natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(1) Komisija redno ocenjuje ukrepe in programe, financirane v okviru te uredbe, da bi ugotovila, ali so cilji izpolnjeni, ter da bi lahko oblikovala priporočila z namenom izboljšanja prihodnjih dejavnosti.
The Commission shall regularly evaluate the actions and programmes financed under this Regulation in order to ascertain whether the objectives have been met and enable it to formulate recommendations with a view to improving future operations.
Komisija redno ocenjuje ukrepe in programe, financirane v okviru te uredbe, da bi ugotovila, ali so stopnja doseganja prvotno določenih ciljev, stroškovna učinkovitost ukrepov, ki jih financira Skupnost, in njihov učinek zadovoljivi.
The Commission shall regularly evaluate the actions and programmes financed under this Regulation in order to ascertain whether the degree of achievement of the objectives originally set out, the cost-effectiveness of the measures financed by the Community and their impact have been satisfactory.
Na podlagi tega Komisija oblikuje priporočila z namenom izboljšanja prihodnjih dejavnosti.
On this basis, the Commission shall formulate recommendations with a view to improving future operations.
Komisija mora za izboljšanje svojih prihodnjih dejavnosti oceniti ne le ali so bili cilji izpolnjeni, ampak tudi v kakšnem obsegu so bili izpolnjeni in ali je bilo to stroškovno učinkovito.
In order to improve future operations, the Commission must evaluate not only whether the objectives have been met, but to what extend they have been met and whether the operation has been cost-effective.
Člen 12, odstavek 1a (novo)
Article 12, paragraph 1a (new)
(1a) Kadar je to primerno ali na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta se poročila o oceni opravijo z neodvisnimi zunanjimi ocenami.
(1a) The evaluation reports shall be carried out by means of independent external evaluations where appropriate or at the request of the European Parliament or the Council.
Pravnemu besedilu je treba dodati to pomembno opozorilo, vključeno na primer v instrument za razvojno in gospodarsko sodelovanje/instrument za razvojno sodelovanje (DCECI/DCI).
This important caveat, included in DCECI/DCI for instance, should be added to the legal text.
Člen 12, odstavek 2a (novo)
Article 12, paragraph 2a (new)
(2a) Komisija na stopnji ocenjevanja sodelovanja Skupnosti iz te uredbe poveže vse zadevne interesne skupine, vključno z nedržavnimi akterji.
(2a) The Commission shall associate all relevant stakeholders, including non-State actors, in the evaluation phase of the Community cooperation provided for under this Regulation.
Člen 12, odstavek 2b (novo)
Article 12, paragraph 2b (new)
(2b) Omejen delež letnega proračuna se uporabi za financiranje ocenjevalnih študij o ukrepih in programih v okviru te uredbe.
(2b) A limited proportion of the annual budget shall be used to finance evaluation studies of the actions and programmes undertaken in the framework of this Regulation.
Komisija pregleda napredek, dosežen pri izvajanju ukrepov, sprejetih na podlagi te uredbe, ter Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsaki dve leti predloži poročilo o izvajanju te uredbe.
The Commission shall examine the progress made on implementing the measures taken under this Regulation and shall submit every two years to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the implementation of this Regulation.
Poročilo navede rezultate izvajanja proračuna ter predstavi financirane ukrepe in programe.
The report shall set out the results of implementation of the budget and present the actions and programmes financed.
Komisija pregleda napredek, dosežen pri izvajanju ukrepov, sprejetih na podlagi te uredbe, ter Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsaki dve leti predloži podrobno poročilo o izvajanju te uredbe.
The Commission shall examine the progress made on implementing the measures taken under this Regulation and shall submit every two years to the European Parliament and the Council a detailed report on the implementation of this Regulation.
Poročilo navede rezultate izvajanja proračuna ter predstavi vse financirane ukrepe in programe ter čim bolj določi glavne rezultate in vplive ukrepov in programov sodelovanja .
The report shall set out the results of implementation of the budget and present all the actions and programmes financed and, as far as possible, set out the main outcomes and impacts of the cooperation actions and programmes.
Poročila morajo biti v prihodnje podrobnejša ter vsebovati navedbo glavnih rezultatov in vplivov programov in ukrepov sodelovanja.
In the future reports should be more detailed and should contain a reference to the main outcomes and impacts of the cooperation actions and programmes.
Komisija redno obvešča Evropski parlament o posvetovanjih v okviru tega odbora ter mu pošilja pomembne dokumente, vključno z dnevnimi redi, osnutki ukrepov in povzetki sestankov.
The Commission shall regularly inform the European Parliament of the Committee proceedings and provide the relevant documents including agenda, draft measures and summary records of the meetings.
Komisija redno obvešča Evropski parlament o posvetovanjih v okviru tega odbora ter mu pošilja pomembne dokumente, vključno z dnevnimi redi, osnutki ukrepov in podrobnimi povzetki sestankov.
The Commission shall regularly inform the European Parliament of the Committee proceedings and provide the relevant documents including agenda, draft measures and detailed summary records of the meetings.
Evropski parlament mora biti primerno obveščen.
The European Parliament must be properly informed.
Višino financiranja Skupnosti, ki je potrebna za izvajanje ukrepov iz te uredbe, proračunski organ določi na letni osnovi v okviru finančne perspektive .
The amount of Community funding deemed necessary for the implementation of the actions identified in this Regulation will be established by the budget authority on an annual basis within the limits of the financial perspectives .
Referenčni finančni znesek za izvajanje te uredbe za obdobje od leta 2007 do 2013 je 172 milijonov EUR.
The financial reference amount for the implementation of this Regulation for the period from 2007 to 2013 shall be EUR 172 million.
Letno višino financiranja Skupnosti, ki je potrebna za izvajanje ukrepov iz te uredbe, proračunski organ določi na letni osnovi v mejah finančnega okvira .
The annual amount of Community funding deemed necessary for the implementation of the actions identified in this Regulation will be established by the budget authority on an annual basis within the limits of the financial framework .
Ta predlog spremembe vključuje referenčni finančni znesek za ta instrument, vključen v sporazum o finančnem okviru 2007–2013.
This amendment includes the financial reference amount for this instrument included in the agreement on the Financial Framework 2007-2013.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu do 31. decembra 2010 predloži poročilo o oceni izvajanja te uredbe v prvih treh letih, po potrebi z zakonodajnim predlogom, ki uvaja potrebne spremembe.
By 31 December 2010, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report evaluating the implementation of this Regulation in the first three yearswith, if appropriate, a legislative proposal introducing the necessary modifications.
Ni razloga, da bi pozabili na „revizijsko klavzulo“, vključeno v druge instrumente za zunanjo pomoč, zlasti glede na znatne spremembe, ki jih uvaja ta novi predlog.
There is no reason to forget the "review clause" as included and agreed in the other instruments for external assistance, particularly given the substantial changes introduced.
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino (INTA) je kot odbor, odgovoren za „finančne, gospodarske in trgovinske odnose s tretjimi državami“ (to so države v razvoju in države, ki niso v razvoju) , sodeloval pri parlamentarnem nadzoru 4 novih finančnih instrumentov.
As the Committee responsible for "financial, economic and trade relations with third countries" (i.e. both developing and non-developing countries) , the Committee on International Trade (INTA) has been involved in the parliamentary scrutiny of the 4 new financial instruments.
Odbor INTA je zlasti zanimal predlog uredbe o vzpostavitvi finančnega instrumenta za razvojno in gospodarsko sodelovanje (DCECI), največjega med novimi instrumenti za zunanjo pomoč glede na financiranje in področje uporabe, in na splošno vprašanja, povezana z „gospodarskim sodelovanjem“.
INTA had a particular interest in the proposal for a regulation establishing a financing instrument for development and economic cooperation (DCECI), the largest of the new external aid instruments in funding and scope, as well as on "economic co-operation" related issues at large.
DCECI je bil najprej predložen Odboru za razvoj (DEVE) kot glavnemu odboru in odboru INTA za mnenje z okrepljenim sodelovanjem.
The DCECI was originally referred to the Committee on Development (DEVE) as lead committee and to the INTA for opinion with enhanced co-operation.
Marca 2005 je odbor DEVE ta predlog soglasno zavrnil s podporo treh soglasnih mnenj, vključno s prvim mnenjem odbora INTA
In March 2005, this proposal was rejected by a unanimous vote in DEVE, supported by three unanimous opinions, including INTA's first opinion
PE 355.037v02-00, 13.3.2006. .
PE 355.337v02-00 of 13.3.2006. .
Takrat je moral poročevalec skleniti, da je predlog nesprejemljiv, predvsem zaradi znatne erozije pristojnosti Parlamenta.
At that time, your rapporteur was forced to conclude that the proposal was unacceptable mainly because of the substantial erosion of the powers of Parliament.
Po prvi zavrnitvi v odboru so potekala pogajanja in tristranska srečanja (Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija), da bi na njih razpravljali o reformi instrumentov.
After the first rejection in committee, negotiations and trilateral meetings (European Parliament, Council and Commission) were held in order to discuss the reform of the instruments.
Decembra 2005 je odbor DEVE odločil, da je napredek za pogajalsko mizo, dovolj velik za zahtevo, da se poročilo vrne odboru v pregled po običajnem poteku postopka soodločanja.
In December 2005, DEVE judged that progress at the negotiation table was sufficient to request that the report be referred back to committee for examination within the normal course of the co-decision procedure.
Poročevalec je nato predstavil drugi osnutek mnenja, ki ga je potem odbor INTA sprejel
Your rapporteur presented then its second draft opinion which was subsequently adopted by INTA
PE 360.000v03-00, 21.3.2006. .
PE 360.000v03-00 of 21.3.2006. .
V nasprotju s stališčem Odbora za razvoj je poročevalec trdil, da je treba gospodarsko in razvojno sodelovanje ohraniti v eni uredbi, kot je to predlagala Komisija.
Contrary to the position of the Development Committee, your rapporteur argued that both economic co-operation and development co-operation should be maintained, as proposed by the Commission, in one and the same regulation.
Glasovanje v odboru INTA je podprlo to načelo „dve poglavji – en instrument“.
The vote in INTA upheld this logic of the "two chapters - one instrument".
Združitev gospodarskega in razvojnega sodelovanja v en instrument, sprejet s postopkom soodločanja, bi Parlamentu omogočila, da lahko soodloča o gospodarskem sodelovanju, kot je to zahteval Parlament in kot je bilo predvideno v Ustavni pogodbi.
Placing economic co-operation and development co-operation under one co-decided instrument would have allowed Parliament to gain co-decision on economic co-operation, as had been requested by Parliament and was provided for in the Constitutional treaty.
Kljub mnenju odbora INTA se je Evropski parlament na medinstitucionalnih pogajanjih strinjal s Svetom o razdelitvi DCECI na dva različna in ločena instrumenta: enega za sodelovanje z državami v razvoju in drugega za sodelovanje z industrializiranimi (razvitimi) državami, kar je predmet sedanjega poročila, za katerega je odbor INTA glavni odbor.
Despite INTA's opinion, in the course of the inter-institutional negotiations, the European Parliament agreed with Council to the separation of the DCECI in two distinct and separate instruments: one for cooperation with developing countries and one for cooperation with industrialised (developed) countries, which is the subject of the current report for which INTA is the lead committee.
Novi predlog: glavne spremembe
The new proposal: Main Changes
Predlog nove uredbe Sveta (na podlagi osnutka besedila Komisije) nadomešča Uredbo Sveta 382/2001, ki preneha veljati 31. decembra 2007.
The Council proposal (based on the Commission's draft text) for a new regulation, replaces Council Regulation 382/2001 which is due to expire on 31 December 2007.
Večinoma je v skladu s sporočilom Komisije o tematskem programu o sodelovanju z industrializiranimi državami in drugimi državami z visokim dohodkom v okviru prihodnje finančne perspektive (2007–2013), objavljenim januarja.
It is largely in line with the Commission Communication on the Thematic Programme on Cooperation with Industrialised and other High-income Countries under the future Financial Perspectives (2007-2013), released in January.
Novi predlog uvaja več znatnih sprememb, po katerih se razlikuje od obstoječe uredbe.
The new proposal introduces a number of substantial changes that distinguish it from the existing regulation.
Sprememba pravne podlage
Change of Legal Base
Najprej je spremenjena pravna podlaga: člen 133 iz stare uredbe nadomešča novi člen 181a (uveden s Pogodbo iz Nice), ki izrecno zajema gospodarsko, finančno in tehnično sodelovanje s tretjimi državami.
There is, firstly, a change in the legal base: from Article 133 in the old regulation to the new Article 181a (introduced by the Treaty of Nice) which specifically covers economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries.
Širša geografska pokritost
Broader Geographical Coverage
Ena od pomembnejših sprememb v predlagani uredbi je razširitev geografske pokritosti s sedanjih 6 držav Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD) – ZDA, Kanade, Avstralije, Japonske, Nove Zelandije, Koreje – na bolj heterogeno skupino 17 držav, vključno z na novo industrializiranimi državami iz Azije – Singapurjem, Brunejem, Hongkongom, Tajpejem, Macaom – in državami Sveta za sodelovanje v Zalivu – Združenimi arabskimi emirati, Kuvajtom, Omanom in Bahrajnom.
One of the more notable changes in the proposed regulation is the extension of its geographical coverage from the current 6 OECD countries US, CAN, AUS, JAP, NZ, KOREA to a more heterogeneous group of 17 countries, including the NICs from Asia - Singapore, Brunei, Hong Kong, Taipei, Macao and the Gulf Cooperation Council countries - UAE, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain.
Izjemoma je predvideno tudi sodelovanje z dvema preostalima državama Sveta za sodelovanje v Zalivu (Saudsko Arabijo in Katarjem), ki ju Odbor za razvojno pomoč OECD še vedno uvršča med države v razvoju (države z višjim srednjim dohodkom), v okviru tega instrumenta.
It is also envisaged that, by way of exception, cooperation with the two remaining GCC countries (Saudi Arabia and Qatar) which are still listed by the OECD DAC as developing countries ("upper middle income" countries) will also be carried out under this instrument.
Diverzifikacija dejavnosti in ciljev
Diversification of Activities and Objectives
Utemeljitev instrumenta prehaja tudi od dvojnega načela (na podlagi a) razvoja projektov, katerih cilj je okrepitev dvostranskega sodelovanja z vsemi partnerskimi državami na številnih področjih, in b) spodbujanja trgovinskih odnosov s posebnim poudarkom na Japonski in Koreji) k enotnemu okviru za razširitev in poglobitev sodelovanja in obveznosti z vsemi partnerji.
The rationale of the instrument also moves from a dual logic (based on (a) the development of projects aimed at reinforcing bilateral cooperation with all the partner countries across a broad range of areas, and, b) the promotion of commercial relations with an exclusive focus on Japan and Korea) to a single framework for widening and deepening cooperation and engagement with all partners.
V skladu s prednostnimi nalogami za sodelovanje z industrializiranimi državami, navedenimi v sporočilu o tematskih programih, bo predlagana uredba financirala programe in projekte, ki izpolnjujejo naslednje glavne operativne cilje:
In line with the priorities for cooperation with Industrialised Countries indicated in the Communication on the thematic programmes, the proposed regulation will fund programmes and projects which meet the following main operational objectives:
Zaradi tega novega načela bi se lahko programi, ki se financirajo v okviru obstoječe uredbe, kot sta med drugim zelo uspešen program Executive Training Programme na Japonskem in v Koreji ter program EU Gateway to Japan, razširili na druge države.
As a result of the new logic, programmes funded under the existing regulation, such as, inter alia, the highly successful Executive Training Programme to Japan and Korea and the EU Gateway to Japan programme could be extended to other countries.
Hkrati želi poročevalec poudariti možnost razširitve obstoječe mreže centrov EU kot središč odličnosti na več držav, s čimer bi povečali prepoznavnost in profil Unije.
At the same time, your rapporteur wants to emphasize the possibility to expand the existing network of EU Centres to a broader range of countries as centres of excellence by which to raise the visibility and profile of the Union.
Diverzifikacija dejavnosti in zlasti razširitev geografske pokritosti sta priložnosti, vendar tudi velika izziva.
The diversification of activities, and, particularly, the extension of the geographical coverage, represent an opportunity but also a great challenge.
Nova uredba bo v nasprotju s sedanjo povezala zelo heterogeno skupino držav in sklop dejavnosti.
Unlike the current regulation, the new regulation will bring together a highly heterogeneous group of countries and set of activities.
Komisija bo zato morala dokazati, da bo spodbujanje različnih dvostranskih pobud za sodelovanje z zelo različnimi industrializiranimi državami in drugimi državami z visokim dohodkom v okviru enega instrumenta dejansko omogočilo, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 5 predloga, ekonomijo obsega, učinke sinergije, večjo učinkovitost in prepoznavnost ukrepov Skupnosti.
The Commission will therefore have to prove that the promotion of diversified bilateral cooperation initiatives with highly diverse industrialised and other high-income countries within a single instrument will indeed allow, as stated in the recital 5 of the proposal, economies of scale, synergy effects, greater effectiveness and visibility for the Community action.
Finančni okvir
Financial Envelope
Za prilagoditev večji geografski pokritosti in razširjenemu področju uporabe so proračunska sredstva, dodeljena temu instrumentu, znatno povečana (s 16 milijonov EUR na 22,2 milijona EUR na leto), kot je določeno v predhodnem predlogu proračuna in predlogu proračuna za leto 2007.
To accommodate the increased geographical coverage and extension of scope there is a substantive increase (from EUR 16m to 22.2m a year) in the budgetary resources committed to this instrument as provided for in the PDB and DB 2007.
Povečanje je razumno in ga je treba pozdraviti.
This increase is reasonable and to be welcome.
Na podlagi sedanjih in preteklih predvidenih izdatkov je približno 2/3 sredstev dodeljenih centrom EU, programu Executive Training Programme na Japonskem in v Koreji ter programu EU Gateway to Japan.
Under current and past projected expenditure approximately 2/3 of funds are allocated to the EU Centres, the ETP and the Gateway Programme.
Pričakuje se, da bo velika večina novih sredstev namenjena novim partnerskim državam.
It is to be expected that the great majority of the new funds will be directed to new partner countries.
Načrtovanje in potreba po nujni izvedbi študije o oceni potreb
Programming and the need for an urgent needs assessment study.
S prihodom novega instrumenta bo Komisija prvič uvedla neprave standardne prakse načrtovanja za to področje dejavnosti gospodarskega sodelovanja, ki so se pri prejšnjem instrumentu uporabljale bolj priložnostno.
With the advent of the new instrument, the Commission will introduce quasi-standard programming practices for the first time over this area of economic cooperation activities which were administered on a more ad hoc basis under the previous instrument.
Poročevalec pozdravlja ta razvoj, ker mora načrtovanje povzročiti preglednejše, uspešnejše in učinkovitejše projekte ter programe.
Your rapporteur welcomes this development as programming should translate into more transparent, effective and efficient projects and programmes.
Komisija mora čim prej obvestiti Parlament o številu in naravi večletnega(-ih) programa(-ov) sodelovanja, ki ga (jih) bo izbrala.
The Commission should inform the Parliament as soon as possible on the number and nature of the multiannual cooperation programme/s it will choose.
Pred načrtovanjem je treba glede na raznolikost in razširitev sodelovanja (zlasti gospodarskega sodelovanja) na več novih držav nujno izvesti obsežno študijo o oceni potreb zaradi obveščanja o stopnji načrtovanja in njenem vodenju, zlasti v zvezi z dejavnostmi v novih državah.
Before programming though, given the diversification and extension of the cooperation (particularly, economic cooperation) to a number of new countries, a comprehensive needs assessment study should be carried out as a matter of urgency in order to inform and guide the programming phase, particularly with regard to activities in the new countries.
Predlogi sprememb, ki jih je vložil poročevalec, se lahko povzamejo v 3 glavne naslove:
The amendments tabled by the rapporteur can be summarised along 3 main headlines:
prvič, za pojasnitev in poenostavitev priprave osnutka predloga, drugič, za uskladitev predloga z drugimi instrumenti za zunanjo finančno pomoč in tretjič, za izboljšanje nadzora Parlamenta nad tem instrumentom in sodelovanja pri načrtovanju.
First to clarify and simplify the drafting of the proposal; second, to bring the proposal in line with other external instruments for financial assistance; and third, to improve Parliament's scrutiny of this instrument and involvement in programming.
Poostritev in pojasnitev predloga
Tightening and clarifying the proposal
Številni predlogi sprememb so uvedeni zaradi večje jasnosti in boljše usklajenosti nekaterih vidikov besedila predloga.
A number of amendments are introduced in order to bring clarity and consistency to some aspects of the wording of the proposal.
Predvsem se poročevalcu zdi, da je pojem „strateškega interesa“ EU v pravnem besedilu problematičen.
Most notably, your rapporteur finds the notion of EU "strategic interest" problematic in a legal text.
Poročevalec se načeloma strinja s stališči Komisije o naravi tega instrumenta, ki mora za razliko od drugih instrumentov „pomoči“ izražati tudi potrebe in interese EU.
Your rapporteur agrees in principle with the Commission's views on the nature of this instrument which, unlike other "assistance" instruments, should also reflect the needs and interests of the EU.
Vendar je pojem „strateški“ interes po nepotrebnem političen ali celo geopolitičen.
However, the notion of "strategic" interests is unnecessarily political or even geopolitical.
Uskladitev ICI z drugimi zunanjimi instrumenti
Bringing ICI into line with other external instruments
Poročevalec je vključil več zelo pomembnih členov/klavzul/uvodnih izjav, ki so vključeni v druge instrumente za zunanjo pomoč:
Your rapporteur has included a number of highly relevant articles/clauses/recitals which are included in other instruments for external assistance:
Revizijska klavzula
Review Clause
Predlog je novost, ki vključuje nove države in dejavnosti.
This proposal is a new departure, involving new countries and activities.
Komisija sama morda želi predlagati prilagoditve za vmesni pregled.
The Commission itself may want to propose adjustments for the mid-term review.
Klavzula o človekovih pravicah/demokraciji
Human Rights/Democracy Clause