natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta A6-0341/2005 z dne 30. novembra 2005 o mrežah žensk: ribolov, kmetovanje in raznolikost že priznal, da ženske v ribiškem sektorju niso dejavne samo v predelovanju, nabiranju in ribogojstvu, ampak tudi v trženju, raziskavah, novinarstvu, upravljanju, usposabljanju ter usposabljanju in zastopanosti tako v ribiškem kot v ribogojnem sektorju.
European Parliament Resolution A6-0341/2005 of 30 November 2005 on Women's networks : fishing, farming and diversification , that women in fisheries sector are active not only in processing, harvesting and aquaculture but also in marketing, research, journalism, management, training and representation in both the fisheries and aquaculture sectors.
Ženske imajo pomembno vlogo v predelovalni industriji in na nekaterih območjih ženske predstavljajo več kot 50 % vseh zaposlenih.
Women play a major role in the processing industry, and in some regions women account for over 50 % of the employees.
Ženske lahko veliko prispevajo k družbeno-gospodarskemu razvoju skupnosti, ki so odvisne od ribištva, in te možnosti je treba sedaj nujno izkoristiti.
Women can make a major contribution to the socio-economic development of fisheries dependent communities and it is now urgent to take advantage of these opportunities.
Prvi korak naprej bi lahko bilo vključevanje žensk v organe ali združenja odločanja.
To focus on integrating women in decision-making bodies or association can be a first step forward.
● Gospodarski vidiki
● Economic aspects
Jasni sklepi predstavitve so bili, da je logistika dostopanja do trgov težka, zaradi a) omejene razpoložljivosti kopnih skladišč, b) oddaljenosti od trga, c) roka trajanja proizvodov in d) omejenih tržnih in poslovnih izkušenj majhnih nosilcev dejavnosti.
Clear conclusions from the Hearing were that the logistics of accessing markets are difficult because of a) limited availability of onshore holding facilities b) remoteness from the market, c) product shelf life, and d) limited marketing and business experience of small operators.
Vaš poročevalec se strinja s temi sklepi in meni, da znatna drobitev krajev iztovarjanja ulova resno zaplete izvajanje nadzora, prevoz in trženje.
These conclusions are shared by your rapporteur who believes that a significant fragmentation of unloading points for catches seriously complicates the implementation of controls, transport and marketing.
Stališče ribičev glede prodajne cene proizvodov je oslabljeno, ker jim primanjkuje pogajalske moči.
The fishermen's positions regarding the sale price of the product is weakened since they lack negotiating power.
Ker ne obstaja struktura trženja sodelovalnega tipa, se ribiči srečujejo z znatnimi finančnimi izgubami.
The absence of a co-operative type marketing structure results in significant financial loss to the fishermen.
V veliko primerih je cena za potrošnike proizvodov obalnega ribištva previsoka, predvsem zaradi visokega števila posrednikov pri trženju proizvodov.
The price to consumers of the produce of inshore fishing is excessive in many cases, notably because of the high number of intermediate operators in the marketing of the produce.
Doseženo zvišanje cen nikoli ne doseže proizvajalca/ribiča.
None of the price increase achieved ever reaches the producer / fisherman.
● Konkurenca za vire in delo
● Competition for resources and labour
Obstoj različnih vrst ribištva, ki konkurirajo na istem fizičnem prostoru istih obalnih območij za iste ribe in rake, ne moremo prezreti.
The existence of different types of fisheries which are competing in the same physical space of the same coastal areas for the same fish and crustaceans cannot be ignored.
Obstaja tekmovanje med ribiči, ki delajo z isto vrsto ribolovnih orodij.
There is competition between fishermen working with the same type of fishing gear.
Obstaja tekmovanje med ribiči, ki uporabljajo različne vrste ribolovnih orodij, na primer med obalnimi plovili z vlečnimi mrežami in veliko manjšimi plovili.
There is the competition between fishermen using different types of fishing gear, for example between coastal trawlers and much smaller vessels.
Dodaten resen vidik, ki ga je treba upoštevati, je tekmovanje med nastajajočimi dejavnostmi, kot je rekreacijski ribolov.
Another serious aspect that must be considered is competition from emerging activities like recreational fishing.
Ker ne obstaja uradni okvir, rekreacijski ribolov ustvarja napetosti in vzbuja sovraštvo do tržne uporabe.
In the absence of any formal framework recreational fishing does raise tensions and does create animosity towards commercial uses.
Če to vprašanje ne bo resno obravnavano in se ne bo našlo rešitev, obstaja velika možnost, da se bodo nesoglasja med ribiško skupnostjo in drugimi obalnimi uporabniki nadaljevala.
Unless this question is tackled seriously and solutions found, it is highly likely that we will witness further conflicts between the fishing community and other inshore users.
Vaš poročevalec meni, da bi bilo treba, da bi se izognili tekmovanju za sredstva, uporabo morskega prostora urejati z dodeljevanjem pravic za izkoriščanje in dostop, na primer z omejevanjem razvoja določenih dejavnosti in z obveznim posedovanjem dovoljenja.
Your rapporteur believes that in order to avoid competition for resources the use of the sea spaces should be regulated by assigning exploitation and access rights, for example through restricting the development of certain activities and making licences compulsory.
● Varnostni vidiki
● Safety aspects
Obalno ribištvo trenutno izvajajo mala priobalna plovila, ki večinoma opravljajo dejavnost v bližini obale.
Inshore fisheries are presently carried on by small-scale vessels mostly operating near the coast.
Treba bi bilo uvesti tudi vrsto ukrepov, s ciljem povečati varnost na teh plovilih, glede na to, da so številna plovila, krajša od 12 metrov, stara ali zastarela.
A range of measures should also be introduced, aiming at enhancing safety on board these vessels, given that many craft under 12 metres length are old or obsolete.
Ob upoštevanju znatnih razlik med ribiškimi flotami za lov na odprtem morju in tistimi za mali priobalni ribolov, kar zadeva varnost, je še vedno pomembno urediti varnost na majhnih plovilih.
Bearing in mind the significant differences between high seas and small scale fishing fleets in relation to safety, it is still important to regulate the safety of small boats.
Ta koncept je jasno predstavljen v Miguelezovem poročilu o: Ribolov: varnost in vzroki nezgod
This concept clearly outlined in the Miguelez report on: Fisheries: safety and causes of accidents
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta A5-0087/2001 z dne 12. marca 2001 o ribištvu: varnost in vzroki nezgod , ki je bil sprejet v Odboru za ribištvo in na plenarnem zasedanju.
European Parliament Resolution A5-0087/2001 of 12 March 2001 on Fisheries: safety and causes of accidents was adopted in the Committee on Fisheries and the plenary .
Bodoči razvoj sektorja obalnega ribištva je odvisen od obstoja ustreznih predstavniških teles.
The future development of the inshore fisheries sector is dependant on the existence of appropriate representative bodies.
Odvisen je od oblikovanja ustreznih struktur upravljanja.
It is dependent on the creation of appropriate management structures.
Prav tako je odvisen od družbenih sprememb in gospodarskih vidikov, ki vplivajo na cene in ustvarjajo povpraševanje po proizvodih.
It is also dependent on social changes and on economic aspects that influence operating costs and create demand for the produce.
Najpomembneje pa je to, da je odvisen od sprejetja ustrezne zakonodaje EU, oblikovane posebej za ta sektor.
Most importantly it is dependant on the adoption of appropriate EU legislation specifically designed for the sector.
Vaš poročevalec želi poudariti potrebo po:
Your rapporteur would like to stress the need:
- priznanju družbenega in gospodarskega pomena sektorja;
- To acknowledge the social and economic significance of the sector.
- izboljšanju življenjskega standarda oseb, ki so odvisne od obalnega ribištva;
- To improve the living standards of the people dependant on inshore fisheries
- izvajanju primernih sistemov za poklicno usposabljanje, namenjenih zadevnim skupinam prebivalcev, ki se ukvarjajo z obalnim ribištvom, in razvoj tržnih sposobnosti;
- To implement adequate vocational training systems geared towards concerned groups of the inshore fisheries population, not least the development of marketing skills
- privabljanju mladih ljudi v sektor, da bi zagotovili njegovo kontinuiteto;
- To attract young people to the sector in order to ensure its continuity
- spodbujanju vključevanja žensk v sektor obalnega ribištva;
- To encourage the integration of women in the inshore sector
- razvoju in posodobitvi sektorja obalnega ribištva;
- To develop and modernise the inshore fishery sector.
- razvoju novih načinov trženja in popolne vključitve obalnih ribičev v postopek trgovanja;
- To develop new ways of commercialization and fully integrate coastal fishermen with the marketing process.
- okrepitvi sodelovanja in komunikacijskih kanalov med zadevnimi organizacijami in zainteresiranimi stranmi;
- To enhance co-operation and communication channels between organisations and stakeholders concerned.
- povezavi med nacionalno politiko o obalnem ribištvu in politikami Skupnosti;
- To integrate national politics on inshore fisheries with Community policies.
- odkritju novih ukrepov za zmanjšanje učinkov povečanja variabilnih stroškov, ki so posledica visoke nestabilnosti cen goriva;
- To devise measures to minimize the effects of the increase of variable costs that result from the high instability of fuel prices.
- ureditvi varnosti na majhnih plovilih, ki opravljajo obalne ribolovne dejavnosti;
- To regulate the safety onboard small vessels engaged in inshore fisheries.
- sprejetju nove pobude Skupnosti za ta pomemben sektor dejavnosti, ki naj jo spremljajo ustrezni zakonodajni predlogi.
- To adopt a new Community initiative for this important sector of activity, accompanied by appropriate draft legislation
Odbor za pravice žensk in enakost spolov poziva Odbor za ribištvo, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. poziva Komisijo, da najprej zbere in preuči po spolu diferencirane podatke o obalnem ribištvu in nato v sodelovanju s prihodnjim Evropskim inštitutom za enakost med spoloma pripravi in predlaga rešitve za posebne težave žensk v skupnostih obalnega ribištva;
Urges the Commission firstly to gather and analyse gender-differentiated data on inshore fishing and secondly to identify and propose solutions to the specific problems facing women in inshore-fishing communities, in cooperation with the future European Institute for Gender Equality;
6. poziva Komisijo, da razširi področje uporabe Direktive 86/613/EGS o uporabi načela enake obravnave med samozaposlenimi moškimi in ženskami, vključenimi v dejavnost, vključno s kmetijstvom, ter o zaščiti samozaposlenih žensk tekom nosečnosti in materinstva
Calls on the Commission to extend the scope of Directive 86/613/EEC on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity, including agriculture, in a self-employed capacity, and on the protection of self-employed women during pregnancy and motherhood
56. , tako da bo zajemala tudi dejavnosti žensk v ribiški industriji;
56. , so that it also covers women's activities in the fishing industry;
Obalno ribištvo in težave obalnih ribičev
Inshore fishing and the problems encountered by inshore fishermen
Obalno ribištvo in težave, s katerimi se srečujejo obalni ribiči
Inshore fishing and the problems encountered by inshore fishermen
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1785/2003 v zvezi z uvoznim režimom za riž
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 as regards the arrangements for importing rice
(Poenostavljeni postopek – člen 43(1) poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure – Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0098 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0098 )
UL C ... / Še neobjavljeno v UL.
OJ C ... / Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 36 in tretjega pododstavka člena 37(2) pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0085/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 36 and Article 37(2), third subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0085/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 51 in člena 43(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6–0142/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0142/2006 ),
Predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1785/2003 v zvezi z uvoznim režimom za riž
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 as regards the arrangements for importing rice
o rezultatih preverjanja zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo
on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................12
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................12
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o rezultatih preverjanja zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo, z dne 27. septembra 2005 ( KOM(2005)0462 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 27 September 2005 to the Council and the European Parliament on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator ( COM(2005)0462 ),
– ob upoštevanju pisma svojega predsednika z dne 23. januarja 2006
– having regard to the letter from its President to the President of the Commission dated 23 January 2006
Pres-A-Courrier D(2006)300689. , poslanega predsedniku Evropske komisije,
Pres-A-Courrier D(2006)300689). ,
– ob upoštevanju pisma predsednika Evropske komisije predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. marca 2006;
– having regard to the letter from the President of the Commission to the President of the European Parliament dated 8 March 2006,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0143/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0143/2006 ),
A. ker je Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 27. septembra 2005 napovedala, da namerava umakniti 68 predlogov, za katere ocenjuje, da niso skladni s cilji lizbonske strategije ter načeli bolje oblikovanih predpisov, in da bodo drugi predlogi na podlagi ponovno opravljene presoje gospodarskega vpliva po potrebi spremenjeni,
A. in its communication of 27 September 2005, the Commission announced its intention to withdraw 68 proposals that it considers inconsistent with the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy and the principles of Better Regulation, while others will be subject to a reviewed economic impact assessment and, if appropriate, modified,
B. ker predsednik Evropskega parlamenta v pismu, ki ga je poslal predsedniku Komisije po analizi tega sporočila v parlamentarnih odborih, na splošno pozdravlja namere Komisije, hkrati pa jo izrecno prosi, naj ne umakne nekaterih predlogov, in ker nasprotuje spremembi nekaterih drugih predlogov,
B. the letter sent by the President of the European Parliament to the President of the Commission at the outcome of the analysis of that communication by the parliamentary committees generally welcomes the intentions of the Commission, but specifically asks it not to withdraw several of those proposals and objects to the possible modification of some other proposals,
C. predsednik Komisije je v odgovoru predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta navedel, da je Komisija, preden je sprejela svoje dokončno stališče, ustrezno preučila stališče Evropskega parlamenta; podal je podrobne razloge, zakaj Komisija ni upoštevala nekaterih zahtev Evropskega parlamenta in navedel možne pobude, ki jih kot odziv na te zahteve v prihodnosti namerava podati Komisija,
C. the reply sent by the President of the Commission to the President of the European Parliament states that the Commission took into due consideration the position of Parliament before adopting its final position and indicates the specific reasons why the Commission did not follow some of the requests of Parliament, as well as the possible initiatives that the Commission plans to undertake, in the future, to address some of those requests,
D. ker je to sporočilo idealna priložnost za temeljitejšo analizo vprašanj v zvezi z umikom ali spremembo zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije,
D. that communication provides an excellent opportunity for a more thorough analysis of the problems connected with the withdrawal or the modification of legislative proposals by the Commission,
E. ker se zakonodajni akti Skupnosti z nekaterimi izjemami lahko sprejmejo le na podlagi predloga Komisije, ki ima skoraj popoln monopol nad zakonodajno pobudo,
E. with a few exceptions, most of the Community’s legislative acts can only be adopted on the basis of a proposal from the Commission, which enjoys a quasi-monopoly over the legislative initiative,
F. ker Pogodba ES v drugem odstavku člena 250 določa, da lahko Komisija, "dokler Svet ne odloči", svoj predlog med postopkom za sprejetje akta Skupnosti kadar koli spremeni,
F. Article 250(2), of the EC Treaty stipulates that the Commission ‘may alter its proposal’ at any moment of the procedure leading to the adoption of a Community act, ‘as long as the Council has not acted’,
G. ker je treba kljub temu, da zaradi zgodovinskih razlogov vloga Parlamenta ni omenjena v drugem odstavku člena 250, razlagati to odločbo skupaj s členom 252, če se uporablja za postopek soodločanja, in skupaj s členom 252, če se uporablja za postopek sodelovanja,
G. although, for historical reasons, the role of Parliament is not mentioned in Article 250(2), that provision must be interpreted in conjunction with Article 251 as concerns its application to the codecision procedure, and with Article 252 as concerns the cooperation procedure,
H. ker je za primere, ko je po prvi obravnavi sprejeto skupno stališče, v tretji alinei drugega pododstavka člena 251(2) Pogodbe ES Komisiji dovoljeno, da Evropski parlament obvesti o svojem stališču, medtem ko je v primeru, da Parlament naknadno spremeni skupno stališče, v točki (c) tretjega pododstavka člena 251(2) Komisiji dovoljeno zgolj, da poda mnenje, na podlagi česar je jasno, da Komisija ni več "lastnica" svojega predloga,
H. whenever a common position is adopted after the first reading, the third indent of the second subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty only allows the Commission to inform Parliament of its own position and whereas, if the common position is subsequently amended by Parliament, point (c) in the third subparagraph of Article 251(2) only allows the Commission to deliver an opinion, so that it is clear that the Commission is no longer the ‘owner’ of its proposals,
I. ker pogodbe ne omenjajo možnosti, da Komisija umakne zakonodajni predlog,
I. the Treaties are silent as to the possibility of the Commission withdrawing a legislative proposal,
J. ker Komisija kljub odsotnosti določb o umiku zakonodajnih predlogov redno umika zakonodajne predloge,
J. this absence of provisions concerning the withdrawal of legislative proposals has not prevented the Commission from regularly withdrawing legislative proposals,
K. ker se Parlament, Svet in Komisija ne uspejo sporazumeti o tem, kolikšne pristojnosti naj ima Komisija v zvezi z umikom zakonodajnih predlogov,
K. Parliament, Council and the Commission seem not to agree on the exact extent to which the Commission is entitled to withdraw its legislative proposals,
L. ker Komisija kljub tem nesoglasjem redno umika zakonodajne predloge, ne da bi bile zadeve kadar koli predložene Sodišču,
L. despite these disagreements, the withdrawal of legislative proposals has been a regular practice of the Commission, without ever having given rise to a case brought before the Court,
M. ker je tudi Parlament včasih pozval Komisijo, naj umakne svoje predloge,
M. Parliament itself has sometimes in the past asked the Commission to withdraw its proposals,
N. ker okvirni sporazum
N. the framework agreement
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0194 , priloga. o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo z dne 26. maja 2005 določa:
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0194 , Annex. on relations between Parliament and the Commission of 26 May 2005 stipulates that:
– za vse zakonodajne predloge se "Komisija zavezuje, da bo natančno preučila spremembe k svojim zakonodajnim predlogom, ki jih je sprejel Parlament, z namenom njihovega upoštevanja v morebitnem spremenjenem predlogu" (točka 31)
– in all legislative procedures, ‘the Commission undertakes to carefully examine amendments to its legislative proposals adopted by Parliament, with a view to taking them into account in any amended proposal’ (point 31),
– da v vseh zakonodajnih postopkih "Komisija pred umikom predlogov o tem obvesti Parlament in Svet" (točka 32),
– in all legislative procedures, ‘the Commission shall give Parliament and the Council prior notification before withdrawing its proposals’ (point 32),
– da se za zakonodajne postopke, ki ne vključujejo soodločanja, Komisija zavezuje, da bo "po potrebi" umaknila zakonodajne predloge, ki jih je Parlament zavrnil, in da bo tudi pojasnila razloge, zaradi katerih se je odločila ohraniti predlog (točka 33),
– in legislative procedures not entailing codecision, the Commission undertakes to withdraw legislative proposals that have been rejected by Parliament, ‘if appropriate’, and also to explain the reasons for not doing so if it decides to maintain the proposal (point 33),
O. ker bi sporazum o umiku in v potrebni meri o spremembi zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije, temelječ na skupnih smernicah treh institucij, pozitivno prispeval k nemotenemu poteku zakonodajnih postopkov,
O. an understanding, based on common guidelines between the three institutions, regarding the withdrawal and, to the extent necessary, the modification of legislative proposals by the Commission would positively contribute to the smooth running of legislative procedures,
4. poziva Komisijo, naj takoj po svojem imenovanju Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu posreduje seznam zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije v predhodni sestavi, ki jih namerava ohraniti;
Asks the Commission, immediately after it has been appointed, to draw up and submit to Parliament and the Council a list stating which of its predecessor’s legislative proposals it intends to retain;
7. kljub temu ugotavlja, da znotraj jasno začrtanih meja zmožnost Komisije, da umakne zakonodajni predlog med postopkom za njegovo sprejetje,
Recognises, however, that, within clear limits, the ability of the Commission to withdraw a legislative proposal during a procedure leading to its adoption
– izhaja iz njene pravice do zakonodajne pobude in logično dopolnjuje njeno zmožnost, da spremeni svoj predlog,
– flows from its right of legislative initiative and constitutes a logical complement to its ability to modify a proposal,
– lahko prispeva h krepitvi vloge Komisije v zakonodajnem postopku in
– may contribute to enhancing the role of the Commission in the legislative procedure, and
– se lahko obravnava kot pozitiven dejavnik, ki zagotavlja, da postopki za sprejetje akta Skupnosti in medinstitucionalni dialog potekajo v duhu uveljavljanja "interesov Skupnosti";
– can be considered as a positive element in ensuring that the procedures leading to the adoption of a Community act and the interinstitutional dialogue are aimed at promoting the ‘Community interest’;