natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Preventiva je pri podzemni vodi posebno pomembna, ker njeno čiščenje – če je sploh izvedljivo – predstavlja zelo drag in dolgotrajen postopek.
Prevention is particularly important because the purification of groundwater - if feasible at all - is a very costly and time-consuming process.
(1) Podzemna voda je dragocen naravni vir, ki bi se moral zavarovati pred kemičnim onesnaževanjem.
(1) Groundwater is a valuable natural resource which should be protected from chemical pollution.
To je še zlasti pomembno pri ekosistemih, ki so odvisni od podzemne vode, ter pri uporabi podzemne vode za oskrbo z vodo, namenjeno prehrani ljudi.
This is particularly important for groundwater-dependent ecosystems and for the use of groundwater in water supply for human consumption.
(1) Podzemna voda je dragocen naravni vir, ki ga je treba kot takega zavarovati pred poslabšanjem in kemičnim onesnaževanjem.
(1) Groundwater is a valuable natural resource and as such must be protected from deterioration and chemical pollution.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 2 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 2 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Te dodatne spremembe so še posebno pomembne, ker so telesa podzemne vode samostojni ekosistemi in jih je treba kot take zaščititi.
These additional changes are particularly important because bodies of groundwater are independent ecosystems and must be protected as such .
To je treba vsaj enkrat jasno izraziti.
This must be clearly stated at least once.
(1a) Podzemna voda je najobčutljivejše in največje nahajališče sladke vode v Evropski uniji, predvsem pa je glavni vir javne oskrbe s pitno vodo.
(1a) Groundwater is the most sensitive and the largest body of freshwater in the European Union and in particular also the primary source of public drinking water supplies.
Raven varstva pred novimi odvajanji, emisijami in uhajanji mora biti primerljiva vsaj z ravnjo za površinske vode v dobrem kemijskem stanju.
The level of protection against new discharges, emissions and losses must be at least comparable to that for surface water of good chemical status.
Onesnaženje ali poslabšanje pogosto povzroči nepopravljivo škodo.
Pollution or deterioration frequently gives rise to irreversible damage.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 4 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 4 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Kakršni koli postopki prečiščevanja, ki se izvajajo, so namenjeni zgolj preprečevanju korozije z odstranjevanjem železa in mangana ali izboljšanju videza/okusa vode in ne čiščenju.
Any treatment processes which are carried out are merely intended to prevent corrosion, by removing iron and manganese, or to improve the appearance/taste of the water; they do not involve purification.
(1b) Podzemno vodo je treba zaščititi tako, da je možno doseči kakovost pitne vode z enostavnim čiščenjem, kot je določeno v ciljih iz člena 7(2) Direktive 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike 1 .
(1b) Groundwater must be protected in such a way that good quality drinking water can be achieved by simple purification, as specified in the objectives set out in Article 7(2) and (3) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy 1 .
1 UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str.
1 OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo št. 2455/2001/ES (UL L 331, 15.12.2001, str.
Directive amended by Decision No 2455/2001/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2001, p.
Znova se vstavi uvodna izjava 2 iz besedila, ki ga je Evropski parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of Recital 2 in the text adopted by the European Parliament at first reading.
(3) Za varstvo okolja kot celote in zlasti zdravja ljudi se je treba visokim koncentracijam zdravju škodljivih onesnaževal v podzemni vodi izogniti, jih preprečiti ali zmanjšati.
(3) In order to protect the environment as a whole, and human health in particular, detrimental concentrations of harmful pollutants in groundwater should be avoided, prevented or reduced.
(3) Za varstvo okolja kot celote in zlasti zdravja ljudi se je visokim koncentracijam zdravju škodljivih onesnaževal v podzemni vodi nujno treba izogniti, jih preprečiti ali zmanjšati.
(3) In order to protect the environment as a whole, and human health in particular, detrimental concentrations of harmful pollutants in groundwater must be avoided, prevented or reduced.
(6a) Varstvo podzemne vode lahko na nekaterih območjih zahteva spremembo kmetijske in gozdarske prakse, kar bi lahko povzročilo izgubo dohodka.
(6a) The protection of groundwater may in some areas require a change in farming or forestry practices, which could entail a loss of income.
Ta vidik je treba obravnavati pri pripravi načrtov za razvoj podeželja v okviru preoblikovane skupne kmetijske politike.
This issue should be addressed when the rural development plans under the reformed common agricultural policy are drawn up.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 8 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 8 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Zavezujoči standardi kakovosti podzemne vode so v Prilogi I določeni le za nitrate in pesticide.
Annex I lays down binding groundwater quality standards only in respect of nitrates and pesticides.
Te snovi se izločajo predvsem pri kmetijskih dejavnostih.
These substances are chiefly released as a result of farming practices.
Kako težak, drag in dolgotrajen je postopek zmanjševanja tovrstnega onesnaževanja, kažejo poročila o izvajanju direktive o nitratih.
The reports on the implementation of the nitrates directive show just how difficult, costly and time-consuming the process of reducing such pollution is.
Pomoč Skupnosti je zato treba predvideti v okviru SKP.
Community aid must therefore be provided under the CAP.
(13) V določenih okoliščinah bi moralo biti državam članicam dovoljeno, da odobrijo izjeme od ukrepov za preprečevanje ali omejevanje vnosa onesnaževal v podzemno vodo.
(13) In certain circumstances, Member States should be authorised to grant exemptions from measures to prevent or limit the input of pollutants into groundwater.
(13) Države članice, ki v določenih okoliščinah odobrijo izjeme od ukrepov za preprečevanje ali omejevanje vnosa onesnaževal v podzemno vodo , morajo to storiti na podlagi primernih, jasnih in preglednih meril, izjeme pa utemeljiti v načrtih upravljanja povodij .
(13) Member States which in certain circumstances grant exemptions from measures to prevent or limit the input of pollutants into groundwater should do so on the basis of appropriate, evident and transparent criteria and justify these exemptions in the river basin management plans .
Uvodna izjava 13, ki je bila vstavljena le v osnutku Sveta, je preveč ohlapna in daje vtis, da se lahko izjeme poljubno dovolijo.
Recital 13, which was inserted only in the Council draft, is formulated too vaguely and gives the impression that it might be possible to grant exemptions arbitrarily.
(13a) Preučiti je treba učinke različnih standardov kakovosti podzemne vode (mejne vrednosti), ki jih države članice uporabljajo, potem ko jih ponovno pregledajo, na raven varstva okolja in delovanje notranjega trga.
(13a) The impact on the environmental protection level and on the functioning of the internal market of different groundwater quality standards (threshold values), as applied by the Member States following their revision, should be analysed.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 9 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 9 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Ta poziv Evropskega parlamenta je toliko bolj nujen, ker bodo države članice na podlagi skupnega stališča same odločale o tem, ali in – če bodo to storile – za katere snovi iz dela B Priloge II bodo določile mejne vrednosti.
This EP call is all the more pressing because, according to the common position, the Member States will be free to decide whether to lay down threshold values and, if so, for which substances listed in Annex II, Part B.
(13b) Opraviti je treba raziskave, da se določijo boljša merila za zagotavljanje kakovosti in varovanja ekosistemov podzemnih voda.
(13b) Research should be conducted in order to provide better criteria for ensuring groundwater ecosystem quality and protection.
Če je potrebno, je treba pridobljena spoznanja upoštevati pri izvajanju ali reviziji te direktive.
Where necessary, the findings obtained should be taken into account when implementing or revising this Directive.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 95 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 95 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
(14a) V skladu s členom 11(3)(f) Direktive 2000/60/ES sta zajezitev in odvzem podzemne vode dopustna, če je za to izdano dovoljenje, in priznana za koristen način upravljanja z vodnimi viri.
(14a) In line with Article 11(3)(f) of Directive 2000/60/EC, groundwater storage and recovery should be considered as an allowable practice under permit and acknowledged as a valuable method of water resources management.
Ponovna vložitev uvodne izjave 15, ki jo je Evropski parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi.
Retabling recital 15, as adopted by the European Parliament in first reading.
Načrti umetnega napajanja teles podzemne vode se uporabljajo kot naravni regulacijski sistemi z omogočanjem zajezitve površinske vode, s čimer se izravnajo spremembe pri razpoložljivosti površinskih voda glede na letni čas ter zagotovi stalni in trajnostni vir za pridobivanje pitne vode.
Artificial recharge schemes for groundwater bodies are used as a natural regulating system by providing storage for surface water, and hereby levelling out the seasonal variations of the surface water availability and providing a steady and sustainable source for production of drinking water.
Treba je poudariti, da mora biti za to dejavnost izdano dovoljenje.
The acknowledgement of allowing this practice under permit needs to be emphasized.
(3) "pomemben in stalno naraščajoč trend" pomeni vsako statistično pomembno povečanje koncentracije onesnaževal, skupine onesnaževal ali kazalca onesnaženja , ki predstavljajo tveganje za okolje, za katerega je v skladu s členom 5 potreben obrat trenda;
(3) ‘significant and sustained upward trend’ means any statistically significant increase of concentration of a pollutant, group of pollutants, or indicator of pollution , which presents an environmental risk for which trend reversal is identified as being necessary in accordance with Article 5;
(3) „pomemben in stalno naraščajoč trend“ pomeni vsako statistično in z okoljskega vidika pomembno povečanje koncentracije onesnaževal, skupine onesnaževal ali kazalca onesnaženja v podzemni vodi , za katerega je v skladu s členom 5 potreben obrat trenda;
(3) ‘significant and sustained upward trend’ means any statistically and environmentally significant increase of concentration of a pollutant, group of pollutants, or indicator of pollution in groundwater for which trend reversal is identified as being necessary in accordance with Article 5;
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 18 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 18 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
S tem predlogom spremembe bi bile države članice obvezane, da svoja prizadevanja usmerijo v obrat trendov, ki bi lahko imeli znatne posledice z okoljskega vidika.
The proposed amendment would require Member States to focus their efforts on reversing trends which might have environmentally significant consequences.
Ta pristop bi bil učinkovit tudi z okoljskega in stroškovnega vidika.
This approach would also be effective in environmental and cost terms.
Če bi obdržali besede „ki pomeni nevarnost okolju“, bi to pomenilo odobravanje „trenda dodajanja“.
Retaining the words ‘which presents an environmental risk’ would amount to acceptance of a ‘topping-up trend’.
Člen 2, točka 4 a (novo)
Article 2, point 4 a (new)
(4a) „poslabšanje“ je vsako še tako neznatno antropogeno pogojeno in trajno povečanje koncentracij onesnaževal v podzemni vodi v primerjavi z dosedanjim stanjem.
(4a) ‘ deterioration’ means any slight, anthropogenically induced and persistent increase in concentrations of pollutants in relation to the status quo in the groundwater.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 21 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 21 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Opredeliti je treba vse pojme, ki so uporabljeni v zakonodajnem besedilu in ki so ključnega pomena za razlago zakonodajnega besedila in namen direktive.
All the terms used in the legislative text and which are fundamental to the interpretation of the legislative text and the purpose of the directive must be defined.
V okvirni direktivi o vodah je v členu 2(33) opredeljen le pojem „onesnaževanje“.
In the water framework directive, Article 2, point 33, defines only the term ‘pollution’.
Posledica tega so – nenazadnje tudi v sami okvirni direktivi o vodah – pojmovne nejasnosti, ki so lahko za varovanje podzemne vode zelo pomembne.
This gives rise to conceptual confusion - not least in the water framework directive itself - which may have a significant bearing on groundwater protection.
Člen 2, točka 4 b (novo)
Article 2, point 4 b (new)
(4b) „vrednost ozadja“ je koncentracija snovi v telesu podzemne vode, ki ne ustreza nobenim ali zgolj zelo majhnim antropogenim spremembam neokrnjenih razmer.
(4b) ‘background concentration’ means the concentration of a substance in a groundwater body corresponding to no, or only very minor, anthropogenic alterations to undisturbed conditions.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 22 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 22 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Besedilo je bilo usklajeno z besedilom skupnega stališča.
The wording has been brought into line with that of the common position.
Člen 2, točka 4 c (novo)
Article 2, point 4 c (new)
(4c) „izhodiščna točka“ snovi v telesu podzemne vode je povprečna koncentracija, izmerjena med referenčnima letoma 2007 in 2008 na podlagi programov spremljanja iz člena 8 Direktive 2000/60/ES.
(4c) ‘the baseline concentration’ of a substance in a groundwater body is the average concentration measured during the reference years 2007 and 2008 on the basis of the monitoring programmes established under Article 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 24 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 24 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Člen 3, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 3, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Standardi kakovosti podzemne vode in mejne vrednosti za dobro kemijsko stanje so osnovani na merilih strupenosti za ekosisteme in človeka, na katere se opira opredelitev pojma „onesnaževanje“ iz člena 2(33) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
The groundwater quality standards and threshold values applicable to good chemical status shall be based on the human and ecotoxicological criteria underpinning the definition of pollution in Article 2(33) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 27 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 27 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Merila za dopustne koncentracije onesnaževal v podzemni vodi, pri katerih dobro kemijsko stanje še ostaja nespremenjeno, morajo biti osnovana na pojmu nevarnosti, na katerega se opira opredelitev onesnaževanja iz člena 2(33) okvirne direktive o vodah.
The criteria governing admissible concentrations of pollutants in groundwater which are not sufficient to alter good chemical status must be based on the concept of risk underpinning the definition of pollution in Article 2(33) of the water framework directive.
Po splošnem strokovnem razumevanju je ta meja določena z mejnimi vrednostmi strupenosti za ekosisteme in človeka za podzemno vodo.
The general expert view is that this threshold is defined by the human and ecotoxicological threshold values for groundwater.
Člen 4, odstavek 2, točka (a)
Article 4, paragraph 2, point (a)
(a) vrednosti za standarde kakovosti podzemne vode, navedene v Prilogi I, in ustrezne vrednosti praga, določene v skladu s členom 3 in Prilogo II, niso presežene na nobenem merilnem mestu v telesu ali skupini teles podzemne vode ; ali
(a) the values for the groundwater quality standards listed in Annex I and the relevant threshold values established in accordance with Article 3 and Annex II are not exceeded at any monitoring point in that body or group of bodies of groundwater; or
Razpoložljive informacije o površinskih vodah in kopenskih ekosistemih ter rezultate spremljanja njihovega stanja bi bilo treba uporabljati sistematično, da se dopolnijo relativno skopi podatki o kemijskem stanju, ki temeljijo na mrežah za spremljanje stanja podzemne vode.
Available information and monitoring results for surface waters and terrestrial ecosystems should be systematically used to supplement the relatively sparse information on chemical status based on groundwater monitoring networks.
Na podlagi predlogov sprememb 29 in 65.
Based on EP amendments 29 and 65.
Člen 4, odstavek 2, točka (b) (iii)
Article 4, paragraph 2, point (b) (iii)
(iii) so v skladu z odstavkom 4 Priloge III k tej direktivi izpolnjene zahteve iz člena 7(3) Direktive 2000/60/ES;
(iii) the requirements of Article 7(3) of Directive 2000/60/EC are being met, in accordance with paragraph 4 of Annex III to this Directive;
Te besede bi bilo treba črtati, zato da bo podzemna voda, namenjena odvzemu za pitno vodo, vedno v celoti zaščitena.
These words should be deleted to ensure that all groundwater identified for drinking water abstraction is always fully protected.
Delno obnavlja predlog spremembe 29 Parlamenta zaradi zagotovitve, da bo vsa podzemna voda, namenjena odvzemu za pitno vodo, vedno v celoti zaščitena.
Reinstates parts of Parliament’s amendment 29, to ensure that all groundwater identified for drinking water abstraction is always fully protected.
Če so v telesu podzemne vode ali v skupini teles podzemne vode naravno geogensko pogojene vsebnosti onesnaževal ali kazalcev onesnaževanja, za katere je v skladu z delom B Priloge II določena mejna vrednost, večje od teh vrednosti, določajo naravne vsebnosti plus predvidene mejne vrednosti točko prehoda iz dobrega v slabo stanje.
Where, in a body or group of bodies of groundwater, the natural geogenically determined levels of pollutants or indicators of pollution for which threshold values have been laid down pursuant to Part B of Annex II, are above these values, the natural contents plus the prescribed threshold values shall define the point of transition from good to poor status.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 91 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 91 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Ker pri določanju standardov kakovosti ni mogoče upoštevati naravnih vsebnosti onesnaževal, ki se v Evropi precej razlikujejo med seboj, je treba jasno določiti nadaljnje ukrepanje, če naravne vsebnosti – tako imenovane vrednosti ozadja – že presegajo standarde kakovosti.
Since natural levels of pollutants, which differ very widely in Europe, cannot be taken into account when quality standards are laid down, it must be made clear what should happen if the natural levels - the so-called background concentrations - already exceed the quality standards.
V takih primerih bi bilo treba povečane naravne vsebnosti obravnavati kot standarde kakovosti/mejne vrednosti.
In such cases, the higher natural levels should be regarded as the quality standard/threshold value.
Spoštovanje standardov temelji na primerjavi z aritmetično sredino vrednosti spremljanja na vsakem meritvenem mestu telesa podzemne vode ali skupine teles podzemne vode, ki je bilo razvrščeno ali so bile razvrščene kot ogrožene po analizi, ki se izvaja v skladu s členom 5 Direktive 2000/60/ES.
Compliance with the standards shall be based on a comparison with the arithmetic means of the monitoring values at each of the measurement points in the body or group of bodies of groundwater characterised as being at risk pursuant to the analysis to be carried out under Article 5 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Izmerjene vrednosti na posameznih meritvenih mestih, ki niso v skladu s standardom, odločilno vplivajo na razvrstitev le takrat, ko je določeno meritveno mesto, po strokovnem preverjanju v skladu s Prilogo I in Prilogo II k tej direktivi, reprezentativno za onesnaženost telesa podzemne vode ali njegovega dela.
Measurements at individual measurement points which are not compliant with the standard shall determine the classification only where the measurement point is, according to expert verification pursuant to Annex I and Annex II to this Directive, representative of the pollution of the body of groundwater or a part thereof.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 28 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 28 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Razvrstitev teles podzemne vode na take, ki so v dobrem, in na take, ki so slabem stanju, na podlagi rezultatov merjenja je ključni sestavni del direktive.
Classification of the body of groundwater as having good or poor status on the basis of measurements is a key feature of the directive.
Določbe, ki urejajo razvrščanje morajo biti zato popolnoma jasne.
The provisions governing classification must therefore be absolutely clear.
Če meritveno mesto ne bo reprezentativno za celotno telo podzemne vode ali vsaj za njegov del, se ga za razvrstitev ne bo upoštevalo.
If a measuring point is not representative of the body of groundwater, or at least a part of it, it will not be used to determine classification.
Za razvrstitev telesa podzemne vode je zato vedno potrebna tudi ocena strokovnjakov.
Classification of a body of groundwater thus also always requires an assessment by experts.
Pregled seznama standardov kakovosti podzemne vode iz Priloge I in seznama mejnih vrednosti, ki jih morajo države članice določiti v skladu s Prilogo II
Revision of the list of groundwater quality standards set out in Annex I and of the list of threshold values which the Member States must lay down pursuant to Annex II
5 let po začetku veljavnosti te direktive in potem vsakih 6 let Komisija:
Five years after the entry into force of this Directive and thereafter every six years, the Commission shall:
- pregleda seznam standardov kakovosti podzemne vode iz Priloge I in seznam mejnih vrednosti, določenih v skladu z delom B Priloge II, zlasti na podlagi podatkov, ki jih države članice pripravijo v okviru načrtov upravljanja, znanstvenega in tehničnega napredka ter mnenja odbora iz člena 16(5) Direktive 2000/60/ES;
- review the list of groundwater quality standards set out in Annex I and the list of threshold values laid down pursuant to Part B of Annex II on the basis, in particular, of the information provided by the Member States through the management plans, scientific and technical progress and an opinion of the committee referred to in Article 16(5) of Directive 2000/60/EC;