natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalec potrjuje, da obstajajo med posameznimi državami članicami velike razlike v strukturi ribiškega sektorja in se zato delo, ki ga imajo nacionalni organi z zbiranjem in obdelavo podatkov o količini in vrednosti iztovora ribiških proizvodov, ustrezno razlikuje.
The rapporteur acknowledges that there are major differences in structure between the fisheries sectors in the various Member States and that the job of the national authorities in collecting and processing data on the volume and value of landings of fishery products differs accordingly.
Razlike so tudi v načinu organizacije sistemov ribiških statistik in v tehnikah, ki se uporabljajo za zbiranje podatkov.
There are also differences in the way in which national fisheries statistics systems are organised and in the data collection techniques used.
Prilagojeni morajo biti razmeram in strukturi ribiškega sektorja v posamezni državi članici.
These must be tailored to the situation and the structure of the fisheries sector in each Member State.
Poleg tega je treba zbrane podatke vzporejati in uskladiti, zato da se zagotovi razpoložljivost primerljivih podatkov, potrebnih za oblikovanje in spremljanje pravičnih in učinkovitih ukrepov Skupnosti v zvezi s skupno ureditvijo trga z ribiškimi proizvodi in proizvodi iz ribogojstva.
Furthermore, the data collected need to be coordinated and harmonised so as to ensure the availability of the comparable data required for the formulation and monitoring of fair and effective Community policies in connection with the common organisation of the market in fisheries and acquaculture products.
Poročevalec meni, da bo mogoče podatke na podlagi predlaganih sprememb učinkoviteje razčlenjevati in uporabljati.
The rapporteur believes that the proposed changes will enable the data to be analysed and used more effectively.
Večina vloženih predlogov sprememb je namenjenih večji jasnosti in skladnosti besedila.
Most of the amendments tabled seek to make the text clearer and more consistent.
V enem od predlogov sprememb so upoštevane težave, ki jih lahko nekaterim državam članicam povzroča dolžnost predložitve podatkov o vseh predvidenih vrstah uporabe iz Priloge IV.
On of the amendments takes due account of the difficulties that may be caused for some Member States by the obligation to submit data on all the intended uses provided for in Annex IV.
Predlagana je omejitev obvezne predložitve podatkov na prvi dve kategoriji (prehrano ljudi in industrijsko uporabo), predložitev podatkov o drugih predvidenih vrstah uporabe pa bi bila prostovoljna.
It is proposed that mandatory submissions should be restricted to the first two categories (human consumption and industrial use), while the submission of data on the other intended uses would be made voluntary.
Poročevalec predstavlja tudi predlog spremembe, namen katerega je zagotoviti redno obveščanje Parlamenta in Sveta, ki bosta tako lahko spremljala izvajanje ureditve, zlasti glede pomembnosti in kakovosti zbranih statističnih podatkov.
The rapporteur also puts forward an amendment seeking to ensure that Parliament and the Council regularly receive information enabling them to monitor implementation of the Regulation, particularly in connection with the relevance and quality of the statistics compiled.
Obveščanje bi moralo vključevati analizo stroškovne učinkovitosti uvedenega sistema in poročila o preverjenih praksah za zmanjšanje obsega dela nacionalnih organov in izboljšanje uporabnosti in kakovosti podatkov.
This should include a cost-effectiveness analysis of the system introduced and reports on best practices for lessening the workload for national authorities and enhancing the usefulness and quality of the data.
Predlog vsebuje tudi spremembo postopka komitologije.
The proposal also contains a change in comitology procedure.
Regulativni postopek iz člena 5 Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES se nadomesti z upravljalnim postopkom (člen 4 istega sklepa).
The regulatory procedure provided for in Article 5 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC is replaced by the management procedure (Article 4 of the same decision).
Regulativni postopek je trenutno predviden v členu 6 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1382/91, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1882/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. septembra 2003.
The regulatory procedure is currently provided for in Article 6 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1382/91, as last amended by European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of 29 September 2003.
V skladu s sodno prakso Skupnosti je ta sprememba utemeljena v enem od predlogov sprememb.
One of the amendments puts forward reasons for this change, in line with Community case law.
Skratka, poročevalec podpira predlog Komisije, če bo spremenjen v skladu z vloženimi predlogi sprememb.
To wind up, the rapporteur endorses the Commission proposal, subject to the changes contained in the amendments tabled.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o predložitvi podatkov o iztovoru ribiških proizvodov v državah članicah
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the submission of data on landings of fishery products in Member States
o javni obravnavi z naslovom Za nadaljnjo konsolidacijo na področju industrije finančnih storitev
on Towards further consolidation in the financial services industry
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta službe Komisije z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o čezmejni konsolidaciji v finančnem sektorju EU ( SEC(2005)1398 ),
– having regard to the Commission Staff Working Document of 26 October 2005 on cross-border consolidation in the EU financial sector ( SEC(2005)1398 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 21. oktobra 2005 o naložbah znotraj EU v sektorju finančnih storitev
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 21 October 2005 on Intra-EU investment in the financial services’ sector
UL C 293, 25.11.2005, str.
OJ C 293, 25.11.2005, p.2. ,
– ob upoštevanju Bele knjige s 1. decembra 2005 o politiki finančnih storitev 2005–2010 ( KOM(2005)0629 ),
– having regard to the White Paper of 1 December 2005 on Financial Services Policy 2005-2010 ( COM(2005)0629 ),
– ob upoštevanju direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/87/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o dopolnilnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij, zavarovalnic in investicijskih družb v finančnem konglomeratu
– having regard to the Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate
UL L 35, 11.2.2003, str.
OJ L 35, 11.2.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/1/ES z dne 9. marca 2005 o vzpostavitvi nove organizacijske strukture odborov za finančne storitve
– having regard to the Directive 2005/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2005 on a new organisational structure for financial services committees
UL L 79, 24.3.2005, str.
OJ L 79, 24.3.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2157/2001 z dne 8. oktobra 2001 o statutu evropske družbe (SE)
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European company (SE)
– ob upoštevanju direktiv Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o preoblikovanju direktive 2000/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. marca 2000 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti kreditnih institucij in direktive Sveta 93/6/EGS z dne 15. marca 1993 o kapitalski ustreznosti investicijskih družb in kreditnih institucij ( KOM(2004)0486 ),
– having regard to the Directives of the European Parliament and Council re-casting Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 relating to the take-up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions and Council Directive 93/6/EEC of 15 March 1993 on the capital adequacy of investment firms and credit institutions ( COM(2004)0486 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 28. aprila 2005 o trenutnem stanju integracije finančnih trgov EU
– having regard to its resolution of 28 April 2005 on the current state of integration of EU financial markets
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 21. novembra 2002 o pravilih bonitetnega nadzora v Evropski uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 21 November 2002 on prudential supervision rules in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6–0170/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0170/2006 ),
A. ker se gospodarstvo EU po svetu in doma srečuje z različnimi izzivi, kot so intenzivna konkurenca, počasna rast, staranje prebivalstva in rast pokojninskih obveznosti,
A. whereas the economy of the EU is facing diverse challenges at the global and domestic level, such as intense competition, sluggish growth, population ageing and pension liability growth,
B. ker mora biti cilj za stabilnost in varnost finančnih trgov enak prizadevanju za zmanjšanje ovir za čezmejne dejavnosti v zvezi s finančnimi dejavnostmi,
B. whereas the goal of stability and security of financial markets must be equal to the effort to reduce obstacles to cross-border activities concerning financial activities,
C. ker so močni, stabilni in učinkoviti finančni trgi in institucije ključnega pomena za zadovoljevanje finančnih potreb različnih gospodarskih udeležencev EU ter spodbujanje rasti in zaposlovanja,
C. whereas strong, stable and efficient financial markets and institutions are crucial to meeting the financing needs of the EU’s various economic actors and to boosting growth and employment,
D. ker ima stabilen in konkurenčen sektor finančnih storitev zaupanje potrošnikov, če temelji na visoki ravni varstva potrošnikov,
D. whereas a stable and competitive financial services sector benefits from consumer confidence if it is based on a high level of consumer protection,
E. ker konsolidacija ustvarja možnost za ekonomijo obsega in razpona, sinergije in stroškovno učinkovitost ter v povezavi z nadaljnjim povezovanjem trgov lahko pospešuje rast in naložbe s pospeševanjem likvidnosti in učinkovitosti trgov,
E. whereas consolidation creates a potential for economies of scale and scope, synergies, and cost efficiencies, and, if coupled with further market integration, can encourage growth and favour investment by fostering the liquidity and efficiency of markets,
F. ker je naloga EU in oblikovalcev nacionalne politike, da vzpostavijo pravni in nadzorni okvir, ki spodbuja rast, izboljšuje konkurenčnost gospodarstva EU, zagotavlja enake konkurenčne možnosti, varuje učinkovitost, celovitost, preglednost trga in stabilnost finančnega sistema ter ščiti deponente, investitorje in zavarovane osebe,
F. whereas the role of EU and national policy makers is to set up a regulatory and supervisory framework that stimulates growth; improves the competitiveness of the EU’s economy; guarantees a level playing field; safeguards market efficiency, integrity, transparency and the stability of the financial system; and protects depositors, investors and insured persons,
G. ker morajo biti potrebe potrošnikov in raznolikost ponudbe kakovostnih produktov glavni cilj katere koli politike na tem področju,
G. whereas consumer needs and diversity of choice between quality products should be the main aim of any policy in this sector,
H. ker je treba usmeriti dovolj pozornosti na mnenja in dobro počutje zaposlenih in kupcev, ki sta pomembni interesni skupini v finančnih institucijah, ki so predmet združitev in prevzemov,
H. whereas adequate attention should be focused on the opinions and welfare of employees and customers, both of which are important stakeholders in financial institutions undergoing Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A),
I. ker je treba odpraviti neupravičene nacionalne prakse ter zaščitne in diskriminacijske ukrepe, ker povzročajo drobljenje trga in kupcem odvzemajo ugodnosti, ki jih prinaša konsolidacija,
I. whereas unjustifiable national practices and protectionist and discriminatory measures should be tackled because they fragment the market and deprive consumers of the benefits of consolidation,
Splošna pričakovanja
General perspectives
4. pozdravlja pozitiven vpliv evra in Akcijskega načrta za finančne storitve na povezovanje grosističnih finančnih trgov, preglednost in likvidnost trgov ter posodabljanje in dokončno vzpostavitev finančnih pravnih okvirov EU, čeprav do sedaj še ni zaključkov o vseh posledicah povezovanja finančnih trgov z enotno valuto;
Welcomes the positive effects of the euro and the FSAP on the integration of wholesale financial markets, on market transparency and liquidity, and on modernising and completing the EU's financial regulatory framework even though not all the consequences of the single currency to the integration of the financial markets have yet been realized;
7. ponovno opozarja, da konsolidacija kot taka ne sme biti cilj, ampak mora nedvomno koristiti gospodarstvu s spodbujanjem rasti in inovacij ter izboljšanjem dostopa do denarne podpore, kar bo finančnim institucijam omogočilo izrabo sinergije in stroškovne učinkovitosti ter potrošnikom ponudilo večjo izbiro in boljšo kakovost, obenem pa večjo zaščito;
Recalls that consolidation should not be an political objective per se , but should bring clear benefits to the economy by stimulating growth, encouraging innovation, ensuring competition, improving access to funding, allowing financial institutions to exploit synergies and cost efficiencies, and giving consumers a greater choice and better quality, while ensuring an adequate level of consumer protection;
10. ocenjuje, da mora struktura finančnih storitev na ravni Unije zagotoviti soobstoj različnih struktur in velikosti, da bi imela na voljo učinkovite in konkurenčne udeležence na mednarodni ravni in tudi v sosednjih omrežjih;
Considers that the architecture of financial services at EU level should be such as to guarantee the co-existence of different structures and sizes in order to provide for efficient and competitive players both at international level and within proximity networks;
Ovire za čezmejno konsolidacijo
Barriers to cross-border consolidation
17. je zaskrbljen, ker se finančne institucije, ki želijo razvijati svoje strategije na ravni EU, pogosto srečujejo z dragimi in dolgotrajnimi pravnimi in nadzornimi praksami ter neenotnimi zahtevami glede poročanja;
Is concerned that financial institutions seeking to develop their strategies at EU level are frequently confronted with costly and time-consuming regulatory and supervisory practices and differing reporting requirements;
20. ugotavlja, da je integracija na grosističnem trgu skoraj zaključena, zlasti da je integracija na denarnih trgih zelo napredovala ter da se objave o povečanju in zmanjšanju obrestnih mer hitro in dobro izrazijo v tržnih cenah;
Notes that the integration on the wholesale markets has been nearly completed and, in particular, that integration on the money markets is far advanced, and that announcements of increases and decreases in interest rates are quickly and well reflected in the market prices;
23. ugotavlja, da sedanja davčna obravnava dividend v EU spodbuja izplačilo notranjih dividend namesto dividend EU; ugotavlja tudi, da v primeru dividend EU tuji odtegnjeni davek lahko ostane trajno breme za posamezne delničarje in zato povzroči bistveno zmanjšanje čistega donosa njihovih tujih naložb EU;
Notes, that the current tax treatment of dividends in some Member States favours payouts of domestic rather than EU dividends; notes also that in the case of EU dividends, foreign withholding tax could remain a definitive burden for the individual shareholders and therefore causes a significant reduction in the net return of their EU foreign investment;
26. verjame, da je pluralistična struktura evropskega bančnega trga, na katerem imajo lahko finančne institucije različno pravno naravo, v skladu z različnimi poslovnimi cilji naložba za evropsko gospodarstvo in ne sme biti vprašljiva;
Believes that the pluralistic structure of the European banking market, on which financial institutions can take different legal forms, according to their differing business objectives, is an asset to the European economy and should not be called into question;
Pravni in nadzorni sistem
Regulatory and supervisory system
Struktura trga
Market structure
33. poziva Komisijo, da v predlogih ustrezno upošteva težave, s katerimi se srečujejo nekateri nacionalni zakonodajalci pri posredovanju na trgih z močno prisotnostjo tujega kapitala;
Calls on the Commission to take due account in its proposals of the difficulties experienced by certain national regulators in intervening in markets characterised by a very strong presence of foreign capital;
37. ugotavlja, da sedanji nadzorni sistem vodi do večkratnih zahtev glede poročanja za banke in da je torej približevanje standardov pomembna naloga za vse nadzorne institucije;
Notes that the current supervisory system leads to multiple reporting requirements for banks and that, therefore, an important task for all supervisory institutions is to converge the standards;
Konsolidacija v finančnem sektorju ni novost; vendar pa je pred kratkim na osnovi povezovanja finančnih trgov EU razvila novo hitrost in nov obseg.
Consolidation in the financial sector is not a new phenomenon; but it has recently developed a new speed and scope following the integration of EU financial markets.
Hkrati to ni le evropski, ampak tudi mednarodni trend, ki ga spodbujajo spremembe v strukturi, tehnološki napredek in večja svetovna konkurenca.
At the same time it is not only a European trend but an international one driven by structural changes, technological progress and intensified global competition.
Ta proces ima lahko različne oblike, od dejanske rasti v obliki tujih podružnic in hčerinskih družb do združitev in prevzemov.
This process can take various forms, from organic growth in the form of foreign branches and subsidiaries to mergers and acquisitions.
Ta proces se je v EU z deregulacijo in stalnimi ukrepi s strani evropskih institucij na področju konkurence racionaliziral in uvedba evra ter dobro izvajanje pravil konkurence in finančne zakonodaje sta ga postavila v ospredje.
In the EU, it has been streamlined by deregulation and consistent action by European institutions in the competition field, and it has been pushed forward by the introduction of Euro, clear and well enforced competition rules and financial legislation.
Konsolidacija se pojavlja na različnih ravneh.
Consolidation occurs at different levels.
V Evropi se izvaja močna konsolidacija trga.
Europe is witnessing a strong market consolidation.
V zvezi s tem so nedavno sprejeti ukrepi v okviru Akcijskega načrta za finančne storitve zelo pospešili povezovanje grosističnih trgov.
In this respect, the recently adopted package of measures of the Financial Services Action Plan has advanced considerably wholesale market integration.
Banke, zavarovalnice in finančne institucije, ki so v preteklosti odražale državne meje in tradicionalno ločenost finančnih dejavnosti (kot so dejavnosti, povezane z bančništvom, zavarovanji in vrednostnimi papirji ter upravljanjem sredstev), postajajo vedno bolj vsestranske glede produktov in storitev, ki jih ponujajo, ter čezmejno delujejo.
Banks, insurance, and financial institutions, which used to reflect national borders and traditional separation of financial activities (such as banking, insurance and securities and asset management activities), are increasingly becoming universal as to the products and services they supply, and operate on a cross-border basis.
Z napredkom evropskega povezovanja so združitve in prevzemi bank ter drugih finančnih institucij postale vsakodnevni pojav in iz njih so nastale velike finančne skupine ter konglomerati, ki delujejo na podlagi različnih evropskih pristojnosti.
With European integration advancing, banks and other financial institutions´ mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are almost a daily phenomenon and have resulted in giant financial groups and conglomerates operating under various European jurisdictions.
Dojemanja konsolidacije so različna.
Perceptions about consolidation differ.
Na eni strani je to pomembno gonilo, ki pospešuje konkurenčnost evropskega gospodarstva, oblikuje velike finančne skupine in konglomerate, omogoča podjetjem doseganje kritične mase ter uresničitev pomembnih sinergij, ekonomije obsega in povezanosti ter stroškovne učinkovitosti, in, kar je najpomembneje, ponuja potrošnikom večjo izbiro in boljšo ceno finančnih produktov.
On one hand, it is seen as an important driver enhancing the competitiveness of European economy, forging big financial groups and conglomerates, allowing companies to reach critical mass and realize important synergies, economies of scale and scope and cost efficiencies, and, most importantly, it offers consumers a greater choice and better price for their financial products.
Na drugi strani pa ima lahko konsolidacija tudi neugodne posledice, ki izvirajo iz visoke stopnje koncentracije, soodvisnosti in sistemskega tveganja, ki ga lahko povzroči propad velikih finančnih institucij in konglomeratov, ki delujejo v več državah članicah.
On the other hand, there are also downside risks to consolidation, emanating from a high level of concentration, interdependence and systemic risk that can be due to a failure of major financial institutions and conglomerates operating in several Member States.
Ob tem je pogosto mogoče občutiti, da lahko zaradi tržne moči, ki je koncentrirana v rokah nekaj velikih finančnih institucij in finančnih centrov, regije ter mala in srednje velika podjetja izgubijo zelo potreben dostop do poceni financiranja, da bodo močne finančne skupine izrinile s trga manjše finančne institucije in da se bo izbira potrošnikov omejila na standardizirane produkte.
Furthermore, it is frequently felt that concentration of market power in the hands of a few major financial institutions and financial centres could deprive regions and SMEs from the most needed access to cheap financing, that robust financial groups will push smaller financial institutions out of the market and that consumers' choice will be limited to standardized products.
Sedanje stanje in pričakovanja
Current situation and perspectives
Združitve in prevzemi so najpogostejša strategija za dostop na trg in rast.
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are the most frequent market access and growth strategy.
Čeprav so se doslej izvajali predvsem na nacionalni ravni, obstoj velikih čezmejnih skupin in finančnih konglomeratov nakazuje veliko željo po medsektorskem in čezmejnem širjenju v vsej EU.
Although until now they have occurred mostly at national level, the existence of big cross-border groups and financial conglomerates demonstrates a significant appetite both for cross-sector and cross-border expansion throughout the EU.
Razvoj dogodkov v nekaterih regijah
Developments in some regions
Delovni dokument za osebje Komisije SEC(2005) 1398. lahko v prihodnosti pomeni okrepitev čezmejnih dejavnosti.
Commission Staff Working Document SEC(2005) 1398. may suggest a future intensification of cross-border activities.
V Beneluksu in skandinavski regiji je prevelika nasičenost trga prisilila domače udeležence v čezmejno širitev in povzročila oblikovanje nekaterih velikih evropskih finančnih skupin.
In the Benelux and Scandinavian regions, market saturation pressed domestic players to expand cross-border and resulted in the creation of some major European financial groups.
Obstoječe ovire
Existing obstacles
Veliko ovir
Many obstacles
Delovni dokument za osebje Komisije SEC(2005) 1398. preprečuje čezmejne transakcije, odvrača udeležence na trgu ter zmanjšuje čezmejno sinergijo, ekonomije obsega in dosega ter stroškovno učinkovitost.
Commission Staff Working Document SEC(2005) 1398. hinder cross-border transactions, discourage market players and diminish cross-border synergies and economies of scale and scope and cost efficiencies.
To so zlasti:
In particular: