natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če so v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo obsodbe, izrečene v drugih državah članicah proti državljanom in osebam, ki bivajo v njej, vpisane v nacionalno kazensko evidenco, pravila, ki urejajo vpis, morebitne spremembe ali izbris zaznamka, v nobenem primeru ne smejo pomeniti, da je oseba obravnavana slabše, kakor bi bila obravnavana, če bi bila obsodba izrečena v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
If, under national legislation, convictions handed down in the other Member States against nationals or residents are entered in the national criminal record, the rules governing entry in the record, modifications or deletion of the information entered may under no circumstances have the effect of causing the person to be treated more unfavourably than if he/she had been convicted by a national court.
Glej obrazložitev predloga spremembe k členu 6, odstavek 1.
See the justification for amendment article 6, paragraph 1
Kakršna koli sprememba ali izbris zaznamka v državi članici, ki je izrekla obsodbo, ima za posledico izbris ali enakovredno spremembo v državi članici državljanstva ali bivališča osebe, če je izvedla vpis in je bila obveščena o spremembi ali izbrisu, razen če zakonodaja te države ne predvidi določbe, ki so ugodnejše za obsojeno osebo.
Any modification or deletion of an entry in the convicting Member State shall entail an equivalent deletion or modification in the Member State of nationality or residence if it made an entry in the record and is informed of the modification or deletion, unless the legislation of the latter State provides for more favourable treatment for the convicted person.
Ta okvirni sklep nadomesti določbe iz člena 56 Evropske konvencije o mednarodni veljavnosti kazenskih sodb, sestavljene v Haagu dne 28. maja 1970, ki veljajo med državami članicami, brez poseganja v njihovo uporabo v odnosih med državami članicami in tretjimi državami.
Without prejudice to its application in relations between the Member States and third countries, this Framework Decision replaces Article 56 of the Hague Convention of 28 May 1970 on the International Validity of Criminal Judgments as between the Member States.
Ta okvirni sklep se uporablja med državami članicami brez poseganja v določbe iz člena 56 Evropske konvencije o mednarodni veljavnosti kazenskih sodb, sestavljene v Haagu dne 28. maja 1970, v povezavi z odnosi med državami članicami in tretjimi državami.
This Framework Decision shall apply between the Member States without prejudice to Article 56 of the Hague Convention of 28 May 1970 on the International Validity of Criminal Matters with regard to the relations between Member States and third countries.
Malo verjetno je, da bi lahko člen iz okvirnega sklepa nadomestil določbo iz mednarodne konvencije.
It is very doubtful that a provision of an international convention may be replaced by an article of a Framework decision.
Poročevalec zato predlaga uporabo tega okvirnega sklepa med državami članicami brez poseganja v določbe zadevne mednarodne konvencije.
The rapporteur therefore suggests the application of this framework decision amongst the Member States without prejudice to the provisions of the relevant international convention.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem okvirnim sklepom najkasneje do 31. decembra 2006 .
Member States shall adopt the measures necessary to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision no later than 31 December 2006.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem okvirnim sklepom , v enem letu po njegovem sprejetju .
Member States shall adopt the measures necessary to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision within one year of its adoption.
Roki, ki so bili sprva priporočeni, trenutno niso uresničljivi.
The time limits which were originally recommended are not realistic currently.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki jih Komisiji sporoči generalni sekretariat Sveta, Komisija najpozneje do 31. decembra 2007 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o izvajanju tega okvirnega sklepa, po potrebi skupaj z zakonodajnimi predlogi.
On the basis of that information the Commission shall, no later than 31 December 2007 present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Framework Decision, accompanied if necessary by legislative proposals.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki jih Komisiji sporoči generalni sekretariat Sveta, Komisija najpozneje dve leti po sprejetju tega okvirnega sklepa Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o izvajanju tega okvirnega sklepa, po potrebi skupaj z zakonodajnimi predlogi.
On the basis of that information the Commission shall no later than two years after the adoption of this Framework Decision present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Framework Decision, accompanied if necessary by legislative proposals.
Zaradi skladnosti s predlogom spremembe k členu 7, odstavek 1.
To comply with the amendment for the Article 7 paragraph 1.
S predlaganim okvirnim sklepom se določi temelje, na katerih se bo obsodba, ki je bila izrečena v eni državi članici, morala upoštevati v novem kazenskem postopku v drugi državi članici, v katerem se obravnavajo druga dejstva.
The object of the proposed framework decision is to lay down the basis for a conviction handed down in one Member State to be taken into account in new criminal proceedings concerning different facts in another Member State.
Ta predlog je namenjen podpori sklepom iz Tampereja na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice.
This proposal is made in furtherance of the Tampere Conclusions in the field of freedom, security and justice.
Sklepi Evropskega sveta v Tampereju so načelo vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb postavili za temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja tako v civilnih kot v kazenskih zadevah.
The conclusions of the Tampere European Council presented the mutual recognition principle as the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in both civil and criminal matters.
Predlog, ki je v obravnavi, sodi v okvir bele knjige o izmenjavi podatkov o kazenskih obsodbah in njihovem učinku v Evropski uniji.
The proposal under consideration falls within the context of the White Paper on exchange of information on convictions and the effect of such convictions in the European Union.
Bela knjiga opredeljuje dva cilja bodočih dejavnosti Evropske unije: boljše razširjanje in uporabo podatkov ter zagotavljanje njihovega učinka zunaj države članice, ki je izrekla obsodbo, zlasti kot sredstvo za preprečevanje nadaljnjih kaznivih dejanj.
That White Paper defines the two objectives of future European Union action: improving the circulation and the use of information and ensuring that it can have an impact outside the convicting State, in particular as a means of preventing further offences.
Obsodb se v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije še nekaj časa ne bo izrekalo na bolj ali manj podoben način po postopkovni, dokazni in vsebinski plati.
There is a long way to go until justice is procedurally, evidentially and substantially administered in a more or less similar way in all the Member States of the European Union.
Navkljub obstoječim razlikam med nacionalnimi pravosodnimi sistemi, pa je treba v največji možni meri uveljaviti vzajemno priznavanje sodb med državami članicami.
Despite however the present diversities of the national systems of justice, the mutual recognition of judgements between Member States has to be pushed forward as much as possible.
To je seveda le ena stran, ki bo postala učinkovita, ko bo urejena tudi druga stran, to je evidentiranje in izmenjava informacij.
This is, of course, the one side of the coin which will be effective when the other side, that is to say, the recording and exchanging of information, is regulated.
Po mnenju poročevalca bi bilo torej bolje, če bi okvirni sklep stopil v veljavo, ko bo sprejet podoben sklep za urejanje področja evidentiranja in izmenjave podatkov o obsodbah na ozemlju Evropske unije.
It is, therefore, the rapporteur´s view that this framework decision is better to become in force when a similar decision is taken regulating the registration and circulation of information on convictions in the territory of the Union.
Pričujoči predlog je tesno povezan s Predlogom okvirnega sklepa Sveta o pripravi in vsebini izmenjave podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence, med državami članicami ( KOM(2005)0690 ).
This proposal is closely linked to the proposal for a Council Framework decision on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from the criminal records between Member States (COM(2005)690).
Namen predloga je torej določiti okoliščine, v katerih se obsodbe neke osebe, ki so izrečene v eni državi članici, upoštevajo v novem kazenskem postopku proti njej za druga dejstva.
The purpose of this proposal therefore is to lay down the situations is which convictions against a person which are taken in one Member State can or may be taken into account in course of new criminal proceeding against the same person for different facts.
Osnova za upoštevanje je „načelo vključitve“.
The basis for the taking into account is the principle of assimilation.
Glede opredelitve izraza „obsodba“ poročevalec meni, da uporaba fraze „pritožba pred organom, pristojnim zlasti za kazenske zadeve“ [ "appealed against in criminal courts" ] ne ustreza pravosodnim sistemom držav članic in utegne povzročati nejasnosti.
With regard to the definition of the term "conviction" the rapporteur believes that the use of the phrase "appealed against in criminal courts" does not seem to correspond to the judicial systems of the member states and may create confusion.
Poleg tega po mnenju poročevalca upravnih odločitev ne bi smeli vključiti v začetno fazo vzpostavljanja sistema sodelovanja, saj je to nepotrebno.
The rapporteur further feels that at these first stages of establishment of this system of cooperation, administrative decisions should not be included, as it is unnecessary.
V zvezi s členi 3, 4 in 5 je poročevalec naklonjen načelu preproste vključitve z nekaterimi elementi usklajevanja.
In relation to Articles 3, 4 and 5 the rapporteur is in favour of the principle of the simple assimilation together with some elements of harmonisation.
Predlaga preoblikovanje besedila prvega odstavka tretjega člena, kjer bi bilo izrecno navedeno, da je nacionalna zakonodaja edino merilo za odločanje, ali in v kakšni meri prejšnje obsodbe v tujini nosijo pravni učinek.
In this regard, the rapporteur proposes to redraft the wording of the Article 3 paragraph 1 to explicitly state that the only criteria for deciding if and to what extend legal effects should be attached to the previous foreign conviction is a national law.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba po vsej Evropski uniji upoštevati temeljna načela, med katera sodijo ne bis in idem , zastaranje, amnestija in izbris sklicevanja na obsodbo v nacionalni kazenski evidenci, zaradi česar se mora ohraniti člen 4.
However, the basic principles such as ne bis in idem , statutory limitation, amnesty as well as deletion of a reference to the conviction in the national criminal record should be observed throughout the European Union and, the Article 4, therefore, should be kept.
Nadalje bi moralo biti izrecno navedeno, da se med kazenskim postopkom v državi članici ne sme upoštevati obsodbe v tujini, povezane z dejanji, ki v tej državi članici niso kazniva.
Furthermore, it should be explicitly stated that, in the course of criminal proceedings in a Member State, account must not be taken of a foreign conviction related to acts not punishable in that Member State.
Poleg tega, določbe iz člena 6, po mnenju poročevalca, sodijo bolj v Predlog okvirnega sklepa Sveta o pripravi in vsebini izmenjave podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence, med državami članicami ( KOM(2005)0690 ).
Further, according to the rapporteur, the provisions of Article 6 best belong in the proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from the criminal records between Member States (COM(2005)690).
V zvezi s predlaganim besedilom člena 7 poročevalec meni, da ga je treba spremeniti, saj po mednarodnem pravu najbrž ni mogoče utemeljiti, da podpisnice neke konvencije enostransko spreminjajo ali nadomeščajo njene člene.
In relation to the proposed wording of Article 7, the rapporteur feels that it needs to be amended because it does not seem valid under international law that signatories of a Convention effect amendments or replacements of its Articles unilaterally.
Predlagana sprememba besedila člena 7 je bolj v skladu z mednarodnim pravom.
The text proposed in substitution of Article 7 is more in line with international law.
Predlog Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o upoštevanju obsodb med državami članicami Evropske unije v novem kazenskem postopku
Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings
o napredku Turčije za pristop
on Turkey's progress towards accession
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................18
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY...19
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o spremljanju napredka Turčije ( KOM(2005)0561 ),
– having regard to the Turkey 2005 Progress Report of the Commission ( COM(2005)0561 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 28. septembra 2005 o začetku pogajanj s Turčijo
– having regard to its resolution of 28 September 2005 on the opening of negotiations with Turkey
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2005)0350 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0350 . ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 16. marca 2006 o strateškem dokumentu Komisije o napredku v procesu širitve ( 2005/2206(INI) )
– having regard to its resolution of 16 March 2006 on the Commission's 2005 enlargement strategy paper ( 2005/2206(INI) )
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0096 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0096 . ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 15. decembra 2004 o rednem poročilu za leto 2004 in priporočilu Evropske komisije o napredku Turčije za pristop
– having regard to its resolution of 15 December 2004 on the 2004 regular report and the recommendation of the European Commission on Turkey's progress towards accession
UL C 226 E, 15.9.2005, str.
OJ C 226 E, 15.9.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 6. julija 2005 o vlogi žensk v Turčiji
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2005 on the role of women in Turkey
– ob upoštevanju pogajalskega okvira za Turčijo z dne 3. oktobra 2005,
– having regard to the Negotiating Framework with Turkey of 3 October 2005,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta 2006/35/ES z dne 23. januarja 2006 o načelih, prednostnih nalogah in pogojih iz Partnerstva za pristop s Turčijo
– having regard to Council Decision 2006/35/EC of 23 January 2006 on the principles, priorities and conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with Turkey
UL L 22, 26.1.2006, str.
OJ L 22, 26.1.2006, p.
34. , v katerem so opredeljene kratkoročne in dolgoročne prednostne naloge,
34. , setting out short-term and medium-term priorities,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 389/2006 z dne 27. februarja 2006 o oblikovanju instrumenta finančne podpore za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja turške skupnosti na Cipru
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 389/2006 of 27 February 2006 establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot Community
UL L 65, 7.3.2006, str.
OJ L 65, 7.3.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju turške izjave o Cipru z dne 29. julija 2005, izjave Sveta z dne 21. septembra 2005 in turškega akcijskega načrta, objavljenega januarja 2006,
– having regard to Turkey's Declaration with regard to Cyprus of 29 July 2005, the Council's Declaration of 21 September 2005 and Turkey's Action Plan of 24 January 2006,
– ob upoštevanju pogajalskega izhodišča Evropske unije, predloženega ob 45. zasedanju pridružitvenega sveta ES – Turčija 12. junija 2006,
– having regard to the position paper of the European Union tabled on the occasion of the 45th meeting of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 12 June 2006,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta z dne 15. in 16. junija 2006,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council, 15-16 June 2006,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6–0269/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0269/2006 ),
A. ker je Svet 3. oktobra 2005 odobril okvir za pogajanja s Turčijo o njenem pristopu k EU in tako omogočil začetek pogajanj takoj po zasedanju in ker Komisija trenutno izvaja uradni postopek preučitve uvajanja pravnega reda Skupnosti, pri katerem je bil na področju nekaterih politik dosežen napredek, eno poglavje, in sicer „znanost in raziskave”, pa je bilo že odprto in začasno zaprto na pristopni konferenci 12. junija 2006,
A. whereas on 3 October 2005 the Council approved a framework for negotiations with Turkey on its accession to the EU, thus enabling the negotiations to begin immediately after that meeting, and whereas the Commission is currently undertaking a formal process of examination of the acquis, which is advancing in certain policy areas, and one chapter, "Science and Research", has been opened and provisionally closed during the Accession Conference of 12 June 2006,
B. ker bo napredek pogajanj odvisen od uresničevanja prednostnih nalog iz partnerstva za pristop in zahtev iz pogajalskega okvira ter od doslednega izpolnjevanja določb iz pridružitvenega sporazuma (Sporazuma iz Ankare) in dodatnega protokola k sporazumu, vključno s celostnimi rešitvami mejnih sporov in ciprskega vprašanja, s katerimi bi se strinjale obe strani na otoku,
B. whereas the advancement of the negotiations will have to depend on the accomplishment of the priorities set out in the Accession Partnership, the requirements of the Negotiation Framework and the full implementation of the provisions stemming from the Association Agreement (Ankara Agreement) and the Additional Protocol thereto, including a comprehensive settlement of border disputes and a comprehensive settlement regarding Cyprus, to be supported by both sides of the island,
C. ker je bilo izpolnjevanje kopenhagenskih meril od vedno osnova za pristop k EU in bi moralo tako ostati tudi pri bodočih pristopih,
C. whereas compliance with all the Copenhagen criteria has always been the basis for accession to the EU and should remain so for future accessions,
D. ker je Evropski parlament v svojih resolucijah s 15. decembra 2004 in z 28. septembra 2005 sprejel odločitev, da je začetek pristopnih pogajanj priporočljiv, v kolikor velja dogovor, da se v prvem obdobju pogajanj pozornost nameni doslednemu izpolnjevanju političnih kriterijev, da se pred vsakim srečanjem v okviru pogajanj na ministrski ravni oceni politične kriterije, in to ne le v teoriji, temveč tudi v praksi, s čimer bodo turške oblasti pod učinkovitim in stalnim pritiskom, da ohranjajo tempo pri izvajanju potrebnih reform, ter da se določi celosten program z jasnimi cilji, časovnimi okvirji in roki za izpolnitev političnih kriterijev,
D. whereas the European Parliament decided in its resolutions of 15 December 2004 and 28 September 2005 that the opening of accession negotiations is to be recommended so long as it is agreed that, in the first phase of the negotiations, priority is given to the full implementation of the political criteria, that each session of the negotiations at ministerial level is to be preceded by an assessment of the political criteria not only in theory but also in practice, thus exerting effective and permanent pressure on the Turkish authorities to maintain the pace of the necessary reforms, and that a full programme of clear targets, timeframes and deadlines should be fixed for the fulfilment of the political criteria,
E. ker mora EU še naprej nadzorovati obseg reform in njihovo izvajanje in to ob upoštevanju dejstva, da mora biti želja po uspešni izvedbi reform v turški vladi in družbi močno zasidrana, saj je le tako mogoče doseči trajnost in nepovratnost reformnega procesa,
E. whereas, whilst recognising that the impetus for successful reform must be firmly rooted in Turkish government and society, so as to guarantee the sustainability and the irreversibility of the reform process, the EU should continue to monitor the scope of reforms and their implementation,
F. ker je Komisija v svojem poročilu o napredku ugotovila, da se je uvajanje sprememb v zadnjem letu upočasnilo, da je njihovo izvajanje neenakomerno in da so potrebni precejšnji dodatni napori na področju temeljnih svoboščin in človekovih pravic, še zlasti kar zadeva svobodo izražanja, pravice žensk, versko svobodo, sindikalne pravice, politične svoboščine, manjšinske pravice ter jezikovne in kulturne pravice in okrepljen boj proti mučenju in slabem ravnanju, ter da morajo državne službe hitro in ustrezno izvrševati sklepe sodišč,
F. whereas the Commission has concluded in its Progress Report that the pace of change slowed last year, that implementation remains uneven and that significant further efforts are required as regards fundamental freedoms and human rights, in particular freedom of expression, women's rights, religious freedoms, trade union rights, political freedoms, minority rights, language and cultural rights, and the further strengthening of the fight against torture and ill-treatment, and the swift and correct enforcement of court rulings by State services,
H. ker Turčija navkljub številnim pozivom Evropskega parlamenta in več držav članic še vedno ni priznala genocida nad armenskim narodom,
H. whereas Turkey has still not acknowledged the genocide perpetrated against the Armenians despite numerous calls from the European Parliament and several Member States,
I. ker je treba pri oblikovanju nove zakonodaje za boj proti terorizmu natančno upoštevati mednarodne konvencije za odpravo terorizma,
I. whereas international conventions for the elimination of terrorism should be carefully taken into account when drafting new legislation against terrorism,
L. ker ni bil od zadnjega poročila Parlamenta dosežen nobene napredek pri reševanju težav verskih manjšin in ker pričakovani zakon o verskih skupnostih, ki čaka na obravnavo v turškem parlamentu, kot kaže, ne odpravlja vseh pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih v prejšnjem osnutku, med drugimi pri vprašanjih zasega premoženja verskih ustanov, pravne osebe, pravice do usposabljanja duhovnikov in notranjega upravljanja, in tako ne dosega standardov EU ter ne zadovoljuje pričakovanj verskih skupnosti in nevladnih organizacij na splošno, ki so sicer potrebne za obstoj raznolike in neodvisne civilne družbe,
L. whereas no progress has been made since Parliament’s last report in addressing the difficulties faced by religious minorities, and whereas the expected Law on Foundations pending in the Turkish Parliament does not seem to remove all the shortcomings identified in the previous draft, such as the seizure of assets belonging to religious foundations, legal personality, the right to training of clergy and internal management, thus falling short of EU standards and the expectations both of religious communities and generally of non-governmental organisations necessary for a diverse and independent civil society,
M. ker protokol Emasya, ki sta ga leta 1997 podpisala vrhovno poveljstvo in notranje ministrstvo, pod določenimi pogoji dovoljuje vojaške operacije, kadar je ogrožena notranja varnost,
M. whereas the “Emasya” Protocol signed in 1997 between the General Staff and the Ministry of the Interior allows, under certain conditions, for military operations to be conducted when internal security matters are at stake,
O. ker pogumnim in obetajočim besedam, ki jih je v zvezi s kurdskim vprašanjem lani izrekel premier Erdogan, niso sledila konkretna dejanja,
O. whereas a courageous and promising signal given last year by Prime Minister Erdogan, in which he addressed the Kurdish issue, has not yet been followed by substantial actions,