natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vsaka država članica v skladu z ureditvami iz člena 35(2)) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji priznava pristojnost Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti za predhodno odločanje o veljavnosti in razlagi tega okvirnega sklepa.
Each Member State shall accept the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities to give preliminary rulings on the validity and interpretation of this Framework Decision in accordance with Article 35(2) of the Treaty on European Union.
Pobuda Kraljevine Švedske glede sprejetja Okvirnega sklepa o poenostavitvi izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi kazenskega pregona držav članic Evropske unije, zlasti glede težjih kaznivih dejanj, vključno s terorističnimi dejanji
Initiative by the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to the adoption of a Council Framework Decision on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union, in particular as regards serious offences, including terrorist acts
člen 39, odstavek 1, EU
Article 39(1) TEU
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o devetindvajseti spremembi Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic v zvezi z omejitvami pri trženju in uporabi nekaterih nevarnih snovi in pripravkov (snovi, razvrščene kot rakotvorne, mutagene ali strupene za razmnoževanje - r/m/r)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending, for the twenty-ninth time, Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (substances classified as carcinogen, mutagen or toxic to reproduction - c/m/r)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0638 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0638 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0136/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0136/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A6‑0163/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0163/2005 ),
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o devetindvajseti spremembi Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic v zvezi z omejitvami pri trženju in uporabi nekaterih nevarnih snovi in pripravkov (snovi, razvrščene kot rakotvorne, mutagene ali strupene za razmnoževanje - r/m/r)
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending, for the twenty-ninth time, Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (substances classified as carcinogen, mutagen or toxic to reproduction - c/m/r)
člena 251(2) in 95
Articles 251(2) and 95
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Martin Callanan, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Gyula Hegyi, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jorgensen, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Linda McAvan, Marios Matsakis, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Jonas Sjöstedt, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Martin Callanan, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Gyula Hegyi, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Linda McAvan, Marios Matsakis, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Jonas Sjöstedt, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o akcijskem načrtu Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the EU anti-terrorism Action Plan
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU (B6‑0071/2004)..............................................................14
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION (B6‑0071/2004)................................................14
MNENJE ODBORA ZA ZUNANJE ZADEVE .........................................................................16
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS.................................................16
o akcijskem načrtu Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu
on the EU anti-terrorism Action Plan
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga vlaga Antoine Duquesne v imenu skupine ALDE o revidiranem akcijskem načrtu/delovnem programu Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu ( B6‑0071/2004 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council submitted by Antoine Duquesne on behalf of the ALDE/ADLE Group on the revised EU anti-terrorism Action Plan/Work Programme ( B6‑0071/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo, predvsem členov I-3, I-2, I-9, II-62, II-63, II-64, II-67, II-82, II-107, II-108, II-109, II-110,III-257, III-261, III-271, III-272, III-273, III-275, III-276,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, and in particular Articles I-3, I-2, I-9, II-62, II-63, II-64, II-67, II-82, II-107, II-108, II-109, II-110, III-257, III-261, III-271, III-272, III-273, III-275 and III-276,
– ob upoštevanju členov 6 in 7 ter Naslova V Pogodbe EU,
– having regard to Articles 6 and 7 and Title V of the Treaty on European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Naslova VI Pogodbe EU, predvsem členov 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 39 in 42,
– having regard to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union and in particular Articles 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 39 and 42,
– ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, podpisane 4. novembra 1950 v Rimu in spremenjene s Protokolom št. 11, predvsem členov 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 in 10,
– having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950, as amended by Protocol No. 11 and in particular Articles 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10,
– ob upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah, podpisane 10. decembra 1948, predvsem členov 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 13 in 19,
– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed on 10 December 1948 and in particular Articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 13 and 19,
– ob upoštevanju dvanajstih konvencij Združenih narodov o boju proti terorizmu,
– having regard to the twelve UN anti-terrorism Conventions,
– ob upoštevanju Rimskega statuta Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, ki ga je 17. julija 1998 sprejela diplomatska konferenca pooblaščencev Združenih narodov,
– having regard to the Statute of Rome of the International Criminal Court adopted on 17 July 1998 by the UN Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries,
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta za boj proti terorizmu, sprejetega 21. septembra 2001 na izrednem Evropskem svetu v Bruslju,
– having regard to the anti-terrorism Action Plan adopted by the extraordinary European Council in Brussels on 21 September 2001,
– ob upoštevanju izjav voditeljev držav in vlad na neuradnem srečanju 19. oktobra 2001 v Gentu,
– having regard to the declarations of the informal meeting of Heads of State and Government in Ghent on 19 October 2001,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta 14. in 15. decembra 2001 v Laekenu,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Laeken on 14 and 15 December 2001,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta z dne 28. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi Eurojusta za okrepitev boja proti težjim oblikam kriminala
– having regard to the Council Decision of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime
UL L 63, 6.3.2002, str.
OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami
– having regard to Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States
UL L 190, 18.7.2002, str.
OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o boju proti terorizmu
– having regard to Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism
UL L 164, 22.6.2002, str.
OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p.
UL L 196, 2.8.2003, str.
OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 25. in 26. marca 2004,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Brussels on 25 and 26 March 2004,
– ob upoštevanju sklepnih ugotovitev mednarodnega vrha o demokraciji, terorizmu in varnosti, ki ga je organiziral Madridski klub v španskem glavnem mestu med 8. in 11. marcem 2005,
– having regard to the conclusions of the International Summit on Democracy, Terrorism and Security, organised by the Club of Madrid and held in the Spanish capital from 8 to 11 March 2005,
– ob upoštevanju izjave Evropskega sveta z dne 25. marca 200 o boju proti terorizmu,
– having regard to the declaration of the European Council of 25 March 2004 on combating terrorism,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 17. in 18. junija 2004,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Brussels on 17 and 18 June 2004,
– ob upoštevanju revidiranega akcijskega načrta/delovnega programa Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju 17. in 18. junija 2004,
– having regard to the revised EU anti-terrorism Action Plan/Work Programme adopted by the European Council at its meeting of 17 and 18 June 2004,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 4. in 5. novembra 2004,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Brussels on 4 and 5 November 2004,
– ob upoštevanju haaškega programa: krepitev svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji
– having regard to the Hague Programme: consolidation of freedom, security and justice in the European Union
UL C 53, 3.3.2005, str.
OJ C 53, 3.3.2005, p.
1. , ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet na zasedanju v Bruslju 4. in 5. novembra 2004,
1. , adopted by the European Council in Brussels on 4 and 5 November 2004,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 16. in 17. decembra 2004,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Brussels on 16 and 17 December 2004,
– ob upoštevanju členov 114(3) in 94 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 114(3) and Rule 94 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6‑0164/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0164/2005 ),
A. ker so človekove pravice brezpogojne, neodtujljive in neprenosljive in ker je najpomembnejša naloga demokracije zaščita svobode in temeljnih pravic državljanov ter ker boj proti terorizmu ne utemeljuje priprave zakonodaje, ki bi lahko imela posledice v nasprotju s tem ciljem.
A. whereas human rights are non-negotiable, indivisible and non-transferable, and the most important task of democracy is to protect the freedom and the fundamental rights of the citizens, and whereas in the interests of the fight against terrorism, no legislation should be drawn up which may have consequences running counter to that objective,
B. ker je učinkovito varstvo in učinkovito spodbujanje temeljnih pravic hrbtenica demokracije v Evropi in temeljni predpogoj priprave akcijskega načrta EU za boj proti terorizmu ,
B. whereas effective protection and promotion of fundamental rights is the backbone of democracy in Europe and is an essential precondition to the establishment of the EU anti-terrorism Action Plan,
C. ker ravno nasprotno terorizem ogroža temeljne svoboščine, spodbuja usodno socialno razdelitev, in je njegov namen nasilno uničiti demokracijo preko ustvarjanja ozračja ogroženosti, v katerem je kratena pravica ljudi do življenja v miru in svobodi,
C. whereas terrorism, on the other hand, attacks fundamental freedoms, stimulates harmful polarisation and seeks to destroy democracy itself by violent means, creating a climate destroying people's right to live in peace and freedom,
D. ker teroristična dejanja, ne glede na obliko, večinoma predstavljajo neposreden napad na pravice in svoboščine državljanov , kot so priznane v splošni izjavi o človekovih pravicah, na demokracijo in pravno državo,
D. whereas terrorist acts, in whatever form, are essentially a direct attack on citizens' rights and freedoms, as set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and on democracy and the rule of law,
E. ker je terorizem eden od najhujših ukrepov proti demokraciji, ena glavnih težav, s katero se srečujejo evropski državljani, ter nevaren napad na svoboščine iz Listine o temeljnih pravicah EU,
E. whereas terrorism is one of the most serious threats to democracy and one of the main problems facing European citizens, and whereas it seriously undermines the freedoms protected by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights,
F. ker grožnja s terorizmom ni omejena le na določeno zemljepisno območje, saj se teroristi za izvajanje nasilja in ustrahovanja lahko poslužujejo čezmejnih mrež ter lahko hkrati sprožijo uničujoče posledice v različnih državah;
F. whereas the threat of terrorism today is not limited to specific geographical areas, as terrorist organisations can use crossborder networks to carry out their acts of violence and terror, networks which are capable of having devastating effects in different countries at the same time,
G. ker se nobena od držav članic ne more sama spopasti s terorizmom in ker je potrebna skupna vzajemna politika boja proti terorizmu,
G. whereas no Member State can fight terrorism by itself, and a joint interoperational anti-terrorism policy is needed,
H. ker je za boj proti terorizmu potrebno uporabiti vse instrumente pravne države in Evropske unije;
H. whereas the fight against terrorism requires the use of all the instruments of the rule of law and of the European Union,
I. ker se morajo politične strategije EU na področju notranje in zunanje varnosti druga drugo dopolnjevati in morajo biti skladne ter ker se mora to kazati v delovanju njenih organov,
I. whereas the EU's internal and external security policies should be complementary and coherent, and this should be reflected in the functioning of its institutions,
K. ker v Evropi in po svetu obstajajo različne oblike terorizma, zaradi česar je nujno sprejeti specifične ukrepe za učinkovit boj proti njim,
K. whereas the fact that different forms of terrorism coexist in Europe and throughout the world makes it essential for specific measures to be taken to combat each form,
L. ker je Evropa zavezana načelom in vrednotam demokracije in ker dinamična civilna družba igra strateško vlogo pri nasprotovanju ekstremističnim ideologijam ter pri spodbujanju solidarnosti in spoštovanja kulturne raznolikosti,
L. whereas Europe promotes democratic principles and values, and a dynamic civil society fulfils a strategic role when it comes to countering extremist ideologies and fostering solidarity and respect for cultural diversity,
M. ker je treba nujno uporabiti ukrepe boja proti terorizmu, zlasti s spodbujanjem novih pobud za pomiritev in poseganje v družbe, ki jih zaznamujejo konflikti in razdeljenost, s sprejetjem pomoči, v zvezi s trgovino, in dolgoročnih vlaganj politike, kar omogoča boj proti revščini in krepi demokratične ustanove in preglednost na nacionalni in svetovni ravni s pobudami, primernimi za ta namen;
M. whereas it is necessary to implement measures for combating terrorism, notably through the promotion of new initiatives for peacemaking and mediation in societies which are marked by conflicts and division, by adopting long-term trade, aid and investment policies that advance the fight against poverty and help strengthen democratic institutions and transparency at national and at global level through initiatives which may contribute to these goals,
N. ker le demokracija in polno spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin lahko zagotovita učinkovit evropski odziv na boj proti terorizmu,
N. whereas only democracy and absolute respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms can guarantee an effective European response in the fight against terrorism,
P. ker je EU že pokazala solidarnost z žrtvami terorizma, še zlasti z naslednjimi ukrepi:
P. whereas the EU has already demonstrated its solidarity with the victims of terrorism, above all through:
· izjava z dne 25. marca 2004, v kateri je Evropski svet razglasil 11. marec za „evropski dan žrtev terorizma“;
- the Declaration of 25 March 2004 in which the European Council declared 11 March to be the European day of the victims of terrorism;
· sprejetje Direktive Sveta 2004/80/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o odškodnini za žrtve kaznivih dejanj
- the adoption of Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims
· pilotski program za financiranje psihološke in socialne pomoči žrtvam terorizma in njihovim družinam, uveden leta 2004;
- the establishment in 2004 of a pilot programme to fund projects for psychological, medical and social assistance to victims of terrorism and their families;
in ker je treba te ukrepe razviti in uresničiti,
and whereas these measures should be extended and updated,
Q. ker so žrtve terorizma povezane z demokracijo in ker morajo javni organi upoštevati glas žrtev, poznati njihovo resnico in zagotoviti, da jih bodo upoštevali pri sprejemanju odločitev o boju in porazu storilcev terorističnih dejanj,
Q. whereas the victims of terrorism are a reference for democracy and whereas the public authorities must heed their voice and ensure that they are taken into account in the places where decisions are made to combat those who have made them unwilling protagonists,
1. priporoča Svetu in Evropskemu svetu, da pri izvajanju revidiranega akcijskega načrta/delovnega programa Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu:
Addresses the following recommendations to the Council and the European Council for the implementation of the above-mentioned revised EU anti-terrorism Action Plan/Work in order to combat the terrorist threat:
a) ustanovi naj se evropska enota, pristojna za politike v korist žrtvam terorizma, pod odgovornostjo in neposredno pristojnostjo osrednjega evropskega koordinatorja za boj proti terorizmu.
a) that a European unit responsible for policies designed to assist the victims of terrorism be created under the direct authority and responsibility of the European Anti-Terrorism Coordinator.
Enota bo referenčna točka evropske politike v zvezi s tem in bo sprejemala in obveščala žrtve, jim prisluhnila in pomagala ter spodbujala izvajanje ukrepov, ki so potrebni za zagotavljanje uspešnega vodenja.
This unit will be a reference point for European policy in this field and its purpose will be to take in, listen to, inform and assist victims and to promote implementation of the measures which are necessary if it is to operate successfully.
Komisija in evropski koordinator za boj proti terorizmu vsako leto poročata Evropskemu parlamentu o poteku dejavnosti.
Each year the Commission and the European Anti-Terrorism Coordinator will provide the European Parliament with a report on their activities.
Evropski parlament poročilo oceni in po potrebi predlaga potrebne ukrepe.
Parliament will assess that report and, where appropriate, suggest any action which it thinks should be taken.
Enota bo vsaj enkrat letno sklicala Evropski forum žrtev terorizma, ki bo združil predstavnike ustanov Evropske unije, Sveta Evrope, parlamentov in nacionalnih vlad, kot tudi združenj in fundacij žrtev terorizma.
The unit will organise a European Forum for the Victims of Terrorism, to be attended by representatives of the EU institutions, the Council of Europe and the Member States' parliaments and governments, and also by representatives of associations and foundations for victims of terrorism.
Glavni cilj foruma je zagotoviti, da glasu žrtev redno prisluhnejo in upoštevajo pristojni organi;
The Forum's most important task will be to ensure that the appropriate authorities listen to what the victims have to say and take relevant action periodically;
b) Evropski uniji in državam članicam se predlaga, naj v okviru Združenih narodov podprejo prizadevanja za čim hitrejše sprejetje svetovne definicije terorizma in sklepa Svetovne konvencije o mednarodnem terorizmu; naj v zvezi s tem razmislijo o morebitnem vpisu terorističnih napadov na seznam kaznivih dejanj, za katera je pristojno Mednarodno kazensko sodišče in ki nimajo roka zapadlosti ter se jih lahko preiskuje v katerem koli delu sveta, hkrati pa jih zakonodaja Skupnosti in mednarodna zakonodaja pravno opredeljujeta kot najhujša in najbolj nesprejemljiva dejanja.
b) that the support of the EU and Member States be enlisted, within the framework of the UN, for the moves under way to adopt a global definition of terrorism and to reach as swift an agreement as possible on the Global Convention on International Terrorism, and that, in this context, consideration be given to specific terrorist attacks possibly being listed with the crimes that come within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, thus advocating that these crimes not be time-barred, be prosecutable anywhere in the world and be judicially included among those considered most serious and inadmissible by Community and international law.
Spodbuja naj se še neupoštevanje roka zapadlosti kaznivih dejanj terorizma v državah članicah, z izražanjem obsojanja mednarodne skupnosti, ki jih šteje med najhujše in najbolj nesprejemljive zločine proti človeštvu;
At the same time, terrorist crimes in the Member States should not be time-barred, thereby reflecting the reprobation of the international community, which considers them to be some of the most serious and inadmissible crimes against humanity;
c) skladno z duhom Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo se spodbuja sodelovanje med nacionalnimi organi in javnimi tožilstvi ter Eurojustom, da se zagotovi preiskava, pravni pregon in sojenje storilcem in sostorilcem čezmejnih hudih kaznivih dejanj, predvsem terorističnih dejanj ter da si prizadeva za vzpostavitev pravnih pogojev, ki omogočajo ustanovitev evropskega javnega tožilstva za izpolnitev teh ciljev;
c) that, in accordance with the spirit of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, cooperation between national authorities, public prosecutors and Eurojust be promoted in order to investigate, pursue and sentence all perpetrators of serious cross-border crimes, particularly the crime of terrorism, and their accomplices, and that the legal conditions be established to enable a European Public Prosecutor's Office to be set up to pursue those objectives;
d) spodbuja se preoblikovanje Europola v organ Evropske unije pod demokratičnim nadzorom Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter v pristojnosti Sodišča; v tem smislu naj se še pred začetkom veljavnosti Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo oblikuje skupna pravna podlaga za delovanje Europola;
d) that the transformation of Europol into a EU body under the democratic control of the European Parliament and the Council and under the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice be promoted, and that to this end a common legal basis now be created for the work of Europol prior to the entry into force of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe;