natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tukaj gre torej za nalogo, ki jo ustava dodeljuje organom, da natančneje opredelijo strukturo institucij Evropske unije.
What is involved, therefore, is a constitutional duty of the institutions to flesh out the Union’s institutional structure.
To poročilo je prispevek Odbora za ustavne zadeve k izpolnitvi te naloge.
By producing this report the Committee on Constitutional Affairs is making its own contribution to help accomplish the task.
A. ker Komisija po preverjanju zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo, načrtuje umik 68 predlogov, ki jih ocenjuje za neskladne z lizbonskimi cilji ali z načeli bolje oblikovanih predpisov;
A. whereas, as an outcome of its screening of pending legislation, the Commission is envisaging the withdrawal of 68 proposals regarded as inconsistent with the Lisbon objectives or Better Regulation principles,
C. ker na splošno velja, da ima Komisija v skladu s členom 250(2) Pogodbe ES pravico umakniti predloge, ki čakajo na obravnavo, dokler Svet ne odloči o njih, in ker v postopku soodločanja ta določba omogoča umik predloga, vse dokler v Evropskem parlamentu ni zaključena prva obravnava in "zapečatena" s sprejetjem skupnega stališča Sveta,
C. whereas it is commonly believed that the Commission has the right to withdraw pending proposals, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty, as long as the Council has not acted, and that, within the codecision procedure, that provision allows such withdrawal as long as the first reading has not been completed within the European Parliament and ‘sealed’ by the Council’s adoption of a common position,
D. ker je treba člen 250(2) Pogodbe ES, čeprav je bil izvorno sestavljen za postopek posvetovanja, razlagati v luči in duhu člena 251 te pogodbe in ker posledično s tem ne sme biti nikdar ogrožen položaj Evropskega parlamenta v procesu odločanja,
D. whereas Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty, although originally conceived for the consultation procedure, has to be interpreted in the light and in the spirit of Article 251 of that Treaty and whereas, as a result, it can never compromise the position of the European Parliament within the decision-making process,
E. ker je za primere, ko je po prvi obravnavi sprejeto skupno stališče, v tretji alinei drugega pododstavka člena 251(2) Pogodbe ES Komisiji dovoljeno, da Evropski parlament obvesti o svojem stališču, medtem ko je v primeru, da Parlament naknadno spremeni skupno stališče, v točki (c) tretjega pododstavka člena 251(2) Komisiji dovoljeno zgolj, da poda mnenje, na podlagi česar je jasno, da Komisija ni več "lastnica" svojega predloga in ga ne more umakniti,
E. whereas, whenever a common position is adopted after the first reading, the third indent of the second subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty only allows the Commission to inform the European Parliament of its own position and whereas, if the common position is subsequently amended by Parliament, point (c) in the third subparagraph of Article 251(2) only allows the Commission to deliver an opinion, so that it is clear that the Commission is no longer the ‘owner’ of its proposals and is not free to withdraw them,
F. ker v vsakem primeru v skladu s členom 10 Pogodbe ES načelo resničnega sodelovanja Komisiji omogoča umik predlogov samo takrat, ko s tem ne vpliva na vlogo in pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta kot demokratičnega sprejemalca odločitev,
F. whereas in any case, pursuant to Article 10 of the EC Treaty, the principle of genuine cooperation allows the Commission to withdraw its proposals only if this does not affect the role and the competence of the European Parliament as a democratic decision-maker,
2. poziva Komisijo, naj spoštuje načelo resničnega sodelovanja, kadar Evropski parlament na podlagi člena 55 svojega Poslovnika prosi Komisijo, naj umakne svoj predlog;
Calls on the Commission to respect the principle of genuine cooperation whenever, pursuant to Rule 55 of its own Rules of Procedure, the European Parliament asks the Commission to withdraw its proposals;
4. poziva Komisijo, da se posvetuje z Evropskim parlamentom glede vsakega predloga, ki ga Komisija namerava umakniti, in da čim bolj upošteva mnenje Parlamenta; poziva Komisijo, da v vsakem primeru obravnava Parlament in Svet kot enakopravna;
Invites the Commission to consult the European Parliament in respect of each proposal which the Commission intends to withdraw and to take Parliament’s opinion into the fullest consideration; invites the Commission, in any case, to treat Parliament and the Council on equal terms;
a) predlog uredbe o statutu evropskega združenja (COD/1991/0386)
(a) proposal for a regulation on the Statute for a European association (COD/1991/0386)
UL C 99, 21.4.1992, str.
OJ C 99, 21.4.1992, p.
b) predlog Direktive o dopolnitvi tega statuta z vidika vloge zaposlenih (COD/1991/0387)
(b) proposal for a directive supplementing that Statute with regard to the involvement of employees (COD/1991/0387)
c) predlog uredbe o statutu evropske vzajemne družbe (COD/1991/0390)
(c) proposal for a regulation on the Statute for a European mutual society (COD/1991/0390)
d) predlog direktive o dopolnitvi tega statuta z vidika vloge zaposlenih (COD/1991/0391)
(d) proposal for a directive supplementing that Statute with regard to the involvement of employees (COD/1991/0391)
Rezultati preverjanja zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo
The outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator
Pripravljavka mnenja Datum imenovanja
Drafts(wo)man Date appointed
vsi 17.11.2005
All 17.11.2005
o sklenitvi medinstitucionalnega sporazuma (MIS) o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
on the conclusion of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
ANNEX: INTERINSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION ON BUDGETARY DISCIPLINE AND SOUND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 10
– ob upoštevanju osnutka medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, priloženega temu sklepu,
– having regard to the draft Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management annexed to this decision,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets
Poročilo Böge (A6-0000/2006) ,
Report Böge (A6-0000/2006) ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 120(1) poslovnika, točk (1) in (2) oddelka IV ter točke (4) oddelka XVIII priloge VI tega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 120(1) of its Rules of Procedure and to Section IV, points (1) and (2), and Section XVIII, point (4), of Annex VI thereto,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0144/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0144/2006 ),
A. so Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija zaključili pogajanja o novem medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka za obdobje 2007-2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu "osnutek sporazuma"),
A. the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission have concluded negotiations on a new Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management for the period 2007-2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the draft agreement’),
B. poročilo Odbora za proračun pozitivno ocenjuje politične in finančne izbire, ki jih vsebuje osnutek sporazuma,
B. the report of the Committee on Budgets gives a positive assessment of the political and financial choices made in the draft agreement,
C. osnutek sporazuma ne ustvarja nobenih težav glede neskladnosti s primarno evropsko zakonodajo in v celoti spoštuje proračunske pristojnosti Parlamenta,
C. the draft agreement does not seem to raise any problems of incompatibility with primary European law and fully respects the budgetary prerogatives of Parliament,
D. ni osnutek sporazuma z nobenega vidika v nasprotju s poslovnikom Parlamenta; vendar se lahko postavi vprašanje, ali bi bilo primerno sprejeti nekaj predlogov sprememb k poslovniku, zlasti k njegovi prilogi IV, da bi omogočili sodelovanje Parlamenta pod najboljšimi možnimi pogoji v številnih posebnih postopkih, ki jih predvideva osnutek sporazuma; to bi zlasti lahko veljalo za postopke, ki zadevajo:
D. the draft agreement does not seem to conflict in any respect with Parliament's Rules of Procedure; however, the question may be raised as to whether it would not be prudent to make some amendments to the Rules of Procedure, in particular to Annex IV thereto, in order to allow Parliament's involvement in a number of specific procedures provided for in the draft agreement to take place under the best possible conditions; this could in particular be the case as regards the procedures concerning:
– prilagoditve v zvezi s čezmernimi javnofinančnimi primanjkljaji,
– adjustments connected with excessive government deficits,
– revizijo finančnega okvira,
– revision of the financial framework,
– uporabo rezerve za nujno pomoč,
– mobilisation of the Emergency Aid Reserve,
– uporabo sredstev Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije,
– mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund,
– uporabo instrumenta prilagodljivosti,
– mobilisation of the Instrument of Flexibility,
– uporabo sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji,
– mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund,
– prilagoditev finančnega okvira za potrebe širitve,
– adjustment of the financial framework to cater for enlargement,
To je vsebina poročila Odbora za proračun, katerega poročevalec g.
Approves the text of the draft agreement annexed to this decision;
Nekaj vprašanj glede glasovalne večine
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Govorimo o ponovni preučitvi obstoječega finančnega okvira, ne o nadomestilu le-tega z novim, in izkušnje kažejo, kako malo verjeten je ponovni pregled v teh pogojih.
The content of the future report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the Interinstitutional Agreement
Najmodreje bi bilo ohraniti posebni postopek odločanja, ki ga predvideva točka 3 MIS (kvalificirana večina v Svetu in absolutna večina poslancev ter 3/5 oddanih glasov v Parlamentu) za vsako spremembo MIS (do ali nad 0,03 %), ter predlagati poenostavljen postopek za revizije, povezane z majhnimi zneski (do xxx milijonov), v okviru katerih bi na primer Svet odločal o obveznih izdatkih, Parlament pa o neobveznih izdatkih v skladu s predpisi iz člena 272 Pogodbe in finančne uredbe.
The content of this report on the new Interinstitutional Agreement on Budgetary Discipline (IIA), which includes the new Financial Framework (FF - new terminology for the until now called Financial Perspective) for the period 2007-2013, is to analyse its institutional and procedural implications and in particular to judge of its compatibility with primary law and to evaluate the eventual need for modifications of the rules of Procedure to allow for its smooth implementation.
evropski parlament, svet evropske unije in komisija evropskih skupnosti,
To assist him in those hard negotiations, our committee produced a Working Document
v nadaljevanju "institucije",
Only available in English
– del III vsebuje določbe v zvezi z dobrim finančnim poslovodenjem sredstev EU.
Compatibility of the IIA with the Treaties and the Rules of Procedure
Rezultati teh tristranskih pogovorov se uskladijo v spravnem postopku med Svetom in delegacijo Evropskega parlamenta, pri čemer sodeluje tudi Komisija.
The goal of this point is precisely to state the engagement of the institutions to do so in order to comply with the FF they agreed on, and this is essential for Parliament.
Če v tristranskih pogovorih ni določeno drugače, spravni sestanek poteka na tradicionalnem sestanku med istimi udeleženci na dan, ki ga zastavi Svet za določitev predloga proračuna.
The rapporteur would prefer that it be clear in the final text that the refusal of one of the Institutions to proceed in accordance with this clause would constitute a serious breach of the engagements assumed by the institutions in the IIA, and consequently of the principle of loyal cooperation, which would put the whole IIA into question.
Po potrebi se lahko na pisni predlog Komisije ali pa na pisno prošnjo predsednika Odbora Evropskega parlamenta za proračun ali predsednika Sveta (proračun) pred prvo obravnavo v Evropskem parlamentu skliče nov tristranski sestanek.
This review will be much more than a simple revision of the FF, it may imply a complete overhaul of the present IIA structure and it will very likely imply also proposals for modification of the present Own Resources system.
Odločitev o sklicu tega tristranskega sestanka sprejmejo institucije po sprejetju predloga proračuna Sveta in pred glasovanjem o spremembah na prvi obravnavi Odbora Evropskega parlamenta za proračun.
Parliament should be associated to this procedure since its beginning, eventually through an interinstitutional working group.
Institucije nadaljujejo spravni postopek po prvi obravnavi proračuna v vsaki od obeh vej proračunskega organa, da bi dosegli dogovor o obveznih in neobveznih odhodkih ter zlasti da bi razpravljali o pisnem predlogu spremembe iz točke B.
The duration of the Financial Framework
Tristranski sestanek v ta namen se skliče po prvi obravnavi v Evropskem parlamentu.
This question of the wide ranging review of the IIA may eventually be associated with the question of the duration of the FF, as in 2009 there will be a new Parliament and a new Commission.
O rezultatih tristranskih pogovorov se razpravlja na drugem spravnem sestanku, ki se skliče na dan druge obravnave v Svetu.
For a long time, Parliament has insisted that the financial framework should as much as possible match the mandate of the Parliament and of the Commission.
Na teh tristranskih sestankih vodijo delegacije institucij predsednik Sveta (proračun), predsednik Odbora Evropskega parlamenta za proračun in član Komisije, pristojen za proračun.
As such, every Parliament and every Commission would have its word to say concerning the financial priorities of their mandates (or a substantial part of it).
Del D.
The same goes for the Commission.
Da bi lahko Komisija pravočasno ocenila izvedljivost sprememb, ki jih proračunski organ predvidi in, ki povzročijo nove ali podaljšanje obstoječih pripravljalnih ukrepov/pilotnih projektov, obe veji proračunskega organa o svojih namerah v zvezi s tem obvestita Komisijo do sredine junija v zvezi s tem, tako da na prvi obravnavi v Svetu že lahko steče prva razprava.
To avoid this situation - elected representatives of the citizens should be responsible for the main financial decisions taken during its mandate, in order to be accountable towards their electorate - the Constitution had foreseen (article III-402, paragraph 1) that the Multiannual Financial Framework would have a duration of "at least 5 years" (a certain flexibility is advisable in these matters).
Uporabljajo se tudi nadaljnji koraki spravnega postopka, predvideni v delu C, in določbe o izvedljivosti iz točke 36.
The resolution on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union
Po potrebi Komisija predlaga ustrezne ukrepe.
Some questions concerning majorities
Ta pregled mora spremljati ocena delovanja Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
The difficulties in obtaining an agreement in the Council during last year showed the limits of this method of decision.
Evropski parlament je vključen v ta pregled na vseh stopnjah njegovega postopka na podlagi naslednjih določb:
We are talking about reviewing the existing FF, not replacing it by a new one, and experience shows how unlikely a review in those terms it is.
– ko Komisija predloži pregled, sledi faza preverjanja, v kateri se zagotovijo ustrezne razprave z Evropskim parlamentom na podlagi običajnega političnega dialoga med institucijami in ustrezno upoštevanje stališč Parlamenta;
The wisest thing to do would be to keep the particular procedure of decision foreseen in Point 3 of the IIA (qualified majority in the Council and absolute majority of members and 3/5 of the votes cast in the Parliament) to any review of the IIA (up to or above 0,03%), and propose a simplified procedure for revisions concerning small amounts (up to xxx millions), in which, for ex., the Council would decide on compulsory expenses, and the Parliament on non-compulsory expenses, according to the rules foreseen in article 272 of the Treaty and the Financial Regulation.
– Evropski svet v skladu s svojimi sklepi iz decembra 2005 „lahko sprejema odločitve o vseh zadevah, ki jih pregled obravnava“.
This could even be accompanied by a tighter definition on Point 21 of the circumstances in which such a revision can take place.
Evropski parlament je udeležen pri vseh formalnih nadaljnjih ukrepih v skladu z ustreznimi postopki in s popolnim spoštovanjem njegovih uveljavljenih pravic.
The council did not accept this logic this time, but Parliament could consider this proposal in a future revision of the IIA.
Prav tako si v zadnji fazi pogajanj o spremembi Finančne uredbe in njenih izvedbenih pravil čim bolj prizadevajo za pravo ravnovesje med zaščito finančnih interesov, načelom sorazmernosti upravnih stroškov in uporabniku prijaznimi postopki.
It seems perfectly legitimate that the European Parliament wishes to gather a strong majority of its members to engage itself politically in an agreement with the other institutions that will to some extent result in a self-restriction in the use of the prerogatives that the Treaties vested on him.
Revizija Finančne uredbe se izvede na podlagi spremenjenega predloga Komisije po spravnem postopku, določenem v Skupni izjavi Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z dne 4. marca 1975, in sicer v duhu, ki je omogočil, da je bil dosežen sporazum v letu 2002.
To this extent it would be convenient that this political will of the Parliament be translated in the text of the agreement through a specific clause or in a declaration in which the other institutions acknowledge this position stated by the Parliament.
Izjava Komisije o spremembi Finančne uredbe
Transitional provisions in the event that the Constitution enters into force
V okviru revizije Finančne uredbe se Komisija zavezuje:
The report stresses (Paragraph 5) the convenience of foreseeing a specific transitional system for the eventual entrance into force of the Constitutional Treaty during the period of this FF.
– da bo Evropski parlament in Svet obvestila, če meni, da se je v predlogu zakonodajnega akta treba oddaljiti od določb Finančne uredbe, ter navedla natančne razloge za to;
In fact, the Constitutional Treaty deeply modifies the rules on own resources, financial framework and annual budgetary procedure, as well as their interrelation.
– da bo zagotavljala redne ocene zakonodajnega učinka, in sicer ob ustreznem upoštevanju načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, pri pomembnih zakonodajnih predlogih in vseh bistvenih spremembah teh predlogov.
In the rapporteur's opinion, the IIA should address, for instance, the question of how the Institutions should proceed to pass from the IIA to the future European law containing the Multiannual Financial Framework, etc.
Izjava o novih finančnih instrumentih
Other questions
Evropski parlament je seznanjen s sklepi Evropskega sveta iz decembra 2005 o prostovoljni modulaciji iz vsote iz odhodkov, povezanih s trgom, in neposrednih plačil Skupne kmetijske politike v razvoj podeželja do največ 20 % ter o zmanjšanju za tržne odhodke.
The rapporteur congratulates himself with the progress made during the negotiations, thanks to the efforts of the Parliament's negotiators, on other questions, notably:
Evropski parlament izraža zaskrbljenost glede sklepov Evropskega sveta iz decembra 2005 v zvezi z zmanjšanjem odhodkov, povezanih s trgom, in neposrednih plačil Skupne kmetijske politike in posledicah tega na sofinanciranje Skupnosti za omrežje Natura 2000.
– the need to ensure an adequate funding of eventual additional expenditure on the area of freedom, security and justice (i.e. the funding of Europol by the EU budget) that ensures Parliament's rights (Declaration of the European Parliament);
Meni, da bi moralo imeti vključevanje omrežja Natura 2000 v strukturne sklade in Sklad za razvoj podeželja ustrezno prednost.
– the review of the Financial Regulation (Point 45 and declarations two annexed to the IIA).
Sklenitev medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka
Conclusion of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
Jacek Protasiewicz in György Schöpflin
Jacek Protasiewicz, György Schöpflin
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1673/2000 glede pomoči za predelavo lanu in konoplje, ki se ju goji za vlakna, in Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 glede konoplje, upravičene do sheme enotnega plačila
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000, as regards the processing aid for flax and hemp grown for fibre, and Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, as regards hemp eligible for the Single Payment Scheme
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0125 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0125 )
– ob upoštevanju tretjega pododstavka člena37(2) pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0119/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37(2), third subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0119/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6–0145/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0145/2006 ),
Predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1673/2000 glede pomoči za predelavo lanu in konoplje, ki se ju goji za vlakna, in Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 glede konoplje, upravičene do sheme enotnega plačila
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000, as regards the processing aid for flax and hemp grown for fibre, and Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, as regards hemp eligible for the Single Payment Scheme
o Skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution
– ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta (12062/1/2005 – C6‑0055/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (12062/1/2005 – C6‑0055/2006 ),
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0145 o predlogu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0550 )
Adopted Texts, P6_TA(2005)0145 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0550 )
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0282 )
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0282 )
– ob upoštevanju odstavka 2 člena 251 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano za drugo obravnavo ( A6‑0146/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0146/2006 ),
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem in poslabšanjem
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 1 s prve obravnave, ki je bil sprejet 28. aprila 2005.
Reinstatement of Amendment 1 from the first reading, adopted on 28 April 2005.
Za evropsko vodno politiko sta osrednjega pomena previdnostno načelo in zmanjšanje onesnaževanja.
The precautionary principle and the minimisation of pollution are central to European water policy.
Zato je potrebno pojasnilo, da direktiva obravnava varstvo podzemne vode ne le pred onesnaževanjem, ampak tudi pred poslabšanjem.
Accordingly, clarification is needed that the directive deals with the protection of groundwater against both pollution and deterioration.
Razlikovanje med preventivo in vzpostavitvijo prvotnega stanja je bilo očitno narobe razumljeno.
The distinction between prevention and restoration has clearly not been properly understood.