natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o civilni odgovornosti in finančnih jamstvih lastnikov ladij
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o razveljavitvi uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2040/2000 o proračunski disciplini
on the proposal for a Council regulation repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 on budgetary discipline
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0488 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0448 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 37, 279 in 308 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerimi se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0277/2006 ),
– having regard to Articles 37, 279 and 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0277/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0056/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0056/2007 ),
Komisija predlaga razveljavitev uredbe Sveta št. 2040/2000 z dne 26.9.2000
The Commission is proposing that Council Regulation No 2040/2000 of 26 September 2000
Sklep Parlamenta 21.9.2000, UL C 146,
European Parliament resolution of 21 September 2000, OJ C
Komisija meni, da je ta uredba postala brezpredmetna iz naslednjih razlogov:
It contends that, for the following reasons, the regulation is no longer relevant:
· na področju kmetijstva zato, ker so bile določbe o proračunski disciplini povzete v uredbi Sveta št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike
· in agriculture because budget discipline provisions have been incorporated into Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy
Poročilo Schierhuber, UL L 248, 11.8.2005. ;
Schierhuber report, OJ L 248, 11.8.2005. , and
· na področju zunanje politike zato, ker naj bi bil vzpostavljen nov mehanizem financiranja rezerv za zavarovanje posojil za obdobje 2007-2013.
· in the foreign policy domain because a new mechanism has been established for the loan guarantee reserve for 2007-2013.
Poročevalec se strinja, da se je proračunska disciplina od sprejema uredbe št. 2040/2000/ES izboljšala z novo uredbo št. 1290/2005/ES, ker je bila določena letna zgornja meja za izdatke, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad, pri čemer so bili uporabljeni najvišji zneski za te sklade, predvideni v finančni perspektivi.
Your rapporteur agrees that, since Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 was adopted, budgetary discipline has been enhanced by a new regulation, 1290/2005, as an annual ceiling has been set for EAGGF-finance spending, the maximum financial perspective amounts for the fund having been entered.
Prav tako je uredba zagotovila spoštovanje letne zgornje meje za izdatke, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad, v vseh okoliščinah in v vseh fazah proračunskega postopka ter izvrševanja proračuna.
That regulation has also ensured that the annual ceiling for EAGGF-financed spending is observed in all circumstances and at all stages in the budget procedure and during budget implementation.
Določbe glede rezerv v zvezi z zunanjimi ukrepi
Provisions relating to reserves in connection with external actions
Prav tako je res, da je bila medtem z uredbo Sveta (ES, EURATOM) št. 89/2007 z dne 30. januarja 2007
It is equally true that, in the meantime, a legal basis has been established for the proposed mechanism for endowing the Guarantee Fund for external actions; Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 89/2007 of 30 January 2007
UL L 22, 31.1.2007. o spremembi uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2728/94 o ustanovitvi Jamstvenega sklada za zunanje ukrepe
OJ L 22, 31.1.2007. amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
Seppänenovo poročilo, resolucija Evropskega parlamenta 14. marca 2006, Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0072 . ustvarjena pravna podlaga za predlagani mehanizem financiranja jamstvenega sklada v zvezi z zunanjimi ukrepi.
Seppänen report, European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2006, Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0072 . .
Svet je 19. decembra 2006 podelil Evropski investicijski banki politični mandat za odobritev ustreznih posojil
The political mandate for the European Investment Bank to award the corresponding loans was issued by the Council on 19 December 2006
Seppänenovo poročilo, resolucija Evropskega parlamenta 30. novembra 2006. .
Seppänen report, European Parliament resolution of 30 November 2006. .
Poleg tega je bila že v letu 2002 spremenjena rezerva za pomoč v nujnih primerih tretjim državam v skladu s členom 45(1) finančne uredbe
Furthermore, the reserve for emergency aid to third states was incorporated into Article 45(1) of the Financial Regulation as long ago as 2002
Uredba št. 1605/2002 (ES), kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z uredbo št. 1995/2006, UL L 390, 30.12.2006, str.
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1995/2006, OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p.
Višino rezerve za pomoč v nujnih primerih sedaj določa medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 (točka 25).
In the meantime, the amount of the emergency aid reserve is now determined in the IIA of 17 May 2006 (paragraph 25).
Tako je zagotovljena potrebna pravna podlaga (v smislu člena 49(1) finančne uredbe in medinstitucionalnega sporazuma), zato ni možno, da bi z razveljavitvijo uredbe št. 2040/2000/ES nastala pravna vrzel.
That establishes the necessary legal basis (within the meaning of Article 49(1) of the Financial Regulation and the IIA), and there is no risk of a regulatory gap as a result of the planned repeal of Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000.
Uredba Sveta št. 2040/2000 z dne 26.9.2000 je torej v svojih bistvenih delih zastarela.
Consequently, the main components of Council Regulation No 2040/2000 have become obsolete.
Tudi z vidika boljše priprave zakonodaje je treba zastarele pravne določbe razveljaviti, da bi čim bolj zmanjšali število veljavnih določb
Outdated legislation should be repealed from a ‘better lawmaking’ perspective, too, so as to minimise the number of provisions in force
Do istega zaključka je v svojem mnenju št. 8/2006 6. decembra 2006 prišlo Računsko sodišče
The European Court of Auditors reaches the same conclusion in its Opinion No 8/2006 of 6 December 2006
UL C 8, 2.1.2007, str.
OJ C 8, 2.1.2007, p.
Zato poročevalec predlaga, da se predlog Komisije sprejme brez sprememb.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that the Commission proposal be approved unamended.
Razveljavitev uredbe (ES) št. 2040/2000 o proračunski disciplini
Repeal of Council Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 of 26 September 2000 on budgetary discipline
o socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropski uniji
on social services of general interest in the European Union
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................11
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............11
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................14
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 14
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ..........................17
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 17
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................21
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................21
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................23
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...24
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o izvajanju programa Skupnosti iz Lizbone: Socialne storitve splošnega pomena v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2006)0177 ) in delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije, priloženega omenjenemu sporočilu ( SEC(2006)0516 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication on Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: Social services of general interest in the European Union ( COM(2006)0177 ) and the accompanying Commission staff working document ( SEC(2006)0516 ),
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zlasti njenih členov 2, 5, 16, 86, 136, 137(1) (j) in (k), 143, 144 in 145,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 2, 5, 16, 86, 136, 137(1)(j) and (k), 143, 144 and 145 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, zlasti njenega člena 36,
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 36 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo in zlasti njenih členov II-94 in III-122,
– having regard to the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, and in particular Articles II-94 and III-122 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 15. novembra 2006 o skupnem stališču Sveta v zvezi s sprejetjem direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu
– having regard to its position of 15 November 2006 on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0490 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0490 . ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta 23. in 24. marca 2006 v Bruslju,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 23 and 24 March 2006,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. januarja 2004 o zeleni knjigi o storitvah splošnega pomena
– having regard to its resolution of 14 January 2004 on the Green Paper on services of general interest
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0089 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0089 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. septembra 2006 o evropskem socialnem modelu za prihodnost
– having regard to its resolution of 6 September 2006 on a European Social Model for the future
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0340 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6-TA(2006)0340 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 27. septembra 2006 o Beli knjigi Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena
– having regard to its resolution of 27 September 2006 on the Commission White Paper on services of general interest
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0380 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0380 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane, Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, Odbora za pravne zadeve in Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6-0057/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0057/2007 ),
A. ker so socialne storitve splošnega pomena eden izmed temeljnih stebrov evropskega socialnega modela in eden od poglavitnih elementov za zagotovitev socialnega miru ter gospodarske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije Evropske unije ter eden od instrumentov za dosego ciljev lizbonske strategije,
A. whereas social services of general interest (SSGIs) form one of the pillars of the European social model, play an essential part in securing civic peace and the European Union’s economic, social and territorial cohesion, and are one of the means whereby the Lisbon Strategy objectives can be achieved,
B. ker je cilj socialnih storitev splošnega pomena tudi uresničevanje skupnih vrednot, kot so socialna pravičnost, enakost, solidarnost, razvoj demokracije in svobode, na evropski ravni, ter ker je bistveni namen socialnih storitev splošnega pomena zagotoviti temeljne pravice državljanov in spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva,
B. whereas, moreover, SSGIs are designed to carry into effect values shared throughout Europe including, among others, social justice, equality, solidarity and the development of democracy and freedom, and whereas the ultimate purpose of the SSGI is to uphold citizens’ fundamental rights and respect for human dignity,
C. ker socialnih storitev splošnega pomena ne smemo obravnavati kot breme za javne organe, temveč pozitivno vplivajo na gospodarsko rast, blaginjo, zaposlovanje in socialno kohezijo,
C. whereas SSGIs should not be regarded as a burden on public authorities, because, on the contrary, they generate positive externalities in terms of economic growth, prosperity, employment and social cohesion,
D. ker se opravljanje socialnih storitev splošnega pomena odvija v dinamičnem okolju, kateremu se morajo nenehno prilagajati, da se ohranijo visoki standardi kakovosti in učinkovitosti,
D. whereas SSGIs are delivered in a changing environment to which they have to adjust constantly in order to maintain high standards of quality and efficiency,
E. ker se razpoložljivost temeljnih socialnih storitev v posameznih državah članicah precej razlikuje; ker se morajo kljub temu omenjene storitve izvajati na celotnem ozemlju Evropske unije, da se zagotovi njena ekonomska, socialna in teritorialna kohezija,
E. whereas the availability of essential social services varies considerably from one Member State to another; whereas, however, the services in question should be provided throughout the European Union’s territory in order to ensure its economic, social and territorial cohesion,
F. ker so nekateri temeljni pojmi na tem področju vsebinsko dvoumni, na primer „javna storitev“, „storitev splošnega pomena“, „storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena“ ter „socialna storitev splošnega pomena“, in ker ta dvoumnost v nedavnih aktih Skupnosti ni odpravljena, kar povzroča pravno negotovost, ki se v tem sektorju ohranja,
F. whereas some ambiguity surrounds certain basic concepts in this area, such as ‘public service’, ‘service of general interest’, ‘service of general economic interest’ and ‘social service of general interest’, and whereas that ambiguity is reflected in recent Community acts, thus contributing to the legal uncertainty prevailing in the sector,
G. ker odsotnost normativnih predpisov na tem področju omogoča široko sodno razlago, ki ni vedno dosledna; ker vsi zadevni sektorji zahtevajo jasen operativni okvir, ki čim bolj omejuje potrebo po sodni razlagi, s čimer se zagotovi čim večja pravna varnost,
G. whereas the lack of statutory regulation has given rise to a vast body of judicial interpretation, which is not always consistent; whereas all the sectors concerned are calling for a clear operating framework which reduces the need for judicial interpretation to the minimum and aims to achieve maximum legal certainty,
H. ker je zato nujno treba pojasniti zadevne pojme in pravno ureditev, v okviru katere se izvajajo socialne storitve splošnega pomena, zlasti načelo javnega pomena, pravila o konkurenci in pomoč iz javnih sredstev,
H. whereas, consequently, there is an urgent need to clarify the concepts in question and the legal framework in which SSGIs operate, and in particular to clarify the principle of 'general interest' and the rules on competition and aid from public funds,
I. ker se socialnih storitev nikakor ne sme opredeliti le kot nižje kategorizirane storitve, ki ne spadajo med poslovne storitve ali storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena; ker jih je kljub temu treba ob upoštevanju deleža družbe, kateremu so namenjene, in njihovih posebnosti z vidika ureditve, financiranja in nalog obravnavati kot posebno kategorijo storitev, ki je za družbo temeljnega pomena,
I. whereas social services must not in any circumstances be reduced to a residual category defined by the fact that they cannot be equated either with commercial services or with services of general economic interest; whereas, on the contrary, because of the sector of society whose needs they address, and the distinctive features of their organisation, funding and remit, they must be regarded as a separate and specific category of services of fundamental importance for society,
J. ker je v sektorju socialnih storitev splošnega pomena zaposlenih čedalje več ljudi, rast zaposlovanja je v tem sektorju nad povprečjem drugih sektorjev dejavnosti, v sektorju je zaposlenih veliko žensk in ker temelji na zanimivih modelih prilagodljivosti dela, kot so delo s nepolnim delovnim časom, prilagodljiv delovni čas ali prostovoljno delo, ki jih je treba spodbujati in ustrezno zaščititi v okviru delovnega prava; ker so v sektorju socialnih storitev splošnega pomena tudi zaskrbljujoči primeri negotovosti zaposlitve, ki jih je treba odpraviti,
J. whereas the SSGI sector provides employment for an increasing number of people, the rate of increase in employment in that sector is higher than the average in other sectors of the economy, a large number of women are employed in the sector, and the sector contains interesting flexible employment models, such as part-time working, 'flexitime' and voluntary work, which should be encouraged and receive adequate protection under employment law; whereas, on the other hand, the sector also presents alarming instances of job insecurity, which should be avoided,
K. ker so tudi zdravstvene storitve, ki jih sporočilo Komisije ne obravnava, socialne storitve splošnega pomena ter imajo zato enake značilnosti in cilje;ker so kljub temu pomembne njihove posebnosti z vidika zapletenosti ureditve zdravstvenih storitev in finančnega bremena za javne organe držav članic,
K. whereas health services, which are excluded from the Commission communication on SSGIs, are also SSGIs, and share the same characteristics and objectives; recognising, however, the special features arising from the complex organisation of health services and the financial burden they place on the Member States’ public authorities,
5. meni, da je napačen pristop socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, pri katerem si nasprotujejo pravila o konkurenci, javni pomoči in notranjem trgu ter koncepti javnih storitev, splošnega pomena in socialne kohezije; zato je mnenja, da jih je treba uskladiti s spodbujanjem pozitivne sinergije med gospodarskim in socialnim vidikom; vendar poudarja, da morajo biti v okviru socialnih storitev splošnega pomena pravila na področju konkurence, javne pomoči in notranjega trga združljiva z zahtevami javnih storitev, in ne obratno;
Considers that it would be a mistake to adopt an approach to SSGI which sets up a false opposition between rules on competition, public aid and the market on the one hand, and concepts of public service, general interest and social cohesion on the other; considers, on the contrary, that it is necessary to reconcile them by promoting positive synergies between the economic and social aspects; asserts, however, that in the case of SSGIs, the rules on competition, public aid and the internal market must be compatible with public service requirements, and not the other way round;
7. kljub temu meni, da je ob upoštevanju posebnosti socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, ki zadevajo njihove značilnosti in položaj njihovih uporabnikov, njihova splošna naloga in neuspeh trga pri izpolnjevanju nekaterih zahtev o zagotovitvi socialnih storitev zaščita javnega interesa – značilnosti in temeljnega elementa socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, ki mora prevladati v primeru navzkrižja;
Considers, however, in view of the particular characteristics of SSGIs, which relate to the nature of the services and the situation of those benefiting from them, their general-interest mission and the inability of the market to fulfil certain requirements in the field of social services, that, where conflict arises, priority should be given to the defence of the general interest, which is the characteristic and principal feature of the SSGIs;
9. pozdravlja namen Komisije, da nadaljuje proces poglobljenega posvetovanja, v katerem se bo pojasnilo izvajanje določenih predpisov Skupnosti na področju socialnih storitev; razen tega meni, da bi predlagani razširjeni postopek posvetovanja moral biti zaključen do sredine leta 2007 in poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje sklep o nadaljnjem spremljanju tega postopka ter opredeli najboljši pristop, obenem pa upošteva potrebo in upravičenost sektorskega zakonodajnega predloga;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to continue the consultation process in greater depth so as to clarify the application of certain Community rules for social services; takes the view, further, that the proposed extended consultation process should be completed by mid-2007 and ask the Commission to formulate a decision on how to follow up this process and identify the best approach to take, including considering the need and legitimacy of a sector-specific legislative proposal;
12. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije, da se pri opredelitvi in ureditvi socialnih storitev splošnega pomena posvetuje z vsemi interesnimi skupinami; meni, da bo tak dialog izboljšal preglednost in kakovost zadevnih storitev ter okrepil načela in vrednote, na katerih temeljijo;
Congratulates the Commission on its decision to consult all actors involved in the definition and organisation of SSGIs; believes that such dialogue will result in greater transparency and better-quality services and help to reinforce the principles and values that underpin them;
15. pozdravlja vključevanje podjetij v financiranje, podporo in zagotavljanje socialnih storitev splošnega pomena v okviru družbene odgovornosti podjetij ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v razvijanje pristopov te vrste v skladu z običaji posamezne države članice v večji meri vključijo socialne partnerje;
Welcomes the involvement of firms, in the context of fulfilling their social responsibilities, in the funding, support and delivery of SSGIs and calls on the Commission and the Member States to involve the social partners to a greater extent in developing approaches of this kind in accordance with the customs of each Member State;
17. priporoča, da se pod okriljem Evropskega parlamenta skliče forum, ki bo lahko pomagal pri vodenju tega procesa in pri katerem bodo sodelovali evropske socialne organizacije ter predstavniki Sveta in Komisije;
Recommends the convocation of a forum, under the auspices of the European Parliament, which would bring together European social organisations and representatives of the Council and the Commission to guide the way this process is handled;
Socialne storitve splošnega pomena so temeljni element evropskega socialnega modela.
Social services of general interest are a key component of the European social model.
Za zagotovitev gospodarske rasti na celotnem prostoru EU je treba oblikovati notranji trg in okrepiti zunanjo konkurenčnost, vendar je pri tem pomembno tudi, da se zagotovi učinkovito delovanje socialnih storitev po vsej Uniji.
If it is necessary to develop the internal market and strengthen external competitiveness in order to guarantee economic growth throughout the Union area, it is equally important to guarantee the proper functioning of social services throughout the Union.
To bo pomagalo zagotoviti socialno kohezijo po vsej Evropski uniji in tako konkretno uresničevati socialne razsežnosti lizbonske strategije.
This will help to guarantee social cohesion throughout the European Union and to lend practical shape to the social aspects of the Lisbon Strategy on the ground.
Demografska slika v Evropi je danes bistveno spremenjena.
Europe is now living in a demographic framework which has undergone radical change.
Zvišanje povprečne pričakovane življenjske dobe na celotnem ozemlju Unije in zmanjšanje rodnosti v večini držav članic so ustvarili bistveno drugačen socialni okvir.
The increase in average life expectancy throughout Union territory and the decline in the birth rate in the overwhelming majority of Member States have created a significantly altered social framework.
Vsi ti pojavi vplivajo na politiko na področju socialne varnosti in zaščite, medgeneracijske solidarnosti, družine, prilagodljivosti delovnega časa in udeležbe žensk na trgu delovne sile.
This process is influencing policies in the areas of social security and protection, intergenerational solidarity, family policies, flexible working time and indeed women's participation in the labour market.