natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ..........................................................................30
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................32
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 34
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 36
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in ENAKOST SPOLOV ..................................37
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...40
MNENJE EVROPSKEGA EKONOMSKO-SOCIALNEGA ODBORA................................40
OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE......................43
MNENJE ODBORA REGIJ.....................................................................................................56
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS..........................................................58
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe iz Nice,
– having regard to the Treaty of Nice,
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji,
– having regard to the Treaty concerning the Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij o obdobju za razmislek z dne 13. oktober 2005
– having regard to the opinions on the period of reflection delivered by the Committee of the Regions on 13 October 2005
4 P6_PV(2005)09-06, še ni bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
P6_PV(2005)09-06, not yet published in the Official Journal. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za regionalni razvoj, Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje, Odbora za pravne zadeve, Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6‑0414/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, the Committee on Culture and Education, the Committee on Legal Affairs, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0414/2005 ),
A. so 29. oktobra 2004 Pogodbo o Ustavi za Evropo podpisali voditelji držav in vlad 25 držav članic Evropske unije in jo je Evropski svet ponovno potrdil s svojo izjavo z dne 18. junija 2005,
A. The Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe was signed by the Heads of State and Government of the twenty-five Member States of the European Union on 29 October 2004, and confirmed again by the European Council in its Declaration of 18 June 2005,
B. je osnutek Ustave pripravila Evropska konvencija, ki je v primerjavi s prejšnjimi postopki za pripravo novih pogodb dosegla novo raven odprtosti, pluralizma in demokratične legitimnosti,
B. The Constitution was drafted by the European Convention which, compared to previous procedures to prepare new treaties, achieved new levels of openness, pluralism and democratic legitimacy,
C. je Evropski parlament podprl Ustavo z več kot dvotretjinsko večino kot "dober kompromis, ki vodi k opaznemu izboljšanju veljavnih pogodb ... [in ki bo] zagotovila trden in trajen okvir za prihodnji razvoj Evropske unije, ki bo omogočil nadaljnje širitve, obenem pa ponudil mehanizme za njeno revizijo, kadar bo ta potrebna",
C. The European Parliament endorsed the Constitution by a majority of over two-thirds as "a good compromise and a vast improvement on the existing treaties … [which] will provide a stable and lasting framework for the future development of the European Union that will allow for further enlargement while providing mechanisms for its revision when needed" in its Resolution of 12 January 2005,
D. reforme, ki jih predvideva Pogodba o Ustavi za Evropo so med drugim namenjene obvladovanju posledic širitve Unije 1. maja 2004, uspeh te in prihodnjih širitev pa brez ratifikacije Ustavne pogodbe ne bo dosežen,
D. The reforms for which the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe provides are intended, inter alia, to cope with the consequences of the enlargement of the Union on 1 May 2004, and the success of this and future enlargements will be in jeopardy unless a constitutional package is ratified,
E. je trinajst držav članic
E. Thirteen Member States
G. člen 48 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji določa, da Ustava ne bo začela veljati, razen če in dokler je ne ratificirajo vse države članice,
G. Under Article 48 of the Treaty on European Union, the Constitution will not enter into force unless and until it is ratified by all Member States,
I. je treba spoštovati tiste države članice in njihove narode, ki so ratificirali Ustavo, in tudi tiste, ki je niso, ter natančno analizirati razloge za negativna izida v Franciji in na Nizozemskem,
I. It is necessary to respect those Member States and their peoples which have ratified the Constitution as well as those which have not, and to analyse carefully the reasons for the negative results in France and the Netherlands,
J. se zdi, da je bilo glasovanje PROTI bolj izraz nezadovoljstva zaradi trenutnega stanja Unije kot izrecno nasprotovanje ustavnim reformam, vendar pa se zaradi izida tega glasovanja paradoksalno ohranja status quo in onemogočajo reforme,
J. The No votes appear to have been rather more an expression of dissent at the present state of the Union than a specific objection to the constitutional reforms, but, paradoxically, the result of the Noes is to maintain the status quo and block reform,
K. je Evropski svet v svoji izjavi z dne 18. junija 2005 to analizo potrdil in sprejel stališče, da "ti izidi ne postavljajo pod vprašaj privrženosti državljanov izgradnji Evrope", ampak da "so vendarle izrazili zaskrbljenost in bojazni, ki jih je treba upoštevati"; Evropski svet se je zato odločil za obdobje za razmislek , da bi omogočil "široko razpravo, v katero bodo vključeni državljani, civilna družba, socialni partnerji, državni parlamenti in politične stranke"; voditelji vlad pa so se strinjali, da bodo v prvi polovici leta 2006 "ocenili vse razprave v državah članicah in se dogovorili o nadaljnjem postopku",
K. The European Council confirmed this analysis by taking the view, in its Declaration of 18 June 2005, that ‘these results do not call into question citizens’ attachment to the construction of Europe’ but that ‘citizens have nevertheless expressed concerns and worries which need to be taken into account’; the European Council therefore decided on a ‘period of reflection ... to enable a broad debate to take place in each of our countries, involving citizens, civil society, social partners, national parliaments and political parties’; the heads of government agreed that in the first half of 2006 they would ‘make an overall assessment of the national debates and agree on how to proceed’,
L. so v tej izjavi voditelji vlad izjavili, da se postopek ratifikacije lahko nadaljuje, in se tudi strinjali, da je treba podaljšati prvotni rok za začetek veljavnosti Ustave (1. november 2006),
L. In that Declaration, the heads of government declared that the ratification process could continue, and also agreed that the original timetable for the entry into force of the Constitution (1 November 2006) would be extended,
N. odsotnost sporazuma o političnih izzivih in proračunskih sredstvih razširjene Unije za obdobje 2007–2013 nadalje spodkopava sedanjo in prihodnjo Unijo,
N. The absence of an agreement on the policy challenges and budgetary means of the enlarged Union for the period 2007-2013 further undermines the present and future Union,
O. se je obdobje za razmislek začelo z razpravo o kontekstu, ne o besedilu, z vprašanji, kot so prihodnost evropskega socialnega modela, evropske gospodarske možnosti, hitrost širitve, srednjeročni proračun in enotni trg na področju storitev – vprašanji, ki brez izjeme stojijo v ospredju,
O. The period of reflection has started with debates on the context rather than the text, with issues such as the future of the European social model, European economic prospects, the speed of enlargement, the medium term budget and the single market in services, all featuring prominently,
P. je Evropska komisija objavila svoj prispevek o obdobju za razmislek s ciljem, da s podpiranjem nacionalnih razprav in spodbujanjem pobud na ravni Skupnosti ponovno vzpostavi zaupanje javnosti v Evropsko unijo, vendar pa to ne bi smelo odvrniti vseh evropskih političnih institucij od skupnega prizadevanja ali vodenja, ki resno obravnava strateški pomen Ustave in politično realnost pogojev, od katerih je odvisen njen uspeh,
P. The Commission has published its contribution on the period of reflection with the aim of restoring public confidence in the European Union by supporting national debates and promoting initiatives at community level, but this should not prevent all of Europe’s political institutions from making a combined effort or from exercising leadership which takes seriously the strategic importance of the Constitution and the political reality of the preconditions upon which its success depends,
Q. so nacionalni parlamenti izrazili svojo podporo vrsti skupnih parlamentarnih srečanj, na katerih bodo spodbujali, usmerjali in sintetizirali evropski dialog,
Q. The national parliaments have declared their support for a series of joint parliamentary meetings that will 'stimulate, steer and synthesize' the European dialogue
7. opozarja, da lahko strategija, ki temelji na selektivnem izvajanju Ustave, uniči soglasje, s katerim je bilo doseženo ravnotežje med institucijami in med državami članicami, s čimer bi se zaostrila kriza zaupanja;
Warns that a strategy based on the selective implementation of the Constitution risks destroying the consensus that achieved a balance between the institutions and among Member States, thereby aggravating the crisis of confidence;
10. pozdravlja začetke široke razprave o smeri politike Unije, vendar poudarja, da mora razprava potekati v okviru premagovanja ustavne krize in da morajo biti politične določbe na ravni EU neposredno povezane s pravili, pooblastili in postopki institucij EU ter s pristojnostmi, ki jih države članice prenesejo na EU, in morajo opredeliti vprašanja, ki so skupna vsej Evropi;
Welcomes the beginnings of a broad debate about the Union's policy direction but stresses that this must take place within the context of overcoming the constitutional crisis, and that policy prescriptions at EU level must relate directly to the rules, powers and procedures of the EU institutions as well as to the competences conferred on the EU by the Member States and should identify the issues that are common throughout Europe;
13. predlaga, da Evropski parlament nacionalne parlamente povabi na vrsto konferenc – parlamentarne forume –, da bi spodbudili razpravo in postopoma oblikovali potrebne politične zaključke; druge institucije EU bodo povabljene k sodelovanju na forumih;
Proposes that the European Parliament invite national parliaments to a series of conferences – ‘Parliamentary Forums’ – in order to stimulate the debate and to shape, step by step, the necessary political conclusions; will invite the other EU institutions to contribute to the Forums;
15. priznava, da je strateškega pomena, da politične institucije spodbujajo proaktiven odnos medijev (zlasti televizije, tiska in lokalnih radijskih postaj) in da si zagotovijo njihovo sodelovanje pri oglaševanju in krepitvi razprave;
Recognises that it is strategically important for political institutions to encourage a pro-active attitude on the part of the media (in particular television, the press and local radio) and to enlist them for the purpose of publicising and intensifying the debate;
17. predlaga, da bi moral prvi parlamentarni forum določiti omejeno število prednostnih vprašanj o prihodnosti Evrope in upravljanju Unije, ki jih je treba obravnavati na naslednjih forumih in v široki javni razpravi, in sicer:
Proposes that the first Parliamentary Forum should identify a limited number of priority questions about the future of Europe and the governance of the Union which should be addressed in subsequent Forums and in the broader public debate, such as:
(i) kaj je cilj evropske integracije?
(i) what is the goal of European integration?
(ii) kakšno vlogo bi morala imeti Evropa v svetu?
(ii) what role should Europe have in the world?
(iii) kakšna je prihodnost evropskega socialnega in gospodarskega modela glede na globalizacijo?
(iii) in the light of globalisation, what is the future of the European social and economic model?
(iv) kako definirati meje Evropske unije?
(iv) how do we define the boundaries of the European Union?
(v) kako povečati svobodo, varnost in pravičnost?
(v) how do we enhance freedom, security and justice?
20. državam članicam naroča, naj s pomočjo Komisije na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni organizirajo številna javna srečanja in razprave v medijih o prihodnosti Evrope – državljanske forume, ki obravnavajo sporazumno dogovorjene teme; poziva socialne partnerje in organizacije civilne družbe, da sodelujejo v teh razpravah;
Requests Member States to organise a large number of public meetings and media debates on the future of Europe ‑ 'Citizens' Forums' ‑ at national, regional and local level, structured along the commonly agreed themes, with the assistance of the Commission; urges the social partners and civil society organisations to get engaged in these debates;
29. je seznanjen z načrtom D za demokracijo, dialog in debato ( KOM(2005)0494 ), ki ga je pripravila Evropska komisija, vendar jo poziva, naj poleg svoje komunikacijske strategije pokaže odločno politično zavezo, da pomaga Uniji premagati trenutne ustavne težave;
Takes note of Commission’s ‘Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate’( COM(2005)0494 ), but calls on the Commission not only to deliver its communications strategy but also to show decisive political commitment to help the Union emerge from its current constitutional difficulties;
32. v vsakem primeru zahteva, da si je treba močno prizadevati, da bo Ustava začela veljati leta 2009;
Demands in any case that every effort be made to ensure that the Constitution enters into force during 2009;
34. v tem duhu prosi Odbor za ustavne zadeve, naj tesno sodeluje z vsemi ostalimi odbori, ki se neposredno zanimajo za pripravo parlamentarnih forumov in delovnih dokumentov zanje;
In this spirit, asks the Constitutional Affairs Committee to work closely with all other committees directly interested in the preparation of the Parliamentary Forums and the drafting of the working documents for them;
PISMO ODBORA ZA EKONOMSKE IN MONETARNE ZADEVE
LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS
Pismo z 12. oktobra 2005 predsednice Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve Pervenche Berès predsedniku Odbora za ustavne zadeve Joju Leinenu.
Letter of 12 October 2005 from Mrs Pervenche Berès, chairwoman of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, to Mr Jo Leinen, chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs
Predsednik Odbora za ustavne zadeve
Chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs
RE: Obdobje za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji (INI/2005/2146)
Subject: The period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union ( INI/2005/2146)
Spoštovani gospod predsednik!
Dear Chairman,
Vaš odbor trenutno pripravlja samoiniciativno poročilo o dokumentu Obdobje za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji (INI/2005/2146), za katerega sta soporočevalca Andrew Duff in Johannes Voggenhuber.
Your committee is currently working on an own-initiative report on the period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union (INI/2005/2146), for which Andrew Duff and Johannes Voggenhuber are co-rapporteurs.
S tem v zvezi ste nekatere odbore, med drugim tudi našega, vprašali, ali smo pripravljeni prispevati z mnenjem, ki bi ga pripravili v najkrajšem možnem času.
In this connection you asked several committees, including ours, whether they wanted to contribute to the report by submitting an opinion without delay.
Naš odbor si pridržuje torej možnost, da sodeluje pri morebitnem poročilu, ki ga boste pripravili, in prispeva z mnenjem s področja naše pristojnosti, povezane zlasti s procesom Lamfalussy in komitologijo.
Our committee may therefore intervene in the context of any report that you may draw up on that subject and contribute an opinion dealing with the fields under our competence, in particular those linked to the Lamfalussy procedure and comitology.
Vendar lahko naše stališče spremenimo, če se izkaže, da boste v razpravi v vašem odboru natančneje obravnavali predloge iz vašega poročila.
However, we may review our position if it turns out that the debate in your committee leads it to deal in detail with the proposals to be made for the future.
PISMO ODBORA ZA PROMET IN TURIZEM
LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT AND TOURISM
Spoštovani sodelavec,
Dear Colleague,
z zadovoljstvom ugotavljam, da bo vaš odbor pripravil poročilo o obdobju razmisleka po francoski in nizozemski zavrnitvi predloga evropske ustave.
I was pleased to learn that your committee intended to draw up a report on the period of reflection that was introduced after the rejection of the European Constitution by the electorates of France and the Netherlands.
V imenu odbora TRAN bi vam rad posredoval mnenje za poročilo gospodov DUFFA in VOGGENHUBERJA.
On behalf of the Committee on Transport, I would like to convey to you our opinion regarding the report by Mr Duff and Mr Voggenhuber.
Pozdravljamo odločitev Parlamenta, da prevzame pobudo v tej razpravi.
We are pleased that Parliament is taking the initiative in this debate.
Ker imajo države članice deljena mnenja o tej temi, Komisija pa se obotavlja, da bi prevzela pobudo, bi moral Parlament, ki predstavlja državljane Evrope, ponovno sprožiti razpravo.
Since the Member States are divided on the subject and the Commission seems to be reluctant to take the initiative, Parliament, which represents the peoples of Europe, should relaunch the debate.
Pozdravljamo uvodne misli vaših poročevalcev, ki, čeprav zelo ambiciozno, poudarjajo nujnost, da ima razprava svoj oblikovni in časovni okvir.
In this connection, we welcome your rapporteur's preliminary ideas which, although ambitious, stress the need for a clear structure and timetable for the debate.
S stališča našega odbora je pomembno, da se konkretno oblikovanje politike nadaljuje in, kjer je možno, stopnjuje.
In our committee's opinion, it is important that the preparation of tangible policies be continued and strengthened where possible.
Državljani dveh držav članic so pokazali svoje neodobravanje predloga evropske ustave, vendar ne evropskega sodelovanja in vključevanja kot sredstev za reševanje skupnih problemov.
The citizens of the two Member States expressed their disapproval of the draft European Constitution, but not of European cooperation and integration, which are considered to be ways of solving the shared problems.
Medtem morajo evropske institucije delovati tako, da bodo ponovno pridobile zaupanje javnosti v evropski načrt.
For the present, the European institutions must take action to restore the public's confidence in the European project.
Primerna je boljša komunikacija, predvsem za zavračanje lažnih argumentov, ki jih uporabljajo šibki nacionalni politiki, ki krivijo Bruselj za svoje neuspehe.
Better communication is needed, in particular in order to combat the false argument put forward by second-rate national leaders who blame Brussels for their own failures.
Vendar kar najbolj potrebujemo, je uspešno delovanje na področjih, ki so najpomembnejša za evropskega človeka.
But what we need most is effective measures in the fields that European citizens see as important.
Evropske institucije bi morale sedaj izpolniti svoje strateške cilje, kljub temu, da so trenutno prisiljene uporabljati zastarela orodja, kot je pogodba iz Nice.
The European institutions should now work towards achieving their strategic objectives, even though they are for the moment obliged to use outdated instruments such as the Nice Treaty.
Drugič, morali bi priznati potrebo po večji jasnosti in preprostosti procesa odločanja v vseh institucijah, ter povečati, kjerkoli je to možno, našo neposredno odgovornost ljudem, brez posredovanja nacionalnih vlad.
We should, furthermore, recognise the need for greater transparency and simplification of the decision-making process in all the institutions concerned, by being answerable, as far as possible, directly to the citizens without the national governments acting as intermediaries.
Glede na to, da smo odbor, ki deluje predvsem pri postopkih soodločanja, menimo, da je to eden od elementov predloga ustave, ki naj bi se ohranil tudi v prihodnjih predlogih reforme.
As a committee which works essentially on the basis of the codecision procedure, we feel that it is an element of the draft Constitution that must be preserved in any future proposals for reform.
Postopek ratifikacije Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo
The ratification process of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
2. meni, da je ravno tako neizvedljiv vsakršen poskus ponovnih pogajanj o Ustavni pogodbi, ker ta že izraža najbolj uravnoteženo rešitev, ki jo je bilo mogoče doseči med pogajanji tako v okviru Evropske konvencije kot na kasnejših medvladnih konferencah, in jo je dejansko ratificirala že več kot polovica držav članic;
Considers equally impracticable any attempt to renegotiate the Constitutional Treaty since this already expresses the most balanced solution that could be achieved during the negotiations both within the European Convention and at the subsequent IGC, and has in fact already been ratified by more than half of the Member States;
4. predlaga, da Evropski parlament nemudoma in ob procesu razmisleka sproži in usklajuje pobudo „Prednost evropskim državljanom“, ki bo proaktivno usmerjena na sedanje skrbi in želje evropskih državljanov glede zadev EU; meni, da bi institucije s tako pobudo dobile možnost spodbujati pozitiven odnos na evropski ravni in tako preprečile, da nacionalistični pristop ponovno prevlada v evropski razpravi; poudarja, da se tako obširne pobude lahko lotimo in moramo lotiti na osnovi obstoječih pogodb, saj zahtevajo le politično soglasje;
Proposes that, in parallel to the reflection process, and without delay, the European Parliament launch and coordinate a ‘European Citizens First’ initiative, aimed at proactively addressing current concerns and wishes of European citizens on EU matters; is of the view that such an initiative would allow the institutions to foster a positive attitude at the European level in order to prevent the nationalist approach from prevailing once more in the European debate; underlines that such a wide-ranging initiative can and must be undertaken on the basis of the existing Treaties, only requiring political consensus;
(a) splošna razprava v Evropskem parlamentu o smernicah različnih evropskih politik na začetku vsakega leta, v kateri bodo sodelovali vsi voditelji vlad oziroma njihovi predstavniki in evropski komisarji,
(a) a general debate to take place at the beginning of every year in the European Parliament with the participation of all the Heads of Government or their representatives and European Commissioners on the guidelines of the different European policies,
(b) obsežne javne razprave v nacionalnih parlamentih o evropskih pobudah, ki še posebej zadevajo evropske državljane, kot so varnost ljudi, vključno z bojem proti terorizmu, širitvijo, priseljevanjem, socialnim modelom itd., za katere bi bilo zaželeno, da so združene v poseben „Dan evropske razprave“, ki bi bil uveden istočasno v vseh nacionalnih parlamentih, če je mogoče,
(b) extensive public debates in national parliaments on the European initiatives which especially concern European citizens such as human security including the fight against terrorism, enlargement, immigration, the social model, etc., preferably grouped in a specific "European debate day" to be established, possibly simultaneously, in each national parliament,