natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Obveznost izpolnjevanja predpisov iz mednarodnih konvencij o pomorski varnosti je že navedena v členu 3 Direktive 94/57/ES (prečiščeno besedilo), ki državam članicam nalaga izvajanje Resolucije IMO A.847(20) o smernicah za pomoč državam zastave.
The obligation to comply with the rules laid down in the international maritime safety conventions is already provided for in Article 3 of Directive 94/57/EC (consolidated text), which requires Member States to implement IMO resolution A 847(20) on Guidelines to assist flag States.
Namere Komisije
The Commission’s intentions
Predlog Komisije je kratkoročno usmerjen v odpravljanje domnevnih slabosti v pravilih IMO oziroma nezavezujoče narave ukrepov IMO, iz katere izhaja dejstvo, da na mednarodni ravni neizvajanje ni kaznivo, ter v ureditev diskrecijskih pravic pri razlagi odstopanj od pravil IMO, kar naj bi se preseglo z mehanizmi „komitologije“.
In the short term, the Commission wishes to remedy supposed weaknesses in the IMO rules, in other words the non-binding nature of IMO measures, and hence the fact that their non-enforcement is not punishable at international level, and the discretion accorded when interpreting exemptions from IMO rules: these shortcomings are apparently to be overcome by means of ‘comitology’ procedures.
Srednjeročni in dolgoročni cilj Komisije je preoblikovati floto držav članic v kakovostno floto ter izboljšati privlačnost njihovih zastav: možnost tretjih držav, ki zagotavljajo primerljiv sistem kakovosti, da lahko sklenejo sporazume z državami članicami EU, bi pripeljala do splošnega izboljšanja spoštovanja konvencijskih instrumentov.
In the medium and long term, the Commission is seeking to turn the Member States’ fleets into a high-quality fleet and make their flags more attractive: the possibility for third countries, if they could guarantee that they had comparable quality systems, to conclude agreements with EU Member States would raise the overall degree of compliance with the conventions.
Stališče držav članic
Position of the Member States
Nekatere države članice načeloma menijo, da Evropska skupnost nima pristojnosti za poseganje na to področje: mnoge med njimi se pritožujejo, češ da gre za kršenje načela subsidiarnosti (veljavnost nacionalnih sistemov) in merila sorazmernosti (preobilje predvidenih instrumentov).
Some Member States believe that, as a matter of principle, the Community is not competent to act; many of them, in any case, deplore what they see as a violation of the subsidiarity principle (effectiveness of national systems) and the proportionality criterion (plethora of instruments laid down).
Glede podrobnosti mnoge države članice predvidevajo, da bo spoštovanje standardov na področju zahtev države zastave ustvarilo dodatne neposredne (kvalificirani inšpektorji, izvajanje sistemov upravljanja, usposobljeno osebje za izvajanje revizij) in posredne stroške (prenos pristojnosti preverjanja in izdajanja spričeval na klasifikacijske zavode), ob tem pa tudi tveganje „podvajanja“ med praksami Skupnosti in mednarodnimi obveznostmi.
As regards the specifics, many Member States are predicting that compliance with the standards underlying flag State requirements will generate additional costs, whether direct (qualified surveyors, implementation of administrative systems, qualified auditing personnel) or indirect (delegation of survey-related and certification responsibilities to classification societies), posing a risk that Community practices might ‘overlap’ with international obligations.
Mnenje poročevalke
Opinion of the rapporteur
Teme za razpravo
Subjects for discussion
Ker nekatere države članice ne upoštevajo mednarodnih instrumentov, prihaja do težav: (a) na gospodarskem področju, saj se razhajanja med večjim nadzorom ladij zastave in pomanjkanjem natančnosti pri vpisu v registre odražajo na ladijskih stroških in na stroških uprav; (b) na socialnem področju, saj neizpolnjevanje mednarodnih obveznosti vpliva na zaposlovanje manj kvalificiranih in cenejših posadk ter tako povzroča socialni damping, ki kvalificiranemu osebju onemogoča dostop do delovnih mest; c) na področju varovanja okolja, saj uporaba ladij, ki niso skladne z merili iz mednarodnih konvencij in s katerimi upravljajo neustrezno usposobljene posadke, povečuje tveganje pomorskih nesreč, smrtnih žrtev ali poškodovanja okolja.
The failure of some Member States to comply with the international instruments creates problems (a) of an economic nature, given that the discrepancies between greater oversight of ships flying the flag and a lack of rigour at the time of registration make themselves felt in terms of the costs incidental to ships and the expenditure incurred by administrations; (b) in the social sphere, since failure to comply with international obligations has a bearing on the employment of cheaper, less skilled crews, leading to social dumping that does skilled personnel out of jobs; and (c) as regards environmental protection, since the use of ships not conforming to the international conventions, manned by crews without the necessary qualifications, increases the risk of marine incidents, losses of human lives, and damage to the ecosystem.
Problem pristojnosti
Competence problems
Domnevna omejenost zakonodajne pristojnosti EU se zdi pravno neutemeljena in politično neprimerna.
The putative limit to EU legislative competence seems legally unsound and politically unwise.
Po eni strani Pogodba ES glede pomorskega prometa ne predvideva zgolj abstraktne pristojnosti, temveč dopušča možnost pridržka pri izvrševanju zakonodajne pristojnosti (člen 80(2) PES).
On the one hand, as far as shipping is concerned, the EC Treaty itself not only assigns abstract competence, but also enables a preserve to be established through the exercise of legislative power (Article 80(2) TEC).
Po drugi strani pa se ne zdi smiselno v obdobju „globalnega prometa“ morja obravnavati kot nacionalno vprašanje in s tem preprečiti evropskemu zakonodajalcu, da uskladi prizadevanja za razvoj in izboljšanje pomorske varnosti.
Secondly, in the era of ‘global transport’, it makes little sense to treat the seas as a national matter, thus preventing the European legislature from coordinating efforts to develop and improve maritime safety.
Kot navedeno pa je EU že sprejemala zakonodajo na tem področju in se pri tem izrecno sklicevala na mednarodno ureditev.
Furthermore, as has been mentioned above, the EU has already legislated, explicitly invoking international rules.
Kar zadeva načelo subsidiarnosti in merilo sorazmernosti (člen 5(2) in (3) PES) se je mogoče strinjati, da: a) glede na številne nesreče v vodah Skupnosti (Erika, Prestige, Andinet, Estonia, Brear, Herald, Torey Canyon) pomorske zaščite na nacionalni ravni ni mogoče šteti za ustrezno in učinkovito; (b) ob upoštevanju, da kršitve konvencij IMO niso kaznive, je resnično izboljšanje izvajanja mogoče doseči z vključitvijo mednarodnih standardov v pravo Skupnosti.
As regards the subsidiarity principle and the proportionality criterion (Article 5 TEC, second and third paragraphs), it can no doubt be said that (a) given the repeated incidents in Community waters ( Erika , Prestige , Braer , Herald of Free Enterprise , Torrey Canyon ), protection at national level cannot be considered adequate or effective; (b) bearing in mind that infringements of the IMO conventions are not punishable, a real improvement in enforcement could be achieved by ‘Communitarising’ the international standards.
Namesto razprave o "če", bi bilo treba postaviti vprašanje "kako" ravnati, da bi z uravnoteženim pristopom in brez nepotrebnih birokratskih bremen uresničili prehod od delovanja na podlagi konvencij na delovanje Skupnosti.
The question should not be ‘if’, but ‘how’ to proceed, following an even-handed approach without cumbersome bureaucracy, in order to manage the change from action under the conventions to Community action.
Pretirana birokracija
Excessive red tape
Pojasniti je treba, da: a) niso države članice dolžne dokazovati, da spoštujejo pravila, temveč mora Komisija dokazati kršenje določb (zaupanje); b) države članice lahko izpolnjujejo obveznosti do Skupnosti z uporabo konvencijskih instrumentov za izvajanje mednarodnih pravil (revizija).
It needs to be made clear that (a) it is not the Member States which must prove that the standards are being applied, but the Commission which must prove that provisions are being violated (trust); and (b) Member States can fulfil Community obligations by employing the existing conventions to enforce international rules (auditing).
Predlog direktive namreč predvideva izenačenje nadzornih postopkov IMO in ES, kar naj bi poenostavilo prenos konvencij v pravni red Skupnosti.
Under the proposal for a directive IMO surveys and EC surveys are treated as equivalent procedures, thus apparently simplifying ‘Communitarisation’ of the conventions.
Po drugi strani pa se zdi, da določbe o „posredovanju informacij“ in „oceni uspešnosti“ povečujejo birokratsko breme nacionalnih uprav: nadzorne postopke in dokumentacijo je treba v največji možni meri poenotiti in poenostaviti.
On the other hand, the provisions for ‘communication of information’ and ‘performance evaluation’ seem likely to add to the bureaucratic burdens imposed on national administrations: monitoring procedures and documents need to be unified and simplified as far as possible.
Potreba po prožnosti
Need for flexibility
Glede učinkov „harmonizacije“ mehanizmov „komitologije“ velja poudariti, da je potrebna določena mera upravne diskrecije pri uveljavljanju obveznosti držav zastave, ki jo določbe IMO že predvidevajo, in sicer zaradi prilagajanja nacionalnim razmeram, ki se razlikujejo po „kakovosti“ in po „številčnosti“ flot: razlaga „na ravni Skupnosti“ bi se učinkoviteje uporabljala, če bi bil pogoj zanjo zahteva zainteresiranih strani (uprav in/ali izvajalcev) in bi bila podana za vsak primer posebej (namesto, da velja za vse).
As regards the effects of ‘harmonisation’ of the ‘comitology’ arrangements, the measure of administrative discretion already afforded by the IMO provisions is necessary in order to enable flag State requirements to be enforced in line with national situations, which differ in terms of the ‘quality’ and ‘quantity’ of fleets: the ‘Community interpretation would be employed to more useful effect if it were subject to a request from the parties concerned (administrations and/or operators) and given on a case-by-case basis (instead of being valid across the board).
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da pristojni odbor (COSS) v celoti sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic in mu Komisija le predseduje.
It should, however, be pointed out that the committee responsible (COSS) is staffed entirely by representatives of the Member States and merely chaired by the Commission.
Ocena stroškov
Estimated costs
Po navedbah študije o presoji učinkov, ki jo je pripravila Komisija, bo okrepitev nadzornih dejavnosti držav zastave pospešila ekonomije obsega pri postopkih države pristanišča: to bo predstavljalo prednost za ladje, ki so vpisane v registru iz Skupnosti, saj bo zanje več preverjanj „na vrhu“ (v fazi vpisa v register), manj pa inšpekcij „na dnu“ (v fazi pristanka).
According to the Commission’s impact assessment, more intensive oversight by flag States will promote economies of scale as far as port State procedures are concerned: this will work wholly to the advantage of ships in a Community register, which will undergo more ‘upstream’ checks (at the time of registration) but fewer ‘downstream’ inspections (when they berth).
Podobno bo izboljšano delovanje uprav – te bodo prisiljene izpolnjevati merila ISO, ki jih že sicer predvidevata konvenciji o varstvu človeškega življenja na morju (SOLAS) in o preprečevanju onesnaževanja morja z ladij (MARPOL) – sprva prineslo povišanje stroškov, vendar tudi povečanje učinkovitosti v prihodnosti.
Similarly, the upgrading of the administrations, which will have to meet ISO standards, and, moreover, are already required to do so under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), will increase expenditure temporarily, but enhance efficiency in the future.
Odbori, ki niso podali mnenja
Not delivering opinions
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktive Sveta 89/391/EGS, njenih posebnih direktiv in direktiv Sveta 83/477/EGS, 91/383/EGS, 92/29/EGS in 94/33/ES za poenostavitev in racionalizacijo poročil v zvezi s praktičnim izvajanjem
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/391/EEC, its individual Directives and Council Directives 83/447/EEC, 91/383/EEC, 92/29/EEC and 94/33/EC with a view to simplifying and rationalising the reports on practical implementation
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 89/391/EGS, njenih posebnih direktiv in direktiv Sveta 83/477/EGS, 91/383/EGS, 92/29/EGS in 94/33/ES za poenostavitev in racionalizacijo poročil v zvezi s praktičnim izvajanjem
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/391/EEC, its individual Directives and Council Directives 83/447/EEC, 91/383/EEC, 92/29/EEC and 94/33/EC with a view to simplifying and rationalising the reports on practical implementation
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0390 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0390 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 137(2) pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0242/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 137(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0242/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6‑0059/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0059/2006 ),
2. poziva Komisijo, naj zadevo ponovno predloži Parlamentu, če namerava svoj predlog bistveno spremeniti ali nadomestiti z drugim besedilom;
Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije, ki ga je predložila po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom za varnost in zdravje pri delu,
Having regard to the Commission's proposal, presented after consultation of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije,
Having regard to the Commission's proposal,
Sporazumni predlog spremembe, da se sporazum s Svetom doseže že v prvi obravnavi.
This is a compromise amendment with the Council in order to reach an agreement in first reading.
NAVEDBA SKLICEVANJA 3
CITATION 3
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora po posvetovanju z Odborom regij,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee, after consultation of the Committee of the Regions,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,
(8) Zdi se primerno, da se časovni presledek med poročili in kako pogosto jih države članice pošljejo Komisiji določi na pet let: struktura teh poročil mora biti usklajena, da se omogoči njihova uporaba; ta poročila bodo pripravljena na podlagi vprašalnika, ki ga določi Komisija po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom za varnost in zdravje na delovnem mestu.
(8) The appropriate frequency for the Member States to draw up these reports and submit them to the Commission would be five years; the structure of the reports must be consistent to facilitate their exploitation; they must be drawn up on the basis of a questionnaire drafted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work.
(8) Zdi se primerno, da se časovni presledek med poročili in kako pogosto jih države članice pošljejo Komisiji določi na pet let: prvo poročilo bi izjemoma zajemalo daljše obdobje; struktura teh poročil mora biti usklajena, da se omogoči njihova uporaba; ta poročila bodo pripravljena na podlagi vprašalnika, ki ga določi Komisija po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom za varnost in zdravje na delovnem mestu, vključevala pa bodo pomembne informacije o preventivnih ukrepih v državah članicah, da bo lahko Komisija, ob upoštevanju pomembnih ugotovitev Evropske agencije za varnost in zdravje pri delu ter Evropske fundacije za zboljšanje življenjskih in delovnih razmer, primerno ocenila delovanje zakonodaje v praksi.
(8) The appropriate frequency for the Member States to draw up these reports and submit them to the Commission would be five years; the first report should exceptionally cover a longer period; the structure of the reports must be consistent to facilitate their exploitation; they must be drawn up on the basis of a questionnaire drafted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work , and include relevant information on the preventive efforts deployed in the Member States so as to allow the Commission, taking into account any relevant findings of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work and of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, adequately to assess how the legislation works in practice .
(12) Potrebni ukrepi, ki jih morajo sprejeti države članice , ne vključujejo sprejetja zakonodajnih, regulativnih ali upravnih aktov, ker za pripravo poročil o izvajanju direktiv Skupnosti ni treba sprejeti takšnih določb na ravni držav članic –
(12) The necessary measures to be taken by the Member States do not involve the adoption of legislative, regulatory or administrative acts, since the drafting of reports on the implementation of Community directives does not currently require the adoption of such provisions at Member State level .
(12) Države članice bi morale sprejeti potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi bi prenesle spremembe, določene s to direktivo, ki bi glede na specifičen značaj te direktive po potrebi lahko imeli obliko upravnih ukrepov.
(12) The Member States should take the necessary measures to transpose the modifications provided for by this Directive, which could, in view of the specific nature of this Directive and if appropriate, take the form of administrative measures .
ČLEN 1 Člen 17 a, odstavek 1 (Direktiva 89/391/EGS)
ARTICLE 1 Article 17 a, paragraph 1 (Directive 89/391/EEC)
Države članice Komisiji vsakih pet predložijo enotno poročilo o praktičnem izvajanju te direktive in posebnih direktiv v smislu člena 16(1) ter navedejo stališča socialnih partnerjev.
Every five years, the Member States shall submit a single report to the Commission on the practical implementation of this Directive and individual Directives within the meaning of Article 16(1) thereof, indicating the points of view of the social partners.
V poročilu se ocenijo razne točke v zvezi s praktičnim izvajanjem posameznih direktiv in navedejo podatki, razdeljeni po spolu, kadar je to primerno in če so na voljo.
The report shall assess the various points related to practical implementation of the different Directives and, where appropriate and available, provide data disaggregated by gender.
ČLEN 1 Člen 17 a, odstavek 2 (Direktiva 89/391/EGS)
ARTICLE 1 Article 17 a, paragraph 2 (Directive 89/391/EEC)
Komisija določi strukturo poročila v sodelovanju s Svetovalnim odborom za varnost in zdravje pri delu.
The structure of the report shall be defined by the Commission, in cooperation with the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work.
Komisija določi strukturo poročila skupaj z vprašalnikom, ki podrobno določa njegovo vsebino, v sodelovanju s Svetovalnim odborom za varnost in zdravje pri delu.
The structure of the report , together with a questionnaire specifying its content, shall be defined by the Commission, in cooperation with the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work.
Poročilo vključuje splošni del, ki obsega določbe te direktive , in posebna poglavja, ki obsegajo vidike v zvezi z izvajanjem direktiv iz odstavka 1.
It shall include a general part on the provisions of this Directive and specific chapters on the implementation of the Directives referred to in paragraph 1.
Poročilo vključuje splošni del, ki obsega določbe te direktive , povezane s skupnimi načeli in točkami, ki veljajo za vse direktive iz odstavka 1.
The report shall include a general part on the provisions of this Directive relating to the common principles and points applicable to all of the Directives referred to in paragraph 1.
Posebna poglavja kot dodatek k splošnemu delu obravnavajo izvajanje posebnih vidikov vsake direktive, vključno s posebnimi kazalci, kadar so ti na voljo.
To complement the general part, specific chapters shall deal with implementation of the particular aspects of each Directive, including specific indicators, where available.
ČLEN 1 Člen 17 a, odstavek 3 (Direktiva 89/391/EGS)
ARTICLE 1 Article 17 a, paragraph 3 (Directive 89/391/EEC)
Komisija pošlje strukturo poročila skupaj z vprašalnikom v zvezi z njegovo vsebino državam članicam šest mesecev pred koncem obdobja, ki ga zajema poročilo.
The Commission shall send the structure of the report, together with a questionnaire specifying its content , to the Member States six months before the end of the period covered by the report.
Poročilo se pisno predloži Komisiji v devetih mesecih po koncu petletnega obdobja, ki je zajeto v poročilu.
The report shall be transmitted to the Commission within nine months of the end of the five-year period that it covers.
Komisija strukturo poročila skupaj z omenjenim vprašalnikom predloži državam članicam vsaj šest mesecev pred koncem obdobja, ki ga zajema poročilo.
The Commission shall submit the structure of the report, together with the above-mentioned questionnaire, to the Member States at least six months before the end of the period covered by the report.
Poročilo se pisno predloži Komisiji v dvanajstih mesecih po koncu petletnega obdobja, ki je zajeto v poročilu.
The report shall be transmitted to the Commission within twelve months of the end of the five-year period that it covers.
ČLEN 1 Člen 17 a, odstavek 4 (Direktiva 89/391/EGS)
ARTICLE 1 Article 17a, paragraph 4 (Directive 89/391/EEC)
Komisija na podlagi teh poročil izvede skupno oceno izvajanja zadevnih direktiv in doseženega napredka , zlasti glede raziskav in novih znanstvenih spoznanj na različnih področjih.
Using these reports as a basis, the Commission shall evaluate the implementation of the Directives concerned and developments in terms of research and new scientific knowledge in the various fields in question.
Komisija redno obvešča Evropski parlament, Svet, Ekonomsko-socialni odbor in Svetovalni odbor za varnost in zdravje na delovnem mestu o rezultatih te ocene in po potrebi o vsaki pobudi za boljše delovanje pravnega okvira.
It shall periodically inform the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work of this evaluation and, if necessary, of any initiatives to improve the operation of the regulatory framework.
Komisija na podlagi teh poročil izvede skupno oceno izvajanja zadevnih direktiv, zlasti glede njihove ustreznosti, raziskav in novih znanstvenih spoznanj na različnih področjih.
Using these reports as a basis, the Commission shall evaluate the implementation of the Directives concerned in terms of their relevance, research and new scientific knowledge in the various fields in question.
Komisija v 36 mesecih po koncu petletnega obdobja obvesti Evropski parlament, Svet, Ekonomsko-socialni odbor in Svetovalni odbor za varnost in zdravje na delovnem mestu o rezultatih te ocene in po potrebi o vsaki pobudi za boljše delovanje pravnega okvira.
It shall , within 36 months of the end of the five-year period, inform the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work of the results of this evaluation and, if necessary, of any initiatives to improve the operation of the regulatory framework.
ČLEN 3, UVODNI DEL
ARTICLE 3, INTRODUCTORY PART