natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ribiška politika EU bi morala biti dosledna tako v EU kot zunaj nje.
EU fisheries policy should be consistent both within and outside the EU.
(2c) Pri izvajanju člena 2(1) protokola je treba upoštevati pogoje iz člena 1(2) istega protokola.
(2c) In implementing Article 2(1) of the Protocol, the conditions referred to in Article 1(2) of the Protocol should be observed.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu letno poroča o rezultatih sektorske ribiške politike, opisane v členu 4 protokola.
The Commission shall report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on the results of the sectoral fisheries policy described in Article 4 of the Protocol.
Da bi lahko ocenili, ali je nadomestilo, ki ga plačuje EU, ustrezno upoštevano in ali dejansko spodbuja trajnostni razvoj ribolovnih virov na Grenlandiji, bi morala Komisija vsako leto poročati Parlamentu.
In order to evaluate whether the compensation paid by the EU is properly accounted for and does in fact promote the sustainable use of fishery resources in Greenland, the Commission should report annually to the Parliament.
Če tega niso storile, Komisija zavrne njihove zahteve za ribolovna dovoljenja za naslednje leto.
Where they have not done so, the Commission shall refuse their requests for fishing licences for the following year.
Komisija pred iztekom veljavnosti protokola in začetkom pogajanj za njegovo morebitno podaljšanje predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu naknadno oceno protokola skupaj z analizo stroškov in koristi.
Prior to the expiry of the Protocol and before the beginning of negotiations for a possible renewal, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an ex post evaluation of the Protocol, including a cost-benefit analysis.
Sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med EU, Dansko in Grenlandijo je poseben sporazum.
This fisheries partnership agreement between the EU, Denmark and Greenland is a special agreement.
Z njim povezana plačila so namreč višja kot pa pri običajnem sporazumu samo o ribištvu.
Related payments are in fact higher than might be expected on the basis of a fisheries-only agreement.
Omeniti je treba, da so lastni prispevki sektorja sorazmerno nizki, kar kaže na to, da je sporazum o ribištvu del širšega paketa o sodelovanju med Grenlandijo in Evropsko unijo.
What is noticeable is that the sector’s own contribution is relatively low, all of which indicates that this fisheries agreement is part of a broad Greenland-EU cooperation package.
Presenetljivo je, da se sporazum tako malo posveča skupnim prizadevanjem za trajnostni pristop ali skupno upravljanje staležev.
It is striking that the agreement has little to say about joint efforts concerning sustainability or joint management of stocks.
Zaradi sedanjega segrevanja oceana se bodo vrste rib verjetno selile dlje proti severu, majhne staleže trske v Severnem morju, na primer, pa bo nadomestil ulov v bolj severnih morjih.
Current ocean warming makes it likely that fish species are migrating further northwards and that, for instance, low cod stocks in the North Sea are offset by levels in the Northern Seas.
Dobro bi bilo, če bi si Komisija na severnoatlantskem območju prizadevala za bolj celosten pristop.
The Commission would do well to work on a stronger integrated approach for the North Atlantic area.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo na eni strani ter vlado Danske in lokalno vlado Grenlandije na drugi strani
on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand
Grenlandija ima z EU sporazum o ribolovu od prenehanja njenega članstva leta 1985.
Greenland has had a fisheries agreement with the EU since it ceased to be a member in 1985.
Komisija se je ob vmesnem pregledu sporazuma leta 2004 odzvala na te zadeve tako, da je bolj prilagodila kvote, dodeljene EU, dejanskim možnostim, kar je bil dobrodošel ukrep.
At the mid-term review of the agreement in 2004, the Commission acted upon these concerns to an extent, by bringing the quotas allocated to the EU more into line with reality, which was a welcome move.
Hkrati pa je Svet izrazil namero, da bo sodelovanje z Grenlandijo osnoval na dveh ločenih stebrih – na sporazumu o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju ter na širši ureditvi za zagotovitev sodelovanja z Grenlandijo.
At that time, Council stated its intention to base cooperation with Greenland on two separate pillars - a fisheries partnership agreement and a broader arrangement to provide cooperation with Greenland.
Pričujoči sporazum predstavlja prvi steber, za drugega pa bo Svet posebej sprejel sklep.
The present agreement is the former, and the second will be the subject of a separate Council Decision.
Ta sporazum bo imel tako več značilnosti sporazumov o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju in bo v številnih ozirih podoben sporazumom z državami AKP.
This, then, is to be a more typical fisheries partnership agreement, similar in many respects to those with ACP countries.
Letni finančni prispevek je določen v višini 15.847.244 EUR, vključno z zneskom 3.261.449 EUR za pomoč Grenlandiji pri razvoju in izvajanju njenega večletnega sektorskega programa za ribištvo.
The financial contribution is fixed at EUR 15,847,244 per year, including an amount of EUR 3,261,449 to aid Greenland develop and implement its multiannual sectoral programme for fisheries.
V zameno bodo flote EU dobile kvote za nekatere pomembne staleže rib, vključno s trsko, rdečim okunom, grenlandsko morsko ploščo, navadnim jezikom, kozico, kapelanom in snežnim pajkom.
In exchange, the EU fleets will receive quotas for several important stocks of fish, including cod, redfish, Greenland halibut, Atlantic halibut, shrimp, capelin and snowcrab.
Nadomestilo vključuje tudi rezervo 1.540.000 EUR, ki se bo uporabila, če bo EU poleg že določenih letnih kvot še povečala dostop do staležev trske in kapelana; odločitev bo temeljila na znanstveni oceni staležev.
The compensation also includes a reserve of EUR 1,540,000 to be used if the EU gets increased access to cod and capelin stocks in addition to those provided for in the annual quotas; this would be based upon scientific assessments of the stocks.
Glavna razlika med sporazumom z Grenlandijo in sporazumi z državami AKP je bila v tem, da lastniki ladij iz EU ni bilo treba plačevati licenčnin, kar je privedlo do pritožb zaradi diskriminacije.
A major difference between the Greenland agreement and the ACP agreements was the lack of licence fees to be paid by EU ship-owners, which led to complaints about discrimination.
Kot je pripravljavka mnenja že poudarila, zamisel o večletnem sektorskem programu za ribištvo, o katerem bi Grenlandija in EU skupaj sprejeli odločitev prek skupnega odbora, daje možnost za izboljšanje upravljanja sporazuma in, če bodo informacije objavljene, tudi za njegovo večjo preglednost.
As your rapporteur has stressed before, the idea of a multiannual sectoral fisheries programme, to be jointly decided upon by Greenland and the EU via a Joint Committee, has the potential to improve the management of the agreement and, if the information is made public, its transparency as well.
Odbor za proračun mora vztrajati, da je o teh ocenah obveščen.
Committee on Budgets should insist that it be kept informed of these evaluations.
Ker gre za novost na področju protokolov, je še prezgodaj trditi, da bo to izkazalo za koristno in bo privedlo do odgovornejšega in trajnostnega ribištva na Grenlandiji, zato je potrebno pozorno spremljanje.
As this is a new development in protocols, it is too early to tell if it will prove useful, leading to more responsible and sustainable fisheries in Greenland, so we must follow this development carefully.
Predlagani so trije predlogi sprememb.
Three amendments are proposed.
Dva se nanašata na informacije, ki bi jih morala Komisija posredovati Parlamentu, vključno s podrobnim naknadnim vrednotenjem sporazuma pred njegovim podaljšanjem ter poročili o rezultatih večletnega sektorskega programa.
Two relate to information that the Commission should provide to the Parliament, including a detailed ex post evaluation of the agreement before it is renewed and reports on the results of the multiannual sectoral programme.
Tretji predlog spremembe je, da se državam članicam, ki ne poročajo Komisiji o ulovu, kar so dolžne storiti v skladu s skupno ribiško politiko, naslednje leto ne bi smelo izdati ribolovnega dovoljenja.
The third proposes that if Member States do not report their catches to the Commission as they are required to do under the Common Fisheries Policy, then they should not be given fishing licences the following year.
Komisar Borg je upravičeno namenil veliko prednost boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu in če države članice EU ne izpolnjujejo svojih osnovnih dolžnosti poročanja o ulovu, se zdi smiselno, da se jim prepove koriščenje precejšnjih subvencij, ki jih zagotavljajo sporazumi o ribolovu.
Commissioner Borg has quite rightly given a very high priority to the fight against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing, and if EU Member States do not fulfil their basic responsibilities to report catches, it seems reasonable to not allow them to benefit from the significant subsides that these fisheries access agreements provide.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu letno poroča o rezultatih večletne sektorske ribiške politike, opisane v členu 4 protokola.
The Commission shall report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on the results of the multiannual sectoral fisheries policy described in Article 4 of the Protocol.
Komisija vsako leto oceni, ali so države članice, katerih plovila delujejo v skladu s tem protokolom, izpolnile obveznosti poročanja.
The Commission shall evaluate each year whether Member States whose vessels operate under this protocol have complied with reporting requirements.
Če tega niso storile, Komisija ne ugodi njihovim zahtevam za ribolovna dovoljenja za naslednje leto.
Where they have not done so, the Commission shall withhold their requests for fishing licences for the following year.
Komisija pred iztekom veljavnosti protokola in pred začetkom novih pogajanj za njegovo morebitno podaljšanje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži naknadno vrednotenje protokola, ki vključuje analizo stroškov in koristi.
Prior to expiry of the Protocol and before the beginning of new negotiations for a possible renewal, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an ex post evaluation of the Protocol, including a cost-benefit analysis.
Pred začetkom novih pogajanj je potrebno vrednotenje sedanjega protokola, zato da se ugotovi, ali je treba v morebitno obnovo protokola vključiti spremembe in kakšne naj bi te bile.
An evaluation of the current protocol is necessary before new negotiations begin in order to know what changes, if any, should be included in any possible renewal.
Partnerstvo v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo na eni strani ter Dansko in Grenlandijo na drugi strani
Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EC on the one hand and Denmark and Greenland on the other hand
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o ukrepih za ohranjanje in izvrševanje, ki se uporabljajo v območju upravljanja Organizacije za ribištvo severozahodnega Atlantika
on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation
PE 384.568v01-00
PE 384.568v02-00
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o ukrepih za ohranjanje in izvrševanje, ki se uporabljajo v območju upravljanja Organizacije za ribištvo severozahodnega Atlantika
on the proposal for a Council regulation on laying down conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0609 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0609 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0403/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0403/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0162/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0162/2007 ),
Prilovne zahteve
By-catch requirements
Na krovu zadržan prilov
By-catch retained on board
Ribolovna plovila ne smejo izvajati usmerjenega ribolova vrste, za katero veljajo omejitve prilova .
Fishing vessels may not conduct directed fisheries for species for which by catch limits apply.
Usmerjeni ribolov vrste se izvaja, kadar ta vrsta obsega največji masni odstotek ulova v katerem koli izvleku .
A directed fishery for a species is conducted when that species comprises the largest percentage by weight of the catch in any one haul .
Ribiška plovila omejijo prilov vseh vrst, navedenih v Prilogi I, za katere Skupnosti v tistem razdelku ulova niso bile dodeljene kvote, na največ 2.500 kg ali na 10 %, če ta delež predstavlja večjo količino .
Fishing vessels shall limit their by-catch to a maximum of 2500 kg or 10 %, whichever is the greater, for each species listed in Annex I for which no quota has been allocated in that Division to the Community .
Prilov vrst, za katere Skupnost ni določila kvot za del območja upravljanja NAFO in ki je bil ulovljen v tem delu pri neposrednem ribolovu katere koli vrste, ne sme presegati 2 500 kg po posamezni vrsti ali 10 masnih % skupnega ulova, obdržanega na krovu, pri čemer se upošteva večja vrednost.
By ‑catches of the species for which no quotas have been fixed by the Community for a part of the NAFO Regulatory Area and taken in that part when fishing directly for any species may not exceed for each species 2 500 kg or 10 % by weight of the total catch retained on board, whichever is the greater.
Vendar v delu območja upravljanja NAFO, kjer je usmerjeni ribolov nekaterih vrst prepovedan ali je bila kvota „drugi“ popolnoma izrabljena, prilov nobene take vrste ne sme presegati 1 250 kg oziroma 5 %.
However, in a part of the NAFO Regulatory Area where directed fishing of certain species is banned or an “others” quota has been fully utilised, by-catches of each of such species may not exceed 1 250 kg or 5 % respectively .
V primerih, ko velja prepoved ribolova ali je kvota "drugo" izčrpana, prilov zadevnih vrst ne sme presegati 1.250 kg ali 5 %, če ta delež predstavlja večjo količino.
In cases where a ban on fishing is in force or an "Others" quota has been fully utilised, the by-catch of the species concerned may not exceed 1250 kg or 5 %, whichever is the greater .
Vedno, kadar skupna količina vrste, za katero veljajo omejitve prilova, v katerem koli izvleku preseže eno od omejitev iz odstavka 2, se plovila takoj umaknejo najmanj pet morskih milj od položaja prejšnjega izvleka.
Whenever the total amounts of species subject to by ‑catch limits in any haul exceed the limits laid down in paragraph 2, whichever is applicable, vessels shall immediately move a minimum of five nautical miles away from the previous haul position.
Vedno, kadar skupna količina vrste, za katero veljajo omejitve prilova, v katerem koli naslednjem izvleku preseže navedene omejitve, se plovila takoj spet premaknejo najmanj pet morskih milj od prejšnjega položaja izvleka in se ne vrnejo na to območje najmanj 48 ur.
Whenever the total amounts of species subject to by ‑catch limits in any future haul exceed those limits, vessels shall again immediately move a minimum of five nautical miles away from the previous haul position and shall not return to the Area for at least 48 hours .
Deleži v odstavkih 1 in 2 se za vsako posamezno vrsto skupnega ulova, zadržanega na krovu, izračunajo kot masni odstotek.
The percentages in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be calculated as the percentage, by weight, for each species of the total catch retained on board.
Ulov severne kozice se pri izračunu deležev prilova pridnenih vrst rib ne upošteva .
Catches of shrimp shall not be included in the calculation of by-catch levels of groundfish species .
V primeru, da skupni prilov vseh vrst v katerem koli izvleku presega 5 masnih % v razdelku 3M in 2,5 % v razdelku 3L, se plovila, ki lovijo severno kozico (Pandalus borealis), takoj premaknejo najmanj pet morskih milj od položaja prejšnjega izvleka.
In the event that total by catches of all species in any haul exceed 5 % by weight in Division 3M and 2.5 % in Division 3L, vessels fishing for shrimp (Pandalus borealis), shall immediately move a minimum of 5 nautical miles from the position of the previous haul.
Ulov severne kozice se ne uporablja pri izračunu ravni prilova pridnenih vrst rib.
Catches of shrimp shall not be used in the calculation of by-catch level of groundfish species.
(Člen 31 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 41/2007 z dne 21. decembra 2006.)
(Article 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 of 21 December 2006)
Člen 4 a (novo)
Article 4 (a)
Člen 4 a
Article 4(a)
Prilov pri posameznem izvleku
By-catch in any one haul
Kadar deleži prilova pri posameznem izvleku presežejo deleže, določene v členu 4(1) in (2), se plovilo nemudoma premakne za najmanj 5 navtičnih milj od položaja med prejšnjo vleko in med vso naslednjo vleko ohrani razdaljo najmanj 10 navtičnih milj od položaja med prejšnjo vleko.
If the percentages of by-catches in any one haul exceed the percentages laid down in Article 4(1) and (2) the vessel shall immediately move a minimum of 5 nautical miles from any position of the previous tow and throughout the next tow keep a minimum distance of 10 nautical miles from any position of the previous tow.
Če plovilo pri naslednjem izvleku kljub premiku zopet preseže omejitve prilova, zapusti razdelek in se vsaj 60 ur ne vrne vanj.
If after moving, the next haul exceeds these by-catch limits the vessel shall leave the Division and not return for at least 60 hours.
Če pri ribolovu kozic skupni prilov vseh pridnenih vrst rib, za katere veljajo kvote, pri katerem koli izvleku po masi preseže 5 % v razdelku 3M ali 2,5 % v razdelku 3L, se plovilo premakne za najmanj 10 navtičnih milj od vseh položajev med predhodno vleko in med vso naslednjo vleko ohrani razdaljo najmanj 10 navtičnih milj od vseh položajev med prejšnjo vleko.
Should total by-catches of all ground fish species subject to quota in any haul in the shrimp fishery exceed 5 % by weight in Division 3M or 2,5 % by weight in Division 3L, the vessel shall move a minimum of 10 nautical miles from any position of the previous tow and throughout the next tow keep a minimum distance of 10 nautical miles from any position of the previous tow.
Delež prilova, dovoljenega pri enem izvleku, se pri tem izvleku za vsako posamezno vrsto skupnega ulova izračuna kot masni odstotek.
The percentage of by-catch authorised in any one haul shall be calculated as the percentage, by weight, for each species of the total catch in that haul.
(Člen 32 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 41/2007 z dne 21. decembra 2006.)
(Article 32 of Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 of 21 December 2006)
Člen 4 b (novo)
Article 4 (b)
Člen 4(b)
Article 4 (b)
Usmerjeni ribolov in prilov
Directed fishery and by-catch
Poveljniki plovil Skupnosti ne izvajajo usmerjenega ribolova vrst, za katere veljajo omejitve prilova.
Masters of Community vessels shall not conduct directed fisheries for species for which by-catch limits apply.
Kadar te vrste v posameznem izvleku predstavljajo največji masni odstotek skupnega ulova, velja, da se je izvajal usmerjeni ribolov.
A directed fishery for a species shall be considered to have been conducted when that species comprises the largest percentage by weight of the total catch in any one haul.
Kadar pa plovilo, ki izvaja usmerjeni ribolov raže z zanj predpisano velikostjo mrežnih očes, prvič pri enem izvleku ulovi vrste, za katere veljajo omejitve prilova, v obsegu, ki predstavlja največji masni odstotek skupnega ulova, to šteje kot naključni ulov.
However, when a vessel is conducting a directed fishery for skate with a legal mesh size appropriate for that fishery, the first time that, in a haul, catches of species for which by-catch limits apply comprise the largest percentage by weight of the total catch, they shall be considered as incidental.
V tem primeru plovilo nemudoma zamenja položaj v skladu s členom 4a(1) in (2).
In this event the vessel shall immediately change position in accordance with Article 4a(1) and (2).
Po odsotnosti iz razdelka, ki traja najmanj 60 ur, poveljniki plovil Skupnosti v skladu z določbami člena 4a(1) in (2) izvedejo poskusno vleko, ki ne traja več kot 3 ure.
Following an absence from a Division of at least 60 hours in accordance with the provisions of Article 4a(1) and (2), masters of Community vessels shall undertake a trial tow the duration of which shall not exceed 3 hours.
Če pri tem vrste, za katere veljajo omejitve prilova, pri enem izvleku obsegajo največji masni odstotek skupnega ulova, to z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 tega člena ne šteje kot usmerjeni ribolov.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, if in a haul from such a trial tow catches of species for which by-catch limits apply comprise the largest percentage by weight of the total catch, it shall not be considered as a directed fishery.
(Člen 33 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 41/2007 z dne 21. decembra 2006.)
(Article 33 of Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 of 21 December 2006)
Za neposredni ribolov raže ( Rajidae ) se ta velikost očes poveča na najmanj 280 mm v vreči in 220 mm na vseh drugih delih vlečne mreže.
For direct fishing of skates ( Rajidae ) this mesh size shall be increased to minimum of 280 mm in the cod‑end and 220 mm in all other parts of the trawl.
Uporaba vlečne mreže, ki ima v katerem koli predelu mrežna očesa velikosti manjše od 130 mm, je prepovedana pri neposrednem ribolovu vrst pridnenih rib iz Priloge I, razen za ribolov vrste Sebastes mentella iz odstavka 3 .
The use of trawl net having in any section thereof net meshes of dimensions less than 130 mm shall be prohibited for direct fishing of the groundfish species referred to in Annex I , except for fishing for Sebastes mentella as referred to in paragraph 3 .
Navedena velikost očes mreže se lahko zmanjša na najmanj 60 mm za neposredni ribolov severnega kratkoplavutega lignja (Illex illecebrosus).
That mesh size may be reduced to a minimum of 60 mm for direct fishing of short-finned squid ( Illex illecebrosus ).
Za neposredni ribolov raže (Rajidae) se navedena velikost očes poveča na najmanj 280 mm v vreči in 220 mm na vseh drugih delih vlečne mreže.
For direct fishing of skates ( Rajidae ) that mesh size shall be increased to a minimum of 280 mm in the cod-end and 220 mm in all other parts of the trawl.
Plovila, ki lovijo severno kozico ( Pandalus borealis ), uporabljajo mreže z velikostjo očes najmanj 40 mm .
Vessels fishing for shrimp ( Pandalus borealis ) shall use nets with a minimum mesh size of 40 mm.
Plovila, ki lovijo pelagičnega kljunatega okuna (Sebastes mentella) v podobmočju 2 in razdelkih 1F in 3K, uporabljajo mreže z velikostjo mrežnih očes najmanj 100 mm.
Vessels fishing for pelagic Sebastes mentella (Oceanic redfish) in Sub-Area 2 and Division 1F and 3K shall use nets with a minimum mesh size of 100 mm.
(Člen 29 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 41/2007 z dne 21. decembra 2006.)
(Article 29 of Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 of 21 December 2006)
Pri neposrednem ribolovu ene ali več vrst, naštetih v Prilogi I, plovila ne smejo imeti mrež z očesi, ki so manjša od tistih, določenih v členu 5.
When fishing directly for one or more of the species listed in Annex I, vessels may not carry nets with a mesh size smaller than that laid down in Article 5.
Pri neposrednem ribolovu ene ali več vrst, naštetih v Prilogi I, plovila Skupnosti ne smejo imeti mrež z očesi, ki so manjša od tistih, določenih v členu 29.
When fishing directly for one or more of the species listed in Annex I, Community vessels shall not carry nets with a mesh size smaller than that laid down in Article 29.