natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4) Komisija vsako leto sestavi izbirni svet, ki predloži poročilo o nominaciji ali nominacijah, ocenjenih z vidika ciljev in značilnosti te aktivnosti.
4) The Commission shall each year form a selection panel which shall issue a report on the nomination or nominations judged against the objectives and characteristics of this action.
5) Izbirni svet sestavlja sedem neodvisnih vodilnih osebnosti, ki so strokovnjaki na kulturnem področju, od katerih dve imenuje Evropski parlament, dve Svet, dve Komisija in eno Odbor regij.
5) The selection panel shall be composed of seven leading independent personalities who are experts on the cultural sector, of whom two shall be appointed by the European Parliament, two by the Council, two by the Commission and one by the Committee of the Regions.
6) Izbirni svet predloži svoje poročilo Komisiji, Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
6) The selection panel shall submit its report to the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council.
7) Evropski parlament lahko Komisiji pošlje mnenje o nominaciji ali nominacijah najpozneje tri mesece po prejemu poročila.
7) The European Parliament may forward an opinion to the Commission on the nomination or nominations not later than three months after receipt of the report.
8) Svet, ki deluje v skladu s priporočilom Komisije, sestavljenem ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta in poročila izbirnega sveta, uradno imenuje zadevno mesto za Evropsko prestolnico kulture za tisto leto, za katerega je bilo nominirano.
8) The Council, acting on a recommendation from the Commission drawn up in the light of the opinion of the European Parliament and of the selection panel's report, shall officially designate the city in question as a European Capital of Culture for the year for which it has been nominated.
9) Nominacija vključuje kulturni program, ki temelji na merilih iz člena 3.
9) The nomination shall include a cultural programme based on the criteria laid down in Article 3 .
Z odstopanjem od člena 3(3) se morajo merila iz člena 3 in Priloge II sklepa št. 1419/1999/ES, kakor je bil spremenjen s sklepom št. 649/2005/ES, uporabiti v primeru Evropskih prestolnic kulture za leta 2010, 2011 in 2012, razen če se zadevno mesto odloči, da bo svoj program sestavilo po merilih iz člena 3(3).
By way of derogation from Article 3(3), the criteria set out in Article 3 and Annex II to Decision No 1419/1999/EC, as amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC, shall apply in the case of Capitals of Culture for 2010, 2011 and 2012, unless the city in question decides to base its programme on the criteria set out in Article 3(3).
To se bo zgodilo, kot navaja člen, če bodo mesta izpolnjevala merila „evropske razsežnosti“, vsebovana v členu 3(3) in če bodo izvajala priporočila izbirnega sveta ter nadzornega in svetovalnega odbora.
This is provided that, as noted in Article the cities meet the 'European dimension' criteria laid down in Article 3(3) and have implemented the recommendations made by the selection and monitoring and advisory panels.
Vendar morajo mesta dobiti zagotovilo, da bodo, če bodo izpolnila omenjene zahteve, sredstva, namenjena kulturnemu programu, v resnici prejela (kar je bolje, kot da o tem po svoji presoji odloča ES).
However, cities should have the certainty that, provided they meet these requirements, they will receive funding under the Culture Programme (rather than this being left at the EC's discretion).
Člen 13.2 - medtem ko členi od 4 do 8 obravnavajo izbirne postopke, pa člen 3 navaja dodatne zahteve, ki vplivajo na te postopke.
Art. 13.2 - while Articles 4 to 8 cover the selection procedures, there are additional requirements in Article 3 which have an affect on these selection procedures.
Zato mora biti jasno, da se bo vsako odstopanje nanašalo tudi na člen 3.
Therefore it should be clarified that any derogation should be extended to Article 3 as well.
Vendar bodo prestolnicama kulture za leti 2011 in 2012 še vseeno namenjeni novi postopki spremljanja in svetovanja.
However, 2011 and 2012 Capitals of Culture would still be subject to the new monitoring and advisory procedures.
Člen 13.3 - vsem prestolnicam kulture za leta 2010, 2011 in 2012 je treba omogočiti, da uporabijo postopke nadzornega in svetovalnega odbora v skladu z novim sklepom in postanejo tako upravičene do nagrade.
Art. 13.3 - the 2010, 2011 and 2012 CC should all benefit from the monitoring and advisory panel procedures under the new Decision, and as a result be eligible for a prize.
Vendar pa bo te prestolnice, glede na to, da bodo morale zaprositi za status prestolnic kulture na osnovi izpolnjevanja meril iz sedaj veljavnega sklepa iz leta 1999, težko oceniti po „novih“ merilih, ko bo zanje potekal nadzorni in svetovalni postopek.
However, as they will have to apply to become CC by demonstrating how they will meet the criteria set out in the current 1999 Decision, it could be difficult and confusing for these Capitals to be assessed against the 'new' criteria when undergoing the monitoring and advisory procedure.
Zato bo mesta sicer možno spodbujati, naj upoštevajo nova merila, težko pa jih bo v to prisiliti, če tega ne bodo želela.
Therefore, while cities could be encouraged to try to take into account the new criteria, it would be difficult to force cities to do so if they did not wish to.
Ta sklep se uporablja od 1. januarja 2007.
This Decision shall apply from 1st January 2007.
Ta sklep začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Decision shall enter in force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep se uporablja od 1. januarja 2007, z izjemo člena 4, ki se uporablja od datuma začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa.
It shall apply from 1st January 2007 , with the exception of Article 4, which shall apply from the date of entry into force of this Decision.
Pojasni začetek veljavnosti sklepa.
Clarifies entry into force of the decision.
Vrstni red kroga upravičencev pri nominiranju za „Evropsko prestolnico kulture“
Order of entitlement to nominate a “European Capital of Culture”
2008 Združeno kraljestvo
2008 United Kingdom
2009 Avstrija – Litva
2009 Austria - Lithuania
2010 Nemčija – Madžarska
2010 Germany - Hungary
2011 Finska – Estonija
2011 Finland - Estonia
2012 Portugalska – Slovenija
2012 Portugal - Slovenia
2013 Francija – Slovaška
2013 France - Slovakia
2014 Švedska – Latvija
2014 Sweden - Latvia
2015 Belgija – Češka republika
2015 Belgium - Czech Republic
2016 Španija – Poljska
2016 Spain - Poland
2017 Danska – Ciper
2017 Denmark - Cyprus
2018 Nizozemska – Malta
2018 Netherlands - Malta
Vrstni red kroga upravičencev pri nominiranju za „Evropsko prestolnico kulture“ 1
Order of entitlement to nominate a “European Capital of Culture" 1
2007 Luksemburg - Romunija 2
2007 Luxembourg - Romania 2
2019 Italija – Bolgarija
2019 Italy - Bulgaria 3
1 Irska je bila upravičena, da imenuje Evropsko prestolnico kulture za leto 2005, Grčija pa za leto 2006.
1 Ireland was entitled to nominate a “European Capital of Culture” in 2005, Greece in 2006.
2 V skladu s sklepom 1419/1999/ES je bilo romunsko mesto Sibiu nominirano za Evropsko prestolnico kulture za leto 2007.
2 Under the terms of Decision 1419/1999/EC, the Romanian city of Sibiu was designated as European capital of culture for the year 2007.
3 Glede na svoj pristop k EU bo Bolgarija sodelovala pri dogodku Evropska prestolnica kulture leta 2019.
3 Subject to accession to the EU, Bulgaria will participate in the European Capital of Culture event of 2019.
Prilogo je treba vključiti, kajti Sklep 649/2005/ES, ki določa seznam, bo z novim Sklepom razveljavljen.
The annex should be included as Decision 649/2005/EC which established the list will be repealed with the new Decision.
Ker se tako Romunija kot Bolgarija približujeta pristopu k EU, je pomembno zagotoviti, da se ju vključi v Prilogo, da bi se s tem izognili potrebi po nadaljnjem soodločanju (COD) o njuni vključitvi v seznam.
As Romania and Bulgaria are both nearing their accession to the EU, it is important to ensure their inclusion in the Annex to avoid the need for a further COD including them in the list.
Ker je Romunija kot tretja država že določena za gostiteljico dogodka Evropska prestolnica kulture 2007, ne bo možno imeti še ene prestolnice kulture, vendar besedilo izpostavlja Romunijo zato, ker naj bi postala država članica v teku leta 2007.
As Romania is already due to host a CC event in 2007 as a third country it will not be able to have an additional CC, but the text highlights Romania as it should become a MS during 2007.
Priloga dovoljuje Bolgariji, da sodeluje v letu 2019, vendar pojasnjuje, da ne bo mogla sodelovati, če pred letom 2019 ne bo pristopila k EU, kar pa je malo verjetno.
The Annex allows Bulgaria to participate in 2019, but makes clear it would not be able to participate in the unlikely event that it has not acceded to the EU before 2019.
Minority opinion by Mrs Erna Hennicot-Schoepges under Rule 48 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure
Minority opinion by Mrs Erna Hennicot-Schoepges under Rule 48 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure
Erna Hennicot-Schoepges draws attention to her amendments which were not adopted in the final vote final, and which aimed primarily to:
Erna Hennicot-Schoepges draws attention to her amendments which were not adopted in the final vote final, and which aimed primarily to:
· facilitate and simplify procedures by abolishing the role of the panel, leaving the Member States responsible for selecting and nominating the European capital of culture in accordance with their own criteria, and in full knowledge of the regional and local particularities of the various candidate cities;
· facilitate and simplify procedures by abolishing the role of the panel, leaving the Member States responsible for selecting and nominating the European capital of culture in accordance with their own criteria, and in full knowledge of the regional and local particularities of the various candidate cities;
· organise former European capitals of culture as a network for supporting future capitals of culture during the preparatory phase, on the basis of the experience they have gained in previous events, so as to ensure the European added value of the operation.
· organise former European capitals of culture as a network for supporting future capitals of culture during the preparatory phase, on the basis of the experience they have gained in previous events, so as to ensure the European added value of the operation.
Not wishing to oppose the consensus, she nevertheless underlines the risks inherent in the revised procedure: it is important to avoid the negative experience that Luxembourg went through during the procedure by a panel for selection as Capital of Culture 2007.
Not wishing to oppose the consensus, she nevertheless underlines the risks inherent in the revised procedure: it is important to avoid the negative experience that Luxembourg went through during the procedure by a panel for selection as Capital of Culture 2007.
When pronouncing judgment on the candidates’ initiatives, the panel will need to show a keen awareness of the sensibilities of those with whom it deals, and of the context of the region concerned, so as to aid cultural development rather than reward what already exists.
When pronouncing judgment on the candidates’ initiatives, the panel will need to show a keen awareness of the sensibilities of those with whom it deals, and of the context of the region concerned, so as to aid cultural development rather than reward what already exists.
Predlog Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi aktivnosti Skupnosti za dogodek Evropske prestolnice kulture za leta 2007 do 2019
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture for the years 2007 to 2019
o predlogu Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi poenostavljenega režima kontrole oseb na zunanjih mejah na podlagi enostranskega priznanja nekaterih dokumentov s strani Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške kot enakovrednih njihovim nacionalnim vizumom za namene tranzita preko njihovih ozemelj
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas for the purposes of transit through their territories
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu (KOM (2005)0381)
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0381 )
UL C ..., 4.1.2006, str. .... ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 62(2) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0253/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 62(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0253/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0062/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0062/2006 ),
(8) Izpolnjeni morajo biti pogoji za vstop, določeni v členu 5(1) Uredbe ES št. .../2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o vzpostavitvi kodeksa Skupnosti o predpisih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb preko meja (kodeksa o schengenskih mejah) , z izjemo člena 5(1)(b), dokler nove države članice s to odločbo ne vzpostavijo režima enostranskega priznanja nekaterih dokumentov, ki jih izdajo države članice, ki polno izvajajo schengenski pravni red, kakor tudi podobnih dokumentov, ki jih izdajo druge nove države članice za namen tranzita.
(8) The entry conditions laid down in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No .../2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) have to be fulfilled, with the exception of the condition laid down in Article 5(1)(b), insofar as this Decision sets up a regime of unilateral recognition by new Member States of certain documents issued by Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis and similar documents issued by other new Member States for the purpose of transit.
(9a) Ta odločba ne predstavlja razvoja schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije ter Republiko Islandijo in Kraljevino Norveško pridružitvi slednjih k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, saj je naslovljena le na države članice, ki schengenskega pravnega reda še ne izvajajo v celoti.
(9a) This Decision does not constitute a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, appli cati on and development of the Schengen acquis, as it is only addressed to Member States that do not yet fully implement the Schengen acquis.
Toda zaradi skladnosti in ustreznega delovanja schengenskega sistema zajema ta odločba tudi vizume in dovoljenja za prebivanje, ki jih izdajo tretje države, pridružene k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki polno izvajajo schengenski pravni red, kot sta Republika Islandija in Kraljevina Norveška.
However, for the coherence and proper functioning of the Schengen system, this Decision also covers visas and residence permits issued by third countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis and fully implementing the Schengen acquis, such as the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway.
(9a) V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ti državi članici ne sodelujeta pri sprejetju te odločbe.
(9a) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, those Member States are not taking part in the adoption of this Decision.
(9a) V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te odločbe.
(9b) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European community, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision.
Ta odločba uvaja poenostavljen režim kontrole oseb na zunanjih mejah na temelju dovoljenja Češki, Estoniji, Cipru, Latviji, Litvi, Madžarski, Malti, Poljski, Sloveniji, Slovaški (v nadaljnjem besedilu nove države članice), da za namen tranzita enostransko priznajo nekatere dokumente, ki jih izdajo države, ki polno izvajajo schengenski pravni red , in dokumente , ki jih izdajo druge nove države članice državljanom tretjih držav, ki morajo na podlagi Uredbe (ES) 539/2001 imeti vizum, kot enakovredne svojim nacionalnim vizumom.
This Decision introduces a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on allowing the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia , Slovakia, (hereinafter new Member States) to recognise unilaterally as equivalent to their national visas for the purpose of transit, certain documents issued by the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis and documents issued by other new Member States to third country nationals subject to a visa obligation pursuant to Regulation (EC) 539/2001.
Ta odločba uvaja poenostavljen režim kontrole oseb na zunanjih mejah na temelju dovoljenja Češki, Estoniji, Cipru, Latviji, Litvi, Madžarski, Malti, Poljski, Sloveniji in Slovaški (v nadaljnjem besedilu nove države članice), da za namen tranzita enostransko priznajo dokumente iz člena 2(1) in člena 3 , ki jih izdajo druge nove države članice državljanom tretjih držav, ki morajo na podlagi Uredbe (ES) 539/2001 imeti vizum, kot enakovredne svojim nacionalnim vizumom.
This Decision introduces a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on allowing the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, (hereinafter referred to as the new Member States) to recognise unilaterally as equivalent to their national visas for the purpose of transit the documents referred to in Article 2(1) and those referred to in Article 3 issued by other new Member States to third country nationals subject to a visa obligation pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Pravna služba je predlagala uporabo ustaljenega besedila za sklicevanje na države članice, ki v celoti izvajajo schengenski pravni red ter na Islandijo in Norveško, ki sodelujeta pri izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda.
It has been suggested by the Legal Service to use the model wording for the reference to the Member States which fully implement the Schengen Acquis and to Island and Norway which are associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis.
Izvajanje te odločbe ne vpliva na izvajanje kontrol oseb na zunanjih mejah v skladu s členi od 5 do 13 in od 18 do 19 Uredbe (ES) št. .../2006 [o vzpostaviti kodeksa Skupnosti o predpisih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb preko meja (kodeksa o schengenskih mejah)].
The implementation of this Decision shall not affect the checks to be carried out on persons at the external borders in compliance with Articles 5 to 13 and 18 to 19 of Regulation (EC) No …/2006 [establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)].
Člen 2, odstavek 1, uvodne besede ter točki (i) in (ii)
Article 2, paragraph 1, introductory wording and points (a) and (b)
Nova država članica lahko za namen tranzita kot enakovredne svojemu nacionalnemu vizumu šteje naslednje dokumente, ki jih izdajajo države članice, ki polno izvajajo schengenski pravni red , ne glede na državljanstvo imetnikov:
A new Member State may consider as equivalent to its national visa for the purpose of transit the following documents issued by the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis , irrespective of the nationality of the holders:
Nova država članica lahko za namen tranzita kot enakovredne svojemu nacionalnemu vizumu šteje naslednje dokumente, ne glede na državljanstvo imetnikov:
A new Member State may consider as equivalent to its national visa for the purpose of transit the following documents, irrespective of the nationality of the holders:
(i) „enotni vizum“ iz člena 10 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma;
(i) a “uniform visa” as referred to in Article 10 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement ;
(i) „enotni vizum“ iz določb v členu 10 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma;
(i) a “uniform visa” as referred to in the provisions of Article 10 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement ;
(ii) „vizum za daljše bivanje“ iz člena 18 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma;
(ii) a “long stay visa” as referred to in Article 18 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement ;
(ii) „vizum za daljše bivanje“ iz določb v členu 18 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma;
(ii) a “long stay visa” as referred to in the provisions of Article 18 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement ;
Če se nova država članica odloči za uporabo te odločbe, prizna vse dokumente iz odstavka 2, ki jih izdajo države članice, ki polno izvajajo schengenski pravni red , neodvisno od države, ki izda dokument.
If a new Member State decides to apply this Decision, it shall recognise all documents referred to in paragraph 2 issued by the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis independently of the State issuing the document.
Če se nova država članica odloči za uporabo te odločbe, prizna vse dokumente iz odstavka 1 , neodvisno od države, ki izda dokument.
If a new Member State decides to apply this Decision, it shall recognise all the documents referred to in paragraph 1 independently of the State issuing the document.
Države članice lahko priznajo dokumente kot enakovredne svojim nacionalnim vizumom samo za namen tranzita, če trajanje tranzita državljana tretje države preko ozemlja nove(-ih) države(držav) članice(članic) ne presega pet dni.
Member States may only recognise documents as equivalent to their national visas for the purpose of transit if the duration of the transit by the third country national through the territory of the new Member State(s) shall not exceed five days.
Nove države članice lahko priznajo dokumente kot enakovredne svojim nacionalnim vizumom samo za namen tranzita, če trajanje tranzita državljana tretje države preko ozemlja nove(-ih) države(držav) članice(članic) ne presega pet dni za posamezen tranzit .
New Member States may only recognise documents as equivalent to their national visas for the purpose of transit if the duration of the transit by the third country national through the territory of the new Member State(s) shall not exceed five days per transit.
Enoten vizum, ki dovoljuje en vstop in je bil uporabljen za vstop v državo članico, ki polno izvaja schengenski pravni red, velja tudi za imetnikovo povratno potovanje za tranzit nazaj preko ozemlja iste nove države članice.
A uniform visa allowing one entry which has been used for entry into a Member State fully implementing the Schengen acquis shall be valid on the holder’s return trip for transit back through the territory of a same one new Member State .