natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Direktiva Sveta 93/37/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993 o usklajevanju postopkov oddaje javnih naročil za dela (UL L 199, 9.8.1993, str.
Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (OJ L 199, 9.8.1993, p.
54). o javnih trgih, direktiv 85/337/EGS
54). on public procurement, Directives 85/337/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 85/337/EGS z dne 27. junija 1985 o oceni posledic določenih javnih in zasebnih projektov za okolje (UL L 175, 5.7.1985, str.
Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
Direktiva Sveta 97/11/ES z dne 3. marca 1997 o spremembah direktive 85/337/EGS (UL L 73, 14.3.1997, str.
Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 73, 14.3.1997, p.
5). in 2001/42/ES
5). and 2001/42/EC
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/42/ES z dne 27. junija 2001 o oceni posledic določenih načrtov in programov za okolje (UL L 197, 21.7.2001, str.
Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p.
30). o ocenjevanju posledic za okolje in direktive 2000/60/ES
30). on environmental impact assessment, and Directive 2000/60/EC
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o okvirni politiki Skupnosti na področju voda (UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str.
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.
1). o vodni politiki,
1). on water policy,
– ob upoštevanju pravice do naslovitve peticije, ki jo predvidevata člena 21 in 194 Pogodbe EU,
– having regard to the right of petition as contained in Articles 21 and 194 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju peticij št. 609/2003, 732/2003, 985/2002, 1112/2002, 107/2004 in drugih peticij,
– having regard to Petitions 609/2003, 732/2003, 985/2002, 1112/2002, 107/2004 and others,
– ob upoštevanju člena 192(1) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 192(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0382/2005 )
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0382/2005 ),
B. ker je Odbor za peticije maja 2004 na to temo pripravil poročilo, v katerem je posebej izpostavil konkretne primere hudih kršitev človekovih pravic in zakonodaje Skupnosti,
B. whereas a report was drawn up by the Committee on Petitions on this subject in May 2004 setting out, in particular, specific cases illustrating serious and persistent violations of human rights and Community law,
C. ker je Odbor za peticije imenoval novo delegacijo, ki je dopolnila naloge prejšnje delegacije, delujoče maja 2004; nova delegacija je junija 2005 nadaljevala preiskave predvsem v Madridu in v regiji Valencija, da bi pridobila informacije in opravila pogovore z vpletenimi stranmi in glavnimi odgovornimi osebami,
C. whereas a new delegation appointed for a follow-up mission to that of May 2004 by the Committee on Petitions has continued the investigations carried out in particular in Madrid and in the region of Valencia in June 2005, in order to gather information and conduct interviews with the interested parties and key players,
D. ker so imeli člani delegacije na ta način možnost, da slišijo stališče vpletenih strani, med katerimi so:
D. whereas the members of the delegation thus had an opportunity to hear the parties concerned, including:
– državljani in osebe s prebivališčem v EU, ki so na Parlament naslovili peticijo, v kateri se pritožujejo nad sistematičnimi kršitvami njihovih pravic zaradi izvajanja zakona LRAU,
– the European citizens and residents who have petitioned Parliament alleging systematic violation of their rights as a result of the application of the LRAU,
– predsednik in pristojni ministri valencijske regionalne vlade, predsednik valencijskega parlamenta ( Cortes Valencianas ), vodje političnih skupin, valencijski varuh človekovih pravic ( Sindic de Greuges ) in nacionalni varuh človekovih pravic ( Defensor del Pueblo ), visoki predstavniki vlade v Madridu in Valenciji, združenje županov valencijske regije, predstavniki gradbenega sektorja in naročniki v sektorju nepremičnin, veleposlaniki držav članic in številne druge udeležene strani
– the president of the Valencian regional government and the responsible ministers, the president of the Valencian parliament (Cortes Valencianas) and the political group leaders, the Valencian ombudsman (Sindic de Greuges) and the national ombudsman (Defensor del Pueblo), senior government officials from Madrid and Valencia, the federation of mayors of the Valencian region, representatives of the construction industry and property developers, the ambassadors of the Member States and many other interested parties,
– in, navsezadnje, predstavniki Ustavnega sodišča in predsednik Sodišča v Valenciji, ki so pri sodelovanju brez izjeme pokazali odprtost in dobro voljo ter so bili zaradi svojega konstruktivnega pristopa deležni globokega odobravanja,
– and, lastly, representatives of the Constitutional Court and the president of the Court of Valencia who without exception cooperated with openness and goodwill, thus showing a spirit of constructive cooperation which is greatly appreciated,
E. ker so pristojnosti in odgovornosti, ki jih imajo pri tem vprašanju avtonomne regionalne oblasti kot tudi nacionalne oblasti, jasne in nesporne, in so zapisane v določbah španske ustave iz leta 1978, pri čemer se na omenjeno vprašanje še posebej nanašajo členi 10, 18, 33, 45, 47, 54, 93 in 105,
E. whereas the competence and responsibility of the autonomous regional authorities and of the Spanish national authorities are clear and recognised in this matter and that they are enshrined in the provisions of the Spanish Constitution of 1978 and, more particularly, for the matter under consideration, in Articles 10, 18, 33, 45, 47, 54, 93 and 105 thereof,
F. ker so evropske institucije dolžne spoštovati določbe Pogodb in zakonodaje, sprejete v skladu s Pogodbami, še posebej kar zadeva pravice in dolžnosti, povezane z državljanstvom EU, ter so tako v sodelovanju z državami članicami dolžne reševati težave, s katerimi se srečujejo državljani EU,
F. whereas the European institutions have the duty to enforce the provisions of the treaties and of the legislation adopted thereunder, having particular regard to the rights and obligations of European citizenship, and accordingly have a responsibility, in cooperation with the Member States, for resolving the problems affecting Europe’s citizens,
G. ker španska zakonodaja na področju zemljišč zagotavlja lastnikom zemljišč 90% gradbenih pravic, posebni zakon LRAU pa od lastnikov zahteva, da v primeru, ko lokalne oblasti odobrijo določen razvojni projekt, 10% gradbenih pravic brez možnosti odškodnine odstopijo občini kot "občinsko zemljo" ( Patrimonio Municipal Suelo ), poleg tega pa odstopijo tudi zemljo za morebitne poti, ceste, parkirišča, itd., javne površine in infrastrukturo, oziroma plačajo stroške razvojnega projekta, kot jih določi naročnik nove infrastrukture, pri čemer nima lastnik v postopku nobenega nadzora;
G. whereas current property law in Spain grants property owners 90 % of construction rights and the specific nature of the LRAU requires property owners, in the event of the approval of a land development project ( Plan de actuación integrada – PAI) by a local authority, to cede a minimum of 10 % of their property to the municipality as ‘Patrimonio Municipal Suelo’ (municipal land asset), together with the land for any paths, roads, car parks etc., public areas and public facilities, or pay development costs decided by the developer of that new infrastructure, a procedure over which the owner has no control,
H. ker je očitno, da je bila pri takem urbanističnem postopku določenim lastnikom storjena krivica, kar je razvidno iz peticij kakor tudi obiskov na terenu, in ker to priznavajo tudi lokalne oblasti, valencijska vlada pa pripravlja nov zakon, s katerim bi se izognili odstopanjem v sedanjem zakonu,
H. whereas it is plain that some property owners have in fact been harmed by this process of land development, which is apparent both from the petitions and on the ground, and whereas these facts are recognised by all the local authorities and the Valencian government is consequently preparing a new law in order to avoid the excesses in the application of the previous one,
I. ker se glavne pritožbe nanašajo na nekatere krivične primere načinov razlastitve, ko je bilo po mnenju prizadetih zemljišče prenizko ocenjeno, da bi se lahko kasneje ponovno prodalo po višji tržni ceni, in to ob takšnem obveščanju, ki prizadetim ni omogočalo odziva, zaradi česar je v zelo številnih primerih nastala materialna in moralna škoda,
I. whereas the main grievances concern the sometimes one-sided methods of expropriation employing extremely low valuations, in the opinion of the interested parties with subsequent resale at a high market price and information arrangements that do not allow interested parties to respond, all adding up to material loss and mental suffering in very many cases,
J. ker pomanjkanje preglednosti in predhodno določenih jasnih kriterijev kaže na to, da postopki dodelitve poslov niso v skladu z evropskim pravom, kar je spodbudilo Evropsko komisijo k naslovitvi uradnega opomina Španiji, in ker o pomanjkljivosti zakona in njegovega izvajanja priča število dokazanih oziroma za sedaj domnevnih primerov korupcije,
J. whereas the lack of transparency and of clear preset criteria makes it apparent that the methods for awarding contracts are not in conformity with European law, which has led the European Commission to send a Letter of Formal Notice to Spain, and whereas the number of cases in which corruption has been determined or is currently alleged highlight the deficiencies of the law and its application,
K. ker so poglavitni problemi, ki izhajajo iz izvajanja zakona LRAU, povezani z vlogo "urbanista" ( urbanizador ), neustreznimi sredstvi za določanje in objavo razpisanih poslov, nezadostnim obveščanjem lastnikov zemljišč, pomanjkanjem jasnih opredelitev javnega interesa in ustreznih odškodnin, torej z vprašanji, pri katerih mora biti zakonodaja še posebej v skladu z zahtevami iz sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice,
K. whereas the main problems arising from the application of the LRAU concern the role of the ‘urbanisator’, the inadequate means of determination and publication of contracts to be awarded, insufficient notification to landowners and the lack of clear definitions of public interest and adequate compensation, issues in which the law needs to conform, inter alia, with the requirements laid down by the case-law of the Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR),
L. ker uradna razglasitev Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah in izjave predsednikov evropskih institucij o spoštovanju Listine s strani institucij dajejo državljanom vedeti, da lahko v luči sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije (glej npr. sodbo Sodišča EU z dne 19. julija 1999
L. whereas the solemn proclamation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the declarations by the Presidents of the European institutions that those institutions will respect the Charter mean, in the light of the case-law of the Court of Justice (see, for instance, the judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 July 1999
M. ker morajo države članice pri izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti oziroma v primerih, ko so to zakonodajo dolžne izvesti, spoštovati Listino, če so njene določbe za to zakonodajo relevantne; ker obstaja tesna povezava med postopkom dodeljevanje poslov in načini razlastitve premoženja ter določitve pripadajočih odškodnin,
M. whereas Member States are obliged to respect the Charter when they apply, or are obliged to apply, Community law in situations in which the provisions of the Charter become relevant; whereas there is a close link between, on the one hand, the method for awarding contracts and, on the other hand, the modalities for expropriation of property and of determining the compensation therefor,
Zadeva Aka proti Turčiji , Zbirka sodb in odločb, 1998-VI, zvezek 90. ) "... najti "ustrezno ravnotežje" med javnim interesom skupnosti in temeljnimi pravicami oseb, ki so ostale brez lastnine",
90). ) requires that ‘a “fair balance” be struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the fundamental rights of persons whose property has been expropriated’,
O. ker imajo določeni urbanistični načrti očitno pogubne posledice za okolje in ekologijo številnih obalnih območij ter zlasti za bodočo preskrbo z vodo, ki Evropsko unijo še posebej skrbi,
O. whereas some land development plans seem to have a disastrous impact on the environment and the ecology of many coastal zones and, more particularly, on the future conditions for the supply of water, which is a subject of concern to the European Union,
P. ker je v Direktivi 2001/42/ES zahteva, da je treba pri oblikovanju vseh načrtov in programov, še posebej v zvezi z "ruralno, mestno in turistično ureditvijo in uporabo tal", ki bi lahko imeli hude posledice za okolje, izvesti strateško presojo vplivov in določiti okvir za prihodnje sporazume o razvojnih projektih, povzetih v Prilogah I in II Direktive 85/337/EGS,
P. whereas Directive 2001/42/EC requires a strategic environmental impact assessment to be carried out for all plans and programmes which are prepared, inter alia, for ‘tourism, town and country planning or land use’ and are likely to have significant environmental effects and which set the framework for future development consents of projects listed in Annex I and II to Directive 85/337/EEC,
Q. ker Direktiva 2000/60/ES, ki določa okvir za ukrepe na področju vodne politike, od držav članic zahteva še zlasti, da preprečijo poslabšanje stanja "celinskih površinskih voda, somornic, obalnih in podzemnih voda" ter zagotovijo usklajeno politiko glede "porečja v celoti",
Q. whereas Directive 2000/60/EC laying down a framework for water policy requires the Member States, inter alia, to prevent the deterioration of ‘inland surface waters, transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater’ and obliges them to ensure a coordinated policy with respect to the ‘whole of a river basin’,
R. ker je uprava porečja reke Jucar ( Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar ) izrazila nasprotovanje vsaj 30 novim urbanističnim projektom v Valenciji in ker je Komisija Španiji zaradi neustreznega izvajanja okvirne direktive o vodah poslala obrazloženo mnenje,
R. whereas the Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar has objected to at least 30 new urbanisations in Valencia and the Commission has sent a reasoned opinion to Spain due to inadequate implementation of the Water Framework Directive,
S. ker o nujnosti preudarne in objektivne obravnave vseh temeljnih nerešenih vprašanj priča dejstvo, da so vsa ta vprašanja in dogodki postali predmet političnih razprav na vseh ravneh,
S. whereas the fact that all these issues and all these events have become a subject of political debate at all levels further emphasises the need for prudent and objective consideration of all of the key questions of disagreement,
2. meni, da so med glavnimi problemi, na katere opozarjajo državljani, zlasti zlorabe pri izvajanju določil iz zakona LRAU s strani vpletenih v procesu urbanizacije, ter način upravljanja pristojnih javnih oblasti, predvsem nekaterih županov in vlade avtonomne regije Valencija;
Considers that the main problems raised by citizens have focused on the improper application of the LRAU by those involved in the urban development process and on the administration by competent public authorities, in particular certain local authorities and the Government of the Community of Valencia;
4. vzpodbuja prizadevanja avtonomne regije Valencija, da bi pospešila iskanje rešitve težave, s čimer prepričljivo dokazuje svoj interes za državljane;
Encourages the autonomous region of Valencia in its efforts to resolve the problem more quickly than was hitherto the case as genuine evidence of its concern for the public;
6. z namenom rešiti težave, ki jih za zaščito pravice do lastnine predstavlja trenutno veljavna zakonodaja, saj sproža vprašanja človekovih in temeljnih pravic, kot tudi težave v odnosu do zakonodaje Skupnosti o javnih naročilih, poziva pristojne organe, da upoštevajo naslednje pobude:
Invites the competent authorities to take account of the following suggestions, to remedy the problems that have arisen under the present legislation with respect to those aspects of the protection of property rights which raise questions of human and fundamental rights, and with respect to Community law on public procurement:
– v nov zakon naj se vključi jasna opredelitev javnega interesa, s katero bo pri razlastitvah nedvoumno onemogočena uporaba "javnega interesa" - ki je v skladu z evropskimi merili človekovih in temeljnih pravic predhodni pogoj za kakršno koli razlastitev - kot utemeljitve v korist bolj zasebnega kot javnega interesa,
– the inclusion in the new law of a clear definition of public interest which unambiguously prevents the possibility that the ‘public interest’ justification for expropriation – which is a precondition for any expropriation under European human and fundamental rights norms – could be used for the promotion of private, rather than public, interests,
– na podlagi v sodni praksi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice priznanih standardov in načel naj se oblikujejo zavezujoča merila za izračun odškodnin v primeru razlastitev,
– the establishment of binding criteria for the calculation of compensation in cases of expropriation on the basis of the standards and principles recognised by the case-law of the ECJ and ECHR,
– temeljito naj se ponovno preučijo merila za izbiro "urbanista" ter tudi postopek dodeljevanja poslov izbranemu "urbanistu", da bi se ta funkcija uskladila z evropsko zakonodajo, saj trenutne okoliščine vzbujajo resen dvom, o čemer priča potekajoč postopek ugotavljanja kršitve; na ta način bi se okrepila preglednost postopka dodeljevanja javnih naročil in se zagotovilo varovanje pravice do zasebne lastnine evropskih državljanov,
– fundamental review of the bases for selecting the ‘urbanisator’, and of the procedure for awarding public contracts to the ‘urbanisator’ selected, to ensure that this office is compatible with European law, given the existence of serious doubts on this subject as evidenced by the current infringement proceedings, so as to enhance the transparency of the procedure for awarding public contracts and safeguard the property rights of European citizens,
7. poziva pristojne valencijske in španske oblasti, da zagotovijo, da so v skladu z Direktivo 2001/42/ES splošni razvojni in urbanistični načrti, ki bi lahko imeli občutne posledice za okolje in s katerimi se določa okvir za prihodnje sporazume o razvoju projektov, predmet strateške presoje vplivov na okolje;
Calls upon the competent Valencian and Spanish authorities to ensure, through binding norms, that general plans for development and urbanisation which are likely to have significant environmental effects and which set the framework for future development consent of projects are made subject to a strategic environmental impact assessment pursuant to Directive 2001/42/EC;
10. odločno vztraja pri zahtevi za ustanovitev urada za pritožbe pod pristojnostjo lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti, ki bo omogočila administrativno pomoč posameznikom, oškodovanim zaradi zakona LRAU, tako da se jim bo posredovalo potrebne podatke o morebitnih pravnih sredstvih;
Insists that claims offices be set up, under the responsibility of the local authorities and regional government, to provide assistance for people affected by the LRAU in administrative terms, supplying them with all the information required to enable them to consider the advisability of any legal action;
14. zahteva, da Komisija nadaljuje svoje preiskave in natančen nadzor, da bi zagotovila skladnost z novo zakonodajo in njenim izvajanjem z zakonodajo Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil ter z njimi povezanimi področji, ter da Odbor za peticije obvešča o razvoju dogodkov v tej zadevi;
Demands that the Commission continue careful monitoring and investigation to ensure the conformity of the new LUV legislation and its application with Community law in the area of public procurement and related fields and keep the Petitions Committee fully informed as to developments in this regard;
18. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj posreduje to resolucijo Svetu in Komisiji ter vladi in parlamentu avtonomne regije Valencija, varuhu človekovih pravic avtonomne regije Valencija (Sindic de Greuges), španski vladi in podpisnikom peticije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the government and parliament of the Valencia autonomous region, the Sindic of Greuges of the Valencia autonomous region, the Spanish Government and the petitioners.
Obtožbe glede zlorabe zakona o lastništvu zemljišč v Valenciji oziroma Zakona o izvajanju gradbenih določil ( LRAU-Ley reguladora de la actividad urbanística ) in posledicah za državljane EU (peticije št. 609/2003, 732/2003, 985/2002, 1112/2002, 107/2004 in druge peticije)
The alleged abuse of the Valencian Land Law known as the LRAU and its effect on European citizens (Petitions 609/2003, 732/2003, 985/2002, 1112/2002, 107/2004 and others)
člen 192 (1)
Rule 192(1)
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitute present for the final vote
o okoljskih vidikih trajnostnega razvoja
on the environmental aspects of sustainable development
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.....................................................2
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...............................................3
EXPOSÉ DES MOTIFS..............................................................................................................2
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................13
MNENJE ODBORA ZA ZAPOSLOVANJE IN SOCIALNE ZADEVE....................................2
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS..............17
- ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 31. maja 2001 o okoljski politiki in trajnostnem razvoju: priprava na Evropski svet v Göteborgu
– having regard to its resolution of 31 May 2001 on environment policy and sustainable development: preparing for the Gothenburg European Council,
UL C 47 E, 21.2.2002, str.
OJ C 47 E, 21.2.2002, p.
- ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 28. februarja 2002 o strategiji trajnostnega razvoja pred Evropskim svetom v Barceloni
– having regard to its resolution of 28 February 2002 on the sustainable development strategy for the Barcelona Summit,
UL C 293 E, 28.11.2002, str.
OJ C 293 E, 28.11.2002, p.
- ob upoštevanju resolucij z dne 16. maja 2002 pred pripravo svetovnega vrha o trajnostnem razvoju leta 2002
– having regard to its resolutions of 16 May 2002 in preparation for the world summit on sustainable development in 2002,
- ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z naslovom "Vključevanje okoljskih vprašanj v sektorske politike - pregled stanja cardifskega procesa ( KOM(2004)0394 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document entitled ‘Integrating environmental considerations into other policy areas – a stocktaking of the Cardiff process’ ( COM(2004)0394 ),
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Pregled 2005 Strategije trajnostnega razvoja EU: začetne ocene in prihodnje usmeritve" ( KOM(2005)0037 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘The 2005 Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy: Initial Stocktaking and Future Orientations’ ( COM(2005)0037 ),