natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zakonodajni paket predstavlja regulativni okvir za kmetijsko panogo in najpomembnejši cilj naj bi bil zagotoviti jasnost glede regulativnega okvira na način, ki bo tistim, katerim je zakonodaja namenjena , takoj sporočal, da gre za poenostavitev.
This legislative package constitutes the regulatory framework for the agricultural industry and the overriding aim should be to create clarity around this regulatory framework in such a way that it is also perceived as a simplification by those for whom this legislation is designed.
Komisija je večkrat zagotovila, da gre samo za tehnične spremembe in da se na poenostavitev ne sme gledati kot na poskus spreminjanja temeljne politike.
The Commission has given repeated assurances that only technical changes are involved and that simplification must not be seen as an attempt to change underlying policy.
Komisija je predlagala ukinitev možnosti javne intervencije za svinjsko meso iz občudovanja vrednega razloga, da se sistem ni uporabljal tri desetletja, s čimer se je lotila spreminjanja politike.
Nevertheless, the Commission has proposed removing the option of public intervention for pigmeat on the admirable grounds that the scheme has not been used for three decades but, in so doing, the Commission is embarking on policy changes.
Poročevalec meni, da bi bilo treba intervencijsko shemo za svinjsko meso obdržati, tako da bi bile spremembe v tem predlogu izključno tehnične narave ter da bi se ohranilo zaupanje v izključno tehnične namene Komisije.
In order to confer maximum credibility on the Commission’s exclusively technical intentions, the rapporteur believes that the intervention scheme for pigmeat should be retained so that the changes in this proposal remain exclusively of a technical nature.
Ena temeljna uredba
A single basic regulation
Če se namerava vse sektorske uredbe združiti v eno temeljno uredbo, potem bi bilo smiselno, da se vse sektorske uredbe, ki se trenutno posodabljajo in ki so izključene iz tega predloga, vključijo v uredbo, ko bo njihovo posodabljanje zaključeno.
When all sectoral regulations are to be combined in one single basic regulation, it is a logical consequence that the sectoral regulations that are currently being reformed and that are excluded from this proposal should be incorporated once the reforms have been completed.
Zato se ne zdi potrebno predvidevati izidov in jih prezgodaj vključevati.
It ought therefore to be unnecessary to anticipate outcomes and incorporate parts of the reform prematurely.
Prenos pristojnosti s Sveta na Komisijo
Transferral of powers from the Council to the Commission
Komisija meni, da so nekatere določbe v obstoječih uredbah Sveta po svoji naravi tako tehnične, da se ne zdi primerno, da Svet ohrani regulativne pristojnosti.
The Commission proposes that certain provisions in the existing Council regulations are so technical in nature that it is not deemed appropriate for the Council to retain regulatory powers.
Zato predlaga prenos regulativnih pristojnosti na Komisijo, ki ji pomaga upravljalni odbor.
In respect of these provisions it is proposed that regulatory competence be transferred to the Commission assisted by a management committee.
To so tehnične določbe, ki se nanašajo na tehnične podrobnosti kot so pogodbeni pogoji, zahteve glede obveščanja in tajnosti podatkov v zvezi s sektorskimi sporazumi, seznami proizvodov za zasebno skladiščenje itd., ki jih je Svet lahko do sedaj sprejel brez posvetovanja z Evropskim parlamentom („druga generacija predpisov“).
These are technical provisions concerning such technical details as terms of contract, notification and disclosure requirements concerning sectoral agreements, listing of products subject to private storage, etc., which the Council has up to now been able to adopt without first consulting the European Parliament (‘second-generation acts’).
Ker so to samo določbe izključno tehnične narave, poročevalec meni, da je smiselno, da se regulativna pristojnost prenese na Komisijo, ki lahko hitro in učinkovito sprejema odločitve.
Insofar as these are solely provisions of a purely technical nature, the rapporteur feels it is reasonable to transfer regulatory competence to the Commission which can take decisions swiftly and effectively.
Vse politične določbe mora še nadalje v skladu s členom 37 Pogodbe sprejeti Svet po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
Any decision of a political nature must continue to be adopted in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 37 of the Treaty after consulting the European Parliament.
Ustanovitev enega upravljalnega odbora
Establishment of a single management committee
Komisija v skladu s predlagano poenostavitvijo nadalje predlaga samo en upravljalni odbor.
Following up the proposed simplification, the Commission further proposes that there should be only one management committee.
Po nedavni reformi skupne kmetijske politike bi bilo priporočljivo pri konsolidiranju obstoječih predpisov zmanjšati število upravljalnih odborov, vendar se pri zmanjšanju na samo en upravljalni odbor zastavlja vprašanje, kako je mogoče hkrati zagotoviti potrebno strokovno znanje o posameznih sektorjih.
By way of follow-up to the most recent reform of the common agricultural policy it seems sensible to cut the number of management committees when consolidating the existing set of rules, but cutting the number to one single management committee raises doubts as to how it is possible at the same time to ensure that the necessary sectoral expertise is available.
Komisija v predlogu ni v zadostni meri pojasnila, kako lahko en upravljalni odbor zagotovi potrebno strokovno znanje in deluje v praksi.
The Commission does not explain satisfactorily in the proposal how a single management committee can achieve the necessary sectoral expertise and operate in practice.
Delovanje tržnih mehanizmov znotraj posameznih sektorjev se precej razlikuje, zato bi morala biti ustanovljena vsaj dva upravljalna odbora, eden za proizvode živalskega izvora in drugi za proizvode rastlinskega izvora.
There is a major difference between the market mechanisms that apply within the various sectors and it must therefore be a minimum requirement to operate with at least two management committees divided up into a committee for animal products and one for vegetable products.
Tudi znotraj teh dveh glavnih področij obstajajo tako velike razlike, da bi bilo treba resno razmisliti o tem, ali morda ne bi bilo bolje, če bi delovala več kot dva upravljalna odbora.
Within these two main areas there is also such great variety that very serious thought ought to be given to whether there is a need to operate with more than just two management committees.
Nadalje je treba upravljalnima odboroma za proizvode živalskega oziroma rastlinskega izvora zagotoviti potrebno pomoč skupin strokovnjakov s tega področja iz držav članic in Komisije.
Furthermore, it should be ensured that the management committees are assisted by the necessary sectoral expertise from the Member States and the Commission.
Komisija naj bi v roku dveh let pripravila oceno v zvezi s tem vprašanjem, v skladu s katero bi bilo nato možno spremeniti število upravljalnih odborov in način njihove organizacije dela, če bi bilo to potrebno vsaj za zagotovitev potrebnega strokovnega znanja o posameznih sektorjih.
The Commission should produce an evaluation of this issue in two years’ time and it should then be possible to modify the number of management committees and the way their work is organised if this is deemed necessary, not least to ensure that the necessary sectoral expertise is available.
Skupna ureditev trgov v kmetijskem sektorju
Common organisation of agricultural markets
o vplivu in posledicah izključitve zdravstvenih storitev iz direktive o storitvah na notranjem trgu
on the impact and consequences of the exclusion of health services from the Directive on services in the internal market
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................16
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............16
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................22
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 22
– ob upoštevanju členov 16, 49, 50, 95(1) in 152 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 16, 49, 50, 95(1) and 152 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 35 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah;
– having regard to Article 35 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
– ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 28. aprila 1998 v zadevah C-120/95, Decker proti Caisse de maladie des employés privés
– having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 28 April 1998 in Cases C-120/95, Decker/Caisse de maladie des employés privés
I-1831. in C-158/96, Kohll proti Union des caisses de maladie
I-1831. and C‑158/96, Kohll/Union des caisses de maladie
I-1931. , z dne 12. julija 2001 v zadevah C-157/99, Geraets-Smits in Peerbooms
I-1931. , of 12 July 2001 in Cases C-157/99, Geraets-Smits and Peerbooms
I-5473. in C-368/98, Vanbraekel in drugi
I-5473. and C-368/98, Vanbraekel and others
I-5363. , z dne 25. februarja 2003 v zadevi C-326/00, IKA
I-5363. , of 25 February 2003 in Case C-326/00, IKA
I-1703. , z dne 13. maja 2003 v zadevi C-385/99, Müller-Fauré in Van Riet
I-1703. , of 13 May 2003 in Case C-385/99, Müller-Fauré and Van Riet
I-4509. , z dne 23. oktobra 2003 v zadevi C-56/01, Inizan
I-4509. , of 23 October 2003 in Case C-56/01, Inizan
I-12403. , z dne 18. marca 2004 v zadevi C-8/02, Leichtle
I-12403. , of 18 March 2004 in Case C-8/02, Leichtle
I-2641. , in z dne 16. maja 2005 v zadevi C-372/04, Watts
I-2641. , and of 16 May 2005 in Case C-372/04, Watts
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o storitvah na notranjem trgu
– having regard to Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market
36. in zlasti člena 2(2)(f) ter uvodnih izjav 22 in 23,
36. , in particular Article 2(2)(f), and recitals 22 and 23,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. septembra 2006 z naslovom "posvetovanje o ukrepih Skupnosti na področju zdravstvenih storitev" ( SEC(2006)1195 /4),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 26 September 2006 entitled ‘Consultation regarding Community action on health care services’ ( SEC(2006)1195 /4),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. marca 2007 o socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropski uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 9 June 2005 on patient mobility and healthcare developments in the European Union
UL C 124E, 25.5.2006, str.
OJ C 124E, 25.5.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o vrednotah in skupnih načelih zdravstvenih sistemov Evropske unije
– having regard to the Council Conclusions on common values and principles in European Union health systems
– ob upoštevanju člena 152(5) Pogodbe, ki vsebuje načelo subsidiarnosti na področju javnega zdravstva in ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1408/71 z dne 14. junija 1971 o uporabi sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe, samozaposlene in njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti
– having regard to Article 152(5) of the Treaty, enshrining the subsidiarity principle with regard to health care, and having regard to Council Regulation (EC) 1408/71 of 14 June 1971, on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community
UL L 149, 5.7.1971, str.
OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p.
2 , Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 883/2004 z dne 29. aprila 2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti
2. , European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 883/2004 on coordination of social security systems
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A6‑0173/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0173/2007 ),
A. ker so države članice odgovorne za organizacijo, izvajanje, upravljanje in financiranje zdravstvenih storitev, ki se razlikujejo po posameznih državah članicah,
A. whereas the Member States are responsible for organising, managing, delivering and financing health-care systems, which are different in every Member State,
B. ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti izdalo določeno število sodb, kot so o vprašanjih dostopa do zdravstvenega varstva, določanju meril za postopke predhodne odobritve ali povračilu stroškov, ki državljanom EU dovoljujejo, da prosto potujejo z namenom, da bodo našli zdravstveno oskrbo v drugi državi članici;
B. whereas the Court of Justice of the European Communities has handed down a number of judgments, such as on the issues of access to health care, the settlement of criteria for prior authorisation procedures or for reimbursement of costs, and authorising EU citizens to move freely in order to find health care in another Member State,
C. ker je Svet v svojih sklepih z dne 1. in 2. junija 2006 sprejel izjavo petindvajsetih ministrov za zdravje Evropske unije o skupnih vrednotah in načelih zdravstvenih sistemov Evropske Unije
C. whereas, in its conclusions of 1 to 2 June 2006, the Council adopted a statement by the 25 Health Ministers of the European Union about the common values and principles that underpin Europe’s health systems
UL C 146, 22.
OJ C 146, 22.6.2006, p.
13. opozarja, da morajo bolniki v vsakem primeru koristiti enakopraven dostop do ustreznega zdravljenja, ki je najbližje njihovemu domu in v njihovem jeziku; meni, da se mora Direktiva 89/105/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1988
Points out that the situation of legal uncertainty in which health services currently find themselves is unsatisfactory, and that Court of Justice decisions with regard to individual cases cannot suffice to formulate a policy on health services;
8. o preglednosti bolje uporabljati, tako da bodo zdravila hitreje dana na trg ter da se bodo podpirale inovacije in varnost zdravil ter da se bo bolj spodbujala uporaba centraliziranega postopka dajanja dovoljenja za promet;
8. on transparency should be better applied, so that medicines would be placed on the market more quickly, innovation and safety of medicines would be supported and use of the centralised procedure for marketing authorisation more strongly promoted;
Mobilnost bolnikov
Patient mobility
26. poudarja, da je treba razlikovati med čezmejnimi zdravstvenimi storitvami, tj. tistimi, ki so na obeh straneh skupne meje med dvema državama članicama, zato da ohranjajo in nudijo bolnikom visoko raven dostopa in zdravstvene oskrbe, ter mednarodnimi zdravstvenimi storitvami v Evropski uniji, ki lahko nudijo zdravljenje v primeru redkih bolezni ali »bolezni sirot«, ki zahtevajo uporabo redkih in zelo dragih tehnologij (referenčni zdravstveni centri) ali ki nudijo dostop do nege, ki je njihova država članica ali država stalnega prebivališča takrat ne more nuditi;
Stresses that it is desirable to distinguish between, on the one hand, cross-border health services, meaning those which are situated on either side of a border common to two Member States in order to maintain and offer patients a high standard of access and care, and, on the other hand, international health services within the European Union, which must offer health care for the treatment of rare or orphan diseases and/or diseases which require rare and very expensive technologies (care reference centres) or provide access to care which their Member State or State of residence cannot at present offer them;
29. ugotavlja, da znatno število bolnikov iz nekaterih držav članic ne more zaradi čakalnih dob v razumnem časovnem okviru prejemati potrebne zdravstvene oskrbe v lastni državi ter ugotavlja, da so zato ti bolniki odvisni od zdravstvene oskrbe v tujini;
Notes that considerable numbers of patients from several Member States are not able to receive the necessary medical treatment in their own country within a reasonable timeframe because of the waiting lists and notes that these patients are, therefore, dependent on medical treatment abroad;
Izboljšanje informacij za bolnike
Improving information for patients
Poudarja, da države članice že imajo listine bolnikovih pravic;
Points out that Member States already have charters of patients’ rights;
36. zahteva, naj Komisija glede povračila čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva vse države članice spodbuja k uporabi veljavnih postopkov; meni, da mora biti za Komisijo mogoče, da države kršiteljice sodno preganja;
Calls on the Commission to encourage all Member States to apply the existing procedures for reimbursement of cross-border health care; considers that it should be possible for the Commission to start proceedings against Member States that fail to do so;
Mobilnost zdravstvenih delavcev
Mobility of health professionals
41. ugotavlja, da čeprav v Evropi obstaja obojestransko priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij, pa še nimamo zadostnega poenotenja kakovosti vsebine strokovnega usposabljanja in načinov, na katere se poklici opravljajo in/ali nezadostne skrbi za takšno poenotenje;
Notes that, although mutual recognition of professional qualifications exists in Europe, there remains insufficient uniformity of quality of the content of professional training and of the ways in which professions are pursued and/or insufficient provision for such uniformity;
50. zato poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti pravno varnost bolnikov in zdravstvenih delavcev, zahteva pojasnitev odgovornosti, če bi bila povzročena škoda, ter obveznost vseh zdravstvenih delavcev, da imajo obvezno zavarovanje odgovornosti po razumni ceni;
Therefore stresses the need to guarantee the legal security of patients and professionals, calls for clarification of liabilities in the event of injury and an obligation for all health professionals to have compulsory third-party liability insurance at reasonable cost;
Sodelovanje med državami članicami
Cooperation between the Member States
57. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi tehnične standarde in poziva vlade držav članic, da dejavno podprejo uvedbo interoperabilnih preglednih informacijskih sistemov, ki bodo omogočili učinkovito izmenjavo in souporabo zdravstvenih podatkov med ponudniki zdravstvenih storitev v posameznih državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission to draw up technical standards, and calls on the governments of the Member States to actively support the introduction of interoperable transparent information systems allowing effective exchange and sharing of information on health between health-care providers in individual Member States,
67. spodbuja Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z zbiranjem podatkov držav članic in še naprej analizira trende in izzive, s katerimi se sooča čezmejna mobilnost bolnikov in zdravstvenih delavcev;
Encourages the Commission to continue collecting data from the Member States and to further analyse trends and challenges facing cross-border mobility of patients and health professionals;
Storitve zdravstvenega varstva in farmacevtske storitve so izključene iz direktive o storitvah na notranjem trgu zaradi njihovih posebnih značilnosti: po svoji naravi se ne morejo šteti za običajne tržne storitve.
Health-care services and pharmaceuticals were excluded from the directive on services in the internal market because of their very particular characteristics which prevent them from being considered as ordinary services that can be bought and sold.
Komisija je v odgovor na spodbudo Sveta in Parlamenta, da se zdravstvenemu sektorju nameni poseben razmislek, začela posvetovanje o okviru prihodnjih pobud.
In response to the encouragement of the Council and Parliament to devote a special reflection process to the health sector, the Commission launched a consultation process on the framework for future initiatives.
Zdravstvene storitve predstavljajo enega glavnih elementov evropskega socialnega modela, prispevajo h gospodarski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji Unije in lahko (ali pa tudi ne) vzbudijo zaupanje državljanov.
Health services are one of the fundamental elements of the European social model; they contribute to the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the EU and can inspire citizens’ confidence, or the reverse.
V tako občutljivem sektorju, ki zadeva človekovo najdragocenejšo dobrino in vpliva na vsakdanje življenje s končnim ciljem, da varuje življenje, je politični dejavnik zelo pomemben.
In such a sensitive sector which concerns people’s most precious possession and affects their daily lives with its ultimate aim of preserving life, there is a great deal at stake politically.
V skladu s Pogodbami in načelom subsidiarnosti so te storitve v pristojnosti držav članic, dejavnost EU, ki ureja in varuje posamezne oblike mobilnosti bolnikov in zdravstvenih delavcev (ki je trenutno še majhna, vendar se stalno povečuje), pa mora upoštevati vrednote in načela na evropski ravni: univerzalnost, varnost, kakovost, solidarnost ter enak dostop za vse na ozemlju Skupnosti.
In accordance with the Treaties and the principle of subsidiarity, these services fall within Member State competence, and EU action to regulate and safeguard various forms of mobility of patients and professionals, which currently is not a large phenomenon but is continually growing, must comply with shared values and principles at European level: universality, safety, quality, solidarity and equal access for all throughout the Community’s territory.
V tem oziru je dodana vrednost pomembna.
In this way, EU added value may be essential.
Zdravstvene storitve so znaten vir ustvarjanja številnih kvalificiranih delovnih mest, ki dejavno prispevajo k ciljem lizbonske strategije in imajo pomembno gospodarsko in socialno vlogo.
Health services are a substantial source for creating large numbers of skilled jobs, make an active contribution to the Lisbon strategy objectives, and their economic and social role is considerable.
Sistemi zdravstvenega varstva se med posameznimi državami močno razlikujejo, vendar se morajo prilagoditi in razvijati, da bodo ohranili visoko raven kakovosti in učinkovitosti.
Health systems differ widely from one country to another but must adapt and evolve to maintain high levels of quality and effectiveness.
Večja mobilnost zdravstvenih delavcev ne sme voditi k neravnotežju zdravstvene demografije v državah članicah.
Greater mobility of professionals should not lead to an imbalance in the medical demography in the Member States.
Zato je potrebna ureditev na evropski ravni in boljše sodelovanje med državami članicami za ohranjanje socialne in teritorialne kohezije ter zagotavljanje enakega dostopa do kakovostnega zdravstvenega varstva v vsej Evropi ob dobrem pokrivanju ozemlja, kot ga v členu 35 izrecno priznava Listina o temeljnih pravicah Unije.
Regulation at European level and improved cooperation between countries are therefore needed to preserve social and territorial cohesion and guarantee equal access to good quality health care throughout Europe through good territorial coverage, as Article 35 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union explicitly recognises.
Vedno večja mobilnost bolnikov in zdravstvenih delavcev ne sme voditi k vzpostavljanju notranjega trga zdravstvenih storitev, ki bi deloval na podlagi stroškovne konkurence, ki bi vodila k izenačevanju kakovosti zdravstvenega varstva navzdol in ustvarila zdravstveni sistem dveh hitrosti, ki bi ga koristili le premožnejši in bolje informirani bolniki.
The increasing mobility of patients and health professionals should not lead to the creation of an internal market in health services competing on the basis of cost, leading to a damaging levelling down of quality of care and creating a two-speed health system where only the more well-off and better informed patients would benefit.
V okviru mobilnosti bolnikov je pomembno, da imajo lahek dostop do jasnih in natančnih informacij brez birokratskih ovir.
In the context of patient mobility, it is essential that they have easy access to clear and precise information without bureaucratic obstacles.