natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Lahko bodo tudi razmislile, kako upoštevati druge strategije na ravni EU, kot so Akcijski načrt za ekološko kmetovanje , zadnje Sporočilo Komisije o obnovljivi energiji , nedavno Sporočilo Komisije o podnebnih spremembah in potrebi po preprečevanju verjetnih vplivov na kmetovanje in gozdarstvo ter poročilo Komisije o gozdarski strategiji EU (ki lahko pomaga pri rasti in zaposlovanju ter trajnostnih ciljih) ter prihodnje tematske okoljske strategije.
They will also wish to reflect on how to take into account other EU level strategies such as the Action Plan for Organic Farming, the latest Commission Communication on Renewable Energy the Commission’s recent Communication on Climate Change and the need to anticipate the likely effects on farming and forestry, and the Commission’s report on the EU Forestry Strategy (which can help deliver on both the growth and employment and the sustainability objectives) and the forthcoming thematic environmental strategies.
Države članice morajo celovito pristopiti k izdelavi nacionalnih strategij, pri čemer morajo poskrbeti za ustrezno prostorsko načrtovanje, zagotoviti, da bodo sinergije med cilji čim večje , ter si prizadevati za čim širšo udeležbo vseh pristojnih in ustreznih organov v skladu z načelom partnerstva, kot ga določa člen 6 Uredbe Sveta o podpori za razvoj podeželja .
In working out their national strategies, Member States should take an integrated approach, embodying appropriate spatial planning and maximising synergies between the axes and should seek the broadest possible involvement of all competent authorities and appropriate bodies, under the Partnership Principle as referred to in Article 6 of the Council Regulation on support for rural development.
Lahko bodo tudi razmislile, kako upoštevati druge strategije na ravni EU, kot so Akcijski načrt za ekološko kmetovanje , zadnje Sporočilo Komisije o obnovljivi energiji , nedavno Sporočilo Komisije o podnebnih spremembah in potrebi po preprečevanju verjetnih vplivov na kmetovanje in gozdarstvo ter poročilo Komisije o gozdarski strategiji EU (ki lahko pomaga pri rasti in zaposlovanju ter trajnostnih ciljih) ter prihodnje tematske okoljske strategije.
They will also wish to reflect on how to take into account other EU level strategies such as the Action Plan for Organic Farming, the latest Commission Communication on Renewable Energy, the Commission’s recent Communication on Climate Change and the need to anticipate the likely effects on farming and forestry, and the Commission’s report on the EU Forestry Strategy (which can help deliver on both the growth and employment and the sustainability objectives) and the forthcoming thematic environmental strategies.
Priloga, oddelek 3.6, smernica
Annex, section 3.6, Guideline
Glavna vodilna načela glede razmejitvene linije in koordinacijskih mehanizmov med ukrepi, ki jih podpirajo različni skladi, je treba opredeliti na ravni nacionalnega strateškega referenčnega okvira/nacionalnega strateškega načrta.
The main guiding principles as regards the demarcation line and the coordination mechanisms between actions supported by the different Funds should be defined at the level of national strategic reference framework/national strategy plan.
Potrebno je spodbujati sinergijo med strukturno, zaposlitveno in razvojno politiko podeželja ter politiko socialne vključenosti, pa tudi sodelovanje različnih regionalnih partnerjev .
Synergy between structural, employment, social inclusion and rural development policies and cooperation between different regional partners need to be encouraged.
V tem kontekstu morajo države članice v skladu s svojo institucionalno strukturo zagotoviti komplementarnost in skladnost med ukrepi, ki naj bi se financirali iz TEN-T, LIFE +, ESRR, kohezijskega sklada, ESS, ESR in EKSRP na danem ozemlju in danem področju dejavnosti.
In this context, Member States should , in accordance with their institutional structure, ensure complementarity and coherence between actions to be financed by TEN -T, LIFE+, the ERDF, Cohesion Fund, ESF, EFF and EAFRD on a given territory and in a given field of activity.
Glavna vodilna načela glede razmejitvene linije in koordinacijskih mehanizmov med ukrepi, ki jih podpirajo različni skladi, je treba opredeliti na ravni regionalnega in/ali nacionalnega strateškega referenčnega okvira/ regionalnega in/ali nacionalnega strateškega načrta, kot je primerno za posamezno državo članico.
The main guiding principles as regards the demarcation line and the coordination mechanisms between actions supported by the different Funds should be defined at the level of regional and/or national strategic reference framework/ regional and/or national strategy plan , as appropriate to the Member State concerned.
Upoštevati je treba načelo „en sklad za en program“.
The one Fund per Programme principle should be observed.
Priloga, oddelek 3.6, odstavek 2
Annex, section 3.6, paragraph 2
Za razvoj človeškega kapitala bi se podpora za razvoj podeželja usmerila na kmete , njihove družine in gospodarske udeležence, vključene v diverzifikacijo podeželskega gospodarstva , ob usklajevanju s podporo v okviru drugih strukturnih instrumentov .
As regards the development of human capital, support under rural development would target farmers , their families and the economic actors involved in the diversification of the rural economy and be coordinated with support afforded under other structural instruments .
Diverzifikacija podeželskega gospodarstva je ključna ekonomska gonilna sila na podeželju, vendar mora razvoj tega gospodarstva ostati prilagodljiv, zato ga ne kaže zavirati z omejevanjem vrst finančne podpore na izključno sredstva za razvoj podeželja.
Diversification of the rural economy is a crucial economic driver in rural areas but its development must be as flexible as possible and must not be constrained by restricting the type of funding available for its promotion purely to the rural development instrument.
Priloga, oddelek 4, odstavek 2
Annex, section 4, paragraph 2
Predlog Odločbe Sveta o strateških smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja (Programsko obdobje 2007–2013)
Proposal for a Council decision on Community strategic guidelines for Rural Development (Programming period 2007-2013)
Predlog Odločbe Sveta o strateških smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja (Programsko obdobje 2007- 2013)
Proposal for a Council Decision on Community strategic guidelines for Rural Development (Programming period 2007-2013)
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1348/2000 z dne 29. maja 2000 o vročanju sodnih in zunajsodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................10
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................8
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0305 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0305 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2), 61(c) in 67(5) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0232/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 61(c) and 67(5) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0232/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0024/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0024/2005 ),
(9a) Komisija in države članice si morajo po svojih najboljših močeh prizadevati, da zagotovijo posodabljanje in popolnost podatkov o organih za sprejemanje in pošiljanje, ki so na voljo v Evropskem pravosodnem atlasu v civilnih zadevah, zlasti kar zadeva vse ustrezne podatke za vzpostavitev stika.
(9a) The Commission and the Member States should do their utmost to ensure that information concerning receiving and transmitting agencies displayed in the European Judicial Atlas in Civil Matters is up to date and complete, especially in terms of all relevant contact details.
Organ za sprejem mora ustno, kjer je to mogoče, in v vsakem primeru pisno z uporabo standardnega obrazca iz Priloge poučiti naslovnika, da lahko zavrne sprejem listine za vročitev v času vročitve ali z vrnitvijo listine v enem tednu od časa vročitve, če ni napisana ali prevedena v jezik, ki ga naslovnik razume, razen če je listina napisana ali prevedena v uradni jezik zaprošene države članice ali, če je v tej državi več uradnih jezikov, v uradni jezik ali v enega od uradnih jezikov kraja, kjer je treba opraviti vročitev."
The receiving agency shall inform the addressee, where possible, orally, and in any case in writing using the standard form in the Annex that he or she may refuse to accept the document to be served at the time of service or by returning the document within one week of that time if it is in a language other than either of the following languages and not accompanied by a translation into one of these languages:
(a) v uradnem jeziku zaprošene države članice ali, če je v tej državi več uradnih jezikov, v uradnem jeziku ali v enem od uradnih jezikov kraja, kjer je treba opraviti vročitev; ali
(a) the official language of the Member State addressed or, if there are several official languages in that Member State, the official language or one of the official languages of the place where service is to be effected; or
(b) v jeziku, ki ga naslovnik razume.
(b) a language which the addressee understands. ”
Uporaba veznika "ali" v prvotni frazi je dvoumna in omogoča dva različna načina zavrnitve:
The use of ‘or’ makes the original wording ambiguous and appears to allow two different situations in which the addressee may refuse:
- naslovnik lahko zavrne listino, napisano ali prevedeno v uradni jezik zaprošene države, če tega jezika ne razume;
- the addressee can refuse a document written in or translated into the official language of the receiving state if s/he does not understand that language;
- naslovnik lahko prav tako zavrne listino, ki ni bila napisana ali prevedena v uradni jezik zaprošene države, kljub temu, da je bila listina napisana ali prevedena v jezik, ki ga razume.
- the addressee can also refuse the document if it has not been written in or translated into an official language of the receiving Member State, even if it has been written in or translated into a language s/he understands.
Če je naslovnik zavrnil sprejem listine pod pogoji iz odstavka 1, se lahko vročitev listine popravi z vročitvijo naslovniku v skladu z določbami te uredbe o prevodu listine v jezik, določen v odstavku 1.
If the addressee has refused to accept the document under the conditions of paragraph 1, the service of the document can be rectified through the service on the addressee in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation of a translation of the document into a language provided for in paragraph 1.
Če je naslovnik zavrnil sprejem listine pod pogoji iz odstavka 1, se mora v primeru, da se želi nadaljevati s postopkom, vročitev listine popraviti z vročitvijo naslovniku v skladu z določbami te uredbe o prevodu listine v jezik, določen v odstavku 1.
If the addressee has refused to accept the document under the conditions of paragraph 1, where the intention is to continue the procedure, the service of the document must be rectified through the service on the addressee in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation of a translation of the document into a language provided for in paragraph 1.
V tem primeru je dan vročitve listine dan, na katerega se vroči prevod v skladu s pravom zaprošene države članice.
In that case, the date of service of the document shall be the date on which the translation is served in accordance with the law of the Member State addressed.
Če je naslovnik listine že uveljavljal pravico zavrnitve listine v skladu z odstavkom 1, morajo biti naknadno vročene listine v okviru iste zadeve napisane ali prevedene v jezik, ki ga naslovnik razume, ali v uradni jezik zaprošene države članice."
Where the addressee of a document has already exercised the option of refusal pursuant to paragraph 1, documents subsequently served in the same case must be written in or translated into a language understood by the addressee or an official language of the receiving Member State ”.
Zaradi izraza "se lahko popravi"člen 8 nima smisla, saj pošiljanje prevoda listine spremeni v možnost in ne obveznost.
The wording ‘can be rectified’ robs Article 8 of its meaning by making the sending of a translation into an option rather than an obligation.
Treba je nakazati pripravljenost zaščitit pravice prosilca.
The aim of protecting the applicant’s rights must be specifically stated.
V primerih, ko je naslovnik že uveljavil možnost zavrnitve listine v skladu s prvim odstavkom, mora biti seznanjen s tem, da bi morale biti naknadno vročene listine v okviru iste zadeve napisane ali prevedene v jezik, ki ga prejemnik razume.
Where an applicant has already exercised the option of refusal when a document was served, in accordance with paragraph 1, it must be ensured that documents subsequently served in the same case are always written in or translated into a language understood by the addressee.
Kadar je treba v skladu s pravom države članice listino vročiti v določenem roku, da se varujejo pravice prosilca , je za prosilca odločilen tisti dan vročitve, ki ga predpisuje pravo te države članice.
However, where according to the law of a Member State a document shall be served within a particular period in order to preserve the rights of the applicant, the date to be taken into account with respect to the applicant shall be that fixed by the law of that Member State.”
Kadar je treba v skladu s pravom države članice listino vročiti v določenem roku, je za prosilca, da se varujejo njegove pravice ,odločilen tisti dan vročitve, ki ga predpisuje pravo te države članice.
However, where according to the law of a Member State a document shall be served within a particular period in order to preserve the rights of the applicant, the date to be taken into account with respect to the applicant shall be that fixed by the law of that Member State.”
Ta podrobnejša opredelitev je potrebna, da se nakaže pripravljenost zaščiti prosilca.
The change is necessary in order to make clear the intention of protecting the applicant.
Predlog spremembe
(Translator’s note: this amendment does not affect the English version.)
„Člen 14
“Article 14
Vročanje s poštnimi storitvami
Service by postal services
Vsaka država članica ima pravico, da osebam, ki prebivajo v drugi državi članici, vroči sodne listine neposredno s poštnimi storitvami s priporočenim pismom s potrdilom o prejemu ali z ekvivalentom.“
Each Member State shall be free to effect service of judicial documents directly by postal services to persons residing in another Member State by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt or equivalent.”
Vsaka država članica ima pravico, da osebam, ki prebivajo v drugi državi članici, vroči sodne in zunajsodne listine neposredno s poštnimi storitvami s priporočenim pismom s potrdilom o prejemu ali z ekvivalentom.“
Each Member State shall be free to effect service of judicial and extrajudicial documents directly by postal services to persons residing in another Member State by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt or equivalent.”
„Člen 15
“Article 15
Neposredno vročanje
Direct service
Ta uredba ne posega v pravico vsake osebe, ki ima interes v sodnem postopku, da vroči sodne listine neposredno po sodnih uradnikih, uradnikih ali drugih pristojnih osebah zaprošene države članice.“
This Regulation shall not interfere with the freedom of any person interested in a judicial proceeding to effect service of judicial documents directly through the judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the Member State addressed.”
Ta uredba ne posega v pravico vsake osebe, ki ima interes v sodnem postopku, da vroči sodne in zunajsodne listine neposredno po sodnih uradnikih, uradnikih ali drugih pristojnih osebah zaprošene države članice.“
This Regulation shall not interfere with the freedom of any person interested in a judicial proceeding to effect service of judicial and extrajudicial documents directly through the judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the Member State addressed.”
On 29 May 2000 the Council, having consulted the European Parliament, adopted Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 in order to expedite and improve the transmission of judicial and extrajudicial documents between Member States of the European Union.
On 29 May 2000 the Council, having consulted the European Parliament, adopted Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 in order to expedite and improve the transmission of judicial and extrajudicial documents between Member States of the European Union.
This regulation on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters is based on the Convention on the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters, signed at The Hague on 15 November 1965.
This regulation on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters is based on the Convention on the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters, signed at The Hague on 15 November 1965.
It improves a number of provisions of this Convention.
It improves a number of provisions of this Convention.
A regulation in this area is essential if the single market is to function properly and for the legal security of transactions.
A regulation in this area is essential if the single market is to function properly and for the legal security of transactions.
Measures to reduce the transmission times of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters form part of a more general effort to develop the mutual legal aid necessary for achieving a European area of freedom, security and justice.
Measures to reduce the transmission times of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters form part of a more general effort to develop the mutual legal aid necessary for achieving a European area of freedom, security and justice.
Application of the regulation
Application of the regulation
The studies and consultations
The studies and consultations
December 2002: debate in the European judicial network in civil and commercial matters.
December 2002: debate in the European judicial network in civil and commercial matters.
July 2003: public hearing on the application of the Regulation.
July 2003: public hearing on the application of the Regulation.
April 2004: convocation of a meeting of the Advisory committee on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters (as provided for in Article 18 of the Regulation)
April 2004: convocation of a meeting of the Advisory committee on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters (as provided for in Article 18 of the Regulation)
May 2004: study commissioned from the MainStrat consultancy on implementation of the Regulation.
May 2004: study commissioned from the MainStrat consultancy on implementation of the Regulation.
February 2005: second hearing. organised by the Commission underscore the fact that Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 has significantly expedited and improved the transmission of judicial and extra-judicial documents between participant Member States.
February 2005: second hearing. organised by the Commission underscore the fact that Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 has significantly expedited and improved the transmission of judicial and extra-judicial documents between participant Member States.
However, they also point to a number of problems, in particular:
However, they also point to a number of problems, in particular:
- the failure to meet deadlines, even if the situation has improved compared to the past (the average duration is between one to three months, but it is as much as 6 months in some cases);
- the failure to meet deadlines, even if the situation has improved compared to the past (the average duration is between one to three months, but it is as much as 6 months in some cases);
- the failure to use forms established by the regulation;
- the failure to use forms established by the regulation;
- the lack of information for the addressee about the right to refuse a document;
- the lack of information for the addressee about the right to refuse a document;
- the high cost and lack of transparency of the processing costs in some states (up to 150 euros);
- the high cost and lack of transparency of the processing costs (which should not exceed €150) in some states;
- the poor training of the personnel responsible for applying the Regulation.
- the poor training of the personnel responsible for applying the Regulation.
The proposal for amendment put forward by the Commission is intended to address the problems identified in implementing Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000.
The proposal for amendment put forward by the Commission is intended to address the problems identified in implementing Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000.
It is intended to:
It is intended to:
- further reduce transmission times by introducing an obligation to effect the service within one month of receipt of the document by the receiving agency;
- further reduce transmission times by introducing an obligation to effect the service within one month of receipt of the document by the receiving agency;
- draw up a new multilingual form informing the addressee of his right to refuse a document;
- draw up a new multilingual form informing the addressee of his right to refuse a document;
- establish a common period of one week during which the addressee may refuse to receive the document by returning it;
- establish a common period of one week during which the addressee may refuse to receive the document by returning it;
- ensure that the addressee understands the document.
- ensure that the addressee understands the document.
Your rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a regulation which marks an important stage in the creation of the European judicial area.
Your rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a regulation which marks an important stage in the creation of the European judicial area.
He supports the proposed amendments, since they will create greater legal security for the applicant and the addressee.
He supports the proposed amendments, since they will create greater legal security for the applicant and the addressee.
They will ensure greater transparency and speed in the service of judicial and extra-judicial documents.
They will ensure greater transparency and speed in the service of judicial and extra-judicial documents.
Your rapporteur is in favour of the following amendments:
Your rapporteur is in favour of the following amendments:
- Article 11: introduction of a fixed fee to remove the lack of transparency in this area;
- Article 11: introduction of a fixed fee to remove the lack of transparency in this area;
- Article 14: uniform provision on postal services;
- Article 14: uniform provision on postal services;
- Article 15: direct service;
- Article 15: direct service;
- Articles 17 and 23: elimination of the obligation to adopt, by Commission decision, a manual of receiving agencies and a glossary as well as the obligation to publish the information communicated by the Member States in the Official Journal.
- Articles 17 and 23: elimination of the obligation to adopt, by Commission decision, a manual of receiving agencies and a glossary as well as the obligation to publish the information communicated by the Member States in the Official Journal.
Your rapporteur believes that one point has not been completely resolved in amending the Regulation, namely the right to refuse a document (Article 8).
Your rapporteur believes that one point has not been completely resolved in amending the Regulation, namely the right to refuse a document (Article 8).