natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V tem obdobju sem napisal tudi številna poročila ter nekaj knjig o vrednotenju javnih sistemov in projektov.
During this period I also wrote a number of reports and a couple of books containing assessments of public systems and projects.
Njihova vsebina pokriva industrijsko politiko, vprašanja trga dela, regionalno politiko in ne nazadnje zunanjo pomoč.
These covered subjects such as industrial policy, labour market issues, regional policy and, not least, foreign aid.
Kot večina mojega dela na ministrstvu za finance je bilo tudi to podobno revidiranju poslovanja.
Like some of my work at the Ministry of Finance, much of this was similar to performance auditing.
Moja prva izobrazba iz ekonomije mi je zagotovila poglobljeno usposobljenost v računovodstvu in financah.
My first degree in economics provided substantial training in accounting and finance.
Od sredine 80-ih let sem bil član svetov nekaterih javnih organov, podjetij v državni lasti in ekonomske šole.
Since the mid-1980s I have been on the boards of some public authorities, state-owned companies and a school of economics.
Tudi tu sem pridobil pomembne izkušnje o javnih financah, upravljanju in reviziji upravljanja.
This has also provided important experience of public finance, management and management auditing.
Če ste že bili član Evropskega računskega sodišča ...
If you have already served as a Member of the European Court of Auditors…..
Odgovor ni potreben.
Not relevant.
Na predstavitvi pred Odborom za proračunski nadzor nameravam pokazati, da sem ustrezno usposobljen za člana Računskega sodišča.
My objective in the hearings before the Committee on Budgetary Control will be to show that I possess the required qualifications to become a Member of the Court of Auditors.
Če bo Parlament sprejel negativno mnenje o mojem imenovanju, bom resno razmislil o umiku svoje kandidature.
If Parliament were to arrive at an unfavourable opinion on my appointment, I would seriously consider withdrawing my candidacy.
Imenovanje Larsa Heikenstena za člana Računskega sodišča
Nomination of Lars Heikensten as a Member of the Court of Auditors
Člen 247(3), prvi pododstavek, ES in člen 160b (3) Pogodbe Euratom
Articles 247(3), first subparagraph, EC and 160b (3) Euratom
Pristojni odbor Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Committee responsible Date of referral
Poročevalec/-ka Datum imenovanja
Rapporteur Date appointed
o imenovanju Mortena Louisa Levysohna za člana Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Morten Louis Levysohn as a Member of the Court of Auditors
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS MORTENA LOUISA LEVYSOHNA..........................................4
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF MORTEN LOUIS LEVYSOHN................................4
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI MORTENA LOUISA LEVYSOHNA NA VPRAŠALNIK.............6
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF MORTEN LOUIS LEVYSOHN TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE........6
– ob upoštevanju člena 247(3) Pogodbe ES in člena 160 b (3) Pogodbe Euratom, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0340/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty, and Article 160b(3) of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0340/2005 ),
– ker je na seji 24. novembra 2005 Odbor za proračunski nadzor poslušal predstavitev kandidata Sveta za članstvo v Računskem sodišču in obravnaval strokovno usposobljenost glede na merila iz člena 247(2) Pogodbe ES in člena 160 b (2) Pogodbe Euratom,
– whereas at its meeting of 24 November 2005 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council's nominee for Membership of the Court of Auditors, and considered the nominee's qualifications in the light of the criteria laid down by Articles 247(2) of the EC Treaty and 160b(2) of the Euratom Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0370/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0370/2005 ),
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS MORTENA LOUISA LEVYSOHNA
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF MORTEN LOUIS LEVYSOHN
Osebni podatki:
Personal data:
Rojen: 31. marca 1949 v Københavnu.
Born March 31, 1949 in Copenhagen.
2 otroka, rojena leta 1975 in 1977.
2 children, born 1975 and 1977.
Diplomiral iz prava na Univerzi v Københavnu (1972).
Graduate of Law from the University of Copenhagen (1972).
Poklicna kariera:
Professional career:
Član Evropskega računskega sodišča.
Member of the European Court of Auditors.
Eden od članov poročevalcev Revizijske skupine IV, ki je odgovorna za revizijo lastnih sredstev, bančnih dejavnosti, odhodkov za poslovanje, institucije in organe EU.
One of the Member Rapporteurs of Audit Group IV, that is responsible for the audit of own resources, banking activities, administrative expenditure, EU institutions and bodies.
2005 je bil izvoljen za najvišjega člana (doajena) Skupine IV.
2005 elected Dean of Group IV.
Član skupine CEAD (2002–2005) in odbora za notranje revizije Sodišča (2003–2005).
Member of the CEAD group (2002-2005) and the Court's Internal Audit Committee (2003-2005).
Nadomestni član upravnega odbora Sodišča (2004–).
Substitute member of the Court's Administrative Committee (2004-).
Pomočnik generalnega revizorja danskega državnega urada za revizijo (NAOD).
Assistant Auditor General in the NAOD.
Od leta 1999 je tudi namestnik generalnega revizorja.
From 1999 Deputy Auditor General as well.
Do leta 1999 je bil pomočnik generalnega revizorja, odgovoren za celotno načrtovanje in upravljanje finančne revizije.
Until 1999, Assistant Auditor General responsible for the overall planning and management of the financial audit.
Od leta 2000 je bil zlasti odgovoren za finančno revizijo in revizije poslovanja Ministrstva za obrambo, Davčnega ministrstva ter Ministrstva za prehrano, kmetijstvo in ribolov, vključno z računovodskimi izkazi med Dansko in EU.
From 2000, in particular responsible for financial audit and performance audit examinations of the Ministries of Defence, Taxation and Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, including the accounts between the Danish State and EU.
Odgovoren za pregled in sodelovanje z organi notranje revizije in za pravno službo ter revizijsko metodologijo.
Responsible for review of and cooperation with internal audit bodies and for legal service and audit methodology.
Uradnik za zvezo med NAOD in Evropskim računskim sodiščem ter uradnik za zvezo med NAOD in Mednarodnim odborom revizorjev za NATO.
Liaison Officer between the NAOD and the European Court of Auditors and Liaison Officer between NAOD and the International Board of Auditors in NATO.
Direktor NAOD (imenovan 1. junija 1986), član izvršne skupine NAOD.
Director in the NAOD (appointed June 1, 1986), member of the executive group of the NAOD.
Kot vodja sekretariata je bil zadolžen za naloge medoddelčnega načrtovanja in revizije, finančno revizijo ter večja preverjanja, zlasti na Ministrstvu za socialne zadeve, Ministrstvu za notranje zadeve in Ministrstvu za okolje.
Head of Secretariat, cross-departmental planning and auditing tasks, financial audit and major examinations of, in particular the Ministry of Social Affairs, the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Environment.
Vodja sekcije v NAOD.
Head of section in the NAOD.
Vodja sekcije v Uradu javnega skrbnika na Ministrstvu za pravosodje.
Head of section in the Ministry of Justice, the Public Trustee's Office.
Enoletno služenje vojaškega roka v vojski in pri Uradu glavnega tožilca za vojaške zadeve.
One year military service in the army and at the Office of the chief prosecutor in military matters.
Dodatne naloge, razen dela v NAOD:
Additional tasks parallel with working in the NAOD:
1989–2001 revizor za Kraljevo dansko kronološko zbirko v Rosenborgu in Amalienborgu.
1989-2001 auditor for The Royal Danish Chronological Collection at Rosenborg and Amalienborg.
Predsednik in član več odborov ter delovnih skupin, povezanih s finančno revizijo, revizijo subvencij in upravnimi vladnimi agencijami.
Chairman and member of several committees and working groups relating to financial audit, subsidy audit and managing government agencies.
V letih 1996–1998 je sodeloval v delovni skupini, ki je pripravila „Evropske smernice za izvajanje revizijskih standardov INTOSAI“.
Participated in 1996-1998 in the working group, which made ” European I m plementing Guideline for the INTOSAI auditing standards ”.
(Skupino je ustanovil Odbor za stike vrhovnih revizijskih institucij v Evropski uniji, ki mu je skupina tudi poročala.)
(The group was established by and reported to the Contact Committee of the Supreme Audit Institutions in the European Union.)
Predavatelj/objavljena dela:
Lecturer/published works:
V obdobju 1982–1995 je predaval na Šoli za diplomirane revizorje na poslovni šoli v Københavnu.
In the period 1982-1995 lectured at the School for Auditor Graduates at the business school in Copenhagen.
Pogosto je imel predavanja in predstavitve o temah, povezanih z revizijami, na primer o „Evropskih smernicah za izvajanje revizijskih standardov INTOSAI“ na estonski vrhovni revizijski instituciji oktobra 2000.
Has often given lectures and made presentations about audit related subjects, for instance ”the European Implementing Guideline for the INTOSAI auditing standards” at the Estonian SAI in October 2000.
Objavil je priročnik o „Osnovnih značilnostih državnega sistema odobrenih proračunskih sredstev in računovodskega sistema“, 1994, ter razne članke, na primer „Načela dobre javne revizijske prakse“, v „EUROSAI“, 6/1999.
Has published a compendium on “the Basic Features of the State’s Appropriation and Accounting System”, 1994 and various articles, for instance ”The Principles of ”Good Public Auditing Practice” in ”EUROSAI”, 6/1999.
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI MORTENA LOUISA LEVYSOHNA NA VPRAŠALNIK
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF MORTEN LOUIS LEVYSOHN TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE
Kaj menite o kritiki izjave o zanesljivosti (DAS), ki jo je Parlament izrazil v poročilu o razrešnici 2003, in delovnih dokumentih za seminar o finančnem poslovodenju ?
What do you think of Parliament's criticisms of the DAS as expressed in the 2003 discharge report and the working documents to the financial management seminar?
Na splošno močno podpiram pobude Parlamenta o izboljšanju finančnega poslovodenja v EU, ki so pripeljale do pobude Komisije o časovnem načrtu.
In general, I am very much in favour of the Parliament's initiatives to improve financial management in the EU which has led to the Commission's Roadmap initiative.
Koncept DAS se je s koncepta, ki je temeljil le na rezultatu celotnega vzorca, razvil v koncept, kjer vsebinski vzorec potrdi rezultat revizije sistema: ta dva dela se podpirata in sta oba potrebna.
The DAS concept has evolved from being a concept which was purely based on the result of a global sample, to a concept where the substantive sample corroborates the result of the system' audit: These two columns support each other and are both necessary.
V mnenju Sodišča o enotni reviziji (št. 2/2004) je Sodišče pozitivno odgovorilo na zahtevo Parlamenta po skladnejšem sistemu nadzora in revizije z večjim poudarkom na delovanju sistemov nadzora in kontrole.
In the Court's opinion on Single Audit (No. 2/2004) the Court responded positively to the Parliament's request for a more coherent control and audit system, with more focus on the functioning of the supervisory and control systems.
Sedanji koncept DAS se je razvijal mnogo let.
The current DAS concept has been developed over a number of years.
Vseeno je to stalen proces, ki še vedno poteka in se zdaj prilagaja za DAS 2005.
However, this is a continuous process which is still under way and is currently being adapted for the DAS 2005.
Komisija je pozdravila pristop analize sistema Sodišča in na splošno ni podvomila v splošne zaključke Sodišča o računovodskih izkazih ter je sprejela načela in priporočila mnenja o „enotni reviziji“.
The Commission has welcomed the Court's system analysis approach and has generally not questioned the Court's overall conclusions on the accounts and has embraced the principles and recommendations in the 'Single Audit' opinion.
Zato menim, da razvoj DAS še ni zaključen.
I thus feel that the development of the DAS is ongoing.
Vseeno mora Sodišče še naprej prisluhniti novim zamislim Parlamenta in jih obravnavati.
The Court must, however, continue to listen and consider new ideas of the Parliament.
Strinjam se, da mora Sodišče razjasniti, kako je uporabilo rezultate „drugih revizorjev“ in letna poročila o delu ter izjave generalnih direktorjev.
I agree that the Court should clarify how it used the results obtained by 'other auditors' and the Annual Activity Reports and declarations from the Directors General.
Viri omenjenih informacij predstavljajo dva dela koncepta DAS za obdobje 2002–2004 in so se kot takšni upoštevali, kadar so bile ustrezne informacije na voljo Sodišču.
The sources of information mentioned constitute two of the columns in the DAS concept for 2002-2004 and have as such been taken into account, whenever the relevant information has been available to the Court.
Vseeno je pomembno opozoriti, da izjave GD same po sebi niso revizijski dokaz, ampak so predstavitve upravljanja.
It is, however, important to note that DG declarations are not in themselves audit evidence, but management representations.
Parlament je povabil Sodišče, da izboljša predstavitev celotne izjave o zanesljivosti in specifičnih ocen z dodajanjem izčrpnejših opisov pridržkov in slabosti v različnih sektorjih in državah članicah.
The Parliament invited the Court to improve the presentation of the global Statement of Assurance and the Specific Appraisals by adding more comprehensive descriptions of the reservations and weaknesses in the different sectors and Member States.
Nedavna letna poročila so vključevala nekaj precej podrobnih informacij o pravilnostih v različnih sektorjih ter so vsebovala priloge z informacijami o kakovosti in ravni izvajanja zahtevanih sistemov upravljanja in nadzora v posameznih državah članicah na področju kmetijstva in strukturnih skladov.
The recent Annual Reports have included some quite detailed information on regularity in the different sectors and have contained annexes which give information on quality and on the level of implementation of the required management and control systems in the individual Member States, in the fields of agriculture and structural funds.
Vseeno mora Sodišče še naprej izboljševati svoje metode za zagotavljanje boljših informacij.
However, the Court should continue to improve its methods to give better information.
Namen DAS in letnega poročila mora biti zagotovitev ocene Sodišča o celotni sliki.
The purpose of the DAS and the Annual Report should be to give the Court's appreciation of the overall picture.
Nadaljnje podrobnosti je morda bolje razložiti v posebnih poročilih.
Further details might be better explained in Special Reports.
Vprašanje v zvezi s sodelovanjem nacionalnih revizijskih organov (NRO) pri povečanju preglednosti in odgovornosti na ravni držav članic se še razvija v Odboru za stike Vrhovnih revizijskih institucij.
The issue concerning the National Audit Institutions' (NAIs) participation in enhancing transparency and accountability at Member State level, is under development in the Contact Committee of the Supreme Audit Institutions.
Glej tudi odgovor na vprašanje 6.
See also my answer to question 6.
Na splošno močno podpiram izboljšan dialog med Računskim sodiščem in Parlamentom.
In general I am very much in favour of an improved dialogue between the Court of Auditors and the Parliament.
V skladu s Pogodbo ES je naloga Računskega sodišča, da poroča o prihodkih in odhodkih EU.
According to the EC Treaty it is the Court of Auditor's task to report on the revenue and expenditure of the EU.
Poročila Sodišča morajo prispevati:
The Court's reports should contribute to:
· k podpiranju kulture odgovornosti in finančne obveznosti v institucijah EU ter
· Supporting a culture of accountability and financial responsibility in the EU institutions and
· h krepitvi evropske politične kulture s prispevanjem k živahni ter dobro utemeljeni razpravi o porabi javnih sredstev na nacionalni ravni in ravni EU.
· Strengthening European political culture by contributing to a lively and well informed debate on the use of public funds at both national and EU level.
Za ohranitev visoke stopnje verodostojnosti morajo poročila Sodišča zagotoviti uravnotežen pregled revidiranega področja, opravljena revizija pa mora ustrezati mednarodnim revizijskim standardom.
In order to maintain a high level of credibility the Court's reports must give a balanced view of the audited area and the audit carried out must live up to international auditing standards.
Sodišče stalno razvija svoje notranje smernice o reviziji in poročanju.
The Court is continuously developing its internal guidelines on auditing and reporting.
S ciljem povečanja preglednosti ter lažje dostopnosti in razumevanja metod, uporabljenih pri pripravi poročil, spletna stran Sodišča zdaj vključuje oddelek o revizijskem pristopu, ki zagotavlja informacije o: delovnem programu; revizijski politiki in standardih; sodelovanju z OLAF-om; Evropskih smernicah za izvajanje revizijskih standardov INTOSAI in revizijskem glosarju.
With the aim of increasing transparency and easier accessibility and understanding of the methods applied in preparation of reports, the Court's web page now includes a section on audit approach which provides information on: the work programme; audit policies and standards; co-operation with OLAF; European Implementing Guidelines for INTOSAI Auditing Standards and an audit glossary.
Danski državni urad za revizijo je več let uporabljal način predstavitve, v skladu s katerim morajo revizijska poročila vedno vsebovati na kratko našteta revizijska vprašanja na začetku poročila, skupaj s pripadajočim seznamom odgovorov iz zaključkov.
For a number of years the National Audit Office of Denmark has used a style of presentation which implies that audit reports should always show the audit questions, briefly listed, in the beginning of the report, together with a matching list of the answers from the conclusions.
Menim, da je to izjemno jasen in bralcu prijazen način predstavitve revizijskih rezultatov; imam vtis, da se podobna praksa vedno pogosteje uporablja v povzetkih Sodišča.
I find this a very clear and reader friendly way of presenting audit results and it is my impression that a similar practice is being increasingly used in the Court's executive summaries.
V prihodnosti si lahko predstavljam letno posebno poročilo o upravljanju sredstev EU na podlagi analize ciljev in rezultatov iz letnih poročil o delu ter izjav generalnih direktorjev.
In the future I could imagine a yearly Special Report concerning the management of EU funds based on an analysis of the objectives and the results reported in Annual Activity Reports and declarations from the Directors General.
Vseeno je predpogoj za opravljanje takšne revizije, da letna poročila o delu vsebujejo ustrezne informacije o ciljih, določenih na vsakem področju politike, in dosežene rezultate ter ustrezne kazalnike upravljanja in informacijske sisteme na področju upravljanja.
However, it is a precondition for doing this type of audit that the Annual Activity Reports contain adequate information on the objectives set under each policy area and the results achieved, as well as relevant management indicators and management information systems.
Katere bi morale biti glavne značilnosti kulture dobrega finančnega poslovodenja v javnih službah?
What should be the main features of a Sound Financial Management culture in any public service?
Menim, da so glavne značilnosti kulture dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, na kratko, obstoj:
I find that the main features of a Sound Financial Management culture, briefly described, are the existence of:
To vključuje pošteno in odgovorno obravnavanje zaposlenih;
This includes fair and responsible treatment of staff.
5. preglednega poročanja in objave rezultatov ter izboljšav, ki jih je dosegla institucija, ter rezultatov dela, ki so ga opravile (notranje) revizijske službe, in vseh potrebnih izboljšav.
Transparent reporting and publication of the results and improvements achieved by the institution, as well as the results of the work carried out by the (internal) audit services and any improvements required.
Dolžnost vsakega člana Računskega sodišča je pomagati Parlamentu pri nadzoru nad izvrševanjem proračuna.
It is the duty of any Member of the Court of Auditors to assist the Parliament in exercising its powers of control over the implementation of the budget.
Glavni prispevek Sodišča v zvezi s tem je letno poročilo Sodišča o računovodskih izkazih, ki jih predložijo Komisija in druge institucije.
The Court's main contribution in this respect is the Court's Annual Report on the accounts presented by the Commission and the other institutions.
Še naprej bom sodeloval pri letni izjavi o zanesljivosti, ki jo poda Sodišče, in zelo pazljivo preučil pripombe Parlamenta med postopkom razrešnice.
I will continue to contribute to the Court's annual Statement of Assurance and very carefully consider the Parliament's comments during the discharge procedure.
V vseh poročilih (letnih ali posebnih) si bom prizadeval, da bo poročanje Sodišča vsebovalo jasno, natančno in uravnoteženo sporočilo za Parlament, s čimer se bo olajšalo delo Parlamenta pri nadzoru.
In all reports (whether Annual or Special Reports) I will strive to give the Court's reporting a clear, precise and balanced message to the Parliament, in order to facilitate the Parliament in its powers of control.
Seveda bom še naprej prispeval k sodelovanju med Sodiščem in Parlamentarnim odborom za proračunski nadzor (COCOBU) z odgovarjanjem na vprašanja in s predstavitvami.
Of course I will also continue to contribute to co-operation between the Court and the COCOBU by answering questions and making presentations.
V zvezi s povabilom Parlamenta, da bi Sodišče pripravilo poročilo o določenem področju, bi se na takšno prošnjo verjetno odzval pozitivno.
As for an invitation by the Parliament to the Court to prepare a report on an area of concern, I would be predisposed to respond positively to such a request.
Marca 2005 je Računsko sodišče sprejelo mnenje o osnutku uredbe o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje finančne uredbe Sveta.
In March 2005 the Court of Auditors adopted an opinion to the draft Regulation laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Council's Financial Regulation.
Julija 2005 je bilo Sodišče zaprošeno, da poda mnenje, ki se še pripravlja, o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti.
In July 2005 the Court was asked to give an opinion, currently being drafted, on a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Council Regulation No. 1605/2002 laying down the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.
Finančna uredba predpisuje pravilno upravljanje sredstev EU.
The Financial Regulation decrees the proper management of EU funds.
Zadnja revizija v letu 2002 je bila obsežna in je uvedla veliko novih določb, ki so podprle reformo Komisije.
The last revision in 2002 was extensive and introduced many new provisions which supported the Commission's reform.
Pomembno je, da nobena nadaljnja revizija ne ogrozi teh določb, ampak ohrani stabilnost osnovnih načel, konceptov in strukture finančne uredbe.
It is important that any further revision should not undermine those provisions but maintain stability as regards the basic principles, concepts and structure of the Financial Regulation.
Dve glavni področji, na kateri bo vplivala načrtovana revizija finančne uredbe in pravil za izvajanje, sta javna naročila in upravljanje subvencij.
The two main areas to be affected by the planned revision of the Financial Regulation and the Implementing Rules are public procurement and grant management.
Komisija meni, da je eden od ciljev sedanje revizije izboljšanje učinkovitosti in preglednosti upravljanja s poenostavitvijo upravljanja pogodb in subvencij, zlasti kadar gre za majhne vrednosti.
According to the Commission one of the objectives of the current revision is to improve efficiency and transparency in the administration by simplifying the management of contracts and grants, especially when these are of low value.