natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
D. ker ima člen 21 Listine o temeljnih pravicah, ki je vključen v člen II-81 ustavne pogodbe, širši pomen kot člen 13 Pogodbe ES, saj v nasprotju s členom 13 navaja razloge za diskriminacijo, kot so barva kože, socialno poreklo, genetske značilnosti, jezik, politično ali drugo prepričanje, pripadnost narodnostni manjšini, gmotno stanje in rojstvo; ker toliko bolj obžaluje, da to bolj razširjeno pojmovanje v praksi nima pravno zavezujoče oblike,
D. whereas Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (which has been incorporated into Article II-81 of the Constitutional Treaty) has a wider scope than Article 13 of the EC Treaty, insofar as it mentions grounds for discrimination which are omitted from Article 13 - namely colour, social origin, genetic features, language, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property and birth; regretting all the more that this broader concept has not been translated into a legally binding practical application,
E. ker se morajo države članice, kot je nedavno opozorila mreža strokovnjakov, pri izvajanju zakonodajnih instrumentov, sprejetih na podlagi člena 13 Pogodbe ES, obvezati in spoštovati temeljne pravice, določene v splošnih načelih prava ES, vključno s pravicami, svoboščinami in načeli, navedenimi v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
E. whereas, as recalled recently by the network of experts, in the implementation of the legislative instruments adopted on the basis of Article 13 of the EC Treaty, the Member States must undertake to comply with the fundamental rights enshrined in the general principles of EC law, including the rights, freedoms and principles mentioned in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
F. ker se zaveda, da se s prednostno obravnavo nekaterih vrst diskriminacije na zakonodajni ravni ustvarja neke vrste hierarhija razlogov za diskriminacijo, ki je ne bi smelo biti,
F. aware of the fact that granting preferential legislative treatment to certain types of discrimination has the effect of placing grounds for discrimination in a kind of hierarchy which should not exist,
G. ker opozarja, da obstajajo različni načini razumevanja pojma diskriminacije na ravni posameznika ali ravni skupnosti in da zaščita pravic državljanov kot posameznikov ne vključuje enakih ukrepov kot zaščita interesov skupin posameznikov,
G. whereas there are different ways of understanding the concept of discrimination (depending on whether it is viewed from an individual or collective point of view) and whereas upholding the rights of citizens as individuals does not require the same action as upholding the interests of groups of individuals,
H. ker je treba opredeliti, kaj natančno so pozitivni ukrepi, in to še preden se sprejme odločitev o tem, ali je potrebno spreminjati zakonodajo, in če, na kakšen način; ker pozitivni ukrepi vključujejo tudi ukrepe za odpravo neenakosti in nezakonite diskriminacije in so hkrati instrument, usmerjen k spodbujanju uravnotežene zastopanosti prebivalstva v sektorjih in na ravneh, kjer mora biti vso prebivalstvo enakopravno zastopano; ker poudarja, da omenjeno načelo ne sme biti omejeno le na sektor zaposlovanja in mora presegati zgolj načelo enakosti med spoloma,
H. whereas it is important to define what is meant by positive action before deciding whether the law should change and if so how; whereas positive action comprises the measures to be taken to tackle inequality and unlawful discrimination and is a tool designed to promote balanced representation of people in areas and at levels where the population as a whole must be represented in equitable fashion; stressing that this concept must not be confined to the employment sector and must go beyond mere equality between the sexes,
I. ker je treba kulturo nediskriminacije spodbujati z izobraževanjem, ki zagovarja mir, nenasilje in medkulturni dialog;
I. whereas a culture of non-discrimination should be promoted through education that fosters peace, non-violence and intercultural dialogue,
J. ker se zaveda, da so za odpravljanje preteklih nepravičnosti ali diskriminacije morda potrebni začasni pozitivni ukrepi, ki izhajajo iz „proaktivnega“ razumevanja pojma pravičnosti in so lahko zelo raznoliki; ker opozarja, da je treba vzpostavitev kvot obravnavati kot skrajni ukrep, ki se ga lahko uporablja le v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, ob upoštevanju merila sorazmernosti,
J. aware of the fact that, in order to compensate for earlier injustices or discrimination, there may be a need for temporary recourse to positive measures based on a ‘proactive’ concept of justice and possibly taking very different forms; whereas the establishment of quotas must be regarded as an extreme measure which may be applied only in accordance with the case-law established by the European Court of Justice and with due regard to the proportionality criterion,
K. ker je z vidika nekaterih, še posebno prikrajšanih skupin v družbi, kot so Romi, ali skupin, katerim so kratene pravice, kot so nedržavljani, nujno sprejetje pozitivnih ukrepov ali celo posebne zakonodaje, če jim želimo zagotoviti učinkovito udeležbo v družbenem in predvsem političnem življenju, da bi lahko vplivali na odločitve, ki jih zadevajo,
K. whereas in the case of certain particularly disadvantaged groups in society (such as Roma) or ones who are denied their rights (such as non-citizens), the adoption of positive measures – even of specific legislation – is essential if such people are to be able to participate actively in the life of their society (especially in political life) and hence to influence the decisions which affect them,
L. ker opozarja na dejstvo, da je v nekaterih državah članicah ločevanje romskih otrok v posebne razrede ali ustanove, namenjene duševno prizadetim, oblika rasnega ločevanja in je zato nujno potrebna politika za odpravljanje ločevanja,
L. drawing attention to the fact that in certain Member States the practice of confining Romany children to special classes or to establishments set aside for the mentally handicapped smacks of racial segregation, and whereas a desegregation policy is required as a matter of urgency,
M. ker svetovalni odbor za okvirno konvencijo spodbuja uvajanje pozitivnih ukrepov v korist pripadnikov manjšin, ki so še zlasti prikrajšane,
M. whereas the Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention encourages the introduction of positive measures in favour of members of minorities who are particularly disadvantaged,
N. ker Odbor ZN za gospodarske, socialne in kulturne pravice meni, da so države pogodbenice Mednarodnega pakta o ekonomskih, socialnih in kulturnih pravicah zavezane, da na ustrezen način prednostno obravnavajo invalidne osebe, da bi dosegli njihovo polno udeležbo in enakost v družbi,
N. whereas the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights considers that there is an obligation for the States party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights to give appropriate preferential treatment to people with disabilities in order to achieve the objectives of full participation and equality within society for all persons with disabilities,
O. ker EUMC opozarja, da je dejanski obseg in naravo vprašanja rasizma še vedno težko ocenjevati zaradi neobstoječega ali neučinkovitega uradnega in neuradnega zbiranja podatkov v številnih državah članicah,
O. whereas the EUMC recalls that the true extent and nature of the problem of racism remains difficult to gauge, given the absence or ineffectiveness of both official and unofficial data collection in many Member States,
P. ker bo, kot poudarja Evropski center za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije, brez uradnih statistik o etnični in narodni pripadnosti ter religiji težko dobiti pravo sliko o diskriminaciji in uspehu politik proti njej; pomanjkanje ustreznih statističnih podatkov za ponazoritev in vrednotenje diskriminacije onemogoča oblikovanje strategije za nediskriminacijo, ki bi med drugim temeljila na pozitivnih ukrepih v korist teh skupin,
P. whereas, as the EUMC stresses, without official statistics on ethnic and national origin and on religion, a true insight into discrimination and the success of policies against it will be difficult to ascertain; the lack of sufficient statistical data to illustrate and evaluate discrimination makes it impossible to establish a non-discrimination strategy based, inter alia, on positive actions in favour of such groups,
Q. ker obdelavo osebnih podatkov na ravni Skupnosti ureja direktiva 95/46/ES in ker, kot je poudarila mreža strokovnjakov, med varstvom osebnih podatkov in spremljanjem diskriminacije s statističnimi sredstvi ni neskladja, če je cilj takega spremljanja boljše razumevanje prevelike ali premajhne zastopanosti nekaterih skupin v nekaterih sektorjih ali na nekaterih ravneh ter ugotavljanje napredka, zato da bi opredelili potrebo po delovanju in izbrali najučinkovitejši način delovanja,
Q. whereas the processing of personal data is regulated at Community level by means of Directive 95/46/EC and whereas as the network of experts stressed, there is no conflict between personal-data protection and the monitoring of discrimination through statistical means, insofar as the objective of such monitoring is to gain a better understanding of the over- or under-representation of certain groups in particular sectors or at certain levels, and to measure progress, in order to identify the need to act and to select the most effective course of action,
R. ker je za odkrivanje posredne diskriminacije, ki jo zakonodaja Skupnosti izrecno prepoveduje, treba zagotoviti podporo zanesljivih statističnih podatkov, zlasti o nekaterih skupinah s posebnimi značilnostmi; če statističnih podatkov ni na voljo, so morebitne žrtve posredne diskriminacije dejansko prikrajšane za orodje, ki je bistveno za priznavanje njihovih pravic,
R. whereas the detection of indirect forms of discrimination (which are explicitly banned under Community law) must be based upon reliable statistics relating in particular to certain groups with special characteristics; whereas any unavailability of statistics will in effect deny potential victims of indirect discrimination access to a tool which is essential if their rights are to be recognised,
T. ker poudarja, da sta enakost in pravica do življenja brez diskriminacije in rasizma temelja družbe, v katero so vsi njeni člani resnično vključeni; ker morajo biti ukrepi Unije s področja politike vključevanja in diskriminacije med seboj skladni; ker mora "vključevanje" sicer spoštovati tradicije in kulturne norme držav članic, vendar mora hkrati temeljiti na celovitem pristopu, ki so ga države članice leta 2004 potrdile v skupnih osnovnih načelih vključevanja,
T. pointing out that equality and the right to live free from discrimination and racism are central elements for a society in which all its members are well integrated; whereas the EU’s policies for integration and discrimination should be consistent with each other; whereas, whilst Member States’ traditions and cultural norms must be respected, ‘integration’ should be based on a comprehensive approach such as that agreed by the Member States in the Common Basic Principles on Integration of 2004,
Splošne ugotovitve
General considerations
3. meni, da bi bilo treba zbrati dobre prakse, ki jih na področju boja proti diskriminaciji izvajajo države članice in med katerimi so nekatere splošnejše, bolje zastavljene in bolj zasidrane kot druge, in zagotoviti, da se razširijo na osnovi opravljenih primerjalnih analiz; meni, da bi bilo v ta namen dobro okrepiti mrežo nacionalnih organov, pooblaščenih za boj proti diskriminaciji (Equinet), in vse države članice spodbujati, da v njej sodelujejo; meni, da bi nalogo zbiranja in razširjanja informacij, usklajevanja ter spodbujanja lahko dolgoročno zaupali agenciji za temeljne pravice;
Believes that the sound anti-discrimination practices introduced in the Member States, some of which are broader, stronger and more entrenched than others, should be brought together and disseminated by a process of benchmarking; believes that in this connection the network of Member State bodies responsible for combating discrimination (Equinet) could usefully be strengthened and that all the Member States should be encouraged to become involved in it; believes that the task of gathering and disseminating information and of providing coordination and impetus could eventually be entrusted to the Agency for Fundamental Rights;
6. obžaluje dejstvom, da Listina o temeljnih pravicah še vedno ni pravno zavezujoča, zato zahteva, da se to vprašanje reši; vztraja, da si mora Komisija pri sistematičnem in strogem nadzoru skladnosti svojih zakonodajnih dokumentov in predpisov z Listino o temeljnih pravicah še posebej prizadevati za odkrivanje vseh oblik neposredne in zlasti posredne diskriminacije različnih kategorij oseb, do katere bi lahko zakoni in predpisi privedli; meni, da bi morala Komisija izvesti oceno vpliva diskriminacije za vsak zakonodajni predlog, da bi tako zagotovila dosledno politiko vseh svojih generalnih direktoratov; meni, da mora agencija za temeljne pravice tesno sodelovati pri študijah o vplivu, ki se izvajajo v tem okviru;
Deplores the fact that the Charter of Fundamental Rights has not yet been made legally binding, and requests that this situation be remedied; is insistent that when the Commission performs the stringent, systematic checks which it has undertaken to carry out in order to ensure that its legislative and regulatory acts are compatible with the Charter of Fundamental Rights, it should make a particular effort to detect any form of discrimination (either direct or in particular indirect) which various categories of individual could suffer as a result of such acts; considers that the Commission should carry out a discrimination impact assessment on every legislative proposal to ensure policy consistency across the Commission DGs; thinks that the Agency for Fundamental Rights should be closely involved in the impact studies carried out in this connection;
8. poudarja, da pojmi „pozitivni ukrep“, „pozitivna enakost“ ali „deljena pravičnost“ zajemajo isto stvarnost, ki izhaja iz priznavanja, da v nekaterih primerih učinkovit boj proti diskriminaciji predpostavlja dejavno posredovanje organov za ponovno vzpostavitev resno ogroženega ravnotežja; vztraja pri dejstvu, da ta vrsta posredovanja ne sme postati ena od oblik diskriminacije, tudi če je „pozitivna“, in da pojma pozitivnega ukrepa ne moremo poenostaviti na zamisel o kvoti; opozarja, da se lahko ti ukrepi dejansko uresničijo v zelo različnih oblikah, kot so zagotavljanje zaposlitvenih razgovorov, prednostni dostop do usposabljanj za poklice, v katerih so nekatere kategorije premalo zastopane, prednostno razširjanje ponudbe dela v nekaterih skupnostih ali večje upoštevanje delovnih izkušenj in ne le diplom;
Points out that the concepts of ‘positive action’, ‘affirmative equality’ and ‘distributive justice’ reflect one and the same reality, the basis of which is an acknowledgement of the fact that in certain cases, effective action to combat discrimination requires active intervention by the authorities for the purpose of restoring a seriously compromised balance; stresses that intervention of this kind must not be regarded as a form of discrimination (not even as a ‘positive’ form) and that the concept of positive action cannot be reduced to the idea of a quota; points out that such actions may in practice take the most varied forms, such as a guarantee of recruitment interviews, priority access to certain types of training leading to jobs in which certain categories of people are under-represented, priority notification of job vacancies to certain communities and the taking into account of work experience rather than qualifications alone;
11. poudarja, da je treba romskim priseljencem in nedržavljanom zagotoviti enakost na področju socialnih in političnih pravic, ter države članice in države kandidatke poziva, da oblikujejo strategijo za povečanje udeležbe Romov in nedržavljanov na volitvah v vlogi volivcev in kandidatov, in sicer na vseh ravneh;
Stresses the fact that migrants of Roma origin and non-citizens must be granted equality in terms of social and political rights and calls upon the Member States and the applicant countries to draw up a strategy designed to increase the involvement of Roma and non‑citizens in elections (as both voters and candidates) at all levels;
13. ocenjuje, da direktiva 95/46/ES ne ovira zbiranja podatkov, zlasti tistih v zvezi z etnično pripadnostjo in religijo, ampak omogoča nujno in priporočljivo zaščito pred vsemi oblikami zlorab pri uporabi občutljivih podatkov, zabeleženih v statistične namene;
Considers that far from constituting an obstacle to the collection of data relating in particular to ethnic origin and to religion, Directive 95/46/EC provides necessary and desirable protection against any abuse of sensitive data collected for statistical purposes;
17. z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da namerava Komisija v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi organi in drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi oblikovati statistična orodja, namenjena ocenjevanju posledic diskriminacije; z zanimanjem pričakuje objavo priročnika o zbiranju podatkov, ki je predvidena za leto 2006;
Notes with satisfaction that the Commission intends to create (in cooperation with the Member States’ authorities and other parties involved) statistics tools designed to assess the impact of discrimination; awaits with interest the publication of the data-collection handbook which is scheduled for 2006;
20. države članice poziva k razvoju lastnih statističnih orodij, da bodo razpolagala s podatki o zaposlitvi, stanovanjskih razmerah, izobraževanju in dohodkih vsake od skupin oseb, ki se srečujejo z diskriminacijo na podlagi enega od meril, navedenih v členu 13 Pogodbe ES;
Calls upon the Member States to develop their statistics tools with a view to ensuring that data relating to employment, housing, education and income are available for each of the categories of individual which are likely to suffer discrimination based on one of the criteria listed in Article 13 of the EC Treaty;
Potreba po dopolnitvi zakonodaje
Need for supplementary legislation
23. države članice poziva, da v svoji zakonodajni praksi ustrezno upoštevajo različne razloge za diskriminacijo, povzete v členu 21 listine, da bi listini tako omogočili verodostojnost, ki je sicer oslabljena zaradi njenega pravno nezavezujočega značaja;
Calls upon the Member States to take due account in their legislative practice of the various grounds for discrimination set out in Article 21 of the Charter with a view to bestowing a credibility upon that Charter which has hitherto been weakened by the fact that the Charter is not legally binding;
29. poziva Svet, da sprejme predlog Komisije za Okvirni sklep Sveta o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji, ki opredeljuje oblikovanje okvira za kaznovanje rasističnega in ksenofobičnega nasilja kot kaznivega dejanja, saj bi ta sklep prispeval k povečanju zbiranja potrebnih podatkov o rasističnem nasilju in kaznivih dejanjih v EU ;
Calls on the Council to adopt the Commission’s proposal for a Council Framework Decision on Combating Racism and Xenophobia, which sets out to establish a framework for punishing racist and xenophobic violence as a criminal offence, as this Decision would contribute to the enhancement of necessary data collection on racist violence and crime across the EU;
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov (*)
OPINION of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (*)
o okvirni strategiji za nediskriminacijo in enake možnosti za vse
on non-discrimination and equal opportunities for all
Odbor za pravice žensk in enakost spolov poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost,
- having regard to Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2000/78/ES z dne 27. novembra 2000 o splošnih okvirih enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu,
- having regard to Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/73/ES z dne 23. septembra 2002 o spremembi Direktive Sveta 76/207/EGS o izvrševanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk v zvezi z dostopom do zaposlitve, poklicnega usposabljanja in napredovanja ter delovnih pogojev,
- having regard to Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2004/113/ES z dne 13. decembra 2004 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri dostopu do blaga in storitev ter oskrbi z njimi,
- having regard to Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services,
– ob upoštevanju člena 23 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
- having regard to Article 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
A. ker je spoštovanje človeškega dostojanstva, iz katerega izhaja enakost med ženskami in moškimi, temeljno načelo zakonodaje Skupnosti in ker je v členu 3(2) Pogodbe ES opredeljeno načelo integracije enakosti med spoloma, v skladu s katerim si Skupnost v vseh svojih dejavnostih prizadeva odpraviti neenakosti in spodbujati enakost med moškimi in ženskami; ker je treba izvajati kohezivno politiko enakosti, ki bo povečala vrednost obstoječih programov in pobud, ki se že izvajajo,
A. whereas equality between men and women, which derives from respect for human dignity, is a fundamental principle of Community law and Article 3(2) of the EC Treaty lays down the principle of gender mainstreaming by stating that, in all its activities, the Community shall aim to eliminate inequalities and to promote equality between men and women, whereas there is a need to implement a cohesive equality policy which gives added value to existing programmes and to initiatives already in progress,
B. ker je Komisija predlagala, da se leto 2007 razglasi za evropsko leto enakih možnostih za vse,
B. whereas the Commission has proposed that the year 2007 be designated ‘European Year of Equal Opportunities for All,
4. poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo enak dostop žensk in moških do vseh ravni izobraževanja, poklicnega usposabljanja in poklicnega izpopolnjevanja ter preprečijo diskriminacijo deklet in fantov pri poklicnem svetovanju in kakovosti zagotovljenega izobraževanja;
Calls on the Member States to ensure equal access for women and men to all levels of vocational training, professional training and advanced training and that no discrimination is made between girls and boys in the career guidance on offer and in the quality of the education provided;
8. poziva države članice, naj uresničijo sprejete obveznosti, ki so bile potrjene na Evropskem svetu 2002 v Barceloni, naj sprejmejo ukrepe za odpravo razlik v plačah med spoloma in zagotovijo enak dostop žensk do izobraževanja, kvalificiranih in kakovostnih delovnih mest ter enako obravnavo pri vprašanju plačila;
Calls on the Member States to act on the commitments they made, which were approved by the Barcelona European Council in 2002, to take measures to eliminate the wage differential between the sexes and to ensure women’s equal access to vocational training and to qualified and quality jobs as well as guaranteeing equal treatment in terms of salary;