natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice zagotovijo ustrezno varstvo in jamstvo pravic tožencev.
Member States shall ensure that the rights of defendants shall be duly protected and guaranteed.
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko zadevni imetniki pravic intelektualne lastnine ali njihovi predstavniki ter strokovnjaki prispevajo k preiskavam, ki jih opravljajo skupne preiskovalne enote v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji iz člena 3.
The Member States must ensure that the holders of intellectual property rights concerned, or their representatives, and experts, are allowed to assist the investigations carried out by joint investigation teams into the offences referred to in Article 3.
Med preiskavo in sodnim postopkom se v celoti spoštuje člen 8 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, ki zadeva varstvo osebnih podatkov, in Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in prostem pretoku takih podatkov 1 .
Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which concerns the protection of personal data, and Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data 1 shall be fully respected in the course of investigations and judicial proceedings.
Člen 8 listine določa, da ima „vsakdo [ima] pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov, ki se nanašajo nanj“ in da se morajo „osebni podatki [se morajo] obdelovati pošteno, za natančno določene namene in na podlagi privolitve prizadete osebe ali na drugi legitimni podlagi, določeni z zakonom.
Article 8 of the Charter declares that 'Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her', and 'Such data must be processed fairly for specified purposes and on the basis of the consent of the person concerned or some other legitimate basis laid down by law.
Spremenjeni predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskih ukrepih za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine
The amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
Kazenski ukrepi za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine
Criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
Mnenje pripravil
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s)
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 21
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 24
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu (KOM(2004) 0718)
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0718 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2), člena 61(c) in člena 67(5) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerimi je Komisija Parlamentu predložila predlog ( C6-0154/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 61(c) and 67(5) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0154/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0074/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0074/2007 ),
Besedilo predloga Komisije
Text proposed by the Commission
Predlogi sprememb, ki jih vlaga Parlament
Amendments by Parliament
(2) Evropski svet v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 je zahteval, glede na boljši dostop do pravice v Evropi, kot drugo možnost, da države članice ustvarijo posebne sodne postopke.
(2) The European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 called for, in relation to better access to justice in Europe, for alternative, extra-judicial procedures to be created by Member States.
Zlasti je treba vključiti načela iz priporočila Komisije 2001/310/ES s 4. aprila 2001 o načelih za izvensodna telesa, ki so vključena v sporazumno rešitev potrošniških sporov 1 .
In particular, it should incorporate the principles set out in Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC of 4 April 2001 on the principles for out-of-court bodies involved in the consensual resolution of consumer disputes 1 .
Obstoječo zakonodajo o mediaciji v potrošniških sporih predstavljata dve priporočili Komisije, ki določata številna načela, ki jih morajo izvensodna telesa, vključena v alternativno reševanje sporov, upoštevati (priporočilo 1998/257 in priporočilo 2001/310).
The current legislation on consumer mediation consists of two Commission recommendations setting out a number of principles which out-of-court bodies involved in consumer ADR should comply with (Recommendation 1998/257 and Recommendation 2001/310).
Ta načela so zelo pomembna za uspeh alternativnega reševanja sporov.
Those principles are very important to ensure the success of consumer ADR.
Zato menimo, da bi bilo treba v predlagano direktivo vključiti načela preglednosti, nepristranskosti, učinkovitosti in poštenosti, ki so vključena v priporočilo 2001/310 (sporazumno reševanje sporov potrošnikov).
We therefore consider that the principles of transparency, impartiality, effectiveness and fairness included in Recommandation 2001/310 (consensual resolution of consumer disputes) should be incorporated in the proposed directive.
(6) Mediacija lahko zagotavlja stroškovno učinkovito in hitro izvensodno reševanje sporov v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah s pomočjo postopkov, prilagojenih potrebam strank.
(6) Mediation can provide a cost-efficient and quick extra-judicial resolution of disputes in civil and commercial matters through processes tailored to the needs of the parties.
Poravnave, dosežene preko mediacije , bodo bolj verjetno izvršene prostovoljno in bodo bolj verjetno ohranile prijateljski in trajnostni odnos med strankami.
Settlement a greements reached through mediation are more likely to be enforced voluntarily and are more likely to preserve an amicable and sustainable relationship between the parties.
Te koristi postanejo še izrazitejše v situacijah, ki prikazujejo čezmejne elemente.
These benefits become even more pronounced in situations displaying cross-border elements.
Sporazumi, doseženi z mediacijo, bodo bolj verjetno izvršeni prostovoljno in bodo bolj verjetno ohranili prijateljski in trajnostni odnos med strankami.
A greements resulting from mediation are more likely to be enforced voluntarily and are more likely to preserve an amicable and sustainable relationship between the parties.
(Ta predlog spremembe velja za celotno zakonodajno besedilo; njegovo sprejetje zahteva tehnične prilagoditve v vsem besedilu).
(This amendment applies to the entire legislative text under consideration; its adoption requires technical adaptations throughout the text.)
(7a) Spodbuja se države članice, naj uporabijo določbe te direktive tudi za zadeve brez mednarodne razsežnosti, zlasti da se tako olajša pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
(7a) Member States are encouraged to apply the provisions of this Directive also to internal cases with a view notably to facilitating the proper functioning of the internal market.
Predvsem pa dejstvo, da so določbe direktive omejene na primere s čezmejnimi posledicami, ne bi smelo omejevati določb nacionalnega prava, ki sedaj predpisujejo izvršljivost sporazumov, doseženih z mediacijo, tajnost mediacije ali učinek mediacije na zastaralne roke tudi v primerih, ki jih ne zajema ta direktiva.
Moreover, the fact that the provisions of the Directive are expressed as being limited to cases having cross-border implications should not have the effect of limiting rules of national law that currently provide for the enforceability of agreements resulting from mediation, the confidentiality of mediation or the effect of mediation on limitation and prescription periods also in cases not covered by the Directive.
(8) Ta direktiva mora zajeti postopke, kjer dvema ali več strankam v sporu pomaga mediator, da se doseže prijateljski sporazum glede poravnave spora, a izključuje postopke sodne narave kot so arbitraža, načrti varuha človekovih pravic, načrti pritožb potrošnikov, ugotovitve strokovnjakov ali postopki, ki jih upravljajo telesa, ki izdajajo uradna priporočila, če so ta zakonsko zavezujoča ali ne, kar zadeva reševanje spora.
(8) This directive should cover processes where two or more parties to a dispute are assisted by a mediator to reach an amicable agreement on the settlement of the dispute, but exclude processes of an adjudicatory nature such as arbitration, ombudsmen schemes, consumer complaint schemes, expert determination or processes administered by bodies issuing a formal recommendation, be it legally binding or not, as to the resolution of the dispute.
(8) Ta direktiva mora zajeti postopke, kjer dvema ali več strankam v čezmejnem sporu pomaga mediator, da se doseže prijateljski sporazum glede poravnave spora, a izključuje postopke, kot so predpogodbena pogajanja, in postopke sodne narave kot so arbitraža, sodni poravnalni načrti, načrti varuha človekovih pravic, načrti pritožb potrošnikov, ugotovitve strokovnjakov ali postopki, ki jih upravljajo telesa, ki izdajajo uradna priporočila, če so ta zakonsko zavezujoča ali ne, kar zadeva reševanje spora.
(8) This Directive should cover processes where two or more parties to a cross-border dispute are assisted by a mediator to reach an amicable agreement on the settlement of the dispute, but exclude processes such as pre-contractual negotiations or processes of an adjudicatory nature such as arbitration, judicial conciliation schemes, ombudsman schemes, consumer complaint schemes, expert determination or processes administered by bodies issuing a formal recommendation, be it legally binding or not, as to the resolution of the dispute.
Direktiva mora prav tako zajeti primere, ko sodišče stranke napoti k mediatorju ali ko mediacijo predpisuje nacionalna zakonodaja, vseeno pa ostaja v veljavi načelo, da mora biti uporaba mediacije prostovoljna in da nacionalna zakonodaja, ki predpisuje mediacijo kot obvezno ali kot razlog za spodbude oziroma sankcije, strankam ne sme preprečevati uveljavljanja pravice dostopa do sodnega sistema.
Cases where a court refers parties to mediation or in which national law prescribes mediation should also be covered, although the principle remains that mediation is a voluntary process and national legislation making the use of mediation compulsory or subject to incentives or sanctions should not prevent parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system.
Nadalje mora direktiva zaobjeti mediacijo, ki jo vodi sodnik, ki mu ni dodeljen noben izmed sodnih postopkov, povezanih s sporno zadevo ali zadevami.
Furthermore, mediation conducted by a judge who is not responsible for any judicial proceedings relating to the matter or matters in dispute should also come within the scope of this Directive.
Direktiva pa se ne nanaša na poskuse sodišča ali sodnika, ki mu je bil primer dodeljen, da reši spor v okviru sodnih postopkov, povezanih s sporom, ali na primere, v katerih sodišče ali sodnik, ki mu je bil primer dodeljen, zahteva pomoč ali nasvet pristojne osebe.
Nevertheless, this Directive does not extend to attempts made by the court or judge seised to settle a dispute in the context of judicial proceedings concerning that dispute or to cases in which the court or judge seised requests assistance or advice from a competent person.
(9) Kar zadeva učinkovitost mediacije v zvezi z zastaralnimi roki in kako bo zaščitena zaupnost mediatorja v vseh naknadnih sodnih postopkih, je nujna minimalna stopnja združljivosti pravil, ki urejajo civilni postopek.
(9) A minimum degree of compatibility of civil procedural rules is necessary as concerns the effect of mediation on limitation periods and how the confidentiality of the mediator will be protected in any subsequent judicial proceedings.
Treba je upoštevati tudi možnost sodišča, da stranke napoti na mediacijo, medtem ko ohrani načelo, da je mediacija prostovoljni postopek.
The possibility for the court to refer the parties to mediation should also be covered, while retaining the principle that mediation is a voluntary process.
(9) Pri vprašanju, kako zaščititi zaupnost mediacije v vseh naknadnih civilnih in gospodarskih sodnih postopkih oziroma postopkih arbitraže , je v luči pomena zaupnosti nujna minimalna stopnja združljivosti pravil, ki urejajo civilni postopek.
(9) Given the importance of confidentiality in the mediation process, a minimum degree of compatibility of civil procedural rules is necessary with regard to how the confidentiality of the mediation is protected in any subsequent civil and commercial, judicial or arbitration proceedings.
Treba je upoštevati tudi možnost sodišča, da stranke opozori na mediacijo, medtem ko ohrani načelo, da je mediacija prostovoljni postopek.
The possibility for the court to draw the parties' attention to mediation should also be covered, while retaining the principle that mediation is a voluntary process.
Prav tako je treba v civilnih postopkih zagotoviti minimalno stopnjo usklajenosti pravil, ki zadevajo učinke mediacije na zastaralne roke.
It is also necessary to provide for a minimum degree of compatibility of civil procedural rules with regard to the effect of mediation on limitation and prescription periods.
(10) Mediacija se ne bi smela šteti kot slabša možnost od sodnih postopkov v smislu, da je doseganje poravnav odvisno od dobre volje strank.
(10) Mediation should not be regarded as a poorer alternative to judicial proceedings in the sense that settlement agreements are dependant on the good will of the parties for their enforcement.
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da vse države članice zagotovijo postopek, s katerim lahko sodišče ali javna oblast potrdi poravnavo s sodbo, sklepom ali javnim pooblastilom .
It is therefore necessary to ensure that all Member States provide for a procedure whereby a settlement agreement can be confirmed in a judgment , decision or authentic instrument by a court or public authority.
(10) Mediacija se ne bi smela šteti kot slabša možnost od sodnih postopkov v smislu, da je doseganje sporazumov odvisno od dobre volje strank.
(10) Mediation should not be regarded as a poorer alternative to judicial proceedings in the sense that agreements reached by mediation are dependent on the goodwill of the parties for their enforcement.
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da lahko stranke, ki so sklenile pisni sporazum, zahtevajo, da se le tega prizna in izvršuje v tolikšni meri, kolikor to omogoča zakonodaja države članice, v kateri je bila prošnja za priznanje in/ali izvrševanje poravnave vložena.
It is therefore necessary to ensure that parties to a written agreement reached in mediation may request that its content be made enforceable in so far as enforceability of such content is possible under the law of the Member State in which the request for enforcement is made.
Vsebina poravnave lahko postane izvršljiva s sodbo ali sklepom sodišča ali če sodišče ali druga pristojna oblast potrdita njeno veljavnost v skladu z zakonodajo države članice, kjer je bila prošnja vložena.
The content of such an agreement may be rendered enforceable in a judgment or decision or by an authentic act by a court or by another competent authority in accordance with the law of the Member State where the request is made .
(11) Takšna možnost omogoči, da se poravnava prizna in izvrši v celotni Uniji, pod pogoji, določenimi v instrumentih Skupnosti o medsebojnem priznavanju in izvršitvi sodb in odločb.
(11) Such a possibility will allow for a settlement agreement to be recognised and enforced across the Union , under the conditions laid down by Community instruments on mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments and decisions .
(11) Vsebina sporazuma, doseženega z mediacijo, izvršljivega v eni državi članici, bo priznana in izvršljiva v drugi državi članici v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo Skupnosti ali nacionalno zakonodajo, na primer na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah 1 ali na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 z dne 27. novembra 2003 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v zakonskih sporih in v sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo 2 .
(11) The content of a agreement reached by mediation which is rendered enforceable in a Member State will be recognised and declared enforceable in the other Member States in accordance with applicable Community or national law, for example on the basis of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters 1 or Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility 2 .
2 UL L 338, 23.12.2003, str.
2 OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p.
(11a) Čeprav direktiva vključuje mediacijo na področju družinskega prava, zajema le pravice, do katerih so stranke upravičene po zakonodaji države članice, v kateri mediacija poteka.
(11a) Although this Directive covers mediation in family law matters, it extends only to the rights available to the parties under the law of the Member State in which mediation takes place.
(13) Cilj teh mehanizmov in ukrepov, ki jih opredelijo države članice in lahko prispevajo k trgovinskim rešitvam, je ohranjanje prožnosti postopka mediacije in zasebne avtonomije strank.
(13) These mechanisms and measures, which shall be defined by the Member States and may include having recourse to market-based solutions, should aim at preserving the flexibility of the mediation process and the private autonomy of the parties.
Komisija spodbuja samoregulativne ukrepe na ravni Skupnosti preko, na primer, razvoja Evropskega kodeksa ravnanja, ki obravnava ključne dejavnike postopka mediacije .
The Commission shall encourage self-regulatory measures at Community level through, for example, development of a European code of conduct addressing key aspects of the mediation process .
(13) Cilj teh mehanizmov in ukrepov, ki bi jih morale opredeliti države članice in lahko prispevajo k trgovinskim rešitvam, je ohranjanje prožnosti postopka mediacije in zasebne avtonomije strank.
(13) These mechanisms and measures, which should be defined by the Member States and may include having recourse to market-based solutions, should aim at preserving the flexibility of the mediation process and the private autonomy of the parties.
Komisija bi morala spodbujati samoregulativne ukrepe na ravni Skupnosti.
The Commission should encourage self-regulatory measures at Community level.
Države članice pa bi morale pospeševati in spodbujati uporabo evropskega kodeksa ravnanja mediatorjev, ki ga bo Komisija objavila v seriji C Uradnega lista Evropske unije, ter zagotoviti, da je kakovost mediacije zajamčena z merili, naštetimi in opredeljenimi v priporočilu Komisije 98/257/ES z dne 30. marca 1998 o načelih za izvensodna telesa, ki so vključena v sporazumno rešitev potrošniških sporov 1 in priporočilu Komisije 2001/310/ES: nepristranskost, preglednost, učinkovitost, pravičnost, zastopanost, neodvisnost, kontradiktornost postopka, zakonitost in svoboda.
For their part, the Member States should encourage and promote the application of the European Code of Conduct for Mediators, which the Commission will publish in the C Series of the Official Journal of the European Union, while ensuring that the quality of mediation is guaranteed by the criteria listed and defined in Commission Recommendation 98/257/EC of 30 March 1998 on the principles applicable to the bodies responsible for out-of-court settlement of consumer disputes 1 and Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC: impartiality, transparency, efficiency, fairness, representation, independence, adversarial procedure, legality and freedom.
Enako bi države članice morale spodbujati uporabo načel, določenih v priporočilu 2001/310/ES v mediacijah med podjetji in potrošniki.
Likewise, in business-to-consumer mediation, the Member States should promote the application of the principles set out in Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC.
Nadalje bi države članice morali spodbujati razvoj sistema certificiranja nacionalnih teles, ki nudijo tečaje usposabljanja za mediatorje.
Furthermore, the Member States should encourage the development of a system of certification of national bodies offering training courses in mediation.
1 UL L 115, 17.4.1998, str.
1 OJ L 115, 17.4.1998, p.
(17) V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, ki je priloga k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, sta Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sporočili svojo željo sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te direktive. / V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, ki je priloga k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Združeno kraljestvo in Irska ne sodelujeta pri sprejetju odločbe, kar ni zavezujoče za tiste države članice.]
(17) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom and Ireland have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Directive. / In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom and Ireland do not take part in the adoption of this Directive, which is therefore not binding on those Member States.
(17) V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, ki je priloga k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, sta Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sporočili svojo željo sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te direktive.
(17) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom and Ireland have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Directive.
Cilj te direktive je olajšati dostop do reševanja sporov s spodbujanjem uporabe mediacije in zagotavljanjem trdnega odnosa med mediacijo in sodnimi postopki.
The objective of this directive is to facilitate access to dispute resolution by promoting the use of mediation and by ensuring a sound relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings.
Cilj te direktive je olajšati dostop do reševanja sporov in promovirati sporazumne rešitve sporov s spodbujanjem uporabe mediacije in zagotavljanjem uravnoteženega odnosa med mediacijo in sodnimi postopki.
The objective of this Directive is to facilitate access to dispute resolution and to promote the amicable settlement of disputes by encouraging the use of mediation and ensuring a balanced relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings.
Ta direktiva velja v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah.
This directive shall apply in civil and commercial matters.
Ta direktiva velja v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah.
This Directive shall apply in civil and commercial matters.
Ne vključuje pa dohodkovnih, carinskih ali upravnih zadev ali odgovornosti države kot nosilke oblasti („acta iure imperii“) za njena dejanja in opustitve dejanj.
It shall not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters or to the liability of the State for acts and omissions in the exercise of State authority (acta iure imperii).
V tej direktivi pomeni "država članica" države članice, razen Danske.
In this directive, “Member State” shall mean Member States with the exception of Denmark.