natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V nujnih in nepredvidenih primerih lahko institucija na lastno pobudo in v skladu s postopki, določenimi v Pogodbah, predlaga, da se zakonodajnim ukrepom, predlaganim v delovnem programu Komisije, doda ukrep.
In urgent and unforeseen circumstances, an institution may, on its own initiative and in accordance with the procedures laid down in the Treaties, propose adding a legislative measure to those proposed in the Commission Work Programme.
Predsednik prosi Svet za mnenje o delovnem programu Komisije in resoluciji Parlamenta.
The President shall ask the Council to express an opinion on the Commission Work Programme and on Parliament's resolution.
Kadar je predlog naveden v delovnem programu Komisije, lahko pristojni odbor sklene, da bo imenoval poročevalca za spremljanje pripravljalne faze predloga.
In cases where a proposal is listed in the Commission Work Programme the committee responsible may decide to appoint a rapporteur to follow the preparatory phase of the proposal.
Preden pristojni odbor glasuje, vpraša Komisijo, če pripravlja mnenje o pobudi.
Before the committee responsible proceeds to the vote, it shall ask the Commission whether it is preparing an opinion on the initiative.
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, odbor ne sprejme poročila pred prejetjem mnenja Komisije.
In the affirmative, the committee shall not adopt its report before receiving the Commission’s opinion.
Po sklepu o postopku, ki se bo uporabil, če se ne uporabi člen 46, odbor izmed svojih članov ali stalnih namestnikov imenuje poročevalca za predlog zakonodajnega akta, če tega ni že storil na podlagi delovnega programa Komisije, dogovorjenega v skladu s členom 35.
Following a decision on the procedure to be followed, and if Rule 46 does not apply, the committee shall appoint a rapporteur on the proposal for a legislative act from among its members or permanent substitutes if it has not yet done so on the basis of the Commission Work Programme agreed under Rule 35.
Glej Prilogo XXI.
See Annex XXI.
Kadar se načrtuje začetek pogajanj za sklenitev, obnovo ali spremembo mednarodnega sporazuma, se pristojni odbor lahko odloči, da bo pripravil poročilo ali drugače spremljal postopek, in o svoji odločitvi obvesti konferenco predsednikov odborov.
When it is intended to open negotiations on the conclusion, renewal or amendment of an international agreement, the committee responsible may decide to draw up a report or otherwise monitor the procedure and inform the Conference of Committee Chairs of that decision.
Predsedniki in poročevalci pristojnega odbora oziroma pridruženih odborov skupaj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe, da zagotovijo, da se Parlamentu predložijo takojšnje, redne in popolne informacije, po potrebi zaupno, na vseh stopnjah pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih in njihovih sklepanj, vključno z osnutkom in končnim sprejetim besedilom pogajalskih direktiv, pa tudi informacije iz odstavka 3,
The Chairs and rapporteurs of the committee responsible and of any associated committees shall jointly take appropriate action to ensure that Parliament is provided with immediate, regular and full information, if necessary on a confidential basis, at all stages of the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements, including the draft and the finally adopted text of negotiating directives, and with the information referred to in paragraph 3,
s strani Komisije v skladu z njenimi obveznostmi po Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije in zavezami po Okvirnem sporazumu o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Evropsko komisijo, ter
by the Commission in accordance with its obligations under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and its commitments under the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission, and
s strani Sveta v skladu z njegovimi obveznostmi po Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije.
by the Council in accordance with its obligations under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Kadar Komisija v skladu s svojimi obveznostmi iz Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in Okvirnega sporazuma o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Evropsko komisijo obvesti Parlament in Svet o svojem namenu, da predlaga začasno uporabo ali odložitev izvajanja mednarodnega sporazuma, se na plenarnem zasedanju da izjava, ki ji sledi razprava.
Where the Commission, in accordance with its obligations under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission, informs Parliament and the Council of its intention to propose the provisional application or suspension of an international agreement, a statement shall be made in Parliament, followed by a debate.
Enak postopek se uporabi, ko Komisija obvesti Parlament o predlogu v zvezi s stališči, ki naj se v imenu Unije zagovarjajo v telesu, ustanovljenem z mednarodnim sporazumom.
The same procedure shall apply when the Commission informs Parliament of a proposal concerning the positions to be adopted on the Union's behalf in a body set up by an international agreement.
Predstavitve so organizirane tako, da kandidati za komisarja Parlamentu lahko razkrijejo vse ustrezne informacije.
The hearings shall be organised in such a way as to enable Commissioners-designate to disclose to Parliament all relevant information.
Določbe o organizaciji teh predstavitev so navedene v prilogi k temu poslovniku
Provisions relating to the organisation of the hearings shall be laid down in an annex to these Rules of Procedure
Pred vsakim delnim zasedanjem konferenca predsednikov pripravi osnutek dnevnega reda na podlagi priporočil konference predsednikov odborov in ob upoštevanju dogovorjenega delovnega programa Komisije iz člena 35.
Before each part-session the draft agenda shall be drawn up by the Conference of Presidents on the basis of recommendations by the Conference of Committee Chairs taking into account the agreed Commission Work Programme referred to in Rule 35.
Določbe tega odstavka se razlagajo v skladu s točko 50 Okvirnega sporazuma o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Evropsko komisijo
Provisions of this paragraph shall be interpreted in accordance with the point 50 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission
smernice in pravila ravnanja, ki so jih sprejeli ustrezni organi Parlamenta (priloge XVI, XVII, XVIII in XXI).
guidelines and codes of conduct adopted by the relevant bodies of Parliament (Annexes XVI, XVII, XVIII and XXI).
Vprašanje ni dopustno, če je bilo enako ali podobno vprašanje v preteklih treh mesecih že postavljeno in je bilo nanj odgovorjeno, ali v primeru, da zahteva le take informacije o nadaljnjih ukrepih po določeni resoluciji Parlamenta, ki jih je Komisija že dala v pisnem sporočilu o nadaljnjih ukrepih, razen če je prišlo do novih sprememb ali če spraševalec prosi za nadaljnje informacije.
A question shall be inadmissible if an identical or similar question has been put down and answered during the preceding three months, or to the extent that it merely seeks information on the follow-up to a specific resolution of Parliament of a kind which the Commission has already provided in a written follow-up communication, unless there are new developments or the author is seeking further information.
Če je bilo enako ali podobno vprašanje zastavljeno v predhodnih šestih mesecih in je nanj že prispel odgovor, ali v primeru, da zahteva le take informacije o nadaljnjih ukrepih po določeni resoluciji Parlamenta, ki jih je Komisija že dala v pisnem sporočilu o nadaljnjih ukrepih, sekretariat pošlje avtorju kopijo predhodnega vprašanja in odgovora.
If an identical or similar question has been put and answered during the preceding six months, or to the extent that a question merely seeks information on the follow-up to a specific resolution of Parliament of a kind which the Commission has already provided in a written follow-up communication, the Secretariat shall transmit a copy of the previous question and answer to the author.
Sankcije: v primeru kršitve predsednik odbora ravna v skladu s členi 9(2), 152, 153 in 154.
Penalties: in cases of infringement, the chair of the committee shall proceed in accordance with Rules 9(2), 152, 153 and 154.
Pritožba je mogoča v roku dveh let od dne, ko se je pritožnik seznanil z dejstvi, na katerih pritožba temelji, pred tem pa je moral že uporabiti ustrezna upravna sredstva pri zadevnih institucijah in organih.
A complaint shall be made within two years of the date on which the facts on which it is based came to the attention of the person lodging the complaint and must be preceded by the appropriate administrative approaches to the institutions and bodies concerned.
Sklep evropskega varuha človekovih pravic o sprejetju izvedbenih določb
Decision of the European Ombudsman adopting implementing provisions
Sprejeto 8. julija 2002 in spremenjeno s sklepoma varuha človekovih pravic z dne 5. aprila 2004 in 3. decembra 2008.
Adopted on 8 July 2002 and amended by decisions of the Ombudsman of 5 April 2004 and 3 December 2008.
"statut" pomeni predpise in splošne pogoje, ki urejajo opravljanje nalog varuha človekovih pravic;
"the Statute" means the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties;
izraz "zaupen" v zvezi z dokumenti in informacijami pomeni "ki se ne razkrije".
in relation to documents and information, "confidential" means "not to be disclosed".
Na podlagi meril, določenih v Pogodbi in Statutu, varuh človekovih pravic določi, ali je pritožba v okviru njegovih pristojnosti, in če je tako, ali je dopustna; od pritožnika lahko pred odločitvijo zahteva predložitev dodatnih informacij ali dokumentov.
On the basis of the criteria laid down in the Treaty and the Statute, the Ombudsman determines whether a complaint is within his mandate and if so, whether it is admissible; he may request the complainant to provide further information or documents before making the determination.
Varuh človekovih pravic lahko obvesti tudi pristojno institucijo.
The Ombudsman may also inform the institution concerned.
Kopijo pritožbe pošlje pristojni instituciji in jo pozove, da v določenem roku, ki običajno ni daljši od treh mesecev, poda svoje mnenje.
He transmits a copy of the complaint to the institution concerned and invites it to submit an opinion within a specified time that is normally no more than three months.
Mnenje ne sme vsebovati nobenih informacij ali dokumentov, ki so po mnenju pristojne institucije zaupni.
The opinion shall not include any information or documents which the institution concerned regards as confidential.
Pristojna institucija lahko zahteva, da se določeni deli mnenja, ki ga je oblikovala, razkrijejo samo pritožniku.
The institution concerned may request that certain parts of its opinion be disclosed only to the complainant.
Zadevne dele mora jasno opredeliti in razložiti razlog ali razloge za zahtevo po njihovem razkritju.
It shall clearly identify the parts concerned and shall explain the reason or reasons for its request.
Če varuh človekovih pravic meni, da je potrebna nadaljnja preiskava, jo izvede.
If he considers it useful to do so, the Ombudsman makes further inquiries.
Točke 4.3 do 4.6 se nanašajo na nadaljnjo preiskavo in opredeljujejo, da je običajni rok za odgovor pristojnih institucij en mesec.
Points 4.3 to 4.6 apply to further inquiries, save that the time limit for the institution concerned to reply is normally one month.
Če varuh človekovih pravic meni, da je uporaba poenostavljenega postopka primerna, da se doseže hitra rešitev, ga lahko uporabi.
Where he considers it appropriate to do so, the Ombudsman may use a simplified procedure, with a view to achieving a rapid solution.
Ko varuh človekovih pravic konča preiskave, primer zaključi z utemeljenim sklepom ter o tem obvesti pritožnika in pristojno institucijo.
When he has completed his inquiries. the Ombudsman closes the case with a reasoned decision and informs the complainant and the institution concerned.
Ob upoštevanju pogojev, določenih v Statutu, lahko varuh človekovih pravic od institucij in organov Skupnosti ter organov držav članic zahteva, da mu v razumnem roku pošljejo informacije ali dokumente za namene preiskave.
Subject to the conditions laid down in the Statute, the Ombudsman may require Community institutions and bodies and the authorities of Member States to supply, within a reasonable time, information or documents for the purposes of an inquiry.
Jasno morajo opredeliti vse informacije ali dokumente, za katere menijo, da so zaupni.
They shall clearly identify any information or documents which they regard as confidential.
Varuh človelovih pravic lahko pregleda spis pristojne institucije.
The Ombudsman may inspect the file of the institution concerned.
Pristojna institucija jasno opredeli vse dokumente v spisu, za katere meni, da so zaupni.
The institution concerned shall clearly identify any documents in the file which it regards as confidential.
Varuh človekovih pravic lahko napravi kopije celega spisa ali posameznih dokumentov, ki jih spis vsebuje.
The Ombudsman may take copies of the whole file or of specific documents contained in the file.
Varuh človekovih pravic lahko odloči, da mora oseba, ki dokaze posreduje, to storiti zaupno.
The Ombudsman may decide that the person giving evidence shall do so in confidence.
Varuh človekovih pravic lahko od institucij in organov Skupnosti zahteva, naj ukrenejo vse potrebno, da bi lahko svojo preiskavo opravil na kraju samem.
The Ombudsman may request Community institutions and bodies to make arrangements for him to pursue his inquiries on the spot.
Če varuh človekovih pravic ugotovi nepravilnosti, si čim bolj prizadeva sodelovati s pristojno institucijo pri iskanju sporazumne rešitve za odpravo nepravilnosti in v zadovoljitev pritožnika.
If the Ombudsman finds maladministration, as far as possible he co-operates with the institution concerned in seeking a friendly solution to eliminate it and to satisfy the complainant.
Če varuh človekovih pravic meni, da je bilo tako sodelovanje uspešno, primer zaključi z utemeljenim sklepom.
If the Ombudsman considers that such cooperation has been successful, he closes the case with a reasoned decision.
Varuh človekovih pravic oblikuje kritično oceno, kadar meni:
The Ombudsman makes a critical remark if he considers:
Kadar varuh človekovih pravic zaključi primer s kritično oceno, o tem obvesti pritožnika in pristojno institucijo.
When the Ombudsman closes the case with a critical remark, he informs the complainant and the institution concerned.
lahko pristojna institucija odpravi nepravilnost ali
that it is possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the instance of maladministration, or
Varuh človekovih pravic pošlje izvod svojega poročila in osnutka priporočil pristojni instituciji in pritožniku.
The Ombudsman sends a copy of his report and draft recommendations to the institution concerned and to the complainant.
Pristojna institucija v treh mesecih pošlje varuhu človekovih pravic podrobno mnenje.
The institution concerned sends the Ombudsman a detailed opinion within three months.
Pritožnik nima dostopa do:
The complainant shall not have access to:
dokumentov ali informacij, pridobljenih na podlagi člena 5.1 ali 5.2, ki so bili ob posredovanju varuhu človekovih pravic opredeljeni kot zaupni;
documents or information obtained by virtue of Article 5.1 or 5.2 above which have been identified to the Ombudsman as confidential;
dokazov, ki so bili posredovani zaupno v skladu s členom 5.3.
evidence given in confidence in accordance with Article 5.3 above.
Javnost ima dostop do dokumentov varuha človekovih pravic, ki niso povezani s preiskavami, ob upoštevanju istih pogojev in omejitev, kot so določeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001
The public shall have access to documents held by the Ombudsman, which do not relate to inquiries, subject to the same conditions and limits as those laid down by Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001
o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije.
for public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
Javnost lahko zahteva dostop do dokumentov varuha človekovih pravic, povezanih s preiskavo, če pritožba v skladu s členom 10.1 na zahtevo pritožnika ali varuha človekovih pravic ni bila opredeljena za zaupno.
The public may request access to inquiry-related documents held by the Ombudsman, provided that the complaint has not been classified as confidential at the request of the complainant, or by the Ombudsman pursuant to Article 10.1 above.
Dostop ne bo omogočen do:
Access shall not be given to:
dokazov, ki so bili poslani zaupno v skladu s členom 5.3;
evidence given in confidence, in accordance with Article 5.3 above;
tistih delov mnenj in odgovorov pristojne institucije na vse nadaljnje preiskave, za katere je ta v skladu s členom 4.5 zahtevala, da se lahko razkrijejo samo pritožniku.
those parts of its opinion and replies to any further inquiries which, in accordance with Article 4.5 above, the institution concerned has requested should be disclosed only to the complainant.
Prosilec bo obveščen o razlogu ali razlogih, ki jih je pristojna institucija navedla v zvezi z njegovo zahtevo;
The applicant shall be informed of the reason or reasons which the institution concerned has given for its request;
dokumenta, katerega razkritje bi omajalo neoporečnost trenutne preiskave.
a document the disclosure of which would prejudice the integrity of an on-going inquiry.
Dostop se omogoči na kraju samem ali z dostavitvijo kopije.
Access is given on the spot or by providing a copy.
Odločbe o prošnjah za dostop javnosti do drugih dokumentov se izdajo v 15 delovnih dneh od prejema prošenj.
Decisions on applications for public access are made within 15 working days from receipt.
Izjemoma se rok lahko podaljša za 15 delovnih dni; prosilec je vnaprej obveščen o podaljšanju, navedeni pa so tudi podrobni razlogi.
In exceptional cases, the time-limit may be extended by 15 working days; the applicant is notified in advance of the extension and detailed reasons are given.
Varuh človekovih pravic v svojih postopkih uporablja enega izmed jezikov Pogodbe; v primeru pritožbe je to jezik, v katerem je ta napisana.
The language of proceedings conducted by the Ombudsman is one of the Treaty languages; in the case of a complaint, the language in which it is written.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic v Uradnem listu objavlja sporočila o sprejetju letnega poročila in posebnih poročil, pri čemer javno pojasni, da lahko vsi zainteresirani dostopajo do polnih besedil dokumentov.
The European Ombudsman shall publish in the Official Journal announcements concerning the adoption of annual and special reports, making public the means for all interested to have access to the full text of the documents.
Vsa poročila ali povzetki odločitev varuha človekovih pravic, ki zadevajo zaupne pritožbe, se objavijo v obliki, ki onemogoča identifikacijo pritožnika.
Any reports or summaries of the Ombudsman’s decisions concerning confidential complaints are published in a form that does not allow the complainant to be identified.
Izvedbene določbe, sprejete 16. oktobra 1997, se razveljavijo.
The implementing provisions adopted on 16 October 1997 are repealed.
Ta sklep začne veljati 1. januarja 2003.
This decision shall come into effect on 1 January 2003.
Predsednik Evropskega parlamenta je obveščen o sprejetju tega sklepa.
The President of the European Parliament shall be informed of the adoption of this decision.
Sklep Parlamenta z dne 20. oktobra 2010.
Parliament's decision of 20 October 2010.
in Evropska komisija (v nadaljevanju "instituciji"),
and the European Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the two Institutions"),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), zlasti člena 295 Pogodbe, in Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo (v nadaljevanju "Pogodbe"),
having regard to the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular Article 295 thereof, and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (hereinafter referred to as "the Treaties"),
in zlasti členov 105, 106 in 127 Poslovnika ter Prilog VIII in XIV k Poslovniku,
, and in particular Rules 105, 106 and 127 thereof and Annexes VIII and XIV thereto,
ob upoštevanju političnih smernic in ustreznih izjav novoizvoljenega predsednika Komisije 15. septembra 2009 in 9. februarja 2010 ter izjav vseh kandidatov za člane Komisije med njihovimi predstavitvami v parlamentarnih odborih,
having regard to the political guidelines issued, and the relevant statements made, by the President-elect of the Commission on 15 September 2009 and 9 February 2010 and the statements made by each of the candidate Members of the Commission in the course of their hearings by parliamentary committees,
ker Lizbonska pogodba krepi demokratično legitimnost postopka odločanja Unije,
whereas the Lisbon Treaty strengthens the democratic legitimacy of the Union's decision-making process,
ker instituciji pripisujeta velik pomen učinkovitemu prenosu in izvajanju zakonodaje Unije,
whereas the two Institutions attach the utmost importance to the effective transposition and implementation of Union law,
ker ta okvirni sporazum ne vpliva na pooblastila in pristojnosti Parlamenta, Komisije ali katere koli druge institucije ali organa Unije, temveč želi zagotoviti, da bi se ta pooblastila in pristojnosti kar najbolj učinkovito in pregledno izvajala,
whereas this Framework Agreement does not affect the powers and prerogatives of Parliament, the Commission or any other institution or organ of the Union but seeks to ensure that those powers and prerogatives are exercised as effectively and transparently as possible,
ker bi bilo treba ta okvirni sporazum razlagati v skladu z institucionalnim okvirom, kakor je urejen s Pogodbami,
whereas this Framework Agreement should be interpreted in conformity with the institutional framework as organised by the Treaties,
ker bo Komisija ustrezno upoštevala vloge, ki jih Pogodbe podeljujejo Parlamentu in Svetu, zlasti v zvezi s temeljnim načelom enakega obravnavanja iz točke 9,
whereas the Commission will take due account of the respective roles conferred by the Treaties on Parliament and the Council, in particular with reference to the basic principle of equal treatment laid down under point 9,
ker je treba posodobiti okvirni sporazum, sklenjen maja 2005
whereas it is appropriate to update the Framework Agreement concluded in May 2005
Da bi se bolje odrazilo novo „posebno partnerstvo“ med Parlamentom in Komisijo se instituciji sporazumeta o naslednjih ukrepih za okrepitev politične odgovornosti in legitimnosti Komisije, širitev konstruktivnega dialoga, izboljšanje pretoka informacij med institucijama ter sodelovanja pri postopkih in načrtovanju.
To better reflect the new "special partnership" between Parliament and the Commission, the two Institutions agree on the following measures to strengthen the political responsibility and legitimacy of the Commission, extend constructive dialogue, improve the flow of information between the two Institutions and improve cooperation on procedures and planning.
Sporazumeta se tudi o specifičnih določbah:
They also agree on specific provisions:
srečanjih Komisije z nacionalnimi strokovnjaki, kakor določa Priloga 1;
on Commission meetings with national experts, as set out in Annex 1;
pošiljanju zaupnih informacij Parlamentu, kakor določa Priloga 2,
on the forwarding of confidential information to Parliament, as set out in Annex 2;
pogajanjih o mednarodnih sporazumih in njihovi sklenitvi, kakor določa Priloga 3; in
on the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements, as set out in Annex 3; and
ter o časovnem razporedu delovnega programa Komisije, navedenem v Prilogi 4.
on the timetable for the Commission Work Programme, as set out in Annex 4.