natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Avstralija, Bolivija, Brazilija, Brunej, Kanada, Kostarika, Gvatemala, Honduras, Malezija, Mehika, Nova Zelandija (pogodba o ukinitvi zahtev za vizume za vse nove države članice je podpisana, ni pa še stopila v veljavo), Nikaragva, Panama, Paragvaj, Salvador, Singapur, Združene države, Urugvaj, Venezuela.
Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Brunei, Canada, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand (visa exemption agreement concerning all new Member States signed but not yet entered into force), Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Salvador, Singapore, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela
Uredba št. 539/2001, ki vsebuje seznam tretjih držav, katerih državljani morajo imeti ob prestopu zunanjih mej in mej vizume, in tistih, za katere ta zahteva ne velja
Regulation No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement
UL L 81, 213.2001, str.
OJ L 81, 21/3/2001, p.
Dejstvo pa je, da se države članice še niso nikoli sklicevale na to klavzulo, ki je začela veljati že leta 2001.
Since its entry into force in 2001 this clause was, however, never invoked by a Member State.
Komisije meni, da je vzrok tega okoren in avtomatičen mehanizem.
In the views of the Commission this is due to the rigidity and automatism of the mechanism.
Obvestilo prizadete države članice lahko vodi do „večje krize [...] v zunanjih odnosih s tretjo državo ali do notranje krize“, saj „lahko le Svet blokira drugo stopnjo mehanizma [...]“, to pa je odločitev, ki pomeni, da je „država članica zavrnila solidarno delovanje“ (obrazložitev, str.
A notification by a "victim Member State" would either lead to a "major crisis [...] in external relations with the third country concerned or internally" because the "mechanism's second stage can be blocked only by Council [...]", a decision which would be seen "as a refusal by the Member States to act in solidarity" (p.
Predlog Komisije
The proposal of the Commission
Komisija zato predlaga nov „bolj prilagodljiv in realističen“ (obrazložitev, str.
The Commission therefore proposes a new "more flexible and more realistic" (p.
Komisiji daje pravzaprav šestmesečni rok, v katerem lahko z diplomatskimi sredstvi poskusi ponovno uveljaviti potovanje brez vizuma.
It essentially provides the Commission with a six-months period in which it can try by diplomatic means to re-establish visa-free travel.
Prav tako pomembne so dodatno predlagane spremembe, da mora „prizadeta država članica“ opozoriti Komisijo in da lahko le-ta, po stikih s tretjo državo, predlaga začasno ponovno uveljavitev vizumske obveznosti za državljane zadevne tretje države.
Additional important proposed changes are that "victim Member States" have an obligation for notification and that the Commission, following its contacts with the third country, may or may not propose the temporary restoration of the visa requirement for citizens of the third country concerned.
Po predlogu Komisije bi bilo treba uveljaviti isti mehanizem v zvezi z obstoječimi primeri zgoraj omenjene nevzajemnosti.
According to the Commission's proposal the same mechanism should be applied as regards the existing cases of non-reciprocity mentioned above.
Komisija verjame, da bo tak mehanizem bolj učinkovit, saj bo uporabljan.
The Commission believes that such a mechanism will be more effective because it will be used.
Poročevalec se na splošno strinja s filozofijo in glavnimi elementi predloga Komisije.
The rapporteur generally agrees with the philosophy and the main elements of the Commission's proposal.
Trenutni mehanizem je preveč radikalen, da bi bil lahko učinkovit.
The current mechanism is too radical to be effective.
Poročevalec kljub temu meni, da bi morali mehanizmu dodati drugo stopnjo za večjo učinkovitost.
He is, however, of the opinion that a second phase should be added to the mechanism to make it more effective.
Predlaga tudi, da bi se moral koncept vzajemnosti razumeti bolj na splošno, kot to predvideva predlog, in da bi lahko vseboval pogoje in postopke, ki ovirajo prosto potovanje.
Finally, he proposes that the concept of reciprocity should be understood in a wider sense than proposed to include conditions and procedures which constitute an obstacle to free travel.
Poročevalec predlaga niz sprememb, ki odsevajo tri cilje.
The rapporteur proposes a series of amendments to the mechanism which reflect upon three objectives.
Prvič, seznam mora biti učinkovit.
Firstly, the mechanism needs to be effective.
Prvotni cilj ukrepov EU mora biti prosto potovanje za vse državljane EU v tiste države, ki za vstop v EU ne potrebujejo vizuma.
The primordial objective of the EU's action needs to be free travel for all our citizens to those countries that benefit from visa-free access to the EU.
Poročevalec vidi v predlaganem mehanizmu šibkost, saj le-ta ne predvideva nadaljnjih postopkov, če se Komisija odloči, da po šestih mesecih ne bo ukrepala.
The rapporteur sees a weakness in the proposed mechanism because it does not provide for a follow-up if the Commission chooses not to act after six months.
Prav tako obstaja tveganje, da bodo tretje države domnevale, da se ne bo nič zgodilo in da bodo stvari ostale nespremenjene.
There is a risk that third countries assume that nothing will happen and things remain as they are.
Poročevalec zato predlaga, da se doda še eno obdobje šestih mesecev, v katerem ima Komisija možnost, da ponovno uveljavi potovanje brez vizuma.
The rapporteur therefore proposes to add a second period of six months in which the Commission has the possibility to re-establish visa-free travel.
Ob koncu šestmesečnega obdobja, naj bi Komisija podala predlog za nadaljnje ukrepe.
At the end of this second six-months period the Commission should then have the obligation to make a proposal for further action.
V takem drugem obdobju bi imela Komisija sredstva, s katerimi bi izvajala večji pritisk na zadevno tretjo državo, saj lahko poudari, da mora v primeru, da ne pride do uvedbe potovanj brez vizuma, podati predlog.
In such a second period the Commission would have the means to put more pressure on the third country in question because it can point out that in case of non-establishment of visa-free travel it has the obligation to make a proposal.
S tem, ko se doda element trdnosti, se okrepi solidarnost med državami članicami, še posebno če se upošteva, da posamezne države članice na tem področju, na katerem ima Skupnost izključno pristojnost, nimajo pristojnosti enostranskega ukrepanja.
By adding an element of firmness the solidarity between Member States is reinforced keeping in mind that in this area of exclusive Community competence individual Member States are deprived of the power to act unilaterally.
Ni primerno, da bi morale nove države članice, ki morajo spoštovati Uredbo št. 539/2001, v prihodnjih letih sprejemati državljane tretjih držav brez vizuma, medtem ko jo bodo njihovi državljani potrebovali za obisk te tretje države.
It is not reasonable that for years to come new Member States which are bound to respect Regulation 539/2001 have to accept nationals of third countries without a visa while their citizens need one to visit that third country.
Ta poseben položaj, ki je nastal po širitvi, zahteva, da se v primerjavi z drugimi kriteriji okrepi kriterij vzajemnosti, ki je eden od kriterijev, s katerim se določa, kateri državljani tretjih držav morajo imeti vizum za vstop v EU (uvodna izjava 5 Uredbe št. 539/2001).
This particular situation following enlargement requires that the criteria of reciprocity as one of the criteria to determine those third countries whose nationals are subject to the visa requirement by the EU (recital 5 of Regulation 539/2001) should be strengthened in comparison to the other criteria.
Drugič, vlogo Komisije je treba okrepiti.
Secondly, the role of the Commission needs to be reinforced.
Da bi bila Komisija verodostojen pogajalec vis-à-vis tretjih držav, bi se moralo Komisijo pooblastiti in jo obvezati, da na koncu morebitnega drugega obdobja šestih mesecev predlaga uvedbo vizumske obveznosti za državljane iz zadevnih tretjih držav ali kateri koli drug ukrep na področju zunanjih odnosov.
In order to be a credible negotiator vis-à-vis third countries the Commission should not only get the power but also the obligation to propose at the end of an eventual second period of six months either the establishment of the visa obligations for nationals from the third country concerned or any other measure in the field of external relations like outlined above.
Poročevalec se iz istega razloga strinja s predlaganimi roki za obvestilo države članice (precej kratek rok 10 dni) in z ukrepi Komisije (precej dolg rok šestih mesecev).
For the same reason the rapporteur agrees with the deadlines proposed for notification by Member States (the rather short deadline of 10 days) and action by the Commission (the rather long deadline of six months).
Tretjič, postopek mora biti pregleden in demokratičen.
Thirdly, the process needs to be more transparent and democratic.
Državljani morajo vedeti, da si Skupnost zanje v njihovem imenu prizadeva za ukinitev vizumske obveznosti.
Citizens have to know that the Community acts on their behalf to abolish visa requirements for them.
Evropski parlament lahko pomaga zagotoviti preglednost postopka in demokratično odgovornost, če je obveščen in če ima možnost ukrepati.
The European Parliament can help to ensure transparency of the process and democratic accountability if it is kept informed and has a possibility to react.
Vzajemnost v širšem smislu
Reciprocity in a wider sense
Poročevalec obžaluje, da je Komisija predlagala zelo ozko zasnovan pojem vzajemnosti.
The rapporteur regrets that the Commission used a very narrow concept of reciprocity for its proposal.
Ukvarja se le z vprašanjem, ali bo tretja država uvedla ali ohranila vizumsko obveznost.
The question is only whether a third country introduces or keeps a visa requirement.
V svoji delovni dokumentaciji o vzajemnosti vizumov
In its staff working paper on reciprocity in visas
Težko je razumeti, zakaj je Komisija pripravila delovno dokumentacijo, pri tem pa ni izpolnila svoje pravne obveze, tj.
It needs to be mentioned that it is difficult to understand why the Commission writes a staff working document while it ignores the legal obligation to present a report on the implications of reciprocity to Parliament and Council by 30 June 2003 as laid down in Article 2 of Reg.
Parlamentu in Svetu ni predstavila poročila o vključitvi vzajemnosti do 30. junija 2003, kot določa člen 2 Uredbe št. 453/2003. je Komisija nanizala vrsto drugih okoliščin, ki predstavljajo kršitev vzajemnosti, ni pa jih v predstavljanem predlogu tudi obravnavala.
453/2003. the Commission listed a series of other circumstances which constitute breaches of reciprocity without being addressed by the present proposal.
To velja v primeru, da na primer tretje države ukinejo vizume za bivanje, krajše od treh mesecev, medtem ko schengenski pravni red določa, da lahko državljani tretjih držav v schengenskem prostoru bivajo največ tri mesece v naslednjih šestih mesecih.
This is for example the case if third countries grant visa exemptions for stays of less than three months while the Schengen acquis provides that third country nationals can stay within the Schengen area for up to three months in any half-year.
Obstajajo tudi primeri, v katerih se poleg kriterija državljanstva uporabljajo tudi drugi kriteriji za določanje vizumske obveznosti (na primer, Nemci, ki so se rodili pred 1. januarjem 1928, potrebujejo za potovanje v Izrael, vizum).
There are also cases in which other criteria than nationality are used to determine the visa requirement (for example in case of Germans visiting Israel those who were born before 1 January 1928 need a visa).
Komisija poleg tega ne upošteva problematike vzajemnosti v pogojih in postopkih za izdajanje vizumov (kot je zapisano na str.
In addition, the Commission does not take into consideration the issue of reciprocity in the conditions and procedures for issuing visas (as it states on p.
2 zgoraj omenjene delovne dokumentacije).
2 of the above mentioned staff working paper).
Pogoji in postopki lahko resnično ovirajo pridobitev vizuma, npr. če pride do nenadnih sprememb v zahtevanih dokumentih (npr. potrdilo o virusu HIV ali zavarovanje potovanja zahtevajo le določena podjetja) ali če je splošna politika, „da se postopek čim bolj oteži in naredi neprijeten“.
Conditions and procedures, however, can constitute real obstacles for obtaining a visa, for example if sudden changes are made in the documents that are required (like an HIV certificate or travel insurance only from certain companies) or if there is a general policy "to make it as difficult and unpleasant as possible".
Komisija se trenutno pogaja z Rusko federacijo prav o teh pogojih in postopkih, da bi dosegla pogodbo o njihovem olajšanju.
Currently the Commission negotiates with the Russian Federation on precisely these conditions and procedures in order to reach a facilitation agreement.
Po drugi strani pa je treba obravnavati tudi primere, v katerih je opustitev vizumske obveznosti predmet pogojev.
On the other hand cases where the visa exemption is subject to conditions should also be looked at.
Tak primer je na primer program vizumske opustitve v Združenih državah, ki vsebuje pogoj, da sodelujoče države uvedejo biometrične potne liste, da bi bile še vedno oproščene vizumov.
This is for example the case with the Visa Waiver Programme of the US which now has as one condition that participating countries introduce biometric passports in order to be able to continue to benefit from the visa exemption.
Da bi na take ovire ustrezno odgovorili, poročevalec predlaga, da se razširi mehanizem in tako bolje zadovolji resnične potrebe.
To respond to such obstacles the rapporteur proposes to extend the mechanism to better meet the real needs.
Ta drugi mehanizem je zasnovan na tistem mehanizmu, ki je bil predlagan za primer uvedbe vizumske obveznosti.
This second mechanism is based on the one proposed in case of the introduction of the visa requirement.
Poročevalec v zvezi s tem poudarja, da bi morala EU razjasniti in ukiniti lastne nesorazmerne zahteve, kot je zahteva za dokumente, ki so potrebni za pridobitev vizuma (sistem vabil), ali obvezna prijava (člen 22 Konvencije o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma).
The rapporteur underlines in this context that the EU should also clarify and abolish itself its own disproportionate requirements like for example regarding the documents required to obtain a visa (system of invitations) or the obligation to register (Article 22 of the Schengen Implementing Convention).
Revizija skupnih konzularnih navodil je nujno potrebna, zato pritiska poročevalec na Komisijo, da bi pripravila tak predlog najkasneje do začetka leta 2006.
A revision of the Common Consular Instructions is urgently required and the rapporteur urges the Commission to make such a proposal by early 2006 at the latest.
Poročevalec v zvezi s tem vljudno vabi Komisijo, da na splošno več pozornosti posveti vizumski problematiki, ki se je pojavila po nedavni reviziji pogodbe in še posebno po širitvi EU.
In this context the rapporteur would like to invite the Commission to focus more attention on visa questions in general that developed after the recent treaty revisions and in particular after EU enlargement.
Državljane EU in državljane tretjih držav, ki želijo obiskati EU, so zaskrbljeni v zvezi s celotnim področjem.
The whole area is one of great concern to citizens and to third country nationals wishing to visit the EU.
Evropske institucije morajo prevzeti odgovornost, ki jim je bila dodeljena v tej novem položaju.
The European institutions today have to assume the responsibility that was given to them in this new situation.
Pomembno je, da se pripravi preglednejši schengenski pravni red in pravni red Skupnosti ter da se zagotovi harmonizirana uveljavitev tega reda.
It is absolutely crucial to get firstly the Schengen and Community acquis straight and secondly to ensure its harmonised application.
Predlog ne obravnava možnosti državljanov EU, ki so brez nacionalnega državljanstva, da potujejo znotraj EU, za kar je prav tako treba poiskati rešitev.
The possibilities of stateless EU citizens to travel within the Union are not covered by this proposal and have to be solved.
Ravnanje na področju vizumov in vzajemnosti se mora za mednarodno skupnost izkazati še posebej vzorno.
This application in the field of visas and reciprocity show itself to be especially exemplary vis-à-vis the international community.
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve
OPINION OF THE CommiTTEE ON FOREIGN affairs
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta , ki se nanaša na spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001 glede mehanizma vzajemnosti
on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 as regards the reciprocity mechanism
Odbor za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve je bil zaprošen za spremembo predloga uredbe Sveta, ki se nanaša na spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001 glede mehanizmov vzajemnosti.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs was appointed committee responsible for amending the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 as regards the reciprocity mechanism.
Od leta 2001 do sedaj mehanizem vzajemnosti pravzaprav nikoli ni bil sprožen, glavni razlog za zavračanje držav članic je bil v primeru tretjih držav, za katere velja sistem vizumov.
The mechanism has never in fact been used since its introduction in 2001, mainly because Member States subject to a visa requirement from third countries have been unwilling to request initiating it.
Mehanizem, ki je preveč tog in z avtomatičnem karakterjem, je odvračal države članice, da bi se zatekle k njemu, s čimer so se izognile povzročanju kriz večjih razsežnosti, predvsem na področju zunanjih odnosov.
Its excessive rigidity and virtually automatic nature have discouraged Member States from using it for fear of sparking off a major crisis in the field of foreign relations.
Sedanji mehanizem je potrebno ponovno pregledati tako, da bo bolj uporaben in prožen, tako da se bo upoštevala politična in diplomatska razsežnost, neločljiva od njegovega izvajanja.
The current mechanism needed revising to make it more operational and flexible, so as to take account of the political and diplomatic dimension that is an inherent aspect of its use.
V ta namen je potrebno poskrbeti, da se obvestilo Komisiji posreduje tudi Svetu, in da lahko država članica v okviru tega obvestila zaprosi Komisijo za določen rok pred sprožitvijo instrumenta.
Accordingly there needs to be provision for ensuring that notification to the Commission is also passed on to the Council, and that the Member State may as part of the notifying process request a period of notice from the Commission before triggering the mechanism.
Prav tako mora biti ohranjena možnost, da država članica poda mnenje o celoti ukrepov, ki jih lahko sprejme namesto ali kot dopolnitev pri vzpostavitvi vizumske obveznosti za zadevno tretjo državo.
It must also be possible to deliver an opinion on a range of measures that could be taken in place of or in addition to reintroduction of the visa requirement with the third country concerned.
Poleg tega Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, naj preuči možnost Evropske unije za razvoj vrste dodatnih in sorazmernih mehanizmov, ustreznih za vse situacije nevzajemnosti.
Further, the Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs to look into the desirability of the European Union devising a series of additional and proportionate mechanisms to respond to any situation of non-reciprocity.
Sankcije lahko vključujejo vse politične, gospodarske in diplomatske ukrepe, ki jih ima na voljo Evropska unija.
Such sanctions could include any of the political, commercial and diplomatic measures available to the European Union.
Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb.
The Committee therefore asks the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report.
Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(2)Zaradi resnosti situacij nevzajemnosti je potrebno, da jih zadevna ali zadevne zadevne države članice obvezno naznanijo.
(2) Given the seriousness of such situations of non-reciprocity, it is essential that they should be notified without fail by the Member State(s) concerned.
Da dosežemo, da zadevna tretja država ponovno opusti vizumsko obveznost za državljane zadevne države članice, je treba predvideti mehanizem kombinacije dejanj na različnih stopnjah in različno intenzivno, ki se lahko zelo hitro uporabijo.
To ensure that the third country in question again applies visa-free travel to nationals of the Member States concerned, a mechanism should be provided which, will combine measures at variable levels and intensities that can be rapidly carried out.
Tako je potrebno, da Komisija brez odloga začne s postopki pri tretji državi, poda poročilo Svetu, ter ima v vsakem trenutku možnost, da Svetu predlaga sprejem začasne odločitve za ponovno uvedbo vizumske obveznosti za državljane zadevne tretje države.
Thus the Commission should take steps with the third country without delay, report to the Council and be able at any moment to propose that the Council adopt a provisional decision restoring the visa requirement for nationals of the third country in question.
(2)Zaradi resnosti situacij nevzajemnosti je potrebno, da jih zadevna ali zadevne zadevne države članice obvezno naznanijo.
Given the seriousness of such situations of non-reciprocity, it is essential that they should be notified without fail by the Member State(s) concerned.
Tako je potrebno, da Komisija brez odloga začne s postopki pri tretji državi, poda poročilo Svetu in Parlamentu , ter ima v vsakem trenutku možnost, da Svetu predlaga sprejem začasne odločitve za ponovno uvedbo vizumske obveznosti za državljane zadevne tretje države.
Thus the Commission should take steps with the third country without delay, report to the Council and Parliament and be able at any moment to propose that the Council adopt a provisional decision restoring the visa requirement for nationals of the third country in question.
Zatekanje k taki začasni odločitvi ne sme predstavljati ovire za možnost premestitve zadevne tretje države v Prilogo I Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001.
Resorting to such a provisional decision should not make it impossible to transfer the third country in question to Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Pomembno je, da je Evropski parlament v celoti obveščen o situaciji nevzajemnosti, da lahko na tej osnovi sprejme ustrezne ukrepe in merila, zlasti v okviru mednarodnih odnosov z zadevno državo.
Parliament needs to be fully informed on the non-reciprocity situation so that it can take any action it sees fit, particularly in the area of foreign relations with the country concerned.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA (a)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (a)
(a) v desetih dneh, ko tretja država uvede ali uporabi vizumsko obveznost, zadevna država članica o tem pisno obvesti Komisijo; to obvestilo je objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, serija C;.
(a) within ten days of such introduction, or its announcement, the Member State concerned shall notify the Council and the Commission in writing; the notification shall be published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union;
Pomembno je, da sta Svet in Komisija istočasno obveščena o utemeljitvi tretje države glede uvedbe vizumske obveznosti za državljane države članice.
It is important for the Council to be informed at the same time as the Commission of a third country’s introduction of the visa requirement for nationals of a Member State.