natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Odbor zagotovi redno posvetovanje in sodelovanje s predstavniki ekoloških proizvajalcev in predstavniki potrošnikov s ciljem, da se dosledno izpolnjujejo cilji ekološke pridelave, določeni v členu 3, in sicer s tem, da se jih vključi v posodabljanje in izvajanje ustreznih tehnik v skladu s cilji in načeli, navedenimi v Naslovu II te uredbe.
The Committee shall ensure regular consultation of and cooperation with organic producer representatives and consumer representatives with a view to consistently meeting the objectives of organic production set out in Article 3, involving them in updating and implementing appropriate techniques consistent with the objectives and principles laid down in Title II.
Ker predlog uredbe vsebuje le malo usklajevalnih standardov, bi moral biti za različne ukrepe, sprejete s postopkom komitologije, odgovoren regulativni odbor, ki v proces sprejemanja odločitev vključuje države članice, in ne upravljalni odbor.
Given that this proposal for a regulation contains few harmonisation standards, the various measures to be taken under the comitology procedure should be the responsibility of the regulatory committee, which involves the Member States in the decision-making process, rather than of the management committee.
Za razliko od člena 4 Sklepa 1999/468/ES člen 5 ne vsebuje nobene časovne omejitve.
Unlike Article 4 of Decision 1999/468/EC, Article 5 makes no reference to a time limit.
Odstavek 3 bi bilo treba zato zbrisati.
Paragraph 3 should therefore be deleted.
Udeležba predstavnikov ekoloških kmetovalcev pri sprejemanju odločitev predstavlja resnično izvirno izhodišče in inovacijo, ko gre za uporabo uredbe: najboljša praksa in zanesljive ter preizkušene inovativne metode lahko le izboljšajo sprejemanje odločitev kot celoto, odgovornost za organizacijo tega pa mora prevzeti Komisija.
The participation of organic farmers’ representatives in decision-making constitutes the truly original departure and the innovation where implementation of the regulation is concerned: best practice and tried and tested innovative methods can only enhance decision-making as a whole, which is to be organised under the responsibility of the Commission.
Da bi bila uredba kar se da pregledna, je treba ohraniti priloge k uredbi 2092/91 in kar se da zmanjšati uporabo komitološkega postopka.
In order to make this Regulation as transparent as possible the annexes from Regulation 2092/91 should be maintained, and the comitology procedure should be reduced to a minimum.
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporabljajo členi 5a(1) do (4) in 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5a(1) to (4), and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply.
Regulativni postopek s pregledom Komisiji omogoča uveljavitev dobre upravne prakse ob hkratnem sodelovanju Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
The regulatory procedure with scrutiny allows the Commission sufficient scope for good administrative practice while involving the European Parliament and the Council.
Ni razloga za uvedbo postopka upravljalnega odbora.
There is no reason to introduce a management committee procedure.
Komisija obvesti Evropski parlament o vseh načrtovanih spremembah uredbe prek komitološkega postopka in upošteva stališče Parlamenta v zvezi s tem.
The Commission shall notify the European Parliament of any planned changes to the Regulation through the comitology procedure, and shall take due account of Parliament's position thereon.
Člen 31, odstavek 4
Article 31, paragraph 4
Odbor sprejme svoj poslovnik v skladu s členom 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure pursuant to Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC .
Da bi bila uredba kar se da pregledna, je treba ohraniti priloge k uredbi 2092/91 in kar se da zmanjšati uporabo komitološkega postopka.
In order to make this Regulation as transparent as possible the annexes from Regulation 2092/91 should be maintained, and the comitology procedure should be reduced to a minimum .
(a) podrobna pravila v zvezi s pravili pridelave, predpisanimi v Naslovu III, še zlasti glede specifičnih zahtev in pogojev, ki jih morajo upoštevati kmetje in drugi pridelovalci ekoloških proizvodov;
(a) detailed rules as regards the production rules laid down in Title III, in particular as regards the specific requirements and conditions to be respected by farmers and other producers of organic products;
(a) podrobna pravila v zvezi s pravili pridelave, predpisanimi v Naslovu III, še zlasti glede specifičnih zahtev in pogojev, ki jih morajo upoštevati kmetje in drugi pridelovalci ekoloških proizvodov, vključno s pozitivnimi seznami rastlinskih snovi, dodatkov, predelovalnih pripomočkov in drugih sestavin ;
(a) detailed rules as regards the production rules laid down in Title III, in particular as regards the specific requirements and conditions to be respected by farmers and other producers of organic products, including positive lists concerning crop inputs, additives, processing aids and other ingredients ;
V teh pravilih je treba pozitivne sezname izrecno omeniti.
The positive lists should be explicitly mentioned in these rules.
Ta izraz bi lahko zmedel potrošnike, da bi mislili, da izdelek izvira iz Evropske unije, medtem ko bi dejansko prihajal iz tretje države.
This term may be confusing for consumers, leading them to believe that the product originates in the European Union, whereas it may come from a third country.
Tudi v drugih jezikovnih različicah bi ga bilo treba spremeniti.
It should be changed in the other language versions too.
Protisloven položaj
A paradoxical situation
Čeprav se je ekološka pridelava od sprejetja uredbe 2092/91 izrazito povečala, danes še vedno predstavlja le 1,4 % vseh kmetijskih gospodarstev v 25 državah članicah in 3,6 % kmetijskih zemljišč v uporabi.
Whilst organic production has seen spectacular growth since the adoption of regulation 2092/91, it still only represents 1.4 % of the total number of agricultural holdings in the 25 Member States and 3.6 % of the utilised agricultural area.
Ne glede na to povpraševanje potrošnikov še vedno narašča in se vse bolj zadovoljuje z uvoženimi proizvodi, zato prihaja do vedno novih težav v zvezi z nadzorom, izdajanjem potrdil in označevanjem.
However, consumer demand is continuing to grow and is also increasingly being met by imported products, which poses new problems with regard to inspection, certification and labelling.
Poleg tega so zaradi načela subsidiarnosti, ki velja v kmetijskem razvoju, med državami velike razlike v pomoči, ki jo države članice namenjajo ekološkemu kmetovanju, kar povzroča težave in izkrivljanje konkurence v škodo ekološkim pridelovalcem, ki prejemajo najmanj pomoči.
Moreover, given that the subsidiarity principle applies in rural development, the support provided by Member States to organic farming varies very widely from one country to another, which gives rise to difficult situations and leads to distortion of competition to the detriment of those organic producers who receive the least assistance.
Čeprav vsi zatrjujejo, da želijo razvijati ekološko kmetovanje, ki bo v celoti ustrezalo ciljem trajnostnega razvoja, ki si jih je Evropska unija zastavila z göteborško strategijo, sta se pojavila dva različna pristopa, ki si pogosto nasprotujeta.
In fact, whilst everyone asserts that it is their intention to develop organic farming, which is fully in line with the sustainable development objectives that the European Union has set itself in the Goteborg Agenda , two different approaches have emerged, which are often at odds.
Prvi pristop temelji zlasti na sprejetju jasnih in preprostih standardov, tržnih načelih in lajšanju proste trgovine, drugi pa je usmerjen v ekološko kmetovanje, ki poudarja svoj pomen z regionalnega in družbenokulturnega vidika in v smislu ustvarjanja občutka identitete.
One approach is essentially based on the adoption of clear, simple standards, on market principles and the facilitating of free trade, the other associated with a vision of organic farming which emphasises its importance from a regional and socio-cultural point of view and in terms of creating a sense of identity.
Ne gre pozabiti, da se je sektor razvil po zaslugi odločnega delovanja skupine "pionirjev", ki se je postopoma preoblikovala v samostojne mreže.
It should not be forgotten that the sector has emerged thanks to determined action on the part of a group of 'pioneers', who have gradually formed themselves into autonomous networks.
Potrjevanje, označevanje in sisteme nadzora v ekološkem sektorju se je v veliki meri razvilo s sodelovanjem med kmetovalci in potrošniki.
Certification, labelling and control systems have to a large extent been developed by the organic sector in cooperation between farmers and consumers.
Tako so ustvarili zaupanje, da ekološka proizvodnja obsega okolju prijazne postopke, dobro počutje živali in zdravo hrano in za družbo ne pomeni obremenjujočih stroškov zaradi onesnaževanja okolja in vse večje izgube biološke raznovrstnosti.
They have built the trust that organic production includes environmentally friendly practices, animal welfare and healthy food instead of burdening the costs of environmental pollution and the increasing loss of biodiversity on the society.
Zato se postavlja vprašanje, kako bistveno povečati obseg ekološkega kmetovanja in njegovega deleža pri pridelavi in potrošnji živil, hkrati pa ohraniti njegove posebnosti in zaupanje, ki ga imamo vanj?
The question is therefore: How can organic farming be significantly developed, and its contribution to food production and consumption increased, without destroying its specific features and without undermining the trust which is currently placed in it?
Razlogi za novo uredbo
Why introduce a new regulation?
Junija 2004 je Komisija sprejela evropski akcijski načrt za ekološko hrano in kmetovanje, ki obsega 21 ukrepov za pospeševanje razvoja tega sektorja.
In June 2004 the Commission adopted the European Action Plan for Organic Food and Farming, which set out 21 areas of action designed to facilitate the development of the sector.
Evropski parlament je v svojem mnenju o tem načrtu zahteval zlasti bolj konkretne in bolje financirane ukrepe.
In its opinion on the Action Plan, Parliament called in particular for a commitment to more proactive, better financed measures.
Po mnenju Komisije več ukrepov iz tega načrta predvideva spremembo Uredbe 2092/91, da bi izrecneje določili načela in cilje ekološkega kmetovanja, zavarovali skladnost nadzornega sistema, presegli neučinkovitost notranjega trga, ki jo povzročajo logotipi in standardi posameznih držav in zasebnikov, dokončali in izboljšali standarde ter povečali učinkovitost določb o uvozu.
Several of the actions set out in the plan entail, according to the Commission, making changes to Regulation 2092/91 in order to lay down more explicitly the principles and objectives of organic farming, safeguard the integrity of the inspection system, overcome dysfunctions of the internal market caused by private logos and standards, complete and improve standards and make import provisions more efficient.
Strokovnjaki v tem sektorju in potrošniki so dejansko pričakovali revizijo in vzpostavitev jasnejše strukture zakonodaje, ne pa obsežnih sprememb, zato so upravičeno zaskrbljeni zaradi želje Komisije, da določi nova pravila in se z interesnimi skupinami ter Parlamentom posvetuje zgolj o splošnem okviru uredbe.
In fact, however, those operating in the sector as well as consumers expected a review establishing a clearer structure of the legislation, but have not sought such a large-scale change, and are rightly concerned about the desire of the Commission to redefine the rules and to consult the stakeholders and the Parliament only on the general framework of the regulation.
Hvalevredni cilji, a sporna metodologija
Praiseworthy objectives but questionable methodology
V nasprotju z nekdanjimi posvetovanji o Uredbi 2092/91 in njeni spremembi v letu 1998, ko je bila vključena živinoreja, je Komisija sklenila nadomestiti obstoječe priloge z izvedbenimi pravili, ne da bi se o tem posvetovala s Parlamentom.
In contrast to previous consultations on regulation 2092/91 and its revision in 1998 including livestock, the Commission has decided to replace the existing annexes by implementing rules on which the Parliament is not consulted.
Komisija meni, da so izvedbena pravila zgolj tehnične narave in jih je treba določiti po postopku komitologije.
The Commission believes that implementing rules are purely technical, and should be defined according to the commitology procedure.
Poročevalka nasprotuje tej razlagi.
Your draftswoman disagrees with this interpretation.
Sedanje priloge vsebujejo zakonodajne prvine, kot je na primer določitev pozitivnega seznama proizvodov in postopkov, ki so pri ekološkem kmetovanju dovoljeni.
The current annexes include legislative substance, such as e.g. the definition of the positive list of authorized products and practices in organic farming.
Glede na spor iz leta 1993, ki je med Parlamentom in Komisijo nastal zaradi odobritve gensko spremenjenih organizmov v ekološkem kmetovanju po postopku komitologije, zaradi česar je prišlo tudi do tožbe na Evropskem sodišču, bi se bilo bolje izogniti novim sporom in slediti predpisanemu posvetovanju.
In the light of the conflict which arose between the Parliament and the Commission in 1993 on the authorisation of GMOs in organic farming via commitology procedure including a case at the European Court of Justice, it would be wiser to avoid new disputes through proper consultation.
Zato poročevalka v predlogu spremembe 177 navaja, da je o izvedbenih pravilih potrebno posvetovanje s Parlamentom, ali da bi moral imeti ta, podobno kot Svet, pravico do veta na izvedbena pravila, ko bi te sprejeli ali spreminjali.
Your draftswoman suggests therefore in AM 177 that Parliament should be consulted on the implementing rules or have the right -as the Council has - to veto on the implementing rules once they have been approved or changed.
Bistvene točke, ki jih je treba pojasniti in izboljšati
Key points on which clarification and improvement is needed
Pri vsebini besedila so se kljub nekaterim izboljšavam, na primer na področju krmljenja rejnih živali, takoj pojavila vprašanja glede številnih vidikov, ki zahtevajo pojasnila in jasne odločitve:
With regard to the substance of the text, a number of aspects have - despite positive progress on, for example, the feeding of livestock - raised immediate questions, calling for clarification and requiring clear choices to be made:
- Opredelitve pojmov ter načel in ciljev ekološkega kmetovanja so preveč splošne in bi jih lahko v sedanji obliki razlagali zelo različno.
- The definitions given, as well as the principles and objectives laid down for organic farming, are too general and would be subject to differing interpretation if left as they currently stand.
Da se ohrani zaupanje potrošnika, je potrebno oblikovati jasne, natančne in dosledne opredelitve.
If consumer trust is to be maintained, clear, precise and strict definitions are, on the contrary, needed.
- Področje uporabe, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, izključuje preskrbo s hrano in neprehrambene proizvode, čeprav povpraševanje po ekoloških proizvodih v teh dveh sektorjih narašča in se je treba nanj primerno odzvati.
- The scope of the provisions suggested by the Commission exclude catering and non-food products, despite the fact that these two areas are experiencing growing demand for organic products, which needs to be responded to in an organised way.
Po drugi strani velja nova uredba tudi za ribogojstvo in sektor ekološke pridelave vina, kar je nadvse hvalevredno.
On the other hand, the new regulation is to include aquaculture and the organic wine sector, which is extremely welcome.
Poročevalka v soglasju s številnimi državami članicami, ki želijo, da bi uredba veljala tudi za menze v javnih ustanovah, restavracije in gostinske dejavnosti, pri katerih se uporabljajo ekološki proizvodi, v predlogu spremembe 1 navaja, da bi kot pravno osnovo uredbe uporabili tako člen 37 kot tudi člen 95 Pogodbe.
In line with many Member States which would like to see public canteens, restaurants and catering using organic products included in the scope of the regulation, your draftswoman suggests in AM 1 to adopt as legal basis of the regulation both Article 37 and Article 95 of the Treaty.
- Najbolj sporna točka je nova določba o sprejemljivi „prožnosti” v zvezi z uredbo, ki bi, kot je predvideno v predlogu Komisije, določala manj stroge pogoje za odobritev izjem.
- The point which has given rise to the most controversy is the new provision on acceptable ' flexibility' in relation to the regulation, which, as envisaged in the Commission proposal, would allow exceptions imposing less strict conditions.
Prožni pogoji so v močnem nasprotju s predlogom Komisije, da se ne dovoli poudarjati navedb držav izvora in specifikacij zasebnih ekoloških standardov, ki so se dolga leta uporabljali kot osnova za javne ali zasebne nacionalne ali regionalne logotipe in so prispevali k graditvi zaupanja potrošnikov.
This flexible scope of conditions is in sharp contrast to the Commission's proposal, not to allow the highlighting of indications of the countries of origin and specifications of private organic standards, which for years have been used as a basis for public or private national or regional logos and have contributed to build consumers' trust.
Ti logotipi potrošnikov v nasprotju s trditvami Komisije ne begajo in ne izkrivljajo notranjega trga, temveč spodbujajo in bogatijo ponudbo in povpraševanje.
These logos do not confuse consumers or distort the internal market, as the Commission claims, but stimulate and differentiate supply and demand.
Če označevanje in oglaševanje teh izdelkov temelji na konkretnih in preverljivih dejstvih, ni sprejemljivo, da se učinkovito delovanje zasebnih združenj, ki dobavljajo jasno opredeljene proizvode, spodkopava v korist skupne oznake EU in prožnih, nepoznanih pravil, ki bi lahko oslabila zaupanje potrošnikov.
Provided that the labelling and advertising of such products are based on specific and verifiable facts, it is unthinkable that the operation of private associations which function effectively, supplying clearly identified products, should be undermined in favour of a common EU label and elastic, unfamiliar rules which would risk damaging consumer trust.
- Določbe o uporabi zlasti fitofarmacevtskih sredstev in sredstev za veterinarsko zdravljenje, ki so bila doslej pri ekološkem kmetovanju prepovedana, so v osnutku uredbe prožnejše, čeprav potrošniki pripisujejo prav temu vidiku ekološke proizvodnje velik pomen.
- The provisions on the use, in particular, of plant protection products and veterinary treatments, which until now have been prohibited in organic farming, are more flexible in the draft regulation, despite the fact that this aspect is very important in terms of the attraction of organic production for consumers.
- Uredba poudarja, da je uporaba gensko spremenjenih organizmov pri ekološkem kmetovanju prepovedana.
- The regulation stresses that the use of genetically modified organisms is prohibited in organic production.
Kot pa kažejo sedanje razprave v Svetu, še vedno vlada nejasnost glede opredelitve proizvodov, pridobljenih iz GSO ali z njimi.
However, as the current discussions in the Council show, there is still confusion about definitions of products made by or from GMO.
Bodoči predpisi bi morali ekološkim kmetovalcem omogočati pridelavo brez kontaminacije.
The future rules should enable organic farmers to produce without any contamination.
Nič ne kaže, da bi imela Komisija namen predlagati skupni zakonodajni okvir, ki bi izključeval kontaminacijo kmetij in proizvodov v vsej živilski verigi.
The Commission has not shown the intention to draft a common legislative framework which can exclude the contamination of farms and products throughout the food chain.
Še vedno je treba podrobno opredeliti način, kako bi zagotovili uporabo previdnostnega načela na vseh stopnjah proizvodnje, in določiti pravila glede sožitja in odgovornosti v primeru kontaminacije.
Details of the means to be employed in order to apply the precautionary principle at all stages of production and rules on issues of coexistence and responsibility in the event of contamination have yet to be laid down.
- Cilj uredbe mora biti zagotoviti neodvisnost in zanesljivost služb za pregledovanje in potrjevanje, zlasti v odnosu do uvoznikov in podjetij v tretjih državah, z jasnim in zanesljivim sistemom akreditacije na osnovi kar najstrožjih in ustreznih standardov.
- Finally, the regulation must aim to ensure the independence and reliability of inspection and certification bodies, in particular in their relations with importers and operators in third countries, by means of a clear, reliable accreditation system based on the most stringent standards applicable.
- Ni pa sprejemljivo, da se uporaba besedila EU-EKOLOŠKO za proizvode iz tretjih držav dovoli brez nadaljnjih podatkov o nacionalnem ali regionalnem izvoru.
- It is not acceptable, however, that the indication 'EU ORGANIC' should be permitted to be applied to products from third countries without further information being given on the national or regional origin.
Potrošniki imajo pravico izvedeti, od kod izvirajo ekološki proizvodi, ki jih kupujejo, tudi če ti ustrezajo evropskim standardom.
Consumers have the right to know the origin of the organic products they are purchasing, even if they meet European standards.
Nov zagon za ekološko kmetovanje
Giving a fresh boost to organic farming
Revizija evropske uredbe o ekološkem kmetovanju je lahko in bi morala biti priložnost za nov zagon te oblike proizvodnje.
The review of the European regulation on organic farming can, and should, provide an opportunity for giving a genuine boost to this form of production.
Njene prednosti so zdaj splošno priznane, povpraševanje po njej v naših družbah narašča.
The benefits of this production are now recognised and demand grows in our societies.
Potrebno usklajevanje in pojasnitev pa ne smeta spodkopati strogih zahtev in zaupanja, ki sta temelja ekološkega kmetovanja.
That is on condition, however, that the necessary harmonisation and clarification are not at the expense of strict requirements and trust, which are the cornerstones of organic farming!
Ekološko kmetovanje pravzaprav ni le trg z nišo, ki ga je treba razvijati, temveč predvsem celosten pristop h kmetijstvu v vseh njegovih razsežnostih (vključno z gospodarskimi in zaposlovalnimi vidiki, povezanimi z okoljem, zemljo, zdravjem ...), ki bi moral predstavljati izhodišče obsežne reforme skupne kmetijske politike, da bi zagotovil resnično trajnosten razvoj.
Organic farming is, in fact, not merely a niche market to be developed, but above all represents an integrated approach to agriculture which takes account of all of its dimensions (including economic and employment aspects, associated with environment, land, health, etc), and should inspire overall reform of the Common Agricultural Policy with a view to ensuring genuinely sustainable development.
odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga za uredbo Sveta o ekološki pridelavi in označevanju ekoloških proizvodov ( KOM(2005)0671 – C6‑0032/2006 – 2005/0278(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the Proposal for a Council Regulation on organic production and labelling of organic products ( COM(2005)0671 – C6‑0032/2006 – 2005/0278(CNS) )
Spoštovani gospod predsednik
Dear Chairman,
V svojem pismu 26. novembra 2006 je tedanji predsednik vašega odbora Joseph DAUL zaprosil odbor za pravne zadeve, naj po členu 35(2) poslovnika preveri, ali je pravna podlaga omenjenega predloga Komisije veljavna in ustrezna.
By letter of 29 November 2006 the then Chairman of your committee, Mr Joseph Daul, asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.