natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(da) navedbi sklicevanja na pooblastila Parlamenta glede podelitve razrešnice v zvezi z izvrševanjem proračuna v Naslovu VII o financah Unije, ker je odobritev računovodskih izkazov s podelitvijo razrešnice s političnega vidika enaka odobritvi izdatkov s sprejetjem proračuna in ker so nedavni medinstitucionalni odnosi dokazali pomembnost postopka podelitve razrešnice,
(da) the inclusion in Title VII of part 1 on the Union's finances of a reference to Parliament's discharge powers in respect of the implementation of the budget, since the approval of the accounts via the discharge procedure is at the same level in political terms as the authorisation of expenditure via the approval of the budget and the recent history of interinstitutional relations has shown the vital importance of the discharge procedure,
(db) določenem številu članov Računskega sodišča in odpravi načela, da je vsaka država članica upravičena do imenovanja svojega člana Računskega sodišča,
(db) a set number of Members of the Court of Auditors and the abolition of the principle that each Member State shall be entitled to nominate its own Member of the Court,
Odstavek 4 - doda se nova točka (fa)
Paragraph 4 - add new point (fa)
MNENJE ODBORA ZA ZAPOSLOVANJE IN SOCIALNE ZADEVE
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, naj kot pristojni odbor v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. izraža zadovoljstvo, ker vrednote, načela in cilji Ustave predstavljajo trdno podlago za socialno Evropo, saj so na podlagi socialnega tržnega gospodarstva s polno zaposlenostjo med njimi predvsem spodbujanje socialne pravičnosti in zaščite, enakost možnosti med moškimi in ženskami ter boj proti socialni izključenosti, revščini in razlikovanju;
Expresses its satisfaction that the values, principles and objectives of the Constitution provide a solid basis underpinning a Social Europe by including in particular, on the basis of a social market economy with full employment, the promotion of social justice and protection, equality between women and men and the combating of social exclusion, poverty and discrimination;
8. pozdravlja uvajanje instrumenta "pobude evropskih državljanov", ki omogoča uvrstitev določene zadeve v program Komisije Evropske unije, če je za to zbrano milijon podpisov;
Welcomes the introduction of the instrument of the 'European Citizen's Initiative', under which an issue can be placed on the agenda of the Commission on submission of one million signatures;
12. izraža zadovoljstvo z razširitvijo, čeprav še vedno v omejenem obsegu, glasovanja s kvalificirano večino na področju socialne politike; predvsem glede storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena in socialne varnosti za delavce migrante ; obžaluje pravico držav članic, da zahtevajo obravnavo zadeve v Evropskem svetu;
Expresses its satisfaction with the extension, albeit limited, of qualified majority voting in the field of social policy, in relation in particular to services of general economic interest and social security for migrant workers; regrets the right of Member States to request that the matter be referred to the European Council;
Izid končnega glasovanja
Result of the final vote
Namestniki (člen 178 (2)), navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitutes under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je v osnutek Ustave vključilo poglavje o demokratičnem življenju Unije in načelo, da se odločitve morajo sprejemati na najbolj pregleden način na ravni, ki je kar se da blizu državljanom; poudarja pomen odgovornosti institucij Skupnosti do državljanov in potrebo državljanov ter njihovih organizacij, da imajo dostop do pravnega varstva, še posebej na področju okolja v skladu s konvencijo ZN-ECE iz Aarhusa.
Welcomes the incorporation into the draft Constitution of a chapter devoted to the democratic life of the Union and the principle that decisions must be taken in the most transparent manner possible and at a level as close as possible to citizens; emphasises the significance of the responsibility borne by the Community institutions vis-à-vis citizens and the need for citizens and their organisations to have access to justice, in particular in the area of the environment, in accordance with the UN ECE’s Aarhus Convention.
OMNENJE ODBORA ZA INDUSTRIJO, RAZISKAVE IN ENERGETIKO
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Vseevropska omrežja, industrija, vesolje in energija
TENs, Industry, Space and Energy
Pozdravlja jasnejše cilje in poenostavitev postopka na področjih vseevropskih omrežij (TEN) in industrije;
Welcomes the improvement brought about in terms of clarification of objectives and simplification of procedure concerning the fields of Trans-European Networks (TENs) and the industry;
4. kot vmesni ukrep in zaradi poteka pogodbe Euratom podpira ločitev pogodbe Euratom od Pogodbe o ustavi in ločitev pravne osebe skupnosti Euratom od nove pravne osebe Evropske unije;
Supports, as an interim measure and with a view to the expiry of the Euratom Treaty, the separation of the Euratom Treaty from the Constitutional Treaty and the separation of the Euratom Community's legal personality from the European Union's new legal personality;
Ponavlja svoje mnenje, da pogodba Euratom zaradi:
Reiterates its view that the Euratom Treaty:
a) svoje medvladne narave morda ne ustreza logiki Pogodbe o ustavi,
a) being intergovernmental in nature may not conform to the Constitutional Treaty's logic,
b) uvajanja svoje lastne skupne carinske tarife morda ni v skladu z izključno pristojnostjo EU na tem področju,
b) setting up its own common customs tariff may not be compatible with the Union's exclusive competence in this area,
c) izvrševanja svojih lastnih zunanjih odnosov ni v skladu z dejavnostmi EU na področju zunanjih zadev,
c) implementing its own external relations is not consistent with the Union's external action,
d) ohranjanja svojih lastnih institucionalnih določil ter ločenih ukrepov in politik na področju raziskav in sodelovanja morda ni v skladu z logiko Pogodbe o ustavi,
d) retaining its own institutional provisions and separate actions and policies over research , investment and co-operation may not be compatible with the logic of the Constitutional Treaty,
e) pogajanj in sklepanja svojih lastnih mednarodnih sporazumov morda ni v skladu s postopkom za mednarodne sporazume (člen III-325);
e) negotiating and concluding its own international agreements may not be consistent with the procedure laid down for international agreements (Art.
Raziskave in tehnološki razvoj
Research and technological development
a) osnovne raziskave niso opredeljene kot prednostna naloga,
a) basic research is not included as a priority,
b) protokol o Evropski skupnosti za premog in jeklo (ESPJ), priložen Pogodbi iz Nice, ni povezal novoustanovljenega 'raziskovalnega sklada za premog in jeklo' z okvirnim programom v zakonodajnem postopku (t.j. soodločanje in glasovanje s kvalificirano večino),
b) the Protocol on the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) annexed to the Treaty of Nice has not linked the newly created 'Research Fund for Coal and Steel' to the framework programme under the legislative procedure (i.e. co-decision and qualified majority voting),
c) čeprav za okvirni program velja postopek soodločanja, za specifične programe ta ne velja;
c) although the framework programme falls under co-decision, the specific programmes do not;
MNENJE ODBORA ZA REGIONALNI RAZVOJ
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
o Pogodbi o ustavi za Evropo
on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
Pripravljavec mnenja:
Rapporteur pour avis:
Odbor za regionalni razvoj poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
– ob upoštevanju ozemeljske ureditve vsake izmed držav članic, ki je določena v njihovih ustavah,
- having regard to the territorial organisation of each Member State provided for in their respective constitutions,
A. ker Preambula Listine o temeljnih pravicah, vključena pod naslov II osnutka Ustave priznava "nacionalno identiteto držav članic in organizacijo njihovih javnih organov na državni, regionalni in lokalni ravni",
A. whereas the Preamble to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, incorporated in Title II of the draft Constitution, recognises the "national identities of the Member States and the organisation of their public authorities at national, regional and local levels",
B. ker Evropska unija temelji na dvojni legitimnosti držav in državljanov, kot je določeno v členu I-1 osnutka Ustave,
B. whereas the European Union is based on the dual legitimacy of the State and of the citizen as established in Article I-1 of the draft Constitution,
C. ob sklicevanju na vlogo regionalnih in lokalnih organov pri izgradnji Evrope; ker člen I-5 osnutka Ustave izrecno omenja lokalno in regionalno samoupravo kot neločljiva dela nacionalne identitete držav članic,
C. recalling the role of the regional and local authorities in the European project; whereas Article 1-5 of the draft Constitution explicitly refers to regional and local self-government as an integral part of the identity of the Member States,
D. ker ima Odbor regij skupaj z Evropskim parlamentom pomembno vlogo pri vključevanju lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti v delovanje Unije,
D. whereas the Committee of the Regions is called upon to play a significant role, together with the European Parliament, in involving local and regional governments in the work of the Union,
E. ker je načelo subsidiarnosti eden izmed temeljev izgradnje Evrope in ker je bilo v osnutku Ustave ustrezno okrepljeno,
E. whereas the principle of subsidiarity is one of the cornerstones of the European project, whereas it has been appropriately reinforced under the Draft Constitution,
1. z veseljem ugotavlja, da osnutek Ustave priznava in zagotavlja nacionalno identiteto držav članic v skladu z mednarodnim pravom;
Is gratified to see that the draft Constitution recognises and guarantees the national identity of the Member States, in accordance with international law;
6. pozdravlja, da osnutek Ustave priznava in spoštuje dostop do storitev splošnega gospodarskega interesa z namenom spodbujanja socialne in teritorialne kohezije Unije;
Welcomes the fact that the draft Constitution recognises and respects access to services of general economic interest in order to promote the social and territorial cohesion of the Union;
8. z veseljem ugotavlja, da osnutek Ustave jasno omenja med bistvenimi cilji kohezijske politike regije z omejenimi možnostmi (otoki, gorske regije, mejne regije in območja z nizko naseljenostjo prebivalstva);
Is gratified to see that the draft Constitution makes explicit mention of less-favoured regions (islands, mountain regions, border regions and areas with low population density) in relation to the vital objectives of cohesion policy;
MNENJE ODBORA ZA KMETIJSTVO
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture
Evropski parlament se je moral dolgo boriti, da je bilo v postopek soodločanja vključeno tudi področje kmetijske politike.
The European Parliament has had to battle long and hard for codecision in the area of agriculture.
Od začetkov skupne kmetijske politike pred skoraj pol stoletja sta bila Evropski parlament in njegov odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja udeležena le kot posvetovalni organ.
Since the launch of the common agricultural policy almost half a century ago, the European Parliament and its Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development have played only an advisory role.
Še danes se lahko Svet kmetijskih ministrov odloči, da ne bo upošteval mnenja Evropskega parlamenta in tako samostojno brez vsakršnega demokratičnega nadzora razpolaga z več kot polovico proračuna EU.
Even today the Council of Agriculture Ministers may choose to ignore the opinion of the European Parliament and take charge of just under half of the Union's budget without any democratic scrutiny.
To pomanjkanje demokratičnosti je v preteklih desetletjih preprečilo sprejetje potrebnih reform in povzročilo velike krize pri zdravstvu prebivalstva ter na področju okolja in zaščite živali.
This democratic deficit has made necessary reforms impossible for decades and provoked major crises in public health, the environment and animal welfare.
Afera BSE bi ne dosegla svojega katastrofalnega obsega, če bi bil takrat EP udeležen pri soodločanju o ukrepih za preprečevanje in odpravljanje škode.
The BSE crisis would not have reached such catastrophic proportions if Parliament had been involved in the decisions on precautionary and control measures.
Evropski parlament in še posebej odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja se nista nikoli sprijaznila s tem pomanjkanjem demokratičnosti.
The European Parliament, and particularly the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, has never been able to accept this democratic deficit.
Neuradno je EP z zadrževanjem priprave svojih mnenj in pogajanj s Komisijo Svet pogosto prisilil k neke vrste soodločanju.
Unofficially, it has often imposed a form of codecision with the Council by withholding its opinions and suspending dealings with the Commission.
Zato je treba pozdraviti dejstvo, da v postopek soodločanja od Amsterdamske pogodbe naprej spadajo vsaj varstvo okolja, varna hrana in varstvo potrošnikov.
It is to be welcomed that, since the Amsterdam Treaty, the codecision procedure has at least been applied in the areas of environment, food safety and consumer protection.
Vendarle pa edina evropska institucija, ki ji demokratično legitimnost zagotavljajo neposredne volitve, še vedno ne nadzira skupne kmetijske politike z njenimi mogočnimi instrumenti za trgov ureditev ter spodbujanje rasti investicij in dohodkov.
However, the common agricultural policy with its powerful instruments of the common organisation of the markets and investment and income subsidies is still not under the supervision of the only European institution to be directly elected and therefore democratically legitimate.
Končno ima pri vseh temeljnih odločitvah v zvezi s kmetijsko politiko besedo tudi EP.
From now on, all basic decisions on agricultural policy will be subject to codecision by the European Parliament.
Na določenih področjih, še posebej pri določanju kvot, cen in količinskih omejitev, pa osnutek ustave v primerjavi s sedanjim stanjem pomeni korak nazaj; o teh vprašanjih naj bi Svet namreč odločal sam, brez udeležbe Evropskega parlamenta.
However, in certain areas, in particular the setting of quotas, prices and quantitative restrictions, the draft Constitution proposes a worsening of the current situation: the Council is to decide on these matters without the involvement of the European Parliament.
Tako je načeloma kompromis, dosežen na medvladni konferenci v Bruslju, korak v pravo smer, vendar še vedno ne predvideva splošnega soodločanja.
The compromise reached at the Intergovernmental Conference in Brussels is clearly a step in the right direction but does not provide for full codecision.
Največja slabost kompromisa iz Bruslja je, da so cilji skupne kmetijske politike, ki so bili določeni že pred pol stoletja, v členu III-123 tretjega dela osnutka ustave navedeni v popolnoma nespremenjeni obliki.
A significant shortcoming in the compromise reached in Brussels is that the objectives of the common agricultural policy decided upon half a century ago have been incorporated under Part III, Article III-123 of the draft Treaty completely unchanged.
Ti cilji dandanes ne ustrezajo več medtem že večkrat spremenjeni kmetijski politiki in tudi ne prinašajo novega zagona za nujno potrebno usmerjeno podporo kmetijstvu in integracijo okoljske politike in zaščite živali.
Today they are no longer compatible with the since much-reformed agricultural policy and provide no new impetus for the urgently needed support for the rural economy and the inclusion of environmental policy and animal welfare.
Prav tako ni smiselna ločena obravnava skupne kmetijske politike, razvoja podeželja in odnosov z državami v razvoju in drugimi trgovinskimi partnerji.
Nor is there any sense in dealing with agricultural policy separately from rural development and relations with developing countries and other trade partners.
Ravno nasprotno, EP mora v bližajočem se procesu ratifikacije storiti vse, da bi državljanom približali doseženi napredek, s katerim se bodo po sprejetju ustave srečevali tudi v praksi.
Parliament should do all it can during the forthcoming ratification process to make citizens aware of the advances the adoption of the Constitution will mean for them specifically.
Skupna kmetijska politika je bila in je eden od temeljev evropske integracije, kar bo ostala tudi v prihodnje, če bo navzven spodbujala poštene mednarodne trgovinske odnose na področju živil in surovin, navznoter pa se spoprijela z novimi izzivi na področju razvoja podeželja in okolju prijaznega, gospodarsko in družbeno trajnostnega kmetijstva.
The common agricultural policy was and is a cornerstone of European integration and will remain so as long as it advocates fair international trade relations with regard to food and raw materials abroad and takes up the new challenges of rural development and environmentally, economically and socially sustainable agriculture at home.
To med drugim vključuje tudi, da bodo naša sredstva izrabljena na okolju prijazen način, da bodo naše kmetije ostale sposobne gospodarskega preživetja, da bodo kmetijski izdelki potrošnikom na voljo po ustreznih cenah in da bo kmetijska politika sprejemljiva tako za kmete kot tudi za celotno družbo.
This means making sure in particular that our resources are used in an environmentally friendly way, our farms remain economically viable, agricultural products are available to consumers at a reasonable price and that agricultural policy is acceptable both to farmers and to the whole of society.
Odbor za kmetijstvo poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Agriculture calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Izpostavlja dejstvo, da cilji skupne kmetijske politike, navedeni v členu III-227, niso združljivi s cilji Evropske unije, kot so definirani v členu I-3;meni, da se mora skupna kmetijska politika ažurirati, z namenom upoštevanja najnovejšega razvoja v tej politiki ter predvsem njene večfunkcionalne vloge do kmetov samih ter na področjih kmetijskega razvoja, okolja ter potrošnikov.
Points out that the objectives of the common agricultural policy set out in Article III-227 are incompatible with the European Union's objectives as defined under Article I-3; considers it to be essential, therefore, for the objectives of the CAP to be brought up to date in order to take into account the latest developments in this policy and, in particular, its multifunctional role with regard to farmers themselves, rural development, the environment and consumers;
Cilji skupne kmetijske politike so:
The objectives of the common agricultural policy shall be:
(a) v Evropski uniji podpirati večfunkcionalno, okolju in pokrajini primerno kmetijstvo, ki spodbuja biotsko raznovrstnost;
(a) to support a multifunctional agriculture in the European Union compatible with the environment and landscape that promotes biological diversity;
(b) povečati kmetijsko produktivnost s pomočjo spodbujanja in odgovorne izrabe tehničnega napredka, racionalnega razvoja kmetijskega pridelovanja in optimalne izrabe proizvodnih dejavnikov, še posebej delovne sile;
(b) to increase agricultural productivity through the promotion and responsible use of technical progress, the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum use of production factors, especially labour;
(c) kmetijski skupnosti in podeželskemu prebivalstvu zagotoviti primerljive življenjske pogoje in primerne dohodke, zlasti z nadaljevanjem politike razvoja podeželja in s povečanjem individualnega zaslužka oseb, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom;
(c) to guarantee the farming and rural population a comparable standard of living and income, in particular by continuing with the rural development policy and increasing the individual earnings of people employed in agriculture;
(d) zagotoviti stabilizacijo trgov;
(d) to stabilise markets;
(e) zagotoviti redno preskrbo;
(e) to assure the availability of supplies;
(f) zagotoviti, da je preskrba potrošnikom dostopna po pravičnih cenah;
(f) to ensure that supplies reach consumers at fair prices;
(g) spodbujati kakovost in varnost kmetijskih pridelkov in živil;
(g) to promote the quality and safety of agricultural products and food;
MNENJE ODBORA ZA RIBIŠTVO
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries
Pripravljavec mnenja: Ian Stewart Hudghton
Draftsman: Ian Stewart Hudghton
Odbor za ribištvo poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Fisheries calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. obžaluje tudi dejstvo, da nepriznavanje posebnih značilnosti ribištva dopušča regijam, ki niso odvisne od ribištva, nesorazmeren vpliv na zadeve s področja upravljanja ribištva;
Further regrets the fact that this failure to recognise the special characteristics of fisheries gives non-fisheries dependent regions and Member States a disproportionate influence in fisheries management matters;
6. meni, da je v zvezi z drugimi izključnimi pristojnostmi EU, določenimi v osnutku Ustave, vključitev ohranjanja bioloških morskih virov nenavadna in neupravičena;
Considers that, within the context of the other exclusive competences of the EU which are detailed in the draft Constitution, the inclusion of the conservation of marine biological resources is anomalous and unjustified;
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Uvodna izjava I, točka (d a) (novo)
Recital I, point (d a) (new)
(da) odstranitev nasprotij med cilji in načeli, zastavljenimi v delu I Ustave, in določbami iz dela III, ki ga je bilo treba zaradi delnega odvzetja mandata Konvenciji na Evropskem svetu v Solunu sprejeti v obliki osnutka predsedstva, čeprav je občutna večina članov Konvencije zahtevala mnogo bolj obsežne spremembe;
(da) the removal of contradictions between the goals and principles laid down in Part I of the Constitution and the provisions of Part III, which as a consequence of the partial withdrawal of the mandate of the Convention at the Thessaloniki European Council had to be adopted in the version of the Presidium draft, although a massive majority in the Convention had called for far-reaching changes
Odstavek 2, točka (e)
Paragraph 2, point (e)
Odstavek 3, točka (g)
Paragraph 3, point (g)