natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The amount decided by the Committee on Budgets will be adjusted as required following this conversion.
The amount decided by the Committee on Budgets will be adjusted as required following this conversion.
[Finančne določbe za upravičence programa]
[Financial provisions concerning the beneficiaries]
V skladu s členom 114(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 so lahko fizične osebe upravičenci programa.
Pursuant to Article 114(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom ) No 1605/2002, natural persons may receive grants under the programme.
Glede na naravo ukrepa so lahko finančne pomoči v obliki subvencij ali štipendij.
Depending on the nature of the action, the financial support may take the form of subsidies or scholarships.
Komisija lahko prav tako določi cene za ukrepe ali projekte, izvajane v okviru programa.
The Commission may also award prizes for actions or projects implemented under the programme.
V skladu s členom 181 Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 in glede na naravo ukrepa se lahko odobri pavšalno financiranje in/ali uporabo ponderiranih enotnih stroškov.
Pursuant to Article 181 of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom ) No 2342/2002, and depending on the nature of the action, flat-rate financing and/or the application of scales of unit costs may be authorised.
Subvencije za poslovanje dodeljene v okviru programa aktivnim organom na evropski ravni, ki so določene v členu 162 Uredbe Komisije št. 2342/2002, niso v skladu s členom 113(2) Uredbe Sveta št. 1605/2002, o postopnem obveznem zmanjševanju v primeru obnove.
Operating grants awarded under this programme to organisations active at European level, as defined in Article 162 of Commission Regulation No 2342/2002, are not automatically decreased in accordance with Article 113(2) of Council Regulation No 1605/2002 in the event of renewal.
V skladu s pododstavkom c) člena 54(2) Uredbe Komisije št. 1605/2002 lahko Komisija zaupa naloge, zlasti naloge izvajanja proračuna struktur iz člena 8(2), v pristojnost javnim službam.
Pursuant to Article 54(2)(c) of Regulation 1605/2002, the Commission may entrust tasks of public authority and, in particular, budget implementation tasks to the structures referred to in Article 8(2).
V skladu s členom 38(1) Uredbe št. 2342/2002 velja možnost, opisana v zgornjem odstavku 5, tudi za strukture sodelujočih držav programa, ki jih ne ureja pravo držav članic, držav EGP-ja ali držav kandidatk za pristop k Evropski uniji.
Pursuant to Article 38(1) of Regulation No 2342/2002, the option in paragraph 5 above also applies to structures in the participating countries that are not governed by the law of the Member States or States of the European Economic Area (EEA) or the candidate countries.
Člen 15, odstavek 3 in 4
Article 15, paragraphs 3 and 4
Sodelujoče države programa predložijo Komisiji najkasneje 30. junija 2010 poročilo o delovanju programa in najkasneje 30. junija 2015 poročilo o vplivu programa.
Participating countries shall submit to the Commission a report on the implementation of the programme by 30 June 2010 at the latest and a report on the impact of the programme by 30 June 2015 at the latest .
Sodelujoče države programa predložijo Komisiji tri leta po sprejetju programa in tri mesece po koncu programa poročilo o vplivu programa in . poročilo o delovanju programa.
Participating countries shall submit to the Commission , three years after the adoption of the programme and three months after the end of the programme, a report on the impact of the programme and a report on the implementation of the programme .
Komisija predstavi Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij:
The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions:
(a) vmesno poročilo o ocenjevanju, ki temelji na rezultatih kvalitativnega in kvantitativnega vidika izvajanja tega programa, in sicer najkasneje do 31. marca 2011;
(a) an interim evaluation report on the results obtained and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation of this programme no later than 31 March 2011 ;
b.) sporočilo o nadaljevanju izvajanja programa, in sicer najkasneje do 31. decembra 2011;
(b) a Communication on the continuation of this programme no later than 31 December 2011 ;
poročilo o naknadni oceni, in sicer najkasneje do 31. marca 2016.
(c) an ex post evaluation report no later than 31 March 2016 .
(a) vmesno poročilo o ocenjevanju, ki temelji na rezultatih kvalitativnega in kvantitativnega vidika izvajanja tega programa, in sicer tri leta po sprejetju programa.
(a) an interim evaluation report on the results obtained and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation of this programme three years after the adoption of the programme ;
b.) sporočilo o nadaljevanju izvajanja programa štiri leta po sprejetju programa;
(b) a Communication on the continuation of this programme four years after the adoption of the programme ;
c.) poročilo o naknadni oceni delovanju in rezultatih programa, do konca izvajanja programa.
(c) an ex post evaluation report on the implementation and outcome of the programme once the implementation of the programme has been completed .
Predlog Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju programa ''Mladi v akciji'' za obdobje 2007-2013
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision creating the ‘Youth in Action’ programme for the period 2007-2013
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju programa „MLADI V AKCIJI“ za obdobje 2007-2013
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council creating the "YOUTH IN ACTION" programme for the period 2007-2013
Pripravljavec mnenja: Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor
Draftsman: Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor
Splošni cilji programa:
General Objectives of the Programme:
Pripravljavec osnutka mnenja pozdravlja program Mladi v akciji, ki ponuja možnosti za razvoj solidarnosti med mladimi in spodbuja aktivno državljanstvo.
The Draftsman generally welcomes the “Youth in Action” programme which gives opportunities to develop solidarity amongst young people and promotes an active citizenship.
Sedanji program „Mladina“ med svoje štiri splošne cilje vključuje spodbujanje samoiniciative, podjetniškega duha in ustvarjalnosti med mladimi, da bi ti lahko prevzeli dejavnejšo vlogo v družbi, in hkrati prizadevanje za priznanje vrednosti neformalnega izobraževanja, pridobljenega v evropskem kontekstu.
The current Youth programme included among its four general aims encouraging “young people’s initiative, enterprise and creativity so that they may take an active role in society and, at the same time, to stimulate recognition of the value of informal education acquired within a European context”.
Predlog Komisije tega cilja ne vključuje med splošne cilje (člen 2), temveč pa ga opredeli znotraj posebnega cilja spodbujanja dejavnega državljanstva mladih (člen 3.1.f).
The proposal presented by the Commission does not include this aim amongst its general aims (Article 2) but within the specific one of promoting the active citizenship of young people (Article 3.1.f).
Poročevalcu ni povsem jasno, zakaj ta dejavnost ni več vključena v novi predlog.
It is not clear to the Draftsman why this action is now not included in the new proposal.
Člen 4(2) Evropska prostovoljna služba
Article 4(2) European Voluntary Service
„Ta dejavnost si prizadeva okrepiti sodelovanje mladih pri različnih oblikah prostovoljnih dejavnosti, znotraj in zunaj Evropske unije.“
'The aim of this action is to step up young people's participation in various forms of voluntary activities, both within and outside the European Union.'
Priloga vsebuje nejasno in neutemeljeno razčlenitev ukrepov, navedenih pod to točko, kljub temu da ti ukrepi zajemajo eno tretjino vseh zanje predvidenih sredstev v predlogu Komisije.
The annex contains a breakdown of the measures coming under this item that is not sufficiently clear and is not duly motivated in the proposal for a decision, despite the fact that the measures account for one third of the total resources set out in the Commission proposal.
Priloga se posebej nanaša na:
Specifically, the annex refers to:
Intervencijska evropska prostovoljna služba
European voluntary service (groups)
"Ta ukrep podpira prostovoljne projekte z enakimi značilnostmi, kot so opisane v točki 2.1 in ki omogočajo skupinam mladih skupinsko sodelovanje pri evropskih ali mednarodnih dejavnostih, še posebej na področjih kulture, športa, civilne zaščite, okolja, pomoči pri razvoju, idr.
This measure supports volunteer projects with the same characteristics as those described in point 2.1 above which allow groups of young people to take part collectively in European-level or international-level activities in the fields of culture, sport, civil protection, the environment, development aid, etc.
Ukrepi se nanašajo predvidoma na mlade med 18. in 30. letom starosti.
In principle, it is open to young people aged between 18 and 30.
Glede na naloge in okoliščine, v katerih so razvrščeni prostovoljci, lahko nekatere vrste projektov intervencijske evropske prostovoljne službe upravičujejo izbor kandidatov glede na posebne sposobnosti.“
Depending on the tasks to be implemented and the situation in which the volunteers are deployed, certain types of project may call for the selection of candidates with specific skills.'
Najprej je treba poudariti, da ti projekti v nasprotju z navedbami Komisije nimajo enakih značilnosti.
It should be pointed out first of all that, contrary to the Commission's claims, the projects do not have the same characteristics.
Ker so oblikovani na podlagi sedanjih ukrepov kolektivne Evropske prostovoljne službe, jih upravlja obsežna usklajevalna organizacija (ki ne spodbuja sodelovanja in partnerstev z lokalnimi organizacijami), njihovo obdobje trajanja je kratko (zato z vidika izobraževanja ne vplivajo na daljše projekte Evropske prostovoljne službe v smislu kulturnega prilagajanja, osebnega razvoja, itd.), poleg tega pa so dragi (okoli 4000 € na projekt, ki traja približno dva meseca, v primerjavi s 4500 € za šestmesečni projekt).
Given that they follow on from the current group EVS measures, the projects will be headed by a large coordinating organisation (which will not be conducive to participation by and partnership with local organisations), they are of short duration (and therefore will not have the educational impact of long EVS projects in terms of cultural adjustment, personal development, etc.), and they are expensive (around € 4 000 for a project lasting two months or so, as against € 4 500 for a six-month project).
Druga možnost je, da to dejavnost pokriva ureditev iz člena III-321 Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo
The other possibility is for this action to cover the arrangement referred to in Article III-321 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
„Zaradi vzpostavitve okvira za prispevek mladih Evropejcev k humanitarnim dejavnostim Unije se ustanovi Evropski prostovoljski zbor za humanitarno pomoč.
'In order to establish a framework for joint contributions from young Europeans to the humanitarian aid operations of the Union, a European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps shall be set up.
Z evropskimi zakoni se določijo pravila in postopki za delovanje zbora.“ , ki pa glede na roke in predpogoje za ustanovitev zbora leta 2007 verjetno ne bo izvedljiva.
European laws shall determine the rules and procedures for operation of the Corps.' ; however, in view of the deadlines and pre-requisites for the establishment of the corps, it is unlikely to be operational in 2007.
Komisija mora natančneje obrazložiti, zakaj je tako velik znesek sredstev dodeljen tej poddejavnosti, in predložiti ugotovitve morebitnih raziskav (presoj vplivov celotne skupine projektov Evropske prostovoljne službe), s katerimi bo podprla svoj predlog.
The Commission should be asked for a more detailed explanation of why such a large amount of money has been allocated to this sub-action and to supply the findings of any studies (assessments of the impact of completed group EVS projects) that support its proposal.
Dejavnosti 2 (Evropska prostovoljna služba) je dodeljen proračun (291.500 €), podoben proračunu za dejavnost 1 (Mladi za Evropo, 310.000 €).
Action 2 (European Voluntary Service) has been allocated a budget (€ 291 500) similar to that of Action 1 (Youth for Europe, € 310 000).
Ker je slednja ne le dosegljiva za veliko večje število mladih, temveč tudi bolj dostopna za mlade s slabšim položajem, zato pripravljavec predlaga, naj bo navedena razčlenitev proračuna skladna z dejanskim stanjem.
Since Action 1 is not only able to reach a far greater number of young people, but is also more accessible for less-advantaged young people, the draftsman proposes that the indicative breakdown budget reflect this situation.
Del sredstev za dejavnost 2 je zato treba prerazporediti na dejavnost 1.
A part of the budget for Action 2 should therefore be transferred to Action 1.
Pogodba Evropske unije temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter na tem, da mora spodbujanje aktivnega državljanstva mladih prispevati k razvoju teh vrednot.
The Treaty on European Union is based on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the promotion of young people's active citizenship should contribute to the development of these values.
(2) Evropska unija temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter na enakosti med moškimi in ženskami ter na tem, da mora spodbujanje aktivnega državljanstva mladih prispevati k razvoju teh vrednot.
(2) The European Union is founded on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and equality between men and women, and the promotion of young people's active citizenship should contribute to the development of these values.
Člen 3, odstavek 1, točka (g)
Article 3, paragraph 1, point (g)
g) nadzorovanje sodelovanja mladih z najmanj možnostmi pri programih, vključno z mladimi invalidi;
g) facilitating participation in the programme by young people with the fewest opportunities , including young people with disabilities ;
(Ta predlog velja za celotno besedilo.
( This amendment applies throughout the text.
V primeru sprejetja je treba celotno besedilo ustrezno spremeniti.)
Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Člen 6, točka 5
Article 6, paragraph 5
Sodelujoče države programa si morajo prizadevati, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe, da imajo udeleženci programov dostop do zdravstvene oskrbe, v skladu z določbami prava Skupnosti.
The participating countries shall endeavour to take appropriate measures so that participants in the programme may have access to health care in accordance with the provisions of Community law.
Izvorna država članica si prizadeva, da sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, tako da udeleženci pri Evropski prostovoljni službi lahko obdržijo svojo socialno zaščito.
The Member State of origin shall endeavour to take appropriate measures so that participants in the European Voluntary Service may retain their social protection.
Države udeleženke si tudi prizadevajo, če je mogoče, za sprejetje takšnih ukrepov, ki se jim zdijo potrebni in zaželeni za odstranitev pravnih in administrativnih ovir za dostop do tega programa.
The participating countries shall also endeavour as far as possible to adopt such measures as they deem necessary and desirable to remove legal and administrative obstacles to access to this programme.
The Commission's proposed wording implies that Member States would have to change systems, which can only be changed under other treaties and not under Article 149.
The Commission's proposed wording implies that Member States would have to change systems, which can only be changed under other treaties and not under Article 149.
Sprejeti morajo ustrezne ukrepe za obveščanje z uporabo najprimernejših sredstev in ob pomoči nacionalnih agencij usmeriti obveščanje o programih na manjše organizacije, zlasti na regionalni in lokalni ravni.
They will take appropriate measures to disseminate information through the use of the most appropriate tools and, with the aid of the National Agencies, target information about the programme towards smaller organisations, especially at regional and local level.
Predlog Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju programa „MLADI V AKCIJI“ za obdobje 2007-2013
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council creating the "YOUTH IN ACTION" programme for the period 2007-2013
o Predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju programa „Mladi v akciji“ za obdobje 2007–2013
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council creating the "Youth in action" programme for the period 2007-2013
Pravna podlaga predloga za program Mladi v akciji za 2007–2013 je člen 149 Pogodbe ES, ki navaja, da so cilji dejavnosti Skupnosti „spodbujanje razvoja izmenjave mladih ter izmenjave pedagoških in drugih strokovnih delavcev“ .
The proposal for the Youth in Action -programme for 2007-2013 has its legal basis in Article 149 of the EC Treaty, which states that Community action shall be aimed at "encouraging the development of youth exchanges and of exchanges of social-educational instructors."
Cilj predloga je spodbujati solidarnost in mobilnost med mladimi Evropejci v EU in v sosednjih področjih.
The aim of the proposal is to promote solidarity and mobility among young Europeans in the EU and in the neighbouring areas.
Cilji so opredeljeni kot:
The objectives are detailed as:
– spodbujanje dejavnega državljanstva mladih na splošno in še zlasti evropskega državljanstva,
- promoting young people’s active citizenship in general and their European citizenship in particular
– razvijanje solidarnosti mladih, še zlasti da bi okrepili socialno kohezijo v Evropski uniji,
- developing young people’s solidarity, in particular in order to reinforce social cohesion in the European Union
– pospeševanje medsebojnega razumevanja med narodi prek mladih,
- fostering mutual understanding between peoples through young people
– prispevanje k razvoju kakovosti sistemov podpore za dejavnosti mladih in sposobnosti organizacij civilne družbe na področju mladih,
- contributing to developing the quality of support systems for youth activities and the capabilities of civil society organisations in the youth field
– spodbujanje evropskega sodelovanja v mladinski politiki.
- promoting European cooperation in youth policy.
Te cilje je treba doseči v petih programih: „Mladi za Evropo“ (izmenjave in mobilnost), „Evropska prostovoljna služba“ (dejavno sodelovanje), „Mladi sveta“ (sosednje in tretje države), „Mladi delavci in podporni sistemi“ (podporne strukture za mlade) in „Podpora političnega sodelovanja“ (sodelovanje na področju mladinske politike).
These objectives are to be pursued inside five programmes: "Youth for Europe" (exchanges and mobility), "European Voluntary Service" (active engagement), "Youth of the world" (neighbouring and third countries), "Youth workers and support systems" (support structures for young people), and "Support for policy cooperation" (cooperation on youth policy).
Predlog izpeljuje dosežke sedanjega programa MLADINA, ki se izteče v letu 2006.
The proposal carries forth the achievements of the current YOUTH-programme, which expires in 2006.
Utrjuje proračunske določbe in že obstoječe programe na področju mladih ter poenostavlja način uporabe, izbire in vodenja projektov.
It consolidates budgetary provisions and existing programmes in the field of youth, and simplifies the way projects are applied for, chosen and managed.
Tako bo ustvaril izjemno prepoznaven in neodvisen mladinski program za EU, z 915 milijoni EUR, namenjenimi za obdobje programa (2007–2013).
It would thus create an increasingly visible and autonomous Youth-programme for the EU, with EUR 915 million earmarked for the period of the programme (2007-2013).
Ocena predloga
Assessment of the proposal
V celoti predlog temelji na sedanjih izkušnjah ter želi okrepiti poudarke in učinkovitost dejavnosti Skupnosti na pomembnem področju mladih.
On the whole, the proposal builds on existing experience and seeks to strengthen the salience and efficiency of Community action in the important youth-domain.
Novosti so večinoma v usmerjanju uradništva in lahko zato omogočijo programom EU, da na tem področju postanejo pomembnejši in cilj za tiste dejavnosti, ki potrebujejo podporo EU.
Its innovations are mainly in streamlining bureaucracy, and it can thereby enable EU programmes in this field to become more relevant and targeted for those actions in need of EU support.
Vendar številne točke potrebujejo posebno pozornost.
However, a number of points deserve special attention.
Najprej je treba razpravljati o tem, ali je predlagana vsota 915 milijonov EUR dovolj za podporo vseh navedenih ciljev, še zlasti za učinkovite izmenjave mladih z drugimi državami.
First, it is debatable whether the proposed sum of EUR 915 million is enough to support all the outlined objectives, especially for robust youth exchanges with other countries.
Razen tega je treba seznam držav, ki lahko sodelujejo pri programih, kot je navedeno v členu 5(1), razširiti za vključitev, na primer, tudi Kitajske in Rusije.
Furthermore, the list of countries eligible to participate in the programmes, as listed in Article 5 paragraph 1, should be enlarged to include, for example, China and Russia.
Ciljev se ne sme določati na preveč samoumeven način: tisti, ki imajo večjo možnost za prispevanje k pomembnim ciljem mladine (tj. spodbujanje izmenjav in mobilnosti mladih za zmanjševanje nezaposlenosti mladih ali osredotočanje na invalide za podporo možnosti zaposlitve), morajo imeti prednost pred manj dejavnimi ciljnimi področji, kot je povečevanje sodelovanja mladih pri zagotavljanju prostovoljnih služb.
What is more, the targets should not be prescribed in an overly a priori fashion: those that have a significant chance of contributing to important youth-aims (e.g. promoting youth exchanges and mobility for alleviating youth unemployment, or focusing on the disabled in order to support their employment-prospects) should emerge as priorities over some of the less operative target areas, such as increasing youth engagement in providing voluntary services.
Ne sme se spregledati lokalne in kulturne tradicije ter, na primer, vnaprej določene omejitve starosti in zahteve o izobrazbi ne smejo narekovati dostopa do teh ukrepov (tj. dejavnosti 2.2, 2.3, Evropska prostovoljna služba za skupine ter Sodelovanje med civilnimi in prostovoljnimi službami).
Local and cultural traditions should not be overlooked, and for example, predetermined age-limits and educational requirements should not dictate access to these measures (i.e. actions 2.2, 2.3, European Voluntary Service for groups and Cooperation between civil and volunteer services, respectively).
Prav tako se ne sme preveč usmerjati projektov iz dejavnosti 4 (Mladi delavci in podporni sistemi).
Likewise, projects under Action 4 (Youth workers and support systems), should not be overly directed from above.
Namesto tega je treba spodbujati osnovno raven strokovnega znanja v dejavnostih mladih v državah članicah in tudi že uveljavljene izvajalce, kot je Evropski forum mladih, da bi prevzeli vodstvo pri določanju koristnih in primernih projektov.
Instead, grassroots-level expertise in youth activities in Member States as well as established practitioners such as the European Youth Forum should be encouraged to take the lead in designating worthwhile and suitable projects.
V zvezi z vlogo še zlasti žensk se upa, da projekti, ki jih financira program Mladi v akciji, spodbujajo temeljit sodoben in spodbuden pogled.
Regarding the role of women in particular, it is to be hoped that projects financed under Youth in Action promote a thoroughly modern and empowering outlook.