natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar, čeprav so za pomoč trgovini dodeljene znatne vsote, ne obstaja proračunska postavka za racionalizacijo teh izdatkov v okviru proračunske strukture.
And yet, although substantial quantities are allocated to TRA, there is not budget line/s to rationalise the budgetary shape of such expenditure.
Glede na rezultate najnovejših podatkov, ki jih je junija 2004 zbral AIDCO, je bilo v letu 2003 izvedenih 126 projektov, povezanih s trgovino.
According to the results of the most recent data-gathering exercise undertaken by AIDCO in June 2004, 126 trade related projects were committed in 2003.
Financiranje tovrstnih projektov prihaja iz najrazličnejših postavk, zato je resnično težko imeti pregled nad vsemi dejavnostmi in njihovim obsegom.
The financing for this kind of projects comes from a very large variety of lines and it is indeed difficult to get a clear picture of the activities and quantities involved.
Največ izdatkov je povezanih z regionalnimi programi ali postavkami, specifičnimi za državo.
Most of the expenditure is linked to regional programs or country-specific lines.
Vendar pa v nacionalnih strateških načrtih ni vedno lahko ugotoviti ukrepov, povezanih s trgovino.
In national strategy papers, however, specific trade-related actions are not always easy to identify.
Nadalje in navkljub dejstvu, da je ES največji ponudnik pomoči za trgovino, se sooča z omejitvami, ki jih povzročajo zapleteni postopki, medtem ko pomoč za trgovino včasih zahteva hiter odziv.
Furthermore, and despite the fact that the EC is the largest TRA provider, the EC is constrained by heavy procedures whereas TRA requires sometimes quick reaction.
Trenutni proračun prav tako ne omogoča financiranja splošnih programov in pobud v zvezi s pomočjo za trgovino, integracijo in prilagajanjem, ki jih izvajajo multilateralne organizacije.
The current budget is also ill-equipped for the financing of global programmes and initiatives on trade-related assistance, integration and adjustment carried out by multilateral organisations.
Do sedaj je ES imela težave pri zbiranju sredstev za t.i. celostni okvir ali sklad Doha, ker je proračun za razvojno sodelovanje natančno razčlenjen na geografske razdelke.
So far, the EC has had difficulty in mobilising funding for, i.e, the Integrated Framework or the Doha Trust Fund, given that the development co-operation budget is broken down into strict geographical allocations.
Zaključek lanskoletnega neodvisnega ocenjevanja pomoči za trgovino je: "Komisija mora razviti instrumente za posege na področju pomoči za trgovino, ki jih bo mogoče hitro uporabiti in prilagoditi spremenljivim razmeram."
Last year an independent evaluation of EC's TRA concluded that: "The Commission should develop instruments for TRA interventions that can be rapidly mobilised and adapted to changing situations."
Skratka, nova proračunska postavka je ključna za:
In short, the new budget line would be crucial in:
1) večjo preglednost in posledično večji demokratični nadzor proračuna na ključnem področju zunanjih dejavnosti ES in Odbora INTA;
1) Bringing more transparency, and thereby more democratic control, to the budget in a crucial area for the external activities of the EC and INTA Committee;
2) zagotavljanje pomoči za trgovino z večjo preglednostjo;
2) Providing aid for trade with more visibility;
3) večjo prilagodljivost pri zbiranju sredstev, ki poteka hitro in z ustreznimi multilateralnimi pobudami.
3) Facilitating due flexibility in mobilising funds quickly and through multilateral initiatives as appropriate;
Nova proračunska postavka bi sočasno državam v razvoju dala znak o resnosti namenov ES glede spodbujanja liberalizacije trgovine, ki pospešuje razvoj.
Such new budget line would also send the right message to developing countries about the seriousness of the EC's purpose in promoting a trade liberalization that works for development.
To je še zlasti pomembno v trenutnem kontekstu pogajanj o razvojni agendi iz Dohe.
This is particularly relevant in the current context of DDA negotiations.
Zakaj sedaj?
Why now?
Pogajanja v Dohi prehajajo v odločilno fazo.
The Doha Round faces a critical juncture.
Pomoč za trgovino je pomembna bolj kot kdajkoli prej.
TRA is more important than ever.
ES mora jasno pokazati, da namerava storiti več, kot pa le spodbujati liberalizacijo.
The EC needs to make clear that it is planning to do more than simple promotion of liberalization.
Nadalje smo priča vedno večjemu mednarodnemu zagonu in podpori za večjo in boljšo "pomoč za trgovino".
Furthermore, we witness increasing international momentum and support for more and better "aid for trade".
Naslednji dogodki so samo nekateri od zadnjih dogodkov v tej smeri:
The following are just a few of the recent developments in this direction:
1) Poročilo ZN o ciljih tisočletja zagovarja občutno povečanje finančnih sredstev, namenjenih pomoči za trgovino.
1) The UN Millennium Report has argued for significantly stepped-up funding for trade-related aid.
2) Predsednik Evropske komisije je obljubil dodatnih 300 milijonov evrov, ki se prištejejo 1 milijardi evrov letne podpore za povečanje obsega trgovanja držav v razvoju.
2) The President of the European Commission has pledged 300 more millions which add up to a total 1 billion Euro per year to support the trading capacity of developing countries .
3) Evropski komisar za trgovino Peter Mandelson je med svoja štiri načela postopne liberalizacije vključil "bolj učinkovito pomoč za trgovino".
3) EU Commissioner for Trade, Peter Mandelson, has included a "more effective aid for trade" among his four principles of progressive liberalization.
4) Komisija bi morala predlagati enoten tematski program za integracijo in prilagoditev trgovine, ki bi nudil podporo multilateralnemu sistemu trgovanja v okviru izvajajoče se reforme finančnih instrumentov zunanje pomoči.
4) The Commission should propose a single thematic programme for trade integration and adjustment, in support of the multilateral trading system within the framework of the ongoing reform of the financial instruments of external assistance.
Treba je poudariti, da namen te postavke ni sprememba obstoječih programskih in izvedbenih praks.
It is important to underline that this line does not aim at changing current programming and implementation practices.
Z večstranskimi pobudami bi bil uresničen majhen delež ukrepov, ki jih pokriva ta postavka.
A small proportion of the actions covered by this line would be implemented through multilateral initiatives.
Takšno zmanjševanje izdatkov ni upravičeno, zato bi bilo treba podatke predhodnega predloga proračuna popraviti tako, da bi odražali predhodno stanje.
Considers that the Council has made across-the-board cuts in administrative expenditure related to, among others, staff and management in DG Trade.
3. meni, da se trenutni proračun Evropskih skupnosti loteva vprašanja vedno večje pomembnosti pomoči za trgovino na neustrezen način in poudarja, da je v svoji trenutni obliki pomoč za trgovino komaj vidna, nepregledna in težko uresničljiva;
Considers that the current Budget of the European Union does not adequately address the growing importance of trade-related aid, and stresses that, in its current form, trade-related assistance is hardly visible, not transparent and difficult to mobilise;
(ii) pomočjo za razvoj trgovine;,
(ii) assistance for trade development,
(iii) pomočjo za prilagajanje trgovine;
(iii) assistance for Trade Adjustment,
5. meni, da je nova proračunska postavka "Pomoč za trgovino" nujna za: (i) izboljšanje preglednosti in posledično demokratičnega nadzora obsežnega proračuna (700 milijonov evrov letno); (ii) zagotavljanje pomoči za trgovino z večjo preglednostjo; (iii) večjo prilagodljivost pri zbiranju sredstev, ki poteka hitro in z ustreznimi večstranskimi pobudami.
Believes that the new "aid for trade" budget line is necessary in order to: (i) improve transparency and thereby democratic control over a large budget (i.e. EUR 700 million per annum); (ii) provide trade-related assistance with more visibility, and; (iii) facilitate more flexibility in mobilising funds quickly and through multilateral initiatives as appropriate.
V tem poročilu je cilj vašega pripravljavca osnutka zagotoviti, da proračun spoštuje pravila in sledi politiki, ki jo je sprejel Parlament na področju finančnega upravljanja in boja proti goljufijam.
In this report, the aim of your draftsman has been to ensure that the budget respects the rules and follows the policies adopted by Parliament in the field of financial management and the fight against fraud.
Spodaj obravnavane točke izhajajo iz pregleda porabe proračuna, iz sklepov o razrešnicah, ki jih je sprejel Parlament, poročil o upravljanju s proračunom s strani Evropskega računskega sodišča in sklepov Parlamenta o boju proti goljufijam.
The points raised below stem from an examination of the implementation of the budget, the discharge conclusions adopted by Parliament, reports on budgetary management by the European Court of Auditors, and Parliament conclusions on the fight against fraud.
V preteklosti so se dotacije dodeljevale v skladu s proračunskima postavkama 15040103 (subvencije za kulturne organizacije, ki spodbujajo evropsko idejo) in 15060103 (dotacije za organizacije, ki spodbujajo evropsko idejo).
Grants awarded under budget lines 15040103 (subsidy for cultural organisations advancing the idea of Europe) and 15060103 (grants to organisations advancing the idea of Europe) have in the past been earmarked.
Od leta 2006 naprej pa bo takšno dodeljevanje preprečevala Finančna uredba, medtem ko bo dostop do teh subvencij odločen na osnovi razpisa za predloge.
However from 2006 onwards earmarking is ruled out by the Financial Regulation, and access to these grants is instead decided on the basis of a call for proposals.
Prepozna objava razpisa za predloge bi tako lahko omejila število organizacij, primernih da se javijo na razpis.
Late publication of calls for proposals could restrict the range of eligible organisations able to apply.
Komisija mora zagotoviti, da je razpis za predloge skladen s predpisi, javen, pošten in pravočasen.
The Commission should ensure that the call for proposals is on track, open, fair and timely.
Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF)
European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)
OLAF je za leto 2006 zaprosil za 25 novih zaposlenih in za 10-odstotno zvišanje proračuna.
OLAF has asked for 25 new staff and an increase in its budget of 10% in 2006.
Böschevo poročilo o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti in boja proti goljufijam z dne 7. junija 2005 prinaša zamisel o vzpostavitvi OLAF-ovih podružnic, ki bi nadzorovale ključne tihotapske centre
The Bösch report of 7 June 2005 on the protection of the financial interests of the Communities and fight against fraud posits the idea of setting up OLAF branch offices to monitor key smuggling centres
P6_TA-2005-0218 , odstavek 38. .
P6_TA-2005-0218 , paragraph 38. .
Medtem ko naj bi bil OLAF upravičen prejemati zadostna sredstva za opravljanje svojega dela in hitrejše reševanje primerov, pa vaš pripravljavec osnutka meni, da je treba takšno povišanje zadovoljivo utemeljiti, še posebej glede na ugotovitve Računskega sodišča, da OLAF že razpolaga z zadostnimi sredstvi
While OLAF should receive sufficient resources to deal with its workload and resolve cases more quickly, your draftsman feels that a satisfactory justification for this increase is needed, particularly given the findings of the Court of Auditors that OLAF already has sufficient resources
Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št.1/2005 o delovanju Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam, odstavek 19. in glede na zagotovila, ki zadevajo nadzor in kontrolo dejavnosti Urada.
European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office, paragraph 19. , and assurances concerning the supervision and control of the Office's activities.
Odbor za nadzor proračuna poziva Odbor za proračun kot pristojni odbor, da v predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Budgetary Control calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. (a) ugodi zahtevi Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) po dodatnih sredstvih, če bo urad to zahtevo zadovoljivo utemeljil;
2. (a) Grants the request by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) for additional resources on the basis of a satisfactory justification;
(b) prosi za zagotovila v zvezi z nadzorom in kontrolo dejavnosti Urada.
(b) asks for assurances concerning the supervision and control of OLAF's activities.
Predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006 -Oddelek III - Komisija
Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006 - Section III Commission
Simon Busuttil, Szabolcs Fazakas, Ingeborg Gräßle, Umberto Guidoni, Bart Staes, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Alexander Stubb, Jeffrey Titford, Kyöstí Tapio Virrankoski, Terence Wynn
Simon Busuttil, Szabolcs Fazakas, Ingeborg Gräßle, Umberto Guidoni, Bart Staes, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Alexander Stubb, Jeffrey Titford, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Terence Wynn
Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve poziva Odbor za proračun, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. jasno zahteva povečanje sredstev, predvidenih za kritje izdatkov za osebje na področju politike konkurence, da bi tako zagotovili učinkovito nadzorovanje trgov Evropske unije;
Asks explicitly for the appropriations to be set aside for staff expenditure in the area of competition policy be increased in order to guarantee effective surveillance of markets in the European Union;
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za proračun, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. meni, da je kljub tem težavam pomembno znova potrditi zavezanost Unije k osnovnim ciljem lizbonske strategije za bolj socialno in konkurenčno Evropo ter obžaluje pomanjkanje ambicij Komisije v zvezi s tem;
Believes that despite these difficulties it is important to reaffirm the Union's commitment to the fundamental aims of the Lisbon strategy for a more social and competitive Europe and regrets the Commission's lack of ambition in this regard;
8. opozarja, da razvoj enotnega evropskega trga delovne sile ostaja jasen cilj in zato obžaluje dejstvo, da so odobrena posojila za EURES, zahtevana v predhodnem predlogu proračuna, skromna in predstavljajo znižanje glede na zneske, ki jih je lani zahteval in dosegel Parlament; meni, da ob upoštevanju dodatnih dejavnosti, povezanih z evropskim letom mobilnosti delavcev, financiranje ne more ostati nespremenjeno in zato pri dodelitvi proračunskih sredstev za EURES predlaga znatno povečanje;
Points out that the development of a single European labour market remains a clear objective and thus deplores the fact that the commitment credits requested in the preliminary draft budget for EURES are conservative and represent a decrease in relation to the amounts requested and obtained by the Parliament last year; considers that, taking into account the additional activities connected with the European Year of Workers' Mobility, funding cannot remain static and therefore suggests a significant increase in the budget allocation for EURES;
10. priznava, da predhodni predlog proračuna predlaga povečanje za proračunsko vrstico za spodbujanje socialnega dialoga v skladu s stališčem, ki ga je lani zastopal Parlament, in pričakuje poročilo o oceni teh finančnih instrumentov, ki bo objavljeno leta 2005;
Acknowledges that the preliminary draft budget proposes an increase for the social dialogue budget lines in line with the position taken by Parliament last year and is looking forward to the evaluation report on these financial instruments that will be published in 2005;
Predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006: - Oddelek III – Komisija
The draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006: - Section III - Commission
MNENJE ODBORA ZA OKOLJE, JAVNO ZDRAVJE IN VARNOST HRANE
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Odbor za proračun, naj kot pristojni odbor v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
5. poziva Komisijo, da dodeli ustrezno število osebja za izvajanje okoljskih programov in politik v novih in tudi v starih državah članicah;
U rges the Commission to dedicate adequate staff resources so that environmental programmes and policies can be implemented in both the old and the new Member States;
7. je prepričan, da je treba javno zdravje obravnavati kot bistveni del lizbonske agende, saj neposredno prispeva h gospodarskim rezultatom držav članic in konkurenčnosti EU kot celote; zato meni, da je bistvenega pomena dodeliti več sredstev za področje politike javnega zdravja;
Is convinced that public health should be considered as an essential part of the Lisbon agenda, as it contributes directly to the economic performance of Member States and the competitiveness of the EU as a whole; considers it therefore vital to allocate more resources to the public health policy area;
Splošne opombe
General comments
Predhodni predlog proračuna (PPP) za leto 2006, sprejet 27. aprila, je prvi predlog proračuna nove Komisije:
The Provisional Draft Budget (PDB) for 2006, adopted on 27 April is the first budget proposal from the new Commission:
· obveznosti znašajo 121,3 milijarde EUR (kar predstavlja 1,09 % BND EU in ustreza povečanju za 4 % v primerjavi z letom 2005),
· commitments amount to € 121,3 billion (representing 1.09% of EU GNI, an increase of 4% compared to 2005),
· plačila znašajo 112,6 milijarde EUR (kar predstavlja 1,02 % BND EU in ustreza povečanju za 6% v primerjavi z letom 2005),
· payments amount to €112,6 billion (1, 02% of EU GNI, an increase of 6% compared to 2005).
Predhodni predlog proračuna za leto 2006 je zadnji v okviru sedanje finančne perspektive, ki se zaključi konec prihodnjega leta.
The PDB for 2006 is the last budget under the present Financial Perspectives that expire at the end of that year.
Ker je proračun za leto 2006 prehoden, ima predlog dva cilja:
Since the 2006 budget is a transitional one, the proposal has got two objectives:
· zagotavljanje financiranja političnih in gospodarskih ukrepov v okviru sedanje finančne perspektive 2000–2006,
· to guarantee financing for political and economic actions within the present Financial Perspectives for 2000-2006,
· pripravljanje in nadaljnje razvijanje prednostnih nalog, določenih v strateških ciljih za naslednjih 7 let (2007–2013): blaginja, solidarnost, varnost, širitev in povečana vloga Unije.
· to prepare and develop the priorities defined in the strategic objectives for the next 7 years (2007-2013): prosperity, solidarity, security, enlargement and an enhanced role for the Union.
Ponovna oživitev lizbonske strategije z namenom pospeševanja gospodarske rasti in zaposlovanja
Reinvigorating the Lisbon strategy in order to foster economic growth and employment
Za financiranje lizbonske strategije je predvidenih okrog 40 milijard EUR [obveznosti 39,138 milijard EUR (+7,1 %), plačila 33,417 milijarde EUR (+8,9 %)].
Financing of the Lisbon strategy foresees some € 40 billion [Commitments € 39,138 billion (+7.1%), Payments € 33,417 billion (+8.9%)].
Kot je v svoji resoluciji z dne 6. julija 2005 navedel Parlament, "PPP Komisije nezadostno odraža dogovorjene politične ambicije, zlasti kar zadeva lizbonsko strategijo, in upoštevanje pomembnosti krepitve položaja malih in srednje velikih podjetij".
As the European Parliament stated it it's resolution of 6 July 2005, 'the Commission's PDB insufficiently reflects in budgetary terms the agreed political ambitions, especially as concerns the Lisbon strategy and taking into account the importance of strengthening the position of small an medium-sized enterprises' .
Evropski svet, Svet in Komisija so vedno znova pojasnjevali, da lizbonska strategija za zaposlovanje in rast predstavlja njihovo glavno prednostno nalogo.
The European Council, the Council and the Commission have constantly declared that the Lisbon strategy for employment and growth is their top priority.
Zato je nesprejemljivo, da tako Komisija kot Svet sedaj predlagata zmanjšanje sredstev za zadevno proračunsko vrstico v letu 2006.
It is therefore unacceptable that both the Commission and the Council now propose to cut the relevant budget lines for 2006.
V svoji resoluciji z dne 6. julija 2005 je Parlament predlagal tudi uporabo določb iz točke 33 (ki se nanaša na večletne programe) Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999.
In its resolution of 6 July 2005 Parliament also proposed to use the provisions of point 33 (concerning multiannual programmes) of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999.
To je glede na velik uspeh obstoječih večletnih programov, ki dobro delujejo, imajo pomemben vpliv in ustrezajo visokim zahtevam interesnih skupin, upravičeno.
This seems justified given the great success of the existing multiannual programmes which function well, have a remarkable impact and meet high demand from stakeholders.
Vendar je proračun, dodeljen za lizbonsko strategijo, preveč osredotočen na tradicionalne politike, kot so razvoj podeželja in strukturni ukrepi, čeprav bi se morali bolj osredotočiti na raziskave in inovacije.
However, the budget allocated for the Lisbon strategy is too focused on traditional policies like Rural Development and Structural Actions while we need to pay more attention to research and innovation.
Evropski parlament si mora bolj prizadevati za financiranje sektorjev kot so zdravstvo, energija, prevoz in informacijska in komunikacijska tehnologija, ker tu obstaja jasna evropska dodana vrednost.
The EP have to put more emphasis on financing sectors such as health, energy, transport and ICT where there is a clear European added value.
Glede teh sektorjev obstaja potreba po jasnem signalu za spremembo težnje k znižanju porabe za raziskave, ki je prisotna v sedanjih razpravah o finančni perspektivi.
There is a need to give a strong signal on these themes in order to reverse the tendency in the present discussions on the Financial Perspectives towards a cut in research spending.
Za podporo tej strategiji vaš pripravljavec mnenja predlaga, da se v okviru zgornje meje proračuna razpoložljiva sredstva uporabijo do skrajne meje (obveznosti 167 milijonov EUR za notranje politike, plačila 6700 milijonov EUR za celotni PPP), pri čemer se zaveda zelo omejenih sredstev, ki so dana na stran za obveznosti, ne pa za plačila.
To support this strategy, your draftsperson proposes to use, to the maximum, available funds within the budget ceiling (Commitments € 167 million for internal policies, Payments € 6700 million for the entire PDB), being aware of the very limited amounts set aside for commitments as opposed to payments.
V okviru proračunske pristojnosti Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko obstaja šest področij politike:
There are six policy areas within the budgetary remit of ITRE:
o Naslov 01 Gospodarske in finančne zadeve
o Title 01 Economic and Financial affairs
o Naslov 02 Podjetja
o Title 02 Enterprise
o Naslov 06 Energetika in promet
o Title 06 Transport and Energy
o Naslov 08 Raziskave
o Title 08 Research
o Naslov 09 Informacijska družba
o Title 09 Information society
o Naslov 10 Neposredne raziskave
o Title 10 Direct Research
Naslov 01 Gospodarske in finančne zadeve
Title 01 Economic and Financial affairs
Obveznosti = 56 milijonov EUR, plačila = 71,8 milijonov EUR
Commitments = € 56 million, Payments = € 71,8 million