natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija predlaga določitev končnega datuma za uporabo fotografij od leta 2005 do leta 2007 in hkrati od držav članic zahteva, da vključijo biometrične identifikatorje v vizume in dovoljenja za bivanje za državljane tretjih držav.
The Commission proposes to bring forward the final date for the implementation of the photograph from 2007 to 2005 and at the same time to require Member States to integrate biometric identifiers into the visa and the residence permit for third country nationals.
V praksi to pomeni: državljani tretjih držav, ki zaprosijo za vizum na francoskem konzulatu v Rabatu, bodo slikani (ali sami prinesejo sliko, ki je dovolj kvalitetna, da omogoča skeniranje) odvzeta pa jim bosta tudi dva prstna odtisa.
In practical terms for the visa this would mean: A third country national applying for a visa in the French consulate in Rabat will have his picture (or he brings a picture of good quality that can be scanned) and two fingerprints taken.
Slika bo vključena v vizum.
The picture will figure on the visa.
Slika in prstni odtisi bodo shranjeni na mikročipu na samem vizumu.
The picture and the fingerprints will be stored on a microchip on the visa itself.
Ti podatki bodo hranjeni na državni ravni.
This data will be kept on a national level.
Oseba nato potuje v EU.
The person then travels to the EU.
Ob vstopni točki je uradnik mejne straže opremljen s tehnično opremo, ki omogoča branje čipa: na računalniškem zaslonu se prikaže slika osebe, posneta v Rabatu.
At the border entry point the border guard has the technical equipment to read the chip: on his computer screen he will see the picture of the person taken in Rabat.
Najprej lahko vizualno primerja sliko osebe na vizumu in osebe, ki stoji pred njim.
In a first step he can visually compare the picture with the person in front of him and the picture printed on the visa.
Če podvomi v istovetnost osebe, lahko primerja prstne odtise prisotne osebe in odtise, shranjene na mikročipu.
If he has doubts whether they are identical, in a second step the fingerprints on the chip and of the person present can be compared.
Poročevalec se na splošno strinja z obema predlogoma, kot je npr. uporaba biometrije za večjo varnost izdanih vizumov in dovoljenj za bivanje.
The rapporteur generally agrees with the intention of the two proposals, i.e. the use of biometrics to strengthen the security of issued visas and residence permits.
Biometrija omogoča zanesljivo povezavo med osebo in dokumentom, in tako rešuje dve pogosti težavi: najprej, uporaba biometrije bo preprečila vstop na ozemlje EU pod lažno identiteto (npr. z uporabo potnega lista druge osebe).
Biometrics enables a reliable link between a person and a document to be established, thereby solving two increasingly frequent problems: firstly, the use of biometrics will make it almost impossible to enter the territory of the EU with a false identity (i.e. using the passport of another person).
Mejni uradniki se čedalje pogosteje soočajo z naraščajočim problemom podobnosti oseb..
Border officials today are increasingly confronted with the problem of "look alikes".
Celo zelo usposobljen mejni uradnik ima včasih težave pri zanesljivem ugotavljanju identitete oseb iz drugih kulturnih območij.
It is for example very difficult even for a well trained border guard to identify with certainty people from other cultural areas.
Poleg tega je iskanje, ki temelji na alfanumeričnih podatkih (na primer imenih), postalo izjemno nezanesljivo.
Secondly, searches based only on alphanumeric data (for example names) become increasingly unreliable.
Današnji mejni nadzor lahko omogoča na primer iskanje v schengenskem informacijskem sistemu točno takrat, ko oseba zaprosi za vizum in seveda tudi v trenutku, ko vstopi na ozemlje EU.
Today's border control scenario can provide for example for a check in the Schengen Information System (SIS) at the moment of application for a visa and at the moment of entry.
Trenutno poteka to iskanje, na primer iskanje podatka, ali neka oseba lahko vstopi na schengensko ozemlje, poimensko.
Currently this search, for example to check whether a person is not allowed to enter the Schengen territory, is usually made with the name.
Vendar vseeno obstaja veliko splošnih imen, pa tudi različnih črkovanj enakega imena, odvisno od uporabljenih pravil za prečrkovanje.
There are, however, many common names and as well different spellings of the same name depending on the transliteration rules used.
Posledično je ne le veliko težje pravilno identificirati osebo, ampak je tudi veliko bolj pogosto napačno identificiranje osebe, kar lahko pripelje do resnih težav.
It is consequently not only more and more difficult to identify a person correctly but also more and more common to wrongly identify a person for somebody he or she is not with the latter leading sometimes to serious problems for those persons.
Zaradi teh prednosti vidi poročevalec tri različne težave, ki jih je treba rešiti: zaščita zasebnosti in osebnih podatkov, razmerje trenutnih predlogov za enotno obliko vizumov in razvoj informacijskega sistema Visa (VIS) ter trenutnega izvajanja predlogov za vizume.
Against these advantages the rapporteur sees three main problematic issues which need to be addressed: privacy and data protection, the relationship of the present proposal on the uniform format for visas with the development of the Visa Information System (VIS), and the actual implementation of the proposal on the visa.
Delovna skupina je, kot je navedeno v členu 29, v mnenju o dveh predlogih
As expressed by the Article 29 Working Party in its opinion on the two proposals under consideration
Mnenje št. 7/2004 o vključevanju biometričnih elementov v dovoljenja za bivanje in vizume, ob upoštevanju ustanovitve Evropskega informacijskega sistema Visa (VIS), sprejeto 11. avgusta 2004, DS 96. predlagala uporabo biometrije, ki „bo imela verjetno velik vpliv na osnovne pravice zadevnih oseb“. (stran 3) Poročevalec meni, da je treba izvesti vse ustrezne ukrepe za zagotavljanje potrjevanja takšnih pravic.
Opinion No 7/2004 on the inclusion of biometric elements in residence permits and visas taking account of the establishment of the European information system on visas (VIS) adopted on 11 August 2004, WP 96. the use of biometrics is "likely to have a major impact on the fundamental rights of the persons concerned." (page 3) The rapporteur is of the opinion that all necessary action must be taken to ensure that such rights are upheld.
Mnenje vsebuje več priporočil za teme, ki jih podpira poročevalec.
The opinion contains a series of recommendations to this end that the rapporteur supports.
Pričakuje, da jih bodo upoštevale tudi druge institucije.
He expects the other institutions to follow them as well.
Poročevalec prav tako meni, da ne bi smeli izključiti tehnologije, ki ne temelji na čipih.
The rapporteur also considers that other, non-chip technologies should not be excluded.
Zahvaljujoč tehnološkemu napredku obstaja možnost, da bi bila uporaba čipov odvečna tako z varnostnega kot tudi s stroškovnega vidika.
Thanks to technological progress there are even solutions which would make the use of chips superfluous from both the security and the cost point of view.
Ta predlog o enotni obliki vizumov je tesno povezan z razvojem sistema VIS.
The present proposal on the uniform format for visas is closely linked to the development of the VIS.
Sistem VIS je sistem za izmenjavo podatkov o vizumih med državami članicami in temelji na tehnični platformi schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II).
The VIS will be a system for the exchange of visa data between Member States on a common technical platform with the Schengen Information System II (SIS II).
Do sedaj so ga oblikovali sklepi Evropskega sveta in Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve, krovni dokument pa so oblikovali Sklepi Sveta o razvoju informacijskega sistema Visa (VIS) z dne, 19. februarja 2004.
So far it was shaped by a series of European and JHA Council conclusions, the main document being the Council Conclusions on the development of the Visa Information System (VIS) adopted on 19 February 2004.
Prvi pravni instrument, ki podeljuje mandat za razvoj sistema in omogoča financiranje dela iz proračuna EU, je Svet sprejel 8. junija 2004 (Odločba Sveta 2004/512/ES), kljub zavračanju predloga Komisije s strani Parlamenta
A first legal instrument that gives a mandate for the development of the system and that provides for the financing of this work out of the EU budget was adopted by Council on 8 June 2004 (Council Decision 2004/512/EC) despite Parliament's rejection
Pričakuje se sestava predloga za drugo pravno osnovo, ki bo določala sistem VIS z vsemi elementi in s postopki (namen, vsebina, porabniki itd.).
A proposal for the second legal basis which will define the VIS in all its elements and operations (like purpose, content, users etc.) is expected.
V pismu predsedniku Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve z dne 19. julija 2004 je komisar Vitorino potrdil, da bo predlog temeljil na pravni osnovi in da bo omogočal postopek soodločanja.
In a letter of 19 July 2004 to the chairman of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Commissioner Vitorino confirmed that the proposal will be based on a legal basis providing for the codecision procedure.
Razvoj sistema VIS je v tem okviru najpomembnejši, ker so podatki, ki naj bi bili shranjeni v čipu, ki je del vizuma, pa tudi dodatni podatki (med drugim 10 prstnih odtisov), shranjeni v sistemu VIS, dostop do obeh pa imajo praktično isti organi.
The development of the VIS is of utmost importance in this context since the very same data that is supposed to be stored on the chip integrated into the visa plus additional data (inter alia 10 fingerprints) will as well be stored in the VIS with basically the same authorities having access to both storage mediums.
Poraja pa se vprašanje, zakaj bi bili isti podatki shranjeni na dveh različnih mestih.
The question therefore arises why it should be necessary to store the very same information in two different locations.
Odgovora na to vprašanje zaenkrat še ni, niti v študijah izvedljivosti za sistem VIS.
This question is so far nowhere analysed not even in the VIS feasibility study.
Decentralizirano shranjevanje v čipu brez osrednje zbirke podatkov, je seveda bolj zaželeno z vidika zaščite podatkov prav tako pa omogoča kratek odzivni čas v trenutku pregleda na meji.
The decentralised storage only on a chip without a central database would clearly be preferable from a data protection point of view and it would also have the advantage of a short response time at the moment of the border check.
Na drugi strani pa ni mogoče zanikati potrebe po osrednji zbirki podatkov.
On the other hand, however, the necessity of a central database cannot be denied.
Poročevalec meni, da lahko le osrednja zbirka podatkov prepreči preprodajo vizumov, omogoča preglede ozadja in identifikacijo nedokumentiranih oseb.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that only a central database can serve to prevent visa-shopping, to handle background checks and to identify undocumented persons.
Poleg tega je zbirka potrebna v primeru okvare čipov.
In addition, it is necessary as a back-up in case of chip mal-functions.
Z logičnega vidika je lahko čip lahko le začasna rešitev do ustanovitve sistema VIS.
From a logical point of view the chip can therefore only be regarded as an intermediate solution until the VIS is set up.
V ZDA shranjujejo na primer podatke o vizumih le v osrednji zbirki podatkov.
The US for example stores the visa data only in a central database.
Povezavo s posebnimi podatki določa referenčna številka.
The link to a specific visa and its data is made with a reference number.
Postopek pridobivanja podatkov iz osrednje zbirke podatkov je zelo hiter.
Apparently the process of retrieving the data form the central database goes very fast.
Poročevalec zaradi praktično istih časovnih razporedov obeh projektov sprašuje, ali je uporaba obeh upravičena.
Considering the almost identical timetables of both projects and the costs involved the rapporteur asks whether it is justified to have both.
Poročevalec bi v zvezi s čipom kot začasno rešitvijo rad usmeril pozornost h komentarjem o tehničnih določbah in dejanskem izvajanju v poročilu o predlogu v zvezi s potnimi listi EU, ki so prav tako veljavni v tem okviru.
As regards the chip as an intermediate solution the rapporteur would like to refer to the comments he made about the technical specifications and the actual implementation in his report about the proposal regarding EU passports which are also valid in this context.
Dejansko izvajanje predloga o enotnih oblikah vizumov bo poseben izziv.
The actual implementation of the proposal on the uniform format for visas will be a particular challenge.
Komisija mora še vedno predlagati spremembo skupnih konzularnih navodil, ki bodo med drugim razjasnila postopek odvzema prstnih odtisov.
The Commission still has to make a proposal to change the common consular instructions that will clarify inter alia how the fingerprints will be taken.
Samoumevno je, da je celoten koncept biometrije, sama ideja o ustanovitvi bolj zanesljive povezave med osebo in dokumentom odvisna od kvalitete začetne identifikacije in naslednjega postopka vpisa.
It is self-evident that the whole concept of biometrics, the very idea of establishing a more reliable link between a person and a document, depends on the quality of the initial identification and the following enrolment process.
Do danes izvedeni testi so pokazali zlasti podcenjevanje povezanih stroškov.
Tests conducted so far have shown that in particular the costs involved have been underestimated.
Test Združenega kraljestva v Kolombu je znašal 500.000 GBP za tehnične rešitve, 300.000 GBP za potrebne spremembe in 25.000 GBP vsako leto za tekoče stroške.
A UK test in Colombo cost £500 000 for setting up the technical solution, £300 000 for necessary modifications in the visa section and £25 000 annually as running costs.
S trenutno 3500 konzularnimi mesti držav članic bi bili skupni stroški zelo visoki..
With currently 3500 consular posts of the Member States the absolute total costs would be very high.
Zato je nepredstavljivo, da bi bil predlog Komisije predložen Parlamentu brez spremljevalne ocene stroškov.
Hence it is incomprehensible that the Commission's proposal should reach Parliament with no accompanying estimate of costs.
Prav tako je treba usmeriti pozornost k sistematičnemu postopku jemanja prstih odtisov prosilcem za vizume, ki mora biti vedno izvajan na zelo neoporečen in strokoven način.
Attention should also be drawn to the importance of the systematic process of fingerprinting visa applicants, which should always be carried out in a very correct and professional manner.
Gospodarstvo EU je bilo vedno zelo odprto in če gre verjeti izkušnjam iz ZDA, obstaja zelo velika možnost, da se bo število prosilcev za vizume drastično zmanjšalo.
The EU economy has always been a very open one and if recent experience in the USA is anything to go by, there is a very high risk that the number of visa applications will go down drastically.
Poročevalec podpira za zaključek oba predloga, obenem pa poudarja, da obstaja še veliko praktičnih težav, ki jih je treba rešiti.
To conclude, the rapporteur supports the two proposals while stressing that many practical problems still require a lot of reflection.
Predlog Komisije za uredbo Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 1683/95 o enotni obliki za vizume
Commission proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1683/95 laying down a uniform format for visas
Predlog Komisije za uredbo Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 1683/95 o enotni obliki dovoljenja za prebivanje za državljane tretjih držav
Commission proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1030/2002 laying down a uniform format for residence permits for third-country nationals
o letnem poročilu o delu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2003
on the annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman for the year 2003
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.....................................................3
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...............................................4
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila o delu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2003,
– having regard to the annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman for the year 2003 ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 195 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 195 of the EC Treaty ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 17. novembra 1993
– having regard to its resolution of 17 November 1993
UL C 329, 6.12.1993, str.
OJ C 329, 6.12.1993, p.
132 o demokraciji, preglednosti in subsidiarnosti in medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o postopkih za izvajanje načela subsidiarnosti; predpisih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje nalog varuha človekovih pravic; ureditvah za postopke spravnega odbora v skladu s členom 189b ES in še posebej njenega dela o predpisih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje nalog varuha človekovih pravic,
132. on democracy, transparency and subsidiarity and the Interinstitutional Agreement on procedures for implementing the principle of subsidiarity; the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman' s duties; the arrangements for the proceedings of the Conciliation Committee under Article 189b EC, and, in particular, the part thereof concerning the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties,
– ob upoštevanju svojega Sklepa 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom z dne 9. marca 1994
– having regard to its Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratomof 9 March 1994
– ob upoštevanju člena 43 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju člena 112(1) in člena 195(2) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 112(1) and Rule 195(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0030/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0030/2004 ),
A ker je Listina o temeljnih pravicah sestavni del Pogodbe o evropski ustavi, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel v Bruslju 18. junija 2004,
A. whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights forms part of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, which was adopted in Brussels on 18 June 2004 by the European Council,
B. ker člen 41 (pravica do dobrega upravljanja), Poglavje V (državljanske pravice) Listine določa, da ima vsaka oseba pravico, da institucije in organi Unije njegove ali njene zadeve obravnavajo nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku,
B. whereas Article 41 (Right to good administration) in Chapter V (Citizens’ Rights) of the Charter provides that every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union,
C ker člen 42 Listine določa, da ima vsak državljan Unije in fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic pravico dostopa do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije,
C. whereas Article 42 of the Charter provides that every citizen of the Union and every natural and legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has a right of access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents,
D ker člen 43 (varuh človekovih pravic) Listine določa: ‘vsak državljan Unije ali vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba, ki prebiva ali ima registriran sedež v eni izmed držav članic Unije, lahko obrne na varuha človekovih pravic v zvezi z nepravilnostmi v dejanjih institucij in organov Skupnosti, z izjemo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Sodišča prve stopnje, ko delujeta v svoji pravosodni funkciji’,
D. whereas Article 43 (Ombudsman) of the Charter provides: ‘Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role’,
F ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2003 prejel bistveno povečano število pritožb, nadaljnje povečanje pa se pričakuje tudi po nedavni širitvi,
F. whereas in 2003 there has once again been a substantial increase in the number of complaints addressed to the Ombudsman, and a further increase is expected following the recent enlargement,
G ker je število pritožb varuhu človekovih pravic, kjer so državljani upravičevali razloge za potrebo po večji odprtosti in preglednosti delovanja evropskih institucij, potrebno obravnavati s spoštovanjem do demokratične odgovornosti Unije,
G. whereas the number of complaints to the Ombudsman where citizens have had justified reason to seek a remedy for lack of openness and transparency in the functioning of the European institutions is a matter of concern with respect to the democratic accountability of the Union,
H. ker letno poročilo navaja posamezne primere, kjer ni bilo ugotovljenih nepravilnosti, kjer so se evropske oblasti po seznanitvi s pritožbo strinjale, da se bodo ravnale po priporočilih varuha človekovih pravic ali pa je bila dosežena prijateljska rešitev, toda tudi opozarja na število pritožb, ki jih je varuh človekovih pravic moral zaključiti s kritično pripombo,
H. whereas the Annual Report cites examples of individual cases where no maladministration was found, where European authorities have agreed to comply with the Ombudsman's recommendations once they have been made aware of the complaint, or an amicable solution has been achieved, but also highlights a number of complaints which the Ombudsman has had to close with a critical remark,
I ker je bil varuh človekovih pravic proaktivno dejaven tudi s preiskavami na lastno pobudo,
I. whereas the Ombudsman has also acted proactively by means of own-initiative enquiries,
J ker je Evropski parlament 6. septembra 2001 soglasno sprejel kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev, ki ga je v posebnem poročilu aprila 2000 predlagal varuh človekovih pravic; ker Komisija ni sprejela kodeksa,
J. whereas on 6 September 2001 the European Parliament adopted unanimously the European Union Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, recommended in a Special Report by the Ombudsman in April 2000; whereas the Commission has not adopted the Code,
K ker Pogodba o ustavi za Evropo vsebuje pravno podlago za prihodnji zakon o dobrem upravljanju,
K. whereas the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe contains a legal basis for a future law on good administration,
L ker je varuh človekovih pravic v prispevku k Ustavi 23. januarja 2003 izjavil, da "zamenjava Pogodbe z Ustavo, še posebej z Ustavo, ki vključuje temeljne pravice, zahteva temeljit razmislek o vlogi varuha Pogodbe",
L. whereas, in a contribution submitted on 23 January 2003 to the Convention, the Ombudsman stated that "replacing the Treaty by a Constitution, especially a Constitution that includes fundamental rights, requires profound reflection on the role of the guardian of the Treaty",
M ker je varuh človekovih pravic že v svojem sklepu o pritožbi 995/98/OV poudaril, da medtem ko ima Komisija neomejena pooblastila v zvezi s postopkom za ugotavljanje kršitev, pa le-ta "ima pravne meje, ki jih je vzpostavila sodna praksa Sodišča, ki na primer zahteva, da upravni organi delujejo dosledno in v dobri veri, se izogibajo diskriminaciji, izpolnjujejo načela sorazmernosti, enakosti in legitimnih pričakovanj in spoštujejo človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine",
M. whereas the Ombudsman has emphasised already in his Decision on complaint 995/98/OV that, whilst the Commission enjoys discretionary powers in respect to the opening of infringement procedures, these are nevertheless "subject to legal limits as established by the case law of the Court of Justice, which requires, for example, that administrative authorities should act consistently and in good faith, avoid discrimination, comply with the principles of proportionality, equality and legitimate expectations and respect human rights and fundamental freedoms",