natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(g) razpon zakonodajnih instrumentov Evropske unije bo bolj omejen in število postopkov za njihovo sprejemanje manjše; vzpostavila se bo hierarhija aktov; z izvajanjem pooblastil, ki so ji bila dodeljena pod neposrednim nadzorom zakonodajalca, bo Komisija lahko razširila ali dopolnila zakonodajne akte, ter tako pripomogla k večji kakovosti evropske zakonodaje, večji enostavnosti in boljši prilagodljivosti; poleg tega bodo splošne določbe za izvedbene akte ("komitologija") opredeljene preko postopka soodločanja;
(g) there will be a more limited set of European Union legislative instruments and a more limited number of procedures for their adoption; a hierarchy of acts will be established; exercising the power delegated to it under the direct supervision of the legislator, the Commission will be able to expand or supplement legislative acts, thus helping to improve the quality of European legislation and making it simpler and more adaptable; furthermore, the general arrangements applicable to implementing acts (‘comitology’) will be laid down by means of codecision;
Odstavek 3, točka (j a) (novo)
Paragraph 3, point (j a) (new)
(ja) spremembe v vodenju in pristojnostih Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti bodo omogočile njegovo bolj učinkovito delovanje;
(ja) the changes to the running and the powers of the Court of Justice will enable it to operate more efficiently;
Predlog spremembe 5
Amendment 5
Odstavek 4, točka (b a) (novo)
Paragraph 4, point (b a) (new)
(ba) akti Unije so lahko predmet skrbnega predhodnega pregleda z vidika upoštevanja načela subsidiarnosti, v procesu katerega bodo lahko imeli vlogo nacionalni in celo regionalni parlamenti, ter naknadnega sodnega preskusa na pobudo parlamentov ali Odbora regij;
(ba) Union acts may be subjected to genuine prior scrutiny according to the yardstick of subsidiarity, a process in which the national and even regional parliaments will be able to play their part, and to subsequent judicial review on the initiative of the parliaments or of the Committee of the Regions;
Odstavek 4, točka (g)
Paragraph 4, point (g)
(g) čeprav pooblastila Evropskega parlamenta glede boljšega zakonskega urejanja in nadzora Komisijinega izvajanja izvršilnih pooblastil v Ustavi niso izrecno omenjena ; bo izvrševanje delegiranih zakonodajnih pooblastil s strani Komisije predpisano z evropskimi zakoni v okviru novega sistema nadzora Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta; ki naj bi slednjima omogočal , da prekličeta sklepe Komisije, katerim nasprotujeta;
(g) although the powers of the European Parliament concerning better regulation and control of the exercise of implementing powers by the Commission are not laid down expressly in the Constitution, the exercise of delegated legislative powers and implementing powers by the Commission will be brought by European laws within a new system of joint supervision by the European Parliament and the Council, which should enable each of them to revoke Commission decisions to which they object;
Paragraph 5, point (a)
Paragraph 5, point (a)
(a) vse določbe zakonodaje Evropske unije in vsi ukrepi ustanov Evropske unije oziroma vsi ukrepi, ki temeljijo na zakonodaji Evropske unije, bodo morali upoštevati v osnutku Ustave zastavljene standarde spoštovanja temeljnih pravic, predvsem ker del II sedaj vključuje Listino o temeljnih pravicah, ki je s tem postala pravno zavezujoča, navkljub dejstvu, da je predsedstvo Konvencije v izjavah o obrazložitvi Listine o temeljnih pravicah želelo omejiti razlago le-te s strani Sodišč Unije in držav članic;
(a) all provisions of European Union law and all action taken by European Union institutions or based on European Union law will have to meet the standards of fundamental rights laid down in the draft Constitution, especially in Part II thereof incorporating the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is therefore legally binding, although the declaration concerning the explanations given in relation to the Charter of Fundamental Rights as updated under the responsibility of the Presidium of the Convention aims at ring-fencing the interpretation thereof by the courts of the Union and of the Member States ;
Paragraph 5, point (c)
Paragraph 5, point (c)
(c) z uvedbo pobude evropskih državljanov je v Ustavo vključen neposreden instrument demokratičnosti, ki državljanom omogoča predložitev prdlogov v zvezi z zadevami, za katere menijo; da je potreben pravni predpis Unije v namen izvajanja Ustave;
(c) through the introduction of a European citizens’ initiative a direct democratic instrument is enshrined in the Constitution, allowing citizens to submit proposals on matters where they consider that a legal act of the Union is required for the purpose of implementing the Constitution;
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
MNENJE ODBORA ZA s VOBOŠČINE IN PRAVICE DRŽAVLJANOV, PRAVOSODJE IN NOTRANJE ZADEVE
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Odbor za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Evropski parlament,
The European Parliament
2. meni, da Pogodba o Ustavi popolnoma odgovarja na pričakovanja Evropskega parlamenta glede osnovanja pravega skupnega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice;
Considers that the Constitutional Treaty meets in full the expectations expressed by the European Parliament with regard to the creation of a genuine common area of freedom, security and justice;
· Pogodba o Ustavi zapolnjuje pomanjkanje demokracije, ki označuje proces sprejemanja odločitev pri pravosodnem in policijskem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah ter da združenje Skupnosti v Unijo, razširitev zakonodajnega postopka na področjih, ki so prej spadala pod tretji steber ter uporaba glasovanja s kvalificirano večino dovoljujejo končno uresničenje "Unije prava";
· the Constitutional Treaty makes good the democratic deficit that characterises the decision-making process in matters of judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters, and that the merger of the Community into the Union, the extension of the legislative procedure to former third-pillar areas and the introduction of qualified majority voting mean that a genuine 'Union of the rule of law' can at last be achieved;
· bo Listina temeljnih pravic vključena v Pogodbo o ustavi, kar bo zagotavljalo učinkovito zaščito pravic v Evropski uniji, kar je nujna predpostavka za uresničenje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice;
· the Charter of Fundamental Rights is to be incorporated into the Constitutional Treaty, which will guarantee the effective protection of those rights in the European Union, this being a prerequisite for the completion of the area of freedom, security and justice;
· je bila v osnutku Pogodbe izražena pripravljenost za pristop Evropske unije k Evropski konvenciji za zaščito človekovih pravic;
· the Treaty provides that the European Union shall accede to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
· zahvaljujoč ukinitvi stebrne strukture bo končno možno imeti skupno pravno osnovo za varovanje osebnih podatkov, dopuščajoč potrebno harmonizacijo obstoječih določb, še posebno na področju sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah ter policijskega sodelovanja;
· thanks to the abolition of the pillar structure, it will at last be possible to have a common legal basis for data protection, which will allow the necessary harmonisation of existing provisions, particularly in the field of criminal and police cooperation;
· je bila priznana pravica zakonodajne pobude na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah ter policijskega sodelovanja četrtini izmed držav članic, upoštevajoč, da za razliko od primera notranjega trga uresničevanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ne zmanjšuje, temveč povečuje vlogo držav članic, ki morajo zato znati predlagati Uniji rešitve za meddržavne probleme;
· the right of legislative initiative for a quarter of the Member States has been recognised in the area of judicial cooperation on criminal matters and police cooperation; Member States may thus participate actively in the creation of the area of freedom, security and justice, proposing to the Union solutions to matters that transcend national boundaries;
· bo priseljevalna politika postala polnopravna politika Evropske unije, ki bo presegla zgolj obete nadzora notranje varnosti in spodbujanja solidarnosti ter enakopravne razdelitve odgovornosti med države članice na tem področju; naj se poleg tega izdela specifično pravno osnovo za integracijo državljanov iz tretjih držav, ki zakonito prebivajo v Uniji;
· immigration policy is to become a fully-fledged European Union policy, transcending the concept of the straightforward protection of internal security and promoting solidarity and the equal distribution of responsibilities among the Member States in this domain, and that a specific legal basis is to be introduced for the integration of third-country nationals residing legally in the Union;
· je bil storjen pomemben napredek na področju realizacije evropskega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter spodbujanja kakovosti pravosodja na evropski ravni;
· considerable progress has been made in the context of the completion of a European area of freedom, security and justice and of the promotion of the quality of justice at European level;
· Pogodba o Ustavi določa okvir evropskega javnega reda, s katerim nista zaščiteni zgolj notranja in zunanja varnost držav članic, ampak tudi varnost Evropske unije ter da je potrebno v tej smeri okrepiti vloga Komisije ter agencij, kot sta Eurojust in Europol;
· the Constitutional Treaty defines the outlines of European law and order as safeguarding the security not only of Member States but also of the European Union, both internally and externally, and that the role of the Commission, as well as agencies such as Eurojust and Europol, is to be enhanced to this end;
· Europol ne bo več temeljil na medvladnem dogovoru, ampak na redni evropski zakonodaji, ter bo deloval pod nadzorom Evropskega parlamenta, državnih parlamentov in Sodišča;
· Europol will no longer have to have an intergovernmental agreement as its basis, but rather an ordinary European law, and will conduct its activities under the supervision of the European Parliament, national parliaments and the Court of Justice;
· pogodba Svetu dodeljuje primerno pravno podlago za poglobitev področja svobode, varnosti in pravice, zlasti z razširitvijo obsega harmonizacije kazenskega materialnega prava ali pristojnosti Urada evropskega javnega tožilca;
· the Treaty confers a suitable legal basis on the Council for deepening the area of freedom, security and justice, notably by extending the scope for harmonisation of substantive criminal law or the competences of the European Public Prosecutor's office;
· se še posebej okrepi vloga nacionalnih parlamentov, zlasti kar zadeva nadzorovanje spoštovanja načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, sodelovanja v postopku ocenjevanja Eurojusta in izvajanja politik, povezanih s področjem svobode, varnosti in pravice, s strani držav članic;
· in particular, the role of the national parliaments is strengthened, especially as regards monitoring of respect for the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, participation in the Eurojust evaluation processes and implementation by the Member States of the policies relating to the area of freedom, security and justice;
· Ustavna pogodba bo olajšala boj Unije proti trgovini z ljudmi ter spolni zlorabi žensk in otrok (še posebno s členom II-65(3), ki prepoveduje trgovino z ljudmi in členom III-271(1), ki predvideva možnost določanja minimalnih pravil glede opredelitve kaznivih dejanj in kazni na področju posebno hudih oblik kriminala, kot so trgovina z ljudmi in spolna zloraba žensk in otrok);
· the Union's fight against trafficking in people and sexual exploitation of women and children will be facilitated by the Constitutional Treaty (particularly by means of Article II-65(3), which prohibits trafficking in human beings, and Article III-271(1), which provides for the possibility of establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the areas of particularly serious crime, such as trafficking in human beings and sexual exploitation of women and children);
· omejitev, vpeljanih s klavzulo (člen III- 267(5)), ki dodeljuje samo državam članicam pravico določitve števila državljanov iz tretjih držav, ki lahko vstopijo na njihovo ozemlje, ter tako izključuje možnost oblikovanja prave evropske politike za upravljanje z zakonitimi vstopi v Evropsko unijo;
· the limitations imposed by the introduction of the clause (Article III-267(5)) granting Member States alone the power to determine the volumes of admission to their territory of third-country nationals, which effectively precludes the possibility of establishing a genuine European policy for the management of legal admissions to the European Union;
· primernosti vključitve tako imenovane klavzule " emergency brake" (člen III- 270 (3)) za področje pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah;
· the appropriateness of incorporating the 'emergency brake' clause (Article III-270(3)) for judicial cooperation in criminal matters;
· primernosti obstoja posebnih dovoljenj, ki jih imajo nekatere države za odstopanje od ustave;
· the appropriateness of some Member States being able to enjoy special arrangements for derogation from the Constitution;
· omejene vloge Evropskega parlamenta na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah, predvsem kar se tiče družinskega prava;
· the European Parliament's limited role in the area of judicial cooperation in civil matters as regards family law;
· omejevanja ukrepov za zamrznitev finančnih in drugih sredstev ter dobička, potrebnih za doseganje ciljev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, na preprečevanje in boj proti terorizmu, kar je v nasprotju z besedilom Konvencije, ki je te ukrepe predvidelo tudi za preprečevanje in boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu ter trgovanju z ljudmi;
· the fact that the clauses relating to the freezing of funds, financial assets and economic gains needed to achieve the objectives of the area of freedom, security and justice are limited, contrary to what was proposed in the Convention text, to the area of the prevention and combating of terrorism, and exclude the prevention and combating of organised crime and of trafficking in human beings;
· predlaganih omejitev pristojnosti Urada evropskega javnega tožilca; meni, da bi se njegove pristojnosti morale razširiti na področje zaščite finančnih interesov Unije (člen III-274);
· the proposed limitations on the powers of the European Public Prosecutor's office; believes that its powers should possibly be extended beyond the sole area of the protection of the Union's financial interests (Article III-274);
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PETICIJE
OPINION of the Committee on Petitions
o Pogodbi o Ustavi za Evropo.
on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
Odbor za peticije poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Petitions calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Konvencijo za prihodnost Evrope so zaprosili, da pripravi predloge s treh področij, v skladu z uvodom novega osnutka Ustave, na vrhu v Laekenu decembra 2001.
The Convention on the Future of Europe was asked to make proposals on three subjects, according to the preface of the new Draft Constitution, at the Laeken Summit in December 2001.
Prvo od teh vprašanj je bilo „ kako zbližati državljane z evropskim načrtovanjem in evropskimi institucijami“ .
The first of these questions was "how to bring citizens closer to the European design and European Institutions".
Odbor za peticije je del Evropskega parlamenta, saj sodi izključno v zgradbo parlamentarnega odbora ter ima reden in dneven stik z državljani iz vsake države članice Unije.
The Committee on Petitions is best placed within the European Parliament to respond because it is uniquely placed within Parliament's committee structure and has regular and daily contact with citizens from every Member State of the Union.
Bolj kot kateri koli drugi odbor ali organ Unije je stalno seznanjen s posameznimi skrbmi in odzivi evropskih državljanov v zvezi z evropskimi zadevami, saj ga o tem obveščajo državljani sami.
More than any other committee, or organ of the Union, it is made constantly aware by European citizens themselves of their individual concerns and reactions to European issues.
Zaradi tega lahko presoja, kaj v vsakdanjem življenju Unije deluje in kaj ne.
It is therefore able to judge what is working and what is not in the everyday life of the Union.
Vseeno pa je Odbor za peticije le majhen vrh velike evropske ledene gore.
Yet, the Petitions Committee is only a small tip of a very large European iceberg.
Čeprav se po eni strani zahteva približevanje državljanom, je jasno, da ostajajo metode in načini dela neparlamentarnih institucij Unije oddaljeni in neznani ali se v najboljšem primeru narobe razumejo ter se jim zato redko zaupa.
While it may claim proximity to the citizen, it is evident that the methods and working practices of the non-parliamentary institutions of the Union remain distant and unknown, or at best misunderstood, and rarely trusted.
Za rešitev tega problema je verjetno potrebna več kot le Ustava.
It probably requires more than a Constitution to resolve that problem.
Osnutek Ustave vsebuje predloge, ki bodo evropskemu državljanu pripomogli k večjemu razumevanju okvira, v katerem poslujejo EU in države članice.
The Draft Constitution contains proposals which will allow the European citizen to better understand the framework within which the EU and the Member States conduct their business.
Vprašanje temeljnih pravic in vprašanje državljanstva se takoj naslovita na osnutek Ustave, Listina o temeljnih pravicah pa se v celoti vključi v del II.
The question of fundamental rights and citizenship is immediately addressed in the Draft Constitution, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights is fully incorporated into the text in Part II.
Poleg tega se Unija zaveže k pristopu Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, h kateri lahko trenutno pristopijo le države članice v okviru Sveta Evrope.
In addition the Union commits itself to accession to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to which currently only Member States can accede in the framework of the Council of Europe.
Trenutno je povprečen prosilec deležen visoke stopnje nerazumevanja pri natančnem določanju, katere pravice uživajo v zvezi s katerim sporazumom.
For the average petitioner at the moment there is a high degree of incomprehension regarding precisely which rights they enjoy under which agreement.
Še posebej težko razumejo, zakaj ima Unija Listino o temeljnih pravicah, če za njeno izvajanje oziroma dejansko izvrševanje nima nobenih praktičnih sredstev.
It is particularly hard for them to grasp why the Union now has a Fundamental Charter, yet has no practical means to ensure its enforcement or real implementation.
Obveščanje o tem, da so njihovi zadržki stvar Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in da morajo uporabiti pravne poti v svojih državah članicah, ni ravno rešitev za njihov problem, katerega so ga naslovili na Odbor za peticije Evropskega parlamenta.
To be told that their concerns are a matter for the European Court of Human Rights and they have to pursue legal paths in their Member States hardly responds to the problems which they have addressed to the European Parliament's Petitions Committee.
Vsak državljan države članice je državljan Unije.
Every national of a Member State will be a citizen of the Union.
Državljanstvo EU ne obstaja.
There is no EU nationality.
Med njihovimi navedenimi pravicami je tudi pravica za predložitev peticije Evropskemu parlamentu, ki jo uživajo od uveljavitve Maastrichtske pogodbe.
Amongst their enshrined rights is the right to petition the European Parliament, which they have enjoyed under the Treaty since Maastricht.
Napori, ki sta jih vložila Odbor za peticije in Evropski parlament, da bi dosegla odpravljanje za državljane, so pogosto uspešni, še zlasti, če najdeta rešitev v sodelovanju z organi držav članic (nacionalnimi, regionalnimi ali lokalnimi) ali če gre dejansko za kršitev zakonodaje EU in lahko Komisija izvaja pritisk pod grožnjo kršitve.
Efforts undertaken by the Petitions Committee and the European Parliament to obtain redress for citizens are often successful, particularly when the solution is found in cooperation with Member States' authorities (national, regional or local) or when there is a clear violation of EU law and the Commission can exert pressure under threat of infringement.
Vendar pa zagotavlja postopek zaradi kršitve, če je uspešen, le usklajenost države članice z dano direktivo.
However the infringement procedure merely ensures, if successful, the compliance of the Member State with a given directive.
Redko se zgodi, da to neposredno pomaga posameznemu prosilcu.
It rarely does anything for the individual petitioner directly.
Kar se zahteva v skladu s pogoji Ustave, v njenih izvedbenih določbah ali v kontekstu medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, so točno določeni postopki, ki predvidevajo izvensodna sredstva odpravljanja in ki uveljavljajo določbe iz naslova II.
Therefore, what is required under the terms of the Constitution, in its implementing provisions, or in the context of an interinstitutional agreement are clearly defined procedures which provide for a non-judicial means of redress which would give practical effect to the provisions contained in Title II.
Demokracija udeleževanja.
Participatory Democracy.
Naslov VI določa in potrjuje udeležbo državljanov v demokratičnem življenju Unije, pa tudi odgovornosti evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, ki se ukvarja z „nepravilnostmi znotraj organov ali agencij institucij Unije“, pomembnost zaščite osebnih podatkov in status cerkva in nekonfesionalnih organizacij.
Title VI provides for and confirms the participation of the citizen in the democratic life of the Union as well as specifying the responsibilities of the European Ombudsman who deals with "maladministration within the Union Institutions bodies or agencies", the importance of personal data protection and the status of churches and non-confessional organisations.
Določena so izpopolnjena pravila preglednosti.
Improved rules of transparency are defined.
Takšne določbe so pomembne za državljane in posledično tudi za Odbor za peticije, ki spremlja, kot se opozarja, aktivnosti in ki organizira izvolitev varuha človekovih pravic.
Such provisions are important for the citizen and therefore for the Petitions Committee, which, it is recalled, supervises the activity and organises the election of the Ombudsman.
Člen 46 gre še dalje in daje „državljanom in predstavniškim združenjem možnost, da predstavijo in javno izmenjajo svoja mnenja o vseh področij delovanja Unije“, kar izvajajo že nekaj časa v okviru postopka obravnave peticij.
Article 46 goes further and gives "citizens and representative associations the opportunity to make known and publicly exchange their views in all areas of Union action", which they have been doing for some time under the petitions process.
Vendar pa ustvarja odstavek 4 člena 46 povsem novo priložnost za državljane – ali bolj natančno, za milijon državljanov.
However, Paragraph 4 of Article 46 creates a completely new opportunity for the citizen - or to be more precise, for one million citizens.
Določba se sprejme za državljane v zvezi s sprejemom pravnih predpisov v Uniji.
That is, provision is made for citizens to initiate a legal act of the Union.
To predstavlja neverjetno priložnost za Unijo, da se v zakonski obliki odzove na zadržke ljudi.
This represents an incredible opportunity for the Union itself to be seen to respond in legislative form to the direct concerns of people.