natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prostovoljni sporazumi z označbami porekla omogočajo proizvajalcem registracijo v sistemu Skupnosti za pridobitev pravnega varstva nekaterih posebnih kmetijskih proizvodov in živil.
The voluntary arrangements give producers the possibility of registering under a Community system providing legally binding protection for special agricultural products and foodstuffs with a name indicating the origin of the product.
Zaščitena označba porekla (ZOP) označuje proizvod, katerega proizvodnja, predelava ali priprava potekajo na določenem geografskem območju s priznanim in določenim postopkom.
In order to be eligible to carry the protected designation of origin (PDO), products must be produced, processed and prepared in a given geographical area using a recognised, specified method.
Zajamčeno tradicionalno posebnost (ZTP) ureja Uredba št. 2082/92 in se ne nanaša na geografsko poreklo, ampak poudarja tradicionalno sestavo proizvoda ali tradicionalen način proizvodnje in/ali predelave.
The traditional speciality guaranteed (TSG) , which is covered by Regulation 2082/92, does not refer to the geographical origin but highlights the traditional composition of the product or a traditional method of preparation and/or processing.
Zaščita geografskih označb je že dolga leta predmet spora z mednarodnimi trgovinskimi partnerji Evropske unije v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO).
The issue of protection of geographical indications has for many years been a bone of contention with the EU’s international trading partners in the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
Po sklenitvi sporazuma TRIPS o trgovinskih vidikih zaščite intelektualne lastnine je bila zakonodaja Evropske unije revidirana, tako da omogoča tretjim državam enak dostop do evropskega sistema (z določenimi obveznostmi)
Following the conclusion of the TRIPS Agreement, EU legislation was revised in order to allow third countries equal access to the European system (under certain conditions)
Uredba (ES) Sveta št. 692/2003 z dne 8. aprila 2003, poročilo EP (JM Fruteau) A5-375/2002 . .
Council Regulation (EC) No 692/2003, 8.4.2003; EP report A5-375/2002 (JM Fruteau) .
Vendar so Združene države in Avstralija poslale pritožbo organu STO za poravnavo sporov, na podlagi katere so skušale proglasiti Evropsko uredbo št. 2081/92 za nezdružljivo z mednarodnimi trgovinskimi sporazumi, kot je sporazum TRIPS
However, complaints were lodged with the WTO Dispute Settlement Body by the United States and Australia, who sought to have European Regulation No 2081/92 declared incompatible with international trade agreements such as the TRIPS Agreement
Kritične točke so bile predvsem, da druge članice STO niso bile deležne enake obravnave (prednost so imele države članice EU), domnevno manjša zaščita oznak (trademarks); trgovinski partnerji niso imeli enake pravice do pritožbe zaradi kršenja ali povzročanja izkrivljanja konkurence geografskih označb, kot tudi domnevne nepreglednosti sistema Evropske unije.
The main criticisms made were that other WTO members were not given equal treatment, i.e. that there was preferential treatment of EU Member States; that there was less protection of trademarks; that trading partners did not enjoy the same right to object against geographical indications being abused or used in a way which distorted competition; and that there was a lack of transparency in the EU system.
Kot sprejemljivih je bilo registriranih več kršitev sporazuma TRIPS, členov 1 in 3 sporazuma GATT, člena 2 Sporazuma o tehničnih ovirah v trgovini in člena 56(4) Sporazuma STO. .
A number of infringements of the TRIPS Agreement, Articles 1 and 3 of the GATT, Article 2 of the TBT and Article 56(4) of the WTO Agreement were claimed. .
Organ STO za poravnavo sporov je aprila 2005 sprejel dve poročili skupine na visoki ravni, ki je prišla do zaključka, da uredba EU pri večini kritičnih točk ni v nasprotju z obveznostmi STO.
In April 2005 the WTO Dispute Settlement Body adopted two panel reports, which concluded that, on the majority of the points criticised, the EU regulation was not inconsistent with WTO obligations.
Vseeno pa se od Evropske unije zahteva, da izboljša dostop državljanov tretjih držav do evropskega sistema in da se te državljane pri postopku prijave in pravici do pritožbe obravnava enako kot državljane Evropske unije.
However, the EU was required to improve access by third country nationals to the EU system and to place those nationals on an equal footing with EU citizens, particularly with regard to the application procedure and the right to object.
Te prilagoditve uredbi EU se morajo opraviti 20. aprila 2006 in predstavljajo pomemben delež obstoječega zakonodajnega predloga.
The relevant adjustments to the EU regulation have to be made by 20 April 2006, and they form an important part of this legislative proposal.
Vsebina predloga Komisije: spremembe v zvezi z Uredbo št. 2081/92
Substance of the Commission proposal: changes in relation to Regulation 2081/92
Določbe, ki jih uvaja Uredba (ES) št. 692/2003 o pravilih dostopa tretjih držav in načelih enakih meril, recipročnosti in primerljivosti nadzora, se v obstoječem predlogu črtajo in nadomestijo s poenostavljenim postopkom.
The provisions introduced by Regulation (EC) No 692/2003 relating to the rules governing third country access, and the principles of equivalent standards, reciprocity and comparable checks enshrined in it, are removed from the current proposal and replaced by a simplified procedure.
Tretja država lahko pri Komisiji vloži zahtevek za registracijo pod pogojem, da sta označba porekla ali geografska označba tudi v tej državi zaščiteni.
A third country may submit a request for registration to the Commission, provided that the geographical indication or designation of origin is also protected in the third country in question.
Opredelitev določb o nadzoru je prav tako bolj prilagodljiva.
The rules on checks are also more flexible.
Poleg tega Komisija želi razjasniti delitev pristojnosti med njo in državami članicami v zvezi s postopkom odobritve; pregled včasih obširne dokumentacije zahtevkov mora biti v pristojnosti držav članic, na evropski ravni pa se opravi le končni nadzor ter posvetovanje z drugimi državami članicami.
In addition, the Commission seeks to clarify the division of responsibilities between the Commission and the Member States in connection with the approval procedure, with Member States responsible for examining the sometimes voluminous application documentation and only a final check and consultation with other Member States being carried out at the European level.
Državam članicam bo tudi dovoljeno pobirati davek.
Member States will also be allowed to levy a charge.
Doslej prostovoljna uporaba logotipa Skupnosti za ZOP ali ZGO bi morala biti obvezna, kot je uporaba ustrezne označbe (zaščitena geografska označba in zaščitena označba porekla) ali okrajšave (ZOP in ZGO).
Use of the Community logo for PGIs and PDOs, which to date has been voluntary, is to be made compulsory, as is the use of the appropriate indication (‘protected geographical indication’ or ‘protected designation of origin’) or abbreviation (‘PGI’ or ‘PDO’).
Rok šestih mesecev, v katerem naj bi druge države članice vložile svoje pritožbe, naj bi se skrajšal na štiri mesece (člen 7).
The time limit within which other Member States may lodge objections is to be reduced from six to four months (Article 7).
Poleg tega se morajo spremeniti določbe o komitologiji in v prihodnje se morajo uporabljati postopki upravnega odbora in odbora za zakonsko ureditev (člen 15).
In addition, the commitology provisions are being amended, and in future both the management committee and regulatory committee procedures will apply (Article 15).
Vloga poročevalca/upravičenost predlogov sprememb
Rapporteur’s position/reasons for amendments
Zaščitene geografske označbe in zaščitene označbe porekla prispevajo velik delež k ustvarjanju dodane vrednosti v podeželskih regijah Evrope.
Protected geographical indications and geographical designations of origin contribute in a very important way to adding value to production in rural areas of Europe.
Sloves, ki ga ti proizvodi imajo pri evropskih potrošnikih, njihovim proizvajalcem omogoča doseganje višje cene na trgih.
The reputation which these products enjoy among European consumers allows their producers access to higher‑priced markets.
Samo v Franciji in Italiji se tržna vrednost tako zaščitenih proizvodov ocenjuje na več kot 10 milijard evrov.
In France and Italy alone, the market value of products protected in this way is estimated at over €10 billion.
V sedmih državah članicah
In seven Member States
Nemčija, Francija, Italija, Nizozemska, Španija, Velika Britanija.
Germany, France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom.
Poleg tega imajo geografske označbe zelo velik pomen za temeljno razpravo o kvalitativnem pristopu k trgovini z živili in kmetijskimi proizvodi v okviru STO.
Furthermore, geographical indications are a key issue in the fundamental debate being held about applying conditions on standards to trade in agricultural products and foodstuffs within the context of the WTO.
Značilno je, da so ZDA in Avstralija odločno nastopile proti zaščitenim geografskim označbam, čeprav do danes niso vložile nobenega zahtevka za sodelovanje v evropskem sistemu zaščitenih geografskih označb.
It is significant that the United States and Australia have made such a strong attack on PGIs, despite the fact that no requests to participate in the European system of protected geographical indications have to date been received from those countries.
Gre za načelno vprašanje: blagovne znamke morajo biti zavarovane v okviru sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih zaščite intelektualne lastnine (TRIPS) in te države želijo, da se geografske označbe uporabljajo le izjemoma in da se omejijo na nekatera vina in žgane pijače.
It is, rather, for them a question of principle: trademarks should be protected under the TRIPS Agreement, and the countries concerned wish to see geographical indications apply only exceptionally to certain wines and spirits.
Evropska unija mora z vsemi silami in diplomatskimi spretnostmi zagovarjati geografske označbe pri naslednjih pogajanjih o izvajanju sklepov iz Hongkonga.
The EU must use all its clout and diplomatic skill to defend geographical indications, initially in the forthcoming negotiations on the implementation of the Hong Kong decisions.
Geografske označbe so izvrstno sredstvo za dosego kvalitativnega pristopa k mednarodni trgovini.
Geographical indications are an excellent way of achieving the application of conditions on standards to international trade.
Zato je neprecenljivega pomena, da je organ za poravnavo sporov zavrnil načelno nasprotovanje ZDA in Avstralije.
The decision by the Dispute Settlement Body to reject the basis of the attacks by the United States and Australia is therefore of inestimable importance.
Kljub temu, da je sklep organa STO za poravnavo sporov izredno pozitiven za EU, bo pri naslednjih pogajanjih v okviru agende iz Dohe razprava o zaščiti blagovnih znamk v zvezi s kvalitativnimi geografskim označbami zelo burna.
However, even following this decision by the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body, which is a clearly favourable one for the EU, the argument about the protection of registered trademarks vis-à-vis geographical quality indications will continue to be hotly debated in the negotiations within the framework of the Doha Agenda.
Večstranski register za geografske označbe porekla vin in alkoholnih pijač, kot ga predvideva sporazum TRIPS, še vedno ni opredeljen, čeprav pogajanja o tem potekajo že od leta 1997.
To date, a decision has not even been taken on the multilateral register of geographical designations of origin for wines and alcoholic beverages provided for in the TRIPS Agreement, although negotiations have been going on since 1997.
Razširitev registra na živila in kmetijske proizvode
The extension of the register to include foodstuffs and other agricultural products
Medtem pa se je večkrat zgodilo, da posamezni proizvajalci v živilski industriji niso upoštevali evropskega sistema geografskih označb.
On the contrary, the European system of protected geographical indications is repeatedly being disregarded by individual operators in the food industry:
• Kraft Foods v ZDA proizvaja "parmezan", ki zori samo šest mesecev (v Evropski uniji dvanajst mesecev);
· Kraft Foods produces ‘Parmesan’ in the USA, which matures for only six months (as against at least 12 months in the EU);
• Po mnenju ZDA so konjak, sherry, porto in šampanjec generične označbe in ne zaščitene geografske označbe s posebnimi merili kakovosti;
· cognac, sherry, port and champagne have, in the United States’ view, become generic names and should not therefore be protected names with special quality standards.
Tudi znotraj Evropske unije so merila kakovosti za zaščitene geografske označbe še vedno predmet razprav.
However, even within the EU the quality requirements for protected geographical indications are again and again a subject of discussion.
Tako so se na primer spremenila merila za proizvodnjo parmskega pršuta, ki se mu ne sme več dodati svinine, uvožene iz Nizozemske ali Belgije.
For example, the standards for the preparation of Parma ham have been amended so as to make it no longer permissible to process products of imported Netherlands or Belgian pigs.
Kljub temu pa mediji vedno znova poročajo, da proizvedena količina parmskega pršuta presega regionalno in celo italijansko populacijo prašičev.
Nevertheless, the media repeatedly report that production of Parma ham exceeds the capacity of the regional, and even of the Italian, pig population.
V nekaterih državah članicah ne preverjajo ali nezadostno preverjajo spoštovanje posebnih meril, ki so jih proizvajalci določili pri registraciji ("specifikacije").
In some Member States, checks on compliance with the specific standards laid down by producers when registering products (the ‘specification’) are not being carried out or are inadequate.
Po mnenju poročevalca je obvezno spoštovati in preverjati merila kakovosti zaščitenih proizvodov v okviru te uredbe.
In your rapporteur’s view, it is imperative that the quality standards for products protected under this regulation are properly complied with and monitored.
Poleg tega mora biti sporno vprašanje nakupa surovin urejeno tako, da ne bo nobenega dvoma o verodostojnosti označb kakovosti.
Above all, on the contentious issue of the purchase of raw materials, the rules must be sufficiently strict as to ensure that no doubt can be cast on the credibility of quality indications.
Če Evropska unija ne bo samodejno uvedla strožjih meril, bo njeno pogajalsko izhodišče v prihodnjih razpravah v okviru STO zelo težavno.
If the European Union does not take the initiative in introducing stricter standards, we shall be in a very difficult negotiating position in the forthcoming debate within the WTO.
Poročevalec tudi nasprotuje predlogu Komisije, da bi se odgovornost preverjanja vloženih zahtevkov prenesla na države članice.
In addition, your rapporteur has reservations about the proposal by the Commission to shift responsibility for examining applications submitted onto the Member States.
Čeprav je bilo tudi v prejšnjih ureditvah predvideno, da pristojni organi držav članic predhodno pregledajo dokumente, je treba jasno opredeliti, da mora biti sklep o registraciji sprejet na ravni Skupnosti.
Although the previous arrangements also provided for prior examination of documents by the competent authorities in the Member States, it should be made clear that the decision on registration must be made at the Community level.
Zato se ne sme govoriti o "nacionalnem" priznanju temveč samo o "začasnem" priznanju.
Reference should therefore be made not to ‘national’, but only to ‘provisional’ recognition.
S 300 še nerešenimi zahtevki so pristojne službe Komisije brez dvoma postavljene pred težko nalogo.
Undeniably, given that there are currently around 300 applications which are still being processed, the Commission services are faced with a very considerable task.
Namesto da bi predlagali prenos te odgovornosti na organe držav članic, kar bi lahko privedlo do ponovne nacionalizacije, bi bilo treba razmisliti, ali ni primernejše, da se pregled in registracija zahtevkov za geografske označbe in označbe porekla zaupata evropski agenciji.
However, in place of the proposal to shift the burden onto the authorities in the Member States, which runs the risk of renationalisation, consideration should be given to whether a European agency should not be given the task of examining and registering requests for geographical indications and designations of origin.
V strokovnih krogih o tem že razpravljajo in poročevalec meni, kljub težavam, ki jih predstavljajo obstoječe evropske agencije, da bi sedanji zakonodajni predlog moral obravnavati to vprašanje in ne bi smel iskati domnevno enostavne rešitve v nacionalizaciji, ki bi dolgoročno lahko močno oslabila evropski sistem geografskih označb.
This debate is already taking place among experts, and your rapporteur is of the view - despite all of the problems associated with existing European agencies - that this legislative proposal should address this issue, instead of looking for a supposedly simple solution in the form of nationalisation, which from a longer-term perspective could leave the European system of geographical indications very open to attack.
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila
Proposal for a Council regulation on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o sklenitvi Partnerskega sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Federativnimi državami Mikronezije o ribolovu v Federativnih državah Mikronezije
on the proposal for a Council regulation concerning the conclusion of the Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Federated States of Micronesia on fishing in the Federated States of Micronesia
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................10
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS.................................................................10
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................16
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT......................................................14
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2005)0502 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation ( COM(2005)0502 )
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0353/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0353/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 51 in 83(7) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo in mnenj Odbora za proračun ter Odbora za razvoj ( A6‑0035/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Development ( A6‑0035/2006 ),
Člen 2(a) (novo)
Recital 2 a (new)
S tem predlogom spremembe želimo izpostaviti pomen posredovanja ustreznih informacij Evropskemu parlamentu, na podlagi katerih bo ocenil sporazum in preveril delovanje novih sporazumov o partnerstvu.
Parliament needs to be supplied with proper information so that it can evaluate the agreement and assess the operation of the new partnership agreements.
Člen 2(a)
Article 2a
V zadnjem letu veljavnosti Protokola in pred sklenitvijo sporazuma o njegovi obnovitvi Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poda poročilo o izvajanju Sporazuma.
During the final year of the Protocol’s validity and before another agreement is concluded on its renewal, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of the agreement.
Pred sklenitvijo novega sporazuma bi morala Komisija od državnih oblasti države, s katero se pogaja, zahtevati informacije, na podlagi katerih bo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu podala poročilo o splošni presoji.
Before any new agreement is concluded, the Commission should ask the authorities of the country with which it is opening negotiations to provide it with information on the basis of which it will submit a general assessment report to Parliament and the Council.
Člen 2(b) (novo)
Article 2 b (new)
Člen 2(b)
Article 2b
Na podlagi poročila, navedenega v členu 2(a), in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom Svet pooblasti Komisijo, če je to potrebno, za pogajanja o sklenitvi novega protokola.
On the basis of the report referred to in Article 2a and after consulting the European Parliament, the Council shall, where appropriate, grant the Commission a negotiating mandate with a view to the adoption of a new protocol.
Evropski parlament in Svet lahko svoje obveznosti izpolnita zgolj s poročilom o presoji izvajanja sporazuma o ribolovu.
Parliament and the Council will be able to discharge their respective duties only on the basis of the evaluation report on the application of the fisheries agreement.
Komisija Evropski parlament in Svet obvesti o izvedbi večletnega sektorskega programa in pravilih izvajanja tega programa iz člena 5(2) Protokola.
The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the multiannual sectoral programme and its implementing rules referred to in Article 5(2) of the Protocol.
Ciljni ukrepi postajajo vedno bolj pomembni tako s finančnega kot socialnega vidika.
Targeted measures are becoming increasingly important in both financial and social terms.
Zato bi moral biti sektorski program posredovan Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Consequently, the sectoral programme should be forwarded to Parliament and the Council.
Evropska unija je sklenila vsega skupaj tri sporazume o ribolovu z otoškimi državami v zahodnem Pacifiku: s Kiribatijem (v veljavi), s Federativnimi državami Mikronezije (predmet tega mnenja) in s Salomonovimi otoki (tudi v postopku odobritve EU).
The EU has negotiated a total of three fisheries agreements with the island states in the Western Pacific - Kiribati (currently in force), the Federated States of Micronesia (the subject of the present opinion) and the Solomon Islands (currently also being approved by the EU machinery).
Zadnja dva sta nova "partnerska" sporazuma, tisti s Kiribatijem pa je klasični sporazum o ribolovu.
The latter two are the new "partnership" agreements, whereas that with Kiribati is a classical fisheries agreement.
Sporazum z Mikronezijo je nov in sklenjen za dobo devetih let (v primerjavi s tremi leti za Salomonove otoke).
The agreement with Micronesia is a new one, to last for a period of nine years (compared to three years for the Solomons).
Protokol je nasprotno zelo podoben protokolu, sklenjenim s Salomonovimi otoki.
The protocol, though, is very similar to that of the Solomons.
V skladu z njim je za obdobje treh let, ki se začne z zaključitvijo postopka odobritve, šestim plovilom z zapornimi plavaricami in dvanajstim plovilom s parangalom dovoljen ribolov v vodah Mikronezije.
It allows for six purse seine vessels and twelve longliners to operate in the waters of the Micronesia for a period of three years, beginning when the approval procedures are completed.
Finančni prispevek znaša 559.000 EUR letno, vendar se ob povečanju števila plovil z zapornimi plavaricami zviša za 65.000 EUR na plovilo.
The financial compensation is fixed at EUR 559.000 per year, but if the number of purse seiners increases then the compensation increases by EUR 65.000 per vessel.
Za ta znesek lahko plovila EU nalovijo skupaj 8.600 ton letno; če je ulov večji, se prispevek poveča za 65 EUR na tono.
For that amount, the EU vessels can catch a total of 8.600 tonnes per year; if catches exceed that then the payment is increased by EUR 65 per tonne.
Okvirni skupni stroški financiranja ukrepa ( KOM(2005)0502 , Zakonsko predpisani finančni izkaz, str.
Total indicative financial cost on intervention ( COM(2005)0502 , Legislative Financial Statement, p.