natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Samodejno priznavanje teh izjem bo ne samo odpravilo te neprijetnosti, ampak tudi zagotovilo spodbudo za nacionalne organe, da pri odobritvi izjem ravnajo zelo pazljivo.
Automatic recognition of these exemptions would not only eliminate these inconveniences but also provide an incentive for national authorities to proceed very carefully when granting exemptions.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2, TOČKA B A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT B A (new)
ba) Točka 4.3.2 se nadomesti z:
ba) Point 4.3.2 shall be amended as follows:
To je nujna posledica spremembe Direktive 74/408/EGS o sedežih, pritrdiščih in naslonih za glavo.
Follows on necessarily from the amendment to Directive 74/408/EEC relating to motor vehicles with regard to the seats, their anchorages and head restraints.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2, TOČKA C A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT C A (new)
Priloga I, točka 5.4.6 naslov (Direktiva 76/115/EGS)
Annex I, point 5.4.6 (Directive 76/115/EEC)
ca) Naslov točke 5.4.6 se nadomesti z:
ca) The title of point 5.4.6 shall be amended as follows:
To je nujna posledica spremembe Direktive 74/408/EGS o sedežih, pritrdiščih in naslonih za glavo.
This is a necessary consequence of the amendment to Directive 74/408/EEC relating to motor vehicles with regard to the seats, their anchorages and head restraints.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2, TOČKA C B (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT C B (new)
Priloga I, dodatek 1, razpredelnica (Direktiva 76/115/EGS)
Annex I, Appendix 1, table (Directive 76/115/EEC)
Kategorija vozil
Vehicle category
Naprej obrnjeni sedeži
Forward facing seating positions
Nazaj obrnjeni sedeži
Rear facing
Vstran obrnjeni sedeži
Side facing
3 ali 2 Æ
3 or 2 Æ
3 ali 2 *
3 or 2 *
3 ali 2 z
3 or 2 z
N 1 , N 2 in N 3
N 1 , N 2 & N 3
2 ali 0 #
2 or 0 #
To je nujna posledica spremembe Direktive 74/408/EGS o sedežih, pritrdiščih in naslonih za glavo.
This is a necessary consequence of the amendment to Directive 74/408/EEC relating to motor vehicles with regard to the seats, their anchorages and head restraints systems.
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 76/115/EGS o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o pritrdiščih varnostnih pasov motornih vozil
The Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/115/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to anchorages for motor-vehicle safety belts
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Sklepa Sveta 2000/819/EC o večletnem programu za podjetja in podjetništvo, še posebej pa za majhna in srednje velika podjetja (MSP) (2001-2005)
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001-2005)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0781 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0781 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 157(3) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0242/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 157(3) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0242/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6‑0118/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0118/2005 ),
Člen 7, odstavek 1(Sklep 2000/819/EC)
Article 7, paragraph 1(Decision 2000/819/EC)
(1) V členu 7(1) se finančni referenčni znesek 450 milijonov evrov nadomesti s 531,5 milijonov evrov.
(1) In Article 7(1), the financial reference amount of EUR 450 million is replaced by EUR 531.5 million.
(1) V členu 7(1) se finančni referenčni znesek 450 milijonov evrov nadomesti s 538,5 milijonov evrov.
(1) In Article 7(1), the financial reference amount of EUR 450 million is replaced by EUR 538.5 million.
Proračun za prvotni večletni program je znašal 450 milijonov evrov za pet let, torej 90 milijonov evrov na leto.
The budget for the original multiannual programme was EUR 450 million over five years, i.e. EUR 90 million per year.
Proračun za leto 2004 (prvo finančno leto, prilagojeno širitvi) je znašal 91 milijonov evrov.
The budget for 2004 (the first financial year adjusted for enlargement) was EUR 91 million.
Ker je to izjemno pomemben in dobro utečen program na ključnem političnem področju, bi moral letni proračun za razširitev programa znašati najmanj toliko kot za leto 2004.
Given that this is an extremely important and smoothly operating programme in a key area of policy, the annual budget for the extension of the programme should be at least the equivalent of the appropriation for 2004.
Predlog Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Sklepa Sveta 2000/819/EC o večletnem programu za podjetja in podjetništvo, še posebej pa za majhna in srednje velika podjetja
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises
člena 251(2) in 157(3) ES
Articles 251(2) and 157(3) EC
Mnenje Ekonomsko-socialnega odbora
European Economic and Social Committee consulted
Datum predložitve – A5
Date tabled – A5
o skupnem stališču Sveta za sprejetje Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (13781/2/2004 – C6‑0008/2005 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (13781/2/2004 – C6‑0008/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča s prve obravnave
– having regard to its position at first reading
UL C 97 E, 22.4.2004, str.
OJ C 97 E, 22.4.2004, p.
230. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2002)0119 )
230. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2002)0119 )
OJ C 181 E, 30.7.02, str.
OJ C 181 E, 30.7.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2004)0317 )
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2004)0317 )
UL C .../Še neobjavljeno v UL. ,
OJ C ... / Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6‑0119/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0119/2005 ),
1a) Svobodni poklic izvaja nekdo, ki na osnovi posebnih poklicnih kvalifikacij zagotavlja osebno, odgovorno in poklicno neodvisno učinkovitost pri izvajanju intelektualnih in pojmovnih storitev za interes stranke ali javnosti.
(1a) "Liberal profession"signifies a profession practised by a person who, on the basis of specific professional qualifications, provides intellectual services personally, on his own responsibility and exercising technical independence, in the interest of the client and in the general interest.
Za njegovo izvajanje poklica običajno veljajo določene poklicnopravne omejitve v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo in pravom, ki ga v tem okviru samostojno določi posamezno predstavništvo poklica, ki zagotavlja in razvija profesionalnost in kakovost storitve ter zaupnost odnosov s stranko.
The practice of the profession is usually subject to specific professional constraints based on national legislation and on the statutory provisions laid down autonomously, within that framework, by the respective professional representative bodies; those provisions safeguard and develop professionalism, quality and the relationship of trust that exists with the client.
To opredelitev je v njenih bistvenih značilnostih potrdilo Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v svoji sodbi z dne 11. oktobra 2001 v zadevi C-267/99.
The main features of this definition were confirmed by the European Court of Justice in its judgment in Case 267/99 of 11 October 2001.
Opredelitev v sekundarnem pravu skrbi za dodatno pravno varnost, ne da bi škodovala nameri direktive.
The definition in secondary law ensures additional legal certainty without undermining the thrust of the Directive.
Istočasno se upošteva okoliščino, da sme temeljno pravico do svobode izbire poklica oblikovati ali omejiti le zakonodajalec.
At the same time, due account is taken of the fact that the basic right of freedom to choose one's profession may only be framed or limited by the legislator.
S tem se znebimo skrbi, da nižjestopenjsko pravo statutov poklicnih organizacij pridobi višji pomen brez nadzora zakonodajalca.
This removes the concern that lower-ranking statutes of professional organisations might acquire higher-ranking importance, not subject to scrutiny by the legislator.
(11) V primeru poklicev, ki so zajeti v splošnem sistemu priznavanja kvalifikacij, v nadaljnjem besedilu "splošni sistem", bi morale države članice še naprej določati minimalno raven potrebne kvalifikacije, da bi tako zagotovile kakovost storitev, ki se izvajajo na njihovem ozemlju.
(11) In the case of the professions covered by the general system for the recognition of qualifications, hereinafter referred to as "the general system", Member States should retain the right to lay down the minimum level of qualification required to ensure the quality of the services provided on their territory.
Vsekakor pa se v skladu s členi 10, 39 in 43 Pogodbe od državljana države članice ne sme zahtevati, da pridobi kvalifikacije, ki so običajno določene samo v obliki diplom, podeljenih v skladu z njihovim nacionalnim šolskim sistemom, medtem ko je zainteresirana oseba že dosegla takšne kvalifikacije, delno ali v celoti, v drugi državi članici.
However, pursuant to Articles 10, 39 and 43 of the Treaty, they should not require a national of a Member State to obtain qualifications, which they generally lay down only in terms of the diplomas awarded under their national educational system, where the person concerned has already obtained all or part of those qualifications in another Member State.
Zaradi tega je treba predvideti, da mora vsaka država članica gostiteljica, v kateri je poklic zakonit, upoštevati pridobljene kvalifikacije v drugi državi članici in preveriti ali le-te ustrezajo tem, ki jih sama zahteva.
As a result, it should be laid down that any host Member State in which a profession is regulated must take account of the qualifications obtained in another Member State and assess whether they correspond to those which it requires.
Splošni sistem za priznavanje ni v nasprotju s sistemom, po katerem država članica vsaki osebi, ki v njej opravlja poklic, predpiše posebne zahteve, ki so utemeljene na uporabi poklicnih pravil, upravičenih s splošnim interesom.
The general system for recognition, however, does not prevent a Member State from making any person pursuing a profession on its territory subject to specific requirements due to the application of professional rules justified by the general public interest.
To še zlasti zadeva pravila v zvezi z organizacijo poklica, poklicnimi standardi, vključno z izjemnimi kazenskimi pravili, predpisi za nadzor in odgovornost.
Rules of this kind relate, for example, to organisation of the profession, professional standards, including those concerning ethics, and supervision and liability.
Cilj direktive ni poseganje v upravičene interese držav članic za preprečevanje, da se nekateri njihovi državljani na neprimeren način izognejo uporabi nacionalnega prava na področju poklicev.
Lastly, this Directive is not intended to interfere with Member States’ legitimate interest in preventing any of their citizens from evading enforcement of the national law relating to professions.
Treba je pojasniti, katera pravila mora država članica gostiteljica še uvesti za izvajalca storitev, ki je v drugi državi članici.
It seems necessary to clarify what kind of additional rules a host Member State could invoke in relation to a service provider moving from one country to another.
V skladu s sodno oblastjo Sodišča (zlasti razsodba Van Binsbergen) pooblastilo države članice gostiteljice o uveljavitvi pravil v zvezi s poklicnimi kvalifikacijami ponudnika storitve dejansko presega disciplinska pravila.
By virtue of the case law of the Court of Justice (not least the Van Binsbergen judgment), the power of host Member States to make service providers comply with rules on professional qualifications covers more than disciplinary rules.
V spremenjeni uvodni izjavi je jasno razloženo, da gre za pravila v zvezi z organizacijo poklica, poklicnimi standardi, vključno z izjemnimi kazenskimi pravili, pravili za nadzor in odgovornost.
The recital, as amended above, explicitly states that the rules in question relate to organisation of the profession, professional standards, including those concerning ethics, and supervision and liability.
(11a) Ta direktiva ureja priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij, pridobljenih v drugi državi članici, s strani držav članic.
(11a) This Directive concerns the recognition by Member States of professional qualifications acquired in other Member States.
Ne velja pa za priznavanje sklepov priznavanja drugih držav članic s strani držav članic, ki se je izvedlo s sklicevanjem na to direktivo.
It does not, however, concern the recognition by Member States of recognition decisions adopted by other Member States pursuant to this Directive.
Oseba, katere poklicne kvalifikacije se priznajo na podlagi te direktive, se tako na to priznavanje ne more sklicevati, da bi v državi članici izvora uveljavljala pravice, ki ne izvirajo iz poklicnih kvalifikacij, ki jih je pridobila v tej državi članici.
Consequently, individuals holding professional qualifications which have been recognised pursuant to this Directive may not use such recognition to obtain in their Member State of origin rights different from those conferred by the professional qualification obtained in that Member State.
Pogodba prepoveduje kakršno koli diskriminacijo na podlagi bivališča na področju pravice ustanavljanja in svobode storitev.
The Treaty forbids any discrimination based on residence as regards the right of establishment and free provision of services.
Če je državljan v državi članici pridobil poklicne kvalifikacije in jih želi uporabljati kot podlago za opravljanje svojega poklica v drugi državi članici, kjer sicer prebiva, ampak ne izpolnjuje pogojev za opravljanje tega poklica, ki so predpisani na nacionalni ravni, se lahko sklicuje na to direktivo, dokler se s tem le ne izogne strogim nacionalnim predpisom.
If a national was awarded professional qualifications in a Member State and he wants to use them to pursue the profession in another Member State where he resides, but he does not hold the requirements required to pursue that profession at national level, he will be in a position to benefit from this Directive provided that the recognition does not mean a simple evasion of more restrictive national regulations.
(13) Različna poklicna združenja in organizacije ali države članice bi morali imeti možnost predlagati skupna izhodišča na evropski ravni , da bi spodbudili prost pretok strokovnjakov in ob tem zagotovili ustrezno raven kvalifikacij.
(13) In order to promote the free movement of professionals, while ensuring an adequate level of qualification, various professional associations and organisations or Member States should be able to propose common platforms at European level.
Ta direktiva bi morala te pobude upoštevati pod določenimi pogoji in v skladu s pristojnostjo držav članic, da določijo kvalifikacije, potrebne za opravljanje poklicev na njihovem ozemlju, vsebino in organizacijo svojih sistemov izobraževanja in poklicnega usposabljanja ter v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti zlasti na področju konkurence, hkrati pa spodbujati bolj avtomatično priznavanje v skladu s splošnim sistemom.
This Directive should take account, under certain conditions, in compliance with the competence of Member States to decide the qualifications required for the pursuit of professions in their territory as well as the contents and the organisation of their systems of education and professional training and in compliance with Community law, and in particular Community law on competition, of those initiatives, while promoting, in this context, a more automatic character of recognition under the general system.
Poklicna združenja, ki lahko predložijo skupna izhodišča, morajo biti zastopana na nacionalni in evropski ravni.
Professional associations which are in a position to submit common platforms should be representative at national and European level.
Skupno izhodišče je sklop meril, ki omogoča uskladitev vseh pomembnih razlik, ugotovljenih v zahtevah usposobljenosti v vsaj dveh tretjinah držav članic, vključno z vsemi državami članicami, ki regulirajo ta poklic.
A common platform is a set of criteria which make it possible to compensate for the widest range of substantial differences which have been identified between the training requirements in at least two thirds of the Member States including all the Member States which regulate that profession.
Ta merila bi lahko na primer zajemala zahteve, kot so dodatno izobraževanje, prilagoditveno obdobje pod nadzorom, preizkus poklicne usposobljenosti ali predpisana minimalna raven poklicnih izkušenj ali kombinacija teh.
These criteria could, for example, include requirements such as additional training, an adaptation period under supervised practice, an aptitude test, or a prescribed minimum level of professional practice, or combinations thereof.
(13) Morala bi biti dana možnost predlaganja skupnih izhodišč na evropski ravni različnih poklicnih združenj in organizacij ali držav članic, prav tako bi se moralo uvesti individualno poklicno izkaznico, ki bi pospešila izmenjavo podatkov med državo članico zaposlitve in državo članico nastanitve, da bi spodbudili prost pretok ter olajšali mobilnost strokovnjakov in ob tem zagotovili ustrezno raven kvalifikacij.
(13) In order to promote the free movement and facilitate the mobility of professionals, while ensuring an adequate level of qualification, it should be possible for common platforms comprising various professional associations and organisations or Member States to be proposed at European level , and an individual professional card should also be introduced, to speed up the exchange of information between the host Member State and the Member State of origin.
Ta poklicna izkaznica bi omogočala spremljanje poklicne poti strokovnjakov, ki se nastanijo v različnih državah članicah.
This professional card should make it possible to monitor the career of professionals who establish themselves in various Member States.
Vsebovala bi podatke o izobrazbi strokovnjaka (univerza ali dokončane izobraževalne ustanove, kvalifikacije) in o njegovih poklicnih izkušnjah ter zajemala sankcije zoper njega v zvezi s poklicem.
It should contain information on the professional’s training (university or institution attended, qualifications obtained), his professional experience, and any penalties received relating to his profession.
(17) Pri prizadevanjih za poenostavitev sistema, zlasti glede na širitev, je treba uporabiti načelo avtomatičnega priznavanja le za tiste zdravniške in zobozdravniške specializacije, ki so enake v vsaj dveh petinah držav članic .
(17) In an effort to simplify the system, particularly with a view to enlargement, the principle of automatic recognition should apply only to those medical and dental specialities which are common to at least two fifths of Member States.
Zdravniške in zobozdravniške specializacije, enake v zelo omejenem številu držav članic, je treba vključiti v splošni sistem priznavanja, ne da bi to vplivalo na pridobljene pravice.
Medical and dental specialities which are common to a very limited number of Member States should be incorporated into the general system for recognition without prejudice to the acquired rights.
V praksi je treba omejiti učinke te spremembe za migranta, če za te primere dopolnilni ukrepi ne veljajo.
In practice, the effects of this amendment should be limited for the migrant, in so far as these situations should not be subject to compensation measures.
Poleg tega ta direktiva ne sme vplivati na možnost držav članic, da uvedejo medsebojno avtomatično priznavanje nekaterih skupnih zdravniških in zobozdravniških specializacij v skladu z lastnimi pravili.
Moreover, this Directive should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to establish, amongst themselves , automatic recognition for certain medical and dental specialities common to them according to their own rules.
(17) Da bi upoštevali posebnosti izobraževalnega sistema zdravnikov in zobozdravnikov ter ustreznega pravnega reda Skupnosti na področju avtomatičnega priznavanja, je upravičeno, da se ohrani načelo avtomatičnega priznavanja zdravniške in zobozdravniške specializacije, ki sta enaki v vsaj dveh državah članicah.
(17) To allow for the characteristics of the qualification system for doctors and dentists and the related acquis communautaire in the area of mutual recognition, the principle of automatic recognition of medical and dental specialities common to at least two Member States should continue to apply to all specialities recognised on the date of adoption of this Directive.
Toda pri prizadevanjih za poenostavitev sistema je treba širitev avtomatičnega priznavanja novih zdravniških specializacij po datumu začetka veljavnosti te uredbe omejiti le na takšne specializacije, ki so enake v vsaj dveh petinah držav članic.
To simplify the system, however, automatic recognition should apply after the date of entry into force of this Directive only to those new medical specialities common to at least two fifths of Member States.
Poleg tega ta direktiva ne ovira držav članic, da uvedejo medsebojno avtomatično priznavanje nekaterih skupnih zdravniških in zobozdravniških specializacij , ki jih ta direktiva avtomatično ne priznava , v skladu z lastnimi pravili.
Moreover, this Directive does not prevent Member States from agreeing amongst themselves on automatic recognition for certain medical and dental specialities common to them but not automatically recognised within the meaning of this Directive, according to their own rules.
Predlog spremembe si najprej prizadeva za poenostavitev sistema: v razširjeni Evropi bo nadaljevanje starega sistema z upravnega vidika izredno težavno in bo komaj doseglo soglasje kvalificirane večine držav članic.
The purpose of this amendment is, in the first place, to simplify the system: to continue with the old system in an enlarged Europe would be extremely cumbersome in administrative terms and scarcely likely to secure the agreement of a qualified majority of Member States.
Iz tega sledi, da se bo razširitev avtomatičnega priznavanja novih zdravniških specializacij po datumu začetka veljavnosti te uredbe omejilo na tiste, ki so enake v vsaj dveh petinah držav članic, pri čemer je potrebno soglasje kvalificirane večine najmanj 13 držav članic.
That is why automatic recognition after the date of entry into force of the directive should apply only to those new medical specialities common to at least two fifths of the Member States (the agreement of 13 Member States at least is required for a qualified majority).
Vendar pa se zdi primerno, da je pri prizadevanjih za pravno varnost pri zadevnih poklicih in v prid prostega gibanja za 52 specializacij, za katere v obstoječi zakonodaji velja avtomatično priznavanje do datuma sprejetja te uredbe, avtomatično priznavanje zagotovljeno tudi v prihodnje.
However, to guarantee legal certainty for the professions concerned and help free movement, the 52 specialities covered by the existing right to automatic recognition on the date of adoption of the directive should continue to be recognised automatically in the future.
Uvodna izjava 27 a (novo)
Recital 27 a (new)