natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice zagotovijo, da so vsem prosilcem za azil, katerih prošnja je predmet predhodne obravnave v skladu s členom 33, dana jamstva, navedena v členu 9(1) , in bi zato za njih morali veljati minimalni postopkovni standardi iz te direktive.
Member States shall ensure that applicants for asylum whose application is subject to a preliminary examination pursuant to Article 33 enjoy the guarantees listed in Article 9 (1) and should in principle be subject to the minimum procedural standards of this Directive .
Člen 34, odstavek 2, točka (b)
Article 34, paragraph 2, point (b)
(b) zahtevajo od zadevnega prosilca, da predloži nove podatke v določenem roku od trenutka, ko jih je pridobil;
(b) require submission of the new information by the applicant concerned within a time limit after which it has been obtained by him or her;
(b) zahtevajo od zadevnega prosilca, da predloži nove podatke v navedenem določenem roku od trenutka, ko jih je pridobil;
(b) require submission of the new information by the applicant concerned within a specified time limit after which it has been obtained by him or her,
Časovne omejitve je treba jasno navesti, kar zagotavlja upoštevanje prosilca.
Time limits must be clearly outlined, so to ensure the applicant is given due consideration.
Člen 35, odstavek 1
Article 35, paragraph 1
Države članice lahko v skladu z osnovnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II določijo postopke, s katerimi bi se na mejah ali tranzitnih področjih države članice odločilo o prošnjah, vloženih na teh krajih.
Member States may provide for procedures, in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II, in order to decide, at the border or transit zones of the Member State, on the applications made at such locations.
Države članice lahko ob upoštevanju mednarodnih konvencij in v skladu z osnovnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II določijo postopke, s katerimi bi se na mejah ali tranzitnih področjih države članice odločilo o prošnjah, vloženih na teh krajih.
Member States may provide for procedures, in compliance with the international conventions and in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II, in order to decide, at the border or transit zones of the Member State, on the applications made at such locations.
Ob upoštevanju vseh možnih oblik zaščite za prosilce za azil se lahko država članica odloči, da prosilcu za azil ne dovoli vstopa na svoje ozemlje, le v primeru groženj nacionalni varnosti in javnemu redu.
Taking into account all the possible forms of protection for applicants for asylum, only in the event of threats to national security and public order may a Member State decide not to allow an applicant for asylum to enter its territory.
Člen 35, odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 35, paragraph 1 a (new)
Države članice zagotovijo, da je sklep o zavrnitvi vstopa na ozemlje države članice zaradi razloga, ki izhaja iz prošnje za azil, sprejet v dveh tednih, ob upoštevanju podaljšanja roka za največ dva tedna, o čemer se je dogovoril ustrezen sodni organ v postopku, ki je predpisan z zakonom.
Member States shall ensure that a decision to refuse entry to the territory of a Member State for a reason arising from the application for asylum is taken within two weeks, subject to an extension of the time limit for no more than two weeks agreed upon by a competent judicial body in a procedure prescribed by law.
Nobenega razloga ni, da so zahteve primernega zakonitega postopka za primere, ko so prošnje za azil predložene na meji, manjše od zahtev v primerih, ko so prošnje predložene znotraj ozemlja.
There is no reason for requirements of due process of law in asylum cases submitted at the border to be less than for those submitted within the territory.
Razlike in nadzorni ukrepi lahko prisilijo prosilce za azil in begunce, da vstopijo v državo in ostanejo v njej nezakonito, da bi si tako zagotovili višje standarde v azilnem postopku.
Differences in safeguards may compel asylum-seekers and refugees to enter and stay illegally, in order to be assured of higher standards in the asylum procedure.
Dovoljen bi bil lahko poseben postopek, toda na podlagi istih osnovnih načel in ugodnosti, ki jih zagotavlja direktiva.
A specific procedure could be allowed but under the same basic principles and guarantees ensured by the Directive.
Člen 35, odstavek 1 b (novo)
Article 35, paragraph 1 b (new)
Posledica neupoštevanja rokov iz odstavka 1(a) je, da je prosilcu za azil odobren vstop na ozemlje države članice z namenom, da bo ta prošnja obravnavana v skladu z ostalimi določbami te direktive.
Non-compliance with the time limits provided for in paragraph 1a shall result in the applicant for asylum being granted entry to the territory of the Member State in order for his application to be processed in accordance with the other provisions of this Directive.
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo prosilci za azil, ki se jim zavrne vstop v skladu s tem postopkom, ugodnosti iz poglavja V.
Member States shall ensure that applicants for asylum, who are refused entry in accordance with this procedure, enjoy the guarantees referred to in Chapter V.
Glej obrazložitev člena 35, odstavek 1 a (novo).
See justification to article 35, paragraph 1 a (new).
Člen 35, odstavek 1 c (novo)
Article 35, paragraph 1 c (new)
Zavrnitev vstopa na ozemlje ne more ovreči sklepa o prošnji za azil po pregledu na podlagi dejstev primera s strani oblasti, pristojnih za področje azilnega prava in prava o beguncih.
The refusal of entry into the territory can not override the decision on the application for asylum after an examination on the basis of the facts of the case by authorities competent in the field of asylum and refugee law.
Člen 35, odstavek 2
Article 35, paragraph 2
Kadar pa postopki, ki jih določa odstavek 1, ne obstajajo, lahko države članice, na podlagi določb tega člena in v skladu z zakoni in drugimi predpisi, veljavnimi v času sprejetja te direktive, ohranijo postopke, ki odstopajo od splošnih načel in jamstev iz Poglavja II, s katerimi se na meji ali na tranzitnih območjih odločili o tem, ali se prosilcem za azil, ki so prispeli in prošnjo za azil vložili na teh krajih, dovoli vstop na njihovo ozemlje.
However, when procedures as set out in paragraph 1 do not exist, Member States may maintain, subject to the provisions of this Article and in accordance with the laws or regulations in force at the time of the adoption of this Directive, procedures derogating from the basic principles and guarantees described in Chapter II, in order to decide, at the border or in transit zones, on the permission to enter their territory of applicants for asylum who have arrived and made an application for asylum at such locations.
Člen 35, odstavek 3
Article 35, paragraph 3
S postopki iz odstavka 2 se poskrbi, da se zadevnim osebam:
The procedures referred to in paragraph 2 shall ensure in particular that the persons concerned:
– dovoli, da ostanejo na meji ali tranzitnih območjih države članice ne glede na člen 6; in
- shall be allowed to remain at the border or transit zones of the Member State, without prejudice to Article 6; and
– takoj dajo informacije o njihovih pravicah in obveznostih, opisanih v členu 9(1)(a); in
- must be immediately informed of their rights and obligations, as described in Article 9 (1) (a); and
– omogoči dostop, če je to potrebno, do storitev tolmača, kot je opisano v členu 9(1)(b); in
- have access, if necessary, to the services of an interpreter, as described in Article 9 (1) (b); and
– preden pristojni organ sprejme odločitev v takšnih postopkih omogoči osebni razgovor v zvezi z njihovo prošnjo za azil, ki ga vodijo osebe s primernim znanjem o ustreznih standardih, ki veljajo na področju azilnega in begunskega prava, kot je opisano v členih 10 do 12; in
- are interviewed, before the competent authority takes a decision in such procedures, in relation to their application for asylum by persons with appropriate knowledge of the relevant standards applicable in the field of asylum and refugee law, as described in Articles 10 to 12; and
– omogoči posvetovanje s pravnim ali drugim svetovalcem, ki ga kot takega priznava nacionalna zakonodaja, kot je opisano v členu 13(1); in
- can consult a legal adviser or counsellor admitted or permitted as such under national law, as described in Article 13 (1); and
– omogoči predstavnik, imenovan v primerih mladoletnih oseb brez spremstva, kot je opisano v členu 15(1), razen če velja člen 15(2) ali (3).
- have a representative appointed in the case of unaccompanied minors, as described in Article 15 (1), unless Article 15(2) or (3) applies.
Poleg tega, kadar pristojni organ ne dovoli vstopa, ta pristojni organ navede dejanske in pravne razloge, zakaj se prosilčeva prošnja za azil šteje za neutemeljeno ali nesprejemljivo.
Moreover, in case permission to enter is refused by a competent authority, this competent authority shall state the reasons in fact and in law why his/her application for asylum is considered as unfounded or as inadmissible.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se odločitev v okviru postopkov iz odstavka 2 sprejme v razumnem roku.
Member States shall ensure that a decision in the framework of the procedures provided for in paragraph 2 is taken within a reasonable time.
Kadar se odločitev ne sprejme v štirih tednih, se prosilcu za azil dovoli vstop na ozemlje države članice, da bi se njegovo prošnjo začelo obravnavati v skladu z drugimi določbami te direktive.
When a decision has not been taken within four weeks, the applicant for asylum shall be granted entry to the territory of the Member State in order for his/her application to be processed in accordance with the other provisions of this Directive.
Člen 35, odstavek 5
Article 35, paragraph 5
V primeru posebnih vrst prihodov ali prihodov, pri katerih gre za veliko število državljanov tretje države ali oseb brez državljanstva, ki vložijo prošnje za azil na meji ali na tranzitnih območjih, zaradi česar je praktično nemogoče izvajati določbe iz odstavka 1 ali poseben postopek, določen v odstavkih 2 in 3, je navedene postopke mogoče izvajati tudi kadar in kolikor časa so ti državljani tretje države in osebe brez državljanstva normalno nastanjeni v bližini meje ali tranzitnega območja.
In the event of particular types of arrivals or arrivals involving a large number of third country nationals or stateless persons lodging applications for asylum at the border or in a transit zone, which makes it practically impossible to apply there the provisions of paragraph 1 or the specific procedure set out in paragraphs 2 and 3, those procedures may also be applied where and for as long as these third country nationals or stateless persons are accommodated normally at locations in proximity to the border or transit zone.
Člen 35 A
Article 35 A
Člen 35A
Article 35A
Države članice lahko, kadar pristojni organ na podlagi dejstev ugotovi, da prosilec poskuša nelegalno vstopiti ali je nelegalno vstopil na ozemlje države članice iz varne tretje države v skladu z odstavkom 2, določijo, da ne bo nikakršne obravnave ali nikakršne celovite obravnave prošnje za azil in zaščite prosilca v njegovih posebnih okoliščinah, kot je opisano v Poglavju II.
Member States may provide that no, or no full, examination of the asylum application and of the safety of the applicant in his/her particular circumstances as described in Chapter II takes place in cases where a competent authority has established, on the basis of the facts, that the applicant for asylum is seeking to enter or has entered illegally into its territory from a safe third country according to paragraph 2.
Tretja država za namene odstavka 1 velja za varno tretjo državo, kadar:
A third country can only be considered as a safe third country for the purpose of paragraph 1 where:
(a) je ratificirala in upošteva določbe Ženevske konvencije brez geografskih omejitev; in
(a) it has ratified and observes the provisions of the Geneva Convention without any geographical limitations; and
(b) je vzpostavila azilni postopek, kakor je predpisan z zakonodajo; in
(b) it has in place an asylum procedure prescribed by law; and
(c) je ratificirala Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter upošteva njene določbe, vključno s standardi, ki veljajo za učinkovita pravna sredstva; in
(c) it has ratified the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and it observes its provisions, including the standards relating to effective remedies; and
(d) tako določi Svet v skladu z odstavkom 3.
(d) it has been so designated by the Council in accordance with paragraph 3.
Svet na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom s kvalificirano večino sprejme ali spremeni skupen seznam tretjih držav, ki veljajo za varne tretje države, za namen odstavka 1.
The Council shall, acting by qualified majority on the proposal of the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament, adopt or amend a common list of third countries that shall be regarded as safe third countries for the purposes of paragraph 1.
Zadevne države članice v nacionalni zakonodaji določijo načine izvajanja določb odstavka 1 in rezultatov odločitev po določbah v skladu z načelom nevračanja v okviru Ženevske konvencije, vključno z določitvijo izjem pri izvajanju tega člena zaradi humanitarnih ali političnih razlogov ali razlogov v zvezi z mednarodnim javnim pravom.
Member States concerned shall lay down in national law the modalities for implementing the provisions of paragraph 1 and the consequences of decisions pursuant to those provisions in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement under the Geneva Convention including providing for exceptions from the application of this Article for humanitarian or political reasons or for reasons of public international law.
Pri izvajanju odločitve, ki temelji izključno na tem členu, zadevne države članice:
When implementing a decision solely based on this Article, Member States concerned shall:
(a) ustrezno obvestijo prosilca; in
(a) inform the applicant accordingly; and
(b) posredujejo prosilcu dokument, s katerim oblastem tretje države v jeziku te države sporočajo, da prošnja vsebinsko ni bila obravnavana.
(b) provide him/her with a document informing the authorities of the third country, in the language of that country, that the application has not been examined in substance.
Kadar varna tretja država zadevnega prosilca za azil ne sprejme nazaj, države članice zagotovijo dostop do postopka v skladu z osnovnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II.
Where the safe third country does not readmit the applicant for asylum in question, Member States shall ensure that access to a procedure is given in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees described in Chapter II.
Države članice, ki so tretje države označile kot varne tretje države v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, veljavno na dan sprejema te direktive, in na podlagi meril iz odstavka 2(a) do (c), lahko odstavek 1 uporabljajo za te tretje države, dokler Svet ne sprejme skupnega seznama v skladu z odstavkom 3.
Member States which have designated third countries as safe countries in accordance with national legislation in force at the date of the adoption of this Directive and on the basis of the criteria in paragraph 2(a) to (c), may apply paragraph 1 to these third countries until such time as the Council has adopted the common list pursuant to paragraph 3.
Pojem tako imenovane „zelo varne države“ je veliko bolj nesprejemljiv v primerjavi z načelom varne države, ker za ta postopek ne veljajo nobena najnujnejša načela in jamstva in zato se lahko hkrati zavrne dostop do azilnega postopka in ozemlja.
The concept of the so called "super safe country" is far more unacceptable compare to the safe country principle because no minimum principles and guarantees apply to this procedure and access to the asylum procedure and territory may be denied altogether.
Takšna zavrnitev predstavlja tveganje kršenja mednarodnega prava o beguncih.
Such denial risks being a violation of international refugee law.
Nobeni kategoriji prosilca se ne sme popolnoma preprečiti dostop do azilnega postopka.
No category of applicant should be denied access to an asylum procedure completely.
Tudi UNHCR močno priporoča črtanje tega člena, ki ni bil predviden v predlogu Komisije.
UNHCR also strongly recommends the deletion of this article, which was not foreseen in the Commission proposal.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se lahko obravnava za odvzem statusa begunca določeni osebi začne, kadar se pojavijo novi elementi ali ugotovitve, ki kažejo na razloge za ponovno presojo veljavnosti statusa begunca .
Member States shall ensure that an examination may be started to withdraw the refugee status of a particular person when new elements or findings arise indicating that there are reasons to reconsider the validity of his/her refugee status.
Države članice lahko začnejo z odvzemom statusa begunca določeni osebi , če:
Member States may begin to withdraw the refugee status of a particular person if:
Prvotni člen je bil preveč nejasen in ga je bilo mogoče zlorabiti.
Initial Article was too vague and open to misuse.
Ponovno je bil oblikovan zaradi skladnosti s Konvencijo iz leta 1951.
It has been redrafted to ensure conformity with 1951 Convention.
Člen 36, točka (a) (novo)
Article 36, point (a) (new)
(a) prosilec prostovoljno ponovno sprejme zaščito države njegovega državljanstva; ali
(a) the applicant has voluntarily re-availed himself/herself of the protection of the country of his/her nationality; or
Sledi spremembi člena 36.
Follows Amendment to Article 36.
Člen 36, točka (b) (novo)
Article 36, point (b) (new)
(b) prosilec, potem, ko ga je izgubil, prostovoljno znova pridobi svoje državljanstvo; ali
(b) having once lost it, the applicant has voluntarily reacquired his/her nationality; or
Člen 36, točka (c) (novo)
Article 36, point (c) (new)
(c) prosilec pridobi novo državljanstvo in uživa zaščito države novega državljanstva; ali
(c) the applicant has acquired a new nationality, and enjoys the protection of the country of the new nationality; or
Člen 36, točka (d) (novo)
Article 36, point (d) (new)
(d) prosilec prostovoljno spet prebiva v državi, v katero se nekoč ni hotel vrniti zaradi grožnje pregona.
(d) the applicant has voluntarily re-established residence in the country to which he/she would at one time not return because of fear of persecution.
Člen 37, odstavek 4
Article 37, paragraph 4
Ne glede na odstavke 1, 2 in 3 se države članice lahko odločijo, da status begunca zastara v primeru prenehanja v skladu s pododstavki (a), (b), (c) in (d) člena 11(1) Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES ali če se je begunec nedvoumno odpovedal temu, da bi mu bil priznan status.
By derogation to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, Member States may decide that the refugee status lapses by law in case of cessation in accordance with Article 11(1), sub-paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC or if the refugee has unequivocally renounced his/her recognition as a refugee.
Pravice prosilca niso zaščitene, ker na podlagi izvirnega besedila ni treba spoštovati postopkovnih jamstev.
Applicants' rights unprotected as no procedural guarantees must be respected in the original text.
Člen 38, odstavek 1, točka a, točka iii
Article 38, paragraph 1, point (a), point (iii)
(iii) o tem, da se v skladu s členom 35A obravnava ne opravi;
(iii) not to conduct an examination pursuant to Article 35A;
Črtanje je povezano s črtanjem člena 35A.
Deletion linked to the deletion of Article 35 A.
Člen 38, odstavek 1, točka d
Article 38, paragraph 1, point (d)
(d) odločitev o prepovedi vstopa v okviru postopkov, določenih v členu 35 (2);
(d) a decision refusing entry within the framework of the procedures provided for under Article 35 (2);
(d) odločitev o prepovedi vstopa v okviru postopkov, določenih v členu 35;
(d) a decision refusing entry within the framework of the procedures provided for under Article 35;
Povezano s spremembo v členu 35.
Linked to modification in article 35.
Člen 38, odstavek 3, uvodni del
Article 38, paragraph 3, introductory part
Države članice , kadar je to primerno, določijo pravila v skladu s svojimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi, ki obravnavajo:
Member States shall, where appropriate, provide for rules in accordance with their international obligations dealing with:
Države članice zagotovijo, da prosilci ostanejo v državi članici do izida pravnega postopka iz odstavka 1.
Member States shall ensure that the remedy pursuant to paragraph 1 shall have the effect of allowing applicants to remain in the Member State pending its outcome.
V Evropi so mnogi begunci priznani le med pritožbenim postopkom.
Many refugees in Europe are recognised only during the appeal process.
Glede na možne resne posledice napačnega odločanja na prvi stopnji je zadržanje izvajanja azilnih pritožb odločilen zaščitni ukrep.
Given the potentially serious consequences of an erroneous determination at first instance, the suspensive effect of asylum appeals is a critical safeguard.
Člen 38, odstavek 3, točka a
Article 38, paragraph 3, point (a)
(a) vprašanje, ali naj pravno sredstvo v skladu z odstavkom 1 prosilcu omogoči, da ostane v zadevni državi članici do njegovega izida; in
(a) the question of whether the remedy pursuant to paragraph 1 shall have the effect of allowing applicants to remain in the Member State concerned pending its outcome; and
Glej obrazložitev člena 38, odstavek 3, uvodni stavek.
See the justification to article 38, paragraph 3, introductory phrase.
Člen 38, odstavek 3, točka b
Article 38, paragraph 3, point (b)
(b) možnostjo zakonitega pravnega sredstva ali zaščitnih ukrepov, kadar pravno sredstvo v skladu z odstavkom 1 prosilcu ne omogoči, da ostane v zadevni državi članici do njegovega izida.
(b) the possibility of legal remedy or protective measures where the remedy pursuant to paragraph 1 does not have the effect of allowing applicants to remain in the Member State concerned pending its outcome.
Države članice lahko priskrbijo tudi pravno sredstvo po uradni dolžnosti; in
Member States may also provide for an ex officio remedy; and
Člen 38, odstavek 3, točka c
Article 38, paragraph 3, point (c)
(c) temeljev za ugovor zoper odločitev iz člena 25(2)(c) v skladu z metodologijo, ki se uporablja po členu 27(2)(b) in (c).
(c) the grounds of challenge to a decision under Article 25(2)(c) in accordance with the methodology applied under Article 27(2)(b) and (c).
Člen 38, odstavek 5
Article 38, paragraph 5
Kadar se prosilcu prizna status, ki ponuja enake pravice in ugodnosti v okviru nacionalne zakonodaje in zakonodaje Skupnosti kot status begunca na podlagi Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES, se lahko za prosilca šteje, da ima učinkovito pravno sredstvo, kadar sodišče na podlagi nezadostnega interesa prosilca za nadaljevanje postopkov odloči, da je pravno sredstvo iz odstavka 1 nesprejemljivo ali da bo najverjetneje neuspešno.
Where an applicant has been granted a status, which offers the same rights and benefits under national and Community law as the refugee status by virtue of Council Directive 2004/83/EC, the applicant may be considered to have an effective remedy where a court or tribunal decides that the remedy pursuant to paragraph 1 is inadmissible or unlikely to succeed on the basis of insufficient interest on the part of the applicant in maintaining the proceedings.
Člen 38, odstavek 6
Article 38, paragraph 6
Države članice lahko v nacionalni zakonodaji določijo tudi pogoje, na podlagi katerih se lahko domneva, da je prosilec implicitno umaknil ali odstopil od svoje prošnje za azil v skladu z odstavkom 1, skupaj s pravili o postopku, ki jih je treba upoštevati.
Member States may also lay down in national legislation the conditions under which it can be assumed that an applicant has implicitly withdrawn or abandoned his/her remedy pursuant to paragraph 1, together with the rules on the procedure to be followed.
Zaradi enotnosti in skladnosti s prejšnjimi predlogi sprememb je tudi tu vključeno sklicevanje na mednarodne konvencije.
For the sake of uniformity and consistency with the previous amendments, reference to the international conventions is also made here.