natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
K. ob upoštevanju, da naj bi s strani Komisije predlagan način financiranja treh predstavljenih ukrepov potekal iz naslova 1% modulacije oziroma nacionalnih programov za razvoj podeželja, s čimer po mnenju strokovnjakov še zdaleč ne bodo zagotovljena sredstva, ki jih zahtevajo predlagani ukrepi,
K. whereas the Commission is proposing that the said measures be financed from 1 % of funds from modulation, or more precisely from national rural development programmes, which, according to expert opinion, will probably cover nowhere near the resources required for the measures proposed,
L. ker so mladi kmetje še posebej ranljivi v primeru težav in nesreč, saj so zaradi nakupa kmetije pogosto močno zadolženi,
L. whereas young farmers are especially vulnerable to crises and disasters, as they are often deeply in debt as a result of buying their farm,
M. ker so nove države članice do leta 2013 izvzete iz mehanizma modulacije in se bodo neposredna plačila v teh državah postopno povečevala do končnega zneska (postopno uvajanje), je treba zagotoviti, da imajo dostop do drugih sredstev v okviru skupne kmetijske politike (SKP),
M. whereas the new Member States are excluded from the modulation mechanism until 2013, and direct payments in these countries are subject to a gradual increase to the full amount (phasing-in), and it should therefore be ensured that they have access to other CAP funding,
- javne in zasebne zavarovalniške družbe, ter vzajemne zavarovalnice (zadruge) bi morale izvajati neposredne zavarovalniške posle za zavarovanje tveganj, ki jih je možno zavarovati neodvisno ali po vključitvi v kmetijsko zavarovalno shemo;
- the insurance companies, public or private, and the mutual insurance cooperatives should carry out direct insurance business for the insurance of insurable risks either independently or after joining an agricultural insurance scheme;
- država bi se morala omejiti na kritje tveganj, povezanih z nesrečami, ki jih ni možno zavarovati; pod določenimi pogoji bi bilo potrebno dovoliti državno financiranje takih dejavnosti;
- States should be restricted to covering uninsurable disaster risks and State funding for such activities should be allowed under certain conditions;
- potrebno bi bilo dovoliti državne subvencije zavarovalnih premij in državno financiranje pozavarovanja zavarovalnih družb ter jih uskladiti z okvirom EU;
- State subsidies of insurance premiums, State funding for reinsurance of insurance companies, to be compatible with the EU framework, should be allowed;
- vključevanje zavarovalcev in zavarovanih kmetov bi bilo prostovoljno;
- the participation of the insurers and the farmers insured should be voluntary;
- financiranje Skupnosti bi krilo del stroškov vzpostavitve in delovanja shem za zavarovanje kmetijskega dohodka;
- there will be Community funding to cover part of the cost of setting up and operating schemes to safeguard agricultural income,
- tako nacionalno financiranje kot financiranje Skupnosti bi bilo v skladu s trenutnimi ali bodočimi določili sporazumov STO;
- both national and Community funding will be consistent with the current or future provisions of WTO agreements,
4. v zvezi s tem opozarja na čedalje večjo škodo, ki nastaja zaradi podnebnih sprememb in naravnih nesreč, kot so poplave, suša, požari, pa tudi na škodo, ki nastaja zaradi živalskih kužnih bolezni in ki se zaradi prevozov živali in nezakonitega uvoza na mednarodni ravni hitro širi;
Refers in this connection to the increasing damage caused by climate change and natural disasters such as flooding, drought and fires, and the damage caused by animal diseases, which are being spread more rapidly at the international level through the transport of animals and illegal imports;
6. meni, da mora predlog Komisije upoštevati tržne krize, ki močno prizadevajo proizvajalce v Skupnosti in ki so posledica motenj v kmetijski trgovini, nastalih zaradi omejitev izvoza kmetijskih izdelkov iz Skupnosti, ki so jih uvedle tretje države; poziva zato Komisijo, naj razširi definicijo krize;
Considers that the Commission proposal should take into account the market crises, which greatly affect Community producers, resulting from the restrictions on exports of agricultural products to outside the Community introduced by third countries; calls on the Commission to extend the definition of a crisis to cover the above issue;
- pomoči za skladiščenje v primeru izrazitega padca cen;
- aid for storage in the event of a sharp fall in prices,
- pomoči za predelavo z namenom razbremenitve trga v primerih, ko je taka rešitev izvedljiva;
- aid for processing in order to decongest the market in cases where that solution is feasible,
- ukrepov za zmanjšanje možnih negativnih vplivov na javno mnenje in zmanjšanje njihovih posledic (na primer v zvezi z uživanjem govejega mesa po krizi BSE);
- measures to mitigate the possible negative impact on public opinion and minimisation of its effects (as, for example, in the case of the consumption of beef after the BSE crisis),
- pomoči za prostovoljno omejitev proizvodnje, če se obetajo težave glede možnosti razprodaje;
- aid for voluntary production cutbacks if the prospects indicate difficulties in finding market outlets;
12. meni, da je sofinanciranje ukrepov za preprečevanje tveganj in krizno upravljanje s strani Komisije, držav članic, kmetijske industrije in kmetijskih gospodarstev sprejemljivo, če lahko postane obvezno in če ne povzroči neenakosti med državami članicami in skupinami kmetov;
Considers co‑financing by the Commission, the Member States, the farming industry and farm holdings of measures for preventing risks and dealing with crises to be acceptable, provided that it can be made mandatory and does not lead to inequalities between Member States and groups of farmers;
14. poziva Komisijo, naj glede na to, da obseg sredstev iz modulacije niha na različnih ravneh za vsako državo članico, preuči nadomestne vire financiranja teh ukrepov, ki naj bodo prepuščeni presoji države članice, na primer odstotek, ki se določi na podlagi bruto vrednosti njihove kmetijske proizvodnje;
Calls on the Commission, in view of the fact that the volume of resources from modulation fluctuates at different levels for each Member State, to examine alternative sources of funding for these measures, which will be at the discretion of the Member States, for example a percentage determined on the basis of the gross value of their agricultural production;
Možnost 1: Naravne nesreče: sofinanciranje zasebnega zavarovanja
Option 1: Financial contribution towards premium payments for private insurance against natural disasters
a) je to najbolj zanesljiv in preizkušen, z institucionalnega vidika najbolj celosten in najbolj poznan ter uporabljan instrument na trgu,
(a) it is the most tried and tested tool on the market, institutionally the most integrated and the most well-known and applied,
b) je iz navedenih razlogov primernejše kot drugi instrumenti za mednarodni trg kmetijskih proizvodov;
(b) for that reason it is more suitable than other tools for an international market in agricultural produce,
c) je subvencioniranje zavarovalnih premij nedvomno v celoti sprejeta oblika pomoči znotraj STO,
(c) insurance premium subsidy is clearly an accepted form of aid within the WTO,
d) ima zavarovalni trg v teh zadevah veliko izkušenj, je že obravnaval težke situacije in lahko uporabi inovativne zavarovalne instrumente;
(d) the insurance market has vast experience in such matters, has already dealt with difficult situations, and it can use innovative insurance tools;
24. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije o zagotovitvi podpore vzajemnim skladom za delitev tveganja med proizvajalci; v zvezi s tem opozarja na velik pomen organizacij proizvajalcev, ki glede na razpršenost tveganja in povezovanje interesov napram trgom kapitala in zasebnemu zavarovalnemu sektorju lahko dosežejo bolj učinkovito zavarovalno kritje;
Welcomes the Commission’s suggestion that support could be provided for mutual funds for sharing producer risk; points, in this connection, to the major importance of producer organisations, which, through risk spreading and pooling of interests vis-à-vis capital markets and the private insurance sector, are able to provide more effective insurance cover;
26. poziva Komisijo, da preveri možnosti zavarovanja kmetov pred tveganjem zaradi padca cen s terminskimi blagovnimi posli in zajamčenimi cenami, pred izgubo količine pridelka pa z zasebnimi zavarovanji;
Calls on the Commission to explore the possibilities for protecting farmers against the risk of collapses in prices by means of commodity futures transactions and hedging and against the risk of volume losses by means of private insurance;
UL C 223, 8.8.2001, str.
OJ C 223, 8.8.2001, p.
Možnost 3: Splošna podpora v primeru dohodkovne krize
Option 3: Providing basic coverage against income crises
Obvladovanje tveganj in kriz v kmetijstvu
Risk and crisis management in the agricultural sector
o izvajanju gozdarske strategije Evropske unije
on the implementation of a European Union forestry strategy
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................16
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY 18
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 30. januarja 1997 o strategiji Skupnosti za gozdarski sektor
– having regard to its resolution of 30 January 1997 on the European Union's forestry strategy
UL C 55, 24.2.1997, str.
OJ C 55, 24.2.1997, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 18. novembra 1998 o strategiji Evropske unije za gozdarstvo ( KOM(1998)0649 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 18 November 1998 on a forestry strategy for the European Union ( COM(1998)0649 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Sveta z dne 15. decembra 1998 o gozdarski strategiji Evropske unije
– having regard to the Council resolution of 15 December 1998 on a forestry strategy for the European Union
UL C 56, 26.2.1999, str.
OJ C 56, 26.2.1999, p.
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 14/2000 o SKP in okolju
– having regard to the Court of Auditors' Special Report No 14/2000 on greening the CAP
UL C 353, 8.12.2000, str.
OJ C 353, 8.12.2000, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu "Poročilo o izvajanju gozdarske strategije EU" ( KOM(2005)0084 ) in priloženega delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o ukrepih in dejavnostih, ki so bili izvedeni v okviru gozdarske strategije EU od 1999 do 2004,
– having regard to the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament on the implementation of the EU forestry strategy ( COM(2005)0084 ) and the attached staff working document on actions and activities implemented in the context of the EU forestry strategy in the period 1999-2004,
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 9/2004 "Gozdarski ukrepi v okviru politike razvoja podeželja"
– having regard to the Court of Auditors' Special Report No 9/2004 on forestry measures within rural development policy
UL C 67, 18.3.2005, str.
OJ C 67, 18.3.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju sklepov o akcijskem načrtu EU za gozdarstvo, ki jih je sprejel Svet za kmetijstvo in ribištvo na zasedanju v Bruslju 30. maja 2005,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Agriculture and Fisheries Council of 30 May 2005 on the EU forest action plan,
– ob upoštevanju študije z dne 21. junija 2005 o perspektivah za evropsko gozdarsko strategijo, ki je jo naročil njegov pristojni odbor, izdelala pa francoska državna gozdarska uprava (Office National des Forêts),
– having regard to the study of 21 June 2005, called for by its committee responsible and drawn up by the Office National des Forêts (ONF, France), entitled 'European Forestry Strategy: outlook',
– ob upoštevanju osnutka mnenja Odbora regij z dne 12. septembra 2005 z naslovom "Poročilo o izvajanju gozdarske strategije EU",
– having regard to the draft opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 12 September 2005 entitled 'Report on the implementation of the EU forestry strategy',
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega osnutka mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 4. avgusta 2005 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu - Poročilo o izvajanju gozdarske strategije EU",
– having regard to the preliminary draft opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 4 August 2005 on the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament - report on the implementation of the EU forestry strategy,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in mnenja Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0015/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0015/2005 ),
Glavni vidiki
Fundamental aspect s
A. ker izdelava akcijskega načrta EU za trajnostno upravljanje gozdov, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, ne postavlja pod vprašaj temeljnih načel gozdarske strategije EU, se pravi trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov ter ohranitve in krepitve večnamenske vloge gozdov tudi za biološko raznovrstnost in v njih živeče divjadi, na podlagi načela solidarnosti; ker gre pri gozdarski strategiji EU za dinamičen proces, ki je odprt za integracijo novih elementov; ker gre akcijski načrt EU razumeti kot dopolnilen instrument, ki omogoča boljše usklajevanje ciljev in ukrepov na različnih akcijskih področjih,
A. whereas the fundamental principles of the EU forestry strategy, i.e. sustainable forest management and preserving and strengthening the multifunctional role played by forests and by the wildlife that live there, including their contribution to biodiversity, on the basis of the subsidiarity principle, are not being called into question by the drafting of the 'EU Action Plan for Sustainable Forest Management' proposed by the Commission; whereas EU forestry strategy is a dynamic process open to the integration of fresh elements; whereas the EU action plan should be seen as a complementary instrument which will help ensure better coordination between the objectives and measures in the various fields of action,
B. opozarja, da združitev gospodarske rasti s pomembnima okoljskimi vrednotama, na primer ohranjanjem varovalne funkcije in biološke raznovrstnosti gozdov, ter razvojem podeželja, bistveno prispeva k doseganju številnih ciljev lizbonske in göteborške strategije;
B. whereas, when it combines economic growth with important environmental values , such as sustaining the protective functions and biodiversity of forests, and rural development, forestry makes a particularly clear contribution to the attainment of several of the Lisbon and Göteborg objectives,
C. ker je vpliv najrazličnejših politik Skupnosti na gozdove vedno večji, čeprav niti v Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske unije niti v osnutku ustavne pogodbe ni predvidene pravne podlage za skupno gozdarsko politiko,
C. whereas, even though neither the Treaty on European Union nor the draft treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe provide a legal basis for a common forestry policy, there is a wide range of Community policies which have since gained a constantly growing influence on forests,
D. ker države članice uporabljajo deloma zelo različne opredelitve gozdov, zaradi česar je mogoča le nepopolna ocena ukrepov Skupnosti, pomembnih za gozdove,
D. whereas in some cases the Member States use widely differing definitions of forests, which means that it is only partially possible to assess Community measures relevant to forests,
E. ugotavlja, da je treba pri vseh odločitvah, ki zadevajo evropske gozdove, upoštevati dejstvo, da so evropski gozdovi zelo različne kakovosti in izpostavljeni različnim okoljskim izzivom,
E. whereas the basic perspective for all decision-making affecting European forests must be that European forests differ substantially from each other and face different environmental challenges,
Strateški element 1: Dejavno sodelovanje pri mednarodnih procesih v zvezi z gozdarskim sektorjem
Strategy element 1: Active participation in international processes relevant to forestry
F. ker so države članice z dejavnim sodelovanjem pri vseh mednarodnih procesih v zvezi z gozdarskim sektorjem izpolnile poziv Sveta k oblikovanju evropske gozdarske strategije,
F. whereas the Member States have responded to the Council's call for a European forestry strategy by actively participating in all international processes related to the forest sector,
G. poudarja, da so neokrnjeni gozdni ekosistemi pomembni za ohranjanje biološke raznovrstnosti v skladu z obveznostmi iz mednarodnih sporazumov; ugotavlja, da primere takšnih obveznosti predstavljajo Konvencija o biološki raznovrstnosti (Rio, 1992) in cilj zaustavitve upadanja biološke raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 (zasedanji EU v Göteborgu, 2001 in Johannesburgu, 2002); ugotavlja, da je za uspešno izpolnitev teh obveznosti izjemno pomembno določiti dovolj območij za naravne rezervate, gozdnogojitvene postopke pa skupaj s krajinskim načrtovanjem prilagoditi biološkim pogojem;
G. stressing the importance of intact forest ecosystems with a view to preserving biodiversity in accordance with commitments under international agreements; noting that examples of such commitments include the Biodiversity Convention (Rio, 1992) and the goal of halting the decline in the number of species by 2010 (EU meetings in Göteborg, 2001; Johannesburg 2002); observing that, in order to successfully fulfil these commitments, it is of the greatest importance to earmark sufficient areas as nature reserves and to gear silvicultural methods, in conjunction with landscape planning, more fully to biological preconditions.
Strateški element 2: Izvajanje mednarodnih obveznosti v okviru nacionalnih gozdarskih programov
Strategy element 2: Implementation of national forestry programmes in order to comply with international commitments entered into
H. ker so nacionalni in podnacionalni gozdarski programi (NFP) centralen instrument za izvajanje ciljev gozdarske strategije EU in naj bi poskrbeli za soglasje in skladnost med nacionalnimi političnimi cilji in mednarodnimi obveznostmi,
H. whereas national and subnational forest programmes (NFPs) represent the key instrument for implementing the objectives of the EU forestry strategy and are designed to guarantee coordination and coherence between national political guidelines and international commitments,
Strateški element 3: Izboljšanje usklajenosti, komunikacije in sodelovanja na vseh političnih področjih, ki zadevajo gozdarski sektor
Strategy element 3: Improving coordination, communication and cooperation in all fields of policy of relevance to forestry
I. ker ostaja načelna potreba po večji usklajenosti, boljši komunikaciji ter tesnejšem sodelovanju na vseh političnih področjih Skupnosti, ki zadevajo gozdarski sektor (kmetijstvo, okolje, energija, raziskovanje, industrija, notranji trg, trgovina ter razvojna pomoč), ki je bila izpostavljena že leta 1998, nespremenjena,
J. whereas nothing has changed with regard to the fundamental need, already highlighted in 1998, for better coordination, communication and cooperation in all Community policy sectors which are relevant to the forestry sector (agricultural, environmental, energy, research, industry, internal market, trade and development policy) within the Commission, between the Commission and the Member States and among the Member States,
Strateški element 4: Spodbujanje trajnostnega gospodarjenja z gozdovi v okviru politike ohranjanja in razvoja podeželskih območij
Strategy element 4: Promoting sustainable forest management as part of policy on conserving and developing rural areas
J. ker je na ravni Skupnosti politika razvoja podeželja glavni instrument za izvajanje gozdarske strategije, kar se kaže tudi v dejstvu, da je bilo za gozdarske ukrepe v okviru politike razvoja podeželja med 2000 in 2006 zagotovljenih 4,8 milijarde EUR, od tega je bila polovica porabljena za pogozdovanje kmetijskih obdelovalnih površin, druga polovica pa za ostale gozdarske ukrepe,
K. whereas rural development policy is the main instrument for implementing the forestry strategy at Community level, which can also be seen from the fact that EUR 4.8 billion was made available for forestry measures in the context of rural development policy between 2000 and 2006, half of which was used for the afforestation of farmland and half for other forest management measures,
Strateški element 5: Zaščita gozdov v Evropi
Strategy element 5: Protecting Europe 's forests
K. ker mora biti gozdarstvo gospodarsko, ekološko, socialno in kulturno trajnostno opredeljeno in ker so varstvo gozdov, spremljanje škode na gozdovih, sanacija poškodovanih delov gozdov in zagotavljanje okoljske uspešnosti, zlasti uravnavanje vodnega cikla, pomembni sestavni deli trajnostnega gozdarstva; poglaviten cilj v zvezi z gozdovi je ohranitev njihovega zdravja in sposobnosti za preživetje, tako da se jih zavaruje pred gozdnimi požari ter onesnaževanjem zraka, pa tudi pred onesnaževanjem tal in voda ter pred ostalo škodo zaradi bolezni in škodljivcev, kakor tudi zaradi erozije,
L. whereas forest management must be economically, ecologically, socially and culturally sustainable and whereas protecting forests, monitoring forest health, restoring damaged forests and safeguarding the environmental benefits, in particular regulation of the water cycle, are key elements of sustainable forest management; whereas a key aim with regard to forests is preserving forest health and vitality by protecting them against forest fires and atmospheric pollution, as well as against soil and water pollution and other damage caused by disease, pests and erosion,
L. ker želi zagotoviti biološko raznovrstnost in zahteva, da se upravljanje in trajnostno izkoriščanje prostoživečih živali, ki naravno naseljujejo ta območja, izvaja s ciljem ohranjanja vrst in ob spoštovanju ravnovesja med staležem divjadi in lovom,
M. whereas the aim should be to guarantee biodiversity in forest areas and ensure the regulation and sustainable use of the wildlife which naturally colonises such habitats, so as to secure the long-term presence of such species, with due regard for the balance between forests and game,
M. ker so kljub temu v politiki za razvoj podeželja predvideni ukrepi za preprečevanje požarov nezadostni za kljubovanje gozdnim požarom, ki so glavni vzrok za propadanje gozdov Evropske unije in eden od razlogov za pospešeno dezertifikacijo v mnogih predelih Evrope, obžaluje premajhno usklajenost programov, ki se izvajajo na regionalni in nacionalni ravni; meni, da je treba z izdelavo strateških smernic Skupnosti pospešiti usklajevanje, da bi bili preventivni ukrepi, ki jih sprejemajo različni nacionalni in/ali lokalni organi oblasti, bolj povezani; poziva Komisijo, naj vsem regijam predlaga, da izdelajo celovito strategijo za boj proti požarom in sodelujejo z državami članicami; meni, da mora takšna strategija pokrivati odnos med kmetijskim in gozdarskim okoljem, tveganja na tem področju in preventivne ukrepe za obravnavo teh tveganj,
N. whereas, nevertheless, the fire-prevention measures provided for in rural development policy are proving insufficient to tackle the phenomenon of forest fires, which is the main cause of forest deterioration in the European Union and one of the reasons for the accelerated desertification affecting many European regions; also regretting the lack of coordination between programmes implemented at regional or national level, coordination of which should be stepped up by drawing up a set of strategic Community guidelines with a view to dovetailing the preventive measures taken by different national and/or local government authorities; whereas the Commission should recommend to each region that it draw up a comprehensive strategy to combat fires and that they work together with the Member States; whereas such a strategy must cover the relationship between agriculture and the forest environment, the risks in the area and the preventive measures to address these risks,