natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V členu 153 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
In Article 153, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
(Člen 153(1) v spremenjeni obliki ustreza prvotnemu besedilu v Uredbi (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002.)
(Article 153, paragraph 1, as amended, corresponds to the original version in Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
Ohranitev pravic Parlamenta.
Preservation of Parliament's prerogatives.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 82 A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 82 A (new)
Člen 160 b (novo) (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 160 b (new) (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
Za členom 160a se doda člen 160b:
The following Article 160b is inserted after Article 160a:
"Člen 160b
'Article 160b
Z odstopanjem od člena 110 se lahko razpise objavi že v prejšnjem letu s pridržkom razpoložljivosti sredstev v naslednjem letu.
Notwithstanding Article 110, a call for proposals may already be published in the previous year, subject to the availability of the appropriations in the following year.
Ne glede na čas objave in ne glede na člen 115 so v razpisu navedeni vsi predpisi, ki veljajo za dodelitev donacije (zlasti določbe o izključitvi iz členov 93 in 94); pri tem so dovoljene napotitve na standarde.
Irrespective of the time of publication and notwithstanding Article 115, the Commission shall indicate all the rules which apply to the award of the grant (particularly the exclusion criteria as referred to in Articles 93 and 94), in which connection references to provisions are permissible.
Pravila, ki jih je treba uporabljati, so v času trajanja postopka zavezujoča v obliki, v kateri so bili objavljeni."
Throughout the procedure, the rules to be applied shall be binding in the version applicable at the time of the announcement. '
Glej predlog spremembe k členu 110.
See the amendment to Article 110.
Z objavo razpisa v prejšnjem letu naj bi preprečili kopičenje postopkov dodeljevanja donacij na začetku leta in zamude, ki iz tega izvirajo.
Publication the previous year is intended to prevent grant procedures from being concentrated at the beginning of the year, which causes delays.
S prepovedjo spreminjanja pravil v času trajanja postopka se bodo zmanjšali upravni izdatki za upravičence, skrajšali postopki in poenotila politika dodeljevanja donacij.
The prohibition on any amendment while a procedure is in progress will reduce the quantity of administrative work for the beneficiaries, tighten up procedures and unify policy on grants.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 85A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 85 A (new)
Člen 168, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1a (novo) (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 168, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new) (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
(85a) Členu 168(1) se doda naslednji pododstavek:
(85a) In Article 168(1), the following subparagraph is added :
"V zvezi z zunanjo pomočjo Skupnosti se uporabljajo pravila za sodelovanje v razpisnih postopkih iz Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 2110/2005 z dne 14. decembra 2005 o dostopu do zunanje pomoči Skupnosti 1 in Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2112/2005 z dne 21. novembra 2005 o dostopu do zunanje pomoči Skupnosti 2 .
"As regards Community external assistance, the rules for the participation in tendering procedures laid down in Regulation( EC) No 2110/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2005 on access to Community external assistance 1 and Council Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005 of 21 November 2005 on access to Community external assistance 2 shall apply.
1 UL L 344, 27.12.2005, str.
1 OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p.
2 UL L 344, 27.12.2005, str.
2 OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p.
Pravila iz teh uredb se morajo uporabljati in vključiti v Finančno uredbo.
These rules have to be applied and should be incorporated in the Financial Regulation.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 87
ARTICLE 1, POINT 87
Člen 169 a, odstavek 1 a (novo) (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 169a, paragraph 1a (new) (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
Kot upravičeni stroški se lahko uveljavljajo zlasti:
The following, in particular, may be claimed as costs eligible for financing:
d) stroški zunanje revizije (člena 117 in 119);
(c) the costs of an external audit (Articles 117 and 119);
e) upravni izdatki, stroški osebja in materiala;
(d) the costs of administrative expenditure and staff and equipment costs;
Glej predlog spremembe k členu 113a.
See the amendment to Article 113a: small nongovernmental organisations, in particular, working in the field of development aid cannot themselves bear the costs of lodging surety.
Prav majhne nevladne organizacije na področju razvojne pomoči ne zmorejo same plačevati stroškov, ki izvirajo iz zagotavljanja jamstev, vendar se jih ne sme dejansko izločiti iz donacije.
However, these should not in consequence in effect be excluded from subsidisation.
Podobno velja za nevladne organizacije, ki niso upravičene do odbitka vstopnega davka.
The same applies to the problem of nongovernmental organisations, which do not have the benefit of a deduction of input tax.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 94A (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 94 A (new)
Člen 179, odstavek 3, pododstavek 1 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 179, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
(94a) V členu 179(3) se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(94a) In Article 179(3), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
Institucije oba proračunska organa čim prej obvestijo o projektih gradnje s predvidenimi velikimi finančnimi posledicami za proračun,vendar vsaj 3 tedne pred rokom, do katerega se mora odločiti proračunski organ."
The institutions shall inform the two branches of the budgetary authority as soon as possible, but at least 3 weeks prior to any deadline before which a decision has to be taken by the budgetary authority, of any building project likely to have significant financial implications for the budget."
Institucije, navedene v odstavku 179.3, morajo obvestiti oba proračunska organa vsaj 3 tedne pred rokom, do katerega se mora odločiti proračunski organ, da bi lahko kot proračunski organ pripravil tehtno finančno oceno o projektu gradnje s posledicami za proračun Evropske unije.
In order to be able to make sound financial judgements as a budgetary authority on a building project with implications for the European Union's budget, the Institutions referred to under paragraph 179.3 need to inform the two branches at least 3 weeks prior to any deadline before which a decision has to be taken by the budgetary authority.
Tako bosta lahko oba proračunska organa po potrebi zaprosila za pojasnila in dodatne poizvedbe.
This will enable both arms of the budgetary authority to ask for more clarification and further inquiries when deemed necessary.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 94 B (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 94 B (new)
Člen 183, stavek 2 (novo)(Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 183, second sentence (new) (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
V členu 183 se doda naslednji stavek:
The following sentence is inserted in 183:
"Za mnenje mora zaprositi proračunski organ in ga ustrezno upoštevati, kjer je to primerno."
'It shall seek the opinion of the budgetary authority and take due account thereof, where appropriate.'
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 94 C (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 94 C (new)
Člen 185, odstavek 1 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 185, paragraph 1 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
(94c) V členu 185 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(94c) In Article 185, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Komisija sprejme okvirno finančno uredbo za organe, ki jih ustanovijo Skupnosti in so pravne osebe.
The Commission shall adopt a framework financial regulation for the bodies set up by the Union and having legal personality.
Finančni predpisi za organe ne smejo odstopati od okvirne uredbe, razen če to zahtevajo njihove specifične potrebe za poslovanje in s predhodnim soglasjem Komisije."
The financial rules governing these bodies may not depart from the framework regulation except where their specific operating needs so require and with the Commission's prior consent."
Zaradi preglednosti, odgovornosti in doslednosti velja okvirna finančna uredba za vse agencije, ki delujejo v imenu Unije, ne glede ne na to, ali prejemajo donacije iz proračuna,
For reasons of transparency, accountability and consistency, all agencies that act on behalf of the Union, irrespective of whether they receive grants charged to the budget, should be subject to the framework financial regulation .
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 95
ARTICLE 1, POINT 95
Člen 185, odstavek 3 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 185, paragraph 3 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
Vsak organ iz odstavka 1 vzpostavi funkcijo notranjega revizorja, ki se mora izvajati v skladu z ustreznimi mednarodnimi standardi.
Each body referred to in paragraph 1 shall establish an internal audit function which must be performed in compliance with the relevant international standards.
Notranji revizor Komisije potrdi, da delovanje notranjih revizij ustreza mednarodnim revizorskim standardom in lahko s tem namenom izvede presojo kakovosti.
The Commission's internal auditor shall certify that the operation of the audit function respects international audit standards and, for that purpose, may conduct quality audits.
Notranji revizor Komisije opravlja revizije za organe iz odstavka 1.
The Commission's internal auditor shall conduct the audits for the bodies referred to in paragraph 1.
Organi iz odstavka 1 lahko vzpostavijo funkcijo notranjega revizorja.
The bodies referred to in paragraph 1 may establish an internal audit function.
Notranji revizor Komisije lahko v utemeljenih primerih prenese svojo nalogo notranjim revizorjem teh organov.
The Commission's internal auditor may, in duly substantiated cases, delegate his task to their internal auditors.
Prenos je treba opraviti pisno in navesti razloge zanj ter imena odgovornih revizorjev (tistega, ki prenaša in tistega, na kogar so naloge prenesene).
This delegation shall be made in writing, setting out the reasons for delegation and the names of the responsible auditors (delegating and delegate).
Ne glede na prenos lahko notranji revizor Komisije opravlja notranje revizije za organe iz odstavka 1 in prekliče prenos, kadarkoli se mu zdi to potrebno.
Notwithstanding the delegation, the Commission's internal auditor may conduct internal audits for the bodies referred to in paragraph 1 and revoke the delegation at any time he thinks fit.
Ko organi iz odstavka 1 vzpostavijo funkcijo notranjega revizorja, jo je treba izvajati v skladu s smernicami, ki jih je določil notranji revizor Komisije.
In cases in which an internal audit function is set up by the bodies referred to in paragraph 1, it shall be performed in compliance with guidelines established by the Commission's internal auditor.
Te smernice vključujejo obveznost predložitve vseh in kakršnih koli poročil notranjemu revizorju Komisije.
These guidelines shall include a duty to submit all and any reports made to the Commission's internal auditor.
Notranji revizor Komisije potrdi, da delovanje notranjih revizij ustreza standardom notranje revizije in lahko s tem namenom izvede presojo kakovosti.
The Commission's internal auditor shall certify that the operation of the audit function meets internal audit standards and, for that purpose, may conduct quality audits."
Pojasniti vlogo notranjega revizorja Komisije.
Clarify position of Commission's Internal Auditor.
Notranji revizor Komisije ima pooblastila za prenos nalog na notranje revizijske službe agencij, pri čemer ohranja nadzor nad računovodstvom v agencijah in odgovornost zanj.
Commission's Internal Auditor is being empowered to delegate tasks to agencies' internal audit services while maintaining control over and responsibility for accounting within the agencies.
Člen 185, odstavek 4 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 185, paragraph 4 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
Organi iz člena 121 uporabljajo računovodska pravila iz člena 133, da se lahko njihovi računovodski izkazi konsolidirajo z računovodskimi izkazi Komisije.
The bodies referred to in Article 121 shall apply the accounting rules set out in Article 133 so that their accounts can be consolidated with the Commission's accounts.
Vključeno v člen 133.
Covered by Article 133
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
Finančna uredba iz leta 2002 in njene izvedbene določbe so povzročile veliko težav upravičencem programov EU, še zlasti upravičencem razvojnih programov (razvojnim nevladnim organizacijam in drugim upravičencem).
The Financial Regulation of 2002 and its implementing rules have caused many problems for beneficiaries of EU programmes, not least for beneficiaries of development programmes (Development NGOs and other beneficiaries).
Finančna uredba določa okvir in splošne določbe za izvrševanje proračuna EU.
The Financial Regulation gives the frame and the general rules for the implementation of the EU budget.
Uredba o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje finančne uredbe iz leta 2002 opredeljuje določbe Finančne uredbe.
The Regulation laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Financial Regulation of 2002 is specifying the rules of the Financial Regulation.
Veliko vprašanj, ki povzročajo težave, kot so na primer težave v zvezi z odločbo o državljanstvu in odločbo o poreklu, plačilnimi roki ter možnostjo spremembe sporazuma o donaciji po njegovi odobritvi, je bolj tehnične narave in se jih lahko reši samo s pregledom izvedbenih določb.
Many issues that cause problems are of a more technical nature and can only be tackled with a revision of the implementing rules, such as the problems relating to rule of nationality and rule of origin, the questions of payment periods and the possibility to change a grant agreement after approval.
Pripravljavec mnenja predlaga, da se v finančno uredbo vključijo nekatere točke, ki bodo omogočile njeno lažje izvajanje, kot so vzpostavitev sistemov za merjenje in primerjavo učinkovitosti, proračunsko načelo, ki je pri izvrševanju proračuna pogosto neupoštevano, uvedba analize tveganj za potrditev plačil, povezanost uredb za sprostitev pomoči s finančno uredbo in stroškovna nevtralnost pri menjalnih poslih.
The draftsman proposes to introduce a couple of elements in the Financial Regulation which would help to improve the implementation such as the establishment of systems to measure and compare efficiency, the budgetary principle which is rather neglected in budget implementation, the introduction of risk analysis for the validation of payments, the connection of the untying of aid regulations to the Financial Regulation and the cost-neutrality of currency conversion operations.
Uvodna izjava 27 a (novo)
RECITAL 27 A (new)
(27a) Analiza tveganja se že uporablja za naknadna preverjanja.
(27a) Risk analysis is already used for ex post verification.
Njena uporaba za potrditev izdatkov, ki bo omogočila bolj učinkovito izvrševanje tega dela proračuna, mora biti vključena v člen 79 Finančne uredbe.
Its use for the validation of expenditure will make this part of the budget implementation more efficient and should be introduced in Article 79 of the Financial Regulation.
Pri naknadnem preverjanju plačil izvedbene določbe v členu 47 dopuščajo, da "se ta preverjanja lahko izvajajo z vzorčenjem v okviru analize tveganja".
As regards ex post verification of the payments, the same implementing rules (Article 47) allow that these "verifications may be organised on a sample basis using risk analysis."
Če se izvaja pregled statističnega vzorčenja, se lahko potrdi samo z določeno stopnjo verjetnosti (do določene stopnje zaupanja), da je zahtevek za plačilo pravilen.
If a statistically based sample check is carried out, then it is only possible to certify that 'on the balance of probability' (to a level of confidence) the claim is correct.
S preoblikovanjem finančne uredbe leta 2002 se je povečala odgovornost uradnikov in drugih uslužbencev (člen 66).
In the recasting of the Financial Regulation in 2002, the liability of officials and other servants has been increased (Article 66).
Poleg večje odgovornosti je zahteva, da se zaznamku "odobreno za plačilo" doda zaznamek "potrjujem pravilnost", pri uradnikih povzročila občutek negotovosti, tako da od upravičencev zahtevajo vedno več dokumentov in potrdil, preden jim odobrijo plačilo donacij.
Together with increased liability, the requirement to issue an endorsement 'certified correct' has led to insecurity and reluctance on the side of officials to treat payments for grants, requesting more and more documents and certificates from the beneficiaries.
Ker za naknadno preverjanje zadostuje, da se "izvaja z vzorčenjem v okviru analize tveganja", bi morali pojem analize tveganja vpeljati tudi v proces potrditve izdatkov.
As it is sufficient for the ex post verification to "be organised on a sample basis using risk analysis" it should be possible to introduce the notion of risk analysis in the process of validation of expenditure.
Analiza tveganja ne more zamenjati vseh drugih zahtev za odobritev plačila donacij, zato pa bi uradnikom omogočila, da v odsotnosti strogo omejenega števila formalnih zahtev (dokumentov, potrdil), odobrijo plačilo donacije v mejah diskrecijskih pooblastil.
Risk analysis cannot generally replace other requirements for a "passing of payment of grants", but it would give the official a margin of discretion to pass payments for grants in the absence of a strictly limited number of formal requirements (documentation, certificates).
To bi omogočilo ocenitev tveganja glede na učinkovitost in uspešnost.
This would allow setting the risks in correlation with efficiency and effectiveness.
Uvodna izjava 36 a (novo)
RECITAL 36 A (new)
(36a) Komisija mora predvideti možnost dodeljevanja donacij nad splošno mejo, določeno za dodeljevanje donacij, za projekte v sektorju za zunanjo pomoč Skupnosti brez razpisnega postopka, če so projekti posebne in izredne narave.
(36a) The Commission should provide for the possibility of awarding grants for projects in the sector of Community external assistance without resorting to a tendering procedure even when the general limit set for awarding grants without a tendering procedure is bypassed, if the project is of a very specific and exceptional nature.
Možnost dodeljevanja donacij brez razpisnega postopka je strogo omejena, kar pripravljavec mnenja načelno pozdravlja.
The possibility to award grants without tendering procedure is strictly limited, which is in principle welcomed by the draftsman.
Vendar pa lahko obstajajo predlogi za projekte, ki so tako izredne in posebne narave, da je malo verjetno, da bi jih lahko predlagal ali izvršil drug ponudnik.
However, there may be project proposals which are of such exceptional and specific nature that it is highly unlikely that they could be proposed or carried out by another tenderer.
V tem primeru mora Komisija imeti možnost, da brez razpisnega postopka prekorači mejo, ki je določena za dodeljevanje donacij.
In this case, the Commission should have the possibility to exceed the limit given for awarding grants without tendering procedure.
Člen 1, točka 7 a (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 7 A (new)
Člen 16, odstavek 2 a (novo) (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 16, paragraph 2 a (new) (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
(7a) Členu 16 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(7a) In Article 16, the following paragraph is added:
"Menjalni posli se izvajajo tako, da se višina sofinanciranja Unije za donacije za projekte bistveno ne spremeni."
"Currency conversion operations shall be carried out in such a way that there is no major change to the level of Union cofinancing for project grants."
Ta predlog spremembe spreminja predlog spremembe, ki ga je predlagal poročevalec Odbora za proračun (predlog spremembe 31 osnutka poročila, ki ga je pripravila Ingeborg Gräßle), da bi bilo besedilo jasnejše.
This amendment modifies the amendment proposed by the rapporteur of the Committee on Budgets (Amendment 31 of the draft report by Ingeborg Gräßle) and seeks to make the text clearer.
Namen predloga spremembe je, da prepreči situacije, kjer bi imeli upravičenci zaradi razlik v deviznih tečajih izgubo ali kjer bi zaradi sprememb deviznega tečaja težko utemeljiti višino izdatkov, izraženih v tujih valutah, če je njihov znesek v eurih drugačen.
The amendment is intended to help avoid situations where the currency conversion leads to losses for the beneficiaries or problems to justify the level of expenses, which would be the level planned in the foreign currency, while it is different in EURO, due to the changes in the exchange rate.
Čen 1, točka 12 a (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 12 A (new)
(12a) Členu 27 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(12a) In Article 27, the following paragraph is added:
Institucije vzpostavijo sisteme za merjenje in primerjavo učinkovitosti in uspešnosti postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil ter postopkov za dodeljevanje donacij."
Institutions set up systems for measuring and comparing efficiency and effectiveness as regards procurement procedures and the procedure for the award of grants."
Komisija si pri izvrševanju proračuna prizadeva upoštevati načela dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in izvrševanja proračuna.
The Commission seeks to follow the principles of sound financial management in implementing the budget.
Tri glavna načela so gospodarnost, učinkovitost in uspešnost.
Three main elements of sound financial management are economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
Uradniki Komisije se v glavnem osredotočajo na gospodarnost ali z drugimi besedami na "najugodnejšo vrednost v skladu s postopki".
Commission officials are mainly concentrating on 'economy', which can be broken down as "best value through procedural compliance".
Finančna uredba (člen 27(2)2) opredeljuje načelo učinkovitosti kot "najboljše razmerje med uporabljenimi sredstvi in doseženimi rezultati."
The principle of efficiency described in the Financial Regulation (Article 27(2)2) as "best relationship between resources employed and results achieved".
Ob upoštevanju tega načela bi se morala Komisija ne samo osredotočiti na "sezname za preverjanje postopkov", temveč bi morala upoštevati tudi okvir donacij in postopke za oddajo javnih naročil ter upravne stroške zaradi postopkov.
Taking into account this principle would force the Commission not only to focus on "procedure check lists" but to take into account the context of the grant and procurement procedures and the administrative costs resulting from the procedures.
Člen 1, točka 37 a (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 37 A (new)
(3) Členu 79 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(3) In Article 79, the following paragraph is added:
"Analiza tveganja se lahko uporablja kot merilo za potrditev izdatkov."
" Risk analysis can be a criterion used for validation of expenditure."
Glej obrazložitev k predlogu spremembe 1.
See justification of amendment 1.
Člen 1, točka 85 a (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 85 A (new)
Člen 168, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1 a (novo) (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002)
Article 168, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new) (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002)
(85a) Členu 168(1) se doda naslednji pododstavek:
(85a) In Article 168, paragraph 1, the following subparagraph is added :
"V zvezi z zunanjo pomočjo Skupnosti se uporabljajo pravila za sodelovanje v razpisnih postopkih iz Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 2110/2005 z dne 14. decembra 2005 o dostopu do zunanje pomoči Skupnosti 1 in Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2112/2005 z dne 21. novembra 2005 o dostopu do zunanje pomoči Skupnosti 2 ."
"As regards Community external assistance the rules for the participation in tendering procedures laid down in Regulation(EC) No 2110/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2005 on access to Community external assistance 1 and Council Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005 of 21 November 2005 on access to Community external assistance 2 shall apply."
Pravila iz teh uredb se morajo uporabljati in vključiti v finančno uredbo.
These rules have to be applied and should be incorporated in the Financial Regulation.