natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Parlamentarna imuniteta ni privilegij, ki jo za lastno korist uživa posamezni poslanec, ampak predstavlja porok neodvisnosti Evropskega parlamenta in njegovih poslancev nasproti drugim organom.
Immunity is not a privilege granted to any one Member of Parliament, but rather safeguards the independence of Parliament and its Members in relation to other authorities.
Omejenost trajanja imunitete
Extent of the duration of immunity
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je bilo že dvakrat zaprošeno za tolmačenje formulacije "med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta" iz člena 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti.
The Court of Justice has twice been called upon to interpret the words ‘During the sessions of the European Parliament’ appearing in Article 10 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities.
Že iz samega namena poslanske imunitete izhaja, da imuniteta velja ves čas trajanja mandata, ne glede na to, ali gre za kazenski pregon, izvršitev kazni, izrečeno sodbo, pritožbeni postopek ali postopek z izrednimi pravnimi sredstvi.
Furthermore, its purpose implies per se that immunity must apply to Members for the entire duration of their term of office, whether a case concerning it relates to the institution of proceedings, steps to be taken in a judicial investigation, enforcement measures, judgments already delivered, or appeal proceedings or actions to have a judgment set aside.
Avtonomni značaj evropske poslanske imunitete v primerjavi z nacionalno
Independent force of the immunity of Members of the European Parliament in relation to the immunity accorded to members of national parliaments
Dejstvo, da se člen 10, prvi odstavek, pododstavek (a), Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti nanaša na imunitete poslancev nacionalnih parlamentov, še ne pomeni, da Evropski parlament ne more oblikovati lastnih pravil glede odvzema poslanske imunitete.
The fact that Article 10, first paragraph, point (a), of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities refers to the immunities accorded to members of national parliaments does not debar the European Parliament from laying down its own rules on waiver of immunity.
Z nadaljnjimi sklepi Parlamenta se je počasi izoblikovalo dosledno pojmovanje imunitete evropskih poslancev, ki je načeloma neodvisno od različnih praks nacionalnih parlamentov.
Parliament’s decisions have served gradually to shape a coherent concept of immunity specific to the European Parliament, which in principle applies independently of the various practices employed in the national parliaments.
Na ta način so odpravljene možne razlike v obravnavi poslancev iz različnih držav.
This ensures that Members are not treated differently according to their nationality.
Iz tega sledi, da Evropski parlament ne glede na obravnavo imunitete v posameznih nacionalnih zakonodajah pri sprejemanju odločitve glede odvzema ali zaščite imunitete določenega poslanca uporablja lastna dosledna načela.
Consequently, even if the immunity accorded by national law is taken into consideration, the European Parliament observes its own unchanging principles in order to determine whether or not a Member’s immunity should be waived.
Namen parlamentarne imunitete je zaščiti svobodo izražanja in svobodo do politične razprave poslancev.
Immunity is intended to protect the freedom which Members have to express their opinions and engage in political debate.
Pristojni odbor Parlamenta je vedno dosledno izhajal iz temeljnega načela, da imuniteta ne bo odvzeta v primerih, ko dejanja obtoženih poslancev tako ali drugače spadajo na področje njihovega političnega delovanja.
The committee responsible for dealing with the matter has therefore always proceeded according to the basic principle that whenever incriminated actions fall under the heading of, or are related directly to, a Member’s political activity, immunity is not waived.
To na primer vključuje mnenje, ki ga poslanec v okviru svoje politične dejavnosti izrazi med demonstracijami, javnimi shodi, v političnih publikacijah, tisku, knjigah, na televiziji, ob podpisu političnega traktata ali na sodišču.
Cases in the above category include, for example, those in which opinions deemed to form part of a Member’s political activity are expressed during demonstrations, at public rallies, in political publications, in the press, in a book, on television, through the act of signing a political tract, or even before a court of law.
Omenjeno načelo skupaj z drugimi argumenti je podlaga za odvzem oziroma zaščito imunitete, zlasti ob " fumus persecutionis ", tj. predpostavki, da se s kazenski pregonom želi škodovati politični dejavnosti poslanca.
In addition to this principle, there are other considerations which militate in favour of or against waiver of immunity, in particular the ‘fumus persecutionis’ , that is to say, the presumption that criminal proceedings stem from an intention to damage a Member’s political activity.
Kot je opredeljeno v obrazložitvi Donnezovega poročila, pojem " fumus persecutionis " v bistvu pomeni, da ne pride do odvzema imunitete tedaj, ko obstaja utemeljen sum, da se s pregonom skuša namerno škodovati politični dejavnosti določenega poslanca.
As indicated in the explanatory statement contained in the Donnez report, the concept of fumus persecutionis means essentially that immunity is not waived when it is suspected that criminal proceedings are intended at bottom to undermine the political activity of the Member concerned.
Če denimo postopek sproži politični nasprotnik, potem ob pomanjkanju nasprotnih dokazov imuniteta ne bo odvzeta, ker velja, da se s postopkom skuša škodovati poslancu in ne gre za poskus odprave krivice.
It follows that, barring evidence to the contrary, when proceedings are instituted by a political opponent, immunity is not waived if there is a compelling reason to believe that the aim of the prosecution is to harm the Member in question and not to right a wrong.
Podobno ne pride do odvzema imunitete poslancu, če je sodni postopek sprožen v okoliščinah, ki bi lahko navajale na misel, da je do postopka prišlo z izključnim namenom škodovati temu poslancu.
Similarly, when the circumstances in which proceedings have been commenced are such as to suggest that the sole purpose is to harm a Member, immunity is not waived.
UTEMELJITEV PREDLAGANE ODLOČITVE
GROUNDS FOR THE PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION
Dejanja, ki jih oporekajo Tobiasu Pflügerju, evropskemu poslancu nemške narodnosti, so se zgodila na ozemlju Zvezne republike Nemčije.
The actions of which Mr Pflüger, a German Member of the European Parliament, is accused were committed on German territory.
Poslanec Pflüger torej uživa imunitete, ki so priznane članom Bundestaga, in so opredeljene v členu 46 temeljnega zakona Zvezne republike Nemčije ( Grundgesetz ), ki navaja:
Mr Pflüger thus enjoys the immunities accorded to members of the Bundestag in the form deriving from Article 46 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (Grundgesetz) , which reads as follows:
Člen 46 [Neodgovornost in imuniteta]
Article 46 (Indemnity and immunity of deputies)
(1) Poslanca se v nobenem trenutku sme sodno ali uradno preganjati ali ga zunaj Bundestaga kako drugače klicati na zagovor zaradi njegovega glasovanja ali izjave, ki jo je dal v Bundestagu ali enem njegovih odborov (Indemnität).
(1) A deputy may not at any time be prosecuted in the courts or subjected to disciplinary action or otherwise called to account outside the Bundestag on account of a vote cast or an utterance made by him in the Bundestag or one of its committees.
To ne velja za obrekljive žalitve.
This does not apply to defamatory insults.
(2) Zaradi dejanja z možnimi kazenskimi posledicami, se lahko poslanca pokliče na zagovor ali pripre samo s privolitvijo Bundestaga, razen če je bil aretiran pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja ali naslednji dan.
(2) A deputy may be called to account or arrested for a punishable offence only by permission of the Bundestag, unless he is apprehended in the commission of the offence or during the course of the following day.
(3) Privolitev Bundestaga je potrebna tudi za vse druge primere omejevanja osebne svobode poslanca ali za uvedbo postopka proti poslancu na podlagi člena 18.
(3) The permission of the Bundestag is also necessary for any other restriction of the personal freedom of a duty or for the initiation of proceedings against a deputy under Article 18.
(4) Kazenski postopki in postopki iz člena 18, sproženi proti določenemu poslancu, njegovo pridržanje in vsaka druga omejitev osebne svobode se prekinejo na zahtevo Bundestaga.
(4) Any criminal proceedings and any proceedings under Article 18 against a deputy, any detention and any other restriction of his personal freedom shall be suspended upon the request of the Bundestag.
Člen 46 temeljnega zakona Zvezne republike Nemčije opredeljuje pojem neodgovornosti ( Indemnität ) in parlamentarne imunitete.
Article 46 of the Basic Law regulates the extent of freedom from liability (Indemnität) and of immunity.
V prvem odstavku določa, da se poslanca v nobenem trenutku ne sme sodno ali uradno preganjati ali ga zunaj Bundestaga kako drugače klicati na zagovor zaradi glasovanja ali izjave, ki jo je dal v Bundestagu ali enem njegovih odborov ( Indemnität ).
Paragraph 1 states that a deputy may not at any time be prosecuted in the courts or subjected to disciplinary action or otherwise called to account outside the Bundestag on account of a vote cast or an utterance made by him in the Bundestag or one of its committees (Indemnität) .
V drugih treh odstavkih člen navaja pravila glede parlamentarne imunitete.
Paragraphs 2 to 4 lay down rules governing immunity.
Velja še, da se lahko zaradi dejanja, za katerega je predvidena kazen, poslanca kliče na zagovor ali pripre samo z privolitvijo Bundestaga.
In addition, as far as punishable offences are concerned, a deputy may not be called to account or arrested without the permission of the Bundestag.
Prav je, da primer obravnavamo tudi v smislu člena 10(a) protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah in ob upoštevanju načel Evropskega parlamenta, ki se na osnovi večletnih izkušenj uporabljajo pri zahtevah za odvzem imunitet.
The other reference points to take into consideration are Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities and the principles laid down by the European Parliament, which have been applied, according to what has for some years been the established practice, when Parliament has dealt with requests for waiver of immunity.
V našem primeru se obtožbe proti poslancu Pflügerju in postopek preiskave proti njemu nanašajo na možno kršitev nemškega kazenskega zakonika, natančneje člena 185, člena 194, odstavek 1, člena 223, odstavek 1, člena 230, odstavek 1, prva alinea (žalitev, neprimerno ravnanje, namerne telesne poškodbe).
In the case in question here, the accusations against Mr Pflüger and the investigation concerning him relate to a possible infringement of Articles 185, 194(1), 223(1), and 230(1)(1) of the Penal Code (insulting behaviour, ill-treatment, and deliberate assault and battery).
Obtožbe proti Tobiasu Pflügerju niso takšne narave, da bi se lahko sklicevali na člen 9 protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah.
Given the nature of the accusations against Mr Pflüger, it would not be appropriate to invoke Article 9 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities (PPI).
Tudi v primeru, če se bo izkazala točnost njegovih izjav, kar poslanec Pflüger sicer odločno zanika, pa v teh izjavah ni mogoče zaslediti mnenja, ki bi ga izrazil poslanec Evropskega parlamenta pri opravljanju svojih funkcij.
Even assuming that Mr Pflüger actually said what he is alleged to have said, a charge which he categorically denies, such words cannot be treated as an opinion expressed by a Member of Parliament in the performance of his duties.
Kar zadeva uporabo člena 10(a) protokola, poročevalec meni, da dejstev, kot jih je predstavil poslanec Pflüger, ne moremo obravnavati kot "fumus persecutionis".
As regards the application of Article 10(a) PPI, the rapporteur takes the view that the facts adduced by Mr Pflüger cannot legitimately be considered to constitute ‘fumus persecutionis’ .
Četudi je gospod Pflüger prireditvi prisostvoval kot evropski poslanec in je spregovoril v javnosti, ne moremo iz tega sklepati, da se z obtožbami na njegov račun skuša namerno škodovati njegovi politični dejavnosti poslanca.
Even if Mr Pflüger attended the demonstration as a Member of the European Parliament and spoke in public, it cannot be inferred on those grounds that the accusations against him have been made in order to undermine his political activity.
Na osnovi elementov kaznivega dejanja ali postopka, ki ga vodijo pristojni organi torej ni mogoče sklepati, da bi bil poslanec žrtev namernega škodovanja ali sodnega preganjanja.
Given the offences at issue and the procedure followed by the authorities concerned, there is no evidence to suggest that anyone is seeking to persecute Mr Pflüger or hound him in the courts.
Zaradi vsega naštetega poročevalec meni, da je prav, da Evropski parlament uveljavi pravico do odvzema poslanske imunitete Tobiasu Pflügerju.
In the light of these points, the rapporteur believes that Parliament should exercise its right to waive Mr Pflüger’s immunity.
Skladno s členom 7(2) poslovnika odbor lahko predlaga sklep, ki priporoča zgolj sprejetje ali zavrnitev zahteve za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev
In accordance with Rule 7(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the committee’s proposal for a decision should simply recommend adoption or rejection of the request for the defence of immunity and privileges.
Na osnovi vseh navedenih razmišljanj in v skladu s členom 7(1) in (2) poslovnika ter po preučitvi razlogov za zaščito imunitete ali proti njej Odbor za pravne zadeve Evropskemu parlamentu priporoča, da se poslancu Tobiasu Pflügerju parlamentarna imuniteta odvzame.
In the light of the foregoing and pursuant to Rule 7(1) and (2) of the Rules of Procedure, after considering the reasons for and against waiver of immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that Parliament waive the immunity of Mr Tobias Pflüger.
Zahteva za odvzem imunitete vložil* Datum zahteve Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Request for waiver from Date of request Date announced in plenary
Ministrstvo za pravosodje Zvezne republike Nemčije 29.11.2005 15.12.2005
German Federal Ministry of Justice 29.11.2005 15.12.2005
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za stabilnost
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Instrument for Stability
Pierre Schapira , Odbor za razvoj
Pierre Schapira , Committee on Development
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................39
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................40
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI.....................................41
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS .............42
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj* .........................................................................................43
OPINION of the Committee on Development(*) ..................................................44
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................72
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................74
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................92
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................94
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0630 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0630 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2), člena 179 in člena 181a Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C6‑00251/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2), Article 179 and Article 181a of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0251/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 51 in 35 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 35 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino, Odbora za proračun in Odbora za razvoj ( A6–0157/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0157/2006 ),
Predlog Uredba Sveta o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za stabilnost
Proposal for a regulation of the Council establishing an Instrument for Stability
Predlog Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za stabilnost
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation establishing an Instrument for Stability
Ta in naslednji predlogi sprememb veljajo za pravno osnovo.
The present and following amendments concern the legal basis.
Med Svetom in Parlamentom obstaja sporazum, ki določa, da pravna osnova ne sme biti člen 308 Pogodbe ES, ampak člen 179 (Razvojno sodelovanje) in člen 181a (Gospodarsko, finančno in tehnično sodelovanje s tretjimi državami.
There is agreement between Council and Parliament that the legal basis should not be Article 308 TEC but Articles 179 (Development Cooperation) and 181a (Economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries).
Odbor za pravne zadeve je podal pozitivno mnenje, v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika.
The Legal Affairs Committee has delivered a positive opinion, in accordance with Rule 35(2).
Ta sprememba zahteva nekatere spremembe v zvezi s področjem predloga (vsi ukrepi, povezani z jedrsko varnostjo, se morajo izbrisati in bodo zajeti v ločene predloge).
This modification requires some changes to the scope of the proposal (all measures relating to nuclear safety must be deleted and will be covered by a separate proposal).
SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE JE –
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
EVROPSKI PARLAMENT IN SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE STA −
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, in zlasti člena 179 in člena 181a Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 179 and 181a thereof,
Navedba sklicevanja 4
Citation 4
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta ,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament ,
v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe ,
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty ,
(1) Da bi izboljšali učinkovitost zunanje pomoči Skupnosti, je bil oblikovan nov okvir za načrtovanje in zagotavljanje pomoči.
(1) In order to make the Community’s external aid more effective, a new framework has been devised for the planning and provision of assistance.
Uredba (ES) št. … Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne … bo vzpostavila predpristopni instrument, ki bo zajel pomoč Skupnosti za države kandidatke in možne države kandidatke.
Regulation (EC) No … of the European Parliament and of the Council of … will set up a Pre-Accession Instrument to cover Community assistance for candidate countries and potential candidate countries.
Uredba (ES) št. … Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne … bo uvedla evropski sosedski in partnerski instrument.
Regulation (EC) No … of the European Parliament and of the Council of … will introduce a European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument.
Uredba (ES) št. … Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne … je namenjena razvojnemu sodelovanju in gospodarskemu sodelovanju z drugimi tretjimi državami.
Regulation (EC) No … of the European Parliament and of the Council of … is aimed at development cooperation and economic cooperation with the other third countries.
Ta uredba je dopolnilni instrument, namenjen obravnavanju kriznih razmer in določenih globalnih dolgoročnih izzivov miru in stabilnosti ter civilne varnosti in zaščite.
The present Regulation is a complementary instrument aimed at addressing crisis situations and certain global long-term challenges to peace and stability and civilian security and safety.
Uredba (ES) št. … Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne … bo vzpostavila evropski instrument, ki bo zajel pomoč Skupnosti za tretje države za spodbujanje zaščite demokracije in človekovih pravic.
Regulation (EC) No... of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... will establish a Human Rights and Democracy Instrument.
(2) Skupnost je glavni subjekt za posredovanje gospodarske, finančne, tehnične, humanitarne in makroekonomske pomoči tretjim državam.
(2) The Community is a major provider of economic, financial, technical, humanitarian and macro-economic assistance to third countries.
Spodbujanje stabilnih pogojev za človekov razvoj in pospeševanje človekovih pravic, demokracije in temeljnih svoboščin ostaja eden od glavnih ciljev vseh instrumentov zunanje pomoči Skupnosti.
The promotion of stable conditions for human development and the promotion of human rights, democracy and fundamental freedom remains one of the prime objectives of the full range of Community external assistance instruments.
Svet je v zaključkih o učinkovitosti zunanjih ukrepov EU novembra 2004 ugotovil, da so „mir, varnost in stabilnost pa tudi človekove pravice, demokracija in dobro vodenje nujni elementi za trajnostno gospodarsko rast in izkoreninjenje revščine“.
The Council in its conclusions on the effectiveness of EU external action in November 2004 concluded that “peace, security and stability as well as human rights, democracy and good governance, are essential elements for sustainable economic growth and poverty eradication”.
Pomembno je poudariti tesno povezanost med gospodarsko rastjo in izkoreninjenjem revščine ter spodbujanjem vladavine prava in spoštovanja človekovih pravic.
It is important to stress the close relation between economic growth and poverty eradication and the promotion of the rule of law and respect of human rights.
(4) Evropski svet je zavezal Evropsko unijo , da bo učinkovit dejavnik pri kriznem upravljanju in preprečevanju nasilnih sporov.
(4) The European Council has committed the European Union to becoming an effective player in crisis management and the prevention of violent conflict.
(4) Evropska unija se je zavezala , da bo učinkovit dejavnik pri kriznem upravljanju in preprečevanju nasilnih sporov.
(4) The European Union is committed to becoming an effective player in crisis management and the prevention of violent conflict.
Ubeseditev, primerna za akt, sprejet s postopkom soodločanja.
Formulation appropriate for a co-decided act.
(7) Sporazum o partnerstvu iz Cotonouja zagotavlja integriran okvir za varnost in razvoj, zato bi moral instrument za stabilnost graditi na tem pristopu .
(7) The Cotonou Partnership Agreement provides for an integrated framework for both security and development, and the Instrument for Stability should build on this approach .
(7) Sporazum o partnerstvu AKP-EU iz Cotonouja zavezuje pogodbene stranke, da nadaljujejo aktivno, razumljivo in integrirano politiko izgradnje miru in preprečevanja sporov ter zagotavljanje ustvarjanja potrebnih povezav med takimi ukrepi in razvojem sodelovanja .
(7) The Cotonou ACP-EC Partnership Agreement commits the parties to pursue an active, comprehensive and integrated policy of peace-building and conflict prevention and resolution and to ensure the creation of the necessary links between such measures and development cooperation .
Ta predlog spremembe izraža dejansko besedilo člena 11 Sporazuma.
The amendment reflects the actual wording of Article 11 of the Agreement.