natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
21. poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj z Eurostatom sprejme odločitev glede uporabe novih količinskih in kakovostnih kazalcev kohezije v okviru vmesne ocene nove kohezijske politike leta 2009;
Calls on the Commission to deliberate on using new quantitative and qualitative indicators for cohesion together with Eurostat, in connection with the progress report on the new cohesion policy in 2009;
28. ocenjuje, da je treba izvesti nove študije, ki bodo prikazale različne scenarije o prihodnosti financiranja kohezijske politike EU; meni, da je treba izvesti primerjavo med glavnimi instrumenti financiranja (ESRR, ESS, prvi steber SKP, EKSRP) glede njihovega učinka na razvoj Evropske unije 27 članic;
Considers that there is a need for ongoing studies to develop various scenarios for the future funding of EU cohesion policy; believes that, in this connection, a comparison should be made between the effects of the various main funding instruments (ERDF, ESF, the first pillar of CAP, EAFRD) on the development of the Union of 27 Member States;
Evropski parlament in Svet sta julija 2006 sprejela štiri uredbe o kohezijski politiki za novo programsko obdobje 2007-2014, kmalu zatem pa so bile dokončno oblikovane tudi strateške smernice.
In July 2006 Parliament and the Council adopted the four regulations defining the cohesion policy for the new programming period from 2007 to 2014, and shortly afterward the strategic guidelines were also agreed.
Prav tako je bil določen pravni okvir.
The legal framework was already laid down.
Z določitvijo strateških smernic se je začel izvajalni del nove kohezijske politike.
Now that the strategic guidelines have been settled, the implementing phase of the new cohesion policy is starting up.
Čeprav se glavne smernice že izvajajo, je še vedno mogoče predlagati priporočila za spremembo izvajanja nove politike, da bi zagotovili najboljši možni učinek na socialnem, gospodarskem in ozemeljskem področju ter na področju upravljanja.
While the broad outlines are being implemented, it is still possible to make further recommendations to adjust the application of the new policy so as to maximise its impact in the areas of social, economic and regional policy and of governance.
Razen tega se trenutno ocenjuje učinke v okviru preteklega programskega obdobja.
We are also in the process of assessing the policy’s impact during the programming period that has now ended.
Komisija že oblikuje četrto kohezijsko poročilo, ki bo verjetno predstavljeno na ministrskem srečanju o urbanem razvoju in ozemeljski koheziji 24. in 25. maja v Leipzigu v Nemčiji.
The Commission is working on the fourth report on cohesion, which will probably be presented at the ministerial meeting on urban development and regional cohesion, to be held in Leipzig, Germany on 24 and 25 May.
Komisija bo jeseni 2007 začela razpravo o prihodnosti kohezijske politike, in sicer na podlagi zaključkov iz četrtega kohezijskega poročila.
In the autumn of 2007 the Commission will be launching a debate, based on the conclusions of the fourth report on cohesion, on the future of the cohesion policy.
Trenutno je še mogoče prispevati k oblikovanju poročila, ki bo predstavljajo podlago za obsežnejšo razpravo o kohezijski politiki.
It is at present possible to contribute to the wording of that report, which will form the basis of an extended debate on the cohesion policy.
Razprava bo namenjena tudi pregledu proračuna EU v letu 2008/2009, zaradi česar Komisija načrtuje predstavitev poročila o tem pregledu v začetku leta 2009.
The debate will lead to discussion on the EU budget review agreed for 2008/2009, for which the Commission plans to present a report early in 2009.
Glede na to, da bo kohezijska politika postala najpomembnejša proračunska postavka, jo je treba pozorno preučiti.
As the cohesion policy will become the European Union’s largest budget item it should be considered with care.
Pred začetkom razprave o pregledu proračuna bi bilo koristno preučiti in upoštevati dodatno vrednost kohezijske politike.
It would seem worthwhile to analyse and draw attention to the policy’s added value before embarking on the debate on the EU budget review.
Tako je namen poročila nuditi priporočila za izvajanje nove kohezijske politike, prispevati k razpravi o četrtem kohezijskem poročilu in utrditi ključno vlogo kohezijske politike pri uresničevanju ciljev lizbonske in kohezijske strategije.
The purpose of this report is accordingly to make recommendations for implementing the new cohesion policy, to contribute to the debate on the fourth report on cohesion and to highlight the cohesion policy’s crucial role in fulfilling the aims of the Lisbon Strategy and cohesion.
Doseganje največje možne sinergije med posameznimi javnimi politikami
I. Optimising the synergy between the various public policies
Učinek kohezijske politike je mogoče izboljšati s povečanjem sinergije med posameznimi javnimi politikami na vertikalni ravni, torej med nacionalnimi in regionalnimi politikami ter politikami Skupnosti, in na horizontalni ravni, torej med posameznimi politikami Skupnosti.
The impact of the cohesion policy could be improved by increasing the synergy between the various public policies, both vertically – between regional, national and Community policies – and horizontally – between the different Community policies.
Na vertikalni ravni bi morale države članice bolje poskrbeti za to, da njihove nacionalne politike spodbujajo posege, ki se jih financira iz strukturnih skladov, in izvajajo pomembne strategije (lizbonska, zaposlovalna itd.).
In vertical terms, the Member States should be giving greater attention to ensuring that their national policies encourage support measures financed by the structural funds and help to implement the major strategies (Lisbon, employment and so on).
Na horizontalni ravni bi morale biti politike bolj celostne in usklajene, še posebej na področju inovacij.
In horizontal terms, the policies should be more integrated and combinable, particularly in the field of innovation.
Predvideti bi bilo treba možnost kopičenja določenih pomoči in ukrepov, da bi lahko regije bolje usmerile svoja razvojna prizadevanja.
It should be possible to accumulate certain aids and measures to enable the regions to concentrate their development efforts.
Spodbujanje inovacij
Promoting innovation
Mala in srednje velika podjetja igrajo ključno vlogo pri uresničevanju cilja krepitve inovacij.
Small businesses have a key role in fulfilling the aim of increasing innovation.
V Evropski uniji, če jo na primer primerjamo z Združenimi državami, mala in srednje velika podjetja v raziskave, razvoj in inovacije ne vlagajo dovolj.
Compared with the United States, for instance, small businesses in the European Union do not invest enough in research, development and innovation.
So pa še zlasti mala in srednje velika podjetja tista, ki omogočajo zbliževanje manj razvitih regij.
Yet small businesses are particularly suited to promoting the convergence of less developed regions.
Zaradi tega bi bilo smiselno predlagati ukrepe za odpravljanje ovir pri inovacijah, kot na primer oblikovanje tehnološkega animatorja, in si zadati ambiciozne, vendar hkrati izvedljive količinske cilje.
It would therefore be appropriate to put forward some measures to overcome the obstacles to innovation, such as the person of the technology tsar, and to set out some ambitious, but realistic, quantified objectives.
Okrepitev ozemeljske razsežnosti kohezije
Strengthening cohesion’s territorial dimension
Cilj ozemeljske kohezije je medvladna konferenca vključila v ustavno pogodbo kot tretjo razsežnost kohezije.
The Intergovernmental Conference added the objective of territorial cohesion to the constitutional treaty as a third dimension of the cohesion policy.
Cilj je bil sprejet tudi na politični ravni, čeprav ustavna pogodba še ni bila ratificirana.
So the aim has been accepted politically even though the treaty has still not been ratified.
Ozemeljska kohezija je bila navedena v tretjem kohezijskem poročilu in v strateških smernicah, prav tako pa bo obravnavana v četrtem kohezijskem poročilu maja 2007.
Territorial cohesion was mentioned in the third report on cohesion and the strategic guidelines, and it will also be analysed in the fourth cohesion report in May 2007.
Kljub temu ostaja za uresničitev cilja še veliko dela.
However, much still needs doing to strengthen this objective.
S teritorialno agendo EU in leipziško listino, ki bosta sprejeti na ministrskem srečanju o urbanem razvoju in ozemeljski koheziji konec maja, bodo določeni cilji kohezijske politike, treba pa bo oblikovati še cilje za njihovo uresničitev.
The Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter, which will be adopted at the end of May at the ministerial meeting on urban development and territorial cohesion, will be laying down the aims of territorial cohesion, but will not be proposing actions to achieve those aims.
Ocenjevanje ozemeljskega učinka je lahko orodje za okrepitev koncepta.
The concept of territorial impact assessment could be a way of strengthening the concept.
Cilj ocenjevanja ozemeljskega učinka je povečati pozitiven učinek naložb na prostorski razvoj.
The aim of territorial impact assessment is to enhance the positive effects of investment on regional development.
Policentrizem bi moral biti vodilni motiv ozemeljske razsežnosti.
‘Polycentrism’ should be the leitmotiv of the territorial dimension.
Ob tem je prav tako treba zagotoviti ravnotežje med mesti in podeželjem in ter podpreti gospodarske dejavnosti, ki potekajo zunaj velikih mestnih središč.
In this context it is also important to be able to strike a balance between rural and urban areas and to support economic activities in areas that are remote from the major urban centres.
Natančnejše merjenje zbliževanja regij in učinka kohezijske politike
More precise measurement of regional convergence and the cohesion policy’s impact
Razprava o četrtem kohezijskem poročilu bi morala vključevati tudi razpravo o kohezijskih kazalcih in načinih za merjenje učinka kohezijske politike in drugih politik Skupnosti, povezanih s kohezijo.
Discussion on the fourth report on cohesion should also involve a debate on the indicators for cohesion and the methods of measuring not only the cohesion policy’s impact but also the impact of other Community policies on cohesion.
BDP kaže, kakšno je gospodarsko približevanje med regijami, vendar pa ne zadostuje za oceno socialnega in ozemeljskega približevanja.
While GDP does reveal the economic convergence of the regions, it cannot adequately measure social or territorial convergence.
Obstajajo namreč manj razvite regije, ki beležijo dobro gospodarsko rast, vendar pa njihova stopnja zaposlenosti pada, kar ima zaskrbljujoče posledice za njihov demografski razvoj.
There are less developed regions with a good rate of economic growth but a declining employment rate, and this is having a disturbing impact on the demographic development of those regions.
Izdelati je treba tudi druge kazalce za opredelitev regijskih potreb.
We need to use other indicators to define such regions’ needs.
Za doseganje največje možne sinergije med posameznimi javnimi politikami na horizontalni ravni je treba poglobiti znanje o njihovem učinku na kohezijo.
To optimise the synergies between the various public policies in horizontal terms we need to gain a better understanding of the impact of such policies on cohesion.
Treba je oblikovati neke vrste center za spremljanje učinkov politik Skupnosti, da bi Komisija in Evropski parlament lahko pridobila natančnejše podatke o rezultatih kohezijske politike, od katere bodo imele države članice in regije čim več koristi.
This requires a kind of observatory to monitor the impact of Community policies, to enable the Commission and Parliament to obtain more detailed information on the results of the cohesion policy, to improve its use by the Member States and regions.
Kohezijska politika ima nedvomno pozitiven učinek na upravljanje v Evropi.
There can be no doubt that the cohesion policy is having a positive impact on governance in Europe.
V skladu z načelom sodelovanja, ki vključuje civilno družbo in vse ravni uprave, so se preoblikovali upravni sistemi v številnih državah, ki so prejemnice strukturnih skladov.
The principle of cooperation, which includes civil society and all levels of government, has transformed the administrative system in many countries that are beneficiaries of the structural funds.
Za dvanajsterico držav EU, katerim nova kohezijska politika prinaša največ ugodnosti, je izvajanje kohezijske politike ogromen izziv.
For the EU-12, as the main beneficiaries of the new cohesion policy, its implementation is a major challenge.
EU podpira 12 novih držav članic v njihovih naporih za okrepitev svojih upravnih zmogljivosti.
The EU is supporting the 12 new Member States in their efforts to strengthen their administrative capacities.
Ta proces se mora nadaljevati tudi v izvajalnem delu.
That process should continue in the implementation phase.
EU bi prav tako morala poskrbeti za učinkovito uporabo strukturnih skladov.
The EU should also take care to ensure that the structural funds are spent effectively.
Strogo bi bilo treba kaznovati opuščanje projektov, ki jih je sofinancirala EU, in sicer bi bilo treba ukrepati proti oblastem, ki slabo ravnajo s sredstvi Skupnosti in projektov ne izpeljejo do konca.
Abandonment of projects already cofinanced by the EU should be rigorously penalised, with the aim of deterring authorities from wasting money by not seeing projects through to completion.
Kohezijska politika ni le preoblikovala upravnega sistema držav članic in njihovih regij, temveč je povečala tudi preglednost, ki jo imajo nad EU državljani, ter okrepila podporo EU regijam, ki jim kohezijska politika prinaša veliko ugodnosti.
The cohesion policy has not only transformed the administrative system of Member States and their regions, but also raised the EU’s visibility to citizens and underlined the increase in EU support to the regions, which it has benefited substantially.
Na žalost se ukrepov za večjo preglednost posegov vedno ne spoštuje in se jih ne izvaja pri manjših projektih.
Unfortunately the measures to increase the visibility of support schemes are not always respected and do not apply to small-scale projects.
Za povečanje pozitivnega učinka, ki jo ima kohezijska politika za podporo EU, je treba povečati preglednost vseh posegov.
To reinforce the positive impact of the cohesion policy on support for the EU, there is a need to raise the visibility of all support measures.
vpliv in posledice strukturnih politik na kohezijo Evropske unije
on the impact and consequences of structural policies on EU cohesion
Sprejeta besedila s tem datumom, P6_TA(2006)0221 . navedena med prednostnimi področji proračuna za leto 2007;
Texts Adopted of that date, P6_TA(2006)0221 . , Parliament lists cohesion as one of the priorities for the 2007 budget:
Vpliv in posledice strukturnih politik na kohezijo Evropske unije
The impact and consequences of structural policies on EU cohesion
Okrepljeno sodelovanje– datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Enhanced cooperation – date announced in plenary
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o napredku pri pogajanjih glede okvirnega sklepa o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji
containing a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council concerning the progress of the negotiations on the framework decision on action to combat racism and xenophobia
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA (B6‑0076/2007).............................................................................7
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION (B6-0076/2007)..................................................7
o predlogu priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o napredku pri pogajanjih glede okvirnega sklepa o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji
concerning the progress of the negotiations on the framework decision on action to combat racism and xenophobia
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga vlaga Martine Roure v imenu skupine PSE o napredku pri pogajanjih glede okvirnega sklepa o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji ( B6‑0076/2007 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council which has been tabled by Martine Roure on behalf of the PSE Group concerning the progress of the negotiations on the framework decision on action to combat racism and xenophobia ( B6‑0076/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega mnenja, ki ga je o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji predstavil 4. julija 2002
– having regard to its 4 July 2002 position on the combating of racism and xenophobia
– ob upoštevanju skupnega ukrepa 96/443/PNZ o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji,
– having regard to Joint Action 96/443/JHA concerning action to combat racism and xenophobia,
– ob upoštevanju okvirnega sklepa Sveta o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji Komisije ( KOM(2001)0664 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council framework decision on the combating of racism and xenophobia ( COM(2001)0664 )
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sveta iz leta 2005, imenovanega luksemburški kompromis
– having regard to the Council’s 2005 proposal entitled ‘Luxembourg Compromise’
Dokumenti 8994/1/05 REV 1 DROIPEN 24; 8994/1/05 REV ADD 1 DROIPEN 24. ,
Documents 8994/1/05 REV 1 DROIPEN 24; 8994/1/05 REV ADD 1 DROIPEN 24. ,
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sveta iz januarja 2007
– having regard to the Council’s January 2007 proposal
– ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah z dne 16. decembra 1966, zlasti člena 20(2),
– having regard to the 16 December 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and, in particular, Article 20(2) thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Mednarodne konvencije o odpravi vseh oblik rasne diskriminacije z dne 21. decembra 1965,
– having regard to the 21 December 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,
– ob upoštevanju dodatnega protokola h konvenciji o boju proti računalniškemu kriminalu z dne 28. januarja 2003 o kaznivosti dejanj rasističnega in ksenofobičnega značaja, zagrešenih preko računalniških sistemov
– having regard to the 28 January 2003 Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems
Niz pogodb Sveta Evrope, STCE št. 189. ,
Council of Europe Treaties Series, ETS No 189. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0151/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0151/2007 ),
A. ker so letna poročila Evropskega centra za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije (EUMC), njegova primerjalna poročila o rasističnih zločinih in obe nedavni poročili o antisemitizmu in islamofobiji pokazala, da so rasistična kazniva dejanja stalno prisotna v vseh državah članicah; ker se ocenjuje, da je bilo leta 2004 več kot 9 milijonov ljudi žrtev rasističnih zločinov,
A. whereas the annual reports issued by the EUMC (European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia), the EUMC’s comparative reports on racist crime and the two recent reports on anti-Semitism and islamophobia demonstrate that racist crime is a constant and persistent problem in all the Member States: it is estimated that over 9 million people were victims of a racist crime in 2004,
B. ker je bilo leto 2007 razglašeno za evropsko leto enakih možnosti za vse in je prav, da se v tem letu posebni poudarek nameni boju proti vsem oblikam diskriminacije,
B. whereas 2007 has been declared the European Year of Equal Opportunities for All and whereas particular emphasis should be placed in the course of that year on combating all forms of discrimination,
C. ker je treba ohraniti ravnovesje med spoštovanjem svobode izražanja ter bojem proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji,
C. whereas it is necessary to maintain a balance between respect for freedom of expression and the fight against racism and xenophobia,
D. ker je na tem področju zaželeno oblikovanje kriminalitetne politike, pri čemer pa je treba upoštevati dejstvo, da je v kulturi, ki temelji na pravicah in svoboščinah, kazensko pravo vedno zadnja možnost; ker meni tudi, da mora zakonodajna politika na tem področju upoštevati vse vrednote in zlasti navzkrižje med svobodo izražanja ter pravico vsakega človeka do enakega obravnavanja in spoštovanja,
D. whereas, although a criminal policy in this area is desirable but it must take into account the fact that within a culture based on rights and freedoms, criminal law is always the least and the last recourse; whereas, also, legislative policy in this area must be weighted in the light of all the values at stake and in particular in the light of the conflict between freedom of expression and the right of every human being to equal consideration and respect,
E. ker je treba svobodo izražanja in združevanja zaščititi, razen če se zlorablja za podpiranje uporabe sile, nasilja ali sovraštva, če je namenjena spodbujanju ali povečanju števila nezakonitih dejanj ali če bo najverjetneje povečala število teh dejanj,
E. whereas freedom of expression and association should be protected, unless it is exercised in order to advocate the use of force, violence or hatred, is intended to incite or give rise to unlawful acts and is likely to give rise to such acts,
F. ker kljub dejstvu, da imajo vse države članice zakonodajo na področju boja proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji, obstajajo med njimi pomembne razlike; ker ta razhajanja poudarjajo potrebo po usklajevanju na evropski ravni, da se tako zagotovijo učinkoviti ukrepi za boj proti čezmejnemu rasizmu in ksenofobiji po vsej Evropi,
F. whereas although all the Member States have legislation designed to combat racism and xenophobia, there are major differences between the laws applicable in the various Member States; whereas such diversity points to the need for a certain degree of harmonisation at European level in order to ensure that effective action can be taken against cross-border and Europe-wide racism and xenophobia,
G. ker se je treba proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji odločno boriti v vsej EU, v prvi vrsti z izobraževanjem ter stalnim navajanjem socialnih in političnih argumentov, ki bodo razkrinkali pravi obraz propagatorjev in jih osamili,
G. whereas racism and xenophobia must be vigorously combated throughout the European Union, primarily through education and through unrelenting social and political discourse exposing and isolating the arguments and advocates thereof,
H. ker kljub večletnim pogajanjem v Svetu še vedno ni prišlo do sporazuma glede predloga okvirnega sklepa,
H. whereas, despite a number of years of negotiation within the Council, no agreement on the proposal for a framework decision has yet been reached,
I. ker je nemško predsedstvo izrazilo namero o ponovnem pogajanju o okvirnem sklepu, ki zadeva boj proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji, kar je storilo po nizu posvetovanj, med katerimi je dobilo prepričljiva zagotovila o pripravljenosti vseh nacionalnih delegacij za sporazum, in ker je sprejetje tega okvirnega sklepa ena izmed prednostnih nalog nemškega predsedstva,
I. whereas the German Presidency has expressed its intention to resume negotiations on the framework decision on the combating of racism and xenophobia (following a series of consultations which have convinced it that all the Member-State delegations wish to reach an agreement), and whereas the adoption of the framework decision is one of its priorities,
J. ker je besedilo, o katerem se trenutno razpravlja, plod večletnih pogajanj in mora predstavljati izhodiščno točko za oblikovanje okrepljene evropske zakonodaje na tem področju,
J. whereas the text which is currently under discussion is the fruit of several years of negotiation and it must serve as the starting point for the introduction of more substantial EU legislation in the field,