natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Cilj Uredbe je natančno opredeljen v členu 1: "Skupnost financira ukrepe za pospeševanje miru in stabilnosti ter za zagotavljanje varnosti in zaščite civilnega prebivalstva v tretjih državah in na ozemljih v skladu z določbami te uredbe."
The objective of the regulation is stated precisely in Article 1: 'The Community shall finance measures to promote peace and stability and assure the safety and security of the civilian population in third countries and territories in line with the provisions of this Regulation.'
Iz vsebine predloge je jasno razviden namen zagotoviti finančno, gospodarsko in tehnično pomoč, ki dopolnjuje pomoč, običajno predvideno v skladu z instrumentom za humanitarno pomoč, z integriranim predpristopnim instrumentom, z evropskim sosedskim in partnerskim instrumentom ter z instrumentom za razvojno sodelovanje in gospodarsko sodelovanje (člen 2).
The substance of the proposal is clearly concerned with providing financial, economic and technical assistance complementary to any assistance that is normally provided for under the Humanitarian Aid instrument, the Integrated Pre-accession instrument, the European Neighbourhood and Partnership instrument and the Development Cooperation and Economic Cooperation instrument (Article 2).
Člen 308 Pogodbe ES Skupnosti omogoča prilagoditev pooblastil glede na področje pristojnosti in doseganje ciljev Pogodbe.
Article 308 of the EC Treaty permits the Community to adjust its powers in the light of the powers and with a view to attaining the objectives of the Treaty.
Da bi navedeni člen uporabili za pravno podlago akta je treba v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti izpolnjevati naslednje pogoje:
In order to take the aforementioned article as a legal basic for a legislative instrument, the Court of Justice has consistently held that the following conditions must be met:
· načrtovani ukrepi morajo doprinesti k doseganju enega od ciljev Skupnost;
● the action envisaged must have the aim of attaining one of the objectives of the Community;
· načrtovani ukrepi morajo biti potrebni za dosego tega cilja;
● the action must be necessary for the attainment of that objective;
· v Pogodbi ne smejo biti predvidena drugačnih pooblastil za delovanje v ta namen.
● the Treaty must not otherwise confer powers to act for this purpose.
Preučitev predmeta in vsebine predloga pokaže, da se civilni vidiki odziva na krizne situacije bolj nanašajo na člena 179 in 181(A) Pogodbe ES, zato uporaba člena 308 Pogodbe ES za pravno podlago ni upravičena.
From a consideration of the subject and substance of the proposal it may be concluded that the civil aspects of tackling crises fall rather under Articles 179 and 181a of the EC Treaty, which does not justify the choice of Article 308 of the EC Treaty as a legal basis.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je torej sklenil, da ustrezno pravno podlago predstavljata člena 179 in 181(A) Pogodbe ES in da je, upoštevajoč nezdružljivosti teh členov in člena 203 Pogodbe Euratom, potrebno podati ločen predlog kar zadeva vidike, izhajajoče iz ukrepov na področju jedrske varnosti.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs has accordingly concluded that Articles 179 and 181a of the EC Treaty are the appropriate legal basis and that, in view of the incompatibility between those articles and Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty, it is necessary to submit a separate proposal concerning the aspects relating to nuclear safety measures.
Posledično se uporabi postopek soodločanja.
The codecision procedure would therefore apply.
Ob upoštevanju vsega navedenega in na predlog poročevalca o pravni podlagi Antonia López-Istúriza Whitea je Odbor za pravne zadeve na svoji seji dne 13. julija 2005 soglasno sklenil, da:
At its meeting of 13 July 2005 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
· bi se za pravno podlago zadevnega predloga Uredbe morala uporabiti člena 179 in 181(A) Pogodbe ES in ne člen 308 Pogodbe ES;
● the legal basis for the above proposal for a regulation should be Articles 179 and 181a of the EC Treaty, not Article 308 of the EC Treaty;
· upoštevajoč nezdružljivost teh členov in člena 203 Pogodbe Euratom bo morala Komisija podati ločen predlog kar zadeva vidike, izhajajoče iz ukrepov na področju jedrske varnosti.
● in view of the incompatibility between those articles and Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty, the Commission should submit a separate proposal concerning the aspects involving nuclear safety measures.
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj *
OPINION of the Committee on Development (*)
Instrument za stabilnost je eden od štirih novih instrumentov zunanje pomoči, ki jih Komisija predlaga v „Prodijevem paketu“.
The Instrument for Stability is one of the four new external-assistance instruments proposed by the Commission in the 'Prodi package'.
Njegova posebnost je, da je tematski instrument, medtem ko so ostali trije instrumenti geografski.
Unlike the other three (which are geographically based), it is a thematic instrument.
Namen instrumenta za stabilnost je pridobivanje hitrih in prilagodljivih odzivov, integriranih v krizni položaj v tretji državi, z edinstvenim pravnim instrumentom, dokler ne bi bilo mogoče vzpostaviti normalnega sodelovanja v okviru drugih instrumentov financiranja zunanjih zadev.
The purpose of the Instrument for Stability is to provide a rapid, flexible and integrated response to crisis situations in third countries by means of a single legal instrument, until such time as normal cooperation can be resumed under one of the other instruments used for financing external relations.
Dejansko se odzive na krizni položaj, kot je v Afganistanu ali Iraku, lahko sproži z več kot sedmimi različnimi finančnimi instrumenti EU, od katerih ima vsak lastne postopke sprejemanja odločitev in lastne proračunske omejitve.
As things stand at present, responses to crisis situations (such as those in Afghanistan and Iraq) may be triggered by means of no fewer than seven different EU financial instruments, each of which has its own decision-making procedures and its own budget constraints.
Instrument za stabilnost želi uskladiti in poenotiti mehanizme odzivov na krizne položaje in izboljšati odziv glede na take položaje.
The Instrument for Stability will serve to consolidate and unify the crisis-response mechanisms and hence to improve the response to crisis situations.
Razen takojšnjega odziva na krize instrument stabilnosti vključuje tudi dolgoročno sodelovanje v stabilnem okolju, da se obravnava globalne in čezmejne izzive, kot so civilna varnost (boj proti tihotapljenju, organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu), resne tehnološke težave ter razvoj zmogljivosti za vzdrževanje reda.
In addition to responses to immediate crises the Instrument for Stability covers long-term cooperation within a stable environment for the purpose of dealing with global and regional trans-border challenges such as civil security (combating the various forms of trafficking, organised crime and terrorism), major technological threats and the development of peacekeeping capability.
Zaradi omejitve dolžine obrazložitev bomo tu obravnavali le dve glavni predlagani spremembi:
Since there are limits imposed on the length of justifications, only the two main amendments proposed will be mentioned here.
– izključitev točk b) in c) člena 2 uredbe.
- exclusion of points (b) and (c) of Article 2 of the Regulation.
To mnenje predlaga umik vsega iz te uredbe, kar je povezano s stabilnim dolgoročnim sodelovanjem, da se lahko obravnava posebne globalne in čezmejne izzive (člen 2(b) in (c)).
In this opinion it is being proposed that the Regulation under consideration be stripped of everything which concerns long-term cooperation in a stable environment for the purpose of dealing with particular global and regional trans-border challenges (Article 2(b) and (c)).
Ne gre toliko za zavračanje teh pristojnosti kot takih, ampak za vpoklic tistih, ki se izvajajo v drugem, ustreznejšem okviru, kot pa je instrument za stabilnost.
It is not a question of rejecting such tasks as such but, rather, of calling for them to be performed within a more appropriate framework than the Instrument for Stability.
Kje in kako je mogoče te pristojnosti ponovno vključiti?
To where and by what means could those tasks be transferred?
Dve rešitvi:
Here are two possibilities:
– ali se med različne zemljepisne instrumente vključi kakovostne tematske programe.
- The tasks could be incorporated into the various geographical instruments as thematic programmes.
Geografski instrumenti nimajo premostitvenih klavzul, ki bi zagotavljale povezavo med različnimi geografskimi območji, ker predvideni program vključuje globalni, horizontalni, regionalni in čezmejni značaj (primerjaj člen 22 predloga ICDCE in člen 27 IEVP).
All the geographical instruments contain clauses which link their various geographical areas in cases where the programme envisaged is global, horizontal, regional or cross-border in nature (see Article 22 of the Development Cooperation and Economic Cooperation Instrument [DCECI] proposal and Article 27 of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument [ENPI]).
Parlament in svet bosta vpletena v opredelitev političnih ciljev in prednostnih nalog, dodeljenih tem tematskim programom v okviru postopka sprejemanja strateških dokumentov, predvidenih v geografskih finančnih instrumentih;
Parliament and the Council would be involved in determining the political objectives and priorities assigned to the thematic programmes pursuant to the thematic-strategy document-adoption procedure laid down in the geographical financial instruments.
– ali pa se jih vključi v okvir enotnega tematskega instrumenta, ki je v nastajanju.
- Alternatively, they could be placed within a single thematic framework instrument to be devised.
Ta vsebuje skupino tematskih programov, navedenih v Sporočilu Komisije z istim imenom
This would cover all the thematic programmes set out in the Commission Communication of the same name
Demokracija in človekove pravice, človeški in socialni razvoj, okolje in trajnostni razvoj naravnih virov, nedržavni dejavniki razvoja, varnost hrane, sodelovanje z industrializiranimi državami, preseljevanje in azil , katerim se doda še 8. tematski program za dolgoročno stabilnost.
Democracy and human rights, human and social development, the environment and sustainable management of natural resources, non-state development actors, food security, cooperation with industrialised countries, migration and asylum. , to which would be added an eighth thematic programme concerning long-term stability.
Ta rešitev bo uredila nevšečnosti presežne „zemljepisnosti“, ob upoštevanju transverzalnega značaja nekaterih programov ter ob upoštevanju cilja racionalizacije, ki jo je prikazala Komisija.
Such an arrangement would have the advantage of remedying the drawbacks of excessive 'geographisation' and of taking full account of the transversal nature of certain programmes without in any way neglecting the Commission's rationalisation objective.
– Navedba razlogov o izključitvi dejavnosti za ohranjanje miru in podpore vojaških in paravojaških operacij
- Explanations concerning the exclusion of peace-support operations and of any support for military or paramilitary operations
Odprava finančne in tehnične pomoči operacijam za vzdrževanje miru, ki jih vodijo tuji vojaški organi, tudi v primeru partnerstva z mednarodnimi, regionalnimi ali podregionalnimi organizacijami, ki delujejo pod okriljem Združenih narodov, je zaželeno iz več razlogov.
The withdrawal of financial and technical support for peacekeeping operations led by foreign armies (even in the case of a partnership with international, regional or sub-regional organisations operating under UN approval) would be desirable for a number of reasons.
Najprej je težko financirati vojaške operacije, tudi če gre za vzdrževanje miru, brez kakršnega koli predhodnega nadzora.
To start with, military operations (even peacekeeping ones) would be difficult to finance if there were no prior democratic scrutiny.
Ob upoštevanju nujnega in hitrega odziva Komisija deluje brez kakršnega koli političnega mandata Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
In view of the fact that responses need to be swift and urgent, the Commission would be acting without any political mandate from Parliament or the Council.
Komisija od nas zahteva, da damo proste roke pri podpiranju takšne ali takšne koalicije tuje vojske.
The Commission is asking Parliament to sign a blank cheque for the purpose of supporting such and such a coalition of foreign armies.
V navedbi razlogov o izbiri pravne osnove, je Komisija ugotovila, da operacije vzdrževanja miru ne morejo temeljiti le na členu 179 Pogodbe ES: „Civilni vidiki odziva na krizni položaj bi morali veljati za člena 179 in 181(a) Pogodbe ES.
In its explanations concerning the choice of the legal basis the Commission itself acknowledges that peacekeeping operations cannot be based solely on Article 179 of the EC Treaty: 'The civilian aspects of crisis response would normally come within the scope of Articles 179 and 181a of the EC Treaty.
Vendar določbe v zvezi s financiranjem operacij vzdrževanja miru, še zlasti, če prispevajo k ciljem iz členov 179 in 181(a) Pogodbe ES, upravičujejo izbiro člena 308 Pogodbe kot pravne osnove“.
However, the provisions relating to the financing of peace keeping, in particular, while clearly contributing to the objectives of Articles 179 and 181a, justify a legal basis in Article 308 of the Treaty.'
V nasprotju s tem, kar trdi Komisija, za vzdrževanje miru v Skupnosti ne obstaja noben precedenčni primer.
Contrary to what the Commission claims, there is no Community precedent relating to peacekeeping.
Mir v Afriki ne more biti precedenčni primer, ker temelji na členu 11 Sporazuma iz Cotonouja, ki je mešani mednarodni sporazum.
The Africa Peace Facility cannot serve as a precedent, since it is based on Article 11 of the Cotenou Agreement - which is a joint international agreement.
Razen tega se odločitve o financiranju miru v Afriki sprejemajo v skladu s postopkom Evropskega razvojnega sklada, to pomeni s sklepom odbora Evropskega razvojnega sklada, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic.
Furthermore, financing decisions in respect of the Africa Peace Facility are taken in accordance with EDF procedures (i.e. by means of a decision taken by the EDF Committee comprising representatives of the Member States).
Ti zaključki so v skladu s stališčem oddelka za operacije vzdrževanja miru pri OZN.
These conclusions are in line with the view taken by the UN's peacekeeping operations department.
Svet je dolgo zavračal sprejetje skupnih pristojnosti za vzdrževanje miru (vprašanje je že bilo postavljeno ob sprejetju mehanizma za hiter odziv).
The Council for a long time has refused to designate peacekeeping as a Community task (the question previously arose when the rapid-reaction mechanism was adopted.
Glede na Svet, so to pristojnosti, ki sodijo le na področje SZVP.
According to the Council, peacekeeping is a task which is specifically covered by the CFSP.
Člen 11§3 Pogodbe ES navaja, da je eden od ciljev SZVP: „vzdrževanje miru in krepitev mednarodne varnosti“.
In Article 11(3) of the EU Treaty it is stated that one of the CFSP's objectives is 'to preserve peace and strengthen international security'.
Končno, sprejetje instrumenta, katerega krhke pristojnosti uvajajo neverjetno pravno nestabilnost v zvezi s to uredbo.
Lastly, the adoption of an instrument with such fragile powers would introduce significant legal uncertainty as regards the legality of the Regulation.
Če država članica želi proti tej uredbi vložiti zahtevek za razveljavitev zaradi izključitve sodne pristojnosti ali zaradi pomanjkanja pravne osnove, se zdi, da nad veljavnostjo uredbe visi Damoklejev meč, vse dokler Sodišče ne sprejme sklepa.
If one of the Member States were to seek to have the Regulation declared null and void on the grounds of incompetence or lack of a legal basis, a sword of Damocles would hang over the validity of the Regulation during the long years which it would take for the Court in order to issue a ruling.
Odbor za razvoj poziva Odbor za zunanje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Naslov in uvodne navedbe
Title and citations
UREDBA SVETA
COUNCIL REGULATION
UREDBA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL REGULATION
o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za stabilnost
establishing an Instrument for Stability
SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE JE – ,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
EVROPSKI PARLAMENT IN SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE STA – ,
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 179 in 181a Pogodbe ,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 179 and 181a thereof,
Po tristranskih pogajanjih so vse tri ustanove določile spremembo pravne osnove.
Following the trilogue negotiations the three institutions decided that the legal basis would be changed.
Instrument za stabilnost izvira iz pravne podlage člena 308 ES, odslej pa bo temeljil na členih 179 in 181A ES.
The Instrument for Stability was originally founded on the general legal basis provided by Article 308 of the EC Treaty but it will in future be based on Articles 179 and 181a of the EC Treaty.
Posledično smo po tej koreniti spremembi podlage od Komisije zahtevali, da predloži nov predlog, ki izhaja iz spremembe področja pristojnosti.
In the wake of this radical change the Commission was asked to submit a fresh proposal incorporating the modifications which would have to be made as a result.
Komisija je to zavrnila zaradi razloga, da ima Parlament moč spremeniti to besedilo in iz njega sestaviti enake posledice .
The Commission refused on the grounds that Parliament was fully entitled to amend the text and to incorporate those modifications itself.
(22) Zaradi vzpostavitve novega instrumenta za stabilnost je treba razveljaviti Uredbo (ES) št. 1724/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. julija 2001 o ukrepih zoper protipehotne kopenske mine v državah v razvoju; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1725/2001 z dne 23. julija 2001 o ukrepih za boj proti protipehotnim minam v tretjih državah z izjemo držav v razvoju; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 381/2001 z dne 26. februarja 2001 o oblikovanju mehanizma za hitro ukrepanje; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2046/97 z dne 13. oktobra 1997 o sodelovanju sever–jug v boju proti mamilom in odvisnosti od mamil; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2258/96 z dne 22. novembra 1996 o aktivnostih obnove in rehabilitacije v državah v razvoju; 2001/824/ES, Euratom: Sklep Sveta z dne 16. novembra 2001 o nadaljnjem prispevku Evropske skupnosti Evropski banki za obnovo in razvoj za Sklad za zaščitno zgradbo v Černobilu; Uredbo (ES) št. 2130/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. oktobra 2001 o ukrepih za pomoč osebam, ki so prisiljene zapustiti svoje domove v azijskih in latinskoameriških državah v razvoju; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1080/2000 z dne 22. maja 2000 o podpori Začasni misiji Združenih narodov na Kosovu (UNMIK) ter Uradu visokega predstavnika v Bosni in Hercegovini (OHR).
(22) The establishment of a new instrument for stability makes it necessary to repeal Regulation (EC) No 1724/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2001 concerning action against anti-personnel landmines in developing countries; Council Regulation (EC) No 1725/2001 of 23 July 2001 concerning action against anti-personnel landmines in third countries other than developing countries; Council Regulation (EC) No 381/2001 of 26 February 2001 creating a rapid-reaction mechanism; Council Regulation (EC) No 2046/97 of 13 October 1997 on north-south cooperation in the campaign against drugs and drug addiction; Council Regulation (EC) No 2258/96 of 22 November 1996 on rehabilitation and reconstruction operations in developing countries; 2001/824/EC,Euratom: Council Decision of 16 November 2001 on a further contribution of the European Community to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development for the Chernobyl Shelter Fund; Regulation (EC) No 2130/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 October 2001 on operations to aid uprooted people in Asian and Latin American developing countries; Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2000 of 22 May 2000 on support for the United Nations Interim Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) and the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina (OHR).
(22) Zaradi vzpostavitve novega instrumenta za stabilnost je treba razveljaviti Uredbo (ES) št. 1724/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. julija 2001 o ukrepih zoper protipehotne kopenske mine v državah v razvoju; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1725/2001 z dne 23. julija 2001 o ukrepih za boj proti protipehotnim minam v tretjih državah z izjemo držav v razvoju; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 381/2001 z dne 26. februarja 2001 o oblikovanju mehanizma za hitro ukrepanje; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2046/97 z dne 13. oktobra 1997 o sodelovanju sever–jug v boju proti mamilom in odvisnosti od mamil; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2258/96 z dne 22. novembra 1996 o aktivnostih obnove in rehabilitacije v državah v razvoju; Uredbo (ES) št. 2130/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. oktobra 2001 o ukrepih za pomoč osebam, ki so prisiljene zapustiti svoje domove v azijskih in latinskoameriških državah v razvoju; Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1080/2000 z dne 22. maja 2000 o podpori Začasni misiji Združenih narodov na Kosovu (UNMIK) ter Uradu visokega predstavnika v Bosni in Hercegovini (OHR).
(22) The establishment of a new instrument for stability makes it necessary to repeal Regulation (EC) No 1724/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2001 concerning action against anti-personnel landmines in developing countries; Council Regulation (EC) No 1725/2001 of 23 July 2001 concerning action against anti-personnel landmines in third countries other than developing countries; Council Regulation (EC) No 381/2001 of 26 February 2001 creating a rapid-reaction mechanism; Council Regulation (EC) No 2046/97 of 13 October 1997 on north-south cooperation in the campaign against drugs and drug addiction; Council Regulation (EC) No 2258/96 of 22 November 1996 on rehabilitation and reconstruction operations in developing countries; Regulation (EC) No 2130/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 October 2001 on operations to aid uprooted people in Asian and Latin American developing countries; Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2000 of 22 May 2000 on support for the United Nations Interim Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) and the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina (OHR).
Sprememba pravne osnove napeljuje na to, da bi s področja, ki ga pokriva instrument, umaknili kakršen koli element sodelovanja na jedrskem področju.
The change in the legal basis means that nothing relating to cooperation in the nuclear field may fall within the scope of the Instrument.
Skupnost financira ukrepe za pospeševanje miru in stabilnosti ter za zagotavljanje varnosti in zaščite civilnega prebivalstva v tretjih državah in na ozemljih v skladu z določbami te uredbe.
The Community shall finance measures to promote peace and stability and assure the safety and security of the civilian population in third countries and territories in line with the provisions of this Regulation.
Skupnost upravlja sheme za razvojno pomoč in sheme, ki vključujejo gospodarsko, finančno in tehnično sodelovanje s tretjimi državami za spodbujanje miru in stabilnosti ter zagotavljanje varnosti in zaščite civilnega prebivalstva v državah, na ozemljih in področjih v skladu z določbami te uredbe.
The Community shall engage in development-aid schemes and schemes involving economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries with a view to promoting peace and stability and assuring the safety and security of the civilian populations in the countries, territories and areas concerned.
Ti ukrepi zlasti podpirajo politike EU v zvezi z:
Such measures shall in particular support the policies of the EU relating to: