natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· razdelitev nekdanjega generalnega direktorata za odbore in delegacije na generalni direktorat za notranjo in generalni direktorat za zunanjo politiko Unije, pri čemer je bilo upoštevano vse večje upravno breme in raven specializacije,
· dividing the former Directorate General for Committees and Delegations into two, creating a Directorate General for Internal Policies and a Directorate General for External Policies, thereby taking into account the increasing legislative burden and level of specialisation,
· izboljšanje odnosa med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti,
· improving relations between the European Parliament and the national Parliaments,
· prenehanje generalnega direktorata za raziskave in njegova ponovna ustanovitev v obliki oddelkov za različne politike, ki tesno sodelujejo s parlamentarnimi odbori,
· disbanding the former Directorate General for Research and re-establishing it in the form of policy departments working closely with parliamentary committees,
· odborom je bil dodeljen proračun za raziskave in prispevke zunanjih, neodvisnih strokovnjakov,
· endowing parliamentary committees with an expertise budget for external studies and contributions from independent experts,
· razvoj parlamentarne knjižnice,
· developing the use of its library,
· ustanavljanje horizontalnih projektnih skupin za prednostne teme in
· setting up horizontal project teams on priority issues, and
· izboljšanje kakovosti parlamentarnih besedil;
· improving the quality of parliamentary texts;
115. ugotavlja, da je predsedstvo 30. novembra 2005 imenovalo dva podpredsednika in dva kvestorja zaradi priprave novih pravil o plačilu stroškov in nadomestil za poslance v statutu poslancev, ki bo začel veljati julija 2009; prosi, da se Odboru za proračunski nadzor posreduje kopija vmesnega poročila, sprejetega 13. decembra 2006, in drugih dokumentov, ki so nastali pri pripravljanju osnutka; poudarja, da bo raziskava o nadomestilih za poslance zelo dragocena za pripravljavce;
Takes note that its Bureau appointed two Vice-Presidents and two Questors on 30 November 2005 with a view to preparing new rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members under the Members' Statute which will enter into force in July 2009; asks that the Committee on Budgetary Control be given a copy of the interim report, adopted on 13 December 2006, and other position papers the working party might draft; underlines that the audit on the Members' parliamentary allowance will be of high value for the working party;
117. ugotavlja, da so odredbodajalci sistematično pregledovali dolgoročne pogodbe Parlamenta in da pri tem opravilu niso naleteli na noben primer, ki bi ogrožal finančne interese Parlamenta; pozdravlja dejstvo, da se bodo takšni pregledi opravljali letno in da bodo rezultati vključeni v letno poročilo o dejavnostih;
Notes that the authorising officers by delegation have systematically reviewed Parliament's long-standing contracts and that this exercise did not reveal any situation prejudicial to Parliament's financial interests; welcomes that this exercise will in future be conducted annually and that its results will be included in the annual activity reports;
119. ugotavlja, da pri uvajanju sistema elektronskih podpisov obstajajo zakonske in organizacijske težave: s pravnega stališča bi bilo treba razjasniti, kako projekt uskladiti z zahtevami poslovnika, ki urejajo vlaganje predlogov sprememb na plenarnem zasedanju; z organizacijskega stališča bi bilo treba na novo opredeliti način vlaganja predlogov sprememb in poslanskih vprašanj;
Takes note of the legal and organisational problems linked to the introduction of a system of electronic signatures: from a legal viewpoint clarification would be required as to how to reconcile the project with the provisions of the Rules of Procedure governing the tabling of amendments in plenary; from an organisational viewpoint arrangements for tabling amendments and parliamentary questions would have to be redefined;
121. opozarja, da je disciplinski svet dokončal delo in ugotovil, kdo je odgovoren za primanjkljaj v blagajni v višini 4.136.125 BEF, ki je nastal leta 1982; prosi generalnega sekretarja, da Odboru za proračunski nadzor sporoči, kakšni so izidi disciplinskih ukrepov in ali je bila vsota, vključno z obrestmi, povrnjena.
Recalls that the Disciplinary Board has completed its work on allocating responsibility in connection with the discrepancy of BEF 4 136 125 between the cash situation and the corresponding amounts in 1982; asks the Secretary-General to inform the Committee on Budgetary Control about the outcome of the disciplinary proceedings and also whether the amount, including interests, was recovered.
Razrešnica glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005
Discharge for 2005 – European Parliament
Albert Deß (v imenu Alda Patriciella)
Albert Deß (voting for Aldo Patriciello)
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.........................................................3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION..............................................3
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.........................................................5
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION..............................................6
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.................................................7
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION............................................8
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................43
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ...................................................46
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................46
OPINION of the Committee on Development ........................................................49
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................50
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ................53
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................53
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 57
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................58
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ..................................62
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ..................................................61
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ..................................65
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 66
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 70
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................68
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality .....72
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005, Oddelek III – Komisija
on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005, Section III – Commission
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005
– having regard to the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005
– ob upoštevanju zaključnega računa Evropskih skupnosti za proračunsko leto 2005 – Zvezek I ( SEC(2006)0916 – C6-0263/2006 , SEC(2006)0915 – C6-0262/2006 )
– having regard to the final accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2005 - Volume I - ( SEC(2006)0916 – C6‑0263/2006 , SEC(2006)0915 – C6‑0262/2006 )
UL C 263, 31.10.2006, str.
OJ C 263, 31.10.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije organu, pristojnemu za podelitev razrešnice, o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi sklepov o razrešnicah za leto 2004 ( KOM(2006)0642 , KOM(2006)0641 ) in delovnega dokumenta Komisije – Priloga k poročilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi sklepov o razrešnicah za leto 2004 ( SEC(2006)1376 , SEC(2006)1377 ),
– having regard to the Commission's annual report to the discharge authority on the follow-up to 2004 discharge decisions ( COM(2006)0642 , COM(2006)0641 ), and the Commission staff working paper - Annex to the report from the Commission to the European Parliament on the follow-up to 2004 discharge decisions ( SEC(2006)1376 , SEC(2006)1377 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij „Dosežki politik leta 2005“ ( KOM(2006)0124 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, entitled 'Policy Achievements in 2005' ( COM(2006)0124 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Zbirno poročilo o dosežkih Komisije pri upravljanju v letu 2005“ ( KOM(2006)0277 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Synthesis of the Commission’s management achievements in 2005' ( COM(2006)0277 ),
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Komisije organu, pristojnemu za podelitev razrešnice, o notranjih revizijah, opravljenih leta 2005 ( KOM(2006)0279 ),
– having regard to the Commission's annual report to the discharge authority on internal audits carried out in 2005 ( COM(2006)0279 ),
– ob upoštevanju zbirnega poročila Komisije „Odgovori držav članic na Letno poročilo Računskega sodišča 2004“ ( KOM(2006)0184 ),
– having regard to the Commission's report on Member States' replies to the Court of Auditors' 2004 annual report ( COM(2006)0184 ),
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige o pobudi za preglednost v Evropi, ki jo je Komisija sprejela 3. maja 2006,
– having regard to the Green Paper on the European Transparency Initiative adopted by the Commission on 3 May 2006,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja št. 2/2004 Računskega sodišča o modelu „enotne revizije“ (in predloga za okvir notranje kontrole Skupnosti)
– having regard to Opinion No 2/2004 of the Court of Auditors on the 'single audit' model (and a proposal for a Community internal control framework)
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o časovnem načrtu za integriran okvir notranje kontrole (KOM(2005)252),
– having regard to the Commission communication on a roadmap to an integrated internal control framework ( COM(2005)0252 ),
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta Komisije za integriran okvir notranje kontrole ( KOM(2006)0009 ),
– having regard to the Commission's action plan towards an integrated internal control framework ( COM(2006)0009 ),
– ob upoštevanju prvega poročila o rezultatih uresničevanja akcijskega načrta Komisije za integriran okvir notranje kontrole z dne 19. julija 2006 ( KOM(2006)1009 ),
– having regard to the first report on the scoreboard for the application of the Commission action plan towards an integrated internal control framework published on 19 July 2006 ( SEC(2006)1009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za evropsko unijo zgornjega doma britanskega parlamenta z naslovom „Finančno upravljanje in goljufija v Evropski uniji: ugotovitve, dejstva in predlogi“, ki je bilo objavljeno 13. novembra 2006,
– having regard to the House of Lords European Union Committee report entitled 'Financial Management and Fraud in the European Union: Perceptions, Facts and Proposals', which was published on 13 November 2006,
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča glede izvrševanja proračuna za proračunsko leto 2005
– having regard to the Court of Auditor's annual report on implementation of the budget for the financial year 2005
1. in njegovih posebnih poročil skupaj z odgovori revidiranih institucij,
1. and its special reports, each accompanied by the replies of the institutions audited,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta z dne 27. februarja 2007 (5710/2007 - C6-0081/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council's recommendation of 27 February 2007 (5710/2007 - C6‑0081/2007 ),
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 1995/2006 (UL L 390, 30.12.2006, str.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p.
1). zlasti členov 37 in 146 te uredbe,
1). , and in particular Articles 145, 146 and 147 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja št. 4/2006 Računskega sodišča o osnutku uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002
– having regard to Opinion No 4/2006 of the Court of Auditors on the draft Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002
UL C 273, 9.11.2006, str.
OJ C 273, 9.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 70 Poslovnika in njegove priloge V,
– having regard to Rule 70 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenj drugih zadevnih odborov ( A6–0095/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the other committees concerned ( A6‑0095/2007 ),
o zaključku poslovnih knjig glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005, Oddelek III – Komisija
on closing the accounts for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005, Section III – Commission
s pripombami, ki so sestavni del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005, Oddelek III – Komisija
with comments forming an integral part of the decision on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005, Section III – Commission
A. ker člen 274 Pogodbe ES predvideva, da je Komisija odgovorna za izvrševanje proračuna Skupnosti v skladu z načelom dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in v sodelovanju z državami članicami,
A. whereas Article 274 of the EC Treaty establishes that responsibility for implementation of the Community budget lies with the Commission and must be exercised with regard to the principles of sound financial management, in cooperation with the Member States,
B. ker je najboljši način, da Komisija pokaže svojo resnično zavezanost preglednosti in dobremu finančnemu poslovodenju, izvajanje in popolna podpora pobudam za izboljšanje kakovosti finančnega poslovodenja, da prejme pozitivno izjavo o zanesljivosti (DAS
B. whereas the most effective means for the Commission to demonstrate that it is genuinely committed to ensuring transparency and sound financial management is to do all it can to support measures seeking to enhance the quality of financial management, with a view to obtaining a positive statement of assurance (DAS
Kratica za francoski izraz „Déclaration d'assurance“. ) s strani Evropskega računskega sodišča (v nadaljevanju „Sodišče“),
Abbreviation of the French term 'Déclaration d'assurance'. ) from the European Court of Auditors,
C. ker je treba s pozornim spremljanjem napredka Komisije in držav članic podpreti izboljšanje finančnega upravljanja v Uniji ter mu dati nov zagon;
C. whereas improvement of the financial management in the Union must be supported and given momentum by a close monitoring of progress in the Commission and in the Member States,
D. ker je za izvajanje politike EU značilno „deljeno upravljanje“ proračuna Skupnosti med Komisijo in državami članicami, kar pomeni, da 80 % odhodkov Skupnosti upravljajo države članice,
D. whereas the implementation of EU policies is characterised by the 'shared management' of the Community budget by the Commission and the Member States, under which 80% of Community expenditure is administered by the Member States,
E. ker bi moral prevzem odgovornosti za nadzor s strani držav članic na področju priprave finančnih informacij in zahteva, da se povzetki razpoložljivih kontrol in obrazložitve pripravljajo v skladu s členom 44 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
E. whereas Member States' assumption of control responsibilities in connection with the production of financial information and the requirement, in particular in implementation of point 44 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
F. ker je Parlament v resolucijah o razrešnici za leti 2003 in 2004 z dne 12. aprila 2005
F. whereas in its resolutions of 12 April 2005
169. in 27. aprila 2006
169. and 27 April 2006
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0157 . predlagal, da bi morala vsaka država članica zagotoviti predhodno izjavo o razkritju in naknadno letno izjavo o zanesljivosti v zvezi s porabo sredstev EU,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0157 . , on the 2003 and 2004 discharges respectively, Parliament proposed that each Member State should provide an ex ante disclosure statement and an annual ex post statement of assurance as regards its use of EU funding,
G. ker Parlament kot osrednje načelo opredeljuje dejstvo, da mora Komisija v skladu s Pogodbo ES v celoti prevzeti končno odgovornost za upravljanje proračuna in države članice, odgovornost za upravljanje s sredstvi, ki so jim bila dana na voljo;
G. whereas the overriding principle sought by Parliament is that, in accordance with the EC Treaty, both the Commission's final responsibility for management of the Community budget and the Member States' powers to manage the funds made available to them should be fully shouldered,
H. ker je Ekonomsko-finančni svet v svojih sklepih z dne 8. novembra 2005 zavrnil predlog Parlamenta v zvezi z izjavami na nacionalni ravni
H. whereas in its conclusions of 8 November 2005, the ECOFIN Council rejected Parliament's proposal regarding national level declarations
Glej sklepe Ekonomsko-finančnega sveta z dne 8. novembra 2005 na naslovu:
See the conclusions of the ECOFIN Council meeting of 8 November 2005 at
I. ker točka 44 zgoraj navedenega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma določa, da ustrezni revizijski organi v državah članicah pripravijo oceno skladnosti sistemov upravljanja in kontrole s predpisi Skupnosti, ter da se države članice zavežejo, da bodo na ustrezni nacionalni ravni pripravile letni povzetek razpoložljivih revizij in izjav,
I. whereas point 44 of the IIA states that the relevant audit authorities in Member States will produce an assessment concerning the compliance of management and control systems with the regulations of the Community and that Member States therefore undertake to produce an annual summary at the appropriate national level of the available audits and declarations,
J. ker se načelo učinkovitega notranjega nadzora vključuje med proračunska načela finančne uredbe od njene spremembe z Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 1995/2006, kot je v zgoraj navedenem akcijskem načrtu predlagala Komisija,
J. whereas the principle of effective internal control is one of the budgetary principles set out in the Financial Regulation following its amendment by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006, as proposed by the Commission in the action plan referred to above,
K. ker je Sodišče v letnem poročilu 2005 v zvezi z izvajanjem integriranega okvira notranje kontrole poudarilo, da „sorazmernost in stroškovna učinkovitost kontrol predstavljata enega najpomembnejših ciljev, ki jih je odobrila Komisija“(točka 2.10), in je pri tem ugotovilo, da bi lahko v tej povezavi postopek poenostavitve (npr. pogostejša uporaba pavšalnih in fiksnih plačil, poenostavljena pravila za oddajo javnih naročil in odobritev pomoči) kot tudi uporaba revizijskih potrdil in izjav o zanesljivosti s strani tretjih oseb, odgovornih za izvrševanje proračuna, imeli pomembno vlogo;
K. whereas in paragraph 2.10 of its annual report for 2005, in connection with the establishment of an integrated internal control framework, the Court of Auditors stresses that 'one of the most important objectives approved by the Commission is represented by the proportionality and cost-effectiveness of controls', stating that in this context, the process of simplification (e.g. greater use of flat-rate and lump-sum payments, simplified rules on procurement and grants) and the use of audit certificates and assurance declarations from third parties responsible for budget implementation tasks could play a significant role,
L. ker je Ekonomsko-finančni svet 8. novembra 2005 v svojih sklepih ocenil, da so vzpostavitev integriranega notranjega nadzora ter jasnost in poenostavitev zakonodaje, ki velja za nadzor, bistveni, in je „od Komisije [zahteval], da oceni stroške kontrol po področjih odhodkov“ (točka 5).
L. whereas in the above mentioned conclusions of 8 November 2005 the ECOFIN Council also took the view that it was of fundamental importance to introduce an integrated internal control system and simplify the legislation on controls and requested 'that the Commission assess the cost of controls by area of expenditure' (paragraph 5);
M. ker sta delovanje parlamentarnega odbora za proračunski nadzor na splošno in zlasti postopek razrešnice del postopka, katerega cilji so 1) vzpostavitev popolne odgovornosti Komisije kot celote, posameznih komisarjev in vseh ostalih udeležencev, pomembnih za finančno poslovodenje EU v skladu s Pogodbo ES, 2) izvajanje za to ustreznega letnega postopka, ki Parlamentu omogoča, da se neposredno stopi poveže z odgovornimi za to poslovodenje, ter 3) izboljšanje finančnega poslovodenja v EU in s tem ustvarjanje trdnejše podlage za odločanje na podlagi rezultatov revizije Računskega sodišča,
M. whereas the work of its Committee on Budgetary Control in general and the discharge procedure in particular form part of a process seeking to: (1) establish full accountability from the Commission as a whole and individual Commissioners, as well as from all other relevant actors, for financial management in the EU, in accordance with the Treaty; (2) implement an annual procedure that will facilitate this and enable Parliament to remain in direct contact with the key stakeholders in charge of such management; and (3) improve financial management in the EU in the light of the Court of Auditors' audit results and thereby create a more solid basis for decision-taking,
N. ker bi moral odbor za proračun upoštevati rezultate in priporočila razrešnice za leto 2005 v naslednjem proračunskem postopku,
N. whereas its Committee on Budgets should take due account of the 2005 discharge results and recommendations during the next budgetary procedure,
O. ker je Sodišče za uslužbence 13. decembra 2006 v primeru F-17/05 Carvalho razveljavilo sklep Komisije z dne 22. septembra 2004 o podaljšanju invalidnosti,
O. whereas by the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 December 2006 in Case F-17/05 Carvalho , the Commission decision of 22 September 2004 prolonging invalidity was annulled,
HORIZONTALNA VPRAŠANJA
HORIZONTAL ISSUES
2. pozdravlja zlasti prizadevanje služb Komisije za sprejetje računovodenja proračunskega leta v roku, ki ga finančna uredba določa za oblikovanje finančnih izkazov;
Welcomes in particular the efforts made by the Commission to adopt the accounts for the financial year within the Financial Regulation deadlines for the production of the financial statements;
4. poziva Komisijo, da takoj odpravi pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, da se prepreči vpliv na zanesljivost finančnih izkazov za leto 2006;
Calls on the Commission to take urgent steps to remedy the shortcomings noted by the Court, with a view to preventing them from affecting the reliability of the financial statements for 2006;
7. obžaluje dejstvo, da v skladu s pripombami Sodišča v letnem poročilu 2005 (točka 1.49) računovodja ni upošteval računovodskih pravil št. 2 in 12 v zvezi z novimi strukturami, predstavitvijo bilance stanja in novim obravnavanjem pokojninskih pravic obveznosti Skupnosti; ugotavlja, da je računovodja Komisije pregledal računovodska pravila št. 2 in 12 oktobra 2006;
Regrets that, as noted by the Court of Auditors in paragraph 1.49 of its 2005 annual report, the accounting officer failed fully to comply with Accounting Rules Nos 2 and 12 with regard to the new structure and presentation of the balance sheet and the revised treatment of the Communities' pension liabilities; notes that the Commission's accounting officer revised Accounting Rules Nos 2 and 12 in October 2006;
Upravljanje proračuna
Budgetary management