natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jasno je, da je nekaj teh prednostnih nalog tesno povezanih z ostalimi zunanjimi instrumenti.
Clearly, some of the priorities here are closely linked to the other external instruments.
Pojavljajo se vprašanja, kot na primer, kako se lahko izboljšata postopek in prilagodljivost, da se s tem poveča učinkovitost izvajanja programov; na kakšen način lahko EP zagotovi, da njegove zakonodajne pristojnosti ne bi bile omejevane in na kakšen način lahko igra strateško vlogo pri oblikovanju prednostnih nalog in dodeljevanju sredstev.
Questions arise such as how can procedures and flexibility be improved to enhance effective implementation of programmes; how can the EP ensure that its legislative powers are not eroded and how can it play a strategic role in the definition of priorities and allocation of funds.
Vzporedno s tem je potekala razprava o nekaterih predlogih o tem, ali bi bilo izvedljivo/ustrezno ustanoviti "evropsko fundacijo", verjetno po zgledu ameriške "Narodne ustanove za demokracijo".
In parallel, some proposals have been discussed as to whether it would be feasible/desirable to create a "European Foundation", possibly drawing inspiration from the US model of a "National Endowment for Democracy".
Domnevno bi takšna ustanova delovala neodvisno in ločeno od zakonodajnega instrumenta (uredbe), ki bi se jo naj sprejelo.
Presumably, such a foundation would operate independently and separately from the legal instrument (Regulation) to be adopted.
Seveda se postavlja vprašanje, kako bi takšna fundacija delovala in na kakšen način bi bila financirana.
There is therefore a question mark over how such a foundation would operate and be funded.
Čeprav naj ne bi prehitro sodili o vsebini tega vprašanja, se zdi pomembno, da se izpostavi nekaj vprašanj v zvezi s proračunom:
While not wishing to comment prematurely on the substance of the issue, it seems important to highlight some budgetary issues:
-Ali bi se takšno financiranje izvršilo iz splošnega proračuna EU?
- Would such funding be provided from the general budget of the EU?
-Ali bi bilo predpisano z novo uredbo?
- Would it be provisioned from the new Regulation?
-Če je temu tako, ali bi bilo lahko določeno na tak način z upoštevanjem pravil finančne uredbe?
- If so, could funding be earmarked in this way given the rules of the Financial Regulation?
-Kako bi to vplivalo na pogodbeno zavezano odgovornost Komisije do izvajanja proračuna?
-What would be the implications in terms of the Commission's treaty-bound responsibility for implementing the budget?
Kakšne so posledice v okviru postopka podeljevanja razrešnice za proračun EU?
- What are the implications in terms of the discharge procedure for the EU's budget?
-Na kakšen način je mogoče zagotoviti, da se Parlamentova vloga nadzora nad proračunom ne bi bila predmet pogajanj?
- How could it be ensured that the budgetary scrutiny role of Parliament would not be compromised?
-Ali bi splošna pravila za agencije veljala tudi za "fundacijo"?
-Would the general rules for Agencies apply to a "Foundation"?
Ali bi fundacija delovala kot "izvrševalni agent" proračunskih skladov EU?
Would the Foundation act as an "implementing agent" of EU budget funds?
Razpravljalo se je tudi o drugem, ločenem vprašanju za ustanovitev drugačne vrste fundacije s področja človekovih pravic.
Another, separarate, issue for the creation of a different type of "foundation" in the human rights field has also been discussed.
Tu naj bi se bolje uporabile izkušnje evropskih poslancev za misije spremljanja volitev, delegacij, parlamentarnih skupščin itd.
Here, the pool of experience of MEPs should be better utilised for electoral observation missions, delegations, parliamentary assemblies etc.
Pokazalo se bo, kako se bo ta pobuda razvijala in na kakšen način bodo upoštevane proračunske posledice.
It remains to be seen how this initiative will develop and how the budgetary implications would be taken into account.
Kateri konkretni ukrepi naj se uporabijo, da se znatno izboljša izvajanje ukrepov v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami v okviru obstoječih skladov, še posebej kar se tiče usklajevanja med ukrepi in donatorji?
What particular measures should be put in place to significantly improve the implementation of the human rights actions within the context of existing funds, especially as concerns coordination between actions and donors?
Ali je mogoče, da EIDHR nima opore v širši strategiji, ampak raje financira širok razpon posameznih projektov in zato nezadostna proračunska sredstva razporeja preveč na drobno?
Is it the case that the EIDHR is not really underpinned by an overarching strategy but, rather, funds a wide variety of individual projects thus spreading scarce budgetary resources too thinly?
Kako je mogoče potrebo po finančni odgovornosti združiti z jasno potrebo po manj birokratskih postopkih na tem področju, ki včasih vključuje financiranje demokratičnih organizacij/civilnih organizacij, ki niso priznane v svojih državah?
How can the need for financial accountability be married to the clear need for less bureaucratic procedures in this field, sometimes involving funding of democracy organisations/ civil society organisations that are not recognised in their respective countries?
Kako se lahko vpliv financiranja, namenjenega človekovim pravicam in demokraciji, izboljša v okviru novega večletnega finančnega okvira, s tem da zagotavlja boljše razmerje med izdatki in koristmi?
How can the impact of funding going to human rights and democracy be improved within the new multi-annual financial framework, ensuring a better cost/ benefit relationship?
Ali bi morali vztrajati pri ideji o evropski fundaciji?
Should the idea of a European Foundation be pursued?
Ali je združljiva s finančno uredbo, ki je sedaj v veljavi?
Is it compatible with the Financial Regulation now in place?
o predhodnem predlogu proračuna 2007 – prva analiza
on PDB 2007 - First analysis
"Najboljša stvar glede prihodnosti je, da se dogaja dan za dnem" – Abraham Lincoln
"The best thing about the future is that it only comes one day at a time" - Abraham Lincoln
Predhodni predlog proračuna (PPP), ki ga je Komisija sprejela 3. maja, je prvi proračun za večletni finančni okvir 2007–2013.
The Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) 2007, adopted by the Commission on 3 May, is the first for the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) 2007 - 2013.
PPP 2007 je predviden za EU 27, vključno z Romunijo in Bolgarijo.
The PDB 2007 is for an EU of 27, including Romania and Bulgaria.
Če bo pristop ene od dveh držav kandidatk odložen, bo treba predložiti pisni predlog spremembe.
If the accession of either of these two candidate countries is delayed, then an amending letter will need to be presented.
Ta delovni dokument vsebuje začetni povzetek glavnih sestavnih delov predloga Komisije.
This working document provides an initial summary of the main elements of the Commission's proposal.
Dokument se osredotoča na spremembe v načrtovani porabi med PPP 2007 in proračunom 2006 (P2006) ter novimi programi v večletnem finančnem okviru in PPP.
The document focuses on changes in planned spending between PDB 2007 and the 2006 budget (B2006), and new programmes in this MFF and PDB.
Ključni podatki po razdelkih večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013
Key figures by 2007 - 2013 Multi-annual Financial Framework Heading
Delovni dokument je oblikovan v skladu z novimi razdelki v proračunu za leto 2007.
The Working Document is organised according to the new headings in the 2007 Budget.
To so razdelki, dogovorjeni v večletnem finančnem okviru 2007–2013.
These are the headings agreed in the 2007 - 2013 MFF.
Razdelki so določeni v tabelah 1a in 1b spodaj.
The headings are set out in tables 1a and 1b below.
Novi razdelki se razlikujejo od razdelkov v prejšnji finančni perspektivi 2000–2006.
These new headings are different from the headings in the previous 2000 - 2006 Financial Perspective (FP).
To pogosto otežuje neposredno primerjavo podatkov iz PPP 2007 in P2006.
This often makes direct comparisons between the PDB 2007 and the B2006 figures difficult.
Poleg tega novi večletni finančni okvir (VFO) vključuje številne nove programe.
Further, the new MFF includes many new programmes.
Ti novi programi postanejo včasih "krovni" programi, ki krijejo porabo iz predhodno obstoječih programov.
These new programmes sometimes become "umbrella" programmes that cover spending under pre-existing programmes.
Kot v predhodnih proračunih je namen pristopa "načrtovanje proračuna po dejavnostih" splošen pregled stroškov politik.
As in previous budgets, the "Activity-based budgeting" (ABB) approach aims to offer a global view of the cost of the policies.
Proračunski naslovi, poglavja in vrstice so ključnega pomena za letni proračunski postopek.
The budget titles, chapters and lines are crucial for the annual budget procedure.
Vendar poraba za določeno proračunsko poglavje ali področje politike lahko obsega več razdelkov.
However, spending on a given budget chapter, or policy area, can also be spread across a number of Headings.
Povzetek zneskov iz PPP 2007 po razdelkih VFO
Summary of the 2007 PDB figures by MFF heading
(EU 27)
2007 (EU 27) commitments
sprememba v % glede na leto 2006 (EU 25)
% change on 2006 (EU 25)
zgornja meja iz VFO
MFF ceiling
3a Svoboda, varnost in pravica
3a Freedom, Security and Justice
6 Nadomestila
6 Compensation
Vir: dokumenti Evropske komisije o PPP 2007
Source: Based on data from the European Commission's PDB 2007 documents
Ker se kategorije prekrivajo, je treba pri obravnavi PPP paziti, da se primerjajo podobni elementi v različnih proračunskih letih ter v novih in starih programih.
As a result of these overlapping categories, care must be taken when examining the PDB that comparisons across years and between new and old programmes are "like with like".
Ta delovni dokument je namenjen le pregledu.
This working document only presents an overview.
Potrebno bo dodatno delo, da bi v celoti razložili povezave med PPP 2007, P2006 in novimi razdelki VFO.
Further work will be needed to explain fully the linkages between the PDB 2007, B2006, and the new MFF Headings.
Tabela 1a določa odobritve za prevzem obveznosti za leto 2007 glede na PPP.
Table 1a sets out the commitment appropriations budget for 2007 as per the PDB.
Skupni znesek znaša 126.824 milijonov EUR, kar je 4,6 % več v primerjavi s proračunom 2006, na podlagi ocene odobritev proračuna 2006, ki jo je pripravila Komisija, izražene glede na nove razdelke večletnega finančnega okvira.
The total stands at EUR 126 824 million, which is an increase of 4,6% on B2006, based on a Commission estimate of B2006 appropriations expressed in terms of the new MFF Headings.
Skupne prevzete obveznosti po podatkih Komisije znašajo 1,08 % BND EU.
According to Commission data, the commitments total is equivalent to 1,08% of EU GNI.
Priloga I novega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma (MIS), na podlagi katere je bilo 17. maja 2006 na plenarnem zasedanju sprejeto Bögejevo poročilo, določa zgornjo mejo odobritev za prevzem obveznosti v višini 1,10 % BND EU.
Annex I to the new Inter-Institutional Agreement (IIA), the Böge report on which was adopted in Plenary on 17 May 2006, sets a ceiling on commitment appropriations of 1,10% of EU GNI.
Komisija v PPP navaja, da razlika v okviru zgornjih meja VFO znaša 1.577 milijonov EUR.
The Commission states in the PDB that the margin remaining within the MFF ceilings is EUR 1 577 million.
Podatki o zneskih za razdelek 4 in razdelek 5 so v tabeli označeni z zvezdico (*), ker obstaja v vsakem primeru očitna nesorazmernost med obveznostmi, zgornjo mejo in rezervo.
The margin figures for Heading 4 and for Heading 5 are asterisked (*) in the table because there is an apparent disparity in each case between the commitments, the ceiling and the margin.
Rezerva za razdelek 4 ne upošteva odobritev v zvezi z rezervo za nujno pomoč v višini 234,5 milijonov, ki je predvidena zunaj VFO.
The margin for Heading 4 does not take into account the appropriations related to the Emergency Aid Reserve of 234,5 million, which is outside of the MFF.
Rezerva v okviru zgornje meje razdelka 5 vključuje tudi 76 milijonov EUR iz prispevkov uslužbencev za pokojninski sklad.
The margin under the heading 5 ceiling also includes EUR 76 million from staff contributions to the pension fund.
Tabela 1b – Pregled PPP 2007 – plačila (milijoni EUR)
Table 1b - Overview of PDB 2007 - payments (EUR million)
plačila 2007 (EU 27)
2007 payments (EU 27)
glede na leto 2006 (EU 25)
% change on 2006 (EU 25)
V tabeli 1b so navedena sredstva za plačila v PPP 2007.
Table 1b sets out the payments in the PDB 2007.
Celotni skupni znesek odobritev plačil znaša 116.418 milijonov EUR, 3,9 % več v primerjavi z letom 2006.
The overall total for payment appropriations is EUR 116 418 million, an increase of 3,9% compared to 2006.
To je 0,99 % BND EU.
This is 0,99% of EU GNI .
Priloga I MIS določa zgornjo mejo za odobritve za plačila v višini 1,06 % BND.
For payment appropriations, Annex I to the IIA sets a ceiling of 1,06% of EU GNI.
Zato je v okviru proračunskih sredstev za plačila na voljo znatna rezerva.
There is therefore considerable margin remaining within the payments budget.
Delovni dokument zdaj obsega: vplive novega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma na proračun 2007, splošne pripombe poročevalca, povzetek PPP po razdelkih VFO in zadnji del o horizontalnih zadevah, kot so agencije, pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi.
The working document now covers: the implications of the new inter-institutional agreement (IIA) for the 2007 Budget; the rapporteur's general comments; a summary of the PDB by MFF Heading; and a final section on horizontal issues, such as agencies, pilot projects and preparatory actions.
Posledice novega MIS za proračun 2007
The implications of the new IIA for the 2007 budget
MIS med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, podpisan 17. maja 2006, je temelj za urejen razvoj odhodkov EU v naslednjih letih.
The IIA between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on Budgetary Discipline and Sound Financial Management signed on 17 May 2006 paves the way for an orderly development of EU expenditure over the coming years.
Čeprav predvideva določene letne zgornje meje za obveznosti in plačila, VFO ni večletni proračun.
Although it foresees fixed annual ceilings for commitments and for payments, the MFF is not a multi-annual budget.
Treba je ohraniti zadostno rezervo, da se omogoči običajen razvoj letnega postopka.
Sufficient margin to allow the normal evolution of the annual procedure needs to be preserved.
Devetdeset odstotkov zakonodaje EU za programe porabe se zaključi konec leta 2006, vendar vsi prihodnji programi ne bodo določeni v letu 2007, zato je treba ohraniti prostor za nove pobude, letne ukrepe, pilotne projekte, pripravljalne ukrepe ter podporo prednostnim nalogam EP.
Ninety percent of EU legislation for spending programmes terminates at the end of 2006, but not all future programmes will be fixed in 2007, and room should be maintained for new initiatives, annual actions, pilot projects and preparatory actions, and for support to EP's priorities.
Večina postopkov soodločanja, s katerimi se vzpostavlja nova generacija programov, bo zaključena konec leta 2006 ali na začetku leta 2007; proračun 2007 bo še vedno zagotavljal priložnost za natančno uravnavanje in deloval kot vzvod EP za ohranitev prednostnih nalog v tekočih zakonodajnih postopkih.
Most co-decision procedures setting up the new generation of programmes will be finalised at the end of 2006 or in early 2007: the 2007 budget will still offer an opportunity for fine-tuning and serve as leverage for the EP to secure its priorities in the ongoing legislative procedures.
Številne določbe iz novega MIS se bodo izvajale med proračunskim postopkom 2007.
A number of provisions set up by the new IIA will be implemented in the course of the 2007 budgetary procedure.
Poročevalec meni, da bi se del rezerve lahko uporabil za ta namen, zlasti v okviru razdelkov 1A, 3B in 4.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that part of the margin could be used for that purpose, especially under headings 1A, 3B and 4.
Poročevalec želi poudariti, da so zneski, predvideni v PPP za večletne programe, okvirni, dokler zakonodajni organ ne zaključi postopkov.
The rapporteur wishes to point out that the amounts entered into the PDB for multi-annual programmes remain indicative until the legislative authority has completed the procedures.
Zato bi se lahko rezerve, nastale v različnih razdelkih, občutno spremenile po zaključku zakonodajnih postopkov.
Therefore, the resulting margins of the various headings could be significantly modified after completion of the legislative procedures.
Sklad bo imel neposreden vpliv na proračun 2007, kar zadeva uporabo rezerve, ki bo ostala na voljo po sprejetju proračuna in po uporabi sredstev sklada v okviru proračunskega postopka.
It will have a direct impact on the 2007 Budget concerning the use of the margin left available once the Budget is adopted and for the mobilisation of the Fund in the context of the budgetary procedure.
V zvezi z rezervami poročevalec meni, da bodo verjetno na voljo le pri odhodkih za kmetijstvo, t.j. v razdelku 1A do konca leta 2006 in razdelku 2 od leta 2007 naprej.
Concerning the margins available, the rapporteur considers that it will likely only be found within agriculture expenditure, i.e. heading 1A until 2006 and heading 2 from 2007 onwards.
V letnem postopku bo zagotovljeno pozorno spremljanje finančnega načrtovanja in, če bo potrebno, bodo sprejeti ukrepi na proračunski ravni.
A close follow-up of financial programming will be ensured over the annual procedure and conclusions could be drawn at budgetary level if necessary.
Komisija mora v skladu z MIS med proračunskim postopkom poročati proračunskemu organu o dejavnostih, ki jih financirajo EIB, Evropski investicijski sklad in EBOR za podporo naložbam v raziskave in razvoj, vseevropska omrežja in MSP.
According to the IIA, during the budgetary procedure, the Commission should report to the budgetary authority on activities financed by the EIB/ EIF and the EBRD to support investment in Research and Development, TENs and SMEs;
Splošne pripombe poročevalca
Rapporteur's general comments
Poročevalec želi opozoriti, da se mora razprava o P2007 osredotočiti na tri področja: opredelitev političnih prednostnih nalog v zunanjih in notranjih politikah, najboljša uporaba sredstev z vidika kakovosti, ki jo spremlja raziskava o stroških in koristih ter priprava na pregled 2008–2009, kot določa delovni dokument 2 (odstavek 8) in kot je potrdila plenarna skupščina ( A6-0154/2006 ) 18. maja 2006.
The rapporteur wishes to recall, as set out in Working Document 2 (para 8) and endorsed by the plenary ( A6-0154/2006 ) on 18 May 2006, that the debate on B2007 should focus on three strands: setting of policy priorities in external and internal policies; ensuring qualitative value for money accompanied by cost-benefit studies; and preparing for the review in 2008/2009.
Poročevalec je poleg tega odločen uporabiti vse možnosti, ki jih nudita letni proračunski postopek in novi MIS, kakor tudi začeti pripravo na vmesni pregled 2008–2009.
The rapporteur is further determined to use all of the possibilities offered by the annual budgetary procedure and by the new IIA to prepare for the 2008-2009 mid-term review.
V zvezi s skupnimi zneski poročevalec ugotavlja, da je v skladu z določbami medinstitucionalnega sporazuma (člen 16) letna tehnična prilagoditev za celotno obdobje določena na podlagi deflatorja v višini dveh odstotkov letno.
On the overall figures, the rapporteur notes that, according to the provisions laid down by the IIA (article 16), the annual technical adjustment is fixed for the whole period on a deflator rate of 2% a year.
Komisija je PPP priložila predstavitev novega VFO v tekočih cenah.
The Commission has annexed to the PDB a presentation of the new MFF at current prices.
V skladu z zgornjimi mejami, določenimi v VFO, bo raven porabe EU, izražena v obveznostih, stalno naraščala v VFO.
In line with the ceilings fixed by the MFF, the profile of EU expenditure is set to increase in a consistent manner across the MFF for commitments.
Za raven plačil so značilne večje nepravilnosti, zlasti glede kohezijske politike, ki doseže vrh leta 2008.
However, the profile is far more irregular concerning payments, especially for cohesion policy , with a peak in 2008.
Poročevalec poudarja, da nižja raven plačil v določenem proračunskem letu lahko vodi do odloga pri izvajanju.
The rapporteur stresses that a lower level of payments in a given budget year may lead to delays in implementation.
Iz analize zneskov po razdelkih v PPP 2007 (tabeli 1a in 1b), ki zadevajo politične prednostne naloge, poudarjene v njegovem delovnem dokumentu št. 2 (odstavek 9), poročevalec ugotavlja, da se zdijo odobritve v nekaterih razdelkih premajhne in mogoče nezadostne.
Focusing on the figures per heading in PDB 2007 (tables 1a and 1b), and relative to the policy priorities highlighted in his Working Document 2 (para 9), the rapporteur notes that there are some headings under which foreseen appropriations seem low and perhaps insufficient.
Poročevalec ugotavlja 14,8-odstotno povečanje sredstev za kohezijo za rast in zaposlovanje (razdelki 1B) in pozdravlja 11,5-odstotno povečanje sredstev za konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje (razdelek 1a), glede na to, da je lizbonska strategija bila prednostna naloga, poudarjena v delovnem dokumentu 2.
The rapporteur notes the 14,8 % increase in appropriations on cohesion for growth and employment (heading 1B) and welcomes the 11,5% increase in appropriations for competitiveness for growth and employment (heading 1a), as the Lisbon Agenda was a priority underlined in Working Document 2.
Vendar je poročevalec zaskrbljen zaradi 20,2-odstotnega znižanja odobritev v razdelku 4 (EU kot globalni partner).
However, the rapporteur is concerned by the 20,2% decrease in appropriations under Heading 4 (the EU as a global partner).
Nadalje ugotavlja, da je bilo malo sredstev preusmerjenih v reševanje izzivov, opisanih v njegovem delovnem dokumentu 4.
He further notes that there appears to be little re-direction of funds towards tackling the challenges outlined in his Working Document 4.
Tudi varnost in potreba po učinkovitejši komunikacijski politiki sta bili prednostni nalogi v delovnem dokumentu št. 2; za ta področja porabe niso značilne večje spremembe glede skupne porabe v PPP 2007 v primerjavi s P2006.
The security dimension and the need for a more efficient communications policy were also priorities in Working Document 2: these areas of spending do not see major changes in overall spending in the PDB 2007 relative to B 2006.
Poročevalcu se zdijo rezerve, ki so na voljo v različnih razdelkih, že nezadostne, zlasti v razdelkih 3B in 4, za izpolnjevanje ambicij Unije na teh področjih.
In the rapporteur's view, the margins left under the different headings already appear to be insufficient, especially for heading 3B and 4, to face the ambition of the Union in those areas.
Komisija je predstavila PPP na osnovi EU s 27-imi državami v skladu z naslednjim VFO, čeprav še ni bila sprejeta formalna odločitev o priključitvi Bolgarije in Romunije.
The Commission has presented the PDB based on an EU with 27 countries in line with the next MFF, no formal decision on enlargement to Bulgaria and Romania has yet been taken.
Poročevalec meni, da se v proračunu ne smejo predvidevati politične odločitve, ampak morajo v njem biti potrjene.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that the budget should not anticipate political decisions but rather endorse them.
Zato mora Komisija ločeno navesti odhodke, predvidene za EU-2, da se ohranijo pravice proračunskega organa v okviru pisnega predloga spremembe, ki ga bo Komisija predstavila, če bo širitev izvedena pred drugo obravnavo Parlamenta.
Therefore, the Commission should indicate separately the expenditure foreseen for EU-2 in order to preserve the rights of the budgetary authority in the context of an Amending Letter to be presented by the Commission if enlargement becomes effective before Parliament's second reading.
Razdelek 1a – Konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje
Heading 1a - Competitiveness for growth and employment