natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na drugih področjih pa je nadaljnje posebno poročilo odkrilo nenehne pomanjkljivosti.
In other areas, however, the follow-up of the special report revealed continuing shortcomings.
Sodišče ugovarja, da mora Komisija:
The Court argues that the Commission needs to:
· poenostaviti programski načrt in upravljavsko strukturo prihodnjih mladinskih programov in programa „Socrates“,
· simplify programme design and management structure in future 'Socrates' or 'Youth' programmes;
· razviti ustrezne in izmerljive kazalnike,
· develop relevant and measurable indicators;
· poenostaviti upravne postopke, npr. uporabo elektronskega sistema ali predložitev in obravnavo predlogov s strani nacionalnih agencij,
· simplify administrative procedures e.g. use an electronic system for the submission and processing of proposals by National Agencies;
· dajati nacionalnim agencijam boljša navodila pri revizijskem delu, ki je nujno za predložitev revizijskih potrdil, in strategijo za preverjanje, da ta potrdila ustrezajo najmanjšim standardom,
· give National Agencies better guidance on the audit work necessary for the audit certificates they are required to submit, and a strategy to check that these certificates meet the minimum standards set;
· zagotoviti ocenjevanje pomembnih upravnih vprašanj, zlasti poskusov poenostavitve upravnih in finančnih vidikov, ter sporočiti rezultate teh ocenjevanj Parlamentu, Svetu in nacionalnim agencijam, tako da ugotovitve lahko upoštevajo pri snovanju naslednjih programov.
· provide for evaluations on relevant administrative issues, in particular on attempts to simplify administrative and financial aspects of the programmes, and to communicate the results of these evaluations to the Parliament, Council and National Agencies so that their findings may be taken into account when successor programmes are being designed.
Odgovori Komisije na pripombe Sodišča so na straneh 267-268 poročila Sodišča.
The Commission's replies to the comments of the Court are provided on pages 267-268 of the Court's report.
Ključne točke:
The key points are:
· arhitektura, predlagana za naslednjo generacijo programov (2007–2013), je enostavnejša od sedanje generacije, ki je enostavnejša od programov iz let 1995–1999,
· the architecture proposed for the next generation of programmes (2007-2013) is simpler than that of the current generation, which in its turn is simpler than that of the programmes which ran from 1995-1999;
· nadaljuje z razvojem izmerljivih kazalnikov,
· it is continuing to develop measurable indicators;
· nadaljevala bo s poenostavljanjem upravljanja z dejavnostmi (npr. pogostejša dodelitev pavšalne pomoči),
· it will continue to simplify the management of actions (e.g. greater use of flat-rate grants);
· zagotovila je boljša navodila nacionalnim agencijam v zvezi z revizijskimi potrdili in okrepila njihovo revidiranje (npr. že na začetku ni sprejela večine revizijskih poročil, zagotovljenih glede na poročilo iz leta 2003),
· it has already provided better guidance on audit certification to the National Agencies and stepped-up its auditing of them (e.g. it did not initially accept most of the audit certificates provided in respect of 2003);
· okrepila je prizadevanje za ocenjevanje programov in bo zagotovila končno ocenjevanje učinkovitosti (izvajanje in rezultati) in zmogljivosti (upravni in finančni vidiki).
· it has stepped-up efforts with regard to programme evaluation and will provide final evaluations assessing effectiveness (implementation and results) and efficiency (administrative and financial aspects).
Pripravljavka osnutka splošno meni, da je podala Komisija prepričljive odgovore na točke Sodišča.
By and large, the draftswoman believes that the Commission has given convincing answers to the points made by the Court.
Meni, da bi Parlament moral:
She believes that the Parliament should :
· pozdraviti dejstvo, da je Komisija, kot kažejo njegovi predlogi za naslednjo generacijo mladinskih programov in programov vseživljenjskega učenja, pridobila izkušnje iz pomanjkljivosti programskega načrtovanja in poslovanja, ki so uničile prvo generacijo programa Socrates in mladinskih programov,
· welcome the fact that, as evidenced by its proposals for the next generation of Lifelong Learning and Youth programmes, the Commission has learned from the programme design and management weaknesses which marred the first generation of Socrates and Youth programmes;
· upoštevati, da se Komisija sooča s težavno nalogo, ko skuša uskladiti zahteve za to, da bi bili programi kar se da prijazni uporabnikom in nebirokratski, z zahtevami pravil za izvajanje finančne uredbe, da bi zagotovili dobro upravljanje z javnimi sredstvi,
· note that the Commission faces a difficult task in trying to reconcile demands that the programmes be as user-friendly and un-bureaucratic as possible with the requirements imposed on it by the implementing rules of the Financial Regulation for the sound management of public money;
· poudariti svoje prepričanje, da bi morala biti sorazmernost vodilno načelo upravljanja s štipendijami, in predlagati: pogostejšo dodelitev pavšalne pomoči; večjo podporo sofinanciranja s prispevki v blagu in manj zahtevne računovodske obveznosti upravičencev v takšnih primerih; enostavnejšo dokumentacijo finančnih in operacijskih zmogljivosti upravičencev,
· underline its conviction that the guiding principle of grant administration should be proportionality and call for: greater use of flat-rate grants; greater acknowledgement of co-financing through contributions in kind and less onerous accounting obligations on beneficiaries in such cases; simpler documentation on the financial and operational capacity of beneficiaries;
· poudariti pomembnost pravočasne objave vmesnih in naknadnih ocenjevalnih poročil.
· emphasise the importance it attaches to punctual publication of interim and ex post evaluation reports.
o razrešnici o izvajanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za finančno leto 2003
on the discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003
Odbor za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. upošteva pripombe Računskega sodišča v letnem poročilu za leto 2003 glede notranjega okoljskega nadzora Komisije, ki temeljijo na analizi štirih od štirinajstih Generalnih direktoratov, ki izvajajo notranjo politiko, vključno s takrat tako imenovanim Generalnegim direktoratom za pravosodje in notranje zadeve; poziva Generalni direktorat za pravice, svobodo in varnost, naj upošteva priporočila Računskega sodišča;
Takes note of the remarks made by the Court of Auditors in its annual report 2003 concerning the Commission's internal control environment, which are based on an analysis of four of the 14 Directorate-Generals implementing internal policies, including the Directorate-General for Justice and Home Affairs, as it was then called; calls on the Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security to follow the recommendations made by the Court of Auditors;
Izraža zaskrbljenost, ker Komisija še ni podala svojega mnenja o osnutku Finančne uredbe Eurojusta, kot zahteva sklep Eurojusta, čeprav ga je ta Komisiji poslal novembra 2003.
Expresses its concern that the Commission has not yet given its opinion on the draft financial regulation of Eurojust, as required by the Eurojust decision, although it was sent to the Commission by Eurojust in November 2003.
Razrešnica o izvajanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za finančno leto 2003: Oddelek III - Komisija
Discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003: Section III - Commission
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVICE ŽENSK IN POLITIKO ENAKIH MOŽNOSTI
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY
Odbor za pravice žensk in politiko enakih možnosti poziva Odbor za proračun, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ob upoštevanju bližnjega pristopa novih držav članic k EU je Komisija v sklepu o letnem strateškem načrtu z dne 27. februarja 2002 v okviru priprave proračuna 2003 kot osrednjo nalogo opredelila razširjeno Evropo, kot s tem povezane naloge pa varnost, stabilnost, trajnostno gospodarstvo in solidarnost,
A. whereas, with a view to the accession of the new Member States to the EU, the Commission, in its decision of 27 February 2002 regarding the Annual Policy Strategy, decided that the enlarged Europe should be a top priority in the drawing up of the 2003 budget, with security, stability and a sustainable and inclusive economy as closely associated priorities,
2. opozarja, da je v skladu s členom 3(2) Pogodbe ES spodbujanje enakosti med moškimi in ženskami temeljno načelo EU in horizontalni cilj vseh ukrepov in politik Skupnosti; ponovno poudarja svojo željo, da se enakost spolov ustrezno upošteva kot stalni prednostni cilj pri proračunskem načrtovanju, skladno z načelom upoštevanja perspektive enakosti spolov pri pripravi proračuna ("gender budgeting");
Points out that, by virtue of Article 3(2) of the EC Treaty, the promotion of equality between men and women is a fundamental principle of the EU, and is also an objective relevant across the full range of all Community activities and policies; reiterates its demand for gender equality to be taken into due consideration as an ongoing priority objective during budgetary planning, in accordance with the principle of gender budgeting;
Razrešnica glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003
Discharge in respect of implementation of the EU general budget for financial year 2003, Section III - Commission
Razrešnica glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003
Discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003 - Section III - Commission
členi 274, 275 in 276 ES ter 179a in 180b Euratom
Articles 274, 275, 276 EC and 179a, 180b Euratom
člen 70 ter Priloga V
Rule 70 and Annex V
Datum predložitve letnih zaključnih računov
Definitive annual accounts forwarded on
Letno poročilo Računskega sodišča Date de la transmission
Annual report of the Court of Auditors forwarded on
Priporočilo Sveta Date de la transmission
Council recommendation Date forwarded
Pristojni odbor Date de la saisine
Committee responsible Date of referral
Odbor(-i), zaprošeni za mnenje Date de la saisine
Committees asked for opinions Date of referral
Izid glasovanja
Result of final vote:
Predlog sklepa Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu razrešnice glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003 Oddelek III - Komisija
Proposal for a European Parliament Decision on the discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003, Section III - Commission
Predlog sklepa Evropskega parlamenta o zaključnem računu glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003, Oddelek III - Komisija
Proposal for a European Parliament Decision closing the accounts in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003, Section III - Commission
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta s pripombami, ki so sestavni del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003, Oddelek III - Komisija
Proposal for a European Parliament Resolution containing the comments which are an integral part of the decision on the discharge for implementing the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003, Section III - Commission
Poslanci, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Members present for final vote
Inés Ayala Sender, Herbert Bösch, Simon Busuttil, Paulo Casaca, Lorenzo Cesa, Petr Duchoň, James Elles, Szabolcs Fazakas, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Dan Jørgensen, Nils Lundgren, Edith Mastenbroek, Véronique Mathieu, Borut Pahor, István Pálfi, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Bart Staes, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Alexander Stubb, Jeffrey Titford, Paul van Buitenen, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Terence Wynn
Inés Ayala Sender, Herbert Bösch, Simon Busuttil, Paulo Casaca, Lorenzo Cesa, Petr Duchoň, James Elles, Szabolcs Fazakas, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Dan Jørgensen, Nils Lundgren, Edith Mastenbroek, Véronique Mathieu, Borut Pahor, István Pálfi, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Bart Staes, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Alexander Stubb, Jeffrey Titford, Paul van Buitenen, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Terence Wynn
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitutes present for final vote
Datum predložitve- A6
Date tabled - A6
Predmet tega poročila je poročilo Komisije o nadaljnjem izvajanju razrešnice za leto 2002 ( KOM(2004)0648 - C6-0126/2004 )
The Commission's report on the follow-up to the 2002 discharge ( COM(2004)0648 - C6-0126/2004 ) has been dealt with in this report
o proračunu za leto 2006: poročilo Komisije o letnem strateškem načrtovanju (LSN)
on the 2006 budget: the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy report (APS)
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ............................................................................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Development .......................................................10
MNENJE OdborA za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................15
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................15
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................17
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ....17
MNENJE Odbora za ribištvo .........................................................................................22
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................22
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 25
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 25
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu – letno strateško načrtovanje za leto 2006 ( COM(2005)0073 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - Annual Policy Strategy for 2006 ( COM(2005)0073 ),
1 UL L 172, 18.6.1999, str 1.
1 OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p.
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2003/429/ES (UL L 147, 14.6.2003, str.
1, Agreement as amended by Decision 2003/429/EC (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 112(1) svojega Poslovnika,
- having regard to Rule 112(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenj drugih odborov, zaprošenih za mnenje ( A6–0071/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the other committees asked for an opinion( A6-0071/2005 ),
A. ker bo proračun za leto 2006 zadnji iz trenutnega finančnega načrta in sestavlja, skupaj s tekočimi pogajanji za nov finančni načrt za 2007/2013, strateški okvir, v katerem bo Parlament določil svoje prednostne naloge, tako da se lahko cilji Unije podprejo z ustrezno ravnijo proračunskih virov,
A. whereas the 2006 budget will be the last of the current financial perspective and constitutes, with the ongoing negotiations for a new financial perspective for 2007/2013, the strategic framework in which the Parliament will decide its priorities so that the Union's objectives can be backed up by a proper level of budgetary resources;
B. ker bo proračun za leto 2006 drugi v razširjeni Uniji in je treba zagotoviti ustrezna sredstva za izvajanje evropske politike na skladen način po celotni Uniji in tudi podpreti prizadevanja trenutnih držav kandidatk,
B. whereas the 2006 budget will be the second one of the enlarged Union and it is necessary to ensure proper means to implement the European policies in a harmonious fashion across the whole Union, as well as to support the efforts of the current candidate countries;
C. ker je Evropska unija na ključnem razpotju pri svojem razvoju s postopkom sprejetja ustave, odločanjem o širitvi, okrepitvijo svoje vloge na mednarodni ravni, uvedbo novih ukrepov za oživitev lizbonske strategije znotraj novega okvira za rast in zaposlovanje, konkurenčnost in trajnostni razvoj, okrepitvijo notranjega trga in polno vključitvijo evropskih državljanov; poudarja, da je treba te izzive podpreti s skladnimi, dobro usklajenimi in primerno financiranimi dejanji,
C. whereas the European Union is at a crucial juncture in its development with the processes of adopting constitution, deciding on enlargement, reinforcing its role on the international stage, launching new measures to reinvigorate the Lisbon Agenda within a new framework for growth and employment, competitiveness and sustainable development, strengthening the internal market and full integration of European citizens; underlining that these challenges must be underpinned by coherent, well coordinated and adequately financed actions,
D. ker bi prepad med temi ambicijami in sredstvi, ki so na voljo za njihov doseg, sedaj lahko sprožil proces nazadovanja in ogrozil že doseženi napredek; poudarja vlogo proračuna za leto 2006 pri zagotavljanju kontinuitete dejanj in pri služenju kot premostitvenem sredstvu za večletno načrtovanje po letu 2006, da bi zagotovili, da lahko Unija financira svoje politične ambicije,
D. whereas a gap between these ambitions and the means made available to achieve them would now risk triggering a process of regression and jeopardise the progress already made; stressing the role of the 2006 budget in guaranteeing the continuity of actions and in serving as the bridging instrument for the multiannual programming after 2006, to ensure that the Union can finance its political ambitions;
E. ker podpira najbolj nujno prednostno nalogo Komisije: ponovno vzpostaviti dinamično in trajnostno rast v Evropi ter zagotoviti več in boljša delovna mesta za državljane; je pripravljen financirati ustrezne programe za uresničitev tega cilja,
E. whereas it supports the Commission's most urgent priority, restoring a dynamic and sustainable growth in Europe and providing for more and better jobs to citizens; it is ready to finance appropriate programs to achieve this aim;
Finančni okvir
Financial framework
2. poudarja, da morajo biti proračunske vsote za obveznosti osnovane na dogovorjenih ciljih in da morajo biti plačila ustrezno določena; je odločen, da bo za ključno prednostno nalogo proračunskega postopka za leto 2006 postavil vprašanje primerne ravni plačil, tudi z vidika prihodnjih pogajanj o novem finančnem načrtu;
Stresses that the budgeted amounts for commitments have to be based on agreed objectives and that the payments should be fixed accordingly; resolves to make the matter of an adequate level of payments a fundamental priority for the 2006 budget procedure, also in view of forthcoming negotiations on a new financial perspective;
5. se popolnoma zaveda možnih učinkov pogajanj o novem finančnem načrtu po letu 2006 o proračunskem postopku 2006; potrjuje, da bo uporabil svoja proračunska pooblastila, da bi zagotovil sredstva, potrebna za izpolnjevanje odgovornosti Unije;
Is fully aware of the possible effects of the negotiations on a new financial perspective post-2006 on the 2006 budgetary procedure; states that it will use its budgetary powers to ensure that the 2006 budget will provide the appropriations needed to meet the responsibilities of the Union;
Proračunska strategija in sektorske prednosti
Budgetary Strategy and Sectoral Priorities
da bi zagotovili spoštovanje dobrega finančnega in proračunskega upravljanja z:
in order to ensure sound financial and budgetary management through:
· ustanovitvijo ustrezne ravni plačil za kritje resničnih potreb;
· Establishing an adequate level of payments to cover the real needs;
· revizijo finančnega načrta pri prerazporejanju proračunskih sredstev iz podnaslova 1a) na podnaslov 1b), za izvedbo določb Uredbe 1782/2003;
· The revision of the financial perspective transferring appropriations from subheading 1a) to subheading 1b), in order to implement the provisions of regulation 1782/2003;
· pravilnim izvajanjem skupne izjave julija 2004 o finančnem načrtovanju;
· Properly implementing the joint statement of July 2004 on financial programming;
· uporabo vseh sredstev, ki so na voljo v Pogodbi in/ali trenutnem Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o proračunski disciplini, za soočenje s pomembnimi proračunskimi in finančnimi izzivi, s katerimi se bo EU soočila pri proračunu za leto 2006, ter za zagotovitev trdne podlage za prihodnja proračunska leta;
· Using all means available in the Treaty and/or the current Interinstitutional Agreement on Budgetary Discipline to face the significant budgetary and financial challenges which the EU will face with the 2006 budget and to provide a solid basis for the budgetary years to come;
8. podpira Komisijo pri njenem splošnem pristopu v zvezi s pospeševanjem blaginje, solidarnosti in varnosti v Uniji, da bi postala Evropa bolj konkurenčna in bolj kohezivna, bližja državljanom ter da bi imela močnejšo vlogo v svetu; kljub temu poudarja, da zadnje finančno načrtovanje in LSN predstavljata številne vrzeli med ključnimi ukrepi za leto 2006 ter proračunskimi sredstvi (pobuda i2020, pobuda „znanje za rast“, pobuda v korist mladine, podpora za Evropsko agencijo za azil, programi za prispevek k izvajanju okoljske zakonodaje, evropsko leto mobilnosti delavcev itd.);
Supports the Commission in its general approach to foster prosperity and solidarity, security within the Union, to make Europe more competitive and cohesive, closer to its citizens and stronger in the world; nevertheless points out that its latest financial programming and its APS show a number of discrepancies between key action for 2006 and budgetary resources (i2020 initiative, Growth initiative, Youth initiative, European asylum support, programmes to help implement environmental legislation, European Year of Mobility for Workers, etc.);
– osredotočanjem in krepitvijo podpore EU za ključne cilje Lizbone in Göteborga, kot so zaposlovanje, okoljska politika, raziskave in razvoj, MSP, spodbujanje družbe, temelječe na znanju, in informacijske družbe, širjenje okoljskih tehnologij, vseživljenjsko učenje in pravilno izvajanje vseevropskih omrežij;
- concentrating and reinforcing the EU support for key Lisbon and Göteborg areas, such as employment, environmental policy, research and development, SMEs, promoting the knowledge- and information society, dissemination of environmental technologies, life-long learning, and properly implementing the Trans European Networks;
– omogočanjem potrebnih večjih prizadevanj za dokončno oblikovanje notranjega trga;
- allowing for stronger efforts needed to complete the internal market;
– pripravo novih področij podpore Skupnosti, kot je Natura 2000;
- preparing for new areas of Community support, such as Natura 2000;
vključno z novimi predlogi v zvezi s programi izmenjave;
The reinforcement of the EU's role in the international community; (
11. je zaskrbljen zaradi razvoja ptičje gripe v Jugovzhodni Aziji; poziva Komisijo, da tesno sodeluje s FAO, Svetovno zdravstveno organizacijo, Mednarodnim uradom za živalske kužne bolezni (OIE), z državami in regijami ter da poveča sredstva za raziskave o tej potencialno resni grožnji za kmetijstvo ter zdravje živali in tudi ljudi v EU;
Is concerned at reports about the development of avian influenza in Southeast Asia; urges the Commission to cooperate closely with the FAO, the WHO, the OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health) and with the countries in the region and to increase funding for research conducted into this potentially grave threat to agriculture and to animal as well as human health in the EU;
Strukturni ukrepi
Structural operations