natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
b. povečati produktivnost kmetijstva s spodbujanjem in odgovornim izkoriščanjem tehnološkega napredka, s smotrno uporabo postopkov kmetijske proizvodnje in učinkovito uporabo proizvodnih dejavnikov,
(b) to increase agricultural productivity by means of the promotion and responsible exploitation of technological progress, the rationalisation of farm production methods and effective use of production factors,
c. ponuditi kmečkemu prebivalstvu dolgoročne obete, zlasti s politikami za razvoj podeželja, z enakovrednimi pogoji za njihove izdelke na trgih EU ter ukrepi za ohranitev in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest na podeželju,
(c) offer the rural population long-term prospects, in particular by means of rural development policy measures , a level playing field for their products on the EU markets and measures to safeguard and create jobs in rural areas,
d. ustaliti trge, zagotoviti oskrbo prebivalstva z visoko kakovostnimi in neoporečnimi živili, katerih proizvodnja upošteva razumna merila o dobrobiti živali, okolju in delu,
(d) stabilise markets, guarantee that the public is supplied with high-quality and safe foodstuffs, which are produced under reasonable standards as regards animal welfare, the environment and labour,
e. razviti inovativne tehnike in zamisli za izboljšanje kakovosti proizvodnje hrane, za zniževanje stroškov vložka in proizvodnje ter za uporabo kmetijskih izdelkov kot surovin npr. na področju obnovljivih virov energije.“
(e) develop innovative techniques and concepts with the aim of improving the quality of food production, reducing input and production costs and using agricultural products as raw materials for example as renewable energy sources,
7. poziva k sprejetju ukrepov v okviru komunikacijske strategije Evropske unije, ki bi zagotovili obveščanje evropske javnosti o vprašanjih skupne kmetijske politike, zlasti v zvezi z njeno nedavno posodobitvijo ter uskladitvijo z novimi cilji Skupnosti;
Calls for measures to be taken as part of the European Union's communication strategy to keep the European public informed about the common agricultural policy, particularly regarding recent changes to update it and bring it into line with the new Community objectives;
Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
D a te announced in plenary
Datum sprejetja pobude
Date suggestions adopted
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education
o obdobju za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za vrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji
on the period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
Odbor za kulturo in izobraževanje poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Culture and Education calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. poziva k razpravi o prihodnosti Evropske unije z vidika mednarodne geostrategije, kolikor bi ta razprava omogočila natančnejšo opredelitev Evrope, ki si je državljani želijo v prihodnosti;
Calls for a debate on the future of the European Union from the international geostrategic point of view, in so far as such a debate can provide a better approach for deciding what kind of Europe its citizens want for the future;
4. meni, da morajo države članice, regije in skupnosti preko svoje bližine z državljani prispevati k razpravi o prihodnosti Unije in k temu, da bo Evropska unija lahko učinkoviteje in na konkretnejši način reševala probleme državljanov;
Considers that the Member States, regions and local authorities must contribute to the debate on the Union’s future, because of their greater closeness to the public, and do their part to ensure that the European Union is more efficient and effective in solving its citizens’ problems;
6. želi kljub temu poudariti, da mora iti komunikacijska strategija, če naj bi bila učinkovita, v korak z izvajanjem politike, ki je socialno, okoljsko in kulturno uravnotežena na ravni Unije, in predlaga, da Komisija, Svet in vsaka država članica dokažejo, da se s svojimi dejanji, kot je na primer ohranjanje evropskega modela, držijo smeri, ki jo želijo državljani;
Wishes nonetheless to point out that, to be effective, a communication strategy must be backed up by the implementation of socially, environmentally and culturally balanced policies at Union level, and suggests that the Commission, Council and each Member State should show that in every action they take they are moving in the direction desired by the people, namely preservation of the European model;
9. zahteva, da Komisija izdela razpored, ki bo omogočil sprejetje evropskega projekta v vseh državah Unije na isti dan v času evropskih volitev leta 2009;
Recommends that the Commission sets up a timetable for adopting a European project on the same day in all the Union countries at the time of the 2009 European elections;
Obdobje za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za vrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji
The period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
Odbor zaprošen za mnenje Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Opinion by Date announced in plenary
Datum imenovanja
Draftswoman Date appointed
Datum sprejetja predlogov
Date adopted
Odbor za pravne zadeve
The Committee on Legal Affairs
UL C 247 E, 16.10.2005, str.
OJ C 247 E, 6.10.2005, p.
88. , ampak bi se poročilo moralo osredotočiti na metodo javne razprave v Uniji med obdobjem za razmislek;
88. , but rather the method of public debate in the Union during the period of reflection;
5. opozarja, da je Ustava že rezultat soglasja, v katerem so bili udeleženi parlamenti in vlade vseh držav članic kot tudi vse evropske institucije;
Recalls that the Constitution is the outcome of a broad consensus involving the parliaments and governments of all Member States and all European institutions;
7. opozarja, da je položaj, v katerem se nahajamo, predviden že v izjavi št. 30 o ratifikaciji Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo z naslednjim besedilom:
Recalls that Declaration No 30 on the ratification of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe caters for the predicament in which we now find ourselves:
8. meni, da je Svet predvidel izvajanje izjave in načel problem s sprejetjem obdobja za razmislek, da bi tako presegli težave, hkrati pa tistim državam članicam, ki bi to želele, omogočili nadaljevanje postopka ratifikacije;
Believes that the Council has anticipated the implementation of the Declaration and addressed the problem by deciding to set a period of reflection to overcome the difficulties, while allowing those Member States which so wish to pursue the ratification process;
10. je prepričan, da mora biti eden od ciljev obdobja za razmislek tudi, kako lahko Evropska unija ponovno pridobi zaupanje državljanov; meni, da je za uspeh potrebna stalna razprava o tem, kako lahko EU izboljša svoje delovanje in kako lahko prispeva k reševanju dejanskih problemov ljudi;
Is convinced that one objective of the period of reflection must be to consider how the European Union can regain the confidence of citizens; believes that in order for this to succeed an ongoing debate is needed on how the EU can boost its performance and how it can contribute to solving people’s real problems;
14. nadalje meni, da je potrebno spodbujati strukturirano, vzajemno in ciljno usmerjeno razpravo, med drugim z evropskimi državljani, civilno družbo, socialnimi partnerji, nacionalnimi parlamenti, političnimi strankami in institucijami EU; s tem v mislih predlaga:
Considers it necessary, furthermore, to pursue a structured, interactive and goal-oriented debate with, among others, European citizens, civil society, the social partners, the national parliaments, the political parties and the institutions of the Union; proposes to this end:
a) naj se kot osnova za razpravo in raziskave pripravi seznam vprašanj in odgovorov s ključnimi vprašanji in odgovori o Ustavi.
(a) as a basis for the debate and surveys, a list of questions and answers should be drawn up, listing key questions and answers about the Constitution.
Politične stranke v državah članicah, predstavniki civilne družbe in druge osebe na odgovornih položajih naj uporabijo ta vprašalnik za izvedbo čim več razprav.
Political parties in the Member States, representatives of civil society and other persons in positions of responsibility should use this questionnaire to conduct as many debates as possible.
Uporablja naj se ga tudi na spletnih straneh;
It should also be used on websites;
b) naj se s pomočjo javnomnenjskih raziskav (EUROBAROMETER) pridobi reprezentativen profil mnenja državljanov o prispevku Ustave in o prihodnosti EU;
(b) a representative profile of the opinions of citizens on the contribution of the Constitution and the future of the Union should be obtained by means of public opinion polls (EUROBAROMETER);
c) da se v vsaki državi članici imenuje skupina oseb, ki te razprave spremlja in pripravi poročilo o stališču državljank in državljanov v njihovi državi članici; to nalogo lahko opravljajo poslanci Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov;
(c) a team should be set up in each Member State to conduct these discussions and to draw up a report on the attitudes of citizens in their Member State; members of the European and national parliaments could play this role;
d) ti poročevalci naj se potem sestanejo na skupni evropski konferenci in poskušajo na podlagi nacionalnih razprav priti do skupnega zaključka;
(d) these rapporteurs should then meet in a joint European conference and endeavour to draw common conclusions from the national debates;
17. meni, da bi se razprava morala osredotočiti tudi na to, kako rešiti težave v Franciji in na Nizozemskem in kako je treba ta dva referenduma obravnavati, da ne bi razočarali prebivalcev Evrope, ki so osnutek Ustave že sprejeli;
Considers that the debate should also consider how to solve the problems in France and the Netherlands and how to deal with these referendums, without deceiving the populations of those EU Member States which have already adopted the draft Constitution;
Mnenje pripravil
Opinion by Date announced in plenary
o obdobju za razmislek: zgradba, teme in okvir za oceno razprave o Evropski uniji
on the period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. izpostavlja strateški pomen Parlamenta pri javni razpravi o ustavi in vztraja na nujnem razvoju oblik sporočanja, ki bodo uspele pritegniti pozornost državljanov;
Emphasises the strategic importance of Parliament in the public debate on the Constitution and the need for forms of communication to be developed which will engage the general public;
5. priznava, da se ratifikacija ustave trenutno sooča z veliki težavami, ki zahtevajo še večji napor nacionalnih vlad in parlamentov, kakor tudi institucij Unije, da bi Unija pridobila sredstva in bi se ustrezno odzvala na trenutne izzivi ter na pričakovanja državljanov, predvsem v boju proti kriminalu in terorizmu, vendar hkrati dosledno spoštovala temeljne svoboščine; meni, da bi se tovrstni program najbolje izvajal znotraj ustavnega okvira;
Recognises that ratification of the Constitution is now beset by serious difficulties that will require the national governments and parliaments, as well as the Union institutions, to redouble their efforts to provide the Union with means of action commensurate with what is at stake and what citizens expect, especially in order to fight crime and terrorism without in any way encroaching on fundamental freedoms; considers that such objectives can best be attained through a Constitution;
- členu 67 Pogodbe ES, predvsem kar zadeva zagotavljanje popolne pristojnosti Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, in
- Article 67 of the EC Treaty, especially as regards the need to confer full jurisdiction on the Court of Justice, and
- členu 42 Pogodbe EU, tako kot je to določbo uvedla Maastrichtska pogodba;
- Article 42 of the EU Treaty, in the form first laid down in the Maastricht Treaty;
Obdobje za razmislek: zgradba, teme in okvir za oceno razprave o Evropski uniji
The period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
Mnenje pripravil Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Committee asked for its opinion Date announced in plenary
Nadomeščeni/-a pripravljavec/-ka mnenja
Draftsman replaced
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in ENAKOST SPOLOV
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality
Odbor za pravice žensk in enakost spolov poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ob upoštevanju izjave Evropskega sveta, po kateri bo ta "ocenil vse razprave v državah članicah in se dogovoril o nadaljnjem postopku" v prvi polovici leta 2006,
A. noting the declaration of the European Council, according to which it will "make an overall assessment of the national debates and agree how to proceed" in the first half of 2006,
B. ker so ženske več kot polovica volivcev v EU, čeprav se redko vključujejo v politično življenje, in ker so njihovi glasovi lahko odločilni,
B. whereas more than half of voters in the EU are women, although they participate little in political life, and whereas their votes can be decisive,
C. ker je načrt D Komisije, ki označuje dialog, debato in demokracijo, namenjen sprožitvi nove evropske debate, v katero ne bodo vključene le evropske in nacionalne institucije, temveč tudi celotna civilna družba, ki jo v veliki meri sestavljajo ženske,
C. whereas the Commission’s plan "D" , which stands for Dialogue, Debate and Democracy, is aimed at launching a new European debate involving not only European and national institutions but also civil society as a whole, of which women form a major part,
D. ker so proces ratifikacije in debate v državah članicah pokazali, da se še posebej mladi zdijo bolj neodločeni glede Ustavne pogodbe in negativno nastrojeni do nje,
D. whereas the ratification process and debates in the Member States have demonstrated that young people in particular appear more undecided about and negative towards the Constitutional Treaty,
4. podpira bolj uravnoteženo zastopanost spolov pri institucionalnem odločanju o prihodnosti Evrope in Ustavni pogodbi, ne le zaradi podpore enakosti spolov, temveč tudi v imenu predstavniške in participativne demokracije;
Supports a more equal gender balance in institutional decision-making regarding the future of Europe and the Constitutional Treaty, not only for the promotion of gender equality, but also in the name of representative and participatory democracy;
10. poziva države članice, da morajo v vsakem dialogu o izgradnji Evrope nujno priznavati kot eno od osnovnih vrednot enakost med ženskami in moškimi, ob zavedanju, da je enakost med spoloma nosilec miru, svobode, pravice in socialnega napredka;
Reminds the Member States that any dialogue on the European venture must necessarily include a recognition, as a fundamental value, of the equality of women and men, in the knowledge that this equality is a vector of peace, freedom, justice and social progress;
Pripravljavka mnenja Datum imenovanja
Draftsperson Date appointed
SC/025 Razmislek: razprava o Evropski uniji
SC/025 Reflection: debate on the European Union
Bruselj, 26. oktober 2005
Brussels, 26 October 2005
Kot institucionalni forum za svetovanje, zastopanje, informiranje in izražanje stališč organizirane civilne družbe na evropski ravni Odbor poudarja, da :
As the institutional forum, at European level, for consulting, representing, informing and expressing the views of organised civil society, the Committee argues that:
- ostajajo temeljni argumenti in analize, ki so privedli do oblikovanja Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo, nespremenjeni;
- the underlying logic and analyses that led to the Constitutional Treaty remain the same;
- je prostislovno dejstvo, da bi z ustavno pogodbo lahko odpravili prav tiste dejavnike, ki so privedli do sedanjih razmer;
- the continued absence of the Constitutional Treaty, which sought to meet the concerns which have led to the current situation, is paradoxical;
- je participativna demokracija, ki jo utemeljuje ustavna pogodba, temeljno sredstvo za krepitev demokratične legitimnost EU;
- participatory democracy, as provided for in the Constitutional Treaty, remains an essential tool to enhance the EU's democratic legitimacy;
- lahko skupna vizija, ki vključuje participativno demokracijo, prispeva k ponovni oživitvi integracijskega procesa;
- a shared vision through participatory democracy can help get the integration process back on the tracks;
- naj zato institucije Evropske unije in države članice začnejo uresničevati načela participativne demokracije, predvsem z anticipativnim uvajanjem ustreznih določb ustavne pogodbe v demokratično življenje Unije;
- the Union's institutions and its member states should therefore start making participatory democracy a reality now, in particular by anticipating the relevant provisions of the Constitutional Treaty on the democratic life of the Union;
- mora Unija spodbuditi pozitivno javno mnenje in poskrbeti, da bo lizbonska strategija obrodila sadove;
- the Union needs to capture the public imagination and it needs to deliver on the Lisbon Strategy;
- je treba k doseženemu napredku na področju dialoga in komunikacije ta področja še dodatno okrepiti.
- communication and dialogue should be enhanced, though much progress has already been made;
- Vendar obširne razprave, ki so jo predvideli voditelji držav in vlad, trenutno v državah članicah večinoma ni mogoče zaznati, a brez njih ni napredka.
- however, the broad debate envisaged by the Heads of State or Government is currently largely absent in the Member States and it will be difficult to make progress in the absence of such debate;
- Čeprav so evropske institucije odgovorne za spodbuditev obširne razprave na evropski ravni, je temeljna odgovornost za slednje v obdobju za razmislek na ramenih držav članic.
- the primary responsibility for the debates during the reflection period lies with the Member States although the European Institutions have an important responsibility to stimulate a wider debate at European level;
- Kljub temu se morajo evropske institucije aktivno vključiti tudi v razprave na nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih ravneh ter podpirati in spodbujati njihovo izvajanje.
- the European Institutions should also engage actively in the debates at national, regional and local level in providing assistance and support in their organisation;
- Organizacije civilne družbe imajo pri tem pomembno podporno vlogo in bi se zato morale vključiti v dejanske razprave na omenjenih ravneh.
- civil society organisations can play an important supportive role and should therefore be involved in genuine local, regional and national dialogue.
obdobju za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji
Reflection period: structure, items and framework for appraisal of the debate on the European Union
Evropski parlament je 6. septembra 2004 sklenil, da v skladu s členom 262 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor zaprosi za mnenje o naslednjem dokumentu:
On 6 September 2005, the European Parliament decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the
Obdobje za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji.
Reflection period: structure, items and framework for appraisal of the debate on the European Union.
Odbor se je v skladu s členom 19 poslovnika odločil, da ustanovi pododbor za pripravo aktivnosti na to temo.
and under Rule 19, paragraph 1 of its Rules of Procedure, the Committee decided to establish a subcommittee to prepare its work on the matter.
Podkomite za razmislek: razprava o Evropski uniji, ki je bil odgovoren za pripravo dela Odbora na to temo, je mnenje sprejel 13. oktobra 2005.
The Subcommittee on Reflection: debate on the European Union, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 13 October 2005.
Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor je mnenje sprejel na 421. plenarnem zasedanju …in … (seja z dne 26. oktobra) s/z … glasovi za, … glasovi proti in … vzdržanimi glasovi.
At its 421st plenary session held on 26 and 27 October 2005 (meeting of 26 October), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 130 votes to 3 with 3 abstentions.
Temeljni argumenti in analize ostanejo nespremenjene
The underlying logic and analyses remain the same
1.1 Argumenti in analize, na podlagi katerih je EESO (28. oktobra 2004)
1.1 The logic and analyses that led the EESC to adopt, with a very large majority its opinion in favour of the Constitutional Treaty (28 October 2004)
CESE 1416/2004 z veliko večino glasov sprejel mnenje o Pogodbi o Ustavi za Evropo ter dejstva in priporočila ostajajo nespremenjeni.
CESE 1416/2004. have not changed, and nor therefore have the arguments and recommendations developed.
Še več, Odbor meni, da so se njegova stališča z nepredvidljivimi zapleti pri procesu ratifikacije ustavne pogodbe le še okrepila.
Indeed, in the Committee's opinion the vagaries of the ratification process of the Constitutional Treaty confirm the validity of the positions it has taken.
1.2 Izidi referenduma v Franciji in na Nizozemskem denimo ne kažejo zgolj na neuspešno komuniciranje držav članic in evropskih institucij s svojimi državljani o dejanski Evropi in o njenem sprejemanju sporazumov, temveč opozarjajo tudi na vrzel med javnostjo in evropskim projektom.
1.2 For example, the referendum results in France and the Netherlands not only demonstrate the failure of the Member States and the European institutions to communicate to the public what Europe is actually about and how it reaches agreements but, they also reveal the gulf separating the public from the European project.
Ta vrzel zagotovo ni značilna le za te države in ni samo rezultat slabe komunikacije ali trenutnega gospodarskega stanja, temveč postavlja pod vprašaj sam sporazum in način sprejetja sporazuma.
It must be said that this gulf is not unique to those countries and is not simply the result of poor communication or the current economic situation, but it does call into question the nature of the agreement itself and thus the way in which it was reached.
1.3 Smiselno je ponoviti “jasna sporočila«, ki bi jih bilo treba po mnenju Odbora iz oktobra 2004, približati civilni družbi:
1.3 It is worthwhile recalling the "clear messages" which, in the Committee's October 2004 opinion, it believed should be got across to civil society:
· metoda Konvencije – korak naprej pri demokratizaciji procesa izgradnje Evrope;
• the use of the instrument of the "Convention", a "step forward in the process of democratising the European venture";
· ustava pomeni "revolucijo" v zgodovini evropske izgradnje;
• the establishment of a Constitution as a "revolutionary" step in the history of the European venture;
· bolj demokratična Unija, ki priznava, da so interesi državljanov bistvenega pomena za izgradnjo Evrope;
• the establishment of a more democratic Union which would recognise that the interests of the people are paramount in the building of Europe;
· Unija, ki bolje ščiti temeljne pravice evropskih državljanov;
• the establishment of a Union which would afford better protection of the fundamental rights of European citizens;