natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Boj proti spolni zlorabi otrok in otroški pornografiji ter zlasti preprečevanje tveganja ponovitve kaznivega dejanja v zvezi s tem mora biti prednostna naloga Unije.
Combating the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and in particular combating risks of recidivism in this context, should be a priority for the Union.
Načelo vzajemnega priznavanja se mora med drugim uporabiti za začasno ali trajno prepoved opravljanja poklicnih dejavnosti, povezanih z nadzorom otrok, izrecno določeno s tem okvirnim sklepom, kadar je ta prepoved posledica kazenske obsodbe za enega izmed prekrškov, ki zadevajo spolno zlorabo otrok in otroško pornografijo.
The principle of mutual recognition should be applicable inter alia to temporary or permanent prohibition from exercising professional activities related to the supervision of children, which is expressly provided for by the Framework Decision, where that prohibition is consequent upon a criminal conviction for one of the offences connected to the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography.
Za kakršnokoli okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju kazenskih zadev morajo biti države članice pripravljene sodelovati.
The Member State willingness to co-operate is necessary for any strengthened co-operation in the area of criminal matters.
Ključni element pri nadaljnjem sodelovanju je obstoječa skupna osnova.
Existing common basis is a fundamental element for any further co-operation.
Ni priporočljivo, da bi vzajemno priznavanje omejili le na prepoved izvajanja pristojnosti v zvezi z nadzorom otrok.
Limitation of mutual recognition only to prohibition from exercising responsibilities related to the supervision of children is not advisable.
Takšna omejitev ni bila uvedena z okvirnim sklepom Sveta z dne 22. decembra 2003, ki vzpostavlja le minimalni skupni pristop EU do opredeljenih vrst kaznivih dejanj in hkrati omogoča odločitve o instrumentih, ki niso omenjeni v členu 5(3) tega sklepa (glej tudi člen 5(4) okvirnega sklepa z dne 22. decembra 2003).
Such limitation has not been imposed by Council Framework Decision of 22 December 2003 establishing only a minimum common EU approach to defined types of criminal offences simultaneously allowing decisions concerning instruments other than those mentioned in article 5(3) of this decision (see also Framework Decision article 5(4) of 22 December 2003).
Priporočljivo je, da se obseg priznavanja in uveljavljanja prepovedi razširi z vključitvijo prepovedi izvajanja katere koli poklicne dejavnosti v zvezi z nadzorom otrok v zasebnih ali javnih ustanovah.
It is advisable to extend the scope of recognition and enforcement of prohibitions to include prohibitions from exercising professional activities in any character in public or private institutions related to the supervision of children.
Za več podatkov o prepovedih glej opredelitev "prepovedi" v členu 2 (c).
For more information on prohibitions, see article 2 (c) definition of “prohibition”.
c) "prepoved" začasno ali trajno prepoved opravljanja poklicnih dejavnosti, povezanih z nadzorom otrok, iz člena 5(3) okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2004/68/PNZ z dne 22. decembra 2003 o boju proti spolni zlorabi otrok in otroški pornografiji, ki je posledica obsodbe za kaznivo dejanje iz člena 1(1);
(c) "prohibition" shall mean a temporary or permanent ban on exercising professional activities related to the supervision of children, referred to in Article 5(3) of Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA of 22 December 2003 on combating the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, arising from a conviction for an offence under Article 1(1);
c) "prepoved" začasno ali trajno prepoved opravljanja poklicnih dejavnosti, povezanih z nadzorom otrok, iz člena 5(3) okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2004/68/PNZ z dne 22. decembra 2003 o boju proti spolni zlorabi otrok in otroški pornografiji, ter opravljanja poklicnih dejavnosti, ki niso nadzor otrok, v zasebni ali javni ustanovi, ki nadzoruje otroke ali dela z otroki, ki so posledica obsodbe za kaznivo dejanje iz člena 1(1);
(c) "prohibition" shall mean a temporary or permanent ban on exercising professional activities related to the supervision of children, referred to in Article 5(3) of Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA of 22 December 2003 on combating the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and on exercising activities other than the supervision of children within a public or private institution that supervises or works with childr en , arising from a conviction for an offence under Article (1);
Zelo je pomembno, da se predvidijo tudi prepovedi v zvezi z delovnimi mesti, drugimi dejavnostmi ali poslovnimi dejavnostmi v ustanovah, ki nadzorujejo otroke ali delajo z njimi, da bi preprečili položaj, ko bi na primer oseba, obsojena zaradi pedofilije v določeni državi, lahko imela redne stike z otroki v okviru svojih poklicnih dejavnosti, ki niso nadzor otrok, v takšni ustanovi v drugi državi.
It is very important that also those prohibitions related to jobs, other activities or business activities within institutions which supervise children or work with them should be passed on to eliminate situations where for instance a person convicted for paedophilia in one country could have regular contact with children as part of their professional responsibilities other than supervision of children in such an institution in another country .
(d)"centralni organ" organ, imenovan na podlagi člena 2 Sklepa Sveta z dne […] o izmenjavi podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence;
(d) "central authority" shall mean the authority appointed under Article 2 of the Council Decision of […] on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record;
(d)"centralni organ" organ, imenovan na podlagi člena 1 Sklepa Sveta z dne […] o izmenjavi podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence;
(d) "central authority" shall mean the authority appointed under Article 1 of the Council Decision of […] on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record;
Člen 3, odstavek -1
Article 3, paragraph -1
Kadar veljavni mednarodni instrumenti o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah to dovoljujejo, se prepovedi, ki so jih uvedle tretje države, vpišejo v kazensko evidenco.
Where the applicable international instruments on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters so allow, prohibitions imposed by third countries shall be registered in the criminal record.
Ob upoštevanju resnosti prekrška, v zvezi s katerim je bila izdana prepoved, je priporočljivo, da se državljanom Evropske unije zagotovi višja raven varnosti in da se državam članicam naloži obveznost vpisa v kazensko evidenco tudi prepovedi, izdanih v državah, ki niso države članice, če to dovoljujejo veljavni mednarodni instrumenti, na primer Evropska konvencija o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah iz leta 1959
Considering the seriousness of the offence in relation to which the prohibition has been issued, it is advisable to provide European Union citizens with a higher level of safety by obliging the Member States to register in criminal records also prohibitions issued in countries which are not Member States if it should be permitted by applicable international instruments, such as the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 1959
1 Predlog spremembe bo s težavo sprejet, saj temelji na pravni podlagi, ki presega podlago tega sklepa (člen 3(1)(a) in (c) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji). .
1 There may be difficulties with passing this amendment as it exceeds beyond the scope of the basis for the decision (It is based on article 31(1)(a) and (c) European Union Treaty).
Države članice izvedejo potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovijo vpis vsake prepovedi v kazensko evidenco.
Member States shall take the necessary steps to ensure that any prohibition is registered in the criminal record.
Prepovedi, za katere bo veljal obstoječi okvirni sklep, so omejene in opredeljene v členu 2, točki c.
Prohibitions on which the present frame work decision will apply are limited and laid down in Article 2(c).
V okvirnem sklepu je treba izrecno predvideti tudi obveznost vpisa v kazensko evidenco tistih prepovedi, ki so jih uvedle druge države.
The obligation to register in the criminal record also those prohibitions which have been passed on by other States should be expressly provided for in the Framework Decision.
Kadar centralni organ države izdajateljice drugi državi članici posreduje podatke o kazenski evidenci v skladu z mednarodnimi predpisi, ki se uporabljajo za medsebojno pravno pomoč v kazenskih zadevah, navede prepoved v izpisku iz kazenske evidence.
When the issuing State passes on criminal record information to another Member State under the applicable international rules on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, it shall mention the prohibition in the excerpt from the criminal record.
Kadar centralni organ države izdajateljice drugi državi članici posreduje podatke o kazenski evidenci v skladu z mednarodnimi predpisi, ki se uporabljajo za medsebojno pravno pomoč v kazenskih zadevah, in v skladu s Sklepom Sveta št. 2005/876/JHA z dne 21. novembra 2005 v zvezi z izmenjavo podatkov iz kazenske evidence 1 , navede prepoved poleg ostalih podatkov v izpisku iz kazenske evidence.
When the issuing State passes on criminal record information to another Member State under the applicable international rules on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, and in accordance with Council Decision 2005/876/JHA of 21 November 2005 on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record 1 , it shall mention the prohibition among the information provided for in the excerpt from the criminal record.
1 UL L 322, 9.12.2005, str.
1 OJ L 322, 9.12.2005, p.
Podatkov, ki jih posreduje država članica izdajateljica, ni treba omejiti le na prepovedi, temveč lahko vsebujejo tudi dodatne informacije o kriminalni preteklosti storilca kaznivega dejanja.
The information given by the issuing Member State has not to be necessarily limited on prohibitions but may contain also additional information concerning criminal history of the offender.
Nedavno sprejeti sklep Sveta o izmenjavi podatkov iz kazenske evidence dopolnjuje predpise Konvencije iz leta 1959, s tem da podrobno navaja roke za predložitev podatkov o prepovedi na zahtevo države, ki uveljavlja prepoved.
The recently adopted Council Decision on the exchange of information from criminal record supplements regulations of the Convention of 1959 by providing details on time-limitations related to passing on information about the prohibition on request of the enforcing State.
Kadar je v okviru uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo vložen zahtevek za izpis iz kazenske evidence posamezne države članice za pridobitev informacij o državljanu druge države članice, se vloga vedno naslovi na centralni organ države članice, katere državljanstvo ima zadevna oseba.
Where application is made in the framework of this Framework Decision for the criminal records of a Member State, in accordance with national law, with a view to obtaining information on a national of another Member State, an application shall always be made to the central authority of the Member State of which the person concerned is a national.
Kadar je v okviru uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo vložen zahtevek za izpis iz kazenske evidence posamezne države članice za pridobitev informacij o državljanu druge države članice ali osebi s prebivališčem v tej državi , tudi če pred sodiščem proti tej osebi ne poteka noben kazenski postopek, se vloga vedno naslovi na centralni organ države članice, katere državljanstvo ima zadevna oseba oziroma v kateri ta oseba prebiva .
Where application is made in the framework of this Framework Decision for the criminal records of a Member State, in accordance with national law, with a view to obtaining information on a national of, or on a person residing in, another Member State, including where there are no criminal proceedings before a court against any such persons, an application shall always be made to the central authority of the Member State of which the person concerned is a national or is a resident .
Določba iz člena 5 predloga okvirnega sklepa je pomanjkljiva, ker ne zajema oseb, ki živijo v EU, vendar niso njeni državljani.
The provision of Article 5 of the proposed Framework Decision leaves a lacuna in respect of non-EU nationals who may, nevertheless, be living within the EU.
Ob upoštevanju sprejete prakse izvajanja Evropske konvencije o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah (zlasti v zvezi s pridržki glede člena 13 te konvencije) je treba v tem okvirnem sklepu izrecno navesti, da se kazenska evidenca lahko uporabi tudi, če proti zadevni osebi ni bil pred sodiščem sprožen noben postopek.
Keeping in mind the accepted practice of applying the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (particularly in view of reservations expressed for article 13 of this Convention), it is crucial to state expressly in this framework decision that application for criminal record should also be considered if no criminal proceedings have been brought against the person concerned before any court.
Vendar tudi ta predlog ne sme preseči okvirov sklepa.
However, even such a proposal may not exceed beyond the frames of the decision.
Na primer, podatki iz kazenske evidence se lahko zahtevajo za pridobitev dovoljenja za izvajanje določenih dejavnosti v zvezi z nadzorom otrok.
For instance applying when information from the criminal record is required to obtain a permit to exercise certain activities related to the supervision of children.
Ko se pri uporabi tega okvirnega sklepa v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo vloži zahtevek za izpis podatkov o osebi, ki ima državljanstvo več držav, iz kazenske evidence posamezne države članice, se takšna vloga vedno naslovi na centralni organ vsake države članice, katere državljanstvo ima zadevna oseba.
Where application is made in the framework of this Framework Decision for the criminal records of a Member State, in accordance with national law, with a view to obtaining information on a national of more than one State, such an application shall always be made to the central authority of each Member State of which the person concerned is a national.
Za osebe, ki imajo državljanstvo dveh ali več držav, je treba predvideti natančne določbe.
Persons who are nationals of two or more states should be subject to explicit regulations.
Ta predlog spremembe je posebej pomemben, ker ni znano, kako podatki krožijo med državami, katerih državljanstvo ima zadevna oseba, saj po uredbi iz člena 22 Evropske konvencije iz leta 1959 država, na ozemlju katere je bila zadevna oseba obsojena, ni dolžna obvestiti drugih držav o obsodbi, če je oseba državljan države, v kateri je bila obsojena.
This proposal is particularly important since it is not known how the information circulates between states of which the person concerned is a national, since regulation of Article 22 European Convention of 1959 exempts the State in whose territory the person concerned was convicted from notifying other States about the conviction if the convicted person is a national of the convicting country.
Ta položaj se tudi ni izboljšal z nedavno sprejetim sklepom Sveta o izmenjavi informacij iz kazenske evidence.
This situation is also not improved by the recently adopted Council Decision on the exchange of information from criminal record.
Člen 7, Naslov
Article 7, heading
Razlogi za nepriznavanje ali neizvrševanje
Reasons for non-recognition or non-enforcement
Razlogi za nepriznavanje, neizvrševanje ali priredbo prepovedi
Reasons for non-recognition , non-enforcement or adaptation of the prohibition
Državi članici je dana tudi možnost, da izrečeno prepoved priredi.
A member State has also a possibility to adapt declared prohibition.
Člen 7, točka (c a) (novo)
Article 7, point (c a) (new)
(ca) če za kaznivo dejanje, ki naj bi privedlo do prepovedi, v državi izvršiteljici velja pomilostitev.
(ca) the offence at the origin of the prohibition is covered by an amnesty in the enforcing State.
Upoštevanje pomilostitve, ki jo je odobrila druga država članica.
Bearing in mind respect for amnesty given in another Member State.
(Uporaba načela „ne bis in idem”.)
(Application of the "ne bis in idem" principle).
Če čas trajanja prepovedi preseže najdaljši čas, določen za enako kaznivo dejanje z zakonodajo države izvršiteljice, se čas trajanja izvršene prepovedi zniža na ta najdaljši čas.
If the duration of the prohibition exceeds the maximum provided for by the law of the enforcing State for the same offence, the duration of the enforced prohibition shall be reduced to that maximum.
Zaradi suverenosti držav članic v kazenskih zadevah je treba spoštovati pravila posameznih držav članic o izvrševanju obsodb za kaznivo dejanje.
Considering sovereignty of a Member State in criminal matters it is necessary to respect the rules of execution of offences in different Member States.
Če bo odstavek izglasovan, upoštevajte predhodni odstavek kot odstavek 1.
Should this paragraph be adopted, the previous paragraph should be regarded as paragraph 1.
Pristojni organ države izvršiteljice za izvršitev prepovedi ne zahteva drugih formalnosti razen obrazca B iz člena 4(2) Sklepa Sveta z dne […] o izmenjavi podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence.
To enforce a prohibition, the competent authority of the issuing State shall not require any formalities other than form B , referred to in Article 4(2) of the Council Decision of […] on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record.
Pristojni organ države izvršiteljice za izvršitev prepovedi ne zahteva drugih formalnosti razen obrazca iz člena 3(2) Sklepa Sveta z dne […] o izmenjavi podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence.
To enforce a prohibition, the competent authority of the issuing State shall not require any formalities other than the form referred to in Article 3(2) of the Council Decision of […] on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record.
Takšen primer predvideva že člen 7 (2).
This case is already foreseen in Article 7, second indent.
Vsaka država članica izvede potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi obsojencu zagotovi suspenzivno pravno sredstvo za pritožbo zoper priznavanje in izvrševanje prepovedi v skladu s členom 6.
Each Member State shall put in place the necessary arrangements to ensure that the convicted person has a suspensive legal remedy against the recognition and enforcement of a prohibition pursuant to Article 6.
Pritožba je predložena sodišču v državi izvršiteljici v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo te države.
The action shall be brought before a court in the enforcing State in accordance with the national law of that State.
Vsaka država članica izvede potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi obsojencu zagotovi nesuspenzivno pravno sredstvo za pritožbo zoper priznavanje in izvrševanje prepovedi v skladu s členom 6.
Each Member State shall put in place the necessary arrangements to ensure that the convicted person has a non- suspensive legal remedy against the recognition and enforcement of a prohibition pursuant to Article 6.
Predlog spremembe se nanaša na novo besedilo določbe v osnutku poročila.
The amendment relates to the new wording of this provision in the draft report.
V tisti obrazložitvi je utemeljeno, da so suspenzivna pravna sredstva potrebna za zagotovitev učinkovitosti prepovedi in preprečitev, da bi otroci ostali brez zaščite, če se prepovedi ne priznajo.
That justification argues that suspensive remedies are necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the prohibition and prevent children from remaining unprotected if prohibitions are not recognised.
Učinek takega ukrepa bi bil ravno nasproten od želenega.
In fact, the effects of such a measure would be the opposite to those intended.
Ne odloži se prepoved, temveč njeno priznavanje, kar pomeni, da v državi, v kateri se uporabi pravno sredstvo, ne bi bilo prepovedi, saj priznavanje ne bi imelo učinka.
It is not the prohibition which is suspended but recognition thereof, which means that if it did not take effect, there would be no prohibition in the country ad quem.
Zato se predlaga ohranitev originalnega besedila tega člena, v skladu s katerim bi moral biti zadevni postopek nesuspenizven v zvezi s (samodejnim) priznavanjem prepovedi.
It is therefore proposed that the original wording of this article, according to which the procedure concerned should be non-suspensive in relation to the (automatic) recognition of a prohibition, should be maintained.
o pobudi Kraljevine Belgije za sprejetje okvirnega sklepa Sveta o priznavanju in izvrševanju prepovedi, ki so posledica obsodb za spolne delikte nad otroki, v Evropski uniji
on the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium with a view to the adoption by the Council of a framework decision on the recognition and enforcement in the European Union of prohibitions arising from convictions for sexual offences committed against children
Odbora za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, naj kot odgovorni odbor potrdi osnutek pobude.
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
30-dnevni rok se lahko podaljša, če so podatki, ki jih posreduje država izdajateljica, pomanjkljivi ali če je obrazec B, naveden v členu 4(2) sklepa Sveta ... z dne ... o izmenjavi podatkov iz kazenske evidence, nepopoln.
This deadline of 30 days may be extended if the information provided by the issuing State is insufficient or if form B referred to in Article 4, paragraph 2, of Council Decision of...... on the exchanges of information drawn from police records is incomplete.
30-dnevni rok, ob izteku katerega mora pristojni organ države izvršiteljice podati svojo odločitev, je treba podaljšati, če je treba dobiti dodatne podatke od države izdajateljice ali če je obrazec B nepopoln.
The 30-day deadline at the expiry of which the competent authority of the enforcing State must give its decision must be extended if additional information has to be gathered from the issuing State or if form B is incomplete.
Člen 7, točka c a (novo)
Article 7, point (c a) (new)
(c)(a) če je bila oseba, ki jo prepoved zadeva, rehabilitirana, amnestirana ali pomiloščena v državi izdajateljici.
(ca) where the person subject to the prohibition has undergone rehabilitation, been amnestied or pardoned in the issuing State.
Pristojni organi države izvršiteljice morajo zavrniti priznavanje ali izvrševanje prepovedi, če je bil obsojenec rehabilitiran, amnestiran ali pomiloščen v državi izdajateljici.
The competent authorities of the enforcing State must refuse to recognise or enforce a prohibition if the sentenced person has undergone rehabilitation or been amnestied or pardoned in the issuing State.
Če izrečena prepoved zadeva eno ali več poklicnih dejavnosti, ki niso opredeljene kot take v zakonodaji države izvršiteljice, pristojni organi države izvršiteljice z uporabo člena 6(1) preučijo načine izvrševanja prepovedi.
If the prohibition covers one or more professional activities not designated as such by the legislation of the enforcing State, the competent authorities of the enforcing State for the purpose of Article 6, paragraph 1, shall assess the means of enforcing the prohibition.
Pristojni organi države izvršiteljice preučijo načine izvrševanja prepovedi, ki zadeva poklicne dejavnosti, ki v zakonodaji države izvršiteljice niso opredeljene kot take.
It is a matter for the competent authorities of the enforcing State to assess the means of enforcing a prohibition covering professional activities which are not designated as such by the legislation of the enforcing State.
Pobuda Kraljevine Belgije za sprejetje okvirnega sklepa Sveta o priznavanju in izvrševanju prepovedi, ki so posledica obsodb za spolne delikte nad otroki, v Evropski uniji
Initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium with a view to the adoption by the Council of a framework decision on the recognition and enforcement in the European Union of prohibitions arising from convictions for sexual offences committed against children