natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (17032/2/2006 – C6‑0101/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (17032/2/2006 – C6‑0101/2007 ),
404. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0475 ),
404. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0475 ),
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2006)0245 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0245 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0169/2007 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0169/2007 ),
Finančni prispevek Skupnosti na področju vseevropskega prometnega in energetskega omrežja
Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport networks and energy
o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o pripravi in vsebini izmenjave podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence, med državami članicami
on the proposal for a Council framework decision on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from criminal records between Member States
absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta za zavrnitev ali spremembo skupnega stališča
majority of Parliament's component Members, to reject or amend the common position
absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta, razen v primerih, navedenih v členih 105, 107, 161 in 300 Pogodbe ES in členu 7 Pogodbe EU
majority of Parliament's component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0690 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0690 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 31 in člena 34(2)(b) Pogodbe EU,
– having regard to Articles 31 and 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0052/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0052/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0170/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0170/2007 ),
(8a) Zaradi dejstva, da se pri eni kazenski obsodbi lahko uporablja različne pravne postopke, prihaja do izmenjave nezanesljivih podatkov med državami članicami in se pri obsojeni osebi ustvarja pravna negotovost.
(8a) The fact that different legal regimes may apply to a single criminal conviction leads to the circulation of unreliable information between Member States and creates legal uncertainty for the convicted person.
Da bi se izognili tej situaciji, bi morala država članica, ki je izrekla obsodbo, veljati za lastnico podatkov o kazenskih obsodbah, izrečenih na njenem ozemlju proti državljanom drugih držav članic.
To avoid this situation, the convicting Member State should be regarded as the owner of the data on criminal convictions handed down on its territory against nationals of other Member States.
V skladu s tem mora država članica državljanstva obsojene osebe, kateri bodo ti podatki poslani, zagotoviti, da se ti podatki posodabljajo z upoštevanjem vsake spremembe ali izbrisa, do katere pride v državi članici, ki je izrekla obsodbo.
Accordingly, the Member State of nationality of the convicted person, to which these data will be transmitted, must ensure that they are kept up-to-date by taking into account any alteration or deletion occurring in the convicting Member State.
Država članica državljanstva lahko uporablja za notranje namene ali pošilja naprej drugim državam, bodisi državam članicam bodisi tretjim državam, le podatke, ki so se na ta način posodabljali.
Only data that have been kept up-to-date in this way should be used internally by the Member State of nationality or further transmitted by it to any other State, being another Member State or a third country.
(10) Osebni podatki, obdelani v okviru izvajanja tega okvirnega sklepa, so varovani v skladu z določbami Okvirnega sklepa XXX o varstvu osebnih podatkov, obdelanih v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah.
(10) Personal data handled as part of the implementation of this Framework Decision are protected in accordance with the provisions of Framework Decision XXX on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters .
Ta okvirni sklep med drugim vključuje določbe sklepa z dne 21. novembra 2005 o izmenjavi podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence¹¹, ki določajo omejitve za državo članico prosilko glede uporabe podatkov, ki jih je prejela na podlagi svojega zahtevka.
This Framework Decision also incorporates the provisions of the Decision of 21 November 2005 on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal records11, which limit the use the requesting Member State can make of information asked for.
Te določbe dopolnjuje z določitvijo tudi posebnih pravil za ponovno posredovanje podatkov o kazenskih obsodbah s strani države članice državljanstva, ki jih je le-ta prvotno dobila od države članice, ki je izrekla obsodbo.
It supplements them with specific rules applying where the Member State of the person’s nationality forward conviction information transmitted to it by the convicting Member State.
(10) Osebni podatki, obdelani v okviru izvajanja tega okvirnega sklepa, so varovani v skladu z določbami Okvirnega sklepa XXX o varstvu osebnih podatkov, obdelanih v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah ter še posebej v skladu s temeljnimi načeli za zaščito podatkov iz člena 9 tega okvirnega sklepa .
(10) Personal data handled as part of the implementation of this Framework Decision are protected in accordance with the provisions of Framework Decision XXX on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and in particular with the basic principles of data protection referred to in Article 9 of this Framework Decision.
Ta okvirni sklep med drugim vključuje določbe Sklepa z dne 21. novembra 2005 o izmenjavi podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence, ki določajo omejitve za državo članico prosilko glede uporabe podatkov, ki jih je prejela na podlagi svojega zahtevka.
This Framework Decision also incorporates the provisions of the Decision of 21 November 2005 on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal records, which limit the use the requesting Member State can make of information asked for.
Okvirni sklep o zaščiti podatkov v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja, ki bi se moral kot temeljni in splošni zakon (lex generalis ) uporabljati tudi za obstoječi akt, še vedno ni dokončan; zato se zdi potrebno spomniti na osnovna splošna načela za zaščito podatkov, ki jih je treba spoštovati pri zbiranju, obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov znotraj tega okvirnega sklepa.
The Framework decision on data protection in the context of police and judicial cooperation, which should apply also to the present act as a lex generalis, is still in the process of being finalised; for this reasons it seems necessary to recall a basic set of general data protection principles to be respected while collecting, processing, transmitting data within the scope of present Framework Decision.
(12a) Izboljšanje izmenjave in razširjanja podatkov o obsodbah lahko znatno okrepi pravosodno in policijsko sodelovanje na ravni EU, vendar je to sodelovanje lahko ovirano, če ni podprto s hitrim sprejetjem enotnega sklopa osnovnih postopkovnih jamstev za osumljence in obdolžence v kazenskih postopkih, ki bodo veljavni v vseh državah članicah.
(12a) Improving the exchange and circulation of information on convictions can considerably enhance judicial and police cooperation at EU level but such cooperation may be hampered if it is not supplemented by the swift adoption of a uniform set of basic procedural guarantees for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings applicable in all Member States.
Okvirni sklep o postopkovnih jamstvih za osumljence in obdolžence v kazenskih postopkih že od leta 2004 čaka na sprejetje v Svetu in ta zaostanek lahko pomeni znatno oviro za napredek pri pravosodnem in policijskem sodelovanju, še posebej z ustvarjanjem konfliktov z ustavnimi ukrepi na nacionalni ravni.
The Framework Decision on procedural guarantees for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings is still pending adoption in Council since 2004 and this delay can considerably hamper progresses in judicial and police cooperation, in particular creating conflicts with constitutional measures at a national level.
( ne zadeva slovenske različice )
However, this is not an option but an obligation.
a) „obsodba“: vsaka končna odločba kazenskega sodišča ali upravnega organa, zoper katero je možna pritožba na pristojno sodišče, zlasti kazensko , s katero je ugotovljena krivda osebe za kaznivo dejanje ali dejanje, kaznivo po nacionalnem pravu kot kršitev pravnih pravil ;
a) "conviction" means any final decision of a criminal court or of an administrative authority whose decision can be appealed against before a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters , establishing guilt of a criminal offence or an act punishable in accordance with national law as an offence against the law
a) „obsodba“: vsaka končna odločba sodišča , s katero je v kazenskem postopku ugotovljena krivda osebe za kaznivo dejanje po nacionalnem pravu
(a) “conviction” means any final court decision establishing guilt in criminal proceedings for a criminal offence under national law
Za namene tega okvirnega sklepa vsaka država članica določi osrednji organ.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, each Member State shall designate a central authority.
Vendar lahko države članice za sporočanje podatkov v skladu s členom 4 in za odgovore na zahtevke iz členov 6 in 7 določijo enega ali več osrednjih organov.
However, for the transmission of information under Article 4 and for replies to requests as referred to in Articles 6 and 7 , Member States may designate one or more central authorities.
Vendar lahko države članice za sporočanje podatkov v skladu s členom 4 in za odgovore na zahtevke za podatke iz člena 7 določijo enega ali več osrednjih organov.
However, for the transmission of information under Article 4 and for replies to requests for information under Article 7 , Member States may designate one or more central authorities.
Oblika odgovora na zahtevke za podatke je določena v členu 7 predloga.
Article 7 of the proposal specifies how requests for information should be replied to.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da se vsaki obsodbi, izrečeni na njenem ozemlju, pri posredovanju v nacionalno kazensko evidenco doda zaznamek o državljanstvu obsojene osebe, če gre za državljana katere koli države članice.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure all convictions handed down within its territory are accompanied, when transmitted to the national criminal record, by the nationality of the convicted person if they are a national of another Member State.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da se vsaki obsodbi, izrečeni na njenem ozemlju potem, ko je bila vpisana v kazensko evidenco , pri posredovanju v nacionalno kazensko evidenco doda zaznamek o državljanstvu ali državljanstvih obsojene osebe, če gre za državljana druge države članice.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure all convictions handed down within its territory , after they have been entered in the criminal record, are accompanied, when transmitted to the national criminal record, by the nationality or nationalities of the convicted person if they are a national of another Member State.
Nespremenjeni člen izpostavlja obveznost posredovanja obsodb, a ne omenja predhodne obveznosti vpisa teh obsodb v kazensko evidenco države, kjer je bila obsodba izrečena.
The unamended article refers to the obligation to forward details of sentences, but does not mention the prior obligation to enter them in the register of criminal records of the Member States where the sentence was passed.
Upoštevati moramo možnost, da ima obsojena oseba lahko več državljanstev .
It should also be taken into account that the convicted person may have more than one nationality.
Kadar je zadevna oseba državljan več držav članic, se podatki posredujejo vsaki od teh držav članic, tudi takrat, kadar je obsojena oseba državljan države članice, na ozemlju katere je bila obsojena.
If the interested party is a national of several Member States, the relevant information shall be transmitted to each of these Member States, even if the convicted person is a national of the Member State within whose territory they have been convicted.
Če je znano, da je zadevna oseba državljan več držav članic, se podatki posredujejo vsaki od teh držav članic, tudi takrat, kadar je obsojena oseba državljan države članice, na ozemlju katere je bila obsojena.
If the interested party is known to be a national of several Member States, the relevant information shall be transmitted to each of these Member States, even if the convicted person is a national of the Member State within whose territory they have been convicted.
V nekaterih primerih je možno, da ni znano dvojno državljanstvo obsojene osebe.
In some cases it may not be known that a convicted person has double nationality.
Posredovanje podatkov o obsodbah zajema tudi zaznamek o trajanju hrambe vpisa obsodbe v register države članice, ki je izrekla obsodbo, kakršno izhaja iz uporabe nacionalne zakonodaje države članice, ki je izrekla obsodbo, v trenutku posredovanja obsodbe državi članici državljanstva.
The transmission of information on convictions shall also include the length of time the conviction is to remain in the register of the convicting Member State, in accordance with that the convicting Member State's national legislation at the time of transmission to the Member State of the person's nationality.
Ta obveza je neizvedljiva za tiste države članice, v katerih se po njihovi nacionalni zakonodaji poleg odslužitve kazni zahteva izpolnitev določenih pogojev za izbris iz kazenske evidence kot na primer plačilo kazni, določene v obsodbi .
It would be impossible to comply with this obligation in the case of Member States whose national legislation requires certain criteria, in addition to the prison term having been served, for a conviction to be considered spent (e.g. having paid the fine forming part of the sentence).
Člen 4, odstavek 4
Article 4, paragraph
Kasnejše ukrepe, sprejete ob uporabi nacionalne zakonodaje države članice, ki je izrekla obsodbo, ki obsegajo spremembo ali izbris podatkov iz kazenske evidence, vključno s spremembami glede trajanja hrambe podatkov , osrednji organ države članice, ki je izrekla obsodbo, nemudoma posreduje osrednjemu organu države članice državljanstva.
Any subsequent measures taken in application of the convicting Member State's national legislation which involve an alteration or deletion of information contained in criminal records , including those affecting the length of time the information is to be kept, shall be immediately transmitted by the central authority of the convicting Member State to the central authority of the Member State of the person's nationality.
Kasnejše spremembe ali izbris podatkov iz kazenske evidence osrednji organ države članice, ki je izrekla obsodbo, nemudoma posreduje osrednjemu organu države članice državljanstva.
Any subsequent alteration or deletion of information contained in criminal records shall be immediately transmitted by the central authority of the convicting Member State to the central authority of the Member State of the person's nationality.
Vsakršna posodobitev ali sprememba podatkov v kazenski evidenci države, v kateri je bila izrečena obsodba, mora biti nemudoma posredovana državi članici državljanstva, da se posodobijo podatki v njeni kazenski evidenci .
Any updating or alteration of the criminal records of the convicting Member State must be immediately transmitted to that of the person's nationality, to ensure that the data in the latter's criminal records are kept up-to-date.
Osrednji organ države članice državljanstva v celoti hrani podatke, posredovane na podlagi člena 4 , da jih lahko ponovno posreduje v skladu s členom 7.
The central authority of the Member State of the person's nationality shall store all information transmitted under Article 4 , in order to be able to retransmit it in accordance with Article 7.
Izraz „v celoti“ bi lahko bil razumljen na več načinov.
'All' could give rise to more than one interpretation.
Zato se je glede vsebine podatkov bolje sklicevati na člen 11.
It therefore seems preferable to refer to Article 11 regarding the content of the information.
Namen predloga spremembe je tudi preprečiti izkrivljanje podatkov, ki ga lahko povzroči spreminjanje kategorije podatkov države, ki je izrekla obsodbo, v kategorijo države državljanstva.
The amendment also aims to prevent any distortions of information which might arise when converting the categories of data of the convicting Member State to those of the Member State of the person's nationality.
Država članica državljanstva lahko uporabi samo podatke, ki so posodobljeni v skladu z odstavkom 2.
The Member State of the person's nationality may only use information which has been updated in accordance with paragraph 2.
Obveznost iz odstavka 2 v nobenem primeru ne sme privesti do tega, da se zadevna oseba v okviru nacionalnega postopka obravnava slabše, kakor bi bila, če bi obsodbo izreklo nacionalno sodišče.
The obligation provided for by paragraph 2 may not lead to less favourable treatment in national proceedings than if the person had been convicted by a national court.
Pravilo v črtanem stavku ni povezano z vsebino predloga.
The rule proposed in the deleted sentence has nothing to do with the content of the proposal.
Kadar se zahtevajo podatki iz nacionalne kazenske evidence države članice, lahko osrednji organ v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pošlje zahtevek za izpis iz kazenske evidence in za podatke o kazenski evidenci osrednjemu organu druge države članice.
When information from the national criminal record of a Member State is requested, the central authority may, in accordance with national law, submit a request to the central authority of another Member State for information and related data to be extracted from the criminal record.
Kadar se v okviru kazenskega postopka zoper neko osebo ali za drugo uporabo kot za kazenski postopek zahtevajo podatki iz nacionalne kazenske evidence države članice, lahko osrednji organ v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pošlje zahtevek za izpis iz kazenske evidence in za podatke o kazenski evidenci osrednjemu organu druge države članice.
When , in the context of criminal proceedings against someone or for any other reason outside the framework of criminal proceedings, information from the national criminal record of a Member State is requested, the central authority may, in accordance with national law, submit a request to the central authority of another Member State for information and related data to be extracted from the criminal record.
Treba je upoštevati obe možnosti iz člena 7 predloga .
It is necessary to include the situations covered by Article 7 of the proposal.
Člen 6, odstavek 1a (novo)
Article 6, paragraph 1a (new)
Ko se podatki iz kazenske evidence države državljanstva zahtevajo za drugo uporabo kot za kazenski postopek, mora država članica, ki zahteva podatke, navesti razlog za svoje zahteve.
Where information is requested from the register of criminal records in the Member State of the person's nationality for any purpose outside the framework of criminal proceedings, the requesting Member State shall specify its reasons for making it.
Ta predlog spremembe je v skladu z besedilom člena 9(2) predloga in odraža potrebo po določitvi posebnih primerov, ko se podatke lahko posreduje na podlagi zakonodaje države obsodbe ali države državljanstva, odvisno od primera, za uporabo zunaj kazenskega postopka .
This amendment is in line with the wording of Article 9(2) of the proposal and corresponds to the need to define the specific cases in which such information may be transmitted under the law of the convicting Member State or that of the person's nationality, according to the circumstances, in order to be used outside the framework of a criminal procedure.
Kadar oseba zahteva podatke o svoji lastni kazenski evidenci, lahko osrednji organ države članice, v kateri se ta zahtevek vloži, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pošlje zahtevek za izpis iz kazenske evidence in za podatke o kazenski evidenci osrednjemu organu druge države članice, če zadevna oseba je ali je bila prebivalec ali državljan države članice prosilke ali zaprošene države članice.
When a person asks for information on their own criminal record, the central authority of the Member State in which the request is made may , in accordance with national law, submit a request to the central authority of another Member State for information and related data to be extracted from the criminal record, provided the interested party is or has been a resident or a national of the requesting or requested Member State.
Kadar oseba zahteva podatke o svoji lastni kazenski evidenci, (črtano) osrednji organ države članice, v kateri se ta zahtevek vloži, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pošlje zahtevek za izpis iz kazenske evidence in za podatke o kazenski evidenci osrednjemu organu druge države članice, če zadevna oseba je ali je bila prebivalec ali državljan države članice prosilke ali zaprošene države članice.
When a person asks for information on their own criminal record, the central authority of the Member State in which the request is made shall , in accordance with national law, submit a request to the central authority of another Member State for information and related data to be extracted from the criminal record, provided the interested party is or has been a resident or a national of the requesting or requested Member State.
V primerih, ko zadevna oseba prebiva oziroma je prebivala ali je sedaj oziroma je bila državljan druge države članice in to lahko dokaže, država članica, kjer je bila vložena zahteva za podatke, ne more odločati, ali bo posredovala podatke drugi državi ali ne.
In cases where the person concerned is or has been a resident or national of a Member State and these circumstances are confirmed, a request for information from that Member State cannot depend on the choice of the Member State where the request is made.
a) nacionalne obsodbe
a) national convictions
a) nacionalne obsodbe, vpisane v kazensko evidenco.
a) national convictions entered in the register of criminal records .
Treba je razjasniti, da imajo pravni učinek le vpisane obsodbe in ne tiste, ki so bile izbrisane zaradi odslužitve.
The aim is to make it clear that only offences included in the register, i.e. not considered spent once the sentence has been served, produce legal effects.
Predlog spremembe je tudi povezan z naslednjim predlogom spremembe, da se ne ustvari prezapletenega sistema, ki bi lahko oviral izmenjavo podatkov .
This amendment should be considered in conjunction with the following amendment, the aim being not to create an over-complex regime which could pose obstacles to the exchange of information.
d) obsodbe, izrečene v tretjih državah, ki jih je prejel.
d) any convictions handed down in third countries and subsequently transmitted to it.
d) obsodbe, izrečene v tretjih državah, ki jih je prejel in so vpisane v njegovo kazensko evidenco .
d) any convictions handed down in third countries and subsequently transmitted to it and entered in its register of criminal records .
Pojasniti je treba, da imajo pravni učinek le vpisane obsodbe in ne tiste, ki so bile izbrisane.
The aim is to ensure that only convictions which are on the register - i.e. not considered spent once the sentence has been served - produce legal effects.