natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
55. poudarja, da mora biti finančna podpora, ki jo odobri Evropska unija, čim bolj vidna, zato mora vsaka institucija, združenje ali dejavnost, ki je upravičenec do subvencije iz programa Unije, o tem obvestiti javnost;
Maintains that the financial support granted by Union needs to be made as visible as possible and hence that every institution, association, or scheme subsidised under a Union programme should be obliged to publicise the aid received;
57. poziva države članice, naj zakonodajo Skupnosti ustrezno in nemudoma prenesejo v svoj pravni red, da bi vsi državljani EU imeli enake pravice, kot jih določa zakonodaja Skupnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj dejavneje zagotavlja izvajanje določb zakonodaje Skupnosti; spodbuja Komisijo, naj sodeluje z vladami držav članic pri obveščanju državljanov o njihovi pravici do dostopa do sodišča in pravnih sredstev, kadar so bile kršene njihove pravice.
Urges the Member States to transpose Community legislation appropriately and promptly in order to ensure that all EU citizens enjoy the same level of rights as conferred by Community legislation; calls on the Commission to ensure more actively that provisions of Community legislation are applied; encourages the Commission to work in partnership with Member States´ governments to inform citizens of their right of access to justice and redress should their rights be infringed.
Komisija je februarja 2006 objavila Belo knjigo o evropski komunikacijski politiki.
In February 2006 the Commission published a White Paper on European communication policy.
Besedilo je nastalo z namenom delovanja proti vplivu zavrnitve ustavne pogodbe na francoskem in nizozemskem referendumu in zaustavitve naraščanja evroskepticizma.
The text was intended to counter the effect produced by the rejection of the Constitutional Treaty in the French and Dutch referendums and halt the general rise of Euro-scepticism.
V beli knjigi je Komisija orisala novo evropsko komunikacijsko politiko, oblikovano za premostitev razkoraka med Unijo in njenimi državljani.
In the White Paper the Commission outlines the thrust of a new European communication policy designed to bridge the divide between the Union and its citizens.
Poročevalec bo v tem poročilu podal svoje pripombe na predlog iz bele knjige Komisije.
In this report the rapporteur will offer his own comments on the proposals put forward in the Commission White Paper.
Opredelitev skupnih načel
Defining common principles
Komisija je predlagala oblikovanje pravil ravnanja pri komuniciranju, kar pomeni, da želi oblikovati skupna pravila za evropske institucije, nacionalne organe itd. ter tako postaviti temelje trdne komunikacijske politike.
The Commission has proposed to establish a code of conduct on communication, that is to say, to draw up common rules for the European institutions, national bodies, and so forth, thereby laying foundations on which to cement communication policies.
Poročevalec meni, da zamisel ni zgolj že izhodiščno napačna, ampak tudi neumestna, saj je slab nadomestek dejanske pravne podlage.
The rapporteur considers that this idea is not only fundamentally mistaken, but also undesirable to the extent that it would create a poor substitute for a genuine legal basis.
Temu pa se na najboljši način ne bomo izognili tako, da bomo komunikacijsko politiko utemeljili s pravili ravnanja, ampak moramo doseči soglasje držav članic in Evropskega sveta, s čimer bomo lahko podali pravno podlago v pravem pomenu besede v smislu člena 308 Pogodbe.
The best way to avoid this pitfall, however, is not to base a communication policy on a code of conduct, but to seek a unanimous decision of the Member States in the European Council, thereby affording a means, under Article 308 of the Treaty, to provide a legal basis in the full sense.
Poleg tega ima lahko opredelitev pravil ravnanja za institucije EU nezaželene posledice zaradi zmanjševanja obsega samostojnih in neodvisnih mnenj.
In addition, laying down rules of conduct to be observed by the EU institutions could lead to adverse consequences reducing the scope for independent and self-determining opinion.
Poročevalec torej meni, da komuniciranja Parlamenta z evropskimi državljani ne bi smel določevati nikakršen pravilnik.
The rapporteur does not, therefore, believe that Parliament should be subject to a code that would determine how it should communicate with European citizens.
Vključevanje državljanov
Empowering citizens
Glede na to, da evropski javni prostor ne obstaja, morajo institucije uporabiti tiste instrumente, ki bodo čim večjemu številu evropskih državljanov omogočili dostop do informacij.
Given that there is no European public sphere, the institutions must employ tools enabling as many European citizens as possible to gain access to information.
Če Unija želi, da se ji prisluhne, mora evropska vprašanja prenesti na nacionalno, regionalno in lokalno raven.
If the Union wishes to be listened to, it has to take European affairs to national, regional, and local level.
Vendar se ne zdi smiselno, da bi državljani postali prvotna gonilna sila participacije in dialoga.
However, it is not sensible to view citizens as the prime movers of participation and dialogue.
Če so državljani slabo obveščeni, jim nima smisla natančno prisluhniti.
It would be pointless to listen carefully to what citizens had to say if they were ill informed.
Da bi njihov prispevek služil kakšnemu namenu, morajo evropske institucije najti način posredovanja vseh informacij, ki jih državljani potrebujejo za udeležbo pri evropskem projektu in identificiranje z njim.
Before their input can serve a purpose, the European institutions have to find ways of passing on all the information that they need to involve themselves in, and identify with, the European project.
Za izoblikovanje mnenja morajo najprej biti posredovane informacije.
Information must come first, otherwise no opinion is possible.
To velja vsaj za kakršno koli uporabno mnenje.
Or at any rate, no useful opinion.
Zato mora informacijsko in komunikacijsko politiko EU usmerjati splošno načelo, da državljanom informacij ne bi bilo treba iskati, ampak bi morale informacije poiskati njih.
That is why EU information and communication policy must be governed by the general principle that it is not citizens who should have to go looking for information, but information that should come looking for citizens.
Sodelovanje z mediji in delo z novimi tehnologijami:
Working with the media and new technologies
Bela knjiga pretirano poudarja zamisel, da se dialog in komunikacija z državljani lahko usklajujeta preko pobud institucij.
The White Paper overemphasises the idea that dialogue and communication with citizens can be coordinated through initiatives by the institutions.
Posledično se bolj zanaša na nove tehnologije kot na tradicionalne množične medije.
It consequently relies more on new technologies than on the traditional mass media.
Občasno se zdi, da podcenjuje vpliv množičnih medijev na družbo.
At times it appears to underestimate the impact that the mass media have on society.
Poročevalec meni, da je treba sestaviti seznam prednostnih ukrepov ter se osredotočiti, recimo, na boljše pogoje dela za novinarje v evropskih institucijah, usposabljanje strokovnjakov s področja informiranja, boljše metode neposrednega komuniciranja itd.
The rapporteur believes that a list of priority measures should be drawn up, focusing, for example, on better working conditions for journalists in the European institutions, training for information professionals, better direct communication methods, and so on.
Komisija predlaga oblikovanje mreže nacionalnih strokovnjakov za raziskave javnega mnenja kot pomoči pri izmenjavi najboljših praks in razvijanju sinergij.
The Commission is proposing to set up a network of national opinion research experts to help exchange good practice and develop synergy.
Poročevalec pa meni, da bi bilo bolje bolj usklajeno uporabiti obstoječe vire, tako da bi jih čim bolje izkoristili.
The rapporteur, however, believes that it would be better to use existing resources in a more coordinated way so as to derive maximum benefit.
Informacije in dobre prakse je mogoče izmenjevati brez ustanovitve Observatorija za evropsko javno mnenje.
Information and good practice can be exchanged without setting up a new European public opinion observatory.
Kratkoročno bi bila ustanovitev observatorija pravzaprav vprašljiva rešitev, saj bi bilo treba, preden bi se lotili takšnega podviga, najprej učinkovito uporabiti že zbrane podatke.
Indeed, setting up the observatory would be a questionable course of action in the short term, since the data already gathered ought to be turned fully to account before embarking on a venture of that kind.
Za države članice EU je bistveno, da sodelujejo v informacijski in komunikacijski politiki EU.
It is vital for Member States to be involved in EU information and communication policy.
Brez njih je skoraj nemogoče posredovati kakršno koli sporočilo.
Without them, it would be virtually impossible for any message to get through.
Za pozitiven odziv državljanov, na katerih pomisleke se odzivamo, je treba večjo pozornost nameniti temu, kar je povedano.
Attention needs to focus to a greater extent on what is said, so as to ensure that messages strike a chord with citizens by addressing their different concerns.
Razložiti moramo znati, kaj lahko Evropa stori za posamezne državljane.
We need to succeed in explaining what Europe can do for each and every citizen.
Najti moramo način bolj odločnega poudarjanja informacijske in komunikacijske politike na regionalni in lokalni ravni.
We have to find a way to bring our weight to bear more decisively on information and communication policy at regional and local level.
Zainteresirane strani, kot so politične stranke, morajo znati mobilizirati državljane, da podprejo evropsko politiko, torej pri tem igrajo ključno vlogo.
Stakeholders such as political parties have to be able to mobilise citizens in support of European politics and accordingly have a crucial role to play.
Poročevalec je mnenja, da bi morali Parlament, Komisija in Svet okrepiti tristranski dialog in v ta namen bolje usklajevati svoje dejavnosti.
The rapporteur believes that Parliament, the Commission, and the Council should intensify their three-cornered dialogue and, to that end, coordinate their activities more closely.
Službam za informiranje in komuniciranje Komisije in Parlamenta je za zbiranje zamisli na razpolago medinstitucionalna skupina za informiranje.
The only forum that the Commission’s and Parliament’s information and communication services have for pooling their ideas is the Interinstitutional Group on Information.
Njeno osnovna naloga je določitev prednostnih nalog za program PRINCE.
Its basic task is to set the priorities for the PRINCE programme.
Pobude, ki jih ta program ne pokriva, se obravnavajo kot posebni ukrepi in se izvajajo na pobudo ali Komisije ali Parlamenta, odvisno od primera.
Any initiatives not covered by that programme are treated as specific measures and pursued at the instigation of either the Commission or Parliament, as the case may be.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da bi moral program PRINCE zaobjeti več prednostnih področij in bi posamezne institucije posebej ukrepale le, kjer je to potrebno.
The rapporteur believes that the PRINCE programme should encompass more priority areas and each institution should take specific action only as and where necessary.
Medinstitucionalna skupina pa bi morala biti predvsem političnega značaja, njeno članstvo pa zmanjšano, da bi delovala učinkoviteje.
The institutional group should, moreover, be primarily political in character, and its membership scaled down to make for greater operating efficiency.
o beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki
on the White paper on a European communication policy
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za kulturo in izobraževanje kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Culture and Education, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker bi morali biti pravica do obveščanja in svoboda izražanja v osrčju demokracije v Evropi ter podpirati politične sisteme na evropski in nacionalni ravni, kar pomeni, da bi morale biti informacije na voljo javnosti, kolikor je mogoče,
A. whereas the right to information and freedom of expression should be at the heart of democracy in Europe and underpin the political systems at European and national levels and thus, insofar as is possible, information should be made available to the public,
B. ker je demokratična udeležba temeljni kamen političnega procesa in bi morala neposredno vplivati na oblikovanje politik Unije,
B. whereas democratic participation is a cornerstone of the political process and should have a direct bearing on the Union's policy formulation,
C. ker sta preglednost in odprtost osnovna pogoja za komunikacijo, ta pa je dvosmerni dialog z evropskimi državljani in je bistvena sestavina demokracije, nepogrešljiva za spodbujanje javne razprave,
C. whereas transparency and openness are preconditions for communication and such communication is a two-way dialogue with European citizens, which is an essential element of democracy and indispensable for fostering public debate,
D. ker je namen "obdobja za razmislek", da postane Unija bolj demokratična in učinkovitejša ter da se ponovno poveže s svojimi državljani,
D. whereas the aim of a 'period of reflection' is to make the Union more democratic and effective and to 'reconnect' it with the citizens,
E. ker je treba poudariti, da so evropska vprašanja in "dodana vrednost" zakonodaje Skupnosti redko priznana v razpravah na nacionalni ravni in si nacionalni politiki pogosto lastijo zasluge za evropske "zgodbe o uspehu", nasprotno pa ne varčujejo z negativnimi ocenami EU, pogosto zaradi neuspehov pri politiki na nacionalni ravni,
E. pointing out that European issues and the "added value" of Community legislation are rarely acknowledged during national debates, with national politicians often taking credit for European "success stories", while, conversely, national politicians are quick to criticise the EU, often for failures in policy which arise at national level,
F. ker je treba opozoriti na sklepe predsedstva konference predsednikov parlamentov Evropske unije (z dne 6. in 7. maja 2005), ki je pozvalo nacionalne parlamente k vsakoletni razpravi, po možnosti na plenarnem zasedanju, o letnem zakonodajnem in delovnem programu Komisije,
F. drawing attention to the Presidency Conclusions of the Conference of the Speakers of European Union Parliaments (6 and 7 May 2005), which called upon the national parliaments to hold a debate, preferably in plenary session, each year on the annual legislative and work programme of the European Commission,
3. meni, da bi bilo treba objaviti dnevne rede in dokumente Sveta, Komisije in odborov Evropskega parlamenta, pa tudi lahko razumljive osnovne informacije; poudarja, da bi te informacije morale biti lahko dostopne za javnost, zlasti preko interneta, tiskanja teh dokumentov in neposrednega prenosa sej, ki jih je mogoče gledati tudi naknadno;
Considers that all Council, Commission and European Parliament committees' agendas and documents, as well as easily understandable background information, should be published; points out that this information should be easily accessible to the public, notably via the Internet, through publication of such documents and the live and retrievable transmission of meetings;
6. vzpodbuja države članice, naj v nacionalne razprave dodajo evropsko dimenzijo ter tako državljane opozorijo na evropski politični program;
Encourages the Member States to build a European dimension into national debates, thus bringing the European agenda to the attention of citizens;
8. poziva države članice, naj zakonodajo Skupnosti ustrezno in nemudoma prenesejo v svoj pravni red, da bi vsi državljani EU imeli enake pravice, kot jih določa zakonodaja Skupnosti;poziva Komisijo, naj dejavneje zagotavlja izvajanje določb zakonodaje Skupnosti; spodbuja Komisijo, naj sodeluje z vladami držav članic pri obveščanju državljanov o njihovi pravici do dostopa do sodišča in pravnih sredstev, kadar so bile kršene njihove pravice.
Urges the Member States to transpose Community legislation appropriately and promptly in order to ensure that all EU citizens enjoy the same level of rights as conferred by Community legislation; calls on the Commission to ensure more actively that provisions of Community legislation are applied; encourages the Commission to work in partnership with Member States´ governments to inform citizens of their right of access to justice and redress should their rights be infringed.
Bela knjiga o evropski komunikacijski politiki
White paper on a European communication policy
4. poudarja, da je treba sklicati medparlamentarne forume o prihodnosti Evrope, pri čemer bo eden izmed njih sklican ob 50. obletnici rimske pogodbe; zahteva, da se pri evropski komunikacijski politiki upoštevajo razprave na ravni predstavnikov evropskega prebivalstva;
Points to the importance of convening interparliamentary forums on the future of Europe, one of which will be meeting to mark the 50th anniversary of the Treaties of Rome; calls, as far as European communication policy is concerned, for the discussions among the representatives of the European people to be taken into account;
9. poudarja, da je treba prilagoditi in pospešiti pripravo strategije in vsebino bele knjige glede na razprave, ki potekajo v evropski družbi in med državami članicami;
Points to the need to adapt and further the strategies and substantive areas set out in the White Paper, taking into account the ongoing debates in European society and among the Member States;
11. poudarja, da mora biti finančna podpora, ki jo odobri Evropska unija, čim bolj vidna, zato mora vsaka institucija, združenje ali dejavnost, ki je upravičenec do subvencije iz programa Unije, o tem obvestiti javnost;
Maintains that the financial support granted by Union needs to be made as visible as possible and hence that every institution, association, or scheme subsidised under a Union programme should be obliged to publicise the aid received;
13. obžaluje, da trenutna informacijska politika ne izpolnjuje svojega cilja in ne doseže evropskih državljanov; poudarja, da se je treba zato zavzeti za popolnoma nove rešitve, zlasti za specifične novinarske vsebine na televiziji; se strinja z idejo o obveščanju o Evropi po modelu programov "Universum";
Regrets that the present information policy is failing to serve its purpose and not reaching European citizens; maintains, therefore, that fundamentally new departures are needed, in particular in the form of specific journalistic coverage designed for television; supports, therefore, the idea of European news modelled on Universum programmes;
16. izpostavlja ključno vlogo medijev pri komuniciranju o evropskih zadevah in vztraja, da je treba vzpostaviti posebne oblike sodelovanja z njimi ob strogem spoštovanju njihove neodvisnosti in uredniške avtonomije; meni, da je treba bistveno povečati razpoložljiva sredstva za izobraževanje novinarjev, specializiranih za evropske zadeve, zlasti na ravni regionalnega in lokalnega tiska; razen tega meni, da je obveščanje javnosti s strani institucij dober način, da se javnosti predstavi središče evropske politike, in je torej pomembna tema v razpravi z mediji;
Stresses the essential role the media play in communication on European issues and insists on the need to establish specific forms of cooperation with this sector, scrupulously respecting its independence and editorial autonomy; considers that funding for the training of journalists specialising in European affairs should be visibly increased, particularly for the local and regional press; considers also that institutional publicity is a key way to project the image of Europe’s political centre to the public at large and hence an important subject for discussion with the media;
18. meni, da bi razvoj evropske uprave na lokalni ravni, ki bi bila sposobna podpreti številne že obstoječe informacijske točke Evropske unije, pripomogel k vzpostavitvi močnih neposrednih povezav med Unijo in njenimi državljani, še zlasti z izboljšanjem dostopa državljanov do evropskih pobud in programov, ki jih zadevajo; meni, da imajo pri tem pomembno vlogo informacijske pisarne Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta; v zvezi s tem ocenjuje, da je treba ponovno temeljito razmisliti o dosedanjem delu teh informacijskih pisarn, saj njihova politika odnosov z javnostmi ne upošteva interesov državljanov in bi se sredstva za ta namen lahko izkoristila mnogo učinkovitejše; zato želi, da bi pisarne imele bolj aktiven in manj birokratski značaj;
Considers that the development of a local European administration, able to support the numerous existing European Union information points, would help to form strong direct links between the Union and its citizens, in particular by improving citizens’ access to the European initiatives and programmes that affect them; believes that the Commission’s and Parliament’s information offices in the Member States play an important role in this connection; sees a need in this connection for a thoroughgoing review and rethink of the work carried out to date in the Member States by these information offices, since their public relations activities do not appeal to citizens and the resources earmarked for them could be used far more efficiently; feels, therefore, that they should be more political and less bureaucratic;
Bela knjiga o evropski komunikacijski politiki
White Paper on a European communication policy
Bela knjiga o evropski komunikacijski politiki
Report on the White Paper on a European communication policy
o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije v okviru EVOP
on the implementation of the European Security Strategy in the context of the ESDP
PE 372.113v01-00
PE 372.113v03-00
MANJŠINSKO MNENJE GUE/NGL - KONFEDERALNA SKUPINA EVROPSKE ZDRUŽENE LEVICE – ZELENE NORDIJSKE LEVICE 19
MINORITY OPINION OF THE GUE/NGL - CONFEDERAL GROUP OF THE EUROPEAN UNITED LEFT-NORDIC GREEN LEFT.........................................................20
– ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije, ki jo je 12. decembra 2003 sprejel Evropski svet,
– having regard to the European Security Strategy adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003,
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo, podpisane 29. oktobra 2004 v Rimu,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, signed in Rome on 29 October 2004,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskih svetov 16. in 17. junija ter 15. in 16. decembra 2005, zlasti poročil predsedstva o evropski varnostni in obrambni politiki (EVOP),
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the European Councils of 16/17 June and 15/16 December 2005, and in particular to the Presidency reports on ESDP,
ob upoštevanju strategije EU proti širjenju orožja za množično uničevanje, ki jo je Svet potrdil 9. decembra 2003,
having regard to the EU Strategy against proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, endorsed by the Council on 9 December 2003,
– ob upoštevanju poročila z naslovom „Za evropsko enoto civilne zaščite: europe aid “, ki ga je maja 2006 predstavil nekdanji komisar Michel Barnier,
– having regard to the report entitled 'For a European civil protection force: europe aid' presented in May 2006 by former Commissioner Michel Barnier,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z 2. februarja 2006 o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in temeljnih usmeritvah SZVP, vključno s finančnimi posledicami za skupni proračun Evropske unije – 2004
– having regard to its resolution of 2 February 2006 on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities - 2004
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6–0366/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0366/2006 ),