natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Monako o ukrepih, ki so enakovredni ukrepom, predvidenim v Direktivi Sveta 2003/48/ES z dne 3. junija 2003 o obdavčevanju dohodkov od prihrankov v obliki plačil obresti
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2004)0733 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0773 )
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Monako o ukrepih, ki so enakovredni ukrepom, predvidenim v Direktivi Sveta 2003/48/ES z dne 3. junija 2003 o obdavčevanju dohodkov od prihrankov v obliki plačil obresti,
– having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments,
– ob upoštevanju členov 94, prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in 300(4)Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 94, Article 300(2), first subparagraph, and (4) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0202/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0202/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6‑0042/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0042/2004 ),
o preverjanju veljavnosti mandatov poslancev
on the verification of credentials
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.............................................................3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION................................................3
PRILOGA I: Seznam poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, katerih mandat je veljaven......................5
declared valid ..............................................................................................................................5
PRILOGA II: Kratek povzetek prejetih spornih zadev.................................................................37
ANNEX II: Summary of disputes referred .................................................................................37
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
– ob upoštevanju Akta o volitvah predstavnikov Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976
– having regard to the Act of 20 September 1976
UL L 278, 8.10.1976, str.
OJ L 278, 8.10.1976, p.
Akt nazadnje spremenjen z odločbo 2002/772/ES, Euratom (UL L 283, 21.10.2002, str.1). ,
As last amended by Decision 2002/772/EC, Euratom (OJ L 283, 21.10.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju členov 3, 4 in 9 ter Priloge I svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 3, 4 and 9 of and Annex I to its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju uradnih obvestil pristojnih organov držav članic o izidih volitev v Evropski parlament,
– having regard to the official notifications from the competent authorities of the Member States concerning the results of the elections to the European Parliament,
– ob upoštevanju prejetih spornih zadev glede veljavnosti izvolitve nekaterih poslancev Evropskega parlamenta,
– having regard to the disputes concerning the validity of the election of certain Members of the European Parliament,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0043/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0043/2004 ),
A. ker je v členu 7(1) in (2) Akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 določeno, katere funkcije so nezdružljive s funkcijo poslanca Evropskega parlamenta,
A. whereas Article 7(1) and (2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 set out the offices that are incompatible with the office of Member of the European Parliament,
B. ker morajo na podlagi člena 9 in Priloge I Poslovnika poslanci natančno prijaviti svoje poklicne dejavnosti kot tudi druge funkcije ali dejavnosti, za katere prejemajo plačilo,
B. whereas, under Rule 9 of and Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, Members are required to make a detailed declaration of their professional activities and any other remunerated functions or activities,
C. ker so vse države članice sporočile Evropskemu parlamentu imena izvoljenih kandidatov, ker pa nekatere izmed njih niso še, v skladu z določbami člena 3(2), Poslovnika, sporočile imen morebitnih nadomestnih kandidatov ter njihovega položaja glede na izide glasovanja ali so to naredile z zamudo,
C. whereas all of the Member States have notified the European Parliament of the names of the elected candidates, although some have still not forwarded - or have done so belatedly - the lists of any substitutes together with their ranking in accordance with the results of the vote, as is required under Rule 3(2) of the Rules of Procedure,
D. ker v nekaterih državah članicah poteka obravnava prejetih spornih zadev glede veljavnosti izvolitve nekaterih poslancev v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo in ker bi posledica takšnih postopkov lahko bilo prenehanje mandata teh poslancev,
E. whereas in some Member States objections to the election of some Members of Parliament are being considered in accordance with national legislation and whereas these procedures could result in the annulment of the election of the Members concerned,
E. ker v skladu s členom 12 Akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 Evropski parlament odloča glede vloženih pritožb v zvezi z mandatom svojih članov v primeru kršitve predpisov zgoraj omenjenega Akta, razen v primerih morebitnih kršitev določb nacionalne volilne zakonodaje, na katero se Akt sklicuje,
F. whereas, pursuant to Article 12 of the Act of 20 September 1976, the European Parliament is required to rule on any disputes concerning the validity of the mandate of its Members only where these relate to breaches of the provisions of the abovementioned act, and not in the case of breaches of the national electoral provisions to which the Act refers,
1. potrjuje ob upoštevanju sklepov pristojnih organov držav članic, v katerih bi morda lahko nastali spori o izidih volitev, veljavnost mandatov poslancev Evropskega parlamenta iz Priloge I tega sklepa, katerih izvolitev so sporočili pristojni nacionalni organi in ki so podali pisne prijave v skladu s členom 7(1) in (2) Akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 in s Prilogo I Poslovnika;
Declares valid, subject to any decisions by the competent authorities of Member States in which the election results have been disputed, the mandate of the Members of the European Parliament listed in Annex I to this decision whose election has been notified by the competent national authorities and who have made the written declarations required on the basis of Article 7(1) and (2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 and Annex I to the Rules of Procedure;
5. poziva pristojne organe držav članic, da brez odloga obravnavajo spore, ki so jim bili predloženi, in da o izidu obvestijo Evropski parlament;
Calls on the competent authorities of the Member States to complete as soon as possible the examination of the objections submitted to them and inform the European Parliament of the outcome;
PRILOGA I: Seznam poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, katerih mandat je veljaven
ANNEX I: List of Members of the European Parliament whose
PO DRŽAVI ČLANICI
BY MEMBER STATE
IZVOLJENI POSLANCI EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT
Češka republika (24)
Czech Republic (24 Members)
(stanje 20. julija 2004)
(situation at 20 July 2004)
Združeno kraljestvo (78)
United Kingdom (78 Members)
Prejete sporne zadeve
Disputes referred:
Natančneje, listo kandidatov je zavrnil I. civilni sektor grškega kasacijskega sodišča, ker ni izpolnjevala pogojev, ki jih v zvezi z legitimacijo predlagateljev liste zahteva grški zakon.
Specifically, the party’s list of candidates was rejected by the First Civil Chamber of the Greek Court of Appeal for failure to meet the requirements of Greek law concerning the legitimisation of persons presenting lists.
Ker se ugovor nanaša na kršitve predpisov nacionalne zakonodaje, se ga v skladu s členom 12 Akta z leta 1976 zavrže .
As the objection concerns a breach of national provisions, it should be deemed inadmissible pursuant to Article 12 of the 1976 Act.
Med drugim opozarja na: različno ravnanje z malimi in velikimi strankami pri dostavi informacij o spremembah zakonodaje glede zgornje meje volilnih stroškov za posamezne kandidate in dejansko onemogočen enakopraven dostop do radiotelevizijske propagande.
He complains in particular of the difference in the treatment accorded to small and large parties as regards provision of information on amendments to legislation on the ceilings for election expenses for individual candidates and the impossibility of securing access on equal terms to radio and television broadcasting slots.
Pritožba, ki je v tej zvezi bila vložena malteškemu volilnemu odboru, je bila zavrnjena.
His complaint to the Maltese Electoral Commission regarding this matter has been rejected.
Juan Pedro PÉREZ BARRERA , iz Španije, oporeka izvolitev poslanca izvoljenega v Španiji.
Mr Juan Pedro PÉREZ BARRERA , Spanish, objects to the election of a Spanish Member of Parliament.
Stanislav PECKA, iz Češke, kandidat na volitvah, se pritožuje zaradi pomanjkljivega zakona o volitvah v Evropski parlament, drugih volilnih zakonov in zakona o volitvah v češki senat.
Mr Stanislav PECKA , Czech national, who stood as a candidate in the elections, complains about the deficient law on elections to the European Parliament, other electoral laws and the law on elections to the Czech Senate.
Friedrich Wilhelm MERCK , iz Nemčije, predsednik odbora evropskih federalistov za evropsko ustavo, oporeka izvolitev poslancev izvoljenih v Zvezni republiki Nemčiji v listi zelenih (Die Grünen).
Mr Friedrich Wilhelm MERCK , German, chairman of the Commission of European Federalists for the European Constitution, is objecting to the election of Members of the European Parliament in the Federal Republic of Germany on the Greens list (Die Grünen).
Porazdelitev kvot med dvema spoloma naj ne bi temeljila na načelu enakosti, saj, medtem ko kandidati ne bi nikakor mogli biti postavljeni na liho mesto liste, bi kandidatke nasprotno lahko bile postavljene na (soda) mesta, rezervirana za kandidate moškega spola.
The division of the two sexes into quotas is not based on the principle of equality since, while male candidates could under no circumstances secure an odd number position on the list, female candidates would still be able to secure the even number positions reserved for male candidates.
Pri tem je treba opozoriti, da se ne zdi, da bi se na kakršen koli način omejevalo načelo o splošnih neposrednih volitvah.
He points out that the principle of universal suffrage should be subject to no restrictions.
Ta se nanaša na pravico, ki jo imajo vsi državljani Unije, da volijo in so izvoljeni brez nobenega razlikovanja.
It concerns the right of all Union citizens to vote and stand in elections without discrimination.
Ukrepi, ki so bili dejansko sprejeti za doseganje ravnovesja med dvema spoloma znotraj volilne liste poleg tega popolnoma upoštevajo načelo enakosti med moškimi in ženskami, s katerim se strinja večina držav članic in ki ga potrjuje člen 23 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
Furthermore, the measures actually taken to secure a balance between the sexes on the electoral list are fully in line with the principle of equal opportunities widely accepted by the Member States and set forth in Article 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
To načelo, ki se ga še zdaleč ne sme gledati le sz formalnega vidika, dovoljuje in celo spodbuja sprejetje ukrepov, ki določajo posebne ugodnosti v prid manj zastopanega spola.
Far from being a merely formal provision, this principle authorises and indeed seeks to promote the adoption of measures to accord specific advantages to the under-represented sex.
Kakor je Evropski parlament že večkrat ugotovil, ni dvoma, da se odstotek izvoljenih poslank še zmeraj nahaja krepko pod polovico članov skupščine.
There is no doubt that, as the European Parliament has repeatedly pointed out, the percentage of female Members of Parliament is still well below half of the total number.
Tadeus ANDZEJEVSKI iz Litve, kandidat na volitvah, oporeka litovsko porazdelitev poslanskih mest v Evropskem parlamentu.
Mr Tadeus ANDZEJEVSKI , Lithuanian, candidate in the elections, objects to the way in which the European Parliament seats have been allocated in Lithuania.
Pritožuje se zlasti zaradi tega, ker lista "Skupaj smo sila", ki predstavlja koalicijo regionalnih strank poljske in ruske manjšine, ni dobila niti enega poslanskega mesta, kljub temu, da je presegla volilni prag 5% za porazdelitev poslanskih mest, ki ga predvideva litovski volilni zakon, medtem ko je ostalih šest listin dobilo 13 poslanskih mest, ki pripadajo Litvi.
He complains in particular that the list ‘Together we are strong’, representing a coalition of regional parties of the Polish and Russian minorities, was not allocated a single seat, despite exceeding the 5% threshold for the allocation of seats laid down by Lithuanian electoral law, whereas Lithuania’s 13 seats were divided up among six other lists.
Ta porazdelitev poslanskih mest s strani centralnega volilnega odbora naj bi ne bila v skladu s členom 3 Akta iz leta 1976, po katerem: "Države članice lahko določijo najnižji volilni prag za dodelitev poslanskih mest.
He maintains that the allocation of seats made by the Central Electoral Commission was in breach of Article 3 of the 1976 Act according to which, ‘Member States may set a minimum threshold for the allocation of seats.
Na ravni države ta prag ne sme presegati 5% oddanih glasov".
At national level this threshold may not exceed 5% of votes cast’.
Poleg zgoraj omenjenega člena 3 je treba sicer pomniti, da člen 1(1) Akta določa, da so člani Evropskega parlamenta izvoljeni na podlagi proporcionalne zastopanosti, pri čemer se uporabi sistem list ali en prenosljivi glas.
In addition to Article 3, it should be pointed out that Article 1(1) of the Act stipulates that the election, using the list system or the single transferable vote, must be based on proportional representation.
Vendar se ne zdi, da bi bilo možno tolmačiti člen 3 Akta v smislu, da se vsaki listi, ki preseže volilni prag 5%, zagotovi dodelitev vsaj enega poslanskega mesta.
However, it does not seem possible to interpret Article 3 of the Act as meaning that any list which exceeds the 5% threshold should be automatically allocated at least one seat, since in the case of Member States with a small number of seats (fewer than 20, as is the case for Lithuania), this is impossible for simple arithmetical reasons.
Kajti zgolj dejstvo, da se je presegel volilni prag, v primeru držav članic, ki imajo majhno število poslanskih mest (manjše od 20, kot v primeru Litve), iz čisto matematičnih razlogov ne implicira samodejne dodelitve poslanskega mesta.
In the final analysis and in the light of the documentation submitted, the complaint cannot be seen as justified and there are no grounds for not validating the mandate of the Members whose election has been notified by Lithuania.
Zato je pritožba v skladu s členom 12 Akta neutemeljena .
The objection should therefore be considered unfounded pursuant to Article 12 of the 1976 Act.
Veljavni normativni in postopkovni okvir za preverjanje veljavnosti mandatov
Legislative and procedural framework governing the verification of credentials
Evropski parlament mora, v skladu s členom 12 Akta o volitvah predstavnikov v Evropskem parlamentu s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami, v različici, kot jo je Svet popravil 25. junija/ 22. septembra 2002, preveriti veljavnost mandatov svojih članov.
Under the terms of Article 12 of the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, as amended by the Council decision of 25 June/22 September 2002, the European Parliament is required to verify the credentials of its Members.
V ta namen se seznani z uradno razglašenimi izidi v državah članicah in odloča v sporih, ki lahko izhajajo iz določb zgoraj omenjenega akta, razen v tistih, ki izhajajo iz nacionalnih predpisov, na katere se akt sklicuje.
For this purpose, it takes note of the results declared officially by the Member States and rules on any disputes which may arise out of the provisions of the Act, other than those arising out of the national provisions to which the Act refers.
Člena 3 in 4 Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta določata oblike preverjanja veljavnosti mandatov in nalagata pristojnemu odboru (v skladu s Prilogo VI Poslovnika, Odboru za pravne zadeve) dolžnost predložitve Parlamentu poročila o preverjanju veljavnosti mandatov poslancev in o morebitnih sporih.
Rules 3 and 4 of the European Parliament's Rules of Procedure specify the details of the verification process and require the committee concerned (according to Annex VI of the Rules, the Committee on Legal Affairs) to submit a report to Parliament on the verification of credentials and on any disputes.
To poročilo torej obravnava izide neposrednih volitev v Evropski parlament, ki so potekale od 10. do 13. junija 2004, in temelji na uradnem obvestilu vseh držav članic o dokončnih izidih volitev, v katerem so podrobno navedena imena izvoljenih kandidatov in morebitnih nadomestnih kandidatov ter njihov položaj glede na izide glasovanja (člen 3(2) Poslovnika).
This report therefore relates to the results of the direct elections to the European Parliament held from 10 to 13 June 2004 and is based on the official notifications by all the Member States of the full election results including the names of the elected Members and any substitutes together with their ranking in accordance with the results of the vote (Rule 3(2) of the Rules of Procedure).
V skladu s členom 5 Akta se je mandat poslancev pričel z začetkom prve seje Parlamenta, 20. julija 2004.
Under the terms of Article 5 of the Act, the term of office of Members began with the opening of the first sitting of Parliament on 20 July 2004.
V skladu s členom 3(5) Poslovnika se poslanec polnopravno udeležuje sej Parlamenta in njegovih teles, dokler Parlament ne preveri veljavnosti mandata poslanca oziroma ne odloči o morebitnem sporu.
In accordance with Rule 3(5) of the Rules of Procedure, a Member may take his seat in Parliament and on its bodies and enjoy all the rights attaching thereto until such time as his or her credentials have been verified or a ruling given on any dispute.
To pomeni, da poslanci lahko polnopravno izvajajo svoj mandat do sprejetja, s strani plenarne skupščine, poročila o preverjanju veljavnosti mandatov poslancev in o morebitnih sporih.
Accordingly, Members may exercise their rights in full until the adoption in plenary of the report on the verification of credentials or on any disputes.
Člen 3(2) Poslovnika določa, da veljavnosti mandata poslanca ni mogoče potrditi, če ni podal pisnih izjav v skladu s členom 7 Akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 in Prilogo I Poslovnika.
Rules 3(2) of the Rules of Procedure stipulates that the validity of a Members' mandate may not be confirmed unless the written declarations required on the basis of Article 7 of the Act of 20 September 1976 and Annex I to the Rules of Procedure have been made.
Te izjave, po eni strani zadevajo dejstvo, da poslanec ni nosilec nobene izmed funkcij naštetih v členu 7 Akta - funkcije, ki na osnovi prava Skupnosti so nezdružljive s funkcijo poslanca Evropskega parlamenta - in, po drugi, njegove poklicne dejavnosti in ostale funkcije ali dejavnosti, za katere prejema plačilo, in podpore bodisi finančne bodisi v obliki osebja ali stvari, ki jo prejema poleg sredstev, ki jih zagotavlja Parlament, in mu jo v zvezi z njegovo politično dejavnostjo nudijo tretje osebe, katerih identiteta se razkrije.
The first of the declarations is to the effect that the Member does not hold any of the offices listed in Article 7 of the Act - offices incompatible with membership of the European Parliament under Community law - and the second details the Members' professional activities, any other remunerated functions or activities, and any support, whether financial or in terms of staff or material, additional to that provided by Parliament in connection with his political activities by third parties.
Te izjave je treba podati na dveh ločenih obrazcih, ki so jih poslanci dobili po izvolitvi.
These declarations have to be made on two separate forms handed to Members after their election.
Za predložitev teh izjav je odgovoren le poslanec, ki to izvede vestno in pri polni zavesti.
Making the declarations is the sole responsibility of the Member, who must make them to the best of his or her knowledge.
Spremembe Akta z leta 1976, ki so začele veljati 1. aprila 2004, so določile nove primere nezdružljivosti, med katerimi je vredno omeniti nezdružljivost s funkcijo člana nacionalnega parlamenta (razen v primeru poslancev, ki so bili izvoljeni na Irskem in v Združenem kraljestvu), ki začne veljati od volitev v Evropski parlament leta 2004.
The amendments to the 1976 Act, which came into force on 1 April 2004, introduced new cases of incompatibility, including in particular incompatibility with membership of a national parliament (except for Members elected in Ireland and the United Kingdom) with effect from the European Parliament elections in 2004.
Potrebno je poudariti, da je zgoraj omejeni Akt del primarne evropske zakonodaje in da ga kot takega morajo spoštovati institucije Unije in držav članic.
It should also be pointed out that the 1976 Act constitutes European primary law and as such must be observed by the Union institutions and Member States.
To pomeni, da je Parlament pravno obvezan se nemudoma seznaniti z utemeljenostjo morebitnih razlogov nezdružljivosti v skladu s členom 7 Akta in posledično potrditi sprostitev sedeža zadevnega poslanca.
This means that Parliament has a legal obligation to take note immediately of the existence of any of the grounds for incompatibility laid down in Article 7 of the Act and then establish that the seat of the Member concerned is vacant.
Način za preverjanje nezdružljivosti na evropski ravni je, v skladu z določbami samega Akta, prav postopek preverjanja veljavnosti mandatov.
Under the provisions of the Act, however, incompatibilities at European level have to be examined during the verification of credentials procedure which, under the Rules of Procedure, only begins well after the opening of Parliament's term of office and, for reasons connected with the organisation of the work of the committee concerned, may last for several months.
Ta se, v skladu z določili Poslovnika, sicer začne veliko časa po datumu začetka parlamentarne mandatne dobe in, zaradi samega razvoja dejavnosti znotraj odbora, traja nekaj mesecev.
The provisions of the Rules of Procedure concerning this issue therefore need to be re-examined.
Predlogi sprememb Poslovnika
Proposed changes to the rules
Kot je bilo izpostavljeno zgoraj, bi bilo treba posodobiti sedanja določila Poslovnika in upoštevati nove predpise Akta o volitvah (zlasti v zvezi z nezdružljivostjo).
As explained above, the current provisions of the Rules of Procedure need to be updated to bring them into line with the new provisions of the 1976 Act (particularly as regards incompatibilities).
Nekaj posebnih primerov, ki so se zgodili v obdobju prehajanja med dvema parlamentarnima obdobjema, je namreč razkrilo relevantne pomanjkljivosti v predpisih.
In fact, some of the cases which have arisen during the transition from one Parliament to the next have revealed serious legal loopholes: