natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Aerosoli (razen v odmernih inhalatorjih in za čiščenje elektronskih delov ter kjer varnostni predpisi ne dopuščajo alternativ)
Aerosols (except in metered dose inhalers and for cleaning of electronic compo n ents and where saf e ty regulations prohibit alternatives)
Za večino aerosolov, razen za odmerne inhalatorje in za čiščenje nekaterih elektronskih delov, so na voljo alternative.
Alternatives are available for most of aerosols except for metered dose inhalers and for certain cleaning of electronic components.
Zato takšne uporabe dopuščajo izjemo.
Therefore an exemption is made for such uses.
Priloga II, vrstica 9 b (novo)
Annex II, row 9 b (new)
Domači sistemi za hlajenje z manj kot 150g hladilnega polnila
Domestic refrigeration systems with less than 150g of refrigerant charge
Štiri leta po datumu začetka veljavnosti
Four years after the date of entry into force
Priloga II, vrstica 9 c (novo)
Annex II, row 9 c (new)
Komercialno in industrijsko hlajenje, razen če je zahtevano za izpolnjevanje varnostnih standardov
Commercial and industrial refrigeration, except when required to meet safety standards
Številni proizvajalci namesto fluoriranih ogljikovodikov pri komercialnem hlajenju že uporabljajo alternativna hladilna sredstva.
A number of manufacturers have already been using alternative refrigerants to hydrofluorocarbons in commercial refrigeration.
Priloga II, vrstica 9 d (novo)
Annex II, row 9 d (new)
Nepremične klimatske naprave, razen če so zahtevane za izpolnjevanje varnostnih standardov
Stationary air-conditioning, except when required to meet safety standards
Vlagatelj se zavzema za spremembo pravne podlage člena 95, da bo industrijsko načrtovanje varno za celoten evropski trg.
The tabler supports the change in the legal basis, to Article 95, so that the industry can plan with certainty for the entire European market.
Podnebne težave so svetovni problem, zato je treba sprejeti ne le nacionalne, ampak vsaj evropske ukrepe.
The climate problem is a global problem, and for that reason it is not national measures which are required, but measures which are at least European in scope.
Sprememba pravne podlage vsekakor pomeni, da lahko države članice le z velikimi težavami presežejo zahteve, določene v tej direktivi.
However, the change in the legal basis will make it very difficult for Member States to go beyond the requirements laid down in the directive.
Zato morajo biti zahteve strožje, kot je predvideno v Skupnem stališču.
Accordingly, the requirements must be stricter than those incorporated in the common position.
Priloga II, vrstica 9 e (novo)
Annex II, row 9 e (new)
Sledilni plin, razen za uporabo v laboratorijih
Trace gas, except for use in laboratories
Alternative, kot so ogljikovodiki, so na voljo za večino uporab SF6 v sledilnem plinu, razen za nekatere uporabe v laboratorijih.
Alternatives such as hydrocarbons are available for most uses of SF6 as a trace gas except for certain laboratory uses.
Priloga II, vrstica 9 f (novo)
Annex II, row 9 f (new)
Vse aplikacije, razen v stikalnih mehanizmih
All applications, except in switchgears
Sprememba pravne podlage vsekakor pomeni, da lahko države članice le z velikimi težavami presežejo zahteve, določene v tej direktivi.
However, the change to the legal basis will make it very difficult for Member States to go beyond the requirements laid down in the regulation.
Skupno stališče Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določenih fluoriranih toplogrednih plinih
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain flourinated greenhouse gases
členi 251(2), 175 in 95 ES
Article 251(2), 175 and 95 EC
o predlogu Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Odločbe št. 2256/2003/ES zaradi podaljšanja programa za razširjanje dobrih praks in spremljanja vzpostavitve informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije v leto 2006
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 2256/2003/EC in view of the extension of the programme in 2006 for the dissemination of good practices and monitoring ICT take-up
(Poenostavljeni postopek – člen 43(1) Poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure - Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0347 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0347 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 157(3) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0247/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 157(3) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0247/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 51 in 43(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6‑0302/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0302/2005 ),
Predlog Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Odločbe št. 2256/2003/ES zaradi podaljšanja programa za razširjanje dobrih praks in spremljanja vzpostavitve informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije v leto 2006
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 2256/2003/EC in view of the programme in 2006 for the dissemination of good practices and monitoring ICT take-up
Odbori, ki niso dali mnenja
Not delivering opinions
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Direktive 90/544/EGS o frekvenčnih pasovih, ki so določeni za usklajeno uvajanje vseevropskega kopenskega javnega radijskega osebnega klica v Skupnosti
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 90/544/EEC on the frequency bands designated for the coordinated introduction of pan-European land-based public radio paging in the Community
(Poenostavljeni postopek-člen 43(1) Poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure - Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0361 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0361 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0248/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0248/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6‑0303/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0303/2005 ),
Razveljavitev Direktive 90/544/EGS o frekvenčnih pasovih, ki so določeni za usklajeno uvajanje vseevropskega kopenskega javnega radijskega osebnega klica v Skupnosti
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 90/544/EEC on the frequency bands designated for the coordinated introduction of pan-European land-based public radio paging in the Community
člen 251(2) in člen 95 ES
Articles 251(2) and 95 EC
Datum predložitve EP
Date sumbitted to Parliament
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o standardih humanega lova nekaterih živalskih vrst s pastmi
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing humane trapping standards for certain animal species
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PREDLAGANI PRAVNI PODLAGI..............8
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE PROPOSED LEGAL BASIS 8
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0532 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0532 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 175(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0100/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0100/2004 ),
- ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve o predlagani pravni podlagi,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal basis,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0304/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0304/2005 ),
Zadeva: Pravna podlaga predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o standardih humanega lova nekaterih živalskih vrst s pastmi ( KOM(2004)0532 – C6‑0100/2004 – 2004/0183(COD) )
Subject: Legal basis of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing humane trapping standards for certain animal species ( COM(2004)0532 – C6‑0100/2004 – 2004/0183(COD) )
na seji 6. oktobra 2005 se je Odbor za pravne zadeve na svojo pobudo v skladu s členom 35(3) Poslovnika odločil, da bo obravnaval pravilnost in primernost pravne podlage omenjenega predloga Komisije.
At its meeting on 6 October 2005 the Committee on Legal Affairs decided on its own initiative, pursuant to Rule 35(3) of the Rules of Procedure, to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Stališče Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti je, da izbira pravne podlage ne sme biti subjektivna, pač pa "mora temeljiti na objektivnih dejavnikih, ki jih je mogoče sodno preskusiti",
According to the Court of Justice the choice of legal basis is not a subjective one, but "must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review"
Še več, odločilni dejavnik mora biti glavni cilj ukrepa.
Furthermore, the decisive factor should be the main object of a measure.
Direktiva nedvomno v prvi vrsti – pravzaprav skoraj izključno – obravnava dobrobit nekaterih vrst prosto živečih živali.
There is no doubt that the directive is primarily - indeed virtually exclusively - concerned with the welfare of certain species of wild animals.
V zvezi s tem velja omeniti, da v preambuli direktive piše, da direktiva ne posega v Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 3254/91 z dne 4. novembra 1991 o prepovedi uporabe stopalk v Skupnosti in vnosa v Skupnost kožuhov in izdelanega blaga iz nekaterih prosto živečih živalskih vrst, ki izvirajo iz držav, kjer jih lovijo s stopalkami ali z načini lova s pastmi, ki ne izpolnjujejo mednarodnih standardov humanega lova s pastmi
It may be noted in this connection that it is stated in the preamble that the directive is without prejudice to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3254/91 of 4 November 1991 prohibiting the use of leghold traps in the Community and the introduction into the Community of pelts and manufactured goods of certain wild animal species originating in countries which catch them by means of leghold traps or trapping methods which do not meet international humane trapping standards
Uredba temelji na členih 133 in 175 Pogodbe ES, kar pomeni, da je vsaj leta 1991 zakonodaja Skupnosti določala, da dobrobit prosto živečih živali sodi v okvir okoljske politike.
That Regulation is based on Articles 133 and 175 of the EC Treaty, which suggests that at least in 1991 the Community legislature considered that the welfare of wild animals fell within the scope of environment policy.
Uredbo so izpodbijali le enkrat, pravna podlaga pa ni bila vprašljiva.
That regulation has been litigated only once, and the legal basis was not called in question
Poleg tega uvodna izjava 3 navaja, da bo uporaba teh mednarodno dogovorjenih standardov humanega lova s pastmi "pozitivno vplivala na dobrobit ujetih živali in prispevala k varstvu prosto živečih živalskih vrst tako znotraj kot izven Skupnosti.
Furthermore, recital 3 states that internationally agreed humane trapping standards "will have a positive effect on the welfare of the trapped animals contributing to the protection of species of wild fauna both within and outside the Community.
Zagotavljanje dovolj visoke stopnje dobrobiti ujetih prosto živečih živali za namene upravljanja s prosto živečimi živalmi in za ujetje navedenih sesalcev zaradi ohranjanja bi moralo prispevati k izpolnjevanju ciljev okoljske politike Skupnosti.
Ensuring a sufficient level of welfare of wild animals when trapped for wildlife management purposes and for the capture of those mammals for conservation should contribute to implementing the objectives of the Community’s environment policy.
Na takšen način pa bo Skupnost še posebej prispevala k preudarni, trajnostni in racionalni rabi naravnih virov in spodbujala ukrepe na mednarodni ravni za spopadanje z okoljskimi težavami po vsem svetu."
More in particular, by so doing, the Community will contribute to a prudent, sustainable and rational utilisation of natural resources and promote measures at international level to deal with world-wide environmental problems."
To je očitno sklicevanje na okoljsko politiko, ki je v členu 3(1) Pogodbe ES omenjena kot ena od dejavnosti Skupnosti ("politika na področju okolja").
This is a clear reference to environment policy, which is mentioned in Article 3(l) of the EC Treaty as one of the activities of the Community ("a policy in the sphere of the environment").
Poleg tega se člen 1 predlagane direktive nanaša na "upravljanje s prosto živečimi živalskimi vrstami, obvladovanje škodljivih organizmov, lov sesalcev za ohranjanje", člen 6 pa na "doselitev, ponovno naselitev, gojitev ali varstvo živalskih in rastlinskih vrst", ki so prav tako vidiki politike na področju okolja.
Furthermore, Article 1 of the proposed directive refers to "wildlife management, pest control, capture of mammals for conservation" and Article 6 to "repopulation, reintroduction, breeding or ... the protection of fauna and flora", which are also aspects of a policy in the sphere of the environment.
Zato je osrednji del predlagane direktive okoljska politika, člen 175(1) pa je edina primerna pravna podlaga, saj državam članicam dovoljuje tudi sprejetje strožjih pravil na podlagi člena 176 pod pogojem, da so ta pravila združljiva s Pogodbo, kar je v skladu z namenom predlagane direktive.
Consequently, the centre of gravity of the proposed directive is environment policy and Article 175(1) constitutes the only appropriate legal basis, bearing in mind also that it allows Member States to adopt stricter rules on the basis of Article 176 on the condition that such rules are compatible with the Treaty, which is consistent with the purpose of the proposed directive.
Odbor za pravne zadeve se je tako na seji 6. oktobra 2005 soglasno odločil
At its meeting of 6 October 2005 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, by a unanimous vote
Pri glasovanju so bili navzoči: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Antonio López-Istúriz White (pripravljavec osnutka), Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine (za Piio-Nooro Kauppi), Jean-Paul Gauzčs (za Rainerja Wielanda), Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega (za Antonia Masipa Hidalga), Aloyzas Sakalas in Jaroslav Zvěřina. , da priporoči ohranitev člena 175(1) Pogodbe ES kot edine pravne podlage.
The following were present for the vote: Giuseppe Gargani (chairman), Antonio López-Istúriz White (draftsman), Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine (for Piia-Noora Kauppi), Jean-Paul Gauzès (for Rainer Wieland), Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega (for Antonio Masip Hidalgo), Aloyzas Sakalas and Jaroslav Zvěřina. , to recommend that you retain Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty as the sole legal basis.
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o standardih humanega lova nekaterih živalskih vrst s pastmi
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing humane trapping standards for certain animal species
člena 251(2) in 175 (1) ES
Articles 251(2) and 175 (1) EC
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju v skladu s členom 183,3(2)
Substitutes under Rule 183.3 present for the final vote
o pravni ureditvi in trgih evropskih elektronskih komunikacij 2004
on European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................15
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................15
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije, z naslovom "Pravna ureditev in trgi evropskih elektronskih komunikacij 2004" ( KOM(2004)0759 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission, entitled 'European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2004' ( COM(2004)0759 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 22. in 23. marca 2005,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 22 and 23 March 2005,
– ob upoštevanju poročila skupine izvedencev o lizbonski strategiji novembra 2004,
– having regard to the report of the High-Level Group on the Lisbon Strategy of November 2004,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. novembra 2003 o osmem poročilu Komisije o izvajanju normativnega okvira za telekomunikacije,
– having regard to its resolution of 18 November 2003 on the eighth report from the Commission on the implementation of the telecommunications regulatory package
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. februarja 2003 o načinih splošnega uvajanja mobilnih komunikacij tretje generacije,
– having regard to its resolution of 12 February 2003 on the full roll-out of third generation mobile communications
– ob upoštevanju direktive 2002/19/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju (Direktiva o dostopu),
– having regard to Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive)
– ob upoštevanju direktive 2002/20/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev (Direktiva o odobritvi dovoljenja)
– having regard to Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive)
– ob upoštevanju direktive 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (Okvirna direktiva),
– having regard to Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)
– ob upoštevanju direktive 2002/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah),
– having regard to Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive)
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Lizboni z dne 23. in 24. marca 2000,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Lisbon of 23 and 24 March 2000,
- ob upoštevanju Sklepa Komisije z dne 29. julija 2002 o ustanovitvi Evropske skupine regulatornih organov za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve,
– having regard to the Commission Decision of 29 July 2002 establishing the European Regulators Group for Electronic Communications Networks and Services,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0305/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0305/2005 ),
A. ker se postopki za prevzem in izvajanje med državami članicami razlikujejo, in ker te razlike ovirajo nastanek resnično enotnega trga elektronskih komunikacij,
A. whereas the procedures for transposing and implementing Community law vary from one Member State to the next, a situation which is jeopardising the completion of a genuine single market in electronic communications,
B. ker Komisija igra osrednjo vlogo pri izvajanju in pravilni uporabi regulativnega okvira,
B. whereas the Commission plays a central role in the implementation and proper application of the regulatory framework,
C. ker v primeru kršitev Komisija lahko sproži postopke proti državam članicam, ki ne izvajajo predpisov ali ki jih izvajajo nepravilno,
C. whereas the Commission may initiate infringement proceedings against Member States which fail to apply the legislation or do so incorrectly,
D. ker Komisija, po postopku iz člena 7 Okvirne direktive, oceni ukrepe, ki jih nacionalni regulativni organi nameravajo izvajati,
D. whereas, under the procedure described in Article 7 of the Framework Directive, the Commission assesses the measures which national regulatory authorities (NRAs) plan to take,
E. ker ta določba nudi regulativnemu organu prožno sredstvo in mu omogoča, da poseže na trg, kadar je ogrožena prosta konkurenca,
E. whereas this provision serves as a flexible instrument enabling the regulator to intervene in the market where the free play of competition may be under threat,
F. ker so ti vidiki Uredbe dragocena možnost, ki omogoča regulativnemu organu, da pravilno posega na razvijajoč se trg, kjer najnovejše tehnološke inovacije omogočajo zagotavljanje novih storitev za stranke,
F. whereas these aspects of regulation are valuable in enabling the regulator to intervene correctly in an evolving market where recent technological innovation will make it possible to provide new services for consumers,
G. ker ta regulativni sistem omogoča prilagajanje izvajanja izboljšav na podlagi načela sorazmernosti in zmanjšanje regulativnih obremenitev, ko konkurenčni trendi na trgu upravičujejo tako dejavnost,
G. whereas this regulatory system makes it possible to adjust the application of remedies on the basis of the principle of proportionality, and to scale down the regulatory burdens when competition trends in the market justify doing so,
H. ker se nacionalni regulativni organi neodvisno odločajo za posege na trg in ker se pri tem ravnajo po merilu sorazmernosti glede na zastavljene cilje,
H. whereas NRAs decide quite independently to intervene in the markets and whereas the criterion on which such intervention is based is that it should be proportionate to the objectives pursued,
I. ker so pritožbeni postopki proti odločitvam nacionalnih regulativnih organov dolgotrajni in ker imajo v nekaterih državah članicah pritožbeni postopki zoper odločitve nacionalnih regulativnih organov redno odložilni učinek,
I. whereas the procedure for appeals against NRA decisions is a lengthy one, and whereas in some Member States these decisions are systematically suspended pending the outcome of the appeal,
J. ker zamude pri izvajanju in analizah trga predstavljajo veliko oviro pri vzpostavitvi enotnega trga elektronskih komunikacij in ustvarijo tako med podjetji v različnih državah članicah različne pogoje dela in negotovost glede tega, kateri regulativni pristop uporabiti v prehodnem obdobju,
J. whereas the delays in implementation and market analysis are a serious obstacle to the creation of a single market in electronic communications, creating different operating conditions for companies in the various Member States and uncertainties as regards the regulatory approach adopted during the transitional period,
K. ker jasno opredeljen pravni okvir ustvarja take pogoje, ki vzpodbujajo operaterje k novim investicijam, to pa je nujno, da bi lahko evropska industrija elektronskih komunikacij prevzela mednarodno vodilno vlogo,
K. whereas a clear regulatory framework will create the conditions to encourage operators to make further investments, and whereas this is vital to enable the European electronic communications industry to play a leadership role in the international arena,