natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To pomeni, da se zadevni zaposleni redno srečujejo z veliko negotovostjo glede prihodnosti svoje zaposlitve, saj zamenjava pogodbenega partnerja lahko privede do kolektivnega odpuščanja.
This means that the employees concerned would regularly face serious uncertainty about the future of their jobs because a change of contractual partner could result in collective redundancies.
Čeprav bi zaposlene zaposlil drug izvajalec, bi bili lahko pogoji za zaposlitev slabši.
Even if employees were recruited by another operator, their terms of employment might suffer.
To je podobno razmeram ob zaprtju in prevzemu podjetij.
This is similar to the situation with business closures and takeovers.
Skupno stališče Sveta, ki v skladu z zahtevo Parlamenta iz prve obravnave temelji na večji svobodi izbire za države članice, omenja predpise, ki urejajo prerazporeditev osebja (člen 4(5) in (6)), vendar jih ne določa kot obvezne.
The Council's common position, which, as requested by Parliament at first reading, is based on greater freedom of choice for Member States, does mention the desirability of arrangements governing the transfer of staff (Article 4(5) and (6)), but does not make them compulsory.
Predlogi sprememb, ki zahtevali takšne predpise in pri tem državam članicam prepustili, da v skladu z nacionalno tradicijo odločijo o podrobnostih, na glasovanju Odbora za promet in turizem niso dobili potrebne večine.
Amendments to insert a requirement for such arrangements while leaving it to the Member States to decide the details, in accordance with national traditions, did not secure a majority when put to the vote in the Committee on Transport and Tourism.
Enako se je zgodilo s predlogi sprememb, ki so zagotavljali posebne nacionalne okoliščine in zadevne države članice varovali pred vplivi, ki so zlasti neugodni zanje.
Nor did amendments to provide for particular national circumstances and protect the Member States concerned against effects particularly unfavourable to them.
Odbor je sprejel opredelitev Sveta iz člena 2(c) o območjih, za katera se lahko sklepajo pogodbe; primerno je vsako območje, manjše od države članice.
The Committee accepted the Council's definition in Article 2(c) of areas for which contracts can be concluded: any area smaller than a Member State is eligible.
Poročevalec glede na manjše spremembe skupnega stališča meni, da bo mogoče doseči dogovor s Svetom v drugi obravnavi, tako da se bo po sedmih letih, odkar je Komisija predložila predlog, zakonodajni postopek lahko zaključil.
In view of these relatively small amendments to the common position, your rapporteur anticipates that it will be possible to reach agreement with the Council at second reading, so that, within seven years of the Commission's having submitted this proposal, the legislative procedure can be concluded.
Javne storitve železniškega in cestnega potniškega prevoza
Public service requirements for transport by rail and road
KOM(2002)0107 in KOM(2005)0319
COM(2002)0107 and COM(2005)0319
o zeleni knjigi: Odškodninske tožbe zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES
on the Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules
Bert Doorn , Odbor za pravne zadeve
Bert Doorn , Committee on Legal Affairs
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................13
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs (*) ................................................15
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES ( KOM(2005)0672 ) (zelena knjiga o odškodninskih tožbah),
– having regard to the Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of EC antitrust rules ( COM(2005)0672 ) (Green Paper on Damages),
- ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o politiki konkurence za leto 2004 ( SEC(2005)0805 ),
- having regard to the report from the Commission on competition policy 2004 ( SEC(2005)0805 ),
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. novembra 1961
- having regard to its resolution of 15 November 1961
UL L 61, 15.11.1961, str.
OJ 61, 15.11.1961, p.
1409. , v odgovor na zahtevo Sveta ministrov EGS o potrebi posvetovanja s Parlamentom glede predloga za začetno izvedbeno uredbo, ki zadeva člena 85 in 86 Pogodbe EGS,
1409. , in reply to the EEC Council of Ministers' request for Parliament to be consulted in respect of the proposal for an initial implementing regulation concerning Articles 85 and 86 of the EEC Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi uradi za konkurenco in Komisijo pri obravnavi primerov, ki spadajo na področje uporabe člena 85 ali člena 86 Pogodbe ES
- having regard to the Commission Notice on cooperation between national competition authorities (NCAs) and the Commission in handling cases falling within the scope of Articles 85 or 86 of the EC Treaty
UL C 313, 15.10.1997, str.
OJ C 313, 15.10.1997, p.
- ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Lizboni 23. in 24. marca 2000, Evropskega sveta v Götheburgu 15. in 16. junija 2001, Evropskega sveta v Laeknu 14. in 15. decembra 2001, Evropskega sveta v Barceloni 15. in 16. marca 2002 in Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 20. in 21. marca 2003, 25. in 26. marca 2004, 22. in 23. marca 2005 ter 23. in 24. marca 2006,
- having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000, the Gothenburg European Council of 15 and 16 June 2001, the Laeken European Council of 14 and 15 December 2001, the Barcelona European Council of 15 and 16 March 2002, and the Brussels European Councils of 20 and 21 March 2003, 25 and 26 March 2004, 22 and 23 March 2005, and 23 and 24 March 2006,
- ob upoštevanju poročila, ki ga je objavila skupina na visoki ravni za lizbonsko strategijo novembra 2004 z naslovom 'Sprejeti izziv - lizbonska strategija za rast in zaposlovanje',
- having regard to the report published in November 2004 by the High Level Group on the Lisbon Strategy, entitled 'Facing the challenge - The Lisbon Strategy for growth and employment',
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 z dne 16. decembra 2002 o izvajanju pravil konkurence iz členov 81 in 82 pogodbe
- having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty
UL L 68, 6.3.2004, str.
OJ L 68, 6.3.2004, p.
1. , Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 773/2004 z dne 7. aprila 2004 o vodenju postopkov s strani Komisije v skladu s členoma 81 in 82 Pogodbe ES
1. , Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty
18. ter Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 z dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij
18. , and Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings
- ob upoštevanju mednarodnih instrumentov, ki priznavajo pravico do učinkovite pravne zaščite, zlasti Splošne deklaracije človekovih pravic, Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah in Mednarodnega pakta o gospodarskih, socialnih in kulturnih pravicah, kot tudi njihovih protokolov,
- having regard to the international instruments that recognise the right to effective judicial protection and in particular the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, as well as the protocols thereto,
- ob upoštevanju člena 6 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter njenih protokolov,
- having regard to Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the protocols thereto,
- ob upoštevanju člena 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
- having regard to Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
- ob upoštevanju člena 45 svojega poslovnika,
- having regard to Article 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0133/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0133/2007 ),
A. ker je politika konkurence že od samega začetka sestavni del projekta evropske integracije in je ključnega pomena v procesu izgradnje Evropske unije,
A. whereas competition policy has formed part of the European integration venture from the outset and is key to the process of the construction of the European Union,
B. ker je prosta in neovirana konkurenca nujna za doseganje ciljev lizbonske in göteborške strategije, vitalnosti notranjega trga, podjetniško odličnost, interese potrošnikov in cilje Evropske unije, medtem ko protikonkurenčno obnašanje neugodno vpliva na te cilje,
B. whereas free and undistorted competition is essential to achieving the objectives of the Lisbon-Göteborg strategy, the vitality of the internal market, entrepreneurial excellence, consumer interests and the goals of the European Union, while anti-competitive behaviour is prejudicial to those objectives,
C. ker sta člena 81 in 82 Pogodbe ES določbi javnega reda, ki imata neposredni učinek in bi ju morali pristojni organi sistematično uporabljati; ker ustvarjata pravice med posamezniki, ki jih morajo pravosodni organi učinkovito varovati v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, vključno s sodbo v primeru 26/62
C. whereas Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty are public policy provisions that have direct effects and that should automatically be applied by the competent authorities; whereas they create rights between individuals, which the judicial authorities should safeguard effectively in line with the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, including the judgment in case 26/62
NV Algemene Transport-en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos proti Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration [1963] ECR-1.
NV Algemene Transport-en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration [1963] ECR-1.
(Van Gend & Loos), ki je pomembna predvsem, ker je predhodnica poznejših primerov,
(Van Gend & Loos), which is notable, in particular, for being the precursor to subsequent cases,
D. ker se konkurenčno pravo v državah članicah EU uveljavlja zlasti prek javnega prava in ker so na ravni držav članic prisotne občutne razlike in ovire, ki morebitne tožnike lahko odvrnejo od tega, da bi zahtevali odškodnino,
D. whereas in the Member States, competition law is chiefly enforced through public-law channels and considerable differences and obstacles exist at Member State level which may prevent potential claimants from pursuing actions for compensation,
E. ker člen 85 Pogodbe o ES zahteva, da Komisija zagotovi uveljavitev načel v zvezi s konkurenčnim pravom, določenih v členih 81 in 82 pogodbe; ker pogodba dopušča druge pravne podlage, ki lahko prispevajo k učinkovitosti teh načel, kot na primer v členih 65, 83, 95, 153 in 308; in ker Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti meni, da mora domači pravni sistem držav članic zaradi pomanjkanja pravil Skupnosti, ki urejajo pravico žrtev do odškodninskega zahtevka pred nacionalnimi sodišči, imenovati pristojna sodišča in določiti natančna postopkovna pravila za varstvo pravic, ki za posameznike izhajajo neposredno iz prava Skupnosti, če takšna pravila niso manj ugodna kot tista, ki urejajo podobne nacionalne postopke (v skladu z načelom enakovrednosti) in če ne dejansko onemogočajo ali prekomerno otežujejo izvajanja pravic, ki izhajajo iz prava Skupnosti (v skladu z načelom učinkovitosti),
E. whereas Article 85 of the EC Treaty requires the Commission to ensure application of the principles laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty concerning competition law; whereas the Treaty provides for other legal bases that can contribute to the effectiveness of those principles, such as Articles 65, 83, 95, 153 and 308; and whereas as the Court of Justice considers that, in the absence of Community rules governing the right of victims to claim damages before the national courts, it is for the domestic legal system of each Member State to designate the courts and tribunals having jurisdiction and to lay down detailed procedural rules governing actions for safeguarding rights which individuals derive directly from Community law, provided that such rules are not less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (in accordance with the principle of equivalence), and provided that they do not render practically impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by Community law (in accordance with the principle of effectiveness),
F. ker redka in izjemna raba zasebnih tožb pred sodno oblastjo držav članic kot določa Uredba (ES) št. 1/2003 v zvezi s posodobitvijo konkurenčne politike pri izvajanju konkurenčnega prava kaže, da so potrebni ukrepi za olajšanje vložitve odškodninske tožbe; ker bi morali takšni ukrepi povečati skladnost s konkurenčnim pravom ES upoštevajoč različne poslovnike in dokaze v državah članicah; ker to ne bi smelo voditi v situacijo, kjer bi bila podjetja, ki se poslužujejo zakonitega gospodarskega ravnanja, izpostavljena pretiranim tveganjem zaradi plačevanja neupravičenih zahtevkov ali prisiljena v spremembo svojega ravnanja, da bi se izognila dragim postopkom,
F. whereas the rare and exceptional use of private actions before the jurisdictions of Member State courts, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 regarding the modernisation of Competition policy in the application of competition law indicates that there is a need for measures to facilitate the bringing of actions for damages; whereas such measures should increase compliance with EC competition law, bearing in mind the different rules of procedure and evidence in the Member States; whereas this should not lead to a situation in which undertakings engaging in lawful economic behaviour are placed at undue risk of having to pay unjustified claims, or to change their behaviour, in order to avoid costly litigation,
G. ker bi morali imeti potrošniki in podjetja, ki so zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil utrpeli škodo, pravico do odškodnine,
G. whereas consumers and businesses that have suffered damage as a result of breach of antitrust rules should have a right to compensation,
H. ker razvoj pravil na področju civilnega sodstva EU, zlasti kar zadeva dostop do sodnega varstva, ni šel v korak z nedavnim razvojem na področju konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti na notranjem trgu,
H. whereas developments in EU civil justice rules, in particular as regards access to justice, have not kept pace with recent developments in Community competition law in the internal market,
I. ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi C-453/99
I. whereas in Case C-453/99
Courage Ltd proti Créhan [2001] ECR I-6297. razsodilo, da posamezniki in podjetja, z namenom zagotoviti popolno učinkovitost člena 81 Pogodbe o ES, lahko zahtevajo nadomestilo za škodo, ki je nastala na podlagi sporazuma ali vedenja, ki omejuje ali izkrivlja konkurenco,
Courage Ltd v Crehan [2001] ECR I-6297. , the Court of Justice ruled that, in order to ensure that Article 81 of the EC Treaty is fully effective, individuals and companies may claim compensation for damage caused to them by virtue of a contract or conduct that restricts or distorts competition,
J. ker obstoječi odškodninski mehanizmi za primere kršitev protimonopolnih pravil na evropski ravni ne zagotavljajo popolne učinkovitosti člena 81 Pogodbe o ES, zlasti v zvezi z žrtvami,
J. whereas the existing redress mechanisms for breach of antitrust rules at European level do not guarantee the full effectiveness of Article 81 of the EC Treaty, in particular with regard to victims,
K. ker veliko držav članic preučuje načine za boljše varstvo potrošnikov s tem, da omogoča skupinske tožbe, in ker bi različne tožbe lahko vodile do izkrivljanja konkurence na notranjem trgu,
K. whereas many Member States are examining ways better to protect consumers by allowing collective actions, and whereas differing courses of action may lead to the distortion of competition in the internal market,
L. ker mora biti vsak predlog Komisije, na področjih, ki niso v njeni izključni pristojnosti na podlagi Pogodbe o ES, v skladu z načeloma subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti,
L. whereas any proposal by the Commission in areas for which the Commission does not have exclusive competence must, pursuant to the EC Treaty, comply with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
3. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Sodišče priznalo pravico žrtvam, ki so utrpele škode zaradi protikonkurenčnega obnašanja, da vložijo samostojne ali nadaljevalne tožbe za nadomestilo; zato pozdravlja zeleno knjigo o odškodninskih tožbah in z njo povezanimi pripravami;
Welcomes the fact that the Court of Justice has recognised the right of victims who have suffered losses as a result of anti-competitive behaviour to bring "stand alone" or "follow on" legal actions to obtain compensation; welcomes, therefore, the Green Paper on Damages as well as the preparatory works linked thereto;
5. zato meni, da mora pravni sistem držav članic omogočati učinkovite postopke civilnega prava, pri čemer se lahko zahteva nadomestilo za škodo, nastalo zaradi kršitev protimonopolnega prava;
Considers, therefore, that the legal systems of the Member States should provide for effective civil law procedures whereby compensation can be claimed for damage resulting from breaches of antitrust law;
8. poudarja, da je pri usposabljanju pravosodnih organov na področju konkurenčnega prava treba zagotoviti kakovost njihovih sodb in da je v postopke primerno vključiti specializirane ali visoko usposobljene organe;
Emphasises that it is vital for the training of judicial authorities in competition law in order to ensure the quality of their rulings, and the essential importance of having proceedings handled by specialist or highly qualified bodies;
11. poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo dejstvo, da kršitev, ki jo je ugotovil nacionalni organ za konkurenco, in je dokončna ter je bila, kjer je to ustrezno, potrjena po pritožbi, samodejno predstavlja očiten dokaz krivde v civilnih postopkih, ki zadevajo ista vprašanja, če je tožena stranka imela ustrezno možnost obrambe v upravnih postopkih;
Urges Member States to accept that the finding of an infringement arrived at by an NCA, once final and, where appropriate, confirmed on appeal, automatically constitutes prima facie proof of fault in civil proceedings involving the same issues, provided that the defendant had an adequate opportunity to defend itself in the administrative proceedings;
21. predlaga, naj se v programih javne pomoči, ki so zakonito sprejeti, da se omogoči lažje sprožanje zasebnih odškodninskih tožb zaradi protikonkurenčnega ravnanja, določijo jasni pogoji za nadzor postopkov in povračilo takšne pomoči, še posebej v primeru poravnave, kjer mora kršitelj plačati stroške;
Recommends that in the public aid programmes that can legitimately be adopted to enable private actions to be brought more easily for damages arising from anti-competitive behaviour, clear-cut conditions be laid down as regards the oversight of the proceedings and the reimbursement of such aid, in particular in cases where the case is settled and the infringer is ordered to pay costs;
28. poziva Komisijo, naj tesno sodeluje s pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi držav članic, da bi ublažila kakršne koli čezmejne ovire, ki državljanom in podjetjem EU preprečujejo, da bi vlagali čezmejne zahtevke za nadomestilo škode v primerih kršitev protimonopolnih pravil Skupnosti v državah članicah; meni, da mora Komisija, če je potrebno, sprožiti sodni postopek za odpravo teh ovir;
Calls on the Commission to work closely with the competent national authorities of the Member States in order to mitigate any cross-border obstacles that prevent EU citizens and businesses from filing cross-border damages claims in cases of breaches of Community antitrust rules in Member States; considers that, if necessary, the Commission should take legal action to remove such obstacles;
Konkurenca v Skupnosti: 50 let izkušenj
Competition in the Community: 50 years of experience
Politika konkurence je neločljiv del Evropske unije.
Competition policy is an inherent part of the EU.
Vse od Rimske pogodbe je igrala pomembno vlogo pri omogočanju obstoja odprtega in dinamičnega trga, ki omogoča podjetniško odličnost in koristi končnemu uporabniku.
Ever since the Treaty of Rome, it has played a crucial part in enabling the existence of an open and dynamic market that generates entrepreneurial excellence and benefits for the end consumer.
Konkurenca je pridobila na pomenu in specifični vrednosti.
Competition has increased in importance and specific value.
Je sestavni del evropske gospodarske logike, in konkurenčni ukrepi so bistveni instrument za izvajanje nalog, ki so zaupane Skupnosti.
It is as an integral part of European economic logic, and competition measures are an essential means of carrying out the tasks entrusted to the Community.
Politika konkurence je bistvena za nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga, za zagotavljanje, da gospodarske dejavnosti proizvedejo optimalne rezultate in za izpolnjevanje lizbonske strategije za rast in trajno zaposlovanje.
Competition policy is essential to the smooth operation of the internal market, ensuring that economic activity produces optimum results and delivering on the Lisbon Strategy for growth and lasting employment.
Ima velik pomen pri reševanju izzivov globalizacije in pri doseganju ciljev Evropske unije.
It is vital to tackling the challenges of globalisation and meeting the European Union's objectives.
Stroški kršitve
The costs of infringement
Kršitve povzročajo mikroekonomske in makroekonomske stroške.
Infringements generate micro-economic and macro-economic costs.
Kršitelji iščejo neuravnotežene odnose z drugimi udeleženci na trgu (konkurenti, dobavitelji, stranke in potrošniki) in si želijo zagotoviti korist na njihove stroške.
Infringers seek to unbalance relations with other market players (competitors, providers, customers and consumers) and secure an advantage at their expense.
Ker se obnašajo na nedovoljen način, povzročajo ogromne gospodarske stroške.
By acting in a proscribed manner they occasion exorbitant economic costs to them.
V širšem smislu ovirajo doseganje rezultatov konkurence: boljša porazdelitev virov, večja gospodarska učinkovitost, večja inovativnost in nižje cene.
In a wider perspective, they prevent the results of competition from being achieved: better allocation of resources, greater economic efficiency, increased innovation and lower prices.
Učinkovita politika konkurence se mora izogibati gospodarskih stroškov in izgube zaupanja, ki nastanejo s kršitvami.
An effective competition policy must avoid the economic costs and loss of confidence generated by infringements.
Pasivni pristop je sokrivda.
Passivity is complicity.
Za učinkovito konkurenčnost je bistveno to, da kršitelj na trgu nima prednosti in da trpi resne posledice zaradi svojega obnašanja, ter navsezadnje prevzame vso odgovornost.
It is crucial to efficient competition that the infringer does not secure advantages on the market and that he suffers serious consequences for his conduct and, in the final analysis, is made fully liable.
Zasebni steber konkurence Skupnosti
The private pillar of Community competition
Pravila konkurence povzročajo specifične administrativne odnose v povezavi s pravnim redom trga, ter urejajo zasebne odnose.
Competition rules generate specific administrative relations as regards market discipline, and regulate private relations.
Zasebna dimenzija členov 81 in 82 pogodbe je prisotna v členu 81(2), ki predvideva, da mora biti vsako prepovedano obnašanje avtomatično nično.
The private dimension of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty can be seen in Article 81(2), which states that any prohibited action shall automatically be void.