natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zato je treba odgovoriti na vprašanje, ali predlagani okvirni sklep presega "olajševanje in pospeševanje sodelovanja pri postopkih in izvrševanju odločitev med pristojnimi ministrstvi in sodnimi ali drugimi primerljivimi organi držav članic, kjer je to primerno, pa tudi s sodelovanjem prek Eurojusta" , kot je predvideno v točki (a) člena 31(1).
Therefore the question to be answered is whether the proposed framework decision goes beyond " facilitating and accelerating cooperation between competent ministries and judicial or equivalent authorities of the Member States, including, where appropriate, cooperation through Eurojust, in relation to proceedings and the enforcement of decisions" , as provided for in point (a) of Article 31(1).
Glede na to, da ni posredi nobenih postopkovnih zapletov, je to edino vprašanje, na katerega je treba odgovoriti.
Given that no procedural implications are involved, this is the only question to be answered.
Zgolj zaradi namena okvirnega sklepa, kot je določen v členu 1 - " Njegov namen je določiti pravila, na podlagi katerih ena država članica prizna in na svojem ozemlju izvršuje prepoved, ki je posledica obsodbe za ta kazniva dejanja. " - bi se uporaba točke (c) člena 31(1) zdela zaželena samo v primeru ex ambundanti cautela .
In view simply of the purpose of the framework decision as set out in Article 1 - " Its purpose is to establish the rules under which a Member State shall recognise and enforce in its territory prohibitions arising from convictions for such offences. " - recourse to point (c) of Article 31(1) would seem desirable if only ex ambundanti cautela .
Vendar pa je iz nadaljnje proučitve določb predlaganega okvirnega sklepa jasno razvidno, da skušajo nekatere izmed njih zagotoviti usklajenost pravil, veljavnih v državah članicah, v smislu točke (c) člena 31(1).
However, it is plain from further examination of the provisions of the proposed framework decision that some of them do seek to ensure compatibility in rules applicable in the Member States within the meaning of point (c) of Article 31(1).
Člen 3 od držav članic dejansko zahteva, da " izvedejo potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovijo vpis vsake prepovedi v kazensko evidenco ".
Indeed, Article 3 requires Member States to " take the necessary steps to ensure that any prohibition is registered in the criminal record ".
Glede tega je v pojasnilu k belgijski pobudi kar najbolj jasno zapisano: " Ta okvirni sklep pa državam članicam tudi nedvoumno nalaga, da v svojih zakonodajah določijo sankcijo prepovedi, povezano z obsodbami za to vrsto kaznivih dejanj. "
In this respect, the explanatory note to the Belgian initiative could not put it in any plainer terms: " The framework decision would also require Member States to provide in their national legislation for a sentence of disqualification associated with convictions for such offences."
Poleg tega člen 6 od držav članic zahteva, da "priznajo vsako prepoved, pri čemer ne zahtevajo nobene druge formalnosti, in jo izvršujejo".
In addition, Article 6 requires Member States to " recognise any prohibition, without any formalities being required, and ... enforce it ".
V členu 7 pa je zopet naveden omejen seznam okoliščin, v katerih lahko pristojni nacionalni organi zavrnejo priznanje in izvrševanje prepovedi.
Then again, Article 7 sets out a limited list of circumstances in which national competent authorities may refuse to recognise and enforce a prohibition.
Člen 8 določa, da je izvrševanje določbe odvisno samo od predložitve posebnega obrazca.
Article 8, for its part, makes enforcement of a provision conditional only upon presentation of a particular form.
Nazadnje člen 9 od držav članic zahteva, da "izvede[jo] potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi obsojencu zagotovi[jo] nesuspenzivno pravno sredstvo za pritožbo".
Lastly, Article 9 requires Member States to " put in place the necessary arrangements to ensure that the convicted person has a non-suspensive legal remedy ".
Vse te določbe presegajo pospeševanje sodelovanja med pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi v smislu točke (a) člena 31(1) Pogodbe EU.
All those provisions go beyond facilitating and accelerating cooperation between competent national authorities within the meaning of point (a) of Article 31(1) of the EU Treaty.
Te določbe bodo v državah članicah zelo verjetno pospešile spremembe vsaj na področju kazenskoprocesnega prava.
They are in fact likely to necessitate changes in at least the law of criminal procedure in the Member States.
Posledično jih lahko obravnavamo kot določbe, ki skušajo zagotoviti usklajenost pravil, veljavnih v državah članicah, v smislu točke (c) člena 31(1) Pogodbe EU.
As a result, they may be considered to be designed to ensure compatibility in rules applicable in the Member States within the meaning of point (c) of Article 31(1) of the EC Treaty.
Na seji dne 22. novembra 2005 se je Odbor za pravne zadeve odločil, soglasno
At its meeting of 22 November 2005 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Giuseppe Gargani, predsednik; Rainer Wieland, podpredsednik; Antonio López-Istúriz White, pripravljavec mnenja; Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Arlene McCarthy, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Michel Rocard, Aloyzas Sakalas, Nicola Zingaretti and Tadeusz Zwiefka. , da vam priporoči, da pravna podlaga za predlagani okvirni sklep ne bi smela biti samo člen 31(1)(a) in člen 34(2)(b) Pogodbe EU, ampak tudi člen 31(1)(c).
The following were present for the vote Giuseppe Gargani (chairman), Rainer Wieland (vice-chairman), Antonio López-Istúriz White (draftsman), Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Arlene McCarthy, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Michel Rocard, Aloyzas Sakalas, Nicola Zingaretti and Tadeusz Zwiefka. , to recommend that the legal basis for the proposed framework decision should be not only Article 31(1)(a) and Article 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty, but also Article 31(1)(c).
Pobuda Kraljevine Belgije za sprejetje okvirnega sklepa Sveta o priznavanju in izvrševanju prepovedi, ki so posledica obsodb za spolne delikte nad otroci, v Evropski uniji
Initiative by the Kingdom of Belgium with a view to the adoption by the Council of a framework decision on the recognition and enforcement in the European Union of prohibitions arising from convictions for sexual offences committed against children
o prehodni ureditvi za omejevanje prostega gibanja delavcev na trgih delovne sile Evropske unije
on the transitional arrangements restricting the free movement of workers on EU labour markets
– ob upoštevanju prve alinee člena 2 Pogodbe EU,
– having regard to Article 2, first indent, of the EU Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 3(1)(c) ter člena 12 in člena 39 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 3(1)(c) and Articles 12 and 39 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o pristopu, ki so jo 16. aprila 2003 podpisale: 15 držav članic EU in Češka republika, Republika Estonija, Republika Ciper, Republika Latvija, Republika Litva, Republika Madžarska, Republika Malta, Republika Poljska, Republika Slovenija in Slovaška republika (pristopna pogodba)
– having regard to the Accession Treaty signed on 16 April 2003 between the EU-15 Member States and the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic (the Accession Treaty)
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 8. februarja 2006 z naslovom "Poročilo o delovanju prehodnih ureditev, določenih v pristopni pogodbi iz leta 2003 (obdobje od 1. maja 2004 do 30. aprila 2006) ( KOM(2006)0048 )",
– having regard to the Commission communication of 8 February 2006 entitled 'Report on the functioning of the transitional arrangements set out in the 2003 Accession Treaty (period 1 May 2004 - 30 April 2006) ( COM(2006)0048 )',
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z naslovom "Doseganje prostega gibanja delavcev v razširjeni Evropski uniji", ki jo je sprejel izvršni odbor Evropske konfederacije sindikatov na seji 5. in 6. decembra 2005,
– having regard to the resolution adopted by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) Executive Committee at its meeting of 5 and 6 December 2005, entitled 'Towards free movement of workers in an enlarged European Union',
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve (A6 0069/2006),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0069/2006 ),
A. ker je prosto gibanje delavcev ena od štirih temeljnih svoboščin Pogodbe ES ter izraz solidarnosti med članicami EU15 in novimi državami članicami in ker je prosto gibanje oseb pravica, ki pa ne sme pripeljati do masovnega pretoka delovne sile in drugih oseb,
A. whereas free movement of workers is one of the four fundamental freedoms provided for in the EC Treaty, as well as an expression of solidarity between the EU-15 and the new Member States; whereas, furthermore, the free movement of persons is a right and should not be used to promote mass movements of persons and workers,
B. ker je bila s Pogodbo o pristopu predvidena možnost uvedbe prehodne ureditve o prostem pretoku delavcev v treh korakih (2 leti + 3 leta + 2 leti),
B. whereas the Accession Treaty makes provision for the possibility of introducing transitional arrangements for the free movement of workers in three stages (2 + 3 + 2 years),
C. ker je 12 držav od petnajsterice držav članic EU maja 2004 sprejelo ukrepe, s katerimi so omejile prosti pretok delavcev iz osmih novih držav članic, v odgovor pa so prosti pretok omejile tudi tri nove države članice, ter ker sta Nemčija in Avstrija uporabili možnost omejitve prostega pretoka storitev v določenih panogah in to povezali s prehodno ureditvijo za prosti pretok delavcev,
C. whereas twelve of the EU-15 decided in May 2004 on some restriction of the freedom of movement of workers from eight of the new Member States, and in response, three of the new Member States likewise restricted freedom of movement; whereas Germany and Austria have taken up the option to restrict freedom to provide services in certain sectors and tied this to the transitional arrangements for freedom of movement of workers,
D. ker je z določbo o mirovanju opredeljeno, da v primeru, ko ena od držav EU15 v prehodnem obdobju z nacionalno zakonodajo nadzoruje dostop do trga dela, za državljane novih držav članic ne smejo veljati strožje omejitve od tistih, ki so bile v veljavi na dan podpisa Pogodbe o pristopu; ker se to pravilo uporablja za dostop, odobren na osnovi nacionalnih določb ali dvostranskih sporazumov,
D. whereas a ‘status quo clause’ stipulates that if an EU-15 Member State regulates access to its labour market under national law during the transitional period, nationals of the new Member States must not be subject to greater restrictions than those imposed on the date of signing of the Accession Treaty; whereas this rule applies to access granted under national provisions or bilateral agreements,
E. ker je z določbo o mirovanju predpisano tudi, da morajo države članice EU15 upoštevati preferenčno pravilo
E. whereas the status quo clause also requires the EU-15 to observe a preference rule
Seznam iz člena 24 Akta o pristopu: Češka republika – glej Prilogo V, odstavek 14; Republika Estonija – Priloga VI, odstavek 14; Republika Latvija – Priloga VII, odstavek 14; Republika Litva – Priloga IX, odstavek 14; Republika Madžarska – Priloga X, odstavek 14; Republika Poljska – Priloga XII, odstavek 14; Republika Slovenija – Priloga XIII, odstavek 14; Slovaška republika – Priloga XIV, odstavek 14. , v skladu s katerim velja, da imajo za prosto delovno mesto, ponujeno osebi iz države, ki ni v EU15, državljani novih držav članic prednost pred državljani tretjih držav,
List referred to in Article 24 of the Act of Accession: for Czech Republic, see Annex V, paragraph 14; for Estonia, see Annex VI, paragraph 14; for Latvia, see Annex VII, paragraph 14; for Lithuania, see Annex IX, paragraph 14; for Hungary, see Annex X, paragraph 14; for Poland, see Annex XII, paragraph 14; for Slovenia, see Annex XIII, paragraph 14; and for Slovakia, see Annex XIV, paragraph 14. whereby, when a job is offered to citizens of countries other than the EU-15, nationals of the new Member States have priority over third-country nationals,
F. ker je EU neizogibno soočena s svetovnimi izzivi, predvsem z naraščanjem moči gospodarskih akterjev, kot je Kitajska ali Jugovzhodna Azija, ter s staranjem evropskega prebivalstva, vse to pa lahko povzroči zlom financiranja sistemov socialne varnosti; ker je zaradi tega nujno potrebno, da EU postane bolj konkurenčna in da ustvari nova delovna mesta, kar zahteva povečanje mobilnosti znotraj razširjene EU,
F. whereas there are ineluctable global challenges that the EU has to face, including the growing might of economic players such as China and South-East Asia, and population ageing in Europe, which could eventually cause the financing of social security systems to collapse; whereas it is therefore vital for the EU to improve its competitiveness and create more jobs, and, to that end, increase mobility within its enlarged territory,
G. ker lizbonska strategija za rast in zaposlovanje (2005–2008) poudarja prav potrebo po uvedbi politik, ki spodbujajo poklicno in geografsko mobilnost, in ker smernica za zaposlovanje št. 20 (2005–2008)
G. whereas the Lisbon growth and employment strategy (2005-2008) points precisely to the need to implement policies to encourage occupational and geographical mobility, and whereas Guideline No 20 of the employment guidelines (2005-2008)
21). zahteva večjo odzivnost trga delovne sile z odstranitvijo ovir za mobilnost delavcev v EU v okviru Pogodb,
21). calls for the obstacles to worker mobility in the EU as a whole to be removed under the Treaties in order to make labour market more adaptable
I. ker Direktiva Sveta 2003/109/ES o statusu državljanov tretjih držav, ki so rezidenti za daljši čas,
I. whereas Council Directive 2003/109/EC concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents
J. ker imajo imetniki dovoljenja za prebivanje za daljši čas iz tretjih držav z Direktivo 2003/109/ES v določenih primerih tudi boljši status glede pravice do bivanja in dostopa do trga dela v državah EU15 kot državljani osmih novih držav članic; in s poudarkom, da izraz solidarnosti z delavci iz tretjih držav ne sme pripeljati do zapostavljanja delavcev iz novih držav članic,
J. whereas Directive 2003/109/EC also, in some cases, grants, long-term residents from third countries a more favourable status as regards their rights of residence and access to the labour markets of the EU-15 than citizens of eight of the new Member States; stressing that displaying solidarity with workers from third countries should not result in discrimination against workers from the new Member States,
K. ker morajo v skladu s preferenčnim pravilom Pogodbe o pristopu
K. whereas under the preference rule provided for in the Accession Treaty
4 Seznam iz člena 24 Akta o pristopu. države članice EU15 v primeru zaposlitve, ponujene državljanu tretje države, zagotoviti prednost državljanom novih držav članic in ker bi bile lahko nekatere določbe Direktive 2003/109/ES v navzkrižju s preferenčnim pravilom Pogodbe o pristopu,
List referred to in Article 24 of the Act of Accession. , the EU-15 have to give priority, whenever a job is offered to a third-country national, to nationals of the new Member States; and whereas a conflict could consequently arise between certain provisions of Directive 2003/109/EC and the preference rule of the Accession Treaty,
L. ker je v sporočilu Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2005 o načrtu politike zakonitega priseljevanja ( KOM(2005)0669 ) navedeno, da so za razmere na trgih dela v državah članicah EU značilne strukturne napetosti, ki se kažejo v sočasni visoki brezposelnosti in hudem pomanjkanju delovne sile, in ker je za lajšanje teh napetosti treba nujno sprejeti ukrepe za zagotavljanje večje prožnosti in varnosti, mobilnosti in bolj prilagodljive trge,
L. whereas according to the Commission communication of 21 December 2005 on Policy Plan on Legal Migration COM(2005)0669 , the Member States' labour markets are showing signs of structural strain, reflected in the fact that as well as high unemployment, there are also severe labour shortages; whereas to relieve the strain, it is essential to take steps to provide greater flexibility and security, increase mobility, and make the markets more adaptable,
M. ker je zaradi strukturnih napetosti v evropskih gospodarstvih deloma le stežka mogoče zadovoljiti povpraševanje po delovni sili v posameznih sektorjih le z rezervami domačih trgov dela,
M. whereas, because of the structural strains affecting the European economies, labour needs in individual sectors can in some cases be met only with difficulty by drawing on the reserves of the national labour market alone,
N. ker priseljevanje iz novih držav članic ugodno vpliva na gospodarstva držav članic, ki so odprle svoje trge delovne sile, saj izboljšuje konkurenčnost podjetij, znižuje stopnjo dela na črno, prispeva k večji stopnji gospodarske rasti, ustvarjanju novih delovnih mest in zagotavlja višje davčne prilive v proračune držav gostiteljic,
N. whereas migration from the new Member States is having beneficial effects on the economies of the Member States which have opened up their labour markets, as it is improving industrial competitiveness, reducing undeclared work, helping to raise economic growth rates and create more new jobs, and generating higher tax revenue for the host countries' budgets,
O. ker ne bi smeli upoštevati samo pozitivnih učinkov odprtja trgov dela v državah članicah EU15, marveč bi bilo treba preučiti tudi pozitivne in negativne učinke gospodarske migracije na nove države članice,
O. whereas not only should consideration be given to the beneficial effects of opening up labour markets in the EU-15, but an analysis should also be carried out of the positive and negative effects of economic migration on the new Member States,
P. ker delavci iz novih držav članic še vedno ne dobijo priložnosti za zakonito zaposlitev v večini držav EU15, kar je pripomoglo k nadaljnjemu razširjanju nezakonitega dela, spodbujanju sive ekonomije in izkoriščanju delavcev,
P. whereas the continued denial of opportunities for workers from the new Member States to work legally in most of the EU-15 has fuelled more illegal work, the promotion of the black economy and worker exploitation,
Q. ker je preseljevanje zelo občutljiva politična tema v EU in ker je nujno treba ustrezno obveščati evropske državljane o zakonitostih ter praktičnih in realnih posledicah prostega pretoka delavcev znotraj EU,
Q. whereas migration is a very sensitive political issue in the EU and whereas it is therefore vital to inform European citizens properly about the principles underlying, and the real practical consequences of, free movement of workers within the EU,
R. ker zaradi pomanjkanja in premajhne standardizacije podatkov o preseljevanju znotraj Skupnosti trenutno ni na voljo primernega statističnega orodja, ki bi evropskim institucijam in državam članicam omogočalo spremljanje glavnih trendov in povezanosti med dejavniki na trgih dela razširjene EU,
R. whereas because the data on migration within the Community are inadequate and have not been sufficiently standardised, there are at present no proper statistical tools that would enable the European institutions and the Member States to keep up to date with the main trends and conjunctions of circumstances on the labour markets of the enlarged EU,
S. ker razdrobljeni statistični podatki, ki so jih zbrale države članice, kažejo, da je preseljevanja znotraj držav EU15 bistveno več kot priseljevanja iz novih držav članic, tako v dejanskem številu kot tudi proporcionalno glede na aktivno populacijo; ker pritisk priseljevanja iz novih držav članic na trge delovne sile držav EU15 ni velik,
S. whereas the sketchy statistical data gathered by the Member States indicate that migration within the EU-15 is much higher than migration from the new Member States, whether expressed in absolute terms or as percentages of the working age population; whereas migration from the new Member States is not putting significant pressure on the EU-15 labour markets,
T. ker je iz statističnih podatkov držav članic razvidno, da je priseljevanja iz tretjih držav bistveno več kot preseljevanja znotraj EU, tako v petnajsterici kot tudi v razširjeni EU,
T. whereas the Member States’ statistics also show that the volume of migration from third countries far exceeds migration within the EU, whether in the EU-15 or in the enlarged EU,
U. ker je za podporo evropskih državljanov odprtju trgov dela držav članic EU15 bistveno zagotoviti spoštovanje in temeljito izvajanje evropskega in nacionalnega delovnega prava,
U. whereas to gain citizens' confidence in open labour markets in the EU-15, it is essential to ensure compliance with, and strictly enforce, EC and national labour law,
V. ker bi bil sklep zadevnih držav članic, da bodo odpravile uvedene omejitve v okviru prehodnih ureditev, jasen signal solidarnosti med državljani zahodne in vzhodne Evrope, ki so bili med sabo nekaj desetletij ločeni zaradi nesprejemljivih razlogov,
V. whereas a decision by the Member States concerned to end the restrictions imposed under the transitional regime would reflect a clear message of solidarity between citizens in Western and Eastern Europe, who have been separated for many decades on unacceptable grounds,
W. ker bo morala vsaka država članica EU15 pred 1. majem 2006 uradno obvestiti Komisijo, ali je sklenila obdržati omejevalne ukrepe za dodatno obdobje treh let,
W. whereas each EU-15 Member State will have to notify the Commission formally by 1 May 2006 whether it intends to maintain restrictions for an additional period of three years,
1. poziva države članice, da ukinejo veljavne prehodne ukrepe, saj na trgih dela držav članic, ki so se odločile za odprtje brez omejitev, ni napetosti, in ker se strah pred množičnim priseljevanjem ni izkazal za utemeljenega;
Calls on the Member States to abolish the transitional measures in force, given that there are no signs of strain on the labour markets of the Member States which have opted for openness without restrictions and that the fears of massive migration have proved groundless;
6. obžaluje, da v določenih državah članicah še vedno veljajo pravila, ki temeljijo na razlikovanju med državljani EU15 in novih držav članic, predvsem na področju socialnih ugodnosti; poziva države članice k ukinitvi teh diskriminacijskih ukrepov;
Deplores the fact that measures based on discrimination between nationals of the EU-15 and the new Member States remain in force in some Member States, not least where access to social advantages is concerned; calls on Member States to repeal these discriminatory measures;
8. izrecno poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj okrepijo prizadevanja za zagotovitev pravilnega izvajanja obstoječih pravnih predpisov ES, delovnopravnih standardov, zlasti pa določbe Direktive 96/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z napotitvijo delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev
Urges the Commission and the Member States to increase their efforts to ensure the proper enforcement of existing EC legislation, labour standards and, in particular, the provisions of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and the Council concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services
9. poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi čezmejno sodelovanje med inšpektorati za delo držav članic Evropske unije in preuči možnosti za vzpostavitev evropske mreže sodelovanja med temi organi (socialni Europol);
Calls on the Commission to intensify cross-border joint action by the Member States’ labour inspectorates and to study the possibility of setting up a corresponding European cooperation network (i.e. a social Europol);