natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Začasna in prehodna prva faza bo vodila v izboljšanje sedanjega sistema nacionalnih prispevkov, za katerega bi morala veljati naslednja politična načela:
The provisional and transitional first phase would lead to an improvement of the current system of national contributions, for which the following political principles should be applied:
· enakost med državami članicami
· equality between Member States
· preprosta predstavitev sistema izvoljenim predstavnikom in državljanom
· simplicity of presentation for elected representatives and citizens alike
· solidarnost in enako dostojanstvo med državami članicami
· solidarity and equal dignity amongst Member States
· vzpostavitev politične povezave med reformo prihodkov in pregledom odhodkov, kot že ustrezno določa medinstitucionalni sporazum
· establishment of a political link between a reform of revenue and a review of expenditure as it is already correctly included in the Interinstitutional Agreement;
Enakost med državami članicami
Equality between Member States
Preprosta predstavitev
Simplicity of presentation
Solidarnost in enako dostojanstvo držav članic
Solidarity and equal dignity between Member States
Glej prilogo k resoluciji. ;
See ANNEX to the resolution. ;
16. prepričan je, da je politična povezava med reformo prihodkov in pregledom odhodkov neizogibna in popolnoma razumljiva, zlasti dokler logika financiranja politik Skupnosti s prihodki, ki izvirajo iz nacionalnih proračunov, še vedno predstavlja vodilno načelo Unije;
Is convinced that the political link between a reform of revenue and a review of expenditure is inevitable and perfectly reasonable, especially as long as the logic of financing Community policies through revenue stemming from national budgets is still the Union’s guiding principle;
Začasnost in prehodnost sistema
Provisional and transitional character of the system
Priporočila za izboljšan sistem nacionalnih prispevkov
Recommendations for an improved system of national contributions
Predlogi komisarke Schreyer
Schreyer proposals
"Poročilo komisarke Schreyer": KOM(2004)505 in KOM(2004)501 z dne 14. julija 2004. , v skladu s katerimi:
"Schreyer report": COM(2004)505 and COM(2004)501 of 14 July 2004. according to which:
· je vsaka država članica ne glede na svoje bogastvo upravičena do rabata, ki se aktivira, ko prispevek v proračun EU doseže prag 0,35% BND;
· every Member State, regardless of its wealth, is entitled to a rebate which is triggered when its contribution to the EU budget reaches a threshold of 0,35% of GNI,
· bi bilo povračilo v obliki 66-odstotnega znižanja neto prispevka države članice;
· the refund would be in form of a 66% abatement of the Member State's net contribution, and
· je skupni najvišji znesek povračila za vse popuste omejen na 7,5 milijarde EUR letno;
· the overall maximum refund available for all rebates is capped at EUR 7,5 billion per year;
Vprašanje strukturnih in kohezijskih odhodkov
Question of structural and cohesion expenditure
24. se zaveda, da je sporazum o novem finančnem sistemu v skladu z usmeritvijo finskega predloga politično sprejemljiv le v okviru celovitega pogajalskega procesa, ki vključuje tudi odhodke; poziva Komisijo, da preuči zgoraj navedeni sistem, ki temelji na BND, ko oblikuje nove predloge o prihodkih EU po postopku pregledovanja, določenem v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2006;
Is aware of the fact that an agreement on a new financing system along the lines of the Finnish proposal is only politically acceptable within the framework of a global negotiation process which also includes expenditure; calls on the Commission to consider the GNI based system described above when making any new proposals on EU revenue following the review process as laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006;
Druga faza reforme: novi sistem virov lastnih sredstev
Second phase of the reform: a new system of own resources
· polno spoštovanje načela fiskalne suverenosti držav članic
· Full respect for the principle of fiscal sovereignty of the Member States
· fiskalna nevtralnost
· Fiscal neutrality
· nespremenjeni obseg proračuna EU
· No changes to the order of magnitude of the EU budget
· postopno uvajanje novega sistema
· Progressive phasing-in of the new system
· vzpostavitev jasne politične povezave med reformo prihodkov in reformo odhodkov
· Establishment of a clear political link between a reform of revenue and a reform of expenditure;
Polno spoštovanje fiskalne suverenosti držav članic
Full respect for the fiscal sovereignty of the Member States
30. prepričan je, če je vse ostalo nespremenjeno, da novi sistem ne sme povečati skupnih javnih odhodkov ali davčne obremenitve državljanov; sklene da, če bi novi sistem davek, ki je viden vsem državljanom, deloma ali v celoti neposredno odvajal Evropski uniji, bi bilo treba zagotoviti enakovredno zmanjšanje na nekem drugem mestu; predlaga, da se nacionalna računska sodišča in Evropsko računsko sodišče pozovejo k preverjanju in zagotavljanju spoštovanja tega načela;
Is convinced that, all other things being equal, the new system must not increase overall public expenditure nor the tax burden for citizens; concludes that, should a new system directly allocate a tax, visible for all citizens, partly or in full, to the European Union, an equivalent reduction would have to be made elsewhere; suggests that the national courts of auditors and the European Court of Auditors should be invited to check and guarantee compliance with this principle;
Nespremenjeni obseg proračuna EU
No changes to the order of magnitude of the EU budget
Postopno uvajanje novega sistema
Progressive phasing-in of the new system
Vzpostavitev jasne politične povezave med reformo prihodkov in reformo odhodkov
Establishment of a clear political link between a reform of revenue and a reform of expenditure
36. pozdravlja pobudo, ki je nastala v okviru skupnih srečanj Evropskega parlamenta in parlamentov držav članic s ciljem oblikovanja posebne delovne skupine o lastnih sredstvih; meni, da je dialog s parlamenti držav članic bistvenega pomena za doseganje napredka v zvezi z reformo virov lastnih sredstev;
Welcomes the initiative launched at the joint meetings of the European Parliament and the Member States' parliaments for the purpose of bringing together a special working party on own resources; considers dialogue with the Member States' parliaments to be essential if any progress is to be made in the reform of own resources;
Možnosti za prihodnost
Possible options for the future
39. opominja, da so najbolj pogosto omenjeni davki, ki so bili za ta namen upoštevani delno ali v celoti med potekom izmenjav z nacionalnimi parlamenti ali v poročilu Komisije o reformi sistema virov lastnih sredstev, naslednji:
Recalls that the candidate taxes in whole or in part which were taken into consideration for this purpose during the exchanges with the national parliaments or in the Commission's reports on the reform of the own resources system include the following:
· trošarine na motorna goriva za promet in drugi davki na energijo
· excise duties on motor fuel for transport and other energy taxes
· trošarine na tobak in alkohol
· excise duties on tobacco and alcohol
· davki na dobiček podjetij
· taxes on corporate profits;
· davke na poslovanje z vrednostnimi papirji
· taxes on dealings in securities
· davki na prevozne ali telekomunikacijske storitve
· taxes on transport or telecommunications services
· obdavčenje obresti pri viru
· withholding tax on interest
· dobiček ECB (dohodek od tiskanja denarja)
· ECB profits (seigniorage)
· davke na devizne transakcije
· taxes on currency transactions
· davke na prihranke
· taxes on savings
· davke na finančne transakcije (Tobinov davek);
· taxes on financial transactions (Tobin tax);
· zadostnost: Ali bi prihodki zadostovali za dolgoročno kritje odhodkov EU?
· Sufficiency: Would the revenues be sufficient to cover the expenditures of the EU in the long run?
· stabilnost: Ali bi zagotovil stabilne prihodke za proračun EU?
· Stability : Would the system bring about stable revenues for the EU budget?
· prepoznavnost in enostavnost: Ali bi bil prepoznaven in razumljiv državljanom EU?
· Visibility and simplicity: Would it be visible to EU citizens and would it be understood by them?
· nizki stroški delovanja: Ali bi bil preprost za uporabo in vključeval nizke sporazumne stroške?
· Low operating costs: Would it be simple to administer and involve low compliance costs?
· učinkovita dodelitev sredstev: Ali bi vodil do učinkovite dodelitve sredstev v EU?
· Efficient allocation of resources: Would it lead to an efficient allocation of resources in the EU?
vertikalna pravičnost: Ali bi povzročil razdelitev dohodka?
· Vertical equity: Would it involve income redistribution?
Horizontalna pravičnost: Ali bi imel enak učinek na enakovredne davkoplačevalce po vsej EU?
· Horizontal equity: Would it have an equal impact on equivalent taxpayers across the EU?
· pravični prispevki: Ali bi to sredstvo zbiralo prihodke iz držav članic v skladu z njihovo gospodarsko močjo?
· Fair contributions: Would this resource raise revenues from the Member States in line with their economic strength?
43. meni, da je ta resolucija prva, vendar trdna osnova za nadaljnja prizadevanja za pravičnejše in preglednejše sisteme financiranja Evropske unije; namerava pravočasno razpravljati in sprejeti svoje končno stališče o novem sistemu lastnih sredstev za Evropski unijo, da se bo lahko upošteval v razpravah o celovitem pregledu prihodkov in odhodkov EU, kot je bilo dogovorjeno v MIS dne 17. maja 2006;
Considers this resolution a first but solid basis on which to build further efforts to find a fairer and more transparent new system of financing the European Union; intends to discuss and adopt its final position on a new system of own resources for the European Union in time for it to be taken into account in the deliberations concerning the comprehensive review of EU revenue and expenditure as agreed in the IIA of 17 May 2006;
Sedanje poročilo na lastno pobudo o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev Evropske unije je treba obravnavati v okviru "celovitega in obsežnega pregleda vseh področij odhodkov in prihodkov EU, vključno z britanskim rabatom"; bruseljski Evropski svet v zadnjem decembru je pozval Komisijo, da opravi ta pregled, da bi lahko predstavila poročilo v letu 2008/2009.
The current own initiative report on the future of the European Union's own resources has to be seen in the context of preparing for the "full and wide-ranging review of all areas of EU expenditure and revenue, including the British rebate", which the Commission has been invited to undertake by the Brussels European Council of last December, with a view to reporting in 2008 / 2009.
Vaš poročevalec je v svojem poročilu o zadnjem predlogu glede lastnih sredstev, ki ga je Komisija predstavila na začetku leta 2006 in katerega namen je izvesti ustrezne odločitve, ki jih je sprejel bruseljski Evropski svet, že navedel, da so pomanjkljivosti trenutnega sistema lastnih sredstev bistvene.
Your rapporteur, in his report on the latest own resources proposal presented by the Commission in early 2006 aiming at implementing the relevant decisions taken by the Brussels European Council, has already stated that the flaws of the current own resources system are fundamental.
Zato poročevalec v letu 2006 niti ni poskušal spreminjati določb tega predloga Komisije, ki le povečujejo nepreglednost, zapletenost, nepravičnost in protievropskost sedanjega sistema.
This is why your rapporteur in 2006 did not even start trying to amend the provisions of that Commission proposal which just make the current system even more intransparent, complicated, unfair and anti-European.
Vsebina poročila na lastno pobudo v veliki meri temelji na srečanjih, ki jih je poročevalec imel s poslanci nacionalnih parlamentov od začetka leta 1996.
The contents of the own initiative report are very much based on the meetings your rapporteur has had with national parliamentarians since the beginning of 1996.
Medtem ko so nekateri nacionalni parlamenti izbrali, da bodo odgovorili pisno na vprašalnik o lastnih sredstvih, ki jim je bil poslan novembra 2005, so drugi raje izbrali osebnejšo izmenjavo mnenj: do sedaj je bil poročevalec povabljen v nacionalne parlamente devetih držav članic.
While some national parliaments chose to reply in writing to the questionnaire on own resources sent to them in November 2005, others preferred a more personal exchange of views: So far your rapporteur has been invited to the national parliaments of nine Member States.
Ne glede na to, ali so bila ta srečanja bolj (seje odborov) ali manj uradna (delovna kosila): na tej stopnji je treba mnenja, ki so jih ob teh priložnostih izrazili zadevni poslanci nacionalnih parlamentov, obravnavati kot osebna stališča govornikov – do sedaj še noben nacionalni parlament ali nobena nacionalna stranka ni izoblikovala formalnega stališča o vprašanju prihodnosti lastnih sredstev Unije.
Regardless of whether these meetings were of a more formal (committee meetings) or a more informal nature (working lunches): At this stage, the opinions expressed on these occasions by the interested national parliamentarians have to be considered the personal views of those taking the floor - so far, no national parliament nor any political party has yet established a formal stance on the question of the future of the Union's own resources!
Vendar ta osebna soočanja in živahne razprave, ki so se odvijali na večstranskih srečanjih (dve skupni parlamentarni srečanji v letu 2006 in dve srečanji COBU s predsedniki proračunskih odborov nacionalnih parlamentov v letih 2005 in 2006) so domnevno poročevalcu omogočili, da oblikuje prve sklepe o tem, kaj je treba narediti, kaj se ne sme in kaj bi lahko naredili v zvezi s kakršnokoli prihodnjo reformo prihodkov EU.
Nevertheless, these personal encounters and the lively discussions taking place at the multilateral meetings (two joint parliamentary meetings in 2006 and the two COBU meetings with the chairs of the national parliaments' budgets committees in 2005 and 2006) have seemed to allow your rapporteur to draw some first conclusions on the do's, the don'ts and the maybe's in connection with any future reform of EU revenue.
Nekatere možne točke soglasja so začele nastajati počasi, a zanesljivo, kot na primer splošno zavračanje zamisli o pravem novem evropskem davku ali prenosu kakršnekoli pristojnosti obdavčevanja na evropsko raven.
Some first possible points of consensus have slowly but surely started to arise, like for example a general rejection of the idea of a genuine new European tax or of a transfer of any power of taxation to the European level.
Na drugi strani, je bila velika večina tistih nacionalnih kolegov, ki so izrazili svoje mnenje, bilo docela odprtih za razpravo o možnosti uporabe dela obstoječega davka za financiranje Evropske unije; prosto so celo premišljali o "primernih" davkih…
On the other hand, a vast majority of those national colleagues who expressed themselves were quite open to discuss the possibility of using a part of an existing tax to finance the European Union, even freely pondering on "suitable" candidate taxes ...
Še vedno je treba veliko postoriti, da bi prišli do končne odločitve, katera možnost bi najbolje izpolnila potrebo po novem, resnično evropskem sistemu lastnih sredstev, ki je pravičen, preprost in pregleden.
A lot of work still needs to be done in order to arrive at a final decision on which option would best serve the need for a new, truly European, own resources system, that is equitable, simple and transparent.
Poročevalec upa, da bo v letu 2007 lahko vzpostavljen skupni dosje v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti, možna podlaga za prihodnje odločitve, ki jih je treba sprejeti, da izkoristimo priložnosti prihodnjega postopka pregledovanja.
Your rapporteur hopes that in the course of 2007 a common dossier can be established in close cooperation with the national parliaments that could be the basis for the future decisions that need to be taken in order to seize the opportunities of the coming review process.
4 O PRIHODNOSTI LASTNIH SREDSTEV EVROPSKE UNIJE
4 ON THE FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION'S OWN RESOURCES
Zahteve Parlamenta ...
Parliament’s demands …
V mnenju
In its opinion
... in odgovor Sveta
… and Council’s response
S sklepom Sveta
The Council decision
Sklep Sveta 2000/597. , ki je bil dokončno sprejet 29. septembra 2000 in ki je začel veljati 1. marca 2002, še zdaleč niso bile izpolnjene naslednje zahteve: kodificiral je britanski popust in prilagoditev deležev pri financiranju popusta Avstrije, Nemčije, Nizozemske in Švedske – namesto da bi načrtovali postopno opuščanje britanskega popusta, je bil ta mehanizem razširjen na ostale države članice.
Council Decision 2000/597. that was finally adopted on 29 September 2000, entering into force on 1 March 2002, did anything but fulfil these demands: It has codified the UK rebate as well as the adjustments of the financing shares for the rebate of Austria, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden - instead of planning for a phasing-out of the UK rebate a similar mechanism was extended to other Member States.
S povečevanjem deleža tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev, ki jih države članice lahko zadržijo kot nadomestilo za stroške zbiranja, z 10 % na 25 % se je del prihodkov Unije iz tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev še dodatno znižal.
By raising the share of traditional own resources that can be retained by the Member States to compensate for their collection costs from 10% to 25%, the “traditional own resources”-part of EU revenue was further reduced.
Vendar je kljub vsem tem dogovorom, ki jih Parlament ni odobraval, sklep Sveta vseboval nekatere priložnosti za "boljšo " prihodnost v obliki podrobne revizijske klavzule.
However, despite all these arrangements that were not welcomed by Parliament, the Council decision also contained some chances for a "better" future in form of a detailed revision clause.
Predlog komisarke Schreyerjeve iz leta 2004
The “Schreyer proposals” of 2004
Julija 2004 je Komisija v skladu s členom 9 sklepa Sveta predstavila poročilo o delovanju sistema lastnih sredstev
In July 2004, in accordance with Article 9 of the Council decision, the Commission presented its Report on the operation of the own resources system
( KOM(2004)0505 ). in predloge za nov sklep o sistemu lastnih sredstev ter izvajanje uredbe o popravku proračunskih neravnovesij
( COM(2004)0505 ). as well as proposals for a new decision on the system of own resources and for an implementing regulation for the correction of budgetary imbalances
V poročilu je Komisija predlagala, naj Svet razmisli o uvedbi novega sistema financiranja EU do leta 2014, osnovanem na glavnem fiskalnem viru, ki temelji na energiji, DDV ali davku na dobiček podjetij.
In its report, the Commission proposed that the Council reflect on the introduction by 2014 of a new funding system for the EU, centred around a main fiscal resource based on either energy, VAT or corporate income tax.
Kot lastna sredstva na osnovi davka so bile predlagane tri glavne možnosti, in sicer delež:
Three main candidates as a tax based own resource were listed, namely a share of:
· nacionalne stopnje DDV, ki bi financiranje EU naredila razumljivejše za državljane
· the national VAT rate, making the financing of the EU more understandable to citizens
Ta možnost bi zahtevala največ časa za izvedbo, saj bi zaradi načela doseganja usklajenosti davčne osnove bilo treba skleniti politični sporazum, še preden se določi najnižja stopnja.
This alternative would take longest to implement since a political agreement would be needed on the principle of achieving harmonization of the tax base, before setting a minimum rate. .
Sistem, ki v celoti temelji na davkih, na tej stopnji integracije EU ni bil obravnavan kot realističen, zato ga Komisija ni predlagala.
A fully tax-based system was not considered realistic at this stage of EU integration and not proposed by the Commission.
Ta splošni mehanizem popravkov bi uporabili, če bi neto prispevki presegli 0,35 % BDP vsake države.
This general correction mechanism would be triggered if net contributions exceeded 0.35% of each country’s GNI.
Količina skupnih vračil bi bila omejena na največ 7,5 milijarde EUR na leto.
The total refund volume would be limited to a maximum of EUR 7.5 billion a year.
Poročevalec je menil, da so predlogi Komisije zelo zanimivi in vredni resnega premisleka.
Your rapporteur thought the Commission’s ideas very interesting and worth serious reflection.
Vendar se zdi, da jih države članice niso več pripravljene upoštevati, nova Komisija, imenovana leta 2005, pa si za napredek ni močno prizadevala.
However, the Member States seemed not willing to pursue them and the new Commission, instituted in 2005, made no serious effort for progress.
Tako stanje je predvsem posledica trenutnih pogajanj za novi večletni finančni okvir in dejstva, da odhodkov in prihodkov EU ne moremo obravnavati ločeno.
Of course, this standstill was mainly due to the ongoing negotiations for the new multiannual financial framework and to the fact that EU expenditure and revenue could not be considered isolated from each other.
Na zasedanju Evropskega sveta decembra 2005 so se države članice le dogovorile glede nove finančne perspektive za obdobje 2007–2013, pri čemer je sporazum o odhodkih postal možen šele tako, da so ugodili zahtevam marsikatere države članice na prihodkovni strani.
At the Brussels European Council in December 2005, Member States could finally agree on a new financial perspective for 2007 – 2013, an agreement on expenditure that had only become possible by granting far-reaching concessions for this, that and the other Member State on the revenue side.
"Reforma", ki jo je predlagal Evropski svet v Bruslju leta 2005
The “reform” proposed by the Brussels European Council 2005
Financiranje proračuna Evropske unije zato s predlogom Komisije iz leta 2006, namenjenim izvajanju sklepov Evropskega sveta, ni nič bolj, ampak celo manj pregledno, tako da niti spoštovanja načela pravičnosti ni mogoče presoditi brez težav.
In consequence, the Commission proposal of 2006 aiming at implementing the results of the European Council’s conclusions makes the financing of the European Union's budget certainly not more, but less, transparent, so that not even the adherence to the principle of equity can be judged easily.
Zahteve za nov sistem, kot jih je v stališču leta 1999 sprejel Evropski parlament, ponovno niso izpolnjene.
The requirements for a new system as adopted by the European Parliament in its position of 1999 again are certainly not met.
Po tem predlogu bodo nekatere države članice v obdobju 2007–2013 upravičene do znižanega deleža za prevzete obveznosti iz sredstev DDV ali bruto znižanja letnih prispevkov iz BND.
According to this proposal, some Member States were to benefit, between 2007-2013, from reduced rates of call of VAT or from gross reductions in their annual GNI contributions.
Ta bruto znižanja bi financirale vse države članice, vključno z obema upravičenkama.
These gross reductions would be financed by all Member States, including the two beneficiaries themselves.
Predlog načelno ne spreminja popravka Združenega kraljestva, "britanskega popusta", razen glede odhodkov v novih državah članicah (ki bodo izključeni iz celotnih dodeljenih odhodkov za izračun popravka za Združeno kraljestvo).
The proposal, in principle, leaves the UK correction, the "British rebate", intact except for expenditure in the new Member States (which will be excluded from total allocated expenditure for the purpose of calculating the UK correction).
Vendar bodo tržni odhodki SKP v novih državah članicah iz te izjeme izključeni, torej ne morejo biti del celote skupnih razporejenih odhodkov, ki se uporablja za izračun britanskega popusta.
However, CAP market expenditure in the new Member States shall be excluded from this exception, i.e. be part of the total allocated expenditure that is used for calculating the UK rebate.
Mnenje Parlamenta – poročilo Lamassure za leto 2006
Parliament's opinion - Lamassoure report 2006