natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Članice STO so se sporazumele o skupni izjavi zaradi odločenosti Evropske unije, da se vključijo natančno določene obveznosti, ki bodo omogočile boljše vključevanje najrevnejših držav v rast svetovne trgovine.
The WTO members were able to draft this joint declaration as a result of the European Union’s determination to include precise commitments to allow better integration of the poorest countries in the growth of world trade.
Omenjeno stališče Evropske unije so njeni partnerji upoštevali zahvaljujoč medsebojni usklajenosti organov Skupnosti – Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije.
The European Union’s position has been taken on board by its partners thanks to the unity among the Community institutions: Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Takšna enotnost je še toliko bolj pomembna danes, ko ministrska izjava predvideva, da se pogajanja pospešijo in da se pogajalski krog zaključi do konca letošnjega leta.
This unity is all the more important now as the Ministerial Declaration provides for the acceleration of negotiations in order to complete the round by the end of this year.
Na 6. ministrski konferenci so se države članice STO sporazumele o treh bistvenih točkah in tako omogočile napredek v pogajanjih:
At the Sixth Ministerial Conference, WTO members agreed on three essential points, which should allow negotiations to advance:
1. vzporedno in postopno odpravljanje vseh oblik izvoznih subvencij in pravil o vseh izvoznih ukrepih s podobnimi učinki, ki se mora zaključiti do konca leta 2013,
1. the parallel and progressive elimination of all forms of export subsidies and disciplines on all export measures with equivalent effect by the end of 2013;
2. uvedba posebnega režima za dostop do trga za izdelke iz najmanj razvitih držav, ki kljub temu, da odprtje velja samo za 97 % tarifnih oznak, predstavlja prvi pomembni korak za najmanj razvite države,
2. the setting-up of a specific system to provide market access for products from the least developed countries (LDCs), which, in spite of the fact that the opening applies to only 97% of tariff lines, is an important first step for these countries;
3. začetek reševanja vprašanja bombaža, ki je posebej občutljivo za afriške države.
3. the beginnings of a solution to the cotton dispute, a sensitive issue for African countries.
Hkrati določa ministrska izjava delovni program, ki za kmetijstvo predvideva naslednje roke:
The Ministerial Declaration also set out a work agenda with the following deadlines:
do 30. aprila 2006 morajo pogajalci opredeliti naslednje, v številkah izražene pogoje:
By 30 April 2006, negotiators will have to establish quantified modalities with regard to:
- v zvezi z notranjo podporo: določitev kategorij za postopno zmanjševanje in za stopnje znižanja tako v okviru globalnega merjenja podpore kot v okviru splošnega znižanja notranje podpore, ki izkrivlja trgovino,
- domestic support - the definition of bands for a tiered reduction and reduction levels for both the Aggregate Measurement of Support and the overall cut in trade-distorting domestic support;
- v zvezi z izvozno konkurenco: določitev pravil o izvoznih posojilih ali programih zavarovanja, izvoznih državnih trgovskih podjetjih in pomoči v hrani ter pogojev za vzporedno in postopno odpravljanja vseh oblik izvoznih subvencij,
- export competition - the establishing of disciplines with respect to export credits and insurance programmes, export state trading enterprises and food aid, and the implementation modalities for the parallel and progressive elimination of all forms of export subsidy;
- v zvezi z dostopom do trga: določitev kategorij za tarifno znižanje, stopnje znižanja carin, obravnavo občutljivih izdelkov in posebnih izdelkov za države v razvoju ter mehanizem v zvezi s posebno zaščitno klavzulo,
- market access - the definition of bands for the cut in tariffs, along with the reduction levels for customs tariffs, the treatment of sensitive products and of special products with regard to developing countries, and the special safeguard clause;
- posebna in prilagojena obravnava za države v razvoju v zvezi s tremi področji kmetijskega pogajanja,
- the special and differential treatment applicable to developing countries in relation to the three areas of agricultural negotiations.
do 31. julija 2006 morajo države članice STO predložiti v številkah izražene ponudbe na podlagi tako opredeljenih pogojev.
By 31 July 2006, WTO members will have to submit quantified offers based on these modalities.
Vse razprave o seznamih koncesij morajo potekati letošnjo jesen, da se bo lahko krog pogajanj, ki se je začel v Dohi, sklenil do 31. decembra 2006.
The discussions on the lists of concessions should take place this autumn so that the round of negotiations begun at Doha can be completed by 31 December 2006.
V tem okviru je nujno, da Evropska unija dejavno sodeluje pri razpravah o pogajalskih pogojih, na podlagi katerih bodo izdelani seznami koncesij.
It is imperative that the European Union should play an active part in the discussions on the negotiation modalities that will lead to the drafting of lists of concessions.
Sporazum o trgovinskih pogajanjih je možno doseči samo s trojnim ravnovesjem:
An agreement for the trade negotiations can only be found if there is the following:
- splošnim ravnovesjem pri pogajanjih z namenom spoštovanja načela skupnih zavez,
- an overall balance in the negotiations in order to respect the single-undertaking principle;
- ravnovesjem pri kmetijskih pogajanjih z upoštevanjem vloženih naporov pridelovalcev Evropske unije v okviru zaporednih reform in z ohranitvijo SKP ter večnamenskega značaja kmetijstva,
- balance within the agricultural negotiations, taking into account the efforts already undertaken by Community producers through a series of reforms and maintaining the CAP reform and the multifunctional nature of agriculture;
- ravnovesjem vloženih naporov članic STO z upoštevanjem njihovih možnosti sodelovanja pri pogajanjih in njihove stopnje razvitosti.
- balance of the efforts made by members of the World Trade Organisation, taking into consideration their ability to take part in the negotiations and their level of development.
Za to je treba nujno oceniti pogoje razlikovanja med državami v razvoju in omejiti posledice liberalizacije trgovine zaradi zmanjševanja preferencialov, ki so jih deležne države, ki imajo sklenjene preferencialne sporazume z Evropsko unijo.
With this in mind, it is essential to evaluate the conditions for the differentiation among developing countries and to limit the impact of trade liberalisation for those countries that have preferential agreements with the European Union by removing the preferences granted under these agreements.
Na koncu je treba poudariti usklajenost, ki jo je pokazala Evropska unija na 6. ministrski konferenci STO in ki jo je treba ohraniti tudi v prihodnje.
The unity shown by the European Union at the Sixth Ministerial Conference should remain intact.
Zato je nujno, da Evropska komisija, kadar je potrebno, poroča Odboru Evropskega parlamenta za kmetijstvo o napredovanju razprav.
It is imperative, therefore, that the Commission should, wherever necessary, keep Parliament’s Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development informed of progress in the negotiations.
Ocena pogajalskega kroga iz Dohe po ministrski konferenci Svetovne trgovinske organizacije v Hongkongu
Results of the Sixth Ministerial Conference of the WTO in Hong Kong
Predlogi resolucij, vključeni v poročilo
Motion(s) for resolution(s) included in report
s priporočili Komisiji o dostopu do besedil institucij
with recommendations to the Commission on access to the institutions' texts
PE 360.242
PE 360.242v03-00
PRILOGA K PREDLOGU RESOLUCIJE:
ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION:
PODROBNA PRIPOROČILA O VSEBINI ZAHTEVANEGA PREDLOGA............................5
DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS on THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED 6
– ob upoštevanju drugega odstavka člena 192 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 192, second paragraph, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročil institucij o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, predvsem prvega triletnega poročila Komisije o njegovem izvajanju, kot ga predvideva člen 17(2) te uredbe,
– having regard to the institutions' reports on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents and, particularly, to the Commission's first triennial report on implementation, as provided for in Article 17(2) of that Regulation,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve( A6‑0052/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0052/2006 ),
A. ker je od ratifikacije Amsterdamske pogodbe in začetka veljavnosti člena 255 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti preglednost postala temeljno načelo Evropske unije s cilji krepiti demokratičnost evropskih institucij, omogočiti državljanom večjo udeležbo v postopku oblikovanja političnih odločitev, zagotoviti, da javna uprava s povečanjem učinkovitosti in odgovornosti do državljanov uživa večjo legitimnost, in ne nazadnje, pravočasno odkriti napake in probleme;
A. whereas since ratification of the Amsterdam Treaty and the entry into force of Article 255 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), transparency has become a fundamental principle of the European Union, the aims of which are to strengthen the democratic nature of the European institutions, enable citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process, ensure that public administrations enjoy greater legitimacy by being more effective and more accountable to the citizens, and, finally, allow problems or errors to be detected in a more timely manner,
B. ker Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 samo delno vključuje člen 255 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi ES, saj:
B. whereas Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 only partially implements Article 255 TEC, in as much as:
- je njena posredna definicija zakonodajne dejavnosti (člen 12) preveč splošna in bi lahko ustvarila zmedo pri dejavnostih upravne narave; nadalje, Uredba ne predvideva, da bi morala Svet in Parlament o zakonodaji razpravljati javno in jo javno sprejemati ali da bi morali biti poleg novih zakonodajnih predlogov takoj dostopni tudi predlogi sprememb in pobude držav članic; iz istega razloga bi morali biti vsi pripravljalni zakonodajni dokumenti dostopni (ne glede na to ali so jih pripravile pravne službe institucij ali ne), da se lahko odločitve sprejmejo z enakopravnega vidika in z lojalnim sodelovanjem Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, poleg tega še vedno ni skupnega razumevanja objave zakonodajnih besedil v Uradnem listu ali glede tega, kako naj bi bil urejen Uradni list (na primer, kar zadeva elektronsko izdajo),
- its implicit definition of legislative activity (Article 12) is too general and could create confusion with activities of an administrative nature; moreover, the Regulation does not provide that legislation should be debated and adopted in public by the Council and the Parliament or that, in addition to legislative initiatives, amendments submitted by the Member States should also be immediately accessible; by the same token, all preparatory legislative documents should also be accessible (regardless of whether they are drawn up by the legal services of the institutions) so that decisions can be taken on an equal footing and in loyal cooperation by Parliament, the Council and the Commission in full knowledge of the domain to be regulated; furthermore, there is still no common understanding of the requirements regarding publication of legislative texts in the Official Journal or the way in which the Journal should be organised (for instance, as far as the electronic edition is concerned),
- ni jasnih pravil o: dostopu do dokumentov upravne narave; tako imenovanem "času za premislek"; boljšem pripravljanju osnutkov; obveščanju državljanov o postopkih, ki veljajo za vsako od vpletenih institucij; skupnih pravilih arhiviranja dokumentov in o privilegiranem dostopu oseb s posebnimi pravicami dostopa,
- there are no clear rules on: access to documents of an administrative nature; the so-called time for reflection; better drafting; informing citizens of the procedure to be followed by each institution involved; common rules for archiving documents, or privileged access by persons with specific access rights,
– tri institucije nimajo skupnega dostopa, saj so upravni mehanizmi (registri, podatkovne baze in druge IT aplikacije institucij) še vedno v poskusni fazi in tri institucije še nimajo skupnega pristopa; ni nikakršnega soglasja med institucijami niti o upravljanju, delitvi in shranjevanju različnih tipov dokumentov v medinstitucionalnih postopkih; čeprav je bilo nekaj izboljšav narejenih, obstaja še vedno pomanjkanje usklajenosti med institucijami, predvsem pri dokumentih, povezanih z medinstitucionalnimi postopki, kar predstavlja veliko zmedo tako med običajnimi državljani, kot tudi strokovnjaki, raziskovalci ter nacionalnimi parlamenti;
- the administrative machinery (institutions' registers, databases and other IT applications) is still in an experimental phase and there is no common approach by the three institutions; even as regards inter-institutional procedures, there is still no common understanding among the institutions on how to manage, share, and store the various types of documents; although some improvements have been made, there is still a clear lack of coordination between the institutions, notably in respect of documents linked to inter-institutional procedures, as a result of which it is not only ordinary citizens who are lost but also professionals, researchers and national parliaments,
C. ker, čeprav se je z določbami Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 predvidelo njeno revizijo po treh letih veljavnosti in čeprav je Parlament od Komisije večkrat zahteval, naj izboljša in okrepi preglednost EU zakonodaje, še vedno ni v pripravi predloga v smislu člena 39(2) Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta,
C. whereas, even though provision was made in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 for its revision after three years, and despite the fact that Parliament has asked the Commission on several occasions to improve and strengthen Community legislation on transparency, no proposal within the meaning of Rule 39(2) of Parliament's Rules of Procedure is underway,
D. ker so v nekaterih pogledih težave pri uporabi Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 povezane z neustreznim izvajanjem; ker je sodna praksa Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zvezi z Uredbo prav tako pokazala, da je treba natančneje razviti in razjasniti nekatere določbe Uredbe, zlasti tiste o dokumentih, ki jih pripravijo države članice in tretje stranke, ter o izjemah zaradi preiskav, pravnega nasveta in "časa za premislek";
D. whereas the problems in the application of the Regulation (EC) No 1049/01 have in some respects been linked to inadequate implementation; whereas the case-law of the Court of Justice has also revealed the need to develop and clarify some of the provisions of the Regulation, particularly those concerning documents produced by the Member States and third parties and the exceptions for investigations, legal advice and the 'time for reflection',
E. ker v primerjavi s tajnimi pogajanji Sveta pregledna in odprta pogajanja in lojalno sodelovanje med institucijami predstavljajo boljši način zagotavljanja učinkovitosti postopka odločanja, opredeljenega v členu 207 Pogodbe ES; zato obžaluje, da se je Svet v Zaključkih z dne 22. decembra 2005 odločil, da ne bo spremenil svojega poslovnika in v zakonodajnem postopku imel preglednih razprav na ministrski ravni;
E. whereas transparent and open negotiations and loyal cooperation between the institutions are a better way of ensuring the effectiveness of the decision-making procedure referred to in Article 207 of the EC Treaty than secret negotiations in the Council; regretting, therefore, that, in its Conclusions of 22 December 2005, the Council chose not to amend its rules of procedure and to have transparent debates at ministerial level throughout the legislative procedure,
Vsi državljani Unije in vse fizične ali pravne osebe s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic imajo pravico dostopa do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije ob upoštevanju načel in pogojev, ki naj se določijo v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3.
Requests the Commission to submit to Parliament in 2006, on the basis of Article 255 TEC, a legislative proposal on 'the right of access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, and general principles and limits on grounds of public or private interest governing this right of access', which should be prepared in inter-institutional discussions and follow the detailed recommendations set out below;
Splošna načela in omejitve iz razlogov javnega ali zasebnega interesa, ki veljajo za to pravico dostopa do dokumentov, določi Svet v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 v dveh letih po začetku veljavnosti Amsterdamske pogodbe.
Confirms that the recommendations below respect the principle of subsidiarity, the fundamental rights of citizens, the case-law of the ECHR, particularly that on Article 8, and Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
Vsaka od zgoraj navedenih institucij v svojem poslovniku predpiše posebne določbe glede dostopa do njenih dokumentov , ki predstavlja pravno podlago Uredbi sami:
(3) Each institution referred to above shall elaborate in its own Rules of Procedure specific provisions regarding access to its documents.' , which is the legal basis for the Regulation itself:
(a) predstavlja glavno pravno podlago v pogodbah za izvajanje temeljnih načel Unije, opisanih v členu 1 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, po katerem "...se odločitve sprejemajo čimbolj javno in v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljanom" , ter v členu 6 iste pogodbe, po katerem "Unija temelji na načelih ...demokracije ...ter pravne države";
(a) is the main legal basis in the Treaties for implementing the founding principles of the Union, outlined in Article 1 of the Treaty on the European Union (TEU), according to which '... decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen', and in Article 6 TEU, according to which 'the Union is founded on the principles of ... democracy ... and the rule of law';
(b) predstavlja osrednjo pravno podlago kar zadeva preglednost in zaupnost vseh dejavnosti Sveta, Komisije in Parlamenta ("zakonodajnega trikotnika"), ko delujejo v skladu s Pogodbo o ustanovitvi ES in Pogodbo o EU;
(b) is the pivotal legal basis, as far as transparency and confidentiality are concerned, for all the activities of the Council, the Commission and Parliament (the 'legislative triangle') when acting under the TEC and the TEU;
(c) mora biti dosledno in popolnoma vključen v poslovnike Evropskega parlamenta
(c) must be loyally and fully implemented in the rules of procedure of the European Parliament
Člen 199 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi ES: Evropski parlament sprejme svoj poslovnik z večino svojih članov. , Komisije
Article 199 TEC: 'The European Parliament shall adopt its Rules of Procedure, acting by a majority of its Members.' , the Commission
Člen 218(2) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi ES: "Komisija sprejme svoj poslovnik, da bi zagotovila skladnost svojega delovanja in delovanja svojih služb s to pogodbo.
Article 218(2) TEC: 'The Commission shall adopt its Rules of Procedure, acting by a majority of its Members.' and of the Council
Za namen tega odstavka Svet določi primere, v katerih ga je treba obravnavati kot zakonodajni organ, da bi bil v teh primerih omogočen boljši dostop do dokumentov in hkrati ohranjena učinkovitost njegovega postopka odločanja.
For the purpose of this paragraph, the Council shall define the cases in which it is to be regarded as acting in its legislative capacity, with a view to allowing greater access to documents in those cases, while at the same time preserving the effectiveness of its decision-making process.
V vsakem primeru, ko Svet odloča kot zakonodajni organ, se rezultati in razlage glasovanja ter izjave v zapisniku objavijo. ;
In any event, when the Council acts in its legislative capacity, the results of votes and explanations of vote as well as statements in the minutes shall be made public.' ;
(d) mora biti dosledno uporabljen, ko institucije delujejo kot zakonodajno telo (kot je opisano v členu 207 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi ES) ali izvajajo zakonodajo EU in ES (člen 202 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi ES)
(d) must be applied consistently when the institutions act in a legislative capacity (as outlined in Article 207 TEC) or implement EU and EC legislation (Article 202 TEC)
Glede izvajanja te pristojnosti lahko Svet postavi nekatere zahteve.
The Council may impose certain requirements in respect of the exercise of these powers.
Poleg tega si lahko Svet v posebnih primerih pridrži pravico, da sam neposredno izvaja to pristojnost.
The Council may also reserve the right, in specific cases, to exercise directly implementing powers itself.
Zgoraj navedeni postopki morajo biti skladni z načeli in pravili, ki jih je Svet predhodno soglasno sprejel na predlog Komisije in po pridobitvi mnenja Evropskega parlamenta." , ne glede na to katera institucija pooblašča ali izvaja EU/ES pravila.
The procedures referred to above must be consonant with principles and rules to be laid down in advance by the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after obtaining the opinion of the European Parliament.' , irrespective of which institution implements the legislation or exercises implementing powers.
Priporočilo št. 2 (o pojmih zakonodajni in nezakonodajni dokumenti)
Recommendation 2 (on the concepts of legislative and non-legislative documents)
Po razpravi v medinstitucionalnem odboru, ustanovljenem na podlagi člena 15 Uredbe in v skladu z načeli, orisanimi v Priporočilu št. 1, naj Komisija spremeni Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001 na naslednji način:
The Commission, following discussion in the inter-institutional committee provided for in Article 15 of the Regulation and in compliance with the principles outlined in Recommendation 1, should amend Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001:
(a) ponovno naj opredeli pojem "zakonodajni dokumenti", ki so trenutno določeni v členu 12(2) te Uredbe kot dokumenti, ki so "...pripravljeni ali prejeti med postopki za sprejetje aktov, ki so pravno zavezujoči v državah članicah ali zanje", z navedbo, da mora biti pojem (zakonodajnega) akta rezerviran le za sekundarno pravo (z neposredno pravno podlago v Pogodbah); za zakonodajne dokumente bi dostop moral biti zagotovljen:
(a) by re-defining the concept of 'legislative documents', currently defined in Article 12(2) of that Regulation, as documents '...drawn up or received in the course of procedures for the adoption of acts that are legally binding in or on the Member States', by adding a reference to the fact that the concept of (legislative) act should be reserved for secondary law only (with a direct legal basis in the Treaties); As far as legislative documents are concerned, access should be granted:
– do vseh pripravljalnih dokumentov, povezanih z opredeljenimi postopki odločanja; dostop bi moral biti odobren takoj, ko so v procesu odločanja udeležene institucije formalno oddale dokumente;
– to all preparatory documents linked to an identified decisional procedure; access should be granted as soon as those documents are formally submitted by each institution taking part in the decision;
– do zapisa razprav Parlamenta ali Sveta, kadar ti dve instituciji delujeta kot zakonodajni telesi ter do obravnavanih dokumentov (če le-ti niso zaupni, glej Priporočilo 3);
– to the record of the Parliament or Council debates, where those institutions are acting in a legislative capacity, and to the documents discussed (if not classified, see Recommendation 3 below);
– do imen avtorjev vsake pobude ali uradnega predloga spremembe;
– to the identity of the author of each initiative or formal amendment;