natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija ne analizira in se ne uči iz izkušenj najuspešnejših vidikov kubanskega razvojnega sodelovanja, ki Kubi na področju zdravstvene oskrbe pomagajo pridobivati vedno večji ugled pri sosednjih državah, pa tudi širše.
The Commission fails to analyse and learn from those particularly successful Cuban development cooperation strategies which, in the field of medical care for example, have made Cuba increasingly respected among its neighbours and further afield as well.
Evropski uniji, ki je sama odgovorna za razvoj odnosov do Kube, grozi, da ne bo uspešna pri spreminjanju političnega ozračja v regiji, in bo zamudila priložnost za vzpostavitev konstruktivnega dialoga o kontroverznih temah, kot so uresničevanje političnih pravic posameznika, svoboda obveščanja in smrtna kazen.
Here the EU, which bears a responsibility of its own for the development of relations with Cuba, is in danger of failing to respond to the change in the political climate in the region and missing an opportunity to engage in a dialogue which could include a constructive debate on such controversial topics as individual political rights, freedom of information and the death penalty.
„Odprta vrata“ za politični dialog, ki jih opisuje Komisija, je treba načeloma pozdraviti, vendar ne zadostujejo, ker strogo zadevajo skupno stališče iz leta 1996 in pri tem omogočajo le še ukrepe v zvezi s humanitarno pomočjo.
The 'open door' for political dialogue to which the Commission refers is to be welcomed, but this is not enough, as it refers strictly to the Common Position of 1996 and thus only allows scope for humanitarian aid measures.
Oživitev sodelovanja in dialoga je s tega vidika boljša možnost.
A return to cooperation and dialogue is the better option in this context.
Dober primer je Kanada, ki svojo politiko do Kube že dolgo usmerja po načelih konstruktivnega vključevanja.
Canada, which has long since adopted a constructive engagement policy towards Cuba, could be taken as an example.
Začetek sodelovanja pri pomembnih nalogah za varstvo okolja pri razvojnem sodelovanju je treba posebno pozdraviti.
The launching of cooperation in important fields of environmental protection as part of development cooperation should be unreservedly welcomed.
Vendar je treba vključiti spoznanje, da se bosta število in moč naravnih nesreč zaradi globalnih podnebnih sprememb še povečala.
However, it should be added that we now know that, because of global climate change, an aggravation of the frequency and severity of meteorological disasters in the region can even be expected.
EU si mora pri tem prizadevati, da prizadeti regiji ne bo vedno znova le pomagala pri obnovi, ampak bo znatno zmanjšala lastne emisije.
The EU should therefore respond to the challenge not only by repeatedly helping a region where disaster has struck to reconstruct but by reducing its own emissions more.
Razen tega je potreben prenos tehnologije za zagotavljanje, da uspešen regionalni razvoj na Karibih ne povzroči tudi ustrezno večje obremenitve svetovnega podnebja z emisijami.
Moreover, technology transfer is needed, to ensure that successful regional development in the Caribbean does not at the same time lead to correspondingly increased emissions, to the detriment of the global climate.
Poleg tega v dokumentu Komisije manjka vidik posebne in svojevrstne grožnje otoškim državam karibske partnerske regije zaradi zviševanja gladine morja.
The Commission document also fails to mention the aspect of the special dangers - which are also of a special kind - facing the island States in the Caribbean partner region due to a rise in sea level.
Namera Evropske unije in njenih držav članic v zvezi z vrhom EU in latinskoameriških držav o „dajanju prednosti območju visokošolskega izobraževanja, ki obsega Evropo, Latinsko Ameriko in Karibe,“ je pomembna in obetavna pobuda.
The plan by the European Union and its Member States, as a follow-up to the EU-LAC Summit, to 'prioritise the creation of a Common Higher Education Area between Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean' is an important and promising initiative.
Vseeno bo dosegel le omejen del karibske mladine.
However, it will reach only a limited proportion of Caribbean young people.
Ker je 60 % prebivalstva v regiji mlajšega od 30 let, je treba skupno razvojno sodelovanje veliko bolj usmeriti k njim in izkoristiti potencial velikega števila mladih v regiji.
As 60% of the region's population is aged under 30, the whole of development cooperation should be aimed far more at this generation and provide opportunities for the many young people in the region.
V nasprotnem primeru lahko nezadovoljstvo zaradi stalne revščine in pomanjkanja perspektive ogrozi socialno kohezijo.
Otherwise, frustration due to persistent poverty and non-existent prospects may endanger social cohesion.
Brezposelnost mladih v strategiji Komisije žal ni obravnavana.
Regrettably, however, the Commission strategy does not mention youth unemployment.
Trajnostni turizem
Sustainable tourism
Komisija upravičeno ugotavlja, da pokrajinska lepota spada med največje bogastvo regije in da ima vzpostavitev trajnostnega turizma velik potencial.
The Commission rightly observes that the beauty of the region's landscapes is among its greatest assets and that expanding sustainable tourism is a genuine option.
Ta trajnost pa ne zadeva le okolja.
Its sustainability must not be confined to the environment, however.
Turistični sektor, v katerem le veliki tuji vlagatelji in hotelske verige gradijo in upravljajo hotele ter dobiček usmerijo v tujino, ne prispeva k trajnosti.
A tourism industry in which only large external investors and hotel chains build and operate and the profits are correspondingly exported cannot be regarded as sustainable.
Sektor domače prebivalstvo degradira v družbo strežnikov.
It degrades the indigenous population to a society of servants.
Spodbude Evropske investicijske banke in drugih struktur morajo biti čim bolj usmerjene k vzpostavitvi domačega gostinskega in turističnega sektorja.
Subsidies from the European Investment Bank and other organisations should therefore be aimed much more clearly at developing a domestic restaurant and tourism industry.
Partnerstvo EU in Karibov za rast, stabilnost in razvoj
The EU-Caribbean partnership for growth, stability and development
o Skupnem stališču Sveta o sprejetju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3922/91 o uskladitvi tehničnih predpisov in upravnih postopkov na področju civilnega letalstva
on the Council common position with a view to adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 on the harmonisation of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (13376/1/2005 – C6‑0090/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (13376/1/2005 – C6‑0090/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave
– having regard to its positions at first reading
UL COM 262, 18.9.2001, str.
OJ C 262, 18.9.2001, p.
224 in UL C 272 E, 13.11.2003, str.
224 and OJ C 272 E, 13.11.2003, p.
103. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2000)0121 )
103. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2000)0121 )
UL C 311 E, 31.10.2000, str.
OJ C 311 E, 31.10.2000, p.
13. , in o spremenjenem predlogu ( KOM(2002)0030 )
13. and on the amended proposal ( COM(2002)0030 )
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije (KOM(2004) 0073)
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2004)0073 )
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za transport in turizem ( A6-0212/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0212/2006 ),
(6a) V nekaterih državah članicah so v veljavi kolektivne delovne pogodbe, sklenjene na osnovi pogajanj, ki zaradi večje varnosti zračnega prometa vsebujejo strožje določbe glede omejitev časa letenja in delovnega časa.
(6a) In some Member States there are negotiated collective labour agreements which, in the interests of air safety, lay down more stringent provisions regarding flight and duty time limitations.
Pomembno je ohraniti možnost, da ostanejo ti sporazumi veljavni in da se zagotovi njihova združljivost s to uredbo.
It is important to safeguard the possibility of keeping such agreements in force and to ensure that they are compatible with the present Regulation.
Uredba ne sme povzročiti zniževanja standardov zračne varnosti, kadar taki sporazumi obstajajo.
This Regulation should not lead to a lowering of air safety standards where such agreements exist.
Zaradi novega zakonodajnega predloga se ne sme zmanjšati letalska varnost v državah članicah, kjer imajo že zdaj visoke standarde, ne glede na to, ali so standardi določeni z zakonodajo ali so bili doseženi s pogajanji v okviru kolektivne pogodbe.
A new legislative proposal must not lead to aviation safety being lowered in the Member States which already have high standards, irrespective of whether they are laid down in legislation or negotiated in a collective agreement.
(12) V treh letih po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe bi bilo treba opraviti znanstveno in zdravstveno oceno predpisov o omejitvi letalskega delovnega časa in delovnega časa ter o zahtevanem počitku in, če je primerno, predpisov za kabinsko osebje.
(12) A scientific and medical evaluation of the provisions on flight and duty time limitations and rest requirements and, as appropriate, of the provisions on cabin crews should be made within a period of three years following the entry into force of this Regulation.
(12) V dveh letih po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe bi bilo treba opraviti znanstveno in zdravstveno oceno predpisov o omejitvi letalskega delovnega časa in delovnega časa ter o zahtevanem počitku in, če je primerno, predpisov za kabinsko osebje.
(12) A scientific and medical evaluation of the provisions on flight and duty time limitations and rest requirements and, as appropriate, of the provisions on cabin crews should be made within a period of two years following the entry into force of this Regulation.
Znanstveno tehnične ocene morajo biti opravljene kar se da hitro, da se prepreči slabosti in pomanjkljivosti.
The scientific technical evaluation needs to be made as soon as possible so as to avert imperfections and shortcomings.
Poleg tega je treba v poddel Q vključiti vsa znanstvena spoznanja.
The full body of scientific evidence should also be incorporated in Subpart Q.
(14a) Namen uredbe je zagotoviti usklajene in najvišje varnostne standarde.
(14a) The aim of this Regulation is to provide harmonised safety standards of the highest level.
Nekatere države članice zagotavljajo take varnostne standarde bodisi z zakonodajo bodisi v okviru kolektivnih delovnih pogodb.
Several Member States provide such safety standards through legislation or within the framework of collective labour agreements.
Po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe določbe iz poddela Q Priloge III v nobenem primeru ne smejo predstavljati veljavne podlage za zniževanje sedanje ravni varnosti v državah članicah.
Under no circumstances should the provisions of Annex III Subpart Q constitute valid grounds for reducing the levels of safety protection existing in the Member States when this Regulation enters into force.
Zaščitna klavzula je nujno potrebna, če hočemo preprečiti, da bi te države članice uporabljale poddel Q kot opravičilo za nižanje obstoječih varnostnih standardov.
A safeguard clause is necessary to prevent Subpart Q from being used as an excuse in these Member States to lower existing safety standards.
Nekatere države članice takšno stopnjo varnosti že zagotavljajo z zakonodajo in/ali s kolektivnimi pogodbami.
Several Member States provide such safety levels through legislation and/or within the framework of collective labour agreements.
Po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe določbe iz poddelov prilog v nobenem primeru ne smejo predstavljati veljavne podlage za zniževanje sedanje ravni varnosti v državah članicah.
Under no circumstances should the provisions of the Subparts of the Annexes constitute valid grounds for reducing the levels of safety protection existing in the Member States when this Regulation enters into force.
Uvodna izjava 9 a (novo) (Uredba (EEC) št. 3922/91
Recital 9 a (new) (Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91
-1a) Po uvodni izjavi 9 je treba vstaviti naslednjo izjavo:
-1a) The following recital shall be inserted after recital 9:
"(9a) ker uporaba določb o omejitvah časa letenja in delovnega časa lahko povzroči znatne motnje v urnikih podjetij, ki delujejo izključno v nočnem času; ker bi morala Komisija na osnovi dokazov, ki jih zagotovijo zainteresirane strani, izvesti oceno in predlagati spremembo določb glede omejitve časa letenja in delovnega časa, da bi se upošteval ta poseben način delovanja;"
"(9a) Whereas the application of provisions regarding flight and duty time limitations can result in significant disruption of rosters for undertakings the operating models of which are exclusively based on night-time operation;and whereas the Commission should, on the basis of evidence to be provided by the parties concerned, carry out an assessment and propose amendment of the provisions regarding flight and duty time limitations to take account of these special operating models";
Motnje v urnikih imajo pogosto negativne posledice na raven varnosti pri načinu delovanja ponudnikov ekspresnih nočnih prevozov tovora.
Disruptions to rosters often have a negative impact on the level of safety of operating models of express overnight cargo service providers.
Gre za primere, ko sestava urnikov zaradi omejevanja nočno/dnevne izmene temelji na navajenosti osebja na nočni delovni čas.
This is the case where the roster system is based on staff becoming accustomed to nightshifts by limiting the number of dayshift/nightshift changes.
Ta uvodna izjava naj popravi napako, ki je bila storjena, ko so bile storitve ekspresnih nočnih prevozov tovora in ponudniki storitev izvzete iz prvotnega predloga Komisije in iz poročila Evropskega parlamenta ob prvi obravnavi.
This recital is intended to remedy the fact that express overnight cargo services and service- providers were omitted from the original Commission proposal and the European Parliament report at first reading.
Uvodna izjava 10 a (novo) (Uredba (EEC) št. 3922/91)
Recital 10 a (new) (Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91)
-1b) Po uvodni izjavi 10 je treba vstaviti naslednjo izjavo:
-1b) The following recital shall be inserted after recital 10:
"(10a) Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu do …* dokonča strokovno in zdravstveno oceno poddelov O in Q Priloge III.
"(10a) By … * the European Aviation Safety Agency should complete a scientific and medical evaluation of Subparts Q and O of Annex III.
Komisija v skladu s postopkom, navedenim v tej Uredbi, v sodelovanju z Evropsko agencijo za varnost v letalstvu nemudoma sestavi in predloži predloge za spremembo ustreznih tehničnih določb glede omejitev časa letenja in delovnega časa ter časa počitka;*
In accordance with the procedure referred to in this Regulation, the Commission should draw up and submit proposals without delay, in close cooperation with the European Aviation Safety Agency, to amend the relevant technical provisions relating to flight and duty time limitations and rest periods;
* Dve leti od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
* Two years after the date of entry into force of this regulation";
Uvodna izjava 10 b (novo) (Uredba (EEC) št. 3922/91)
Recital 10 b (new) (Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91)
-1c) Po uvodni izjavi 10 je treba vstaviti naslednjo izjavo:
-1c) The following recital shall be inserted after recital 10:
"(10b) ker je pri oceni nekaterih določb, navedenih v členu 8a, treba ohraniti usmeritev k usklajevanju usposabljanja kabinskega osebja, da se omogoči vzajemno priznanje poklicne izobrazbe po vsej Skupnosti, in ker je treba v tej zvezi nadaljevati s preučevanjem možnosti licenciranja kabinskega osebja;"
"(10b) Whereas in the evaluation of certain provisions referred to under Article 8a, the course towards harmonisation of cabin crew training hitherto adopted should be maintained, in order to allow for mutual recognition of training qualifications throughout the Community and whereas, in this connection, the option of cabin crew licensing should be investigated further;";
Usklajevanje usposabljanja kabinskega osebja je namenjeno uvedbi enotnih, visokih standardov.
The Harmonisation of cabin crew training serves to create uniform, high European standards.
Z vzajemnim priznanjem poklicne izobrazbe in možnostjo licenciranja kabinskega osebja bi se upošteval cilj evropskega trga dela za kabinsko osebje.
Mutual recognition of training qualifications and the option of licensing cabin crew would serve to take account of the objective of a European labour market for cabin crew.
Člen 8 a, odstavek 1 (Uredba (EEC) št. 3922/91)
Article 8 a, paragraph 1 (Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91)
(1) Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu do…. + zaključi znanstveno in zdravstveno oceno določb poddela Q Priloge III in, če je ustrezno , poddela O Priloge III.
(1) By... + the European Aviation Safety Agency shall conclude a scientific and medical evaluation of the provisions of Subpart Q and , as appropriate, of Subpart O of Annex III.
(1) Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu do…. + zaključi znanstveno in zdravstveno oceno določb poddela Q Priloge III in poddela O Priloge III.
(1) By... + the European Aviation Safety Agency shall conclude a scientific and medical evaluation of the provisions of Subpart Q and Subpart O of Annex III.
+ tri leta od dneva začetka veljavnosti te uredbe
+ three years following the date of entry into force of this Regulation .
+ dve leti od dneva začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
+ two years following the date of entry into force of this Regulation .
Člen 8 a, odstavek 2 (Uredba (EEC) št. 3922/91)
Article 8 a, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91)
Brez poseganja v člen 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. julija 2002 o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu* Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu pomaga Komisiji pri pripravi predlogov za spremembo veljavnih tehničnih predpisov iz poddela Q Priloge III.
Without prejudice to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, the European Aviation Safety Agency shall assist the Commission in the preparation of proposals for the modification of the applicable technical provisions of Subpart Q of Annex III.
Brez poseganja v člen 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. julija 2002 o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu* Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu pomaga Komisiji pri pripravi predlogov za spremembo veljavnih tehničnih predpisov iz poddela Q Priloge III in pripravi priporočila najkasneje šest mesecev po predložitvi ugotovitev znanstvene in zdravstvene ocene, omenjene v odstavku 1.
Without prejudice to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, the European Aviation Safety Agency shall assist the Commission in the preparation of proposals for the modification of the applicable technical provisions of Subpart Q of Annex III and shall make recommendations within not more than six months of submitting the findings of the scientific and medical evaluation referred to in paragraph 1.
Komisija sprejme predloge, ki vključujejo ta priporočila.
The Commission shall adopt proposals incorporating those recommendations.
Prav je, da je pooblastilo za pripravo ocene dobila Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu, saj gre za organ, ki bi bil s tehničnega vidika zmožen začeti z oceno pred koncem leta 2006.
It is right that the European Aviation Safety Agency should be the body instructed to carry out the evaluation, given that it would be technically capable of starting it before the end of 2006.
Tako bi se skrajšalo obdobje, ko se je treba zadovoljiti z neustrezno minimalno varnostno ureditvijo.
The need to make do with the present inadequate minimum safety arrangements would consequently be shortened in time.
Študija bi morala biti torej pripravljena najkasneje v dveh letih po začetku veljavnosti uredbe.
The study should therefore be drawn up within at most two years of the entry into force of the regulation.
Predlog spremembe, ki ga vlaga Luis de Grandes Pascual
Amendment by Luis de Grandes Pascual
Priloga III, poddel Q, točka 2.1 (b)
Annex III, Subpart Q, point 2.1, (b)
(b) vsemi dodatnimi določbami, ki jih uporablja Organ v skladu z določbami iz tega poddela za zagotavljanje varnosti.
(b) any additional provisions that are applied by the Authority in accordance with the provisions of this Subpart for the purpose of maintaining safety.
(b) vsemi dodatnimi določbami, ki jih uporablja Organ v skladu z določbami iz tega poddela za zagotavljanje varnosti; določbe tega poddela ne predstavljajo pravne podlage, na osnovi katere bi bile države članice upravičene omiliti zakonodajo na področju varnosti v letalstvu.
(b) any additional provisions that are applied by the Authority in accordance with the provisions of this Subpart for the purpose of maintaining safety ; the provisions of this Subpart shall not constitute a legal basis entitling Member States to relax aviation safety legislation .
Uskladitev, predlagana v poddelu Q, je na nižji stopnji kot veljavni varnostni standardi v nekaterih državah članicah z naprednejšo zakonodajo.
The harmonisation proposed in Subpart Q as it stands is at a level below the safety standards in force in some Member States with more advanced legislation.
POTEK POSTOPKA DO SEDAJ
PROCEDURE TO DATE
Komisija je 24. marca 2000 sprejela predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3922/91 o uskladitvi tehničnih predpisov in upravnih postopkov na področju civilnega letalstva.
On 24 March 2000, the Commission presented a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 on the harmonisation of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation.
Namen predloga je vzpostavitev tehničnih predpisov, veljavnih po vsej Skupnosti, in uskladitev pravil za uporabo zrakoplovov v komercialnem zračnem prometu.
The aim of the proposal is to establish technical provisions applicable throughout the Community and to harmonise provisions on the operation of aircraft engaged in commercial air transportation.
Evropski parlament je svojo prvo obravnavo zaključil 18. januarja 2001.
Parliament concluded its first reading on 18 January 2001.
Komisija je nato 4. februarja 2002 predložila predelan predlog, ki je vključeval večino sprememb Parlamenta, vključno z zahtevanim novim poddelom Q.
The Commission subsequently presented a revised proposal on 4 February 2002 incorporating most of Parliament's amendments, including a new Subpart Q as called for.
Skupno stališče je bilo dokončno sprejeto 9. marca 2006, pri čemer so bile spremembe Parlamenta iz obeh prvih obravnav večidel upoštevane.
On 10 December 2004, the Council reached a partial political agreement and the Common Position was finally adopted on 9 March 2006, incorporating Parliament's amendments from both first readings for the most part.
Po šest let trajajočem zakonodajnem postopku bodo s to revizijo Uredbe št. 3922/91 končno številni tehnični varnostni predpisi določeni na evropski ravni.
After a legislative process lasting 6 years, the present revision of Regulation No 3922/91 finally establishes numerous technical provisions regarding safety at a European level.