natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Najbrž je pomembneje, da delo, ki si ga je zastavil sklad, in situacija, ki je Skupnost prepričala, da k le-temu prispeva, še nista zaključena.
However, perhaps more importantly, the work which the Fund set out to do and the situation which led the Community to contribute towards it, is not over.
Gospodarske, družbene in psihološke rane, ki jih je povzročil več kot 30 let star spor, so globoko zarezane in čeprav so njihove sledi najmočnejše na Severnem Irskem, se občutijo tudi v sosednjih državah republike.
The economic, social and psychological scars caused by over 30 years of conflict still run deep and whilst their principal impact has been on Northern Ireland, their effects have also been felt in the neighbouring counties of the Republic.
Zato je nadaljevanje dejavnosti, ki zdravijo te rane, bistvenega pomena, močno zaželeno in vsekakor popolnoma dosledno z zgodovinsko vlogo pa je, da EU pri tem nadalje prispeva.
It is thus vital that the work to heal these wounds continue and it is highly desirable and indeed fully consistent with its historic role, that the EU continues to be associated with it.
Evropski svet je zato 18. junija 2004 (po predstavitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta in ostalih Komisiji, britanski in irski vladi) v zvezi z mirovnim procesom na Severnem Irskem sprejel naslednji sklep predsedstva
Thus, after representations were made to the Commission and to the British and Irish Governments by Members of the European Parliament and others, the European Council, on 18 June 2004, adopted the following Presidency’s conclusion in reference to the Northern Ireland peace process
Sklep predsedstva št. 47 - Evropski svet v Bruslju, 17.-18. junij 2004; Svet EU št. 10679/04 (CONCL 2) z dne 18.6.2004. : "Evropski svet se seznani s trenutnimi težavami v mirovnem procesu na Severnem Irskem in podpira prizadevanja obeh vlad v ponovni vzpostavitvi decentraliziranih institucij.
Presidency Conclusion No. 47– Brussels European Council 17-18 June 2004; Council of the EU No.10679/04 (CONCL 2) of 18.6.2004. : “ The European Council takes note of the current difficulties in the peace process in Northern Ireland and supports the efforts of the two governments in seeking to re-establish the devolved institutions.
V podporo tem prizadevanjem Evropski svet poziva Komisijo, da preveri možnosti za uskladitev posredovanj v okviru programa PEACE II in mednarodnega sklada za Irsko s tistimi v okviru drugih programov strukturnih skladov, ki se končajo leta 2006, vključno s finančnimi posledicami."
In order to support these efforts, the European Council calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of aligning interventions under the PEACE II programme and the International Fund for Ireland with those of the other programmes under the Structural Funds that come to an end in 2006, including the implications in financial terms. ”
Predlog Komisije je popolnoma v skladu s tem pozivom in ga je potrebno pozdraviti, čeprav je na žalost šele sedaj posredovan Evropskemu parlamentu.
The Commission’s proposal is fully in accordance with this call and should be welcomed, although it is to be regretted that it is only now that it is being forwarded to the European Parliament.
V zvezi z izvajanjem uredbe želi poročevalec spodbuditi Komisijo, da popolnoma upošteva člen 4, ki jo zavezuje, da v sodelovanju z upravnim odborom sklada določi primerno obveščanje in postopke le-tega, da bo tako razviden prispevek Skupnosti za projekte, ki jih financira sklad.
With regard to the implementation of the Regulation, the rapporteur would urge the Commission to make full use of Article 4 by which it is bound, in co-operation with the Fund’s Board, to determine appropriate publicity and information procedures in order to publicise the Community’s contribution to the projects financed by the Fund.
Tudi Komisija sama se je že seznanila s pojavljenimi težnjami, da se na IFI gleda kot na "ameriški sklad", zgoraj omenjeni podatki pa kažejo, da EU trenutno največ prispeva.
As the Commission itself has noted, there has been a tendency for the IFI to be regarded as an “American Fund”, while as the figures mentioned above demonstrate, the EU is now the largest contributor.
Tako je Komisija dolžna zagotoviti, da so prispevki evropskih davkoplačevalcev primerno priznani.
The Commission, thus, has a duty to ensure that the contributions of the European tax payer are duly recognised.
To poročilo je neločljivo povezano s soglasjem, ki ga mora ta Parlament za nadaljevanje programa PEACE podati k predlogu Komisije, obe področji pa naj se ocenita skupaj.
This report is inextricably linked with the Assent which this Parliament is required to give to the Commission’s proposal for the continuation of the PEACE Programme and the two issues should be assessed together.
Trenutno (oktober 2004) so institucije, ki so vzpostavljene v okviru sporazuma Good Friday, v negotovosti, potekajo pa pogovori o njihovi ponovni vzpostavitvi.
At the present time (December 2004), the Institutions set up under the terms of the April 1998 Good Friday Agreement remain in suspension as talks aimed at their reestablishment proceed.
Če Skupnost ne bi več finančno prispevala v IFI ali program PEACE, bi poslala popolnoma napačno politično sporočilo v tem kritičnem času, v tem iz potrebe še potekajočem mirovnem procesu.
The ending of the Community’s financial contribution to the IFI or the PEACE Programme would amount to sending precisely the wrong political message at this critical time in what is, by necessity, an on-going peace process.
Zato poročevalec poziva, da se ta predlog odobri hitro, brez predlogov sprememb, da lahko ta uredba začne veljati 1. januarja 2005.
For this reason, you rapporteur would urge that this proposal be rapidly approved, without amendment, so as to allow this Regulation to come into force on 1 January 2005.
Predlog uredbe Sveta o predlogu uredbe Sveta o finančnih prispevkih Skupnosti za Mednarodni sklad za Irsko (2005-2006)
Proposal for a Council regulation concerning Community financial contributions to the International Fund for Ireland (2005-2006)
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o uporabi postopka iz člena 251 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti določena za področja iz naslova IV tretjega dela te pogodbe
on the proposal for a Council decision providing for certain areas covered by Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community to be governed by the procedure referred to in Article 251 of that Treaty
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o uporabi postopka iz člena 251 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti določena za področja iz naslova IV tretjega dela te pogodbe
on the proposal for a Council decision providing for certain areas covered by Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community to be governed by the procedure referred to in Article 251 of that Treaty
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sveta (15130/2004)
– having regard to the Council proposal (15130/2004)
– ob upoštevanju druge alinee člena 67(2) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6­0208/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 67(2), second indent, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0208/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0072/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0072/2004 ),
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija
Text proposed by the Council
Predlog sklepa Sveta o uporabi postopka iz člena 251 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za določena področja iz naslova IV tretjega dela te pogodbe
Draft Decision of the Council providing for certain areas covered by title IV of Part three of the Treaty establishing the European Community to be governed by the procedure referred to in Article 251 of that Treaty
Osnutek sklepa Sveta po katerem se izvaja druga alinea člena 67(2) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti
Draft Decision of the Council implementing Article 67(2), second indent, of the Treaty establishing the European Community
Sprememba naslova je nujna, če Parlament obseg sklepa razširi tudi na pristojnosti Sodišča.
The change of title will be necessary if Parliament extends the scope of the decision to include the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice.
(7) Vendar pa je Evropski svet zavzel stališče, naj Svet do začetka veljavnosti Pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo pri sprejemanju ukrepov na področju zakonitega priseljevanja državljanov tretjih držav v države članice in med njimi, ki ga urejata člena 63(3)(a) in (4) Pogodbe, odloča soglasno po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
However, the European Council took the view that, pending the entry into force of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, the Council should continue to act unanimously after consulting the European Parliament when adopting measures in the field of the legal migration of third-country nationals to and between Member States referred to in Article 63(3)(a) and (4) of the Treaty.
Parlament meni, da sta soodločanje in kvalificirana večina na področju zakonitega priseljevanja bistvena za upravljanje selitvene politike Unije.
Parliament considers that codecision and qualified-majority voting on legal immigration are essential in order to manage the European Union's migration policy.
Kljub temu pa po podpisu Ustavne pogodbe zakonodaja na tem področju ne bi smela posegati v pravice držav članic na področju "kvot".
This having been said, since the signature of the Constitutional Treaty it has no longer been possible for legislation in this field to prejudice the rights of the Member States with regard to 'quotas'.
(10a) Obvezno in nujno je, da se iz člena 68 Pogodbe ES odpravi omejitve pristojnosti Sodišča na področju iz naslova IV, zato je 5. novembra 2004 Evropski svet že povabil Komisijo, naj po posvetovanju s Sodiščem in v skladu s členom 225a Pogodbe ES, predstavi predlog sklepa Sveta o ustanovitvi oddelka, specializiranega za pritožbe s področja tega istega naslova IV.
It is vital and urgent to abolish the limits which Article 68 of the EC Treaty imposes on the jurisdiction of the Court in the fields covered by Title IV of the EC Treaty; the European Council accordingly asked the Commission on 5 November 2004 to submit, after consulting the Court, a proposal for a Council decision establishing, pursuant to Article 225a of the EC Treaty, a specialised panel for actions relating to matters provided for in the said Title IV.
Člen 67(2) Pogodbe omogoča Svetu preklic omejitev pristojnosti Sodišča, določenih v členu 68.
Article 67(2) of the Treaty permits the Council to abolish the limits to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice provided for by Article 68.
Ta člen bi bilo torej primerno črtati in hkrati predvideti postopek ustanovitve specializiranega oddelka na Sodišču, kot to omogoča člen 225a Pogodbe ES.
It would therefore be appropriate to delete this article and at the same time institute the procedure for the setting-up of a specialised panel at the Court as permitted by Article 225a of the ECT.
Člen 1, odstavek 2(a) (novo)
Article 1, paragraph 2 a (new)
Kot je bilo dogovorjeno 29. oktobra 2004 ob podpisu Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo, ti ukrepi ne smejo prizadeti pravice držav članic pri določanju obsega vstopa državljanov tretjih držav, ki izvorno prihajajo iz tretjih držav in vstopajo na njihovo ozemlje z namenom poiskati si plačano ali neplačano zaposlitev.
As agreed on 29 October 2004, at the time of the signature of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, these measures must not affect the right of Member States to determine volumes of admission of third-country nationals coming from third countries to their territory in order to seek work, whether employed or self-employed.
Glej obrazložitev uvodne izjave 7.
See the justification for the amendment to Recital 7.
Člen 3(a) (novo)
Article 3 a (new)
Člen 3(a)
Article 3a
Takoj ko vstopi v veljavo tale odločitev, se prvi in drugi odstavek člena 68 Pogodbe ES ne uporabljata več.
Article 68(1) and (2) of the EC Treaty shall no longer apply from the date of entry into force of this Decision.
Ces craintes ne devraient toutefois plus exister depuis que le Traité de Nice a introduit dans le TCE l’art.
However, these fears should no longer exist since the Nice Treaty inserted in the ECT Article 225a
Predlog sklepa Sveta o uporabi postopka iz člena 251 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti določena za področja iz naslova IV tretjega dela te pogodbe
Proposal for a Council decision providing for certain areas covered by Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community to be governed by the procedure referred to in Article 251 of that Treaty
člen 67 ES
Article 67 CE
Podlaga v Poslovniku
Base in Rules of Procedure
OSNUTEK PRIPOROČILA ZA DRUGO OBRAVNAVO
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktiv Sveta 72/166/EGS, 84/5/EGS, 88/357/EGS in 90/232/EGS ter Direktive 2000/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zavarovanju civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi motornih vozil
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (16182/2003 – C6‑0112/2004 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (16182/2003 – C6‑0112/2004 ),
P5_TA(2003)0446 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2002)0244 )
P5_TA(2003)0446 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2002)0244 )
UL C 227 E, 24.9.2002, str.
OJ C 227 E, 24.9.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6‑0073/2004 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0073/2004 ),
(3a) Odškodninski zahtevki zaradi nesreče, ki jo je povzročilo vozilo s priklopnikom, pogosto niso uspešni, ker vlečnega motornega vozila ali njegovega zavarovatelja ni mogoče identificirati, čeprav je registrska tablica priklopnika znana.
(3a) Claims for damages arising from an accident caused by a vehicle with a trailer often fail because, although the trailer number plate is known, neither the towing motor vehicle nor its insurer can be identified.
Zato je treba v državah članicah uskladiti ustrezne predpise in priklopnike obravnavati kot enakovredne motornim vozilom.
Hence there is a need to harmonise the relevant provisions in the Member States and treat a trailer as equivalent to a motor vehicle.
Za ta namen je potrebna definicija priklopnika.
For this purpose a definition of trailer is required.
UVODNA IZJAVA 7 A (novo)
RECITAL 7 A (new)
(7a) Potrebne in ustrezne stroške sodnih postopkov (pravni nasveti, zdravstveni in tehnični izvedenci, pravni stroški) je treba vsaj najmanjše povrniti, če škoda nastane zaradi nesreče, ki spada na področje uporabe Direktive 2000/26/ES.
(7a) The necessary and appropriate costs of legal proceedings (legal advice, medical and technical experts, legal costs) should, as a minimum, be reimbursed where damage arises from an accident falling within the scope of Directive 2000/26/EC.
V primeru nesreč, ki sodijo na področje uporabe Direktive 2000/26/ES (nesreče v drugi državi), je nesporno, da je mogoče zahtevati pravno pomoč, strokovno znanje in morda stroške uveljavljanja upravičenosti prek sodišč.
In the case of accidents which fall within the scope of Directive 2000/26/EC (accidents in another country), it is incontestable that legal assistance, expert knowledge and possibly the expense of enforcing an entitlement through the courts may be required.
Če so ti stroški potrebni in ustrezni, so nesporno del materialne škode, saj jih oškodovanec ne bi imel, razen če je v nesreči povzročil škodo.
If these costs are necessary and appropriate, they incontestably form part of the material damage, as the injured party would not have incurred them but for the event which caused the damage, the accident.
Zato jih je treba povrniti.
They should therefore be reimbursed.
UVODNA IZJAVA 10
RECITAL 10
(10) Obveznosti držav članic, da zagotovijo zavarovalno kritje vsaj z določenimi najmanjšimi zneski, predstavljajo pomemben element pri zagotavljanju varstva oškodovancev.
(10) Member States' obligations to guarantee insurance cover at least in respect of certain minimum amounts constitute an important element in ensuring the protection of the victims.
Najnižje zneske iz Direktive 84/5/EGS je treba prilagoditi ne samo tako, da upoštevajo inflacijo, temveč jih je treba za izboljšanje varstva oškodovancev tudi realno povečati.
The minimum amounts provided for by Directive 84/5/EEC should not only be updated to take account of inflation, but should be increased in real terms to improve the protection of victims.
Da bi olajšali uvedbo teh najnižjih zneskov, se uvede prehodno obdobje petih let od datuma začetka izvajanja te Direktive.
With a view to facilitating the introduction of these minimum amounts, a transitional period of five years from the implementation date of this Directive should be established.
Države članice bi morale v tridesetih mesecih od datuma začetka izvajanja povečati zneske do vsaj polovice vrednosti.
Member States should increase the amounts to at least a half of the levels within thirty months of the implementation date.
(10) Obveznosti držav članic, da zagotovijo zavarovalno kritje nad določenimi najnižjimi zneski, predstavljajo pomemben element pri zagotavljanju varstva oškodovancev.
(10) Member States' obligations to guarantee insurance cover beyond certain minimum amounts constitute an important element in ensuring the protection of the victims.
Najnižje zneske iz Direktive 84/5/EGS je treba prilagoditi ne samo tako, da upoštevajo inflacijo, temveč jih je treba za izboljšanje varstva oškodovancev tudi realno povečati.
The minimum amounts provided for in Directive 84/5/EEC should not only be updated to take account of inflation but should be increased in real terms , to improve the protection of victims.
Višina najnižjega zneska kritja pri telesni poškodbi se izračuna tako, da se v celoti in pravično plača vsem oškodovancem z resnimi poškodbami, pri čemer se upošteva nizka pogostost nesreč z več oškodovanci in malo število oškodovancev z večjimi poškodbami v eni in isti nesreči.
The minimum amount of cover for personal injury should be calculated so as to compensate fully and fairly all victims who have suffered very serious injuries, whilst taking into account the low frequency of accidents involving several victims and the small number of accidents in which several victims suffer very serious injuries in the course of one and the same event.
Najnižji znesek kritja v višini 1.000.000 EUR na oškodovanca in 5.000.000 EUR na nesrečo, brez upoštevanja števila oškodovancev, je primeren in zadosten.
A minimum amount of cover of EUR 1 000 000 per victim and EUR 5 000 000 per event, regardless of the number of victims, is a reasonable and adequate amount.
Da bi olajšali uvedbo teh najnižjih zneskov, se uvede prehodno obdobje petih let od datuma začetka izvajanja te direktive.
With a view to facilitating the introduction of these minimum amounts, a transitional period of five years from the implementation date of this Directive should be established.
UVODNA IZJAVA 18
RECITAL 18
(18) Sprejeti bi morali ukrepe, ki bodo olajšali pridobitev zavarovalniškega kritja za vozila, uvožena iz ene države članice v drugo, čeprav vozilo v namembni državi članici še ni registrirano.
(18) Steps should be taken to make it easier to obtain insurance cover for vehicles imported from one Member State into another, even though the vehicle is not yet registered in the Member State of destination.
Uvesti bi morali začasno odstopanje od splošnega pravila, ki določa državo članico, v kateri obstaja tveganje.
A temporary derogation from the general rule determining the Member State where the risk is situated should be introduced .
Trideset dni od datuma, ko je bilo vozilo dostavljeno, dano na razpolago ali poslano kupcu, velja namembna država članica za državo članico, v kateri obstaja tveganje.
For a period of thirty days from the date when the vehicle is delivered, made available or dispatched to the purchaser, the Member State of destination should be considered to be the Member State where the risk is situated.
Zagotoviti bi morali začasno odstopanje od splošnega pravila, ki določa državo članico, v kateri obstaja tveganje.
A temporary derogation from the general rule determining the Member State where the risk is situated should be made available .
UVODNA IZJAVA 23 A (novo)
RECITAL 23 A (new)
(23a) Priklopnik predstavlja vir nevarnosti, neodvisen od vira, ki ga predstavlja vlačilec.
(23a) A trailer represents an independent source of danger from that constituted by the towing vehicle.
Zato bi bilo za potrebe vseh določb, vključno s tistimi v zvezi s obveznimi kritji, upravičeno obravnavati priklopnike kot enakovredne motornim vozilom.
Hence it would seem justified to treat a trailer as equivalent to a motor vehicle for the purposes of all provisions, including those relating to compulsory cover.
UVODNA IZJAVA 23 B (novo)
RECITAL 23 B (new)
(23b) Po členu 11(2), branim skupaj s členom 9(1)( b ) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti ter priznavanju in izvrševanju sodb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah 1 , lahko oškodovanci sprožijo pravne postopke proti ponudniku zavarovanja civilne odgovornosti v državi članici, v kateri imajo stalno prebivališče.
(23b) Under Article 11(2) read in conjunction with Article 9(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters 1 , injured parties may bring legal proceedings against the civil liability insurance provider in the Member State in which they are domiciled.
1 UL L 12, 16.1.2001, str.
1 OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p.
Uredba, spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1496/2002 (UL L 225, 22.08.2002, str.
Regulation amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1496/2002 (OJ L 225, 22.8.2002, p.
UVODNA IZJAVA 23 C (novo)
RECITAL 23 C (new)
(23a) V več državah članicah so poročila o nezgodah, ki jih pripravijo policija, pravni ali drugi organi, oškodovancem in zavarovateljem na razpolago kasneje, če sploh so, kar zadržuje poravnavo zahtevkov in vodi k dodatnim stroškom.
(23a) In several Member States accident reports prepared by the police, the legal authorities or other authorities are only made available to victims and insurers at a later stage, if at all, which delays the settlement of claims and leads to additional costs.
Oblikovanje javne internetne strani kot osrednjega skladišča, na kateri lahko imajo vse zainteresirane stranke dostop do teh dokumentov, je morda najboljša rešitev za navedene države članice.
The creation of a public internet site as a central repository where all interested parties may access these documents might be the best solution for those Member States.
Člen 1, točka -1 (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT -1 (new)
Člen 1, točka 1 (Direktiva 72/166/EGS)
Article 1, point 1 (Directive 72/166/EEC)
-1) V členu 1 se točka 1 nadomesti:
-1) In Article 1, point 1 shall be replaced by the following:
„Za namene te direktive:
“For the purposes of this Directive:
1. ‚vozilo‘ pomeni motorno vozilo, ki je namenjeno za potovanje po kopnem in ga poganja mehanska moč, vendar ne vozi po tirih,
1. ‘vehicle’ means any motor vehicle intended for travel on land and propelled by mechanical power, but not running on rails;
1a. ‚priklopnik‘ pomeni bivalno prikolico ali eno- ali večosni priklopnik z največjo dovoljeno maso nad 750 kg, za katerega je predvideno, da ga vleče vozilo, s prikolico ali brez;“
1a. ‘trailer’ means any caravan or single- or multiple-axle trailer of a permitted maximum weight of more than 750 kg that is intended to be towed by a vehicle, whether or not coupled;”
ČLEN 2
ARTICLE 2
Člen 1, odstavek 1 (Direktiva 84/5/EGS)
Article 1, paragraph 1 (Directive 84/5/EEC)