natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
N ker je Evropski parlament že decembra 1999 prejel zahtevo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, katere namen je bil spremeniti določbo o statutu varuha človekovih pravic v zvezi z njegovo pravico do dostopa do dokumentov in zaslišanja prič; ker ne glede na to, da je Evropski parlament priporočil, da se te določbe spremenijo; se le-te še vedno niso spremenile zaradi pomislekov dela Komisije in Sveta,
N. whereas as long ago as December 1999 the European Parliament received a request from the Ombudsman which aimed to amend the provisions of the Statute of the Ombudsman concerning his right of access to documents and the hearing of witnesses; whereas, although the European Parliament recommended amending these provisions, they have still not been amended due to reservations on the part of the Commission and the Council,
O ker je varuh človekovih pravic z obžalovanjem zaradi negativnih stališč do predloga 17. decembra 2002 predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta pisno predlagal, da službe varuha človekovih pravic in Evropskega parlamenta skupno preučijo vprašanje revizije statuta varuha človekovih pravic,
O. Whereas the Ombudsman, regretting the negative views on the proposal, suggested in a letter of 17 December 2002 to the President of the European Parliament that the services of the Ombudsman and the European Parliament jointly examine the question of the revision of the Ombudsman's Statute,
P ker letno poročilo kaže prizadevanja varuha človekovih pravic, da nadaljuje z vzpostavljanjem mreže nacionalnih in regionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic, s posebnim poudarkom na državah pristopnicah,
P. whereas the Annual Report shows the efforts made by the Ombudsman to continue developing the network of national and regional Ombudsmen, with particular emphasis on the applicant countries,
1. odobri letno poročilo za leto 2003, ki ga je predložil evropski varuh človekovih pravic in ki predstavlja obsežen pregled izvedenih dejavnosti v letu 2003 in opis obravnavanih primerov;
Approves the Annual Report for 2003 submitted by the European Ombudsman, which provides a comprehensive overview of the activities conducted during the year and a description of cases processed;
Diamandourosa, ki je od začetka svojega mandata aprila 2003 uspešno sledil ciljem povečanja učinkovitosti Urada evropskega varuha človekovih pravic in spodbujal dobro javno upravo, spoštovanje pravne države in spoštovanje človekovih pravic;
Commends the efforts of Mr Diamandouros who, since taking office in April 2003, has successfully pursued the objectives of enhancing the effectiveness of the European Ombudsman's Office and promoting good public administration, respect for the rule of law and respect for human rights;
7. ugotavlja precejšnje povečanje števila pritožb, kar opozarja na uspeh varuha človekovih pravic, saj je državljanom, ki so v stiku z institucijami EU, povečal zavedanje o njihovih pravicah v zvezi s tem;
Notes that there has been a substantial increase in the number of complaints, which highlights the success achieved by the Ombudsman in making citizens who are in contact with EU institutions increasingly aware of their rights in this respect;
11. ugotavlja, da je varuh človekovih pravic institucijam, še posebej Svetu, v zvezi s pritožbami o težavah pri pridobitvi dostopa do dokumentov tako kot leta 2003 podal kritično pripombo; opozarja, da se je odbor za peticije ukvarjal s problemom iz poročila v zvezi s pritožbo NVO "Statewatch", in da se je Svet v zvezi s tem zavezal, da bo v prihodnje spoštoval pravila o dostopu do dokumentov;
Notes that, likewise in 2003, the Ombudsman presented a critical remark to institutions, in particular to the Council, concerning complaints about difficulties in obtaining access to documents; recalls that the Committee on Petitions dealt with this problem in a report concerning a complaint from the NGO "Statewatch", and that the Council had in that context given its assurance that it would in future respect the rules on access to documents;
43. ; poudarja, da morajo institucije in organi EU, še preden morebiti uporabijo določbe o odstopanju od načela prostega dostopa, posebej skrbno in primer za primerom preučiti vsako zahtevo;
43. in a spirit of recognition that access to documents held by the European institutions and bodies is a fundamental right pursuant to Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and with the sincere objective of taking decisions as 'openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen'; stresses that the institutions and bodies of the EU should examine each request extremely carefully and on a case by case basis before the provisions on derogations from the principle of free access are possibly applied;
14. opozarja na svojo resolucijo z dne 14. marca 2003 o izvajanju Uredbe 1049/2001
Recalls its resolution of 14 March 2003 on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001
UL C 47 E, 27.2.2003, str.
OJ C 47 E, 27.2.2003, p.
15. podpira poziv Komisiji, da pripravi predloge sprememb Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, še posebej kar zadeva dostop do zakonodajnih dokumentov;
Supports the call for the Commission to bring forward proposals to amend Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, especially in relation to access to legislative documents;
17. z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da se je Svet po dveh pritožbah pri varuhu človekovih pravic odločil slediti priporočilu varuha človekovih pravic in kandidatom v njihovem izbirnem postopku za zaposlitev omogoča dostop do njihovih ocenjenih testov; ta način naj postane praksa tudi v Parlamentu in Komisiji;
Notes with satisfaction that the Council, after two complaints to the Ombudsman, decided to follow the recommendation of the Ombudsman and give candidates in its recruitment competitions access to their marked examination scripts, thus bringing it into line with the practice in the Parliament and the Commission;
19. ugotavlja, da se številne pritožbe, ki so jim sledile kritične pripombe varuha človekovih pravic, nanašajo bodisi na neodgovarjanje bodisi na nezadovoljive ali nevljudne odgovore; zato opominja institucije in organe, da je primerna in pravilna komunikacija z državljani v njihovem lastnem interesu;
Notes that many complaints which have resulted in a critical remark from the Ombudsman concern delays in answering correspondence, failure to answer or insufficient or discourteous answers ; therefore reminds the institutions and bodies that adequate and correct communication with citizens is in their own interest;
21. opozarja, da je Parlament 6. septembra 2001 sprejel resolucijo o kodeksu dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev za institucije in organe EU in da je po tem neprestano ponavljal, da morajo ta kodeks upoštevati vse institucije in organi; obžaluje, da Komisija doslej ni povsem sprejela in uporabila kodeksa;
Recalls that Parliament adopted on 6 September 2001 a resolution on a Code of Good Administrative Behaviour for EU institutions and bodies, and that it has since then repeatedly insisted that this code be applied by all institutions and bodies; regrets the failure by the Commission so far to fully adopt and apply the Code;
23. poziva varuha človekovih pravic, da ob izvajanju zakona o dobrem upravljanju sodeluje z odborom za peticije v smeri nadaljnjega razvoja meril o primernem ravnanju javnih uslužbencev v zvezi s postopkom ugotavljanja kršitev, ki ga je vzpostavil sklep varuha človekovih pravic o pritožbi 995/98, in zagotavljanja, da Komisija izvaja ta merila;
Invites the Ombudsman, pending the implementation of the law on good administration, to work together with the Committee on Petitions in further developing, and ensuring implementation by the Commission of, the criteria for good administrative behaviour with respect to the infringement procedure established in the Ombudsman's Decision on Complaint 995/98;
UL C72 E, 21.3.2002, str.
OJ C72 E, 21.3.2002, p.
336. sprejel resolucijo; obžaluje, da kvalificirana večina v Svetu ni podprla te resolucije
336. ; regrets that a qualified majority in the Council has not been able to give its approval to this resolution
25. podpira potrebo, da se v luči razvoja zadnjih desetih let pregleda statut varuha človekovih pravic, sprejet 9. marca 1994, vključno s preiskovalnimi pooblastili Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) in sprejetjem Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 o dostopu do dokumentov, ki jo je pisno predsedniku Patu Coxu 17. decembra 2002 predlagal g.
Supports the need for a review of the Ombudsman's Statute, as adopted on 9 March 1994, in the light of developments during the last decade, including the powers of investigation of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 on access to documents, as proposed by Mr Söderman in a letter to President Pat Cox of 17 December 2002;
26. priznava dobre delovne odnose med uradom varuha človekovih pravic in odborom za peticije, vključno s postopkom medsebojnega prenosa primerov, ko je to primerno, zaradi česar se je šest pritožb posredovalo neposredno na odbor, 142 nadaljnjim pritožnikom pa se je svetovalo, da vložijo peticijo;
Acknowledges the good working relationship between the Ombudsman's office and the Comittee on Petitions, including a process of mutual transfer of cases where appropriate, which led to six complaints being transferred directly to that Committee and a further 142 complainants being advised to submit petitions;
29. svetuje svojemu predsedniku, da to resolucijo in poročilo posreduje Komisiji, Svetu, evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, vladam in parlamentom držav članic in varuhom človekovih pravic ali enakovrednim organom v državah članicah.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report to the Commission, the Council, the European Ombudsman, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the ombudsmen or equivalent bodies in the Member States.
Letno poročilo o delu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2003
The annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman for the year 2003
člena 112(1) in 195(2)
Rule 112(1) and 195(2)
Predlog(-i) resolucij(-e), vključeni v poročilo
Motion(s) for resolution(s) included in report
o predlogu uredbe Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2667/2000 o Evropski agenciji za obnovo
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) N° 2667/2000 on the European Agency for Reconstruction
o predlogu uredbe Sveta , ki spreminja Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2667/2000 o Evropski agenciji za obnovo
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2667/2000 on the European Agency for Reconstruction
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2004)0451 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0451 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 181a, drugega odstavka, prvega stavka Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0075/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 181 a, second paragraph, first sentence of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0075/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6‑0031/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0031/2004 ),
Uvodna izjava 7 a (novo)
Recital (7 a) (new)
(7a) ker za vse spremembe v zvezi s pristojnostmi agencije, ki bi presegale trenutno veljavne določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 2667/2000, zlasti člene 1, 2 in 15, velja, da se sprožijo ustrezni proračunski postopki.
(7a) Whereas any changes to the Agency's remit, beyond what is currently stated in Regulation (EC) No 2667/2000, particularly Articles 1, 2 and 15 therof, are also subject to the relevant budgetary procedures.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 4
ARTICLE 1, POINT 4
Člen 14 (Uredba (ES) št. 2667/2000)
Article 14 (Regulation (EC) No 2667/2000)
Člen 14 se črta .
Article 14 is repealed.
Člen 14 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 14 shall be replaced by the following:
"Komisija do junija 2005 Svetu predloži poročilo o prihodnosti agencije po 31. decembru 2006."
‘The Commission shall, by June 2005, submit to the Council a report dealing with the future of the Agency after 31 December 2006.’
Jugovzhodna Evropa za Evropsko unijo predstavlja pomembno regijo.
South-east Europe is a key region for the Union.
Parlament se ne more strinjati z negotovo prihodnostjo Evropske agencije za obnovo.
Parliament cannot allow the future of the European Agency for Reconstruction to be left in doubt.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 5
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5
Člen 15 (Uredba (ES) št. 2667/2000)
Article 15 (Regulation (EC) No 2667/2000)
Člen 15 se nadomesti tako:
Article 15 is replaced by:
Člen 15 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 15 shall be replaced by the following :
"Komisija lahko agencijo pooblasti za izvajanje podpore Skupnosti, namenjeni Srbiji in Črni gori ter Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1628/96."
" The Commission may delegate to the Agency the execution of the Community assistance decided upon for Serbia and Montenegro and for the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia under Regulation (EC) No 1628/96."
"Komisija lahko agencijo pooblasti za izvajanje podpore Skupnosti, namenjeni Srbiji in Črni gori ter Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1628/96."
" The Commission may delegate to the Agency the execution of the Community assistance decided upon for Serbia and Montenegro and for the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia under Regulation (EC) No 1628/96.
Komisija lahko agenciji dodeli izvajanje podpore za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja turške ciprske skupnosti v okviru Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. xx/2004."
The Commission may entrust the Agency with the implementation of assistance for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community within the framework of Council Regulation (EC) No xx/2004."
ČLEN l, ODSTAVEK 5 A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5 A (new)
Člen 15 a (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 2667/2000)
Article 15 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 2667/2000)
(5a) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
5a The following Article 15a shall be inserted:
"Člen 15a
"Article 15a
V interesu še večje jasnosti in preglednosti Komisija najkasneje do 31. decembra 2004 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poda natančno poročilo, ki prikazuje razdelitev nalog med operativne centre agencije in "dekoncentrirane" delegacije Komisije v zadevnih regijah, princip te razdelitve in analizo, kako razdelitev deluje v praksi v vseh zadevnih državah, zlasti pa v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji v luči njene prošnje za članstvo v EU.
In the interests of further clarity and transparency, the Commission shall, by 31 December 2004 at the latest, provide a detailed report to the European Parliament and the Council, setting out the distribution of tasks between the operational centres of the Agency and the "deconcentrated" Commission delegations in the respective regions, explaining the rationale behind this allocation and giving an analysis of how the allocation is working in practice for all the countries concerned and, in particular, for the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in the light of its application for EU membership."
Na splošno se zdi, da Agencija deluje učinkovito na področju upravljanja z glavnimi programi pomoči ES v regiji.
Generally speaking, the Agency appears to be working effectively in its task of managing the main EC assistance programmes in the region.
Vendar pa, kot je zahteval že prejšnji Parlament - in še ni dobil odgovora od Komisije - bi poročilo Komisije, ki jasno prikazuje, kako so razdeljene naloge/pristojnosti med operativne centre Agencije in urade delegacij Komisije (ki jih zdaj imenujemo "dekoncentrirane" delegacije), ki delujejo na zadevnih območjih, skupaj z analizo, kako dobro (ali slabo) deluje to usklajevanje, pomenilo velik korak proti razjasnitvi nekaterih težav, ki še naprej motijo določene vidike dela Agencije.
However, as already requested by the last Parliament - and not yet responded to by the Commission -, provision by the Commission of a report setting out clearly how tasks/responsibilites are divided up between the Agency's centres of operation and the Commission's delegation offices (now referred to as "deconcentrated" delegations) covering the respective areas, together with an analysis of how well (or otherwise) this regulation is working, would go a long way towards clarifying certain difficulties which have continued to hamper some aspects of the Agency's work.
Predlog uredbe Sveta , ki spreminja Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2667/2000 o Evropski agenciji za obnovo
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) N° 2667/2000 on the European Agency for Reconstruction
člen 181a(2), prvi stavek ES
Article 181 a, paragraph 2, first sentence EC
člena 51 in 134
Rule 51 and Rule 134
Odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o instrumentu finančne podpore za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja turške ciprske skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community
José Albino Silva Peneda
José Albino Silva Peneda , Committee on Budgets
(*) Okrepljeno sodelovanje med odbori - člen 47
(*) Enhanced cooperation between committees – Rule 47
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUN.......................................................................................9
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets ...................................................................9
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2004)0465 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0465 )
Še ni bilo objavljeno v UL. in spremenjenega predloga ( KOM(2004)0696 )
Not yet published in OJ and the amended proposal ( COM(2004)0696 )
2 Še ni bilo objavljeno v UL 2
Not yet published in OJ ,
– ob upoštevanju osnutka uredbe Sveta (13195/2004),
– having regard to the draft Council regulation (13195/2004),
– ob upoštevanju člena 308 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0098/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0098/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6-0032/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0032/2004 ),
3. poziva Komisijo, naj svoj predlog ustrezno spremeni v skladu s členom 250(2) Pogodbe ES;
Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;
Uvodna izjava 1
Recital 1
(1) Evropski svet stalno poudarja svojo prednostno naklonjenost pristopu združenega Cipra.
(1) The European Council has repeatedly underlined its strong preference for accession by a reunited Cyprus.
Do zdaj še ni prišlo do celovite rešitve.
As yet, a comprehensive settlement has not been reached.
(1) Evropski svet in Evropski parlament stalno poudarjata svojo prednostno naklonjenost pristopu združenega Cipra.
(1) The European Council and the European Parliament have repeatedly underlined their strong preference for accession by a reunited Cyprus.
Tako kot Svet je tudi EP v več resolucijah jasno izrazil, da je močno naklonjen pristopu združenega Cipra.
Like Council the EP has also made clear in several resolutions that it strongly favours the accession of a reunited Cyprus
Predlog spremembe 2
Amendment 2
Uvodna izjava 4 a (novo)
Recital 4 a (new)
Evropski parlamenta od Sveta zahteva, da čimprej sprejme pošteno in pravično odločitev glede vprašanja trgovinskih odnosov.
(4a)The European Parliament requires the Council to reach a fair and just decision on the issue of trade relations as soon as possible
Predlog spremembe 3
Amendment 3
Člen 3, odstavek 2
Article 3, Paragraph 2
Komisiji bo pomagal odbor, ki ga določa člen 9(1) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3906/89, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic in mu predseduje predstavnik Komisije.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee provided for in Article 9 (1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89, composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by a representative of the Commission.
Komisiji bo pomagal odbor, ki ga določa člen 9(1) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3906/89, ki ga sestavljajo po en predstavnik iz vsake države članice in mu predseduje predstavnik Komisije.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee provided for in Article 9 (1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89, composed of one representative from each Member State and chaired by a representative of the Commission.
Vsaka država članica bi morala imeti po enega predstavnika, da se olajša sprejemanje odločitev odbora.
Member States should have one representative each in order to facilitate the decision-making of the committee.
Predlog spremembe 4
Amendment 4
Člen 5, odstavek 1
Article 5, paragraph 1
Delovanje v okviru te uredbe mora biti usklajeno s pravili, določenimi v Naslovu IV drugega dela Uredbe Sveta 1605/2002.
Actions under this regulation shall be implemented according to the rules set down in Title IV of part 2 of Council Regulation 1605/2002.
Vse pravne obveznosti, povezane s pomočjo, ki jo določa ta uredba, morajo biti zaključene najkasneje v treh letih po datumu obveznosti v breme proračuna.
All individual legal commitments relating to assistance under this Regulation shall be concluded no later than three years following the date of the budgetary commitment.
Delovanje v okviru te uredbe mora biti usklajeno s pravili, določenimi v Uredbi Sveta 1605/2002.
Actions under this regulation shall be implemented according to the rules set down in Council Regulation 1605/2002.
Ker je Naslov IV finančne uredbe "Zunanji ukrepi", bi ta omemba vnaprej določila odločitev proračunskega organa.
Because Title IV of the Financial Regulation is "External Actions", this reference would pre-empt the decision of the budgetary authority.
Člen 5 b (novo)
Article 5 b (new)
Člen 5b
Article 5b
Vsake spremembe pristojnosti agencije, ki presegajo trenutno veljavne določitve Uredbe Sveta ES 2667/2000 z dne 5.decembra 2000, so predmet ustreznih proračunskih postopkov.
(5b) Any changes to the Agency's mandate, beyond what is currently stated in Council Regulation (EC) 2667/2000 of 5 December 2000, are also subject to the relevant budgetary procedures.'
Člen 6 a (novo)
Article 6 a (new)
Člen 6a
Article 6a
Pri vsakem projektu, financiranem v okviru te uredbe, se preveri, ali so kršene lastninske pravice državljanov EU.
(6a) Any project financed under this Regulation shall be examined in such a way as to establish that it does not impinge upon the property rights of any EU citizen.
Predlog spremembe 7
Amendment 7
Vsako leto Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu pošlje poročilo o porabi pomoči Skupnosti v okviru tega instrumenta.
Each year the Commission shall send to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the implementation of Community assistance under this instrument.
Poročilo mora vsebovati informacije o dejavnostih, financiranih v tem letu, in o ugotovitvah nadzornega dela ter oceno doseženih rezultatov na podlagi porabe pomoči.
The report shall contain information on the actions financed during the year and on the findings of monitoring work, and shall give an assessment of the results achieved in the implementation of the assistance.
Do 1. maja vsako leto Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu pošlje poročilo o porabi pomoči Skupnosti v okviru tega instrumenta v prejšnjem letu .
By 1 May of each year the Commission shall send to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the implementation of Community assistance under this instrument in the previous year .
Poročilo mora vsebovati informacije o dejavnostih, financiranih v tem letu, in o ugotovitvah nadzornega dela ter oceno doseženih rezultatov na podlagi porabe pomoči.
The report shall contain information on the actions financed during that year and on the findings of monitoring work, and shall give an assessment of the results achieved in the implementation of the assistance.
Poročilo bi moralo biti na razpolago pred prvo obravnavo proračuna za naslednje leto, da se lahko reagira na rezultate porabe.
This report should be available before the 1st reading of the budget of the following year, in order to be able to react to the implementation results.
Predlog spremembe 8
Amendment 8