natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zadnji pododstavek bi moral postati samostojen odstavek člena 12.
This last subparagraph should become a separate paragraph of Article 12.
Treba je tudi pojasniti, da upravljavec ali poveljnik ne moreta biti odgovorna, če vkrcevalec priskrbi nenatančne ali zavajajoče informacije o tovoru.
It also needs to be made clear that the operator or master cannot be held responsible if the shipper provides inaccurate or misleading information about the cargo.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 4 A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 4 A (new)
Člen 14, odstavek 2, točka (c) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 14, paragraph 2, point (c) (Directive 2002/59/EG)
(4a) V drugem odstavku člena 14 se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
(4a) In the second paragraph of Article 14, point (c) shall be replaced by the following:
"(c) vsaka država članica mora imeti možnost, da nemudoma pošlje informacije o ladji in o nevarnem ali onesnaževalnem blagu na njej pristojnemu organu druge države članice.
“(c) each Member State must be able, upon request, to send information on the ship and the dangerous or polluting goods on board without delay to the competent authority of another Member State .
To ne sme voditi do rutinskih zahtev držav članic po informacijah o ladjah in njihovem tovoru, razen če gre za pomorsko varnost, zaščito ali varstvo morskega okolja.”
This must not lead to Member States routinely requesting information on ships and their cargoes for purposes other than maritime safety or security or the protection of the maritime environment.”
Ni dovolj jasnosti glede uporabnosti tega člena veljavne direktive 2002/59/ES.
There is some lack of clarity on the applicability of this article of the current Directive 2002/59/EC.
Cilj tega predloga spremembe je razjasniti, da namen ni ta, da bi morale ladje same po sebi razkriti te informacije, ter da je to potrebno le, če to zahtevajo razmere.
This amendment seeks to make clear that it is not the intention that ships should disclose this information as a matter of course, and that this is only necessary if the situation calls for it.
Člen 18a, odstavek 1, točka b (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 18a, paragraph 1, point (b) (Directive 2002/59/EG)
(b) lahko zahtevajo, da so ladje, ki se nahajajo v zadevnih območjih in ki želijo vpluti v pristanišče ali terminal ali izpluti iz njega ali zapustiti območje zasidranja, v skladu z zahtevami trdnosti in moči, ki ustrezajo razmeram ledu v zadevnem območju.
(b) they may request that a ship which is in the area concerned, and intends to enter or leave a port or terminal or to leave an anchorage area, satisfy the strength and power requirements commensurate with the ice situation in the area concerned.
(b) lahko zahtevajo, da ladje, ki se nahajajo v zadevnih območjih in ki želijo vpluti v pristanišče ali terminal ali izpluti iz njega ali zapustiti območje zasidranja, lahko dokumentirajo, da so v skladu z zahtevami trdnosti in moči, ki ustrezajo razmeram ledu v zadevnem območju.
(b) they may request that a ship which is in the area concerned, and intends to enter or leave a port or terminal or to leave an anchorage area, can document that it satisfies the strength and power requirements commensurate with the ice situation in the area concerned.
Organom ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno ladjam preprečevati vstop ali izstop iz pristanišč itd. na podlagi samovoljnih odločitev.
Authorities should not be allowed to ban ships from entering or leaving ports etc. on grounds of arbitrary judgement.
Da bi to zagotovili, bi morala biti dokumentacija dovolj.
Documentation should be sufficient to ensure this.
Člen 20, odstavek 1 (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20, paragraph 1 (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Države članice zagotovijo, da se ob upoštevanju rezultatov ocene razmer, opravljene na podlagi načrta iz člena 20a, ladje v stiski sprejmejo v pribežališče, ki omogoča omejitev tveganja, ki ga povzroča njihov položaj.
Member States shall ensure that, subject to the results of the assessment of the situation carried out on the basis of the plan referred to in Article 20a, ships in distress are admitted to a place of refuge which makes it possible to limit the threat posed by their situation.
Vsaka država članica določi pristojni organ, ki ima zahtevano znanje in je neodvisen ter ima pooblastila, da v času reševalne akcije na lastno pobudo sprejema odločitve o sprejemu ladij v stiski z namenom:
Each Member State shall designate a competent authority which has the required expertise and is independent in that it has the power, at the time of the rescue operation, to take decisions on its own initiative concerning the accommodation of ships in distress with a view to:
- zaščititi človeška življenja
- the protection of human lives
- zaščititi obalo
- coastal protection
- zaščititi morsko okolje
- the protection of the marine environment
- varnosti na morju
- safety at sea
- zmanjšanja gospodarske škode
- minimising economic damage.
Ta predlog spremembe želi razjasniti obseg, v katerem mora biti pristojni organ neodvisen in kakšne so njegove druge naloge poleg odločanja, ali se ladjo sprejme v pribežališče (glej člen 20(2)(a)(novo).
This amendment seeks to make clear the extent to which the competent authority needs to be independent and what its other tasks are over and above the decision to accommodate a ship in a place of refuge (see Article 20(2) a (new)).
Veliko teh nalog je naštetih v neizčrpnem seznamu v prilogi IV veljavne direktive o nadzoru 2002/59/ES.
Many of these tasks are set out in the non-exhaustive list in Annex IV of the current monitoring directive 2002/59/EC.
Poročevalec meni, da bi bilo bolje, če bi bil ta seznam vključen v ta člen.
Your rapporteur considers it desirable that this list be incorporated into this article.
Člen 20, odstavek 1 a (novo) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20, paragraph 1 a (new) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Organ iz odstavka 1 lahko med drugim:
The authority referred to in paragraph 1 may, inter alia :
(a) omeji gibanje ladje ali jo usmeri na določeno pot.
(a) restrict the movement of the ship or direct it to follow a specific course.
Ta zahteva ne vpliva na odgovornost poveljnika za varno upravljanje ladje;
This requirement does not affect the master's responsibility for the safe handling of his ship;
(b) na poveljnika ladje naslovi uradni opomin, naj se preneha z grožnjo okolju ali pomorski varnosti;
(b) give official notice to the master of the ship to put an end to the threat to the environment or maritime safety;
(c) stopi na ladjo ali nanjo pošlje ocenjevalno skupino, ki oceni škodo na ladji in stopnjo tveganja, pomaga poveljniku, da uredi razmere ter sproti obvešča pristojno obalno postajo;
(c) come aboard or send an evaluation team aboard the ship to assess the damage to the ship and the degree of risk, help the master to remedy the situation and keep the competent coastal station informed;
(d) zahteva reševalce in jih odpošlje, kamor je potrebno;
(d) call on and deploy rescue workers itself where necessary;
(e) naroči, da se ladjo krmari ali vleče.
(e) cause the ship to be piloted or towed.
Glej predlog spremembe poročevalca k členu 20(1).
See rapporteur’s amendment to Article 20(1).
Člen 20, odstavek 2 (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20, paragraph 2 (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Za sprejem ladje v stiski v pribežališče je potrebna predhodna ocena razmer in odločitev, ki jo sprejme neodvisni pristojni organ, ki ga imenuje država članica.
The accommodation of a ship in distress in a place of refuge shall be the subject of a prior assessment of the situation and a decision taken by an independent competent authority designated by the Member State .
Organ iz odstavka 1 prevzame odgovornost za izvedbo načrtov iz člena 20a.
The authority referred to in paragraph 1 shall assume responsibility for the execution of the plans referred to in Article 20a.
Člen 20, odstavek 2 a (novo) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20, paragraph 2 a (new) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Na podlagi predhodne ocene okoliščin, organ iz prvega odstavka odloči glede sprejema ladje v stiski v pribežališče.
On the basis of a preliminary assessment of the circumstances, the authority referred to in paragraph 1 shall decide on the accommodation of a ship in distress in a place of refuge.
Na podlagi ocene okoliščin v skladu z načrti iz člena 20a pristojni organ iz prvega odstavka zagotovi, da so ladje v stiski sprejete v pribežališče v vseh primerih, če sprejem omogoča omejitev tveganja, ki ga povzroča njihov položaj.
The authority referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure that, based on an assessment of the circumstances in accordance with the plans referred to in Article 20a, ships in distress are admitted to a place of refuge in all cases where the accommodation of the ship in distress in a place of refuge permits the risks associated with those circumstances to be reduced.
Poročevalec meni, da je ladje v stiski treba sprejeti v pribežališče v vseh primerih, ko se lahko omeji tveganje in škoda.
Your rapporteur considers that in all cases where the risks and damage can be limited by admitting a ship in distress to a place of refuge, this should be done.
Vseeno pa bi v majhnem številu primerov, na primer, ko grozi eksplozija, posledice takšne eksplozije na odprtem morju predstavljale veliko manjšo grožnjo za človeška življenja in okolje kot pa eksplozija v pribežališču.
In a small number of cases, however, such as when there is a danger of explosion, the consequences of an explosion on the open sea would pose a much less serious threat to human life and the environment than an explosion in a place of refuge.
Zato ne smemo domnevati, da je sprejem v pribežališče avtomatično najboljša rešitev.
We must not therefore assume that admission to a place of refuge is automatically the best solution.
Člen 20, odstavek 2 b (novo) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20, paragraph 2 b (new) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Države članice pri obravnavanju posadke ladje v stiski v vodah pod njihovo jurisdikcijo upoštevajo smernice IMO o pravičnem ravnanju z mornarji ob pomorski nesreči.
Member States shall respect the IMO Guidelines on the fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime accident in relation to the crew of a ship in distress in the waters under their jurisdiction.
Te smernice je nedavno sprejel pravni odbor IMO in bodo v juniju predložene MOD v sprejem.
These guidelines were recently adopted by the IMO Legal Committee and will be submitted in June for adoption by the ILO.
Nastale so kot odgovor na vse pogostejše obravnavanje kapitanov in posadk ladij kot kriminalcev.
They were drawn up in response to the growing tendency to treat ships’ masters and crews as criminals.
Kapitana tankerjev Erika in Prestige sta bila aretirana brez dokazov o napačnem ravnanju.
The masters of both the Erika and the Prestige were arrested without any proof of wrongdoing.
Strah pred aretacijo včasih povzroči, da kapitani v primeru nesreče peljejo poškodovano ladjo v vode druge države članice, kar pa lahko povzroči večjo škodo na ladji.
The fear of arrest sometimes leads the master of a ship, in the event of an accident at sea, to bring his damaged ship into the waters of another Member State, which risks causing greater damage to the ship.
Člen 20a odstavek 1 (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20a, paragraph 1 (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Države članice izdelajo načrte, da bi se odzvale na tveganja, ki jih povzročajo ladje v stiski, ki se nahajajo v vodah pod njihovo jurisdikcijo.
Member States shall draw up plans for responding to threats presented by ships in distress in the waters under their jurisdiction.
Države članice izdelajo načrte, da bi se odzvale na tveganja, ki jih povzročajo ladje v stiski, ki se nahajajo v vodah pod njihovo jurisdikcijo , ter da bi varno sprejele ladje in zavarovale človeška življenja.
Member States shall draw up plans for responding to threats presented by ships in distress in the waters under their jurisdiction and for securing the accommodation of ships and the protection of human lives .
Pomembno je poudariti, da ni pomemben le sprejem ladje, ampak tudi, in najprej, reševanje človeških življenj (potnikov in posadke).
It is important to stress that what is at issue here is not just the accommodation of the ship but also and most importantly the saving of human lives (passengers and crew).
Člen 20a, odstavek 3, pododstavek 2 a (novo) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20a, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 a (new) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Osebe, ki prejmejo ustrezne informacije v skladu s tem odstavkom o načrtih za ravnanje v sili in pribežališčih, morajo zagotoviti zaupnost teh informacij.
Persons receiving relevant information pursuant to this paragraph concerning emergency plans and places of refuge must guarantee the confidentiality of such information.
Zagotoviti moramo, da do teh podatkov dostopajo le organi, ki jih res potrebujejo, in da z njimi ravnajo zelo previdno ter spoštujejo njihovo zaupnost.
We need to ensure that this information is available only to those authorities which genuinely need it, and that such authorities treat such information very carefully and respect its confidentiality.
Člen 20b, naslov (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20b, title (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Finančna jamstva
Financial guarantees
Finančna jamstva in nadomestila
Financial guarantees and compensation
Člen 20b, odstavek 1 (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20b, paragraph 1 (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Pred sprejemom ladje v stiski v pribežališče lahko država članica zahteva, da upravljavec, agent ali poveljnik ladje predloži potrdilo o zavarovanju ali finančnem jamstvu v smislu člena X Direktive XX/XXXX/ES [o civilni odgovornosti in finančnih jamstvih lastnikov ladij], ki krije njegovo odgovornost za škodo, ki jo povzroči ladja.
Prior to accommodating a ship in distress in a place of refuge, the Member State may request the ship’s operator, agent or master to present an insurance certificate or a financial guarantee, within the meaning of Article X of Directive XX/XXXX/EC [on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners], covering his liability for damage caused by the ship.
Poročevalec predlaga zamenjavo prvega in drugega odstavka, kar bi poudarilo, da je potrebno ladjam v stiski pomagati in jih sprejeti, tudi če niso zavarovane.
Your rapporteur proposes swapping the positions of paragraphs 1 and 2, thereby emphasising that the absence of insurance does not mean that a ship in distress need not be assisted or accommodated.
Reševanje človeških življenj in/ali preprečitev okoljskih katastrof mora imeti prednost v vsakem primeru, tudi če ladja nima urejenih dokumentov ali ni zavarovana.
Saving human lives and/or preventing an environmental disaster must take precedence at any event, even if the ship’s papers are not in order or it has no insurance.
Člen 20b, odstavek 2 (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20b, paragraph 2 (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Države članice morajo predhodno oceno in odločitev iz člena 20 opraviti oziroma izdati tudi, če potrdilo o zavarovanju ali finančno jamstvo ne obstaja.
The absence of an insurance certificate or financial guarantee shall not exonerate the Member States from the prior assessment and decision referred to in Article 20.
Brez poseganja v prvi odstavek lahko država članica pred sprejemom ladje v stiski v pribežališče zahteva, da upravljavec, agent ali poveljnik ladje predloži potrdilo o zavarovanju ali finančnem jamstvu v smislu člena X Direktive XX/XXXX/ES [o civilni odgovornosti in finančnih jamstvih lastnikov ladij], ki krije njegovo odgovornost za škodo, ki jo povzroči ladja.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, when accommodating a ship in distress in a place of refuge, the Member State may request the ship’s operator, agent or master to present an insurance certificate or a financial guarantee, within the meaning of Article 7 of Directive XX/XXXX/EC [on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners], covering his liability for damage caused by the ship.
Zahteva po tem potrdilu ne sme povzročiti nobenih zamud pri sprejemu ladje v stiski.
The act of requesting this certificate shall not lead to a delay in accommodating a ship in distress.
Država članica lahko kadarkoli zahteva potrdilo ali dokazilo o zavarovanju za lastno dokumentacijo.
A Member State may at any event request a certificate or proof of insurance to complete its records.
Kljub temu pa ta zahteva ne sme povzročiti zamud pri reševalni operaciji.
However, requesting such certificate must not delay the rescue operation.
Člen 20b, odstavek 2 a (novo) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20b, paragraph 2 a (new) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Države članice zagotovijo povračilo stroškov in možne gospodarske škode, ki ju utrpi pristanišče zaradi odločitve, sprejete v skladu z odstavkom 2a člena 20, če teh stroškov ali škode v razumnem času ne povrne lastnik ali upravljavec ladje v skladu direktivo XX/XXXX/ES o civilni odgovornosti in finančnih jamstvih lastnikov ladij in z obstoječimi mednarodnimi mehanizmi za nadomestilo.
Member States shall ensure the reimbursement of costs and potential economic damage suffered by a port as a result of a decision taken pursuant to Article 20 paragraph 2a if such costs or damage are not reimbursed within a reasonable time by the owner or operator of the ship pursuant to Directive XX/XXXX/EC on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners and the existing international compensation mechanisms.
Sprejem ladje lahko povzroči škodo in stroške v pristanišču.
The accommodation of a ship may lead to damage and costs for a port.
Parlament je že večkrat zahteval, naj se sestavi načrt za povračilo škode pristaniščem in pribežališčem.
Parliament has on several occasions called for a [compensation] scheme for ports and places of refuge.
Komisija predlaga, da se ta tema obravnava v naslednji direktivi o civilni odgovornosti in finančnih jamstvih lastnikov ladij.
The Commission proposes to address this issue in the forthcoming Directive on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners.
Kljub temu pa v določenih primerih ta direktiva ter obstoječi skladi in konvencije (večina jih še ni v veljavi) ne nadomestijo finančnih izgub pristanišč.
However, in certain cases this directive and the existing funds and conventions (most of which have not yet taken effect) do not compensate for the financial losses of a port.
Poročevalec poziva k sestavi načrta za povračilo škode za izjemne primere.
Your rapporteur calls for a compensation scheme to cover these exceptional cases.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 11
ARTICLE 1, POINT 11
Člen 20a, odstavek 3 a (novo) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 20a, paragraph 3 a (new) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Pri sodelovanju znotraj regionalnih dogovorov ali v okviru čezmejnih, medregionalnih ali transnacionalnih projektov države članice zagotovijo, da razviti informacijski sistemi ali omrežja ustrezajo zahtevam te direktive ter so združljivi in povezani z evropskim sistemom za pomorske informacije in upravljanje SafeSeaNet.
When cooperating within regional agreements or in the framework of cross-border, inter-regional or transnational projects, Member States shall ensure that information systems or networks developed comply with the requirements of this Directive and are compatible with and connected to with the European maritime information and management system SafeSeaNet.
Namen tega predloga spremembe je omejiti tveganje, da bi se razvijali lokalni dogovori med pomorskimi upravami ali pobude za sodelovanje med regijami/pristanišči/občinami več držav članic v istem morskem območju brez primernega upoštevanja potrebe po združljivosti in medobratovalnosti sistemov po vsej Evropi ter omrežja SafeSeaNet.
The aim of this amendment is to limit the risk that local or regional agreements between maritime administrations or cooperation initiatives between regions/ports/municipalities of several Member States in the same sea area are being developed without a proper consideration of the need of compatibility and interoperability between such systems throughout Europe and with the SafeSeaNet network.
Člen 22a, odstavek 3 b (novo) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 22a, paragraph 3 b (new) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
Da bi zagotovili dovolj časa za preskus delovanja evropskega sistema za izmenjavo pomorskih informacij SafeSeaNet, le-ta začne v polnosti delovati 1. januarja 2009.
To ensure that there is a sufficient period to test the functioning of the European maritime information exchange system SafeSeaNet, it shall become fully operational on 1 January 2009.
Nujno je treba zagotoviti dovolj časa, da države članice preskusijo delovanje sistema SafeSeaNet, če naj bodo nacionalni in lokalni sistemi združljivi z njim.
It is essential to provide a sufficient period for the Member States to test the operation of the SafeSeaNet if national and local systems are to comply with it.
ČLEN 1, ODSTAVEK 12, TOČKA (B)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 12, POINT (B)
Člen 23, točki e in f (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 23, points (e) and (f) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
(b) dodata se naslednji točki (e) in (f):
(b) the following points (e) and (f) are added:
(b) dodajo se naslednje točke (e) , (f) in (f a) :
(b) the following points (e) , (f) and (fa) are added:
Tradicionalno je zaupnost glede ribolovnih območij temeljnega pomena za ribiško floto in jo je treba zagotoviti, da ne bi kršili evropske zakonodaje na tem področju.
The confidentiality of fishing locations has traditionally been crucial for the fishing fleet and must be guaranteed under the relevant European legislation.
Člen 23, točka e (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 23, point (e) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
"(e) zagotoviti medsebojno povezavo in interoperabilnost nacionalnih sistemov, ki se uporabljajo za upravljanje informacij iz Priloge, razviti in posodobiti sistem SafeSeaNet;
"(e) ensuring the interconnection and interoperability of the national systems used for managing the information referred to in the Annex, and developing and updating the SafeSeaNet system;
"(e) zagotoviti medsebojno povezavo in interoperabilnost nacionalnih sistemov in povezati konvencionalne in satelitske sisteme , ki se uporabljajo za upravljanje informacij iz Priloge, razviti in posodobiti sistem SafeSeaNet;
"(e) ensuring the interconnection and interoperability of the national systems and integrating conventional with satellite- based systems used for managing the information referred to in the Annex, and developing and updating the SafeSeaNet system;
Vse sedanje in bodoče tehnologije bi morale biti povezane, da bi bil sistem SafeSeaNet kar najboljši.
All present and future technologies should be integrated for obtaining the best possible SafeSeaNet system.
Člen 23, točka f (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 23, point (f) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
(f) preučiti izvedljivost in opredeliti načine združevanja sistemov samodejnega prepoznavanja (AIS) s sistemi za določanje položaja in sporočanje, ki se uporabljajo v okviru skupne ribiške politike.“
(f) studying the feasibility and determining the detailed rules for integrating automatic identification systems (AIS) with the positioning and communication systems used in the context of the common fisheries policy.”
(f) preučiti izvedljivost in opredeliti načine združevanja sistemov samodejnega prepoznavanja (AIS) s sistemi za določanje položaja in sporočanje, ki se uporabljajo v okviru skupne ribiške politike.
(f) studying the feasibility and determining the detailed rules for integrating automatic identification systems (AIS) with the positioning and communication systems used in the context of the common fisheries policy.
Ugotovitve te študije morajo biti na voljo najkasneje dvanajst mesecev pred začetkom veljavnosti te direktive.
The findings of that study shall be made available at the latest twelve months before the entry into force of this Directive.
Člen 23, točka f a (novo) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 23, point (f a) (new) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
(fa) preučiti in pričeti izvajati postopke, ki bodo bolj učinkovito zagotavljali zaupnost zbranih podatkov."
(fa) studying and implementing procedures that will more effectively guarantee the confidentiality of information gathered."
Člen 24, odstavek 1 a (novo) (Direktiva 2002/59/ES)
Article 24, paragraph 1 a (new) (Directive 2002/59/EC)
(13a) V členu 24 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(13a) In Article 24 the following paragraph shall be added: