natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5. v ta namen želi spomniti države članice EU na dejstvo, da se je treba z ustreznimi ukrepi zavzemati za resnično politiko učenja tujih jezikov; poleg tega ponovno poudarja, da je zgodnje učenje jezikov izredno pomembno in bi mora temeljiti na učinkovitih metodah glede na najboljše razpoložljive tehnike;
Reminds the EU Member States, to that end, that it is necessary to take appropriate measures to promote a genuine policy of learning foreign language skills ; furthermore, re-affirms that the early learning of languages is of considerable importance, and should be based on effective methods according to the best available techniques;
10. poziva Komisijo in druge evropske institucije, naj na svojih spletnih straneh na najboljši možni način uporabijo nova digitalna in tehnološka prevajalska orodja, da bi državljanom omogočili dostop do informacij o evropskih zadevah in njihovo prejemanje v njihovem lastnem jeziku;
Calls on the Commission and the other European institutions to make the best possible use of new digital and technological translation tools on their Internet sites so as to enable European citizens to have access to, and obtain from the Internet, information about Europe in their own languages;
17. meni, da bi morala predavanja v programu Erasmus potekati v uradnem jeziku države gostiteljice ali izobraževalnega sistema regije, in bi morali zagotoviti, da bodo študenti programa Erasmus dosegali tako visoko jezikovno usposobljenost, da bodo lahko primerno spremljali predavanja v tem jeziku;
Considers that the language used in Erasmus courses should be the official language of the host country's or region's educational system, and that it should be ensured that Erasmus students attain a level of proficiency in that language which enables them to properly follow courses provided in that language;
19. podpira predlog za večjezičnost v informacijski družbi ter za ustvarjanje in širjenje večjezičnih vsebin in znanja; obstaja vedno večjo nabor tehnologij, ki bodo pripomogle k povečani rabi vseh jezikov, vključno z manj razširjenimi; tehnologija nudi največje možnosti za zagotavljanje jezikovnega prostora vsem evropskim jezikom;
Supports the proposals for multilingualism in the information society and the creation and circulation of multilingual content and knowledge; there is an increasing array of technologies that will help a greater use of all languages, including those less widely used; technology offers the greatest potential for ensuring social linguistic space for all of Europe’s languages;
Predlagani ukrepi
Proposed Measures
26. poziva Komisijo, naj olajša in širi dostop do informacij in financiranja organizacij kandidatk, katerih cilj je širjenje večjezičnosti preko mrež in/ali projektov, ki jih bo od leta 2007 financirala Komisija;
Calls on the Commission to facilitate and promote access to information and funding for applicant bodies seeking to promote multilingualism through networks and/or projects funded by the Commission from 2007 onwards;
Povzetek sporočila
Summary of the Communication
Komisija v sporočilu potrdi svojo zavezanost k večjezičnosti in predlaga podrobne ukrepe.
The Communication reaffirms the Commission’s commitment to multilingualism and proposes specific actions.
Upošteva, da EU temelji na "enotnosti v raznolikosti" in da v EU poleg 21 "uradnih" jezikov obstaja še približno 60 avtohtonih jezikov, poleg tega pa še jeziki priseljencev.
They note that the EU is founded on ‘unity in diversity’ and that besides the 21 ‘official’ languages of the EU there are around 60 indigenous languages plus migrant languages.
Ta raznolikost velja za "izvor blaginje", ki vodi k "večji solidarnosti" in "medsebojnemu razumevanju",
This diversity is considered a ‘source of wealth’ leading to ‘greater solidarity’ and ‘mutual understanding’.
Glede na uporabljeno opredelitev večjezičnost, ki vključuje "sobivanje različnih jezikovnih skupnosti na enem zemljepisnem območju", Komisija predlaga politiko, ki "krepi ozračje, ki vodi do tega, da so popolnoma izraženi vsi jeziki, v katerih lahko uspešno poteka poučevanje in učenje različnih jezikov."
Referring to their definition of multilingualism which includes ‘the co-existence of different language communities in one geographical area’ they propose policies which seek to ‘promote a climate that is conducive to the full expression of all languages, in which the teaching and learning of a variety of languages can flourish.’
V zvezi z manj razširjenimi jeziki Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila sama glavni finančni vir Evropskega urada za manj uporabljane jezike in mreže Mercator.
Referring to lesser-used languages, the Commission notes that it has been the main financial support for the European Bureau for Lesser-Used Languages (EBLUL) and the Mercator network.
Figela na nedavni konferenci o regionalnih in manjšinskih jezikih v izobraževanju razvidna večja verjetnost, da se bo to zdaj zgodilo.
However, Mr Figel’s speech at the recent conference on RMLs in education suggested that this was now more likely to go ahead.
Med predlogi je izpostavljeno, da bodo za spodbujanje večjezičnosti potrebni "nacionalni načrti" in z bolj malo zanosa, da bi bilo "poučevanje regionalnih in manjšinskih jezikov prav tako treba ustrezno upoštevati".
Amongst the proposals they outline that ‘national plans’ will be needed to promote multilingualism and rather half-heartedly that ‘the teaching of regional or minority languages should also be taken into account as appropriate’.
Poleg tega je naveden seznam želenih ukrepov, vključno z rabo novih tehnologij, novim evropskim kazalnikom znanja jezika, študijo najboljših praks, raziskavami in večjo rabo poučevanja nejezikovnih predmetov v tujem jeziku ( Content and Language Integrated Learning ).
In addition, they list a number of welcome measures including the use of new technologies, a new EU Indicator of Language competence, a best practice study, research, and the greater usage of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).
V tretjem delu je govora o večjezičnem gospodarstvu ter o tem, kako jezikovne spretnosti in znanje pripomorejo k bolj konkurenčni EU in kako je govoriti jezik svojih klientov koristno za posel.
Section III turns to the multilingual economy and how language skills make the EU more competitive and recognising that speaking your customer's language is good for business.
Zdi se, da je besedilo usmerjeno le na "uradne jezike".
The text appears to be aimed at ‘official languages only’.
Četrti del izpostavlja večjezičnost v odnosih Komisije z državljani.
Section IV highlights multilingualism in the Commission’s relations with citizens.
Ker EU sprejema zakonodajo, ki je za njene državljane neposredno zavezujoča, bi za "legitimnost in preglednost Unije moral biti prvi pogoj, da morajo biti državljani sposobni sporazumevati se z njenimi institucijami in imeti na voljo zakonodajo EU v svojem "nacionalnem" jeziku ter sodelovati pri v evropskem projektu brez kakršnih koli jezikovnih ovir."
Because the EU adopts legislation that is directly binding on its citizens, it is therefore pre-requisite for the Unions’ legitimacy and transparency that citizens should be able to communicate with its institutions and read EU law in their own, what they term, ‘national’ language, and be able to take part in the European project ‘without encountering any language barriers.’
Čeprav je stališče hvalevredno, se zdi, da to velja le za "uradne" jezike.
However, while commendable, this appears to only include ‘official’ languages.
Trditev, da imajo vsi državljani splošen dostop do evropskih projektov, je napačna, saj to ne velja za nedržavne in regionalne jeziki, čeprav nekatere izmed njih govori več govorcev kot določene jezike držav članic.
It is mistake when they say that all citizens have universal access to the EU project when stateless and regional languages, some of which have more speakers than member state languages, are in fact excluded.
Neverjetno je, da medtem, ko se EU trudi približati državljanov, deluje tako, da jih 10 %
It is incredible that when the EU is seeking to get closer to its citizens it excludes to exclude 10%
V Evropi je približno 46 milijonov govorcev regionalnih in manjšinskih jezikov, kar predstavlja približno 10% prebivalstva EU. že izhodiščno izloči, ker nima jezikovne politike, ki bi vključevala vse.
There are around 46 million RML speakers in Europe, making up some 10% of the EU population. of them at the outset because of the lack of an inclusive language policy.
Drugače so podani predlogi pozitivni, vendar le pod pogojem, da vključujejo "regionalne" ali manjšinske jezike (RMJ).
Otherwise the proposals outlined are welcome, but only if they include 'Regional' or Minority Language (RMLs).
Razmišljanja o pravi večjezičnosti
Considerations on real multilingualism
Poleg tega je neuspeh evropske ustave, ki je vsebovala nekaj določb o zagotavljanju podpore manj razširjenim jezikom, premalo priznan z vidika vpliva, ki ga bo imel za širjenje teh jezikov in doseganje pravic za njegove govorce.
Furthermore, the failure of the EU Constitution, which contained several clauses ensuring support for Lesser-Used Language (LUL), has not been sufficiently recognised for its impact on the promotion of LUL languages and achieving rights for those languages.
Čas je, da se ponovno oceni taktiko brez osnutka ustave, zaradi česar so manj uporabljani jeziki ostali brez prave pravne podlage za širjenje in za financiranje.
It is now time to reassess tactics without the draft constitution, a scenario which has left LUL without any proper legal base for campaigning or for funding.
To pomeni, da se morajo nevladne organizacije, kot je Evropski urad za manj uporabljane jezike, osredotočiti na nove načine zagotavljanja pomembne jezikovne raznolikosti.
It means that NGOs such as EBLUL now has to focus on new ways to ensure meaningful linguistic diversity.
Poleg že obstoječih mednarodnih pogodb, kot sta Evropska listina Sveta Evrope za regionalne in manjšinske jezike in Okvirna konvencija Sveta Evrope za zaščito narodnostnih manjšin, je potrebno sprejeti zavezujočo zakonodajo, s katero bi se zaščitili govorci manj uporabljanih jezikov, tako individualno kot kolektivno, da bi svoj jezik lahko uporabljali v vsakodnevnem življenju, imeli pravico izobrazbe v njem in da bi bili zaščiteni pred sovražnimi državami članicami, katerih politike ogrožajo manj uporabljane jezike in ki si prizadevajo asimilirati narode brez držav in/ali narodnostne manjšine.
What is needed above and beyond existing international treaties such as the Council of Europe European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages and Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, is binding legislation that enshrines the rights LUL speakers, both individually and collectively, to conduct their lives in their language, the right to receive education in their language and the right to protection from hostile member states who's policies threaten LULs and act to assimilate the stateless nation and/or national minority.
Nedavne raziskave ponazarjajo, da je prisotnost regionalnega ali manjšinskega jezika za državo gospodarsko koristna.
Recent research illustrates that having a RML in a state is economically beneficial to that state.
Temelječ na prednostih manj razširjenih jezikov ali dvojezičnosti v uradnih jezikih, raziskava pokaže, da imajo dvojezični ljudje večje kognitivne sposobnosti in sestavljajo populacijo z nadpovprečnimi spretnostmi.
Based on the advantages of LUL / official language bilingualism, the research shows how bilingual people have greater cognitive abilities and give a population with enhanced skills.
Vlaganja v dvojezičnost in večjezičnost je torej vlaganje v socialni kapital.
Investing in bilingualism and multilingualism is therefore a social capital investment.
Čeprav je dobronamerno in vsebuje nekaj dobrodošlih inovativnih predlogov, sporočilo v najboljšem primeru ostaja dvoumno pri vprašanju neuradnih jezikov, v najslabšem pa zanemarja mučne razmere nekaterih ogroženih evropskih jezikov.
The Communication, while well meaning and with several welcome innovative proposals, remains ambiguous on the issue of non-official languages at best and at worst neglects the plight of several European languages that are endangered .
Poleg tega z vidika jezikovnega načrtovanja in razvoja ne prinaša jasnega napredka pri vprašanju vzpostavljanja smiselne jezikovne raznolikosti, ki je kot osrednja vrednota EU ključna, če EU želi doseči pravo večjezičnost.
In addition, from the point of view of language planning and development it fails to make any clear progress on the matter of establishing meaningful linguistic diversity which, as a core EU value, is essential if the EU is aiming to achieve real multilingualism .
Obstoječi predpisi o pridobivanju financiranja EU izključujejo manjše jezikovne skupine, države članice in druge.
The actual rules to gain EU funding act to exclude smaller language groups, member state or otherwise.
Izhajajoče iz akcijskega načrta sporočilo o večjezičnosti naznanja končni odločni rez z zamislijo dodelitve namenskih sredstev za projekte manj razširjenih jezikov, kar jih bo še bolj marginaliziralo, še zlasti najbolj ogrožene.
Following from the Action Plan, the Communication on Multilingualism signals a final clean break with any notion of ring-fenced funding for lesser-used language projects , a scenario that will effectively further marginalise lesser-used languages, especially those most endangered.
Predlog Komisije naznanja preusmeritev od politike EU izpred leta 2000, ko je neposredno podpirala manj razširjene jezike (iz proračunske postavke B) k položaju, ko morajo manjšinske jezikovne skupnosti z "velikimi" jeziki tekmovati na odprtem trgu.
The Commission's proposals signal a paradigm shift away from earlier pre-2000 EU policy of direct support for lesser-used languages (with the B-line budget) to one where minoritised language communities have to compete on the ‘open market’ with the big languages.
Nejasno ostaja, kako naj bodo pri tem uspešni.
How they are meant to achieve this remains unclear.
Dodeljevanje dotacij se mora sorazmerno z višino dotacije administrativno poenostaviti, pri dodelitvi sredstev se mora izvajati dejavna politika v korist manj razširjenih jezikov in treba jih je ponovno neposredno in namensko financirati (tudi vnaprej), ne le sofinancirati.
There needs to be administrative simplification over grant applications proportionate to grant size, a proactive policy in favour of LULs in the allocation of funds and the return of ring-fenced, direct funding (including pre-funding) without co-financing.
Poleg tega manj razširjeni jeziki z razvojem informacijske tehnologije izgubljajo pri financiranju, saj je poudarek bolj na bolj razširjenih jezikih.
In addition, with IT developments, all Less Widely Used Language (LWULs) miss out on funding because of the emphasis on the more widely spoken languages.
Če smo, kot pravi komisar Figel, "zaradi jezika ljudje", manj razširjeni jeziki potrebujejo temu primeren status.
If 'language make us human' as Commissioner Figel states, LULs and their speakers need the status that goes with that statement.
Če EU verjame v slogane o enotnosti v raznolikosti in enakosti vseh jezikov, sta potrebni skladna in smiselna jezikovna politika in zakonodaja EU z jezikovnimi pravicami, ki evropskim jezikom zagotavljajo zaščito in družbeni jezikovni prostor za prost razvoj.
If the EU believes in the slogans Unity in Diversity and that all languages are equal then there is a need for a coherent, meaningful EU language policy and legislation enshrined language rights to ensure all European languages are protected and are given the social linguistic space in which to thrive.
Jezikovna pravila in uredbe sicer obstajajo, a do danes ne obstaja zavezujoča jezikovna politika EU niti na ravni institucij niti držav članic.
While there are language rules and regulations there is to date no coherent legally binding language policy for the EU either at the level of the institutions or in member states.
Človekove jezikovne pravice so v različnih delih EU predpisane različno.
Human language rights provision is uneven across the EU.
To nepravilnost še dodatno krepi način, na katerega morajo države pristopnice zadovoljiti merila minimalnih pravic manj razširjenih jezikov in narodnostnih manjšin.
This anomaly is further enhanced in the way that the accession states have to satisfy minimal lesser used language rights and national minority criteria.
Obstajajo pa tudi "stare" države članice, ki teh meril, če bi šele kandidirale za članstvo, niti približno ne bi izpolnjevale.
Yet, there are ‘old’ member states who, if they were in the process of applying for the EU today, would completely fail to meet these criteria.
Ni pravilno in krivično je, da ima EU dvojna merila v odnosu do novih držav članic, krivično pa je tudi do skupnosti, ki govorijo regionalne ali manjšinske jezike.
It is an anomaly that is unfair to the new member states and unfair to RML communities plus it illustrates EU double standards.
Za obsežnejšo večjezičnosti je potrebna dejavna politika v korist evropskih manj razširjenih jezikov , vključno z jeziki držav članic, kot sta Estonija in Danska, ter tudi nacionalnih jezikov, kot sta baskovščina in valizijski jezik.
For greater multilingualism is that there are proactive policies in favour of Europe’s less widely used languages including Member State languages such as Estonian and Danish, as well as national languages such as Basque and Welsh.
Ničemur ne koristi, kar prizna tudi Komisija, da je več ljudi govori več jezikov, če je njihov drugi ali tretji jezik angleščina.
It's not much use, as the Commission recognises that more people are multilingual but when their second or third language is English.
To vodi k še večji prevladi in krepitvi rabe angleščine kot lingue france EU.
This will lead to an even greater pre-dominance and reinforcement of the use of English as the EU’s lingua franca .
Vzpodbujati bi bilo treba na primer učenje jezikov izven svoje jezikovne skupine, kot recimo učenje poljščine med Valižani itd.
What it should be encouraging, for example, is where people are able learn languages from outside their language group such as Welsh speakers learning Polish.
Poleg tega je treba oblikovati seznam ogroženih evropskih jezikov , da se prepoznajo pomoči najbolj potrebni jeziki in da z dejavno politiko prejmejo največ pomoči.
In addition, an endangered European language list needs to be established so that the languages most in need can be identified and, with proactive policies, receive the most help.
Potrebno je ustanoviti funkcijo jezikovnega varuha EU po vzgledu kanadskega komisarja za jezike.
There is a need for a EU Language Ombudsman to follow the Canadian Language Commissioner model.
Kljub nasprotovanju Komisije Evropski agenciji za učenje jezikov in jezikovno raznolikost , je vredno vztrajati pri ustanovitve agencije, preimenovane v Agencijo za večjezičnost.
Despite the Commission's dismissal of the Agency on Linguistic Diversity and Language Learning, it is worth insisting again in its creation, retitled as an Agency for Multilingualism .
Med njene naloge naj bi spadala tudi vzpostavitev mreže centrov, specializiranih za raziskave in širjenje jezikovne raznolikosti.
Part of its remit would include the setting up of a network on centres specialised in research and promotion of linguistic diversity .
Vsi evropski jeziki bi morali v EU postati uradni.
All European languages should be made official in the EU .
To bi bil del jezikovnega načrta EU in bi se lahko doseglo z zmanjšanjem števila delovnih jezikov v EU, kar se v praksi pravzaprav že dogaja.
This would be part of an EU language plan and may be achieved by reducing the number of full working languages in the EU as is de facto already the situation.
Uporaba zgolj državnih jezikov članic ni sprejemljiva.
Simply having member state languages only is not acceptable.
Uradni status nekega jezika pomeni jasno sporočilo državljanom EU, da se jih obravnava enakopravno in lahko samo pripomore k boljšemu stiku EU z njenimi državljani.
Official status for one’s language sends out a clear message to all EU citizens that they are to be treated equally and can only act to better connect the EU with its citizens.
Približno 10 % prebivalcev EU (46 milijonov), govorcev regionalnih in manjšinskih jezikov, je v stiku z EU prisiljenih uporabljati jezik države članice in ne svoj materni jezik.
Some 10% (46 million) of the EU’s population, the EU’s RML language speakers, are compelled to use their Member State language and not their mother-tongue when dealing with the EU.
V sporočilu je trditev, da bi državljani morali imeti možnost komuniciranja z EU "v njihovih nacionalnih jezikih" in sodelovati v evropskem projektu "brez kakršnih koli jezikovnih ovir", vendar je takoj ovržena zaradi omejevanja teh jezikov na zgolj uradne
The Communication stipulates that citizens should be able to communicate to the EU ‘in their own national language’ and take part in the EU project ‘without encountering any language barriers’, yet it immediately contradicts itself by restricting these languages to official
Jezike, ki jih uporablja EU, trenutno opredeljujejo pravilo št. 1 Pogodbe EGS iz leta 1958. jezike držav članic.
Languages to be used in the EU are currently determined by rule No. 1 of the 1958 EEC Treaty. member state languages only.
Z enim zamahom je izključena ena desetina prebivalcev EU.
It excludes some 10% of the EU population at a stroke.
Valizijski jezik je nacionalni jezik Valižanov, baskovščina je jezik Baskov, vendar ta dva jezika ne smeta biti uporabljana.
Welsh is the national language of Wales, Basque the language of the Basque nation, but they cannot be used.
Da bi pridobila demokratično legitimnost in postala pregleda, mora biti EU dostopna vsem svojim državljanom in evropskih jezikom.
To achieve democratic legitimacy and transparency the EU must be accessible to its all of its citizens in all European languages.
Če to drži, ta opredelitev ni sprejemljiva.
If so, this definition is unacceptable.
Nova okvirna strategija za večjezičnost
New framework strategy for multilingualism
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju politike morskega okolja (Direktiva o morski strategiji)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Framework for Community Action in the field of Marine Environmental Policy (Marine Strategy Directive)
MNENJE Odbora za ribištvo ........................................................................................45
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................49
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0505 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0505 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 175(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0346/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0346/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in mnenja Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0373/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0373/2006 ),
(1a) Evropo obdajajo štiri morja: Sredozemsko, Baltsko, Severno in Črno, ter dva oceana: Atlantski in Arktični.
(1a) Europe is surrounded by four seas - the Mediterranean, the Baltic, the North Sea and the Black Sea; and by two oceans - the Atlantic and the Arctic .
(1b) Kopensko ozemlje Skupnosti je v resnici polotok z obalami, ki merijo na tisoče kilometrov, morsko ozemlje Skupnosti pa je večje od njegovega kopenskega dela.
(1b) The Community’s land territory effectively constitutes a peninsula with a coastline thousands of kilometres long, and the Community’s marine territory is larger than its land territory.