natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evropski model kmetijstva odraža večnamensko vlogo, ki jo ima kmetijstvo v bogastvu in raznolikosti krajine, živilskih proizvodih ter kulturni in naravni dediščini.
The European Model of Agriculture reflects the multifunctional role farming plays in the richness and diversity of landscapes, food products and cultural and natural heritage.
Evropski model kmetijstva odraža večnamensko vlogo, ki jo ima kmetijstvo v bogastvu in raznolikosti krajine, živilskih proizvodih ter kulturni in naravni dediščini, in je torej prilagodljivo na nove družbene zahteve, kot so kakovost izdelkov, varnost hrane, zeleni turizem, povečanje pomena naravne dediščine in alternativni viri energije.
The European Model of Agriculture reflects the multifunctional role farming plays in the richness and diversity of landscapes, food products and cultural and natural heritage and is thus adaptable to new social demands, such as for quality products, food safety, green tourism, the enhancement of the natural heritage, and alternative energy sources.
Priloga, točka 2.2
Annex, point 2.2
Reformi iz leta 2003 in 2004 predstavljata glavni ukrep za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti in trajnostnega razvoja kmetijske dejavnosti v EU in določata okvir za prihodnje reforme.
The 2003 and 2004 CAP reforms represent a major step forward to improve the competitiveness and sustainable development of farming activity in the EU and set the framework for future reforms.
Zaporedni reformi sta povečali konkurenčnost evropskega kmetijstva z zmanjšanjem garancij za zaščito cen.
Successive reforms have boosted the competitiveness of European agriculture by reducing price support guarantees.
Uvedba nevezanih neposrednih plačil spodbuja kmete, da se bolj odzivajo na tržne signale, ki jih ustvarja povpraševanje potrošnikov, kakor na spodbude politike , povezane s količino.
The introduction of decoupled direct payments encourages farmers to respond to market signals generated by consumer demand rather than by quantity related policy incentives.
Vključitev standardov okolja, varnosti hrane, zdravja in dobrega počutja živali v navzkrižni skladnosti krepi zaupanje potrošnikov in veča okoljsko trajnost kmetovanja.
The inclusion of environment, food safety, animal health and welfare standards in cross-compliance reinforces consumer confidence and increases the environmental sustainability of farming.
Reformi iz leta 2003 in 2004 predstavljata glavni ukrep za izboljšanje regionalne in lokalne konkurenčnosti ter trajnostnega razvoja kmetijske dejavnosti v EU in določata okvir za prihodnje reforme.
The 2003 and 2004 CAP reforms represent a major step forward to improve the regional and local competitiveness and sustainable development of farming activity in the EU and set the framework for future reforms.
Uvedba nevezanih neposrednih plačil spodbuja kmete, da se bolj odzivajo na tržne signale, ki jih ustvarjajo povpraševanje potrošnikov in potrebe družbe , kakor na politične spodbude, povezane s količino, in na prakso intenzivnega kmetovanja .
The introduction of decoupled direct payments encourages farmers to respond to market signals generated by consumer demand and the needs of society rather than by quantity related policy incentives and the practice of intensive farming .
Priloga, točka 2.3, odstavek 1
Annex, point 2.3, paragraph 1
Politika prihodnjega razvoja podeželja se osredotoča na tri ključna področja: kmetijsko-živilsko gospodarstvo , okolje in širše podeželsko gospodarstvo ter prebivalstvo.
The future Rural Development policy focuses on three key areas: the agrifood economy, the environment and the broader rural economy and population.
Nova generacija strategij razvoja podeželja in programov bo zgrajena ob cilju konkurenčnosti za kmetijstvo, prehrano in gozdarstvo, cilju okolja in upravljanja zemljišč in cilju kakovosti življenja/diverzifikacije v podeželskih območjih.
The new generation of rural development strategies and programmes will be built around a competitiveness axis for agriculture, food and forestry, a land management-environment axis and a quality of life/diversification axis in rural areas.
Politika prihodnjega razvoja podeželja se osredotoča na tri ključna področja: kmetijstvo, predelavo hrane , okolje in širše podeželsko gospodarstvo ter prebivalstvo.
The future Rural Development policy focuses on three key areas: agriculture,food processing , the environment and the broader rural economy and population.
The first axis of rural development should primarily also increase the competitiveness of farming and craft businesses with regional marketing, not that of industrial businesses.
The first axis of rural development should primarily also increase the competitiveness of farming and craft businesses with regional marketing, not that of industrial businesses.
Priloga, točka 2.4, odstavek 1
Annex, point 2.4, paragraph 1
Za podeželska območja je značilna velika raznolikost razmer, od oddaljenih podeželskih območij, kjer število prebivalcev upada, do perifernih urbanih območij, ki so pod vse večjim pritiskom urbanih središč.
Rural areas are characterised by a very large diversity of situations, ranging from remote rural areas suffering from depopulation and decline to peri-urban areas under increasing pressure from urban centres.
Za podeželska območja je značilna velika raznolikost razmer, od oddaljenih podeželskih, gorskih in prikrajšanih območij, kjer število prebivalcev upada, do perifernih urbanih območij, ki so pod vse večjim pritiskom urbanih središč.
Rural areas are characterised by a very large diversity of situations, ranging from remote rural, mountain, and disad van taged areas suffering from depopulation and decline to peri-urban areas under increasing pressure from urban centres.
Zato se zahtevajo različne strategije razvoja podeželja.
Differentiated rural development strategies are thus required.
Priloga, točka 2.4, odstavek 2
Annex, point 2.4, paragraph 2
V skladu z opredelitvijo OECD, ki temelji na gostoti prebivalstva, predstavljajo podeželska območja EU-25 92 % ozemlja.
According to the OECD definition, which is based on population density, rural regions represent in the EU-25 92% of the territory.
19 % prebivalstva živi v pretežno podeželskih regijah in 37 % v znatno podeželskih območjih.
Furthermore, 19% of the population live in predominantly rural regions and 37% live in significantly rural regions.
Te regije ustvarjajo 45 % bruto dodane vrednosti (BDV) v EU-25 in zagotavljajo 53 % zaposlenosti, vendar se nagibajo k zaostajanju glede številnih socialno-ekonomskih kazalnikov, vključno s strukturnimi kazalniki, v primerjavi z nepodeželskimi območji.
These regions generate 45% of Gross Value Added (GVA) in the EU-25 and provide 53% of the employment, but tend to lag as regards a number of socio-economic indicators, including Structural Indicators, compared to non-rural areas.
V podeželskih območjih je prihodek na prebivalca približno za tretjino manjši, stopnje dejavnosti so nižje pri ženskah, storitveni sektor je manj razvit, visokošolske izobrazbene ravni so splošno nižje in odstotek gospodinjstev s „širokopasovnim“ dostopom do interneta je manjši.
In rural areas, income per inhabitant is around a third less, activity rates for women are lower, the service sector is less developed, higher education levels are generally lower, and a lower percentage of households has access to ‘broadband’ internet.
Oddaljenost in perifernost sta glavna problema v nekaterih podeželskih regijah.
Remoteness and peripherality are major problems in some rural regions.
Te pomanjkljivosti so še večje v pretežno podeželskih regijah , čeprav se lahko splošna slika na ravni EU med državami članicami znatno razlikuje.
These disad van tages tend to be even more significant in predominantly rural regions , although the general picture at EU level can vary substantially between Member States.
Pomanjkanje priložnosti, stikov in izobraževalne infrastrukture so posebej problem za ženske in mlade v oddaljenih podeželskih območjih.
Lack of opportunities, contacts and training infrastructure are a particular problem for women and young people in remote rural areas.
Te regije ustvarjajo 45 % bruto dodane vrednosti (BDV) v EU-25 in zagotavljajo 53 % zaposlenosti, vendar se nagibajo k zaostajanju glede številnih socialno-ekonomskih kazalnikov, vključno s strukturnimi kazalniki, v primerjavi z nepodeželskimi območji.
These regions generate 45% of Gross Value Added (GVA) in the EU-25 and provide 53% of the employment, but tend to lag behind as regards a number of socio-economic indicators, including Structural Indicators, compared to non-rural areas.
Te pomanjkljivosti so še večje v pretežno podeželskih regijah in v najbolj obrobnih regijah, kjer so kmetije majhne, osamljene in izpostavljene težkim podnebnim razmeram, njihov izbor pridelkov pa skromen.
These disad van tages tend to be even more significant in predominantly rural regions and in the outermost regions, where farms are small, isolated, exposed to severe climate conditions and limited in their range of produce.
Pomanjkanje priložnosti, stikov in izobraževalne infrastrukture so poseben problem za ženske in mlade v oddaljenih podeželskih območjih.
Lack of opportunities, contacts and training infrastructure are a particular problem for women and young people in remote rural areas.
Priloga, točka 2.4, odstavek 2, opomba 6
Annex, point 2.4, paragraph 2, footnote 6
Opredelitev OECD temelji na deležu prebivalstva, ki živi v podeželskih skupnostih (t.j. z manj kot 150 prebivalcev na km2) v dani regiji NUTS III.
The OECD definition is based on the share of population living in rural communes (i.e. with less than 150 inhabitants per km²) in a given NUTS III region.
Glej razširjeno presojo vplivov SEK(2004) 931.
See Extended Impact Assessment - SEC( 2004) 931.
To je edina mednarodno priznana opredelitev podeželskih območij.
This is the only definition of rural areas internationally recognised.
Vendar v nekaterih primerih ne upošteva v polni meri prebivalstva, ki živi v gosteje naseljenih podeželskih območjih, zlasti v perifernih urbanih območjih.
However, in some cases, it does not fully take into account the population living in more densely populated rural areas, particularly in peri -urban zones.
Glej razširjeno presojo vplivov SEK(2004) 931.
See Extended Impact Assessment - SEC(2004) 931.
Vendar v nekaterih primerih ne upošteva v polni meri prebivalstva, ki živi v gosteje naseljenih podeželskih območjih, zlasti v perifernih urbanih območjih.
However, in some cases, it does not fully take into account the population living in more densely populated rural areas, particularly in peri-urban zones.
V okviru teh smernic se definicija OECD uporablja le za statistične in opisne namene.
In the context of these guidelines, the OECD definition is only used for statistical and descriptive purposes.
Considering the shortcomings of the OECD definition as described already in this footnote, it should be stated as well that it should be used only for statistical and descriptive purposes in the context of these guidelines .
Considering the shortcomings of the OECD definition as described already in this footnote, it should be stated as well that it should be used only for statistical and descriptive purposes in the context of these guidelines .
Priloga, točka 2.4, odstavek 3
Annex, point 2.4, paragraph 3
V EU-15 znaša kmetijstvo 2 % BDP, v novih državah članicah 3 % in več kot 10 % v Romuniji in Bolgariji.
In EU-15 agriculture accounts for 2% of GDP, in the new Member States for 3% and more than 10% in Romania and Bulgaria.
V novih državah članicah dela v kmetijstvu trikrat več ljudi (12 %) kakor v starih državah članicah (4 %).
In the new Member states three times as many people work in agriculture (12%) compared to the old member states (4%).
V Bolgariji in Romuniji je stopnja zaposlenosti v kmetijstvu precej višja.
In Bulgaria and Romania agricultural employment levels are considerably higher.
Za kmetijski sektor v novih državah članicah je značilno znatno manjše financiranje in ogromne razlike v ravneh prihodkov v primerjavi z drugimi državami članicami EU.
The new Member States are characterised by the significant under funding of the agricultural sector and huge disparities in income levels in comparison with the other EU Member States.
Zato se mora načelo kohezije uporabljati tudi na podeželju.
The cohesion principle must therefore also be implemented in rural area.
Increased funding under the second pillar of the CAP may partly offset the adverse impact on farmers in the new Member States of the schedule for the full introduction of direct payments.
Increased funding under the second pillar of the CAP may partly offset the adverse impact on farmers in the new Member States of the schedule for the full introduction of direct payments.
The new approach to the development of rural areas, involving an increase in non-agricultural activities, provides an opportunity to improve income levels in rural communities, including among farmers.
The new approach to the development of rural areas, involving an increase in non-agricultural activities, provides an opportunity to improve income levels in rural communities, including among farmers.
Eurostat figures show that traditional farming areas are currently the poorest regions of the Community.
Eurostat figures show that traditional farming areas are currently the poorest regions of the Community.
Priloga, točka 2.4, odstavek 7a (novo)
Annex, point 2.4, paragraph 7a (new)
Prav tako je treba poudariti tudi pomen obrti na podeželju.
The importance of crafts in the countryside must also be stressed.
Povezana je z vsemi panogami: gradbeništvom, prehrano, transportom, tekstilom itd.
Crafts are linked to all sectors of activity: buildings, food, transport, textiles, etc.
Obrt omogoča ustvarjanje delovnih mest, usposabljanje mladih z vajeništvom, prenos tradicionalnih spretnosti in oblikovanje socialnih vezi v najbolj oddaljenih območjih.
They enable job creation, training of young people through apprenticeships, the transmission of traditional skills and the creation of social ties in the most remote areas.
Priloga, točka 2.4, odstavek 8
Annex, point 2.4, paragraph 8
Ob ponovnem lansiranju lizbonske strategije je Evropski svet ponovno potrdil, da je potrebno na lizbonsko strategijo gledati v širšem kontekstu trajnostnega razvoja, da je potrebno sedanje potrebe zadovoljiti, ne da bi ogrozili možnosti prihodnjih generacij, da bi izpolnile svoje lastne potrebe.
On the occasion of the relaunch of the Lisbon Strategy, the European Council has reaffirmed that the Lisbon Strategy is to be seen in the wider context of sustainable development, that present needs must be met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Novo programsko obdobje zagotavlja edinstveno priložnost za ponovno osredotočenje podpore iz novega sklada za razvoj podeželja na rast, delovna mesta in trajnost.
The new programming period provides a unique opportunity to refocus support from the new rural development fund on growth, jobs and sustainability.
V tem smislu je povsem v skladu z Deklaracijo o vodilnih načelih trajnostnega razvoja in prenovljenega lizbonskega akcijskega programa, ki skuša določiti ciljne vire, s katerimi bi naredili Evropo privlačnejšo za naložbe in delo, pospeševali znanje in inovacije za rast in ustvarili več in boljša delovna mesta.
In this respect, it is fully in line with the Declaration on the Guiding Principles for Sustainable Development and the renewed Lisbon Action Programme which seeks to target resources at making Europe a more attractive place to invest and work, promoting knowledge and innovation for growth and creating more and better jobs.
Podeželska območja so prikrajšana, ker nimajo dostopa do enake ravni in kakovosti storitev, kot je na razpolago urbanim območjem.
Rural areas are disadvantaged as they do not have access to the same level and quality of services as are available in urban areas.
Zaradi pomanjkljivosti pri zagotavljanju storitev, na primer glede cest, javnega prevoza, informacijske tehnologije itd. imajo ljudje težave pri uresničevanju želje za življenje in delo na podeželju.
This deficit in the provision of services, such as road, public transport, information technology etc. makes it difficult for people wishing to live and work in rural areas to do so.
Priloga, točka 2.4, odstavek 9
Annex, point 2.4, paragraph 9
Politika razvoja podeželja mora podeželskim območjem pomagati, da izpolnijo te cilje v obdobju 2007–2013.
Rural development policy must help rural areas meet these objectives in the period 2007–2013.
To zahteva bolj strateški pristop h konkurenčnosti, ustvarjanju delovnih mest in inovativnosti v podeželskih območjih in boljše upravljanje izvedbe programov.
This requires a more strategic approach to competitiveness, job creation and innovation in rural areas and improved governance in the delivery of programmes.
Potrebna je večja osredotočenost na v prihodnost usmerjene naložbe v ljudi, znanje in izkušnje ter kapital v kmetijskem in gozdarskem sektorju, na nove načine izvajanja okoljskih storitev, koristnih za vse, in ustvarjanje več in boljših delovnih mest z diverzifikacijo, zlasti za ženske in mlade.
There must be an increased focus on forward-looking investments in people, know-how and capital in the farm and forestry sectors, on new ways of delivering win-win environmental services and on creating more and better jobs through diversification, particularly for women and young people.
S tem ko politika razvoja podeželja pomaga podeželskim območjem EU, da izpolnjujejo svoj potencial kot privlačen kraj za naložbe, delo in življenje, lahko prispeva k trajnostnemu razvoju evropskega ozemlja.
By helping the EU’s rural areas to fulfil their potential as attractive places to invest, work and live, rural development policy can play its part in the sustainable development of Europe’s territory.
Politika razvoja podeželja mora ljudem na podeželskih območjih pomagati, da uporabijo svoje sposobnosti v partnerstvih med vladnimi agencijami in civilno družbo v prizadevanjih za dosego teh ciljev v obdobju 2007–2013.
Rural development policy must help people in rural areas to make use of their abilities in partnerships between government agencies and civil society in pursuit of these objectives in the period 2007–2013.
To zahteva bolj strateški pristop EU in držav članic za dosego treh ciljev: kohezije, konkurenčnosti in trajnosti.
This requires a more strategic approach by the EU and the Member States in order to attain the three objectives of cohesion, competitiveness and sustainability.
To bo privedlo do ustvarjanja delovnih mest, inovativnosti in boljšega upravljanja izvedbe programov v podeželskih območjih .
This will lead to the creation of jobs and innovation and improved governance in the delivery of programmes in rural areas .
Podpora za podeželska območja mora vsebovati zlasti zagotovitev nujnih finančnih sredstev za nove države članice, da bi zmanjšali razlike med njimi in EU-15.
Support for rural areas should involve, in particular, the provision of essential funding to the new Member States in order to reduce the gap between them and the EU15.
Cohesion as an objective and the creation of local partnerships as a means are important factors in rural development and must therefore be mentioned in the text .
Cohesion as an objective and the creation of local partnerships as a means are important factors in rural development and must therefore be mentioned in the text.
Priloga, točka 3
Annex, point 3
V okviru osnovnih ciljev, vzpostavljenih z uredbo o razvoju podeželja, te smernice določajo prednostne naloge Skupnosti, namenjene vključevanju glavnih prednostnih nalog politike, opredeljenih v sklepih Evropskih svetov v Lizboni in Göteborgu.
Within the framework of the objectives established in the Rural Development regulation, these guidelines identify priorities for the Community, aimed at the integration of major policy priorities as spelled out in the conclusions of the Lisbon and Göteborg European Councils.
Za vsak sklop prednostnih nalog so predstavljeni ključni ukrepi.
For each set of priorities, key actions are presented.
Države članice pripravijo svoje nacionalne strategije razvoja podeželja, ki predstavljajo referenčni okvir za pripravo programov razvoja podeželja na podlagi teh strateških smernic.
Member States shall prepare their national rural development strategies, constituting the reference framework for the preparation of rural development programmes, on the basis of these strategic guidelines.
V okviru ciljev, vzpostavljenih z uredbo o razvoju podeželja spodaj navedene strateške smernice v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 določajo prednostne naloge Skupnosti.
Within the framework of the objectives established in the Rural Development regulation, the strategic guidelines set out below identify priorities for the Community pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
Smernice so namenjene vključevanju glavnih prednostnih nalog politike, opredeljenih v sklepih Evropskih svetov v Lizboni , Göteborgu in Luksembourgu .
The guidelines are aimed at the integration of major policy priorities as spelled out in the conclusions of the Lisbon , Göteborg and Luxembourg European Councils.
Za vsak sklop prednostnih nalog so zaradi ponazoritve predstavljeni ključni ukrepi.
For each set of priorities, key actions are presented for illustrative purposes .
Pri oblikovanju programov za razvoj podeželja morajo biti države članice posebno prilagodljive, da prednostne naloge Skupnosti prilagodijo posebnim pogojem, ki prevladujejo na njihovem ozemlju.
When drawing up rural development programmes, Member States shall have the necessary flexibility to adapt Community priorities in order to tailor them to the particular conditions prevailing on their territory.
Kadar je ustrezno utemeljeno, bi jim morale biti omogočene ponovne prilagoditve.
They shall also be able to make readjustments, where sufficiently justified.
Priloga, točka 3.1, smernica, odstavek 2
Annex, point 3.1, Guideline, paragraph 2
Viri, namenjeni cilju 1, morajo prispevati k močnemu in dinamičnemu evropskemu kmetijsko-živilskemu sektorju z osredotočenjem na prednostne naloge prenosa znanja in inovacij v prehransko verigo in prednostne sektorje za naložbe v fizični in človeški kapital.
The resources devoted to axis 1 should contribute to a strong and dynamic European agrifood sector by focusing on the priorities of knowledge transfer and innovation in the food chain and priority sectors for investment in physical and human capital.
Viri, namenjeni cilju 1, morajo prispevati k močnemu in dinamičnemu evropskemu kmetijskemu, gozdarskemu in živilskemu sektorju z osredotočenjem na prednostne naloge prenosa znanja , posodobitev in inovacij v kmetijsko in prehransko verigo ter prednostne sektorje za naložbe v fizični in človeški kapital , vključno s spodbujanjem uporabe informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij in odzivanjem na posebne potrebe mladih kmetov
The resources devoted to axis 1 should contribute to a strong and dynamic European agriculture, forestry and food sector by focusing on the priorities of knowledge transfer, modernisation and innovation in the farming and food chain and priority sectors for investment in physical and human capital, including promoting the use of ICT technologies and responding to the specific needs of young farmers.
All three aspects of the sector should be covered by the measures.
All three aspects of the sector should be covered by the measures.
Modernisation measures assist farmers to improve the performance of their holdings and become more competitive in the marketplace.
Modernisation measures assist farmers to improve the performance of their holdings and become more competitive in the marketplace.
Within this objective, ICT technologies are relevant.
Within this objective, ICT technologies are rele van t.
Young farmers should be prioritized due to their role in overcoming the problem of ageing of the farm population and in maintaining the sustainability of the farming activity.
Young farmers should be prioritized due to their role in overcoming the problem of ageing of the farm population and in maintaining the sustainability of the farming activity .