natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice se morajo zato začeti ukvarjati z metodologijo zbiranja podatkov.
The Member States must therefore start to be involved in data collection methodology.
Priloga I, tabela, vrsta 3, stolpec 3 (novo)
Annex I, table, line 3, column 3 (new)
To se ne nanaša na snovi, ki se pojavljajo v naravi in ki so registrirane kot aktivne sestavine biocidnih pripravkov, ter za katere je raven naravnega ozadja višja, kot predlagani standardi kakovosti.
This standard does not apply to naturally occurring substances registered as active ingredients for biocidal products, and for which the natural background level is higher than the proposed quality standard
Nekatere aktivne snov, dovoljene pri pripravi biocidnih pripravkih, so snovi, ki se pojavljajo v naravi (npr. natrijev klorid, jod, srebro, baker itd.).
Some active ingredients authorised for use in biocidal products are naturally occurring substances (e.g. sodium chloride, iodine, silver, copper, etc. ).
Zato je v okoljih, kjer se te naravne snovi nahajaj, njihova prisotnost v okoliški podtalnici veliko višja kot predlagana meja 0.1 µg/l.
Therefore, in the environments where such natural substances occur, their presence in the neighbouring groundwater is much higher than the proposed limit of 0.1 μg/l.
To zgolj odraža naravno ozadje.
This would just reflect the natural background.
Poleg tega sta natrijev klorid (kuhinjska sol) in jod močno prisotna v morski vodi.
More so, sodium chloride (salt for cooking) and iodine are massively present in sea water.
Zato ni smiselno določiti mejne vrednosti za te snovi, ki se pojavljajo v naravi, čeprav so dovoljene za pripravo biocidnih pripravkov.
Therefore, it make no sense to impose a limit value for these naturally occurring substances, even if they are authorised for use in biocidal products.
Priloga III, del B, poglavje 2.3
Annex III, part B, section 2.3
Razlogi za način upoštevanja ekonomskih in socialnih stroškov pri vrednotenju ukrepov, namenjenih dobremu kemijskemu statusu podzemne vode.
2.3 The reasoning underlying the manner in which the economic and social costs are taken into account when assessing measures aimed at achieving good groundwater chemical status.
Ekonomski in socialni stroški se ne smejo upoštevati pri določitvi mejnih vrednosti, jih je pa treba upoštevati pri vrednotenju ukrepov, ki bi lahko bili sprejeti za dosego dobrega statusa.
Economic and social costs should not be a consideration for establishing threshold values, but should be considered in assessing the measures which may be taken to achieve a good status.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podtalnice pred onesnaževanjem
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on the protection of groundwater against pollution
Pripombe Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Comments: also present for the final vote
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on the protection of groundwater against pollution
Odbor za kmetijstvo je dne 16. marca 2004 sprejel mnenje o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem s 17 glasovi za, 0 proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
On 16 March 2004, the Committee on Agriculture adopted its opinion on protection of groundwater against pollution by 17 votes to 0 with 1 abstention.
Zakonodajni postopek v Parlamentu v času 5. mandata ni bil zaključen, zato mora Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja sprejeti novo mnenje.
Since the legislative procedure in Parliament was not concluded during the 5th term, a new opinion needs to be adopted by the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development.
Pripravljavec mnenja je ponovno predložil mnenje, ki ga je sprejel prejšnji odbor, in prosi, da se ga potrdi brez nadaljnjih sprememb.
The draftsman resubmits the opinion as adopted by the previous Committee and asks for it to be confirmed with no further changes.
Nekateri, predvsem tehnični vidiki ocenjevanja kakovosti podzemne vode so ostali ob sprejetju Okvirne direktive o vodah
Some, primarily technical, aspects of groundwater quality assessment were left out when the Water Framework Directive
Direktiva 2000/60/ES, UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str.
Directive 2000/60/EC, OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.
1 leta 2000 nedorečeni.
1. was adopted in 2000.
Cilj predlagane direktive o podzemni vodi je zapolniti to vrzel, med drugim z opredelitvijo "dobrega kemijskega stanja podzemne vode" in "meril za ugotavljanje pomembnih in stalnih trendov naraščanja in za določanje izhodišč za njihovo obračanje".
The proposed Groundwater Directive aims to fill these gaps by defining, for instance, ‘good groundwater chemical status’ and ‘criteria for the identification of significant and sustained upward trends and the definition of starting points for trend reversals’.
Pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja predlog direktive, saj je odgovor na težave, ki izhajajo iz sprememb kemijske sestave podzemne vode v Skupnosti zaradi geografskih in geoloških razlik ter pomanjkanja podatkov, pridobljenih pri spremljanju in nadzoru.
The draftsman welcomes the proposal because it provides a response to problems arising from variations in the chemical composition of groundwater in the Community, because of geographical and geological differences, and the fact that monitoring data have been lacking.
Glavne značilnosti predlaganih sprememb
Main features of the suggested amendments
Pripravljavec mnenja se zaveda, da namerava Komisija nadalje prilagajati direktivo o podzemni vodi glede na pridobljene izkušnje držav članic pri uporabi sedanjega predloga.
The draftsman acknowledges the fact that the Commission intends to adapt the groundwater directive further, taking account of the experience gained by the Member States in applying the present proposal.
Take negativne učinke je treba analizirati in nato ukrepati v skladu z določenimi kriteriji.
Such negative effects should be analysed and acted upon in accordance with specific criteria.
Pripravljavec mnenja poudarja tudi pomembnost podobnih metod merjenja v Uniji.
The draftsman also stresses the importance of similar measurement techniques across the Union.
Za dosego učinkovitejše politike o kakovosti vode mora te metode merjenja odobriti Komisija ob upoštevanju njihove učinkovitosti v zvezi s cilji direktive in delovanjem notranjega trga.
For water quality policy to be effective, these measurement techniques should be approved by the Commission, taking into account their effectiveness in respect of the goals of the directive and the functioning of the Internal Market.
V ta namen se vstavi nov člen.
To this effect a new article is introduced.
Pripravljavec predlaga, naj Komisija preuči, če se Nitratna direktiva
The draftsman suggests that the Commission should analyse whether the Nitrates Directive
Direktiva 1991/676/ES, UL L 375, 31.12.1991, str.
Directive 1991/676/EEC, OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p.
1 od leta 2009 naprej lahko ukine.
1. can be repealed from 2009.
Ko se bosta Okvirna direktiva o vodah in predlagana Direktiva o podzemni vodi v celoti izvajali, bi njun učinek Nitratno direktivo lahko naredil odvečno.
When fully implemented, the combined effects of the Water Framework Directive and the proposed Groundwater Directive could render the Nitrates Directive superfluous.
Poleg tega je direktiva sporna z več vidikov:
Moreover, that directive has proved highly problematic in several respects:
– določa največjo količino dušika živalskega izvora na hektar (170 kg), pri čemer ne upošteva niti podnebnih ali talnih pogojev niti neživalskih virov dušika, kot so gnojila;
– The directive prescribes a maximum amount of Nitrogen of animal origin to be applied per hectare (170 kg) but does not take into account climatic or soil conditions, nor non-animal sources of Nitrogen such as fertilisers;
– tako z vidika subsidiarnosti kot učinkovitosti je ustrezneje, če se na ravni Skupnosti določi cilj (50 mg N/l, ki v Nitratni direktivi ni niti omenjen) kot pa način za dosego tega cilja (170 kg N/ha);
– Both subsidiarity and efficiency are better served if the goal (50 mg N/l, not even mentioned in the Nitrates Directive) is defined at Community level, rather than the way to achieve the goal (170 kg N/ha);
– direktiva ni preveč uspešna, saj je Komisija proti desetim do petnajstim državam članicam sprožila postopek zaradi napačnega ali pomanjkljivega izvajanja.
– The directive does not seem to have been very successful, since the Commission has taken twelve of fifteen Member States to Court over wrong or inadequate implementation.
Bistveno je zagotoviti dosledno upoštevanje standardov kakovosti pitne vode, določenih v Direktivi o pitni vodi
It is essential to ensure good compliance with drinking water standards as defined by the Drinking Water Directive
Direktiva 98/83/ES, UL L 330, 5.12.1998, str.
Directive 98/83/EC, OJ L 330, 5.12.1998, p.
Zato se predlaga, da se, kjer je to potrebno za doseganje standarda pitne vode, uporablja vrednost pesticidov/metabolitov, nižja od 0,1 µg/l.
It is suggested, therefore, to apply pesticides/metabolites values below 0.1 µg/l, where this is necessary to meet the drinking water standard.
Poleg tega se v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo predlaga skupna koncentracija 0,5 µg/l.
A total concentration of 0.5 µg/l, in line with existing legislation, is also suggested.
Nazadnje je pripravljavec mnenja poudaril potrebo po polnem sodelovanju Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zakonodajnem postopku pri spreminjanju minimalnega seznama iz priloge III.
Finally, the draftsman wishes to stress the need for full engagement of the European Parliament and the Council through legislation when it comes to amending the minimum list in Annex III.
Ta ključni del predlagane direktive se ne bi smel spreminjati v okviru postopka komitologije.
This crucial part of the proposed directive should not be subject to modifications by way of commitology.
Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podzemne vode pred kemičnim onesnaževanjem
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against chemical pollution
(1) Podzemna voda je dragocen naravni vir in ga je kot takega treba varovati pred onesnaževanjem.
(1) Groundwater is a valuable natural resource which should be protected from pollution in its own right.
(1) Podzemna voda je dragocen naravni vir in ga je kot takega treba varovati pred kemičnim onesnaževanjem.
(1) Groundwater is a valuable natural resource which should be protected from chemical pollution in its own right.
(3a) Telesa podzemne vode morajo biti zaščitena za varovanje sposobnosti preživetja evropskega kmetijstva, ki predstavlja ključno orodje v boju proti širjenju puščav.
(3a) Groundwater bodies also need to be protected in order to safeguard the viability of European agriculture, which constitutes an essential tool in the fight against desertification.
Podzemne vodonosnike je treba zaščititi pred prihodnjim pretiranim izkoriščanjem, zaradi katerega lahko postanejo onesnaženi, ki lahko zniža njihov tok, kar lahko celo povzroči njihovo izginotje.
Underground aquifers need to be protected from future over-exploitation which may cause them to become polluted, may drastically reduce their flow and may even result in their disappearance.
Vodonosnike je treba izčrpno spremljati, da je omogočeno pravočasno posredovanje v primeru kakršnega koli znatnega zmanjšanja količine vode ali kakršnega koli povečanja onesnaženosti.
Aquifers must be monitored exhaustively in order to enable the necessary action to be taken in good time in the event of any significant reduction in the volume of water or any increase in pollution.
Namakanje se ne sme prenehati, saj bi to povzročilo izgubo rastlinja, ki prekriva tla, to pa igra ključno vlogo v boju proti širjenju puščav.
Irrigation must not be allowed to cease, since this would lead to a loss of ground-cover vegetation which plays an essential role in the fight against desertification.
Zato je treba vodotoke ščititi pred pretiranim izkoriščanjem.
Action must therefore be taken to guard against the over-exploitation of aquifers.
(4a)Treba je postaviti merila za oceno učinkov, ki jih lahko ima znižanje vodnih rezerv vodonosnikov, na okolje.
Criteria also need to be established for assessing the effects which any reduction in aquifers’ water reserves may have on the environment.
(5a) Preučiti je treba vpliv različnih mejnih vrednosti, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, na raven varstva okolja in delovanje notranjega trga.
(5a) The impact on the environmental protection level and on the functioning of the Internal Market of different threshold values applied by the Member States should be analysed.
(6) Treba je postaviti merila za prepoznavanje kakršnih koli pomembnih in stalno naraščajočih trendov onesnaževal in za določanje začetne točke za obrat trenda rasti, ob tem pa je treba upoštevati možnost škodljivih učinkov na povezane vodne ekosisteme ali odvisne kopenske ekosisteme.
Criteria need to be established for identifying any significant and sustained upward trends in pollutant concentrations and for defining the starting point for trend reversal, taking into account the likelihood of adverse effects on associated aquatic ecosystems or dependent terrestrial ecosystems.
(6) Treba je postaviti merila za prepoznavanje kakršnih koli pomembnih in stalno naraščajočih trendov onesnaževal, za prepoznavanje pomembnih padajočih trendov velikosti vodnih teles in za določanje začetne točke za obrat trenda rasti, ob tem pa je treba upoštevati možnost škodljivih učinkov na povezane vodne ekosisteme ali odvisne kopenske ekosisteme.
Criteria need to be established for identifying any significant and sustained upward trends in pollutant concentrations , for identifying significant downward trends in the size of water bodies and for defining the starting point for trend reversal, taking into account the likelihood of adverse effects on associated aquatic ecosystems or dependent terrestrial ecosystems.
(8a) Ta direktiva in Direktiva 2000/60/ES bosta zagotovili zadostne standarde kakovosti za nitrate, zato je treba preučiti, ali se Direktiva 91/476/EES od 31. decembra 2008 naprej lahko ukine.
(8a) Since Directive 2000/60/EC and this Directive will provide sufficient threshold values for nitrates, it should be analysed whether Directive 91/476/EEC 1 may be repealed from 31 December 2008.
Ta direktiva določa evropske mejne vrednosti za koncentracijo nitratov z vidika kakovosti podzemne vode (50 mg/l), medtem ko Nitratna direktiva določa sredstvo za dosego cilja (170 kg N živalskega izvora/ha.
This Directive sets a European threshold for the concentration of nitrates in groundwater in the interests of quality (50 mg/l), whereas the Nitrates Directive prescribes a means (170 kg of N of animal origin / ha) of achieving the goal.
Določanju sredstev namesto cilja se je treba izogniti.
Prescribing of means rather than goals should be avoided.
Člen 1, pododstavek 1
Article 1, paragraph 1
Direktiva vzpostavlja posebne ukrepe iz člena 17(1) in (2) Direktive 2000/60/ES z namenom preprečevanja in nadzorovanja onesnaževanja podzemne vode.
This Directive establishes specific measures as set out in Article 17(1) and (2) of Directive 2000/60/EC in order to prevent and control groundwater pollution.
Ti ukrepi vključujejo zlasti:
These measures include in particular:
Direktiva vzpostavlja posebne ukrepe iz člena 17(1) in (2) Direktive 2000/60/ES z namenom preprečevanja in nadzorovanja kemičnega onesnaževanja podzemne vode.
This Directive establishes specific measures as set out in Article 17(1) and (2) of Directive 2000/60/EC in order to prevent and control chemical groundwater pollution.
Ta direktiva določa posebne ukrepe v skladu s členoma 17(1) in (2) Direktive 2000/60/ES za preprečevanje in nadziranje onesnaženja podzemnih voda.
This Directive establishes specific measures as set out in Article 17(1) and (2) of Directive 2000/60/EC in order to prevent and control groundwater pollution.
Ukrepi vključujejo zlasti:
These measures include in particular:
Ta direktiva določa posebne ukrepe v skladu s členoma 17(1) in (2) Direktive 2000/60/ES za preprečevanje in nadziranje onesnaženja podzemnih voda in za preprečevanje škodljivih učinkov kakršnega koli upadanja vodnih rezerv .
This Directive establishes specific measures as set out in Article 17(1) and (2) of Directive 2000/60/EC in order to prevent and control groundwater pollution and to prevent the harmful effects of any reduction in water reserves .
(a) merila za oceno kakovosti kemičnega stanja podzemnih voda; in
(a) criteria for the assessment of good groundwater chemical status; and
(c) merila za prepoznavanje in obrat pomembnih in stalno naraščajočih trendov ter za opredelitev začetnih točk za obrat trenda rasti.
(c) criteria for the identification and reversal of significant and sustained upward trends and for the definition of starting points for trend reversals.
Predlog direktive je precej ohlapen, ko gre za spremljanje kakovosti podzemne vode iz člena 8 Okvirne direktive o vodah.
The proposal for a directive is rather vague as regards the qualitative monitoring of groundwater provided for in Article 8 of the Framework Directive on water.
Člen 1, pododstavek 2
Article 1, paragraph 2
Direktiva vsebuje tudi zahtevo po preprečitvi ali omejitvi posrednega odvajanja onesnaževal v podzemno vodo.
This Directive also establishes a requirement to prevent or limit indirect discharges of pollutants into groundwater .
Direktiva natančno določa zahtevo iz člena 4(1)(b)(i) Direktive 2000/60/ES po preprečitvi ali omejitvi vnašanja onesnaževal v podzemno vodo in slabšanja stanja vseh teles podzemne vode .
This Directive specifies the requirement of Article 4(1)(b)(i) of Directive 2000/60/EC to prevent or limit the input of pollutants into groundwater and the deterioration of the status of all bodies of groundwater.
Direktiva ne bi smela vzpostavljati novega koncepta "posrednega odvajanja".
The Directive should not introduce a new concept of ' indirect discharges ' .
Okvirna direktiva o vodah (WDF) razlikuje le med splošnim "vnašanjem" in posebnimi primeri "neposrednega odvajanja" onesnaževal v podzemno vodo.
The Water Framework Directive (WFD) only distinguishes between the general case of ' input ' and the specific case of 'direct discharge ' of pollutants into groundwater.
Direktiva mora jasno opredeliti obveznosti Okvirne direktive o vodah glede "preprečevanja" in "omejevanja" snovi, ki onesnažujejo, in zagotoviti ukrepe EU za uresničevanje obveznosti preprečevanja v primeru pomembnih evropskih onesnaževal.
The Directive should clarify the WFD obligations on substances ' to prevent ' and substances ' to limit ' and provide EU measures for achieving the prevention obligations in cases of European relevant pollutants.
Prav tako mora pojasniti obveznost Okvirne direktive o vodah glede poslabšanja kemijskega stanja podzemne vode.
It should also clarify the WFD obligation of preventing the deterioration of chemical groundwater status.
Nekateri to obveznost razumejo kot ohranjanje statusa quo, drugi pa kot preprečevanje poslabšanja iz dobrega v slabo kemijsko stanje.
While some read this obligation as maintaining the status quo, others read it as preventing deterioration from good to poor chemical status.
Člen 2, pododstavek 1
Article 2, paragraph 1
1. "mejna vrednost" je mejna koncentracija onesnaževala v podzemni vodi, katere preseganje bi povzročilo slabo kemijsko stanje telesa ali teles podzemne vode.
1. ‘threshold value’ means a concentration limit for a pollutant in groundwater, exceedance of which would cause a body of groundwater or groundwater bodies to be characterised as having poor chemical status.
1. "standard kakovosti" je mejna koncentracija onesnaževala v podzemni vodi na osnovi koncentracij naravnega ozadja , katerih preseganje bi povzročilo slabo kemijsko stanje telesa ali teles podzemne vode
1. ‘threshold value’ means a concentration limit for a pollutant in groundwater, based on natural background concentrations, exceedance of which limit would cause a body of groundwater or groundwater bodies to be characterised as having poor chemical status.
Standardi kakovosti morajo biti povezani s koncentracijami naravnega okolja.
Threshold values should be linked to natural background concentrations.
Člen 4, pododstavek 2
Article 4, paragraph 2
Države članice bodo najkasneje 22. julija 2006 Komisiji predložile seznam vseh onesnaževal, za katere so določile mejne vrednosti .
At the latest by 22 June 2006, Member States shall provide the Commission with a list of all pollutants for which they have established threshold values .
Država članica bo za vsako onesnaževalo na seznamu zagotovila podatke, predvidene v delu B priloge III k tej direktivi.
For each pollutant on the list, Member States shall provide the information set out in part B of Annex III to this Directive.
Države članice bodo najkasneje 22. julija 2006 Komisiji predložile seznam vseh onesnaževal, katerih standard kakovosti zaradi naravne koncentracije v telesu ali skupini teles podzemne vode presega vrednosti, za katere standard kakovosti obstaja v skladu s prilogo I ali je bil določen dodaten nacionalni standard v skladu s prilogo II.
At the latest by 22 June 2006, Member States shall provide the Commission with a list of all pollutants whose threshold value, on account of their natural concentration in a body of groundwater or group of bodies of groundwater, exceeds the values for which a threshold value pursuant to Annex I exists or an additional national threshold value has been established pursuant to Annex II .
Ta stavek dopolnjuje zahtevo iz predloga spremembe 2 in dodaja potrebno določbo glede naravnih stopenj v podzemni vodi – “vrednostih ozadja”.
The sentence introduces a necessary provision concerning natural levels in groundwater - 'background values'.
Celotnega razpona različnih stopenj v Evropi ni mogoče upoštevati pri določitvi standardov kakovosti, zato je treba nakazati, kaj storiti, če naravne stopnje že presegajo standarde kakovosti.
As it is not possible for the widely differing levels which exist in Europe to be taken into account in establishing the threshold values, there is a need to indicate what is to be done if natural levels already exceed the threshold values.
V takem primeru veljajo visoke naravne stopnje v telesu ali skupini teles podzemne vode kot cilj kakovosti.
If such a case occurs in a body of groundwater or group of bodies of groundwater, the high natural levels should be taken as the threshold values.
Člen 4, odstavek 3, pododstavek 1
Article 4, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1
Komisija na podlagi podatkov, ki jih zagotovijo države članic v skladu z odstavkom 2, objavi poročilo, če je potrebno, s predlogom direktive o spremembi priloge I k tej direktivi.
On the basis of the information provided by Member States in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission shall publish a report, accompanied, if appropriate, by a proposal for a directive amending Annex I to this Directive.
Komisija na podlagi podatkov, ki jih zagotovijo države članic v skladu z odstavkom 2, pred letom 2008 objavi poročilo, če je potrebno, s predlogom direktive o spremembi priloge I k tej direktivi.
On the basis of the information provided by Member States in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission shall publish a report before 2008 accompanied, if appropriate, by a proposal for a directive amending Annex I to this Directive.
Komisiji je treba določiti rok za ukrepanje v zvezi s podatki, pridobljenimi na podlagi člena 2.
The Commission should be given a clear deadline for taking action on the information provided under paragraph 2.
Člen 4, odstavek 3, pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 4, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Poročilo analizira vsaj naslednje vidike:
The report shall at least analyse the following aspects: