natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kakovost zraka je problem v vseh svetovnih mestih.
Air quality is a problem in all of the world's cities.
Tehnologija in inovacije, ki se razvijajo v Evropi, bi se lahko uporabljale v drugih delih sveta.
The technology and innovation being developed in Europe has the potential to be applied in other parts of the world.
Strategija: ambiciozna, vendar vseeno upošteva zahteve izvajanja
The strategy: ambitious, but also taking account of the demands of implementation
Poročevalka želi, da bi se pri boju proti onesnaževanju zraka čim prej dosegli boljši rezultati.
Your rapporteur would like to quickly see better results achieved in the fight against air pollution.
Predviden potek C je bil zato izbran za PM 2,5 , HOS in NOx.
Scenario C has therefore been chosen for PM 2.5, VOCs and NOx.
Naslednji razlogi podpirajo izbiro predvidenega poteka C– :
The following arguments may be given in favour of opting for scenario C- :
*Večje izboljšanje zdravja kot pri predvidenem poteku A+, ker največjo škodo za zdravje povzročajo PM 2,5 , HOS in NOx.
*Greater health gains than in the case of scenario A+ , as it is PM 2.5, VOCs and NOx which cause the most damage to health;
*Predviden potek C– je v celoti stroškovno učinkovit, vendar so skupni stroški v višini 11 milijard EUR na leto znatno nižji kot pri predvidenem poteku C (14,9 milijarde EUR).
*Scenario C- is fully cost-effective, but the total costs, at EUR 11 billion a year, are substantially lower than for scenario C (EUR 14.9 billion);
*Ugoden je v smislu rasti zaposlovanja in potenciala za inovacije.
*Favourable in terms of growth in employment and potential for innovation.
Predviden potek C– bo ustvaril več kot 40 000 novih delovnih mest, ker bodo izgube delovnih mest v kmetijskem sektorju omejene in veliko novih delovnih mest bo odprtih v drugih sektorjih.
Scenario C- will lead to more than 40 000 new jobs as job losses in the agricultural sector will be limited and many new jobs will be created in other sectors.
V primeru amoniaka je poročevalka – enako kot Komisija – izbrala predvideni potek A+ in v primeru SO 2 predvideni potek B zaradi naslednjih razlogov:
In the case of ammonia, your rapporteur – like the Commission –has opted for scenario A+ and in the case of SO 2 has opted for scenario B, for the following reasons:
*Povečanje stroškov, ki bi ga povzročil predvideni potek C, je v primeru amoniaka zelo veliko.
*The increase in costs entailed by scenario C is very high in the case of ammonia;
*Reforma kmetijske politike še ni bila upoštevana in njen vpliv za zdaj še ni znan.
*The reform of agricultural policy has not yet been taken into account and its impact is as yet unclear.
Poročevalka zato poziva k pregledu in bolj ambicioznemu pristopu pri reševanju problema amoniaka, ko se bo začela oblikovati reforma SKP.
Your rapporteur is therefore calling for a review and a more ambitious approach to tackling ammonia when the reform of the CAP begins to take shape;
*Vloga amoniaka pri oblikovanju sekundarnih drobnih delcev je majhna, skupni stroški za reševanje problema primarnih in sekundarnih drobnih delcev na podlagi ravni zastavljenih ciljev C in amoniaka na podlagi A+ pa so približno enako visoki, kot če bi bil tudi za amoniak izbran predviden potek C.
*The contribution made by ammonia to the formation of secondary fine particles is a small one, and the total costs of tackling primary and secondary fine particles on the basis of level of ambition C and ammonia on the basis of A+ are approximately as high as if scenario C were also to be chosen for ammonia;
*Predvideni potek B je sprejemljiv za SO 2 , ker bi predviden potek C prinesel relativno malo dodatnih koristi za zdravje.
*Scenario B is acceptable for SO 2 as scenario C would bring relatively few additional health benefits.
Poročevalka se seveda zaveda, da so cilji tukaj visoko zastavljeni in jih ne bo lahko doseči.
Your rapporteur is aware, of course, that the objectives set here are ambitious and will not be easy to achieve.
Nekatere države članice težko izpolnjujejo že sedanje cilje.
There are Member States which are already having difficulty in meeting the current objectives.
Poročevalka zato zagovarja začasno odstopanje za države članice, ki lahko pokažejo, da so sprejele vse možne ukrepe za doseganje mejnih vrednosti iz te tematske strategije, pa vseeno ne morejo izpolniti standardov.
She is therefore advocating a temporary derogation for Member States which are able to show that they have taken all possible measures to attain the limit values set under this thematic strategy but are nonetheless unable to achieve the standards.
To bo zagotovilo tudi spodbudo za hitro in popolno skladnost z mejnimi vrednostmi.
This will also provide an incentive to early and full compliance with limit values.
Dejstvo, da se še vedno pričakujejo primerni ukrepi na evropski ravni, ki se osredotočajo na vire, je seveda ovira za države članice, ki morajo doseči te cilje.
The fact that suitable measures at European level targeting sources are still awaited is, of course, an obstacle to Member States which have to meet these objectives.
Komisija je zato odgovorna za takojšnjo predložitev primernih ukrepov, ki se osredotočajo na vire, Svet in Parlament pa sta odgovorna, da takšne ukrepe nemudoma sprejmeta.
The Commission therefore has a responsibility to submit suitable measures targeting sources without delay and the Council and Parliament have a responsibility to adopt such measures without delay.
Vsako odlašanje bi pomenilo zamudo pri zagotavljanju ustreznega varovanja zdravja prebivalcev in varstva okolja.
Any delay in doing so would mean delaying providing adequate protection for citizens' health and the environment.
Poročevalka se tudi zaveda, da si družba stroškov ne deli na enak način kot koristi.
Your rapporteur is also aware that the costs are not shared in the same way by society as the benefits.
Bistveno je, da se uporablja načelo „onesnaževalec plača“.
Essentially, the 'polluter pays' principle must be applied.
V večini primerov proizvajalci lahko višje stroške prenesejo na potrošnike.
In most cases producers are able to pass on the higher costs to consumers.
V nekaterih primerih je to vseeno težje, ker ni nujno, da imajo konkurenčni ponudniki zunaj EU enake stroške.
In some cases, however, that is more difficult as competitors from outside the EU do not necessarily incur the same costs.
Poročevalka zato poziva Komisijo, da preuči možnosti za zagotovitev financiranja, kadar se stroški ne morejo prenesti na potrošnika in so stroški za onesnaževalce nesprejemljivi.
Your rapporteur is therefore calling on the Commission to consider possibilities for providing financing in cases where the costs cannot be passed on to consumers and the costs to polluters are unacceptable.
V zvezi s tem želi poročevalka poudariti, da strukturni skladi ter Evropski kmetijski usmerjevalni in jamstveni sklad ponujajo možnosti za zagotovitev podpore.
In this connection, your rapporteur wishes to point out that the Structural Funds and the EAGGF offer opportunities for providing support.
Države članice jih lahko uporabijo za sofinanciranje ukrepov (na primer za opremo za čiščenje zraka v sektorju za živinorejo).
Member States may use these to co‑finance measures (for example air cleaning equipment in the livestock sector).
Razen tega lahko države članice podjetjem pod določenimi pogoji odobrijo državno pomoč.
In addition, Member States may grant businesses state aid under certain conditions.
V različnih sektorjih so potrebni mnogi ukrepi za doseganje ciljev iz te strategije.
Many measures are needed in various sectors in order to achieve the objectives set in this strategy.
Komisija ima pri tem svojo vlogo (vključno v zvezi z ukrepi, osredotočenimi na vire v sektorju prevoza, majhnimi kurilnimi napravami in sistemi za ogrevanje), kot jo imajo države članice (vključno v zvezi z opremo za čiščenje zraka v kmetijskem sektorju in ladijskem prometu) in decentralizirani organi (v zvezi z načrti mobilnosti, kriznimi področji, opozorili za smog).
The Commission has a role to play in this (including in relation to measures targeting sources in the transport sector, small combustion plants and heating systems), as do the Member States (including in relation to air cleaning equipment in the agricultural sector and shipping) and decentralised authorities (in relation to mobility plans, hot spots, smog alerts).
Končno: boljša ureditev in boljše urejanje
Finally: better regulation and better regulating
Evropska unija si pravilno zelo prizadeva za zagotovitev „boljše ureditve“ , saj da je na voljo veliko prostora za sprejemanje boljše zakonodaje.
The European Union is rightly working hard to ensure 'better regulation ', given that there is a great deal of room for improvement in law‑making.
Tematska strategija in spremljevalna direktiva o kakovosti zunanjega zraka sta primera „boljše ureditve“ .
The thematic strategy and the accompanying directive on ambient air quality are examples of 'better regulation '.
Poročevalka je poslušala mnenja predstavnikov nacionalnih in lokalnih organov, podjetij ter nevladnih organizacij.
Your rapporteur has listened to the views of representatives of national and local authorities, companies and NGOs.
Iz mnogih razprav je bilo razvidno določeno nezadovoljstvo z načinom, kako se v Evropi sprejema zakonodaja.
What emerged from many of the discussions was a certain irritation with the way in which legislation is enacted within Europe.
Razen tega se vedno znova pojavljajo pritožbe v zvezi z neuspelo realizacijo ustrezne zakonodaje in srednjeročno negotovostjo.
Above all, the failure of suitable legislation to materialise and uncertainty in the medium-term are complaints that are heard time and again.
Možni ukrepi, navedeni v strategiji, te negotovosti niso odpravili.
This uncertainty has not been removed by the listing of possible measures in the strategy.
Komunikacija z državljani, podjetji in organi na nižji ravni (od katerih se zahteva, da izvajajo mnoge ukrepe) bi bila lažja, če bi bilo jasno, kakšno raven zastavljenih ciljev v zvezi s kakovostjo zraka nameravajo izbrati Komisija, Svet in Parlament ter kakšni ukrepi, osredotočeni na vire, se lahko pričakujejo in kdaj.
It would assist communication with citizens, companies and lower‑level authorities (which are required to implement many of the measures) if it was clear what level of ambition the Commission, the Council and Parliament intend to opt for with regard to air quality and what measures targeting sources can be expected, and when.
Poročevalka zato zagovarja medinstitucionalni sporazum, v katerem Komisija, Svet in Parlament določijo odgovornosti in obveznosti.
Your rapporteur therefore advocates an interinstitutional agreement in which responsibilities and commitments are laid down by the Commission, the Council and Parliament.
Takšen sporazum bi prispeval k „boljšemu urejanju“ in spodbudil demokratični proces.
Such an agreement would contribute towards 'better regulating ' and would promote the democratic process.
Prejšnji/-a poročevalec/-ka
Previous rapporteur(s)
o predlogu sklepa Sveta, ki spreminja sklep 1999/468/ES o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil
on the draft Council Decision amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA...............................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................5
PRILOGA: Besedila, ki so rezultat pogajanj ("komitološki sveženj")......................................................10
ANNEX: Texts forming the outcome of negotiations ('comitology package').................................11
– ob upoštevanju pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti tretje alinee člena 202 Pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third indent of Article 202 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju člena I-36 ustavne pogodbe za Evropo
– having regard to Article I - 36 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
UL C 310, 16.12.2004, str.
OJ C 310, 16.12.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sveta (10126/1/2006)
– having regard to the draft of the Council (10126/1/2006)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( COM(2002)0719 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2002)0719 )
Še ni objavljeno v UL. in spremenjenega predloga ( COM(2004)0324 )
Not yet published in OJ. and the amended proposal ( COM(2004)0324 )
– ob upoštevanju stališča Parlamenta z dne 2. septembra 2003
– having regard to its position of 2 September 2003
– po ponovnem posvetovanju s Svetom v skladu s členom 202 pogodbe ES ( C6-0190/2006 ),
– having been reconsulted by the Council pursuant to Article 202 of the EC Treaty ( C6-0190/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 51 ter člena 55(3) poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 55(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6‑0236/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6-0236/2006 ),
Spomniti je treba, da se je težava pojavila v 60-ih in 70-ih letih z razvojem sistema prenosa izvedbenih pooblastil na Komisijo, s katerimi je pooblaščena, da deluje skupaj z odborom nacionalnih predstavnikov (na ravni uradnikov).
It may be recalled that the problem was created with the development in the 1960s and 1970s of a system for delegating implementing powers to the Commission whereby the latter is empowered to act in conjunction with a committee of national representatives (at the level of officials).
Odbori lahko (razen, ko so izključno svetovalni) preprečijo sprejem sklepa Komisije o izvedbenih ukrepih in zadevo vrnejo Svetu.
Except where they are purely advisory, such committees could block the Commission's decision on an implementing measure and refer the matter back to the Council.
Parlament je negativno ocenil dejstvo, da ima to pravico le odbor in ne Parlament ter da se ustavljena odločitev sklep vrne le Svetu brez udeležbe Parlamenta.
Parliament criticised the fact that only a committee, and not the Parliament, had such a right and that a blocked decision was referred back to Council alone with no parliamentary involvement.
Leta 1993 je bila v postopku soodločanja Parlamentu in Svetu v (skoraj) enaki meri dodeljena zakonodajna pristojnost.
In 1993, under a new codecision procedure, legislative powers were allocated to Parliament and Council on an (almost) equal footing.
Parlament je menil, da dokumenti, sprejeti s postopkom soodločanja, v katerem Svet in Parlament skupaj preneseta izvedbene ukrepe pomeni, da morata oba sodelovati pri opredeljevanju postopka izvajanja prenesenih pristojnosti ter da morata imeti enake pravice pri umiku aktov.
Parliament took the view that codecision acts, in which Council and Parliament can jointly delegate implementing measures, implied that they should both be involved in defining the procedures for exercising delegated powers and that they should have equal rights regarding retrieval or call‑back.
Svet pa je trdil, da člen 202 Pogodbe ES, ki predvideva (le) za Svet, da opredeli sistem izvedbenih pooblastil, ostaja nespremenjen.
Council, however, argued that Article 202 of the EC‑Treaty remained unchanged, providing for Council (alone) to define the system for implementing powers.
Za Parlament je pomemben korak naprej (ki je sedaj možen kot izid pogajanj s Svetom in Komisijo) to, da bo Parlament lahko nasprotoval sprejetju "kvazi zakonodajnih" izvedbenih ukrepov, s katerimi se ne strinja.
The key step forward for Parliament which is possible now as outcome of negotiations with the Council and the Commission, is that Parliament will be able to block the adoption of 'quasi-legislative' implementing measures to which it objects.
V tem primeru lahko Komisija poda nov predlog ali predloži osnutek zakonodaje.
If it does so, the Commission can make a new proposal or table draft legislation.
Pot do "svežnja"
The road to the 'package'
Sedaj se obravnava sporazumno besedilo o novem "regulativnem postopku s pregledom" in vrsta osnutkov izjav, ki so priložene besedilu; enega naj bi skupaj pripravile tri institucije in drugega Komisija sama, kar je nedavni uspeh postopka, ki se je začel pred štirimi leti s predlogom Komisije, ki spreminja sklep Sveta iz leta 1999 o "komitologiji".
What is now on the table, a compromise text for a new 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny' and a set of draft statements to accompany this text, one to be made by the three institutions jointly and one to be made by the Commission individually, is the - late - fruit of a procedure which started four years ago with a Commission proposal to amend Council's Decision of 1999 on 'comitology'.
Predlog sklepa Sveta o spremembi Sklepa 1999/468/ES o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil, COM 719 z dne 11.12.2002
Proposal for a Council Decision amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, COM 719 of 11.12.2002
Komisija je ravno ob tej priložnosti opozorila, da Pogodba v sedanji obliki ne loči med podeljevanjem zakonodajnih in izvajanjem izvedbenih pooblastil ter da je Evropski konvenciji predlagala, naj spremeni člen 202 Pogodbe, da bi tako vzpostavila nov sistem podeljevanja pooblastil z vključitvijo pojma "prenosa zakonodajnih pooblastil".
On that occasion, the Commission rightly recalled that the Treaty as it stands, does not distinguish between delegation of legislative and exercise of executive powers and that it had proposed to the European Convention to amend Article 202 of the Treaty in order to establish a new system for delegating powers introducing the concept of 'delegation of legislative powers'.
Hkrati priznava, da bo preteklo sorazmerno veliko časa do začetka veljavnosti novih določb Pogodbe ter da se mora sklep Sveta iz leta 1999 o komitologiji spremeniti sedaj, ker ne upošteva dejstva, da v zadevah, ki jih ureja postopek soodločanja, zakonodajno funkcijo izvajata Evropski parlament in Svet.
It recognized at the same time that a relatively long period will elapse before any new Treaty provisions on this come into force and that the Council's 1999 Decision on comitology needs to be amended now as it does not take account of the fact that in matters governed by the codecision procedure the legislative function is exercised by two institutions, the European Parliament and the Council.
Komisija zato predlaga nov regulativni postopek, ki bo Parlamentu in Svetu dal pravico do nasprotovanja osnutkom komitoloških ukrepov, čeprav omejenim na "izvedbene ukrepe…načrtovane za izvajanje večinoma bistvenih vidikov osnovnih instrumentov ali za prilagoditev nekaterih drugih vidikov".
The Commission proposed therefore a new regulatory procedure giving Parliament and the Council a right to object to draft comitology measures, though limited to 'executive measures... designed to widely implement the essential aspects of the basic instrument or adapt certain other aspects of it'.
Točka b) člena 2a predlaganega novega postopka Ta pravica se ne omejuje več na primere, ko je Komisija domnevno prekoračila svoja izvedbena pooblastila, kot v "pravici do nadzora" Parlamenta v obstoječem sistemu.
Article 2a letter b) of the proposed new procedure This right was no longer limited to cases where the Commission had allegedly exceeded its implementing powers, as in the Parliament's 'droit de regard' under the existing regime.
Predlog je bil predstavljen kot "prvotna reforma obstoječega sistema kot začasni ukrep do vzpostavitve novega sistema prenašanja pooblastil v novi Pogodbi ... z uporabo največjega učinka pravnega okvira, ki ga daje sedanja Pogodba, ki ne omogoča, da se gre dalje".
The proposal was presented as 'an initial reform of the current system as a temporary measure, pending the advent of a new system for delegating powers in the new Treaty...using to the maximum effect the legal scope afforded by the current Treaty, which does not allow to go further'.
Stran 2 obrazložitvenega memoranduma.
Page 2 of the Explanatory Memorandum
Komisija je s tem predvsem menila, da ker so "izvedbene pristojnosti" dodeljene Komisiji, mora ona imeti "zadnjo besedo", čeprav Parlament ali Svet temu nasprotujeta.
What the Commission meant by this is in essence that when 'executive competences' are conferred upon the Commission, it would have to have 'the last word', even if Parliament or Council object.
To je bilo izraženo v besedilu "Komisija mora svoj osnutek umakniti ... ali sprejeti predlagani ukrep, po možnosti s spremembo svojega osnutka, da tako upošteva ugovore".
This was expressed in the formula 'the Commission must either withdraw its draft ...or adopt the proposed measure, possibly amending its draft to take account of the objections'.
Člen 5a(5), ki ga predlaga Komisija: poudarek avtorja.
Article 5a (5) as proposed by the Commission; highlighting by the author
Parlament je predlog načeloma pozdravil kot "pomemben korak naprej k možni končni rešitvi starega problema komitologije"
Parliament welcomed the proposal in principle as 'an important step forward towards a possibly definitive solution of the age-old problem of comitology'
Obrazložitev poročevalca, Richarda Corbetta, v poročilu pristojnega odbora, dok.
Explanatory Statement of the Rapporteur, Richard Corbett, in the report of the committee responsible, doc.
A5-0128/2003 z dne 29. aprila 2003 , vendar se je poskušal znebiti besedne zveze "po možnosti".
A5-0128/2003 of 29 April 2003 but tried to get rid of the 'possibly' formula.
Komisija je zavrnila sprejem te zahteve, zadeva se je vrnila odboru in poročevalec Corbett je po intenzivnih pogovorih dosegel pomembno izboljšanje predloga.
The Commission refused to accept this request, the matter was referred back to committee and the Rapporteur Corbett following intensive talks reached important improvements of the proposal.
Glede vprašanja, ali lahko Komisija kljub nasprotovanjem vseeno ohrani svoje osnutke ukrepov, napredek v tistem času ni bil možen.
On the question of whether the Commission could uphold its draft measures in spite of objections however, a breakthrough was at that time not possible.
V spremenjenem predlogu je Komisija priznala, da deluje ob "upoštevanja stališč" Parlamenta in Sveta ter da je sprejela obveznost za "obveščanje zakonodajalca o ukrepih, ki jih namerava sprejeti glede na zadnje ugovore in o razlogih za tako delovanje".
In an amended proposal the Commission conceded to act 'taking account of the positions' of Parliament and Council and accepted the obligation to 'inform the legislator of the action it intends to take on the latter's objections and of its reasons for doing so'.
Člen 5a(5) v svoji različici spremenjenega predloga, dok.
Article 5a(5) in its version of the amended proposal, doc.
Plenarna razprava o drugem poročilu ( A5-0266/2003 ) z dne 2. septembra 2003.
Debate in plenary on the Second report ( A5-0266/2003 ) on 2 September 2003
Čas je minil in Svet ni dosegel napredka v zvezi s predlogom Komisije, dokler uvedba določb, ki podeljujejo izvedbena pooblastila Komisiji, ni postala ponovno sporna in je Parlament v besedila uvedel tako imenovane "določbe časovne omejitve", zlasti za sektor finančnih trgov in sčasoma omejil prenos pooblastil.
Time passed and the Council did not progress with the Commission proposal until the introduction of clauses conferring implementing powers on the Commission became again contentious and Parliament started to introduce so called 'sunset clauses' into the texts, especially in the financial markets sector, limiting the delegation of powers in time.
Komisija se je strinjala, da v posameznih zakonodajnih predlogih ne bo iskala ad hoc rešitev.
The Commission agreed not to seek ad hoc solutions in specific legislative proposals.
Nove razmere so odprle možnost za pravi medinstitucionalni pristop.
This situation opened the option of a genuine interinstitutional approach.