natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalec meni, da člani vlakovnega osebja nesporno prispevajo k varnosti vlakov.
Your rapporteur believes that crew members indisputably contribute to the safety of trains.
Za takšno osebje bi morala biti obvezna spričevala in glede te točke poročevalec želi doseči kompromis s Svetom.
European certification should be required for such staff and your rapporteur wishes to reach a compromise with the Council on this point.
Posledično, poročevalec predlaga razširitev vsebine direktive, da bi ta vključevala člane vlakovnega osebja, ki prispevajo k zagotavljanju varnosti na vlakih (predlog spremembe 3) in – veljalo bi dodati – so zajeti v člen 27 direktive.
Consequently, your rapporteur proposes extending the subject of the Directive to include crew members who help to ensure safety on trains (Amendment 3), who, it should be added, are covered by Article 27 of the Directive.
Poleg tega poročevalec predlaga novo besedilo člena 27 in izdajanje spričeval za člane vlakovnega osebja, katerih naloge so trenutno podrobno opredeljene v Prilogi VIII direktive.
Furthermore, your rapporteur proposes a new wording for Article 27, and certification for crew members whose tasks are now specified in Annex VIII of the Directive.
· Vprašanje stroškov usposabljanja, ki jih krije prevoznik po zgodnjem odhodu strojevodje
· The question of training costs borne by the undertaking following the early departure of a driver
Usposabljanje strojevodij izvajajo organi, ki jih za to pooblastijo nacionalne varnostne oblasti in Evropska agencija, z možnostjo, da prevozniki v železniškem prometu nadaljujejo z zagotavljanjem usposabljanja za strojevodje, kot to velja danes v večini držav članic.
The training of train drivers will be carried out by bodies approved by national safety authorities and the European Agency, with the possibility therefore that railway undertakings will continue to provide training for drivers, as is the case today in most Member States.
V skladu s predlogom spremembe, ki ga je Parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi, poročevalec meni, da je treba, glede na konkurenčno okolje v katerem se nahajamo ter da bi se izognili nesmiselnim in dragim sporom, vključiti varnostno klavzulo, da bi se zaščitile naložbe prevoznikov v železniškem prometu.
In line with the amendment adopted by Parliament at first reading, your rapporteur believes that, given the competitive environment we are in and in order to avoid pointless and costly disputes, a safeguard clause needs to be included to protect the investments made by railway undertakings.
Poročevalec zato predlaga, da se v besedilo skupnega stališča ponovno vključi besedilo predloga spremembe, ki določa, da prostovoljni odhod strojevodje iz podjetja prevoznika, ki ga je usposobilo, obvezuje prevoznika v železniškem prometu, ki ga zaposli, da povrne izhodiščnemu prevozniku v železniškem prometu vsoto, sorazmerno s preostalimi stroški usposabljanja, na osnovi usklajenih meril, ki jih bo treba oblikovati po priporočilu agencije.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes the reincorporation in the common position text of the amendment stipulating that the voluntary departure of a driver from the railway undertaking which trained him shall oblige the railway undertaking employing him to refund to the original railway undertaking a sum proportionate to the residual cost of training, based on harmonised criteria which will have to be drawn up following a recommendation from the Agency.
· Vprašanje strokovnih izkušenj
· The question of professional experience
Poročevalec bi želel ohraniti možnost, da vsaka država članica določi minimalne strokovne izkušnje v kategoriji A, potrebne za pridobitev dopolnilnega spričevala za kategorijo B.
Your rapporteur wishes to maintain the possibility for each Member State to stipulate minimum professional experience in category A in order to obtain a category B complementary certificate.
· Vprašanje združljivosti med prilogami in TSI ter revizije prilog
· The question of compatibility between the annexes and the TSIs and revision of the annexes
Poročevalec opozarja, da najmanjše zahteve (opredeljene v prilogah od II do VI) za pridobitev dovoljenja (del 1) ali usklajenega spričevala za strojevodjo (del 2) praviloma sodijo v področje veljavnosti TSI, na osnovi direktiv 96/48/ES in 2001/16/ES, kot sta bili spremenjeni z Direktivo 2004/50/ES.
Your rapporteur would point out that the minimum requirements (defined in Annexes II to VI) for obtaining a licence (part 1) or the harmonised driver’s certificate (part 2) generally fall within the scope of the TSIs, on the basis of Directives 96/48/EC and 2001/16/EC, as revised by Directive 2004/50/EC.
Zato se lahko postavi vprašanje, ali naj se vključijo v to direktivo.
It might therefore be asked whether they should be included in this Directive.
Poročevalec meni, da je treba priloge ohraniti v sedanjem predlogu direktive zaradi dveh temeljnih razlogov:
Your rapporteur takes the view that the annexes should be maintained in the current proposal for a directive for two basic reasons:
– iz namena direktive sledi, da morajo biti minimalne zahteve po kvalifikacijah in torej spričevalih osebja jasno opredeljene;
- the purpose of the Directive implies that the minimum requirements for qualification, and hence certification, of staff must be clearly defined;
– večina teh minimalnih zahtev je bila predmet sporazuma med zadevnimi stranmi v okviru sektorskega socialnega dialoga, kar pomeni, da ne bodo potrebna nadaljnja ponovna pogajanja v okviru TSI.
- most of these minimum requirements have been the subject of an agreement between the parties concerned as part of the sectoral social dialogue, which means subsequent renegotiation in the context of TSIs will be unnecessary.
Da bi se kljub vsemu preprečil položaj, ko bi morebitna prihodnja potreba po prilagoditvi teh zahtev tehničnemu in človeškemu napredku sprožila nujno zapleteno in dolgotrajno revizijo direktive, poročevalec predlaga, da se revizija prilog opravi v skladu s postopkom, določenim za sprejetje TSI, pri čemer se v celoti upoštevajo postopki iz Direktive 2004/50/ES in Uredbe 881/2004/ES o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za železniški promet.
Nevertheless, in order to avoid a situation where the possible future need to adapt these requirements to technical and human progress entails a necessarily complex and lengthy revision of the Directive, your rapporteur proposes that the annexes be revised using the procedure laid down for the adoption of TSIs, whilst fully respecting the procedures laid down by Directive 2004/50/EC and Regulation 881/2004/EC establishing the European Railway Agency.
S tem namenom poročevalec ponovno vlaga predloga spremembe, ki ju je Parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi.
To this end your rapporteur is resubmitting two amendments adopted by Parliament at first reading.
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izdaji spričeval strojevodjem, ki upravljajo lokomotive in vlake na železniškem omrežju Skupnosti
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the certification of train drivers operating locomotives and trains on the railway system in the Community
Datum prve obravnave EP – P številka
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P number
skupnega stališča Sveta o sprejetju uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi prava v nepogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih („Rim II“)
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations ("ROME II")
o skupnem stališču Sveta o sprejetju uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi prava v nepogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih („Rim II“)
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations ("ROME II")
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (9751/7/2006 – C6‑0317/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (9751/7/2006 – C6‑0317/2006 ),
UL C 157, 6.7.2006, str.
OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p.
370. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0427 )
370. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0427 )
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2006)0083 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0083 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0481/2006 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0481/2006 ),
(7) Materialno področje uporabe in določbe te uredbe bi morale biti skladni z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah ("Bruselj I") in Rimsko konvencijo o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbene obveznosti.
(7) The material scope and the provisions of this Regulation should be consistent with Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters ("Brussels I") and the Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations.
(7) Vsebinsko področje uporabe in določbe te uredbe bi morali biti skladni z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah ("Bruselj I") in Rimsko konvencijo o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbene obveznosti ter s prihodnjo uredbo o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbene obveznosti ("Rim I") .
(7) The substantive scope and the provisions of this Regulation should be consistent with Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters ("Brussels I") , the Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations and the future Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations ("Rome I") .
Popolnoma očitno je, da mora biti uredba skladna ne le z Rimsko konvencijo iz leta 1980 - ki bo še naprej obstajala, saj Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju Uredbe, Združeno kraljestvo pa vsaj za zdaj zavrača Rim I, ampak tudi z novo uredbo, ki je v fazi sprejemanja.
It is self-evident that the Regulation should be consistent, not only with the 1980 Rome Convention - which will continue in being owing to the fact that Denmark is not participating in the adoption of the Regulation and the United Kingdom has opted out, at least for the time being, from Rome I - but also with the new regulation in the course of adoption.
Ta predlog spremembe ustreza predlogu spremembe, sprejetem v prvi obravnavi.
This amendment corresponds to an amendment adopted in first reading.
(7a) Skrb za skladnost v pravu Skupnosti zahteva, da ta uredba ne posega v določbe, ki se nanašajo ali vplivajo na veljavno pravo, vsebovano v instrumentih sekundarne zakonodaje poleg te uredbe, kot so kolizijska pravila v konkretnih zadevah, obvezna pravila, ki izvirajo iz Skupnosti, in temeljna pravna načela notranjega trga.
(7a) The concern for consistency in Community law requires that this Regulation be without prejudice to provisions relating to or having an effect on the applicable law, contained in instruments of secondary legislation other than this Regulation, such as conflict rules in specific matters, overriding mandatory rules of Community origin, and the basic legal principles of the internal market.
Posledično bi morala ta uredba spodbujati pravilno delovanje notranjega trga, zlasti prostega pretoka blaga in storitev.
As a result, this Regulation should promote the proper functioning of the internal market, in particular the free movement of goods and services.
Ta predlog spremembe, ki je bil sprejet v prvi obravnavi, in temelji na besedilu uvodne izjave 19 v izvornem predlogu Komisije, je treba brati skupaj s predlogom spremembe k členu 27.
This amendment, adopted in first reading, which is based on the wording of Recital 19 in the Commission's original proposal, should be read together with the amendment to Article 27.
Bistvenega pomena je, da določbe te Uredbe ovirajo pravilnega delovanja notranjega trga.
It is essential that the rules of this Regulation should not hamper the proper functioning of the internal market.
(10a ) Pravila o koliziji zakonov, določena v tej uredbi, zajemajo tudi obveznosti, ki temeljijo na objektivni odgovornosti, usklajena pravila o dejavnikih povezave pa veljajo tudi za vprašanje sposobnosti prevzemanja odgovornosti za škodno dejanje.
(10a) The conflict-of-laws rules set out in this Regulation also cover obligations based on strict liability and the harmonised rules on connecting factors also apply to the question of the capacity to incur liability in tort/delict.
Zlasti (a ne izključno) glede obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz prometnih nezgod, ki temeljijo na objektivni odgovornosti lastnika vozila, je pomembno jasno prikazati, da pravila o koliziji zajemajo tudi objektivno odgovornost.
In view in particular (but not only) of the obligations arising from traffic accidents based on the strict liability of the vehicle owner, it is important to make it plain that the conflict rules also cover strict liability.
Treba je tudi pojasniti, da usklajena pravila o dejavnikih povezave veljajo tudi za vprašanje sposobnosti prevzemanja odgovornosti za škodno dejanje.
It is also worth making it clear that the harmonised rules on connecting factors apply to the question of the capacity to incur liability in tort/delict.
Predlog spremembe je bil sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
This amendment was adopted in first reading.
(12a) Potreba po tem, da se prepreči izkrivljanje konkurence, in zahteva po pravni varnosti morata biti podrejeni potrebi po pravičnem ravnanju v posameznih primerih, zato morajo sodišča imeti določeno mero diskrecijske pravice.
(12a) Nevertheless, the need to avoid distortions of competition and the requirement of legal certainty must be tempered by the need to do justice in individual cases, and consequently the courts must have a margin of discretion.
V pravila je treba vgraditi nekaj prožnosti, da bodo lahko sodišča ravnala pravično v posameznih primerih.
Some flexibility needs to be built into the rules so as to allow the courts to do justice in individual cases.
Sodišča zadeve že sedaj razvrščajo kot "postopkovne", da si omogočijo določeno mero diskrecijske pravice.
Courts already use the categorisation of issues as "procedural" in order to allow them a measure of discretion.
Potreba po pravni varnosti bi bila bolj upoštevana, če bi sodiščem podelili omejeno diskrecijsko pravico.
It is better and more consistent with the need for legal certainty overtly to confer certain limited discretionary powers on the courts.
Ta predlog spremembe ustreza predlogu spremembe, sprejetemu v prvi obravnavi.
This amendment is based on an amendment adopted in first reading.
(19) Posebno pravilo iz člena 6 ni izjema od splošnega pravila iz člena 4(1), ampak zgolj njegovo pojasnilo.
(19) The special rule in Article 6 is not an exception to the general rule in Article 4(1) but rather a clarification of it.
Glede nelojalne konkurence bi moral predpis glede kolizije zakonov varovati konkurente, potrošnike in splošno javnost ter zagotavljati pravilno delovanje tržnega gospodarstva.
In matters of unfair competition, the conflict rule should protect competitors, consumers and the general public and ensure that the market economy functions properly.
Povezava s pravom države, v kateri so razmerja med konkurenti ali skupni interesi potrošnikov prizadeti ali bi lahko bili prizadeti, je na splošno v skladu s temi cilji.
The connection to the law of the country where competitive relations or the collective interests of consumers are, or are likely to be, affected generally satisfies these objectives.
Splošno pravilo je v primerih nelojalne konkurence lahko popolnoma ustrezno.
It is considered that the general rule can cater perfectly well for cases involving unfair competition.
V uvodnih izjavah 20 in 21 Svet pojasnjuje, da "nelojalna konkurenca in dejanja omejevanja svobodne konkurence"pomenijo kršitve konkurenčnega prava nacionalnih držav in konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti, zlasti kršitve členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe.
Moreover, in Recitals 20 and 21, the Council makes it clear that what it means by "Unfair competition and acts restricting competition" is infringements of national and Community competition law, in particular breaches of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty.
Komisija pa se je v svojem spremenjenem predlogu (KOM(2006)83 končno) odločila za drugačen pristop in določila pravilo za "nepogodbene obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz nelojalne poslovne prakse".
However, in its revised proposal (COM(2006)83 final), the Commission took quite a different approach by laying down a rule for "non-contractual obligations arising out of an unfair commercial practice".
Zaradi trenutno potekajoče razprave o zeleni knjigi o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES je Komisija protikonkurenčne prakse iz členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe raje prepustila splošnemu pravilu, kar morda pomeni, da "želi Komisija med postopkom soodločanja podpreti drugačno rešitev".
It preferred to leave anti-competitive practices within the meaning of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty subject to the general rule on the ground of the ongoing debate on the Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, as a result of which "the Commission may wish to support a different solution in the course of the codecision procedure".
Pristop Sveta v skupnem stališču bi zmanjšal pravico Komisije do pobude in preprečil odločanje Parlamenta glede vseh bodočih zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije, ki se nanašajo posebej na konkurenčno pravo.
The Council's approach in the common position would detract from the Commission's right of initiative and pre-empt Parliament's deliberations on any future Commission legislative proposal relating specifically to competition law.
Ugotavlja se, da je bil ustrezni predlog spremembe sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
It is noted that a corresponding amendment was adopted in first reading.
(20) Nepogodbene obveznosti, nastale zaradi omejevanja konkurence iz člena 6(3), bi morale zajemati kršitve tako nacionalnega konkurenčnega prava kot konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti.
(20) The non-contractual obligations arising out of restrictions of competition in Article 6(3) should cover infringements of both national and Community competition law.
Pravo, ki se uporablja za takšne nepogodbene obveznosti, bi moralo biti pravo države, na katere trgu ima omejitev učinek ali bi ga lahko imela, pod pogojem, da je učinek neposreden in bistven.
The law applicable to such non-contractual obligations should be the law of the country on whose market the restriction has, or is likely to have, effect, provided that the effect is direct and substantial.
Kjer škoda nastane v več kot eni državi, naj se uporaba katerega koli prava teh držav omeji na škodo povzročeno v tej državi.
Where the damage is sustained in more than one country, the application of the law of any of those countries should be limited to the damage which occurred in that country.
Glej obrazložitev predloga spremembe k uvodni izjavi 19.
See the justification to the amendment to Recital 19.
Med primere zadev, ki so zajete v členu 6(3), sodijo prepoved sporazumov med podjetji, sklepi podjetniških združenj in usklajena ravnanja, ki bi lahko vplivali na trgovino med državami članicami in katerih cilj ali posledica je preprečevanje, omejevanje ali izkrivljanje konkurence v državi članici ali na notranjem trgu, kakor tudi prepoved zlorabe prevladujočega položaja v državi članici ali na notranjem trgu.
(21) Examples of cases covered by Article 6(3) include prohibitions on agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within a Member State or within the internal market, as well as prohibitions on the abuse of a dominant position within a Member State or within the internal market.
Glede okoljske škode, člen 174 Pogodbe, ki določa, da bi bilo treba doseči visoko raven varstva, ki temelji na previdnostnem načelu in načelih, da bi bilo treba delovati preventivno, da je treba okoljsko škodo prednostno odpravljati pri viru in da mora plačati povzročitelj obremenitve, popolnoma opravičuje uporabo načela diskriminacije v korist osebe, ki je utrpela škodo.
(22) Regarding environmental damage, Article 174 of the Treaty, which provides that there should be a high level of protection based on the precautionary principle and the principle that preventive action should be taken, the principle of priority for corrective action at source and the principle that the polluter pays, fully justifies the use of the principle of discriminating in favour of the person sustaining the damage.
Vprašanje, kdaj lahko oseba, ki zahteva odškodnino, izbira pravo, ki naj se uporabi, bi bilo treba določiti v skladu s pravom države članice, v kateri je sodišče, kjer poteka postopek.
The question of when the person seeking compensation can make the choice of the law applicable should be determined in accordance with the law of the Member State in which the court is seised.
Splošno pravilo je lahko popolnoma ustrezno za okoljsko škodo.
It is considered that the general rule can cater perfectly well for environmental damage.
Ker pa ni jasno, kaj se misli z "okoljsko škodo", bi se morala uredba ukvarjati le s tem, katero pravo naj se uporabi, ne pa z materialnim pravom o okoljski odgovornosti.
Moreover, it is uncertain what is meant by "environmental damage" and this Regulation should be concerned solely with what the applicable law should be, not with the substantive law on environmental liability.
Če bi se izkazalo, da je nujno treba imeti posebno pravilo za "okoljsko škodo", je treba vključiti klavzulo o opredelitvi te škode.
In the event that it should be regarded as imperative to have a special rule for "violations of the environment", a definition clause should be included.
(25a) Kar zadeva kršitve zasebnosti in osebnostnih pravic, ta uredba državam članicam ne preprečuje, da bi izvajale ustavne predpise v zvezi s svobodo tiska in svobodo izražanja v medijih.
(25a) As regards violations of privacy or rights relating to the personality, t his Regulation does not prevent Member States from applying their constitutional rules relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression in the media.
Država, kateri je publikacija ali televizijski/radijski program namenjen, se določi zlasti na osnovi jezika publikacije ali televizijskega/radijskega programa ali na osnovi obsega prodaje oziroma števila bralcev/gledalcev/poslušalcev v tej državi ali na osnovi deleža celotne prodaje oziroma števila bralcev/ gledalcev/ poslušalcev ali na osnovi kombinacije teh faktorjev.
The country to which a publication or broadcast is directed should be determined in particular by the language of the publication or broadcast or by sales or audience size in a given country as a proportion of total sales or audience size or by a combination of those factors.
Podobne zahteve naj veljajo v zvezi z objavo preko svetovnega spleta ali drugih elektronskih omrežij.
Similar considerations should apply in respect of publication via the Internet or other electronic networks .
Čeprav sta se Komisija v spremenjenem predlogu in Svet v skupnem stališču odpovedala poskusu, da bi vključila pravila o pravu, ki se uporablja za kršitev zasebnosti ali osebnostnih pravic, poročevalka meni, da se temu vprašanju ne bi smeli izogibati.
Whereas in the Commission, in its amended proposal, and the Council, in the common position, have abandoned the attempt to include rules on the law applicable to violations of privacy and rights relating to the personality, the rapporteur considers that this issue should not be shirked.
Meni, da je stališče Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi pameten pristop, in da je skladen s sodbo v primeru C-68/93 Fiona Shevill in drugi [1995] ECR I-415.
She considers that Parliament's stance in first reading constitutes a sensible approach consistent with the judgment in Case C-68/93 Fiona Shevill and Others [1995] ECR I-415.