natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1. , še posebej točke 26,
1. , and in particular point 26 thereof,
ob upoštevanju uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
UL C [...], [...], str. [...] ,
OJ C […], […], p. […] ,
(1) je Evropska unija ustanovila solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije („sklad“), da bi pokazala svojo solidarnost prebivalstvu območij, ki so jih prizadele nesreče,
(1) The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the "Fund") to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
(2) medinstitucionalni sporazum s 17. maja 2006 dopušča uporabo sklada do letne zgornje meje v višini ene milijarde evrov,
(2) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
(3) uredba (ES) št. 2012/2002 vsebuje določbe, v skladu s katerimi se sklad lahko uporabi,
(3) Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised.
(4) sta Madžarska in Grčija predložili vlogi za uporabo sklada v zvezi z dvema nesrečama, ki so ju povzročile poplave,
(4) Hungary and Greece submitted applications to mobilise the Fund, concerning two disasters caused by flooding,
V okviru splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007 se uporabi solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije za zagotovitev zneska v višini 24.370.114 eurov v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 24 370 114 in commitment and payment appropriations.
predsednik predsednik
The President The President
Uporaba solidarnostnega sklada EU v skladu s točko 26 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund according to point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
Poročilo o politiki konkurence 2005
Report on Competition Policy 2005
o politiki konkurence 2005
on Competition Policy 2005
- ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o politiki konkurence za leto 2005,
- having regard to the Commission Report on Competition Policy 2005,
- ob upoštevanju preiskav, ki jih je Komisija opravila v energetskem sektorju in sektorju bančnega poslovanja s prebivalstvom,
- having regard to the Commission sector inquiries in the energy and retail banking sectors,
- ob upoštevanju ciljev lizbonske strategije,
- having regard to the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy,
- ob upoštevanju dokumenta za razpravo o uporabi člena 82 pogodbe v primerih zlorab prevladujočega položaja, ki ga je pripravil generalni direktorat za konkurenco decembra 2005,
- having regard to the discussion paper by the Competition Directorate-General on the application of Article 82 of the Treaty to exclusionary abuses of December 2005,
- ob upoštevanju uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 s 16. decembra 2002 o izvajanju pravil konkurence iz členov 81 in 82 pogodbe
- having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty
1. in uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 773/2004 s 7. aprila 2004 o vodenju postopkov s strani Komisije v skladu s členoma 81 in 82 pogodbe ES
1. and Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty
- ob upoštevanju smernic o načinu določanja kazni, naloženih v skladu s členom 23(2)(a) uredbe št. 1/2003
- having regard to the Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003
UL C 210, 1.9.2006, str.
OJ C 210, 1.9.2006, p.
- ob upoštevanju uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 z dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij (uredba ES o združitvah)
- having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation)
- ob upoštevanju študije o protiukrepih v zvezi z združitvami 2005, ki jo je pripravil generalni direktorat za konkurenco oktobra 2005 (Merger Remedies Study),
- having regard to the DG Competition Merger Remedies Study 2005 of October 2005 (Merger Remedies Study),
- ob upoštevanju uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 1999 o izvajanju uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 pogodbe o ES
- having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty
- ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES ( COM(2005)0672 ) (zelena knjiga o odškodninah),
- having regard to the Commission Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules ( COM(2005)0672 ) (Damages Green Paper),
- ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta Komisije za državne pomoči z naslovom "Manjša in bolje usmerjena državna pomoč: časovni načrt za reformo državnih pomoči 2005–2009" ( COM(2005)0107 ),
- having regard to the Commission State Aid Action Plan on Less and better targeted state aid: a roadmap for state aid reform 2005-2009 ( COM(2005)0107 ),
- ob upoštevanju uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1628/2006 z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 pogodbe pri državni regionalni pomoči za naložbe
- having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 of 24 October 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to national regional investment aid
UL L 302, 1.11.2006, str.
OJ L 302, 1.11.2006, p.
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije s 27. aprila 2006 o sektorskih vidikih akcijskega načrta državne pomoči – pomoč za inovacije
- having regard to its resolution of 27 April 2006 on sectoral aspects of the State Aid Action Plan: aid for innovation
UL C 296 E, 6.12.2006, str.
OJ C 296 E, 6.12.2006, p.
- ob upoštevanju dokumenta o okviru Skupnosti za državno pomoč za raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije, ki so ga službe Komisije pripravile septembra 2006,
- having regard to the Commission staff paper on a Community Framework for State aid for Research and Development and Innovation of September 2006,
- ob upoštevanju smernic Komisije o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja
- having regard to the Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection
UL C 37, 3.2.2001, str.
OJ C 37, 3.2.2001, p.
- ob upoštevanju osnutka smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči in naložbah tveganega kapitala v mala in srednje velika podjetja,
- having regard to the draft Community guidelines on State aid and risk capital investments in small and medium-sized enterprises,
- ob upoštevanju smernic o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013
- having regard to the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013
- ob upoštevanju odločbe Komisije 2005/842/ES z 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) pogodbe o ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena
- having regard to Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest
67. , v različici, kot je bila za pripravo mnenja posredovana Parlamentu 8. septembra 2004,
67. , in the version as forwarded to Parliament for its opinion on 8 September 2004,
- ob upoštevanju resolucije z 22. maja 2005 o državni pomoči v obliki nadomestil javnih storitev
- having regard to its resolution of 22 February 2005 on State aid in the form of public service compensation
- ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zvezi s storitvami splošnega pomena in zlasti razsodbe Sodišča s 24. julija 2003 v primeru C-280/00,
- having regard to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities relating to services of general interest and, in particular, to the Court's judgment of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00
Primer C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] PSES I-7747.
Case C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6‑0176/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0176/2007 ),
3. pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije za izboljšanje kakovosti izvrševanja odločitev v okviru Evropske mreže za konkurenco prek okrepljenega sodelovanja z in med nacionalnimi organi za konkurenco;
Welcomes the Commission’s efforts to improve the quality of enforcement of decisions in the context of the ECN through increased cooperation with and among national competition authorities (NCAs);
5. ponovno poziva, kar zadeva storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ob upoštevanju precejšnjih razlik med politikami, ki prevladujejo v državah članicah, k nadaljnjemu napredku v zvezi s pojasnjevanjem obstoječih pravil konkurence in njihove praktične uporabe;
Renews the call in relation to services of general economic interest (SGEIs) given the considerable differences in policies prevailing across the Member States, for further progress in relation to both the clarification of the existing competition rules and their practical application;
9. pozdravlja sprejetje pravil ES o konkurenci s strani držav članic, ki so se zadnje pridružile Evropski uniji, in priporoča dodatno izboljšanje kakovosti izvajanja teh pravil;
Welcomes the adoption of EC competition rules by the most recently acceded Member States and recommends the continued refinement of the quality of the implementation of such rules;
13. podpira prizadevanja Komisije za uvedbo skupne konsolidirane davčne osnove za pravne osebe, veljavne v celotni EU, ker bo omogočila lažjo primerjavo, in opozarja na vidike iz resolucije s 13. decembra 2005 o „obdavčevanju podjetij v Evropski uniji: skupna konsolidirana davčna osnova za pravne osebe“
Supports the Commission’s efforts to introduce an EU wide common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB), since this will make for easier comparison, and draws attention to the views endorsed in its resolution of 13 December 2005 on taxation of undertakings in the European Union: a common consolidated corporate tax base
UL C 286 E, 23.11.2006, str.
OJ C 286 E, 23.11.2006, p.
19. poudarja, da bi bilo treba večjo prednost nameniti, poleg odprave vertikalnih konglomeratov in zagotovitve pogojev za učinkovit dostop do trga, tudi dokončni razdružitvi lastništva v energetskem sektorju;
Underlines that the completion of ownership unbundling in the energy sector, alongside the dismantling of vertical conglomerates and guaranteeing conditions for effective market access should be given stronger priority;
23. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za izvedbo študije, s katero bo ugotovila, ali se cene energije zvišujejo predvsem zaradi zvišanja cen goriva in vpliva sistema trgovanja z emisijami EU ali pa je vzrok za povišanje nekonkurenčno ravnanje udeležencev na trgu;
Welcomes the initiative taken by the Commission to commission a study to identify whether the rise in prices for energy is mainly due to the rise of fuel prices and to the impact of the Emission Trading Scheme, or whether it is due to the anti-competitive behaviour of market players;
25. pozdravlja namen Komisije, da bi podprla medsebojno povezljivost infrastrukturnih omrežij; poziva, da se posebna pozornost nameni posebnim značilnostim obrobnih trgov;
Welcomes the Commission’s aim to support the inter-connectivity of infrastructure networks; calls for special attention to be paid to the specific features of peripheral markets;
30. ugotavlja, na podlagi študije o protiukrepih v zvezi z združitvami 2005, da je učinkovitost strukturnih protiukrepov pogosto oslabljena zaradi nekonkurenčnega obnašanja podjetij in javnih organov, zlasti omejevanja dostopa do trga; zato poziva Komisijo, naj poveča nadzor te potencialne vrzeli na področju izvajanja protiukrepov v zvezi z združitvami;
Notes that according to the Merger Remedies Study, the effectiveness of structural remedies is often undermined by the uncompetitive behaviour of the firms and public authorities, in particular, by the limitation of market access; consequently calls on the Commission to increase its vigilance as regards that possible loophole in merger remedy enforcement;
32. ponovno poziva k nadaljnjemu spremljanju in odprtemu poročanju o razvoju državnih pomoči, s primerjavami med državami članicami, da se doseže želeni cilj zmanjšanja takšnih pomoči;
Reiterates its earlier call for follow-up and open reporting on the development of State aid, with comparisons between the Member States, with a view to achieving the desired objective of reducing such aid;
35. pozdravlja povečano občutljivost Komisije v zvezi z vprašanji lizbonske strategije v okviru upravljanja državnih pomoči in zaskrbljenost v zvezi s približevanjem takšnih vprašanj manj razvitim regijam v Evropski uniji;
Welcomes the increased sensitivity of the Commission in relation to the Lisbon agenda issues in the context of State aid management and its concerns regarding the 'catching-up' regarding such matters of less developed regions in the European Union;
39. pozdravlja sodelovanje Komisije s kitajskimi organi z namenom vzpostavitve organa za konkurenco na Kitajskem; poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za vzpostavitev učinkovite kulture konkurence na Kitajskem;
Welcomes the Commission's cooperation with Chinese authorities towards the establishment of a competition authority in that China; urges the Commission to continue its efforts towards instituting an effective competition culture in that China;
42. poziva Svet in Komisijo, da okrepita skupna prizadevanja in jih bolj osredotočita na organizacijo pobude "dan konkurence" za ozaveščanje evropskih potrošnikov in državljanov o ključnem pomenu politike konkurence ES pri zagotavljanju gospodarske rasti in delovnih mest v celotni Evropski uniji;
Calls upon the Council and the Commission to improve and better focus their joint efforts in the organisation of the Competition Day initiative to highlight to European consumers and citizens the crucial importance of EC competition policy in delivering economic growth and jobs throughout the European Union;
Leta 2005 so začele veljati in bile konsolidirane nekatere širše smernice, ki so bile poprej določene za reformo politike konkurence, prav tako pa so bili narejeni novi pomembni koraki v smeri posodobitve in povečanja učinkovitosti, preglednosti in skladnosti evropske politike konkurence.
In 2005 a number of the broad lines previously laid down for competition policy reform entered into force and were consolidated, and important new steps were taken to update, and enhance the effectiveness, transparency, and coherence of, European competition policy.
V splošnem to poročilo ugotavlja, da je v zadnjih letih prisotna spodbudna težnja, da politika konkurence daje prednost razumevanju dejanskih ali potencialnih učinkov nekaterih praks ali sprememb v strukturah podjetij in se odmika od uporabe pravil konkurence v strogo formalnem smislu (tj. pristopa, ki temelji na pravilih).
In general terms this report notes that there has been an encouraging tendency in recent years for competition policy to favour understanding of the actual or potential effects of given practices or changes to business structures and move away from application of competition rules in a strictly formal sense (i.e. the ‘rules-based’ approach).
Ta možnost, čeprav je dobrodošla, predstavlja večji izziv od tradicionalne metode, ki temelji na pravilih.
Though welcome, this option is more challenging than the traditional rules-based method.
Treba je preprečiti, da bi večja zapletenost novega pristopa povzročila negotovost pri podjetjih, zlasti manjših, ali zavračanje tveganja, kar bi bilo v nasprotju s cilji politike konkurence.
The greater complexity of the new approach must not be allowed to create uncertainty for business, especially smaller firms, or an aversion to risk that would run counter to the aims of competition policy.
Velik pomen ima zagotovitev usklajene stopnje izvrševanja v različnih državah članicah, pri čemer morajo poleg organov za konkurenco sodelovati tudi nacionalni pravni sistemi, zlasti pa sodišča.
It is vital to ensure a consistent degree of enforcement in the different countries; to that end, national legal systems and especially courts need to be involved alongside the competition authorities.
Obravnavano poročilo potrjuje, da je na strateško pomembnih trgih (npr. energetskem) in na področju storitev (vključno s storitvami splošnega gospodarskega pomena) še vedno premalo konkurence.
The report under review confirms that competition is still severely wanting on markets of strategic importance (energy, for example) and in services (including services of general economic interest).
Komisija in nacionalni organi za konkurenco morajo zato pri opredeljevanju svojih prednostnih sektorjev določiti jasna merila in oblikovati usklajeno podlago za presojo vpliva njihovih ukrepov na blagostanje potrošnikov in zaščito njihovih interesov.
When determining their priority sectors, therefore, the Commission and the national competition authorities must lay down clear-cut criteria and establish a coherent basis on which to assess the impact of their actions on the well-being of consumers and protection of their interests.
PRAKSE, KI OVIRAJO KONKURENCO ("ANTITRUST")
PRACTICES RESTRAINING COMPETITION (‘ANTITRUST’)
Poleg tega je Evropska mreža za konkurenco ključnega pomena za uspešno izvajanje novih pravil iz uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 (ECN).
The European Competition Network (ECN) is, in addition, central to successful implementation of the new rules embodied in Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.
Vsi ti ukrepi pripomorejo k učinkovitejši politiki konkurence.
These measures all make for a more effective competition policy.
V zvezi s tem poglavjem bi morala Komisija pozornost posvetiti nekaterim področjem, ki bi se jih dalo izboljšati, kar zadeva konkurenco.
However, the Commission’s attention should be drawn in this section to certain areas in which there is room for improvement where competition is concerned.
Finančni sektor se še vedno spopada z resnimi težavami glede konkurence in ureditve.
In the financial sector there are still serious competition and regulation problems.
Evropski trg ostaja podvržen ureditvam z izjemami, ki so v praksi namenjene dajanju prednosti nacionalnim akterjem.
The European market continues to be subject to exceptional arrangements that serve in practice to favour national players.
Prav tako bi bilo treba storiti nadaljnje korake v smeri splošne uskladitve meril in praks, ki jih uporabljajo zakonodajalci in nadzorni organi.
Further steps should also be taken towards general harmonisation of the respective criteria and practices applied by regulators and supervisory bodies.
V zvezi z delom, ki ga je Komisija začela glede smernic o uporabi člena 82 v primerih zlorab prevladujočega položaja, je v priporočilih EP, navedenih v pismu, ki je bilo marca 2006 poslano komisarju, poudarjena potreba po zagotovitvi visokih standardov nadzora, kar zadeva zlorabe trga, ter po večji usklajenosti in predvidljivosti odločitev, ob upoštevanju, da mora imeti varstvo pravic potrošnikov prednost pred ocenjevanjem ekonomske učinkovitosti praks.
Regarding the work set in motion by the Commission on the guidelines on the application of Article 82 to exclusionary abuses, the EP’s recommendations, set out in a letter sent to the Commissioner in March 2006, emphasised the need to guarantee high standards of vigilance as regards market abuses and make decisions more consistent and predictable, proceeding on the understanding that assessment of the economic efficiency of practices had to take second place to protection of consumers’ rights.
Program Skupnosti o prizanesljivosti z vidika odkrivanja in obsodb tajnih dogovorov prinaša nesporne prednosti, ki pa bi se jih za učinkovitejše izvajanje programa v praksi dalo še izpopolniti.
The Community Model Leniency Programme brings indisputable advantages from the point of view of detecting and condemning collusion, but they could be improved if the programme were implemented more effectively at the practical level.
Nujno je treba preprečiti, da bi prišlo do zlorabe tega programa – bodisi da bi prosilci umetno izrabljali vloge v okviru programa prizanesljivosti bodisi da bi prišlo do sorazmernega kaznovanja podjetij, ki bi kot manjši udeleženci imela manj možnosti, da bi v postopku prispevala kakšno pomembno dejstvo.
It is essential to prevent the programme being misused, whether by allowing applicants to artificially exploit leniency applications or by, in relative terms, penalising firms which, as smaller stakeholders, would be less able to add anything of relevance to the proceedings.
Ponovno se poudarja pomen pobud, ki omogočajo prenos jasnih in preglednih usmeritev na podjetja, zlasti mala in srednje velika.
Once again, what matters is to produce initiatives enabling clear and transparent guidelines to be passed on to business, especially SMEs.
Kot dopolnitev te pobude Parlament pozdravlja dejstvo, da bo prišlo do uporabe " odškodninskih tožb zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES ", kot je predvideno v sklepih zelene knjige, saj bodo s tem ustvarjeni pogoji, ki so potrebni za uveljavljanje pravice do nadomestila za škodo, ki je bila povzročena državljanom in podjetjem, zlasti malim in srednje velikim.
As a complement to the above initiative, Parliament welcomes the fact that the practice of ‘ damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules ’ is to be applied as provided for in the conclusions of the Green Paper, since this will create the conditions required in order to exercise the right to compensation for damage caused to citizens and firms, in particular SMEs.
Treba bo zmanjšati nevarnost morebitnega navzkrižja med pobudami, odobrenimi v okviru programa prizanesljivosti Skupnosti, in obveznostjo nadomestitve povzročene škode, ki jo določa zelena knjiga.
It will be necessary to reduce the risk of potential conflict between the incentives granted under the Community Model Leniency Programme and the obligation to make amends, as laid down in the Green Paper.
Končno je eden izmed vzrokov za zaskrbljenost tudi to, da bi med podjetji lahko prišlo do novih oblik nepoštene konkurence zaradi čedalje bolj razširjenega zaposlovanja visokokvalificiranih mladih delavcev za nedoločen čas in na neurejen način v obliki pripravništev , ki ne izpolnjujejo minimalnih standardov glede plačila in pravic zaposlenih.
One final cause for concern is that firms could be drawn into new forms of unfair competition stemming from the fact that highly skilled young workers are increasingly being recruited as trainees under open-ended unregulated arrangements not conforming to minimum wage and employment rights standards.
ZDRUŽITVE IN PREVZEMI
MERGERS AND ACQUISTIONS (M & A)
Zadnji dogodki na enotnem trgu, zlasti na področju energije in finančnih storitev kažejo na neustreznost trenutno veljavne ureditve Skupnosti, ki velja za združitve in prevzeme.
The latest developments on the single market, especially where energy and financial services are concerned, demonstrate the inadequacy of the current Community regulation applying to mergers and acquisitions.
Komisar je novembra 2005 javno priznal, da pravilo "dveh tretjin" prometa na domačem trgu, ki omejuje pristojnost Komisije za ocenjevanje združitev z vplivom na Skupnost (" Community impact "), ni več ustrezno.
As the Commissioner publicly admitted in November 2005, the ‘two-thirds’ rule, referring to domestic market turnover, is no longer an appropriate cut-off point for the Commission’s power to assess mergers with Community impact.