natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Glede 60. obletnice Schumanove deklaracije, ki je temelj evropskega povezovanja, je predsednik poslancem povedal, da se je dnevov odprtih vrat parlamentarnih stavb v Bruslju in Strasbourgu 8. in 9. maja udeležilo več kot 38 tisoč obiskovalcev.
In addition, the jobs offered to young people are often internships, which offer far less security.
Glavno nagrado Karla Velikega pa je dva dni kasneje prejel poljski premier Donald Tusk.
Youth policy is decided at national level and cooperation between member states is voluntary.
Namesto tgea bodo poslanci razpravljali o razmerah na Tajskem.
26% of unemployed 15-24 year-olds out of work for more than a year
Parlament bo o razrešnici proračuna Sveta EU za leto 2008, ki je bila prestavljena z zasedanja v Bruslju, glasoval v sredo.
35% of unemployed 25-29 year-olds out of work for over a year
Skupna kmetijska politika EU je preveč birokratska, poenostavimo jo!
EP report EU Youth report 2009 European Commission website on Youth
Za kaj pravzaprav gre pri razpravi o SKP?
What’s the stake of the current debate on CAP?
Za SKP je namenjenih 40 odstotkov evropskega proračuna.
The CAP still accounts for 40% of the EU budget.
Pri tem ob omembi skupne kmetijske politike EU marsikdo še vedno pomisli na vinska jezera, gore hrane in neučinkovitost.
When you refer to CAP though, the initial reaction of the man in the street will be to think of wine lakes, food mountains and supporting inefficiency.
O tem smo govorili pred 15 leti, danes gre zato, da zagotovimo oskrbo s hrano 500 milijonom evropskih državljanov in to po primerni ceni.
That was the debate 15 years ago, but now it is about guaranteeing and securing the food supply to 500 million European citizens at a reasonable cost.
Brez reforme proračuna ne bomo dobili reforme SKP.
We can’t have a CAP reform before we get a budget reform.
Gospodarska kriza, brezposelnost in mnogo drugih vprašanj sploh ni bilo na vidiku, ko smo nazadnje reformirali skupno kmetijsko politiko.
The economic crisis, unemployment and lots of other areas, were not even on the horizon when we last reformed CAP.
Nato so tukaj še varna oskrba z energijo, podnebne spremembe, nadzor nad migracijami.
Then there are energy security, climate change, migration control.
Državljani od EU pričakujejo, da bo za vse to poskrbela, ampak z enako denarja kot prej.
Citizens expect Europe to deliver on these things, but with the same budget as before.
Kmetijstvo bo zelo težko obdržalo svoj 40-odstotni delež.
Agriculture will have to fight hard to maintain 40% of the budget.
Zakaj bi morali SKP poenostaviti?
Why should the CAP be simplified?
Kako bo to koristilo kmetom, lahko daste kak konkreten primer?
Once simplified, how will it benefit farmers, can you give a few concrete examples?
Kmetje morajo izpolnjevati vrsto okoljskih, zdravstvenih in drugih standardov.
Farmers have to comply with environmental, health and welfare standards.
SKP je danes preveč birokratska, mnogo pravil ni sorazmernih s tveganji, ki naj bi jih preprečila.
The CAP today is too bureaucratic; many regulations are not proportionate to the risks.
Večina kmetov je tako ali tako obvezana spoštovati kriterije o kakovosti in sledljivosti proizvodov, saj to od njih zahtevajo prodajalci in predelovalci.
Most farmers already have to comply with very comprehensive quality assurance and traceability standards imposed by retailers or processors.
Zato je zelo nadležno, če se nato pojavi še človek z ministrstva, ki želi upoštevanje teh standardov še enkrat preveriti.
It’s very irritating if literally a week later a man from the Ministry comes round with a clipboard to inspect you again.
Še več birokracije samo zato, ker preverjanje, ali so standardi upoštevani, ni usklajeno.
All that paperwork again because the schemes are not harmonized.
Kmetje pa morajo zato svoj čas porabljati za vse kaj drugega kot obdelovanje zemlje in vzgajanja živine.
That takes farmers away from the day-to-day job of managing livestock or farming the land.
Pri tem so kmetje jezni še zaradi kazni, ki jim grozijo, če na formularjih oddajo napačne podatke.
Another cause of anger amongst farmers is that any mistake in the forms submitted will be penalized, generally on a standard basis, so a tiny little error gets you that same disproportionate penalty.
Že majhna napaka lahko pomeni nesorazmerno visoko kazen, pri čemer velja poudariti, da te napake pogosto niso namerne, ampak so posledica napačnih podatkov, ki so jih posredovale državne institucije.
And very often that mistake was made not out of wilful intent to defraud the EU, but, say, because of wrong information from the local food standard agency.
To je zelo nepravično.
This is blatantly unfair.
Za prvo napako ne bi smelo biti kazni, če pa se napake ponavljajo, bi seveda moral biti kmet kaznovan.
There should be a presumption that first offence no penalty, but if you keep doing it then quite obviously you should.
Še en malce sporen predlog: zakaj ne bi dovolili kmetom, da sami opravijo potrebna preverjanja, ali na svojih kmetijah spoštujejo predpisane standarde?
Another controversial area: why can’t we self-certify, why do we need the man with the clipboard?
Kmetje iz držav, ki so se EU pridružile leta 2004, še vedno dobivajo manj subvencij kot njihovi kolegi iz starih članic.
Farmers from the newly-joined EU countries still receive lower subsidies than those farmers from countries that joined the EU before.
Se bo to po letu 2013 spremenilo?
Will that change after 2013?
Države so se pridružile tudi na temelju prehodnega sporazuma, ki pravi, da se bo višina subvencij postopoma prilagajala tistim, ki so v veljavi v starih članicah.
They joined on the basis of a transitional arrangement that they would gradually come up to speed with the EU-15.
V tem je nekakšna logika, čeprav razumem kmete iz novih članic, ko gledajo svoje kolege iz starih članic, ki imajo polno podporo, medtem ko je oni sami nimajo.
There is logic in that, but I have certain sympathy for the EU-12 looking across the fence seeing British, German, French farmers fully supported when they are not.
Želim si, da bi bila kmetijska politika EU enostavnejša, pravičnejša in bolj pregledna.
I want to see agriculture simpler, fairer and more transparent.
Če pri tem ne uspemo, lahko nove članice blokirajo reformi SKP in proračuna.
Otherwise I can see new Members States crying foul to block any CAP or budget reform until we make sure that the CAP is fair.
Razumem jih.
I can see their point.
Bili ste kmet na Novi Zelandiji v začetku 1970ih, tik preden se je Velika Britanija pridružila EU.
You yourself were a farmer in New Zealand in the beginning of 70's just before the UK joined the EU.
Kako bi tam razložili kmetijsko politiko EU?
What would you tell farmers there about EU agriculture?
Najprej bi poudaril, da evropski kmetje niso odvisniki od subvencij.
First, I would be clear that European farmers by and large are not ‘subsidy-junkies’.
Večina kmetov bi bila raje popolnoma neodvisnih kot subvencioniranih.
Most farmers would prefer to be fully independent rather than subsidized.
Ampak biti moramo realistični, saj nismo na Novi Zelandiji.
But then we have to be realistic; we are not New Zealand.
Povprečna plača je tukaj znatno višja kot tam.
The average worker’s salary here is considerably higher than in New Zealand.
Ampak dohodek povprečnega kmeta je le polovico povprečne plače.
But the average farmer's income here is only half that of the average worker.
Brez podpore bi dobili krizo.
Without support we would have a crisis.
Evropska javnost goji do kmetov pričakovanja v zvezi z okoljem, zdravjem živali in kakovostjo rastlin.
The public in Europe for very real reasons also place expectations on farmers in terms of environment, animal health and welfare, plant sanitation, etc.
To pomeni stroške, ki jih ne moremo prevaliti na potrošnike.
That implies costs which we cannot pass on to our consumers.
Sprejem beguncev: spodbude državam članicam za prostovoljni prevzem
Resettling refugees: financial incentives for volunteer host countries
Evropske države namreč sprejmejo manj beguncev kot ZDA, Avstralija in Kanada.
EU Member States currently contribute far less to refugee resettlement than do other developed countries such as the USA, Australia and Canada.
Parlament je tudi potrdil ustanovitev Evropskega urada za podporo azilu, o čemer je že bil dosežen dogovor s Svetom.
MEPs also approved the setting up of a European Asylum Support Office, following an agreement reached with the Council.
Leta 2008 je EU sprejela le 6,7 odstotka svetovnih beguncev, oziroma 4378 ljudi.
The EU contributed to only 6.7% of the global resettlement of refugees in 2008, with 4,378 individuals.
Dodatna sredstva, ki bi jih nove sodelujoče članice prejele v prvih dveh letih sodelovanja v programu, naj bi vložile v razvoj trajnostnega programa ponovne naselitve.
The additional amount that newly participating Member States receive for the first two years must be invested in developing a sustainable resettlement programme.
Parlament je poročilo, ki ga je pripravil Rui TAVARES (GUE/NGL, PT), v torek potrdil s 512 glasovi za, 81 proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi.
Parliament adopted the report by Portuguese MEP Rui Tavares (GUE/NGL) by 512 votes to 81, with 7 abstentions.
Program za ponovno naselitev je sicer ena od prednostnih nalog Unije, o katerih se Parlament in Svet ne strinjata.
It will follow a number of EU priorities, upon which Parliament and the Council have yet to agree.
Poslanci poudarjajo, da je treba pri izvajanju dati prednost ženskam in otrokom, ki so bili žrtve nasilja, mladoletnikom brez spremstva, osebe s posebnimi zdravstvenimi potrebami ter žrtvam mučenja.
MEPs wish priority to go to children and women at risk of violence or exploitation, unaccompanied minors, persons with serious medical needs, and survivors of violence and torture.
Za razliko od njih želi Svet vzpostaviti prednostno listo glede na geografski izvor in nacionalnost beguncev.
The Council wishes to establish priorities according to the geographic origin and nationality of refugees.
Urad za podporo azilu
Asylum: an agency to assist Member States
Poslanci so tudi podprli ustanovitev Evropskega urada za podporo azilu, kot se zavzema poročilo, ki ga je pripravila Jean LAMBERT (Zeleni/EFA, UK).
Parliament also approved the creation of a European Asylum Support Office when it adopted a second-reading report by British Green MEP Jean Lambert.
Urad bo imel sedež v La Valletti na Malti in bo nudil svojo strokovno pomoč in izkušnje državam članicam, prejemnicam prosilcev za azil.
Based in Valletta (Malta) the office will lend its expertise to Member States receiving asylum seekers.
Prek urada naj bi se okrepilo sodelovanje med pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi, ki jim bo v primeru posebnih povečanih potreb dajal tudi administrativno podporo.
It will seek to strengthen co-operation among national authorities and afford administrative support to Member States subject to particular pressure.
Parlament in Svet sta pred drugo obravnavo zakonodajnega predloga dosegla soglasje, da bo med pristojnostmi urada tudi usklajevanje izmenjave informacij o izvajanju ponovne naselitev v državah članicah.
Parliament and the Council agreed at second reading to assign the office the task of co-ordinating information exchange on resettlement measures carried out by Member States.
Oznake porekla bi lahko postale obvezne tudi za oblačila
"Made in" labels could become compulsory for clothes
Več informacij za potrošnike tudi na oblačilih. ©BELGA/FREY/Jean Francois Omogočiti potrošniku informirano odločitev Vedeti je treba, kje so bila oblačila izdelana Oznake "Izdelano v..." oziroma "Made in..." bi morale po mnenju Parlamenta v prihodnosti postale sestavni del vseh oblačil za prodajo na evropskem trgu.
Countries that have well established quality clothes industries are anxious to keep the "Made in" label to boost sales. ©BELGA/FREY/Jean Francois Country of origin labels should become compulsory for clothes sold "Made in" labels currently voluntary Country of origin labels should become compulsory for clothes sold in Europe so that consumers are not misled by labels suggesting they were made in an EU Member State, said the European Parliament on Tuesday when it approved an update of the EU clothes labelling scheme.
Poslanci se zavzemajo tudi za usklajena nova pravila o označevanju.
The only way to ensure that consumers are not deceived by labels implying clothes were made in the EU when they were in fact made in a third country is to make "made in" labels mandatory, MEPs decided.
Po mnenju parlamentarcev bi moralo označevanje porekla oblačil postati obvezno, ker se bo le tako lahko preprečilo, da oznake ne bodo zavajale potrošnika, češ da je bilo oblačilo izdelano v državi članici EU, ne pa v kateri od tretjih držav (na primer na Kitajskem ali v Bangladešu).
"Made in" labels are currently voluntary in the EU but in practice their use depends on national laws.
Označevanje je v Evropi za razliko od ZDA, Kanade in Japonske sedaj prostovoljno in ga večinoma ureja nacionalna zakonodaja.
In comparison, country of origin labelling is strictly regulated in, for example, the USA, Canada and Japan.
Hitrejši vstop na trg za nove vrste blaga
New textiles to hit the market faster
Sedaj veljavna zakonodaja o označevanju tekstilnih izdelkov velja le za imena tekstilnih vlaken, ki jih je 48 (18 naravnih in 30 sintetičnih) in surovinske sestave tekstilnih izdelkov, ki se prodajajo na enotnem trgu .
Current EU legislation on textile labelling applies only to the harmonisation of textile fibre names - there are currently 48 fibres (18 natural and 30 synthetic) sold on the single market - and the labelling of the fibre composition of textile products.
Prvotni predlog je predvideval, da bi Parlament glasoval samo o tehničnem predlogu Komisije za skrajšanje roka odobritve dajanja novih vlaken na trg.
Although Parliament was initially asked to vote only on a technical proposal by the Commission (aiming at cutting the time taken to place new fibres on the market), MEPs turned this into a more political proposal, to make country of origin labelling mandatory in the new regulation.
Z dopolnili so poslanci dodali politični element - obvezno označevanje države porekla.
EU legislation: new labelling requirements may be needed
Potrošnik bi moral imeti možnost, da na podlagi informacij izvede premišljeno odločitev o nakupu izdelka, zato so poslanci Komisiji predlagali, naj najkasneje v dveh letih pripravi poročilo in, če bo treba, predstavi predlog sprememb pravil o označevanju.
To help consumers to make informed choices, MEPs also asked the Commission to produce a report within two years, and if necessary a proposal for legislation to impose the new labelling requirements EU-wide.
Dokument naj bi se posvetil tudi vprašanju uvedbe usklajenih navodil o vzdrževanju oblačil (ki so sedaj prostovoljna), sistemu enotnega označevanja velikosti za oblačila in obutev, zdravstvenih in varnostnih opozoril na oblačilih (vnetljivost, alergene snovi) ter morebitni uvedbi oznake socialne pravičnosti pri izdelavi.
This report should examine the harmonised requirements on care labelling (currently voluntary), clothing and footwear sizes, on health and safety warnings (flammability, possible allergenic substances) and on social labelling.
Poročilo o predlogu uredbe je pripravil Toine MANDERS (ALDE, NL) je Parlament v torek podprl s 528 glasovi za, 18 proti in 108 vzdržanimi glasovi.
Parliament's report on this subject was drafted by Toine Manders and adopted by 528 votes to 18, with 108 abstentions.
Evropski poslanci so danes razpravljali o skupnih evropskih pravilih za presaditve organov, ki bi v času povečanega povpraševanja po človeških organih omogočila njihov varen prevoz in presaditev.
Wives of self-employed should have similar maternity leave rights to employees
"Cilj je imeti več organov za več bolnikov," je ob tem poudaril Mikolašik in dodal, da je danes na voljo veliko kakovostnih organov z dobro sledljivostjo, vendar preprosto ne pridejo do nekaterih držav.
The EU is to update an existing law to give standard social protection rights to self-employed workers and the spouses or life partners of self-employed workers.
Eurotransplant tako pojasnjuje, da države, ki sodelujejo v njem, izmenjajo 20 odstotkov vseh presajenih organov (okoli 3300), medtem ko mrežo zapustita le dva odstotka organov.
Spouses or life partners are not employees but they nonetheless habitually help the self-employed worker (which is very common in farming, small firms and liberal professions).
Vprašanje prostovoljnega ali obveznega vplačevanja prispevkov ostaja prepuščeno državam članicam, ki pa bi morale po mnenju članov odbora v vsakem primeru zagotavljati vsaj 14 tednov porodniškega dopusta, kar kot minimalno obdobje za zaposlene že zdaj predpisuje evropska direktiva.
In any event, any pregnant self-employed woman or self-employed worker's spouse would be entitled to a "sufficient maternity allowance to cover interruptions at their work" of at least 14 weeks' maternity leave, i.e. the minimum paid maternity leave laid down for normal employees by the EU maternity leave directive.
Prav tako ostaja na nacionalni ravni odločitev, ali je za samozaposlene koriščenje porodniškega dopusta prostovoljno ali obvezno.
Again, it will be up to Member States to decide whether the leave is mandatory or voluntary, and whether this social protection can also be "proportional to the participation in the activities of the self-employed worker".
Začasno nadomeščanje
Temporary replacement
Parlamentarci predlagajo, da bi lahko samozaposlenim materam kot alternativo celotnemu ali delu porodniškega dopusta omogočili dostop do obstoječih nacionalnih shem, ki nudijo začasno nadomeščanje delavke na porodniškem dopust.
Access to any existing national services providing temporary replacement of a woman on maternity leave can be considered "an alternative to, or a part of, the maternity allowance", said MEPs.
V tem primeru ženska na porodniškem dopustu ne bi prejemala celotnega nadomestila, vendar pa bi hkrati imela zagotovljeno nadomeščanje.
In this case, the woman in leave would not receive the full maternity allowance but could be easily replaced in the family business.
Brez diskriminacije pri ustanavljanju podjetij
No discrimination when establishing a company
Evropski parlament še poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi bodo zagotovile, da pogoji za ustanovitev podjetja dveh zakoncev ali življenjskih partnerjev (če to priznava nacionalna zakonodaja), niso strožji kot za ustanovitev podjetja nepovezanih oseb.
Lastly, Parliament calls on Member States to take necessary measures to ensure that the conditions for establishing a company between spouses (or life partners when recognised by national law) are not more restrictive than between other persons.
Svet naj bi svoje skupno stališče, ki bo upoštevalo v torek potrjena dopolnila, sprejemal 7. junija.
The Council is set to adopt these amendments on 7 June.
Države članice bodo morale svojo zakonodajo s spremembami direktive uskladiti v dveh letih.
Member States will then have two years to implement all these changes to the directive, or up to four years "if Member States find difficulties" in finding the way to grant standard social protection to self-employed workers or spouses and partners of the self-employed.
Parlament podprl pravila za poenostavitev darovanja organov med članicami
MEPs want deeds not words in governing of Europe's economy
Jennifer Sutton, ki je dobila srce darovalca, si je svoje nekdanje srce ogledala kar na razstavi. ©BELGA/AFP/SHAUN CURRY Darovanja morajo biti prostovoljna Zaznamek, da je oseba darovalec tudi na osebnih izkaznicah Čakalne vrste za bolnike, ki potrebujejo presaditev jeter ali drugih darovanih organov, bi se lahko skrajšale z uveljavitvijo nove evropske zakonodaje, ki so jo parlamentarci sprejeli v sredo, naj bi skrajšal.
Left to right from top left:Diego Lopez Garrido, Olli Rehn, Joseph Daul, Martin Schulz, Guy Verhofstadt, Rebecca Harms, Timothy Kirkhope, Lothar Bisky, Niki Tzavela .
Direktiva o standardih kakovosti in varnosti človeških organov, namenjenih za presaditev ureja celoten postopek od darovanja do presaditve, poslanci pa so sprejeli tudi resolucijo akcijskem načrtu o darovanju organov.
Calls for more euro-coordination Fiscal responsibility How Europe should govern its economy amid the current crisis and what may be left its wake dominated debate in the European Parliament Wednesday morning.
V zadnjih petdesetih letih je presajanje organov postalo ustaljena praksa po vsem svetu in je pogosto edini način zdravljenja določenih bolezni.
In the 3 hour debate many MEPs called for the European Union to coordinate its economic policies more closely to mirror such cooperation in other policy fields.
Čakalne vrste pa ostajajo dolge: v Evropi na presaditev organa čaka okoli 60.000 bolnikov in vsak dan jih v povprečju umre 12 ljudi s tega seznama.
The need for fiscal responsibility and the reigning in of public debt was also emphasised.
Kompromisno besedilo direktive, o katerem so predstavniki Parlamenta predhodno dosegli soglasje s Svetom, je bilo sprejeto s 643 glasovi za, 16 proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi.
Many Members felt that the financial system itself was rotten and encouraged irresponsible behaviour - leaving taxpayers to foot the bill.
Te ustanove bi morale na podlagi skupnih standardov nato določiti podrobna pravila delovanja za vse faze postopka, od darovanja do presaditve ali odstranitve.
To remedy it he proposed short term help such as to Greece and longer-term structural reforms of pensions, health systems and labour markets.
Direktiva še določa osnovni nabor podatkov, ki jih je treba zbrati za vsako darovanje organov.
He also called for closer coordination of economic policies.
Izjeme so mogoče le v primerih, kadar analiza tveganja pokaže, da je pričakovana korist za prejemnika večja od nevarnosti, ki jo pomenijo nepopolni podatki.
Speaking in the Chamber the European Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs Olli Rehn told MEPs that "the EU is prepared to defend the euro whatever it takes".
Zakonodaja tudi zahteva, da je zdravstveno osebje, ki bo ravnalo z organi ob presaditvah, ustrezno kvalificirano ali usposobljeno.
Referring to a Communication of 12 May he said that competitiveness must be raised and crisis resolution mechanisms improved.
Države članice bi morale zagotavljati najvišjo možno zaščito živih darovalcev, ta darovanja pa morajo biti prostovoljna in neplačana.
He also said that the Commission would be willing to make recommendations on each national budget of a Member State to ensure that countries adhered to the terms of the Stability and Growth pact.
Države bi morale tudi prepovedati oglaševanje potrebe po organih ali njihove razpoložljivosti, če je namen oglaševanja premoženjska korist.
He went on to say that deficits must be reduced and measures have to be taken now, irrespective of whether the government is right or left wing .
Države članice, ali pristojne organizacije, bodo lahko sklepale sporazume z evropskimi organizacijami za izmenjavo organov, če bodo te izpolnjevale zahteve iz direktive.
His finished by saying "if we have to make budget cuts everywhere, MEPs and civil servants have to lead the way".
Določila direktive morajo članice prenesti v svoje nacionalne zakonodaje v dveh letih po začetku njene veljavnosti.
Martin Schulz of the Socialist and Democrats group was critical of what he called "laissez-faire ideology".
Akcijski načrt o darovanju in presajanju organov (2009-2015)
He called the current system "partly immoral, perverse".
Samoiniciativno poročilo, ki ga je pripravil Andres PERELLO RODRIGUEZ (S&D, ES), pozdravlja akcijski načrt Komisije o darovanju in poudarja, da bodo imenovanje koordinatorjev za presaditev in darovanja v vsaki bolnišnici ter izmenjava informacij in najboljših praks pomagali državam s pomanjkanjem organov za presaditev.
He also criticised rating agencies which during the peak of problems in Greece were "already looking at the next target and trying to bring down Portugal.
Poslanci tudi pozivajo, naj se državljanom da možnost vključitve v sheme darovanja, ko zaprosijo za izdajo potnega lista ali vozniškega dovoljenja.
They should be controlled, they should be subject to rules" he said.