natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vseeno pa lahko v primeru, če nacionalni ukrep ni pravočasno sporočen, druga država članica ali Komisija od zadevne države članice zahteva ustrezne informacije.
However, where a national measure has not been communicated within the proper deadline, another Member State or the Commission may ask the Member State concerned for information on it.
Poročevalec se je odločil to možnost dodati zato, da se države članice medsebojno nadzorujejo, kadar izmenjava informacij ne poteka pravilno.
Your rapporteur has decided to add this option so that Member States can keep checks on each other where the exchange of information is not properly carried out.
– Izmenjava informacij na politični ravni:
- Exchange of information at political level:
Kot dodatek k izmenjavi na upravni ravni poročevalec predlaga, da vsaka država članica dvakrat letno pripravi poročilo, v katerem predstavi in analizira najnovejše predpise, ki jih je sprejela na nacionalni ravni, in njihove možne vplive na evropski ravni.
To complement the exchanges at administrative level, your rapporteur proposes that each Member State should submit a twice-yearly report explaining and analysing the most recent national measures and their likely impact at EU level.
Poročilo bo dostopno v omrežju in bo dopolnilo spletne podatke, hkrati pa bo ponudilo podlago za razprave med političnimi organi.
These reports would be available on the network and would serve as a basis for the discussions among the political authorities.
Druge države in Komisija lahko o poročilu, ki dejansko nakazuje politične smernice, zahtevajo dodatne informacije.
The other Member States and the Commission could ask for information additional to this political orientation text.
Naprošena država članica jih posreduje v roku štirih tednov.
The deadline for forwarding the additional information would be four weeks.
Poročevalec ocenjuje, da je pomembno zagotoviti jasne, berljive in razumljive informacije o sprejetih odločitvah na nacionalni ravni.
Your rapporteur considers it is vital to supply information that is clear, readable and comprehensible on the decisions taken at national level.
Poročila z razlago so primernejša za politične razprave kot zakonodajna besedila v prvotni različici, ki so običajno zapletena.
Explanatory reports of this nature are more suitable for political debate than legislative texts in the original language, which tend to be complex.
Na tej osnovi bodo politični organi razpravljali o najnovejših že sprejetih ali načrtovanih ukrepih, ki jih posamezne države na področju azila in priseljevanja pripravljajo na nacionalni ravni .
Thus, the political authorities would debate the most recent measures taken or proposed by each Member State in the fields of asylum and immigration.
Izmenjava stališč na tej ravni je bistvenega pomena za bolj usklajene politike priseljevanja v Evropi.
Exchanges of views at this level are essential if we are to improve the coordination of migration policies in the Union.
Kot pomemben politični dejavnik mora v postopku sodelovati tudi Evropski parlament.
As a key political player, the European Parliament must also be involved in this procedure.
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga Odločbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi postopka vzajemnega obveščanja glede ukrepov držav članic na področjih azila in priseljevanja ( KOM(2005)0480 – C6–0335/2005 – 2005/0204(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a Council decision on the establishment of a mutual information procedure concerning Member States’ measures in the areas of asylum and immigration ( COM(2005)0480 – C6‑0335/2005 – 2005/0204(CNS) )
v pismu z dne 4. aprila 2006 ste Odbor za pravne zadeve v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika zaprosili za mnenje o pravilnosti in primernosti pravne podlage zgoraj omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 4 April 2006 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2) of the Rules of Procedure to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Predlog odločbe Komisije temelji na členu 66 pogodbe ES.
The Commission's proposal for a Council decision is based on Article 66 of the EC Treaty.
V predlogu se vzpostavlja postopek za vzajemno izmenjavo informacij, ki se nanašajo na nacionalne ukrepe na področju azila in priseljevanja, z uporabo spletnega omrežja in hkrati omogoča izmenjavo stališč o takšnih ukrepih.
The proposal establishes a procedure for the mutual exchange of information concerning national measures in the areas of asylum and immigration using a web-based network and allowing for an exchange of views on such measures.
Od 1. maja 2004 so v skladu s Protokolom o členu 67 pogodbe iz Nice ti ukrepi sprejeti na podlagi glasovanja s kvalificirano večino v Svetu in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
Since 1 May 2004, pursuant to the Protocol on Article 67 of the Nice Treaty, such measures have been adopted by a qualified majority vote in the Council and after consulting the European Parliament.
Glede na dejstvo, da se predlog nanaša na nekatere določbe direktiv, ki temeljijo na členu 63 pogodbe ES, ki države članice zavezuje, da Komisijo obveščajo o določbah nacionalnega prava, ki jih sprejmejo na področjih iz omenjenih direktiv, je vaš odbor zaprosil Odbor za pravne zadeve za mnenje o tem, ali je primerna pravna podlaga predloga člen 63 pogodbe ES, torej isti člen pogodbe ES, ki služi za pravno podlago prej omenjenih direktiv.
In view of the fact that the proposal refers to certain provisions of directives based on Article 63 of the EC Treaty which impose obligations on Member States to inform the Commission of the provisions of national law adopted in the fields covered by these directives, your committee has sought the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs, as to whether the appropriate legal basis for the proposal should be Article 63 of the EC Treaty, the same article of the EC Treaty as that which is used as the legal basis for the aforementioned directives.
Odbor je zadevo obravnaval na seji 3. maja 2006.
The Committee considered the above question at its meeting of 3 May 2006.
Splošne opombe o pravni podlagi
General remarks on the legal basis
Iz ustaljene prakse Sodišča je razvidno, da izbira pravne podlage ne sme biti subjektivna, pač pa "mora temeljiti na objektivnih dejavnikih, ki jih je mogoče sodno preskusiti",
It is clear from settled case-law of the Court of Justice that the choice of legal basis is not a subjective one, but "must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review"
Primer 45/86, Komisija proti Svetu [1987] ECR 1493, odstavek 11. kot sta denimo cilj in vsebina zadevnega ukrepa.
Case 45/86 Commission v Council [1987] ECR 1493, para.
Še več, odločilni dejavnik mora biti glavni cilj ukrepa.
11. , such as the aim and content of the measure in question
Namen in vsebina predloga
Purpose and content of the proposal
Namen predloga je vzpostaviti postopek za vzajemno izmenjavo podatkov, ki se nanašajo na nacionalne ukrepe na področju azila in priseljevanja, z uporabo spletno zasnovanega omrežja, ter hkrati omogočiti izmenjavo stališč o takšnih ukrepih.
The purpose of the proposal is to establish a procedure for the mutual exchange of information concerning national measures in the areas of asylum and immigration using a web-based network and allowing for an exchange of views on such measures.
Podatki bodo Komisiji posredovani preko spletno zasnovanega omrežja.
The information is to be transmitted through a web-based network run by the Commission.
Nekatere določbe obstoječe zakonodaje Skupnosti države članice zavezujejo, da Komisiji sporočijo besedilo določb nacionalne zakonodaje, sprejetih na področjih, ki jih omenjene direktive urejajo
Certain provisions of existing Community legislation impose an obligation on Member States to communicate to the Commission the text of the provisions of national law which they adopt in the fields covered by the directives in question
Glej na primer:
See. for example:
· člen 8(2) Direktive Sveta 2001/40/ES [medsebojno priznavanje odločb o izgonu], temelječe na členu 63(3) pogodbe ES);
· Article 8(2) of Council Directive 2001/40/EC (mutual recognition of expulsion decisions; based on Article 63(3) EC);
· člen 7(3) Direktive Sveta 2001/51/EC (ki dopolnjuje določbe člena 26 schengenskega sporazuma); temelječe na členu 61(1) in členu 63(3)(b) pogodbe ES);
· Article 7(3) of Council Directive 2001/51/EC (supplementing the provisions of Article 26 of the Schengen Agreement; based on Articles 61(1)(a) and 63(3) b) EC);
· člen 27(2) Direktive Sveta 2001/55/ES [začasna zaščita], temelječe na členu 63(2)(a) in (b) pogodbe ES);
· Article 27(2) of Council Directive 2001/55/EC (temporary protection; based on Article 63(2)(a) and (b) EC);
· člen 4(2) Direktive Sveta 2002/90/ES [pomoč pri nedovoljenem vstopu], temelječe na členu 61(1) in členu 63(3)(b) pogodbe ES);
· Article 4(2) of Council Directive 2002/90/EC (facilitation of unauthorised entry; based on Articles 61(a) and 63(3)(b) EC);
· člen 10(2) Direktive Sveta 2003/110/ES [pomoč pri reparticiji po zračni poti], temelječe na členu 63(3) pogodbe ES);
· Article 10(2) of Council Directive 2003/110/EC (assistance in removal by air; based on Article 63(3)(b) EC);
· člen 26(2) Direktive Sveta [standardi za sprejem prosilcev za azil], temelječe na členu 63(1) pogodbe ES);
· Article 26(2) of Council Directive 2003/9/EC (standards for reception of asylum-seekers; based on Article 63(1)(b) EC);
· člen 38(2) Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES [začasna zaščita], temelječe na členu 63(1)(c), 63(2)(a) in 63(3)(c) pogodbe ES);
· Article 38(2) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC (qualifications directive; based on Article 63(1(c), (2)(a) and (3)(a) EC);
· člen 17(2) Direktive Sveta 2005/71/ES [direktiva o raziskovalcih], temelječe na členu 63(3)(a) in 63(4) pogodbe ES);
· Article 17(2) of Council Directive 2005/71/EC (researchers directive; based on Article 63(3)(a) and (4) EC);
Člen 43(3) Direktive Sveta 2005/85/EC [minimalni standardi za postopke dodeljevanja azila]; temelječe na členu 63(1)(d) pogodbe ES). .
· Article 43, third para., of Council Directive 2005/85/EC (minimum standards on asylum procedures; based on Article 63(1)(d) EC). .
Da bi poenostavili upravne postopke, predlog v členu 3 (glej tudi uvodno izjavo 6) vsebuje določbo, s katerimi se državi članici omogoča posredovanje informacij preko omrežja, zasnovanega v skladu s predlagano odločbo.
The proposal contains in Article 3 (see also recital 6) a provision giving Member States the possibility to provide such information using the network established by the proposed Decision, in order to simplify administrative procedures.
Iz namena in vsebine predloga Sklepa Sveta je razvidno, da je ustrezna pravno podlaga zanj člen 66 pogodbe ES.
It follows from the purpose and content of the proposed Council decision that the correct legal basis for the proposal is Article 66 of the EC Treaty.
Glavni cilj predloga je vzpostavitve foruma za vzajemno obveščanje in izmenjavo stališč o nacionalnih ukrepih glede azila in priseljevanja preko spletno zasnovanega omrežja, ki omogoča izmenjavo stališč o takšnih ukrepih.
The main objective of the proposal is to provide a forum for the mutual exchange of information and views on national asylum and immigration measures by establishing a procedure for the mutual exchange of information using a web-based network and allowing for an exchange of views on such measures.
Sodeč po členu 1 in uvodnih izjavah 1, 3 in 7, želi predlog doseči tesnejše praktično sodelovanje med državami članicami, zlasti z omogočanjem varne izmenjave podatkov in posvetovanja med državami članicami.
The proposal is aimed, as appears from Article 1 and also from recitals 1, 3 and 7, at achieving closer practical cooperation between Member States, and in particular at providing secure information exchange and consultation between Member States.
Kot izhaja zlasti iz člena 4, predlog vzpostavlja postopek za sodelovanje med upravami državami članic ter med njimi in Komisijo.
As follows in particular from Article 4, the proposal establishes a procedure for cooperation between the administrations of the Member States and between those administrations and the Commission.
V skladu s členom 4 predloga se bo za izmenjavo informacij uporabljalo spletno zasnovano omrežje.
Pursuant to Article 4 of the proposal, a web-based network will be used for the exchange of information.
V skladu z odstavkoma 3 in 5 člena 4 se bo omrežje vzpostavilo z uporabo že obstoječega tehnično-računalniškega okolja v okviru vseevropskega telematskega omrežja Skupnosti za izmenjavo podatkov med upravami.
According to paragraphs 3 and 5 of Article 4, the network will be set up by using the existing technical platform within the Community framework of the trans-European telematic network for the interchange of data between administrations.
Poleg tega bodo države članice določile kontaktne točke, prek katerih bo možen dostop do omrežja.
Furthermore, national contact points having access to the network will be designated by the Member States.
Z drugimi besedami, v predlogu so vsebovani ukrepi za zagotovitev sodelovanja med zadevnimi upravnimi enotami držav članic na področju azila in priseljevanja ter sodelovanje med njimi in Komisijo.
In other words, the proposal contains measures to ensure cooperation between the relevant departments of the administrations of the Member States in the areas of asylum and immigration, as well as between those departments and the Commission.
Pravna podlaga takih ukrepov je člen 66 pogodbe ES.
Such measures are covered by the legal basis of Article 66 of the EC Treaty.
V tem členu je podana izrecna pravna podlaga za upravno sodelovanje med državami članicami in Komisijo.
That article provides an explicit legal basis for administrative cooperation between the Member States and with the Commission.
Člen se osredotoča na praktično sodelovanje med nacionalnimi upravami v obliki, na primer, izmenjave podatkov, vzpostavitve nacionalnih kontaktnih točk, ukrepov glede infrastrukture itd.
The article focuses on practical cooperation between national administrations, in the form of, for example, exchanges of information, the setting-up of national contact points, infrastructure measures, etc.
Ustrezna pravna podlaga za predlog sklepa Sveta je torej člen 66 pogodbe ES.
The appropriate legal basis for the proposed Council decision should therefore be Article 66 of the EC Treaty.
Na podlagi člena 3 predloga ni mogoče priti do drugačnega zaključka.
No other conclusion can be drawn from Article 3 of the proposal.
Iz nobenega člena ne izhaja, da je pravilna pravna podlaga predloga člen 63 pogodbe ES.
It cannot be concluded from that article that the correct legal basis for the proposal should be Article 63 of the EC Treaty.
Člen 3 predlagane odločbe predvideva, da kadar so države članice dolžne Komisijo obveščati o določbah nacionalnega prava, ki jih sprejmejo na področjih iz direktiv, nastalih na podlagi člena 63 pogodbe, se takšne obveznosti razumejo kakor izpolnjene, ko so podatki posredovane prek omrežja.
Article3 of the proposed decision provides that whenever Member States have an obligation to inform the Commission of the provisions of national law which they adopt in the fields covered by the directives based on Article 63 of the Treaty, such obligations shall be deemed to be fulfilled if the information is transmitted through the network.
To pomeni, da je državam članicam dana možnost, da podatke, zahtevane v omenjenih direktivah, posredujejo preko omrežja, zasnovanega v skladu s predlagano odločbo, da bi tako poenostavili upravne postopke.
This means that Member States are given the possibility to provide the information required by those directives using the network established by the proposed decision in order to simplify administrative procedures.
Člen 3 torej vsebuje samo postopkovno določbo.
Article 3 thus contains a merely procedural provision.
S tem členom niso postavljene dodatne zahteve.
No additional requirements are created by that article.
Obveznosti držav članic, izhajajoče iz prej omenjenih direktiv, temelječih na členu 63, se s predlogom ne spreminjajo, prilagodijo ali dopolnjujejo.
The obligations of the Member States which follow from the abovementioned directives based on Article 63 are not changed, modified or supplemented by the proposal.
Zato je Odbor za pravne zadeve na svoji seji 3. maja 2006 soglasno
At its meeting of 3 May 2006 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili prisotni:: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Diana Wallis (pripravljavka mnenja), Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Manuel Medina Ortega in Aloyzas Sakalas. sklenil priporočiti, da je ustrezna pravna podlaga predloga člen 66 pogodbe ES.
The following were present for the final vote: Giuseppe Gargani (chairman), Diana Wallis (draftswoman), Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Manuel Medina Ortega and Aloyzas Sakalas. , to recommend that the appropriate legal basis for the proposal should be Article 66 of the EC Treaty.
Predlog Odločbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi postopka vzajemnega obveščanja glede ukrepov držav članic na področjih azila in priseljevanja
Proposal for a Council decision on the establishment of a mutual information procedure concerning Member States' measures in the areas of asylum and immigration
Poročevalec(ka): Datum imenovanja
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed
Poenostavljeni postopek - datum sklepa
Simplified procedure – date of decision Date of decision
Posvetovanje z Ekonomsko-socialnim odborom - datum sklepa na zasedanju
Parliament to consult European Economic and Social Committee – date decided in plenary
Posvetovanje z Odborom regij - datum sklepa na zasedanju
Parliament to consult Committee of the Regions – date decided in plenary
o pobudi Republike Avstrije, Republike Finske in Kraljevine Švedske za sprejetje okvirnega sklepa Sveta o evropskem izvršilnem nalogu in premestitvi obsojenih oseb med državami članicami Evropske unije
on the initiative by the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden for adoption of a Council framework decision on the European enforcement order and the transfer of sentenced persons between Member States of the European Union
– ob upoštevanju pobude Republike Avstrije, Republike Finske in Kraljevine Švedske (7307/2005)
– having regard to the the initiative by the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden (7307/2005)
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0139/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0139/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 93 in člena 51 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 93 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0187/2006 )
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0187/2006 )
5. pooblašča predsednika, da pošlje svoje mnenje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam Republike Avstrije, Republike Finske in Kraljevine Švedske.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission and the government of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden.
Besedilo, ki ga predlagajo Republika Avstrija, Republika Finska in Kraljevina Švedska
Text proposed by the the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden
o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o evropskem izvršilnem nalogu in premestitvi obsojenih oseb med državami članicami Evropske Unije
on the proposal of a Council Framework Decision on the European enforcement order and the transfer of sentenced persons between Member States
o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb v kazenskih zadevah, ki uvaja zaporne kazni ali ukrepe, ki vključujejo odvzem prostosti zaradi izvrševanja v Evropski uniji
on the proposal of a Council Framework Decision on the application of the principle of mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union
Naslov Okvirnega sklepa se spremeni zaradi sprememb, ki jih je sprejela delovna skupina Sveta in da se poudarita bistvena vidika dokumenta: vzajemno priznavanje in izvrševanje zapornih kazni.
The title of the Framework Decision is amended following the changes in the Council Working Group and in order to put the emphasis on two essential aspects of the document: the mutual recognition and the enforcement of custodial sentences.
Priznavanje in izvrševanje ne smeta potekati na podlagi „evropskega izvršilnega naloga“, ampak na podlagi sodb in potrdila .
The recognition and enforcement should not take place on the basis of a 'European enforcement order' but on the basis of the judgment and a certificate.
(5) Odnosi med državami članicami, za katere je značilno posebno vzajemno zaupanje v pravne sisteme drugih držav članic, bi morali preseči obstoječe instrumente Sveta Evrope s področja premestitve oseb zaradi izvršitve kazni.
(5) Relations between the Member States, which are characterised by special mutual confidence in other Member States' legal systems, should go further than the existing Council of Europe instruments on transfer for enforcement purposes.
Treba je ugotoviti, da je osnovna dolžnost države izvršiteljice, da prevzame odgovornost za tiste svoje državljane in tiste osebe s stalnim prebivališčem na svojem ozemlju, ki so bili v drugi državi članici pravnomočno obsojeni na zaporno kazen ali ukrep odvzema prostosti, ne glede na njihovo soglasje, razen če ne obstajajo posebni razlogi za zavrnitev.
It should be established that there is a basic duty on the executing State to take charge of those of its nationals and those persons permanently legally resident in its territory who have been given a final custodial sentence or a detention order in another Member State, irrespective of their consent, unless there are specific reasons for refusal.
(5) Odnosi med državami članicami, za katere je značilno posebno vzajemno zaupanje v pravne sisteme drugih držav članic, bi morali preseči obstoječe instrumente Sveta Evrope s področja premestitve oseb zaradi izvršitve kazni in omogočiti priznavanje sodnih odločb države izvršiteljice, ki jih izdajo organi države izdajateljice .
(5) Relations between the Member States, which are characterised by special mutual confidence in other Member States' legal systems, should go further than the existing Council of Europe instruments on transfer for enforcement purposes and enable recognition by the executing State of decisions taken by the issuing State’s authorities.
Ne glede na potrebo po zagotavljanju ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepov obsojenim osebam njihova vpletenost v sodne postopke ne sme več prevladovati pri zahtevi o njihovem soglasju za posredovanje sodbe drugi državi članici zaradi priznavanja in izvrševanja izrečene kazenske sankcije.
Notwithstanding the necessity of providing the sentenced person with adequate safeguards, his or her involvement in the proceedings should no longer be dominant by requiring his or her consent to the forwarding of a judgment to another Member State for the purpose of its recognition and enforcement of the sentence imposed.
Za pospeševanje razvoja sodelovanja v zvezi z izvrševanjem kazenskih sodb.
To further the development of the cooperation concerning the enforcement of criminal judgment.
V skladu z Dodatnim protokolom iz leta 1997 h Konvenciji Sveta Evrope iz leta 1983, ki omejuje področje uporabe soglasja obsojenih oseb.
In accordance with the 1997 Additional Protocol to the 1983 Convention of the Council of Europe which restricts the scope of the sentences person's consent.