natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če je enota, ki nadzoruje, fizična oseba, ki ni gospodarski subjekt, je evidentiranje odvisno od razpoložljivosti te informacije v upravnih virih
If the controlling unit is a natural person, who is not an economic operator, recording is subject to the availability of this information in the administrative sources
Deloma obvezno
Part conditional
Obvezno, če je enota, ki nadzoruje, fizična oseba, ki ni gospodarski subjekt, je evidentiranje odvisno od razpoložljivosti te informacije v upravnih virih
Conditional If the controlling unit is a natural person, who is not an economic operator, recording is subject to the availability of this information in the administrative sources
Vrsta skupine podjetij:
Type of enterprise group:
1. rezidenčna skupina;
1. all-resident group;
2. okrnjena skupina pod domačim nadzorom;
2. domestically controlled truncated group;
3. okrnjena skupina pod tujim nadzorom;
3. foreign controlled truncated group;
Datum začetka delovanja rezidenčne/okrnjene skupine podjetij
Date of commencement of the resident/truncated enterprise group
Datum ukinitve rezidenčne/okrnjene skupine podjetij
Date of cessation of the resident/truncated enterprise group
EKONOMSKE/ STRATIFIKACIJSKE ZNAČILNOSTI
ECONOMIC/ STRATIFICATION CHARACTERISTICS
Šifra glavne dejavnosti rezidenčne/okrnjene skupine na 2-mestni ravni NACE
Principal activity code of the resident/truncated group at NACE 2-digit level
Neobvezno: stranske dejavnosti rezidenčne/okrnjene skupine na 2-mestni ravni NACE
Optional : Secondary activities of the resident/truncated group at NACE 2-digit level
Stranske dejavnosti rezidenčne/okrnjene skupine na 2-mestni ravni NACE
Secondary activities of the resident/truncated group at NACE 2-digit level
Število oseb, ki delajo v rezidenčni/okrnjeni skupini
Number of persons employed in the resident/truncated group
Neobvezno: konsolidirani prihodki od prodaje
Optional : Consolidated turnover
konsolidirani prihodki od prodaje
Consolidated turnover
Identifikacijska številka globalne skupine
Identity number of the global group
Ime globalne skupine
Name of the global group
Neobvezno: država registracije, poštni, elektronski naslov, naslov spletne strani globalnega sedeža
Optional : Country of registration, postal, electronic mail and web site addresses of the global head office
država registracije, poštni, elektronski naslov, naslov spletne strani globalnega sedeža
Country of registration, postal, electronic mail and web site addresses of the global head office
Identifikacijska številka vodje globalne skupine, če je vodja skupine rezidenčni (ustreza identifikacijski številki pravne enote, ki je vodja skupine).
Identity number of the global group head, if the group head is resident (equals the identity number of the legal unit, which is the group head).
Če je vodja globalne skupine nerezidenčni, njegova država registracije in
If the global group head is non-resident, its country of registration, and
neobvezno: njegova identifikacijska številka ali ime in naslov.
optionally: its identity number or name and address.
Če je vodja globalne skupine nerezidenčni, njegova država registracije .
If the global group head is non-resident, its country of registration.
Identifikacijska številka ali ime vodje globalne skupine, če ni rezident
Global group head identity number or name and address, if non-resident
Neobvezno: globalno število oseb, ki delajo
Optional : Number of persons employed globally
Globalno število oseb, ki delajo
Number of persons employed globally
Neobvezno: konsolidirani globalni prihodki od prodaje
Optional : Consolidated global turnover
Konsolidirani globalni prihodki od prodaje
Consolidated global turnover
Neobvezno: država globalnega središča odločanja
Optional : Country of global decision-centre
Država globalnega središča odločanja
Country of global decision-centre
Neobvezno: države, kjer so podjetja ali lokalne enote
Optional : Countries where enterprises or local units are located
Države, kjer so podjetja ali lokalne enote
Countries where enterprises or local units are located
Da bi lahko oblikovalci politike EU delali zanesljive primerjave z drugimi gospodarskimi bloki in tako izbirali pravilne odločitve glede gospodarske politike, je nujno potrebno, da imajo dostop do zanesljive in popolne statistične slike gospodarstva EU.
If EU policy-makers are to make reliable comparisons with other economic blocs for the purposes of choosing the right economic policy decisions, it is indispensable that they have access to a solid and complete statistical picture of the EU's economy.
To je še bolj pomembno v trenutnem okviru globalizacije.
This is all the more important in the current context of globalisation.
Del te statistične slike so t.i. poslovni registri (PR), ki združujejo statistike o gospodarstvu, ki deluje v EU; predvsem podatke o številu organizacij, tipu, velikosti, strukturi in ostale značilnosti.
A part of this statistical picture is the so-called Business Registers (BR), which compiles statistics on businesses operating in EU, namely data on their number, type, size, structure and other characteristics.
Te statistike morajo biti kar precej enovite.
These statistics need to be relatively homogeneous.
Bolj kot so te vrste statistik zanesljive in točne, trdnejše temelje bodo imele odločitve oblikovalcev politike.
The more reliable and accurate these type of statistics are, the more concrete a foundation will policy-makers' decisions have.
To je povezano tudi s splošno potrebo po tem, da se zagotovi večja preglednost in odprtost znotraj EU, takrat ko je to potrebno, saj brez preglednosti ni demokracije.
Moreover, this ties into the general need for more transparency and openness in the EU, at a time when it is lacking: there can be no democracy without transparency.
Stara uredba o poslovnih registrih je v veljavi od leta 1993.
An old BR regulation has been in place since 1993.
Evropska komisija je sedaj predlagala nov predlog, s katerim bi posodobila obstoječe poslovne registre.
The European Commission has now presented a proposal to update the existing BR.
Glavni razlogi za to so:
The main reasons for doing so are:
- povečati področje uporabe: vključitev nekaterih pomembnih sektorjev, kot sta kmetijstvo in javna uprava, je bila v starih poslovnih registrih neobvezna.
- To enlarge the scope: the inclusion of some important sectors in the old BR regulation was optional, namely Agriculture and Public Administrations.
To neskladje ni dovoljevalo, da bi videli celovito sliko gospodarstva, cilj novega predloga pa je odpravljanje te težave s povečevanjem področja uporabe te uredbe.
This distortion did not allow for a comprehensive picture of the economy and the new proposal aims to fix this problem by enlarging the scope of the regulation;
- vključiti podatke o skupinah: stara uredba o poslovnih registrih ni vključevala podatkov o medsebojnih razmerjih in povezavah med večnacionalnimi skupinami podjetij, ki delujejo v EU (podatki o lastniških strukturah, podružnicah itd.).
- To include data on groups: the old BR regulation did not include information on interrelations and links between multinational enterprise groups operating in the EU (data on ownership structures, subsidiaries, etc.).
Nov predlog vključuje vrsto informacij o strukturah skupine (tako znotraj vsake države članice kot izven njihovih meja), saj si drugače ni mogoče ustvariti zanesljive slike o gospodarstvu.
The new proposal includes this type of information on group structures (both inside each Member State as well as cross-border) as otherwise it is not possible to have a reliable picture of the economy.
Poročevalec podpira namen tega predloga in je predstavil vrsto predlogov sprememb s katerimi bi rešili nekatere težave.
The rapporteur supports the thrust of this proposal and has presented a series of amendments in order to solve a few problematic issues.
Najprej imamo vprašanje upravnega bremena.
First, there is the issue of the administrative burden.
Po temeljiti preučitvi postane jasno, da trenutni predlog ne predstavlja nobenih dodatnih stroškov za zasebna podjetja, saj stroške zbiranja in analiziranja podatkov krijejo nacionalni statistični instituti vsake države članice.
After thorough checking, it is clear that the current proposal does not imply any additional costs for private businesses, given that the cost of collecting and analyzing the data is done by the National Statistical Institutes (NSI) of each Member State.
Podjetja bodo morala še naprej zgolj odgovarjati na vprašalnike, tako kot doslej.
Companies will just have to continue replying to surveys as they have done up to now.
Bolj obširna, kot bo uredba o poslovnih registrih, manj neposrednih anket bodo morala podjetja v prihodnosti izpolnjevati.
The more comprehensive the BR regulation is, the less need there will be in the future for direct surveys with companies.
Kljub temu pa drži, da bodo na začetku nastali dodatni stroški, ki jih bodo morali med prilagoditvenim procesom za bolj podrobne poslovne registre kriti nacionalni statistični uradi.
Nevertheless, it is true that initially there will be additional costs to be borne by the NSI's during their adaptation phase to a more comprehensive BR.
Da bi odpravili skrbi nacionalnih statističnih uradov nekaterih držav članic in da bi dovolili prehodno obdobje, ki omogoča prilagoditev sistemov za vključitev zahtevnih in obsežnih kmetijskih podatkov, poročevalcev predlaga, da se začetno prehodno obdobje, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, podaljša.
In order to cater for the concerns of the NSI's of some Member States, and to allow for a transitional period that permits them to adapt their systems for the inclusion of difficult and massive agricultural data, the rapporteur proposes to extend the initial transitional periods originally presented by the Commission.
Druga ključna sprememba zadeva razjasnitev pogojev, pod katerimi se lahko prenašajo zaupni podatki.
The second key modification concerns the clarification of the terms and conditions under which confidential data can be transmitted.
Jasno mora biti, da je prenos zaupnih dokumentov med nacionalnimi statističnimi uradi dovoljen izključno v statistične namene in da je potrebno v vsakem primeru spoštovati nacionalno zakonodajo.
It must be made clear that transmission of confidential documents amongst NSI's must exclusively be for statistical purposes, and that it must in any case respect national law.
Tudi nacionalne centralne banke bi morale biti udeležene pri teh izmenjavah.
In addition, National Central Banks (NCB's) should also be party to these exchanges.
Zato je bilo s tem v zvezi vloženih tudi več predlogov sprememb.
That is why a series of amendments have been tabled in this regard.
Vloženih je bilo tudi več tehničnih predlogov sprememb, zlasti za pojasnitev dejstva, da se več opredelitev in pojasnil pusti za postopek komitologije.
Finally, a series of other technical amendments have been tabled, notably to clarify that several definitions and clarifications are to be left to comitology provisions.
Poročevalec meni, da je ta predlog tehnične narave in ne bi smel biti predmet politične presoje, ki s tem ni povezana.
In all, the rapporteur believes this proposal is of a technical nature and should not be subject to unrelated political considerations.
Evropski parlament bi moral nadaljevati s hitrim sprejetjem, da bi tako dosegli naš cilj, ki je izboljšanje kakovosti in primerljivosti evropske poslovne statistike.
The European Parliament should proceed with a swift adoption in order to achieve our goal which is to improve the quality and comparability of European business statistics.
V okviru globalizacije potrebuje EU trdno statistiko, da bo natančno poznala svoj položaj v primerjavi s tekmeci, kot sta ZDA in Kitajska.
In the context of globalisation, the EU needs robust statistics to know exactly where it stands vis-à-vis its competitors such as the US and China.
Zato je pomembno, da se hitro posodobi stara uredba o poslovnih registrih, ki ne vključuje pomembnih sektorjev gospodarstva (kmetijstvo, javna uprava) in povezav med skupinami in konglomerati.
It is therefore important to quickly update the old BR regulation which did not include important sectors of the economy (Agriculture, Public Administrations) nor links between groups and conglomerates.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi skupnega okvira za poslovne registre v statistične namene in o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2186/93
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common framework for business registers for statistical purposes and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 2186/93
o odločitvah Odbora za peticije v parlamentarnem letu marec 2004 – december 2005
on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the parliamentary year March 2004 - December 2005
PE 370.312v02-00
PE 370.312v03-00
PRILOGA I - LETNO ŠTEVILO PREJETIH PETICIJ V EVROPSKEM PARLAMENTU......18
ANNEX I - ANNUAL NUMBER OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 20
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o odločitvah Odbora za peticije,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions,
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma iz aprila 1989 o okrepitvi pravice do peticije
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of April 1989 on strengthening the right of petition
UL C 120, 12.4.1989, str.
OJ C 120, 12.4.1989, p.90. ,
– ob upoštevanju členov 45 in 192(6) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 45 and 192(6) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0178/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6‑0178/2006 ),
A. ker je pravica do peticije temeljna pravica, ki je neločljivo povezana z državljanstvom Evropske unije,
A. whereas the right to petition is a fundamental right inextricably linked with citizenship of the European Union,
B. ker je pravica do peticije od leta 1992 zapisana v Pogodbi ES in jo potrjujeta člen 44 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije in člen 191 poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta,
B. whereas the right to petition has been enshrined in the EC Treaty since 1992 and is confirmed in the Article 44 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Rule 191 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament,
C. ker so Parlament, Svet in Komisija uradno potrdili to pravico in zagotovili njeno spoštovanje v vseh institucijah,
C. whereas the Parliament, the Council and the Commission formally have confirmed the right to petition and have provided a guarantee regarding inter-institutional follow-up on petitions,
D. ker je izvajanje te pravice pomembno zlasti za državljane, vendar tudi za evropske institucije, saj jim omogoča neposreden vir informacij o vprašanjih in težavah, s katerimi se pri uporabi zakonodaje EU srečujejo državljani,
D. whereas the exercise of this right is important for European citizens in particular, but also for the European institutions, because it allows them to benefit from a direct source of information regarding the concerns and difficulties encountered by ordinary citizens following application of the EU legislation,
E. ker so peticije sredstvo, s katerim lahko Parlament izboljša politični nadzor nad delom EU ter nad prenosom in izvajanjem politik EU s strani evropskih, nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti,
E. whereas the Parliament regards petitions as a means by which it may improve its political oversight and control over the actions of the EU and the way in which the EU's policies are transposed and implemented by EU, national, regional and local authorities,
F. ker so po širitvi Evropske unije maja 2004 državljani desetih novih držav članic pridobili pravico do naslavljanja peticij na Evropski parlament v svojem jeziku in je bil potreben velik logistični napor, da se jim zagotovi izvrševanje te pravice,
F. whereas, following enlargement of the EU in May 2004, citizens from ten new Member States acquired the right to petition the Parliament in their national languages and considerable logistical effort has been necessary to provide them with the possibility of benefiting of this right,
G. ker je treba neprestano zagotavljati, da so državljani EU ustrezno obveščeni o svoji legitimni pravici do naslavljanja peticij na Parlament o vprašanjih, ki zadevajo področja delovanja Evropske unije,
G. whereas there is always a need to ensure that EU citizens are properly informed of their legitimate right to petition the Parliament about matters of concern falling within the fields of activity of the European Union,
H. ker je skoraj tretjina peticij, naslovljenih na Parlament, označenih za nesprejemljive, kar je delno posledica nezadostnih informacij o različnih pristojnostih Parlamenta, varuha človekovih pravic in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ter o različnih pravnih sredstvih, ki so na voljo,
H. whereas almost one-third of the petitions received by Parliament are declared inadmissible, partly as a result of insufficient information about the different competences of, respectively, the Parliament, the European Ombudsman, the European Court of Human rights, and the various national means of redress available,
I. ker je Parlament izboljšal postopek obravnave peticij, da bi bil ta učinkovitejši in preglednejši, vendar ugotavlja, da bi se lahko izboljšalo vključevanje in poenotenje upravnih struktur, pristojnih za peticije, in še zlasti nadaljnje zagotavljanje uravnoteženo in pravično obravnavanje vlagateljev peticij, kot tudi zagotavljanje zaupnosti v postopku, kadar vlagatelji peticij to zahtevajo,
I. whereas the Parliament has improved the procedure for examining petitions in order to be able to deal with petitions more effectively and transparently, but considers that more could be done to integrate and consolidate administrative structures with the responsibility for the petitions process, in particular to further ensure a balanced and just treatment of petitioners, as well as to ensure the confidentiality of the process when requested by petitioners,
J. ker sodelovanje med Parlamentom, varuhom človekovih pravic in Komisijo ostaja pogoj, ko gre za obravnavo vprašanj, ki jih s peticijami in pritožbami sprožijo državljani, in ker bi s poenostavljanjem postopkov med temi tremi organi ti postali še učinkovitejši, zlasti z združevanjem obravnav peticij in pritožb, ki so vložene o isti zadevi,
J. whereas cooperation between the Parliament, the Ombudsman and the Commission remains a prerequisite when addressing the matters raised by the citizens in their petitions and their complaints and some streamlining of procedures between the three bodies, such as combining investigations within the petition procedure when complaints and petitions are tabled on the same subject, might bring about greater efficiency,
K. ker ima po členu 230 Pogodbe ES Parlament pravico, da se obrne na Sodišče evropskih skupnosti pod enakimi pogoji kot Svet in Komisija, in ima zato na voljo tako pravna kot politična sredstva za učinkovitejši odgovor na legitimna vprašanja državljanov;
K. whereas, under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, the Parliament has the right to bring actions before the Court of Justice of the European Communities under the same conditions as the Council and the Commission, and thus has at its disposal both the legal and the political instruments to respond more effectively to citizens' legitimate concerns,
L. ker je Parlament kljub vsemu vedno spodbujal lojalno sodelovanje, predvsem s Komisijo kot varuhom pogodb, kot učinkovito sredstvo za odpravo težav, zaradi katerih se državljani na Parlament obračajo za pomoč,
L. whereas the Parliament, nevertheless, has constantly promoted loyal co-operation, notably with the Commission, as the guardian of the Treaties, as an effective means to remedy problems that have led citizens to seek its assistance,
N. ker morajo države članice in Svet državljanom EU posebej zagotoviti, da se evropska zakonodaja spoštuje in da jo nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne oblasti, kot tudi njim podrejene institucije, ustrezno izvajajo,
N. whereas the Member States and the Council have a particular duty to guarantee, to EU citizens, that European legislation is observed and properly applied by national, regional and local administrations, including by the agencies acting under their authority,
1. potrjuje ključno vlogo Odbora za peticije pri vzpostavitvi stika z državljani EU in krepitvi demokratične legitimnosti in odgovornosti pri postopkih odločanja v EU v očeh evropske javnosti;
Reaffirms the vital role of its Committee on Petitions in reconnecting with the citizens of the EU, and in reinforcing the democratic legitimacy and accountability of the EU decision-making process in the eyes of European public opinion;
5. poudarja pomembno vlogo Komisije pri zagotavljanju predhodnih analiz peticij, kar odboru pomaga pri iskanju ustrezne rešitve za bojazni in težave, s katerimi se v vsakodnevnem življenju srečujejo državljani;
Underlines the significant role played by the Commission in providing preliminary analyses of petitions which helps the Committee to find appropriate solutions to the concerns and problems with which citizens are confronted during their everyday lives;
8. meni, da bi Komisija morala sporočati odločitve o uvedbi postopkov o ugotavljanju kršitev pred vročitvijo formalnega opomina, predvsem ko je bila na Parlament vložena peticija v zvezi s tem vprašanjem;
Considers that the Commission should notify decisions on opening infringement proceedings before the service of a letter of formal notice, in particular when Parliament has been petitioned on the issue in question;
12. meni, da bi morali pristojni parlamentarni odbori nadalje proučiti te nesprejemljive razmere in pripraviti priporočila o jasnejši vključenosti Parlamenta v postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev in o učinkovitejših pravnih sredstvih, ki so na voljo državljanom;
Believes that this unacceptable situation should be further investigated by the competent committees of the Parliament with a view to recommendations being made about more distinct parliamentary involvement in infringement proceedings and a, more effective means of redress for citizens;
14. opozarja na ključno vlogo, ki jo imajo države članice pri pravilnem izvrševanju zakonodaje ES in pri povečevanju pomena, ki ga EU ima pri državljanih; poudarja potrebo po bolj usklajenem sodelovanju predstavnikov držav članic in njihovih parlamentov v razpravah Odbora za peticije;
Recalls the key role that Member States play in correctly implementing the EC legislation and in making the EU more relevant to citizens; stresses the need for a better coordinated participation of the representatives of the Member States and their parliaments in the debates of the Committee on Petitions;
19. ugotavlja, da se v prvem letu po širitvi EU na 25 držav članic število prejetih peticij ni bistveno spremenilo, kar je v nasprotju s prvotnimi pričakovanji; vendar je neizbežno, da bodo državljani novih držav članic čedalje bolj uporabljali svojo pravico do peticije, ko bodo seznanjeni s postopkom vlaganja peticij;
Notes that during the first year since the enlargement of the EU to 25 Member States, the number of petitions received by the Parliament has remained relatively constant, contrary to initial expectations; however, it is inevitable that the closer the citizens of the new Member States become acquainted with the petition process, the more frequently they will make use of this right;
22. poziva konferenco predsednikov, naj ob primernem času razmisli o znatnem povečanju članstva Odbora za peticije na 50 članov, da se zagotovi, da so evropski državljani v odboru deležni boljšega razumevanja svojega primera in da se torej omogoči Parlamentu, da se boljše odzove na pričakovanja vlagateljev peticij;
Calls upon the Conference of Presidents to consider, at the appropriate time, a substantial increase of the membership of the Committee of Petitions to 50 full members in order to ensure that European citizens are able to obtain an even better understanding of their case in Committee, and thus allow the Parliament to better respond to the expectations of petitioners;