natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pri odločanju o pogodbah o izvajanju javne službe in njihovem sklepanju v skladu z členom 5(2) do (5) države članice zagotovijo zainteresiranim konkurentom pravno varstvo, ki je ravno tako učinkovito, kot to določa Direktiva Sveta št. 89/665/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1989 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o uporabi revizijskih postopkov oddaje javnih naročil za preskrbo in javnih naročil za gradnje.
When deciding on and awarding public service contracts under Article 5(2) to (5), Member States shall provide legal protection for those interested in tendering which is as effective as that provided by Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts.
Brez poseganja v odstavek 3 je sklepanje pogodb o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega prevoza v skladu s členom 5 od …*.
Without prejudice to paragraph 3, the award of public service contracts by rail and by road shall comply with Article 5 as from …*.
Države članice v tem prehodnem obdobju sprejmejo ukrepe za postopno uskladitev s členom 5, da bi preprečile resne strukturne težave, zlasti v zvezi s prevoznimi zmogljivostmi.
During this transitional period Member States shall take measures to gradually comply with Article 5 in order to avoid serious structural problems in particular relating to transport capacity.
* Opomba za UL: 12 let po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
* Note for OJ: 12 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
* Opomba za UL: 8 let po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
* Note for OJ: 8 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Pogodbe iz točke (a) se lahko izvajajo do izteka njihove veljavnosti.
The contracts referred to in (a) may continue until they expire.
Pogodbe iz točk (b) in (c) se lahko izvajajo do izteka njihove veljavnosti, vendar največ 30 let .
The contracts referred to in (b) and (c) may continue until they expire, but for no longer than 30 years .
Pogodbe iz točke (d) se lahko izvajajo do izteka njihove veljavnosti, če imajo omejeno veljavnost, primerljivo z veljavnostmi, določenimi v členu 4 te uredbe.
The contracts referred to in (d) may continue until they expire, provided they are of limited duration comparable to the durations specified in Article 4.
Pogodbe iz točk (b) in (c) se lahko izvajajo do izteka njihove veljavnosti, vendar največ 15 let .
The contracts referred to in (b) and (c) may continue until they expire, but for no longer than 15 years .
Pogodbe iz točk (b) in (d) se lahko izvajajo do izteka njihove veljavnosti, če imajo omejeno veljavnost, primerljivo z veljavnostmi, določenimi v členu 4 te uredbe.
The contracts referred to in (b) and (d) may continue until they expire, provided they are of limited duration comparable to the durations specified in Article 4.
Ker je revizija te uredbe že od leta 2000 v zakonodajnem postopku, se lahko ta prehodna ureditev bistveno skrajša.
As the legislative procedure for revision of this regulation has been in operation since 2000, this transitional provision can be substantially shortened.
To je tudi nujno za hitro dosego visokokakovostnega ter za potnike in davkoplačevalce cenovno ugodnega javnega prevoza.
This would also more rapidly achieve a high quality public transport service providing good value for passengers and taxpayers.
Pritožbeni postopek
Appeal procedures
Države članice izvajalcem in drugim zainteresiranim stranem zagotovijo pravico do pritožbe na javno telo ali sodišče zoper odločitve in predhodne odločitve pristojnih organov v skladu s to uredbo.
Member States shall guarantee operators and other interested parties the right to lodge an appeal with a public or judicial body against decisions and preliminary decisions taken by competent authorities under this Regulation.
Subjekt iz prvega odstavka je neodvisen od pristojnih organov in vključenih operaterjev in je pooblaščen za pridobitev vseh potrebnih podatkov od vseh udeleženih strani, za sprejem zavezujočih odločitev in dodelitev odškodnine.
The body referred to in paragraph 1 shall be independent of the competent authorities concerned and of the operators involved and shall be empowered to request any relevant information from any party concerned, to take binding decisions and to award damages.
Če subjekt ni sodni organ, potem so njegove odločitve predmet sodnega nadzora.
Where this body is not a judicial body, its decisions shall be subject to judicial review.
Določbe v zvezi z uporabo pritožbenega postopka opredelijo države članice.
The provisions governing implementation of the appeal procedure shall be determined by the Member States.
Pri čezmejnih storitvah pristojni organ za reševanje pritožb določijo ustrezni organi.
As regards cross-border services, the authorities concerned shall agree on which appeal body shall be competent.
Brez poseganja v člene 73, 86, 87 in 88 Pogodbe lahko države članice še naprej dodeljujejo pomoči za prometni sektor v skladu s členom 73 Pogodbe, če so potrebne za usklajevanje prevoza ali če so nadomestilo za opravljanje določenih storitev, ki so del javne službe in niso zajete v tej uredbi, ter zlasti :
Without prejudice to Articles 73, 86, 87 and 88 of the Treaty, Member States may continue to grant aids for the transport sector pursuant to Article 73 of the Treaty which meet the needs of coordination of transport or which represent reimbursement for the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a public service, other than those covered by this Regulation, and in particular :
Države članice lahko v skladu s členom 73 Pogodbe še naprej dodeljujejo pomoči za prometni sektor, če so potrebne za usklajevanje prevoza ali če so nadomestilo za opravljanje določenih storitev, ki so del javne službe in niso zajete v tej uredbi, na primer :
Member Sates may , in accordance with Article 73 of the Treaty, continue to grant aids for the transport sector which meet the need of coordination of transport or which represent reimbursement for the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a public service, other than those covered by this Regulation, such as for example :
Takšna pomoč je omejena na fazo raziskav in razvoja in ne sme zajemati komercialnega izkoriščanja takšnih prevoznih sistemov in tehnologij.
Such aid shall be restricted to the research and development stage and may not cover the commercial exploitation of such transport systems and technologies.
Za zagotavljanje uresničevanja zastavljenih ciljev, morajo ukrepi, predvideni s tem členom, podpirati tudi fazo izvedbe in ne le faze raziskav in razvoja.
In order to ensure that the set targets are achieved, the measures laid down in this article should support not only the research and development stage but also the operational stage.
Ta uredba začne veljati dne ………………………………*.
This Regulation shall enter into force on ………………………………*.
* Opomba za UL: tri leta po objavi Uredbe v Uradnem listu.
∗ Note for OJ: three years following publication of the Regulation in the Official Journal.
* Opomba za UL: 18 mesecev po objavi Uredbe v Uradnem listu.
∗ Note for OJ: 18 months following publication of the Regulation in the Official Journal.
Priloga, točka 2 a (novo)
Annex, point 2 a (new)
Stroški, ki so vključeni v ta izračun, se določijo na podlagi stroškov, ki bi jih pri izpolnjevanju teh obveznosti imelo povprečno, dobro vodeno in s prevoznimi sredstvi ustrezno opremljeno podjetje.
The costs to be included in this calculation must be in line with the costs that an average, well-managed enterprise, with sufficient means of transport to meet its public service obligations, would have incurred in fulfilling these obligations.
Priloga, odstavek 3 a (novo)
Annex, paragraph 3 a (new)
Kompenzacijsko izplačilo prav tako ne sme prekoračiti zneska, ki ustreza finančnem neto učinku vsote (pozitivnih ali negativnih) učinkov izpolnjevanja obveznosti javne službe na stroške in prihodke izvajalca javne službe, če pri tem kot osnovo upoštevamo stroške , ki bi jih pri izpolnjevanju teh obveznosti imelo povprečno, dobro vodeno in s prevoznimi sredstvi ustrezno opremljeno podjetje.
The compensation must not exceed the amount corresponding to the net financial effect of the sum of the (positive or negative) impact on the costs and revenue of a public service operator as a result of fulfilling public service obligations, on the basis of the costs that an average, well-managed enterprise, with sufficient means of transport to meet its public service obligations, would have incurred in fulfilling these obligations.
Pri analizi teh stroškov se je treba kolikor je mogoče sklicevati na stopnje in parametre, ki bi se uporabili pri izračunu primerljivih obveznosti javne službe v okviru javnega razpisa v skladu s členom 5(3) ali v okviru za konkurenco odprtega razpisnega postopka v skladu z direktivama 2004/17/ES ali 2004/18/ES.
In analysing these costs, as far as possible reference should be made to the rates and parameters that would have applied to comparable public service obligations in the context of a tendering procedure pursuant to Article 5(3) or an open tendering procedure pursuant to Directives 2004/17/EC or 2004/18/EC .
Gre za odločilno merilo, ki zagotavlja, da se tudi v primeru neposrednega sklepanja pogodb poskrbi za učinkovito in gospodarno zagotavljanje storitev in tako učinkovito izključi prekomerne kompenzacije.
This is the key criterion to ensure efficient and economic service provision, even when contracts are awarded directly, and thus effectively to exclude overcompensation .
Na začetku je javni cestni in železniški prevoz uporabljalo sorazmerno malo ljudi, predvsem premožnih, ki so se nato večinoma odločali za potovanje z avtom.
At its inception, public transport by road and rail served a relatively small and affluent clientele - people who later would mostly opt to travel by car.
Podjetniki so vlagali kapital in znanje v pričakovanju, da bodo lahko na tem novem trgu iztržili dobiček.
Entrepreneurs invested capital and know-how in the expectation that they would be able to make a profit in this new market.
Zaradi naraščajočih izgub se je pozneje velik del javnega prevoza omejil na najbolj prometne ure dneva in najbolj prometne poti ali pa je bil v celoti odpravljen.
Due to growing losses, much public transport was later restricted to the busiest times of day and the busiest routes, or was even eliminated altogether.
Če bi se uporabljala le tržna načela, bi se število poti in pogostost prevozov zmanjšala, prevoznine pa bistveno povečale.
If purely market principles had been applied, reductions in numbers of routes and frequencies would have been inevitable, as would substantial fare increases.
V nasprotju s tem si organi, zlasti v mestnih območjih, prizadevajo za izboljšanje javnega prevoza, da bi omejili prostor, ki ga prevzemajo avtomobili, ohranili dostopnost do stanovanjskih, zaposlitvenih območij in območij za rekreacijo ter da bi v boju proti okoljskim težavam, ki jih povzroča promet, storili, kar je v njihovi moči.
In opposition to this trend, authorities - particularly in urban regions - seek to improve public transport in order to limit the space commandeered by cars, to keep residential areas, employment areas and recreation areas accessible and to do what they can to combat the environmental nuisance caused by traffic.
Prizadevanja za ohranitev in širitev rednih prevoznih storitev so zato vedno bolj pogojena s tem, da storitve prevzamejo izvajalci v lasti lokalnih ali regionalnih organov ali države.
Efforts to preserve and expand scheduled transport services have therefore become increasingly dependent on the services being taken over by operators owned by local or regional authorities or the State.
Zasebni izvajalci, ki še obstajajo, so odvisni od javnih sredstev, s katerimi pokrijejo neizogiben primanjkljaj iz rednega poslovanja.
Where private operators have remained in existence, they have become dependent on public funding to cover their unavoidable operating deficits.
Javna podjetja in zasebni pogodbeniki so tako pridobili monopol na pravico do izvajanja rednih storitev in na dostop do javnih sredstev.
As a result, both public enterprises and private contract partners have acquired monopolies on the right to provide scheduled services and on access to public funding.
Predlog Komisije iz leta 2000
Commission proposal of 2000
V 90-ih letih 20. stoletja so bile opravljene študije o novem sistemu konkurence, financiranja in dodeljevanja območij, „regulirani konkurenci“, ki bi nadomestila vse doslej obstoječe različne nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne sisteme.
In the 1990s, studies were performed on a new system of competition, financing and allocation of areas, 'regulated competition', which would replace all the different hitherto existing national, regional and local systems.
To je ustvarilo pričakovanje, da je treba v prihodnosti postopke javnih naročil upoštevati v vsej EU.
This created an expectation that in future public procurement procedures would have to be adhered to throughout EU territory.
Nekatere države članice so takšen sistem napovedale že pri reviziji svoje nacionalne zakonodaje.
Some Member States have already anticipated such a system when revising their national legislation.
Komisija je nato v obrazložitvenem memorandumu k predlogu uredbe iz leta 2000 opozorila na obstoječi zakonodajni okvir, zlasti na:
Subsequently, the Commission, in the explanatory memorandum on its proposal for a regulation of 2000, drew attention to the existing legislative framework, particularly:
- člen 73 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim je pomoč skladna s Pogodbo, če pomeni povračilo za izvajanje nekaterih obveznosti iz koncepta „javne službe“,
- Article 73 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which aid is compatible with the Treaty if it represents reimbursement for the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a 'public service';
- Uredbo (EGS) št. 1191/69, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (EGS) št. 1893/91, ki našteva oblike nadomestil, ki so izvzete iz zahteve po obveščanju o državni pomoči iz člena 88(3) Pogodbe.
- Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1893/91, which enumerates these forms of compensation, which are exempt from the requirement to notify State aid as referred to in Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Uredba kljub temu ni določala, kako je treba sklepati pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe ali kako naj bi odprli trge.
However, this Regulation did not lay down how public service contracts should be awarded or how markets should be opened up.
Postopek sklepanja sta delno urejali Direktivi 92/50/ES in 93/38/EGS, ki sta ju leta 2004 nadomestili Direktivi 2004/17/EGS in 2004/18/EGS.
The award procedure was partially regulated in Directives 92/50/EC and 93/38/EEC, which in 2004 were to be replaced by Directives 2004/17/EEC and 2004/18/EEC.
Toda za številne pogodbe (in zlasti koncesije) ti postopki niso veljali.
However, there are many contracts (and particularly concessions) to which these procedures do not apply.
Po drugi strani so uredba, ki jo je takrat predlagala Komisija, in tudi kasneje spremenjeni predlogi, določali ravno obratno.
The Regulation as then proposed by the Commission and also the later amended proposals, on the other hand, did provide for them.
Komisija je tudi opozorila na spremembo razmer zaradi vse večjega števila velikih mednarodnih družb.
The Commission also drew attention to the change in the situation due to the rise of large international corporations.
Te ponujajo prevzem avtobusnih, tramvajskih in železniških storitev od javnih organov in zasebnih imetnikov koncesij, pod pogojem da prejmejo finančno nadomestilo za pričakovan primanjkljaj pri rednem poslovanju, vključno s podporo, ki jim omogoča delovanje z dobičkom.
These offer to take bus, tram and rail services over from public authorities and private concession-holders on condition that they receive financial compensation for the anticipated operating deficit, including a grant which enables them to operate at a profit.
Komisija je 20. julija 2000 izrazila željo po zagotavljanju preglednosti in enake obravnave podjetij z uredbo, predlagano v KOM(2000)0007 , ter tako zagotovila, da proti pristojnim organom, ki so dolgoročne koncesije dodeljevali izvajalcem, s katerimi so imeli tradicionalne ali prijateljske odnose, niso pravno ukrepala druga zainteresirana podjetja.
On 20 July 2000, the Commission indicated its desire to guarantee transparency and equal treatment of enterprises by means of the regulation proposed in COM(2000)0007 , thus ensuring that the award by competent authorities of long-term concessions to operators with which they had traditional relationships or were on friendly terms did not result in legal action being brought by other interested businesses.
S tem namenom je bil oblikovan predlog, da bi konkurenco med podjetji vzpostavili z javnim razpisom za petletno pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe.
In order to achieve this, it was proposed that competition should be introduced between businesses, to be effected by inviting them to tender for five-year public-service contracts.
Druge oblike izbire podjetij bi bile mogoče le še v izjemnih primerih.
Other forms of selection of businesses would only remain possible in exceptional cases.
Lokalni in regionalni organi, organizacije uporabnikov, okoljske organizacije in sindikati so močno nasprotovali zahtevi po izvajanju postopka javnih naročil v vsakem primeru.
Local and regional authorities, users' organisations, environmental organisations and trade unions raised serious objections to the requirement to carry out public procurement procedures in every case.
Delno so temu nasprotovali zaradi pričakovanja, da bi ta zahteva dokončno onemogočila nadaljnji obstoj mnogih mestnih in regionalnih izvajalcev v javni lasti, saj so bila zadevna podjetja ustanovljena za čim bolj učinkovito zadovoljitev potreb domačega trga in ne s ciljem konkuriranja v nekaterih oddaljenih krajih.
They did so partly out of an expectation that ultimately this requirement would make it impossible for the many publicly owned urban and regional operators to remain in existence, because the businesses in question were established to serve a home market as effectively as possible and not with the aim of competing in some remote place.
Za likvidacijo bi ta podjetja potrebovala le eno izločitev iz postopka razpisa, na primer zaradi cenovne konkurence večjega podjetja.
They would only need to be eliminated from a tender procedure once, for example because of price competition from a larger business, in order to go into liquidation.
Razen tega so vsa zadevna podjetja nasprotovala predlaganemu petletnemu trajanju pogodb, ker bi pomanjkanje kontinuitete oviralo investicije.
In addition, all the businesses concerned objected to the proposed five-year term for contracts, because such a lack of continuity would hamper investment.
Sindikati so zahtevali, da se v primeru rednega izvajanja javnih razpisov prometno osebje zaščiti pred odpuščanjem in slabšimi pogoji zaposlovanja z novim pogodbenim partnerjem.
If invitations to tender were to be issued periodically, trade unions called for transport staff to be protected against dismissal and against poorer terms of employment with a new contractual partner.
Viri iz različnih držav članic so opozarjali na velike razlike med praksami držav in na neželeno uvajanje enotnih pravil na ravni EU zaradi neupoštevanja izkušenj, pridobljenih s pomočjo teh praks.
Sources in the various Member States drew attention to the wide variation of practices between countries and the undesirability of imposing uniform rules at EU level while ignoring the experience gained by means of those practices.
V skladu s temi cilji je Parlament v prvi obravnavi 14. novembra 2001 s 317 glasovi proti 224 sprejel predloge sprememb, med drugim za možnost zagotavljanja storitev prevoza s tramvajem in podzemno železnico ter rednih avtobusnih storitev v območju 50 km brez postopka javnih naročil.
In accordance with these objections, Parliament adopted amendments at first reading on 14 November 2001 by 317 votes to 224, inter alia to make it possible to provide tram and underground services and scheduled bus services within a range of 50 km without a public procurement procedure.
Kjer bi se ta postopek izvajal, mora konkurenca temeljiti na ceni in kakovosti, medtem ko bi se trajanje pogodbe podaljšalo na 8 let za avtobusne storitve in na 15 let za železnico.
Where such a procedure was held, competition should be based not only on price but also on quality, while the contract terms were extended to 8 years for bus services and 15 years for rail.
Zahteve po preglednosti, ki jih je Komisija predlagala za postopke javnih naročil, so bile sprejete.
The transparency requirements which the Commission had proposed for public procurement procedures were accepted.
Po prvi obravnavi je preteklo več kot šest let, preden je Svet dosegel dogovor o skupnem stališču o predlogu uredbe.
After first reading it was more than six years before the Council succeeded in agreeing a common position on the proposal for a regulation.
K temu je pripomogla predložitev revidiranega stališča Komisije 20. julija 2005 v dokumentu KOM(2005)0319 , ki je v veliki meri upoštevala stališče Parlamenta, sprejeto leta 2001.
One factor which helped it to do so was that on 20 July 2005 in COM(2005)0319 the Commission submitted a revised position, largely adhering to the position adopted by Parliament in 2001.
Leta 2006 je Svet pod predsedstvom Avstrije dosegel podoben sklep, potem pa je predsedstvo Nemčije dokončalo predlog z nekaj izboljšavami v zvezi z odnosom med to uredbo in Direktivo 2004/18/EGS o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev ter Direktivo 2004/17/EGS o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev.
In 2006, under the Presidency of Austria, the Council reached a similar conclusion, after which the German Presidency finalised the proposal, with a few refinements regarding the relationship between this regulation and Directive 2004/18/EEC on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, and Directive 2004/17/EEC coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors.
Za to različico predloga je bila značilna večja subsidiarnost za države članice, kot jo je predvidel predlog Komisije iz leta 2000; zlasti v mestih in strnjenih naseljih bodo prevoz še vedno lahko zagotavljali izvajalci v javni lasti.
This version of the proposal is characterised by greater subsidiarity for the Member States than provided for in the Commission proposal of 2000; in particular, it will remain possible for transport to be provided in towns and conurbations by publicly owned operators.
Skupno stališče Sveta poleg izvajalcev v javni lasti in javnih naročil dopušča še tretjo možnost, neposredno sklenitev pogodbe.
In addition to publicly owned operators and public tender procedures, the Council's common position permits a third option, direct award.
Stališče Parlamenta iz prve obravnave leta 2001, revidirano stališče Komisije iz leta 2005 in skupno stališče Sveta iz leta 2006 so zdaj v veliki meri usklajeni.
There is now a large measure of agreement between Parliament's position at first reading in 2001, the Commission's revised position of 2005 and the common position of the Council of 2006.
Predlog poročevalca temelji na tej usklajenosti.
Your rapporteur bases his proposal on this agreement.
Predlogi sprememb, ki jih predlaga Odboru za promet in turizem, obravnavajo vprašanja nevladnih organizacij glede pravne varnosti in kakovosti.
The amendments which he proposed to Parliament's Committee on Transport and Tourism dealt with points raised by non-governmental organisations regarding legal certainty and quality.
Posledica izvajanja te uredbe bi lahko bilo zmanjšanje kontinuitete v delovanju.
One consequence of the application of this regulation could be a reduction in the continuity of operation.