natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če je ugotovljeno, da projekt v evropskem interesu vključuje čezmejni del, ki se tehnično in finančno ne more razdeliti, zadevni državi članici opravita nadnacionalno raziskavo, katere cilj je oceniti ta čezmejni del in se posvetovati z javnostjo pred odobritvijo gradnje.
If a project which is declared to be of European interest includes a cross-border section which is technically and financially indivisible, the two Member States concerned shall conduct a transnational enquiry with a view to evaluating the cross-border section and consulting the public prior to authorisation of the project.
Usklajeni ali nadnacionalni poizvedovalni postopki, določeni v odstavkih 8 in 9, se uporabljajo brez poseganja v obveznosti, ki jih nalaga zakonodaja Skupnosti o varovanju okolja, zlasti o oceni vplivov na okolje.
The coordinated or transnational enquiry procedures referred to in paragraphs 8 and 9 shall apply without prejudice to the obligations imposed by the Community legislation on environmental protection, particularly on environmental impact assessment.
Zadevne države članice obvestijo Komisijo o začetku in rezultatih teh usklajenih postopkov ali nadnacionalnih poizvedovanj.
The Member States concerned shall inform the Commission when such coordinated or transnational enquiry procedures are launched and of the results.
Nesprejemljivo je, če se v potrebnem postopku posvetovanja in odobritve obide lokalne organe in nacionalne vlade, saj je to v neskladju z ratificiranimi obveznostmi EU in njenih držav članic, npr. s Protokolom iz Aarhusa.
Bypassing the necessary process of consultation and authorisation through local bodies and national government is unacceptable, since it goes against ratified commitments of the EU and its Member States such as the Aarhus protocol.
Še bolj nesprejemljivo pa je izbiranje takega hipotetičnega seznama Komisiji brez soodločanja ali posvetovanja regij brez zbirke objektivnih meril.
Furthermore, choosing such a hypothetical list of infrastructure to the Commission, without co-decision nor consultation of regions, is even more unacceptable without a set of objective criteria.
Izvajanje projektov v evropskem interesu
Implementation of Projects of European Interest
Projekti v evropskem interesu bodo hitro izvedeni.
The projects of European Interest shall be rapidly implemented.
Najpozneje šest mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te odločbe države članice predložijo Komisiji časovni razpored za uresničitev teh projektov, ki določa:
No later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Decision, Member States shall submit to the Commission a timetable for the completion of those projects including details of:
a) predvideni čas uresničitve postopka odobritve načrtovanja projekta,
(a) the envisaged passage of the project through the planning approval process,
b) časovni razpored študije izvedljivosti in faze načrtovanja,
(b) the timetable for the feasibility and design phase,
c) obdobje gradnje projekta,
(c)the construction of the project
d) začetek obratovanja projekta.
(d) the entry into service of the project.
Države članice predložijo Komisiji letna poročila o stanju razvoja projektov, omenjenih v odstavku 1.
Member States shall provide annual reports to the Commission on the progress with projects referred to in paragraph 1.
Če projekti napredujejo počasneje, kot je bilo predvideno v časovnem razporedu, predloženem Komisiji, morajo države članice Komisiji predložiti popravljen načrt.
Where progress is slower than in the timetable submitted to the Commission, Member States must submit a revised plan to the Commission.
Države članice sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da je postopek odobritve za projekte skupnega interesa učinkovit in da ne povzroča nepotrebnih zamud.
Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that the authorisation procedure for projects of European Interest is efficient and does not include any unnecessary delays.
Čeprav besedilo navidezno podpira postopek sodelovanja z lokalnimi organi in sklepi, člen 9.3 še zlasti razkriva, da je cilj besedila oslabiti demokratični postopek.
Though the text pays lip service to the due process of concertation with local bodies and decisions, Article 9-3 in particular reveals that the objective of the text is to weaken the democratic process.
Člen 9 bi upravičil, da države članice uvedejo infrastrukturo proti volji javnih ali lokalnih organov, in uporabil „evropski“ izgovor za prepreko demokratičnemu postopku.
Article 9 would justify the imposition of infrastructure by Member States against the will of the public or the local bodies, and would give a “European” excuse to circumvent democratic process.
Evropski usklajevalec
European Coordinator
Usklajevalec ukrepa v imenu in po pooblastilu Komisije.
The Coordinator shall act in the name and on behalf of the Commission.
Evropski usklajevalec je odgovoren samo za en prednostni projekt ali en del prednostnega projekta.
The mission of the Coordinator shall cover a single priority project or a section of a priority project.
Če je potrebno, se njegova naloga lahko razširi na druge povezane prednostne projekte.
If necessary, the mission of the European Coordinator may be extended to other related priority projects.
Evropski usklajevalec je izbran na osnovi njegovega poznavanja evropskih institucij in vprašanj, povezanih s tehničnim, družbeno-gospodarskim in okoljskim ocenjevanjem velikih projektov.
The European Coordinator shall be chosen on the basis of experience of the European institutions and knowledge of issues relating to the technical, financial, socio-economic and environmental evaluation of major projects.
Odločba o imenovanju evropskega usklajevalca določa, na kakšen način usklajevalec izvaja svoje naloge.
The Decision designating the European Coordinator shall specify how the coordinator is to perform his tasks.
Evropski usklajevalec:
The European Coordinator shall:
(a) spodbuja skupne metode ocenjevanja projektov, svetuje zagovornikom projektov glede finančnih stroškov projekta in poda, če je to primerno, svoje mnenje o vprašanjih, povezanih z delovanjem omrežij;
(a) promote joint methods for the evaluation of projects; advise project promoters on the financial package for the projects; and give, if appropriate, an opinion on issues relating to the operation of networks;
b) vsako leto predloži Komisiji poročilo o doseženem napredku v zvezi z izvajanjem projekta ali projektov, za katere je bil imenovan, novih razvojnih ali drugih okoliščin, ki bi lahko vplivale na značilnosti projekta ali projektov, ter vseh težavah ali ovirah, ki bi lahko povzročile znatne zamude;
(b) submit every year a report to the Commission regarding progress achieved in the implementation of the project(s) for which he has been designated, new regulatory or other developments which could affect the characteristics of the project(s) and any difficulties and obstacles which are likely to result in a significant delay;
(c) spodbuja dialog s ponudniki, uporabniki, regionalnimi in lokalnimi oblastmi ter predstavniki civilne družbe, s čimer bi pridobili boljše znanje o potrebah po storitvah prenosa, omejitvah in parametrih storitve za dosego čim boljšega izkoristka zadevne infrastrukture.
(c) contribute to the dialogue with operators, users, regional and local authorities and representatives of civil society with a view to gaining fuller knowledge of demand for transmission services, of the constraints and of the service parameters required to optimise the use of the infrastructure concerned.
Zadevne države članice sodelujejo z evropskim usklajevalcem in mu zagotovijo vse podatke, potrebne za izvajanje njegovih nalog, določenih v odstavku 4.
The Member States concerned shall cooperate with the European Coordinator and give the Coordinator the information required to carry out the tasks referred to in paragraph 4.
Komisija lahko zaprosi za mnenje evropskega usklajevalca pri obravnavi prošenj za finančna sredstva Skupnosti v zvezi s projekti ali skupinami projektov, za katere je bil imenovan ta poročevalec.
The Commission may request the opinion of the European Coordinator when examining applications for Community funding for projects or groups of projects for which he has been designated.
Kot predlaga besedilo, je evropski usklajevalec imenovan za pospeševanje gradnje infrastrukture in da upraviči neupoštevanje demokratičnega postopka.
As proposed in the text, the European coordinator is created to accelerate the construction of infrastructure, and justify the by-passing of democratic processes.
Pooblaščen bi bil kot pospeševalec gradnje in bi oviral postopek vrednotenja stroškov in koristi infrastrukture brez vnaprejšnje presoje rezultatov posvetovanj.
His mandate would be a facilitator of construction, and by itself would impede in the process of evaluating the costs and benefits of an infrastructure without prejudging the results of consultations.
Tako bi bila ena glavnih pobud demokratičnega postopka pristranska.
Thus one main motivation of the democratic process would be biased.
V tem poročilu se pozornost posveti izvajanju prednostnih projektov in napredku, doseženem pri njihovem izvajanju, kot tudi načinom njihovega financiranja, zlasti glede prispevka finančnih sredstev Skupnosti, ki zadevajo čezmejne povezave, omenjene v točkah 1, 2 in 7 Priloge II.
In this report, attention shall be given to the implementation and progress made in the carrying out of priority projects, as well as the modalities of their financing, especially as regards the contribution of Community funding, which concern cross-border connections as mentioned in Annex II, points 1, 2 and 7.
V tem poročilu se pozornost posveti izvajanju prednostnih projektov, njihovem vplivu na uporabo obnovljivih virov energije in napredku, doseženem pri njihovem izvajanju, kot tudi načinom njihovega financiranja, zlasti glede prispevka finančnih sredstev Skupnosti, ki zadevajo čezmejne povezave, omenjene v točkah 1, 2 in 7 Priloge II.
In this report, attention shall be given to the implementation and progress made in the carrying out of priority projects and to their impact on the use of renewable energy sources , as well as the modalities of their financing, especially as regards the contribution of Community funding, which concern cross-border connections as mentioned in Annex II, points 1, 2 and 7.
V poročilu Komisije morajo biti ocenjeni tudi neposredni in posredni vplivi na razvoj obnovljivih virov energije.
The Commission report must also assess the direct and indirect effects on growth in renewable energy sources.
VSEEVROPSKA ENERGETSKA OMREŽJA Projekti v evropskem interesu iz člena 8
TRANS–EUROPEAN ENERGY NETWORKS Projects of European Interest as defined in Article 8
* Postavitev naprav za fleksibilno * reguliranje prenosnih tokov med Italijo in Slovenijo
· Installation of flexible alternative current transmission systems between Italy and Slovenia
* Daljnovod Udine Ovest (IT) – Okroglo (SI)
· Udine Ovest (IT) – Okroglo line (SI)
* Daljnovod Benetke Sever (IT) – Cordignano (IT)
· Venezia Nord (IT) – Cordignano (IT) line
* Daljnovod Valdigem (PT) – Douro Internacional (PT) – Aldeadávila (ES)
· Valdigem (PT) – Douro Internacional (PT) – Aldeadávila (ES) line
* Podmorski kabel Anglija (UK) in Nizozemska
· Submarine cable England (UK) and Netherlands
* Podmorski kabel Irska – Wales (UK)
· Submarine cable Ireland – Wales (UK)
* Povezava Poljska – Litva
· Poland – Lithuania link
* Podmorski kabel Finska – Estonija (Estlink)
· Submarine cable Finland – Estonia (Estlink)
* Podmorski kabel Skagerak 4 (DK) – (NO)
· Submarine cable Skagerak 4 (DK) – (NO)
* Nova povezava Nemčija – Poljska
· New interconnection Germany – Poland
PLINOVODNA OMREŽJA
GAS NETWORKS
* Severni plinovod Transgas
· North Transgas pipeline
* Plinovod Jamal – Evropa
· Yamal – Europe pipeline
* Plinovod Medgas Alžirija – Španija – Francija – celinska Evropa
· Medgas pipeline Algeria-Spain-France-Continental Europe
* Plinovod Alžirija – Tunizija – Italija
· Algeria – Tunisia – Italy pipeline
* Plinovod Libija – Italija
· Libya – Italy pipeline
* Plinovod Turčija – Grčija – Italija
· Turkey – Greece – Italy pipeline
* Plinovod Turčija – Avstrija
· Turkey – Austria pipeline
Črtanje zaradi skladnosti s predlogi sprememb za člene 8, 9 in 10.
Deleted to ensure consistency with the amendments to Articles 8 to 10.
Predlog odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi smernic za vseevropska energetska omrežja in razveljavitvi Odločb št. 96/391/ES in št. 1229/2003/ES
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down guidelines for trans-European energy networks and repealing Decisions No 96/391/EC and No 1229/2003/EC
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT AND TOURISM
Predlagana odločba obravnava naravo in obseg ukrepov Skupnosti za določitev smernic za vseevropska energetska omrežja.
The proposed Decision addresses the nature and scope of Community action to establish guidelines for trans-European energy networks.
Te smernice opredeljujejo projekte skupnega interesa, vključno s tistimi, ki imajo prednost pri vseevropskih omrežjih za električno energijo in plin.
The guidelines identify projects of common interest, including priority projects among trans-European electricity and gas networks.
Odločba prav tako obravnava razširitev in povezavo omrežij z novimi državami članicami in državami, ki mejijo na Evropsko unijo.
The Decision also addresses the extension and connection of networks to the new Member States and to countries bordering the European Union.
Na področju plinovodnih omrežij razlikujemo med zemeljskim plinom in olefini, to sta v glavnem etilen in propilen, ki se uporabljata v kemični industriji in se pridobivata iz nafte.
Within the field of gas networks a distinction is made between natural gas and olefins which are mainly ethylene and propylene used in the chemical industry and are derived from petroleum.
Trenutno se primarni proizvod, olefin, prenaša po Evropi po plinovodih (70 %), prevaža z ladjami (20 %), preostali del pa z baržami ali po železnici, kar je razlog, da vam, glede na to, da je na voljo malo časa, pišem, da vas obvestim o mnenju našega odbora.
At present the primary product, olefins, is transported in Europe by pipeline (70%), ship (20%) and the rest by barge or rail and it is for this reason that, in view of the short time available, I am writing to inform you of my committee's opinion.
Plinovod je najobičajnejši način prevoza olefinov, primarnega proizvoda, od rafinerije do obratov za pretvorbo.
Pipeline is the most common mode of transport of olefins, the primary product, from refinery to conversion plant.
Vendar pa se v Evropi vsak dan od obratov za pretvorbo do tovarn umetnih mas po cestah prevaža 55 kt poliolefinov, derivata.
However, every day in Europe 55kt of polyolefins, a derivative, are moved by road from conversion plants to plastics factories.
To pomeni vsakodnevno 2600 tovornjakov na cestah ali skoraj milijon prevozov s tovornjaki letno.
This represents 2,600 lorries on the road each day or close to a million lorry movements a year.
Razumna razširitev plinovodnega omrežja za prenos oleofina bi skrajšala razdalje med obrati za pretvorbo in tovarnami umetnih mas.
A judicious expansion of the olefin-carrying pipeline grid would shorten distances between conversion plants and plastics factories.
Povečana uporaba plinovoda in zmanjšana uporaba cest bi imela temu ustrezne koristi.
The increased use of pipeline and reduced use of road would have attendant gains.
Za okolje bi to pomenilo manj emisije CO 2 in NOx.
For the environment it would mean lower CO 2 and NOx emissions.
Na gospodarskem področju pa bi izboljšalo stroškovno učinkovitost in uporabo obratov.
In economic terms it would improve cost efficiency and plant use.
Zmanjšalo bi tudi nevarnost nesreč.
It would also reduce accident risk.
Poleg tega bi razširitev plinovoda povezala pet obstoječih omrežij (britansko, francosko, omrežje Antwerpen-Rotterdam-Amsterdam, italijansko in vzhodnoevropsko) v eno omrežje.
Additionally pipeline expansion would integrate the five existing networks (British, French, ARA, Italian and East European) in one network.
Odbor za promet in turizem poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Člen 2, točka 2, točka (d a) (novo)
Article 2, point 2, point (d a) (new)
(da) kakršno koli podaljšanje plinovodov za olefine do uporabnikov, če je to izvedljivo.
(da) any extensions of olefin pipelines to users where these are feasible.
Člen 4, odstavek 3, točka (c)
Article 4, point 3, point (c)
(c) razvoj in povezava plinovodnih omrežij za olefin za zadovoljitev potrošniških potreb industrije v Skupnosti po olefinih.
(c) development and integration of olefin gases networks in order to meet the olefin gases consumption needs of the industries in the Community.
(c) razvoj in povezava plinovodnih omrežij za olefin za zadovoljitev potrošniških potreb industrije v Skupnosti po olefinih in podaljšanje plinovodov za olefine do uporabnikov .
(c) development and integration of olefin gases networks in order to meet the olefin gases consumption needs of the industries in the Community and extending olefin pipelines to users.
Predlog Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi smernic za vseevropska energetska omrežja in razveljavitvi Odločb št. 96/391/ES in št. 1229/2003/ES
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down guidelines for trans-European energy networks and repealing Decisions No 96/391/EC and No 1229/2003/EC
člena 251(2) in 156 ES
Articles 251(2) and 156 ECT
IIvo Belet, Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca
Ivo Belet, Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand,Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca
o odnosih EU-Rusija
on EU-Russia relations
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................15
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................15
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med ES in Rusijo, ki je pričel veljati 1. decembra 1997
– having regard to the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement between the EC and Russia, which entered into force on 1 December 1997
UL L 327, 28.11.1997, str.
OJ L 327, 28.11.1997, p.
– ob upoštevanju cilja, ki sta ga EU in Rusija zapisali v skupni izjavi 31. maja 2003 ob koncu vrha v Sankt Petersburgu, o skupnem gospodarskem prostoru, skupnem območju svobode, varnosti in pravice, sodelovanju na področju zunanje varnosti ter območju raziskav in izobraževanja, vključno s kulturnimi vidiki,
– having regard to the objective of the EU and Russia, set out in the joint statement issued after the St Petersburg Summit on 31 May 2003, to set up a common economic space, a common space of freedom, security and justice, a space of co-operation in the field of external security and a space of research and education, including cultural aspects,
– ob upoštevanju številnih verodostojnih poročil ruskih in mednarodnih nevladnih organizacij o stalnih hudih kršitvah človekovih pravic v Čečeniji, sodb Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v zvezi s šestimi primeri, povezanimi s Čečenijo, z dne 24. februarja 2005 ter številnih podobnih primerov, ki so še v obravnavi pred tem sodiščem,
– having regard to the many credible reports by Russian and international NGOs on the continuing grave violations of human rights in Chechnya, the judgments of 24 February 2005 of the European Court of Human Rights in six cases relating to Chechnya and the many such cases pending before that court,
– ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila Svetu z dne 26. februarja 2004 o odnosih EU-Rusija
– having regard to its recommendation of 26 February 2004 to the Council on EU-Russia relations
UL C 98E, 23.04.2004, str.
OJ C 98E, 23.4.2004, p.
182. ter resolucije z dne 15. decembra 2004 o vrhu EU-Rusija, ki je potekal 25. novembra 2004 v Haagu
182. , and its resolution of 15 December 2004 on the EU-Russia Summit held in The Hague on 25 November 2004
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2005 o Belorusiji
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2005 on Belarus
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6‑0135/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0135/2005 ),
A. ker so dobri sosedski odnosi in sodelovanje med EU in Rusijo ključnega pomena za stabilnost, varnost in blaginjo cele evropske celine; ker morajo ti odnosi temeljiti na skupnih vrednotah, ki vključujejo človekove pravice, tržno gospodarstvo, pravno državo in demokracijo,
A. whereas good-neighbourly relations and cooperation between the EU and Russia are crucial for stability, security and prosperity across the whole of the European continent; whereas these relations must be based on common values, thus embracing human rights, the market economy, the rule of law and democracy,
B. ker imata EU in Rusija velike ambicije glede njunega partnerstva; ker so potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja na ravni EU za izboljšanje odnosov z Rusijo, ob pozdravljanju napredka v zvezi z vprašanji, kot so ruska ratifikacija Kjotskega protokola in širitev Sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, prehod oseb do Kaliningrada ter napredek pri pogajanjih o ruskem vstopu v STO,
B. whereas the EU and Russia have high ambitions for their partnership; whereas further efforts are needed to enhance relations with Russia at EU level, welcoming the progress made relating to issues such as the Russian ratification of the Kyoto Protocol and the extension of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, and the Kaliningrad transit for persons and progress in negotiating the terms of Russian accession to the WTO,
C. ker Rusija poudarja pomen večstranskih odnosov in na svoje polno sodelovanje v OZN, OVSE, G-8 in Svetu Evrope gleda kot na temeljni kamen svoje zunanje politike,
C. whereas Russia emphasises the importance of multilateralism, and sees its full participation in the UN, OSCE, G-8 and the Council of Europe as a cornerstone of its foreign policy,
D. ker je demokracija v Rusiji oslabljena, zlasti ker so vse večje televizijske postaje in večina radijskih postaj pod nadzorom vlade, širi se samocenzura tiskanih medijev, veljajo nove omejitve glede pravice organiziranja javnih demonstracij, NVO delujejo v vse težjih okoliščinah, povečan je politični nadzor nad sodstvom in uvedene so spremembe načina izvolitve članov državne dume, vse to z namenom krepitve oblasti Kremlja,
D. whereas democracy has been weakened in Russia, in particular by the bringing of all major TV stations and most radio stations under government control, the spread of self-censorship among the print media, new restrictions on the right to organise public demonstrations, a worsening climate for NGOs, increased political control of the judiciary and changes to the way Members of the State Duma are elected, all of which are intended to strengthen the power of the Kremlin,