natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
a) država, ki je zadevnemu letalskemu prevozniku podelila uporabno dovoljenje, dala dovoljenje; in
a) authorisation has been given by the State granting the operating licence to the air carrier concerned; and
b) so država odhoda in država prihoda ter, kjer je primerno, vsaka država, ki jo zrakoplov preleti ali v kateri so vmesne postaje, dale predhodno odobritev;
b) prior approval has been given by the States of departure and arrival and, where applicable, by any State which is flown over or in which intermediate stops are made;
Priloga, poglavje 10, odstavek 6
Annex, chapter 10, paragraph 6
Odstavki 1 do 5 se uporabljajo samo za letalske prevoznike Skupnosti.
Paragraphs 1 to 5 shall apply only to Community air carriers
Odstavki 1 do 5 se uporabljajo za letalske prevoznike Skupnosti in prevoznike, katerih glavni kraj poslovanja je v eni ali več državah članicah .
Paragraphs 1 to 5 shall apply to Community air carriers and to carriers that have their principal place of business in one or more Member States.
Za letalske prevoznike držav, ki niso članice EU, in katerih glavni kraj poslovanja je znotraj EU, veljajo enaka pravila kot za letalske prevoznike Skupnosti.
Carriers from non-EU countries that have their principal place of business in the Community should follow the same rules as Community carriers.
Priloga, poglavje 10, odstavek 6 a (novo)
Annex, chapter 10, paragraph 6 a (new)
Treba je jasno opredeliti odgovornosti za ustrezno ukrepanje v primeru, ko na civilnem zrakoplovu ali med letom pride do kakršnega koli dejanja nezakonitega vmešavanja, brez poseganja v načelo avtoritete kapitana zrakoplova.
Responsibilities for taking appropriate action in the event of any act of unlawful interference committed on board a civil aircraft or during a flight shall be clearly defined, without prejudice to the principle of the authority of the captain of the aircraft.
Kapitan nosi končno odgovornost za zrakoplov.
The Captain bears the final responsibility for his aircraft.
Treba mu je priznati avtoriteto za varnost med letom.
His authority in matters of in-flight security should be recognised.
Priloga, poglavje 11, odstavek 1
Annex, chapter 11, paragraph 1
Osebe, ki izvajajo, ali ki so pristojne za izvajanje pregledov, nadzor dostopa ali drugih varnostnih ukrepov, se zaposlijo, usposabljajo in potrdijo zaradi zagotovitve, da so primerne za zaposlitev in usposobljene za izvajanje dodeljenih nalog.
Persons implementing or responsible for implementing, screening, access control or other security controls shall be recruited, trained and certified so as to ensure that they are suitable for employment and competent to undertake the duties to which they will be assigned.
Osebe, ki izvajajo ali so pristojne za izvajanje pregledov, nadzor dostopa ali drugih varnostnih ukrepov, se zaposlijo, usposabljajo in po potrebi potrdijo zaradi zagotovitve, da so primerne za zaposlitev in usposobljene za izvajanje dodeljenih nalog.
Persons implementing, or responsible for implementing, screening, access control or other security controls shall be recruited, trained and , where appropriate, certified so as to ensure that they are suitable for employment and competent to undertake the duties to which they will be assigned.
Priloga, poglavje 11, odstavek 2
Annex, chapter 11, paragraph 2
Osebe, razen potnikov, ki morajo imeti dostop na varnostna območja omejenega gibanja, se pred izdajo letališke dovolilnice ali dovolilnice posadke usposabljajo na področju varnosti.
Persons other than passengers requiring access to security restricted areas shall, before either an airport identification card or crew identification card is issued, receive security training.
Osebe, razen potnikov, in osebe s spremstvom s kratkotrajno letališko prepustnico, ki morajo imeti dostop na varnostna območja omejenega gibanja, se pred izdajo letališke dovolilnice ali dovolilnice posadke usposabljajo na področju varnosti, razen če so neprestano v spremstvu ene ali več oseb z letališko dovolilnico ali dovolilnico posadke .
Persons other than passengers and escorted persons with a short term airport pass requiring access to security restricted areas shall, before either an airport identification card or crew identification card is issued, receive security training unless they are continuously escorted by one or more persons that have an airport identification card or crew identification card .
Priloga, poglavje 12
Annex, chapter 12
Oprema, ki se uporablja za preglede, nadzor dostopa in druge varnostne ukrepe, mora imeti zmogljivost za opravljanje zadevnih varnostnih ukrepov.
Equipment used for screening, access control and other security controls shall be capable to perform the security controls concerned .
Oprema, ki se uporablja za preglede, nadzor dostopa in druge varnostne ukrepe, mora biti v skladu s specifikacijami in imeti zmogljivost za opravljanje zadevnih varnostnih ukrepov.
Equipment used for screening, access control and other security controls shall comply with approved specification and be capable of performing the security controls concerned.
Na tem področju je nujna zahteva v zvezi z izdajanjem spričeval.
There needs to be a certification requirement in this area.
Priloga, poglavje 12 a (novo)
Annex, chapter 12 a (new)
PREVERJANJE PRETEKLOSTI
BACKGROUND CHECKS
Vsem pilotom in kandidatom za pridobitev dovoljenja za pilota zrakoplova na motorni pogon se preteklost preverja na enak način in v rednih časovnih presledkih.
All pilots and applicants for pilot licences for motorised aircraft shall be subject to uniform background checks which shall be repeated at regular intervals.
Pristojne oblasti se pri preverjanju preteklosti odločajo na podlagi enakih kriterijev.
Decisions of the appropriate authorities regarding background checks shall be taken on the basis of the same criteria.
Za doseganje visoke stopnje, ki bi bila enotna za celotno Skupnost, je treba določiti enotne standarde preverjanj.
In order to achieve a uniformly high level across the Community, uniform standards should be laid down as a basis for these checks.
Obstoječa uredba 2320/2002 je bila pripravljena in sprejeta takoj po terorističnem napadu v Združenih državah 11. septembra 2001.
The existing Regulation, 2320/2002, was drafted and adopted in the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attack in the United States on 11 September 2001.
Sprejeta je bila po tesnem in hitrem sodelovanju Parlamenta in Sveta za zapolnitev zaznane vrzeli v evropski letalski varnosti.
It was adopted after Parliament and the Council had worked closely and speedily to close a perceived gap in Europe's aviation security.
V tem času je bilo priznano, da bo treba zakonodajo ponovno obravnavati glede na njeno izvajanje in pri tem pridobljene izkušnje.
There was an acknowledgement at the time that the legislation might have to be revisited in the light of its implementation and the experiences gained from that.
Predlog, ki ga je Komisija zdaj predložila, mora nadomestiti obstoječo uredbo s tem, kar je dejansko okvirna uredba.
The proposal now brought forward by the Commission is to replace the existing Regulation by what is in effect a framework regulation.
Po njegovem sprejetju so bile tehnične zahteve v Uredbi 2320/2002 ob mnogih priložnostih prek komitologije spremenjene.
Since its adoption the technical specifications in Regulation 2320/2002 have been amended on many occasions through comitology.
To je naslednji argument v korist pristopa okvirne uredbe.
This is a further argument in favour of the framework regulation approach.
Uredba 2320/2002 je bila sprejeta decembra 2002 po tretji obravnavi in spravnem postopku.
Regulation 2320/2002 was adopted in December 2002 after Third Reading and conciliation.
V času Uredbe 2320/2002 je bilo odprto vprašanje za Evropski parlament financiranje predlaganih varnostnih ukrepov.
An outstanding issue at the time of Regulation 2320/2002 for the European Parliament was the funding of the security measures proposed.
Sedanji predlog
The current proposal
Glavni osnovni namen sedanjega predloga je odstraniti podrobne tehnične zahteve iz Uredbe in njene priloge ter jih umestiti v vrsto ukrepov za izvajanje, ki jih Komisija lahko sprejme.
The major underlying intention of the current proposal is to remove detailed technical specifications from the Regulation and its annexe and to place them in a series of implementing measures which the Commission may adopt.
Razloga za to sta odstranitev informacij iz javne uporabe, ki bi jih lahko uporabili teroristi, ter omogočanje lažje in hitrejše posodobitve tehničnih zahtev prek komitologije.
The reasons for this are to remove from the public domain information which may be of use to terrorists and to allow an easier and speedier updating of technical requirements through comitology.
Predlagana je uporaba regulativnega postopka, ki zahteva veliko večino predstavnikov držav članic v regulativnem odboru, preden je predlog Komisije sprejet.
It is proposed to use the regulatory procedure which requires a weighted majority of Member States representatives in a regulatory committee in favour before a Commission proposal to be adopted.
V skladu s tem postopkom lahko Parlament obvesti Svet, če meni, da je Komisija presegla svoja pooblastila.
Under this procedure the Parliament can inform the Council if it believes the Commission is exceeding its powers.
Sprejeti ukrepi bodo „tajni podatki EU“, ki bodo na voljo le upravljavcem in subjektom z legitimnim interesom.
The measures adopted will be "EU classified information" available only to operators and entities with a legitimate interest.
Nadaljnji in s tem povezan cilj spremembe Uredbe je zagotoviti osnovo enotne razlage Priloge 17 o varnosti po Čikaški konvenciji o mednarodnem civilnem letalstvu.
A further and related aim of the amending Regulation is to provide a basis for a common interpretation of annex 17 on security to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.
Osnutek Uredbe obravnava tudi vsebinska vprašanja, ki jih obstoječa uredba ne zajema.
The draft Regulation also deals with substantive matters the existing Regulation does not cover.
Zakon prvič obravnava ukrepe, ki jih je treba uporabiti v zrakoplovu med letom.
For the first time the act deals with measures to apply on board an aircraft during flight.
Ti vključujejo uradnike, zadolžene za varnost med letom, ter prepoved nošenja orožja, razen če so bili izpolnjeni nekateri varnostni pogoji (oddelek 10 Priloge).
These include authorisation of in flight security officers and prohibition on carrying weapons unless certain security conditions have been met (Annex, section10).
Po eni strani predlog omogoča državam uporabiti strožje ukrepe od tistih iz Uredbe, na podlagi ocene tveganja in drugih dovoljenj odstopanja, ki temeljijo na velikosti letala in pogostosti storitev na letališčih.
The proposal allows, on the one hand, Member States to apply more stringent measures than those specified in the Regulation on the basis of risk assessment and on the other permits derogations based on the size of aircraft and the frequency of operations at airports.
Cilj „enkratnega varnostnega pregleda“ predlagajo določbe osnutka Uredbe o izvzetju transfernih potnikov in prtljage iz pregledov pod določenimi pogoji, vključno kadar tretje države ustrezajo standardom Skupnosti.
The aim of "one-stop security" is advanced by the draft Regulation's provisions on exempting transfer passengers and baggage from screening under certain conditions including where third countries meet Community standards.
Določene so tudi določbe za uporabo standardov tretjih držav, kadar jih med drugim zahteva prelet.
It also establishes provisions for the application of third country standards where those are required for, inter alia, overflight.
Končno od držav članic zahteva, da pripravijo načrte varnosti civilnega letalstva ter nosilcem dejavnosti in prevoznikom priskrbijo programe varnosti in mehanizme za Komisijo za spremljanje skladnosti z Uredbo.
Finally it requires Member States to draw up civil aviation security plans and operators and carriers to have security programmes and mechanisms for the Commission to monitor compliance with the Regulation.
Vseeno obstajajo vprašanja, ki jih sprememba Uredbe ne obravnava, vendar jih je treba upoštevati.
However there are issues which the amending Regulation does not address but must be considered.
Vprašanje stroškov za varnost in njihove porazdelitve se ne obravnava.
The issue of costs for security and the apportionment of these is not dealt with.
Prav tako ni pojasnjeno, kako bo industrija vključena v posvetovalni postopek o posebnih varnostnih ukrepih.
Nor is it made clear how the industry will be involved in the consultation process on specific security measures.
Ravnotežje med Uredbo in izvedbenimi ukrepi
Balance between the Regulation and implementing measures
Pomembno vprašanje je vzpostavitev ravnovesja med tem, kar je treba sprejeti v okvirni Uredbi in njeni prilogi, ter tem, kar je treba obravnavati z izvedbenimi ukrepi, sprejetimi s postopkom komitologije.
A major consideration is to strike the right balance between what should be adopted in the framework Regulation and its annexe and what should be dealt with by way of implementing measures adopted by the comitology procedure.
To bo v ospredju preučevanja posebnih vidikov predloga poročevalca.
This will be to the forefront of your Rapporteur's mind when particular aspects of the proposal are examined.
Pravično bi bilo, da Uredba vključuje vse, razen tehničnih standardov, ki so predmet občasnega prilagajanja in se iz varnostnih razlogov ne pojavljajo v javni uporabi.
It would seem right to have everything in the Regulation except for technical standards which are subject to periodic adjustment and which for security reasons should not appear in the public domain.
Stroški in kdo plača?
Costs and who pays?
To ni novo vprašanje v zvezi s stroški letalske varnosti.
This is not a new question in respect of aviation security costs.
Uredbi 2320/2003, ki jo sedanji predlog spreminja, je bila priložena medinstitucionalna izjava, v kateri Parlament, Svet in Komisija priznavajo, da je bilo treba vprašanje financiranja nujno preučiti.
Regulation 2320/2003 which the current proposal amends was accompanied by an Interinstitutional Declaration in which the Parliament, Council and Commission recognised that the funding question had to be analysed urgently.
Zato je z razočaranjem ugotovljeno, da osnutek spremembe Uredbe tega vprašanja ne obravnava.
It is therefore disappointing to see that the draft amending Regulation does not address this issue.
Ne le, da Komisija ne predloži nobenega predloga v zvezi s financiranjem, ampak tudi ne predloži ocene stroškov ukrepov, ki jih predlaga za letališča in letalske prevoznike.
Not only does it make no proposal in respect of funding, the Commission does not present an estimate of the costs to airports and airlines of the measures it proposes.
Prav tako obstaja možnost učinka izkrivljanja in tržne prednosti nekaterih upravljavcev, kadar so stroški v različnih državah članicah različno porazdeljeni.
It is also the case that, where costs are apportioned differently in different Member States, there is a possibility of a distortion effect and trade advantage to some operators.
Prav tako se lahko sklepa, da je odgovornost države za varnost državljanov na letališčih ali med letom prav tolikšna kot na kateri koli drugi točki prihoda s potovanj, na primer na železniški ali avtobusni postaji.
It could well be argued that the security of the citizen at airports or in the air is the state's responsibility just as much as at it is at any other point of travel departure, for example a railway or bus station
Poročevalec prav tako ugotavlja, da člen 5 osnutka Uredbe državam članicam omogoča uporabiti strožje varnostne ukrepe od skupnih standardov, ki jih zahteva ta uredba.
Your rapporteur also notes that Article 5 of the draft Regulation permits Member States to apply more stringent security measures than the common standards required by the Regulation.
Kadar bodo te ukrepe zahtevale nacionalne uprave, bodo povzročili povečane stroške za letališča in letalske prevoznike.
These, when required by national administrations, will entail increased costs for airports and airlines.
Obstaja možnost, da vsaj te dodatne stroške, ki so povezani z nestandardnimi stroški, pokrivajo države članice.
There is a case for at least these additional costs related to non standard measures to be met by the Member State.
Kakšno vlogo imajo zainteresirane strani?
What role for stakeholders?
Predlog za sprejetje izvedbenih ukrepov s predstavniki Regulativnega odbora držav članic, ki mu predseduje Komisija, je smiseln sam po sebi.
The proposal to adopt implementing measures using a Regulatory committee of Member States representatives, chaired by the Commission, is in itself reasonable.
Vseeno bo pomembno zagotovi učinkovit mehanizem, ki osebam v industriji z vsakodnevnimi obveznostmi za izvajanje odločb, ki jih sprejme Regulativni odbor, omogoča posvetovanje s tem odborom.
Nevertheless it will be important to ensure that an effective mechanism exists to allow those in the industry with day to day responsibility for implementing the decisions made by the Regulatory committee to advise that committee.
Zato mora Uredba priznati vlogo svetovalne interesne skupine za varnost letalstva, ki že obstaja in se posvetuje s Komisijo.
It is for this reason that the role of the Stakeholder Advisory Group on Aviation Security, which already exists and is consulted by the Commission, should be recognised by the Regulation.
Varnostni ukrepi med letom
In-Flight Security measures
Obstoječa uredba ne obravnava varnostnih ukrepov med letom.
The existing Regulation does not deal with in-flight security measures.
Obstajajo nekatera tveganja prekrivanja z drugimi ureditvami, določenimi na mednarodni ravni.
There is some risk of overlap with other arrangements determined at international level.
Ukrepi za preprečevanje nedovoljenega vstopa v kabino letalske posadke so na primer zajeti v določbah ICAO.
Measures to prevent unauthorised access to the flight crew compartment, for example, are covered by ICAO provisions.
Uredba ne predvideva uradnikov na letalu, zadolženih za varnost med letom, in Komisija priznava, da je to zlasti področje za države članice.
The Regulation would not require in flight security officers on board aircraft and the Commission recognises that this is an area primarily for the Member States.
Vključitev uradnikov, zadolženih za varnost, v del 10 Priloge verjetno pomeni uporabo skupnih pravil in standardov, če in kadar je to potrebno, s postopkom komitologije.
The inclusion on in-flight security officers at part 10 of the annexe seems to be to allow common rules and standards to be applied if and when this is necessary through using the comitology procedure.
Tretje države in „enkratni varnostni pregled“
Third countries and "one stop" security
Učinek člena 6 je zagotovitev, da so varnostni ukrepi, ki jih zahtevajo tretje članice, predmet preučevanja in soglasja z Regulativnim odborom.
The effect of Article 6 is to ensure that security measures required by third countries are subject to scrutiny and agreement by the Regulatory committee.
Obstaja tudi določba iz člena 17 za sporazume o varnostnih ukrepih, ki jih je treba skleniti med tretjimi državami in Komisijo.
There is also provision at Article 17 for agreements to be concluded between third countries and the Commission on security standards.
To bo olajšalo neprekinjen transfer potnikov in blaga, kadar so takšni dogovori doseženi.
This will facilitate uninterrupted transfer of passengers and goods where such agreements are reached.
Vseeno je treba paziti na to, da se sčasoma izognemo slabitvi varnostnih ukrepov, pod pritiskom, da se zmanjšajo stroški in zagotovi nemoten transfer potnikov.
However care has to be taken to avoid a dilution in security standards over time under pressure to reduce costs and smooth passenger transfer.
Poročevalec na splošno podpira osnutek Uredbe in priznava potrebo po nadomestitvi Uredbe 2320/2002 ob upoštevanju pridobljenih izkušenj po njenem začetku veljave.
Your rapporteur supports the draft Regulation in general terms and recognises the need to replace Regulation 2320/2002 in the light of experience gained since it came into force.
Prav tako priznava, da je okvirna Uredba s podrobnostmi o takšni metodi preučevanja in izvedbenih merilih opreme, ki se obravnavajo pri izvedbenih ukrepih, pravi pristop.
He also recognises that a framework Regulation with details such as screening methods and equipment performance criteria dealt with in implementing measures is the right approach.
Vseeno pa, kot je bilo navedeno zgoraj, ostaja več področij, kjer se lahko zahteva večja jasnost ali spremembe predloga.
However, as indicated above there remain a number of areas where greater clarity or changes to the proposal may be required.
Zato na tej točki predlaga več predlogov sprememb.
It is for that reason that he is putting forward a number of amendments at this point.
Nekateri od teh obravnavajo zgoraj izpostavljene točke, medtem ko je namen ostalih zaostritev zakonodaje na določenih področjih.
Some of those deal with the points raised above while others aim to tighten the legislation in particular areas.
Pri predlaganju teh predlogov sprememb si poročevalec prizadeva vzpostaviti ravnovesje med potrebo po pregledu in nadzoru ter potrebo po hitri, nejavni prilagoditvi nekaterih tehničnih standardov in postopkov; temeljitejšo določbo za sodelovanje interesnih skupin; in pravičnejšo ureditev porazdelitve stroškov.
In putting forward these amendments your rapporteur seeks to strike a balance between the need for scrutiny and control and the need for speedy , non public adaptation of certain technical standards and procedures; a better founded provision for stakeholder participation; and a more equitable arrangement on the distribution of costs.
Sicer pa na splošno pozdravlja osnutek Uredbe.
In general however he welcomes the draft Regulation.
Zagotoviti varnost oseb in blaga znotraj njenih meja je eden od najnujnejših večjih izzivov, s katerim se sooča Evropska unija: v civilnem letalstvu ta nujnost narekuje izvajanje politike, ki bo sposobna preprečiti dejanja nezakonitega vmešavanja v civilna letala in/ali območja letališč, in sicer z vzpostavitvijo minimalnih skupnih pravil in standardov, pa tudi mehanizmov nadzora nad njihovo uporabo.
One of the most immediate major challenges the European Union has to face is that of guaranteeing the safety of people and property within its frontiers: seen in terms of civil aviation, this task calls for the implementation of policies capable of forestalling unlawful actions targeting civil aircraft and/or airport zones by establishing minimum common rules and standards, and mechanisms to enforce them.
Zadnja veljavna uredba na tem področju ((ES) št. 2320/2002) je bila sprejeta 16. decembra 2002 po dogodkih v zvezi z 11. septembrom 2001 v Združenih državah Amerike.
The most recent regulation in force on the subject ((EC) No 2320/2002) was adopted on 16 December 2002 in the wake of the events of 11 September 2001 in the United States.
Glede na izkušnje, pridobljene po tem, je treba njeno vsebino revidirati in uredbo nadomestiti z novo verzijo, ki bo bolj preprosta, usklajena in jasna, kar naj bi učinkovito zvišalo raven varnosti.
In the light of experience gained since then, its content needs to be reviewed and the regulation replaced with a new version designed to give greater simplicity, harmonisation and clarity, all in the service of a higher level of security in practice.