natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nove države članice v skladu z aktom o pristopu izvajajo schengenski pravni red v dveh fazah: od pristopa uporabljajo določbe iz kategorije I, določbe iz kategorije II pa bodo uporabljale od datuma, ki ga bo določil Svet.
As regards the new Member States, according to the Act of Accession, they implement the Schengen acquis in two phases: they apply the category I provisions as from accession, while the category II provisions will only be applied from a date to be determined by the Council.
Nove države članice morajo zato sedaj uporabljati Uredbo (ES) 539/2001
As a result, the new Member States currently have to apply the EC Regulation 539/2001
Te države ne morejo priznavati kot enakovredne njihovim nacionalnim vizumom dokumentov, ki jih izdajajo schengenske države ali druge nove države članice.
These countries cannot recognise as equivalent to their national visas the documents issued by Schengen States or by other new Member States.
Zahtevati morajo svoje nacionalne vizume, čeprav zadevne osebe že imajo schengensko dovoljenje za prebivanje ali vizum.
They are obliged to require their own national visas even if the persons concerned already hold a Schengen residence permit or visa.
Nekatere nove države članice pa v praksi priznavajo dokumente, ki jih izdajajo schengenske države za tranzit in kratkoročno bivanje, z dvostranskimi sporazumi ali enostranskimi državnimi odločitvami.
However, some of the new Member States do recognise in practice the documents issued by the Schengen States for transit and short-stay purposes, through bilateral agreements or unilateral national decisions.
Tako priznavanje ni združljivo z zakonodajo EU in se mora urediti v najkrajšem možnem času.
Such recognition is incompatible with EU law and thus the situation must be regulated as soon as possible.
Praktična primera:
Practical examples:
- Državljan države, naštete v Prilogi I Uredbe 539/2001 (na primer Bosne in Hercegovine, Srbije in Črne gore, Rusije, Turčije, Ukrajine, Moldavije itd) ima francosko dovoljenje za prebivanje.
- A citizen of a country listed in the Annex 1 of the Regulation 539/2001 (e.g. Bosnia and Herzegovina , Serbia - Montenegro , Russia , Turkey , Ukraine , Moldova , etc) holds a French residence permit.
Namerava potovati po kopnem v svojo izvorno državo, ki zahteva tranzit čez več držav.
He intends to travel by land to his country of origin, which entails transit through several countries.
Ne potrebuje nobenega vizuma za schengenske države, če te države priznavajo njegovo francosko dovoljenje za prebivanje, potrebuje pa nacionalni vizum za vsako novo državo članico, skozi katero potuje.
He does not need any visa for the Schengen Countries since these countries recognise his French residence permit but he needs a national visa for each one of the new Member States he goes through.
- Državljan države, naštete v Prilogi I Uredbe 539/2001 želi obiskati Nemčijo z avtomobilom, kar zahteva tranzit čez nekaj držav.
- A citizen of a country listed in the Annex 1 of the Regulation 539/2001 would like to visit Germany by car, which entails transit through several countries.
Če je pridobil nemški vizum, ne potrebuje drugega vizuma za schengenske države, potrebuje pa nacionalni vizum vsake nove države članice, skozi katero potuje.
As he obtained a German visa, he does not need another visa for the Schengen countries, but he needs a national visa for each one of the new Member States he transits.
Vsebina predloga
Content of the proposal
Ta predlog bo državam članicam omogočal poenostavitev kontrole na zunanjih mejah z enostranskim priznavanjem nekaterih dokumentov, ki jih izdajajo:
The present proposal will allow new Member States to simplify the control at the external borders by unilaterally recognising certain documents issued by:
- schengenske države članice, vključno z Norveško, Islandijo in Dansko, ki so pridružene schengenskemu pravnemu redu in ki ta pravni red polno izvajajo
- Schengen Member States, including Norway, Iceland and Danemark, that are associated to the Schengen acquis and fully implementing this acquis ,
- in druge nove države članice,
- other new Member States
kot enakovredne svojim nacionalnim vizumom.
as equivalent to their national visa.
Poenostavljen režim velja za naslednje dokumente :
This simplified regime should apply to the following documents :
- enotni vizum, izdan v schengenski državi članici, ki je v skladu s Skupnimi konzularnimi navodili (tranzit, kratkoročno bivanje ali potovanje, skupinski vizum);
- the uniform visas issued by a Schengen State in compliance with the Common Consular instructions (transit, short-stay or travel, group visa);
- nacionalni vizum za daljše bivanje, izdan v schengenski državi v skladu z njeno nacionalno zakonodajo;
- the national long stay visas issued by a Schengen State according to its national legislation;
- dovoljenje za prebivanje, izdano v schengenski državi;
- the residence permits issued by a Schengen State;
- nacionalne vizume za kratkoročno bivanje, vizume za daljše bivanje in dovoljenja za prebivanje, ki jih izdajo druge nove države članice.
- the national short term, long term visas and residence permits issued by another new Member State.
Za celovit pristop ne moremo priznati samo nekaterih dokumentov in hkrati ne priznati drugih.
In order to avoid a fragmentary approach, it is deemed impossible to recognise some documents whilst not recognising others.
Za tiste nove države članice, ki so se odločile za izvajanje tega sklepa, se vsi omenjeni dokumenti priznavajo kot enakovredni njihovim nacionalnim vizumom.
Thus, all the abovementioned documents will be recognised as equivalent to the national visas of those new Member States which choose to implement this Decision.
Priznanje dokumenta za namene tranzita mora biti omejeno na namen tranzita, ne da bi to posegalo v možnost novih držav članic, da izdajajo nacionalne vizume za kratkoročno bivanje.
The recognition of a document should be limited to the purpose of transit , without affecting the possibility of new Member States to issue national visas for short term stay.
Omejitev je potrebna zato, da se izognemo zmešnjavi pravil schengenskega pravnega reda o državi, pristojni za prošnje za vizum.
Such a limitation is necessary in order to avoid any risk of confusion of the current Schengen rules on the state responsible for a visa application.
Trajanje obdobja prehoda ne sme presegati petih dni - upoštevajo se obstoječa pravila o tranzitnem vizumu iz Skupnih konzularnih navodil in geografski položaj novih držav članic.
The duration of the transit period may not exceed five days - this takes into account the existing rules on transit visasof the Common Consular Instructions and the geographical situation of new Member States.
Režim ne velja za prehodno obdobje , dokler nove države članice ne bodo izvajale schengenskega pravnega reda.
This regime should only apply for a transitional period , until such a time as the new Member States will fully implement the Schengen acquis.
Ko se država odloči za izvajanje sklepa, tega (zato, da ne bi zapletali režima) ne more več spremeniti.
Once a country decides to apply the decision, there will not be any possibility to suspend it, in order not to complicate the regime.
Predlagani sklep je namenjen novim državam članicam, sodelovanje v tem režimu pa je neobvezno , da jim ne bi nalagali dodatnih obveznosti, kakor je opredeljeno v aktu o pristopu iz leta 2003.
The proposed decision is addressed to the new Member States but their participation in this regime is optional , in order not to impose upon them additional obligations to those as defined by the 2003 Act of Accession.
Nove države članice imajo možnost, da uporabljajo novi instrument ali da nadaljujejo z izdajanjem nacionalnih vizumov.
New Member States have the possibility either to implement the new instrument or to continue issuing national visas.
Če se nove države članice odločijo za poenostavljeni režim, bodo morale sprejeti dokumente, ki so jih izdale države članice, ki polno izvajajo schengenski pravni red, in ne bo razlike med njimi.
Should they opt for the simplified regime, new Member States will have to accept documents issued by all the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis , without any distinction between them.
Ko bodo ti dokumenti priznani, bodo imele nove države članice tudi možnost za priznanje dokumentov, ki so jih izdale druge nove države članice.
Once these documents are recognised, the new Member States also have the possibility to recognise the documents issued by the other new Member States.
Nove države članice obvestijo Komisijo v 10 delovnih dneh od začetka veljavnosti te odločbe, če jo nameravajo uporabljati.
The new Member States shall notify the Commission within 10 working days of the entry into force of this Decision if they decide to opt in.
Odločitve naknadno ne bo več mogoče spreminjati.
There will not be any possibility to opt in at a later stage.
Posledice za posamezne protokole, priložene Pogodbi in za pridružene države
Consequences in relation to the various protocols annexed to the Treaty and to the associated states
Predlagani sklep se nanaša samo na nove države članice in zato ne vpliva na položaj Združenega kraljestva, Irske in Danske.
The proposed Decision is addressed exclusively to new Member States and therefore does not affect the position of the United Kingdom , Ireland and Denmark .
Tudi Norveška in Irska , čeprav se sklep na nanaša na njiju in ni vključen v razvoj schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu sporazuma držav, ki so ga podpisale s Svetom, morata v ta sklep vključiti vizume in dovoljenja za prebivanje, ki sta jih izdali.
As regards Norway and Iceland , although this Decision is not addressed to them and does not constitute a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the agreement these countries signed with the Council, it is necessary to include visas and residence permits delivered by these countries in the present decision.
Nove države članice bodo tako imele možnost za enostransko priznavanje teh dokumentov.
The new Member States will then have the possibility to unilaterally recognise these documents.
Mnenje poročevalca
Opinion of the Rapporteur
Pravni red EU se je glede notranjih in zunanjih meja široko razvil.
The EU acquis relating to the internal and external borders is currently being extensively developed.
Obstoječi predlog je zadnji prispevek k razvijajočemu se pravnemu redu.
The present proposal is the latest contribution in an on-going development of the acquis .
V razvoj na drugih področjih pa sodijo: direktiva iz leta 2004 o pravici državljanov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic, kodeks o schengenskih mejah, ki sta ga sprejela Parlament in Svet junija 2005, agencija za zunanje meje, ki je bila uradno potrjena junija 2005, nedavna uredba o lokalnem čezmejnem prometu in o zunanjih kopenskih mejah držav članic.
Other developments include: the Directive of 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, the Schengen Borders Control Code approved by the Parliament and the Council in June 2005, the External Border Agency formally inaugurated in June 2005, the very recent Regulation concerning the local border traffic at the external land borders of the Member States.
Predlog je želja EU po enostavni, enotni vizumski politiki.
This proposal is an example of the EU's desire to have a simpler, uniform visa policy.
S tem v zvezi poročevalec spodbuja Komisijo, naj poišče nadaljnje načine za spodbujanje poenostavitve postopkov in vzajemnosti, ki sodi v njene odnose s tretjimi državami in njeno splošno vizumsko politiko.
In this context, the Rapporteur encourages the Commission to look into further ways of enhancing simplification of procedures and reciprocity as part of its relations with third countries and of its general visa policy.
Poročevalec pozdravlja obstoječi predlog, ki daje odgovor na pereče probleme, ki izhajajo iz položaja, v katerem nove države članice ne morejo priznavati vizumov in dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki so jih izdale druge države članice ter morajo izdajati nacionalne vizume državljanom tretjih držav za namene tranzita.
The Rapporteur welcomes the present proposal which brings a response to the very acute issues which have arisen from the situation whereby the new Member States cannot recognise visas and residence permits issued by the other Member States and have to issue national visas to some third countries citizens for transit purposes.
Po eni strani ta položaj pomeni veliko administrativno breme za konzularna predstavništva novih držav članic v schengenskih državah in v novih državah članicah.
On one hand, this situation implies a huge administrative burden for the new Member States’ Consular offices in the Schengen States and in the new Member States.
Pred prazniki ta predstavništva obravnavajo na tisoče prošenj za vizume, ki se morajo rešiti pravočasno.
Before the holiday periods, these Consulates have to deal with thousands of applications for visas that they have to treat in a timely manner.
To pomeni visoke stroške, sodobne storitve in veliko zaposlenih, ki je še posebej zahtevno za geografsko majhne tranzitne države.
This implies huge costs, modern services and a lot of personnel, which is particularly demanding for geographically small countries of transit.
Po drugi strani je ta režim vprašljiv zaradi neutemeljenih birokratskih postopkov in stroškov, ki jih nosijo državljani tretjih držav.
On the other hand, the current regime is questionable because of the unjustified bureaucratic procedures and costs they imply for third countries citizens.
Če nameravajo potovati po kopnem, potrebujejo tranzitni vizum za vsako državo, skozi katero potujejo.
When they intend to travel by land, for each one of the new Member States they pass through, these citizens need a transit visa.
To je počasen, odvračilen in včasih ponižujoč postopek: nekaj spisov s prošnjami, obrazci za izpolnjevanje, fotografijami, potrdili, kot so zdravstveno in avtomobilsko zavarovanje, rezervacija hotela, potrdilo o preživljanju, bančna potrdila itd.
This means a lengthy, dissuasive and sometimes humiliating process: several dossiers of application, with forms to fill in, photographs, supporting documents such as medical and car insurance, hotel reservation, proofs of subsistence, bank statements, etc.
Plačati morajo vizume, potovanje v mesto, kjer je sedež predstavništva in čakati v vrsti.
They have to pay for the visas, travel to the city where the consulates are located and they have to queue in front of them.
Ta režim tudi negativno vpliva na družino in kulturne vezi , ker državljanom tretjih držav, ki prebivajo v schengenskih državah lahko omejuje dostop do njihove domovine.
This regime has also a negative effect on family and cultural ties , since in the case of third country nationals residing in Schengen states it can restrict the access to their homeland.
Ta položaj je še bolj nedopusten, ker so osebe, ki ne predstavljajo nobenega tveganja za nezakonito priseljevanje ali ogrožanje javnega reda, preden pridobijo schengenski vizum, dovoljenje za prebivanje ali nacionalni vizum, podvržene številnim strogim kontrolam in pregledom schengenskih držav ali drugih novih držav članic.
All this situation is even more difficult to tolerate since the persons concerned do not represent any risk of illegal immigration or any threat to public policy as they have been submitted to several controls and screening either by a Schengen State or by another new Member State before the issuing of the Schengen visa, residence permit or the national visa.
- imeti morajo veljavne potne listine za prehod meje,
- possession of valid travel documents allowing to cross the border,
- dokumente, ki dokazujejo namen in pogoje bivanja ter zadostna sredstva za preživljanje,
- documents justifying the purpose and conditions of the intended stay and the sufficiency of the means of subsistence,
- za njimi ne sme biti razpisan ukrep tajne obveščevalne službe za namene zavrnitve vstopa,
- absence of an alert in the SIS for the purposes of refusing entry,
- ne smejo ogrožati javnega reda, notranje varnosti, javnega zdravja ali mednarodnih odnosov katere koli od schengenskih držav članic.
- lack of being considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of any of the Schengen Member States.
Zaradi vseh teh razlogov je pomembno in nujno sprejetje tega sklepa, ki bo novim državam članicam omogočal odločanje za enostransko priznavanje vizumov in dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki jih izdajo države članice, ki polno izvajajo schengenski pravni red, vključno z Norveško, Islandijo in Dansko ter drugimi novimi državami članicami.
For all these reasons, it is now crucial and urgent to adopt this Decision allowing the new Member States to opt in for the unilateral recognition of the visas and residence permits issued by the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis including Norway, Iceland and Denmark and by other new Member States.
Sklep ne bo koristen le za deset novih držav članic, ampak tudi ob vstopu Romunije in Bolgarije v EU.
This Decision will not only be useful for the ten new Member States, but it will also operate when Romania and Bulgaria join EU.
Predlog Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi poenostavljenega režima kontrole oseb na zunanjih mejah na podlagi enostranskega priznanja nekaterih dokumentov s strani Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške kot enakovrednih njihovim nacionalnim vizumom za namene tranzita preko njihovih ozemelj
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas for the purposes of transit through their territories
o delu Skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU v letu 2005
on the work of the ACP‑EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly in 2005
– ob upoštevanju partnerskega sporazuma med člani afriških, karibskih in pacifiških skupin držav (AKP) na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, ki je bil podpisan v Cotonouju 23. junija 2000 (Sporazum iz Cotonouja)
– having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States, of the one part, and the Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (Cotonou Agreement)
3. , in dopolnjen v Luksemburgu 25. junija 2005,
3. and amended in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005,
– ob upoštevanju resolucij in deklaracije, ki jih je podpisala Skupna parlamentarna skupščina med svojim 9. zasedanjem v Bamaku (Mali) od 16. do 21. aprila 2005
– having regard to the resolutions and the declaration adopted by the JPA at its ninth session in Bamako (Mali), from 16 to 21 April 2005
- napredku, doseženem v okviru razvojnih ciljev tisočletja na področju splošnega osnovnošolskega izobraževanja in enakosti spolov v državah AKP,
- progress made in achieving universal primary education and gender equality in the ACP countries in the context of the Millennium Development Goals,
- povojni sanaciji v državah AKP,
- post-conflict rehabilitation in ACP countries,
- vključitvi Evropskega razvojnega sklada v proračun
- budgetisation of the European Development Fund,
- razmerah v Sudanu,
- the situation in Sudan,
- razmerah na področju afriških Velikih jezer,
- the situation in the African Great Lakes Region,
- deklaraciji iz Bamaka o razvojnih ciljih tisočletja,
- the Bamako Declaration on the Millennium Development Goals,
– ob upoštevanju odziva Komisije na zgoraj omenjene resolucije Skupne parlamentarne skupščine, sprejete v Bamaku (Mali) 21. aprila 2005,
– having regard to the Commission follow‑up to the above JPA resolutions adopted in Bamako (Mali) on 21 April 2005,
– ob upoštevanju resolucij, ki jih je Skupna parlamentarna skupščina sprejela na 10. zasedanju v Edinburgu (Združeno Kraljestvo) med 19. in 24. novembrom 2005
– having regard to the resolutions adopted by the JPA at its 10th session in Edinburgh (United Kingdom), from 19 to 24 November 2005
Še neobjavljeno v UL. o:
Not yet published in the OJ. , on:
- vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov pri izvajanju Partnerskega sporazuma iz Cotonouja,
- the role of national parliaments in implementing the Cotonou partnership agreement,
- kmetijskih in rudarskih proizvodih,
- agricultural and mining commodities,
- vzrokih in posledicah naravnih nesreč,
- causes and consequences of natural disasters,
- registraciji, ocenjevanju in odobritvi kemikalij (REACH).
- registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals (REACH),
- razmerah v Zahodni Afriki,
- the situation in West Africa,
– ob upoštevanju odziva Evropske komisije na resolucije Skupne parlamentarne skupščine, sprejete v Haagu (Nizozemska) 25. novembra 2004, ki se nanašajo na:
– having regard to the Commission follow‑up to the JPA resolutions adopted in The Hague (Netherlands) on 25 November 2004 on:
- politični dialog AKP-EU (člen 8 Sporazuma iz Cotonouja),
- political dialogue (Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement),
- pomoč v hrani in zanesljivo preskrbo s hrano,
- food aid and food security,
- razmere v Darfurju,
- the situation in Darfur,
- škodo, ki so jo povzročili orkani na Karibih,
- damage caused by cyclones in the Caribbean region,
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije sopredsednic Skupne parlamentarne skupščine Sharon Hay in Glenys Kinnock o dogodkih v Togu po izginotju predsednika Gnassingbéja Eyadémaja 5. februarja 2005,
– having regard to the statement by the Co-Presidents of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, Ms Sharon Hay Webster and Ms Glenys Kinnock, on the events in Togo following the death of President Gnassingbé Eyadéma on 5 February 2005,
– ob upoštevanju pisma Svetovnega programa za prehrano dne 3. marca 2005, naslovljenega na Skupno parlamentarno skupščino,
– having regard to the letter of 3 March 2005 from the World Food Programme to the JPA,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Ženskega foruma Skupne parlamentarne skupščine dne 16. aprila 2005 v Bamaku (Mali) o pohabljanju ženskih spolnih organov,
– having regard to the conclusions of the JPA Women’s Forum of 16 April 2005 in Bamako (Mali) on female genital mutilation,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila generalnega sekretarja Organizacije združenih narodov Kofija Annana dne 18. aprila 2005 ob 9. zasedanju Skupne parlamentarne skupščine v Bamaku (Mali),
– having regard to the message from the Secretary‑General of the United Nations, Mr Kofi Annan, of 18 April 2005, on the occasion of the ninth session of the JPA,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Ženskega foruma Skupne parlamentarne skupščine dne 19. novembra v Edinburgu o trgovini z ljudmi,
– having regard to the conclusions of the JPA Women’s Forum of 19 November 2005 in Edinburgh (United Kingdom) on human trafficking,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj ( A6‑0063/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0063/2006 ),
A. zaradi pozitivnega zaključka pogajanj o reviziji Sporazuma iz Cotonouja iz leta 2005 in novih določb, ki se nanašajo še posebej na krepitev političnega dialoga, krepitev parlamentov, na Mednarodno kazensko sodišče in na sodelovanje v boju proti terorizmu in orožju za množično uničevanje,
A. having regard to the conclusion to the negotiations on the revision of the Cotonou Agreement in 2005 and the new measures concerning in particular the strengthening of political dialogue, the strengthening of parliaments, the International Criminal Court and cooperation in the fight against terrorism and weapons of mass destruction,
B. zaradi dejstva, da lahko Skupno parlamentarno skupščino (SPS) štejemo za zgled na področju sodelovanja in razvoja, in ker je njen prispevek k odprtemu dialogu in enakim pravicam med severom in jugom izjemnega pomena,
B. whereas the JPA stands as a model of cooperation and development in the world and is making a major contribution to open, fair dialogue between North and South,