsory disease control measures only in case of disease in poultry caused by HPAI.
Hkrati se predlaga sprejetje predlogov sprememb Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS, da bi se zagotovile ustrezne finančne določbe za nov paket ukrepov za nadzor.
To ensure adequate financial provisions for the new package of control measures, it is proposed that Council Decision 90/424/EEC should be amended in parallel.
Odločba Sveta 90/424/EGS predvideva finančno pomoč Skupnosti državam članicam za izkoreninjenje določenih živalskih bolezni.
Council Decision 90/424/EEC provides financial assistance from the Community to Member States for the eradication of certain animal diseases.
Ta pomoč je trenutno predvidena le za HPAI in ne za LPAI.
Currently this assistance is only available for HPAI and not LPAI.
Odbor popolnoma podpira predlagane spremembe, da se Odločba 90/424/EGS uskladi z novo, širšo opredelitvijo AI, ki vključuje tako HPAI kot LPAI.
The committee fully endorses the proposed changes to align Decision 90/424/EEC to the new, wider definition of AI that includes both HPAI and LPAI.
Vendar pa se ne strinja s predlaganim finančnim prispevkom 30% državam članicam za stroške, ki jih lahko imajo ob uveljavljanju politike izkoreninjenja v primeru izbruha LPAI.
It does not, however, agree with the proposed financial contribution of 30% to Member States for costs which they incur in the event of a stamping-out policy being applied following outbreaks of LPAI.
Po utemeljitvi Komisije je nižji prispevek glede na predlaganih 50% za stroške, povezane z izbruhom HPAI, upravičen zaradi manjšega tveganja pri LPAI.
The Commission argues that this reduced contribution, in comparison with the proposed 50% for costs related to an outbreak of HPAI, is justified due to the reduced risk from LPAI.
Zavzemajo se za ohranitev možnosti izbire držav članic, da ne izvajajo politike izkoreninjenja v primeru izbruha LPAI, če tako želijo, in domnevajo, da bi višji odstotek prispevka utegnil vplivati na proces sprejemanja odločitev v državah članicah.
It believes that Member States should maintain the option not to apply a stamping-out policy in event of a LPAI outbreak if they so wish, and suspects that a higher percentage contribution might influence the decision-making process of Member States.
Četudi odbor povsem razume sklepanje Komisije, meni, da je enak prispevek Skupnosti v višini 50% tako za HPAI kot LPAI ustrezen zaradi dveh razlogov:
Although the committee fully understands the reasoning of the Commission, it feels that an equal Community contribution of 50%, to both HPAI and LPAI, is appropriate for two reasons:
1) Tveganje, da bi v javnost prišlo nejasno in dvoumno sporočilo, odtehta morebitne prihranke pri stroških v argumentu Komisije.
1) The risks of sending an unclear, confusing message to the public outweigh any potential cost saving in the Commission's argument.
Če je smisel spreminjanja Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS, da se prizna morebitna nevarnost LPAI, je gotovo nelogično s predlagano razliko v finančni pomoči trditi, da je LPAI 20% manj nevarna od HPAI.
If the point of amending Council Decision 90/424/EEC is to acknowledge that LPAI is potentially dangerous it is surely illogical to assert, through a proposed difference in financial assistance, that LPAI is 20% less dangerous than HPAI.
Ali je nevarna ali ni nevarna.
Either it is dangerous or it is not.
Treba je storiti vse, da se kar najbolj zmanjšajo nedoslednosti in zavajajoče informacije pri soočanju z odzivom javnosti na izbruh.
In dealing with public reaction following an outbreak every possible effort must be taken to minimise inconsistency and misleading information.
2) Argument Komisije je veljaven le v omejenem številu primerov, ker bi lahko tudi izbruh LPAI v določenih okoliščinah zahteval uničenje prizadetih živali.
2) As an outbreak of LPAI might, depending on the circumstances, also necessitate a stamping-out of the animals concerned, the Commission's argument only applies to a limited number of cases.
V primerih, ko se bodo države članice morale odločati ali za poboj ali za zakol, jih je treba spodbujati, da sprejmejo hitro, vendar premišljeno odločitev, ki bo temeljila na skrbi za zdravje živali in ljudi in ne bo pod vplivom spodbud ekonomske narave.
In these cases, where Member States will have to decide whether to kill or to slaughter, they should be encouraged to take a rapid, but considered, decision based on animal and human health concerns rather than being influenced by incentives of an economic nature.
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano poziva Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Zaradi sprejetja Direktive xxx je primerno prilagoditi Direktivo 90/424/EGS, tako da se finančna pomoč Skupnosti lahko dodeli tudi za ukrepe izkoreninjenja, ki jih države članice izvajajo v boju proti nizko patogenim virusom aviarne influence, ki lahko mutirajo v visoko patogene različice.
(4) In the light of the adoption of Directive xxx it is appropriate to modify Decision 90/424/EEC so that Community financial assistance may also be granted for those eradication measures carried out by the Member States to combat avian influenza virus strains of low pathogenicity that may mutate into highly pathogenic strains.
Člen 3a, odstavek 3, alineja 1 (Odločba 90/424/EGS)
Article 3 a, paragraph 3, indent 1 (Decision 90/424/EEC)
- pri visoko patogeni aviarni influenci 50 % in pri nizko patogeni aviarni influenci 50% naslednjih stroškov, ki jih imajo države članice pri povrnitvi škode lastnikom rejnih živali za poboj, uničenje živali, uničenje živalskih proizvodov, čiščenje in razkuževanje gospodarstev in opreme, uničenje kontaminirane krme in uničenje kontaminirane opreme, če se je ne da razkužiti,
- in the case of highly pathogenic avian influenza 50% and in the case of low pathogenic avian influenza 50% of the following costs, incurred by the Member State in compensating livestock owners for the killing, the destruction of animals, the destruction of animal products, the cleaning and disinfection of holdings and equipment, the destruction of the contaminated feedingstuffs and for the destruction of contaminated equipment, where such equipment cannot be disinfected,
Tveganje, da bi v javnosti prišlo nejasno in dvoumno sporočilo, odtehta morebitne prihranke pri stroških v argumentu Komisije.
The risk of sending an unclear, confusing message to the public outweighs any potential cost saving in the Commission's argument.
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUN
OPINIONOF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano poziva Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Komisija mora preučiti možnost ustanovitve Evropskega sklada za zdravje živali, glede na to da bodo v primeru nove epidemije proračunske zaloge morda nezadostne.
The Commission shall investigate the establishment of an European animal health fund, as budgetary provisions are likely to be insufficient in the event of a new epidemic.
Ta sklad bi moral pokrivati stroške za izbruhe nalezljivih bolezni pri živalih.
This fund could cover the costs of outbreaks of contagious animal diseases.
Živinorejci in druge osebe, ki jih to prizadene, kakor tudi podjetja znotraj Evropske unije, bi lahko prispevali v ta sklad.
Livestock farmers and other affected people and business within the European Union could contribute to this fund.
Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2759/75, (EGS) št. 2771/75, (EGS) št. 2777/75, (ES) št. 1254/1999, (ES) št. 1255/1999 in (ES) št. 2529/2001, ki zadevajo posebne ukrepe za podporo trgu, se morajo uskladiti s spremenjenim sklepom Sveta 90/424/EGS.
Council Regulations (EEC) No 2759/75, (EEC) No 2771/75, (EEC) No 2777/75, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1255/1999 and (EC) No 2529/2001 concerning exceptional market support measures shall be brought in line with the Council Decision 90/424/EEC, as amended.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1, B
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1, B
– 'zakol za bolezen dovzetnih živali, ki so bolne ali okužene oziroma za katere se sumi, da so bolne ali okužene, in njihovo uničenje ter pri kokošji kugi uničenje jajc',
– ‘the slaughter of animals of susceptible species which are affected or contaminated or suspected of being affected or contaminated, and their destruction, and, in the case of avian influenza, destruction of the eggs,
– 'zakol za bolezen dovzetnih živali, ki so bolne ali okužene oziroma za katere se sumi, da so bolne ali okužene, in njihovo uničenje ter pri kokošji kugi uničenje jajc in izguba vrednosti v primeru, da se za jajca ali perutnino najdejo druge destinacije in če je prihodek iz tega nižji kot je normalna vrednost jajc ali perutnine',
– ‘the slaughter of animals of susceptible species which are affected or contaminated or suspected of being affected or contaminated, and their destruction, and, in the case of avian influenza, destruction of the eggs and the loss in value in case other destinations are found for eggs or poultry, revenue from these being lower than the normal value of the eggs or poultry ,
Člen 3a, odstavek 2 (Odločba 90/424/EGS)
Article 3 a, paragraph 2 (Decision 90/424/EEC)
Zadevna država članica prejme finančni prispevek Skupnosti za izkoreninjenje aviarne influence, če so bili minimalni ukrepi nadzora iz Direktive xxx v celoti in učinkovito izvedeni v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti in če so, v primeru uničenja dovzetnih živalskih vrst, ki so bile prizadete ali okužene oziroma domnevno prizadete ali okužene, uničenja jajc ali izgube vrednosti, če se za jajca in perutnino najdejo druge destinacije, prihodek iz tega pa je nižji od njihove normalne vrednosti , živinorejci hitro prejeli ustrezno odškodnino.
The Member State concerned shall obtain a financial contribution from the Community for the eradication of avian influenza if the minimum control measures provided for in Directive xxx have been fully and efficiently implemented in compliance with relevant Community legislation and, in the case of killing of animals of susceptible species, destruction of eggs and the loss in value in case other destinations are found for eggs or poultry, revenue from these being lower than their normal value, and which are affected or contaminated or suspected of being affected or contaminated, livestock owners have been compensated swiftly and adequately.
To med drugim pomeni, da bi diferenciacija prišla v poštev v primeru, kadar se odškodnine dodeljujejo za različne vrste jajc.
This means among other things that differentiation should be applied when compensation is being given for different kinds of eggs.
Člen 3a, odstavek 3, alinea 1 (Odločba 90/424/EGS)
Article 3 a, paragraph 3, indent 1 (Decision 90/424/EEC)
-pri visoko patogeni aviarni influenci 50 % in pri nizko patogeni aviarni influenci 30 % naslednjih stroškov, ki jih imajo države članice pri povrnitvi škode lastnikom rejnih živali za poboj, uničenje živali, uničenje živalskih proizvodov , izgubo vrednosti v primeru, ko se za jajca in perutnino najdejo druge destinacije, prihodek iz tega pa je nižji od njihove normalne vrednosti, čiščenje in razkuževanje gospodarstev in opreme, uničenje kontaminirane krme in uničenje kontaminirane opreme, če se je ne da razkužiti,
- in the case of highly pathogenic avian influenza 50% and in the case of low pathogenic avian influenza 50% of the following costs, incurred by the Member State in compensating livestock owners for the killing, the destruction of animals, the destruction of animal products , the loss in value in case other destinations are found for eggs or poultry, the revenue from these being lower than the normal value of the eggs or poultry, the cleaning and disinfection of holdings and equipment, the destruction of the contaminated feedingstuffs and for the destruction of contaminated equipment, where such equipment cannot be disinfected,
Predlog Odločbe Sveta o spremembi Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS o odhodkih na področju veterine
Proposal for a Council decision amending Council Decision 90/424/EEC on expenditure in the veterinary field
Posvetovanje z Odborom regij Date sklepa na zasedanju
Committee of the Regions consulted Date of decision in plenary