natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar poročevalec meni, da je treba ta predlog oceniti v širši luči zadnjih dogajanj v zvezi z Europolom.
However, your rapporteur believes that this proposal needs to be assessed in the more general context of the latest developments concerning Europol.
Ta organ je trenutno, kot je zgoraj omenjeno, v stanju reforme, in to upravičeno.
This body, as mentioned above, is currently in the status of being reformed, and for good reasons.
Evropski parlament je večkrat vztrajal na potrebi po demokratičnem nadzoru, varstvu podatkov, preglednosti (dostop do dokumentov) in odgovornosti Europola.
The European Parliament has insisted several times on the requisite of democratic control, data protection, transparency (access to documents) and accountability of Europol.
Do sedaj Svet teh elementov še ni obravnaval.
So far these elements have not yet been addressed by the Council.
Poročevalec bo odločno podprl splošno reformo Europola, če bo le-ta obravnavala zgoraj omenjene elemente.
The general reform of Europol will be very much supported by your rapporteur as far as it is going to address the above mentioned elements.
Vendar pa se zaenkrat zdi, da priprava mnenja s strani Parlamenta o tej pobudi ni nekaj, kar bi bilo usklajeno z našimi zahtevami.
However, for the time being, it does not seem consistent with our requests to draft an opinion on the initiative on which the Parliament is being consulted here.
Da bi Europol bolje opravljal svojo vlogo urada EU za policijsko sodelovanje, je potrebna večja preglednost.
More transparency is needed in order to enhance Europol in its role as the EU's police cooperation office.
Vsak naslednji predlog o prihodnosti Europola mora obravnavati spodaj razložene točke in samo v tem primeru lahko Evropski parlament poda svoje mnenje.
Any future proposals on the future of Europol need to address the points developed below and only on that occasion can the European Parliament provide its opinion.
Nekateri elementi so za Parlament bistvenega pomena in se lahko uporabijo kot primerna osnova za premislek:
Some elements are crucial for the Parliament and they can be used as good material for reflection:
Protokoli, ki spreminjajo Konvencijo o Europolu:
The Europol convention's amending protocols:
Pomembno je opozoriti, da je bila izvirna Konvencija o Europolu, ki je bila podpisana 26. julija 1995, spremenjena s tremi protokoli
It is important to note that the original Europol convention signed on the 26 July 1995 has been amended by three protocols
Po Konvenciji o Europolu (člen 43 Konvencije o Europolu) morajo države članice ratificirati spremembe v skladu s svojimi ustavnimi zahtevami. , ki pa jih do sedaj niso ratificirale vse države članice, tako da ne morejo začeti veljati.
According to the Europol Convention (Art. 43 of the Europol Convention) have to be ratified by Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements. , which until now have not been ratified by all Member States and consequently could not enter into force.
Ti protokoli so namenjeni krepitvi vloge Europola kot osrednje evropske organizacije kazenskega pregona.
These protocols intend to enhance Europol’s role as the central European law enforcement organisation.
Obravnavali so ovire, na katere so države članice naletele v svojem vsakodnevnem sodelovanju z Europolom in sodelovanju Europola s tretjimi partnerji
They addressed obstacles identified by Member States in their daily cooperation with Europol and the cooperation between Europol and Third partners
Drugi protokol (Sklep Sveta z dne 28. novembra 2002) na primer Europolu dodeljuje pristojnosti za sodelovanje v skupnih preiskovalnih enotah držav članic ter poudarja in krepi njegovo vlogo osrednjega usklajevalnega organa za preiskave držav članic.
The second protocol (Council Decision of 28 November 2002), for example, assigns Europol competences to participate in Joint Investigative Teams of the Member States and underlines and reinforces its role as a central coordination body for Member States’ investigations.
Tretji protokol ("Danski protokol", Sklep Sveta z dne 27. novembra 2003) med drugim poenostavlja notranje postopke, ki so upočasnjevali in še upočasnjujejo delo Europola, Europolu daje možnost vzpostavitve novih zbirk podatkov zavoljo lažjega opravljanja analiz, olajšuje sodelovanje tretjih partnerjev v analitičnem delu Europola in širi pravice Evropskega parlamenta. .
The third protocol (“Danish protocol”, Council Decision of 27 November 2003) streamlines, among others, internal procedures which delayed Europol’s work in the past and at present, gives Europol the possibility to set up new data bases in order to facilitate its analysis work, facilitates the participation of Third partners in Europol’s analytical work and extends the rights of the European Parliament. .
Zato preseneča, da države članice, ki so med pogajanji in med sprejemanjem protokola v Svetu pokazale svojo politično odločenost, sedaj ne želijo nadaljevati z postopkom notranje ratifikacije.
It is therefore surprising that Member States - which have shown their political determination for a change during negotiations and during the adoption of the protocol by the Council - are now unwilling to proceed with the internal ratification process.
Tudi pri sprejemanju ustavne pogodbe EU so države članice jasno pokazale, da želijo v prihodnosti razširiti vlogo Europola, zdaj pa se zdi, da se obotavljajo pri sprejemanju ukrepov, potrebnih za izvajanje sprememb, ki so jih že sprejele.
Furthermore, when adopting the EU Constitutional Treaty, the Member States set a clear signal towards an extended role for Europol in the future, but at present they seem reluctant to take the necessary action to implement the changes they have already decided upon.
Čeprav je Evropski svet države članice pozval k ratifikaciji vseh protokolov do konca leta 2004, ni bilo do sedaj doseženega nobenega napredka
Despite the European Council's request to Member States as regards the ratification of all protocols by end of 2004, no progress has been made until now
Boj proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu; policijsko sodelovanje v Evropi: vloga Europola, prispevek Jensa Henrika Højbjerga, namestnika direktorja Europola, na skupni parlamentarni seji dne 18. oktobra 2005, str.
Fight against terrorism and organised crime; police cooperation in Europe: the role of Europol, contribution of Mr. Jens Henrik Højbjerg, Europol Deputy Director to the joint parliamentary meeting of 18 October 2005, p.2 .
Zdaj bi bil verjetno pravi čas, da se evropsko konvencijo nadomesti s sklepom Sveta
It would be probably the right time now to replace the European Convention by a Council decision
Predsednikov povzetek konference na visoki ravni o prihodnosti Europola (23. in 24. februar 2006), Europol 20 CATS 63, v Bruslju, 29. marca 2006, 7868/06, str.
Chairman's Summary of the High level Conference on the Future of Europol (23-24 February 2006), Europol 20 CATS 63, Brussels 29 March 2006, 7868/06, p.
Dostop do dokumentov Europola
Access to Europol's documents
Organizacija Europola sega nazaj v 90. leta 20. stoletja in se lahko šteje za prvi rezultat sodelovanja v EU na področju kazenskega pregona.
The architecture of Europol dates back to the early 1990s and it can be considered as the oldest product of EU law enforcement cooperation.
Že nekaj let se pojavljajo težave predvsem glede dostopa do Europolovih dokumentov, namreč glede načela razpoložljivosti.
For some years now problems have been encountered above all regarding access to its documents, namely the principle of availability.
Med Europolove naloge že spada medsebojna izmenjava informacij
Mutual exchange of information is already under the task of the Europol
Konvencija o Europolu, akt Sveta z dne 26. julija 1995, Naslov II. .
Europol Convention, Council Act 26 July 1995, Title II. .
Vendar pa je obveznost posredovanja podatkov iz držav članic Europolu, omenjena v Konvenciji o Europolu, na žalost zgolj moralna.
However, it is unfortunate that in the Europol Convention, the duty to supply data from the Member States to Europol is only a moral one.
Če bi bila pravno zavezujoča, bi bila bolj učinkovita
It would be more effective if it was legally binding
Ta zahteva bi bila izpolnjena, če bi Europol postal evropska agencija, saj bi v tem primeru lahko uporabili evropske skupne standarde.
This requirement could be met if Europol becomes a European Agency since in that case European common standards could be implemented.
Da bi Europol odgovorno opravljal svoje dejavnosti, bi slednje moral nadzorovati Evropski parlament.
In order to be accountable, Europol activity should be scrutinised by the European Parliament.
Parlament je že velikokrat zahteval letna poročila o dejavnostih Europola in poročila o varstvu podatkov, ki bi jih pripravil skupni nadzorni organ, pristojen za varstvo podatkov, vendar te zahteve do sedaj še niso bile uresničene
The Parliament has often requested for the Europol annual activities report and for the data protection report to be drafted by the joint supervisory body responsible for data protection, but these demands have not been met till now
Moraesovo poročilo o pobudi Velikega vojvodstva Luksemburg glede sprejetja sklepa Sveta o prilagajanju osnovnih plač in nadomestil za zaposlene pri Europolu (5429/2005- C6-0037/2005 - 2005/0803(CNS) , A6-0139/2005 , str.
Moraes Report on the initiative by the grand duchy of Luxembourg with a view to adopting a Council decision adjusting the basic salaries and allowance applicable to Europol Staff (5429/2005-C C6-0037/2005 -2005/0803 (CNS), A6‑0139/2005 , p.6 .
7. , obveščanje Evropskega parlamenta v skladu s postopkom posvetovanja in možnost, da predsedstvo ali njihov predstavnik in direktor Europola pred Evropskim parlamentom razpravljajo o splošnih vprašanjih v zvezi z Europolom
7. , informing the European Parliament according to the consultation procedure and the possibility for the Presidency or its representative and the Director of Europol to appear before the European Parliament in order to discuss general questions related to Europol
Čeprav je v protokolu, ki sicer še ni ratificiran, najti nekatere elemente preglednosti, je jasno, da trenutno stanje, ko je Evropskemu parlamentu onemogočeno enakopravno sodelovanje s Svetom pri postopku imenovanja in razreševanja direktorja Europola, jasno kaže na nezadostno raven parlamentarnega nadzora nad Europolom.
Despite some elements of transparency inserted in the Protocol, although not yet ratified, it is clear that the current impossibility for the European Parliament to be involved on an equal basis with the Council in the nomination and dismissal process of the Europol Director clearly shows insufficient Parliamentary control on Europol.
Europolova obveza k pošiljanju nekaterih informacij Evropskemu parlamentu, med drugim splošnega poročila o Europolovih dejavnostih v prejšnjem letu, poročila o Europolovih dejavnostih v prihodnjem letu in petletnega finančnega načrta, še ni bila izpolnjena
Europol's engagement to send information to the European Parliament the general report on Europol activities in the previous year, the Europol's future activities report and the five-years financing plan has not yet been met
To stanje se ne zdi zadovoljivo.
This situation does not seem satisfactory.
Lahko bi zagovarjali stališče, da je Europol evropska obveščevalna agencija
One could claim that Europol is a European intelligence service
Program dela 2007, Europol, v Haagu, 31. marca 2006, str.
Work Programme 2007, Europol, The Hague 31 March 2006, p.
3. in bi zato morala dajati prednost varnosti pred preglednostjo.
3. and therefore should give priority to security rather than transparency.
Iz opisa njegovih nalog pa je jasno, da je ta organ v bistvu informacijski in analitični sistem brez izvršnih pooblastil.
However, by looking at its mission statement it is clear that this body provides essentially an information and analysis system without having executive powers.
V t.i. območju svobode, varnosti in pravice takšna neuravnoteženost med varnostnimi cilji in preglednostjo ni več sprejemljiva.
In the so-called Area of freedom, security and justice, such an imbalance between security goals and transparency is no longer acceptable.
Europol lahko zelo učinkovito podpira organe kazenskega pregona iz držav članic pri preprečevanju in boju proti hudim oblikam mednarodnega organiziranega kriminala.
Europol can be a very useful support to the Member States law enforcement authorities in preventing and combating serious forms of international organised crime.
Vendar pa zaradi zgoraj navedenih razlogov Evropski parlament kritizira pomanjkanje zadostnega demokratičnega nadzora, preglednosti in odgovornosti tega organa, tako na nacionalni kot evropski ravni.
However, for the reasons stated above, the European Parliament criticises the lack of sufficient democratic control, transparency and accountability of this body at both national and European levels.
Poročevalec odločno zagovarja reformo organizacije in sistema dela Europola na način, ki bo Evropskemu parlamentu omogočil potrebne instrumente za nadzor Europolovih dejavnosti in tako zagotovil demokratični nadzor, ki ga predstavlja naša institucija.
Your rapporteur strongly argues for the reform of the organisation and working system of Europol in such a way that will provide the European Parliament with the necessary instruments to supervise Europol activities to guarantee the democratic control that our institution is there to secure.
Pobuda Republike Avstrije z namenom sprejetja akta Sveta o spremembi kadrovskih predpisov Europola
Initiative by the Republic of Austria with a view to the adoption of a Council Act amending Europol's Staff Regulaions
Oddelek I — Evropski parlament
Section I – European Parliament
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.............................................................3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION 3
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.....................................................5
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION 5
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2004, Oddelek I – Evropski parlament
on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004, Section I – European Parliament
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2004,
– having regard to the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna skupaj z odgovori institucij,
– having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the Implementation of the Budget, together with the institutions’ replies
– ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov, ki jo predloži Računsko sodišče v skladu s členom 248 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty
– ob upoštevanju člena 272(10) in člena 275 Pogodbe ES ter člena 179a Pogodbe Euratom,
– having regard to Articles 272(10) and 275 of the EC Treaty and Article 179a of the Euratom Treaty,
1. zlasti členov 37 in 146 te uredbe,
1. , and in particular Articles 145, 146 and 147 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju člena 13 notranjih pravil Evropskega parlamenta o izvrševanju proračuna,
– having regard to Article 13 of the Internal Rules for the implementation of the European Parliament’s budget
BUR/ANN/FIN – PE 349.540.
Bur/ann/fin - PE 349.540. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 147(1) finančne uredbe, v skladu s katerim se od vsake institucije Skupnosti zahteva, da ustrezno ukrepa na temelju pripomb, ki so priložene resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta o razrešnici,
– having regard to Article 147(1) of the Financial Regulation, pursuant to which each Community institution is required to take all appropriate steps to act on the observations accompanying the European Parliament’s discharge decision,
– ob upoštevanju členov 71 in 74(3) ter priloge V svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 71 and 74(3) of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju drugega pododstavka člena 5(1)(a) priloge V svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Article 5(1)(a), second subparagraph, of Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju izida glasovanja na plenarnem zasedanju 27. aprila 2006 o omenjenem poročilu Odbora za proračunski nadzor, na katerem je bila na željo poročevalca z veliko večino glasov (3 za, 591 proti in 13 vzdržanih) razrešnica zavrnjena in v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 5(1)(a) priloge V poslovnika odložena,
– having regard to the result of the vote in plenary on 27 April 2006 on the above report of the Committee on Budgetary Control, rejecting discharge by an overwhelming majority (three votes for, 591 against and 13 abstentions), at the rapporteur’s request, as a result of which, under Article 5(1)(a), second subparagraph, of Annex V of the Rules of Procedure, discharge is deemed to be postponed
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0158 .
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0158 . ,
- ob upoštevanju drugega poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0280/2006 ),
– having regard to the second report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6‑0280/2006 ),
A. ker je Računsko sodišče opozorilo na pomanjkljivosti nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov (odstavek 9.16 letnega poročila), ki so zlasti formalne; ker po mnenju tega sodišča te napake niso bistveno vplivale na zakonitost in pravilnost poslovnih dogodkov, povezanih z upravnimi odhodki (odstavek 9.27 letnega poročila),
A. whereas the Court of Auditors pointed to weaknesses in supervisory and control systems (paragraph 9.16 of the Court's Annual Report), albeit mostly of a formal nature; whereas, according to the Court, the errors did not materially affect the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying administrative expenditure (paragraph 9.27 of the Court's Annual Report),
B. ker se finančna uredba in poslovnik Parlamenta, kakor je bil spremenjen 23. oktobra 2002,
B. whereas the Financial Regulation and the Rules of Procedure of Parliament as amended on 23 October 2002
303. od 1. januarja 2003 uporabljata v zvezi s postopkovnimi pravili, ki urejajo postopek razrešnice,
303. apply with effect from 1 January 2003 as regards procedural rules governing the discharge,
C. ker je bil poslovnik Evropskega parlamenta 23. oktobra 2002 spremenjen tako, da predvideva podelitev razrešnice predsedniku, in ne generalnemu sekretarju,
C. whereas Parliament’s Rules of Procedure were amended on 23 October 2002 to provide that discharge is to be given to the President rather than to the Secretary-General,
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0158 .
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0158 . ,
– ob upoštevanju drugega poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0280/2006 ),
– having regard to the second report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6‑0280/2006 ),
28. in oceniti napredek pri izvajanju priporočil v njej,
28. on the discharge for 2003 should be followed up and progress in implementing its recommendations assessed,
Računovodski izkazi Evropskega parlamenta
The European Parliament’s accounts
Uporaba odobrenih sredstev
Use of appropriations
Odobrena sredstva za proračunsko leto 2004
Appropriations for the 2004 financial year
Odobrena sredstva, prenesena iz proračunskega leta 2003
Appropriations carried over from the 2003 financial year
Odobrena sredstva 2004
Appropriations 2004
Odobrena sredstva iz namenskih prejemkov
Appropriations from assigned revenue
Člena 9(1) in 9(4) finančne uredbe
Article 9(1) & 9(4) of Financial Regulation
Razpoložljiva sredstva
Appropriations available
Prevzete obveznosti
Commitments entered into
Izvršena plačila
Payments made
Odobrena sredstva, prenesena v proračunsko leto 2005
Appropriations carried over to 2005
Člen 9 finančne uredbe
Article 9 of Financial Regulation
Člen 10 finančne uredbe
Article 10 of Financial Regulation
Zapadla sredstva
Cancelled appropriations
3. ugotavlja, da so bile leta 2004 prevzete obveznosti za 97,76 % sredstev v proračunu Parlamenta (s stopnjo zapadlosti 2,24 %) in da je bila tako kot v prejšnjih letih dosežena zelo visoka raven izvrševanja proračuna;
Notes that, in 2004, 97.76% of the appropriations entered in Parliament’s budget were committed, with a cancellation rate of 2.24%, and that, as in previous years, a very high level of budget implementation was achieved;
Nepremičninska politika Parlamenta s posebnim poudarkom na stavbah Winston Churchill (WIC) in Salvador de Madariaga (SDM)
Parliament’s property policy, focusing on the Winston Churchill (WIC) and Salvador de Madariaga (SDM) Buildings
7. meni, da se z odplačili za stavbe prihrani veliko davkoplačevalskega denarja, zato jih je treba vključiti v proračunsko strategijo;
Considers that repayments on buildings constitute a major saving for the taxpayer and therefore should be set as part of the budgetary strategy;
9. zahteva, da je razpisni postopek za dozidavo zgradbe KAD v Luksemburgu pregleden in pravičen, ker je to prvi razpisni postopek za gradbena dela, ki ga bo vodil Parlament sam;
Calls for the tendering procedures for the building of the extension to the KAD building in Luxembourg to be transparent and fair, these being the first construction tendering procedures to be managed by the Parliament itself;
12. močno obžaluje, da je bil odbor kljub pristojnosti za proračunski nadzor o obtožbah, ki zadevajo omenjeno ureditev, seznanjen iz medijskih poročil, namesto da bi ga – kot bi bilo pričakovati – o tem obvestila uprava ali predsedstvo Evropskega parlamenta, ki sta bili s tem zapletom v celoti seznanjena že več tednov;
Strongly regrets that, despite its competence on Budgetary Control, the Committee only became aware of the allegations relating to the said arrangements from media reports rather than, as should have been expected, from the administration or from the Bureau of the European Parliament, both of which had been fully aware of the allegations for several weeks;
14. ugotavlja, da je omenjena delovna skupina, da bi zagotovila čim večjo preglednost, takoj zahtevala in dobila popoln javni dostop do vse ustrezne dokumentacije o teh stavbah, s katero razpolaga uprava Parlamenta;
Notes that in order to ensure full transparency, the said Working Group immediately called for and obtained full public access to all relevant documentation held by the Parliament’s administration on these buildings;
18. vseeno opozarja, da je Računsko sodišče nedavno izvedlo revizijo politike o zgradbah; poudarja, da je v svojem mnenju izrazilo skrb glede stopnje indeksacije za izračun skupne vrednosti dveletnih najemnin; nadalje ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče jasno poudarilo, da je lahko indeksacija neugodna za Evropski parlament;
Recalls however that ECA has recently conducted an audit on the buildings policy; points out that in its opinion ECA has expressed the concerns as to the use of indexation rates used to calculate the total amount of the bi-annual rent; concludes further that the ECA made it clear the indexation could potentially be unfavourable to the European Parliament;
– najemna pogodba, na podlagi katere Parlament najema omenjeni dve stavbi, predvideva tristransko razmerje med Parlamentom kot najemnikom stavb WIC in SDM, mestom Strasbourg kot najemodajalcem ter SCI Erasme kot zasebnim vlagateljem in lastnikom stavb;
– The lease agreement by virtue of which the European Parliament leases the said two buildings involves a triangular relationship between, on the one part, the Parliament itself as the lessee of the WIC and SDM buildings, on the second part, the City of Strasbourg as the lessor and on the third part, SCI Erasme as the private investor and owner of the buildings;