natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vedno večje razlike so za Evropsko unijo velik izziv, da bo lahko nova strukturna politika še naprej izpolnjevala cilje pogodbe v skladu s členom 158, tj. okrepila gospodarsko in socialno kohezijo ter zmanjšala razvojne razlike različnih regij.
These widening disparities present the European Union with a daunting challenge: how to ensure that the new structural policy continues to pursue the Treaty objective, set out in Article 158, of strengthening its economic and social cohesion and reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions.
Zato je toliko bolj pomembno, da se omejena sredstva porazdelijo razumno, učinkovito in koncentrirano.
It is therefore particularly important to use the scant resources available in an intelligent, efficient and concentrated manner.
Pomemben instrument za doseganje tega so strateške smernice Skupnosti, ki so predvidene v členih 23 in 24 predloga splošne uredbe o strukturnih skladih (KOM 2004 (492)).
The Community's strategic guidelines which are provided for in Article 23 and 24 of the proposal for a general regulation on the Structural Funds (COM(2004) (492)) are an important instrument for achieving this end.
Te v skladu s tem predlogom oblikujejo okvir za posredovanje skladov in bodo v skladu s postopkom soglasja iz člena 161 Pogodbe sprejete v treh mesecih od začetka veljavnosti splošne uredbe o strukturnih skladih.
According to these guidelines, they constitute the framework for Fund interventions and, according to the assent procedure set out in Article 161 of the Treaty, must be adopted within three months of the entry into force of the general regulation on the Structural Funds.
Pomen in namen smernic
Rationale and purpose of the guidelines
Strateške smernice Skupnosti so cilj kohezijske politike v obdobju 2007–2013 usmerile k izboljšanju evropske konkurenčnosti za podporo rasti in novim delovnim mestom.
The purpose of the Community's structural guidelines is to ensure that in the period 2007 to 2013 cohesion policy is more geared to increasing European competitiveness in the support of growth and jobs.
Za dosego tega Skupnost poudarja zlasti znanje, inovacije in povečanje vrednosti človeškega kapitala.
In order to achieve this, the Community has made knowledge, innovation and the development of human capital its priorities.
Pri tem morajo smernice na področju skladov strateški okvirni načrt in tudi operativne programe posamezne države bolj usmeriti k lizbonski ter göteborški strategiji.
The cross-fund guidelines are intended to ensure that national strategic framework plans, and thus operational programmes, particularly, are more closely geared to the Lisbon and Göteborg strategies.
Pri tem Komisija od ravni načrtovanja programov pričakuje zlasti, da:
The Commission hopes that at the programme planning stage:
a) se okrepi strateška razsežnost kohezijske politike,
(a) the strategic dimension of cohesion policy will be reinforced;
b) se v praksi v večji meri sprejmeta lizbonska in göteborška strategija.
(b) the players on the ground adhere themselves more closely to the Lisbon and Göteborg strategy.
Zato smernice predlagajo, da sofinancirani programi sredstva namenijo za naslednje tri prednostne naloge:
To this end, the guidelines propose that the cofunded programmes should use the resources for the following three priorities:
S horizontalnega vidika smernice prispevajo zlasti k pomenu mest za rast in nova delovna mesta, podpiranju gospodarske diverzifikacije podeželskih območij ter čezmejno in medregionalno sodelovanje.
As regards horizontal aspects, the guidelines focus in particular on the importance of cities for growth and employment, on the promotion of the economic diversification of rural areas and on transfrontier and interregional cooperation.
Stališče in pobude Evropskega parlamenta
Position and suggestions of the European Parliament
Evropski parlament pozdravlja dejstvo, da strateške smernice določajo prednostne naloge Skupnosti za spodbujanje uravnoteženega, usklajenega in trajnostnega razvoja.
The European Parliament welcomes the fact that the strategic guidelines set the Community’s priorities in promoting balanced, harmonious and sustainable development.
Preden Evropski parlament v skladu s členom 161 o strateških smernicah odloči s privolitvijo, želi opozoriti na nekatere točke, ki so ob uporabi strateških smernic zlasti pomembne za uspeh nove strukturne politike.
Before the European Parliament decides to give its assent, in accordance with Article 161 of the Treaty, it would like to draw attention to a number of points which will determine the success of the new structural policy based on the strategic guidelines.
Pohvalno je, da se kohezijska politika bolj usmerja k lizbonski strategiji, a v zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je izvajanje lizbonske strategije najprej naloga držav članic.
It is commendable that cohesion policy should be more closely geared to the Lisbon Strategy, but it should be pointed out in this connection that the application of the Lisbon Strategy is primarily a matter for the Member States.
Kohezijska politika ne more nadomestiti prizadevanj držav članic, ki so potrebna na veliko političnih področjih, da se uresničijo cilji lizbonske strategije.
Cohesion policy cannot replace the efforts of Member States which are necessary in many policy areas in order to attain the Lisbon Strategy's ambitious targets.
Tako evropski strukturni skladi, na primer, ne morejo neposredno prispevati k zmanjšanju števila prekinitev šolanja, kar zahtevajo smernice.
For example, the European Structural Funds cannot make any direct contribution to reducing the number of pupils leaving school, as demanded in the guidelines.
To je predvsem odgovornost držav članic.
It is the Member States which are primarily responsible for this.
Tu ne smejo nastati neutemeljena pričakovanja.
We must not nurture unrealistic expectations.
Nadalje se lizbonske strategije, tj. okrepitev vseevropske konkurenčnosti, ne sme izvajati na račun doseganja cilja okrepljene socialne in gospodarske kohezije, ampak je treba v okviru strateških smernic vedno prispevati k njeni okrepitvi.
Furthermore, the Lisbon Strategy, i.e. the drive to boost competitiveness throughout Europe, must not be pursued at the expense of achieving stronger social and economic cohesion, but rather must contribute to strengthening this cohesion within the framework of the strategic guidelines.
Lizbonska strategija mora delovati vzporedno z göteborško strategijo o trajnostnem gospodarskem razvoju.
The Lisbon Strategy must go hand in hand with the Göteborg strategy on sustainable economic development.
Göteborška strategija ni podrejena lizbonski.
The Göteborg strategy is not secondary to the Lisbon Strategy.
Strukturni skladi se lahko uporabljajo le za ukrepe, ki so v skladu s cilji iz Göteborga.
The Structural Funds may only be used for measures which are in line with the Göteborg objectives.
Nevladne organizacije so upravičeno izrazile kritiko, da to dejstvo v strateških smernicah ni dovolj poudarjeno.
Many non-governmental organisations have complained, no doubt justifiably, that this is not made clear enough in the strategic guidelines.
V zvezi s tem mora predlog Komisije kritično obravnavati namensko rezerviranje sredstev („ Earmarking “).
In this connection, we need to take a critical look at the Commission proposal for the earmarking of appropriations.
Razvrstitev ukrepov na tiste, ki prispevajo, in tiste, ki ne prispevajo k lizbonski strategiji, je težavna.
The classification of measures as measures which contribute to the Lisbon Strategy, or measures that do not, is problematical.
Razen tega namensko rezerviranje sredstev iz strukturnih skladov pomeni nevarnost, da regije ne bomo imele potrebne prožnosti pri oblikovanju programov za reševanje lokalnih in regionalnih potreb.
Moreover, there is a danger that the earmarking of Structural Fund appropriations will not give the regions the flexibility they need in developing the programmes to meet their local and regional requirements.
Razen tega je treba preprečiti, da se „namensko“ oblikuje nova nadzorna birokracija, ki bo otežila hitro izdelavo programov in izvajanje projektov.
Care must also be taken to prevent ‘earmarking' leading to the introduction of a new set of bureaucratic controls which make it difficult to draw up the programmes and implement the projects rapidly.
Tu je zlasti pomembno, kdo določa, kateri ukrepi bodo zajeti v lizbonski strategiji.
It is particularly important who decides which measures form part of the Lisbon Strategy.
Na primer, predsednik Komisije, ki je predlagatelj pobude namenskega rezerviranja sredstev („ Earmarking “), meni, da gradnja vseevropske prometne infrastrukture ne spada v lizbonsko strategijo.
For example, the Commission President, who put forward the idea of earmarking in the first place, seems to believe that the extension of trans-European transport infrastructures is not part of the Lisbon Strategy.
To stališče je morda vprašljivo.
This position is open to question.
Dodatna pomanjkljivost zdajšnjega predloga Komisije o strateških smernicah je nezadostno upoštevanje urbane razsežnosti.
The current Commission proposal on the strategic guidelines can also be criticised for failing to take into account sufficiently the urban dimension.
Strnjena mestna naselja se zaradi gospodarskih in socialnih razlik srečujejo z veliko težavami, kot so velik obseg prometa, visoka stopnja kriminalitete ali slaba okoljska kakovost, ki jih je treba reševati bolje.
Owing to their economic and social disparities, conurbations are beset by numerous problems, for example heavy traffic, soaring crime rates and environmental pollution, and these need to be addressed more effectively.
Okrepitev spodbujanja mestnega okolja je zaželena.
Assistance for urban areas must be increased.
Pobuda JESSICA je v zvezi s tem pomemben korak v pravo smer.
The JESSICA initiative is an important step in the right direction.
Nadaljnja pomembna pobuda Parlamenta je načelo partnerstva.
The European Parliament also sets great store by the partnership principle.
Kontekst znatnega vključevanja socialnih partnerjev, nevladnih organizacij in občin v okviru načela partnerstva je razumljivo neugoden.
The context for the close involvement of social partners, non-governmental organisations and municipalities under the partnership principle could hardly be less promising.
Za pripravo programa ni ostalo veliko časa.
There is little time left for preparing the programmes.
Zato pogajanja o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu, uredbi in smernicah potekajo vzporedno, medtem pa si države članice in njihove regije prizadevajo čim bolj dodelati programska vprašanja.
This is why negotiations on the Interinstitutional Agreement and on the regulations and guidelines are being conducted simultaneously, while the Member States and their regions are already endeavouring to draw up the new programmes as far as possible.
V teh okoliščinah je toliko bolj pomembno vztrajati na načelu partnerstva, ki je z vidika Evropskega parlamenta pomemben dejavnik za uspešno izvajanje programa.
Under these circumstances, it is particularly important to insist on the partnership principle which, in the eyes of the European Parliament, is a key factor in determining the success of the implementation of the programmes.
Nujno je, da so vsi udeleženci na kraju samem na lokalni in regionalni ravni, vključno s socialnimi partnerji in civilno družbo, vključeni v načrtovanje in izvajanje programa.
It is absolutely crucial that all those concerned on the ground at local and regional level, including the social partners and civil society, be involved in the planning and implementation of programmes.
To je nujna predpostavka, da strateške smernice izpolnjujejo svoj cilj, in sicer da udeleženci na kraju samem lizbonsko strategijo čim bolj sprejmejo.
This is the indispensable precondition for ensuring that the strategic guidelines attain their objective, which is to ensure that the players on the ground adhere more closely to the Lisbon strategy.
Evropski parlament meni, da se uspešno izvajanje programov v času omejene javne blagajne lahko doseže tudi s spodbujanjem zasebnega sofinanciranja na ravni projektov.
The European Parliament believes that at a time when public funds are scarce, it is permissible to promote private co-funding for projects in order to ensure the successful implementation of the programmes.
Pri tem je treba ohranjati načelo dodatnosti sredstev, tj. nacionalne države morajo skupaj z Unijo in javnimi sredstvi vedno podpirati strukturno politiko.
However it is important to ensure compliance with the principle of the additionality of resources, i.e. Member States must always support structural policy with public funds in conjunction with the EU.
Partnerstva med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem v zvezi s strukturnimi skladi nastajajo le redko, ker se zastavlja veliko nerazjasnjenih pravnih vprašanj.
Public-private partnerships are, unfortunately, only very seldom used in connection with the Structural Funds, since they raise a host of unresolved legal questions.
Evropski parlament poziva Komisijo, da prispeva k oblikovanju ustreznega pravnega okvira v državah članicah.
The European Parliament calls upon the Commission to help establish an appropriate legal framework in the Member States.
Strukturni skladi lahko prispevajo tudi h gospodarski in socialni enakosti žensk.
The Structural Funds also have a contribution to make in advancing the economic and social equality of women.
Izkušnje s pobudo Skupnosti EQUAL so dobre in jo je treba nadaljevati tudi v novem programskem obdobju.
Experience with the Community initiative EQUAL has been positive, and this should continue in the new programming period.
To morajo kazati tudi strateške smernice.
This must also be reflected in the strategic guidelines.
Pri tem bi bilo zlasti zaželeno, da se izmenjava „najboljših praks“ prek mreže izkušenj nadalje uporablja kot pomemben instrument.
It is particularly desirable that exchanges of ‘best practices’ through networks continue to be employed as an important instrument.
Nenazadnje je treba ponovno opozoriti na namene Evropskega sveta iz decembra 2005, da v okviru kohezijske politike uvede različne pravne standarde za stare in nove države članice.
Last but not least, we should also refer again to the intention of the European Council in December 2005 to introduce different legal standards within the framework of cohesion policy for the old and new Member States.
Evropski parlament je to zavrnil.
The European Parliament rejects this approach.
Le izjema za uporabo pravila N + 2 do leta 2010 je nujna.
It takes the view that all that is needed is a derogation for the application of the N+2 rule up to 2010.
V zvezi s stopnjami sofinanciranja, upravičenostjo davka na dodano vrednost in gradnjo socialnih stanovanj morajo v celotni Uniji veljati enaka pravila.
As regards cofunding rates, the eligibility of VAT and the construction of social housing should be subject to the same rules throughout the EU.
Komisija je pri okrepitvi človeških virov glavno pozornost namenila prožnosti delojemalk in delojemalcev v celotni Evropi.
In enhancing human resources, one of the Commission’s priorities is the Europe-wide flexibility of workers.
Pri tem je treba seveda upoštevati, da
It is important to bear in mind in this connection that:
Zlasti v obmejnih regijah temu ni zadoščeno,
Particularly in border areas, this is often not the case.
V takšnih primerih je smiselno okrepiti storilnost regij, da se prepreči čezmerno odseljevanje.
In these cases, it may be useful to reinforce existing potential of these regions in order to avoid excessive emigration.
Tudi tema „ozemeljska kohezija“ se v smernicah Komisije ne upošteva zadostno.
The item ‘territorial cohesion’ is another issue which has not yet been sufficiently addressed in the Commission’s guidelines.
Odbor regij je v mnenju to tudi jasno navedel.
The Committee of the Regions also made this clear in its opinion.
Evropski parlament bi lahko to stališče tudi prevzel v svojem mnenju (glej točki 34 in 36).
The European Parliament could adopt this position also in its opinion (see paragraph 34 and 36).
Evropski parlament je prepričan, da bosta Komisija in Svet upoštevala njegove pobude, ki so potrebne, da Evropski parlament odobri strateške smernice.
The European Parliament is confident that the Commission and the Council will take on board the suggestions of the European Parliament,, this is necessary if it is to give its assent to the strategic guidelines.
o kohezijski politiki za podporo rasti in novim delovnim mestom: Strateške smernice Skupnosti, 2007–2013
on cohesion policy in support of growth and jobs: Community strategic guidelines, 2007-2013
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za regionalni razvoj, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. meni, da je, glede na nedavne in prihodnje širitve EU, bolj kot kadar koli prej potrebnih dovolj ekonomskih sredstev, da bi se zagotovila potrebna stopnja gospodarske in socialne kohezije za spodbujanje prave konvergence; obžaluje, da Evropski svet ni predvidel dovolj sredstev za vodenje kohezijske politike; poudarja, da so še vedno nekatere evropske regije, ki ne bodo spadale v okvir konvergenčnega cilja, čeprav so njihove težave enake kot v prejšnjih obdobjih financiranja; poziva države članice, naj skrbijo za učinkovito izvajanje vseh programov;
Considers that, given the recent and forthcoming EU enlargements, an adequate level of funding is more necessary than ever in order to ensure the necessary degree of economic and social cohesion to enhance real convergence; regrets that the European Council has failed to make available sufficient resources to pursue cohesion policy; points out that, although their problems are the same as in previous funding periods, there are still some European regions that will not be covered by the convergence objective; urges the Member States to ensure that all programmes are effectively implemented;
5. meni, da morajo kohezijske politike upoštevati pojav nasilja nad ženskami, ter uporabiti te politike za podporo zaposlitvene sposobnosti žrtev trpinčenje;
Believes that it is particularly necessary for cohesion policies to take into account the problem of gender-based violence, with these policies being used to promote the employability of victims of ill-treatment;
7. poziva Komisijo, da predstavnike držav članic, predstavnike regij, lokalnih oblasti in socilane partnerje tesneje vključi v kohezijsko politiko; meni, da so socialni partnerji ključni steber partnerstva za rast in zaposlovanje, zato tudi meni, da je krepitev vseevropska omrežja socialnih partnerjev bistvenega pomena;
Calls on the Commission to involve more actively representatives of the Member States, regions, local authorities and social partners in Cohesion Policy; considers that the social partners are an essential pillar of the partnership for growth and employment, and therefore also considers essential that trans-European social partner networks should be strengthened;
11. v zvezi s tem poudarja pomembno vlogo, ki jo imajo v evropskem gospodarstvu mikropodjetja, kot je določeno v Evropski listini o malih podjetjih, in samozaposleni; zato meni, da je treba podpirati programe za spodbujanje razvoja teh sektorjev, izboljšanje njihovih raziskovalnih, razvojnih in inovacijskih zmogljivosti, spodbujanje razvoja njihovih človeških virov in omogočanje lažjega dostopa do finančnih sredstev; meni, da bo to pripomoglo k povečanju konkurenčnosti, rasti, ustvarjanju novih delovnih mest in tako prispevalo k doseganju lizbonskih ciljev;
Points in this connection to the important role played in the European economy by micro-enterprises, as provided for in the European Charter for Small Enterprises, and the self-employed; considers it necessary, therefore, to support programmes to promote the development of these sectors, enhance their research, development, and innovation capacities, foster the development of their human resources, and afford them easier access to funding; believes that all this will serve to boost competitiveness, growth, and job creation, thus helping to attain the Lisbon objectives.
14. meni, da mora kohezijska politika ustvariti okolje, ki vodi k mobilnosti delavcev, tako da zagotovi dostop do ugodnosti socialne podpore ter nediskriminacijske upravne postopke, tako za delavce kot za njihove družine;
Takes the view that cohesion policy should create a environment conducive to the mobility of workers, by ensuring the availability of support social facilities and ensuring non discriminatory administrative procedures for both workers and their families
19. poudarja pomen sodelovanja Evropskega socialnega sklada pri celostni podpori za podeželska območja in meni, da mora podpora za podeželska območja temeljiti na postopku celovitega načrtovanja, glede na pozitivne izkušnje programa Leader, ki vključuje osebe, ki delajo na podeželskih območjih; poudarja, da je treba dati prednost oblikovanju sinergij iz vseh skladov za podeželska območja in so zato še posebej primerni koncepti decentraliziranega financiranja, kot so globalna nepovratna sredstva;
Stresses the importance of ESF participation in integrated support for rural areas, and considers that support for rural areas must be grounded in a comprehensive programming process, in the light of the positive experiences of the Leader programme involving those working in rural areas; stresses that priority must be given to the creation of synergies from all the Funds for rural areas, and that decentralised funding concepts such as the global grant are therefore particularly well suited to this purpose;
Kohezijska politika za podporo rasti in novim delovnim mestom: Strateške smernice Skupnosti, 2007–2013
Cohesion policy in support of growth and jobs: Community strategic guidelines, 2007-2013
Odbor za promet in turizem poziva Odbor za regionalni razvoj, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje predloge:
The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Vendar obžaluje, da so stopnje naložb EU v prometna omrežja, ki jih predlaga Svet za obdobje 2007 do 2013, v celoti neprimerne za doseganje izboljšanih infrastruktur in posledične konvergence, in ocenjuje, da jih je zato treba okrepiti.
Deplores the fact, however, that the levels of transport network investment by the EU proposed by the European Council for 2007 to 2013 are wholly insufficient for achieving improved infrastructures and consequent convergence; considers, therefore, that they must be increased.
4. priznava pomembnost čezmejnih projektov in transnacionalnega sodelovanja za povečanje transnacionalne integracije, interoperabilnosti in kohezije, ki jih je treba spodbuditi s finančno pomočjo, da bi se izognili železniškim linijam ali cestam, ki se končajo znotraj državnih meja, ter pomembnost čezmejnih projektov, ki prispevajo k odstranjevanju ovir, ki jih predstavljajo naravne meje (Alpe in Pireneji), so naklonjeni medmodalnemu prenosu s ceste na železnico in ponujajo rešitve problemov v zvezi s preobremenitvijo in varnostjo, še posebej, ko gre za prevoz blaga.
Recognises the importance of cross border projects and trans-national cooperation for increased transnational integration, interoperability and cohesion, which need to be encouraged by financial assistance set at incentive levels to avoid railways or routes terminating within national boundaries, and the importance of cross-border projects to help reduce obstacles at natural frontiers (the Alps and the Pyrenees), facilitate the modal shift from road to rail, and resolve congestion and safety problems, especially where the carriage of goods is concerned.