natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V predhodnem predlogu proračuna za leto 2007 je predvideno precejšnje povečanje odobritev za prevzem obveznosti za jedrsko varnost, vključno z razgradnjo, namreč 244 milijonov EUR (to je 70 % več kot v letu 2006).
There is a considerable increase in the commitment appropriations foreseen in the PDB 2007 for nuclear safety including decommissioning: EUR 244 million (which represents an increase of 70% in commitment appropriations when compared to 2006).
Razlog za to povečanje je predvsem to, da bo EU namenila znatno finančno pomoč za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn Ignalina v Litvi, Bohunice VI na Slovaškem in Kozloduj v Bolgariji.
This is mainly due to the fact that the EU gives considerable financial support to the decommissioning of the nuclear power stations in Ignalina (Lithuania), Bohunice VI (Slovakia) and Kozloduy (Bulgaria).
Evropo čaka še veliko dela
Still a long way to go
Evropa še vedno nima povsem konkurenčnega notranjega trga energije.
Europe has not yet developed fully competitive internal energy markets.
Šele ko bo tak trg vzpostavljen, bodo lahko državljani in podjetja v EU uživali vse prednosti nepretrgane dobave in nižjih cen.
Only when such markets exist will EU citizens and businesses enjoy all the benefits of security of supply and lower prices.
Da bi dosegli ta cilj, je treba vzpostaviti medsebojne povezave, sprejeti in v celoti izvajati učinkovite zakone in predpise ter odločno uveljaviti pravila Skupnosti o konkurenci.
To achieve this aim, interconnections should be developed, effective legislative and regulatory frameworks must be in place and be fully applied in practice, and Community competition rules need to be rigorously enforced.
Poleg tega mora biti konsolidacija energetskega sektorja tržno usmerjena, sicer se Evropa ne bo mogla uspešno odzivati na številne izzive in primerno vlagati za prihodnost.
Furthermore, the consolidation of the energy sector should be market driven if Europe is to respond successfully to the many challenges it faces and to invest properly for the future.
Tudi tega ne kaže pozabiti, da energetska učinkovitost ponuja številne možnosti, ki še zdaleč niso izkoriščene.
One should also not forget that there is a huge potential of energy efficiency that is still widely unused.
Zato bi bilo treba pripraviti akcije obveščanja in ozaveščanja porabnikov o boljšem izkoristku energije.
More awareness-raising and information of the energy consumer how to spend less energy while achieving the same result are badly needed.
Nekateri strokovnjaki za energijo trdijo, da takšni ukrepi še vedno niso deležni dovolj pozornosti (in sredstev).
Some energy experts argue that such measures still do not receive enough attention (and funding).
Obstaja tudi direktiva o energetskih storitvah, ki naj bi vzpostavila trg storitev, s katerimi bi porabniki zmanjšali stroške za energijo.
There is also a recent Directive on "Energy Services" that tries to establish a market for services aiming at reducing the consumers´ energy bill.
Učinkovita energetska politika EU ne sestoji le iz proračunskih ukrepov.
An efficient EU energy policy does not only consist of budget-related action.
Svetovno povpraševanje po energiji narašča in naj bi se do leta 2030 povečalo za približno 60 % – seveda ob tem naraščajo tudi emisije CO 2 .
World energy demand - and CO2 emissions – is expected to rise by some 60% by 2030.
Evropska unija, drugi največji svetovni energetski trg z več kot 450 milijoni porabnikov, mora na svetovnem odru delovati enotno, da si bo lahko priborila čim boljše trgovinske pogoje in naložbe na področju energije.
There is certainly a need for the EU to speak with one voice as the world’s second largest energy market with over 450 million consumers and to negotiate the best possible conditions for trade and investments in the energy field.
Uporabo novih in alternativnih goriv ter obnovljivih virov energije bi bilo mogoče spodbuditi z davčno politiko, ki je zaenkrat še vedno večinoma v pristojnosti držav članic.
Tax policy, which is still widely a competence of the Member States, can provide an incentive to use new and alternative fuels and renewable energy.
Navsezadnje pa ne smemo pozabiti, da je EU že sprejela številne evropske zakone na področju energije (na primer o spodbujanju biogoriv, obnovljivih virih energije, vzpostavitvi notranjega trga zemeljskega plina in električne energije, energetski učinkovitosti in podobno).
Last but not least one should not forget that the EU has already adopted a wide range of EU legislation in the field of energy (e.g. on the promotion of biofuels, renewable energy, completion of the internal market in gas and electricity, energy efficiency etc.)
V tem smislu je politika energetske učinkovitosti odvisna tudi od ustreznega izvajanja zakonodaje EU v državah članicah, kot je Evropski parlament poudaril v resoluciji o strategiji politik za leto 2007.
In this sense an efficient energy policy is also a question of proper implementation of EU legislation by the Member States, as stressed by the European Parliament in its resolution on the APS for 2007.
Vprašanja za obravnavo
Questions for the hearing
V kolikšni meri načrtovana poraba sredstev EU za raziskave in razvoj v predhodnem predlogu proračuna za leto 2007 ustreza visokim ciljem lizbonske strategije?
How well does planned EU spending in PDB 2007 on research and innovation match up to the ambitious objectives of the Lisbon Strategy?
Ali ima gospodarstvo EU dovolj močno znanstveno bazo, ki bi omogočila še večji proračun za raziskave?
Does the EU economy have a strong enough scientific skills-base for an even higher research budget?
Ali je sedmi okvirni program za raziskave dovolj prilagodljiv za nove izzive, s katerimi se bo soočila EU?
Does the 7th Research Framework Programme (FP7) allow for sufficient flexibility in order to address new and adapt to future challenges facing the EU?
Natančneje, v kolikšni meri se sedmi okvirni program odziva na vse pomembnejše izzive, s katerimi se EU sooča na področju energetske politike, kjer je tehnološki napredek ključen za prihodnost EU in njenega gospodarstva?
More specifically, how far does FP7 respond to the increasingly important challenges facing the EU as regards energy policy, where technological progress is of vital interest for the future of the EU and its economy?
Katere ukrepe bi lahko sprejeli v proračunskem postopku za leto 2007, da bi upoštevali te nove prednostne naloge?
What steps can be taken in the 2007 budgetary procedure in order to reflect this new priority?
Kako bi bilo še mogoče izboljšati pravila za sodelovanje v raziskovalnih programih EU?
Where do you see room for improvement in the current rules for participation in EU research programmes?
Kako bi lahko omejena sredstva za sedmi okvirni program porabili učinkoviteje, upoštevaje izkušnje z izvajanjem šestega okvirnega programa?
Having regard to experience gained during the implementation of the previous FP6, how can the limited funds of FP7 be spent more efficiently?
Kako bi si lahko pri tem pomagali z analizo stroškov in koristi?
What role is there for cost-benefit analysis in this regard?
o svobodi, varnosti in pravici
on freedom, security and justice
„O tem, ali je država resnično svobodna, najbolje priča svoboda, ki jo uživajo njene manjšine.“ – lord Acton
" The most certain test by which we judge whether a country is really free is the amount of security enjoyed by its minorities", Lord Acton
Ta delovni dokument obravnava finančna sredstva, ki naj bi jih Evropska unija v letu 2007 zagotovila v naslovu 18 (Svoboda, varnost in pravica) splošnega proračuna.
This working document analyses the financial resources that the European Union is due to provide in 2007 under Title 18 entitled "Freedom, Security and Justice" in its general budget.
Na primer: Evropski parlament, 2006/179/ES, Euratom – Dokončno sprejetje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, UL L 78 z dne 15. marca 2006, str.
For example European Parliament 2006/179/EC, Euratom -Final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, OJ L 78 of 15 March 2006, p.
935–1005, naslov „Območje svobode, varnosti in pravice“.
935 - 1005 under Title "Area of Freedom.
To področje je uvedla amsterdamska pogodba in je povezano predvsem s politikami, ki bi jih na ravni držav članic lahko označili kot „notranje“.
Security and Justice" This policy area was established under the Amsterdam Treaty and broadly refers to policies which at Member State level could be described as "Internal" or "Home affairs".
Primerjava s porabo v prejšnjih proračunskih letih je izjemno zapletena, ker se je nomenklatura v zadnjem obdobju pogosto spreminjala.
Comparison with spending in previous budget years is extremely difficult given nomenclature that has changed frequently over recent years.
Še več, šest proračunskih postavk oziroma dejavnosti pod naslovom 18 je bilo preimenovanih,
Moreover, six budget lines/ activities under title 18 have changed name
Gl. prilogo VI dokumenta SEC(2006)231, dokument II, točka 4.6, str.
see Annex VI to document SEC(2006)231, document II, point 4.6, p.
100. tako da se v proračunu za leto 2006 in predhodnem predlogu proračuna 2007 razlikujejo.
100 between the budget 2006 and the 2007 preliminary draft budget (PDB).
Razdelek 3 v večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2007–2013 se zdaj imenuje „Državljanstvo, svoboda, varnost in pravica“, toda notranje zadeve so prvič vključene v novi podrazdelek 3a z naslovom „Svoboda, varnost in pravica“.
Heading 3 in the Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF) 2007 - 2013 is now called "Citizenship, Freedom, Security and Justice", but internal/ home affairs issues are, for the first time, covered by a newly established sub-heading "Freedom, Security and Justice": Heading 3a.
Državljanstvu je namenjen poseben podrazdelek 3b.
"Citizenship" is covered under heading 3b.
Razporeditev sredstev za svobodo, varnost in pravico v posebni podrazdelek finančnega okvira pomeni, da ima to področje večjo prednost kot v obdobju 2000–2006, ter zagotavlja boljšo prepoznavnost politik in trdno finančno osnovo zanje, saj Komisija proračunskih sredstev ne more brez težav prerazporediti med druga področja politike.
Having "ring fenced" for the first time the amounts allocated to "Justice, Freedom and Security" in a specific subheading in the MFF marks the priority given to it compared to the period 2000 - 2006 and ensures increased visibility and a stable financial basis to its policies as the Commission can not easily reshuffle its budget to other policy areas.
Za sredstva za področje pravosodja, svobode in varnosti je odgovoren komisar in podpredsednik Komisije Frattini.
The responsible Commissioner, Vice-President Frattini, has the portfolio "Justice, Freedom and Security".
Tako se po novem imenuje tudi ustrezni generalni direktorat Komisije, ki se je do avgusta 2004 imenoval direktorat za pravosodje in notranje zadeve.
This is also the name of the relevant Commission Directorate-General, which was named "Justice and Home affairs" until August 2004
Za ta direktorat se uporablja tudi kratica GD JLS.
Somewhat confusingly, this Commission DG is sometimes referred to by the abbreviation of DG JLS. .
V delu „Sodelovanje“ predhodnega predloga proračuna za leto 2007 je za proračunsko vrstico 02 04 01 („Varnost in vesoljske raziskave“) predvidenih 171,7 milijona EUR odobritev za prevzem obveznosti. (omenjene v podrazdelku 1a).
under part "Co-operation" a budget line 02 04 01 called "Security and Space Research" gets underway in 2007 with EUR 171,7 million in commitment appropriations (mentioned in Subheading 1a).
Prav tako se ne bo posvečal odhodkom v podrazdelku 3b („Državljanstvo“), ki bodo namenjeni seznanjanju državljanov EU s politikami EU.
It also does not analyse expenditure falling under subheading 3b "Citizenship" which covers the communication of EU policies to citizens of the European Union.
Skupna sredstva v podrazdelku 3a
Overall resources within Heading 3a
Kot je Evropski parlament zapisal v resoluciji o poročilu Komisije o letni strategiji politik,
As the European Parliament in its resolution on the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy report (APS) stated
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. maja 2006 o proračunu za leto 2007: poročilo Komisije o letni strategiji politik, P6_TA-PROV(2006)0221 „evropski državljani v vsakdanjem življenju potrebujejo varnost“, „v boju s sodobnim, globaliziranim kriminalom [pa je] usklajena akcija EU nujna sestavina politik, sicer ne bo mogoče zagotoviti varne družbe, temelječe na pravni državi“.
European Parliament resolution of 18 May 2006 on the 2007 budget: the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy report (APS), P6_TA-PROV(2006)0221 : "European citizens need security in their everyday lives" and "in the face of modern, globalized crime, concerted EU action is a necessary component of policies to ensure a safe society founded on the rule of law"
Gl. točki 22 in 23 omenjene resolucije.
point 22 and 23 of the APS resolution .
Komisija v predhodnem predlogu proračuna za leto 2007 predlaga povišanje skupnih sredstev za politiko na tem področju, in sicer za 5,24 % v primerjavi z letom 2006, ko je za ta namen predvidela 588,2 milijona EUR, tako da zdaj znašajo 619 milijonov EUR.
In terms of the overall resources to tackles policy challenges in this area, in its Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB), the Commission states an increase of 5,24 % between the figures for 2007 (EUR 619 million) and 2006 (EUR 588,2 million)
SEC(2006)231, dokument II, točka 3.18, str.
SEC(2006)231, document II, point 3.18, p.54 .
54 V ustrezni tabeli proračuna za leto 2006
Looking at the corresponding table in the Budget 2006
UL L 78, 15. marec 2006, str.
OJ L 78 of 15 March 2006, p.
935. je proračunski organ naslovu 18 dodelil 590,4 milijona EUR, kar pomeni le 4,84-odstotno povečanje.
935 , EUR 590,4 million had been allocated by the budgetary authority to Title 18, which would mean an increase of only 4,84 per cent.
Jasno je, da predvideni znesek 619 milijonov EUR v predhodnem predlogu proračuna vsebuje tako upravne odhodke kot odhodke iz poslovanja.
It is clear that the EUR 619 million appropriation foreseen in the PDB contains administrative as well as operational expenditure.
Žal ta številka ne ustreza vrstici 18 01 z naslovom „upravni odhodki na področju politik svobode, varnosti in pravice“, kjer je predlagan znesek 51,47 milijona EUR.
Unfortunately, this does not correspond to line 18 01 entitled "administrative expenditure of area of freedom, security and justice policy area" for which EUR 51,47 million is requested.
Komisija v predhodnem predlogu proračuna za leto 2007 predlaga ločitev različnih ukrepov (splošni programi, drugi ukrepi in programi, decentralizirane agencije):
The Commission presents the following split between the different actions (general programmes, other actions and programmes, decentralised agencies) in PDB 2007:
Tabela 1
Table 1
Ni jasno, ali bo mogoče ti dve številki sploh primerjati, saj se bodo s proračunskimi sredstvi za leto 2007 začeli izvajati trije novi okvirni programi: „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“, „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ ter „Varnost in varstvo svoboščin“.
But is not clear if these two figures can be compared at all as Budget 2007 will see the launch of three new framework programmes: "Fundamental Rights and Justice", "Solidarity and Management of Migration flows" and "Security and Safeguarding Liberties"
Vključevanje migrantov in upravljanje meja
The integration of migrants and border management
Upravljanje migracijskih tokov je svetovno politično vprašanje.
Management of migratory flows is a global political issue.
Mednarodna organizacija za migracije (IOM) v publikacijah, kot je poročilo o svetovnih migracijah,
Publications such as the World Migration Report
Na voljo na naslovu http://www.iom.int/en/news/prwmr2005%5Fpresskit%5Fen.shtml. ki izhaja vsaki dve leti, daje velik poudarek spremljanju večjih sprememb v migracijskih trendih.
Available via http://www.iom.int/en/news/prwmr2005%5Fpresskit%5Fen.shtml produced every two years by the International Organisation for Migration highlight monitor the major developments in migration trends.
Najnovejše poročilo za leto 2005 opozarja, da je po ocenah migrantov kakih 175 milijonov, kar je približno 2,9 odstotka svetovnega prebivalstva.
The most recent 2005 report highlights that the estimated 175 million international migrants represent around 2.9 percent of the global population.
V Evropi je vprašanje migrantov še posebej pomembno v Španiji, kjer se ukvarjajo predvsem s priseljevanjem iz Afrike.
In the current European debate, the situation regarding migrants is a particularly important topic in Spain, where attention has focused on movements of people from the continent of Africa.
Evropski parlament je v odstavku 22 resolucije o letni strategiji politik poudaril, „da se je treba v prihodnjih letih posvetiti vključevanju migrantov in upravljanju meja“ in da „namerava v proračunu za leto 2007 zagotoviti ustrezna sredstva v ta namen, tako da bo upravljanje zunanjih meja Unije ob razširitvi schengenskega območja potekalo v znamenju načela solidarnosti Skupnosti“.
The APS resolution (paragraph 22): "stresses that the objective of the integration of migrants and border management is of importance in the years to come; intends to provide sufficient means in 2007 to ensure that the extension of the Schengen area is flanked by the principle of Community solidarity in the management of the Union's external borders".
Za program „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“, ki predstavlja večji del odhodkov, je v proračunski vrstici 18 03 03 predhodnega predloga proračuna predvidenih 60 milijonov EUR,
Concerning the main element of spending, "Solidarity and Management of Migration flows", EUR 60 million have been foreseen in PDB2007 for Budget line 18 03 03
Komisija napačno navaja SEC(2006)231, dokument I, točko 3.4, str.
The Commission wrongly states (SEC(2006)231, document I, point 3.4, p.26): "In the field of migration, from 2007, the main financing instruments will be the European Refugee Fund (EUR 61,3 million) " , although the new specific programme "European Refugee Fund" will take effect only as of Budget 2008.
Ker je Parlament v resoluciji o letni strategiji politik poudaril velik pomen vključevanja migrantov in učinkovitega upravljanja meja in ker vprašanja v zvezi z migracijo pogosto pritegnejo veliko politične pozornosti, bi bilo morda smiselno podrobneje preučiti, ali je za solidarnost ter upravljanje migracijskih tokov in sklada za begunce zagotovljenih dovolj proračunskih sredstev.
Given the importance attached to the integration of migrants and the effective management of borders in the APS resolution and in light of the political attention that migration issues frequently attract, one might examine in more detail the degree to which the budgetary situation regarding solidarity and management of migration flows and the European Refugee Fund is satisfactory.
Druga področja porabe v podrazdelku 3a in povezana vprašanja
Other areas of spending in Heading 3a and related issues
Malce nejasno je, zakaj Komisija v okviru splošnega programa „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“ predlaga posebni program „Temeljne pravice in državljanstvo “,
It is confusing to note that under the general programme "Fundamental rights and justice" a specific programme "Fundamental rights and citizenship "
CNS 2005/0038 saj se ta program tako ne financira iz podrazdelka 3b („Državljanstvo“), temveč iz podrazdelka 3a.
CNS2005/0038 is proposed by the Commission which is not financed under subheading 3b - Citizenship, but under subheading 3a.
Če si podrobneje ogledamo razporeditev sredstev za druge ukrepe in programe, se izkaže, da je 68 milijonov EUR od skupnih 78,4 milijona EUR razporejenih v vrstici 18 02 04 in 18 02 05, namenjeni financiranju schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)
Looking more closely at "Other actions and programmes", EUR 68 million out of EUR 78,4 million is due to go to lines 18 02 04 and 05, called Schengen information system (SIS II)
KOM(2005)236, Coelhovo poročilo in vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS).
COM(2005)236 report COELHO and Visa information system (VIS)
Sistem VIS je prav tako podatkovna zbirka, namenjena pa je preprosti izmenjavi podatkov v zvezi s skupno vizumsko politiko in konzularnemu sodelovanju med državami članicami pri obravnavanju vlog.
VIS also is a database facilitating the exchange of data concerning the common visa policy and consular cooperation between Member States on applications in order to prevent threats to internal security of any of the Member States, to prevent the bypassing of the criteria for application and to facilitate the fight against fraud and to assist in the identification and return of illegal immigrants.
Tako naj bi preprečili grožnje notranji varnosti držav članic, onemogočili, da se prosilci izognejo zahtevam za pridobitev vizuma, pospešili boj proti goljufijam ter olajšali identifikacijo in vračanje nezakonitih priseljencev.
Whereas the objectives for these two actions can be fully subscribed to, important budgetary questions remain.
Čeprav sta cilja teh dveh ukrepov povsem upravičena, ostaja nerešenih nekaj pomembnih proračunskih vprašanj.
For example, in the financial statement of the proposal, EUR 14,4 million and EUR 24 million have been foreseen for SIS II and VIS.
V finančnem izkazu predloga je na primer za SIS II predvidenih 14,4, za VIS pa 24 milijonov EUR, v predhodnem predlogu proračuna za leto 2007 pa je v proračunskih vrsticah 18 02 04 in 18 02 05 v ta namen predvidenih 20 oziroma 48 milijonov EUR.
However, in the PDB 2007, budget lines 18 02 04 and 18 02 05 foresee EUR 20 million and EUR 48, million respectively.
Zelo dobro bi bilo, če bi se te razlike pojasnilo.
It would be interesting to have further information as to what explains these differences.
Komisija je predstavila posebno poročilo o pilotnih projektih in pripravljalnih ukrepih (člen 49, točka 2b finančne uredbe), KOM(2006)300, str.
Actions (article 49, point 2 letter b of the Financial Regulation)", COM(2006)300, p.
Razlog za to utegne biti vključitev nekaterih prejšnjih pilotnih programov in pripravljalnih ukrepov v nove programe (na primer boj proti terorizmu).
This could reflect the integration of several of the previous pilot schemes and preparatory actions into the new generation of programmes (e.g. terrorism).
Komisija ocenjuje, da takšna rešitev prinaša dovolj možnosti za nove ukrepe.
The Commission considers that this leaves ample scope for new actions.
Edini pilotni projekt v podrazdelku 3a je boj proti terorizmu.
The only pilot project under heading 3a is "Fight against Terrorism".
Znesek v ta namen je:
The figures are as follows:
Odgovorni GD
DG responsible
Podrazdelek 3a
HEADING 3a
Delna vsota podrazdelka 3a:
Sub-total heading 3a
Glavni cilj tega projekta je učinkovitejše preprečevanje terorističnih akcij v EU, kar bo mogoče doseči s tesnejšim sodelovanjem in usklajevanjem protiterorističnih dejavnosti med obveščevalnimi in varnostnimi organi in organi kazenskega pregona v posameznih državah članicah ter Europolom in delovno skupino evropskih vodij policije, zlasti kar zadeva izvajanje nekaterih delov akcijskega načrta EU za boj proti terorizmu ter haaškega večletnega programa za utrditev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji.
It's main objective is to enhance the EU’s effectiveness in preventing terrorist acts, by improving co-operation and co-ordination of counter-terrorism activities between Member States’ intelligence, security and law enforcement services, Europol and the Task Force of EU Police Chiefs, in particular as regards the implementation of the relevant elements in the EU Action Plan to combat terrorism and the Hague multi-annual programme for strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union.
Nadaljevanje tega pripravljalnega ukrepa očitno v letu 2007 ni predvideno, saj naj bi bil vključen v splošni program „Varnost in varstvo svoboščin“, ki naj bi ga Parlament obravnaval v postopku soodločanja.
A continuation of this preparatory action is apparently not foreseen in 2007, as it should be integrated into the general programme "Security and safeguarding liberties", co-decided by Parliament.