natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kako bi obravnavali primer večje nepravilnosti ali celo goljufije in/ali korupcije, v katerem bi bili udeleženi prebivalci vaše države članice?
How would you deal with a major irregularity or even fraud and/or corruption case involving actors in the Member State of your origin?
OPRAVLJANJE NALOG
PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES
Katere bi morale biti glavne značilnosti kulture dobrega finančnega poslovanja v javnih službah?
What should be the main features of a sound financial management culture in any public service?
Komisija je v svojem zadnjem poročilu o spremljanju napredka Romunije in Bolgarije opozorila na zamude uprav teh držav pri uvajanju primernih sistemov finančnega nadzora, vključno s predhodnim nadzorom ter neodvisno notranjo in zunanjo revizijo.
In its last Monitoring Report on Romania and Bulgaria, the Commission indicates delays in these countries’ administrations in setting up proper systems of financial control, including ex-ante control, independent internal and external audit.
Kateri ukrepi bi morali biti prednostni?
What measures should receive priority?
V skladu s Pogodbo Računsko sodišče pomaga Parlamentu pri nadzoru izvrševanja proračuna.
According to the Treaty the Court shall assist Parliament in exercising its powers of control over the implementation of the budget.
Kakšna menite, da je dodana vrednost revidiranja izvajanja nalog in kako naj se ugotovitve vključijo v upravljanje?
What do you think is the added value of performance audit and how should the findings be incorporated in the management?
Kako bi se lahko izboljšalo sodelovanje med Računskim sodiščem, nacionalnimi revizijskimi organi in Evropskim parlamentom (Odborom za proračunski nadzor) glede revizije proračuna EU?
How could the cooperation improve between the Court of Auditors, the National Audit Institutions and the European Parliament (Committee on Budgetary Control) concerning the audit of the EU budget?
DRUGA VPRAŠANJA
OTHER QUESTIONS
Ali bi umaknili svojo kandidaturo, če bi bilo mnenje Parlamenta o vašem imenovanju za članico Računskega sodišča negativno?
Would you withdraw your candidacy if Parliament’s opinion on your appointment as Member of the Court were unfavourable?
Predlaganje Nadežde SANDOLOVE za članico Računskega sodišča
Nomination of Nadezhda Sandolava as a Member of the Court of Auditors
o imenovanju Ovidiuja Ispira za člana Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Ovidiu Ispir as a Member of the Court of Auditors
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.............................................................5
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION................................................3
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS OVIDIUJA ISPIRA......................................................................6
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF OVIDIU ISPIR...........................................................4
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI OVIDIUJA ISPIRA NA VPRAŠALNIK.......................................10
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF OVIDIU ISPIR TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE...................................9
– ob upoštevanju člena 247(3) Pogodbe ES in člena 160(b)(3) Pogodbe Euratom, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0410/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty and Article 160b(3) of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0410/2006 ),
– ker je na seji dne 28. novembra 2006 Odbor za proračunski nadzor poslušal predstavitev kandidata Sveta za članstvo v Računskem sodišču in obravnaval strokovno usposobljenost glede na merila iz člena 247(2) Pogodbe ES in člena 160(b)(2) Pogodbe Euratom,
– whereas at its meeting of 28 November 2006 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council's nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors, and considered the nominee's qualifications in the light of the criteria laid down by Articles 247(2) of the EC Treaty and 160b(2) of the Euratom Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0443/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0443/2006 ),
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS OVIDIUJA ISPIRA
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF OVIDIU ISPIR
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI OVIDIUJA ISPIRA NA VPRAŠALNIK
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF OVIDIU ISPIR TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE
Naštejte tri najpomembnejše odločitve, pri katerih ste bili udeleženi v vaši poklicni karieri?
What are the three most important decisions to which you have been party in your professional life?
Pogodba določa, da so člani Računskega sodišča pri opravljanju svojih nalog "popolnoma neodvisni".
The Treaty stipulates that the Members of the Court of Auditors shall be "completely independent" in the performance of their duties.
Ali ste prejeli razrešnico za opravljanje svoje nekdanje funkcije, če je tak postopek v uporabi?
Have you received a discharge for the management duties you carried out previously, if such a procedure applies?
Ali imate poslovne ali finančne interese oziroma kakšne druge obveznosti, ki bi lahko bili v nasprotju z vašimi prihodnjimi nalogami?
Do you have any business or financial holdings or any other commitments, which might conflict, with your prospective duties?
Ali ste se po imenovanju za člana Računskega sodišča pripravljeni odreči izvoljenim funkcijam ali aktivni funkciji z obveznostmi v politični stranki?
Are you prepared to step down from any elected office or give up any active function with responsibilities in a political party after your appointment as Court Member?
Although the primary responsibility for the prevention, detection and investigation of irregularities and offences rests with those responsible for the management and execution of EU programmes [European Commission and Member States], the European Court of Auditors assesses how well these partners fulfill their responsibilities and to what extent they improve the systems implementing the financial management of transactions related to the EU budget.
Although the primary responsibility for the prevention, detection and investigation of irregularities and offences rests with those responsible for the management and execution of EU programmes [European Commission and Member States], the European Court of Auditors assesses how well these partners fulfil their responsibilities and to what extent they improve the systems implementing the financial management of transactions related to the EU budget.
Komisija je v svojem zadnjem poročilu o spremljanju napredka Romunije in Bolgarije opozorila na zamude uprav teh držav pri uvajanju primernih sistemov finančnega nadzora, vključno s predhodnim nadzorom, neodvisno notranjo in zunanjo revizijo.
In its last Monitoring Report on Romania and Bulgaria , the Commission indicated delays in these countries' administrations in setting up proper systems of financial control, including ex-ante control, independent internal and external audit.
Kaj menite, da je dodana vrednost revidiranja izvajanja nalog in kako naj bi se ugotovitve vključile v upravljanje?
What do you think is the added value of performance audit and how should the findings be incorporated in the management?
Kako bi se lahko izboljšalo sodelovanje med Računskim sodiščem, nacionalnimi revizijskimi organi in Evropskim parlamentom (Odborom za proračunski nadzor) v zvezi z revizijo proračuna EU?
How could the cooperation improve between the Court of Auditors, the National Audit Institutions and the European Parliament (Committee on Budgetary Control) concerning the audit of the EU budget?
Druga vprašanja
Other questions
Imenovanje Ovidiuja Ispira za člana Računskega sodišča
Nomination of Ovidiu Ispir as a Member of the Court of Auditors
Pripombe (na voljo samo v enem jeziku)
Comment (available in one language only)
o predlogu spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 6/2006 za proračunsko leto 2006
on Draft amending budget No 6/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006
o predlogu spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 6/2006 za proračunsko leto 2006, oddelek III – Komisija
on Draft amending budget No 6/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III – Commission
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zlasti predzadnjega pododstavka člena 272(4) te pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 272(4), penultimate subparagraph, thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo, zlasti člena 177 te pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 177 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 27. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti,
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 27 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
1. zlasti členov 37 in 38,
1. , and in particular Articles 37 and 38 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, ki je bil dokončno sprejet 15. decembra 2005,
– having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, as finally adopted on 15 December 2005
UL L 78, 15.3.2006.
OJ L 78, 15.3.2006. ,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 6/2006 za proračunsko leto 2006, ki ga je Komisija predložila 31. oktobra 2006 ( SEC(2006)1410 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 6/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, which the Commission presented on 31 October 2006 ( SEC(2006)1410 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe proračuna št. 6/2006, ki ga je Svet pripravil 30. novembra 2006 (15635/2006 – C6‑0441/2006 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 6/2006, which the Council established on 30 November 2006 (15635/2006 – C6‑0441/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 69 in priloge IV svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 69 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0444/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0444/2006 ),
A. ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 6/2006 povečati napovedi prihodkov in zmanjšati odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v proračunskih vrsticah razdelkov 1, 2 in 7 ter spremeniti pripombe k členu proračuna 1 1 1 v zvezi s skladiščenjem sladkorja in k členu 13 03 08,
A. whereas Draft amending budget No 6/2006 aims at budgeting an increase in the forecast of revenue and a decrease in payment appropriations in the budget lines for Headings 1, 2 and 7, as well as modifying the remarks of budget Article 1 1 1 concerning sugar storage and of Article 13 03 08,
B. ker gre za precejšnje povečanje napovedi prihodkov v znesku 2.667 milijonov EUR in zmanjšanje odobritev za prevzem obveznosti v znesku 4.706 milijonov EUR,
B. whereas the increase in the forecast of revenue of EUR 2 667 million and the decrease in payment appropriations of EUR 4 706 million are quite substantial,
C. ker se bodo s sprejetjem spremembe proračuna št. 6/2006 prispevki držav članic za leto 2006 zmanjšali za skupaj 7.373 milijonov EUR,
C. whereas an adoption of Amending Budget No 6/2006 will thus result in the Member States' contributions for 2006 decreasing by a total of EUR 7 373 million,
D. ker je ponavljajoče se prenizko ocenjevanje prihodkov z vsemi posledicami vprašanje, ki ga je treba podrobneje raziskati,
D. whereas the regular and systematic underestimation of revenue with all its effects should be considered as an issue deserving further scrutiny,
E. ker nizka raven izvrševanja plačil, ki so bila sprejeta v letnem proračunskem postopku, ostaja razlog za skrb,
E. whereas the low level of implementation of payments that were adopted in the annual budgetary procedure remains a constant cause for concern,
F. ker sta se obe veji proračunskega organa sporazumeli o proračunu za leto 2007, vključno z ravnjo plačil,
F. whereas the two arms of the budgetary authority have come to an agreement on the Budget for 2007, including the level of payments,
G. ker je bila sprememba proračuna št. 6/2006 vključena v ta sporazum zaradi vpliva, ki ga bo imela na raven plačil v proračunu za leto 2007,
G. whereas Amending Budget No 6/2006, due to its effects on the level of payments in the Budget for 2007, has been included in this agreement,
Predhodni predlog spremembe proračuna
Preliminary Draft Amending Budget
Komisija je 31. oktobra predstavila predhodni predlog spremembe proračuna št. 6 za leto 2006 in 17. novembra pisni predlog spremembe, s katerim namerava:
On 31 October, the Commission presented Preliminary Draft Amending Budget (PDAB) No 6 for the year 2006, and on 17 November, an Amending Letter to it, aiming at
1. bistveno povečati napoved prihodkov, in sicer za 2.667 milijonov EUR;
1. budgeting a substantial increase in the forecast of revenue of EUR 2 667 million
2. zmanjšati odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v proračunskih vrsticah razdelkov 1, 2 in 7 za 4.706 milijonov EUR;
2. decreasing payment appropriations in budget lines for Heading 1, 2 and 7 by EUR 4 706 million
3. predlagati spremembo opomb k členu proračuna 1 1 1 v zvezi s skladiščenjem sladkorja in k členu 13 03 08 (Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) – Tehnična pomoč in inovativni ukrepi).
3. proposing the modification of the remarks of budget article 1 1 1 concerning the sugar storage, as well as of article 13 03 08 – European Development Fund (ERDF), Technical assistance and innovative measures.
Povečanje napovedi prihodkov (gl. točko 1 zgoraj) je rezultat posodobitev in pomeni, da lahko države članice ustrezno zmanjšajo prispevke za proračun 2006, in sicer za 2.667 milijonov EUR.
The increase in the forecast of revenue (see point 1 above) is the result of new updates and means that the Member States can reduce their contributions to the 2006 budget accordingly, i.e. by EUR 2 667 million.
Če se ta znesek prišteje neposrednemu zmanjšanju odobritev za plačila v znesku 4.706 milijonov EUR (gl. točko 2 zgoraj), bi se prispevki držav članic za leto 2006 zmanjšali za skupaj 7.373 milijonov EUR.
If this amount is added to the straight forward decrease in payment appropriations of EUR 4 706 million (see point 2 above), Member States' contributions for 2006 would decrease by a total of EUR 7 373 million.
Po prvi oceni predlogov Komisije je poročevalec ugotovil, da bo najverjetneje treba vsaj del plačil, ki niso bila izvršena v letu 2006 (to je skoraj 5 milijard EUR), izvršiti v letu 2007.
After his first evaluation of the Commission's proposal, your rapporteur came to the conclusion that at least part of the payments not implemented in 2006 (i.e. a sum of nearly EUR 5 billion) would, most likely, have to be served in 2007.
To je bil razlog, zakaj poročevalec spremembe proračuna ni želel obravnavati kot ločenega vprašanja v okviru proračuna 2006.
This is why your rapporteur did not feel to be in a position to treat this Amending Budget as an isolated matter within the framework of Budget 2006.
Meni, da jo je treba upoštevati pri določanju ravni plačil za leto 2007.
For him it had to be taken into account when setting the level of payments for 2007.
Posledično je bila sprememba proračuna št. 6 uvrščena na dnevni red usklajevanja proračuna za leto 2007, da bi dosegli dosleden in celovit dogovor.
Consequently, Amending Budget No 6 was put on the agenda of the Conciliation for Budget 2007 in order to achieve a consistent and comprehensive agreement.
Potem ko je bil s Svetom končno dosežen sporazum o proračunu 2007, vključno z ravnjo plačil, poročevalec lahko predlaga sprejetje spremembe proračuna št. 6.
Following the final agreement with Council on Budget 2007, including the level of payments, your rapporteur is now in a position to recommend adoption of Amending Budget No 6.
Vendar želi kljub temu poudariti odgovornost Komisije za izvrševanje plačil, ki jih je določil proračunski organ v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka.
However, he still wants to underline the Commission's responsibility in implementing the payments as agreed by the budgetary authority within the framework of the annual budgetary procedure.
Zmanjšanje odobritev za prevzem obveznosti ob koncu proračunskega leta je mogoče utemeljiti samo z nepredvidenimi dogodki in bi moralo enkrat za vselej postati izjema, ne pravilo, kot se zdi v tem trenutku.
Decreasing payment appropriations at the end of the budgetary year can only be justified by unforeseen circumstances and should, once and for all, become an exemption to the rule rather than the "rule" it seems to be at the moment.
Predlog spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 6/2006 za proračunsko leto 2006
Draft amending budget No 6/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III - Commission
o Skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 999/2001 o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (14224/4/2006 – C6‑0432/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (14224/4/2006 – C6‑0432/2006 ),
Sprejeta besedila , 17.5.2006, P6_TA(2006)0212 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0775 )
Texts Adopted , 17.5.2006, P6_TA(2006)0212 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0775 )
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0445/2006 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0445/2006 ),
Skupno stališče Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 999/2001 o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem in poslabšanjem, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3658/2006 – C6-0382/2006 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3658/2006 – C6‑0382/2006 ),
15. o predlogu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0550 )
15. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0550 )
Še ni objavljeno v UL. , ter o spremenjenem predlogu ( KOM(2005)0282 ),
Not yet published in OJ. and on the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0282 ),
Sprejeta besedila z dne 13.6.2006, P6_TA(2006/0251). o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts Adopted, 13.6.2006, P6_TA(2006)0251 . on the Council common position
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2006)0434 )
– having regard to the Commission’s opinion on Parliament’s amendments to the common position ( COM(2006)0434 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(5) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Article 251(5) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6-0446/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0446/2006 ),
Podzemna voda je pomemben naravni vir, saj predstavlja rezervoar za pridobivanje kakovostne vode za oskrbo s pitno vodo ter uporabo v industriji ali kmetijstvu.
Groundwater is an important natural resource, forming a reservoir from which high-quality water is obtained for use as drinking water and in industry and agriculture.
Predpise v zvezi z varstvom podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem vsebujeta tako direktiva o podzemni vodi 80/68/EGS kot tudi okvirna direktiva o vodah 2000/60/ES.
The Groundwater Directive (80/68/EEC) and the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) both contain provisions on the protection of groundwater against pollution.
Vendar pa bo direktiva o podzemni vodi iz leta 1980 preklicana leta 2013, saj okvirna direktiva o vodah, razen dveh izjem, ureja tudi ključne zahteve na področju varstva podzemne vode.
However, the 1980 Groundwater Directive is to be repealed in 2013, since, with two exceptions, the Water Framework Directive also covers the key requirements for the protection of groundwater.
Evropska komisija je 19. septembra 2003 predložila predlog direktive o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem, kot je določeno v členu 17 okvirne direktive o vodah.
On 19 September 2003 the European Commission presented a proposal for a directive on the protection of groundwater against pollution, as called for in Article 17 of the Water Framework Directive.
Po prvi obravnavi v Parlamentu 28. aprila 2005 je Svet 23. januarja 2006 sprejel svoje skupno stališče.
Following Parliament’s first reading of 28 April 2005, the Council adopted its Common Position on 23 January 2006.
To besedilo po mnenju Evropskega parlamenta ni omogočalo vzpostavitve jasne, ciljno naravnane in zadovoljive ureditve za varstvo podzemne vode v Evropi.
Parliament did not regard that text as a suitable means of establishing a clear, effective and adequate set of rules on the protection of groundwater in Europe.
Parlament je zato v drugi obravnavi 13. junija 2006 sprejel skupno 41 predlogov sprememb k skupnemu stališču Sveta.
At second reading, on 13 June 2006, it therefore adopted a total of 41 amendments to the Council’s Common Position.
Spravni postopek se je nato uradno začel 17. oktobra.
That procedure was then formally opened on 17 October 2006.
Ustanovna seja delegacije Parlamenta je potekala 5. julija 2006 v Strasbourgu.
Parliament’s delegation held its constituent meeting on 5 July 2006 in Strasbourg.
Od 5. septembra do 10. oktobra 2006 so se zvrstila tri srečanja (5. septembra, 19. septembra in 10. oktobra2006), na katerih so delegacijo Evropskega parlamenta sestavljali Dagmar Roth-Behrendt (podpredsednica Evropskega parlamenta in predsednica delegacije), Karl-Heinz Florenz (predsednik Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane) in Christa Klaß (poročevalka).
Between 5 September and 10 October 2006 three trialogues took place (5 September 2006, 19 September 2006 and 10 October 2006) at which the EP delegation was represented by Mrs Roth-Behrendt, EP Vice-President and Chairwoman of the delegation, Mr Florenz, Chairman of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, and Mrs Klaß, rapporteur.
Po vsakem od teh srečanj je sledil sestanek delegacije Evropskega parlamenta (6. septembra, 27. septembra in 10. oktobra2006).
Parliament’s delegation held meetings after each of the trialogues (6 September 2006, 27 September 2006 and 10 October 2006).
Izid teh sestankov je bil predhodni dogovor o 24 predlogih sprememb, odvisen od splošnega dogovora.
These meetings led to provisional agreement on 24 amendments, subject to overall agreement being reached on the text.
Spravni odbor se je sestal 17. oktobra 2006 zvečer, da bi uradno začel postopek in poskušal poiskati možnosti za dogovor o še odprtih vprašanjih.
The Conciliation Committee met on the evening of 17 October 2006 to formally open the procedure and with a view to resolving outstanding issues.
Po večurnem posvetovanju je bil malo pred polnočjo dosežen splošni dogovor.
After several hours of discussions, overall agreement was reached shortly before midnight.
Delegacija Evropskega parlamenta je izid pogajanj potrdila s 16 glasovi za in 4 vzdržanimi.
The outcome of the negotiations was confirmed by Parliament’s delegation by 16 votes in favour, with 4 abstentions.
Izid spravnega postopka
Outcome of the conciliation procedure