natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4. pozdravlja predlog Komisije za spodbujanje letnega foruma za vključevanje, ki bo olajšal izmenjavo najboljših praks, predvsem v politiki, kjer igra EU omejeno vlogo, ampak kjer nekatere države članice vodijo politike, ki so lahko vodilo drugim; meni, da bi morali predstavniki vseh oblasti, bodisi lokalne, regionalne nacionalne ali oblasti EU, ki so vpletene v vključevanje, sodelovati v letnem forumu za vključevanje;
Welcomes the Commission's proposal to promote an annual Integration Forum to facilitate the exchange of best practice, especially in policies where the EU has a limited role to play but where some Member States operate policies which could offer guidance to others; considers that this Forum should seek the participation of representatives from all the authorities involved in integration, being local, regional, national, or EU authorities, as well as of immigrants themselves;
6. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija priznala potrebo po raziskovanju in opredelitvi politik vključevanja držav članic in ravni sodelovanja priseljencev; meni, da je ta podatek predpogoj za vsako politiko EU, katere namen je spodbujati boljše vključevanje v EU, in da je zato, da je taka opredelitev uporabna, treba pojasniti izraze, uporabljene v razpravi EU o vključevanju, saj je že sama beseda "vključevanje" predmet različnih razlag;
Welcomes the Commission’s recognition of the need for research into and a mapping exercise of Member States’ integration policies and levels of participation of immigrants; considers that this information is a pre-requisite for any EU policy aimed at fostering better integration in the EU and that for such a mapping exercise to be of use, the terms of the EU debate on integration need to be clarified, given that the word 'integration' itself is open to many different interpretations;
9. poziva Komisijo, da vzpostavi strog spremljevalni mehanizem za ocenjevanje programov vključevanja v različnih državah članicah, vključno s sodelovanjem neodvisnih strokovnjakov, in objavi strogo in praktično poročilo o migraciji in vključevanju; tako poziva Komisijo, da poročilo preoblikuje v dvoletno poročilo, ki:
Calls on the Commission to establish rigorous monitoring mechanisms for the evaluation of integration programmes in the Member States, including through the use of independent experts, and to launch a rigorous and practical report on migration and integration; as such, urges the Commission to recast the Report as a biannual report that:
- se osredotoča na stroge kazalnike, ki merijo rezultate držav članic glede skupnih osnovnih načel vključevanja,
- focuses on rigorous indices that measure Member State performance with respect to the CBPs on integration,
- določi kot obvezujoče natančno in popolno sporočanje podatkov s strani držav članice; ob pomanjkanju takih podatkov je treba razviti druga sredstva za zbiranje podatkov, ki bodo skladna s kazalniki iz poročila,
- makes Member State reporting of accurate and complete data obligatory; in the absence of such data, alternative means of gathering data consistent with the Report’s indices should be developed,
- poveča vlogo nacionalnih kontaktnih točk in njihovo sodelovanje z neodvisnimi strokovnjaki,
- enhances the role of national contact points and their cooperation with independent experts,
- se zgleduje po poročilu ZN o človekovem razvoju in evropskem indeksu vključevanja,
- looks to the UNDP Human Development Report and the European Inclusion Index as models,
- se objavi na letni seji EU ministrov za vključevanje;
- is released at the annual meeting of EU integration ministers;
12. poziva Komisijo in države članice, da uporabijo velik potencial delegacij Komisije in konzularnih organov po vsem svetu za pomoč pri vključevanju morebitnih priseljencev tako, da se jih seznani s kulturo, zgodovino, jezikom in državljanskimi pravicami in odgovornostmi Evropske unije in držav članic;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to utilise the broad potential of Commission delegations and consular authorities throughout the world to assist in integrating potential immigrants through familiarising them with EU and Member State culture, history, language and civic rights and responsibilities;
17. poziva Svet, da ponovno obravnava predlog Komisije za uporabo odprte metode za usklajevanje politike vključevanja; v zvezi s tem poziva Evropski parlament, da sodeluje v celotnem postopku;
Urges the Council to reconsider the Commission proposal to apply the open method of coordination to integration policy; in this respect, calls for the involvement of Parliament in the whole procedure;
19. spodbuja države članice, da odgovornost za nadzor politike vključevanja priseljencev dodelijo enemu ministru, ter s tem zagotovijo, da se ta politika upošteva v agencijah na vseh vladnih ravneh, ter da razmislijo o imenovanju visokega komisarja za vključevanje ali varuha človekovih pravic za vključevanje v vsaki državi, da usklajuje izvajanje politik, razširja informacije migrantom in obravnava pritožbe migrantov ter ukrepa za odpravo težav;
Encourages Member States to assign responsibility to a single cabinet minister to monitor immigrant integration policies, to ensure that policies are mainstreamed throughout agencies at all levels of government and to consider the appointment of a High Commissioner on Integration or an Integration Ombudsman in each Member State to coordinate implementation of policies, disseminate information to migrants, review migrant complaints and take action to correct problems;
23. poziva države članice, da oblikujejo pregledne, človeške, hitre in razumne postopke za dodelitev statusa rezidenta za daljši čas, za ponovno združitev družin ter za naturalizacijo priseljencev, ki so rezidenti za daljši čas, in njihovih otrok, zlasti ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je veliko teh otrok rojenih na ozemlju države članice;
Calls on Member States to establish transparent, humane, fast and reasonable procedures for the granting of long-term resident status, for family reunification and for the naturalization of long-term resident immigrants and their children, taking into account especially the fact that many of those children are born in the territory of a Member State;
28. poziva države članice, predvsem da se prepreči morebitno slabo ravnanje s priseljenkami, da jim priskrbijo lahko dostopne podatke, ki zadevajo zakonodajo države gostiteljice o enakosti med spoloma in pravicah ter zaščiti, ki iz nje izhajajo, vključno s pravnimi in upravnimi ukrepi, ki so na razpolago;
Calls on Member States, in order especially to prevent the potential maltreatment of immigrant women, to provide them with easily accessible information as regards the legislation of the host country on gender equality and the rights and protection that derive from that legislation, including the available legal and administrative remedies;
30. poziva države članice, da predvidijo ukrepe za vključevanje beguncev v sprejemni fazi, kot so jezikovni tečaji ali prostovoljne delovne dejavnosti, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se postopek vključevanja beguncev prične v njihovi sprejemni fazi;
Encourages Member States to make provision for integration-related measures for refugees during the reception phase, such as language courses or voluntary work activities, taking into consideration the fact that the integration process for refugees starts during the reception phase;
Mora EU sprejeti več priseljencev in če, koliko?
Should the EU welcome more immigrants—and, if so, how many?
Ta vprašanja so upravičeno glavna tema stalnih javnih razprav v mnogih državah članicah.
These questions are rightly the focus of sustained public debate in many Member States.
Nedavne raziskave kažejo, da stalno priseljevanje, če se pametno upravlja, prinaša precejšnje gospodarske in socialne prednosti.
The most recent research shows that continued immigration, managed wisely, creates substantial economic and social benefits.
Vseeno je priseljevanje za mnoge vse bolj tudi vir zaskrbljenosti in negotovosti.
Yet, for many, immigration is increasingly also a source of anxiety and insecurity.
V nasprotju je vprašanje, ali bi morali vključiti priseljence, ki že živijo in delajo pri nas, ter ne ovirajo našega življenja, ampak ga izboljšujejo, samoumevno.
By contrast, the question of whether we should integrate immigrants who already live and work amongst us—causing no harm and enhancing our lives—is self-evident.
Postati morajo polnopravni člani evropske družbe in na koncu dobiti državljanstvo.
They must become full members of European society, ultimately attaining citizenship.
Če se kaj od tega ne bi uresničilo, bi to pomenilo, da Unija uveljavlja dvotirno družbo, pojem, ki krši naše temeljne vrednote.
Anything short of this would imply that the Union sanctions a two-tier society, a notion that offends our core values.
To poročilo temelji na prepričanju, da je vključevanje vprašanje, ki je enako pomembno kot uspešna širitev EU ali svetovno gibanje za pravice žensk.
This Report is animated by the conviction that integration is an issue tantamount in importance to the successful enlargement of the EU or the global movement for women’s rights.
V zvezi s tem izzivom je bilo delovanje Unije zelo brezbrižno.
In the face of such a challenge, the Union’s commitment has been largely neglectful.
Evropske družbe se, namesto da bi priseljence učinkovito vključevale v šole, na delovna mesta in v politične sisteme, z več vidikov vračajo v stanje „razkrajanja“.
Rather than incorporating immigrants effectively into schools, workplaces, and political systems, European societies are in many respects slipping into a state of 'disintegration'.
Vseeno je Unija za premagovanje izziva vključevanja, katerega neuspeh bi lahko socialno, gospodarsko in politično ogrozil EU, dodelila zelo malo sredstev.
Yet in trying to overcome this integration challenge—the failure of which could undermine the EU socially, economically, and politically—the Union has committed precious few resources.
Čeprav je Evropski svet v Tampereju leta 1999 jasno izrazil svojo obveznost vključevanja priseljencev in v Solunu leta 2003 ponovno poudaril to prepričanje, pričakovanja dejansko niso bila izpolnjena.
Although the European Council firmly stated its commitment to immigrant integration at Tampere in 1999, and reinforced its conviction in Thessaloniki in 2003, reality has not kept pace with expectations.
Čeprav je neuspešno vključevanje vzrok za številne težave, bo uspeh okrepil EU na temeljnih področjih: naši skupni dosežki pri vključevanju bodo okrepili gospodarstvo Unije glede na globalno konkurenco, pritegnili bodo delavce in podjetnike, ki jih potrebujejo naša gospodarstva, ter znanstvenike in študente, ki so temelj za sposobnost inovativnosti, naša mesta bodo varnejša, skupnosti pa močnejše.
If failure of integration is the father of countless problems, success will strengthen the EU in critical ways: Our common achievements in integration will fortify the Union’s economy in the face of global competition; it will attract the workers and entrepreneurs our economies need, as well as the scientists and students who are the bedrock of our ability to innovate; our cities will be safer, our communities stronger.
Prednosti vključevanja imajo višji domet od rasti BDP, krepitve pokojninskih sistemov in zmanjšanja nemirov.
The benefits of integration range even further than GDP growth, stronger pension systems, and diminished unrest.
Evropski priseljenci so lahko most, ki povezuje Unijo in globaliziran svet, saj prispevajo k izboljšanju trgovinskih obetov, krepitvi socialnih omrežij in potrjevanju položaja Unije kot globalne vodilne sile, sposobne premagovanja kulturnih in verskih razlik.
Europe’s immigrants can serve as the Union’s bridge to a globalising world—enhancing our trade prospects, thickening social networks, and confirming the Union’s position as a global leader capable of overcoming cultural and religious divides.
Z izzivom vključevanja priseljencev smo se srečevali že prej.
The challenge of immigrant integration is one to which we have risen before.
Evropska unija se je najbrž v zgodovini najuspešneje lotila vključevanja priseljencev.
In fact, the European Union is arguably the most successful enterprise of immigrant integration in history.
Pred četrt stoletja je bila večina priseljencev, ki so živeli v takratni Evropski skupnosti, iz Južne Evrope.
A quarter-century ago, most immigrants living in the then European Community were southern Europeans.
Danes je Južna Evropa uspešen del Unije, njeni državljani pa ne štejejo več za priseljence, čeprav so jih včasih mnogi imeli za tuje in „nesposobne vključevanja“.
Today, southern Europe is a thriving part of the Union, its citizens no longer perceived as immigrants—though at the time, many considered them alien and 'unintegratable'.
Njihov pristop k Uniji je okrepil EU kot celoto.
Their accession to the Union strengthened the EU as a whole.
Tudi Vzhodnoevropejci so zdaj polnopravni člani EU.
Likewise, eastern Europeans are now full EU members.
Priseljenci iz zadnjih petdeset let pa so imeli prednost pred današnjimi: prihajali so predvsem iz držav, ki so si obetale skorajšnjega članstva v Uniji.
But the immigrants of the past 50 years held an advantage over their counterparts today: They hailed mostly from countries with imminent prospects for Union membership.
Zato je morda koristno, da o teh več kot 40 milijonih državljanov, rojenih zunaj EU, razmišljamo kot o 26. državi članici EU (in peti največji).
Perhaps it is useful to therefore think of these over 40 million foreign-born nationals as the EU’s 26 th Member State (and its fifth largest).
Potem se lahko vprašamo: ali so naša prizadevanja za vključevanje tega prebivalstva primerljiva z našimi obveznostmi vključevanja držav pristopnic?
We could then ask: How do our efforts to integrate this population compare to the commitments we make to integrate accession countries?
Za uspešno vključevanje je potrebno obsežno zagotavljanje človeških in finančnih virov.
Successful integration requires a serious commitment of human and financial resources.
Unijo in svet je treba tudi spodbuditi k praksam, ki lahko znatno povečajo uspeh pri vključevanju priseljencev.
We also need to scour the Union and the world for practices that can dramatically increase our success rate with immigrant integration.
Povečati moramo tudi sredstva za učinkovito širjenje takih idej.
And we must multiply the means for effectively disseminating such ideas.
Nazadnje je morda najpomembnejše vprašanje v zvezi z vključevanjem priseljencev tisto, o katerem se najmanj razpravlja: v kakšno družbo želimo vključiti ljudi?
Finally, perhaps the most important issue related to immigrant integration is the one that is least discussed: Into what kind of society do we want people to integrate?
Najpomembnejši razlog za vključevanje evropskih priseljencev je, da bomo z nevključevanjem opustili vrednote in načela, na katerih temelji Unija.
The most essential reason for integrating Europe’s immigrants is that, by failing to do so, we will betray the ideals and principles on which the Union is based.
Naš odziv na priseljence prevečkrat izraža našo ozko, vase usmerjeno, pristransko in nazadnjaško miselnost.
Too often, our reaction to immigrants defines us as closed-minded, inward-looking, biased, and reactionary.
Te lastnosti posledično privzamejo tudi naše družbe.
By extension our societies adopt these characteristics as well.
Vključevanje ne more obstajati brez tistih, ki vključujejo, in tistih, ki so vključeni.
There can be no integration without those who integrate and those who are integrated.
To pomeni, da vključevanje migrantov predpostavlja našo pripravljenost za sprejem in vključevanje migrantov.
This means that the integration of migrants presupposes our willingness to accept and integrate migrants.
Naše politike morajo postopke naseljevanja voditi tako, da vplivajo ne le na ravnanje priseljencev ampak tudi družb, ki jih sprejemajo, ter da na vseh straneh zbirajo sredstva za uspešno izvajanje politik.
Our policies, therefore, must manage the processes of settlement by influencing the behaviour of both immigrants and receiving societies, and by mobilising resources on all sides in order to effectively implement policies.
Utemeljitev sodelovanja EU pri vključevanju
The Rationale for EU Involvement in Integration
Zakaj mora EU sodelovati pri vključevanju priseljencev?
Why should the EU be involved in immigrant integration?
Ker ima lahko neuspešno izvajanje politike vključevanja posamezne države članice negativne posledice za Unijo kot celoto.
Because the failure by a single Member State to implement successful integration policies can have adverse consequences for the Union as a whole.
· Velika brezposelnost priseljencev ne slabi le posameznih gospodarstev, ampak tudi gospodarstvo celotne Unije.
· The underemployment of immigrants weakens not only individual economies, but that of the entire Union.
· Visoko in nizko kvalificirani delavci, ki jih potrebujejo naša gospodarstva, lahko, če se jim zdi Evropa negostoljubna, ostanejo prepuščeni sivi ekonomiji ali evropskim gospodarskim tekmecem.
· High- and low-skilled workers that our economies need, if they perceive Europe as inhospitable, can be driven into the underground economy or into the arms of Europe’s economic competitors.
· Odsotnost učinkovitih politik vključevanja lahko povzroči negativne občutke in stereotipe v zvezi s priseljenci, posledično pa defenzivno politiko priseljevanja.
· The absence of effective integration policies can lead to negative perceptions and stereotypes against immigrants, and consequently to defensive immigration policies;
· Strah državljanov lahko ogrozi spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva, svobodo, demokracijo, enakost, pravno državo in spoštovanje človekovih pravic, vključno s pravicami oseb, ki pripadajo manjšinam.
· Fear among citizens can subvert respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities;
· Skrajne oblike odtujenosti lahko porodijo radikalizacijo, ki lahko ogrozi splošni občutek varnosti državljanov EU.
· In its more extreme forms, alienation could breed radicalization that can threatens the EU’s collective sense of security;
· Negativni stereotipi o nevključenih priseljencih lahko ogrozijo uspešno širitev Unije.
· Negative stereotypes against un-integrated immigrants can undermine the Union’s successful enlargement.
Kljub zgornjim navedbam temu je bila Unija dolgo ohromljena zaradi splošno razširjene ideje, da je „vključevanje lokalno“.
In the face of the above, the Union has nevertheless long been paralysed by the widely circulated idea that 'integration is local'.
Pobude za vključevanje se tudi v resnici izvajajo lokalno.
Integration initiatives are indeed implanted locally.
Lokalne šole, zveze, podjetja, cerkve in druge ustanove opravljajo težko nalogo povezovanja priseljencev in domačinov za izgradnjo skupnosti in izboljšanje življenja.
A neighbourhood’s schools, unions, businesses, places of worship, and other institutions do the hard work of bringing newcomers and natives together in ways that build communities and improve lives.
Posledice vključevanja so v vsakem primeru globalne – zlasti če je neuspešno.
But integration is global in its implications—especially when it fails.
Medtem ko morajo lokalni, regionalni in nacionalni organi določiti natančne ukrepe vključevanja, morajo države članice izvajati učinkovite strategije vključevanja, katerih rezultati koristijo splošnim interesom Unije.
Thus, while local, regional, and national authorities should determine the precise integration measures implemented, Member States must pursue effective integration strategies whose outcomes advance the Union’s common interests.
Prav pri spremljanju teh rezultatov pa so lahko institucije EU precej bolj dejavnejše oziroma morajo take postati, zlasti pa bolj učinkovite.
It is in monitoring these outcomes where EU institutions can and must become far more active and—particularly—effective.
Pretekli in prihodnji ukrepi – priporočila poročevalca
Past and Future Action – The Rapporteur’s Recommendations
Prejšnja predsedstva EU in Evropska komisija so opravili pomembno delo na področju izboljšanja politike vključevanja.
Previous EU Presidencies and the European Commission have done much admirable work in advancing integration policy.
Vseeno so bila skupna prizadevanja EU na ravni izvajanja zelo neustrezna – tudi na zelo omejenem področju, za katerega je odgovorna Komisija.
However, the EU’s collective efforts have been notably inadequate at the level of implementation—even in the very limited area in which the Commission has authority to act.
To dejstvo poudarjata dva primera: Evropski center za spremljanje migracij, ki so ga glasno napovedovali leta 2003, ni bil ustanovljen.
Two examples underscore this point: The European Migration Observatory, heralded with fanfare in 2003, has never been created.
Uvodna izdaja letnega poročila o priseljevanju in vključevanju, ki ga Evropski svet vsako leto zahteva od Komisije, je pravočasno izšla leta 2004
And the inaugural edition of the Annual Report on Migration and Integration—which the European Council tasked the Commission with producing every year—came out on time in June 2004
KOM(2004)0508 . , druga izdaja pa vsaj do aprila 2006 še ni izšla.
COM(2004)0508 . but, as of April 2006, the second edition has yet to appear.
Leta 2006 in v letih, ki bodo sledila, bodo imele Evropska komisija in druge evropske institucije izjemno veliko priložnosti vplivanja na vključevanje priseljencev.
In 2006 and beyond, the European Commission and other European institutions will have an exceptional series of opportunities to influence immigrant integration.
Te je treba kar najbolj izkoristiti in spodbuditi.
These must be seized and leveraged for optimal effect.
Vseeno je pomembno, da se pred lotevanjem novih poslov, ki zmanjšujejo pozornost in sredstva Unije, zagotovi učinkovito izvajanje obstoječih direktiv v zvezi z vključevanjem priseljencev.
However, before embarking on new ventures that drain the Union’s attention and resources, it is critical to ensure the effective implementation of existing Directives that affect immigrant integration.
Dolžnost Komisije je, da strožje spremlja prenos direktiv v zvezi z vključevanjem in učinkovitost upravnih praks, s katerimi se izvaja ustrezna zakonodaja v vsakodnevnem življenju priseljencev.
It is incumbent upon the Commission to far more rigorously monitor both the transposition of integration-related Directives, as well as the effectiveness of administrative practices that implement the relevant legislation in the day-to-day lives of immigrants.
Morda je najpomembnejša pobuda na novo ustanovljen Evropski sklad za vključevanje državljanov tretjih držav.
Perhaps the most significant among new initiatives is the newly conceived European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals.
To poročilo predlaga, da Komisija upošteva šest načel za dodelitev sredstev iz novega sklada EU za vključevanje:
This Report suggests that the Commission should follow six principles for allocating the new EU Integration Fund:
Ena letna točka mora opredeliti izplačila; področja letnih ciljno usmerjenih naložb morajo vključevati zmanjševanje vrzeli v zaposlovanju med domačini in priseljenci; izboljšanje uspeha priseljencev v izobraževanju; izboljšanje možnosti izobraževanja in zaposlovanja žensk; jezikovni in uvajalni programi; ter okrepitev političnega sodelovanja priseljencev;
A single annual focal point should define disbursements; annual target investment areas should include reducing the employment gap between natives and immigrants; improving immigrant performance in education; advancing the education and employment prospects of women; language and introductory programmes; and enhancing political participation of immigrants;
Komisija mora vsako leto nameniti primeren in določen odstotek sredstev sklada za podporo ocenam neodvisnih strokovnjakov o učinkovitosti programov, ki jih financira Komisija;
c. the Commission should dedicate a reasonable and defined percentage of the Fund’s resources each year to underwrite evaluations by independent experts of the effectiveness of the programmes financed by the Commission;