natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Smernice za zaposlovanje 2005–2008 so resda namenjene vsem 25 državam članicam Evropske unije, vendar pa se s širitvijo poseben poudarek namenja nekaterim bistvenim točkam.
The guidelines for employment 2005–2008 are aimed at all 25 members of the European Union, but after enlargement certain fundamental points stand out.
Spodbujanje zaposlovanja mladih in starejših oseb (smernica 18) je bistveno za soočanje z demografskimi izzivi po vsej Evropi.
Encouraging young people and older people into employment (Guideline 18) is vital to respond to the demographic challenge throughout Europe.
Kljub temu je treba opozoriti, da je pričakovana življenjska doba bistveno nižja v nekaterih državah srednje in vzhodne Evrope.
It should be remembered, however, that life expectancy is considerably lower in some countries of Central and Eastern Europe.
Države članice morajo dati večji poudarek izboljšanju zdravstvenega stanja delavcev (smernica 21): smrtnost delavcev srednjih let je zaskrbljujoče visoka v nekaterih državah, kar ima občutne posledice na trgu dela.
Improving workers’ health (Guideline 21) should be given a higher profile in the Member States: the death rate of middle-aged workers is catastrophically high in some States, and this has significant implications for the job market.
Slabo zdravstveno stanje prebivalstva v nekaterih državah povzroča izčrpanost "rezerv delovne sile".
The poor state of health of the population in some countries leads to using up the ‘reserve stock’ of human capital.
Posebno pozornost je treba posvetiti zmanjšanju zaposlitev na črno v državah članicah (smernica 20), kjer je njihov delež večji kot v starih državah članicah.
Particular attention should be paid to reducing undeclared work in the new Member States (Guideline 20), where this is reaching higher rates than in the old Member States.
Poleg tega je treba odpraviti vse ovire, ki preprečujejo prost pretok evropskih delavcev (smernica 21).
Moreover, it is important to remove all obstacles to the free movement of European workers (Guideline 21).
Danes več držav članic – z izkoriščanjem možnosti, ki jo omogočajo pristopne pogodbe – omejuje število delavcev iz novih držav članic, medtem ko imajo od 23. januarja 2006 državljani tretjih držav, ki živijo v Evropski uniji več kot 5 let, neomejen dostop do zaposlitve v Uniji (Direktiva Sveta 2003/109/ES z dne 25. novembra 2003).
At present, several Member States, taking advantage of the possibility offered by the accession treaties, limit the number of migrant workers from the new Member States, while since 23 January 2006, third country nationals having lived in the EU for more than five years have unrestricted access to employment throughout the EU (Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003).
To ustvarja nenormalno stanje, v katerem imajo delavci iz tretjih držav večjo svobodo gibanja znotraj Unije kot tisti iz držav, ki so se ji nedavno pridružile.
This has created an anomalous situation in which third country workers have more freedom to move within the EU than those of the countries which have just joined.
Predlog Odločbe Sveta o smernicah za politike zaposlovanja držav članic
Proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
o skupnem besedilu, ki ga je odobril Spravni svet, o Uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določenih fluoriranih toplogrednih plinih
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3604/2006 – C6‑0065/2006 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3604/2006 – C6‑0065/2006 ),
450. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0492 )
450. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0492 )
Besedila, sprejeta 26.10.2005, P6_TA(2005)0400 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts Adopted , 26.10.2005, P6_TA(2005)0400 . on the Council common position
UL C 183 E, 26.7.2005, str.
OJ C 183 E, 26.7.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2005)0713 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2005)0713 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 65 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 65 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6‑0087/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0087/2006 ),
Splošni cilj predloga Komisije je bil prispevati k uresničevanju ciljev iz Kjotskega protokola z zmanjšanjem emisij fluoriranih toplogrednih plinov (f-plinov) s sprejetjem ukrepov za izboljšanje kakovosti okolja in z upoštevanjem delovanja notranjega trga.
The overall aim of the Commission proposal was to contribute to reaching the objectives set in the Kyoto Protocol by reducing emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases (f-gases) through adopting measures to both promote the quality of the environment, and take into account the functioning of the internal market.
31. marca 2004 je Parlament sprejel stališče v prvi obravnavi.
On 31 March 2004 Parliament adopted its position at first reading.
Parlament je drugo obravnavo uredbe zaključil 26. oktobra 2005 s sprejetjem 26 predlogov sprememb k skupnemu stališču Sveta.
The Parliament concluded its second reading on the Regulation on 26 October 2005 adopting 26 amendments to the Council's common position.
Ker Svet ni mogel sprejeti vseh teh predlogov, je bilo treba sklicati Spravni odbor.
The Council was unable to accept all these amendments, which meant that the Conciliation committee had to be convened.
Ustanovna seja delegacije Parlamenta v Spravnem odboru je bila 10. januarja 2006, njeni člani pa so Antoniosu Trakatellisu kot predsedniku delegacije, Karlu-Heinzu Florenzu kot predsedniku pristojnega odbora, Avrilu Doylu kot poročevalcu in Dorette Corbey kot poročevalki v senci podelili mandat za začetek neuradnih pogajanj s Svetom.
Parliament's delegation to the Conciliation Committee held its constituent meeting on 10 January 2006 and its members mandated the chair of the delegation, Mr Trakatellis, the chair of the committee responsible, Mr Florenz, the rapporteur, Mrs Doyle and shadow rapporteur, Mrs Corbey, to enter into informal negotiations with the Council.
Obravnavana so bila naslednja vprašanja: možnost, da države članice ohranijo ali uvedejo nacionalne ukrepe, ki so strožji od ukrepov, predvidenih z uredbo; tehnične določbe v zvezi z zadrževanjem fluoriranih plinov; poročanje in pregled uredbe; določitev dajanja v promet; čezmejni prevoz; označevanje; obveščanje o ukrepih, ki uvajajo nove prepovedi za fluorirane pline; usposabljanje in potrjevanje.
The issues at stake were the following: possibility for the Member States to keep or introduce national measures stricter than those foreseen by the Regulation; technical provisions regarding f-gas containment; reporting and review of the Regulation; definition of placing on the market; cross border transport; labelling; notification of measures introducing further bans of f-gases; training and certification.
Na neuradnem trialogu 17. januarja 2006 so bili doseženi predhodni dogovor o pogojih potrjevanja in usposabljanja, nekateri tehnični vidiki zmanjševanja emisij in nekaj sprememb v zvezi s poročanjem in revizijo.
During an informal trialogue, held on 17 January, a preliminary agreement on certification and training requirements, some technical aspects of containment and some of the amendments concerning reporting and review were reached.
Seja spravnega odbora je bila 31. januarja 2006 zvečer pod skupnim predsedstvom podpredsednika Antoniosa Trakatellisa in avstrijskega ministra za okolje Josefa Prölla ter v prisotnosti komisarja za okolje Stavrosa Dimasa.
The meeting of the Conciliation Committee was held on the evening of 31 January 2006 under the joint chairmanship of Mr Trakatellis, Vice-President, and Josef Pröll, Austrian Minister for Environment, and in the presence of Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas.
Razprava na seji se je osredotočala na vprašanja strožjih nacionalnih ukrepov, revizijske klavzule in označevanja.
The discussion at this meeting focused on the issues of stricter national measures, revision clause and labelling.
V zvezi z odprtimi vprašanji je bil dosežen dogovor.
An agreement covering outstanding issues was reached.
Ključne točke dogovora v spravnem postopku so povzete v naslednjih točkah.
The key points of the agreement in the conciliation procedure can be summarised as follows.
– Strožji nacionalni ukrepi
- Stricter national measures
Spravni odbor se je strinjal s splošnim načelom, da lahko države članice v skladu z določbami Pogodbe ohranijo ali uvedejo strožje nacionalne ukrepe.
The Conciliation Committee agreed on the general principle that Member States can maintain or introduce stricter national measures in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty.
Za poseben primer nacionalnih ukrepov, ki obstajajo na Danskem in v Avstriji in proti katerim je Komisija nameravala pravno ukrepati, je bila uvedena zaščitna klavzula, ki tema dvema državama članicama dovoljuje, da ohranita svoje pravne predpise do 31. decembra 2012.
On the specific case of the existing national measures in Denmark and Austria, against which the Commission has been considering legal action, a safeguard clause was introduced, which will allow the two Member States to keep their legislation until 31 December 2012.
– Revizijska klavzula
- Revision clause
V zvezi s sporazumom o nacionalnih ukrepih je Spravni odbor uvedel klavzulo, ki omogoča revizijo določb ob upoštevanju obstoječih ali prihodnjih mednarodnih obveznosti pri boju proti podnebnim spremembam.
In the context of the compromise on national measures, the conciliation Committee introduced a clause allowing for revision of the provisions in the light of existing or future international commitments to combat climate change
Spravni odbor je pristal na sporazumni predlog, po katerem je naprave, ki vsebujejo flurorirane pline, dovoljeno dati na trg le, če so jasno označeni z imeni in količino fluoriranih plinov, vsebovanih v pripomočku.
The Conciliation Committee agreed on a compromise foreseeing that appliances containing fluorinated gases can be placed on the market only if they bear a label clearly indicating the names of the fluorinated gases and the quantity contained in the appliance.
Morebitni okoljski vplivi plinov morajo biti navedeni tudi v navodilih za uporabo teh pripomočkov.
The instruction manuals accompanying the appliances must also indicate the potential environmental impact of the gases.
Delegacija Evropskega parlamenta je zadovoljna z doseženim dogovorom, saj je presegel pričakovanja po prvi in drugi obravnavi.
The European Parliament delegation is satisfied with the agreement reached, as it goes far beyond what was possible during the first and second readings.
Določbe v zvezi s strožjimi nacionalnimi ukrepi in označevanjem pomenijo bistveno izboljšavo glede na skupno stališče.
The provisions concerning stricter national measures and labelling represent a substantial improvement of the Common Position.
Skupno besedilo, ki ga je odobril Spravni svet, o Uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določenih fluoriranih toplogrednih plinih
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases
Člena 251(2) in 95 ES
Articles 251(2) and 95 EC
Člen 65
Rule 65
Predsednik delegacije: podpredsednik
Delegation chairman: Vice-President
Predsednik pristojnega odbora
Chairman of committee responsible
Datum 2. obravnave EP – P6
Date of Parliament’s 2nd reading – P6
Sporazum z izmenjavo pisem
Agreement by exchange of letters
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 2037/2000/ES glede izhodiščnega leta za dodelitev kvot delno halogeniranih klorofluoroogljikovodikov za države članice, ki so pristopile 1. maja 2004
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the base year for the allocation of quotas of hydrochlorofluorocarbons with respect to the Member States that acceded on 1 May 2004
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0550 - 13632/2005)
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0550 - 13632/2005)
Še ni bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu. ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 175(1) pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C6‑0421/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0421/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0088/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0088/2006 ),
V uredbi Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta št. 2047/2000/ES o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč, z dne 29. junija 2000, je leto 1999 izhodiščno leto za dodelitev kvot delno halogeniranih klorofluoroogljikovodikov (HCFC).
Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer takes 1999 as the base year for allocating quotas of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs).
Zaradi nastanka novih podjetij in spremenjenih tržnih deležev glede HCFC se je trg v desetih novih državah članicah za HCFC od leta 1999 bistveno spremenil.
The HCFC market in the ten new Member States has changed considerably since 1999 with the arrival of new companies and changing market shares with respect to HCFCs.
Zaradi naslednjih razlogov je sprememba izhodiščnega leta v uredbi nujno potrebna:
The base year in the Regulation should be changed for the following reasons:
• nekateri gospodarski subjekti EU-10, ki leta 1999 niso bili na trgu, bodo v letih 2002/2003 nadaljevali s svojo dejavnostjo;
· It will allow some commercial operators in the EU-10 in 2002/2003 that had not been in the market in 1999 to continue their business.
• zaradi uporabe leta 1999 kot izhodiščnega leta za dodelitev kvot HCFC za nove države članice veliko število podjetij ne bi prejelo uvozne kvote.
· Keeping 1999 as the base date for the allocation of HCFC quotas in these new Member States would result in a large number of companies not receiving an import quota.
To bi se lahko štelo za samovoljno in bi lahko privedlo do kršitev načel nediskriminacije in legitimnih pričakovanj;
This could be considered as being arbitrary and might also result in a breach of the principles of non‑discrimination and legitimate expectations.
• praviloma naj kvote temeljijo na najnovejših in najbolj reprezentativnih številkah, ki so na voljo, da se zagotovi, da številna uvozna podjetja v novih državah članicah niso izključena.
· As a general rule, quotas should be based on the most recent and representative figures available in order to ensure that a number of importing companies in the new Member States are not excluded.
Zato je primerno izbrati leta, za katera so na voljo najnovejši podatki.
It is therefore appropriate to choose the years for which the most recent data are available.
Predlog Komisije in učinek novega izhodiščnega datuma (povprečje let 2002 in 2003)
Commission proposal and effect of the new base year (average of 2002 and 2003)
Da se kar najbolje upošteva gospodarski položaj na trgu HCFC v desetih novih državah članicah, Komisija predlaga, da je podlaga za podjetja iz teh držav članic določen povprečni tržni delež za leti 2002 in 2003.
In order to best reflect the economic situation on the HCFC market in the ten new Member States, the Commission proposes that the average market-share of 2002 and 2003 should be laid down as the basis for businesses from those Member States.
Zaradi spremembe izhodiščnega datuma iz 1999 v povprečje let 2002 in 2003 bi bilo v novih državah članicah uvoznikom dodeljenih 10,35 ton ODP in proizvajalcem 126,99 ton ODP, v primerjavi s 5,44 tonami ODP in 131,89 ODP leta 1999.
Changing the base year from 1999 to the average of 2002 and 2003 would mean that importers in the new Member States would receive an allocation of 10.35 ODP tonnes and producers would receive 126.99 ODP tonnes, as opposed to 5.44 ODP tonnes and 131.89 ODP tonnes respectively in 1999.
Sprememba izhodiščnega datuma ne predstavlja nikakršnih posledic za okolje.
Changing the base date has no environmental consequences.
Gre izključno za gospodarsko spremembo, saj celotna kvota za dajanje na trg ostane nespremenjena.
It is purely an economic matter since the total quota for market release remains unchanged.
Pravna podlaga - izhodišče
Legal basis - Background
11. avgusta 2004 je Komisija sprejela predlog na pravni podlagi člena 57 listine o pristopu 2003.
On 11 August 2004, the Commission adopted a proposal pursuant to Article 57 of the Treaty of Accession 2003.
Tako pravna služba kot odbor za pravne zadeva sta bila mnenja, da bi bil člen 175 Pogodbe ES pravilna pravna podlaga.
Both the Legal Service and the Committee on Legal Affairs of the European Parliament were of the opinion that Article 175 of the EC Treaty would have been the proper legal basis.
Svet se sedaj strinja, da se predlog opre na člen 175(1) Pogodbe ES, tudi Komisija je sprejela to pravno podlago.
The Council has now reached agreement to base the proposal on Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty and this has also been accepted by the Commission.
Poročevalec upa, da je sporazum možen na prvi obravnavi, tako da se težave v novih državah članicah ne bi po nepotrebnem podaljševale.
The rapporteur also hopes that an agreement can be reached in first reading, so that the problems in the new Member States are not prolonged unnecessarily.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 2037/2000/ES glede izhodiščnega leta za dodelitev kvot delno halogeniranih klorofluoroogljikovodikov za države članice, ki so pristopile 1. maja 2004
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the base year for the allocation of quotas of hydrochlorofluorocarbons with respect to the Member States that acceded on 1 May 2004
o 21. in 22. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti (2003 in 2004)
on the Commission's 21st and 22nd Annual reports on monitoring the application of Community law (2003 and 2004)
MNENJE Odbora za peticije ............................................................................................2
OPINION of the Committee on Petitions ...............................................................29
o 21. in 22. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti (2003 in 2004)
on the Commission's 21st and 22nd annual reports on monitoring the application of community law (2003 and 2004)
– ob upoštevanju 21. in 22. letnega poročila Komisije ( KOM(2004)0839 in KOM(2005)0570 ),
– having regard to the Commission's 21st and 22nd annual reports ( COM(2004)0839 and COM(2005)0570 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta osebja Komisije ( SEC(2004)1638 ter SEC(2005)1446 in 1447),
– having regard to the Commission's staff working papers ( SEC(2004)1638 and SEC(2005)1446 and 1447),
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 in člena 112(2) Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 45 and 112(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za peticije ( A6-0089/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Petitions ( A6‑0089/2006 ),
A. ker letna poročila Komisije ugotavljajo stanje prenosa direktiv s strani držav članic, da se zagotovi učinkovit nadzor uporabe zakonodaje; ker je, kot pravi 21. poročilo, dne 31. decembra 2003 potekalo 3 927 postopkov za primere kršitev, vključno s 1 855 primeri, za katere se je začel postopek, 999 primeri, o katerih je bilo podano obrazloženo mnenje, 411 primeri, ki so bili predloženi Sodišču, in le 69 primeri (od katerih jih je 40 zadevalo okoljski sektor), za katere so se začeli postopki iz člena 228,
A. whereas the Commission's annual reports establish the state of transposition of directives by the Member States in order to ensure that the application of legislation is efficiently monitored; whereas according to the 21st report, 3,927 infringement cases were ongoing on 31 December 2003, including 1,855 cases for which proceedings had commenced, 999 cases for which a reasoned opinion had been issued, 411 cases which had been referred to the Court of Justice and only 69 cases (of which 40 concerned the environmental sector) for which Article 228 proceedings had begun,
B. ker pri ustreznem nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti ne gre le za ocenjevanje količine prenesene zakonodaje, ampak tudi za ocenjevanje kakovosti prenosa in sprejetih praks, ki se dejansko uporabljajo pri uporabi prava Skupnosti,
B. whereas proper monitoring of the application of Community law does not consist merely of assessing transposition in quantitative terms but also of evaluating the quality of transposition and of the practices adopted in actually applying Community law,
C. ker je pravilno in hitro izvajanje evropske zakonodaje sestavni in bistveni del „bolje oblikovanih predpisov“; ker je jasna in dobro napisana zakonodaja nujen pogoj za dobro uporabo prava Skupnosti v celotni EU; ker kakovost zakonodaje, ki je pogosto rezultat različnih političnih kompromisov, ni vedno zadostna in obveznosti držav članic niso zmeraj jasne,
C. whereas correct and swift implementation of European legislation is an integral and essential part of “better regulation”; whereas clear and well-written legislation is an indispensable condition for the good application of Community law all over the EU; whereas the quality of legislation and the clarity of obligations for Member States are not always satisfactory owing to the fact that the legislation is often the result of difficult political compromises,
D. ker lahko Komisija prilagaja sredstva, ki jih uporablja za učinkovito opravljanje svojih nalog in iskanje inovacij, namenjenih izboljšanju uporabe prava Skupnosti,
D. whereas the Commission may adapt the means it uses to carry out its mission effectively and make innovations designed to improve the application of Community law,
E. ker se Komisija zdaj ukvarja s prilagajanjem obstoječih postopkov in načini, kako jih pospešiti in napraviti učinkovitejše; vseeno to ni zadosten razlog, da se zahtevane informacije glede skupnih sredstev, ki so v ustreznih generalnih direktoratih in generalnem sekretariatu namenjena vprašanju kršitev, ne pošljejo pravočasno,
E. whereas the Commission is currently working on the adaptation of existing procedures and on ways of making them faster and more efficient; however, this is not sufficient reason for not transmitting on time the information requested as to the total number of resources allocated to infringements in the relevant Directorates General and the General Secretariat,
F. ker število pritožb v zvezi s kršitvami prava Skupnosti kaže, da imajo evropski državljani bistveno vlogo pri uporabi prava Skupnosti ter da je ustrezna obravnava njihovih težav pomembna za verodostojnost Evropske unije,
F. whereas the number of complaints relating to infringements of Community law shows that European citizens play a vital role in the application of Community law, and that the capability properly to address their concerns is important for the credibility of the European Union,
G. ker pritožbe državljanov pri graditvi „Evrope ljudi“ niso le simboličnega pomena, ampak predstavljajo stroškovno učinkovito in uspešno orodje za nadzor uporabe prava Skupnosti,
G. whereas citizens' complaints are not just symbolic in building a 'people's Europe' but constitute a cost-effective and efficient tool for monitoring the application of Community law,