natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V skladu s členom 10, prvi pododstavek, točka b) protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Vural Öger uživa v času zasedanj Evropskega parlamenta imuniteto pred kakršnim koli priporom in sodnim postopkom na ozemlju vseh držav članic, ki niso njegova država.
Pursuant to Article 10, first paragraph, point (b) of the PPI, Mr Öger enjoys, during the sessions of the European Parliament, immunity from any measure of detention and from legal proceedings in the territory of any Member State other than his own.
Kot izhaja iz zahteve po odvzemu parlamentarne imunitete Vuralu Ögerju, so bile izjave in resne ovadbe proti Vuralu Ögerju v zvezi z njegovo morebitno vpletenostjo v ugrabitev na ozemlju Kraljevine Belgije septembra 2005 izrečene v okviru preiskovalnega postopka pri prvostopenjskem sodišču v Bruslju.
As noted in the request for waiver of Mr Öger’s parliamentary immunity, a series of statements and serious allegations have been made against Mr Öger during the investigation of a case before the Court of First Instance in Brussels concerning a kidnapping which took place in Belgium in September 2005.
Vendar ni povsem jasno, ali je namen zahteve za odvzem imunitete Vuralu Ögerju ta, da se začne sodni postopek proti njemu kot obdolžencu, in katera konkretna kazniva dejanja so mu očitana.
However, it is not at all clear whether the purpose of the request for waiver of Mr Öger’s immunity is to allow legal proceedings to be taken against him as a defendant or of what crimes he is actually being accused.
Treba je poudariti, da če je namen belgijskih oblasti ta, da poslanec Öger nastopi kot priča, ni potrebno zahtevati odvzema imunitete, če so upoštevana pravila iz člena 7(5) poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta.
It should be stressed that if the intention of the Belgian authorities is to summon Mr Öger as a witness, there is no need to request a waiver of immunity when the provisions under Rule 7(5) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament are complied with.
V tem primeru zahteva za odvzem parlamentarne imunitete Vuralu Ögerju ne more biti obravnavana kot zahteva, ki naj omogoči preiskavo proti poslancu Ögerju kot obdolžencu.
Accordingly, the request for waiver of Mr Öger’s immunity cannot be interpreted as a means to enable an investigation to be conducted against him as a defendant.
Ker Odbor za pravne zadeve nima na voljo zadostnih informacij o tem, česa je osumljen Vural Öger in katera kazniva dejanja so mu očitana, meni, da ne more preučiti, ali obstajajo elementi, ki bi dopuščali domnevo, da gre v tej zadevi za "fumus persecutionis".
Since the Committee on Legal Affairs does not have sufficient information on the nature of the suspicions against Mr Öger and any criminal offences of which he might be accused, it is unable to consider whether there is any evidence to suggest that this case is a matter of fumus persecutionis.
Zato je Odbor za pravne zadeve sklenil, da zaradi ohranjanja integritete Parlamenta kot demokratične zakonodajne skupščine in zagotavljanja neodvisnosti poslancev pri opravljanju njihovih nalog ne bo odvzel imunitete Vuralu Ögerju.
Therefore, with a view to preserving Parliament’s integrity as a democratic legislative assembly and to safeguarding the independence of the Member concerned in the performance of his tasks, the Committee on Legal Affairs has decided not to waive Mr Öger’s immunity.
Zahteva za odvzem imunitete Vuralu Ögerju
Request for waiver of the immunity of Vural Öger
Zahteva za odvzem imunitete vložil* Datum zahteve Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Request for waiver from* Date of request Date announced in plenary *In one language only
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/2003 o skupni ureditvi trga za žita
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0755 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0755 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0044/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0044/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6‑0141/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0141/2007 ),
Komisija v svojem predlogu načrtuje odpravo intervencije za koruzo od tržnega leta 2007/2008 dalje.
In its proposal the Commission plans to abolish maize intervention from the 2007/08 marketing year onwards.
Predlog temelji na podatkih iz dveh tržnih let (2004/2005 in 2005/2006).
The Commission's proposal is based on data from two marketing years (2004/05 and 2005/06).
V tem obdobju so intervencijske zaloge koruze v EU-25 znašale 5,6 milijona ton, kar je 40 odstotkov celotnih intervencijskih zalog.
During this period, the intervention stocks of maize in the EU25 amounted to 5,6 Mt, accounting for 40% of total intervention stock.
Večina teh zalog (93 %) je na Madžarskem.
The bulk of these stocks (93%) are located in Hungary.
Komisija pričakuje, da bodo intervencijske zaloge koruze v prihodnje še naprej naraščale iz naslednjih razlogov:
The Commission expects the intervention stocks of maize to keep growing in the future because
· s pristopom Romunije in Bolgarije sta se EU pridružili veliki pridelovalki koruze z bistveno nižjimi notranjimi cenami od intervencijskih in slabo razvito infrastrukturo;
· with the accession of Romania and Bulgaria, two major maize producers join the EU, with significantly lower internal prices than the intervention price and with a less-developed infrastructure;
· notranja prodaja je omejena zaradi visokih stroškov prevoza med območji EU s presežki in tistimi s primanjkljajem;
· internal outlets are limited, due to high transport costs between the surplus and deficit areas of the EU;
· zaradi liberalizacije trgovine se povečuje mednarodna konkurenca.
· the liberalisation of trade increases international competition;
Predlog temelji na predpostavki, da bi lahko do leta 2013 intervencijske zaloge koruze znašale 15,6 milijona ton, celotne zaloge žit pa bi lahko dosegle 18,9 milijona ton.
The proposal is based on the assumption, therefore, that, by 2013, the intervention stocks of maize could amount to 15,6 Mt, while the total stocks of cereals could reach 18,9 Mt.
Komisija predvideva, da bi ob umiku koruze iz intervencijskega sistema celotne zaloge žit leta 2013 znašale samo 10 milijonov ton.
In the event of the removal of maize from intervention, the Commission anticipates that the total stocks of cereals would amount to only 10 Mt that year.
Hkrati predlog navaja, da bi srednjeevropske regije pridelovalke koruze ponovno postale konkurenčne, nižje cene pa bi spodbudile konkurenčnost tudi v sektorjih prašičereje in perutnine.
Meanwhile, as the proposal suggests, the maize-producing Central European regions would regain their competitiveness and lower prices would also help to boost the competitiveness of the pig and poultry sector.
Poročevalec predlaga zavrnitev predloga Komisije iz naslednjih razlogov:
The rapporteur proposes to reject the Commission's proposal on the following grounds:
· predlog krši legitimna pričakovanja pridelovalcev koruze;
· it infringes the legitimate expectations of maize producers;
· predlog ni ustrezno utemeljen s tržnimi podatki;
· it is not justified appropriately by market data;
· v predlogu niso upoštevani morebitni škodljivi učinki umika koruze iz intervencijskega sistema na trg žit.
· it fails to take into consideration the possible negative effects of the removal of maize from intervention on the cereal markets.
Kršitev načela o varstvu legitimnih pričakovanj
Breach of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations
Varstvo legitimnih pričakovanj je temeljni vidik pravne varnosti v zakonodaji Skupnosti.
The protection of legitimate expectations is a fundamental aspect of legal certainty in Community law.
Osnovna ideja pravne varnosti je, da mora biti ljudem omogočeno načrtovanje ravnanja v vednosti o pravnih posledicah njihovih dejanj.
The basic concept behind legal certainty is that people ought to be able to plan their lives secure in the knowledge of the legal consequences of their action.
To v prvi vrsti pomeni, da nobeno pravno dejanje ne sme imeti retroaktivnega učinka.
Firstly, it implies that no legal action should have a retroactive effect.
Poleg tega je zakonodajalec dolžan zagotoviti dovolj časa, da se državljani od datuma objave pravnega instrumenta pripravijo na njegovo izvajanje .
Secondly, legislators are obliged to provide a reasonable time for the citizens to prepare themselves for the application of the legal instrument in question, from the date of its publication.
Ker se koruza izmed vseh žit seje najkasneje, zemljišč, namenjenih koruzi, v danem tržnem letu ni mogoče uporabiti v druge namene.
Since maize is the latest sown cereal, those areas, which have been set aside for maize, cannot be used for other purpose in the given marketing year.
Glede na časovni razpored Sveta in Evropskega parlamenta bo nova uredba o umiku koruze iz intervencijskega sistema objavljena šele maja letos.
In view of the timetable of the Council and the European Parliament, the new regulation on the removal of maize intervention will be published no earlier than May this year.
Ker Komisija hoče, da se ta predlog začne uporabljati s tržnim letom 2007/2008, bi bila s tem kršena legitimna pričakovanja pridelovalcev in drugih zainteresiranih strani.
Since the Commission wants the current proposal to be applied from the 2007/08 marketing year, it would infringe the legitimate expectations of producers and other stakeholders.
Vendar Komisija trdi, da se "koruza seje samo spomladi.
The Commission claims, however, that "maize sowing is carried out only in spring.
Čas tega predloga je torej povsem primeren, da se lahko kmetje odločijo ..."
The timing of this proposal is therefore fully appropriate for farmers...".
Glede na navedena dejstva se poročevalec ne more strinjati s to utemeljitvijo.
Considering the abovementioned facts, the rapporteur cannot accept this argument.
Komisija se ne more zagovarjati, da je bil predlog objavljen lanskega decembra.
The Commission cannot defend itself with the argument, that the proposal was published last December.
Objava predloga je samo prvi korak v zakonodajnem postopku in sama objava predloga pravno nikakor ne zavezuje državljanov.
The publication of a proposal is only the first step in the legislative process and citizens are in no way legally bound by the mere publication of a proposal.
Če bi zakonodaja Skupnosti objavi predloga Komisije in sprejetemu pravnemu instrumentu pripisovala enak pravni učinek, bi bila s tem razveljavljena zakonodajna pristojnost Sveta in Evropskega parlamenta.
Had Community law attributed the same legal effects to the publication of a Commission's proposal as to that of an adopted legal instrument, it would have annulled the legislative power of the Council and the European Parliament!
Pri rži, ki je bila iz intervencijskega sistema umaknjena z reformo skupne kmetijske politike leta 2003, je zakonodajalec dal pridelovalcem eno leto časa za potrebne odločitve, preden je začela veljati nova uredba.
Taking the example of rye, which was excluded from the intervention system during the 2003 CAP reform, the legislator allowed one year for the producers to take the necessary decisions before the entry into force of the new regulation.
Nova skupna ureditev trga za žita, s katero je bila odpravljena intervencija za rž, je bila objavljena oktobra 2003, uporabljati pa se je začela s tržnim letom 2004/2005.
The new CMO in cereals, which abolished intervention for rye, had been published in October 2003, but was applied only from the 2004/05 marketing year.
Neutemeljene ocene trga
Unfounded market estimations
Komisija je pri svoji izračunih uporabila podatke iz samo dveh tržnih let (2004/2005 in 2005/2006).
The Commission based its calculations on the data of only two marketing years (2004/05 and 2005/06).
Poleg tega je bila v tržnem letu 2004/2005 rekordna letina koruze, največja v Evropi v zadnjih letih, zato so bile tržne cene na notranjem in svetovnem trgu nizke.
Furthermore, the 2004/05 marketing year witnessed a record harvest in maize, the highest in Europe for many years and as a consequence of it, low market prices in the internal as well as in the world markets.
Poročevalec je trdno prepričan, da dveletno obdobje ni dovolj, da bi lahko sklepali o dolgoročnih razmerah na trgu.
The rapporteur firmly believes, that this two-year period is not sufficiently long in order to allow us to draw conclusions regarding the long-term situation of the market.
Komisija ne upošteva trenutnih trendov na trgu.
The Commission fails to take into consideration the current market trends.
Po ocenah se bodo intervencijske zaloge koruze povečale s 5,8 milijona ton leta 2005 na 9 milijonov ton leta 2006.
It is estimated that the intervention stocks of maize would grow from 5,8 Mt in 2005 to 9,0 Mt in 2006.
Pridelovalci leta 2006 za intervencijo pravzaprav niso ponudili znatnih količin koruze.
In fact, the producers did not offer any significant quantity of maize for intervention in 2006.
Zaradi razmeroma visokih cen in podpovprečne letine se je raven intervencijskih zalog do konca leta 2006 celo znižala na 4,28 milijona ton.
Due to relatively high prices and the lower than average harvest, the level of intervention stocks had even dropped to 4,28 Mt by the end of 2006.
Glede na to, da izračuni Komisije temeljijo na domnevi, da se bodo intervencijske zaloge v prihodnje povečevale linearno, se zdi neutemeljen glavni argument predloga, in sicer da intervencija koruze ni trajnostna in da bo privedla do velikih zalog.
Considering that the Commission's calculations are based on the assumption that intervention stocks will grow in a linear way in the future, the main argument of the proposal, namely, that maize intervention is unsustainable and will lead to large stocks, appears to be based unjustified.
Sedanje tržne cene za koruzo se gibljejo okrog 120 EUR na tono, kar je bistveno več od intervencijske cene (101,31 EUR na tono).
The current market prices of maize are around 120 euro/t, which is significantly higher than the intervention price (101,31 euro/t).
Pri takih cenah Skupnost lahko prodaja intervencijske zaloge brez velike finančne izgube, tudi ob upoštevanju stroškov za javno skladiščenje.
These prices allow the Community to sell the intervention stocks without considerable financial loss, even taking into account the costs of public storage.
Komisijine ocene trga ne podpira niti dolgoročno dogajanje na trgu.
The Commission's market assessment is not supported by long-term market developments either.
Komisija sama v drugi publikaciji navaja, da je "za razliko od pšenice, svetovna poraba koruze naraščala s stalnim in razmeroma močnim tempom skoraj dveh odstotkov v obdobju 1980 – 2002"
The Commission itself states in another publication, that "unlike wheat, world maize consumption has grown at a consistent and relatively robust pace of almost 2% from 1980-2002"
Poraba koruze v EU je rasla še hitreje, in sicer s 3,7 odstotka na leto.
The EU's maize consumption has experienced an even stronger growth of 3,7% per year.
Po ocenah glavnih mednarodnih institucij (FAO, OECD, FAPRI) se bodo ti tržni trendi očitno nadaljevali tudi v bližnji prihodnosti.
According to the main international institutions (FAO, OECD, FAPRI), these market trends seem to continue in the near future.
FAPRI v svoji tržni analizi
In its market analysis
Raziskovalni inštitut za kmetijsko in prehrambeno politiko: Agricultural Outlook 2006 predvideva zviševanje cen in zmanjševanje zalog v naslednjem desetletju.
Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute: Agricultural Outlook 2006 , FAPRI forecasts increasing prices and falling stocks for the next decade.
Številke kažejo, da pridelava ne bo mogla dohitevati rasti porabe.
These figures indicate that production will not be able to keep pace with consumption growth.
Naraščanje povpraševanja po koruzi lahko razložimo z naslednjima dejstvoma:
The growing demand for maize can be explained by two reasons:
· porabo koruze lahko spodbudi tudi razcvet industrije bioetanola.
· maize consumption could be fuelled by the booming bioethanol-industry.
Proizvodnja biogoriv je lahko pomemben trg za koruzo tudi v regijah EU s presežkom.
The production of biofuels could be an important outlet for maize even in the surplus regions of the EU.
Vpliv na trg za žita
Effects on the cereal markets
Intervencije koruze ni mogoče odpraviti, ne da bi pri tem upoštevali možne učinke na trg za žita, saj je koruza, za razliko od rži, nadomestni pridelek za krmno pšenico in ječmen.
The intervention of maize could not be abolished without taking into consideration the possible effects on the cereal markets, since, unlike rye, maize is a substitute product for feed wheat and barley.
Eden glavnih ciljev skupne ureditve trga za žita je ohranjanje stabilnosti cen na notranjih trgih.
One of the main purposes of the CMO in cereals is to maintain price stability in the internal markets.
Ob umiku koruze iz intervencijskega sistema bi se pridelovalci soočali z občutnim nihanjem cen.
In the event of the removal of maize from intervention, producers will face considerable price volatility.
V tržnih letih z nadpovprečno letino bi tržne cene padle, hkrati pa bi cene za pšenico in ječmen ostajale blizu intervencijske cene, ki deluje kot varnostna mreža.
In those marketing years, when the harvest is above average, maize market prices will fall, while prices for wheat and barley will remain constantly around the intervention price, which functions as a safety net.
Zaradi bistveno nižjih cen bi bila koruza bolj konkurenčna kot pšenica in ječmen, njune intervencijske zaloge pa bi se povečale.
Due to significantly lower prices, maize will become much more competitive than wheat and barley, and intervention stocks of the latter will grow.
Podatki Komisije potrjujejo to dogajanje na trgu.
Figures from the Commission confirm these market developments.
Glede na projekcije bi se ob umiku koruze iz intervencijskega sistema javne zaloge pšenice in ječmena povečale s približno 5,5 milijona ton leta 2008 na 10 milijonov ton leta 2013.
According to the projections, in the event of the removal of maize from intervention, public stocks of wheat and barley will increase from around 5,5 Mt in 2008 to 10 Mt in 2013.
Glede na vse to je jasno, da bi umik koruze iz intervencijskega sistema, če bi drugi stebri skupne ureditve trga za žita ostali nespremenjeni, povzročil resno neravnovesje na trgu v celotnem sektorju žit.
In conclusion, it is clear, that the removal of maize from intervention, while other building blocks of the CMO in cereals remain unchanged, would lead to serious market imbalances in the entire cereal sector.
Sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/2003 o skupni ureditvi trga za žita
Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals
o sklenitvi skupne izjave o praktičnih ukrepih za postopek soodločanja
on the conclusion of the Joint Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure
PRILOGA: SKUPNA IZJAVA O PRAKTIČNIH UKREPIH ZA POSTOPEK SOODLOČANJA (ČLEN 251 POGODBE O ES) 9
ANNEX: JOINT DECLARATION ON PRACTICAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CODECISION PROCEDURE (ARTICLE 251 OF THE EC TREATY) 10
– ob upoštevanju člena 251 pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,
– having regard to Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije s 5. maja 1999 o skupni izjavi o praktičnih ukrepih za nov postopek soodločanja
– having regard to its resolution of 5 May 1999 on the Joint Declaration on the practical arrangements for the new codecision procedure
UL C 279 1.10.1999, str.
OJ C 279, 1.10.1999, p.
– ob upoštevanju sklepa konference predsednikov z 8. marca 2007,
– having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 8 March 2007,
– ob upoštevanju revidiranega osnutka skupne izjave o praktičnih ukrepih za postopek soodločanja (v nadaljevanju "revidirana izjava"),
– having regard to the draft revised Joint Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the revised Declaration’),
– ob upoštevanju člena 120(1) poslovnika in točke XVIII (4) njegove priloge VI,
– having regard to Rule 120(1) of its Rules of Procedure and to point XVIII(4) of Annex VI of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6‑0142/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0142/2007 ),
A. ker stalno širjenje področja uporabe postopka soodločanja povečuje njegov pomen v postopku sprejemanja zakonodaje EU in vodi k spremembi narave medinstitucionalnih odnosov med Parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo,
A. whereas the continual extension of the scope of application of the codecision procedure increases its importance in the EU law-making process and leads to a change in the nature of interinstitutional relations between Parliament, the Council and the Commission,
B. ker si Parlament, Svet in Komisija prizadevajo, da bi bilo sprejemanje zakonodaje bolj pregledno, usklajeno, učinkovito in demokratično,
B. whereas Parliament, the Council and the Commission have attempted to make EU law-making more transparent, coordinated, efficient and democratic,
C. ker so, čeprav se je skupna izjava o praktičnih ukrepih za postopek soodločanja iz leta 1999 izkazala za koristno, nekatere praktične posledice njene uporabe sčasoma pokazale potrebo po nekaterih spremembah,
C. whereas, whilst the Joint Declaration on practical arrangements of the codecision procedure of 1999 has proven its worth, some practical developments in its application over time have shown the need for it to be amended,
D. ker sta zaporedni širitvi Evropske unije ustvarili izzive, ki vplivajo tako na postopke poenostavitve kakor na optimizacijo virov,
D. whereas the successive enlargements of the EU have created challenges affecting both streamlining procedures and the optimisation of resources,
E. ker revidirana izjava izpolnjuje ta pričakovanja in omogoča, da se prihodnje medinstitucionalno sodelovanje razvije na tvoren in prilagodljiv način,
E. whereas the revised Declaration meets those expectations and allows future interinstitutional cooperation to develop in a constructive and flexible way,
1. ponovno potrjuje svojo zavezanost načelom preglednosti, odgovornosti in učinkovitosti, ter potrebo po osredotočanju na poenostavitev zakonodajnega postopka EU ob spoštovanju pravnega reda Unije;
Reconfirms its commitment to the principles of transparency, accountability and efficiency, and the need to focus on the simplification of the EU law-making process while respecting the legal order of the Union;
3. želi, da Parlament določi način usklajevanja prakse parlamentarnih odborov med trialogi, tako da določi nekatera pravila v zvezi s sestavo parlamentarnih delegacij ter obveznosti glede zaupnosti, povezanih z njihovim delom;
Calls for Parliament to adopt a method harmonising parliamentary committee practices at trilogues by laying down a number of rules concerning the composition of parliamentary delegations and confidentiality obligations in connection with their proceedings;
a) nove določbe glede sodelovanju predstavnikov predsedstva Sveta na sejah parlamentarnih odborov in zahtev za informacije o stališču Sveta, ki skupaj predstavljajo korak proti cilju izboljšanja dialoga med dvema zakonodajnima vejama;
(a) the new provisions concerning the attendance at parliamentary committee meetings by representatives of the Council Presidency and concerning requests for information on the Council's position, which, together, constitute a step towards the objective of improving dialogue between the two legislative branches;
b) priznanje prakse sklenitve sporazumov, doseženih med neformalnimi pogajanji med institucijami, z izmenjavo pisem;
(b) recognition of the practice of finalising agreements reached during informal negotiations between the institutions through an exchange of letters;