natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Povečanje števila ribištev, ki jih urejajo organizacije RRUO.
Increase number of fisheries regulated by RFMOs.
Še vedno je veliko pravnih "praznin", oceanskih območij, kjer za določene vrste ni odgovorna nobena organizacija RRUO.
There are still many regulatory "empty spaces", regions of ocean for which there is no responsible RFMO for certain species.
Prišlo je do določenega napredka, vendar so pridnene vrste na odprtem morju praviloma še vedno zelo slabo pokrite.
Some progress has been made but demersal species on the high seas are still very poorly covered, as a rule.
Opredelitev plovil, ki se ukvarjajo z nezakonitim ribolovom, ter uvedba sankcij.
Identify IUU vessels and impose sanctions.
Pri tem so rezultati različni.
Mixed results on this.
NEAFC ima sistem za pripravo črnega seznama ter prepoved vplutja v pristanišče (vendar brez trgovinskih sankcij), kar deloma temelji na delu EU.
NEAFC has a scheme for establishing a black list and preventing port entry (though no trade sanctions), based in part on EU work.
Hkrati pa je prej obsežen črni seznam pri ICCAT skoraj izginil, vendar ne zato, ker bi bil sedaj ves ribolov zakonit.
On the other hand, the previously long black list in ICCAT has almost disappeared, and that is not because they are all fishing legally now.
Spodbujanje enotnih akcijskih načrtov v organizacijah RRUO.
Promote uniform action plans in RFMOs.
Kot pri točki 7 je tudi tukaj napredek pri organizacijah RRUO neenakomeren.
Rather like item 7, there is spotty progress in the RFMOs.
Sicer je to pričakovati, saj je so organizacije RRUO odvisne od dobre volje držav pogodbenic, vendar mora EU nedvomno bolj pritisniti, kar zahteva sodelovanje Komisije in držav članic.
While that is to be expected, since they depend on the good will of the Contracting Parties, the EU could doubtless be pushing harder, which requires the Commission and the Member States to work together.
Začuda pa Komisija pri svojem pregledu akcijskega načrta EU za organizacijo FAO ni ocenila napredka pri tej točki.
Curiously, in its review of the EU action plan for the FAO, the Commission neglected to evaluate progress on this point.
==> Komisija, države članice in druge morajo delati dolgoročno in trajnostno.
==> long term, sustained work needed by Commission, Member States, others
Opredelitev in količinska določitev ulova iz nezakonitega ribolova.
Identifying and quantifying IUU catches.
Sistemi potrdil in dokumentacije.
Certificates and documentation schemes.
Kot ugotavlja Komisija, sta ti dve vprašanji tesno povezani.
As the Commission notes, these two are intimately related.
V okviru ICCAT sicer še naprej veljajo nekatere prepovedi uvoza, splošna smer pa je, da države, ki so se lahko pridružile organizaciji RRUO, trdijo, da so plovila zakonita in se tako izognejo sankcijam.
Within ICCAT, while some import bans remain in place the general trend has been for countries which were sanctioned to join the RFMO, claim that the vessels were legitimate, and thus avoid the sanctions.
Zdi se, da sistem odbora CCAMLR deluje bolje.
The CCAMLR scheme seems to be working better.
Le malo drugih organizacij RRUO je uvedlo res učinkovite sisteme.
Few other RFMOs have adopted any kind of scheme with real teeth.
==> Ponovno poudarjamo, Komisija, države članice in drugi morajo delati dolgoročno in trajnostno.
==> once again, long term, sustained work needed by Commission, Member States, others
Mednarodna raven: Komisija je predlagala štiri ukrepe.
International Level: four actions were proposed by the Commission.
Izboljšanje dostopnih podatkov o ribolovni pravici plovil.
Improve information available on right to fish of vessels.
S sporazumom organizacije FAO o usklajevanju je bila ustanovljena mednarodna podatkovna baza o ribolovnih dovoljenjih za plovila, v katero je vključena tudi EU.
The FAO Compliance Agreement, established an international database of vessel authorizations to fish and the EU is part of that.
Organizacije RRUO imajo različne pristope; nekatere uporabljajo "bele sezname" (sezname plovil z dovoljenjem za ribolov), druge pa "črne" (sezname plovil s prepovedjo ribolova).
RFMOs differ in their approach, some using "white lists" (lists of vessels authorized to fish) and others using "black lists" (lists of vessels to be proscribed).
Kot je navedeno zgoraj (točka 3), je EU v svoje uredbe vključila le črni seznam NEAFC, drugi seznami pa v EU niso pravno zavezujoči.
As noted above (point 3) the EU only incorporates the NEAFC black list in its regulations, so other lists are not legally binding in the EU.
Krepitev mednarodnega sodelovanja v omrežju spremljanja, kontrole in nadzora
Strengthen international cooperation in MCS
EU je v svojem akcijskem načrtu navedla le čilensko-ameriško pobudo za ustanovitev omrežja za sodelovanje nadzornih agencij.
In its action plan, the EU only made reference to a Chilean/American initiative to establish a network for the cooperation of monitoring agencies.
Na različnih ravneh je mogoče narediti še več, tudi v sami EU (čeprav naj bi v tem smislu svoje prispevala Agencija za nadzor ribištva).
Much more could be done at various levels, even within the EU (although the Control Agency should help in this sense).
Omrežje spremljanja, kontrole in nadzora sicer ponuja visokotehnološki pristop, vendar je ravno tako potrebno tudi boljše usklajevanje med EU in tretjimi državami, na primer dvostranske ali regionalne izmenjave z državami v zahodni Afriki.
The MCS Network is a high-tech approach, though, and better coordination between the EU and third countries, such as bilateral or regional exchanges with States in West Africa, is also necessary.
==> sočasno je treba delati na sistemih, ki zahtevajo manj tehnoloških možnosti.
==> work simultaneously needed at schemes requiring less technological ability
Določitev "osnovne povezave"med ribiškim plovilom in njegovo državo zastave
Define a "substantial link" between a vessel and its flag State.
Ker je to že vrsto let eden najtežje rešljivih problemov mednarodnega prava, je to resnično dolgoročen cilj.
Since this has been one of the most intractable problems of international law for many, many years, this is truly a long term objective.
Komisija bi ga morala še naprej podpirati, vendar ta cilj ne bi smel služiti kot izgovor za nepodpiranje drugih možnih sredstev.
The Commission should continue to promote it but it should not be used as an excuse to not push other possible tools.
==>Teoretična vaja.
==> a theoretical exercise
Opredelitev pravic in odgovornosti držav pristanišča
Define the rights and responsibilities of port States
Organizacija FAO je uvedla model sistema pristanišč, Komisija pa si prizadeva za njegovo sprejetje v NEAFC, kar je zelo pozitivno.
The FAO has adopted a model port scheme and the Commission has pushed for it to be adopted in NEAFC, which is very positive.
Vendar lahko EU naredi še zelo veliko za izvajanje sistema organizacije FAO znotraj svojih meja, ne da bi za to potrebovala pomoč organizacij RRUO ali čakala na to, da sistem organizacije FAO postane pravno zavezujoč instrument po mednarodnem pravu.
However, there is much the EU could do to implement the FAO scheme within its own borders, without recourse to RFMOs or waiting for the FAO scheme to become a legally binding instrument under international law.
==> Nekaj napredka na mednarodni ravni, veliko pa je treba narediti v sami EU.
==> some advance internationally, work needed within the EU itself
Partnerstvo z državami v razvoju: ukrep za sodelovanje z državami v razvoju.
Partnership with Developing Countries: one action to undertake with developing countries.
Pomoč državam v razvoju v njihovem boju proti nezakonitemu ribolovu.
Assist developing countries in their fight against IUU fishing
V okviru EU in držav članic so nekateri programi v državah v razvoju dobili podporo, in sicer za posamezne države ali regije.
Between the EU and its Member States, some programmes in developing countries have received support, either for specific countries or for a region.
Za programe se je izkazalo, da služijo svojemu namenu, torej zmanjševanju nezakonitega ribolova, in jih je zato treba še bolj razširiti.
These programmes have proven their worth in discouraging IUU fishing and so need to be much expanded.
Tudi Komisija si za to prizadeva s pomočjo svoje mreže dvostranskih sporazumov o ribištvu.
The Commission is also trying to fulfil this through its network of bilateral fisheries agreements.
Za oba pristopa sta potrebna podpora in sodelovanje v državah v razvoju, kar pa se ne pridobi vedno zlahka.
Both approaches require the support and cooperation of the developing countries, which is not always easy to obtain.
==> Nekaj uspeha, vendar je treba delovanje nadaljevati, še razširiti ter bolje uskladiti z nacionalnimi agencijami za pomoč.
==> some success, needs to be continued and expanded and better coordinated with national aid agencies
Komisija je pri pripravi akcijskega načrta leta 2002 uvedla posvetovanje med službami, ki pa je iz nekega razloga zamrlo.
When the Commission was developing its action plan in 2002 it established an inter-service consultation but for some reason it was allowed to lapse.
V svojem delovnem programu za leto 2007 je Komisija naznanila, da bo nezakonit ribolov ponovno uvrščen med prednostne naloge ter da bo pripravila sporočilo o nezakonitem ribolovu in predlog uredbe Sveta o novi strategiji za boj proti nezakonitemu ribolovu.
In its work programme for 2007, the Commission has announced that IUU fishing will once again become a priority, and it will produce both a communication on IUU fishing and a proposal for a Council regulation defining a new strategy to combat IUU fishing.
Obnovljeno zanimanje Komisije lahko le pozdravimo, namen tega poročila pa je Komisiji posredovati konkretne ideje in predloge za to, kaj bi bilo treba narediti.
This renewed interest on the part of the Commission can only be welcomed, and this report aims to provide the Commission with concrete ideas and suggestions for things that should be done.
Kaj naj stori EU – akcijski načrt za leto 2007
What the EU Should Do – Action Plan for 2007
Poročevalka meni, da bi bilo treba poleg ohranjanja in krepitve točk iz leta 2002 v novi akcijski načrt, ki ga sedaj pripravlja Komisija, vključiti točke, predlagane v nadaljevanju.
In addition to continuing and reinforcing the points from 2002, your rapporteur considers that the following should be included in the new action plan the Commission is currently working on.
Kot v prvotnem akcijskem načrtu bo mogoče nekatere točke zlahka uresničiti, če bo EU zbrala dovolj politične volje, druge pa so bolj dolgoročni cilji, ki zahtevajo sodelovanje ostalih udeležencev v mednarodni skupnosti.
As with the original action plan, some of these points can readily be implemented, should the EU find the political will, whereas others are more long term objectives requiring cooperation from other actors in the international community.
Namen večine spodnjih predlogov je izboljšati in v nekaterih primerih uskladiti obstoječi pravni okvir na nacionalni ravni, ravni Skupnosti ali na mednarodni ravni ob upoštevanju izkušenj, pridobljenih po oblikovanju načrta organizacije FAO.
Many of the following proposals seek to improve and in some cases harmonize the existing legal framework, be it at the national, Community or international levels, in light of experience gained since the development of the FAO plan.
V nadaljnjih razpravah v organizaciji FAO so nastali natančnejši dokumenti kot pa prvotni načrt, različne organizacije RRUO pa so sprejele ukrepe za boj proti nezakonitemu ribolovu, ki so bili v nekaterih primerih učinkoviti.
Further discussions in the FAO have resulted in more detailed documents than the original plan and various RFMOs have adopted measures to combat IUU fishing that, in some cases, have been effective.
Nujno potrebno je usklajevanje na vseh ravneh, sicer bo nezakonit ribolov še naprej izkoriščal prednosti morij, trgov ter zastav z najmanj omejitvami, itd.
It is essential to coordinate at all these levels, otherwise IUU fishing will continue to take advantage of the least restrictive seas, markets, flags, etc.
Gospodarsko in politično ozračje v svetu z liberalizacijo trgovine in prevladujočim ciljem prostega pretoka blaga in kapitala je v pomembni meri prispevalo k razmeram, ki dajejo prednost nezakonitemu ribolovu in trženju njegovih proizvodov.
To a significant extent, the economic and political climate of the world today, with its liberalization of trade and the over-riding goal of free movement of goods and capital, has contributed to a situation that favours IUU fishing and the marketing of its products.
Ob vse lažjem kroženju kapitala in rib po svetu pa ni dovolj sredstev za nadzor, da bi dokazali, da je to, kar prosto potuje, tudi zakonito.
The increasing facility with which capital and fish can circle to globe has not been accompanied by sufficient means of control, in order to verify that what travels freely is also legal.
Ko na primer teče razprava o načrtih organizacije FAO ali EU ali ko organizacije RRUO obravnavajo sankcije ali druge ukrepe, se pojavi vidik STO – "dejavnik zamrznitve STO".
For instance, when the FAO or EU plans are discussed, or when RFMOs are considering sanctions or other measures, the spectre of the WTO is raised - the "WTO chill factor".
Prepogosto se opusti dobra zamisel ob omembi, da morda ne bo skladna s pravili STO, kar se je zgodilo v razpravah s Komisijo med pripravo tega poročila.
Too often, a good idea is dropped when it is suggested that it may not be compatible with the rules of the WTO; this happened in discussions with the Commission during the preparation of this report.
Hkrati pa je to prelahek izgovor, da bi se izognili ukrepanju – EU mora pokazati pogum v svojih prepričanjih, tako da močno pritiska za vsakršne ukrepe, potrebne za preprečevanje nezakonitega ribolova.
But that is too simple an excuse to avoid action - the EU must demonstrate the courage of its convictions, by pushing forcefully for whatever measures are necessary to prevent IUU fishing.
Le težko je videti, kako bi lahko STO zagovarjala trgovino z nezakonito ulovljenimi ribami.
It is difficult to see how the WTO could defend trade in illegally-caught fish.
Ključni korak je, da države članice v celoti izvajajo določbe skupne ribiške politike; kot znova in znova ugotavlja Komisija, obstajajo veliki problemi pri spoštovanju teh določb.
A crucial step is for the Member States to fully implement the provisions of the CFP, for, as the Commission has repeatedly noted, there are major problems of compliance.
Nedavna sodba na Sodišču ter kazen za Francijo sta prinesla bistveno izboljšanje, vendar na žalost druge države članice svojih obveznosti ne izpolnjujejo bolj.
The recent court case and fine for France has led to significant improvements there but sadly, other Member States have not improved their compliance.
Sledljivost rib je ključnega pomena pri preprečevanju tihotapljenja in pranja proizvodov nezakonitega ribolova, začeti je treba pri plovilu, ki ribe ujame, in prek stalnega nadzora nad proizvodom nadaljevati do končne prodaje.
Traceability of fish is key, beginning with the vessel that catches the fish and continuing though the chain of custody to the final sale, to prevent IUU product from slipping in and being laundered.
Poročilo Fraga kaže, da je okoljsko označevanje pomembno orodje za boljšo preglednost.
The Fraga report noted that eco-labelling is an important tool in improving transparency.
Obstaja vrsta notranjih ukrepov, ki bi jih EU lahko nemudoma sprejela brez čakanja na odziv mednarodne skupnosti.
There are several internal actions that the EU could take immediately, without waiting for the international community to move.
Kazen bi morala biti dovolj stroga, da bi odvračala od kaznivega dejanja, upoštevajoč visoke vrednosti nekaterih vrst rib, ki so cilj nezakonitega ribolova.
The penalty should be sufficiently severe to be dissuasive, given the high value of certain species that IUU fishing targets.
Ta zahteva delno velja za ribe z izvorom v EU, vendar jo je treba dopolniti in okrepiti, saj bi morala veljati tudi za ribe, ki vstopijo v EU bodisi v tranzitu bodisi ker so namenjene za trg EU (glej točko 8, ki sledi).
While this requirement exists in part for fish of EU origin, it is incomplete and needs strengthening. it should also be applied to fish entering the EU, whether it is in transit or is destined for the EU market (see point 8 below)
Generalni direktorat za ribištvo in pomorske zadeve bi morala nemudoma na svoji spletni strani objaviti črne sezname organizacij RRUO, vključno z imeni lastnikov in upravljavcev; tovrstno ravnanje namreč ne bi smelo ostati zaupne narave.
All black lists adopted by RFMOs should be immediately published by DG Fish on their website, including the names of their owners and operators, for such behaviour should not be rewarded with any kind of confidentiality.
Seznam bi bilo treba vključiti tudi v zakonodajo Skupnosti, plovilom na tem seznamu pa prepovedati vplutje v pristanišča EU za razkladanje rib, ponovno zalogo ali s kakršnim koli drugim namenom, razen humanitarne pomoči.
The lists should also be incorporated into Community legislation and the vessels prohibited from entering EU ports to offload fish, to resupply or for any other reason except a humanitarian emergency.
Trenutno uredba vsebuje zgolj seznam NEAFC, nedavni predlog spremembe k Uredbi Sveta 51/2006 pa tem plovilom prepoveduje vstop v pristanišča EU.
At present, only the NEAFC list is included in a regulation, and a recent amendment to Council Regulation 51/2006 prevents these vessels from entering an EU port.
Tak pristop bi moral veljati za vse črne sezname, sprejete v organizacijah RRUO.
This approach should be standardized for all black lists adopted by all RFMOs.
Plovilom EU bi bilo treba tudi prepovedati servisiranje teh plovil na morju.
EU vessels should be prohibited from servicing these vessels while at sea as well.
Države članice bi morale prevzeti večjo odgovornost za ravnanje svojih državljanov in jim tako preprečiti nezakonit ribolov ali podpiranje takega ribolova.
Member States should assume more responsibility for the actions of their nationals, to prevent them from engaging in or supporting IUU fishing.
Odbor CCAMLR je letos sprejel nov ukrep, na podlagi katerega morajo države preverjati, ali je fizična ali pravna oseba v okviru njihove jurisdikcije vpletena v nezakonit ribolov in v tem primeru ustrezno ukrepati.
CCAMLR adopted this year a new measure that requires countries to verify whether any natural or legal person subject to their jurisdiction is engaged in any IUU activity, and if they are, to take appropriate action.
Če mora EU to izvajati v okviru odbora CCAMLR, naj bo to splošno načelo.
If the EU must do this under CCAMLR, they should do it as a general principle.
Vpletenost organiziranih kriminalnih skupin v nezakonit ribolov bi moral preiskovati Europol.
The involvement of organized criminal groups in IUU fishing should be investigated by Europol.
Glede na visoke vrednosti nezakonitega ribolova pri nekaterih vrstah rib obstajajo namigovanja o vpletenosti kriminalnih organizacij, kar ne preseneča.
Unsurprisingly, given the high value of certain IUU species, there are indications that criminal organizations become involved.
EU bi lahko izvajala tudi druge ukrepe, za katere pa je potrebna določena mera sodelovanja z drugimi državami.
Other actions could be taken by the EU but might require a certain amount of cooperation with other countries.
Vsa ribiška plovila in ribiška transportna plovila, ki vplujejo v pristanišče EU, bi moralo biti mogoče jasno identificirati v skladu s standardnimi specifikacijami organizacije FAO, ne glede na zastavo, pod katero plujejo.
All fishing vessels and fish transport vessels that enter an EU port, whatever flag they fly, should be clearly identifiable according to the FAO standard specifications.
Poročila o nadzoru kažejo, da veliko plovil med ribolovom ni mogoče identificirati.
Reports from surveillance activities show that many vessels are unidentifiable while fishing.
Mnoge organizacije RRUO so specifikacije organizacije FAO sprejele in enako bi morala storiti EU.
The FAO specifications have been adopted in many RFMOs, so the EU should do the same.
Vsa ribiška plovila in ribiška transportna plovila, ki plujejo pod zastavo tretjih držav, bi morala biti opremljena z enako opremo za opazovanje in nadzor, kot jo imajo plovila EU, med drugim tudi s sistemom spremljanja plovil (VMS) in elektronskimi ladijskimi dnevniki idr.
All fishing vessels and fish transport vessels flying the flag of third countries should be required to have on board the same control and surveillance equipment that EU vessels have, including VMS, electronic logbooks and others.
Plovila, ki prihajajo iz regij s programi opazovanja, bi morala po potrebi imeti na krovu opazovalca ali ustrezna opazovalčeva poročila.
If the vessels are coming from regions where observer schemes are in place, the vessel should be accompanied by either the observer or the relevant observer reports, as appropriate.
Države članice ne bi smele dovoliti, da se plovilo, ki pluje pod njihovo zastavo, črta iz nacionalnega registra, razen če lahko lastnik plovila dokaže, da plovilo ni preneseno v register države, ki po mnenju organizacije RRUO prispeva k nezakonitemu ribolovu.
Member States should not allow a vessel flying its flag to be removed from the national register unless the ship-owner can demonstrate that it is not being transferred to the register of a country that has been identified by an RFMO as contributing to IUU fishing.
Ker EU kasnejšega prenosa na zastavo ugodnosti ne more preprečiti (čeprav je pod točko 1 akcijskega načrta za leto 2002 ali zgoraj predlagano točko 4 več možnosti), naj stori vsaj ta korak.
While a later transfer to a flag of convenience cannot be prevented by the EU (though more might be possible under point 1 of the 2002 action plan or point 4 proposed above) the EU should take at least this step.
Sezname plovil, ki imajo dovoljenje generalnega direktorata za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov (GD Sanco) za neposreden izvoz v Skupnost, je treba navzkrižno preveriti z regijskimi ali nacionalnimi seznami plovil, ki se ukvarjajo z nezakonitim ribolovom.
The lists of vessels that are authorized by DG Sanco to export directly to the Community need to be cross-checked with regional or national lists of IUU vessels.
Generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov trenutno sestavlja seznam plovil z dovoljenjem za ribolov; nekatera plovila, ki jim je bilo dovoljenje že podeljeno, so celo dobro znani povratniki kaznivih dejanj.
At present, DG Sanco does not establish the list of authorized exporting vessels, and some of the vessels authorized by Sanco are well-known repeat offenders.
Za črtanje teh plovil s seznama GD Sanco potrebuje pooblastilo.
DG Sanco needs the authority to remove such vessels.
Vse ribe, ki se razkladajo v pristaniščih EU ali se vanjo uvažajo, morajo imeti dovolj natančne dokumente o svojem pravnem izvoru.
All fish that is to be offloaded in an EU port or imported into the EU must be accompanied by documents of sufficient detail to demonstrate that the fish is of legal origin.
Ribiška plovila, ki svoj ulov neposredno razkladajo, morajo torej imeti vsa ustrezna dovoljenja za ribolov v določenem območju tretjih držav ali ustreznih organizacij RRUO.
For fishing vessels offloading their catch directly, this would include all necessary authorizations to fish in the relevant area, either third country waters or the relevant RFMO.
Plovila, ki razkladajo ribe, ulovljene z drugimi plovili, poleg zgoraj navedenega potrebujejo še dovoljenje za pretovor.
For vessels offloading fish caught by other vessels, an authorization to tranship would be required, in addition to the above.
Plovilom brez omenjenih dokumentov je prepovedano iztovarjanje kakršnih koli rib oziroma njihovo servisiranje (gorivo, zaloge itd.)
All vessels not in possession of these document would be prohibited from landing any fish at all or from being serviced (fuel, supplies, etc.).
Jasno je, da je pojav nezakonitega ribolova mogoče premagovati le s sledljivostjo, preglednostjo in sodelovanjem na vseh ravneh.
It is clear that the keys to overcoming the phenomenon of IUU fishing are traceability, transparency and cooperation at all levels.