natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kot poudarja Komisija, lahko države članice v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2792/1999 z dne 17. decembra 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil in sporazumov glede strukturne pomoči Skupnosti v ribiškem sektorju ribičem in lastnikom plovil izplačajo nadomestila za začasno prekinitev dejavnosti v primerih ko sporazum o ribolovu za flote Skupnosti, ki so odvisne od sporazuma, ni obnovljen ali je začasno prekinjen.
As the Commission points out, under Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector, the Member States may grant compensation to fishermen and owners of vessels for the temporary cessation of activities where a fisheries agreement is not renewed, or where it is suspended, for the Community fleets dependent on the agreement.
Izplačevanje nadomestila ne sme trajati dlje od šestih mesecev in se lahko podaljša za nadaljnjih šest mesecev, če se za zadevno floto izvaja načrt preoblikovanja, ki ga je odobrila Komisija.
The granting of compensation may not last longer than six months, and may be extended by a further six months provided a conversion plan approved by the Commission is implemented for the fleet concerned.
Ta plovila so to možnost izkoristila prek programa pomoči zaradi šestmesečne začasne prekinitve dejavnosti, ki se je začela avgusta 2004.
These fishing vessels have benefited from this possibility through an aid scheme for a six-month tie-up which started in August 2004.
Komisija je 18. julija 2005 ta program pomoči podaljšala za nadaljnjih šest mesecev z odobritvijo načrta preoblikovanja, ki so ga španske oblasti predložile za ribiška plovila, ki jih je prizadela neobnovitev sporazuma, v okviru operativnega programa finančnega instrumenta za usmerjanje ribištva (FIUR) v zvezi s strukturnimi posegi Skupnosti v ribiški sektor za regije cilja I v Španiji za obdobje 2000-2006.
On 18 July 2005 the Commission extended this aid scheme for a further six months by approving the conversion plan submitted by the Spanish authorities for fishing vessels affected by the non-renewal of the agreement, within the framework of the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG) operational programme relating to Community structural interventions in the fisheries sector for Objective 1 in Spain during the period 2000-2006.
Komisija meni, da je za lažje izvajanje tega načrta preoblikovanja zaželeno, da so ribiška plovila Skupnosti, ki so vključena v ta načrt, izvzeta iz nekaterih določb Uredbe (ES) št. 2792/1999.
In order to facilitate the implementation of the conversion plan, the Commission considers it desirable for fishing vessels covered by the plan to be exempted from certain provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999.
Komisija zato predlaga naslednja odstopanja:
The Commission is therefore proposing that the following derogations be granted:
- za ribiška plovila, ki se odločijo pluti pod zastavo Angole se opusti obstoječa obveznost povrnitve javne pomoči za izgradnjo, obnovo, opremo in začasno prekinitev;
- for fishing vessels which decide to switch to the Angolan flag: the existing obligation to reimburse public aid for construction, renewal and equipment and for temporary tie-up should be waived;
- za ribiška plovila, ki izberejo pomoč za trajno prekinitev dejavnosti se opusti obveznost prikaza neprekinjenega opravljanja dejavnosti v letu pred izbrisom iz registra ribiških plovil Skupnosti.
- for fishing vessels which opt for permanent withdrawal aid: the obligation to demonstrate continuous activity in the year preceding the deletion from the Community fishing vessel register should be waived.
Kot poudarja Komisija, je poleg izgube možnosti za ribolov, delovnih mest in dodane vrednosti, povezane s poprejšnjim izvajanjem dejavnosti, posledica odpovedi sporazuma tudi preusmeritev plovil Skupnosti, ki so odvisna od ribolova v vodah Angole.
As the Commission points out, apart from the loss of fishing opportunities, jobs and added value linked to the activities previously carried out, denouncing the agreement entails the conversion of Community fishing vessels dependent on fishing in Angolan waters.
Poročevalec zato obžaluje, da ni bilo možno doseči dogovora med Skupnostjo in angolskimi oblastmi.
For this reason, the rapporteur regrets that it was not possible to reach an agreement between the Community and the Angolan authorities.
Poročevalec meni, da je eno od ključnih vprašanj kako najti alternativne dejavnosti za plovila, ki jih je prizadela odpoved sporazuma, in s tem ohraniti delovna mesta, ki so odvisna od teh dejavnosti.
The rapporteur takes the view that one of the key questions is to find alternative activities for the vessels affected by the denunciation of the agreement, preserving the jobs which depend on those activities.
Po mnenju Komisije načrt preoblikovanja za ta plovila ponuja več priložnosti: zadevna plovila lahko prestopijo k opravljanju dejavnosti v okviru drugih sporazumov o ribolovu ali pa se jih izbriše iz registra ribiških plovil Skupnosti tako, da se jih razreže oziroma da začnejo pluti pod drugo zastavo.
According to the Commission, the conversion plan for these vessels offers several opportunities: the vessels in question may switch to operating under other fisheries agreements, or they may be removed from the Community fishing vessel register by means of scrapping or changing flag.
Vendar pa Komisija poudarja, da lahko v tem primeru nekatere določbe v zvezi z dodeljevanjem finančne podpore zadevnim plovilom v okviru FIUR ovirajo njihovo preoblikovanje kot del tega načrta.
In the present case, however, as the Commission points out, some of the provisions relating to the granting of financial support under the FIFG to the vessels concerned may hinder their conversion as part of this plan.
Poročevalcu se zato zdi primerno, da se sprejme ukrepe za olajšanje in spodbuditev preoblikovanja teh ribiških plovil, kot je predlog, da tem plovilom ni treba izpolnjevati določenih določb, zlasti obveznosti vrnitve pomoči za gradnjo ali posodobitev, ki so jo prejele v preteklih desetih letih, skupaj s pomočjo za začasno prekinitev dejavnosti, ki jim je bila dodeljena v okviru FIUR.
The rapporteur therefore considers it appropriate to adopt measures to facilitate and promote the conversion of these fishing vessels, such as the proposal to make these vessels exempt from complying with certain provisions, in particular the obligation to reimburse aid for construction or modernisation received in the previous ten years, along with aid for the temporary cessation of activities granted under the FIFG.
Poročevalec meni, da bi bilo treba izvesti podrobno študijo vseh izvedljivih možnosti, ki bi zadevnim plovilom omogočale opravljanje dejavnosti na drugih območjih ali v okviru drugih sporazumov o ribolovu, pogajanje o novih možnostih ribolova ali že obstoječih možnosti, ki se jih ne izrablja.
The rapporteur takes the view that a detailed study should be made of all viable possibilities allowing the vessels concerned to operate in other areas or under other fisheries agreements, negotiating new fishing opportunities or taking advantage of possibilities which already exist but are not being used.
Treba bi bilo tudi upoštevati možnost, da bi plovila ostala v Angoli v okviru angolske nacionalne zakonodaje, zlasti z ustanavljanjem skupnih podjetij.
Consideration should also be given to the possibility for the vessels to remain in Angola, within the framework of Angola's national legislation, particularly through the creation of joint enterprises.
Ta možnost je, kot poudarja Komisija, združljiva s SRP, zlasti pa s smernicami za pogajanja o partnerskih sporazumih na področju ribištva.
As the Commission points out, this option is compatible with the CFP and, in particular, with the guidelines for the negotiation of fisheries partnership agreements.
Po mnenju poročevalca bi si bilo treba prizadevati, da bi se izognili razrezu teh plovil, ki bi pomenil izgubo vloženega kapitala, brezposelnost in dodatne stroške.
In the rapporteur’s view, efforts should be made to avoid scrapping these vessels, which would represent a loss of invested capital, unemployment and additional expenditure.
V primeru, da bi bila ta možnost sprejeta, bi bilo treba poskrbeti za dodelitev pomoči, do katere bi bili upravičeni lastniki plovil in prizadeti delavci, kot je predvideno v FIUR.
If this option were to be adopted, provision would have to be made for granting the aid to which the vessel owners and workers affected would be entitled, as envisaged in the FIFG.
Seveda se bodo o tem, katera rešitev je za plovila in ohranitev delovnih mest najboljša, odločale španske oblasti.
It will of course be for the Spanish authorities to consider what is the best solution for the vessels and for preserving jobs.
Glede na trenutne razmere poročevalec meni, da je za izogib prizadetju plovil in delavcev priporočljivo obnoviti kompenzacijsko shemo za začasne prekinitve, zlasti njeno trajanje in njen vir financiranja.
In the light of the current situation, the rapporteur considers it advisable to review the compensation scheme for temporary tie-ups, particularly its duration and the source of funding, in order to prevent any harm to vessels and workers.
Poročevalec glede skupnih podjetij ali drugih oblik mešanih družb s tretjimi državami nima nobenih zadržkov, pod pogojem, da ta temeljijo na resničnih projektih sodelovanja, ki prinašajo koristi obema stranema, in da ne spodbujajo preseljevanja ribiških flot in industrije držav Skupnosti, kar bi za seboj pustilo izgube delovnih mest in gospodarskih dejavnosti, ki potekajo pred samim ribolovom in po njem.
With regard to joint enterprises or other forms of joint venture with third countries, the rapporteur has no reservations provided that they are based on genuine, mutually advantageous cooperation projects and do not encourage the relocation of Community countries’ fishing fleets and industry, with the loss of jobs and economic activities upstream and downstream which this would entail.
Poročevalec glede tega meni, da bi Komisija lahko predstavila študijo trenutnih razmer glede skupnih podjetij in drugih oblik mešanih družb s tretjimi državami na področju ribištva.
On this issue, the rapporteur shares the view that the Commission might present a study on the current situation regarding joint enterprises and other forms of joint venture with third countries in the field of fisheries.
Poročevalec meni, da bi si bilo treba prizadevati za zagotovitev neprekinjenega opravljanja dejavnosti zadevnih ribiških plovil in za zagotovitev ohranitve delovnih mest, ki so odvisna od teh dejavnosti, ter da bi bilo treba za to preučiti vse možnosti.
To sum up, the rapporteur takes the view that efforts should be made to ensure continuous activity for the fishing vessels concerned and to guarantee the preservation of jobs depending on those activities, and that all the relevant possibilities should be explored.
Da bi pripomogli k doseganju tega cilja, bi morala ta plovila po mnenju poročevalca izkoristiti odstopanja od določenih določb FIUR, predlaganih v obstoječem predlogu uredbe.
In order to help achieve this objective, the rapporteur takes the view that these vessels should benefit from the derogations from certain provisions of the FIFG proposed in the present draft regulation.
Glede na zgoraj omenjeno poročevalec meni, da bi moral Odbor za ribištvo odobriti predložene predloge.
In the light of the above, the rapporteur takes the view that the Committee on Fisheries should approve the proposals presented.
Ta predlog Komisije se precej razlikuje od večine predlogov v zvezi s sporazumi o ribolovu s tretjimi državami, saj EU namesto napovedi podaljšanja obstoječega ali sklenitve novega protokola odpoveduje sporazum z Angolo, ki je začel veljati leta 1987.
This proposal from the Commission is rather different from most that concern fisheries agreements with third countries - instead of announcing an extension or new protocol, the EU is denouncing the agreement with Angola that began in 1987.
Zadnji protokol k temu sporazumu je EU omogočal ribolov kozic, drugih pridnenih vrst in tuna.
The most recent protocol for that agreement allowed EU access to fishing for shrimp, other demersal species and tuna.
Nov pravni okvir, ki ga je Angola sprejela oktobra 2004, določa, da se ribolovne dejavnosti, ki sodijo pod Sporazum med Skupnostjo in Angolo, opravlja v skladu z angolskimi zakoni in predpisi o ribolovu.
The new legislative framework adopted by Angola in October 2004 stipulates that the fishing activities subject to an Agreement between the Community and Angola shall be carried out in conformity with Angola 's laws and regulations concerning fisheries.
V skladu z novim angolskim Zakonom o bioloških vodnih virih bi bilo vse ribolovne dejavnosti treba opravljati skupaj z angolskimi podjetji in bi moral biti izvor rib angolski.
In accordance with the new Angolan Law on Biological Aquatic Resources, all fishing activities would have to be carried out in association with Angolan enterprises and t he origin of the fish would have to be Angolan.
V primeru tuna bi bili ulovi po pravilih Mednarodne komisije za ohranitev atlantskega tuna (ICCAT) registrirani kot angolski ulovi.
In the case of tuna, the catches would be registered under ICCAT rules as Angolan catches.
Poleg tega bi morala biti vsa plovila ES opremljena s satelitskimi sledilnimi napravami, ki bi bile neposredno povezane z angolskim centrom za spremljanje ribiških plovil (sledenje obalne države namesto države zastave).
Furthermore, all EC vessels would have to be fitted with satellite tracking devices directly linked to the Angolan fishing vessel monitoring centre (tracking by coastal state in stead of flag state).
Komisija je ugotovila, da ti pogoji niso bili združljivi s potrebami EU in tako so bila pogajanja odložena, Komisija pa sedaj želi odpovedati prvotni sporazum.
The Commission considered that these conditions were incompatible with the needs of the EU so negotiations were suspended and the Commission now wishes to denounce the original agreement.
Za proračun Skupnosti to pomeni, da od sedaj 15,5 milijonov evrov, kolikor znaša letno plačilo Angoli, ne bo več vključeno v proračun.
The impact of this to the Community budget amounts to €15.5 million, the amount of annual payment to Angola that will no longer be included in the budget.
Vendar pa velja preučiti še en proračunski vidik.
However, there is another budgetary aspect that deserves consideration.
V okviru sporazuma z Angolo je delovalo nekaj španskih plovil, ki so lovila kozice.
A number of Spanish vessels were active under the Angolan agreement, fishing for shrimp.
Veliko teh plovil je bilo posebej zgrajenih za ribolov v angolskih vodah in je za izgradnjo prejelo subvencije EU, nekatera izmed njih prav pred kratkim, tj. leta 2002 oz.
Many of these were specifically built to fish in Angolan waters and benefited from EU subsidies for their construction, some as recently as 2002 or 2003.
Mnoga so zato prejela javno pomoč v okviru FIUR za začasno prekinitev ribolovne dejavnosti, najprej za obdobje 6 mesecev in nato, po sprejetju programa za preusmeritev, še za nadaljnjih 6 mesecev (Člen 16 Uredbe 2792/1999).
Consequently, many received public aid under the FIFG for temporary cessation of fishing activities, first for a period of 6 months and then, following the adoption of a reconversion programme, a further period of 6 months (Article 16 of Regulation 2792/1999).
Lastniki teh plovil sedaj iščejo druge možnosti, med katerimi bi v poštev prišli razrez, vključitev v druge sporazume o ribolovu ali pa da začnejo pluti pod angolsko zastavo in nadaljujejo z ribolovom v angolskih vodah.
The owners of these vessels are now looking for alternatives, which could include being scrapped, being included in another fisheries agreement or else being transferred to the Angolan flag to continue fishing in Angolan waters.
V skladu z običajnimi določbami FIUR bi bilo treba to pomoč pod določenimi pogoji vrniti.
Under the normal provisions of the FIFG, these aids would have to be reimbursed under certain conditions.
Če bi bilo na primer neko plovilo prepisano v angolski register, bi moral njegov lastnik praviloma vrniti del pomoči, ki jo je prejel za izgradnjo plovila.
For instance, if a vessel is transferred to the Angolan registry, its owner would normally have to pay back part of the aid received for the vessel's construction.
Hkrati bi bilo treba vrniti tudi del nadomestila za začasno prekinitev ribolovne dejavnosti.
Some of the compensation for temporary cessation of fishing activities would also have to be paid back.
Komisija predlaga podelitev odstopanja od tega pravila za tista plovila, ki se jih bo izvozilo v Angolo.
The Commission is proposing to grant a derogation for those vessels that are exported to Angola.
Želja lastnikov plovil, da prejetih subvencij ne bi vračali, je sicer razumljiva, ni pa jasno, ali bi bil takšen precedens sploh zaželen.
While the desire of the ship-owners not to repay the subsidies they have received is understandable, it is not clear that this is a precedent that should be welcomed.
Lastniki plovil so pomoč Skupnosti prejeli za izgradnjo plovil, ki so posebej namenjena ribolovu v angolskih vodah.
The ship-owners received Community aid to build vessels specifically to fish in Angolan waters.
Tu se postavlja vprašanje o tem, kakšna zagotovila so bila dana EU glede odgovornega ribolova teh plovil, ko bodo plula pod novo zastavo?
This raises the question of what kind of assurances the EU has been given that these vessels will fish responsibly under their new flag?
Kako je EU ob odsotnosti dvostranskega sporazuma lahko prepričana, da ta plovila ne bodo lovila izlovljenih staležev rib, da bodo njihove dejavnosti ustrezno nadzorovane itd.
If there is no bilateral agreement, how can the EU be certain that they will not be exploiting depleted fish stocks, that their activities will be properly monitored, etc.?
Ali je Komisija zagotovila obstoj ustreznega in delujočega institucionalnega okvira v Angoli, ki bo sposoben prevzeti do 14 sorazmerno novih ribiških plovil, ne da bi ob tem prišlo do prevelike izrabe ribolovnih virov ter nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova?
Has the Commission ensured that there is a proper and functioning institutional framework in Angola to absorb up to 14 relatively new fishing vessels without leading to over-exploitation and IUU fishing?
V tem primeru se zdi relevanten Mednarodni akcijski načrt FAO za upravljanje ribolovne zmogljivosti.
The FAO International Plan of Action for the Management of Fishing Capacity would appear to be relevant here.
Treba je upoštevati tudi merila, ki jih je oblikovala Komisija, da bi plovilom preprečili, da začnejo pluti pod zastavo ugodnosti.
The Commission has also established criteria to prevent the transfer of vessels to flags of convenience that must be respected.
Poročevalec ob upoštevanju odgovorov Komisije na ta vprašanja priporoča, da se predlog sprejme v takšni obliki, kot je bil prejet.
Subject to the answers the Commission provides to these questions, your rapporteur recommends that the proposal be adopted as received.
Predlog uredbe Sveta o odpovedi Sporazuma med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Vlado Ljudske republike Angole o ribolovu v obalnih vodah Angole in o odstopanju od Uredbe (ES) št. 2792/1999
Proposal for a Council regulation denouncing the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the People’s Republic of Angola on fisheries off Angola and derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999
Prisotnost EU na oddaljenih ribolovnih območjih je legitimen cilj, pri tem pa ne smemo pozabiti, da je treba ob interesu za razvoj narodov, s katerimi se podpisujejo sporazumi, zavarovati tudi ribiške interese Unije.
The EU presence in distant fishing grounds is a legitimate objective, and must not forget that the interest of Union's fisheries ought to be protected alongside the interest in developing the nations with whom agreements are signed.
Evropska gospodarska skupnost je z vlado Ljudske republike Angole podpisala sporazum o ribolovu, ki je nehal veljati avgusta 2004.
The European Economic Community signed an agreement on fisheries with the People's Republic of Angola that came to an end in August 2004.
Obe strani se v zaporednih krogih pogajanj nista mogli sporazumeti o glavnih načelih novega protokola.
In successive rounds of negotiations the two parties have not been able to agree on the main principles of the new Protocol.
Nov pravni okvir, ki ga je Angola sprejela oktobra 2004, določa, da se ribolovne dejavnosti, ki so predmet Sporazuma med Skupnostjo in Angolo, opravlja v skladu z angolskimi zakoni in predpisi o ribolovu.
The new legislative framework adopted by Angola in October 2004 stipulates that the fishing activities subject to an Agreement between the Community and Angola shall be carried out in conformity with Angola's laws and regulations concerning fisheries.
V skladu z novo nacionalno zakonodajo Angole, mora tuja plovila, ki opravljajo dejavnost v vodah Angole, upravljati angolska mešana družba in ulov mora biti angolskega izvora.
In accordance with the new Angolan national legislation, foreign vessels operating in Angolan waters must operate by an Angolan joint venture and the catch will be of Angolan origin.
V ta namen bi morala vsa tuja plovila, ki opravljajo dejavnost v vodah Angole, pluti pod angolsko zastavo.
To this end, all foreign vessels operating in Angolan waters would have to fly the Angolan flag.
Poleg tega bi morala biti vsa plovila ES opremljena s satelitskimi sledilnimi napravami, ki bi bile neposredno povezane z angolskim centrom za spremljanje ribiških plovil (sledenje obalne države namesto države zastave).
Furthermore, all EC vessels would have to be fitted with satellite tracking devices directly linked to the Angolan fishing vessel monitoring centre (tracking by coastal state instead of flag state).
V teh okoliščinah je Komisija Angolo junija obvestila, da so pogajanja prekinjena in se formalna odpoved Sporazuma o ribištvu po postopku, ki je določen v členu 14 Sporazuma, šteje za potrebno.
In these circumstances, the Commission has informed Angola in June that the negotiations have broken down, and it is considered necessary to formally denounce the Fisheries Agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in its Article 14.
Skupnost mora Angolo o odpovedi obvestiti do 31. oktobra 2007, da odpoved začne učinkovati 1. februarja 2008.
The Community should give notice of the denouncement to Angola by 31 October 2007, in order that denunciation takes effect on 1 February 2008.
Sprejeti so bili ukrepi s programom pomoči za pomoč plovilom, ki jih je prizadela odpoved.
Measures are being taken to help the vessels that are affected by the denunciation through an aid scheme.
Plovila, ki nameravajo ostati v Angoli, lahko ostanejo, če prestopijo pod angolsko zastavo, vendar morajo Skupnosti vrniti pomoč, ki so jo prejele, z izjemo pomoči za gradnjo in začasno ukinitev aktivnosti.
And vessels intending to stay in Angola are allowed to do it when switching flags, but having to pay back support received from the Community, with exception of the construction and tie-up aids.
Odbor za razvoj bi želel dosego sporazuma zaradi razvoja Angole, kot tudi zaradi zagotavljanja trajnostnega ribištva na ozemlju.
The Development committee would have liked for the sake of Angolan development, but also to assure sustainable fisheries in the area, that an agreement could be reached.
Ne moremo pa sprejeti dejstva, da ne bi mogli loviti rib v angolskih vodah pod zastavo države članice Unije.
But we can't accept that we can't fish in Angolan waters under our Union Member's flags.
Zato predlagamo potrditev predloga Evropske komisije.
Therefore we propose to agree with the European Commission proposal.
Poleg tega predlagamo nadaljevanje rednih stikov z angolskimi organi, tako, da se bo lahko ob prvi priložnosti pogajalo o novem sporazumu.
And further propose that contacts with Angolan authorities should be regularly kept, so that a new agreement can be negotiated at the earliest possible opportunity.