natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To je treba ustrezno upoštevati.
This must be duly appreciated.
Če se zaradi strukturnih zamikov prekoračitev inflacijske stopnje pričakuje tudi v naslednjih letih (zaustavitev obeh jedrskih elektrarn v Ignalini in s tem povezano trajno naraščanje stroškov energije), potem po prepričanju poročevalca odstopanje za Litvo ne pride v poštev.
However, if overshooting of the inflation rate is also to be expected in the next few years on account of structural changes (closure of both nuclear power stations at Ignalina and the associated long-term increase in energy costs), your rapporteur is convinced that there must be no derogation for Lithuania.
S tem v zvezi gre pozdraviti odločitev Estonije, ki je kljub gospodarski dinamiki umaknila prošnjo za pridružitev v tem trenutku, ker trenutno ne more izpolniti meril iz Maastrichtske pogodbe v zvezi s stopnjo inflacije in proračunskim primanjkljajem.
In this connection, Estonia's decision is to be welcomed: despite great economic dynamism it has currently withdrawn its application to join the euro, because at present it cannot fulfil the Maastricht Treaty conditions with regard to inflation and the budget deficit.
o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah
on the proposal for a Council framework decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters
PE 370.250
PE 370.250v02-00
OBRAZLOŽITVENI MEMORANDUM..................................................................................38
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................42
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0475 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0475 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0436/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0436/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 93 in 51 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 93 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0192/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0192/2006 ),
- ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 30, člena 31 in člena 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 30, Article 31 and Article 34(2)(b) thereof,
- ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 29 ter členov 30(1)(b), 31(1)(c) in 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29, Article 30(1)(b), Article 31(1)(c) and Article 34(2)(b) thereof,
(9) Zagotavljanje visoke stopnje varstva osebnih podatkov evropskih državljanov zahteva skupne določbe za zagotovitev zakonitosti in kakovosti podatkov, ki jih obdelujejo pristojni organi v drugih državah članicah.
(9) Ensuring a high level of protection of the personal data of European citizens requires common provisions to determine the lawfulness and the quality of data processed by competent authorities in other Member States.
Evropska unija mora varstvo zagotoviti ne le evropskim državljanom, ampak tudi državljanom drugih držav.
The European Union should afford the same protection not only to European citizens but to citizens of any other country .
(12) Kjer se osebni podatki prenašajo iz države članice Evropske unije v tretje države ali mednarodne organe, mora biti za te podatke načeloma zagotovljena ustrezna raven varstva.
(12) Where personal data are transferred from a Member State of the European Union to third countries or international bodies, these data should , in principle, benefit from an adequate level of protection.
(12) Kjer se osebni podatki prenašajo iz države članice Evropske unije v tretje države ali mednarodne organe, mora biti za te podatke zagotovljena ustrezna raven varstva.
(12) Where personal data are transferred from a Member State of the European Union to third countries or international bodies, these data should benefit from an adequate level of protection.
Predlagani okvirni sklep mora zagotoviti, da so osebni podatki iz tretjih držav skladni vsaj z mednarodnimi standardi o spoštovanju človekovih pravic.
This Framework Decision should ensure that personal data received from third countries comply at least with international standards on the respect of human rights.
Izmenjava podatkov s tretjimi državami mora potekati ob upoštevanju dveh glavnih načel, in sicer da se podatki lahko prenašajo le v tretje države, ki zagotavljajo ustrezno raven njihovega varstva, in da morajo biti podatki, prejeti iz tretjih držav, v skladu s temeljnimi pravicami.
Exchanges of data with third countries must respect two fundamental principles: they must ensure that the data can be transferred only to third countries which guarantee an appropriate standard of data protection and that data received from third countries respect fundamental rights.
(15) Primerno je vzpostaviti skupna pravila o zaupnosti in varnosti obdelave, o odgovornostih in sankcijah za nezakonito uporabo pri pristojnih organih ter o pravnih sredstvih, ki so na voljo posamezniku, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo.
(15) It is appropriate to establish common rules on the confidentiality and security of the processing, on liability and sanctions for unlawful use by competent authorities as well as judicial remedies available for the data subject.
Poleg tega bi morale države članice zagotoviti kazenske sankcije za težje in namerne kršitve določb o varstvu podatkov.
Furthermore, it is necessary that Member States provide for criminal sanctions for particularly serious and intentionally committed infringements of data protection provisions.
(15) Primerno je vzpostaviti skupna pravila o zaupnosti in varnosti obdelave, o odgovornostih in sankcijah za nezakonito uporabo pri pristojnih organih in zasebnih strankah, ki obdelujejo osebne podatke v imenu pristojnih organov ali v okviru javne funkcije, ter o pravnih sredstvih, ki so na voljo posamezniku, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo.
(15) It is appropriate to establish common rules on the confidentiality and security of the processing, on liability and sanctions for unlawful use by competent authorities and by private parties processing personal data on behalf of competent authorities or in a public function, as well as judicial remedies available for the data subject.
Pomembno je določiti, da se podatke, kadar z njimi upravljajo zasebne stranke, zlasti v okviru javno-zasebnih partnerstev, obdeluje vsaj pod enakimi pogoji za varstvo podatkov kot podatke, ki so predvideni za javne pristojne organe.
It is important to state that where the data are managed by private parties, particularly in connection with public-private partnerships, they are subject, at the minimum, to the same data security conditions as laid down for the public competent authorities.
Poleg tega bi morale države članice zagotoviti kazenske sankcije za težje in namerne ali izredno malomarne kršitve določb o varstvu podatkov.
Furthermore, it is necessary that Member States provide for criminal sanctions for particularly serious and intentional or grossly negligent infringements of data protection provisions.
(20) Ta okvirni sklep ne posega v posebne določbe o varstvu podatkov, določene v ustreznih pravnih aktih, ki so povezane z obdelavo in varstvom osebnih podatkov v Europolu, Eurojustu in carinskem informacijskem sistemu.
(20) The present Framework Decision is without prejudice to the specific data protection provisions laid down in the relevant legal instruments relating to the processing and protection of personal data by Europol, Eurojust and the Customs Information System.
Vseeno je treba najpozneje štiri leta po datumu iz člena 35(1) posebne določbe o varstvu podatkov, ki veljajo za Europol, Eurojust in carinski informacijski sistem, v celoti uskladiti s predlaganim okvirnim sklepom, da se izboljšata doslednost in učinkovitost pravnega okvira o varstvu podatkov v skladu s predlogom Komisije.
However, at the latest 2 years after the date referred to in Article 35(1), the specific data protection provisions applicable to Europol, Eurojust and the Customs Information System should be made fully consistent with the present Framework Decision, with a view to enhancing the consistency and effectiveness of the legal framework on data protection pursuant to a proposal by the Commission.
(20a) Europol, Eurojust in carinski informacijski sistem morajo obdržati tiste predpise o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki jasno zagotavljajo, da se osebni podatki lahko obdelajo, se vanje vpogleda ali se jih posreduje naprej le na podlagi natančneje določenih in/ali zaščitnih pogojev ali omejitev.
(20a) Europol, Eurojust and the Customs Information System should retain those of their data protection rules which clearly provide that personal data may be processed, consulted or transmitted only on the basis of more specific and/or protective conditions or restrictions.
(22) Ustrezno je, da se ta okvirni sklep uporablja za osebne podatke, ki se obdelujejo v okviru druge generacije šengenskega informacijskega sistema in povezane izmenjave dopolnilnih informacij na podlagi Sklepa JHA/2006 …. o ustanovitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije šengenskega informacijskega sistema.
(22) It is appropriate that this Framework Decision applies to the personal data which are processed in the framework of the second generation of the Schengen Information System and the related exchange of supplementary information pursuant to Decision JHA/2006/ … on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen information system.
Ustrezno je, da se ta okvirni sklep uporablja za osebne podatke, ki se obdelujejo v okviru druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema in povezane izmenjave dopolnilnih informacij na podlagi Sklepa JHA/2006 …. o ustanovitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema in v okviru vizumskega informacijskega sistema, v skladu s Sklepom JHA/2006 ... o posvetovalnem dostopu do vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS) s strani pristojnih organov držav članic in Evropskega urada za policijo Europol.
(22) It is appropriate that this Framework Decision applies to the personal data which are processed in the framework of the second generation of the Schengen Information System and the related exchange of supplementary information pursuant to Decision JHA/2006/ … on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen information system and in the context of the Visa Information System pursuant to Decision JHA/2006/... on access for consultation purposes to the Visa Information System VIS by the competent authorities of the Member States and by the European Police Office Europol.
Treba se je sklicevati tudi na VIS, da se lahko predlagani okvirni sklep uporablja tudi za dostop organov pregona do vizumskega informacijskega sistema.
It is appropriate to insert a reference to the VIS to ensure that this Framework Decision also applies to access to the visa information system by the forces of law and order.
Uvodna izjava 35 a (novo)
Citation 35 a (new)
35 (a) ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov,
(35a) Having regard to the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor,
Pri oblikovanju predlaganega okvirnega sklepa je nujno upoštevati mnenje Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov.
It is essential to take account of the opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor in drafting this framework decision.
Države članice zagotovijo, da razkritje osebnih podatkov pristojnim organom drugih držav članic ni niti omejeno niti prepovedano zaradi razlogov, povezanih z varstvom osebnih podatkov, kot je predvideno po tem okvirnem sporazumu.
Member States shall ensure that the disclosure of personal data to the competent authorities of other Member States is neither restricted nor prohibited for reasons connected with the protection of personal data as provided for in this Framework Decision.
Predlagani okvirni sklep državam članicam ne preprečuje, da pri zaščiti osebnih podatkov na področju policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja uvedejo zaščitne ukrepe, ki so strožji od tistih v okvirnem sklepu.
This Framework Decision does not preclude Member States from providing safeguards for the protection of personal data in the context of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters greater than those established in this Framework Decision.
Vendar pa takšne določbe ne smejo omejevati ali prepovedovati razkritja osebnih podatkov pristojnim organom drugih držav članic zaradi razlogov, povezanih z varstvom osebnih podatkov, kot je predvideno po tem okvirnem sporazumu.
However, any such provisions may not restrict or prohibit the disclosure of personal data to the competent authorities of other Member States for reasons connected with the protection of personal data as provided for in this Framework Decision.
Predlagani okvirni sklep ne sme prepovedovati posebne zakonodaje, ki ureja predvsem obdelavo podatkov.
This Framework Decision should not preclude more specific legislation, particularly governing data processing.
Člen 4, odstavek 1, točka d)
Article 4, paragraph 1, point (d)
d) točni in po potrebi posodobljeni.
(d) accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date.
Uporabiti je treba vse primerne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se podatki, ki so netočni ali nepopolni, zbrišejo ali popravijo, ob upoštevanju namenov, za katere so bili zbrani ali za katere se naprej obdelujejo.
Every reasonable step must be taken to ensure that data which are inaccurate or incomplete, having regard to the purposes for which they were collected or for which they are further processed, are erased or rectified.
Države članice lahko zagotovijo obdelavo podatkov do različnih stopenj točnosti in zanesljivosti, v takih primerih pa morajo zagotoviti, da se podatki razlikujejo glede na stopnjo točnosti in zanesljivosti, ter zlasti, da se podatki, ki temeljijo na dejstvih, razlikujejo od podatkov, ki temeljijo na mnenjih ali osebnih presojah;
Member States may provide for the processing of data to varying degrees of accuracy and reliability in which case they must provide that data are distinguished in accordance with their degree of accuracy and reliability, and in particular that data based on facts are distinguished from data based on opinions or personal assessments;
Države članice sicer lahko zagotovijo obdelavo podatkov do različnih stopenj točnosti in zanesljivosti, v takih primerih pa morajo zagotoviti, da se podatki razlikujejo glede na stopnjo točnosti in zanesljivosti, ter zlasti, da se podatki, ki temeljijo na dejstvih, razlikujejo od podatkov, ki temeljijo na mnenjih ali osebnih presojah.
However, Member States may provide for the processing of data to varying degrees of accuracy and reliability in which case they must provide that data are distinguished in accordance with their degree of accuracy and reliability, and in particular that data based on facts are distinguished from data based on opinions or personal assessments; Member States shall provide that the quality of personal data is verified regularly.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se kakovost osebnih podatkov redno preverja.
As far as possible, judicial decisions as well as decisions not to prosecute shall be indicated and data based on opinions or personal assessments checked at source and their degree of accuracy or reliability indicated.
Kolikor je to mogoče, se navedejo sodne odločbe in sklepi o nepreganjanju, podatke, ki temeljijo na mnenjih ali osebnih ocenah, pa se preveri pri viru, pri čemer se navede njihova stopnja točnosti ali zanesljivosti.
Member States shall, without prejudice to national criminal procedure, provide that personal data are marked on request of the data subject if their accuracy is denied by the data subject and if their accuracy or inaccuracy cannot be ascertained.
Države članice brez poseganja v nacionalni kazenski postopek zagotovijo, da se v primeru, ko posameznik, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo, zanika njihovo točnost in ko se točnosti ali netočnosti ne da preveriti, osebne podatke na posameznikovo zahtevo „označi”. „Oznaka” se izbriše le s soglasjem posameznika, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo, ali na podlagi sklepa pristojnega sodišča ali pristojnega nadzornega organa;
Such mark shall only be deleted with the consent of the data subject or on the basis of a decision of the competent court or of the competent supervisory authority;
Zgornji odstavek se premakne iz člena 9, odstavka 6.
This paragraph is repositioned from Article 9(6).
Te določbe je dejansko treba prestaviti iz poglavja III v poglavje II, da bodo veljale za vse oblike obdelave osebnih podatkov, ki jih opravljajo organi pregona, in ne le za podatke, izmenjane med državami članicami.
These provisions should be moved from Chapter III to Chapter II so that they apply to all processing of data by the forces of law and order and not only to data exchanged between Member States.
Države članice zagotovijo, da je obdelava osebnih podatkov potrebna le, če
Member States shall provide that processing of personal data is only necessary if
- ni nobenih drugih sredstev, ki bi manj vplivala na posameznika, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo, in
- there is no other means less affecting the data subject and
Ubeseditev ne upošteva meril sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v zvezi s členom 8 Evropske konvencije za zaščito človekovih pravic.
This formulation does not respect the criteria established by the case law of the European Court of Human Rights relating to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Sodna praksa predvideva, da je mogoče pravice do zasebnosti omejiti le, če je to nujno v demokratični družbi, in ne, če bi to olajšalo ali pospešilo delo policijskih ali pravosodnih organov.
The case law provides that it is possible to impose restrictions on the right to private life only if that is necessary in a democratic society and not if it would facilitate or accelerate the work of police or judicial authorities.
Predvidene določbe je treba torej nadomestiti.
It is therefore necessary to replace it.
Načelo potrebe po podatkih in njihovi sorazmernosti bo na novo opredeljeno v členu 5.
The criterion of necessity and proportionality of data will be reformulated in Article 5.
Osebni podatki o osebah, ki niso osumljenci, se obdelajo le za namen, za katerega so bili zbrani, in to v omejenem časovnem obdobju in s primernimi omejitvami pri dostopu in posredovanju.
Personal data related to non-suspects shall be processed only for the purpose for which they were collected, for a limited period of time, with adequate limitations on access to them and on their transmission.
Razlikovanje med različnimi vrstami podatkov iz odstavka 3 je zelo uporabno.
The distinction between the various types of data made in paragraph 3 is very useful.
Treba ga je izboljšati s posebno obravnavo podatkov o osebah, ki niso osumljenci, ki jih je treba pri zbiranju podatkov, rokih za shranjevanje in pogojih za dostop organov razvrstiti po načelih posebne zaščite.
It should be enhanced, devoting particular attention to data concerning non-suspects, to which specific protection measures must apply as regards the conditions for collecting data, the storage period and arrangements for access by the authorities.
Člen 4 a, odstavek 1 (novo)
Article 4a, paragraph 1 (new)
Člen 4 (a)
Article 4a
Nadaljnja obdelava osebnih podatkov
Further processing of personal data
Države članice zagotovijo, da se osebni podatki lahko nadalje obdelujejo le v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom, in zlasti s členi 4, 5 in 6:
Member States shall provide that personal data may be further processed only in accordance with this Framework Decision, in particular Articles 4, 5 and 6 hereof,
(a) za poseben namen, za katerega so bili poslani ali dani na voljo,
(a) for the specific purpose for which they were transmitted or made available,
(b) če je to nujno za namen preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona posebnih hudih kaznivih dejanj ali
(b) if strictly necessary, for the purpose of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences, or
(c) za namen preprečevanja nevarnosti za javno varnost ali človeka, razen kadar nad tem prevlada potreba po zaščiti interesov ali temeljnih pravic posameznika, na katerega se podatki nanašajo.
(c) for the purpose of the prevention of threats to public security or to a person, except where such considerations are overridden by the need to protect the interests or fundamental rights of the data subject.
Zadevni osebni podatki se nato obdelajo za namene, navedene v odstavku 1(c) tega člena, le ob predhodnem soglasju organa, ki je podatke poslal ali dal na voljo, države članice pa lahko ob upoštevanju ustreznih pravnih nadzornih ukrepov sprejmejo zakonodajne ukrepe ter omogočijo nadaljnjo obdelavo.
The personal data concerned shall be further processed for the purposes referred to in paragraph 1 (c) of this article only with the prior consent of the authority that transmitted or made available the personal data and the Member States may, subject to adequate legal safeguards, adopt legislative measures to allow this further processing.
Glej obrazložitev prejšnjega predloga spremembe.
See the justification for Amendment 14.
Države članice zagotovijo, da pristojni organi lahko obdelujejo osebne podatke, samo če to predvideva zakon, ki določa, da je obdelava potrebna za izpolnitev zakonite naloge zadevnega organa in za namen preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj.
Member States shall provide that personal data may be processed by the competent authorities only if provided for by a law setting out that the processing is necessary for the fulfilment of the legitimate task of the authority concerned and for the purpose of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences.
Države članice po posvetovanju z nadzornimi organi, predvidenimi s členom 30, zagotovijo, da pristojni organi lahko obdelujejo osebne podatke, le če:
Member States shall, after consulting the supervisory authority established in Article 30, provide that personal data may be processed by the competent authorities only if:
(a) to predvideva zakon, ki določa, da je obdelava potrebna za izpolnitev zakonite naloge zadevnega organa in za namen preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj.
(a) provided for by a law setting out that the processing is necessary for the fulfilment of the legitimate task of the authority concerned and for the purpose of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences.
(b) je posameznik, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo, dal nedvoumno soglasje in se obdelava izvaja v njegovem interesu; ali
(b) the data subject has unambiguously given his consent, provided that the processing is carried out in the interest of the data subject; or
(c) je obdelava potrebna za izpolnitev zakonske obveznosti, ki velja za nadzornika; ali
(c) processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject; or
(d) je obdelava potrebna, da se zaščitijo ključni interesi posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo podatki.
(d) processing is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the data subject.
- lahko pristojni organi na podlagi dejstev dokažejo resnično nujnost obdelave zadevnih osebnih podatkov za preprečevanje, preiskovanje, odkrivanje ali pregon kaznivega dejanja,
- competent authorities can demonstrate, based on established facts, a clear need to process the personal data concerned for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of a criminal offence, and
- ni drugega načina, ki bi imel manjše posledice za posameznika, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo, in
- there is no other means less affecting the data subject and
obdelava podatkov ni preobsežna glede na zadevno kaznivo dejanje.
- the processing of the data is not excessive in relation to the offence concerned.