natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(a) zagotovijo, da je oseba, ki opravlja razgovor, zmožna in ustrezno strokovno usposobljena , da kolikor je mogoče upošteva osebne in splošne okoliščine v zvezi s prošnjo, vključno s poreklom ali ranljivostjo prosilca, in da
(a) ensure that the person who conducts the interview is competent and has received the appropriate training to take account of the personal or general circumstances surrounding the application, including the applicant's cultural origin or vulnerability, insofar as it is possible to do so, and
„ustrezno“ kaže, da je sprejemljiva nižja stopnja usposobljenosti.
"sufficient" appears to indicate lower degree of competence is acceptable.
Razen tega je zaradi občutljive narave izkušenj številnih prosilcev potrebno primerno usposabljanje za spraševalce, da lahko obravnavajo posebne potrebe prosilcev.
As well, given the sensitive nature of many claimants' experiences, appropriate training for the interviewer is required to handle these special needs of applicants.
Države članice prosilcem za azil vse od prvega stika z organi za presojo na njihove lastne stroške omogočijo učinkovito posvetovanje s pravnim ali drugim svetovalcem, ki ga kot takšnega priznava in dopušča nacionalno pravo, o zadevah v zvezi z njihovimi prošnjami za azil.
Member States shall allow applicants for asylum , from the first moment of contact with the determining authorities, at their own cost the opportunity to consult in an effective manner a legal adviser or other counsellor, admitted or permitted as such under national law, on matters relating to their asylum applications.
Številne napake nastanejo na začetku azilnega postopka, ko prosilci napačno razumejo postopke in procese.
Many errors arise at the beginning of the asylum procedure, where claimants misunderstand procedures and processes.
(c) samo pravnim in drugim svetovalcem, ki jih nacionalna zakonodaja izrecno imenuje za pomoč in/ali zastopanje prosilcev za azil ; in/ali
(c) only to legal advisers or other counsellors specifically designated by national law to assist and/or represent applicants for asylum ; and/or
(c) samo pravnim in drugim svetovalcem, ki jih nacionalna zakonodaja izrecno imenuje za pomoč in/ali zastopanje prosilcev za azil .
(c) only to legal advisers or other counsellors specifically designated by national law to assist and/or represent applicants for asylum .
Države članice zagotovijo, da se pravna pomoč in/ali zastopanje, dodeljeno v okviru pododstavka (d), ne omejuje samovoljno.
Member States shall ensure that legal assistance and/or representation granted under subparagraph (d) is not arbitrarily restricted.
Spodkopava člen 13(2), ki je bistven zaščitni ukrep v azilnem procesu.
Erodes Article 13(2), which is an essential safeguard in the asylum process.
V teh primerih mora biti dostop do podatkov ali virov na razpolago organom iz Poglavja V, razen kadar je tak dostop izključen zaradi jasno določenih primerov nacionalne varnosti.
In these cases, access to the information or sources in question must be available to the authorities referred to in Chapter V, except where such access is precluded in clearly defined national security cases.
(c) je ali je bila poročena.
(c) is married or has been married.
Mladoletna oseba brez spremstva ne sme izgubiti pravice, ki jo ima na podlagi te kategorije, zaradi zakonskega statusa.
An unaccompanied minor should not lose any rights given to him/her under this category by virtue of his/her marital status.
Člen 15, odstavek 5, točka (a)
Article 15, paragraph 5, point (a)
(a) se mladoletne osebe brez spremstva obvestijo o možnosti določitve starosti z zdravniškim pregledom pred obravnavo njihove prošnje za azil, in to v jeziku, za katerega se upravičeno meni, da ga razumejo.
(a) unaccompanied minors are informed prior to the examination of their application for asylum, and in a language which they may reasonably be supposed to understand, about the possibility of age determination by a medical examination.
Obvestilo naj vključuje informacije o načinu pregleda in o možnih posledicah rezultata zdravniškega pregleda za obravnavo prošnje za azil, ter tudi o posledicah, če mladoletna oseba brez spremstva odkloni takšen zdravniški pregled;
This shall include information on the method of examination and the possible consequences of the result of the medical examination for the examination of the application for asylum, as well as the consequences of refusal on the part of the unaccompanied minor to undergo the medical examination.
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice).
(Does not affect the English version).
Predlog spremembe ne zadeva slovenske različice.
This amendment has no effect on the English version.
Dovoljene izjeme se uporabijo, le če je to potrebno za:
Permissible exceptions may only be resorted to, where necessary, in order:
(a) ugotavljanje istovetnosti;
(a) to verify identity;
(b) obravnavo primerov, v katerih so begunci ali prosilci za azil uničili svoje potne listine in/ali osebne dokumente ali uporabili ponarejene dokumente, da bi zavedli organe države, v kateri nameravajo zaprositi za azil;
(b) to deal with cases where refugees or asylum-seekers have destroyed their travel and/or identity documents or have used fraudulent documents in order to mislead the authorities of the State in which they intend to claim asylum;
(c) zaščito nacionalne varnosti ali javnega reda.
(c) to protect national security or public order.
V spremenjenih smernicah UNHCR o veljavnih merilih in standardih v zvezi s pridržanjem prosilcev za azil so opredeljene dovoljene izjeme k splošnemu pravilu, da se je pridržanju prosilcev za azil treba izogibati in uporabiti le v skrajnem primeru.
UNHCR Revised Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards Relating to the Detention of Asylum Seekers, which outline permissible exceptions to the general rule that detention of asylum-seekers should be avoided and used only as a last resort.
Poleg tega je ECHR v zadevi Amuur proti Franciji določilo, da se morajo razlogi za pridržanje jasno obrazložiti.
Further, as outlined in Amuur v. France by the ECHR, grounds for detention must be clearly outlined.
Kadar je prosilec pridržan iz razlogov, ki niso povezani z njegovo/njeno prošnjo za azil , države članice zagotovijo možnost pospešenega sodnega postopka.
Where an applicant for asylum is held in detention for reasons unrelated to his/her asylum application , Member States shall ensure that :
(a) možnost pospešenega sodnega postopka ;
(a) there is the possibility of speedy judicial review ;
(b) da ima prosilec dostop do pravne, zdravstvene in socialne pomoči;
(b) the applicant has access to legal, medical and social assistance;
(c) da je prosilec nemudoma obveščen o razlogih za pridržanje v jeziku, ki ga razume;
(c) the applicant is informed promptly about the grounds of the detention in a language he/she understands;
(d) da ima prosilec pravico do obiskov pravnih zastopnikov ter zastopnikov UNHCR in drugih organizacij, ki delajo s prosilci za azil.
(d) the applicant has the right to visits by legal representatives and by representatives from the UNHCR and other organisations specifically working with asylum applicants .
Za zagotovitev, da ne prihaja do kršitve člena 31 Konvencije iz leta 1951, in zagotovitev usklajenosti z zahtevami ECHR in ICCPR po „zakonitosti“ odvzema prostosti.
This amendment is to ensure there is no violation of Article 31 of the 1951 Convention and to ensure compatibility with ECHR and ICCPR requirements of ‘legality’ for deprivations of liberty.
Za pododstavek (b), gl. zadevo Ammur proti Franciji 0019776/92, 1996-III, št. 11, 25. junij 1996.
Subparagraph (b), see Amuur v. France 0019776/92, 1996-III, No 11, 25 June 1996.
Pododstavek (c) se nanaša na člen 5(2) ECHR: „Vsakdo, ki je aretiran, mora biti takoj v jeziku, ki ga razume, obveščen o razlogih za aretacijo in o obtožbi proti njemu.“
Subparagraph (c) refers to Article 5(2) of the ECHR: ‘Everyone who is arrested shall be informed promptly, in a language which he understands, of the reasons for his arrest and the charge against him’.
Pododstavek (d) se nanaša na spremenjene smernice UNHCR o veljavnih merilih in standardih v zvezi s pridržanjem prosilcev za azil.
Subparagraph (d) refers to the UNHCR Revised Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards Relating to the Detention of Asylum Seekers.
Za zagotovitev, da ne prihaja do kršitve člena 31 Konvencije iz leta 1951, in zagotovitev usklajenosti z zahtevami ECHR in ICCPR po „zakonitosti“ odvzema prostosti.
To ensure there is no violation of Article 31 of 1951 Convention and is compatible with ECHR and ICCPR requirements of "legality" for deprivations of liberty.
Države članice so dolžne omogočiti UNHCR:
Member States are obliged to allow the UNHCR:
Izraz „neposredno“ je odprt za neskladja in tvega ogrozitev učinkovitosti kot zaščitnega ukrepa.
"directly" is open to discrepancy and risks compromising efficacy as a safeguard.
Člen 23, odstavek 4, točka (a)
Article 23, paragraph 4, point (a)
(a) prosilec pri oddaji svoje prošnje in predstavljanju dejstev sproži samo tista vprašanja, ki niso pomembna ali pa le minimalno pomembna za obravnavo vprašanja, ali je prosilec upravičen do statusa begunca na podlagi Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES ; ali
(a) the applicant in submitting his/her application and presenting the fact, has only raised issues that are not relevant or of minimal relevance to the examination of whether he/she qualifies as a refugee by virtue of Council Directive 2004/83/EC ; or
(a) prosilec pri oddaji svoje prošnje in predstavljanju dejstev sproži samo tista vprašanja, ki niso pomembna za obravnavo vprašanja, ali je prosilec upravičen do statusa begunca na podlagi Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES; ali
(a) the applicant in submitting his/her application and presenting the fact, has only raised issues that are not relevant to the examination of whether he/she qualifies as a refugee by virtue of Council Directive 2004/83 EC; or
Izraz „minimalno pomembna“ prosilcu ne dodeli pravne varnosti, ker je preveč nejasen in ogroža načelo nevračanja.
The terminology "minimal relevance" does not grant legal security to the applicant because it is too vague and puts the principle of non-refoulement at risk.
(d) je prosilec zavajal organe tako, da je dajal napačne dokumente o svoji identiteti in/ali državljanstvu; ali
(d) the applicant has misled the authorities by presenting false documents with respect to his/her identity and/or nationality; or
Države članice bi morale določiti izjeme pri izvajanju odstavka 4, v skladu s katerim se postopek obravnave prošenj za azil izvede prednostno ali se pospeši, zlasti zaradi humanitarnih ali političnih razlogov ali razlogov v zvezi z mednarodnim javnim pravom.
Member States should lay down exceptions from the application of paragraph 4 which provide for asylum applications to be subject to a priority or accelerated examination procedure, particularly for humanitarian or political reasons or for reasons of public international law.
Iste določbe vsebuje tudi člen 35a(4) Direktive.
The same provisions are also contained in Article 35a(4) of the Directive.
Člen 25, odstavek 2, točka (d)
Article 25, paragraph 2, point (d)
(d) se prosilcu dovoli, da ostane v zadevni državi članici iz kakega drugega razloga, in se mu zato dodeli status, ki nudi enake pravice in ugodnosti kot status begunca na podlagi Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES ;
(d) the applicant is allowed to remain in the Member State concerned on some other ground and as result of this he/she has been granted a status equivalent to the rights and benefits of the refugee status by virtue of Council Directive 2004/83/EC;
(d) se prosilcu dovoli, da ostane v zadevni državi članici iz kakega drugega razloga, in se mu zato dodeli status, ki ponuja enake pravice in ugodnosti kot jih imajo državljani v skladu s členom 1(E) Ženevske konvencije;
(d) the applicant is allowed to remain in the Member State concerned on some other ground and as result of this he/she has been granted a status equivalent to the rights and benefits of nationals in accordance with Article 1(E) of the Geneva Convention;
Biti mora obsežno kot Konvencija iz leta 1951, člen 1E.
Must be as broad as the 1951 Convention, Article 1E.
Direktiva Sveta 2004/83/EC tudi ne vključuje vseh pravic iz konvencije, ki so naštete v členu 1E.
Also, the Council Directive 2004/83/EC does not incorporate all Convention rights as listed in Article 1E.
Člen 25, odstavek 2, točka (e)
Article 25, paragraph 2, point (e)
(e) se prosilcu dovoli, da ostane na ozemlju zadevne države članice iz nekih drugih razlogov, ki ga ščitijo pred izročitvijo do izida postopka za določanje statusa v skladu z (d);
(e) the applicant is allowed to remain in the territory of the Member State concerned on some other grounds which protect him/her against refoulement pending the outcome of a procedure for the determination of a status pursuant to (d);
(Predlog spremembe zapade v primeru zavrnitve predloga spremembe 65.)
(This amendment falls if amendment 65 is rejected.)
Če predlog spremembe 65 ni sprejet, člen 25 (2e) ne bo v nasprotju s Konvencijo iz leta 1951.
If amendment 65 is not accepted, than Article 25 (2e) will not be running counter to the 1951 Convention.
Člen 25, odstavek 2, točka (g)
Article 25, paragraph 2, point (g)
(g) vzdrževanec prosilca vloži prošnjo, potem ko se je v skladu s členom 5(3) strinjal, da bo njegov primer del prošnje, ki je bila vložena v njegovem imenu, in ni nikakršnih dejstev v zvezi s položajem vzdrževanca, ki bi upravičila ločeno prošnjo.
(g) a dependant of the applicant lodges an application, after he/she has in accordance with Article 5 (3), consented to have his/her case be part of an application made on his/her behalf and there are no facts relating to the dependant's situation justifying a separate application.
Prosilec, ki je vzdrževanec, ne bo kaznovan zaradi zamude posamezne prošnje, ker je zamudo posamezne prošnje lahko povzročil osebni pretres ali ker zadevni skrbnik odstopa od svojih odgovornosti.
An applicant who is a dependent shall not be penalised for a delayed individual application as personal trauma may have delayed an individual application or the guardian in question relinquishes his/her responsibilities.
Vsak vlagatelj ima pravico do analize prošnje za azil iz posameznih razlogov.
Each claimant shall have his/her right to have their asylum request analysed on individual grounds.
(a) življenje in svoboda nista ogroženi zaradi rase, vere, državljanstva, pripadnosti določeni družbeni skupini ali političnega prepričanja; in da
(a) life and liberty are not threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and
Obrazložitev: ne nujno kot sklicevanje na Ženevsko konvencijo bo člen 27, odstavek 1a (novo) vključeval to točko.
Justification: not necessary as reference to the Geneva Convention in Article 27, paragraph 1a new will cover this point.
Člen 27, odstavek 2, točka (a)
Article 27, paragraph 2, point (a)
(a) pravili, ki zahtevajo smiselno povezavo med osebo, ki išče azil, in zadevno tretjo državo, na podlagi katerih bi bilo upravičeno, da ta oseba odide v to državo;
(a) rules requiring a meaningful link between the person seeking asylum and the third country concerned based on which it would reasonable for that person to go to that country;
Izraz „povezava“ lahko vodi k pomenu, da je prosilec prečkal državo tranzita.
A “connection” could be conduced to mean the applicant passed the country in transit.
Za prenos v tretjo državo pa mora biti med prosilcem in zadevno državo „smiselna“ povezava prek družine, širše skupnosti itd.
Yet, in order to be transferred to the third country, the applicant must have a “meaningful” link with the country in question via family, a broader community, etc.
Ogroža člen 29, odstavek 1.
Undermines Article 29, paragraph 1.
Svet lahko na predlog Komisije in po posvetu z Evropskim parlamentom s kvalificirano večino sprejme minimalni skupni seznam tretjih držav , ki jih bodo države članice štele za varne države v skladu s Prilogo II .
The Council shall, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament , adopt a minimum common list of third countries that shall be regarded by Member States as safe countries of origin in accordance with Annex II.
Svet lahko na predlog Komisije s kvalificirano večino in v skladu s členom 251 Pogodbe sprejme skupni seznam tretjih držav.
The Council shall, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and in accordance with Article 251 of the Treaty , adopt a common list of third countries.
Svet lahko na predlog Komisije s kvalificirano večino in v skladu s členom 251 Pogodbe spremeni skupni seznam tako, da doda ali odstrani tretje države v skladu s Prilogo II.
The Council may, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and in accordance with Article 251 of the Treaty , amend the common list by adding or removing third countries, in accordance with Annex II.
Člen 67(5) EC poudarja, da je treba sprejeti nadaljnje ukrepe na podlagi soodločanja.
Article 67(5) of the EC outlines that further measures must be adopted under co-decision.
Ter v skladu s členom 251 Pogodbe EC.
And in accordance with Article 251 of the EC Treaty.
Pri pripravi predloga po odstavkih 1 ali 2, Komisija uporabi podatke držav članic, svoje lastne podatke in , kadar je potrebno, podatke UNHCR, Sveta Evrope in drugih ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij.
When making its proposal under paragraphs 1 or 2, the Commission shall make use of information from the Member States, its own information and , where necessary, information from UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Pri pripravi predloga po odstavkih 1 ali 2, Komisija uporabi podatke držav članic, svoje lastne podatke in podatke UNHCR, Sveta Evrope in drugih ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij.
When making its proposal under paragraphs 1 or 2, the Commission shall make use of information from the Member States, its own information and information from UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Ob upoštevanju vedno spreminjajočih se razmer človekovih pravic v tretjih državah morajo države članice uporabiti vse ustrezne podatke, ker imajo organizacije, kot na primer UNHCR, razpoložljivih več najnovejših podatkov glede na njihove strokovnjake na področju.
Given the ever-changing human rights situations in third countries, Member States should make use of all relevant information, as organisations such as UNHCR. have more up-to-date information available given their expertise in the field.
Neuporaba takšnih podatkov bi lahko bila škodljiva za varnost prosilca v skladu s Konvencijo iz leta 1951.
Not making use of such data could be detrimental to the applicant’s safety in line with the 1951 Convention.
Kadar Svet od Komisije zahteva pripravo , v skladu s členom 251 Pogodbe, predloga za odstranitev tretje države s skupnega seznama, se pravica držav članic v zvezi s to tretjo državo v skladu s členom 30 B(2) prekine z dnem, ki sledi odločitvi, s katero Svet zahteva, da se pripravi takšen predlog.
Where the Council requests the Commission to submit , pursuant to Article 251 of the Treaty, a proposal for removing a third country from the common list, the right of Member States pursuant to Article 30B(2) shall be suspended with regard to this third country as of the day following the Council decision requesting such a submission.
V skladu s sporazumi iz Tampereja in izvajanjem Haaškega programa je predvidena uvedba soodločanja za Evropski parlament na področju politike azila in migracij.
Following the agreements of Tampere and the implementaion of the Hague programme, the introduction of codecision is foreseen for the European Parliament in the field of asylum and migration policies.
Kadar država članica od Komisije zahteva, naj Svetu predloži predlog za odstranitev tretje države z minimalnega skupnega seznama, ta država članica pisno obvesti Svet o zahtevi, naslovljeni na Komisijo.
Where a Member State requests the Commission to submit a proposal to the Council for removing a third country from the minimum common list, that Member State shall notify the Council in writing of the request made to the Commission.
Kadar država članica ali Evropski parlament od Komisije zahteva, naj Svetu predloži predlog za odstranitev tretje države s skupnega seznama, ta država članica pisno obvesti Svet o zahtevi, naslovljeni na Komisijo.
Where a Member State or the European Parliament requests the Commission to submit a proposal to the Council for removing a third country from the common list, that Member State shall notify the Council in writing of the request made to the Commission.
Glej obrazložitev člena 30, odstavek 4.
See justification for Article 30, paragraph 4.
Prekinitve se v vsakem primeru zaključijo, če Svet zavrne predlog Komisije za umik tretje države s seznama.
The suspensions shall end in any case where the Council rejects, a proposal by the Commission to withdraw the third country from the list.
Prekinitve se v vsakem primeru zaključijo, če Svet in Evropski parlament zavrneta predlog Komisije za umik tretje države s seznama.
The suspensions shall end in any case where the Council and the European Parliament reject a proposal by the Commission to withdraw the third country from the list.
Komisija na zahtevo Sveta in Evropskega parlamenta poroča Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu, ali so razmere v državi, ki je na skupnem seznamu, še vedno v skladu s Prilogo II.
Upon request by the Council and the European Parliament , the Commission shall report to the Council and the European Parliament on whether the situation of a country on the common list is still in conformity with Annex II.
Člen 30A, odstavek 2, uvodni del
Article 30A, paragraph 2, introductory part
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 lahko države članice ob sprejetju te direktive ohranijo ali uvedejo zakonodajo, ki v skladu s Prilogo II dopušča nacionalno določitev tretjih držav, ki se ne pojavljajo na minimalnem skupnem seznamu, kot varnih izvornih držav za obravnavo prošenj za azil, kadar so prepričane, da osebe v zadevnih tretjih državah niso podvržene:
By derogation to paragraph 1, Member States may retain legislation in force at the time of adoption of this Directive that allows for the national designation of third countries, other than those appearing on the minimum common list, as safe countries of origin for the purposes of examining applications for asylum where they are satisfied that persons in the third countries concerned are neither subject to:
Da država članica tretjo državo označi za varno državo, mora biti prepričana, da zadevna tretja država članica ne izvaja preganjanja, mučenja, nečloveškega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja.
For a Member State to designate a third country as a safe country of origin it is absolutely essential for it to ensure that the third country concerned does not engage in persecution or torture or carry out inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Člen 30A, odstavek 4
Article 30A, paragraph 4
Pri ocenjevanju, ali je država varna izvorna država v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3, države članice upoštevajo pravne okoliščine, spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, uporaba prava in splošne politične okoliščine v zadevni tretji državi.
In assessing whether a country is a safe country of origin in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3, Member States shall have regard to the legal situation , respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms , the application of the law and the general political circumstances in the third country concerned.
Člen 30B, odstavek 2
Article 30B, paragraph 2
Države članice v skladu z odstavkom 1 štejejo prošnjo za azil nesprejemljivo, kadar je tretja država določena kot varna v skladu s členo 30 .
Member States shall, in accordance with paragraph 1, consider the application for asylum as unfounded where the third country is designated as safe pursuant to Article 30 .
Države članice v skladu z odstavkom 1 štejejo prošnjo za azil nesprejemljivo, kadar je tretja država določena kot varna za nekega prosilca .
Member States shall, in accordance with paragraph 1, consider the application for asylum as unfounded where the third country is designated as safe for the particular applicant .