natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju poročila Univerze Erasmus iz Rotterdama z dne 12. novembra 2003 o pomoči, ki jo je zagotovila pri preučitvi pripomb v zvezi s posvetovalnim dokumentom Komisije o reviziji Uredbe (EGS) št. 4056/86,
– having regard to the report from the Erasmus University of Rotterdam of 12 November 2003 concerning the assistance it provided in processing the submissions received relating to the Commission consultation paper on the review of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0314/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0314/2005 ),
A. ker evropski pomorski promet predstavlja sektor, ki se stalno razvija in deluje na globaliziranem in konkurenčnem trgu, za katerega so značilne nove oblike sodelovanja, združitev in povezovanj, ki nenehno spreminjajo tudi razmere in pogoje na trgu pomorskega, in ker številne velike ladijske družbe težijo h koncentraciji,
A. whereas European shipping is a sector which is constantly developing and operates in a particularly globalised and competitive market characterised by new forms of cooperation, mergers and alliances which are constantly transforming the circumstances and conditions of the market in maritime transport, and whereas there is a tendency towards concentrations in a number of large shipping companies,
B. ker je bil pomorski promet do sedaj razdeljen v dve glavni kategoriji: (a) na trg linijskih prevoznih storitev in (b) na trg storitev v izrednem ladijskem prometu; ker so linijski prevozi od leta 1875 organizirani po sistemu linijskih konferenc, storitve v izrednem ladijskem prometu pa se izvajajo brez določenih časovnih razporedov, pri čemer so tarife predmet prostih pogajanj glede na ponudbo in povpraševanje,
B. whereas maritime transport has so far fallen into two major categories: (a) the liner services market, i.e. scheduled services and (b) the market in international tramp vessel services, i.e. non-scheduled services, and whereas the first category of liner services has since 1875 been organised according to the system of liner conferences, while the second category operates in a non-scheduled manner and freight rates are freely negotiated according to supply and demand,
C. ker stabilizacijsko vlogo konferenc priznava tudi Kodeks vedenja linijskih konferenc Konference Združenih narodov za trgovino in razvoj,
C. whereas the stabilising role of conferences was recognised in the Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,
D. ker so bile z Uredbo (EGS) št. 4056/86 linijske konference izvzete iz pravil o konkurenci (člena 81 in 82 Pogodbe) in hkrati dovoljena prosta trgovina, kar je pomenilo, da je bila konkurenca zagotovljena od zunaj, medtem ko so storitve v izrednem mednarodnem ladijskem prometu in kabotaža (storitve pomorskega prometa izključno med pristanišči ene in iste države članice) izključeni iz izvajanja pravil konkurence Skupnosti (Uredba (ES) št. 1/2003),
D. whereas Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 exempted conferences from the rules of competition policy (Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty), but allowed free trade, which means that substantive competition from outsiders is ensured, while international tramp vessel services and cabotage services (maritime transport services that take place exclusively between ports in one and the same Member State) are excluded from the Community competition implementing rules (Regulation (EEC) No 1/2003),
E. ker se že pojavljajo nove oblike sodelovanja, kot so konzorciji družb linijskih prevozov, za katere prav tako velja skupinska izjema (Uredba (ES) št. 823/2000), ki je bila spremenjena, med drugim z Uredbo (ES) št. 611/2005; ker je njihov obseg različen, saj uredba ne more določiti priporočenih cen,
E. whereas other forms of cooperation are already appearing, such as consortia of liner shipping companies, which are also the subject of a block exemption (Regulation (EC) No 823/2000), which has been amended, inter alia by Regulation (EC) No 611/2005); whereas, however, their scope is different because reference rates cannot be set under the regulation,
F. ker ima izjema, ki velja za linijske konference zadnjih devetnajst let, pomembno regulatorno vlogo pri razvoju mednarodne trgovine in ker se zdi sedanji sistem konferenc veliko bolj „liberalen“ kot v preteklosti, pri čemer pa ohranja prednosti zagotavljanja zanesljivih linijskih prevozov po konkurenčnih cenah,
F. whereas the exemption for liner conferences which has been in effect for the last nineteen years has played a significant regulatory role in the development of international trade, and the present conference regime appears much more ‘liberal’ than in the past, while retaining the advantages of providing reliable liner services at competitive rates,
G. ker se je v obdobju 1997 - 2004 obseg mednarodne trgovine, ki se je razvila z glavnimi sistemi linijskih konferenc, izredno povečal, znatno (z nekaj nihanji) pa se je povečal tudi obseg tovrstne trgovine manjših sistemov konferenc,
G. whereas over the period 1997 - 2004 there was a remarkable increase in the volume of international trade handled by major liner conference systems and a significant increase in the volume of such trade handled by minor conference systems (with some fluctuations),
H. ker je Komisija v zvezi z revizijo Uredbe (EGS) 4056/86 sklenila, da
H. whereas, as regards the review of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86, the Commission concludes that:
(a) izvzetost konferenc linijskih prevozov ni več upravičena,
(a) there is no further justification for exempting liner shipping conferences,
(b) ni več upravičenega razloga za izključitev storitev v izrednem ladijskem prometu in kabotaže iz sistema splošnih pravil o konkurenci in pravil o izvajanju konkurence,
(b) there is no justification for the exclusion of tramp services and cabotage from the general competition rules and competition implementing rules,
(c) ni več potrebno ohranjati določb o tehničnih sporazumih in koliziji zakonov, zato predlaga, da se odpravijo;
(c) there is no valid reason for maintaining the provisions for technical agreements or the conflict of laws provision and proposes that they be abolished;
I. ker večina vpletenih strani podpira revizijo obstoječega sistema z namenom doseganja stabilnih cen, učinkovitih in kakovostnih storitev ter nadaljnje konkurenčnosti družb linijskih prevozov ter malih in srednje velikih ladijskih družb,
I. whereas a majority of the parties involved is in favour of a review of the existing regime with a view to achieving price stability, effective, high-quality services and the continued competitiveness of liner shipping companies and small and medium-sized shipping companies,
J. ker študijo vplivov trenutno izvaja svetovalno podjetje Global Insight na pobudo Komisije, da se bo lahko ocenilo posledice, ki bi jih lahko povzročila preklic in nadomestitev skupinske izjeme za linijske konference, vključene v Uredbo (EGS) št. 4056/86, s sistemom, ki temelji na alternativnem predlogu združenja ELAA;
J. whereas an impact study is currently being carried out by consulting firm Global Insight, on the Commission's initiative, with a view to assessing the consequences which might ensue if the block exemption for liner conferences included in Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 were to be repealed and replaced with a system based on the alternative proposal put forward by the ELAA;
2. poziva Komisijo, da natančno preuči posledice morebitnega alternativnega sistema za celoten sektor pomorskega prometa, namreč za člane in nečlane linijskih konferenc ter njihovo konkurenco (neodvisne subjekte), stranke (vkrcevalce) in končne potrošnike;
Calls upon the Commission carefully to consider the consequences of a possible alternative system on the entire marine transport sector, namely members and non-members of liner conferences and their competitors (independent bodies) their customers (shippers) and the final consumers
5. poudarja verjetnost negativih posledic v primeru splošne prevetritve sistema, ne le za velike trgovske družbe linijskih prevozov, temveč tudi za male in srednje velike, ter opozarja, da ni dokazov o tem, da bi odprava konferenc povzročila padec cen;
Emphasises the likelihood of adverse consequences in the event of a general overhaul of the system, not so much for large merchant shipping lines, but rather for small and medium-sized ones and emphasises also that there is no evidence that the abolition of conferences will bring about a fall in prices;
7. vztraja, da bo morala kakršna koli uredba za sektor upoštevati naravo regij, ki so na poseben način omejene, kot na primer tip regij, opisanih v členu 299(2) Pogodbe ES, ki so odvisne od nadaljnjega izvajanja posebnih storitev;
Maintains that any regulation in the sector will need to allow for the nature of regions affected by specific constraints, for example regions of the type described in Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty, which depend on the continued provision of services with special characteristics;
10. ugotavlja, da čeprav Uredba (EGS) št. 4056/86 predvideva sistem zaprtih konferenc, hkrati omogoča prosto trgovino, kar pomeni, da zagotavlja pomembno konkurenco zunanjih družb in ne dovoljuje drugih omejitev konkurence s strani linijskih konferenc;
Points out that while Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 adopts the system of closed conferences, it also allows free trade which means that substantive competition from outsiders is ensured and that no further restrictions on competition from liner conferences is permitted;
12. zavzema stališče, da predlog ELAA vsebuje zanimive postavke, ki bi jih Komisija lahko uporabila pri pripravi katere koli uredbe, ki kaj spreminja, in da bi katera koli takšna nova uredba lahko začela veljati za omejeno obdobje petih let, po izteku tega obdobja pa bi sledila njena ocena; meni, da bi morala Komisija preučiti skladnost teh točk s štirimi kumulativni pogoji, določenimi v členu 81(3) Pogodbe;
Takes the view that the proposal of the ELAA contains interesting points which should be taken up by the Commission in drafting any amending regulation and that any such new regulation might be made to come into force for a limited period of five years after the expiry of which an assessment would be carried out; takes the view that the Commission should examine the compliance of these points with the four cumulative conditions laid down in Article 81(3) of the Treaty;
Izredni mednarodni ladijski promet in kabotaža
International tramp vessel and cabotage services
Tehnični sporazumi
Purely technical agreements
Kolizija zakonov
Conflict of laws
Uporaba pravil ES o konkurenci v pomorskem prometu
The application of EC competition rules to maritime transport
Drugi predlog(-i) resolucije, vključen(-i) v poročilo
Motion(s) for resolution(s) included in report
o možnem kršenju države članice Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti
on a possible infringement of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities by a Member State
– ob upoštevanju člena 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965, pa tudi člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah predstavnikov Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, and Article 6(2) of the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976,
– ob upoštevanju zahtev Jeana-Charlesa Marchianija za zaščito njegove imunitete pred francoskim pravnim redom,
– having regard to the requests submitted by Jean-Charles Marchiani to defend his immunity before the French courts,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 5. julija 2005
– having regard to its resolution of 5 July 2005
Besedila, sprejeta tega dne, P6_TA(2005)0269 . , s katero se je Parlament odločil braniti imuniteto Jeana-Charlesa Marchianija,
Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2005)0269 . , in which it decided to defend the immunity of Jean-Charles Marchiani,
– ob upoštevanju člena 121(2) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 121(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0316/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0316/2005 ),
A. ker, kot je navedeno v njegovi sodbi št. 1784 z dne 16. marca 2005, nobeno besedilo, pravno ali običajno, kakor tudi nobeno ustavno načelo mu ne omogoča zaključka, da člen 100-7, prva alinea, francoskega kazenskega zakonika velja za poslance Evropskega parlamenta, francosko Vrhovno sodišče ni uveljavilo člena 10 zgoraj navedenega Protokola in je tako onemogočilo Jeanu-Charlesu Marchianiju sklicevanje na člen 100-7, prva alinea, francoskega kazenskega zakonika, ki velja za nacionalne poslance,
A. whereas, by arguing in its Judgment 1784 of 16 March 2005 that no law or convention, nor any constitutional principle, allowed it to conclude that Article 100-7, first subparagraph of the French code of criminal procedure was applicable to Members of the European Parliament, the French Court of Cassation did not apply Article 10 of the above Protocol, thus denying a Member of the European Parliament of French nationality the benefit of Article 100-7, first subparagraph of the French code of criminal procedure enjoyed by national members of parliament,
B. ker je v zgoraj navedeni resoluciji z dne 5. julija 2005 Evropski parlament zahteval, da se prej imenovana sodba z dne 16. marca 2005 razveljavi ali prekliče, ali da v vsakem primeru preneha stvarni ali pravni učinek omenjene sodbe,
B. whereas in the above resolution of 5 July 2005 Parliament called for the said judgment of 16 March 2005 to be annulled or overturned, and at all events for it to cease to have any practical or legal effects,
C. ker je, zaradi sporočil Evropskega parlamenta, ki so pritegnile njegovo pozornost na omenjeno resolucijo z dne 5. julija 2005, pravosodni minister Republike Francije izjavil, da je sodba Vrhovnega sodišča postala pravnomočna in da noben pravni postopek ne omogoča njene razveljavitve ali preklica, kot je predlagala omenjena resolucija,
C. whereas, following Parliament’s statements drawing attention to the above resolution of 5 July 2005, the Minister of Justice of the French Republic has said that since the judgment of the Court of Cassation had become final no legal action allowed it to be annulled or overturned as the resolution requested,
D. ker je Protokol o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti sestavni del primarne zakonodaje Evropske skupnosti,
D. whereas the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities forms part of primary Community law,
E. ker je pristojna francoska sodna oblast kršila primarno zakonodajo Evropske skupnosti, ko je zavrnila uveljavitev člena 100-7, prve alinee, francoskega kazenskega zakonika za poslanca Evropskega parlamenta francoske narodnosti,
E. whereas, by refusing to apply Article 100-7 of the French code of criminal procedure to a Member of the European Parliament of French nationality, the competent French court has infringed primary Community law,
F. ker je iz sodne prakse sodišča Evropskih skupnosti razvidno, da je odgovornost države članice dejansko lahko vezana na odločitev nacionalne sodne oblasti
F. whereas it is clear from the case-law of the Court of Justice that a Member State may be held responsible for a decision by a national court
Zadeva C-224/01 Köbler, Letno poročilo 2003, str.I-10239. ,
Case C-224/01 Köbler v Republic of Austria [2003] ECR I-10239. ,
G. ker je Komisija varuhinja Pogodbe ES, je njena dolžnost, da začne postopek, predviden v členu 226 Pogodbe,
G. whereas the Commission has a duty as guardian of the EC Treaty to begin proceedings under Article 226 of that Treaty,
Možno kršenje države članice Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti
Possible infringement of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities by a Member State
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravicah oseb z omejeno mobilnostjo v zračnem prevozu
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the rights of persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0047 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0047 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 80(2) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C6-0045/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 80(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0045/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0317/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0317/2005 ),
(1) Enotni trg storitev zračnega prevoza mora koristiti vsem državljanom na splošno.
(1) The single market for air services should benefit citizens in general.
Zato bi morale imeti osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo, ki je posledica invalidnosti, starosti ali drugih razlogov, možnosti zračnega prevoza, ki so primerljive možnostim drugih državljanov.
Consequently persons suffering the disadvantage of reduced mobility, whether caused by disability, age or another factor, should have opportunities for air travel comparable to those of other citizens.
Zato bi morale imeti invalidne osebe in osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo, ki je posledica invalidnosti, starosti ali drugih razlogov, možnosti zračnega prevoza, ki so primerljive možnostim drugih državljanov.
Consequently disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility, whether caused by disability, age or any another factor, should have opportunities for air travel comparable to those of other citizens.
Invalidne osebe in osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo imajo iste pravice kot vsi drugi državljani do prostega pretoka, svobodnega odločanja in nediskriminacije.
Disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility have the same right as all other citizens to free movement, freedom of choice and to non-discrimination.
To velja za zračni prevoz in druga področja življenja.
This applies to air travel as to other areas of life.
Izrecno mora biti navedeno, da imajo invalidne osebe in osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo pravico do prostega gibanja in nediskriminacije v zračnem prevozu.
It needs to be made explicit that disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility have the right to free movement and non-discrimination in air travel.
Besedno oblikovanje „osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo“ je pokroviteljski jezik ter pomeni težavo s posameznikom in ne nedostopnosti storitve ali infrastrukture.
The formulation "persons suffering the disadvantage of reduced mobility" is patronising language which implies a problem with the individual rather than the inaccessibility of the service or infrastructure.
Izraz „oseba z omejeno mobilnostjo“ je zavajajoč, ker izrecno ne vključuje posameznikov, ki so, med drugim, slepi, slabovidni, gluhi, naglušni ali imajo motnjo v duševnem razvoju.
The term “person with reduced mobility” is misleading because it does not explicitly include individuals who are, inter alia, blind, partially sighted, deaf, hard of hearing, or who have an intellectual disability.
Ti posamezniki ne doživljajo nujno omejene „mobilnosti“, ko potujejo, ampak namesto tega doživljajo omejeno komunikacijo, orientacijo v prostoru ali neodvisnost.
These individuals do not necessarily experience limited “mobility” when travelling, but instead, experience reduced communication, orientation or independence.
(2) Osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo je torej treba sprejeti in jim ne zavrniti prevoza na podlagi pomanjkanja mobilnosti, razen v primerih upravičenih varnostih razlogov, določenih z zakonom.
(2) Persons with reduced mobility should therefore be accepted for carriage and not refused transport on the grounds of their lack of mobility, except for justified safety reasons prescribed by law.
(2) Invalidne osebe in osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo je zato treba sprejeti in jim ne zavrniti prevoza na podlagi invalidnosti ali pomanjkanja mobilnosti, razen v primerih upravičenih varnostih razlogov, določenih z zakonom. uvedenih na ravni Skupnosti.
(2) Disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility should therefore be accepted for carriage and not refused transport on the grounds of their disability or lack of mobility, except for justified safety reasons prescribed by law.
Da bi osebam z omejeno mobilnostjo dali možnosti zračnega prevoza, ki so primerljive z možnostmi drugih državljanov, se jim mora nuditi pomoč na letališčih in na letalu, da bi se zadostilo njihovim posebnim potrebam, zaradi interesa družbenega vključevanja pa bi morale zadevne osebe takšno pomoč dobiti brezplačno.
(4) In order to give persons with reduced mobility opportunities for air travel comparable to those of other citizens, assistance to meet their particular needs at airports and on-board aircraft should be provided and, in the interests of social inclusion, the persons concerned should receive this assistance free of charge.
Da bi invalidnim osebam in osebam z omejeno mobilnostjo dali možnosti zračnega prevoza, ki so primerljive z možnostmi drugih državljanov, se jim mora ponuditi pomoč na letališčih in na letalu s strani ustreznega osebja, ki uporablja potrebno opremo , da bi se zadostilo njihovim posebnim potrebam, zaradi interesa družbenega vključevanja pa bi morale zadevne osebe takšno pomoč dobiti brezplačno.
(4) In order to give disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility opportunities for air travel comparable to those of other citizens, assistance to meet their particular needs at airports and on-board aircraft should be provided by the necessary staff using the necessary equipment and, in the interests of social inclusion, the persons concerned should receive this assistance free of charge.
Pomoč na letališčih, ki se nahajajo na ozemlju države članice, za katero velja Pogodba o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti mora, med drugim, omogočiti osebam z omejeno mobilnostjo gibanje od določene točke prihoda na letališče do letala in od letala do določene točke odhoda iz letališča, vključno z vkrcanjem in izkrcanjem.
(5) Assistance given at airports situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies should, among other things, enable persons with reduced mobility to proceed from a designated point of arrival at an airport to an aircraft and from the aircraft to a designated point of departure from the airport, including embarking and disembarking.
Organizirana mora biti na takšen način, da se izogne prekinitvam in zamudam in hkrati zagotavljala visoke in enakovredne standarde v vsej Skupnosti ter najbolje izkoristi denarna sredstva, ne glede na to, za katero letališče ali letalskega prevoznika gre.
It should be organised so as to avoid interruption and delay, while ensuring high and equivalent standards throughout the Community and making best use of resources, whatever airport or air carrier is involved.
Pomoč na letališčih, ki so na ozemlju države članice, za katero velja Pogodba o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti mora, med drugim, omogočiti invalidnim osebam in osebam z omejeno mobilnostjo gibanje od določene točke prihoda na letališče do letala in od letala do določene točke odhoda iz letališča, vključno z vkrcanjem in izkrcanjem.
(5) Assistance given at airports situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies should, among other things, enable disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility to proceed from a designated point of arrival at an airport to an aircraft and from the aircraft to a designated point of departure from the airport, including embarking and disembarking.
Te točke morajo biti označene vsaj na glavnih vhodih v terminale, na območjih z okenci za check-in, vlakih, lahkih železnicah, metro in avtobusnih postajah, taksi-postajališčih, drugih postajališčih in v parkirnih prostorih na letališčih.
These points should be designated at least at the main entrances to terminal buildings, in areas with check-in counters, in train, light rail, metro and bus stations, at taxi ranks and other drop-off points, and in airport car parks.