natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vsebuje ukrepe za zaščito podatkov in za ustanovitev skupnega odbora za ponovni sprejem ("skupni odbor") s posebnimi nalogami in pristojnostmi, da sprejema odločitve, ki imajo pravni učinek na nekatera tehnična vprašanja.
There are provisions for data protection and for the setting up of a Joint Readmission Committee ("the joint committee") with specific tasks and powers to take decisions which have legal effect on certain technical matters.
Ta odbor bodo sestavljali predstavniki Skupnosti (Evropske komisije, s pomočjo izvedencev iz držav članic) in Šrilanke.
This Committee will be composed of representatives of the Community (the European Commission, assisted by experts from Member States) and of Sri Lanka.
Sporazum tudi določa, da vse stroške za prevoz v zvezi z opravili za ponovni sprejem in prehod do meje ciljne države, ki izhajajo iz sporazuma, plača država prosilka.
The Agreement also stipulates that all transport costs incurred in connection with readmission and transit operations, as far as the border of the State of final destination, resulting from the Agreement, are to be paid by the requesting State.
Treba je opozoriti, da Šrilanka ni sprejela enostranske uporabe s strani držav članic EU standarda EU potnih listin za namene izgona.
It should be noted that Sri Lanka did not accept the unilateral use by EU Member States of the EU's standard travel document for expulsion purposes.
Namesto tega je privolila v uporabo skupne začasne potne listine, ki se jo v določenih primerih v skladu s tem sporazumom lahko uporabi za povratek (člen 2, odstavek 2; člen 3, odstavek 3; člen 4, odstavek 2; člen 5, odstavek 4).
Instead, it agreed on a common provisional travel document which, under certain circumstances, could be used for return purposes under this Agreement (Article 2, paragraph 2; Article 3, paragraph 3; Article 4, paragraph 2; Article 5, paragraph 4).
Veljavnost sporazuma je "za neomejeno obdobje".
The Agreement's validity is "for an unlimited period".
Skratka, stališče tega odbora je, da Svet lahko sklene ta sporazum s Šrilanko, in zato vabimo Odbor za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, da sprejme sklenitev sporazuma.
In conclusion, it is the view of this Committee that the Council should conclude this Agreement with Sri Lanka, and we therefore invite the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs to approve the conclusion of the Agreement.
Radi bi vendar poudarili, da je v vseh takšnih sporazumih treba biti pozorni na ključna vprašanja, kot je zagotavljanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic med celotnim postopkom.
We would, however, stress the need, in all such agreements, for attention to be paid to key issues such as ensuring that human rights are safeguarded throughout the procedure.
Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, naj kot pristojni odbor sprejme sklenitev sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Demokratično socialistično republiko Šrilanko o ponovnem sprejemu oseb brez dovoljenja za bivanje in naj pozove Svet, naj ga začne čim prej izvajati.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to approve conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation and to call for the Council to implement this as soon as possible.
Predlog sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Demokratično socialistično republiko Šrilanko o ponovnem sprejemu oseb brez dovoljenja za bivanje
Proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation
člen 63(3)(b), člen 300(2) (1), drugi stavek ter člen 300(3)(1) ES
Article 63(3)(b), Article 300(2) first subparagraph, second sentence and Article 300(3), first subparagraph, EC
Člena 51 in 83(7)
Rules 51 and 83(7)
PRIPOROČILO ZA DRUGO OBRAVNAVO
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o mejnih vrednostih ostankov pesticidov v ali na živilih ali krmi rastlinskega ali živalskega izvora in glede spremembe Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS
on the Council common position for adopting a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC
(Postopek soodločanja: druga obravnava)
(Codecision procedure: second reading)
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (9262/1/2004 – C6‑0110/2004 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (9262/1/2004 – C6‑0110/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave
– having regard to its position at first reading
Besedila, sprejeta P5_TA(2004)0299 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0117 )
Texts Adopted , P5_TA(2004)0299 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0117 )
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga ( KOM(2004)0587 )
– having regard to the amended proposal ( COM(2004)0587 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 62 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A6‑0049/2004 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0049/2004 ),
Skupno stališče Sveta
Council common position
Uvodna izjava 2
RECITAL 2
(2) Razlike med nacionalnimi mejnimi vrednostmi ostankov pesticidov lahko predstavljajo ovire pri trgovanju s proizvodi, navedenimi v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, in iz njih pridobljenimi proizvodi med državami članicami ter kot tudi med tretjimi državami in Skupnostjo.
(2) Differences in national maximum residue levels for pesticides can pose barriers to trade in products included in Annex I to the Treaty and products derived therefrom between Member States and trade between third countries and the Community.
Zato je v interesu prostega pretoka blaga, enakih konkurenčnih pogojev med državami članicami in varstva potrošnikov primerno, da se mejne vrednosti ostankov (MVO) v proizvodih rastlinskega in živalskega izvora določijo na ravni Skupnosti.
Accordingly, in the interest of free movement of goods, equal competition conditions among the Member States, as well as consumer protection, it is appropriate that maximum residue levels (MRLs) for products of plant and animal origin be set at Community level.
(2) Ta uredba neposredno zadeva javni pogled na zdravje in je pomembna za delovanje notranjega trga.
(2) This Regulation directly concerns how the public view their health and is relevant to the functioning of the internal market.
Razlike med nacionalnimi mejnimi vrednostmi ostankov pesticidov lahko predstavljajo ovire pri trgovanju s proizvodi, navedenimi v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, in iz njih pridobljenimi proizvodi med državami članicami ter tudi med tretjimi državami in Skupnostjo ter povzročajo razlike v varstvu javnega zdravja .
Differences in national maximum residue levels for pesticides can pose barriers to trade in products included in Annex I to the Treaty and products derived therefrom between Member States and trade between third countries and the Community and create differences in public health protection.
Zato je v interesu prostega pretoka blaga, enakih konkurenčnih pogojev med državami članicami in varstva potrošnikov primerno, da se mejne vrednosti ostankov (MVO) v proizvodih rastlinskega in živalskega izvora določijo na ravni Skupnosti, vendar upoštevajoč razlike v klimatskih pogojih in na osnovi najboljših kmetijskih praks (najmanj integrirano varstvo rastlin pred škodljivci)
Accordingly, in the interest of free movement of goods, equal competition conditions among the Member States, as well as equal consumer protection among all consumers , it is appropriate that maximum residue levels (MRLs) for products of plant and animal origin be set at Community level , but taking account of the variations in climate conditions and on the basis of the best available agricultural practices (integrated pest control) .
Uvodna izjava 2 iz izvirnega predloga Komisije se deloma ponovno vstavi.
Partial reinstatement of recital 2 from Commission's original proposal.
Izvirni dokument Komisije je omenjal javno zdravje, medtem ko ga v sprejetem stališču Sveta ni zaslediti.
The Commission's original document mentioned public health, which is missing from the Council’s adopted position, and it is important to keep some mention of it in.
Uvodna izjava 4
RECITAL 4
Nujno je zaščititi rastline in rastlinske proizvode pred temi organizmi, da bi preprečili zmanjšanje donosa ali škodo in da bi zagotovili kakovost spravljenih proizvodov, povečali produktivnost kmetijstva ter zaščitili naravno okolje z omejevanjem površine za kmetijsko proizvodnjo.
It is essential to protect plants and plant products against such organisms, not only to prevent a reduction in yield or damage to them but also in order to ensure the quality of the products harvested, to increase agricultural productivity, and to protect the natural environment by limiting the surface area needed for agricultural production.
Nujno je zaščititi rastline in rastlinske proizvode pred temi organizmi, da bi preprečili zmanjšanje donosa ali škodo in da bi zagotovili kakovost spravljenih proizvodov, visoko produktivnost kmetijstva ter zaščitili naravno okolje z omejevanjem površine za kmetijsko proizvodnjo.
It is essential to protect plants and plant products against such organisms, not only to prevent a reduction in yield or damage to them but also in order to ensure the quality of the products harvested, to ensure high agricultural productivity and to protect the natural environment by limiting the surface area needed for agricultural production.
V ta namen so na voljo različne metode: metode in prakse zaščite pridelka, kot so uporaba odpornih sort, kolobarjenje, mehansko odstranjevanje plevela, biološki nadzor, in kemične metode, kot so uporaba fitofarmacevtskih sredstev ali pesticidov, brez uporabe kemikalij.
To this end, different methods are available: non-chemical methods, practices such as using resistant varieties, crop rotation, mechanical weeding, biological control and chemical methods such as the use of plant protection products or pesticides.
Uvodna izjava 5
RECITAL 5
(5) Ena od najobičajnejših metod varstva rastlin in rastlinskih proizvodov pred vplivi škodljivih organizmov je uporaba aktivnih snovi v fitofarmacevtskih proizvodih.
(5) One of the most methods of protecting plants and plant products from the effects of harmful organisms is the use of active substances in plant protection products.
Morebitna posledica uporabe teh snovi je lahko prisotnost ostankov v obdelanih proizvodih, v živalih, ki se hranijo s temi proizvodi, in v medu čebel, ki so bile izpostavljene tem snovem.
However, a possible consequence of their use may be the presence of residues in the treated products, in animals feeding on those products and in honey produced by bees exposed to those substances.
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da ti ostanki niso prisotni v količinah, ki predstavljajo nesprejemljivo tveganje za ljudi in, kjer je to primerno, za živali.
It is necessary to ensure that such residues should not be present at levels presenting an unacceptable risk to humans and, where relevant, to animals.
(5) Ena od najobičajnejših metod varstva rastlin in rastlinskih proizvodov pred vplivi škodljivih organizmov je uporaba aktivnih snovi v fitofarmacevtskih proizvodih.
(5) One of the most common methods of protecting plants and plant products from the effects of harmful organisms is the use of active substances in plant protection products.
Ker je treba javnemu zdravju dati prednost pred interesi varovanja rastlin v skladu z Direktivo 91/414/EGS, je pomembno zagotoviti, da taki ostanki niso prisotni na vseh ravneh, ki predstavljajo nesprejemljivo tveganje za ljudi in, kjer je to primerno, za živali.
According to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market 1 , public health should be given priority over the interests of crop protection, thus it is necessary to ensure that such residues should not be present at levels presenting an unacceptable risk to humans and, where relevant, to animals.
MVO je treba omejiti na najnižjo, razumsko dosegljivo raven za vsak pesticid, da bi zaščitili ranljive skupine, kot so otroci in nerojeni otroci, ter da se kar najbolj zmanjša kombinacija učinkov več ostankov.
MRLs should be set at the lowest reasonably achievable level for each pesticide with a view to protecting vulnerable groups such as children and the unborn, and in order to minimise possible combined effects of multiple residues.
1 UL L 230, 19.8.1991, str.
1 OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p.
Direktiva, nazadnje spremenjena z direktivo Komisije 2004/99/EC (UL L 309, 6.10.2004, str.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/99/EC (OJ L 309, 6.10.2004, p.
Ponovno in delno se vstavi predlog spremembe, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Partial reinstatement of amendment carried at first reading.
Pomembno je potrditi, da se bodo po določitvi MVO zahteve javnega zdravstva vedno izpolnjevale in celo presegale.
It is important to acknowledge that public health requirements are always met and exceeded when MRLs are set.
Uvodna izjava 5a (novo)
RECITAL 5 A (new)
Z ozirom na izpostavljenost ljudi kombinacijam aktivnih snovi in njihovih kumulativnih in morebitnih sinergičnih učinkov na njihovo zdravje je treba po posvetu z Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane, ki poda predloge za izračun skupnih MVO, določiti skupne MVO.
In view of human exposure to combinations of active substances and their cumulative and possible synergistic effects on human health, aggregate MRLs should be set after consultation of the European Food Safety Authority, who will submit proposals for the calculation of aggregate MRLs.
V javnosti obstaja velika skrb v zvezi s kumulativnimi in sinergetičnimi učinki pesticidov.
There is great public concern about the cumulative and synergistic effects of pesticides.
Metodologije za ocenjevanje teh učinkov še nimamo, zato je pomembno, da nadaljujemo z razvijanjem metode, da bi pomirili legitimno zaskrbljenost javnosti.
While we have no methodology for evaluating this at the moment, it is important to continue working towards one in order to allay legitimate public concern.
Uvodna izjava 6
RECITAL 6
(6) Države članice ob registraciji predpišejo v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15 julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet, da se morajo fitofarmacevtska sredstva pravilno uporabljati.
(6) Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market provides that Member States, when issuing authorisations, are to prescribe that plant protection products be used properly.
Pravilna uporaba vključuje upoštevanje načel dobre prakse varstva rastlin , pa tudi načel integriranega varstva.
Proper use includes the application of the principles of good plant protection practiceas well as the principles of integrated control.
Kadar predstavljajo MVO pri registriranem načinu uporabe pesticida v skladu z Direktivo 91/414/EGS tveganje za potrošnika, je treba tak način uporabe spremeniti z znižanjem vrednosti ostankov pesticidov.
Where the MRLs arising from an authorised use of a pesticide under Directive 91/414/EEC present a risk to the consumer such use should be revised to decrease the levels of pesticide residues.
Skupnost bi morala spodbujati uporabo metod ali proizvodov, ki zmanjšujejo tveganje, in znižati količine uporabljenih pesticidov na vrednost, ki je v skladu z učinkovitim varstvom pred škodljivci.
The Community should encourage the use of methods or products favouring a reduction in risk, and a reduction in the amounts of pesticides used to levels consistent with efficient pest control.
Pravilna uporaba vključuje upoštevanje načel dobre kmetijske prakse.
Proper use includes the application of the principles of good agricultural practice as well as the principles of integrated control.
Smiselno je zmanjšati tveganje pri uporabi fitofarmacevtskih proizvodov, toda raziskave kažejo, da zmanjšanje količine uporabljenega pesticida ne pripomore k dosegi tega cilja.
It is sensible to reduce the risk of Plant Protection Products, but research suggests that reducing the level used does not do this.
Zato je treba poiskati optimalno vrednost.
Therefore we need to find an optimum level.
Uvodna izjava 12 a (novo)
RECITAL 12 A (new)
(12a) Pri obravnavi MVO pesticidov je treba tudi poudariti, da se redki potrošniki zavedajo tveganj zaradi uporabe pesticidov.
(12a) Whilst considering MRLs of pesticides, it should also be recognised that few consumers are aware of the risks arising from pesticides.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane bi morala pripraviti projekt, s katerim bi javnost seznanila s tovrstnimi tveganji.
It would be valuable to see the Authority embark on a project to fully explain such risks to the public.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 5, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 5 carried at first reading.
Uvodna izjava 12 b (novo)
RECITAL 12 B (new)
(12b) Države članice morajo pretehtati možnosti objave imen podjetij, katerih proizvodi vsebujejo več ostankov pesticidov, kot je najvišja dovoljena vrednost.
(12b) Member States should look into the possibility of publishing the names of companies whose products contain higher pesticide residues than the maximum permitted levels.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 15, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 15 carried at first reading.
Na ta način bi potrošnikom omogočili, da poznajo vsa podjetja, ki so presegla najvišje dovoljene vrednosti ostankov pesticidov.
This process would enable consumers to be fully aware of any companies who had exceeded maximum pesticide residue levels
Uvodna izjava 14
RECITAL 14
(14) Na ravni Skupnosti je treba določiti nekatere pogoje za vzpostavitev in nadzor MVO za proizvode rastlinskega in živalskega izvora.
(14) It is necessary to define at Community level certain terms used for the setting and control of MRLs for products of plant and animal origin.
(14) Na ravni Skupnosti je treba določiti nekatere pogoje za vzpostavitev in nadzor MVO in poročanje o MVO za proizvode rastlinskega in živalskega izvora ter smernice za sankcioniranje proizvajalcev ali trgovcev.
(14) It is necessary to define at Community level certain terms used for the setting and control and reporting of MRLs for products of plant and animal origin and guidelines for the sanctioning of producers or traders.
Predlog spremembe 7, sprejet v prvi obravnave se deloma ponovno vstavi.
Partial reinstatement of amendment 7 carried at first reading.
Smiselno je, da se standardi za poročanje o MVO določijo na ravni Skupnosti, sicer lahko pride do nejasnosti.
It is logical for reporting standards of MRLs to be set at Community level, or else confusion will arise.
Uvodna izjava 20
Recital 20
Pri uporabi fitofarmacevtskih proizvodov za krmne in prehrambene proizvode zunaj Skupnosti veljajo različne zakonite kmetijske prakse, zato se včasih količine ostankov pesticidov razlikujejo od tistih, ki nastanejo pri zakoniti uporabi znotraj Skupnosti.
(20) For food and feed produced outside the Community, different agricultural practices as regards the use of plant protection products may be legally applied, sometimes resulting in pesticide residues differing from those resulting from uses legally applied in the Community.
Prav zato bi bilo primerno, da veljajo za uvožene proizvode fiksne MVO, ki upoštevajo take uporabe in iz njih izvirajoče ostanke, in sicer pod pogojem, da je mogoče dokazati varnost proizvoda z uporabo istih kriterijev kot za domači proizvod.
It is therefore appropriate that MRLs be fixed for imported products that take these uses and the resulting residues into account provided that the safety of the products can be demonstrated using the same criteria as for domestic produce.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 9, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of Amendment 9 adopted at first reading.
Tako za uvožena živila in uvoženo krmo kot za tista živila in tisto krmo, proizvedena znotraj EU, bi morala veljati ista pravila.
The same rules should apply to imported foodstuffs and feed as to foodstuffs and feed produced within the EU.
Uvodna izjava 23
RECITAL 23
(23) Pred določitvijo MVO bi bilo treba izvesti posvetovanje s trgovinskimi partnerji Skupnosti o predlaganih MVO, ob posredovanju Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, in upoštevati njihove pripombe.
(23) Through the World Trade Organisation, the Community's trading partners should be consulted about the MRLs proposed, and their observations should be taken into account before the MRLs are adopted.
Pri določitvi MVO Skupnosti je treba prav tako upoštevati MVO, ki jih na mednarodni ravni določa Komisija Codex Alimentarius.
MRLs set at the international level by the Codex Alimentarius Commission should also be considered when Community MRLs are being set.
(23) Pred določitvijo MVO bi bilo treba izvesti posvetovanje s trgovinskimi partnerji Skupnosti o predlaganih MVO, ob posredovanju Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, in upoštevati njihove pripombe.
(23) Through the World Trade Organization, the Community's trading partners should be consulted about the MRLs proposed, and their observations should be taken into account before the MRLs are adopted.
Pri določitvi MVO Skupnosti je treba prav tako upoštevati MVO, ki jih na mednarodni ravni določa Komisija Codex Alimentarius , vendar le, če se pri tem spoštuje integrirano varstvo rastlin pred škodljivci in upoštevajo podnebne razmere.
MRLs set at the international level by the Codex Alimentarius Commission should also be considered when Community MRLs are being set , but only if the principles of integrated pest control are respected and climate conditions and good agricultural practice are taken into account .
Sprememba znova potrjuje stališče EP v spremembi 11 v prvi obravnavi.
This amendments reaffirms the EP´s position in amendment 11 in first reading.
Uvodna izjava 23 a (novo)
RECITAL 23 A (new)
(23a) Pri uporabi fitofarmacevtskih proizvodov za krmne in prehrambene proizvode zunaj Skupnosti veljajo različne zakonite kmetijske prakse, zato se ostanki pesticidov razlikujejo od tistih, ki so rezultat zakonite uporabe znotraj Skupnosti.
(23a) For food and feed produced outside the Community, different agricultural practices as regards the use of plant protection products may be legally applied, resulting in pesticide residues differing from those resulting from uses legally applied in the Community.
Prav zato bi bilo primerno, da se za uvožene proizvode določijo fiksne MVO, ki upoštevajo take uporabe in iz njih izvirajoče ostanke, in sicer pod pogojem, da je mogoče dokazati varnost proizvoda z uporabo istih kriterijev kot za domači proizvod.
It is therefore appropriate that MRLs be fixed for imported products that take these uses and the resulting residues into account provided that the safety of the products can be demonstrated using the same criteria as for domestic produce.
Uvodna izjava 24
RECITAL 24
(24) Organ mora presoditi zahteve za MVO in ocenjevalna poročila držav članic, da se ugotovi tveganje za potrošnike in, kjer je to primerno, za živali.
(24) It is necessary that the Authority assess MRL applications and evaluation reports prepared by the Member States with a view to determining the associated risks to consumers and, where relevant, to animals.
(24) Organ mora presoditi zahteve za MRL in ocenjevalna poročila držav članic, da se ugotovi tveganje za potrošnike in, kjer je to primerno, za živali.
(24) It is necessary that the Authority assess MRL applications and evaluation reports prepared by the Member States with a view to determining the associated risks to consumers and, where relevant, to animals.