natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Drugi del, ki se nanaša na truste, je namenjen zagotavljanju večje skladnosti s Haaško konvencijo iz leta 1985 o priznavanju trustov in o preprečevanju težav ali zmede, ki izhaja iz uporabe trustov v pristojnostih običajnega prava kot orodja za obravnavanje situacij, kot je denimo neupravičena obogatitev.
The second limb relating to trusts is designed to ensure greater consistency with the 1985 Hague Convention on recognition of trusts and to avoid difficulty or confusion arising from the employment of the trust in common-law jurisdictions as a device for dealing with situations such as unjust enrichment.
Člen 1, odstavek 2, točka (fa) (novo)
Article 1, paragraph 2, point (f a) (new)
(fa) dokaz in postopek brez poseganja v člena 16 in 17.
fa ) evidence and procedure, without prejudice to Articles 16 and 17.
Člen 1, odstavek 2, točka (fb) (novo)
Article 1, paragraph 2, point (f b) (new)
(fb) odgovornost za dejanja javne uprave, vključno z odgovornostjo javno imenovanih nosilcev funkcij.
fb ) liability for acts of public authority, including liability of publicly appointed office-holders.
Predlog spremembe 24
Amendment 24
Ta uredba ne posega v uporabo ali uvedbo aktov institucij Evropskih skupnosti, ki:
This Regulation shall not prejudice the application or adoption of acts of the institutions of the European Communities which:
(a) v razmerju do določenih zadev določajo pravila glede izbire prava pri nepogodbenih obveznostih; ali
(a) in relation to particular matters, lay down choice-of-law rules relating to non-contractual obligations; or
(b) določajo pravila, ki se uporabljajo ne glede na to, ali zadevno nepogodbeno obveznost ureja nacionalno pravo na podlagi te uredbe; ali
(b) lay down rules which apply irrespective of the national law governing the non-contractual obligation in question by virtue of this Regulation; or
(c) preprečujejo uporabo določbe ali določb pristojnega sodišča ali prava, ki ga določa ta uredba; ali
(c) prevent application of a provision or provisions of the law of the forum or of the law designated by this Regulation; or
(d) določajo predpise, ki so namenjeni prispevanju k pravilnemu delovanju notranjega trga, če jih ni mogoče uporabiti v zvezi s pravom, ki ga določajo pravila zasebnega mednarodnega prava.
(d) lay down provisions designed to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market in so far as they cannot be applied in conjunction with the law designated by the rules of private international law.
Bolje je obravnavati vsebinsko področje Uredbe v enem členu, ki jasno razmejuje, kje pravo Skupnosti nadomešča pravila zasebnega mednarodnega prava.
It is better to deal with the substantive scope of the Regulation in a single article, clearly delimiting where Community law displaces the rules of private international law.
Nova alinea (d) ima namen pokriti obstoječe instrumente notranjega trga, npr. televizijo brez meja in direktive o e-poslovanju.
The new indent (d) is intended to cover existing Internal Market instruments such as the television without frontiers and the e-commerce directives.
Predlog spremembe 25
Amendment 25
Poglavje II, oddelek I, člen 2 a (novo)
Chapter II, Section 1, Article 2 a (new)
Svoboda izbire
Freedom of choice
Stranki se lahko dogovorita s sporazumom, ki sta ga sklenili po nastanku spora, ali če je že prej obstajalo čisto poslovno razmerje med trgovci z isto pogajalsko močjo, s sporazumom, o katerem sta se prosto pogodili pred nastankom spora, glede predložitve nepogodbenih obveznosti pravu po njuni izbiri.
The parties may agree, by an agreement entered into after their dispute arose or, where there is a pre-existing arms-length commercial relationship between traders of equal bargaining power, by an agreement freely negotiated before the dispute arose, to submit non-contractual obligations to the law of their choice.
Izbiro je treba izraziti ali pokazati z razumljivo gotovostjo glede okoliščin primera.
The choice must be expressed or demonstrated with reasonable certainty by the circumstances of the case.
Ne vpliva na pravice in obveznosti tretjih oseb in ne posega v uporabo obveznih pravil v okviru pomena člena 12.
It may not affect the rights and obligations of third parties and shall be without prejudice to the application of mandatory rules within the meaning of Article 12.
Pravo, ki ga izbereta stranki, ne prikrajšajo delavca, ki je podpisnik pogodbe o zaposlitvi, zaščite, ki bi mu jo zagotovila obvezna pravila:
A choice of law made by the parties shall not deprive an employee who is a party to a contract of employment of the protection that would be afforded to him by the mandatory rules
(a) države, v kateri običajno opravlja svoje delo pri izvajanju pogodbe; ali
(a) of the country in which he habitually carries out his employment in performance of the contract; or
(b) če delavec ne opravlja svojega dela v kateri od držav, v skladu s pravom države, v kateri je kraj poslovanja, prek katerega je bil zaposlen; ali
(b) if the employee does not carry out his work in any one country, of the law of the country in which the place of business through which he was engaged is situated; or
(c) države, s katero je pogodba najtesneje povezana.
(c) of the country with which the contract is most closely connected.
Če so vsi drugi elementi situacije ob času izgube ali škode v eni ali več državah članicah, ne sme izbira strank glede veljavnega prava preprečevati uporabe določb prava Skupnosti.
If all the other elements of the situation at the time when the loss or damage is sustained are located in one or more of the Member States, the parties' choice of the applicable law shall not debar the application of provisions of Community law.
Zdi se bolj logično, da se prejšnji člen 10 premakne na začetek uredbe, saj je jasno, da je treba v primeru, da sta stranki dosegli medsebojni sporazum glede veljavnega prava, pred uporabljanjem zunanjih pravil upoštevati namen strank, da bi lahko določili veljavno pravo.
It seems more logical to move the former Article 10 to the beginning of the Regulation, since it is clear that if the parties have reached an agreement between them as to the applicable law, account should be taken of the parties' intention before applying exogenous rules in order to determine the applicable law.
To tudi spodbuja sodno gospodarstvo.
This also promotes judicial economy.
Prav tako ni videti razloga, zakaj se stranki v čistem poslovnem razmerju ne bi mogli dogovoriti za pravo, ki velja za katero koli zahtevo v odškodninski odgovornosti/deliktom preden nastane kakršen koli tak zahtevek.
In addition, there seems to be no reason why parties in an arms-length commercial relationship should not be able to agree on the law applicable to any claim in tort/delict before any such claim arises.
To je ustrezno za podjetja, ki želijo urejati vse možne vidike svojih razmerij od začetka.
This may be convenient to businesses wishing to regulate all potential aspects of their relationship from the outset.
Vseeno, besedilo tega predloga spremembe je oblikovano tako, da izključuje potrošniške pogodbe in sporazume, ki niso bili prosto sklenjeni (kot so pogodbe v standardnih oblikah – pogodbe o pristopu (contrats d'adhésion)), kjer pogodbeni stranki nimata enake pogajalske moči (npr. pogodbe o zavarovanju, franšizne in licenčne pogodbe).
However, the wording of this amendment is designed to exclude consumer contracts and agreements not freely negotiated (such as standard-form contracts - contrats d'adhésion) where the contracting parties do not have equal bargaining power (e.g. insurance, franchise and licensing contracts).
Zdi se tudi, da ni razloga, zakaj ne bi takšnih sporazumov sklepali v zvezi z intelektualno lastnino.
There also seems to be no reason why such agreements cannot be concluded in relation to intellectual property.
Nove določbe v zvezi s pogodbami o zaposlitvi in potrošniškimi pogodbami izražajo položaj v skladu z Rimsko konvencijo o pogodbenih obveznostih.
The new provisions relating to contracts of employment and consumer contracts reflect the position under the Rome Convention on contractual obligations.
Določeno pravo, ki velja za nepogodbene obveznosti, je pravo države, v kateri škoda nastane ali obstaja verjetnost, da bo nastala , ne glede na državo, v kateri se je zgodil dogodek, ki je povzročil nastalo škodo, in ne glede na državo ali države, v katerih so nastale posredne posledice dogodka.
The law applicable to a non-contractual obligation shall be the law of the country in which the damage arises or is likely to arise , irrespective of the country in which the event giving rise to the damage occurred and irrespective of the country or countries in which the indirect consequences of that event arise.
Če ni sporazuma v smislu člena 2a in če v tej uredbi ni drugače določeno, je določeno pravo, ki velja za nepogodbene obveznosti , ki izvirajo iz odškodninske odgovornosti ali delikta , pravo države, v kateri škoda nastopi ali obstaja verjetnost, da bo nastopila , ne glede na državo, v kateri se je zgodil dogodek, ki je povzročil nastalo škodo, in ne glede na državo ali države, v katerih so nastale posredne posledice dogodka.
In the absence of an agreement within the meaning of Article 2a and unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation, the law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of a tort or a delict shall be the law of the country in which the damage occurs or is likely to occur , irrespective of the country in which the event giving rise to the damage occurred and irrespective of the country or countries in which the indirect consequences of that event arise.
Vendar pa se v primeru, da imata tako odgovorna oseba kot oseba, ki je utrpela škodo, običajno prebivališče v isti državi, v kateri je nastala škoda, nepogodbena obveznost ureja s pravom tiste države.
However, where the person claimed to be liable and the person sustaining damage both have their habitual residence in the same country when the damage occurs, the non-contractual obligation shall be governed by the law of that country.
V primeru telesnih poškodb, ki so posledica prometnih nezgod, pa morata sodišče, kjer teče postopek, in zavarovalnica odgovornega voznika v smislu direktive o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti glede vrste odškodninskega zahtevka in izračuna višine zahtevka uporabiti predpise, ki veljajo na kraju običajnega prebivališča posamezne žrtve, razen če bi bilo to nepravično do žrtve.
In the case of personal injuries arising out of traffic accidents, however, and with a view to the motor insurance directive, the court seised and the liable driver's insurer should, for the purposes of determining the type of claim for damages and calculating the quantum of the claim, apply the rules of the individual victim's place of habitual residence unless it would be inequitable to the victim to do so.
V zvezi z odgovornostjo se uporablja pravo kraja, kjer se je nezgoda pripetila.
With regard to liability, the applicable law shall be the law of the place where the accident occurred.
Ne glede na odstavka 1 in 2 , kjer je razvidno iz vseh okoliščin primera, da je nepogodbena obveznost očitno tesneje povezana z drugo državo, se uporablja pravo druge države.
Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2 , where it is clear from all the circumstances of the case that the non-contractual obligation is manifestly more closely connected with another country, the law of that other country shall apply.
Očitno tesnejša povezava z drugo državo lahko temelji zlasti na že prej obstoječem razmerju med strankama, kot denimo na pogodbi, ki je tesno povezana z zadevno nepogodbeno obveznostjo.
A manifestly closer connection with another country may be based in particular on a pre-existing relationship between the parties, such as a contract that is closely connected with the non-contractual obligation in question.
Ne glede na odstavek 1 in izjemoma , kjer je razvidno iz vseh okoliščin primera, da je nepogodbena obveznost očitno tesneje povezana z drugo državo, se uporablja pravo druge države.
Notwithstanding paragraph 1 and by way of exception , where it is clear from all the circumstances of the case that the non-contractual obligation is manifestly more closely connected with another country, the law of that other country shall apply.
Dejavniki, ki se jih lahko upošteva kot očitno povezavo med nepogodbeno obveznostjo z drugo državo, vključujejo:
The factors that may be taken into account as manifestly connecting a non-contractual obligation with another country include:
(a) v zvezi s porazdelitvijo izgub in pravno sposobnostjo, dejstvo, da imata odgovorna oseba(e) in oseba(e), ki je(so) utrpela(e) izgubo ali škodo svoje običajno prebivališče v isti državi, da sta ustrezni zakonodaji države običajnega bivališča odgovorne osebe(-) in države stalnega prebivališča osebe(-), ki je(so) utrpela(e) izgubo ali škodo, enaki;
(a) as far as loss-distribution and legal capacity are concerned, the fact that the person(s) claimed to be liable and the person(s) sustaining loss or damage have their habitual residence in the same country or that the relevant laws of the country of habitual residence of the person(s) claimed to be liable and of the country of residence of the person(s) sustaining loss or damage are substantially identical;
(b) že obstoječe pravno ali dejansko razmerje med strankama, kot denimo pogodba, ki je tesno povezana z zadevno nepogodbeno obveznostjo;
(b) a pre-existing legal or de facto relationship between the parties, such as, for example, a contract, that is closely connected with the non-contractual obligation in question;
(c) potrebo po gotovosti, predvidljivosti in enotnosti rezultata;
(c) the need for certainty, predictability and uniformity of result;
(d) zaščito zakonitih pričakovanj;
(d) protection of legitimate expectations;
(e) politike, ki so osnova tujega prava, ki ga je treba uporabiti, in posledice uporabe tega prava.
(e) the policies underlying the foreign law to be applied and the consequences of applying that law.
Pri reševanju vprašanja veljavnega prava sodišče, ki začne postopek, kjer je to potrebno, opravi za vsako posebno vprašanje spora ločeno analizo.
In resolving the question of the applicable law, the court seised shall, where necessary, subject each specific issue of the dispute to separate analysis.
Odgovornost za izdelke
Product liability
Šteje se, da je odgovornost za izdelke z napako obravnavana v spremenjenem členu 3.
It is considered that liability for defective products can be dealt with under Article 3, as amended.
Predlog spremembe 28
Amendment 28
Odstavek 1A, naslov (novo)
Section 1A, Title (new)
ODDELEK 1A
SECTION 1A
POSEBNA PRAVILA, VELJAVNA ZA POSEBNO ODŠKODNINSKO ODGOVORNOST/DELIKTE IN ZA NEPOGODBENE OBVEZNOSTI
SPECIAL RULES APPLICABLE TO SPECIFIC TORTS/DELICTS AND NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Nelojalna konkurenca
Unfair competition
Pravo, ki velja za nepogodbene obveznosti, ki izvirajo iz dejanja nelojalne konkurence, je pravo države, kjer so razmerja konkurence ali skupni interesi potrošnikov neposredno in bistveno kršeni ali kjer ta nevarnost obstaja.
The law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of an act of unfair competition shall be the law of the country where competitive relations or the collective interests of consumers are or are likely to be directly and substantially affected.
Kjer dejanje nelojalne konkurence vpliva izključno na interese določenega konkurenta, se upošteva člen 3(2) in (3).
Where an act of unfair competition affects exclusively the interests of a specific competitor, Article 3(2) and (3) shall apply.
Šteje se, da je nelojalna konkurenca obravnavana v spremenjenem členu 3.
It is considered that unfair competition can be dealt with under Article 3, as amended.
Ob nejasnosti glede tega, kaj zajemajo „dejanja nelojalne konkurence”, predlaga poročevalka, da se ta določba raje izbriše.
Moreover, in the absence of clarity as to what is covered by "acts of unfair competition", the rapporteur considers that this provision is best omitted.
Če se sprejme odločitev, da „dejanja nelojalne konkurence” izrecno zajema uredba, predlaga poročevalka, da se taka dejanja določijo s klavzulo z definicijo.
If, ultimately, it is decided that "acts of unfair competition" should be expressly catered for in this Regulation, the rapporteur considers that such acts should be defined in a definition clause.
Predlog spremembe 30
Amendment 30
Pravo, ki velja za nepogodbene obveznosti, ki izvirajo iz kršitev zasebnosti ali pravic, ki se nanašajo na osebnost , je pravo sodišča, kjer je uporaba prava, ki jo določa člen 3, v nasprotju s temeljnimi načeli sodišča, kar zadeva svobodo izražanja in podatkov.
The law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of a violation of privacy or rights relating to the personality shall be the law of the forum where the application of the law designated by Article 3 would be contrary to the fundamental principles of the forum as regards freedom of expression and information.
Kar zadeva pravo, ki velja za nepogodbene obveznosti, ki izvirajo iz kršitve zasebnosti ali pravic, ki se nanašajo na zasebnost, se uporablja pravo države, v kateri se je pojavil najbolj značilen element ali elementi izgube ali škode ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bodo pojavili, vendar pa lahko obstaja očitno tesnejša povezava z določeno državo glede na dejavnike, kot npr. država, na katero je publikacija ali oddaja v prvi vrsti naslovljena, ali jezik publikacije ali oddaje ali prodaje ali velikosti občinstva v dani državi kot delež skupne prodaje ali velikosti občinstva ali glede kombinacije teh dejavnikov.
As regards the law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of a violation of privacy or rights relating to the personality , the law of the country in which the most significant element or elements of the loss or damage occur or are likely to occur shall be applicable, but a manifestly closer connection with a particular country may be deemed to exist having regard to factors such as the country to which a publication or broadcast is principally directed or the language of the publication or broadcast or sales or audience size in a given country as a proportion of total sales or audience size or a combination of these factors.
Ta določba se smiselno uporablja za publikacije v internetu.
This provision shall apply mutatis mutandis to Internet publication.
Pravo, ki velja za pravico do odgovora ali podobne ukrepe, je pravo države, v kateri ima oddajnik ali založnik svoje običajno prebivališče.
The law applicable to the right of reply or equivalent measures shall be the law of the country in which the broadcaster or publisher has its habitual residence.
Pravo, ki velja za pravico do odgovora ali podobne ukrepe in za katere koli preventivne ukrepe ali prohibitivne odredbe proti oddajniku ali založniku glede vsebine publikacije ali oddajanj, je pravo države, v kateri ima oddajnik ali založnik svoje običajno prebivališče.
The law applicable to the right of reply or equivalent measures and to any preventive measures or prohibitory injunctions against a publisher or broadcaster regarding the content of a publication or broadcast shall be the law of the country in which the publisher or broadcaster has its habitual residence.
Odstavek 2 velja tudi za kršitev zasebnosti ali pravic, ki se nanašajo na osebnost, ki je posledica obravnavanja osebnih podatkov.
Paragraph 2 shall also apply to a violation of privacy or of rights relating to the personality resulting from the handling of personal data.
The amendment to the second paragraph relating to injunctive relief is more realistic, given t hat such relief has to be sought and granted swiftly and is interim in nature
The amendment to the second paragraph relating to injunctive relief is more realistic, given that such relief has to be sought and granted swiftly and is interim in nature
Člen 6a (novo)
Article 6a (new)
Industrijska dejavnost
Industrial action
Pravo, ki velja za nepogodbene obveznosti, ki izvirajo iz industrijske dejavnosti, ki se začenja izvajati ali se že izvaja, je pravo države, v kateri se bo dejavnost začela izvajati ali se izvaja .
The law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of industrial action, pending or carried out, shall be the law of the country in which the action is to be taken or has been taken.
Prometne nesreče
Traffic accidents
Dokler Skupnost ne bo sprejela podrobnejše zakonodaje o veljavnem pravu o prometnih nesrečah, države članice uporabljajo splošna pravila, določena v tej uredbi v členu 13, ali Haaška konvencija z dne 4. maja 1971 o veljavnem pravu o prometnih nesrečah.
Until such time as the Community adopts detailed legislation on the law applicable to traffic accidents, Member States shall either apply the general rules set out in this Regulation, subject to Article 13, or the Hague Convention of 4 May 1971 on the Law Applicable to Traffic Accidents.
V primeru telesnih poškodb, ki izhajajo iz prometnih nesreč, mora sodišče, ki začne postopek, uporabljati pravila v zvezi z višino škode na kraju običajnega prebivališča posamezne žrtve, razen če bi bilo to nepravično.
In the case of personal injuries arising out of traffic accidents the court seised should apply the rules relating to the quantum of damages of the individual victim's place of habitual residence, unless it would be inequitable to do so.
Predlog spremembe 33
Amendment 33
Škodovanje okolju
Violation of the environment
Pravo, ki velja za nepogodbene obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz škodovanja okolju, je pravo, ki je določeno z uporabo člena 3(1), razen če oseba, ki je utrpela škodo, vztraja na tem, da njen zahtevek temelji na pravu države, v kateri je škodni dogodek nastal.
The law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of a violation of the environment shall be the law determined by the application of Article 3(1), unless the person sustaining damage prefers to base his claim on the law of the country in which the event giving rise to the damage occurred.
Šteje se, da je škodovanje okolju obravnavano v spremenjenem členu 3.
It is considered that violations of the environment can be dealt with under Article 3, as amended.
Razen tega ob odsotnosti definicije izraza „škodovanje okolju“ poročevalka ne želi podati nobenega izrazitega mnenja
Moreover, in the absence of any definition of what is meant by "violations of the environment", the rapporteur prefers to make no express mention of such.
Predlog spremembe 34
Amendment 34
Oddelek 2, Naslov
Section 2, Title
ODDELEK 2
SECTION 2
PRAVILA ZA NEPOGODBENE OBVEZNOSTI IZ DRUGAČNEGA DEJANJA, KOT JE ODŠKODNINSKA ODGOVORNOST ALI PREKRŠEK
RULES APPLICABLE TO NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF AN ACT OTHER THAN A TORT OR A DELICT
Ta naslov je zdaj odvečen.
This title is now redundant.
Določanje veljavnega prava
Determination of the applicable law
Če nepogodbena obveznost, ki izvira iz drugačnega dejanja, kot je odškodninska odgovornost ali prekršek, zadeva razmerje, ki je med strankama že prej obstajalo, npr. pogodbo, ki je tesno povezana z nepogodbeno obveznostjo, se jo ureja s pravom, ki ureja to razmerje.
If a non-contractual obligation arising out of an act other than a tort or delict concerns a relationship previously existing between the parties, such as a contract closely connected with the non-contractual obligation, it shall be governed by the law that governs that relationship.
Brez poseganja v odstavek 1, v primeru da imata stranki svoje običajno prebivališče v isti državi, v kateri je nastal škodni dogodek, velja za urejanje nepogodbene obveznosti pravo navedene države.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, where the parties have their habitual residence in the same country when the event giving rise to the damage occurs, the law applicable to the non-contractual obligation shall be the law of that country.
Brez poseganja v odstavka 1 in 2 se nepogodbena obveznost, ki izhaja iz neupravičene obogatitve, ureja s pravom tiste države, v kateri je prišlo do obogatitve.
Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 and 2, a non-contractual obligation arising out of unjust enrichment shall be governed by the law of the country in which the enrichment takes place.