natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar se od matičnega podjetja zahteva, da združi svoje deleže z deleži, ki jih upravlja hčerinsko podjetje, če je matično podjetje ali drugo podjetje, s katerim upravlja matično podjetje, pridobilo deleže, s katerimi upravlja taka družba za upravljanje ali investicijska družba ali podjetje iz tretje države, in slednje ne more neodvisno uveljavljati glasovalnih pravic, vezanih na te deleže, in te glasovalne pravice lahko uveljavlja le z neposrednimi ali posrednimi navodili matičnega podjetja ali drugega podjetja, s katerim upravlja matično podjetje.
However, a parent undertaking shall be required to aggregate its holdings with the holdings managed by a subsidiary undertaking where the parent undertaking, or another controlled undertaking of the parent undertaking, has invested in holdings managed by such management company or investment firm or third-country undertaking and the latter has no discretion to exercise the voting rights attached to such holdings and may exercise such voting rights only under direct or indirect instructions from the parent or another controlled undertaking of the parent undertaking.
Člen 1, točka 3
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3
Člen 15 a, odstavek 1, pododstavek 2 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 a, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Pristojni organi imajo na voljo največ trideset delovnih dni po datumu pisnega potrdila o prejemu, v nadaljevanju „ocenjevalno obdobje“, da nasprotujejo predlogu predlaganega pridobitelja.
The competent authorities shall have a maximum of thirty working days from the date of the written acknowledgement of receipt, hereinafter "assessment period", to oppose the proposal of the proposed acquirer.
Pristojni organi imajo na voljo največ sedeminštirideset delovnih dni po datumu pisnega potrdila o prejemu, v nadaljevanju „ocenjevalno obdobje“, da nasprotujejo predlogu predlaganega pridobitelja.
The competent authorities shall have a maximum of forty-seven working days from the date of the written acknowledgement of receipt, hereinafter "assessment period", to oppose the proposal of the proposed acquirer.
Nadzorni organi morajo imeti dovolj časa, da lahko ocenijo vse dokumente in potem sprejmejo odločitev.
Supervisory authorities need to dispose of sufficient time allowing them to evaluate all documents in order to take decision.
To je posebej pomembno, saj isti časovni okvir velja za čezmejne in medsektorske primere.
This is of particular relevance as far as the same timeframe applies to cross-border and cross-sectoral cases.
Člen 15 a, odstavek 2, pododstavek 1 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 a, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Pristojni organi lahko po potrebi v petih delovnih dneh po datumu potrditve prejema iz prvega pododstavka odstavka 1 zahtevajo dodatne informacije za izvedbo ocene iz člena 15b(1) .
The competent authorities may if necessary, request further information within five working days of the date of the acknowledgment of receipt referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, in order to carry out the assessment referred to in Article 15b(1).
Pristojni organi lahko po potrebi v desetih delovnih dneh po datumu potrditve prejema iz prvega pododstavka odstavka 1 zahtevajo dodatne informacije , ki se neposredno nanašajo na merila iz člena 15b(1) za izvedbo ocene iz tega člena .
The competent authorities may if necessary, request further information directly related to the criteria in Article 15 b(1) within ten working days of the date of the acknowledgment of receipt referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, in order to carry out the assessment referred to in this Article .
S podaljšanjem obdobja za zahtevo dodatnih informacij, imajo pristojni organi več časa za pripravo analize potrebnih informacij za primerno oceno pred ustavitvijo postopka.
By setting a longer period for request of additional information, competent authorities will have more time to make an analysis of the information needed for a proper assessment before stopping the clock.
To dejansko ne bo vplivalo na podaljšanje najdaljšega ocenjevalnega obdobja.
In fact, this will not result in any prolongation of the maximum assessment period.
Ocenjevalno obdobje bo ostalo isto, saj se postopek lahko ustavi le enkrat in le za določeno obdobje desetih delovnih dni.
The assessment period will remain the same as the clock may be stopped only once and only for a limited period of ten working days.
Člen 15 a, odstavek 2, pododstavek 3 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 a, paragraph 2, subparagraph 3 (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Zahtevane informacije je treba pristojnim organom predložiti v desetih delovnih dneh .
The information requested shall be provided to the competent authorities within ten working days .
Za čas, ki poteče od datuma, ko pristojni organi zahtevajo informacije, do datuma, ko prejmejo odgovor predlaganega pridobitelja, se ocenjevalno obdobje prekine.
For the period between the date of request for information by the competent authorities and the receipt of a response thereto by the proposed acquirer, the assessment period shall be interrupted.
Prekinitev ne sme presegati desetih delovnih dni.
The interruption shall not exceed ten working days.
Če pristojni organi zahtevajo še dodatne informacije, se zaradi tega ocenjevalno obdobje ne prekine.
Any further requests for information by the competent authorities may not result in an interruption of the assessment period.
Zahtevane informacije je treba predložiti pristojnim organom.
The information requested shall be provided to the competent authorities.
Če pristojni organi zahtevajo še dodatne informacije, lahko to storijo izključno zaradi dopolnitve ali pojasnitve informacij, s katerimi že razpolagajo, in zaradi tega se ocenjevalno obdobje ne prekine.
Any further requests for information by the competent authorities shall be made for the sole purpose of completing or clarifying the information already in their possession and may not result in an interruption of the assessment period.
Člen 15 a, odstavek 3 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 a, paragraph 3 (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Če se pristojni organi po opravljeni oceni odločijo , da bodo predlagani pridobitvi ali predlaganemu povečanju deleža nasprotovali, o tem v dveh delovnih dneh in pred iztekom obdobja iz drugega pododstavka člena 15(a)(1) pisno obvestijo predlaganega pridobitelja in navedejo razloge za svojo odločitev.
If the competent authorities, upon completion of their assessment, decide to oppose the proposed acquisition or the proposed increase of holding , they shall, within two working days, and not going beyond the period mentioned in Art. 15 a (1) second subparagraph, inform the proposed acquirer in writing and provide the reasons for the decision.
Ko pristojni organi po opravljeni oceni sprejmejo odločitev , da bodo predlagani pridobitvi nasprotovali ali jo odobrili , o tem v dveh delovnih dneh in pred iztekom obdobja iz drugega pododstavka člena 15(a)(1) pisno obvestijo predlaganega pridobitelja in zagotovijo ustrezno izjavo z razlogi za svojo odločitev , ki je dostopna javnosti .
When the competent authorities, upon completion of their assessment, take the decision to oppose or authorise the proposed acquisition, they shall, within two working days, and not going beyond the period mentioned in Art. 15a(1) second subparagraph, inform the proposed acquirer in writing and provide an adequate statement of reasons for the decision , which is accessible to the public ;
Člen 15 a, odstavek 5 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 a, paragraph 5 (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Pristojni organi lahko ocenjevalno obdobje podaljšajo na največ 50 delovnih dni, če za predlaganega pridobitelja velja zakonodaja zunaj Skupnosti in ima sedež v tretji državi, kjer obstajajo zakonske ovire za prenos potrebnih informacij .
The competent authorities may extend the assessment period to a maximum of fifty working days if the proposed acquirer is regulated outside the Community and is situated in a third country where there are legal impediments to the transfer of the necessary information.
Pristojni organi lahko ocenjevalno obdobje podaljšajo na največ 77 delovnih dni, če za predlaganega pridobitelja velja zakonodaja zunaj Skupnosti in ima tudi sedež zunaj Skupnosti.
The competent authorities may extend the assessment period to a maximum of seventy-seven working days if the proposed acquirer is situated or regulated outside the Community.
Nadzorni organi morajo imeti dovolj časa, da lahko ocenijo vse dokumente in potem sprejmejo odločitev.
Supervisory authorities need to have sufficient time allowing them to evaluate all documents in order to take decision.
Poleg tega je za izvedbo primerne ocene potrebno več časa, če ima predlagani pridobitelj, naj bo reguliran ali nereguliran subjekt ali fizična oseba, sedež v tretji državi.
In addition, if the proposed acquirer, be it a regulated, non-regulated entity or natural person, is situated in a third country, more time needs to be added to carry out a proper assessment.
Člen 1, točka 3 Člen 15 a, odstavek 6 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 Article 15 a, paragraph 6 (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Pristojni organi lahko določijo skrajni rok za izvedbo predlagane pridobitve ali povečanje deleža.
The competent authorities may fix a maximum period for the completion of the proposed acquisition or the increase of holding.
Pristojni organi lahko določijo skrajni rok najmanj 90 dni za izvedbo predlagane pridobitve ali povečanje deleža in ta rok po potrebi podaljšajo.
The competent authorities may fix a maximum period of at least 90 days for the completion of the proposed acquisition or the increase of holding and extend that period where appropriate.
Pri skrajnem roku za izvedbo predlagane pridobitve je treba predvideti možnost podaljšanja, saj je zelo težko z gotovostjo oceniti, kako dolgo bo tak postopek potekal.
The maximum period for concluding a proposed acquisition should be renewable because it could be difficult to assess with certainty the timeframe for the completion of an acquisition.
Vprašanja v zvezi z izvedbo so lahko odvisna od tržnih dejavnikov in različnih spremenljivk.
Settling completion issues may depend on elements that are market-driven and subject to different variables.
Če bo skrajni rok za izvedbo najmanj 90 dni, ne bo mogoče načrtno določiti prekratkih rokov.
Providing a minimum of 90 days for such maximum completion dates will obviate the setting of intentionally obstructive short limits.
Člen 15 a, odstavek 6 a (novo) (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 a, paragraph 6 a (new) (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Predlagan pridobitelj, ki je družba za upravljanje iz člena 1a(2) Direktive 85/611/EGS ali investicijska družba, pooblaščena za upravljanje portfelja iz točke 4, oddelka A, priloge I k Direktivi 2004/39/ES, ki upravlja deleže pod pogoji, enakimi tistim iz Direktive 85/611/EGS, se lahko odloči predložiti obvestilo iz odstavka 1 pred sprejetjem odločitve, opredeljene v tem odstavku, da bi pridobil predhodno odobritev za nakup ali povečanje kvalificiranega deleža nad 10-odstotnim pragom.
A proposed acquirer which is a management company as defined in Article 1a(2) of Directive 85/611/EEC or an investment firm authorised to provide portfolio management as provided for by point 4 of Section A of Annex I, Directive 2004/39/EC, managing holdings under conditions equivalent to those provided for in Directive 85/611/EEC, may elect to submit the notification referred to in paragraph 1 before it has taken the decision referred to in that paragraph, with a view to obtaining advanced approval for the acquisition or the increase of a qualifying holding to above the 10% threshold .
Pristojni organi lahko v ustreznih primerih omejijo skupno raven kvalificiranega deleža, in sicer po njegovem nakupu ali povečanju.
The competent authorities may impose a limit on the overall level of the qualifying holding following the acquisition or increase in appropriate cases.
Člen 15 a, odstavek 6 b (novo) (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 a, paragraph 6 b (new) (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Predlagan pridobitelj, ki je družba za upravljanje iz člena 1a(2) Direktive 85/611/EGS ali investicijska družba, pooblaščena za upravljanje portfelja iz točke 4, oddelka A, priloge I k Direktivi 2004/39/ES, ki upravlja deleže pod pogoji, enakimi tistim iz Direktive 85/611/EGS, lahko predloži obvestilo iz odstavka 1 potem, ko je opravil predlagano pridobitev ali povečal kvalificirani delež, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
A proposed acquirer which is a management company as defined in Article 1a(2) of Directive 85/611/EEC or an investment firm authorised to provide portfolio management services as provided for by point 4 of Section A of Annex 1 to Directive 2004/39/EEC, managing holdings under conditions equivalent to those provided for under Directive 85/611/EEC, may submit the notification referred to in paragraph 1 after it has completed a proposed acquisition or increase in a qualifying holding provided that the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) predlagani pridobitelj predloži obvestilo iz odstavka 1 v petih delovnih dneh od zaključka pridobitve ali povečanja; in
(i) the proposed acquirer submits the notification required under paragraph 1 within five working days of completion of the acquisition or increase; and
(ii) če glasovalne pravice, vezane na kvalificirani delež, presegajo prag 10 %, se ne uveljavljajo, dokler pristojni organi ne sprejmejo ustrezne odločitve.
(ii) the voting rights attached to the qualifying holding, to the extent that it exceeds the 10% threshold, are not exercised until the competent authority has determined the application.
Če se pristojni organi pozneje odločijo, da bodo nasprotovali pridobitvi ali povečanju, lahko zahtevajo, da predlagani pridobitelj zmanjša svoj delež pod ustreznim pragom in, dokler tega ne stori, zagotovi, da se izvajanje ustreznih glasovalnih pravic prekine ali da se razveljavijo oddani glasovi ali omogoči njihova razveljavitev.
If the competent authorities subsequently decide to oppose the acquisition or increase, they may require the proposed acquirer to reduce its holding below the relevant threshold and, pending such reduction, provide for the exercise of the corresponding voting rights to be suspended, for the nullity of votes cast, or for the possibility of their annulment.
Člen 1, točka 3 Člen 15 a, odstavek 6 c (novo) (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 Article 15 a, paragraph 6 c (new) (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Države članice ne smejo predpisati strožjih zahtev glede obveščanja pristojnih organov in njihove odobritve neposrednih ali posrednih pridobitev glasovalnih pravic ali kapitala od tistih, ki so določene v tej direktivi.
Member States may not impose requirements for notification to and approval by the competent authorities of direct or indirect acquisitions of voting rights or capital that are more stringent than those set out in this Directive.
Člen 1, točka 3 Člen 15 b, odstavek 1, točka a (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 Article 15 b, paragraph 1, point a (Directive 92/49/EEC)
(a) ugled predlaganega pridobitelja ;
(a) the reputation of the proposed acquirer;
(a) ugled predlaganega pridobitelja .
a) the reputation of the proposed acquirer.
V zvezi s tem pogojem bodo pridobitelji, za katere velja zakonodaja Skupnosti, ocenjeni z blažjimi merili;
The assessment of any acquirer that is regulated within the Community shall be facilitated in respect of this criterion;
Člen 1, točka 3 Člen 15 b, odstavek 1, točka (d) (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 Article 15 b, paragraph 1, point (d) (Directive 92/49/EEC)
(d) ali bo zavarovalnica po predlagani pridobitvi lahko izpolnila in naprej izpolnjevala svoje obveznosti iz te direktive in vsa veljavna sektorska pravila v smislu člena 2(7) Direktive 2002/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ;
(d) whether the insurance undertaking will be able to meet and continue to meet its obligations under this Directive and any applicable sectoral rules within the meaning of Article 2(7) of Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council following the proposed acquisition;
(d) ali bo zavarovalnica lahko izpolnila in naprej izpolnjevala zahteve skrbnega in varnega poslovanja na osnovi te direktive in, kjer je to primerno, drugih direktiv, zlasti Direktive 2002/87/ES, in še posebej, kjer je to primerno, ali skupina, katere del bo postala, ima strukturo, ki omogoča izvajanje učinkovitega nadzora, učinkovito izmenjavo informacij in opredelitev nadzora med pristojnimi organi;
(d) whether the insurance undertaking will be able to comply and continue to comply with the prudential requirements based on this Directive and, where applicable, other Directives, notably, Directive 2002/87/EC, in particular, where applicable, whether the group of which it will become a part has a structure that makes it possible to exercise effective supervision, effectively exchange information and determine the supervision between the competent authorities;
Treba je zagotoviti, da bo predlagani pridobitelj sposoben izpolnjevati vse zahteve skrbnega in varnega poslovanja.
It needs to be ensured that the proposed acquirer will be able to meet all prudential requirements.
Poleg tega sta pri zapletenih strukturah zelo pomembna preglednost subjekta, ki je v postopku ustanavljanja, in njegov učinkovit nadzor.
Furthermore, in case of complex structures, a transparency of the entity to be established and its effective supervision are vital.
Člen 15 b, odstavek 2 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 b, paragraph 2 (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Pristojni organi lahko nasprotujejo predlagani pridobitvi samo, če ugotovijo, da merila iz odstavka 1 niso izpolnjena, ali če so informacije, ki jih predloži predlagani pridobitelj, nepopolne.
The competent authorities may oppose the proposed acquisition only if they find that the criteria set out in paragraph 1 are not met or if the information provided by the proposed acquirer is incomplete.
Pristojni organi lahko nasprotujejo predlagani pridobitvi samo, če imajo utemeljen razlog za to na podlagi meril iz odstavka 1 ali če so informacije, ki jih predloži predlagani pridobitelj, nepopolne.
The competent authorities may oppose the proposed acquisition only if there are reasonable grounds for so doing on the basis of the criteria set out in paragraph 1 or if the information provided by the proposed acquirer is incomplete.
Pristojni organ obvesti predlaganega pridobitelja najmanj 10 dni pred iztekom ocenjevalnega obdobja o tem, ali je prejete informacije ocenil kot nepopolne, in če je temu tako, katere dodatne smiselne in sorazmerne informacije potrebuje, da lahko dokonča pripravo ocene.
The competent authority shall in form the proposed acquirer at least 10 days before the end of the assessment period if it considers the information received to be incomplete and, if so, what further reasonable and proportionate information is required to complete the assessment.
Če predlagani pridobitelj v tem roku ne prejme takšne zahteve, se šteje, da so informacije, ki jih je posredoval, popolne.
If the proposed acquirer receives no such request by that date, the information provided shall be deemed to be complete.
Treba je poudariti naloge morebitnega pridobitelja, zlasti zagotavljanje vseh potrebnih informacij nadzorniku cilja, in naloge nadzornika, zlasti ocenjevanje morebitnega pridobitelja ob upoštevanju meril, določenih v tem predlogu.
It is important to stress the duty of potential acquirer, namely to provide the supervisor of the target with all necessary information and the duty of supervisor, namely to assess the potential acquirer in the light of the criteria laid down in this proposal.
Prav tako bo splošna zahteva za zagotavljanje razlogov v primeru negativne odločitve skupaj s pritožbo onemogočala kakršno koli samovoljno odločitev.
Furthermore, a general requirement to provide reasons in case of negative decision will, together with a right of appeal, prevent any arbitrary decision.
Nadzornik cilja pripravi primerno obrazložitev, ki omogoča razumevanje vsake negativne odločitve.
The supervisor of the target shall give an adequate explanation to allow understanding of any negative decision.
Člen 15 b, odstavek 4, pododstavek 2 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 b, paragraph 4, subparagraph 2 (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Obseg zahtevanih informacij mora biti sorazmeren in prilagojen vrsti predlagane pridobitve ali povečanja deleža.
The level of information required shall be proportionate and adapted to the nature of the proposed acquisition or increase of holding.
Obseg zahtevanih informacij mora biti sorazmeren in prilagojen naravi predlaganega pridobitelja ter vrsti predlagane pridobitve ali povečanja deleža.
The level of information required shall be proportionate and adapted to the nature of the proposed acquirer and to the proposed acquisition or increase of holding.
Države članice opredelijo seznam po načelu subsidiarnosti.
Following the principle of subsidiarity, Member States define the list.
Vsi seznami morajo biti primerljivi, sorazmerni in prilagojeni ne le naravi predlagane pridobitve ali povečanja deleža, temveč tudi naravi morebitnega pridobitelja, da se na notranjem trgu zagotovijo enaki pogoji.
To guarantee a level playing-field in the internal market, it is necessary that all lists have a comparable level and are proportionate and adapted not only to the nature of the proposed acquisition or increase of holding but also to the nature of the potential acquirer.
Člen 1, točka 3 Člen 15 b, odstavek 4, pododstavek 3 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 Article 15 b, paragraph 4, subparagraph 3 (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Države članice ne smejo zahtevati informacij , ki za oceno varnega in skrbnega poslovanja niso pomembne .
Member States shall not require information that is not relevant for a prudential assessment.
Države članice morajo zahtevati vse potrebne informacije , ki jim bodo omogočile preudarno oceno varnega in skrbnega poslovanja.
Member States shall require all the necessary information that will allow them to make a well-informed prudential assessment.
Pristojni organi morajo imeti na voljo vse podatke, potrebne za razsodno odločitev.
The competent authorities must be given all the necessary data on which to make a well-informed decision.
Člen 15 b, odstavek 4, pododstavek 3 a (novo) (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
Article 15 b, paragraph 4, subparagraph 3 a (new) (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Komisija najkasneje do + oceni, ali so seznami držav članic primerljivi, in po potrebi sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovi pristop na ravni Skupnosti.
The Commission shall, by + , assess whether Member States' lists are comparable and, if appropriate, shall take the necessary steps to provide a Community approach.
+ dve leti po roku za izvajanje te direktive.
+ two years after the deadline for implementing this Directive.
Vsi seznami morajo biti primerljivi, da se na notranjem trgu zagotovijo enaki pogoji.
To guarantee a level playing-field in the internal market, it is necessary that all lists have a comparable level.
Komisija lahko navsezadnje sprejme potrebne ukrepe, če ugotovi, da med seznami obstajajo bistvene razlike.
Thus, this has to be checked by the Commission, who could eventually take the necessary steps, if there are substantial differences among the lists.
Člen 1, točka 3 Člen 15 c, odstavek 1, uvodni del (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 Article 15 c, paragraph 1, introductory part (Directive 92/49/EEC)
Poleg členov 15(1) ter 15a in 15b in če ni drugače določeno, se ustrezni pristojni organi med seboj posvetujejo pri oceni pridobitve v skladu s členom 15b(1), če je predlagani pridobitelj:
In addition to Article 15(1) and Articles 15a and 15b and unless specified otherwise,
Ob upoštevanju direktive 1992/49/EGS o zavarovanju je treba izrecno navesti, da je potrebno dobro sodelovanje in učinkovito izmenjevanje informacij med vsemi vpletenimi nadzorniki.
In light of the insurance directive 1992/49/ECC it is important to state explicitly the need of good cooperation and swift exchange of information between all supervisors involved.
Pojasniti je treba tudi to, kateri nadzornik sprejema odločitve.
It also needs to be clarified which supervisor takes the decision.
Člen 1, točka 3 Člen 15 c, odstavek 2 (Direktiva 92/49/EGS)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 Article 15 c, paragraph 2 (Directive 92/49/EEC)