natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zaradi političnega pomena opredelitve varnih izvornih držav, še posebej glede posledic ocene spoštovanja človekovih pravic v izvorni državi in njenega vpliva na politiko Evropske unije na področju zunanjih zadev, Svet vsako odločitev o oblikovanju in spremembi seznama sprejme v skladu s členom 251 Pogodbe .
In the light of the political importance of the designation of safe countries of origin, in particular in view of the implications of an assessment of the human rights situation in a country of origin and its implications for the policies of the European Union in the field of external relations, the Council should take any decisions on the establishment or amendment of the list pursuant to Article 251 of the Treaty.
V skladu s členom 251 Pogodbe Parlament na področju azila nima nobenih pooblastil.
In accordance with Article 251 of the EC Treaty, the Parliament shall have co-decision powers in the area of asylum.
Pripravljavka mnenja meni, da bi moral biti skupni seznam usklajen in splošno veljaven za vse države članice.
Your draftswoman believes the common list should be harmonised and apply in general to all Member States.
Meni, da lahko članice sprejmejo strožje postopke, vendar mora biti skupni seznam maksimalni in ne minimalni standard.
She believes that while Members may draw up more stringent procedures, the common list should be the maximum and not the minimum standard.
Obe državi sta bili v letnih poročilih o državah Komisije deležni kritik v zvezi z njunim položajem človekovih pravic.
Both countries have been the subject of criticism in the Commission's annual Country Reports, concerning their human rights situations.
Civilne organizacije imajo tudi dobro dokumentirane primere kršitev človekovih pravic v obeh državah.
Additionally, civil society organisations have well-documented cases of human rights abuses within both states.
(22) Države članice vsebinsko preverijo vse prošnje, tj. ocenijo, če zadevni prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje za priznanje statusa begunca v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2004/83/ES o minimalnih standardih za izpolnjevanje pogojev in status begunca državljanom tretjih držav ali osebam brez državljanstva ali osebam, ki sicer potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito in vsebino zagotovljene zaščite , razen ko ta direktiva predvideva drugačno obravnavo, še zlasti kadar so prepričane , da bo zadevo preučila ali zadostno zaščito zagotovila druga država , ki velja za varno .
(22) Member States should examine all applications on the substance, i.e. assess whether the applicant in question qualifies as a refugee in accordance with Council Directive 2004/83/EC on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, except where this Directive provides otherwise, in particular where they are satisfied that another country which is regarded as safe would do the examination or provide sufficient protection.
Države članice se morajo, preden sprejmejo odločitev, da prošnje za azil v zadevi ne obravnavajo, prepričati, da bo prošnjo preučila ali zadostno zaščito zagotovila druga država, ki velja za varno.
Member States should satisfy themselves that another country which is regarded as safe will examine the asylum application or will provide sufficient protection before taking a decision not to examine an application on the substance.
Besedilo Sveta pušča preveč prostora za negotovost.
The wording proposed by the Council leaves too much room for uncertainty.
(23) Prav tako ne more biti obveznost držav članic vsebinsko preučiti prošnjo za azil, če lahko upravičeno predvidevajo , da bo prosilec zaradi povezave s tretjo državo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo iskal zaščito v tej tretji državi.
(23) Member States should also not be obliged to assess the substance of an asylum application where the applicant, due to a connection to a third country as defined by national law, can reasonably be expected to seek protection in that third country.
(23) Prav tako ne more biti obveznost držav članic vsebinsko preučiti prošnjo za azil, če so prepričane , da prosilec zaradi povezave s tretjo državo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo išče zaščito v tej tretji državi.
(23) Member States should also not be obliged to assess the substance of an asylum application where they are satisfied that the applicant, due to a connection to a third country as defined by national law, is seeking protection in that third country.
(24) Razen tega je treba državam članicam dovoliti, da ne preučijo ali ne preučijo v celoti prošnje za azil tistih prosilcev, ki pridejo na njihovo ozemlje iz evropskih tretjih držav , če te v posebno veliki meri spoštujejo človekove pravice in standarde za zaščito beguncev .
(24) Furthermore, with respect to certain European third countries, which observe particularly high human rights and refugee protection standards, Member States should be allowed to carry out no or no full examination of asylum applications regarding applicants who enter their territory from such European third countries.
Svet o tem odloči po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
The Council should take decisions in this matter after consultation of the European Parliament.
(24)Razen tega v zvezi z evropskimi tretjimi državami, ki v posebno veliki meri spoštujejo človekove pravice in standarde za zaščito beguncev, zaradi posledic, ki bi jih za prosilca lahko imela omejena ali neizvedena obravnava, mora biti uporaba pojma varna tretja država omejena na primere tretjih držav, za katere je Svet prepričan, da izpolnjujejo visoke varnostne standarde, kot jih opredeljuje ta direktiva.
(24) Furthermore, with respect to certain European third countries, which observe particularly high human rights and refugee protection standards, given the potential consequences for the applicant of a restricted or omitted examination, this application of the safe third country concept should be restricted to cases involving third countries with respect to which the Council has satisfied itself that the high standards for the safety of the third country concerned, as set out in this Directive, are fulfilled.
Svet se o tem odloči v skladu s členom 251 Pogodbe .
The Council should take decisions in this matter pursuant to Article 251 of the Treaty.
V skladu z načelom nevračanja morajo imeti prosilci „smiselno povezavo“ s katero koli tretjo državo, prek družine ali širše skupnosti, in ne, kot se to lahko zgodi, zato, ker so potovali čez državo.
In accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, applicants should have a "meaningful link" with any third country, via family or a broader community, and not as may be the case, simply having transited through the state.
V skladu s sporazumi iz Tampereja in izvajanjem Haaškega programa je predvidena uvedba soodločanja za Evropski parlament na področju politike azila in migracij.
Following the agreements of Tampere and the implementation of the Hague programme, the introduction of codecision is foreseen for the European Parliament in the field of asylum and migration policies.
24(a) V zvezi z evropskimi tretjimi državami je treba upoštevati, da so skrbi zaradi varstva človekovih pravic in beguncev, zlasti kar zadeva Rome in druge etnične manjšine, dobro dokumentirane, prav tako primeri prosilcev, ki so morali zbežati iz evropske tretje države po prvotni zaprositvi za azil, ker so bile zlorabljene njegove človekove pravice zaradi negativnih sprememb notranje stabilnosti v tej državi.
(24a) With respect to European third countries, it must be taken into account that concerns regarding human rights and refugee protection, in particular with regard to the Roma and other ethnic minorities, are well documented, as are instances of claimants having to flee a European third country after initially claiming asylum in it, due to human rights abuses against the claimant resulting from negative changes to the state's internal stability.
Osebam, ki zaprosijo za azil potem, ko so potovali čez to državo ali po prvi zaprositvi za azil v taki državi, se ne sme zavrniti pravica, da se njihovo vlogo obravnava v državi članici v skladu z mednarodnim pravom.
Persons claiming asylum after travelling through such states or after initially claiming asylum in such states cannot be denied the right to have their asylum applications processed within Member States in accordance with international law.
Direktiva Sveta 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih standardih za priznanje statusa begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugačnih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, državljanom tretjih držav ali osebam brez državljanstva ter o vsebini take zaščite (UL L 304/12, 30.9.2004) .
Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on Minimum Standards for the Qualification and Status of Third Country Nationals or Stateless Persons as Refugees or as Persons who otherwise need International Protection and the Content of the Protection granted (OJ L 304/12 of 30.9.2004).
(25) Ker se skupni standardi nanašajo na koncept varnih tretjih držav, kakor ju določa ta direktiva, je praktični učinek koncepta odvisen od tega, ali zadevna tretja država odobri zadevnemu prosilcu vstop na svoje ozemlje.
(25) It follows from the nature of the common standards concerning the safe third country concept as set out in this Directive that the practical effect of the concept depends on whether the third country in question permits the applicant in question to enter its territory.
Glej predlog spremembe za Člen 35A.
See Amendment to Article 35A.
Člen 2, točka (h)
Article 2, point (h)
Pri uporabi direktive morajo države članice upoštevati načelo nediskriminacije v skladu s členom 13 Pogodbe ES in z mednarodnimi konvencijami o človekovih pravicah in zaščiti beguncev.
In applying the Directive, Member States must take account of the principle of non-discrimination as laid down in Article 13 of the EC Treaty and in international conventions on human rights and refugee protection.
Države članice za vse postopke imenujejo organ za presojo, ki bo odgovoren za ustrezno obravnavo prošenj v skladu z določbami te direktive, zlasti s členoma 7(2) , 8 in 10(1) .
Member States shall designate for all procedures a determining authority which will be responsible for an appropriate examination of the applications in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, in particular Articles 7(2) , 8 and 10(1) .
Prosilcem se dovoli, da ostanejo v državi članici izključno zaradi postopka, vse dokler organ za presojo ne sprejme končne odločitve v skladu s postopki na prvi stopnji, določenimi v Poglavju III.
Applicants shall be allowed to remain in the Member State, for the sole purpose of the procedure, until such time as the determining authority has made a final decision in accordance with the procedures at first instance set out in Chapter III.
V več državah članicah se 30–60 % prvotnih negativnih odločitev pozneje ob pritožbi razveljavi.
In several Member States, 30-60% of initial negative decisions are subsequently overturned on appeal.
V zvezi z zadnjim stavkom: zaskrbljenost, da to državam članicam ne omogoča podelitve dovoljenj za prebivanje, kar presega pristojnost ES za določitev minimalnih standardov na tem področju.
Regarding final phrase: concerns this does not allow Member States to grant residence permits at all, thus in excess of EC's competence to establish only minimum standards in the field.
Brez poseganja v člen 23(4)(i) države članice zagotovijo, da se prošnja za azil ne zavrne niti ne izključi iz obravnave zaradi tega , ker ni bila vložena v najkrajšem možnem času.
Without prejudice to Article 23 (4) (i), Member States shall ensure that applications for asylum are neither rejected nor excluded from examination on the grounds that they have not been made as soon as possible.
Organi iz Poglavja V imajo prek organa za presojo ali prosilca ali kako drugače dostop do splošnih informacij iz odstavka 2(b), potrebnih za izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog.
The authorities referred to in Chapter V shall , through the determining authority or the applicant or otherwise , have access to the general information referred to in paragraph 2(b), necessary for the fulfilment of their task.
Organi iz Poglavja V morajo imeti prek organa za presojo dostop do splošnih informacij iz odstavka 2(b), potrebnih za izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog.
The authorities referred to in Chapter V must , through the determining authority, have access to the general information referred to in paragraph 2(b), necessary for the fulfilment of their task.
Neobveznost, da imajo pritožbeni organi dostop do dokumentov iz 2(b), ogroža obseg prošnje 2(b).
Not making it mandatory for appeals authorities to have access to documents referred to in 2(b) undermines the scope of 2(b)'s application.
Nejasna izjava o tem, katera stran mora pritožbenim organom zagotoviti dokumente, lahko povzroči, da nobena stran ne bo zagotovila teh podatkov.
Not clearly stating which party is to provide appeals authorities with the documents lays open the possibility of no party providing the information.
Člen 9, odstavek 1, točka (c)
Article 9, paragraph 1, point (c)
(c) ne sme se jim odreči možnost stika z UNHCR ali katero koli drugo organizacijo, ki deluje v imenu UNHCR na ozemlju države članice na podlagi sporazuma z navedeno državo članico ;
(c) they must not be denied the opportunity to communicate with the UNHCR or with any other organisation working on behalf of the UNHCR in the territory of the Member State pursuant to an agreement with that Member State ;
(c) imeti morajo možnost stika z UNHCR ali katero koli drugo organizacijo, ki dela s prosilci za azil na ozemlju države članice;
(c) they must be given the opportunity to communicate with the UNHCR or with any other organisation working with asylum seekers in the territory of the Member State;
Člen 9 mora izražati zahtevano raven pozitivnega sodelovanja z UNHCR in njenimi delegati.
Article 9 needs to reflect a requisite degree of positive cooperation with the UNHCR and its delegates.
Člen 10, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1
Article 10, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1
Preden organ za presojo sprejme odločitev, ima prosilec pravico do osebnega razgovora o njegovi prošnji za azil z osebo, ki je pristojna in v okviru mednarodnega prava v celoti usposobljena na področju vprašanj v zvezi z azilom in begunci za vodenje takšnega razgovora in sprejemanje odločitev na podlagi mednarodne zakonodaje/zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Before a decision is taken by the determining authority, the applicant shall have the right to a personal interview on his/her application for asylum with a person competent and fully qualified under international law in the field of asylum and refugee matters to conduct such an interview and take a decision under international/Community law.
Razgovor se izvede objektivno in popolnoma neodvisno.
The interview should be conducted in an objective way and in total independence.
Države članice zagotovijo sestavo državnega registra pristojnih oseb, ki so na razpolago za izvedbo osebnih razgovorov s prosilci za azil v vseh državah članicah.
Member States shall ensure the creation of a national register of competent persons available to conduct the personal interviews of asylum applicants in all the Member States.
Tisti, ki so vpisani v register, so dolžni spoštovati nacionalni kodeks ravnanja ali kodeks ravnanja Skupnosti, da se zagotovi objektivna, nepristranska in zanesljiva izvedba razgovorov s prosilci za azil.
Those listed on the register should be obliged to respect a national or Community code of conduct designed to ensure that interviews of asylum applicants are carried out objectively, impartially and faithfully.
Države članice lahko ponudijo možnost osebnega razgovora tudi vsaki odrasli osebi med vzdrževanci iz člena 5(3).
Member States may also give the opportunity of a personal interview to each adult among the dependants referred to in Article 5(3).
Države članice morajo ponuditi možnost osebnega razgovora tudi vsaki odrasli osebi med vzdrževanci iz člena 5(3).
Member States must also give the opportunity of a personal interview to each adult among the dependants referred to in Article 5(3).
Države članice lahko v nacionalni zakonodaji opredelijo primere, v katerih se možnost osebnega razgovora ponudi mladoletni osebi ob upoštevanju stopnje zrelosti posameznika in psiholoških travm, ki jih je pretrpel/a .
Member States may determine in national legislation the cases in which a minor shall be given the opportunity of a personal interview , taking into account the individual's level of maturity and any psychological trauma he/she has endured.
Spraševalec mora upoštevati, da je zaradi let mladoletnikovo poznavanje razmer v državi izvora lahko omejeno.
The interviewer shall bear in mind that due to his/her age, the minor's knowledge of conditions in the country of origin may be limited.
Člen 10, odstavek 2, točka (b)
Article 10, paragraph 2, point (b)
(b) se je pristojni organ že sestal s prosilcem, da bi mu pomagal pri izpolnjevanju njegove prošnje in predložitvi bistvenih podatkov v zvezi s prošnjo v smislu člena 4(2) Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES; ali
(b) the competent authority has already had a meeting with the applicant for the purpose of assisting him/her with filling his/her application and submitting the essential information regarding the application, in terms of Article 4(2) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC; or
(b) se je pristojni organ že sestal s prosilcem, da bi mu pomagal pri izpolnjevanju njegove prošnje in predložitvi bistvenih podatkov v zvezi s prošnjo v smislu člena 4(2) Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES , in je prosilec na srečanju s pristojnim organom pisno potrdil, da meni, da je na tem srečanju lahko ustrezno predstavil svoj primer ; ali
(b) the competent authority has already had a meeting with the applicant for the purpose of assisting him/her with filling his /her application and submitting the essential information regarding the application, in terms of Article 4(2) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC , and the applicant has confirmed in writing at his/her meeting with the competent authority that he/she believes he/she has had sufficient opportunity at that meeting to present his/her case ; or
Da se zagotovi pravičnost postopka in pravilnost odločitev, je treba prosilcem prepustiti odločitev, ali so imeli ustrezno možnost, da predstavijo svoj primer.
To ensure fairness of procedures and accuracy of decisions, it should be left to the applicant to determine if they believe they have had sufficient opportunity to present their case.
Člen 10, odstavek 2, točka (c)
Article 10, paragraph 2, point (c)
Osebno pričanje je pogosto odločilnega pomena pri odločanju in lahko igra bistveno vlogo pri razjasnjevanju napak ali očitnih neskladnosti.
Personal testimony is often decisive for determinations, and can be vital to clarify errors or apparent inconsistencies.
Omejevanje pravic do razgovora občutno ogroža pravičnost postopkov in pravilnost odločitev.
Limiting interview rights will significantly undermine the fairness of procedures and accuracy of decisions.
(glej povzetek UNHCR) Nadalje, močne skrbi iz člena 23(4)(j) lahko temeljijo le na subjektivnem mnenju.
(see UNHCR Summary) Further, strong concerns that Article 23 (4) (j) is can merely be based on a subjective opinion.
(Pripravljavka mnenja je zaskrbljena, da je to namenjeno omejevanju administrativnih in delovnih stroškov držav članic in ne zagotavljanju, da je prosilec deležen vseh možnosti za pravično dodelitev azila).
(Your Draftswoman is concerned this is more to limit the burden on administrative and labour costs for Member States than about ensuring applicant receives all possible opportunity to rightfully receive asylum).
Osebni razgovor se opusti tudi, kadar iz upravičenih razlogov ni izvedljiv, zlasti kadar pristojni organ meni, da je prosilec nezmožen za osebni razgovor ali ga ne more opraviti zaradi trajnih okoliščin, na katere ne more vplivati .
The personal interview may also be omitted , where it is not reasonably practicable, in particular where the competent authority is of the opinion that the applicant is unfit or unable to be interviewed owing to enduring circumstances beyond his/her control.
Kadar obstaja dvom , lahko države članice zahtevajo potrdilo zdravnika ali psihologa.
When in doubt, Member States may require a medical or psychological certificate.
Osebni razgovor se opusti ali prekine tudi, kadar spraševalec meni, da ima prosilec duševne ali čustvene motnje, ki ovirajo normalno preverjanje njegovega/njenega primera.
The personal interview may also be omitted or terminated where the interviewer believes an applicant may have a mental or emotional disturbance which impedes a normal examination of his/her case.
V takšnih primerih je treba poiskati zdravniški nasvet v zvezi z zdravjem prosilca ter države članice morajo zahtevati, kadar obstaja dvom, potrdilo zdravnika ali psihologa.
In such instances, medical advice concerning the applicant's health must be sought from a medical practitioner and Member States shall, when in doubt, require a medical or psychological certificate.
Sprejeti je treba vse razumne ukrepe za izvedbo razgovora.
All reasonable measures must be taken to conduct an interview.
Drugi del tega člena resno ogroža pravičnost postopka in pravilnost odločitev.
The second part of this Article severely undermines the fairness of procedures and the accuracy of decisions.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so prosilci, ki se ne morejo udeležiti ali zaključiti osebnega razgovora zaradi fizičnega ali psihološkega zdravja, fizične ali duševne motnje, ali posebne čustvene motnje, deležni posebne pozornosti, da se zaščiti poštenost postopkov.
Member States shall ensure that an applicant who cannot attend or complete a personal interview owing to his/her state of medical and/or psychological health, physical or mental disability, or particular emotional disturbance, is given specific attention in order to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings.
Če se osebni razgovor v skladu s tem členom ne opravi, to organu za presojo ne prepreči, da sprejme odločitev o prošnji za azil , če je razlog za to povezan s členi 2(b) in (c), 10(3), 20(1), 23(4)(a), (c), (g), (h) in (j) in odstavka 3 tega člena .
The absence of a personal interview in accordance with this Article shall not prevent the determining authority from taking a decision on an application for asylum if the absence is for reasons connected with Articles 2(b) and (c), 10(3), 20(1), 23(4)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j), and paragraph 3 of this Article .
V takšnih primerih mora biti vsaki osebi dana možnost, da jo zastopa skrbnik ali pravni zastopnik v primeru mladoletnikov ali svetovalec ali pravni svetovalec, kot je ustrezno.
In such cases, each person must be given the opportunity to be represented, by a guardian or a legal representative in the case of minors, or a counsellor or legal adviser as appropriate.
Zagotovilo, da se upoštevajo pravice mladoletnikov in drugih vzdrževancev.
Ensuring the rights of minors and other dependants are met.
Če tega ne bo storila, to pomeni, razen če to popravi, razveljavitev vseh posledično sprejetih negativnih ukrepov.
Failure to do so shall, if not remedied, invalidate any subsequent negative action taken.
V zagotovilo, da se prosilcu pravice ne odvzamejo zaradi administrativnih napak.
To ensure applicant's rights are not withdrawn due to any administrative failures.
(a) zagotovijo, da je oseba, ki opravlja razgovor, ustrezno usposobljena , da kolikor je mogoče upošteva osebne in splošne okoliščine v zvezi s prošnjo, vključno s poreklom ali ranljivostjo prosilca, in da
(a) ensure that the person who conducts the interview is sufficiently competent to take account of the personal or general circumstances surrounding the application, including the applicant’s cultural origin or vulnerability, insofar as it is possible to do so, and