natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Z nadaljnjimi sklepi Parlamenta se je potem izoblikovalo dosledno pojmovanje imunitete evropskih poslancev, ki je načeloma neodvisno od različnih praks nacionalnih parlamentov.
Parliament's decisions have gradually forged a coherent notion of European parliamentary immunity which is, in principle, independent of the various practices of the national parliaments.
Na ta način so odpravljene možne razlike v obravnavi poslancev iz različnih držav.
This avoids differences in treatment between Members resulting from their nationality.
Iz tega sledi, da Evropski parlament ne glede na obravnavo imunitete v posameznih nacionalnih zakonodajah uporablja lastna dosledna načela pri sprejemanju odločitve glede odvzema ali zaščite imunitete določenega poslanca.
Consequently, whereas immunity existing under national law is considered, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles in deciding whether to waive the immunity of a Member or not.
Namen poslanske imunitete je zaščiti svobodo izražanja in svobodo do politične razprave poslancev.
Parliamentary immunity exists to protect Members' freedom of expression and freedom of political debate.
Pristojni odbor Parlamenta je vedno dosledno izhajal iz temeljnega načela, da imuniteta ne bo odvzeta v primerih, ko dejanja obtoženih poslancev tako ali drugače spadajo na področje njihovega političnega delovanja.
Parliament's competent committee has therefore consistently held that it is a fundamental principle that in all cases where the acts of the Member standing accused form part of his or her political activity or are directly related to such activity, immunity will not be waived.
To na primer vključuje mnenje, ki ga poslanec v okviru svoje politične dejavnosti izrazi med demonstracijami, javnimi shodi, v političnih publikacijah, tisku, knjigah, na televiziji, ob podpisu političnega traktata ali na sodišču.
This includes, for example, expressions of opinion deemed to be covered by a Member's political activity made at demonstrations, at public meetings, in political publications, in the press, in a book, on television, by signing a political tract and even in a court of law.
(c) Omenjeno načelo je skupaj z drugimi argumenti podlaga za odvzem oziroma zaščito imunitete, zlasti ob "fumus persecutionis" , tj. predpostavki, da se s kazenskim pregonom želi škodovati politični dejavnosti poslanca.
(c) This principle is taken together with other arguments for or against the waiver of immunity, particularly "fumus persecutionis", i.e. the presumption that the prosecution originates in an intention to cause prejudice to the Member's political activities.
Kot je opredeljeno v obrazložitvi Donnezovega poročila, pojem " fumus persecutionis" v bistvu pomeni, da do odvzema imunitete ne pride, ko obstaja utemeljen sum, da se s pregonom skuša namerno škodovati politični dejavnosti določenega poslanca.
As it is defined in the explanatory statement of the Donnez report the concept of " fumus persecutionis " means, in essence, that immunity is not waived where the suspicion exists that the prosecution is based on an intention to prejudice the Member's political activities.
Če denimo postopek sproži politični nasprotnik, potem ob pomanjkanju nasprotnih dokazov imuniteta ne bo odvzeta, ker velja, da se s postopkom skuša škodovati poslancu brez povračila škode.
For instance, where proceedings are brought by a political adversary, in the absence of evidence to the contrary immunity will not be waived in so far as the proceedings have to be regarded as intended to harm the Member concerned and not to obtain reparation for damage.
Podobno ne pride do odvzema imunitete poslancu, če je sodni postopek sprožen v okoliščinah, ki bi lahko navajale na misel, da je do postopka prišlo izključno z namenom škodovati temu poslancu.
Likewise, where proceedings are brought in circumstances such as to suggest that they have been initiated solely in order to harm the Member concerned, immunity will not be waived.
UTEMELJITEV PREDLAGANE ODLOČITVE
JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED DECISION
Odbor za pravne zadeve je podrobno obravnaval člene Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti, ki bi se lahko uporabljali.
The Committee on Legal Affairs has discussed in detail the articles of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities which may apply.
Odbor se je odločil, da je treba v povezavi z zgoraj omenjenimi načeli obravnavani primer pregledati v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965.
The Committee decided that the present case has to be examined under Article 9 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965 in connection with the above mentioned principles.
Člen 9 navaja: "Zoper člana Skupščine se ne sme začeti preiskava, ne sme biti priprt niti se zoper njega ne sme začeti sodni postopek zaradi mnenja ali glasu, ki ga je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti".
Article 9 states that 'Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties'.
Absolutna imuniteta velja samo za mnenja ali glasove, ki jih poslanec izrazi med opravljanjem svojih dolžnosti.
That absolute immunity only applies to 'opinions expressed or votes cast by [Members] in the performance of their duties'.
Sakellariou, sklep z dne 23. septembra 2003, 2003/2023 (IMM). .
see the case concerning the request for defence of the immunity of J. Sakellariou, decision of 23 September 2003, 2003/2023(IMM) . .
(a) Ob upoštevanju teh načel odbor ugotavlja, da na tiskovni konferenci 11. oktobra 2004 poslanec Gollnisch ni uveljavljal svobode govora, ki mu pripada pri "opravljanju dolžnosti" poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
(a) Applying these principles the committee notes that, when Mr Gollnich expressed his opinion during the press conference of 11 October 2004, he was not exercising his freedom of speech in connection with "the performance of his duties" as a Member of the European Parliament.
Glede na pojasnila, ki jih je navedel Bruno Gollnisch, je tedaj svoje mnenje o pokolu v katinskem gozdu izrazil v odgovoru na zastavljena vprašanja novinarjev v zvezi z njegovimi zelo kritičnimi pripombami glede političnega vmešavanja v politična stališča profesorjev univerze Lyon III, ki ga je čutiti v Roussojevem poročilu.
According to the explanations given by Mr Gollnisch, he expressed his opinion about the massacre of Katyn in response to questions from journalists about his highly critical remarks relating to political interference in the Rousso report on the political views of Lyon III University academics.
Njegovi odgovori so se neposredno navezovali na poklicno dejavnost Gollnischa kot profesorja na univerzi Lyon III in niso imele nobene povezave z njegovimi dolžnostmi poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
The statements were directly related with the professional activities of Mr Gollnisch as professor at the Lyon III University and had nothing to do with his duties as a Member of the European Parliament.
Zato ne moremo trditi, da je Gollnisch tedaj "opravljal dolžnosti" kot poslanec Evropskega parlamenta.
It cannot therefore be maintained that he was acting 'in the performance of his duties' as a Member of the European Parliament.
(b) Določila člena 7(6) Poslovnika EP so izpolnjena.
(b) Rule 7(6) of the Rules of Procedure is satisfied.
Glede na podatke, ki smo jih prejeli od francoskega pravosodnega ministrstva, kazenska preiskava proti Brunu Gollnischu slednjemu ne preprečuje opravljanje njegovih dolžnosti.
According to the information given by the French Ministry of Justice, the criminal inquiry carried out against Mr Gollnisch does not hinder him in the performance of his duties, for example by preventing him from participating in Parliament's sessions, committee meetings, etc.
Poleg tega je zaslišanje na Gollnischevo prošnjo lahko prestavljeno.
Furthermore, the hearing can be postponed if Mr Gollnisch so requests.
Skladno s členom 7(2) Poslovnika lahko Odbor predlaga samo sklep, ki priporoča zgolj sprejetje ali zavrnitev zahteve za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev.
According to Rule 7(2) of the Rules of Procedure the Committee's proposal for a decision should simply recommend the adoption or rejection of the request for the defence of immunity and privileges.
Na osnovi vseh navedenih razmišljanj Odbor za pravne zadeve po preučitvi razlogov za zaščito imunitete in proti njej priporoča, da se zahteva za zaščito imunitete poslanca Gollnischa zavrne.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the request for the defence of Mr Gollnisch's immunity be rejected.
Zahteva za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Bruna Gollnischa
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Bruno Gollnisch
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 1999/62/ES o cestnih pristojbinah za uporabo določene infrastrukture za težka tovorna vozila
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................6
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................22
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (9856/2005 – C6‑0274/2005 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (9856/2005 – C6‑0274/2005 ),
Še ni na voljo. ,
Not yet available.
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0377/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0377/2005 ),
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 1999/62/ES o cestnih pristojbinah za uporabo določene infrastrukture za težka tovorna vozila
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 1999/62/ES o cestnih pristojbinah za uporabo določene infrastrukture za tovorna vozila
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures
(2) Pravičnejši sistem pristojbin za uporabo cestne infrastrukture je ključnega pomena za spodbujanje trajnostnega prometa v Skupnosti.
(2) A fairer system of charging for the use of road infrastructure is crucial in order to encourage sustainable transport in the Community.
Cilj, da se obstoječe cestno omrežje kar najbolje uporablja in da se negativni vpliv tega omrežja pomembno zmanjša, bi moral biti v korist zdrave gospodarske rasti in pravilnega delovanja notranjega trga dosežen brez uvajanja dodatnih obremenitev za prevoznike.
The objective of making optimum use of the existing road network and achieving a significant reduction in its negative impact should be achieved without imposing additional burdens on operators in the interests of sound economic growth and the proper functioning of the single market.
(2) Pravičnejši sistem pristojbin za uporabo cestne infrastrukture , temelječ na načelih "uporabnik plača" in "onesnaževalec plača", je ključnega pomena za spodbujanje trajnostnega prometa v Skupnosti.
(2) A fairer system of charging for the use of road infrastructure , based on the ‘user pays’ and the ‘polluter pays’ principles, is crucial in order to encourage sustainable transport in the Community.
Cilj, da se obstoječe cestno omrežje kar najbolje uporablja in da se negativni vpliv tega omrežja pomembno zmanjša, bi moral biti v korist zdrave gospodarske rasti in pravilnega delovanja notranjega trga dosežen tako, da se izogne dvojnemu obdavčevanju in brez uvajanja dodatnih obremenitev za prevoznike , vključno z odročnimi regijami .
The objective of making optimum use of the existing road network and achieving a significant reduction in its negative impact should be achieved in such a way as to avoid double taxation, and without imposing additional burdens on operators in the interests of sound economic growth and the proper functioning of the single market , including outlying regions .
(3a) Evropski svet je v 29. odstavku sklepov s svoje seje 15. in 16. junija 2001 v Göteborgu izjavil, da mora trajnostna prometna politika rešiti vprašanja vedno večjega obsega prometa in rastoče ravni zastojev, hrupa in onesnaževanja, pa tudi spodbujati uporabo okolju prijaznih prevoznih sredstev ter polno internalizacijo socialnih in okoljskih stroškov.
(3a) In paragraph 29 of the conclusions of its meeting of 15 and 16 June 2001 in Göteborg , the European Council stated that a sustainable transport policy should tackle rising volumes of traffic and levels of congestion, noise and pollution and encourage the use of environment-friendly modes of transport as well as the full internalisation of social and environmental costs.
(5) Mednarodni prevozi v cestnem prometu so osredotočeni na vseevropsko cestno prometno omrežje.
(5) International road transport operations are concentrated on the trans-European road transport network.
Poleg tega je dobro delovanje notranjega trga življenjskega pomena za komercialne prevoze.
Furthermore, the operation of the internal market is vital to commercial transport.
Okvir Skupnosti bi se moral tako uporabljati za komercialni promet na vseevropskem cestnem omrežju, kakor je opredeljeno v Odločbi št. 1692/96/ES o smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj vseevropskega prometnega omrežja.
Consequently, the Community framework must apply to commercial transport on the trans-European road network as defined in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network.
Države članice bi morale imeti pravico, da lahko v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti in ob upoštevanju Pogodbe svobodno zaračunavajo cestnine in/ali uporabnine na cestah izven vseevropskega cestnega omrežja .
Member States must, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity , be free to apply tolls and/or user charges on roads other than those on the trans-European road network, in compliance with the rules of the Treaty.
Okvir Skupnosti bi se moral tako uporabljati za komercialni promet na vseevropskem cestnem omrežju, kakor je opredeljeno v Odločbi št. 1692/96/ES o smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj vseevropskega prometnega omrežja.
Consequently, the Community framework must apply to commercial transport on the trans-European road network as defined in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network .
Da bi se izognili preusmeritvam prometa, ki bi lahko imele resne posledice za prometno varnost in optimalno izrabo cestnega omrežja, morajo imeti države članice možnost, da uvedejo pristojbine na vseh cestah, ki so neposredna konkurenca vseevropskemu omrežju (glavno cestno omrežje).
In order to avoid traffic being diverted, with potentially serious consequences for road safety and the optimum use of the transport network, Member States must be able to introduce charging on any road which is in direct competition with the trans-European network (main road network).
V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti imajo države članice, v skladu z njihovimi pooblastili pa tudi regionalne in lokalne oblasti pravico, da ob upoštevanju Pogodbe svobodno zaračunavajo cestnine in/ali uporabnine na cestah izven glavnega cestnega omrežja .
In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity , Member States and, in accordance with their respective powers, regional and local authorities are free to apply tolls and/or user charges on roads other than those on the main road network, in compliance with the rules of the Treaty.
Poleg določb te direktive lahko države članice ali zadevni pristojni organi v skladu s členom 9 Direktive 1999/62/ES zaračunavajo dodatne dajatve za mestni promet in regulatorne dajatve na kateri koli cesti, zlasti v mestnih okoljih, vključno na cestah TEN, ki prečkajo mestno okolje.
In addition to the provisions of this directive Member States or the relevant competent authorities may apply additional urban traffic charges and regulatory charges on any road notably in urban areas including TEN roads crossing an urban area, according to article 9 of Directive 1999/62/EC.
(6) Zaradi stroškovne učinkovitosti pri izvajanju cestninskih sistemov ni nujno, da se na celotni infrastrukturi, za katero se plačuje cestnina, uvedejo omejitve dostopa za nadziranje zaračunanih cestnin.
(6) For reasons of cost efficiency in the implementation of tolling systems, the entire infrastructure to which a toll relates may not necessarily be subject to access restrictions controlling tolls charged.
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da to direktivo izvajajo tako, da cestnine zaračunavajo samo v določeni točki infrastrukture na katero se cestnina nanaša.
Member States may choose to implement this Directive through the use of tolls at only a particular point on the infrastructure to which the toll relates.
Pri tem nelokalni promet ne bo zapostavljen.
This shall not discriminate against non-local traffic.
(11) Kadar države članice pobirajo cestnine ali uporabnine za uporabo cest v vseevropskem cestnem omrežju, bi morale pri svojih načrtih vzdrževanja dati ustrezno prednost cestam, za katere se pobirajo te pristojbine.
(11) Where Member States levy tolls or user charges for use of roads in the trans-European road network, the roads subject to charging should be given appropriate priority in the maintenance schedules of Member States .
(11) Kadar države članice pobirajo cestnine ali uporabnine za uporabo cest v vseevropskem cestnem omrežju, se ob upoštevanju uravnotežene in trajnostne zgraditve prometnih omrežij ti prihodki uporabljajo za vzdrževanje zadevne infrastrukture in celotnega prometnega sektorja.
(11) Where Member States levy tolls or user charges for use of roads in the trans-European road network, this revenue should be used for the maintenance of the infrastructure concerned and the transport sector as a whole, in the interest of a balanced and sustainable development of transport networks.
(12) Posebno pozornost bi bilo treba posvetiti gorskim regijam kot so Alpe in Pireneji.
(12) Particular attention should be devoted to mountain regions such as the Alps or the Pyrenees.
Novi infrastrukturni projekti večjega obsega so velikokrat propadli zaradi pomanjkanja precejšnjih finančnih sredstev, ki bi bila za te projekte potrebna.
The launch of major new infrastructure projects has often failed because the substantial financial resources they would require were not available.
V takšnih regijah se od uporabnikov torej lahko zahteva, da plačujejo pribitek, iz katerega se financirajo bistveni projekti, ki so velikega pomena za Evropo, vključno s tistimi, ki vključujejo različne vrste prometa po istem koridorju.
In such regions, users may therefore be required to pay a mark-up to finance essential projects of very high European value, including those involving another mode of transport in the same corridor.
Pribitek bi moral biti vezan na finančne potrebe posameznega projekta.
This amount should be linked to the financial needs of the project.
Vezan pa bi moral biti tudi na osnovno raven cestnin, s čimer bi se izognili umetno visokim pristojbinam na kakšnem izmed koridorjev, kar bi lahko promet preusmerilo na druge koridorje in povzročilo lokalne zastoje ter neučinkovito uporabo omrežij.
It should also be linked to the basic level of the tolls in order to avoid artificially high charges in any one corridor, which could lead to traffic being diverted to other corridors, thereby causing local congestion problems and inefficient use of networks.
(12) Posebno pozornost bi bilo treba posvetiti gorskim regijam kot so Alpe in Pireneji.
(12) Particular attention should be devoted to mountain regions such as the Alps or the Pyrenees .
V takšnih regijah se od uporabnikov torej lahko zahteva, da plačujejo pribitek, iz katerega se financirajo bistveni projekti, ki so velikega pomena za Evropo, vključno s tistimi, ki vključujejo različne vrste prometa po istem koridorju.
In such regions, users may therefore be required to pay a mark-up to finance essential projects of very high European value, including those involving another mode of transport in the same corridor or the same transport area.
To ne vpliva na določbe člena 9 Direktive 1999/62/ES glede dajatev za mestni promet in regulatornih dajatev.
This leaves unaffected the provisions of article 9 of Directive 1999/62/EC regarding urban traffic charges and regulatory charges.
(14) Za zagotovitev dosledne in usklajene uporabe sistema infrastrukturnih dajatev bi morale nove ureditve cestnin stroške izračunavati skladno s sklopom temeljnih načel ali pa morajo biti stroški določeni na ravni, ki ne presega ravni, ki bi izhajala iz uporabe teh načel.
(14) In order to ensure consistent, harmonised application of the infrastructure charging system, new tolling arrangements should calculate costs in accordance with a set of core principles or be set at a level which does not go beyond that which would result from the application of these principles; these requirements should not apply to existing arrangements unless they are substantially modified in the future; such substantial modifications would include any significant change to the original terms and conditions of the tolling scheme through modification of a contract with the tolling system operator but would exclude changes provided for in the original scheme.
Te zahteve se ne bi smele uporabljati za obstoječe ureditve, razen v primeru, če se slednje v prihodnosti bistveno spremenijo.
In the case of concession contracts, substantial modification could be implemented pursuant to a public procurement process.
Mnenja, ki jih je Komisija sprejela, preden so nove cestninske ureditve uvedene v državah članicah, nikakor ne posegajo v obveznost Komisije, da v skladu s Pogodbo zagotavlja uporabo prava Skupnosti.
Opinions adopted by the Commission prior to the introduction of new tolling arrangements in Member States are entirely without prejudice to the Commission's obligation under the Treaty to ensure that Community law is applied.
(14) Za zagotovitev dosledne in usklajene uporabe sistema infrastrukturnih dajatev bi morale nove ureditve cestnin stroške izračunavati skladno s sklopom temeljnih načel iz Priloge III ali pa morajo biti stroški določeni na ravni, ki ne presega ravni, ki bi izhajala iz uporabe teh načel.
(14) In order to ensure consistent, harmonised application of the infrastructure charging system, new tolling arrangements should calculate costs in accordance with the set of core principles in Annex III or be set at a level which does not go beyond that which would result from the application of these principles; these requirements should not apply to existing arrangements unless they are substantially modified in the future; such substantial modifications would include any significant change to the original terms and conditions of the tolling scheme through modification of a contract with the tolling system operator but would exclude changes provided for in the original scheme.
UVODNA IZJAVA 14A (novo)
RECITAL 14 A (new)
(14a) Da bi zagotovili prihodnjo uporabo načela "onesnaževalec plača" za vsa prevozna sredstva, bi bilo treba razviti enotna načela izračunavanja, ki bi temeljila na znanstveno priznanih podatkih, kar bi omogočilo internalizacijo zunanjih stroškov za vsa prevozna sredstva.
(14a) To ensure the future application of the polluter pays principle for all modes of transport, uniform calculation principles should be developed, based on scientifically recognised data, which will clear the way for the internalisation of external costs for all modes of transport.