natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice morajo tudi pregledati in, če je to potrebno, v zakone ali notranjo prakso uvesti pravico do ugovora ali drug enakovreden ukrep, ki bo omogočil hiter popravek netočnih informacij, razširjenih preko avdiovizualnih in informacijskih on-line storitev, po minimalnih načelih, ki so predstavljena spodaj, ne glede na možnost prirediti izvajanje te pravice (ali drugega enakovrednega ukrepa) v skladu s posebnostmi vsake vrste medija.
- Provision should be made for procedures whereby disputes as to the exercise of the right of reply or the equivalent remedies could be subject to judicial review.
Področje uporabe pravice do ugovora
Scope of the right of reply
Vsaki fizični ali pravni osebi, ne glede na nacionalno pripadnost ali stalno prebivališče, se prizna pravica do ugovora ali enakovrednega ukrepa ter tako omogoči odziv na vsako informacijo v avdiovizualnih in informacijskih on-line storitvah , ki predstavlja neresnična dejstva v zvezi z njeno osebo in krati njene osebne pravice.
Any natural or legal person, irrespective of nationality or residence, should be given a right of reply or an equivalent remedy offering a possibility to react to any information in audiovisual and on-line information services presenting inaccurate facts about him or her and affecting his or her personal rights.
Ugovor mora imeti enako težo, kot sporna informacija, da popravljena informacija doseže isto ciljno skupino in enak učinek, kot prvotna informacija.
The reply should be given the same prominence as was given to the contested information in order for it to reach the same public and with the same impact.
Države članice zagotovijo, da uvedba nesmiselnih pogojev ne ovira učinkovitega izvajanja pravice do ugovora (ali enakovrednih ukrepov) in pravice do svobode izražanja.
Member States should ensure that the effective exercise of the right of reply or equivalent remedy and the right of freedom of expression is not unjustifiably hampered.
Odgovor je treba poslati v razumnem časovnem obdobju po utemeljitvi zahteve, v nekem trenutku in na ustrezen način glede na objavo ali oddajo, za katero velja zahteva.
The reply must be forwarded within a reasonable time after justification of the request and at a time and in a manner appropriate to the publication or broadcast to which the request refers.
Predvideni bodo postopki za uvedbo možnosti zatekanja k pravnim sredstvom v primeru sporov v zvezi z izvajanjem pravice do ugovora ali enakovrednih ukrepov.
Provision should be made for procedures whereby disputes as to the exercise of the right of reply or the equivalent remedies could be subject to judicial review.
o predlogu priporočila Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zaščiti mladoletnikov in človekovega dostojanstva in pravici do odgovora v zvezi s konkurenčnostjo evropske avdiovizualne industrije in industrije informacijskih storitev
on the proposal for a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of minors and human dignity and the right of reply in relation to the competitiveness of the European audiovisual and information services industry
3. oktobra 1989 je Svet sprejel Direktivo 89/552/EGS
On 3 October 1989 the Council adopted Directive 89/552/EEC
UL L 298, 17.10.1998, str.
OJ L 298, 17.10.1989, p.
23. o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov.
23. on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities.
Ta direktiva je splošno znana kot direktiva o „televiziji brez meja“.
This directive is commonly known as the ‘Television without Frontiers’ Directive.
Izbrana pravna podlaga je bil člen 57(2) nekdanje Pogodbe ES (zdaj člen 47 prečiščenega besedila pogodb), ki obravnava lajšanje dostopa do samozaposlitvenih dejavnosti na osnovi, da televizijsko oddajanje pomeni storitev.
The legal basis chosen was Article 57(2) of the former EC Treaty (now Article 47 in the consolidated version of the Treaties), which concerns facilitating access to self-employed activities, on the basis that television broadcasting constitutes a service.
Ta direktiva je ključnega pomena ne samo s stališča njenih gospodarskih posledic na zadevne sektorje, ampak predvsem, po mojem mnenju, zaradi njene začetne vloge na ravni Skupnosti: (a) v poglavju V, o zaščiti mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi vsebinami programov in pred oglaševanjem, ki je lahko škoduje njihovemu celotnemu razvoju; (b) v poglavju VI, ki priznava pravico do odgovora ljudem, katerih pravice so bile kršene z nepravilno trditvijo v televizijskem programu.
This directive is of crucial importance not only from the point of view of its economic repercussions on the sectors concerned but chiefly, in my view, because of its pioneering role at Community level: (a) in Chapter V, on the protection of minors against harmful content in programmes and against advertising which might be prejudicial to their integral development; (b) in Chapter VI, which recognises the right of reply for people whose rights have been harmed by an incorrect assertion in a television programme.
UL L 202, 30.7.1997. z namenom, da upošteva tehnološki razvoj in razvoj trga, in dopolnjena z Direktivo 2000/31/ES z dne 8. junija 2000
60 with the aim of taking account of both technological and market developments, and it was rounded off by Directive 2000/31/EC of 8 June 2000
UL L 178, 17.7.2000, str.
OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p.
1. o elektronskem poslovanju na notranjem trgu.
1. on electronic commerce in the internal market.
Vendar je bilo prvo besedilo, ki je obravnavalo zadeve, povezane z zaščito mladoletnikov in človekovega dostojanstva v avdiovizualnih in informacijskih storitvah, in je bilo ponujeno javnosti na ravni Skupnosti, ne glede na obliko dobave, Priporočilo Sveta 98/560/ES z dne 24. septembra 1998
Nevertheless, the first text to deal with matters linked to the protection of minors and human dignity in audiovisual and information services offered to the public at Community level, whatever form of delivery is involved, was Council Recommendation 98/560/EC of 24 September 1998
UL L 270, 07.10.1998, str.
OJ L 270, 7.10.1998, p.
48. o razvoju konkurenčnosti evropske avdiovizualne industrije in industrije informacijskih storitev, v skladu s členom 157 Pogodbe ES.
48. on the development of the competitiveness of the European audiovisual and information services industry, pursuant to Article 157 of the EC Treaty.
Uporabo Priporočila 98/560/ES v državah članicah je prvič ocenila Komisija leta 2000 in nato leta 2003 v dveh ocenjevalnih poročilih
The application of Recommendation 98/560/EC in the Member States was evaluated by the Commission first in 2000 and subsequently in 2003 in two evaluation reports
KOM(2001)106 z dne 27.2.2001 in KOM(2003)776 z dne 14.12.2003. .
COM(2001)106 of 27.2.2001 and COM(2003)776 of 12.12.2003. .
Glede na rezultate in predloge, poudarjene v teh ocenjevalnih poročilih in na javnih posvetih o Direktivi 97/36/ES z dne 30. junija 1997, ki spreminja Direktivo 89/552/EGS (direktiva o „televiziji brez meja“), je Komisija predložila ta predlog priporočila z namenom, da bi dopolnila Priporočilo 98/560/ES in ga posodobila, da bi upošteval velik tehnološki napredek, dosežen od takrat, in veliko razširitev prepovedanih in škodljivih vsebin, ki se vsak dan širijo prek vseh medijev, zlasti prek radia, televizije in interneta.
In view of the results and suggestions outlined in these evaluation reports and in public consultation on Directive 97/36/EC of 30 June 1997 amending Directive 89/552/EEC (‘Television Without Frontiers’ Directive), the Commission has submitted the present proposal for a recommendation with the aim of complementing Recommendation 98/560/EC and updating it to take account of the huge technological progress made since then and the great proliferation of illicit and harmful content distributed every day through all the media, particularly radio, television and the Internet.
II – OCENA PREDLOGA PRIPOROČILA
II - ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION
Ob prvotni obravnavi vaša poročevalka zavzema stališče, da ta predlog priporočila predstavlja korak naprej v primerjavi s Priporočilom 98/560/ES in ga dopolnjuje, ker priporoča, da države članice, avdiovizualna industrija in industrija informacijskih storitev ter druge zadevne strani:
On initial consideration, your draftswoman takes the view that this proposal for a recommendation represents a step forward by comparison with Recommendation 98/560/EC and provides a complement to it in that it recommends that the Member States, audiovisual and information services industries and other parties concerned:
(a) zagotovijo, da ima vsaka oseba pravico do odgovora na netočne podatke, razširjene s katerim koli sredstvom, ki lahko škoduje njenemu legitimnemu interesu;
(a) guarantee that any person has the right of reply to inaccurate information disseminated through any type of medium which might harm their legitimate interests;
(b) spodbujajo izobraževalne programe na področju informacijskih medijev za starše, učitelje in vzgojitelje, katerih namen je učiti mladoletnike, kako naj primerno uporabljajo informacijske medije;
(b) promote information media education programmes designed to enable parents, teachers and trainers to teach minors to make proper use of the information media;
(c) preprečujejo kakršno koli diskriminacijo na podlagi spola, rasne ali etnične pripadnosti, vere ali prepričanja, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti in se bojujejo proti njej.
(c) avoid any discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, and combat such discrimination.
Vaša poročevalka predlaga naslednje predloge sprememb na teh področjih: predlogi sprememb 8, 20 in 23 za razvoj zakonitega orodja proti diskriminaciji; predlogi sprememb 9, 10, 11 in 19 za razvoj izobraževalnih programov na področju medijev; predloga sprememb 12 in 17 za izboljšanje možnosti pravice odgovora ali enakovrednega pravnega sredstva za ljudi, ki menijo, da so jim netočni podatki povzročili škodo; predlogi sprememb 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20 in 22 za zagotovitev natančne razmejitve obsega priporočila.
Your draftswoman proposes the following amendments in these areas: Amendments 8, 20 and 26 to develop a legal tool against discrimination; Amendments 9, 10, 11, 19 and 21 to develop media education and information programmes; Amendments 12, 17 and 22 to improve the possibilities of a right of reply or equivalent remedy for people who feel they have been harmed by inaccurate information; Amendments 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20 and 24 to provide a precise demarcation of the scope of the recommendation, and Amendment 25 to create filters with a view to shielding minors from child pornography and other types of material which constitute an assault on human dignity.
Vendar vaša poročevalka zavzema stališče, da zaščita mladoletnikov in spoštovanje načela človekovega dostojanstva v medijih in informacijskih storitvah trpita zaradi resnih pomanjkljivosti na ravni Skupnosti, predvsem iz dveh razlogov:
Nevertheless, your draftswoman takes the view that the protection of minors and respect for the principle of human dignity in the media and information services suffer from serious shortcomings at Community level, essentially for two reasons:
(a) prvič, ker je paradoksno, da mora biti pravna podlaga, izbrana v Pogodbi ES za zaščito mladoletnikov in zagotavljanje spoštovanja človekovega dostojanstva, člen 157, ki je namenjen zagotavljanju konkurenčnosti evropske industrije;
(a) first, because it is paradoxical that the legal basis chosen in the EC Treaty to protect minors and guarantee respect for human dignity should be Article 157, which is geared to ensuring the competitiveness of European industry;
(b) drugič, ker je izbrana pravna oblika „priporočilo“, čigar obvezna vsebina, pravno izvršljiva pred sodišči, pravzaprav ne obstaja.
(b) secondly, because the legal form chosen is a ‘recommendation’ whose mandatory content legally enforceable before the courts is practically zero.
Zato je vaša poročevalka vstavila predloge sprememb od 1 do 6 in meni, da je člen 153 Pogodbe ES, ki obravnava zaščito interesov potrošnikov, več kot zadosten kot pravna podlaga, da Skupnost sprejme direktivo za uskladitev zakonodaje v zvezi z vsemi mediji in elektronskimi informacijskimi storitvami o zaščiti mladoletnikov, spoštovanju načela človekovega dostojanstva in zagotovljeni pravici do odgovora ali enakovrednega pravnega sredstva proti netočnim podatkom, razširjenim s temi mediji.
For this reason your draftswoman has inserted Amendments 1 to 6 and considers Article 153 of the EC Treaty, which refers to protecting the interests of consumers, to be more than sufficient as a legal basis for the Community to adopt a directive harmonising legislation in relation to all the media and electronic information services on protection for minors, respect for the principle of human dignity and a guaranteed right of reply or equivalent remedy against any inaccurate information disseminated through these media.
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za kulturo in izobraževanje kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Culture and Education, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(-1) Listina o temeljnih pravicah EU, vključena v del II Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo, priznava v členu 1 nedotakljivost človekovega dostojanstva, ko navaja, da ga je treba spoštovati in varovati.
(-1) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, incorporated into Part II of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe , recognises under Article 1 the inviolability of human dignity, stating that it must be respected and protected.
(-1b) Človekovo dostojanstvo je neodtujljivo, ne dopušča izključitve ali omejitve ter je temelj in izvor vseh pravnih sredstev, pripravljenih na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni za varovanje človekovih pravic.
(-1b) Human dignity is inalienable, it does not admit any exclusion or limitation and it constitutes the foundation and origin of all legal instruments drawn up at national and international level to protect human rights.
Uvodna izjava –1 e (novo)
Recital -1 e (new)
(-1e) Uporabo istih določb, določenih v Pogodbi o Ustavi za Evropo, je treba spodbujati za zagotovitev skupne stopnje varovanja temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji.
(-1e) The application of some of the provisions laid down in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe needs to be brought forward in order to ensure a common level of protection for fundamental rights in the European Union.
Čeprav pogodba še ni bila ratificirana ali še ni začela veljati, navaja skrbi in ambicije Evropske unije za prihodnost in mora zato voditi k ukrepom, ki jih je treba nujno sprejeti, ne da bi čakali na začetek njene veljavnosti ob daljnem datumu.
Even though the Treaty has not yet been ratified or entered into force, it nevertheless sets out the European Union’s concerns and ambitions for the future and it should consequently inspire measures which need to be taken urgently, without awaiting its entry into force at a distant date.
To še zlasti velja za ukrepe v zvezi z zaščito mladoletnikov.
This is particularly true of measures relating to the protection of minors.
Uvodna izjava –1 f (novo)
Recital -1 f (new)
(-1f) Zaradi neustavljivega razvoja novih informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij mora Evropska skupnost na tem področju nujno zagotoviti popolno in primerno zaščito varstva potrošnikov, in sicer s sprejetjem direktive, ki bo na njenem ozemlju na eni strani zagotovil prosto dobavo in opravljanje informacijskih storitev, na drugi pa bo zagotovil, da je njihova vsebina zakonita, spoštuje načelo človekovega dostojanstva in ne škoduje celotnemu razvoju mladoletnikov.
(-1f) The unstoppable development of new information and communication technologies makes it urgent for the European Community to guarantee full and adequate protection for consumers’ interests in this field by adopting a directive which will guarantee throughout its territory the free delivery and provision of information services on the one hand, and on the other hand will guarantee that their content is licit, respects the principle of human dignity and does not impair the integral development of minors.
Prvič, te storitve spadajo pod pojem prostega opravljanja storitev, kot je določeno v sodni praksi Sodišča.
Firstly, these services fall under the concept of the free provision of services, as established in the case law of the Court of Justice.
Drugič, Skupnost mora v tem sektorju zaščititi 450 milijonov potrošnikov Skupnosti, kot je določeno v členu 153 Pogodbe ES, pred nezakonito vsebino v informacijah, ki prehajajo meje držav članic in kršijo spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva.
The same directive should also lay down appropriate measures providing adequate protection for the physical, mental and moral development of minors when using any of the information media now available on the market.
Priporočilo Sveta 98/560/ES z dne 24. septembra 1998 o razvoju konkurenčnosti evropske avdiovizualne industrije in industrije informacijskih storitev s spodbujanjem nacionalnih okvirov za dosego primerljive in učinkovite ravni zaščite mladoletnikov in človeškega dostojanstva, je prvo pravno sredstvo na ravni Skupnosti v zvezi z vsebino avdiovizualnih in informacijskih storitev, ki zajemajo vse oblike dobave, od radiodifuzije do interneta.
(1) Council Recommendation 98/560/EC of 24 September 1998 on the development of the competitiveness of the European audiovisual and information services industry by promoting national frameworks aimed at achieving a comparable and effective level of protection of minors and human dignity is the first legal instrument at Community level concerning the content of audiovisual and information services covering all forms of delivery, from broadcasting to the Internet.
Priporočilo Sveta 98/560/ES z dne 24. septembra 1998 o razvoju konkurenčnosti evropske avdiovizualne industrije in industrije informacijskih storitev s spodbujanjem nacionalnih okvirov za dosego primerljive in učinkovite ravni zaščite mladoletnikov in človeškega dostojanstva, je prvo pravno sredstvo na ravni Skupnosti, ki obravnava vprašanja povezana z zaščito mladoletnikov in človekovega dostojanstva v zvezi z vsebino vseh avdiovizualnih in informacijskih storitev, ponujenih javnosti v kateri koli obliki dobave, od radiodifuzije do interneta.
(1) Council Recommendation 98/560/EC of 24 September 1998 on the development of the competitiveness of the European audiovisual and information services industry by promoting national frameworks aimed at achieving a comparable and effective level of protection of minors and human dignity is the first legal instrument at Community level which concerns questions linked to the protection of minors and human dignity in relation to the content of all audiovisual and information services offered to the public, in whatever form of delivery, from broadcasting to the Internet.
Priporočilo Sveta 98/560/ES je prvo pravno sredstvo na ravni Skupnosti glede vsebine vseh informacijskih ter avdiovizualnih storitev in vprašanj, povezanih z zaščito mladoletnikov in spoštovanjem človekovega dostojanstva v zvezi s to vsebino.
Council Recommendation 98/560/EC is indeed the first legal instrument at Community level in terms of both the content of all information and audiovisual services, and of questions linked to the protection of minors and respect for human dignity in relation to this content.
Vendar se ne sme pozabiti, da je bilo prvo pravno sredstvo, sprejeto na področju avdiovizualnih storitev, direktiva o „televiziji brez meja“ iz leta 1989, ki je bila nato revidirana leta 1997.
Nevertheless, it should not be forgotten that the first legal instrument adopted in the field of audiovisual services was the 1989 ‘Television without Frontiers’ Directive, subsequently revised in 1997.
(1a) Evropska skupnost je že ukrepala na področju avdiovizualnih in informacijskih storitev, da bi ustvarila potrebne pogoje za zagotovitev prostega pretoka televizijskega oddajanja in drugih informacijskih storitev, ob spoštovanju načel svobodne konkurence in svobode izražanja, vendar pa mora na tem področju ukrepati bolj odločno, da bi se določili pravni predpisi in sprejeli tudi ukrepi za boj in zaščito uporabnikov pred spodbujanjem diskriminacije, ki temelji na spolu, rasni ali etnični pripadnosti, veri ali prepričanju, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolni usmerjenosti.
(1a) The European Community has already intervened in the field of audiovisual and information services in order to create the necessary conditions to ensure the free movement of television broadcasts and other information services, respecting the principles of free competition and freedom of expression and information, but it should intervene with greater determination in this area with the aim of laying down a set of legal provisions, also adopting measures to combat and protect consumers from incitement to discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
(5) Zaradi medijskega okolja, ki se pod vplivom novih tehnologij in medijskih novosti neprestano spreminja, je treba otroke in tudi starše nujno naučiti učinkovite uporabe medijev.
(5) The changing media landscape, resulting from new technologies and media innovation, makes it necessary to teach children, and also parents, to use the media effectively.
(5) Zaradi medijskega okolja, ki se pod vplivom novih tehnologij in medijskih novosti neprestano spreminja, je treba otroke in tudi starše , učitelje in vzgojitelje nujno naučiti učinkovite uporabe vseh medijev , še zlasti avdiovizualnih in informacijskih storitev, ne glede na obliko, v kateri so posredovane .
(5) The changing media landscape, resulting from new technologies and media innovation, makes it necessary to teach children, and also parents , teachers and trainers , to use all the media effectively , in particular audiovisual and information services, whatever their form of delivery .
Eksponentna rast tehnološkega napredka pomeni, da je poleg otrok in staršev nujno treba izobraziti posebno učitelje in vzgojitelje – glede na njihovo oblikujočo vlogo v družbi – na področju pravilne uporabe medijev ter zlasti avdiovizualnih in informacijskih storitev.
The exponential pace of technological progress means that there is an urgent need to teach not only children and parents but especially - given their formative role in society - teachers and trainers to make proper use of the media, and in particular audiovisual and information services.
Treba je upoštevati tudi, da namen priporočila pokriva avdiovizualne in informacijske storitve na splošno, ne glede na obliko ali tehnični medij, ki se uporablja za njihovo dobavo.
It should also be taken into account that the scope of the recommendation covers audiovisual and information services in general, whatever the form or technical medium used for their delivery.
(5a) Ker bo prihod prizemne digitalne televizije omogočil starševski nadzor, ki je nujen za preprečevanje dostopa otrok do televizijske vsebine proti želji staršev, mora Evropska unija voditi postopek prehoda na prizemno digitalno televizijo z namenom skrajšanja roka za „analogni izpad“ kolikor je mogoče.
(5a) Given that the arrival of terrestrial digital television will make parental monitoring possible, which is essential if children are to be prevented from gaining access to televised content against their parents' wishes, the European Union should guide the process of transition to terrestrial digital television under the aim of shortening the deadline for 'analog blackout' as much as possible.