natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za podporo izvajanju Komisija zagotovi usklajenost in celovitost sistemov za alarmiranje, zgodnje opozarjanje in hitro odzivnost.
To support implementation, the Commission shall ensure that the alert, early warning and rapid response networks and systems for major emergencies are coordinated and integrated.
Komisija in države članice v okviru svojih pristojnosti ukrepajo tako, da zagotovijo učinkovito delovanje instrumenta in na ravni Skupnosti ter držav članic razvijejo mehanizme za dosego ciljev instrumenta.
The Commission and Member States shall take action, within their respective spheres of competence, to ensure that the Instrument operates effectively and to develop mechanisms at Community and Member State level to achieve the objectives of the Instrument.
Zagotoviti morajo potrebne informacije glede ukrepanja v okviru instrumenta in čim večjo udeležbo pri ukrepih, ki jih izvajajo lokalne in regionalne oblasti ter nevladne organizacije.
They shall ensure that the necessary information is provided concerning the actions supported by the Instrument and the broadest possible participation in actions implemented by local and regional authorities and non-governmental organisations.
Če se roki ne upoštevajo ali če napredovanje pri izvajanju ukrepa upravičuje le del dodeljene finančne pomoči, Komisija zahteva od upravičenca, da v določenem roku predloži svoje pripombe.
If the time limits have not been observed or if only part of the allocated financial assistance is justified by the progress made with implementing an action, the Commission shall request the beneficiary to submit observations within a specified period.
Če upravičenec ne predloži zadovoljivega odgovora, lahko Komisija ukine preostalo finančno pomoč in zahteva vračilo že plačanih zneskov.
If the beneficiary does not give a satisfactory answer, the Commission may cancel the remaining financial assistance and demand repayment of sums already paid.
Če upravičenec ne predloži zadovoljivega odgovora, lahko Komisija zahteva pojasnilo ali nadaljnjo razlago .
If the beneficiary does not give a satisfactory answer, the Commission may request clarification or further explanations.
Če odgovor še vedno ni zadovoljiv, Komisija ukine preostalo finančno pomoč in zahteva vračilo že plačanih zneskov.
If the answer remains unsatisfactory, the Commission shall cancel the remaining financial assistance and demand repayment of sums already paid.
Če odgovor upravičenca tudi po predhodni zahtevi za pojasnilo ni zadovoljiv, je potrebno, da Komisija obvezno ukine plačevanje in zahteva vračilo že plačanih zneskov.
If the beneficiary's response remains unsatisfactory after the previous request for clarification, it is necessary that the Commission obligatorily cancels the payment and demands repayment of the sums already paid.
Komisiji pomaga odbor, ki je sestavljen iz predstavnikov držav članic in mu predseduje predstavnik Komisije, v nadaljevanju „odbor“.
The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission, hereinafter “the Committee”.
Komisiji pomaga odbor, ki je sestavljen iz predstavnikov držav članic , vključno s sodelovanjem lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti, in mu predseduje predstavnik Komisije, v nadaljevanju „odbor“.
The Commission shall be assisted by a committee composed of representatives of the Member States , including representatives of local and regional authorities, and chaired by the representative of the Commission, hereinafter “the Committee”.
Regionalne in lokalne oblasti morajo imeti ključno vlogo pri preprečevanju in obvladovanju nesreč.
Regional and local authorities should play a central role in disaster prevention and management .
člen 14, odstavek 2, točka (a)
Article 14, paragraph 2, point (a)
(a) najkasneje do 31. decembra 2010 vmesno poročilo o vrednotenju doseženih rezultatov ter kvalitativne in kvantitativne vidike izvajanja te uredbe;
(a) no later than 31 December 2010, an interim evaluation report on the results obtained and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation of this Regulation;
(a) najkasneje do 31. decembra 2010 vmesno poročilo o vrednotenju doseženih rezultatov ter kvalitativne in kvantitativne vidike izvajanja te uredbe.
(a) no later than 31 December 2010, an interim evaluation report on the results obtained and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation of this Regulation.
To poročilo bo vsebovalo zlasti informacije o oddanih vlogah, sprejetih odločitvah glede odobritve in o porabi odobrene finančne pomoči;
This report shall, in particular, contain information relating to applications submitted, grant decisions taken and the winding-up of financial assistance granted;
Potreben je reden pregled dejanskega izvajanja na podlagi poročila Komisije, dopolnjenega z vsemi razpoložljivimi informacijami.
A regular review of the actual implementation on the basis of a Commission report updated in the light of all the information available is needed.
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti izboljšanju sistemov za nadzor finančnih obveznosti in pregledom, da se zagotovi učinkovita uporaba dodeljenih sredstev.
Particular attention will be paid to improving systems for monitoring financial commitments and to controls to ensure the effective use of the funds committed.
Člen 14, odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 14, paragraph 2 a (new)
Komisija si prizadeva za hitro sprejetje nadaljnjih korakov glede prve, v prvi vrsti finančne pobude, in sicer tako, da bo Evropskemu parlamentu kar najhitreje posredovala svoje predloge sprememb k sklepu Sveta o mehanizmih civilne zaščite v nujnih primerih .
The Commission shall undertake to follow up swiftly this initial, principally financial initiative by submitting its proposed amendments to Decision 2001/792/EC as soon as possible to the European Parliament .
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PREDLAGANI PRAVNI PODLAGI
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS
Zadeva: Pravna podlaga o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za hitro ukrepanje in pripravljenost na velike nesreče ( KOM(2005)0113 – C6‑0181/2005 – 2005/0052(CNS) )
Subject: Legal basis of the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Rapid Response and Preparedness Instrument for major emergencies ( COM(2005)0113 – C6‑0181/2005 – 2005/0052(CNS) )
Še neobjavljeno v UL.
Not yet published in the OJ.
Spoštovani gospod Florenz,
Dear Mr Florenz,
v pismu z dne 18. julija 2005 ste v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosili za mnenje o pravilnosti in primernosti pravne podlage zgoraj omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 18 July 2005 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2) to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Pravno predlog temelji na členu 308 Pogodbe ES in členu 203 Pogodbe ESAE, vi pa menite, da je njegov osrednji namen varovanje zdravja ljudi in okolja, zato bi morala biti pravna podlaga zanj člen 175(1) Pogodbe ES.
Whereas the proposal has Article 308 of the EC Treaty and Article 203 of the EAEC Treaty as its legal basis, you suggest that its preponderant purpose is protection of people's health and the environment and that its legal basis should therefore be Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty.
Zgoraj omenjeno vprašanje je odbor obravnaval na seji dne 15. septembra 2005.
The Committee considered this question at its meeting on 15 September 2005.
Predlog uredbe predvideva vzpostavitev „instrumenta za hitro ukrepanje in pripravljenost na velike nesreče“.
The proposal for a regulation sets out to establish "a Rapid Response and Preparedness Instrument for major emergencies".
Odbor ugotavlja, da se na člen 3(1)(u) Pogodbe ES sklicuje zato, ker naj bi dejavnosti Skupnosti obsegale ukrepe na področju civilne zaščite , ta dejavnost oziroma politika pa je ločena od „politike na področju okolja“ , omenjene v členu 3(1)(l).
The Committee noted that it cites Article 3(1)(u) of the EC Treaty in so far as the activities of the Community are to include measures in the sphere of civil protection , which is a separate activity or policy area from " policy in the sphere of the environment " referred to in Article 3(1)(l).
Odbor je upošteval tudi dejstvo, da je treba po členu 6 Pogodbe ES zahteve glede varstva okolja vključevati v opredelitve in izvajanje politik in dejavnosti Skupnosti, omenjenih v členu 3, in da ne v Pogodbi ES ne v Pogodbi ESAE ne obstaja ad hoc pravna podlaga za civilno zaščito.
The Committee also had regard to the fact that under Article 6 of the EC Treaty environmental protection requirements must be integrated into the definition and implementation of the Community policies and activities referred to in Article 3 and that there is no ad hoc legal basis for civil protection in either the EC Treaty or the EAEC Treaty.
Glede na vse navedeno in v skladu z uveljavljenimi preskusi Sodišča je bilo treba najprej ugotoviti, ali je prevladujoči element predloga civilna zaščita, za kar sta edina možna dopolnilna pravna podlaga člen 308 Pogodbe ES in člen 203 Pogodbe ESAE, ali pa morda varovanje zdravja ljudi in okolja, za kar je ustrezna pravna podlaga člen 175(1) Pogodbe ES.
Consequently, it was necessary to consider, in the light of the traditional tests employed by the Court of Justice, whether the centre of gravity of the proposal is civil protection, in which case the suppletive legal bases of Article 308 of the EC Treaty and Article 203 of the EAEC Treaty are the only possible option, or whether instead it is protection of people's health and the environment, in which case Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty would be the proper legal basis.
V tej povezavi je pomembno še opozoriti, da je mogoče člen 308 Pogodbe ES in člen 203 Pogodbe ESAE uporabiti kot pravno podlago samo v primeru, če Pogodbe ustreznih pooblastil ne predvidevajo drugje.
In this connection, it is important to note that Article 308 of the EC Treaty and Article 203 of the EAEC Treaty can be used as a legal basis only if the Treaties have not provided the necessary powers elsewhere
Primer 45/86 Komisija v.
Case 45/86 Commission v. Council [1987] ECR1493, para.
Stališče Sodišča je, da izbira pravne podlage ne sme biti subjektivna, pač pa „mora temeljiti na objektivnih dejavnikih, ki jih je mogoče sodno preskusiti“,
According to the Court of Justice the choice of legal basis is not a subjective one, but "must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review"
Primer 45/86, Komisija v.
Case 45/86, Commission v. Council [1987] ECR 1439, para.
Svet [1987] ECR 1439, odstavek 5. kot sta denimo namen in vsebina zadevnega ukrepa.
5. , such as the aim and content of the measure in question
Primer C-300/89, Komisija v.
Case C-300/89, Commission v. Council [1991] ECR I-287, para.
Še več, odločilni dejavnik mora biti glavni cilj ukrepa.
Furthermore, the decisive factor should be the main object of a measure
Primer C-377/98, Nizozemska v.
Case C-377/98, Netherlands v. European Parliament and Council [2001] ECR I-7079, para.
Evropski parlament in Svet , [2001] ECR I-7079, odstavek 27, sklicujoč se na Primer C-155/91, Komisija v.
27, quoting Case C-155/91, Commission v. Council [1993] ECR I-939, paras 19-21. .
Svet [1993] ECR I-939, odstavki 19–21.
Careful analysis of the recitals and enacting terms of the proposal for a regulation shows that its centre of gravity is in fact civil protection.
Podrobna analiza uvodnih izjav in normativnega dela predloga uredbe je pokazala, da je prevladujoči element predloga dejansko civilna zaščita, res pa je tudi, da imajo lahko ukrepi civilne zaščite posledice za varovanje okolja in javnega zdravja.
Patently, civil protection measures do have implications for protection of the environment and public health.
Vseeno v besedilu ni mogoče najti utemeljitve za to, da sta pravna podlaga predloga uredbe tako člen 308 Pogodbe ES kot člen 203 Pogodbe ESAE.
However, there seems no justification in the text for basing the proposed regulation on both Article 308 of the EC Treaty and Article 203 of the EAEC Treaty.
Ustrezna pravna podlaga predloga Uredbe Sveta je namreč člen 308 Pogodbe ES.
Accordingly, the proper legal basis for the proposal for a Council Regulation is Article 308 of the EC Treaty.
Pri glasovanju so bili navzoči: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Rainer Wieland (podpredsednik), Antonio López-Istúriz White (pripravljavec mnenja), Maria Berger, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine (namesto Syeda Kamalla), Janelly Fourtou (namesto Diane Wallis), Monica Frassoni, Adeline Hazan (namesto Katalin Lévai), Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Eva Lichtenberger (namesto Alaina Lipietza), Toine Manders (namesto Viktórie Mohácsi), Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Alexander Radwan (namesto Piie-Noore Kauppi), Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Andrzej Tomasz Zapałowski, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka. sklenil, da vam priporoči izbris sklica na člen 203 Pogodbe ESAE, tako da bo pravna podlaga izključno člen 308 Pogodbe ES.
The following were present for the vote: Giuseppe Gargani (Chairman), Rainer Wieland (Vice-Chairman), Antonio López-Istúriz White (Draftsman), Maria Berger, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine (for Syed Kamall), Janelly Fourtou (for Diana Wallis), Monica Frassoni, Adeline Hazan (for Katalin Lévai), Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Eva Lichtenberger (for Alain Lipietz), Toine Manders (for Viktória Mohácsi), Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Alexander Radwan (for Piia-Noora Kauppi), Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Andrzej Tomasz Zapałowski, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka. , to recommend that the reference to Article 203 of the EAEC Treaty be removed, leaving Article 308 of the EC Treaty as the sole legal basis.
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za hitro ukrepanje in pripravljenost na velike nesreče
on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Rapid Response and Preparedness Instrument for major emergencies
Odbor za proračun poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Sredstva za obveznosti iz tega instrumenta se določijo okvirno, v skladu s pogoji odstavka 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka, na 173 milijonov EUR za obdobje sedmih let, od 1. januarja 2007 dalje.
The resources for a commitment from the Instrument shall be fixed on an indicative basis, under the terms of paragraph 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure 1 , at EUR 173 million, for a period of 7 years beginning on 1 January 2007.
Po sprejemu odločitve bo Komisija predstavila zakonodajni predlog, v katerem bo referenčni znesek določila v skladu z ustrezno zgornjo mejo finančnega okvira (glejte predlog spremembe zakonodajne resolucije).
Once a decision is reached, the Commission shall present, if necessary, a legislative proposal to set the reference amount with respect to the appropriate ceiling of the financial perspective (see amendment to the legislative resolution).
Referenčni znesek se vnese pod pogoji iz člena 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma (ne postopek soodločanja).
The reference amount is entered under the conditions spelled out in the article 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement (non co-decision).
Ko je letni delovni program sprejet, se ga posreduje v vednost proračunskemu organu.
Once adopted the annual work programme will be transmitted to the Budgetary Authority for information.
Letni podatki pomagajo proračunskemu organu, da sprejme ustrezno odložitev in oceni učinkovitost instrumenta.
Annual information will help the Budgetary Authority to take the appropriate decision and to evaluate the efficiency of the Instrument.
Na pobudo Komisije lahko instrument pokriva tudi izdatke, ki izhajajo iz spremljanja, nadzora, revizije in vrednotenja, ki so neposredno potrebni za izvajanje te uredbe.
At the initiative of the Commission, the Instrument may also cover expenditure related to monitoring, control, audit and evaluation directly necessary for the implementation of this Regulation.
Izdatki in prvega in drugega pododstavka ne smejo presegati 4 % proračuna.
The expenditure referred to in the first and second subparagraphs may not exceed 4% of the budget.
Proračun glede ukrepov iz odstavka 1 Komisija izvaja centralizirano in neposredno s svojimi oddelki v skladu s členom 53(2) finančne uredbe.
The budget relating to the actions referred to in paragraph 1 shall be implemented by the Commission on a centralised basis and directly by its departments in accordance with Article 53(2) of the Financial Regulation.
Upravljanje instrumenta mora izvajati osebje Komisije s sredstvi, razpoložljivimi za upravljanje.
The administration of the instrument must be carried out by Commission staff through the available funds for administration.
Financiranje upravljanja z operativnimi programi je v nasprotju s proračunskim načelom specifikacije in zmanjšuje preglednost ter ni v skladu s finančno uredbo.
The funding of administration through operational programs conflicts with the budgetary principle of specification, can lead to lack of transparency, and sidesteps the financial regulation.
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za hitro ukrepanje in pripravljenost na velike nesreče
Proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Rapid Response and Preparedness Instrument for major emergencies
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Predlog za UREDBO SVETA o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za hitro ukrepanje in pripravljenost na velike nesreče
Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION establishing a Rapid Response and Preparedness Instrument for major emergencies
Predlog za UREDBO EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za preprečevanje , hitro ukrepanje in pripravljenost na velike nesreče
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a Prevention, Rapid Response and Preparedness Instrument for major emergencies
(Beseda 'preprečevanje' se vstavi skozi celotno besedilo na mestih, kjer je omenjeno 'hitro ukrepanje in pripravljenost na velike nesreče'.)
(The addition of the word ‘prevention’ applies throughout the text wherever preparedness and rapid response are mentioned.)
Glavni namen uredbe je zaščita zdravja ljudi in okolja, kot je jasno izraženo v prvem členu (Predmet).
The preponderant purpose of the Regulation is the protection of people’s health and the environment as expressed clearly in its first article (subject-matter).
Osnovni namen vseh ukrepov, ki so v okviru predloga upravičeni do financiranja, je zaščita človekovega zdravja in okolja.
All the actions eligible for financing under the proposal serve the ultimate purpose of protecting human health and the environment.
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti člena 203 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 203 thereof,
Jedrske nesreče je treba obravnavati v posebnem zakonodajnem instrumentu.
Nuclear accidents should be dealt with in a separate legislative instrument.
(2a) Odmaknjene in najbolj oddaljene regije Skupnosti imajo posebne značilnosti in potrebe zaradi svoje geografije, lege kot tudi družbenih in gospodarskih okoliščin.
(2a) The isolated and outermost regions of the Community have special characteristics and needs owing to their geography, terrain and social and economic circumstances.
Te neugodne okoliščine otežujejo zlasti pravočasno zagotavljanje pomoči in intervencijskih sredstev ter odziv na posebne potrebe v primeru velikih nesreč.
These adverse circumstances make it particularly difficult to deliver timely assistance and intervention resources, and to address particular needs in the event of major emergencies.
Najbolj oddaljene ali odmaknjene regije zahtevajo več pozornosti v različnih mehanizmih in instrumentih Skupnosti.
Outermost or isolated regions require more attention under the various Community mechanisms and instruments.
(4a) Za pospeševanje in zagotovitev boljšega preprečevanja, pripravljenosti in hitrega ukrepanja ob velikih nesrečah je treba izvesti obsežne informacijske kampanje, namenjene širši javnosti in zlasti mladim, kot tudi začeti z izobraževanjem in dvigovanjem ozaveščenosti, ki bi imeli za cilj dviganje stopnje samozaščite in previdnostnih ukrepov v primeru nesreč.
(4a) In order to facilitate and to ensure better prevention of, preparedness for and response to major emergencies, there is a need to conduct extensive information campaigns, as well as to embark on education and awareness-raising initiatives aimed at the public at large and in particular at young people, with the objective of increasing the degree of self-protection and the precautionary measures to be taken in the event of disasters.
V programe izobraževanja in kampanje ozaveščenosti je treba vključiti ukrepe civilne zaščite, da bi dvignili ozaveščenost o potrebi po preprečevanju, pripravljenosti in hitrem ukrepanju pri velikih nesrečah ter zagotovili sodelovanje civilne družbe pri ukrepih preprečevanja in odzivanja.
Civil protection measures must be integrated in teaching schedules and awareness campaigns to raise conscience about the necessity of prevention, preparedness and response to major accidents and to ensure the participation of civil society in preventive and response action .
(6a) Izražanje solidarnosti s tretjimi državami v primeru nesreč in izrednih razmer obstaja že več let kot del zunanjepolitičnih dejavnosti Skupnosti in v skladu z načelom solidarnosti.
(6a) The expression of solidarity with third countries in the face of disasters and emergency situations has existed for many years as part of the Community’s external actions and in accordance with the principle of solidarity.
Civilna zaščita Skupnosti, razširjena zunaj Skupnosti, bi poleg opozarjanja na humanitarno in solidarnostno odgovornost Skupnosti omogočila dodano vrednost in izboljšala učinkovitost in uspešnost delovanja instrumenta.
Community civil protection extended outside the Community would, in addition to addressing the Community’s humanitarian and solidarity responsibilities, provide added value and increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the operation of the Instrument.
V primerih velikih nesreč v tretjih državah bi morala EU pokazati konkretno solidarnost zlasti pri državah v razvoju, kjer imajo številne in obsežne naravne nesreče ter njihov naraščajoč vpliv v zadnjih letih za posledico veliko mrtvih in dolgoročne negativne socialne, gospodarske in okoljske učinke.
The EU should show its concrete solidarity, in the event of major emergencies with third countries, in particular with developing countries where the number and scale of natural disasters and their increasing impact within recent years, have resulted in massive loss of life and long-term negative social, economic and environmental consequences.