natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poleg tega sem bil osem let član parlamentarnega odbora za proračun, v okviru katerega sem bil poročevalec in govornik v razpravi o državnem proračunu.
In addition, I was a member of the Congress's Committee on Budgets and was rapporteur and spokesman in the debate on the national budget during the eight years of my membership.
Kot svetovalec inštituta za davčne študije pri španskem ministrstvu za finance (1990–1995) sem sodeloval v skupini, ki je pripravila poročilo o ekonomskem in finančnem upravljanju javne porabe v Španiji (1993).
As an adviser to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (attached to the Spanish Finance Ministry - 1990-1995), I was a member of the team which drew up the 'Report on the economic and financial management of public expenditure in Spain' (1993).
Če ste že bili član Evropskega računskega sodišča, opišite, kako ste med opravljanjem svoje funkcije prispevali k izboljšanju upravljanja financ Evropske unije.
If you have already served as a Member of the European Court of Auditors, please describe the contribution that you have made to improving management of the European Union's finances during your time as Member of the European Court of Auditors.
Ker nisem bil nikdar član Evropskega računskega sodišča, na to vprašanje seveda ne morem odgovoriti.
I cannot really comment on this, as I have never before been a member of the European Court of Auditors.
To bi mogoče lahko storil, če bi me vprašali čez šest let, kar bi morda tudi pomenilo, da sem prispeval k boljšemu finančnemu poslovodenju v Evropski uniji.
I would only be able to answer properly if asked again in six years' time, by which time I would certainly hope to have contributed to improving the management of the Union's finances.
Čeprav sta tako Evropski parlament kot Računsko sodišče (Maastricht, 1992) evropski instituciji in kot taki uživata precejšnjo mero neodvisnosti, drži tudi to, da Računsko sodišče kot izvajalec zunanjega nadzora, ki je v interesu celotne Evropske unije, opravlja svoje naloge v povezavi s pristojnostmi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, dveh vej proračunskega organa Unije.
While both the European Parliament and the Court of Auditors (since Maastricht in 1992) are Institutions of the Union and as such enjoy a high degree of independence, it is also true that the Court, in its external control activities carried out in the general interest of the Union, exercises its control responsibilities in relation to the powers of the European Parliament and the Council, as the two branches of the Union's budgetary authority.
Če bi bilo mnenje Parlamenta negativno – upam sicer, da se to ne bo zgodilo – kandidature ne bi mogel umakniti, saj je nisem sam vložil, bi pa obvestil špansko vlado, da zaradi takšnega razpleta dogodkov ne morem sprejeti funkcije člana Računskega sodišča.
Should the circumstances you describe arise (as I certainly hope they will not), I would not be in a position to withdraw a candidacy which I did not submit myself, but I would inform the Spanish Government that, in view of the EP's unfavourable opinion, I felt unable to accept the position of member of the Court of Auditors.
Španska vlada, ki je v skladu s členom 247 (3) Pogodbe ES vložila mojo kandidaturo, bi morala Evropski uniji predlagati drugega kandidata.
The Spanish Government, having put forward my name as a candidate under Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty, would then have to submit a fresh proposal to the Union.
Predlaganje Juana Ramalla Massaneta za člana Računskega sodišča
Nomination of Juan Ramallo Massanet as a Member of the Court of Auditors
člen 247(3), prvi pododstavek, Pogodbe ES in člen 160b (3) Pogodbe Euratom
Articles 247(3), first subparagraph, EC and 160b (3) Euratom
o predlaganju Vitorja Manuela da Silve Caldeire za člana Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira as a Member of the Court of Auditors
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION.....................................................3
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS VITORJA MANUELA DA SILVE CALDEIRE
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF VÍTOR MANUEL DA SILVA CALDEIRA....................4
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI VITORJA MANUELA DA SILVE CALDEIRE NA VPRAŠALNIK
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF VÍTOR MANUEL DA SILVA CALDEIRA TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE 5
o predlaganju Vítorja Manuela da Silve Caldeire za člana Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira as a Member of the Court of Auditors
– ob upoštevanju člena 247(3) Pogodbe ES in člena 160 B(3) Pogodbe Euratom, v skladu s katerima se je posvetoval s Svetom ( C6‑0343/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty, and Article 160b (3) of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0343/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 101 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 101 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6‑0343/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0373/2005 ),
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS VITORJA MANUELA DA SILVE CALDEIRE
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF VÍTOR MANUEL DA SILVA CALDEIRA
Rojen v Campu Majorju (Portugalska) leta 1960.
Born in Campo Maior (Portugal) in 1960.
Poročen, ima dva otroka.
Married with two children.
Diplomiral iz prava (Univerza v Lizboni).
Graduate in Law (Lisbon University).
Podiplomski študij iz evropskih študij (Evropski inštitut, Pravna fakulteta, Univerza v Lizboni).
Postgraduate qualification in European Studies (European Institute, Faculty of Law, Lisbon University).
Predavatelj na Pravni fakulteti Univerze v Lizboni (1983–1984) in na Višjem inštitutu za nove poklice (1996–1999).
Lecturer in the Faculty of Law, Lisbon University (1983-1984) and the Higher Institute for New Professions (1996-1999).
1984–2000: zaposlen na Generalnem inšpektoratu za finance (IGF) kot inšpektor za finance/direktor (1989–1995) in generalni podinšpektor za finance (1995–2000).
1984-2000: employed at the Inspectorate-General for Finance (IGF), as Inspector of Finance/Director (1989-1995) and Sub-Inspector General of Finance (1995-2000).
Od leta 1995 odgovoren za področje Inšpektorata za usklajevanje inšpekcije Skupnosti in notranjega inšpekcijskega sistema za državno finančno upravo.
From 1995, responsible for the IGF's area of coordination of Community inspection and internal inspection system for the State Financial Administration.
Predsednik medministrskega odbora za uskladitev in inšpekcijo sistema financiranja EKUJS (jamstveni del) (1995–1999).
Chairman of the Interministerial Committee for Coordination and Inspection of the EAGGF (Guarantee) Financing System (1995-1999).
Predsednik finančnega sveta INDEPD – Indústrias e Participações de Defesa, S.A. (1994–1996); član Skupnega revizijskega odbora EUROPOL (2002–2004).
Chairman of the Fiscal Council of INDEPD – Indústrias e Participações de Defesa, S.A. (1994-1996); member of EUROPOL's Joint Audit Committee (2002-2004).
Svetovalec OECD za pobudo SIGMA ("Podpora za izboljšanje vodenja in upravljanja v državah srednje in vzhodne Evrope"), z misijami na finančnih ministrstvih Češke Republike (1997), Poljske (1998) in Estonije (1999).
Adviser to the OECD for the initíative known as SIGMA ('Support for Improvement in Governance and Managament in Central and Eastern European Countries'), with missions to the finance ministries of the Czech Republic (1997), Poland (1998) and Estonia (1999).
Član številnih delovnih skupin za zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti in boj proti goljufijam.
Member of a number of working groups on the protection of the Comunities' financial interests and the fight against fraud.
Član portugalske delegacije pri Svetovalnem koordinacijskem odboru za boj proti goljufijam (COCOLAF).
Member of the Portuguese delegation to the Advisory Coordination Committee for the Fight Against Fraud (COCOLAF).
Udeleženec pri delu Skupine osebnih predstavnikov finančnih ministrstev za dobro gospodarsko upravljanje (SEM 2000).
Participant in the work of the Group of Personal Representatives of the Finance Ministries for sound economic management (SEM 2000).
Član Evropskega računskega sodišča od marca 2000, z nalogo revizije bančnih aktivnosti EU, vključno Evropske centralne banke, Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo, Evropskih šol, decentraliziranih teles in Euratomove Agencije za oskrbo, vse do konca leta 2001.
Member of the European Court of Auditors since March 2000, with responsibility up to the end of 2001 for auditing the EU's banking activities, including the European Central Bank, the ECSC, the European Schools, the decentralised bodies and the Euratom Supply Agency.
Od januarja 2002 član Sodišča, odgovoren za izjavo o zanesljivosti (DAS), in poročevalec za mnenje Sodišča o enotnem sistemu revizije in o predlogu okvira notranje kontrole Skupnosti.
Since January 2002, Member of the Court responsible for its Statement of Assurance (DAS) and rapporteur for the Court's opinion on the single audit model and the proposal for a Community internal control framework.
Marca 2005 izvoljen za dekana skupine CEAD (usklajenost, presoja, zanesljivost, razvoj), ki je odgovorna za vodoravne revizijske aktivnosti.
In March 2005, elected Dean of the CEAD Group ( Coordination, Evaluation, Assurance, Development ), responsible for horizontal audit activities.
Tudi član upravnega odbora Sodišča.
Also member of the Court's Administrative Committee.
Govornik na različnih konferencah in seminarjih.
Invited speaker at various conferences and seminars.
Kaj menite o kritiki izjave o zanesljivosti (DAS), ki jo je Parlament izrazil v svojem poročilu o razrešnici 2003 in delovnih dokumentih za seminar o finančnem poslovodenju?
What do you think of Parliament's criticisms of the DAS as expressed in the 2003 discharge report and the working documents to the financial management seminar?
Prav tako sem imel priložnost, da predstavim svoje videnje te zadeve 4. oktobra 2005, na seminarju o finančnem poslovodenju, ki ga je organiziral Odbor za proračunski nadzor.
I also had the privilege of expressing my view on the matter on 4 October 2005 at the seminar on financial management organised by the same committee.
Menim, da poročilo o postopku razrešnice za leto 2003, ki ga je Sodišče strogo in natančno pregledalo, ustrezno poudarja ključno vprašanje, ki zadeva DAS, in sicer, ali obstoječi sistemi spremljanja in nadzora na ravni Skupnosti in na nacionalni ravni nudijo Komisiji zadostno jamstvo glede zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov.
I believe that the report on the discharge procedure for 2003, which was rigorously and closely examined by the Court, places the necessary emphasis on the key issue concerning the DAS, namely whether the monitoring and control systems existing at Community and national level offer the Commission reasonable guarantees as regards the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions.
DAS mora biti nepristranski, profesionalen ter uporaben za organ, ki podeljuje razrešnico, in za druge uporabnike.
The DAS has to be objective, professional, and usable by the discharge authority and other users.
Potreba po nepristranskosti pa pomeni, da lahko izraža le zaključke, do katerih je Sodišče prišlo ob reviziji dejanskega finančnega poslovodenja v tako velikem in zapletenem okolju, kot je Evropska unija.
Nonetheless, the need for objectivity means that it can only reflect the findings of the Court's auditing of the realities of financial management, in the huge and complex environment that is the European Union.
Sodišče mora skladno s členom 248(1) Pogodbe predložiti splošno izjavo DAS o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov, čemur je lahko dodana posebna ocena za posamična proračunska področja.
Under Article 248(1) of the Treaty, the Court is required to submit a global DAS on the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, which may be supplemented by specific assessments for individual budgetary areas.
Kot sem že povedal Odboru za proračunski nadzor, bi lahko skupno razumevanje izvrševanja tega člena Pogodbe pripomoglo k boljši določitvi delovnih ciljev.
As I have already said to the Committee on Budgetary Control, I believe that a common understanding on the implementation of that Treaty article could contribute to better identification of the objectives of the exercise.
Če želimo imeti zadostno jamstvo glede zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov, je treba oceniti učinkovitost sistemov nadzora in spremljanja glede na to, kako se nadzoruje tveganje nepravilnosti.
If there is to be a reasonable guarantee of the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, it is necessary to assess the efficiency of the monitoring and control systems in terms of how the risk of irregularity is managed.
Z drugimi besedami, nujno je določiti, kako učinkoviti so ti sistemi, ko gre za preprečevanje, odkrivanje in popravljanje stvarnih napak.
In other words, it is essential to determine how effective those systems are in preventing, detecting and correcting material errors.
Prepričan sem, da tak pristop zagotavlja pridobivanje popolnejših podatkov o delovanju sistemov spremljanja in nadzorovanja ter o tveganjih, ki so jim izpostavljeni, ter s tem uporabnikom izjave DAS ponudi še večjo dodano vrednost.
I am convinced that this approach ensures the provision of fuller information on the workings of the monitoring and control systems and the risks that affect them, thus providing increased added value for the users of the DAS.
To je predvsem iz dveh razlogov.
This is for two main reasons.
Prvič, pripomore k boljšemu razumevanju tveganj, ki jim je izpostavljeno upravljanje sredstev Unije.
First, it allows a better understanding of the risks which affect the management of Union funds.
Drugič, zagotavlja pridobivanje popolnejših podatkov o izvoru, naravi in finančnih učinkih težav, ki jih sistemi in nadzori ne odkrijejo in/ali popravijo, ter s tem omogoči ugotavljanje, kje so potrebne izboljšave.
Second, it provides fuller information on the origin, nature and financial impact of problems not detected and/or corrected by the systems and controls, so making it possible to identify where improvement is needed.
To so smernice, ki jih je Sodišče upoštevalo pri razvijanju svojega pristopa k izjavi DAS, kar je bilo pojasnjeno v že omenjenih dokumentih.
This has been the Court's line in developing its approach to the DAS, as has been made clear in the documents referred to.
Sodišče bo zagotovo dalje razvijalo svoj pristop ter ob tem upoštevalo spremembe na področju nadzora (predvsem tiste, ki nas čakajo v luči „načrta za okvir notranje kontrole Skupnosti“), razvoj mednarodnih revizijskih standardov ter seveda pripombe organa, ki podeljuje razrešnico, natančneje Evropskega parlamenta, kar zadeva oskrbovanje s še jasnejšimi podatki o doseženem napredku in o potrebnih izboljšavah, kot so na voljo zdaj.
The Court will certainly carry on developing this approach, taking due account of changes in the field of controls (especially those which await us in the wake of the 'road-map for a Community internal control framework'), the evolution of international auditing standards, and, of course, the comments of the discharge authority, and specifically the European Parliament, as regards the provision of even clearer information than at present on the progress achieved and the improvements needed.
Poročila sodišča morajo biti nepristranska, profesionalna in uporabna za tiste koristnike, ki so jim namenjena, ter za širšo evropsko javnost.
The Court's reports have to be objective, professional, and usable by their users and the European public in general.
Tako bi moralo delovati vsako neodvisno javno revizijsko telo v demokratični družbi.
These should be the characteristics of the work of any independent public audit body in a democratic society.
V tem smislu morajo poročila Sodišča na uravnotežen način odražati izsledke revizij, s primernim poudarkom na ugotovljenih močnih in šibkih točkah, na doseženem napredku in na potrebnih izboljšavah.
In this sense, the reports of the Court should reflect, in a balanced fashion, the findings of its audits, laying proper stress on strong and weak points identified, progress achieved and improvements needed.
Le tako lahko Sodišče na podlagi odgovornosti, ki mu jih podeljuje Pogodba, dobro opravlja svojo vlogo „finančnega varuha“ in prispeva k pozitivni podobi Unije v očeh evropske javnosti ter s tem poveča zaupanje javnosti v delo institucij.
Only in this way can the Court fully exercise its role of 'financial watchdog' and contribute to a positive image of the Union in the eyes of the European public, enhancing their trust in the workings of the institutions on the basis of the responsibilities conferred on it by the Treaty.
Seveda pa potreba po nepristranskosti poročila Sodišča pomeni, da sporočilo, ki ga nosi, ni vedno sprejeto z odobravanjem.
However, the need for the Court's reports to be objective means that its message is not always favourably received.
Sodišče se zavzema za to, da bi izboljšalo posredovanje izsledkov revizij.
The Court is concerned to improve the communication of the findings of its audits.
Njegovo delo mora biti razumljivo ne le strokovnjakom, temveč tudi vsakemu zainteresiranemu evropskemu državljanu.
Its work needs to be understood not just by specialists but by any interested European citizen.
To je cilj Sodišča.
This is the Court's objective.
To bo pomenilo razvijanje celotne politike za analizo potreb glavnih uporabnikov v povezavi z učinkovitimi komunikacijskimi metodami z namenom, da se določi področja, kjer so potrebne izboljšave, in da se določi nove načine komunikacije (npr. prek našega spletnega mesta).
It will mean developing a global policy for analysing the main users' needs in the contxt of effective communication methods, in order to identify areas for improvement and new means of communication (e.g. via our website).
Dobro finančno poslovodenje v kateri koli javni službi pomeni zagotavljanje pravilne in učinkovite porabe javnih virov, namenjenih njenemu delovanju.
Sound financial management in any public service means ensuring the correct and viable use of the public resources earmarked for its activities.
Temeljiti mora torej na upravljavskem modelu, ki bo zagotovil ustrezno, gospodarno, učinkovito in uspešno porabo teh virov.
It must therefore be based on a management model which will ensure the proper, economical, efficient and effective use of those resources.
V tem smislu, če ponudim nepopoln seznam, mora kultura dobrega finančnega poslovodenja v kateri koli javni službi imeti naslednje značilnosti:
In this sense and to give a non-exhaustive list, a sound financial management culture in any public service has to have the following features:
§ jasno začrtane cilje, ki omogočajo doseganje in načrtovanje nalog javne službe,
§ A clear definition of objectives permitting the realisation and planning of the public service mission;
§ nedvoumno opredelitev odgovornosti za doseganje ciljev in za upravljanje finančnih in človeških virov,
§ An unambiguous definition of responsibilities regarding achievement of the objectives and management of human and financial resources;
§ učinkovite notranje preglede,
§ Effective internal controls;
§ zanesljiv komunikacijski in informacijski sistem, ki vključuje splošne izkaze za razporejena sredstva ter ponuja natančne, zanesljive, popolne in najnovejše podatke za stalno spremljanje finančnih tokov in doseženih rezultatov,
§ A solid information and communication system including global accounts for the resources allocated and supplying exact, reliable, full and up-to-date information, the objective being the permanent monitoring of the financial flows and the results attained;
§ redna ocena opravljenega dela in morebitnih tveganj,
§ Regular assessment of the work done and the potential risks;
§ oddaja ustreznih in jasnih računovodskih izkazov, podprtih z neodvisnimi revizijami.
§ Submission of accounts in proper and transparent form, backed up by independent audits.
V skladu s členom 248 (4) Pogodbe Računsko sodišče pomaga proračunskemu organu pri nadzoru nad izvrševanjem proračuna.
Under Article 248(4) of the Treaty, the Court of Auditors assists the budgetary authority in exercising its control powers over the implementation of the budget.
V povezavi s tem so poročila Sodišča (letno poročilo, izjava o zanesljivosti, posebna poročila) predložena Evropskemu parlamentu in tam predmet razprave, predvsem Odbora za proračunski nadzor.
In this connection, the Court's reports (annual report, statement of assurance, special reports) are submitted to and debated by the European Parliament, in particular its Committee on Budgetary Control.
Prav tako je možno mnenja Sodišča predložiti Odboru v preučitev, kot se je zgodilo s poročilom o enotnem modelu revizije in o predlogu za okvir notranje kontrole Skupnosti (mnenje 2/2004).
The Court's opinions may also be submitted to and examined by that committee, as was the case with that on the single audit model and the proposal for a Community internal control framework. (opinion 2/2004).
Prav tako predsednik Sodišča odboru predloži letni načrt dela.
The annual working programme is submitted to the same committee by the President of the Court.
V povezavi s tesnejšim sodelovanjem med institucijama sta Odbor za proračunski nadzor in Računsko sodišče organizirala letna srečanja svojih članov za preučitev zadev skupnega interesa.
In the context of the increasingly close cooperation between the two institutions, the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Court of Auditors have organised annual meetings of their respective members to examine subjects of common interest.
Kot priča tega sodelovanja lahko zatrdim, da sem si ves čas službovanja in predvsem kot član Sodišča, odgovoren za DAS, prizadeval za spodbujanje konstruktivnega „dialoga“ s člani Odbora za proračunski nadzor, predvsem s poročevalci o razrešnici.
As personal evidence of this spirit of cooperation, I may state that I have endeavoured to promote, throughout my term of office and notably in my capacity as the member of the Court responsible for the DAS, a constructive 'dialogue' with the members of the Committee on Budgetary Control, especially with the discharge rapporteurs.
Pripombe Parlamenta na poročila Sodišča, predvsem na tista, ki se nanašajo na postopek o razrešnici, Sodišče natančno pregleda, in lahko sprožijo nove revizije in/ali ponovno določitev prednosti, ob upoštevanju večletnega načrta Sodišča in lastne analize tveganja.
Parliament's remarks on the Court's reports, notably those concerning the discharge procedure, are examined in detail by the Court, and may give rise to fresh audits and/or the redefinition of priorities, account being taken of the Court's multiannual programme and its own risk analysis.
V povezavi s tem člani Sodišča vse zahteve Parlamenta za posebne revizije pazljivo preučijo.
In this context, all requests by Parliament for specific audits receive careful consideration from the Court's members.
Finančna uredba je bila pred kratkim predmet temeljite reforme.
The Financial Regulation very recently underwent a root-and-branch reform.
Ne glede na to verjamem, da bo revizija, ki poteka, koristna, če je njen cilj nadaljnja poenostavitev finančnega poslovanja, ki temelji na jasnejši opredelitvi odgovornosti in na okrepitvi varovanja finančnih interesov Unije.
Despite this, I believe the review under way should prove useful insofar as its aim is the further simplification of financial management, backed up by a clearer definition of responsibilities and the reinforcement of the protection of the Union's financial interests.
Prav tako verjamem, da je glavni dejavnik, ki lahko prispeva k dodani vrednosti revizije, uvedba proračunskega načela učinkovitosti notranjega nadzora, v povezavi z minimalnimi pogoji za okvir notranje kontrole Skupnosti, ki jih je izpostavilo Sodišče v svojem mnenju 2/2004.
I also believe that the main element which can contribute to the review providing real added value is the establishment of the budgetary principle of the effectiveness of internal controls, in the context of the minimum conditions for a Community internal control framework put forward by the Court in its opinion 2/2004.