natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija v enem letu predlaga predlog učinkovitega patenta Evropske skupnosti, ki zagotavlja demokratični nadzor Evropskega parlamenta nad Evropskim patentnim uradom in Evropsko patentno konvencijo .
The Commission shall come forward within a year with a proposal for an effective European Community patent which provides for democratic control by the European Parliament over the European Patent Office and the European Patent Convention.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in doseganja lizbonskih ciljev je zaželeno, da je v Evropski uniji en sam patentni sistem.
With a view to legal certainty and reaching the Lisbon objectives it is desirable that there is one single patent system across the European Union.
Države članice zagotovijo, da njihovi predstavniki v Upravnem svetu Evropske patentne organizacije sprejmejo takšne ukrepe, kot so v njihovi pristojnosti, za zagotovitev, da Evropski patentni urad podeli evropske patente le, ko so izpolnjene zahteve Evropske patentne konvencije, zlasti v zvezi z inventivno ravnjo in tehničnim prispevkom, kot je to opredeljeno v točki (b) člena 2.
Member States shall ensure that their representatives in the a dministrative c ouncil of the European Patent Organisation take such measures as are within their authority to ensure that the European Patent Office only grants European patents when the requirements of the European Patent Convention have been met, in particular with respect to inventive step and technical contribution as defined in point (b) of Article 2 .
Svet Evropskemu parlamentu zagotovi letno poročilo o dejavnostih predstavnikov držav članic, ki so države podpisnice Evropske patentne konvencije, v Upravnem svetu Evropske patentne organizacije, in o napredku pri doseganju ciljev, določenih v zgornjem odstavku.
The Council sh all provide a yearly report to the European Parliament on the activities of representatives of Member States that are Contracting States to the European Patent Convention in the a dministrative c ouncil of the European Patent Organisation , and the progress that has been made in achieving the objectives set out in paragraph 1 .
Ta predlog spremembe priznava, da so države članice tudi države podpisnice Evropske patentne konvencije in da imajo države članice nekaj vpliva na delovanje Evropskega patentnega urada, posebno v zvezi z ohranjanjem visokih standardov preverjanja prijav patentov zlasti v zvezi z inventivno ravnjo in „tehničnim prispevkom“, kot je opredeljeno v tej direktivi.
This amendment recognises that the Member States are also Contracting States of the European Patent Convention and that Member States have some influence the practice of the European Patent Office, specifically with respect to maintaining high standards of examining patent applications in particular with respect to inventive step and ‘technical contribution’ as defined in this directive.
Razen tega ta predlog spremembe zahteva, da države članice (v Svetu) vsako leto poročajo Evropskemu parlamentu o tem, kako so v zvezi s tem dejansko vplivale na EPU, in o napredku, doseženem na poti do cilja zmanjšanja števila podeljenih nevrednih patentov.
Furthermore, this amendment requires Member States (in Council) to report to the European Parliament each year on what they have actually done to influence the EPO in this regard and on the progress that has been made towards the goal of minimising the grant of undeserving patents.
Skupno stališče Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o patentabilnosti računalniško izvedenih izumov
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions
Datum razglasitve prejetja skupnega stališča na zasedanju
Date receipt of common position announced in plenary commune
o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Jeana-Charlesa Marchianija
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Jean-Charles Marchiani
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Jeana-Charlesa Marchianija za zaščito imunitete z dne 19. maja 2005, ki je bila na plenarnem zasedanju objavljena 26.maja 2005,
– having regard to the request by Jean-Charles Marchiani for defence of his immunity of 19 May 2005, announced in plenary sitting on 26 May 2005,
– ob upoštevanju členov 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 ter člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
- ob upoštevanju razsodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 12, maja 1964 in 10. julija 1986
– having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
Glej primer 101/63, Wagner/Fohrmann in Krier, Zbirka 1964, str.
Case 101/63, of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0208/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0208/2005 ),
A. ker je bil poslanec Jean-Charles Marchiani izvoljen v Evropski parlament na petih splošnih neposrednih volitvah 13. junija 1999, ker je veljavnost njegovega mandata preveril parlament 15. decembra 1999
A. whereas Jean-Charles Marchiani was elected to the European Parliament at the fifth direct elections on 13 June 1999, his credentials were verified by Parliament on 15 December 1999
93). in ker je njegov mandat potekel 19.julija 2004,
93). and his term of office ended on 19 July 2004,
B. ker je v obdobju, ko je bil poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, francoski pravosodni organ prisluškoval nekaterim telefonskim pogovorom med poslancem Marchianijem in drugimi;
B. whereas, during the period in which he was a member of the European Parliament, the French judicial authorities intercepted various telephone conversations between Jean-Charles Marchiani and others;
C. ker med zasedanji Evropskega parlamenta poslanci uživajo na nacionalnem teritoriju imunitete, ki so priznane poslancem parlamenta njihove države
C. whereas, during European Parliament sessions, members of the European Parliament enjoy, on their national territory, the immunities accorded to members of their national parliament
Glej člen 10, odstavek 1, črka a) Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti. ,
cf Article 10(1)(a) of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities. ;
D. ker v skladu s členom 100-7 kazenskega zakonika republike Francije ni dovoljeno prestrezanje telefonskih pogovorov na linijah poslancev in senatorjev, ne da bi bil predsednik zadevne skupščine predhodno o tem obveščen s strani preiskovalnega sodnika,
D. whereas, pursuant to Article 100-7 of the Code of criminal procedure of the French Republic, the telephone lines of members of Parliament and of the Senate may not be subject to interception unless the President of the Assembly to which they belong has been informed thereof in advance by the investigating judge,
E. ker je francosko kasacijsko sodišče pokazalo prezir do načela iura novit curia , ko ni uporabilo člena 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 s sklicevanjem na sodbo št. 1784 z dne 16. marca 2005, s čemer je poslancu Jeanu-Charlesu Marchianiju odreklo imuniteto, ki jo za nacionalne parlamentarce določa člen 100-7 kazenskega zakonika,
E. whereas the French Court of Cassation, disregarding the principle of iura novit curia , failed to apply Article 10 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965 in its judgment No 1784 of 16 March 2005, thus denying Jean-Charles Marchiani the immunity accorded to members of the national parliament under Article 100-7 of the Code of criminal procedure,
3. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in poročilo pristojnega odbora nemudoma posreduje kasacijskemu sodišču, vladi, nacionalni skupščini in senatu Republike Francije.
Instructs its President to forward this decision and the report of the committee responsible to the Court of Cassation, the government, the National Assembly and the Senate of the French Republic.
a) sul territorio nazionale, delle immunità riconosciute ai membri del Parlamento del loro paese;. .".
(a) in the territory of their own state, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament; (...)’ .
Ne consegue che, in virtù del combinato disposto degli articoli 10, lettera a) del Protocollo sui privilegi e sulle immunità delle Comunità europee e 100-7 del codice di procedura penale francese, l'autorità giudiziaria francese non poteva legittimamente effettuare alcuna intercettazione delle linee telefoniche dell'On.
It follows that, by virtue of the combined provisions of Article 10(1) of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 100-7 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure, the French judicial authority could not lawfully carry out any interception of Mr Marchiani’s telephone line without having previously informed the President of the European Parliament.
100-7 del codice di procedura penale - nota del redattore-) sia applicabile ai rappresentanti al Parlamento europeo ", e conclude che tale disposizione riguarda esclusivamente i deputati nazionali francesi.
It is immediately apparent that this supreme judicial authority has erred in disregarding, or refusing to apply, a provision of primary European law which the French Republic is obliged to observe scrupulously.
Zahteva za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Jeana-Charlesa Marchianija
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Jean-Charles Marchiani
Zahteva za zaščito imunitete vložil(-a) Datum zahteve Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Request for defence of immunity from Date of request Date announced in plenary
proti: 6 vzdržani: 0
against: 6 abstentions: 0
- ob upoštevanju členov 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 ter člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
- having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and to Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
- ob upoštevanju razsodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 12. maja 1964 in 10. julija 1986
- having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
Glej primer 101/63 - Wagner proti Fohrmannu in Krierju [1964] ECR 195 in primer 149/85: Wybot proti Faureju in drugimi [1986] ECR 2391. ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0209/2005 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0209/2005 ),
A. ker je bil Umberto Bossi poslanec Evropskega parlamenta v četrtem parlamentarnem obdobju (nastop mandata 19. julija 1994, preverjanje veljavnosti mandata 15. novembra 1994, prenehanje mandata 19. julija 1999) in petem parlamentarnem obdobju (nastop mandata 20. julija 1999, preverjanje veljavnosti mandata 15. decembra 1999, prenehanje mandata 10. junija 2001 zaradi nezdružljivosti),
A. whereas Umberto Bossi was a Member of the European Parliament in the fourth legislative term (start of mandate on 19 July 1994, mandate verified on 15 November 1994, mandate expired on 19 July 1999) and in the fifth legislative term (start of mandate on 20 July 1999, mandate verified on 15 December 1999, mandate expired on 10 June 2001 for incompatibility),
B. ker se zoper poslanca Evropskega parlamenta ne sme začeti preiskava, ne sme biti priprt niti se zoper njega ne sme začeti sodni postopek zaradi mnenja ali glasu, ki ga je izrekel ali oddal pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti
B. whereas Members of the European Parliament may not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties
Člen 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti (PPI) ,
Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities. ,
C. ker imuniteta pred sodnimi postopki, ki jo uživajo poslanci Evropskega parlamenta vključuje tudi imuniteto pred civilnimi postopki,
C. whereas the immunity from legal proceedings enjoyed by Members of the European Parliament also covers immunity from civil proceedings,
Umberta Bossija;
Decides to defend the immunity and privileges of Umberto Bossi;
Zahteva za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev g.
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Umberto Bossi
Umberta Bossija
Procedure number
člen 6(3) in člen 7
Rules 6(3) and 7
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.........................................................3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.........................................................4
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.........................................................5
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
- ob upoštevanju členov 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 ter člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
- having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
- ob upoštevanju razsodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 12. maja 1964 in 10. julija 1986
- having regard to the judgements of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
Glej primer 101/63: Wagner proti Fohrmannu in Krierju [1964] ECR 195 in primer 149/85: Wybot proti Faureju in drugim [1986] ECR 2391. ,
Case 101/63: Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85: Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– ob upoštevanju člena 6(3) in člena 7 svojega Poslovnika,
- having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0210/2005 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0210/2005 ),
A. ker je bil Umberto Bossi poslanec Evropskega parlamenta v četrtem parlamentarnem obdobju (nastop mandata 19. julija 1994, preverjanje veljavnosti mandata 15. novembra 1994, prenehanje mandata 19. julija 1999) in v petem parlamentarnem obdobju (nastop mandata 20. julija 1999, preverjanje veljavnosti mandata 15. decembra 1999, prenehanje mandata 10. junija 2001 zaradi nezdružljivosti);
A. whereas Umberto Bossi was a Member of the European Parliament in the fourth legislative term (start of mandate on 19 July 1994, mandate verified on 15 November 1994, mandate expired on 19 July 1999) and in the fifth legislative term (start of mandate on 20 July 1999, mandate verified on 15 December 1999, mandate expired on 10 June 2001 for incompatibility),
B. ker se zoper poslanca Evropskega parlamenta ne sme začeti preiskava, ne sme biti priprt niti se zoper njega ne sme začeti sodni postopek zaradi mnenja ali glasu, ki ga je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti
B. whereas Members of the European Parliament may not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties
Člen 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti (PPI) ;
Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities. ,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve (A6‑0000/2005),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0000/2005),
Člen 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti. ;
Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities. ,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve (A6-0000/2005),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0000/2005),
B. ker poslanci Evropskega parlamenta v svoji državi uživajo enako imuniteto pred sodnim postopkom kot poslanci parlamenta te države
B. whereas Members of the European Parliament shall enjoy in their own state immunity from legal proceedings equivalent to that of a Member of the Parliament of that state
Člen 10(a) Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti. ;
Article 10(a) of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities. ,
C. ker je v primeru, ki ga ureja sodba sodišča v Milanu, Umberto Bossi proti italijanskim policistom, ki so opravljali preiskavo na milanskem sedežu stranke Lega Nord, ki jo je odredil javni tožilec iz Verone, uporabil nasilje ter jim grozil;
C. whereas in the case covered by the judgement of the Magistrates' Court in Milan Umberto Bossi used violence against, and threatened, officers of the Italian police, who were conducting a search of the premises of the Milan headquarters of the Lega Nord, ordered by the Verona Public Prosecutor,
D. ker je bil ob tem času Umberto Bossi poslanec italijanskega parlamenta in je italijansko ustavno sodišče 17. maja 2001 odločilo, da ne uživa parlamentarne imunitete, saj razžalitve, upiranje in nasilje nikakor niso dejanja, za katera se lahko uporablja parlamentarni privilegij;
D. whereas at that time Umberto Bossi was a member of the Italian Parliament and the Italian Constitutional Court decided, on 17 May 2001, that he did not enjoy parliamentary immunity finding that insults and acts of resistance and violence are in no way acts in which parliamentary privilege may apply,
E. ker se v takem primeru lahko uporabi le člen 10(a) omenjenega protokola in ker se zdi, da poslanci italijanskega parlamenta ne uživajo parlamentarne imunitete v zvezi s sodnimi postopki v takšnih okoliščinah;
E. whereas in such a case only Article 10(a) of the above Protocol can be applied and it appears that Members of the Italian Parliament do not enjoy Parliamentary immunity in respect of legal proceedings in such circumstances,
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 7(2) of the Rules of Procedure, after consideration the reasons for and against defending the Member's immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should not defend the Parliamentary immunity of Mr Umberto Bossi .
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 7(2) of the Rules of Procedure, after consideration the reasons for and against defending the Member's immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should defend the Parliamentary immunity of Mr Umberto Bossi .
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti („Rim II”)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations ("Rome II")
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA......................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................3
MNENJE ODBORA ZA DRŽAVLJANSKE SVOBOŠČINE, PRAVOSODJE IN NOTRANJE ZADEVE 39
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 3
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o veljavnem pravu za nepogodbene obveznosti („Rim II”)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations ("Rome II")
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0427 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0427 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 61(c) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija predlog poslala Parlamentu ( C5‑0338/2003 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 61(c) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5‑0338/2003 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0211/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0211/2005 ),
(5) Področje te uredbe mora biti določeno tako, da je v skladu z Uredbo(ES) št. 44/2001 in Rimsko konvencijo iz leta 1980.
(5) The scope of the Regulation must be determined in such a way as to be consistent with Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 and the Rome Convention of 1980 .
(5) Področje in določbe te Uredbe se določijo tako, da so v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti ter priznavanju in izvrševanju sodb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah in z Uredbo (ES) št. ../... o veljavnem pravu za pogodbene obveznosti („Rim I”) .
(5) The scope and provisions of this Regulation must be determined in such a way as to be consistent with Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and Regulation (EC) No ../... on the law applicable to contractual obligations (" Rome I") .
Uredba mora biti v skladu ne le z Rimsko konvencijo iz leta 1980, ki ostaja v veljavi zaradi dejstva, da Danska ne sodeluje pri uporabi uredbe, pač pa tudi z novo uredbo, ki bo izhajala iz projekta Rim II.
It is self-evident that the Regulation should be consistent not only with the 1980 Rome Convention, which will continue in being owing to the fact that Denmark is not participating in the adoption of the Regulation, but also with the new regulation which will emerge from the Rome I project.
(5a) Skrb za skladnost v pravu Skupnosti zahteva, da se ta uredba brez poseganja v določbe, ki se nanašajo na veljavno pravo (oziroma vplivajo nanj), ki je vsebovano v instrumentih sekundarne zakonodaje poleg te uredbe, kot so konfliktna pravila v konkretnih zadevah, prevladujoča obvezna pravila, ki izvirajo iz Skupnosti, in temeljna pravna načela v zvezi z notranjim trgom.
(5a) The concern for consistency in Community law requires that this Regulation be without prejudice to provisions relating to or having an effect on the applicable law, contained in instruments of secondary legislation other than this Regulation, such as conflict rules in specific matters, overriding mandatory rules of Community origin, and the basic legal principles of the internal market.
Posledično mora Uredba spodbujati pravilno delovanje notranjega trga, zlasti prost pretok blaga in storitev.
As a result, this Regulation should promote the proper functioning of the internal market, in particular the free movement of goods and services.
Predlog spremembe, ki temelji na besedilu devetnajste uvodne izjave Komisije, se mora brati skupaj s spremembo člena 1 (Materialno področje, ki ga je treba brati kot „vsebinsko področje”).
This amendment, which is based on the wording of the Commission's recital 19, should be read together with the amendment to Article 1 (Material scope, which should read "substantive scope").
Bistveno je, da pravila uredbe ne ovirajo pravilnega delovanje notranjega trga.
It is essential that the rules of this Regulation should not hamper the proper functioning of the Internal Market.
(7) Načelo lex loci delicti commissi je osnovna rešitev pri nepogodbenih obveznostih v praktično vseh državah članicah, vendar se praktična uporaba načela tam, kjer so sestavni dejavniki primera razpršeni prek več držav, obravnava drugače.
(7) The principle of the lex loci delicti commissi is the basic solution for non-contractual obligations in virtually all the Member States , but the practical application of the principle where the component factors of the case are spread over several countries is handled differently.
To stanje zadeva negotovosti v zakonodaji.
This situation engenders uncertainty in the law.