natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Konsolidirano besedilo je preoblikovano v enoten pravni akt, skladno in razumljivo novo besedilo, ki formalno nadomesti izvorni akt in vse nadaljnje spremembe.
The consolidated text is thus reworked into a single legal act, a coherent and comprehensible new text that formally replaces the initial act and all subsequent amendments thereto.
Delovanje kodifikacije v praksi omogoča posvetovalna skupina pravnih služb treh institucij, ki ima nalogo pretresti predloge Komisije ter zagotoviti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, da predlogi pomenijo resnično kodifikacijo in da Komisija v besedila ni uvedla bistvenih sprememb.
At the practical level, codification operates with the aid of the Consultative Working Party staffed by the three institutions’ Legal Services, which has the task of screening the Commission proposals and guaranteeing to Parliament and the Council that they amount to codification in the true sense and that the Commission has not fundamentally altered the texts.
Preoblikovanje je postopek, pri katerem nov pravno zavezujoč akt, ki razveljavi akte, ki jih nadomesti, združi po eni strani spremembe politične vsebine zakonodaje in po drugi kodifikacijo tistega dela, ki ni spremenjen.
Recasting is a process whereby a legally binding new act, repealing the acts that it replaces, on the one hand amends the substantive policy element of the legislation and secondly codifies the other provisions intended to remain unchanged.
Preoblikovanje omogoča posodobitev pravnih aktov ob bistveni spremembi vsebine, hkrati pa dovoljuje kodifikacijo besedil predpisov, ki so včasih razpršeni in zato olajša razumevanje in poenostavitev zakonodaje.
Not only does the recasting technique enable legislative acts to be updated by amending them as regards their substance, but it can also be used to codify at times sprawling legislative texts: it thus helps to simplify legislation and makes it easier to understand.
Preoblikovanje ureja Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 28. novembra 2001
Recasting is governed by the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001
UL C 77/1, 28.3.2002, str.
OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
Sprememba zakonodajnega pristopa deluje v dveh smereh.
Changing the regulatory approach works in two directions.
Po eni strani dopušča večjo odprtost za alternativne načine urejanja, na primer za koregulacijo in samoregulacijo.
In the first place, it affords wider scope for alternative regulation methods such as co-regulation and self-regulation.
Koregulacija je po določbah Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma„ Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje“ (točka 18) mehanizem, s katerim zakonodajni akt Skupnosti daje pooblastilo pristojnim v določenem sektorju (gospodarskim subjektom, socialnim partnerjem, nevladnim organizacijam, združenjem itd.), da dosežejo cilje, ki jih je opredelil zakonodajni organ.
Co-regulation , as defined in the IIA on better law-making (point 18), is the ‘mechanism whereby a Community legislative act entrusts the attainment of the objectives defined by the legislative authority to parties which are recognised in the field (such as economic operators, the social partners, non-governmental organisations, or associations)’.
Samoregulacija označuje možnost, ki jo imajo gospodarski subjekti, socialni partnerji nevladne organizacije in združenja, da med sabo in zase sprejmejo skupne smernice na evropski ravni (zlasti kodeks ravnanja ali sektorske sporazume) (točka 22 uvodne izjave navedenega Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma)
Self-regulation , by contrast, denotes ‘the possibility for economic operators, the social partners, non-governmental organisations or associations to adopt amongst themselves and for themselves common guidelines at European level (particularly codes of practice or sectoral agreements)’ (point 22 of the above-mentioned IIA).
Po drugi strani sprememba zakonodajnega pristopa zadeva izbiro primernega zakonodajnega instrumenta z nadomestitvijo direktiv z uredbami .
Secondly, the change of regulatory approach applies to the choice of the right legislative instrument in that directives are to be replaced by regulations .
Kot je znano, je mogoče uredbe takoj uporabiti brez popačenj, ki jih povzroča prenos, brez neskladnosti, ki jih povzroča izbira izvedbenih predpisov in brez povečevanja nacionalne zakonodaje.
It is common knowledge that a regulation is directly applicable, without the distortions caused by transposition, without the discrepancies arising from the choice of implementing measure, and without need to add to the body of national legislation.
Uredbe so torej ključni instrument poenostavitve.
That being the case, regulations have an essential role to play in simplification.
Direktivo bi bilo treba predlagati le v primeru, ko načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti narekujeta, naj se pusti več prostora diskrecijski pravici držav članic.
Directives should be proposed only when the subsidiarity and proportionality principles suggest that the Member States should be allowed wider-ranging discretion.
Večja uporaba informacijske tehnologije omogoča učinkovitejše izkoriščanje njenega precejšnjega potenciala.
If greater use is made of information technology , its potential can be tapped more effectively.
Dejansko lahko varna, integrirana e-uprava pomaga zmanjšati upravno breme s pospeševanjem postopkov, omejevanjem pretoka dokumentov, omogočanjem enotnejšega izvajanja zakonodaje in zmanjševanjem tveganja napake.
Secure integrated e-government can help to lighten unwieldy bureaucracy by speeding up procedures, stemming the flow of paper, making for more uniform enforcement of legislation, and reducing the risk of errors.
Nazadnje Komisija prosi institucije in države članice za podporo pri poenostavitvi.
The Commission concludes by asking the institutions and the Member States to support the work of simplification.
Stališče poročevalca
The rapporteur’s view
Predstavljeni osnutek poročila o poenostavitvi ima namen odgovoriti na sporočilo Komisije in po možnosti dati nekaj predlogov za učinkovitejše metode poenostavitve, ki jih je predlagala Komisija.
This draft report on simplification seeks to respond to the Commission communication and, wherever possible, put forward suggestions for improving the effectiveness of the simplification methods proposed.
Še posebej lahko vaš poročevalec zgolj odobrava tehniko razveljavitve .
In particular, your rapporteur can only approve of the repeal technique.
Samoumevno se zdi ne le podpreti, temveč tudi zahtevati, da Komisija predlaga razveljavitev pravnih aktov, ki so nepomembni ali zastareli.
It seems logical not just to give support, but indeed to demand that the Commission propose the repeal of legal acts which have become irrelevant or obsolete.
Kljub temu pa mora Komisija posvetiti pozornost dejstvu, da mora v takih primerih razveljavitev zakonodaje Skupnosti spremljati nov pravni akt Skupnosti, ki bi glede na prednostno pravico učinkoval tako, da bi onemogočil državam članicam urejanje področij, ki so bila deregulirana na ravni Skupnosti.
The Commission’s attention should, however, be drawn to the fact that in such cases it will be necessary not only to repeal the Community legislation, but also to adopt a new Community legal act, which, operating according to the theory of pre-emption, would serve to prevent the Member States from regulating matters that had been deregulated at Community level.
Komisija bo kljub temu morala sprejeti ustrezna ukrepe za dosego tega cilja .
The Commission ought, therefore, to take the steps required to that end.
Zanimiva se zdi zamisel Komisije, da bi v svoje zakonodajne predloge uvedla revizijsko klavzulo in prva ocena kaže, da bi jo Parlament lahko podprl.
The Commission’s idea of incorporating review clauses in its legislative proposals seems interesting and initial consideration suggests that Parliament could endorse it.
Vaš poročevalec zelo pozitivno ocenjuje kodifikacijo, saj so po tej metodi sestavljena besedila lažje berljiva in pravno varna in je zatorej eden najpomembnejših instrumentov poenostavitve.
Your rapporteur likewise strongly favours codification , since this method produces intelligible and legally certain texts and is consequently one of the principal simplification tools.
Od približno 2400 družin potencialno zadevnih zakonodajnih aktov je Evropski parlament doslej obravnaval samo 49 predlogov kodifikacije, povezanih v glavnem s kmetijskim sektorjem ali drugimi specifično sektorskimi politikami.
There are some 2 400 families of legislative acts which might lend themselves to this method, but, that notwithstanding, Parliament has dealt to date with only 49 codification proposals, relating mainly to the agricultural sector or other highly specialised policies.
Upati je, da bo v prihodnjih dveh letih kodifikacija vplivala na odločujoče vidike gospodarstva, kot so pravo družb, intelektualna lastnina in varstvo potrošnikov.
It is to be hoped that in the next two years codification will make itself felt in key economic areas such as company law, intellectual property, and consumer protection.
Nezanimanje Komisije za uporabo te tehnike je treba negativno oceniti.
The Commission deserves criticism for its lack of ambition in employing this technique.
Njena politična spodbuda je nujna, da dobi kodifikacija prednost na področjih, ki so ključna za poslovno konkurenčnost in interese državljanov.
It needs to take the lead politically so that the codification of matters central to industrial competitiveness and citizens’ interests can be treated as a priority.
Preoblikovanje je najbrž najpomembnejši instrument poenostavitve, ki bi ga bilo treba vsestransko spodbujati.
Recasting is probably the most significant simplification tool and its use should be comprehensively encouraged.
Zakonodajne pobude Komisije na področjih, kot so notranji trg in okolje, bi lahko bile na primer predlogi za preoblikovanje.
The Commission’s legislative initiatives relating to, for example, the internal market or the environment could take the form of recasting proposals.
Pogosto pa dvojnost tega instrumenta - kodifikacija in sprememba predhodnega akta, ki ga novi pravni akt razveljavlja - to tehniko še posebej zapleta.
Often, however, the dual nature of recasting – the earlier act is codified and amended, and then repealed by a new legal act – makes it a particularly complex technique.
To pojasnjuje, zakaj se je Komisija redko poslužuje in je pravzaprav pokazala, da daje prednost bolj tradicionalnim pobudam, kot so običajne spremembe ali dopolnitve veljavnih aktov.
This explains why the Commission rarely employs it and indeed has shown a preference for more traditional types of initiatives such as mere amendments or additions to acts in force.
Kakor je pravzaprav razvidno, je bilo samo dvanajst predlogov za preoblikovanje predloženih v skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom o preoblikovanju iz leta 2002: dva sta se zaključila z objavo, dva sta bili umaknjena in osem jih je še v obravnavi.
Only twelve recasts are known to have been submitted in accordance with the 2002 IIA on recasting: two were eventually published, two have been withdrawn, and eight are still pending.
Težko je razumeti, zakaj je glavni instrument poenostavitve tako redko uporabljen.
It is difficult to understand why the main simplification tool is used so rarely.
To je eno od področij, kjer bi Evropski parlament lahko ukrepal.
This is one of the points on which Parliament could take action.
Vaš poročevalec meni, da je bilo preoblikovanje uporabljeno le v omejenem obsegu, kar je posledica slabe usklajenosti poslovnika Parlamenta z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom, ki ga ureja.
Your rapporteur considers that recasting has been used only to a limited extent and that this is due to a failure to gear Parliament’s Rules of Procedure closely enough to the relevant Interinstitutional Agreement.
Poleg tega bi Evropski parlament lahko pozval Komisijo k strožjemu izvajanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o preoblikovanju, zlasti zaradi večjega razlikovanja med kodificiranim delom – za katerega bi logično veljal Medinstitucionalni sporazum o kodifikaciji iz leta 1994
Parliament could also call on the Commission to apply the IIA on recasting more systematically, especially with a view to differentiating more clearly between the codified part of an act, to which the 1994 IIA on codification
2. – bistvenimi spremembami in zgolj oblikovnimi ali redakcijskimi spremembami (točka 4, tretja alinea Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o preoblikovanju).
2. should obviously apply, substantive amendments, and ‘purely formal or editorial changes’ (point 4, third indent, of the IIA on recasting).
Razen kodifikacije in preoblikovanja bi bilo mogoče uvesti opredelitev tretje vrste posegov poleg razlikovanja med bistveno spremenjenimi deli in kodificiranimi deli, ki bi predvidela ustrezne možnosti za poenostavitev zakonodajnih aktov Skupnosti.
As well as distinguishing between the parts amended in terms of their substance and the codified parts, it might be possible to provide for operations in a third category, existing alongside codification and recasting, so as to afford appropriate means of simplifying Community legal acts.
Ta vrsta posegov bi lahko vsebovala na primer redakcijske in oblikovne spremembe, o katerih govori točka 4, tretja alinea prej navedenega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
This third category could include the formal or editorial changes referred to in the third indent of point 4 of the IIA mentioned in the preceding paragraph.
Te spremembe ali oblikovne prilagoditve bi pregledala posvetovalna skupina (točka 4 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o kodifikaciji), ki bi potrdila njihovo politično nevtralnost, kot že velja za postopek kodifikacije.
Formal alterations or adjustments of this kind would be examined by the Consultative Working Party (point 4 of the IIA on codification), which would ascertain that they were politically neutral, following the practice already applied to codification procedures.
Primerno bi bilo tudi pretehtati možnost uvedbe pospešenega postopka preoblikovanja v Evropskem parlamentu in Svetu, seveda pa ob tem ohraniti običajni zakonodajni postopek, na primer z uvedbo postopka pregleda pred samo enim samim odborom Parlamenta ali s sklenitvijo, da se mora pristojni odbor predhodno izreči, ali namerava uporabiti poenostavljen postopek (ki je predviden v pravilniku) za predlog preoblikovanja.
It would in addition be desirable to determine whether Parliament and the Council might introduce a fast-track procedure for recasts, without of course undermining the normal Community legislative process, but providing instead for a procedure in which, say, recasts would be considered by a single parliamentary committee or stipulating that the committee responsible would in the first place have to decide whether the simplified procedure (as provided for in the Rules of Procedure) should be applied to a recasting proposal.
Medinstitucionalni sporazum „Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje“ v točki 36 določa, da bodo morali zakonodajni organi spremeniti način dela, tako da bodo oblikovali strukture ad hoc, ki bodo pristojne za poenostavitev zakonodaje .
Point 36 of the IIA on better law-making calls on the legislative authorities to modify their working methods by setting up ad hoc machinery for legislative simplification.
Reforma Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o preoblikovanju (ali nov medinstitucionalni sporazum ali sprememba Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma „Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje“) bi lahko vsebovale te postopke ad hoc.
Revision of the IIA on recasting (or a new IIA or amendment of the IIA on better law-making) could cover such ad hoc procedures.
V vsakem primeru bi zaradi pomena preoblikovanja kot instrumenta poenostavitve Parlament moral pregledati Medinstitucionalni sporazum in preučiti vzroke, zakaj se tako redko uporablja, institucije pa bi morale prevzeti svojo odgovornost.
At all events, given that recasting is such an important simplification tool, Parliament should consider the IIA and the reasons why it is applied so rarely, and the institutions should shoulder their responsibilities.
Če se resnično želi, da bi bil ta instrument učinkovit, bi morala Evropski parlament in Svet predvsem sprejeti omejitve, ki izhajajo iz uporabe Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o kodifikaciji, in se v primeru preoblikovanja vzdržati spreminjanja kodificiranih delov (kot je mogoče sklepati iz točke 8 prej navedenega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma).
In particular, if there is a genuine desire to make recasting effective, Parliament and the Council should accept the limitations deriving from application of the IIA on codification and refrain from amending the codified provisions when an act is recast (this is the inference to be drawn from point 8 of the IIA on recasting).
To bi lahko spremljal izredni postopek za vlaganje predlogov sprememb k kodificiranemu delu, če je to nujno zaradi skladnosti z delom, ki se spreminja.
A commitment to that effect could go hand in hand with a special procedure for amending the codified part of an act, where it was necessary to do so in order to ensure consistency with the amendable part.
To pa seveda vodi v spremembo točke 8 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o preoblikovanju, ki pa v sedanji obliki to prepoveduje.
This would naturally entail amendment of point 8 of the IIA on recasting, which, as it stands, prohibits such a procedure.
Glede spremembe zakonodajnega pristopa, zlasti pa koregulacije, je Evropski parlament odprto izrazil svoje mnenje v Resoluciji z dne 9. marca 2004 o sporočilu Komisije o poenostavitvi in izboljšanju oblikovanja predpisov Skupnosti, sklicujoč se na pravico, da lahko nasprotuje začetku veljavnosti prostovoljnih sporazumov, sprejetih v postopku koregulacije.
As regards changing the regulatory approach and co-regulation , Parliament openly stated its view in the resolution of 9 March 2004 on the Commission communication on simplifying and improving the Community’s regulatory activity and affirmed its right to object to the entry into force of a voluntary agreement adopted by a co-regulation procedure.
Razumljivo je, da Komisija lahko uporabi koregulacijo in samoregulacijo le zelo previdno in vedno v pravnem okviru, ki ga določa Medinstitucionalni sporazum „Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje“, ki v vsakem primeru določa prenos osnutkov sporazumov na zakonodajne organe.
The Commission clearly needs to exercise great caution when resorting to co-regulation and self-regulation and should invariably keep within the frame of reference provided by the IIA on better law-making, which, in any case, stipulates that draft agreements must be sent to the legislative authority.
Predlog Komisije za razširitev uporabe koregulacije na pomembne sektorje gospodarskih dejavnosti (na primer na storitveni sektor) se zdi povsem utemeljen.
The Commission’s proposal to extend co-regulation to encompass key economic sectors (services, for example) seems entirely reasonable.
Bistveno je, da Komisija prične izvajati Medinstitucionalni sporazum „Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje“ in da se predvsem zavzame, da v zakonodajnem predlogu pojasni pogoje in omejitve, ki veljajo za sklepanje prostovoljnih sporazumov med zainteresiranimi stranmi.
It is essential that the Commission implement the IIA on better law-making and above all commit itself to specifying in its legislative proposals under what conditions and within what limits the parties concerned might conclude voluntary agreements.
N adomestitev direktiv z uredbami je izjemno pomembna za poenostavitev zakonodaje, saj odpravi težave s prenosom in prispeva k zmanjšanju zakonodajnih instrumentov, pod pogojem, da se uporablja previdno in brez poseganja v pristojnosti držav članic.
The replacement of directives by regulations is vitally important for the simplification of legislation, since it will eliminate transposition problems and greatly help to reduce the volume of legislative instruments, provided that the procedure is used with caution and without encroaching on the powers of the Member States.
Vaš poročevalec ne nasprotuje predlogu Komisije o boljšem izkoriščanju vseh zmogljivosti informacijske tehnologije.
Your rapporteur has no objection to the Commission’s proposal to exploit the potential of information technology to the full.
Parlament lahko podpre akcijske načrte bodoče e-uprave in spodbudi tudi zakonodajne predloge, ki uvajajo spremembe v postopke, da bi ti vključevali nove tehnologije.
Parliament can support both the forthcoming e-government action plan and the legislative proposals to open up procedures to new technologies.
Skratka, primerno je odobravati prizadevanje Komisije za nadaljnje razvijanje strategije poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja, da bi – tega nikakor ne smemo pozabiti – v interesu državljanov naredila institucije in zakonodajne instrumente učinkovitejše.
In short, the Commission should be applauded for its commitment to pursuing its strategy to simplify the legislative environment in order – and this should never be forgotten – to further the interests of citizens and make the institutions more efficient and legislative instruments more effective.
Vendar pa bi Komisija morala upoštevati omenjene pripombe in natančneje opredeliti izboljšanje metod poenostavitve v skladu z zakonodajnimi postopki, ki so določeni v pogodbah.
However, it ought to pay heed to the comments above and should try to be more precise regarding the improvements to be made to simplification methods without infringing the legislative procedures laid down in the Treaties.
Morda bi, kot je bilo že večkrat rečeno, pregled Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o preoblikovanju omogočil opazno povečanje instrumentov in rezultatov poenostavitve.
As has been mentioned several times, revision of the IIA on recasting might give a powerful fillip to simplification in terms of both the tools and the outcome.
Vaš poročevalec nazadnje meni, da je primerno pozvati Komisijo, naj ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenih smernic nemudoma predstavi predlog za preoblikovanje medinstitucionalnih sporazumov, ki urejajo kakovost zakonodaje Unije.
Finally, your rapporteur thinks it right to call on the Commission, taking into account the guidelines set out above, to submit a proposal without delay with a view to recasting the interinstitutional agreements governing the quality of Union legislation.
1. močno podpira premik k enostavnejši zakonodaji in soglaša s Komisijo, da je treba osredotočiti zakonodajo EU na tri poglavitne cilje lizbonske strategije;
Supports strongly the move towards simpler EU legislation and agrees with the Commission on the need to focus EU legislation on the three major objectives of the Lisbon strategy;
6. meni, da bo osredotočanje zakonodaje na politična načela na eni strani ter prepuščanje izvedbenih ukrepov komitologiji na drugi strani možno le, če bo sprejet nov medinstitucionalni sporazum; meni, da bo boljše sprejemanje zakonov doseženo le, če bo med institucijami EU odnos vzajemnega zaupanja, ki bo popolnoma spoštoval pravice Parlamenta;
Believes that focusing legislation on political principles on the one hand and leaving implementing measures to comitology on the other is acceptable only with a new inter-institutional agreement; is of the opinion that better law-making will be achieved only if there is mutual trust between the EU institutions, which fully respects the Parliament’s prerogatives;
Strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja
A strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
iii) povečanje splošne preglednosti zakonodajnega postopka predvsem tako, da se seje Sveta odpre za javnost, ko Svet deluje v svoji zakonodajni vlogi;
iii) strengthening of the general transparency of the regulatory process, in particular by opening Council meetings to public scrutiny when the Council is acting in its legislative capacity;