natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Južno Afriko na drugi strani zaradi pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council decision concluding the additional protocol to the Agreement on Trade, Development and Cooperation between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of South Africa, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA......................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2005)0372 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0372 )
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta 2005/206/ES, z dne 28. februarja 2005
– having regard to the Council Decision 2005/206/EC of 28 February 2005
32. o podpisu in začasni uporabi zgoraj omenjenega protokola,
32. on the signing and provisional application of the above-mentioned Protocol,
– ob upoštevanju prošnje Sveta za privolitev Parlamenta v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3) v zvezi s členoma 310 in 300(2)(1) Pogodbe ES ( C6‑0350/2005 ),
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 310 and Article 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty ( C6‑0350/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za razvoj ( A6‑0328/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0328/2005 ),
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Južno Afriko na drugi strani zaradi pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji
Proposal for a Council decision concluding the additional protocol to the Agreement on Trade, Development and Cooperation between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of South Africa, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
člena 300(3), drugi pododstavek, in 310 ES
Articles 300(3), second subparagraph, and 310 EC
Poenostavljeni postopek – datum sklepa
Simplified procedure Date of decision
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 974/98 o uvedbi eura
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 on the introduction of the euro
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0357 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0357 )
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katero se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0374/2005 ),
– having been consulted by the Council pursuant to the EC Treaty ( C6‑0374/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6‑0329/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0329/2005 ),
UVODNA IZJAVA 3A (novo)
RECITAL 3 A (new)
(3a) Primerno je sestaviti seznam sodelujočih držav članic, ki ga bo mogoče podaljšati, ko bodo nadaljnje države članice sprejele euro kot nacionalno valuto.
(3a) It is appropriate to provide for a list of participating Member States which may be extended when further Member States adopt the euro as their national currency.
(5)Če država članica meni, da prehodno obdobje ni potrebno, postanejo v tej državi članici eurobankovci in -kovanci zakonito plačilno sredstvo na dan sprejetja eura.
(5) If a Member State considers that a transitional period is not necessary , euro banknotes and coins will become legal tender in that Member State on the date of the adoption of the euro.
Vendar pa je treba takšnim državam članicam omogočiti uporabo enoletnega obdobja „opuščanja“, med katerim bi bilo mogoče nadaljevati s sklicevanjem na enoto nacionalne valute v novih pravnih instrumentih.
However, it should be possible for such Member States to apply a “phasing-out” period of one year, during which it would be possible to continue to make reference to the national currency unit in new legal instruments.
Gospodarski subjekti teh držav članic bi s tem pridobili več časa za pripravo na uvedbo eura in si olajšali prehod.
This would give economic actors in such Member States more time for to prepare for the introduction of the euro and therefore ease the transition.
(5) Prehodno obdobje se lahko skrajša na nič, če država članica meni, da daljše prehodno obdobje ni potrebno.
(5) The transitional period can be reduced to zero, if a Member State considers that a longer transitional period is not necessary .
V tem primeru postanejo v tej državi članici eurobankovci in -kovanci zakonito plačilno sredstvo na dan sprejetja eura.
In that case, euro banknotes and coins will become legal tender in that Member State on the date of the adoption of the euro.
UVODNA IZJAVA 5 A novo
RECITAL 5 A (new)
(5a) Prihodnje udeleženke v euroobmočju bi morale v zgodnjem obdobju pripraviti nacionalni načrt za uvedbo eurobankovcev in - kovancev ter za umik starih nacionalnih bankovcev in kovancev.
(5a) The future entrants to the euro area should prepare, at an early stage, a national plan for the introduction of euro banknotes and coins and for the withdrawal of the old national banknotes and coins .
Izdelati bi morale tudi uravnoteženo in dejavno komunikacijsko strategijo za državljane, podjetja, stranke in dobavitelje.
They should also develop a balanced and active communication strategy directed at citizens, enterprises, clients and suppliers.
Del teh načrtov bi moral biti tudi razmislek o razvijanju strategije za dvojni prikaz cen in zneskov v eurih in enotah nacionalne valute; tak prikaz bi se moral začeti dolgo pred datumom prehoda na eurogotovino in končati po poteku ustreznega obdobja od tega datuma, da bi imeli državljani dovolj časa za prilagajanje novim lestvicam vrednosti.
As part of such plans, they should also consider developing a strategy for the dual display of prices and amounts in euro and the national currency unit, which could begin well in advance of the cash changeover date and end an appropriate time thereafter, so as to give citizens sufficient time to adapt to the new scale of values.
(6) Banke bi se morale zavezati, da bodo v obdobju dvojnega obtoka denarja bankovce in kovance, izražene v enotah nacionalne valute, do določene zgornje meje brezplačno menjale v eurobankovce in -kovance.
(6) Banks should be required to exchange banknotes and coins denominated in the national currency unit for euro banknotes and coins free of charge during the dual circulation period, subject to certain ceilings.
(6) Banke bi se morale zavezati, da bodo po izteku obdobja dvojnega obtoka denarja ne dlje kot tri mesece bankovce in kovance, izražene v enotah nacionalne valute, do določene zgornje meje brezplačno menjale v eurobankovce in -kovance.
(6) Banks should be required to exchange banknotes and coins denominated in the national currency unit for euro banknotes and coins free of charge for no longer than three months after the end of the dual circulation period, subject to certain ceilings.
Člen 1, točka (h) (Uredba (ES) št. 974/98/ES)
Article 1, point (h) (Regulation (EC) No 974/98/EC)
‚prehodno obdobje‘ pomeni obdobje, ki se začne ob 00.00 na dan sprejetja eura in se izteče ob 00.00 na dan prehoda na eurogotovino;
(h) “transitional period” shall mean the period beginning at 00.00 on the euro adoption date and ending at 00.00 on the cash changeover date;
(h) ‚prehodno obdobje‘ pomeni obdobje , ne daljše od enega leta, ki se začne ob 00.00 na dan sprejetja eura in se izteče ob 00.00 na dan prehoda na eurogotovino;
(h) “transitional period” shall mean the period , not exceeding one year, beginning at 00.00 on the euro adoption date and ending at 00.00 on the cash changeover date;
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 8, TOČKA (A)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 8, POINT (A)
Člen 15, odstavka 1 in 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 974/98)
Article 15, paragraphs 1 and 2 (Regulation (EC) No 974/98)
(a) v odstavkih 1 in 2 se besede „po koncu prehodnega obdobja“ nadomestijo z „od ustreznega datuma prehoda na eurogotovino“;
(a) In paragraphs 1 and 2, the words “after the end of the transitional period” are replaced by the words “from the respective cash changeover date”;
(a) v odstavkih 1 in 2 se besede „po koncu prehodnega obdobja“ nadomestijo z „od ustreznega datuma prehoda na eurogotovino“ .
(a) In paragraphs 1 and 2, the words "after the end of the transitional period" are replaced by the words "from the respective cash changeover date ".
Besede "v sodelujočih državah članicah, ki sprejmejo euro po 1. januarju 2002 to obdobje traja največ dva meseca" se dodajo v odstavku 1 med "najkasneje" in"to obdobje" ter na koncu odstavka 2".
The words "in participating Member States adopting the euro after 1 January 2002, that period shall last up to two months" shall be added in paragraph 1 between "at the latest" and "this period" and at the end of paragraph 2."
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 8, TOČKA (B)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 8, POINT (B)
Člen 15, odstavek 3, pododstavek 1 (Uredba (ES) št. 974/98)
Article 15, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1 (Regulation (EC) No 974/98)
Banke sodelujočih držav članic, ki sprejmejo euro po 1. januarju 2002, menjajo nacionalne bankovce in kovance svojih komitentov v obdobju iz odstavka ena za eurobankovce in -kovance brezplačno in brez kakršnih koli omejitev do zgornje meje, ki jo lahko določi nacionalno pravo.
During the period referred to in paragraph 1, banks in participating Member States adopting the euro after 1 January 2002 shall exchange their customers’ national notes and coins for notes and coins in euro, free of charge and without any limitation, up to a ceiling which may be set by national law.
Banke lahko zahtevajo predhodno obvestilo, če menjavi namenjen znesek presega zgornjo mejo, ki jo je določila banka in je v skladu z zneskom, običajnim za gospodinjstvo.
Banks may require that notice be given if the amount to be exchanged exceeds a ceiling set by the bank and corresponding to a household amount.
Banke sodelujočih držav članic, ki sprejmejo euro po 1. januarju 2002, menjajo nacionalne bankovce in kovance svojih komitentov ne dlje kot tri mesece po izteku obdobja dvojnega obtoka denarja za eurobankovce in -kovance brezplačno in brez kakršnih koli omejitev do zgornje meje, ki jo lahko določi nacionalno pravo.
For no longer than three months after the end of the dual circulation period , banks in participating Member States adopting the euro after 1 January 2002 shall exchange their customers’ national notes and coins for notes and coins in euro, free of charge and without any limitation, up to a ceiling which may be set by national law.
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 974/98 o uvedbi eura
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 on the introduction of the euro
o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Andrzeja Pęczaka, nekdanjega poslanca Evropskega parlamenta
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Andrzej Pęczak, former Member of the European Parliament
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................5
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................3
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Andrzeja Pęczaka za zaščito njegove imunitete v zvezi s kazenskimi postopki, ki so bili proti njemu vloženi dne 18. aprila 2005 na okrožnem sodišču v Łódźu na Poljskem, in razglašeni na plenarnem zasedanju 25. maja 2005,
– having regard to the request by Andrzej Pęczak for defence of his immunity in connection with the criminal proceedings brought against him before the District Court in Łódź, Poland, on 18 April 2005, announced in plenary sitting on 25 May 2005,
– ob upoštevanju členov 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 ter člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Articles 8, 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, and Article 6(2) of the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976,
– ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 12. maja 1964 in 10. julija 1986
– having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
– ob upoštevanju člena 6(3) in člena 7 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0330/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0330/2005 ),
A. ker je bil Andrzej Pęczak izvoljen v poljski parlament (Sejm) 23. septembra 2001; ker je po podpisu pristopne pogodbe 16. aprila 2003 postal opazovalec; ker je bil poslanec v Evropskem parlamentu od 1. maja 2004 do 19. julija 2004; ker je njegov mandat v poljskem parlamentu potekel 19. oktobra 2005,
A. whereas Andrzej Pęczak was elected to the Polish Parliament (Sejm) on 23 September 2001; whereas after the signature of the Accession Treaty on 16 April 2003 he became an Observer; whereas he was a Member of the European Parliament from 1 May 2004 until 19 July 2004; whereas his term of office in the Polish Parliament expired on 19 October 2005,
B. ker Andrzej Pęczak trdi, da je urad poljskega javnega tožilca med postopki kršil zakon in da so sklepi okrožnega sodišča o njegovem pridržanju, priporu in kasnejšem podaljšanju pripora politično pogojeni,
B. whereas Andrzej Pęczak complains that the Polish Public Prosecutor's office has violated the law in its proceedings and that the District Court's decisions on his detention and arrest as well as the subsequent extensions of the provisional arrest are politically motivated,
C. ker Andrzej Pęczak trdi, da kazenski postopki, ki so bili vloženi proti njemu, kršijo domnevo nedolžnosti, in da razmere njegovega pridržanja in pripora omejujejo njegove sposobnosti za obrambo,
C. whereas Andrzej Pęczak complains that those criminal proceedings brought against him are in breach of the presumption of innocence and that the conditions of his detention and arrest limit his ability to defend himself,
D. ker Andrzej Pęczak trdi, da je postopek, s katerim mu je Sejm odvzel imuniteto, bil "pravno neveljaven" ter temelji na objavah v javnih občilih, in da njegovi pozivi k posredovanju, ki jih je poslal različnim osebam (kot je varuh človekovih pravic), niso imeli učinka,
D. whereas Andrzej Pęczak complains that the procedure by which the Sejm waived his immunity was "legally invalid" and based on publications in the media, and that his motions for action sent to various persons (such as the Ombudsman) had no effect,
E. ker na osnovi pridobljenih informacij Andrzeja Pęczaka ne ščiti parlamentarna imuniteta v zvezi z nobeno od zahtev, ki so bile predstavljene predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta,
E. whereas, on basis of the information obtained, Andrzej Pęczak is not protected by parliamentary immunity in respect of any of the claims which have been drawn to the attention of the President of the European Parliament,
EXPLANATORY STATEMEN T
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Zahteva za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Andrzeja Pęczaka
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Andrzej Pęczak
Člena 6(3) in 7
Rules 6(3) and 7
o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Giovannija Claudia Fave
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Giovanni Claudio Fava
– ob upoštevanju zahteve, ki jo je Giovanni Claudio Fava vložil za zaščito svoje poslanske imunitete 1. julija 2005 in ki je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 6. julija 2005,
– having regard to the request by Giovanni Claudio Fava for defence of his immunity of 1 July 2005, announced in plenary sitting on 6 July 2005,
– ob upoštevanju zagovora Giovannija Claudia Fave, izvedenega v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
– having heard Giovanni Claudio Fava in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0331/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0331/2005 ),
Zahteva za zaščito poslanske imunitete in privilegijev Giovannija Claudia Fave
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Giovanni Claudio Fava
Zahteva za zaščito imunitete vložil datum zahteve datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Request for defence of immunity from Date of request Date announced in plenary
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statističnih podatkih Skupnosti o strukturi in dejavnostih tujih podružnic
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics on the structure and activity of foreign affiliates
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0088 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0088 )
Še ni objavljeno v UL. ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 285(1) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C6‑0084/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0084/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6–0332/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0332/2005 ),
(11) Ukrepi, potrebni za izvajanje te uredbe, se sprejmejo v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil.
(11) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission.
V resoluciji o izvajanju zakonodaje o finančnih storitvah
In its resolution of 5 February 2002 on the implementation of financial services legislation
115. z dne 5. februarja 2002 je Evropski parlament izrazil željo, da bi Evropski parlament in Svet imela enakovredno vlogo pri nadzoru delovanja Komisije kot izvršnega organa, s čemer bi bilo Evropskemu parlamentu omogočeno izvajanje zakonodajnih pooblastil, opredeljenih v členu 251 Pogodbe.
115. , the European Parliament requested that the European Parliament and the Council have an equal role in supervising the way in which the Commission exercises its executive role in order to reflect the legislative powers of the European Parliament under Article 251 of the Treaty.
V slovesni izjavi, ki jo je istega dne pred Evropskim parlamentom podal predsednik Komisije, je slednji podprl izraženo željo Parlamenta.
In the solemn declaration made before the European Parliament the same day by its President the Commission supported that request.
11. decembra 2002 je Komisija predlagala predloge sprememb Sklepa 1999/468/ES ( KOM(2002)0179 ) in 22. aprila 2004 predstavila spremenjeni predlog ( KOM(2004)0324 ).
On 11 December 2002, the Commission proposed amendments to Decision 1999/468/EC ( COM( 2002)0719) and then submitted an amended proposal on 22 April 2004 ( COM(2004)0324 ).
Evropski parlament meni, da njegova zakonodajna pooblastila v tem predlogu niso zagotovljena.
The European Parliament does not consider that that proposal preserves its legislative prerogatives.
Po mnenju Evropskega parlamenta bi morala Evropski parlament in Svet imeti priložnost, da v določenem roku ocenita prenos izvedbenih pooblastil na Komisijo.
In the view of the European Parliament, the European Parliament and the Council should have the opportunity of evaluating the conferral of implementing powers on the Commission within a determined period.
V tem smislu je primerno, da se omeji obdobje, v katerem Komisija lahko sprejema izvedbene ukrepe.
It is therefore appropriate to limit the period during which the Commission may adopt implementing measures.
(11a) Evropskemu parlamentu je treba dati tri mesece časa od prvega prejema osnutka predlogov sprememb in izvedbenih ukrepov za njihovo preučitev in oblikovanje mnenja.
(11a) The European Parliament should be given a period of three months from the first transmission of draft amendments and implementing measures to allow it to examine them and to give its opinion.
V nujnih in ustrezno utemeljenih primerih mora biti omogočeno skrajšanje tega časa.
However, in urgent and duly justified cases, it should be possible to shorten that period.
Če pa Evropski parlament v tem času sprejme resolucijo, mora Komisija ponovno preučiti osnutek predlogov ali ukrepov.
If, within that period, a resolution is passed by the European Parliament, the Commission should re-examine the draft amendments or measures.
Države članice lahko, ob spoštovanju pogojev glede kakovosti iz člena 6 , zbirajo podatke z uporabo vseh virov, ki se jim zdijo ustrezni.
Member States may , whilst complying with conditions as to quality referred to in Article 6, collect the information required under this Regulation using any sources they consider relevant.
Države članice ob spoštovanju pogojev glede kakovosti iz člena 6 zbirajo podatke z uporabo vseh virov, ki se jim zdijo ustrezni.
Member States shall , whilst complying with conditions as to quality referred to in Article 6, collect the information required under this Regulation using any sources they consider relevant.
Komisija izdela program pilotnih študij, ki ga izvedejo nacionalni organi v smislu člena 2 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 322/97 na prostovoljni podlagi, z namenom ugotavljanja izvedljivosti in stroškov zbiranja podatkov o dodatnih spremenljivkah in razčlenitvah za notranje statistične podatke o tujih podružnicah ter za zbiranje podatkov o zunanjih statističnih podatkih o tujih podružnicah.
The Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies to be carried out by national authorities in the meaning of Article 2 of Council Regulation ( CE ) No 322/97 on a voluntary basis to investigate the feasibility and costs of collecting data on additional variables and breakdowns for inward statistics on foreign affiliates, and of collecting data on outward statistics of foreign affiliates.
Komisija izdela program pilotnih študij, ki ga izvedejo nacionalni organi v smislu člena 2 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 322/97 o dodatnih spremenljivkah in razčlenitvah za notranje statistične podatke o tujih podružnicah ter za zbiranje podatkov o zunanjih statističnih podatkih o tujih podružnicah.
The Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies to be carried out by national authorities in the meaning of Article 2 of Council Regulation ( EC ) No 322/97 on additional variables and breakdowns for inward statistics on foreign affiliates, and of collecting data on outward statistics of foreign affiliates.
Pilotne študije se izvedejo z namenom, da se ocenita ustreznost in izvedljivost zbiranja podatkov, pri čemer se upoštevajo prednosti razpoložljivosti podatkov glede na stroške statističnega sistema in obremenitve za podjetja.
The pilot studies shall be carried out in order to assess the relevance and feasibility of collecting data, taking into account the benefits of the availability of the data in relation to the cost of the statistical system and the burden on enterprises.