natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Izredni Evropski svet iz Luxembourga je, kot je znano, novembra 1997 določil ambiciozno strategijo za zmanjševanje brezposelnosti ter doseganje trajne rasti zaposlitve in hkrati zmanjševanje razlik med spoloma.
As is well known, the extraordinary European Council held in Luxembourg in November 1997 established an ambitious strategy for cutting unemployment and achieving a sustainable rise in employment rates while also reducing gender inequalities.
Marca 2000 so bili na vrhu v Lizboni določeni cilji polne zaposlenosti z več in boljšimi zaposlitvami.
In March 2000, the Lisbon summit defined the objective of full employment with more and better jobs.
Za leto 2010 so določeni naslednji cilji:
The following objectives were established for 2010:
– 70 % za skupno stopnjo zaposlenosti,
- 70% for the overall employment rate;
– 60 % za stopnjo zaposlenosti žensk.
- 60% for the female employment rate.
Spomladi 2001 je Evropski svet v Stockholmu določil cilje stopnje zaposlenosti na 55 % za osebe med 55 in 64 letom starosti.
In spring 2001 the Stockholm European Council set the objective of a 55% employment rate for those aged between 55 and 64.
Dejstvo je, da v letu 2003 skupna stopnja zaposlenosti, vključno z negotovimi zaposlitvami in zaposlitvami za skrajšani delovni čas ni presegla 62,9 % v EU-25.
The fact is, however, that in 2003 the overall employment rate, including insecure and part-time employment, was no higher than 62.9% in the EU-25.
Delitev po spolih kaže, da je stopnja zaposlenosti žensk le 55 % in da velik del tega predstavljajo negotove zaposlitve in zaposlitve za skrajšani delovni čas.
The gender breakdown indicates that the female employment rate was only 55%, and a large proportion of that was insecure and part-time work.
Stopnja zaposlenosti moških je 71 %.
The male employment rate was 71%.
Jasno je, da obstajajo na trgu delovne sile resne neenakosti.
It is clear that severe inequalities persist on the labour market.
– Nesprejemljivi delovni pogoji za nekatere poklice v več državah članicah povzročajo bolezni in vodijo k večjemu številu delovnih nesreč (čeprav številke že od leta 1994 padajo).
- The unacceptable working conditions in certain occupations in a number of Member States are causing illness and lead to a large number of workplace accidents (though figures have been falling since 1994).
Leta 2000 je bilo zaradi delovnih nesreč (150 milijonov dni) ali zdravstvenih težav, povezanih z delom (350 milijonov dni) izgubljenih skoraj 500 milijonov delovnih dni.
In 2000, almost 500 m working days were lost owing to workplace accidents (150 m days) or work-related health problems (350 m days).
– Leta 2001 je bilo 3,8 % delavcev udeleženih v delovnih nesrečah, katerih posledica so bili vsaj trije delovni dnevi odsotnosti z dela (stopnja odsotnosti za tri dni ali manj je bilo 6,1 %).
- In 2001, 3.8% of workers in the EU were the victims of workplace accidents involving more than three working days' absence from work (the figure for absences of three days or less was 6.1%).
V nekaterih država članicah je povprečje bistveno višje (Latvija, Belgija, Litva, Estonija, Portugalska, Švedska in VB).
In some Member States the average rate was far higher (Latvia, Belgium, Lithuania, Estonia, Portugal, Sweden and the UK).
Iz zgoraj naštetega je jasno, da strategije za višjo zaposlenost ne zadostujejo.
It is clear from the above that the strategies for higher employment are not sufficing.
Z nominalnim konvergenčnim merilom je bila omogočena prednost stabilnosti cen.
Priority has been given to price stability via the nominal convergence criteria.
Zato je nujno potrebno uvesti drugo strategijo, in sicer v obliki Pakta za razvoj in zaposlovanje, ki bi dal prednost ustvarjanju bolj kakovostnih delovnih mest, ob upoštevanju pravic delavcev.
It is therefore necessary to introduce a different strategy, in the form of a Pact for Development and Employment which would give priority to creating more quality jobs accompanied by workers' rights.
Prav tako je treba potrebno uvesti ukrepe, ki bi določali omejitve pri združevanjih in selitvah multinacionalk, podporo proizvodnem sektorju in mikropodjetjem ter malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, podporo boju proti diskriminaciji ter zmanjševanju delovnega časa brez zmanjševanja plače, zato da bi olajševali ustvarjanje delovnih mest, usklajevanje družinskega življenja in službe ter podporo zagotavljanju vseživljenjskega izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter spodbujanju civilnega in socialnega partnerstva v življenju Skupnosti.
Measures are also needed to set limits on mergers and relocations of multinationals, support productive sectors and micro-businesses and SMEs, promote equality, fight discrimination, and cut working hours without loss of pay, in order to facilitate job creation, reconcile work with family life, ensure lifelong education and training and promote civic and social participation in community life.
Višina plače in najnižja plača
Wage levels and the minimum wage
18 od 25 držav članic izplačuje najnižjo plačo (Belgija, Češka, Estonija, Grčija, Španija, Francija, Irska, Latvija, Litva, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Malta, Nizozemska, Poljska, Portugalska, Slovenija, Slovaška in VB).
18 of the 25 Member States have a minimum wage (Belgium, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia and the UK).
– 1. januarja se je raven najnižje plače spreminjala od 121 EUR na mesec v Latviji, prek 498 EUR v Portugalski do 1403 EUR v Luxembourgu.
- As at 1 January 2004 its level varied from EUR 121 per month in Latvia, through 498 in Portugal to 1403 in Luxembourg.
– Primerjava kazalcev cen na podlagi paritete kupne moči (PPP) je pokazala manjše neenakosti, kar spreminja razvrstitev držav: v smislu paritete kupne moči imata Malta in Slovenija višjo najnižjo plačo kot Poljska in Španija.
- Comparison ironing out the price factor on the basis of purchasing-power parity (PPP) reveals some minor inequalities and slightly modifies the league table: in PPP terms, Malta and Slovenia have higher minimum wages than Portugal and Spain.
– Odstotek oseb, zaposlenih za polni delovni čas, ki prejemajo najnižjo plačo je zelo različen: od 0,8 % v Španiji in prek 1,9 % v VB in do 14 % Franciji, 15,1 % v Luksemburgu in 15,4 % v Litvi.
- The percentage of full-time workers receiving the minimum wage varies considerably: from 0.8% in Spain through 1.9% in the UK to 14% in France, 15.1% in Luxembourg and 15.4% in Lithuania.
Na splošno je v tem položaju več žensk kot pa moških.
In general, more women than men are in this situation.
– Razlika med najnižjo plačo in povprečno mesečno plačo v industriji in storitvah je bila v letu 2002 od 32 % v Slovaški, prek 43 % v Portugalski in 49 % na Nizozemskem do 54 % v Malti.
- The ratio between the minimum wage and the average monthly wage in industry and services varied in 2002 from 32% in Slovakia, through 43% in Portugal and 49% in the Netherlands, to 54% in Malta.
– Razlike v plačah na podlagi spola so EU-25 še vedno zelo razširjene.
- Wage discrimination on the basis of gender is still rife in the EU-25.
Primerjava je zato otežena, vendar je bila v letu 2001 v EU-15 povprečna bruto urna postavka za ženske za 16 % nižja kot pa za moške, čeprav je bila v nekaterih državah članicah, zlasti v Nemčiji in VB višja.
Comparison remains difficult, but in 2001, in the EU-15, average gross hourly pay was 16% less for women than for men, although in some Member States, notably Germany and the UK, it was higher.
Za nove države članice kažejo podatki, ki so na voljo, na velike razlike med državami, med njima pa najbolj izstopata Češka in Estonija.
For the new Member States, the data available indicate significant variations between countries, the most deserving cases being the Czech Republic and Estonia.
Če želimo te razlike med plačami odpraviti, je treba ustaviti tako neposredno diskriminacijo na podlagi osnovne plače kot tudi neposredno diskriminacijo povezano z ekonomskim sodelovanjem, izbiro poklica in s kariernim napredovanjem.
If these wage inequalities are to be ended, it will be necessarily to stop both direct discrimination over basic wages and indirect discrimination related to participation in the economy, choice of occupation and career progress.
Dohodek – BDP na prebivalca
Income - GDP per inhabitant
Zneski BDP na prebivalca, na osnovi standarda kupne moči (SKM), glede na podatke Eurostata
According to Eurostat
Eurostat 37/2004, Economy and Finance , v letu 2003, in ukrepi za standardizacijo kupne moči z različnimi valutami, ki bi omogočili primerjavo med državami, so prikazali velike razlike med državami članicami, in sicer:
Eurostat 37/2004, Economy and Finance , the figures for GDP per inhabitant in 2003, based on PPS (purchasing power standard), a measure intended to standardise the purchasing power of the different currencies so as to permit comparisons between countries, exhibited major variations between Member States, as follows:
– 50 % ali manj od povprečja EU-25: v Latviji, Estoniji, Litvi in Poljski
- 50% or less of the EU-25 average: Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and Poland.
– 51–75 % ali manj od povprečja EU-25: na Češkem, Madžarskem, Malti, Portugalskem in Slovaškem.
- 51-75% of the EU-25 average: Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Portugal and Slovakia.
– 76–100 % ali manj od povprečja EU-25: na Cipru, v Grčiji, Španiji in Sloveniji.
- 76-100% of the EU-25 average: Cyprus, Greece, Spain and Slovenia.
– 101–125 % ali manj od povprečja EU-25: v Avstriji, Belgiji, Nemčiji, na Danskem, Finskem, v Franciji, Italiji, na Nizozemskem, Švedskem in v VB.
- 101-125% of the EU-25 average: Austria, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK.
– 126 % ali manj od povprečja EU-25: na Irski in v Luksemburgu.
- 126% or more of the EU-25 average: Ireland and Luxembourg.
Te številke kažejo na velike razlike v razvojnih ravneh med državami članicami in tako jasno dokazujejo, da še zdaleč nismo dosegli položaja ekonomske in socialne kohezije, ki je naveden tudi v Pogodbi.
These figures point up the major variations in development level among the Member States, making it clear that we are far from having achieved the economic and social cohesion of which the Treaty speaks.
Tej težavi problemu je nujno posvetiti več pozornosti, in sicer z makroekonomskimi politikami ter s povečanjem skladov Skupnosti, zlasti Kohezijskega sklada in strukturnega sklada; to je pomembno še zlasti sedaj, ko so se začela pogajanja o finančni perspektivi.
It is essential to pay much more attention to this problem, via macroeconomic policy and an increase in the Community funds, notably the Cohesion Fund and the Structural Funds; this is of particular importance now that the negotiations on the financial perspective have begun.
Revščina in socialna izključenost
Poverty and social exclusion
Eurostatove zadnje objave
Eurostat's recent publications
Eurostat št.10 in 16/2004, Prebivalstvo in socialni pogoji o prebivalstvu in socialnih pogojih, ki temeljijo na merilih in 18 splošnih kazalcih, ki jih je določil Evropski svet v Laeknu decembra 2001, in ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Nici decembra 2000 o boju proti revščini in socialni izključenosti, kot jih je določil Evropski svet v Lizboni marca 2000, kažejo, da je treba z uporabo izvajati odprte metode koordiniranja in dati prednost državnim zaposlitvenim načrtom ter tako omogočiti sklepanje določenih zaključkov, četudi na podlagi informacij, ki niso posodobljene.
Eurostat 10 and 16/2004, Population and Social Conditions on population and social conditions, based on the criteria and the 18 common indicators defined by the Laeken European Council in December 2001 and taking account of the decisions of the Nice European Council of December 2000 to the effect that the fight against poverty and social exclusion as defined by the Lisbon European Council of March 2000 should be pursued using the open coordination method and giving priority to the national employment plans, make it possible to draw certain conclusions, albeit on the basis of information that is not up-to-date.
Publikacija Komisije z naslovom „Socialni položaj v Evropski uniji – 2004“ vključuje v analizi tudi deset novih članic, in sicer na podlagi informacij Eurostata
The Commission's publication 'The social situation in the European Union - 2004' includes the ten new Member States in its analysis, on the basis of information provided by Eurostat
Letno poročilo Eurostata za leto 2004. .
Eurostat Yearbook 2004. .
– Leta 2001 je bilo na pragu revščine približno 15 % prebivalstva EU
- In 2001, approximately 15% of the population of the EU was at risk of poverty
O Prag relativne revščine ustreza odstotku oseb, ki živijo z manj kot 60 % povprečnega nacionalnega dohodka: z drugimi besedami, dejanski osnovni dohodek je zelo različen. – ta odstotek pomeni v resnici 70 milijonov oseb.
The relative poverty threshold corresponds to the percentage living on less than 60% of average national income: in other words, the actual basic income presupposed varies widely. - a percentage equivalent to 70 m people.
Številke za Grčijo in Portugalsko so bile celo 20 %, za Irsko pa 21 %.
The figures for Greece and Portugal were as high as 20%, and that for Ireland was 21%.
Vendar se opredelitev ravni dohodka za izračun 60 % nacionalnega povprečja med državami članicami zelo razlikuje, kar je bilo jasno izraženo že v debati o najnižji plači in porazdelitvi dohodka.
However, the definition of the income level for calculating 60% of the national median varies considerably between Member States, as has already been made clear in our discussion above of minimum wages and income distribution.
– Socialno skrbstvo in socialna varnost sta nujna za zmanjševanje praga revščine.
- Welfare and social security benefits are vital to reduce the risk of poverty.
Brez različnih socialnih transferjev, vključno s pokojninami in drugimi vrstami podpore, bi bilo na pragu revščine 30 % prebivalstva na Finskem, 37 % na Portugalskem, 40 %v Franciji in VB ter 42 % v Italiji.
Without the various social transfers, including pensions and other forms of support, the risk of poverty would affect 30% of the population in Finland, 37% in Portugal, 40% in France and the UK and 42% in Italy.
To poudarja pomembnost socialnega skrbstva in politike sociale varnosti.
This points up the importance of welfare and social security policy.
– Porazdelitev socialnega skrbstva je med državami članicami zelo različna.
- The distribution of welfare varies greatly between Member States.
V EU-15 je leta 2001 na Portugalskem znašala 3644 enote PPP (najnižja vrednost), v Luksemburgu pa 10.559 (najvišja vrednost).
In the EU-15 in 2001, it varied from 3 644 PPP units in Portugal (the lowest value) to 10 559 in Luxembourg (the highest).
– Za porazdelitev dohodka so značilne tudi znatne neenakosti, tako med skupinami prebivalstva kot tudi med državami članicami.
- Income distribution is also marked by very considerable inequalities, between population groups and between Member States.
Leta 2001 je 20 % prebivalstva z najvišjim dohodkom živelo vsaj petkrat bolje kot pa 20 % prebivalstva z najnižjim dohodkom.
In 2001, the 20% of the population with the highest income was almost five times better-off than the 20% with the lowest income.
Ta kazalec se spreminja od 3 % na Danskem do 6,5 % na Portugalskem.
This indicator varied from 3% in Denmark to 6.5% in Portugal.
– Visok odstotek prebivalstva živi v brezposelnem gospodinjstvu
- A high percentage of the population lives in an unemployed household
Opredelitev gospodinjstva, v katerem so brezposelni vsi člani, otroci in študenti do 24. leta starosti so izvzeti. .
The definition of a household as having all its members unemployed does not, obviously, take account of schoolchildren or students up to age 24. .
Leta 2003 je v EU-15 približno 10 % oseb med 18 in 59 letom starosti živelo v gospodinjstvu, v katerem so bili vsi člani brezposelni.
In 2003 in the EU-15 some 10% of those aged between 18 and 59 were living in a household where no-one had a job.
Z dvigovanjem stopnje brezposelnosti v zadnjih letih in z odpravo ugodnosti v nekaterih državah članicah sta postali revščina in socialna izključenost resna težava z večjimi razsežnostmi, kot pa je navedeno v zgoraj omenjenih podatkih.
With the rise in unemployment in recent years and benefit cuts in some Member States, poverty and social exclusion are now in reality probably even more widespread than the above statistics suggest.
To poudarja potrebo po integraciji socialne vključenosti v politike Skupnosti, zlasti monetarne politike in politike notranjega trga, zato da bi določili koncept kvalitetnih javnih storitev in hkrati določili prednosti javnih naložb na področjih, kot so zdravstvo, izobraževanje in usposabljanje, nastanitev, socialno skrbstvo, dostop do pravnega sistema, kulturnih dejavnosti in dejavnosti v prostem času ipd.
This points to the need to mainstream social inclusion within the Community's policies, especially monetary policy and internal market policy, with a view to defending the concept of quality public services while prioritising public investment in such social fields as health, education and training, housing, welfare, access to the legal system, culture and leisure activities, etc.
Obstaja splošen sporazum o pomembni vlogi izobraževanja, usposabljanja, vseživljenjskega učenja in raziskovalne dejavnosti.
There is general agreement on the importance of education, training, lifelong learning and research.
Vendar znatne neenakosti in neskončne nepravilnosti kažejo, da imela osvetlitev problema na vrhu v Lizboni leta 2000 le majhen učinek.
Nonetheless, deep inequalities and endless inadequacies persist, showing that the stress laid on the matter by the Lisbon summit in 2000 has had little effect.
Iz zadnjih podatkov je razvidno, da ostaja v nekaterih državah članicah položaj še vedno ostaja zelo resen, čeprav Komisija poudarja potrebo po prednostnih dejavnostih za zmanjševanje ravni osipa in neuspeha:
It appears from recent statistics that, although the Commission has emphasised the need to prioritise action to reduce drop-out and failure rates, the situation remains grave in some Member States:
Nasprotno je bila raven osipa na Slovaškem, Češkem in Poljskem le od 4,9 do 6,3 %.
By contrast, in Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Poland the drop-out rate was only 4.9-6.3%.
– Na področju vseživljenjskega učenja in usposabljanja prav tako obstajajo velike razlike.
- There are also major variations as regards lifelong education and training.
Na Švedskem je v letu 2003 34,2 % oseb med 25 in 64 letom starosti sodelovalo pri izobraževanju ali usposabljanju: Na Portugalskem je tako sodelovalo le 3,6 % oseb, to pa je tudi država članica z najvišjo stopnjo osipa.
In Sweden in 2003, 34.2% of those aged between 25 and 64 had followed education or training courses: the equivalent figure for Portugal was a mere 3.6%, and this in the Member State with the highest school drop-out rate.
Za spremembo tega položaja je treba uvesti ukrepe, prednost pa dodeliti usposabljanju in vseživljenjskemu izobraževanju.
Measures must be taken to change this situation, with priority being given to education, training and lifelong learning.
Socialni položaj v Evropski uniji
The social situation in the European Union
Pristojni odbor Datum razglasitve dovoljenja na zasedanju
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary
Odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary
Odbori, ki niso podali mnenja Datum sklepa
Not delivering opinions Date of decision
Poročevalec Datum imenovanja
Rapporteur Date appointed
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o kakovosti kazenskega sodstva in usklajenosti kazenske zakonodaje v državah članicah
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the quality of criminal justice and the harmonisation of criminal law in the Member States
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA SVETU....................................3
TO THE COUNCIL....................................................................................................................3
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA SVETU GLEDE KAKOVOSTI KAZENSKEGA SODSTVA EVROPSKE UNIJE B6‑0234/2004 15
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL ON THE QUALITY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION B6-0234/2004 16
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA SVETU
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECOMMENDATION
- ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga predlaga António Costa v imenu skupine PSE o kakovosti kazenskega sodstva Evropske unije( B6‑0234/2004 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by António Costa, on behalf of the PSE Group, on the quality of criminal justice in the European Union ( B6‑0234/2004 ),
- ob upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije človekovih pravic, ki jo je sprejela Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov v svoji resoluciji 217 A (III) 10. decembra 1948, in še posebej njenih členov 7, 8, 9 10 in 11,
– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in its resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948, and in particular Articles 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 thereof,
- ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah, ki ga je tudi sprejela Generalna skupščina v svoji resoluciji 2200 A (XXI) 16. decembra 1966 in je stopil v veljavo 23. marca 1976, ter še posebej njegovih členov 2, 7, 9, 10 in 14,
– having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in its resolution 2200 A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, which entered into force on 23 March 1976, and in particular Articles 2, 7, 9, 10 and 14 thereof,
- ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin z dne 4. novembra 1950 (ECHR), ki je stopila v veljavo 3. septembra 1953, in še posebej njenih členov 6 in 13,
– having regard to the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950 (ECHR), which entered into force on 3 September 1953, and in particular Articles 6 and 13 thereof,
- ob upoštevanju naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in še posebej njenih členov 29, 31(1(c)) in 34(2(a) in (b),
– having regard to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 29, 31(1)(c) and 34(2)(a) and (b),
- ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo, ki so jo države članice podpisale v Rimu dne 29. oktobra 2004, še posebej njenih členov I-42 in III-260 (mehanizmi ocenjevanja), III-270 in III-271 (pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah) ter od II-107 do II-110, ki povzemajo člene od 47 do 50 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, signed by the Member States in Rome on 29 October 2004, and in particular Articles I-42 and III-260 (evaluation mechanisms), III-270 and III-271 (judicial cooperation in criminal matters), and II-107 to II-110, which take over the provisions of Articles 47 to 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
- ob upoštevanju pravnega reda Skupnosti na področju kazenskega sodstva, še posebej Konvencije o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah
– having regard to the Community ‘acquis’ in the field of criminal justice, in particular the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters
Sklep Sveta z dne 29. maja 2000 v skladu s členom 34 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, Konvencija o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah držav članic Evropske unije (UL C 197 z dne 12.7.2000, str.
Council Act of 29 May 2000 establishing in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (OJ C 197, 12.7.2000, p.
1). , okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem pripornem nalogu in postopkih izročitve med državami članicami
1). , the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States
UL L 190, 18.07.02, str.
OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p.