natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
S/z [datum, ki se ga določi, naveden v členu 4] se razveljavijo naslednje določbe:
With effect from [date to be specified, indicated in Article 4] the following provisions shall be repealed:
Z/s ...* se razveljavijo naslednje določbe:
With effect from ...* the following provisions shall be repealed:
* začetkom veljavnosti te direktive
* Date of en try into force of this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do […] .
The Member States shall adopt the measures necessary for them to comply with the provisions of this Directive by […] .
Države članice sprejmejo predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 31. decembra 2012 .
The Member States shall adopt the measures necessary for them to comply with the provisions of this Directive by 31 December 2012 .
Države članice se v sprejetih ukrepih sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
When the Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Ta direktiva začne veljati […] dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije .
This Directive shall enter into force on the […] day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Ta direktiva začne veljati na dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije .
This Directive shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Komisija in Svet sta se začela s temo zdravja in delovnih pogojev delavcev v Evropski skupnosti ukvarjati zelo pozno.
In the European Communities, worker health and working conditions were matters to which the Commission and Council did not begin to address themselves until very late in the day.
Razprava o delovnih pogojih se je začela v sedemdesetih letih in v začetku osemdesetih let s sprejetjem direktive Seveso in ustanovitvijo Svetovalnega odbora za varnost in zdravje pri delu, kar je na nek način pomenilo nadaljevanje posebnih programov o zdravju delavcev, vzpostavljenih v okviru Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo.
In the 1970s and the early 1980s the Seveso Directive and the setting-up of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work were the first instances in which concerns about working conditions were raised, following on, in a way, from the specific workers’ health programmes established under the then European Coal and Steel Community.
Direktiva 83/477/EGS o varstvu delavcev pred tveganji zaradi izpostavljenosti azbestu pri delu je zgled za takšna prvostopenjska delna prizadevanja, tj. opredeljena na osnovi določenih dejavnikov tveganja, ki so predmet direktiv.
Directive 83/477/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work is the model for this first level of partial concerns, that is to say, defined according to given risk factors, which have been the subject of directives.
Drugih tem, kot so splošno zdravje delavcev in delovni pogoji, organizacija zdravstvenih, higienskih in varnostnih storitev pri delu ter seznam poklicnih bolezni, države članice niso soglasno sprejele.
Other matters such as the health of workers in general and working conditions, the organisation of health, hygiene, and safety services at the workplace, and the list of occupational diseases failed to secure the unanimous approval of the Member States.
Takrat je bil tudi uveden izraz „socialni damping“ za nelojalno konkurenco podjetij in držav, ki niso vlagale v varnost in zdravje svojih delavcev.
At that time the term ‘social dumping’ was coined to denote unfair competition by companies and countries that were not investing in the safety and health of their labour force.
Leta 1989 je tema okvirne direktive (Direktiva 89/397/EGS) zaznamovala pomemben korak, saj so bile vanjo zajete predhodne pobude Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije v okviru njenih delovnih programov, in zlasti zato, ker je pomenila odziv na konvencije in priporočila Mednarodne delovne organizacije o zdravju delavcev (1981) ter o službah medicine dela (1985).
In 1989 the issue of the framework directive (Directive 89/391/EEC) marked a significant step forward matching earlier initiatives by the World Health Organisation under its worker health programmes and, in particular, serving to respond to the International Labour Organisation’s 1981 and 1985 conventions and recommendations relating, respectively, to the health of workers and the organisation of occupational health services.
Omenjeni okvirni direktivi je sledilo najmanj šestnajst direktiv, katerih cilj je bil nadgraditi usklajevanje delovnih pogojev v razširjeni Skupnosti.
This framework directive has been followed by at least 16 directives aimed at upward harmonisation of working conditions in the enlarged Communities.
V devetdesetih letih so bile sprejete še druge direktive o zaščiti mladih delavcev, začasnih delavcev in ladijskega osebja.
Continuing into the 1990s, other directives were published to protect young workers, temporary workers, and those manning ships.
Kot lahko vidimo danes, rezultati velikega števila direktiv niso bili sorazmerni in praktični.
As can be seen today, the abundance of directives has not led to commensurate practical results.
Možnih razlogov za to je več, na primer ta, da izvajanje ni nadzorovano niti na nacionalni ravni niti na ravni Evropske unije.
There are many possible reasons, one being that implementation is not monitored either at national or at Union level.
Čeprav vse direktive, vključno z okvirno direktivo iz leta 1989 o uvajanju ukrepov za spodbujanje izboljšav varnosti in zdravja delavcev pri delu, izrecno pozivajo države članice, naj Komisiji poročajo o praktičnem izvajanju določb in pri tem predložijo tudi mnenja socialnih partnerjev, je splošno znano, da nekatere države članice zahtevanih poročil niso podale.
Although almost all of the directives, starting with the 1989 framework directive on the introduction of measures to improve the health and safety of workers at work , explicitly call on the Member States to report to the Commission on the practical implementation of their provisions, setting out also the views of the social partners, it is common knowledge that some Member States have failed to produce the necessary reports.
II – Predlog Komisije
II – Commission proposal
Predlog Komisije vsebuje cilje za poenostavitev in racionalizacijo določb direktiv Skupnosti o zdravju in varnosti delavcev pri delu, ki državam članicam ter Komisiji nalagajo obveznost, da morajo pripraviti poročila o praktičnem izvajanju.
The proposal that the Commission has now submitted aims to simplify and rationalise the provisions of the Community directives on health and safety of workers at work imposing an obligation for Member States and the Commission to draw up practical implementation reports.
Sedaj morajo države članice tovrstna poročila oblikovati v okviru drugih direktiv, vendar je pogostost različna – nekatera poročila je treba predložiti vsaka štiri leta, druga vsakih pet let.
At present, Member States are required to draw up such reports under several individual directives, but the frequency varies: some reports have to be produced every four years, and others, every five years.
Komisija predlaga predložitev enotnega poročila vsakih pet let.
The Commission is now proposing that a single report be drawn up every five years.
III – Predlagane spremembe
III – Proposed amendments
Komisija navaja potrebo po poenostavitvi postopka, saj z njim povezane upravne omejitve pripravo poročil le še dodatno otežujejo in upočasnjujejo.
The Commission mentions the need to simplify the procedure on account of the administrative constraints which add to the difficulties and red tape involved in producing each report, but what is really needed is to coordinate the different directives more closely and make them interact more effectively so as to provide a basis for constructive comparative analysis of the various health and safety strategies being pursued in the Member States.
Vendar je še bolj potrebno tesneje uskladiti posamezne direktive in povečati učinkovitost medsebojnega delovanja, da se zagotovi osnova za konstruktivno primerjalno analizo raznih zdravstvenih in varnostnih strategij v posameznih državah članicah.
For the reasons described above, if the proposed five-yearly single report is to meet health and safety needs at the workplace, the specific matters covered by the individual directives must not, under any circumstances, be watered down or undervalued.
Zato posamezne zadeve, zajete v različnih direktivah, ne smejo biti nikakor zmanjšane ali podcenjene, če predlog za predložitev enotnega poročila vsakih pet let izpolnjuje zdravstvene in varnostne potrebe pri delu.
The single report has to assess the various points related to practical implementation of the different directives.
Enotno poročilo mora vsebovati oceno raznih točk, ki zadevajo praktično izvajanje posameznih direktiv, kot tudi podatke, razčlenjene glede na spol, ter posebne podatke o tem, kako na ženske in moške vplivajo težave in politike na področju zdravja in varnosti pri delu.
It should also provide information broken down by gender and specific data showing how women and men are affected by the problems and policies relating to health and safety at work.
Poleg splošnega dela mora biti v posameznih poglavjih obravnavano izvajanje posameznih vidikov vsake direktive, vključno s posebnimi kazalci, kjer so na voljo, skupaj s stališči socialnih partnerjev, ki morajo aktivno sodelovati pri oblikovanju poročil.
In addition to this general part, specific chapters should deal with the implementation of the particular aspects of each directive, including specific indicators, where available, and indicating the opinion of the social partners, who should be actively involved in the drafting process.
V poročilu morajo biti tudi opisane ter ocenjene strategije in sistemi za preprečevanje v posameznih državah članicah.
The report should also describe and assess the prevention strategies and systems being applied in each of the Member States.
Naše mnenje je, da je pri tem potrebno tudi oblikovanje politike, ki zagotavlja resnično nadgrajevanje usklajevanja različnih praks v državah članicah, zato mora Komisija podati poglobljeno poročilo o splošnem stanju v državah članicah.
Our contention, however, is that there has to be a policy making for genuine upward harmonisation of the Member States’ practices.
Poleg tega je treba oblikovati tudi usklajeno politiko za izboljšanje dobrega počutja delavcev pri delu.
The Commission therefore needs to submit an in-depth report on the situation in the Member States as a whole, and a concerted policy needs to be devised with a view to improving the well-being of workers at work.
Poenostavitev in racionalizacija poročil v zvezi s praktičnim izvajanjem
Simplification and rationalisation of the reports on practical implementation
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi večstranskega sporazuma med Republiko Albanijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Republiko Bolgarijo, Republiko Hrvaško, Evropsko skupnostjo, Republiko Islandijo, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Kraljevino Norveško, Srbijo in Črno goro, Romunijo in Začasno misijo Združenih narodov na Kosovu o vzpostavitvi skupnega evropskega zračnega prostora (ECAA)
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Multilateral Agreement between the Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, the European Community, the Republic of Iceland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Kingdom of Norway, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2006)0113 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0113 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 80(2), v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2), in člena 300(4) pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 80(2), in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, and Article 300(4) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0218/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0218/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0060/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0060/2007 ),
Predlagani sklep Sveta obravnava sklenitev večstranskega sporazuma o vzpostavitvi skupnega evropskega zračnega prostora (ECAA), ki naj bi zajemal vse države članice Evropske skupnosti, Islandijo in Norveško kot članici Evropskega gospodarskega prostora, ter Albanijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Bolgarijo, Hrvaško, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Romunijo, Srbijo in Črno goro ter Začasno misijo Združenih narodov na Kosovu UNMIK.
The subject matter of the proposed Council decision is the conclusion of a Multilateral Agreement on the establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA).The ECAA would include all European Community member states; Iceland and Norway as members of the European Economic Area; and Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYRM), Romania, Serbia and Montenegro and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK).
V bistvu sporazum omogoča progresivno širitev letalskega pravnega reda oziroma predpisov Evropske skupnosti na države partnerice.
In essence the agreement provides for the progressive extension of the European Community's aviation "acquis" or corpus of law, to the partner countries.
Izhaja iz postavke, da ima mednarodno civilno letalstvo integriran značaj.
It rests on the premise that international civil aviation has an integrated character.
Gre torej za celovit sporazum s ciljem vzpostavitve takšnega evropskega zračnega prostora, ki bo temeljil na nediskriminaciji zaradi državljanstva, pravici do ustanavljanja, skupnih predpisih o varnosti v letalstvu, varovanju, vodenju zračnega prometa, konkurenci, socialnem usklajevanju in enakih pogojih konkurence.
For this reason the agreement is comprehensive in its coverage and aims to create an ECAA based on non-discrimination on the grounds of nationality, freedom of establishment, common rules on aviation safety, security, air traffic management, competition, social harmonisation as well as equal conditions of competition.
Opredeljuje še izvajanje, ki je v pristojnosti Skupnega odbora in Evropskega sodišča, reševanje sporov, razlago določil sporazuma in prehodne ureditve.
It also deals with the enforcement of the agreement through a Joint Committee and the European Court of Justice, dispute settlement, interpretation of its provisions and transitional arrangements.
Parlament dokument obravnava po postopka posvetovanja v skladu s členom 80(2) in 300(2 in 4) pogodbe.
This comes to the Parliament as a Consultation procedure under Articles 80(2) and 300(2 and 4) of the Treaty.
Sporazum je asimetričen v tem smislu, da imajo države partnerice vsaka drugačno začetno osnovo glede na predpise, ki jih morajo sprejeti in prenesti.
The agreement is asymmetrical in the sense that each of the partners to it has different staring points in relation to the legislation it proposes be adopted and transposed.
Države članice EU pravni red s tega področja že uporabljajo.
Clearly EU Member States already apply the "acquis".
Isto velja še za Islandijo in Norveško kot partnerici v Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru.
The same is true for Iceland and Norway as partners in the European Economic Area.
Poseben je položaj Bolgarije in Romunije kot držav kandidatk, saj bosta po včlanitvi v EU začeli uporabljati vse uredbe in direktive.
The position of Bulgaria and Romania as candidate countries is distinct because they will apply the body of Regulations and Directives when they become full Member States.
Na drugi strani pa so pridružene stranke, to je Albanija, Bosna in Hercegovina, Hrvaška, Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija, Srbija in Črna gora in UNMIK, pri vzpostavitvi skupnega evropskega zračnega prostora soočene s precejšnjimi izzivi.
However the "associated parties", that is Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, FYRM, Serbia and Montenegro and UNMIK face substantial challenges connected to the creation of a European Common Aviation Area.
Poleg tega je splošni razvoj letalskega sektorja v partnerskih državah precej različen.
In addition the general development of the aviation sector in the partner countries varies significantly.
Vsebina večstranskega sporazuma
Contents of the Multi-lateral agreement
Sporazum določa, da svoboda ustanavljanja velja za podjetja in posameznike.
Freedom of establishment in the agreement encompasses firms and individuals.
Člen 11 o varnosti v letalstvu zagotavlja skladnost z mednarodnimi varnostnimi standardi.
Article 11 on aviation security ensures compliance with international safety standards.
Varovanje temelji na skupnih temeljnih standardih, opredeljenih z zakonodajo EU.
Aviation security shall be based on common basic standards defined in EU legislation.
Zakonodaja o državni pomoči bo postopno usklajena s pravnim redom Skupnosti.
State aid legislation will be gradually aligned with the Community "acquis".
Sporazumi, ki izkrivljajo ali omejujejo konkurenco oziroma zlorabljajo prevladujoči položaj in državna pomoč, ki izkrivlja konkurenco, niso združljivi s tem sporazumom.
Agreements which distort or restrict competition, abuse of a dominant position or State aid which distorts competition is incompatible with the agreement.
Pridružene stranke morajo ustanoviti neodvisne javne organe z dovolj pooblastili za zagotavljanje skladnosti določil sporazumov na tem področju.
The associated parties are required to set up independent public bodies entrusted with the powers necessary to ensure compliance with the agreements provisions in these areas.
Kjer je v skladu s sporazumom državna pomoč dovoljena, mora biti pregledna.
Where state aid is authorised under the terms of the agreement it shall be transparent.
Pridružene stranke morajo pripraviti izčrpen popis shem državne pomoči.
The associated parties must draw up a comprehensive inventory of State aid schemes.
Sporazum navaja tudi določbe glede izvajanja in razlage.
The agreement also provides for its enforcement and interpretation.
Če so določbe sporazuma enake določbam iz pogodbe ES oziroma aktom, sprejetim v skladu z njo, potem velja, da je končna razlaga v pristojnosti Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti.
Where its provisions arte identical to the EC Treaty or acts adopted under it the final interpreter will be the European Court of Justice.
Za uresničevanje sporazuma, reševanje sporov in revizijo priloge 1 k sporazumu (v njej so navedeni akti Skupnosti, ki jih je treba izvesti) bo pristojen Skupni odbor v sestavi predstavnikov pogodbenic.
A joint committee composed of representatives of the contracting parties will be responsible for the administration of the agreement, dispute settlement and revision of annexe 1 to the agreement which lists Community acts which must be implemented.
K sporazumu je priložen okvirni protokol med pogodbenicami (Evropsko skupnostjo, državami članicami EU, Norveško in Islandijo) in vsako posamezno pridruženo stranko (Albanijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Hrvaško, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Srbijo in Črno goro ter UNMIK).
Attached to the agreement is a draft protocol between the contracting parties (European Community, EU states, Norway and Iceland) and each of the associated parties (Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, FYRM, Serbia and Montenegro and UNMIK).
Vsaka posamezna pridružena stranka se s podpisom protokola obveže, da bo postopno uvedla zahteve iz sporazuma, pri čemer je s protokoli opredeljeno, kateri elementi sporazuma naj bi bili uvedeni v posamezni fazi.
Each of the associated parties undertakes in signing its protocol to introduce the requirements of the agreement in phases and each protocol describes which elements of the agreement should be introduced in each phase.
Treba je vendarle opozoriti, da se bodo glede na protokole posamezni elementi uvajali v različnih fazah, kar pomeni, da vzpostavljanje skupnega evropskega zračnega prostora ne bo potekalo enotno.
It should be noted that the elements are introduced in different phases in each protocol so progress towards a European Common Aviation Area will not be uniform.
Primer: do konca prvega prehodnega obdobja bo Albanija ločila izvajalca storitev zračnega prometa od nacionalnega izvršnega organa in začela s prilagodljivo uporabo zračnega prostora.
For example by the end of the first transitional period Albania will have separated its air traffic service provider from the national regulatory body and will apply flexible use of airspace.
Bosna in Hercegovina bo to isto morala storiti šele do konca drugega prehodnega obdobja.
Bosnia -Herzegovina will not be required to do this before the end of the second transitional period.
Te razlike v elementih, ki se zahtevajo za posamezna prehodna obdobja, so odsev trenutnega stanja na različnih operacijskih področjih pridruženih strank.
These differences in the elements included in the transitional periods reflect the state of advancement in various operational areas of the associated parties.
Naj opozorimo še, da so protokoli odprtega tipa, saj ne opredeljujejo časovnih rokov.
It should also be noted that the Protocols are open ended in the sense that no deadline dates are given.
Drugo prehodno obdobje se začne, ko so izpolnjeni pogoji iz prvega.
The second transitional phase begins when the conditions attached to the first transitional phase are fulfilled.
Začasna uporaba in končna izvedba
Provisional application and final implementation
Svet je sklenil, da se v času postopka ratifikacije sporazum uporablja začasno.
The Council has decided that the agreement should be applied provisionally, pending ratification by all the parties concerned.
Pogoj za dejanski začetek njegove začasne uporabe je, da Svet o svoji nameri obvestiti vse druge stranke k sporazumu.
For provisional application to take effect it must inform all the other parties to the agreement that this is its intention.
V času pisanja osnutka poročila Svet tega še ni storil.
At the time of writing the Council has not yet done this.
Končna uporaba sporazuma je odvisna od njegove ratifikacije v vseh 37 državah, kar lahko pomeni kar nekaj časa.
Final application of the agreement depends on its ratification by all thirty-seven countries concerned, which may well take some time.
Za nekatere država, na primer Hrvaško, začasna uporaba sporazuma ustavno ni mogoča.
For some countries, for example Croatia, provisional application of the agreement is not constitutionally possible.
Zaradi tega je Komisija s to državo, pa tudi s Srbijo, dosegla neformalni dogovor o tem, da bodo organi obeh držav do ratifikacije zagotovili poenostavljeno obravnavo prošenj za dostop letalskih prevoznikov iz EU.
In this instance, and with Serbia, the Commission has an informal understanding that administratively the authorities will facilitate any requests for access by EU airlines pending ratification.
Člen 28(2) sporazuma tudi določa, da se v primeru obstoječih dvostranskih sporazumov, ki so bolj prilagodljivi od začasnih dogovorov v zvezi z lastništvom, prometnimi pravicami in pogostostjo, uporablja dvostranski sporazum.
Article 28.2 of the agreement also provides that where existing bilateral agreements are more flexible than interim arrangements in the matter of ownership, traffic rights and frequencies, then the bilateral agreement should apply.
Ne glede na vse to je jasno, da bo do polnega izvajanja sporazuma preteklo še kar nekaj časa.
Nevertheless it is clear that full implementation of the agreement will take some time.
V nekaterih primerih bi lahko države dobile še posebno spodbudo, če bi se jim odprla možnost statusa kandidatke za članstvo in s tem povezanih pogajanj.
In some cases, the prospect of becoming candidate countries and the negotiations associated with this could provide a further impetus to full implementation.