natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Upravičenci do donacij Komisiji po potrebi predložijo dokumentacijo, s katero razpolagajo partnerji ali člani.
The beneficiary of a grant shall ensure that, where applicable, supporting documents in the possession of partners or members are made available to the Commission.
Komisija lahko bodisi neposredno s svojimi uslužbenci bodisi s pomočjo usposobljenega zunanjega organa po svoji izbiri izvede revizijo o uporabi financiranja Skupnosti.
The Commission may have an audit of the use made of the Community funding carried out either by its own staff or by a qualified outside body of its choice.
Take revizije se lahko izvajajo med celotnim trajanjem pogodbe ali sporazuma ter še pet let od datuma končnega plačila.
Such audits may be carried out throughout the lifetime of the contract or the agreement and for a period of five years following the last payment.
Komisija se lahko na podlagi ugotovitev revizije po potrebi odloči, da zahteva izterjavo zneska.
Where appropriate, the audit findings may lead to recovery decisions by the Commission.
Uslužbenci Komisije in zunanje osebje, ki ga je pooblastila Komisija, imajo ustrezno pravico do dostopa do lokacij in prostorov, kjer se dejavnost izvaja, in do vseh informacij, vključno s tistimi v elektronski obliki, ki so potrebne za izvajanje revizij.
Commission staff and outside personnel authorised by the Commission shall have appropriate right of access to sites and premises where the action is carried out and to all the information, including information in electronic format, needed in order to conduct such audits.
Računsko sodišče in OLAF imata iste pravice kot osebe iz odstavka 3, zlasti pravico dostopa.
The Court of Auditors and OLAF shall enjoy the same rights, especially the right of access, as the persons referred to in paragraph 3.
Nadalje Komisija za zaščito finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti pred goljufijami in drugimi nepravilnostmi izvaja preglede in nadzor na kraju samem v zvezi s tem programom v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96 z dne 11. novembra 1996 o pregledih in inšpekcijah na kraju samem, ki jih opravlja Komisija za zaščito finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti pred goljufijami in drugimi nepravilnostmi.
Furthermore, in order to protect the European Community's financial interests against fraud and other irregularities, the Commission shall carry out on-the-spot checks and inspections under this programme in accordance with Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities 1 .
1 UL L 292, 15.11.1996, str.
1 OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p.
2 UL L 136, 31.5.1999, str.
2 OJ L 136, 31.5.1999, p.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7, TOČKA (A) Člen 6, odstavek 1 (Sklep št. 804/2004/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 7, POINT (A) Article 6, paragraph 1 (Decision No 804/2004/EC)
Ta program se podaljša od 1. januarja 2007 in se zaključi 31. decembra 2013.
The current programme is extended from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013.
Ta program se podaljša s 1. januarjem 2007 in se zaključi 31. decembra 2013.
The current programme is extended from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 and will end on 31 December 2013 .
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 8 Člen 7 (Sklep št. 804/2004/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 8 Article 7 (Decision No 804/2004/EC)
(8) Člen 7 se spremeni:
(8) Article 7 is amended as follows:
(8) Člen 7 se spremeni:
(8) Article 7 shall be amended as follows:
„OLAF letno obvešča Evropski parlament in Svet o rezultatih programa.
“OLAF shall provide annual information on the results of the programme to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Posreduje tudi informacije o usklajenosti in medsebojnem dopolnjevanju z drugimi programi in dejavnostmi na ravni EU.
Information on consistency and complementarity with other programmes and activities at European Union level shall be included.
(a) odstavek (a) se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(a) Indent (a) is replaced by the following:
„Najpozneje do 31. decembra 2010 je treba predložiti poročilo OLAF-a o izvajanju programa in o ustreznosti njegovega nadaljevanja.“
“ by 31 December 2010 at the latest , a report by OLAF on the implementation of the programme and the appropriateness of continuing it;”
Neodvisna ocena izvajanja programa, vključno s pregledom njegove uspešnosti in uresničevanja ciljev, se opravi najpozneje do 31. decembra 2010 .
An independent assessment of the implementation of the programme, including an examination of performance and the achievement of the objectives of the programme, shall be carried out by 31 December 2010 at the latest .
(b) odstavek (b) se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(b) Indent (b) is replaced by the following:
„Najpozneje do 31. decembra 2014 je treba predložiti poročilo OLAF-a o uresničevanju ciljev tega programa.
“by 31 December 2014 at the latest, a report by OLAF on the achievement of the objectives of the programme.
To poročilo temelji na rezultatih, ki so jih dosegli upravičenci do donacij, in ocenjuje predvsem učinkovitost, ki jo dokažejo pri doseganju ciljev, določenih v členu 1 in Prilogi.“
The report, based on the results obtained by the beneficiaries, shall assess, in particular, their effectiveness in achieving the objectives defined in Article 1 and in the Annex. ”
OLAF najpozneje do 31. decembra 2014 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o uresničevanju ciljev tega programa.
By 31 December 2014 at the latest, OLAF shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the achievement of the objectives of the programme.”
Že v svojem mnenju o programu Herkul I je Evropsko računsko sodišče priporočilo, da bi moral OLAF vsako leto poročati o rezultatih programa.
Already in its opinion on the Hercule I programme, the European Court of Auditors had recommended that OLAF should report annually on the results of the programme.
Poleg tega bosta podaljšanje programskega obdobja in povečanje sredstev upravičena le, če bo proračunski organ lahko ocenil srednjeročne dosežke na podlagi neodvisne ocene.
In addition, the prolongation of the programming period and the budget increase will only be justified if the budgetary authority is enabled to evaluate the achievements at mid-term on the basis of an independent assessment.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 8 A (novo) Člen 7 a (novo) (Sklep št. 804/2004/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 8 A (new) Article 7 a (new) (Decision No 804/2004/EC)
(8a) Vstavi se naslednji člen 7a:
(8a) The following Article 7a shall be inserted:
„Člen 7a
“Article 7a
Upravljanje programa
Management of the programme
Na podlagi analize stroškovne učinkovitosti Komisija lahko zaposli strokovnjake ter uporabi katerokoli obliko tehnične in upravne pomoči, ki ne vključuje nalog javnih organov, ki so bile s pogodbami o storitvah prenesene na zunanje izvajalce.
On the basis of a cost-effectiveness analysis, the Commission may employ experts and make use of any other form of technical and administrative assistance not involving public authority tasks outsourced under ad hoc service contracts.
Komisija prav tako lahko financira študije in organizira srečanja strokovnjakov, da bi olajšala izvajanje programa, ter sprejema ukrepe v zvezi z obveščanjem, objavljanjem in širjenjem informacij, ki so neposredno povezani z izpolnjevanjem ciljev programa.“
It may also finance studies and organise meetings of experts to facilitate the implementation of the programme, and take information, publication and dissemination measures directly linked to fulfilling the objectives of the programme.”
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 8 B (novo) Priloga (Sklep št. 804/2004/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 8 B (new) Annex (Decision 804/2004/EC)
(8b) Priloga se črta.
(8b) The Annex is deleted.
Določbe priloge k sklepu se premaknejo v besedilo normativnega dela sklepa.
The provisions of the annex to the decision are being moved to the body of the decision.
Komisija je konec junija 2006 predložila obstoječi predlog o programu Herkul II, skupaj s poročilom o izvajanju začetnega programa Herkul I.
At the end of June 2006 the Commission submitted the present proposal on the Hercule II programme, together with a report on the implementation of the initial Hercule I programme.
Herkul I se je izvajal tri leta s finančnimi sredstvi v višini 11.775.000 EUR, medtem ko bo programsko obdobje programa Herkul II trajalo sedem let, finančna sredstva pa znašajo 98.525.000 EUR.
Whereas Hercule I was programmed for three years with a financial envelope of EUR11 775 000, the programming period of Hercule II will be 7 years and the financial envelope EUR 98 525 000.
Poročevalec meni, da so dejavnosti, financirane iz programa Herkul I, koristen prispevek k preprečevanju in odkrivanju dejavnosti, ki škodujejo finančnim interesom Skupnosti, ter boju proti njim.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that the activities financed from Hercule I constitute a useful contribution to the prevention, detection and the fight against activities damaging the Community's financial interests.
Zlasti je treba opozoriti na podporo organom v državah članicah v zvezi s posebnimi orodji informacijske tehnologije za medsebojno izmenjavo informacij in omrežno povezovanje.
The support for Member States' authorities as regards specific IT tools for the exchange of information and networking among each other has to be highlighted in particular.
Enako velja za dragocena prizadevanja, ki so bila vložena v povezovanje strokovnjakov iz vseh držav članic zaradi graditve medsebojnega zaupanja in trajnih delovnih odnosov.
The same is true for the valuable groundwork of bringing together experts from all Member States in order to build mutual trust and constant working relationships.
Program Herkul je prav tako omogočil uradu OLAF, da se odzove na posebne potrebe držav članic na zunanjih mejah in tudi na potrebe držav kandidatk.
The Hercule programme also enabled OLAF to respond to the specific needs of Member States at the external borders as well as Candidate Countries.
Zato je treba program utrditi in ga v obdobju nove finančne perspektive razširiti.
Thus, the programme deserves to be consolidated and extended during the new financial perspectives period.
Na osnovi tega poročevalec meni, da je občutno povečanje sredstev za Herkul II v primerjavi s programom Herkul I načeloma pozitivno.
As a consequence, the rapporteur considers the important budget increase of Hercule II compared to Hercule II as a positive development in principle.
Obstajata dva razloga za povečanje sredstev iz proračuna.
There are two reasons for the budget increase:
Prvi razlog je mnenje Računskega sodišča o programu Herkul I, v katerem priporoča njegovo financiranje iz enega člena proračuna.
Firstly, in its opinion on Hercule I, the European Court of Auditors had already recommended that Hercule be funded from a single budget article.
Zato poročevalec odobrava načrtovano združitev več proračunskih vrstic v en sam člen 24 02 01 z naslovom „Herkul II“, ki zajema financiranje vseh splošnih dejavnosti proti goljufijam.
Therefore, the rapporteur welcomes the planned merger of different budget lines into a single article 24 02 01, covering the financing of all general anti-fraud activities and entitled "Hercule II".
Združeni bodo:
The merger is concerning:
· postavka 24 02 04 01 (Program subvencioniranja za boj proti goljufijam),
· the current item 24 02 04 01 (Grant programme for anti-fraud measures)
· postavka 24 02 04 02 (Konference, kongresi in srečanja, povezani z dejavnostmi združenj evropskih pravnikov za zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti),
· the current item 24 02 04 02 (Conferences, congresses and meetings in connection with the activities of the associations of the European lawyers for the protection of the financial interests of the Community)
· člen 24 02 01 (Splošni ukrepi za boj proti goljufijam).
· the current article 24 02 01 (General measures to combat fraud)
Drugi razlog je, da bo Herkul II prejemal dodatna sredstva v višini od 6 do 7 milijonov EUR na leto po sporazumu proti tihotapljenju in ponarejanju cigaret, ki so ga Komisija in nekatere države članice sklenile s podjetjem Philip Morris International (PMI).
Secondly, Hercule II will receive supplementary funds of EUR 6-7 million per year, derived from the Anti-Contraband and Anti-Counterfeit Agreement between the Commission and several Member States with Philip Morris International (PMI).
Poročevalec pozdravlja dejstvo, da bosta preprečevanje tihotapljenja in ponarejanja cigaret ter boj proti njima postala eden temeljnih elementov programa Herkul II.
The rapporteur is pleased that the prevention and fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting will become one of the cornerstones of the Hercule II programme.
Odobrava sprejetje načrta o razdelitvi sredstev podjetja PMI (približno 800.000.000 EUR) med deset držav članic in Evropsko komisijo, kot določa sporazum proti tihotapljenju in ponarejanju cigaret.
He welcomes the plan agreed for the distribution of the payments of PMI (around EUR 800 000 000) among the 10 Member States and the European Commission as foreseen within the Anti-Contraband and Anti-Counterfeit Agreement.
Odločno podpira namero o uporabi dela sredstev Skupnosti (9,7 %) za boj proti tihotapljenju in ponarejanju cigaret.
He strongly supports the intention to use the Community share (9,7 %) to fight cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting.
Poleg tega poziva države članice, da denar porabijo na istem področju.
Furthermore, he calls on the Member States to make use of the money within the same subject field.
Pozdravlja dejstvo, da je sporazum podpisalo 24 držav članic, in vabi Veliko Britanijo, da prav tako podpre ta pomembni ukrep.
He welcomes the fact that 24 Member States have signed the agreement and would like to invite also the UK to support this important measure.
Pred začetkom porabe sredstev iz programa Herkul II je treba spremeniti nekaj pomembnih elementov pravne podlage.
Before the funds can be spent under Hercule II, some important adjustments of the legal basis have to be ensured.
Parlament je v resoluciji o programu Herkul I (kot tudi Evropsko računsko sodišče v mnenju o tem programu) pozval k natančnejši opredelitvi ciljev programa, če se bo ta po letu 2006 nadaljeval.
Parliament, in its resolution on Hercule I, as well as the European Court of Auditors in its respective opinion, had called for a clarification of the programme's objectives in case of a continuation after 2006.
Poročevalec obžaluje, da Komisija v svojem predlogu ni zastavila jasnih in tehnično dobro opredeljenih ciljev.
The rapporteur deplores that the Commission proposal does not set out clear, technically well-defined objectives.
Glede na povečanje sredstev iz proračuna in podaljšanje programskega obdobja naj bi s predlogi sprememb opredelili izmerljive cilje za izvajanje.
In view of the budget increase and the prolongation of the programming period, the amendments aim at setting measurable targets for the implementation.
Poleg tega poročevalec predlaga, da OLAF pripravlja letna poročila o doseženih rezultatih.
Furthermore, the rapporteur proposes that OLAF reports annually on the results achieved.
Prav tako meni, da bi moral biti neodvisni srednjeročni pregled pogoj za podaljšanje programskega obdobja.
He also considers an independent mid-term review to be a prerequisite for the prolongation of the programming period.
Poročevalec meni, da bi moral odbor natančno spremljati, ali se pri izvajanju programa Herkul II upoštevajo natančno določeni cilji, ki jih uvaja pravna podlaga.
In the rapporteur's view, the committee should closely monitor if the implementation of Hercule II follows the precise objectives to be introduced in the legal basis.
Poleg tega želi poudariti, da je zaradi zagotavljanja pregledne porabe sredstev v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka treba upoštevati načeli specifikacije in preglednosti , kot sta določeni v finančni uredbi.
In addition, he would like to point out that, within the annual budgetary procedure, the principles of specification and transparency in the financial regulation have to be respected in order to ensure a transparent way of spending.
Po pogajanjih s Svetom je bil dosežen dogovor, kar naj bi omogočilo sporazum že v prvi obravnavi.
Following negotiations with the Council a compromise was reached with a view to a first reading agreement.
o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembah in podaljšanju sklepa 804/2004/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o delovnem programu Skupnosti za spodbujanje dejavnosti na področju zaščite finančnih interesov Skupnosti (program Herkul II)
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending and extending Decision No 804/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 establishing a Community action programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the Community's financial interests (Hercule II programme)
Namen predloga je sprejeti temeljni akt v skladu s členom 49 finančne uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002.
The objective of this proposal is to constitute a basic act in accordance with Article 49 of the Financial Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002.
Dejavnosti Skupnosti v programu Herkul I so bile nedvomno uspešne in jih je treba nadaljevati.
There is no doubt that Community action within the "Hercule I" programme was a success and that it should be continued.
Predlagani sklep je zato nujno potreben in pristojni odbor si prizadeva doseči dogovor v prvi obravnavi, tako da bo lahko sklep začel veljati že 1. januarja 2007.
Therefore the proposed decision is urgently needed and the lead committee is trying to aim for an agreement in first reading which could allow entry into force of the decision in time for 1 January 2007.
Vendar pripravljavec mnenja ne razume, zakaj se je Komisija odločila za akt o spremembi, ki podaljšuje program Herkul I, namesto da bi razveljavila sklep št. 804/2004/ES in sprejela nov program za obdobje novega večletnega finančnega okvira.
But it is not clear to your draftsman why the Commission opted for the technique of an amending act extending the "Hercule I -programme" instead of repealing Decision No 804/2004/EC and adopting a new programme for the period of the new Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF).
V nasprotju z drugimi nadaljnjimi programi v obdobju novega večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013 Komisija v tem primeru ni predlagala sprejema novega pravnega akta, ki nadomešča in razveljavlja prejšnji akt.
Unlike what has been proposed by the Commission for other follow-up programmes covering the period 2007-2013 of the new MFF, the Commission does not propose to adopt a new legal act which replaces and repeals the earlier act.
Zdi se, da gre za kršitev točke 35 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje,
This seems to be an unfortunate infringement of Point 35 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making
Evropski parlament je bil pozvan, da v sodelovanju s sozakonodajalci izboljša kakovost priprave zakonodaje, zato je treba to vprašanje obravnavati v tem kontekstu, čeprav ne sodi med glavne pristojnosti Odbora za proračun.
The European Parliament is called upon, together with the other co-legislators, to improve the quality of law-making, therefore this issue has to be raised in this context, even if it is not the main area of competence of the Committee on Budgets.
Povrhu priloga k sklepu št. 804/2004/ES ne vsebuje samo manj pomembnih tehničnih določb, temveč te posegajo v bistvo programa, kar je v nasprotju s prizadevanji za dobro pripravo zakonodaje, k čemur so se zavezale tri institucije.
Furthermore, the annex to Decision No 804/2004/EC contains provisions which are not just minor technical ones but concern the core of the programme.
Prav tako je v nasprotju s skupnimi smernicami treh institucij, ki določajo, da se priloge k pravnim aktom uporabljajo za predstavitev določb ali delov določb, ločeno od besedila normativnega dela, zlasti zaradi njihove tehnične narave.
This is contrary to the good law-making efforts to which the three institutions are committed; it contradicts provisions of joint guidelines of the three institutions, which provide that annexes to legal acts shall be used as a means of presenting provisions or parts of provisions separately from the body of the enacting terms, in particular because of their technical nature
Skupna praktična navodila Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije za osebe, vključene v pripravo pravnih aktov v institucijah Skupnosti:
Joint Practical Guide of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission for persons involved in the drafting of legislation within the Community institutions:
http://intracomm.cec.eu-admin.net/sj/jurrev/gpc/en.pdf ; Primeri za določbe, ki so lahko del priloge: pravila, ki veljajo za uradnike (na primer metode analize, metode vzorčenja in predpisani obrazci), seznam izdelkov, preglednice, načrti in slike itd.
http://intracomm.cec.eu-admin.net/sj/jurrev/gpc/en.pdf ; Examples for provisions to be put in the annex might be: rules to be applied by civil servants (such as analysis techniques, sampling methods, and forms to be used), lists of products, tables of figures, plans and drawings etc. .
Pripravljavec mnenja zato predlaga nekaj predlogov sprememb, s katerimi bi se najpomembnejše določbe iz priloge prenesle v besedilo normativnega dela sklepa.
A set of amendments is therefore proposed by your draftsman in order to transfer the most important provisions from the annex to the body of the decision.
Finančne določbe
Financial provisions
Skupni referenčni znesek, predlagan za sedemletno programsko obdobje (proračunska vrstica 24 02 01 iz naslova „Boj proti goljufijam“), je 98.525.000 EUR.
The total reference amount proposed for the seven years of the duration of the programme (Budget line 24 02 01 under Title "Fight against Fraud) is EUR 98 525 000.
To pomeni povečanje v primerjavi s prejšnjim programom Herkul I, ki se je izvajal tri leta, od 2004 do 2006, s skupnimi finančnimi sredstvi v višini 11.800.000 EUR.
This means an increase compared to the previous "Hercule I "programme which covered a three-year period from 2004 until 2006, with a financial envelope of EUR 11 800 000 in total.
Odbor za proračun se je dogovoril o enotnem predlogu spremembe, ki ga predlaga pripravljavec mnenja (predlog spremembe 1), saj naj bi njegova vključitev v nove programe zagotovila skladnost z zgornjimi mejami večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013.
A standard amendment has been agreed by the Committee on Budgets to be introduced in the new programmes in order to ensure compliance with the ceilings of the MFF 2007 - 2013 and which your draftsman proposes to you (Amendment 1).
2012 in pozneje
2012 and later
Skupaj v milijonih EUR
Total in million EUR
Odobritve za prevzem obveznosti
Commitment Appropriations )
Podatki o izvajanju prejšnjega programa Herkul I v finančnih letih 2004, 2005 in 2006 potrjujejo uspešnost dejavnosti Skupnosti:
Looking at the figures of implementation of the predecessor programme "Hercule I" in the financial years 2004, 2005 and 2006, one can confirm the success of the Community action:
V milijonih EUR
EUR million
Opombe k vsebini predloga
Remarks on the content of the proposal
Spremembe sklepa št. 804/2004/ES se nanašajo na:
The amendments proposed to Decision No 804/2004/EC concern:
- dopolnitev sektorskih ciljev, na primer boj proti tihotapljenju in ponarejanju cigaret;
- the addition of sectoral objectives, such as the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting;
- črtanje donacij za poslovanje iz besedila programa (kar ne pomeni, da organi niso še naprej upravičeni do njih v skladu s členom 108(1) finančne uredbe);
- the removal of operating grants from the programme text (which does not mean that bodies do not continue to be eligible under Article 108(1) of the Financial Regulation);