natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poleg tega ima Paragvaj pravico, da uvede davke na gorivo, dobavljeno na njegovem ozemlju za uporabo v letalu določenega letalskega prevoznika iz države članice, ki deluje na ozemlju Paragvaja.
Furthermore, Paraguay is entitled to impose taxes on fuel supplied in its territory for use in aircraft of a designated air carrier of a Member State operating within the territory of Paraguay.
Člen 5 (določanje cen): Ta člen odpravlja neskladje med dvostranskimi sporazumi in Uredbo Sveta (EGS) 2409/92 o prevozninah in tarifah za zračni prevoz, ki prevoznikom iz tretjih držav prepoveduje poljubno oblikovanje cen za zračne prevoze, v celoti opravljene v Skupnosti.
Article 5 (pricing): Resolves conflicts between the bilateral agreements and Council Regulation (EEC) 2409/92 on fares and rates for air services, which prohibits third country carriers from being price leaders on air services for carriage wholly within the Community.
V prilogah 1 in 2 so navedeni dvostranski sporazumi in njihovi členi, na katere se sklicujejo členi 1 do 5 predlaganega sporazuma; to so sporazumi med Paragvajem in Belgijo, Italijo, Nemčijo, Nizozemsko, Španijo in Združenim kraljestvom.
Annex 1 and 2 list the bilateral agreements and their articles which are referred to in Article 1 to 5 of the proposed Agreement; these are the agreements between Paraguay and Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom.
V prilogi 3 so naštete druge države, na katere se sklicuje člen 2; in sicer Islandija, Lihtenštajn in Norveška, za katere velja sporazum o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, ter Švica, za katero velja sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o zračnem prometu.
Annex 3 lists the other states referred to in Article 2: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway - which fall under the Agreement on the European Economic Area - and Switzerland falling under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport.
Predlagani Sklep Sveta pooblašča predsednika Sveta, da določi pristojno osebo ali osebe, ki v imenu Skupnosti obvestijo Paragvaj o dokončanju potrebnih notranjih postopkov, da sporazum začne veljati.
The proposed Council Decision empowers the President of the Council to designate the person or persons competent to notify Paraguay that the internal procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement have been completed.
Parlament ima pravico dati mnenje o tem sporazumu po postopku posvetovanja v skladu s sedmim odstavkom člena 83 „Mednarodni sporazumi“, ki se glasi:
Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Agreement under the consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 83 'International agreements', paragraph 7, which reads as follows:
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Paragvaj o nekaterih vidikih zračnega prevoza
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Paraguay on certain aspects of air services
člen 43(1) 20.6.2006
Rule 43(1) 20.6.2006
o predlogu odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o brezpapirnem okolju za carino in trgovino
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a paperless environment for customs and trade
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0609 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0609 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 95 in 135 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog (C6 0420/2005),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 95 and 135 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0420/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6-0407/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0407/2006 ),
Glavni cilj odločbe o spodbujanju elektronskega carinjenja je uporaba interoperabilnih in dostopnih avtomatiziranih carinskih sistemov ter usklajenih postopkov in storitev v okviru veljavnega, kot tudi prihodnjega posodobljenega carinskega zakonika.
The main objective of the Decision promoting electronic customs is the implementation of interoperable and accessible automated customs systems and of coordinated processes and services, both under the current and the future modernized Customs Code.
Zagotoviti hoče potrebno zavezanost drugih mejnih organov poleg carinskih za uresničevanje konceptov „eno okence“ in „vse na enem mestu".
It is intended to create the necessary commitment, with regard to border agencies other than customs, in order to implement the concepts of a 'Single Window' and a 'One-Stop Shop'.
Glavni cilj odločbe je določiti ukrepe, ki jih je treba sprejeti, in roke, ki jih bodo morale spoštovati vse zainteresirane strani, da bi se do začetka veljavnosti posodobljenega carinskega zakonika vzpostavilo preprosto in brezpapirno okolje za carino in trgovino.
The main purpose of the Decision is to determine what action needs to be taken and what deadlines met by all stakeholders for the achievement of a simple and paperless environment for customs and trade by the time the modernized Customs Code enters into force.
Vzpostavitev in upravljanje varnih, interoperabilnih in dostopnih sistemov elektronskega carinjenja bosta izboljšala in olajšala logistiko dobavne verige in carinske postopke.
By setting up and operating secure, interoperable and accessible electronic customs systems the supply chain logistics and customs processes should be improved and facilitated.
Predlog zagotavlja večjo učinkovitost carinjenja, poenostavitev upravnih postopkov za javne (EU ali nacionalne) in zasebne stranke ter olajšanje trgovine.
The proposal provides for greater efficiency of customs clearance, simplification of administrative procedures for public (EU or national) and private parties and facilitation of trade.
Elektronsko okolje za carino in trgovino, ki obsega dostopne in interoperabilne carinske sisteme, bo omogočilo zlasti hitrejšo sprostitev blaga.
Especially, an electronic environment for customs and trade, consisting of accessible and interoperable customs systems, could lead to a faster release of goods.
Poleg tega bodo gospodarski subjekti lahko opravili svoje poslovanje, povezano s carino, s carinsko upravo na ozemlju svojega sedeža (centralizirano carinjenje in enotna dostopna točka).
Besides, economic operators could be able to conduct their customs-related business with the customs administration at the place where they are established (centralised customs clearance and single access point).
Varnost blaga in mednarodne trgovine bo večja, varstvo okolja in potrošnikov pa se bo izboljšalo z bolj usmerjenim carinskim nadzorom na podlagi elektronsko vodenih sistemov obvladovanja tveganja.
Furthermore, the safety of goods and security of international trade should be increased, environmental and consumer protection should be enhanced through better targeted customs controls based on electronic risk management systems.
Države članice so že veliko vložile v razvoj avtomatiziranih carinskih sistemov.
Member States have already invested significantly in the development of automated customs systems.
Kljub temu je zaradi razlik med veljavnimi sistemi, zbirkami pravil in uporabljenimi podatki izničena korist že dosežene uskladitve na tem področju, zlasti zaradi pomanjkanja interoperabilnosti med temi sistemi.
However, the difference between existing systems, sets of rules and data used offsets the advantages of any harmonization achieved in this field so far, primarily because of the lack of interoperability between these systems.
Bistveno je, da carinski sistemi lahko izmenjujejo elektronske podatke in da se jim zagotovi vrsta vmesnikov s trgovino, temelječih na splošno uporabljeni tehnologiji.
It is essential that customs systems are able to exchange electronic information and are provided with a range of interfaces with the trade, based on commonly used technology.
Informacijskih aplikacij za carinjenje na ravni celotne Skupnosti zaenkrat še ni, razen računalniškega tranzitnega sistema NCTS, ki je uspešno dokazal izvedljivost takšnih sistemov in odpira nove možnosti za podobne aplikacije v drugih carinskih režimih.
Community-wide IT applications for customs clearance do not yet exist, apart from the new computerized transit system, NCTS, which has successfully demonstrated the feasibility of such systems and opens new opportunities for similar applications in other customs regimes.
To bi zahtevalo uvedbo usklajenega delovanja in, kadar je to ustrezno, skupne standarde in strukture.
This would require the introduction of a convergence framework and, where appropriate, common standards and structures.
Poročevalec podpira cilje in vsebino predloga.
The rapporteur supports the objectives and the content of the proposal.
Zato predlaga sprejetje predloga Komisije brez sprememb.
Therefore, he proposes to adopt the Commission proposal without amendment.
Predlog Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o brezpapirnem okolju za carino in trgovino
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a paperless environment for customs and trade
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi programa ukrepov Skupnosti na področju potrošniške politike (2007–2013)
on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme of Community action in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013)
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (13241/1/2006 – C6‑0420/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (13241/1/2006 - C6–0420/2006 ),
Sprejeta besedila , 23.3.2006, P6_TA(2006)0107 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0115 )
Texts Adopted , 23.3.2006, P6_TA(2006)0107 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0115 )
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2006)0235 )
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0235 )
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6‑0408/2006 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0408/2006 ),
S programom ukrepov Skupnosti na področju varstva potrošnikov za obdobje od 2007 do 2013 naj bi dopolnjevali, podpirali in spremljali politiko držav članic in prispevali k varovanju zdravja, varnosti, ekonomskih in pravnih interesov potrošnikov, pa tudi spodbujali njihove pravice do obveščenosti, izobraževanja ter samoorganiziranja za zaščito svojih interesov.
The Community action programme in the field of consumer protection for the years 2007 to 2013 aims to complement, support and monitor the policies of the Member States and to contribute to protecting the health, safety, economic and legal interests of consumers; as well as to promoting their rights to information, to education and to organise themselves in order to safeguard their interests.
Z ukrepi naj bi zagotovili enako raven varstva za vse potrošnike v EU in učinkovito uporabo pravil na področju varstva potrošnikov.
The actions shall contribute to ensure an equally high level of protection for all EU consumers and the effective application of consumer protection rules.
Komisija je 6. aprila 2005 sprejela predlog o vzpostavitvi programa ukrepov Skupnosti na področju zdravja in varstva potrošnikov za obdobje 2007 do 2013.
On 6 April 2005 the Commission adopted the Proposal establishing a Programme of Community action in the field of Health and Consumer protection 2007-2013.
Po njenem mnenju bi združitev teh dveh področij vodila k večji usklajenosti politike, ekonomiji obsega, večji preglednosti in racionalnejšim upravnim postopkom.
In the Commission's view bringing the two areas together would lead to greater policy coherence, economies of scale, increased visibility and streamlined administrative procedures.
Vendar se Evropski parlament s tem ni strinjal in je 23. marca 2006 s 56 predlogi sprememb sprejel svoje stališče, v katerem je program razdelil na dva dela.
However, the European Parliament had a different opinion and adopted its position, which split the programme into two parts, on 23 March 2006 with 56 amendments.
Na podlagi sporazuma o finančnem okviru za obdobje 2007–2013 med Komisijo, Svetom in Evropskim parlamentom dne 17. maja 2006 (medinstitucionalni sporazum o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju) se je Komisija strinjala z revidiranim spremenjenim predlogom, v katerem so bila sredstva zmanjšana z 233,46 milijonov EUR, določenih na prvi obravnavi, na 156,8 milijonov EUR.
On the basis of the conclusions on 17 May 2006 by the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament of the agreement on the 2007-2013 financial framework (Inter-Institutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management) the Commission agreed on a revised proposal, with a financial envelop cut from 233,46 million EUR in the first reading to 156,8 million EUR.
Posledično so bili potrošniški cilji natančneje opredeljeni na podlagi dveh na novo oblikovanih ciljev:
As a consequence the consumer objectives have been defined more tightly around two new newly formulated objectives:
Poleg tega je bilo število potrošniških ukrepov preoblikovano in zmanjšano z 20 na 11, najtežja sprememba za potrošniške organizacije pa je bilo črtanje posebnih projektov.
Furthermore, the number of consumer actions has been restructured and reduced from 20 to 11, where the most difficult change for consumer organisations was the deletion of specific projects.
Poročevalec meni, da je bila večina zahtev Parlamenta iz prve obravnave zajetih v novi predlog (npr. posebna pozornost novim državam članicam, izpostavljeni potrošniki in pogoji za pridobitev finančnih sredstev).
Your rapporteur considers that most of the Parliament's requirements from the first reading were incorporated in the new proposal (e.g. special attention to new member states, vulnerable consumers and eligibility criteria for community financing).
Obravnavana so različna pravna sredstva (sodna in izvensodna, individualna in skupna), vendar niso omenjena izrecno, kakor je zahtevala večina v Parlamentu.
The different means of redress (judicial and extra-judicial, individual and collective) are covered but not mentioned explicitly, as demanded by a majority of the EP.
Nenazadnje je Komisija predstavila novo zamisel o finančni podpori za celovit evropski magistrski študij o varstvu potrošnikov.
Finally the Commission launched a brand new idea to financially support the development of European integrated master degree courses in consumer issues.
Julija 2006 so se med Parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo začela neformalna pogajanja.
Informal negotiations between Parliament, the Council and the Commission started in July 2006.
Tri institucije so se dogovorile o sporazumu.
A compromise was agreed between the three Institutions.
Predsednik Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov je 22. septembra 2006 pisal Svetu, naj priporoči, da Parlament odobri to besedilo, ne da bi v drugi obravnavi vložil predloge sprememb.
On 22 September 2006 the chair of Parliament's Committee on Internal Market and Consumer protection wrote to the Council to recommend that Parliament approves this text without tabling amendments in second reading.
Svet je 13. novembra 2006 sprejel skupno stališče na podlagi sporazuma s Parlamentom.
On 13 November 2006 the Council adopted its common position, which follows the compromise negotiated with Parliament.
Vsebina skupnega stališča je enaka sporazumu; pravniki lingvisti so ga nekoliko preoblikovali.
The substance of the common position is identical with the compromise; its form has been slightly changed by the lawyer linguists.
Vsi manjši popravki so sprejemljivi in ne ogrožajo sporazuma med institucijama.
These minor changes are all acceptable and do not call into question the agreement reached between the two Institutions.
Poročevalec priznava, da skupno stališče Sveta pojasnjuje predlog in da so spremembe nujne zaradi bolj omejenih proračunskih sredstev, vendar pa to ni spremenilo ciljev in namena predloga, ki je bil sprejet na prvi obravnavi.
Your rapporteur recognises that the Council common position clarifies the proposal and that the changes are necessary to respond to the more limited budget, but this has not changed the objectives or the spirit of the proposal adopted at first reading.
Nov program je treba začeti z novim proračunom januarja 2007, da se tudi potrošniškim organizacijam omogoči načrtovanje njihovega dela in finančnih sredstev.
The new programme should start in January 2007 with the new budget, to allow also the consumer organisations to plan their work and financial resources.
Poročevalec zato priporoča sprejetje programa brez predlogov sprememb v drugi obravnavi.
Your rapporteur therefore recommends that it be adopted without amendment at second reading.
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi programa ukrepov Skupnosti na področju potrošniške politike (2007–2013)
Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme of Community action in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013)
o predlogu Odločbe Sveta o spremembi Odločbe 90/424/EGS o odhodkih na področju veterine
on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 90/424/EEC on expenditure in the veterinary field
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0273 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0273 )
UL C .../ ,
OJ C .../ Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0199/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0199/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6–0409/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0409/2006 ),
(8a) Premalo je znanega o izidih programov za izkoreninjenje in nadzorovanje nekaterih živalskih bolezni ter za boj proti njim v različnih državah članicah.
(8a) Little is known about what has occurred with programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of certain animal diseases in the various Member States.
(8b) Obstajajo različni odnosi in načini obravnave enakih bolezni v različnih državah članicah, tudi v sosednjih, kar lahko vpliva na učinkovitost sprejetih ukrepov.
(8b) There are different attitudes to and ways of dealing with the same diseases in various Member States, even neighbouring Member States, and this may affect the efficiency of the measures taken.
(8c) Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti izrednim razmeram, ki nenadno in nepredvidljivo zahtevajo zelo veliko finančnih sredstev.
(8c) Particular attention should be paid to emergency situations, which require the sudden and unforeseeable disbursement of very large financial resources.
Člen 16, točka a a (novo) (Odločba 90/424/EGS )
Article 16, point a a (new) (Decision 90/424/EC)
a a) podporo ukrepom za širjenje dobre prakse in spodbujanje predložitve skupnih programov dveh ali več držav članic in mejnih regij, kadar koli je to potrebno za preprečevanje, izkoreninjenje in nadzorovanje nalezljivih živalskih bolezni, vključno z zoonozami, ter boj proti njim.
(aa) Support for actions to disseminate good practices and encourage the submission of joint programmes by two or more Member States and border regions, wherever this is shown to be important for the prevention, control, monitoring and eradication of contagious animal diseases, including zoonoses;
Člen 24, odstavek 1, pododstavek 2 (Odločba 90/424/EGS )
Article 24, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 (Decision 90/424/EC)
Seznam iz Priloge se lahko spremeni v skladu s postopkom iz člena 41, zlasti ob pojavu živalskih bolezni, ki pomenijo tveganje za zdravje živali in posredno za zdravje ljudi.
The list in the Annex may be amended in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 41, in particular with regard to emerging animal diseases which pose a risk for animal health and, indirectly, to public health.
Seznam iz Priloge se lahko posodobi le po predhodnem posebnem mnenju Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
The list in the Annex may be updated only after the European Parliament and the Council have given their opinion on the matter.
Člen 24, odstavek 1, pododstavek 2 a (novo) (Odločba 90/424/EGS)
Article 24, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 a (Decision 90/424/EC)
Vendar imajo države članice možnost predložiti nacionalne programe, vezane na njihove posebne okoliščine, ki jih bo Evropska unija financirala v boju proti nalezljivim živalskim boleznim in zoonozam, za njihovo izkoreninjenje in nadzorovanje.
However, each Member State may, depending on its specific circumstances, submit national programmes, which shall be co-financed by the EU, for the eradication, control and monitoring of contagious animal diseases and zoonoses .
Člen 24, odstavek 2, pododstavek 1 (Odločba 90/424/EGS)
Article 24, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 (Decision 90/424/EC)
Vsako leto države članice najpozneje do 31. marca Komisiji predložijo letne ali večletne programe, katerih začetek je predviden naslednje leto in za katere želijo prejeti finančni prispevek Skupnosti.
Each year, by 31 March at the latest, Member States shall submit to the Commission the annual or multi-annual programmes starting in the following year for which they wish to receive a financial contribution from the Community.
Vsako leto države članice najpozneje do 31. maja Komisiji predložijo letne ali večletne programe, katerih začetek je predviden naslednje leto in za katere želijo prejeti finančni prispevek Skupnosti.
Each year, by 30 April at the latest, Member States shall submit to the Commission the annual or multi-annual programmes starting in the following year for which they wish to receive a financial contribution from the Community.
Člen 24, odstavek 2, pododstavek 2 (Odločba 90/424/EGS)
Article 24, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 (Decision 90/424/EC)
Programi, predloženi po 31. marcu , ne bodo upravičeni do financiranja za naslednje leto.
Programmes submitted after 31 March shall not be eligible for financing the following year
Programi, predloženi po 31. maju , ne bodo upravičeni do financiranja za naslednje leto.
Programmes submitted after 30 April shall not be eligible for financing the following year.
Člen 26, pododstavek 1 a (novo) (Odločba 90/424/EGS)
Article 26, paragraph 1 a (new) (Decision 90/424/EC)
Izredne razmere, ki nenadno in nepredvidljivo zahtevajo zelo velika finančna sredstva, se vedno priznajo in zanje ne veljajo roki iz te odločbe.
Emergency situations requiring the sudden and unforeseeable disbursement of very large financial resources shall always be accepted and shall not be subject to the deadlines referred to in this Decision.
Člen 43 a (Odločba 90/424/EGS)
Article 43 a (new) (Decision 90/424/EC)
7a) Člen 43a se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(7a) Article 43a is replaced by the following:
"Člen 43a
“Article 43a
Komisija vsaka štiri leta predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o veterinarskih razmerah in o razmerju stroški-učinkovitost izvajanja programov v različnih državah članicah, zlasti z obrazložitvijo sprejetih meril."
Every four years, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the animal health situation and the cost-effectiveness of the implementation of programmes in the various Member States, including details of the criteria adopted.”
Odločba Sveta 90/638/EGS se razveljavi od datuma začetka veljave odločbe o določitvi meril iz tretjega pododstavka člena 24(2) Odločbe 90/424/EGS in podrobnih pravil iz člena 24(10) navedene odločbe.
Council Decision 90/638/EEC is repealed from the date of taking effect of the Decision laying down the criteria referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 24(2) of Decision 90/424/EEC and the detailed rules referred to in Article 24(10) of that Decision.