natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti člen 4 in naslov V.
Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities, and in particular Article 4 and Title V thereof.
Ta sredstva so namenjena kritju osebnih prejemkov in prispevkov delodajalca za socialno varnost lokalnega osebja ter drugih stranskih izdatkov.
This appropriation is intended to cover the remuneration and the employer's share of social security contributions of local staff and other ancillary expenditure.
Člen 1 1 3 — Zdravstveno zavarovanje, nezgodno zavarovanje, zavarovanje za primer poklicne bolezni, brezposelnosti in ohranitev pokojninskih pravic.
Article 1 1 3 — Insurance against sickness, accidents and occupational disease, unemployment and maintenance of pension rights
Postavka 1 1 3 0 — Zdravstveno zavarovanje
Item 1 1 3 0 — Insurance against sickness
Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti člen 72.
Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities, and in particular Article 72 thereof.
Pravilnik o zdravstvenem zavarovanju uradnikov Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti člen 23.
Rules on sickness insurance for officials of the European Communities, and in particular Article 23 thereof.
Ta sredstva so namenjena kritju prispevkov delodajalca za zdravstveno zavarovanje (3,4 % osnovne plače).
This appropriation is intended to cover the employer's contribution to sickness insurance (3,4 % of the basic salary).
Prispevek v breme uradnika znaša 1,7 % osnovne plače.
The officials' contribution is 1,7 % of the basic salary.
Postavka 1 1 3 1 — Nezgodno zavarovanje in zavarovanje za primer poklicne bolezni
Item 1 1 3 1 — Insurance against accidents and occupational disease
Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti èlen 73 in clen 15 Priloge VIII.
Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities, and in particular Article 73 thereof and Article 15 of Annex VIII thereto.
Ta sredstva so namenjena kritju izdatkov za:
This appropriation is intended to cover:
prispevek delodajalca za nezgodno zavarovanje in zavarovanje za primer poklicne bolezni (0,87 % osnovne plače),
— the employer's contribution to insurance against the risk of accidents and occupational diseases (0,87 % of the basic salary),
premije za zavarovanje proti nezgodam med športnim udejstvovanjem pomočnikov poslancev in pomožnega osebja v športnem središču Evropskega parlamenta v Bruslju ter Strasbourgu.
— the insurance premiums in respect of sports accidents for Members' assistants and auxiliary staff using the European Parliament's sports centre in Brussels and in Strasbourg.
Postavka 1 1 3 2 — Zavarovanje za primer brezposelnosti za začasno osebje
Item 1 1 3 2 — Insurance against unemployment for temporary staff
Pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti elen 28a.
Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities, and in particular Article 28a thereof.
Ta sredstva so namenjena kritju prispevkov institucije v posebne sklade za primer brezposelnosti na osnovi zgoraj omenjenega člena 28a(7).
This appropriation is intended to cover the institution's contribution to the special unemployment funds under the abovementioned Article 28a(7).
Člen 1 1 5 — Nadurno delo
Article 1 1 5 — Overtime
Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti člen 56 in Priloga VI.
Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities, and in particular Article 56 thereof and Annex VI thereto.
Ta sredstva so namenjena kritju plačila nadurnega dela v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi doloebami.
This appropriation is intended for the payment of overtime pursuant to the abovementioned provisions.
Člen 1 1 9 — Sredstva za uskladitve plač uradnikov
Article 1 1 9 — Appropriations intended to cover adjustments to officials' salaries
Postavka 1 1 9 1 — Začasna sredstva
Item 1 1 9 1 — Provisional appropriation
Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti člen 65 in Priloga XI.
Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities, and in particular Article 65 thereof and Annex XI thereto.
Ta sredstva so namenjena kritju izdatkov za uskladitev plač, ki jo je Svet odobril med proračunskim letom.
This appropriation is intended to cover the impact of any salary adjustments agreed by the Council during the financial year.
Ta sredstva so začasna in se lahko uporabijo le po prerazporeditvi v ustrezne postavke tega poglavja v skladu s Finančno uredbo.
This appropriation is purely provisional and may only be used after its transfer to other headings in accordance with the Financial Regulation.
Načrt odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta za Spremembe proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005 (prilagoditev plač)
The estimates of the European Parliament for an Amending Budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005 (salary adjustment)
člena 272 pogodbe ES in 177 pogodbe Euratom
Articles 272 EC and 177 Euratom
o financiranju programa Natura 2000
on Financing Natura 2000
MNENJE ODBORA ZA KMETIJSTVO IN RAZVOJ PODEŽELJA.......................................12
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...13
MNENJE ODBORA ZA REGIONALNI RAZVOJ..................................................................16
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................17
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu – financiranje programa Natura 2000 ( KOM(2004)0431 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament - Financing Natura 2000 ( COM(2004)0431 ),
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije o biotski raznovrstnosti,
– having regard to the Convention on Biological Diversity,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic
– having regard to Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 20. oktobra 1998 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o strategiji Evropske skupnosti za biotsko raznovrstnost
– having regard to its resolution of 20 October 1998 on the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on a European Community biodiversity strategy
UL C 341, 9.11.1998, str.
OJ C 341, 9.11.1998, p.41. ,
UL C 262, 18.9.2001, str.
OJ C 262, 18.9.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa Skupnosti
– having regard to the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 14. marca 2002 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o akcijskih načrtih biotske raznovrstnosti na območjih ohranjanja naravnih virov, kmetijstva in ribištva ter razvojnem in gospodarskem sodelovanju
– having regard to its resolution of 14 March 2002 on the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the biodiversity action plans in the areas of conservation of natural resources, agriculture, fisheries, and development and economic cooperation
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ter mnenj Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6‑0049/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Agriculture and the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0049/2005 ),
A. ker so se na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Gothenburgu junija 2001
A. whereas at the European Council meeting in Gothenburg in June 2001
Sklepi predsedstva na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Gothenburgu z dne 15. in 16. junija 2001. voditelji držav in vlad zavezali, da bodo zaustavili izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti v Evropski uniji do leta 2010,
Presidency Conclusions of the Gothenburg European Council 15 and 16 June 2001. , European Heads of State and Government made a commitment to reverse the decline of biodiversity in the European Union by the year 2010,
B. ker šesti okoljski akcijski program določa cilj o „zaščiti in kjer je potrebno obnovi strukture in financiranja naravnih sistemov in zaustavitve izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 v Evropski uniji in po svetu“
B. whereas the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme specifies the objective to 'protect and where necessary restore the structure and funding of natural systems and halt the loss of biodiversity, both in the European Union and on a global scale by 2010'
Sklep št. 1600/2002/ES E vropskega parlamenta in Sveta o šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti (UL L 242, 10.9.2002, str.
Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme (OJ L 242, 10.9.2002, p.
C. ker je svetovni vrh o trajnostnem razvoju v Johannesburgu leta 2002 priznal, da ima raznovrstnost odločilno vlogo v celotnem trajnostnem razvoju in odpravi revščine ter je bistvena za naš planet, zdravje in preživetje ter kulturno integriteto ljudi; in ker je načrt za izvajanje iz Johannesburga potrdil globalni cilj o doseganju znatnega znižanja sedanje stopnje izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010,
C. whereas the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in 2002 recognised that biodiversity plays a critical role in overall sustainable development and poverty eradication, and is essential to our planet, human well-being and the livelihood and cultural integrity of people; and whereas the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation confirmed the global objective of achieving a significant reduction in the current rate of loss of biological diversity by 2010,
D. ker je omrežje zaščitenih območij Natura 2000, sestavljeno iz področij, ki so jih določile direktive o habitatih in pticah, glavna opora ukrepa Skupnosti za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti,
D. whereas the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, made up of sites designated under the Community Birds and Habitats directives, is a key pillar of Community action for the conservation of biodiversity,
E. ker je v preteklosti večina držav članic po sedanji uredbi o razvoju podeželja omejila izkoriščanje priložnosti za izvajanje programa Natura 2000; ker sta programa za regionalni razvoj in razvoj podeželja pogosto delovala proti prednostnim nalogam ohranjanja narave v EU,
E. whereas in the past most Member States have made limited use of the opportunities under the current rural development regulation to implement Natura 2000; whereas rural development and regional development programmes have often worked against EU nature conservation priorities,
F. ker lahko kmetje in lastniki gozdov s svojim načinom gospodarjenja pomembno prispevajo k ohranitvi in trajnostni rabi biološke raznovrstnosti na kmetijskih površinah; mnogokrat je to povezano z dodatnimi stroški, ki jih je treba ustrezno kompenzirati,
F. whereas farmers and forest owners can make a significant contribution to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity on farmland through their management practices, and in many cases this results in additional spending which must be adequately compensated,
G. ker znaša leta 2004, od skupnega proračuna EU v vrednosti 111,3 milijarde EUR, pokrivanje stroškov za kmetijske trge in neposredna plačila s strani EU 40,2 milijarde EUR, v primerjavi s 6,5 milijarde EUR za politiko razvoja podeželja; ker je sedanja politika razvoja podeželja še vedno usmerjena k ciljem strukturne politike in ne k zagotovitvi varstva narave ter podpiranju okolju prijaznih in trajnostnih kmetijskih praks,
G. whereas in 2004, out of a total EU budget of EUR 111.3 billion, EU funding for agricultural market expenditure and direct aid amounts to EUR 40.2 billion, compared to EUR 6.5 billion for rural development policy; whereas the present rural development policy is still geared towards structural policy objectives, rather than ensuring nature protection and supporting environmentally friendly and sustainable farming practices,
H. ker predlogi Komisije za finančno perspektivo za obdobje 2007–2013 spoštujejo odločitev, ki jo je sprejel Svet leta 2002 v Bruslju, o zamrznjenju kmetijskih stroškov do leta 2006, z omogočeno letno prilagoditvijo stopnje inflacije za 1%; ker ti predlogi predvidevajo znesek 301 milijard EUR za pokrivanje tržnih stroškov v kmetijstvu in izvajanje neposrednih plačil (povprečno 43 milijard EUR na leto) ter znesek 88,75 milijarde EUR za ukrepe za razvoj podeželja (povprečno 12,6 milijarde EUR); ker zneski za razvoj podeželja vključujejo ukrepe EKUJS, prej financirane iz strukturnih skladov,
H. whereas the Commission proposals for the financial perspective covering the period 2007-2013 respects the decision taken by the Council in 2002 in Brussels to freeze agricultural expenditure at the 2006 level, allowing for a yearly adaptation for inflation of 1%; whereas these proposals thus foresee an amount of EUR 301 billion for agricultural spending on market expenditure and direct payments (on average EUR 43 billion per year) and an amount of EUR 88.75 billion for rural development measures (on average EUR 12.6 billion); whereas the amounts for rural development include EAGGF measures formerly financed under Structural Funds,
I. ker je bil proračun za take ukrepe zamrznjen do leta 2006, kljub dejstvu, da Evropski svet leta 2002 ni določil nobenih omejitev ukrepov za razvoj podeželja, proračunska sredstva pa je namenil le Bolgariji in Romuniji, kar brez ustreznega povečanja proračuna ne bo omogočilo dodatne nove velike naloge, kot je sofinanciranje upravljanja programa Natura 2000,
I. whereas, despite the fact that in 2002 the European Council had not set any ceilings on rural development measures, the budget for such measures has also been frozen at the level of 2006, only adding appropriations for Bulgaria and Romania, which will not allow for the addition of a new major task such as co-financing the managing of the Natura 2000 network without a corresponding increase in the budget,
J. ker Komisija ocenjuje letne stroške upravljanja z programom Natura 2000 na 6,1 milijarde EUR na leto, brez upoštevanja zaščitenih morskih območij,
J. whereas the Commission estimates the annual costs of managing the Natura 2000 network at EUR 6.1 billion per year, without taking into account marine protected areas,
K. ker so se države članice v Malahidu (27. maja 2004) dogovorile, da morajo biti ustanovljeni programi, ki Skupnosti zagotovijo ustrezno in zajamčeno sofinanciranje programa Natura 2000, in ker sporočilo iz Malahida trdi, da „mora to med drugim vključevati povečanje financiranja projekta Life Natura v novem finančnem inštrumentu za okolje poleg okrepljenega financiranja iz strukturnih skladov in skladov za razvoj podeželja“,
K. whereas the Member States agreed in Malahide (27 May 2004) that arrangements need to be established which ensure adequate and guaranteed Community co-financing for the Natura 2000 network, and whereas the Message from Malahide also states that "this should include inter alia the enhancement of Life-Nature funding in the new Financial Instrument for the Environment alongside enhanced funding from the structural and rural development funds",
L. ker Komisija, v svojem sporočilu o finančnih perspektivah za leta 2007–2013 ( KOM(2004)0487 ), navaja, da „bo Komisija od držav članic zahtevala dokaz o tem, kako so pri razvoju svojih nacionalnih programov na podlagi strukturnih skladov upoštevale potrebe po financiranju okolja, vključno s pomembnimi vidiki programa Natura 2000 …“,
L. whereas the Commission, in its communication on the Financial Perspectives for 2007-2013 ( COM(2004)0487 ), states that “the Commission will require Member States to show how they have taken the financing needs of the environment, including relevant aspects of Natura 2000, into account in developing their national programmes under the structural funds…”,
M. ker Evropska komisija v svojem sporočilu analizira tri različne scenarije za prihodnje financiranje programa Natura 2000,
M. whereas the European Commission analyses three different scenarios for the future financing of the Natura 2000 network in its communication
N. ponovno poziva, da sta se Komisija in Svet s sprejetjem Habitatne direktive leta 1992 obvezala, da lastniki in uporabniki zemljišč ne bodo nosili finančnega bremena, ki bo nastal zaradi ukrepov iz te direktive; posebej zahteva, da je treba izpolniti obljubo;
N. Recalls that the Commission and the Council, in adopting the Habitats Directive in 1992, made a clear commitment to ensure that landowners and landusers would not bear the financial burden of the measures in the directive; strongly urges that this promise be kept;
3. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za predlog strateškega pristopa k sofinanciranju programa Natura 2000 in izjavo komisarja Dimasa na Mednarodni konferenci „Biotska raznovrstnost, znanost in upravljanje“ 24. januarja 2005 v Parizu;
Welcomes the initiative of the Commission to propose a strategic approach to co-finance Natura 2000 and the statement made by Commissioner Dimas at the International Conference on "Biodiversity, Science and Governance" on 24 January 2005 in Paris;
6. vztraja, da financiranje Nature 2000 iz sklada za razvoj podeželja nujno vključuje ustrezno povečanje sredstev sklada;
Insists that if Natura 2000 expenditure is to be included in the Rural Development Fund, the endowment of the fund needs to be increased accordingly;
8. priznava, da pretekle izkušnje kažejo na omejen uspeh, čeprav celostni pristop ob robustnem izvajanju učinkuje; meni, da predlagane uredbe sklada za razvoj podeželja in strukturnega sklada ne izražajo ustreznih določb programa Natura 2000, ker ne upoštevajo želje sporočila in ogrožajo cilj biotske raznovrstnosti EU 2010, med drugim zaradi naslednjega:
Recognises that, while the integration approach might be effective if it is implemented in a robust manner, past experience shows success has been limited; considers that the proposed rural development and structural fund regulations fail to reflect adequate Natura 2000 provisions, failing to deliver upon the Communication’s ambition and putting the EU 2010 biodiversity target at risk, inter alia due to the following:
– posebna merila za geografska območja, ki so upravičena do podpore iz strukturnih skladov, bi izključevala nekatere najbolj ogrožene habitatne tipe in vrste;
- the specific criteria for geographic areas eligible for structural fund support would exclude some of the most endangered habitat types and species;
– ohranitev biotske raznovrstnosti doslej ni bila glavni cilj razvoja podeželja in strukturnih skladov ter lahko v lokalnem in regionalnem smislu celo nasprotuje drugim ciljem socialno-ekonomskega razvoja;
- biodiversity conservation has, until now, not been a major objective of rural development and structural funds, and may in a local and regional context even conflict with other socio-economic development objectives;
– sofinanciranje področij programa Natura 2000 bi neposredno konkuriralo drugim ekonomskim in socialnim projektom, kot so vseevropska omrežja ali strukturno prilagajanje v kmetijstvu;
- co-financing of Natura 2000 sites would compete directly with other economic and social projects, such as the Trans-European Networks or structural adjustment in farming;
– programiranje in upravljanje skladov za razvoj podeželja in strukturnih skladov je usmerjeno k pospeševanju regionalnega socialno-ekonomskega razvoja, uprave, odgovorne za njihovo upravljanje, pa imajo zdaj še vedno omejeno pristojnost za ohranjanje narave, ker jim primanjkuje strokovnega znanja, izkušenj in spretnosti, potrebnih za upravljanje projektov s cilji ohranjanja narave;
- the programming and management of rural development and structural funds is geared towards fostering regional socio-economic development, and the administrations responsible for managing them have, at the moment, still limited nature conservation competencies, lacking the expertise and skills required to manage projects with nature conservation objectives;
– jamstva, kot je sprostitev strukturnega financiranja, pogojenega z ustreznimi nacionalnimi načrti financiranja programa Natura 2000, niso predvidena, čeprav so določena v sporočilu o finančnih perspektivah;
- no guarantees such as making the release of structural funding conditional upon adequate national Natura 2000 financing plans are foreseen although stipulated in the Communication on the Financial Perspectives;
– strukturni, podeželski ali LIFE+ predlogi v sedanji obliki ne zagotavljajo najnižjega financiranja programa Natura 2000 ali dodatnega financiranja tistih sredstev, ki izražajo to prednostno nalogo;
- structural, rural or LIFE+ proposals in their present form do not guarantee minimum funding for Natura 2000 nor additional funding to those instruments reflecting this priority;
10. razdelitev teh sredstev mora biti sorazmerna med vsemi državami članicami (starimi in novimi) in mora upoštevati velikost ozemelj in stopnjo biotske raznovrstnosti teh območij;
The distribution of the funds in question should be proportionate among all the Member States (old and new ones) and should reflect the size of the territories and the degree of biodiversity of those sites;
12. poziva k spremembi predloga za uredbo Sveta, ki vsebuje splošne določbe o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu v zvezi z Naturo 2000, da se zagotovi primernost dejavnosti v okviru Nature 2000 za financiranje iz strukturnih skladov.
Calls for changes to the Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund to refer to Natura 2000 in order to ensure the eligibility of Natura 2000 activities for financing from the structural funds;
18. poudarja pomen sodelovanja nacionalnih parlamentov, socialnih partnerjev, civilne družbe in regionalnih ter lokalnih oblasti pri uresničevanju teh ciljev s pomočjo spodbujanja ustrezne javne razprave;
Stresses the importance of involving the national parliaments, the social partners, civil society and regional and local authorities in implementing these objectives, by encouraging promoting proper public consultation;
MNENJE ODBORA ZA KMETIJSTVO IN RAZVOJ PODEŽELJA
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
za Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano
for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Financiranje programa Natura 2000
on Financing Natura 2000
Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Agriculture calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker je namen programa Natura 2000, ki temelji na ukrepih, sprejetih v Ptičji direktivi
A. whereas the Natura 2000 network is intended to lead to a genuinely European nature conservation network, based on the measures adopted in the Birds Directive
Direktiva Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic (UL L 103, 25.4.1979, str.
Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
1). in Habitatni direktivi
1). and Habitats Directive
Direktiva Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst (UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
B. ker naj bi program Natura 2000 pokrivala 63,7 milijona hektarov in ocenjeni stroški letno predstavljali 6,1 milijarde evrov; ker mreža koristi celotni Uniji in je namenjena uresničevanju ciljev na ravni Skupnosti, ne sme pomeniti večje finančne obremenitve za tiste države članice, ki imajo večjo biološko raznolikost in večja varovana območja,
B. whereas the Natura 2000 network is expected to cover an area of 63,7 m hectares and the costs have been estimated at EUR 6,1 billion annually, and whereas, given that the network benefits the whole of the Union and is geared to objectives on a Community scale, it must not involve greater costs for those states containing greater biological diversity and a larger protected area,