natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Brez poseganja v že sprejete izvedbene ukrepe uporaba določb iz te uredbe, ki predvidevajo sprejetje tehničnih pravil in sklepov, preneha veljati štiri leta po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
Without prejudice to any implementing measures already adopted, application of the provisions of this Regulation which provide for the adoption of technical rules and decisions shall cease four years after the entry into force of this Regulation.
Na predlog Komisije lahko Evropski parlament in Svet podaljšata obdobje veljavnosti ustreznih določb v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe in s tem namenom preverita te določbe pred iztekom štiriletnega obdobja.
Acting on a proposal from the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council may extend the period of validity of the relevant provisions, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty, and, with that aim in view, shall review those provisions prior to expiry of the four-year period.
Odbor sprejme svoj poslovnik.
The committee shall adopt its rules of procedure
Upravičenost udeležencev
Eligibility of Participants
Pogodbenih obveznosti, ki omogočajo privilegirano sodelovanje pri programih ali ukrepih financiranih v okviru instrumenta, se ne sklepa z organi, javnimi ustanovami ali zasebnimi akterji, ki neposredno sodelujejo pri kršenju mednarodnega prava, ga dejavno omogočajo ali dejavno pridobivajo iz njega ugodnosti.
No contractual engagements enabling privileged participation in Instrument-financed programmes or measures shall be concluded with any authority, public institution or private actor directly participating in, actively facilitating or actively deriving benefit from the violation of international law.
Svet lahko na predlog Komisije s kvalificirano večino sprejme, brez poseganja v določbe v zvezi z začasno ustavitvijo pomoči, ki so določene v sporazumih o partnerstvu in sodelovanju ter v pridružitvenih sporazumih, sklenjenih med partnerskimi državami in regijami, vse potrebne ukrepe v zvezi z vsako obliko pomoči, ki je bila dodeljena partnerski državi v okviru te uredbe, če partnerska država ne spoštuje načel iz naslova I.
Without prejudice to the provisions on the suspension of aid in partnership and cooperation agreements and association agreements with partner countries and regions, where a partner country fails to observe the principles referred to in Title I, the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, may take appropriate steps in respect of any assistance granted to the partner country under this Regulation
Svet lahko na predlog Komisije s kvalificirano večino, po pridobitvi mnenja Evropskega parlamenta , sprejme, brez poseganja v določbe v zvezi z začasno ustavitvijo pomoči, ki so določene v sporazumih o partnerstvu in sodelovanju ter v pridružitvenih sporazumih, sklenjenih med partnerskimi državami in regijami, vse potrebne ukrepe v zvezi z vsako obliko pomoči, ki je bila dodeljena partnerski državi v okviru te uredbe, če partnerska država ne spoštuje načel iz naslova I.
Without prejudice to the provisions on the suspension of aid in partnership and cooperation agreements and association agreements with partner countries and regions, where a partner country fails to observe the principles referred to in Title I, the Council, acting by a qualified majority , after obtaining the opinion of the European Parliament, on a proposal from the Commission, may take appropriate steps in respect of any assistance granted to the partner country under this Regulation
Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu do 31. decembra 2011 predloge v zvezi s prihodnostjo te uredbe in v zvezi z drugimi potrebnimi spremembami.
The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council by 31 December 2011 any proposals concerning the future of this Regulation and any amendments that may be necessary.
Čeprav je predvideno, da se predlagana uredba ujema s časovnim okvirom novega finančnega načrta 2007–2013, nima datuma izteka veljavnosti.
Although the proposed regulation is foreseen to correspond with the time framework of the new financial perspective 2007-2013 it has no expiry date.
Le ta določba je za revizijo.
There is only this provision for a review.
Namesto mogočega ponovnega pregleda mora biti vseeno jasno opredeljeno trajanje programa.
Instead of a possible review there should, however, be a clearly defined duration for the programme.
Program, vzpostavljen s to uredbo, začne veljati 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013
The programme established by this Regulation shall operate from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013.
Komisija do 31. decembra 2011 predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu pregled, da se določi, ali bo instrument še deloval po letu 2013.
The Commission shall submit a review to the European Parliament and the Council by 31 December 2011 in order to determine whether the Instrument will continue after 2013.
Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske Unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Uporablja se od 1. junija 2001.
It shall apply from 1 January 2007.
Glej obrazložitev za predlog spremembe člena 30.
See justification for amendment on Article 30.
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o splošnih določbah o ustanovitvi evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down general provisions establishing a European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument
Poročevalec/-ka Datum imenovanja
Rapporteurs Date appointed
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uresničevanju načela enakih možnosti ter enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri zaposlovanju in poklicnem delu
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (15623/7/2005 – C6‑0089/2006 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (15623/7/2005 – C6‑0089/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča ob prvem branju
– having regard to its position at first reading
- ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( COM(2005)0380 )
- having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0380 )
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6‑0165/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0165/2006 ),
Načelo enakega plačila žensk in moških, ki opravljajo enakovredno delo, je že splošno priznano v primarni zakonodaji s členom 141 Pogodbe.
The principle of equal pay for men and women who are doing work of equal value has already been enshrined in primary legislation following Article 141 of the Treaty.
Na tej pravni podlagi so bile sprejete številne določbe zakonodaje Skupnosti.
On this legal basis numerous provisions of Community law have been adopted.
Od takrat dalje je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v številnih primerih obrazložilo in nadalje razvilo te določbe skupaj s členom 141 Pogodbe.
Along with Article 141 of the Treaty these provisions have since been interpreted and further developed by the European Court of Justice in many cases.
Komisija je 21. aprila 2004 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu na podlagi člena 141(3) Pogodbe posredovala predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uresničevanju načela enakih možnosti ter enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri zaposlovanju in poklicnem delu.
On 21 April 2004, the Commission submitted to the European Parliament and the Council, on the basis of Article 141(3) of the Treaty, a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation.
Komisija želi s predlogom posodobiti in poenostaviti zakonodajo Skupnosti na področju enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri zaposlovanju in poklicnem delu, s čimer bi se vzpostavili večja jasnost in pravna varnost.
The aim of this Commission proposal is to modernise and simplify Community law in the area of equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation, in order to give greater clarity and legal certainty.
V ta namen Komisija v eno pravno besedilo združi številne obstoječe določbe Skupnosti.
To this end the Commission brings together a number of existing Community provisions in one legal text.
Med njimi so direktive o izvajanju načela enakega plačila, enakem obravnavanju moških in žensk v poklicnih sistemih socialne varnosti, enakem obravnavanju moških in žensk v zvezi z dostopom do zaposlitve, poklicnem usposabljanju, napredovanju in delovnih pogojev ter o dokaznem bremenu v primerih diskriminacije zaradi spola (Direktiva 75/117/ES, Direktiva 76/207/EGS, Direktiva 2002/73/ES, Direktiva 86/378/EGS, Direktiva 96/97/ES, Direktiva 97/80/ES, Direktiva 98/52/ES).
These are the directives on the application of the principle of equal pay, equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes, equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training, promotion and working conditions, and the burden of proof in cases of discrimination based on sex (Directive 75/117/EEC; Directive 76/207/EEC; Directive 2002/73/EC; Directive 86/378/EEC; Directive 96/97/EC; Directive 97/80/EC; Directive 98/52/EC).
Poleg tega je Komisija v predlagano zakonodajo vključila obsežno sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti.
In addition, the Commission has incorporated the extensive case-law of the European Court of Justice in the proposed legislation.
Evropski parlament je svoje mnenje podal 6. julija 2005 (1. obravnava).
The European Parliament gave its Opinion on 6 July 2005 (1st reading).
Med takrat predsedujočima državama (Luksemburg in Združeno kraljestvo), poročevalcem in poročevalci v senci ter predstavniki Komisije so zatem potekala neuradna tristranska pogajanja.
Hereafter, informal tripartite negotiations took place between the Presidency in office (LUX and UK), the Rapporteur and shadow Rapporteurs and the representatives of the Commission.
V okviru teh neuradnih pogovorov je bil dosežen sporazumni dogovor.
In the context of these informal discussions, a compromise agreement was reached.
Odbor za pravice žensk in enakost spolov je ta sporazum potrdil 1. decembra 2005.
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality confirmed this agreement on 1 December 2005.
Kot osrednji del sporazumnega dogovora s Parlamentom sta tako Komisija kot Svet podala izjavi o starševskem dopustu.
As a central part of the compromise agreement with the Parliament, both the Commission and the Council presented statements relating to parental leave.
Parlament je seznanjen s tem, da je Komisija v svoji izjavi določila področje usklajevanja poklicnega in zasebnega življenja kot enega prednostnih ciljev v časovnem načrtu za enakost med ženskami in moškimi, ki je bil sprejet 1. marca 2006 ( KOM(2006)0092 ).
With respect to the Commission statement, the Parliament acknowledges that the Commission designated the area of reconciliation between work and private life as one of its priority objectives in the roadmap for equality between women and men which has been adopted on 1st of March 2006 ( COM(2006)0092 ).
Svet se v svoji izjavi skupaj z Evropskim parlamentom zavezuje, da bo izboljšal položaj usklajevanja poklicnega in zasebnega življenja, da se doseže enakost med ženskami in moškimi v delovnem življenju.
The Council in its statement shares the European Parliament's commitment to improving the situation regarding reconciliation between work and private life in order to achieve equality between women and men in working life.
Na vrhu v Bruslju 23. in 24. marca 2006 je Svet potrdil evropski pakt za enakost med spoloma.
At the Brussels summit on 23/24 March 2006 the Council approved the European Pact for Gender Equality.
Poročevalec in poročevalci v senci podpirajo s pogajanji dosežen sporazumni dogovor.
The negotiated compromise agreement enjoys the support of the Rapporteur and shadow Rapporteurs.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uresničevanju načela enakih možnosti ter enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri zaposlovanju in poklicnem delu
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o odobritvi pristopa Evropske skupnosti k Ženevskemu aktu Haaškega sporazuma o mednarodni registraciji modelov, sprejetemu v Ženevi 2. julija 1999
on the proposal for a Council decision approving the accession of the European Community to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement concerning the international registration of industrial designs, adopted in Geneva on 2 July 1999
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2005)0687 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0687 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 308 in drugega stavka prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 308 and 300(2), first subparagraph, second sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6­0061/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0061/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve (A6 0166/2006),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6‑0000/2006),
Kaj je model?
What is a design ?
Ta obrazložitev se opira na presojo vplivov Komisije ( SEC(2005)1748 ),ki je na voljo samo v angleškem jeziku.
This explanatory statement draws on the Commission’s impact assessment ( SEC(2005)1748 ), which is available in English only.
Model je zunanji videz izdelka ali dela izdelka, ki izhaja iz njegovih linij, obrisov, barve, oblike, teksture, materiala in dekoracije.
A design is the outward appearance of a product or part of it which results from its lines, contours, colour, shape, texture, materials and ornamentation.
Model ali oblika izdelka sta lahko sinonim za blagovno znamko nekega podjetja in lahko pomembno prispevata k njeni vrednosti.
The design or shape of a product can be synonymous with a company’s branding and can constitute a valuable asset.
Varstvo modelov zato spodbuja inovacije, razvoj izdelkov in investicije v proizvodnem procesu.
Design protection therefore encourages innovation and product development and investment in the production process.
Izključne pravice iz modela omogočajo podjetju, da uporabi model za komercialne namene, sproži sodne postopke zoper kršitelje in zahteva odškodnino.
Exclusive design rights enable a company to use a design commercially, take legal action against infringers and claim damages.
V EU imajo oblikovalci, ki želijo izkoristiti pravico iz modela, tri možne izbire glede ozemeljskega obsega varstva.
In the EU, designers wishing to exploit their design right have three options in terms of the territorial scope of protection.
Prvič, oblikovalci lahko zaprosijo za registracijo domačega modela, kar jim zagotavlja varstvo na ozemlju zadevne države
First, designers can choose to apply for the registration of a national design, which would give them protection in the territory of the country concerned
Enaki modeli so v državah članicah še vedno lahko različno zavarovani kljub Direktivi 98/71/ES1 (UL L 298, 28.10.1998, str.
Identical designs may still be protected differently in the Member States, despite the fact that Directive 98/71/EC1 (OJ L 298, 28.10.1998, p.
28), ki prispeva k izboljšanju stanja s harmonizacijo nacionalne zakonodaje o modelih. .
28) contributes to remedying this situation by harmonising national design laws. .
Drugič, oblikovalci se lahko odločijo za uporabo sistema iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 6/2002
Second, designers can decide to make use of the system under Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002
Model Skupnosti zagotavlja pridobitev varstva za modele z enotno veljavnostjo na celotnem ozemlju Skupnosti.
The Community design provides for the acquisition of protection for designs with unitary effect for the whole territory of the EC.
Urad za harmonizacijo na notranjem trgu (UHNT) je odgovoren za registracijo modelov Skupnosti.
The Office for the Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) is responsible for administrating the registration of Community designs.
Tretja možnost je vložitev prijave pri mednarodni pisarni Svetovne organizacije za intelektualno lastnino (WIPO) v okviru haaškega sistema za mednarodno registracijo industrijskih modelov.
A third option would be to lodge an application with the International Bureau of WIPO under the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs.
Ta zahtevek omogoča pridobitev varstva modela v več državah z eno samo "mednarodno" prijavo.
Such application enables design protection to be obtained in a number of countries through a single “international” deposit.
Mednarodni sistem registracije in njegova povezanost s sistemom Skupnosti za modele
The international registration system and its relationship with the Community design system
Vsi trije akti so avtonomni, njihove vsebinske določbe pa obstajajo vzporedno.
The three Acts are autonomous and coexist with respect to their substantive provisions.
Pogodbenice lahko pristopijo k enemu, dvema ali vsem trem aktom.
Contracting parties may decide to become party to only one, two or all three Acts.
Samodejno postanejo članice haaške unije, ki ima trenutno 42 držav pogodbenic, med katerimi je 12 držav članic EU (Belgija, Estonija, Francija, Nemčija, Grčija, Madžarska, Italija, Latvija, Luksemburg, Nizozemska, Slovenija in Španija, od katerih jih je pet pristopilo k Ženevskemu aktu – Estonija, Madžarska, Latvija, Slovenija in Španija).
They automatically become members of the Hague Union, which at present has 42 Contracting States, including 12 EU Member States (Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Slovenia and Spain of which five are party to the Geneva Act -Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Slovenia and Spain).
EU trenutno ni članica haaškega sistema.
The EU itself is not at present a member of the Hague system.
Mednarodni sistem registracije modelov omogoča imetnikom modelov držav podpisnic Londonskega, Haaškega in Ženevskega akta varstvo njihovih modelov z minimalnimi formalnostmi in izdatki.
The system of international registration of designs enables design resulting from the London, Hague and Geneva Acts owners originating from a Contracting State to obtain protection of their designs with a minimum of formality and expense.
Mednarodne prijave se vložijo v enem jeziku (angleščini ali francoščini) in se zanje poravna enotne pristojbine.
International applications can be filed in one language (English or French), upon payment of a single set of fees.
Prijavitelj mora imenovati države pogodbenice, v katerih želi zavarovati model.
The applicant has to designate the Contracting States in which protection is sought.
Mednarodna prijava se običajno pošlje neposredno Mednarodnemu uradu, ki po prejetju prijave preveri, ali ta izpolnjuje predpisane formalne pogoje, in nato prijavo objavi v International Designs Bulletin (na spletni strani WIPO
Upon receipt, the International Bureau checks that the international application complies with the prescribed formal requirements and then publishes the application in the International Designs Bulletin (on WIPO’s website
Po objavi mora vsak nacionalni urad ugotoviti, v katerih mednarodnih registracijah je bil imenovan, da bi lahko opravili vsebinsko preučitev, če to predvideva nacionalna zakonodaja.
Following publication, each national Office must identify the international registrations in which they have been designated, in order to proceed with the substantive examination, if any, provided for by its own legislation.
Za kateri koli vsebinski vidik varstva (zlasti vključno z vsebinsko preučitvijo, ki jo izvede vsak urad, oceno pogojev varstva in področjem uporabe zadevnega varstva) se v celoti uporablja zakonodaja posamezne imenovane pogodbenice.
Any substantive aspect of the protection (including in particular the substantive examination carried out by each Office, the assessment of the conditions of protection and the scope of that protection) is thus entirely a matter of the legislation of each designated Contracting Party.
Urad lahko na podlagi opravljene preučitve obvesti Mednarodni urad o zavrnitvi varstva za svoje območje, vendar pa mednarodne registracije ne more zavrniti zaradi neskladnosti s formalnimi zahtevami.
Following examination, the Office may notify to the International Bureau a refusal of protection for its territory.
Takšne zahteve je treba po preučitvi, ki jo opravi Mednarodni urad, šteti za izpolnjene.
However, an international registration may not be refused on grounds of non-compliance with formal requirements.
Ko se mednarodna registracija sprejme, ima v vseh imenovanih državah enak učinek, kakor če bi bil model deponiran neposredno v teh državah.
Once international registration has been accepted, it produces the same effect in each of the countries designated as if the design had been deposited there directly.
Sprejetje Ženevskega akta leta 1999 je imelo dva cilja in sicer:
The adoption of the Geneva Act in 1999 had two objectives, namely:
· zagotoviti vzpostavitev povezave med sistemom mednarodne registracije in regionalnimi sistemi z omogočanjem pristopa medvladnih organizacij k aktu.
· to provide for the establishment of a link between the international registration system and regional systems by providing that intergovernmental organisations may become a party to the Act.
Drugi cilj omogoča pristop Skupnosti k haaškemu sistemu v celoti.
The second objective opens the door for the accession of the Community to the Hague System, taken as a whole.
Območje EU bi se potem za namene Ženevskega akta štelo kot ena država, pravila o modelih Skupnosti pa za ustrezno domačo zakonodajo.
The territory of the EU would then be regarded as a single country for the purposes of the Geneva Act, with the Community design rules as the relevant domestic legislation.
Urad za harmonizacijo na notranjem trgu (UHNT) bi postal pristojni urad za preizkušanje mednarodnih prijav, v katerih je imenovana Skupnost.
The OHIM would become the Office responsible for the substantive examination of international applications in which the Community has been designated.
Prednosti pristopa
Advantages of accession
S pristopom k Ženevskemu aktu bi se vsi državljani in podjetja EU, in ne zgolj tisti, ki imajo sedež v državah pogodbenicah, lahko odločili za mednarodni sistem.
Accession to the Geneva Act would create allow all EU citizens and companies to opt for the international system and not just those residing in Contracting States.
Poleg tega bi pristop evropski industriji omogočil, da na podlagi sistema modelov Skupnosti z eno samo mednarodno prijavo zavaruje svoje modele v Skupnosti in na ozemlju pogodbenic Ženevskega akta iz leta 1999, tako znotraj EU kot zunaj nje.
In addition, it would enable industry in the EU to use one international application protection for their designs in the EU under the Community design system and in the territories of Contracting Parties to the 1999 Geneva Act both inside and outside the EU.
Trenutno morajo tudi imetniki modelov iz držav podpisnic Haaškega sporazuma vložiti dve prijavi: eno za mednarodno registracijo in drugo za registracijo modelov Skupnosti.
At present, even design owners from countries that have adhered to the Hague Agreement need to make two applications: one for international registration and one for Community design registration.