natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sklep Sveta (13886/2005) se razlikuje od predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0435 ) postopkovno in v smislu nekaterih občutljivih vprašanj sosednjih držav članic.
The Council Decision (13886/2005) differs from the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0435 ) in terms of procedure and with regard to some sensibilities of neighbouring Member States.
Kar zadeva postopek sprejemanja odločitev, za člen 4 Sklepa ne velja več splošno pravilo kvalificirane večine, temveč soglasje oz. kvalificirana večina glede na ustrezne pravne določbe Pogodbe o Evropski skupnosti (PES).
With regard to the decision-making procedure, Art. 4 of the Decision has been changed from a general rule of Qualified Majority Vote (QMV) to either Unanimity or QMV depending on the relevant legal provisions of the Treaty of the European Community (TEC).
Vendar ustrezne določbe niso navedene v Sklepu Sveta.
However, the relevant provisions are not stated in the Council Decision.
Enaka zapletenost postopka je v členu 5.
The same procedural complexity is found in Article 5.
Ministrski svet Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti bo v primeru pristopa nove države odločal s soglasjem.
Unanimity will be used by the Ministerial Council of the Energy Treaty in cases of accession of a new State.
Vendar bo glasovanje s kvalificirano večino veljalo za primere, ko Svet Energetske skupnosti pooblasti Komisijo za razprave v okviru Energetske skupnosti.
However, QMV will be used when the EC Council authorises the Commission to deliberate within the Energy Community.
Prav tako je določba v predlogu Komisije, ki od Sveta zahteva posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom pred sprejetjem stališča ES, sedaj črtana v popravljenem besedilu.
And the provision requiring the Council to consult the EP before adopting the position of the EC - under the Commission proposal - is now deleted in the revised text.
Kot nadomestilo, se Evropski parlament "takoj in izčrpno obvesti o vsakem sklepu Sveta" (glej člen 5 (5)).
As compensation, the EP "shall be immediately and fully informed of any Decision of the Council" (see Art. 5 (5)).
Kar zadeva vsebino sklepa Sveta, je treba opozoriti na vsaj tri spremembe.
In terms of substance of the Council Decision, there are at least three changes that merit closer examination.
Prvič, člen 4(3) določa določbe za zagotavljanje "medsebojne pomoči v primeru motenj" (glej poglavje IV naslova IV Pogodbe).
First, Article 4, paragraph 3, lays down the provisions for providing " mutual assistance in the event of disruption " (see Treaty's Title IV, Chapter IV).
Vendar isti člen sklepa določa, da "v primeru posebnih okoliščin" stališče ES "lahko preseže pravni red Skupnosti".
Yet the same article of the Decision stipulates that " in the event of special circumstances ", the position of the EC " may go beyond the acquis communautaire ".
Kaj so potem "posebne okoliščine"?
Hence what are these "special circumstances"?
Kaj je mišljeno s stavkom: 'lahko preseže pravni red Skupnosti'?
What is it meant by the phrase: 'it may go beyond the acquis communautaire'?
Drugič, Komisija se mora preden predlaga ukrepe iz Naslova III (Mehanizmi za delovanje trgov za omrežno energijo) Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti ustrezno posvetovati s petimi državami članicami, ki so v sosedstvu z državami na Balkanu (člen 4(4) Sklepa).
Second, the five Member States neighbours to the Balkan region countries shall be duly consulted by the Commission prior to tabling any measures under Title III concerning the mechanism for operation of Network Energy Markets of the ECT (Art. 4(4) of Decision).
Tretjič, podpisani pogodbi je dodana Priloga IV, ki določa prispevek vsake strani v proračun Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti.
Third, Annex IV attached to the signed Treaty text defines the contribution of each party to the budget of the ECT.
Približno 94,9 % bo pokril proračun ES, ostanek bo poravnalo 9 pogodbenic iz Balkana, med katerimi je Romunija z 2,2 % skupnega zneska.
Some 94,9% of the total will be covered by the EC Budget and the rest by the 9 parties of the Balkan region, of which Romania will bear some 2,2% of the total.
Navedene številke kažejo, da bo prispevek ostalih pogodbenic simboličen.
Hence the rest of the parties will contribute a token amount.
Celotni okvirni finančni stroški za leta od 2007 do 2012/13 so bili v predlogu Komisije 38.074 EUR.
The total indicative financial cost for the years: 2007 to 2012/13 in the Commission proposal was 38,074 million Euro.
Vendar nimamo na voljo številk finančne perspektive, ki jih je 17. decembra 2005 določil Evropski svet.
However, we do not have the figures under the Financial Perspectives agreed by the European Council of 17 December 2005.
Politično sporočilo
The Political Message
Določeni politični, gospodarski in varnostni razlogi govorijo v prid Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti.
There are a number of arguments, such as political, economic, security, etc., which support the case for the ECT.
Prvič, za EU je osrednjega pomena zamisel o skupnem trgu z energijo, ki sedaj vključuje še devet držav jugovzhodne Evrope.
First, the idea of a common energy market is central to the EU, which is now extended to nine South-East countries.
Obstaja soglasje o prizadevanju za skupne politike na področju zunanje trgovine, medsebojne pomoči in odpravljanja ovir na notranjem trgu z energijo.
There is agreement to work toward common policies for external trade, mutual assistance and the removal of internal energy market barriers.
Pogodba o Energetski skupnosti si prizadeva za širitev prednosti, ki jih nudi notranji trg z energijo, za pripravo institucionalne strukture v državah pogodbenicah in za spremembo vzorcev sodelovanja pred njihovim članstvom v EU.
The ECT aims to extend the benefits of the internal energy market, prepare the institutional structure of the contracting parties and change patterns of co-operation before they become members of the EU.
Drugič, osrednjo pozornost namenja vprašanju varnosti oskrbe z energijo (glej člene 2 (1) (c), 29 in 30 Pogodbe).
Second, it focuses on the issue of security of energy supply (see Treaty's Art. 2 (1) (c), 29 and 30).
Trenutno je to še posebej aktualno zaradi spora med Rusijo (Gazprom) in Ukrajino (Naftogaz) glede cene zemeljskega plina (Gazprom je hotel zvišati ceno za 1000 kubičnih metrov plina od 50 na 230 USD, medtem ko je Naftogaz odklonil plačilo) in stroškov tranzita.
This is particularly topical today as a result of the dispute between Russia (Gazprom) and Ukraine (Naftogaz) over the price of natural gas (Gazprom wanted to raise the price of 1 000 cubic metres of gas from $50 to $230 and Naftogaz refused to pay) and the cost of transit.
V času vojn na Balkanu (1992-95) so bile v jugovzhodni Evropi razmere še bolj zahtevne .
However, South-East Europe experienced harder times during the Balkan Wars (1992-95).
Navajam sledeče besede Komisije: "Vzemimo primer Bosne in Hercegovine.
The following quote from the Commission will suffice: "Take the example of Bosnia and Herzegovina .
Onemogočanje oskrbe prebivalstva z energijo je bil eden poglavitnih vojnih ciljev v BiH.
The cutting of energy supply for citizens was one of the main war targets in BiH .
Vojska, ki je oblegala Sarajevo, je uničila vso infrastrukturo pod svojim nadzorom.
The besieging forces in Sarajevo destroyed all the infrastructures under their control.
Sarajevo ni imelo lastnih virov električne energije.
Sarajevo did not have any of its own power resources.
Vsi visoko napetostni daljnovodi, ki so oskrbovali mesto z elektriko, so bili odsekani, čeprav bi najbližja elektrarna na Jablanici lahko zagotavljala nekaj elektrike. ...
All high voltage transmission lines supplying Sarajevo with electricity were cut, although the nearest power plant at Jablanica could produce some electricity. ...
Onemogočena je bila tudi oskrba s plinom (iz Rusije preko Srbije). ...
The gas supply (from Russia through Serbia ) was also cut. ...
Spor med Rusijo in Ukrajino je novejši dogodek na področju varnosti oskrbe z energijo.
A more recent event of security of energy supply concerns the Russia-Ukraine dispute.
Rešitev spora so pozdravile vse institucije EU, komisar Piebalgs pa je podal zanimivo mnenje: "Do sedaj je vprašanje varnosti oskrbe z energijo zares sodilo le v nacionalni okvir držav članic; dejansko pa potrebujemo veliko širši vseevropski pristop do tega vprašanja.
Its resolution has been welcomed by all Institutions of the EU but Commissioner Piebalgs made an interesting point: " To date, the issue of security of energy supply is only really considered at national Member State level; but in reality we need a much greater European-wide approach on this issue.
Na to je opozoril tudi vrh v Hampton Courtu.
Indeed, the need for this was already identified at the Hampton Court Summit .
Prvo sporočilo o novi evropski energetski politiki bom objavil spomladi, dokončni zaključki in predlogi pa bodo oblikovani pred koncem leta" (govor/06/1).
I will issue a first Communication on a new European Energy Policy in spring, drawing final conclusions and proposals before the end of the year " (Speech/06/1).
Vašemu poročevalcu in predsedniku tega odbora bi bilo v veselje, če bi lahko Evropska komisija pripravila obljubljeni zakonodajni predlog iz zgornje navedbe v predvidenem časovnem okviru.
Your rapporteur and Chairman of this committee would be delighted if the European Commission were able to deliver the legislative proposals promised in the above mentioned quote in the time span specified.
Vendar najbolj pereča vprašanja v tem okviru zadevajo izvajanje zgodovinske Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti na vseh njenih področjih.
However, the pressing question in this regard is to implement the historic Energy Community Treaty in all its aspects.
Če bi se izkazala za uspešno, bi lahko služila kot zgleden primer za nadaljnja regionalna sodelovanja na področju energije.
If successful, it may serve as an example for future applications of this type of regional co-operation in the field of energy.
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti s strani Evropske skupnosti
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
on the draft Commission regulation (EC, Euratom) amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
– ob upoštevanju osnutka uredbe Komisije ( SEC(2005)1240 ),
– having regard to the draft Commission regulation ( SEC(2005)1240 ),
– po posvetovanju s Komisijo s pismom z dne 12. oktobra 2005 v skladu z izjavo
– having been consulted by the Commission by letter of 12 October 2005 in accordance with the declaration
Dokument Sveta 10003/02 dop.
Council document 10003/02 add.
1. , sprejeto v okviru spravnega postopka pred sprejetjem finančne uredbe v povezavi z njenim členom 183 ( C6-0355/2005 ),
1. adopted in the context of the conciliation procedure prior to the adoption of the Financial Regulation in relation to Article 183 thereof ( C6-0355/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0135/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6‑0135/2006 ),
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 5 A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5 A (new)
Člen 43, odstavek 2, točka (ca) (novo) (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 43, paragraph 2, point (c a) (new) (Regulation (EC, Euratom), No 2342/2002)
(5a) Členu 43(2) se doda naslednja točka:
(5a) In Article 43(2), the following point is added:
"(ca) Mednarodna zveza za ohranjanje narave in naravnih virov."
"(ca) the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources."
Cilji in struktura Mednarodne zveze za ohranjanje narave in naravnih virov opravičujejo enako obravnavo kot pri že omenjenih institucijah.
IUCN’s aims and structure justify a treatment equal to that of the institutions already mentioned.
Člen 56, odstavek 3 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 56, paragraph 3 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
Vsaka institucija obvesti proračunski organ o vsakem imenovanju ali razrešitvi računovodje.
Each institution shall inform the budgetary authority of the appointment or termination of duties of its accounting officer.
Predaja poročila vsebuje tudi rezultate vseh pripravljenih bruto bilanc in zlasti vse pripravljene rezervacije.
The handing over report shall also contain the result of any trial balance made and in particular any reservations made.
Proračunski organ mora informacije pridobiti zato, da lahko svoje dolžnosti opravlja temeljito in utemeljeno.
The budgetary authority must receive information in order to complete its duties in a thorough and substantiated way.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 14
ARTICLE 1, POINT 14
Člen 68 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 68 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
Skrbnika računa izločenih sredstev se izbere med uradniki ali, če je potrebno, med drugimi člani osebja.
Imprest administrators shall be chosen from officials or, should the need arise, from other members of staff.
Če se pojavi potreba, je lahko začasno in/ali pomožno osebje izbrano le v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih.
Should need arise, temporary and/or auxiliary staff may only be chosen in duly substantiated cases.
Terjatve do začasnega in pomožnega osebja, ki izhajajo iz kršitev pri opravljanju dela kot skrbnik računa izločenih sredstev, je zaradi narave njihove zaposlitve teže uveljavljati kot do stalnega osebja.
Due to the nature of their employment, enforcement of claims against temporary and auxiliary staff arising out of misconduct in their office as imprest administrators is subject to greater difficulties than enforcement against permanent staff.
Da se zagotovi finančni interes Skupnosti, morajo biti izbrani le v okviru prej navedenih predpogojev.
In order to protect the Communities’ financial interest, they should therefore only be chosen under the preconditions set out before .
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 28 (AA) (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 28 (A A) (new)
Člen 106, odstavek 4 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 106, paragraph 4 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
(aa) Odstavek 4 se nadomesti z:
( aa ) Paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
Odgovorni odredbodajalec lahko prekine rok za plačilo tako, da upnike kadar koli v obdobju iz odstavka 1 obvesti, da zahtevka za plačilo ni mogoče poravnati, bodisi ker znesek še ni zapadel bodisi ker niso bila predložena ustrezna dokazila.
The authorising officer responsible may suspend the time limit for payment by informing creditors, at any time during the period referred to in paragraph 1, that the payment request cannot be met, either because the amount is not due or because the appropriate supporting documents have not been produced.
Če odgovorni odredbodajalec pridobi informacije, zaradi katerih nastane utemeljeni sum o upravičenosti izdatka, za katerega je dan zahtevek za plačilo, lahko odredbodajalec začasno prekine rok za plačilo, da izvede dodatna preverjanja, vključno s pregledom na kraju samem in tako še pred plačilom preveri, ali je izdatek v resnici upravičen.
If info r mation comes to the notice of the authorising officer responsible which puts in reasonable doubt the eligibility of expe n diture appearing in a payment request, the authorising officer may suspend the time limit for payment for the purpose of further verification, including an on-the-spot check, in order to ascertain, prior to payment, that the expenditure is indeed eligible.
Odredbodajalec o tem čim prej obvesti zadevnega upravičenca.
The authorising officer shall inform the beneficiary in question as soon as possible.
Upravičenca obvesti tudi o tem, da lahko plačilo ostane zadržano, dokler upravičenec odredbodajalcu ne predloži zahtevanih informacij.
He shall inform the beneficiary also that payment may be withheld until the beneficiary has supplied the information required by the authorising officer.
Preostali rok za plačilo začne spet teči od datuma, na katerega je prvič evidentiran pravilno formuliran zahtevek za plačilo.
Time for the purposes of the remainder of the payment period shall begin to run again from the date on which the properly formulated payment request is first registered.
Vendar je treba plačilo opraviti najkasneje do izteka dvakratnega začetnega plačilnega roka, razen v primeru, ko upravičenec odredbodajalcu do tega roke še ni priskrbel zahtevanih informacij."
However, payment must be made no later than the expiry of twice the initial payment period, unless the beneficiary has by this time not supplied the information required by the authorising officer."
S tem predlogom spremembe bi povečali zanesljivost ukrepov institucij EU za upravičence plačil.
The amendment aims at increasing the calculability of the actions of EU-institutions for the beneficiaries of payments.
Kadar je plačilno obdobje večkrat prekinjeno, upravičenci po sedanjem sistemu ne morejo vedeti, kdaj bodo prejeli plačilo.
Under the present system, beneficiaries cannot be certain, when they will receive payments, where the payment period is interrupted several times.
Po novem pravilu bo obdobje začetnega plačila v najslabšem primeru dvakrat daljše, razen če upravičenec odredbodajalcu ne predloži informacij.
Under the new rule, the initial payment period may - at worst – double unless the beneficiary withholds information from the authorizing officer.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 36
ARTICLE 1, POINT 36
Člen 129 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 129 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
Za naročila v vrednosti, ki je manjša od ali enaka 60.000 EUR , se lahko uporablja postopek s pogajanji, pri čemer se morajo potekati posvetovanja z najmanj petimi kandidati.
A negotiated procedure with consultation of at least five candidates may be used for contracts with a value less than or equal to EUR 60 000 .
Če po posvetovanju s kandidati naročnik prejme samo eno ponudbo, ki je administrativno in tehnično veljavna, se lahko naročilo odda, če so izpolnjena vsa merila za dodelitev.
If, following consultation of the candidates, the contracting authority receives only one tender that is administratively and technically valid, the contract may be awarded provided that the award criteria are met.
Za naročila v vrednosti, ki je manjša od ali enaka 80.000 EUR , se lahko uporablja postopek s pogajanji, pri čemer se morajo potekati posvetovanja z najmanj petimi kandidati.
A negotiated procedure with consultation of at least five candidates may be used for contracts with a value less than or equal to EUR 80 000 .
Za naročila v vrednosti, ki je manjša od ali enaka 50.000 EUR, se lahko uporabi postopek iz odstavka 1 z izvedbo posvetovanj z najmanj tremi kandidati.
For contracts with a value less than or equal to EUR 50 000 , the procedure referred to in paragraph 1 with consultation of at least three candidates may be used.
Naročila, katerih vrednost je manjša od 3 500 EUR, se lahko oddajo na podlagi ene same ponudbe.
Contracts with a value less than or equal to EUR 3 500 may be awarded on the basis of a single tender.
Naročila, katerih vrednost je manjša od 12.500 EUR, se lahko oddajo na podlagi ene same ponudbe.
Contracts with a value less than or equal to EUR 12 500 may be awarded on the basis of a single tender.
Plačila glede na odhodkovne postavke v vrednosti, ki je manjša kot ali enaka 200 EUR, se lahko poravnajo enostavno kot plačila po računih brez predhodnega sprejema ponudbe.“
Payments in respect of items of expenditure for an amount less than or equal to EUR 200 may consist simply in payment against invoices, without prior acceptance of a tender.
Plačila glede na odhodkovne postavke v vrednosti, ki je manjša kot ali enaka 1000 EUR, se lahko poravnajo enostavno kot plačila po računih brez predhodnega sprejema ponudbe.“
Payments in respect of items of expenditure for an amount less than or equal to EUR 1 000 may consist simply in payment against invoices, without prior acceptance of a tender.
Naročila ne smejo biti razdeljena na posamezne dele, če to vodi v neupoštevanje navedenih začetnih vrednosti.
Contracts may not be divided into individual lots if this results in circumvention of the thresholds set out.
Predlog spremembe povečuje hitrost in administrativno prilagodljivost postopkov ter zmanjšuje prekomerno administrativno obremenjenost.
Increase speediness and administrative flexibility of procedures, reduce excessive administrative burden.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 38 (A)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 38 (A)
Člen 134, odstavek 2 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 134, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
a) V odstavku 2 se črta drugi pododstavek .
(a) In paragraph 2 , the second subparagraph is deleted.
(a) Odstavek 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(a) paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
Kadar zadevna država ne izda dokumenta ali potrdila iz odstavka 1 ter za ostale primere izločitve iz členov 93 in 94 Finančne uredbe, se ta lahko nadomesti z izjavo pod prisego ali, če to ni mogoče, slovesno izjavo zainteresirane stranke pred sodnim ali upravnim organom, notarjem ali usposobljenim strokovnim organom v njegovi matični državi ali državi porekla.
Where the document or certificate referred to in paragraph 1 is not issued in the country co n cerned and for the other cases of exclusion referred to in Articles 93 and 94 of the Financial Reg u lation, it may be replaced by a sworn or, failing that, a solemn statement made by the interested party before a judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a qualified professional body in his country of origin or provenance.
Za naročila, katerih vrednost je manjša od 80.000 EUR, lahko naročnik na podlagi lastne analize tveganj od kandidatov ali ponudnikov zahteva le častno izjavo, s katero potrjujejo, da zanje ne veljajo primeri iz členov 93 in 94 Finančne uredbe.
For contracts with a value of less than EUR 80 000, the contrac t ing authority may, depending on its analysis of risks, ask candidates or tenderers to provide only a declaration on their honour that they are not in one of the situations referred to in Articles 93 and 94 of the Financial Regulation.
Za naročila, katerih vrednost je manjša od 5.000 EUR, lahko naročnik glede na oceno tveganja, odda javno naročilo, ne da bi zahteval častno izjavo.
For contracts with a value of less than EUR 5 000, the contrac t ing authority may, depending on its analysis of risks, award the contract without demanding a declaration on the honour.
Zahteva po obvezni častni izjavi lahko ima nezaželene posledice, ko je vrednost naročila nizka (predvsem pri manj pomembnih storitvah/dostavah).
The mandatory requirement of a declaration on the honour may lead to undesired consequences where the value of the contract is low (in particular minor services / supplies).
V teh primerih se lahko odredbodajalec odloči, ali bo izjavo zahteval ali ne.
In these cases it shall be at the authorising officer’s discretion on whether to demand a declaration or to refrain from demanding one.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 39 (B)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 39 (B)
Člen 135, odstavek 6 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2324/2002)
Article 135, paragraph 6 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2324/2002)
Naročnik se lahko v primeru naslednjih naročil glede na svojo oceno tveganja odloči, da ne bo zahteval dokazila finančne, poslovne, tehnične in strokovne usposobljenosti kandidatov ali ponudnikov:
The contracting authority may, depending on his assessment of the risks, decide not to require proof of the financial, economic, technical and professional capacity of candidates or tenderers in the case of the following contracts:
(a) naročila, ki jih samostojno oddajo institucije, v vrednosti, ki je manjša od ali enaka 60 000 EUR,
(a) contracts awarded by the institutions on their own account, with a value of less than or equal to EUR 60,000 ,
(a) naročila, ki jih samostojno oddajo institucije, v vrednosti, ki je manjša od ali enaka 80.000 EUR,
(a) contracts awarded by the institutions on their own account, with a value of less than or equal to EUR 80 000 ,