natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zato je potrebno sodelovanje med posameznimi zadevnimi institucijami in zdravstvenimi zavarovalnicami, ki mora ohranjati zaupnost občutljivih zdravstvenih podatkov.
Cooperation between the various institutions concerned and the various health insurance schemes is therefore needed and must preserve the confidentiality of sensitive data in medical files.
Bolniki bi morali koristiti pametno evropsko zdravstveno kartico, ki bi veljala za vso Unijo.
Patients should have a European health microchip card that would be standard for the whole EU.
Ob upoštevanju splošnega staranja evropskega prebivalstva in večje nadnacionalne mobilnosti upokojencev je pomembno predvideti oblikovanje zadostnih struktur za ustrezno oskrbo v povezavi z ustreznimi socialnimi storitvami.
In view of the general ageing of the European population and pensioners’ increased transnational mobility, it seems important to anticipate the creation of sufficient structures for appropriate care, in connection with the relevant social services.
Mobilnost izvajalcev zdravstvenega varstva je treba izboljšati, evropska kartica pa mora označevati raznolikost njihove poklicne usposobljenosti za boljšo organizacijo nadnacionalnih sistemov stalnega usposabljanja, ki je zelo priporočljivo za sledenje stalnemu razvoju tehnologij in raziskav.
The mobility of health-care providers should be improved, and there should be a standard European card stating their various professional qualifications, with a view to better organised transnational systems of continuing training, which is highly recommended to keep pace with continuing developments in technologies and research.
Bistveno je, da se oblikuje pravni okvir, ki bo določal odgovornosti v primeru neuspeha zdravljenja ali škode, ki je bila povzročena bolniku, zlasti v okviru zdravstvenega nadzora v več državah.
It is vital to set up a legal framework that determines liabilities in the event of failure of treatment, or injury to patients, particularly in the context of medical treatment carried out in several countries.
Pogoji in postopki nadzora morajo biti jasno določeni, kot so v državah, kjer strokovnjaki delajo.
The conditions and arrangements for monitoring should be clearly set out in the same way as those in the country where the professionals work.
Ti morajo ne glede na višino tveganja, ki so mu izpostavljeni, koristiti zavarovanje po razumni ceni.
Whatever the level of risk they are exposed to in their profession, health-care professionals should have access to reasonably priced insurance.
Treba je tudi opredeliti nekatere pojme: čakalna doba - od države do države se močno razlikuje - nejasna pojma bolnišničnega in izvenbolnišničnega zdravljenja, pojmi, navedeni v sodbah Evropskega sodišča.
Certain concepts should also be defined: reasonable waiting time, which varies greatly from one country to another, and imprecise definitions of inpatient and outpatient treatment, which have been referred to in judgments by the European Court of Justice.
Treba je bolje varovati bolnike, zdravstvene delavce, sisteme zdravstvenega zavarovanja in odpraviti pravno negotovost glede zdravljenj, odobritev, tarif in pogojev za povračilo.
Better protection is urgently needed for patients, health professionals and sickness insurance schemes, and any legal uncertainty about treatments, authorisations, charges and conditions for reimbursement should be removed.
Za racionalizacijo stroškov sistemov zdravstvenega zavarovanja bi bilo primerno poudariti preventivne politike na ravni držav članic.
With a view to rationalising costs for sickness insurance schemes, it would be sensible to stress prevention policies at Member State level.
Na čezmejnih območjih bi medsebojna izmenjava materialnih in človeških virov prispevala k inteligentnemu upravljanju zdravstvenega varstva.
In border areas, sharing human and material resources would contribute to the intelligent management of health care.
Da bi izboljšali pogoje za raziskovanje posebnih in redkih bolezni, bi bilo primerno v vsaki državi vzpostaviti referenčni center kot način za izboljšanje kakovosti zdravstvenega varstva.
To optimise the conditions for research on specific and rare diseases, there should be a general rule to set up reference centres in each country as a way of improving the quality of care.
Sodišče je v svojih sodbah priznalo pravice bolnikov.
The Court of Justice has recognised patients’ rights in its judgments.
Ostaja pa pravna negotovost glede nekaterih opredelitev zdravstvenih storitev, dejanskih pravic bolnikov, pravic zdravstvenih delavcev, ki izvajajo storitve v različnih državah, pogojev izvajanja nadzora, standardov, ki se uporabljajo v smislu tarif in povračil, odgovornosti v primeru škode, ki je bila povzročena bolnikom, zlasti pri zdravstvenem nadzoru v več državah.
Nevertheless, legal uncertainty remains with regard to some definitions of care, the actual rights of patients, the rights of professionals who provide their services in different countries, the conditions for checks to be carried out, the standards applicable in terms of charges and reimbursement, and liability in the event of injury to patients, particularly when medical treatment is provided in more than one country.
Samo zakonodajalec, ker je to njegova vloga, mora odpraviti vse obstoječe pravne negotovosti z vzpostavitvijo zakonodajnega instrumenta, ki bo predvidel težave, ki se pojavljajo s povečevanjem trgovine z zdravstvenimi storitvami v Uniji; instrument bi mora pojasniti pravila na področju odobritev in povračil ter v nekaterih primerih povezati zdravstveno in socialno področje.
15.The legislator, and the legislator alone because this is its role, must therefore remove all these persistent legal uncertainties by creating a legislative instrument that anticipates the problems raised by in increase in trade in health-care services within the EU; this instrument should set out all the legal provisions applicable in the context of the diversity of cases to be treated, clarify the rules on authorisations and reimbursement and link the medical area with the social area in some cases.
To pojasnilo pa ne sme spodbuditi bolnikov k prakticiranju "zdravstvenega turizma".
This necessary clarification must, however, not encourage patients to indulge in ‘medical tourism’.
Ta zakonodajna pobuda, ki naj bi oblikovala skladne in učinkovite odgovore na pozive k varovanju načina življenja evropskih državljanov, bi dejansko bila edino pravno in etično jamstvo modela družbe.
This legislative initiative, which would provide coherent and effective responses to calls to protect the way of life of European citizens, would in fact be the only legal and ethical guarantor of a social model.
Direktiva o zdravstvenih storitvah (hkrati z zakonodajo o socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena), ki je vključena v cilj okvirne direktive o storitvah splošnega gospodarskega pomena, je edino orodje, ki bi Evropski uniji omogočalo ustvarjanje dodane vrednosti, ki je potrebna za ponovno vzpostavitev in povečanje zaupanja evropskih državljanov na področju, ki je za njihovo življenje bistvenega pomena.
A directive on health services, in parallel with legislation on general interest social services, included in the objective of a framework directive on services of general economic interest therefore seems to be the only instrument that would enable the European Union to add value, which is what is needed to re-establish and increase the confidence of European citizens in an area which is absolutely central to their lives.
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker je v svojih sklepih z dne 1. in 2. junija 2006 Svet sprejel izjavo petindvajsetih ministrov za zdravje Evropske unije o skupnih vrednotah in načelih zdravstvenih sistemov Evropske Unije
A. whereas, in its conclusions of 1 to 2 June 2006, the Council adopted a statement by the 25 Health Ministers of the European Union about the common values and principles that underpin Europe’s health systems
1. poudarja, da so zdravstvene storitve bistveni del evropskega socialnega modela in pomembno prispevajo k socialni in ozemeljski koheziji, ter poudarja , da je treba še naprej zagotavljati osnovne vrednote, kot so enakopraven dostop, univerzalnost, enako obravnavanje in solidarnost, kakor tudi dostopnost in finančno trajnost;
Stresses that health services constitute a major component of the European social model and make an important contribution to social and territorial cohesion, and points out that the basic values of equality of access, universality, equal treatment and solidarity as well as affordability and financial sustainability must continue to be safeguarded;
3. ugotavlja, da čeprav sistemi zdravstvenega varstva ne sodijo v pristojnost Skupnosti, imajo vprašanja, povezana s sistemi zdravstvenega varstva, kot so dostop do zdravil in zdravljenja, podatki o bolniku ter pretok zavarovalniških družb in zdravstvenih delavcev, čezmejni značaj; ugotavlja, da bi morala ta vprašanja reševati Evropska unija;
Notes that whilst health-care systems are not within the competence of the Community, issues relating to health-care systems, such as access to medicines and treatments, patient information, and the movement of insurance companies and health professionals, have a cross-border character; notes that those issues need to be addressed by the European Union;
13. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi tehnične standarde in poziva vlade držav članic, da aktivno podprejo uvedbo medsebojno združljivih informacijskih sistemov, ki bodo omogočili učinkovito izmenjavo in souporabo zdravstvenih podatkov med ponudniki zdravstvenih storitev v posameznih državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission to draw up technical standards, and calls on the Member State governments to support actively the introduction of mutually compatible information systems allowing the effective exchange and sharing of health information between health-care providers in individual Member States;
15. zagovarja razvoj celovitih postopkov za ocenjevanje zdravstvene politike na nacionalni in evropski ravni ter zahteva okrepljeno dopolnilno, preventivno in socialno medicino za izboljšanje načinov beleženja ter odpravljanje vzrokov bolezni ob upoštevanju socialnega okolja;
Advocates the development of comprehensive assessment procedures for health policy at national and European level and calls for the provision of complementary, preventive and social medicine to be enhanced so as to improve the means of recording and combating the causes of illness taking into account the social environment;
18. ponavlja pomen zmožnosti vodenja držav članic in zakonodajno odgovornost na področju zdravstvenega varstva in svobode držav članic, da ohranijo ali določijo instrumente, kot so načrtovanje, mehanizme za določanje tarif in sisteme dovoljenj, da se tako zagotovi univerzalni dostop do visokokakovostnega zdravstvenega varstva in stalnost; meni, da če države članice uporabljajo te instrumente za varovanje skupnih vrednot in načel, ki podpirajo zdravstveni sistem držav članic, in za doseganje ciljev splošnega pomena ter za ponovno vzpostavitev obstoječih tržnih nepopolnosti, je treba nanje gledati, kot da so utemeljeni s pomembnimi razlogi, ki so javnega pomena;
Reiterates the importance of Member States’ steering capacity and regulatory responsibilities in the field of health care and the freedom of Member States to maintain or set up instruments such as planning, tariff-setting mechanisms and authorisation schemes in order to ensure universal access to high-quality health care as well as continuity; considers that if those instruments are used by Member States to safeguard the common values and principles that underpin Member States’ health systems, to achieve general interest objectives, and to redress the existing market imperfections, they are to be regarded as justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest;
20. poudarja, da je sodna praksa Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti o zdravstvenih storitvah zelo celovita, zlasti glede povračila stroškov zdravljenja ter da mora omejena in osredotočena zakonodaja ES o zdravstvenih storitvah in čezmejnem zdravstvenem varstvu pojasniti tudi okoliščine, v katerih imajo bolniki pravico zahtevati povračila za zdravstveno oskrbo v drugi državi članici v okviru sistema socialne varnosti države članice, kjer so vključeni v ta sistem, v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti ter na način, ki je skladen z Uredbo (ES) št. 883/04 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti
Points out that the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities relating to health services is comprehensive, particularly with regard to the reimbursement of treatment costs, and that limited and focused EC legislation on health services and cross-border health care should clarify the circumstances under which patients are entitled to claim reimbursement for medical care in another Member State under the social security system of the Member State of affiliation in accordance with the Court’s case law and in a way that is consistent with Regulation (EC) No 883/04 on the coordination of social security systems
22. opozarja, da mora biti prednostni instrument za ukrep na področju zdravstvenih storitev sodelovanje med državami članicami, s predpisano stopnjo usklajevanja s strani Komisije;
Points out that the priority instrument for action relating to health services should be cooperation between the Member States, with the requisite degree of coordination by the Commission;
26. meni, da mora biti vsak ukrep Skupnosti, povezan z zdravstvenimi storitvami, skladen z ukrepom Skupnosti, ki se nanaša na socialne storitve splošnega interesa;
Is of the opinion that any Community action relating to health-care services should be consistent with Community action relating to social services of general interest;
31. meni, da je za hiter odgovor na potrebe Evropejcev, ki potujejo in iščejo visokokakovostne zdravstvene storitve, bistvenega pomena povečano sodelovanje regionalnih zdravstvenih sistemov, ki so bolj primerni za iskanje prikladnih, regionalnih rešitev za potrebe prebivalstva, in meni, da se je treba osredotočiti zlasti na izkušnje in dobre prakse, ki so bile pridobljene v obmejnih in euroregijah;
Considers that, in order to respond speedily to the needs of Europeans travelling to seek high-quality health services, the priority should be to step up the involvement of regional health systems, which are probably better suited to finding appropriate, regionally based solutions to the population’s needs, and to focus in particular on the experience and good practice which have been built up in border regions and in the Euro-regions;
37. ugotavlja, da čeprav v Evropi obstaja obojestransko priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij, pa še nimamo zadostnega poenotenja kakovosti vsebine strokovnega usposabljanja in načinov, na katere se poklici opravljajo in/ali nezadostne skrbi za takšno poenotenje;
Notes that although mutual recognition of professional qualifications exists in Europe, there remains insufficient uniformity of quality of the content of professional training and of the ways in which professions are pursued and/or insufficient provision for such uniformity;
Vpliv in posledice izključitve zdravstvenih storitev iz direktive o storitvah na notranjem trgu
Impact and consequences of the exclusion of health services from the Directive on services in the internal market
o učinku in posledicah izključitve zdravstvenih storitev iz direktive o storitvah na notranjem trgu
on the impact and consequences of the exclusion of health services from the Directive on services in the internal market
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Izjava ministrov za zdravje EU o skupnih vrednotah in načelih – Luxembourg, 1.-2. junij 2006. ; opozarja, da je bilo zdravstveno varstvo izključeno iz obsega uporabe direktive o storitvah, ker ni kot druge storitve in zahteva posebne zaščitne ukrepe, ki zagotavljajo, da ima vsakdo omogočen dostop do visoko kakovostne zdravstvene oskrbe, in ker to terja politične odločitve na evropski, nacionalni in regionalni ravni;
EU Health Ministers statement on common values and principles – Luxembourg, 1-2 June 2006. ; recalls that health care was excluded from the scope of the services directive because it is not like other services and requires special safeguards to ensure that everyone is able to access high-quality health care, and because it entails political choices at European, national and regional level;
3. meni, da je treba zagotoviti pravico do povrnitve stroškov zdravljenja v drugi državi članici za bolezni, ki niso akutne, če so čakalni seznami v bolnikovi državi članici dolgi ali če je kakovost zdravljenja slabša kot v drugi državi članici, pod pogojem, da imata zadevni državi članici sklenjen sporazum; meni tudi, da je izvajanje pritiska na bolnike, da bi sprejeli cenejše zdravljenje v drugi državi, nesprejemljivo;
Considers that the right to reimbursement of costs of treatment in another Member State of a disease which is not acute should be guaranteed if there are long waiting lists in the patient’s own Member State or the quality of treatment there is inferior to that in other Member States subject to mutual agreement between the Member States concerned; also considers that it is not permissible to bring pressure to bear on patients to undergo cheaper treatment in another country;
9. poudarja, da je treba razlikovati med čezmejnimi zdravstvenimi storitvami, tj. tistimi, ki so na obeh straneh skupne meje med dvema državama članicama, zato da ohranjajo in nudijo bolnikom visoko raven dostopa in zdravstvene nege, ter mednarodnimi zdravstvenimi storitvami v Evropski uniji, ki lahko nudijo zdravljenje v primeru redkih bolezni ali »bolezni sirot«, ki zahtevajo uporabo redkih in zelo dragih tehnologij (referenčni zdravstveni centri) ali ki nudijo dostop do nege, ki je njihova država članica ali država stalnega prebivališča takrat ne more nuditi;
Stresses that it is desirable to distinguish between, on the one hand, cross-border health services, meaning those which are situated on either side of a border common to two Member States in order to maintain and offer patients a high standard of access and care, and, on the other hand, international health services within the European Union, which must offer health care for the treatment of rare or orphan diseases and/or diseases which require rare and very expensive technologies (care reference centres) or provide access to care which their Member State or State of residence cannot at present offer them;
11. poudarja, da manjkajo določbe za jamstvo bolnikom in nacionalnim organom dostopa do informacij o zagotavljanju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva, o akreditiranih zdravstvenih delavcih in zdravstveni negi;
Points out that provisions for ensuring access to information for patients and national authorities on cross-border health-care provision, accredited health-care professionals and medical treatment are lacking;
Vpliv in posledice izključitve zdravstvenih storitev iz direktive o storitvah na notranjem trgu
The impact and consequences of the exclusion of health services from the Directive on services in the internal market
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2000/60/ES o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike, kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/60/EC establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0921 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0921 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 175(1) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0032/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0032/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0174/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0174/2007 ),
Ukrepi Skupnosti na področju vodne politike (Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila)
Community action in the field of water policy (implementing powers conferred on the Commission)
o uporabi solidarnostnega sklada EU v skladu s točko 26 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma s 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund according to point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2007)0149 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0149 ),
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma s 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
– ob upoštevanju uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z 10. oktobra 2002 glede predloga uredbe Sveta o ustanovitvi solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije
– having regard to its position of 10 October 2002 on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
– ob upoštevanju rezultatov tristranskih pogovorov z 18. aprila 2007,
– having regard to the results of the Trialogue of 18 April 2007,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6-0175/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0175/2007 ),
A. ker je Evropska unija vzpostavila ustrezne institucionalne in proračunske instrumente, da bi zagotovila finančno pomoč za škodo, ki so jo povzročile velike naravne nesreče,
A. whereas the European Union has set up the appropriate institutional and budgetary instruments to provide financial assistance in relation to damage resulting from major natural disasters,
B. ker sta Madžarska in Grčija zaprosili za pomoč za škodo, ki so jo povzročile poplave med marcem in aprilom leta 2006,
B. whereas Hungary and Greece have requested assistance in relation to the damage resulting from the floods between March and April 2006,
C. ker bi morala biti finančna pomoč Evropske unije državam članicam, ki so jih prizadele naravne nesreče, na voljo čim hitreje in čim učinkoviteje,
C. whereas the European Union's financial assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters should be made available as quickly and efficiently as possible,
EVROPSKI PARLAMENT IN SVET EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI,
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
UL C 139, 14.6.2006, str.
OJ C 139, 14.06.2006, p.