natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija je 3. marca 2004 v okviru tako imenovanega tretjega železniškega paketa predstavila predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 91/440 o razvoju železnic Skupnosti (KOM(2004)139).
On 3 March 2004, under what is known as the third railway package, the Commission presented the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways (COM(2004) 139).
Glavne značilnosti predloga, ki nadgrajuje tako prvi kot drugi železniški paket, so:
The key features of the proposal, building on the first and second railway packages, were as follows:
Notranja železniška omrežja držav članic naj se bi za mednarodni potniški promet odprla do 1. januarja 2010, tako da bi jih brez razlik lahko uporabljali vsi prevozniki v železniškem prometu.
The Member States' national rail networks were to be opened up by 1 January 2010 for non-discriminatory use by all railway undertakings providing international passenger services.
Pri tem bi morali imeti prevozniki v železniškem prometu pravico pobiranja in odlaganja potnikov na vseh postajah na mednarodni progi, tudi med dvema postajama v isti državi članici (kabotaža).
In that connection, railway undertakings were to be permitted to pick up and set down passengers at all stations on the international route, including conveying them between two stations in the same Member State (cabotage).
Odpiranje omrežja bi se moralo dati omejiti v primeru, da bi ogrozilo ekonomsko ravnotežje prevozne storitve, določeno z javno pogodbo.
It was to be possible to limit the opening-up of networks if this would jeopardise the economic equilibrium of a passenger service laid down in a public service contract.
Prva obravnava Parlamenta
Parliament's first reading
Evropski parlament je 28. septembra 2005 oblikoval svoje stališče v prvi obravnavi.
On 28 September 2005 the European Parliament adopted its opinion at first reading.
Sprejel je naslednje bistvene spremembe predloga Komisije:
In doing so it made the following major changes to the Commission proposal:
Parlament je že med zakonodajnim postopkom o drugem železniškem paketu s prepričljivo večino podprl odpiranje železniških omrežij tako za mednarodni kot notranji potniški promet, in sicer do 1. januarja 2008.
In the legislative procedure concerning the second railway package Parliament had already called, by an overwhelming majority, for rail networks to be opened up not only for international but also for domestic passenger services, both by 1 January 2008.
Na osnovi tega je predlagal postopni pristop, v skladu s katerim naj bi se omrežja do 1. januarja 2008 odprla za mednarodni potniški promet in do 1. januarja 2012 za vse ostale vrste potniških storitev.
Building on that position, Parliament now proposed a phased approach, whereby international passenger services would be opened up by 1 January 2008 and all other types of passenger service by 1 January 2012.
Podprl je možnost, da se odpiranje omrežij omeji z namenom zaščite javnih regionalnih in lokalnih železniških storitev, kot je predlagala Komisija, vendar jo je, zlasti v zvezi s pristojnostjo za sprejemanje odločitev o tem, natančneje opredelil in povezal z merilom ekonomske vzdržnosti javne storitve.
The possibility, envisaged by the Commission, of limiting the opening-up of networks to protect regional and local rail services covered by public service contracts was endorsed, but – particularly with regard to the power to take such decisions – was worded more tightly and linked to the criterion of economic viability of the public service.
Parlament je predlagal tudi spremembo Direktive 2001/14/ES o dodeljevanju železniških infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti.
Parliament also proposed modifying Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity, as well.
Da bi prevoznikom v železniškem prometu omogočili lažje vzpostavljanje specializiranih struktur, kot so hitre povezave, naj bi se okvirne pogodbe za tovrstne potniške storitve lahko sklenile za obdobje do deset let.
In order to make it easier for railway undertakings to create specialised infrastructure such as high-speed lines, it was to be possible for framework agreements for such passenger services to be concluded for up to 10 years.
Poleg tega je Parlament Svet pozval k oblikovanju skupnega stališča o reviziji Uredbe (EGS) št. 1191/69 o ukrepanju držav članic glede obveznosti javne službe v železniškem in cestnem prometu ter prometu po celinskih plovnih poteh tudi zato, da bi na novo in natančneje določili možnost omejitve dostopa do omrežja.
Additionally, Parliament called on the Council finally to adopt a common position on the revision of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway, not least so as to define afresh, and more precisely, the possibility of limiting network access.
Skupno stališče Sveta
The Council's common position
Svet je svoje skupno stališče Evropskemu parlamentu poslal 18. septembra 2006.
On 18 September 2006 the Council forwarded its common position to the European Parliament.
Njegova različica besedila direktive se od različice Parlamenta bistveno razlikuje v naslednjih točkah:
Its drafting of the text of the directive essentially diverges from Parliament's version where the following points are concerned:
Svet zavrača odpiranje železniških omrežij za notranji potniški promet in predlaga, da se omrežja za mednarodni potniški promet odprejo šele 1. januarja 2010.
The Council rejects the opening-up of rail networks for national passenger services and proposes that networks not be opened up for international passenger services until 1 January 2010.
Za države članice, v katerih delež mednarodnega prevoza potnikov z vlakom predstavlja več kot polovico realizacije potniškega prometa prevoznikov v železniškem prometu, bi se morala omrežja odpreti s 1. januarjem 2012.
For Member States where international passenger services account for more than half of the railway undertakings' passenger turnover, the networks do not have to be opened up until 1 January 2012.
Svet želi odpiranje omrežij omejiti z uvedbo novega merila o „glavnem namenu storitve“, kar pomeni, da bi se omrežja odprla le za tiste storitve mednarodnega prometa, pri katerih je pravica pobiranja in odlaganja potnikov med postajami v različnih državah članicah opredeljena kot njihov „glavni namen“.
The Council continues to seek to limit the opening-up of networks by means of the new criterion of 'principal purpose', whereby it wants only to open up networks for those international services in respect of which the carriage of passengers between stations in different Member States has been recognised as their so-called 'principal purpose'.
Odpiranje omrežja želi omejiti tudi z dajanjem možnosti državam članicam, da odpiranje omrežja zavrnejo ali omejijo do 15 let zaradi sklenjenih koncesijskih pogodb.
The Council also wants to limit the opening-up of networks by giving the Member States the possibility of refusing to open them up, or restricting such opening-up, for up to 15 years on the grounds of concession contracts.
Navsezadnje želi Svet odpiranje omrežja omejiti z novo dajatvijo v korist državnega financiranja javnih regionalnih in lokalnih potniških storitev, pri čemer naj bi dajatev veljala za vse storitve potniškega prometa.
Finally, the Council wants to place economic restrictions on the opening-up of networks by means of a new levy to benefit State funding of public regional and local passenger services; this levy is to apply across the board to all passenger services.
Svet je v zvezi z možnostjo, da se odpiranje omrežja omeji v korist javnih regionalnih in lokalnih potniških storitev, predstavil zelo obsežen postopek in kot merilo zopet navedel ekonomsko ravnotežje pogodb o javnih storitvah.
Where the possibility of limiting the opening-up of networks to protect regional and local passenger services covered by public service contracts is concerned, the Council lays down a very comprehensive procedure and once again cites the criterion of the economic equilibrium of the public service contract.
Z manjšimi spremembami je prevzel določbo o vzajemnosti, ki jo je uvedel Parlament.
The Council has taken over the reciprocity clause introduced by Parliament, with some drafting changes.
Predstavil je nov predlog, v skladu s katerim lahko države članice tranzitne železniške storitve preko Skupnosti izključijo s področja uporabe te direktive.
The Council introduces a new proposal whereby the Member States may exclude railway services carried out in transit through the Community from the scope of the directive.
Prav tako na novo predlaga, da se obveznost prenosa direktive ne uporablja za Malto in Ciper, dokler državi ne vzpostavita železniškega sistema.
The Council also proposes, as a new provision, that Malta and Cyprus be exempted from the obligation to transpose the directive as long as neither has a railway system.
Sprejel je tudi manjše spremembe o zahtevi glede poročanja.
The Council has also made minor changes with regard to reporting requirements.
Nazadnje je Svet prevzel predlog Parlamenta o spremembi Direktive 2001/14/ES o dodeljevanju železniških infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti, vendar je podaljšal obdobje trajanja okvirnih pogodb za specializirano infrastrukturo do 15 let in sprejel več drugih postopkovnih sprememb.
Finally, the Council has taken over Parliament's proposal to modify Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity, as well, but has extended the term of framework agreements covering specialised infrastructure to up to 15 years and has also made other, more procedural amendments.
Predlogi odbora
The Committee's proposals
Odbor se s svojimi predlogi sprememb opira predvsem na stališča Parlamenta iz prve obravnave z 28. septembra 2005.
The Committee’s amendments are largely based on Parliament's position of 28 September 2005 at first reading.
Odbor zastopa stališče, ki ga je Parlament s prepričljivo večino zavzel že v zakonodajnem postopku o drugem železniškem paketu (glej mnenje s 23. oktobra 2003) in v skladu s katerim bi se morala notranja železniška omrežja odpreti za vse storitve potniškega prometa.
As previously decided by Parliament, by an overwhelming majority, in the legislative procedure concerning the second railway package (see Parliament's opinion of 23 October 2003), the Committee maintains its view that national rail networks should be opened up for all passenger services.
Ker je treba zakonodajni okvir za železnice prenesti v nacionalne zakonodaje do konca leta 2006, je odprtje omrežij za mednarodni potniški promet do 1. januarja 2010 ne le smiselno, temveč tudi povsem mogoče.
Since the legal framework for railways must be transposed by the end of 2006, it not only makes sense to open up networks for international passenger services by 1 January 2010, but is also entirely feasible to do so.
Odbor je pri tem upošteval pomisleke Sveta glede z njegovega stališča prehitrega odpiranja omrežij za notranji potniški promet, zato predlaga, da se odprtje trga za vse ostale vrste storitev potniškega prometa preloži na 1. januar 2017.
To make concessions to the Council, which is still expressing reservations about what it regards as opening up national passenger services too hastily, the Committee proposes postponing the opening-up of all other types of passenger service further, until 1 January 2017.
V desetih letih od danes bi vsekakor moralo biti mogoče dokončno vzpostaviti načela evropskega notranjega trga tudi v železniškem sektorju, predlagano zakonodajo pa uporabiti tako, da četrti železniški paket ne bi bil več potreben.
Ten years from now it ought in any case to be possible to complete the implementation of the principle of the European single market in the railway sector, too, and use this legislation to make a fourth railway package superfluous.
Glej predlog spremembe 16 kot tudi predloge sprememb 1, 4, 5 in 28.
See Amendment 16 and also Amendments 1, 4, 5, and 28.
Odbor predlaga sprejetje kasnejšega datuma (dve leti kasneje) za odpiranje omrežij v državah članicah, v katerih bi mednarodni potniški promet lahko močno vplival na notranji potniški promet.
The Committee proposes accepting a later date (two years later) for opening up networks in those Member States where international passenger services could have a major impact on national passenger services.
Glej odstavek 2 predloga spremembe 16.
See paragraph 2 of Amendment 16.
Glede možnosti, da se odpiranje omrežij v skladu z novim odstavkom 3b člena 10 omeji v korist javnih regionalnih in lokalnih potniških storitev, odbor priporoča sprejetje zelo obsežnega predloga Sveta z manjšimi spremembami in ponovno uvedbo merila o zanesljivosti javnih pogodb, ki ga je predlagal Parlament.
With regard to the possibility of limiting the opening up of networks to protect regional and local passenger services covered by public service contracts, pursuant to the new paragraph 3b of Article 10, the Committee recommends accepting the Council's extremely comprehensive provision, with minor changes and a return to Parliament's criterion of the viability of the public service contract.
Glej predlog spremembe 17 ter predloga sprememb 5 in 12.
See Amendment 17 and also Amendments 5 and 12.
Odbor meni, da je treba nove omejitve odpiranja omrežij – glavni namen storitve in prednost dolgoročnih koncesijskih pogodb – ki jih predlaga Svet, zavrniti.
The Committee believes strongly that the Council's proposed new limitations on opening up networks – the 'principal purpose' of the carriage of passengers and the priority given to long-term concession contracts – should be rejected.
S tem v zvezi glej tudi ustrezno izjavo Portugalske republike v prilogi II skupnega stališča.
In this connection, see also the relevant statement by the Portuguese Republic in Annex II to the common position.
Pri iskanju ravnovesja med odpiranjem enotnega trga, zastavljenega že pred desetletji, in posebnimi interesi javnih regionalnih in lokalnih potniških storitev je namreč mogoče možnost omejitve odpiranja omrežij iz novega besedila člena 10(3b) komaj še utemeljiti.
After all, in striking a balance between opening up the single market, which has been an objective for decades, and the special interests of public regional and local passenger services, the possibility of limiting the opening-up of networks can be justified by the new wording of Article 10(3b).
Odbor ni pristal na priporočilo poročevalca, da bi splošno dajatev (gl. uvodno izjavo 13 in novi predlagani člen 10(3f) Direktive 91/440/EGS) črtali brez nadomestitve, ampak je predlagal ustrezne spremembe.
However, the Committee did not accept the rapporteur’s recommendation to abolish the general levy without replacing it – cf Recital 13 and the proposed new Article 10(3f) of Directive 91/440/EEC – but proposed amendments in this area.
Glej predloge sprememb 16, 18, 20, 28, kot tudi predloge sprememb 3 in 15.
See Amendments 16, 18, 20 and 28, and also Amendments 3 and 15.
Kar zadeva novi predlog Sveta o zahtevi glede poročanja, odbor predlaga le manjše spremembe.
Where the Council's proposed new reporting requirements are concerned, the Committee proposes what are essentially drafting changes.
V dodatnem poročilu v letu 2012 naj bi preučili potek priprav na odprtje trga notranjih storitev potniškega prometa.
An additional report in 2012 should analyse the state of preparation for opening up national passenger services.
Glej predloga sprememb 25 in 13.
See Amendment 25 and also Amendment 13.
Zelo obsežne in deloma nove predloge Sveta za spremembo Direktive 2001/14/ES o dodeljevanju železniških infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti bi bilo v osnovi treba sprejeti in jih dopolniti z obrazložitvijo v uvodni izjavi.
The Council's very comprehensive proposals (some of which are new) for amending Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity should essentially be accepted, and supplemented by an explanatory justification.
Odbor priporoča prevzem novih predlogov o tranzitu ter izjemi za Malto in Ciper, pri čemer ne predlaga nobene spremembe.
The committee recommends taking over the new proposals on transit and on the exemptions for Cyprus and Malta, and therefore proposes no changes.
Za konec želi poročevalec poudariti, da je bilo vztrajanje Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi pri tem, naj Svet vzporedno s tem zakonodajnim postopkom sprejme skupno stališče o reviziji uredbe o javnih regionalnih in lokalnih potniških storitvah (glej predlog spremembe 1 poročila odbora iz prve obravnave) uspešno.
In conclusion, your rapporteur points out that Parliament's insistence at first reading on the need for the Council to adopt a common position on the revision of the Regulation on public regional and local passenger services, in parallel to this legislative procedure (see Amendment 1 to the committee's report at first reading), has proved successful.
ki ga v skladu s členom 48 (3) Poslovnika izražajo
expressed, pursuant to Rule 48(3) of the Rules of Procedure
Helmuth Markov, Erik Meijer in Pedro Guerreiro
by Helmuth Markov, Erik Meijer and Pedro Guerreiro
Radi bi znova opozorili na razloge za naše glasovanje proti skupnemu stališču Sveta Evropske unije.
We wish to set out the reasons for our vote against the common position adopted by the Council of the European Union.
Ne moremo sprejeti dejstva, da Evropska komisija predlaga tretji paket predlogov za pospešitev odprtja trga potniškega prometa potem, ko je bil drugi paket ravnokar izglasovan.
We cannot accept that the Commission is proposing a third package aiming to speed up passenger transport liberalisation when the second package has only just been adopted.
Še manj pa smo pripravljeni sprejeti predloge iz skupnega stališča Sveta oziroma priporočilo, ki ga je sprejel parlamentarni odbor za drugo obravnavo, ki gredo še dlje in predlagajo popolno odprtje železniškega trga v zelo kratkem času.
Still less can we accept the proposals of the Council common position, or the recommendation for second reading adopted by the Parliamentary committee, which aim to go even further and propose total liberalisation of the railways in a very short time.
Predlogi so bili oblikovani, ne da bi se upoštevalo učinkov predhodnih ukrepov, socialnih in okoljskih razmer ter ponovnega uravnoteženja železniškega prometa v primerjavi z drugimi prevoznimi oblikami.
These proposals have been made with no assessment of the effects of the previous measures, or of the social or environmental situation, or with regard to rebalancing rail in relation to other forms of transport.
Predlogi niso zasnovani na ničesar drugem, kot na preprosti ideologiji, katere prvo in splošno pravilo je „ultraliberalizem”.
These proposals are based on nothing but an a priori ideology making ultraliberalism an absolute and general rule.
Mi pa želimo, da nudi EU ustrezno pomoč tej obliki prevoza, ki je nujno potreben za trajnostni razvoj, ozemeljsko kohezijo in gospodarski razvoj v Evropi.
We, on the other hand, call for Europe to provide the assistance needed for this mode of transport which is essential for sustainable development, regional cohesion and the development of Europe's economy.
Menimo, da bi morali biti tovrstni ukrepi obravnavani in oblikovani v sodelovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi v sektorju.
We consider that such measures should be thought out and proposed in cooperation with all those involved in the sector.
Skupno stališče Sveta z namenom sprejetja direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/440/EGS o razvoju železnic Skupnosti in Direktive 2001/14/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dodeljevanju železniških infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti in naložitvi uporabnin za uporabo železniške infrastrukture
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways and Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure
Odbor/-ka Datum imenovanja
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed
Nadomeščeni/-a odbor/-ka
Previous rapporteur(s)
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o nekaterih tehničnih ukrepih za ohranitev nekaterih staležev izrazito selivskih vrst
on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down technical measures for the conservation of certain stocks of highly migratory species
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0100 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0100 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0106/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0106/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0476/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0476/2006 ),
(4a) Po mnenju znanstvenega odbora ICCAT sedanje ravni ulova navadnega tuna s sedanjim načinom izkoriščanja virov ne bo mogoče dolgoročno ohranjati, zato mora Evropska unija odboru ICCAT nujno predložiti ukrepe za obnavljanje staležev, vključno z načrtom za obnovo, če je to potrebno, pa tudi nadzorne ukrepe, ki bodo prispevali k rešitvi problema prelova in izjav, ki zmanjšujejo realni ulov.
(4a) According to the ICCAT scientific committee, current catch levels of bluefin tuna are not sustainable in the long term with the present exploitation patterns, and consequently the European Union should propose measures to rebuild the stock to ICCAT as a matter of urgency, including a recovery plan if necessary, together with control measures which will help to resolve the problems of overfishing and the underreporting of catches.
(4b) Znanstvene analize kažejo, da preti staležu navadnega tuna izumrtje, zaradi česar morajo Evropska unija ter njene države članice v skladu s priporočili omenjenih analiz, nujno uvesti nadzorne ukrepe za reševanje problema prelova, ki jih bo spremljal načrt za obnovo virov.
(4b) The scientific analyses point to a risk of collapse in the bluefin tuna fishery, and the European Union and its Member States should therefore urgently introduce control measures which will help to resolve the problem of overfishing, accompanied by a recovery plan, as recommended by the scientific analyses.
(4c) Da bi bili ti ukrepi učinkoviti, morajo pridobiti splošno soglasje, zato morajo Komisija in države članice v mednarodnem okviru nujno izvajati aktivno politiko za zaščito teh ukrepov, zlasti v regionalnih ribiških organizacijah, pristojnih za upravljanje z viri, in pri državah kot Japonska, ki predstavljajo prednostno tržišče za to vrsto.
(4c) If they are to be effective, these measures must enjoy general consensus, and it is therefore necessary for the Commission and the Member States to pursue an active policy to defend these measures in international fora as a matter of urgency, particularly vis-à-vis the regional fisheries organisations responsible for managing this resource and countries which are the main destination for this species, such as Japan.
(4d) Povečanje povpraševanja za to vrsto je privedlo do okrepitve ribolovnega napora tako za namene neposredne prodaje kot tudi za oskrbo posameznikov, ki tune gojijo, kar zahteva od Evropske unije in držav članic strog nadzor in izboljšanje informiranja o dejavnostih ribolova in gojenja, kar je nujno za pridobitev znanstvene ocene o stanju staležev.
(4d) The growing demand for this species has caused an increase in fishing pressure, both for direct sale and for supplying specimens to tuna farms, which requires, on the part of the European Union and the Member States, strict monitoring and improved information on both fishing and farming activity, since this is vital in order to be able to make a scientific assessment of the state of the resource.