natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V praksi je učinek tak, da se s področja uporabe direktive izključi patente tako, da se določi, da do sprejetja izčrpnejših predpisov o patentih na ravni Skupnosti v prihodnosti (v obliki ustrezne direktive), se določbe te direktive ne uporabljajo za patente.
In practical terms, the effect is to exclude from the scope of the directive the subject of patents by establishing that, pending the adoption of more comprehensive rules on patents at Community level in future (in the form of a suitable directive), the provisions of the present proposal should not apply to patents.
To bi preprečilo, da se poseže v vsebino (vključno s kazenskimi vidiki) vsake bodoče zakonodaje o patentih.
This would avoid prejudging the content (including the criminal aspects) of any future legislation on patents.
Poleg tega bi omejilo področje uporabe direktive na tiste pravice intelektualne lastnine, ki jih predpisuje zakonodaja Skupnosti.
Moreover, it would restrict the scope of the directive to those intellectual property rights provided for by Community legislation.
Končno, zaradi notranje doslednosti, poročevalec predlaga manjše spremembe k uvodni izjavi 5 in besedilu člena 2, ter jasnejšo in bolj racionalno ubeseditev členov 5, 6 in 7.
Finally, for reasons of internal consistency, the rapporteur proposes minor amendments to recital 5 and the text of Article 2, and clearer and more rational wording for Articles 5, 6 and 7.
Bodoči razvoj
Future developments
Poročevalec upa, da bo zakonodajalec Skupnosti, ko bo v prihodnje načrtoval strategije za boj proti piratstvu in ponarejanju, in glede na to, da se začenja čas večje harmonizacije na tem področju, preučil možnost, da najde način in sredstva, da se kaznuje tudi tiste, ki kupijo dobrine nezakonitega izvora.
The rapporteur hopes that, when drawing up future strategies to combat piracy and counterfeiting, and as we embark on an era of greater harmonisation in this field, the Community legislator will consider the possibility of finding ways and means of also punishing those who acquire goods whose provenance is unlawful.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskih ukrepih za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine
on the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
Po nedavni sodbi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi C-176/03 Komisija v skladu s členom 95 Pogodbe predlaga direktivo o kazenskih ukrepih in pravicah intelektualne lastnine (PIL).
Following a recent judgement of the European Court of Justice in case C-176/03, the Commission is proposing a directive on criminal measures and intellectual property rights (IPRs) under Article 95 of the Treaty.
Brez poseganja v pristojnost Odbora za pravne zadeve je treba pripomniti, da obstajajo resni dvomi v široko razlago sodbe s strani Komisije, kakor je bila predstavljena v sporočilu KOM (2005)583; posledično pa tudi v pravni temelj predloga.
Without prejudice to the competence of the Committee on Legal Affaires it is worth noting that there are serious concerns about the European Commission's broad interpretation of the judgement as set out in Communication COM(2005)583; and, as a consequence, about the legal base of the proposal.
Glede vprašanj, ki so v pristojnosti Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, pa je treba upoštevati naslednje poglavitne dejavnike:
Concerning the issues under the competence of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the main elements to be considered are the following:
a) namen direktive;
(a) scope of the directive;
b) opredelitev "trgovinsko pomembnega obsega";
(b) definition of "commercial scale";
c) opredelitev "namerne kršitve PIL";
(c) definition of "intentional infringement of an IPR";
d) kaznivost pomoči in napeljevanja;
(d) criminalization of abetting and inciting;
e) skupne preiskovalne enote;
(e) joint investigation teams;
f) temeljne pravice.
(f) fundamental rights.
Namen tega zakonodajnega akta je boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu, zlasti na področju glasbe, luksuznih dobrin, tekstilne industrije in povezanih področjih.
The scope of this piece of legislation is to tackle counterfeit and piracy, particularly in the music, luxury goods, clothing industries and related sectors.
Obstajajo pa resne težave v zvezi z možnimi učinki te direktive, če so ukrepi za boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu posplošeni in jih je možno uporabiti za vse oblike PIL.
However, there are serious concerns regarding the possible effects of this Directive when measures to combat counterfeiting and piracy are simply generalised as applicable to all forms of IPRs.
Treba je poudariti, da se kršitve nekaterih PIL razlikujejo po naravi in vrsti, kar pomeni, da se morajo razlikovati tudi ukrepi za boj proti kršitvam teh PIL.
It needs to be stressed that infringements of certain IPRs varies in nature and manner of infringement, which means that measures to combat infringements of those IPRs should differ.
Razlika je med kršitvami patentov med običajno trgovsko dejavnostjo, kot je legitimno razvijanje izdelkov, in ponarejanjem ter piratstvom z goljufivim naklepom.
There is a distinction between patent infringements in the normal course of commercial activity, such as the legitimate development of products, and counterfeiting and piracy with fraudulent and deliberate intent.
Obstajajo ukrepi civilnega prava za kršitve patentov in domnevne kršitelje patentov se ne bi smelo enačiti z zločinci, kot so pirati in ponarejevalci.
There are civil remedies for patent infringements and alleged patent infringers should not be equated with criminals like pirates and counterfeiters.
Včasih mora gospodarska družba namenoma prekršiti patentno pravico, da dokaže, da sporni patent ni veljaven, to pa prispeva k inovaciji.
A company may need to infringe a patent intentionally in order to demonstrate that the patent at issue is not valid, and this contributes to innovation.
S tem v zvezi bi kršitev morala ostati stvar civilnega prava, kot je to sedaj, razen v primeru, da kršitev resno ogroža javno zdravje ali varnost.
In this context, the infringement should remain a civil matter as is currently the case, unless the infringement constitutes a serious threat to public health or safety.
Trgovinsko pomembni obseg
Commercial scale
Sklicevanje na trgovinsko pomembni obseg je bilo uvedeno v sporazumu TRIPS, vendar tam ni bil opredeljen.
The reference to commercial scale was introduced but not defined by the TRIPS Agreement.
Vseeno pa jezik sporazuma TRIPS, uporaba te besedne zveze v celotnem besedilu sporazuma in umeščenost v besedilo pomagajo pri razumevanju pojma.
However, the language of the TRIPS Agreement, the use of that phrase throughout the whole Agreement, and the context helps to interpret the concept.
Nanaša se le na kršitve iz koristoljubja, ki imetniku PIL povzročijo znatno neposredno izgubo; neprofitna izmenjava zakonito pridobljenih vsebin med posamezniki mora biti izključena iz uporabe direktive.
It refers to for-profit infringement only which causes significant direct loss to the holder of an IPR; non-profit exchange of legally acquired content between individuals must be excluded from the application of the directive.
Glede na to, da je namen zakonodajnega predloga kaznovanje le kršitev, ki je storjena v trgovinsko pomembnem obsegu, je nujno imeti jasno opredelitev tega pojma, da se izognemo pravni negotovosti.
As the legislative proposal intends to penalize infringement on commercial scale only, it is essential to have a clear definition of that in order to avoid legal uncertainty.
Ne moremo se zanašati na prakso držav članic na tem področju, saj je praksa od države do države razlikuje.
We can not rely on Member States' practice on that field as it varies from one Member State to another.
Namerne kršitve PIL
Intentional infringement of IPRs
Le zavestne kršitve, storjene z namenom, je možno kaznovati s kazenskimi sankcijami: to vključuje le primere, ko se storilec zaveda, da krši PIL, in to počne zavestno, s premišljenim naklepom.
Only the knowing acts of infringements that are intentional could be sanctioned with criminal measures: it covers only those cases when the perpetrator is aware that he is infringing IPRs, and he is doing it intentionally with malice aforethought.
Treba je razlikovati med kršitvami, saj kršitve ni mogoče razumeti kot namerne izključno zato, ker je del druge zavestne dejavnosti, kot sta denimo. poslušanje glasbe ali gledanje filma.
Distinction must be made as an infringement should not be considered intentional simply because it is part of an intentional activity such as listening to music or watching films.
Pomoč in napeljevanje
Abetting and inciting
Pomembno je ločevati med kršitvami patentov med običajno trgovsko dejavnostjo (legitimno razvijanje izdelkov), in ponarejanjem ter piratstvom z goljufivim naklepom, ki jih pogosto izvršujejo hudodelske združbe.
It is important to distinguish between patent infringements in the normal course of commercial activity (legitimate development of products) and counterfeiting and piracy with fraudulent and deliberate intent, which are often carried out by criminal organizations.
Kazenske sankcije za napeljevanje h kaznivim dejanjem in za pomoč je treba hraniti za najhujša kazniva dejanja; kaznovati napeljevanje h kršitvi pravic intelektualne lastnine in pomoč pri tem je nesorazmerno.
Criminal sanctions for abetting and inciting any criminal act must be saved for the most serious crimes; to penalize abetting and inciting is disproportionate in case of infringement of intellectual property rights.
Treba je v celoti spoštovati Listino o človekovih pravicah, zlasti odstavek 3 člena 49, ki določa, da "kazen ne sme biti nesorazmerna s kaznivim dejanjem".
The Charter of Fundamental Rights must be fully respected, in particular paragraph 3 of Article 49, which states that 'the severity of penalties must not be disproportionate to the criminal offence'.
Člen 7 predloga dovoljuje strokovnjakom in predstavnikom imetnika PIL, da sodeluje pri preiskavi.
Article 7 of the proposal authorizes the experts and representatives of the holder of the IPRs to assist the investigation.
Kljub temu, da je imetnik PIL tisti, ki lahko nedvomno prepozna svoje blago in izdelke, je treba biti pri tem posebno previdni.
Though it is the holder of the IPRs indeed who could identify his goods and products without doubts, care must be paid in this regard.
Prvič, glede na to, da je imetnik PIL tisti, ki dovoli ali prepove uporabo svoje intelektualne lastnine, in tudi zaradi zaščite imetnika PIL, lahko pri preiskavi sodelujejo le predstavniki z ustreznim dovoljenjem in pooblastilom.
First, as it is for the holder of IPRs to authorize or forbid the use of his intellectual product, and also because of the protection of the holder of the IPR, only duly authorized and mandated representatives could assist the investigation team.
Drugič, pomoč, ki jo nudita imetnik PIL ali njegov predstavnik, mora biti omejena, da se kazenski postopek ne "privatizira"; obsežnejša in aktivnejša vključitev imetnikov PIL bi lahko ogrozila poštenost in nepristranskost preiskave in kazenskega postopka.
Secondly, assistance given by either the holder of IPRs or its representative must be limited in order to avoid 'privatizing' the criminal procedure; more extensive or more active involvement of the holders of the IPRs would pose a risk to the fair and impartial investigation and criminal procedure.
Pri opredeljevanju kaznivih dejanj in sankcij ter tekom preiskave in sodnega postopka je treba v celoti spoštovati Listino o temeljnih pravicah.
The Charter of Fundamental Rights must be fully respected when defining criminal acts and sanctions, as well as in the course of the investigation and the judicial procedure.
Zlasti je treba biti pozorni na naslednje člene Listine: člen 8 o varovanju podatkov; člen 47 o poštenem sojenju; in člen 49 o zakonitosti in sorazmernosti kaznivih dejanj in kazni.
Particular attention must be paid to the following articles of the Charter: Article 8 on data protection; Article 47 on fair trial; and Article 49 on legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties.
(9) Zaradi olajšanja kazenskih preiskav ali postopkov v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji glede kršitev na področju intelektualne lastnine, le-ti ne smejo temeljiti na izjavi ali obtožbi osebe, ki je žrtev kaznivega dejanja.
(9) To facilitate investigations or criminal proceedings concerning intellectual property offences, these may not be dependent on a report or accusation made by a person subjected to the offence.
(9a) Pri opredeljevanju kaznivih dejanj in sankcij ter tekom preiskave in sodnega postopka je treba v celoti spoštovati pravice, določene v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
(9a) The rights set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union should be fully respected when defining criminal acts and penalties, during investigations and in the course of judicial proceedings.
Ta direktiva določa kazenske ukrepe, potrebne za boj proti namernim kršitvam pravic intelektualne lastnine v trgovinsko pomembnem obsegu in za njihovo preprečevanje .
This Directive lays down criminal measures necessary to combat and deter the intentional infringement of intellectual property rights on a commercial scale .
Ta predlog sprememb ponovno vzpostavlja jezik, ki ga uporablja sporazum TRIPS (člen 61), na katerem temelji predlog.
This amendment restores the language used by the TRIPS agreement (Art. 61), upon which this proposal is based.
Ti ukrepi se uporabljajo za pravice intelektualne lastnine, predvidene v pravu Skupnosti in/ali nacionalnem pravu držav članic.
These measures shall apply to intellectual property rights provided for in Community legislation and/or national legislation in the Member States.
Harmonizira te kazenske ukrepe na ravni EU, ko je to potrebno za boj proti namerni kršitvi pravic intelektualne lastnine , storjeni v okviru hudodelske združbe ali ko kršitev ogroža zdravje in varnost.
It harmonises these criminal measures at EU level where this is necessary to combat the intentional infringement of intellectual property rights committed under the aegis of a criminal organisation, or where they carry a health or safety risk.
Brez poseganja v ukrepe, ki že obstajajo v državah članicah, se ukrepi iz te direktive uporabljajo le za naklepne kršitve blagovne znamke, vključno s ponarejanjem, ali za piratstvo avtorskih pravic.
Without prejudice to measures that already exist in Member States, the measures laid down in this Directive shall apply only to wilful trademark infringement, including counterfeiting, and copyright piracy.
V primerih kršitev patentov bi to posegalo v civilnopravne sisteme držav članic.
In cases of patent infringements this would interfere with the civil law systems of the Member States.
Neprofitna izmenjava zakonito pridobljenih vsebin med posamezniki je izključena iz področja uporabe te direktive.
The non-profit exchange between individuals of legally acquired content is excluded from the scope of this Directive.
Za namene te direktive pomeni "kršitev v trgovinsko pomembnem obsegu"kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine iz koristoljubja, ki povzroči imetniku te pravice znatno neposredno izgubo.
For the purposes of this Directive, "infringement on a commercial scale" means for-profit infringement of an intellectual property right which causes significant direct loss to the holder of that right.
Kljub temu, da sporazum TRIPS ne opredeljuje "trgovinsko pomembnega obsega", umeščenost v besedilo TRIPS-a, uporaba tega izraza čez celotno besedilo in analiza pogajalskega procesa sporazuma povsem pojasnijo opredelitev.
Though the TRIPS Agreement does not define what is meant by 'commercial scale', the context of the TRIPS, the use of that expression throughout the whole text, and the analysis of the negotiation process of the TRIPS make the definition clear.
Za namene te direktive pomeni "namerna kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine" premišljeno in zavestno kršitev te pravice.
For the purposes of this Directive, "intentional infringement of an intellectual property right" means deliberate and knowing infringement of that right.
Za namene te direktive "ponarejanje" vključuje:
For the purposes of this Directive, 'counterfeiting' includes:
(a) posedovanje brez utemeljenega razloga, uvažanje (ne glede na carinski režim) ali izvažanje blaga pod ponarejeno blagovno znamko;
(a) holding with no legitimate reason, importing under any customs arrangements or exporting goods presented under a counterfeit trade mark;
(b) ponujanje ali prodaja blaga pod ponarejeno blagovno znamko;
(b) offering for sale or selling goods presented under a counterfeit trade mark;
(c) ponovna proizvodnja, posnemanje, uporaba, nameščanje, odstranjevanje, spreminjanje blagovne znamke, skupinske blagovne znamke ali certificirane skupinske blagovne znamke, kar pomeni kršenje pravic, pridobljenih z registracijo , in prepovedi, ki iz tega sledijo;
(c) reproducing, imitating, using, affixing, deleting or modifying a trade mark, a collective mark or a certified collective mark in violation of the rights conferred by the registration thereof and of the prohibitions stemming therefrom;
(d) zavestno dostavljanje proizvodov ali nudenje storitev, ki imajo drugačno blagovno znamko od tistih proizvodov in storitev, ki so bile zahtevane.
(d) knowingly supplying a product or service having a different registered trade mark from that of the producet or service requested.
Izvajanje sankcij je možno le, če obstaja jasna opredelitev pojma ponarejanja, ki mora vsebovati vse oblike kršitev prava intelektualne lastnine, vključno s posedovanjem ponarejenega blaga.
Penalties can be applied only if there is a clear definition of the concept of counterfeiting, which has to cover all types of infringement of intellectual property rights, including holding counterfeit goods..
Države članice zagotovijo, da opredelijo kot kaznivo dejanje katero koli namerno kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine, storjeno na področju trgovine , pa tudi poskus take kršitve, pomoč oziroma podporo in spodbujanje k taki kršitvi .
Member States shall ensure that all intentional infringements of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale , and attempting, aiding or abetting and inciting such infringements, are treated as criminal offences .
Države članice zagotovijo, da opredelijo kot kaznivo dejanje namerno kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine, storjeno v trgovinsko pomembnem obsegu.
Member States shall ensure that the intentional infringement of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale is treated as a criminal offence .
Kazenske sankcije za pomoč in napeljevanje k kaznivim dejanjem je treba hraniti za najhujša kazniva dejanja; kaznovati pomoč in napeljevanje h kršitvi pravic intelektualne lastnine bi lahko bilo nesorazmerno.
Criminal sanctions for abetting and inciting any criminal act must be reserved for the most serious crimes; to penalize abetting and inciting could be disproportionate in case of infringement of intellectual property rights.
Nadalje države članice zagotovijo, da se poskus, pomoč, napeljevanje in spodbujanje storitve takih kršitev obravnavajo kot kazniva dejanja, če poskus, pomoč, napeljevanje in spodbujanje:
Furthermore, Member States shall ensure that attempting, aiding or abetting and inciting such infringements are treated as criminal offences where the attempting, aiding or abetting or inciting:
(a) nudijo pomoč organizirani kriminaliteti, ali
(a) is conducted for the purposes of assisting organised crime, or
b) povzročijo resno grožnjo zdravju ali varnosti.
(b) constitutes a serious threat to health or safety .
Pomembno je ločevati med kršitvami patentov med običajno trgovsko dejavnostjo (legitimno razvijanje izdelkov), kar lahko privede do kršitve neveljavnih patentov, in ponarejanjem ter piratstvom z goljufivim naklepom, ki jih pogosto izvršujejo hudodelske združbe.
It is important to distinguish between patent infringements in the normal course of commercial activity (legitimate development of products) that can lead to invalid breaking of patents and counterfeiting and piracy with fraudulent and deliberate intent, which are often carried out by criminal organizations.
Kazenskih sankcij se ne sme uporabiti v primerih vzporednega uvoza izvirnega blaga, ki se trži s privolitvijo imetnika pravice intelektualne lastnine v tretji državi.
Criminal penalties are not to be applied in cases of the parallel importation of original goods which have been marketed with the agreement of the holder of the intellectual property rights therein in a third country.
Člen 4, odstavek 2, uvodni stavek
Article 4, paragraph 2, introductory sentence
Za kazniva dejanja iz člena 3 države članice določijo, da se v ustreznih primerih uporabijo tudi naslednje kazni:
For the offences referred to in Article 3, the Member States shall provide that the following penalties are also available in appropriate cases:
Za kazniva dejanja iz člena 3 države članice določijo, da se v ustreznih primerih uporabijo tudi naslednje kazni, v kolikor je to v javnem interesu :
For the offences referred to in Article 3, the Member States shall provide that the following penalties are also available in appropriate cases , where the public interest so requires :
Gre za pomembne kršitve temeljnih pravic, zato mora splošni interes to upravičevati.
This involves significant infringements of fundamental rights, which should therefore be justified on the grounds of general interest.
(a) uničenje premoženja , ki je povzročilo kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine;
(a) destruction of the goods infringing an intellectual property right;
(a) takojšnje popolno uničenje vsega blaga , ki je povzročilo kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine, z ohranitvijo dokaznih vzorcev, brez kavcije ;
(a) speedy destruction of all goods infringing an intellectual property right , save for the retention, without bond, of samples to be used in evidence ;
Zaradi varnosti je predlagano popolno in hitro uničenje premoženja, ki je povzročilo kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine, razen elementov, ki so potrebni za preiskavo.
On safety grounds, it is proposed that all the goods infringing an intellectual property right be speedily destroyed, except for items needed for the purpose of the investigation.
S takim ukrepom se je tudi možno izogniti pretirano velikim stroškom skladiščenja.
This measure also avoids the need for costly arrangements for guarding the goods.
Vizualni pregled nad zalogami je možen s pomočjo fotografskih posnetkov v trenutku odkritja.
A visual record of the stock can be made by photographing it when it is discovered.
Če je potrebno, se uničenje zalog lahko izvede z dovoljenjem ali brez nasprotovanja kršitelja, če je ugotovljena njegova identiteta, ne da bi to pomenilo priznavanje krivde.
If appropriate, the destruction of the stock may be subject to the consent, or non-opposition, of the alleged perpetrator, if s/he is identified at that stage, without this constituting an admission of guilt.
(fa) nalog, s katerim se od kršitelja se zahteva plačilo stroškov za hrambo zaplenjenega blaga.
(fa) an order requiring the infringer to pay the costs of keeping seized goods.
Člen 5, odstavek 2, točki (a) in (b)
Article 5, paragraph 2, points (a) and (b)
a) znaša najvišja najmanj 100 000 EUR za primere, ki niso najhujši;
(a) to a maximum of at least EUR 100 000 for cases other than the most serious cases;
(b) znaša najvišja najmanj 300 000 EUR za primere iz odstavka 1.
(b) to a maximum of at least EUR 300 000 for cases referred to in paragraph 1.