natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju člena 44 akta Sveta z dne 3. decembra 1998, ki določa kadrovske predpise za osebje Europola (v nadaljevanju "kadrovski predpisi"),
– having regard to Article 44 of the Council Act of 3 December 1998 laying down the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees (hereinafter referred to as the "staff regulations"),
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0072/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0072/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom Demokratični nadzor Europola ( KOM(2002)0095 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication to the European Parliament and the Council - Democratic Control over Europol ( COM(2002)0095 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila Svetu z dne 30. maja 2002 o nadaljnjem razvoju Europola in njegovi samodejni vključitvi v institucionalni sistem Evropske unije
– having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 30 May 2002 on the future development of Europol and its automatic incorporation into the institutional system of the European Union
UL C 187 E, 7.8.2003, str.
OJ C 187 E, 7.8.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila Svetu z dne 10. aprila 2003 o nadaljnjem razvoju Europola
– having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 10 April 2003 on the future development of Europol
UL C 64 E, 12.3.2004, str.
OJ C 64 E, 12.3.2004, p.588. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0278/2006 )
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0278/2006 )
A. ker Parlament ni bil zaprošen za mnenje ali obveščen o kakršnih koli operativnih in organizacijskih ukrepih, povezanih z Europolom, ali o Europolovih sedanjih dejavnostih in prihodnjih programih za odzivanje na potrebe EU in držav članic; ker je ob takem pomanjkanju informacij nemogoče, da bi Parlament ocenil pomen in ustreznost predlaganega sklepa, čeprav je sprememba Europola v agencijo EU nujna za prispevanje k večji preglednosti in boljšemu nadzoru in ker Svet s svojo blokado te spremembe ovira.
A. whereas Parliament has not been consulted on, or informed of, any of the operational and organisational measures concerning Europol, or Europol’s current activities and future programmes in response to the needs of the EU and the Member States; whereas this lack of information makes it impossible for Parliament to assess the relevance and adequacy of the proposed decision, whereas the conversion of Europol into an EU agency is urgently necessary in order to improve transparency and supervision and by blocking progress in this regard, the Council is failing to shoulder its responsibilities;
Evropski parlament je bil zaprošen za mnenje o pobudi za prilagoditev osnovnih plač in dodatkov osebja Europola za obdobje med 1. julijem 2005 in 1. julijem 2006, ki jo je predložila Republika Avstrija.
The European Parliament has been consulted on the initiative presented by the Republic of Austria adjusting the basic salaries and allowances applicable to Europol staff for the period between 1 July 2005 and 1 July 2006.
Namen tega osnutka sklepa, ki temelji na avstrijski pobudi, je prilagoditev osnovnih plač in dodatkov osebja Europola glede na pregled, ki ga je opravil upravni odbor.
This draft Decision on the basis of the Austrian initiative aims at adjusting the basic salaries and allowances of the Europol staff in light of a review carried out by the Management Board.
Upravni odbor je upošteval spremembe življenjskih stroškov na Nizozemskem, pa tudi spremembe plač v javnem sektorju držav članic.
The Board took account of the changes in the cost of living in the Netherlands, as well as of the changes in salaries in the public service in the Member States.
Pregled upravičuje zvišanje prejemkov za 1,6 % za obdobje med 1.7.2005 in 1.7.2006.
That review justifies an increase of 1,6% of remuneration for the period between 01.07.2005 and the 01.07.2006.
Evropski parlament popolnoma razume potrebo Europola, da prilagodi in uskladi plače zaposlenih v skladu s spremembami, ki so povezane z zvišanjem življenjskih stroškov, ter temu v ničemer ne nasprotuje.
The European Parliament understands perfectly the need for the organisation at stake to amend and update the salaries of its staff according to the changes related to the increase in the cost of living and it does not have anything to say against it.
Vendar pa Evropski parlament meni, da je samo po sebi precej izzivalno zaprositi ga za mnenje glede dokumenta, ki ima takšne finančne posledice, kot jih ima pričujoči.
However, the European Parliament believes that its consultation on a document with financial implications such as the present one is quite provocative in character.
Splošno je znano, da je Europol medvladna institucija, ki jo financira vsaka država članica Evropske unije.
It is of common knowledge that Europol is an intergovernmental institution funded by each Member State of the European Union.
Evropski parlament nima nobenega vpliva na proračun Europola in zato nima nobene vloge pri upravnih odločitvah, povezanih z njegovo organizacijo.
The European Parliament does not have any saying on the Europol budget and therefore it does not have any role in administrative decisions related to this organisation.
Posvetovanje o dokumentu, ki ima finančne posledice, medtem ko ni predvideno posvetovanje glede sprejetja proračuna Europola, se zato zdi gola formalnost.
It seems therefore a mere formality to be consulted on a document which has financial impact while no consultation is foreseen as far as the adoption of the Europol budget is concerned.
Poročevalec v nadaljevanju izpostavlja nekatera najbolj pomembna vprašanja, na katera je treba odgovoriti, preden bi Evropski parlament lahko podal kakršno koli mnenje o finančnih zadevah.
Your rapporteur points out, as follows, what are some of the most important issues that have to be addressed before any consultation on financial matters could be provided by the European Parliament.
Nadzor Evropskega parlamenta nad Europolom
The European parliament's scrutiny on Europol
Bistvenega pomena je poudariti, da je posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom o dejavnostih Europola kot medvladnega telesa, potrebno le, če pripomore k izboljšanju preglednosti in odgovornosti tega telesa.
It is crucial to point out that the consultation of the European Parliament on the activities of Europol, an intergovernmental body, is necessary only if it helps to increase the transparency and accountability of this body.
V tem trenutku delo Europola ni niti pod nadzorom Evropskega parlamenta, niti ga sodno ne pregleduje Evropsko sodišče
At the moment there is neither the supervision of the European Parliament nor a judicial review by the European Court of Justice on the work of the Europol
Boj proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu; policijsko sodelovanje v Evropi: vloga Europola; Jens Henrik Højbjerg, namestnik direktorja Europola, prispevek na skupnem parlamentarnem srečanju dne 18. oktobra 2005, str.
Fight against terrorism and organised crime; police cooperation in Europe: the role of Europol, contribution of Mr. Jens Henrik Højbjerg, Europol Deputy Director to the joint parliamentary meeting of 18 October 2005, p.
Četudi je v členu 39 PES določena obveznost Sveta, da se posvetuje s Parlamentom pred sprejetjem pravno obvezujočih ukrepov, kakršni so okvirni sklepi, sklepi in konvencije, to orodje ni dovolj za zagotavljanje demokratičnega nadzora.
Despite that Art. 39 of the TUE lays down an obligation for the Council to consult the Parliament before the adoption of legally binding measures, such as framework decisions, decisions and conventions, this tool is not enough to ensure democratic control.
Poleg tega, „Evropski parlament sodeluje pri določenih odločitvah glede razvoja Europola, npr. pri vseh spremembah konvencije, vendar ne glede določanja prednostnih nalog v dejavnostih Europola“
Furthermore, "the European Parliament participates in certain decisions as regards the development of Europol, e.g. any amendment to the Convention but not about the prioritizing of Europol's activities"
Boj proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu; policijsko sodelovanje v Evropi: vloga Europola; Bruselj, 27. septembra 2005. .
Fight against terrorism and organised crime; police cooperation in Europe: the role of Europol, Brussels 27 September 2005. .
Evropski parlament je ob različnih priložnostih
At various occasions
CNS/2005/0803 Europol: prilagoditev osnovnih plač in dodatkov osebja Europola z julijem 2004.
CNS/2005/0803 Europol: adjusting the basic salaries and allowances applicable to staff as from July 2004.
Pobuda Luksemburga, poročevalec: Claude Moraes
Initiative Luxembourg, rapporteur: Claude Moraes
CNS/2004/0817 Euro: imenovanje Europola za osrednji urad boja proti ponarejanju.
CNS/2004/0817 Euro: designating Europol as the Central Office for combating counterfeiting.
Pobuda Nemčije, Španije, Francije, Italije, Združenega kraljestva, Irske, poročevalec: Díaz de Mera García Consuegra Agustín
Initiative Germany, Spain, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Northern Ireland, rapporteur : Díaz de Mera García Consuegra Agustín
CNS/2004/0806 Europol: prilagoditev osnovnih plač in dodatkov z julijem 2002.
CNS/2004/0806 Europol: adjusting the basic salaries and allowances as from July 2002.
Pobuda Irske, poročevalec: Turco Maurizio
Initiative Ireland, rapporteur: Turco Maurizio
CNS/2002/0822 Europol: kadrovski predpisi, predlogi sprememb.
CNS/2002/0822 Europol: staff regulations, amendments.
Pobuda Danske, poročevalec: Turco Maurizio
Initiative Denmark, rapporteur: Turco Maurizio
CNS/2002/0814 Evropski policijski urad, Europol: protokol h konvenciji, pranje denarja.
CNS/2002/0814 European Police Office, Europol: protocol to the Convention, money laundering.
Pobuda Danske, poročevalec: von Boetticher Christian Ulrik. izjavil, da je zaradi medvladne narave postopkov odločanja na področju policijskega sodelovanja obstoječa ureditev parlamentarnega nadzora preveč zapletena in neučinkovita.
Initiative Denmark, rapporteur: von Boetticher Christian Ulrik. the European Parliament stated that existing parliamentary control arrangements were too cumbersome and, as a result of the intergovernmental nature of decision-making procedures in the police cooperation area, ineffective.
Zlasti glede parlamentarnega nadzora je Parlament že pozval Svet, naj okrepi demokratične pristojnosti nadzora Evropskega parlamenta nad Europolom
In particular, as regards parliamentary control, the Parliament has already asked the Council to strengthen the European Parliament’s democratic power of control over Europol
Te zahteve še niso bile izpolnjene.
These requests have not yet been satisfied.
1.1 Spomniti je treba, da je bila ustava EU, navkljub njeni usodi, jasno usmerjena v izboljšanje položaja, kot je to predstavljeno v členu III-276
1.1 It should be remembered that the EU Constitution, despite its destiny, was clearly aimed at improving the situation as shown in article III-276
Člen III-276 se glasi:
Article III-276 reads:
Naloga Europola je podpirati in krepiti dejavnosti policijskih organov držav članic in drugih služb kazenskega pregona ter njihovo medsebojno sodelovanje pri preprečevanju in boju proti hudim oblikam kriminala, ki vplivajo na dve ali več držav članic, terorizmu in oblikam kriminala, ki vplivajo na skupni interes politike Unije.
Europol’s mission shall be to support and strengthen action by the Member States’ police authorities and other law enforcement services and their mutual cooperation in preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States, terrorism and forms of crime which affect a common interest covered by a Union policy.
Z evropskimi zakoni se določi Europolova struktura, delovanje, področje ukrepanja in naloge.
European laws shall determine Europol’s structure, operation, field of action and tasks.
Te naloge lahko zajemajo:
These tasks may include:
a) zbiranje, hrambo, obdelavo, analizo in izmenjavo informacij, ki so jih posredovali predvsem organi držav članic ali tretjih držav oziroma služb;
(a) the collection, storage, processing, analysis and exchange of information forwarded particularly by the authorities of the Member States or third countries or bodies;
b) usklajevanje, organizacijo in izvajanje preiskovalnih in operativnih dejanj, ki se izvajajo skupaj s pristojnimi organi držav članic ali v okviru skupnih preiskovalnih ekip, po potrebi v povezavi z Eurojustom.
(b) the coordination, organisation and implementation of investigative and operational action carried out jointly with the Member States’ competent authorities or in the context of joint investigative teams, where appropriate in liaison with Eurojust.
S temi zakoni se določijo tudi postopki za oceno Europolovih dejavnosti, ki jo opravi Evropski parlament, skupaj z nacionalnimi parlamenti.
European laws shall also lay down the procedures for scrutiny of Europol’s activities by the European Parliament, together with national Parliaments.
Europol vsa svoja operativna dejanja izvaja v povezavi in v dogovoru z organi držav članic, katerih ozemlje to zadeva.
Any operational action by Europol must be carried out in liaison and in agreement with the authorities of the Member State or States whose territory is concerned.
Uporaba prisilnih ukrepov je v izključni pristojnosti pristojnih nacionalnih organov.“ .
The application of coercive measures shall be the exclusive responsibility of the competent national authorities.’ .
Ustava bi, če bi stopila v veljavo, omogočala Parlamentu, da v soodločanju s Svetom, „določi Europolovo strukturo, delovanje, področje ukrepanja in naloge“, pa tudi, da se „določijo [tudi] postopki za oceno Europolovih dejavnosti, ki jo opravi Evropski parlament, skupaj z nacionalnimi parlamenti.“
If in place, the Constitution would have then made it possible for the Parliament, in co-decision with the Council, to ‘determine Europol’s structure, operation, field of action and tasks’ as well as ‘lay down the procedures for scrutiny of Europol’s activities by the European Parliament, together with national Parliaments.
Vključitev tega člena v osnutek ustave jasno kaže na splošno soglasje držav članic za povečanje preglednosti Europola in na vlogo Evropskega parlamenta pri ocenjevanju njegovih dejavnosti.
The insertion of this article into the draft Constitution clearly shows the general consensus of Member States in increasing the transparency of Europol and the role of the European Parliament in scrutinising its activities.
Europol kot agencija EU
The Europol as an EU Agency
Preoblikovanje Europola v agencijo EU bi predvidevalo, da bi večji del strukture njegovega osebja sestavljalo stalno osebje namesto sedanje sestave, v kateri so pretežno policisti, ki jih države članice za ta namen začasno oprostijo redne dolžnosti.
Europol's transformation into an EU agency would be envisaged so that the main staff structure will be made up of permanent staff instead of the current composition that mainly consists of officers seconded from Member States.
S to spremembo bi se izognili velikemu številu prihodov in odhodov osebja, kar onemogoča ohranjanje skladnega pristopa pri razvoju Europolovih dejavnosti.
This change would avoid the high turnover that makes it difficult to maintain a consistent approach in the development of Europol's activities.
V primeru, da bi prišlo do tega preoblikovanja, bi se Europolove dejavnosti v celoti financirale neposredno iz proračuna EU in Evropski parlament bi mnogo lažje ocenjeval njegove dejavnosti.
In the case that this transformation takes place, Europol activities would be entirely financed directly from the EU budget and it would be much easier for the European Parliament to scrutinise its activities.
Poročevalec močno pozdravlja zamisel, da bi v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti vzpostavili skupni organ za nadzorovanje dejavnosti Europola.
The idea of setting up a joint body together with national parliaments in order to supervise Europol activities is very much welcomed by your rapporteur.
Reforma Europola bi pomenila tudi, da sklep Sveta ministrov nadomesti Konvencijo o Europolu, skupaj z njenimi tremi protokoli, ki se še ne izvajajo.
The reform of Europol would also entail the replacement of the Europol convention together with its three not yet implemented protocols by a decision of the Council of ministers.
Poročevalec jasno podpira prestrukturiranje Europola in njegovo preoblikovanje v agencijo EU, saj bo to poslancem Evropskega parlamenta omogočilo nadzor nad njegovimi dejavnostmi.
Your rapporteur clearly supports the restructuring of Europol and its transformation into an EU agency as this will allow MEPs to scrutinise its activities.
Šele takrat se lahko posvetovanje o plačah in dodatkih za osebje Europola obravnava kot dosledno in nekaj vredno.
Only then will this consultation on salaries and allowances of Europol staff be considered to be consistent and of some value.
Evropski parlament brez dvoma verjame v potrebo po podpori razvoju Europola kot učinkovitega orodja za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu v Evropski uniji.
The European Parliament clearly believes in the necessity to support the development of Europol as an effective tool to fight against organised crime in the European Union.
Zato izraža močno željo, da bi ga preoblikovali v polnopravno agencijo EU.
Therefore the Parliament expresses its strong desire to transform it into a fully fledged EU Agency.
Poročevalec meni, da bi bilo mnenje Evropskega parlamenta o finančnih zadevah osebja Europola koristno šele, ko bo izpeljano to preoblikovanje.
Your rapporteur believes that an opinion by the European Parliament concerning the financial matters to Europol staff would be considered relevant only when this transformation takes place.
Zaradi tega in v skladu z ustaljeno prakso Parlamenta poročevalec predlaga zavrnitev pobude, o kateri je bil Parlament zaprošen za mnenje.
It is for this reason, and in keeping with the Parliament’s established practice, that your rapporteur proposes the rejection of the initiative on which the Parliament is being consulted here.
Pobuda Republike Avstrije za sprejetje Sklepa Sveta o prilagoditvi osnovnih plač in dodatkov osebja Europola
Initiative by the Republic of Austria for adoption of a Council decision adjusting the basic salaries and allowances applicable to Europol staff
o pobudi Republike Avstrije z namenom sprejetja akta Sveta o spremembi kadrovskih predpisov Europola
on the initiative by the Republic of Austria with a view to the adoption of a Council Act amending Europol's Staff Regulations
PE 374.140v01-00
PE 374.140v02-00
– ob upoštevanju pobude Republike Avstrije (5428/2006)
– having regard to the initiative by the Republic of Austria (5428/2006)
– ob upoštevanju člena 44 akta Sveta z dne 3. decembra 1998 o kadrovskih predpisih, ki veljajo za osebje Europola (v nadaljevanju "kadrovski predpisi"),
– having regard to Article 44 of the Council Act of 3 December 1998 laying down the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees (hereinafter referred to as the 'staff regulations'),
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0073/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0073/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. julija 2005 o pobudi Velikega vojvodstva Luksemburg za sprejetje sklepa Sveta o prilagoditvi osnovnih plač in dodatkov osebja Europola
– having regard to its position of 7 July 2005 on the initiative by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg with a view to adopting a Council decision adjusting the basic salaries and allowances applicable to Europol staff
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0279/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0279/2006 ),
Evropski parlament je bil pozvan k podaji mnenja o pobudi Republike Avstrije z namenom sprejetja akta Sveta o spremembi kadrovskih predpisov Europola.
The European Parliament has been consulted on the initiative presented by the Republic of Austria with a view to adopting a Council Act amending Europol's Staff Regulations.
Namen avstrijskega predloga je prilagoditi pravila glede določb pogodbe o zaposlitvi za vse zaposlene.
The Austrian proposal aims at modifying the rules concerning the terms of contract for all employees.
Poleg tega namerava predlog, ki ga mora Svet sprejeti soglasno, dopolniti kadrovske predpise, še zlasti delovno razmerje urada finančnega nadzornika in sekretariata upravnega odbora.
Moreover the proposal, to be adopted by the Council acting unanimously, intends to update the staff regulation and in particular the employment relationship of the Financial controller's office and of the Management Board Secretariat.
Evropski parlament se zaveda pomena Europola kot zelo pomembnega dela varnostnega ustroja v EU.
The European Parliament is aware of the importance of Europol as a very important piece of the architectural security in the EU.
Napredek je bil dosežen na področjih sodelovanja in izmenjave informacij o analizi kriminalnih dejavnosti in organiziranem kriminalu.
Progress has been made as far as cooperation and exchange of information on criminal analysis and organised crime are concerned.
Poročevalec meni, da se morajo za nadaljnje sodelovanje pri varnostnih vprašanjih EU v državah članicah uporabljati skupni standardi, to pa lahko dosežemo le, če Europol postane polnopravna agencija EU.
Your rapporteur believes that in order to further cooperation on security issues in the EU, common standard have to be used within the member states and this can only be achieved if Europol becomes a fully fledged EU Agency.
Razvoj Europola je na dnevnem redu Evropske komisije
The development of Europol is on the agenda of the European Commission
Akcijski načrt Sveta in Komisije za izvajanje haaškega programa o krepitvi svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji, v Bruslju, 10. junija 2005, 9778/2/05 REV 2 JAI 207, str.
Council and Commission Action Plan implementing the Hague programme on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union, Brussels 10 June 2005, 9778/2/05 REV 2 JAI 207, p.
18. , ki bo morda v drugi polovici leta 2006 pripravila predlog za preoblikovanje te medvladne organizacije v organ EU.
18. which might put forward a proposal for the transformation of this intergovernmental organisation in an EU body in the second half of 2006.
Reorganizacija Europola naj bi bila tudi ena glavnih prednostnih nalog, s katerimi se bodo ukvarjali na srečanjih pravosodnih in notranjih ministrov EU.
The reorganisation of Europol seems to be also one of the top priorities in the EU justice and interior ministers meetings.
Delovna skupina Sveta pripravlja predloge za reformo, ki bodo predstavljeni najkasneje do srečanja pravosodnih in notranjih ministrov EU dne 1. junija 2006
Options for reform are being prepared by the working group in the Council and they will be presented in the EU justice and interior ministers meeting on the 1 June 2006
Prihodnost Europola, dokument s predlogi, rezultati razprave o prihodnosti Europola med avstrijskim predsedovanjem, maj 2006. .
Future of Europol, Option paper, reflecting the outcome of the discussion on the Future of Europol held during the Austrian Presidency, May 2006. at the latest.
Treba je revidirati mandat Europola za učinkovitejše delovanje in za izboljšanje čezmejnega policijskega sodelovanja.
Europol's mandate has to be revised to make it more effectively operational and in order to improve cross-border police cooperation.
Seveda je za stabilnost organizacije zelo pomembno izboljšati in dopolniti njene kadrovske predpise, saj bi to pomagalo ustvariti boljše delovno okolje.
It is, of course, of great importance for the stability of the organisation to improve and update its staff regulations as this would help to create a better working environment.