natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
analizne metode
Methods of Inpection
mineralna olja
Mineral oils
Na površini vode ni vidnega filma in nobenega vonja.
No film visible on the surface of the water and no odour
pregledi vidnih sprememb in vonja
Visual and olfactory inspection
ostanki katrana in plavajočega materiala, kot so les, plastika, steklo, guma ali katera koli druga odpadna snov.
Tarry residues and floating materials such as wood, plastic, glass, rubber or any other waste substance.
pregledi vidnih sprememb
Visual inspection
samo za sladke vode
Only for fresh waters
6 to 9 Ni nerazložljivih sprememb
6 to 9 No unexplainable variations
elektrometrična kalibracija z vrednostma pH 7 in pH 9
Electrometry with calibration on pH 7 and pH 9
Vrednost 95-ega percentila se izračuna takole
The 95 percentile value is calculated as defined as follows
Bartram, J in Rees, G (Eds) Monitoring Bathing Waters.
Bartram, J and Rees, G (Eds) Monitoring Bathing Waters.
E in F N Spon, London. .
E and F N Spon, London. .
Na podlagi vrednotenja 95-ega percentila log 10 normalne funkcije verjetnostne gostote mikrobioloških podatkov, pridobljenih iz določene kopalne vode; se vrednost 95-ega percentila izračuna takole:
Based upon 95 percentile evaluation of the log 10 normal probability density function of microbiological data acquired from one bathing water; the 95 percentile value is derived as follows:
(i) vzemite vrednost log 10 vseh bakterijskih vrednotenj v zaporedju podatkov, ki se ga vrednoti,
(i) take the log 10 value of all bacterial enumerations in the data sequence to be evaluated,
(ii) izračunajte aritmetično sredino vrednosti log 10 (µ),
(ii) calculate the arithmetic mean of the log 10 values ( ),
(iii) izračunajte standardni odklon vrednosti log 10 ( σ ).
(iii) calculate the standard deviation of the log 10 values ( ).
Zgornjo točko 95-ega percentila funkcije verjetnostne gostote podatkov dobite z naslednjo enačbo:
The upper 95 percentile point of the data probability density function is derived from the following equation:
zgornji 95-i percentil = antilog ((μ) +( 1,65 x σ )).
95 percentile = antilog (( )+(1.65 x   
Sprememba nove prvine, uvedene v skupno stališče Sveta.
Amends new element introduced in the Council Common Position.
S črtanjem Priloge I se spremeni preostanek predloga, ki je potreben za doslednost direktive.
A deletion of Annex I make changes in the rest of the proposal necessary to make the directive consistent .
Priloga II, odstavek 1, „Slaba kakovost“
Annex II, paragraph 1, "Poor quality"
Kopalne vode se zvrstijo kot „slabe“, če so v skupku podatkov o kakovosti kopalnih voda za zadnje ocenjevalno obdobje a percentilne vrednosti b za mikrobiološka vrednotenja slabše c od „zadostnih“ vrednosti, določenih v stolpcu D Priloge I.
Bathing waters are to be classified as "poor " if, in the set of bathing water quality data for the last assessment period a , the percentile values b for microbiological enumerations are worse c than the " sufficient " values set out in Annex I, column D .
Kopalne vode se zvrstijo kot „slabe“, če so v skupku podatkov o kakovosti kopalnih voda za zadnje ocenjevalno obdobje a percentilne vrednosti b za mikrobiološka vrednotenja slabše c od „ dobrih “ vrednosti, določenih v stolpcu C Priloge I.
Bathing waters are to be classified as "poor " if, in the set of bathing water quality data for the last assessment period a , the percentile values b for microbiological enumerations are worse c than the " good " values set out in Annex I, column C .
Črtanje nove prvine v skupnem stališču zaradi ponovne uvedbe določil o stanju kakovosti v skladu s členoma 4 in 9 in Priloge I in II predloga Komisije.
Deletion of a new element in the common position so as to reinstate the provisions on quality status in line with Articles 4 and 9 and Annex I and II of the Commission proposal.
Glej tudi obrazložitev predloga spremembe 7.
See also justification to amendment 7.
Priloga II, odstavek 2, Zadostna kakovost
Annex II, paragraph 2, Sufficient quality
ZADOSTNA KAKOVOST
SUFFICIENT QUALITY
Kopalne vode se razvrstijo kot „zadostne“:
Bathing waters are to be classified as "sufficient":
1) če so v skupku podatkov kakovosti kopalnih voda za zadnje ocenjevalno obdobje percentilne vrednosti za mikrobiološka vrednotenja enake ali boljše d kot „zadostne“ vrednosti, določene v Stolpcu D Priloge I, in
1) if, in the set of bathing water quality data for the last assessment period, the percentile values for microbiological enumerations are equal to or better d than the "sufficient" values set out in Annex I, column D; and
2) če so kopalne vode izpostavljene kratkotrajnemu onesnaženju, pod pogojem, da:
2) if the bathing water is subject to short-term pollution, on condition that:
(i) so bili sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi upravljanja, vključno z nadzorovanjem, sistemi zgodnjega opozarjanja in spremljanja, da bi preprečili izpostavljenost kopalcev z opozorilom ali, kjer je to potrebno, s prepovedjo kopanja,
(i) adequate management measures are being taken, including surveillance, early warning systems and monitoring, with a view to preventing bathers’ exposure by means of a warning or, where necessary, a bathing prohibition;
(ii) so bili sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi za preprečitev, zmanjšanje ali odpravo vzrokov onesnaženja, and
(ii) adequate management measures are being taken to prevent, reduce or eliminate the causes of pollution; and
(iii) število vzorcev, prezrtih v skladu s členom 3(6) zaradi kratkotrajnih onesnaženj v zadnjem ocenjevalnem obdobju, ni presegalo 15 % skupnega števila vzorcev, predvidenih v koledarjih spremljanja, ki so bili določeni za to obdobje, oziroma ne več kot en vzorec na kopalno sezono, kar je večje.
(iii) the number of samples disregarded in accordance with Article 3(6) because of short ‑term pollution during the last assessment period represented no more than 15% of the total number of samples provided for in the monitoring calendars established for that period, or no more than one sample per bathing season, whichever is the greater.
Črtanje novega elementa v skupnem stališču, da se ponovno uvedejo določila o stanju kakovosti v skladu s členoma 4 in 9 in Priloge I in II predloga Komisije.
Deletion of a new element in the common position so as to reinstate the provisions on quality status in line with Articles 4 and 9 and Annexes I and II of the Commission proposal.
Če so kopalne vode razvrščene kot „dobre“, „zadostne“ ali „slabe“, se profil kopalnih voda redno pregleduje, da se oceni, ali se je spremenil kateri koli izmed vidikov, navedenih v odstavku 1.
In the case of bathing waters classified as "good" , "sufficient" or "poor", the bathing water profile is to be reviewed regularly to assess whether any of the aspects listed in paragraph 1 have changed.
Če je treba, se ga posodobi.
If necessary, it is to be updated.
Pogostost in obseg pregledov se določi na podlagi narave in resnosti onesnaženja.
The frequency and scope of reviews is to be determined on the basis of the nature and severity of the pollution.
Če so kopalne vode razvrščene kot „dobre“, ali „slabe“, se profil kopalnih voda redno pregleduje, da se oceni, ali se je spremenil kateri koli izmed vidikov, navedenih v odstavku 1.
In the case of bathing waters classified as "good" or "poor", the bathing water profile is to be reviewed regularly to assess whether any of the aspects listed in paragraph 1 have changed.
Pogostost in obseg pregledov se določi na podlagi narave in kritičnosti onesnaženja.
The frequency and scope of reviews is to be determined on the basis of the nature and severity of the pollution.
Vendar pa se pri pregledih upoštevajo vsaj določbe iz naslednje razpredelnice, ki določa tudi njihovo najmanjšo pogostost.
However, they are to comply with at least the provisions and to take place with at least the frequency specified in the following table.
Glej obrazložitev predloga sprememba 7.
See justification for amendment 7.
Črtanje novega elementa v skupnem stališču, da se ponovno uvedejo določila o stanju kakovosti v skladu s členoma 4 in 9 in Priloge I, II in III predloga Komisije.
Deletion of a new element in the common position so as to reinstate the provisions on quality status in line with Articles 4 and 9 and Annexes I, II and III of the Commission proposal.
Priloga III, odstavek 2, tabela, tretji stolpec, „Zadostna kakovost“
Annex III, paragraph 2, table, third column, "Sufficient"
Priloga III, odstavek 2, pododstavek 2
Annex III, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2
Če so bile kopalne vode prej razvrščene kot „odlične“, se profil kopalnih voda pregleduje in, če je potrebno, posodobi le v primeru, če se razvrstitev spremeni v „dobre“ ali „zadostne“ .
In the case of bathing waters previously classified as "excellent", the bathing water profiles need be reviewed and, if necessary, updated only if the classification changes to "good" , "sufficient" or "poor".
Pregled pokriva vse vidike, omenjene v odstavku 1.
The review is to cover all aspects mentioned in paragraph 1.
Če so bile kopalne vode prej razvrščene kot „odlične“, se profil kopalnih voda pregleduje in po potrebi posodobi le v primeru, če se razvrstitev spremeni v „dobre“ ali „slabe“.
In the case of bathing waters previously classified as "excellent", the bathing water profiles need be reviewed and, if necessary, updated only if the classification changes to "good" or "poor".
Črtanje nove prvine v skupnem stališču, da se ponovno uvedejo določila o stanju kakovosti v skladu s členoma 4 in 9 in Priloge I, II in III predloga Komisije.
Deletion of a new element in the common position so as to reinstate the provisions on quality status in line with Articles 4 and 9 and Annexes I, II and III of the Commission proposal.
Priloga III, odstavek 4
Annex III, paragraph 4
Ko je to potrebno , se informacije iz odstavkov 1(a) in (b) zagotovijo na podrobni karti.
W hen appropriate, the information referred to in paragraph 1(a) and (b) is to be provided on a detailed map.
Podatke, navedene v odstavku 1(a) in (b), se zagotovi na podrobni karti.
The information referred to in paragraph 1(a) and (b) is to be provided on a detailed map.
Ponovna uvedba ustrezne določbe iz Priloge III predloga Komisije.
Reinstatement of the corresponding provision in Annex III of the Commission proposal.
Priloga V, odstavek 4, pododstavek 3
Annex V, paragraph 4, subparagraph 3
Čas med odvzemom vzorca in analizo je čim krajši.
The time between sampling and analysis is to be kept as short as possible.
Priporoča se, da se vzorci analizirajo istega delovnega dne.
It is recommended that samples be analysed on the same working day.
Če to zaradi praktičnih razlogov ni mogoče, se vzorec obdela najpozneje v 24 urah.
If this is not possible for practical reasons, then the samples are to be processed within no more than 24 hours.
Medtem so shranjeni v temi in pri temperaturi 4 °C ± 3 °C.
In the meantime, they are to be stored in the dark and at a temperature of 4°C ± 3°C.
Ponovna uvedba predloga spremembe 75 iz prve obravnave, sprejetega 21. oktobra 2003, (UR L 82, 1.
Reinstatement of amendment 75 from first reading, adopted on 21 October 2003 (OJ C 1.4.2004).
Da bi zagotovili, da merjenje predstavlja koncentracijo v času vzorčenja, je treba uvesti preprosto prilagoditev po znani formuli(T-90).
To ensure that the measurement represents the concentration at the time of sampling, a simple adjustment according to the known formulae (T-90 decay) needs to be undertaken.
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o upravljanju v zvezi s kakovostjo kopalnih voda in razveljavitvi Direktive 76/160/EGS
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC
člen 251(2) in 175(1) ES
Articles 251(2) and 175(1) EC
Georgs Andrejevs, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Caroline Jackson, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Adriana Poli Bortone, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Richard Seeber, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber in Åsa Westlund.
Georgs Andrejevs, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Caroline Jackson, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Adriana Poli Bortone, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Richard Seeber, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber and Åsa Westlund.
Margrete Auken, María del Pilar Ayuso González, Danutė Budreikaitė, Jerzy Buzek, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Caroline Lucas, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Renate Sommer in Andres Tarand.
Margrete Auken, María del Pilar Ayuso González, Danutė Budreikaitė, Jerzy Buzek, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Caroline Lucas, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Renate Sommer and Andres Tarand.
Poročevalec: Bogdan Adam Klich
Rapporteur: Bogdan Adam Klich
(*) Okrepljeno sodelovanje med odbori – člen 47(1) Poslovnika
(*) Enhanced cooperation between committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................15
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............16
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 18
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 20
o raziskavah na področju varnosti – naslednji koraki
on Security Research - The Next Steps
– ob upoštevanju Evropske varnostne strategije „Varna Evropa v boljšem svetu“, ki jo je sprejel Evropski svet 12. decembra 2003,
– having regard to the European Security Strategy, 'A secure Europe in a better world', adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Raziskava varnosti – naslednji koraki“( KOM(2004)0590 ) in prejšnjih sporočil Komisije ( KOM(2003)0113 in KOM(2004)0072 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission entitled "Security Research – The Next Steps" ( COM(2004)0590 ), and to the Commission's previous communications ( COM(2003)0113 and COM(2004)0072 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom „Gradimo skupno prihodnost – Politični izzivi in proračunska sredstva razširjene Unije za obdobje 2007–2013“ ( KOM(2004)0101 ) in sporočila Komisije z naslovom “Znanost in tehnologija, ključna pojma za prihodnost Evrope – Usmeritve politike za podpiranje raziskovanja v Uniji“ ( KOM(2004)0353 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament entitled "Building our common Future – Policy challenges and Budgetary means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013" ( COM(2004)0101 ), as well as the Commission's Communication entitled "Science and technology, the key to Europe's future – Guidelines for future European Union policy to support research" ( COM(2004)0353 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočil Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o „preprečevanju in boju proti financiranju terorizma z ukrepi za izboljšanje izmenjave informacij, krepitev preglednosti in povečanje sledljivosti finančnih transakcij“ ( KOM(2004)0700 ), „pripravljenosti in upravljanju s posledicami v boju proti terorizmu“ ( KOM(2004)0701 ) ter „preprečevanju, pripravljenosti in odzivu na teroristične napade“ ( KOM(2004)0698 ),
– having regard to the communications from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on 'The prevention of and the fight against terrorist financing through measures to improve the exchange of information, to strengthen transparency and enhance the traceability of financial transactions' ( COM(2004)0700 ), 'Preparedness and consequence management in the fight against terrorism' ( COM(2004)0701 ) and 'Prevention, preparedness and response to terrorist attacks' ( COM(2004)0698 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucij z dne 15. maja 1997
– having regard to its resolutions of 15 May 1997
UL C 128, 7.5.1999, str.
OJ C 128, 7.5.1999, p.
86. in z dne 10. aprila 2002
86. and 10 April 2002
UL C 127 E, 29.5.2003, str.
OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
582. o evropski obrambni industriji,
582. on European defence-related industries,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 10. aprila 2003 o novi evropski varnostni in obrambni arhitekturi – prednostih in pomanjkljivostih
– having regard to its resolution of 10 April 2003 on the new European security and defence architecture – priorities and deficiencies
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 20. novembra 2003 o politiki obrambne opreme EU
– having regard to its resolution of 20 November 2003 on EU Defence Equipment Policy
– ob upoštevanju predloga za belo knjigo o evropski obrambi, ki ga je predložil Inštitut Evropske Unije za varnostne študije v maju 2004,
– having regard to the Proposal for a White Paper on European defence as presented by the EU Institute for Security Studies in May 2004,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o varnostni doktrini za Evropo, predstavljenega visokemu predstavniku EU za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko 15. septembra 2004,
– having regard to the report on Human Security Doctrine for Europe as presented to the EU High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy on 15 September 2004,
– ob upoštevanju poročila skupine strokovnjakov s področja raziskav na področju varnosti z naslovom “Raziskava za varno Evropo“ z dne 15. marca 2004,
– having regard to the report of the Group of Personalities in the Field of Security Research, entitled 'Research for a Secure Europe', of 15 March 2004,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0103/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0103/2005 ),
A. ker je po nedavnih geopolitičnih, socialnih in tehnoloških spremembah ter nedavnih svetovnih dogodkih, na primer teroristični napadi 11. septembra 2001 v ZDA in 11. marca 2004 v Madridu, varnost postala nujnejša zadeva in ker bi morale biti države članice EU bolje pripravljene za obravnavanje novih groženj varnosti z učinkovitejšo uporabo svojega znanja in izkušenj,
A. whereas following recent geo-political, social and technological changes and recent world events such as the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 in the USA and 11 March 2004 in Madrid, security has become a more urgent issue, and whereas the EU Member States should be better prepared to deal with new security threats through more effective use of their know-how,
B. ker širitev na petindvajset držav članic ustvarja nove vrste varnostnih izzivov za novo Evropo, ki sedaj meji na bolj ranljive regije,
B. whereas the enlargement to twenty five Member States generates new kinds of security challenges for a new Europe that now borders on more vulnerable regions,
C. ker te nove grožnje uporabljajo nove tehnologije,ne upoštevajo državnih mej, izkoriščajo inherentno odprtost ter preglednost sodobne visoke tehnologije in demokratičnih evropskih družb ter ogrožajo varnost držav članic od zunaj in znotraj ozemlja EU, da je težje ločevati med notranjo in zunanjo varnostjo,
C. whereas these new threats make use of new technologies, ignore state borders, exploit the inherent openness and transparency of modern high-technology and democratic European societies, and menace the security of Member States both from outside and inside EU territory, rendering it more difficult to distinguish between internal and external security,
D. ker mora biti Evropska unija sposobna zagotoviti zaščito svojih državljanov, prispevati k stabilnosti evropske celine in sosednjih območij ter prispevati k ohranjanju miru in mednarodne varnosti v skladu z načeli Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov ter cilji skupne zunanje in varnostne politike,
D. whereas the European Union must be capable of ensuring the protection of its citizens, of contributing to the stability of the European continent and neighbouring areas and of contributing to the preservation of peace and international security in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter and the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy,
E. ker je težko zagotoviti verodostojno varnostno in obrambno politiko ter varnejšo Evropo brez tehnološko naprednih sredstev in zmogljivosti, ki uporabljajo najsodobnejšo tehnologijo, s katero ohranjajo grožnje varnosti na najnižji ravni,
E. Considerando la dificultad de garantizar una política de seguridad y de defensa creíble y una Europa más segura sin instrumentos y capacidades tecnológicamente avanzados, que aproveche el estado de la tecnología para reducir al mínimo los riesgos en el ámbito de la seguridad,
F. ker, kljub možnostim EU v zvezi z raziskovanjem in razvojem varnostnih tehnologij pomanjkanje posebnega okvira za raziskave na področju varnosti na ravni EU ter visoka razdrobitev in podvajanja v sistemih in infrastrukturah za raziskave na področju varnosti ustvarjajo ovire za najdbo stroškovno učinkovitih rešitev,
F. whereas, despite the EU potential regarding research and development security technologies, the lack of a specific framework for security research at EU level and the high fragmentation and duplication in security research systems and infrastructures generates significant obstacles to delivering cost-effective solutions,
G. ker je skupen znesek naložb Združenih držav v državno varnost povprečno štirikrat višji od skupnega zneska naložb Evrope in ta naložba, ki ne vključuje raziskav tehnologij z dvojno rabo, ki jih je uvedlo Ministrstvo za obrambo ZDA, je porazdeljena čez vrsto ameriških ministrstev in zato predstavlja celovit pristop k raziskavam na področju varnosti;
G. whereas the total United States investment in homeland security is on average four times greater than that invested by Europe, and this investment, which does not include research into dual-use technologies founded by the US Department of Defense, is spread across a range of US departments thus representing a comprehensive approach to security research;
H. ker je naložba za raziskave in razvoj v obrambnem sektorju v državah članicah približno petkrat manjša od skladne naložbe v ZDA, kar povečuje tveganje, da bo EU na tem področju ranljivejša in bolj odvisna,
H. whereas the investment for research and development in the defence sector in Member States is approximately five times less than the corresponding investment in the US, increasing the risk of the EU becoming more vulnerable and dependent in this field,
I. ker je razlika med civilnimi in vojaškimi raziskavami vedno bolj nejasna,
I. whereas the distinction between civil and military research is becoming increasingly blurred,
J. ker bi lahko raziskava varnosti igrala strateško vlogo pri povečanju industrijske konkurenčnosti Evrope ter okrepitvi njene znanstvene in tehnološke osnove, kot jo določajo lizbonski in barcelonski cilji,
J. whereas security research could play a strategic role towards enhancing Europe’s industrial competitiveness and towards the strengthening of its scientific and technological base, as established by the Lisbon and Barcelona goals,
3. poudarja pomen vseh vidikov raziskav na področju varnosti za javni interes in v skladu s tem poziva, naj se programom in projektom na tem področju zagotovi zadostno stabilnost in naj bo delitev proračunskih sredstev vezana na trend bruto domačega proizvoda, da se bo v največji možni meri zagotovila stalnost skozi čas in najboljši rezultati;
Underlines the public-interest nature of all aspects relating to security research, and accordingly calls for the programmes and projects in this field to be given sufficient stability and for the budgetary allocation to be linked to the trend in gross domestic product, so as to secure the greatest possible continuity over time and the best results;