natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ta stopnja povečanja pa ne sme preseči stopnje rasti BNP Skupnosti za zadevno leto."
This rate of increase may not, however, exceed the rate of growth of Community GNP for the year concerned.”
Tudi če sporazum o novi finančni perspektivi ni dosežen, Komisija lahko sprejme letno politično strategijo, saj je namen slednje določiti glavne prednostne naloge za naslednje leto in oceniti potrebna sredstva za izvrševanje teh nalog.
In absence of agreement on a new Financial Perspective, the Commission can adopt the APS as it aims to establish the main priorities for the coming year and estimates the resources required to implement them.
Vendar je položaj v zvezi s PPP drugačen, saj slednji narekuje odločitve glede zneskov.
The situation is different, however, as far as the PDB is concerned because it implies decisions on figures.
Poročevalec želi poudariti, da je treba preučiti različne možnosti v primeru, da sporazum ne bo sklenjen aprila/maja, saj letni in večletni postopek potekata vzporedno.
The Rapporteur wishes to underline that as the annual and multiannual procedures are being conducted in parallel, different options should be examined, in case of non agreement in April/May.
V tem primeru sta na voljo dve možnosti:
There are two possibilities open in current circumstances:
a) Komisija mora pripraviti PPP na podlagi obstoječih zgornjih meja (Finančna perspektiva 2000-2006) in uporabiti mehanizem, predviden v členu 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma
a) The Commission should prepare the PDB on the basis of the existing ceilings (FP 2000-2006) applying the mechanism foreseen in article 26 of the IIA
Če se sporazum sklene kasneje v letu, mora Komisija, ko je sporazum dosežen, predložiti pisni predlog spremembe za prilagoditev zgornjih meja. ,
In case of an agreement later in the year the Commission should present an Amending Letter once the agreement is achieved to adjust the ceilings.
Točka 26 s političnega vidika ni za Evropski parlament ne izvedljiva ne sprejemljiva, kot je navedel poročevalec za Finančno perspektivo, Reimer Böge, v delovnem dokumentu št. 1
From a political point of view, article 26 is neither workable nor acceptable to the European Parliament, as referred to by the Rapporteur on the Financial Perspective, Mr Reimer Böge, in his working document n° 1
a) uporaba tega samodejnega mehanizma sčasoma vodi do zmanjšanja obveznih izdatkov,
a) the use of this automatic mechanism over the years leads to a reduction of the NCE,
b) struktura sedanje Finančne perspektive ni primerna za podčrtanje prednostnih nalog, ki jih je opredelila Komisija in pri katerih sodeluje Parlament (Lizbonska strategija),
b) the structure of the current FP is not adequate to highlight the priorities identified by the Commission and shared by the Parliament (i.e. Lisbon strategy),
c) EP ne more uporabiti sredstev iz razdelka 7 (predpristop),
c) the EP cannot use the appropriations of heading 7 (pre-accession),
d) izhodišče za podaljšanje – Finančna perspektiva za leto 2006, temelji na EU-25, medtem ko bo Finančna perspektiva za obdobje po letu 2007 krila EU-27.
d) the starting point for the prolongation - FP for the year 2006 - is based on EU-25 while the FP for 2007 onwards will be for EU-27.
Poročevalec priznava, da je Parlament v občutljivem položaju, v katerem imajo pravne obveznosti in politične odločitve velik pomen, vendar meni, da Evropski parlament ne sme biti zavezan določbam iz člena 26.
The Rapporteur acknowledges that Parliament finds itself in a delicate position where legal obligations and political decisions are of considerable significance but believes that the European Parliament cannot take the risk to be bound by the provisions of article 26.
Ravno tako ne sme napovedati izida pogajanj o naslednji Finančni perspektivi in Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu.
Neither can it anticipate the result of the negotiations on the next FP-IIA.
Pravna služba Evropskega parlamenta je v obvestilu z dne 7. februarja obravnavala vzdušje negotovosti v zvezi z izidom pogajanj.
In a note dated 7 February, the European Parliament's Legal Service considers the context of uncertainty concerning the outcome of the negotiations.
Po mnenju pravne službe bi Medinstitucionalni sporazum lahko bil odpovedan "v začetku leta 2006" ob spoštovanju načela lojalnega sodelovanja med institucijami.
According to the Legal Service, denunciation of the IIA should take place “early in 2006” in respect of the principle of loyal cooperation between the institutions.
Kasnejša odpoved bi lahko pomenila, da bi Evropski parlament samoumevno sprejel prihodnji Medinstitucionalni sporazum.
A late denunciation could imply an implicit acceptance by the European Parliament of the future IIA.
Kot je razvidno iz mnenja pravne službe, poročevalec meni, da bi Parlament moral ohraniti svoje stališče v zvezi z možnostjo odpovedi veljavnega Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, preden bo sklenjen dogovor o novem Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu.
As the opinion by the Legal Service suggests, the Rapporteur believes that the European Parliament should reserve its position concerning the possibility to denounce the current IIA before the new IIA is agreed.
Po glasovanju o tej resoluciji bi lahko predsednik Parlamenta poslal pismo predsedniku Komisije in predsedniku Sveta, s katerim bi ju obvestil o odločitvi Evropskega parlamenta, ki potrjuje, da bo nadaljeval pogajanja brez poseganja v izid slednjih.
After the vote on the resolution, a letter could be sent by the President of Parliament to the President of the Commission and the President of the Council to inform them of the European Parliament decision confirming the will to continue the ongoing negotiations without prejudice of the outcome.
Takšna odločitev bi dejansko potrdila, da Parlament zavrača avtomatično nadaljevanje sedanje Finančne perspektive.
In reality, this decision would confirm Parliament's rejection of a mechanical continuation of the current FP.
Povezava s širitvijo
The link with enlargement
Poleg prehoda v obdobje po letu 2006 želi poročevalec postaviti še eno vprašanje, ki vpliva na letni proračun 2007 in zadeva širitev.
In addition to the transition beyond the year 2006, the Rapporteur wishes to raise another question which has an impact on the annual 2007 Budget, relating to enlargement.
Napovedi za pristop Bolgarije in Romunije temeljijo na politični odločitvi (s soglasjem Evropskega parlamenta), ki jo je treba sprejeti pred naslednjim poletjem.
The forecasts for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania are based on a political decision (with the consent of the European Parliament) to be taken before next summer.
Čeprav predlog Komisije temelji na Evropski uniji 27 držav, se sporazum o proračunu za 27 držav ne more skleniti, preden bo sprejeta formalna odločitev o širitvi.
Although the Commission has based its proposal on an EU with 27 countries, no agreement for a budget for 27 countries can be concluded before the formal decision on enlargement has been taken.
Zato poročevalec meni, da mora Komisija s Finančno perspektivo ali brez nje predstaviti PPP za leto 2007 za Evropsko unijo 25 držav in predložiti pisni predlog spremembe za Evropsko unijo 27 držav, ko bo širitev uresničena, podobno kot ob širitvi na 10 novih držav leta 2004.
Therefore the Rapporteur considers that with or without a new Financial Perspective, the Commission should present the PDB for 2007 for EU 25 and, once the accession becomes effective, present an amending Letter for EU 2 on a similar basis as for the enlargement to EU 10 in 2004.
Poročevalec na podlagi priloženega dokumenta zahteva od Odbora za proračun, da:
On the basis of the following document the Rapporteur asks the Committee on Budgets to:
· poudari bistveni pomen dejstva, da Komisija pusti manevrski prostor za letni postopek, in pozove Komisijo, naj predstavi PPP ob spoštovanju odločitev, sprejetih v postopku soodločanja, vendar naj pusti dovolj prostora za običajni potek letnega postopka v primeru, če bo dosežen sporazum o Finančni perspektivi/Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu;
· emphasise that it is essential that the Commission leaves a margin of manoeuvre for the annual procedure, urging the Commission to present a PDB, respecting the co-decisions but leaving sufficient margin to allow the normal evolution of the annual procedure, in case an agreement on the IIA/FP is reached;
· poziva Komisijo, naj predloži PPP za 25 držav članic, dokler se Bolgarija in Romunija dejansko ne pridružita.
ask the Commission to present the PDB for 25 Member States until the accession of Bulgaria and Romania becomes effective.
o političnih prednostnih nalogah za proračun za leto 2007
on political priorities for the 2007 Budget
„Domišljija je pomembnejša od znanja.“
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
V 80. letih 20. stoletja so prevladovali strukturni skladi, ne nazadnje za pomoč novim državam članicam iz Sredozemlja v prehodnem obdobju.
Then came the Structural Funds predominance in the 1980s, not least to help the transition of the new Mediterranean arrivals.
Hitrost dogajanja se je spremenila s padcem berlinskega zidu in propadom Sovjetske unije, ko so se razvijali zunanji programi za pomoč infrastrukturam v osrednji in vzhodni Evropi, kot sta programa Phare in Tacis.
The tempo changed with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union when external programmes were developed to assist infrastructures in Central and Eastern Europe with such actions as Phare and Tacis.
Spremembe niso uvedle le precejšnjih novih pristojnosti za Evropsko unijo za urejanje takšnih politik, kot so enotni trg, enotna valuta, okolje in nastajajoča zunanja politika.
Changes not only introduced vast new competences for the European Union to manage such policies as the single market, the single currency, the environment and an emerging foreign policy.
Svet v tem času ni miroval.
In the meanwhile, the world has not stood still.
Padec berlinskega zidu novembra 1989 je začel postopek širitve Evropske unije na osrednje in vzhodne evropske države, ki mora izraziti dobrodošlico še dvema vzhodnima državama, Bolgariji in Romuniji, kar je predvideno za januar 2007.
The fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989 started the process of Central and Eastern European enlargement of the European Union which has still to welcome two Eastern countries, Bulgaria and Romania, expected for January 2007.
Razen tega je bil na področju tehnologije dosežen velik napredek, kar zdaj preoblikuje svetovni trg.
Furthermore, huge advances in technology took place, which are currently reshaping the global marketplace.
Svetovni splet, star le nekaj več kot desetletje, z uvedbo brskalnega sistema leta 1995 ni bistveno spremenil le načina, kako ljudje delajo in poslujejo, ampak je v svetovni trg vpeljal tudi več kot 2 milijardi uporabnikov.
The world wide web, only just over a decade old with the introduction of the browser system in 1995, has fundamentally not only altered the way in which people work and do business, but also has brought in over 2 billion consumers into the global market.
Globalizacija ni nov pojav, ampak je dejstvo v življenju.
Globalisation is no new phenomenon, but is a fact of life.
Kot jo je nedavno opisal vodilni evropski industrialec, „je pojav postopnega in svetovnega odpravljanja fizičnih, političnih, družbenih, kulturnih, jezikovnih in drugih mej, ki ločujejo gospodarske regije, kulturne ali družbene skupnosti, politične režime in druge entitete“.
As recently described by a leading European industrialist, 'it is the phenomenon of the gradual and worldwide elimination of physical, political, societal, cultural , linguistic and other borders, which separate economic regions, cultural or scientific communities, political regimes and other entities'.
Ob posledični intenzivnosti svetovne konkurence se pojavlja osrednje vprašanje, ali so podjetniki in družbe sposobni zadostno se prilagoditi spremembam, ki potekajo.
With the resulting intensity in global competition comes the central question on the capability of entrepreneurs and societies to adjust sufficiently to the changes underway.
Medtem ko večina podjetij uspešno sprejema izzive, ki jih to prinaša, pa je uspešnost prilagajanja družb manj zanesljiva.
While most businesses are coping with the challenges this brings, there is less certainty about the success of societies to adjust.
Izjava, da se internacionalizira vse razen vlad, je nedvomno resnična.
The saying that everything is being internationalised except governments has an undeniably strong ring of truth about it.
Zadeve, kot so nujnost naložb v raziskave in spodbujanje inovacij ter zagotavljanje pravega okolja, v katerem lahko mala in srednje velika podjetja uspevajo, se vedno bolj priznavajo kot glavne prednostne naloge za konkurenčnost Evrope.
Issues such as the vital necessity to invest in research and promote innovation, and providing the right environment in which SMEs can flourish are increasingly recognised as major priorities for Europe's competitiveness.
Za potrebo po zagotavljanju dolgoročne oskrbe z energijo in povezane okoljske dejavnike bodo še naprej potrebne jasne rešitve.
The urgent need to assure long-term energy supplies and the related environmental factors will continue to require clear solutions.
Ne nazadnje bo učinek demografske spremembe in priseljevanja vedno pomembnejša tema oblikovalcev evropske politike.
Not least the effect of demographic change and immigration will be a theme of growing importance in the minds of European policy makers.
Evropa ne sme le upravljati postopka globalizacije, ampak ga mora poskusiti voditi!
Europe should not just manage the process of globalisation, it should try to lead it!
Razlog je preprost.
The reason is simple.
Ko EU končuje svoje razprave o novi finančni perspektivi, ki bo verjetno potekala do leta 2013, je za oblikovalce politike bistveno, da se osredotočijo na to, kar bodo dejanski izzivi za EU v prihodnjih letih, in da niso omejeni na stare pojme o tem, kaj so bile prednostne naloge pred desetletjem.
As the EU completes its discussions on a new financial perspective, probably running to 2013, it is essential for policy makers to focus on what the real challenges will be for the EU in the years ahead, and not be limited to old notions of what were priorities a decade ago.
Prvi proračun nove finančne perspektive mora biti strateške narave ter obravnavati tista področja zunanje in notranje politike, kjer lahko financiranje veliko spremeni in ki zagotavljajo pravo stroškovno učinkovitost.
The first budget of the new FP should be strategic in nature, looking at those areas of external and internal policies where funding can make a significant difference and which provide real value for money.
To je zlasti pomembno, če bi Unija na koncu sprejela finančno perspektivo, ki bi bila bolj omejen postopek kot temeljni premik v političnem stališču.
This is of particular importance should the Union eventually be landed with a FP which is more a holding operation than a fundamental shift in policy consideration.
Finančna perspektiva je bolj za 90. leta 20. stoletja kot za 21. stoletje.
It is a financial perspective more for the 1990s than the 21st century.
Zato poročevalec meni, da se mora razprava o proračunu za leto 2007 razvijati ob upoštevanju naslednjih treh točk:
This is why the rapporteur considers that the debate on the 2007 budget should develop with the following three strands in mind:
– politične prednostne naloge,
– Policy priorities
– stroškovna učinkovitost na podlagi kakovosti,
– Qualitative value for money
– začetek pripravljanja na pregled.
– Begin preparing for the review
Poročevalec meni, da obstajajo za leto 2007 za prvi letni proračun nove finančne perspektive naslednje prednostne naloge:
For 2007, the first annual budget of the new financial perspective, the rapporteur sees the following priorities:
– zunanji odnosi – vloga EU v globaliziranem svetu
– External Relations – the EUs role in a globalised world
§ sporazumi o partnerstvu/sodelovanju,
§ Partnership/Cooperation agreements
§ evropska sosedska politika in predpristopni instrumenti,
§ European neighbourhood policy & Pre-accession instruments
§ razvojna politika, demokratizacija in človekove pravice,
§ Development Policy; Democratisation and Human Rights
§ skupna zunanja in varnostna politika,
§ Common Foreign and Security Policy
– varnostna razsežnost –
– The Security dimension -
§ zunanja, npr. zanesljivost oskrbe z energijo, teroristične grožnje,
§ External e.g. energy security, terrorist threats
§ notranja, npr. mejna kontrola in priseljevanje,
§ Internal e.g. Border controls, immigration
– notranje politike –
– Internal Policies -
§ državljani in obveščanje,
§ Citizens and communication
Ne le da so bili razpoložljivi viri pod velikim pritiskom zaradi nepričakovanih zahtev za proračun za tradicionalne politike, ki so se sčasoma razširile, ko je začel potekati razvoj na mednarodni ravni, ki je potreboval podporo EU.
Not only have the resources available been under severe pressure due to unexpected demands on the budget for traditional policies, added over time as international developments have occurred which required EU support.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da mora biti pomembna proračunska prednostna naloga za leto 2007 podpiranje evropskih odnosov s preostalim svetom prek dejavnega sodelovanja.
The rapporteur is convinced that a significant budgetary priority for 2007 must be to support Europe's relationship with the rest of the world through active engagement.
Čas je, da EU vloži več energije v odkrivanje, kaj se dogaja zunaj njenih meja, in da spozna, kakšne so posledice njenih politik.
It is time for the EU to spend more of its energies in finding out what is happening beyond its frontiers and learn what consequences there are for its policies.
Pri tem mora sporočilo drugim državam, zlasti našim sosedam, graditi na že obstoječih sporazumih (kot so pridružitveni sporazumi v vzhodni Evropi in na Balkanu ter barcelonski proces na jugu ali strateško partnerstvo na Vzhodu).
In doing so the message to other countries, and particularly to our neighbours, must build on already existing agreements (such as Association agreements in Eastern Europe and the Balkans, and the Barcelona process to the south or the strategic partnership to the East).
V omejenih proračunskih okoliščinah bo treba določiti prednostne naloge.
In restricted budgetary circumstances, priorities will need to be established.
Glede na to so pomembna naslednja štiri področja:
The following four areas are relevant in this context:
Sporazumi o partnerstvu in sodelovanju
Partnership and cooperation agreements
To povečanje obsega in zapletenosti zunanjih odnosov Evrope deloma kaže na tekoče spremembe in nove potrebe v svetu, ki se globalizira.
This increase in the scope and complexity of the Europe's external relations partly reflects on-going changes and new necessities in a globalising world.
Vseeno, poročevalec meni, da, če želi EU v celoti prevzeti svojo vlogo verodostojnega globalnega partnerja, morajo njeni zunanji odnosi temeljiti predvsem na skladni celoviti strategiji, ki jasno opredeljuje interese Unije in strateške prednostne naloge v 21. stoletju.
However, the rapporteur believes that for the EU to fully assume its role as a credible global partner, its external relations must first and foremost be based on a coherent, over-arching strategy which clearly defines the Union's interests and strategic priorities in the 21st century.
Prvi korak k takšni širši strategiji bi lahko bila presoja obstoječih in predvidenih sporazumov, s posebno pozornostjo, namenjeno njihovemu namenu, učinkovitosti in interesom Unije ter vključenim strateškim ciljem.
A first step towards such a broader strategy could be an assessment of existing and envisaged agreements, with particular attention given to their purpose, effectiveness and the Union's interests and strategic objectives involved.
Vseeno kljub ponovni odločnosti EU in ameriške administracije za oblikovanje skupnega programa ni bilo doseženega veliko napredka pri prilagajanju odnosov med EU in Združenimi državami 21. stoletju.
However, despite the renewed determination of the EU and US administrations to shape a common agenda, there has been little or no progress in adapting the EU's relationship with the United States to the 21st century.
Kot je omenjeno v Bögejevem poročilu o političnih izzivih in proračunskih sredstvih, „se ta pristop ne kaže v predlogu Komisije in Evropski parlament mora sodelovati pri odločanju o takšnih zadevah, če imajo proračunske posledice“.
As noted in the Böge report on policy challenges and budgetary means, 'this approach is not reflected in the Commission proposal and the European Parliament should participate in decisions on such matters if they have budgetary implications'.
Evropska sosedska politika in predpristopni instrumenti
European Neighbourhood Policy & Pre-accession Instrument
V zvezi z instrumenti soodločanja je zelo pomembno vprašanje političnega vpliva Parlamenta in ga zdaj obravnavajo ustrezni odbori.
For the co-decision instruments, the question of policy influence of the Parliament is of high importance and is currently being dealt with in the respective committees.
Poročevalec v celoti podpira prizadevanje vodilnega odbora za usmerjanje razpoložljivih virov na prednostna področja (in ne podpira, da bi se to v celoti prepustilo Komisiji in Svetu v postopkih komitologije).
Your rapporteur fully supports the lead committees' efforts to steer the available resources to priority areas (rather than leaving this entirely to Commission and Council under comitology procedures).
Vseeno je zelo pomembno, da je na voljo dovolj možnosti za politično presojo v proračunskem postopku: struktura proračuna, ki jo bo predlagala Komisija in mogoče spremenil Parlament, je zato pomembna.
It is, however, very important that sufficient leeway is left for political judgment in the budgetary procedure: the budget structure to be proposed by the Commission, and possibly changed by the Parliament, is therefore relevant.
Poročevalec se zaveda, da se bo nekaj teh težkih odločitev rešilo in mora rešiti na ravni aktov iz postopka soodločanja, ki se zdaj obravnavajo.
The rapporteur is conscious that some of these hard choices will and should be settled at the level of the co-decision acts currently being dealt with.
Kako bi se obravnavalo 20-odstotno znižanje iz razdelka 4?
How would a 20% reduction under heading 4 be dealt with?
Kakšno bi bilo razmerje med finančnimi okviri treh glavnih aktov iz postopka soodločanja: sosedskim instrumentom, instrumentom stabilnosti in razvojnim instrumentom?
What would be the relationship between the financial envelopes of the three main co-decision acts: Neighbourhood, Stability Instrument and Development Instrument?
Kakšne bi bile posledice predpristopnega instrumenta in humanitarne pomoči, o katerih se ni soodločalo?
What would be the resulting effects on the Pre-accession Instrument and humanitarian aid that are not co-decided?
To so težka vprašanja, na katera bo mogoče odgovoriti šele, ko bodo znane nova finančna perspektiva in njene določbe o prožnosti.
These are difficult questions which can only be answered once the new FP and its flexibility provisions are known.
Ker se je število ljudi, ki živijo v skrajni revščini, v zadnjih treh desetletjih več kot podvojilo, mora učinkovita in skladna razvojna politika Unije veljati za bistven element sodelovanja Evrope s širšim svetom.
With the number of people living in extreme poverty having more than doubled over the last three decades, an effective and coherent development policy for the Union must be considered a crucial element of Europe's engagement with the wider world.
Poročevalec bi želel ponoviti poziv iz Bögejevega poročila, da se dajo na voljo zadostna sredstva za spoštovanje veljavne zaveze k zmanjšanju revščine in, najpomembneje, razvojnim ciljem tisočletja (RCNT).
The rapporteur would like to reiterate the call in the Böge Report for sufficient resources to be made available in order to honour existing commitments to poverty reduction and, most importantly, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).