natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ne glede na to bi takšno odstopanje ustvarilo vrzel, ki bi jo v prihodnje neusmiljeno izkoriščali vsi trgovci s pošiljkami krzna mačk in psov, zaradi česar bi uredba postala popolnoma neuporabna.
In any case, such a derogation would provide a gaping loophole which would be ruthlessly exploited by traders of all future consignments of cat and dog fur, thus rendering the entire Regulation useless.
Zlasti države članice, ki pri izvajanju te uredbe zasežejo pošiljke krzna mačk in psov, sprejmejo zakonodajo, ki jim omogoča, da zadevnemu trgovcu zaplenijo in uničijo takšno pošiljko ter mu začasno ali trajno odvzamejo dovoljenje za uvoz/izvoz.
In particular, Member States which seize consignments of cat and dog fur following the implementation of this Regulation shall adopt laws enabling them to confiscate and destroy such consignments and to suspend or revoke the import/export licences granted to the traders concerned.
Države članice Komisijo najpozneje do [dd/mm/yyyy] uradno obvestijo o teh določbah, prav tako jo nemudoma uradno obvestijo o vseh poznejših spremembah, ki vplivajo na te določbe.
The Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by (dd/mm/yyyy) at the latest, and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
Evropski parlament in Svet ne želita posegati v zakonodajni postopek, ki zadeva izvajanje te uredbe na ravni držav članic, vendar bi zaseganje in uničevanje pošiljk s krznom mačk in psov, ki kršijo uredbo in vstopajo na ozemlje Skupnosti, ter odvzem dovoljenja za uvoz/izvoz koristno vplivali na trgovce, ki bi poskušali kršiti zakon.
While the European Parliament and Council do not seek to interfere in the legislative processes of the Member States insofar as the implementation of this Regulation is concerned, nevertheless the practice inter alia of confiscating and destroying consignments of cat and dog fur seeking to enter the Community in breach of the Regulation, together with the suspension or revocation of import/export licences, would have a salutary impact on any traders attempting to break the law.
Po vsej Evropi je veliko ljudi včlanjenih v organizacije za dobro počutje živali, komisar Kyprianou pa je medskupini Parlamenta za dobro počutje živali junija leta 2005 povedal:
Across Europe many people are members of animal welfare organisations, whilst, as Commissioner Kyprianou told the Parliament’s animal welfare intergroup in June 2005:
„O tem čustvenem vprašanju [krzno mačk in psov] sem prejel veliko pisem politikov in državljanov, ki izražajo globoko ogorčenost in odpor do te trgovine.
“I have received a massive number of letters on this emotive subject [cat and dog fur], from politicians as well as from citizens, expressing deep indignation and repulsion regarding this trade.
Takšne občutke so povzročili grozljivi posnetki ravnanja z mačkami in psi, ki jih izkoriščajo za proizvodnjo krzna v Aziji.“
These feelings were provoked by horror scenes of how cats and dogs exploited for fur production, are treated in Asia.”
Na ravni Evropske unije je bil pomen boljše zaščite in spoštovanja dobrega počutja živali kot čutečih bitij priznan s podpisom pogodbe iz Amsterdama ter sprejetjem protokola, ki je pozval, da se dobro počutje živali celovito upošteva pri oblikovanju in izvajanju politik Skupnosti na področju notranjega trga (med drugimi).
At the European Union level, the importance of improved protection and respect for the welfare of animals as sentient beings has been recognised since the conclusion of the Amsterdam Treaty and the adoption of a protocol calling for animal welfare to be taken fully into account in formulating and implementing the Community’s internal market policies (amongst others).
Konkretni koraki za izboljšanje dobrega počutja živali na evropski ravni bi prispevali k zmanjšanju vrzeli med evropskimi institucijami in državljani.
Concrete steps, taken at the European level, to enhance animal welfare would help to reduce the gap between Europe’s Institutions and its citizens.
Komisija je seznanjena s splošno in naraščajočo zaskrbljenostjo javnosti v zvezi s tem, da bi evropski državljani lahko nevede kupovali krzno mačk in psov ali izdelke iz njega.
As the Commission acknowledges, there is wide-spread and growing public concern amongst European citizens about the possibility that they could unknowingly buy fur or fur products made from cats and dogs.
Ta zaskrbljenost je bila izražena v pisni izjavi, ki jo je Parlament s široko podporo sprejel 18. decembra 2003, v mnenju Odbora za mednarodno trgovino o zaščiti in dobrem počutju živali 2006–2010 ter v resoluciji, sprejeti na plenarnem zasedanju 12. oktobra 2006 – vsi trije dokumenti pozivajo k prepovedi trgovine s krznom mačk in psov.
This concern was reflected in the written declaration the Parliament adopted with widespread support on 18 December 2003, the INTA opinion on the protection and welfare of animals 2006-2010 and the resolution adopted by the Plenary on 12 October 2006, all of which called for a ban on trade in cat and dog fur.
Zato je ta predlog uredbe dobrodošel korak, za katerega je treba čestitati Komisiji in zlasti komisarju Kyprianouju.
This proposed Regulation is therefore a welcome step for which the Commission, and in particular Commissioner Kyprianou, should be congratulated.
Žal je treba čestitkam dodati obžalovanje, da se je priprava tega zakonodajnega predloga tako zavlekla.
At the same time, these congratulations must be tempered with regret at the time it has taken for the production of this legislative proposal.
Pripravljavka mnenja je 12. aprila 2002 napisala pismo takratnemu komisarju Byrnu in pozvala k uvedbi tovrstne prepovedi, vendar je prejela odgovor, da Komisija „preučuje to zapleteno vprašanje“.
The draftsperson of this opinion wrote to then Commissioner Byrne on 12 April 2002 calling for such a ban but was told the Commission was “reflecting” on what was “a complex issue”.
Iz te izkušnje bi se morali nekaj naučiti in zagotoviti, da se bo Komisija pripravljena hitreje in odločneje odzivati na podobna vprašanja, kot je na primer trgovina s proizvodi iz tjulnjev.
We should learn from this experience and ensure that the Commission is ready to act more quickly and decisively in response to similar issues, such as the trade in seal products.
V tem osnutku mnenja sta zato predlagani dve vrsti sprememb.
For this reason, the present draft opinion proposes two types of amendment.
Namen prvega niza je odprava nekaterih vrzeli v predlogu Komisije, in sicer:
One set seeks to close off certain loopholes in the Commission’s proposals, in particular by:
· jasno naj bi opredelil, da izraz „krzno“ pomeni kožuh, kožo in dlako živali;
· making clear that the term “fur” should cover the pelt, skin and hair of the animal;
· zagotovil naj bi, da se uredba ne bo nanašala le na domačo mačko, temveč tudi na križance med domačo in divjo mačko;
· ensuring that the regulation covers not only the domestic cat but also animals produced as the result of interbreeding between domestic and wild cats;
· preprečil naj bi, da se s postopkom komitologije uvedejo izjeme, ki bi omogočile trženje ter uvoz krzna mačk in psov, rejenih za druge namene.
· removing the possibility of allowing, by comitology, derogations which would allow the marketing and import of fur from cats and dogs that had been bred for some other purpose.
Namen preostalih predlogov sprememb v istem nizu je krepitev sistema za izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami in Komisijo, da se spodbudi razširjanje najboljšega ravnanja.
Other amendments in this set seek to strengthen the system of information exchange between Member States and the Commission so as to assist the spread of best practice.
V skladu s prizadevanji za boljše predpise se predlaga uvedba rednega poročanja Parlamentu in Svetu, da bo mogoče vpliv zakonodaje učinkoviteje oceniti.
The introduction of regular reports to Parliament and the Council is proposed so as to assist effective evaluation of the legislation’s effects, in line with the objectives of “Better Regulation”.
Namen drugega niza predlogov sprememb je opozoriti, da so evropski državljani prav tako zaskrbljeni glede tega, da se v Evropski uniji tržijo izdelki iz tjulnjev.
A second set of amendments is designed to recognise that European citizens are equally concerned about the possibility of discovering that products made from seals are being marketed in the European Union.
500.000 Italijanov je leta 2005 podpisalo peticijo za prepoved krzna tjulnjev na nacionalni ravni.
500 000 Italians signed a petition calling for a national ban on seal fur in 2005.
Resolucija o zaščiti in dobrem počutju živali 2006–2010 ter pisna izjava o prepovedi izdelkov iz tjulnjev v Evropski uniji, sprejeta 26. decembra 2006, pozivata k popolni prepovedi uvoza izdelkov iz teh živali.
A total import ban on seal products was called for both by the resolution on the protection and welfare of animals 2006-2010 and by the written declaration on banning seal products in the European Union adopted on 26 September 2006.
Parlament je resolucijo o trgovini z izdelki iz tjulnjev sprejel že 11. marca 1982.
Indeed Parliamentary resolutions on the trade in seal products date back at least to 11 March 1982.
Italija je leta 2005 uvedla začasno prepoved proizvodov iz tjulnjev, medtem ko je belgijski parlament leta 2006 sprejel stalno prepoved.
In 2005 Italy introduced a temporary ban on products derived from seals whilst in January 2007 the Belgian Parliament adopted a permanent ban.
Nizozemska bo verjetno v bližnji prihodnosti prepovedala te izdelke, druge države pa o tovrstni zakonodaji razmišljajo.
The Netherlands is likely to legislate against these products in the near future whilst other countries are considering legislation of this sort.
Nekatere druge države imajo sisteme za podeljevanje dovoljenj, ki učinkovito omejujejo uvoz.
Other Member States have licensing systems that effectively limit imports.
Takšna zakonodaja je v skladu s pravili Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, saj sodi med izjeme iz člena XX sporazuma GATT ter enako obravnava domače in tuje blago.
Such legislation is WTO compatible because it is covered by the exceptions provided for under GATT Article XX and is non discriminatory between domestic and foreign goods.
Zunaj EU je trgovina z izdelki iz morskih sesalcev prepovedana v Avstraliji, Mehiki, Novi Zelandiji in ZDA.
Outside the EU, Australia, Mexico, New Zealand and the United States prohibit trade in products derived from marine mammals.
V nobenem od teh primerov ni bil sprožen postopek za reševanje sporov.
None of these bans has been challenged using the dispute settlement procedure.
Iz obstoječe zakonodaje in zakonodaje v pripravi je razvidno, da evropski državljani in njihovi izvoljeni predstavniki menijo, da trgovina z izdelki iz tjulnjev ni nič bolj sprejemljiva od trgovine s krznom mačk in psov.
In view of this existing and pending legislation it is clear that European citizens and their elected representatives regard the trade in seal products as no more acceptable than that in cat and dog furs.
Prav tako se trgovci soočajo z različnimi pravnimi zahtevami v različnih državah članicah, kjer hočejo poslovati.
Equally, traders are faced with different legal requirements in the different Member States where they wish to do business.
Ker se je ravno zaradi takšnih razmer Komisija odločila predlagati prepoved trženja krzna mačk in psov, ni jasno, zakaj ni predlagala tudi prepovedi trženja izdelkov iz tjulnjev.
As this situation is precisely the basis the Commission has chosen to adopt for its proposed ban on the marketing of cat and dog fur, it is unclear why it has not also proposed a ban on the marketing of seal products.
Namen predlogov sprememb je, da se Komisiji zagotovijo zadostne informacije o stanju na zakonodajnem področju v državah članicah, da lahko ponovno preuči možnosti za ukrepanje proti proizvodom iz tjulnjev.
The suggested amendments are intended to provide the Commission with the necessary information on the legislative situation in the Member States so that it can review the need to act against seal products.
Upajmo, da za to ne bo potreben tako dolg in razvlečen postopek, kot je bil pri pripravi dobrodošlega, vendar zapoznelega predloga za prepoved trgovanja s krznom mačk in psov.
We must hope that this will not require such a long, drawn out process as the welcome, but overdue, proposal to ban trade in cat and dog fur.
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija
Text Proposed by the Commission
(2a) Države članice prav tako vse pogosteje sprejemajo zakonodajo, ki prepoveduje proizvodnjo in trženje izdelkov iz tjulnjev.
(2a) Member States are also increasingly adopting legislation designed to prohibit the production and marketing of products made from seals.
Italija je leta 2005 začasno prepovedala izdelke iz tjulnjev, belgijski parlament pa je januarja 2007 sprejel trajno prepoved.
introduced a temporary ban on products derived from seals in 2005 and the Belgian Parliament approved a permanent ban in January 2007.
Na Nizozemskem bodo sprejeli predpise s tega področja v naslednjih mesecih, medtem ko druge države članice uporabljajo sisteme izdajanja dovoljenj ali razmišljajo o njihovi uporabi.
The Netherlands is expected to legislate on this topic in the coming months while other Member States are operating or considering licensing systems.
Posledica tega je, da razhajanja na zakonodajnem področju, ki jih je Komisija ugotovila glede krzna mačk in psov, obstajajo tudi v zvezi s tjulnjevo kožo in izdelki iz tjulnjev.
As a result, the legislative divergence the Commission has identified with regard to cat and dog fur also exists for sealskins and products derived from seals.
(2b) Po vsej verjetnosti bodo proizvodnjo in trženje tjulnjevih kož in drugih proizvodov iz tjulnjev kmalu prepovedale še druge države članice, čeprav se zavedajo, da bi bila zakonodaja na evropski ravni učinkovitejša.
(2b) It is likely that further national bans on the production and marketing of seal skins and other products made from seals will be introduced in the near future despite the fact that Member States recognise that legislation at the European level would be more effective.
Februarja 2007 je britanski minister za trgovino Evropsko komisijo pozval, naj v celotni EU prepove uvoz proizvodov iz tjulnjev, nemški zvezni minister za prehrano, kmetijstvo in varstvo potrošnikov pa je napovedal, da bo Nemčija spremenila nacionalne zakone o zaščiti živali, tako da bodo prepovedovali proizvode iz tjulnjev, saj se Komisija ni odzvala na številne pozive, naj kaj ukrene.
In February 2007, the British Minister for Trade called on the European Commission to propose an EU-wide ban on the import of seal products while the German Federal Minister for Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection announced that, in view of the Commission’s failure to respond to the many calls for action, national animal protection legislation would be amended so as to prohibit products made from seals.
Predlog spremembe
Amendment 36 Recital 6
(6) Poleg tega so evropski potrošniki prenehali kupovati v drugih državah članicah in morda ne razumejo povsem razlik med veljavnimi nacionalnimi zakonodajami .
(6) Moreover, European consumers are discouraged from buying in other Member States and may not fully grasp the differentiations in the applicable legal situation of each Member State .
(6a) Zaupanja potrošnikov ne bo mogoče doseči samo s prepovedjo trženja krzna mačk in psov, temveč jih bo treba prepričati, da so cariniki sposobni takšno krzno brez težav prepoznati.
(6a) Consumer confidence requires not only that the marketing of cat and dog fur be banned but that citizens be assured that customs officials are able to identify such fur without excessive difficulty.
Zato bi morala prepoved veljati za vse vrste, katerih krzno je podobno krznu domače mačke ali psa, na primer tudi za divje mačke in rakunje pse.
For this reason, it is appropriate for the ban to cover species whose fur could be confused with that coming from domestic cats or dogs, such as wild cats or raccoon dogs.
Izkušnje v Združenih državah in drugod kažejo, da mora prepoved trgovanja s krznom mačk in psov veljati tudi za sorodne vrste, katerih kožuha ni mogoče povsem razlikovati od kožuha domačih vrst ( Felis catus in Canis familiaris ).
Experience in the United States and elsewhere shows that, to be effective, a ban on cat and dog fur should cover not only the domestic species ( felis catus and canis familiaris ) but other related species whose furs cannot readily be distinguished from these species.
Predlog spremembe
Amendment 38 Recital 7
(7) Ukrepi, določeni s to uredbo, morajo zato preprečiti, da bi potrošniki ponevedoma kupili proizvode iz mačjega ali pasjega krzna.
(7) The measures provided for in this Regulation should protect consumers from unknowingly purchasing products made with cat and dog fur.
Povečali bodo tudi zaupanje potrošnikov v učinkovito delovanje notranjega trga .
The measure will raise consumer confidence in the effective functioning of the internal market.
(8a) Prav tako obstaja možnost, da bo sprejeta nacionalna zakonodaja, ki bo vplivala na notranji trg izdelkov iz drugih vrst, zlasti tjulnjev.
(8a) There is a similar possibility of national legislation affecting the internal market for products from other species, most notably seals.
Zato bi morala Komisija zbirati informacije o nacionalni zakonodaji ter redno poročati Parlamentu in Svetu, da se tovrsten razvoj dogodkov obravnava že v zgodnji fazi in se sprejmejo ustrezni ukrepi.
The Commission should therefore collect information on national legislation and report regularly to the Parliament and Council so that such developments can be identified at an early stage and appropriate action taken.
(9a) S prepovedjo prodaje krzna mačk in psov ter proizvodov, ki takšno krzno vsebujejo, ne glede na njihov izvor, bi zagotovili enake pogoje za proizvajalce takšnih proizvodov iz EU in tretjih držav.
(9a) A ban on the placing on the market of cat and dog fur and products containing such fur, regardless of their source, would avoid discrimination between EU and third country manufacturers and amongst third country manufacturers of such products.
Prepoved bi bila tako v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi EU.
The ban would thus be in line with the EU's international obligations.
Uvodna izjava 12
Amendment 43 Recital 12
Da bo uredba učinkovita, ne sme dopuščati izjem, kakršne je predlagala Komisija – na primer uvoza krzna mačk in psov, ki so bili ubiti zaradi mesa ali za osebno uporabo.
Effective enforcement of the Regulation mean that derogations such as those proposed by the Commission - which would allow the import of fur from cats and dogs that were killed for their meat or for personal use - should not be considered.
Takšne izjeme so zakonodajna vrzel, ki lahko spodkoplje celotno uredbo.
Such derogations would provide a loophole which would undermine the entire Regulation.
„mačka“ pomeni žival vrste felis catus;
‘cat’ shall mean an animal of the species felis catus;
„mačka“ pomeni žival vrste Felis catus ali katerekoli vrste oziroma podvrste podrodu Felis silvestris ;
– ‘cat’ shall mean an animal of the species felis catus or any species or sub-species of the sub-genus felis silvestris;
Čeprav je domača mačka (Felis silvestris catus ali Felis catus, odvisno od klasifikacijskega sistema, ki se uporablja) najbolj razširjena vrsta in se z njo verjetno največ trguje, v evropskih regijah in drugod po svetu živijo tudi mačke podobnih vrst.
Although the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus or Felis catus depending on the classification system being used) is the most common species and most likely to be the subject of trade, cats from look-alike species are widespread in regions of Europe and the rest of the world.
– „pes“ pomeni žival vrste canis familiaris.
- ‘dog’ shall mean an animal of the species canis familiaris.
– „pes“ pomeni žival vrste Canis familiaris ali vrste Nyctereutes procyonoides (splošno poimenovan rakunji pes) .
- ‘dog’ shall mean an animal of the species canis familiaris or the species Nyctereutes procyonoides (commonly known as raccoon dog) ;
Izkušnje v ZDA, ki so že leta 2000 prepovedale uvoz krzna mačk in psov, kažejo, da mora zakonodaja zajemati tudi druge vrste iz družine psov, še zlasti rakunje pse, da bodo lahko carinski organi prepovedano krzno zlahka prepoznali.
Experience of the US legislation, which has banned the import of cat and dog fur since the year 2000, shows that, to allow prohibited furs to be readily identified by customs, it is necessary to cover other species of the dog family and, in particular, raccoon dogs.
Po podatkih ameriške organizacije za humano ravnanje z živalmi Humane Society of the United States so številni krzneni jopiči ali jopiči, obrobljeni s krznom, ki so na ameriškem trgu naprodaj kot umetno krzno oziroma sploh nimajo nobene oznake, dejansko v celoti ali delno izdelani iz pasjega krzna.
According to the Humane Society of the United States, many fur or fur-trimmed jackets sold in the United States as having "faux fur" -- or not labelled at all -- are actually made, at least in part, from dog fur.
Preizkusi so pokazali, da gre v številnih primerih za krzno rakunjih psov.
In many cases, tests have shown the fur came from raccoon dogs.
- „krzno“ vključuje tudi kožuh, kožo ali katerikoli drug del živali iz tega člena, iz katerega je mogoče pridobiti krzno;
- 'fur' shall also include the pelt, skin or any other part of the animals referred to in this article from which fur could be obtained;
Ta predlog spremembe naj bi odpravil morebitne zakonodajne vrzeli.
This amendment seeks to close potential loopholes .
- „dajanje v promet“ pomeni posest krzna iz vrst iz člena 1 ali proizvoda, ki vsebuje takšno krzno, za namene prodaje, vključno s ponujanjem za prodajo in druge oblike prenosa, tako brezplačne kot za plačilo, ter prodajo, distribucijo in druge oblike prenosa;
- 'placing on the market' shall mean the holding of fur from species referred to in Article 1 or a product containing such fur for the purpose of sale, including offering for sale or any other form of transfer, whether free of charge or not, and the sale, distribution and other forms of transfer themselves;
- „osebni ali gospodinjski predmeti“ pomenijo mrtve živali vrst Felis catus in Canis familiaris, vključno z nagačenimi, ter njihove dele ali izdelke iz njih, ki so osebna last posameznika ter so ali bodo postali del njegovega običajnega premičnega premoženja;
- 'personal or household effects' shall mean dead animals of the species felis catus and canis familiaris, including those preserved through taxidermy, or parts and derivatives thereof, that belong to a private individual and that form or are intended to form, part of his normal goods and chattels;
Ta predlog spremembe pojasnjuje in omejuje morebitno izjemo, ki bi jo lahko uvedli s postopkom komitologije (novi regulativni postopek s pregledom).
This amendment seeks to clarify and limit the potential exception that could be introduced through comitology (the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny).
Komisija do [30. marca 2012] in nato vsaki dve leti poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o delovanju te uredbe.
The Commission shall report to the Parliament and the Council by [30 March 2012] and every second year thereafter on the operation of this Regulation.
Tovrstna redna poročila bodo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu omogočila, da pregledata učinkovitost uredbe in poskrbita za njeno uspešno izvajanje.
Such regular reports will enable the European Parliament and Council to review the effectiveness of the Regulation and provide an incentive for effective enforcement.
Člen 3 b (novo), naslov
Article 3 b (new), title
Vsebina dveletnih poročil
Content of biennial reports
Ta niz predlogov sprememb opredeljuje, katere informacije naj bi vsebovala poročila iz prejšnjega predloga spremembe (člen 3a).
This series of amendments sets out the information that should be included in the reports proposed in the previous amendment (Article 3a).
Tako bosta Parlament in Svet prejela dovolj informacij, da bosta lahko ocenila učinkovitost zakonodaje.
This will ensure that the Parliament and Council receive sufficient information to be able to evaluate the effectiveness of the legislation.
Člen 3 b (novo), uvodni del
Article 3 b (new), introductory part