natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Parlamentarna imuniteta služi zaščiti svobode mnenj in svobode politične razprave poslancev.
Parliamentary immunity serves to protect the freedom of speech and the freedom of political debate of Parliament's Members.
V skladu s tem je zadevni parlamentarni odbor vedno dosledno menil, da bi bilo treba poslansko imuniteto vedno priznati v tistih primerih, ko dejanja, katerih dolžijo poslanca, sodijo k opravljanju njegovih političnih dejavnosti oziroma so s temi dejavnostmi neposredno povezana.
Accordingly, Parliament’s relevant committee has always held the consistent view that on principle a Member’s immunity should on no account be waived if the acts with which he/she is charged form part of his/her political activities or are immediately linked to such activities.
K temu sodijo na primer izražanje mnenja, pri čemer se predpostavlja, da le-ta spadajo k poslančevim političnim dejavnostim, recimo na protestih, pri javnih shodih, v političnih publikacijah, v tisku, v knjigi, na televiziji, med podpisovanjem političnega dokumenta in tudi pred sodiščem.
This covers, among other things, expressions of opinion which may be deemed to form part of a Member’s political activity, for example at demonstrations, at public meetings, in the press, in a book, on TV, by signing a political document, or in court.
Poleg tega načela so še druga razmišljanja, ki govorijo proti priznanju imunitete oziroma za priznanje, zlasti tista v zvezi z načelom " fumus persecutionis ", t.j. domnevo, da je namen kazenskega postopka škodovati političnim dejavnostim poslanca.
In addition to this principle, other considerations which may argue for or against the waiver of immunity also need to be taken into account, particularly in connection with tendentious prosecution (“ fumus persecutionis” ) , i.e. the suspicion that the prosecution has been brought with the intention of causing political damage to the Member.
V skladu z opredelitvijo iz Donnezovega poročila koncept " fumus persecutionis " pomeni v bistvu, da se imuniteta prizna, če obstaja domneva, da je namen kazenskega postopka škodovati političnim dejavnostim poslanca.
In accordance with the definition of “fumus persecutionis” in the explanatory statement of the Donnez report, the term essentially means that immunity will not be lifted if there is reason to believe that the prosecution has been brought with the intention of causing the Member political damage.
Če je sodni postopek začel recimo poslančev politični nasprotnik, se bo imuniteta, razen če se mu ne dokaže nasprotno, poslancu priznala, če se zdi, da je namen obtožbe zadevnemu poslancu škodovati, ne pa pridobiti odškodnino za nastalo škodo.
If, for example, court proceedings are brought by a political opponent, immunity will not, failing evidence to the contrary, be waived if the charge seems to be intended to cause the Member harm rather than to obtain reparation for damages.
Prav tako se imuniteta prizna, če je bil sodni postopek sprožen v okoliščinah, zaradi katerih je verjetno, da je bil postopek vložen samo z namenom škodovati zadevnemu poslancu.
Similarly, immunity is also not waived if court proceedings have been brought under circumstances which make it likely that they were brought solely with a view to causing damage to the Member in question.
UTEMELJITEV PREDLOGA SKLEPA
GROUNDS FOR THE PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION
V odboru za pravne zadeve je bila o členih 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah, ki se navezujeta za ta primer, opravljena temeljita razprava.
The Committee on Legal Affairs has discussed in detail Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities which are relevant here.
Odbor je naprej raziskal, če je člen 9 Protokola relevanten za ta primer.
The committee first investigated the relevance of Article 9.
Borghezio je izjavil, da s tem, ko je s sprejem napisal besedo "sramota" na pločnik sodne palače, izrazil svoje mnenje, ki naj bi bilo povezano z njegovimi obveznostmi, ki jih ima kot poslanec Evropskega parlamenta.
Mr Borghezio claimed that, by spraying the word “disgrace” on the pavement outside the Palace of Justice, he was expressing an opinion linked to his office as a Member of the European Parliament.
Pisanje besed z barvnim sprejem je lahko tudi izražanje mnenja, vendar pri tem ne gre za izražanje mnenja, temveč zgolj za poškodovanje tuje stvari, kar je povzročil sprej na pločniku.
The spraying of words with a spray paint may also be an expression of opinion: however, it is not the expression of opinion which is at issue here but the actual damage caused by the spray to the pavement.
Tu gre torej za spremljajoče okoliščine izražanja mnenja, katerega posledica je bilo lahko poškodovanje tuje stvari.
In other words, what is at issue are the circumstances surrounding this expression of opinion which may have resulted in criminal damage.
Kar zadeva uporabo črke a člena 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah, se zdi, da ni razloga za domnevo, da gre za " fumus persecutionis ".
As regards the applicability of Article 10(a) of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities, there does not seem to be any reason to suspect tendentious prosecution ( fumus persecutionis ) .
Lahko izhajamo iz tega, da bi v podobnih okoliščinah preganjali tudi katerega koli drugega italijanskega državljana, ki bi pisal s sprejem.
It may be assumed that any other Italian citizen who had expressed his opinion using a spray paint can under similar circumstances would also have been prosecuted.
Tudi ni nobenih indicev, da gre le za banalno zadevo, ki bi prišla do kazenskega sodišča.
Nor is there any evidence to suggest that this is too trivial a matter to have come before the criminal courts.
Po drugem odstavku člena 7 poslovnika predlog sklepa odbora zgolj priporoči priznanje ali nepriznanje zahteve po zaščiti imunitete in privilegijev.
Under the terms of Rule 7(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the proposal for a decision of the committee should simply recommend the adoption or rejection of the request for the defence of immunity and privileges.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Norveško o popravku zneska finančnega prispevka Norveške, predvidenega v Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Norveško o udeležbi Norveške pri delu Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami (EMCDDA)
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the agreement between the European Community and Norway on the revision of the amount of the financial contribution from Norway provided for in the agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway on the participation of Norway in the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2006)0115 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0115 )
– ob upoštevanju osnutka Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Norveško o popravku zneska finančnega prispevka Norveške, predvidenega v Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Norveško o udeležbi Norveške pri delu Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami (EMCDDA),
– having regard to the draft agreement between the European Community and Norway on the revision of the amount of the financial contribution from Norway provided for in the agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway on the participation of Norway in the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA),
– ob upoštevanju člena 152 in prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 152 and 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0140/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0140/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0330/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0330/2006 ),
Člen 13 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 302/93 z dne 8. februarja 1993 o ustanovitvi Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in odvisnosti
Article 13 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 302/93 of 8 February 1993 on the establishment of a European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction
1. , kakor je bila spremenjena z uredbami Sveta (ES) št. 3294/94
1. , as amended by Council Regulations (EC) Nos 3294/94
UL L 341, 30.12.1994, str.
OJ L 341, 30.12.1994, p.
1. in 1651/2003
1. and 1651/2003
30. , omogoča državam, ki niso članice Skupnosti, da sodelujejo pri delu EMCDDA.
30. , allows non‑Community countries to take part in the work of the EMCDDA.
Sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Norveško o udeležbi Norveške pri delu EMCDDA je bil podpisan 19. oktobra 2000 in je začel veljati 1. januarja 2001
An agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway on the participation of Norway in the work of the EMCDDA was signed on 19 October 2000 and entered into force on 1 January 2001
UL L 257, 11.10.2000, str.
OJ L 257, 11.10.2000, p.
Člen 5 tega sporazuma določa finančni prispevek Norveške k delu EMCDDA.
Article 5 of this agreement sets out the financial contribution from Norway to the work of the EMCDDA.
Po širitvi Evropske unije je Norveška zahtevala pregled svojega finančnega prispevka k delu EMCDDA.
Following the enlargement of the European Union, Norway has requested the revision of its financial contribution to the work of the EMCDDA.
Cilj tega predloga sklepa Sveta je torej pregled zneska finančnega prispevka Norveške in določitev formule za izračun prispevka Norveške, ki se bo upoštevala ob mogočih prihodnjih širitvah Evropske unije in tako preprečila nadaljnje spremembe.
The present proposal for a Council decision aims thus at revising the amount of the financial contribution from Norway and sets up a formula for the calculation of Norway’s contribution to take account of possible future enlargements of the European Union and avoid further adjustments.
Priporočilo poročevalke
Recommendation of the Rapporteur
Poročevalka podpira sporazum, ki je bil dosežen med Norveško in Evropsko unijo.
Your rapporteur supports the agreement reached between Norway and the European Union.
V prejšnjem sporazumu je bilo dogovorjeno, da Norveška plača EMCDDA poseben odstotek evropske subvencije.
Under the previous agreement, it was agreed that Norway would pay a specific percentage of the European subsidy to the EMCDDA.
V novem sporazumu so se pogodbenice odločile za formulo za izračun, ki omogoča prilagajanje prispevka Norveške glede na širitev Unije.
Under the new agreement, the parties have opted for a calculation formula that allows Norway's contribution to be adjusted as the Union is enlarged.
Sporazum določa tudi najmanjši znesek, ki ga je treba ne glede na število držav članic Unije upoštevati, in sicer mora biti finančni prispevek vsaj 271 000 EUR.
The agreement also lays down a minimum amount which must be adhered to irrespective of the number of Member States of the Union, namely a financial contribution of not less than EUR 271 000.
Ta znesek ustreza strošku širitve na državo, kot je leta 2001 ocenil EMCDDA.
This amount corresponds to the cost of enlargement per country as estimated by the EMCDDA in 2001.
Ti ukrepi preprečujejo potrebo po sklepanju novega sporazuma ob vsaki širitvi Unije.
These arrangements avoid the need for a new agreement to be concluded each time the Union is enlarged.
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Norveško o popravku zneska finančnega prispevka Norveške, predvidenega v Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Norveško o udeležbi Norveške pri delu Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami (EMCDDA)
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the agreement between the European Community and Norway on the revision of the amount of the financial contribution from Norway provided for in the agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway on the participation of Norway in the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o uporabi tujih in lokalno neprisotnih vrst v ribogojstvu
on the proposal for a Council regulation concerning use of alien and locally absent species in aquaculture
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0154 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0154 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0137/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0137/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0331/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0331/2006 ),
(5a) Ribogojstvo ni edini vir potencialnega razširjanja tujih vrst v vodnem mediju.
(5a) Aquaculture is not the only source of potential dissemination of alien species in the aquatic medium.
Druge dejavnosti, kot so med drugim uporaba balastnih vod in trgovina z okrasnimi ribami, morda predstavljajo večje okoljsko tveganje in zahtevajo posebne upravljalne ukrepe.
Other activities, such as, inter alia, the use of ballast water and trade in ornamental fish, are possibly more significant in terms of environmental risk and require special management measures.
Razviti je treba obsežne strategije, ki bodo celovito obravnavale problem tujih vrst.
Comprehensive strategies should be developed to deal with the problem of alien species in an integrated fashion.
Dokler pa se taka strategija ne izvaja, je primerno sprejeti sektorske ukrepe, kot so ti, predlagani v tej uredbi.
However, until such a strategy is implemented, it is appropriate to adopt sectoral measures such as the ones proposed in this Regulation.
Ker je narava okoljskih nevarnosti zelo raznolika, zlasti v sektorskih industrijskih dejavnostih, ki so lahko vir takih nevarnosti, je treba razviti obsežne in celovite strategije, ki bodo obravnavale vprašanje razširjanja tujih vrst v vodnem mediju.
As the environmental threats are very varied in nature, and especially in the kind of sectorial industrial activity which may be the source of such threats, comprehensive and integrated strategies should be developed to treat the issue of dissemination of alien species in the aquatic medium.
(5b) Treba je razviti posebne strategije za preprečevanje vnosa genetsko spremenjenih vrst v ribogojski sektor EU in za nadzor premika oplojenih jajčec.
(5b) Specific strategies should be developed to counter the introduction of genetically modified species into the EU's fish farming sector and to control the movement of fertilised eggs.
Treba je preprečiti, da bi genetsko spremenjene ribe ušle v morsko okolje ter se drstile z avtohtonimi vrstami.
It is necessary to guard against the possibility of genetically-modified fish escaping into the marine environment and breeding with indigenous species.
Nujno je treba tudi zagotoviti, da se uredba razširi na uvoz iz držav izven EU ter na premik oplojenih jajčec v EU.
It is also essential to ensure that the regulation is extended to cover the importation from out with the EU and the movement within the EU of fertilized ova.
Poleg tega lahko praksa premikanja mladih tunov z ribolovnih območij na oddaljene lokacije za gojenje poveča možna tveganja v smislu te uredbe.
In addition, the practice of moving juvenile tuna from fish grounds to distant locations for ranching may give rise to potential threats under the terms of this regulation.
(8a) Upoštevati je treba, da premiki tujih ali lokalno neprisotnih vrst, ki se bodo nahajale v zaprtih ribogojskih objektih, ki so varni in pri katerih je tveganje za pobeg majhno, praviloma ne bi smele biti predmet nobene predhodne ocene tveganja za okolje.
(8a) It should be taken into account that movements of alien or locally absent species to be held in closed aquaculture facilities which are secure and which present a very low risk of escape should not normally be subject to any prior environmental risk assessment.
(9a) Nekatere tuje vrste se v ribogojstvu že dolgo splošno uporabljajo in izkušnje kažejo, da je z njimi povezano okoljsko tveganje minimalno.
(9a) Some alien species have commonly been used in aquaculture for a long time and experience has shown that the associated environmental risk is minimal.
Dejavnosti, ki so vezane nanje, bi zato morale biti deležne diferencirane obravnave, ki bi olajšala njihov razvoj brez dodatnih upravnih bremen.
The activities connected therewith should therefore benefit from a differential treatment facilitating their development without any additional administrative burden.
Tuje vrste, ki so že dolgo prisotne in zelo razširjene v Skupnosti, je treba drugače obravnavati, če nimajo znanih škodljivih vplivov.
Non-indigenous species that are long established and widespread in the Community should be dealt with differently, provided that they produce no known harmful effects.
(9b) Treba je predvideti primerno obdobje prilagajanja med začetkom vstopa v veljavo in začetkom izvajanja te uredbe, če upoštevamo finančne in institucionalne posledice za zainteresirane strani.
(9b) There should be an adequate transition period between the entry into force and the implementation of this Regulation, in view of the financial and institutional implications for the parties concerned.
Člen 2, odstavek 4 a (novo)
Article 2, paragraph 4 a (new)
Ta uredba upošteva dejstvo, da je pri zaprtih ribogojskih objektih, kot so opredeljeni v točki 3 člena 3, tveganje za pobeg manjše.
This Regulation shall take into account the fact that closed aquaculture facilities, as defined in Article 3, point 3, present a lower risk of escape.
Kopenski, zaprti ribogojski sistemi s kroženjem vode so biološko zelo varni.
Land-based, indoor, recirculation aquaculture systems are very bio-secure.
Tveganje za pobeg gojenih organizmov iz takih sistemov je zanemarljivo
The risk for escape of aquaculture organisms from these systems is negligible
Scientific report Consensus Working Group on Recirculation Systems, avtorji Verreth, Martins, Eding in Scheinder (2005). .
Scientific report Consensus Working Group on Recirculation Systems by Verreth, Martins, Eding and Scheinder (2005). .
Poleg tega objekti delujejo neodvisno od odprtih vodnih virov.
Furthermore, these facilities operate independently from open water sources.
Ta uredba, razen členov 3 in 4, se ne uporablja za vrste, ki se v ribogojstvu splošno uporabljajo že več kot 30 let in pri katerih se je izkazalo, da pobeg v naravo ne predstavlja okoljske nevarnosti.
This Regulation, except for Articles 3 and 4, shall not apply to species which have commonly been used in aquaculture for more than 30 years and for which escape to the wild has been proven not to represent an environmental hazard.
Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 30(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002 in na osnovi znanstvenih spoznanj določi seznam takih vrst pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe.
The Commission, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 30(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 and on the basis of scientific knowledge, shall establish the list of such species before the entry into force of this Regulation.
Nekatere tuje vrste, ki so bile prinesene v Evropo pred desetletji, so sedaj zelo razširjene in so med običajno uporabljenimi vrstami v ribogojstvu Skupnosti (npr.:šarenka, pacifiška ostriga, krap).
Some non-indigenous species introduced decades ago in Europe are now very widespread and are some of the species traditionally used in aquaculture in the Community (e.g. the rainbow trout, the Pacific oyster and carp).
Te vrste morajo biti načeloma izvzete iz izvajanja te uredbe, če nimajo znanih škodljivih vplivov.
These species should in principle be exempt from the provisions of this regulation provided they do not produce any known harmful effects.
Države članice določijo pristojne organe, odgovorne za zagotovitev skladnosti z zahtevami te uredbe („pristojni organi“).
Member States shall designate the competent authority responsible for ensuring compliance with the requirements of this Regulation (‘the competent authority’).
Vsak pristojni organ imenuje svetovalni odbor, ki mu pomaga in vključuje ustrezne strokovnjake s področij biologije in ekologije („svetovalni odbor“).
Each competent authority shall appoint to assist it an advisory committee, which shall include appropriate biological and ecological expertise (‘the advisory committee’).
Kjer je pristojnost glede upravljanja ribogojskih dejavnosti prenešena na regionalne ali podregionalne organe, smejo zgoraj navedene pristojne organe in svetovalne odbore določiti omenjeni regionalni ali podregionalni organi.
Where competence in respect of the management of aquaculture activities has been delegated to regional or sub-regional bodies, such competent authorities and advisory committees may be designated by those regional or sub-regional bodies.
Ta predlog spremembe naj bi v nekaterih državah članicah omogočil obstoj različnih pristojnih organov in svetovalnih odborov glede na njihove institucionalne in regionalne strukture.
This amendment aims to allow the existence of several competent authorities and advisory committees in some Member States, on the basis of their institutional and regional structures.
Vsakdo, ki namerava vnesti ali prenesti vodni organizem, vloži zahtevek za dovoljenje pri pristojnemu organu države članice prejemnice.
Anyone intending to undertake the introduction or translocation of an aquatic organism shall apply for a permit from the competent authority of the receiving Member State.
Zahtevke se lahko vloži za več premikov, ki se izvedejo v obdobju največ pet let.
Applications may be submitted for multiple movements to take place over a period of not longer than five years.
Zahtevke se lahko vloži za več premikov, ki se izvedejo v obdobju največ sedmih let.
Applications may be submitted for multiple movements to take place over a period of not longer than seven years.
Najdaljše obdobje petih let je nezadostno in ne upošteva razmnoževalnega cikla nekaterih vrst ter potrebnega časa za amortizacijo zahtevanih investicij.
The five-year maximum period is too short and does not take account of the reproductive cycles of some species and the time needed to recoup the investment required.
Prosilca se o odločitvi za izdajo ali zavrnitev dovoljenja pisno obvesti v razumnem času, vendar ne kasneje od enega leta po vložitvi prošnje.
The applicant shall be informed in writing of the decision to issue or refuse a permit within a reasonable time and in any case not later than one year from the date of the submission of the application.
Prosilca se o odločitvi za izdajo ali zavrnitev dovoljenja pisno obvesti v razumnem času, vendar ne kasneje od šestih mesecev po vložitvi prošnje.
The applicant shall be informed in writing of the decision to issue or refuse a permit within a reasonable time and in any case not later than six months from the date of the submission of the application.
Rok enega leta je pretiran, nerazumen in ne ustreza potrebam sektorja.
A one-year deadline is too long, cannot be considered reasonable and does not address the sector's needs.
Pristojni organ lahko dovoljenje kadar koli odvzame, če pride do nepredvidenih dogodkov z negativnimi učinki na okolje ali avtohtone populacije.
At any point in time the Competent Authority can withdraw the permit if unforeseen events with negative effects on the environment or on native populations occur.
Vsak odvzem dovoljenja mora biti znanstveno utemeljen.
Any withdrawal of a permit must be justified on scientific grounds.
Če pristojni organ odvzame dovoljenje, mora to temeljiti na znanstvenih podatkih.
If the Competent Authority withdraws the permit, it has to be based on scientific information.
Uporablja se od ...*
It shall apply from...*
* Dvanajst mesecev po začetku njene veljavnosti.
* Twelve months following the date of its entry into force.