natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sklenitev skupne izjave o praktičnih ukrepih za postopek soodločanja
Conclusion of the Joint Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure
o spremembah poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta za prilagoditev notranjih postopkov zahtevam po poenostavitvi zakonodaje Skupnosti
on changes to be made to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure to bring internal procedures into line with the requirements of simplification of Community legislation
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe k poslovniku ( B6‑0582/2005 ),
– having regard to the proposal for amendment of its Rules of Procedure B6‑0582/2005 ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom „Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: Strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja ( KOM(2005)0535 )",
– having regard to the Communication of the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: A strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’ (COM(2005) 0535),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta 15. in 16. junija 2006, zlasti točke 41,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 15 and 16 June 2006, particularly paragraph 41 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o strategiji poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment,
Sprejeta besedila s tem datumom, P6_TA(2006)0205 . ,
Texts adopted on that date, P6_TA(2006)0205 .
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o rezultatih preverjanja zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo zakonodajalca
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the legislator,
Sprejeta besedila s tem datumom, P6_TA(2006)0206 . ,
Texts adopted on that date, P6_TA(2006)0206 .
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom „Strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji" ( KOM(2006)0689 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘A strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union’ ( COM(2006)0689 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 201 in 202 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 201 and 202 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0143/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0143/2007 ),
A. ker se je Parlament v omenjeni resoluciji o strategiji poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja z dne 16.5.2006 (točka 21) zavzel, „da bo razmislil o izboljšanju svojih postopkov in notranjih zakonodajnih tehnik, da bi s tem pospešil proces poenostavitve, vendar ob spoštovanju postopkov, ki jih predvideva primarno pravo, predvsem Pogodba o ES“.
A. whereas Parliament undertook, in its abovementioned resolution of 16 May 2006 on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment (paragraph 21), ‘to give thought to the improvement of its procedures and its internal legislative techniques in order to speed up the simplification dossiers, while complying with the procedures laid down in primary law, in this particular case the EC Treaty’,
B. ker so tehnike kodifikacije in ponovnega sprejetja eno najpomembnejših orodij za poenostavitev zakonodaje Skupnosti, ki je del nove lizbonske strategije za rast in zaposlovanje v Evropi,
B. whereas codification and recasting techniques are among the most important tools for simplifying Community legislation, which is part of the new Lisbon strategy for growth and employment in Europe,
C. ker poslovnik vsebuje določbo o kodifikaciji, ki jo je treba pregledati, vendar ne vsebuje določbe o ponovnem sprejetju,
C. whereas the Rules of Procedure contain a provision on codification which should be revised, but no provision on recasting,
D. ker Parlament želi s pregledom in pojasnitvijo svojih postopkov resno prispevati k prizadevanjem za poenostavitev in spodbuditi Komisijo, da v ta namen pripravi več predlogov,
D. whereas Parliament wishes, through a re-examination and clarification of its procedures, to make a serious contribution to the simplification efforts and to encourage the Commission to make more proposals in this spirit,
E. ker je zaželeno, da Svet sprejme podobne ukrepe,
E. whereas it would be desirable for the Council to undertake similar steps,
Člen 80
Rule 80
Če se ugotovi, da predlog ne vsebuje vsebinskih sprememb obstoječe zakonodaje Skupnosti, se uporablja postopek iz člena 43.
Provided that it is ascertained that the proposal does not entail any change of substance to existing Community legislation, the procedure laid down in Rule 43 shall be followed .
Ta na podlagi načinov, dogovorjenih na medinstitucionalni ravni 1 , ugotovi, ali se omejuje zgolj na kodifikacijo brez vsebinskih sprememb.
The latter shall examine it in accordance with the arrangements agreed at interinstitutional level 1 in order to ascertain that it is a straightforward codification, with no changes of a substantive nature.
Po potrebi lahko pristojni odbor da svoje mnenje vnaprej.
If necessary, the committee responsible may give its opinion beforehand .
Člen 80 a (novo)
Rule 80a (new)
Člen 80 a
Rule 80a
Kadar Komisija predloži Parlamentu predlog ponovnega sprejetja zakonodaje Skupnosti, se predlog posreduje odboru, pristojnemu za pravne zadeve in pristojnemu odboru.
When a Commission proposal recasting Community legislation is submitted to Parliament, that proposal shall be referred to the committee responsible for legal affairs and the committee responsible.
Odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve na podlagi načinov, dogovorjenih na medinstitucionalni ravni 1 , ugotovi, ali predlog ne vsebuje vsebinskih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v predlogu opredeljene kot take.
The committee responsible for legal affairs shall examine it in accordance with the arrangements agreed at interinstitutional level 1 with a view to ascertaining that it entails no substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal.
Če odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve meni, da predlog ne vsebuje vsebinskih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so bile opredeljene kot take, o tem obvesti pristojni odbor.
If the committee responsible for legal affairs considers that the proposal does not entail any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal, it shall inform the committee responsible.
Vendar lahko predloge sprememb za dele, ki ostajajo nepremenjeni, izjemoma sprejme posamično predsednik tega odbora, če meni, da to zahtevata nujna skladnost besedila ali povezanost z drugimi dopustnimi predlogi sprememb.
However, amendments to the parts which have remained unchanged may be admitted as a special dispensation and on a case ‑by ‑case basis by the chairman of the above committee if he considers that this is necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text or because the amendments are inextricably linked to other admissible amendments.
Če odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve meni, da predlog vsebuje vsebinske spremembe, razen tistih, ki so bile opredeljene kot take, predlaga Parlamentu zavrnitev predloga in o tem obvesti pristojni odbor.
If the committee responsible for legal affairs considers that the proposal entails substantive changes other than those which have been identified as such in the proposal, it shall propose that Parliament reject the proposal and it shall inform the committee responsible that it has done so.
V tem primeru predsednik Komisijo pozove, da predlog umakne.
In such a case the President shall call upon the Commission to withdraw its proposal.
Če Komisija to stori, predsednik ugotovi, da je postopek brezpredmeten, in s tem seznani Svet.
If the Commission withdraws its proposal, the President shall record that the procedure is null and void and shall notify the Council of the fact.
Če Komisija svojega predloga ne umakne, Parlament zadevo vrne pristojnemu odboru, ki jo pregleda po običajnem postopku.
If the Commission does not withdraw its proposal, Parliament shall refer it to the committee responsible, which shall consider it in accordance with the normal procedure.
1 Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov, UL C 77, 28.3.2002, str.
1 Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
Zaradi predloga spremembe člena 80 Poslovnika, Kodifikacija, ki ga je predlagal Richard Corbett
Following a proposal to amend Rule 80 of the Rules of Procedure (Codification), made by Mr Corbett,
B6-0582/2005 z dne 26.10.2005. , je bil odbor pooblaščen, da pripravi poročilo o morebitnih spremembah poslovnika za prilagoditev notranjih postopkov zahtevam po poenostavitvi zakonodaje Skupnosti
B6-0582/2005 of 26.10.2005. our committee was authorised to draw up a report on possible changes to the Rules of Procedure to bring internal procedures into line with the requirements of simplification of Community legislation.
Zapisnik zasedanja z dne 15.12.2005. .
Minutes of the part-session of 15.12.2005.
Ta ukrep se vključi v odgovor Parlamenta na zadnjo pobudo Komisije v zvezi s poenostavitvijo.
This undertaking is part of Parliament’s response to the Commission’s latest simplification initiative.
Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z dne 25.10.2005 Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: Strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja KOM(2005)0535 .
Communication of the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: A strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’ (COM(2005) 0535).
Parlament se je zavzel, „da bo razmislil o izboljšanju svojih postopkov in notranjih zakonodajnih tehnik, da bi s tem pospešil proces poenostavitve, vendar ob spoštovanju postopkov, ki jih predvideva primarno pravo, predvsem pogodba o ES“.
Parliament has undertaken to ‘give thought to the improvement of its procedures and its internal legislative techniques in order to speed up the simplification dossiers, while complying with the procedures laid down in primary law, in this particular case the EC Treaty’.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o strategiji poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja z dne 16.5.2006, A6-80/2006 , točka 21.
European Parliament resolution of 16.5.2006 on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment, A6-80/2006 , paragraph 21.
Revidirati je treba določbe člena 80 poslovnika o kodifikaciji in tako vzpostaviti poseben postopek, ki bo drugačen od obstoječih enostavnih ali hitrih postopkov in bo hkrati ustrezal zahtevam kodifikacije in prenašal v poslovnik obveznosti, ki jih je Parlament sprejel z medinstitucionalnimi sporazumi.
It is necessary to amend the provisions of the rules on codification (Rule 80) by instituting a specific procedure which is different from the existing simplified and accelerated procedures, in order both to respond to the needs of codification and to incorporate into the rules various obligations that Parliament has accepted under interinstitutional agreements.
Razen tega je treba v poslovnik vnesti metodo ponovnega sprejetja pravnih aktov in predvideti poseben postopek, ki bo hkrati temeljil na postopku kodifikacije.
The technique of recasting must also be introduced into the Rules by providing for another specific procedure based on the ‘codification’ procedure.
Brez dvoma se to nikomur ni zdelo potrebno niti koristno.
This was probably not considered necessary, or even useful.
Tako se lahko postopki za njeno izvajanje, kot so bili določeni v sporazumu, v poslovniku sploh ne pojavijo, medtem ko so z materialnega stališča eden od „drugih postopkov“ v smislu poglavja 11.
So the way in which the technique of recasting is to be carried out, as laid down in the agreement, does not appear in the Rules of Procedure, even though from a practical point of view it is one of the ‘other procedures’ within the meaning of chapter 11 of the Rules.
Uvedba posebne določbe, namenjene ponovnemu sprejetju pravnih aktov, torej zapolnjuje to vrzel in si prizadeva, tako kot revizija člena 80 o kodifikaciji, za razjasnitev postopkov v Parlamentu in nenazadnje za spodbujanje Komisije, da izdela več predlogov za ponovno sprejetje pravnih aktov in s tem prispeva k prizadevanju po poenostavitvi prava Skupnosti.
The introduction of specific provisions on recasting will therefore make good this omission, and is an attempt, as was the revision of Article 80 on codification, to clarify Parliament’s procedures and, last but not least, to encourage the Commission to draw up more proposals for recasting, thus contributing to the efforts to simplify Community legislation.
Na ravni poslovnika je treba odgovoriti na vprašanje, ki se občasno zastavlja ob oceni predlogov za ponovno sprejetje pravnih aktov, in sicer, v kakšnem obsegu se lahko kodifikacijski del takšnega predloga spremeni s predlogi sprememb.
We must give a response at the level of the Rules of Procedure to the question that sometimes arises when recasting proposals are being considered of the extent to which the codifying part of such a proposal is able to be changed by amendments.
Poročevalec je v delovnem dokumentu najprej predlagal pet možnosti za rešitev te težave.
Your rapporteur initially proposed, in a working document, five possible approaches to this problem.
Po mnenju poročevalca potrebi po določeni prilagodljivosti v izjemnih primerih in želji, da se postopki ne bi preveč zapletali, najbolj ustreza rešitev v odstavku 3 novega člena.
The option incorporated in paragraph 3 of the new rule seems to your rapporteur to be the best response to both the need for a certain flexibility in exceptional situations and the desire not to complicate the procedures excessively.
Pripravljavec mnenja se v celoti strinja s pristopom poročevalca pristojnega odbora.
Your draftsman agrees on the whole with the approach taken by the rapporteur of the committee responsible.
Ena glavnih nalog Evropskega parlamenta je izboljšava postopkov in notranjih zakonodajnih metod, da bi pospešil obdelavo dokumentov za poenostavitev.
One of the primary obligations of the European Parliament is to improve its procedures and its internal legislative techniques in order to speed up the processing of simplification dossiers.
To prizadevanje pa ne sme odstopati od postopkov, določenih v primarni zakonodaji, zlasti postopka soodločanja, kjer ima Parlament glavno vlogo zaradi svojega demokratičnega prispevka k načinu sprejemanja odločitev v EU.
Nevertheless, this effort must not detract from the procedures laid down in primary law, especially the codecision procedure where the role of Parliament is of the highest importance owing to its democratic contribution to the decision-making process of the EU.
To pomeni, da mora biti vsak predlog spremembe notranjih postopkov Parlamenta v skladu z ustreznimi določbami pogodb.
In short, this means that any amendments to Parliament’s internal procedures must comply with the relevant provisions of the Treaties.
Pripravljavec mnenja zato priporoča nekatere spremembe poslovnika, o katerih je treba razmisliti, da bodo cilji poenostavitve dovolj verodostojni in lahko dosegljivi.
Your draftsman suggests, therefore, certain modifications of the Rules of Procedure which should be taken into consideration with a view to ensuring that the goals of simplification are sufficiently credible and easy to be attained.
Sprememba člena 80 je potrebna zaradi poenostavitve mehanizma sprejemanja kodifikacije v smislu obveznosti, ki jih prevzemajo vse zainteresirane strani z namenom poenostavitve postopka.
Revision of Rule 80 seems necessary in order to streamline the mechanism for the adoption of codifications in the light of the commitments entered into by all relevant stakeholders with regard to the simplification process.
Spremenjeni člen 80 bo Odboru za pravne zadeve omogočil, da preuči obseg uporabe predloga kodifikacije in ga naslovi neposredno na plenarno zasedanje, če ne vsebuje znatnih sprememb.
The amended Rule 80 will enable the Committee on Legal Affairs to examine the scope of a codification proposal and refer it directly to the Plenary if it does not contain any substantive changes.
Če pa jih, odbor obvesti predsednika, ki zadevni predlog naslovi na odbor, pristojen za pregled.
If it does, the Committee will propose the rejection of the Commission proposal.
Sprejeti bi bilo treba tudi nov člen 80a, ki bo zagotavljal poseben postopek preoblikovanja zakonodajnih besedil.
A new Rule 80a should then be introduced in order to provide a specific procedure for recasting legislative texts.
Kot je navedeno v resoluciji EP o strategiji poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja, je preoblikovanje skupaj s kodifikacijo eno glavnih sredstev za poenostavitev pravnega reda Skupnosti in bi ga bilo treba uporabljati v čim večjem obsegu.
As already stated in the EP Resolution on a Strategy for simplification of the regulatory environment, recasting is, along with codification, one of the primary means of simplifying the acquis communautaire and should be used as widely as possible.
Novi člen 80a bo pooblastil Odbor za pravne zadeve, da bo pregledal vse predloge za preoblikovanje.
New Rule 80a will therefore empower the Committee on Legal Affairs to examine any recasting proposals.
Predlogi bodo naslovljeni na odbor, pristojen za pregled, ki bo imel različna pooblastila za spremembe, odvisno od izida pregleda Odbora za pravne zadeve.
Each proposal will be referred to the committee responsible for consideration, which will enjoy special amending powers depending on the outcome of the Legal Affairs Committee’s examination.
Veljavno besedilo
Present text
Člen 80, odstavek 1
Rule 80, paragraph 1
Odbor predlog pregleda, da se prepriča, da gre zgolj za kodifikacijo, ki ne vsebuje vsebinskih sprememb.
The latter shall examine it in order to ascertain that it is no more than a mere codification embodying no changes of a substantive nature.
Namen tega predloga spremembe je poenostavitev obravnave predlogov kodifikacije v odboru, pristojnem za pravne zadeve, in sicer z jasnejšim besedilom in doslednejšim postopkom ter črtanjem vseh sklicev na člen 43, s čimer se bo mogoče izogniti nepotrebnim zapletom na ravni odbora, obstoječa pooblastila na plenarnih zasedanjih pa bodo ostala nespremenjena.
This amendment aims at simplifying the processing of codification proposals within the committee responsible for legal affairs, by means of a clearer text and a stricter procedure, for deleting any reference to Rule 43 would avoid needless complexity at the committee level and, at the same time, would leave the present prerogatives of the plenary unchanged.
Prva faza postopka, ki bo potekala v Odboru za pravne zadeve, bo zato preprostejša in učinkovitejša.
As a result, the first phase of the procedure, which will take place within the Committee on Legal Affairs, will be simpler and more effective.
Člen 80, odstavek 2
Rule 80, paragraph 2
Po potrebi lahko pristojni odbor da svoje mnenje vnaprej.
If necessary, the committee responsible may give opinion beforehand.
Odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve, lahko pristojni odbor zaprosi za mnenje.
The committee responsible for legal affairs may ask the committee responsible for consideration for an opinion.
Predlagana sprememba se nanaša na možnost Odbora za pravne zadeve, da pristojni odbor zaprosi za mnenje, ki je sestavni del ocene v okviru pregleda predloga kodifikacije.
The proposed change concerns the possibility for the Committee on Legal Affairs to ask the committee responsible for an opinion as an element of assessment while examining the proposal for codification.
Predlog spremembe je v skladu s trenutno prakso in bi pristojnemu odboru dopuščal, da posreduje mnenje, če se ga od njega zahteva.
This amendment reflects the practice currently followed and, in any case, would let the committee responsible intervene by means of an opinion, if requested.
Prva faza postopka, ki se mora izvesti v Odboru za pravne zadeve, bo zato preprostejša in doslednejša.
As a result, the first phase of the procedure, to be followed within the Committee on Legal Affairs, will be simpler and stricter.
Člen 80, odstavek 3
Rule 80, paragraph 3
Če odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve, ugotovi, da predlog ne vsebuje nobene vsebinske spremembe zakonodaje Skupnosti, ga predloži Parlamentu v odobritev z enim samim glasovanjem, pri čemer so predlogi sprememb besedila predloga nedopustni.
If the committee responsible for legal affairs concludes that the proposal does not contain any substantive change to Community legislation, it shall refer it to Parliament for its approval by a single vote, with any amendments to the text of the proposal being inadmissible.
Člena 43 in 131, ki se nanašata na poenostavljeni postopek in postopek na plenarnem zasedanju brez predlogov sprememb in razprave, vsebujeta določbe, ki omogočajo, da se vložijo predlogi sprememb.
Rules 43 and 131, which deal with the ‘simplified procedure’ and the ‘procedure in plenary without amendment and debate’ respectively, contain provisions enabling the proposal to be open to amendment.
Takšna možnost ni v skladu s konceptom kodifikacije in je nezdružljiva z obstoječim medinstitucionalnim sporazumom o tej temi, zlasti z odstavkom 6 tega sporazuma, iz katerega izhaja, da se Parlament in Svet zavezujeta, da ne bosta vsebinsko spreminjala predlogov za kodifikacijo.
Any such possibility is, however, at variance with the whole concept of codification, and incompatible with the existing interinstitutional agreement on the subject, and in particular paragraph 6 thereof, from which it can be deduced that the intention of Parliament and the Council is to commit themselves not to make any substantive changes to codification proposals.
Člen 80, odstavek 3 a (novo)
Rule 80, paragraph 3 a (new)
Če odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve, ugotovi, da predlog vsebuje vsebinske spremembe zakonodaje Skupnosti, predlaga njegovo zavrnitev.
If the committee responsible for legal affairs concludes that the proposal does contain substantive changes to Community legislation, it shall propose that the proposal be rejected.
Zavrnitev predloga je ustreznejša rešitev kot uporaba običajnega postopka.
Rejecting the proposal would appear to be a more sensible solution than reverting to the normal procedure.
Če predlog Komisije ne ustreza pravilom za kodifikacijo, ga je v luči poenostavitve bolj smiselno vrniti Komisiji s priporočilom, naj ga znova pretehta (na primer nadomesti s predlogom za preoblikovanje), namesto da se Parlament obremeni z dodatnim delom.
If the Commission proposal fails to comply with the codification rules, surely it is more logical, in the context of simplification, to refer the proposal back to the Commission and ask it to ‘rethink’ its proposal (for example, by replacing it with a recasting proposal) than to burden the Parliament with additional work.
Člen 80 a (novo)
Rule 80 a (new)
Člen 80a
Rule 80a
Kadar Komisija Parlamentu predloži predlog uradnega preoblikovanja zakonodaje Skupnosti, se predlog pošlje odboru, pristojnemu za pravne zadeve, ki ga pregleda.
When a Commission proposal for official recasting of Community legislation is submitted to Parliament, it shall be referred to the committee responsible for legal affairs, which shall examine it.