natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Primeri, ko je število dovoljenj omejeno iz drugih razlogov, kot je pomanjkljivost naravnih virov ali tehničnih zmogljivosti, ostajajo vsekakor podvrženi upoštevanju ostalih določb v zvezi s sistemom dovoljenj, ki ga določa ta direktiva.
Cases where the number of authorisations is limited for reasons other than scarcity of natural resources or technical capacity remain in any case subject to the other provisions of this Directive relating to authorisation schemes.
(28) V primerih, ko je število razpoložljivih dovoljenj za dejavnost omejeno zaradi omejenosti naravnih virov ali tehničnih zmogljivosti, kot je lahko na primer izkoriščanje hidroelektrarne, je treba sprejeti postopek izbora med več potencialnimi kandidati s ciljem, da se z javnim natečajem razvije kakovost in pogoji za opravljanje storitev, ki so na voljo uporabnikom.
(28) In cases where the number of authorisations available for an activity is limited because of scarcity of natural resources or technical capacity, as may be the position, for example, with regard to the exploitation of hydro-electric plant, a procedure for selection from among several potential candidates must be adopted, with the aim of developing through open competition the quality and conditions for supply of services available to users.
Poleg tega država članica ne more dajati nobene prednosti ponudnikom, ki imajo posebno nacionalno ali socialno-ekonomsko povezavo; niti jih ne more omejevati na podlagi sedeža, pridobivanja svobode ponudnika, izkoriščanja ali razpolaganja s pravicami in blagom ali dostopom do različnih vrst posojil ali namestitve, dokler te možnosti služijo dostopu do njihove dejavnosti ali njenega učinkovitega izvajanja.
Moreover, a Member State may not confer any advantages on providers having a particular national or local socio-economic link; nor may it restrict, on grounds of place of establishment, the provider’s freedom to acquire, exploit or dispose of rights and goods or to access different forms of credit or accommodation in so far as those choices are useful for access to his activity or for the effective exercise thereof.
To ne sme vplivati na obveznost zagotavljanja redne nujne oskrbe, ob upoštevanju, da je to v skladu s pravom Skupnosti.
The obligation to provide a regular emergency service should be unaffected by this provided that it accords with other Community law.
(32) Prepoved ekonomskih preizkusov kot predpogoja za izdajo dovoljenja zajema same ekonomske preizkuse, ne pa tudi zahtev, ki jih objektivno utemeljujejo pomembni razlogi, povezani z javnim interesom, kot je varovanje mestnega okolja , socialne politike in ciljev javnega zdravja .
(32) The prohibition of economic tests as a prerequisite for the grant of authorisation covers economic tests as such, but not requirements which are objectively justified by overriding reasons relating to the public interest, such as protection of the urban environment, social policy and public health objectives.
(32a) Prepoved neposredne in posredne vpletenosti konkurenčnih udeležencev z osebnimi motivi za dejavnost pri izdaji dovoljenj ne velja za posvetovanja z organizacijami, kot so gospodarske zbornice ali socialni partnerji, o zadevah, ki niso posamezne prošnje za dovoljenje.
(32a) The prohibition of direct or indirect involvement of competing operators having personal motivations for action in the granting of authorisations should not concern the consultation of organisations such as chambers of commerce or social partners on matters other than individual applications for authorisations.
Nič od tega ne sme onemogočiti posvetovanja trgovinskih organizacij, katerih člani so predstavniki konkurentov, če rezultat danega posvetovanja ni odločilen za dovoljenje ali drugo odločitev o posamezni prijavi.
Neither should it preclude the consultation of trade organisations whose members include representatives of competitors provided that the outcome of a given consultation is not determinative of an authorisation or other decision on an individual application.
Uvodna izjava 32 b (novo)
Recital 32 b (new)
(32b) Preklic obveznosti za zagotovitev ali sodelovanje pri finančni garanciji ali sklenitev zavarovanja ne sme vplivati na možnost držav članic, da zahtevajo finančno garancijo ali zavarovanje, in ne sme vplivati na zahteve v zvezi s sodelovanjem v skupnem odškodninskem skladu, na primer za člane poklicnih teles ali organizacij.
(32b) The lifting of the obligation to provide or participate in a financial guarantee or to take out insurance should not affect the possibility for Member States to require financial guarantees or insurance nor should it affect requirements relating to the participation in a collective compensation fund, for instance for members of professional bodies or organisations.
Niti ne sme vplivati na možnost držav članic, da od ponudnikov storitev zahtevajo sodelovanje pri finančni garanciji za socialni sklad, povezan s sektorjem, ki je namenjen varovanju delavcev pred plačilno nesposobnostjo delodajalcev.
Neither should it affect the possibility for Member States to require service providers to participate in a financial guarantee to a sector-related social fund which intends to protect workers against the insolvency of their employers.
(33) Za usklajevanje modernizacije predpisov na način, ki bo skladen z zahtevami notranjega trga, je treba oceniti določene nediskriminacijske nacionalne zahteve, ki bi lahko po svoji naravi resno omejile ali celo preprečile dostop do dejavnosti ali njenega izvajanja ob svobodi ustanavljanja.
(33) In order to coordinate the modernisation of national rules and regulations in a manner consistent with the requirements of the internal market, it is necessary to evaluate certain non-discriminatory national requirements which, by their very nature, could severely restrict or even prevent access to an activity or the exercise thereof under the freedom of establishment.
Države članice morajo v obdobju prenosa te direktive zavarovati potrebnost in sorazmernost teh zahtev ter jih po potrebi odpraviti ali spremeniti.
Member States must ensure, during the transposition period of this Directive, that such requirements are necessary and proportionate and, where appropriate, they must abolish or amend them.
Poleg tega morajo te zahteve biti v vsakem primeru skladne s konkurenčnim pravom Skupnosti.
Moreover, those requirements must in any case be compatible with Community competition law.
Ta postopek ocenjevanja je omejen na usklajenost teh zahtev z že oblikovanimi merili Sodišča o svobodi ustanavljanja.
This evaluation process should be limited to the compatibility of these requirements with the criteria already established by the Court of Justice on the freedom of establishment.
Ne sme se sklicevati na uporabo konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti.
It should not concern the application of Community competition law.
Če so takšne zahteve diskriminatorne ali niso objektivno utemeljene s pomembnim razlogom v zvezi z javnim interesom ali če so nesorazmerne, jih je treba odpraviti ali spremeniti.
Where such requirements are discriminatory or not objectively justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest or where they are disproportionate, they should be abolished or amended.
Rezultat ocenjevanja bo različen glede na naravo dejavnosti in zadevnega javnega interesa.
The outcome of the assessment will be different according to the nature of the activities and the public interest concerned.
Po sodni praksi Sodišča so lahko zlasti takšne zahteve popolnoma upravičene, ko izpolnjujejo cilje javnega zdravja ali socialne politike.
In particular, according to the case-law of the Court of Justice, such requirements could be fully justified when they pursue public health or social policy objectives.
Postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja, predviden v tej direktivi, ne sme vplivati na svobodo držav članic, da v zakonodaji zagotovijo višjo raven varovanja javnih interesov, še zlasti za doseganje ciljev zdravstvene in socialne politike.
The mutual evaluation process provided for in this Directive should not affect the freedom of Member States to provide in their legislation for a high level of protection of public interests, in particular with the aim to achieve health and social policy objectives.
Ne sme se sklicevati na uporabo konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti.
It does not concern the application of Community competition law.
(35) Primerno je, da določbe te direktive o svobodi ustanavljanja veljajo le v tolikšni meri, kolikor so zadevne dejavnosti odprte za konkurenco, tako da ne obvezujejo držav članic, da odpravijo obstoječe monopole, še posebej loterij, ali da privatizirajo določene sektorje .
(35) It is appropriate that the provisions of this Directive concerning freedom of establishment should apply only to the extent that the activities in question are open to competition, so that they do not oblige Member States to abolish existing monopolies, notably those of lotteries , or to privatise certain sectors .
(35) Primerno je, da določbe te direktive o svobodi ustanavljanja veljajo le v tolikšni meri, kolikor so zadevne dejavnosti odprte za konkurenco, tako da ne obvezujejo držav članic, da liberalizirajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega interesa, privatizirajo javne subjekte ali odpravijo obstoječe monopole v drugih dejavnostih , še posebej loterijah , in da privatizirajo določene storitve distribucije .
(35) It is appropriate that the provisions of this Directive concerning freedom of establishment should apply only to the extent that the activities in question are open to competition, so that they do not oblige Member States to liberalise services of general economic interest nor to privatise public entities providing such services nor to abolish existing monopolies for other activities , notably those of lotteries or certain distribution services .
To načelo je bistveno, da se ponudnikom, posebej malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, zagotovi, da s popolno pravno varnostjo izkoristijo priložnosti, ki jih ponuja notranji trg.
That principle is essential in order to enable providers, especially SMEs, to avail themselves with full legal certainty of the opportunities offered by the internal market.
Z omogočanjem prostega pretoka storitev med državami članicami, to načelo skupaj z usklajevanjem in ukrepi medsebojne pomoči, omogoča tudi, da prejemniki pridobijo dostop do večje izbire visokokakovostnih storitev drugih držav članic.
By thus facilitating the free movement of services between Member States, that principle, together with harmonisation and mutual assistance measures, also enables recipients to gain access to a wider choice of high quality services from other Member States.
Načelo bi moralo biti dopolnjeno z mehanizmom pomoči, ki prejemniku zlasti omogoča, da je obveščen o zakonih drugih držav članic, in z usklajevanjem predpisov o preglednosti storitvenih dejavnosti.
That principle should be complemented by an assistance mechanism enabling the recipient, in particular, to be informed about the laws of the other Member States, and by the harmonisation of rules on the transparency of service activities.
Uvodna izjava 37 a (novo)
Recital 37 a (new)
(37a) Bistveno je, da je odstranjevanje ovir prostega pretoka storitev sočasno z usklajevanjem zakonodaje držav članic.
(37a) It is essential that the elimination of obstacles to the free movement of services goes hand in hand with coordination of the law of the Member States.
Zaradi razlogov na področjih, ki jih usklajuje ta direktiva, morajo države članice zagotoviti svobodo opravljanja storitev in ne smejo omejiti dostopa ter izvajanja dejavnosti storitev ponudnika, ki ima sedež v drugi državi članici.
For reasons falling within the fields coordinated by this Directive, Member States should ensure freedom to provide services and should not restrict the access to and the exercise of a service activity by a provider established in another Member State .
Področja, ki jih usklajuje ta direktiva, se povezujejo s podatki o ponudnikih in njihovih storitvah, poklicni odgovornosti in garanciji, podatki o poprodajnih garancijah in reševanju sporov, kot je vključeno v člene 26 do 28 in 32.
The fields coordinated by this Directive relate to the information on providers and their services, professional insurance and guarantees, information on after-sales guarantees and settlement of disputes as included in Articles 26 to 28 and 32.
Če – in do te mere – področja usklajuje drugo sredstvo Skupnosti, med drugim prek vzpostavljanja zahtev v zvezi s preglednostjo in zahtev, ki preprečujejo nepošteno poslovno prakso, velja tudi načelo, da države članice ne smejo omejevati storitev iz drugih držav članic.
Provided that -and to the extent that- fields are coordinated by other Community instruments, inter alia through the introduction of transparency requirements and requirements preventing unfair commercial practices, the principle that Member States may not restrict services coming from another Member State should also apply.
Uvodna izjava 37 b (novo)
Recital 37 b (new)
(37b) Pristojni organi države članice, v katerih se storitev opravlja, so najprimernejši za zagotavljanje učinkovitosti in stalnosti nadzora ponudnikov ter zagotavljanje varovanja prejemnikov.
(37b) The competent authorities of the Member State in which the service is provided are best placed to ensure the effectiveness and continuity of supervision of the provider and to provide protection for recipients.
Ta sistem se lahko izboljša z usklajevanjem pravil o nadzoru in ustvarjanjem učinkovitega sistema upravnega sodelovanja med državami članicami, kjer se zagotavlja storitev, in državami članicami, kjer je storitev vzpostavljena.
This system can be improved by coordinating rules on supervision and by creating an effective system of administrative cooperation between the Member State where the service is provided and the Member State where the service provider is established.
Na podlagi tega in v skladu s členom 35 te direktive si morajo države članice medsebojno pomagati in vzpostaviti vse mogoče ukrepe za učinkovito sodelovanje, med drugim z oblikovanjem ene ali več stičnih točk, prek katerih lahko druge države članice ali Komisija zahtevajo podatke po elektronski poti.
On this basis, and in accordance with Article 35 of this Directive, Member States should give each other mutual assistance and should put in place all possible measures for effective cooperation, inter alia by designating one or more points of contact through which other Member States or the Commission can request information by electronic means.
Pristojni organi države članice izvora so najbolj primerni, da ponudnika storitev učinkovito in trajno nadzirajo ter pri tem ne zagotavljajo le varstva prejemnikov storitev iz svoje države, pač pa tudi tistih iz drugih držav članic.
The competent authorities of the country of origin are best placed to ensure the effectiveness and continuity of supervision of the provider and to provide protection for recipients not only in their own Member State but also elsewhere in the Community.
Določanje pristojnosti sodne oblasti ne sodi v področje uporabe te direktive, ampak v področje uporabe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah ali drugih instrumentov Skupnosti, kot je Direktiva 96/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 1996 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev.
Determination of judicial jurisdiction does not fall within the scope of this Directive but within that of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, or other Community instruments such as Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services.
Predlog spremembe 42
Amendment 42
(40) Treba je zagotoviti, da se od pravila o uporabi zakonodaje izvorne države lahko odstopa samo na področjih, za katere veljajo splošna ali prehodna odstopanja.
(40) It is necessary to provide that the rule that the law of the country of origin is to apply may be departed from only in the areas covered by derogations, general or transitional.
Ta odstopanja so nujna za upoštevanje ravni povezovanja notranjega trga ali določenih instrumentov Skupnosti, ki se nanašajo na storitve, na podlagi katerih za ponudnika velja zakonodaja, ki ni zakonodaja izvorne države članice.
Those derogations are necessary in order to take into account the level of integration of the internal market or certain Community instruments relating to services pursuant to which a provider is subject to the application of a law other than that of the Member State of origin.
Razen tega so lahko v določenih posameznih primerih in pod določenimi strogimi postopkovnimi in vsebinskimi pogoji izjemoma sprejeti ukrepi proti določenemu ponudniku.
Moreover, by way of exception, measures against a given provider may also be adopted in certain individual cases and under certain strict procedural and substantive conditions.
Za zagotovitev pravne varnosti, ki je bistvena za spodbujanje malih in srednje velikih podjetij za opravljanje storitev v drugih državah članicah, je treba ta odstopanja omejiti le na nujno potrebna.
In order to ensure the legal certainty which is essential in order to encourage SMEs to provide their services in other Member States, those derogations should be limited to what is strictly necessary.
Zlasti bi odstopanje moralo biti možno le zaradi razlogov, povezanih z varnostjo storitev, opravljanjem zdravstvenega poklica ali zadevami javnega reda, kot je varovanje mladoletnikov ter kolikor nacionalni prepisi na tem področju niso bili usklajeni.
In particular, derogation should be possible only for reasons related to the safety of services, exercise of a health profession or matters of public policy, such as the protection of minors, and to the extent that national provisions in this field have not been harmonised.
Poleg tega bi kakršno koli omejevanje pravice opravljanja storitev moralo biti dovoljeno izjemoma in le če je v skladu s temeljnimi pravicami in na podlagi sodne prakse Sodišča, tvorijo sestavni del splošnih načel zakonodaje, vsebovane v pravnem redu Skupnosti.
In addition, any restriction of the freedom to provide services should be permitted, by way of exception, only if it is consistent with fundamental rights which, as the Court of Justice has consistently held, form an integral part of the general principles of law enshrined in the Community legal order.
Treba je poudariti, da se izjeme na podlagi javnega reda, javne varnosti ali javnega zdravja, kakor je navedeno v členu 46 Pogodbe ES, lahko uveljavijo, da se upravičijo nacionalne uredbe, ki jih ponudniki storitev ne uporabljajo enako, ne glede na njihovo poreklo .
(40) It is necessary to point out that exceptions on grounds of public policy, public security, or public health, as referred to in Article 46 of the EC Treaty, may be invoked in order to justify national regulations that are not applicable equally to service providers irrespective of their origin.
Razen tega je sodna praksa Sodišča, ko so bile priznane nediskriminatorne omejitve, priznala pomembne razloge, ki se nanašajo na splošni interes, vključno s poklicnimi pravili za zaščito prejemnikov storitev, varstvom intelektualne lastnine, varstvom delavcev, varstvom potrošnikov, ohranjanjem nacionalne zgodovinske in kulturne dediščine, razvojem arheoloških, zgodovinskih in umetniških imetij ter najširšim možnim razširjanjem znanja o umetniški in kulturni dediščini države .
Moreover, when non-discriminatory restrictions have been imposed, the case law of the Court has recognised overriding reasons relating to the general interest, including professional rules to protect service recipients, protection of intellectual property, protection of workers, consumer protection, conservation of the national historic and artistic heritage, development of archaeological, historic, and artistic assets, and the widest possible dissemination of knowledge of a country’s artistic and cultural heritage.
Razen tega ta direktiva državam članicam ne preprečuje uporabe določb in pogojev zaposlovanja o zadevah, različnih od tistih v Direktivi 96/71/ES, v primeru določil javnega reda.
Moreover, this Directive should not prevent Member States from applying terms and conditions of employment on matters other than those enlisted in Directive 96/71/EC in the case of public policy provisions.
Vplivati ne sme tudi na pogoje zaposlovanja v primerih, ko je delavec, zaposlen za zagotavljanje čezmejne storitve, premeščen v državo članico, kjer se opravlja storitev.
It should neither affect the terms and conditions of employment in cases where the worker employed for the provision of a cross-border service is recruited in the Member State where the service is provided.
Uvodna izjava 43
Recital 43
(43) Načelo izvorne države ne sme veljati za posebne pogoje , ki jih je določila država članica, v katero se je preselil ponudnik, utemeljitev za to pa je neizogibno povezana s posebnostmi kraja, kjer se opravlja storitev in ki je potrebna za ohranjanje javnega reda, javne varnosti, javnega zdravja ali varstva okolja.
(43) The country of origin principle should not apply to specific requirements, laid down by the Member State to which a provider has moved, the rationale for which is inextricably linked to the particular characteristics of the place where the service is provided, and which must be fulfilled in order to maintain public policy, public safety, public health or the protection of the environment.
Takšne razmere bi bile na primer v primeru dovoljenj za prevzemanje ali uporabo javne avtoceste, zahtev za organizacijo javnih dogodkov ali zahtev za varnost na gradbiščih.
Such would be the position, for example, in the case of authorisations to occupy or use the public highway, requirements relating to the organisation of public events or requirements relating to the safety of building sites.
(43) Ta direktiva ne sme vplivati na veljavo posebnih pogojev , ki jih je določila država članica, v katero se je preselil ponudnik, utemeljitev za to pa je neizogibno povezana s posebnostmi kraja, kjer se opravlja storitev , posebnimi tveganji, povezanimi s storitvijo na mestu, kjer se storitev opravlja, ali z zdravjem in varnostjo na delovnem mestu in ki je potrebna za ohranjanje javnega reda, javne varnosti, javnega zdravja ali varstva okolja.
(43) This Directive should not affect the application of specific requirements, laid down by the Member State to which a provider has moved, the rationale for which is inextricably linked to the particular characteristics of the place where the service is provided, to the particular risk created by the service at the place where the service is provided or to health and safety at the work place and which must be fulfilled in order to maintain public policy, public safety, public health or the protection of the environment.
Takšne razmere bi bile na primer v primeru dovoljenj za prevzemanje ali uporabo javne avtoceste, zahtev za organizacijo javnih dogodkov ali zahtev za varnost na gradbiščih, vključno s predpisi o delovnem okolju ali varnosti delavcev, samozaposlenih oseb ali javnosti .
Such would be the position, for example, in the case of authorisations to occupy or use the public highway, requirements relating to the organisation of public events or requirements relating to the safety of building sites including rules on the working environment or the protection of workers, self-employed persons, or the public .
(53) Člen 22 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1408/71, ki zadeva dovoljenje za prevzem stroškov zdravstvene oskrbe v drugi državi članici, prispeva, kot je poudarilo Sodišče, k lajšanju prostega pretoka bolnikov in opravljanju čezmejnih zdravstvenih storitev.
(53) Article 22 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, which concerns authorisation for assuming the costs of health care provided in another Member State, contributes, as the Court of Justice has emphasised, to facilitating the free movement of patients and the provision of cross-border medical services.