natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pristojni organi morajo imeti pravico, da v primeru nesreče pridobijo natančne podatke o masnih deležih posamičnih krmil, vsebovanih v krmi.
Competent authorities should have the right to obtain the exact percentages used in feedstuffs in case of calamities
Predlog odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o popravku Direktive št. 2002/2 o trženju krmnih mešanic temelji na sodbi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 6. decembra 2005.
The basis for the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council correcting Directive 2002/2/EC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs is a ruling by the European Court of Justice of 6 December 2005.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je zaradi več medsebojno povezanih postopkov (primeri C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 in C-194/04) obravnavalo zakonitost predpisov iz direktive o „odprtem označevanju sestave krmnih mešanic“.
In a number of joined cases (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04) the Court examined the legality of the provisions adopted in the directive relating to the 'open declaration' of the composition of compound feedingstuffs.
To „odprto označevanje“ sestavin krme je bila ena od glavnih zahtev Evropskega parlamenta po krizi z BSE in v okviru zahtev za Komisijo, ki jih je postavil začasni preiskovalni odbor za BSE (glej resolucijo z dne 19. februarja 1997 o sklepih začasnega preiskovalnega odbora za BSE).
This 'open declaration' of the ingredients used in feedingstuffs was one of the key demands of the European Parliament following the BSE crisis and in the light of the calls made to the Commission by the Temporary Committee of Inquiry into BSE (see resolution of 19 February 1997 on the results of the Temporary Committee of Inquiry into BSE).
Parlament je dal velik poudarek ne le potrebi po zagotavljanju čim večjega varstva potrošnikov temveč tudi možnosti, da se na podlagi jasne in pregledne oznake sami odločijo, katera živila katerega izvora bodo izbrali glede na varnost in zdravje.
Parliament placed great emphasis on the need to ensure not only that consumers are protected as effectively as possible, but also that they are able, with the help of clear and transparent labelling, to decide for themselves which foods, of what origin, to choose, bearing in mind safety and health considerations.
To mora veljati tudi za kmete, ki so pri nakupu krmnih mešanic odvisni od enoznačnih oznak.
The same should also apply to farmers, who are also dependent on clear labelling when purchasing compound feedingstuffs.
Komisija je z zakonodajnim predlogom KOM(1999)744 o spremembi Direktive 79/373/EGS o trženju krmnih mešanic predložila ustrezen predlog, ki je predvidel seznam posamičnih krmil z navedbo natančnega masnega deleža v odstotkih.
In its legislative proposal COM(1999)744 amending Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs, the Commission submitted a proposal along those lines providing for feed materials to be listed, with a declaration of the exact percentages by weight.
Čeprav je Evropski parlament v prvi obravnavi ponovno potrdil te ukrepe, je Svet močno nasprotoval odprtemu označevanju.
Whilst the EP supported these measures at first reading, there was strong opposition within the Council to the 'open declaration' approach.
Zahteve iz druge obravnave so bile sprejete z veliko večino v odboru (23 : 1) in (tudi skoraj soglasno) na plenarnem zasedanju.
The proposals for amendment at second reading were adopted by an overwhelming majority in committee (23:1) and in plenary (again almost unanimously).
V spravnem odboru sta obe veji zakonodajne oblasti Skupnosti dosegli sporazum, ki je v osnovi sestavljen iz naslednjih določb:
In the subsequent conciliation procedure the two arms of the Union legislature reached an agreement based essentially on the following rules:
Ø obvezno označevanje posamičnih krmil na etiketi ali v navodilih z navedbo masnega deleža v odstotkih, pri čemer je dopustno odstopanje +/– 15 % od dane vrednosti (člen 1(4) Direktive 2002/2/ES; člen 5c Direktive 79/373/EGS);
Ø compulsory declaration of feed materials on the label or in the accompanying instructions, with an indication of the percentages by weight; a tolerance of +/- 15% of the declared value to be permitted (Article 1(4) of Directive 2002/2/EC; Article 5c of Directive 79/373/EEC);
Ø natančna navedba sestave krmne mešanice na zahtevo strank (člen 1(1) Direktive 2002/2/ES; člen 5(1)(l) Direktive 79/373/EGS).
Ø information on the exact composition of the compound feedingstuff to be provided at the customer's request (Article 1(1) of Directive 2002/2/EC; Article 5(1)(l) of Directive 79/373/EEC).
Veliko podjetij iz Združenega kraljestva, Italije in Nizozemske se je pritožilo zoper izvajanje Direktive 2002/2/ES v nacionalni zakonodaji.
A number of companies in the United Kingdom, Italy and the Netherlands brought actions against the transposition of Directive 2002/2/EC into national law.
Ti primeri so služili za podlago za sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 6. decembra 2005.
It is in the light of these cases that the Court of Justice ruled on 6 December 2005.
V posameznih tožbah je bilo sporno, da
The individual actions were based on complaints that:
Ø direktiva ni pravnomočna, ker je bila sprejeta na podlagi člena 152(4) Pogodbe;
Ø the directive is invalid, as it was adopted on the basis of Article 152 (4) of the Treaty;
Ø so predpisi o označevanju iz člena 1(1) in (4) v nasprotju z načelom enakega obravnavanja in nediskriminacije;
Ø the labelling provisions in Article 1(1)(4) contravene the principle of equal treatment and non‑discrimination;
Ø so zgoraj omenjeni predpisi o označevanju v nasprotju z načelom sorazmernosti;
Ø the labelling provisions in question contravene the principle of proportionality;
Ø direktive brez pozitivnega seznama posamičnih krmil iz desete uvodne izjave ni mogoče uporabljati.
Ø the directive cannot be applied without the positive list of feed materials called for in the tenth recital.
Sodišče je v sodbi enoznačno potrdilo zakonitost direktive in zavrglo večino kritik s strani tožnikov.
In its judgment the Court unequivocally confirmed the legality of the Directive and rejected the majority of criticisms made by the claimants.
Le v eni točki je Sodišče upoštevalo argumente tožnikov in kritiziralo „natančne podatke na zahtevo“ iz člena1(1) kot nesorazmerne glede na cilj direktive (varovanje zdravja).
The Court accepted the claimants' arguments only in respect of one point, criticising the requirements in Article 1(1) for exact information to be provided on request as disproportionate in relation to the stated objective of the directive, namely to protect public health.
Po mnenju Sodišča so prednosti direktive (sledljivost, možnost hitrega odziva pri onesnaženju sestavine krmila) zagotovljene s členom 1(4) uredbe.
In the view of the Court, Article 1(4) ensures that the benefits of the directive (traceability, rapid reaction in the event of an ingredient in feedingstuffs being contaminated) are able to be achieved.
Zato je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti razsodilo, da je člen 1(1)(b) glede na načelo sorazmernosti neveljaven.
The Court has therefore ruled that Article 1(1)(b) is invalid in the light of the principle of proportionality.
Zakonodajalec mora na podlagi člena 233 Pogodbe sprejeti ukrepe, ki izhajajo iz sodbe.
Article 233 of the Treaty requires the legislator to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court.
Komisija v predlogu predvideva črtanje spornega odstavka Direktive 2000/2/ES.
In its proposal, the Commission provides for the contested paragraph of Directive 2002/2/EC to be deleted.
Evropski parlament je v svojih izvajanjih pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti opozoril na dodaten cilj spornega odstavka, in sicer povečati preglednost trgovine s krmo ter končno omogočiti imetnikom živali, da sprejmejo zavestno odločitev o krmilih, s katerimi bodo krmili živali (odstavek 75 sodbe).
In its submissions to the Court of Justice, the EP pointed out that the contested paragraph has a further objective, namely that it is aimed at improving transparency in trade in feedingstuffs and ultimately enabling breeders to make an informed decision on what to feed to their animals (paragraph 75 of the judgement).
Poročevalec razen tega poudarja, da je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti preučilo razmerje med dodano vrednostjo natančnih podatkov na zahtevo za varovanje zdravja in nastalim bremenom za proizvajalca.
Your rapporteur also attaches importance to the fact that the Court of Justice weighed the additional benefits, in terms of protecting public health, of providing exact information on request against the resulting costs for manufacturers.
Zato bi se splačalo razpravljati o oblikovanju sporazuma, ki bi ustrezal sodbi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in potrebam udeležencev na trgu ter upošteval načelo sorazmernosti.
It may therefore be worthwhile putting forward a compromise form of wording for discussion, which both takes account of the judgment of the Court and the concerns of market operators and observes the principle of proportionality.
Proizvajalci krmnih mešanic so na veliko razpravah opozorili na to, da je vprašanje varstva intelektualne lastnine, ki se je pojavilo pred Sodiščem, zlasti pomembno v zvezi s tako imenovanimi mikrosestavinami (posamičnimi krmili, ki so v manjših količinah prisotni v krmnih mešanicah).
In a number of discussions, manufacturers of compound feedingstuffs have pointed out that the issue of the protection of intellectual property raised before the courts is particularly important in relation to micro-ingredients (feed materials present in small amounts in compound feedingstuffs).
Poročevalec zato predlaga, da se ohrani načelo „natančnih podatkov na zahtevo“ ter da se sporni člen uporablja le za glavne sestavine krmnih mešanic, sestavin z masnim deležem pod 2 % pa na podlagi klavzule de minimis ni treba „natančno“ navesti.
Your rapporteur is therefore proposing that the principle of providing exact information on request should be retained, but that this contested article should only apply to the main ingredients of compound feedingstuffs and that, on the basis of a de minimis clause, ingredients representing a percentage by weight of less than 2% should be exempted from the requirement to give an 'exact' declaration.
Poročevalec meni, da je tak sporazum glede na sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti povsem sorazmeren.
In the light of the Court of Justice judgment, your rapporteur regards such a compromise as entirely proportionate.
Upoštevani so pomisleki Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zvezi z varstvom intelektualne lastnine; dodatni zastavljeni cilj preglednosti in zavestne odločitve potrošnikov pa je upoštevan bolje kot pri črtanju, ki ga je predlagala Komisija.
It takes into account the Court's reservations with regard to the protection of intellectual property, and takes greater account than the deletion proposed by the Commission of the additional objective of ensuring transparency and enabling consumers to make informed decisions.
Končno je treba opozoriti na to, da se zdaj pripravlja podobna ureditev „navedbe sestavin na zahtevo“ za kozmetične izdelke, ki krepi pravice potrošnikov do informacij, „brez poseganja v poslovne skrivnosti in pravice intelektualne lastnine“.
Finally, it should be pointed out that similar rules on providing information on ingredients on request are currently being drawn up for cosmetic products, which strengthen consumers' rights to information without prejudice to the protection of commercial secrecy and of intellectual property rights.
Glej Sporočilo za medije IP 06-1127 Komisije z dne 28. avgusta 2006.
See Commission press release IP 06-1127, 28.8.2006
Predlog Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o popravku Direktive 2002/2/ES o spremembi Direktive Sveta 79/373/EGS o trženju krmnih mešanic
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council correcting Directive 2002/2/EC amending Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o prilagoditvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, Uredbe (ES) št. 318/2006 o skupni ureditvi trgov v sektorju sladkorja in Uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006 o ustanovitvi začasne sheme za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja v Skupnosti zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council regulation adapting Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector and Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0677 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0677 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 4(3) Pogodbe o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije in člena 41, pododstavka 2, ter člena 20 v povezavi s Prilogo IV k Aktu o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0424/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 4(3) of the Treaty of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania and Article 41, second subparagraph, and Article 20 of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, in conjunction with Annex IV thereto, pursuant to which it has been consulted by the Council ( C6-0424/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6‑0412/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0412/2006 ),
Predlog uredbe Sveta o prilagoditvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, Uredbe (ES) št. 318/2006 o skupni ureditvi trgov v sektorju sladkorja in Uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006 o ustanovitvi začasne sheme za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja v Skupnosti zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
Proposal for a Council regulation adapting Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector and Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o spremembi Sklepa 2001/886/PNZ o razvoju druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)
on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2001/886/JHA on the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
PE 380.696v01-00
PE 380.696v03-00
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2006)0383 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0383 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 30(1)(a) in (b), člena 31(1)(a) in (b) ter člena 34(2)(c) Pogodbe o EU,
– having regard to Article 30(1)(a) and (b), Article 31(1)(a) and (b) and Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe o EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0297/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0297/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0413/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0413/2006 ),
Evropski parlament je bil v pismu z dne 11. septembra 2006 zaprošen za mnenje o dveh predlogih glede schengenskega informacijskega sistema II (SIS II).
By letter of 11 September 2006, the European Parliament was consulted on two proposals on the Schengen Information System II (SIS II).
Prva zadeva se nanaša na predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2424/2001 o razvoju druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) na osnovi člena 66 Pogodbe o ES.
The first saisine concerns the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 on the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), which is based on Article 66 of the EC Treaty.
Druga zadeva se nanaša na predlog sklepa Sveta o spremembi Sklepa 2001/886/PNZ o razvoju druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) in temelji na členih 30(1)(a) in (b), 31(1)(a) in (b) ter 34 (2)(c) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
The second saisine concerns the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2001/886/JHA on the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), based on Articles 30(1)(a) and (b), 31(1)(a) and (b) and 34(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union.
Tako imenovani „schengenski paket“ sestavljajo poročila A6-0353/2006 , vzpostavitev, delovanje in uporaba SIS II (sklep); A-60354/2006, dostop služb držav članic, pristojnih za izdajo potrdil o registraciji vozil, do SIS II; ter A-6-0355/2006, vzpostavitev, delovanje in uporaba SIS II (uredba); ki so bila z veliko večino sprejeta 25. oktobra 2006.
The so-called 'Schengen package' consists of A6-0353/2006 , establishment, operation and use of SIS II (decision), A6-0354/2006 , access to SIS II by the services responsible for issuing vehicle registration certificates, and A6-0355/2006 , establishment, operation and use of SIS II (regulation), which were adopted by a large majority on 25 October 2006.
SIS je obsežna baza podatkov, ki deluje kot skupni informacijski sistem ter pristojnim organom držav članic omogoča sodelovanje in izmenjavo potrebnih podatkov za vzpostavitev območja brez kontrol na notranjih mejah.
The SIS is a large-scale database that works as a common information system allowing the competent authorities in the Member States to cooperate and exchange the necessary information in order to establish an area without internal border controls.
Tem organom omogoča, da pridobijo podatke o razpisanih ukrepih glede oseb in stvari, ki so shranjeni v sistemu.
It allows these authorities to obtain information related to alerts on persons and objects entered in the system.
Zato je postal nujen razvoj novega sistema, ki bo državam članicam omogočil celovito izvajanje schengenskega pravnega reda in s tem odpravljanje kontrol na njihovih notranjih mejah z drugimi državami schengenskega območja.
Therefore it became indispensable to develop a new system to allow the new Member States to fully apply the Schengen acquis and thus to abolish controls at their internal borders with other Schengen States.
Ko so se schengenski ureditvi priključile nordijske države, je bila razvita nekoliko posodobljena različica SIS (SIS 1+), ki je vključevala možnost, da se na obstoječi sistem priključita še dve ali tri države.
Meanwhile a more up-to-date version of the SIS was developed (SIS 1+) when the Nordic countries joined Schengen, which included the possibility of linking two or three additional countries to the system.
Vzporedno s tehnično izvedbo so bile tudi razprave o novih zahtevah SIS na dnevnem redu Sveta, ki je v letih 2003 in 2004 sprejel določeno število sklepov o funkcionalnosti SIS II.
In parallel to the technical implementation, discussions on new requirements of the SIS have been on the agenda of the Council, which adopted a number of conclusions on the functionalities of the SIS II in 2003 and 2004.
Navkljub obstoju treh zakonodajnih besedil, ki so uvrščena v različna postopka (soodločanje in posvetovanje), gre za enoten paket, saj SIS II deluje kot en sam informacijski sistem.
Despite having three legal texts following different procedures (codecision and consultation), they form an inseparable package as the SIS II operates as a single information system.
Z veliko večino pri glasovanju je bil potrjen tudi na plenarnem zasedanju 25. oktobra.
The vote was confirmed, with a large majority, at the plenary sitting of 25 October.
- izvajalci, ki v razpisnih postopkih za oblikovanje novega sistema niso bili izbrani, so glede tega sprožili postopke pred sodiščem,
- Court cases brought by contractors who lost out in the call for tender proceedings to set up the new SIS,
- Komisija je imela tudi težave z izvajalci, ki jih je najela za oblikovanje te baze podatkov, njen zagon in upravljanje z njo,
- The Commission also had problems with the contractors it hired to create this database and get it up and running,
- junija 2006 so bile prvič napovedane zamude v časovnem načrtu projekta zaradi zamud pri pripravljalnih delih, povezanih z osrednjim objektom v Strasbourgu, kjer bo sedež baze podatkov.
- It was announced for the first time, in June 2006, that there would be delays to the project schedule owing to delays in preparatory work relating to the main site in Strasbourg, where the database is to be housed.
Glede na to, da je bil porabljen celoten manevrski prostor za zamude projekta, ki ga je Komisija vključila že v njegovo načrtovanje, in v projektu ni več prostora za dodatne zamude, preprosto ni mogoče uresničiti cilja, po katerem naj bi SIS II začel delovati marca 2007.
Having no further room for more delays in the project given that the margins for delay built into the Commission's project planning have all been used up, the March 2007 target to have the SIS II operational simply cannot be met.
Posledično je bilo treba revidirati celoten časovni načrt projekta ter pri tem upoštevati in poskušati kar najbolj zmanjšati obseg posledic te zamude za odpravljanje notranjih kontrol na mejah z novimi državami članicami EU, ki izpolnjujejo zahtevane pogoje, da lahko postanejo del schengenskega območja.
Consequently, it was necessary to revise the global project schedule so as to take account of this delay and try to minimise the extent to which it will affect the lifting of internal border controls with the new EU Member States, which meet the conditions required in order to enter the Schengen Area.
Na osnovi tako imenovanega „dokumenta o celoviti časovni prerazporeditvi SIS II“ ( Global SIS II Rescheduling document ) je predvideno, da bi testiranje, potrebno za začetek delovanja SIS II, lahko opravili aprila 2008, temu pa bi sledil sklep Sveta o določitvi datuma za začetek delovanja SIS II v državah članicah, ki v celoti sodelujejo v SIS 1+.
On the basis of the so-called 'Global SIS II rescheduling document', it is envisaged that the tests necessary for the SIS II to come into operation could take place in April 2008, followed by the Council decision fixing the date on which the SIS II will become operational for Members fully participating in the SIS 1+.
Po tem in po prehodu držav članic, ki so trenutno priključene na SIS 1+, na SIS II, se bodo v sistem vključile novih držav članic, pri čemer se ocenjuje, da bo za tehnično povezovanje „novih“ uporabnikov SIS II potrebnih 12 tednov.
Following this and the consequent migration of the Member States currently connected to SIS 1+ to SIS II, the new Member States will be integrated, whereby the time period needed for the technical integration of the 'new' SIS II users has been estimated at 12 weeks.
Poročevalec ne dvomi v to, da je treba zaradi vseh nastalih zamud podaljšati mandat Komisije, in hkrati poudarja, da prošnja za podaljšanje mandata do konca leta 2007 ni v skladu z zgoraj opisanim načrtovanjem, ki kaže, da tehnični razvoj SIS II ne bo dokončan v letu 2007.
He stresses with some surprise, however, that the request for the mandate to be prolonged until the end of 2007 is not consistent with the planning set out above, which indicates that the technical development of the SIS II will not be finalised in the course of 2007.
Podatki, ki krožijo v različnih državah članicah in so bili posredovani poročevalcu, kažejo, da bi bila zamuda lahko bistveno daljša, kot trenutno priznavata Komisija in Svet.
Information circulating in various Member States, which has been passed on to the rapporteur, suggests that the delay may well be longer than is currently acknowledged by the Commission and Council.