natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nadaljnja gonilna sila so bile različne odločitve ZDA, zlasti o programu „visa waiver“ (VWP).
A further driving force had been provided by various US decisions, notably concerning the visa waiver programme (VWP).
ZDA so zahtevale, da vsaka država, ki namerava sodelovati pri VWP
The US required that not later than October 26, 2004, each country that is designated to participate in the VWP
Program VWP omogoča državljanom določenih držav potovanje v ZDA brez pridobivanja vizuma.
The VWP allows the citizens of certain countries to travel to the USA without having to obtain a visa.
Med drugim sodelujejo tudi „stare“ države članice EU (razen Grčije), od novih držav članic pa Slovenija. najkasneje do 26. oktobra 2004 potrdi, kot pogoj za namen ali za nadaljevanje tega namena, program za izdajanje nacionalnih strojno berljivih potnih listov, ki so zaščiteni in vključujejo biometrične elemente ter elemente za ugotavljanje pristnosti dokumentov in ki so v skladu z ustreznimi biometričnimi standardi in s standardi za prepoznavanje dokumentov, ki jih je določila Mednarodna organizacija civilnega letalstva.“
Participating are among others the "old" EU Member States (except Greece) and Slovenia from the new Member States. "shall certify, as a condition for designation or continuation of that designation, that it has a program to issue to its nationals machine-readable passports that are tamper-resistant and incorporate biometric and document authentication identifiers that comply with applicable biometric and document identifying standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organisation."
Odkar je postalo očitno, da ne bo mogla nobena država izpolniti roka, je predsednik Bush podpisal zakon
Since it became evident that no country would be able to meet the deadline, President Bush signed a law
H.R. 4417 z dne 9. avgusta 2004. , ki podaljšuje rok za eno leto.
H.R. 4417 of 9 August 2004. to extend it by one year.
Na evropski ravni so sklepi Evropskega sveta spodbudili Komisijo, da pripravi predlog o uvedbi biometričnih elementov za prepoznavanje.
At European level, impetus came from European Council's conclusions which urged the Commission to make proposals concerning the introduction of biometric identifiers.
Evropski svet iz Soluna je dne 19. in 20. junija 2003 potrdil da „je v EU potreben skladen pristop v zvezi z biometričnimi elementi za prepoznavanje ali biometričnimi podatki, ki bi pripeljal do usklajenih rešitev za dokumente državljanov iz tretjih držav, za potne liste državljanov EU in informacijske sisteme (VIS in SIS II)“.
The Thessaloniki European Council of 19/20 June 2003 confirmed that “a coherent approach is needed in the EU on biometric identifiers or biometric data which would result in harmonised solutions for documents for third country nationals, EU citizens’ passports and information systems (VIS and SIS II)”.
Ta pristop je bil potrjen na več zasedanjih Evropskega sveta, na primer na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 16. in 17. oktobra 2003: „Z zadovoljstvom opažamo priprave v Uniji in v mednarodnih organih (ICAO, G8) pri uvajanju biometričnih elementov za prepoznavanje v vizumih, dovoljenjih za bivanje in v potnih listih.“
This approach has been confirmed by various European Councils, such as the 16-17 October 2003 Brussels European Council: "Notes with satisfaction the work under way within the Union and in international bodies (ICAO, G8) on the introduction of biometric identifiers in visas, residence permits and passports."
Trenutni predlog
The present proposal
Trenutni predlog želi potne liste narediti varnejše z uvajanjem zakonsko obvezujočih harmoniziranih varnostnih elementov za potne liste državljanov EU in z uvajanjem biometričnih elementov za prepoznavanje v potne liste.
The present proposal aims to render passports more secure by introducing legally binding harmonised security features for EU citizens' passports and by introducing biometric identifiers into the passport.
V nasprotju s predlogom Komisije o vizumih in dovoljenjih za bivanje se predlaga, da je obvezen samo en biometrični element za prepoznavanje – obrazna slika.
Contrary to the Commission proposals on visas and residence permits it is proposed that only one biometric identifier - the facial image - should be obligatory.
Države članice imajo možnost, da vključijo v potne liste tudi prstne odtise.
Member States are given the option of including fingerprints.
O natančnih tehničnih specifikacijah odloča komitologija z uporabo regulativnega postopka.
Detailed technical specifications are to be decided by comitology using the regulatory procedure.
V skladu s predlogom Komisije bodo morale države članice uporabiti predpis eno leto po sprejemu teh specifikacij.
According to the Commission's proposal, Member States will have to apply the regulation one year after these specifications are adopted.
Komisija v obrazložitvenem memorandumu predlaga, da se v zvezi z dolgoročno perspektivo ustvari osrednji register potnih listov Evrope.
In the explanatory memorandum the Commission suggests that in a long-term perspective a central European passport register could be created.
Stališče poročevalca
Rapporteur's view
Poročevalec se na splošno strinja s predlogom Komisije.
The rapporteur is in general in favour of the Commission proposal.
Meni, da bo biometrija pomagala pri izboljšanju varnosti dokumentov.
He considers that in fact biometrics will help to make our documents more secure.
Uvedba biometričnih elementov za prepoznavanje bo ponarejanje potnih listov močno otežila, ker bo biometrija zagotovila, da je oseba, ki se identificira s potnim listom, v resnici oseba, ki ji je bil izdan potni list.
The introduction of a biometric identifier will make it very difficult to falsify passports because the biometric will ensure that a person presenting a passport is in fact the one to whom it was originally issued.
Ker se potni listi uporabljajo tudi v vsakdanjem življenju in ne samo pri prestopu mej, zagotavlja biometrija rešitev proti kraji identitete.
In addition, since passports are also used in everyday life and not only at the crossing of borders, biometrics provides a solution for the problem of identity theft.
Poročevalec istočasno meni, da se morajo v zvezi zakonodajnimi akti tehnične specifikacije (ki imajo gospodarne in varne rešitve za zbiranje, obdelovanje, shranjevanje in uporabo biometričnih podatkov) in izvajanje v državah članicah ter nekaj zahtev o zaščiti pravic državljanov izpolniti pred izdajo biometričnih potnih listov.
At the same time he is of the opinion that as regards the legislative act, the technical specifications (containing cost-effective and secure solutions relating to the collection, processing, storage and use of biometric data) and implementation by the Member States, several requirements protecting citizens' rights have to be met before biometric passports are issued.
Uporaba biometrije je občutljiva z vidika zaščite podatkov.
The use of biometrics is very sensitive from a data-protection point of view.
Ni dvoma, da poročevalec podpira predloge za spremembe, ki so bili predstavljeni v nedavnem pismu predsednika iz člena 29 Delovne skupine (DS).
It is without question that the rapporteur supports the suggestions for amendments as presented in a recent letter from the chairman of the Article 29 Working Party (WP).
Pismo Petra Schaara z dne 18.8.2004 predsedniku Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, Jean-Louisu Bourlangesu.
Letter of Peter Schaar of 18/08/04 to the chairman of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Jean-Louis Bourlanges.
Vsi potrebni zaščitni ukrepi se morajo izvesti, da bi zagotovili popolno usklajenost z določbami o podatkih – direktiva o varstvu
All the necessary safeguards have to be in place in order to guarantee full compliance with the provisions of the data- protection directive
Direktiva 95/46/ES. .
Directive 95/46/EC. .
Kot je navedeno v splošnem delovnem dokumentu o biometriji iz člena 29 Delovne skupine
As stated in the general working document on biometrics which has been produced by the Article 29 WP
Delovni dokument o biometriji; 1.8.2003; DS (WP) 80. , „se morajo osebni podatki zbirati v določene, nedvoumne in zakonite namene in se ne smejo obdelovati na načine, ki niso v skladu s temi nameni.
Working document on biometrics; 01.08.2003; WP 80. , "personal data must be collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a way incompatible with those purposes.
Poleg tega morajo biti podatki v zvezi z nameni, za katere se ti podatki zbirajo in nadalje obdelujejo“ primerni, ustrezni in ne preveč obsežni“
In addition, personal data must be adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the purposes for which they are collected and further processed"
Stran 6. (namen in načelo proporcionalnosti; glej člen 6 Direktive).
Page 6. (purpose and proportionality principle; see Article 6 of the Directive).
Poročevalec pri prenašanju teh dveh temeljnih načel meni, da je treba namen uvajanja biometrije v pravnih besedilih navesti bolj podrobno in da se morajo uporabniki teh podatkov jasno identificirati.
In transposing these two fundamental principles the rapporteur is of the opinion that the purpose of introducing biometrics needs to be stated more specifically in the legal text and that the users of this data have to be clearly identified.
V zvezi z namenom uporabe teh podatkov mora biti popolnoma jasno, da se lahko podatki uporabljajo samo za preverjanje in pod nobenim pogojem za druge namene, zlasti ne za skrito nadzorovanje.
As regards the purpose for which the data will be used, it has to be made absolutely clear that the data can only be used for verification and under no circumstances for other purposes, in particular hidden surveillance.
Poročevalec je posebno zaskrbljen zaradi dolgoročne perspektive ustanavljanja evropskega registra za izdane potne liste, kot je omenjeno v obrazložitvenem memorandumu.
The rapporteur is particularly worried about the long-term perspective of the establishment of a European register for passports issued, as referred to in the explanatory memorandum.
Takšna osrednja baza podatkov za zagotavljanje „bolj zanesljive povezave med imetnikom in potnim listom.“ ni nujna.
Such a central database is not necessary for the purpose of ensuring "a more reliable link between the holder and the passport."
Poleg tega je tveganje „širše uporabe“ (uporaba podatkov za druge in ne za predvidene namene) preveliko.
Furthermore, the risk of "function creep" (the use of data for other purposes than originally envisaged) is too great.
Poročevalec državam članicam istočasno priporoča, da ne shranjujejo podatkov v državne baze podatkov.
At the same time the rapporteur urges Member States not to store the data in national databases.
Biometrični podatki naj bi bili shranjeni samo lokalno v potnem listu.
The biometric data should only be stored locally in the passport.
Uporaba te tehnologije bo istočasno povečala delo odgovornih organov za zaščito podatkov, kot poudarja Komisija v obrazložitvenem memorandumu.
At the same time, and as the Commission outlines in the explanatory memorandum, the use of this technology will increase the work of authorities responsible for data protection.
Poročevalec poziva države članice, da zagotovijo dovolj sredstev za izvajanje njihovih pravnih pooblastil v celoti.
The rapporteur calls on Member State to provide them with sufficient resources to enabe them to carry out their legal mandate to the full.
Bistvenega pomena je, da je na koncu izbrana stabilna tehnična rešitev, in sicer potem, ko je odbor za komitologijo izdelal tehnične specifikacije.
It is essential that the technical solution selected at the end, after the comitology committee has elaborated the technical specifications, should be sound.
Te specifikacije določajo, ali bo biometrija v potnih listih delovala ali ne, in zagotavljajo, da bodo podatki fizično zaščiteni.
It is these specifications that determine whether the idea of biometrics in passports will work or not and that ensure data will be physically protected.
Glej člen 17 Direktive o varstvu podatkov.
See Article 17 of the data protection directive.
Zato uvaja poročevalec spremembe predlogov, ki postavljajo nekatera dodatna merila za vodenje tehničnega izvajanja.
Therefore the rapporteur introduces amendments to the proposal which set some additional criteria which should guide the technical implementation.
Obstaja vrsta skrbi v zvezi z najmanj tremi vprašanji: najprej, vzpostavljena mora biti vzpostavljena ustrezna zaščita proti nepooblaščenemu dostopu, da bi zaščitili podatke državljanov.
There are a series of concerns regarding at least three issues: firstly, in order to protect citizens' data, appropriate protection against unauthorised access has to be in place.
Nekateri ugovarjajo, da se lahko čip prebere s precej večje razdalje, medtem ko drugi ugovarjajo, da se lahko čip v skladu s standardom ISO 14443 prebere samo z razdalje 10–15 cm.
Some argue that a chip can in fact be read from a relatively long distance, while others argue that a chip corresponding to the ISO norm 14443 can only be read in a distance of 10-15 cm.
Drugič, zagotoviti je treba dobro zaščito čipa proti naključni škodi, pa tudi to, da je „pričakovana življenjska doba“ takšna, kot jo imajo današnji potni listi (v večini primerov 10 let).
Secondly, it needs to be ensured that the chip is well protected against accidental damage and has a "life expectancy" like today's passports (in many cases 10 years).
Tretjič, zagotoviti je treba da čip, vstavljen v potnem listu, ne sovpada s čipi, vstavljenimi v vizumih, ki so dodani potnemu listu.
Thirdly, it has to be guaranteed that the chip embedded in the passport does not interfere with chips embedded into visas affixed into the passport.
Poročevalec bi rad v zvezi s tem poudaril, da morajo imeti tehnični strokovnjaki za iskanje pravilnih rešitev dovolj časa.
The rapporteur would like to stress in this connection that the technical experts must have the necessary time to find the right solutions.
Zahvaljujoč tehnološkemu napredku obstaja možnost, da bi bila uporaba čipov odvečna tako z vidika varnosti in vidika stroškov.
Thanks to technological progress there are even solutions which would make the use of chips superfluous from both the security and the cost point of view.
Ena rešitev je digitalni zapis fotografije in prstnega odtisa, skupaj s črtno kodo, ki vključuje kodiran digitalni podpis z javnim ključem.
Digital recording of the photograph and of the fingerprint, together with a bar code incorporating a digital signature encrypted by means of a public-key code, is one possible solution.
Nič ne bi pomagalo, če bi EU prenagljeno sprejemala rešitve, samo zato, da bi potem priznala, da ni bila dovolj dobro pripravljena ali da je bila rešitev predraga ali tehnološko zastarela.
It would be of no help if the EU rushed into a perceived solution only to acknowledge afterwards that it was not well enough prepared, or that the solution was too expensive or technologically obsolete.
Tak potek dejavnosti podcenjuje zaupanje državljanov.
Such a course of action would undermine citizens' trust.
Ker so tehnične specifikacije odločilne pri zaščiti podatkov, predlaga poročevalec, da bi morali imeti strokovnjaki, ki pregledujejo tehnične specifikacije s stališča zaščite podatkov, možnost sodelovanja pri razvijanju te zaščite.
Since the technical specifications are decisive for data protection the rapporteur proposes that experts viewing the technical specifications from a data-protection point of view should have the possibility of participating in the elaboration thereof.
Končno bi morali imeti možnost ocenjevanja tehničnih specifikacij z njihovega stališča in, če je potrebno, prositi, da se delo nadaljuje, tudi če težave ostanejo.
At the end they should have the possibility of evaluating the technical specifications from their perspective and of requesting, if necessary, that the work continue if any problems remain.
Poročevalec državam članicam poleg previdne priprave tehničnih specifikacij priporoča, da nadaljujejo s preverjanjem tehničnih rešitev v resničnih okoliščinah in predvsem pred izdajo potnih listov.
In addition to the careful preparation of the technical specifications the rapporteur urges Member States to continue to test technical solutions in a real-life environment and on a large scale before issuing the passports.
Ukrep bo hkrati povečal zaupanje v dokaj novo tehnologijo.
This measure would also increase confidence in what is a relatively new technology.
Navsezadnje bo za uspešno uvedbo biometrije strateškega pomena dejansko izvajanje te biometrije s strani držav članic.
In order for the introduction of biometrics to be a success the actual implementation by Member States will ultimately be of strategic importance.
Poročevalec bi rad poudaril, da bodo države članice odgovorne za pravočasno zagotavljanje izčrpnih informacij svojim državljanom in za zagotavljanje tega, da pridobi vpleteno osebje visokokakovostno izobrazbo na vseh stopnjah postopka (od vpoklica do nadzora).
The rapporteur would like to stress that they will be responsible for providing their citizens with comprehensive information in good time and for ensuring that staff involved in all stages of the process (from enrolment to control) receive high-quality training.
Nenazadnje mora biti neoporečnost nedolžnih državljanov v okolju „izključevanja napak“ zaščitena v vseh okoliščinah.
Ultimately, the integrity of innocent citizens in an atmosphere of "impossibility of error" has to be protected under all circumstances.
Morala bodo obstajati jamstva, kajti če se pojavi pri izvajanju pregleda pri prestopu mej napačna zavrnitev, mora biti zadevni državljan obveščen o razlogih za to zavrnitev in o načinih za pojasnilo in ureditev situacije v najkrajšem možnem času.
There will have to be guarantees to the effect that when border checks are carried out and a false rejection occurs, the citizens concerned will be informed of the reasons for such a rejection and of the means to be employed in order to clarify and rectify the situation as quickly as possible.
Za zaključek, poročevalec podpira uvajanje biometrije pod pogojem, da se vedno upoštevajo pravice in svoboda državljanov.
In conclusion, the rapporteur supports the introduction of biometrics, provided that citizens' rights and freedoms are always upheld.
MANJŠINSKO MNENJE
MINORITY OPINION
v skladu s členom 48(3) Poslovnika
pursuant to Rule 48(3) of the Rules of Procedure
Ole Krarup, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Mary Lou McDonald in Giusto Catania
tabled by Ole Krarup, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Mary Lou McDonald and Giusto Catania
Zamisel o vključitvi biometričnih identifikatorjev v osebne dokumente zavračamo iz več razlogov:
We reject the general idea of introducing biometric identifiers in identity documents for several reasons:
Prvič, močno smo zaskrbljeni zaradi velikega tveganja v zvezi z varstvom podatkov in zasebnostjo v bazah podatkov, ki bodo postale izredno obsežne.
Firstly, we are seriously concerned about huge risks to data protection and privacy in what will be extremely large databases.
Nadaljujejo se tudi težave z večkratnimi identitetami, prestrezanjem podatkov pri njihovem prenosu in učinkovitem delu policije.
Problems with multiple identities, interception of data transmissions and pro-active policing continue to exist.
Biometrični sistemi niso nikoli 100% točni, celo prstni odtisi pri več tisoč ljudeh v EU ne bodo natančni.
Biometric systems are never 100% accurate, even fingerprints will not be precise on several hundred thousand people in the EU.
Drugič, predlog krši vse splošne standarde primernosti in subsidiarnosti.
Secondly, the proposal violates all common standards of appropriateness and subsidiarity.
Do sedaj nista ne Svet ne Komisija zadovoljivo pojasnila potrebe, funkcionalnosti, učinkovitosti in verjetnih stranskih učinkov vključitve biometričnih elementov v osebne dokumente.
Until now, neither the Commission nor the Council have adequately explained the necessity, functionality, efficiency and probable side-effects of including biometric identifiers in identity documents.
Prav tako nista niti predstavila natančnejših podatkov o predvidenih stroških, niti predlagala podrobnejšega finančnega načrta!
They have not even provided detailed figures of the expected costs nor proposed a clear budget!
Biometrika ne povečuje varnosti, saj pri osebi ne ugotovi prave istovetnosti, temveč istovetnost, ki jo ustvari osebni dokument.
Finally, biometrics do not increase security, because they don't link a person to a real identity, only to an identity established by an identity document.
V primeru, da je potni list ponarejen, vanj vključeni biometrični identifikator tega ne spremeni.
If the passport is false, however, the biometric identifier included on it can't change this.
Storilci kaznivih dejanj se bodo v prihodnosti zato v vseh razpoložljivih bazah podatkov registrirali pod lažnimi identitetami in nepreverjeno prehajali skozi kontrole.
Future criminals will therefore register in all available databases under false identities and sail through coming controls unchecked, making the world less not more secure.
Predlog Komisije za uredbo Sveta o standardih za varnostne elemente in biometriko v potnih listih državljanov EU
Commission proposal for a Council regulation on standards for security features and biometrics in EU citizens' passports
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA..................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.................................5
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA................14
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION...............................14
MANJŠINSKO MNENJE........................................................................................................26
MINORITY OPINION.............................................................................................................26
o predlogu Komisije za uredbo Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 1683/95 o enotni obliki za vizume
on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1683/95 laying down a uniform format for visas
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2003)0558 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2003)0558 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 62(2)(b)(iii) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 62(2)(b)(iii) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 67 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0466/2003 ),
– having regard to Article 67 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0466/2003 ),
– ob upoštevanju Protokola o vključitvi schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir Evropske unije, na podlagi katerega se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom
– having regard to the Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0029/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0029/2004 ),
UVODNA IZJAVA 1 A (novo)
RECITAL 1 A (new)
(1a) Izključni namen uporabe biometričnih podatkov na vizumih je ustvarjenje zanesljivejše povezave med vizumi in njihovimi imetniki.
(1a) The sole purpose of including biometric data in the uniform format for visas is to establish a more reliable link between the visa and its holder.
(2) Vključitev biometričnih identifikatorjev je pomemben korak k uporabi novih elementov, ki vzpostavljajo zanesljivejšo povezavo med imetnikom in formatom vizuma kot pomemben prispevek, ki zagotavlja, da se enotni format vizumov zaščiti pred lažno uporabo.
(2) The integration of biometric identifiers is an important step towards the use of new elements, which establish a more reliable link between the holder and the visa format as an important contribution to ensuring that the uniform format for visas is protected against fraudulent use.
Upoštevane bodo specifikacije na strojno berljivih vizumih, ki so določene v dokumentu št. 9303 Mednarodne organizacije civilnega letalstva ICAO.
The specifications set out in the ICAO document No 9303 on machine readable visas should be taken into account.