natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
i) s samodejnim prenosom funkcij posebnega predstavnika Unije v tretji državi na vodjo delegacije EU v tej državi, kot v primeru Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije;
(i) automatically attributing the functions of the Union's Special Representative to a third country to the Head of the EU Delegation in that country, as in the case of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia;
j) z izboljšanjem odnosov med 127 delegacijami in predstavništvi Evropske skupnosti na eni ter drugimi institucijami in delegacijami EU, ministrstvi za zunanje zadeve in veleposlaništvi držav članic na drugi strani prek rednih stikov in prirejanja srečanj, zagotavljanja praktične pomoči ter organiziranja vzajemnih izmenjav diplomatskega osebja držav članic in uradnikov ustreznih institucij;
(j) improving interaction between, on the one hand, the 127 EC delegations and representations and, on the other hand, other EU institutions and delegations, Member States' foreign ministries and embassies by organising regular contacts and meetings, providing practical assistance and arranging the exchange of Member States' diplomatic personnel and officials of the relevant institutions on a reciprocal basis;
10. poziva države članice EU, ki so tudi članice Varnostnega sveta ZN, da izboljšajo usklajevanje v tem okviru za večjo učinkovitost dejavnosti EU na svetovni ravni in se v bližnji prihodnosti odločijo za skupni evropski sedež;
Calls on EU Member States which are also members of the UN Security Council to improve their coordination within that framework in order to enhance the effectiveness of the action of the EU on the world stage and decide in the near future on a common European seat;
17. poziva Komisijo, naj se na teh prednostnih področjih osredotoči na politične, trgovinske, gospodarske ter finančne instrumente in ukrepe prvega stebra obstoječih pogodb, saj bo s tem bolje služila ciljem Unije v svetovnih zadevah; meni, da bi zunanjepolitičnemu delovanju EU prav tako koristilo večje število žensk na vodilnih položajih, tudi v skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki;
Calls upon the Commission to focus, within those priority areas, on the political, commercial, economic and financial instruments and policies under the first pillar of the existing treaties, in order to better serve the Union's objectives in world affairs; is of the view that the EU's external action could also benefit from more women occupying leading positions, including in the area of the CFSP;
20. ponovno opozarja, da mora spoštovanje človekovih pravic in civilnih svoboščin ostati prednostna naloga EU, medtem ko je boj proti terorizmu ključni del zunanje dejavnosti Unije; meni, da je treba še veliko storiti za krepitev mednarodnega sodelovanja v boju proti terorizmu na podlagi mednarodnega prava in Ustanovne listine ZN;
Reiterates that, while the fight against terrorism constitutes a key part of the Union's external action, respect for human rights and civil liberties must remain a priority for the EU; considers that much more should be done to strengthen international cooperation in the fight against terrorism on the basis of international law and the UN Charter;
24. želi Unijo spomniti, naj poziva svoje partnerje k nadaljnjemu razvoju in utrjevanju demokracije, človekovih pravic ter pravne države, ker so ta merila temelj uspešnega in varnega sveta;
Reminds the Union to urge its partners to pursue the development and consolidation of democracy, human rights and the rule of law, as these criteria form the basis of a prosperous and secure world;
26. meni, da si je treba s stališča zunanjepolitičnega delovanja veliko bolj prizadevati za zaustavitev širjenja revščine po svetu, boj proti stigmatizaciji in diskriminaciji ter zajezitev hujših bolezni; potrjuje pomen nadaljnje zavezanosti Unije uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja;
Is of the view that much more should be done from an external action perspective to halt the spread of poverty in the world, to fight against stigmatisation and discrimination and to combat major diseases; reiterates the importance of maintaining the Union's commitments to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals;
28. ponovno opozarja na resolucijo z dne 14. februarja 2006 o klavzuli o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v sporazumih Evropske unije ter poziva Komisijo in Svet, da upoštevata priporočila iz navedene resolucije, katere namen je zagotoviti boljšo uporabo različnih sporazumov med Unijo in številnimi partnerskimi državami, v katere so že zdaj kot bistvene prvine vključene klavzule o demokraciji; ponovno opozarja na obveznost boja proti nekaznovanju tistih, ki so krivi vojnih zločinov, zločinov proti človeštvu in drugih hudih kršitev človekovih pravic, med drugim s krepitvijo vloge Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča;
Reiterates Parliament’s above-mentioned resolution of 14 February 2006 on the human rights and democracy clause in European Union agreements, and calls on the Commission and the Council to heed the recommendations set out in that resolution, in order to better govern agreements of all kinds between the Union and the numerous partner states, where democracy clauses consistently form an essential element; reiterates its commitment to combating impunity for those guilty of war crimes, crimes against humanity and other serious human rights violations, inter alia by strengthening the role of the International Criminal Court;
33. potrjuje potrebo, glede na dejanski multilateralizem, po nadaljevanju reforme ZN v celoti, s posebnim poudarkom na preoblikovanju Varnostnega sveta; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja obetavna prizadevanja predsednika Generalne skupščine za izvedbo reforme;
Reiterates, in the light of effective multilateralism, the need to continue UN reform in its entirety, with a special focus on reforming the Security Council; welcomes in this respect the promising reform efforts initiated by the President of the General Assembly;
37. močno priporoča, da se sprejmejo ukrepi za odločen nastop pri izvajanju strategije EU - Afrika, s preseganjem tradicionalne razvojne politike in politike pomoči, upoštevajoč bližnje portugalsko predsedstvo, ki bo gostilo naslednji vrh EU-Afrika, in za pospešitev regionalnih integracijskih procesov v Latinski Ameriki s sklenitvijo pridružitvenega sporazuma med EU in Mercosurjem ter z začetkom pogajanj o podobnih sporazumih s srednjeameriškimi državami in Andsko skupnostjo;
Strongly recommends that steps be taken for decisive engagement when implementing the EU-Africa strategy beyond the traditional development and aid policies, in view of the forthcoming Portuguese Presidency which is due to host the next EU-Africa Summit, and to boost the Latin American regional integration processes by concluding the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement and commencing negotiations for similar agreements with the Central American countries and the Andean Community;
40. opozarja na svoje obširne resolucije in poročila, ki se nanašajo na različna, za Unijo pomembna zemljepisna področja, saj vsebujejo dragocene prispevke k razpravi o tem, kako bi se morala razvijati politika Unije v odnosu do teh zemljepisnih področij;
Refers to its extensive resolutions and reports concerning the different geographical areas of interest to the Union, since they contain valuable contributions to the debate on the way in which the Union's policy vis-à-vis those geographical areas should evolve;
Parlamentarni nadzor nad skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko
Parliamentary scrutiny of the Common Foreign and Security Policy
42. ugotavlja, da kljub temu, da je Svet kršil člen 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, te zadeve iz postopkovnih razlogov ni mogoče posredovati Sodišču, ker člen 21 v skladu s členom 46 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ni vključen na izčrpen seznam zadev, pri katerih določbe Pogodbe o EU glede tožb na Sodišču veljajo tudi za področje SZVP;
Notes that, despite the Council's infringement of Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, for procedural reasons it is not possible to refer the Council's practice to the Court of Justice, since Article 46 of the Treaty on European Union does not include Article 21 in the exhaustive list of cases where the EC Treaty provisions regarding actions before the Court of Justice also apply to the CFSP field;
a) odnosih med institucijami in agencijami EU:
(a) relations between EU institutions and agencies:
– z dodelitvijo pristojnosti Parlamentu, da imenuje in razreši koordinatorja za boj proti terorizmu ter direktorje SitCena, Satelitskega centra EU (EUSC) in Eurojusta;
– by conferring on Parliament the authority to appoint, and dismiss, the Counter-Terrorism Coordinator and the Directors of SitCen, the EU Satellite Centre (EUSC) and Eurojust;
– z zagotavljanjem, da koordinator za boj proti terorizmu ter direktorji SitCena, EUSC in Eurojusta predložijo Parlamentu letno poročilo o dejavnostih in proračunu svojih uradov, ter z zagotavljanjem, da se ustrezno upoštevajo vsa morebitna poznejša priporočila in pripombe Parlamenta;
– by ensuring that the Counter-Terrorism Coordinator and the Directors of SitCen, the EUSC and Eurojust submit an annual report to Parliament on their activities and budget and by ensuring that any subsequent recommendations and remarks from Parliament are duly taken into account;
b) odnosih med državami članicami ter institucijami in agencijami EU:
(b) relations between Member States and EU institutions and agencies:
– z razvojem sodelovanja med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti, da se zagotovi demokratičen nadzor nad obveščevalnimi agencijami in organi EU ter preglednost nad dejavnostmi varnostnih in obveščevalnih služb na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni za državljane Evropske unije, da bodo lahko zaupali vanje;
– by developing cooperation between the European Parliament and national parliaments so as to provide democratic scrutiny of EU intelligence agencies and organs as well as transparency and reassurance for the citizens of the European Union concerning the activities of both EU and national security and intelligence services;
– z dodelitvijo dejanskih pristojnosti pisarni koordinatorja za boj proti terorizmu prek okrepitve pristojnosti in pooblastil koordinatorja;
– by conferring real powers on the office of the Counter-Terrorism Coordinator by strengthening the Coordinator’s remit and mandate;
c) odnosih med EU in tretjimi državami:
(c) relations between the EU and third countries:
– z uvedbo izmenjave informacij in najboljših praks med posebnim odborom Parlamenta in odbori, pristojnimi za obveščevalne dejavnosti v kongresu ZDA;
– by engaging in an exchange of information and best practices between Parliament's Special Committee and the US Congress Committees on Intelligence,
– s tem, da se od tretjih držav in še posebej držav pristopnic ali pridruženih držav zahteva, da prek svojih parlamentov ali vlad z enakovrednimi telesi iz EU izmenjujejo občutljive podatke ali obveščevalno gradivo, ki zadeva SZVP;
– by requesting third countries, and in particular acceding or associated countries, to share available sensitive information or intelligence material regarding the CFSP with their EU counterparts via their respective parliaments or governments;
Financiranje SZVP/EVOP
The financing of the CFSP/ESDP
52. ponovno izraža obžalovanje, da so bila letna poročila Sveta doslej v bistvu omejena na opis dejavnosti SZVP, kot v preambulah navaja celo sam Svet, četudi člen 28 Pogodbe o EU predvideva posvetovanje o glavnih vidikih in temeljnih usmeritvah SZVP, vključno z njenimi finančnimi posledicami, ter upoštevanje stališč Parlamenta;
Reiterates its disappointment that the Council's annual reports have hitherto been limited in essence to a description of CFSP activities, as stated even by the Council itself in the preambles thereto, despite the fact that Article 28 of the EU Treaty provides for consultation on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP, including its financial implications, and for Parliament's views to be taken into consideration;
54. opozarja pred omejevalno razlago člena 43 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, ki bi lahko privedla do tega, da Parlament ne bil imel pravice, da se z njim na začetku vsakega leta opravi posvetovanje v zvezi z glavnimi vidiki in temeljnimi usmeritvami v tem letu v skladu s členom 21 Pogodbe o EU;
Cautions against any restrictive interpretation of Point 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement which could lead to a situation whereby Parliament's right to genuine consultation, at the beginning of each year, on the main aspects and basic choices to be made for that year in accordance with Article 21 of the EU Treaty is circumvented;
56. obžaluje prejšnji odnos Sveta, saj je pomembne finančne informacije zagotavljal šele po tem, ko so bile že sprejete končne odločitve, in je s tem izničil sam namen te naloge; kljub temu pozdravlja določen napredek na tem področju, zlasti v povezavi z novo misijo na Kosovu, in pričakuje, da bo to v prihodnje redna praksa;
Regrets the Council's previous attitude of only providing substantial financial information once the final decisions have already been taken, thus defeating the very purpose of the exercise; welcomes, however, the fact that there has been some improvement in this regard, notably in connection with the new Kosovo mission, and expects this to continue on a regular basis;
58. obžaluje, glede na že nezadosten znesek, dodeljen SZVP v obdobju 2007–2013 , da posebni člen v proračunskem poglavju o SZVP, ki je namenjen posebnim predstavnikom Evropske unije, ne preprečuje, da bi se povečalo število teh poslanikov, ki se načeloma imenujejo zgolj za posebne primere in ne smejo slabiti vloge delegacij Komisije na kraju samem;
Regrets, given the already insufficient amount allocated to the CFSP for the period 2007-2013, that the specific article within the CFSP budget chapter devoted to European Union Special Representatives does not avoid the proliferation of envoys of that kind, who by definition should be nominated only in respect of special cases and should not weaken the role of the Commission's delegations on the ground;
61. obžaluje, da v novem medinstitucionalnem sporazumu ni izrecno predvideno financiranje skupnih stroškov vojaških operacij v okviru EVOP iz proračuna Skupnosti, zaradi česar bo prekinjena sedanja praksa poseganja po dopolnilnih proračunskih ali zagonskih sredstvih držav članic;
Regrets that the new Interinstitutional Agreement does not explicitly provide for the joint costs of military operations within the framework of the ESDP, to be financed from the Community budget, thereby discontinuing the existing practice of having recourse to Member States' subsidiary budgets or start-up funds;
64. prosi Svet, naj obvesti Parlament o novih določbah v zvezi z medvladnim „mehanizmom Athena“, ki so jih ministri sprejeli decembra 2006; je presenečen, da se Svetu ni zdelo primerno o tej zadevi obvestiti Parlament na dveh skupnih srečanjih jeseni 2006, glede na to, da je razprava o tej točki potekala prej v tem letu;
Asks the Council to update Parliament on the new provisions concerning the "ATHENA mechanism" adopted by Ministers in December 2006; is surprised that the Council did not see fit to inform Parliament on this matter in the course of the two joint meetings held in the autumn of 2006, given the fact that this item had been discussed earlier in the year;
a) v začetni fazi bi Svet pripravil proračunski dokument, iz katerega bi bile razvidne zaveze držav članic za izpolnitev civilnega globalnega cilja 2008 in vojaškega globalnega cilja 2010;
(a) in an initial phase, the Council drawing up a budgetary document reflecting the commitments made by the Member States to fulfil the Civilian Headline Goal 2008 and the Military Headline Goal 2010;
b) v drugi fazi bi se morale države članice zavezati k EVOP prek okvirnega „proračuna“, o katerem bi Evropski Parlament in parlamenti držav članic letno skupaj razpravljali, v katerem bi na večletni osnovi zagotovili sredstva za financiranje opreme in osebja, potrebnega za operacije EVOP, s čemer bi države članice pokazale pripravljenost, da porabijo sredstva za EVOP in da zagotovijo večjo preglednosti pri porabi za vojaške namene;
(b) in a second phase, the Member States committing themselves to the ESDP through an indicative "budget", to be jointly debated by the European Parliament and the parliaments of Member States on an annual basis, in which they would commit funds on a multi-annual basis to finance the equipment and personnel needed for ESDP operations, thus indicating the Member States' readiness to spend on the ESDP and ensuring greater transparency as regards military spending;
c) in končno s sprejemanjem skupnih sklepov o racionalizaciji proračuna za SZVP in EVOP, vključno z računovodstvom za nacionalne odhodke na ravni EU na področjih varnosti in obrambe, v okviru prenovljenega finančnega sistema EU, predvidenega za 2008-2009;
(c) finally, by reaching joint decisions on the rationalisation of the budget for the CFSP and the ESDP, including the accounting of national expenditure at EU level in the security and defence dimension, within the framework of the revised financial system of the Union envisaged for 2008-2009;
Odbor za proračun poziva Odbor za zunanje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. ponovno izraža svoje obžalovanje, da so bila letna poročila Sveta doslej v bistvu omejena na opis dejavnosti SZVP, kot v preambulah navaja celo sam Svet, četudi člen 28 Pogodbe o EU predvideva posvetovanje o glavnih vidikih in temeljnih usmeritvah SZVP, vključno z njenimi finančnimi posledicami, ter upoštevanje stališč Parlamenta;
Reiterates its disappointment that the Council's annual reports have so far been essentially limited to a description of CFSP activities, as even stated by the Council itself in the preambles, although Article 28 of the EU Treaty provides for a consultation on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP, including its financial implications, and taking into consideration Parliament's views;
5. obžaluje prejšnji odnos Sveta, saj je pomembne finančne informacije zagotavljal šele po tem, ko so bile že sprejete končne odločitve, in je s tem izničil sam namen te naloge; kljub temu pozdravlja določen napredek na tem področju, zlasti v povezavi z novo misijo na Kosovu, in pričakuje, da bo to v prihodnje redna praksa;
Regrets the Council's previous attitude of only providing substantial financial information once the final decisions have already been taken, thus defeating the very purpose of the exercise; welcomes however some improvement in this regard, notably in connection with the new Kosovo mission, and expects this to continue on a regular basis;
7. izraža posebno zaskrbljenost, da doslej noben parlament pravzaprav ni imel možnosti, da bi ocenil mešane ukrepe SZVP, ki so imeli za posledico odhodke, katere so povzročili tako civilni ukrepi kot ukrepi vojaške ali obrambne narave; poudarja, da je to posledica razdrobljenih razmer, v katerih imajo nacionalni parlamenti vpogled v vojaški/obrambni del financiranja, Evropski parlament pa ima vpogled izključno v civilne vidike; poudarja, da bi moral biti omogočen nadzor celotnega obsega teh kombiniranih civilnih in vojaških ukrepov ter zato poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj v polni meri sodelujeta pri iskanju načinov, kako ustvariti celovito sliko teh misij in njihovih mnogovrstnih struktur financiranja;
Expresses particular worry that mixed CFSP actions, entailing expenditure resulting from both civilian actions and actions with military or defence implications, have so far been almost impossible to assess by any parliament; points out that this results from the fragmented situation in which, on the one hand, national parliaments have insight into the military/defence part of the financing and, on the other, the European Parliament has insight into solely the civilian aspects; underlines that these combined civilian and military actions should be able to be scrutinised as to their full scope and therefore calls on the Council and the Commission to cooperate fully in finding ways to obtain an overall picture of these missions and their multiple financing structure;
10. prosi Svet, naj obvesti Parlament o novih določbah v zvezi z medvladnim „mehanizmom Athena“, ki so jih ministri sprejeli decembra 2006; je presenečen, da se Svetu ni zdelo primerno o tej zadevi obvestiti Parlament na dveh skupnih srečanjih jeseni 2006, glede na to, da je razprava o tej točki potekala prej v tem letu;
Asks the Council to update the Parliament on the new provisions concerning the "Athena mechanism" adopted by Ministers in December 2006; is surprised that the Council did not see fit to inform the Parliament on this matter in the course of the two joint meetings held in the autumn of 2006 given the fact that this item had been discussed earlier in the year;
Letno poročilo 2005 o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki
Annual report 2005 on CFSP
Nadomeščeni/-a pripravljavec/-ka mnenja
Previous drafts(wo)man/men
Letno poročilo Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in temeljnih usmeritvah SZVP, vključno s finančnimi posledicami za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (točka H, odstavek 40 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999) – 2005
Annual report from the Council to the EP on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the EC (point H, paragraph 40, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999) - 2005
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega potniškega prevoza ter o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 in 1107/70
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (13736/1/2006 – C6‑0042/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (13736/1/2006 – C6‑0042/2007 ),
UL C 140 E, 13.06.02, str.
OJ C 140 E, 13.6.2002, p.
282. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2000)0007 )
282. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2000)0007 )
UL C 365 E, 19.12.00, str.
OJ C 365 E, 19.12.2000, p.
– ob upoštevanju prvega spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2002)0107 )
– having regard to the first amended Commission proposal ( COM(2002)0107 )
UL C 151 E, 25.06.02, str.
OJ C 151 E, 25.6.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju drugega spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0319 )
– having regard to the second amended Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0319 )
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0131/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0131/2007 ),
(10) V nasprotju z Uredbo (EGS) št. 1191/69, katere področje uporabe vključuje tudi storitve javnega potniškega prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh, se smatra, da ni primerno, da se v tej uredbi uredi sklepanje pogodb o izvajanju javne službe v tem specifičnem sektorju.
(10) Contrary to Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, the scope of which extends to public passenger transport services by inland waterway, it is not considered advisable for this Regulation to cover the award of public service contracts in that specific sector.
Za organizacijo storitev javnega potniškega prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh torej veljajo splošna načela Pogodbe, razen če se države članice odločijo, da bodo v tem specifičnem sektorju uporabljale to uredbo.
The organisation of public passenger transport services by inland waterway is therefore subject to compliance with the general principles of the Treaty, unless Member States choose to apply this Regulation to that specific sector .
Določbe te uredbe ne preprečujejo vključitve celinskih plovnih poti v širše mestno, predmestno ali regionalno omrežje javnega potniškega prevoza.
The provisions of this Regulation do not prevent the integration of inland waterway services into a wider urban, suburban or regional public passenger transport network.