natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kljub temu mnoge politike v zvezi s podeželskimi območji ne upoštevajo dovolj njihovih posebnosti in dejanskih potreb.
Despite this, many policies regarding rural areas fail to reflect sufficiently their specific nature and their actual needs.
Nagla rast mest ima poleg posledic na gospodarstvo še okoljske, družbene in kulturne posledice ter vpliv na kulturno dediščino podeželskih območij, ki ostajajo pomemben del našega kolektivnega evropskega spomina in vir ustvarjalnosti.
Rapid urban growth has not only economic but also environmental, social and cultural implications, affecting the cultural heritage of rural areas, which remain an important part of our collective European memory and a source of creativity.
Sedanji trend je usmerjen na najbolj obetavne dokaze naše kulturne dediščine, to je najsijajnejše spomenike, najbolj ohranjena stara mesta in večja zgodovinska in arheološka območja.
The current trend is to target the most promising manifestations of our cultural heritage, that is to say the finest monuments, the best conserved old cities and major historical and archaeological sites.
Nujno jih je ohraniti, enako pozornost pa bi morali posvetiti spodbujanju ohranjanja podeželskih in otoških območij Evrope, zlasti manjših tradicionalnih skupnosti.
While their continued conservation is essential, similar attention must also be given to promoting Europe's rural and island areas, in particular small traditional communities.
Vendar to dragoceno kulturno dediščino nenehno ogrožajo družbeni in tehnološki napredek, sodobni načini kmetovanja, neobrzdano gospodarsko izkoriščanje, gradnja nepremičnin in človeška brezbrižnost.
However, this valuable cultural heritage is constantly being undermined by social and technological progress, modern farming methods, unbridled economic exploitation and property development and human indifference.
Zato je bistveno, da se zavedamo, kako pomembna sta naraven način življenja in potreba po dolgoročnem upravljanju kulturne dediščine na podeželskih območjih, da bi izboljšali kakovost življenja vseh evropskih državljanov.
It is therefore essential to be aware of the importance of a natural way of life and the need for long-term management of the cultural heritage in rural areas to improve the quality of life of all European citizens.
Uspešna politika na tem področju mora temeljiti na naslednjih načelih:
Effective policy in this area must be based on the following principles:
a. trajnostno ravnotežje med prebivalstvom in okoljem,
a. sustainable balance between the population and the environment,
b. celosten pristop do tradicionalno kmetijskih območij, ki mora presegati sektorsko omejevanje in vključiti posvetovanje med centralnimi organi in lokalnim prebivalstvom,
b. an integrated approach to traditionally agricultural areas, transcending circumscribed sectoral concerns and involving consultation between the central authorities and local populace,
c. sodelovanje lokalnega prebivalstva pri načrtovanju in izvajanju politik in usklajevanje med njihovimi stališči in odločitvami centralnih organov;
c. participation of the local populace in drafting and implementing policies and alignment between their views and decisions taken by the central authorities.
Zaščita in spodbujanje kulturne dediščine na podeželskih in otoških območjih
Protection and promotion of the cultural heritage in rural and island areas
Namen posebnih predlogov iz tega poročila je zagotoviti, da Evropska unija, države članice, lokalni organi in nevladne kulturne organizacije ukrepajo tako, da se naravna in arhitekturna kulturna dediščina Evrope varuje in razvija, zlasti na podeželskih in otoških območjih in v majhnih tradicionalnih skupnostih.
The specific proposals contained in this report seek to ensure that the European Union, the Member States, the local authorities and non-governmental cultural organisations take specific measures to safeguard and develop Europe's natural and architectural cultural heritage, particularly in rural and island areas and small traditional communities.
Predlogi vključujejo:
Its proposals include the following:
- sistematičen pregled kulturne dediščine podeželskih in otoških območij,
- a systematic survey of the cultural heritage in rural and island areas
- oblikovanje zakonodajnega okvira za njeno ohranjanje,
- the drafting of a legislative framework to conserve it,
- financiranje obnove lokalnih spomenikov in nadaljevanja tradicionalnih načinov kmetovanja,
- funding for the restoration of local monuments and continuation of traditional farming methods,
- obsežne ukrepe za obnovo prvotnih arhitekturnih razporeditev tradicionalnih skupnosti z odpravo kakršnih koli prejšnjih posegov, ki so v nasprotju s tem namenom,
- comprehensive measures for the restoration of traditional communities original architectural configurations, remedying any previous interventions running counter to this purpose,
- poklicno usposabljanje strokovnjakov, ki so vključeni v uporabo prostora in upravljanja z njim, arhitekturo, obnovo zgradb in sorodne dejavnosti, da se ti seznanijo z možnimi načini ohranjanja dediščine. ki hkrati upoštevajo tudi današnje potrebe,
- training for professionals involved in the use and management of space, architecture, the restoration of buildings and related activities in how to conserve the specific nature of the heritage while meeting present-day needs,
- usposabljanje in podpora za obrtnike in dobavitelje tradicionalnih materialov ter uporaba metod za lažjo ponovno uporabo slednjih.
- training and support for craftsmen and suppliers of traditional materials and the use of methods facilitating their reutilisation.
Ukrepi na ravni Evropske unije
Actions at European Union level
Glede na neustrezna sredstva, ki so dodeljena kulturnim programom Skupnosti, je treba za varovanje kulturne dediščine iskati dodatne vire sredstev iz drugih instrumentov Skupnosti.
Given the inadequate funding earmarked for Community cultural programmes, additional appropriations must be sought from other Community instruments to safeguard the cultural heritage.
Treba bi bilo torej posvetiti večjo pozornost kulturni dediščini, ki bi morala biti v celoti vključena v politike in finančne instrumente Evropske unije, vključno s skupno kmetijsko politiko, kohezijsko in kulturno politiko ter politiko raziskav itd.
Greater attention should therefore be given to the cultural heritage, which should be fully integrated into European Union policies and financial instruments, including the common agricultural policy and cohesion, research and cultural policies etc.
a) Skupna kmetijska politika
(a) The common agricultural policy
Razvoj podeželja je postal drugi steber skupne kmetijske politike Skupnosti.
Rural development has become the second pillar of common agricultural policy in the Community.
Ukrepi za izboljšanje okolja, krajine in kakovosti življenja na podeželskih območjih so ena od prednostnih nalog, ki so navedene v sklepu Sveta o strategijah razvoja podeželja Skupnosti (2007-2013).
Measures to improve the environment, landscape and quality of life in rural areas is one of the priorities contained in the Council decision concerning Community rural development strategies (2007-2013).
Pobuda Skupnosti LEADER+, ki bo v naslednjem finančnem obdobju (2007-2013) tvorila del Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja, je v veliki meri prispevala k razvoju kulturne in arhitekturne dediščine na podeželskih območjih.
The Community LEADER+ initiative which will, in the forthcoming financing period (2007-2013), form part of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development has greatly contributed to developing the cultural and architectural heritage of rural areas.
Podobno bi lahko razvoj podeželskega turizma, ki je tudi eden od ciljev Evropskega sklada za razvoj podeželja, pomagal ohraniti in spodbujati dediščino podeželskih in otoških območij.
Similarly the development of rural tourism, which is one of the objectives of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, may also help to conserve and promote the heritage of rural and island areas.
Poročevalec meni, da bi države članice morale v prihodnosti bolje uporabiti sredstva skupne kmetijske politike.
The rapporteur considers that Member States should in future make better use of common agricultural policy appropriations.
b) Kohezijska politika
(b) Cohesion policy
Tudi strukturni skladi, ki bodo skupaj z obstoječima pobudama Skupnosti URBAN II in INTERREG III v naslednjem finančnem obdobju (2007-2013) sestavljali del novega finančnega instrumenta kohezijske politike, prav tako v veliki meri prispevajo k ohranjanju in razvijanju kulturne dediščine.
The structural funds, together with the existing URBAN II and INTERREG III Community initiatives, which will in the next financing period (2007-2013) form part of the new cohesion policy financial instruments, are also making a major contribution to conserving and developing the cultural heritage.
Vendar so med državami članicami velike razlike pri uporabi strukturnih skladov za projekte kulturne dediščine.
However, the use of the structural funds for cultural heritage projects varies greatly from one Member State to another.
Nekatere države, kot sta na primer Grčija in Portugalska, so v okviru podpore Skupnosti pričele izvajati operativne programe posebej za kulturo, medtem ko druge države za to niso pokazale takega zanimanja.
Countries such as Greece and Portugal have, under the Community Support Framework launched specifically cultural operational programmes, while other countries have failed to manifest their similar interest.
Države članice bi bilo treba spodbujati k uporabi strukturnih skladov za namen ohranjanja kulturne dediščine.
Member States should therefore be encouraged to use the structural funds to promote their cultural heritage.
c) Program Kultura 2007(2007-2013)
(c) The Culture 2007 Programme (2007-2013)
Obseg in financiranje programa Kultura 2000, ki je do sedaj v veliki meri podpiral projekte v zvezi s kulturno dediščino, sta omejena.
The scope and funding of the Culture 2000 programme which has to-date given considerable support to cultural heritage projects are limited.
Ta program tako ne financira projektov, katerih namen je obnova stavb ali spomenikov.
In addition this programme does not finance projects seeking to restore buildings or monuments.
Zato bi bilo pametno raziskati nove možnosti znotraj novega programa Kultura 2007 (2007-2013).
It would therefore be a good idea to explore new possibilities under the new Culture 2007 programme (2007-2013).
Ker je partnerskim mrežam v državah članicah omogočeno, da v okviru programa Kultura predložijo večletne projekte, bi bilo vredno razmisliti o oblikovanju mreže, recimo, petih ali več v celoti obnovljenih tradicionalnih skupnosti v različnih državah članicah, ki imajo manj kot tisoč prebivalcev.
Given that partner networks in the Member States are given the opportunity of submitting multiannual projects under the Culture programme, consideration could be given to creating a network of, say, five or more fully restored traditional communities with a population of under one thousand situated in different Member States.
V tem primeru bi lahko sprejeli ukrepe za spodbujanje njihove kulturne dediščine z namenom, da bi povečali sodelovanje med tradicionalnimi skupnostmi v Evropi in jim omogočili, da ne samo spodbujajo svoje lokalne kulturne posebnosti temveč tudi svojo evropsko razsežnost.
In this case measures could be taken to promote their cultural heritage with a view to increasing cooperation between traditional communities in Europe, enabling them to promote not only their distinctive local cultures but also their European dimension.
Sodelovanje s Svetom Evrope
Cooperation with the Council of Europe
Svet Evrope ima z mnogimi pobudami, od katerih mnoge prevzema skupaj z Evropsko unijo, pomembno vlogo pri ohranjanju evropske kulturne dediščine.
The Council of Europe, through its numerous initiatives, many taken in cooperation with European Union, is playing an important part in conserving the European cultural heritage.
Primer take pobude je dan evropske dediščine, ob katerem odprejo vrata obiskovalcem spomeniki in kraji, ki v ostalem delu leta običajno niso odprti za javnost.
One example of this is the introduction of European Heritage Day, during which monuments and sites normally closed to the public for the remainder of the year open their doors to visitors.
V zvezi s tem bi se dalo pospešiti pobude za razvoj tradicionalnih skupnosti in arhitekturne dediščine podeželskih in otoških območij zato, da bi se evropska javnost bolj zavedala vrednosti lokalnih spomenikov.
In this connection it would be possible to step up initiatives to develop traditional communities and the architectural heritage of rural and island areas so as to make the European public more aware of the value of local monuments.
EU in države članice morajo nujno upoštevati številne konvencije Sveta Evrope o ohranjanju kulturne, arheološke in arhitekturne dediščine Evrope in po členu 151(3) Pogodbe o ES okrepiti sodelovanje s Svetom.
It is essential for the EU and Member States to take account of the numerous Council of Europe Conventions on the conservation of Europe's cultural, archaeological and architectural heritage and strengthen their cooperation with this body under Article 151(3) of the EC Treaty.
Druge dejavnosti
Other actions
Nazadnje bi kulturno dediščino Evrope lahko spodbujali še z drugimi pobudami, na primer:
Finally, Europe's cultural heritage may be promoted through other specific initiatives such as:
a) organizacija evropskega leta kulturne dediščine, v okviru katerega bi evropske državljane s posebnimi ukrepi osvestili o pomembnosti spodbujanja kulturne dediščine;
(a) the introduction of a 'European Year for Cultural Heritage' with the objective of making European citizens more aware of the importance of promoting their cultural heritage, while making provision for the necessary measures;
b) V "nagrado Evropske unije za kulturno dediščino" organizacije EUROPA NOSTRA bi bilo mogoče uvesti novo kategorijo nagrad za najboljšo celotno obnovo tradicionalne skupnosti, s tem pa bi se spodbudilo prijavljanje skupnosti, ki so v celoti ali deloma ohranile svojo tradicionalno razporeditev.
(b) In connection with the 'European Union Prize for Cultural Heritage', which is administered by Europa Nostra, a new category of awards could be introduced for the best overall restoration of a traditional community, providing a major incentive for communities which have conserved all or part of their traditional configurations to come forward.
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o varstvu evropske naravne in arhitekturne kulturne dediščine na podeželskih in otoških območjih
motion for a European Parliament resolution on the protection of the European natural, architectural and cultural heritage in rural and island regions
Pravna podlaga
Legal base
Prisotna sta bila 2 namestnika iz politične skupine PPE, vendar je bil pri končnem glasovanju upoštevan samo 1 glas.
2 substitute members from PPE were present, but only 1 vote was taken into account for the final vote.
o posebnem poročilu Evropskega računskega sodišča 5/2005 v zvezi z odhodki za tolmačenje, ki jih imajo Parlament, Komisija in Svet z odgovori institucij
on the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 5/2005: Interpretation expenditure incurred by the Parliament, the Commission and the Council
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča 5/2005 v zvezi z odhodki za tolmačenje, ki jih imajo Parlament, Komisija in Svet, z odgovori institucij
– having regard to the European Court of Auditors' Special report No 5/2005: Interpretation expenditure incurred by the Parliament, the Commission and the Council, together with the institutions’ replies
UL C 291, 23.11.2005, str.
OJ C 291, 23.11.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju drugega pododstavka člena 248(4), člena 276(3) in člena 280(5) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, Article 276(3) and Article 280(5) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0261/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0261/2006 ),
Spoštovanje večjezičnosti
Respect for multilingualism
4. meni, da celotni stroški vseh jezikovnih služb institucij EU, tj. prevajanje in tolmačenje, predstavljajo le 1 % celotnega proračuna EU;
Considers that the total cost of all the linguistic services of the EU institutions, translation and interpretation combined, represent merely 1 % of the total EU budget;
Za vse institucije
With regard to all institutions
13. poziva institucije, naj spodbudijo in pospešijo uporabo „lokalnih tolmačev“, če to dovoljuje jezikovna kombinacija, in poudarja, da nacionalne upravne določbe ne smejo biti ovira; ugotavlja, da je potrebno zagotoviti visokokakovostno tolmačenje;
Calls on the institutions to encourage and facilitate the use of 'local interpreters', language combination allowing , and stresses that national administrative provisions must not be an obstacle; notes that a high quality of interpretation must be guaranteed;14.
14. meni, da bi morala Parlament in Komisija pravočasno pripraviti pregled razmerja med redno zaposlenimi tolmači in samostojnimi tolmači za posamezen jezik za razrešnico za leto 2006;
Considers that the Parliament and the Commission should establish an overview on the official/free-lance ratio per language in time for the 2006 discharge;
Za Parlament
With regard to the Parliament
20. odklanja svoje sodelovanje pri ocenjevanju v zvezi z oblikovanjem medinstitucionalnega urada, ki bi zagotavljal tolmačenje vsem institucijam EU, saj je predsedstvo 4. septembra 2005 izjavilo, da ni združljivo z interesi Parlamenta;
Notes its refusal to take part in an evaluation with a view to creating an inter-institutional office providing interpretation service to all EU institutions, this having been considered by the Bureau on 4 September 2005, as incompatible with the interests of Parliament;
23. opozarja, da morajo biti sredstva dodeljena glede na dejanske potrebe uporabnikov; v skladu s členom 1 Kodeksa o večjezičnosti z dne 19. aprila 2004;
Recalls that, pursuant to Article 1 of the Code of Conduct on Multilingualism of 19 April 2004, resources should be allocated taking into consideration the users' real needs;
Poročilo zajema le tolmaške službe in ne prevajalskih služb.
The report covers just interpretation, not translation services.
Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča: uvod
The European Court of Auditors Special Report: Introduction
Evropsko računsko sodišče je 14. novembra 2005 Odboru za proračunski nadzor predstavilo posebno poročilo št. 5/2005 v zvezi z odhodki za tolmačenje, ki jih imajo Parlament, Komisija in Svet.
On 14 November 2005 the European Court of Auditors (ECA) presented its Special Report No 5/2005 concerning interpretation expenditures incurred by Parliament, Commission and Council to the Committee on Budgetary Control.
Enaindvajset jezikov ima status uradnega in delovnega jezika evropskih institucij.
21 languages have the status of official and working languages of the European Institutions.
Službe Komisije zagotavljajo tolmačenje Svetu, Komisiji, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru, Odboru regij in nekaterim agencijam, medtem ko ima Evropski parlament svojo tolmaško službo in zagotavlja tolmačenje Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, Komisiji in Evropskemu računskemu sodišču v Luxembourgu ter včasih tudi Odboru regij.
Commission services provide for interpretation in the Council, the Commission, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and some agencies, whereas the European Parliament has its own interpretation service and provides for the European Ombudsman, the Commission and the ECA in Luxembourg, and on some days for the Committee of the Region.
Leta 2003 je bilo skupno zagotovljenih 150.000 tolmaških dni, od katerih jih je približno 39 % zagotovil Svet, 26 % Komisija v Bruslju, 4 % Komisija v Luxembourgu in 21 % Evropski parlament.
In 2003 a total of 150 000 interpretation days were provided, of which the Council accounted for approximately 39 %, the Commission in Brussels for 26 %, the Commission in Luxembourg 4 % and the European Parliament 21 %.
Izračun Sodišča kaže, da so celotni stroški za tolmačenje v letu 2003 znašali:
A calculation made by the Court shows that in 2003 the overall cost of interpretation was:
· 57.000.000 EUR v Evropskem parlamentu in
· EUR 57 000 000 at the European Parliament, and
· 106.000.000 EUR na Komisiji, Svetu, odborih in v nekaterih agencijah.
· EUR 106 000 000 at the European Commission, the Council, the Committees and some agencies.
Povprečni stroški na tolmača za en tolmaški dan so v Evropskem parlamentu znašali 1.476 EUR, na Komisiji in Svetu pa 1.046 EUR.
The average cost per interpreter of an interpretation day was EUR 1 476 at the European Parliament and EUR 1 046 at the Commission and the Council.
V obdobju od leta 2000 do leta 2003 so Evropski parlament, Svet in Evropska komisija zmanjšali obseg zagotovljenih storitev tolmačenja.
Between 2000 and 2003 the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission have reduce the interpretation service supplied to them.
Namen revizije Evropskega računskega sodišča
Purpose of the ECA audit
Namen revizije je ugotoviti, ali imajo institucije ustrezna orodja in postopke, s katerimi omogočijo, da:
The audit aimed at establishing whether the institutions had adequate tools and procedures to ensure that:
1. zagotovljeno tolmačenje ne presega dejanskih potreb;
1. the interpretation services provided do not exceed the real needs;
2. je mogoče zadovoljiti vse potrebe po tolmačenju;
2. all the interpretation services needed can be provided;
3. je tolmačenje zagotovljeno z najnižjimi možnimi stroški;
3. interpretation services needed can be provided at the lowest possible cost;
4. je tolmačenje visokokakovostno.
4. interpretation is of a high quality.
1) Postopki za preprečevanje zagotavljanja tolmačenja, ki presega dejanske potrebe
1) Procedures applied to avoid providing interpretation services which exceed real needs
Včasih zagotovljena tolmačenja presegajo dejanske potrebe.
On occasions the interpretation services provided exceed the real needs.
Značaj parlamentarnega dela otežuje predvidevanje natančnih potreb po tolmačenjih v Evropskem parlamentu .
Due to the character of parliamentary work it is difficult to forecast precisely the need of interpretation facilities in the European Parliament .
Kljub temu Evropsko računsko sodišče meni, da bi si lahko v večji meri prizadevali za ugotavljanje dejanskih potreb in širjenje osveščanja o stroških.
However, the ECA is of the opinion that a greater effort could be made in view to establishing the real needs and to increasing cost awareness.
Delegacije lahko stroške krijejo iz dodeljenih finančnih sredstev, ki znašajo 2.000.000 EUR na jezik.
To cover the costs, delegations can draw on a financial allocation of EUR 2 000 000 per language.
66 % neporabljenih zneskov se prenese v proračunska sredstva, odobrena za potne stroške delegatov.
66 % of any unused amount is transferred to the budget appropriations covering delegates' travel costs.
Svet meni, da novi pristop deluje dobro ter v celoti spoštuje načelo enakega obravnavanja vseh uradnih in delovnih jezikov.
The Council considers that the new approach is working well, respecting fully the principle of equal treatment of all official and working languages.
V Komisiji Generalni direktorat za tolmačenje sprejema in obdeluje zahteve po tolmačenju centralno.
In the Commission Directorate General Interpretation receives and processes interpretation requests centrally.
Število dodeljenih aktivnih in/ali pasivnih jezikov je pogosto manjše od števila, ki je bilo prvotno zahtevano.
The number of active and/or passive languages assigned is often lower than the number initially requested.