natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(b) naročila, oddana na področju zunanjih ukrepov, v vrednosti pod mejnimi vrednostmi iz člena 241(1)(a), člena 243(1)(a), ali člena 245(1)(a).
(b) contracts awarded in the field of external actions, with a value below the thresholds referred to in Article 241(1)(a), Article 243(1)(a), or Article 245(1)(a).
Kjer se naročnik odloči, da ne bo zahteval dokazil finančne, poslovne, tehnične in strokovne usposobljenosti kandidatov ali ponudnikov, ne sme biti izvršenega nobenega predhodnega financiranja ali vmesnih plačil.
Where the contracting authority decides not to require proof of the financial, economic, technical and professional capacity of candidates or tenderers, no pre-financing or interim payment may be made.
Predhodno financiranje se lahko izvrši, če se predloži finančna garancija v enakovrednem znesku.
However, a pre-financing can be made if a financial guarantee of an equivalent amount is provided.
Kjer se naročnik odloči, da ne bo zahteval dokazil finančne, poslovne, tehnične in strokovne usposobljenosti kandidatov ali ponudnikov, se lahko izvršijo vmesna plačila za že opravljene storitve ali za že dostavljeno blago.
Where the contracting authority decides not to require proof of the financial, economic, technical and professional capacity of candidates or tenderers, interim payments may be made where services have already been rendered or goods have already been delivered.
Vmesna plačila se lahko izvršijo, če je zagotovljena finančna garancija v enakem znesku, ali če lahko odredbodajalec zmanjša tveganje z drugimi ustreznimi sredstvi z enakim učinkom.
Interim payments may be made if a financial guarantee of an equivalent amount is provided or if the authorising officer can reduce the risk by other appropriate means to the same effect.
Če se naročnik odpove pravici po zahtevanju dokazil, se zdi nepravično, da bi to škodovalo upravičencu, zlasti če je upravičenec že izvedel del naročila.
If the contracting authority waives its right to demand evidence, it appears inequitable that this is held against the beneficiary, in particular, where the beneficiary has already performed a part of the contract.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 40 A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 40 A (new)
Člen 140 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 140 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
Člen 140 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 140 is replaced by the following:
Roki za predložitev ponudb in prijav za sodelovanje, ki jih naročnik določi v koledarskih dneh, morajo biti dovolj dolgi, da imajo zainteresirane osebe na voljo razumen in ustrezen rok za pripravo in predložitev svojih ponudb, zlasti ob upoštevanju zapletenosti naročila ali potrebe po ogledu lokacije ali pregledu dopolnilnih dokumentov k specifikaciji na kraju samem.
The time-limits for the receipt of tenders and requests to participate, laid down in calendar days by the contracting authorities, shall be long enough to allow interested parties a reasonable and appropriate period to prepare and submit their tenders, taking particular account of the complexity of the contract or the need to visit the site or consult on the spot the documents annexed to the specifications.
V odprtih postopkih za naročila, katerih vrednost je enaka ali višja od mejne vrednosti iz člena 158, je rok za predložitev ponudb običajno od 26 do 52 dni od datuma, ko je naročnik odposlal razpis v objavo, odvisno od zapletenosti naročila.
In open procedures for contracts with a value equal to or above the thresholds laid down in Article 158, the time limit for receipt of tenders shall generally be between 26 and 52 days from the date on which the contract notice is dispatched depending on the complexity of the contract.
V omejenih postopkih, v konkurenčnem dialogu iz člena 125b in v postopkih s pogajanji z objavo razpisa za naročila, katerih vrednost je enaka ali višja od mejne vrednosti iz člena 158, je rok za predložitev prijav za sodelovanje običajno od 18 do 37 dni od datuma, ko je naročnik odposlal razpis v objavo, odvisno od zapletenosti naročila.
In restricted procedures, competitive dialogue pursuant to Article 125b and in negotiated procedures where a contract notice is published for contracts with a value equal to or above the thresholds laid down in Article 158, the time limit for receipt of requests to participate shall generally be between 18 and 37 days from the date on which the contract notice is dispatched, depending on the complexity of the contract.
V omejenih postopkih za naročila, katerih vrednost je enaka ali višja od mejne vrednosti iz člena 158, je rok za predložitev ponudb običajno od 20 do 40 dni od datuma, ko je naročnik odposlal povabilo k oddaji ponudb, odvisno od zapletenosti naročila.
In restricted procedures for contracts with a value equal to or above the thresholds laid down in Article 158, the time limit for receipt of tenders shall generally be between 20 and 40 days from the date on which the invitation to tender is dispatched, depending on the complexity of the contract.
V omejenih postopkih neposredno po razpisu za zbiranje ponudb iz člena 128, je rok za predložitev ponudb običajno od 10 do 20 dni od datuma, ko je naročnik odposlal povabilo k oddaji ponudb, odvisno od zapletenosti naročila.
However, in restricted procedures after a call for expressions of interest referred to in Article 128, the time limit for receipt of tenders shall generally be between 10 and 20 days from the date on which the invitation to tender is dispatched, depending on the complexity of the contract.
Če je naročnik v skladu s členom 118(2) objavil predhodni razpis, se lahko rok za predložitev ponudb skrajša na 18 dni, vendar v nobenem primeru ne sme biti krajši od 11 dni od datuma, ko je naročnik odposlal v objavo razpis ali povabilo k oddaji ponudb.
Where the contracting authorities have published a pre-information notice in accordance with Article 118(2), the time limit for receipt of tenders may generally be reduced to 18 days but shall in no circumstances be less than 11 days from the date of dispatch of the contract notice or invitation to tender.
V prvem pododstavku navedeno skrajšanje roka je možno le, če predhodni razpis izpolnjuje naslednje pogoje:
The shortened time limit referred to in the first subparagraph shall be permitted only if the pre-information notice satisfies the following conditions:
(a) vsebuje vse potrebne informacije za objavo razpisa in če so te informacije na voljo v času objave razpisa,
(a) it contains all the information required for the contract notice, insofar as that information is available at the time the notice is published;
(b) v objavo je poslan najmanj 26 dni in največ 6 mesecev pred datumom, ko naročnik odpošlje razpis v objavo."
(b) it was sent for publication between 26 days and 6 months before the date on which the contract notice was sent.
Roki za predložitev ponudb se lahko skrajšajo za pet dni, če je od datuma objave razpisa ali razpisa za zbiranje ponudb vsa razpisna dokumentacija prosto in neposredno dostopna po elektronski poti."
The time limits for receipt of tenders may be shortened by five days if unrestricted and direct access is available by electronic means to all documents constituting the call for tenders from the date of publication of the contract notice or the call for expressions of interest."
Ta sprememba bo s skrajšanjem rokov za postopke za oddajo naročila pospešila postopek.
This change will speed up the process by shortening the time limits for contract award procedures.
Jasno mora biti, da je na časovne omejitve treba gledati kot na okvir, v katerem se na osnovi okoliščin posameznega primera določi poseben rok.
It should be made clear that the time limits are to be seen as a window within which a specific deadline can be determined on the basis of the circumstances of the individual case.
Člen 164, odstavek 3 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 164, paragraph 3 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
(46a) V členu 164 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z:
(46a) In Article 164, paragraph3 is replaced by the following:
Pri sporazumih o donacijah so dovoljene spremembe, če se spremenijo okoliščine, česar ni predvidela ali ni mogla predvideti nobena stran, ter če bi imelo nespremenjeno izvajanje sporazuma nesprejemljive posledice za enega ali več pogodbenikov ali bi kako drugače onemogočilo izvajanje naročila.
Amendments to grant agreements may be made, if circumstances have changed, and the change of circumstances was not foreseen or foreseeable by either party and the unchanged performance of the agreement would lead to unreasonable consequences for any one or several of the parties or otherwise frustrate the contract.
Sporazumi o donacijah se lahko spremenijo samo z dodatnimi pisnimi sporazumi.
Grant agreements may be amended only by written additional agreements.
Namen ali učinek takšnih dodatnih sporazumov ne sme biti tak, da bi postal vprašljiv sklep o dodelitvi donacije ali da ne bi bila več zagotovljena enaka obravnava pogodbenikov.
Such additional agreements shall not have the purpose or the effect of making such changes to agreements as would call into question the grant award decision or be contrary to the equal treatment of the parties.
Če je sprememba naročila nezadostna pomoč, se mora pogodbenikom, vsem skupaj ali posamezno, dovoliti prekinitev sporazuma."
Should an amendment to the contract be an insufficient remedy, the parties shall, as a whole or individually, be allowed to terminate the agreement."
Ob neupoštevanju temeljnega načela, po katerem so pogodbene obveznosti zavezujoče za pogodbenike, dokler niso izpolnjene ("pacta sunt servanda"), je pravično, da se pogodbenikom omogoči, da odstopijo od svojih pogodbenih obveznosti (na primer, da spremenijo obveznosti s spremembo pogodbe), če se spremenijo okoliščine.
Departing from the basic principle that contractual undertakings are binding on the parties until they are fulfilled "pacta sunt servanda", it appears equitable to allow the parties to depart from their contractual obligations (i.e. to change the obligations by amending the contract), if circumstances change.
V vsakem primeru so dolgoročne pogodbe vedno povezane s tveganjem, da se bodo okoliščine spremenile.
However, long term contracts always bear the risk of changing circumstances.
Za ohranjanje pravne varnosti pogodbenikov, mora biti mejna vrednost za spreminjanje naročil visoka.
In order to maintain legal certainty for the parties to the agreement, the threshold for changing / amending contracts must be set high.
Zato se naročilo lahko spremeni samo, če bi njegovo nespremenjeno izvajanje imelo nesprejemljive posledice.
Therefore, the contract may only be amended, if its unchanged performance would give rise to unreasonable consequences.
Če se naročila ne more ohraniti s pomočjo spremembe, morajo imeti pogodbeniki pravico, da ga prekinejo.
If the contract cannot be salvaged by amending it, the parties should have the right to terminate it.
Člen 173, odstavek 2, pododstavek 2 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 173, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
V ta namen odredbodajalec zahteva častno izjavo potencialnih upravičencev.
For that purpose the authorising officer shall request a declaration from potential beneficiaries on their honour.
Vlogam za donacije, ki presegajo 25.000 EUR, se priložijo tudi izkaz uspeha, bilanca stanja za zadnje proračunsko leto, za katerega je bil pripravljen zaključni račun, in druga pisna dokazila, ki se zahtevajo v razpisu za oddajo predlogov, odvisno od ocene tveganja, ki jo izvede odgovorni odredbodajalec na svojo lastno odgovornost.
For applications for a grant exceeding EUR 25,000 , the profit and loss account, the balance sheet for the last financial year for which the accounts were closed and any other supporting document requested in the call for proposals shall, depending on the risk analysis conducted by the authorising officer responsible on his own responsibility, also be attached to the application.
Vlogam za donacije, ki presegajo 50.000 EUR, se priložijo tudi izkaz uspeha, bilanca stanja za zadnje proračunsko leto, za katerega je bil pripravljen zaključni račun, in druga pisna dokazila, ki se zahtevajo v razpisu za oddajo predlogov, odvisno od ocene tveganja, ki jo izvede odgovorni odredbodajalec na svojo lastno odgovornost.
For applications for a grant exceeding EUR 50 000 , the profit and loss account, the balance sheet for the last financial year for which the accounts were closed and any other supporting document requested in the call for proposals shall, depending on the risk analysis conducted by the authorising officer responsible on his own responsibility, also be attached to the application.
Povečati prilagodljivost pri upravljanju skladov.
Increase flexibility in the administration of funds.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 50 (B)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 50 (B)
Člen 173, odstavek 4 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 173, paragraph 4 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
(b) Odstavek 4 se spremeni, kakor sledi:
(b) Paragraph 4 is amended as follows:
(b) Odstavek 4 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(b) Paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
(i) Prvi pododstavek se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
( i ) The first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
Kadar vloga zadeva donacije za ukrep, za katerega znesek presega 750 000 EUR, ali donacije za materialne stroške, ki presegajo 100 000 EUR, se vlogi priloži zunanje revizijsko poročilo, ki ga pripravi pooblaščeni revizor.
Where the application concerns grants for an action for which the amount exceeds EUR 750,000 or operating grants which exceed EUR 100,000 , the application shall be accompanied by an external audit report produced by an approved auditor.
Navedeno poročilo potrjuje račune za zadnje proračunsko leto, za katero so podatki na voljo.
That report shall certify the accounts for the last financial year available.
Kadar vloga zadeva donacije za ukrep, za katerega znesek presega 750.000 EUR, ali donacije za materialne stroške, ki presegajo 100.000 EUR, se vlogi priloži zunanje revizijsko poročilo, ki ga pripravi pooblaščeni revizor , ali neodvisna revizija, če imajo organizacije lastne službe notranje revizije.
Where the application concerns grants for an action for which the amount exceeds EUR 750 000 or operating grants which exceed EUR 100 000 , the application shall be accompanied by an external audit report produced by an approved auditor , or in the case of organisations possessing an independent audit function, an independent audit .
Določbe prvega pododstavka se uporabljajo samo za prvo vlogo, ki jo prijavitelj predloži odredbodajalcu v katerem koli proračunskem letu.
The provisions of the first subparagraph shall apply only to the first application made by a beneficiary to an authorising officer in any one budget year.
V primeru sporazumov med Komisijo in več upravičenci ti mejni zneski veljajo za vsakega upravičenca.
In the case of agreements linking the Commission and a number of beneficiaries, those thresholds shall apply to each beneficiary.
V primeru partnerstva iz člena 163 mora biti pred sklenitvijo okvirnega sporazuma opravljena zunanja revizija, ali v primeru, da imajo organizacije lastne službe notranje revizije, neodvisna revizija, ki zajema zadnji dve poslovni leti.
In the case of partnerships as referred to in Article 163, an external audit, or in the case of organisations possessing an independent audit function, an independent audit, covering the last two financial years available must be produced before the framework agreement is concluded.
(ii) Peti pododstavek se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(ii) The fifth subparagraph is replaced by the following:
Odgovorni odredbodajalec lahko glede na svojo oceno tveganja opusti obveznost, da se pripravi zunanja revizija za upravičence, ki so v okviru sporazumov z več upravičenci sprejeli solidarnostno odgovornost.
The authorising officer responsible may, depending on his risk analysis, waive the obligation of external audit for beneficiaries who have accepted joint and several liabilities in the case of agreements with a number of beneficiaries.
Odgovorni odredbodajalec lahko glede na svojo oceno tveganja opusti obveznost, da se pripravi zunanja ali neodvisna revizija za upravičence, ki so v okviru sporazumov z več upravičenci sprejeli solidarnostno odgovornost.
The authorising officer responsible may, depending on his risk analysis, waive the obligation of external or independent audit for beneficiaries who have accepted joint and several liabilities in the case of agreements with a number of beneficiaries.
(iii) Doda se šesti pododstavek:
(iii) The following sixth subparagraph is added:
Prvi pododstavek se ne uporablja za javne organe, izobraževalne ustanove in mednarodne organizacije iz člena 43(2) .
The first subparagraph shall not apply to public bodies, educational establishments, and the international organisations referred to in Article 43 (2) .
Prvi pododstavek se ne uporablja za javne organe, izobraževalne ustanove in mednarodne organizacije iz člena 43(2) (a), (b) in (c) .
The first subparagraph shall not apply to public bodies, educational establishments, and the international organisations referred to in Article 43(2) (a), (b) and (c) .
Da bi se izognili dvojnim stroškom, za organizacije z lastnimi službami notranje revizije ni potrebna zunanja revizija.
Organizations possessing independent audit functions need not be externally audited in order to save double expense.
Člen 180, odstavek 2 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 180, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
(53a) V členu 180 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(53a) In Article 180, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
Odgovorni odredbodajalec lahko na podlagi svoje analize vodstvenega tveganja za katero koli plačilo zahteva zunanjo revizijo računovodskih izkazov, ki jo opravi pooblaščeni revizor, ali neodvisno revizijo, če imajo organizacije lastne službe notranje revizije.
An external audit of the financial statements and underlying accounts, produced by an approved auditor, or in the case of organisations possessing an independent audit function, an independent audit, may be demanded by the authorising officer responsible in support of any payment on the basis of his analysis of risks.
V primeru donacije za ukrep ali donacije za poslovanje se revizijsko poročilo priloži zahtevku za plačilo.
In the case of a grant for an action or of an operating grant, the audit report shall be attached to the request for payment.
Namen revizijskega poročila je potrditi, da so predloženi obračuni resnični, zanesljivi in utemeljeni z ustreznimi dokazili.
Its purpose is to certify that the costs declared by the beneficiary in the financial statements on which the request for payment is based are real, exact and eligible in accordance with the grant agreement.
Zunanja revizija, ali neodvisna revizija, če imajo organizacije lastne službe notranje revizije, je za vmesna plačila po proračunskem letu ali plačila razlike obvezna:
An external audit, or in the case of organisations possessing an independent audit function, an independent audit shall be compulsory for interim payments per financial year and for payments of balances in the case of the following:
(a) pri donacijah za ukrep v višini 750.000 EUR ali več;
(a) grants for an action of EUR 750 000 or more;
(b) pri donacijah za poslovanje v višini 100.000 EUR ali več.
(b) operating grants of EUR 100 000 or more.
Glede na analizo tveganj se lahko odgovorni odredbodajalec odpove obvezni zunanji ali neodvisni reviziji v primeru:
Depending on his analysis of risks, the authorising officer responsible may also waive the obligation of an external or independent audit in the case of:
(a) javnih organov in mednarodnih organizacij iz člena 43, odstavkov 1 in 2 (a), (b) in (c);
(a) public bodies and the international organisations referred to in Article 43 paragraph 1 and 2 (a), (b) and (c);
(b) upravičencev do donacij v zvezi s človekoljubno pomočjo in obvladovanjem kriznih razmer, razen v zvezi s plačili razlike;
(b) the beneficiaries of grants in connection with humanitarian aid and the management of crisis situations, save in respect of payments of balances;
(c) upravičencev do donacij v zvezi s človekoljubno pomočjo, ki so podpisali okvirni sporazum o partnerstvu iz člena 163, in ki imajo vzpostavljen sistem nadzora, ki omogoča enakovredna jamstva za ta plačila."
(c) for payments of balances, beneficiaries of grants in connection with humanitarian aid who have signed a partnership framework agreement, as referred to in Article 163, and who have in place a system of control offering equivalent guarantees for such payments."
Možnost, da se zaprosi za neodvisno revizijo namesto zunanje je upravičena v primerih, ko neodvisna revizijska služba že obstaja.
The possibility to demand independent instead of external audits is justified in cases in which an independent audit function already exists.
Člen 182 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Article 182 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
(54) Člen 182 se spremeni, kakor sledi:
(54) Article 182 is amended as follows:
(54) Člen 182 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(54) Article 182 is replaced by the following:
(a) Odstavek 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(a) Paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Odgovorni odredbodajalec lahko zahteva, da upravičenec predloži garancijo vnaprej v isti vrednosti kot predhodno financiranje, da zmanjša finančna tveganja v zvezi s plačilom predhodnega financiranja.
The authorising officer responsible may require the beneficiary to lodge a guarantee in advance, for the same amount as the pre-financing, in order to limit the financial risks connected with the payment of pre-financing.
Odgovorni odredbodajalec lahko na podlagi analize tveganja zahteva, da upravičenec predloži garancijo vnaprej v višini do vrednosti predhodnega financiranja , da zmanjša finančna tveganja v zvezi s plačilom predhodnega financiranja , če ni možno določiti nobenega drugega načina jamstva za terjatve, ki bi bil enako učinkovit.
The authorising officer responsible may on the basis of a risk analysis require the beneficiary to lodge a guarantee in advance, for up to the same amount as the pre-financing, in order to limit the financial risks connected with the payment of pre-financing if no other means to secure the debt which is equally effective can be established .
(b) V odstavku 2 se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(b) In paragraph 2, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
Kadar vnaprejšnje financiranje predstavlja nad 80 % skupnega zneska donacije in presega 60 000 EUR, se zahteva garancija.
Where the pre-financing represents over 80% of the total amount of the grant and exceeds EUR 60,000 , a guarantee shall be required.
Kadar vnaprejšnje financiranje predstavlja nad 80 % skupnega zneska donacije in presega 60.000 EUR, se zahteva garancija, če ni možno določiti nobenega drugega načina jamstva za terjatve, ki bi bil enako učinkovit.
Where the pre-financing represents over 80% of the total amount of the grant and exceeds EUR 60 000 , a guarantee shall be required if no other means to secure the debt which is equally effective can be established.
Za nevladne organizacije, ki delujejo na področju zunanjih ukrepov, se garancija zahteva za vnaprejšnje financiranje, ki presega 1.000.000 EUR ali predstavlja več kakor 90 % skupnega zneska donacije, če ni možno določiti nobenega drugega načina jamstva za terjatve, ki bi bil enako učinkovit.
For NGOs operating in the field of external action, that guarantee shall be demanded in respect of pre-financing exceeding EUR 1 000 000 or representing over 90 % of the total amount of the grant if no other means to secure the debt which is equally effective can be established.
Garancija mora veljati dovolj dolgo, da se lahko unovči.
The guarantee shall be valid for a period sufficiently long to allow it to be activated.
Garancijo izda pooblaščena banka ali finančna institucija s sedežem v eni od držav članic.
The guarantee shall be provided by an approved bank or financial institution established in one of the Member States.