natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
20. poudarja, da je pomembno, da države članice gostiteljice obdržijo pravico določanja minimalne plače v skladu s členom 3(1) direktive o napotitvi delavcev, vendar poziva tiste države članice, ki višino minimalnih plač določajo s kolektivnimi pogodbami, da s podjetji, ki želijo imeti sedež v drugi državi članici, spodbudijo dostop do informacij o višini minimalnih plač;
Underlines the importance of retaining the right for the host Member States to determine the minimum wage pursuant to Art 3(1) of the Posting of Workers Directive but calls on those Member States that set minimum wage rates by collective agreement, to facilitate access to information on the levels of minimum wage by undertakings that intend to seek establishment in another Member State;
23. ugotavlja, da prispevanje deleža v blagajno za plačani dopust v skladu s splošno zavezujočimi kolektivnimi pogodbami v nekaterih državah članicah pomeni dodatno varstvo za napotene delavce in da je neposredno plačilo delavcem v skladu z zgoraj navedeno sodbo SES v zadevi Finalarte sorazmerno; to pomeni, da se od podjetij, ki so delavce napotila, lahko zahteva, da prispevajo v blagajno za plačani dopust , ki mora biti namenjena tudi napotenim delavcem; da bi zagotovili enakopravno obravnavanje med podjetji države članice, se mu zdi potrebno, da so vsa podjetja v enaki meri zavezana k plačilu prispevkov za plačani dopust v državi članici, v katero to velja;
Notes that participation in holiday pay funds under general collective agreements constitutes additional protection for posted workers in some Member States and that direct payment to workers is proportionate in accordance with the Court of Justice's judgment in Finalarte : in other words, posting undertakings may be required to pay contributions into holiday pay funds, which must also be opened to posted workers; considers it necessary, in order to guarantee equal treatment between host country undertakings and posting undertakings, that all undertakings should be under an equal obligation to pay contributions into holiday pay funds in Member States where this applies;
26. ugotavlja, da imajo javni organi jasno odgovornost in morajo bistveno prispevati k preprečevanju nelojalne konkurence, tako da javna naročila oddajo le tistim podjetjem, ki upoštevajo vse predpise, ki veljajo v državi gostiteljici, v skladu s členom 3 direktive o napotitvi; se v zvezi s tem sklicuje na člen 55 direktive o javnih naročilih
Notes that public authorities have a clear responsibility and must make a significant contribution towards stemming unfair competition by awarding contracts only to those firms that comply with all the provisions applicable in the host country in respect of Article 3 of the Posting of Workers Directive; refers in this connection to Article 55 of the Public Procurement Directive
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/18/ES z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev (UL L 134,30.4.2004, str.
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p.
114). , v skladu s katerim lahko naročniki zahtevajo podrobne podatke v zvezi z zaščito delovnega mesta in pogoji za delo, če so ponudbe glede na storitve neobičajno nizke;
114). , under the terms of which contracting entities may demand details relating to employment protection and working conditions if tenders appear to be abnormally low in relation to the goods, works or services;
Zagotavljanje učinkovitega nadzora
Guaranteeing effective supervision
30. meni, da imajo skupni ukrepi za nadzor skladnosti s pravili pomembno upravno prednost pred dvostranskimi stiki med državami članicami; zato poziva Komisijo k usklajevanju ukrepov držav članic za nadzorovanje skladnosti z direktivo s strani podjetij države gostiteljice;
Considers that joint action to supervise compliance with the rules has significant administrative advantages over bilateral contacts between Member States; calls, therefore, on the Commission to coordinate action by Member States to supervise compliance with the directive by host country undertakings;
32. opozarja na pripombo Komisije v zvezi z neučinkovitim delovanjem nacionalnih uradov za zvezo; ugotavlja tudi, da je načrt, da postanejo nacionalni uradi za zvezo delujoči, ena od glavnih prednostnih nalog Komisije in držav članic in da je delovanje nacionalnih uradov za zvezo v pristojnosti tako Komisije kot držav članic;
Notes the comment by the Commission concerning the ineffectiveness of the national liaison offices; notes also that the objective to make the national liaison offices operational is one of the most basic priorities of the Commission and the Member States and that the functioning of the national liaison offices is a responsibility shared between the Commission and the Member States;
35. poziva Komisijo, da Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsaki dve leti predloži konkretne podatke o prenosu direktive o napotitvi delavcev na nacionalni ravni, pri čemer naj se osredotoči na primere kršitev direktive;
Calls on the Commission to submit biennually to the Parliament and the Council concrete data on the transposition at national level of the Posting of Workers Directive, focussing on instances of infringements of the directive;
Direktiva o napotitvi
The Posting of Workers Directive
96/71/EC. ureja minimalne predpise v zvezi z varstvom pri delu in pogoje za delo (člen 3) za različne oblike zaposlitev delavcev (člen 1), ki v okviru izvajanja storitve začasno delajo v drugi državi članici (država gostiteljica).
96/71/EC. sets out the minimum standards for industrial safety and working conditions (Article 3) for various kinds of employees (Article 1) who are temporarily posted to another Member State (the host country) in the framework of the provision of services.
Taka napotitev ne vpliva na kolektivno pogodbo zaposlenih, ki je sklenjena v matični državi in mora veljati za celotno obdobje napotitve.
Such posting does not affect the employment contract the employees have concluded in their country of origin, which must cover the entire period of the posting.
Napoteni delavci imajo v skladu z direktivo pravico do enakega obravnavanja v primerjavi z delavci v državi gostiteljici v skladu z minimalnimi predpisi, določenimi v členu 3 direktive.
Under the Directive, posted employees have the right to the same treatment as workers in the host country in respect of the minimum standards set out in Article 3 of the Directive.
Za minimalne predpise v zvezi z varstvom pri delu in pogoje za zaposlitev so v skladu s členom 3 odločilni zakonski predpisi ali kolektivne pogodbe države gostiteljice.
Under Article 3, it is the legal provisions or collective agreements of the host country which determine the minimum standards of industrial safety and conditions of employment.
Tudi država gostiteljica je v celoti odgovorna za zagotovitev varstva in pravic napotenih delavcev.
The host country also bears full responsibility for ensuring that the protection of the posted workers is guaranteed and their rights respected.
Sprejeti mora ukrepe (člen 5), ki preprečujejo nespoštovanja minimalnih prepisov ter tako tudi socialni damping in nelojalno konkurenco.
It is required to take measures (Article 5) to prevent the minimum standards from being circumvented resulting in social dumping and unfair competition.
Zaradi velikih pomanjkljivosti in nepopolnih izjav v poročilu Komisije o izvajanju direktive o napotitvi v državah članicah
In view of the significant failings of the Commission's report on the implementation of the Posting of Workers Directive in the Member States, and its lack of any substantial observations
KOM(2003)0458 . je Evropski parlament od Komisije zahteva drugo poročilo do konca leta 2004.
COM(2003)0458 . , the European Parliament called on the Commission to issue a second report by the end of 2004.
Kljub nadaljnjim zahtevam Parlamenta je bilo poročilo
In spite of all Parliament's subsequent requests, that report
KOM(2006)0439 /2. posredovano šele aprila 2006.
COM(2006)0439 /2. was not submitted until April 2006.
Hkrati je Komisija v členih 24 in 25 direktive o storitvah
At the same time the Commission decided, in Articles 24 and 25 of the Services Directive
KOM(2004)0002 . sprejela omejitve ukrepov držav članic proti izvajalcem storitev v zvezi z izvajanjem direktive o napotitvi.
COM(2004)0002 . , to place restrictions on the national measures which may be imposed on the service provider in connection with the implementation of the Posting of Workers Directive.
Mednje je med drugim spadala obveznost izbire pravnega zastopnika v državi gostiteljici ali predložitve dokumentov o socialni varnosti na kraju samem ali zahteve po predložitvi dovoljenja za prebivanje državljanov tretjih držav.
These include the requirement to be registered, to have a legal representative in the host country, and to keep employment documents in its territory, and, in the case of third country nationals, to require a residence permit.
Evropski parlament meni, da je s tem državi članici odvzeto ključno orodje, potrebno za spremljanje skladnosti z minimalnimi predpisi iz člena 3.
The European Parliament considers that this deprives the host country of key tools which it needs in order to monitor compliance with the minimum standards set out in Article 3.
Zato je Parlament črtal člena 24 in 25 direktive o storitvah.
Accordingly Parliament deleted Articles 24 and 25 of the Services Directive.
V spremenjenem predlogu direktive o storitvah
In its amended draft of the Services Directive
Zahtevano poročilo
The report which was called for
KOM(2006)0439 /2. le površinsko obravnava zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta po preverjanju velikih pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju in nadzoru direktive o napotitvi, vendar vseeno prevzema glavne izjave "priročnika" o omejevanju nadzornih instrumentov.
COM(2006)0439 /2. also deals only superficially with Parliament’s calls for examination of the significant failings in the implementation and monitoring of the Posting of Workers Directive, though it reinstates the central elements of the manual for the restriction of the monitoring instruments.
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in VARSTVO potrošnikov
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
o uporabi Direktive 96/71/ES o napotitvi delavcev
on the Application of Directive 96/71/EC on the posting of workers
A. ker je treba direktivo 96/71/ES razumeti v luči členov 49 in 50 Pogodbe, saj je napotitev delavcev bistveni del svobode opravljanja storitev, pri čemer se ne sme zanemariti cilj varovanja delovnopravnih pravic napotenih delavcev,
A. whereas Directive 96/71/EC should be interpreted in the light of Articles 49 and 50 of the Treaty since Posted workers is an intrinsic part of free provision of services, without however neglecting the aim of safeguarding the labour rights of posted workers,
B. ker dobro uveljavljena sodna praksa Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti poudarja, da se svobodo opravljanja storitev lahko omeji za zaščito delavcev pod pogojema, da delavci niso upravičeni do bistveno podobne stopnje zaščite v okviru prava države članice, kjer ima delodajalec sedež, in da je uporaba omenjenih pravil sorazmerna z zasledovanjem zadanega cilja v javnem interesu; ker direktiva 96/71/ES določa osnovne delovne pogoje, ki morajo veljati za napotene delavce,
B. whereas well established case-law of the European Court of Justice points out that the freedom to provide services may be restricted to protect workers on the two-fold condition that workers do not enjoy an essentially similar level of protection under the law of the Member State where their employer is established and that the application of those rules is proportionate to the public interest objective pursued; whereas Directive 96/71/EC sets the core employment conditions which must be applied to posted workers,
4. poziva države članice, naj po potrebi izboljšajo sodelovanje za namen izvajanja direktive 96/71/ES in poenostavijo zadevne postopke in formalnosti;
Calls on the Member States, in so far as necessary, to improve their cooperation for the purpose of implementing Directive 96/71/EC and to simplify the procedures and formalities involved;
6. meni tudi, da morajo države članice nujno vzpostaviti učinkovit sistem sodelovanja, s katerim bodo odpravile vse nesorazmerne upravne zahteve, saj se je rok za izvajanje direktive 96/71/ES v državah članicah iztekel 16. decembra 1999;
Considers also that it is imperative for the Member States to set up an efficient system of cooperation which must replace all disproportionate administrative requirements, since the deadline for implementing Directive 96/71/EC in the Member States expired on 16 December 1999;
8. poudarja, da si morajo države članice prizadevati za povečanje informacij o pogojih zaposlitve, ki jih morajo uporabljati ponudniki storitev, in zagotoviti, da imajo tuji ponudniki storitev in delavci dostop do teh informacij;
Stresses that Member States have to step up efforts to enhance information on the terms and conditions of employment that must be applied by service providers and to ensure that foreign service providers and workers have access to this information;
10. je trdno prepričan, da bi morala Komisija proti državam članicam, ki ne izvajajo Pogodbe in direktive 96/71/ES, zlasti glede upravnih ovir za napotitev delavcev in izvrševanja ter spoštovanja direktive, še naprej voditi in brez odlašanja sprožati postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev;
Is of the firm opinion that the Commission should continue to pursue and should initiate, without delay, infringement procedures against Member States which fail to comply with the Treaty and Directive 96/71/EC, in particular as regards administrative obstacles to the Posted workers and enforcement of and compliance with the Directive;
Uporaba Direktive 96/71/ES o napotitvi delavcev
The Application of Directive 96/71/EC on the posting of workers
Drugi poslanci (člen 183.3)
Other Members (Art. 183.3)
Uporaba Direktive 96/71/ES o napotitvi delavcev
The application of Directive 96/7/EC on the posting of workers
o letnem poročilu Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2005
on the annual report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2005
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2005,
– having regard to the annual report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2005,
– ob upoštevanju člena 43 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
– having regard to Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom z dne 9. marca 1994 o pravilih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje funkcije varuha človekovih pravic
– having regard to Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 9 March 1994, on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties
Spremenjen s Sklepom št. 2002/262/ES, ESPJ, Euratom (UL L 92, 9.4.2002, str.
Decision amended by Decision 2002/262/EC, ECSC, Euratom (OJ L 92, 9.4.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije z dne 5. oktobra 2005 v zvezi s pooblastilom za sprejetje in posredovanje sporočil evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic in za nastop javnih uradnikov pred njim ( SEC(2005)1227 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 5 October 2005 on ‘Empowerment to adopt and transmit communications to the European Ombudsman and authorise civil servants to appear before the European Ombudsman’ ( SEC(2005)1227 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, zlasti resolucije z dne 4. aprila 2006 o posebnem poročilu Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic o osnutku priporočila Svetu Evropske unije v zvezi s pritožbo 2395/2003/GG glede odprtja sej Sveta za javnost, kadar slednji nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the European Ombudsman’s activities, in particular, its resolution of 4 April 2006 on the special report from the European Ombudsman following the draft recommendation to the Council of the European Union in complaint 2395/2003/GG concerning the openness of the meetings of the Council when acting in its legislative capacity
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0121 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0121 . ,
– ob upoštevanju drugega in tretjega stavka člena 195(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 195(2), second and third sentences, of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije (A6 0309/2006)
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6‑0309/2006 ),
A. ker je predsednik Evropskega parlamenta 13. marca 2006 uradno prejel letno poročilo Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2005 in je varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamandouros svoje poročilo 3. maja 2006 v Bruslju predstavil Odboru za peticije,
A. whereas the annual report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2005 was formally submitted to the President of Parliament on 13 March 2006 and the Ombudsman, Mr Nikiforos Diamandouros, presented his report on 3 May 2006 to the Committee on Petitions in Brussels,
B. ker je bila Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah
B. whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
1. slovesno razglašena na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Nici dne 7. decembra 2000 in ker obstaja politična volja, da bi postala pravno zavezujoč dokument,
1. was proclaimed at the Nice European Council on 7 December 2000 and whereas the political will exists to give it binding force in law,
C. ker člen 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah določa, da ima vsakdo pravico, da institucije in organi Unije njegove zadeve obravnavajo nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku,
C. whereas Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights states that ‘Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union’,
D. ker člen 195 Pogodbe ES in člen 43 Listine temeljnih pravic določata, da ima "vsak državljan Unije in vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic pravico, da se glede nepravilnosti pri delovanju institucij in organov Skupnosti obrne na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, razen glede Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje v njuni pravosodni funkciji",
D. whereas Article 195 of the EC Treaty and Article 43 of the Charter state that ‘any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role’,
E. ker je bistveno, da imajo evropske institucije in organi proračunska sredstva, ki jih potrebujejo za izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti, zato da dobijo državljani hitre in vsebinske odgovore na svoja vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije,
E. whereas it is essential that the European institutions and bodies are equipped with the necessary budgetary resources in order to fulfil their obligations to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions,
F. ker je varuh človekovih pravic priporočil, da bi vse evropske institucije in organi sprejeli skupen pristop v zvezi z Evropskim kodeksom dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev in resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 6. septembra 2001
F. whereas the Ombudsman has advocated that all European institutions and bodies pursue a common approach with regard to the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour and Parliament's resolution of 6 September 2001 thereon
G. ker je bilo v letu 2005 na Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic naslovljeno največje število pritožb doslej
G. whereas 2005 saw the highest number of complaints to the European Ombudsman received so far
H. ker je med pritožbami, ki jih prejme varuh človekovih pravic, še vedno skoraj 70 % takih, ki ne spadajo v njegovo pristojnost, od tega jih 93,7 % ne spada v njegovo pristojnost zaradi vsebine, saj niso vložene proti instituciji ali organu Skupnosti,
H. whereas, however, almost 70% of all complaints received still fall outside the terms of reference of the Ombudsman and in 93.7% of cases, this is due to the fact that, in terms of content, they do not fall within those terms of reference since they are not directed against a Community institution or a Community body,
I. ker se dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic in Odbora za peticije lahko prekrivajo, zlasti kadar varuh človekovih pravic preverja, ali so postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki jih je Komisija sprožila proti državam članicam, v skladu s splošnimi načeli prava EU in načelom dobrega upravljanja, in kadar Odbor za peticije sočasno obravnava peticije o domnevnih kršitvah prava Skupnosti, ki naj bi jih v zvezi z isto zadevo zagrešila ta država članica,
I. whereas the activities of the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions may overlap, in particular, where the Ombudsman is examining whether the conduct by the Commission of infringement proceedings against a Member States has complied with general principles of EC law and good administration, and the Committee on Petitions, at the same time, is examining petitions that allege infringements of Community law by that Member State on the same subject,
J. ker rezultati opravljenih preiskav kažejo, da v 114 primerih (tj. pri 36 % obravnavanih pritožb) ni bilo možno ugotoviti nepravilnosti,
J. whereas the findings of the completed inquiries show that in 114 cases (corresponding to 36% of the complaints investigated) no maladministration could be ascertained,
K. ker imajo preiskave varuha človekovih pravic pogosto pozitivne rezultate za pritožnika ter zaradi sprejetja in izvajanja ustreznih ukrepov prispevajo k izboljšanju kakovosti upravljanja v zadevnih organih in institucijah,
K. whereas the Ombudsman's inquiries often produce positive results for complainants and help to improve the quality of administration through the adoption and implementation of suitable measures by the institutions and bodies concerned,
L. ker mu je varuh človekovih pravic v letu 2005 predložil tri posebna poročila in ker je predložitev posebnega poročila Parlamentu pomembno sredstvo za varuha človekovih pravic, s katerim pri nekaterih peticijah zaprosi za politično podporo Parlamenta in njegovega Odbora za peticije, kadar gre za urejanje zadev državljanov, katerih pravice so bile kršene, in s katerim se izboljšuje standard evropske uprave,
L. whereas the Ombudsman submitted to Parliament three special reports in 2005; and whereas submitting a special report to Parliament represents a valuable means by which the Ombudsman can seek the political support of Parliament and its Committee on Petitions in order to bring satisfaction to citizens whose rights have been infringed, as well as promoting the improvement of standards of European administration,
M. ker je bilo pri skoraj četrtini obravnavanih pritožb (188 primerov ali 24 %) ugotovljeno predvsem pomanjkanje preglednosti,
M. whereas the largest number of complaints, in almost a quarter of the cases investigated (188 cases, 24%), criticised a lack of transparency,
N. ker se je 68 % preiskav varuha človekovih pravic nanašalo na Komisijo; in ker je Komisija 4. oktobra 2005 sprejela nove notranje postopke za nadaljnjo obravnavo preiskav varuha človekovih pravic;
N. whereas 68% of the Ombudsman’s inquiries concerned the Commission; and whereas the Commission adopted new internal procedures on 4 October 2005 for responding to the Ombudsman's inquiries,