natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Revizija finančne uredbe je tudi priložnost za razmislek o razvoju evropskega konteksta na področju notranjega nadzora, glede na izide „načrta za okvira notranje kontrole skupnosti“.
The review of the Financial Regulation is also an opportunity to reflect on the development of the European context in the area of internal controls, following the results of the 'road-map for a Community internal control framework'.
Tukaj in v kontekstu skupnega upravljanja bi se bilo koristno lotiti nadaljnjega pojasnjevanja in utrjevanja sistema izjav držav članic, ki je vključen v predloge uredb za novo programsko obdobje (2007–2013).
Here and in the context of joint management, further clarification and consolidation could usefully be undertaken for the system of statements by the Member States included in the proposals for regulations for the new programming period (2007-2013).
Nacionalni revizijski organi držav članic so neodvisna zunanja revizijska telesa, ki uživajo popolno samostojnost v razmerju do institucij EU, kot jim to zagotavljajo njihovi statuti, nacionalno pravo, Pogodbe in druge določbe o izvrševanju proračuna Skupnosti.
The Member States' national audit institutions are independent external audit bodies which enjoy full autonomy vis-à-vis the EU institutions, as guaranteed by their statutes, national law, the Treaties and the other provisions on the implementation of the Community budget.
Poleg tega njihovo delo ne vključuje nujno sistematičnih ukrepov, povezanih s sredstvi Skupnosti, medtem ko se njihova poročila predložijo parlamentom držav članic.
In addition, the discharge of their mandates does not necessarily include systematic actions related to the Community's finances, while their reports are submitted to the Member State parliaments.
Tesnejše sodelovanje z najvišjimi nadzornimi organi v državah članicah je vse bolj prednostnega pomena za Sodišče, glede na to, da je decentralizacija upravljanja proračuna Unije v korist nacionalnih oblasti držav članic in držav upravičenk pospešeno preusmerila težišče nadzora Sodišča na nacionalno raven.
Closer cooperation with the Member States' higher control institutions is increasingly a priority for the Court, given that the decentralisation of the management of the Union budget to the benefit of the national authorities of the Member States and beneficiary states has progressively shifted the centre of gravity of the Court's monitoring over to the national plane.
Ob upoštevanju teh omejitev in želje po večji vključenosti nacionalnih revizijskih organov na osnovi pristopa skupne revizije in usklajenih akcij za sredstva s skupnim upravljanjem bi lahko ti organi prispevali h kakovosti finančnega poslovanja in primerni uporabi sredstev EU tudi z ugotavljanjem, v kakšni meri sistemi upravljanja in nadzora sredstev Unije v državah prejemnicah delujejo pravilno in zagotavljajo ustrezno uporabo zadevnega denarja.
In view of these limits and of the desirability, for shared-management funds, of greater involvement of the national audit institutions on the basis of a shared auditing approach and coordinated actions, one of the ways in which those institutions could contribute to the quality of financial management and the proper utilisation of EU funds might lie in undertaking assessments of how far the recipient countries' systems of management and control for Union funds are operating correctly and ensuring the right use of the monies concerned.
Glede na stanje stvari in po mnenju 2/2004 Računskega sodišča ter po sporočilu Komisije o „načrtu okvira za notranjo kontrolo Skupnosti“ nacionalni nadzorni organi na pristojnih mestih (vezna skupina) razpravljajo o tem, kako lahko največ prispevajo na tem področju.
As things stand and in the wake of the Court of Auditors' Opinion 2/2004 and the Commission's communication on the 'road-map for a Community internal control framework', the national control institutions are discussing, in the relevant forums (the contact group), how best they can contribute in this area.
Potrebno je tudi opozoriti na jasno razliko med notranjim nadzorom in zunanjo revizijo: zunanji revizijski organi niso del notranjega sistema nadzora Skupnosti.
One should also note the clear distinction that exists between internal controls and external audits: the external audit bodies are not part of the Community's internal control set-up.
Poleg tega je v skladu s Pogodbo naloga Sodišča in samo Sodišča, da predloži splošno izjavo o zanesljivosti izvedbe proračuna Skupnosti.
In addition, under the Treaty it is for the Court, and the Court alone, to submit the global statement of assurance on the execution of the Community budget.
Pogodba določa sestavo Sodišča in njegove kolegijske strukture.
The Treaty defines the membership of the Court and its collegiate structure.
Sodišče pa pazljivo spremlja razvoj notranjih ali zunanjih dejavnikov, ki lahko povzročijo spremembe v njegovi organizaciji in načinu dela.
The Court, meanwhile, pays close attention to the evolution of whatever factors, internal or external, are liable to induce changes in its organisation and mode of operation.
V povezavi s tem je Sodišče prek kratkim (decembra 2004) sprejelo nov sklop notranjih pravil s ciljem povečati učinkovitost svojega delovanja (v novem okolju EU-25), pospešiti odločanje in bolj prilagodljivo upravljati svoja sredstva.
In this connection, the Court recently adopted (in December 2004) a new set of internal rules with the objectives of increasing the efficiency of its workings (in the new context of the EU-25), speeding up decision-making, and managing its resources more flexibly.
Spremembe vključujejo ustanovitev upravnega odbora, večjo vlogo revizijskih skupin in uvedbo plenarnega postopka odločanja, z razpravo in brez nje.
The changes include the creation of an Administrative Committee, a greater role for the Audit Groups, and the introduction of a plenary decision-making procedure, with and without debate.
Ti ukrepi pripravljajo podlago za prihodnje načrtovanje sistema zbornic (v luči Pogodbe iz Nice) in večjo delovno specializacijo znotraj revizijskih skupin.
These measures pave the way for future consideration of a system of chambers (in the light of the Treaty of Nice) and greater operational specialisation within the Audit Groups.
Člen 247(4) Pogodbe določa, da morajo člani Sodišča svoje dolžnosti opravljati popolnoma samostojno in v splošnem interesu Skupnosti.
Article 247(4) of the Treaty states that the members of the Court shall perform their duties in total independence and in the general Community interest.
Pri opravljanju teh nalog ne smejo zahtevati ali sprejemati nikakršnih navodil posameznih vlad ali drugih organov, prav tako ne smejo opravljati dejanj, ki niso v skladu z naravo njihovega dela.
In the performance of their duties they may not request or take instructions from any government or any other body, nor may they practise acts that are incompatible with the nature of their duties.
To je moja brezpogojna dolžnost, ki sem jo sprejel, ko sem bil prvič imenovan na Sodišče, in za katero sem slovesno zaprisegel pred Sodiščem Skupnosti.
This is my absolute duty, which I took on myself when I was first appointed to the Court and on which I swore a solemn oath before the Court of Justice.
Menim, da sem se tako zavezal k trem glavnim dolžnostim:
As I see it, I have bound myself to three fundamental undertakings:
§ da ne bom sprejemal navodil nobene vlade, organa ali organizacije;
§ to take instructions from no government, body or organisation;
§ da bom svoje dolžnosti kot član Sodišča opravljal popolnoma objektivno in nepristransko, izključno s stališča splošnega interesa Evropske unije;
§ to perform my duties as a member of the Court on a basis of total objectivity and impartiality, from the sole viewpoint of the general interest of the European Union;
§ da bodo moja dejanja popolnoma pregledna ter da bom pri svojem delovanju pošten in zavezan k molčečnosti, tudi po tem, ko ne bom več član Sodišča.
§ to adopt, in my personal conduct, a position of absolute transparency, integrity and discretion, even after having ceased to be a member of the Court.
Več kot pripravljen sem, da Parlamentu posredujem te podatke.
I am more than willing to provide Parliament with this information.
Vendar nimam nikakršnih interesov ali položajev poslovne, finančne ali politične narave ali kakršnih koli drugih obveznosti, ki bi jih bilo potrebno razodeti in ki bi lahko bili v nasprotju z opravljanjem mojih dolžnosti člana Sodišča.
However, I have no interests or positions of a commercial, financial or political nature or any other commitments to declare that might enter into conflict with the performance of my duties as a member of the Court.
Dodam naj še, da sem leta 2000, ko sem bil imenovan, predsedniku Sodišča, skladno s kodeksom ravnanja, ki velja za člane Sodišča, izročil izjavo o svojih finančnih interesih in lastnini ter o dejavnosti svoje žene.
I should add that, pursuant to the code of conduct applying to the members of the Court, I deposited with its President, when appointed in 2000, a declaration of my financial interests and property and of my spouse's activities.
Med letoma 1984 in 2000 sem bil zaposlen na Generalnem inšpektoratu za finance (IGF) kot inšpektor za finance/direktor (1989–1995) in generalni podinšpektor za finance (1995–2000).
From 1984 to 2000 I was employed at the Inspectorate-General for Finance (IGF), as Inspector of Finance/Director (1989-1995) and Sub-Inspector General of Finance (1995-2000).
Od leta 1995 sem bil odgovoren za področje Inšpektorata za usklajevanja inšpekcije Skupnosti in notranjega inšpekcijskega sistema za državno finančno upravo, kjer je bila moja poglavitna naloga razvoj in usklajevanje delovanja Inšpektorata na področju finančnega nadzora za sredstva Skupnosti, sklada EKUJS (jamstveni del), strukturnih skladov in kohezijskih skladov.
From 1995, I was responsible for the IGF's area of coordination of Community inspection and internal inspection system for the State Financial Administration, where my main task was to develop and coordinate the IGF's actions in the financial control field for Community own resources, the EAGGF (Guarantee), the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Funds.
Usklajeval sem tudi delo projektne skupine, ki je sestavila belo knjigo o sistemu notranjega nadzora državne finančne uprave.
I also coordinated the project team which drew up the White Paper on the internal control system of the state financial administration.
V okviru svojih dolžnosti sem bil predsednik medministrskega odbora za uskladitev in inšpekcijo sistema financiranja EKUJS (jamstveni del) (1995–1999) in sodeloval sem pri številnih delovnih skupinah za zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti in za boj proti goljufijam.
As part of my duties, I was chairman of the Interministerial Committee for Coordination and Inspection of the EAGGF (Guarantee) Financing System (1995-1999), and participated in a number of working groups on the protection of the Comunities' financial interests and the fight against fraud.
Bil sem član portugalske delegacije pri Svetovalnem koordinacijskem odboru za boj proti goljufijam (COCOLAF) in sodeloval sem pri delu Skupine osebnih predstavnikov finančnih ministrstev za dobro gospodarsko upravljanje (SEM 2000).
I was a member of the Portuguese delegation to the Advisory Coordination Committee for the Fight Against Fraud (COCOLAF) and a participant in the work of the Group of Personal Representatives of the Finance Ministries for sound economic management (SEM 2000).
Na področju revizije sem bil predsednik finančnega sveta INDEPD – Indústrias e Participações de Defesa, S.A. (1994–1996) in član skupnega revizijskega odbora EUROPOL (2002–2004).
Specifically in the auditing field, I have been chairman of the Fiscal Council of INDEPD – Indústrias e Participações de Defesa, S.A. (1994-1996), and have also been a member of EUROPOL's Joint Audit Committee (2002-2004).
Prav tako sem bil svetovalec OECD za pobudo SIGMA („Podpora za izboljšanje vodenja in upravljanja v državah srednje in vzhodne Evrope“), z misijami na finančnih ministrstvih Češke Republike, Poljske in Estonije.
I have also been an adviser to the OECD for the initíative known as SIGMA ('Support for Improvement in Governance and Managament in Central and Eastern European Countries') between 1997 and 1999, with missions to the finance ministries of the Czech Republic, Poland and Estonia.
Član Evropskega računskega sodišča sem od marca 2000, z nalogo revizije bančnih aktivnosti EU, vključno Evropske centralne banke, Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo, Evropskih šol, decentraliziranih teles in Euratomove Agencije za oskrbo, vse do konca leta 2001.
I have been a Member of the European Court of Auditors since March 2000, with responsibility up to the end of 2001 for auditing the EU's banking activities, including the European Central Bank, the ECSC, the European Schools, the decentralised bodies and the Euratom Supply Agency.
Od januarja 2002 sem član Sodišča, odgovoren za izjavo o zanesljivosti (DAS).
Since January 2002, I have been the Member of the Court responsible for its Statement of Assurance (DAS).
Marca 2005 sem bil izvoljen za dekana skupine CEAD (usklajenost, presoja, zanesljivost, razvoj), ki je odgovorna za vodoravne revizijske aktivnosti.
In March 2005, I was elected Dean of the CEAD Group ( Coordination, Evaluation, Assurance, Development ), responsible for horizontal audit activities.
Sem tudi član upravnega odbora Sodišča.
I am also a member of the Court's Administrative Committee.
Kot član Sodišča, odgovoren za izjavo o zanesljivosti (DAS), sem bil posebno pozoren na vprašanje revizijskih pristopov v luči razvoja nadzora, predvsem tistih pristopov, ki izvirajo iz upravne reforme Komisije (notranji sistem nadzora in posodobitev izkazov), ob hkratnem upoštevanju dvomov, ki jih je izrazil organ, ki podeljuje razrešnico.
As the Member responsible for the Court's Statement of Assurance (DAS), I have paid particular attention to the question of audit approaches in the light of developments in the control field, notably those arising from the administrative reform of the Commission (internal control system and modernisation of accounts), and also taking account of the concerns expressed by the discharge authority.
Kot sem že povedal v odgovoru na prvo vprašanje, menim, da trenutni kakovostni pristop sodišča prinaša širši razpon podatkov in ustvarja veliko dodano vrednost za uporabnike izjave DAS.
As I said in my reply to the first question, I believe that the Court's current qualitative approach is yielding a wider range of information and is generating added value for DAS users.
V čast mi je, da sem poročevalec Sodišča za mnenje o enotnem modelu revizije in o predlogu za okvir notranje kontrole Skupnosti (mnenje 2/2004), za katerega menim, da je velik prispevek Sodišča k izboljšanju finančnega poslovanja EU.
It was my privilege to be the Court's rapporteur for its opinion on the single audit model and the proposal for a Community internal control framework (opinion 2/2004), which is, I believe, a major contribution on the Court's part to improving the EU's financial management.
To mnenje je naredilo velik vtis in je odločilno vplivalo na sprejetje sporočila Komisije o „načrtu za okvir notranje kontrole Skupnosti“.
This opinion had a significant impact and was a decisive influence on the adoption of the Commission communication on the 'road-map for a Community internal control framework'.
Upam, da mi bo Parlament, predvsem pa Odbor za proračunski nadzor, ponovno poveril zaupanje, kot mi ga je že ob mojem prvem imenovanju, in upam, da bo moj prispevek k izboljšanju finančnega poslovanja EU dobil ustrezno priznanje.
It is my hope that the confidence expressed by Parliament and, in particular, the Committee on Budgetary Control at the time of my first appointment will be renewed, and that my contribution to improving the EU's financial management will also receive recognition.
Vseeno pa menim, da je pozitivno mnenje Parlamenta bistveno za opravljanje dela člana Evropskega računskega sodišča.
At all events, I believe that Parliament's favourable opinion is essential for the performance of the duties of a Member of the European Court of Auditors.
Predlaganje Vitorja Manuela da Silve Caldeire za člana Računskega sodišča
Nomination of Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira as a Member of the Court of Auditors
o imenovanju Massima Varija za člana Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Massimo Vari as a Member of the Court of Auditors
PE 364.897
PE 364.897v03-00
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION................................................3
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS MASSIMA VARIJA
ANNEX 1: CURRICULUM VITAE OF MASSIMO VARI........................................................4
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI MASSIMA VARIJA NA VPRAŠALNIK
ANNEX 2: REPLIES OF MASSIMO VARI TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE................................7
– ob upoštevanju člena 247(3) Pogodbe ES in člena 160(b)(3) Pogodbe Euratom, v skladu s katerima se je posvetoval s Svetom ( C6‑0344/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty and Article 160b (3) of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0344/2005 ),
– ker je Odbor za proračunski nadzor na svoji seji 24. novembra 2005 poslušal predstavitev kandidata Sveta za člana Računskega sodišča in obravnaval strokovno usposobljenost kandidata glede na merila, določena v členih 247(2) Pogodbe ES in 160(b)(2) Pogodbe Euratom,
– whereas at its meeting of 24 November 2005 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council's nominee for Membership of the Court of Auditors, and considered the nominee's qualifications in the light of the criteria laid down by Articles 247(2) of the EC Treaty and 160b(2) of the Euratom Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6‑0374/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6‑0374/2005 ),
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS MASSIMA VARIJA
ANNEX 1: CURRICULUM VITAE OF MASSIMO VARI
MASSIMO VARI, rojen 23. oktobra 1937 v Frosinonu.
MASSIMO VARI, born in Frosinone on 23 October 1937.
"Emeritus" podpredsednik Ustavnega sodišča.
'Emeritus' Vice-president of the Constitutional Court.
Predsednik oddelka Italijanskega računskega sodišča.
Section President of the Italian Court of Auditors.
marec 1960 Diploma iz prava na Univerzi "La Sapienza" v Rimu, z odliko 110/110.
March 1960 Degree in law from the 'La Sapienza' University in Rome, with the mark 110/110 cum laude
1960-61 Podjetniško usposabljanje na Višjem inštitutu za podjetništvo v Rimu.
1960-61 Business training course at the Higher Institute for Business Management in Rome.
1963 Usposobljenost za opravljanje poklica odvetnika.
1963 Qualified as a solicitor.
1969 Izbran na razpisu za rednega asistenta pri katedri za inštitucije javnega prava na Univerzi v Perugii.
1969 On the short list for a post as assistant ordinary professor in the faculty of public law institutions at the University of Perugia.
Poklicne dejavnosti
Professional activities
1961-1969 Uradnik pravne pisarne Sindikalnega združenja kreditnih ustanov.
1961-1969 Official in the legal office of the Trade Union Association of Credit Institutions.
1969-1972 Odvetnik pri Družbi za javni prevoz v Rimu (ATAC - Azienda dei trasporti pubblici di Roma).
1969-1972 Solicitor for the Public Transport Company (ATAC) of Rome.
Od 1972 Sodnik na Italijanskem računskem sodišču, kjer je opravljal različne vloge (v časovnem zaporedju): Revizija (1972); Državno tožilstvo (1973-1980); Oddelek lokalnih oblasti (1982-1986); Sodni oddelki (1980-1993); Kolegij združenih oddelkov za presojanje splošnih zaključnih računov države, dežel in pokrajin s posebnim statutom ter poročil Parlamentu (1988, 1989 in 1990).
From 1972 Judge at the Italian Court of Auditors assigned successively to various functions: Audit (1972); Public Attorney's Office (1973-1980); Local Authorities Section (1982-1986); Jurisdictional Sections (1980-1993); College of the Joint Sections for judgments on the general accounts of the State and special-status regions and provinces, and reports to Parliament (1988, 1989 and 1990).
1993-2000 Sodnik italijanskega Ustavnega sodišča.
1993-2000 Judge at the Italian Constitutional Court
2001-2002 Podpredsednik Ustavnega sodišča.
2001-2002 Vice-President of the Constitutional Court
Od 2002 Ponovno na Italijanskem računskem sodišču.
Since 2002 Back at the Italian Court of Auditors.
Trenutno predsednik oddelka, odgovornega za urad za usklajevanje pokrajinskih oddelkov za revizijo, in član kolegija združenih oddelkov za presojanje splošnih zaključnih računov države, dežel in pokrajin s posebnim statutom ter poročil Parlamentu.
Currently President of the Section responsible for the office coordinating the regional audit sections and Member of the College of the Joint Sections for judgments on the general accounts of the State and of special-status regions and provinces, as well as reports to Parliament.
Izobraževalne dejavnosti
Teaching activities
1986-1993 LUISS (Svobodna mednarodna univerza za družbene vede).
1986-1993 LUISS (International Free University of Social Studies).
Poučeval predmet "Evropsko računsko sodišče", v okviru študija o "Pravu Evropske skupnosti", (od akademskega leta 1986/1987 do 1991/1992) in predmet "Državno računovodstvo" (akademsko leto 1992/1993).
Taught a course on 'The European Court of Auditors', as part of the course on 'European Community law' (from the academic year 1986-1987 to the academic year 1991-1992) and a course on 'State accounting' (academic year 1992-1993).
1989, ’90, ’93 Višja šola za javno upravo.
1989, ’90, ’93 College for Public Administration.
Predavanja za javne uslužbence.
Courses for public employees.
1990-91 Univerza "Tor Vergata" v Rimu.
1990-91 'Tor Vergata' University in Rome.
Predmet "Državno računovodstvo".
Taught a course in public accounting.
2002-03 LUISS (Svobodna mednarodna univerza za družbene vede).
2002-03 LUISS (International Free University of Social Studies).
Predmet "Ustavno pravo".
Taught a course in constitutional law.
2002-06 LUMSA (Univerza Libera Università Maria Santissima Assunta).
2002-06 LUMSA (Maria Santissima Assunta Free University).
Predmet "Ustavna pravica" (od akademskega leta 2002/2003 do 2005/2006) in predmet "Upravno pravo" (akademski leti 2004/2005 in 2005/2006)
Taught a course in constitutional justice (from the academic year 2002-2003 to the academic year 2005-2006) and a course in administrative law (academic years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006).
javnega pomena
in the public sphere
1980 Član javne komisije, ki preučuje zakonodajo na področju znanstvenih raziskav.
1980 Member of a public commission set up to study legislation relating to scientific research.
1981 Predsednik javne komisije, ki preučuje organizacijo samostojnega oddelka za "kreditiranje malih podjetij in obrtništva".
1981 Chairman of a public commission set up to study the setting up of an autonomous section 'credit for small industry and craft industries'.
1988 Predsednik javne komisije, ki preučuje stanovanjsko gradbeništvo.
1988 Chairman of a public commission set up to study housing.
1989 Član javne komisije, ki preučuje reformo postopkov revizije in pravne predpise Italijanskega računskega sodišča.
1989 Member of a public commission set up to study the reform of audit and the rules of the Italian Court of Auditors.
1990 Podpredsednik Sodišča otroštvo in družba, ki ga je ustanovil inštitut italijanskega
1990 Vice-President of the Court on Infancy and Society, set up by the Italian Committee for UNICEF.
1991 Član javne komisije, ki preučuje varstvo, določanje vrednosti in promet kulturnih dobrin glede na dovršitev Enotnega evropskega trga.
1991 Member of a public commission set up to study the protection, enhancement and movement of cultural assets with a view to the completion of the European Single Market.
1992 Član skupine pri Ministrstvu za zunanje zadeve, ki preučuje vprašanja v zvezi z bojem proti drogam in organiziranim kriminalom.
1992 Member of a study group set up within the Ministry for Foreign Affairs on issues relating to combating drugs and organised crime