natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če ob predložitvi dokazil, ki jih zahteva odstavek 1, uporabnik plačilnih storitev še vedno trdi, da plačilna transakcija ni bila odobrena, zagotovi dejanske informacije ali elemente, ki omogočajo predpostavko , da ni odobril plačilne transakcije, niti ni goljufal ali ravnal zelo malomarno v zvezi z obveznostmi, ki mu jih nalaga člen 46(b).
If, on production of the evidence required under paragraph 1, the payment service user continues to deny having authorised the payment transaction, he shall provide factual information or elements to allow the presumption that he could not have authorised the payment transaction and that he did not act fraudulently or with gross negligence with regard to the obligations incumbent upon him under Article 46(b).
Če ob predložitvi dokazil, ki jih zahteva odstavek 1, uporabnik plačilnih storitev še vedno trdi, da plačilna transakcija ni bila odobrena, zagotovi dejanske informacije ali elemente, ki dokazujejo , da ni odobril plačilne transakcije, niti ni goljufal ali ravnal zelo malomarno v zvezi z obveznostmi, ki mu jih nalaga člen 46(b).
If, on production of the evidence required under paragraph 1, the payment service user continues to deny having authorised the payment transaction, he shall provide factual information or elements to prove that he could not have authorised the payment transaction and that he did not act fraudulently or with gross negligence with regard to the obligations incumbent upon him under Article 46(b).
Predlagana domneva bi enostransko obremenila ponudnika plačilnih storitev in postavila pod vprašaj obstoječi sistem podajanja dokazov pri postopkih, ki so podprti s PIN.
The proposed provision to allow a ‘presumption’ would shift the burden of proof to payment service providers and call into question the current system of documentary evidence for transactions using PIN numbers.
To bi lahko privedlo do brezskrbnega ravnanja z instrumenti za preverjanje plačila in do ogrožanja delovanja in učinkovitosti tega načina plačevanja, kar bi škodilo vsem.
That could lead to over-careless use of the payment verification instrument and jeopardise the effectiveness and operability of this method of payment to the detriment of all.
Uporaba instrumenta za preverjanje plačila, ki jo zabeleži ponudnik plačilnih storitev, sama po sebi ne zadostuje za ugotovitev, da je uporabnik plačilnih storitev odobril plačilo, niti da je uporabnik plačilnih storitev goljufal ali postopal zelo malomarno v zvezi s svojimi obveznostmi na podlagi člena 46.
The use of a payment verification instrument recorded by the payment service provider shall not, of itself, be sufficient to establish either that the payment was authorised by the payment service user or that the payment service user acted fraudulently or with gross negligence with regard to his obligations under Article 46.
Sprememba zaradi spremembe v členu 48(2)
Consequential on the amendment to Article 48(2).
Uporabnik plačilnih storitev krije izgubo, do največ 150 EUR, ki je posledica uporabe izgubljenega ali ukradenega instrumenta za preverjanje plačila in je nastala, preden je izpolnil svojo obveznost obvestiti ponudnika plačilnih storitev na podlagi člena 46(b), če ni goljufal ali ravnal zelo malomarno, zlasti s kršenjem svojih obveznosti varovanja iz člena 46 .
The payment service user shall bear the loss, up to a maximum of EUR 150, resulting from the use of a lost or stolen payment verification instrument and occurring before he has fulfilled his obligation to notify his payment service provider under Article 46(b) , provided he did not act fraudulently or with gross negligence, particularly by disregarding his obligations to exercise due care under Article 46 .
Sprememba zaradi pojasnitve, da omejitev odgovornosti velja samo za primere, ko uporabnik ni goljufal ali ravnal zelo nemarno.
The amendment seeks to establish that restricted liability applies only in cases where the user did not act fraudulently or with gross negligence.
Izvzetje iz načela prenosa soglasja
Exemption from the principle of transmission of consent
Za izvedbo tekočega plačila ali posameznega plačila lahko prejemnika plačila pooblasti plačnika, da izterja dolgovani znesek z navedenega računa pri njegovem ponudniku plačilnih storitev z direktno obremenitvijo in ga oprosti obveznosti vnaprejšnjega prenosa soglasja na ponudnika plačilnih storitev prejemnika plačila.
The payer may authorise the payee, for the purpose of making a series of regular payments or a single payment, to deduct a sum from a designated account with his payment service provider by direct debit, releasing the payee from the obligation to transmit consent beforehand to his payment service provider.
Siceršnje obveznosti prenosa informacij plačnika, zlasti glede razloga, načina, višine in cilja plačila, ostajajo nespremenjene.
This shall not affect any other requirements to transmit information to the payer, particularly as regards the reasons for, type, amount and purpose of the payment.
Oprostitev lahko sledi le, če prejemnik plačila:
This exemption can only be granted if the payee:
- plačniku prizna pravico, da plačilo prekliče tudi brez navedbe razlogov s preprosto obrazložitvijo njegovemu ponudniku plačilnih storitev v najmanj šestih tednih po tem, ko je izvedel za plačilno transakcijo
– accords the payer the right to recall the payment, even without providing reasons, by a simple declaration to his own payment service provider within at least six weeks of receiving notification of the payment transaction,
- sam ali prek svojega ponudnika plačilnih storitev zagotovi, da se prvotni dolgovani znesek brez nadaljnjih ukrepanj plačnika v celotni višini takoj ponovno knjiži v dobro njegovega računa in
– ensures, directly or through his payment service provider, that the sum originally debited is immediately credited in full to the payer’s account, without the need for any further action by the latter,
Uporabnost tega plačilnega instrumenta v nekaterih državah članicah bi morala s tem pravnim besedilom zaradi visokih stroškov zamudnega postopka, ki grozijo uporabniku, ostati zagotovljena.
The proposed provisions should ensure that this form of payment instrument can continue to be used in various Member States to ensure users are not faced with the prospect of being obliged to use more complicated and costly procedures.
ČLEN 59, ODSTAVEK 1
ARTICLE 59, PARAGRAPH 1
Ta oddelek se uporablja samo, če se ponudnika plačilnih storitev plačnika in prejemnika plačila nahajata v Skupnosti.
This Section shall apply only if the payment service providers of both the payer and the payee are located in the Community .
Ta oddelek se uporablja samo, če je plačilo izvedeno v eurih.
This Section shall apply only if the payment is made in euro .
Ta predlog spremembe se vlaga skupaj s predlogom spremembe člena 2 in omejuje obseg celotne direktive na plačila v Skupnosti ter obseg določb o času izvršitve (glej tudi predlog spremembe uvodne izjave 28) na euroobmočje.
This amendment is proposed together with the amendment to Article 2, restricting the scope of the whole Directive to payments within the Community, and the scope of provisions on execution time (vide also amendment to Recital 28) to the euro zone.
Vendar pa se do 1. januarja 2010 plačnik in njegov ponudnik plačilnih storitev lahko dogovorita za rok, ki ni daljši od treh dni.
However, up to 1 January 2010, a payer and his payment service provider may agree on a period no longer than three days .
Države članice zahtevajo, da plačnikov ponudnik plačilnih storitev s 1. januarjem 2012 zagotovi, da se po času sprejema naročeni znesek knjiži v dobro na plačilni račun prejemnika plačila, najpozneje ob koncu prvega delovnega dne banke po datumu sprejema.
Member States shall require the payer’s payment service provider to ensure , from 1 January 2012 onwards, that, after the point in time of acceptance, the amount ordered is credited to the payee’s payment account at the latest at the end of the first banking day following the point in time of acceptance.
Če je za menjavo valut potreben več kot en delovni dan banke, lahko plačnik in njegov ponudnik plačilnih storitev z izrecnim dogovorom določita drugače.
Where this time for the currency conversion requires more than one banking day, the payer and his payment service provider may provide otherwise by explicit agreement.
S tem predlogom spremembe se ohrani rok za običajno izvedbo d+1, kot ga je predlagala Komisija.
This amendment seeks to maintain the execution time proposed by the Commission (within one working day of the date of transaction).
Vsekakor pa mora ta rok postati obvezujoč šele s 1.1.2012.
Of course the execution time will not become a legal requirement until 1 January 2012.
Da bi strankam prepustili večjo raznolikost odločanja in da male ponudnike, ki ne razpolagajo z lastnim neposrednim dostopom do sistema izvajanja plačil, ne bi od vsega začetka izključili iz trga, mora biti še naprej možen drugačen posamezni dogovor.
However, in order to give customers greater choice and ensure that small providers of services which do not have their own direct access to a payment system are not automatically excluded from the market, it should continue to be possible for other arrangements to be made in individual cases by mutual agreement.
Poleg tega je ponudnik plačilnih storitev odgovoren za vse stroške, in za vse obresti, ki se zaračunajo uporabniku plačilnih storitev kot posledica neizvršitve ali napačne izvršitve plačilne transakcije.
In addition, the payment service provider shall be liable for any charges, and for any interest charged to the payment service user as a consequence of the non execution or defective execution of the payment transaction.
Dosledna odgovornost za neizvršeno ali napačno izvršeno transakcijo preneha s civilnopravnimi načeli odgovornosti, veljavnimi v vseh državah članicah
Strict liability for non-execution or defective execution of a payment transaction would infringe the applicable principles of liability in civil law in all Member States.
Če je plačilni nalog izvršen brez napak, mora s tem povezane stroške kriti uporabnik plačilnih storitev, če je tako predvideno v okvirni pogodbi.
If the execution of the payment transaction was not defective, the payment service user shall bear the cost involved, in so far as this is provided for in the framework contract.
Obveznost dokazovanja ponudnika, predvidena v odstavku 2, je sprejemljiva, če s tem povezane stroške v primeru izvršitve brez napak krije uporabnik.
The imposition of the burden of proof on the service provider under Article 67(2) should be approved on condition that, in the case of payments executed correctly, service users must bear the resulting costs.
Člen 68 Prenos v tretje države
Article 68
Po predlogu spremembe člena 2(1) je obseg direktive omejen na EU.
Following the amendment to Article 2(1) the scope of this Directive is limited to the EU.
Predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o plačilnih storitvah na notranjem trgu in o spremembi direktiv 97/7/ES, 2000/12/ES in 2002/65/ES
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on payment services in the internal market and amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2000/12/EC and 2002/65/EC
o pospeševanju prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh: „NAIADES“ – Celostni evropski akcijski program za prevoz po celinskih plovnih poteh
on the promotion of inland waterway transport: NAIADES, an integrated European Action Programme for inland waterway transport
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o spodbujanju uporabe celinskih plovnih poti Naiades ( KOM(2006)0006 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission on the promotion of inland waterway transport: NAIADES ( COM(2006)0006 ),
– ob upoštevanju bele knjige "Evropska prometna politika za leto 2010: čas odločitve",
– having regard to the white paper "European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to decide",
– ob upoštevanju ugotovitev srečanja na visoki ravni o celinski plovbi na Dunaju 15. februarja 2006,
– having regard to the findings of the inland navigation high level meeting held in Vienna on 15 February 2006,
– ob upoštevanju lizbonskega načrta za delovna mesta in rast,
– having regard the Lisbon agenda for jobs and growth,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0299/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0299/2006 ),
A. ker se pričakuje povečanje prometnih tokov in ker celinske plovne poti še vedno nudijo veliko prostih zmogljivosti in lahko prispevajo h konkurenčnim prometnim rešitvam ob uporabi kombinacije prevoznih sredstev,
A. whereas transport flows are expected to grow and inland waterways still offer a lot of free capacity and can contribute to competitive transport solutions using a combination of modes of transport,
B. ker Evropa potrebuje višje cilje, da bi v celoti izkoristila proste zmogljivosti celinskih plovnih poti in tržne možnosti celinske plovbe same po sebi in tudi kot dela večmodalnih prometnih verig po Evropi, vključno z javnimi in zasebnimi stranmi na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti, ter da bi s sorazmerno nizkimi infrastrukturnimi stroški povečali sposobnost povečevanja obsega prometa na celinskih plovnih poteh,
B. whereas greater ambition is needed in Europe in order to fully exploit more of the free capacity on inland waterways and the market potential of inland navigation in isolation and as a part of multi-modal transport chains across Europe, including public and private parties at national and Community level, and in order to increase the potential for raising the volume of transport on inland waterways with relatively low infrastructure costs,
C. ker je tesno sodelovanje med Evropsko komisijo, rečnimi komisijami, državami članicami in vsemi zainteresiranimi zasebnimi skupinami ključnega pomena za povečanje konkurenčnosti prevoza po plovnih poteh in njegov razvoj,
C. whereas close cooperation among the European Commission, the River Commissions, the Member States and all interested private parties is of essential importance to improving competitiveness and developing waterway transport,
Akcijski program Naiades
The NAIADES action programme
9. poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej objavi smernice za državno pomoč za sheme podpore prevozu po celinskih plovnih poteh in naj sprejme pravila „de minimis”, ki bodo ustrezno upoštevala potrebe sektorja rečne plovbe;
Asks the Commission to publish as soon as possible State aid guidelines for inland waterway transport support schemes and to adopt de minimis rules that take due account of the needs of the inland navigation sector;
15. poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z državami članicami in vsemi zadevnimi tretjimi državami pripravi evropski razvojni načrt, ki bi moral vsebovati posodobljen popis infrastrukture na evropskih celinskih plovnih poteh, ter naj priskrbi več podatkov o plovnih poteh, ki so potrebne vzdrževanja in drugih strukturnih izboljšav infrastrukture; nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj pri tem uporabi obstoječa dognanja znanstvenih raziskav in strokovnih poročil iz držav članic;
Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with Member States and any third countries involved, to draw up a European Development Plan which should contain an up-to-date inventory of the infrastructure on European inland waterways and to provide more information on waterways in need of maintenance and other structural improvements to infrastructure; also calls on the Commission, in doing so, to make use of the existing findings of scientific studies and expert reports in the Member States;
20. priznava, da so emisije tesno povezane s kakovostjo goriva, ki ga je mogoče dobiti na trgu; poziva Komisijo, naj takoj ko bo mogoče pripravi predlog, ki bo določil strožje standarde za gorivo za celinsko plovbo;
Acknowledging that emissions are closely linked to the quality of the fuel available on the market, invites the Commission to submit as soon as possible a proposal setting stricter standards for inland shipping fuels;
Zaposlovanje, strokovno znanje in podoba
Jobs, skills and image
26. poudarja pomen izvrševanja obstoječe socialne zakonodaje, da se zajamči dobre delovne pogoje;
Stresses the importance of enforcing existing social legislation, to safeguard good working conditions;
Institucionalni okvir
The institutional framework
- izvrševanje akcijskega programa Naiades;
- implementation of the NAIADES Action Programme;
- boljšo izmenjavo pridobljenega znanja in človeških virov na področju prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh med Skupnostjo, državami članicami in rečnimi komisijami;
- better exchange of acquired knowledge and human resources in the field of IWT between the Community, the Member States and the River Commissions;
Komisija je predstavila akcijski program Naiades za spodbujanje prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh.
The Commission has presented an Action Programme, NAIADES, in order to promote inland waterway transport (IWT).
Ugotavlja, da lahko prevoz po celinskih plovnih poteh, kot varen, okolju prijazen način prevoza z veliko prostih zmogljivosti svoje infrastrukture, prispeva k modalnemu prehodu in omili težave z zastoji, ki pestijo druge vrste prevoza.
It states that IWT, as a safe, environmentally friendly mode of transport with a lot of free capacity on its infrastructure, can contribute to modal shift and ease the congestion problems affecting other transport modes.
Akcijski program Komisije pokriva pet strateških področij: trg, flota, zaposlovanje in strokovna znanja, podoba ter infrastruktura.
The Commission's Action Programme covers five strategic areas: market, fleet, jobs and skills, image and infrastructure.
Vaša poročevalka podpira predpostavke in splošni načrt akcijskega programa Naiades.
Your Rapporteur supports the assumptions and the general outline of the NAIADES Action Programme.
Plovba po celinskih poteh nudi način za spopadanje z vrsto izzivov, povezanih s trajnostjo prometa in okolja, s katerimi se danes soočamo.
Inland waterway navigation offers a means of coping with several of the challenges connected with the sustainability of transport and the environment which we face today.
Zato je vredna večje politične pozornosti in v splošnem je potrebno več ambicije za povečanje pozitivnih učinkov sektorja prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh ter za izkoristek ogromnih možnosti, ki jih celinske plovne poti nudijo.
It therefore deserves more political priority and greater ambition is needed generally to improve the benefits of the IWT sector and to utilise the huge potential inland waterways offers.
Osredotočiti bi se bilo treba zlasti na zanesljivost infrastrukture in na povezave z drugimi vrstami prevoza, predvsem v pristaniščih na celinskih vodah in v morskih pristaniščih.
Particular attention should be given to the reliability of infrastructure and links to other transport modes, notably at inland ports and sea ports.
Zato bi plovba po celinskih vodah morala biti povezana z načrtovanjem rabe zemljišč in bolj bi se bilo treba potruditi, da se poveča trajnost plovbe po celinskih vodah, z uporabo čistejših goriv in plovil, ki po vrsti in velikosti ustrezajo plovni poti, na kateri se uporabljajo.
It should therefore be linked to land use planning and more effort should be made to make inland navigation more sustainable with the use of cleaner fuels and vessels that are appropriate in type and size for the particular waterway on which they are used.
Vaša poročevalka meni, da tak pristop lahko vodi do razvoja novih trgov, na katerih prevoz po celinskih plovnih poteh še ni na voljo kot možnost prevoza.
Your Rapporteur believes that such an approach can lead to the development of new markets where IWT has not yet been considered as an option.
Večino sektorja prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh sestavljajo mala družinska podjetja.
Most of the IWT sector consists of family-owned small enterprises.
To so podjetja, ki se sama vzdržujejo in delujejo predvsem/izključno z lastnim kapitalom.
They are self-sustaining businesses and operate primarily/solely with own capital.
Vseeno pa jim primanjkuje sredstev za temeljite spremembe.
However, they lack resources for radical innovation.
Politična podpora in spodbujevalne dejavnosti lahko pripomorejo, da sektor postane še bolj dejaven člen v sodobnih logističnih verigah.
Political support and promotional activities can help the sector to become an even more vital link in modern logistical chains.
Vaša poročevalka bi v tem začetnem poročilu rada poudarila naslednje dejavnike:
In this initiative report your Rapporteur would like to emphasize the following elements:
Razvoj trgov
Development of Markets
V zahodni Evropi se je trg prevozov po celinskih plovnih poteh občutno povečal, tako za tradicionalni prevoz razsutega tovora kot tudi za visoko cenjena tržišča prevoza zabojnikov.
In Western Europe the IWT market has grown considerably in traditional bulk transport and high-value markets for container transport.
Prevoz po celinskih plovnih poteh se je izkazal za posebno dober način za varen prevoz nevarnega tovora, kot so kemikalije in gorivo.
IWT has also proven to be a particularly good way to transport dangerous goods, such as chemical and fuels, safely.
Vseeno pa je možno razviti nove trge; industrija in špediterji včasih enostavno niso seznanjeni z možnostmi, ki jih nudi prevoz po celinskih plovnih poteh.
Still new markets can be developed; industry and freight forwarders sometimes simply are not aware of IWT's possibilities.
Trgovinska izmenjava med zahodno in vzhodno Evropo se po širitvi presenetljivo povečuje.
Following enlargement, trade exchanges between western and eastern Europe have been rising spectacularly.
To daje zagon razvoju novih trgov in lahko v splošnem poveča delež prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh pri prevozu blaga.
This gives impetus to the development of new markets and can in general increase the share of IWT in the transport of goods.
Dostop do finančnih sredstev in postopkovne ovire sta pomembni prepreki za razvoj trgov.
Access to finance and procedural barriers are significant hindrances to the development of markets.
Kar zadeva finance je pomembno, da imajo podjetja, ki se ukvarjajo s prevozi po celinskih plovnih poteh, navadno so to mala podjetja, možnost dostopati do kapitala.
When it comes to finance, it is important that IWT entrepreneurs, generally small businesses, find their way to and can get access to capital.
Zato vaša poročevalka podpira pobude Komisije za vzpostavitev "priročnika za financiranje" in da se predlaga smernice za državno pomoč za sektor prevozov po celinskih plovnih poteh.
For this reason your Rapporteur supports the Commission's initiatives to develop a "funding handbook" and to propose State aid guidelines for the IWT sector.
Primeri za možnosti financiranja so Evropski investicijski sklad, zagonsko sredstvo Evropske federacije delavcev v prometu, ukrep semenskega kapitala in pomoč z garancijami za MSP.
Examples of funding options are the European Investment Fund, the ETF start-up facility, Seed Capital Action and the SME Guarantee Facility.
Nadalje prevoz po celinskih plovnih poteh ovirajo tudi ozka grla postopkovne ali upravne narave.
Furthermore, IWT is often hampered by bottlenecks of a procedural or administrative nature.
Taka ozka grla prekinejo logistični postopek in oslabijo konkurenčni položaj prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh glede na druge vrste prevoza.
Such bottlenecks disrupt the logistical process and weaken the competitive position of IWT with regard to other modes of transport.
Včasih razlike v predpisih pri različnih načinih prevoza ali znotraj oziroma med pristanišči otežujejo tekoč razvoj prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh.
Sometimes different rules as between transport modes or within or between ports make the smooth development of IWT difficult.
Postopki, ki izvirajo iz zakonodaje, ki ni neposredno povezana s prometom, npr. direktive o odpadkih, varnosti hrane ali o okolju, prepogosto povzročajo ogromne birokratske težave za sektor prevoza po celinskih plovnih poteh.
Too often procedures arising from legislation not directly related to transport, e.g. directives concerning waste, food safety or the environment, cause enormous bureaucratic problems for the inland shipping sector.