natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Uporabi se načelo previdnosti, mejne vrednosti ostankov pa se določijo na najnižje razumne vrednosti.
The Precautionary Principle shall be applied and temporary MRLs be set at the lowest reasonable value.
Člen 24, odstavek 1, uvodni stavek
ARTICLE 24, PARAGRAPH 1, INTRODUCTORY PHRASE
Organ mora Komisiji na zahtevo Komisije zagotoviti utemeljeno mnenje o morebitnih tveganjih za zdravje potrošnikov, ki izhajajo iz:
At the request of the Commission, the Authority shall provide a reasoned opinion to the Commission on potential risks to consumer health arising from:
Organ mora Komisiji zagotoviti utemeljeno mnenje o morebitnih tveganjih za zdravje potrošnikov, ki izhajajo iz:
The Authority shall provide a reasoned opinion to the Commission on potential risks to consumer health arising from:
Zagotovljena mora biti neodvisnost organa pri pripravi njegovega mnenja.
The autonomy of the Authority in drawing up its opinion needs to be guaranteed.
To pa seveda ne posega v pravico Komisije, da zahteva, da organ pripravi svoje mnenje.
This does, however, not prejudice the Commission’s right to ask it to draw up opinions.
Člen 25
ARTICLE 25
Ob upoštevanju mnenja organa, če se tako mnenje zahteva, se določijo začasne mejne vrednosti za aktivne snovi iz člena 23 in navedejo v prilogi III na podlagi člena 22(1) ali se, kjer je to primerno, aktivne snovi vključijo v prilogo IV na podlagi člena 5(1).
Taking into account the opinion of the Authority, if such opinion is requested, temporary MRLs for active substances referred to in Article 23 may be set and listed in Annex III pursuant to Article 22(1) or, as appropriate, the active substance may be included in Annex IV pursuant to Article 5(1).
Začasne MVO se določijo na najnižji stopnji, ki se lahko doseže v vseh državah članicah na osnovi dobre kmetijske prakse.
Temporary MRLs shall be set at the lowest level that can be achieved in all Member States on the basis of good agricultural practice.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 49, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 49 carried at first reading.
Pomembno je navesti, da začasne MVO temeljijo na dobri kmetijski praksi.
It is important to state that temporary MRLs shall be based on good agricultural practice.
Člen 26, odstavek 2
ARTICLE 26, PARAGRAPH 2
Nadzor ostankov pesticidov obsega predvsem jemanje vzorcev, analizo vzorcev ter določanje prisotnih pesticidov in ugotavljanje vrednosti njihovih ostankov.
Such controls on pesticide residues shall, in particular, consist of sampling and subsequent analysis of the samples and identification of the pesticides present and their respective residue levels.
Spremljanje se izvaja zlasti na mestu, kjer potrošnik prevzame proizvod.
This monitoring shall be done in particular at the point of supply to the consumer.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 54, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 54 carried at first reading.
Pomembno je, da se vrednost ostankov spremlja na mestu, kjer potrošnik prevzame proizvod.
It is important that residues are monitored at the point of supply to the consumer.
Člen 30, odstavek 3
ARTICLE 30, PARAGRAPH 3
Države članice sodelujejo pri nadzornem programu Skupnosti, kot je določeno v členu 29.
Member States shall participate in the Community Control Programme as provided for in Article 29.
Vsako četrtletje objavijo vse rezultate nacionalnega spremljanja ostankov na svetovnem spletu.
They shall, on a quarterly basis, publish all results of national residue monitoring on the internet.
V primeru, da je mejna vrednost ostankov presežena, lahko države članice razkrijejo ime zadevnega trgovca na drobno, trgovca na debelo ali proizvajalca.
Where MRLs are exceeded, Member States may name the retailers, traders or producers concerned.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 59 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of amendment 59 carried at first reading.
Preglednost je z vidika potrošnika pomembna.
Transparency for consumers is important.
Treba jim je omogočiti, da se premišljeno odločijo za proizvod, tudi na podlagi prisotnosti ostankov in upoštevanja uredbe.
They should be given the possibility to make a reasoned choice for a product, also based on the presence of residues and the compliance with the Regulation.
Četrtletno objavljanje ostankov se v praksi že izvaja v Združenem kraljestvu
This quarterly publication of residues is already being practised in the UK.
Člen 35
ARTICLE 35
Člena 53 in 54 Uredbe (ES) 178/2002 se uporabljata, kadar ostanki pesticidov ali mejne vrednosti ostankov, ki jih ureja ta uredba,zaradi novih podatkov ali ponovne presoje obstoječih podatkov ogrožajo zdravje človeka ali živali in je treba nemudoma ukrepati.
Articles 53 and 54 of Regulation (EC) 178/2002 shall apply where, as a result of new information or of a reassessment of existing information, pesticide residues or MRLs covered by this Regulation may endanger human or animal health requiring immediate action.
Člena 53 in 54 Uredbe (ES) 178/2002 se uporabljata, kadar ostanki pesticidov ali mejne vrednosti ostankov, ki jih ureja ta uredba, zaradi novih podatkov ali ponovne presoje obstoječih podatkov ogrožajo zdravje človeka ali živali in je treba nemudoma ukrepati.
Articles 53 and 54 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 shall apply where, as a result of new information or of a reassessment of existing information, pesticide residues or MRLs covered by this Regulation may endanger human or animal health requiring immediate action.
Rok, v katerem Komisija mora sprejeti odločitev, se v primeru svežih proizvodov skrajša na sedem dni.
The time limit within which the Commission must take its decision shall be reduced to seven days in the case of fresh produce.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 61, sprejet v prvi obravnavi.
Reinstatement of amendment 61 carried at first reading.
Za sveže in posušene proizvode je smiselno določiti različne roke, saj sveži proizvodi po desetih dneh niso več primerni za uživanje.
It is not appropriate for one time period to be set for fresh and dried produce – fresh produce will not stay fit for consumption over ten days.
Z zadovoljstvom ugotavljamo, da je Svet natančno preučil in obdelal dokument, ki je sedaj veliko uporabnejši kot izvirni predlog Komisije.
It is pleasing to see the work the Council has done on the document, and it appears a far more workable document than the original Commission proposal.
Predlog je bolj smiselno zasnovan, lažje razumljiv in uporaben kot zakonodajni dokument.
The proposal is better designed, and easier to follow, and it appears a workable legislative document.
Zlasti dobrodošla je poenostavitev postopka o zahtevi glede MVO, ki natančneje določa vlogo držav članic, Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (EFSA) in Komisije.
Particularly welcome is the simplification of the applications procedure, which defines the roles of Member States, EFSA and the Commission far more clearly.
Svet veliko bolj prepričljivo obravnava tudi problem začasnih mejnih vrednosti.
The Council also deals with the problem of temporary MRLs far more cogently.
Razveseljivo je, da je v svojem skupnem stališču Svet prevzel časovni razpored za prilogo k uredbi, kakor ga je sprejel Parlament v prvi obravnavi, in v zvezi s proizvodi upošteval “uporabo bistvenega pomena”.
It is pleasing to note that the timetable set up for the annexes in the regulation, as adopted by Parliament in its first reading, has been taking on board in the Council's common position, as well as the consideration shown to "essential use" products.
Kljub temu stališče Sveta zanemarja vidik javnega zdravja.
However, the Council's position neglects public health perceptions.
Medtem ko zakonodaja predvideva mejne vrednosti ostankov, pri katerih gre prej za trgovinske standarde, določene na osnovi dobre kmetijske prakse, kot standarde javnega zdravja, se na splošno pojavljajo nejasnosti v zvezi z MVO in pesticidi in te je treba v zakonodaji odpraviti.
Whilst the legislation deals with MRLs which are trading standards, based on good agricultural practice, rather than public health standards, there is confusion over MRLs and pesticides in general, and this should be addressed in the legislation.
Za dosego tega cilja je treba rešiti predvsem primere, ko so MVO presežene, in sicer z razkritjem imen zadevnih trgovcev ali proizvajalcev.
To this end, we should especially cover situations where MRLs are exceeded, by naming and shaming.
Poleg tega je treba zagotoviti skupne standarde za poročanje o MVO in spremljanje na mestu, kjer potrošnik prevzame proizvod.
It should also be ensured that there are common standards for reporting of MRLs and monitoring at the point of supply.
Poskrbeti je treba, da bodo podskupine, ki zaužijejo več proizvodov določene vrste, v celoti zaščitene.
We should ensure that subgroups which may consume more of a certain type of product are fully protected.
Prav tako je pomembno zagotoviti visoke standarde za uvoz.
Also important are ensuring high standards for imports.
Tolerančne mejne vrednosti ostankov pri uvozu so bistveni del trgovine in so potrebne za proizvode, ki se v EU zaradi stroškovne učinkovitosti ne uporabljajo.
Import tolerances are an essential part of trade, and are needed for products that are not utilised in the EU for reasons of cost efficacy.
Predlagajo se tudi spremembe, ki prispevajo k nemotenemu delovanju zakonodaje.
In addition to these concerns, amendments are suggested to enhance the smooth running of the legislation.
Ti predlogi sprememb obsegajo rok največ dveh let, če se zahtevajo dodatni podatki, skrajšanje roka v primeru odločanja o nujnih ukrepih glede svežih proizvodov in razumno stališče o zeliščnih poparkih, ki bi jih bilo zaradi zapletene sestave treba obravnavati ločeno.
These cover a maximum period of two years, when extra information is requested, a shortening of the period required for decisions on emergency procedures on fresh produce, and a sensible view on herbal infusions, which should have separate assessment due to their many component parts.
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o mejnih vrednostih ostankov pesticidov v ali na živilih ali krmi rastlinskega ali živalskega izvora in glede spremembe Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS
Council common position for adopting a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC
člen 251(2) in člen 152(4) (b) ES
Articles 251(2) and 152(4) (b) EC
člen 62
Rule 62
Datum 1. obravnave EP – P[5]
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P5
Predlog Komisije
Commission proposal
Spremenjeni predlog Komisije
Amended Commission proposal
Datum razglasitve prejetja skupnega stališča na zasedanju
Date receipt of common position announced in plenary
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano 15.9.2004
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy 15.9.2004
Namestniki, navzoči na končnem glasovanju
Substitutes present for the final vote
o predlogu sklepa Sveta, ki spreminja Sklep 1999/847/ES o razširitvi akcijskega programa Skupnosti na področju civilne zaščite
on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 1999/847/EC as regards the extension of the Community action programme in the field of civil protection
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2004)0512 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0512 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 308 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0111/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0111/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano (A6‑0000/2004),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0050/2004 ),
Sklep Sveta, ki spreminja Sklep 1999/847/ES o razširitvi akcijskega programa Skupnosti na področju civilne zaščite
Council Decision amending Decision 1999/847/EC as regards the extension of the Community action programme in the field of civil protection
Trenutni akcijski program Skupnosti na področju civilne zaščite poteče 31. decembra 2004.
The current Community Action Programme in the field of civil protection expires on 31 December 2004.
Komisija predlaga podaljšanje programa za dve leti, in sicer od januarja 2005 do decembra 2006, saj bi se tako izognili praznini med potekom obstoječega programa in datumom, ko v veljavo vstopi novi pravni instrument.
In order to avoid a gap between the expiry of the existing programme and the date of application of a new legal instrument, the Commission proposes to prolong the programme for two years, starting from January 2005 and ending in December 2006.
Komisija je v svojem predlogu zahtevala zvišanje proračuna za akcijski program na področju civilne zaščite iz 1,5 milijonov evrov (v letu 2004) na 2,4 milijona evrov letno (za 2005 in 2006).
In its proposal the Commission requested an increase of the budget for the Action Programme in the field of Civil Protection from 1.5mio € (in 2004) to 2.4mio € annually (for 2005 and 2006).
To predstavlja letno zvišanje za 0,9 milijonov evrov, delno zaradi širitve EU in delno zaradi proračunske okrepitve akcijskega programa na področju onesnaževanja morja, o kateri je odločil Evropski parlament.
This represents an annual increase of 0.9mio €, partly due to the enlargement of the EU and partly to the budgetary reinforcement of the Marine Pollution Action Programme decided by the European Parliament.
Ob ustreznem upoštevanju prihodnjih potreb po posredovanju civilne zaščite poročevalec meni, da je predlog Komisije realen in se zato strinja s podaljšanjem programa in s predlaganim proračunom.
Taking due account of the future needs for civil protection interventions, the rapporteur is of the opinion that the Commission proposal is realistic and therefore agrees to the prolongation of the Programme and the budget proposed.
Sporočilo Komisije: Krepitev zmogljivosti civilne zaščite Evropske unije
Commission Communication: Reinforcing the Civil Protection Capacity of the European Union
Komisija je prav tako sprejela Sporočilo o krepitvi zmogljivost civilne zaščite Evropske unije (KOM (2004) 200).
The Commission has also adopted a Communication on reinforcing the Civil Protection Capacity of the European Union (COM (2004) 200).
Ozadje sporočila so naše izkušnje z vrsto katastrof v preteklih letih, kot so: poplave, vročinski vali, gozdni požari, potresi, incidenti onesnaževanja s strupenimi odpadki, resne industrijske nesreče in tudi teroristični napadi.
The background for this Communication is that we have experienced a series of disasters over the last years such as floods, heat-waves, forest fires, earthquakes, pollution incidents by toxic waste release, serious industrial accidents and also terrorist attacks.
Poleg tega so še katastrofe, ki jih povzroča človek, kot je razlitje nafte ladje Prestige.
In addition there have been manmade disasters such as the Prestige oil spill.
Vse te katastrofe so zahtevale neštete žrtve, povzročale bolj in bolj pomembno gospodarsko škodo in pustošile življenja milijonov ljudi po vsem svetu.
All these disasters claimed innumerable victims, caused increasingly significant economic damage and devastated the lives of millions of people around the world.
Ohromile so gospodarstvo prizadetih držav, se najbolj dotaknile najrevnejših in najbolj ranljivih slojev prebivalstva v razvitem svetu, najhuje prizadele najrevnejše države in se na splošno dojemajo kot najpoglavitnejša ovira trajnostnega razvoja in prizadevanj za zmanjševanje revščine.
These catastrophes disrupt the economies of the countries affected, hitting the poorest and most vulnerable layers of the population in the developed world, affecting the poorest countries hardest, and are generally regarded as a major obstacle to sustainable development and efforts to reduce poverty.
Ta dejstva pozivajo vlade, da se dejavno odzovejo in okrepijo preventivne ukrepe in zmogljivosti za odzivanja.
All these events call for action by governments to strengthen preventive measures and reinforce response capacities.
Parlament je s sprejetjem resolucije leta 2003 (2003/2066), ko ga je predramil vročinski val tistega poletja in v kateri je pozval po vzpostavitvi evropskih sil za civilno zaščito, že izrazil svojo solidarnost.
The Parliament has already expressed its solidarity by adopting a resolution in 2003 (2003/2066), in the wake of the heat-wave that summer, in which it called for the creation of a European Civil Protection Force.
Sporočilo predstavlja analizo in oceno zmogljivosti mehanizma Skupnosti, ki se sooča z katastrofami in ki je bil vzpostavljen leta 2001 (s Sklepom Sveta 2001/792).
The Communication presents an analysis and assessment of the capacity of the Community mechanism dealing with catastrophes, which was set up in 2001 (by Council Decision 2001/792).
Mehanizem civilne zaščite Skupnosti s skupinami za civilno zaščito iz sodelujočih držav nudi takojšnjo pomoč.
The Community Civil Protection Mechanism provides immediate assistance through the civil protection teams of the participating states.
Osrčje mehanizma Skupnosti je center za nadzor in informiranje.
The Monitoring and Information Centre is at the heart of the Community Mechanism.
Deluje 24 ur na dan, podpira pa ga podatkovna zbirka, programi izobraževanja in delavnic in skupni sistem komuniciranja in informiranja v sili.
It operates on a 24 hours basis a day supported by a database, training and workshop programmes, and a Common Emergency Communication and Information System.
Ko obseg nesreče preseže zmogljivost nacionalnega odzivanja, se lahko v kratkem času vzpostavi nujno potrebna dodatna pomoč, v kolikor so ostale države pripravljene deliti svoje strokovno znanje in opremo.
When the scale of a disaster overwhelms national response capacities, vital additional assistance can be provided at a short notice if other countries are willing to share their expertise and equipment.
Poročevalec meni, da je upravljanje integracije, da bo učinkovito v polni meri, potrebno nasloviti v vsaki fazi.
The rapporteur believes that integration management must be applied at every stage if it is to be fully effective.
Po njegovem mnenju so poglavitne naslednje faze:
He thinks that the main stages are as follows:
– preventiva: ta faza vključuje ukrepe, ki se sprejmejo pred samim klicem v sili in preprečujejo, da se le-ta sploh pojavi, ali zmanjšujejo njen učinek (npr. označevanje tveganih območij, izogibanje škodi, tako da se ne dovoljuje poselitev občutljivih predelov),
– prevention : this phase encompasses measures which are adopted in advance of an emergency and which seek to prevent it occurring or to reduce its severity (e.g. mapping of risk areas, avoiding damage by not allowing settlement in sensitive sites),
– varovanje: ukrepanje v posameznih območjih,
– protection : taking measures in specific sites,
– nujni ukrepi: temeljni cilji nujnih ukrepov bodo zaščititi življenje, lastnino in okolje, do najnižje možne mere znižati škodljive učinke nesreč in preprečiti stopnjevanje le-teh,
– emergency measures : The basic objectives of the emergency measures will be to preserve life, property and the environment, to reduce to a minimum the harmful effects of the event and to prevent its escalation,
– reševalni ukrepi: to vključuje vso potrebno dejavnost, ki omogoča hitro vrnitev v normalno stanje.
– recovery measures : this encompasses those activities necessary to provide a rapid return to normality.
Sistem je teoretično dober.
On paper the system looks good.
Praktično in v realnosti pa se mehanizem sooča z resnimi pomanjkljivostmi.
However, on the ground and in real time the mechanism has serious shortcomings.
Izboljšati je potrebno zlasti sedem področij:
In particular, seven areas need improved action:
Boljša izmenjava podatkov o razpoložljivih virih, strokovnem znanju, izkušnjah ter uspešnih strategijah in praksah na nacionalnih ravneh: Podatkovna baza Komisije identificira potencialno razpoložljivo pomoč.
Better sharing of information on available resources, expertise and successful strategies and practices at national level: The Commission database identifies the potentially available assistance.
Ta podatkovna baza je trenutno precej osnovna in vsebuje predvsem informacije o skupinah za posredovanje.
At present this database is fairly basic and contains mainly information on intervention teams.
Izkušnje kažejo, da se podatkovna baza mora nadgraditi, da bo vsebovala potrebne informacije o zmogljivosti za odzivanje, s tem povezanih stroških, o vrsti razpoložljive opreme in kje se le-ta nahaja.
Experience shows that the database needs to be upgraded so it contains the necessary information on the response capacities, associated costs, what kind of equipment is available and where it is located.
Več usposabljanja za skupine za posredovanje: Izkušnje so prav tako pokazale, da se mora povečati tudi redno usposabljanje, skupne vaje za boljše sodelovanje in medobratovalnost in ostale oblike sodelovanja.
More training for intervention teams: Experience has also shown that regular training, common exercises for better cooperation and interoperability, and other forms of co-operation also need to be enhanced.
Vse to bo koristilo pri soočanju s praktičnimi težavami, kot so komunikacija in združljivost tehnične opreme, ki sta bistveni za zagotavljanje hitrega odzivanja.
They will be useful in highlighting practical difficulties such as communication and compatibility of technical equipment, which is essential to ensure a rapid response.
Poseben poudarek je potrebno posvetiti naboru in usposabljanju prostovoljcev iz vseh 25 držav Evropske unije.
A special emphasis should put in recruiting and training properly volunteers throughout 25 European states.
Boljša komunikacija, koordinacija informacijskega sistema za pravočasno in hitro obveščanje javnosti in povezave z ostalimi mrežami: Izboljšati se morajo tudi komunikacija, koordinacija in preverjanje načinov, da se izogne podvajanju.
Better communication, co-ordination, in time information systems for the prompt information of public and link with other networks: Communication, co-ordination and examining ways of avoiding duplication also need to be improved.
Zanimivo je opomniti, da se glede na obstoječi sklep, v kolikor pride do večje katastrofe, od držav članic ne zahteva, da obveščajo center Skupnosti za nadzor in informiranje, čeprav ima lahko katastrofa čezmejne posledice.
It is interesting to note that under the current decision, Member States are not required to inform the Community Monitoring and Information Centre when a major disaster occurs, even if it may have trans-boundary effects.
Komisija želi predlagati spremembo Sklepa Sveta 2001/792 in tako zagotoviti posredovanje takih informacij.
The Commission would like to propose to amend the Council Decision 2001/792, to ensure that this information is provided.
Poročevalec v tem podpira Komisijo.
The rapporteur supports the Commission in this.
Izboljšati se mora tudi ocenjevanje in izboljševanje postopkov za koordinacijo skupin iz različnih sodelujočih držav ter vzpostavljanje načinov komunikacije z vsemi ustreznimi akterji na licu mesta, kjer se nudi pomoč državam izven EU.
Where aid is provided to non-EU countries, examining and improving procedures for co-ordinating teams from the various participating countries and establishing channels of communication with all relevant players on the ground should also be improved.
Financiranje: Obstajajo finančne težave.
Financing: There are some financial difficulties.
Razpoložljiva likvidna sredstva in postopki Skupnosti (na primer nujno posredovanje ali naknadna kompenzacija skozi solidarnostni sklad) so bodisi kompleksni bodisi nezadovoljivi in pogosto prepočasi izvajani.
Available liquid assets and Community procedures (emergency intervention or a posteriori compensation through the Solidarity Fund, for example) are either complex or insufficient and often implemented too slowly.