natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na področju železniškega prometa zajema Direktiva 2004/49/EG o varnosti na železnicah v Poglavju V podobne predpise kot ta predlog Komisije o pomorskem prometu.
For the railway sector, Chapter V of Directive 2004/49/EC on railway safety includes similar provisions to those on maritime transport in this Commission proposal.
Najprej je pomembno poudariti, da pri preiskavah iz tega predloga ne gre za ugotavljanje civilnopravne odgovornosti ali kazenskopravne krivde.
It is important first to state that the investigations referred to in this proposal are not concerned with determining civil liability or criminal responsibility.
Predmet osnutka direktive so tako tehnične preiskave, ki naj bi pojasnile vzroke pomorskih nezgod in omogočile, da se iz tega kaj naučimo.
The draft directive is concerned rather with technical investigations to determine the causes of accidents at sea so that lessons can be learned.
Predlog naj bi prispeval k izboljšanju pomorske varnosti z oblikovanjem okvira, ki bo zagotavljal
The proposal should contribute to improving maritime transport safety by establishing a framework to ensure
· hitre preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo,
· rapid safety investigations
· natančne analize pomorskih nezgod in incidentov ter
· careful analysis of accidents and incidents at sea
· ustrezno poročanje in po potrebi predloge za odpravo nepravilnosti.
· appropriate reporting and proposals to remedy any shortcomings.
Področje uporabe
Field of application
Direktiva ne velja le za pomorske nezgode/incidente ladij, ki plujejo pod zastavo države članice, temveč tudi za pomorske nezgode/incidente v teritorialnih vodah države članice (člen 2).
The directive applies not only to accidents and incidents at sea involving ships flying the flag of a Member State, but also to accidents and incidents in the territorial waters of a Member State (Article 2).
Jedro predloga sta člena 4 in 5, ki navajata, da morajo države članice določiti pravila za izvedbo preiskav v zvezi z varnostjo v primeru pomorske nezgode ali incidenta.
The key part of the proposal is Articles 4 and 5, which provide that Member States must lay down rules for the conduct of marine casualty or incident safety investigations, independently of any criminal or civil liability investigations, which must not hinder or delay them.
Te je treba izvajati neodvisno od preiskav, ki so usmerjene h kazenskopravnim vprašanjem ali vprašanjem odgovornosti in krivde, in jih le-te tudi ne smejo ovirati ali odložiti.
Member States must also ensure that an investigation is carried out by an investigative body after serious or very serious marine casualties.
To ne velja le takrat, ko je v nezgodi udeležena ladja, ki pluje pod zastavo te države, temveč tudi ko se nezgoda pripeti v njenih teritorialnih vodah ali kadar obstaja pomemben interes te države članice.
This applies not only when the incident involves a ship flying that country’s flag, but also if it occurs in its territorial waters or involves a substantial interest of that country.
Preiskovalni organi (člen 8)
Investigative bodies (Article 8)
Direktiva državam članicam nalaga obveznost zagotoviti, da so za navedene preiskave pristojni nepristranski stalni preiskovalni organi.
The directive establishes the Member States' duty to ensure that the investigations are carried out under the responsibility of an impartial permanent investigative body.
Biti morajo funkcijsko neodvisni od organov, ki so pristojni za odločanje o sposobnosti ladje za plovbo, certificiranje, inšpekcijski nadzor itd.
This body must be functionally independent of authorities responsible for seaworthiness, certification, port state control, etc.
Poročilo o rezultatih preiskave, ki ustreza vzorcu iz direktive (člen 14), mora biti 12 mesecev po dogodku dostopno javnosti.
A report on the results of the investigation, in accordance with guidelines included in the directive, must be published within 12 months of the incident (Article 14).
Vidiki sodelovanja
Cooperation aspects
Direktiva vsebuje več pobud za sodelovanje.
The directive includes several guidelines on cooperation.
Določa načela za sodelovanje držav članic v primeru (zelo) resne nezgode (člen 7), razen tega pa zahteva tudi okvir za stalno sodelovanje držav članic (člen 10).
It lays down principles for cooperation between Member States in the event of (very) serious accidents (Art. 7) and also calls for a framework for permanent cooperation between Member States (Art. 10).
Pojasnjuje tudi, da države članice sodelujejo s tretjimi državami in da je le-tem treba omogočiti udeležbo pri preiskavah (člen 12).
It also states clearly that the Member States must cooperate with third countries and enable them also to take part in investigations (Art. 12).
Člen 9 direktive ureja uporabo informacij, pridobljenih pri preiskavi.
Article 9 of the directive covers the use of information that has been collected in the course of an investigation.
Te so praviloma lahko na voljo le za preiskavo v zvezi z varnostjo in ne za druge namene.
This as a general rule must not be used for other purposes than the safety investigation.
Pomembne podatke je treba hraniti v skladu s členom 13.
Relevant data must be preserved in accordance with Article 13.
Komisija bo uvedla evropsko elektronsko podatkovno bazo z imenom „Evropska informacijska platforma za pomorske nezgode„ (člen 17), kamor bodo preiskovalni organi držav članic v standardizirani obliki sporočali o pomorskih nezgodah in incidentih.
The Commission will set up a European electronic database known as the ‘European Marine Casualty Information Platform’ (Art. 17), to which the Member States' investigative bodies will report maritime accidents and projects in a standardised format.
Države članice seveda lahko sprejmejo dodatne ukrepe za izboljšanje pomorske varnosti, vendar le, če so ti ukrepi v skladu s predlogom.
The Member States are of course not prevented from taking additional measures on maritime safety, as long as such measures do not conflict with the proposal.
Določiti morajo učinkovite in ustrezne sankcije za primer kršitve nacionalnih predpisov, ki bodo sprejeti na podlagi tega predloga.
They must lay down effective and proportionate penalties for infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this proposal.
Poročevalec meni, da je jedro predloga razumno in da je večina elementov popolnoma jasna.
Your rapporteur considers that the thrust of the proposal is sensible and that most elements are immediately clear.
Zlasti pomembne se mu zdijo naslednje točke:
The following points seem particularly important.
· Čeprav je razumljiv odziv javnosti, da v primeru pomorske nezgode postavlja vprašanja v zvezi z odgovornostjo, je iz varnostnega vidika ločevanje od kazenskopravnih preiskav, ki je utemeljeno v predlogu, neobhodno potreben element, če se želimo iz dogodka kaj naučiti.
· Even though the understandable public reaction to an accident at sea is to ask who was responsible, from a safety point of view the proposal's separation of safety from criminal investigations is an essential element, if we are to learn lessons from incidents.
Poročevalec je tudi mnenja, da je Komisija v členu 1 oblikovala ustrezno formulacijo, po kateri se lahko tu omenjene raziskave vprašanja odgovornosti in krivde dotaknejo le, ko je to potrebno za doseganje cilja te direktive.
Your rapporteur certainly takes the view that the Commission in Article 1 has found an appropriate formulation of the concept that investigations under this proposal will not be concerned with determining liability or apportioning blame, except so far as is necessary to achieve the objective of the investigation.
Popolno črtanje te možnosti, kar predlagata Združenje ladjarjev Evropske skupnosti (ECSA) in Mednarodna pomorska zbornica (ICS), je po mnenju poročevalca pretirano in bi preiskovalne organe preveč omejilo.
Completely ruling out this possibility, as suggested by the European Community Shipowners' Association (ECSA) and the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), would in your rapporteur's view go too far and restrict the investigative bodies too much.
Podobno velja za člen 9 (nerazkritje evidenc), v skladu s katerim so tam navedene informacije lahko za druge namene in ne le za preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo na voljo le, če pristojni sodni organ države odloči, da prednosti razkritja prevladajo nad negativnimi učinki za to preiskavo ali naslednje preiskave.
The same is true for Article 9 (Non-disclosure of records) which states that information can only made available for purposes other than the safety investigation if the appropriate judicial authority in that State determines that the advantage of disclosure outweighs the adverse impact on that investigation or on any future investigations.
Tudi tu se ECSA in ICS zavzemata za črtanje tega pogoja.
The ECSA and ICS are also in favour of deleting this exclusion.
Poročevalec tega pomisleka proti morebitnem odločanju sodnih organov ne sprejema, ker formulacija Komisije pomeni smiselno ravnovesje interesov.
Your rapporteur does not share these doubts about a possible decision by the judicial authorities; the Commission proposal represents a sensible balance of interests.
· Druga osrednja točka je ustanovitev stalnega preiskovalnega organa in njegova ločitev od organov, ki imajo na pomorskem področju druge pristojnosti.
· The second key point is the establishment of a permanent investigative body and its separation from authorities with other responsibilities in the maritime area.
Razen tega tudi ne dvomi o smiselnosti stroge funkcionalne neodvisnosti tega organa.
It is also undoubtedly logical that this body should be strictly functionally independent.
Poročevalec meni, da so tehnične preiskave nezgod neobhodno potrebne na vseh področjih industrije in prometa ter zaradi tega opozarja, da je potrebna tudi ustrezna ureditev rečnega prometa.
Your rapporteur considers that the technical investigation of accidents in all areas of industry and transport is essential, he therefore points out that appropriate rules are also needed for transport on inland waterways.
Poročevalec se je v svojih prizadevanjih, da si ustvari celovito sliko vidikov predloga Komisije, med drugim posvetoval z EMSA in več državami članicami.
In his efforts to gain a comprehensive picture of all aspects of the Commission proposal, your rapporteur has made contact with bodies including the EMSA and a number of Member States.
Tudi EMSA poudarja pomen tega predloga direktive.
The EMSA also underlines the need for this draft directive.
V pogovoru z državami članicami je poročevalec dobil vtis, da mnenje o tem predlogu še ni izoblikovano.
With regard to the Member States, your rapporteur gained the impression that they are still forming their opinions on this proposal.
Od držav članic ni dobil konkretnih pripomb o predlogu Komisije.
He did not receive any specific comments from them on the Commission proposal.
To je pripisati dejstvu, da imajo ostali predlogi paketa o pomorski varnosti zdaj v državah članicah tako kot tudi v Svetu prednost.
Possibly this is because other parts of the maritime safety package currently take priority, as also in the Council.
Razumljivo je, da države članice ne morejo istočasno in z enako intenzivnostjo obravnavati vseh sedmih predlogov iz pomorskega paketa.
It is understandable that the Member States cannot consider all of the seven proposals in the maritime package simultaneously with the same intensity.
Poročevalec vendarle upa, da predlog o preiskavah pomorskih nezgod ne bo prišel na vrsto šele po drugih predlogih.
Nevertheless your rapporteur hopes that the proposal on investigation of accidents at sea will not always be ranked lower than the other proposals.
Zaželeno je, da finsko in nemško predsedstvo Sveta začneta obravnavati ta predlog.
The Finnish and German Council Presidencies should take up this dossier.
Poročevalec meni, da bi bilo koristno imeti več časa za posvetovanje z zadevnimi stranmi.
Your rapporteur considers that somewhat more time for consultation of those affected would have been useful.
Vseeno je prepričan, da je pomembno predlog Komisije obravnavati istočasno z drugimi deli pomorskega paketa.
Nevertheless he considers it important that this Commission proposal is discussed at the same time as the other components of the maritime package.
Poročilo zato vsebuje le nekaj predlogov sprememb, saj do zdaj še ni zasledil pomembnejših slabosti predloga Komisije.
Your rapporteur is therefore tabling this report now and with only a few amendments, as he has so far not discovered any major shortcomings in the Commission proposal.
Razen tega poročevalec vlaga dva predloga sprememb v zvezi s pred kratkim sprejetimi smernicami IMO o pravičnem obravnavanju mornarjev pri pomorskih nezgodah.
Your rapporteur has also tabled two amendments on the recently-adopted IMO guidelines on the fair treatment of crews in the event of maritime accidents.
Ta priporočila za obalne države, države zastave, lastnike ladij itd. zajemajo pomembna načela tudi za tehnične preiskave in lahko okrepijo zaupanje mornarjev v te preiskave ter tako olajšajo sodelovanje med preiskovalnimi organi in posadko (glej predloga sprememb 1 in 4).
These recommendations for coastal and flag States, shipowners etc contain important principles for technical investigations as well and can increase the confidence of seafarers in such investigations and thus facilitate cooperation between investigative bodies and crews (see Amendments 1 and 4).
Poročevalec bo nadaljeval s posvetovanjem in ne izključuje možnosti, da v prihodnje vloži dodatne predloge sprememb.
Your rapporteur will continue his consultations and does not rule out tabling further amendments at a later date.
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi temeljnih načel za vodenje preiskav nesreč v sektorju pomorskega prometa in o spremembi direktiv 1999/35/ES in 2002/59/ES
Investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izboljšanju prenosljivosti pravic do dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving the portability of supplementary pension rights
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................23
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............23
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................39
OPINION of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ...40
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0507 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0507 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) ter členov 42 in 94 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0331/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 42 and 94 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0331/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6‑0080/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0080/2007 ),
Uvodna izjava
Recital 5
(5) Treba je tudi uporabiti člen 94 Pogodbe, ker so neskladja med nacionalnimi zakonodajami, ki urejajo dodatno pokojninsko zavarovanje, takšne narave, da bi lahko ovirala uresničevanje pravic do prostega gibanja delavcev kakor tudi delovanje skupnega trga.
(5) Recourse should also be had to Article 94 of the Treaty, given that the disparities between the national legislation governing supplementary pension schemes are likely to hamper both the exercise of the right of workers to freedom of movement and the operation of the internal market.
Zato je treba za izboljšanje prenosljivosti pravic do dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja delavcev, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti in znotraj iste države članice, uskladiti nekatere pogoje za pridobitev pravic do pokojnine in zbližati pravila o ohranitvi mirujočih pravic in prenosa pridobljenih pravic .
Thus, in order to improve the portability of the supplementary pension rights of workers moving within the Community and within the same Member State, certain conditions governing the acquisition of pension rights must be harmonised and the rules on the preservation of dormant rights and the transfer of acquired rights must be brought closer together .
Zato je treba za izboljšanje pravic delavcev, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti in znotraj iste države članice, uskladiti nekatere minimalne zahteve za pridobitev in ohranitev pridobljenih pravic do pokojnine odhajajočih delavcev v sistemih dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja, povezanih z delovnim razmerjem.
Thus, in order to improve the rights of workers moving within the Community and within the same Member State, provision must be made for certain minimum requirements for the establishment and preservation of the vested pension rights of outgoing workers in a supplementary pension scheme linked to an employment relationship .
(5a) Upoštevati je treba tudi naravo in posebnosti sistemov dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja, pa tudi razlike med njimi, tako znotraj držav članic kot med njimi.
(5a) Moreover, account must be taken of the characteristics and special nature of supplementary pension schemes and the way they differ within and between the Member States.
Uvajanje novih sistemov, trajnost delujočih sistemov ter pričakovanja in pravice sedanjih upravičencev je treba zadostno zaščititi.
The introduction of new schemes, the sustainability of existing schemes and the expectations and rights of current pension scheme members should be adequately protected.
Pri oblikovanju in izvajanju sistemov dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja po tej direktivi je treba upoštevati zlasti vlogo socialnih partnerjev.
This directive should also take particular account of the role of the social partners in designing and implementing supplementary pension schemes.
(5b) Ta direktiva držav članic, ki nimajo sistemov dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja, ne zavezuje k sprejetju predpisov za uvedbo takšnih sistemov.
( 5b) This directive does not oblige Member States that have no supplementary pension schemes to adopt legislation to introduce such schemes.
(5c) Ta direktiva se izvaja le za dodatno pokojnino, ki glede na predpise v posameznih pokojninskih sistemih ali nacionalni zakonodaji temeljijo na dopolnitvi pokojninske starosti ali izpolnitvi drugih pogojev.
(5c) This directive applies only to supplementary pensions which, according to the rules of the relevant pension scheme or national law, are based on reaching retirement age or fulfilling other conditions.
Ne velja za osebne pokojninske načrte brez udeležbe delodajalca, za invalidsko pokojnino in družinsko pokojnino.
It does not apply to individual pension arrangements with no employer participation or to invalidity or survivors’ pensions.
Uvodna izjava 5 d (novo)
Recital 5 d (new)
(5d) Ta direktiva zadeva vse sisteme dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja, oblikovane v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo in prakso, ki zaposlenim nudijo dodatno pokojnino, na primer pogodbe skupinskega zavarovanja, dokladne sisteme, sklenjene v eni ali več panogah ali sektorjih, sisteme s skladi ali pokojninske obljube, zajamčene s knjigovodskimi rezervacijami, ali tarifne in druge primerljive predpise.
(5d) This directive applies to all supplementary pension schemes established in conformity with national legislation and practice that offer supplementary pensions for workers, such as group insurance contracts, pay-as-you-go schemes agreed by one or more branches or sectors, funded schemes or pension promises backed by book reserves, or any collective or other comparable arrangement.
Uvodna izjava 5 e (novo)
Recital 5 e (new)
(5e) Če se ob začetku veljavnosti te direktive sistem dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja utemeljeno zaključi in s tem ni več mogoče vključevanje novih aktivnih zavarovancev, bi uvedba novih predpisov za ta sistem pomenila neupravičeno obremenitev.
(5e) If, before this directive comes into force, a decision has been taken to close a supplementary pension scheme, and therefore no new members can be accepted, the introduction of new rules could place an unjustifiable burden on the scheme.
Zato ta direktiva za opisane sisteme ne velja.
Therefore the directive should not be applicable to such schemes.
Uvodna izjava 5 f (novo)
Recital 5 f (new)
(5f) Ni namen te direktive, da bi usklajevala zakonodajo posamezne države članice v zvezi z reorganizacijskimi ukrepi in stečajnim postopkom ali da bi vplivala nanjo; zato ni pomembno, ali postopek zaradi plačilne nezmožnosti teče ali ne oziroma ali je uveden prostovoljno ali prisilno.
(5f) This directive does not aim to harmonise or affect national law on reorganisation measures and winding up proceedings; it is therefore irrelevant whether or not the proceedings are opened because of insolvency, or whether or not they are entered into voluntarily or compulsorily.
Ravno tako direktiva ne vpliva na predpise posameznih držav članic o reorganizacijskih ukrepih, opredeljenih v direktivi št. 2001/17/ES.
Similarly, it does not affect national legislation on reorganisation measures under Directive 2001/17/EC.
Ukrepi po členu 16(2) direktive št. 2003/41/ES ne veljajo za reorganizacijske ukrepe.
However, measures taken under Article 16(2) of Directive 2003/41/EC do not constitute reorganisation measures.
Uvodna izjava 5 g (novo)
Recital 5 g (new)
(5g) Ta direktiva ne zadeva predpisov o zavarovanju za primer plačilne nezmožnosti ali izravnalnih predpisov, ki ne spadajo k sistemu dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja, povezanim s pogodbo o zaposlitvi, in katerih namen je, da ščitijo pravice zaposlenih do pokojnine v primeru plačilne nezmožnosti podjetja ali sistema pokojninskega zavarovanja.
(5g) This directive should not affect any arrangements for insolvency protection or compensation arrangements which are not part of a supplementary pension scheme linked to an employment relationship and which aim to protect the pension rights of workers in the event of insolvency of the undertaking or the pension scheme.
Tudi nacionalnih pokojninskih rezervnih skladov direktiva ne zadeva.
Similarly, this directive should not affect national pension reserve funds.
(5a) Zaradi vedno večjega pomena dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja za zagotovitev življenjskega standarda v starosti v vseh državah članicah je treba izboljšati pogoje za pridobitev, ohranitev in prenos pravic.
(5a) Since supplementary retirement provision is becoming increasingly important, in all the Member States, for securing people’s standard of living in old age, the conditions for acquiring, maintaining and transferring acquired rights should be improved.
S tem je jasno izraženo, da ima projekt Komisije tudi velik socialni pomen.
This makes it clear that the Commission proposal also has a substantial degree of social significance.
Pozornosti ne bi smeli nameniti izključno izboljšanju prilagodljivosti na trgu dela, temveč tudi zagotovitvi življenjskega standarda v starosti.
The focus should not just be on improving the flexibility of labour markets, but also on the goal of securing people’s standard of living in old age.
(6) Za zagotovitev, da pogoji za pridobitev pravic do dodatne pokojnine ne posegajo v uresničevanje pravice do prostega gibanja delavcev v Evropski uniji, je treba določiti omejitve glede pogojev za pridobitev teh pravic zato, da kadar delavec uresničuje svojo pravico do prostega gibanja ali se giblje znotraj ene izmed držav članic, lahko ob koncu zaposlitve prejme primerno pokojnino.
(6) In order to ensure that the conditions for acquiring supplementary pension rights do not undermine the exercise of the right of workers to freedom of movement within the European Union, limits must be established concerning the conditions governing the acquisition of such rights so that workers, when they exercise their right to freedom of movement or move within a Member State, can receive a satisfactory pension at the end of their career.