natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Skrajni čas je, da se pri tem upošteva tudi skladnost notranje in zunanje politike.
In this context, it is high time to pay more attention to the consistency between internal and external policies.
Izkušnje kažejo, da postanejo evropski standardi, če so sprejeti soglasno, model za rešitve tudi pri trgovinskih partnerjih.
Experience shows that, where there is agreement on European standards, these often become the reference model for solutions with our trading partners.
Zato je čim večje soglasje o evropskih standardih potrebno tudi z vidika mednarodne konkurenčnosti.
The widest possible degree of agreement on European standards is therefore also essential from the point of view of international competitiveness.
Pri določanju evropskih predpisov in standardov je treba vedno upoštevati vpliv na konkurenčnost v svetovnem okviru.
When creating European rules and standards, the impact on competitiveness on the global scale should always be considered.
Poleg tega je treba vnaprej preveriti, kateri standardi veljajo pri trgovinskih partnerjih Unije in v kolikšni meri je možno prevzeti uveljavljeno prakso ali najti združljivo evropsko rešitev.
In addition, it should always be verified beforehand what standards apply with the Union’s trading partners and whether the adoption of established practices or even a compatible European solution are possible.
Svetovne standarde je najbolje določiti mnogostransko, po možnosti pa vsaj večstransko.
Global standards are best agreed multilaterally but at least, as far as possible, plurilaterally.
Učinkovita zaščita intelektualne lastnine
Effective protection for intellectual property
Po ocenah znaša škoda zaradi piratstva izdelkov do 659 milijard EUR, oziroma od 5 do 9 % svetovne trgovine
It is estimated that product piracy causes damage to the tune of € 659 billion or between 5% and 9% of world trade
Wildemann, Horst et al., Plagiatschutz - Handlungsspielräume der produzierenden Industrie gegen Produktpiraterie, München , 1 izdaja, 2007, str.
Wildemann, Horst et al., ‘Plagiatschutz - Handlungsspielräume der produzierenden Industrie gegen Produktpiraterie’, Munich, first edition, 2007, p.
Zlasti so prizadeta evropska podjetja.
European businesses are particularly affected.
Zato je treba na mnogostranski in dvostranski ravni dosledno uveljavljati in predvsem izvajati pravice intelektualne lastnine.
Consistent enforcement and above all implementation of intellectual property rights are therefore required at both multilateral and bilateral levels.
Komisija in države članice morajo še okrepiti svoja dosedanja prizadevanja.
The Commission and the Member States really must step up their existing efforts.
Boljši dostop do trga za podjetja iz Unije
Achieving better market access for businesses from the Union
Evropska unija je med najbolj odprtimi trgi na svetu.
The European Union has one of the most open markets worldwide.
Žal pa se podjetja iz Unije pogosto srečujejo s tarifnimi, še pogosteje pa z netarifnimi trgovinskimi ovirami.
Unfortunately, businesses from the Union are often confronted not only with tariff barriers but also increasingly with non-tariff barriers to trade.
V preteklih pogajalskih krogih so bili pogosto v ospredju ukrepi za odpravo carin, sedaj pa se je treba bolj osredotočiti na netarifne trgovinske ovire.
Whilst past trade rounds focused to a large extent on measures to phase out customs duties, the focus must now shift more to the non-tariff barriers to trade.
Po terorističnih napadih 11. septembra 2001 so bili uvedeni številni varnostni ukrepi, ki pa pogosto zelo obremenjujejo posamezna podjetja ter ovirajo trgovinske tokove.
Since the terror attacks of 11 September 2001 a large number of security-related measures have been introduced which often impose considerable burdens on the businesses concerned and hamper trade flows.
Tukaj je treba ponovno doseči ravnovesje med upravičenimi varnostnimi vprašanji in trgovinskimi interesi.
A new sense of proportion must be aimed for here which strikes a balance between legitimate security concerns and trading interests.
Domnevna varnostna pravila ne smejo postati netarifne trgovinske ovire 21. stoletja.
Supposed security rules must not be allowed to become the non-tariff trade barriers of the 21st century.
Odprtje trgov javnih naročil
Opening up public procurement markets
Unija ima s svojo relativno odprtostjo na trgu javnih naročil tudi v mednarodnem pogledu sorazmerno poseben položaj.
With the relative openness of its public procurement markets, the Union does enjoy a relatively special status by international comparison.
Treba je zavzeto pristopiti k pogajanjem, da bi pri trgovinskih partnerjih dosegli vzajemnost pri odprtju trgov.
Negotiations should be stepped up to achieve reciprocity in the opening of markets on the part of trading partners.
Tu je še naprej edina možnost strategija Komisije, da opozori, da bodo po potrebi uvedene vzajemne omejitve dostopa.
In so doing, there is still no alternative to the Commission strategy of pointing out that, where necessary, reciprocal access restrictions will be introduced.
Hkrati je treba preprečiti pretirane zahteve, ki jih je mogoče zlorabiti za zaprtje trga javnih naročil v Evropi v smislu protekcionizma.
However, exaggerated demands that could be misused in order to close procurement markets in Europe as a protectionist step should be avoided.
Cilj mora biti odprtje trgov v drugih gospodarstvih.
The aim must be for other economies to open up their markets.
Ohraniti učinkovitost instrumentov trgovinske zaščite
Preserving the effectiveness of trade defence instruments
Ob vse večji liberalizaciji je za Evropsko unijo nujno potrebno, da se lahko v kratkem času učinkovito zaščiti pred nepošteno trgovinsko prakso.
Against a background of growing liberalisation it is absolutely essential for the European Union to be able to defend itself at short notice and effectively from unfair trade practices.
Instrumenti trgovinske zaščite, ki jih ima Evropska unija, se so načeloma izkazali za učinkovite v boju proti dampingu in nekaterim subvencijam.
The European Union’s trade defence instruments have generally speaking proved their worth in the fight against dumping and some subsidies.
Pri tem je treba jasno razlikovati med protikonkurenčnim, monopolnim dampingom, ter oblikami cenovnega dampinga v skladu s konkurenčnimi pravili.
A clear distinction needs to be made between anti-competitive, monopoly-oriented dumping and forms of price dumping that are in line with competition rules.
Protidampinške ukrepe je treba uvesti le pri protikonkurenčnem dampingu.
Only anti-competitive dumping should be tackled with anti-dumping measures.
Če je tako početje mogoče dokazati in škoduje evropskim podjetjem, je treba hitro uvesti učinkovite ukrepe, da se prepreči izkrivljanje trga.
Where such practices can be proved and European businesses are being harmed, effective measures must be taken at short notice to avoid distortion of the market.
Na ravni Svetovne trgovinske organizacije ta čas tečejo pogajanja o instrumentih trgovinske zaščite, tako da javno posvetovanje, sproženo z zeleno knjigo
At WTO level, negotiations are currently taking place on trade defence instruments, and the discussion process initiated by the relevant Green Paper
"Evropski instrumenti trgovinske zaščite v spreminjajočem se globalnem gospodarstvu" KOM(2006)0763 . , poteka ob najbolj neugodnem času.
‘Europe’s trade defence instruments in a changing global economy’ COM(2006)0763 . comes therefore at the most unfavourable time imaginable.
Glavna tema posvetovanja bi morala biti predvsem reforma postopkov, cilj pa nepristranski sistem presoje ter sprejemanje odločitev čim bolj neodvisno od političnih zadev.
This process should focus above all on the reform of procedures and set out to achieve an objective system of evaluation and decision-making which should be as free as possible of political considerations.
Ker ima Evropska unija v primerjavi s tekmeci razmeroma liberalne mehanizme trgovinske zaščite, nadaljnja omilitev določb ne pride v poštev.
Since the European Union by comparison with our competitors has at its disposal comparatively liberal trade defence mechanisms, there should be no attempt at further relaxation of the implementing provisions.
Reforma institucionalnega okvirja
Reforming the institutional framework
Trgovinska politika Evropske unije daljnosežno vpliva na življenje njenih državljanov.
The European Union’s trade policy has a far-reaching influence on the life of its citizens.
Zato je potrebno dejavnejše sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta, da se poveča demokratična legitimnost odločitev.
Greater involvement of the European Parliament is therefore necessary in order to strengthen the democratic legitimacy of decision-making.
Pomembna vprašanja, kot so trgovinski sporazumi, ki vplivajo na notranjo politiko ali določbe na področju instrumentov trgovinske zaščite, je treba vključiti v postopek soodločanja, kot predvideva tudi osnutek pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo.
Important issues such as trade agreements that impact on internal policies or arrangements concerning trade defence instruments should be transferred to the codecision procedure as is also envisaged in the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe.
o globalizirani Evropi – zunanji vidiki konkurenčnosti
on Global Europe – External aspects of competitiveness
5. meni, da so menjalni tečaji pomemben dejavnik v mednarodni trgovini; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga konkretne predloge glede ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti, če menjalni tečaji ogrožajo konkurenčnost EU, in naj preuči možnost vključitve takih ukrepov pri prihodnji reviziji instrumentov trgovinske zaščite EU;
Notes that exchange rates are a major factor in the development of international trade; calls on the Commission to make concrete proposals on measures to be taken when exchange rates are such as to undermine the EU's competitiveness, and to consider the inclusion of such measures in the upcoming revision of the EU's trade defence instruments;
8. poudarja, da so glavni razlog za gospodarski uspeh EU dejavnosti malih in srednje velikih podjetij (MSP), ki imajo proizvodnjo v EU, in da morajo ta podjetja obdržati visokokakovostno proizvodnjo na vrhu vrednostnih verig;
Emphasises that the main reason for the EU’s economic success is the activity of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that produce within the EU and which must be enabled to maintain high-quality production at the upper end of value chains;
11. meni, da poziv Komisije k boljšemu „usklajevanju pravnih ureditev“ s trgovskimi partnerji ne sme povzročiti znižanja standardov EU; nasprotno vztraja, da se morajo evropska merila prek trgovine širiti še bolj, kot so se do sedaj, zlasti z ozirom na nedavna dogajanja na čezatlantskem področju (prevzemi borz, IFRS (Mednarodni standardi računovodskega poročanja) itd.);
Deems it essential that the Commission’s call for more ‘regulatory convergence’ with trading partners does not lead to the downgrading of EU standards; insists, on the contrary, that through trade European standards must be disseminated to a greater extent than hitherto, particularly in the light of recent transatlantic developments (acquisition of stock markets, IFRS, etc.);
13. meni, da bi tržišča s promocijo EU temeljnih večstranskih pravil na področju konkurenčne politike in okrepitev mednarodnega sodelovanja na tem področju lahko postala bolj odprta, uravnotežena in učinkovita;
Believes that if the EU were to promote basic multilateral rules on competition policy and that if international cooperation in this area were to be strengthened, markets could be made more open, balanced, and efficient;
16. zlasti vztraja, da mora EU za povečanje svoje zunanje konkurenčnosti v sklopu trgovinske politike sprejeti ukrepe za okrepitev varnosti elektronskih transakcij in trgovinskih izmenjav ter za izboljšanje zaščito podatkov;
Maintains, in particular, that in order to increase its external competitiveness, the EU must take measures under its commercial policy to strengthen the security of electronic transactions and trade and improve data protection;
Globalizirana Evropa – zunanji vidiki konkurenčnosti
Global Europe - External aspects of competitiveness
Globalna Evropa – zunanji vidiki konkurenčnosti
Global Europe - external aspects of competitiveness
o vplivu in posledicah strukturnih politik na kohezijo EU
on the impact and effects of the structural policies on EU cohesion
– ob upoštevanju projektov teritorialne agende EU in leipziške listine,
– having regard to the EU’s draft Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o oblikovanju „Evrope inovacij” (poročilo Aho), ki ga je skupina neodvisnih strokovnjakov za raziskave, razvoj in inovacije oblikovala po neuradnem srečanju predsednikov držav ali vlad v Hampton Courtu 20. januarja 2006,
– having regard to the report of 20 January 2006 by the Independent Expert Group on R&D and Innovation appointed following the informal meeting of heads of state and government at Hampton Court, ‘Creating an Innovative Europe’ (the Aho Group report),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisija z dne 12. junija 2006 z naslovom „Strategija za rast in delovna mesta ter reforma evropske kohezijske politike - Četrto poročilo o napredku glede kohezije”( KOM(2006)0281 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 12 June 2006, ‘The Growth and Jobs Strategy and the Reform of European cohesion policy – Fourth progress report on cohesion’ ( COM(2006)0281 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. februarja 2002 o drugem poročilu Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o ekonomski in socialni koheziji
– having regard to its resolution of 7 February 2002, on the Commission’s second report to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on economic and social cohesion
UL C 284, 21.11.2002, str.
OJ C 284 E, 21.11.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 28. septembra 2005 o vlogi teritorialne kohezije v regionalnem razvoju
– having regard to its resolution of 28 September 2005, on the role of territorial cohesion in regional development
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. decembra 2005 o vlogi neposredne državne pomoči kot orodju regionalnega razvoja
– having regard to its resolution of 15 December 2005, on the role of direct State aid as a tool of regional development
UL L 286 E, 23.11.06, str.
OJ C 286, 23.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2005 o predlogu uredbe Sveta o ustanovitvi kohezijskega sklada
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2005, on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Cohesion Fund
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2005 o predlogu za uredbo Sveta s splošnimi določbami o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2005, on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 4. julija 2005 o predlogu uredbe Sveta o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu in razveljavitvi uredbe (ES) št. 1260/1999
– having regard to its position of 4 July 2006, on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0150/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0150/2007 ),
A. ker kohezijska politika nesporno koristi povezovanju na socialnem, gospodarskem in ozemeljskem področju ter izboljšanju ravni upravljanja na lokalni in regionalni ravni;
A. whereas it is indisputable that the cohesion policy is having a positive impact on cohesion in the areas of social, economic and regional policy and in terms of better quality governance at local and regional level,
B. ker se ta novi pozitivni učinek razlikuje od regije do regije, zato se želi s tem poročilom podati priporočila za dosego najboljših možnih učinkov v novem programskem obdobju;
B. whereas because that positive impact varies from one region to another, this report aims to put forward recommendations for maximising its impact in the new programming period,
C. ker se trenutno oblikujejo projekti teritorialne agende EU in leipziške listine, ki jih bo mogoče sprejeti na neuradnem ministrskem srečanju o urbanem razvoju in ozemeljski koheziji 24. in 25. maja 2007 v Leipzigu;
C. whereas the drafts for the EU’s Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter are being drawn up for adoption at the informal ministerial meeting on urban development and regional cohesion to be held in Leipzig on 24 and 25 May 2007,
D. ker je za večji učinek strukturnih skladov na kohezijo Evropske unije treba povečati vlogo malih in srednje velikih podjetij pri raziskavah, razvoju in inovacijah ter njihov dostop do storitev, ki jih nudijo javne ustanove, ki se posvečajo raziskavam;
D. whereas to improve the structural funds’ impact on EU cohesion small businesses need to play a larger role in research, development and innovation (R+D+i) activities and in the access to R+D+i services in public institutions dedicated to research,
E. ker je po podatkih iz prej omenjenega četrtega vmesnega kohezijskega poročila letna rast BDP na prebivalca za obdobje 1995-2002 v trinajstih kohezijskih državah znašala 3,6 % in je bila tako višja od rasti v petnajsterici EU, ki je znašala 2,2 %;
E. whereas, according to the above Fourth progress report on cohesion, between 1995 and 2005 GDP per capita growth in the 13 cohesion countries was greater than that of the Europe of Fifteen, with an annual rate of 3.6 % compared with 2.2 % per annum for the latter,
F. ker vsak evro, ki se v EU porabi za kohezijsko politiko, ustvari povprečno za 0,90 evra dodatnih stroškov v najmanj razvitih regijah (cilj 1) in za 3 evre dodatnih stroškov v regijah, ki so v procesu preoblikovanja (cilj 2);
F. whereas every euro spent in the EU on cohesion policies generates an average of 0.90 euros of additional spending in less developed regions (Objective 1) and 3.00 euros in regions undergoing redevelopment (Objective 2),
G. ker pri ustvarjanju kohezije ne morajo veljati le svobodna pravila igre tržnih sil, kot so si to zamislili ustanovitelji Evrope, temveč so potrebni javni posegi, ki omogočajo vzpostavitev ponovnega ravnotežja med regijami;
G. whereas the free play of market forces is not enough to create the cohesion that Europe’s founders were seeking, and whereas that cohesion necessarily requires public actions to enable the balance between regions to be restored,
H. ker imajo strukturne politike pomembno vlogo pri krepitvi ozemeljske kohezije in se bodo morale prilagoditi novim ozemeljskim izzivom v Evropski uniji, kot so staranje prebivalstva, razvoj kmetijskega trga ali vprašanja glede priseljevanja, energije in podnebnih sprememb;
H. whereas the structural policies have an important role to play in strengthening territorial cohesion and will have to adapt in line with the emergence of new territorial challenges in the EU, such as the ageing population, changes in the agricultural market and the issues of immigration, energy and climate change,
I. ker je „policentrizem” vodilni motiv evropske ozemeljske strategije, ki jo je treba upoštevati v izvajalnem delu nove kohezijske politike;
I. whereas ‘polycentrism’ is the leitmotiv in the European Territorial Strategy that must be taken into account in the implementing phase of the new cohesion policy,
J. ker je potrebno izboljšati preglednost kohezijske politike;
J. whereas there is a need to increase the cohesion policy’s visibility,
3. poudarja, da bi morale Komisija, države članice in regionalne ter lokalne oblasti posebno pozornost nameniti spoštovanju ciljev, ki so bili vključeni v vse politike in ukrepe izvajalnega dela nove kohezijske politike, da bi preprečili izključevanje prebivalstva iz družbe;
Points out that the Commission, the Member States and the regional and local authorities should give special attention to fulfilling the objectives that have been incorporated across the board in all policies and actions in the implementation phase of the new cohesion policy, to prevent social exclusion;
5. meni, da bi morale Komisija in države članice povečati prispevek Evropskega socialnega sklada pri izvajanju evropske strategije zaposlovanja, in sicer z okrepitvijo njunega razmerja, in to povečanje takoj ponazoriti z ustreznimi kazalci za spodbujanje enakih možnosti;
Considers that the Commission and the Member States should improve the contribution from the European Social Fund to implementation of the European Employment Strategy (EES) by strengthening the relationship between them, and that this improvement should subsequently be demonstrated using relevant indicators to promote equal opportunities;
Nadalje Komisijo in Svet poziva, naj se ne osredotočata le na velike projekte in centre odličnosti, vendar tudi na manjše projekte, ki potekajo v manj razvitih regijah, še posebej tiste, ki prispevajo k trajnostnemu regionalnemu razvoju;
Calls on the Commission and Council to look into whether a requirement such as proposed in the above Aho Report to earmark at least 20 % of the structural funds for promoting R+D+i is viable and to focus not only on major projects and centres of excellence, but to also pay attention to smaller projects in less favoured regions, particularly those that contribute to sustainable regional development;
10. pozdravlja oblikovanje projektov teritorialne agende EU in leipziške listine, vendar ob tem poudarja, da mora biti v teh strateških dokumentih bolj natančno opredeljeno, kako določiti ukrepe za izpolnjevanje zastavljenih ciljev in kakšno naj bo pri tem sodelovanje držav članic; v okviru neuradnega sveta v Leipzigu 24. do 25. maja 2007 trdno vztraja pri tem, da se države članice uradno zavežejo k trajnostnemu razvoju mest;
Welcomes the preparation of the drafts for the EU’s Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter, but in this connection underlines the need for both to specify with greater clarity how to define the measures for fulfilling the objectives set out in the two strategy papers and what the Member States’ involvement should be; urges the Member States, in the context of the Leipzig Informal Council on 24-25 May 2007, to make a formal commitment to sustainable urban development;
13. poziva Komisijo, naj prav tako preveri ozemeljski učinek namenske dodelitve sredstev in zlasti oceni, če namenitev evropskih sredstev za uresničitev lizbonskih ciljev dejansko prispeva k uravnoteženemu in skladnemu regionalnemu razvoju;
Calls on the Commission also to verify the territorial impact of earmarking, and in particular to evaluate whether the earmarking of European funding for the Lisbon objectives is actually contributing to balanced and coherent regional development;
16. poziva Komisijo, države članice in regije, naj v večji meri uporabljajo strukturne sklade za spodbujanje trajnostnega in neodvisnega razvoja regij, ki se soočajo z izseljevanjem, in za odpravljanje negativnih posledic demografskih sprememb;
Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the regions to make greater use of the structural funds so that they boost the independent, sustainable development of regions of net emigration and counteract the negative consequences of demographic change;
18. predlaga Komisiji, državam članicam ter regijam in lokalnim oblastem, naj na podeželju podpirajo in spodbujajo gospodarske dejavnosti, povezane z razvojem novih tehnologij, pri katerih ni potrebna geografska bližina velikih mestnih središč;
Suggests that the Commission, the Member States, the regions and the local authorities support and encourage economic activities in rural areas geared to the development of new technologies, especially as they do not require physical proximity to the major urban centres;