natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
o pobudi Republike Avstrije, Kraljevine Belgije in Republike Finske za sprejetje sklepa Sveta glede sodelovanja med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi držav članic na področju sledenja in identifikacije premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, ali drugega premoženja, povezanega s kaznivimi dejanji
on the initiative by the Republic of Austria, the Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Finland with a view to the adoption of a Council Decision concerning cooperation between Asset Recovery Offices of the Member States in the field of tracing and identification of proceeds from, or other property related to, crime
– ob upoštevanju pobude Republike Avstrije, Kraljevine Belgije in Republike Finske (7259/2006),
– having regard to the initiative by the Republic of Austria, the Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Finland (7259/2006),
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe o EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0122/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0122/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0388/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0388/2006 ),
5. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam Republike Avstrije, Kraljevine Belgije ter Republike Finske.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments of the Republic of Austria, the Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Finland.
Besedilo, ki ga predlagajo Republika Avstrija, Kraljevina Belgija in Republika Finska
Text proposed by the Republic of Austria, the Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Finland
Ne glede na odstavek 1 lahko država članica v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ustanovi ali imenuje dva urada za odvzem premoženjske koristi.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, a Member State may, within the limits of national law, set up or designate two Asset Recovery Offices.
V primeru, da ima država članica več kot dve enoti, pristojni za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, sta lahko imenovani samo dve enoti kot nacionalni točki za stike.
Where a Member State has more than two units charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime, only two units may be designated national contact points.
Predlagani amandma jasno poudarja, da ni potrebe po ustanovitvi nove nacionalne točke, če v državi članici že obstajajo enote za odvzem premoženjske koristi, katerim bi se podelilo pristojnost.
The proposed amendment makes clear that there is no need to set up a new national contact point if a Member State already has asset recovery units which would be given that competence.
V primeru, da bi se tem enotam podelilo te pristojnosti, sta lahko od teh enot imenovani samo dve kot nacionalni točki za stike.
If that competence is to be allocated to such units, only two of them can be designated national contact points.
Vsaka država članica imenuje enoto, ki je nacionalni urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi v smislu tega člena.
Each Member State shall indicate the unit which is a national Asset Recovery Office within the meaning of this Article.
Države članice o tem in o kakršnih koli naknadnih spremembah pisno obvestijo generalni sekretariat Sveta.
Member States shall notify this information and any subsequent changes to the General Secretariat of the Council in writing.
To drugim enotam, pristojnim za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, ne preprečuje izmenjave informacij v skladu s členoma 3 in 4.
That shall not preclude other units which are charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime from exchanging information under Articles 3 and 4.
To drugim enotam, pristojnim za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, ne preprečuje izmenjave informacij v skladu s členoma 3 in 4 z uradom za odvzem premoženjske koristi z druge države članice.
That shall not preclude other units which are charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime from exchanging information under Articles 3 and 4 with the Asset Recovery Office of another Member State .
Predlagani amandma natančneje pojasnjuje potrebo po izmenjavi informacij med uradi, pristojnimi za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi.
The proposed amendment specifies more clearly the need for exchange of information between offices charged with facilitating the tracing and identification of assets.
Urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi lahko zaprosi za informacije za enega izmed namenov iz člena 1.
An Asset Recovery Office may make a request for information for a purpose stated in Article 1.
V ta namen uporablja postopke, predvidene v Okvirnem sklepu o poenostavitvi izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi pregona držav članic Evropske unije.
To that end it shall use the procedures provided for under the Framework Decision on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union.
Uporabljajo se razlogi za odklonitev iz tega okvirnega sklepa.
The grounds of refusal of that Framework Decision shall apply.
Urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi ali enota, pristojna v državi članici za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, lahko zaprosi za informacije za enega izmed namenov iz člena 1.
An Asset Recovery Office or a unit in a Member State charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of assets may make a request for information for a purpose stated in Article 1.
Skladno s spremembo člena 1 se ustrezno dopolni člen 3 tako, da se poleg posebne nacionalne točke doda še drugo enoto, ki ima enaka pooblastila.
Consistent with the amendment to Article 1, this amendment supplements Article 3 to include not only the specified national contact point but also another unit with the same powers.
Uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi lahko - v mejah veljavne nacionalne zakonodaje in ne da bi se bilo glede tega vložilo zaprosilo - izmenjajo informacije, o katerih menijo, da so potrebne za izpolnjevanje nalog drugega urada za odvzem premoženjske koristi v skladu z nameni iz člena 1 tega sklepa.
Asset Recovery Offices may, within the limits of the applicable national law and without a request to that effect, exchange information which they consider necessary for the execution of the tasks of another Asset Recovery Office in pursuance of the purposes of this Decision as stated in Article 1.
Uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi ali enote, pristojne v državi članici za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, lahko - v mejah veljavne nacionalne zakonodaje in ne da bi se bilo glede tega vložilo zaprosilo - izmenjajo informacije, o katerih menijo, da so potrebne za izpolnjevanje nalog drugega urada za odvzem premoženjske koristi v skladu z nameni iz člena 1 tega sklepa.
Asset Recovery Offices or units in a Member State charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of assets may, within the limits of the applicable national law and without a request to that effect, exchange information which they consider necessary for the execution of the tasks of another Asset Recovery Office in pursuance of the purposes of this Decision as stated in Article 1.
Skladno s spremembo člena 1 se ustrezno dopolni člen 4 tako, da se poleg posebne nacionalnih točk doda še druge enote, ki imajo enaka pooblastila.
Consistent with the amendment to Article 1, this amendment supplements Article 4 to include not only the specified national contact points but also other units with the same powers.
Posredujoči urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi pri posredovanju informacij lahko v skladu s tem sklepom določi omejitve in pogoje za uporabo informacij.
When transmitting information pursuant to this Decision, the transmitting Asset Recovery Office may impose restrictions and conditions on the use of information.
Urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi, ki prejme informacije, upošteva vse te omejitve in pogoje.
The receiving Asset Recovery Office shall comply with any such restrictions and conditions.
S predlaganim amandmajem predlagam črtanje člena 5, ker je omenjena vsebina zajeta že v drugih členih tega Okvirnega sklepa Sveta.
This amendment proposes that Article 5 should be deleted because the substance of it is already included in other Articles of this Council Framework Decision.
Svet je 24. februarja 2005 sprejel Okvirni sklep Sveta o zaplembi premoženjske koristi, pripomočkov in premoženja, ki so povezani s kaznivimi dejanji.
On 24 February 2005 the Council adopted a Framework Decision on Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property.
Komisija se zavzema za spodbuditev ustanavljanja uradov za odvzem premoženjske koristi v državah članicah in zagotovitev, da ti uradi lahko hitro izmenjavajo informacije.
The Commission advocates setting up Asset Recovery Offices in the Member States and ensuring that these offices can exchange information rapidly.
Organiziran kriminal se razrašča, če organi, pristojni za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu, niso zmožni izvesti uspešnega zasega in odvzema finančnega dobička, pridobljenega s kaznivim dejanjem.
Huge sums of money can be obtained through organised crime, which flourishes if the bodies charged with fighting it are unable to seize and recover the proceeds of crime.
Zaradi tega je treba vzpostaviti nacionalne urade za odvzem premoženjske koristi in jim omogočiti neposredno izmenjavo informacij.
Consequently, there is a need to set up national Asset Recovery Offices and to make it possible for them to exchange information directly.
Vsebina predloga:
Substance of the proposal
Namen Okvirnega sklepa Sveta je zagotoviti, da vsaka država članica ustanovi ali imenuje nacionalni urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, in da vzpostavi uspešno koordinacijo med uradi, ne da bi to sodelovanje oviralo notranji status urada znotraj države članice.
The purpose of the Council Framework Decision is to ensure that each Member State sets up or designates a national office for recovering the proceeds of crime and to establish successful coordination between the offices without such cooperation interfering with the internal status of an office within a Member State.
Okvirni sklep Sveta poudarja, da je predlog izključno namenjen učinkovitejšemu mednarodnemu sodelovanju med uradi, in prepušča državam članicam oblikovanje strukture uradov za odvzem premoženjske koristi in način iskanja podatkov znotraj države.
The Council Framework Decision stresses that the proposal is intended solely to achieve more effective international cooperation between the offices, and leaves it up to the Member States to decide the structure of their Asset Recovery Offices and the method of searching for information within the country.
Pogosto se dogaja, da je obsodba izrečena v eni državi, medtem ko je dobiček pridobljen s kaznivim dejanjem v neki drugi državi.
Convictions are often handed down in one country when the proceeds of the crime concerned are located in another.
Zaradi tega bi ustanovitev ali imenovanje uradov za odvzem premoženjske koristi moralo zagotoviti hitrejšo in učinkovitejšo izmenjavo informacij, kar bi pomagalo pridobiti potrebne strokovne podlage za preiskavo in analizo finančnih sledi kriminalnih dejavnosti.
Therefore, setting up or designating Asset Recovery Offices should ensure faster and more efficient exchange of information, which would help to secure the necessary technical basis for investigating and analysing the financial trails of criminal activity.
Sodelovanje med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi poteka na podlagi Okvirnega sklepa o poenostavitvi izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi pregona držav članic Evropske unije.
Cooperation between the Asset Recovery Offices will take place on the basis of the Framework Decision on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union.
Podatki, za katere uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi zaprosijo urade drugih držav članic, morajo imeti točno naveden namen zaprosila in vzroke zanj.
An Asset Recovery Office must specify, when requesting information from the offices of other Member States, the object of the request and the reasons for it.
Osebni podatki, ki se obdelujejo v okviru uporabe tega sklepa, se varujejo v skladu z načeli Konvencije Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov in, za tiste države članice, ki so Konvencijo ratificirale, v skladu z Dodatnim protokolom z dne 8. novembra 2001.
The personal data processed in the context of the application of this Decision must be protected in accordance with the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, and, for those Member States which have ratified it, the Additional Protocol of 8 November 2001.
Stališče poročevalca:
Position of the rapporteur
Poročevalec meni, da je predlog Okvirnega sklepa Sveta za vzpostavitev ali imenovanje uradov za odvzem premoženjske koristi pomemben korak naprej k uspešnemu nadzoru delovanja organiziranega kriminala.
The rapporteur believes that the proposed Council Framework Decision on setting up or designating Asset Recovery Offices marks an important step towards bringing organised crime under control.
Države članice naj zagotovijo, da uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi izmenjujejo vse uporabne podatke, ki jih imajo na razpolago, kar bo omogočalo lažje zasledovanje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, in drugega premoženja, ki je lahko predmet zasega.
Member States should ensure that Asset Recovery Offices exchange all the useful information at their disposal, which will facilitate the tracing and identification of proceeds from crime and other assets which are liable to seizure.
Bistvene spremembe, ki jih predlaga poročevalec, pa so:
The main changes proposed by the rapporteur are as follows:
- v predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta ni dovolj jasno, če je potrebna vzpostavitev posebne nacionalne točke v primeru, da v državi članici že obstajajo enote, pristojne za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem.
- it is not sufficiently clear in the proposed Council Framework Decision whether it is necessary to set up a national contact point if a Member State already has units charged with facilitating the tracing and identification of the proceeds of crime.
Poročevalec meni, da bi se lahko tem enotam podelilo te pristojnosti in, če sta v neki državi članici dve enoti, se podeli pristojnost obema;
The rapporteur believes these units could be given this competence, and where two such units exist in a Member State both of them could be given this competence;
- skladno s spremembo člena 1 se ustrezno dopolnita člena 3 in 4 tako, da se poleg posebne nacionalne točke doda še drugo enoto, ki ima enaka pooblastila;
- consistent with the amendment to Article 1, Articles 3 and 4 are amended accordingly to include not only the specified national contact point but also another unit with the same powers;
- predlagam črtanje člena 5, ker je omenjena vsebina zajeta že v drugih členih tega Okvirnega sklepa Sveta;
- the deletion of Article 5, as the substance of this Article is already included in other Articles of the Council Framework Decision.
Poročevalec meni, da bo tudi ta Okvirni sklep Sveta prispeval k učinkovitejšemu boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu.
The rapporteur believes that this Council Framework Decision will help to make the fight against organised crime more effective.
Pobuda Republike Avstrije, Kraljevine Belgije in Republike Finske za sprejetje sklepa Sveta glede sodelovanja med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi držav članic na področju sledenja in identifikacije premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, ali drugega premoženja, povezanega s kaznivimi dejanji
Initiative by the Republic of Austria, the Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Finland with a view to the adoption of a Council Decision concerning cooperation between Asset Recovery Offices of the Member States in the field of tracing and identification of proceeds from, or other property related to, crime
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi posebnega programa „Preprečevanje kriminala in boj proti njemu“ za obdobje 2007–2013 – Splošni program „Varnost in varstvo svoboščin“
on the proposal establishing the Specific Programme ‘Prevention of and Fight against Crime’ for the period 2007-2013, General Programme ‘Security and Safeguarding Liberties’
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................19
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................21
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi posebnega programa „Preprečevanje kriminala in boj proti njemu“ za obdobje 2007–2013 – Splošni program „Varnost in varstvo svoboščin“
on the proposal establishing the specific Programme ‘Prevention of and Fight against Crime’ for the Period 2007-2013, General Programme ‘Security and Safeguarding Liberties’
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0124 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0124 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0242/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0242/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0389/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A6‑0000/2006),
2. meni, da je treba pri predvidenem finančnem okvirnem znesku, ki je vključen v ta zakonodajni predlog, upoštevati zgornjo mejo iz razdelka 3 A novega večletnega finančnega okvira, in opozarja, da bo letni znesek sprejet v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka v skladu z določbami iz točke 38 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006
Considers that the indicative financial reference amount indicated in the legislative proposal must be compatible with the ceiling of heading 3 A of the new Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF) and points out that the annual amount will be decided within the annual budgetary procedure in accordance with the provisions of point 38 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006;
(1) Cilj Unije zagotoviti državljanom visoko stopnjo varstva na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice, kakor je določeno v četrti alinei člena 2 in členu 29 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, se dosega s preprečevanjem kriminala in bojem proti njemu, organiziranemu ali neorganiziranemu.
(1) The Union’s objective of providing citizens with a high level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice shall be achieved, as provided for in the fourth indent of Article 2, and in Article 29 of the Treaty on European Union, by preventing and combating crime, organised or otherwise.
(1) Prednostni cilj Unije zagotoviti državljanom visoko stopnjo varstva na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice, kakor je določeno v četrti alinei člena 2 in členu 29 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, se dosega s preprečevanjem kriminala in bojem proti njemu, organiziranemu ali neorganiziranemu.
(1) The Union’s priority objective of providing citizens with a high level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice shall be achieved, as provided for in the fourth indent of Article 2, and in Article 29 of the Treaty on European Union, by preventing and combating crime, organised or otherwise.
Gre za jasno potrditev prednostnega pomena, ki ga EU pripisuje vprašanju varnosti in torej boju proti vsem oblikam kriminala, v prizadevanjih, da bi razvili resnično območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
It needs to be stated clearly that in pursuing its objective of building a genuine area of freedom, security and justice, the EU gives priority to security, and thus to combating crime in all its forms.
(2) Za zaščito svobode in varnosti naših državljanov in družbe pred kriminalnimi dejanji mora Unija sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za dejansko in učinkovito preprečevanje, odkrivanje, preiskovanje in preganjanje vseh oblik kriminala, zlasti v primeru organiziranega kriminala .
(2) To protect the freedom and security of our citizens and society from criminal activities, the Union must take the necessary measures to prevent, detect, investigate, and prosecute all forms of crime efficiently and effectively, most particularly in cases of organised crime.
(5) Potrebno in primerno je razširiti možnosti za financiranje ukrepov, namenjenih preprečevanju kriminala in boju proti njemu , ter pregledati pogoje in načine za učinkovitost, stroškovno učinkovitost in preglednost.
(5) It is necessary and appropriate to extend the possibilities for funding of measures aiming at the prevention of and the fight against crime , and to review the modalities in the interest of efficacy, cost-efficiency and transparency.
Določbe tega programa morajo med drugim omogočiti pregled pogojev in načinov za učinkovitost, stroškovno učinkovitost in preglednost.
The provisions of this programme should, furthermore, enable a review to be made of the modalities in the interest of efficacy, cost-efficiency and transparency.
Prejšnji program AGIS je prispeval k boljšemu poznavanju in sodelovanju med različnimi organi za boj proti kriminalu.
The previous AGIS programme made a useful contribution to improving understanding and cooperation between the various authorities responsible for combating crime.
Zaželeno je, da dobi sodelovanje s tem programom bolj neposredno operativno razsežnost.
The programme covered by this proposal should give such cooperation a more directly operational dimension.
(9) Ker države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči ciljev ukrepa, zlasti preprečevanja organiziranega in čezmejnega kriminala ter boja proti njima, in jih zaradi obsega ali učinkov pobude laže doseže Unija , ukrepe lahko sprejme Unija v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
(9) Since the objectives of the action to be taken, particularly the prevention of and the fight against organised and transborder crime, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale or impact of the initiative, be better achieved at the Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set up in Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta sklep ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
(9) Ker države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči ciljev ukrepa, zlasti preprečevanja organiziranega in čezmejnega kriminala ter boja proti njima, in je zaradi obsega ali učinkov pobude potrebno posredovanje Unije , lahko slednja sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
(9) Since the objectives of the action to be taken, particularly the prevention of and the fight against organised and transborder crime, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale or impact of the initiative, require action at the Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set up in Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Potrditev načela subsidiarnosti.
Reaffirmation of the subsidiarity principle.