natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Članek je nato kritiziral stanje pravosodja v Italiji na podlagi primera senatorja Jannuzzija, ki naj bi bil "nemudoma zaprt zaradi treh člankov, ki jih je napisal pred enim desetletjem v skladu s pravico do svobodnega izražanja, ki je v ustavi in je uvrščena med temeljne pravice posameznika, ki velja tako zanj kot tudi za vsakega drugega italijanskega državljana".
The article went on to criticise the state of justice in Italy in the light of the Jannuzzi case, in which he is due to be "imprisoned immediately for three articles written a decade ago in accordance with the right of free expression enshrined in the Constitution among the fundamental freedoms of the individual which apply to him and every other Italian citizen".
Članek je nadalje trdil, da dejstvo, da sodišče v Neaplju ni uporabilo drugih kazni, kot je zapor, nagonsko zbuja sum, da gre za fumus persecutionis.
The article further claimed that the fact that the Court in Naples did not have recourse to penalties other than imprisonment generates an instinctive suspicion of fumus persecutionis .
V preostanku članka je Giuseppe Gargani razpravljal o kaznih, ki nadomeščajo kazen zapora in o pomanjkanju predpisov o poslanski imuniteti kot o sredstvu za doseganje ravnovesja med vejami oblasti države ter za preprečitev, da lahko sodstvo pritiska na parlament.
In the remainder of the article, Mr Gargani discussed alternative penalties to imprisonment and the question of the lack of rules on parliamentary immunity as a means of achieving a balance between the arms of the State and of avoiding the judiciary's being able to put pressure on the Parliament.
Obravnaval je tudi vprašanje politizacije sodstva in vloge sodnih uradnikov, ki lahko preiskujejo nek primer in nato v njem tudi sodijo, ter vlogo, ki jo lahko ima ustrezno poklicno usposabljanje za sodstvo pri reformi sodstva v Italiji.
He also aired the question of the politicisation of the judiciary and the role of judicial officers who may investigate cases and then judge them, together with the role which proper vocational training for the judiciary might play in the reform of the judicial system in Italy.
Gargani je zaključil z mislijo, da bi reforma sodstva preprečila nadaljnje prošnje za pomilostitev, naslovljene na predsednika republike, "ki ne bo na voljo za vsakega državljana, ki ima smolo, da naleti na sodnika, ki deluje na podlagi predsodkov in ne kaže ravnovesja in občutka za odgovornost".
Mr Gargani concluded by saying that the reform of the judicial system would avoid further applications to the President of the Republic for a pardon, which "will not be available for every citizen who has the misfortune to come up against a judge who operates in accordance with preconceived ideas and shows no sense of responsibility or balance".
Ugotovljeno je, da v članku ime tožnice ni navedeno, le sodišče, katere predsednica je.
It is noted that the claimant is not mentioned by name in the article, merely the court of which she is the President.
Tožnica trdi, da je domnevno obrekovanje toliko bolj "edinstveno" glede na Garganijev življenjepis, ki vsebuje diplomo iz prava, članstvo v odvetniški zbornici, mesto vodje oddelka za pravosodje Krščanske demokratske stranke v deželi Kampanija in mesto predsednika Odbora za pravne zadeve Evropskega parlamenta.
The claimant argues that the alleged defamatory remarks are rendered all the more "singular" in view of Mr Gargani's curriculum vitae, which mentions his law degree, his membership of the Bar, his post as head of the Justice Department of the Christian Democrat Party in Campania and his position as Chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament.
Treba je opozoriti, da je tožnica pred tem začela kazenski postopek v zvezi z istimi dejstvi pred sodiščem v Rimu.
It should be noted that the complainant had previously brought criminal proceedings in respect of same facts in the Tribunale di Roma .
Zadeva je bila zaključena na podlagi ugotovitve, da je Giuseppe Gargani kritične trditve postavil "v času izvrševanja svojih poslanskih dolžnosti, kot to določa člen 68 ustave".
That case was closed on the ground that Mr Gargani had made the statements in question "in the course of exercising his parliamentary duties, as provided for in Article 68 of the Constitution".
Kljub temu je jasno, da tožnica vztraja pri svoji trditvi, da je Giuseppe Gargani storil kaznivo dejanje obrekovanja, saj je v sodnem pozivu navedeno, da osebe, kot je obtoženi "so enako odgovorne, ko je publikacija sredstvo za storitev kaznivega dejanja in posledično povzroči škodo, tudi v primerih, ko (za razliko od tega primera) nobeno kazensko sodišče ni ugotovilo, ali je bilo dejanje storjeno, saj niso bili izpolnjeni potrebni pogoji za kazenski pregon, zato pa je civilni sodnik incidenter tantum in le za namene dodelitve odškodnine odločil, da je bilo kaznivo dejanje storjeno."
Nevertheless, it is clear that the complainant is persisting in her assertion that Mr Gargani is guilty of criminal defamation in so far as it is stated in the writ of summons that persons such as the accused "are equally liable where a publication is the means of committing a crime and consequently gives rise to the damage, even in cases in which (in contrast with the present case) no criminal court has ascertained whether the offence was committed because the necessary requirements were not fulfilled for the matter to be prosecuted, with the result that the judge in the civil court may recognise incidenter tantum , and solely for the purpose of awarding compensation, that the crime was committed."
Člen 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah določa, da poslanec Evropskega parlamenta uživa popolno imuniteto pred sodnimi postopki "zaradi mnenja ..., ki ga je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti".
Article 9 of the Protocol on privileges and immunities provides that Members of the European Parliament have absolute immunity from legal proceedings "in respect of opinions expressed .. in the performance of their duties".
V svojem zahtevku, vloženem pri sodišču v Rimu, tožnica zahteva kaznovalno odškodnino v višini 500.000 EUR, solidarno od večjega števila tožencev, vključno z Giuseppejem Garganijem, zaradi obrekovanja tožnice in posledično razžalitve njene časti in dobrega imena.
In her summons lodged with the Tribunale di Roma , the claimant seeks punitive damages of EUR 500,000 jointly and severally against a number of defendants, including Mr Gargani, for allegedly libelling the claimant and therefore injuring her reputation.
Analiza članka kaže, da je Gargani le komentiral zadevo v javnem interesu in je uporabil primer senatorja Jannuzzija kot iztočnico za kritiko italijanskega sodstva, zagovor poslanske imunitete in razpravo o predlogih za reformo sodstva.
It appears from an analysis of the article in question that Mr Gargani was merely commenting on a matter of public interest and used the case of Mr Januzzi as his starting point for a critique of the Italian judicial system, a defence of Parliamentary immunity and a discussion of proposals for the reform of the judicial system.
Glede na položaj, ki ga ima Gargani, ne le kot politik, temveč tudi kot predsednik Odbora za pravne zadeve, ki je odgovoren za privilegije in imunitete poslancev (v skladu s prilogo VI, oddelkom XVI, točko ) poslovnika), ima legitimni interes, da izrazi svoje mnenje o stanju, ki zadeva poslansko imuniteto v Italiji.
In view of Mr Gargani's position, not only as a politician, but as Chairman of Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs, which is responsible for privileges and immunities of members (by virtue of Annex VI, Section XVI, point 9 of the Rules of Procedure), he has a legitimate interest in expressing his opinion on the situation appertaining to parliamentary immunity in Italy.
Glede na to, da je Odbor za pravne zadeve Parlamenta v skladu s členom 10 Protokola obvezan, da uporabi nacionalno pravo o poslanski imuniteti, bi bilo mogoče trditi, da nima le pravice, temveč celo dolžnost, da načne javno razpravo o takih vprašanjih.
Indeed, in view of the fact that Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs is obliged under Article 10 of the Protocol to apply national law on parliamentary immunity, it could be argued that he has not only the right but a duty to initiate public debate on such matters.
Giuseppe Gargani je z objavo kritičnega članka le opravljal svoje delo kot poslanec in predsednik Odbora za pravne zadeve.
In publishing the article in question Mr Gargani was simply doing his job as a Member of Parliament and Chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee.
Poskusi, da se poslance Evropskega parlamenta utiša pri izražanju svojih mnenj o zadevah, za katere vladata legitimni javni interes in zaskrbljenost, tako, da se proti njim sproži sodne postopke, so v demokratični družbi nesprejemljivi in očitno kršijo člen 9 Protokola, katerega namen je varovati svobodo izražanja poslancev pri izvrševanju njihovih dolžnosti v interesu Parlamenta kot institucije.
To seek to gag Members of Parliament from expressing their opinions on matters of legitimate public interest and concern by bringing legal proceedings is unacceptable in a democratic society and manifestly in breach of Article 9 of the Protocol, which is intended to protect Members' freedom of expression in the performance of their duties in the interests of Parliament as an institution.
Nadalje dejstvo, da je bil sprožen civilni postopek potem, ko je tožnica neuspešno poskušala začeti kazenski postopek v zvezi z istim dejanskim stanjem, kaže na to, da obstaja fumus persecutionis.
Furthermore, the fact that the civil proceedings in question were brought after criminal proceedings were unsuccessfully initiated at the instance of the claimant in respect of the same facts suggests that there is a fumus persecutionis .
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti zaščiti imunitete, Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament zaščiti poslansko imuniteto Giuseppeja Garganija.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the immunity of Mr Giuseppe Gargani be defended.
Zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Giuseppeja Garganija
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Giuseppe Gargani
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o odprtju tarifnih kvot za uvoz surovega trsnega sladkorja v Bolgarijo in Romunijo za dobavo rafinerijam v tržnih letih 2006/2007, 2007/2008 in 2008/2009
on the proposal for a Council regulation opening tariff quotas for imports into Bulgaria and Romania of raw cane sugar for supply to refineries in the marketing years 2006/2007, 2007/2008 and 2008/2009
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0798 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0798 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37(2) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0003/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0003/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6‑0072/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0072/2007 ),
Člen 1, točka 3 a (novo)
Article 1, paragraph 3 a (new)
S tržnim letom 2009/2010 se ne odobri nobena dodatna tarifna kvota, če ni v okviru Uredbe Sveta št. 2501 z dne 10. decembra 2001 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2004 1 (pobuda "Vse, razen orožja") in privilegiranega dostopa na trg za države Afrike, Karibov in Pacifika (AKP).
From the marketing year 2009/10, no tariff quotas shall be allocated other than in relation to Council Regulation (EC) No 2501 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 1 (the 'Everything But Arms' Regulation) and preferential market access for African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States.
UL L 346, 31.12.2001, str.
1 OJ L 346, 31.12.2001, p.
Jasno je, da je treba odstopanje časovno omejiti, da bo mogoče uresničiti cilje zmanjšanja količin, zastavljene v reformi skupne ureditve v sektorju sladkorja.
This derogation should be explicitly restricted to a definite period of time in order to achieve the reduction of sugar quantities in line with the reform of the common market organisation in sugar.
Glavni cilj reforme skupne ureditve trgov v sektorju sladkorja Evropske unije, sprejete julija 2006, (Uredba (ES) št. 318/2006), je zmanjšanje količin sladkorja, proizvedenega v Uniji, prilagoditev proizvodnje sladkorja z njegovo porabo v Skupnosti in s tem doseči boljše ravnovesje na trgu za sladkor.
The main aims of the reform of the European common market organisation in sugar (Regulation 318/2006/EC), adopted in July 2006, were to reduce the mounting quantities of sugar in the EU, to adapt the market to domestic sugar consumption and, in so doing, to improve market balance for sugar.
Treba je primerno zmanjšati količino sladkorja, proizvedenega v Uniji, da bo poleg privilegiranega uvoza iz držav AKP, Indije in držav zahodnega Balkana v okviru pobude "Vse, razen orožja", ki bo začela s polno veljavo leta 2009, mogoče uvažati sladkor brez carine, ne da bi pri tem presegli porabo.
It is intended that the quantity of sugar produced in the EU should be reduced to the extent that sugar can be imported duty-free under the Everything But Arms initiative, which will be fully in force in 2009, alongside the existing preferential imports from ACP countries and India and from the Western Balkan countries, without the import quantities exceeding consumption.
Ta cilj je sedaj le delno uresničen.
As yet, this objective has been only partially achieved.
Sklad za prestrukturiranje, vzpostavljen v okviru sheme za prestrukturiranje, ki naj bi z izplačilom premij spodbudil industrijo sladkorja, da se odreče kvotam, ima na razpolago še dve tretjini svojih sredstev.
Only a third of the restructuring fund provided for by the restructuring scheme, whereby premium payments are issued as an incentive for the sugar industry to reduce quotas, has been used.
Komisija mora premisliti o nadaljnjih upravnih ukrepih za izpolnitev zahtev reforme sladkornega trga.
The Commission must now consider further administrative measures to meet the requirements of the sugar market reforms.
Glede na to je treba strogo določiti odstopanja, ki bi lahko vplivala na povečanje količine sladkorja, proizvedenega v Uniji, na primer uvoz sladkornega trsa iz tretjih držav pod posebno ugodnimi pogoji.
Under these circumstances, any derogations liable to increase the quantity of sugar produced in the EU, such as the import of raw cane sugar under favourable conditions, should be tightly regulated.
Komisija meni, da je treba bolgarski in romunski industriji sladkorja v skladu s tradicionalnimi potrebami dobave odobriti dveletno obdobje za uvoz sladkorja z ugodno dajatvijo 98 evrov za tono, da ne bi bili državi oškodovani zaradi pristopa k Uniji ter da bi sektorju sladkorja obeh držav omogočili utrditev na skupnem trgu.
In the Commission's view, based on traditional supply needs the respective sugar industries in Bulgaria and Romania should be granted a two-year period in which they may import sugar at a preferential duty of EUR 98 a tonne in order to offset any unfairness towards the new Member States following their accession and to allow the sugar sector in both countries to stabilise its position on the internal market.
Znižana dajatev temelji na koncesijah pri kvotah CXL, določenih v pristopnih pogajanjih s Finsko.
The reduced duty corresponds to the level fixed for CXL concessions sugar during Finland's accession negotiations.
Kvote CXL bodo le začasne, da se doseže skladnost v skupni ureditvi trgov v sektorju sladkorja.
The CXL quota should also apply for a restricted period of time, in order to ensure consistency in the common organisation of markets.
Zaradi teh razlogov ter da se zagotovi poštena konkurenca v sektorju sladkorja v Evropski uniji in oblikujejo dosledni predpisi za uvoz, je treba uvoz sladkorja s posebno ugodno dajatvijo časovno omejiti.
For the above reasons, and in order to guarantee fair competition in the Union's sugar sector and the fixing of definitive import rules, the possibility of importing sugar at preferential duties should apply for a clearly restricted period of time.
Taka je tudi vsebina predloga spremembe, ki ga vlaga poročevalec.
The amendment tabled by the rapporteur proposes a possible time limit.
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o odprtju tarifnih kvot za uvoz surovega trsnega sladkorja v Bolgarijo in Romunijo za dobavo rafinerijam v tržnih letih 2006/2007, 2007/2008 in 2008/2009
Tariff quotas for imports into Bulgaria and Romania of raw cane sugar
o spremenjenem predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskih ukrepih za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine
on the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................23
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY...............24
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 34
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 36
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskih ukrepih za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0168 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0168 )
Še neobjavljen v Uradnem listu. ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0233/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0233/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0073/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0073/2007 ),
(5) Direktiva 2004/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine določa civilne in upravne ukrepe, postopke in pravna sredstva.
(5) Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights lays down measures, procedures and civil and administrative remedies.
Določbe te direktive je treba dopolniti z dovolj odvračilnimi kazenskimi določbami, ki bi se uporabljale na celotnem ozemlju Skupnosti.
A sufficiently dissuasive set of penalties applicable throughout the Community is needed to make the provisions laid down in this Directive complete.
Približevanje nekaterih kazenskih določb je nujno potrebno za uspešen boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu na notranjem trgu.
Certain criminal provisions need to be harmonised so that counterfeiting and piracy in the internal market can be combated effectively.
Zakonodajalec Skupnosti je pristojen za sprejetje kazenskih ukrepov, potrebnih za zagotovitev popolne učinkovitosti standardov, ki jih sprejme na področju varstva intelektualne lastnine.
The Community legislator has the power to take the criminal-law measures that are necessary to guarantee the full effectiveness of the rules it lays down on the protection of intellectual property.
Zakonodajalec Skupnosti je pristojen za sprejetje kazenskih ukrepov, potrebnih za zagotovitev popolne učinkovitosti standardov, ki jih sprejme na področju varstva intelektualne lastnine, kakor je opredeljena s to direktivo, razen patentov .
The Community legislator has the power to take the criminal-law measures that are necessary to guarantee the full effectiveness of the rules it lays down on the protection of intellectual property , as defined by this Directive, other than patents .
Ta predlog spremembe je potreben, da se zagotovi doslednost s predlogi sprememb, ki sledijo, in da se od samega začetka opredeli področje delovanja direktive.
This amendment is necessary to ensure consistency with subsequent amendments and to establish from the outset the scope of the directive.
(6a) Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 7. septembra 2006 o ponarejanju medicinskih proizvodov izrazil stališče, da mora Evropska skupnosti nujno vzpostaviti potrebne instrumente za učinkovit boj proti nezakonitim dejavnostim na področju piratstva in ponarejanja medicinskih proizvodov.
(6a) In its resolution of 7 September 2006 on counterfeiting of medicinal products, the European Parliament took the view that the European Union should equip itself as a matter of urgency with the means to combat effectively illicit practices in the area of piracy and the counterfeiting of medicines.
Zadnji carinski statistični podatki iz leta 2005 o zaplembi ponarejenega blaga na mejah Evropske unije kažejo, da so se zaplembe ponarejenih medicinskih proizvodov v letu 2005 povečale za 100% v primerjavi z letom 2004.
According to 2005 customs statistics on the seizure of counterfeit goods at the European Union's frontiers, seizures of counterfeit medicines increased by 100% in 2005 compared to 2004.
(8) Predvideti je treba določbe, namenjene olajšanju kazenskih preiskav.
(8) Provisions must be laid down to facilitate criminal investigations.
Države članice morajo predvideti, da lahko zadevni imetniki pravic intelektualne lastnine ali njihovi predstavniki ter strokovnjaki prispevajo k preiskavam, ki jih opravljajo skupne preiskovalne enote.
The Member States must ensure that the holders of intellectual property rights concerned, or their representatives, and experts are allowed to assist the investigations carried out by joint investigation teams.
Sodelovanje zainteresiranega imetnika pravic intelektualne lastnine pomeni pomoč brez poseganja v nepristranskost državne preiskave.
The involvement of the holders of intellectual property rights concerned should constitute a supporting role that will not interfere with the neutrality of the state investigations.
Treba je pojasniti, da sodelovanje žrtev pri preiskavah, ki jih vodita policija ali državni tožilec, ne sme posegati v nepristranskost državnih preiskovalnih organov.
It should be made clear that the involvement of injured parties in investigations carried out by the police or public prosecutors’ offices must not jeopardise the neutrality of those state investigation agencies.
Jamstvo objektivnosti in nepristranskosti je eno izmed načel pravne države.
Maintaining objectivity and neutrality is part and parcel of the rule of law.
(9a) Pri opredeljevanju kaznivih dejanj in sankcij ter med preiskavo in sodnim postopkom je treba v celoti spoštovati pravice, določene v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
(9a) The rights set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union should be fully respected when defining criminal acts and penalties, during investigations and in the course of judicial proceedings.
(10) To ne vpliva na sisteme odgovornosti ponudnikov internetnih storitev, predvidenih v členih 12 do 15 Direktive 2000/31/ES o elektronskem poslovanju .
(10) This Directive does not affect specific liability systems such as that laid down for Internet service providers in Articles 12 to 15 of Directive 2000/31/EC on electronic commerce.