natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
22. aprila 2005 so bili objavljeni standardi ravnanja za vojaško in civilno osebje, vendar ni nobenih pokazateljev, kako so se ta načela izvajala med misijami EVOP v letu 2005, zlasti v zvezi z organiziranim kriminalom, korupcijo, trgovanjem z ljudmi in zlorabo otrok.
Standards of Behaviour for military and civilian personnel were published on April 22, 2005, however there is no indication of how these principles have been applied during the EDSP missions launched in 2005, in particular with regard to organised crime, corruption, human trafficking and child abuse.
Očitno je, da na terenu primanjkuje poznavanja, na primer pri misiji v Demokratični republiki Kongo ni bilo nobenega usposabljanja glede pravic otrok, prav tako niso bile izdane nobene smernice, zaradi tega osebje EVOP ob srečanju z otroki vojaki ni vedelo, kaj storiti.
It is clear that there is a lack of understanding in the field, for example in the mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo, no training on children's rights and the Guidelines has been given, so when ESDP personnel encounter child soldiers they simply have not known what to do.
Delovanje Sveta in Komisije v mednarodnih forumih
The performance of the Council and the Commission in international forums
Letno poročilo govori „močnem vplivu, ki ga ima lahko EU na področju človekovih pravic, če spregovori enoglasno“, to načelo je zlasti primerno ob upoštevanju vpliva, ki ga ima EU v mednarodnih forumih.
The Annual Report speaks of the "powerful impact the EU can have on human rights when it speaks with one voice", a principle that is particularly pertinent when considering the impact the EU has within international forums.
Vseeno je po sodelovanju na 61. seji Komisije ZN za človekove pravice vaš poročevalec ugotovil, da države članice EU porabijo preveč časa za medsebojno razpravljanje o vprašanjih in puščajo premalo časa za povezovanje z drugimi državami ali tistimi, ki bi jih bilo mogoče prepričati, da podprejo stališča EU.
However, having participated in the 61st session of the UN Commission on Human Rights, your Rapporteur has concluded that EU Member States spend too much time discussing issues between themselves, leaving too little time to build bridges with other countries or those that could be persuaded to support EU positions.
Obžalovanja vredna je zavrnitev pokroviteljstva nad resolucijo o Kitajski in ponovno ni bila sprejeta resolucija o Zimbabveju.
It is regrettable that there was refusal to sponsor a resolution on China, and once again there was no resolution on Zimbabwe.
Državam članicam EU ni uspelo prepričati vplivnih vlad v Afriki in drugje, da je v mednarodnih forumih treba zavzeti trdnejše stališče, kljub strogemu obsojanju masovnega prisilnega izseljevanja v Zimbabveju in poskusom za zagotovitev humanitarne pomoči v krizi.
EU Member States have failed to persuade influential governments in Africa and elsewhere of the need to take a stronger stance in international forums, despite its strong condemnation of mass forced evictions in Zimbabwe and attempts to provide humanitarian aid to address the crisis.
EU je zavrnila tudi pokroviteljstvo nad resolucijo o Čečeniji, čeprav je v preteklih letih to storila in čeprav spor ni rešen.
The EU also refused to sponsor a resolution on Chechnya, despite doing so in previous years, and despite no resolution to the conflict.
Lokalne skupine za človekove pravice ocenjujejo, da je od začetka spora leta 1999 „izginilo“ med 3 000 in 5 000 ljudi, ob zajetju so bili vsi civilisti ali neoboroženi.
Local human rights groups estimate that between 3,000 and 5,000 people have “disappeared” since the beginning of the conflict in 1999, all of whom were either civilians or unarmed when taken into custody.
Ruske oblasti zanikajo vsakršno odgovornost za njihovo usodo ali nahajanje.
Russian authorities deny all responsibility for their fate or whereabouts.
Ugotavlja, da ima EU eno pravilo za male države, za velike države pa uporablja drugačno pravilo – kar ni združljivo z načelom univerzalnosti človekovih pravic.
It does suggest that the EU has one rule for small countries, and applies a different one for large countries - hardly compatible with the principle of universality of human rights.
Prav tako izpostavlja neuspeh EU, da bi se skozi leto s tretjimi državami pogajala o skupnih stališčih in o njih razpravljala znotraj drugih dvostranskih političnih, trgovskih in razvojnih stikov, namesto da jih v Ženevi obravnava ločeno.
It also exposes the failure of the EU to negotiate and discuss common positions with third countries as part of other bilateral political, trade and development contacts throughout the year, rather than separate from them in Geneva.
Na splošno je najpomembneje, da pobuda za reformo mehanizmov ZN za človekove pravice uspe.
In general, it is of paramount importance that the initiative to reform the UN human rights machinery succeeds.
Evropska unija je priznala ustanovitev Sveta za človekove pravice za ključno prednostno nalogo, vendar so bile leta 2005 države članice EU presenetljivo počasne pri prizadevanju za ukrepe na področju te bistvene reforme.
The European Union recognized the creation of the Human Rights Council as a key priority, but in 2005 EU Member States seemed surprisingly slow in pushing firmly enough for action on this crucial reform.
EU v mednarodnih forumih še naprej podpira Mednarodno kazensko sodišče, kot je določeno v skupnem stališču EU iz junija 2003.
The EU has continued its support for the International Criminal Court in international forums, as established in the EU Common Position of June 2003, and this strong support in part led to the referral by the UN Security Council of the case of Darfur to the ICC on March 31 2005.
EU in države članice morajo še naprej, kjer je to mogoče, potrjevati svojo zavezanost Mednarodnemu kazenskemu sodišču, zlasti ker skušajo Združene države z državami po svetu še naprej sklepati dvostranske sporazume o imuniteti.
The EU and Member States need to continue to reaffirm their commitment to the ICC whenever possible, particularly as the US continues to seek bilateral immunity agreements with states worldwide.
V skladu z ustaljenim stališčem, da so pravice invalidnih oseb človekove pravice, mora EU povečati podporo Konvenciji ZN o pravicah za invalidne osebe, ki je še vedno predmet pogajanj.
In accordance with the established position that rights for disabled people are human rights, the EU needs to step up its support for a UN Convention on rights of persons with disabilities, still under negotiation.
Na primer EU zavrnitve razumne prilagoditve zdaj ne priznava kot oblike diskriminacije znotraj besedila, ki omogoča prostovoljno izvajanje in s tem zaostaja za obravnavo tega vprašanja v Direktivi 2000/78 ES o enakem obravnavanju.
For example, at the moment the EU does not support the denial of reasonable accommodation as a form of discrimination within the text, which would leave it as a voluntary exercise, falling short of the way the issue was addressed in the 2000/78 EC directive on equal treatment.
Ob tem, kot je navedeno v letnem poročilu, je EU veliko bolj uspešna pri spodbujanju posameznih zadev v tujini, kadar daje doma dober zgled.
Furthermore, as noted in the Annual Report, the EU is much more successful in promoting an issue abroad when it sets a good example at home.
To velja na primer pri spodbujanju podpisovanja, ratificiranja in izvajanja dokumentov o človekovih pravicah.
Such is the case for example, in promoting the signing, ratifying and implementation of human rights instruments.
Medtem ko je EU uspešna pri spodbujanju Rimskega statuta (Mednarodno kazensko sodišče), je veliko manj uspešna pri spodbujanju Izbirnega protokola h Konvenciji ZN proti mučenju.
So whereas, the EU has success in promoting the Rome Statute (ICC), it has considerably less success promoting the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture.
Za verodostojno delovanje na mednarodnem prizorišču morajo biti države članice EU trdne pri določanju datumov za ratifikacijo vseh ključnih konvencij o človekovih pravicah in njihovih izbirnih protokolov.
To have credibility on the international stage, EU Member States need to be firm in setting dates for the ratification of all key human rights conventions and their optional protocols.
Podobno številne agencije ugotavljajo, da obstoječa politika EU na področju nezakonitega priseljevanja iskalcem azila omejuje uveljavljanje človekovih pravic.
Similarly, many agencies suggest that existing EU policies to address illegal migration have moved so far as to curtail the ability of asylum seekers to exercise their human rights.
Nove pilotne pobude za programe za regionalno zaščito v državah, kot je Tanzanija, so ključni preskus, ali si EU resnično prizadeva za izboljšanje zaščite beguncev ali želi preprosto zmanjšati število beguncev, ki iščejo zaščito v Evropi.
The new pilot initiatives for Regional Protection Programmes in third countries such as Tanzania provide a key test as to whether the EU is genuinely committed to enhancing refugee protection or is simply motivated to diminish the numbers of refugees seeking protection in Europe itself.
Pregledovanje političnih dialogov EU in dialogov EU o človekovih pravicah s tretjimi državami ter v zvezi z akcijskimi načrti sosedske politike:
Scrutinising EU political and human rights dialogues with third countries, and in relation to the Action Plans in the Neighbourhood Policy:
EU je vzpostavila uradne dialoge o človekovih pravicah s tremi državami, Kitajsko (od leta 1996), Iranom (od leta 2002) in nazadnje z Rusijo (z začetkom v letu 2005) z namenom spodbujanja agende EU kot „prepričljive oblasti in ne kot predpisujoče oblasti“.
The EU has established formal human rights dialogues with three countries, China (since 1996), Iran (since 2002) and most recently Russia (starting in 2005), aimed at promoting the EU’s agenda as “a convincing power rather than an imposing power”.
Svet je iskren glede učinka teh dialogov, letno poročilo navaja, da „so ti dialogi prinesli različne rezultate“.
The Council is honest about the effect of these Dialogues, in the Annual Report it is stated that “these dialogues have had mixed results”.
Gotovo je, da sta bila dialoga s Kitajsko in Iranom v letu 2005 ocenjena v skladu s smernicami EU za dialoge o človekovih pravicah.
It is positive that there was an evaluation of the China and Iran dialogues in 2005, in line with the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Dialogues.
V zadnjem desetletju so se dialogi s Kitajsko izboljšali, zlasti ker se zdaj osredotočajo na posebne teme, in zdi se, da je več pripravljenosti za sodelovanje v dejanski razpravi, pri čemer istočasno z dialogi potekajo tudi seminarji nevladnih organizacij.
Dialogues with China have improved over the past decade, particularly as they now focus attention on specific themes, and there appears to be more willingness to engage in concrete discussion, with the NGO seminars occurring at the same time as the dialogues.
Vseeno je zaradi dialogov o človekovih pravicah vprašanje človekovih pravic pogosto povsem izključeno iz dnevnega reda srečanj na vrhu.
However, the existence of the human rights dialogue means that human rights issues are often completely off the agenda at Summit meetings.
EU se je obširno posvetovala pred dialogi, vseeno so obstajale skrbi v zvezi z nekaterimi vprašanji, ki niso bila obravnavana v dialogih, na primer položaj beguncev iz Severne Koreje.
The EU did widely consult prior to the dialogues, however there were concerns at particular issues that were not raised at the dialogues, for example the case of North Korean refugees.
Dialog z Rusijo, čeprav je zelo nov, do zdaj še ni zelo cenjen.
The Russia dialogue, whilst very new, is so far not held in very high regard.
Rusija še vedno zavrača sejo dialoga v Rusiji, kar pomeni, da domače nevladne organizacije dejansko ne morejo biti navzoče in predložiti svojih primerov.
Russia still refuses to hold a session of the dialogue in Russia, which means that it is virtually impossible for a range of domestic NGOs to attend and put forward their case.
Obstaja resnična skrb zaradi političnih sprememb v Rusiji vse od pokola v Beslanu leta 2004 in zaradi stalne kritike razmer v Čečeniji.
There is real concern over political changes in Russia since the Beslan massacre in 2004, and with continued criticism of the situation in Chechnya.
Države članice EU morajo še naprej pritiskati na Iran, da privoli v datum za naslednji dialog, kljub očitni prezaposlenosti z razpravami o iranskem jedrskem programu.
EU Member States need to remain committed to pushing Iran to agree to a date for the next dialogue, despite obvious preoccupations with discussions over Iran’s nuclear programme.
EU je v preteklosti s težavo določala načrte z jasnimi merili in strateškimi cilji za dialoge.
The EU has in the past found it difficult to put into place plans with definite benchmarks and strategic goals for the dialogues.
To je nujno, da se doseže kakršen koli napredek in kakršno koli merjenje učinka, podatki v zvezi s srečanji, vključno z njihovimi izidi, pa morajo biti veliko bolj splošno dostopni in odprti za parlamentarni pregled.
This is essential if there is to be any progress and any measurement of the impact, and information relating to the meetings, including their outcome, needs to be much more widely available and open to parliamentary scrutiny.
Treba je oceniti učinkovitost vseh političnih dialogov in ne le strukturiranih dialogov o človekovih pravicah; to pa je brez vseh podatkov nemogoče.
There is a need to assess the efficiency of all political dialogues not just the structured human rights dialogues; however this is impossible in the complete absence of information.
Če so te razprave proaktivno vodene, so lahko zelo pomembno orodje, osrednja točka za to mora biti Svet za človekove pravice, s strateškim pregledom.
These discussions are potentially a highly important tool if proactively managed, the focal point for which has to be COHOM, with a strategic overview.
Kakovost oddelka za človekove pravice v novih akcijskih načrtih sosedske politike se med državami zelo razlikuje, ker se o načrtu pogaja z zadevno državo in se je zato treba o njem dogovoriti.
The quality of the section on human rights in the new Neighbourhood Policy Action Plans varies greatly between countries, as the plan is negotiated with the country concerned and therefore has to be agreed with them.
Na primer, vprašanje človekovih pravic je komaj omenjeno v akcijskih načrtih za Izrael in Egipt, ker tega nočeta sprejeti.
For example, there is scarce mention of human rights issues in the Action Plans for Israel and Egypt, as they would not accept this.
Ena od možnosti za pomoč, uradna in neuradna, tem dialogom o človekovih pravicah je možnost razširitve pododborov partnerskih svetov, kar že obstaja v JV Aziji.
One possibility to aid these human rights dialogues, both formal and informal, is the possibility of extending subcommittees of Partnership Councils, as already exists in SE Asia.
Obravnava izvajanja klavzule o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji
Consideration of the implementation of the human rights and democracy clause
Oktobra 2005 je bil dosežen pomemben precedens, ko je EU prvič delno prekinila Sporazum o partnerstvu in sodelovanju zaradi nespoštovanja klavzule o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji s strani Uzbekistana.
An important precedent was reached in October 2005, when the EU for the first time ever partially suspended a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement for non-compliance with the human rights and democracy clause in the case of Uzbekistan.
Žal je Nemčija kršila prepoved, ko je ministru za notranje zadeve podelila vizo za zdravljenje v Nemčiji več dni pred objavo seznama.
Unfortunately, Germany flouted the ban by granting a visa to the Minister for Interior to receive medical treatment in Germany days before list was published.
To je bil gotovo zelo pomemben precedens, vendar je dejstvo, da je bilo za kakršne koli resne učinke klavzule potrebno toliko časa, tudi negativno v zvezi s pomanjkanjem resnega upoštevanja klavzul o človekovih pravicah v drugih sporazumih v preteklosti.
This was certainly a very important precedent, but the fact that it has taken this long for the clause to have any real consequences is also a sad commentary on the lack of seriousness given to human rights clauses in other agreements in the past.
Na primer, EU še naprej obravnava odnose z Bližnjim vzhodom in sosedami severne Afrike prvotno kot trgovinske in gospodarske, čeprav evro-sredozemski sporazumi vključujejo klavzule o človekovih pravicah.
For example, the EU continues to see relations with Middle East and North African neighbours as primarily of trade and economic assistance, even though the EuroMed agreements include human rights clauses.
V primeru pridružitvenega sporazuma med EU in Egiptom je to začelo veljati junija 2004 in klavzulo o človekovih pravicah je treba še uveljaviti, kljub resnim vprašanjem v letu 2005, kot so rutinsko mučenje, sedanje izredno stanje s samovoljnimi pripori in sojenji na vojaških sodiščih in sodiščih državne varnosti ter približno petnajst tisoč ljudi v podaljšanem priporu brez obsodbe.
In the case of the EU-Egypt association agreement, this entered into force in June 2004, and the human rights clause is yet to be invoked despite serious issues in 2005 such as routine torture, ongoing emergency rule with arbitrary detention and trials before military and state security courts, and approximately fifteen thousand people in prolonged detention without charge.
Razmere so podobne v primeru sporazumov EU, med drugimi, s Tunizijo (1999) in Izraelom (2000).
It is a similar situation with EU agreements with Tunisia (1999) and Israel (2000) amongst others.
V primeru Tunizije je EU 30. septembra pred Svetovnim vrhom o informacijski družbi v Tunisu sopodpisala ostro izjavo o ovirah za svobodo izražanja in nevladnih organizacij.
Concerning Tunisia, the EU co-signed a sharp statement on 30 September before the World Summit on Information Society in Tunis, concerned by curbs on free expression and NGOs.
Vseeno je pridružitveni sporazum med EU in Tunizijo ostal veljaven, kljub nespoštovanju človekovih pravic in oviranju subvencij EU za nevladne organizacije, vključno s Tunizijsko ligo za človekove pravice.
However, the EU-Tunisia Association Agreement remained in force, despite the human rights record and its blocking of EU grants to NGOs, including the Tunisian Human Rights League.
Evropski parlament sprejema stališče o človekovih pravicah v poročilu Agnoletto (INI 2005/2057), ki jasno navaja, da je treba klavzule brez izjeme vključiti v vse splošne in sektorske sporazume s tretjimi državami ter da morajo biti del vseh državnih in regionalnih strategij.
The European Parliament adopts its position on human rights clauses in the Agnoletto report (INI 2005/2057), which clearly states that clauses should be inserted into all general and sectoral agreements with third countries without exception, and must form part of all country and regional strategies.
Nedvomno mora obstajati „srednja pot“ ali več možnosti, ki ne vodijo EU iz ene skrajnosti (neukrepanje) v drugo (opustitev), kar je težava zdajšnjega sistema, ki je odvisen od volje držav članic in Komisije.
There undoubtedly needs to be a ‘middle way’ or a series of options that doesn’t take the EU from one extreme (inaction) to the other (suspension), which is the problem with the current system which relies on the will of the Member States and the Commission.
Drsno lestvico meril je treba osnovati glede na stopnjo zlorabe človekovih pravic in lahko vključuje merila, kot so politični dialog, demarše, javne izjave, prerazporeditev sredstev, embargo na orožje ali drugi trgovski embargi, prekinitev sporazuma, umik programov sodelovanja in razvoja, zamrznitev financiranja/proračunske pomoči, prepoved izdaje vizumov in zamrznitev sredstev.
A sliding scale of measures should be based according to the level of abuse of human rights, and could include such measures as political dialogue, demarches, public statements, reallocation of funding, arms or other trade embargos, suspension of agreements, withdrawal of cooperation and development programmes, freezing of funding/budgetary support, visa bans, and the freezing of assets.
Očitno je, da si mora EU še bolj prizadevati za vključevanje teh vprašanj v celotno svoje delovanje, kot je bilo to prvič izpostavljeno v sporočilu Komisije iz leta 2001.
There is a clear need for the EU to work harder at mainstreaming, a policy that was first outlined in the Commission Communication of 2001.
Komisija o izvajanju tega sporočila ni še nikoli poročala, zato naj to stori čim prej.
The Commission itself has never reported on implementation of the Communication and should now do so.
Še vedno je tematika človekovih pravic vse prepogosto opuščena zaradi močnega nasprotovanja ali pa postane del pogajanj, ko se pojavijo drugi interesi.
It still appears that too often human rights are dispensed with in the face of strong opposition or become negotiable when confronted with other interests.
Obravnava učinkovitosti posredovanj Evropskega parlamenta v primerih, povezanih s človekovimi pravicami
Considering the effectiveness of the European Parliament's own interventions in cases of human rights
Letno poročilo upravičeno navaja, da je Parlament „dolgo razmišljal o spodbujanju in varstvu človekovih pravic v EU in zunaj nje, kot o eni od pomembnih dejavnosti“ ter da „je Parlament pogosto na samem vrhu razvoja človekovih pravic in zagotavlja, da bodo ostale institucije EU ohranjale človekove pravice v središču pozornosti“.
The Annual Report rightly states that the Parliament has "long considered the promotion and protection of human rights, both inside and outside the EU, as one of its essential functions", and that "Parliament is frequently at the cutting edge of developing human rights and ensures that the other EU institutions keep human rights to the forefront of their attentions".
K doseganju tega cilja je veliko pripomogel pododbor za človekove pravice, ustanovljen po evropskih volitvah 2004.
This objective has been greatly aided by the establishment of the Human Rights Sub Committee following the European Elections in 2004.
Pododbor je v letu 2005 sprožil številne dobre pobude, na primer opredelitev smernic za obiske v tretjih državah, in mnoge obravnave, na primer obravnave človekovih pravic v Vietnamu, Kambodži in Laosu, ki so potekale septembra.
The Sub Committee throughout 2005 has enjoyed several good initiatives, such as producing the guidelines for visits to third countries, and a number of hearings, for example the hearing on human rights in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, held in September.
Pododbor je bil zlasti dejaven tudi v boju proti posameznim krivicam po vsem svetu, tako kot tudi predsednik Parlamenta.
The Sub-Committee has also been particularly active in standing up for cases of individual injustice throughout the world, as has Parliament's President himself.
Treba je tudi okrepiti prizadevanja za boljše spremljanje delovnih programov Sveta in Komisije z namenom večjega učinka na politiko in načrtovanja ter okrepitve vloge pregleda.
There is also a need to consolidate efforts to follow the work programmes of the Council and Commission more closely, in order to have greater impact on policy and programming and to strengthen the role of scrutiny.
Da se to omogoči, mora pododbor natančneje spremljati delo Sveta za človekove pravice in biti navzoč pri poročanju.
To enable this, the Sub Committee should monitor more closely the work of COHOM, also attending de-briefing sessions.
Največja težava učinkovitosti ukrepov Parlamenta je pomanjkanje spremljanja in težnja, da se vprašanje včasih ne razreši dokončno, ko ni več v središču zanimanja medijev.
The largest problem with the effectiveness of the Parliament’s actions is the lack of follow-up, and a tendency not always to take an issue fully to its conclusion once out of the media spotlight.