natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Glede na pomembnost in področje ukrepa ESPG lahko pride do izjem v pravilu proti dvojnim finančnim virom Skupnosti.
Depending on the importance and scope of the EGF action, there may be exemptions to the rule against double Community funding sources.
Drugi strukturni skladi ne bodo mogli prispevati k financiranju iz ESPG.
Other Structural Funds will not be able to contribute to EGF funding.
Vendar je Evropski socialni sklad izjema, ker daje prednost predvidevanju, prilagajanju in pozitivnemu obvladovanju sprememb z večjo prilagodljivostjo delavcev in podjetij, boljšim dostopom do zaposlitve in sodelovanjem na trgu dela ipd.
However, the European Social Fund is an exception as it prioritises anticipation, adaptation and positive management of change through increasing adaptability of workers and enterprises, enhancing access to employment and participation in the labour market etc..
Po drugi strani pa ESPG dopolnjuje obstoječe politike in finančne instrumente, vključno s politikami Skupnosti, usmerjenimi v priprave na prestrukturiranje in njegovo spremljanje, tako da združuje ozemeljsko razsežnost s posebno in usmerjeno pomočjo, osredotočeno izključno na osebno svetovanje za ponovno vključitev delavcev, ki jih je prizadel razvoj mednarodnih trgovinskih tokov, v delovno razmerje.
The EGF from it's side, complements existing policies and financial instruments, including the Community policies aiming at anticipating and accompanying restructuring and does this in combining a territorial dimension with specific and targeted assistance, focused exclusively on personalised support for the re-integration into employment of workers adversely affected by the evolution of international trade patterns.
Z vidika državljanov, na katere to vpliva, začasno upravno financiranje enakega ukrepa ni podvajanje ukrepov, ki se izvajajo v okviru drugih politik Skupnosti, in zato mora to biti edina izjema pravila o izključevanju dvojnega financiranja.
Seen from the concerned citizens, administrative temporary funding of the same action is no duplication of actions carried out under other Community policies, and this therefore has to be the one exemption on the rule on excluding double financing.
Za izvajanje pomoči iz ESPG niso potrebne dodatne upravne strukture;
No additional tier of administration is needed to implement EGF assistance;
ESPG se lahko uporabi tudi za vzpostavitev evropske spletne strani in za okrepitev vloge Evropskega centra za spremljanje sprememb.
The EGF may also be used to create a European Internet site and to strengthen the role of the european monitoring centre on change (EMCC).
Državljanom EU je treba zagotoviti obsežne informacije o skladu ESPG, da bodo iz njega ustrezno in solidarnostno uporabljena sredstva za državljane, ki so bili žrtve odpuščanj in so se znašli v negotovih razmerah.
EU citizens should be provided with wide-ranging information on the EGF so that it can be applied responsibly and in a spirit of solidarity vis-à-vis citizens affected by redundancy and in a precarious situation.
Na podlagi okrepljene vloge Evropskega centra za spremljanje sprememb na področju raziskav bo možno predvideti številne težave na regionalni in sektorski ravni, ki so povezane z globalizacijo.
Strengthening the research role of the European Monitoring Centre on Change will make it possible to anticipate many of the regional and sectoral problems arising from globalisation.
S tem poudari vlogo tako Skupnosti kot države članice in zagotovi prepoznavnost prispevka iz ESPG.
It shall highlight the roles of both the Community and the Member State and ensure that the contribution from the EGF is visible.
Z ukrepi za presežne delavce se bodo ukvarjale tako države članice kot Skupnost.
Actions towards redundant workers will be dealt with by both the Member State and the Community.
Da bi delavcem zagotovili pravilne informacije, je treba to sodelovanje omeniti v informacijah in publikacijah ESPG.
In order to provide workers with correct information this co-operation should be mentioned in information and publications on the EGF.
Kadar na podlagi ocene, izvedene v skladu s členom 5(5), Komisija sklene, da so pogoji za finančni prispevek v okviru te uredbe izpolnjeni, čim prej začne postopek iz člena 12.
Where, on the basis of the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 5(5), the Commission has concluded that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met ; it shall initiate the procedure set out in Article 12 as soon as possible .
Kadar na podlagi ocene, izvedene v skladu s členom 5(5), Komisija sklene, da so pogoji za finančni prispevek v okviru te uredbe izpolnjeni, začne postopek iz člena 12.
Where, on the basis of the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 5(5), the Commission has concluded that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met ; it shall initiate the procedure set out in Article 12.
Postopek je treba začeti nemudoma, zato ne sme biti uporabljen dvomljiv izraz "čim prej".
The procedure should be initiated immediately and should not be subject to the arbitrary decision implied by the expression 'as soon as possible'.
Če ob predložitvi predloga v skladu s členom 5 preostala finančna sredstva, ki so v tistem letu na voljo ESPG, ne zadostujejo za stroške finančne pomoči, ocenjene kot potrebne, lahko Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu, ki izvaja finančni nadzor, predlaga, da se razlika zagotovi iz proračunskih sredstev sklada, predvidenih za naslednji dve leti.
If, where a proposal has been submitted pursuant to Article 5, the remaining financial resources available for the EFG in that year are not sufficient to cover the amount of financial assistance considered necessary, the Commission may propose to the European Parliament, which exercises budgetary control, that the difference be financed through additional EFG appropriations relating to the two following years.
Ta mehanizem je treba uporabiti ob upoštevanju podobnih določb za Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije.
Provision should be made for this mechanism in the light of the corresponding arrangements for the European Union Solidarity Fund.
Poročilo vsebuje zlasti informacije v zvezi s predloženimi vlogami, sprejetimi sklepi, financiranimi ukrepi in zaključkom odobrenega finančnega prispevka in z doseženimi rezultati.
The report shall in particular contain information relating to applications submitted, Decisions adopted, actions funded and the winding-up of financial contribution made as well as to the results achieved .
Če ciljev ESPG ni mogoče izpolniti z razpoložljivim letnim zneskom, Komisija predlaga ponovno prilagoditev.
Where it is found that EGF objectives are not being met with the available annual amount, the Commission shall propose a readjustment.
Da bi ugotovili, v kakšni meri razpoložljivi znesek zadostuje za izpolnjevanje ciljev, za katere je bil Sklad ustanovljen, je treba oceniti delovanje Sklada.
The performance of the Fund must be evaluated in order to establish to what extent the amount available is sufficient to meet the objectives for which this Fund was created.
o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Gérarda Onestaja
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Gérard Onesta
PE 378.639v01-00
PE 378.639v03-00
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Monice Frassoni za zaščito imunitete Gérarda Onestaja v zvezi s kazenskim postopkom, sproženim proti njemu pred tretjim senatom kazenskega pritožbenega sodišča v Toulouseu v Franciji, ki je bila vložena 17. maja 2006 in razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 31. maja 2006,
– having regard to the request by Monica Frassoni for defence of the immunity of Gérard Onesta in connection with the criminal proceedings brought against the latter before the Third Chamber of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Toulouse, France, made on 17 May 2006, announced in plenary sitting on 31 May 2006,
– po zaslišanju Gérarda Onestaja v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
– having heard Gérard Onesta in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju člena 8 in člena 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 in člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– ob upoštevanju člena 26 Ustave Republike Francije,
– having regard to Article 26 of the Constitution of the French Republic,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6–0386/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0386/2006 ),
A. ker je Gérard Onesta poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, v katerega je bil izvoljen na šestih neposrednih volitvah, ki so potekale med 10. in 13. junijem 2004, in ker je Parlament veljavnost njegovega mandata preveril 14. decembra 2004
A. whereas Gérard Onesta is a Member of the European Parliament who was elected in the sixth direct elections of 10 to 13 June 2004 and whereas his credentials were verified by Parliament on 14 December 2004
B. ker poslanci med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države, in ker sklicevanje na imuniteto ni mogoče, kadar je poslanec zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja; ker to Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanje pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu članu
B. whereas, during the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament and whereas immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is caught in the act of committing an offence; whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members
C. ker je določba, ki se jo uporablja v zadevnem primeru, drugi pododstavek člena 26 francoske ustave, ki določa, da se brez dovoljenja predsedstva skupščine, katere član je, nobenega člana poslanca ne sme prijeti zaradi težjega kaznivega dejanja ali druge večje kršitve, niti se ne sme poti njemu izvršiti kakršnega koli drugega zapornega ukrepa ali ukrepa omejevanja svobode; ker takšno dovoljenje ni potrebno v primeru težjega kaznivega dejanja ali če je bil storilec zaloten pri drugi večji kršitvi ali če je sodba pravnomočna,
C. whereas the provision applicable to the case in question is Article 26, second subparagraph, of the French Constitution, pursuant to which no Member of Parliament shall be arrested for a serious crime or other major offence, nor shall he be subjected to any other custodial or semi-custodial measure, without the authorization of the Bureau of the assembly of which he is a member; whereas such authorization shall not be required in the case of a serious crime or other major offence committed flagrante delicto or a final sentence,
D. ker je kazensko prizivno sodišče v Toulouseu obsodilo Gérarda Onestaja na tri mesece zaporne kazni in torej izreklo strožjo kazen, kot je bila tista, ki je bila izrečena drugemu obtožencu, in ker je isto sodišče svoji različni sodbi utemeljilo s trditvijo, da je imel Gérard Onesta v svoji vlogi poslanca, bolj kot kateri koli drugi državljan na voljo sredstva, da pride do besede na političnih forumih, zlasti ob podpori ostalih izvoljenih članov njegove stranke, njegove poslanske skupine v skupščini in po potrebi tudi medijev, saj je – po navedbah francoskega sodišča – strokovnjak na področju umetnosti komunikacije,
D. whereas the Court of Criminal Appeals of Toulouse sentenced Gérard Onesta to three months' imprisonment, thus applying a stricter sanction than the one reserved to the other accused and whereas the self same court justified this different decision by stating that, in his capacity as Member of a Parliament, Gérard Onesta had, more so than any other citizen, the means available to make his voice heard in political fora, in particular with the support of other elected members of his party, his group in the Assembly and, if necessary, the media, as he is, according to the French court, an expert in the art of communication,
E. ker strožje kaznovanje Gérarda Onestaja zgolj zaradi njegovega položaja poslanca predstavlja očitno diskriminacijo do izvoljenih politikov, saj se zdi, da slednjim ni dovoljeno sodelovati na javnih protestih enako kot ostalim državljanom, ker imajo na voljo druga, bolj učinkovita sredstva izražanja; ker bi to lahko pripeljalo do nesprejemljivega zaključka, da lahko poslanci parlamenta lahko delujejo le v okvirih političnih skupščin ter da zunaj teh forumov uživajo manj pravic in imajo na voljo manj sredstev izražanja kot drugi državljani,
E. whereas punishing Gérard Onesta more severely only in view of his status as Member of a Parliament constitutes a clear discrimination against elected politicians, in so far as it seems that, since they have other and more effective means of expression, they are not permitted to engage in public demonstrations in the same way as other citizens and whereas this would therefore entail the unacceptable conclusion that Members of a Parliament are only allowed to act in political assemblies and that, outside those fora, they enjoy fewer rights and means of expression than any other citizen,
Onesta trdi, da je bil njegov namen usmeriti pozornost na dejstvo, da je Evropsko sodišče spoznalo Francijo za krivo, ker v svojo zakonodajo ni prenesla direktive 2001/18/ES, ki jo je sprejel Evropski parlament,
G. whereas Mr Onesta maintains that his intention was to draw attention to the fact that the European Court of Justice found against France for failing to transpose the directive 2001/18/CE adopted by European Parliament,
H. ker je ta zadeva izredno občutljiva in so njene posledice glede pooblastil in pristojnosti Evropskega parlament nesprejemljive, saj je treba odločno obsoditi diskriminatorni odnos francoskega sodišča in posledično politično oškodovanje državljanskih pravic Gérarda Onestaja,
H. whereas the issue at stake is extremely delicate and its consequences for the prerogatives of the European Parliament are unacceptable, as the discriminatory attitude of the French court and the resulting political prejudice to Gérard Onesta's civil rights are to be strongly deplored,
J. ker je vsak primer političnega preganjanja poslancev Evropskega parlamenta napad na integriteto te politične ustanove, ki so jo na demokratičen način izvolili evropski narodi, ter je to mogoče razumeti kot zaničevanje Parlamenta, in ker je Evropski parlament kot demokratična ustanova dolžan braniti svoja pooblastila in pristojnosti z vsemi sredstvi, ki jih ima na voljo,
J. whereas any case of political persecution of one of its Members is an attack on the integrity of the European Parliament as a political institution, democratically elected by the peoples of Europe, and amounts to a contempt of Parliament and whereas, as a democratic institution, the European Parliament is bound to defend its prerogatives using all the means at its disposal,
K. obžaluje dejstvo, da Protokol o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 v sedanji obliki Evropskemu parlamentu ne omogoča sprejetja zavezujočih ukrepov za zaščito Gérarda Onestaja in se zato odloči, da ne zaščiti njegove imunitete.
1 Regrets that, as it stands, the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965 does not afford the European Parliament the means of taking binding action in order to protect Gérard Onesta and therefore decides not to defend his immunity.
25 julija 2005 se je okoli 400 ljudi zbralo v Menvillu (vas blizu francoskega mesta Toulouse), kjer so nameravali protestirati proti genetsko spremenjeni hrani, in uničilo polje koruze, veliko približno 13 000 m 2 .
On 25 July 2005, about 400 people gathered in Menville (a village near the French city of Toulouse), where they intended to demonstrate against genetically modified food and destroyed a field of maize measuring about 13.000 sq.m.
Ne glede na sodelovanje tako velikega števila ljudi so se tožilci iz Toulousea odločili obtožiti le devet protestnikov, proti dvema izmed njih, Gérardu Onestaju, poslancu v Evropskem parlamentu, in Noëlu Mamèru, poslancu v francoskem parlamentu, pa so sprožili poseben postopek, ki se uporablja proti storilcem kaznivih dejanj, zalotenih pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja.
Notwithstanding the participation of such a large number of people, the prosecutors of Toulouse decided to incriminate nine demonstrators only, two of whom, Gérard Onesta, MEP and Noël Mamère, MP, were submitted to the special procedure applicable to offenders found in the act of committing a crime.
S sodbo z dne 15. novembra 2005 je tretji senat kazenskega prizivnega sodišča v Toulouseu (v izvirniku troisième Chambre des appels correctionnels ), ki je pristojno za to zadevo, obsodil Gérarda Onestaja na trimesečno zaporno kazen in mu naložil plačilo sodnih stroškov, plačilo odškodnine oškodovanim stranem ter povračilo stroškov, ki so jih oškodovane strani imele zaradi svojega sodelovanja in pravnega zastopanja v postopku.
By decision of 15 November 2005, the third chamber of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Toulouse (in French, troisième Chambre des appels correctionnels ), within whose competence this issue lay, sentenced Mr Onesta to a period of imprisonment of three months and ordered him to pay the costs of the proceedings, to pay compensation to the aggrieved parties and to refund to the aggrieved parties the costs of joining the proceedings and of legal representation therein.
Medtem ko je bil eden od obtožencev oproščen, so bili ostali obsojeni na zaporne kazni v dolžini od dveh do štirih mesecev, poleg tega pa jim je bila naložena obveznost plačila odškodnine in nadomestila oškodovanim stranem.
While one accused was acquitted, the others were sentenced to periods of imprisonment ranging from two to four months, in addition to the obligation of compensating and refunding the aggrieved parties.
22. marca 2006 je poslanka EP Monica Frassoni pisala predsedniku Borrellu, da bi opozorila na protisloven in na videz diskriminatoren odnos omenjenega sodišča do Gérarda Onestaja (in po mnenju slednjega tudi do Noëla Mamèra).
On 22 March 2006, Ms Monica Frassoni, MEP, wrote a letter to President Borrell in order to denounce the contradictory and apparently discriminatory attitude held by the above-mentioned court against Mr Onesta (and, as far as he was concerned, against Mr Mamère).
Predsednik Borrell je to pismo nato posredoval Odboru za pravne zadeve, da bi zagotovil poglobljeno analizo zadeve.
President Borrell then transmitted this letter to the committee on legal affairs to ensure an in-depth analysis of this issue.
Monica Frassoni je v svojem pismu poudarila, da:
In her letter, Ms Frassoni highlighted that:
Mamère, poslanec francoskega parlamenta, obsojena na zaporno kazen, daljšo od tiste, ki je bila izrečena ostalim obtoženim, z izjemo Joséja Bovéja, ki ga je sodišče obravnavalo kot večkratnega povratnika;
· only Mr Onesta, MEP, and Mr Mamère, MP, were sentenced to a period of imprisonment longer than the one applied to all the other accused, except for Mr Bové, who was considered as an habitual offender by the court;
· kazensko prizivno sodišče v Toulouseu je razsodilo v nasprotju z običajnim pristopom francoskih sodišč do podobnih protestov, ko so bili obtoženi vedno oproščeni na osnovi podmene, da so delovali z namenom, da preprečijo nevarnost (v izvirniku: état de nécessité ).
· the Court of Criminal Appeals of Toulouse contradicted the traditional approach of French courts as regards similar demonstrations, where the accused had always been acquitted because they were deemed to have acted in the need to avoid danger (in French, état de nécessité ).
ZAKONODAJA IN SPLOŠNE OPAZKE V ZVEZI Z IMUNITETO
LAW AND GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE IMMUNITY OF
Kot je znano, se člena 8 in 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti (PPI)(
As known, Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities (PPI)(
(1) Protokoli, ki so priloženi k pogodbam, tvorijo del osnovne zakonodaje Skupnosti in imajo enak pravni status kot pogodbe same.
() The protocols annexed to the original Treaties form part of primary Community law and have the same legal status as the Treaties themselves.
Iz sodbe v primeru, povezanem z odgovornostjo uradnikov Skupnosti za davek na nepremičnine, je jasno razvidno, da kršitev določb protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah pomeni kršitev obvez, ki izhajajo iz pogodb (sodba z. dne 24. februarja 1988, Komisija proti Belgiji, primer 260/86, ECR). ) glasita:
The judgment in a case concerning the liability of Community officials for property tax made clear that a breach of the provisions of the PPI represented a breach of the obligations arising out of the Treaties (judgment of 24 February 1988, Commission v. Belgium , Case 260/86, ECR.
Člen 8
966). ) read as follows:
Med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njegovi člani:
During the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members shall enjoy:
a) uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane članom parlamenta te države;
a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;
b) na ozemlju vseh drugih držav članic ne morejo biti priprti ali v sodnem postopku.
b) in the territory of any other Member State , immunity from any measure of detention and from legal proceedings.
Kadar je član zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja, sklicevanje na imuniteto ni mogoče in Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu članu.
Immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is found in the act of committing an offence and shall not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members.
Obseg poslanske imunitete v Franciji je zelo podoben tistemu, ki zagotavlja delovanje EP in temelji na PPI.
The scope of the parliamentary immunity in France is very similar to the one that serves the functioning of the EP, based on the PPI.
Člen 26 francoske Ustave določa naslednje:
Article 26 of the French Constitution reads as follows:
Poslanca se ne sme kazensko preganjati, preiskovati, prijeti, pripreti ali mu soditi zaradi mnenj ali glasov, ki jih je izrekel pri izvajanju svojih dolžnosti.
No Member of Parliament shall be prosecuted, investigated, arrested, detained or tried in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast in the exercise of his duties.
Poslanca se ne sme prijeti zaradi težjega kaznivega dejanja ali druge resne kršitve, niti se ne sme poti njemu izvršiti kakršnega koli drugega zapornega ukrepa ali ukrepa omejevanja svobode brez dovoljenja predsedstva skupščine, katere član je.
No Member of Parliament shall be arrested for a serious crime or other major offence, nor shall he be subjected to any other custodial or semi-custodial measure, without the authorization of the Bureau of the assembly of which he is a member.
Takšno dovoljenje ni potrebno v primeru težjega kaznivega dejanja ali če je bil storilec zaloten (flagrante delicto) pri drugi večji kršitvi ali če je sodba pravnomočna.
Such authorization shall not be required in the case of a serious crime or other major offence committed flagrante delicto or a final sentence.
Pripor, zaporni ukrepi ali ukrepi omejevanja svobode ali kazensko preganjanje poslanca se ustavijo za čas trajanja zasedanja, če skupščina, katere poslanec je, tako zahteva.
The detention, subjection to custodial or semi-custodial measures, or prosecution of a Member of Parliament shall be suspended for the duration of the session if the assembly of which he is a member so requires.
Zadevna skupščina je upravičena, da po potrebi skliče dodatne seje in s tem omogoči uporabo prejšnjega odstavka.
The assembly concerned shall convene as of right for additional sittings in order to permit the preceding paragraph to be applied should circumstances so require.