natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poleg tega preuči, ali je potreben predlog instrumenta za nadaljnjo uskladitev zastaralnih rokov, da bi se olajšalo ustrezno delovanje notranjega trga.
It shall further consider whether a proposal for an instrument for the further harmonisation of limitation and prescription periods is necessary to facilitate the proper functioning of the internal market.
Države članice uveljavijo zakone in druge določbe, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najkasneje do 1. septembra 2007 .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 1 September 2007 at the latest.
O tem takoj obvestijo Komisijo.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof .
Države članice uveljavijo potrebne zakone , predpise in upravne ukrepe ali zagotovijo, da stranke v postopku mediacije uveljavijo zahtevane ukrepe prek prostovoljnih sporazumov, pri čemer države članice sprejmejo vse potrebne varnostne ukrepe, da se v vsakem trenutku zagotovi doseganje učinkov, navedenih v tej direktivi, da se doseže uskladitev s to direktivo, najkasneje do 1. septembra 2008, z izjemo člena 8, ki ga bo treba uskladiti do 1. septembra 2009 .
Member States shall bring into force the necessary laws, regulations and administrative measures or ensure that the parties to mediation introduce the requisite measures through voluntary agreements, with the Member States adopting all the precautions needed in order to guarantee at all times that the results indicated in this Directive are achieved, in order to comply with this Directive by 1 September 2008 at the latest , with the exception of Article 8, for which the date of compliance shall be 1 September 2009 .
O teh ukrepih takoj obvestijo Komisijo.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission of these measures .
Direktivo mora biti mogoče izvajati s samoregulacijo.
It must be possible to implement the Directive through self-regulation.
Poročevalka je že od nekdaj prepričana v pomen in koristi, ki jih državljanom prinaša alternativno reševanje sporov, še posebej mediacija.
The rapporteur has always been convinced about the value and interest of alternative dispute resolution, in particular mediation.
Ta je v primerjavi s sodnim postopkom cenejša, hitrejša in manj stresna izbira, pri čemer lahko državljani kot zadnjo možnost še vedno uveljavljajo svojo pravico do sodnega postopka.
It affords a cheaper, quicker and less stressful alternative to court proceedings for citizens, without removing their right to their day in court as a last resort.
Alternativno reševanje sporov strankam v sporu prav tako omogoča, da ohranijo ali celo izboljšajo dragocen odnos, ki bi ga lahko negativen značaj pravdanja ogrozil.
It may also allow parties in dispute to remain in, or even improve, a valuable relationship, which the adversarial nature of litigation might jeopardise.
Nadalje omogoča izvirne rešitve, ki lahko zadovoljijo resnične potrebe strank.
It also allows for creative solutions which satisfy parties' real needs.
Tako si v primerih zdravniške malomarnosti oškodovana stran pogosto želi pojasnila ali opravičila in ji ne gre le za odškodnino.
For instance, in medical negligence cases, the injured party often wants an explanation and an apology just as much as he or she seeks compensation.
Že sam značaj pravdanja po zadovoljitev omenjenih potreb najverjetneje onemogoči.
The very nature of litigation is apt to frustrate those needs.
Poročevalka je sicer sprva dvomila v smiselnost sprejetja direktive v času, ko so sistemi delovanja mediacije vzdolž EU v nekaterih državah članicah še vedno v povojih.
However, the rapporteur initially questioned the need for a directive at a time when mediation systems across the EU are still in an embryonic phase in some Member States.
Vendar pa je poročevalka ob rezultatih ankete, ki jo je objavila na spletnih straneh, in dokazov, ki so jih odboru predstavili strokovnjaki, zaključila, da za sprejetje direktiva obstaja ogromna podpora.
However, as a result of her on-line consultation and the evidence presented by the experts invited to the committee's hearing, the rapporteur recognises that there is overwhelming support for the principle of having a directive.
Ugotavlja, da so bili tudi strokovnjaki, ki so izražali dvom glede direktive ali bili kritični glede njene zakonske podlage, navdušeni nad mediacijo kot alternativnim načinom zagotavljanja dostopa do pravice.
She notes that even those experts who were sceptical about the directive or critical of its legal basis were enthusiastic about mediation as an alternative means of providing access to justice.
Poročevalkin cilj je tako bil oblikovati delujočo in prožno direktivo, ki bi odražala obstoječe smernice in najboljšo prakso in bi lahko spodbujala uporabo mediacije vzdolž EU.
Her objective therefore has been to create a workable, light-touch directive, which reflects existing guidelines and best practice and can serve to encourage the wider use of mediation across the EU.
Poročevalka bi se rada ob tej priložnosti zahvalila strokovnjakom, ki so predstavili dokaze odboru in so bili pripravljeni ponuditi osnutke predlogov, ki jih je nekaj tudi uporabila pri oblikovanju poročila.
She would take this opportunity to thank the experts who took part in their hearing for their willingness to provide drafting suggestions after the hearing, some of which she has drawn upon in drafting the report.
Pri predlogih sprememb se je poročevalka tudi trudila, da bi razjasnila in izboljšala prvotni predlog, še posebej s spremembo opredelitev mediatorja in mediacije.
In the amendments, the rapporteur has sought to clarify and improve on the original proposal, in particular by modifying the definitions of mediator and mediation.
Še zlasti si je prizadevala za zagotovitev spoštovanja standardov kakovosti, in sicer predvsem z navajanjem evropskega kodeksa ravnanja mediatorjev.
She is particularly concerned to ensure that quality standards are ensured, especially by including references to the European Code of Conduct for Mediators.
Prav tako je spremenila določbe o priznavanju in izvrševanju, da bi se zagotovila njihova pravna veljavnost in hkrati upoštevalo pravne tradicije posameznih držav članic.
She has amended the provisions on recognition and enforcement to make sure that they are legally watertight and respect the legal traditions of the various Member States.
Kar zadeva zaupnost, predlagana rešitev ponuja praktičen način reševanja vprašanja, saj daje državam članicam možnost sprejetja strožjih pravil.
As far as confidentiality is concerned, the solution proposed offers a workable way of dealing with this question which affords Member States the latitude to adopt stricter rules if they consider this to be desirable.
Kar zadeva vprašanje pravne osnove, se zdi, da večina držav članic v Svetu zagovarja stališče, da bi morala biti predlagana direktiva omejena na čezmejne primere, kar utemeljujejo s členom 65 Pogodbe ES, ki pravi, da morajo ukrepi za „odpravljanje ovir za nemoten potek civilnih postopkov, po potrebi s spodbujanjem združljivosti predpisov o civilnih postopkih, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah” imeti „čezmejne posledice” in da jih je treba izvajati,v kolikor so „potrebni za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga”.
As far as the question of legal basis is concerned, it would appear that a majority of Member States in the Council take the view that the proposed directive should be limited to cross-border cases on the ground that, under Article 65 of the EC Treaty, measures "eliminating obstacles to the good functioning of civil proceedings, if necessary by promoting the compatibility of the rules on civil procedure applicable in the Member States" have to have "cross-border implications" and to be taken in so far as they are "necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market".
Namen kompromisa, ki ga je predlagala poročevalka, je upoštevati zaskrbljenost držav članic glede izvajanja člena 65 ter hkrati potrošnikom in državljanom nuditi praktične in uporabnikom prijazne načine dostopa do kakovostne mediacije v celotni EU.
The compromise which the rapporteur has put forward is designed to take into account Member States concerns' about the application of Article 65, while giving consumers and citizens in the internal market practical and user-friendly options to have access to a high standard of mediation across the EU.
Poročevalka upa, da bo Svet zavzel razumno stališče glede koristi mediacije in da bodo države članice direktivo izvajale tudi v domačih primerih.
It is hoped that the Council will take a commonsense view of the benefits of mediation and that the directive can also be applied to domestic cases in Member States.
Poročevalka ob koncu še dodaja, da bo pobuda služila oglaševanju in spodbujanju mediacije kot alternativnega načina dostopa do pravice in ponudila okvir za skupna pravila, ki so ravno prav čvrsta, da ščitijo interese strank in hkrati omogočajo rojevanje tržno usmerjenih rešitev.
Lastly, the rapporteur commends this initiative insofar as it will serve to publicise and promote mediation as an alternative means of access to justice and afford a framework of common rules which are sufficiently robust to protect the parties' interests, yet light enough to allow market-driven solutions to emerge.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da vključi v poročilo naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da vse države članice zagotovijo postopek, s katerim lahko sodišče ali javna oblast potrdi poravnavo s sodbo, sklepom ali javnim pooblastilom.
It is therefore necessary to ensure that all Member States provide for a procedure whereby a settlement agreement can be confirmed in a judgment, decision or authentic instrument by a court or public authority.
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da vse države članice zagotovijo postopek, s katerim lahko sodišče ali javna oblast potrdi poravnavo s sodbo, sklepom ali javnim pooblastilom, če zakonodaja na področju civilnega in gospodarskega prava tega ne določa.
It is therefore necessary to ensure that all Member States provide for a procedure whereby a settlement agreement can be confirmed in a judgment, decision or authentic instrument by a court or public authority if legislation in the field of civil or commercial law does not provide for this .
V nekaterih državah članicah je sporazum, dosežen s poravnavo, pravno veljaven brez katere koli sodne odločbe ali javne listine.
In some Member States, an agreement reached through mediation is legally valid without any court decision or instrument.
Zato je nezaželeno prisiliti vse države članice k sprejetju tega postopka.
It is therefore undesirable to compel all Member States to adopt this procedure.
Cilj te direktive je olajšati dostop do reševanja sporov s spodbujanjem prostovoljne uporabe mediacije strank in zagotavljanjem trdnega odnosa med mediacijo in sodnimi postopki.
The objective of this directive is to facilitate access to dispute resolution by promoting the voluntary use of mediation by the parties and by ensuring a sound relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings.
Člen 2, točka (a), alinea 1
Article 2, point (a), subparagraph 1
(a) „mediacija“ pomeni vsak postopek, kakor koli imenovan ali naveden, kjer dvema ali več strankam v sporu pri doseganju sporazuma o reševanju spora pomaga tretja stranka , in ne glede na to, ali postopek začnejo stranke, jim ga je predlagalo ali odredilo sodišče ali ga predpisuje nacionalna zakonodaja države članice.
(a) “Mediation” shall mean any process, however named or referred to, where two or more parties to a dispute are assisted by a third party to reach an agreement on the settlement of the dispute , and regardless of whether the process is initiated by the parties, suggested or ordered by a court or prescribed by the national law of a Member State.
(a) „mediacija“ pomeni postopek , kakor koli imenovan ali naveden, kjer dve ali več strank v sporu namerava doseči sporazum o reševanju njihovega spora s pomočjo posrednika .
(a) “Mediation” shall mean a process, however named or referred to, where two or more parties to a dispute seek to reach an agreement on the settlement of their dispute through a mediator.
Ta postopek lahko začnejo stranke, jim ga predlaga ali odredi sodišče s soglasjem strank ali v skladu z obveznostjo, določeno v nacionalni zakonodaji države članice.
This process may be initiated by the parties, suggested or ordered by a court with the consent of the parties or initiated pursuant to an obligation laid down by the national law of a Member State.
Sodišče lahko v vsakem primeru zahteva, da se stranki udeležita informacijskega sestanka o uporabi mediacije.
The court may in any event require the parties to attend an information session on the use of mediation.
Sodišče lahko zahteva , da se stranki udeležita informacijskega sestanka o uporabi mediacije.
The court may ask the parties to attend an information session on the use of mediation.
Opredelitev v izvirnem besedilu presega meje okvira za določanje značaja predloga direktive in krši načelo subsidiarnosti v zvezi s sodišči.
The formulation in the original text exceeds the bounds of the framework-setting character of the proposal for a directive and violates the subsidiarity principle in respect of the courts.
Ta predlog spremembe pušča odprto možnost za oblikovanje napotnic.
This amendment leaves open the possibility of formulating referrals.
Države članice podpirajo in spodbujajo izobraževanje mediatorjev, da bi zagotovile v sporu, da izberejo mediatorja, ki bo lahko učinkovito vodil mediacijo na način , ki ga stranke pričakujejo .
Member States shall promote and encourage the training of mediators in order to allow parties in dispute to choose a mediator who will be able to effectively conduct a mediation in the manner expected by the parties.
Države članice podpirajo in spodbujajo izobraževanje mediatorjev, da bi zagotovile v sporu, da izberejo mediatorja, ki bo lahko vodil mediacijo učinkovito na odgovoren način in v skladu z upravičenimi pričakovanji strank.
Member States shall promote and encourage the training of mediators in order to allow parties in dispute to choose a mediator who will be able to conduct a mediation effectively, in a responsible manner and in accordance with the justified expectations of the parties.
Mogoče je, da lahko stranke v poravnalni postopek vstopijo s popolnoma nasprotnimi pričakovanji.
It is possible that parties to a mediation procedure may enter into it with completely opposite expectations.
Zato je treba za pripravo tega merila besedilo spremeniti.
The text should therefore be amended to make provision for this criterion.
Dopustnost dokazov v civilnih sodnih postopkih
Admissibility of evidence in civil judicial proceedings
Zaupnost postopka mediacije
Confidentiality of the mediation procedure
V tem členu je treba poudariti zaupnost poravnalnega postopka.
In this article, the emphasis should be on the confidentiality of the mediation procedure.
Zato se med mediacijo pridobljeni podatki ne morejo navesti kot dokaz v sodnih postopkih.
It follows that information obtained through mediation cannot be adduced as evidence in judicial proceedings.
To velja tudi za upravne sodne postopke in ni omejeno na civilne postopke.
This also applies to administrative judicial proceedings, and is not confined to civil proceedings.
Predlog spremembe naslova velja za oba.
The amendment to the heading applies to both.
(a) povabilo s strani stranke k vključitvi v mediacijo ali dejstvo, da je bila stranka pripravljena sodelovati pri mediaciji;
(a) An invitation by a party to engage in mediation or the fact that a party was willing to participate in mediation;
Povabilo ali ponudba s strani stranke h končanju spora z mediacijo ne sme biti vključena v določbe o zaupnosti mediacije.
An invitation or offer by a party to end a dispute through mediation should not be covered by the provisions on the confidentiality of mediation.
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters
LIBE A 27.10.2004
LIBE 27.10.2004
o položaju invalidnih žensk v Evropski uniji
on the situation of women with disabilities in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju konvencije o pravicah invalidov, ki jo je sprejela generalna skupščina Združenih narodov 13. decembra 2006,
– having regard to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities which was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 13 December 2006,
– ob upoštevanju manifesta evropskih invalidnih žensk, ki ga je 22. februarja 1997 sprejel Evropski invalidski forum,
– having regard to the Manifesto of Disabled Women in Europe which was adopted on 22 February 1997 by the European Disability Forum,
– ob upoštevanju listine Evropske unije o temeljnih človekovih pravicah
– having regard to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
– ob upoštevanju evropskega leta enakih možnosti za vse (2007),
– having regard to European Year of Equal Opportunities for All (2007),
– ob upoštevanju člena 13 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
– having regard to Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Enake možnosti za invalide: evropski akcijski načrt“ ( KOM(2003)0650 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled 'Equal Opportunities for People with Disabilities: a European Action Plan' ( COM(2003)0650 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6-0075/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0075/2007 ),
A. ker konvencija Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov priznava, da so invalidne ženske in dekleta v družini ali izven nje pogosto bolj izpostavljene nasilju, poškodbam, zlorabljanju, zapuščenosti, malomarnemu ali slabemu ravnanju in izkoriščanju,
A. whereas in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities it is recognised that women and girls with disabilities are often at greater risk , both within and outside the home, of violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment , maltreatment or exploitation,
B. ker konvencija Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov tudi poudarja, da je treba načelo o enakosti med spoloma vključiti v vsa prizadevanja za spodbujanje polnega uživanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin invalidnih oseb,
B. whereas the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities also emphasises the need to incorporate a gender perspective in all efforts to promote the full enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms by persons with disabilities,
C. ker konvencija Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov vsem invalidnim osebam, ki so dovolj stare za poroko, priznava pravico do poroke in ustvarjanja lastne družine,
C. whereas the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities recognises the right of all persons with disabilities, and who are of marriageable age, to marry and to start a family,
D. ker je skoraj 80 % invalidnih žensk žrtev psihičnega ter telesnega nasilja in ker so v primerjavi z neinvalidnimi ženskami bolj izpostavljene nevarnosti spolnega nasilja; ker nasilje ni le razširjen pojav v življenju invalidnih žensk, temveč je v mnogih primerih tudi razlog za njihovo invalidnost,
D. whereas nearly 80 per cent of women with disabilities are victims of psychological and physical violence and whereas the risk of sexual violence is greater for them than for other women; whereas violence is not only a common feature of the lives of women with disabilities but is also sometimes the actual cause of their disability,
E. ker so invalidne osebe raznolika skupina ljudi, kar je treba upoštevati pri ukrepih, s katerimi se jim pomaga, kot tudi dejstvo, da imajo nekatere podskupine, na primer invalidne ženske, dodatne težave in so žrtve večplastne diskriminacije,
E. whereas persons with disabilities constitute a diverse population group, and actions designed to support them must take into account both this diversity and the fact that some groups, such as women with disabilities, face additional difficulties and multiple discrimination,
F. ker so raziskave v državah članicah pokazale, da so zlasti matere tiste, ki storijo potrebno, da (na zdravstveni, izobraževalni, upravni idr. ravni) najdejo informacije o prizadetosti njihovih otrok in najboljše rešitve za njihovo oskrbo,
F. whereas, according to research carried out by the Member States, it is mothers in particular who take the steps (medical, educational, administrative, etc.) aimed at finding out about their child’s disability and finding the best solutions for tackling it,
G. ker odgovornost za invalidne in odvisne osebe ponavadi sprejmejo ženske, kar v nekaterih primerih, ko ni na voljo ustreznih sprejemnih ustanov, pomeni, da morajo zapustiti trg dela,
G. whereas the responsibility for disabled and dependent persons is usually taken on by women and this means, in certain cases where there are no appropriate reception facilities, that they must leave the labour market,
H. ker morajo tako evropske institucije kot nacionalne in regionalne oblasti spodbujati ukrepe, s katerimi bo enakost med ljudmi postala resnična in učinkovita, in ker mora biti evropsko leto enakih možnosti za vse pri tem gonilna sila,
H. whereas both the EU institutions and the Member States' central and regional authorities should take action designed to ensure that equality for all is something genuine and effective, and whereas the Year of Equal Opportunities for All should serve as a catalyst for this,
I. ker so invalidne ženske žrtve večplastne diskriminacije na podlagi spola, družbene percepcije spola, rase, prizadetosti in invalidnosti ter so bolj izpostavljene revščini in socialni izključenosti,
I. whereas women with disabilities suffer multiple discrimination on the grounds of sex, gender, race, impairment and disability and are more at risk from poverty and social exclusion,
J. ker je enakost obravnavanja invalidnih žensk in mater invalidnih otrok temeljna človekova pravica in etična obveza,
J. whereas equal treatment of women with disabilities and mothers of children with disabilities is a fundamental human right and an ethical obligation,
3. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sprejmejo in izvajajo potrebne ukrepe za pomoč invalidnim ženskam pri napredovanju na področjih družbenega, poklicnega, kulturnega in političnega življenja, kjer so še vedno premalo zastopane;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt and implement the necessary measures to support women with disabilities so that they may progress in those areas of social life and the world of work, culture and politics in which they are still underrepresented;
6. obžaluje, da so invalidne ženske trikrat bolj izpostavljene nasilju kot neinvalidne ženske, zato poziva, naj se program Daphne uporabi tudi za boj proti tej obliki nasilja;
Is shocked at the fact that women with disabilities are three times as likely to be the victims of violence as women without disabilities, and calls therefore for the Daphne Programme also to be used to combat this type of violence;
9. poudarja, da mora Evropska unija sprejeti vse možne ukrepe, vključno z zakonodajnimi, da se izboljšajo sistemi pomoči ter da se invalidnim ženskam in otrokom zagotovi večja finančna pomoč;
Stresses the need for the European Union to take all possible steps, including legislative action, to streamline the aid system and make more funding available for women and children with disabilities;