natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V treh letih po začetku veljavnosti tega sklepa in vsaka tri leta po tem Upravni odbor naroči neodvisno zunanje ocenjevanje izvajanja tega sklepa in tudi dejavnosti CEPOLA.
Within three years after this Decision takes effect and every three years thereafter, the Governing Board shall commission an independent external evaluation of the implementation of this Decision as well as of the activities carried out by CEPOL.
Člen 22 a (novo)
Article 22 a (new)
Evropska policijska akademija, ustanovljena s tem sklepom, je naslednica Evropske policijske akademije, ustanovljene s Sklepom 2000/820/PNZ, ter pred datumom začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa se zagotovi neprekinjenost upravnih in pravnih postopkov.
The European Police College established by this Decision shall be the successor to the European Police College established by Decision 2000/820/JHA, and continuity in administrative and legal procedures commenced prior to the date on which this Decision takes effect shall be ensured.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropske policijske akademije (CEPOL) kot organa Evropske unije
on the proposal for a Council decision on establishing the European Police College (CEPOL) as a body of the European Union
Odbor za proračun poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Odstavek 1 a (novo)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija
Text proposted by the Commission
Parlament in Svet sta se v okviru Finančne uredbe iz leta 2002 sporazumela, da mora država članica gostiteljica sodelovati pri vzpostavljanju novih organov na svojem ozemlju.
In the context of the 2002 Financial Regulation, Parliament and the Council agreed that the host Member States should participate in the installation of new bodies on their territories.
Proračunski organ mora biti o teh odstopanjih obveščen.
The budgetary authority shall be informed about these derogations.
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropske policijske akademije (CEPOL) kot organa Evropske unije
Proposal for a Council decision on establishing the European Police College (CEPOL) as a body of the European Union
Odbor(-i), zaprošeni za mnenje
Committee asked for its opinion
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropske policijske akademije (CEPOL) kot organa Evropske unije
Proposal for a Council Decision establishing the European Police College (CEPOL) as a body of the European Union
Člen 39(1) EU
Article 39(1) EU
člena 93 in 51
Rules 93and 51
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju finančnega instrumenta za razvojno in gospodarsko sodelovanje
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation and economic cooperation
David Martin , Odbor za mednarodno trgovino
David Martin , Committee on International Trade
(*) Okrepljeno sodelovanje med odbori - člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Enhanced cooperation between committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE ODBORA ZA ZUNANJE ZADEVE.........................................................................11
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS.................................................11
MNENJE ODBORA ZA MEDNARODNO TRGOVINO(*)....................................................14
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE (*)................................14
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUN.....................................................................................17
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS.................................................................17
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0629 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0629 )
Še neobjavljeno v UL. ,
Not yet published in OJ.. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 179(1) in 181a(2) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0128/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 179(1) and 181a(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0128/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj in mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve, Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in Odbora za proračun( A6‑0060/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Budgets, ( A6‑0060/2005 ),
MNENJE ODBORA ZA ZUNANJE ZADEVE
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS
za Odbor za razvoj
for the Committee on Development
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi finančnega instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje in gospodarsko sodelovanje
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation and economic cooperation
Po temeljiti obravnavi predloga Komisije za uredbo o vzpostavitvi finančnega instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje in gospodarsko sodelovanje je pripravljavec osnutka prisiljen zaključiti, da je predlog v sedanji obliki nesprejemljiv.
After a careful consideration of the Commission's Proposal for a Regulation establishing a financing instrument for development co-operation and economic co-operation, the draftsman is forced to conclude that the proposal in its present form is unacceptable.
Številne ideje, ki jih vsebuje predlog Komisije, so precej zanimive in bi lahko, če bi bile primerno izvedene, dopustile novo dinamiko in zagotovile veliko bolj konkretne rezultate za politiko zunanjih ukrepov EU; kot takšne bodo deležne primerne razprave pozneje.
A number of the ideas contained in the Commission proposal are of considerable interest and, if properly implemented, could grant a new dynamism and provide far more concrete results for the EU's external action policy, and as such they will deserve a proper debate at a later time.
Vendar zaradi znatne erozije pristojnosti Parlamenta kot posledice sprejetja navedenega predlaganega instrumenta poročevalec priporoča, da odbor glasuje proti predlogu, izrecno zaradi naslednjih razlogov:
However, because of the substantial erosion of Parliament's powers that would result from the adoption of the proposed instrument as it stands, the rapporteur recommends that the committee vote against the proposal, specifically for the following reasons:
Komisija predlaga „nov okvir za načrtovanje in pomoč pri izvedbi ... da bi bila zunanja pomoč Skupnosti bolj učinkovita“, in predstavlja več novih finančnih instrumentov, da bi to izvedla.
The Commission is proposing "a new framework for planning and delivery assistance ..... in order to make the Community's external assistance more effective", and is presenting several new financial instruments to do this.
Vendar je jasno, da se morajo štiri nove uredbe o zunanjih finančnih instrumentih razumeti in obravnavati kot del paketa.
It is clear, however, that the four new regulations on external financial instruments have to be seen and treated as part of a package.
Odbor za zunanje zadeve priznava pomembnost predvidenega racionaliziranega/prečiščenega pristopa, da bo zunanja pomoč lahko bolj usklajena.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs recognises the importance of having in place a rationalised/consolidated approach so that external assistance can be better co-ordinated.
Vendar tudi opozarja na dejstvo, da bi predlagani instrumenti spodkopali vlogo Parlamenta pri določanju politike.
However, it also draws attention to the fact that the instruments, as proposed, would erode Parliament's policy-making role very considerably.
Rezultat bi bil, da Parlament ne bi mogel več opravljati svoje demokratične vloge v postopku določanja politike dodeljevanja denarne podpore posebnim programom.
The result would be that Parliament would no longer be able to exercise its democratic role in the policy-making procedure of allocating funding to specific programmes.
Nujno je, da Evropski parlament lahko izvaja pristojnosti, ki so mu podeljene s pogodbami, in tako zagotavlja nove finančne instrumente z večjo legitimnostjo, demokratičnim nadzorom in preglednostjo.
It is imperative that the European Parliament be able to exercise the powers accorded it under the Treaties, thus providing any new financial instruments with enhanced legitimacy, democratic control and transparency.
Nadaljnja – in pomembna – zadeva je, da nove uredbe nimajo določene časovne razporeditve.
A further - and major - concern is that the new regulations are open-ended as regards timing.
Člen 26 predlagane uredbe, ki se tukaj pregleduje (finančni instrument za razvojno sodelovanje in gospodarsko sodelovanje) velja za možnost pregleda, toda opozoriti je treba, da je to zgolj možnost („Komisija do 31. decembra 2011 predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsak predlog v zvezi s prihodnostjo te uredbe in vsako spremembo, ki bi lahko bila potrebna“).
Art. 26 of the proposed Regulation under examination here (the financing instrument for development co-operation and economic co-operation) refers to the possibility of a review, but it should be noted that this is only a possibility ("The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council by 31 December 2011 any proposals concerning the future of this Regulation and any amendments that may be necessary").
Potrebna je jasna specifikacija določenega obdobja uporabe uredbe, da bo Parlament lahko, ko poteče, polno sodeloval pri pregledu instrumentov.
What is needed is a clear specification of a fixed period of application for the regulation so that, when it expires, Parliament will be able to participate fully in a review of the instrument(s).
Ker je jasno, da zgoraj omenjeni elementi še zdaleč niso zadovoljivi, Odbor za zunanje zadeve predlaga, da se odobri položaj glavnega odbora, Odbora za razvoj, in priporoča, da Parlament zavrne predlog Komisije.
As the above elements are clearly far from satisfactory, the Committee on Foreign Affairs proposes to endorse the position of the lead committee, the Committee on Development, and recommend that Parliament reject the Commission proposal.
Hkrati poziva Komisijo, da nemudoma ponovno pregleda celoten „paket“ in povsem upošteva zadržke Parlamenta.
At the same time, it calls on the Commission to re-examine the entire "package" without delay, and to take full account of Parliament's concerns.
Zakonodajni predlog
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL
Odbor za zunanje zadeve priporoča, da se predlog Komisije zavrne.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs recommends that the Commission proposal be rejected.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju finančnega instrumenta za razvojno in gospodarsko sodelovanje
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation and economic cooperation
Po natančni preučitvi Predloga Komisije o oblikovanju finančnega instrumenta za razvojno in gospodarsko sodelovanje, mora pripravljavec mnenja zaradi občutne oslabitve pristojnosti Parlamenta, do katere bi prišlo s sprejetjem predlaganega instrumenta, zaključiti, da je predlog v obstoječi obliki nesprejemljiv.
After careful consideration of the Commission's Proposal for a Regulation establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation and economic cooperation, the draftsman is forced to conclude that, because of the substantial erosion of Parliament's powers that would result from the adoption of the proposed instrument, the proposal in its present form is unacceptable.
Čeprav je splošni cilj poenostavitve in racionalizacije zakonodajnih instrumentov, ki se nanašajo na zunanjo politiko, dobrodošel, pripravljavec mnenja meni, da novi predlog Komisije resno posega v pristojnosti, ki jih v skladu s Pogodbami Parlament trenutno izvaja v okviru postopka soodločanja in letnih proračunskih postopkov.
While welcoming the overall objective of simplifying and rationalising the legislative instruments relating to external policy, the draftsman believes that the new Commission proposal seriously impinges on the powers currently exercised by Parliament in conformity with the Treaties under the co-decision and the annual budgetary procedures.
Štirje novi predlogi za instrumente zunanjega financiranja, ki v skladu z razlago Komisije predstavljajo paket, občutno omejujejo vlogo Parlamenta.
The four new proposals on external financial instruments which, according to the very logic of the Commission, should be understood as a package, curb Parliament's role very considerably.
Instrumenti v obstoječi obliki Parlamentu onemogočajo izvajanje svoje demokratične vloge v postopku oblikovanja politike dodeljevanja sredstev konkretnim programom.
In their current form, the new instruments prevent Parliament from exercising its democratic role in the policy-making procedure of allocating funds to concrete programmes.
Poleg tega so v primerjavi z nekdanjo in sedanjo prakso nove uredbe odprtega tipa in bi Parlamentu onemogočile sodelovanje v prihodnjih ocenah instrumentov.
Moreover, compared with past and standard practice, the new regulations are open-ended and would therefore prevent Parliament from participating in future reviews of the instruments.
Parlament bi moral ohraniti možnost polnega rednega sodoločanja ciljev, obsega in metod, ki bodo uporabljene v različnih instrumentih.
Parliament should maintain the possibility of fully co-determining, on a regular basis, the objectives, scope and methods to be employed by the different instruments.
Zato je potrebno točno opredeliti obdobje izvajanja.
A fixed period of application is therefore needed.
Na kratko, da bi poskrbeli za večjo učinkovitost zunanje pomoči Skupnosti, mora Evropski parlament obvezno ohraniti pooblastila, ki so mu bila dodeljena s Pogodbami, s čimer bi novim instrumentom zagotovil legitimnost, demokratični nadzor in preglednost.
It is, in short, imperative that, in order to make the Community's external assistance more effective, the European Parliament continues to be able to exercise the powers that have been accorded to it by the Treaties, thus providing the new financial instruments with enhanced legitimacy, democratic control and transparency.
Na podlagi teh razlogov Odbor za mednarodno trgovino predlaga zavrnitev predloga Komisije.
For all these reasons the Committee on International Trade proposes that the Commission proposal be rejected.
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj s Parlamentom takoj stori vse potrebno za posredovanje novega paketa finančnih instrumentov, v katerem bodo pomisleki Parlamenta upoštevani.
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Commission to take, without delay, appropriate steps together with Parliament to submit a new package of financial instruments that takes into account Parliament's concerns.
ZAKONODAJNI PREDLOG
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino priporoča zavrnitev predloga Komisije.
The Committee on International Trade recommends that the Commission proposal be rejected.
Daniel Caspary, Françoise Castex, Béla Glattfelder, Jacky Henin, Sajjad Karim, Caroline Lucas, Erika Mann, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Georgios Papastamkos, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Johan Van Hecke in Zbigniew Zaleski
Daniel Caspary, Françoise Castex, Béla Glattfelder, Jacky Henin, Sajjad Karim, Caroline Lucas, Erika Mann, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Georgios Papastamkos, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Johan Van Hecke and Zbigniew Zaleski
Jorgo Chatzimarkakis in Pierre Jonckheer
Jorgo Chatzimarkakis and Pierre Jonckheer
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju finančnega instrumenta za razvojno in gospodarsko sodelovanje
on the proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the Council establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation and economic cooperation
Odbor za proračun predlaga zavrnitev predloga Komisije.
The Committee on Budgets recommends that the Commission proposal be rejected.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju finančnega instrumenta za razvojno in gospodarsko sodelovanje
Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the Council establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation and economic cooperation
Pripravljavec osnutka Datum imenovanja
Draftsman Date appointed
Člen 251(2), 179(1) in 181A(2) ES
Articles 251(2), 179(1) and 181A(2) EC
Gay Mitchell6.10.2004
Gay Mitchell 6.10.2004
člen 43(1) / člen 43(2) 0.0.0000
Rule 43(1) / Rule 43(2) 0.0.0000
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA......................4
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION..........................................5
MINORITY OPINION.............................................................................................................44
MINORITY OPINION..................................................................................................................52
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................46
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ....................53
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................57
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ........63
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( COM(2003)0550 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0550 )
Še ni objavljeno v UL. ,
Not yet published in OJ ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 175 (1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija predlog poslala Parlamentu ( C5‑0447/2003 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5‑0447/2003 ),
– ob upoštevanju pravila 51 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko in Odbora za kmetijstvo ( A6‑0061/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Agriculture (A6‑0000/2004),
Pooblašča predsednika, da posreduje svoje mnenje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podzemne vode pred kemičnim onesnaževanjem in poslabšanjem
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against chemical pollution and deterioration
Nova Direktiva presega področje člena 17 Direktive 2000/60/ES in vsebuje določbe v zvezi s prehodom z dosežkov in ohranjanjem teh dosežkov v skladu z Direktivo80/68/EGS o podzemni vodi, ki preneha veljati najpozneje leta 2013, s ciljem preprečevanja ali omejevanja vnosa nevarnih snovi.
The new Directive goes beyond the scope of Article 17 of Directive 2000/60/EC and also contains provisions concerning the transition from and the preservation of the achievements made under the groundwater Directive 80/68/EEC, which expires by 2013 at the latest, with the aim of preventing or restricting input of hazardous substances.
Cilj poleg tega ni samo preprečevanje onesnaženja, ampak zlasti poslabšanja podzemne vode, ki ga povzroča nadaljnje odvajanje.
In addition, the aim is also to prevent not only the pollution but, in particular, the deterioration of groundwater caused by further discharges.
(1) Podzemna voda je pomemben naravni vir, ki bi ga bilo treba kot takega zaščititi pred onesnaženjem.
(1) Groundwater is a valuable natural resource which should be protected from pollution in its own right.
(1) Podzemna voda je pomemben naravni vir, ki ga je treba kot takega zaščititi pred poslabšanjem in kemičnim onesnaženjem.
(1) Groundwater is a valuable natural resource which must be protected from deterioration and chemical pollution in its own right.
To je zlasti pomembno za ekosisteme, ki so odvisni od podzemne vode in za uporabo podzemne vode pri vodni oskrbi za prehrano ljudi.
This is particularly important for groundwater dependent ecosystems and for the use of groundwater in the water supply for human consumption.
V novi direktivi o podzemni vodi je treba v celoti upoštevati okvirno direktivo 80/68/EGS, da bi zagotovili previdnostno ureditev na področju varstva podzemne vode in tako preprečili ali omejili poslabšanje podzemne vode z novimi vnosi.
The new Groundwater Directive must fully adopt the approach taken by the framework directive, 80/68/EEC, in order to safeguard the precautionary provisions of groundwater protection and thereby prevent or control any deterioration of groundwater as a result of new input.
Raba zveze „bi bilo treba“ je v primerjavi z angleškim izbirnim besedilom, kjer se uporablja „morati“, nepravilna.
'Should' is not correct when compared with the English original, which says 'must'.
To je treba pregledati tudi v nadaljnjem besedilu in v drugih besedili.
This should also be checked in the rest of the text and in the other language versions.
(1a) Podzemna voda mora biti zaščitena tako, da je mogoča zagotovitev pitne vode dobre kakovosti s preprostim prečiščevanjem, kot je določeno v ciljih iz člena 7(2) in (3) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
(1a) Groundwater must be protected in such a way that good quality drinking water can be achieved by simple purification, as specified in the objectives set out in Article 7(2) and (3) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
(2a) Podzemna voda je najobčutljivejše in največje nahajališče sladke vode v EU, predvsem pa je glavni vir javnega vodooskrbnega sistema.
(2a) Groundwater is the most sensitive and the largest body of freshwater in the EU and in particular also the primary source of public drinking water supply.
Raven varstva pri novih odvajanjih, emisijah in uhajanjih mora biti primerljiva vsaj z ravnijo za površinske vode v dobrem kemijskem stanju.
The level of protection against new discharges, emissions and losses must be at least comparable to that for surface water of good chemical status.
Onesnaženja ali poslabšanja pogosto povzročijo nepopravljivo škodo.
Pollution or deterioration frequently gives rise to irreversible damage.
(3) Z namenom varovanja okolja in zdravja ljudi bi bilo treba preprečiti, zmanjšati koncentracije škodljivih onesnaževal ali se jim izogniti.
(3) In order to protect the environment as a whole, and human health in particular, concentrations of harmful pollutants in groundwater should be avoided, prevented or reduced.
(3) Z namenom varovanja okolja in zdravja ljudi je treba preprečiti, zmanjšati škodljive koncentracije onesnaževal ali se jim izogniti.
(3) In order to protect the environment as a whole, and human health in particular, detrimental concentrations of pollutants in groundwater must be avoided, prevented or reduced.
(4) Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike vsebuje obširne določbe za varstvo in ohranitev podzemne vode.
(4) Council Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy sets out extensive provisions for the protection and conservation of groundwater.