natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Svet za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose je oktobra tudi zahteval oblikovanje skupne strategije EU o pomoči za trgovino do pomladi 2007, kjer bi bil začrtan časovni načrt, da EU skupaj doseže cilj dveh milijard EUR, opredeljeni bi bili načini za usklajevanje in odziv na različnih geografskih ravneh ter v splošnem obravnavane zmožnosti EU, da oblikuje, spremlja in določi najboljše prakse za zagotavljanje pomoči za trgovino.
The October GAERC also asked for the formulation of a joint EU Strategy on AfT by Spring 2007 which would "set a road map for the EU collectively to reach the € 2 billion target", "identify modalities for coordination and response at various geographical levels", and would generally address the EU's ability to deliver, monitor and set best practise in delivering Aft.
Tako je obravnava tega poročila v Odboru za mednarodno trgovino časovno ustrezna, saj bo predstavljeno stališče Evropskega parlamenta glede tega, kaj naj bo v skupni evropski strategiji o pomoči za trgovino zapisano o zagotavljanju in spremljanju pomoči za trgovino EU.
This report’s passage through the International Trade Committee is therefore timely, as it presents the European Parliament’s (EP) view on what the EU Joint Aid for Trade Strategy should say about the delivery and monitoring of the EU’s AfT.
Sodelovanje Parlamenta
Parliament Involvement
Po zgledu evropskega soglasja o razvoju, kjer je imel Evropski parlament osrednjo vlogo pri oblikovanju, se v poročilu zahteva dejavno sodelovanje pri oblikovanju skupne strategije EU o pomoči za trgovino.
Drawing on the example of the European Consensus on Development, in which the European Parliament played an integral role in its formulation, the report asks to be actively involved in the formulation of the EU’s Joint Aid for Trade strategy.
Poročilo tudi poziva Komisijo, naj Evropskemu parlamentu od leta 2008 predloži šestmesečno poročilo z oceno zagotavljanja pomoči za trgovino EU.
The report also calls on the Commission to submit biannual report to the EP, commencing from 2008, evaluating the delivery of the EU’s AfT.
Področje uporabe pomoči za trgovino
The Scope of Aid for Trade
Poročilo priznava, da so ugotovitve delovne skupine STO za pomoč za trgovino koristne pri širitvi opredelitve pomoči za trgovino, da vključuje trgovinsko infrastrukturo, prilagajanje trgovine in krepitev proizvodne zmogljivosti.
In the report it is recognised that the findings of the WTO AfT TF are highly constructive in expanding the definition of AfT to include "trade related infrastructure", "trade related adjustment" and "building productive capacity".
Vendar tudi priznava, da je treba zavezo Komisije in zaveze držav članic presojati v okviru tradicionalne opredelitve pomoči za trgovino v podatkovni bazi odbora OECD za razvojno pomoč, kjer je omejena na trgovinsko politiko in ureditev ter razvoj trgovine.
However, it is also acknowledged that the commitment from the Commission and Member States commitments should be judged within the confines of the traditional OECD/DAC database definition of AfT, which is limited to "trade policy and regulation" and "trade development".
Delovna skupina STO za pomoč za trgovino je ugotovila številne nejasnosti, ki trenutno onemogočajo dosego mednarodnega soglasja o opredelitvi pomoči za trgovino, zaradi česar sedaj ni mogoče določiti ciljev v njenih okvirih.
The findings of the WTO AfT TF present a number of ambiguities, which currently preclude an international consensus being formed on the AfT definition, and therefore prevent, for the moment, targets being set within its confines.
Glede na to, da so bile prvotne zaveze EU dane po stari opredelitvi odbora OECD za razvojno pomoč, bi s širitvijo te obveze na nove kategorije pomoči za trgovino Komisija in države članice lahko prerazporedile pomoč za uresničitev svojih ciljev.
Moreover, given that the original EU commitments were given with the old OECD/DAC definition, to allow the Commission and Member States to broaden this commitment to include the new AfT categories may allow them to re-label assistance in order to meet their targets.
Vendar poročilo vztraja, da Komisija v svoji skupni strategiji o pomoči za trgovino predloži konkretne ukrepe za vse vidike opredelitve pomoči za trgovino, kot jo je določila delovna skupina STO za pomoč za trgovino.
The report does insist however that the Commission presents in its Joint AfT Strategy concrete measures addressing the full breadth of the AfT definition as given by the WTO AfT Taskforce.
Izredno pomembno je, da so obravnavani vsi vidiki te opredelitve, če naj se gospodarstva držav v razvoju uspešno vključijo v svetovno gospodarstvo ter se ublažijo morebitni škodljivi vplivi prilagajanja trgovine.
Indeed, it is essential that all of the aspects contained within this definition are addressed if developing world economies are to successfully integrate into the global economy, and the possibly harmful effects of trade related adjustment are to be mitigated.
Prilagajanje trgovine
Trade Related Adjustment
Pomoč za prilagajanje trgovine – namenjena lažjemu procesu preoblikovanja in ne le kot nadomestilo – je potrebna, med drugim za zmanjšanje stroškov zaradi odpravljanja preferencialov, izgube dohodka iz carin in stroškov zaradi višjih cen hrane, ki bodo verjetno prizadeli države neto uvoznice hrane.
Trade related adjustment assistance - targeted to facilitate the process of restructuring, rather than just to provide compensation - is needed, amongst others, to mitigate the costs of preference erosion, loss of revenue from trade tariffs, and the costs resulting from increases in food prices likely to affect net food importing countries.
V notranji politiki Skupnosti se že priznava potreba po intervenciji politike za zmanjšanje učinkov gospodarskega prilagajanja, na primer prek sklada za prilagajanje na globalizacijo, v zunanji politiki pa na primer prek akcijskih načrtov za sladkor.
The need for policy intervention to mitigate the effects of economic adjustment is already acknowledged through internal Community policy, through for example, the Globalisation Adjustment Fund, and external policy, through for example, the Sugar Action Plans.
Tudi komisar EU za trgovino je 4. februarja 2005 predlagal ustanovitev posebnega sklada za prilagajanje trgovine, da bi "pomagali revnim pri učinkovitejši trgovini ter zmanjšali socialne stroške prilagajanja".
And indeed the EU Trade Commissioner himself proposed (on 4 February 2005) the establishment of a special Trade Adjustment Fund to "help the poor trade more effectively and ease the social costs of adjustment".
Na večstranski ravni sicer obstaja mehanizem prilagajanja, to je mehanizem za trgovinsko združevanje pri Mednarodnem denarnem skladu, ki pa ni dostopen brez programa MDS, je v obliki posojil in zato ni primeren za močno zadolžene države, trenutno pa v njem sodelujejo samo tri države.
While there is in existence an adjustment mechanism at the multi-lateral level in the form of the IMF's TIM mechanism, it is not accessible to those without an IMF programme, takes the form of loans and is therefore not appropriate for heavily indebted countries, and so far only three countries have accessed this facility.
Zato poročilo poziva k reviziji mehanizma za trgovinsko združevanje.
The report therefore calls for a review of the TIM facility.
Da bi zagotovili, da pomoč za trgovino EU ustreza pariškim načelom o učinkovitosti pomoči in je usmerjena na prejemnika, poročilo kot izhodišče priporoča oblikovanje procesa na nacionalni ravni, kjer so vključena tudi ustrezna ministrstva, skupaj z donatorskimi ministrstvi za trgovino in zlasti z zasebnim sektorjem.
In order to ensure that the EU’s AfT adheres to the Paris Principles on aid effectiveness and is recipient driven the report recommends, as a starting point, the creation of a process at the national level which includes the relevant ministries, including the Ministries of Trade donors and importantly the private sector.
Drug ključni element pri določanju potreb najmanj razvitih držav pri pomoči za trgovino je okrepljen celostni okvir, ki ga skupaj vodijo Mednarodni denarni sklad, Mednarodni trgovinski center, konferenca ZN o trgovini in razvoju (UNCTAD), program ZN za razvoj, Svetovna banka in Svetovna trgovinska organizacija.
Another key element in identifying LDC’s AfT needs will be the enhanced Integrated Framework (IF) – run collaboratively by the IMF, ITC, UNCTAD, UNDP, World Bank and WTO.
Celostni okvir ima dva cilja: vključitev trgovine v nacionalne razvojne načrte in v strategije za zmanjševanje revščine v najmanj razvitih državah ter pomoč pri usklajenem zagotavljanju tehnične pomoči za trgovino za potrebe, ki jih opredelijo najmanj razvite države.
The IF has the dual objectives of mainstreaming trade into LDCs’ national development plans and poverty reduction strategies, and to assist in the coordinated delivery of trade-related technical assistance in response to needs identified by LDCs.
Pomoč za trgovino EU mora podpreti druge prednostne naloge in vrednote EU, torej je treba s pomočjo za trgovino podpreti izvajanje zakonodaje, s katero bodo zagotovljeni osnovni delovni standardi po konvencijah Mednarodne organizacije dela ter okoljski standardi.
The EU's AfT must support the EU's other priorities and values, hence AfT should be used to support the implementation of legislation guaranteeing both core labour standards as enshrined in ILO conventions, and environmental standards.
Potreba po dodatni pomoči
The Need for Additional Assistance
Poročilo poziva k popolni združitvi razvojne in trgovinske politike.
The report calls for the full integration of development and trade policies.
To pomeni, da je zelo pomembno, da so sredstva pomoči za trgovino dodatek že obstoječi razvojni pomoči in zato druge razvojne prednostne naloge niso prikrajšane.
This means that it is essential that AfT finance is additional to pre-existing development assistance and does not detract from other development priorities.
Če naj bo pomoč za trgovino usmerjena na prejemnika, potem je nujno, da razpoložljiva vsota pomoči za trgovino ustreza vse večjim potrebam.
Similarly, if AfT is to be truly recipient-led then it is essential that the amount of AfT available is responsive to growing levels of demand.
Potrebe se lahko bistveno povečajo; na primer pri dialogu o politiki pomoči za trgovino pri OECD novembra 2006 je namestnik ministrskega predsednika Mauritiusa predstavil načrte, za katere bi bili v 10 letih potrebni 2 milijardi EUR sredstev pomoči za trgovino.
Indeed demand may grow substantially; for example at an OECD AfT policy dialogue in November 2006, Mauritius's deputy Prime Minister outlined plans which would require €2bn in AfT funding over 10 years.
Jamstvo EU, da bo povečala obseg razvojne pomoči za 20 milijard EUR na 0,56 % BDP do leta 2010, pomeni, da mora biti na voljo dovolj sredstev za zadostitev vse večjim potrebam.
That the EU has pledged to raise its levels of development assistance by €20 billion to 0.56% of GDP by 2010, means that there should be ample finance available to respond to rising demands.
Potreba po dodatnih sredstvih je še toliko bolj očitna, če upoštevamo, da cilj Komisije za povečanje pomoči za trgovino na 1 milijardo EUR do leta 2010 vzeto pod drobnogled pomeni ne posebej ambiciozno povečanje 150 milijonov EUR v štirih letih.
The need for extra finance is even more apparent when we consider that the Commission target of raising AfT to €1 billion by 2010, upon closer inspection, meant a not particularly ambitious €150 million increase over 4 years.
Na ministrski konferenci v Hongkongu se je vsota sredstev, obljubljenih za celostni okvir, povečala za 25 milijonov dolarjev na 60 milijonov dolarjev, kar pa je še vedno manj od zahtevanih 300 milijonov dolarjev.
While at the Kong Ministerial in 2005, the level of financing pledged for the IF increased by $25 million to $60 million, this still leaves it short of the required $300 million.
Komisija in države članice naj zato natančneje določijo svoje zaveze za celostni okvir.
The Commission and member states should therefore clarify their commitments to the IF.
Komisija naj v ta namen uporabi in razširi novo proračunsko vrstico za pomoč za trgovino.
For this purpose the Commission should utilise and expand the newly created Aid for Trade budget line.
Pomoč za trgovino, sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu in razvojni načrt iz Dohe
Aid for Trade, EPAs and the Doha Development Agenda
Prav je, da pomoč za trgovino v razvojnem načrtu iz Dohe ostane ločena in ni odvisna od "samostojnih pogajanj" v krogu pogajanj STO v Dohi.
It is proper that the AfT element of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA should be kept separate from, and should not be conditional upon, the "single undertaking" of the Doha Round of WTO negotiations.
Ravno tako je treba pri sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu, o katerih ta čas tečejo pogajanja z državami AKP, pomoč za trgovino zagotoviti ne glede na izid pogajanj.
Similarly, within the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) currently being negotiated with ACP countries, AfT assistance should be provided regardless of the outcome of EPA negotiations.
Komisija in države članice naj pred sklenitvijo sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu jasno predstavijo sredstva za pomoč za trgovino, ki so na voljo državam AKP, tako da lahko ustrezno predvidijo obseg pomoči, ki jo bodo prejele za pomoč trgovini v okviru sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu ter za zmanjšanje stroškov zaradi prilagajanja sporazumom.
The Commission and Member States should clearly present the available AfT finance available to ACP states, prior to the conclusion of EPAs so that they can properly anticipate the level of assistance they will receive both in order to facilitate trade within EPAs, and to mitigate EPA related adjustment costs.
To bo ponovno okrepilo razvojno razsežnost sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu, njena dosedanja odsotnost je bila namreč nenavadna.
This would help to bring the development dimension of EPAs, which has been hitherto conspicuous by its absence, back to the fore.
Pomoč za trgovino ima tudi ključno vlogo pri pospeševanju oblikovanja regionalnih trgovinskih blokov, predvidenih v sporazumih v gospodarskem partnerstvu, ter pri pospeševanju medregionalne in intraregionalne trgovine med jugom in jugom.
There is also a key role for AfT in facilitating the creation of the regional trading blocs envisaged within EPAs, and in facilitating inter-regional, and intra-regional South-South trade.
o pomoči EU za trgovino
on the EU's Aid for Trade
2. opozarja, da mora pomoč za trgovino izboljšati dostop do trga za male in zapostavljene proizvajalce v državah v razvoju; glede na to poziva, da se 10 % sredstev pomoči za trgovino nameni za pomoč za pravično trgovino v skladu z odstavkom 19 resolucije z dne 6. julija 2006 o pravični trgovini in razvoju;
Recalls that Aid for Trade must improve market access for small and disadvantaged producers in developing countries; in this respect calls for 10% of the Aid for Trade budget to be earmarked for Aid for Fair Trade, in accordance with paragraph 19 of its resolution of 6 July 2006 on Fair Trade and Development
3. meni, da bi moral paket pomoči za trgovino vključevati široko paleto ukrepov za krepitev zmogljivosti in tehnično pomoč, da se izboljšajo zmožnosti držav AKP za prepoznavanje potreb in strategij ter za razvoj njihovih sposobnosti in učinkovitosti pri trgovinskih pogajanjih, njihove zmogljivosti oblikovanja regionalne trgovinske politike, zlasti medregionalne trgovine jug-jug, in njihove zmogljivosti za vzpostavitev lokalnih trgov;
Considers that the Aid for Trade package should include a wide range of capacity-building measures and technical assistance to improve the ability of African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States to identify needs and strategies and develop their competence and efficiency in trade negotiations, their capacity to formulate regional trade policy, in particular as regards South-South inter-regional trade, and their capacity to establish local markets;
7. poudarja, da glede na to, da mora biti paket pomoči za trgovino dodatek k obstoječi razvojni pomoči, nove obljube pomoči za trgovino ne smejo povzročiti premeščanja sredstev, že namenjenih drugim razvojnim pobudam, kot so zdravstveni in izobraževalni projekti, ki so izjemno pomembni za gradnjo močnega gospodarstva;
Stresses that, on the view that the Aid for Trade package should be additional to existing development aid, new Aid for Trade pledges should not lead to the shifting of resources already earmarked for other development initiatives, such as health and education projects, which are extremely important for building a strong economy;
9. poziva EU, naj izpolni vse obveznosti do najmanj razvitih držav, sprejete na pogajanjih v Dohi, s predčasnim razvojnim paketom in odpravo svojih kmetijskih izvoznih subvencij do leta 2013; poudarja, da mora EU pozvati ostale članice STO, naj ravno tako izpolnijo svoje obveznosti do najmanj razvitih držav;
Urges the EU to fulfil all the commitments that it made in the Doha Round to the least developed countries by frontloading the development package as well as eliminating its agricultural export subsidies by 2013; stresses that the EU must urge the other members of the WTO to do the same in relation to their commitments to the least developed countries;
14. poudarja, da se je nujno treba soočiti z izzivom, kako uspešno zagotoviti učinkovito pomoč za trgovino državam AKP, ki so že vključene v izvajanje sporazuma z EU o prostotrgovinskem področju (in sicer Bocvana, Lesoto, Namibija in Svazi, ki so na pol poti pri odpravljanju tarif v trgovini z EU).
Stresses the urgency of getting to grips with the challenge of efficiently delivering effective Aid for Trade to ACP countries already engaged in the implementation of a free trade area agreement with the EU (namely Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland, which are half way through eliminating tarrifss on trade with the EU).
Pomoč EU za trgovino
The EU’s Aid for Trade
o zaustavitvi izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010
on halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010
PE 378.721v01-00
PE 378.721v02-00
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................20
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...20
MNENJE Odbora za ribištvo ........................................................................................24
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................24
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Zaustavitev izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 in pozneje: Ohranjanje storitev ekosistemov za blaginjo ljudi ( KOM(2006)0216 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission on 'Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010-and beyond: sustaining ecosystem services for human well- being' ( COM(2006)0216 ) ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. oktobra 1998 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o strategiji Evropske skupnosti o biotski raznovrstnosti
– having regard to its resolution of 20 October 1998 on the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on a European Community biodiversity strategy
UL C 341, 9.11.1998, str.
OJC 341, 9.11.1998, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. marca 2002 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o akcijskih načrtih za biotsko raznovrstnost na področjih ohranjanja naravnih virov, kmetijstva, ribištva ter razvoja in gospodarskega sodelovanja
– having regard to its resolution of 14 March 2002 on the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the biodiversity action plans in the areas of conservation of natural resources, agriculture, fisheries, and development and economic cooperation
UL C 47, 27.2.2003, str.
OJC 047 27.2.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. junija 1993 o predlogu sklepa Sveta o zaključkih konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti
– having regard to its opinion of 25 June 1993 on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Convention on Biological Diversity
UL C 194, 19.7.1993, str.
OJ C 194, 19.7.1993, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prostoživečih ptic (direktiva o pticah)
– having regard to Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (Birds Directive)
1. ter svoje resolucije z dne 17. januarja 2001 o izvajanju Direktive 92/43/EGS o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst (direktiva o habitatih)
1. and to its resolution of 17 January 2001 on implementation of Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild flora and fauna (Habitats Directive)
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 31. maja 2001 o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa Skupnosti (2001–2010)
– having regard to its position of 31 May 2001 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up the Sixth Community Action Programme for the Environment (2001-2010)
– ob upoštevanju zaključkov 8. zasedanja konference pogodbenic (COP 8) Konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti ter tretjega srečanja pogodbenic (MOP 3) Kartagenskega protokola o biološki varnosti,
– having regard to the outcome of the eighth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 8) to the Convention on Biological Diversity and of the third meeting of the Parties (MOP 3) to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in mnenj Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0089/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0089/2007 ),
A. ker se bo sedanji hitri upad biotske raznovrstnosti, ki je zelo zaskrbljujoč, brez obsežnih ukrepov verjetno še pospešil in nadaljevalo,
A. whereas the worrying current rate of biodiversity loss is likely to gather pace and continue in the absence of large-scale measures,
B. ker je na voljo malo ustreznih kazalnikov, s katerimi bi učinkovito izmerili, v kolikšni meri se pri izvedbi različnih politik upoštevajo zahteve biotske raznovrstnosti, eden najpomembnejših pa je indeks ptic kmetijske krajine,
B. whereas there are few adequate indicators available for effectively measuring the extent to which the imperatives of biological diversity are being complied with in the implementation of the various policies, one of the most notable being the Common Farmland Bird Index,
C. ker ima biotska raznovrstnost bistveno vlogo pri ohranjanju življenja in preživljanju, gospodarskem in socialnem razvoju, blaginji ljudi ter pri uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja do leta 2015,
C. whereas biodiversity plays an essential role in sustaining life and livelihoods, economic and social development and human well-being, as well as in achieving the 2015 Millennium Development Goals,
D. ker po navedbah ZN v presoji ekosistemov tisočletja iz leta 2005 dve tretjini vseh ekosistemov od začetka 60-ih let nazadujeta;
D. whereas, according to the UN 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, there has been a decline in two thirds of all ecosystems since the beginning of the 1960s,
E. ker so poglavitni dejavniki za izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti sprememba podnebja, degradacija okolja, intenzivno kmetovanje ter neustrezno upravljanje gozdnih in vodnih virov;
E. whereas the main factors behind the loss of biological diversity are climate change, environmental degradation, the use of intensive farming methods and inappropriate forest and water resource management,