natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
32. meni, da morajo imeti potrošniki, uporabniki, delavci in vlagatelji možnost, da izberejo ali zavrnejo izdelke/dobavitelje, delovna mesta in podjetja glede na to, ali ti kažejo večjo ali manjšo odgovornost do okolja in socialnih pogojev;
Believes that consumers, customers, employees and investors must have the opportunity to select or reject products/suppliers, jobs and companies depending on whether they are more or less responsible in terms of the environment and social conditions;
37. poziva Komisijo, naj uredi solidarno odgovornost za splošna in glavna podjetja, da bi se odzvala na zlorabe pri sklepanju pogodb z delavci kot podizvajalci ali zunanjimi izvajalci ter da bi vzpostavila pregleden in konkurenčen notranji trg za vsa podjetja;
Calls on the Commission to regulate joint and several liability on the part of general or principal undertakings in order to deal with abuses in the subcontracting and outsourcing of workers and to set up a transparent and competitive internal market for all companies;
40. meni, da je politiko DOP mogoče okrepiti z večjo ozaveščenostjo in uporabo veljavnih pravnih instrumentov; poziva Komisijo, naj organizira in spodbuja kampanje ozaveščanja ter spremlja uvedbo neposredne odgovornosti v tujini v skladu z Bruseljsko konvencijo in izvajanje direktiv o zavajajočem oglaševanju ter nepošteni poslovni praksi, da bo podjetja spodbudila k spoštovanju prostovoljnih kodeksov ravnanja glede DOP;
Believes that CSR policies can be enhanced by better awareness and implementation of existing legal instruments; calls on the Commission to organise and promote awareness campaigns and monitor the implementation of the application of foreign direct liability according to the Brussels Convention, and on the application of the directives on misleading advertising and unfair commercial practices to adherence by companies to their voluntary CSR codes of conduct;
43. ponovno ugotavlja, da so bili na področju navezujočih aktov oblikovani dobri predpisi in zakonodaja ter da taka zakonodaja podjetjem, ki spoštujejo načela DOP, ponuja spodbude, tistim, ki teh načel še niso sprejela, pa obenem daje čas, ki ga potrebujejo za prilagoditev;
Reiterates that good regulation and legislation has been developed in the field of soft law, and that such legislation offers incentives to companies who comply with CSR principles, while allowing companies that have not yet signed up to CSR principles the necessary time to adapt;
44. pozdravlja zaveze v sporočilu, da bo Komisija podprla in spodbujala DOP na vseh področjih svojega delovanja, in poziva k večjim prizadevanjem, da se te zaveze vedno pretvorijo v dejanja;
Welcomes the commitments repeated in the Communication for the Commission to support and promote CSR across all of its fields of activity and calls for a major effort to translate these commitments into concrete actions across the board;
47. pozdravlja zavezo, da bo izobraževanje eno od osmih prednostnih področij ukrepanja; poziva h globlji integraciji DOP v program Socrates, zagotovitvi širokega spektra gradiv o DOP v bodočem evropskem središču za samostojno učenje in k oblikovanju evropskega spletnega imenika poslovnih šol in univerz o DOP in trajnostnem razvoju;
Welcomes the commitment to make Education one of eight priority action areas, calls for a deeper integration of CSR in the Socrates programme, the provision of a broad range of CSR materials in the future European Teaching Resource Centre, and the creation of a European online directory of business schools and universities on CSR and sustainable development;
53. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da nadnacionalne družbe s sedežem v EU s proizvodnimi zmogljivostmi v tretjih državah, zlasti v tistih, ki so vključene v shemo GSP+, spoštujejo temeljne standarde ILO, družbene in okoljske konvencije ter mednarodne sporazume, da dosežejo svetovno ravnovesje med gospodarsko rastjo in višjimi socialnimi in okoljskimi standardi;
Asks the Commission to make sure that EU-based transnational companies with production facilities in third countries, in particular those participating in the GSP+ scheme, abide by core ILO standards, social and environmental covenants and international agreements to achieve a world-wide balance between economic growth and higher social and environmental standards;
58. vztraja, da je vloga socialnih partnerjev pomembna pri spodbujanju zaposlovanja žensk in v boju proti diskriminaciji; jih spodbuja, da v okviru DOP prevzamejo pobude za večjo udeležbo žensk v upravnih odborih podjetij, delavskih svetih in organih socialnega dialoga;
Stresses the importance of the role of the social partners in promoting women’s employment and combating discrimination; encourages them to take initiatives, within a CSR framework, to encourage increased participation by women in company boards , works councils and social dialogue bodies;
Prispevek Evrope h globalni družbeni odgovornosti podjetij
Europe's contribution to Global Corporate Social Responsibility
65. poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj podpirajo in spodbujajo spoštovanje temeljnih standardov Mednarodne organizacije dela, ki so dejavnik DOP na področjih, kjer ta delujejo;
Calls on the Member States and Commission to support and promote respect for the core standards of the International Labour Organization (ILO) as a factor in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of undertakings in the areas in which they operate;
68. poziva Komisijo, naj posnema zgled uspešnega čezatlantskega poslovnega dialoga o DOP iz leta 1990, tako da organizira podoben dialog med EU in Japonsko;
Calls on the Commission to build on the success of the Transatlantic Business Dialogue on CSR in the 1990s, by organising a similar exercise between the EU and Japan;
70. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pripomorejo k podpiranju in krepitvi smernic OECD, zlasti z izvajanjem pregleda učinkovitosti evropskih nacionalnih kontaktnih točk in njihove vloge pri učinkovitem posredovanju pri reševanju sporov med interesnimi skupinami; poziva k razvoju modela za evropske kontaktne točke z najboljšo prakso glede njihove zakonske uredite, prepoznavnosti, dostopnosti za vse interesne skupine in obravnave pritožb; poziva k širši razlagi opredelitve naložb pri uporabi smernic OECD, da se zagotovi vključitev vprašanj dobavne verige v izvedbene postopke;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to contribute to supporting and strengthening the OECD Guidelines, in particular by conducting a review of the effectiveness of European national contact points (NCPs) and their role in effectively mediating between stakeholders to resolve conflicts; calls for the development of a model for European NCPs with best practice on their institutional set-up, visibility, accessibility for all stakeholders and handling of complaints; calls for a broad interpretation of the definition of investment in the application of the OECD Guidelines to ensure supply-chain issues are covered under implementation procedures;
73. načeloma pozdravlja razprave v Mednarodni organizaciji za standardizacijo o oblikovanju standarda družbene odgovornosti in poziva k evropskemu zastopanju, da se zagotovi skladnost vseh rezultatov z mednarodnimi standardi in sporazumi in s priložnostjo za razvoj vzporednih metod zunanjega ocenjevanja in certificiranja;
Welcomes in principle the discussions taking place in the International Standards Organisation on creating a standard for social responsibility and calls on European representation to ensure any outcome is consistent with international standards and agreements, and with the opportunity to develop parallel methods of external assessment and certification;
Družbena odgovornost podjetij pomeni, da podjetja prevzamejo bolj neposredno odgovornost za svoj vpliv na družbo in okolje in postanejo bolj odkrito odgovorna ne le do zaposlenih in njihovih sindikatov, ampak tudi do drugih zainteresiranih skupin, vključno z vlagatelji, potrošniki, lokalnimi skupnostmi, okoljskimi in drugimi interesnimi skupinami.
Corporate Social Responsibility represents business taking more direct responsibility for managing its social and environmental impact, becoming more openly accountable not simply to employees and their trade unions, but also to wider 'stakeholders' including investors, consumers, local communities, environmental and other interest groups.
Pojav družbene odgovornosti podjetij je odziv na afere v preteklih dvajsetih letih, v katere so bila pretežno vpletena ameriška velika podjetja, in neposreden odziv v poslovni skupnosti in izven nje, da se neposredno zavzame za spoprijem z izzivi, kot so podnebne spremembe, socialna izključenost in svetovna revščina, ki so postali v obdobju gospodarske globalizacije vedno bolj zaskrbljujoči.
The rise of CSR can be seen as a response to scandals over the past two decades, involving mainly American corporations, as well as a direct response from within and outside the business community to engage directly in meeting challenges such as climate change, social exclusion and world poverty that have become of increasing concern in an era of economic globalisation.
To je že tretje poročilo in resolucija Evropskega parlamenta, ki sem ga sestavil na to temo od leta 1999.
As Rapporteur, this is the third European Parliament report and resolution I have drafted on this subject since 1999.
Ob srečevanju neštetih udeležencev "gibanja" za družbeno odgovornost podjetij me je presenetilo, kako se sodelujoči (v najboljšem primeru) vznemirjeno in vzneseno spoprijemajo s temi izzivi nove dobe in ustvarjajo drugačne vizije podjetij in družbe, njihova pripravljenosti na tveganje pri oblikovanju novih odnosov izven običajnih meja, iskrenega zavzemanja, da s svojim delom v zapletenem in težavnem svetu nekaj spremenijo.
In meeting countless participants in the CSR "movement" I have been struck at how - at best - those involved carry an excitement and enthusiasm about confronting these challenges of a new era, creating a different vision for business in society, a willingness to take risks in forging new relationships beyond traditional boundaries, a genuine commitment to making a difference in a complex and difficult world.
Med zagovorniki in kritiki je še nekaj takih, ki se jim zdi družbena odgovornost podjetij sredstvo za odnose z javnostmi, s katerim se je mogoče izogniti odgovornosti podjetij za družbene in okoljske probleme in jo ovirati.
Amongst supporters and critics, there remain some who see CSR as essentially a public relations tool to evade or obstruct business responsibility for social or environmental problems.
Poleg tega v poslovni skupnosti mnogi sledijo načelu družbene odgovornosti podjetij, ne povezujejo pa se z žargonom in aparatom, povezanim z zdaj samostojno gospodarsko panogo.
In addition there are many in the business community who practise CSR, but who do not relate to the jargon and apparatus associated with what has become an industry in its own right.
Vendar se je izkazalo, da družbena odgovornost podjetij ni modna muha, in so tako poslovneži kot politični voditelji priznali našo lastno odgovornost za njen napredek.
Nevertheless CSR has proved it is neither a fad nor a fashion, with both business and political leaders recognising our own responsibility to move it forward.
Odziv EU na razpravo o družbeni odgovornosti podjetij je nastal ob pozivu Komisije podjetjem sredi 90. let dvajsetega stoletja, naj pomagajo v boju proti socialni izključenosti, iz resolucije Evropskega parlamenta iz leta 1999, ki je vsebovala poziv k oblikovanju zavezujočega kodeksa ravnanja, ki bi predpisal obvezno skladnost podjetij EU s standardi okolja, dela in človekovih pravic po vsem svetu, ter iz poziva predsednikov držav EU podjetjem leta 2000, naj podprejo družbeno odgovornost podjetij v okviru lizbonske agende.
The EU response to the CSR debate emanated from the Commission's call to business to help combat social exclusion in the mid 1990s, the European Parliament resolution of 1999 calling for a binding code of conduct to govern EU companies' environmental, labour and human rights compliance worldwide, together with the 2000 call of EU Heads of State for businesses to support CSR as part of the Lisbon Agenda.
Zelena in Bela knjiga komisije o družbeni odgovornosti podjetij iz začetka 21. stoletja je postavila DOP na dnevni red institucij EU; vzpostavitev evropskega foruma interesnih skupin je omogočila razvoj pristne razprave med interesnimi skupinami, čeprav jo pogosto zavirajo tradicionalni predsodki in način dela socialnih partnerjev na ravni EU.
The Commission Green and White Papers on CSR in the early 2000s put CSR on the agenda for EU institutions, and the setting up of a European Multistakeholder Forum enabled a genuine debate to take place amongst stakeholders, although one frequently frustrated by traditional assumptions and ways of working of social partners at the EU level.
Ti procesi so pospešili razpravo o družbeni odgovornosti podjetij po vsej EU, bili pa so pretežno neuspešni pri določanju, kaj lahko EU naredi, da bi "okrepila vrednost" razprave, ali pri sprejemanju konkretnih ukrepov za spodbujanje odgovornosti podjetij.
These processes succeeded in fostering an EU-wide debate on CSR, but largely failed to address what the EU could itself do to 'add value' to the debate, or to take concrete actions to promote responsible business.
Komisija je z objavo odgovora odlašala še dve leti zaradi pomanjkanja pripravljenosti za soočenje z osnovno razdeljenostjo med tistimi podjetji in drugimi interesnimi skupinami, ki želijo, da bi družbeno odgovornost podjetij določale zahteve po preglednosti, določene z zunanjimi preverjanji in/ali zakonodajo, v kateri imajo interesne skupine izrecno vlogo, in tistimi, ki si predstavljajo družbeno odgovornost podjetij kot dejavnost v rokah podjetij, ki se odvija brez vmešavanja javne politike, z izjemo govorov, tiskovnih konferenc in slavnostnih podelitev nagrad.
There followed successive delays by the Commission in publishing its response over two years, caused by an unwillingness to confront the fundamental polarisation between those amongst business and other stakeholders who want to see CSR subject to transparency requirements laid down through external verification and/or legislation with an explicit role for stakeholders, and those who want to see CSR as a business-only led exercise which should evolve without public policy input beyond speeches, press conferences and awards ceremonies.
Komisija se je nazadnje odločila, da v razpravi ne bo sodelovala, in predstavila sporočilo, ki močno podpira protiregulativni pristop.
The Commission ultimately decided to opt-out from the debate, producing a Communication firmly backing an anti-regulation approach.
Komisarji so se večkrat zasebno srečali s predstavniki izbranih podjetij, da bi se pogajali o besedilu sporočila, kasneje opisanega kot "soglasno sprejetega" s strani podjetij, in se osebno srečali z zainteresiranimi nevladnimi organizacijami, s katerimi so razpravljali o vsebini sporočila šele po njegovi objavi.
Commissioners held a series of private meetings with selected company representatives to negotiate on the text of the Communication, then described it as "agreed" by business, and only met personally with interested NGOs to discuss its contents following on from publication.
Glavni odgovorni uradnik Komisije za področje družbene odgovornosti podjetij je bil s svojega položaja odstavljen, morda zato, da bi se utrla pot temu novemu "soglasju".
The key Commission official responsible for CSR appears to have been moved from his job, perhaps to make way for this new 'consensus'.
V javnost je pricurljalo sporočilo Organizacije evropskih delodajalcev UNICE, v katerem je bilo sporočilo opisano kot "resničen uspeh", saj "ugodnosti za druge interesne strani ... ne bodo imele dejanskega vpliva".
A leaked memo from the European employers organisation UNICE described the Communication as a "true success" because "concessions to other stakeholders... will have no real impact".
To je vzbudilo dvom o pristnosti spremembe v zadnjem trenutku, da se ponovno skliče forum interesnih skupin za družbeno odgovornost podjetij, in pomislek, da je Komisija morda dovolila prekomerno korporacijsko lobiranje v nasprotju z lastno pobudo za preglednost iz novembra 2005.
This has cast doubt on the sincerity of a last-minute change to reconvene the CSR Multistakeholder Forum, and suggests the Commission may have allowed excessive corporate lobbying in contradiction to its own Transparency Initiative of November 2005.
Evropski parlament mora zato sprejeti nekatere strateške odločitve, preden oblikuje svoj odgovor na sporočilo.
The European Parliament therefore has some strategic choices to make in determining its response to the Communication.
Prvič, sama zveza za podjetja mora doseči minimalno raven organiziranosti in preglednosti, ki jo sodelujoča podjetja sama pričakujejo v kateri koli od svojih poslovnih dejavnosti.
First, the "Alliance for Business" must itself achieve minimum levels of organisation and transparency that its company participants would themselves expect in any of their own business activities.
Tudi iz postopkovnih težav Foruma interesnih skupin bi se bilo mogoče kaj naučiti, in slednjemu bi moralo biti omogočeno, da razišče regulativne odzive in o njih razpravlja, da bi se tako zmanjšala razdeljenost v razpravi med prostovoljnim in obveznim pristopom.
Lessons should also be learnt from the procedural difficulties of the Multistakeholder Forum, and it should be able to research and dialogue regulatory responses in order to 'depolarize' the debate between voluntary and mandatory approaches.
Komisija naj postane polnopravni udeleženec obeh razprav, nova osrednja tema za vse akterje pa morajo biti priporočila za posebne ukrepe v okviru politik in programov EU za izvajanje različnih vidikov družbene odgovornosti podjetij.
The Commission should become a full participant in both sets of discussions, and a new focus for all actors should be recommendations for specific actions within EU policies and programmes to implement the different aspects of CSR.
To priložnost je treba izkoristiti za podpiranje obveznih zahtev za lobiste podjetij in druge lobiste pri oblikovanju politik EU, s čimer se dokaže zavezanost Parlament k vključujoči, uravnoteženi in pregledni razpravi.
The opportunity should be used to back mandatory requirements for corporate and other lobbyists in EU policy-making, to demonstrate our Parliament's commitment to inclusive, balanced and transparent debate.
Evropski parlament ne sme zavrniti osredotočenosti Komisije na povezavo med konkurenčnostjo in družbeno odgovornostjo podjetij, deloma zato, ker omogoča novo politično vidnost, deloma pa zato, ker je Komisija v svojem prizadevanju za protiregulativni pristop slabo izkoristila pristop oblikovanja vrednosti k družbeni odgovornosti podjetij, ki ga narekujejo poslovne priložnosti za podjetja EU, da razvijejo nove družbeno in okoljsko inovativne proizvode in postopke.
The European Parliament should not reject the Commission's focus on the link between competitiveness and CSR, partly because it does offer new political visibility, and partly because in pursuing an anti-regulatory approach, the Commission has if anything underplayed the "value creation" approach to CSR driven by the business opportunities for developing new socially and environmentally innovative products and processes by EU companies.
Podjetja, ki se spopadajo s tekmeci, ki se ravnajo po manj strogih standardih družbene odgovornosti podjetij, mala podjetja, ki se spopadajo z mnogovrstnimi in nasprotujočimi si zahtevami podjetij, katerih dobavitelji so, vlagatelji in potrošniki, ki jih informacije, s pomočjo katerih se želijo etično odločati, zbegajo in spravljajo v negotovost – Parlament mora vendarle priznati, da vse to pomeni, da je treba zavrniti pristop Komisije k družbeni odgovornosti podjetij po načelu "kar koli že je dobro" in se vrniti k prej zagovarjanemu pojmu zbliževanja.
However Parliament has to recognise that companies facing competitors who seek to adopt less rigorous CSR standards, small businesses who face multiple and contradictory demands from the companies they supply, investors and consumers who find the information on which they want to make ethical choices confused and uncertain - all mean we should reject the "anything goes" approach to CSR adopted by the Commission, and return to the concept of 'convergence' which they previously advocated.
S podporo v bistvu prostovoljnega pristopa z izbiranjem najboljše pobude za družbeno odgovornost podjetij (čeprav ne med posameznimi podjetji) in zavrnitvijo "enotne mere za vse", lahko sprejmemo pristop, ki je za današnjo razpravo bolj pomemben, ki pa ima še vedno dovolj podpore znotraj poslovne skupnosti.
By backing an essentially voluntaristic approach, "picking winners" amongst CSR initiatives (although not individual companies), and rejecting "one size fits all", we can adopt an approach more relevant to today's debate, but which still carries large support within the business community itself.
Za "zmanjšanje razdeljenosti" v razpravi o obveznem v nasprotju s prostovoljnim pristopom se mora Evropski parlament omejiti na ponavljanje svojih stališč iz let 2002 in 2003, to je nova enotna zakonodaja za vključeno družbeno, okoljsko in finančno poročanje (vsaj večjih) podjetij.
To 'depolarize' our own debate on mandatory versus voluntary approaches, the European Parliament should confine itself to repeating our positions of 2002 and 2003 for a single piece of new legislation for integrated social, environmental and financial reporting by companies - at least for larger companies.
Ne več, ne manj.
No more, no less.
To je dokončna "ustrezna uredba", ki preprosto zahteva preglednost, da se omogočijo prostovoljni tržni odzivi potencialnih novincev med podjetji, investitorjev in potrošnikov.
It is the ultimate "appropriate regulation" simply requiring transparency, so that voluntary, market-based responses are enabled amongst potential company recruits, investors and consumers.
Namesto zagovarjanja dodatne nove zakonodaje lahko Parlament pospeši spodbujanje družbene odgovornosti podjetij s strani EU, tako da uporabi veljavno zakonodajo, politiko in programe EU.
Rather than advocating additional new legislation beyond this, Parliament can instead advance the EU's promotion of CSR by utilising existing EU legislation, policies and programmes.
Tudi poročilo vsebuje te cilje, a Parlament lahko doda nekatere podrobnosti, ki jih Komisija raje ni navedla.
The Communication shares these aims, but Parliament can help write some of the detail that the Commission chooses to avoid.
Podjetja so vabljena, da obravnavajo družbene in okoljske vplive znotraj pregledov poslovanja v treh ločenih uredbah EU o upravljanju družb.
Companies are invited to address social and environmental impacts within the business reviews as part of three separate EU corporate governance regulations.
Pozivati moramo k prizadevanju za boljše ozaveščanje o teh določbah, podpirati učinkovite prenose po vsej EU in se posvetovati o vprašanjih "pomena" in drugih načinih za krepitev teh predpisov v prihodnosti.
We should call for major efforts to raise awareness of these provisions, support effective transposition throughout the EU and consult around issues of 'materiality' and other ways to strengthen these provisions in the future.
Med družbeno odgovornostjo podjetij in vprašanji odgovornosti in upravljanja podjetij ne sme biti umetne razmejitve.
There should be no artificial divide between CSR and issues of corporate accountability and governance.
Za spodbujanje družbene odgovornosti podjetij ob strogem spoštovanju mednarodno sprejetih standardov in pristopa interesnih skupin potekajo na ravni EU pomembne in pristne pobude, ki jih je treba podpreti.
Important and genuine EU-level initiatives are underway to promote CSR in full respect of internationally agreed standards and the multistakeholder approach and these should be supported.