natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(10) To ne vpliva na sisteme odgovornosti ponudnikov internetnih storitev, predvidenih v Direktivi 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o določenih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja, na notranjem trgu 1 .
(10) This Directive does not affect specific liability systems such as that laid down for Internet service providers by Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce , in the Internal Market 1 .
1 UL L 178, 17.7.2000, str.
1 OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p.
(10a) Ta direktiva ne vpliva na sisteme odgovornosti ponudnikov internetnih storitev, predvidene v Direktiva 2001/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2001 o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi 1 .
(10a) This Directive does not affect specific liability systems such as that laid down by Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society 1 .
1 UL L 167, 22.6.2001, str.
1 OJ L 167, 22.6.2001, p.
Direktiva 98/84/ES je trenutno edina zaščita, ki je vzpostavljena na evropski ravni za varovanje audio-vizualnih pravic pred rastočo nevarnostjo piratstva in ponarejanja.
Directive 98/84/EC is currently the only protection established at European level to safeguard audiovisual rights against the growing threat of piracy and counterfeiting.
Tako zaščito nudi zlasti pogojni dostop, ali drugače, s tehnični ukrepi za nadzorovanje uporabe audio-vizualnih vsebin, ki so predvajane v kodirani obliki.
Such protection is provided chiefly by means of conditional access, in other words technical measures to control the use of audiovisual content transmitted in encoded form.
Prenos kršitev pogojnega dostopa v področje uporabe te direktive (z vključitvijo sklicevanja na direktivo 98/84/ES), bil imelo pomembne odvračilne učinke za kriminalne združbe, ki se trenutno zanašajo na razlike med predpisi, ki veljajo v različnih državah članicah, in ki jim omogočajo, da nekaznovano kršijo audio-vizualne pravice.
Bringing infringements of conditional access within the scope of this directive by including a reference to Directive 98/84/EC would be a significant deterrent for criminal organisations which currently rely on the discrepancies between the rules applied in the various Member States enabling them to infringe audiovisual rights with impunity.
Ta direktiva določa kazenske ukrepe, potrebne za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine.
This Directive lays down the criminal measures necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights.
Ta direktiva določa kazenske ukrepe, potrebne za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine kot so opredeljene v nadaljevanju , v zvezi s ponarejanjem in piratstvom .
This Directive lays down the criminal measures necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights , as defined below in the context of counterfeiting and piracy.
Najboljši način, da se doseže cilje iz predloga je, da se obravnavana direktiva osredotoča izrecno na ponarejanje in piratstvo.
The goals of the proposals will be best achieved if the directive expressly focuses on counterfeiting and piracy.
Sedanja formulacija bi namreč lahko kriminalizirala spore o pravicah intelektualne lastnine, ki so večinoma civilne narave in ki nastanejo med zakonitimi gospodarskimi družbami.
Its current wording could indeed criminalize IPR disputes that are essentially of a civil nature and occur between legitimate commercial enterprises.
Namen tega predloga spremembe je natančneje določiti področje uporabe direktive, s sklicevanjem na opredelitve v prihodnjem predlogu spremembe.
The amendment seeks to establish more precisely the scope of the directive by referring to the definitions in a subsequent amendment.
Ti ukrepi se uporabljajo za pravice intelektualne lastnine, predvidene v pravu Skupnosti in/ali nacionalnem pravu držav članic.
These measures shall apply to intellectual property rights provided for in Community legislation and/or national legislation in the Member States .
Ti ukrepi se uporabljajo za pravice intelektualne lastnine, predvidene v pravu Skupnosti, razen za patente .
These measures shall apply to intellectual property rights , other than patents, provided for in Community legislation.
Cilj predloga spremembe je že od začetka omejiti področje uporabe direktive.
This amendment seeks to delimit the scope of the directive from the outset.
Določbe te direktive se ne uporabljajo za pravice intelektualne lastnine, ki izhajajo iz patentov.
Commercial rights under a patent shall be excluded from the provisions of this Directive.
Za boljšo, preglednejšo in lažje razumljivo zakonodajo, je treba natančneje opredeliti materialno področje uporabe direktive.
The substantive scope of the directive needs to be spelt out more exactly so as conform to the goal of better, more transparent, and more comprehensible law-making.
Glede na zapletenost večine raziskovalnih projektov, izumitelji pri svojem delu stalno tvegajo, da kršijo patentne pravice.
Given that most research projects are highly complex, inventors are constantly exposed, when carrying out their work, to the risk of infringing patent rights.
Predvideti kazenske sankcije za kršitev patentne pravice bi lahko odvrnilo izumitelje in univerzitetne raziskovalce od sprejemanja inovativnih odločitev.
Treating patent infringements as criminal offences could deter inventors and academics from developing innovations.
Še posebej se ta direktiva ne uporablja za morebitne kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine, ki so povezane:
In particular, this Directive does not apply to any infringement of an intellectual property right related to:
- s patenti, uporabnimi modeli in dodatnimi varstvenimi certifikati;
- patents, utility models and supplementary protection certificates;
- z vzporednim uvozom izvirnega blaga, ki se trži s privolitvijo imetnika pravice v tretji državi.
- parallel importation of original goods, which have been marketed with the agreement of the right-holder in a third country.
Področje uporabe te direktive je treba omejiti.
The scope of this directive needs to be limited.
Člen 2, naslov
Article 2, title
Treba je opredeliti pojem ponarejanja, ki je temeljnega pomena za ta predlog direktive.
It is desirable for the concept of counterfeiting, which is crucial for the application of this proposal for a directive, to be defined.
Izvajanje sankcij je možno le, če obstaja jasna opredelitev pojma ponarejanja, ki mora vsebovati vse oblike kršitev prava intelektualne lastnine, vključno s posedovanjem ponarejenega blaga.
Penalties can be applied only if there is a clear definition of the concept of counterfeiting, which has to cover all types of infringement of intellectual property rights, including holding counterfeit goods.
Za namene te direktive „pravna oseba“ pomeni kateri koli pravni subjekt, ki ima tak status po veljavnem nacionalnem pravu, razen držav in drugih javnih organov, ki imajo javna pooblastila, ter javnih mednarodnih organizacij.
For the purposes of this Directive , “legal person” means any legal entity having such status under the applicable national law, except for States or any other public bodies acting in the exercise of their prerogative of public power, as well as public international organisations.
Za namene te direktive:
For the purposes of this Directive :
(a) "pravica intelektualne lastnine" pomeni eno ali več od naslednjih pravic:
(a) “intellectual property rights” means one or more of the following rights:
- avtorski sorodne pravice,
- rights related to copyright,
- pravica sui generis ustvarjalca podatkovne baze,
- sui generis right of a database maker,
- pravice ustvarjalca topografije polprevodnega proizvoda,
- rights of the creator of the topographies of a semiconductor product,
- pravice blagovnih znamk, kolikor razširitev kazenskopravne zaščite nanje ni v nasprotju s pravili prostega trga in raziskovalnimi dejavnostmi,
- trademark rights, in so far as extending to them the protection of criminal law is not inimical to free market rules and research activities,
- pravice modela,
- design rights,
- geografske označbe,
- geographical indications,
- trgovska imena, kolikor jih zadevna nacionalna zakonodaja ščiti kot izključne pravice lastnine,
- trade names, in so far as these are protected as exclusive property rights in the national law concerned,
- v vsakem primeru pravice, če so določene na ravni Skupnosti, ki zadevajo dobrine iz člena 2(1)(a) in (b) uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1383/2003 z dne 22. julija 2003, ki se nanaša na carinske ukrepe proti blagu, za katerega se sumi, da krši določene pravice intelektualne lastnine, in na ukrepe proti blagu, za katerega se izkaže, da je kršilo te pravice 1, v nobenem primeru pa ne patentne pravice;
- and in any event the rights, in so far as provision is made for them at Community level, in respect of goods within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) and (b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 of 22 July 2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be taken against goods found to have infringed such rights 1 , and in any event with the exclusion of patents;
(b) "kršitve v trgovinsko pomembnem obsegu" pomeni vsako kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine, storjeno za pridobitev komercialne koristi; to bi izključevalo dejanja, ki jih storijo zasebni uporabniki za osebne in neprofitne namene;
(b) “infringements on a commercial scale” means any infringement of an intellectual property right committed to obtain a commercial advantage; this would exclude acts carried out by private users for personal and not for profit purposes;
(c) "namerne kršitve pravice intelektualne lastnine" pomeni premišljeno in namerno kršenje zadevne pravice za pridobitev ekonomske koristi v trgovinsko pomembnem obsegu;
(c) “intentional infringements of an intellectual property right” means deliberate and conscious infringement of the right concerned for the purpose of obtaining an economic advantage on a commercial scale;
(d) „pravna oseba“ pomeni kateri koli pravni subjekt, ki ima tak status po veljavnem nacionalnem pravu, razen držav in drugih javnih organov, ki imajo javna pooblastila, ter javnih mednarodnih organizacij.
(d) “legal person” means any legal entity having such status under the applicable national law, except for States or any other public bodies acting in the exercise of their prerogative of public power, as well as public international organisations.
1 UL L 196, 2.8.2003, str.
1 OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, p.
Države članice zagotovijo, da opredelijo kot kaznivo dejanje katero koli namerno kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine, storjeno na področju trgovine, pa tudi poskus take kršitve , pomoč oziroma podporo in spodbujanje k taki kršitvi .
Member States shall ensure that all intentional infringements of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale, and attempting, aiding or abetting and inciting such infringements , are treated as criminal offences.
Države članice zagotovijo, da opredelijo kot kaznivo dejanje katero koli namerno kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine, storjeno na področju trgovine, pa tudi pomoč oziroma podporo in spodbujanje same kršitve .
Member States shall ensure that all intentional infringements of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale, and aiding or abetting and inciting the actual infringement , are treated as criminal offences.
Kazenske sankcije se ne uporabijo v primerih vzporednega uvoza izvirnega blaga, ki se trži s privolitvijo imetnika pravice v državi zunaj Evropske unije.
Criminal sanctions shall not be applied in cases of parallel importation of original goods which have been marketed with the agreement of the right-holder in a country outside the European Union.
Ni piratstva v primerih vzporednega uvoza izvirnega blaga, ki se trži s privolitvijo imetnika pravice v tretji državi.
Parallel importation of original goods which have been marketed with the agreement of the right-holder in a country outside the EU reveals no pirating.
Države članice zagotovijo, da ustrezna uporaba zaščitenega dela, vključno s ponovno proizvodnjo v več izvodih ali v zvočni obliki ali na kakršen koli drug način, za namene kritike, recenzije, informiranja, poučevanja (vključno s ponovno proizvodnjo v več izvodih za predvajanje v učilnicah), preučevanja ali raziskovanja, ni kaznivo dejanje.
Member States shall ensure that the fair use of a protected work, including such use by reproduction in copies or audio or by any other means, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship or research, does not constitute a criminal offence.
Svoboda tiska mora biti zaščitena s kazenskimi ukrepi.
The freedom of the press needs protection from criminal measures.
Strokovnjaki, kot so novinarji, znanstveniki in učitelji, niso zločinci, in časopisi, raziskovalni zavodi in šole niso hudodelske organizacije.
Professionals like journalists, scientists and schoolteachers are not criminals.
Ta ukrep pa ne posega v varovanje pravic, v kolikor je mogoče povračilo civilne škode.
Newspapers, research institutions and schools are not criminal organisations.
a) uničenje premoženja, ki je povzročilo kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine;
(a) destruction of the goods infringing an intellectual property right;
a) uničenje premoženja, vključno z materialom in opremo, ki so bili uporabljeni za kršitev pravice intelektualne lastnine;
(a) destruction of the goods , including materials or equipment used for infringing an intellectual property right;
Namen predloga spremembe je uslkaditi člen 4, 2. odstavek, točko a) predloga direktive s členom 10 direktive o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine.
This amendment will bring Article 4(2)(a) of the proposal for a directive into line with Article 10 of the Enforcement Directive.
Člen 4, odstavek 2, točka b)
Article 4, paragraph 2, point (b)
b) celotno ali delno, trajno ali začasno zaprtje obrata, s katerim je bila pretežno storjena zadevna kršitev;
(b) total or partial closure, on a permanent or temporary basis, of the establishment used primarily to commit the offence;
b) celotno ali delno, trajno ali začasno zaprtje obrata, s katerim je bila storjena zadevna kršitev;
(b) total or partial closure, on a permanent or temporary basis, of the establishment used to commit the offence;
Vsi obrati, s katerimi je bila storjena kršitev, morajo biti predmet enakih sankcij.
All establishments used to commit an offence should be subject to the same range of penalties.
Člen 4, odstavek 2, točka ga (novo)
Article 4, paragraph 2, point (g a) (new)
ga) nalog, s katerim se od kršitelja se zahteva plačilo stroškov za hrambo zaplenjenega blaga.
(ga) an order requiring the infringer to pay the costs of keeping seized goods.
Treba je poskrbeti tudi za dodatno sankcijo in sicer, da je ponarejevalec lahko obsojen na povračilo stroškov skladiščenja blaga za potrebe preiskave, toliko bolj, ker so ti stroški lahko visoki, tudi ko gre za majhne količine, če so proizvodi prostorninsko obsežni, preiskave pa dolgotrajne.
As an additional penalty, it must be possible for the counterfeiter to be required to pay the costs of guarding the goods retained for the purposes of the investigation, especially since such costs can be substantial if the products retained, even in limited numbers, are bulky and the investigation is lengthy.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za zagotovitev, da se fizične osebe, ki so odgovorne za kazniva dejanja iz člena 3, kaznujejo z najvišjo kaznijo najmanj 4 let zapora, če so ta kazniva dejanja storjena v okviru kriminalne združbe v smislu Okvirnega sklepa … o boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu, pa tudi če ta kazniva dejanja pomenijo tveganje za zdravje ali varnost ljudi.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, when committed by natural persons, the offences referred to in Article 3 are punishable by a maximum sentence of at least four years' imprisonment when committed under the aegis of a criminal organisation within the meaning of Framework Decision …. on the fight against organised crime, or where they carry a health or safety risk.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za zagotovitev, da se fizične osebe, ki so odgovorne za kazniva dejanja iz člena 3, kaznujejo z najvišjo kaznijo najmanj 4 let zapora, če gre za huda kazniva dejanja v smislu člena 3, točke 5 direktive 2005/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o preprečevanju uporabe finančnega sistema za pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma 1 , ali če so ta kazniva dejanja storjena v okviru kriminalne združbe v smislu Okvirnega sklepa … o boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu, ali če ta kazniva dejanja pomenijo tveganje za zdravje ali varnost ljudi.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, when committed by natural persons, the offences referred to in Article 3 are punishable by a maximum sentence of at least four years' imprisonment where they are serious crimes within the meaning of Article 3(5) of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing 1 or are committed under the aegis of a criminal organisation within the meaning of Framework Decision …. on the fight against organised crime, or where they carry a health or safety risk.
1 UL L 309, 25.11.2005, str.
1 OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p.
Ta predlog spremembe upravičuje dejstvo, da številni nacionalni pravni sistemu že sedaj uporabljajo precej stroga merila za zaščito pravic intelektualne lastnine, ne glede na to, ali so zadevna kazniva dejanja storjena v okviru kriminalne združbe.
This amendment is justified in view of the fact that many national legal systems have already adopted very rigorous measures to protect intellectual property rights regardless of whether the offences in question are committed under the aegis of a criminal organisation.
Vsiljevanje pogojevanja strožjih kazni z vključenostjo kriminalne združbe bi lahko preprečilo pravilno izvrševanje nacionalnih zaščitnih ukrepov.
Making the imposition of the more severe penalties conditional on the involvement of a criminal organisation could prevent national protection measures from being properly enforced.
Člen 5, odstavek 2, točka a)
Article 5, paragraph 2, point (a)
a) znaša najvišja najmanj 100 000 EUR za primere, ki niso najhujši;
(a) to a maximum of at least EUR 100 000 for cases other than the most serious cases ;
a) znaša najvišja najmanj 100 000 EUR za primere, ki niso tisti iz odstavka 1;
(a) to a maximum of at least EUR 100 000 for cases other than those referred to in paragraph 1 ;
Namen tega predloga spremembe je pojasnitev besedila brez spreminjanja njegovega pomena.
The amendment seeks to clarify the text without changing its original meaning.
Da se zagotovi učinkovitost in odvračilni učinek kazni, je nujno, da nacionalni sodni organ upošteva kršitve intelektualne lastnine, da se določi višino kazni za kršitelja.
To make penalties effective and dissuasive, national courts need to take into account intellectual property offences committed in Member States other than the offender’s country of origin, when they determine the level of penalty to be imposed.
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, ki jim omogočijo celotno ali delno zaplembo premoženja fizične ali pravne osebe, ki je obsojena v skladu z določbami iz člena 3 Okvirnega sklepa 2005/212/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o zaplembi premoženjske koristi, pripomočkov in premoženja, ki so povezani s kaznivimi dejanji, vsaj če so bila ta kazniva dejanja storjena v okviru kriminalne združbe v smislu Okvirnega sklepa … o boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu, pa tudi če ta kazniva dejanja pomenijo tveganje za zdravje ali varnost ljudi.
The Member States shall take the necessary measures to allow the total or partial confiscation of goods belonging to convicted natural or legal persons in accordance with Article 3 of Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property, at least where the offences are committed under the aegis of a criminal organisation, within the meaning of Framework Decision …. on the fight against organised crime, or where they carry a health or safety risk.
Države članice sprejmejo kazenske, civilne in postopkovne ukrepe za zagotovitev prepovedi in kaznivosti zlorab grožnje s kazenskimi sankcijami.
Member States shall ensure that, through criminal, civil and procedural measures, the misuse of threats of criminal sanctions is prohibited and made subject to penalties.
Države članice prepovedujejo zlorabe postopka, zlasti če se kazenske sankcije uporabi za izvršitev civilnih določb.
Member States shall prohibit procedural misuse, especially where criminal measures are employed for the enforcement of the requirements of civil law.
Možnosti imetnika pravice, da odvrača morebitne kršitelje (tj. konkurente), se znatno povečajo, če so kršitelji seznanjeni z dejstvom, da ne bodo mogli ubežati kazenskim sankcijam.
The potential for a right-holder to deter potential infringers (i.e., competitors) increases considerably if he can threaten them with criminal penalties.
Preprečitev zlorab pravic intelektualne lastnine je določena tako v mednarodnem kot tudi v evropskem pravu.
Both international and European law require the prevention of misuse of IP rights.
Tovrstne zlorabe škodujejo prosti konkurenci in so v nasprotju s členom 28 in naslednjimi ter s členom 81 in naslednjimi.
Misuse disrupts free competition, in contravention of Art. 28 et seq. and 81 et seq.
Države članice zagotovijo ustrezno varstvo in jamstvo pravic obdolžencev.
Member States shall ensure that the rights of defendants are duly protected and guaranteed.
Skupne preiskovalne enote
Joint investigation teams
Sodelovanje s skupnimi preiskovalnimi enotami
Cooperation with joint investigation teams
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko zadevni imetniki pravic intelektualne lastnine ali njihovi predstavniki ter strokovnjaki prispevajo k preiskavam, ki jih opravljajo skupne preiskovalne enote v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji iz člena 3.
The Member States must ensure that the holders of intellectual property rights concerned, or their representatives, and experts, are allowed to assist the investigations carried out by joint investigation teams into the offences referred to in Article 3 .
Države članice zagotovijo sodelovanje imetnikov pravic intelektualne lastnine s skupnimi preiskovalnimi enotami v skladu z ureditvijo, ki je predvidena v Okvirnem sklepu Sveta 2002/465/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o skupnih preiskovalnih enotah 1 .
The Member States must ensure the cooperation of the holders of intellectual property rights with joint investigation teams in accordance with the arrangements for which provision is made in Council Framework Decision 2002/465/JHA of 13 June 2002 on joint investigation teams 1 .
1 UL L 162, 20.6.2002, str.
1 OJ L 162, 20.6.2002, p.
Države članice vzpostavijo ustrezne varovalne mehanizme, da zagotovijo, da ta prispevek ne poseže v pravice obdolženca, denimo s poseganjem v natančnost, neokrnjenost in nepristranskost dokazov.
(1a) The Member States shall put in place adequate safeguards to ensure that such assistance does not compromise the rights of the accused person, for example by affecting the accuracy, integrity or impartiality of evidence.
Vključitev imetnikov pravic intelektualne lastnine v skupne preiskovalne enote predstavlja tveganje s stališča nepristranskosti preiskave, zbranih dokazov in varovanja pravic obrambe.
The involvement of intellectual property rights holders in joint investigation teams presents risks in terms of the impartial nature of any investigation, the evidence presented and the protection of defence rights.