natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Politično soglasje v Svetu je bilo doseženo konec junija pod luksemburškim predsedstvom.
Political agreement in the Council was reached at the end of June under the Luxembourg Presidency.
Skupno stališče Sveta je bilo dokončno potrjeno 23. januarja 2006.
On 23 January 2006 the Council's common position was finally approved.
V prvi obravnavi je Parlament skorajda soglasno podprl pristop poročevalke.
At first reading Parliament was virtually unanimous in endorsing the rapporteur's approach.
Parlament si je še posebej prizadeval opozoriti na dejstvo, da je javnost upravičena do nekaterih brezplačnih informacij.
Parliament was particularly minded to draw attention to the fact that the public is entitled to certain information free of charge.
Kljub temu predlog ne izključuje možnosti, da oblasti za izmenjavo informacij zaračunajo majhno pristojbino.
However, the proposal does not rule out the authorities asking for a small fee when exchanging information.
Poleg tega je Parlament menil, da pravice intelektualne lastnine ne bi smele ovirati zagotavljanja informacij, čeprav je mogoče pri tem določiti še dodatne pogoje (na primer klik-licence).
Furthermore, Parliament took the view that intellectual property rights should not be an impediment to making information available, although additional conditions may be imposed (e.g. click-licence).
Priloge predloga so bile v številnih točkah podkrepljene.
The annexes to the proposal were also tightened up considerably on a number of points.
V splošnem je Parlament v celoti podprl namen predloga.
In general, Parliament stood firmly behind the aim of the proposal.
Skupno stališče in priporočilo za drugo obravnavo
Common position and recommendation for second reading
V prvi obravnavi je bilo sprejetih 49 predlogov sprememb, od tega je bilo v skupnem stališču Sveta delno ali v celoti upoštevanih kakih deset manj bistvenih predlogov sprememb in popravkov prilog.
Of the 49 amendments adopted at first reading, ten or so minor amendments and modifications to the annexes have been accepted in full or in part in the Council's common position.
Najpomembnejši, ključni predlogi sprememb večinoma niso bili upoštevani.
Of the important core amendments very little remains.
Zaradi tega poročevalka predlaga, da se znova vložijo v prvotni ali nekoliko popravljeni obliki.
Consequently, your rapporteur proposes that they should be re-tabled in their original or a slightly amended form.
Odbor za okolje denimo želi, da se pravice intelektualne lastnine izbrišejo s seznama izjem, ki bi utegnile omejiti dostop do okoljskih informacij.
For example, the Environment Committee wants intellectual property rights to be deleted from the list of exceptions that would restrict access to environmental information.
Brezplačen dostop, z drugimi besedami dostop brez stroškov, je treba zagotoviti tako za storitve iskanja kot za storitve pregledovanja.
Free access, in other words access free of charge, must be guaranteed not only for search services but also for view services.
Odbor želi upoštevati vprašanje stroškov, vendar odločno nasprotuje neskončnim analizam in dodatnim pogojem izvedljivosti.
The Committee wishes to take account of the cost issue but is totally opposed to interminable analyses and additional feasibility conditions.
Vse morebitne pristojbine je treba omejiti.
There must be a limit on any fees charged.
Povrhu je izjemnega pomena, da se v federativnih državah, ob upoštevanju ustavne porazdelitve pristojnosti, vzpostavijo koordinacijske strukture, ki bodo jamstvo za učinkovito izvajanje direktive.
Furthermore, it is crucially important that in federal states, bearing in mind the constitutional distribution of powers, coordination structures should be set up to ensure that the directive can be implemented effectively.
INSPIRE bo Evropski uniji omogočil velik korak k bolj trajnostni evropski okoljski politiki.
INSPIRE will allow the Union to take a major step forward towards a more sustainable European environmental policy
Skupna stališča Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi infrastrukture za prostorske informacije v Evropski skupnosti (INSPIRE)
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)
o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2004: uporaba načela subsidiarnosti – dvanajsto letno poročilo
on Better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity – 12th annual report
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................16
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............16
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o presoji vplivov z dne 5. junija 2002 ( KOM(2002)0276 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 5 June 2002 on impact assessment ( COM(2002)0276 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o akcijskem načrtu „Poenostavitev in izboljšanje zakonodajnega okolja“ z dne 5. junija 2002 ( KOM(2002)0278 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 5 June 2002 on the Action plan ‘Simplifying and improving the regulatory environment’ ( COM(2002)0278 ),
– ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 16. decembra 2003 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o boljši pripravi zakonodaje
– having regard to the interinstitutional agreement of 16 December 2003 on better lawmaking
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za konkurenčnost z dne 25. in 26. novembra 2004,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Competitiveness Council of 25-26 November 2004,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Bolje oblikovani predpisi za rast in delovna mesta v Evropski uniji“ z dne 16. marca 2005 ( KOM(2005)0097 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled "Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union" of 16 March 2005 ( COM(2005)0097 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije „Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2004“ z dne 21. marca 2005 ( KOM(2005)0098 ),
– having regard to the Commission report entitled “Better lawmaking 2004” of 21 March 2005 ( COM(2005)0098 ),
– ob upoštevanju smernic Evropske komisije za presojo vplivov in prilog z dne 15. junija 2005 ( SEC(2005)0791 ),
- having regard to the Commission's Impact Assessment guidelines of 15 June 2005 and the annexes thereto ( SEC(2005)0791 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Rezultati preverjanja zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo zakonodajalca“ z dne 27. septembra 2005 (KOM (2005) 462),
- having regard to the Commission communication entitled "Outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator" of 27 September 2005 ( COM(2005)0462 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenj Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora o boljšem izvajanju zakonodaje EU in bolje oblikovanih predpisih z dne 28. septembra 2005,
- having regard to the European Economic and Social Committee opinions on better implementation of EU legislation and better regulation of 28 September 2005,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o skupni metodologiji EU za presojo administrativnih stroškov, ki izhajajo iz zakonodaje, z dne 21. oktobra 2005 (KOM (2005)0518),
- having regard to the Commission communication "on an EU common methodology for assessing administrative costs imposed by legislation" of 21 October 2005 ( COM(2005)0518 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. decembra 2005 o zakonodajnem in delovnem programu Komisije za leto 2006
- having regard to its resolution of 15 December 2005 on the legislative and work programme of the Commission for 2006
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2005)0524 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0524 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0082/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0082/2006 ),
A. ker Komisija v sporočilu o bolje oblikovanih predpisih za rast in delovna mesta v Evropski uniji vzpostavlja jasno povezavo med doseganjem lizbonskih ciljev in bolje oblikovanimi predpisi,
A. whereas, in its Communication on better regulation for growth and jobs in the European Union, the Commission establishes a clear link between achieving the Lisbon objectives and better regulation,
B. ker bi moralo biti pregledno, jasno, učinkovito in zelo kakovostno zakonodajno okolje prednostni cilj politike Evropske unije,
B. whereas establishing a transparent, clear, effective and high-quality regulatory environment should be a priority objective of European Union policy,
C. ker je zakonodajno okolje, v katerem delujejo podjetja, odločilni dejavnik za njihovo konkurenčnost, za trajnostno rast in posledično, za njihovo učinkovitost zaposlovanja,
C. whereas the regulatory environment in which businesses operate is a determining factor for their competitiveness, for sustainable growth and, consequently, for their employment performance,
D. ker bi presoja vplivov v okviru nove zakonodaje in poenostavitev obstoječe zakonodaje lahko prispevali k boljši oceni družbenih, gospodarskih in okoljskih vplivov ter vplivov na zdravje ter bi lahko zmanjšali upravno breme, ki škoduje konkurenčnosti evropskih podjetij, zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij (MSP),
D. whereas impact assessment in the context of new legislation and simplification of existing legislation could contribute to a better evaluation of its social, economic, environmental and health effects and could reduce the administrative burden that undermines the competitiveness of European businesses, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs),
E. ker je ugled evropskega zakonodajalcev med državljani in podjetji v EU še daleč od želenega, zlasti ker zakonodaja, ki je pogosto rezultat težavnega političnega kompromisa, ni dovolj jasna in je države članice ne morejo ali nočejo pravilno izvajati,
E. whereas the reputation of the European legislature among citizens and businesses in the EU leaves much to be desired , notably because the legislation, being often a result of difficult political compromise, lacks clarity and Member States are unable or unwilling to implement it correctly,
F. ker Komisija pri pripravi zakonodaje nekaterim zainteresiranim stranem sicer ponuja možnost, da se odzovejo prek posvetovanja in različnih delovnih skupin, ni pa prave preglednosti glede vsebine teh posvetovanj, sodelujočih in tega, kako je njihove rezultate Komisija upoštevala,
F. whereas, in the drafting of legislation, the Commission gives some interested parties the opportunity to react, through consultations and various working groups, but whereas there is insufficient transparency concerning the substance of those consultations, the participants and the manner in which the Commission takes the results thereof into account,
G. ker je Evropski parlament v zgoraj navedeni resoluciji z 20. aprila 2004 z veliko večino podprl uporabo presoje vplivov v EU za izboljšanje zakonodaje in ker sta Svet in Komisija v številnih dokumentih poudarila pomen presoje vplivov,
G. whereas in its above-mentioned resolution of 20 April 2004 the European Parliament declared itself, by a large majority, in favour of the use of impact assessment in the EU in order to improve legislation, and whereas the Council and the Commission have underlined the importance of impact assessment in numerous documents,
H. ker Komisija pri izvajanju presoje vplivov ni dosledna pri uporabi metodologije, zaradi česar niha kakovost presoje vplivov, in ker slednja pogosteje spominja na utemeljitev predloga kot pa na pravo objektivno oceno,
H. whereas the impact assessment carried out by the Commission does not consistently follow the same methodology and is therefore of varying quality, and whereas the impact assessment often resembles a justification of the proposal rather than an actual objective assessment,
I. ker je velik delež izvedbene (oziroma sekundarne) zakonodaje sprejet v postopku komitologije brez ustreznega parlamentarnega nadzora ali presoje vplivov,
I. whereas a great deal of implementing (or secondary) legislation is adopted through the comitology procedure, without proper parliamentary control or impact assessment,
J. ker je zakonodaja deloma učni proces, pri katerem se je mogoče učiti iz narejenih napak; ker vpliv zakonodaje ni dovolj pregleden in ker so poročila Komisije o izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti omejena na izvajanje v državah članicah ter ne nudijo vpogleda v to, ali zakonodaja v praksi dosega zastavljene cilje,
J. whereas legislation is partly a learning process in which it is possible to learn from mistakes made; whereas the impact of legislation is not made sufficiently transparent and whereas reports by the Commission on the implementation of Community legislation are confined to implementation in the Member States and do not give an insight into whether, in practice, the legislation has met the objectives set,
2. podpira željo po izboljšanju evropske zakonodaje za večjo rast in delovna mesta ter poudarja, kako nujen je celovit in skladen pristop pri pobudah za "boljšo pravno ureditev", ki bo podprla tri lizbonske stebre v primeru pomanjkljivega delovanja trga; poudarja, da morajo biti pobude za "boljšo pravno ureditev" izvajane pregledno in demokratično;
Supports the ambition of improving European legislation with a view to enhancing growth and jobs, and stresses the need for an integrated and consistent approach to initiatives on "better regulation", supporting the three Lisbon pillars in case the market fails; stresses that initiatives on "better regulation" must be implemented in a transparent and democratic way;
6. ugotavlja, da bi morala vsak zakonodajni predlog spremljati presoja vplivov, ki je v zgoraj navedeni resoluciji z 20. aprila 2004 opredeljena kot kratek in jasen pregled vplivov po družbeni, gospodarski in okoljski plati ter kot pregled alternativnih politik, ki so zakonodaji na voljo v danih okoliščinah;
Notes the need for every legislative proposal to be accompanied by an impact assessment, which is defined in its above-mentioned resolution of 20 April 2004 as a straightforward mapping-out of the consequences in social, economic and environmental terms, as well as a mapping-out of the policy alternatives that are available to the legislature in that scenario;
12. meni, da je za enotno uporabo presoje vplivov s strani Komisije bistveno, da kakovost presoje vplivov preverja neodvisno nadzorno telo; Evropski parlament ne bo upošteval predlogov, če jih ne bo spremljala presoja vplivov, ki jo je odobrilo neodvisno nadzorno telo;
Considers it essential, in the interests of a uniform application by the Commission of the impact assessment, that the quality of the latter be submitted to independent scrutiny; the European Parliament will not consider any proposals without their being accompanied by an independently scrutinised and approved impact assessment 13.
14. poudarja, da se posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi v pripravljalni fazi razlikuje od pogajanj z njimi med zakonodajnim procesom, ter izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi težnje Komisije, da se dvostransko pogaja s posameznimi državami članicami, preden predstavi zakonodajne predloge, kar včasih pripelje do nenavadnih, neskladnih ali nasprotujočih si določb; možnosti neudeležbe ali izjem za določene države članice, ki izkrivljajo enake konkurenčne pogoje;
Stresses that consulting stakeholders during the preparatory phase is distinct from negotiating with stakeholders during the legislative process, and expresses its concern about the Commission's tendency to hold bilateral negotiations with individual Member States before presenting legislative proposals, which sometimes leads to odd, inconsistent or contradictory provisions, opt-outs or exemptions in favour of particular Member States, distorting the level playing field;
16. ugotavlja, da veliko izvedbene zakonodaje nastane s postopkom komitologije; meni, da mora takšna zakonodaja zadostiti enakim kakovostnim zahtevam kot izvajana zakonodaja in je torej predmet presoje vplivov, potem ko se razvijejo potrebna znanja in orodja;
Notes that much implementing legislation comes into being via the comitology procedure; considers that such legislation must meet the same quality requirements as implemented legislation and will therefore be subject to impact assessment, once the necessary know-how and tools have been developed;
20. ponovno opozarja, da se mora presoja vplivov uporabljati tudi za predloge bistvenih sprememb Parlamenta in Sveta na predloge Komisije in poudarja, da je taka presoja vplivov smiselna samo, če se uporablja enaka metodologija kot pri Komisiji;
Reiterates that Parliament and the Council also make their significant amendments to Commission proposals subject to an impact assessment and stresses that such an impact assessment makes sense only if the same methodology is used as in the case of the Commission;
26. da se zagotovi enoten vseevropski zakonodajni okvir, poziva Komisijo, naj se prepriča, da Svet ne spodkopava tega okvira z množico razveljavitvenih določb, ugodnih za posamezne države članice;
In order to guarantee an EU-wide uniform lawmaking framework, urges the Commission to ensure that this framework is not undermined by the Council through a proliferation of derogatory provisions in favour of individual Member States;
28. poudarja, kako nujno je, da imata Parlament in še posebej odgovorni poročevalec dejavnejšo vlogo pri nadzorovanju izvajanja evropske zakonodaje v državah članicah, pri čemer uporabita mrežo med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi in/ali regionalnimi parlamenti;
Stresses the need for Parliament, and in particular the rapporteur responsible, to play a more active role in monitoring the implementation of European legislation in the Member States, and to make use of the network between the European Parliament and the national and/or regional parliaments;
30. opozarja na zanimive perspektive, ki jih nudi odprta metoda usklajevanja ("open method of coordination") v okviru lizbonske strategije; poudarja svoj interes, da bi bil v celoti obveščen o razvoju te prakse; poziva Komisijo, da predloži poročilo o napredku, doseženem do sedaj s to metodo, ter vztraja, da se odprta metoda usklajevanja ne sme razviti v vzporeden, a prikrit zakonodajni postopek, ki spodkopava postopke iz Pogodbe ES;
Recalls the interesting perspectives afforded by the "open method of coordination" in the context of the Lisbon Strategy; stresses the interest of the European Parliament in being fully informed on the development of this practice; calls on the Commission to submit a report on the progress accomplished to date by this method and insists that the open method of coordination must not evolve into a parallel, but covert, legislative procedure which subverts the procedures laid down in the EC Treaty;
o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2004: uporaba načela subsidiarnosti - dvanajsto letno poročilo
on Better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity - 12th annual report
Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. podpira zakonodajo, ki temelji na načelih in je kakovostno in ne količinsko naravnana: meni, da je razprava o "boljši pravni ureditvi" priložnost za razmislek o tem, da je zakonodaja postopek za doseganje jasno opredeljenih političnih ciljev, ki obvezuje in vključuje vse zainteresirane strani v vseh fazah postopka od priprave do izvajanja;
Promotes legislation based on principles and focused on quality rather than quantity; sees the "better regulation" debate as an occasion on which to reflect on legislation as a process designed to achieve clearly defined policy goals by committing and involving all stakeholders during all phases of the process from preparation to enforcement;
6. opozarja, da morajo metode "boljše pravne ureditve" upoštevati ravnovesje moči med Parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo ter njihove posamezne vloge; želi, da je prispevek Parlamenta preudaren in celovit ter da gradi na pridobljenih izkušnjah; poudarja potrebo po politični podpori inovacijam v zakonodajnem postopku;
Warns that "better regulation" methods should respect the balance of power between and the respective roles of the Parliament, the Council and the Commission; wants the Parliament to make a wise and integrated contribution, building on previous experience; stresses the need for the political endorsement of innovations in the legislative process;
10. poziva Komisijo, da za zagotovitev enotnega zakonodajnega okvira po vsej EU prepreči, da bi ga Svet spodkopal z množico razveljavitvenih določb, ugodnih za posamezne države članice;
In order to guarantee an EU-wide uniform lawmaking framework, urges the Commission to ensure that this framework is not undermined by the Council through a proliferation of derogatory provisions in favour of individual Member States;
12. opominja, da poenostavitev ni samo vprašanje tehnične narave; podpira preusmeritev pravnega reda k trem lizbonskim stebrom, pod pogojem, da se izvede pregledno in demokratično in ne le kot administrativni ukrep; zato poziva k celoviti oceni strategije Komisije;
Recalls that simplification is not simply a technical matter; is in favour of the reorientation of the acquis towards the three Lisbon pillars provided that this is done transparently and democratically and not merely as an administrative act; asks therefore for a full assessment of the Commission's strategy;
14. meni, da bi bilo treba prenos zakonodaje ES spremljati resno in proaktivno, da bi se izognili razhajajočim se razlagam in "prenatrpanosti"; želi, da ima Komisija skupaj z nadzorniki in skupinami strokovnjakov dejavno vlogo pri prenosu, tako na ravni EU kot na nacionalni ravni, saj lahko zgodnja analiza morebitnih pasti prepreči nastanek zamud in nepotrebnih stroškov za podjetja; predlaga, da Parlament sprejme ustrezen postopek za spremljanje prenosa ob tesnem sodelovanju s svojimi nacionalnimi partnerji;
Is of the opinion that transposition of EC legislation should be monitored seriously and proactively in order to avoid diverging interpretations and gold-plating; wants the Commission to play an active role in transposition, together with supervisors and expert groups, both at EU and national level, since early analysis of potential pitfalls may prevent delays and unnecessary burdens on companies; suggests that Parliament sets up a proper transposition-monitoring procedure in close cooperation with its national partners;
Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2004: uporaba načela subsidiarnosti - dvanajsto letno poročilo
Better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity - 12th annual report
Namestniki (člen 178(2)), navzoči pr i končnem glasovanju
Substitute(s) under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote
Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2004: uporaba načela subsidiarnosti – dvanajsto letno poročilo
Better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity – 12th annual report
o izvajanju, posledicah in vplivu veljavne zakonodaje notranjega trga
on the Implementation, Consequences and Impact of the Internal Market Legislation in Force
MNENJE ODBORA ZA EKONOMSKE IN MONETARNE ZADEVE..................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ..............2
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. junija 2002 o presoji vplivov ( KOM(2002)0276 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 5 June 2002 on impact assessment ( COM(2002)0276 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. junija 2002 o akcijskem načrtu „Poenostavitev in izboljšanje zakonodajnega okolja” ( KOM(2002)0278 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 5 June 2002 on the action plan 'Simplifying and improving the regulatory environment' ( COM(2002)0278 ),
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 16. decembra 2003 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 December 2003 on better law-making
1. , ki so ga sprejeli Parlament, Svet in Komisija,
1. concluded between the Parliament, the Council and the Commission,