natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
„(7a) Zaradi pomembnosti vzpostavitve učinkovite in enotne zaščite eura pred ponarejanjem zunaj Evropske skupnosti je treba državam kandidatkam omogočiti dostop do programa.
‘(7a) In view of the importance of establishing effective and uniform protection of the euro against counterfeiting outside the European Community, the programme needs to be made accessible to candidate countries.
Podobno se lahko upošteva tudi možnost, da bi v programu sodelovale druge tretje države.“
Similarly, the participation of other third countries in the programme may also be considered.’.
It is important for candidate countries to be able to take part in the programme because they will shortly be Member States of the European Union and must combat euro counterfeiting, especially if it is taking place in their territory.
It is important for candidate countries to be able to take part in the programme because they will shortly be Member States of the European Union and must combat euro counterfeiting, especially if it is taking place in their territory.
In addition, the programme must also provide for the representatives of third countries to take part in some of the relevant projects and actions, as the euro is one of the currencies at greatest risk of counterfeiting on a world level, and is frequently used as a currency for international transactions.
In addition, the programme must also provide for the representatives of third countries to take part in some of the relevant projects and actions, as the euro is one of the currencies at greatest risk of counterfeiting on a world level, and is frequently used as a currency for international transactions.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA -1 B (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT -1 B (new)
Uvodna izjava 8 a (novo) (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Recital 8 a (new) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
Vstavi se naslednja uvodna izjava 8a:
The following recital 8a shall be inserted:
„(8a) Zagotoviti je treba reden nadzor in ocenjevanje programa, da se lahko glede na cilje oceni učinkovitost izpeljanih projektov in ukrepov ter se lahko opravijo ustrezne prilagoditve, vključno s presojo, ali naj se s programom nadaljuje.“
‘(8a) Regular monitoring and evaluation of the programme need to be ensured so that the effectiveness of the projects and actions carried out can be assessed in the light of the objectives, and any appropriate adjustments can be made, including judging whether the programme should be continued.’.
Continued evaluation with a view to ironing out any disparities that may occur is a way of ensuring that the programme’s objectives are achieved.
Continued evaluation with a view to ironing out any disparities that may occur is a way of ensuring that the programme’s objectives are achieved.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA -1 C (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT -1 C (new)
Uvodna izjava 8 b (novo) (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Recital 8 b (new) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
Vstavi se naslednja uvodna izjava 8b:
The following recital 8b shall be inserted:
„(8b) Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje tega Sklepa, je treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil 1 .
‘(8b) The measures necessary to implement this Decision should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission 1 .
Article 202 of the EC Treaty stipulates that the Council shall ‘confer on the Commission, in the acts which the Council adopts, powers for the implementation of the rules which the Council lays down’.
Article 202 of the EC Treaty stipulates that the Council shall ‘confer on the Commission, in the acts which the Council adopts, powers for the implementation of the rules which the Council lays down’.
The arrangements for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission are governed by Council Decision 1999/468/EC, which lays down the procedures involved.
The arrangements for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission are governed by Council Decision 1999/468/EC, which lays down the procedures involved.
Člen 1, odstavek 2 (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 1, paragraph 2 (Decision 2001/923/EC)
„Program se izvaja v dodatnem obdobju od 1. januarja 2006 do 31. decembra 2011 .“
‘The programme shall run for an additional period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2011 .’.
„Program se izvaja v dodatnem obdobju od 1. januarja 2006 do 31. decembra 2013 .“
‘The programme shall run for an additional period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2013 .’.
See amendment to recital 4.
See amendment to recital 4.
Člen 2, odstavek 2, točka (d a) (novo) (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 2, paragraph 2, point (d a) (new) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
V členu 2(2) se doda naslednja točka (da):
In Article 2(2), the following point (d a) shall be added:
„(da) cilj objave doseženih rezultatov kot del izmenjave informacij, izkušenj in dobrih praks.“
‘(da) an aim of publicising the results achieved, as part of the exchange of information, experience and good practices.’.
It is important for the results of the projects and actions to be publicised to boost the multiplier effect involved.
It is important for the results of the projects and actions to be publicised to boost the multiplier effect involved.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 B (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 B (new)
Člen 3, odstavek 2, pododstavek 2 (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 3, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 (Decision 2001/923/EC)
Drugi pododstavek člena 3(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The second subparagraph of Article 3(2) shall be replaced by the following:
„Taka izmenjava informacij se lahko odraža v različnih ukrepih, kot so organizacija delavnic, srečanj strokovnjakov, konferenc, srečanj in seminarjev ter ciljna politika nastavitve in izmenjave osebja.“
‘Such exchanges of information may be reflected in a variety of measures such as the organisation of workshops, expert meetings, conferences, meetings and seminars, and a targeted policy of placements and exchanges of staff.’.
(Enako besedilo kot v Sklepu 2001/923/ES, z vključitvijo "srečanj strokovnjakov, konferenc".)
(Same text as Decision 2001/923/EC, with the insertion of ‘expert meetings, conferences’.)
Information exchange must also be carried out on a specific basis via meetings of experts in the field and via conferences.
Information exchange must also be carried out on a specific basis via meetings of experts in the field and via conferences.
Člen 6, pododstavek 1 (sklep 2001/923/CE)
Article 6, first paragraph (Decision 2001/923/EC)
Referenčna finančna vsota za izvedbo akcijskega programa Skupnosti v obdobju iz člena 1(2) je s tem določena na 6 milijonov EUR.
The financial reference amount for the implementation of the Community programme of action for the period referred to in Article 1(2) last sentence shall be EUR 6 million.
Referenčna finančna vsota za izvedbo akcijskega programa Skupnosti v obdobju iz člena 1(2) je s tem določena na 8,8 milijonov EUR.
The financial reference amount for the implementation of the Community programme of action for the period referred to in Article 1(2) last sentence shall be EUR 8.8 million.
S podaljšanjem programa s šestih na osem let je treba proračun najprej zvišati za 2 milijona EUR.
Firstly, increasing the extension of the programme from 6 to 8 years entails an increase in the budget of 2 million euro.
Člen 6, odstavek 2 a (novo) (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 6, paragraph 2 a (new) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
V členu 6 se doda naslednji odstavek 2a:
In Article 6, the following paragraph 2 a shall be added:
„ Sklepe o financiranju finančno nadzira Komisija in revidira Računsko sodišče. “
‘Financing decisions shall be subject to financial control by the Commission and to audits by the Court of Auditors.’.
Decisions involving expenditure must be subject to financial control, initially in the form of internal, ‘ex ante’ control by the Commission itself, and then in the form of an ‘ex post’ audit by the Court of Auditors of the European Union.
Decisions involving expenditure must be subject to financial control, initially in the form of internal, ‘ex ante’ control by the Commission itself, and then in the form of an ‘ex post’ audit by the Court of Auditors of the European Union.
Člen 10, odstavek 1, uvodni del (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 10, paragraph 1, introductory part (Decision 2001/923/EC)
„Skupnost krije do 80 % stroškov operativne podpore iz člena 3(2) v obliki sofinanciranja, zlasti:“
‘The Community shall bear up to 80% of the cost of the operational support referred to in Article 3(2) by way of co-financing, in particular:’.
„Skupnost krije do 70 % – delež se lahko v posebnih okoliščinah dvigne na 90 % – stroškov operativne podpore iz člena 3(2) v obliki sofinanciranja, zlasti:“
‘The Community shall bear up to 70% – which may be increased to 90% in exceptional circumstances – of the cost of the operational support referred to in Article 3(2) by way of co-financing, in particular:’.
Community funding for projects to the tune of up to 70% is generally considered to be sufficient.
Community funding for projects to the tune of up to 70% is generally considered to be sufficient.
However, exceptional cases can occur in which organisers in the countries concerned are unable to provide the remaining 30%.
However, exceptional cases can occur in which organisers in the countries concerned are unable to provide the remaining 30%.
In such cases, it must be possible for the Community to bear up to 90% of the cost.
In such cases, it must be possible for the Community to bear up to 90% of the cost.
Člen 11 (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 11 (Decision 2001/923/EC)
V členu 11 se referenčni odstotek 70 % nadomesti z „80 %“ .
In Article 11 the reference to the percentage 70% is replaced by ‘80%’ .
V členu 11 se referenčni odstotek 70 % nadomesti s „70 %“ – delež se lahko v posebnih okoliščinah poviša na 90 %“ .
In Article 11 the reference to the percentage 70% is replaced by ‘70% – which may be increased to 90% in exceptional circumstances – ’ .
See amendment to Article 1, point 4 (mutatis mutandis).
See amendment to Article 1, point 4 (mutatis mutandis).
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7 A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 7 A (new)
Člen 12, odstavek 2, točka (a a) (novo) (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 12, paragraph 2, point (a a) (new) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
V členu 12(2) se vstavi naslednja točka (aa):
In Article 12(2), the following point (a a) is inserted:
„(aa) združljivost z delom, ki se izvaja ali načrtuje kot del ukrepov EU na področju boja proti ponarejanju valute;“
‘(aa) compatibility with work being carried out or planned as part of EU action in the field of combating currency counterfeiting;’.
To avoid overlap and optimise results, the suitability of a project should be cross-checked against the relevant policy priorities and work already being carried out or planned.
To avoid overlap and optimise results, the suitability of a project should be cross-checked against the relevant policy priorities and work already being carried out or planned.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7 B (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 7 B (new)
Člen 12, odstavek 2, točka (e) (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 12, paragraph 2, point (e) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
Člen 12(2)(e) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 12(2)(e) shall be replaced by the following:
„(e) vsebinska kakovost projekta v smislu zasnove, organizacije, predstavitve in ciljev, ter razmerja med stroški in dosežki projekta;“
‘(e) the intrinsic quality of the project in terms of its conception, organisation, presentation, objectives and cost-effectiveness ratio;’.
(Enako besedilo kot v Sklepu 2001/923/ES, z vključitvijo „ v smislu zasnove, organizacije, predstavitve in ciljev “.)
(Same text as Decision 2001/923/EC, with the insertion of ‘in terms of its conception, organisation, presentation, objectives’.)
It is a good idea to point out exactly which parameters are seen as most important when it comes to assessing the quality of a project.
It is a good idea to point out exactly which parameters are seen as most important when it comes to assessing the quality of a project.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7 C (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 7 C (new)
Člen 12, odstavek 3 (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 12, paragraph 3 (Decision 2001/923/EC)
Člen 12(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 12(3) shall be replaced by the following:
Komisija je odgovorna za upravljanje in izvajanje programa v sodelovanju z državami članicami v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti 1 .
The Commission shall be responsible for managing and implementing the programme in cooperation with the Member States, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities 1 .
The Commission must manage and implement the programme in accordance with the estimates in respect of the Financial Regulation.
The Commission must manage and implement the programme in accordance with the estimates in respect of the Financial Regulation.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7 D (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 7 D (new)
Člen 12 a (novo) (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 12 a (new) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
Vstavi se naslednji člen 12a:
The following Article 12a is inserted:
„Člen 12a
‘Article 12a
Komisiji pomaga svetovalni odbor, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic, predseduje pa mu predstavnik Komisije, v nadaljnjem besedilu „odbor“.
The Commission shall be assisted by an advisory committee composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Pericles Committee’.
Odbor Pericles sprejme svoj poslovnik na predlog svojega predsednika in v skladu s členoma 3 in 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
The Pericles Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure on a proposal by its chairman and in accordance with Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Komisija lahko predstavnike držav kandidatk ali tretjih držav povabi na informativne sestanke po sejah Odbora Pericles.“
The Commission may invite representatives from the candidate countries or third countries to information meetings after Pericles Committee meetings.’.
See amendment to Article 1, point -1c (new).
See amendment to Article 1, point -1c (new).
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7 E (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 7 E (new)
Člen 13, odstavek 3, točka (-a) (novo) (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 13, paragraph 3, point (-a) (new) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
„(-a) letno poročilo o izvajanju programa Pericles.
‘(-a) an annual report on the implementation of the Pericles programme.
Poročilo se pošlje v prvi polovici leta, ki sledi obravnavanemu letu, skupaj s seznamom financiranih projektov in ukrepov;“
The report shall be sent during the first half of the year following the year under review, and shall be accompanied by the list of projects and actions being funded;’.
Both the Council and Parliament must be informed on a yearly basis as to programme’s progress.
Both the Council and Parliament must be informed on a yearly basis as to programme’s progress.
Člen 13, odstavek 3, točka (a) (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 13, paragraph 3, point (a) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
V točki (a) člena 13(3) se referenčni datum „30. junij 2005“ nadomesti s „ 30. junij 2011 “.
In Article 13(3) point (a) the reference to the date ‘30 June 2005’ is replaced by ‘30 June 2011 ’.
V točki (a) člena 13(3) se referenčni datum „30. junij 2005“ nadomesti s „ 30. junij 2013 “.
In Article 13(3) point (a) the reference to the date ‘30 June 2005’ is replaced by ‘30 June 2013 ’.
Brings the text into line with the amendment to recital 4.
Brings the text into line with the amendment to recital 4.
Člen 13, odstavek 3, točka b (Sklep 2001/923/ES)
Article 13, paragraph 3, point (b) (Decision 2001/923/EC)
ob zaključku dveh obdobij programa, začetnega in dodatnega , in najkasneje do 30. junija 2006 oziroma 2012 pripraviti podrobno poročilo o izvedbi in rezultatih programa, ki opredeljuje zlasti dodano vrednost finančne pomoči Skupnosti.
on completion of the initial and the additional periods of the programme and no later than 30 June 2006 and 2012 respectively, detailed reports on the implementation and the results of the programme setting out in particular the added value of the Community’s financial assistance
ob zaključku prvega, začetnega obdobja programa, na sredini in ob koncu dodatnega obdobja in najkasneje do 30. junija 2006, 2010 oziroma 2014 pripraviti podrobno poročilo o izvedbi in rezultatih programa, ki opredeljuje zlasti dodano vrednost finančne pomoči Skupnosti.
' on completion of the first, initial period, at mid-term and on completion of the additional period of the programme and no later than 30 June 2006 , 2010 and 2014 respectively, detailed reports on the implementation and the results of the programme setting out in particular the added value of the Community’s financial assistance .’.
Ocena na sredini in ob zaključku programa bo zagotovila boljši nadzor, preglednost in učinkovitost njegovega izvajanja in spremljanja, ter omogočila, da se na sredini njegovega odvijanja preuči dodatne potrebe, dosežke in pomanjkljivosti.
An evaluation at mid-term and on completion of the programme will, on the one hand, improve scrutiny, transparency and effectiveness in the implementation and monitoring of the programme and, on the other, enable an assessment to be made at mid-term of needs, successes and failings.
The role played by the euro on the world stage since its creation means it can only be protected against counterfeiting by establishing a comprehensive, consistent and effective mechanism.
The role played by the euro on the world stage since its creation means it can only be protected against counterfeiting by establishing a comprehensive, consistent and effective mechanism.
The euro is the single currency in 12 EU Member States, and none of them individually can adopt effective mechanisms to prevent its counterfeiting.
The euro is the single currency in 12 EU Member States, and none of them individually can adopt effective mechanisms to prevent its counterfeiting.
That is why all the institutions, bodies and Member States of the EU, as well as the competent international organisations, must work together to combat fraud in respect of the euro.
That is why all the institutions, bodies and Member States of the EU, as well as the competent international organisations, must work together to combat fraud in respect of the euro.
It has thus been vital for the European Union and the European Community to go about adopting a comprehensive legal framework to put in place the measures needed to ensure an effective, homogeneous mechanism to protect the circulation of euro notes and coins against illegal counterfeiting.
It has thus been vital for the European Union and the European Community to go about adopting a comprehensive legal framework to put in place the measures needed to ensure an effective, homogeneous mechanism to protect the circulation of euro notes and coins against illegal counterfeiting.
II. – THE COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK SET UP BY THE EUROPEAN UNION TO PROTECT THE EURO AGAINST COUNTERFEITING
II. – THE COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK SET UP BY THE EUROPEAN UNION TO PROTECT THE EURO AGAINST COUNTERFEITING
The Commission outlined the broad thrust of the EU’s comprehensive strategy for combating counterfeiting in its communication of 27 July 1998, entitled ‘ Protection of the euro – combating counterfeiting ’, arranging the strategy around the following four elements:
The Commission outlined the broad thrust of the EU’s comprehensive strategy for combating counterfeiting in its communication of 27 July 1998, entitled ‘ Protection of the euro – combating counterfeiting ’, arranging the strategy around the following four elements:
a) Protecting the euro via criminal law
a) Protecting the euro via criminal law
Firstly, one of the key elements is that of a harmonised, EU-wide definition of the offence of currency counterfeiting.
Firstly, one of the key elements is that of a harmonised, EU-wide definition of the offence of currency counterfeiting.
Indeed, a comprehensive, homogeneous legal framework making currency counterfeiting a criminal offence is vital because:
Indeed, a comprehensive, homogeneous legal framework making currency counterfeiting a criminal offence is vital because:
a) at international scale, the only instrument designed to prevent and punish currency counterfeiting is the Geneva Convention of 30 April 1929
a) at international scale, the only instrument designed to prevent and punish currency counterfeiting is the Geneva Convention of 30 April 1929
League of Nations Treaty Series 1931, No 2623, p.
League of Nations Treaty Series 1931, No 2623, p.
372. , which has been ratified by almost all the Member States.
372. , which has been ratified by almost all the Member States.
However, this purely intergovernmental agreement is unable to provide effective protection for the euro since it represents a Community interest and therefore calls for the establishment of mechanisms which are by definition Community ones;
However, this purely intergovernmental agreement is unable to provide effective protection for the euro since it represents a Community interest and therefore calls for the establishment of mechanisms which are by definition Community ones;
b) from a national viewpoint, the Member States have over time adopted anti-counterfeiting legislation that varies enormously from one country to another and that is naturally unable, on its own, to ensure effective action against counterfeiting of the euro, which is the single currency in 12 Member States.
b) from a national viewpoint, the Member States have over time adopted anti-counterfeiting legislation that varies enormously from one country to another and that is naturally unable, on its own, to ensure effective action against counterfeiting of the euro, which is the single currency in 12 Member States.
The criminal law in force in the various Member States differs greatly as regards action to combat counterfeiting, since it is highly developed in certain countries and significantly less so in others.
The criminal law in force in the various Member States differs greatly as regards action to combat counterfeiting, since it is highly developed in certain countries and significantly less so in others.
On account of the shortcomings and deficiencies of international instruments (such as the Geneva Convention) and national legal systems in terms of criminal law, the Council adopted, on 29 May 2000, a framework Decision on increasing protection by criminal penalties and other sanctions against counterfeiting in connection with the introduction of the euro
On account of the shortcomings and deficiencies of international instruments (such as the Geneva Convention) and national legal systems in terms of criminal law, the Council adopted, on 29 May 2000, a framework Decision on increasing protection by criminal penalties and other sanctions against counterfeiting in connection with the introduction of the euro
OJ L 140, 14.6.2000, p.
OJ L 140, 14.6.2000, p.
1. with the aim of establishing equivalent protection throughout the Union.
1. with the aim of establishing equivalent protection throughout the Union.
That framework Decision was supplemented by another, adopted on 6 December 2001, which stipulates that each Member State must recognise sentences handed down in another Member State for the purpose of establishing ‘habitual criminality’.
That framework Decision was supplemented by another, adopted on 6 December 2001, which stipulates that each Member State must recognise sentences handed down in another Member State for the purpose of establishing ‘habitual criminality’.
b) Strengthening cooperation between those involved by establishing a mutual assistance system
b) Strengthening cooperation between those involved by establishing a mutual assistance system
With the introduction of the euro and the phasing-out of national currencies, there is also a shift from defending national interests to defending a Community interest.
With the introduction of the euro and the phasing-out of national currencies, there is also a shift from defending national interests to defending a Community interest.