natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za namene izračunavanja prilagoditev za nestanovitnost, če so taki finančni instrumenti ali blago , ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev iz priloge VIII Direktive [2000/12/EC], posojeni, prodani ali zagotovljeni, ali izposojeni, kupljeni ali prejeti kot zavarovanje ali kako drugače, institucija pa uporablja pristop „nadzorniških“ prilagoditev za nestanovitnost iz dela 3 priloge VIII Direktive [2000/12/EC], se v okviru takega posla taki instrumenti in borzno blago obravnavajo na enak način kot lastniški vrednostni papirji, ki niso uvrščeni v glavnem indeksu, so pa uvrščeni na priznani borzi.
For the purposes of calculating volatility adjustments where such financial instruments or commodities which are not eligible under Annex VIII of Directive [2000/12/EC] are lent, sold or provided, or borrowed, purchased or received by way of collateral, or otherwise under such a transaction , and the institution is using the Supervisory volatility adjustments approach under Annex VIII, part 3 of Directive [2000/12/EC], such instruments and commodities shall be treated in the same way as non-main index equities listed on a recognised exchange.
Če institucije uporabljajo pristop lastnih ocen prilagoditev za nestanovitnost iz dela III priloge VIII Direktive [2000/12/EC] v zvezi s finančnimi instrumenti ali blagom, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev iz priloge VIII Direktive [2000/12/EC], je treba prilagoditev za nestanovitnost izračunati za vsako posamezno postavko.
Where institutions are using the Own Estimates of Volatility Adjustments Approach under Annex VIII, part 3 of Directive [2000/12/EC] in respect of financial instruments or commodities which are not eligible under Annex VIII of Directive [2000/12/EC] volatility adjustments must be calculated for each individual item.
Institucije, ki uporabljajo pristop internih modelov, opredeljen v delu 3 priloge VII Direktive [2000/12/EC], lahko ta pristop uporabijo tudi v tržni knjigi.
Where institutions are using the Internal Models Approach defined at Annex VII, Part 3 of Directive [2000/12/EC], they may also apply this approach in the trading book.
Priloga II, odstavek 9, točka b
Annex II, paragraph 9, point (b)
b) vse postavke, ki so posojene, prodane ali zagotovljene, ali izposojene, kupljene ali prejete v okviru poslov, se lahko priznajo kot primerno zavarovanje s finančnim premoženjem v skladu s pododdelkom 3 oddelka 3 poglavja 2 naslova V Direktive [2000/12/ES] brez uporabe odstavka 8 te priloge.
(b) any items lent, sold or provided, or borrowed, purchased or received under the transactions may be recognised as eligible financial collateral under Title V, Chapter 2, Section 3, Sub-section 3 of Directive [2000/12/EC] without the application of paragraph 8 of this Annex.
b) vse postavke, ki so izposojene, kupljene ali prejete v okviru poslov, se lahko priznajo kot primerno zavarovanje s finančnim premoženjem v skladu s pododdelkom 3 oddelka 3 poglavja 2 naslova V Direktive [2000/12/ES] brez uporabe odstavka 8 te priloge.
(b) any items borrowed, purchased or received under the transactions may be recognised as eligible financial collateral under Title V, Chapter 2, Section 3, Subsection 3 of Directive [2000/12/EC] without the application of paragraph 8 of this Annex.
Poročevalec podpira predlog spremembe Sveta se zaradi razjasnitve.
The rapporteur favours the amendment proposed by the Council for clarification.
Priloga V, odstavek 13, pododstavek 4
Annex V, paragraph 13, subparagraph 4
Za investicijski sklad se upoštevajo dejanske pozicije v tuji valuti investicijskega sklada.
For CIUs the actual foreign exchange positions of the CIU shall be taken into account.
Institucije se lahko zanesejo na poročanje tretje stranke o pozicijah v tuji valuti v investicijskem skladu, pri čemer se ustrezno zagotovi pravilnost tega poročila.
Institutions may rely on third party reporting of the foreign exchange position in the CIU, where the correctness of this report is adequately ensured.
Če institucija ni zmožna oceniti pozicij v tuji valuti v enotah premoženja investicijskega sklada, se predpostavlja, da je investicijski sklad v skladu z naložbeno politiko investicijskega sklada investiral do največjega dovoljenega obsega v tuji valuti, tako da institucije za pozicije iz tržne knjige upoštevajo največjo posredno izpostavljenost, ki bi jo lahko dosegle s pozicijami s finančnim vzvodom pri izračunavanju svoje kapitalske zahteve za valutno tveganje .
If an institution is not aware of the foreign exchange positions in a CIU, it shall be assumed that the CIU is invested up to the maximum extent allowed under the CIU’s mandate in foreign exchange and institutions shall, for trading book positions, take account of the maximum indirect exposure that they could achieve by taking leveraged positions through the CIU when calculating their capital requirement for foreign exchange risk.
To opravijo tako, da pozicijo v investicijskem skladu sorazmerno povečajo do največje izpostavljenosti do osnovnih naložbenih postavk, ki izhajajo iz naložbenega mandata.
This shall be done by proportionally increasing the position in the CIU up to the maximum exposure to the underlying investment items resulting from the investment mandate.
Predpostavljena pozicija investicijskem skladu v tuji valuti se obravnava kot ločena valuta v skladu z obravnavo naložb v zlatu.
The assumed position of the CIU in foreign exchange shall be treated as a separate currency according to the treatment of investments in gold.
Če pa je na voljo smer naložbe investicijskega sklada, se lahko skupna dolga pozicija doda skupni dolgi odprti poziciji v tuji valuti, skupna kratka pozicija pa se lahko doda skupni kratki odprti poziciji v tuji valuti.
If, however, the direction of the CIU’s investment is available, the total long position may be added to that the total long open foreign exchange position and the total short position may be added to the total short open foreign exchange position.
Pred izračunom ni dovoljeno nikakršno pobotanje med takimi pozicijami.
There would be no netting allowed between such positions prior to the calculation .
Priloga VII, del B, odstavek 2, točka (b)
Annex VII, Part B, paragraph 2, point (b)
(b) jasno in neodvisno (tj. neodvisno od trgovalne enote) poročanje za oddelek, ki je odgovoren za proces vrednotenja .
(b) clear and independent (i.e. independent of front office) reporting lines for the department accountable for the valuation process.
(b) jasno poročanje za oddelek, ki je odgovoren za proces preverjanja .
(b) clear reporting lines for the department accountable for the verification process.
Priloga VII, del B, odstavek 6, točka b
Annex VII, Part B, paragraph 6, point (b)
b) vhodni tržni podatki so po možnosti usklajeni s tržnimi cenami, primernost vhodnih tržnih podatkov določene pozicije, ki se vrednoti, in parametri modela, pa se ocenjujejo dnevno ;
(b) market inputs shall be sourced, where possible, in line with market prices, and the appropriateness of the market inputs of the particular position being valued and the parameters of the model shall be assessed on a daily basis;
b) vhodni tržni podatki so po možnosti usklajeni s tržnimi cenami, primernost vhodnih tržnih podatkov določene pozicije, ki se vrednoti, in parametri modela, pa se ocenjujejo pogosto ;
(b) market inputs shall be sourced, where possible, in line with market prices, and the appropriateness of the market inputs of the particular position being valued and the parameters of the model shall be assessed on a frequent basis;
zaOdbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve
for the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
Po baselskem sporazumu iz leta 1988 (Basel I) je več kot 100 držav sprejelo minimalne kapitalske zahteve.
The Basel Accord in 1988 (Basel I) led to the adoption of minimum capital requirements across over 100 countries.
Evropska unija je, med drugim, sprejela Direktivo 2000/12/ES, s katero je konsolidirala dotedanje direktive, ki so urejale stopnje solventnosti kreditnih institucij in obravnavale tveganje, ki ga imajo te institucije na podlagi kreditnih dejavnosti.
The European Union adopted, inter alia , Directive 2000/12/EC which consolidated previous directives regulating solvency ratios for credit institutions and addressed their risk arising from lending activities.
Z direktivo 93/6/EGS o kapitalski ustreznosti investicijskih družb in kreditnih institucij so se pravila tako o kreditnem kot tudi o tržnem tveganju razširila na investicijske družbe.
Directive 93/6/EEC on the capital adequacy of investment firms and credit institutions extended both the credit risk and market risk rules to investment firms.
Z novimi predlogi (za izvajanje baselskega sporazuma - Basel II - v Evropski uniji) naj bi odpravili doslej ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti ter zagotovili tesnejšo povezanost kapitala finančnih institucij s tveganji, s katerimi se soočajo, in v njih je navedeno, kako se zahteve uporabljajo v posameznih investicijskih družbah, skupinah investicijskih družb in mešanih družbe.
The new proposals (implementing in the European Union the new Basel Accord - Basel II) aim at eliminating the shortcomings that were identified so far, ensuring that financial institutions' capital is more closely aligned with the risk they face, and specifies how the requirements apply to individual investment firms, groups of investment firms and mixed groups.
Vaša poročevalka želi izraziti podporo večini ciljev predlogov in nujni posodobitvi, ki tudi ustrezajo znatnemu napredku v tehnikah merjenja in upravljanja tveganja finančnih storitev.
Your rapporteur wishes to express her support for the major objectives of the proposals and the necessary updating of the rules in response to the significant advances in techniques for risk measurement and management in financial services.
Ne glede na to želi poročevalka predlagati nekatere spremembe, ki bi lahko prispevali k poenostavitvi sistema kapitalskih zahtev.
However, the rapporteur would like to propose some amendments which can contribute to the simplification of the capital requirements system.
Nekateri predlogi sprememb so bili podani v zvezi z načini nacionalne presoje, ki jih je treba odpraviti zaradi krepitve usklajene ureditve na notranjem trgu.
Several of them relate to instances of national discretion that should be deleted in order to enhance regulatory harmonisation in the internal market.
Veliko teh črtanj so priporočili tudi nacionalni nadzorniki v CEBS.
Many of those deletions are also recommended by the national supervisors in the CEBS.
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom 2002/C 77/01 je v predlogu uporabljen postopek "ponovnega sprejema“, ki omogoča bistvene spremembe obstoječe zakonodaje brez samostojne direktive, ki bi spremenila obstoječo.
The proposal applies the 're-casting technique', in accordance with Interinstitutional Agreement 2002/C 77/01, permitting substantive amendments to existing legislation without a self-standing amending directive.
Vaša poročevalka meni, da je člen 47(2) Pogodbe o ES ustrezno izbrana pravna podlaga za ta predlog.
Your rapporteur takes the view that Article 47(2) of the EC Treaty is properly chosen as the legal basis for this proposal.
Upoštevano je načelo subsidiarnosti, saj je direktiva najustreznejši instrument za dosego zastavljenih ciljev.
The principle of subsidiarity is respected, as the directive is the most appropriate instrument to achieve the objectives pursued.
Upoštevano je tudi načelo sorazmernosti, saj so direktive omejene na nujno potrebno.
Having the directives confined to the necessary requirements, the principle of proportionality is also observed.
Vseeno je treba opozoriti, da je bil dogovor o sporazumu Basel II sprejet zunaj zakonodajnih postopkov Evropske skupnosti, kar bi lahko privedlo do dvomov o demokratičnem mandatu predloga.
However, it must be noted that Basel II was agreed outside the legislative procedures of the European Community, which might justify doubts about the democratic mandate of the proposal.
Glede na spremembe Direktive 2000/12/ES to posebno velja za predlagane spremembe izvršilne pristojnosti, po kateri ima Komisija pravico do spremembe členov 56–67 o lastnih virih sredstev (oddelek I poglavja 2).
With regard to the re-casting of Directive 2000/12/EC, this is especially relevant for changes proposed to the powers of execution, where the Commission is entitled to amend Articles 56-67 regulating own funds (Section I of Chapter 2), among other issues.
V primeru Direktive 93/6/EGS ima Komisija med drugim pravico spremeniti kategorije investicijskih družb po členu 20(2) in (3) ter tehnične določbe iz Prilog I do VII.
In the case of Directive 93/6/EEC, the Commission is entitled inter alia to amend the categories of investment firms in Article 20(2) and (3) as well as technical provisions in Annexes I to VII.
Zaradi zagotovitve ustreznega nadzora nad naslednjimi osnovnimi predpisi, je treba uvesti ustrezen komitološki sistem, vključno s tako imenovano klavzulo o časovni omejitvi, ki je že bila uporabljena, na primer, v Direktivi 2003/6/ES o zlorabi trga.
In order to ensure proper control over the subsequent changes to the substantive regulation, it is thus necessary to introduce the appropriate comitology system, including the so-called 'sunset clause' already used, for example, in Directive 2003/6/EC on market abuse.
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
PREDLOGI SPREMEMB K PREDLOGU 1
AMENDMENTS TO PROPOSAL 1
Uvodna izjava 63 a (novo)
Recital 63 a (new)
(63a) Evropski parlament bi moral razpolagati z obdobjem treh mesecev od prvega prenosa osnutka sprememb in izvedbenih ukrepov, zato da slednje preuči in predloži svoje mnenje o njih.
(63a) The European Parliament should be given a period of three months from the first transmission of draft amendments and implementing measures to allow it to examine them and to give its opinion.
V nujnih in ustrezno utemeljenih primerih bi morala obstajati možnost za skrajšanje tega obdobja.
However, in urgent and duly justified cases, it should be possible to shorten this period.
Če Evropski parlament v tem obdobju sprejme resolucijo, mora Komisija ponovno preučiti predlagane spremembe ali ukrepe.
If, within that period, a resolution is adopted by the European Parliament, the Commission should re-examine the draft amendments or measures,
S to uvodno izjavo naj bi zaščitili pristojnost Evropskega parlamenta v komitološkem postopku po spremenjenem členu 151.
This recital seeks to protect the powers of the European Parliament within the comitology procedure established by the amended Article 151.
Člen 89, odstavek 1, točka (a)
Article 89, paragraph 1, point (a)
(a) kategorija izpostavljenosti iz točke (a) člena 86(1), kjer je število bistvenih nasprotnih strank omejeno in bi uporaba bonitetnega sistema za te stranke pomenila za kreditno institucijo pretirano obremenitev;
(a) the exposure class referred to in point (a) of Article 86(1), where the number of material counterparties is limited and it would be unduly burdensome for the credit institution to implement a rating system for these counterparties;
(a) kategorija izpostavljenosti iz točke (a) člena 86(1), kjer je število bistvenih nasprotnih strank omejeno ali bi uporaba bonitetnega sistema za te stranke pomenila za kreditno institucijo pretirano obremenitev;
(a) the exposure class referred to in point (a) of Article 86(1), where the number of material counterparties is limited or it would be unduly burdensome for the credit institution to implement a rating system for these counterparties;
Glede na težave z razvojem natančno usklajenih bonitetnih modelov kategorije izpostavljenosti, navedene v členu 86(1)(a), celo pri večjem številu nasprotnih strank, morajo imeti zlasti manjše kreditne institucije možnost delne uporabe standardiziranega pristopa, če je dan eden od pogojev za njegovo uporabo.
In view of the difficulty with developing fine-tuned ratings models even where there is a substantial number of counterparties in the exposure class referred to in Article 86(1)(a) (central governments and central banks), it should be possible for smaller credit institutions, in particular, to apply the Standardised Approach on a partial basis if either of the two conditions for such application exists.
Člen 145, odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 145, paragraph 3 a (new)
Kreditne institucije obveščajo mala in srednje velika podjetja, ki zaprosijo za financiranje ključnih prvin svojega bonitetnega postopka.
Credit institutions shall inform small and medium-sized enterprises which request financing of the key elements of their rating process.
Če se nacionalne zveze kreditnih institucij ter malih in srednje velikih podjetij do 31. decembra 2006 ne dogovorijo za nacionalni kodeks prostovoljnega obveščanja, uporabijo pristojni organi ustrezna pravila, da zagotovijo razpoložljivost ustreznih informacij.
If national associations of credit institutions and of small and medium-sized enterprises do not agree by 31 December 2006 on a national voluntary information code, the competent authorities shall apply appropriate rules to ensure that the relevant information is provided.
Preglednost bonitetnega postopka je za MSP pomembna.
The transparency of the rating process is an important issue for SME.
Banke morajo tiste, ki zaprosijo za financiranje, obvestiti o najpomembnejših značilnostih bonitetnega postopka.
Banks should make public the most important features of their rating process to those applying for funding.
To je najlažje doseči na nacionalni ravni.
This can best be done at national level.
Komisiji pomaga Evropski odbor za bančništvo, ustanovljen s Sklepom Komisije 2004/10/ES (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Odbor“).
The Commission shall be assisted by the European Banking Committee instituted by Commission Decision 2004/10/EC (hereinafter referred to as "the Committee").
Pri sklicevanju na ta člen se uporabi postopek „komitologije“ iz člena 5 Sklepa 1999/468/ES, v skladu s členom 7(3) in členom 8 Sklepa.
Where reference is made to this Article, the "comitology" procedure laid down in Article 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply , in compliance with Article 7 (3) and Article 8 thereof.
Pri sklicevanju na ta člen se uporabljata člena 5 in 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES, ob upoštevanju določb člena 8 Sklepa.
Where reference is made to this Article, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply , having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
Obdobje iz člena 5(6) Sklepa 1999/468/ES traja tri mesece.
The period provided for in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be three months.
Brez poseganja v že sprejete izvedbene ukrepe se po preteku obdobja štirih let po začetku veljavnosti te direktive opusti uporaba določb, za katere je treba sprejeti tehnična pravila, predloge sprememb in sklepe v skladu z odstavkom 2.
Without prejudice to the implementing measures already adopted, upon expiry of a four-year period following the entry into force of this Directive, the application of its provisions requiring the adoption of technical rules, amendments and decisions in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be suspended.
Evropski parlament in Svet lahko na predlog Komisije obnovita zadevne določbe v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe, in jih v ta namen proučita pred pretekom zgoraj omenjenega obdobja.
Acting on a proposal from the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council may renew the provisions concerned in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty and, to that end, they shall review them prior to the expiry of the period referred to above.
Ohraniti je treba demokratično nadzorovanje bistvenih sprememb zakonodajnega akta.
Democratic control over significant changes to the legislative act must be maintained.
Klavzula o časovni omejenosti varuje pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta, če bodo ustrezne določbe začele veljati s Pogodbo o Ustavi za Evropo.
The sunset clause protects the powers of the European Parliament in case the relevant provisions enter into force with the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe.
Člen 154, odstavek 4
Article 154, paragraph 4
Do 31. decembra 2011 lahko pristojni organi vsake države članice za izpostavljenosti do podjetij določijo število dni zapadlosti, ki ga upoštevajo vse kreditne institucije v njeni pristojnosti na podlagi opredelitve neplačila iz odstavka 44 v delu 4 Priloge VII za izpostavljenosti do nasprotnih strank s sedežem v tej državi članici.
Until 31 December 2011, for corporate exposures the competent authorities of each Member State may set the number of days past due that all credit institutions in its jurisdiction shall abide by under the definition of default set out in Annex VII, Part 4, paragraph 44 for exposures to such counterparts situated within this Member State.
Če je primerno glede na lokalne razmere, to število znaša med 90 in 180 dni.
The specific number shall fall within 90- up to a figure of 180 days if local conditions make it appropriate.
Za izpostavljenosti do nasprotnih strank, s sedežem na ozemljih drugih držav članic, pristojni organi določijo število dni zamude, ki ni višje od števila, ki so ga določili pristojni organi zadevne države članice.
For exposures to such counterparts situated in the territories of other Member States, the competent authorities shall set a number of days past due which is not higher than the number set by the competent authority of the respective Member State .
Predlog spremembe, ki izhaja iz črtanega sklicevanja na člen 154(4) v odstavku 44 dela 4 Priloge VII.
Drafting adjustment resulting from the deletion of the reference to Article 154(4) in Annex VII, Part 4, paragraph 44.
Člen 154, odstavek 4 a (novo)
Article 154, paragraph 4 a (new)
Za namene odstavka 58 dela 1 Priloge VI lahko pristojni organi posamezne države članice do 31. decembra 2011 obdobje, po preteku katerega se zahteve iz odstavkov 13 do 18 in 39 do 41 dela 1 Priloge VI obravnavajo kot nične, podaljšajo za največ 180 dni, če to dovoljujejo nacionalni pogoji.
For the purposes of Annex VI, Part 1, paragraph 58, the competent authorities of each Member State may, until 31 December 2011, extend to a maximum of 180 days the period beyond which an activity will be considered void for the exposures indicated in Annex VI, part 1, paragraphs 13 to 18 and 39 to 41, where national conditions so permit.
Ta obdobja se lahko razlikujejo glede na vrsto izdelka.
This period may vary in accordance with product lines.
Pristojni organi, ki ne izkoristijo možnosti iz prvega pododstavka glede izpostavljenosti do strank, nastanjenih na njihovem ozemlju, lahko uvedejo daljši rok za dejavnosti v zvezi z nasprotnimi strankami, nastanjenimi na ozemlju držav članic, katerih pristojni organi so to možnost izrabili.
Competent authorities which do not make use of the option referred to in the first subparagraph, for exposures to counterparties located within their territory, may introduce a longer deadline for activities relating to counterparties situated in the territory of Member States whose competent authorities have exercised this option.
Dejanski rok mora biti med 90 dni in številom dni, ki jih določijo drugi pristojni organi za izpostavljenost do nasprotnih strank, nastanjenih na njihovem ozemlju.
The actual deadline must be between 90 days and the number of days fixed by the other competent authorities for exposures to counterparts situated within their respective territories.
Določbe, ki so vključene v ta predlog spremembe, so bile med nedavnimi pogajanji v Baslu očitno spregledane in so povzročile občutno neravnovesje med pristopom IRB in standardiziranim pristopom.
The provisions included in this amendment were clearly overlooked during the recent negotiations in Basel, creating a clear imbalance between the IRB and the standard approach.
Če besedilo ne bo popravljeno, je to zlahka mogoče razumeti kot neravnovesje celotne nove zakonodajne strukture na škodo malih bank, ki so sprejele standardizirani pristop.
Failure to correct the text could easily be interpreted as an imbalance in the entire new regulatory structure to the detriment of small banks which adopt the standard approach.