natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Soseščina in partnerstvo (ENPI)
Neighbourhood and Partnership (ENPI)
Razvojno sodelovanje (DCEC)
Development Co-op (DCEC)
Instrument stabilnosti
Stability Instrument
Jamstveni sklad za posojila
Loan Guarantee Fund
Rezerva za nujno pomoč
Emergency Aid Reserve
iz večl.fin.okvira
of MFF
Novi večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2007 – 2013, ki ga mora sprejeti Evropski parlament na majskem plenarnem zasedanju, predvideva sredstva v višini okrog 50 milijard EUR za zunanje odnose v okviru razdelka 4: "EU kot globalni partner".
The new multi-annual financial framework for 2007-2013 that is due to be adopted by the European Parliament at the May plenary session foresees resources of around EUR 50 billion for external relations under Heading 4: "The EU as a global partner".
Podatki v tabeli prikazujejo, da so v središču porabe EU na področju zunanjih odnosov še naprej "tradicionalni" izzivi.
The figures in the table highlight the continuing focus on "traditional" challenges in EU external spending.
Seveda poraba za politike, povezane z nekaterimi novimi izzivi, sodi v okvir drugih razdelkov.
Of course, spending on policies related to some of the newer challenges comes under other headings.
Na primer za "svobodo, varnost in pravico" obstaja svoj razdelek (3a), dodeljena pa so mu sredstva v višini več kot 6,5 milijarde EUR za obdobje večletnega finančnega okvira.
For example, "freedom, security and justice" has its own heading (3A) and an allocation of over EUR 6.5 billion over the MFF.
Naslednji primer v zvezi z energetsko politiko je poraba sredstev za jedrsko razgrajevanje v okviru razdelka "konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje".
Another example, in the context of energy policy, is spending on nuclear decommissioning under "competitiveness for growth and employment".
Za to bodo v obdobju večletnega finančnega okvira namenjena sredstva v višini 1,3 milijarde EUR.
This will amount to EUR 1.3 billion over the MFF.
Nekaj vprašanj za predstavitev
Some questions for the hearing
· Ali Komisija meni, da je v okviru njenih odnosov s tretjimi državami in regijami treba podati jasnejšo definicijo tega, kar predstavlja "strateški" odnos?
· Does the Commission believe that a clearer definition of what consitutes a "strategic" relationship is necessary in the context of its relations with third countries and regions?
Kakšna je v okviru tega vloga čezatlantskega partnerstva?
What is the role of the transatlantic partnership in this context?
· Kakšen bo relativni pomen "tradicionalnih" in "novih" izzivov, s katerimi se bo EU soočala v obdobju 2007 – 2013?
· What will be the relative importance of the "traditional" and "new" challenges that the EU faces over the period 2007 - 2013?
Katere nadaljnje spremembe lahko pričakujemo?
What further shifts can one anticipate?
Kako naj se razvija poraba EU prednostne naloge na področju zunanjih odnosov npr. glede varnosti oskrbe z energijo?
How should EU spending on external priorities evolve, for example as regards energy security?
· Katere ukrepe bi lahko sprejeli v proračunskem postopku za leto 2007, da bi bili razvidni ti spreminjajoči se izzivi in prednostne naloge za EU, ki je vse bolj usmerjena navzven?
· What steps can be taken in the 2007 budgetary procedure in order to reflect these changing challenges and priorities for an increasingly outward looking EU?
o SZVP in EVOP
on CFSP and ESDP
"Življenje pripada živečim in kdor živi, mora biti pripravljen na spremembe".
"Life belongs to the living, and he who lives must be prepared for changes"
Narava tega področja zajema več stebrov, SZVP in EVOP sodita v drugi steber poleg politik Skupnosti (prvi steber).
Cross-pillar nature of this area remains with CFSP/ESDP matters falling under the second pillar alongside Community policies (first pillar).
Veliko zunanjih ukrepov pokriva področje SZVP in vrsto dejavnosti iz 1. stebra, za katere je pristojna Skupnost.
In external actions, many actions span both the CFSP area and a range of 1st pillar activities where the Community is competent.
To je eden od glavnih dejavnikov, ki pojasnjuje, zakaj je tako težko imeti skladen pregled dejavnosti, ki so pogosto medsebojno povezane na posebnem področju ali celo glede posebne zadeve.
This is one main factor to explain why it is so difficult to get a coherent overview of actions that are often inter-woven in a specific area or even on a specific matter.
Ukrepi Skupnosti in SZVP se lahko dopolnjujejo, vendar tudi prekrivajo.
Community and CFSP actions can be complementing each other but, also, overlap each other.
Poleg tega se tudi na posebnem področju SZVP/EVOP zadeve nadalje zapletajo zaradi številnih virov financiranja, ker se nekateri deli financirajo iz splošnega proračuna in drugi iz držav članic.
Aditionally, even within the specific sphere of CFSP/ESDP, matters are further complicated by multiple sources of funding where some parts are financed from the general budget and others from the Member States.
V vprašanje je vključen tudi proračun Sveta.
Also, the Council's budget is involved.
Po mnenju poročevalca je za proračunski postopek 2007 potrebno pridobiti splošno sliko različnih struktur, ki so trenutno vpletene ali financirajo ukrepe SZVP/EVOP (vključno s podpornimi strukturami, kot so načrtovalne enote Sveta in zadevni odbori).
In the rapporteur's view, it is necessary to obtain, for the budget 2007 procedure, an overall picture of which structures are currently involved with/financing CFSP/ESDP actions (including support structures such as the Council's planning-cells and relevant committees)
Trenutni položaj
The current situation
Demokratičen pregled – nezadovoljiv…
Democratic scrutiny - unsatisfactory...
Evropski parlament ima skromna politična pooblastila na področju SZVP/EVOP.
The European Parliament has modest political powers in the field of the CFSP/ESDP.
Nadzorno vlogo izvaja s pravico "do obveščenosti" in pravico "do posvetovanja", ki jo določa člen 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
It carries out a supervisory role through its right ‘to be informed’ and its right ‘to be consulted’ laid down by Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
Treba je poudariti, da je dolžnost Sveta glede posvetovanja z EP o "temeljnih usmeritvah" SZVP daleč od popolnosti in da je njeno izvajanje več let bilo predmet težkih kritik, na primer zaradi dejstva, da je letno poročilo Sveta popolnoma opisnega značaja.
It should be pointed out that the duty of the Council to consult the EP on the "basic choices" of the CSFP has left a lot to be desired and its practice has come under heavy criticism for a number of years as, for example, the Council's annual report has been almost completely descriptive in nature.
S tega vidika poročevalec lahko le ponovno potrdi, da Parlament zavrača a posteriori pristop Sveta glede političnega posvetovanja in močno vztraja pri izvajanju pravic Parlamenta v skladu s Pogodbo.
In this respect, the rapporteur can only reconfirm the Parliament's rejection of the Council's "a posteriori" approach as regards this political consultation and strongly insist to fulfil the Parliament's rights under the Treaty. "
"Predsedstvo se posvetuje z Evropskim parlamentom o glavnih vidikih in temeljnih usmeritvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike ter zagotovi, da se mnenja Evropskega parlamenta ustrezno upoštevajo…" (člen 21 PES)
The Presidency shall consult the European parliament on the main aspects and the basic choices of the common and security policy and ensure that the views of the European Parliament are duly taken into consideration....."(Article 21 TEU)
V nedavnih pogajanjih o novem medinstitucionalnem sporazumu je Parlament uspel dobiti od Sveta "v prihodnost usmerjen" ( a priori pristop) dokument, "ki določa glavne vidike in osnovne usmeritve SZVP" ter vsebuje oceno ukrepov, sprejetih v preteklem letu.
In the recent negotiations on the new IIA the Parliament succeeded in obtaining from Council a forward-looking (a-priori-approach) document "setting out the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP" and an evaluation of the measures launched in the previous year.
Poročevalec meni, da je treba v sedanjem okviru sodelovanja s Svetom in Komisijo (zgrajenem okoli določb novega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma) razviti to podlago, da se okrepi kontrolna vloga Parlamenta glede političnih zadev.
Within this current framework of cooperation with Council and Commission (build around the provisions of the new IIA) the rapporteur is of the opinion that this basis must be developed to enhance the Parliament's scrutiny role on policy matters.
Druga pomembna novost v tej smeri je bila uvedba skupnih posvetovalnih sestankov v okviru političnega dialoga o SZVP.
Another important development to this end was the establishment of joint consultation meetings in the framework of political dialogue on CFSP.
Ti sestanki, prvotno uvedeni leta 2004 na podlagi dokončnega sporazuma, doseženega na usklajevalnem proračunskem sestanku novembra 2003, se bodo sedaj odvijali vsaj petkrat letno.
These are now to take place at least five times a year and were originally established as of 2004, through a final agreement in the budget conciliation meeting of November 2003.
Sestanki morajo služiti tudi za okrepitev demokratične kontrole.
These meetings should also be used to strengthen democratic control.
Evropski parlament ima kot veja proračunskega organa daljnosežne pristojnosti v zvezi s proračunom SZVP, ki jih izvršuje v skladu s členom 28 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
The European Parliament, as part of the budgetary authority, also has far-reaching budgetary powers in relation to the CFSP budget which it exercises by virtue of Article 28 of the Treaty on European Union.
Zato je treba financiranje SZVP iz splošnega proračuna, glede katerega Parlament in Svet uživata enake pravice in pristojnosti, obravnavati kot najpomembnejše sredstvo, ki ga ima Parlament na voljo za zagotavljanje demokratičnega nadzora nad to politiko.
Therefore, the financing of CFSP from the general budget, where Parliament and Council enjoy equal rights and powers, is also to be considered a most important means for the Parliament to ensure democratic control over this policy.
To nalogo še podkrepi dejstvo, da so izdatki za SZVP klasificirani kot "neobvezni" in je torej Parlament tisti, ki dokončno odobri sredstva za naslednje leto.
It is even the case, since expenditure for CFSP is classified as "non-compulsory", that the Parliament has a strong role as it adopts the final appropriations for the following year.
Z novim osnutkom medinstitucionalnega sporazuma bosta EP in Svet vseeno dosegla splošni sporazum o financiranju za obdobje 2007–2013 o višini odobrenih sredstev za SZVP.
In terms of the new draft IIA, the EP and Council will nevertheless have reached a global agreement of funding for the period 2007-2013 concerning the level of CFSP appropriations.
Institucije bodo to seveda morale upoštevati, dokler bodo pogodbenice sporazuma.
The institutions will of course be bound by this as long as they are party to the IIA.
Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija se strinjajo, da se vsaj 1.740 milijonov EUR da na voljo za SZVP v obdobju 2007–2013 in da znesek za ukrepe, vključene v člen, naveden v tretji alinei, ne sme presegati 20 % celotnega zneska proračunskega poglavja o SZVP.
The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agree that at least EUR 1.740 million will be available for the CFSP over the period 2007-2013 and that the amount for actions entered under the article mentioned in the third indent may not exceed 20 % of the overall amount of the CFSP budget chapter
To ustreza v povprečju približno 250 milijonom letno.
this corresponds to about 250m/year on average.
PPP predlaga za leto 2007 159 milijonov EUR.
The PDB for 2007 proposes EUR 159 million.
Odobrena proračunska sredstva so leta 2006 znašala 102 milijona.
Appropriations in 2006 were 102 million.
Med finančno strukturo ukrepov in možnostjo izvajanja demokratičnega nadzora obstaja jasna povezava.
There is a clear link between the financing structure of actions and the possibility to exercise democratic control.
V številnih primerih danes velja, da Evropski parlament lahko nadzoruje del ukrepa na podlagi prejetih finančnih izkazov.
In several cases, today, it is the case that part of an action can be scrutinised by the European Parliament on the basis of financial statements received.
Drugi del istega ukrepa lahko nadzorujejo nacionalni parlamenti (pod pogojem, da so vzpostavljene potrebne strukture med Svetom/vladami/nacionalnimi parlamenti).
Another part of the same action might be scrutinised by national parliaments (provided the necessary structures between Council/governments/national parliaments are in place).
Ne moremo trditi, da to dopušča izvoljenim predstavnikom možnost ovrednotenja ukrepov SZVP/EVOP v celotnem obsegu.
Where does this leave any possible assessment by elected representatives as to the full scope of these CFSP/ESDP actions?
To je pomembno in mogoče zaskrbljujoče vprašanje.
It is a relevant, and perhaps worrying, question to ask.
Poročevalec poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti nadzor financiranja s strani predstavnikov evropskih davkoplačevalcev na nacionalni ravni, če je financiranje izvedeno le na nacionalni osnovi, in tudi na evropski ravni, če se ukrepi SZVP delno ali v celoti financirajo prek proračuna EU.
The rapporteur emphasises that scrutiny of financing by the representatives of the European taxpayers has to be guaranteed, either at national level, if the financing is made purely on a national basis, or at European level, if CFSP actions are funded in part or in full through the EU budget.
Novi medinstitucionalni sporazum
The new Inter-institutional Agreement
Novi osnutek medinstitucionalnega sporazuma gradi in utrjuje, kar je bilo predhodno doseženo z zadnjim medinstitucionalnim sporazumom, skupno izjavo iz leta 2002 in izmenjavo pisem med predsednikom Odbora za proračun in predsedstvom Sveta za vzpostavitev "skupnih informacijskih sestankov" v proračunskem postopku 2004 in "nadgradnjo" predstavništva Sveta na ravni ambasadorjev med proračunskim postopkom 2006.
The new draft IIA builds and consolidates what had previously been achieved in the last IIA, the joint declaration of 2002, and the exchange of letters between the Budgets Committee chairman and the Council Presidency to set of the "joint information meetings" in the 2004 budget procedure and the "upgrading" of Council representation to Ambassador level in the course of the 2006 budget procedure.
Te določbe o posvetovanju in političnem dialogu so posebnega pomena za Parlament, saj lahko okrepijo politično udeležbo in demokratičen nadzor v sektorju, v katerem so do sedaj finančni elementi pogosto bili edini vir informacij.
These provisions on consultation and political dialogue are of particular importance for Parliament as they might introduce further political participation and democratic control of a sector in which, so far, points on financial elements have often constituted the only source of information.
Lahko bi celo trdili, da je ta politika bila na splošno zasnovana in izvajana le prek sej na medvladni ravni, ne da bi jo zares nadzoroval parlamentarni organ na nacionalni ravni ali na ravni EU.
One might even say that, by and large, this policy was often conceived and implemented purely at intergovernmental-level meetings without really being scrutinised by a parliamentary body either at national or at EU level.
Glavne točke medinstitucionalnega sporazuma so:
The main points of the IIA are:
a) sporazum o zagotovitvi vsaj 1.740 milijonov EUR za obdobje 2007–2013 (v povprečju približno 250 milijonov letno);
a) Agreement to provide at least EUR 1 740 million for the period 2007-2013 (i.e. an average of about 250 million per year)
c) znesek, ki ni višji od 20 % omenjenega zneska, se lahko vključi v proračun za nujne ukrepe (nepredvidene);
c) An amount no higher than 20% of this may be budgeted for emergency measures (unforeseen)
d) predsedstvo Sveta do 15. junija posreduje "v prihodnost usmerjeno" letno poročilo, ki vključuje finančne posledice in oceno sprejetih ukrepov;
d) transmission by Council Presidency of a forward-looking annual report by 15 June, including the financial implications and an evaluation of the measures launched
f) ohranitev določb o četrtletnih poročilih in posredovanje s strani Sveta finančnih poročil v petih dneh po sklepu o ukrepih na področju SZVP.
f) Maintenance of provisions on quarterly reports and the transmission of financial statements within 5 days following a decision on a CFSP action by the Council.
Ohranitev proračunske strukture (glej prilogo 1).
Maintenance of the budgetary structure (see annex 1)
Financiranje SZVP
Financing of the CFSP
Mogoče najpomembnejši trend je povezan z večjim številom operacij kriznega upravljanja s civilnimi in tudi vojaškimi sestavinami.
The perhaps most important trend relates to the increase of crisis-management operations with both civil and military components.
To pomeni, da je postalo še pomembneje kot kdajkoli razjasniti financiranje v zvezi s tem vidikom.
This means that it has become even more important than ever to clarify the financing in this respect.
Trenutni položaj
Current situation
Civilne operacije so bile ali so financirane iz proračuna SZVP, medtem ko so bile operacije vojaškega ali obrambnega značaja financirane na osnovi načela "costs lie where they fall" ( vsak prevzame lastne stroške ) , to pomeni s strani držav članic.
Civilian missions are/have been financed under the CFSP budget whilst missions with military or defence implications have been funded under the principle of 'costs lie where they fall', that is from Member States.
Nekateri stroški, opredeljeni kot "skupni stroški", se lahko upravljajo s tako imenovanim mehanizmom Atena.
Some costs which are defined as 'common costs' can be managed under the so-called Athena mechanism.
Svet meni, da je treba civilne sestavne dele (financirane iz proračuna) narediti prilagodljivejše in omogočiti hitrejše postopke, vključno z možnostjo učinkovitejšega financiranja operacij za zagon in operacij za ugotavljanje dejstev.
The Council believes that the civilian components (financed from the budget) need to be made more flexible and to allow for quicker procedures, including as well the possibility of more effective funding of start-up missions and fact-finding missions.
Z vidika Parlamenta je bilo pogosto poudarjeno, da so možnosti financiranja številne in kompleksne ter da redko omogočajo ocenjevanje skladnosti in učinkovitosti.
From the Parliament's point of view, it has frequently been pointed out that the number of funding options possible is complex, rarely allowing for the possibility to assess coherence and effectiveness.
Na kratko, politične in proračunske analize so otežkočene.
In short, making political and budgetary analyses difficult.
Prilagodljivost postopkov mora biti pretehtana tudi z vidika preglednosti in odgovornosti.
The flexibility of procedures must also be weighed against openness and accountability.
Poročilo Parlamenta o glavnih vidikih in temeljnih usmeritvah SZVP (Brokovo poročilo) priporoča "skupne stroške" za prihodnje vojaške operacije v okviru EVOP, ki naj se financirajo iz proračuna EU, in opustitev obstoječega sistema dopolnilnih proračunov ali sredstev za zagon držav članic.
The Parliament's report on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP (Brok report) calls for 'joint costs' of future military operations in the framework of ESDP to be financed from the EU budget, discontinuing the existing arrangement of Member States subsidiary budgets or start-up funds
Ali novi medinstitucionalni sporazum izboljšuje obstoječe stanje?
Does the new IIA improve matters?
Novi medinstitucionalni sporazum ne vsebuje novih "samodejnih" določb, ki bi nemudoma rešile težavo.
The new IIA does not contain any new "automatic" provisions that would immediately solve the problem.
Vendar bi morale obstoječe določbe, zahvaljujoč nenehnim prizadevanjem Parlamenta v zadnjih treh letih, omogočiti novo obdobje graditve zaupanja med omenjenima institucijama in zagotoviti nadaljnji napredek.
However, the provisions in place, thanks to the continued efforts of the Parliament over the last three to four years, should allow for a new phase of confidence-building between the respective institutions and allow for further progress.
Besedilo skupne izjave z dne 25. novembra 2002 navaja, da Svet "dovolj zgodaj in v okviru rednega političnega dialoga obvešča o ukrepih SZVP, ki lahko imajo pomembne finančne posledice".
According to the text of the joint Declaration of 25 November 2002, the Council shall give ' early warning in the context of the regular political dialogue on CFSP actions which might have important financial implications’.
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da Svet v prejšnjih letih ni v celoti upošteval te določbe, in poudarja, da je tovrstno stanje treba izboljšati.
The rapporteur notes that the Council has not fully complied with this provision over the past years and stresses the need for improvement.
Posvetovalne seje, ki bi morale potekati petkrat letno, je treba izkoristiti prav v te namene.
Naturally, the consultation meetings to be held five times a year should be used to this end.
Treba je poudariti, da bi lahko besedilo medinstitucionalnega sporazuma glede obveznosti Sveta, da Evropskemu parlamentu posreduje finančne izkaze, zajemalo vse sklepe SZVP, ki imajo za posledico odhodke, tj. ne samo odhodkov iz proračuna EU.
It should be pointed out that the text of the IIA as regards the Council's obligation to provide the European Parliament with financial statements could in fact apply to all decisions relating to the CFSP entailing expenditure, i.e. not only expenditure from the EU budget.
Obe instituciji sta v zvezi s tem ponujali različne razlage, tako je Svet leta 2002 izrazil mnenje, da ta obveznost velja le za odhodke iz proračuna EU.
There has been a difference of interpretation between the two institutions in which the Council claimed (in 2002) that it was valid only when expenditure from the EU budget was involved.
Vendar se besedilo glasi " kadar Svet sprejme sklep na področju SZVP, ki ima za posledico odhodke, vedno takoj, najpozneje pa pet delovnih dni".
However, the text reads "...whenever it adopts a decision in the field of CFSP entailing expenditure, then council will immediately and in each case no later than five working days....".
To bi pomenilo, da bi moral podrobnejši prikaz stanja obveščati o sklepih/odhodkih, ki so v pristojnosti držav članic.
This would certainly imply that also decisions/expenditure falling to the member States should be provided to give a more complete picture.
V ta okvir, zlasti z ozirom na njegov finančni vidik, vse bolj sodi tudi najzahtevnejše finančno posredovanje Unije, tj. njeni programi pomoči in drugi instrumenti Skupnosti na področju zunanje politike.
Also in financing terms, there are gradually ever more links to the Union's largest financial interventions, i.e. its aid programmes and other Community instruments in the external field.
Vendar ni vselej "popolnoma jasno", ali se lahko določen ukrep financira v okviru instrumenta iz prvega ali drugega stebra (na primer odstranjevanje min, nujna civilna pomoč, človekove pravice, vzpostavitev institucij, spremljanje volitev, utrjevanje demokracije in pravne države).
However, it is not always "clear-cut" as to whether an action can be financed under a 1st pillar instrument or under the 2nd pillar (for example, mine-clearance, civilian emergency assistance, human rights, institution building, election monitoring, consolidation of democracy and the rule of law).
V takšni operativni in proračunski "sivi coni" povezanost med SZVP in "običajnimi" ukrepi zunanje politike jasno govori v prid zahtevam po večji usklajenosti med politikami in ukrepi, ki so razdeljeni med prvim in drugim stebrom.
In what may be described as a "grey-zone" in both operational and budgetary terms, the links between CFSP and ‘traditional’ external actions clearly justify the request for greater consistency between policies and actions devised under the first and second pillars.