natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Še posebno je treba upoštevati imunotoksičnost, endokrine motnje, reproduktivne toksičnosti in učinke majhnih odmerkov.
Immunotoxicity, endocrine disruption, developmental toxicity and low-dose effects are among those that should be considered in particular.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 13, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 13 carried at first reading.
Evropska agencija za varno hrano ima pomembno vlogo pri oceni tveganja, zato jo je treba podpreti in ji zagotoviti potrebna sredstva.
The importance of the European Food Safety Authority's role in assessing risk should be supported by it having the necessary resources it needs.
Uvodna izjava 30 a (novo)
RECITAL 30 A (new)
(30a) Da se zagotovi primerna obveščenost potrošnikov, države članice vsake tri mesece na svetovnem spletu objavijo rezultate nacionalnega spremljanja ostankov z vsemi posameznimi podatki, vključno s krajem zbiranja podatkov in imeni trgovcev na drobno, trgovcev na debelo in/ali proizvajalcev.
(30a) To ensure that consumers are kept adequately informed, Member States should publish the results of national monitoring of residues every three months on the internet, providing all individual data, including the place of collection and the names of retailers, traders and/or producers.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 59, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 59 carried at first reading.
Preglednost je za potrošnike pomembna.
Transparency for consumers is important.
Treba jim je omogočiti, da se lahko premišljeno odločijo za proizvod, tudi na osnovi prisotnosti ostankov in upoštevanja uredbe.
They should be given the possibility to make a reasoned choice for a product, also based on the presence of residues and the compliance with the Regulation.
Četrtletno objavljanje vrednosti ostankov se v praksi že izvaja v Združenem kraljestvu.
This quarterly publication of residues is already being practised in the UK.
Člen 1
ARTICLE 1
Vsebina in cilj
Subject matter and aim
Ta uredba ureja v skladu s splošnimi načeli Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 usklajene določbe Skupnosti, ki se nanašajo na mejne vrednosti ostankov pesticidov v hrani in krmi rastlinskega in živalskega izvora.
This Regulation establishes, in accordance with the general principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, harmonized Community provisions relating to maximum levels of pesticide residues in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin.
Cilj te uredbe je vzpostavitev uravnoteženih mejnih vrednosti ostankov (MVO) pesticidov v proizvodih rastlinskega in živalskega izvora in tako zaščititi vse evropske potrošnike pred možnimi vplivi na zdravje.
The aim of this Regulation is to set harmonised maximum residue levels (MRLs) for pesticides in products of plant and animal origin in order to protect all European consumers against possible health effects.
MVO bi zato morale biti postavljene na najnižji razumsko doseženi stopnji, da bi tako zagotavljale najboljšo mogočo zaščito potrošnikov.
MRLs should therefore be set at the lowest reasonably achievable level with the aim of ensuring the best possible consumer protection.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 16, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of Amendment 16 adopted at 1 st reading.
Poudarek mora biti tudi na zaščiti javnega zdravja, ne pa samo na jamstvu za prosti pretok proizvodov.
Emphasis needs to be placed on protecting public health, not only on guaranteeing the free movement of products.
Člen 3, odstavek 2, točka (a)
ARTICLE 3, PARAGRAPH 2, POINT (A)
(a) „dobra kmetijska praksa“ (DKP): pomeni nacionalno priporočeno, odobreno ali registrirano varno uporabo fitofarmacevtskih sredstev pod dejanskimi pogoji v vsaki fazi pridelave, skladiščenja, prevoza, distribucije in predelave hrane in krme;
(a) "good agricultural practice" (GAP): means the nationally recommended, authorised or registered safe use of plant protection products under actual conditions at any stage of production, storage, transport, distribution and processing of food and feed;
(a) „dobra kmetijska praksa“ (DKP): pomeni nacionalno priporočeno, odobreno ali registrirano varno uporabo fitofarmacevtskih sredstev pod dejanskimi pogoji v vsaki fazi pridelave, skladiščenja, prevoza, distribucije in predelave hrane in krme.
(a) "good agricultural practice" (GAP): means the nationally recommended, authorised or registered safe use of plant protection products under actual conditions at any stage of production, storage, transport, distribution and processing of food and feed.
Prav tako pa pomeni uporabo načel integriranega zatiranja škodljivih organizmov, pa tudi uporabo najmanjše možne količine pesticidov ter postavitev MVO/začasnih MVO na najnižjo stopnjo, kar omogoča želene učinke;
It also implies the application of the principles of integrated pest control in a given climate zone, as well as using the minimum quantity of pesticides and setting MRLs/temporary MRLs at the lowest level which allows the desired effect to be obtained;
Kot je bilo utemeljeno v prvi obravnavi, je integrirano zatiranje škodljivih organizmov del opredelitev dobre kmetijske prakse, kot je utemeljena v Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
As stated in the first reading, integrated pest control is part of the definition of good agricultural practice as stated in 91/414/EEC.
Člen 3, odstavek 2, točka (d)
ARTICLE 3, PARAGRAPH 2, POINT (D)
(d) „Mejna vrednost ostankov“ (MVO): pomeni zgornjo zakonsko mejo koncentracije ostankov pesticida v hrani ali krmi;
(d) "Maximum Residue Level" (MRL): means the upper legal level of concentration for a pesticide residue in or on food or feed;
(d) „Mejna vrednost ostankov“ (MVO): pomeni zgornjo zakonsko mejo koncentracije ostankov pesticida v hrani ali krmi, ki temelji na najboljših možnih kmetijskih metodah zaščite pridelka, tj. integriranemu varstvu rastlin pred škodljivci v danem podnebnem območju in najnižji izpostavljenosti potrošnika, ki je nujna za zaščito ranljivih potrošnikov;
(d) "Maximum Residue Level" (MRL): means the upper legal level of concentration for a pesticide residue in or on food or feed based on the best available agricultural methods of crop protection, i.e. integrated pest control in a given climate zone, and the lowest consumer exposure necessary to protect all vulnerable consumers;
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 21, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Retabled amendment 21 from first reading.
Člen 3, odstavek 2, točka (g)
ARTICLE 3, PARAGRAPH 2, POINT G
(g) "toleranca pri uvozu" pomeni najvišjo dovoljeno vrednost ostankov za uvožene proizvode, kadar:
(g) "import tolerance": means an MRL set for imported products where:
– uporaba aktivne snovi v fitofarmacevtskem sredstvu na določenem proizvodu v Skupnosti ni dovoljena ali
– the use of the active substance in a plant protection product on a given product is not authorised in the Community; or
– uporaba aktivne snovi v fitofarmacevtskem sredstvu na določenem proizvodu v Skupnosti ni dovoljena zaradi drugih razlogov razen javnega zdravja za specifičen proizvod in specifično uporabo ali
– the use of the active substance in a plant protection product on a given product is not authorised in the Community for reasons other than public health reasons for the specific product and specific use; or
– veljavna mejna vrednost ostankov ne zadošča zahtevam mednarodne trgovine;
– an existing Community MRL is not sufficient to meet the needs of international trade;
– je primerna druga vrednost, ker je bila veljavna mejna vrednost ostankov določena zaradi drugih razlogov razen javnega zdravja za specifičen proizvod in specifično uporabo;
– a different level is appropriate because the existing Community MRL was set for reasons other than public health reasons for the specific product and specific use;
Parlament je v svojem izvirnem poročilu besedilo prilagodil tako, da je upošteval pomisleke o prevladovanju mednarodne trgovine nad javnim zdravjem.
The Parliament's original text adapted the text to ensure that concerns over international trade overriding public health were addressed.
Svet se je vrnil k izvirnemu besedilu.
The Council has reverted back to the original text.
Zgornja sprememba se predlaga kot kompromis.
This is suggested as a compromise.
Člen 3, odstavek 2, točka (i)
ARTICLE 3, PARAGRAPH 2, POINT (I)
(i) „akutni referenčni odmerek“: pomeni oceno količine snovi v hrani, izraženo na osnovi telesne teže, ki jo je moč zaužiti v kratkem času, običajno med enim obrokom ali v enem dnevu, brez znatnega tveganja za zdravje potrošnika na osnovi vseh znanih dejstev v času vrednotenja;
(i) "acute reference dose": means the estimate of the amount of substance in food, expressed on a body weight basis, that can be ingested over a short period of time, usually during one meal or one day, without appreciable health risk to the consumer on the basis of all known facts at the time of evaluation ;
(i) „akutni referenčni odmerek“: pomeni oceno količine snovi v hrani, izraženo na osnovi telesne teže, ki jo je moč zaužiti v kratkem času, običajno med enim obrokom ali v enem dnevu, brez znatnega tveganja za zdravje potrošnika na osnovi podatkov iz ustreznih študij in ob upoštevanju kumulativnih in sinergijskih učinkov različnih fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, pa tudi večje ranljivosti otrok in nerojenih otrok;
(i) "acute reference dose": means the estimate of the amount of substance in food, expressed on a body weight basis, that can be ingested over a short period of time, usually during one meal or one day, without appreciable health risk to the consumer on the basis of the data produced by appropriate studies, and taking into account the known cumulative and synergistic effects of the different plant protection products, as well as the higher vulnerability of children and the unborn ;
Člen 3, odstavek 2, točka (j)
ARTICLE 3, PARAGRAPH 2, POINT (J)
(j) "dopustni dnevni vnos": pomeni oceno količine snovi v hrani, izraženo na osnovi telesne teže, ki jo je moč zaužiti vsakodnevno, brez znatnega tveganja za zdravje potrošnika na osnovi vseh znanih dejstev v času vrednotenja.
(j) "acceptable daily intake": means the estimate of the amount of substance in food expressed on a body weight basis, that can be ingested daily over a lifetime, without appreciable health risk to the consumer on the basis of all known facts at the time of evaluation.
(j) "dopustni dnevni vnos": pomeni oceno količine snovi v hrani, izraženo na osnovi telesne teže, ki jo je moč zaužiti vsakodnevno, brez znatnega tveganja za zdravje vseh potrošnikov na osnovi vseh znanih dejstev v času vrednotenja, vključno s kumulativnimi in sinergijskimi učinki različnih fitofarmacevtskih sredstev ter ob upoštevanju večje ranljivosti otrok in nerojenih otrok.
(j) "acceptable daily intake: means the estimate of the amount of substance in food , expressed on a body weight basis, that can be ingested daily over a lifetime, without appreciable risk to any consumer on the basis of all known facts at the time of evaluation , including known cumulative and synergistic effects of the different plant protection products, and taking into account the higher vulnerability of children and the unborn .
Člen 6, odstavek 2
ARTICLE 6, PARAGRAPH 2
Stranke, za katere je ustrezno razvidno , da predstavljajo zakonit interes, vključno s proizvajalci in pridelovalci proizvodov, ki so vključeni v Prilogi I, lahko v skladu s členom 7 prav tako oddajo prošnjo državi članici.
Parties demonstrating, through adequate evidence, a legitimate interest, including manufacturers, growers and producers of products covered by Annex I may also submit an application to a Member State in accordance with Article 7.
Vse stranke, ki imajo zakonit interes za zdravje in okolje, vključno s civilno-družbenimi organizacijami, pa tudi komercialno zainteresirane stranke, kot so proizvajalci, pridelovalci in uvozniki proizvodov, ki so vključeni v Prilogi I, lahko v skladu s členom 7 prav tako oddajo prošnjo državi članici.
All parties with a legitimate interest in health and environment , including civil society organisations as well as commercially interested parties such as manufacturers, growers , importers and producers of products covered by Annex I may also submit an application to a Member State in accordance with Article 7.
Člen 7, odstavek 1, točka (c)
ARTICLE 7, PARAGRAPH 1, POINT (C)
(c) kjer je to primerno, znanstveno utemeljeni razlogi za pomisleke;
(c) where appropriate, scientifically substantiated reasons for concern;
(c) popoln pregled zadev v znanstveni literaturi, pa tudi pregled specializiranih, javno dostopnih publikacij zadnjih deset let o proizvodih za zaščito rastlin in/ali o njihovih ostankih;
(c) a complete overview of any concern raised in the scientific literature as well as an overview of the last ten years of scientific peer-reviewed literature about the plant protection product and/or its residue;
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 33, sprejet v prvi obravnavi, nekoliko spremenjen, da upošteva pomisleke Sveta o pristojnostih agencije EFSA.
Reinstatement of amendment 33 adopted at first reading, slightly modified in order to take into account Council’s concerns about the capacities of EFSA..
Če gre za pomislek v zvezi s proizvodom za zaščito rastlin in/ali o njegovih ostankih v znanstveni literaturi, mora vlagatelj za mejne vrednosti ostankov pripraviti popoln pregled vseh pomislekov.
If a concern is present for the plant protection product and/or its residue in the scientific literature the applicant for an MRL has to make a complete overview of the concerns raised.
Ustrezno znanstveno literaturo za proizvod mora priskrbeti vlagatelj in ne agencija EFSA.
It should be the task of the applicant, not of EFSA, to provide the relevant scientific literature on the product.
Če vlagatelj ne priskrbi literature, se lahko prošnja zavrne.
If the applicant fails to do so, this should be a reason for a denial of the application.
Člen 7, odstavek 2
ARTICLE 7, PARAGRAPH 2
Država članica, ki izvaja presojo, lahko, če je potrebno, od vlagatelja zahteva posredovanje dodatnih podatkov poleg podatkov iz odstavka 1 v roku, ki ga določi sama.
The evaluating Member State may, where appropriate, request the applicant to provide supplementary information in addition to information required under paragraph 1 within a time limit specified by the Member State.
Ta rok ne sme biti daljši od dveh let.
In no event may this period exceed two years.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 34, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 34 carried at first reading.
Rok, ki ga določi posamezna država članica, bi lahko povzročil nejasnosti in neenake standarde.
A time limit specified by the Member State will lead to too much confusion and uneven standards.
Predlagani rok daje proizvajalcem na voljo dovolj časa, da zberejo podatke, hkrati pa zaščiti javnost v primerih, ko je pristojni organ mnenja, da obstaja nevarnost za to.
This time period allows producers enough time to acquire data, but protects the public in cases where the relevant authority sees a significant danger.
Člen 11, odstavek 2 a (novo)
ARTICLE 11, PARAGRAPH 2 A (new)
Ustrezno znanstveno literaturo za proizvod mora priskrbeti vlagatelj in ne agencija EFSA.
A time limit of three months has been accepted by the EFSA.
Če vlagatelj ne priskrbi literature, se lahko prošnja zavrne.
However, when dealing with accession countries’ applications the scientific research available on certain pesticides may not be enough for the EFSA to make a justified decision in the time span of three months.
Člen 13, odstavek 1
ARTICLE 13, PARAGRAPH 1
Vsako odločitev ali opustitev organa v okviru pristojnosti, ki so mu bile podeljene s to uredbo, lahko preveri Komisija na lastno pobudo ali na prošnjo države članice ali vsakega posameznika, ki ga odločitev ali opustitev neposredno zadeva.
Any decision taken under, or failure to exercise, the powers vested in the Authority by this Regulation may be reviewed by the Commission on its own initiative or in response to a request from a Member State or from any person directly and individually concerned.
Vsako odločitev ali opustitev organa v okviru pristojnosti, ki so mu bile podeljene s to uredbo, lahko preveri Komisija na prošnjo države članice ali vsakega posameznika, ki ga odločitev ali opustitev neposredno zadeva.
Any decision taken under, or failure to exercise, the powers vested in the Authority by this Regulation may be reviewed by the Commission in response to a request from a Member State or from any person directly and individually concerned.
Člen 14, odstavek 2, točka (b)
ARTICLE 14, PARAGRAPH 2, POINT (B)
(b) morebitna prisotnost ostankov pesticidov iz drugih virov razen registriranih načinov uporab aktivnih snovi v fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih;
(b) the possible presence of pesticide residues arising from sources other than current plant protection uses of active substances;
(b) morebitna prisotnost ostankov pesticidov iz drugih virov razen registriranih načinov uporab aktivnih snovi v fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih in njihovi znani kumulativni in sinergistični učinki;
(b) the possible presence of pesticide residues arising from sources other than current plant protection uses of active substances , and their known cumulative and synergistic effects ;
Ponovna navedba predloga 43 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of amendment 43 carried at first reading.
Kadar so kumulativni in sinergistični učinki znanstveno dokazani, jih je treba upoštevati.
Where scientifically proven cumulative and synergistic effects are established, these should be taken into account.
Člen 14, odstavek 2, točka (c)
ARTICLE 14, PARAGRAPH 2, POINT (C)
(c) rezultati presoje morebitnih tveganj za potrošnika in, kjer je to primerno, za živali;
(c) the results of an assessment of any potential risks to the consumer and, where appropriate, to animals;
(c) rezultati presoje morebitnih tveganj za potrošnike, ki zaužijejo največ (vključno z izpostavljenostjo še drugim virom poleg hrane) in ki so najbolj ogroženi, ter, kjer je to primerno, za živali;
(c) the results of an assessment of any potential risks to consumers with the highest intake (including exposure to sources other than food) and highest vulnerability and, where appropriate, to animals;
Člen 16, odstavek 1, točka (b)
ARTICLE 16, PARAGRAPH 1, POINT (B)
(b) kadar zadevni proizvodi predstavljajo manjši del prehrane potrošnikov in, kjer je to primerno, živali ali
(b) where the products concerned constitute a minor component of the diet of consumers and, where relevant, of animals; or
(b) kadar zadevni proizvodi predstavljajo manjši del prehrane potrošnikov in ne predstavljajo pomembnejšega dela prehrane nobene od podskupin in, kjer je to primerno, živali ali
(b) where the products concerned constitute a minor component of the diet of consumers , and do not constitute a major part of the diet of any subgroups, and, where relevant, of animals; or
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 50, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 50 carried at first reading.
Pomembno je zagotoviti varstvo vseh potrošnikov, tudi podskupin, ki uživajo več določenih proizvodov.
It is important to ensure that all consumers have protection, including sub groups which may consume more of particular products.
Člen 16, odstavek 1, točka (c)
ARTICLE 16, PARAGRAPH 1, POINT (C)
c) za med ali
(c) for honey; or
(c) za med in zeliščne poparke, pri katerih se vrednosti ostankov pesticidov določijo za celoten proizvod na podlagi podatkov, pridobljenih s spremljanjem, in upoštevanja obrazloženega mnenja organa v skladu s postopkom iz člena 45(2); ali
(c) for honey and herbal infusions, where pesticide residues can be set for the complete product on the basis of monitoring data and taking into account a reasoned opinion of the Authority in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 45(2) ; or
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 52, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 52 carried at first reading.
Zeliščni poparki lahko vsebujejo tudi do 200 manjših sestavin in za številne od njih je težko zbrati podatke.
Herbal infusions can contain as many as 200 minor ingredients, many of which are difficult to attain data for.
Iz tega razloga so bili v izvirnem poročilu Parlamenta uvrščeni v posebno kategorijo.
This is why in Parliament’s original report they were granted a separate category.
Člen 16, odstavek 1, točka (d a) (novo)
ARTICLE 16, PARAGRAPH 1, POINT (D A) (new)
(da)kadar se novi proizvodi, skupine proizvodov in/ali deli proizvodov na zahtevo ene ali več držav članic vključijo v prilogo I, da se omogočita izvedba in ocena znanstvenih raziskav, potrebnih za podporo MVO, če ni ugotovljeno nesprejemljivo tveganje za varnost potrošnika.
(da) where new products, product groups and/or parts of products have been included in Annex I, and one or more Member States so request, in order to allow any scientific studies necessary for supporting an MRL to be undertaken and evaluated, provided that no unacceptable safety concerns for the consumer have been identified.
Člen 4(2) Skupnega stališča predvideva dodajanje novih proizvodov, ki jih predlog Komisije (člen 17) ni vseboval, v Prilogo I.
Article 4(2) of the Common Position provides for adding new commodities to Annex I, which was not present in the Commission’s proposal (Article 17).
Skupno stališče pa ne predvideva ustreznih prehodnih dogovorov.
The Common Position does not, however, provide adequate transitional arrangements.
Primerno je, da se taki dogovori vključijo v člen 16, ki obravnava okoliščine, v katerih je mogoče določiti začasne mejne vrednosti ostankov.
It is appropriate to include such arrangements in Article 16, dealing with circumstances in which temporary MRLs may be set.
Mejne vrednosti ostankov temeljijo na podatkih specifičnih preizkušanj, ki navadno potekajo v času dveh rastnih sezon in jih nato ovrednoti regulativni organ.
MRLs are based on data from specific trials, which normally take place over two growing seasons and are then evaluated by the regulatory authority.
Ti podatki verjetno niso na voljo za proizvode, za katere prej ni bila zahtevana določitev mejne vrednosti ostankov; pesticidi se smejo namesto tega uporabljati za te pridelke na osnovi splošnejših varnostnih podatkov.
These data are unlikely to be available for products which have not previously required MRLs; instead, pesticides are authorised for use on these crops on the basis of more general safety data.
Če bi bili proizvodi vključeni v Prilogo I, ne da bi bil dovoljen čas za generiranje in ovrednotenje podatkov iz specifičnih preizkusov MVO, bi bile njihove vrednosti MVO nastavljene na privzeto vrednost (na nič).
If products were included in Annex I without allowing time for data from specific MRLs trials to be generated and evaluated, their MRLs would be set to the default value (effectively zero).
Obstoječa dovoljena uporaba pesticidov na proizvodih bi morala biti posledično umaknjena, tudi če bi bili varni za potrošnike.
Consequently, existing authorised uses of pesticides on them would have to be withdrawn, even though they were safe for consumers.
Člen 16, odstavek 2, pododstavek 3
ARTICLE 16, PARAGRAPH 2, SUBPARAGRAPH 3
Mejne vrednosti ostankov, omenjene v odstavku 1(d), se ponovno določijo po preteku obdobja, za katerega je bila dovoljena osnovna uporaba.
The MRLs referred to in paragraph 1(d) shall be re-assessed at the expiry of the period for which the essential use was authorised.
Mejne vrednosti ostankov, omenjene v odstavku 1(da), se ponovno določijo, ko se zaključijo in ovrednotijo znanstvene raziskave, ampak ne pozneje kot štiri leta po tem, ko so bile vključene v Prilogo III.
The MRLs referred to in paragraph 1(da) shall be re-assessed when the scientific studies have been completed and evaluated, but no later than four years after their inclusion in Annex III.
Člen 22, odstavek 2a ( novo)
ARTICLE 22, PARAGRAPH 2 A (new)
MVO se določijo na najnižji stopnji, ki se lahko doseže v vseh državah članicah na osnovi dobre kmetijske prakse in ob upoštevanju načel integriranega varstva rastlin pred škodljivci.
Temporary MRLs shall be set at the lowest level that can be achieved in all Member States on the basis of good agricultural practice and respecting the principles of integrated pest control.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 49, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 49 adopted at first reading.