natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ker zadnji predlog Komisije ne izpolnjuje meril, ki jih je v svoji resoluciji leta 1999 določil Parlament, in je celo v nasprotju s prepričanjem poročevalca, da je potrebna temeljita reforma za večjo poenostavljenost, pravičnost in preglednost, se je poročevalec v poročilu, sprejetem 4. julija 2006
Because this latest Commission proposal does anything but meet the criteria set out by Parliament in its 1999 resolution and is running against his own personal conviction on the need for a profound reform towards more simplicity, equity and transparency, your rapporteur in his report adopted on 4 July 2006
T6-0292/2006. , omejil na dodatke k besedilu, ki poudarjajo pomen predvidenega postopka pregledovanja.
T6-0292/2006 has limited himself to additions to the text stressing the importance of the review process to come.
V njegovih predlogih so navedeni le pogoji za pregled in vključenost Parlamenta, kot je določeno v novem medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju.
His amendments have simply indicated the conditions for the review and Parliament's involvement, as laid down in the new Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management.
Poročevalec je v poročilu poudaril tudi, da je treba sklepe dialoga na temo lastnih sredstev, ki je precej časa potekal med nacionalnimi parlamenti in Evropskim parlamentom, med pregledom ustrezno upoštevati.
In his report your rapporteur also pointed out that the conclusions of the dialogue on the own resources topic that has been led between the national parliaments and the European Parliament for some time now should be duly taken into account for the review.
Na koncu je navedel, da je nameraval rezultate dela, ki so ga skupaj opravili nacionalni parlamenti in Evropski parlament, predstaviti v prihodnjih mesecih v samoiniciativnem poročilu o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev EU.
He concluded that he intended to present the results of the work conducted jointly by the national parliaments and the European Parliament in a comprehensive own initiative report on the future of the EU's own resources in the months to come.
5 O PRIHODNOSTI LASTNIH SREDSTEV EVROPSKE UNIJE
5 ON THE FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION'S OWN RESOURCES
Priprava pregleda
Towards the review
Lord Grenfell v svojem povzetku delovne skupine 4
Lord Grenfell in his summary of Working Group 4 of the
skupnega parlamentarnega srečanja o Prihodnosti Evrope, 8.–9. maj 2005
Joint Parliamentary Meeting on the Future of Europe , 8-9 May 2005
Potreba po reformi
The need for reform
Pogajanja o novem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2007-2013 so pokazala, da obstoječi sistem lastnih sredstev Evropski uniji 25 oziroma 27 držav članic ne zagotavlja trdne in koherentne finančne podlage za izvajanje njenih političnih odločitev.
The negotiations for the new Financial Framework 2007-2013 have shown that the current system of own resources does not provide the European Union of 25 (27) Member States with a solid and coherent financial basis for implementing its political choices.
Prispevki držav članic še vedno izvirajo iz nacionalnih proračunov.
The Member States' contributions still come out of the national budgets.
Izračunani so po metodi, ki ni več pregledna, pravična in državljanom razumljiva.
They are calculated according to a method that has become increasingly obscure, unfair and impossible for the citizens to understand.
Poleg tega se o načinih obstoječega sistema odloča za zaprtimi vrati brez parlamentarnega nadzora.
Besides, the modalities of the current system are decided behind closed doors without any parliamentary control.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da prihodki EU potrebujejo korenito reformo, ki bi državam članicam preprečila izključno porabo sredstev Skupnosti na področjih, kjer imajo same največ koristi, namesto da bi denar, ki je na voljo, namenile tistim politikam, ki koristijo Evropi kot celoti in so za njeno prihodnost najpomembnejše.
Your rapporteur is deeply convinced that EU revenue needs to be thoroughly reformed in a way which prevents Member States from only wanting to spend Community funds in those areas where they themselves profit most instead of concentrating the money available on those policies beneficial to Europe as a whole and most important for its future.
Evropski svet v Bruslju decembra 2005 je Komisijo pozval, naj izvede "celovit in obsežen pregled vseh področij porabe in prihodkov EU, vključno z britanskim popustom"
The "full and wide-ranging review of all areas of EU expenditure and revenue, including the British rebate"
Vsa dosedanja prizadevanja, da bi Evropski uniji zagotovili bolj pregleden in pravičen sistem, so bila zaman.
For all past efforts to steer the Union towards a more transparent system that is fair by its own virtue have failed so far.
Sodelovanje z nacionalnimi parlamenti
Cooperation with the national parliaments
Pri preučevanju predlogov Komisije iz leta 2004
When studying the proposals made by the Commission in 2004
"Predlogi komisarke Schreyer", KOM(2004)505 in KOM(2004)501 je poročevalec prišel do zaključka, da bi se bilo treba o vsakem delu Evropskega parlamenta, ki se nanaša na temo lastnih sredstev in ima za cilj oblikovati pravičnejše, enostavnejše in preglednejše rešitve, posvetovati s parlamenti držav članic, ker so navsezadnje one tiste, ki se morajo strinjati s katerim koli predlogom.
"Schreyer proposals", COM(2004)505 and COM(2004)501 , your rapporteur came to the conclusion that any work of the European Parliament on the own resources topic with an aim to finding an equitable, simple and transparent solution would need to be done in close cooperation with the parliaments of the Member States because it was them, that in the end, would need to agree on any proposal made.
Tema o lastnih sredstvih je bila zato uvrščena na dnevni red srečanja med odborom za proračun EP in odbori za proračun nacionalnih parlamentov junija 2005.
This was why the own resources topic was put on the agenda of the June 2005 meeting of the EP Committee on Budgets with the national parliaments' budget committees.
Pozitiven odziv predstavnikov nacionalnih parlamentov glede uvrstitve točke o lastnih sredstvih na dnevni red ter zanimive in odprte razprave so ob tej priložnosti opogumile poročevalca, da nadaljuje v začrtani smeri.
The positive reaction of the representatives of the national parliaments to having the own resources item on the agenda and the interesting and open discussions led on this occasion encouraged your rapporteur to proceed in this direction.
Namen vprašalnika je bil ugotoviti, ali je mogoče oblikovati osrednja osnovna načela za reformo sistema lastnih sredstev, ki bi jih podprl Evropski parlament in reprezentativna večina parlamentov držav članic ("starih" in "novih" ter "neto plačnic" in "neto plačnic prispevkov, južnih in severnih itd.).
The objective of this questionnaire was to begin to explore whether some central basic principles for a reform of the own resources system could be established which could be supported by the European Parliament and a representative majority of the parliaments of the Member States ("old" and "new" ones, "net-payers" and "net-contributors", Southern and Northern ones, etc.).
Odzivi na vprašalnik so bili različni: nekateri parlamenti se iz različnih razlogov niso odločili za odgovarjanje, nekateri so odgovorili v pisni obliki, nekateri pa so poročevalca povabili k osebni izmenjavi mnenj.
The reactions to this questionnaire were manifold: Some parliaments, for one reason or another, chose not to reply at all, some parliaments replied in writing and some parliaments invited the rapporteur for a personal exchange of views.
Do sedaj je poročevalec izmenjal mnenja z odbori za proračun ali njihovimi predstavniki v naslednjih državah: Luksemburg, Portugalska, Finska, Francija, Nemčija, Španija, Belgija in Madžarska.
So far, the rapporteur has been given the opportunity to speak to the budget committees, or their representatives, of Luxembourg, Portugal, Finland, France, Germany, Spain, Belgium and Hungary.
Analiza pisnih odgovorov na vprašalnik ter rezultatov obojestranskih srečanj je počasi pokazala nekaj splošnih točk možnega dogovora.
In analysing the written replies to the questionnaire as well as the results of the bilateral meetings, some general points of possible agreement have slowly begun to emerge.
O teh točkah je na medparlamentarnem srečanju, ki sta ga 8. in 9 maja 2006 v Bruslju organizirala Evropski in avstrijski parlament, nadalje razpravljala delovna skupina za lastna sredstva.
These were further developed by the Working Group on Own Resources of the Interparliamentary meeting of 8 – 9 May 2006, jointly organised by the European Parliament and the Austrian Parliament in Brussels.
Veliko udeležencev tega srečanja je ocenilo idejo o ustanovitvi prihodnje neformalne delovne skupine poslancev, v okviru katere bodo poslanci pripravili predloge za načrtovan pregled v letu 2008/2009, kot dober način, da se parlamenti v celoti vključijo v proces
Many participants of this meeting considered the idea of supporting a future informal working group of parliamentarians to feed suggestions into the review planned for 2008 / 2009 as a good way to ensure that parliaments were fully involved in the process
Poročilo delovne skupine 4, kot je bilo predloženo na skupni parlamentarni seji 9. maja 2006. .
Summary of Working Group 4 as presented to the plenary of the JPM on 9 May 2006 .
Po mnenju poročevalca predstavlja naslednja skupna parlamentarna seja 4. in 5. decembra 2006 priložnost za spodbujanje vključevanja Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov v proces preverjanja in oblikovanja bolj strukturiranega dialoga.
In your rapporteur's view, the next Joint Parliamentary Meeting of 4 - 5 December 2006 will offer the opportunity to promote the involvement of the European Parliament and the national parliaments in the review process and steer the dialogue into a more structured phase.
"Prihodnost financiranja Unije" bo zopet tema delovne skupine.
"The future financing of the Union" will again be the topic of one Working Group.
Zanimive in plodne razprave na podlagi že opravljenega skupnega dela bodo zagotovo sledile.
Interesting and productive discussions on the basis of the work already done jointly will certainly follow.
Če se bodo parlamentarni stiki bodisi na multilateralni ali bilateralni ravni še naprej odvijali v duhu vzajemnega zaupanja in odprtosti, v katerem so se začeli, je poročevalec prepričan, da bi Evropski parlament in parlamenti držav članic lahko oblikovali skupno stališče o osnovnih načelih sistema lastnih sredstev v prihodnosti.
If parliamentary contacts, be they on a multilateral or bilateral level, continue in the spirit of mutual trust and openness they have started in, your rapporteur is convinced that some common understanding on basic principles how the own resources system of the future should look like could be achieved between the European Parliament and the parliaments of the Member States.
Poročevalec namerava rezultate skupnega dela nacionalnih parlamentov in Evropskega parlamenta vključiti v samoiniciativno poročilo o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev EU, o katerem naj bi se razpravljalo in glasovalo na plenarnem zasedanju spomladi 2007.
Your rapporteur intends to include the results of the work conducted jointly by the national parliaments and the European Parliament in his own initiative report on the future of the EU's own resources, to be debated and voted in plenary in spring of 2007.
Poročilo bi lahko Komisiji ponudilo nekaj splošnih smernic za pregledovanje, voditeljem držav in vlad pa bi dalo jasen znak glede prihodnjih konceptov njihovih parlamentov.
This report could then provide some common guidelines for the Commission's review work, thus giving a clear signal to the Heads of State and government of what their parliaments' concepts for the future may be.
Osnovna načela novega sistema
Basic principles for any new system
Poročevalec upa, da bo mogoče na podlagi predlogov komisarke Schreyer iz leta 2004 kot izhodiščem in študije o lastnih sredstvih po naročilu Parlamenta v letu 2005
With the Schreyer proposals of 2004 as a starting point and the study on own resources commissioned by Parliament in 2005
Študijska skupina za evropske politike (SEP), 30. junij 2005: Lastna sredstva: razvoj sistema v EU s 25 državami članicami.
Study Group for European Policies (SEP), 30 June 2005: Own resources: Evolution of the system in a EU of 25.
Študija Evropskega parlamenta. kot nadaljnje snovi za obravnavo v številnih razpravah s predstavniki nacionalnih parlamentov oblikovati skupno stališče glede naslednjih osnovnih točk reforme:
Study for the European Parliament . as some further food for thought, your rapporteur, in his numerous discussions with representatives of the national parliaments, would hope for a consensus emerging on the following cornerstones for a reform:
· polno spoštovanje fiskalne suverenosti držav članic
· Full respect of the fiscal sovereignty of the Member States
Nov sistem Evropski uniji pod nobenim pogojem ne omogoča pravice do pobiranja davkov.
Under no circumstances shall a new system grant the European Union the right to levy taxes.
Fiskalno suverenost ohranijo izključno države članice, ki lahko Unijo za določeno obdobje pooblastijo, da neposredno terja določen delež nekega davka.
Fiscal sovereignty will remain with the Member States alone who might authorise the Union for a limited period of time to directly benefit from a certain share of a tax.
Države članice lahko to odločitev kadarkoli prekličejo.
This decision by the Member States can be revoked at any time.
Prenos politike na evropsko raven ne sme povečati skupnih javnih odhodkov ali povečati davčne obremenitve državljanov.
All other things equal, the transfer of a policy to the European level must not increase overall public expenditure nor the tax burden for the citizens.
Če se bo v okviru novega sistema del davka neposredno odvajal Evropski uniji, je treba zagotoviti ustrezno zmanjšanje na nekem drugem mestu.
Should a new system directly allocate part of a tax to the European Union, an equivalent reduction will have to take place elsewhere.
Zgornja meja v višini 1,24 % BND se ohrani.
The ceiling of 1,24% of GNI will be taken for granted.
Predvideti je treba prehodna obdobja za postopno uvajanje novega sistema.
Transition periods for a gradual introduction of the new system have to be foreseen.
Če bi dosegli politični sporazum, se bi lahko prva faza reforme začela leta 2009.
If political agreement could be achieved, a first phase of the reform could start from 2009.
Čeprav bi se sistem nacionalnih prispevkov kot tak ohranil, bi ga lahko oblikovali tako, da bi bil bolj enostaven, pregleden in dosledno sorazmeren z relativnim bogastvom posamezne države članice.
While keeping the system of national contributions as such, it could be modified to become more simple, transparent and absolutely in proportion with the relative wealth of each Member State.
· vzpostavitev jasne politične povezave med reformo prihodkov in reformo odhodkov
· Establishment of a clear political link between a reform of revenue and a reform of expenditure
Reforma strukture prihodkov EU in reforma strukture odhodkov EU morata potekati usklajeno, kot predvideva Izjava 3 novega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
A reform of the structure of EU revenue and a reform of the structure of EU expenditure have to go hand in hand, as foreseen in Declaration 3 of the new Interinstitutional agreement.
Prehod s sistema prispevkov držav članic na sistem pravih lastnih sredstev, ki Uniji pritekajo neposredno, bo imel za posledico tudi, da pri odhodkih EU ne bo treba več upoštevati zahtev po vračilu denarja.
Changing from a system of Member States’ contributions to a system of genuine own resources directly allocated to the Union will also free EU expenditure from having to comply with any “I want my money back!” requirements.
Nadaljnji premisleki
Further considerations
Obremenitev nacionalnih proračunov s prispevki k finančnim sredstvom EU je možno zmanjšati, če bi Evropska unija imela neposreden vir davčnih prihodkov, o katerem bi se odločalo na nacionalni ravni, vendar v tesni povezavi z dejavnostmi Skupnosti.
The burden on national treasuries of contributing to EU finances could be reduced by directly attributing to the European Union a fiscal resource, decided upon within a national framework but closely linked to community activities.
To drugo fazo bi lahko postopoma uvedli od leta 2014 dalje.
Such a second phase could be progressively introduced from 2014.
Da bi imeli za preučevanje dejanskih možnih prihodnjih elementov prihodkov EU na voljo aktualne in zanesljive podatke, poročevalec čaka tudi na rezultate študije, ki jo je oktobra 2006 naročil Evropski parlament in ki se osredotoča na nekatere davke, ki bi lahko prišli v poštev za nov sistem lastnih sredstev.
In order to have up-to-date reliable data to explore concrete possibilities for future components of EU revenue, your rapporteur is also looking forward to the results of a study commissioned by the European Parliament in October 2006 which will focus on some taxes that might be candidates for a new Own resources system.
Za jasno ponazoritev možnih političnih odločitev bi lahko Komisijo pozvali, da pripravi podroben pregled prednosti in slabosti obstoječih nacionalnih davkov, ki bi bile primerne za ta namen, ob upoštevanju osnovnih predhodno navedenih načel v celoti.
To clearly establish the political choices available, the Commission could also be invited to present a detailed account of the advantages and disadvantages of existing national taxes that could be used for this purpose while fully respecting the basic principles as listed above.
Poročevalec pričakuje, da bo lahko v svojem samoiniciativnem poročilu o lastnih sredstvih, ki naj bi se na zasedanju obravnavalo spomladi 2007, na podlagi dela, opravljenega v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti v zadnjem letu, predstavil nekatere konkretne predloge prihodnjega sistema lastnih sredstev, ki je pravičen in državljanom lahko razumljiv ter shaja brez mehanizma nadomestil in nacionalnih izjem.
In his initiative report on own resources that is scheduled to go to plenary in spring 2007 your rapporteur, on the basis of the work done in the last year, in close cooperation with the national parliaments, expects to be in a position to present some concrete ideas on how a future system of own resources that is fair and easily understandable for our citizens and can do without compensation mechanisms and national exemptions, could look like.
Medinstitucionalni sporazum o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
Izjava o pregledu finančnega okvira
Declaration on the review of the financial framework
V skladu s sklepi Evropskega sveta je bila Komisija pozvana, naj pripravi celovit in obsežen pregled, ki bo zajemal vse vidike porabe EU, vključno s Skupno kmetijsko politiko, in sredstev EU, vključno z zmanjšanjem za Združeno kraljestvo, ter da o tem poroča v letu 2008/2009.
In accordance with the conclusions of the European Council, the Commission has been invited to undertake a full, wide-ranging review covering all aspects of EU spending, including the Common Agricultural Policy, and of resources, including the United Kingdom rebate, and to report in 2008/2009.
- ko Komisija predloži pregled, sledi faza preverjanja, v kateri se zagotovijo ustrezne razprave z Evropskim parlamentom na podlagi običajnega političnega dialoga med institucijami in ustrezno upoštevanje stališč Parlamenta;
- during the examination phase following the presentation of the review by the Commission, it will be ensured that appropriate discussions take place with the European Parliament on the basis of the normal political dialogue between the institutions and that the positions of the European Parliament are duly taken into account;
- Evropski svet v skladu s svojimi sklepi iz decembra 2005 "lahko sprejema odločitve o vseh zadevah, ki jih pregled obravnava".
- in accordance with its conclusions of December 2005, the European Council "can take decisions on all the subjects covered by the review".
o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev Evropske unije
on the future of the European Union´s own resources
Glej odstavek 18 mnenja št. 2/2006 (UL C 203, 25.8.2006, str.
See paragraph 18 of Opinion No 2/2006 (OJ C 203, 25.8.2006, p.
7. meni, da morata Parlament in Svet v skladu z dvojno naravo EU kot unije državljanov in držav skupaj sprejeti odločitev o novem sistemu lastnih sredstev;
In keeping with the dual nature of the EU as a Union of citizens and of the States the decision on a new system of own resources must be taken by the European Parliament and the Council together;
9. kar zadeva letni proračun, je treba čim prej prenehati razlikovanje med obveznimi in neobveznimi odhodki, kot to že določa ustavna pogodba, da se Evropskemu parlamentu zagotovi popolno soodločanje za vse proračunske kategorije;
As regards the annual budget, the ending of the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditures already provided for in the Constitutional Treaty should be implemented as soon as possible to guarantee the European Parliament full co-decision in all budgetary categories;
10. poziva pristojni odbor, naj organizira konferenco o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev Unije z udeležbo predstavnikov nacionalnih parlamentov držav članic.
Calls on its competent Committee to organize a conference on the future of the Union’s own resources with the participation of representatives of the Member States National Parliaments.
Prihodnost lastnih sredstev Evropske unije
The future of the European Union´s own resources
2. poudarja pomen udeležbe Parlamenta pri "poglobljeni izmenjavi mnenj" o preoblikovanju sistema lastnih sredstev Evropske unije, kot je določeno v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2006;
Emphasises the importance of Parliament's involvement in the "in-depth exchange of views" on the reform of the European Union's own resources system, as laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006;
4. pozdravlja delovno metodo poročevalca in zlasti tesno sodelovanje nacionalnih parlamentov v različnih stopnjah postopka, ki omogoča konvergenco;
Welcomes the working method followed by the rapporteur and, in particular, the close involvement of the national parliaments at the different stages of the procedure, allowing convergence;
9. poudarja, da mora novi sistem temeljiti na načelu progresivnosti ter zato pri določanju sposobnosti posamezne države članice za prispevanje v proračun Unije, upoštevati njeno raven prihodkov, ko je to potrebno;
Points to the need for the new system to be based on the progressivity principle and hence reflect, when necessary, the income levels of the individual Member States in order to determine to what extent they will be able to contribute to the EU budget;
11. vztraja, da je treba potencial obstoječih davčnih formul v celoti preučiti preden se obravnava nove, da se tako izogne uvajanju novih formul, ki bi lahko sprožile povečano davčno breme;
Maintains that the potential of existing taxation formulas should be fully explored before new ones are considered in order to avoid introducing new formulas that may entail increased tax pressure;
13. podpira postopno izvajanje kakršnih koli morebitnih novih mehanizmov financiranja, kot je uvedba dejanskih lastnih sredstev Evropske unije v obliki na primer davka na dodano vrednost, trošarine na motorno gorivo za cestni promet, trošarine na tobak ali alkohol, ekološkega davka ali odstotka davka od dobička pravnih oseb, izračunanega iz skupne davčne osnove v podaljšanem prehodnem obdobju.
Supports the phasing-in of any eventual new financing mechanisms, such as the introduction of genuine own resources of the European Union, in the form, for example, of value added tax, excise duty on motor fuel for road transport, excise duty on tobacco or alcohol, environmental tax or a percentage of corporation tax calculated according to a common consolidated tax base over an extended transition period.
UL L 139, 14.6.2006, str.
OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.