natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če se Skupnost ne bo odzvala, se lahko zgodi, da bodo ladje Skupnosti začele pluti pod drugimi zastavami (v večini primerov pod zastavami ugodnosti), kar bo povzročilo zmanjšanje obsega flote Skupnosti.
If the Community does not act, then Community vessels might change flags (mostly to flags of convenience), thereby reducing the size of the Community fleet.
Glede na to, da se je Skupnost obvezala k spoštovanju mednarodnih dogovorov glede trajnostnega upravljanja z viri in boju proti nezakonitem ribolovu, je zaželeno, da se ohranijo partnerski sporazumi na področju ribištva, zlasti z državami v razvoju.
Given that the Community has made international commitments regarding the sustainable management of resources and combating illegal fishing, it is desirable to maintain fisheries partnership agreements, particularly with developing countries.
Pričakuje se, da bo s tem podaljšanjem São Tomé in Príncipe pripravljen skleniti nov sporazum o ribolovu, ki bo zadovoljil interese obeh strani in ki bi moral začeti veljati 1. julija 2006.
It is hoped that, with this extension, São Tomé e Príncipe will be ready to negotiate a new fisheries agreement which will meet the interests of both parties, and which should enter into force on 1 July 2006.
Zopet se je zgodilo, da je bil Evropski parlament zaprošen, da poda svoje mnenje o sporazumu o ribolovu/podaljšanju sporazuma, šele po preteku roka za plačilo finančnega prispevka.
Yet again, the European Parliament has been asked for its opinion on a fisheries agreement/extension to an agreement when the date for payment of the financial contribution has already passed.
Evropski parlament želi Komisijo opozoriti na to dejstvo.
Parliament draws the Commission’s attention to this fact.
Komisija predlaga zgolj enoletno podaljšanje prejšnjega protokola s São Toméjem in Príncipom, ki je potekel 31. maja 2005.
The proposal from the Commission is for a simple extension by one year of the previous protocol with São Tomé and Príncipe, which expired on 31 May 2005.
V zameno za 637.500 EUR finančnega nadomestila daje vlada São Toméja in Príncipa pravice dostopa 36 španskim in francoskim plovilom za ribolov tuna z zapornimi plavaricami, 25 španskim in portugalskim plovilom s površinskimi parangali in 2 portugalskima ploviloma za ribolov tunov z ribiško palico.
For a financial compensation of €637.500 the government of São Tomé and Príncipe gives access rights to 36 Spanish and French tuna purse seiners, 25 Spanish and Portuguese surface longliners and 2 Portuguese pole-and-line tuna vessels.
Ta plovila bodo smela uloviti 8.500 ton tuna, za ulov nad to količino pa bodo morala dodatno plačati.
These vessels will be allowed to catch 8.500 tonnes of tuna, with, as usual, catches over and above that amount requiring additional payments.
EU mora plačati tudi 50.000 EUR za znanstveno oceno virov globokomorske rakovice.
The EU must also pay €50.000 for a scientific survey of deep-water crab.
Komisija navaja dva razloga za svoj predlog podaljšanja namesto sklenitve novega protokola za daljše obdobje.
The Commission provides two reasons for proposing an extension rather than a new protocol for a longer period.
Prvič, vladi São Toméja in Príncipa je treba dati več časa za priprave na pogajanja o novem partnerskem sporazumu.
The first is to give more time to the government of São Tomé and Príncipe to prepare for negotiating a new partnership agreement.
Glede na to, da obstajajo pomembne razlike med starimi sporazumi o ribolovu in novimi partnerskimi sporazumi o ribolovu, je razumljivo, da bi se vlada želela dobro pripraviti, da bo lahko zagovarjala svoje interese.
Given that there are certain significant differences between the old fisheries agreements and the new fisheries partnership agreements, it is understandable that the government would want to prepare itself well so as to be able to defend its interests.
Drugi razlog pa zahteva tehtnejši premislek.
The second is rather more intriguing.
Komisija opozarja na potrebo po " ureditvi nekaterih vprašanj o izvajanju Protokola za obdobje 2002–2005 ", a ne navaja nobenih podrobnosti o tem, katera vprašanja bi to lahko bila.
The Commission refers to the need to “ iron out certain difficulties relating to the implementation of the 2002-5 protocol ” but provides no details as to what those difficulties might have been.
Glede na vrsto "vprašanj" bi bilo morda bolj smiselno začasno prekiniti ribolovne dejavnosti.
Depending on what those “difficulties” were, it might have been more prudent to suspend fishing activities.
Po reformi odnosa EU do sporazumov o ribolovu Komisija sedaj svetovalcem nalaga, da ocenijo njihov vpliv.
Following the reform of the EU’s approach to fisheries agreements, the Commission now engages consultants to provide an evaluation of the impact of agreements.
Ocena sporazuma s São Toméjem in Príncipom kaže na probleme, s katerimi se sooča ta država.
The evaluation for the agreement with São Tomé and Príncipe gives some idea of the problems faced by the country.
Nekaj sklepnih ugotovitev skupne ocene:
Among the conclusions of the summary evaluation:
Ribiška politika São Toméja in Príncipa je slabo opredeljena in se ne razvija .
Fisheries policy in São Tomé and Príncipe is only weakly defined and stagnant .
Sposobnost za razvoj politike in posvetovalni mehanizmi ne obstajajo .
Policy development capacity and consultative mechanisms are non-existent .
Spodobnost izvajanja glede informiranja in raziskav na področju ribištva, nacionalni razvoj ribištva, nadzor in spremljanje ter higienski inšpekcijski pregledi so tako neučinkoviti, da so naravnost zanemarljivi .
Implementation capacity in terms of fisheries information and research, national fisheries development, fisheries management, monitoring control and surveillance and hygiene inspection are weak to the point of irrelevance .
Po tej oceni so z vidika proračuna glavna problematična področja, povezana z izvajanjem protokola, sledeča:
According to the evaluation, the principal problem areas associated with the execution of the protocol from a budgetary point of view include:
– izredno slaba sposobnost organov São Toméja in Príncipa za črpanje sredstev za namenske ukrepe, za izvajanje ukrepov in utemeljevanje odhodkov;
extremely weak capacity on the part of the São Toméan authorities to absorb targeted action funds, implement measures and account for expenditure;
– pomanjkanje ustreznega proračunskega nadzora v zvezi s finančnimi prispevki.
lack of proper budgetary controls relating to the financial contributions.
Svetovalci so prav tako zelo zaskrbljeni glede posledic, ki jih bo povzročila flota plovil EU za ribolov s površinskimi parangali, zlasti za nekatere izlovljene vrste morskega psa in hudo ogrožene morske želve.
The consultants also express serious concerns about the impact of the EU surface longline fleet, especially on certain depleted shark species and critically endangered sea turtles.
Ker se pri tej floti pojavljajo " poročila o nezadostnem ulovu in vloženem naporu ", se zastavlja vprašanje, zakaj naj bi še vedno izkoriščala subvencioniran dostop do voda São Toméja in Príncipa.
Since this fleet demonstrates “ very poor catch and effort reporting ”, one has to wonder why they should continue to benefit from subsidized access to the waters of São Tomé and Príncipe.
Na koncu je komajda mogoče trditi, da sporazum s São Toméjem in Príncipom gladko in brez težav funkcionira.
In conclusion, it can hardly be claimed that the agreement with São Tomé and Príncipe is smooth-running and problem free.
Svetovalci so podali številna priporočila, med njimi tudi priporočila z vidika proračuna, in sicer da:
The consultants make a number of recommendations, including ones of a budgetary nature:
– je treba zagotoviti tehnično pomoč za krepitev institucij (predlagan je logični okvir za takšen poseg);
providing technical assistance for institutional strengthening (a logical framework for such an intervention is proposed);
– je treba zmanjšati obseg ali ukiniti floto plovil s površinskimi parangali (kljub temu, da svarijo pred zgolj umikom flote iz voda São Toméja in njeni premestitvi drugam);
reduction or elimination of the surface longline fleet (although they warn against simply eliminating the fleet from São Tomé waters and displacing it elsewhere);
– je bolje, da se celotno finančno plačilo v okviru naslednjega protokola opravi v obliki finančnega nadomestila kot pa za namenske ukrepe.
making the entire financial payment under the next protocol as financial compensation rather than including targeted measures.
Svetovalci so svojo oceno podali septembra 2004, veliko pred sklenitvijo prejšnjega protokola.
The consultants delivered their evaluation in September 2004, long before the conclusion of the previous protocol.
Upati je, da bosta Komisija in vlada São Toméja in Príncipa v polnosti izrabili zelo dragocene informacije, vključene v oceno.
It is to be hoped that the Commission and the government of São Tomé and Príncipe make full use of the very valuable information included in the evaluation.
Odbor za proračun poziva Odbor za ribištvo kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoje poročilo vključi naslednji predlog spremembe:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendment in its report:
UL C/ Še neobjavljeno v UL.
OJ C .
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poroča o rezultatih namenskih ukrepov, opisanih v členu 4 protokola.
The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the results of the targeted actions described in Article 4 of the Protocol.
Da bi lahko ocenili, ali se finančni prispevek, ki ga plačuje EU, ustrezno utemeljen in ali dejansko spodbuja trajnostni rabo ribolovnih virov São Toméja in Príncipa, mora Komisija Parlamentu predložiti poročilo.
In order to evaluate whether the compensation paid by the EU is properly accounted for and does in fact promote the sustainable use of fishery resources São Tomé and Príncipe, the Commission should report to Parliament
Predlog uredbe Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem o podaljšanju veljavnosti Protokola o možnostih ribolova in finančnem prispevku, določenih s Sporazumom med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in vlado Demokratične republike São Tomé in Príncipe o ribolovu od obale São Toméja in Príncipa za obdobje od 1. junija 2005 do 31. maja 2006
Proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters extending the Protocol setting out, for the period 1 June 2005 to 31 May 2006, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe on fishing off the coast of São Tomé e Príncipe
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem o podaljšanju veljavnosti Protokola o možnostih ribolova in finančnem prispevku, določenih s Sporazumom med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in vlado Demokratične republike São Tomé in Príncipe o ribolovu od obale São Toméja in Príncipa za obdobje od 1. junija 2005 do 31. maja 2006.
on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters extending the Protocol setting out, for the period 1 June 2005 to 31 May 2006, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe on fishing off the coast of São Tomé e Príncipe
Vsi sporazumi o ribolovu, ki jih je Evropska unija podpisala s tretjimi državami, morajo upoštevati integrirani okvir partnerskih sporazumov na področju ribolova, ki jih je Komisija sprejela leta 2002, in o katerem je Parlament oblikoval mnenje, sprejeto leta 2003.
All fisheries agreements signed by the European Union with third countries must follow the integrated framework for fisheries partnership agreements adopted by the Commission in 2002, on which Parliament delivered an opinion in October 2003.
Tudi če gre v pričujočem primeru za podaljšanje sporazuma o ribolovu, podpisanega pred začetkom veljavnosti okvirnega sporazuma, bi Komisija morala pristop, vgrajen v novi tip sporazumov, če je le mogoče, upoštevati.
Even if the present case involves the extension of a fisheries agreement signed before the framework agreement came into force, the philosophy behind the new type of agreements should be taken into account by the Commission wherever possible.
Politika gospodarskega sodelovanja Unije in skupna politika ribolova (CFP) se morata dopolnjevati ter biti povezani in usklajeni, da bi lahko prispevali k zmanjšanju revščine in trajnostnemu razvoju.
The Union's development cooperation policy and the common fisheries policy (CFP) must be consistent, complementary and coordinated, contributing together to poverty reduction and to sustainable development.
Evropska unija se je zavzela za zagotovitev trajnostnega ribolova v svetovnem merilu, tako kot je bilo določeno na vrhu v Johannesburgu, s tem pa za ohranjanje in obnavljanje ribolovnih virov.
The EU has committed itself to ensuring the sustainable character of fisheries worldwide, as defined at the Johannesburg summit, by maintaining or restoring stock levels.
Podpisala je kodeks odgovornega ribištva Organizacije OZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO).
The EU has signed the FAO 'Code of Conduct for responsible fisheries'.
Prisotnost Evropske unije v oddaljenih ribolovnih conah je zakonit cilj – interese Unije na področju ribolova je potrebno zaščititi, istočasno pa bdeti nad razvojem držav, s katerimi so ti sporazumi podpisani.
The EU presence in distant fishing grounds is a legitimate objective and the Union's fisheries interests should be protected, whilst at the same time focusing on the development of the nations with which agreements are signed.
Protokol zagotavlja možnosti ribolova za plovila za ribolov tunov s potegalkami španskega in francoskega porekla, plovila za ribolov tunov z ribiško palico iz Portugalske in plovila s površinskimi parangali iz Španije in Portugalske.
The protocol grants fishing opportunities for tuna seiners from Spain and France, pole-and-line tuna vessels from Portugal and surface longliners from Spain and Portugal.
Finančni prispevek je določen na 637.500 EUR na leto in zajema skupno 8500 ton tunov.
The financial contribution has been set at EUR 637 500 for the year and covers a total of 8500 tonnes of tuna.
Skupnost bo poleg tega v tem letu za financiranje ocenjevalne študije o viru globokomorske rakovice namenila 50.000 EUR.
The European Union is also providing EUR 50 000 to fund an assessment study on deep-water crab stocks.
Zelo priporočamo ukrepe, katerih cilj je financiranje projektov, ki jih lokalne infrastrukture namenjajo predelavi in trženju rib, kar bi obalnemu prebivalstvu omogočilo preseči ribolov, namenjen zgolj preživljanju.
We advocate targeted measures to finance local infrastructure projects for fish processing and marketing, which will enable coastal communities to progress beyond subsistence fishing.
Ko se podaljšani sporazum izteče, je potreben posvet s Parlamentom.
Parliament has been consulted at a time when the extension to the agreement is coming to an end.
Odbor za razvoj bo svoje mnenje izglasoval marca, Odbor za ribištvo kot pristojni odbor pa se bo o tem izrekel mesec dni zatem.
The Committee on Development will vote on its opinion in March, and the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, will hold its vote the following month.
Tako bo Komisija prejela mnenje Parlamenta šele mesec dni pred iztekom podaljšanega obdobja maja 2006.
This means that Parliament's opinion will not reach the Commission until one month before the end of the extension, in May 2006.
Parlament ne sme brez ugovora dopuščati odkrito neupoštevanje svojih pristojnosti.
Parliament cannot allow its powers to be openly flouted without protest.
Svet bi se moral v zvezi s pooblastilom za pogajanja, ki ga daje Komisiji, posvetovati z našo institucijo, Komisija pa bi nas morala o poteku pogajanj obveščati.
Our Institution should be consulted on the negotiating mandate given to the Commission by the Council, and the Commission should keep it informed of the progress of the negotiations.
Vsak odlog v postopku posvetovanja bi moral biti pojasnjen in utemeljen.
Any delay in the consultation process should be explained and justified.
Parlament trenutne situacije na področju sporazumov o ribolovu s tretjimi državami ne more sprejeti.
Parliament cannot accept the present situation with regard to fisheries agreements with third countries.
Posvetovanje z njim mora imeti svoj smisel in njegove pristojnosti se morajo spoštovati.
Consulting Parliament must be a meaningful exercise, and the procedure must be carried out in such a way that its powers are respected.
Med pristojnimi odbori in Evropskim parlamentom, Komisijo in Svetom se mora vzpostaviti dialog, da bi odpravili ovire, ki preprečujejo nemoten potek postopka posvetovanja na področju sporazumov o ribolovu.
A dialogue must be opened up between the competent committees of the European Parliament, the Commission and the Council with the aim of removing the stumbling blocks to the smooth running of the consultation procedure for fisheries agreements.
Odbori, zaprošeni za menje Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
Poenostavljeni postopek - Datum sklepa
Simplified procedure – date of decision Date of decision
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o odpovedi Sporazuma med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Vlado Ljudske republike Angole o ribolovu v obalnih vodah Angole in o odstopanju od Uredbe (ES) št. 2792/1999
on the proposal for a Council regulation denouncing the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the People’s Republic of Angola on fisheries off Angola and derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUN .......................................................................................9
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS...................................................................9
MNENJE ODBORA ZA RAZVOJ ...........................................................................................12
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT......................................................12
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Sveta ( KOM(2005)0677 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation ( COM(2005)0677 )
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty ,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0035/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0035/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo in mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A6-0133/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0133/2006 ),
Po dveh krogih uradnih pogajanj in številnih stikih med Komisijo in angolskimi oblastmi ni bilo mogoče doseči dogovora o obnovitvi protokola, priloženega Sporazumu o možnostih ribolova in finančnem prispevku, predvidenih v Sporazumu med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Ljudsko republiko Angolo o ribolovu v obalnih vodah Angole za obdobje od 3. avgusta 2002 do 2. avgusta 2004.
After two rounds of formal negotiations and various contacts between the Commission and the Angolan authorities, it has not been possible to reach an agreement on the renewal of the protocol annexed to the Agreement setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People’s Republic of Angola on fishing off Angola for the period between 3 August 2002 and 2 August 2004.
Zato je Komisija junija 2005 angolske oblasti obvestila, da je začasno prekinila pogajanja in da je po njenem mnenju treba formalno odpovedati sporazum o ribolovu.
Consequently, the Commission informed the Angolan authorities in June 2005 that it was suspending negotiations and that, in its view, it was considered necessary to formally denounce the fisheries agreement.
Razlogi za odpoved sporazuma, ki jih je navedla Komisija, so povezani z določenimi pogoji iz novega angolskega pravnega okvira o bioloških vodnih virih, ki veljajo za nezdružljive z zahtevami Skupnosti glede ribolova ribiških plovil Skupnosti v angolskih vodah v okviru sporazuma o ribolovu s Skupnostjo.
The reasons put forward by the Commission in proposing that the agreement be denounced relate to certain conditions laid down in the new Angolan legislative framework on biological aquatic resources, which are considered to be incompatible with the Community’s requirements in terms of fishing by Community fishing vessels in Angolan waters within the framework of a fisheries agreement with the Community.
Nov pravni okvir, ki ga je Ljudska republika Angola sprejela oktobra 2004, določa, da je treba ribolovne dejavnosti, ki so predmet sporazuma med Skupnostjo in Angolo, odslej opravljati v skladu z angolskimi zakoni in predpisi o ribolovu.
The new legislative framework adopted by the People’s Republic of Angola in October 2004 lays down that the fishing activities subject to an agreement between the Community and Angola must henceforth be carried out in conformity with Angola’s laws and regulations on fisheries.
V skladu z novim zakonom o bioloških vodnih virih, ki ga je sprejela Ljudska republika Angola, je treba vse ribolovne dejavnosti opravljati skupaj z angolskimi podjetji, ribe pa morajo biti angolskega izvora.
In accordance with the new law on biological aquatic resources adopted by the People’s Republic of Angola, all fishing activities must be carried out in association with Angolan enterprises and the fish must be of Angolan origin.
Poleg tega bi morala biti vsa plovila Skupnosti opremljena s satelitskimi sledilnimi napravami, ki bi bile neposredno povezane z angolskim centrom za spremljanje ribiških plovil.
Furthermore, all Community vessels would have to be fitted with satellite tracking devices directly linked to the Angolan fishing vessel monitoring centre.
Skupnost bo morala Ljudsko republiko Angolo o odpovedi sporazuma o ribolovu obvestiti do 31. oktobra 2007, da bo odpoved začela veljati 1. februarja 2008.
The Community will need to give notice to the People’s Republic of Angola of the denouncement of the fisheries agreement by 31 October 2007 so that the denunciation takes effect on 1 February 2008.
Odpoved sporazuma bo prizadela številna ribiška plovila iz držav Skupnosti, ki so opravljala svojo dejavnost na podlagi tega sporazuma.
The denunciation of the agreement will affect a number of fishing vessels from Community countries which used to operate under this agreement.
POLOŽAJ PRIZADETIH PLOVIL IN PREDLAGANA ODSTOPANJA
SITUATION FOR THE VESSELS AFFECTED AND DEROGATIONS PROPOSED
Število ribiških plovil iz držav Skupnosti, ki jih zadeva odpoved sporazuma in ki so do sedaj opravljala dejavnost izključno ali predvsem v vodah Angole, po ocenah znaša okrog 21, od katerih je 19 močno odvisnih od ribolova v teh vodah.
The number of fishing vessels from Community countries affected by the denunciation of the agreement, which have until now operated exclusively or principally in Angolan waters, has been assessed at around 21, 19 of which were considered highly dependent on fishing in these waters.