natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
b) priporoča okrepljeno vlogo vodij zunanjih delegacij Komisije v tretjih državah; poziva k pripravi „večletnih strateških dokumentov po posameznih državah”, za kar bi bili odgovorni vodje delegacij, in da strateški dokumenti držav več pozornosti posvetijo položaju človekovih pravic, prepoznajo prednostne naloge in navedejo sredstva in instrumente, ki jih je uporabila EU za spoštovanje klavzule o demokraciji in dvigovanje stopnje spoštovanja temeljnih pravic; poziva tudi, da se besedila tovrstnih strategij redno preverjajo, zlasti z Evropskim parlamentom ter v njegovih zadevnih delegacijah in na plenarnih zasedanjih, zlasti o tem, kako se izvajajo; priporoča, da bi morali strateški dokumenti držav in akcijski načrti, ki jih pripravlja Komisija, vsebovati jasna merila napredka na področju človekovih pravic in časovni okvir, v katerem bi morale biti izpeljane spremembe;
(b) recommends an enhanced role for the heads of the Commission’s external delegations in third countries; calls for ‘country-by-country multiannual strategy documents’ to be drawn up under the responsibility of delegation heads, and for the Country Strategy Papers to pay greater attention to the human rights situation, identify the priorities and spell out the means and instruments deployed by the EU to ensure respect for the democracy clause and raise the level of respect for basic rights; also calls for the wording of such strategies to be reviewed on a regular basis, particularly with the European Parliament, and to be the subject of debates in the latter’s relevant delegations and in plenary, particularly with regard to their implementation; recommends that the Commission's Country Strategy Papers and Action Plans should contain clear benchmarks for progress on human rights and a timeframe within which changes should be accomplished;
c) če ena zadevnih vlad, Evropski parlament ali zadevni nacionalni parlamenti zaprosijo za prekinitev izvajanja dvostranskega sporazuma ali izvajanja drugih ustreznih ukrepov s sklicevanjem na klavzulo o demokraciji, bi moral Pridružitveni svet to razpravo samodejno uvrstiti na svoj dnevni red; ugotavlja, da je Evropski parlament glede tega že večkrat uradno izrazil svoje mnenje, vendar se Pridružitveni svet na te zahteve enostavno ni odzval;
(c) if one of the governments concerned, the European Parliament or the national parliaments concerned invokes the democracy clause to call for the suspension of a bilateral agreement or the implementation of other appropriate measures, the Association Council should automatically include that debate on its agenda; notes that the European Parliament has formally expressed its view to that effect in several cases, but that the Association Council has simply ignored those requests;
d) priporoča, da se vzpostavi „strukturiran dialog” med Pridružitvenim svetom in/ali njegovim „pododborom za človekove pravice”, Evropskim parlamentom in NVO in/ali neodvisnimi in demokratičnimi nevladnimi akterji v razpravah, povezanih s kršitvami človekovih pravic in demokratičnih klavzul v sporazumih Evropske unije, vključno s predlogi za izboljšanje izvajanja klavzule (brez izjeme);
(d) recommends the establishment of a "structured dialogue" between the Association Council and/or its "Sub-Committee on Human Rights", the European Parliament and NGOs and/or independent and democratic non-State actors in discussions relating to breaches of human rights and democracy clauses in European Union Agreements, including proposals for improving implementation of the clause (excluding none);
e) obžaluje, da Evropski parlament ni vključen v postopku odločanja, ki zadeva pričetek posvetovanja ali zamrznitev nekega sporazuma; zato odločno vztraja tako pri potrebi po soodločanju s Komisijo in Svetom v tem sektorju, kot pri odločitvi za zamrznitev morebitnih ustreznih negativnih ukrepov, ki so že bili vsiljeni neki državi („zamrznitev prekinitve”);
(e) regrets the fact that the European Parliament is not involved in the decision-making process for initiating consultation or suspending an agreement; strongly insists, therefore, on the need for it to be a joint decision-maker with the Commission and the Council in this respect, and likewise with regard to the decision to suspend any appropriate negative measures already imposed on a country ('suspension of the suspension');
f) predlaga, da Komisija skupaj s pododbori za človekove pravice sestavi letno poročilo, o katerem bo razpravljal Evropski parlament, o uporabi klavzul o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v veljavnih mednarodnih sporazumih, ki bo vsebovalo analizo po posamičnih primerih vsakega postopka posvetovanja in drugih ustreznih ukrepov, ki jih je v tistem letu Svet začel ali zavrnil, spremljajo pa naj ga podrobna priporočila in ocene glede učinkovitosti in usklajenosti sprejetih ukrepov;
(f) proposes that an annual report be drawn up by the Commission, together with subcommittees on human rights, and debated in the European Parliament, on the application of the human rights and democracy clauses in international agreements in force, containing a case-by-case analysis of each consultation process and other appropriate measures initiated or refused by the Council that year and accompanied by detailed recommendations and an evaluation dealing with the effectiveness and coherence of the action taken;
14. poziva, da se Evropski parlament poveže s Pridružitvenimi sveti in pododbori za človekove pravice, in da medparlamentarne delegacije Evropskega parlamenta na tem področju pridobijo okrepljeno vlogo ter da se v dnevnih redih brez izjeme predvidijo njihovi obiski za razpravo o klavzuli;
Calls for the European Parliament to be associated with the Association Councils and with the subcommittees on human rights, and for the European Parliament’s interparliamentary delegations to have an enhanced role in this connection and to invariably provide in the agendas for their visits for discussions on the clause;
16. poudarja, da se ne sme prenehati z izvajanjem nobenega ukrepa dokler obstajajo razlogi za njegovo uporabo in poziva k vpeljavi dodatnih ukrepov, če obstoječi ukrepi po daljšem obdobju niso prinesli rezultatov;
Stresses that no measure may be lifted until the reasons for its application have ceased to exist, and calls for the introduction of additional measures if existing measures have not yielded results after a considerable period;
glede klavzule o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v sporazumih EU
on the human rights and democracy clause in EU agreements
1. opozarja na univerzalnost in nedeljivost človekovih pravic in soodvisnost med spoštovanjem človekovih pravic, demokracijo in razvojem;
Points out that human rights are universal and indivisible and that democracy, development and the upholding of human rights are interdependent;
3. poudarja, da splošna deklaracija o človekovih pravicah in mednarodni pakt o državljanskih in političnih pravicah pozivata k izvedbi svobodnih in pravičnih volitev, ki bi odražale svobodno voljo prebivalstva in k zagotavljanju temeljnih pravic;
3 Stresses that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Pact on Civil and Political Rights call for the holding of free and fair elections embodying the free expression of the will of the people and for the upholding of fundamental rights;
9. poziva k bolj odprtim postopkom pri pogajanjih o sporazumih in to preko okrepljenega sodelovanja Evropskega parlamenta in civilne družbe;
Calls for a more open procedure in the negotiation phase of agreements, with greater participation of the European Parliament and civil society;
13. izrecno poziva regionalne organizacije in države v razvoju ter druge tretje države, s katerimi ima EU sklenjene sporazume, da si z vsemi močmi prizadevajo za dobro vodenje, transparentnost in boj proti korupciji, demokracijo, pravno državo, spoštovanje človekovih pravic ter gospodarski razvoj, brez česar bi bili vsi napori za odpravo revščine popolnoma nekoristni;
Urges regional organisations and developing countries, as well as other third countries with which the EU has agreements, to commit themselves unreservedly to good governance, to transparency and to the fight against corruption, to democracy, to constitutional government, to the upholding of human rights and to economic progress, which are all essential if action taken to eradicate poverty is to be of any benefit;
- da izrecno navaja mednarodne dogovore o spoštovanju človekovih pravic kot poglavitne elemente sporazuma ter vsebuje odložilno klavzulo v primeru kršitev, in sicer po zaključku postopka posvetovanja (člen 96), v sklopu katerega lahko vsaka stran predstavi svoje stališče in poskuša najti rešitev, s katero bi se lahko izognili sankcijam,
- the fact that it contains an explicit reference to international human-rights commitments as essential components of the Agreement and contains a clause whereby in the event of any infringement the Agreement may be suspended following a consultation procedure (Article 96) during which each of the parties may put forward its point of view and try to reach a solution other than sanctions,
- da velja za 78 držav, ki so v veliki države nečlanice EU, s katerimi ima EU sklenjene sporazume,
- the fact that it is applicable to 78 countries - hence to most of the non-EU countries with which the European Union has concluded agreements,
– da je edini sporazum, ki je sprožil sankcije in ki sorazmerno dobro deluje;
- the fact that it is the only agreement to have led to sanctions and to have functioned relatively well;
20. meni, da morajo države AKP biti še naprej pozorne, da odkrijejo vsak primer kršitve človekovih pravic v zgodnji fazi; prav tako meni, da morajo države pri odkrivanju in zasledovanju primerov kršitev človekovih pravic ukrepati na lastno pobudo;
Considers that the ACP countries must remain alert in order to detect at an early stage any cases of human-rights violation; considers, furthermore, that those countries should act on their own initiative in identifying and punishing cases of human-rights violation;
Klavzula o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v sporazumih EU
Human rights and democracy clause in EU agreements
o klavzuli o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v sporazumih Evropske unije
on The Human Rights and Democracy Clause in European Union agreements
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino poziva Odbor za zunanje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
5. v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, da v polni meri vključi Parlament v ocenjevanje izvajanja klavzul o človekovih pravicah ali podobnih zahtev v zvezi s spoštovanjem osnovnih demokratičnih standardov, človekovih pravic in pravic manjšin, ki so vključene v takšne sporazume; in poudarja pomen, ki ga ima v procesu takšnega ocenjevanja in za boljše nadzorovanje razmer na področju človekovih pravic posvetovanje s civilno družbo;
Calls, in this regard, on the Commission to involve Parliament fully in the assessment of the implementation of human rights clauses or similar requirements of compliance with basic democratic standards and respect for human and minority rights incorporated in such agreements; and emphasises the importance of consulting civil society in this assessment process so as to improve the monitoring of the human rights situation;
7. priporoča Komisiji, naj oblikuje objektivno in pregledno metodologijo, ki bo jasno izkazovala povezavo med spoštovanjem človekovih pravic v tretjih državah in temu primernim odzivom Skupnosti;
Recommends that the Commission develop an objective and transparent methodology that spells out the exact relationship between third countries' compliance with human rights standards and the appropriate Community response;
Klavzula o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v sporazumih Evropske unije
The Human Rights and Democracy Clause in European Union agreements
o skupnem besedilu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju določene socialne zakonodaje v zvezi s cestnim prometom in spremembi Uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 3821/85 in (ES) št. 2135/98 ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3820/85, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor in zadevne izjave Komisije (PE-CONS 3671/2005 – C6‑0416/2005 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee and the relevant Commission statement (PE-CONS 3671/2005 – C6‑0416/2005 ),
17. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2001)0573 )
17. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2001)0573 )
UL C 51 E, 26.2.2002, str.
OJ C 51 E, 26.2.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga k predlogu Komisije ( KOM(2003)0490 )
– having regard to the amended proposal to the Commission proposal ( COM(2003)0490 )
Besedila, sprejeta 13.4.2005, P6_TA(2005)0122 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts Adopted, 13.4.2005, P6_TA(2005)0122 . on the Council common position
UL C 63 E, 15.3.2005, str.
OJ C 63 E, 15.3.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2005)0301 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2005)0301 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 65 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 65 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6‑0006/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0006/2006 ),
Skupno besedilo Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju določene socialne zakonodaje v zvezi s cestnim prometom in spremembi Uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 3821/85 in (ES) št. 2135/98 ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3820/85, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85
člen 251(5) in člen 71 ES
Articles 251(5) and 71 EC
Predsednik/-ca delegacije: podpredsednik/-ca
Delegation chairman: Vice-President
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju določene socialne zakonodaje v zvezi s cestnim prometom – KOM(2001)0573 – C5-0485/2001
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport – COM(2001)0573 – C5-0485/2001
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o licencah za kontrolo zračnega prometa v Skupnosti
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community Air Traffic Controller Licence
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (10724/2/2005 – C6‑0399/2005 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (10724/2/2005 – C6‑0399/2005 ),
UL C 320 E, 15.12.2005, str.
OJ C320, 15.12.2005, p.
50. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0473 )
50 on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0473 )
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0293 )
– having regard to the Commission amended proposal ( COM(2005)0293
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0007/2006 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0007/2006 ),
The draft directive aims to harmonise provisions on training and licensing air-traffic controllers and to facilitate the mutual recognition of national licences.
The draft directive aims to harmonise provisions on training and licensing air-traffic controllers and to facilitate the mutual recognition of national licences.
This proposal forms part of the legislation to create a single and complete European sky.
This proposal is the final part of the legislation to create a single European sky.
To this end, four regulations were adopted in 2004, fundamentally changing the air-traffic control sector and covering the institutional, economic, technical and social aspects of the ‘Single European Sky’ package.
To this end, four regulations were adopted in 2004, fundamentally changing the air-traffic management sector and covering the institutional, economic, technical and social aspects of the ‘Single European Sky’ package.
This draft directive, following the Commission's explanatory statement, helps to maintain the balance between the various aspects of the ‘Single European Sky’ package, provides an opportunity to re-examine or reinforce the safety aspects of air traffic control, facilitates the creation of functional crossborder airspace blocks and creates a level playing field for training services in the EU.
This draft directive, according to the Commission's explanatory statement, helps to maintain the balance between the various aspects of the ‘Single European Sky’ package, provides an opportunity to revise or reinforce the safety aspects of air traffic management, facilitates the establishment of cross-border functional airspace blocks and creates a level playing field for training services in the EU.
It also facilitates mobility of air-traffic controllers and provision of crossborder air-traffic control services.
It also facilitates mobility of air-traffic controllers and provision of cross-border air-traffic control services.
The Commission considers that this directive should be based on existing international laws, such as those of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), particularly concerning language requirements, and of Eurocontrol.
The Commission considers that this directive should be based on existing international laws, such as those of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), particularly concerning language requirements, and of Eurocontrol.
The directive transposes these requirements into Community law.
The directive transposes these requirements into Community law.
These are the key elements of the proposal, thus opening the way to introducing a Community licence.
These are the key elements of the proposal, thus opening the way to introducing a Community licence.
On 8 March 2005 Parliament adopted its position at first reading with 21 amendments.
On 8 March 2005 Parliament adopted its position at first reading with 21 amendments.
Following the vote in the Plenary and informal negotiations between Parliament, the Commission and the Council, a compromise was agreed between the three Institutions.
Following the vote in the Plenary and informal negotiations between Parliament, the Commission and the Council, a compromise was agreed between the three Institutions.
On 24 June 2005 the chairman of Parliament's Committee on Transport wrote to the Council undertaking to recommend that Parliament approve this text without amendment at second reading.
On 24 June 2005 the chairman of Parliament's Committee on Transport wrote to the Council undertaking to recommend that Parliament approve this text without amendment at second reading.
On 14 November 2005 the Council adopted its common position, which is similar to the compromise negotiated with Parliament.
On 14 November 2005 the Council adopted its common position, which is similar to the compromise negotiated with Parliament.
The substance of the common position is identical with the compromise; its form has been slightly changed by the lawyer linguists.
The substance of the common position is identical with the compromise; its form has been slightly changed by the lawyer linguists.
These minor changes are entirely acceptable and do not call into question the agreement reached between the three Institutions.
These minor changes are entirely acceptable and do not call into question the agreement reached between the three Institutions.
The Commission considered that the common position adopted on 14 November 2005 did not change the objectives and approach of its initial proposal and is therefore able to endorse it, particularly as the common position takes account of the amendments proposed by Parliament at first reading and of the Commission's modified proposal.
The Commission considered that the common position adopted on 14 November 2005 did not change the objectives and approach of its initial proposal and is therefore able to endorse it, particularly as the common position takes account of the amendments proposed by Parliament at first reading and of the Commission's amended proposal.
The main changes to the Commission proposal concern the following points:
The main changes to the Commission proposal concern the following points:
The impact of the directive on civilian air traffic controlled by service providers working mainly in the area of military air traffic has been redefined to bring to its approach into line with that adopted under the legislation concerning the Single European Sky.
The impact of the directive on civilian air traffic controlled by service providers working mainly in the area of military air traffic has been redefined to bring to its approach into line with that adopted under the legislation concerning the Single European Sky.
Social issues
Social issues
The recitals have been used to clarify, in response to concerns expressed by Parliament, that the directive will have no effect on existing national provisions governing the working relationship between controllers and their employers and that the adoption of new implementation measures will involve consultation of the social partners at European level.
The recitals have been used to clarify, in response to concerns expressed by Parliament, that the directive will have no effect on existing national provisions governing the employment relationship between controllers and their employers and that the adoption of new implementation measures will involve consultation of the social partners at European level.
Although the basic requirement proposed by the Commission for operational language proficiency (level 4) has been retained (for English, and for a local language when the Member States consider it necessary for safety reasons), the common position, following Parliament's wishes, also allows the Member States to require advanced proficiency (level 5) for imperative safety reasons.
Although the basic requirement proposed by the Commission for operational language proficiency (level 4) has been retained (for English, and for a local language when the Member States consider it necessary for safety reasons), the common position, following Parliament's wishes, also allows the Member States to require advanced proficiency (level 5) for imperative safety reasons.
Improvement of mutual recognition
Improvement of mutual recognition
licences and all qualifications, diplomas, language diplomas and medical certificates associated clearly a subject to the principle of unconditional mutual recognition.
Licences and all qualifications, certificates of qualifications, language certificates and associated medical certificates are clearly subject to the principle of unconditional mutual recognition.
Furthermore, the license holder carrying out his activity in a member state other than that in which the license was issued as the right to exchange is license against the license issued by the member state in which he is working.
Furthermore, a licence holder working in a Member State other than the country where the licence was issued has the right to exchange his or her licence for a licence issued by the Member State in which he or she is working.
Roles of the national supervisory authorities when several states are concerned
Roles of the national supervisory authorities when several states are concerned