natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V zvezi z javnimi naročili je glavni cilj načrtovane revizije, da Komisija prenese novo direktivo o javnih naročilih (št. 2004/18/ES), da bi se za institucije Skupnosti uporabili enaki standardi kot za države članice.
Concerning public procurement the main objective for the planned revision is the Commission's transposition of the new procurement directive (No. 2004/18 EC) in order to apply the same standards to the Community institutions as the Member States.
Načeloma bi pozdravil pobude, ki bi poenostavile upravljanje in ustvarile boljše ravnovesje med tveganjem in nadzorom.
In principle, I would welcome initiatives which simplified administration and created a better balance between risk and control.
Vseeno je pomembno, da poenostavitev ne povzroči nepotrebno zapletenih uredb.
It is, however, important that simplification does not result in unnecessarily complicated regulations.
Obstoj številnih izjem od proračunskih načel (enotnost, univerzalnost, enoletnost itd.) bi lahko še bolj zapletel upravljanje.
A situation with a lot of exemptions from the budgetary principles (unity, universality, annuality etc.) might also complicate administration even more.
Pozdravljam zamisel o jasnosti in krepitvi pravil o izterjavi terjatev.
I welcome the idea of clarity and strengthening the rules on recovery of amounts receivable.
To je v skladu s posebnim poročilom Sodišča št. 3/2004 o izterjavi nerednih plačil v okviru skupne kmetijske politike.
This is in line with the Court's Special Report No. 3/2004, on recovery of irregular payments under the Common Agricultural Policy.
V skladu s členom 248(3) Pogodbe ES se revizije v državah članicah opravijo v povezavi z nacionalnimi revizijskimi organi ali – če ti nimajo potrebne pristojnosti – s pristojnimi nacionalnimi službami.
According to the EC Treaty, Article 248(3), audits in the Member States shall be carried out in liaison with national audit bodies or, if these do not have the necessary powers, with the competent national departments.
Računsko sodišče in nacionalni revizijski organi držav članic sodelujejo v duhu zaupanja, pri čemer ohranjajo svojo neodvisnost.
The Court of Auditors and the national audit bodies of the Member States shall co-operate in a spirit of trust while maintaining their independence.
80 % odhodkov EU porabijo Komisija in države članice v deljenem upravljanju.
80% of the EU's expenditure is spent in shared management by the Commission and the Member States.
Čeprav je Komisija doživela obsežen proces reform, takšnih izboljšav ni bilo mogoče vedno opaziti na ravni držav članic.
While the Commission has undergone an extensive reform process such improvements have not always been seen at Member State level.
Zadnje letno poročilo Sodišča potrjuje, da še vedno obstajajo resne pomanjkljivosti sistemov nadzora v državah članicah, čeprav se njihov obseg in posledice od države do države razlikujejo.
The Court's latest Annual Report confirms that there are still serious weaknesses in the control systems in the Member States although the extent and consequences vary from country to country.
Sodišče je izdalo Mnenje št. 2/2004 o „modelu enotne revizije“, ki izhaja iz pripomb Parlamenta med razrešnico iz leta 2000.
The Court issued its Opinion No. 2/2004 concerning the 'Single Audit model' inspired by the Parliament's comments during the 2000 discharge.
Sodišče je poudarilo pomen vzpostavitve skladnega okvira notranje kontrole Skupnosti s skupnimi standardi za nadzor.
The Court emphasized the importance of establishing a coherent Community Internal Control Framework with common standards for controls.
Mnenju Sodišča je potem sledil časovni načrt Komisije in delovni dokument o „oceni pomanjkljivosti“.
The Court's opinion has since been followed up by the Commission's Roadmap and the working paper on 'gap assessment'.
Z uporabo teh dokumentov za dosego cilja ter delovnih dokumentov finančnega seminarja (Del III) bi lahko predvidel scenarij, po katerem bi nacionalni revizijski organi izdali letno izjavo in poročilo o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij, ki bi se poslala nacionalnim parlamentom.
Using these documents as stepping stones, as well as the working documents to the financial seminar (Part III), I could envisage a scenario where National Audit Institutions issued a yearly statement and report on the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions to be sent to the National Parliaments.
Če bi sprejeli prednosti takšnega postopka, bi se izjave, ki bi jih izdali NRO, lahko uporabile za letna poročila Komisije o delu.
If one accepted the merits of such a procedure, the statements issued by the NAIs could be used for the Commission's Annual Activity Reports.
Čeprav se ne pričakuje, da bi NRO poročali institucijam EU, se poročila NRO lahko uporabijo v ta namen, ker so običajno javna.
Although NAIs are not expected to report to EU institutions, they might well be used in that context, as reports from NAIs are usually public.
NRO so zelo primerni za prispevanje k izboljšanju sistemov notranjega nadzora v svoji državi.
The NAIs are well suited to contribute to the improvements of the internal control systems in their own countries.
Primeri za to so vzporedne revizije o uporabi strukturnih skladov in poročila o finančnem poslovodenju EU (med drugim s strani nacionalnih revizijskih organov iz Nizozemske, Združenega kraljestva in Danske).
Examples of this can be seen in a parallel audit on the application of structural funds and in the reports on EU financial management (by the Netherlands, UK and Danish National Audit Institutions among others).
Primer, ki ga je treba omeniti, je tudi poročilo danskega NRO za danski parlament o upravljanju evropskega socialnega sklada na Danskem.
An example to mention is also a report to the Danish Parliament by the Danish NAI on the administration of the European Social Fund in Denmark.
Verjamem, da bo seja odbora za stike decembra v Stockholmu pozitivno vplivala na vzpostavitev okvira za nadaljnje sodelovanje med NRO in evropskimi institucijami ter podpiram tak razvoj.
I believe that the Contact Committee meeting, in December in Stockholm, will have a positive impact on the establishment of a framework for further co-operation between the NAIs and the European institutions and I support such a development.
Sodišče je pred kratkim sprejelo zamisel o opravljanju medsebojnih pregledov.
The Court has recently adopted the notion of carrying out a peer review.
V zvezi s tem bo v prvi fazi potekalo samoocenjevanje.
In this respect the first phase will consist of a self assessment.
Menim, da je to zelo pozitiven korak v nadaljnjem razvoju strukture in postopkov Sodišča.
I consider this a very positive step in the continued development of the Court's structure and procedures.
Veliko izboljšanje učinkovitosti pa je bilo že doseženo z uporabo novega poslovnika, ki je začel veljati leta 2005.
Great improvements in efficiency have, however, already been achieved by the implementation of the new Rules of Procedure, which entered into force from 2005.
Z novimi pravili Sodišče hitreje sprejema poročila, omogočiti pa morajo tudi, da se več časa nameni temeljnim nalogam Sodišča ter bolj aktualnim posebnim poročilom.
The new rules have made the Court's adoption of reports quicker and should leave more time to be spent on the Court's core tasks as well as more up-to-date special reports.
V tem smislu osebno načrtujem, da bi Sodišče ustanovilo novo ločeno revizijsko skupino za revizije poslovanja, sestavljeno iz stalnih članov in oddelkov s specializiranim osebjem.
In this context I could personally envisage the Court creating a new separate audit group for performance audits, consisting of permanent Members and divisions with specialised staff.
Druga možnost bi bil lahko član, odgovoren za dobro finančno poslovodenje v vsaki od štirih obstoječih revizijskih skupin, skupaj s skupino CEAD.
An alternative option could be to have a Member responsible for Sound Financial Management in each of the four existing audit groups along with the CEAD group.
Menim, da bi se s tem okrepil in še naprej razvil koncept Sodišča o reviziji poslovanja, če bi bilo vzpostavljeno strokovno specializirano okolje za revizijo poslovanja.
In my opinion it would strengthen, and further develop, the Court's concept for performance audit if a professional specialised environment for performance audit was created.
V Skupini IV, v kateri sem doajen, zdaj razvijamo nov postopek za nadzor kakovosti in smo oblikovali nova orodja za poročanje o delu, ki poteka.
In Group IV, for which I am the Dean, we are currently developing a new procedure for quality control and have set up new tools for reporting on the work in process.
To so pobude, ki sem jih sprožil po izvolitvi za doajena Skupine januarja 2005, da bi se izboljšalo kakovost revizijskih poročil, spremljanje in načrtovanje.
These are initiatives I have set into motion, subsequent to my election as the Dean of the Group in January 2005, in order to improve the quality of audit reports, follow-up and planning.
Člen 247(2) Pogodbe ES navaja, da mora biti neodvisnost članov Računskega sodišča „nedvomna“.
Article 247(2) in the EC Treaty states, that the independence of the Members of the Court of Auditors must be 'beyond doubt'.
Člen 247(4) določa tudi, da morajo biti člani pri opravljanju svojih nalog popolnoma neodvisni in ne smejo zahtevati ali sprejemati nikakršnih navodil od posameznih vlad ali drugih organov.
It is also stated in Article 247(4) that the Members must be completely independent in the performance of their duties and neither seek nor take instructions from any government or from any other body.
Menim, da Pogodba zahteva dve ravni neodvisnosti:
I consider the Treaty to require two levels of independence;
· dejanska neodvisnost;
· Independence in fact
· neodvisnost po videzu.
· Independence in appearance.
Z drugimi besedami, člani morajo biti neodvisni – in se kot takšni tudi obravnavati.
Members must, in other words, be independent - and be seen to be independent.
Še naprej se bom izogibal okoliščinam, ki bi lahko ogrozile mojo neodvisnost in strokovno presojo, kot so sprejetje zaposlitve ali funkcije v katerem od drugih javnih ali zasebnih organov ali sodelovanje pri finančni ali politični dejavnosti, ki bi lahko vplivala na mojo neodvisnost.
I will continue to avoid situations which might compromise my independence and professional judgement, such as accepting any employment or function in any other public or private body or enter into any financial or political activity which could affect my independence.
Razen tega ne bom sodeloval pri nobeni dejavnosti, v poklicnem ali zasebnem življenju, ki bi lahko vplivala na mojo presojo in sprožila vprašanja v zvezi z mojo neodvisnostjo v vlogi člana Računskega sodišča.
In addition I will refrain from engaging in any type of activity, whether in my professional or my private life, which could be seen to affect my judgement and give rise to questions concerning my independence as a Member of the Court of Auditors.
Nimam nobenih poslovnih in finančnih interesov ali kakršnih koli drugih obveznosti, ki bi bile lahko v nasprotju z mojimi nalogami člana Sodišča.
I have no business, financial interest or any other commitment that might conflict with my duties as a Member of the Court.
Razen študentskih združenj v času študentskih let nisem nikoli imel politične funkcije in nisem bil član nobene politične stranke.
Except for student associations during my college days, I have never held a political office nor been a member of a political party.
Moje finančne interese predstavljajo manjše skupine delnic v javnih podjetjih in obveznice, kar sem razkril v skladu s pravili Sodišča, ko sem bil prvič imenovan za člana Sodišča.
My financial interests consist of minor blocks of shares in public companies and bonds and I disclosed these according to the Court's rules when I was first appointed a Member of the Court.
27 let, od leta 1974, sem delal v danskem državnem uradu za revizijo (NAOD), od leta 1985 pa sem bil član skupine za upravljanje.
I worked at the National Audit Office of Denmark (NAOD) for 27 years, commencing in 1974 and since 1985 as a member of the management group.
Od leta 1995 sem bil pomočnik generalnega revizorja, od leta 1999 pa namestnik generalnega revizorja.
From 1995 I was Assistant Auditor General and from 1999 Deputy Auditor General.
V času moje kariere pri NAOD sem se trudil izboljšati finančno revizijo in danes NAOD pripravi letno poročilo z jasno oceno posameznih ministrstev v zvezi s kakovostjo računovodskih izkazov, postopki in vzpostavljenimi sistemi notranjega nadzora.
During my career in the NAOD I worked to improve financial auditing and today the NAOD presents a yearly report containing a clear assessment of every ministry, regarding the quality of the accounts, the procedures and the internal control system put in place.
Zadolžen sem bil za številna posebna poročila (v zvezi z revizijo poslovanja) za danski Odbor za javne finance, razen tega pa sem bil odgovoren za več notranjih projektov, kot so upravljanje pogodb, razvoj kadrov, informacijska tehnologija in razvoj revizijske metodologije, ne nazadnje na področju dotacij.
I was in charge of numerous special reports (concerning performance audit) to the Danish Public Accounts Committee, as well as being responsible for several in-house projects such as Contract Management, Staff Development, Information Technology and the development of Audit Methodology not least in the field of grants.
Moja funkcija na področju zunanjih odnosov v NAOD je vključevala članstvo v začasni skupini o Evropskih smernicah za izvajanje revizijskih standardov INTOSAI, izmenjavo znanja z nekdanjimi državami kandidatkami, mesto uradnika za zvezo z Natom in EU ter dvostransko sodelovanje z drugimi nacionalnimi revizijskimi organi.
My external relations function in the NAOD included membership in The Ad Hoc Group on the European Implementing Guidelines for the INTOSAI Auditing Standards, knowledge-sharing with the former Candidate Countries, Liaison Officer to NATO and the EU and bilateral co-operation with other National Audit Institutions.
Od leta 2002 sem član Evropskega računskega sodišča.
Since 2002 I have been a Member of the European Court of Auditors.
Sem član poročevalec Revizijske skupine IV, ki je odgovorna za revizijo lastnih sredstev, bančnih dejavnosti, odhodkov za poslovanje, institucije in organe EU.
I am a reporting Member in Audit Group IV, which is responsible for the audit of own resources, banking activities, administrative expenditure, EU institutions and bodies.
Pri poročanju sem zlasti odgovoren za odhodke za poslovanje.
My specific reporting responsibility is administrative expenditure.
Januarja 2005 sem bil izvoljen za doajena Revizijske skupine IV.
Since January 2005 I have been the elected Dean of Audit Group IV.
Od leta 2002 do 2005 sem bil stalni član skupine CEAD (ki obravnava koordinacijo, evalvacijo, zanesljivost in razvoj).
From 2002-2005 I was a permanent Member of the CEAD group (dealing with Co-ordination, Evaluation, Assurance and Development).
Glej tudi odgovor na vprašanje 11 v zvezi z mojim delom v skupini CEAD.
See also question 11 concerning my work in the CEAD group.
Od leta 2004 sem bil nadomestni član upravnega odbora Sodišča, od leta 2003 do leta 2005 pa član prvega odbora za notranje revizije Sodišča, ki je bil oblikovan v podporo novi funkciji notranjega revizorja.
I have been a substitute Member of the Court's Administrative Committee since 2004 as well as a Member of the Court's first Internal Audit Committee, from 2003-2005, which was formed to support the new Internal Auditor function.
Zadnji dve leti sem član poročevalec v zvezi z „delovanjem poslovnika Sodišča“ na letnem seminarju Sodišča, kjer sem bil odgovoren za oceno vpliva novega poslovnika in morebitne potrebe po prilagoditvah.
During the last two years I have been the reporting Member concerning the 'functioning of the Court's rules of procedure' on the Court's annual seminar, where I have been responsible for assessing the impact of the new rules of procedure and the possible need for readjustments.
Ko sem delal na Sodišču, sem zlasti občutil potrebo, da Sodišče izboljša revizijo poslovanja.
During my time in the Court I have particularly felt the need for improving the Court's performance audit.
Del poslanstva Sodišča je, da „je cilj Sodišča prispevanje k izboljšanju finančnega poslovodenja sredstev Evropske unije na vseh ravneh, da bi se državljanom Unije zagotovila čim večja vrednost denarja“.
It is a part of the Court's mission statement that 'the Court aims to contribute to improving the financial management of European Union funds at all levels, so as to ensure maximum value for money for the citizens of the Union'.
V času sodelovanja v skupini CEAD sem tako dejavno prispeval k razvoju in posodabljanju koncepta Sodišča o reviziji dobrega finančnega poslovodenja/reviziji poslovanja in sem večkrat zagovarjal, da mora Sodišče več časa nameniti vprašanjem, povezanim z dobrim finančnim poslovodenjem.
During my involvement in the CEAD group I have thus actively contributed to the development and updating of the Court's concept for Sound Financial Management audit/performance audit and, in several instances, I have argued that the Court should increase the amount of time given to issues regarding Sound Financial Management.
Na področju moje odgovornosti v vlogi poročevalca sem bil zadolžen za revizije v zvezi z dobrim finančnim poslovodenjem, ki so do zdaj privedle do objave dveh posebnih poročil, od katerih obe poudarjata področja, na katerih bi se lahko izboljšalo upravljanje financ Evropske unije.
Within my area of responsibility as rapporteur I have been in charge of audits concerning Sound Financial Management which, so far, have resulted in the publication of two Special Reports, both highlighting areas where the management of the European Union's finances could be improved.
Posebno poročilo o invalidski pokojninski shemi (št. 3/2003) je eno od poročil, za katerega sem bil odgovoren.
The Invalidity Pension Scheme Special Report (No. 3/2003) was one for which I was responsible.
Eden od sklepov je bil, da revizija s sprejetjem ustreznih upravnih ukrepov za preprečevanje in zgodnjo obravnavo določi področja za finančno varčevanje.
One of the conclusions was that the audit found scope for financial savings through the adoption of adequate administrative measures for prevention and early treatment.
Zaradi tega posebnega poročila je Komisija sprejela številne pobude novega osebja in ustanovila psihološko službo, da bi se zagotovil takojšen odziv, če osebje ne bi bilo zadovoljno s svojim delom.
As a result of this Special Report the Commission took a number of new staff initiatives and established a psychological service in order to ensure a prompt response if members of staff were unhappy in their work.
Posebno poročilo, za katerega sem član poročevalec, v zvezi s stroški tolmačenja v Parlamentu, Komisiji in Svetu, bo objavljeno hkrati z letnim poročilom za 2004.
A Special Report, for which I am the reporting Member, concerning Interpretation Expenditure incurred by the Parliament, the Commission and the Council, will be published at the same time as the Annual Report for 2004.
Sodišče ocenjuje, da se lahko v letu 2003 skupni stroški za storitve tolmačenja v institucijah EU pred širitvijo Unije ocenijo na približno 170 milijonov EUR.
The Court estimates that in 2003 the full cost of the interpretation services provided by the EU institutions, before the enlargement of the Union, could be estimated at about 170 million euro.
Poročilo o tolmačenju vsebuje več zanimivih ugotovitev in priporočila Sodišča za morebitno zmanjšanje stroškov.
The Interpretation report contains several interesting findings and potentially cost saving recommendations made by the Court.
Zdaj se pripravljata dve poročili, za kateri sem član poročevalec.
Currently two further reports, for which I am the reporting Member, are in the pipeline.
Obe obravnavata vprašanja dobrega finančnega poslovodenja.
They are both dealing with Sound Financial Management issues.
Eno je povezano s stroški prevajanja, drugo pa s stroški, povezanimi z zgradbami evropskih institucij.
One concerns translation expenditure and the other, expenditure relating to buildings within the European institutions.
Znotraj Sodišča sem bil član Odbora za kodeks ravnanja, kjer sem si prizadeval za izboljšanje finančne odgovornosti znotraj Sodišča z vzpostavitvijo okvira, ki omejuje prekomerne stroške ter vsebuje jasne upravne smernice in etiko.
Within the Court I have been a member of the Code of Conduct Committee, where I have worked to improve financial responsibility within the Court, by creating a framework which restricts excess spending and contains clear administrative guidelines and ethics.
V zvezi s finančno revizijo sem delal na področju posebnih oddelkov za posamezno institucijo v poglavju 9 letnega poročila.
As for financial audit, I have worked on specific sections for each of the institutions in chapter 9 of the Annual Report.
Danska vlada me je imenovala po posvetovanju z danskim parlamentom; govornikom in Odborom za javne finance.
I have been nominated by the Danish government after consultation with the Danish Parliament; the speaker and the Public Accounts Committee.
Zato bi se morali oni odločiti, ali naj v primeru negativnega mnenja Parlamenta umaknem svoje imenovanje.
It would therefore be up to them to decide whether or not to withdraw my nomination in the face of an unfavourable Parliament opinion.
Vseeno bi verjetno želel umakniti kandidaturo.
However, I would most likely wish to withdraw my candidacy.
Glavna naloga Sodišča je, da pomaga Parlamentu pri nadzoru nad izvrševanjem proračuna.
It is the Court's primary role to assist the Parliament in exercising its powers of control over the implementation of the budget.
Brez zaupanja Parlamenta bi bilo ogroženo potrebno zaupanje in sodelovanje med Sodiščem ter Parlamentom, stališče in sloves Sodišča pa bi bila oslabljena.
Without the Parliament's confidence the necessary trust and co-operation between the Court and the Parliament would be endangered and the Court's position and reputation weakened.
Imenovanje Mortena Louisa Levysohna za člana Računskega sodišča
Nomination of Morten Louis Levysohn as a Member of the Court of Auditors
Člen 247(3), prvi pododstavek, EC in člen 160 b (3) Euratom
Articles 247(3), first subparagraph, EC and 160b (3) Euratom
Poročevalec(- ka ) Datum imenovanja:
Rapporteur Date appointed
o imenovanju Karla Pinxtena za člana Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Karel Pinxten as a Member of the Court of Auditors
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS KARLA PINXTENA...................................................................4
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF KAREL PINXTEN.....................................................4
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI KARLA PINXTENA NA VPRAŠALNIK......................................6
ANNEX 2 : REPLIES OF KAREL PINXTEN TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE.............................6
– ob upoštevanju člena 247(3) Pogodbe ES in člena 160 b (3) Pogodbe Euratom, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0341/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty, and Article 160b(3) of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0341/2005 ),
– ker je na seji dne 24. novembra 2005 Odbor za proračunski nadzor poslušal predstavitev kandidata Sveta za članstvo v Računskem sodišču in obravnaval strokovno usposobljenost glede na merila iz člena 247(2) Pogodbe ES in člena 160 b (2) Pogodbe Euratom,
– whereas at its meeting of 24 November 2005 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council's nominee for Membership of the Court of Auditors, and considered the nominee's qualifications in the light of the criteria laid down by Articles 247(2) of the EC Treaty and 160b(2) of the Euratom Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0371/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0371/2005 ),
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS KARLA PINXTENA
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF KAREL PINXTEN
Priimek in ime: Pinxten Karel, Alfons, Hugo, Arnold, Maria
Name and First name: Pinxten Karel, Alfons, Hugo, Arnold, Maria