natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
K. ker je Evropski parlament sprejel svoje stališče 4. julija 2002; ker je to stališče temeljilo na prvotnem predlogu Komisije iz leta 2001 in je besedilo, o katerem sedaj razpravlja Svet, plod dolgotrajnih pogajanj, kar pomeni, da se je bistveno spremenilo; ker zaradi tega meni, da mora Parlament v okviru postopku posvetovanja ponovno obravnavati besedilo, o katerem sedaj razpravlja Svet,
K. whereas the European Parliament adopted its position on 4 July 2002, whereas that position was, however, based on the Commission’s initial 2001 proposal and whereas the text currently being discussed by the Council is the outcome of laborious negotiation and has consequently been substantially changed; considering, therefore, that Parliament should be consulted again on the basis of the text currently being discussed by the Council,
L. ker bo sprejetje tega okvirnega sklepa imelo za posledico razveljavitev skupnega ukrepa 96/443/PNZ in je posledično treba zagotoviti, da njegova vsebina presega vsebino skupnega ukrepa,
L. whereas the adoption of the framework decision will result in the repeal of Joint Action 96/443/JHA, and whereas the framework decision should not be any less substantial than the Joint Action,
a) treba je dati odločen politični signal za Evropo državljanov, zagotoviti visoko stopnjo zaščite temeljnih pravic in preprečiti, da bi predlog okvirnega sklepa še tretjič doživel neuspeh,
(a) send out a strong political message in support of a Citizens’ Europe and provide a high level of protection for fundamental rights through the avoidance of a third failure in respect of the proposal for a framework decision,
b) treba je zagotoviti, da bo boj proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji temeljil v prvi vrsti na izobraževanju za mir, nenasilju in spoštovanju temeljnih pravic ter na medverskem in večkulturnem dialogu na ravni EU,
(b) make education towards peace, non-violence and respect for fundamental rights, and an interfaith and intercultural dialogue at EU level the main instruments of the fight against racism and xenophobia,
c) zagotoviti je treba, da okvirni sklep v primerjavi s skupnim ukrepom iz leta 1996 ponudi dodano evropsko vrednost in se ne omeji na spajanje različnih nacionalnih stališč,
(c) ensure that the framework decision contributes European added value over and above the 1996 Joint Action and does not merely combine the various Member-State positions,
d) treba je, da Komisija in Svet dejavnejše uporabljata veljavno protidiskriminacijsko in protirasistično zakonodajo ter določbe Pogodbe, natančno spremljata prenos in izvajanje okvirnega sklepa v vsaki državi članici ter o ugotovitvah poročata Evropskemu parlamentu; Komisija mora začeti postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev proti tistim državam članicam, ki ne izvajajo zakonodaje,
(d) together with the Commission, apply more actively existing anti-discrimination and anti-racist legislation and Treaty provisions, and monitor closely the future transposition and implementation of the framework decision in each Member State, and report back to the European Parliament; ensure that the Commission starts infringement proceedings against those Member States which fail to implement the legislation,
e) treba je priznati, da so nekatere države članice kot kaznivo dejanje razglasile zanikanje ali očitno banaliziranje zločinov, zločinov proti človeštvu ali vojnih zločinom,
(e) recognise that some Member States have criminalised the denial or flagrant trivialisation of genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes,
f) treba je, da končno besedilo okvirnega sklepa vsebuje opredelitev kaznivega ravnanja rasističnega in ksenofobičnega značaja, ki je že predvidena v predlogu Komisije glede okvirnega sklepa o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji
(f) insert in the final text of the framework decision the definition of racist and xenophobic offences which is already included in the Commission proposal for a framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia,
KOM(2001)0664 . , in bi omogočila, da se „usmerjanje in podpiranje dejavnosti rasističnih ali ksenofobičnih skupin ter sodelovanje v teh dejavnostih z namenom prispevanja k organizaciji kriminalnih dejavnosti“ obravnava kot kaznivo dejanje,
COM(2001)0664 . pursuant to which “directing, supporting or participating in the activities of a racist or xenophobic group with the intention of contributing to the organisation's criminal activities” is punishable as a criminal offence,
g) treba je natančneje in jasneje opredeliti odstopanja in možnosti za to, da se določeno obnašanje izključi iz kazenske odgovornosti, zlasti kar zadeva obnašanje, naperjeno proti določeni skupini ljudi ali njenim članom, ki se opredeljujejo glede na svojo vero,
(g) define more closely and more clearly derogations and the options for excluding certain types of behaviour from criminal responsibility (with particular reference to behaviour towards a group of people or a member of such a group defined by reference to its religion),
h) iz odstopanj je treba izključiti pojem kršenja javnega reda in miru, ker ne temelji na natančni definiciji tega pojma,
(h) exclude from the derogations the notion of a public order offence, since it is not based on a precise definition of that concept,
i) treba je ohraniti možna odstopanja od načela dvojne kaznivosti, da se tako omogoči medsebojna pravna pomoč med državami članicami za pregon rasističnih in ksenofobičnih oblik obnašanja lahko in je državam članicam kot osrednji del kompromisa omogočeno, da se spopadejo s čezmejnimi rasističnimi gibanji,
(i) leave intact the possibility of derogating from the principle of dual criminal liability in order to enable the Member States to provide mutual support in judicial matters for the purpose of prosecuting those who behave in a racist and xenophobic fashion and in order to enable cross-border racist movements to be combated as an essential part of the compromise achieved,
j) treba je vključiti klavzulo o prepovedi poslabšanja položaja, kot jo vsebuje člen 6 direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost
(j) incorporate a non-regression clause such as the one contained in Article 6 of Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin
22. , to pa zato, da bi izvajanje okvirnega sklepa ne imelo za posledico znižanje ravni obstoječe zaščite,
22. , in order to ensure that the implementation of the framework decision does not lead to a weakening of existing forms of protection,
k) treba je predvideti, da izvajanje okvirnega sklepa ne bo negativno vplivalo na nobeno izmed obvez, ki jih nalaga zgoraj navedena Mednarodna konvencija o odpravi vseh oblik rasne diskriminacije,
(k) ensure that implementation of the framework decision will not undermine any obligation imposed pursuant to the abovementioned 21 December 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,
l) pri Agenciji Evropske unije za temeljne pravice je treba ustanoviti opazovalno skupino, ki bo v državah članicah spremljala podobne oblike kaznivega ravnanja, njena naloga pa bo evidentiranje, hramba in razvrstitev podatkov,
(l) set up, under the aegis of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, a unit for the purpose of monitoring similar offences in the Member States, its task being to record, store and classify data,
m) treba je poskrbeti za dobro izvajanje okvirnega sklepa, da bo v poročilo Komisije lahko vključeno mnenje Agencije za temeljne pravice in ustreznih nevladnih organizacij, kot to določa model, ki ga prinaša direktiva 2000/43/ES,
(m) ensure that the framework decision is satisfactorily implemented by allowing the Commission report to take account of the opinions of the Fundamental Rights Agency and the non-governmental organisations concerned, in accordance with the model established in Directive 2000/43/EC,
n) treba je oblikovati celovit zakonodajni okvir za preprečevanje vseh oblik diskriminacije, za kar je potrebno hitro sprejetje izčrpne direktive o boju proti diskriminaciji (v skladu s členom 13 pogodbe), s katero bi morale biti za vse oblike diskriminacije predvidene učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne kazenske, upravne in rehabilitacijske sankcije (denimo obvezno izobraževanje in javna služba) ali denarne kazni, ki bi v primeru javnih osebnosti in predstavnikov oblasti morale biti strožje, saj bi bilo treba njihov položaj obravnavati kot oteževalno okoliščino,
(n) introduce a comprehensive legal framework enabling discrimination to be combated in all its forms, through the swift adoption of a comprehensive directive on the fight against discrimination (pursuant to Article 13 of the Treaty) which should provide for effective, proportionate and deterrent penal sanctions for all forms of discrimination, as well as administrative sanctions, rehabilitative sanctions such as mandatory education and community service, or fines, which, in the case of public figures and representatives of the authorities, should be more severe owing to the fact that their status should be considered to be an aggravating circumstance,
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA ( B6‑0076/2007 )
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION ( B6‑0076/2007 )
ki ga v skladu s členom 114(1) Poslovnika predlaga
tabled pursuant to Rule 114(1) of the Rules of Procedure
o napredku pri pogajanjih glede okvirnega sklepa o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji
on progress in the negotiations concerning the framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia
– ob upoštevanju svojega poročila z dne 4. julija 2002
– having regard to its report of 4 July 2002
– ob upoštevanju predloga okvirnega sklepa Sveta o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji, ki ga je predstavila Komisija ( KOM(2001)0664 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal for a Council framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia COM(2001)664
UL C 75 E, 26.3.2002, str.
OJ C75 E, 26.3.2002, p.269. ,
A. ker so letna poročila Evropskega centra za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije (EUMC), njegova primerjalna poročila o rasističnih zločinih in dve nedavni poročili o antisemitizmu in islamofobiji pokazala, da so rasistični zločini trdovratna in stalna težava v vseh državah članicah, in ker se ocenjuje, da je bilo v letu 2004 več kot 9 milijonov ljudi žrtev rasističnih zločinov,
A. whereas the annual reports of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), its comparative reports on racist crime and the two recent reports on anti-Semitism and Islamophobia have shown that racist crimes are a persistent and constant problem in all the Member States and that an estimated 9 million people were victims of racist crime in 2004,
B. ker kljub dejstvu, da imajo vse države članice zakonodajo na področju boja proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji, obstajajo med njimi pomembne razlike, in ker ta razhajanja poudarjajo potrebo po usklajevanju na evropski ravni, da se tako zagotovijo učinkoviti ukrepi za boj proti čezmejnemu rasizmu in ksenofobiji po vsej Evropi,
B. whereas although all the Member States have laws to combat racism and xenophobia there are substantial differences between them; whereas these disparities highlight the need for European harmonisation in order to ensure effective action to combat racism and xenophobia across borders and in Europe as a whole;
C. ker kljub večletnim pogajanjem v Svetu še ni prišlo do sporazuma glede predloga okvirnega sklepa,
C. whereas despite several years of negotiation in the Council no agreement has yet been reached on the proposal for a framework decision,
D. ker je nemško predsedstvo izrazilo namero o ponovnem pogajanju o okvirnem sklepu, ki zadeva boj proti rasizmu, in ker je njegovo sprejetje ena izmed prednostnih nalog predsedstva,
D. whereas the German Presidency has signalled its intention to resume negotiations on the framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia and the adoption of the proposal is one of its priorities;
E. ker je besedilo, o katerem se trenutno razpravlja, plod večletnih pogajanj in mora predstavljati izhodiščno točko za oblikovanje okrepljene evropske zakonodaje na tem področju,
E. whereas the text currently under discussion is the outcome of several years of negotiation and should be the starting-point for more substantial European legislation in this area,
F. ker je Evropski parlament sprejel svoje mnenje 4. julija 2002, in ker je to mnenje temeljilo na prvotnem predlogu Komisije iz leta 2001, je primerno, da se Parlament ponovno prosi za mnenje na podlagi besedila o katerem se trenutno razpravlja v Svetu,
F. whereas the European Parliament delivered its opinion on 4 July 2002, but it was based on the Commission’s initial proposal of 2001 and hence Parliament should be reconsulted on the basis of the current text under discussion in the Council,
G. opozarja, da bo sprejetje tega okvirnega sklepa imelo za posledice razveljavitev skupnega ukrepa 96/443/PNZ in da je posledično treba zagotoviti, da njegova vsebina presega vsebino skupnega ukrepa,
G. pointing out that the adoption of the framework decision will result in the annulment of Joint Action 96/443/JHA and the decision should therefore not offer a lower degree of protection than the Joint Action,
a) dati močno politično sporočilo v prid Evrope državljanov in zagotoviti visoko stopnjo zaščite temeljnih pravic s sprejetjem tega okvirnega sklepa,
a) send out a strong political signal in favour of a citizens’ Europe and ensure a high level of protection for fundamental rights by adopting the framework decision,
b) zagotoviti, da ta okvirni sklep doprinese evropsko dodano vrednost v odnosu do skupnega ukrepa iz leta 1996,
b) ensure that the framework decision constitutes European added value compared with the Joint Action of 1996,
c) jasneje opredeliti odstopanja in možnost za izključitev nekaterih oblik obnašanja iz kazenske odgovornosti,
c) define more clearly the derogations and the possibilities for excluding certain forms of behaviour,
d) obdržati možna odstopanja od načela dvojne kaznivosti, da se tako omogoči medsebojno pravno pomoč med državami članicami za pregon rasističnih in ksenofobih oblik obnašanja,
d) maintain the possibility of derogation from the principle of double incrimination in order to facilitate mutual judicial assistance between the Member States in the prosecution of racist and xenophobic behaviour,
e) vključiti klavzulo o prepovedi poslabšanja položaja, da tako izvajaje okvirnega sklepa ne bo vodilo k znižanju ravni obstoječe zaščite,
e) incorporate a non-regression clause so as to try to ensure that the implementation of the framework decision does not lead to a weakening of existing forms of protection,
f) oblikovati popoln zakonodajni okvir za spodbujanje boja proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji, da se tako omogoči hitro sprejetje horizontalne direktive o boju proti diskriminaciji v skladu s členom 3 pogodbe o ES, in predvideti učinkovite, sorazmerne in svarilne kazenske sankcije;
f) set up a complete legal framework to promote the fight against racism and xenophobia, by allowing the rapid adoption of a horizontal directive on combating discrimination pursuant to Article 13 of the EC Treaty and establishing effective penal sanctions that are proportionate and dissuasive;
Predlog priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o napredku pri pogajanjih glede okvirnega sklepa o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji
Proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council concerning the progress of the negotiations on the framework decision on action to combat racism and xenophobia
Obravnavani predlog(-i) priporočila
Original proposal for a recommendation
Datum odločitve za pripravo poročila
Date of decision to draw up a report
o predlogu priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o razvoju strateškega koncepta za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on developing a strategic concept on tackling organised crime
PE 378.797v01-00
PE 378.797v02-00
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.....................................................3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL 3
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA B6 0073/2006................................................................................9
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION B6-0073/2006.....................................................9
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL
o razvoju strateškega koncepta za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu
on developing a strategic concept on tackling organised crime
– o b upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga je predstavil Bill Newton Dunn v imenu skupine ALDE, o razvoju strateškega koncepta za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu ( B6-0073/2006 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Bill Newton Dunn on behalf of the ALDE Group on developing a strategic concept on tackling organised crime ( B6‑0073/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o razvoju strateškega koncepta za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu" ( KOM(2005)0232 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on ‘Developing a strategic concept on tackling organised crime’ ( COM(2005)0232 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 114(3) in 90 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 114(3) and Rule 90 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0152/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0152/2007 ),
A ker je bil od prvih začetkov pred 30 leti dosežen napredek pri policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju na področju boja proti organiziranemu kriminalu,
A. whereas progress has been achieved in police and judicial cooperation on tackling organised crime since the first steps were taken 30 years ago,
B. ker je bil dosežen pomemben napredek pri sodelovanju med organi pregona in pravosodnimi organi (kot je prikazano v letnih poročilih 2005 držav članic, Europola, Eurojusta in delovne skupine za carinsko sodelovanje) in ker je tako sodelovanje temelj vsake uspešne politike boja proti organiziranemu kriminalu na evropski ravni,
B. whereas significant progress has been achieved in cooperation between law enforcement agencies and judicial bodies (as set out in the 2005 annual reports of the Member States, Europol, Eurojust and the Customs Cooperation Working Group (CCWG)), and whereas such cooperation is the cornerstone of any effective, EU-wide policy on tackling organised crime,
C. pozdravlja dejstvo, da so prizadevanja, ki so privedla do večji izmenjave informacij in pospeševanja pobud za usposabljanje za storitve, ki jih je treba opravljati skupaj, obrodila sadove prek premagovanja medsebojnega nezaupanja, ki je vedno glavna ovira vsakega sodelovanja na tem področju,
C. welcoming the fact that these efforts, having led to an increase in information exchange and an intensification of training initiatives for services that are required to work together, have borne fruit by helping to overcome the lack of mutual trust, which is always the principal obstacle to any cooperation in this field,
D. ker morajo vse institucije in agencije EU, ki sodelujejo v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu, v celoti spoštovati državljanske svoboščine ter temeljne človekove pravice državljanov EU in tretjih držav, vključno z najvišjimi standardi varstva podatkov,
D. whereas all EU institutions and agencies involved in the fight against organised crime should fully respect the civil liberties and fundamental human rights of EU and third-country nationals, including the highest standards of data protection,
E. ker danes ni več mogoče dosegati nadaljnjega napredka v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu brez korenite spremembe perspektive, ki bi omogočila reševanje vedno bolj zapletenih notranjih omejitev, hkrati pa soočanje z vedno večjim izzivom eksponentno naraščajočih zunanjih omejitev,
E. whereas, however, the fight against organised crime today will not continue to make progress without a radical change of perspective enabling increasingly complex internal constraints to be resolved at the same time as meeting the growing challenge of exponentially increasing external constraints,
G. ker organizirane kriminalne skupine postajajo vedno bolj kompleksne in strukturirane poslovne organizacije, ki lahko prodrejo na gospodarske in finančne trge ter jih izkrivljajo za ustvarjanje zakonitega gospodarskega okolja, v katerega usmerjajo nezakonito pridobljene dohodke, pogosto s prefinjenimi dejavnostmi pranja denarja,
G. whereas organised criminal groups are becoming increasingly complex and structured business organisations capable of penetrating economic and financial markets and of distorting them in their pursuit of legal economic environments into which to channel illegally acquired income, often by means of sophisticated money-laundering operations,
H. ker je ustanovitev in/ali prevzem, pogosto prek uporabe „navideznih družb“, podjetij v sektorjih, v katerih krožijo ogromne denarne vsote, eden od glavnih instrumentov, ki jih uporabljajo organizirane kriminalne skupine,
H. whereas the establishment and/or acquisition, often through the use of 'shell company' arrangements, of companies in sectors in which enormous sums of money circulate is one of the main instruments used by organised criminal groups,
I. ker je pregon sam po sebi neustrezno sredstvo za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu in ga mora spremljati natančna analiza razširjenosti tega pojava in sposobnosti mafiji podobnih organizacij, da se uveljavijo, zlasti na področjih s šibkimi družbenimi strukturami,
I. whereas enforcement is, of itself, an inadequate means of combating organised crime and needs to be accompanied by a careful analysis of the spread of the phenomenon and the ability of mafia-style organisations to gain a foothold, particularly in areas where social structures are weak,
J. ker mora biti boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu podprt s temeljito preiskavo zmogljivosti akumulacije kapitala in medsebojnega razmerja med zakonitimi in nezakonitimi gospodarskimi dejavnostmi na svetovni ravni, sprejeti pa je treba tudi ukrepe za preprečevanje vstopa organiziranega kriminala v javne uprave ter vzpostavitve povezave z institucijami, množičnimi organizacijami in političnimi osebnostmi,
J. whereas action to combat organised crime should be supported by thorough investigations into capital accumulation capacity and interrelationships between legal and illegal economic activities at global level, with steps being taken to prevent organised crime from infiltrating public administrations and forging links with institutions, mass organisations and political figures,
K. ker organiziran kriminal pri svojem delovanju uporablja nezakonite dejavnosti, da doseže tiho sprejemanje ter vzpostavi kontrolo nad določenim ozemljem,
K. whereas organised crime operates by securing tacit acceptance and establishing control over a given territory by means of illegal activities,
L. ker lahko organiziran kriminal zagotavlja terorističnim organizacijam možnost sodelovanja pri nezakonitem trgovanju po poteh, ki jih običajno sam uporablja, s čimer se ustvarjajo ilegalni dobički, ki se nato uporabljajo za teroristične dejavnosti,
L. whereas organised crime can offer terrorist organisations opportunities to engage in illegal trafficking through the channels which it normally uses itself, thus generating illegal profits to be used for terrorist activities,
M. ker mora v tej bitki s časom in prostorom boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu nujno prilagoditi sredstva in metode, ki jih ima na razpolago, obenem pa razviti sposobnost predvidevanja, zlasti na podlagi ustrezne in največje možne uporabe potencialnih virov obveščanja,
M. whereas, in this battle against time and space, the fight against organised crime must urgently adapt the means and methods available to it while developing an ability to anticipate, based principally on the appropriate and maximum use of potential intelligence sources,