natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dokončno besedilo po mnenju poročevalcev ustrezno upošteva stališče Odbora za proračunski nadzor glede področij finančne uredbe, ki so v njegovi pristojnosti, kot sta se dogovorila predsednika odborov COBU in COCOBU.
This final text, in the judgement of your rapporteurs, adequately reflects the concerns of the Committee on Budgetary Control in relation to the areas of the Financial Regulation falling within its sphere of competence as agreed between the chairmen of COBU and COCOBU.
Zaradi tega poročevalca predlagata, da Odbor za proračunski nadzor sprejme dokončno besedilo s predlogi sprememb finančne uredbe in pozove Odbor za proračun (pod pogojem, da se besedilo uradno sprejme, ne da bi ga Svet nadalje spremenil), naj predlaga, da Evropski parlament ta postopek razglasi za zaključenega.
In conclusion, your draftsmen proposes that the Committee on Budgetary Control accept the final text of the proposed amendments to the Financial Regulation and invites the Committee on Budgets (subject to the formal adoption thereof without further amendment by the Council) to propose that the European Parliament declare this procedure closed.
Skupna usmeritev, ki jo je sprejel Svet v zvezi s sprejetjem Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
The joint guideline adopted by the Council with a view to adopting a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No. 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
Pripravljavec(-ka) mnenja Datum imenovanja
Draftsmen Date appointed
Ingeborg Gräßle in Borut Pahor 20.6.2006
Ingeborg Gräßle and Borut Pahor 20.6.2006
Namestniki, prisotni pri končnem glasovanju
Substitute(s) present for the final vote
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (11944/2/2006 – C6-0357/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (11944/2/2006 - C6-0357/2006 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 18.5.2006, P6_TA(2006)0217 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0629 )
Texts Adopted , 18.5.2006 , P6_TA(2006)0217 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0629 )
– ob upoštevanju sprememb predloga Komisije ( KOM(2004)0629 /2)
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2004)0629 /2)
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za razvoj ( A6‑0448/2006 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0448/2006 ),
Komisija je predlog uredbe o oblikovanju instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega in gospodarskega sodelovanja, s katerim se je začel postopek za oblikovanje nove pravne podlage za izdatke ES za razvoj, predložila 29. septembra 2004.
The Commission's proposal for a regulation establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation and economic cooperation, which formed the start of the procedure leading to a new legal base for EC development spending, was dated 29 September 2004.
Po objavi predloga je bil zakonodajni postopek dve leti na vijugasti, zaviti in na trenutke zelo težavni poti.
For two years after publication of the proposal, the legislative process followed a path that was tortuous, convoluted and at times fraught with difficulties.
Besedilo pa je od takrat doživelo veliko sprememb.
But the text has come a very long way in that time.
Poročevalec je menil, da je bil prvotni predlog skrajnosten in popolnoma nesprejemljiv za Parlament.
The view of your rapporteur on the original proposal was that it was very extreme and totally unacceptable to Parliament.
Pomenil je napad na pravico Parlamenta v zvezi s postopkom soodločanja in na načela same razvojne politike.
It attacked both Parliament's prerogatives under co-decision and the principles of development policy itself.
Prvi odgovor, ki je pokazal, da želi Parlament zavrniti predlog, je bil soglasno sprejet v Odboru za razvoj, prav tako soglasno pa so ga podprli še trije drugi odbori, ki so podali mnenje.
The first response, signalling Parliament's intention to reject the proposal, was adopted unanimously in the Development Committee and supported, equally unanimously, by the three other committees which gave opinions.
Ta pristop je spodbudil Komisijo in Svet, da sta sedla za pogajalsko mizo, in ju nazadnje prepričal, da spoštujeta pravice Parlamenta v postopku soodločanja ne le pri razvojnem instrumentu ampak tudi pri vseh drugih instrumentih zunanjepolitičnega ukrepanja v okviru "Prodijevega paketa".
This approach brought the Commission and the Council to the negotiating table and ultimately convinced them to respect Parliament’s co-decision powers, not only for the development instrument but also for other External Actions instruments of the ‘Prodi package’.
Za razvojni instrument je bilo na podaljšanih in napornih pogajanjih doseženega zelo veliko – celo toliko, da bo uredba v končni obliki neprepoznavna za tiste, ki so oblikovali prvotni predlog.
For the development instrument, there have been very many achievements resulting from the protracted and difficult negotiations - so much so that the shape of the final regulation will be unrecognisable to those who framed that initial proposal.
Na trenutke je bil pristop, si sta ga uporabili drugi dve instituciji, bolj podoben pritisku kot pa pogajanjem in spoštovanju Evropskega parlamenta kot udeleženca v postopku soodločanja.
There were times when the approach taken by other institutions amounted to pressure, rather than negotiation and respect for the European Parliament as co-decision maker.
Prav tako je bilo presenetljivo, da se je moral Odbor za razvoj občasno zoperstaviti drugim silam v Parlamentu, ki se niso dovolj zavedale, da so bile ogrožene pravice same institucije.
It was also surprising that, at times, the Development Committee had to stand against other forces in Parliament in which it was less well understood that the powers and prerogatives of the institution itself were at stake.
Odbor za razvoj pa je vseskozi ostal enoten in je vztrajal pri svojem stališču.
Throughout all this, the Development Committee stayed united, and stood its ground.
Skupno stališče, ki ga je 23. oktobra 2006 Svet posredoval Parlamentu, vsebuje številne elemente, ki so bili vključeni na željo Parlamenta.
The Common Position transmitted to Parliament by Council on 23 October 2006 includes many elements that were incorporated at the request of Parliament.
Med najpomembnejšimi so:
Among the most important are:
a) Časovno omejena zakonodaja
a) Time-limited legislation
V prvotnem predlogu Komisije ni bilo datuma izteka veljavnosti ali določbe o vmesnem pregledu.
The initial proposal from the European Commission contained no expiry-date or mid-term review clause.
To dvoje je bilo na začetku pogajanj dogovorjeno za vse zunanjepolitične instrumente, tako da bodo zdaj vsi potekli ob koncu nove finančne perspektive leta 2013, postopek revizije pa se bo začel leta 2009.
These were agreed, during the earliest negotiations, for all External Actions instruments, so they will all now expire at the end of the new Financial Perspective in 2013 and the revision process will start in 2009.
b) Poseben instrument za razvojno politiko
b) Specific instrument for development policy
Odbor za razvoj je bil zelo zaskrbljen, ker v prvotnem predlogu ni bil predviden poseben finančni instrument za razvojno politiko.
It was a matter of great concern to the Development Committee that the original proposal did not foresee a financing instrument specifically for development policy.
Politika za države v razvoju je bila združena s politiko za industrijske države, zaradi česar je bilo nemogoče, da bi za katero koli od njiju določili jasne cilje ali specifične prednostne naloge.
Rather, it mixed policy for developing countries with policy for industrialised countries, making it impossible to set clear objectives or specific policy priorities for either of them.
Po številnih nesoglasjih o zakonodajni strukturi za zunanjepolitično ukrepanje so pogajalci Odbora za razvoj dosegli, da bo za industrijske države veljala druga zakonodaja, in Odbor za mednarodno trgovino je prejel nov predlog zanje.
Following much disagreement about the legislative architecture for External Actions, the Development Committee negotiators obtained agreement for industrialised countries to be subject to different legislation, and a new proposal for them has been received by the International Trade Committee.
V skupnem stališču je zajeto to, kar je želel Odbor za razvoj – instrument, ki je posebej namenjen državam v razvoju, imenovan instrument za razvojno sodelovanje.
The Common Position enshrines what the Development Committee wanted - an instrument specifically geared to developing countries, called the Development Cooperation Instrument, or DCI.
Parlament si je prizadeval tudi za poseben instrument za človekove pravice, ki bo pomenil nadaljevanje evropske pobude za demokracijo in človekove pravice, in ga tudi dosegel.
Parliament also battled for, and won, a separate Instrument for Human Rights, which will be the continuation of the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights.
Zakonodajni postopek za ta instrument še poteka.
The legislative procedure for this instrument is ongoing.
c) Enotna pravna podlaga za razvoj – člen 179
c) Single legal base for development - Article 179
Vzporedno s pogovori o zakonodajni strukturi je potekala podobna razprava o pravni podlagi, ki bo veljala za instrument za razvojno sodelovanje.
Along with the discussions on the legislative architecture, there was a related debate on the legal base to apply to the DCI.
Prvotni predlog je temeljil na dveh členih Pogodbe ES – na členu 179, ki govori o razvoju, in členu 181a, ki obravnava sodelovanje s tretjimi državami.
The original proposal was based on two articles of the EC Treaty - Article 179, which covers development, and Article 181a, which relates to cooperation with third countries.
Poročevalec je po pravnem nasvetu pravnih služb Parlamenta in Sveta ugovarjal, da člen 181a ne velja za države v razvoju in da bi moral instrument za razvojno sodelovanje temeljiti samo na členu 179.
Your rapporteur's argument, in line with legal advice from the Legal Services of Parliament and Council, was that Article 181a does not apply to developing countries and the DCI should be based on Article 179 only.
Parlament je to v celoti dosegel.
In this Parliament has been fully successful.
d) Oblikovanje politike s postopkom soodločanja
d) Policymaking by co-decision
Naslednja večja težava glede prvotnega predloga Komisije je bila, da bi z njim Parlamentu skoraj v celoti odvzeli pravico, da s postopkom soodločanja oblikuje politiko za države v razvoju.
Another of the major problems with the Commission's initial proposal was that it sought to remove, almost completely, Parliament's right to set policy for developing countries by co-decision.
Komisija je nameravala oblikovanje politike izvzeti iz področja zakonodaje in namesto tega uporabiti nezavezujoča sporočila.
The Commission intended to take policymaking out of the scope of legislation and use non-binding communications instead.
Edine zavezujoče določbe bi potemtakem bile vključene v strateške dokumente za posamezno državo, regijo ali tematski program – ti bi bili sprejeti s postopkom komitologije, brez sodelovanja Parlamenta.
The only binding policy provisions would then have been included in the strategy papers for each country, region or thematic programme - and these were to be adopted by comitology, without input from Parliament.
Skupaj s Svetom so pogajalci Odbora za razvoj zavrnili pristop, s katerim bi politiko oblikovali s sporočili Komisije, in so se osredotočili na to, da oblikovanje politike ostane v okviru zakonodajnega postopka soodločanja.
Along with Council, the Development Committee negotiators rejected the approach of making policy by means of Commission communications, and concentrated on ensuring that policymaking remained subject to the legislative co-decision procedure.
Skupno stališče, ki je bilo dogovorjeno s Svetom, vsebuje veliko politične vsebine; skoraj vsa je bila vključena kot odgovor na zaskrbljenost Parlamenta.
The Common Position negotiated with Council contains very large amounts of policy content, almost all of it included in response to Parliament's concerns.
To temelji predvsem na politični vsebini 13 uredb o različnih političnih področjih, ki jih bo nadomestil nov instrument za razvojno sodelovanje, o katerem sta se Parlament in Svet v postopku soodločanja večinoma že dogovorila.
This is mainly based on the policy content of the 13 policy regulations which will be replaced by the new DCI, almost all of which had already been agreed by Parliament and Council in co-decision.
e) Natančnejše finančne določbe
e) More detailed financial provisions
Finančne določbe predloga so prav tako zbujale veliko skrb: bile so izredno splošne in zelo daleč od ravni natančnosti, ki je je vajen Parlament kot proračunski organ.
The financial provisions of the proposal were another area of very serious concern: they were extremely general, and very far from the level of detail Parliament, as part of the budgetary authority, was accustomed to handling.
Navedena so bila le celotna finančna sredstva za instrument, skupaj z zneskom za sodelovanje z državami AKP, ki je bil umaknjen, ko se je Evropski svet odločil, da Evropski razvojni sklad ne bo vključen v proračun.
The only information given was the total financial allocation for the whole instrument, along with a figure for ACP cooperation which was subsequently removed when the European Council decided to keep the EDF outside the budget.
V preteklosti so bila za vsak program posebej v postopku soodločanja dodeljena finančna sredstva, predvidena v ločenih uredbah, zato so pogajalci Odbora za razvoj vztrajali, naj tako ostane tudi v prihodnje.
In the past there had been a separate co-decided financial allocation for each programme, enshrined in separate regulations, so the Development Committee negotiators insisted this practice should continue.
Skupno stališče zdaj vsebuje razčlenitev financiranja po programih, v nekaterih primerih pa tudi znotraj programov (kot za nedržavne akterje, ki imajo zdaj skupen program z lokalnimi oblastmi, zaradi česar je nujno potrebna nadaljnja razčlenitev, da bi jim zagotovili nadaljnje prejemanje sredstev, zelo podobnim tistim, ki so jim bila letno dodeljena v preteklih letih).
The Common Position now includes a breakdown of funding by programme, and in some cases within a programme (such as non-state actors, which now have a joint programme with local authorities, making it necessary to request a further breakdown of funding in order to guarantee that they will continue to receive funding very close to their annual allocations in past years).
Novi dosežki
Breaking new ground
Obstajajo tudi področja, na katerih se bo novi instrument za razvojno sodelovanje izrazito oddaljil od predhodne zakonodaje o razvoju, kar je res velik dosežek Parlamenta.
There are also areas where the new DCI will depart markedly from all other development legislation that has gone before it, and this is where Parliament has made really major advances.
a) Odbor OECD za razvojno pomoč pravno priznan
a) OECD Development Assistance Committee legally recognised
To je bistveno, če želimo preprečiti, da bi bil proračun za razvoj okrnjen zaradi ciljev drugih politik.
This is an essential step to preserve the development budget from being poached for other policy objectives.
Sto odstotkov geografskih programov bo zastavljenih tako, da bodo skladni z merili o izpolnjevanju pogojev DAC za uradno razvojno pomoč, enako pa bo veljalo za vsaj 90 % sredstev, dodeljenih tematskim programom.
One hundred percent of geographic programmes will be framed so as to conform to the DAC eligibility criteria for Official Development Aid, and the same will be true for at least 90% of allocations under the thematic programmes.
Preostalih 10 % sredstev za tematske programe bo v okviru programa za migracije in programa za okolje uporabljenih za ukrepe, ki niso povezani z razvojem, vključno z izvajanjem mednarodnih okoljskih sporazumov in podporo sekretariatom številnih pomembnih mednarodnih konvencij na področju okolja.
The remaining 10% of thematic allocations will be used for non-development actions under the Migration programme and the Environment programme, including the implementation of international environment agreements and support to the secretariats of a number of major international conventions in the field of environment.
b) Sporazum o ciljih porabe za instrument za razvojno sodelovanje
b) Agreement on spending targets attached to DCI
Izjava Komisije, priložena novemu instrumentu za razvojno sodelovanje, bo prav tako prvič vsebovala cilj, ki ga Odbor za razvoj od leta 2003 uporablja za spodbujanje osredotočenosti na ključne sektorje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, kot sta osnovno izobraževanje in osnovno zdravstvo.
A Commission declaration attached to the new DCI will contain, also for the first time, the benchmark that the Development Committee has been using since 2003 to promote increased focus on the key MDG sectors of basic education and basic health.
Komisija še nikoli poprej ni sprejela 20-odstotnega cilja odbora za te sektorje in čeprav ga je Parlament v zadnjih treh letih vključil v proračun, ga Komisija ni želela upoštevati.
The Commission has never before accepted the committee's 20% benchmark for these sectors, and even though Parliament has written it into the budget for the last three years, they have refused to implement it.
Sredstva, dodeljena za te sektorje, so vedno bila žalostno nizka.
Allocations to these sectors have always been woefully low.
Toda zdaj se je Komisija v izjavi, priloženi instrumentu za razvojno sodelovanje, zavezala k uresničitvi tega cilja do leta 2009 (pri čemer je vključena dodatna kategorija za sekundarno izobraževanje, saj je to posebej pomembno za države Latinske Amerike s srednje visokim dohodkom).
But now, in the declaration attached to DCI, the Commission signs up to aiming to achieve this benchmark by 2009 (with the additional category of secondary education included, since this is particularly important for the middle-income countries of Latin America).
Poročevalec in drugi poslanci iz pogajalske skupine menijo, da je to zelo pomemben dosežek za Parlament.
Along with the other Members of the Negotiating Team, your rapporteur views this as a very significant gain for Parliament indeed.
c) Demokratični nadzor programskih dokumentov – doseganje napredka
c) Democratic scrutiny of programming documents - moving forward
Nekaj več napredka je bilo doseženega tudi glede dialoga med Parlamentom in Komisijo o osnutkih strateških dokumentov, da bi omogočili učinkovit parlamentarni nadzor nad izvajanjem instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
Some more headway has also been made on the matter of the dialogue between Parliament and the Commission on the draft strategy papers, to allow effective parliamentary scrutiny of the implementation of DCI.
Posebej pomembno je bilo zagotoviti, da lahko Parlament posreduje pravočasno, zato da bi bil njegov vpliv upoštevan še pred sprejetjem strateških dokumentov.
The particular matter of concern was to ensure Parliament could intervene in time for its influence to be meaningful, before the strategy papers are adopted.
Čeprav je bilo v zvezi s tem nekaj nesoglasij s Svetom, je Parlament dobil zagotovilo, da bo Komisija s poslanci vedno pripravljena razpravljati o splošnih temah ali temah, ki so specifične za posamezno državo.
Although there were sensitivities with Council on this subject, Parliament achieved an assurance that the Commission will always be open to discussions with MEPs on general or country-specific topics.
Parlament lahko določi sestavo, v kateri se bo udeležil teh razprav.
Parliament can determine the formation in which it presents itself for such a dialogue.
Ta sporazum bo dobil formalno obliko z izmenjavo pisem med predsednikom Odbora za razvoj ter komisarko Ferrero-Waldner in komisarjem Michelom, preden se bo glasovalo o besedilu skupnega stališča.
This agreement will be formalised in an exchange of letters between the Chair of Development Committee and Commissioners Ferrero-Waldner and Michel before the vote is taken on the Common Position text.
d) Večja vloga Parlamenta pri vmesnem pregledu
d) Increased role for Parliament in the mid-term review
Čeprav zakonodajno besedilo določa, da je treba instrument pregledati "najkasneje do 31. decembra 2010", sta se Parlament in Komisija dogovorila, da Parlament pred začetkom pregleda, ki ga opravi Komisija, preuči delovanje instrumenta, da ugotovi, ali so se pojavile kakšne nepravilnosti.
Although the legislative text states that the instrument shall be revised “no later than 31 December 2010”, Parliament and Commission agreed that before the Commission undertakes the review, Parliament shall examine the operation of the instrument to identify any dysfunctional situations that may have arisen.
Če bodo ugotovljene težave, zaradi katerih bi bilo treba prilagoditi instrument, bo Komisija predložila potrebne zakonodajne predloge.
If problems are identified that require an adaptation of the instrument, the Commission will submit the necessary legislative proposals.
Ta sporazum bo Komisija potrdila pred glasovanjem o besedilu skupnega stališča.
This agreement will be confirmed by the Commission before the vote is taken on the Common Position text.
Priporočilo poročevalca
Recommendation of the Rapporteur
Skupno stališče predstavlja sporazum, ki je bil sprejet ob koncu pogajanj in ki ga je podprl Odbor za razvoj na svoji seji 3. oktobra 2006.
The Common Position represents the agreement reached at the end of the negotiations and endorsed by the Development Committee at its meeting of 3 October 2006.
Glede vprašanja o reproduktivnem zdravju poročevalec ne more z mirno vestjo podpreti strokovnega izrazja, uporabljenega v uvodni izjavi 18, členu 5(2) in členu 12(2)(a), če velja definicija Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije, ki vključuje umetno prekinitev nezaželene nosečnosti.
On the issue of reproductive health, your rapporteur cannot in good conscience support the terminology used in Recital 18, Article 5 (2) b) and Article 12 (2) a), if the WHO definition which includes "interrupting unwanted pregnancies" applies.
V svojem pristopu do instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje sem poskušal ugoditi drugim in sem bil izredno razočaran, ker kljub iskreni zaskrbljenosti nisem dobil podpore.
In my approach to the DCI, I sought to accommodate others and was extremely disappointed that my sincerely held concerns on this issue did not receive support.
Zato naznanjam, da bom podprl prizadevanja za spremembo te ubeseditve.
I give notice therefore that I will support efforts to amend this wording.
Z izjemo tega poročevalec meni, da je skupno stališče, ki ga je pripravil Svet, zelo ugodno za Evropski parlament.
With this exception, your rapporteur considers the Common Position as established by the Council a very good outcome for the European Parliament.
Skupno stališče Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation
o Evropskem akcijskem programu za varnost v cestnem prometu – vmesni pregled
on European Road Safety Action Programme - mid-term review
– ob upoštevanju bele knjige Komisije „Evropska prometna politika za leto 2010: čas za odločitev“ ( KOM(2001)0370 ) in svoje resolucije o tem z dne 12. februarja 2003
– having regard to the Commission White Paper 'European transport policy for 2010: time to decide' ( COM(2001)0370 ), and its resolution of 12 February 2003 thereon