natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3.2 Smernice, kampanje ozaveščanja in druge nezakonodajne pobude lahko le delno pripomorejo k tem prizadevanjem; uporabiti bi jih morali kot dopolnitev direktiv
3.2 Guidelines, awareness campaigns and other non-legislative initiatives can only make a partial contribution; they should be used in addition to directives
Ker so zahteve opisane kot tehnična pravila in vključujejo izraze kot "naj bi" namesto, da bi določila zavezujoča priporočila, imajo majhen praktičen vpliv. .
As the requirements are worded as technical rules, however, using terms such as ‘should’, rather than defining mandatory requirements, they have had little practical impact. ;
Poročilo o evropski konkurenčnosti za leto 2004 ( SEC(2004)1397 ) potrjuje vedno večje pomanjkanje zdravstvenih delavcev, kar povzroča skrb po vsej Evropi.
The 2004 European Competitiveness Report ( SEC(2004)1397 ) acknowledges the escalating shortage of healthcare workers as a cause for concern throughout Europe.
b) US General Accounting Office, Impact assessment regarding Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act; 17. november, 2000
b) US General Accounting Office, Impact assessment regarding Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act; Nov 17, 2000
5.1 V Direktivo 2000/54/ES je treba vključiti naslednje določbe:
5.1 The following provisions should be inserted into Directive 2000/54/EC:
Brez poseganja v odstavek 2 in z udeležbo odgovornih zdravnikov si je v zdravstvenih in veterinarskih ustanovah treba prizadevati za sprejetje naslednjih ukrepov, da se zavaruje delavce pred poškodbami z iglami in drugimi ostrimi medicinskimi pripomočki:
Without prejudice to paragraph 2, and with the participation of the doctors responsible, moves should be made towards taking the following specific preventative measures in health and veterinary care facilities to protect workers from injuries caused by needles and other medical sharps
(b) na podlagi ocene tveganja si je treba prizadevati za učinkovito in usmerjeno uporabo pripomočkov z varnostnimi značilnostmi, če so ti na voljo, na področjih, kjer je posebej velika nevarnost nesreče ali okužbe, ob upoštevanju razmerja med stroški in koristmi;
(b) on the basis of risk-assessment moves should be made towards ensuring that appliances with safety features, where they exist, are used efficiently and in a targeted manner in areas with a particularly high risk of accidents or infection, taking into account the cost/benefit ratio;
(c) delovne prakse, ki pomenijo tveganje za poškodbo z iglo, se spremenijo tako, da so varnejše, in odpravi se ponovna uporaba igel;
(c) Work practices that pose a risk of needle injury shall be modified to make them safer and recapping needles shall be eliminated;
(f) na delovnem mestu je treba zagotoviti pisna navodila in po potrebi izobesiti obvestila o postopkih, ki jim je treba slediti v primeru nezgode ali incidenta z iglami ali drugimi ostrimi medicinskimi pripomočki;
(f) written instructions shall be provided at the workplace and, if appropriate, notices displayed communicating the procedures to be followed in the case of accident or incident involving needles and other medical sharps;
Preveri se, za koliko se je zaradi obvezne uvedbe zmanjšalo število poškodb in okužb na področjih s povečanim tveganjem okužbe in ali je treba uporabo tega člena razširiti na nadaljnja področja."
Studies should be conducted on the extent to which introduction of such devices in areas with high risk of infection have reduced the number of wounds and infections and whether further areas should be included in the field of application of this article.
Priporočila Komisiji o zaščiti evropskih zdravstvenih delavcev pred krvno prenosljivimi infekcijami, ki jih povzročajo injekcijske igle
Protecting European healthcare workers from blood borne infections due to needlestick injuries
Datum vrnitve zadeve odboru po členu 52(3)
Date referred back to committee under Rule 52(3)
Datum vrnitve zadeve odboru po členu 168
Date referred back to committee under Rule 168
Rok za poročanje
Deadline for reporting back
Poročevalec/-ka Datum imenovanja
Rapporteur(s) Date confirmed/appointed
o sporočilu Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru glede sprožitve razprave o pristopu Skupnosti k sistemu okoljskega označevanja za ribiške proizvode
on launching a debate on a Community approach towards eco-labelling schemes for fisheries products
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano .......................10
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY 11
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru glede sprožitve razprave o pristopu Skupnosti k sistemu okoljskega označevanja za ribiške proizvode ( KOM(2005)0275 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee launching a debate on a Community approach towards eco-labelling schemes for fisheries products ( COM(2005)0275 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,
– ob upoštevanju poročila št. 780 s 26. zasedanja Odbora za ribištvo Organizacije ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo, ki je bilo od 7. do 11. marca 2005 v Rimu,
– having regard to Report No 780 of the 26th session of the Committee on Fisheries of the FAO held in Rome from 7 to 11 March 2005,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o določitvi akcijskega načrta Skupnosti za vključitev zahtev glede varovanja okolja v skupno ribiško politiko ( KOM(2002)0186 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission setting out a Community action plan to integrate environmental protection requirements into the common fisheries policy ( COM(2002)0186 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o prihodnosti za trg ribiških proizvodov v Evropski uniji: odgovornosti, partnerstvu in konkurenčnosti ( KOM(1997)0719 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on 'The future for the market in fisheries products in the European Union: responsibility, partnership and competitiveness' ( COM(1997)0719 ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo in mnenja Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0219/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0219/2006 ),
A. ker lahko dajanje ribiških proizvodov v promet, podprto z zanesljivimi potrdili, da so bile živali ujete, gojene, nabrane ali predelane v skladu z merili za okoljsko trajnost, veliko pripomore k večji zavezanosti proizvajalcev in potrošnikov ciljem trajnostnega ribolova;
A. whereas the placing on the market of fishery products, substantiated by reliable certification that their capture, breeding, harvesting or processing are in accordance with environmental sustainability criteria, may contribute significantly to an increase in support from both producers and consumers for the objectives behind sustainable fishing,
B. ker pa ni enotnih, mednarodno priznanih meril, ki bi določala pomen trajnosti pri ribiških proizvodih,
B. whereas, however, there is no single internationally adopted criterion regarding the meaning of sustainability in relation to fishery products,
C. ker mora ekološki pristop kot del sistema okoljskega označevanja vedno temeljiti na širokem spektru ocen,
C. whereas an ecological approach as part of an eco-labelling scheme must always be based on broad-spectrum assessments,
D. ker mora sistem okoljskega označevanja in certificiranja dati prednost pojasnjevalnemu sistemu z več merili,
D. whereas an eco-labelling and certification scheme must give preference to a multi-criteria certification system ,
E. ker Organizacija ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo že od leta 1998 preučuje vidike okoljsko označenih ribiških in ribogojnih proizvodov in ker je njen odbor za ribištvo maja 2005 izdal v zvezi s tem smernice,
E. whereas the FAO has been considering the issue of eco-labelling for fisheries and aquaculture products since 1998, with its Committee on Fisheries issuing directives on the subject in May 2005,
F. ker se Svetovna trgovinska organizacija ukvarja s tem vprašanjem že od konference v Dohi leta 2001, kjer so države v razvoju jasno izrazile bojazen, da se bo iz okoljskega označevanja razvil nov zaščitniški mehanizem za izdelke iz bolj razvitih držav,
F. whereas the World Trade Organisation looked into the matter following the meeting in Doha in 2001, where it became clear that developing countries were concerned that an eco-labelling scheme could lead to a new protectionist mechanism for products from more developed countries,
G. ker lahko okoljsko označevanje ribiških proizvodov služi za izboljšanje zbiranja informacij o določenem ribištvu (izboljšanje količine in zanesljivosti podatkov),
G. whereas eco-labelling for fisheries products may serve to improve the gathering of information on specific fisheries (improvements to the quantity and reliability of data),
H. ker lahko raznolikost pojavljajočih se okoljskih oznak in meril okoljskega označevanja ter nezaupanje in zmeda, ki ju zbujajo pri potrošnikih, privedejo do tega, da bo to sredstvo izgubilo svojo veljavo,
H. whereas the numerous eco-labelling schemes and criteria relating to eco-labelling that are emerging, together with the lack of confidence and sense of confusion that this generates among consumers, may lead to the discrediting of this mechanism,
I. ker je Evropska skupnost pred kratkim podpisala sporazum o mednarodnem programu za ohranitev delfinov in s tem povezan sistem okoljskega certificiranja (varno za delfine),
I. whereas the European Community recently signed the Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Programme and the associated eco-certification scheme (Dolphin Safe),
J. ker se je tudi pokazalo, da obstaja zmeda glede tega, kaj je okoljska oznaka, kaj pa znak kakovosti,
J. whereas it has also been shown that there is confusion regarding the difference between an ecological label and a quality label,
1. pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije, ki želi sprožiti razpravo o pristopu Skupnosti k sistemu okoljskega označevanja za ribiške proizvode;
Welcomes the communication from the Commission launching a debate on a Community approach towards eco-labelling schemes for fisheries products;
4. meni, da obseg sedanjih sistemov dodatno prispeva h kompleksnosti tega vprašanja in da ne sme biti noben predlog v prihodnje oblikovan tako, da sistemi, ki so že prisotni na trgu, dobijo tržno prednost;
Believes that the range of schemes currently in place adds to the complexity of the issue and that any future proposal must not be designed in such a way that those already operating in the market are given a commercial advantage;
8. meni, da je znak lahko učinkovit le, če je enoten in potrošniku lahko razumljiv, tako da mu omogoča izbiro proizvodov, ki ohranjajo trajnost ribolovnih virov;
Believes that a label will be fully effective only if it is uniform and easily comprehensible to consumers, allowing them to choose products that maintain the sustainability of fisheries resources;
14. poziva Komisijo, naj v šestih mesecih izdela sporočilo Svetu in Parlamentu o minimalnih zahtevah in smernicah, ki jih mora izpolnjevati sistem okoljskega označevanja Skupnosti za ribiške proizvode;
Urges the Commission to draw up a communication to the Council and to Parliament within six months, subject to developments in the broad debate, detailing the minimum requirements and guidelines with which a Community eco-labelling scheme for fisheries products must comply;
Komisijo tudi poziva, naj pri oblikovanju osnov sistema okoljskega označevanja za ribiške proizvode v Evropski uniji upošteva ustrezna mednarodna merila, zlasti tista, ki jih je določila Organizacija ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo, tako da bo sistem med drugim:
Urges the Commission, further, to take into account international criteria relating to this matter, in particular the criteria set out by the FAO, when it comes to laying the foundations of an eco-labelling scheme for fisheries products in the EU, so that the scheme, amongst other things;
(a) skladen tako s kodeksom ravnanja Organizacije ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo kot tudi z resolucijami drugih mednarodnih organizacij, kot sta OZN in STO;
(a) is consistent with both the FAO Code of Conduct and the resolutions adopted by other international organisations, including the UN and WTO;
(b) prostovoljen in bo zagotavljal večjo zaščito okolja, česar pa si ne bi smeli razlagali s tem, da je izdelek brez okoljske oznake slabše kakovosti;
(b) is voluntary and guarantees greater protection of the environment without any suggestion that non-labelled products are of an inferior quality;
(c) pregleden na vseh stopnjah, tudi glede organske strukture in finančnih določb;
(c) is transparent in every way, including its organic structure and financial provisions;
(d) nediskriminacijski in ne bo oviral trgovine, zlasti v državah v razvoju, ter bo istočasno zagotavljal pošteno konkurenco,
(d) is non-discriminatory and does not pose obstacles to trade, particularly as regards developing countries, whilst at the same time guaranteeing fair competition;
(e) osnovala Komisija, ki bi morala uvesti pravila njegovega delovanja in zagotoviti neodvisnost organov, specializiranih za akreditacijo in certificiranje, ki sta bistveni orodji za zagotavljanje postopka ter verodostojnost navedb na oznaki;
(e) is promoted by the Commission, which would be responsible for establishing rules governing its operation and guaranteeing the independence of specialist accreditation and certification bodies, key components in the procedure, as well as the credibility of the claims made by the label;
(f) vseboval trajnostna merila, ki bodo izpolnjevala višje zahteve kot merila, ki veljajo za sistem upravljanja z viri Skupnosti, in ki morajo temeljiti na resnih znanstvenih analizah; ta merila so lahko glede na različne ribiške proizvode splošna ali bolj specifična;
(f) incorporates sustainability criteria, based on serious scientific analysis, which must be set out with a greater level of stringency than the criteria governing the Community resources management system; the aforementioned criteria may be both general and specific depending on the various fisheries products;
(g) zagotavljal, da bodo oznake vsebovale resnične podatke, kar pomeni, da je treba zagotoviti stalni nadzor nad proizvodom od ribiškega plovila do končnega potrošnika, torej spremljanje certificiranja, ki bo dokazovalo, da označeni proizvod izpolnjuje predvidene zahteve;
(g) ensures that labels carry accurate information, which means guaranteeing the chain of custody for the product from fishing vessel to final consumer, i.e. it should be possible to track certification and check that the labelled product complies with the relevant specifications;
(h) vključeval zanesljive in neodvisne postopke revizije in preverjanja;
(h) incorporates independent and reliable auditing and verification procedures;
(i) zagotavljal nujno potrebno javnost sistema;
(i) receives the vital degree of publicity;
(j) izbral oznako, na kateri bo končni rezultat ocene proizvoda naveden na opazen in potrošniku razumljiv način;
(j) opts for a label that includes the final result of the product's assessment in a way that is visible and easily understood by consumers;
Količina okoljskih oznak in raznolikost z njimi povezanih interesov napovedujejo nesoglasja pri opredelitvi, kaj predstavlja ali pomeni trajnostna uporaba ribištva.
The number of eco-labels in existence and the different interests surrounding them will inevitably lead to disagreements about the definition of the sustainable use of fisheries.
Ta nevarnost je utemeljena, saj bodo različne oznake zaradi različnih meril, na katerih temeljijo, potrošnike zagotovo zmedle.
This represents a serious danger, since these different labels will undoubtedly cause confusion for consumers as a consequence of the different criteria on which they are based.
Zato se bo treba vsaj na ravni Skupnosti sporazumeti za splošna merila trajnosti, ki bodo določena s predpisi Skupnosti, izdelanimi v ta namen.
It will therefore be necessary, on a Community level at least, to agree on general criteria for sustainability, which should be laid down in the Community legislation established to that end.
Evropska unija mora nujno načeti to vprašanje, če želi zaustaviti razširjanje okoljskih oznak ter zagotoviti uvedbo enega ali več sistemov, ki bodo temeljili na enakih načelih in osnovnih zahtevah.
The EU must, as a matter of urgency, tackle this issue in order to curb the proliferation and spread of eco-labels and ensure that either one single or several different systems based on the same fundamental principles and requirements is/are established.
Zato je treba upoštevati predvsem naslednje vidike:
In order to achieve this, the following points, amongst others, must be taken into consideration:
Informacije so trenutno zelo razpršene in tudi v mednarodnih forumih si še niso na jasnem o tej temi.
At present, there is a huge dispersal of information and a lack of clarity on the issue, even in international fora.
Zato mora Evropska unija ob sodelovanju vseh vpletenih sektorjev resno razmisliti o tem, preden se bo dokončno odločila.
Therefore it is vital that the EU give serious thought to this matter, and that all parties concerned may participate in the process, before a final decision is made.
Da ne bi sprejela odločitev, ki bi lahko imele negativne posledice, je nujno natančno preučiti, kaj Unija potrebuje.
It is crucial that there be a clear understanding of what is best for the EU before making any decisions that may have negative consequences.
Treba si je zastaviti vprašanje, ali raznolikost okoljskih oznak prinaša ugodnosti.
One question to consider is whether the variety of eco-labels may in fact be a positive thing.
Čeprav verjetno zagotavlja večjo prožnost, je gotovo tudi res, da lahko v nasprotju z enotnim ali omejenim sistemom izniči glavno vrednost okoljskega označevanja, s tem pa ustvarja nezaupanje pri potrošniku.
However, even if this does allow for greater flexibility, it is also true that the essential value of eco-labelling may be lost, resulting in lack of confidence amongst consumers, in contrast to a single or restricted system.
Glede sledljivosti proizvodov vse do končnega potrošnika je treba zagotoviti, da so podatki na oznaki resnični in preverljivi.
As regards product traceability, each individual down to the end consumer must be able to be sure that what is written on the label is accurate and that all relevant information is accessible.
Zato mora biti mehanizem sledljivosti zelo dobro zasnovan.
For this to happen, we must ensure that the mechanism for traceability is designed properly.
Vprašati se je treba, ali si bomo postavili za cilj javni ali zasebni sistem okoljskega označevanja.
We have to consider whether we want to opt for a public or a private management system for eco-labelling.
Javni sistem načeloma ponuja večje jamstvo kot zasebni, je v manjši nevarnosti, da bi postal diskriminacijski, poleg tega pa njegova organizacija zagotavlja višjo raven pravne varnosti in neodvisnosti.
A public system is, to begin with, one which brings more guarantees than a private system, running less risk of being discriminatory, whilst its organisational structure carries with it a greater degree of legal certainty and ensures independence.
V primeru odločitve za zasebne sisteme bi morali ti temeljiti na minimalnih vsebinskih zahtevah, ki bi jih Evropska unija določila v skladu s smernicami Organizacije ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo ob uporabi že obstoječih smernic, zlasti tistih Mednarodne organizacije za standardizacijo (ISO).
As regards opting for private systems, these would have to be set out in accordance with substantial minimum requirements, fixed by the EU, as defined in the FAO guidelines and referring to existing directives, particularly those set out by the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO).
Nosilec sistema okoljskega označevanja mora uporabljati storitve ločenega in neodvisnega akreditacijskega organa, ki v njegovem imenu prevzame nalogo akreditacije certifikacijskih organov.
The promoter of the scheme should call on the services of a separate and independent accreditation specialist to carry out the task of accrediting certification bodies on its behalf.
V.- Trajnostna merila
V. Sustainability criteria
Ena najbolj zapletenih prvin razprave je določitev meril, ki bodo zagotavljala trajnost ribolovnih virov.
Internationally there is no consensus on which indicators should be used, nor whether there should be just one indicator.
Na mednarodni ravni ni soglasja o tem, kateri kazalniki (ali kazalnik) naj bi bili merodajni, zaželeno pa bi bilo, da Evropska unija določi jasna merila.
It would therefore be desirable for the EU to establish clear sets of criteria.
Treba se je vprašati, o kakšni vrsti meril govorimo.
The question to consider is what kind of criteria we are talking about.
Najprej je treba glede na vrsto ribištva razlikovati med splošnimi in specifičnimi merili.
Firstly, we would have to differentiate between general and specific criteria according to the type of fishery.
Pri prvih lahko razlikujemo med merili, ki temeljijo na znanstvenih analizah (pravni predpisi Skupnosti načeloma temeljijo na trajnostnem razvoju, tako da bi to merilo izpolnjevalo vse ribištvo), merili v zvezi z manjšim vplivom na okolje ali ekosistem (kar bi zahtevalo upoštevanje bolj selektivnih načinov proizvodnje) in nazadnje še merili za varno hrano (torej takšnih, ki ne bi bili zdravju škodljivi).
As regards general criteria, we can differentiate between criteria based on scientific analysis (in principle the Community rules are based on sustainable development and so all fisheries would comply with this particular criterion), criteria relating to limiting the impact on the environment and ecosystem (which would involve looking at more selective production methods) and finally criteria relating to food safety (i.e. that they do not represent a danger to health).
VI.- Razčlenitev sporočila Evropske komisije
Analysis of the communication from the European Commission
Glede na to, da gre za sporočilo, ki naj bi sprožilo razpravo o pristopu Skupnosti k zasnovi okoljskega označevanja ribiških proizvodov, poročevalka priznava, da je zelo razočarana nad borno razčlenitvijo in skopo vsebino.
As regards the communication which claims to be launching a debate on a Community approach towards eco-labelling schemes for fisheries products, the rapporteur stresses how very disappointed she was by its poor analysis and limited content.
To bi lahko kazalo na to, da se Komisija ne zanima dovolj za to vprašanje.
It is indicative of the lack of interest that the Commission appears to show in this matter.
V primeru Organizacije ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo niso upoštevane niti njene smernice za okoljsko označevanje, ki so bile vsebovane v mnogih delovnih dokumentih, še preden so bile sprejete.
In the case of the FAO, its guidelines on eco-labelling are not even included, guidelines which already featured in many working documents even before their approval.