natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
UL L 078, 15.3.2006. ,
OJ L 078, 15.3.2006. ,
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka,
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
– ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo z dne 7. novembra 2002 o financiranju Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije, ki dopolnjuje Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 6. maja 1999 med Evropskim Parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund supplementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne ... o mobilizaciji Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije v znesku 106.357.627 evrov za zagotovitev pomoči Bolgariji, Romuniji in Avstriji pri veliki škodi, ki so jo povzročile poplave od aprila do avgusta 2005,
– having regard to the decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of .... to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to the amount of EUR 106 357 627 to grant financial assistance to Bulgaria, Romania and Austria in order to help those countries to cope with the severe damage caused by floods between April and August 2005,
– ob upoštevanju Predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna št. 1/2006 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, ki ga je Komisija predložila dne 10. marca 2006 (SEC(2006)325),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 1/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, which the Commission presented on 10 March 2006 (SEC(2006)325),
– ob upoštevanju Predloga spremembe proračuna št. 1/2006, ki ga je Svet pripravil dne ….
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 1/2006, which the Council established on ...
– ob upoštevanju člena 69 in Priloge IV svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 69 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6-0139/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0139/2006 ),
A. ker bi morala Evropska unija pokazati solidarnost s prebivalci regij držav članic, ki so jih prizadele naravne nesreče, katerih posledice se resno odražajo na življenjskih razmerah, naravnem okolju ali ekonomiji,
A. whereas the European Union should show its solidarity with the population of regions of Member States affected by natural disasters which have serious repercussions on living conditions, the natural environment or the economy,
B. ker so bila ustrezna proračunska sredstva finančne pomoči Evropske unije sproščena v skladu z določbami Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije in Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 7. novembra 2002, ki ureja njegovo financiranje,
B. whereas the appropriate budgetary resources for the European Union's financial assistance have been mobilised in accordance with the provisions of the European Union Solidarity Fund and of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 relating to its financing,
C. ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 1/2006 formalna vključitev teh proračunskih virov v proračun 2006,
C. whereas the purpose of Draft amending budget No 1/2006 is to formally enter these budgetary resources in the 2006 budget,
Močne poplave so med aprilom in avgustom 2005 prizadele večje predele osrednje in vzhodne Evrope ter povzročile veliko škodo v veliko državah.
Between April and August 2005 severe floods hit large parts of central and eastern Europe causing severe damage in a number of countries.
Bolgarija, Romunija in Avstrija so v zvezi z nevihto v desettedenskem roku, ki ga določa člen 4 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002
Within the ten week deadline set by Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije, (UL L 311, 14.11.2002, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p 3).
3). , zaprosile za finančno pomoč iz Solidarnostnega sklada EU.
Bulgaria, Romania and Austria applied for financial assistance from the EU Solidarity Fund relating to the storm.
V PPSP 1, predstavljenem 10. marca 2006, Komisija predlaga pomoč v naslednjih zneskih:
In their PDAB 1 presented on 10 March 2006, the Commission proposes to grant the following amounts:
Neposredna škoda
Direct damage
Znesek na osnovi 2,5 %
Amount based on 2.5 %
Znesek na osnovi 6 %
Amount based on 6 %
Skupni znesek predlagane pomoči (v evrih)
Total amount of aid proposed (in EUR)
Bolgarija: poplave avgust 2005
Bulgaria: Floods August 2005
Romunija: poplave april/maj 2005
Romania: Floods April/May 2005
Romunija: poplave julij/avgust 2005
Romania: Floods July/August 2005
avgust 2005
August 2005
Celotni letni proračun, ki je na voljo za solidarnostni sklad, znaša milijardo evrov.
The total annual budget available for the Solidarity Fund is EUR 1 billion.
V letu 2006 se še ni namenilo sredstev za zgodnejše vloge, zato je na razpolago še milijarda evrov.
In 2006, no resources have already been earmarked for earlier applications leaving EUR 1 billion available.
Po izplačilu predlaganega zneska bo na voljo ostalo še vsaj 25 % sredstev Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije za razporeditev v zadnjem četrtletju, kot predvideva člen 4(2) uredbe 2012/2002.
The amount proposed will leave at least 25 % of the European Union Solidarity Fund available for allocation during the last quarter of the year, as required by Article 4(2) of Regulation 2012/2002.
Ker je bila solidarnost osrednja utemeljitev za oblikovanje sklada, Komisija meni, da se mora pomoč iz sklada stopnjevati.
As solidarity was the central justification for the creation of the Fund, the Commission takes the view that aid from the Fund should be progressive.
To pomeni, da je treba v skladu z dosedanjo prakso za del škode, ki presega prag (0,6 % BND ali 3 milijarde evrov v cenah iz leta 2002, upošteva se znesek, ki je nižji), zahtevati večjo intenzivnost pomoči kot pri škodi, ki je nižja od praga.
That means that, according to previous practice, the portion of the damage exceeding the threshold (0.6 % of the GNI or EUR 3 billion in 2002 prices, whichever is the lower amount) should give rise to higher aid intensity than damage up to the threshold.
Stopnja za določanje razporeditve sredstev za velike nesreče, ki je bila v uporabi v preteklosti, znaša 2,5 % celotne neposredne škode pod pragom 6 % škode in nad njim.
The rate applied in the past for defining the allocations for major disasters is 2.5 % of total direct damage under the threshold and 6 % above.
Predlaga se, da se enaka razmerja uporabi tudi v tem primeru.
It is proposed to apply the same percentages in this case.
Vaš poročevalec spet obžaluje, da trenutni postopki ne dovoljujejo hitrejše obdelave prošenj za solidarnostni sklad.
Once again, your rapporteur can only regret that the current procedures do not allow for a speedier processing of requests to the Solidarity Fund.
Zato so države članice, ki potrebujejo finančno pomoč, soočene z nepotrebnimi zamudami, v tem primeru enega leta !
Thus, Member States in need of financial assistance are subjected to unnecessary delays, in this case of one full year !
Poročevalec upa, da bodo z novim medinstitucionalnim sporazumom, o katerem trenutno potekajo pogajanja, začela veljati nova pravila, ki bodo Uniji omogočila, da se hitreje odzove na naravne nesreče v kateri od držav članic.
Your rapporteur hopes that with the new Interinstitutional Agreement currently under negotiation new rules will come into force which will enable the Union to react more quickly to natural disasters in one of its Member States.
Nesprejemljivo je, da nujno pomoč praviloma hitreje prejmejo tretje države kot pa države članice Unije.
It is unacceptable that, as a general rule, emergency aid takes much longer within the Union than when granted to third countries.
Predlog spremembe proračuna št. 1/2006 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006 (Poplave v Bolgariji, Romuniji in Avstriji)
Draft amending budget No 1/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006 (Floods in Bulgaria, Romania and Austria
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o ukrepih za obnovo staleža evropske jegulje
on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European Eel
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o ukrepih za obnovo staleža evropske jegulje
on the proposal for a Council regulation on establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European Eel
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0472 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0472 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0326/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0326/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0140/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0140/2006 ),
(4a) 15. novembra 2005 je Evropski parlament sprejel resolucijo¹, v kateri je pozval Komisijo, naj nemudoma predloži predlog uredbe za obnovo staleža evropske jegulje.
(4a) On 15 November 2005 the European Parliament adopted a resolution 1 calling on the Commission to immediately submit a proposal for a regulation for the recovery of European eel stocks.
1 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0425 .
1 Texts Adopted, P6_ TA( 2005)0425.
(8) Uspeh ukrepov za obnovitev staleža evropske jegulje je odvisen od tesnega sodelovanja in skladnega delovanja na ravni Skupnosti, držav članic in na lokalni ravni kot tudi od informacij, posvetovanja in vključevanja vpletenih javnih sektorjev.
(8) The success of measures for the recovery of the European eel stock depends on close cooperation and coherent action at Community, Member State and local level as well as on information, consultation and involvement of the public sectors involved.
(8) Uspeh ukrepov za obnovitev staleža evropske jegulje je odvisen od tesnega sodelovanja in skladnega delovanja na ravni Skupnosti, držav članic in na lokalni ter regionalni ravni kot tudi od informacij, posvetovanja in vključevanja vpletenih javnih sektorjev.
(8) The success of measures for the recovery of the European eel stock depends on close cooperation and coherent action at Community, Member State and local and regional level as well as on information, consultation and involvement of the public sectors involved.
Besedilo je prilagojeno tako, da odraža pravni in upravni položaj v nekaterih državah članicah, kjer urejanje tega ribištva sodi v pristojnost institucionalnih enot regionalne ravni države ali pa slednje pristojnost zanj delijo z institucionalno enoto centralne ravni države.
The text has been adapted to reflect the legal and administrative situation in some of the Member States, where regulating this fishery falls within the competence of regional governments or is shared with the central government .
(10) V povodju, kjer imajo lahko ribištvo in druge človekove dejavnosti, ki vplivajo na jegulje, čezmejne učinke, morajo biti vsi programi in ukrepi usklajeni za celotno ustrezno povodje.
(10) Within a river basin where fisheries and other human activities affecting eels may have transboundary effects, all programmes and measures should be coordinated for the whole of the relevant river basin.
Za povodja, ki se raztezajo preko meja Skupnosti, si mora Skupnost prizadevati, da bi zagotovila primerno usklajenost z zadevnimi tretjimi državami.
For river basins extending beyond the boundaries of the Community, the Community should endeavour to ensure appropriate coordination with the third countries concerned.
Vendar potreba po taki koordinaciji ne sme preprečiti nujnih ukrepov držav članic –
However, the need for such coordination should not prevent urgent action being taken by Member States.
Vendar pa usklajevanje ne sme potekati na račun hitre uvedbe nacionalnih delov načrtov za upravljanje z jeguljami.
However, coordination must not take place at the expense of the rapid introduction of the national parts of Eel Management Plans.
V okviru mednarodnega usklajevanja, tako znotraj Skupnosti kot izven nje, je treba posebno pozornost nameniti Baltiškemu morju in evropskim obalnim vodam, ki so zunaj področja uporabe okvirne direktive o vodah.
In the context of international coordination, both within the Community and outside it, special attention should be devoted to the Baltic Sea and European coastal waters falling outside the scope of the Water Framework Directive.
Ukrepi za obnovo staleža evropske jegulje niso omejeni le na vode Skupnosti.
Measures to restore stocks of the European eel are not confined to Community waters .
(10a) Ker se naravno velik del zaroda jegulj s selitvijo izgubi, bi morala Komisija nemudoma raziskati, kako bi lahko evropsko ribogojstvo prispevalo k obnovi staleža evropskih jegulj, med drugim s stalnim gojenjem zaroda jegulj, ki so bile ujete, dokler te ne odrastejo v rumene jegulje in se uporabijo za obnovo staleža v evropskih celinskih vodah, povezanih z morjem.
(10a) As, naturally, many of the arriving glass eels are lost, the Commission should without delay investigate how Europe's aquaculture could be involved in the recovery of European eel stocks, inter alia by means of continued rearing of glass eels which have been caught, until they develop into yellow eels and are used to restock European inland waters communicating with the sea.
(10b) V okviru obnove staleža evropske jegulje je opaziti, da je zarod jegulj posebej izpostavljen, ker se velike količine zaroda jegulj izvažajo.
(10b) In the context of the recovery of the European eel stock, it is noted that the glass eel is particularly vulnerable because large quantities of glass eels are exported.
Zato je treba izvajati posebne ukrepe za povečanje števila zaroda jegulj, izpuščenega v evropske vode.
Special measures to increase the numbers of glass eels released into European waters should therefore be implemented.
Ker je zarod jegulj posebej izpostavljen del staleža jegulj, zaradi velikega povpraševanja in izvoza, je treba izvajati posebne ukrepe za povečanje števila zaroda jegulj, izpuščenega v evropske vode.
Since glass eels are a particularly vulnerable part of the eel stock, owing to heavy demand and exports, special measures should be implemented to increase the numbers of glass eels released into European waters.
Od prvega do petnajstega dne vsak mesec se prepove ribolov, ulov in zadržanje vrste Anguilla anguilla.
From the first to the fifteenth day of each month it shall be prohibited to fish for, land or retain eel of the species Anguilla anguilla .
Ribolovna sezona se skrajša tako, da se ribolovni napor zmanjša za polovico.
The fishing season shall be shortened so that fishing effort is reduced by half.
Čeprav je v času, ko se pripravljajo načrti, treba sprejeti nujne ukrepe, 15-dnevni lovopust na vsakih 15 dni še zdaleč ni najustreznejša metoda.
Even though it appears necessary to take urgent measures while the plans are drawn up, alternate 15-day closures are far from being the most suitable method.
Prvič, ribolov jegulj je odvisen od luninih men, zato lahko ta ukrep povzroči skoraj popoln lovopust, lahko pa po drugi strani nima nikakršnega učinka.
Firstly, since eel fishing depends on the lunar cycle, this measure may cause virtually the total closure of the fishery or, on the other hand, it may have no impact whatever.
Drugič, ukrep poleg ribolova prepoveduje ulov in zadržanje jegulj.
Secondly, the measure prohibits the landing and retention of eel as well as fishing.
To bi lahko imelo za trgovska podjetja zelo škodljive posledice, saj si ne morejo privoščiti zaposlovanja delovne sile 15 dni mesečno ali priprave potrebne infrastrukture, ki bi se nato ne uporabljala.
This may have a highly damaging effect on marketing firms, which cannot afford to employ staff for 15 days a month, or to set up the necessary infrastructure and then have to leave it idle.
Če naj se ribolovni napor zmanjša za polovico, je to treba storiti v okviru nepretrganega obdobja, s skrajšanjem ribolovne sezone.
If effort is to be reduced by half, it should be done on the basis of a continual period by shortening the fishing season.
Člen 3, uvodno besedilo
Article 3, introductory wording
Z odstopanjem od člena 2 je do 30. junija 2007 dovoljeno loviti, obdržati in izvleči jegulje vrste Anguilla anguilla od prvega do petnajstega dne v vsakem mesecu pod pogojem, da:
By way of derogation from Article 2, until 30 June 2007 it shall be permitted to fish for, to retain and to land eel of the species Anguilla anguilla from the first to the fifteenth day of each month provided that:
Z odstopanjem od člena 2 je do 30. junija 2007 dovoljeno loviti, obdržati in izvleči jegulje vrste Anguilla anguilla izven določene ribolovne sezone pod pogojem, da:
By way of derogation from Article 2, until 30 June 2007 it shall be permitted to fish for, to retain and to land eel of the species Anguilla anguilla outside the fishing season laid down provided that:
Ker se v predlogu spremembe člena 2 predlaga, kot nujni ukrep, skrajšanje sezone namesto 15-dnevnega lovopusta, je treba v skladu s tako določeno ribolovno sezono določiti tudi te izjeme.
Given that the amendment to Article 2 proposes replacing the 15-day closure with a shortened season as an emergency measure, the exemptions should also be defined in line with the fishing season laid down.
(b) so vse ulovljene jegulje izpuščene v evropske celinske vode, ki imajo dostop do morja za namene porasta ravni odseljevanja odraslih srebrnih jegulj.
(b) all the eel captured are released into European inland waters having access to the sea for the purpose of increasing the escapement levels of adult silver eels
(b) so vse ulovljene jegulje izpuščene v evropske celinske vode, ki imajo dostop do morja za namene porasta ravni odseljevanja odraslih srebrnih jegulj ali se uporabijo za ribogojstvo v Evropski uniji, pod pogojem, da se odstotek, ki ga Komisija določi za jegulje, uporabi za vzrejo in obnovo staleža rumenih jegulj v evropskih celinskih vodah, povezanih z morjem, da bi povečali raven odseljevanja odraslih srebrnih jegulj in
(b) - all the eel captured are released into European inland waters having access to the sea for the purpose of increasing the escapement levels of adult silver eels or - are used for aquaculture in the European Union, subject to the condition that a percentage, to be determined by the Commission, of the eel used in aquaculture is used for the breeding of and restocking with yellow eels in European inland waters communicating with the sea, in order to increase the escape rate of mature silver eels, and
Člen 3, točka (b a) (novo)
Article 3, point (b a) (new)
(ba) države članice sprejmejo dodatne ukrepe za čim manjše oviranje naravne selitve zaroda jegulj v določenih obdobjih.
( ba ) Member States adopt extra measures to obstruct as little as possible the natural migration of glass eels during certain periods.
V obdobjih, ko se zarod jegulj seli iz obalnih področij v notranjost, je treba v največji možni meri odstraniti obstoječe ovire.
In those periods when glass eels migrate inland from coastal areas, the obstacles which exist should be removed in so far as possible.
Če obstoječi nacionalni ukrepi za določena povodja že zagotavljajo, da je cilj iz člena 6(4) izpolnjen, lahko zadevna država članica do 30. junija 2007 predloži prošnjo za izjemo pri ukrepih, predvidenih v členu 2 za omenjena povodja.
If existing national measures already ensure, for specified river basins, that the objective referred to in Article 6(4) is met, the Member State concerned may submit a request for exemption until 30 June 2007 from the measures provided for in Article 2 for those basins.
Če obstoječi nacionalni ukrepi za določena povodja že zagotavljajo, da je cilj iz člena 6(4) izpolnjen, lahko zadevna država članica do 30. junija 2008 predloži prošnjo za izjemo pri ukrepih, predvidenih v členu 2 za omenjena povodja.
If existing national measures already ensure, for specified river basins, that the objective referred to in Article 6(4) is met, the Member State concerned may submit a request for exemption until 30 June 2008 from the measures provided for in Article 2 for those basins.
Dodatna zaščita zaroda jegulj
Additional protection for glass eels
Ribolov jegulj, krajših od 12 cm, je dovoljen, če je izpolnjena ena od naslednjih zahtev:
Fishing for eels less than 12 cm long is allowed, providing one of the following requirements is fulfilled:
(a) večina ujetih jegulj se uporabi za obnovo staleža v evropskih celinskih vodah, povezanih z morjem, da bi povečali raven odseljevanja odraslih srebrnih jegulj;
(a) most of the eels caught are used to restock European inland waters communicating with the sea, in order to increase the escape rate of mature silver eels ;
(b) za jegulje, ujete za ribogojstvo v Evropski uniji, velja pogoj, da se odstotek, ki ga Komisija določi za jegulje, uporabljene v ribogojstvu, uporabi za gojenje zaroda jegulj in obnovo staleža v evropskih celinskih vodah, povezanih z morjem, da bi povečali raven odseljevanja odraslih srebrnih jegulj.
(b) eels caught for aquaculture in the European Union are subject to the condition that a percentage, to be determined by the Commission, of the eel used in aquaculture is used for rearing eel fry and restocking European inland waters communicating with the sea, in order to increase the escape rate of mature silver eels.
Na željo države članice lahko Komisija določi kvoto za izvoz zaroda jegulj, če to ne posega v merila trajnostnega razvoja ali v obnavljanje staleža evropske jegulje.
If a Member State so wishes, the Commission may also institute a quota for exports of glass eels, provided that this does not violate the sustainability criterion or the recovery of the stock of European eel.
Če je ulov zaroda jegulj v državi članici ali regiji namenjen za prehrano, lahko Komisija to dovoli, če ne posega v merila trajnostnega razvoja.
If in a Member State or region the catch of glass eel is used for consumption, the Commission may allow this provided that this does not violate the sustainability criterion.
Z odstopanjem od člena 2 je od 1. julija 2007 dovoljeno loviti, obdržati in izvleči jegulje vrste Anguilla anguilla od prvega do petnajstega dne v vsakem mesecu pod pogojem, da je tako ribištvo v skladu s tehničnimi zahtevami in omejitvami, določenimi v načrtu za upravljanje z jeguljami.
By way of derogation from Article 2, from 1 July 2007 it shall be permitted to fish for, to retain and to land eel of the species Anguilla anguilla from the first to the fifteenth day of each month provided that such fisheries conform to the specifications and restrictions set out in an Eel Management Plan.
Z odstopanjem od člena 2 mora biti od 1. julija 2008 ribištvo v skladu s tehničnimi zahtevami in omejitvami, določenimi v načrtu za upravljanje z jeguljami.
By way of derogation from Article 2, from 1 July 2008 fisheries shall conform to the specifications and restrictions set out in an Eel Management Plan.
V skladu z vloženim predlogom spremembe člena 2.
Consistent with the amendment tabled to Article 2.
Za države članice, ki so načrt za upravljanje z jeguljami pred 31. decembrom 2006 predložile v odobritev Komisiji, se veljavnost člena 2 odloži, dokler Komisija ne sprejme dokončne odločitve.
For Member States which have submitted an Eel Management Plan to the Commission for approval before 31 December 2006, the effect of Article 2 shall be suspended until the Commission takes a definitive decision.