natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zelena knjiga o prihodnosti evropske migracijske mreže (KOM(2005)606 končno) je bila objavljena novembra 2005, da poišče mnenja o morebitnem nadaljevanju tega pripravljalnega ukrepa.
A Green Paper on the future of the European Migration Network (COM (2005) 606 final) was published in November 2005 in order to seek views on the possible follow-up to this preparatory action.
Zneska 3,00 milijone EUR v OPO in 1,00 milijon EUR v PSP sta bila uvrščena v rezervo v proračunu 2006.
An amount of EUR 3.00 million in CA and of EUR 1.00 million in PA were entered in reserve in the budget 2006 .
Program izmenjave za sodne organe
Exchange programme for judicial authorities
Pripravljalni ukrep za žrtve terorizma
Preparatory action in favor of the victims of terrorist acts
Vrstica 07 03 03 02 v letu 2006
Line 07 03 03 02 in 2006
Pripravljalni ukrep Natura 2000
NATURA 2000 preparatory action
Pripravljalni ukrep — Javno zdravje
Preparatory action – Public Health
Vrstica 19 04 05 v letu 2006
Line 19 04 05 in 2006
Pripravljalni ukrep vzpostavljanja mreže za preprečevanje sporov
Preparatory action to establish a conflict prevention network
Vrstica 19 02 12 v letu 2006
Line 19 02 12 in 2006
Pripravljalni ukrepi za zmanjšanje količin jedrskega, biološkega in kemičnega orožja ter orožja malega kalibra
Preparatory action to reduce NBC weapons and small arms
Vrstica 22 02 07 v letu 2006
Line 22 02 07 in 2006
Vpliv širitve na obmejne regije EU
Impact of enlargement in EU border regions
Vrstica 22 02 09 v letu 2006
Line 22 02 09 in 2006
Zaključek pripravljalnega ukrepa za dejavnosti odstranjevanja min na Cipru
Completion of preparatory action on demining activities in Cyprus
Tabela 2: Zbirna tabela pripravljalnih ukrepov (nadaljevanje)
Table 2: Summary table on Preparatory actions (continued)
SKUPAJ pripravljalni ukrepi
TOTAL Preparatory Actions
Ta znesek vključuje pripravljalni ukrep 04 04 02 03 (0,5 milijona EUR), ki se je zaključil leta 2005.
This amount includes preparatory action 04 04 02 03 (EUR 0.50 million) concluded in 2005
Letna zgornja meja za pripravljalne ukrepe
Annual ceiling Preparatory Actions
Zgornja meja novega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, vključno s 0,5 milijona EUR za nove pripravljalne ukrepe.
Ceiling of the new IIA, including EUR 50 million for new preparatory actions
Vloga NVO pri izvajanju razvojne politike EU
The role of NGOs in implementing EU development policy
"Čeprav je svet razdrobljen in kljub hudim nacionalnim rivalstvom je nesporno dejstvo, da smo vedno bolj odvisni eden od drugega."
" However fragmented the world, however intense the national rivalries, it is an inexorable fact that we become more interdependent every day."
Delovni dokument je sestavljen iz treh delov.
This working document is in three parts.
Prvi oddelek daje podatke o vključitvi nevladnih organizacij (NVO) v izvajanje razvojne strategije EU, kot nadaljevanje preteklega dela, ki ga je v tem oziru opravljal Evropski parlament.
The first section provides data on the involvement of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in implementing EU development policy, in the context of earlier work conducted by the European Parliament in this regard.
Drugi oddelek kratko navaja povezavo med tem vprašanjem in proračunskim postopkom za leto 2007, še posebej pristop smotrne porabe sredstev in predstavitev zunanjih politik, ki je potekala 30. maja v Odboru za proračun in je vključevala tudi predstavitev Ashrafa Ghanija, rektorja Univerze v Kabulu in nekdanjega afganistanskega ministra za finance.
Section two briefly sets out the link between this issue and the 2007 budget procedure, in particular the value for money approach and the hearing on external policies that was held on 30 May in the committee on budgets and included a presentation by Ashraf Ghani, Chancellor of Kabul University and former Finance Minister of Afghanistan.
Tretji oddelek navaja možnosti nadaljnjega dela Evropskega parlamenta in Odbora za proračun ter analize na tem področju.
The third section sets out options for further work and analysis in this area by the European Parliament and committee on budgets.
Oddelek I - NVO in razvojna politika EU
Section I - NGOs and EU development policy
Evropska unija je skupaj z dvostransko razvojno pomočjo držav članic EU in denarjem, nakazanim s pomočjo Evropskega razvojnega sklada (ERS) največji izvajalec razvojne pomoči na svetu.
Taken together with bilateral development assistance by EU member states and monies paid through the European Development Fund (EDF), the European Union is the world's largest provider of development assistance.
NVO so vključene v uveljavljanje vseh teh kanalov razvojne pomoči EU.
NGOs are involved in the implementation of each of these channels of EU development assistance.
Delovni dokument se osredotoča na razvojno pomoč, ki se zagotavlja s pomočjo kanalov Evropske skupnosti, pri katerih ima Evropski parlament pooblastilo soodločanja ter je organ, ki podeljuje razrešnico in mora zato nadzirati izvajanje.
This working document focuses on development assistance provided through European Community channels, on which the European Parliament has co-decision powers and discharge authority and thus an obligation to scrutinise implementation.
NVO so obširno vključene v uveljavljanje zunanjih odnosov EU in razvojnih programov.
NGOs are extensively involved in the implementation of the EU's external relations and development programmes.
Ocena temelji na podatkih NVO, ki jih je dala Komisija leta 2004 ter na raziskavi stroškov in koristi razvoja v okviru proračunskega postopka za leto 2007. .
Estimation based on NGO data provided by the Commission in 2004, and the cost-benefit study on development in the framework of the 2007 budget procedure. .
Omeniti pa je treba, da je nekdanja Komisija enkrat določila okrog 1,6 milijard EUR.
It should be noted, however, that the previous Commission at one point put the figure at some € 1.6 billion.
Po več zahtevah Odbora za proračun za pojasnilo so se ti zneski zaokrožili navzdol, ker so vključevali razne "nedržavne udeležence", kot so univerze, cerkve, fundacije, sindikate itd.
Following various demands for clarifications by the Committee on Budgets, these figures were eventually adjusted downwards as they also included various other "non-state actors", such as universities, churches, foundations, trade unions etc.
V postopku iz leta 2004 je splošni poročevalec (Mulder, ALDE) zaključil z oceno zneska 1 milijarde EUR, namenjenega NVO.
In the 2004 procedure, the general rapporteur (Mr Mulder, ALDE) concluded an estimated figure of € 1 billion going to NGOs.
Znesek vključno z vsemi nedržavnimi udeleženci, tudi z upoštevanjem 'mednarodnih organizacij', kot so agencije ZN in Rdeči križ, bi moral presegati 2 milijardi EUR, lahko bi znašal celo do 2,5 milijarde EUR, tj. polovico celotne pomoči, izplačane iz razdelka 4 proračuna.
If all non-state actors are included, counting also "international organisations" such as the UN agencies and the Red Cross family, the relevant figure is likely to amount to over € 2 billion, possibly even up to € 2,5 billion, i.e. half of the total aid volume disbursed under heading 4 of the budget.
Delež financiranja NVO v proračunu, ki je namenjen zunanjim ukrepom, je bil relativno stabilen in visok ter za finančno perspektivo za obdobje 2000-2006 večji.
The share of NGO funding in the external actions budget seems to have been relatively stable, and relatively high, over the 2000-2006 financial perspective.
Glavna področja izdatkov NVO v razdelku 4 (preoblikovana nomenklatura predhodnega predloga proračuna za leto 2007) so:
The main areas of NGO spending under heading 4 are the following (nomenclature re-structured in PDB 2007):
· nedržavni udeleženci v razvoju (21 03), ki so bili prvotno razdeljeni v dve vrstici, namenjeni sofinanciranju NVO in decentraliziranemu sodelovanju (sprememba nomenklature v predhodnem predlogu proračuna za leto 2007);
· Non-State actors in development (21 03), which was formerly the two lines for NGO co-financing and decentralised cooperation (nomenclature change in 2007 PDB)
· pomoč v okviru tematskih programov/proračunske vrstice (kot so človekove pravice in demokracija);
· Interventions under thematic programmes/budget lines (such as human rights and democracy)
· pomoč v okviru geografskih programov;
· Interventions under geographical programmes
· pomoč v okviru ECHO (humanitarna pomoč)
· Interventions through ECHO (humanitarian aid)
Večina pomoči zadeva tematske ukrepe in sofinanciranje NVO, medtem ko je udeležba NVO v geografskih programih bolj omejena.
The bulk of interventions here lie with the thematic actions and NGO co-financing, whereas the NGO participation in the geographical programmes seems to be more limited.
Odbor za proračun je preučil razne proračunske vidike in vidike odgovornosti NVO v tem obdobju, in sicer:
The Budgets Committee has looked into various budgetary and accountability aspects of NGOs during this period.
· celotni delež financiranja NVO v razdelku 4;
· overall share of NGO funding in heading 4;
· elemente financiranja, ki sledijo običajnim pravilom javnih razpisov;
· elements of such funding that follow the normal rules of tendering;
· elemente financiranja, ki v finančni uredbi uporabljajo izjemo "neposredne dodelitve";
· elements of such funding that are given using the exception of "direct allocation" in the financial regulation;
· navedbe glede upravnih stroškov projektov NVO, ki jih financira Komisija;
· indications as to the administrative costs of NGO projects funded by the Commission;
· ukrepe Komisije za nadzor odgovornosti upravičencev iz NVO;
· Commission activities to monitor the accountability of NGO beneficiaries;
· celotno finančno strukturo NVO (delež financiranja iz vladnih ter iz nevladnih virov).
· overall funding structure of NGOs (share of funding from government and non-government sources respectively).
Zlasti v proračunih za leti 2004 in 2005 je to privedlo do ustvarjanja rezerv, ki so dobile široko podporo v Odboru za proračun.
In the budgets for 2004 and 2005 especially, this led to the creation of various reserves which received broad support in the committee on budgets.
Od Komisije se je zahtevalo, da odboru zagotovi obsežna dokazila.
The Commission was asked to provide extensive evidence to the committee.
Omeniti je treba, da je Komisija zahteve upoštevala ter pripravila obsežna poročila.
It should be noted that the Commission complied with the requests, producing quite extensive reports.
Navsezadnje so se rezerve povečale, v drugi obravnavi ali pa s prenosi v proračunskem letu.
Eventually, the reserves were lifted either in 2nd reading or through transfers during the budget year.
V proračunskem letu 2006 je bil oblikovan podoben postopek rezervam, tokrat s ciljem večje preglednosti sredstev, namenjenih mednarodnim organizacijam, predvsem sistemu ZN, Svetovni banki in Rdečemu križu.
In the Budget 2006 procedure similar reserves were created, this time with the objective of shedding more light on funding going to international organisations, most notably the UN system, the World Bank and the Red Cross family.
Komisija je ponovno pripravila natančne odgovore v novem poročilu, ki ga je novembra poslala EP, kar omogoča, da se rezerve povečajo v drugi obravnavi.
The Commission again provided quite detailed replies in the form of a new report sent to the EP in November, which allowed the reserves to be lifted in 2nd reading.
Odbor za proračun je tako dokaj temeljito preučil organizacijo in "sposobnost" financiranja NVO, ki ju je Komisija lahko predstavila.
The Budgets Committee has thus probed quite deeply into the organisation and "grip" on NGO-funding the Commission has been able to demonstrate.
Ob začetku tega procesa ni bilo na voljo ustreznih sistemov in postopkov za pripravo zbirnih zneskov.
When this process started, there were no adequate systems and procedures in place to produce aggregate figures.
V zadnjih letih se je to znatno izboljšalo, najmanj z vidika informiranja o proračunu in Komisija je bila sodelujoča.
In the last few years, there has been considerable improvement, at least from a budgetary information point of view, and the Commission has been cooperative.
Oddelek II - od boljšega informiranja o proračunu do smotrne porabe sredstev
Section II - from improved budgetary information to qualitative value for money
V resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta o letni strategiji politik Komisije so k proračunskemu postopku za leto 2007 določene tri ključne teme pristopa Evropskega parlamenta: določanje prednostnih nalog politik; smotrna poraba sredstev; priprava na srednjeročni pregled večletnega finančnega okvira (VFO) 2007–2013.
The three key themes of the European Parliament's approach to the 2007 budget procedure as set out in its resolution on the Commission's Annual Policy strategy are: setting policy priorities; qualitative value for money; and preparing for the 2008/ 2009 mid-term review of the 2007 - 2013 multi-annual financial framework (MFF).
Odbor za proračun je med svojim pregledom proračuna za leto 2007 uporabil vrsto inovativnih pristopov z namenom zagotavljanja smotrnejše porabe sredstev.
The committee on budgets has implemented a number of innovative approaches during its examination of the 2007 budget with a view to delivering improved qualitative value for money.
Pristopi so vključevali predstavitev politike; opravljanje raziskav stroškov in koristi področij politike EU, vključno z razvojno politiko; večjo povezavo med letnim proračunom in postopki podelitve razrešnice s pomočjo številnih predlaganih sprememb proračuna, ki so povezane s preučevanjem dokumentov, ki preučujejo izvajanje politik EU, kot so posebna poročila računskega sodišča.
These approaches included: policy hearings; the production of cost-benefit studies on a number of areas of EU policy, including development policy; and a reinforced linkage between the annual budget and discharge procedures through a number of budget amendments linked to a thorough examination of documents examining the implementation of EU policies, such as the special reports of the Court of Auditors.
Odbor je imel maja 2006 prestavitev politike o vprašanjih zunanje politike.
The Committee held a policy hearing in May 2006 on external policy issues.
Eden zaključkov predstavitve politike o zunanjih ukrepih v proračunu za leto 2007 je bil, da mora biti vloga NVO v skladu s ciljem "lastništva" programov zunanje pomoči držav prejemnic.
One of the political conclusions drawn from the hearing on external actions in the 2007 budget was that the role of NGOs must be compatible with the aim of "ownership" of external assistance programmes by the recipient countries.
Paziti je treba, da NVO (in sistem mednarodne pomoči nasploh) ne prevzamejo neposredno nalog, ki jih morajo izvajati države same.
Care should be taken that the NGOs (and the international aid system in general) should not directly take over tasks that should really be provided by states themselves.
Države morajo prevzeti odgovornost za svoj lastni razvoj, mednarodna pomoč pa mora okrepiti domače zmogljivosti za doseganje razvoja, kot pa da bi ga nadomestila.
There is a need for countries to take responsibility for their own development and international aid should support the strengthening of domestic capacities to achieve this rather than substituting them.
Pomembno je, da pomoč NVO ne zanemarja prizadevanj (ali je z njimi v nasprotju) nastajajočih demokratičnih držav.
It is important that NGO interventions do not neglect or contradict efforts made by emerging democratic states.
Ta vidik je še posebej poudaril Ashraf Ghani, ki je trdno zagovarjal, da mora biti država predvsem kanal, skozi katerega priteka razvojna pomoč, da spodbuja močne domače institucije.
This point was particularly emphasised by Ashraf Ghani, who argued strongly that the state must be the primary channel through which development assistance should flow in order to foster strong domestic institutions.
Dejal je, da so močne institucije potreben pogoj, da se razvojna pomoč prenese v trajnostni razvoj v ekonomskem, socialnem in demokratičnem smislu.
Strong institutions were, he said, a necessary condition for development assistance to be translated into durable progress in economic, social and democratic terms.
Naslednji nujen korak Parlamenta bi bila gradnja na preteklem delu Odbora za proračun na področju financiranja NVO in začetnih izidih predstavitev zunanjih politik z analizo, ki bi se osredotočila na smotrno uporabo sredstev EU na področju razvojne pomoči.
The next logical step for the Parliament would be to build on the earlier work on NGO financing in the committee on budgets and the initial output of the external policies hearing through analysis focussing on the qualitative value-for-money of EU funds in the area of development assistance.
Poročilo o analizi stroškov in koristi Economisti Associati o "oceni proračunskih sredstev in sredstev na področju razvoja in sodelovanja", ki je bilo opravljeno na zahtevo Odbora za proračun v okviru proračunskega postopka za leto 2007, je lahko prvi korak v tem procesu.
The cost-benefit analysis report by Economisti Associati on "assessment of budgetary resources and means in the area of development and co-operation" conducted on behalf of the committee on budgets in the context of the 2007 budget procedure could be seen as first step in this process.
· velika raznolikost med NVO (z dobrimi in slabimi rezultati) ter na številnih področjih nezadostno ocene za ustrezno presojo njihovo stroškovne učinkovitosti;
· high diversity between NGOs (good performers and bad performers) but insufficient evaluations in many areas to properly assess cost effectiveness;
· velike razlike v stroških pomoči med NVO, nekatere uspejo usmeriti h končnim koristnikom več kot 80 % sredstev, medtem ko druge le 30 %;
· high variance of support costs between NGOs, some managing to channel over 80% of funds to the final beneficiaries whereas others only manage 30%;
· ni smotrnih dokazov, da so NVO stroškovno učinkovitejše od vladnih institucij.
· no systematic evidence that NGOs are more cost-effective than government institutions.
Oddelek III - Možnosti nadaljnjega dela Odbora za proračun
Section III - options for further work in the committee on budgets
Poročevalec na podlagi omenjene analize preteklega dela na tem področju in analize, ki je bila opravljena v okviru proračunskega postopka za leto 2007, glede prihodnjega dela na tem področju predlaga tri zamisli.
Based on the above analysis of previous work in this area and analysis conducted in the context of the 2007 budget procedure, the rapporteur would like to propose three ideas as regards future work in this area.
Prvič, poročevalec meni, da bi moral z vidika uspeha predstavitev politik v maju in juniju 2006 (povzete so v poročevalčevem delovnem dokumentu 12) Odbor za proračun v letu 2007 predvideti podobne predstavitve.
Firstly, the rapporteur considers that in light of the success of the policy hearings held in May and June 2006 (summarised in the rapporteur's working document 12), the committee on budgets might consider holding further similar hearings during 2007.
V zvezi z vlogo NVO pri izvajanju razvojne pomoči je lahko to predmet predstavitve, ki se osredotoča na zunanje politike v začetku leta 2007 in s ciljem informiranja o pristopu Parlamenta k prednostnim nalogam zunanje politike v proračunu za leto 2008.
As regards, the role of NGOs in implementing development assistance, this might be the subject of a hearing focussed on external policies in the early part of 2007 and aiming to inform the Parliament's approach to priorities for external policies for the 2008 budget.
Po mnenju poročevalca mora vsaka taka predstavitev potekati v tesnem sodelovanju z ustreznimi specializiranimi odbori.
Any such hearings should, in the rapporteur's view, be conducted in close co-operation with the relevant specialised committees.
Drugič, poročevalec meni, da se lahko opravi nadaljnja analiza, ki bo podrobneje preučila vlogo NVO pri zagotavljanju smotrne porabe zunanje razvojne pomoči EU.
Secondly, the rapporteur considers that further analysis might be conducted looking more specifically at the role of NGOs in ensuring qualitative value for money in EU external development assistance.
To bi lahko opravili z uporabo proračuna za raziskave, h kateremu se zateka Odbor za proračun.
This might be done using the research budget to which the committee on budgets has recourse.
Z analizo se lahko opravi kakovostna primerjava učinkovitosti pomoči, ki se izvaja po posameznih kanalih.
Analysis might make a qualitative comparison of the effectiveness of aid implemented through a variety of channels.
Za utemeljene zaključke pa bi morala analiza temeljiti na podrobni raziskavi primera iz majhnega vzorca programov.
In order to come to well-grounded conclusions, such analysis would likely need to be based on detailed case-study work on a small selection of programmes.
Geografsko in sektorsko širino programov za analizo je treba skrbno izbrati in nadzirati zato, da se zagotovi ustrezno primerljivost rezultatov.
The geographical and sectoral breadth of the programmes to be analysed would probably have to be carefully selected and controlled in order to ensure a reasonable degree of comparability of results.
Tretjič, poročevalec predlaga, da Odbor za proračun premisli o razpoložljivih orodjih za to v letnem proračunskem postopku in postopku razrešnice, ki lahko omogoči smotrnejšo porabo sredstev z ozirom na udeležbo NVO v razvojni pomoči.
Thirdly, the rapporteur suggests that the committee on budgets might reflect on the tools available to it in the annual budgetary and discharge procedures that might enable it to ensure better qualitative value for money as regards NGO involvement in development assistance.
Po potrebi in če raziskave stroškov in koristi, poročila računskega sodišča in drugi viri dajo na voljo zanesljive informacije, se lahko ti uporabijo kot podlaga predlogov sprememb proračuna, katerega namen je, da se denar porabi najbolj učinkovito in uspešno v težkih razmerah, ki pogosto vladajo v revnih državah.
Where appropriate and reliable information is available from cost-benefit studies, reports of the court of auditors and other sources, this might be used as a basis for budgetary amendments that aim to ensure that money is being spent in the most effective and efficient way possible given the difficult conditions that often pertain in poorer countries.
3. meni, da je glede na število obstoječih izzivov uporaba sredstev v višini zgornje meje 110 milijonov EUR pod postavko 4 neizogibna;
Takes the view that recourse to the margin of EUR 110 million available under heading 4 is unavoidable, given the number of already identifiable challenges;
7. bo podprl občutno povečanje odhodkov za SZVP le v primeru celovitega spoštovanja določb medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju;
Will agree to a substantial increase of CFSP expenditure only if the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management are strictly complied with;
10. meni, da financiranje dejavnosti za zaščito in spodbujanje človekovih pravic v svetovnem merilu, ki poteka z Evropskim instrumentom za demokracijo in človekove pravice, ne sme iti v breme drugih ustreznih geografskih instrumentov za te politike.
Considers that activities to protect and promote human rights in the world should be financed under the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights without prejudice to the funds to be earmarked for those policies under the corresponding geographical instruments;
Predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007 - Oddelek III – Komisija
The draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007 - Section III - Commission