natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
15. odločno poziva Komisijo k oblikovanju ambicioznih novih pobud za stabilizacijo cen osnovnih izdelkov, ki so temeljnega pomena za države v razvoju, in poudarja pomen pobud Komisije za spodbujanje diverzifikacije proizvodov in proizvodnje z dodano vrednostjo;
Urges the Commission to pursue ambitious new initiatives to stabilise the price of commodities which are essential to developing countries, and stresses the importance of Commission initiatives to stimulate product diversification and value-added production;
18. priznava, da je mogoče tak izpad dohodka nadomestiti z drugimi neposrednimi davki ali z DDV-jem, vendar opozarja na regresivno naravo nekaterih davčnih režimov, ki bi nesorazmerno prizadeli najrevnejše prebivalstvo, in tudi na tehnične težave pri njihovi uvedbi in dejanskem izvajanju;
Recognises the potential for this loss of revenue to be replaced by other direct taxes or VAT, but stresses the regressive nature of some of these tax regimes which would disproportionately impact on the poor, as well as the technical problems related to their introduction and practical implementation;
21. glede na ugotovljen pomen vlaganj za gospodarski razvoj držav AKP, poziva Komisijo k spremembam v delu investicijskega fonda EIB, da bi fondu omogočila spodbujanje dodatnih in v razvoj usmerjenih vlaganj;
Noting the importance of investment for the economic development of the ACP, urges the Commission to seek changes in the working of the EIB's investment facility, to enable the facility to promote additional and pro-development investment;
26. poudarja pomen doseganja vidnega napredka na področju povezovanja znotraj regije pred začetkom programa medregionalnega povezovanja;
Stresses the importance of achieving substantial intra-regional integration prior to embarking on a programme of inter-regional integration;
30. opominja Komisijo, da morda ne bo izvedljivo, da bi do leta 2008 lahko vse regionalne skupine začele postopno izvajati asimetrično vzajemni sporazum z EU o prosti trgovini, če ne bodo uvedeni ustrezni podporni ukrepi;
Reminds the Commission that it might not be feasible for all regional groupings to be in a position to begin gradually implementing an asymetrically reciprocal free trade agreement with the EU by 2008 unless adequate supporting measures are taken;
38. poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva, da so EU in države AKP skupaj dovolj velika skupina, da lahko zahtevajo morebitne reforme pravil STO, da bi bile pravičnejša in bolj prilagojena potrebam držav v razvoju in majhnih evropskih proizvajalcev;
Calls on the Commission to consider that EU and ACP countries together are a constituency large enough to demand for eventual reforms of WTO rules, to make them more just and suited to the needs of both developing countries and small European producers;
40. poziva k večji preglednosti pri napredku in vsebini pogajanj ter izvajanju razvojne pomoči sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu ter k večji vključenosti akterjev civilne družbe iz držav AKP, zasebnega sektorja, nacionalnih parlamentov, lokalnih vlad, Evropskega parlamenta in Skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP–EU v pogajanja;
Calls for greater transparency with regard to the progress and the substance of the negotiations as well as the delivery of EPA development assistance, and for greater involvement of ACP civil society players, the private sector, national-level parliaments, local governments, the European Parliament and the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly in the negotiations;
44. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam držav članic EU in vladam držav AKP, Svetu AKP–EU in Skupni parlamentarni skupščini AKP–EU.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments of the EU Member States and of the ACP countries, the ACP-EU Council and the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly.
Vplivi sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu na razvoj
The development impact of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs)
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2728/94 o ustanovitvi Jamstvenega sklada za zunanje ukrepe
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA......................6
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................2
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE...........................................................................13
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS...............2
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0130 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0130 )
UL C ..., 13.1.2006, str. .... ,
OJ C .., 13.1.2006, p. ... ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 308 Pogodbe ES in člena 203 Pogodbe Euratom, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0176/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty and to Article 203 of the EAEC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0176/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0054/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0054/2006 ),
NAVDBA SKLICEVANJA 1
CITATION 1
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 181a Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 181a thereof,
Del tega predloga, ki se nanaša na Evropsko skupnost (znaten del zneska posojil, ki jih krije mehanizem jamstvenega sklada) sodi v okvir člena 181a Pogodbe in ne člena 308, kot je predlagala Komisija.
The European Community part of this proposal (the substantive part of the volume of loans covered by the guarantee fund mechanism) falls under Art. 181a of the Treaty, not Art. 308 as proposed by the Commission.
Postopki glasovanja bodo zahtevali kvalificirano večino v Svetu.
Voting procedures will entail qualified majority in the Council.
To je nezdružljivo z delom predloga, ki se nanaša na Euratom in za katerega je potrebno soglasje.
This becomes incompatible with the Euratom part of the proposal, which requires unanimity.
Komisijo je zato tudi pozvana, da predstavi nov predlog v zvezi z delom Euratom.
The Commission is therefore also invited to present a new proposal concerning the Euratom part.
NAVEDBA SKLICEVANJA 2
CITATION 2
Ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti člena 203 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 203 thereof,
(4) Če bodo rezerve, ustvarjene za financiranje Jamstvenega sklada, v finančni perspektivi za leta 2007–2013 ukinjene, bo moralo biti financiranje za Jamstveni sklad zagotovljeno kot obvezni izdatek iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije .
(4) Should the reserve created to endow the Guarantee Fund be abolished for the Financial Perspectives 2007–2013, the funding of the Guarantee Fund should be provided for as an obligatory expenditure from the general budget of the European Union .
(4) Če bodo rezerve, ustvarjene za financiranje Jamstvenega sklada, v finančni perspektivi za leta 2007–2013 ukinjene, se bo moral Jamstveni sklad financirati zunaj zgornje meje finančne perspektive in vključiti v rezerve .
(4) Should the reserve created to endow the Guarantee Fund be abolished for the Financial Perspectives 2007–2013, the Guarantee Fund should be financed outside the Financial Perspective ceilings and included in the reserve.
Ta predlog spremembe sledi priporočilom resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o političnih izzivih in proračunskih sredstvih razširjene Unije 2007-2013 ( 2004/2209(INI) ), odstavek 46 z dne 8. junija 2005.
This amendment follows the recommendations on the European Parliament resolution on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 ( 2004/2209(INI) ) of 8 June 2005, paragraph 46.
(7) Pogodbi za sprejem te uredbe predvidevata samo pooblastila, določena v členu 308 Pogodbe ES in v členu 203 Pogodbe EURATOM –
(7) The Treaties do not provide, for the adoption of this Regulation, powers, other than those in Article 308 of the EC Treaty and Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty,
Glej predlog spremembe 1.
See amendment 1
Člen 5, odstavek 2 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2728/94)
Article 5, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94)
Izračuni na osnovi tega izravnalnega mehanizma bodo narejeni ločeno od izračunov iz člena 3, tretji odstavek, in iz člena 4.
The calculations based on this smoothing mechanism shall be made separately from the calculations referred to in Article 3, third paragraph, and in Article 4.
Kljub temu bodo skupaj sestavljali en letni prenos.
Nevertheless, they will together result in one annual transfer.
Zneski, ki naj bi bili plačani iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije po tem izravnalnem mehanizmu, bodo obravnavani kot neto premoženje Sklada za izračune v skladu s členoma 3 in 4.
The amounts to be paid from the general budget of the European Union under this smoothing mechanism shall be treated as net assets of the Fund for the calculation pursuant to Articles 3 and 4.
Kljub temu bodo skupaj sestavljali en letni prenos , vendar bodo jasno navajali različne dele.
Nevertheless, they will together result in one annual transfer , but clearly indicating the different parts.
Zaradi preglednosti in informacije proračunskemu organu
.For reasons of transparency and information to the Budgetary Authority
Člen 5, odstavek 3 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2728/94)
Article 5, paragraph 3 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94)
Če bodo kot posledica aktivacije zavarovanja na enem ali več neplačil sredstva v Skladu padla pod 50 % ciljnega zneska, bo Komisija predložila poročilo o izrednih ukrepih za dopolnitev Sklada.“
If, as a result of the activation of guarantees on one or more major defaults, resources in the Fund fall below 50 % of the target amount, the Commission shall submit a report on exceptional measures that might be required to replenish the Fund.”
Če bodo kot posledica aktivacije zavarovanja zaradi enega ali več neplačil sredstva v Skladu padla pod 75 % ciljnega zneska, bo Komisija nemudoma obvestila proračunski organ o razlogih za ta položaj in predložila poročilo o izrednih ukrepih za dopolnitev Sklada.“
If, as a result of the activation of guarantees on one or more major defaults, resources in the Fund fall below 75% of the target amount, the Commission shall immediately inform the budgetary authority as to the reasons for this situation and submit a report on exceptional measures that might be required to replenish the Fund.”
Preudarno je vzpostaviti mehanizem zgodnjega opozarjanja v primeru, da bi nekatera večja posojila ne mogla biti odplačana.
A mechanism of early-warning is prudent in case some major loans were not to be repaid.
Zgornja meja 75 % bi proračunskemu organu dala več časa za ocenitev položaja na osnovi predloga Komisije.
A threshold figure of 75 % would give more time for the budgetary authority to assess the situation on the basis of the Commission proposal.
Komisija je posredovala predlog spremembe uredbe za Jamstveni sklad o zunanjem delovanju s stališča oblikovanja proračunskih rezervacij.
The Commission has put forward a proposal to modify the Regulation for the Guarantee Fund for external actions as far as the budgetary provisioning is concerned.
Spremenil naj bi se 'mehanizem' oblikovanja rezervacij sredstev iz proračuna EU.
It is this "mechanism" of how the fund is provisioned from the EU budget that is being changed in the current proposal.
Predlog ne velja za način vzpostavljanja obstoječih mandatov za posojila (tj., za katere države bodo veljala posojila s solidarnim poroštvom EU ter koliko oziroma kakšen odstotek posojila).
The way in which the actual lending mandates are established (i.e. which countries can be covered by EU guarantees for lending and, how much/which percentage of loans can be covered) is not affected by this proposal.
Novi mehanizem oblikovanja rezervacij Sklada bo zaradi tehničnih dejavnikov začel veljati leta 2007, ko naj bi začela veljati nova finančna perspektiva.
Due to technical factors, the new mechanism for provisioning the Fund would start working in 2007, parallel with the possible introduction of a new Financial Perspective.
Pripravljen je torej predlog v smislu nove finančne perspektive, na podlagi predvidene strukture proračunskih postavk.
The proposal is also drafted with the new FP in mind, utilising the structure of budget headings foreseen therein.
Poročevalec želi opozoriti, da je glavni namen Jamstvenega sklada zavarovati proračun pred 'šoki', do katerih bi prišlo zaradi neplačila posojil, za katera jamči EU.
The rapporteur wishes to recall that the main purpose of the Guarantee Fund is to protect the EU budget from "shocks" that might otherwise occur in case of defaults on loans that are guaranteed by the EU.
V primeru neplačila posojil bi posegel Sklad (namesto proračuna neposredno) in vrnil denar posojilodajalcu (običajno EIB).
In the case of such loan defaults, the Fund (rather than the budget directly) would step in and pay back the money to the lender (normally the EIB).
Da bi imel Sklad na voljo potrebne zneske, je potrebno v sklad vplačati (iz proračuna za posojila) določen odstotek, ki trenutno znaša 9%.
In order to have the necessary amounts available in the Fund, a certain percentage, currently 9%, is paid into the fund from the budget for the loans granted.
Predviden celotni razpoložljivi znesek Sklada (ciljni znesek) je 9% vseh neodplačanih posojil.
In this way, the total amount available in the Fund (the target amount) will be 9% of the total of outstanding loans.
Obstoječi mehanizem oblikovanja rezervacij Sklada temelji na sistemu, po katerem se v Sklad vplača 9% posojil predhodno.
The present mechanism to provision the Fund is based on a system whereby 9% of the loans are paid into the Fund on an "ex-ante" basis.
To pomeni plačila na podlagi načrtovanih podpisov posojil.
This has meant payments on the basis of planned loan signatures.
Obstoječi sistem tudi pomeni, da se EP predloži več prenosov letno (običajno dva do tri prenose letno).
The present system also means that a number of transfers are presented each year to the EP (normally 2 or 3 transfers per year).
Prenosi (za obvezne izdatke EP izda le mnenje) so dejansko tehnične narave.
These transfers (which are for compulsory expenditure with only an opinion of the EP) are actually of a technical nature.
To še posebej velja, ker sama uredba določa, da se ob podpisu posojila prenese odgovarjajočih 9% v Sklad.
This is particularly the case since the Regulation itself actually specifies that, when a loan is signed, the corresponding 9% shall be transferred into the Fund.
Svet bi kršil zakon, če bi zavrnil katerega od teh prenosov.
The Council would thus be breaking the law if it were to reject one of these transfers.
V spremenjenem sistemu, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, naj bi se rezervacije oblikovale enkrat letno.
In the modified system now proposed by the Commission, the provisioning of the Fund would be done only once a year.
Potreben znesek naj bi bil znan v času PPP in predviden kot druge vrstice.
The amount necessary would be known at the time of the PDB and budgeted as other items.
Predložen naj bi bil le en prenos sredstev iz proračuna v Sklad.
One single transfer would then be presented to transfer the money from the budget into the Fund.
To je po mnenju Komisije mogoče, ker naj bi novi sistem deloval 'ex-post' in bi le oblikoval rezervacije Sklada obstoječih neto izplačil (izplačanih posojil), kar bi ob koncu leta privedlo do zanesljivejšega ciljnega zneska za Sklad.
This, according to the Commission, is possible since the new system would work on an "ex-post" basis and only provision the Fund on the basis of actual net disbursements (loans actually paid out) which would lead to a more reliable target amount for the Fund at the end of each year.
Znesek posameznega prenosa bi se za prilagoditev Skladu predvidel v PPP za naslednje leto v višini 9% neodplačanih posojil.
The amount for the one single transfer would then be budgeted, in the PDB for the next year, in order to adjust the Fund so it corresponds to 9% of the outstanding loans.
Glavna razlika predlaganega mehanizma je, da je namenjen delovanju v novi finančni perspektivi za leta 2007-2013.
A major difference between the mechanisms proposed is that it is designed to operate under the new FP 2007-2013.
To pomeni, da bo (v nasprotju z obstoječim sistemom) proračunska vrstica, iz katere se vzamejo odobrena sredstva za oblikovanje rezerv Sklada v postavki 4 predlagane finančne perspektive (zunanje delovanje), medtem, ko je ta proračunska vrstica v obstoječem sistemu v postavki 6 (rezerve).
This means that , contrary to the present system, the budget line from which appropriations are taken to provision the Fund will be in heading 4 of the proposed FP (external actions) whereas in the present system, this budget line is in heading 6 (reserves).
V novem sistemu naj tudi ne bi bilo zgornje meje rezerve (200 milijonov evrov v cenah iz leta 1999).
The current maximum figure of this reserve (EUR 200 m in 1999 prices) would also not exist in the new system.
To je rezultat predloga Komisije za obdobje po letu 2007 in ne tega predloga.
This is a consequence of the Commission's proposals for 2007+, not this particular proposal.
Ta rezerva pa bi izginila, če bi se novi medinstitucionalni sporazum sprejel v skladu s predlogom Komisije.
This reserve would disappear if the new IIA is adopted along the lines suggested by the Commission.
Pristop je protisloven, saj resolucija EP o prihodnji finančni perspektivi zahteva nadaljnje delovanje takega instrumenta do zgornje meje 3 milijonov evrov, vendar zunaj nove finančne perspektive.
This approach is, however, somewhat controversial as demonstrated by the fact that the EP's resolution on the Future financial perspective asks for a continued functioning of such an instrument, to the tune of EUR 3 billion a year, but outside the new FP.
Poročevalec mora zato od Komisije jasno zahtevati pripombe na povezavo med tem predlogom in medinstitucionalnim sporazumom, o katerem se je še potrebno pogajati in ki še ni bil določen.
The rapporteur must therefore clearly ask the Commission to comment on the relationship of this proposal with an IIA which has yet to be negotiated and is not fixed.
Poročevalec meni, da če bi veljale predlagane spremembe v proračunski vrstici postavke 4 nove finančne perspektive, da se predvidi izravnalni mehanizem za primere (ni verjetno), v katerih bi letni znesek, vplačan v Sklad presegal 100 milijonov evrov.
The rapporteur notes that, as the changes proposed would operate with a budget line under heading 4 of a possible new FP, a special "smoothing mechanism" is foreseen for cases (unlikely) in which the annual amount to be paid into the Fund would exceed EUR 100 million.
Poročevalec meni, da bi predlagane spremembe lahko deloma rešile eno od dolgotrajnih kritik odbora za proračun, ker se nanaša na 'čezmerno oblikovanje rezerv' Sklada.
The rapporteur notes that the proposed changes could, in part, address one of the Budget Committee's long-standing criticisms as concerns the unnecessary "over-provisioning" of the Fund.
Z delovanjem na podlagi dejansko izplačanih posojil namesto zapletenih napovedi o podpisu posojil bi bila uporaba proračunskih sredstev poenostavljena in bi se izognili vplačilu nepotrebnih pretiranih zneskov v Sklad (ki bi se potem vračali posamezni državi članici v letnem rebalansu proračuna iz presežka proračuna).
In fact, by working on the basis of actually disbursed loans rather than complicated forecasts of the signing of loans, the use of EU budgetary resources would be simplified and some excess amounts paid into the Fund (and then returned to Member States each year in the annual AB on the budgetary surplus) could actually be avoided.
Poročevalec je že enkrat prej pozval, da se popravi odstotek oblikovanja rezervacij iz 9% na morda bolj stvarnih 8%.
The rapporteur has previously called for the provisioning rate of 9% to be adjusted, perhaps to a more realistic rate of 8%.
To pa se mora obravnavati v smislu prihajajočih predlogov splošnih mandatov za posojila (za katere države? s kakšnim jamstvom? v kakšnem odstotku?) in da ponovimo, ne v okviru obstoječega predloga.
This is, however, something that should be examined in the light of the upcoming proposals of the general lending mandates (which countries? how much guaranteed? which rate?) and, again, not in the scope of the present proposal.
Oblikovanje rezervacij Jamstvenega sklada na podlagi izplačil posojil namesto predhodnega napovedovanja bi bilo smiselno in bi omogočalo smotrnejšo uporabo proračunskih izdatkov EU.
To provision the Guarantee Fund on the basis of actual disbursements of loans, instead of ex-ante forecasting, would appear to make sense and to allow for a more rational use of EU budget expenditure.
Skrajšalo bi tudi nekatere administrativne postopke.
It would also cut down on some red tape.
Novi sistem prenosov tudi za EP (en sam letni prenos na podlagi zneska, predvidenega v PPP, namesto treh prenosov na podlagi napovedi) ne bi bil neugoden.
The new system of transfers for the EP (one single annual transfer on the basis of an amount foreseen in the PDB, instead of two or three transfers on the basis of forecasts) would not seem to be a disadvantage.
EP ima v vsakem primeru le mnenje in ti prenosi se 'morajo' sprejeti v skladu z veljavno uredbo.
The EP has in any case only an opinion and these transfers "must" be adopted according to the Regulation in force.
Predlog ne velja za opustitev določenega zneska za rezerve v proračunu (200 milijonov evrov v postavki 6 obstoječega sistema), ampak je zajet v predlogih za novo finančno perspektivo za leta 2007-2013.
The scrapping of the fixed amount for a reserve in the budget (EUR 200m in heading 6 in the current system) is not covered by this proposal but, instead, suggested in the proposals for a new FP 2007-2013.
Poročevalec poziva Komisijo, da pojasni povezavo med tem predlogom in možnimi izidi pogajanj o novi finančni perspektivi oziroma medinstitucionalnem sporazumu.
The rapporteur calls on the Commission to clarify the link between this proposal and possible outcomes of the negotiations on a new FP/IIA.
Poročevalec načeloma podpira predlagane spremembe Komisije, če se nanašajo na učinkovitejši proračunski postopek oblikovanja rezervacij Sklada.
The rapporteur is initially positive to the proposed changes by the Commission as they relate to the more effective budgetary treatment of provisioning the Fund.
Predlog ne velja za zakonodajni postopek o 'mandatih za posojila'.
The legislative procedure which concerns the "lending Mandates" is not covered by this proposal.
EP bo še naprej obdržal sedanje pristojnosti (mnenje, posredovano Svetu).
The EP will continue to have its current powers (opinion to the Council).
Nenazadnje poročevalec meni, da je Komisija uporabila nepravilno pravno podlago.
Finally, the rapporteur believes that the Commission may have used the wrong legal base.
Izgleda, da bi se moral uporabiti člen 181a Pogodbe iz Nice (gospodarsko sodelovanje s tretjimi državami).
It would seem that, ever since the Treaty of Nice, article 181A should be used (economic cooperation with third countries).
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi o predlogu Uredbe Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 2728/94 o ustanovitvi Jamstvenega sklada za zunanje ukrepe ( COM(2005)0130 – C6 0176/2005 – 2005/0025(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions ( COM(2005)0130 – C6‑0176/2005 – 2005/0025(CNS) )
v pismu z dne 1. februarja 2006 ste Odbor za pravne zadeve v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika zaprosili za mnenje o pravilnosti in primernosti pravne podlage zgoraj omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 1 February 2006 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs, pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.