natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zato se zdi tretji odstavek člena 159 pogodbe o ES najustreznejša pravna podlaga za zadevno vprašanje: ta določba namreč jasno govori, „ da so [lahko] potrebne posebne dejavnosti zunaj skladov, in ne da bi posegali v ukrepe, sprejete v okviru drugih politik Skupnosti.
As a result, the third paragraph of Article 159 of the EC Treaty proves the most appropriate legal basis for the proposal in question: indeed, that provision clearly refers to " specific actions [which] prove necessary outside the Funds and without prejudice to the measures decided upon within the framework of the other Community policies ".
“ Še več, na podlagi člena 159(3) je mogoče v zadevnem procesu sprejemanja odločitev uporabiti postopek soodločanja in tako Evropskemu parlamentu dodeliti pomembnejšo vlogo.
What is more, Article 159(3) makes the codecision procedure applicable to the relevant decision-making process, thus assigning a stronger role to the European Parliament.
Po drugi strani se zdi, da na takšen sklep - in sicer na možnost uporabe člena 159(3) - napeljuje že samo besedilo obravnavanega predloga: drugi odstavek člena 2 govori, da je namen Mednarodnega sklada za Irsko, „ da bo dopolnjeval dejavnosti, ki se financirajo iz strukturnih skladov Skupnosti, zlasti dejavnosti programa PEACE, “ pri čemer to dopolnjevanje jasno izraža isti cilj obeh pobud.
On the other hand, this conclusion - namely the applicability of Article 159(3) - seems to be suggested by the very wording of the proposal under consideration: the second paragraph of Article 2 refers to the mission of the IFI as "to complement the activities financed by the Structural Funds, and especially those of the PEACE programme" , where this complementarity clearly evokes the same aim for both initiatives.
Z drugimi besedami, glede na to, da imata program PEACE in prispevek za Mednarodni sklad za Irsko iste cilje, bi morala imeti enako pravno podlago.
In other terms, given that they have the same objectives, both the PEACE programme and the contribution to the IFI should have the same legal basis.
Poleg tega je iz uvodne izjave 9 („ Pomembno je zagotoviti ustrezno usklajevanje med dejavnostmi sklada in dejavnostmi, ki se financirajo v okviru strukturnih skladov Skupnosti v skladu s členom 159 pogodbe, zlasti programa PEACE. “) razvidno, da je imela Komisija verjetno v mislih člen 159, čeprav je za pravno podlago predloga izbrala člen 308.
In addition, recital 9 ("It is vital to ensure proper co-ordination between the activities of the Fund and those financed under the Community Structural Funds provided for by Article 159 of the Treaty, in particular the PEACE programme" ) shows that, notwithstanding the choice of Article 308 as the legal basis for the proposal, the Commission probably had had Article 159 at the back of its mind.
Zaradi uporabnosti člena 159 pogodbe o ES kot najbolj podrobne in ustrezne pravne podlage, člen 308 ni več primeren.
Owing to the applicability of Article 159 of the EC Treaty as the most specific and appropriate legal basis, Article 308 is no longer relevant.
Kot je bilo videti, je člen 308 mogoče uporabiti le, ko je to potrebno „ med delovanjem skupnega trga ,“ kar očitno ne velja ­- vsaj ne neposredno - v primeru, ko je cilj spodbujanje miru in sprave med skupnostmi.
As has been seen, Article 308 is applicable only when it is necessary "in the course of the operation of the common market" , which is obviously not the case - at least not directly - when aiming at the promotion of inter-community peace and reconciliation.
Ta določba nadalje, poleg soglasja v Svetu, predpisuje le posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom.
What is more, that provision provides only consultation of the European Parliament, along with a unanimous vote in the Council.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je na svoji seji 20. novembra 2006, po nastopu pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta in predstavnika Evropske komisije, preučil to vprašanje in se soglasno odločil, da bi bilo treba tretji odstavek člena 159 pogodbe o ES obravnavati kot edino zakonito pravno podlago za navedeni predlog
At its meeting of 20 November 2006, after hearing the Legal Service of the European Parliament and the representative of the European Commission, the Committee on Legal Affairs examined this question and decided unanimously that the third paragraph of Article 159 of the EC Treaty should be regarded as the only lawful legal basis for the abovementioned proposal
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili prisotni: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Maria Berger, Carlo Casini, Rosa Díez González, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Manuel Medina Ortega, Gabriele Stauner, Jaroslav Zvěřina. .
The following were present for the final vote: Giuseppe Gargani (chairman), Maria Berger, Carlo Casini, Rosa Díez González, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Manuel Medina Ortega, Gabriele Stauner, Jaroslav Zvěřina .
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o finančnih prispevkih Skupnosti v Mednarodni sklad za Irsko (2007–2010)
on the proposal for a Council regulation concerning Community financial contributions to the International Fund for Ireland (2007-2010)
Ključni elementi predloga Komisije
elements of the Commission proposal
Mednarodni sklad za Irsko je bil ustanovljen leta 1986, da bi prispeval k izvajanju člena 10(a) anglo-irskega sporazuma z dne 15. novembra 1985.
The International Fund for Ireland (IFI) was established in 1986 in order to contribute to the implementation of Article 10(a) of the Anglo-Irish Agreement of 15 November 1985.
Cilji tega sklada so " pospeševanje gospodarskega in socialnega napredka ter spodbujanje stikov, dialoga in sprave med nacionalisti in unionisti na celotnem ozemlju Irske ".
The objectives of the IFI are " to promote economic and social advance and to encourage contact, dialogue and reconciliation between nationalists and unionists throughout Ireland ".
Evropska unija je začela v mednarodni sklad za Irsko prispevati leta 1989.
The European Union started to contribute to the IFI in 1989.
Prispevanje ES v sklad zdaj predstavlja 48 % letnih prispevkov v sklad.
EC funding now represents 48% of annual contributions to the Fund.
V obdobju 2005 do 2006 je bilo iz proračuna Skupnosti v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) 177/2005 z dne 24. januarja 2005 o finančnih prispevkih Skupnosti v Mednarodni sklad za Irsko vsako leto dodeljenih 15 milijonov EUR.
For the period 2005 to 2006, EUR 15 million were committed from the Community budget for each of the years 2006 and 2006 in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) Nr. 177/2005 of 24 January 2005 on Community financial contributions to the International Fund for Ireland.
Ta uredba bo prenehala veljati 31. decembra 2006.
The Regulation will expire on 31 December 2006.
Mednarodni sklad za Irsko dopolnjuje ukrep, ki ga izvajajo programi EU za mir in spravo na Severnem Irskem in v mejni regiji Irske (PEACE I 1995–1999, PEACE II 2000–2006 in PEACE III 2007–2013).
The IFI complements the action carried out by the EU Programmes for Peace and Reconciliation in Northern Ireland and the Border Region of Ireland (PEACE I 1995-1999, PEACE II 2000-2006 and PEACE III 2007-2013).
Za to zadnjo fazo dejavnosti sklada je Komisija sprejela predlog uredbe, v katerem predlaga, da EU nadaljuje s svojimi prispevki v mednarodni sklad za Irsko v znesku 15 milijonov EUR letno še v obdobju prihodnjih štirih let, ter da se to obdobje zaključi leta 2010.
For this final period of activities of the Fund the Commission has now adopted a Proposal for a Regulation suggesting that EU contributions of €15 million per year to the International Fund for Ireland continue for a further period of 4 years, ending in 2010.
V predlogu proračuna za leto 2007 je Svet rezerviral 15 milijonov EUR za mednarodni sklad za Irsko.
In the DB 2007 the Council has put 15 million in the reserve for the IFI.
Predlogi sprememb, ki jih predlaga poročevalec
Amendments proposed by the rapporteur:
*Namen predloga spremembe 2 je spremeniti pravno podlago: predlog temelji na členu 308 Pogodbe o ES (gre za splošni člen, ki se uporablja, kadar ni druge pravne podlage - posvetovanje).
* The aim of Amendment 2 is to change the legal basis: The proposal is based on Article 308 of the EC Treaty (which is a general article that is used if there is no other legal basis - consultation).
Obstajajo pa resni dvomi: cilj mednarodnega sklada za Irsko je"spodbujanju gospodarskega in socialnega razvoja".
However, there are serious doubts: the IFI aims at "promoting economic and social advance".
Zato bi bil člen 159 (kohezija) ustreznejša pravna podlaga.
Article 159 (cohesion), could therefore be a more adequate legal basis.
To je pomembno, saj člen 159 predvideva postopek soodločanja.
This is relevant as Article 159 provides for a codecision procedure.
* Namen predlogov sprememb 3-5 je zagotoviti, da je proračunski organ stalno obveščen o dejanskih rezultatih in izvajanju dejavnosti, financiranih v okviru te uredbe.
* Amendments 3-5 make sure that the Budgetary Authority is kept informed of the actual results and the implementation of the activities funded under this Regulation.
Meni, da mora biti finančni okvir, naveden v zakonodajnem predlogu, združljiv z zgornjo mejo razdelka 1b novega večletnega finančnega okvirja in poudarja, da se letni znesek določi v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka v skladu z določbami točke 37 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006;
Considers that the financial envelope indicated in the legislative proposal must be compatible with the ceiling of heading 1b of the new multiannual financial framework (MFF) and points out that the annual amount will be decided within the annual budgetary procedure in accordance with the provisions of point 37 of the IIA of 17 May 2006;
Komisija vsako leto do 31. marca predloži proračunskemu organu poročilo z oceno dejavnosti sklada, ki upošteva razvoj dogodkov v mirovnem procesom na Severnem Irskem.
By 31 March every year, the Commission shall submit a report to the Budgetary Authority, assessing the results of the activities of the Fund, taking into account developments in the peace process in Northern Ireland .
To poročilo med drugim vključuje naslednje:
That report shall incorporate, inter alia, the following:
(a) pregled dejavnosti sklada;
(a) a survey of the Fund's activities;
(b) seznam projektov, ki so prejeli pomoč;
(b) a list of projects which have received aid;
(c) oceno narave in vpliva dejavnosti sklada, zlasti glede na njegove cilje in na merila iz členov 2 in 8;
(c) an assessment of the nature and impact of the Fund’s activities, notably in relation to its objectives and the criteria laid down in Articles 2 and 8;
(d) oceno ukrepov, ki jih je sklad sprejel z namenom zagotoviti sodelovanje in usklajenost z intervencijami strukturnih skladov, zlasti ob upoštevanju obveznosti iz členov3 in 4;
(d) an assessment of action taken by the Fund to ensure cooperation and coordination with Structural Funds interventions, taking account, in particular, of obligations under Articles 3 and 4;
(e) prilogo, v kateri so predstavljeni rezultati preverjanja in nadzora, ki ju Komisija izvaja v skladu z izjavo o obvezi iz člena 7.
(e) an annex setting out the results of the verifications and controls carried out by the Commission pursuant to the undertaking referred to in Article 7.
Ker je obveznost poročanja Komisije za proračunski organ bistvenega pomena, je treba ta člen obnoviti.
As the Commission´s reporting obligations are vital for the Budgetary Authority, this article has to be reinstated.
Člen 6, odstavek 1, uvodni stavek
Article 6, paragraph 1, introductory phrase
Sklad najpozneje do 30. junija 2008 predloži Komisiji strategijo o zaključku dejavnosti sklada, ki vključuje:
By 30 June 2008 at the latest, the Fund shall submit to the Commission its strategy for the closure of the activities of the Fund, including:
Sklad najpozneje do 30. junija 2008 predloži Komisiji in proračunskemu organu strategijo o zaključku dejavnosti sklada, ki vključuje:
By 30 June 2008 at the latest, the Fund shall submit to the Commission and the Budgetary Authority its strategy for the closure of the activities of the Fund, including:
Proračunski organ mora biti obveščen o izvajanju sklada in o strategiji njegove ukinitve.
The Budgetary Authority must be kept informed about the implementation and the strategy for the closure of the Fund.
Končno poročilo je treba Komisiji predložiti šest mesecev pred datumom zaključka, predvidenem v strategiji o zaključku dejavnosti iz točke (a) prvega odstavka člena 6, ali šest mesecev po zadnjem plačilu Skupnosti, kar od tega se zgodi prej, in mora vključevati vse potrebne informacije, ki bi Komisiji omogočile, da oceni izvajanje pomoči in uresničevanje ciljev.
A final report should be submitted to the Commission six months before the winding up date foreseen in the strategy for closure referred in point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 6 or six months after the last Community payment, whichever happens first, and should include all the necessary information that would enable the Commission to evaluate the implementation of the assistance and the attainment of the objectives.
Končno poročilo se predloži Komisiji in proračunskemu organu šest mesecev pred datumom zaključka, predvidenem v strategiji o zaključku dejavnosti iz točke (a) prvega odstavka člena 6, ali šest mesecev po zadnjem plačilu Skupnosti, kar od tega se zgodi prej, in vključuje vse potrebne informacije, ki bi Komisiji omogočile, da oceni izvajanje pomoči in uresničevanje ciljev.
A final report shall be submitted to the Commission and the Budgetary Authority six months before the winding up date foreseen in the strategy for closure referred in point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 6 or six months after the last Community payment, whichever happens first, and shall include all the necessary information that would enable the Commission to evaluate the implementation of the assistance and the attainment of the objectives.
Predlog uredbe Sveta o finančnih prispevkih Skupnosti v Mednarodni sklad za Irsko (2007–2010)
Proposal for a Council regulation concerning Community financial contributions to the International Fund for Ireland (2007-2010)
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o finančnih prispevkih Skupnosti v Mednarodni sklad za Irsko (2007-2010)
Proposal for a Council regulation concerning Community financial contributions to the International Fund for Ireland (2007-2010)
BUDG 29.11.2006
JURI 29.11.2006
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja priporočila Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zaščiti mladoletnikov in človeškega dostojanstva ter o pravici do ugovora v zvezi z konkurenčnostjo evropske avdiovizualne industrije in industrije spletnih informacijskih storitev
on the Council common position for adopting a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on protection of minors and human dignity and the right of reply in relation to the competitiveness of the European audiovisual and online information services industry
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (9577/1/2006 – C6‑0313/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (95771/2006 – C6‑0313/2006 ),
UL C 193 E, 17.8.2006, str.
OJ C 193 E, 17.8.2006, p.
217. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0341 )
217. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0341 )
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2006)0031 )
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0031 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6‑0433/2006 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0433/2006 ),
Poročilo v drugi obravnavi
Report on second reading
V osnutku so predlagani nekateri podrobni ukrepi, ki bi jih lahko sprejele države članice in industrija spletnih avdiovizualnih storitev, da se zagotovi boljša zaščita mladoletnikov in človeškega dostojanstva.
It sets out a number of detailed measures which could be taken by the Member States and online audiovisual service industries to ensure better protection for minors and for human dignity, together with measures to guarantee a right of reply on the online media.
Predlagani so tudi ukrepi za zagotovitev pravice do ugovora v spletnih medijih.
Numerous negotiations have been conducted with the Council and Commission in an effort to secure a right of reply.
Zagotovitev pravice do ugovora je tema mnogih pogajanj s Svetom in Evropsko komisijo, zato je skupno stališče na to temo korak naprej, saj doslej ta pravica na področju spletnih medijev ni bila zagotovljena na evropski ravni.
The proposal for a common position could be considered as a step forward since, to date, the right of reply has not been recognised at European level by the online media.
Internet je postal najbolj cenjeno sredstvo komunikacije, zlasti za mlade, ki lahko do njega dostopajo v šoli, v internetnih kavarnah in prek prenosnih telefonov tretje generacije.
Internet has become the most popular means of communication, particularly among young people able to access it at school, in cybercafés and on third-generation mobile telephones.
Zato mora Evropska unija nujno predlagati ukrepe na evropski ravni, da bo zagotovljena osnovna zaščita najbolj ranljivih in mladoletnih oseb, ki so vedno pogosteje izpostavljene škodljivim (nasilnim ali pornografskim) podobam.
It is therefore a matter of urgency for the European Union to propose a comprehensive set of measures at European level seeking to provide at least a minimum degree of protection for the most vulnerable and for minors, who are more and more frequently exposed to harmful (violent or pornographic) images.
Skupno stališče je zadovoljivo, saj zajema glavne predloge, ki jih skupaj zagovarjajo vse politične skupine.
The common position is satisfactory insofar as it takes on board the principal concerns expressed by the political groups as a whole:
Boljše obveščanje in boljše izobraževanje : Osnutek priporočila državam članicam priporoča, naj organizirajo informacijske kampanje za osveščanje državljanov o morebitnih nevarnostih interneta, razdeljevanje informacijskih zloženk o tem, kako varno „deskati“ po internetu, kako se zaščititi s pomočjo sistemov filtriranja in kako se pritožiti ali prijaviti škodljive vsebine prek odprtega telefona, ki bo odslej na voljo v vseh državah članicah.
Better information and guidance : The proposal for a recommendation advises Member States to launch information campaigns to increase public awareness of the potential dangers of Internet and distribute information packs containing tips on 'safe surfing', protective filter systems and the use of hotlines to be introduced in each Member State for registering complaints or reporting harmful content.
Zagotavljati bodo morale tudi trajno izobraževanje učiteljev in mentorjev o uporabi interneta in obstoječih nevarnostih v klepetalnicah in forumih.
They should also provide ongoing training for teachers and educators concerning the use of Internet and the dangers of online discussion groups such as forums and chatlines.
S pomočjo teh podatkov bodo lahko internetni uporabniki (starši, učitelji, mladoletniki itd.) vedeli, katere vsebine ter storitve so kakovostne in varne.
The information thus provided should enable Internet users (parents, teachers, minors, etc.) to determine the content and services which are totally safe to access.
Boljše sprejemanje odgovornosti : V osnutku je poudarjen tudi pomen spodbujanja odgovornega odnosa strokovnjakov, da naj storijo vse možno za preprečevanje diskriminacije, nedovoljenih ali škodljivih vsebin in nanje opozorijo ter za oblikovanje oznake kakovosti ponudnikov storitev.
A more responsible approach : The text also stresses the need to instil a greater sense of responsibility into those working in this sector, who should do everything possible to avoid any form of discrimination, prevent the circulation of illegal or harmful content, ensuring that it can be reported where it occurs and introduce a quality label for service providers.
Zato naj sprejmejo ukrepe, na podlagi katerih bo omogočen dostop do interneta, hkrati pa onemogočen dostop do škodljivih vsebin, zlasti s pomočjo sistema filtriranja ali skupnih opisnih simbolov oziroma opozoril (primeri vseh teh ukrepov so podrobno navedeni v prilogah k priporočilu).
For this purpose, they are called upon to facilitate Internet access while avoiding harmful content, for example by means of filters, common designations and warning banners (all these measures being detailed by way of example in the two annexes to the recommendation).
Pravica do ugovora v spletnih medijih:
Right of reply in the online media : Finally, the proposal for a recommendation seeks to facilitate exercise of a right of reply in all online media.
Namen osnutka priporočila je tudi zagotoviti uporabo pravice do ugovora v vseh spletnih medijih.
This already works satisfactorily in the written press and audiovisual services in all the Member States.
Ta pravica že uspešno deluje v pisnih medijih in avdiovizualnih storitvah v vseh državah članicah, zato je treba uvesti tudi osnovna evropska načela o uporabi pravice do ugovora na področju vseh novih elektronskih sredstev komunikacije (interneta, prenosnih telefonov).
Minimum guidelines should therefore be established at European level concerning exercise of the right of reply in respect of all new electronic communications media (Internet, mobile phones).
Osnutek priporočila bo omogočil zagotovitev pravice do ugovora, ki bo prilagojena tehnološkemu razvoju.
This proposal seeks to ensure a right of reply adapted to technological progress.
Spremljanje ukrepov, ki ga opravlja Komisija : Osnutek priporočila omogoča Komisiji, da preuči možnost za uvedbo evropskega zelenega telefona, da bodo državljani bolje obveščeni o načinih pritožbe ali sistemih filtriranja, in za uvedbo imena domene, na primer KID.eu.
Monitoring by the Commission : The Commission proposal also envisages the possibility of introducing a European freephone number providing the public with better information regarding complaint procedures or filter systems and the possible establishment of a domain name such as KID.eu.
Razveseljivo je, da namerava Komisija predložiti poročilo o izvajanju in učinkovitosti ukrepov iz tega priporočila in ga po potrebi ponovno pregledati.
It is also gratifying to learn that the Commission intends to submit a report on the implementation and effectiveness of the measures provided for in this recommendation and to re-examine it if necessary.
Priporočilo mora zagotoviti, da internet še naprej ostane privlačno in postane varnejše sredstvo komunikacije za najmlajše in najbolj ranljive osebe.
This recommendation should ensure that Internet remains an attractive means of communication which is, at the same time, safer for the younger and more vulnerable members of society.
V nenehno spreminjajoči se tehnologiji in v popolnoma odprtem komunikacijskem prostoru je treba zaščititi temeljne svoboščine uporabnikov, zlasti mladoletnikov, ter zelo pogosto posodabljati in ocenjevati ukrepe in standarde.
In a world of constantly developing technology and a completely open communications landscape, it is necessary to protect the fundamental freedoms of users, in particular minors, by ensuring that the relevant measures and standards are constantly updated, implemented on a mutual basis and very regularly evaluated.
Na podlagi tega bodo imeli državljani Unije zaupanje v uporabo nove tehnologije, ki se bo nenehno razvijala v skladu z zakonskimi predpisi.
This is the condition which must be met if the people of the European Union are to feel safe using these new technologies and, is therefore necessary for their regulated and ongoing development.
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja priporočila Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zaščiti mladoletnikov in človeškega dostojanstva ter o pravici do ugovora v zvezi z konkurenčnostjo evropske avdiovizualne industrije in industrije spletnih informacijskih storitev
Council common position for adopting a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on protection of minors and human dignity and the right of reply in relation to the competitiveness of the European audiovisual and online information services industry