natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evropski parlament je bil s pismom z dne 11. septembra 2006 zaprošen za mnenje glede schengenskega informacijskega sistema II (SIS II).
By letter of 11 September 2006, the European Parliament was consulted on two proposals on the Schengen Information System II (SIS II).
Prva zadeva se nanaša na predlog uredbe Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 2424/2001 o razvoju druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) in temelji na členu 66 Pogodbe o ES.
The first saisine concerns the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 on the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), which is based on Article 66 of the EC Treaty.
Druga zadeva pa se nanaša na predlog sklepa Sveta, ki spreminja Sklep 2001/886/PNZ o razvoju druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) in temelji na členih 30(1)(a) in (b), 31(1)(a) in (b) ter 34 (2)(c) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
The second saisine concerns the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2001/886/JHA on the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), based on Articles 30(1)(a) and (b), 31(1)(a) and (b) and 34(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union.
Cilj predlogov
Aim of the proposals
Cilj predlogov je podaljšanje mandata, ki ga je Svet podelil Komisiji in je namenjen razvijanju SIS II, izteče pa se 31. decembra 2006.
The aim of these proposals is to extend the mandate given by the Council to the Commission, which ends on 31 December 2006, with a view to developing the SIS II.
Komisija zato predlaga podaljšanje njegovega roka trajanja do decembra 2007.
The Commission thus proposes to extend the deadline until December 2007.
Poleg tega hoče Komisija zagotoviti potrebna sredstva za ta razvoj.
Furthermore the Commission wants to make sure that the budget necessary to its development can be provided.
Bodoči SIS II bo nadomestil sedanji schengenski informacijski sistem na pravni osnovi, ki je bila v Odboru za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve sprejeta 5. oktobra 2006, na plenarnem zasedanju pa 25. oktobra 2006.
The current Schengen Information System will be replaced by the future SIS II, the legal basis of which was approved in the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on 5 October 2006 and in plenary on 25 October 2006.
Tako imenovani „schengenski paket“ sestavljajo A6-0353/2006 , vzpostavitev, delovanje in uporaba SIS II (sklep); A-60354/2006, dostop služb držav članic, pristojnih za izdajo potrdil o registraciji vozil, do SIS II; ter A-6-0355/2006, vzpostavitev, delovanje in uporaba SIS II (uredba); ki so bili 25. oktobra 2006 sprejeti z veliko večino.
The so-called 'Schengen package' consists of A6-0353/2006 , establishment, operation and use of SIS II (decision), A6-0354/2006 , access to SIS II by the services responsible for issuing vehicle registration certificates, and A6-0355/2006 , establishment, operation and use of SIS II (regulation), which were adopted by a large majority on 25 October 2006.
Schengenski informacijski sistem
The Schengen Information System
SIS je baza podatkov velikega obsega, ki deluje kot skupni informacijski sistem in med pristojnimi organi držav članic omogoča sodelovanje in izmenjavo potrebnih podatkov, da bi se vzpostavilo območje brez nadzora na notranjih mejah.
The SIS is a large-scale database that works as a common information system allowing the competent authorities in the Member States to cooperate and exchange the necessary information in order to establish an area without internal border controls.
SIS tem organom omogoča pridobitev podatkov v zvezi z opozorili glede ljudi ali predmetov, ki so bila vnešena v sistem.
It allows these authorities to obtain information related to alerts on persons and objects entered in the system.
Pridobljeni podatki se uporabljajo zlasti za policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah, pa tudi na področju izvajanja nadzora nad osebami na zunanjih mejah ali na nacionalnem ozemlju ter za izdajo vizumov in dovoljenj za bivanje.
The information obtained is used, in particular, for police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, as well as in the field of controls on persons at external borders or on national territory and for the issuance of visas and residence permits.
Ugotovitve poročevalca
Observations by the Rapporteur
Uvedba novega SIS II si zasluži popolno podporo poročevalca, saj je zmogljivost obstoječega sistema omejena in ga lahko uporablja največ 18 držav članic.
The creation of the new SIS II merits the rapporteur's full support, because the current system only has the capacity to serve a maximum of 18 Member States.
Zato je postal nujen razvoj novega sistema, da se državam članicam omogoči celovito izvajanje schengenskega pravnega reda in s tem odpravljanje nadzora na svojih notranjih mejah z drugimi državami schengenskega območja.
Therefore it became indispensable to develop a new system to allow the new Member States to fully apply the Schengen acquis and thus to abolish controls at their internal borders with other Schengen States.
SIS II bo hkrati omogočil izboljšanje varnosti ter poskrbel za učinkovitejšo uporabo podatkov in vpeljal nove funkcionalnosti, pri čemer bo izkoriščal prednosti najnovejšega tehnološkega razvoja.
At the same time, the SIS II will make it possible to boost security, allow for a more efficient use of the data and introduce new functionalities, taking advantage of the latest technological developments.
Moral bi biti močno in prilagodljivo orodje, ki se lahko kosa s hitro spreminjajočimi se zahtevami.
It should be a robust and flexible tool, able to cope with rapidly changing requirements.
Leta 1998 je bila opravljena predhodna študija za oceno morebitnega razvoja in izboljšav SIS.
In 1998, a preliminary study was carried out to assess possible developments and improvements which might be made regarding the SIS.
Medtem je bila razvita nekoliko posodobljena različica SIS (SIS 1+) – ko so se schengenski ureditvi priključile nordijske države – ki je vključevala možnost, da se na obstoječi sistem priključijo še dve ali tri države.
Meanwhile a more up-to-date version of the SIS was developed (SIS 1+) when the Nordic countries joined Schengen, which included the possibility of linking two or three additional countries to the system.
Posodobitev je bila namenjena tudi izboljšanju zmogljivosti ter lažjemu upravljanju in vzdrževanju SIS.
The upgrade was also meant to improve the performance of the SIS and make it easier to manage and maintain.
6. decembra 2001 je Svet pooblastil Komisijo, da razvije SIS II, ki se – za razliko od sedanjega SIS – financira iz proračuna EU.
On 6 December 2001 the Council gave a mandate to the Commission to develop the SIS II which - contrary to the current SIS - will be funded by the EU budget.
Komisija je s tehnično izvedbo začela oktobra 2004, ko je podpisala pogodbo v višini 40 milijonov EUR za razvoj SIS II in VIS (vizumski informacijski sistem), ki delujeta na isti tehnični osnovi.
The Commission launched the technical implementation in October 2004 by signing a contract with a budget of up to 40 million EUR for the development of the SIS II and the VIS (Visa Information System), which shares the same technical platform.
Marec 2007 je bil določen kot ciljni datum za predajo SIS II.
The target date set for the delivery of the SIS II was March 2007.
Vzporedno s tehnično izvedbo so bile razprave o novih zahtevah SIS na dnevnem redu Sveta, ki je v letih 2003 in 2004 sprejel določeno število sklepov o funkcionalnosti SIS II.
In parallel to the technical implementation, discussions on new requirements of the SIS have been on the agenda of the Council, which adopted a number of conclusions on the functionalities of the SIS II in 2003 and 2004.
Evropski parlament je ravno tako prispeval k razpravi in svoje poglede izrazil ob koncu leta 2003.
The European Parliament contributed also to the debate and expressed its views at the end of 2003.
Glej poročilo Carlosa Coelha, A5-0436/2002 .
See the report by Mr Coelho, A5-0436/2002 .
SIS II je potreboval primeren pravni okvir, ki bi podrobno opisoval njegovo delovanje in uporabo.
The SIS II needed an appropriate legal framework describing in detail its operation and use.
Komisija je, glede na različna politična področja, ki jih je to zadevalo, 1. junija 2005 vložila tri zakonodajne predloge.
Given the different policy areas involved, the Commission tabled three legislative proposals on 1 June 2005.
Zaradi zasnove SIS, ki preči različne stebre, je prvi predlog temeljil na naslovu IV Pogodbe o ES (vizumi, azil, priseljevanje in druge politike v zvezi s prostim gibanjem oseb), drugi pa na naslovu VI Pogodbe o EU (policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah).
The first proposal was based on Title IV of the EC Treaty (visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to the free movement of persons) and the second one was based on Title VI of the EU Treaty (police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters) due to the cross-pillar nature of the SIS.
Tretji predlog, ki dopolnjuje ostala dva predloga in temelji na naslovu V (promet), je namenjen zagotavljanju dostopa do SIS II organom, pristojnim za izdajanje potrdil o registraciji vozil.
A third proposal, complementing the two other proposals, based on Title V (Transport), aims at providing the authorities responsible for issuing vehicle registration certificates access to the SIS II.
Navkljub obstoju treh zakonodajnih besedil, ki so uvrščena v različna postopka (soodločanje in posvetovanje), gre za enoten paket, saj SIS II deluje kot enoten informacijski sistem.
Despite having three legal texts following different procedures (codecision and consultation), they form an inseparable package as the SIS II operates as a single information system.
Poročevalec sicer obžaluje zamudo, s katero so bili ti predlogi poslani Evropskemu parlamentu, in dejstvo, da je manjkalo več elementov, t.j. obrazložitev predlogov, ki so bili zelo tehnično zahtevni in zapleteni, vseeno pa se je odločil, da paket obravnava kot celoto in pospeši pogajanja, da bi se kompromis o treh besedilih dosegel v prvem branju, ter tako ne deluje kot zaviralni dejavnik pri učinkoviti širitvi schengenskega območja.
Whilst regretting the delay with which these proposals were sent to the European Parliament and the fact that several elements were missing, i.e. an explanatory statement on the proposals, which were highly technical and complex, the rapporteur nevertheless decided to deal with this package as a whole and to speed up the negotiations with a view to reaching a compromise on the three texts in the first reading, so as not to act as a blocking factor for effectively enlarging the Schengen Area.
Ta kompromisni paket je bil 5. oktobra skoraj soglasno sprejet v Odboru za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve.
This compromise package was adopted almost unanimously in the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on 5 October.
Izid glasovanja je bil z veliko večino potrjen na plenarnem zasedanju 25. oktobra.
The vote was confirmed, with a large majority, at the plenary sitting of 25 October.
Četudi je bil Evropski parlament precej uspešen pri pospešitvi postopka za sprejetje pravnih instrumentov o SIS II, poročevalec obžaluje vse zamude, ki jih je doslej utrpel ta ambiciozen projekt:
Even though the European Parliament was quite successful in speeding up the procedure for the adoption of the legal instruments on SIS II, the rapporteur regrets the delays suffered by this ambitious project up to now:
– izvajalci, ki niso bili izbrani v razpisnih postopkih za oblikovanje novega sistema, so glede tega sprožili postopke pred sodiščem,
- Court cases brought by contractors who lost out in the call for tender proceedings to set up the new SIS,
– Komisija je imela tudi težave z izvajalci, ki jih je najela za oblikovanje te baze podatkov, njen zagon in upravljanje z njo,
- The Commission also had problems with the contractors it hired to create this database and get it up and running,
– junija 2006 so bile prvič napovedane zamude v časovnem načrtu projekta zaradi zamud pri pripravljalnih delih, povezanih z osrednjim objektom v Strasbourgu, kjer bo sedež baze podatkov.
- It was announced for the first time, in June 2006, that there would be delays to the project schedule owing to delays in preparatory work relating to the main site in Strasbourg, where the database is to be housed.
Komisija je priznala, da predlaganega sedeža v Strasbourgu ni mogoče pravočasno pripraviti, da bi lahko v skladu z časovnim načrtom tja dostavili opremo, potrebno za SIS II.
The Commission recognised that it was not possible to have the proposed site in Strasbourg ready in time to have the necessary SIS II equipment delivered in accordance with the schedule.
Glede na to, da je bil celotni manevrski prostor , ki ga je Komisija vključila v načrtovanje za primer zamude, že porabljen, preprosto ni bilo mogoče uresničiti cilja, po katerem bi SIS II deloval v marcu 2007.
Having no further room for more delays in the project given that the margins for delay built into the Commission's project planning have all been used up, the March 2007 target to have the SIS II operational simply cannot be met.
Napovedana je bila vsaj 15-tedenska zamuda pri namestitvi in začetku delovanja osrednjega sistema v Strasbourgu.
A delay of at least 15 weeks was announced for having the central system installed and operating in Strasbourg.
Posledično je bilo treba revidirati celotni časovni načrt projekta, ob čemer se je upoštevalo in poskušalo kar najbolj zmanjšati obseg posledic te zamude za odpravljanje notranjega nadzora meja z novimi državami članicami EU, ki izpolnjujejo zahtevane pogoje, da lahko postanejo del schengenskega območja.
Consequently, it was necessary to revise the global project schedule so as to take account of this delay and try to minimise the extent to which it will affect the lifting of internal border controls with the new EU Member States, which meet the conditions required in order to enter the Schengen Area.
Na osnovi tako imenovanega „dokumenta o celoviti časovni prerazporeditvi SIS II“ ( Global SIS II Rescheduling document ) se predvideva, da bi bilo lahko preizkušanje, potrebno za začetek delovanja SIS II, opravljeno v aprilu 2008, temu pa bi sledil sklep Sveta, ki določa datum, ko bo SIS II začel delovati v državah članicah, ki v celoti sodelujejo v SIS 1+.
On the basis of the so-called 'Global SIS II rescheduling document', it is envisaged that the tests necessary for the SIS II to come into operation could take place in April 2008, followed by the Council decision fixing the date on which the SIS II will become operational for Members fully participating in the SIS 1+.
Temu in posledičnemu prehodu na SIS II tistih držav članic, ki so trenutno priključene na SIS 1+, bo sledila vključitev novih držav članic, pri čemer se ocenjuje, da bo za tehnično povezovanje „novih“ uporabnikov SIS II potrebnih 12 tednov.
Following this and the consequent migration of the Member States currently connected to SIS 1+ to SIS II, the new Member States will be integrated, whereby the time period needed for the technical integration of the 'new' SIS II users has been estimated at 12 weeks.
Sklepi poročevalca
Rapporteur's conclusions
Poročevalec ne dvomi v to, da je treba zaradi vseh nastalih zamud, podaljšati mandat Komisije.
The rapporteur has no doubts regarding the need to prolong the Commission's mandate, owing to all the delays that have occurred.
Poleg tega pa z začudenjem poudarja, da prošnja za podaljšanje mandata do konca leta 2007 ni v skladu z zgoraj opisanim načrtovanjem, ki kaže, da tehnični razvoj SIS II ne bo dokončan v letu 2007.
He stresses with some surprise, however, that the request for the mandate to be prolonged until the end of 2007 is not consistent with the planning set out above, which indicates that the technical development of the SIS II will not be finalised in the course of 2007.
Podatki, ki krožijo v različnih državah članicah in so bili posredovani poročevalcu, kažejo na to, da bi bila zamuda lahko bistveno daljša, kot trenutno priznavata Komisija in Svet.
Information circulating in various Member States, which has been passed on to the rapporteur, suggests that the delay may well be longer than is currently acknowledged by the Commission and Council.
Po drugi strani bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi, da bi moralo podaljšanje trajanja mandata Komisije omogočati hkrati tudi razširitev njegovega dosega, da bi bilo mogoče vanj vključiti tudi priprave za tehnično povezovanje novih držav članic v SIS II.
On the other hand, it should also be taken into account that the extension of the Commission mandate should make it possible to expand its scope at the same time, so that preparations for the technical integration of the new Member States into the SIS II can be included.
Predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2424/2001 o razvoju druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 on the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
o predlogu Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o popravku Direktive 2002/2/ES o spremembi Direktive Sveta 79/373/EGS o trženju krmnih mešanic
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council correcting Directive 2002/2/EC amending Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs
PE 378.659v01-00
PE 378.659v02-00
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0340 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0340 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 152(4)(b) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0209/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 152(4)(b) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0209/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6‑0411/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0411/2006 ),
UVODNA IZJAVA 1 a (novo)
RECITAL 1 a (new)
(1a) Zastavljeni cilji za varnost krme se trenutno uresničujejo z uporabo določb Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 in Uredbe (ES) 183/2005;
(1a) The objective of ensuring feed safety is currently being achieved through implementation of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 183/2005.
Zaradi popolne spremembe zakonodaje o varnosti krme od leta 2002 – zlasti s sprejetjem in izvajanjem Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 (splošna živilska zakonodaja) in Uredbe (ES) št. 183/2005 o higieni krme, ki je še ni bilo ob sprejetju Direktive 2002/2/ES – prvotno zastavljeni cilji v členu 1(4) Direktive 2002/2/ES glede varnosti krme niso več ustrezni.
In the light of the overhaul of feed safety legislation that has been carried out since 2002 - in particular with the adoption and implementation of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 (general food law provisions) and Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 on feed hygiene, which did not exist at the time of the adoption of Directive 2002/2/EC - the original objective of Article 1(4) of Directive 2002/2/EC, namely to ensure feed safety, is longer relevant.
Glede na poročilo CIVIC za leto 2005 večina držav članic meni, da označevanje odstotkov ne prinaša nobenih koristi za varnost krme.
According to the 2005 CIVIC report, the majority of the Member States do not regard the percentage declaration as benefiting feed safety.
UVODNA IZJAVA 1 b (novo)
RECITAL 1 b (new)
(1b) V državah članicah je pri več odločitvah sodišč prišlo do različne in neenake uporabe Direktive 2002/2/ES, nekateri z njo povezani postopki na nacionalnih sodiščih pa še zdaj niso zaključeni.
(1b) A number of court rulings in the Member States have led to Directive 2002/2/EC being implemented differently and unevenly and various cases relating to it are currently pending before those courts.
Uporaba Direktive 2002/2/ES ni enotna na ravni držav članic, ker so sodišča v nekaterih državah članicah odložila izvajanje nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov direktive, v drugih pa ne.
Directive 2002/2/EC is not being implemented in a uniform way at Member State level, given that national implementing measures have been suspended by the courts in some Member States, and not in others.
To vodi do razlikovanja pri uporabi določb Direktive, zlasti tistih o označevanju odstotkov za posamična krmila v krmi.
That is leading to discrimination as regards the implementation of the provisions of the directive and in particular those relating to the percentage declaration for feed materials.
UVODNA IZJAVA 3 a (novo)
RECITAL 3 a (new)
(3a) Svet in Evropski parlament sedaj ne nameravata sprejeti nadaljnjih sprememb osnovnega pravnega akta, saj je Komisija v okviru programa za poenostavitev pristala, da bo do srede leta 2007 pripravila predloge za obsežno spremembo zakonodaje o krmi in živilih.
(3a) The Council and the European Parliament are not at present making more far ‑reaching amendments to the basic legal act, as the Commission has promised, as part of the simplification programme, to draw up proposals by mid-2007 to overhaul food and feed legislation.
Pričakujeta, da bo v tem okviru na novo celostno obravnavano tudi vprašanje tako imenovanega "odprtega označevanja sestavin" in glede tega pričakujeta nove predloge Komisije, ki bodo upoštevali tako interese kmetov za natančne in podrobne podatke o sestavi krme kot interese industrije za zadostno zaščito poslovnih skrivnosti.
They anticipate that the issue of the so-called 'open declaration' of ingredients will be fully reviewed in this connection, and expect new proposals from the Commission taking account both of the interest of farmers in being provided with precise, detailed information on the feed materials contained in feedingstuffs and the interest of the industry in ensuring that business secrets are adequately protected.
Parlament naj sedaj ne predlaga posameznih sprememb osnovnih pravnih aktov, saj je Komisija tudi sicer za sredo leta 2007 napovedala obsežne predloge za reformo zakonodaje o živilih in krmi.
Parliament should not at present propose individual amendments to the basic legal acts, as the Commission has in any case announced that comprehensive proposals for reform of food and feed law are to be drawn up by mid ‑2007.
Tem predlogom je treba dodati obsežno presojo vplivov, hkrati pa morajo še bolj uskladiti predpise v zakonodaji o živilih in krmi.
The proposals are to be accompanied by a full impact assessment and will harmonise food and feed law provisions more closely.
Posamezne spremembe, ki presegajo preprosto izvajanje sodbe Sodišča, bi ta proces samo ovirale.
Individual amendments that go beyond simply complying with the judgment of the Court will only hamper that work.
Člen 1, odstavek 1, točka (b) (Direktiva 2002/2/ES)
Article 1, paragraph 1, point (b) (Directive 2002/2/EC)
(1) Člen 1(1)(b) se črta.
(1) Article 1(1)(b) is deleted.
(1) Člen 1(1)(b) se nadomesti z:
(1) Article 1(1)(b) is replaced by:
„b) doda se naslednja točka:
"b) The following point shall be added:
‚l) pri krmnih mešanicah, ki niso namenjene hišnim živalim, napotek: "v primeru nesreče lahko pristojni organi natančne podatke o masnih deležih posamičnih krmil, vsebovanih v tej krmi, pridobijo pri: …" (ime ali naziv družbe, naslov ali sedež družbe, telefonska številka in elektronski naslov osebe, odgovorne za podatke iz tega odstavka).
‘l) in the case of compound feedingstuffs other than those intended for pets, the indication “the exact percentages by weight of feed materials used in this feedingstuff may be obtained by the competent authorities in case of calamities from: …” (name or trade name, address or registered office, telephone number and e-mail address of the person responsible for the particulars referred to in this paragraph).
Ti podatki se v primeru nesreče predložijo na zahtevo pristojnih organov. ¢ “
This information shall be provided at the competent authorities' request in case of calamities.' "