natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
s priporočili Komisiji o statutu evropskega podjetja v zasebni lasti
with recommendations to the Commission on the European private company statute
PRILOGA K PREDLOGU RESOLUCIJE:
ANNEX TO THE DRAFT RESOLUTION:................................................................................5
– ob upoštevanju členov 39 in 45 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 39 and 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 21. maja 2003 z naslovom „Posodobitev prava gospodarskih družb in izboljšanje upravljanja podjetij v Evropski uniji – načrt za korak naprej“ ( KOM(2003)0284 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 21 May 2003 entitled 'Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union - A Plan to Move Forward' ( COM(2003)0284 ),
– ob upoštevanju javnega posvetovanja s Komisijo o prihodnjih prednostnih nalogah akcijskega načrta za posodobitev prava gospodarskih družb in izboljšanje upravljanja podjetij ter njegovih rezultatih,
– having regard to the public hearing held by the Commission on the future priorities of the action plan to modernise company law and corporate governance and the outcome thereof,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0434/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0434/2006 ),
A. ker je izpolnjen pogoj iz člena 39(2), da ni nobenega predloga v pripravi,
A. whereas the condition in Rule 39(2), that no proposal should be in preparation, is duly fulfilled,
B. ker je bilo pri javnem posvetovanju z odborom Evropskega parlamenta za pravne zadeve 22. junija 2006 poudarjeno, da je treba uvesti evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti kot pravno obliko za mala in srednja podjetja, ki poslujejo čez mejo,
B. whereas the public hearing held in the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs on 22 June 2006 underscored the need for a European Private Company as a legal form for small and medium-sized undertakings engaged in cross-border business,
C. ker je treba omogočiti, da lahko evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti v Skupnosti ustanovi ena ali več fizičnih ali pravnih oseb, katerih sedež ni nujno v državi članici, v skladu s predpisi in postopkovnimi pravili Skupnosti, ki jih je treba določiti v uredbi,
C. whereas it should be possible for one or more natural or legal persons who do not necessarily reside in a Member State to establish a European Private Company (EPC) on Community territory, in accordance with Community law and procedure which will have to be set out in a regulation,
D. ker mora biti evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti pravna oseba in mora odgovarjati za svoje obveznosti le s premoženjem družbe,
D. whereas an EPC should possess legal personality and its liability for debts to creditors should be limited to its assets,
E. ker daje evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti poleg nacionalnih oblik podjetij dodatno in prostovoljno možnost izbire pri ustanavljanju podjetij;
E. whereas the EPC offers companies an additional, voluntary option, alongside national company forms, in terms of how they may constitute themselves,
F. ker je treba omogočiti, da evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti izbere monistično ali dualistično strukturo,
F. whereas the EPC should be able to choose between a monistic or dualistic structure,
G. ker mora biti evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti v državi sedeža vpisano v register, pristojen po nacionalnih določbah v skladu z direktivo 68/151/EGS, z naslovom podjetja za vročanje pošiljk, ob upoštevanju mehanizmov za preverjanje vsebinske ustreznosti in pristnosti ustanovnega akta,
G. whereas the EPC should be registered in the country in which the head office is located in the appropriate register in accordance with national provisions pursuant to Directive 68/151/EEC with a valid business address, taking into account mechanisms for verifying the substantive correctness and authenticity of the constitutive instrument,
1. poziva Komisijo, da leta 2007 na podlagi člena 308 Pogodbe ES predloži Parlamentu zakonodajni predlog o statutu evropskega podjetja v zasebni lasti, ki ga je treba pripraviti v okviru medinstitucionalnih posvetovanj in v skladu s podrobnimi priporočili iz priloge;
Requests the Commission during 2007 to submit to Parliament, on the basis of Article 308 of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal on the Statute for a European Private Company and requests that this proposal be drawn up within the framework of interinstitutional deliberations and in accordance with the detailed recommendations set out in the Annex hereto;
PRILOGA K PREDLOGU RESOLUCIJE:
ANNEX TO THE DRAFT RESOLUTION:
NATANČNA PRIPOROČILA O VSEBINI ZAHTEVANEGA PREDLOGA
DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE CONTENT OF THE REQUESTED PROPOSAL
Priporočilo 1 (o pravni obliki podjetja v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti)
Recommendation 1 (Community law as a basis for the type of company)
Evropski parlament meni, da mora statut evropskega podjetja v zasebni lasti vključevati čim več pravnih določb Skupnosti in se v skladu s tem izogniti sklicevanju na nacionalno zakonodajo ter tako biti zastavljen kot celovit in dokončen statut.
The European Parliament takes the view that an EPC Statute should be based as far as possible on Community legislation and thus dispense with references to national law: it should therefore be conceived as a uniform and definitive statute.
Zato je treba gospodarskopravne določbe uredbe uporabljati zgolj za evropska podjetja v zasebni lasti in področja, ki so urejena s to uredbo, izvzeti iz zakonodaje držav članic.
The company law provisions of the regulation on the statute for a European Company should therefore apply exclusively, and the areas of law regulated in this regulation should be withdrawn from the jurisdiction of Member States.
To velja za pravno naravo, pravno in poslovno sposobnost, ustanovitev, spreminjanje družbene pogodbe, preoblikovanje in prenehanje, za ime oziroma firmo, organiziranost, pooblastila organov, za pridobitev in izgubo članstva ter s tem povezane pravice in dolžnosti, za odgovornost družbe, poslovodij, članov organov in družbenikov, odgovornega za obveznosti družbe, pa tudi za minimalne standarde glede obveznosti poslovodstva do družbe; statut bi moral vsebovati tudi določbe o delovanju organov družbe, o vrstah večine pri glasovanju, o posvetovanju družbenikov ter pogojih nakupa in prodaje deležev družbe; določbe se lahko oblikujejo posamično glede na potrebe družbe.
This applies with regard to a company's legal status, legal capacity and capacity to act, its establishment, modification of its articles of association, its transformation and dissolution, and its name or business name; the organisational structure, the representative powers of company bodies, the acquisition and loss of membership and the rights and duties associated therewith, the liability of the company, of the executive directors, of the members of its bodies and of its members in respect of the company's obligations, as well as minimum standards concerning the duties of management vis-à-vis the company; moreover, the Statute should include provisions on the way in which the company bodies operate, voting majorities, the consultation of members and conditions governing the purchase and sale of shares in the company; it should be possible for such provisions to be framed individually, in accordance with the company's needs.
Za druga področja se načeloma uporablja statut, predpisi, ki so nad njim, pa le subsidiarno in v naslednjem vrstnem redu: drugi predpisi Skupnosti; določbe o primerljivih pravnih oblikah podjetij države članice, v kateri ima podjetje statutarni sedež.
In other areas the statute should fundamentally apply, and rules going beyond it should apply only in a subsidiary manner, in the following order of precedence: other Community law; the provisions governing comparable types of company in the Member State in which the company has its registered office.
Primerljive ustrezne oblike podjetij v zadevnih državah članicah je treba navesti v prilogi.
The relevant types of company in the respective Member States should be listed in an Annex.
Priporočilo 2 (o ustanovnih postopkih)
Recommendation 2 (procedures for establishment)
Evropski parlament meni, da bi moralo biti mogoče evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti ustanoviti ex nihilo ali na podlagi obstoječega podjetja ali kot posledica združitve podjetij ali v okviru skupne hčerinske družbe.
The European Parliament takes the view that it should be possible for a European Private Company to be established ex nihilo , or on the basis of an existing company, or following a merger between companies or in the context of a common subsidiary.
Poleg tega mora biti mogoče preoblikovati podjetje v zasebni lasti v evropsko družbo.
In addition, it must be possible to transform a European Private Company into a European Company.
Priporočilo 3 (o osnovnem kapitalu)
Recommendation 3 (capital stock)
Evropski parlament meni, da mora biti osnovni kapital evropskega podjetja v zasebni lasti razdeljen na deleže z določeno nominalno vrednostjo; da morajo biti deleži družbenikov izraženi v polnem znesku v EUR; da mora biti najnižji kapital 10.000 EUR ali protivrednost v drugi valuti na dan registracije; da najnižjega kapitala, ki določa obseg odgovornosti družbenikov, ni treba nujno vplačati.
The European Parliament takes the view that the capital stock of the EPC should be divided into shares with a specific nominal value; that members' shares should be rounded off in full euros; that the minimum capital should be EUR 10 000 or the equivalent in another currency at the time of registration; and that the minimum capital which determines the liability of members would not necessarily have to be paid in.
Priporočilo 4 (o organizaciji)
Recommendation 4 (organisation)
Evropski parlament predlaga, da mora imeti evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti najmanj enega poslovodjo in da je treba prvega poslovodjo imenovati s sklepom družbenikov ali družbeno pogodbo; da poslovodja ne sme biti oseba, ki po odločbi sodišča ali upravnega organa države članice ne sme biti imenovana na delovno mesto, primerljivo z delovnim mestom poslovodje.
The European Parliament proposes that the EPC should have at least one executive director and that the first executive directors should be appointed by decision of the members or in the articles of association; that no person who has been prohibited by decision of a court or administrative authority of a Member State from occupying a position comparable to that of executive director may be executive director.
Priporočilo 5 (o vsebini družbene pogodbe)
Recommendation 5 (content of articles of association)
Evropski parlament predlaga, da mora družbena pogodba vključevati naslednje podatke: pravno obliko in firmo podjetja; trajanje podjetja, če je omejeno; dejavnost podjetja; sedež podjetja; kapital podjetja in organ ali organe, ki lahko zastopajo podjetje proti tretjim osebam in na sodišču; ter vložek vsakega družbenika glede na prevzeti delež v podjetju.
The European Parliament proposes that the articles of association contain the following information: the legal form and business name of the company; the duration of the company's life, if limited; the business object; the registered office of the company; the company capital and the body or bodies entitled to represent the company vis-à-vis third parties and in court; and the contribution to be made by each member in respect of the company shares held by him or her.
Priporočilo 6 (o odgovornosti poslovodje)
Recommendation 6 (liability of the executive director)
Evropski parlament meni, da mora poslovodja ali poslovodje evropskega podjetja v zasebni lasti posamezno ali solidarno odgovarjati podjetju za vsako ravnanje, ki je v nasprotju s civilno- in kazenskopravnimi predpisi.
The European Parliament takes the view that the executive director or directors of the EPC must be liable individually or jointly and severally vis-à-vis the company for all acts committed contrary to the provisions of civil and criminal law applicable to the company;
Priporočilo 7 (o odgovornosti poslovodij in družbenikov pri zmanjšanju kapitala)
Recommendation 7 (liability of executive directors and members in the event of a reduction in net worth)
Evropski parlament meni, da morajo organi evropskega podjetja v zasebni lasti kot solidarni dolžniki odgovarjati za škodo, ki nastane pri poslovanju zaradi zmanjšanja premoženja tega podjetja v korist organa podjetja, družbenika ali bližnje osebe; da mora biti za prejemnika neupravičenega plačila ali storitve tega podjetja obvezno vračilo; da mora oseba odgovarjati le, kadar ravnanje ni v popolnem interesu evropskega podjetja v zasebni lasti; da odgovornost ne velja zlasti tedaj, ko je evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti vključeno v celovito skupinsko politiko in ko morebitne pomanjkljivosti odtehtajo prednosti skupinske pripadnosti; da se odgovornost poslovodij ali družbenikov v skladu z drugimi pravni predpisi ne sme spremeniti.
The European Parliament takes the view that company bodies should be liable as the joint and several debtor for liabilities incurred by the EPC where the assets of the EPC have been reduced for the benefit of a company body, a member or a person closely associated with one of these through acts of the company; that the recipient of an unwarranted payment by the company should be responsible for refunding it; that liability should only occur if the act was not in the true interests of the EPC; that liability does not occur, in particular, if the EPC is integrated with a consistent group policy and any disadvantages are offset by the advantages of it belonging to a group; and that the liability of the executive directors or members under other legal provisions should not be thereby affected.
Priporočilo 8 (o prilogah k uredbi)
Recommenda tion 8 (annexes to the regulation)
Evropski parlament predlaga, da mora uredba vključevati naslednje priloge:
The European Parliament proposes that the regulation contain the following annexes:
(a) modele družbenih pogodb, ki jih lahko družbeniki prevzamejo delno ali v celoti;
(a) model articles of association which members may adopt wholly or in part;
(b) oblike podjetij za posamezno državo članico, ki so enakovredne evropskemu podjetju v zasebni lasti na področjih, ki niso urejena z uredbo, zlasti v zvezi z uporabo računovodskih, kazenskopravnih, socialnopravnih in delovnopravnih predpisov;
(b) for every Member State the types of company with which the EPC is equated in respect of areas not covered by the regulation, in particular the implementation of accounting, penal, social and labour law provisions;
(c) poimenovanje organov podjetja v posameznih uradnih jezikih Evropske unije.
(c) the designations of the company bodies in the various official languages of the European Union.
Priporočilo 9 (o letnih računovodskih izkazih)
Recommendation 9 (annual accounts)
Evropski parlament meni, da se morajo za evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti uporabljati usklajeni računovodski predpisi (kakor je navedeno v direktivah 78/660/EGS
The European Parliament considers that the EPC should be subject to the harmonised accounting provisions (as contained in Directives 78/660/EEC
Četrta Direktiva Sveta 78/660/EGS z dne 25. julija 1978 o letnih računovodskih izkazih posameznih vrst družb, ki temelji na členu 54(3)(g) Pogodbe (UL L 222, 14.8.1978, str.
Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies (OJ L 222, 14.8.1978, p.
Direktiva, kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2006/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 224, 16.8.2006, str.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 224, 16.8.2006, p.
1). in 83/349/EGS
1). and 83/349/EEC
Sedma Direktiva Sveta 83/349/EGS z dne 13. junija 1983 o konsolidiranih računovodskih izkazih, ki temelji na členu 54(3)(g) Pogodbe (UL L 193, 18.7.1983, str.
Seventh Council Directive 83/349/EEC of 13 June 1983 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on consolidated accounts (OJ L 193, 18.7.1983, p.
Direktiva, kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2006/46/ES. ), ki se v posamezni državi uporabljajo za primerljivo obliko podjetja.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/46/EC. ) which apply in each Member State to the equivalent type of company.
Priporočilo 10 (o možnostih preoblikovanja)
Recommendation 10 (conversion)
Priporočilo 11 (o prenehanju, likvidaciji, plačilni nezmožnosti in ustavitvi plačil)
Recommendation 11 (dissolution, liquidation, insolvency and suspension of payments)
Evropski parlament meni, da so poslovodje evropskih podjetij v zasebni lasti v primeru plačilne nezmožnosti brez krivdnega odlašanja, vendar najpozneje v treh tednih, dolžni zahtevati uvedbo stečajnega postopka; da morajo v primeru kršitve te obveznosti neposredno in solidarno odgovarjati upnikom, ki so zaradi tega oškodovani; da se morajo razen tega za evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti v zvezi s prenehanjem ali likvidacijo, plačilno nezmožnostjo in stečajem ter podobnimi postopki uporabljati predpisi, ki se uporabljajo za podjetja v posamezni državi članici, v skladu s to uredbo enakovredna evropskemu podjetju v zasebni lasti; glede plačilne nezmožnosti je treba uporabiti predpise z upravnega sedeža podjetja.
The European Parliament considers that the executive directors of an EPC must be obliged to apply for insolvency proceedings to be initiated without undue delay, and at the latest three weeks after a state of insolvency arises; that they should be directly and jointly and severally liable in the event of a dereliction of this duty vis-à-vis creditors who thereby incur losses; that furthermore, in respect of dissolution, liquidation, insolvency or the suspension of payments and comparable procedures, the EPC should be subject to the provisions applicable to companies to which they are equated in each Member State through this regulation; and that the regulations in force at the company's head office should apply where insolvency is concerned.
Namen statuta evropskega podjetja v zasebni lasti je malim in srednjim podjetjem v Evropi ponuditi obliko podjetja, ki bo omogočalo lažje čezmejno poslovanje.
The European Private Company Statute is intended to provide small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Europe with a form of company which will make it easier for them to conduct cross-border business.
Dejstvo, da je treba pripraviti takšen statut, je bilo izpostavljeno pri posvetovanju z Odborom Evropskega parlamenta za pravne zadeve 22. junija 2006.
The need for such a statute was most recently voiced at a hearing of the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs on 22 June 2006.
Za dokončno vzpostavitev notranjega trga ter želeno izboljšanje gospodarskih in socialnih razmer v Skupnosti, je treba dati prednost zlasti odpravi trgovinskih ovir.
In order to consolidate the single market and thereby achieve the desired improvement in the economic and social conditions in the Community, one clear priority is the elimination of barriers to trade.
Tak pristop bi bil premalo brez hkratnih prizadevanj za razvoj proizvodnih dejavnikov v vsej Skupnosti in njihovo prilagoditev na notranjemu trgu, ki se združuje.
However, such an approach in itself would be incomplete without parallel efforts to further develop Community factors of production and to adapt them to the increasingly cohesive single market.
Glede na to, da evropska družba pokriva velike kapitalske družbe, je evropsko podjetje v zasebni lasti usmerjeno zlasti na mala in srednja podjetja.
While the European Company (SE) covers large limited companies, the EPC focuses on SMEs.
Statut evropske družbe je nastajal dolgo, rezultat ni zadovoljiv in trg je še ni sprejel kot pravne oblike kapitalske družbe.
The SE Statute took a long time to develop and the outcome is unsatisfactory, for the market has not yet adopted the SE as a company form for limited companies.
Razlog za to je tudi, da evropska družba ni enotna evropska oblika podjetja, ampak je zaradi pogostega sklicevanja na nacionalno zakonodajo ostala nepopolna struktura.
One reason for this is that the SE is not a uniform European form of company, but has remained a patchwork owing to the many references to national law.
To povečuje pravno negotovost in je povezano s prevelikimi stroški.
This increases legal uncertainty and is expensive.
Stališče poročevalca
Point of view of the rapporteur
V statutu evropskega podjetja v zasebni lasti se je treba izogniti pomanjkljivostim statuta evropske družbe.
The EPC Statute should avoid the disadvantages of the SE Statute.
Zato je treba čim bolj omejiti sklicevanje na nacionalno zakonodajo in ustvariti enotno evropsko obliko podjetja.
It should therefore dispense as far as possible with references to national law and create a uniform European form of company.
Tako se samodejno znižajo stroški svetovanja, ker se pri čezmejnih dejavnostih ne uporablja več zakonodaja različnih držav članic, ampak enoten statut.
This would automatically cut consultancy costs, since cross-border activities would no longer be subject to the law of individual Member States but to a uniform statute.
Običajno pa bo potrebno sklicevanje na nacionalno zakonodajo, zlasti na usklajenih področjih zakonodaje (npr. register ali računovodstvo).
Some references will, however, be necessary in particular in harmonised areas of the law (for instance registers or accounting).
Potreba po enotnosti temelji na dejstvu, da mala in srednja podjetja pogosto opravljajo čezmejno dejavnost prek prodajnih in storitvenih hčerinskih podjetij.
The need for uniformity arises from the fact that SMEs are in many cases active across borders through marketing or after-sales service companies (subsidiaries).
Za lažje izvajanje te dejavnosti bi se morala v idealnih okoliščinah v vseh državah članicah uporabljati enaka pravila za ustanovitev in vodenje hčerinskih podjetij.
In order to make things easier for undertakings, subsidiaries should ideally be set up and managed in all Member States according to the same rules.
Na tem področju je treba uporabiti usklajeno zakonodajo Skupnosti, kolikor je to mogoče.
Harmonised Community law should be used here as far as possible.
V zvezi s tem je jasno, da bo treba sprejeti tudi direktivo o čezmejni spremembi statutarnega sedeža.
In this connection, the urgent need for a directive on cross-border relocations of company registered offices is clear.
Razen poenostavitve na področju ustanavljanja in organizacije je treba s statutom urediti tudi druga področja.
However, a statute must do more than merely make it easier to set up and organise companies.
Med drugim mora ustrezno izenačiti organe v podjetju ter prispevati k varnosti poslovanja in zaščititi upnike podjetja.
Firstly, it must strike a fair balance between the bodies within a company; secondly it must also contribute to the security of business transactions and protect a company’s creditors.
To se lahko doseže na primer z uravnoteženimi pravili o odgovornosti.
This takes place for example through balanced rules on liability.
Razmerje med varstvom upnikov in prožnimi pravili za ustanovitev podjetja bo obravnavano tudi pri pravilih o osnovnem kapitalu.
The relationship between creditor protection and flexible company start-up rules is also discussed in connection with the rules on stock capital.
Namen priporočila je ohraniti načelo najnižjega kapitala in opustiti obveznost gotovinskega vplačila.
The recommendation is minded to retain the principle of minimum capital, but to dispense with the obligation to make cash payments.
Varstvo upnikov vključuje tudi prepovedi izplačil, zato da se za upnike ohrani najnižji kapital podjetja, da se jim omogoči dostop do premoženja, ki so ga nezakonito pridobili posamezni družbeniki.
A further aspect of creditor protection are the restrictions on disbursements, so as to ensure that the minimum capital of the company remains for creditors and that assets unduly paid to individual members can be retrieved.