natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če bo napredek pomanjkljiv, bo potreben ukrep na ravni EU za opredelitev zahtev za zagotavljanje konkurenčnih pogojev.
Should the progress be insufficient, an action at EU level would be necessary to define requirements at EU level in order to ensure a level-playing field.
Poudariti je treba, da je zapletenost združitev in prevzemov različna.
It also needs to be stressed that the complexity of M&A varies .
Zato morajo biti zahtevane informacije sorazmerne.
Accordingly, the requested information must be proportionate .
Združitve in prevzemi v istem sektorju, ki vključujejo morebitnega pridobitelja, ki že ima dovoljenje in ga nadzira EU, so enostavnejše od medsektorskih.
A M&A occurring in the same sector and involving a potential acquirer already duly licensed and supervised in the EU is a rather simpler case compared to a cross-sector one.
Zapletenost se poveča, če je v združitve in prevzeme vpleten subjekt iz tretje države ali nereguliran subjekt.
The complexity augments if a third-country or an unregulated entity is involved.
Dodati je treba, da pridobitev kvalificiranega deleža lahko pomeni dejanski prenos nadzor nad ciljnim subjektom.
It must be added that an acquisition of qualifying shareholdings may result in a transfer of effective control of the target entity.
Vendar morajo imeti nadzorniki v upravičenih primerih možnost zahtevati manj obsežne informacije, ki so potrebne za ocenjevanje, tako da lahko tržni udeleženci učinkovito delujejo na trgu vrednostnih papirjev.
However, there should be the possibility for supervisors, in justified cases, to request less extensive information for the purpose of an assessment, so that market participants are able to operate effectively in the securities market.
To je pomembno za upravitelje ali skrbnike skladov, ki hranijo pridobljene delnice za kratek čas ali pa ne uveljavljajo glasovalnih pravic, ki iz njih izhajajo.
This is relevant for fund managers or custodians who either keep the acquired shares for a very short time or do not exercise voting rights attached to them .
Vendar se ne sme ogroziti finančne stabilnosti.
However, financial stability should not be put at risk.
Poročevalec podpira ohranjanje nespremenjenega položaja in odločujoče vloge pristojnega organa v državi članici, kjer ima ciljni subjekt svoj sedež.
Your rapporteur is in favour of maintaining the status quo and preserving the decisive role of the competent authority of the Member State where the target is situated.
Kljub temu meni, da sta zlasti v zapletenih primerih, ko je vključenih več nadzornikov, ključnega pomena tesno sodelovanje med nadzorniki in preglednost njihovih različnih stališč in razlogov.
Nevertheless, he believes that in particular in complex cases when several supervisors are involved, close cooperation between all supervisors and transparency as regards their eventually diverging views and reasons is cardinal.
Poročevalec meni, da z negativno odločitvijo nadzornik cilja pripravi primerno obrazložitev, ki omogoča razumevanje odločitve .
Your rapporteur believes that in case of a negative decision the supervisor of the target shall give an adequate explanation allowing understanding of reasons .
Takšna splošna zahteva bo skupaj s pravico do pritožbe onemogočala kakršno koli samovoljno odločitev iz preteklosti.
Such general requirement will, together with a right of appeal, prevent any arbitrary decision that occurred in the past.
Treba je poudariti, da mora morebitni pridobitelj zagotoviti vse potrebne informacije nadzorniku cilja, nadzornik pa oceniti morebitnega pridobitelja in pri tem upoštevati merila, določena v tem predlogu.
It must be stressed that the potential acquirer has the duty to provide the supervisor with all necessary information and the supervisor has the duty to assess the potential acquirer in the light of the criteria laid down in this proposal.
Poročevalec meni, da je primerno Komisiji zagotoviti dostop do dokumentov , na katerih temelji negativna odločitev nadzornikov.
Your rapporteur considers it useful to give access to the Commission to those documents on which the negative decision of supervisor of the target is based.
Komisija mora svojo zahtevo nasloviti na države članice, s čimer ohranja običajno sodelovanje.
The Commission should address its request to Member States , thereby maintaining the usual way of cooperation.
Države članice potem stopijo v stik s svojimi nadzorniki.
The Member States will then get in touch with their supervisors.
Dokumenti, ki jih ni treba predložiti, temeljijo zlasti na informacijah tajnih služb in sodijo v člen 296 pogodbe.
Documents which might be excluded from delivery are in particular those based on secret services information and falling under Art. 296 of the Treaty.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 92/49/EGS in direktiv 2002/83/ES, 2004/39/ES, 2005/68/ES in 2006/48/ES glede postopkovnih pravil in ocenjevalnih meril za oceno varnega in skrbnega poslovanja pri pridobitvah in zvišanju imetništva delnic v finančnem sektorju
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of shareholdings in the financial sector
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Rusko federacijo o ponovnem sprejemu
on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on readmission
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................12
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................12
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2006)0191 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0191 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 63(3)(b) in prvega stavka prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 63(3)(b) and 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0168/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0168/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0028/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0028/2007 ),
Sporazum: zgodovina in razlogi
The agreement: history and reasons
1.1 Zgodovina
1.1 History
Sporazum o ponovnem sprejemu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Rusko federacijo je že peti tovrstni sporazum, dogovorjen in sklenjen med Skupnostjo in državo nečlanico.
The readmission agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation is the fifth of its kind to have been negotiated and concluded by the Community with a non-member country.
Sklenitev sporazuma o ponovnem sprejemu z Rusijo je bila vključena že med ukrepe, predlagane v skupni strategiji EU, ki je bila sprejeta 4. junija 1999.
Conclusion of a readmission agreement with Russia was already included among the measures proposed in the EU joint strategy adopted on 4 June 1999.
Prvi krog pogajanj je bil v Moskvi 23. januarja 2003.
The first round of negotiations was held in Moscow on 23 January 2003.
Od oktobra 2004 so pogajanja potekala vzporedno s pogajanji o sporazumu med EU in Rusijo o poenostavitvi vizumskega postopka.
From October 2004, the negotiations proceeded in parallel with the negotiations on the EU-Russia visa facilitation agreement.
Sporazuma sta bila formalno parafirana v Moskvi 4. aprila 2006.
The two agreements were formally initialled in Moscow on 4 April 2006.
Ker sta sporazuma o poenostavitvi vizumskega postopka in ponovnem sprejemu povezana, bi ju bilo treba podpisati in skleniti hkrati, prav tako pa bi morala začeti veljati hkrati.
Because the visa facilitation agreement and the readmission agreement are linked, they should both be signed and concluded and enter into force at the same time.
V ozadju sporazumov je vzajemna politična izmenjava.
The thinking behind the agreements is reciprocal political compensation.
Končno besedilo sporazuma z Rusijo o ponovnem sprejemu bi lahko povzeli takole: obveznosti ponovnega sprejema iz sporazuma (členi od 2 do 5) temeljijo na načelu vzajemnosti in zajemajo državljane pogodbenic (člena 2 in 4) ter državljane tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva (člena 3 in 5).
The final substance of the readmission agreement with Russia can be summarised as follows: the readmission obligations set out in the agreement (Articles 2 to 5) are based on a reciprocity rule and cover nationals of the contracting parties (Articles 2 and 4), along with third-country nationals and stateless persons (Articles 3 and 5).
Sporazum vsebuje tudi določbe o pogojih ponovnega sprejema (člena 3 in 5); tranzitu (člena 14 in 15, v povezavi s prilogo 6); tehničnih vidikih postopka ponovnega sprejema (členi 6 do 13, v povezavi s prilogami 1 do 5); pravilih o stroških, varstvu osebnih podatkov in razmerju do drugih mednarodnih obveznosti (členi 16 do 18); ter o članstvu, nalogah in pooblastilih skupnega odbora za ponovni sprejem (člen 19).
The agreement also contains provisions relating to conditions for readmission (Articles 3 and 5); transit operations (Articles 14 and 15, in conjunction with Annex 6); technical aspects of the readmission procedure (Articles 6 to 13, in conjunction with Annexes 1 to 5); rules on costs, data protection, and the relationship to other international obligations (Articles 16 to 18); and the membership, tasks, and powers of the Joint Readmission Committee (Article 19).
Da bi se sporazum uveljavil tudi v praksi, se v členu 20 od Rusije zahteva sklenitev dvostranskih protokolov o izvajanju z vsemi državami članicami.
To enable the agreement to be translated into practice, Article 20 requires Russia to conclude bilateral implementing protocols with all the Member States.
Sporazumi o ponovnem sprejemu spadajo v širšo strategijo Unije za urejanje priseljevanja, katere poglavitni namen je preventiva in ki temelji na sodelovanju z državami izvora in državami tranzita.
Readmission agreements fit into the Union’s wider migration management strategy, which is intended to be primarily preventive and based on cooperation with countries of origin and transit.
Ponovni sprejem je izhod v skrajni sili.
Readmission constitutes the last resort.
Prostovoljno vračanje ima prednost pred prisilnim vračanjem.
Voluntary return is to be preferred to forced return.
Vendar se strategija, ki jo je Unija sprejela v tem smislu, ne izkaže vedno tudi v praksi.
However, the strategy laid down by the Union along these lines does not always find the proper practical expression.
Glede na to, da je težko organizirati učinkovito sodelovanje z državami izvora, je Unija iskala predvsem poti za hitrejše vračanje priseljencev.
Given the difficulty of organising effective cooperation with countries of origin, the Union has been seeking above all to find ways to send immigrants back more quickly.
Pogosto se spregleda, s čim vsem se soočajo priseljenci, ko so v tranzitu in ko dospejo v svoje države izvora.
One thing that is often overlooked is what the immigrants have to face when in transit and on arrival in their countries of origin.
Politika urejanja nezakonitega priseljevanja mora biti neločljivo povezana s politiko spoštovanja človekovih pravic.
A policy to regulate illegal immigration has to be linked indissolubly to a human rights policy.
Sporazumi za ponovni sprejem se morajo za svojo legitimnost izogniti skrajšanemu ali enostavnemu tehničnemu pristopu k pojavu nezakonitega priseljevanja, v prid humanitarnega pristopa.
In order to be legitimate, readmission agreements must rule out a summarily or simplistically technical, as opposed to humanitarian, approach to the phenomenon of illegal immigration.
Vprašanje ponovnega sprejema ni tako enostavno, kot se zdi na prvi pogled.
The question of readmission is not as cut and dried as it seems at first sight.
Pravičen postopek ponovnega sprejema pogojuje, da morajo imeti pogodbenice nedvoumno demokratično državno strukturo, organiziranost njihovih ustanov in politične prakse pa mora zagotavljati spoštovanje človekovih pravic.
A fair readmission procedure implies that the contracting parties have to have an unequivocally democratic state structure and the organisation of their institutions and their political practice must be certain to guarantee human rights.
Odnosi med EU in Rusijo so v kritičnem obdobju.
Relations between the EU and Russia are going through a critical phase.
Oblikovanje novega sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju po letu 2007 je odvisno od mnenja glede spoštovanja človekovih pravic v Rusiji.
The advent of a new partnership and cooperation agreement after 2007 depends on the perception of the human rights situation in Russia.
Vloga Evropskega parlamenta
Parliament’s role
Če se sprejemajo mednarodni sporazumi, ni smiselno, da igra EP le vlogo opazovalca.
When international agreements are being concluded, it makes no sense for Parliament to act solely as an observer.
Pravzaprav je posvetovanje s Parlamentom na vrsti šele takrat, ko ni več mogoče spremeniti vsebine sporazuma ali preprečiti njegove sklenitve.
In fact, Parliament is not consulted until the stage at which it is no longer possible to alter the substance of an agreement or prevent it being concluded.
Res je, da je Parlamentu v skladu s členom 300 Pogodbe ES dodeljena le pravica, da se je treba z njim o teh zadevah posvetovati, vendar bi ga morala Svet in Komisija kljub temu redno obveščati od začetka pogajanj naprej.
It is true that Article 300 of the EC Treaty provides merely for Parliament to be consulted in cases of this kind.
Pri tem gre namreč za dolžnost lojalnega sodelovanja (člen 10 Pogodbe ES), ki ureja odnose med državami članicami in institucijami Skupnosti ter tudi odnose med samimi institucijami.
On the other hand, the Council and Commission should keep Parliament regularly informed once negotiations have opened: the duty to cooperate in good faith (Article 10 of the Treaty) applies not only to relations between the Member States and the Community institutions, but also to relations between the institutions themselves.
Parlament bo v prihodnosti še naprej pozival Svet in Komisijo k spoštovanju te obveznosti obveščanja, kadarkoli bo EU sklepala sporazume z državami nečlanicami.
Parliament will continue to call on the Council and Commission to fulfil this information obligation whenever the EU concludes agreements in the future with non-member countries.
Parlament pozdravlja dejstvo, da bo kmalu sprejeta direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih standardih in postopkih za vračanje državljanov tretjih držav, ki nezakonito prebivajo v EU ( KOM(2005)0391 – 2005/0167(COD) ), ki se sprejema s postopkom soodločanja in katere temeljna načela je treba upoštevati pri vseh posebnih sporazumih o ponovnem sprejemu.
Parliament welcomes the fact that a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals ( COM(2005)0391 – 2005/0167(COD) ) is shortly to come into being; this directive is subject to codecision and its essential principles must be observed in every specific readmission agreement.
Vprašanje mednarodnih sporazumov, ki vključujejo kompleksno tematiko preseljevanja, zahteva sprejemanje evropskih odločitev na demokratičnih temeljih.
The question of international agreements and the complex subject of migration which they involve demand that European decisions be taken on a democratic footing.
Ustavna pogodba bo na področje zunanje politike Unije prinesla potrebno enotnost, usklajenost in pristojnost Parlamenta.
Furthermore, the Constitutional Treaty will bring the necessary unity, coherence, and parliamentary decision-making power to the Union’s external policy.
Politika vračanja in človekove pravice: ozadje in postopek
Return policy and human rights: background and procedural conditions
Človekove pravice morajo v sporazumu o ponovnem sprejemu dobiti častno mesto.
Human rights must have pride of place in the readmission agreement.
Iz tega sledi, da so potrebni pogoji, ki bodo omogočili spoštovanje dostojanstva nezakonitih priseljencev.
This implies a need to create conditions enabling the dignity of illegal immigrants to be respected.
Sporazumi o ponovnem sprejemu so predvsem človeško in ne tehnično vprašanje.
Readmission agreements are fundamentally a human and not a technical matter.
Uniji ne sme spodleteti pri prizadevanjih za uspeh tega sporazuma.
The Union must not fail to make the effort needed for the agreement to succeed.
Da bi vzpostavila skupno območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, je Unija izjavila, da bo podprla reformo sodnega sistema v Rusiji in upravljanja z njenimi državnimi mejami.
With a view to establishing a common area of freedom, security, and justice, the Union has declared that it will support reform of the judicial system in Russia and management of the country’s borders.
Parlament poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj storita vse za dosego tega cilja in naj tudi spodbujata usposabljanje uradnikov mejnih organov in organov, pristojnih za priseljevanje.
Parliament urges the Council and Commission to make every effort to that end and also to promote training courses for border and immigration officials.
Parlament trdi, da je treba v Rusiji izboljšati sposobnost nadzora nad preseljevanjem, da bi ruski organi lahko prevzeli odgovornosti, ki jim bodo dodeljene s sporazumom o ponovnem sprejemu, kakor hitro bo le-ta začel veljati.
Parliament maintains that Russia’s ability to manage migration must be improved so as to enable the Russian authorities to assume the responsibilities that will fall to them under the readmission agreement as soon as it enters into force.
Parlament je zaskrbljen, ker ni nobenega regulativnega okvira za izvajanje sporazuma.
Parliament is worried that there is no regulatory framework for implementing the agreement.
Parlament Komisijo poziva, da ruskim oblastem omogoči dostop do strokovnega znanja, ki ga te potrebujejo za izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi.
Parliament urges the Commission to provide the Russian authorities with the expertise needed if Russia is to fulfil its obligations in accordance with international standards.
Parlament poziva k čedalje intenzivnejšemu dialogu z Rusijo o človekovih pravicah.
Parliament is calling for an increasingly more intensive dialogue with Russia on human rights.
Rusija še ni ratificirala protokola št. 6 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, ki ukinja smrtno kazen v mirnem času; ni podpisala izbirnega protokola h Konvenciji Združenih narodov proti mučenju in drugim krutim, nečloveškim ali poniževalnim kaznim ali ravnanju; ni ratificirala Haaške konvencije o civilnopravnih vidikih mednarodnih ugrabitev otrok; ne sodeluje popolnoma s Svetom Evrope in z odbori Združenih narodov za preprečevanje mučenja; ni zaključila postopka ratifikacije Evropske socialne listine; in ni reformirala svojega javnega tožilstva v skladu s zavezami, ki jih je dala v Svetu Evrope.
Russia has not yet ratified Protocol No 6 to the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the abolition of the death penalty in peacetime; it has not signed the Optional Protocol to the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; it has not ratified the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction; it is not cooperating fully with the Council of Europe and United Nations committees for the prevention of torture; it has not completed the procedure for ratifying the European Social Charter; and it has not reformed its public prosecution service in keeping with the undertakings that it gave in the Council of Europe.
Čeprav se besedilo sporazuma konkretno nanaša na mednarodne pogodbe, ki so jih podpisale pogodbenice (člen 18), je legitimno vztrajati, da je treba preiskati in preveriti, ali je ponovni sprejem izseljencev s strani ruskih oblasti skladen z najvišjimi standardi spoštovanja človekovih pravic.
Although the text of the agreement refers specifically to the international treaties signed by the parties (Article 18), it is legitimate to insist that searching scrutiny be brought to bear with a view to ascertaining that the readmission of immigrants by the Russian authorities is compatible with the highest standards of human rights.
Čedalje pogostejša poročila, da Rusija postaja avtoritarna, Parlament sprejema z veliko zaskrbljenostjo (gl. mdr. resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o odnosih EU-Rusija , UL C 117, 18.5.2005, str.
The increasingly frequent reports that Russia is drifting towards authoritarianism are causing extreme disquiet in Parliament (cf., among others, the European Parliament resolution on EU-Russia relations , OJ C 117E, 18.5.2006, p.
235, in resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o človekovih pravicah v Rusiji in o novi zakonodaji o NVO , P6_TA(2005)0534 ).
235, and the European Parliament resolution on human rights in Russia and the new NGO legislation , P6_TA(2005)0534 ).
Politika vračanja, ki je v skladu z vrednotami Unije, ne more biti osnovana na popolnoma represivnem pristopu reda in miru, temveč jo morajo spremljati še druge politike.
A return policy consistent with Union values cannot be based on a purely repressive law-and-order approach, but must be encompassed instead within the wider scope of other policies.
Potreben je akcijski načrt , ki bo stremel k
What is in fact needed is an action plan aimed at
i) poglabljanju razvojnega sodelovanja z državami izvora;
i) intensifying development cooperation with countries of origin;
ii) ocenjevanju dejanskega obsega vračanja, ki ga izvajajo države članice;
ii) gauging the actual extent of the repatriations carried out by Member States;
iii) vzpostavitvi skupnih nadzornih mehanizmov, ki jih je treba vzpostaviti z državami, s katerimi ima EU sporazume ali določbe o ponovnem sprejemu;
iii) devising joint supervision arrangements to be set up with the countries with which readmission agreements or clauses have been negotiated;
iv) prizadevanjem za usklajenost med EU in državami članicami, kar zadeva usposabljanje in izvajanje dvostranskih sporazumov;
iv) actively promoting coherence between the Union and the Member States where training and the implementation of bilateral agreements are concerned;
v) spodbujanju intenzivnejšega in bolj strukturiranega dialoga z uradom visokega predstavnika Združenih narodov za begunce in s Svetom Evrope.
v) fostering more intensive and structured dialogue with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and with the Council of Europe.
Resnično lahko rečemo, da čakajo zunanjo politiko EU veliki izzivi, pri tem pa je priseljevanje eden od najpomembnejših in občutljivih vidikov te politike.
It can truly be said that there is a huge challenge facing the Union’s external policy, immigration being one of the most important and sensitive aspects of that policy.
Priseljevanje od EU zahteva uravnoteženje njenih odgovornosti za vstop in vračanje, kar še ni bilo doseženo.
Immigration requires the Union’s responsibilities for entry and return to be brought into balance, and this has not yet been achieved.
Potreben je integriran pristop, ki bo zaobjel preseljevanje v obeh smereh.
It requires an integrated approach encompassing migration in both directions.
Izziv, s katerim smo soočeni, je oblikovanje novega institucionalnega reda v EU, ki bo omogočal določitev skupne strategije in razširitev pristojnosti EP na to področje kot celoto.
The challenge is to create a new institutional order within the Union allowing a joint strategy to be laid down and Parliament’s decision-making power to extend to the subject as a whole.
Edina možnost je demokratična racionalnost, z drugimi besedami postopek soodločanja.
The only possible option is democratic rationality, in other words a codecision procedure.