natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Stališče poročevalca
The Position of the Rapporteur
Poročevalec poudarja, da cilj glede ohranitve biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010, ni več daleč.
The Rapporteur stresses that the 2010 biodiversity target is just around the corner.
Obstaja vse večje soglasje o tem, kaj je treba storiti, da se bo biotska raznovrstnost v naslednjih letih ohranila:
There’s an emerging consensus about what needs to be done to save biodiversity within the next years:
Vrste in ekosistemi potrebujejo prostor za svoj razvoj in obnavljanje.
Species and ecosystems need space to develop and recover.
Ohranjanje storitev ekosistemov, kot ga spodbuja sporočilo Komisije, bi moralo postati temeljni cilj vseh horizontalnih in sektorskih politik EU.
The maintenance of ecosystem services - as promoted by the Commission Communication- should become a fundamental goal of all EU horizontal and sectoral policies.
Pri 75 odstotkih skupnega ribjega staleža je stopnja največjega dovoljenega izkoriščanja že dosežena ali celo presežena.
75% of all fisheries are fully exploited or over-fished.
Vrste, kot so trska, vahnja in navadni jezik so že zdaj ogrožene.
Species like cod, haddock and halibut are already threatened.
Če ne bomo prešli na trajnostno uporabo, bo za naše vnuke zmanjkalo rib.
If we do not move towards sustainable use, there will be no fish left for our grandchildren.
Poročevalec se zaveda nevarnosti, ki jih za ribje staleže, neciljne vrste in morske habitate pomenijo ekološko nesprejemljive ribolovne prakse, skupaj z nezakonitim ribolovom.
The Rapporteur thus recognises the threats posed to fish stocks, non-target species and marine habitats caused by ecologically unsustainable fishing practices including illegal fishing;
Ceste, tovarne in stanovanjski objekti uničujejo življenjski prostor živali in rastlin.
Roads, factories and housing destroy habitats for animals and plants.
Če narava pri urbanem in podeželskem razvoju tudi v prihodnje ne bo upoštevana, bosta v naši okolici prevladovala beton in onesnaževanje.
If urban and rural development continues to ignore nature, our surroundings will be dominated by concrete and pollution.
Podnebne spremembe veljajo kot največji izziv za človeštvo.
Climate change is considered to be the greatest challenge for humanity.
V spremenjenih pogojih se bodo spremenili tudi ekosistemi in življenjski prostori.
With changing conditions, ecosystems and habitats will change as well.
Poročevalec poudarja, da je ekosistemski pristop ključnega pomena za prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam, zlasti v zvezi z ukrepi, ki vplivajo na uporabo tal, vode in morja.
The Rapporteur stresses the vital importance of an ecosystem approach for adaptation to climate change, in particular in relation to policies which affect land, water and marine use.
Proti spremembi podnebja se moramo boriti in zagotoviti, da se bodo vrste lahko selile ali se prilagodile novim razmeram.
It is an obligation to fight climate change and make sure that species can migrate or adapt to new surroundings.
Vrsta, naseljena zunaj svojega običajnega življenjskega prostora, lahko preprosto umre.
If you release a species outside its usual habitat, it might simply die.
Po drugi strani so se razvile tako imenovane invazivne tuje vrste, ki so uničile lokalno rastlinstvo in živalstvo.
In other cases, the so-called alien invasive species have thrived and destroyed local flora and fauna.
Ker ni mogoče predvideti, kako se bo to končalo, je treba te invazije zmanjšati.
As you never know how things turn out, reducing these invasions is crucial.
Glede na to poročevalec poudarja, da se širjenje invazivnih tujih vrst zaostruje z vse večjim pretokom ljudi in blaga ter poziva k oblikovanju celostnega odziva Skupnosti na ta problem, ki bi vključeval sistem zgodnjega opozarjanja, ukrepe za zapolnitev vrzeli v zakonodajnem okviru ter razvoj strategije EU za boj proti invazivnim tujim vrstam.
In this regard the Rapporteur stresses that the spread of IAS is exacerbated by the increasing movement of people and goods and urges for the development of a comprehensive community response to the problem, including an early warning system, measures to fill in the gaps in the legislative framework, including the development of an EU Strategy on IAS.
Biotska raznovrstnost je temelj trajnostnega razvoja.
Biodiversity is the foundation for sustainable development.
Njene storitve ekosistemov tvorijo osnovo vseh gospodarskih dejavnosti.
Its ecosystem services provide the basis for all economic activity.
Vprašanja biotske raznovrstnosti je treba upoštevati na vseh področjih oblikovanja politike.
Biodiversity concerns need thus be integrated into all areas of policy-making.
K ukrepom spadajo tržne spodbude, razvojna pomoč, biotski raznovrstnosti prijazna trgovina in mednarodni postopki upravljanja.
Measures include market incentives, development assistance, biodiversity-friendly trade and international governance processes.
Države članice so dolžne uporabiti vse možnosti, ki so dane v okviru skupne kmetijske in skupne ribiške politike, kohezijskih in strukturnih skladov, programa Life+ ter sedmega okvirnega programa, zato da podprejo cilje v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo, ter dodeljevati nacionalna sredstva.
Member States must take up all available opportunities under CAP, CFP, Cohesion and Structural Funds, LIFE+ and Seventh Framework Programme in order to support the biodiversity targets and to allocate national resources.
Poleg tega je treba pri reviziji proračuna 2008-09 nameniti večjo pozornost finančnim potrebam in pri tem oceniti primernost in razpoložljivost sredstev, ki jih EU namenja biotski raznovrstnosti, zlasti Naturi 2000.
Moreover greater consideration must be given to financial needs in the 2008-09 budget review, during which there should be an assessment of the sufficiency and availability of EU financing for biodiversity, especially for Natura 2000.
Naposled poročevalec pozdravlja Akcijski načrt EU do leta 2010 in pozneje ter se zaveda, da je to nujno potrebno orodje in zadnja priložnost, da se pri ključnih ukrepih za izpolnitev obveznosti do leta 2010 združijo udeleženci na ravni Skupnosti in držav članic.
Lastly but not least, the Rapporteur recognises that the EU Action Plan to 2010 and Beyond is a vital tool and last opportunity to bring together actors at Community and MS levels on key actions to meet the 2010 commitments.
Glede na kratek čas, ki še ostaja za njegovo izvajanje, pa mora Komisija zagotoviti vse potrebne strukture za njegovo takojšnje in učinkovito izvajanje na ravni Skupnosti in držav članic.
However given the limited time remaining for implementation the Commission must ensure that the necessary structures are in place for its immediate and effective implementation at Community and MS levels.
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. opozarja na bogastvo vrst in genetske raznovrstnosti kmetijskih rastlin in živali ter zagovarja ohranjanje in krepitev te raznovrstnosti;
Points to the wide richness of species and genetic diversity of agricultural crops and animals, and argues in favour of preserving and strengthening that diversity;
6. meni, da so poglavitni dejavniki za izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti podnebne spremembe, degradacija okolja, intenzivno kmetovanje ter neustrezno upravljanje gozdnih in vodnih virov;
Believes the main factors behind the loss of biological diversity to be climate change, environmental degradation, the use of intensive farming methods and inappropriate forest and water resource management;
11. ugotavlja, da finančna sredstva za Sklad za razvoj podeželja, kohezijske in strukturne sklade ter program Life+ v finančnem okviru za obdobje 2007–2013 kot prednostno nalogo omogočajo nadaljnje financiranje projektov biotske raznovrstnosti in omrežja Natura 2000;
Notes that funding made available under the financial framework 2007-2013 for the Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), the Cohesion and Structural Funds and Life+ above all provides the opportunity to further finance, as a matter of priority, biodiversity projects and the Natura 2000 network;
13. obžaluje dejstvo, da sredstva, namenjena Skladu za razvoj podeželja, nikakor ne zadostujejo za dosego želenega učinka na upravljanje omrežja Natura 2000 pri kmetijstvu in gozdarstvu, pri čemer je zlasti skromna podpora za povečanje znanja in nadzora;
Deplores the fact that the available EAFRD funding falls woefully short of what would be necessary to produce the desired effect on management of the Natura 2000 network, as determined by farming and forestry, the support proposed for improving knowledge and monitoring being particularly meagre;
16. meni, da mora imeti kmetijstvo kot uporabnik biotske raznovrstnosti bistveno vlogo pri njenem upravljanju in ohranjanju; meni tudi, da mora skupna kmetijska politika spodbujati trajnostne modele proizvodnje, ki so gospodarsko zanesljivi in hkrati vplivajo na okolje, pomen ter obnovo biotske raznovrstnosti številnih živalskih, rastlinskih in mikrobnih vrst;
Takes the view that, as a user of biodiversity, agriculture has a key role to play in managing and maintaining that biodiversity; considers that the common agricultural policy (CAP) must henceforth promote sustainable production models which, while being economically viable, enable action to be taken on the environment and on regenerating and rehabilitating the biodiversity of as many animal, plant and microbial species as possible;
19. poziva, naj se pridelava in uporaba biomase za proizvodnjo energije ter kot gorivo izkoristi kot priložnost za povečanje biotske raznovrstnosti v kmetijstvu; meni, da morajo to odražati tudi sredstva za raziskave v sedmem okvirnem programu za raziskave ter da se zaradi pridelave biomase ne sme izgubljati biotska raznovrstnost v Evropski uniji ali zunaj nje;
Calls for the cultivation and use of biomass for the production of energy and as a fuel to be seized as an opportunity to increase biodiversity in agriculture; considers that this should also be reflected in the funding of research under the Seventh Framework Programme for research and that the cultivation of biomass should not be allowed to lead to a decline in biodiversity, either within or outside the European Union;
21. obžaluje, da je vidikom biotske raznovrstnosti v dvostranskih in večstranskih trgovinskih sporazumih namenjeno malo pozornosti; zagovarja vključevanje razsežnosti biotske raznovrstnosti v mednarodno trgovino in v svetovna prizadevanja za spremembo netrajnostne proizvodnje in potrošniških vzorcev; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v sedanjih pogajanjih STO dajo prednost netrgovinskim zadevam;
Regrets the limited attention paid to biodiversity aspects in bilateral and multilateral trade agreements; advocates integration of the biodiversity dimension into international trade and into global efforts to change unsustainable production and consumption patterns; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to give first priority to recognition of the Non-Trade Concerns in the ongoing WTO negotiations;
26. meni, da mora biti celotna družba EU, skupaj s poslovnim in izobraževalnim sektorjem, dejavno vključena v proces zaščite biotske raznovrstnosti;
Takes the view that the whole of EU society, including the business and education sectors, needs to be actively involved in the biodiversity protection process;
Odbor za ribištvo poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Fisheries calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. meni, da je nujno spodbujati sporazume in usklajene akcijske načrte med EU in tretjimi državami, katerih namen je ohranjanje skupnih morskih območij;
Considers it vital to promote agreements and concerted action plans between the EU and third countries aimed at the preservation of common marine areas.
5. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi poseben akcijski program za boj proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in zakonsko neurejenemu ribolovu, ki najbolj ogroža obnovo ribjih staležev;
Calls on the Commission to draw up a specific action programme to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU), which constitutes a fundamental threat to the replenishment of fish stocks.
8. ugotavlja, da je spodbujanje selektivnih metod ribolova prednostna naloga, ker prispeva k trajnosti ribištva in ohranjanju biotske raznovrstnosti, saj zmanjšuje prilov;
Notes that the promotion of selective fishing methods constitutes a priority because it will contribute towards the sustainability of fisheries and the maintenance of biodiversity by reducing by-catches.
12. izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi posledic vnosa eksotičnih vrst in verjetnega uhajanja gensko spremenjenih rib v morske ekosisteme na biotsko raznovrstnost ter poziva Komisijo k nadaljnji preučitvi ogroženosti;
Expresses its concern at the repercussions the introduction of exotic species and the likely escape of genetically modified fish into marine ecosystems may have on biodiversity, and calls on the Commission to study the dangers further.
14. poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja in podpre študije, povezane z gojenjem novih vrst v ujetništvu, zlasti vrst, ki jih je prizadel prelov, s čimer bi se odzvali na potrebe trga, ki bi lahko bil ogrožen zaradi zmanjšanega ulova;
Urges the Commission to encourage and support studies linked to the rearing of new species in captivity, particularly species affected by overfishing, thereby responding to market needs that are potentially threatened by the reduction in catches.
Zaustavitev izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010
Halting the loss of Biodiversity by 2010
o stanovanjski in regionalni politiki
on housing and regional policy
– ob upoštevanju zakonodaje o strukturnih skladih za obdobje 2007-2013,
– having regard to the rules governing the Structural Funds for the period 2007-2013,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. septembra 2006 o tematski strategiji za urbano okolje
– having regard to its resolution of 26 September 2006 on a thematic strategy for the urban environment
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0367 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0367 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. oktobra 2005 o urbani dimenziji v okviru širitve
– having regard to its resolution of 13 October 2005 on the urban dimension in the context of enlargement
UL C 233 E, 28.9.2006, str.
OJ C 233 E, 28.9.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Sveta z dne 12. februarja 2001 o kakovosti arhitekturne zasnove mestnega in podeželskega okolja
– having regard to the Council's resolution of 12 February 2001 on architectural quality in urban and rural environments
UL C 73, 6.3.2001, str.
OJ C 73, 6.3.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije: Kohezijska politika in mesta: prispevek mest in naselij k rasti in zaposlovanju v regijah ( KOM(2006)0385 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication: Cohesion Policy and cities: the urban contribution to growth and jobs in the regions ( COM(2006)0385 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije: Tematska strategija za urbano okolje ( KOM(2005)0718 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication: the Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment ( COM(2005)0718 ),
– ob upoštevanju bristolskega sporazuma z dne 7. decembra 2005, ki med osmimi značilnostmi trajnostne zasnove mesta navaja kakovostno, dobro načrtovano in dobro zgrajeno mestno okolje,
– having regard to the Bristol Accord of 7 December 2005, which mentions, among the eight characteristics of a sustainable city, a well-designed and well-built high-quality urban environment,
– ob upoštevanju socialne listine Sveta Evrope - revidirana različica (STE 163), podpisane v Strasbourgu 3. maja 1995,
– having regard to the Social Charter of the Council of Europe – revised version (ETS 163), signed in Strasbourg on 3 May 1996,
– ob upoštevanju evropske stanovanjske listine, ki jo je 26. aprila 2006 sprejela medskupina za mestna in stanovanjska vprašanja,
– having regard to the European Charter on Housing adopted by its Urban Housing Intergroup on 26 April 2006,
– ob upoštevanju vancouverske izjave o naseljih, objavljene na konferenci Združenih narodov o dostojnem bivanju Habitat 1, ki je potekala od 31. maja do 11. junija 1976 v Vancouvru;
– having regard to the Vancouver Declaration On Human Settlements proclaimed at the UN Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat I) held between 31 May and 11 June 1976 in Vancouver,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij (345/2006) in Ekonomsko-socialnega odbora (407/2007) v skladu s členoma 117 in 118 Poslovnika,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (345/2006), and that of the European Economic and Social Committee (407/2007), in application of Rule 117 and 118 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0090/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0090/2007 ),
A. ker pomanjkanje dostojnih stanovanj po dostopnih cenah neposredno vpliva na življenje državljanov, saj omejuje možnosti za socialno vključevanje in mobilnost tako v mestih kot na podeželju,
A. whereas the lack of decent housing at affordable prices directly affects the lives of citizens, restricting their options for social integration and mobility in both urban and rural areas,
B. ker se številna mesta v Evropski uniji srečujejo z velikimi stanovanjskimi težavami, kot so prevelika ali nezadostna ponudba, odvisno od regije ali države, izjemen porast stroškov nakupa in vzdrževanja ter slabo stanje stanovanjskih objektov; ker slabo vzdrževanje pogosto vodi v rušenje obstoječega stanovanjskega premoženja, kar lahko zaradi pomanjkanja celostne razvojne strategije privede do novih neenakosti na stanovanjskem področju,
B. whereas many European Union cities are experiencing great problems with housing, such as abundant or insufficient supply, depending on the region or country, homelessness, soaring costs of purchase and maintenance and buildings in a bad state of repair; whereas poor maintenance often leads to the demolition of existing housing patrimony, which can give rise to new inequalities in terms of urban planning in the absence of an integrated development strategy;
C. ker je treba vprašanje stanovanj v mestih obravnavati kot del širšega urbanističnega načrtovanja, povezanega s težavami, kot so osiromašenje nekaterih četrti, propadanje okolja (onesnaženost zraka in vode, hrup, odpadki, pregosta naseljenost itd.), slabo delovanje javnih storitev, dostopnost, varnost itd.,
C. whereas the issue of urban housing should be seen against the wider background of town planning and thus as being related to problems such as the impoverishment of certain areas, environmental degradation (air and water pollution, noise, waste, congestion and so on), operational problems in relation to public services, accessibility, security and so on,
D. ker zaradi nerešenih stanovanjskih problemov prihaja do družbene segregacije in getoizacije,
D. whereas difficulties in gaining access to housing are a cause of social segregation and ghettoisation,
E. ker imata demografski razvoj in izseljevanje lahko ponekod za posledico manjše povpraševanje po stanovanjih, prazna stanovanja in zaprtje zlasti kulturne infrastrukture, kar znižuje kakovost življenja v teh mestnih predelih, kjer največkrat ostanejo zgolj socialno šibkejše kategorije prebivalstva,
E. whereas demographic change and depopulation in some regions may lead to a declining demand for housing, empty properties and the downgrading of cultural infrastructure in particular, with the result that quality of life is diminished in the areas concerned, which will be inhabited predominantly by disadvantaged sections of the population,
F. ker kombinacija nizkih dohodkov, visokih cen energije in neustreznega ogrevanja ter izolacije privedejo do revščine in energetske izključenosti,
F. whereas the combination of low incomes, high energy prices and inadequate heating and insulation systems results in energy poverty and energy exclusion,
G. ker se stanovanjska problematika ne omejuje zgolj na izgradnjo bivalnih površin, pač pa zajema tudi socialno infrastrukturo (kulturne centre, knjižnice, stadione, prostore za srečevanje in druženje itd.), ki so pomemben dejavnik družbenega vključevanja in preprečevanja občutka odtujenosti, ki je še posebej razširjen v velikih mestnih naseljih,
G. whereas the housing issue is not simply an issue of construction but also encompass social infrastructure (cultural centres, libraries, stadia, meeting places and so on), which is an important element in social inclusion and in tackling the feeling of alienation that is particularly widespread in large urban areas,
H. ker je socialna izključenost v nasprotju z evropskim socialnim modelom,
H. whereas social exclusion runs counter to the European social model,
I. ker je treba poskrbeti za to, da bodo mestna središča in četrti ohranila utrip in da bodo ohranjene bistvene značilnosti zgradb, razglašenih za zgodovinski spomenik,
I. whereas the vitality of town centres and district centres and of the fabric of listed buildings must be preserved,
J. ker širjenje mest poraja mnoge socialne in gospodarske težave, zlasti v prometu (preobremenjenost javnega prometa, odvisnost od osebnih avtomobilov) in okolju (povečana raba energije, onesnaženost), in težave, povezane z dostopnostjo storitev,
J. whereas urban sprawl is causing numerous social and economic problems affecting transport (congestion in public transport, dependence on private cars), environmental protection (increased energy consumption, pollution) and the accessibility of services,
K. ker je pomembna obnova in sprememba namembnosti opuščenih industrijski območij in zaščita še neokrnjenih območij,
K. having regard to the importance of the regeneration and reutilisation of brownfield sites and the protection of greenfield sites,
L. ker k razcvetu mestnih območij prispevajo finančni instrumenti kohezijske politike s spodbujanjem sanacije propadajočih skupnih površin, izvajanjem varnostnih ukrepov in preprečevanjem prestopništva, z ukrepi za učinkovito rabo vode in energije, s podporo socialnemu vključevanju itd.,
L. whereas the financial instruments supporting cohesion policy help to revive urban areas by encouraging the redevelopment of public spaces, the implementation of measures to improve safety and prevent delinquency and the development of measures to encourage the efficient use of water and energy, support for social integration and so on,
M. ker se v velikih montažnih stanovanjskih objektih srečujejo s posebnimi problemi , kot so kakovost bivanja in težave, povezane z obnovo infrastruktur (financiranje vzdrževalnih in obnovitvenih del ter iskanje ustreznih tehničnih in tehnoloških rešitev),
M. having regard to the specific problems relating to large prefabricated buildings, in terms of both the quality of habitat and the difficulties stemming from the redevelopment of infrastructure (funding of maintenance and renovation work and research on appropriate techniques and technologies),
N. ker so z uredbo o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) na voljo sredstva za rešitev številnih posebnih primerov stanovanjskih vprašanj v novih državah članicah
N. whereas the new regulation on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) has made housing eligible for funding in the new Member States in a number of specific cases
Predlog uredbe ES št. 1080/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj: člen 7(2) in uvodni izjavi 5 in 6. ,
Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the European Regional Development Fund: Article 7(2) and Recitals 5 and 6. ,