natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To besedilo je bilo vzeto dobesedno iz skupnega stališča o zakonodaji REACH z dodanim posebnim sklicem na člen 16, v okviru katerega se sankcijam pripisuje poseben pomen.
The wording here has been taken verbatim from the common position on REACH, with the addition of a specific reference to Article 16 for which sanctions are of particular relevance.
Člen 36, odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 36, paragraph 2 a (new)
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporabljata člen 5a(1) do(4) in člen 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a (1) to (4) and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply.
Predlog spremembe je potreben, da bi besedilo uskladili z določbami iz novega sklepa o "komitologiji" in zlasti da bi vključili postopek "regulativnega odbora z nadzorom", ker so nekateri zadevni ukrepi ukrepi splošnega obsega, namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih prvin zakonodajnega osnutka.
The amendment is needed to align the text to the provisions of the new 'commitology' Decision, and in particular to include the 'regulatory committee with scrutiny', since some the measures concerned are measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of the draft legislation.
Člen 36, odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 36, paragraph 3 a (new)
Pri sprejemanju ukrepov v skladu s tem členom Komisija:
When adopting measures in accordance with this Article, the Commission shall:
(a) opravi ustrezna posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi;
(a) carry out appropriate consultation with stakeholders;
(b) pripravi jasen časovni načrt;
(b) provide a clear timetable;
(c) zagotovi skladnost postopkovnih pravil za vse postopke komitologije, ki jih predvideva ta direktiva;
(c) ensure the harmonisation of the rules of procedure for all commitology processes provided for in this Directive;
(d) zagotovi izvršljivost postopka;
(d) ensure the enforceability of the procedure;
(e) zagotovi dostop javnosti do postopkovnih dokumentov;
(e) ensure public access to procedural documents;
(f) po potrebi opravi študijo o vplivu predvidenega ukrepa na okolje in trg.
(f) if necessary, conduct an environmental and market impact study of the planned measure.
Navezovanje na poročevalkin predlog spremembe 35, ki mu je dodana zahteva za izvedbo študije vpliva, če bi bilo to potrebno.
Reinstates amendment 35 by the rapporteur, with the addition of the requirement for an impact assessment if necessary.
Člen 36 a (novo)
Article 36 a (new)
Posvetovalni forum za ravnanje z odpadki
Waste Management Consultation Forum
Komisija ustanovi posvetovalni forum za ravnanje z odpadki.
The Commission shall set up a Consultation Forum on waste management.
Naloga tega foruma je, da za Komisijo na njeno zahtevo ali na lastno pobudo pridobiva mnenja
The task of the Consultation Forum shall be to supply the Commission with opinions, either at the request of the Commission or on its own initiative:
(a) o oblikovanju politike ravnanja z odpadki, ob upoštevanju potrebe po zagotavljanju kar najboljše uporaba virov, preprečevanju nastajanja odpadkov in okolju prijaznega ravnanja z odpadki;
(a) on the formulation of a policy on waste management, having regard to the need to ensure the best use of resources, the prevention of waste generation and the environmentally sound management of waste;
(b) o različnih tehničnih, gospodarskih, upravnih in pravnih vidikih ravnanja z odpadki;
(b) the different technical, economic, administrative and legal aspects concerning waste management;
(c) o izvajanju zakonodaje ES na področju ravnanja z odpadki, vključno z načrti, programi in poročanjem o napredku, ter o oblikovanju novih zakonodajnih predlogov na tem področju.
(c) the implementation of Community legislation on waste management including plans, programmes and reporting on progress, and the formulation of fresh proposals for legislation in this area.
Posvetovalni forum v uravnoteženem razmerju sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic in vse zainteresirane skupine, ki se ukvarjajo z vprašanji ravnanja z odpadki, kot so industrija, vključno z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji ter obrtnimi podjetji, sindikalne organizacije, trgovci, posredniki, okoljevarstvene skupine in potrošniške organizacije.
The Consultation Forum shall be composed, in a balanced way, of Member States' representatives and all interested groups concerned with waste management issues, such as industry, including SMEs and craft industry, trade unions, traders, retailers, environmental protection groups and consumer organisations.
Posvetovalni forum se sestane vsaj trikrat na leto.
The Consultation Forum shall meet at least three times a year.
Skliče ga Komisija.
It shall be convened by the Commission.
Komisija predseduje sestankom.
The Commission shall chair the meetings.
Po potrebi se skličejo ad hoc delovne skupine, ki se srečujejo bolj pogosto.
If appropriate, ad hoc working groups may be convened and meet more frequently.
Komisija sprejme interni poslovnik za posvetovalni forum.
The Commission shall adopt the internal rules of the Consultation Forum.
Zelo pomembno je, da se za namene izvajanja direktive ustanovi ustrezen forum, kot je bilo to storjeno na drugih področjih okoljske politike, na primer na področju zraka in vode.
It is crucial to establish a proper Forum for the purposes of implementing the Directive, as has been done in other environmental policy fields such as Air and Water.
Ta forum na ravni EU, ki je v bistvu posvetovalni odbor za ravnanje z odpadki in izvajanje sprejetih smernic, bi moral vključevati pristojne organe držav članic in zainteresirane strani, služiti pa bi moral tudi posebnim nalogam nadzora ter kolikor je mogoče in primerno sodelovati pri razvoju izvedbenih ukrepov.
This EU level forum, essentially a Waste Management and Implementation Consultation Committee, should include both Member State competent bodies and stakeholders and should be used also for specific duties of scrutiny and to participate in the development of implementing measures as far as possible and relevant.
Priloga I, točka D 7
Annex I, point D 7
D 7 izpuščanje v morja/oceane, vključno z odlaganjem na morsko dno;
D 7 Release into seas/oceans including sea-bed insertion
Izpuščanje ali odlaganje odpadkov v morje bi moralo biti prepovedano, saj je dolgoročno nevarno.
Releasing or dumping of waste into the sea should be prohibited because it is unsafe in the long term.
Priloga I, točka D 11
Annex I, point D 11
D11 sežiganje na morju;
D11 Incineration at sea
Sežiganje na morju je prepovedano od 7. oktobra 1997 dalje, torej dne, ko je Evropska skupnost postala podpisnica Konvencije OSPAR..
The OSPAR Convention bans incineration at sea from the date that the European Community became a signatory to it – 7 October 1997.
Priloga II, točka R 1
Annex II, point R1
R1 Uporaba predvsem kot gorivo ali druga sredstva za pridobivanje energije.
R1 Use principally as a fuel or other means to generate energy.
R1 uporaba predvsem kot gorivo ali druga sredstva za pridobivanje energije.
R1 Use principally as a fuel or other means to generate energy.
To vključuje sežigalne naprave za predelavo trdnih komunalnih odpadkov samo kadar je njihova energetska učinkovitost enaka ali večja od:
This includes incineration facilities dedicated to the processing of municipal solid waste only where their energy efficiency is equal to or above:
0,60 za obrate, ki delujejo in imajo dovoljenje v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo Skupnosti, veljavno pred 1. januarjem 2009,
– 0.60 for installations in operation and permitted in accordance with applicable Community legislation before 1 January 2009,
– 0,65 za obrate z dovoljenjem po 31. decembru 2008,
– 0.65 for installations permitted after 31 December 2008,
Energetska učinkovitost = (Ep -( Ef + Ei)) / (0.97 x (Ew + Ef))
Energy efficiency .= (Ep -( Ef + Ei)) / (0.97 x (Ew + Ef))
Predlog Komisije, po katerem naj bi sežigalne naprave za komunalne odpadke prerazporedili glede na njihovo energetsko učinkovitost, ne priznava, da bi morali obrati, namenjeni obdelavi mešanih odpadkov spremenljive in nepredvidljive sestave, najprej poskrbeti za ustrezno ekološko ravnanje z njimi (mineralizacijo) in nadzor nad emisijami.
The Commissions proposal to reclassify municipal waste incinerators based on their energy efficiency does not recognise that installations dedicated to handling mixed wastes with a variable and unpredictable composition should be primarily concerned with the proper environmental treatment (mineralisation) of that waste and controlling emissions.
Ponovna pridobitev energije (in toplote) bi morala biti drugotnega pomena.
Energy (and heat) recuperation should remain a secondary consideration.
Formula energetske učinkovitosti kot edino merilo za sežigalne obrate za trdne komunalne odpadke, opredeljene kot predelovalne obrate, ni v skladu z več meril upoštevajočim pristopom k opredelitvi predelave in primarno skrbjo za nadzor nad emisijami.
The energy efficiency formula as the sole criteria for municipal solid waste incineration plants being classified as recovery is not coherent with the multi-criteria approach to the definition of recovery and the primary environmental concern of controlling emissions.
R 9a. druge dejavnosti predelave za proizvodnjo sekundarnih izdelkov, surovin in snovi;
Other recovery activities for the production of secondary products, materials and substances
Namen spremembe je pojasniti primere, v katerih je predelava sestavljena iz več zaporednih korakov.
The amendment aims in clarifying the situation where recovery constitutes of several consecutive steps.
Predelovalna veriga, ki vključuje več podjetij, ni v Evropi nič nenavadnega.
Such recovery chain of several industries is usual in Europe.
Priloga II, točka R 11 a (novo)
Annex II, point R 11 a (new)
R 11 uporaba odpadkov, pridobljenih s katerim koli postopkom, naštetim pod R1 do R10;
R 11 Use of wastes obtained from any of the operations numbered R 1 to R 10
R 11 pridobivanje energije iz odlagališčnega plina
R 11 Recovery of energy from landfill gas
S pretvorbo odlagališčnega plina v energijo so lahko sodobna odlagališča učinkoviti biološki pretvorniki.
Modern engineered landfills can be effective bio-generators through the conversion of landfill gas to energy.
Izboljšanje te oblike pridobivanja energije bi morali spodbujati z njenim priznanjem v tej direktivi.
Optimisation of this form of energy recovery should be encouraged through recognition in the Directive.
Medtem ko lahko s sodobnimi tehnologijami sežiganja dosežemo večino ciljev ravnanja s plini, na primer omejimo vonjave, uničimo strupene sestavine in dosegamo nizke vrednosti emisij onesnaževal, prinaša pretvorba odlagališčnega plina v energijo dodatno prednost, s tem ko nadomešča neobnovljiva fosilna goriva, ki bi jih sicer uporabljali drugje za pridobivanje iste količine energije.
Whereas modern flare technologies can achieve most of the objectives of gas management such as odour control, destruction of toxic constituents and low pollutant emissions, landfill gas to energy provides the additional benefit of displacing non-renewable fossil fuels that would be used to generate the same of amount of energy elsewhere.
R 11a. uporaba odpadkov za gradnjo, tehnične, varnostne ali ekološke namene, za kar bi sicer uporabili druge surovine;
Use of wastes for construction, technical, safety or ecological purposes for which other materials would otherwise have been used
Zaradi spodbujanja trajnostne uporabe virov je treba posodobiti seznam postopkov predelave iz Priloge II b, pri čemer se upoštevata sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča in tehnični razvoj.
In order to promote the sustainable use of resources, the list of recovery operations contained in Annex II B should be updated, taking account of Court of Justice case law and technical developments.
Priloga II, točka R 13 a (novo)
Annex II, point R 13 a (new)
Namen predloga spremembe je pojasniti primere, v katerih je predelava sestavljena iz več zaporednih korakov in se na primer recikliranje zaključi po (vmesnih) postopkih predelave, v katerih je bil pravni status odpadkov že spremenjen.
The amendment aims at clarifying the situation where recovery is made up of several consecutive steps and for example the recycling is completed after (intermediate) recovery operations where the legal waste status has already been changed.
Priloga II, točka R 13 b (novo)
Annex II, point R 13 b (new)
Predlog spremembe je povezan z delom predloga spremembe istih avtoric k uvodni izjavi 11 .
Linked to part of an amendment by the same authors to Recital 11.
Ponovna uporaba proizvodov ali sestavnih delov se razlikuje od pridobivanja nekaterih surovin, kar bi moralo biti jasno navedeno v prilogi o postopkih predelave.
Re-use of products or components is different from the reclamation of certain materials and should be listed explicitly in the Annex on recovery operations.
Iz tega razloga je treba dodati točko v Prilogi II.
As such an additional entry is needed in Annex II.
Vrste uporabe, pri katerih se lahko odpadki uporabljajo kot sekundarni proizvodi, surovine ali snovi
Applications for which wastes can be used as a secondary product, material or substance
- uporaba v gnojilih ali kot gnojilo ali kot snov za izboljšanje prsti
- Use in or as a fertiliser or as a soil-improving substance
- uporaba v gradbenem materialu ali kot gradbeni material,
- Use in or as a building material,
- uporaba kot prst
- Use as soil
Predlog spremembe je povezan s predlogom spremembe člena 11, "sekundarni proizvodi, surovine in snovi se uporabljajo v enega od namenov iz Priloge IIa".
Amendment is linked with amendment to Article 11, 'the secondary products, materials and substances are to be used in one of the applications listed in annex IIa'.
Priloga III, točki H 13 in H 14
Annex III, points H13 and H14
H13 Snovi in pripravki, sposobne , da s kakršnimi koli sredstvi po odstranitvi tvorijo drugo snov, npr. lug, ki ima katero koli lastnost, navedeno zgoraj .
H13 Substances and preparations capable by any means, after disposal, of yielding another substance, e.g. a leachate, which possesses any of the characteristics listed above.
H14 Snovi in pripravki, ki lahko s kakršnimi koli sredstvi po odstranitvi tvorijo drugo snov, npr. lug, ki ima katero koli od zgoraj navedenih lastnosti .
H14 Substances and preparations capable by any means, after disposal, of yielding another substance, e.g. a leachate, which possesses any of the other characteristics listed above.
H14 „Ekotoksične snovi“: snovi in pripravki, ki predstavljajo ali lahko predstavljajo takojšnje ali kasnejše tveganje za enega ali več sektorjev okolja.
H14 ‘Ecotoxic’: substances and preparations which present or may present immediate or delayed risks for one or more sectors of the environment.
H13 „Ekotoksične snovi“: snovi in pripravki, ki predstavljajo ali lahko predstavljajo takojšnje ali kasnejše tveganje za enega ali več sektorjev okolja.
H13 ‘Ecotoxic’: substances and preparations which present or may present immediate or delayed risks for one or more sectors of the environment.
Ta predlog spremembe je potreben, da se vrstni red na seznamu lastnosti, zaradi katerih so odpadki strupeni, uskladi z mednarodnimi predpisi, zlasti Baselsko konvencijo.
This amendment is necessary to align the order of the list of properties of wastes which render them hazardous with international law, notably the Basel Convention.
Merilo H13 je zelo pomembno, saj vključuje nevarne lastnosti, ki se pojavijo po odlaganju odpadkov.
The criterion H 13 is very important, as it includes hazardous properties that occur after disposal.
Ker se merilo H13 nanaša na „katero koli zgoraj navedeno lastnost", „ekotoksična" lastnost v sedanjem zaporedju ni upoštevana.
As the criterion H13 refers to any of the characteristics listed ' above ', in the current order, the property 'ecotoxic' is excluded from consideration.
V skladu z Baselsko konvencijo je treba vrstni red spremeniti, zato da bo „ekotoksičnost" upoštevana tudi po odlaganju, na primer v lugu.
In line with the Basel Convention, the order should be inverted so that the property ' ecotoxic' is also considered after disposal, e.g. in a leachate.
Priloga IV, točka 3 a (novo)
Annex IV, point 3 a (new)
Države članice Komisiji sporočijo, kateri proizvodi so primerni za primerjave proizvodov na ravni EU, pri katerih se glavna pozornost namenja preprečevanju nastajanja odpadkov.
Member States shall notify the Commission of products which are eligible for EU-wide product comparisons, with prevention of waste as the central concern.
Če bodo proizvajalci/uvozniki tržili surovine, ki so za okolje najmanj škodljivi, bo to veliko prispevalo k ciljem te direktive.
If manufacturers/importers market the least environmentally damaging materials, this will make a significant contribution to the objective of this directive.
Pri izbiri bi proizvajalci/uvozniki morali upoštevati kazalce, ki predstavljajo škodo za okolje, povzročeno z različnimi surovinami.
The choices made by manufacturers/importers should be inspired by indicators which represent the environmental damage caused by various materials.
Priloga IV, točka 3 b (novo)
Annex IV, point 3 b (new)
Določitev meril upravičenosti držav članic EU in tretjih držav do sredstev za projekte iz strukturnih in regionalnih skladov zaradi dajanja prednosti preprečevanju nastajanja odpadkov, zlasti pa uporabi najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij in meril za čistejšo proizvodnjo.
The specification of criteria for eligibility of both EU and non-EU countries for Structural and Regional funding of projects in order to give priority to waste prevention – in particular the use of BAT and cleaner production benchmarks.
Priloga IV, točka 3 c (novo)
Annex IV, point 3 c (new)
Države članice morajo spodbujati k sistemom ločenega zbiranja odpadkov, da se bodo gospodinjski odpadki zbirali v skladu s standardi kakovosti posameznih sektorjev.
Encouragement by Member States of selective collection systems, with a view to ensuring that domestic waste is collected in compliance with the quality standards in the relevant sectors.
Priloga IV, podnaslov 2
Annex IV, subtitle 2
Ukrepi, ki lahko vplivajo na fazi oblikovanja in proizvodnje
Measures that can affect the design and production phase
Ukrepi, ki lahko vplivajo na faze oblikovanja , proizvodnje in distribucije
Measures that can affect the design, production and distribution phase
Med pomembnimi udeleženci ne smemo prezreti distributerjev.
Distributors should not be forgotten as an important actor.
Vedenje potrošnikov je pomembna točka, ki jo je treba upoštevati v programih preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov.
Consumer behaviour is important issue to be tackled in the prevention programs.
Priloga IV, točka 7
Annex IV, point 7
Vključitev ukrepov za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov v obratih ne spada pod Direktivo 96/61/ES.
The inclusion of measures to prevent waste production at installations not falling under Directive 96/61/EC.
Kadar je primerno, lahko takšni ukrepi vključujejo ocene ali načrte preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov.
Where appropriate, such measures could include waste prevention assessments or plans.
Takšni ukrepi vključujejo ocene ali načrte preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov.
Such measures could include waste prevention assessments or plans.
Glej obrazložitev k Prilogi IV, podnaslov 2.
See justification to Annex IV, subtitle 2.
Priloga IV, točka 9
Annex IV, point 9
Uporaba prostovoljnih dogovorov, svetov potrošnikov/proizvajalcev ali sektorskih pogajanj zato, da ustrezne dejavnosti ali industrijski sektorji določijo svoje lastne načrte za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov ali cilje oziroma da popravijo odpadne proizvode ali način embaliranja.
The use of voluntary agreements, consumer/producer panels or sectoral negotiations in order that the relevant businesses or industrial sectors set their own waste prevention plans or objectives or correct wasteful products or packaging.
Uporaba zakonodaje, prostovoljnih dogovorov, svetov potrošnikov/proizvajalcev ali sektorskih pogajanj zato, da ustrezne dejavnosti ali industrijski sektorji določijo svoje lastne načrte za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov ali cilje oziroma da popravijo odpadne proizvode ali način embaliranja.
The use of legislation, voluntary agreements, consumer/producer panels or sectoral negotiations in order that the relevant businesses or industrial sectors set their own waste prevention plans or objectives or correct wasteful products or packaging.
Glej obrazložitev k Prilogi IV, podnaslov 2.
see justification to Annex IV, subtitle 2.
Priloga IV, točka 11
Annex IV, point 11
Ekonomski instrumenti, kakršni so pobude za čiste nakupe ali ustanove, v katerih morajo porabniki obvezno plačati za dani izdelek ali embalažo, ki bi bila sicer zagotovljena zastonj.
Economic instruments such as incentives for clean purchases or the institution of an obligatory payment by consumers for a given article or element of packaging that would otherwise be provided free of charge.
Ekonomski instrumenti, kakršni so pobude za čiste nakupe ali ustanove, v katerih morajo porabniki obvezno plačati za dani izdelek ali embalažo, ki bi bila sicer zagotovljena zastonj ali po nižji ceni .
Economic instruments such as incentives for clean purchases or the institution of an obligatory payment by consumers for a given article or element of packaging that would otherwise be provided free of charge or at a lower price.
S pričujočo direktivo se nadaljuje razprava, ki se je začela s prvimi direktivami EU o odpadkih v sedemdesetih letih in ji je bilo namenjeno več pozornosti v direktivi o odlagališčih iz leta 1999.
This Directive carries forward the debate begun by the first EU Waste Directives in the 1970s and given greater focus by the Landfill Directive of 1999.
Vprašanja, ki si jih zastavljamo sedaj, so, kako zmanjšati količino odpadkov, ki jih proizvajamo ob naraščajoči blaginji, in kako spremeniti naše ravnanje z odpadki na način, da z odpadki ne bi ravnali kot z nečim, kar je le za odlagališče, temveč kot z virom, iz katerega je mogoče kaj pridobiti.
The questions for our times are how do we reduce the amount of waste that our increasing prosperity encourages us produce, and how do we now need to change our policies so that we deal with waste primarily as a resource from which value can be extracted, rather than as a residue that can only be stored in a landfill.
Glede na veliko število primerov Sodišča, ki so bili povezani s tolmačenjem zakonodaje EU o odpadkih, moramo najprej zagotoviti, da bo zakon, kakršenkoli že bo na koncu sprejet, prinesel gotovost glede opredelitev in ciljev politike.
Given the number of Court of Justice cases that have arisen on the interpretation of EU waste law to date, the first thing we should try to ensure is that whatever law we finally adopt establishes certainty - about definitions and policy intentions.
Zato je odbor predlagal številne dodatke k členu 3, kjer naj bi združili opredelitve, ki se pojavljajo drugje v direktivi.
This is why the committee has suggested a number of additions to Article 3 and a consolidation there of definitions appearing elsewhere in the Directive.
Poročevalka je bila večkrat pozvana, naj poudari potrebo po tem, da se v direktivi omeni hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki v najbolj celoviti, petstopenjski obliki.
The rapporteur has received many representations about the need for the Directive to contain a reference to the waste hierarchy in its fullest - 5 stage - form.
Ob tem je popolnoma jasno, da je potrebno dopustiti odstopanje od direktive, kadar okoliščine to zahtevajo.
It is, however, immediately clear that allowance must be made for departures from the hierarchy when conditions demand it.
Postavlja pa se vprašanje, kdaj je to potrebno.
The question is: what conditions?
Predlogi odbora so vsebovani v zadnjem delu predloga spremembe k členu 1.
The committee's suggestions are contained in the last part of the amendment to Article 1.
Kot kaže, obstaja soglasje, da morajo biti odstopanja zasnovana na upoštevanju/analizi/oceni življenjskega cikla in da je treba ob tem izvesti tudi analizo stroškov.
There seems to be a consensus that departures should be based on life-cycle thinking/analysis/assessment, and a cost-benefit analysis has to fit in there somewhere.