natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
17. poziva EU naj zagotovi razpoložljivost potrebnih proračunskih sredstev (poleg tistih, ki so že namenjena za razvojno pomoč tretjim državam) za povečanje zmogljivosti za zaščito na finančni in institucionalni ravni v državah v razvoju, ki so pripravljene deliti odgovornost z EU na tem področju;
Calls on the EU to ensure that the necessary budgetary means, other than those already envisaged as development aid to third countries, would be made available to enhance financial and institutional protection capacities in developing countries that are ready to share responsibility with the EU in this field;
Meni, da mora biti delitev pristojnosti in odgovornosti med vpletenimi agencijami na tem področju jasna;
Considers it necessary for there to be clear lines of responsibility and accountability for the agencies involved;
19 Meni, da je odločna skupna zunanja in varnostna politika, s katero se EU zaveže, da bo njena prednostna naloga reševanje dolgotrajnih sporov in preprečevanje sporov, nujno potrebna za pomoč osebam, ki iščejo zaščito; zato pozdravlja predlog Komisije za določitev programov EU za regionalno zaščito in prosi za mesto v njihovem razvoju in pri potrebnem ocenjevanju in spremljanju njihovega izvajanja;
19 Considers that a decisive common foreign and security policy committing the EU as a matter of priority to the resolution of long-term conflicts and conflict prevention is essential in order to help those seeking protection; therefore welcomes the Commission’s proposals to bring forward EU Regional Protection Programmes and asks to be involved in their development and in the necessary assessment and monitoring of their implementation;
21. poudarja, da povečanje zmogljivosti za zaščito v njihovih regijah in oblikovanje postopkov za zaščiteni vstop prispevata k zagotovitvi urejenega in predvidljivega vstopa v EU, hkrati pa se ohrani obstoječa pravica do prošnje za azil na podlagi spontanega prihoda v eno izmed držav članic EU.
Stresses that enhancing protection capacity in the regions of origin and creation of the Protected Entry Procedures leads to ensuring an orderly and anticipated manner of entry into the EU, while further maintaining the existing right of application for asylum upon spontaneous arrival in an EU Member State.
23. meni, da bi morala biti Evropska unija bolje pripravljena na zagotavljanje nujne pomoči tistim državam, ki mejijo na države v krizi, in jim v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi pomagati pri obvladovanju nenadnih in množičnih selitev, ki so posledica kriznih razmer;
Believes that the European Union should be better prepared to provide urgent assistance to the countries neighbouring states in crisis, in order to help them to address sudden and numerous migration resulting from crisis situations in accordance with international standards;
Priznava vrednost podpiranja držav, ki sprejmejo večino iskalcev zatočišča, in meni, da morajo pogoji v teh zatočiščih ustrezati vsaj merilom, ki jih je Komisija zapisala v točkah a) in e) člena 45 sporočila ( KOM(2004)0410 );
Recognises the value of supporting those countries which receive the majority of those seeking sanctuary and considers it important that the conditions offered there meet at least those outlined by the Commission in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 45 of communication COM(2004)0410 ;
Meni, da bo vlaganje truda v trajne rešitve zahtevalo precej usklajevanja med različnimi oddelki in agencijami Komisije, predvsem oddelki za razvoj, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, trgovino in AFET; verjame, da mora Komisija svoje predloge za tako sodelovanje karseda kmalu sporočiti Parlamentu in mu redno poročati o napredovanju sodelovanja;
Considers that the investment in durable solutions will require considerable coordination between different departments and agencies of the Commission, and especially those concerned with development, justice and home affairs, trade and external relations; believes that the Commission should communicate its proposals for such cooperation to the Parliament as soon as possible and report regularly to Parliament on the progress of such cooperation;
Pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije ( KOM(2004)0503 ), katerega namen je razviti proces, ki bi odpravil vrzel na področju zaščite in bo pripeljal do učinkovite izvedbe prve faze skupne azilne politike;
Welcomes the Commission's submission of the communication COM(2004)0503 , the purpose of which is to develop the process which would close the protection gap and lead to the effective implementation of the first stage of the common asylum policy;
Pozdravlja predlog vnaprejšnjega zbiranja vseh ustreznih informacij za postopek odobritve azila, a poudarja, da morajo biti vključene popolne informacije o državi iz različnih virov, kakovostno usposabljanje oseb, ki odločajo o prošnjah, in polno pravno zastopstvo prosilcev, informacije v maternem jeziku prosilca in pravica do vložitve prošnje v ciljni državi;
Welcomes the proposal to 'front-load' the assessment procedure to include all relevant information but stresses that this must include the application of full-country information from a variety of sources, high-quality training for those deciding on applications and the full legal representation of applicants, information provided in the applicant’s own language and the right to in-country appeal;
V pomoč kakovosti sprejemanja odločitev za azil v prihodnosti predlaga, da morajo biti sistemi na mestu za spremljanje okoliščin oseb, ki se vrnejo v državo izvora, potem ko je bila njihova pritožba označena kot neutemeljena, da lahko oceni, ali je bila sprejeta pravilna odločitev;
To aid the future quality of asylum decision-making, proposes that systems be put in place to monitor the outcome for those returned to their country of origin when their claim has been deemed unfounded, in order to assess whether correct decisions have been made;
Poudarja potrebo po usklajenih pristopih, splošnih načrtih dejavnosti in posebnih sporazumih, ki bi oblikovali in zagotavljali učinkovito odzivanje za zaščito beguncev in/ali dosegali trajne rešitve v državah izvora, strategije za najboljše prakse v vodenju upravnih aktov in dovoljevali izmenjavo podatkov o državah izvora in poreklu;.
Stresses the need to devise harmonised approaches, general action plans and special agreements capable of formulating and guaranteeing effective responses for the protection of refugees and/or achieving lasting solutions in the countries of origin, strategies which take account of best practices in the management of administrative acts and allow the exchange of information on the countries of origin and provenance;
Podpira predlog enotnega postopka za mednarodno zaščito, ker je prepričan, da se z enotnim postopkom, ki ga vodi en sam pristojni organ, omogoči hitrejši in učinkovitejši potek postopka ter zagotovijo večje garancije za osebe, ki iščejo zaščito; en sam organ bi namreč ocenil potrebe prosilca po mednarodni zaščiti, z namenom dodelitve statusa begunca oziroma pomožne zaščite ali, če je to primerno, da bi zavrnil njegovo prošnjo;
Backs the proposal for a single procedure for international protection, since it is convinced that a single procedure administered by a single competent authority will save economic resources, but above all will make the procedure swifter and more efficient and provide better guarantees for persons seeking protection, since the single authority would assess the international protection needs of the applicant, either in order to grant him refugee status or subsidiary protection or, if appropriate, turn down his application;
Prav tako predlaga, da EU vzpostavi pospešen postopek za odobritev azila, ki ne bi trajal več kot 6 mesecev, zaradi katerega bi bilo lažje ravnati z neupravičenimi prošnjami, in to bi pomenilo poenostavitev formalnosti za prošnje, ki dejansko izpolnjujejo zahteve za odobren azil;
Also requests that the EU should have an accelerated procedure for granting asylum, taking not more than 6 months, which would make it easier to deal with unjustified applications and thus streamline formalities for those which actually meet the requirements for the granting of asylum;
Zahteva, da se v primerih zavrnitve katerega koli statusa mednarodne zaščite zaradi neizpolnjevanja pogojev primerno utemelji negativno odločitev in da se jo pisno sporoči v overjenem dokumentu v maternem jeziku prosilca;
Requests that in cases where any of the types of status of international protection should be refused because the requirements are not met, the unfavourable decision should be duly reasoned and communicated in writing in an authenticated document in the applicant's own language;
Priporočam, sklepanje sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu s tretjimi državami izvora za osebe, ki iščejo azil v EU, kar bi pospešilo repatriacijo iskalcev azila, ki so zavrnjeni, ker ne izpolnjujejo pogojev; prav tako zagovarja vključitev klavzul o ponovnem sprejemu v sporazume o trgovini in pridružitvi s tretjimi državami;
Urges that readmission agreements be concluded with the third countries of origin of those seeking asylum in the EU, which would speed up the repatriation of asylum-seekers who are rejected because they do not meet the requirements; also advocates the inclusion of readmission clauses in trade and association agreements with third countries;
Je prepričan, da enotni postopek ne bo negativno vplival na status beguncev, predviden v Ženevski konvenciji iz leta 1951, če bo vlogo obravnaval isti organ po predhodno določenem postopku: zahteva bi bila najprej obravnavana na podlagi razlogov za zaščito, določenih v Ženevski konvenciji in v primeru, da se ti ne morejo uporabljati, bi bilo potrebno določiti, ali se uporabijo razlogi, ki opravičujejo dodelitev pomožne zaščite;
Is convinced that a single procedure would not adversely affect the status of refugees as envisaged in the Geneva Convention of 1951, if the application is examined by the same authority in a set order: firstly, the request would be examined on the basis of the reasons for protection laid down in the Geneva Convention, and if these are not applicable, it would be determined whether the reasons justifying the granting of subsidiary protection apply;
Izraža globoko zaskrbljenost glede resnega položaja, ki bo neizogibno nastal v prihodnosti, če bodo morale po eni strani države članice uporabiti direktivo 2004/83/EC z dne 29. aprila 2004, za vzpostavitev minimalnih standardov za priznanje statusa državljanov tretjih držav kot beguncev ali oseb ki potrebujejo drugačno obliko mednarodne zaščite in vsebini dodeljene pomoči
Expresses its deep concern at the serious situation which will inevitably arise in future if, on the one hand, Member States have to apply Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted
12. , katere področje uporabe pokriva dva tipa mednarodne zaščite (zaščita za begunce in pomožna zaščita), medtem ko po drugi strani bodoča direktiva Sveta o minimalnih standardih za postopek dodelitve in odvzema statusa begunca v državah članicah omejuje svoje področje uporabe na obravnavo prošenj za mednarodno zaščito, ki temeljijo na razlogih, navedenih v Ženevski konvenciji iz leta 1951 in njenem Protokolu iz leta 1967, saj so prošnje za pomožno zaščito izven njenega področja uporabe;
12. , the scope of which covers the two types of international protection (refugees and subsidiary protection), whilst, on the other hand, the scope of the future directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status is confined to the examination of applications for international protection based on the reasons listed in the Geneva Convention of 1951 and the Protocol of 1967, since applications for subsidiary protection are outside its scope;
Poziva Evropsko unijo, naj primerno ukrepa, da bi zagotovila, da se področje uporabe direktive o minimalnih standardih za postopek dodelitve ali odvzema statusa begunca v državah članicah razširi na primere pomožne zaščite, tako da bi med obravnavo svojih prošenj za mednarodno zaščito vsi imeli enake postopkovne garancije v vseh državah članicah ter enake možnosti, da se branijo in izvršujejo pravico do pritožbe;
Calls on the European Union to take appropriate steps to ensure that the scope of the directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status is extended to cases of subsidiary protection, so as to give everybody the same procedural guarantees in all the Member States during the examination of their applications for international protection and the same opportunities to defend themselves and exercise their right to appeal against decisions which they consider unlawful, and that such appeals should have the effect of suspending the decision;
Je prepričan, da bo na področju zaščite nastala neopravičljiva zakonodajna vrzel v primeru, da obseg direktive o minimalnih standardih za postopek dodelitve ali odvzema statusa begunca v državah članicah ne bo razširjen na primere, ki opravičujejo zahteve po pomožni zaščiti; posledice le-tega bi poslabšalo dejstvo, da države članice raje odobrijo pomožno zaščito na podlagi razlogov za pomožno zaščito kot na podlagi tistih razlogov, ki opravičujejo uporabo Ženevske konvencije za dodelitev statusa begunca;
Is convinced that if the Directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status is not extended to cases justifying requests for subsidiary protection this would constitute an unjustifiable legal vacuum in the field of protection, the consequences of which would be aggravated by the fact that when the Member States grant international protection they do so on the basis of the reasons for subsidiary protection rather than on those justifying the application of the Geneva Convention on the granting of refugee status;
Zahteva, da Svet nujno objavi, kdaj se bo Parlament ponovno posvetoval o Direktivi o minimalnih standardih v zvezi s postopki v državah članicah za podelitev ali odvzem statusa begunca in najmanjšem skupnem seznamu varnih držav izvora;
Demands that the Council indicate urgently when Parliament will be consulted again on the Directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status and about any minimum common list of safe countries of origin;
Meni, da bo morala Evropska unija po pripravljalni fazi čim prej sprejeti zakonodajne ukrepe, potrebne za sprejem celotnega zakonodajnega svežnja, predvidenega v Amsterdamski pogodbi in na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Tampereju z namenom oblikovanja prve faze skupne evropske azilne politike, da bi zagotovili pošteno in učinkovito uporabo enotnega postopka mednarodne zaščite v vseh državah članicah;
Maintains that, as soon as possible after the preparatory stage, the European Union should adopt the legislative measures needed to adopt the whole legislative package envisaged in the Amsterdam Treaty and by the Tampere European Council for the creation of the first phase of a European common asylum policy, in order to ensure the fair and effective application of a single international protection procedure in all the Member States;
Ne vidi razloga za prenos odgovornosti za odločitve v zvezi s prošnjami za azil iz držav članic na osrednji EU organ ali v centre za obdelovanje podatkov EU, saj bi zaradi tega prišlo do pravnih, praktičnih in političnih težav;
Sees no case for transferring responsibility for deciding asylum claims from the Member States to a central EU authority or EU asylum processing centres in view of the legal, practical and political difficulties;
Verjame, da je integracija temeljni del vsakega učinkovitega azilnega sistema in shem za preseljevanje na ravni EU, ter da je integracija dvosmerni postopek, ki vključuje prosilce za azil in/ali begunce ter gostiteljico;
Believes that integration is a fundamental part of any efficient asylum system and EU‑wide resettlement schemes and that integration is a two-way process involving both the asylum-seeker and/or refugee and the host society;
Verjame, da mora učinkovita evropska azilna politika temeljiti na skupni analizi fenomena selitve, in da je zbiranje, izmenjav in uporaba sodobnih podatkov ter podatkov o ustreznih selitvenih razvojih zelo pomembno;
Believes that an effective European asylum policy should be based on a common analysis of migratory phenomena and that the collection, exchange and use of up-to-date information and data on all relevant migratory developments are of importance;
Pozdravlja vzpostavitev Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2005–2010 in poudarja, da je nujno potrebno, da države članice vzdržujejo azilne sisteme in objekte za sprejem v pripravah na ustanovitev skupnega azilnega postopka;
Welcomes the establishment of the European Refugee Fund for 2005-2010 and stresses the urgent need for Member States to maintain adequate asylum systems and reception facilities in the run-up to the establishment of the common asylum procedure;
Verjame, da mora EU storiti več za spodbujanje razmer, v katerih se lahko prosilci za azil in begunci varno, dostojanstveno in trajno prostovoljno vrnejo;
Believes the EU must do more to foster conditions which make it possible for asylum‑seekers and refugees to undertake safe, dignified and sustainable voluntary returns;
Na splošno vaša poročevalka pozdravlja obe sporočili Komisije o razvoju skupne azilne politike v prihodnosti.
In general, your rapporteur welcomes these two communications from the Commission concerning the future development of a common asylum policy.
Kljub temu se ji zdi pomembno za to vzpostaviti jasen okvir.
She feels it important, however, to establish a clear framework for such future development.
Parlament stalno poudarja potrebo po kakovostnem azilnem postopku, ki je trdno zasnovan v okviru Ženevske konvencije in drugih mednarodnih instrumentov.
Parliament has repeatedly stressed the need for a high quality asylum procedure, firmly entrenched in the Geneva Convention and other international instruments.
Smo enakega mnenja glede oseb, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito (pomožna zaščita).
We took the same view with regard to those in need of international protection (subsidiary protection).
Pri ocenjevanju katerega koli sistema sta pomembni hitrost in upravna učinkovitost, vendar le-ti ne moreta biti edino merilo, ko je v nevarnosti prihodnost ljudi.
Speed and administrative efficiency are important in assessing any system but they cannot be the only criteria when people’s futures are at risk.
Trenutne številke o neosnovanih prošnjah za azil so pogosto popačene, saj pogosto ne vključujejo primerov, ki so zavrnjeni po pritožbi ali so neustrezno ocenjeni zaradi hitrega postopka na podlagi dvomljive ocene "varnih držav".
The current figures for non-founded asylum claims are often misrepresented as they frequently omit those cases overturned on appeal or inadequately assessed after being fast-tracked through a dubious 'safe-country' assessment.
Tako je predlog Komisije vnaprejšnjega zbiranja vseh ustreznih informacij za postopek odobritve azila dobrodošel: skupni proces, ki vključuje vse informacije, ki so potem ocenjene najprej po merilih za poln status begunca in, le če ta ni pridobljen, za pomožno zaščito, poenostavlja proces za prosilca in administracijo.
Thus the Commission’s proposal to 'front-load' the assessment process is a welcome one: a single procedure which contains all the information and which is assessed firstly on the basis of the criteria for full refugee status and then, only if those are not met, on a subsidiary protection basis, simplifies the process both for the applicant and the administration.
Vendar pa potem postane bistvenega pomena kakovost postopka in cilj Komisije, da izboljša usposabljanje, ocenjevanje v ciljni državi in s tem povezane informacije in sodne postopke, je zelo dobrodošel: vaša poročevalka se spomni večkrat ponovljenih zahtev Parlamenta, vključno glede pravice do uporabe maternega jezika, ustreznega časovnega okvira, pravne pomoči za pripravo in spremljanje prošenj ter do pritožbe v ciljni državi s suspenzivnim učinkom.
However, the quality of the procedure then becomes crucial and the Commission’s aim to improve training, in-country assessment and the related information and judicial procedures is to be welcomed: your rapporteur recalls Parliament’s repeated demands to include the rights to mother-tongue communication, adequate time, legal assistance to prepare and follow through applications and the right of in-country appeal with suspensive effect.
Postopek za nadzor, kaj se zgodi z osebami, ki so po zavrnitvi prošnje vrnjene v države njihovega izvora, postane bistvenega pomena kot preizkus kakovosti sistema.
A procedure to monitor what happens to those who are returned to their country of origin after having their applications rejected is a crucial test of the system’s quality.
Vaša poročevalka opaža napetost med zahtevami direktive o kvalifikacijskih merilih v okviru enotnega postopka in zahtevami direktive o minimalnih zahtevah, ki ne velja v državah, ki še ne nudijo pomožne pomoči.
Your rapporteur notes the tension between the requirements of the Qualifications Directive concerning a single procedure and those of the Minimum Requirements Directive, which does not apply to countries not already implementing the practice of providing subsidiary protection.
Glede na to, da je direktiva o minimalnih zahtevah, za kakršno se je sporazumel Svet, povzročila precejšnje skrbi na mnogih poljih, bi se bilo treba s Parlamentom ponovno posvetovati po novih postopkih, ki sta jih uvedli pogodbi iz Amsterdama in Nice.
Given that the Minimum Requirements Directive, as currently agreed by Council, has given rise to considerable concerns on a number of grounds, Parliament should be consulted again under the new procedures, in accordance with the Amsterdam and Nice Treaties.
Pravzaprav bi moral Tampere 2 omogočati ocenitev sedanjega paketa direktiv o azilu in s tem povezanih zadevah, z namenom, da se zagotovi njihova medsebojna povezanost in skladnost z instrumenti na področju človekovih pravic.
Indeed, provision should be made in Tampere 2 for the assessment of the current package of directives dealing with asylum and related issues, with a view to ensuring their coherence and compliance with human rights instruments.
Glede na to, da je leta 2003 kakih 70% beguncev ostalo v svojih regijah izvora (le kakih 20% jih je prišlo v EU), se že dolgo zdi smiselno nuditi večjo in boljšo zaščito v teh regijah, vendar mora biti jasno, da je ta dodatna sedanji odgovornosti EU, da nudi zaščito v okviru mednarodnih sporazumov.
Given that in 2003 some 70% of the world’s refugees remained in their region of origin (with only around 20% arriving in the EU), it has long seemed sensible to offer greater protection of better quality in those regions, but to be clear that this is in addition to the EU’s current responsibilities to offer protection under international agreements.
Predlagani dodatni ukrepi, ki nudijo sredstvo obvladanega, zakonitega vstopa v EU, so dobrodošli, zlasti če pripomorejo k zmanjšanju nezakonitega tihotapljenja, čeprav je slednje pogosteje povezano z migracijami kot z iskanjem zatočišča.
The additional measures proposed, which offer the means for managed, legal entry into the EU are to be welcomed, not least if they help to reduce trafficking, although that is often connected to migration rather than a need to seek sanctuary.
Vendar pa narava strahu pred pregonom pomeni, da pot ne more vedno potekati zakonito z zahtevanimi dokumenti.
However, the nature of the fear of persecution means that people do not always flee 'neatly' through regulated channels with the appropriate documents.