natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Železniška podjetja pa po drugi strani močno nasprotujejo uredbi.
The railway undertakings on the other hand are strongly opposed to the regulation.
Sklicujejo se na lastna prizadevanja (vključno z zgoraj omenjeno listino) in trdijo, da že konkurenca med njimi samimi in tudi med njimi in drugimi oblikami prevoza zadostno spodbuja ponudnike storitev, da izboljšajo storitve.
They point to their own efforts (including the above-mentioned charter) and argue that competition amongst themselves and with other modes of transport already provides a sufficient incentive for service-providers to improve services.
Prav tako opozarjajo na velike razlike med mednarodnimi železniškimi storitvami.
They also draw attention to the considerable diversity of international rail services.
Prav zato bi bilo primerneje oblikovati prilagojene ukrepe, ne pa enotno evropsko najnižjo raven storitev.
This calls for made-to-measure responses rather than a uniform European minimum level of service.
Svet temu predlogu ne daje velike prednosti.
The Council does not seem to assign very high priority to this proposal.
Ker je direktiva o dovoljenjih voznikov vlakov že pripomogla k znatnemu napredku, se o tej uredbi še ni razpravljalo.
Whereas considerable progress has already been made with the directive on the certification of train drivers, this regulation has not yet been discussed.
Stališče poročevalca
The rapporteur's position
Vaš poročevalec je načeloma naklonjen uredbi, ki bi določala pravice potnikov v železniškem prometu.
In principle, your rapporteur is in favour of a regulation governing the rights of rail passengers.
Meni pa, da bi morali upoštevati vse obstoječe mednarodne pogodbe.
However, he considers that we should take account of what already exists internationally.
Zadovoljivih mednarodnih pogodb ne smemo popravljati brez posebnega razloga.
We must not without good reason tinker with international agreements which are already satisfactory.
Celoten sistem mora delovati in predvsem zagotavljati ugodnosti potnikom.
The overall system must be workable, and above all must benefit passengers.
Pravice potnikov morajo potnikom vlivati zaupanje, da se bodo lahko v primeru težav zatekli k določenim postopkom in zahtevali določene najmanjše pravice.
Passengers' rights must give passengers confidence that in the event of problems they will be able to resort to certain procedures and invoke certain minimum rights.
Seveda mi, kot zakonodajno telo, ne smemo prevzeti vloge marketinških upravljavcev železniških postaj.
But we as a legislature must not take over the role of the railway undertakings' marketing managers.
Omejiti se moramo na to, kar je nujno potrebno, in dati podjetjem priložnost, da se s preseganjem tega minimuma presegajo tudi med seboj v kakovosti ali po dodatnih pogodbenih jamstvih.
We must confine ourselves to what is necessary and give the undertakings the chance, over and above this minimum, to excel one another in quality or additional contractual guarantees.
Sprejetje zakonodaje, ki ureja pravice in obveznosti potnikov znotraj Evropske unije, ni enostavno.
The adoption of legislation which lays down the rights and obligations of passengers throughout the European Union is no simple matter.
To dokazuje predlog Komisije.
The Commission proposal is evidence of this.
Predlog posega v nekatera področja zelo daleč, besedilo je pogosto zelo natančno in vsebuje številne določbe, ki v praksi ne delujejo.
In some respects the proposal goes a very long way, and the text is often very detailed and contains a number of provisions which are not workable in practice.
Obseg uredbe je tak, da utegnejo za potnika, ki na istem vlaku sedita drug poleg drugega, veljati različni predpisi, saj je eden na mednarodnem potovanju, drugi pa ne.
The scope of the regulation is such that passengers sitting next to each other on the same train may be governed by different rules because one of them is undertaking an international journey and the other is not.
Vaš poročevalec zato predlaga številne spremembe, s katerimi se razširi obseg uredbe, poenostavijo določene uredbe, razjasni struktura in bistvene določbe naredijo bolj izvedljive.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes a series of amendments with the aim of extending the scope of the regulation, simplifying some provisions, making the structure clearer and rendering the substantive provisions more practicable.
Obseg uporabe: zaščititi je treba tudi pravice potnikov na notranjih poteh
Scope: the rights of domestic passengers should also be safeguarded
Predlog zagotavlja pravice le potnikom v mednarodnem železniškem prometu, saj določa, da velja uredba za vse potnike, ki se odpravijo na mednarodno potovanje , tudi če uporabljajo domačo storitev na začetku ali na koncu poti.
The proposal only gives international rail passengers rights, with the proviso that all passengers who are undertaking international journeys are covered by the regulation, even if they are using a domestic service at the beginning or end of a journey.
Predpisi Uredbe veljajo na primer za potnika, ki potuje, na primer, iz Bruslja v Liverpool, ne samo ko potuje z vlakom Eurostar, ampak tudi ko del te poti prepotuje z domačo storitvijo iz Londona do Liverpoola.
For example, a passenger travelling from Brussels to Liverpool is covered by the rules laid down in the regulation not only while he is on Eurostar but also when, as part of the same journey, he travels on a domestic service from London to Liverpool.
Vaš poročevalec zato ocenjuje, da je obseg, ki ga predlaga Komisija, zavajajoč.
Your rapporteur considers the scope proposed by the Commission to be confusing.
Za potnike, ki potujejo na istem vlaku, tako veljajo različni predpisi, in sicer glede na to, ali so na domačem ali mednarodnem potovanju.
Passengers travelling on the same train would fall under different rules depending on whether they were undertaking a domestic or an international journey.
Poročevalec želi, da bi se ta neenakopravnost pravic in nejasnost odpravila, ter predlaga, da se obseg uredbe razširi na vsa potovanja z vlakom.
Your rapporteur wishes to eliminate this inequality of rights and uncertainty and proposes extending the scope to all train journeys.
Evropska letalska zakonodaja ne razlikuje med domačimi in mednarodnimi leti v zvezi s pravicami potnikov in z odgovornostjo v primeru nesreče.
European aviation legislation does not, after all, distinguish between domestic and international flights when it comes to the protection of passengers' rights and liability in the event of accidents.
Nobenega razloga ni, da se ne bi za železniški promet izbral drugačen pristop.
There is no reason to adopt a different approach to rail transport.
Odnos med uredbo in mednarodnimi pogodbami
The relationship between the regulation and international agreements
Natančne evropske pogodbe o potnikih v železniškem prometu obstajajo že od leta 1980.
Detailed pan-European agreements on passenger transport by rail have existed since 1980.
Podane so v dodatku h Konvenciji COTIF.
They are laid down in an appendix to the COTIF Convention.
42 držav, vključno z vsemi državami članicami EU, razen Estonije, so Konvencijo podpisale.
42 countries, including all the EU Member States except Estonia, are parties to the Convention.
Dodatek h Konvenciji COTIF (Dodatek CIV) podrobno ureja številne pravice in obveznosti potnikov.
The appendix to COTIF (the CIV appendix) regulates in detail a number of rights and obligations of passengers.
Veliko zadev, ki jih določa uredba, je že določenih v Dodatku CIV.
Many of the matters covered by the regulation are also regulated in the CIV appendix.
Namesto, da bi se sklicevala na Dodatek CIV, je Komisija ponavljala delo, ki ga je že opravila medvladna organizacija OTIF, in oblikovala novo besedilo, ki je ohlapno zasnovano na mednarodno določenih načelih in izrazoslovju.
Rather than referring to the CIV, the Commission has repeated the work of the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) and drafted a new text which is loosely based on the internationally established principles and terminology.
Rezultat tega je, da imamo dva zelo podobna instrumenta, ki pa se razlikujeta v formulacijah, strukturi in, deloma, vsebini.
The result of this is two instruments which are very similar but whose formulations, structure and, in places, substance differ.
To lahko zmede vse tiste, ki morajo spoštovati tako določbe v Dodatku CIV kot tudi določbe v uredbi.
This will result in confusion for those who are required to comply both with the CIV appendix and with the regulation.
Vaš poročevalec meni, da mora uredba, kjer je to mogoče, slediti določbam Dodatka CIV.
Your rapporteur considers that, where possible, the regulation should adhere to the provisions of the CIV.
V številnih primerih bi zadostoval sklic na ustrezne člene Dodatka CIV.
In many cases, a reference to the relevant CIV articles would be sufficient.
To velja, na primer, za predpise o odgovornosti in nadomestilu zaradi izgube ali poškodbe prtljage.
This is true, for example, of the rules on liability and compensation for loss of or damage to luggage.
Predpisi v Dodatku CIV so v zvezi s tem veliko jasnejši, Dodatek CIV pa ne vsebuje le predpisov v zvezi s prtljago in ročno prtljago, ampak tudi za živali, ki spremljajo potnike, in za vozila (npr. na avtovlakih).
On this the CIV is far clearer, and it contains rules not only for luggage and hand luggage but also for animals accompanying passengers and for vehicles (e.g. on car trains).
Dodatne določbe so zaželene samo v primerih, ko določbe Dodatka CIV niso ustrezne.
Only in those cases where the CIV really is inadequate are supplementary provisions desirable.
Vaš poročevalec na primer predlaga, da mora biti največje nadomestilo v primeru poškodovanja ali izgube invalidskega vozička ali druge zdravstvene opreme drugačno od tistega, ki je določen v Dodatku CIV.
For example, your rapporteur proposes that in the event of damage to or loss of a wheelchair or other medical equipment the maximum compensation should be different from that provided for in the CIV.
Struktura predloga
The structure of the proposal
Struktura uredbe ni logična.
The structure of the regulation is not always logical.
Določbe v zvezi z odgovornostjo za smrt in poškodbe na primer niso v istem poglavju kot določbe v zvezi z nadomestilom za smrt in poškodbe.
For instance, the provisions concerning liability for death and injury appear in a different chapter to those concerning compensation for death and injury.
Vaš poročevalec je poskušal narediti besedilo preglednejše in bolj logično tako, da je nekatere člene prerazporedil po skupinah ali jih združil.
Your rapporteur has tried to make the text clearer and more logical by regrouping a number of articles or amalgamating them.
Prav tako je poskušal številne formulacije in definicije poenostaviti.
He has also tried to simplify a number of formulations and definitions.
Priprava uporabnega predloga
Making the proposal workable
Vaš poročevalec meni, da je treba zagotoviti najnižjo raven pravic, vendar pa vsega ni treba podrobno urejati.
Your rapporteur considers that a minimum level of rights should be guaranteed, but that not everything need be regulated in detail.
Podjetnikom je treba omogočiti, da sprejemajo tržne odločitve, in jih spodbujati, da pridejo sami do inovativnih rešitev, s katerimi bi naredili železniški prevoz zanimivejši za potnike.
Entrepreneurs must be able to make commercial decisions and must be encouraged to come up with inventive solutions themselves with the aim of making rail transport more attractive to passengers.
Prevelika mera urejanja lahko poleg tega poveča stroške, ki jih mora ponudnik storitev prenesti na potnike, kar podraži železniški promet, s tem pa dodatno izgubi na konkurenčnosti v primerjavi z avtomobilskim prevozom ali drugimi oblikami prevoza.
Moreover, over-regulation can increase costs, which the service-provider will then have to pass on to travellers, making rail transport more expensive, so that it will lose more ground to the car and other modes of transport.
Zato ti dobronamerni ukrepi ne bi dosegli svojega cilja.
As a result, these well-intended measures would fail to achieve their aim.
Vaš poročevalec opozarja, da bi sprejetje predloga Komisije v več vidikih povzročilo huda administrativna bremena, ki niso sorazmerna s tem, kar bi lahko potnik pričakoval od železniškega podjetja.
Your rapporteur notes that, in a number of respects, the implementation of the Commission proposal would result in heavy administrative burdens, which are disproportionate to what a traveller could reasonably expect of a railway undertaking.
To velja, na primer, za sistem nadomestil.
This applies, for example, to the compensation system.
Tabela v Prilogi III prikazuje nadomestilo glede na vrsto vlaka (hitri ali drugi) in trajanje potovanja.
The table in Annex III provides for compensation depending on the type of train (high-speed or other) and the duration of the journey.
Po mnenju vašega poročevalca je pomemben le eno merilo: čas zamude.
In your rapporteur's eyes, only one criterion is relevant: the length of the delay.
Le to merilo je lahko pomembno pri določanju nadomestila.
Only that criterion should play a part in determining compensation.
Vaš poročevalec se prav tako zavzema za dvig spodnje meje.
Your rapporteur also advocates that the minimum threshold be raised.
Obvezno nadomestilo je zaželeno samo, če je zamuda daljša od ene ure (namesto 30 minut, kot predlaga Komisija).
Compulsory compensation is desirable only if a delay exceeds one hour (rather than 30 minutes, as the Commission proposes).
Seveda lahko železniška podjetja znižajo to mejo, vendar pa je to njihova tržna odločitev, ki jo podjetja sprejmejo sama.
Naturally, railway undertakings may lower this threshold, but that would then be a commercial decision to be taken by the undertakings themselves.
Vaš poročevalec predlaga, da se zamenjajo določbe v zvezi s posledično škodo z nekoliko bolj realistično formulacijo od tiste, ki je bila vključena v nedavno sprejeto uredbo o prepovedi vkrcanja na letalo.
Your rapporteur proposes replacing the provision concerning consequential damages with a more realistic formulation which was incorporated in the recently adopted regulation on denied boarding in air travel.
V skladu s to določbo je mogoče zahtevati dodatno nadomestilo za zamudo, na podlagi domače zakonodaje.
According to that provision, it remains possible to claim additional compensation for a delay on the basis of domestic legislation.
V številnih pogledih je predlog preveč podroben in zato se izgubi vpogled v to, kar je dejansko nujno.
In a number of respects the proposal is too detailed and we lose sight of what is essential.
Pregled definicije v zvezi z „zamudo“ to pojasnjuje.
A look at the definition of 'delay' makes this clear.
Vaš poročevalec zato skuša poenostaviti določene točke ali jih, če je to potrebno, črtati.
Your rapporteur therefore seeks to simplify certain points or, if necessary, to delete them.
Dodatni predlogi
Additional proposals
Vaš poročevalec predlaga, da se črta zahteva, po kateri naj bi železniška podjetja sama določila standarde kakovosti storitve, in namesto tega predlaga, da se ustanovijo komisije za preučevanje pritožb potnikov v železniškem prometu.
Your rapporteur proposes deleting the requirement for railway undertakings themselves to define service quality standards and instead to establish independent complaints commissions for railway passengers.
Potniki se lahko obrnejo nanje, če železniška podjetja kršijo pravice potnikov, določene v uredbi, in ob pritožbi potnika ne ukrenejo ničesar.
Passengers can apply to them if railway undertakings violate passengers' rights as defined in the regulation and then fail to act on the customer's complaint.
Kot je že zgoraj zapisano, vaš poročevalec predlaga, da postane nadomestilo obvezno samo v primeru zamude, ki traja dlje od ene ure.
As indicated above, your rapporteur proposes to make compensation compulsory only in the case of delays which exceed one hour.
Po drugi strani pa podpira sistem nadomestil za imetnike sezonskih vozovnic, ki so v določenem obdobju priča ponavljajočim se zamudam.
On the other hand, he advocates a compensation system for season-ticket-holders who encounter recurrent shorter delays within a particular period.
Take določbe že obstajajo v številnih državah članicah, vključno z Združenim kraljestvom.
Such provisions already exist in a number of Member States, including the UK.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravicah in obveznostih potnikov v mednarodnem železniškem prometu
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on International Rail Passengers’ Rights and Obligations
člena 251(2) in 71(1) ES
Articles 251(2) and 71(1) EC
Datum predložitve – A6
Date tabled – A5
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PREDLAGANI PRAVNI PODLAGI............30
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE PROPOSED LEGAL BASIS 31
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ..........................33
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION 33
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dodajanju vitaminov in mineralov ter nekaterih drugih snovi v hrano
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0671 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0671 )
UL C ... / Še neobjavljeno v UL. ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C5‑0538/2003 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5‑0538/2003 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve o predlagani pravni podlagi,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal basis,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano in mnenja Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6‑0124/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0124/2005 ),
(10) Nekatera pomanjkanja hranilnih snovi, ki ne nastopijo zelo pogosto, je trenutno mogoče dokazati v Skupnosti.
(10) Some nutrient deficiencies, although not very frequent, can be demonstrated to exist today in the Community.
Spremembe družbenoekonomskega položaja v Skupnosti in načina življenja različnih skupin prebivalstva so vodile do različnih zahtev v zvezi s prehrano in do spremenljivih prehranjevalnih navad.
Changes in the socio-economic situation prevailing in the Community and the life styles of different groups of the population have led to different nutritional requirements and to changing dietary habits.
To je ponovno vplivalo na spremembe zahtev po energiji in hranilnih snoveh ter na zaužito količino nekaterih vitaminov in mineralov pri različnih skupinah prebivalstva, pri katerih je količina nižja od priporočene količine v različnih državah članicah.
This in turn has led to changes in the energy and nutrient requirements of various groups of the population and to intakes of certain vitamins and minerals for these groups that would be below those recommended in different Member States.
Poleg tega novi znanstveni podatki kažejo na to, da bi bile zaužite količine nekaterih hranilnih snovi za ohranjanje optimalnega zdravja in optimalnega dobrega počutja lahko višje od trenutno priporočenih.
In addition, progress in scientific knowledge indicates that intakes of some nutrients for maintaining optimal health and well being could be higher than those currently recommended.
Zato je nujno, da se razširi definicija „obogatitve“ v predpisih Skupnosti na predpise, ki so določeni z ustreznimi splošnimi načeli Codexa Alimentariusa.
Taking into account the above it is considered that in Community rules the definition on fortification should include but also be extended beyond what is provided in the relevant Codex Alimentarius General Principles.
Komisija navaja, da je v izjemno redkih primerih mogoče ugotoviti pomanjkanje nekaterih hranilnih snovi, vendar jih ne navaja posamezno.
The Commission states that some nutrient deficiencies are very rarely recorded without, however, giving details of these observations.
Komisija uporablja pomanjkanje nekaterih hranilnih snovi, zato da predlaga in utemeljuje možnosti za prostovoljno dodajanje vitaminov in mineralov vsem živilom.
Nevertheless, such nutrient deficiencies are used by the Commission to propose and justify opportunities for voluntarily adding vitamins and minerals to all foods.
Skupnost si mora prizadevati za stanje na trgu, ko proizvajalci dodajajo vitamine in minerale ob upoštevanju prehrane in zdravja in ne zaradi dajanja na trg.
The Community should aim for a market situation in which producers add vitamins and minerals to foods on nutritional or health grounds and not for marketing reasons.
Poleg tega se lahko živila, ki so obogatena z nekaterimi hranilnimi snovmi, za povsem določeno, natančno definirano skupino prebivalstva (skupino, ki ima pomanjkanje, ali skupino z večjimi potrebami, na primer noseče ženske), dajejo na trg kot živila za posebno prehrano ali živila za posebne zdravstvene namene po določbah Skupnosti, ki veljajo za ta živila.
Furthermore, fortified foodstuffs containing certain nutrients for a specific, closely defined population group (with a deficiency or with a higher requirement, for instance pregnant women) can already be marketed as foodstuffs for particular nutritional requirements or as foodstuffs for medicinal purposes under existing Community rules.
(12) Kemične snovi, uporabljene kot viri vitaminov in mineralov, ki se dodajo živilom, morajo biti varne in biorazpoložljive, tj. razpoložljive telesu za uporabo.
(12) The chemical substances used as sources of vitamins and minerals to be added to food should be safe and also be bio-available i.e. available to be used by the body.
Zato je treba oblikovati tudi pozitiven seznam teh snovi.
For this reason a positive list of these substances should also be established.
Na pozitivnem seznamu morajo biti navedene snovi, ki jih je odobril Znanstveni odbor za živila (mnenje, izraženo 12. maja 1999), na podlagi zgornjih meril varnosti in biorazpoložljivosti in ki se lahko uporabljajo pri izdelavi živil, namenjenih dojenčkom in malim otrokom, ali pri živilih za posebne prehranske namene ali pri dodatkih živilom.
Such substances that have been approved by the Scientific Committee for Food (opinion expressed on 12 May 1999), on the basis of the above criteria of safety and bioavailability, and can be used in the manufacture of foods intended for infants and young children, in other foods for particular nutritional uses or in food supplements should appear in this positive list.
(12) Kemične snovi, uporabljene kot viri vitaminov in mineralov, ki se lahko dodajo živilom, morajo biti varne in biorazpoložljive, tj. razpoložljive telesu za uporabo.
(12) The chemical substances used as sources of vitamins and minerals which may be added to food must be safe and also be bio-available i.e. available to be used by the body.
Na pozitivnem seznamu morajo biti navedene snovi, ki jih je odobril Znanstveni odbor za živila (mnenje, izraženo 12. maja 1999), na podlagi zgornjih meril varnosti in biorazpoložljivosti in ki se lahko uporabljajo pri izdelavi živil, namenjenih vsem slojem prebivalstva, vključno z dojenčki in malimi otroki , pri drugih živilih za posebne prehranske namene ali pri dodatkih živilom.
Such substances that have been approved by the Scientific Committee for Food (opinion expressed on 12 May 1999), on the basis of the above criteria of safety and bioavailability, and can be used in the manufacture of foods intended for all sections of the population, including infants and young children, in other foods for particular nutritional uses or in food supplements should appear in this positive list.