natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Skupni odhodki za uporabo člena 8 (podporni ukrepi) ne presegajo 5 % celotnega proračuna za izvajanje te uredbe.
The total expenditure for application of Article 8 (Support measures) shall not exceed 5% of the total budget for implementing this Regulation.
Vsaj 66 % sredstev, namenjenih za izvajanje te uredbe, se dodeli za ukrepe nepridobitnih, nedržavnih akterjev, opredeljenih v členu 9(1).
At least 66% of funding for the implementation of this Regulation shall be earmarked for actions by non-profit, non-state actors as defined in Article 9(1).
Komisija do 31. decembra 2010 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo, v katerem je ovrednoteno izvajanje te uredbe v prvih treh letih, po potrebi z zakonodajnim predlogom , ki v instrument vpeljuje potrebne spremembe.
The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council, by 31 December 2010 , a report evaluating the implementation of this Regulation in the first three years , if appropriate with a legislative proposal introducing the necessary modifications to the instrument.
Komisija do 30. aprila 2009 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo, v katerem je ovrednoteno izvajanje te uredbe v prvih treh letih.
The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council, by 30 April 2009 , a report evaluating the implementation of this Regulation in the first three years .
Če se v postopku pregleda, pri katerem bo tesno sodeloval Evropski parlament, opredelijo nepravilnosti, ki zahtevajo prilagoditev te uredbe, Komisija predloži zakonodajni predlog , ki v instrument uvaja potrebne spremembe.
Should the review process, with which the European Parliament will be closely associated, identify dysfunctions that require an adaptation of this Regulation, the Commission shall submit a legislative proposal introducing the necessary modifications to the instrument.
Pogodba Evropske unije jasno določa, da je cilj skupne zunanje in varnostne politike razviti in utrditi demokracijo, pravno državo ter spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.
The Treaty on the European Union clearly states that the objectives of the common foreign and security policy is to develop and consolidate democracy and the rule of law, and the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Člen 11(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji
Article 11(1) TEU
Zakonodajni predlog posodablja enega od najbolj prepoznavnih instrumentov Evropske unije za doseganje tega cilja - posebni program demokracije in človekovih pravic.
The legislative proposal updates one of the most visible instruments the European Union has in order to achieve this objective - its dedicated Democracy and Human Rights programme.
V okviru prihodnje finančne perspektive 2007 – 2013 je Komisija predlagala poenostavljen sistem zagotavljanja zunanje pomoči Skupnosti ter predstavila šest instrumentov, tri s horizontalno sestavo in tri z geografskim področjem veljavnosti.
In the context of the next Financial Perspectives 2007-2013, the Commission proposed a simplified structure for the delivery of the Community's external assistance, presenting six instruments, three of them with a horizontal design and the other three with a geographical coverage.
Predlagala je nadomestitev sedanje zakonodaje s tematskim programom za demokracijo in človekove pravice znotraj okvira štirih od teh instrumentov in s črpanjem sredstev iz le-teh.
The proposal was to replace current legislation with a thematic programme on democracy and human rights, within the framework of and by drawing resources from four of these instruments.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta glede prihodnosti Evropskega instrumenta za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic (EIDHR), ki ga je oblikoval leta 1992, pa je bilo jasno že od samega začetka.
However, the position of the European Parliament regarding the future of the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), which it formed in 1992, was clear from the beginning.
Parlament je zahteval poseben instrument za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic, ne tematskega programa, saj je želel zagotoviti preglednost, neodvisnost, prožnost, skladnost in izvedljivost.
The Parliament requested a specific instrument, not a thematic programme, for the promotion of democracy and human rights, in order to guarantee the visibility, independence, flexibility, coherence and feasibility.
Sedanji predlog je tako rezultat dolgih pogajanj med institucijami in ne bi bil dosežen brez odločenosti in vztrajnosti Evropskega parlamenta.
The current proposal is thus the result of long negotiations between the institutions, and would not have been achieved without the determination and insistence of the European Parliament.
V predlog je bilo prav zaradi tega možno vključiti sporazume, dosežene v okviru drugih uredb glede cele vrste vprašanj, od splošnega okvira za izvajanje, upravičenosti, pravil o udeležbi in izvoru, pa vse do pogojev za pregled.
It has thus been possible to incorporate agreements reached for the other regulations on a variety of issues, ranging from the general framework for implementation, eligibility, rules of participation and of origin, as well as conditions for revision.
Struktura je sedaj podobna drugim instrumentom, kar omogoča poenostavitev in racionalizacijo postopkov upravljanja zunanje pomoči.
The structure is now similar to other instruments, contributing to the simplification and streamlining of external aid management procedures.
Uredba, ki temelji na nedavnih izkušnjah s prejšnjim Evropskim instrumentom za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic, bo imela globalen domet in bo posebej usmerjena v civilno družbo.
The regulation, based on recent experiences from the previous EIDHR, will have a global capacity, with a particular focus on civil society.
Tako kot pri prejšnjem instrumentu ne bo potrebna odobritev vlade gostiteljice za zagotavljanje pomoči.
Like its predecessor, assistance will not require host government consent.
Predlagani finančni referenčni znesek za izvajanje je 1.103.702 milijona EUR.
The financial reference amount for implementation is proposed to EUR 1.103, 702 million.
Predlagane obveznosti znašajo od 130.673 milijonov EUR za prvo leto (v primerjavi s 122 milijoni EUR za Evropski instrument za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic v proračunu 2006, ki so bili doseženi potem, ko je bil na pobudo Evropskega parlamenta znesek glede na predlog osnutka proračuna povečan za 31 milijonov ) do 151.873 milijonov v petem letu in 320.533 milijonov v zadnjem letu.
Commitments proposed range from EUR 130,673 million for the first year (compared to EUR 122 million EIDHR in the 2006 budget, achieved after an increase of EUR 31 million by the European Parliament, compared to the PDB) to EUR 151,873 the fifth year, and EUR 320',533 for the last year.
Splošna ocena predloga
General appraisal of the proposal
Evropska unija nedvomno potrebuje učinkovit instrument za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic, ki bo imel strateški in prožen pristop in bo dopolnjeval obstoječe instrumente in orodja.
Doubtless, the European Union needs an efficient instrument for promoting democracy and human rights, both strategic and flexible in its approach, and complementing existing instrument and tools.
Medtem ko delamo prve korake v tej smeri, je predlog še možno izboljšati.
While taking some steps in this direction, there is still room for improvements in the proposal.
Vrsta nedavnih študij o Evropskem instrumentu za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic
A series of recent studies into the EIDHR
Bertelsmann Foundation, Efficiency First: Towards a coherent EU strategy for Belarus (februar 2005); Centre For European Policy Studies, Promoting Democracy through Civil Society: How to step up the EU's policy towards the Eastern Neighbourhood (februar 2006); Centre For European Reform, Bulletin Issue 45, The EU needs a policy on Belarus (januar 2006); Centre For European Reform, Policy Brief, 'The EU's awkward neighbour: time for a new policy on Belarus' (marec 2006); Klub iz Madrida
Bertelsmann Foundation, Efficiency First: Towards a coherent EU strategy for Belarus (February 2005); Centre For European Policy Studies, Promoting Democracy through Civil Society: How to step up the EU's policy towards the Eastern Neighbourhood (February 2006); Centre For European Reform, Bulletin Issue 45, The EU needs a policy on Belarus (January 2006); Centre For European Reform, Policy Brief, 'The EU's awkward neighbour: time for a new policy on Belarus ' (March 2006); Club Of Madrid
The European Neighbourhood Policy as a Conflict Prevention Tool (junij 2006); Evropska komisija, KOM(2001) 252: Vloga EU pri spodbujanju človekovih pravic in demokratizacije v tretjih državah (maj 2001); Foreign Policy Centre, London: EU and Democracy Promotion in the Arab-Muslim world (november 2002); F.M Partners Limited (študija za vrsto nevladnih organizacij, ki spodbujajo demokracijo), Striking a balance: Efficiency, effectiveness and accountability.
The European Neighbourhood Policy as a Conflict Prevention Tool (June 2006); European Commission, COM(2001) 252: The EU's Role in Promoting Human Rights and Democratisation in Third Countries (May 2001); Foreign Policy Centre, London : EU and Democracy Promotion in the Arab-Muslim world (November 2002); F.M Partners Limited (Study for a number of pro-democracy NGOs ), Striking a balance: Efficiency, effectiveness and accountability.
To je v nasprotju z obdobjem 1992 – 1999, ko je bil program deležen splošne pohvale zaradi učinkovitosti, prilagodljivosti in zavzetosti.
This is in contrast to the period from 1992-1999 when the programme was generally praised for its effectiveness, adaptability and engagement.
Povezava med dvema komponentama, demokracijo in človekovimi pravicami, je v dokumentu dobro opredeljena, saj beremo, da sta »temeljni svobodi izražanja in združevanja osnovna pogoja za politični pluralizem in demokratični proces, demokratični nadzor in delitev oblasti pa sta bistvenega pomena za ohranjanje neodvisnega sodstva in pravne države, ki sta potrebna za učinkovito varovanje človekovih pravic"
The link between the two components, democracy and human rights, is well defined in the document, stating that "the fundamental freedoms of expression and association are the preconditions for political pluralism and democratic process, whereas democratic control and separation of powers are essential to sustain an independent judiciary and the rule of law which in turn are required for effective protection of human rights."
Da bi lahko odločilno prispeval k demokratičnim spremembam in spoštovanju do človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin v kritičnih situacijah, mora biti instrument bolj strateško usmerjen in osredotočen kot njegov predhodnik, ki je zadnje čase predmet kritike, češ da je skopo delil pomoč in da je skušal sočasno doseči preveč ciljev.
In order to be able to contribute in a decisive way to democratic changes and to the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in critical situations, the instrument needs to be more strategic and focused than its predecessor, latterly criticised for spreading resources too thinly and for trying to meet too many objectives at the same time.
Številne strateške izbire bodo opredeljene v strateškem dokumentu, ki bo izdelan vzporedno s pogajanji o zakonodajnem predlogu, kar bo povečalo pomen programskega dokumenta in vključenost Evropskega parlamenta.
Many of these strategic choices will be made within the strategy document, elaborated in parallel with the negotiations on the legislative proposal, which increases the importance of the programming document, and the involvement of the European Parliament .
Zaradi bolj represivnega okolja je potreba po bolj inovativnih delovnih metodah in večji prožnosti izvajanja še večja.
A more repressive environment stresses the need for more innovative working methods and more flexibility in implementation.
Praktične izkušnje s sedanjim Evropskim instrumentom za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic kažejo, da lahko vlade blokirajo financiranje projektov, čeprav odobritev vlade gostiteljice ni predpogoj za izvajanje ukrepov.
Practical experience under the current EIDHR shows that governments can block funding for projects, even if host government consent is not a prerequisite for carrying out actions.
Zavračanje formalnega priznanja nevladnih organizacij je še en način oviranja njihovih dejavnosti ali sposobnosti prejemanja zunanjih prispevkov.
Refusal of formal recognition of NGOs, has been another way to hamper their activities or capacity to receive external contributions.
Finančna uredba same EU doslej ni omogočala financiranja neregistriranih organizacij.
The EU's own Financial Regulation has not so far allowed for funding to a non registered organisation.
Eden od pomembnih vidikov, ki jih bo treba obravnavati, so široki pogoji za upravičenost, in predlog o vključitvi fizičnih oseb, če je to potrebno, je na tem področju ustrezen.
Wide-ranging conditions for eligibility are thus one of the important aspects that need to be addressed, and the proposal to include natural persons when necessary, is appropriate in this field.
Spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic seveda ni omejeno na ta instrument, ki naj bi dopolnjeval geografski instrument in instrument stabilnosti.
Promotion of democracy and human rights is of course not limited to this instrument, which should be a complement to the geographical instruments and the stability instrument.
Precejšnja sredstva bodo dodeljena v okviru večletnih geografskih in razvojnih programov in v teh programih je zaslediti jasno potrebo po krepitvi demokracije in človekovih pravic.
Significant resources will be allocated within multiannual geographical and development programmes and there is a clear need for reinforcement of democracy and human rights in these programmes.
Narava tega instrumenta pa je vendarle drugačna, saj se osredotoča predvsem na civilno družbo, njegovo področje delovanja je globalno in ne potrebuje odobritve partnerske države.
But this instrument is different in nature, focusing primarily on civil society, by its global scope and without need for agreement with the partner country.
Evropski instrument za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic se dopolnjuje z drugimi instrumenti, kar pa ne pomeni, da se uporablja v primerih, ko drugi instrumenti niso izvedljivi, ampak da je treba izkoristiti njegovo drugačno naravo za doseganje istih ciljev.
Complementarity with the other instruments cannot be limited to applying the EIDHR when others are not possible, but by exploiting its different nature to achieve the same objectives.
Tako projekti, ki jih izvajajo nevladne organizacije, dopolnjujejo in nadaljujejo programe, ki se izvajajo prek geografskih programov in/ali mednarodnih organizacij ali misij za spremljanje volitev.
Projects run by NGOs could, for example, complement and follow-up programmes implemented through geographical programmes and/or by international organisations or election observation missions.
Ta instrument naj bi tudi okrepil druge mehanizme znotraj politik EU, ki zadevajo demokracijo in človekove pravice, vključno s političnimi in finančnimi spodbudami, pogojenostjo pomoči in sankcijami v skladu s klavzulami o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji.
This instrument also needs to reinforce other mechanisms within EU policies touching on democracy and human rights, including political, financial incentives, conditionalities and sanctions under the human rights and democracy clauses.
Natančneje, moral bi biti tudi neposredno orodje za podporo smernicam EU o vprašanjih človekovih pravic
More concretely, it should also be a direct tool for supporting the EU Guidelines on Human rights issues
Smernice za politiko EU glede tretjih držav v zvezi s smrtno kaznijo, junij 1998; Smernice za politiko EU glede tretjih držav v zvezi z mučenjem ali drugim krutim, nečloveškim ali ponižujočim ravnanjem ali kaznovanjem, april 2001; Smernice EU o otrocih in oboroženih sporih, december 2003; Smernice EU o zagovornikih človekovih pravic, junij 2004. .
Guidelines to EU policy towards this countries on the death penalty , June 1998; Guidelines to EU policy towards third countries on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, April 2001; EU Guidelines on children and armed conflict , December 2003; EU Guidelines on human rights defenders , June 2004 .
Proračunske obveznosti so še skromne, toda v okolju, kjer doseženi dogovor o finančnih perspektivah močno omejuje zunanje ukrepe, je treba dejstvo, da je instrument prejel več finančnih sredstev kot njegov predhodnik, sprejeti pozitivno, saj je v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami Evropskega parlamenta.
The budget commitments are still modest, but in an environment in which the agreement on the Financial Perspectives puts external actions under severe constraints, the fact that the instrument is given more financial resources than its predecessor, must be received positively and coincides with the priorities of the European Parliament.
Ključne točke
Key points
Cilji in področja uporabe
Objectives and scope
Ohranjanje civilne družbe kot temeljnega stebra instrumenta je dobrodošel pristop, ki bi ga bilo mogoče še podrobneje obrazložiti.
The maintenance of civil society as a central pillar of the instrument is a welcome approach, but can still be spelled out more precisely.
V ciljih tako ni jasno izraženo, da je neposredno podpiranje neodvisne civilne družbe eden od namenov instrumenta.
In fact, in the objectives it is not clearly stated that the direct support to an independent civil society is one of the aims of the instrument.
Definicija civilne družbe naj bo čim širša.
The definition of civil society should be as wide as possible.
Predlaga se nova struktura tega poglavja, da bi bilo bolj jasno in natančno.
A new structure for this chapter is proposed, in order to make it more clear and precise.
Okrepitev vloge Parlamenta pri načrtovanju programov in nadzoru.
Enhancing the role of the European Parliament, both in programming and in monitoring activities.
Eno od glavnih vprašanj na pogajanjih o drugih finančnih instrumentih za zunanjo pomoč je bila vloga Evropskega parlamenta, zlasti zato, ker gre pri novih uredbah bolj kot v preteklosti za okvirno zakonodajo, zaradi česar so pomembne politične izbire potisnjene v fazo izvajanja.
The role of the Parliament has been one of the main issues during the negotiations on the other financial instruments for external assistance, partly due to the fact that the new regulations are more framework legislation than previously, leaving important policy choices to the implementation stage.
Uredba mora Parlamentu omogočiti, da opravlja svojo vlogo vsaj v obsegu, kot je bilo dogovorjeno v drugih instrumentih.
This regulation must at least take the role of the Parliament to the same point as has been agreed in other instruments.
Drugo vprašanje, ki pa je s tem tesno povezano, je vloga parlamentov pri spodbujanju demokracije in človekovih pravic.
Another issue, though closely linked, is the role of parliaments in promotion of democracy and human rights.
Da bi lahko učinkovito deloval, mora biti instrument prožnejši kot doslej.
In order to be able to work efficiently, the instrument needs to be more flexible than has hitherto been the case.
Treba se je soočiti s pomanjkljivostmi prejšnje pobude, za katere sta bili krivi predvsem prevelika togost in birokracija, zaradi katerih so se zmanjšale možnosti odzivanja na težavne situacije.
The shortcomings of the former initiative, to a great extent due to excessive rigidity and bureaucracy, which has put serious constraints to the possibility to deal with difficult situations, must be addressed.
Upamo, da bodo nedavno predlagane spremembe finančne uredbe, ki dopuščajo večkratno dodeljevanje ter omogočajo prejemanje sredstev tudi neregistriranim organizacijam, odstranile nekatere dvome.
Recent changes proposed for the financial regulation, allowing on-granting as well as the possibility for non-registered organisations to receive funding, will hopefully respond to some of the previous concerns.
Za izredno težavne situacije, kadar prispevki iz tujine lahko ogrozijo lokalne organizacije, je treba razviti druge, bolj posredne metode, ter olajšati tako imenovano "možnost zanikanja".
For extremely difficult situations, where foreign contributions can put local organisations in danger, other more indirect methods of support needs to be developed, facilitating what is called deniability .
V uredbi beremo, da se "pomoč Skupnosti v skladu s to uredbo zagotovi, če in samo v obsegu, v katerem primerne pomoči ni mogoče zagotoviti v okviru teh instrumentov ali če je mogoče v okviru te uredbe pomoč zagotoviti bolj učinkovito".
The regulation states that "Community assistance under this regulation shall be provided if, and to the extent that, adequate assistance cannot alone be provided under these instruments, or if assistance can be provided more effectively under this Regulation".
To formulacijo je možno razumeti, kot da obstaja hierarhija med instrumenti in da so torej instrumenti demokracije in človekovih pravic podrejeni drugim instrumentom, ne pa da jih dopolnjujejo.
This formulation could be understood as if there were a hierarchy between the instruments, as if the Democracy and Human Rights instruments would be subordinated rather than complementing the other instruments.
Zato je treba naprej razvijati pojem komplementarnosti.
The concept of complementarity is therefore to be further developed.
Tako kot drugi instrumenti, vsebuje sedaj predlog klavzulo o pregledu, ki določa, da je treba najkasneje do 31. decembra predložiti oceno prvih treh let izvajanja.
Like the other instruments, the proposal now contains a review clause, stating that an evaluation of the three first years of implementation should be presented by 31 December 2010 at the latest.
Radi bi poudarili pomen pregleda, ki bo izveden v letu 2009, ter zahtevamo, daj se poročilo predstavi čim prej.
We would like to underline the importance of this review to be undertaken during 2009 and urge that the report be presented at the earliest possible date.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi instrumenta financiranja za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic po svetu (Evropski instrument za demokracijo in človekove pravice)
on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a financing instrument for the promotion of democracy and human rights worldwide (European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights)
Uvodna izjava 1, prvi stavek
Recital 1, first sentence
(1) Predlagan je nov okvir za načrtovanje in zagotavljanje pomoči, katerega namen je doseči večjo učinkovitost zunanje pomoči Skupnosti.
(1) A new framework for planning and delivering assistance is proposed in order to make the Community’s external assistance more effective.
(1) Predlagan je nov okvir za načrtovanje in zagotavljanje pomoči, katerega namen je doseči večjo učinkovitost in preglednost zunanje pomoči Skupnosti.
(1) A new framework for planning and delivering assistance is proposed in order to make the Community’s external assistance more effective and transparent .
Za državljane in njihove izvoljene predstavnike je zelo pomembno, da je pri postopkih načrtovanja in izvajanja zunanje pomoči zagotovljena visoka stopnja preglednosti.
It is essential to guarantee citizens and their elected representatives a high standard of transparency in the procedures for the planning and delivery of external assistance.
(4) Evropsko soglasje o razvoju, o katerem so se skupaj dogovorili Svet in predstavniki vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, Evropska komisija in Evropski parlament, poudarja, da je „napredek pri varovanju človekovih pravic, odgovornem vodenju države in demokratizaciji temeljnega pomena za zmanjšanje revščine in trajnostni razvoj“.
(4) The European Consensus on Development jointly agreed by the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Commission and the European Parliament underlines that “progress in the protection of human rights, good governance and democratisation is fundamental for poverty reduction and sustainable development"