natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poenostavljeni postopki in manjše zamude pri izbiri predlogov bodo spodbudili prizadevanja za približanje Evrope državljanom.
Simplified procedures and shorter delays for the selection of proposals will support the efforts of bringing Europe closer to the citizens.
Nova generacija večletnih programov 2007–2013 upošteva pripombe, ki že več let opozarjajo, da je treba poenostaviti programe.
The new generation of multi-annual programmes 2007 -2013 takes into account the remarks made over a number of years as regards the need to simplify the programmes.
Pripravljavka mnenja poudarja, da obstaja določeno neskladje med priporočilom Sodišča o obsežnejši uporabi pavšalnega financiranja (na primer povprečni stroški osebja) in kritikami, da zaradi tovrstnega financiranja dejanski stroški odstopajo od povprečnih stroškov.
The draftswoman emphasises that there is a certain tension between the recommendation of the Court on making more extensive use of lump sum financing (e.g. average personnel costs) and its criticism that actual costs deviate from average costs.
Odgovor Komisije se zdi utemeljen: povprečne stopnje je treba izračunati po dosledni metodologiji, ki ne ustvarja sistematično višjih povprečnih stroškov (odstavek 7.6).
The Commission reply to this seems valid: the calculation of average rates must be done according to a consistent methodology which does not give rise to systematically higher average costs (paragraph 7.6).
Del programov se izvaja prek nacionalnih agencij .
Parts of the programmes are implemented through national agencies .
Več kot 60 % sredstev proračuna GD za izobraževanje in kulturo prejemniki dobijo prek nacionalnih agencij.
Over 60% of the budget of DG Education and Culture is channelled to recipients via national agencies.
V Evropski uniji je 99 takšnih agencij.
In total 99 of such agencies exist in the EU.
Računovodski sistemi nekaterih agencij imajo precejšnje pomanjkljivosti.
Some of those agencies have shown considerable weaknesses in their accounting systems.
GD za izobraževanje in kulturo v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih navaja, da so bile do leta 2005 opravljene revizije pri 75 od 99 nacionalnih agencij, do konca leta 2006 pa naj bi bile revidirane vse agencije.
DG EAC states in its annual activity report that 75 out of 99 national agencies had been subject to an audit by the end of 2005 and that all agencies should be audited by the end of 2006.
Kljub temu izraža pridržek glede upravljanja programov s strani nacionalnih agencij.
Nevertheless, it makes a reservation as regards the management of the programmes by national agencies.
Tudi revidirana finančna uredba namenja večjo pozornost odgovornosti držav članic za programe v okviru deljenega upravljanja v zvezi z uspešnostjo in učinkovitostjo kontrolnih sistemov in izterjav.
The revised Financial Regulation, too, puts more emphasis on Member States' responsibilities for programmes under shared management as regards effective and efficient control systems and recoveries.
Kot odgovor na te pomanjkljivosti se lahko prenos nalog na nacionalne agencije postavi pod vprašaj, če v naslednjih letih ne zagotovijo boljšega izvajanja in nadzora nad proračunom.
In order to react to these shortcomings it could ultimately be envisaged to reconsider delegating tasks to the national agencies, if in the course of a couple of years these national agencies cannot provide for better implementation and control of the budget.
GD za izobraževanje in kulturo je bil v letu 2005 notranje reorganiziran, del njegovih dejavnosti pa je bil prenesen na GD za informacijsko družbo in medije (mediji in avdiovizualna politika).
DG EAC in 2005 faced an internal reorganisation and parts of its activities were transferred to DG INFSO (media and audiovisual policy).
Poleg tega je bila ustanovljena Izvajalska agencija za izobraževanje, avdiovizualno in kulturo , zato je bilo potrebno oceniti 7000 možnih kandidatov in prenesti 13.000 pogodb.
Furthermore the executive agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture (EACEA) was set up, which involved the examination of 7.000 potential candidates and the transfer of 13.000 contracts.
Ti obsežni postopki so gotovo vplivali na vodenje dejavnosti generalnega direktorata.
This complex operation certainly affected the way the DG runs its activities.
Komisija odgovarja, da mora glede na zelo visoke stroške revizije vsakega projekta na kraju samem dopustiti določeno možnost nastanka napak, če je ta sorazmerna z naravo dodeljene pomoči.
The Commission replies that given the prohibitive costs of auditing every project on the spot the Commission must tolerate a certain risk of error, provided that this risk is commensurate with the nature of the aid granted.
S tem v zvezi GD za izobraževanje in kulturo v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih navaja, da je analiza zaključkov revizij, ki so bile opravljene v zadnjih treh letih, pokazala 9-odstotno povprečno stopnjo napake , ki se v glavnem pojavlja v delih programov z višjo stopnjo tveganja, kot so na primer nadnacionalni programi.
In this respect the annual activity report of DG EAC states that an analysis of the conclusions of audits finalised over the last three years shows an average rate of error of 9% , mainly relating to parts of the programmes that present a higher risk, such as transnational programmes.
Tovrstne napake se dogajajo zlasti pri programih z visokim deležem stroškov za osebje, kjer se v primeru revizij del stroškov pogosto ne povrne zaradi pomanjkanja dokazil, kot so na primer preglednice prihodov na delo in odhodov z dela (na to težavo Računsko sodišče opozarja v odst.
Such errors occur notably in programmes which include an important part of personnel costs where it is not seldom that in case of audits part of the costs are not reimbursed because of the lack of supporting evidence, such as time sheets (a problem observed by the Court as well in para 7.29).
Glede dejavnosti GD za komuniciranje v letu 2005 je treba poudariti, da bi morali partnerstva na področju upravljanja med Komisijo in nacionalnimi upravami uporabiti za dodatne informacijske dejavnosti v državah članicah.
With respect to the activities of DG COMM in 2005, it should be stressed that the management partnerships between the Commission and national administrations should be used for additional information exercises in Member States.
Komisija se mora izogniti razmeram, podobnim tistim v Nemčiji , kjer so se nacionalna sredstva za informacijske ukrepe EU po ustanovitvi partnerstva občutno zmanjšala.
The Commission needs to avoid a situation like that in Germany where national funds for EU information measures have significantly decreased following the establishment of the partnership.
Razrešnica glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005 - Oddelek III - Komisija
Discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005 - Section III - Commission
o razrešnici za izvrševanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005
on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general Budget for the financial year 2005
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Razrešnica za izvrševanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005
Discharge for implementation of the European Union general Budget for the financial year 2005- Section III - Commission
Odbor za pravice žensk in enakost spolov poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. ponavlja svojo zahtevo, da morajo poročila o razrešnici za proračun vsebovati podatke o politikah enakosti spolov in podatke glede na spol; obžaluje, da Komisija ni posredovala teh informacij;
Repeats its demand for the information on gender mainstreaming policies and gender-specific data to be included in the budget discharge reports; regrets that the Commission has not supplied this information;
4. opozarja na pomanjkanje podatkov v zvezi z dejavnostmi, ki spodbujajo enakosti spolov in so prejele pomoč iz strukturnih skladov, ter poziva Komisijo, da izboljša ta položaj;
Draws attention to the absence of data relating to activities promoting gender equality that have received Structural Fund support and calls on the Commission to remedy this situation;
Razrešnica glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005
Discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005 - Section III - Commission
členi 274, 275, 276 EC in 179a, 180b Euratom
Articles 274, 275, 276 EC and 179a, 180b Euratom
člen 70 in priloga V
Rule 70 and Annex V
Edit Herczog 20.4.2006
Salvador Garriga Polledo 20.4.2006
Nadomeščeni poročevalec(-ka)
Previous rapporteur
o prispevanju prihodnje regionalne politike k inovativni zmogljivosti Evropske Unije
on the contribution of the future regional policy to the innovative capacity of the European Union
– ob upoštevanju členov 2, 3, 158, 159 in 160 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,
– having regard to Articles 2, 3, 158, 159 and 160 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
25. ter popravka
25. and to the corrigendum thereto
UL L 239, 1.9.2006, str.
OJ L 239, 1.9.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta št. 1084/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o ustanovitvi Kohezijskega sklada
– having regard to Council Regulation No 1084/2006 of 11 July 2006 establishing a Cohesion Fund
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1080/2006 z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the European Regional Development Fund
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1081/2006 z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem socialnem skladu
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the European Social Fund
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1082/2006 z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropski skupini za ozemeljsko sodelovanje
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC)
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2006/702/ES z dne 6. oktobra 2006 o strateških smernicah Skupnosti o koheziji
– having regard to Council Decision 2006/702/EC of 6 October 2006 on Community strategic guidelines on cohesion
UL L 291, 21.10.2006, str.
OJ L 291, 21.10.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1982/2006 z dne 18. decembra 2006 o Sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007 do 2013)
– having regard to Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013)
UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str.
OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 1639/2006/ES z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o ustanovitvi Okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost (2007–2013)
– having regard to Decision No 1639/2006/ΕC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing an Innovation and Competitiveness Framework Programme (2007-2013)
UL L 310, 9.11.2006, str.
OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2005 o znanosti in tehnologiji - smernice za prihodnjo politiko Evropske unije za podporo raziskovanju
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2005 on science and technology - Guidelines for future European Union policy to support research
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Kohezijska politika za podporo rasti in novim delovnim mestom: strateške smernice Skupnosti, 2007–2013 ( KOM(2005)0299 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013' ( COM(2005)0299 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom Prenos znanja v prakso: široko zastavljena inovacijska strategija za EU ( KOM(2006)0502 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled 'Putting knowledge into practice: A broad-based innovation strategy for the EU' ( COM(2006)0502 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom Več raziskav in inovacij - naložba za rast in zaposlovanje: skupni pristop ( KOM(2005)0488 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled 'More Research and Innovation - Investing for Growth and Employment: A Common Approach' ( COM(2005)0488 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskem parlamentu z naslovom Kohezijska politika in mesta: prispevek mest k rasti in delovnim mestom v regijah ( KOM(2006)0385 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and Parliament entitled 'Cohesion Policy and cities: the urban contribution to growth and jobs in the regions' ( COM(2006)0385 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Tretje poročilo o napredku glede kohezije: k novemu partnerstvu za rast, delovna mesta in kohezijo ( KOM(2005)0192 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Third progress report on cohesion: Towards a new partnership for growth, jobs and cohesion' ( COM(2005)0192 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta iz Lizbone z dne 23. in 24. marca 2000,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000,
- ob upoštevanju Evropske listine za mala podjetja, ki je bila potrjena na vrhu Evropskega sveta v Feiri 19. in 20. junija 2000,
- having regard to the European Charter for Small Enterprises, approved at the Feira European Council on 19-20 June 2000,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu svetu na neuradnem srečanju v Lahtiju 20. oktobra 2006 z naslovom Inovacijam prijazna, sodobna Evropa ( KOM(2006)0589 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Council at the informal meeting in Lahti on 20 October 2006, entitled 'An innovation-friendly, modern Europe' ( COM(2006)0589 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu svetu z naslovom Evropski tehnološki inštitut: nadaljnji koraki v zvezi z njegovo ustanovitvijo ( KOM(2006)0276 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Council entitled 'The European Institute of Technology: further steps towards its creation' ( COM(2006)0276 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Regije za gospodarsko spremembo ( KOM(2006)0675 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Regions for Economic Change' ( COM(2006)0675 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila, ki ga je za Komisijo pripravila neodvisna skupina strokovnjakov za raziskave in razvoj pod vodstvom Eska Aha, z naslovom „Ustvarjati inovativno Evropo” z januarja 2006, končnega poročila evropskega svetovalnega odbora za raziskave z naslovom „Spodbujanje regionalnih možnosti za raziskave in razvoj” z novembra 2005 in poročila Komisije „Inovacijske strategije in ukrepi: rezultat petnajstih let regionalnih izkušenj” z oktobra 2005,
– having regard to the report to the Commission by the independent group of experts on R&D led by Esko Aho entitled 'Creating an Innovative Europe' (January 2006), the final report of the European Research Advisory Board (ERAB) entitled 'Stimulating regional potential for research and innovation' (November 2005) and the Commission report 'Innovative strategies and actions: results of 15 years of regional experience' (October 2005),
– ob upoštevanju evropskega poročila o napredku na področju inovacij 2006 (TrendChart),
– having regard to the European Innovation Progress Report 2006 (TrendChart),
– ob upoštevanju stališč in mnenj Odbora regij,
– having regard to the positions and opinions of the Committee of the Regions,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj in mnenja Odbora za proračun (A6–( A6‑0096/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0096/2007 ),
A. ker ima regionalna politika poleg odobravanja projektov in upravljanja strukturnih skladov vlogo tudi pri vzpostavljanju inovativne zmogljivosti EU, kar zajema spekter dodatnih znanstvenih, tehnoloških, pravnih, finančnih, gospodarskih, trgovinskih, organizacijskih, upravnih, energetskih, okoljskih, izobraževalnih, družbenih ter zdravstvenih in kulturnih ukrepov, usmerjenih v zagotavljanje resnične kohezije znotraj Skupnosti,
A. whereas, in addition to covering the approval of projects and the management of Structural Funds, regional policy plays a part in EU innovation capacity building, which involves a range of complementary scientific and technological, legal and financial, economic and commercial, organisational and administrative, energy and environmental, educational and social, and health and cultural measures aimed at securing genuine cohesion within the Community,
B. ker naložbe same po sebi ne zagotavljajo razvoja, vendar ob izvajanju ustrezne politike in ob podpiranju ukrepov za spodbujanje rasti lahko postanejo ključno razvojno orodje,
B. whereas investment does not, of itself, guarantee development but can, when appropriate policies are pursued and pro-growth measures supported, become a vital development tool,
C. ker bi moralo vzpostavljanje inovativne zmogljivosti EU služiti za zmanjševanje razlik med regijami in na ta način uveljavljati načelo družbene solidarnosti in skladnega razvoja,
C. whereas innovation capacity building should serve to reduce disparities between regions, thereby putting into practice the principle of social solidarity and harmonious development,
D. ker bi morali ljudje biti v središču vseh inovacijskih dejavnosti; ker je poln in skladen razvoj teh dejavnosti ključen za uspešno izvajanje vseh politik in ker bi morala biti osnova celotnega delovanja EU blaginja njenih prebivalcev (širše opredeljena v smislu kakovosti in dolžine življenja) kot članov lokalnih in regionalnih skupnosti ter obenem državljanov držav članic,
D. whereas people should be the focus of all innovation action; whereas their full and harmonious development is the key to the successful implementation of all policies, and whereas the basis for all action taken by the EU should be the wellbeing of its inhabitants (broadly defined in terms of quality of life and long life), as members of local and regional communities and, at the same time, citizens of the Member States,
E. ker je enak dostop do izobrazbe in usposabljanja na vseh ravneh osnovna državljanska pravica in ker je treba pospešiti trajno izobraževanje in bi morali delavci imeti priložnost preusposabljanja,
E. whereas equal access to education and training at all levels is a fundamental citizens' right and whereas continuous training should be stepped up and workers should be given retraining opportunities,
F. ker bi morali inovacije znotraj Evropske unije razumeti kot dinamičen in interaktiven proces, ki vključuje številne interesne skupine, med njimi v skladu z načelom subsidiarnost regionalne in lokalne interesne skupine,
F. whereas innovation within the EU should be understood as a dynamic and interactive process involving various stakeholders including, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, regional and local stakeholders,
G. ker inovacija lahko pomeni tudi vrnitev k dobri, preizkušeni praksi, ki je v rabi že več generacij in ker so v nekaterih primerih inovativni ukrepi usmerjeni zgolj v specifične regije,
G. whereas innovation can also mean a return to good, tried and tested practices that have been in use for generations, and whereas in some cases innovation measures may be aimed only at specific regions,
H. ker nekateri ukrepi zahtevajo večje izdatke, medtem ko so za druge dovolj le nove ideje in/ali uvedba dobre, jasne zakonodaje, ki bo spoštovana,
H. whereas some measures require major expenditure, while others call only for new ideas and/or the introduction of good, clear legislation that will be observed,
I. ker je cilj lizbonske strategije, da EU do leta 2010 postane najbolj konkurenčno gospodarstvo na svetu, med drugim s pomočjo povečanja izdatkov za raziskave in razvoj na 3 % BDP, in ker bi morala biti regionalna in lokalna središča bolj aktivno vključena v praktično izvajanje lizbonske strategije,
I. whereas the goal of the Lisbon Strategy is to make the EU the world's most competitive economy by 2010, including by increasing research and development expenditure to 3% of GDP and whereas regional and local centres should be more actively involved in the practical implementation of the Lisbon Strategy,
J. ker se med 60 % in 70 % zakonodaje Skupnosti izvaja na regionalni in lokalni ravni,
J. whereas 60 to 70% of Community legislation is implemented at regional and local level,
K. ker bi morali biti strukturni skladi bolj prožni, da bi se lažje upoštevale posebnosti posameznih regij,
K. whereas Structural Funds should be used in a flexible way so as to enable due account to be taken of the specific features of individual regions,
L. ker so bili uvedeni različni finančni instrumenti, vključno z novimi pobudami Jaspers, Jeremie in Jessica, in ker dejavnost Evropske investicijske banke služi kot vzvod za razvoj prek racionalizacije stroškov,
L. whereas various financing instruments have been introduced, including the new Jaspers, Jeremie and Jessica initiatives, and whereas EIB action serves as a useful lever for development by rationalising expenditure,
M. ker igrajo majhna in srednje velika podjetja ključno vlogo pri vzpostavljanju inovativne zmogljivosti znotraj EU, med drugim zaradi prožnosti in hitrega odziva na nove tehnologije in načine delovanja,
M. whereas small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a vital role in innovation capacity building within the EU, owing, among other things, to their flexibility and speed of reaction to new technology and new operating methods,
N. ker je treba mala in srednje velika podjetja obravnavati kot eno izmed glavnih gonilnih sil za inovacije v Evropi in ker so države članice in Evropska unija zavezane h krepitvi inovacijskega duha in tehnoloških zmogljivosti v malih podjetjih ter k uvedbi patenta Skupnosti, ki bo za ta podjetja dostopen,
N. whereas SMEs must be considered as one of the main drivers for innovation in Europe and whereas the Member States and the EU are committed to strengthening the spirit of innovation in small enterprises and their technological capacities and to introducing a Community patent that is accessible to them,
O. ker predstavlja razvoj oskrbe s trajnostno energijo enega izmed največjih izzivov za EU,
O. whereas sustainable energy sector development represents one of the greatest challenges to the EU,
P. ker gospodarska dejavnost v širšem pomenu vključuje tudi kmetovanje,
P. whereas economic activity, as broadly understood, also includes farming,