natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3) V primeru upravičenega dvoma lahko država članica gostiteljica od pristojnih organov druge države članice zahteva, da priskrbijo pisno potrdilo o verodostojnosti potrdil pomorščakov, določenih zaznamkov ali drugih izdanih dokumentarnih dokazil o usposabljanju v tej drugi državi članici.
3) In the event of justified doubts, the host Member State may require of the competent authorities of another Member State to furnish written confirmation of the authenticity of seafarers’ certificates, corresponding endorsements or any other documentary evidence of training issued in that other Member State.
3) Na zahtevo države članice gostiteljice morajo pristojni organi druge države članice priskrbeti pisno potrdilo o verodostojnosti ali zavrnitvi potrdil pomorščakov, določenih zaznamkov ali drugih izdanih dokumentarnih dokazil o usposabljanju v tej drugi državi članici.
3) At the request of a host Member State , the competent authorities of another Member State must furnish written confirmation or denial of the authenticity of seafarers’ certificates, corresponding endorsements or any other documentary evidence of training issued in that other Member State.
Obstoječe besedilo je preveč splošno.
The existing wording is too loose.
Direktiva mora od držav članic zahtevati, da posredujejo zahtevane informacije.
The directive must require Member States to supply the requested information.
Člen 8 a (novo)
Article 8 a (new)
Člen 8a
Article 8a
Poročilo o usklajenosti
Compliance report
Najpozneje [5 let od začetka veljavnosti te Direktive] mora Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti poročilo o oceni, ki se pripravi na osnovi informacij pridobljenih v skladu s členom 6.
No later than [5 years from the date of entry into force of this Directive] the Commission must submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation report drawn up on the basis of the information obtained pursuant to Article 6.
V tem poročilu bo Komisija preučila usklajenost držav članic s to Direktivo in, kjer bo potrebno, bo predlagala dodatne ukrepe.
In this report the Commission will analyse the Member States' compliance with this Directive and, where necessary, make proposals for additional measures.
Komisija bo po petih letih predložila poročilo o oceni ter tako Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu omogočila, da ocenita, če so države članice izpolnile svoje obveznosti in če obstaja potreba po dodatnih ukrepih
By submitting an evaluation report after 5 years, the Commission will enable the European Parliament and the Council to judge whether the Member States have met their obligations and whether there is a need for additional measures.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o priznavanju potrdil pomorščakov, izdanih s strani držav članic in spremembi Direktive 2001/25/ES
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of seafarers’ certificates issued by the Member States and amending Directive 2001/25/EC
člena 251(2) in 80(2) ES
Articles 251(2) and 80(2) EC
Odbori, vprašani za mnenje Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
o predlogu direktive Sveta, ki spreminja Direktivo 77/388/ES zaradi pristopa Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške
on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 77/388/EC by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia
Poročevalec: Ian Stewart Hudghton
Rapporteur: Ian Stewart Hudghton
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu (8754/2004 - KOM(2004)0295 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (8754/2004 - COM(2004)0295 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 93 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0074/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 93 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0074/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6‑0058/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0058/2004 ),
A. potrjujoč svojo podporo poskusnemu načrtu nižjih stopenj davka na dodano vrednost za delovno intenzivne dejavnosti, kot je izrazil v svojih stališčih z dne 20. novembra 2002
A. reaffirming its support for the experimental scheme of reduced rates of value added tax for labour-intensive services, as expressed in its positions of 20 November 2002
2 UL C 25 E, 29.1.2004, str.
OJ C 25 E, 29.1.2004, p.
3 UL C 89 E, 14.4.2004, str.
OJ C 89 E, 14.4.2004, p.
138 3 in 15. januarja 2004
138. and of 15 January 2004
4 UL C 92 E, 16.4.2004, str.
OJ C 92 E, 16.4.2004, p.
Namen tega predloga je preučiti - upajmo, da koristen - učinek manjšega obdavčenja na ohranitev obstoječih in odpiranje novih delovnih mest v specifičnih, delovno intenzivnih sektorjih storitvene industrije.
Its objective is to study the - hopefully beneficial - effect of reduced taxation on job preservation and creation in specific, labour-intensive sectors of the service industry.
Omeniti je treba, da naj bi se ta poskus prvotno končal 31. decembra 2002, potem pa je bil podaljšan do 31. decembra 2003.
It should be recalled that this experiment was originally due to expire by 31 December 2002, and was then extended until 31 December 2003.
Nekoliko nepričakovano podaljšanje veljavnosti sistema do 31. decembra 2005 (spet z odločno podporo EP, sledeč priporočilom tega odbora) je te okoliščine popolnoma spremenilo.
The scheme's somewhat unexpected extension until 31 December 2005 (again strongly supported by Parliament, following the recommendations of this committee) completely changed these circumstances.
Vse države članice so bile zdaj vključene v ustrezna posvetovanja, Poljska in Češka pa sta izjavili, da nameravata uporabiti nižje davčne stopnje, in to od 1. maja 2004 tudi dejansko izvajata:
All accession states were now duly consulted, and Poland and the Czech Republic announced their intention to apply the reduced rates, and have indeed done so since 1 May 2004:
Poljska je stopnjo DDV za majhne servisne delavnice za kolesa, čevlje itd. znižala na 7% (namesto 22%), Češka pa se je odločila, da bo sistem uporabila v sektorju čistilnih storitev in na področju skrbi za dom, kjer znaša davčna stopnja 5% namesto 19%.
Poland applies a VAT rate of 7% (as opposed to 22%) to small repair shops for bicycles, shoes etc., while the Czech Republic chose to apply the scheme to the cleaning and domestic care sectors, which are taxed at 5% instead of 19%.
Pričujoči predlog direktive je zato namenjen oblikovanju nujno potrebne – celo retroaktivne – pravne osnove za obstoječo prakso v teh dveh državah, ki bo skladna s pravno osnovo devetih "starih" držav članic, ki bodo ta sistem uporabljale do njegovega preteka leta 2005.
The present Proposal for a Directive is therefore intended to provide an urgently needed -indeed, retroactive - legal base for current practice in these two countries, which is in line with that of nine of the "old" Member States currently applying the scheme until its expiry in 2005.
Prvotni predlog Komisije je temeljil na klavzuli o prilagoditvah (člen 57) Akta o pristopu, ki Svetu dovoljuje glasovanje s kvalificirano večino brez posvetovanja z EP, vendar se je Svet odločil pravno podlago prenesti na člen 93 Pogodbe, tako da je sedaj potrebno posvetovanje z EP - pa tudi soglasje v Svetu.
While the original Commission proposal was based on the "tidying-up" clause (Art. 57) of the Act of Accession, allowing adoption by qualified majority in Council without consultation of Parliament, the Council chose to change the legal base to Article 93 of the Treaty, so the consultation of Parliament is now required - as is unanimity in Council.
Očitno mnenja v Svetu ostajajo deljena, bolj ali manj v smislu splošnega mnenja o znižanju stopnje DDV, saj tiste države članice, ki jih ta poskus že na začetku ni prepričal, nasprotujejo vsakršnemu širjenju le-tega.
It would appear that opinion in Council remains divided more or less along the lines of overall approach to the reduced VAT issue, with those Member States that were unconvinced by the experiment in the first place opposing any extension of it.
Vendar pa ta predlog še zdaleč noče uvajati novih določb, temveč zgolj odpreti obstoječi sistem dvema novima državama članicama, katerih delež BDP bo le malenkostno spremenil statistične podatke tega poskusa.
However, far from introducing any new provisions, the proposal under consideration merely opens an existing scheme to two new Member States, whose share of GDP will hardly skew the statistical data of this experiment.
To vprašanje bi bilo zatorej treba obravnavati kot preprosto vprašanje enakovrednega obravnavanja novodošlih držav članic, ne pa v smislu načel davčne politike.
The issue should thus be considered, not as a question of tax policy principle, but as a simple matter of equal treatment for the newly joined Member States.
Poročevalec zategadelj priporoča čimprejšnje sprejetje zakonodajnega predloga.
Your rapporteur therefore recommends approving the legislative proposal without delay.
Predlog direktive Sveta, ki spreminja Direktivo 77/388/ES zaradi pristopa Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške
Proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 77/388/EC by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia
člen 93
Article 93
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu in političnem usklajevanju in sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni in Združenimi mehiškimi državami na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu in političnem usklajevanju in sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni in Združenimi mehiškimi državami na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
(Postopek privolitve)
(Assent procedure)
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2004)0270 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0270 )
UL C ... / Še neobjavljeno v UL. ,
OJ C ... / Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju prošnje Sveta za privolitev v skladu s členom 300(3), drugim pododstavkom, v povezavi s členi 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5), 181 in 300(2), prvim pododstavkom, prvim in drugim stavkom Pogodbe ES ( C6-0019/2004 ),
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Articles 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5), 181 and 300(2), first subparagraph, first and second sentence of the EC Treaty ( C6‑0019/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 75, 83(7) in 43(1) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6-0060/2004 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0060/2004 ),
Predlog sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu in političnem usklajevanju in sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni in Združenimi mehiškimi državami na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
člen 300(3), drugi pododstavek, členi 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5), 181 in 300(2), prvi pododstavek, prvi in drugi stavek Pogodbe ES
Articles 300(3), second subparagraph, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5), 181 and 300(2), first subparagraph, first and second sentence of the EC Treaty
člena 75 in 83(7)
Rules 75 and 83(7)
Datum prošnje za privolitev Parlamenta
Date of request for Parliament’s assent
člen 43(1) 31.8.2004
Rule 43(1) 31.8.2004
Enrique Barón Crespo, Daniel Caspary, Giulietto Chiesa, Christofer Fjellner, Béla Glattfelder, Sajjad Karim, Alain Lipietz, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Georgios Papastamkos, Bogusław Rogalski, Peter Šťastný, Johan Van Hecke, Zbigniew Zaleski
Enrique Barón Crespo, Daniel Caspary, Giulietto Chiesa, Christofer Fjellner, Béla Glattfelder, Sajjad Karim, Alain Lipietz, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Georgios Papastamkos, Bogusław Rogalski, Peter Šťastný, Johan Van Hecke and Zbigniew Zaleski
Giorgio Carollo, Albert Deß, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, István Szent-Iványi
Giorgio Carollo, Albert Deß, Antolín Sánchez Presedo and István Szent-Iványi
o napredku Romunije na poti k pristopu
on Romania’s progress towards accession
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.........................................................3
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...............................................3
–– ob upoštevanju rednega poročila Komisije za leto 2004 o napredku Romunije na poti k pristopu in strateškega dokumenta Komisije o napredku, doseženem v procesu širitve ( KOM(2004)0657 – C6-0151/2004 )
– having regard to the Commission’s 2004 Regular Report on Romania’s progress towards accession and to the Commission Strategy Paper on progress in the enlargement process (COM(2004) 0657 – C6-0151/2004 )
1 Še neobjavljeno v UL.
Not yet published in OJ. ,
- ob upoštevanju vseh svojih resolucij od začetka procesa pristopa,
– having regard to all its resolutions since the start of the accession process,
- ob upoštevanju člena 45 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6-0061/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0061/2004 ),
A. ker je Romunija dosegla opazen napredek na poti k pristopu k Evropski uniji,
A. whereas Romania has made significant efforts to move towards accession,
B. ker ocena Romunije temelji na popolnem doseganju kobenhavenskih meril in upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Helsinkih 10. in 11. decembra 1999 ter tudi na načelu prilagojene obravnave,
B. whereas the assessment of Romania is based on strict observance of the Copenhagen criteria and the presidency conclusions resulting from the Helsinki European Council of 10 and 11 December 1999, as well as on the principle of a differentiated approach,
Politične razmere in merila
Political situation and criteria
7. poziva Romunijo, predvsem sodne organe, naj v celoti izvajajo zakonodajo o svobodi obveščanja; poziva romunsko vlado in parlament, naj olajšata nadzor njunega delovanja s strani medijev preko povečanja preglednosti zakonodajnega procesa;
Calls on Romania, and in particular the judicial authorities, to give full effect to the laws on freedom of information; calls on the Romanian Government and Parliament to bring greater openness to law-making so that the media can scrutinise their work more easily;
10. pozdravlja do sedaj sprejete ukrepe za razdružitev izvršne oblasti od sodne oblasti, na primer odpravljanje pooblastila sodnega ministra za imenovanje sodnikov ali njihovo napredovanje; ne glede na to izraža veliko zaskrbljenost zaradi ugotovitve Komisije, ki se sklicuje na uradne raziskave, ki potrjujejo, da je lahko izvršna veja oblasti vplivala na izide sodnih postopkov; ponovno poziva, da omogoči, da bo da bo pravosodni sistem bolj neodvisen in strokoven; poziva Romunijo, da ustvari okolje, ki bo ugodnejše za izvajanje sodne oblasti, tako da zaposli več sodnikov in jim ponudi več možnosti usposabljanja na delovnem mestu; poziva Romunijo, da v zvezi s tem področjem upošteva nasvete, predložene v rednem poročilu Komisije, da bi zagotovila ustrezno pravno državo;
Welcomes measures taken thus far to disentangle the executive from the judiciary, such as removing the Minister of Justice’s power to make judicial appointments or promotions; expresses disquiet at the Commission finding referring to official surveys which confirm that the executive continues to influence the outcome of judicial proceedings; renews its call for the judicial system to be made more independent and professional; calls on Romania to create an environment more conducive to the exercise of judicial authority by recruiting more judges and offering them greater opportunities to follow in-service training, including through the use of best practice as tried and tested in the EU countries; calls on Romania to follow all the recommendations of the Commission’s regular report in this area in order to ensure the proper rule of law;
13. izraža zaskrbljenost, kljub zaskrbljenosti, ki jo je izrazila Komisija, da so bile ponovno sprejete iste določbe v Zakonu o splošnih volitvah in da zato, pa tudi zaradi diskriminatornega ravnanja oblasti, ta ista manjšinska organizacija ne more sodelovati na splošnih volitvah;
Expresses disquiet that, despite the concern expressed by the Commission regarding the freedom of association legislation, the registration of alternative political organisations representing national minorities has encountered considerable administrative obstacles, preventing them from participating in elections;
16. čestita Romuniji za njen akcijski načrt iz julija 2004 za sprejetje schengenskih meril in jo poziva, naj ga hitro in v celoti izvede, da bi tako pospešila proces modernizacije svoje opreme, infrastrukture in človeških virov ter izboljšala nadzor svojih meja z Ukrajino in Moldavijo ter nadzor meje na Črnem morju;
Congratulates Romania on its July 2004 action plan on adoption of the Schengen criteria and calls on it to implement the plan rapidly and in full so as to speed up modernisation of its equipment, facilities, and human resources and to improve policing and surveillance of its borders with Ukraine, Moldova, and the Black Sea;
19. meni, da se strategija v zvezi z Romi, izrecno namenjena boju proti diskriminaciji, izvaja, vendar pa povzroča zaskrbljenost, saj Komisija meni, da sta nasilje nad romsko manjšino in diskriminacija te manjšine de facto še zelo razširjena; spodbuja romunsko vlado, da še razširi svojo dejavnost na tem področju ter da dá prednost izobraževanju in grajenju zmogljivosti ter posebnim ukrepom za boj proti diskriminaciji ter pozdravlja ustanovitev nacionalne Agencije za romske zadeve;
Considers that the Roma strategy, aimed expressly at combating discrimination, is admittedly being implemented, but voices its disquiet about the Commission view that violence and de facto discrimination against the Roma minority, even in official institutions, are still very widespread; urges the Romanian Government to continue to expand its action in this area and to prioritise education and capacity-building together with special measures to counteract discrimination; and welcomes the recent establishment of the National Agency for Roma Affairs;
Gospodarska merila
Economic criteria
24. čestita Romuniji za sprejetje obsežne zakonodaje o socialni varnosti, povečanje javne porabe na tem področju ter sprejetje socialnega programa za leti 2003 in 2004, ki naj bi pospeševal solidarnost; hkrati pa poudarja, da mora Romunija sprejeti strožje ukrepe, s katerimi bo ustvarila možnosti za nove poslovne priložnosti v državi, ki pomenijo temelj blaginje v prihodnosti; ter spodbuja Romunijo, da nadaljuje z reformo sistema socialne varnosti in skrbstva;
Congratulates Romania on adopting a substantial body of social welfare legislation, increasing public spending in that area, and adopting a social programme for 2003 and 2004 aimed at fostering solidarity; at the same time stresses that Romania should take more rigorous measures than hitherto to create opportunities for new business starts in the country as a basis for future prosperity; and urges Romania to continue the reform of the social security and welfare system;
25. meni, da je Romunija na veliki večini področij dosegla zadovoljivo raven uskladitve zakonodaje, in da bo lahko, če nadaljuje s tako stopnjo napredka ter spoštuje svoje obveze, dokončala zahtevan prenos zakonodaje še pred načrtovanim datumom pristopa;
Considers that Romania has achieved a satisfactory degree of alignment in the vast majority of areas and that, if it continues to advance at the current rate and honours its undertakings, it will have every prospect of completing the requisite legislative transposition before the scheduled accession date;
29. podpira namero romunske vlade, da razvije delto reke Donave kot področje Natura-2000, in poziva Komisijo, da podpira te dejavnosti kot čezmejni ukrep v zvezi z Ukrajino ter posreduje v porajajočih se navzkrižij interesov, ki bi sicer lahko ovirali popolno zaščito tega pomembnega področja Natura-2000 v EU;
Supports the ambitions of the Romanian Government to develop the Danube Delta as a Natura 2000 area and calls on the Commission to accompany these activities by supporting this as a cross-border measure with Ukraine and by mediating also the ongoing conflict of interests, which could otherwise present an obstacle to the full protection of this important nature area of the EU;
35. poziva vlado, naj nameni več pozornosti izvajanju zakonodaje na področju industrijske politike, ob upoštevanju strukturnih pomanjkljivosti sektorja, ki omejujejo možnosti uporabe;
Calls on the Government to bring the utmost attention to bear on the legislation related to industrial policy, given that the structural weaknesses in the sector limit the capacity for enforcement;
37. poziva Romunijo, naj se še naprej trudi na področju regionalne politike in usklajevanja strukturnih instrumentov, da bi svoje upravne zmogljivosti razvila do ravni, ki bi omogočala polno koriščenje strukturnih instrumentov;
Calls on Romania to continue its efforts as regards regional policy and coordination of structural instruments so as to raise its administrative capacities to a level that would enable it to benefit to the full from the structural instruments;