natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V primeru večjega onesnaženja s kemikalijami v vodah držav članic EU tretje osebe tako ne bi dobile ustreznega nadomestila, ker jim to onemogoča zgornja meja omejitve LLMC.
In the event of major marine pollution caused by chemical substances in the waters of the Member States of the EU, third parties would therefore not be properly compensated, as they would be subject to the LLMC liability ceilings.
Za izognitev tveganju, da bi huda škoda ostala neporavnana, se predlaga, da se države članice pozove k ratificiranju Konvencije HNS v roku prenosa direktive, in da se omogoči njena vključitev v pravo Skupnosti.
To counter the possibility of serious damage being allowed to go without compensation, it is proposed that the Member States be asked to ratify the HNS Convention within the deadline for transposing the directive and enable it to be incorporated into Community law.
Takšna rešitev bo omogočila nadomestilo najhujše škode (kemikalije) in dopolnitev zgornje meje odgovornosti iz Konvencije HNS s skladom, enakovrednim Mednarodnemu skladu za nadomestilo škode zaradi onesnaženja z ogljikovodiki (FIPOL), katerega ta konvencija uvaja.
This would make it possible to compensate the worst damage (chemical substances) and to supplement the liability ceiling in the HNS Convention by a fund equivalent to the FIPOL set up by the latter convention.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da so ovire za ratifikacijo Konvencije HNS zgolj tehnične narave in bi bile lahko odpravljene v predlaganem roku za ratifikacijo.
Your rapporteur firmly believes that the obstacles to the ratification of the HNS Convention are purely technical and could be overcome within the proposed ratification deadline.
Očitno gre za vprašanje povečanja sredstev odškodninskega sklada HNS, zlasti zaradi težav pri ugotavljanju, kdo so prejemniki, in pri zagotavljanju sledljivosti nekaterih snovi iz konvencije ter preverjanju stvarnosti količine in vrednosti uvoza teh snovi za izračun prispevka iz navedenega sklada HNS.
The problem apparently concerns the question of supplementary HNS compensation fund, in relation in particular to the difficulty of identifying collectors and ensuring the traceability of some of the substances covered by the convention, and verifying the accuracy of the volume and value of the imports of the substances so as to calculate the contribution to the abovementioned HNS fund.
Vprašanje sledljivosti kemikalij v pomorskem prometu bi se delno lahko obravnavalo v predlogu tretjega pomorskega paketa o spremljanju prometa (Sterckxovo poročilo).
The question of the traceability of chemical substances during maritime transport could be partially addressed under a proposal forming part of the third maritime safety package concerning traffic monitoring (Sterckx report).
Razširitev pojma krivdnega dejanja, ki omogoča prekoračitev omejitve odgovornosti
Extending the concept of fault allowing the liability ceiling to be exceeded
Sodišča držav članic zelo različno razlagajo krivdno dejanje, ki presega zgornjo mejo omejitve odgovornosti (nedopustno krivdno dejanje), opredeljeno v Konvenciji LLMC.
The LLMC Convention's definition of a fault enabling the liability ceiling to be exceeded (wilful misconduct) is interpreted in different ways by the Member States' courts.
Nekatera sodišča, da priznajo odpravo omejitve odgovornosti, še naprej zahtevajo, da pritožnik dokaže, da se je odgovorna oseba dejansko zavedala škodljivih posledic svojega ravnanja.
Some courts continue to require the plaintiff to provide proof that the person liable was actually aware of the harmful consequences of his behaviour in order to accept the lifting of the liability ceiling.
Odgovorni osebi je tako dejansko dana skoraj absolutna pravica do omejitve svoje odgovornosti.
The result is that the perpetrator enjoys what is a virtually absolute right to limit his liability.
Drugi sodniki menijo, da resnost dejanja ali njegove opustitve daje sklepati, da se je njegov storilec moral zavedati škodljivih posledic, ki bi iz tega lahko izhajale.
Other judges consider that the gravity of the act or omission must in some cases prompt the conclusion that the perpetrator must have been aware of the harmful consequences which might result.
Takšne razlike v razlagi so neustrezne v času, ko sta načelo varnosti in načelo "plačnik plača" uveljavljena in se izvajata v pravu Skupnosti in ko je zaščita državljanov pred industrijskimi nevarnostmi glavna skrb javne politike.
This difference of interpretation must be seen as a shortcoming at a time when the precautionary and 'polluter pays' principles are recognised and implemented by Community law and when protection of citizens from industrial risks is a major concern of public policy.
Takšno stanje ne prispeva k temu, da bi bili upravljavci pomorskega prometa pazljivejši in da bi bolj spoštovali mednarodne standarde, niti k pravičnejšemu obravnavanju žrtev kot tretjih oseb, ki so lahko oškodovane z omejitvijo odškodnine, čeprav naj bi odgovorna oseba ravnala nevarno in naj bi ji bilo vseeno za posledice svojega dejanja ("recklessness").
Nor does this state of affairs do anything to encourage vigilance and the compliance with international standards by maritime transport operators or to ensure fair treatment of third party victims who may suffer because of the limitation of the compensation they can receive, even though the guilty party may have acted dangerously and without concern for the harmful consequences of his action ('recklessness').
Zato je predlagana širša razlaga pojma krivdnega dejanja, da ima sodnik možnost dvigniti zgornjo mejo omejitve odgovornosti v primeru, ko bi se odgovorne osebe morale zavedati verjetnosti škode, če bi ravnale strokovno.
It is therefore suggested that a broad interpretation of the concept of wilful misconduct be introduced so as to allow the courts the possibility of lifting the liability ceiling in cases where the party liable, had he acted in a proper professional manner, should have been aware of the probable damage that would result.
Takšna razlaga, vključena v direktivo, bi omogočila obravnavanje najhujše škode zaradi onesnaženja, povzročene tretjim osebam, ki niso del prometa ali niso udeležene pri povzročitvi okoljske škode pri vodnem ter obalnem živalstvu in rastlinstvu (kemične nesreče).
Including this interpretation in the directive would make it possible to address the most serious cases of pollution damage suffered by third parties not involved in the transport operation, as well as environmental damage to aquatic or coastal fauna and flora (chemical disasters).
Vključitev besedila v pravo Skupnosti bi poleg tega Sodišču omogočila, da bi to razlago uveljavil v vseh državah članicah.
Furthermore, incorporating these provisions into Community law would enable the Court of Justice to enforce this interpretation in all Member States.
Izločitev uporabe sistema omejitve odgovornosti za ladje, ki plujejo pod zastavo države, ki ni ratificirala Konvencije LLMC
Barring the application of the limited liability regime to ships flying the flag of a state which has not ratified the LLMC Convention
S predlogom Komisije (člen 4.3) bi bila odpravljena ugodnost omejitve odgovornosti v primeru hude malomarnosti lastnika ladje, ki pluje pod zastavo države, ki ni ratificirala Konvencije LLMC.
The Commission proposal (Article 4(3)) would withdraw the benefit of limitation of liability in the event of gross negligence on the part of the owner of a ship flying the flag of a state which has not ratified the LLMC Convention.
Cilj te določbe je torej spodbuditi države članice IMO k ratificiranju konvencije in spodbuditi širšo uporabo mednarodnega prava.
This provision is clearly intended to encourage IMO member states to ratify the convention and promote wider application of international law.
Če je cilj te določbe treba podpreti, pa so pogoji njenega izvajanja kontraproduktivni.
While the aim of this provision should be supported, the means provided for achieving it are counterproductive.
Z uvedbo pojma hude malomarnosti, in še zlasti, če je opredeljen naknadno, uvedemo nov pojem, ki ga bo zelo težko razlikovati od krivdnega dejanja ("wilful misconduct").
In fact, the introduction and, to an ever greater extent, the definition of the concept of gross negligence, means that we now have a new concept very difficult to distinguish from that of wilful misconduct.
Takšna nejasnost pri uporabi pojma krivdnega dejanja lahko postavi pod vprašaj že dosežen napredek v sodni praksi za zadeve pomorske civilne odgovornosti, obravnavane na podlagi konvencij IMO (Konvencija CLC).
This confusion over how to apply concepts of fault could call into question the case-law advances made in maritime civil liability cases dealt with under the IMO conventions (CLC).
S tem bi pri reševanju nesreč na pristojnih sodiščih uvedli kompleksen element, tako da bi morala sodišča razlikovati med pojmoma hude malomarnosti in krivdnega dejanja, včasih celo pri reševanju iste nesreče (trk).
It would introduce an element of complexity into the settlement of disputes by the courts concerned, which would have to distinguish - sometimes in the case of a single accident - between the concepts of gross negligence and wilful misconduct, at a time when there is a trend in some countries' courts to make the criterion of wilful misconduct, more flexible, a trend your rapporteur proposes to support via an amendment to Article 4.
Ker bi ta izključitev veljala samo za škodo, povzročeno tretjim osebam (ki niso del prometa), ne bi bilo dvomov glede pravnih in poslovnih odnosov med sodelujočimi v prometu.
Since this exclusion would apply only to damage caused to third parties (not involved in the transport), it would not call into question the legal and commercial relations between participants in the transport operation.
Organizacija učinkovitega obravnavanja izdaje in spremljanja potrdil o jamstvu za civilno odgovornost
Effective management of the issuing and monitoring of civil liability guarantee certificates
Sprejemanje dokumentov o jamstvu za finančno odgovornost in preverjanje njihove veljavnosti je zahtevna, vendar potrebna naloga, ki zahteva precejšnja materialna in človeška sredstva.
Examining financial liability guarantee documents, and checking whether they are valid and in compliance with the directive is an onerous but necessary task requiring substantial human and material resources.
Prva možnost, kot jo predlaga Komisija, je delovanje v okviru mreže nacionalnih pristojnih nadzornih organov prek sistema SAFESEANET
One way of proceeding, as proposed by the Commission, would be to use the network of national control authorities through the SAFESEANET facility
V tem primeru bi bilo treba v direktivo o spremljanju prometa vključiti ustrezne določbe (Sterckxovo poročilo). , pri čemer imajo pristojni organi države članice možnost nasprotnega preverjanja osnutka potrdila, ki ga izda pristojni organ na kraju vplutja ladje.
The relevant provisions would need to be included in the traffic monitoring directive (Sterckx report). , with scope for cross-checking by any Member State authority of a draft certificate issued by the authority responsible at the ship's point of entry.
Druga možnost je zaupanje te naloge uradu Skupnosti, ki ima zadostno avtonomijo in ustrezna sredstva.
The second possibility would be to assign this task to a Community office endowed with the necessary independence and appropriate facilities.
Sistem izdaje in upravljanja potrdil mora v vsakem primeru preprečiti izdajo potrdil ugodnosti ali potrdil, ki temeljijo na spornih elementih.
The system for issuing and monitoring certificates must in any case make it possible to prevent the issuing of certificates of convenience or, more generally, certificates based on dubious data.
V zvezi s tem je predlog Komisije vprašljiv predvsem, kar se tiče učinkovitosti materialnih in človeških sredstev, ki bi jih imeli na razpolago pristojni nadzorni organi države pristanišča za zagotovitev doslednega izvajanja zahtevnega sistema potrdil.
With this in view, the danger of the Commission proposal lies rather in the question of whether the human and material resources available to port state control authorities can effectively perform the sensitive and onerous task of certification.
Poročevalec je zato mnenja, da bi bilo zaželeno sprejeti rešitev na ravni Skupnosti z ustanovitvijo ad hoc organa, ki bi se ukvarjal s preverjanjem in zbiranjem potrdil.
Your rapporteur therefore believes that it would be worthwhile to set up a special body to provide a Community solution for the verification and centralisation of certificates.
Urad Skupnosti bi bil na začetku lahko pristojen za vodenje evidence potrdil o jamstvih, ki jih izdajo države članice, ter za preverjanje njihove veljavnosti in resničnosti njihovih vsebin.
A Community office could initially be given responsibility for keeping a register of guarantee certificates issued by Member States and for verifying the validity and veracity of these certificates.
Glede izdajanja potrdil je treba nazadnje obvezati Komisijo, da bo poročala o delovanju sistema potrdil, in po potrebi predvideti možnost srednjeročnega prenosa izdaje potrdil na raven Skupnosti.
As for the issuing of certificates, the Commission should be required to draw up a report on the operation of the certification system, with the possibility, if necessary, of bringing the issuing of certificates within Community competence in the medium term.
V primeru hudih pomorskih nesreč je dodana vrednost, ki jo ima ukrepanje Evropske unije, seveda veliko večja, kot če posamezne države članice ukrepajo posamezno.
Maritime casualties are one of the areas in which EU action most obviously provides added value in relation to individual action by Member States.
Hkrati evropski državljani močno upajo, da bo Evropska unija ukrepala tako, da v prihodnosti ne bo več prihajalo do tovrstnih nesreč in bodo krivci zanje kaznovani.
They are also an area in which citizens have pinned great hopes on the EU’s ability to avert future disasters and end such impunity as the culprits might enjoy.
Zaradi tega je izjemno pomembno, da institucije Skupnosti sprejmejo stroge in učinkovite pravne predpise, ki bodo izhajali iz dveh temeljnih načel: varovanje okolja in pravna zaščita žrtev.
It is therefore vital for the EU institutions to adopt stringent, effective legal rules based on the two core principles of environmental protection and legal protection of victims .
S pravnega stališča je predlog Evropske komisije dober , saj uvaja zanimive nove pravne mehanizme, ki naj bi bistveno povečali zaščito obalnih predelov in omogočili povračilo škode žrtvam pomorskih nesreč.
From the legal point of view, the Commission proposal should be welcomed , since it introduces novel legal arrangements likely to make coasts much safer and enable the victims of maritime casualties to obtain compensation more easily.
Predlog je pretehtan, realističen in se ne oddaljuje od že obstoječih aktov.
At the same time, the proposal is moderate and realistic without, moreover, breaking radically with the status quo .
Sledi določilom mednarodnega prava in zlasti konvencij, ki so bile podpisane v okviru mednarodne pomorske organizacije.
On the contrary, it is consistent with international law and especially the conventions signed in the International Maritime Organisation.
Naj izpostavimo naslednje pozitivne točke:
The following points should be mentioned in particular:
§ vključitev v domeno Skupnosti konvencije iz leta 1996 o omejevanju odgovornosti za pomorske zahtevke, ki je večina držav članic še vedno ne uporablja,
· ‘Communitarisation’ of the 1996 LLMC , which most Member States are presently not enforcing;
§ obveznost za ladje, ki plujejo pod zastavo države članice Evropske unije ali tretje države, da zagotovijo finančna jamstva za kritje stroškov v primeru razpustitve pomorščakov ali nesreče in
· the obligation for ships flying the flag of a Member State or a non-member country to have substantial financial guarantees , to be called upon in the event of abandonment of seafarers or when an accident has occurred; and
§ uvedba neposrednega ukrepa , po katerem lahko žrtve neposredno na dajalca finančnega jamstva naslovijo zahtevke za nadomestilo, s čimer se precej olajšajo in pospešijo zdaj veljavni pravni mehanizmi.
· the introduction of direct action whereby victims may apply directly to guarantors with a view to obtaining compensation, a system which will greatly facilitate and speed up the existing legal procedures.
Dejstvo, da je obvezno položiti finančna jamstva, ki ne smejo biti nižja od zgornje meje, opredeljene s konvencijo iz leta 1996, predstavlja pozitivni element, čeprav se zdi predlog o podvojitvi tega zneska malce arbitraren.
The obligation to take out guarantees not falling below the limits laid down in the LLMC is fundamentally desirable, although the criterion of doubling the ceilings appears to be somewhat arbitrary.
Vseeno moramo predlog sprejeti ugodno.
Nevertheless, the provision should be supported.
Po drugi strani s previdnostjo sprejemamo uvedbo merila hude malomarnosti, ki vzpostavlja mejo, od katere ni več omejena odgovornost lastnika ladje pod zastavo države članice, ki ni pogodbenica konvencije iz leta 1996.
On the other hand, caution would be the most advisable response to the use of serious misconduct as the criterion whereby a shipowner’s liability could not be limited if his ship were flying the flag of a state that was not a contracting party to the 1996 Convention and he were to be guilty of serious misconduct .
Da bi bil neposreden ukrep kar najbolj učinkovit, predlagamo, da ob izdaji potrdila o finančnem jamstvu pristojni organi upoštevajo tudi to, v kolikšni meri so subjekti, ki izdajo jamstvo, komercialno prisotni v Evropski uniji.
Finally, to enable direct action to be exercised to the best possible effect, it is suggested that, when granting guarantee certificates, the authorities concerned should also take into account the business presence which guarantors might have established in the EU .
Ob upoštevanju vseh navedenih razlogov menimo, da predlog Komisije lahko sprejmemo z naklonjenostjo, saj prispeva k večji zaščiti evropskih obalnih predelov in otokov.
For all the reasons set out above, the Commission proposal should be endorsed, since it marks a further step forward enabling Europe ’s coasts and islands to be made safe.
Vseeno pa ne smemo pozabiti na dejstvo, da je predlog direktive po naravi subsidiaren in da moramo glavno prednost nameniti zaščiti okolja in žrtev: uveljavitvi konvencij CLC in HNS v vseh državah članicah.
This proposal for a directive is, however, a subsidiary measure: the real priority from the point of view of protecting the environment and citizens is for the CLC and HNS conventions to enter into force in all the Member States.
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za promet in turizem kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(1a) Zaščita evropskih obal in evropskih državljanov pred vsakršno ekološko škodo, ki bi nastala zaradi ladijskih nesreč, je nesporna prednostna naloga Evropske unije.
(1a) Protection of European coasts and European citizens in the face of ecological damage of any kind resulting from maritime casualties is an absolute priority for the EU.
(1b) Zaščita evropskih obal obsega dva vidika: preprečevanje nesreč, s tem ko se zagotovi, da dovoljenje za plovbo prejmejo le varne ladje, in vzpostavitev ustreznih mehanizmov, po katerih bodo žrtve lahko v najkrajšem možnem času prejele polno nadomestilo za škodo, nastalo ob nesreči.
(1b) Protecting European coasts involves the dual aspects of preventing accidents by ensuring that only safe ships sail and of providing for the arrangements required to ensure that victims can, in as short a time as possible, receive compensation fully commensurate with the damage caused by an accident.
4bis. „Subjekt, ki izda jamstvo": subjekt, pri katerem lastnik sklene finančno jamstvo.
(4a) “guarantor” means any institution with which a shipowner takes out a financial guarantee;
V skladu s členom 15 Konvencije iz leta 1996 države članice zagotovijo, da se člen 4 te konvencije o odpravi omejitev, ne uporablja za ladje, ki plujejo pod zastavo države, ki ni pogodbenica omenjene konvencije.
In accordance with Article 15 of the 1996 Convention, Member States shall ensure that Article 4 of that Convention concerning the barring of limitation for liability does not apply to ships flying the flag of a State which is not a contracting party to the 1996 Convention.
V takih primerih mora sistem civilne odgovornosti, ki ga države članice vzpostavijo v skladu s to direktivo, predvidevati, da lastnik ladje izgubi pravico do omejitve svoje odgovornosti , če se dokaže, da je škoda nastala zaradi osebnega dejanja ali opustitve dejanja lastnika, storjenega namenoma ali iz hude malomarnosti .
In such cases, the civil liability regime established by the Member States in accordance with this Directive shall provide that the shipowner loses the right to limit his liability if it is proved that the damage resulted from his personal act or omission, committed with the intent to cause such damage, or through gross negligence .
V skladu s členom 15 konvencije iz leta 1996 države članice zagotovijo, da se člen 4 te konvencije o odpravi omejitev, ne uporablja za ladje, ki plujejo pod zastavo države, ki ni pogodbenica omenjene konvencije.
In accordance with Article 15 of the 1996 Convention, Member States shall ensure that Article 4 of that Convention concerning the barring of limitation for liability does not apply to ships flying the flag of a State which is not a contracting party to the 1996 Convention.
V takih primerih lastnik ladje ne more omejiti svoje odgovornosti za škodo, za katero je zaradi svojega dejanja ali opustitve v celoti ali delno odgovoren .
In such cases, the shipowner may not limit his liability for damage for which he is wholly or partly responsible, whether by action or by omission .
Uvedba hude malomarnosti kot merila za določitev lastnikove neomejene odgovornosti bi lahko privedla do pravne negotovosti, ker ta koncept ni opredeljen in obstaja nevarnost, da bi v sodni praksi prišlo do različnih razlag, ki bi lahko sovpadale s pojmom nedopustno ravnanje.
The use of serious misconduct as the criterion determining a shipowner’s unlimited liability might give rise to legal confusion because this concept is not defined and is in danger of being interpreted in judicial practice in conflicting terms that could overlap with the concept of ‘inexcusable conduct’.
Kljub temu uporaba sistema civilnopravne odgovornosti lastnikov ladij, katerih države niso podpisnice konvencije iz leta 1996, spodbuja k podpisu in ratifikaciji te konvencije in ne vodi v pravno negotovost.
On the other hand, applying the civil liability regime to shipowners whose countries have not signed the 1996 Convention, in addition to providing an incentive to sign and ratify the Convention, does not entail any legal uncertainty.
Ob izdaji potrdila morajo pristojni organi upoštevati komercialno navzočnost subjekta, ki izda jamstvo, v Evropski uniji.
When issuing certificates, competent authorities shall also consider the question whether a guarantor has business establishments in the EU.
Komercialna navzočnost subjekta, ki izda jamstvo, v EU, najsibo prek zastopnika ali podružnice, mora biti merilo, ki ga bodo pristojni organi upoštevali pri izdaji potrdila o jamstvu.
The business presence of guarantors in the EU, whether in the form of an agent or a branch office, should be one of the criteria on which competent authorities should base their assessments when granting guarantee certificates.
Tako se onemogoči vsakršni možni poseg v učinkovitost neposrednega ukrepa zaradi postopka, po katerem bi naprimer žrtve morale sprožiti sodni postopek v državi, ki ne izpolnjuje minimalnih zahtev pravne države.
This would prevent direct action being hamstrung for legal reasons, as would be the case if, for example, victims were obliged to start court proceedings in a country that did not meet the minimum requirements of the rule of law.