natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dostopu služb držav članic, pristojnih za izdajo potrdil o registraciji vozil, do druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) KOM(2005)0237 – COD 2005/0010.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding access to the Second Generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) by the services in the Member States responsible for issuing vehicle registration certificates COM/2005/0237 final - COD 2005/0010.
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) KOM(2005)0230 – CNS 2005/0103. , načelu dostopnosti
Proposal for a Council Decision on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen information system (SIS II) COM/2005/0230 final - CNS 2005/0103. , the principle of availability
Predlog Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o izmenjavi informacij v skladu z načelom dostopnosti ( SEC(2005)1270 ) – KOM(2005)0490 – CNS 2005/0207. in interoperabilnosti evropskih baz podatkov na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev
Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the exchange of information under the principle of availability {SEC(2005) 1270} COM/2005/0490 final - CNS 2005/0207. and interoperability of European data in the area of JHA
Sporočilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o izboljšani učinkovitosti, povečani interoperabilnosti in sinergijah med evropskimi zbirkami podatkov na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev KOM(2005)0597 . , ker ti predvidevajo podatkovne banke ali ukrepe, ki pristojnim organom omogočajo dostop do osebnih podatkov.
Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on improved effectiveness, enhanced interoperability and synergies among European databases in the area of Justice and Home Affairs COM(2005)0597 final. , since these provide for databases or measures facilitating access by the competent authorities to personal data.
Tudi predlogi Skupnosti v zvezi z VIS in SIS II vključujejo predlog v zvezi s tretjim stebrom, da bi predvideli dostop do podatkov policijskih in pravosodnih organov in njihovo uporabo.
The Community proposals on VIS and SIS II, for example, also include a proposal under the third pillar to provide for data access and use by the police and judicial authorities.
Predlogi se morajo v prihodnje jasno sklicevati na načela predlaganega okvirnega sklepa v zvezi z varstvom osebnih podatkov.
These proposals should include clear references to the principles of personal data protection set out in the present framework decision.
Zato je treba ta okvirni sklep sprejeti hkrati s predlogi o SIS II.
It is for this reason that the framework decision should be adopted at the same time as the proposals on SIS II.
Predlog okvirnega sklepa se sklicuje tudi na načelo dostopnosti, za katerega velja, da „naj bi informacije, potrebne za boj proti kriminalu, prosto prehajale notranje meje“ z „neposredni[m] spletni[m] dostop[om] organov kazenskega pregona držav članic in uradnikov Europola“.
The proposal for a framework decision also refers to the availability principle, the aim of which is 'that the information needed to combat crime should cross internal borders unimpeded via direct on-line access for the Member States’ law-enforcement services and Europol agents'.
Vendar se pojavljata dve oviri za dostopnost podatkov:
Two obstacles to availability of data are noted, however:
Sprejetje skupnih pravil o varstvu podatkov, če imajo ti varnostne namene, je zato predpogoj tudi za vzpostavitev načela o dostopnosti.
The adoption of common rules on protection of data where the latter is intended for security purposes is also, therefore, a sine qua non for establishing the availability principle.
Vendarle pa sprejetje okvirnega sklepa, čeprav je bistvenega pomena za dobro delovanje načela o dostopnosti, ne sme prejudicirati izidov razprave o tem vprašanju.
Of course, while the success of the availability principle is dependent upon adoption of the present framework decision, the latter should nevertheless be adopted without prejudging the outcome of the discussions on the availability principle.
Prve smernice poročevalca
Initial response of the rapporteur
Zagotoviti moramo skladnost in enotnost načel varstva podatkov v Evropski uniji, vključno med prvim in tretjim stebrom.
We must ensure that there is coherence and uniformity in the principles of data protection in the European Union, inter alia between the first and third pillars.
Načela, določena v Direktivi 95/46/ES, morajo tvoriti trdno jedro evropske zakonodaje in določati splošna načela o varstvu podatkov.
The principles set out in Directive 95/46/EC should constitute the core of European law on this subject and lay down the general principles of data protection.
Kot poročevalka želim v tretjem stebru čim bolj okrepiti načela o varstvu podatkov, ki jih določajo direktive Skupnosti za zagotovitev enakih standardov varstva ob upoštevanju posebnosti policijskega in pravosodnega dela.
As rapporteur, I would like to incorporate in the third pillar to as great an extent as possible the principles of data protection established by the Community directives, in order to guarantee the same level of protection, while taking account also of the special nature of police and judicial work.
Zato je treba določbo direktive 95/46/ES ob predvidevanju dodatnih pravil v zvezi s pristojnostjo pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah dopolniti z ohranjanjem skladnosti s splošnimi načeli, ki jih določa zakonodaja Skupnosti.
The rules contained in Directive 95/46/EC must, for example, be supplemented with rules in the area of judicial and police cooperation on criminal matters, while maintaining coherence with the general principles established by Community law.
Zato se zdi nujno, da skupna pravila o varstvu podatkov veljajo za vse podatke na policijskem in pravosodnem področju ter se ne omejujejo na čezmejne izmenjave med državami članicami.
In order to do this, it is essential that the common rules on data protection should apply to all data in the police and judicial areas, and not be limited to cross-border exchanges between Member States.
Rada bi zagotovila obsežno področje uporabe okvirnega sklepa, zato da bi se pravila Skupnosti upoštevala tudi pri obdelavi podatkov znotraj držav članic.
I would like to support a broad field of application for the framework decision, so that the European rules will also be applied to processing data within the Member States.
Europol, Eurojust in carinski informacijski sistem so izključeni iz predloga okvirnega sklepa, ker imajo svoja pravila o varstvu podatkov.
Europol, Eurojust and the customs information system are excluded from the proposals for a framework decision because they have their own data protection rules.
Da se zagotovi skladnost pravil, želim s tem okvirnim sklepom spodbujati zbliževanje pravil omenjenih organov, vključno z agencijami in drugimi organi Unije.
In order to ensure that there is coherence among the data protection rules, including those applying to the agencies and bodies set up by the Union, I wish to encourage convergence between the specific rules of those bodies and this framework decision.
Zato predlagam k končnim določbam nov člen, ki od Komisije zahteva, da v roku dveh let predloži predlog za uvedbo pravil o zaščiti podatkov pri delovanju Europola, Eurojusta in carinskega informacijskega sistema.
I therefore propose adding a new article in the ‘Final Provisions’ calling on the Commission to submit a proposal within two years with a view to making the rules on data protection applicable to Europol, Eurojust and the customs information system.
Pridobivanje podatkov mora biti omejeno za posebne namene ter mora upoštevati načela sorazmernosti in potrebe.
Data collection must be limited to specific purposes and must be carried out in accordance with the principles of proportionality and necessity.
Vsaka nadaljnja obdelava podatkov mora potekati po določenih pravilih, nadaljnji prenos v namene, za katere podatki niso bili zbrani prvotno, pa mora biti strogo omejen.
For example, any subsequent processing of the data must comply with precise rules, and subsequent transfer for purposes other than those for which the data were collected must be strictly limited.
Predlagam oblikovanje novega člena, ki bi opredelil nadaljnjo obdelavo.
I propose drafting a new article defining subsequent treatment.
Predlagam tudi, da bi v člen 7 vključili ukrep o samodejnem izbrisu osebnih podatkov po določenem času.
I also propose inserting in Article 7 a measure providing for automatic deletion of personal data after a fixed period.
Različne vrste podatkov (osumljenci, obsojenci, žrtve, priče itd.) se obdelajo različno in s posebnimi varnostnimi ukrepi.
The different categories of data (relating to suspects, convicted people, victims, witnesses etc.) are treated differently, with specific safeguards.
Treba je natančno določiti, da je mogoče podatke, povezane z osebami, ki niso osumljene, uporabiti le za namene, za katere so bili zbrani.
I therefore propose adding a paragraph to Article 4 stipulating that data relating to people who are not under suspicion should be used solely for the purposes for which they were collected.
Dodatne varnostne ukrepe je treba dodati zaradi podatkov o DNA in biometričnih podatkov, da se zagotovi njihova kakovost in spoštovanje temeljnih pravic pri njihovi uporabi.
Additional safeguards must be added to Article 6 to cover DNA and biometric data in order to guarantee the safety and quality of the data and compliance with fundamental rights in using them.
S tem instrumentom je mogoče določiti dostop pristojnih organov do podatkov.
This instrument enables us to define access to data by the competent authorities.
Zato moramo določiti dostop do shranjenih podatkov zasebnih strank, kot v primeru direktive o hrambi podatkov.
In it we must define access to data kept by private parties, as is done in the directive on data retention.
Podrobno smo določili, da bo dostop do podatkov določen glede na posamezen primer, za določen cilj in pod pravosodnim nadzorom držav članic.
I therefore propose that a new article be inserted after Article 14 specifying that access to these data is to be granted on a case-by-case basis, for a specific purpose and under the judicial control of the Member States.
V zvezi z vlogo zasebnih strank pri upravljanju in obdelavi podatkov v okviru javnega položaja in za varnostne namene predlagam, da za te dejavnosti veljajo zelo strogi pogoji, ki jih predvideva nacionalna zakonodaja in urejajo kazenske sankcije.
As regards the role of private parties in the management and processing of data for security purposes within a public service, I propose that these activities be made subject to very strict conditions laid down in national law and subject to penal sanctions.
Prvič, podatki bodo poslani v tretje države le, če te zagotavljajo ustrezne standarde varstva podatkov.
Firstly, data will be transferred to a third country only if the latter guarantees an adequate level of protection for the data.
Drugič, kakovost prejetih podatkov tretje države bo ocenjena, vključno ob upoštevanju temeljnih pravic.
Secondly, the quality of data received from a third country will be assessed, inter alia in the light of fundamental rights.
Evropski organi ne bodo uporabili podatkov, pridobljenih z mučenjem.
No data obtained by torture, for example, will be used by the European authorities.
Dodajamo vprašanje dostopa in samodejnih odločitev, kot v primeru drugih aktov varstva podatkov.
We must add the questions of access and of automated decisions to the framework decision, as is done in other data protection instruments.
Vsekakor vedno večje število evropskih podatkovnih bank omogoča avtomatski dostop organov do podatkov, ki so jih zbrali organi druge države članice.
The growing number of European databases means that authorities in one Member State can automatically access data collected by those in another.
Vendar avtomatski dostop ne sme ogrožati temeljnih pravic.
But this automatic access must not jeopardise fundamental rights.
Zato predlagam, da bi vključili nov člen, v skladu s katerim se odločitve, ki vpliva na posameznika, ne bi smelo sprejeti le na podlagi avtomatizirane obdelave zadevnih podatkov.
I therefore propose inserting a new article stipulating that a decision having an effect on an individual may not be taken on the sole basis of automated processing of data pertaining to them.
Dostop do baz podatkov in njihovo uporabo morajo pristojni organi pregona izvajati v skladu z načeli in določbami predlaganega okvirnega sklepa.
In addition, I would like to use amendments to clarify that access to and use of these databases by the competent law-enforcement authorities must be governed by the principles and provisions of the framework decision.
Predlog Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah
Proposal for a Council framework decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi posebnega programa „Boj proti nasilju (Daphne) ter preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje“ za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2007-2013 the specific programme "Fight against violence (Daphne) and drugs prevention and information" as part of the General programme "Fundamental Rights and Justice"
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 30
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 4
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0122 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0122 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 152 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0388/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 152 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0388/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ter mnenj Odbora za Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6–0193/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0193/2006 ),
3. poziva Komisijo, da zadevo ponovno predloži Parlamentu, če namerava predlog bistveno spremeniti ali ga nadomestiti z drugim besedilom;
Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to the Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi posebnega programa „Boj proti nasilju (Daphne) ter preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje“ za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“
Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing for the period 2007-2013 the specific programme "Fight against violence (Daphne) and drugs prevention and information" as part of the General programme "Fundamental Rights and Justice"
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi posebnega programa za preprečevanje nasilja nad otroki, mladimi in ženskami in boj proti njemu ter za zaščito žrtev in ogroženih skupin (Daphne III ) za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“
Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing for the period 2007-2013 the specific programme to prevent and combat violence against children, young people and women and to protect victims and groups at risk (Daphne III ) as part of the General programme "Fundamental Rights and Justice"
Ta sprememba velja za celotno zakonodajno besedilo; sprejetje tega predloga spremembe pomeni, da bodo v celotnem besedilu potrebne tehnične prilagoditve.
This amendment applies to the entire legislative text; the adoption of this amendment means that technical adjustments throughout the text will be necessary
Zaradi pomena in različnih značilnosti ukrepov Skupnosti glede boja proti nasilju ter preprečevanja uporabe drog in obveščanja, teh vprašanj ne more obravnavati le en poseben program „Boj proti nasilju (Daphne) ter preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje“, ampak dva posebna, ločena programa: „Daphne III" in „Preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje".
Owing to the importance and different characteristics of the Community measures concerning fight against violence and drugs prevention and information, those issues should not be dealt within a single specific programme "Fight against violence (Daphne) and drugs prevention and information" but rather in two separate specific programmes: "Daphne III" and "Drugs prevention and information".
Komisija je potrdila, da se strinja s tem pristopom in bo upoštevala predloge sprememb, ki so namenjeni ločitvi njenega predloga na dva sklepa.
The Commission has confirmed that it is open to this approach and will consider amendments aiming at splitting its proposal in two decisions.
(2) Dejavnost Skupnosti bi morala dopolnjevati nacionalne politike, usmerjene k izboljševanju javnega zdravja, odpravljanju vzrokov, ki ogrožajo zdravje ljudi, in zmanjševanju škode za zdravje zaradi odvisnosti od drog .
(2) Community action should complement national policies directed towards improving public health, obviating sources of danger to human health and reducing health-related harm associated with drug dependence .
(2) Dejavnost Skupnosti bi morala dopolnjevati nacionalne politike, usmerjene k izboljševanju javnega zdravja, odpravljanju vzrokov, ki ogrožajo zdravje ljudi, in zmanjševanju škode za zdravje.
(2) Community action should complement national policies directed towards improving public health, obviating sources of danger to human health and reducing health-related harm.
Nadaljevanje predloga spremembe 1.
Follows on from amendment 1
(3) Fizično, spolno in psihično nasilje nad otroki, mladimi in ženskami, vključno z grožnjami s tovrstnimi dejanji, prisilo ali samovoljnim odvzemom prostosti, ki se pojavlja v javnem ali zasebnem življenju, predstavlja kršitev njihovih pravic do življenja, varnosti, svobode, dostojanstva ter telesne in čustvene celovitosti, pa tudi ogroženost za telesno in duševno zdravje žrtev takega nasilja.
(3) Physical, sexual and psychological violence against children, young people and women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or private life, constitute a breach of their right to life, safety, freedom, dignity and physical and emotional integrity and a serious threat to the physical and mental health of the victims of such violence.
Učinki takega nasilja so tako razširjeni po Skupnosti, da predstavljajo resnično nevarnost za zdravje in ovirajo uživanje varnega, svobodnega in pravičnega državljanstva.
The effects of such violence, being so widespread throughout the Community, constitute a genuine health scourge and an obstacle to the enjoyment of safe, free and just citizenship.
(3) Fizično, spolno in psihično nasilje nad otroki, mladimi in ženskami, vključno z grožnjami s tovrstnimi dejanji, prisilo ali samovoljnim odvzemom prostosti, ki se pojavlja v javnem ali zasebnem življenju, še zlasti pa trgovina z ljudmi in prisilna prostitucija predstavljajo kršitev njihovih pravic do življenja, varnosti, svobode, dostojanstva ter telesne in čustvene celovitosti, pa tudi ogroženost za telesno in duševno zdravje žrtev takega nasilja.
(3) Physical, sexual and psychological violence against children, young people and women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or private life, and, in particular, trafficking in human beings and enforced prostitution, constitute a breach of their right to life, safety, freedom, dignity and physical and emotional integrity and a serious threat to the physical and mental health of the victims of such violence.
Učinki takega nasilja so tako razširjeni po Skupnosti, da predstavljajo resnično kršitev človekovih pravic in nevarnost za zdravje in ovirajo uživanje varnega, svobodnega in pravičnega državljanstva.
The effects of such violence, being so widespread throughout the Community, constitute a genuine human rights violation and health scourge and an obstacle to the enjoyment of safe, free and just citizenship.
Nasilje je tudi in predvsem kršitev človekovih pravic.
Violence is also and primarily a human rights violation.
(3a) Tradicija in kulturni običaji, povezani z izvajanjem fizičnega nasilja nad ženskami, kot so pohabljanje genitalij in zločini iz časti, so posebna oblika nasilja nad ženskami, ki imajo kratkoročne in dolgoročne posledice za njihovo zdravje, njihove glavne žrtve pa so pripadnice manjšin.
(3a) Traditions and cultural practices associated with the exercise of physical violence against women, such as genital mutilation and honour crimes, constitute a particular form of violence against women with short-term and long-term detrimental effects on their health, the main victims being members of minority communities.
Nasilje nad ženskami v nobenem primeru ne more biti upravičeno kot del kulturne tradicije ali običajev, ampak mora biti prepoznano za obliko nasilja.
Violence against women must not under any circumstances be justified as part of a cultural tradition or practice but should be recognised as a form of violence.
(6) Listina Evropske Unije o temeljnih pravicah med drugim znova potrjuje pravico do dostojanstva, enakosti in solidarnosti.
(6) The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union reaffirms, inter alia, the rights to dignity, equality and solidarity.
Listina vključuje številne posebne določbe za varovanje in spodbujanje telesne in duševne celovitosti, enako obravnavanje moških in žensk, pravic otrok in nediskriminacije, pa tudi za prepoved nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja, suženjstva in prisilnega dela ter dela otrok.
It includes a number of specific provisions to protect and promote physical and mental integrity, equal treatment for men and women, the rights of the child and non-discrimination, as well as to prohibit inhuman or degrading treatment, slavery and forced labour, and child labour.
Listina potrjuje, da se pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju vseh politik in ukrepov Skupnosti zagotavlja visoka raven varovanja zdravja ljudi.
It reaffirms that a high level of human health protection shall be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities.
(6) Boj proti nasilju bi moral biti priznan v okviru zaščite temeljnih pravic, ki jih zagotavlja listina Evropske Unije o temeljnih pravicah , ki med drugim znova potrjuje pravico do dostojanstva, enakosti in solidarnosti.
(6) The fight against violence should be placed within the context of the protection of fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union , which reaffirms, inter alia, the rights to dignity, equality and solidarity.
Nasilje nad ljudmi je kršitev številnih temeljnih pravic, podanih v Listini temeljnih pravic Evropske unije.
Violence against people constitutes a breach of a number of the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Iz tega sledi, da bi bilo proti takšnemu nasilju ukrepati z vidika svobode do takšnih pravic, ki bi jih morale zagotavljati politični organi.
It follows, then, that action to combat such violence should be taken in the context of the freedom to enjoy such rights, which should be guaranteed by the political authorities.
Komisija mora upoštevati tudi zadnje resolucije Evropskega parlamenta.
The Commission should take in account also the latest Resolutions of the European Parliament.