natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mora si prizadevati zagotoviti več podpore projektom, ki bodo spodbudili konkurenčnost in rast držav AKP, ne da bi znižala porabo za zdravstvo in izobraževanje.
However, the EU must work to ensure that more support is given to projects which will boost ACP competitiveness and growth without reducing spending on health and education.
Domnevno preimenovanje obstoječega denarja v „pomoč za trgovino“ in nezmožnost držav članic, da bi pojasnile, kako se bosta usklajevali dvostranska podpora, iz katere morajo priti sredstva poleg ERS, in podpora sporazumom o gospodarskem partnerstvu, sta okrepila sumničenja držav AKP, da v praksi ne bo na voljo toliko denarja, kot ga je prikazanega na papirju.
Suspected re-labelling of existing money as "Aid for Trade" and the failure of Member States to clarify how bilateral support, which is where funds additional to the EDF must come from, will be coordinated with EPA-support has exacerbated ACP suspicions that there won't be as much money available in practice as there appears on paper.
Poročilo ponuja Komisiji pravočasno opozorilo, da se rok, 1. januar 2008, nezadržno približuje in da ostaja zaskrbljujoče veliko neopravljenega dela.
This report provides a timely reminder to the Commission that the deadline of 1st January 2008 is fast approaching and a worrying amount remains to be done.
Na resne dvome o zmožnostih in pripravljenosti številnih držav AKP, da bi uresničile ambiciozne predloge Komisije najbrž ne bo odgovora pred koncem leta 2007.
Serious questions about the capacity, and willingness, of many ACP countries to implement the ambitious proposals made by the Commission are unlikely to be answered before the end of 2007.
Namen pregleda, ki ga zahteva člen 37(4) Sporazuma iz Cotonouja, je določiti, ali je ostalo dovolj časa za zaključek pogajanj do roka.
The Article 37(4) Review, required by Cotonou, was intended to assess whether or not enough time remained for negotiations to be completed by the deadline.
Ker pregled ni uspel „vključiti vseh zainteresiranih strani, tudi nedržavnih akterjev in poslancev, in se posvetovati z njimi“
The failure of the Review to be "inclusive and consultative with all stakeholders including non-state actors and parliamentarians"
K čemur je v Port Moresbyju pozval Svet AKP , je še toliko bolj nujna druga resolucija Evropskega parlamenta, v kateri ta izraža skrb zaradi počasnega napredovanja pogajanj, zlasti ob upoštevanju roka.
Called for in Port Moresby by the ACP Council makes a second resolution of the European Parliament expressing concern at the slow progress in talks all the more urgent, particularly with regard to the deadline.
Ta cilj štejejo vse regije v najboljšem primeru za izjemno ambicioznega.
In all regions this target is considered extremely ambitious at best.
Čeprav prisilni sporazum ni v nikogaršnjem interesu, tudi osredotočanje na še eno oprostitev STO ne bo rešilo osnovnih problemov, zaradi katerih je bilo že od začetka tako težko doseči napredek v pogajanjih o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
While it is in no one's interests to have a forced agreement, focussing on another WTO waiver will not solve the underlying problems that have made progress in EPA negotiations so difficult from the beginning.
Pri obravnavi roka je tako kot pri postopni liberalizaciji potrebna uravnoteženost.
With regard to the question of the deadline, like in case of the phasing of liberalisation, a balance is needed.
Zagon za sprejemanje težkih odločitev se brez roka ali časovnega razporeda liberalizacije izgubi, če pa so partnerji prisiljeni v prehitre odločitve, bo vpliv na razvoj verjetno negativen.
The impetus to make difficult decisions is lost without a deadline or liberalisation schedule but if partners are forced to move too quickly the development impact is likely to be negative.
Na ravni STO nihče ne ve, kaj se bo zgodilo 1. januarja 2008, če v svet mednarodne trgovine ne bo vstopilo šest popolnoma novih sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
At the WTO level no one knows what will happen if on 1st January 2008 six shiny new EPAs do not march forth into the world of international trade.
Če bi nekatere regije potrebovale več časa, poročevalec meni, da do dokončnega dogovora izvoz AKP v EU ne bi smel biti prizadet.
In the event that some regions need more time, your rapporteur believes that ACP exports to the EU should not be harmed pending a final settlement.
Pogajalci morajo vztrajati pri pogajanjih, da bi dosegli vsem koristen dogovor o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu, ki bo pomagal razvoju držav AKP.
Negotiators must press on with negotiating to reach a mutually beneficial settlement on EPAs which will help ACP countries' development.
S spremljanjem poslancev in drugih zainteresiranih skupin ter z večjim posvetovanjem z njimi moramo dobiti sporazume o gospodarskem partnerstvu, ki bodo del usklajene strategije za razvoj AKP, vendar brez prisile.
Observed by and in greater consultation with Parliamentarians and other interested parties, we must get EPAs which are part of a coordinated strategy for the ACP's development, but this cannot be imposed.
Če naj delujejo, morajo biti sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu resnično partnerstvo.
EPAs must be a genuine partnership if they are going to work.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0587 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0587 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0402/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0402/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0085/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0085/2007 ),
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 Člen 11, odstavek 6, alineji 1 in 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 2371/2002)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 Article 11, paragraph 6, indents 1 and 2 (Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002)
– 4 % povprečne letne tonaže, ki je bila med 1. januarjem 2003 in 31. decembrom 2006 za države članice, ki so bile 1. januarja 2003 članice Skupnosti, zmanjšana z državno pomočjo, in 4 % povprečne letne tonaže, ki je bila med 1. majem 2004 in 31. decembrom 2006 za države članice, ki so pristopile k Skupnosti 1. maja 2004, zmanjšana z državno pomočjo, ter
- 4 % of the average annual tonnage withdrawn with public aid between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006 for the Member States that were part of the Community on 1 January 2003 and 4 % of the annual average tonnage withdrawn with public aid between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2006 for the Member States that acceded to the Community on 1 May 2004 and,
– 10 % povprečne letne tonaže, ki je bila med 1. januarjem 2003 in 31. decembrom 2006 za države članice, ki so bile 1. januarja 2003 članice Skupnosti, zmanjšana z državno pomočjo, in 10 % povprečne letne tonaže, ki je bila med 1. majem 2004 in 31. decembrom 2006 za države članice, ki so pristopile k Skupnosti 1. maja 2004, zmanjšana z državno pomočjo, ter
- 10 % of the average annual tonnage withdrawn with public aid between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006 for the Member States that were part of the Community on 1 January 2003 and 10 % of the annual average tonnage withdrawn with public aid between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2006 for the Member States that acceded to the Community on 1 May 2004 and,
– 4 % tonaže ladjevja, ki bo po 1. januarju 2007 zmanjšana z državno pomočjo.
- 4 % of the tonnage withdrawn from the fleet with public aid as from 1 January 2007
– 10 % tonaže ladjevja, ki bo po 1. januarju 2007 zmanjšana z državno pomočjo.
- 10 % of the tonnage withdrawn from the fleet with public aid as from 1 January 2007
Predlagana ponovna dodelitev 4 % tonaže, ki je bila zmanjšana z državno pomočjo, je zelo nizka v primerjavi z vsem priobalnim ribiškim ladjevjem in ne zadošča za izboljšanje varnosti, higiene, delovnih pogojev in kakovosti proizvodov na krovu.
The proposed reallocation of 4% of the tonnage withdrawn with public aid is too low in relation to the whole of the coastal fishing fleet and is not sufficient to improve safety, hygiene, working conditions and product quality on board.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2 Člen 13, odstavek 2, točka c, pododstavka 1a in 1b (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 2371/2002)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2 Article 13, paragraph 1, point (c), subparagraphs 1 a and 1 b (new) (Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002)
Vseeno to zmanjšanje moči motorja v nobenem primeru ne sme zmanjšati varnosti plovila, udobnosti bivanja v njem ali učinkovitosti sistemov za predelavo rib.
Nevertheless, this reduction in power must not under any circumstances diminish the vessel's safeness , habitability or the efficiency of fish-processing systems.
Poleg tega se glede na to, da je cilj tega zmanjšanja izogib vsakršnemu povečanju ribolovne zmogljivosti plovila, določbe prvega pododstavka ne upoštevajo, kjer se motor zamenja zavoljo ohranjanja energije in/ali izboljšanja drugih zmogljivosti plovila poleg ribolovne zmogljivosti, ali kjer so bili izbrani bolj selektivni načini ribolova, kar zadeva uporabo plovila.
Furthermore, given that the objective of the reduction is to avoid any increase in the vessel's fishing capacity, the provisions of the first subparagraph shall not be taken into account where the engine is replaced in order to conserve energy and/or improve the vessel's performance in areas other than fishing capacity, or where more selective fishing methods, as regards the use of the vessel, have been opted for.
V juniju 2006, po političnem sporazumu s Svetom o novem evropskem skladu za ribištvo, je bilo sklenjeno, da se spremenita dve določbi temeljne uredbe o revidirani ribiški politiki (2371/2002), ki se nanašata na upravljanje zmogljivosti ribiškega ladjevja.
In June 2006, after the political agreement reached in the Council on the new European Fisheries Fund, a decision was taken to amend two provisions of the basic regulation on the revised common fisheries policy (2371/2002) applying to the management of fishing fleet capacity.
Cilj teh sprememb je omogočiti nekatere prilagoditve ladjevja zaradi izboljšanja varnosti, delovnih pogojev, higiene in kakovosti proizvodov na krovu, ter izboljšati energetsko učinkovitost.
The amendment is aimed at permitting some adaptations of the fleet to improve safety, working conditions and hygiene, product quality on board and energy efficiency.
Predlagani sta bili spremembi dveh členov poglavja III Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002: člena 11 o prilagoditvi ribolovne zmogljivosti in člena 13 o sistemu vstopa/izstopa in zmanjšanju celotne zmogljivosti.
More specifically, it is proposed to amend two articles in Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002: Article 11 on the adjustment of fishing capacity and Article 13 on the entry-exit scheme and overall capacity reduction.
(a) Novi člen 11 daje možnost uporabe 4 % zmanjšane tonaže ali tonaže, ki bo zmanjšana z državno pomočjo, z namenom, da se predvidijo dela za posodobitev ribiških ladij zaradi večje varnosti, higiene in izboljšanja delovnih pogojev za ribiče na krovu.
(a) The new Article 11 provides for the possibility to use 4% of the tonnage withdrawn or the tonnage to be withdrawn with public aid in order to carry out work to modernise fishing vessels in the context of safety and hygiene requirements and improve working conditions on board vessels;
(b) Da bi nadaljevali z obstoječo politiko zmanjševanja ribolovne zmogljivosti, novi člen 13 uvaja določbo, na podlagi katere določba o zmanjšanju moči motorja, ki je bil s tem namenom zamenjan s sredstvi državne pomoči, ne more biti ponovno vnesena.
(b) The new Article 13, in keeping with the existing policy on fishing capacity reduction, adds a provision to the effect that the reduction in power linked to the replacement of the engine with public aid cannot be rebuilt.
Poročevalec izraža zadovoljstvo, ker Komisije predlaga spremembo temeljne uredbe o skupni ribiški politiki pri točkah o upravljanju zmogljivosti ribiškega ladjevja.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal to amend the basic regulation on the common fisheries policy as regards the management of fleet capacity.
Ta sprememba bo državam članicam omogočila omejeno povečanje tonaže njihovega ladjevja, kar bo prispevalo k izboljšanju varnosti, delovnih pogojev, higiene, kakovosti proizvodov na krovu ter energetske učinkovitosti.
The amendment will give the Member States the possibility for a limited increase in the capacity of their fleet for the purpose of improving safety, working conditions, hygiene and product quality on board, as well as energy efficiency.
Poročevalec se strinja, da mora biti ta odstotek prednostno dodeljen plovilom za priobalni ribolov, torej plovilom krajšim od 12 metrov, ker je treba upoštevati dvoje: da je sektor že utrpel veliko škodo zaradi sprememb pri pogojih za ribolov ter da ni gotovo, da je sposoben za preživetje.
The rapporteur agrees that, when allocating this percentage, priority should be given to small-scale coastal fishing vessels, i.e. vessels with an overall length of less than 12 metres, since this sector has been badly affected by the change in fishing conditions and its viability is uncertain.
Vendar poročevalec meni, da možnost ponovne razdelitve 4 % zmanjšane tonaže z državno pomočjo ne bo dejansko pomagala zadevnemu sektorju, saj predstavljajo mala plovila več kot 80 % ribiškega ladjevja.
The rapporteur nevertheless takes the view that the possibility of reallocating 4% of the tonnage withdrawn with public aid will not provide any real assistance for the sector concerned, since it represents more than 80% of the fishing fleet.
Gre torej za zelo nizke odstotke, ki jih je treba razdeliti na veliko število plovil.
In this light, 4% is a very small percentage which will have to be shared among a very large number of vessels.
Glede na podatke iz registra ribiškega ladjevja Skupnosti je bila zmogljivost v letih 2003, 2004 in 2005 zmanjšana za 132 000 bruto tonaže.
According to the Community register of fishing vessels, around 132 000 GT were withdrawn with public aid in 2003, 2004 and 2005.
Točneje, stare države članice so zmanjšale zmogljivost za 112 000 BT (6,27 %), od maja 2004 pa nove države članice še za dodatnih 20 000 BT (18,48 %).
Of this total, 112 000 GT were withdrawn by the old Member States (6.27%), with a further 20 000 GT being withdrawn since May 2004 by the new Member States (18.48%).
4 % tega deleža je zelo malo glede na to, da morajo biti razdeljeni med ladjevje vseh držav članic.
4% of this is an extremely small amount, bearing in mind that it will have to be distributed among the Member States' fishing fleets.
Še posebej je to zanemarljivo za tiste države članice, ki so si za prednostno nalogo zadale posodobitev ladjevja za priobalni ribolov.
For Member States which have given priority to the modernisation of the coastal fishing fleet, this possibility is negligible.
Treba je poudariti, da je do zmanjšanja tonaže prišlo predvsem zaradi dokončnega prenehanja ribolovne dejavnosti.
It should be pointed out that the reduction in tonnage has been achieved largely thanks to schemes geared to the permanent cessation of fishing activities.
Ker tovrstna sprememba ne poveča ribolovne zmogljivosti plovila, poročevalec meni, da bi predlagano zmerno povečanje odstotka – 10 % od skupnega zmanjšanja tonaže z državno pomočjo – lahko izboljšalo delovne pogoje in higieno na krovu.
The rapporteur takes the view that, given that the actual amendment does not increase the vessels’ capacity, a slight increase in the proposed percentage – 10% of the total tonnage scrapped with public aid – could improve working and hygiene conditions on board.
Še bolj pomembno pa je dejstvo, da bi to izboljšalo konkurenčnost priobalnega ribolova, ki ima velik gospodarski in socialni pomen za obalno prebivalstvo.
Still more importantly, this would improve the competitiveness of the coastal fleet, which has a significant socio-economic impact on the communities concerned.
Predlog poročevalca ne prinaša upravnih ali finančnih bremen, temveč je v skladu z duhom političnega sporazuma.
Your rapporteur’s proposal does not pose any administrative or financial burden but tallies with the spirit of the political agreement.
Drugače povedano, novi predpisi za upravljanje ladjevja se bodo izvajali z že obstoječimi človeškimi in finančnimi viri.
In other words, the application of the new rules on fleet management is guaranteed with existing human and budgetary resources.
Kar zadeva spremembo črke c) prvega odstavka člena 13, gre za novo določbo, na podlagi katere določba o zmanjšanju moči motorja, ki je bil s tem namenom zamenjan s sredstvi državne pomoči, ne more biti ponovno vnesena.
As regards the amendment to Article 13(1)(c), a new provision is being introduced according to which the reduction in power following the replacement of an engine with public aid may not be restored.
Nova določba je bila dodana, da bi bila nova uredba v skladu s ciljem za zmanjšanje zmogljivosti ribiškega ladjevja, ki je predvideno tudi v evropskem skladu za ribištvo,
The new provision has been added to make the new regulation compatible with the objective of fleet capacity reduction laid down in the European Fisheries Fund.
točneje v členu 25(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1198/2006, ki od 1. januarja 2003 predvideva finančno pomoč za eno zamenjavo motorja na ribiško plovilo glede na vrsto plovila: če so plovila namenjena priobalnemu ribolovu, če torej njihova dolžina ne presega 12 metrov, bo moč novega motorja enaka moči starega motorja, pri večjih plovilih pa je predvideno zmanjšanje moči novega motorja za 20 %.
Specifically, reference is made to Article 25(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006, which offers the possibility of changing the engines of fishing vessels with financial support varying according to the type of vessel: where vessels belong to the small-scale coastal fleet, i.e. if they are no more than 12 metres in length, the new engine must have the same power as the old one, whilst for larger vessels the new engine must have at least 20% less power.
Poročevalec izraža zadovoljstvo, ker bodo zainteresirane osebe lahko zamenjale motor na svojih plovilih z državno pomočjo.
The rapporteur is satisfied at the fact that stakeholders will be able to replace their vessel's engine with public aid.
Vendar meni, da če je pomoč za zamenjavo motorja na plovilih, ki so daljša od 12 metrov, vezana na obvezno zmanjšanje moči motorja za 20 %, ima to lahko posledice za varnost plovil in posadke.
He nevertheless takes the view that linking aid for replacing the engines of vessels with a length of over 12 metres to the compulsory 20% reduction in power may have repercussions on the safety of vessels and crews.
Poleg tega se lahko na ta način skorajda onemogoči nekatere načine ribarjenja, kar lahko privede do socialnih in gospodarskih posledic.
Moreover, some fishing methods are thereby rendered virtually impossible, and this will have social and economic consequences.
Poročevalec meni, da je skupna ribiška politika sprejela ustrezne ukrepe za zmanjšanje obsega presežnega ribolova.
The rapporteur notes that the common fisheries policy has introduced measures likely to reduce excess fishing capacity.
Najboljši dokaz za to je register ribiškega ladjevja Skupnosti.
This is demonstrated by the Community fishing fleet register.
V letih 2003, 2004 in 2005 je z državno pomočjo prišlo do zmanjšanja zmogljivosti za 427 000 kW.
In 2003, 2004 and 2005, 427 000 kW were withdrawn with public aid.
Velika večina tega zmanjšanja – 373 000 kW – je nastala v Evropski uniji petnajsterice.
The vast majority of the fishing capacity withdrawn – 373 000 kW – came from the Member States of the EU-15.
Zmanjšanje zmogljivosti z državno pomočjo v novih državah članicah je po 2. maju 2004 naraslo na 54 000 kW.
The fishing capacity withdrawn by the new Member States with public aid since 2 May 2004 stood at 54 000 kW.
Pomoč Skupnosti bi morala biti prilagojena potrebam razvoja ribiškega sektorja in zagotavljati tako trajnostno izkoriščanje ribjega staleža kot dolgoročno ohranjanje ribolovnih dejavnosti.
Community aid must be adapted to the changing needs in the fishing industry and thereby guarantee both the sustainable exploitation of fish stocks and the long-term preservation of fishing activities.
Poročevalec izraža zadovoljstvo zaradi namere Komisije, da zaradi potrebe po varnosti in higieni ter izboljšanju delovnih pogojev na krovu omogoči, čeprav v zelo omejenem obsegu, posodobitev ribiškega ladjevja.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s intention to provide possibilities – however limited – for modernising fishing vessels in the context of requirements relating to safety, hygiene and the improvement of working conditions on board.
Vendar meni, da je treba ponovno obravnavati odstotek, da bi tako omogočili dejansko posodobitev ladjevja za priobalni ribolov.
He nevertheless takes the view that the percentage should be revised in order to offer the coastal fishing fleet real possibilities for modernisation.
Kar zadeva spremembo člena 13, pa nasprotuje obveznemu zmanjšanju moči motorja za 20 % za plovila, ki so daljša od 12 metrov, ker to ogroža varnost plovila in posadke, obenem pa skorajda onemogoča nekatere načine ribarjenja, kar bo imelo gospodarske in socialne posledice za sektor.
With regard to the amendment to Article 13, he rejects the compulsory 20% reduction in power for vessels over 12 metres in length since this would jeopardise the safety of vessels and crews, whilst rendering certain fishing methods virtually impossible, which would have economic and social consequences for the industry.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/59/ES o vzpostavitvi sistema spremljanja in obveščanja za ladijski promet
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/59/EC establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system
MNENJE Odbora za ribištvo ........................................................................................35
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................36
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0589 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0589 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 80(2) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C6-0004/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 80(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0004/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ter mnenja Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0086/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0086/2007 ),
(5) Oprema, ki omogoča samodejno prepoznavanje ladij (AIS – Automatic Identification System), predvidena v Konvenciji SOLAS, omogoča ne samo izboljšanje možnosti spremljanja teh ladij, ampak predvsem izboljšanje njihove varnosti v primerih bližnje plovbe.
(5) The automatic ship identification systems (AIS – Automatic Identification System) referred to in the SOLAS Convention make it possible not only to improve the possibilities of monitoring these ships but above all to make them safer in close navigation situations.
Na podlagi tega je bila oprema vključena v določbe Direktive 2002/59/ES.
They have accordingly been integrated into the enacting terms of Directive 2002/59/EC.