natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(17a) Uredba (EGS) št. 2454/93 o določitvi sistema pravil o izvoru bodo v bližnji prihodnosti predmet reforme, zato da bo bolj učinkovito spodbujala gospodarski in industrijski razvoj.
(17a) Regulation (ECC) No 2454/93 laying down the system of rules of origin will be reviewed in the near future in order to better serve the purpose of promoting economic and industrial development.
Uvodna izjava 21 a (novo)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) V skladu s členom 37(6) Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU bo pregled te uredbe leta 2008 upošteval interese držav AKP, vključno z državami, ki niso najmanj razvite države, ki n želijo ali niso sposobne skleniti sporazum o gospodarskem sodelovanju (EPA) v zvezi s sporazumom iz Cotonouja, zato da GSP postane ustrezna druga „varnostna mreža“ za te države.
(21a) According to Article 37(6) of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, the revision of this Regulation in 2008 shall take into account the interests of the ACP countries, including non-LDC countries, not willing or able to conclude an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) in the context of the Cotonou Agreement, so that the GSP becomes a valuable alternative ‘safety net’ for these countries.
Junija 1998 sta Svet in Komisija pri določanju mandata za pogajanje organizacije EPA v zvezi s sporazumom iz Cotonouja izjavila, da bi pregled sistema GSP iz leta 2004 državam AKP, ki niso najmanj razvite države in se ne morejo priključiti takšni organizaciji EPA, zagotovil nov trgovinski okvir, ki bi bil enakovreden tistemu, ki jim ga omogoča Konvencijo iz Loméja.
In June 1998, in setting the mandate for the negotiation of EPAs in the context of the Cotonou agreement, the Council and Commission stated that the 2004 review of the GSP would provide non-LDC ACP countries that are not in a position to join such EPAs with a new framework for trade which would be equivalent to that available to them under the Lomé Convention.
Sedanja uredba sistema GSP ne zagotavlja ustrezne alternative za te preferenciale in bi zato po prihodnjih razpravah z državami AKP morala biti predmet morebitne revizije.
The current GSP regulation does not provide an adequate alternative for these preferences and should therefore be subject to possible revision after future discussions with ACP countries.
Člen 3, odstavek 5
Article 3, paragraph 5
Trgovinski sporazum izključuje zadevne države s seznama držav upravičenk iz Priloge I.
The commercial agreement will exclude the country concerned from the list of beneficiary countries in Annex I.
Sedanje besedilo Uredbe se od obrazložitvenega memoranduma razlikuje tako, da Uredba pušča možnost, da nekateri Sporazumi o prosti trgovini, sklenjeni z državami v razvoju, kot je Sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu (EPA), določajo preferencialni dostop, ki je manj ugoden kot novi GSP, čeprav obrazložitveni memorandum določa, da bo morala EPA omogočiti preferencialni dostop, ki je podoben tistemu, ki je bil prejet prej.
The current text of the Regulation differs from that of the explanatory memorandum in that the Regulation leaves the possibility that some FTAs with developing countries, such as EPAs, provide for a preferential access that is less favourable than this new GSP, whereas the explanatory memorandum states that EPAs will have to provide a preferential access that is similar to the one received before.
Posebni spodbujevalni dogovori so bistven del sistema GSP kot spodbuda za trajnostni razvoj, dobro upravljanje in varovanje okolja ter mora biti zato vključeni v vse prihodnje trgovinske sporazume med Evropsko unijo in državami v razvoju.
The special incentive arrangement is an essential part of the GSP as an incentive for sustainable development, good governance and the environment and should therefore have a place in any future commercial arrangements between the European Union and developing countries.
Člen 3, odstavek 5 a (novo)
Article 3, paragraph 5 a (new)
Ko Komisija izračuna stopnjevanje v odstotkih, je raven uvoza, ki je bila prej obravnavana v sistemu GSP, za države iz člena 3(5) prav tako vključena v izračun.
When the Commission calculates graduation percentages, the level of imports formerly eligible for GSP of countries under Article 3(5),will be included in the calculation.
Za ureditve, omenjene v členu 1(2) te uredbe, so pravila o izvoru v zvezi z opredelitvijo pojma „izdelki s poreklom“, postopki in načini upravnega sodelovanja iz te uredbe, določena v Uredbi Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93.
For the purposes of the arrangements referred to in Article 1(2) of this Regulation, the rules of origin, concerning the definition of the concept of originating products, the procedures and the methods of administrative cooperation related hereto, are laid down in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.
Oblika, vsebina in postopki sistema pravil o izvoru bodo predmet rednih pregledov, zato da se oceni njihov vpliv na izkoristek preferencialov sistema GSP in da bi bolje služili namenu spodbujanja gospodarskega in industrijskega razvoja.
T he form, substance and procedures of the system of origin rules will be subject to regular revision in order to evaluate its effect on GSP utilisation rates and to better serve the purpose of promoting economic and industrial development.
Sedanja pravila o izvoru so strožja kot je potrebno za dosego cilja.
The current rules of origin are stricter than necessary to meet their objective.
Zato je izkoristek preferencialov GSP, vključno z ureditvijo „vse, razen orožja(EBA)“, nesprejemljivo nizek.
Consequently, utilisation rates of GSP preferences, including the 'Everything but Arms (EBA)' regime, remain unacceptably low.
Komisija mora redno ocenjevati in pregledovati pravila o izvoru, s zato da se izboljša izkoristek in se tako doseže namen spodbujanja gospodarskega in industrijskega razvoja.
The Commission should regularly evaluate and revise the rules of origin system in order to improve utilisation rates and thus to better fulfil the purpose of promoting economic and industrial development .
Skupna carinska tarifna dajatev ad valorem za izdelke, ki so navedeni v Prilogi II kot obcutljivi izdelki, se zmanjša za 3,5 odstotne tocke.
Common Customs Tariff ad valorem duties on products listed in Annex II as sensitive products shall be reduced by 3,5 percentage points.
Za izdelke iz oddelka 11 je zmanjšanje 20 %.
For products of Section 11, this reduction shall be 20 % .
Skupna carinska tarifna dajatev ad valorem za izdelke, ki so navedeni v Prilogi II kot občutljivi izdelki, se zmanjša za 4 odstotne točke.
Common Customs Tariff ad valorem duties on products listed in Annex II as sensitive products shall be reduced by 4 percentage points.
Za izdelke iz oddelka 11 je zmanjšanje 30 %.
For products of Section 11, this reduction shall be 30 %.
Pripravljavec osnutka meni, da bi bilo treba odstotni delež povečati v skladu s cilji, navedenimi v sporočilu Komisije KOM(2004) 461.
The draftsman thinks this percentage should be increased according to the objectives stated in Commission Communication COM(2004) 461.
Člen 7, odstavek 4
Article 7, paragraph 4
Skupna carinska tarifna posebna dajatev, razen najnižje ali najvišje dajatve za izdelke, navedene v Prilogi II, ki so označeni kot občutljivi, se zmanjša za 30 %.
Common Customs Tariff specific duties other than minimum or maximum duties on products listed in Annex II as sensitive products shall be reduced by 30 % .
Za izdelke z oznako KN 2207 je zmanjšanje 15 %.
For products of CN code 2207, the reduction shall be 15 %.
Skupna carinska tarifna posebna dajatev, razen najnižje ali najvišje dajatve za izdelke, navedene v Prilogi II, ki so označeni kot občutljivi, se zmanjša za 40 %.
Common Customs Tariff specific duties other than minimum or maximum duties on products listed in Annex II as sensitive products shall be reduced by 40 % .
Pripravljavec osnutka meni, da bi bilo treba odstotni delež povečati v skladu s cilji, navedenimi v sporočilu Komisije KOM(2004) 461.
The draftsman thinks this percentage should be increased according to the objectives stated in the Commission Communication COM(2004) 461.
Za uporabo nižje preferenčne stopnje za alkoholne pijače ni nobenega opravičila (oznaka KN 2207).
There is no justification for applying a lower preferential margin to alcoholic beverages (CN code 2207).
Člen 9, odstavek 1 alinea 2 a (novo)
Article 9, paragraph 1, indent 2 a (new)
– zaradi posebnega razloga in za zacasno obdobje ni bilo mogoce ratificirati vseh zahtevanih konvencij, vendar je bila izkazanega izpolnjevanja obveznosti in posledicno skladnost z naceli in pravicami, ki so navedene v konvenciji, ob upoštevanju, da bo v prihodnosti prišlo do ratifikacije konvencij in;
- for a specific reason and for a temporary period is not able to ratify all the required conventions, but has shown commitment to and subsequent compliance with the principles and rights enshrined in the conventions, provided that it will, in the foreseeable future, ratify the conventions, and;
Ta predlog spremembe sledi primeru Salvadorja, katerega ustava sedaj ne dovoljuje ratifikacije Konvencije 87 o pravici do zbiranja ter Konvencije 98 o pravicah organiziranega in kolektivnega dogovarjanja.
This amendment is inspired by the example of El Salvador, whose Constitution at present time does not allow ratification of Convention 87 relative to freedom of association and Convention 98 relative to collective negotiation.
Če Salvador v bližnji prihodnosti izkaže pripravljenost za preoblikovanje ustave in če spoštuje načela konvencij, se mora začasno dovoliti, da izkoristi ugodnosti posebnega spodbujevalnega dogovora o sistemu GSP.
If El Salvador shows that is willing to reform its Constitution in the near future, and in practice respects the principles of the Conventions, it should temporarily be allowed to benefit from the GSP Special Incentive Arrangement.
Člen 9, odstavek 1, zadnji stavek
Article 9, paragraph 1, last sentence
V vsakem primeru morajo države upravičenke ratificirati 27 konvencij do 31. decembra 2008.
In any case, the 27 conventions have to be ratified by the beneficiary countries by 31 December 2008 .
V vsakem primeru morajo države upravičenke ratificirati 27 konvencij v štirih letih po dodelitvi posebnega spodbujevalnega dogovora.
In any case, the 27 conventions have to be ratified by the beneficiary countries within 4 years after first being granted the special incentive arrangement .
Zato ob začetku veljavnosti te uredbe ne sme biti omejeni na države, ki so dovolj razvite, ampak mora ostati spodbuda še v naslednjih letih.
It should therefore not be limited to the countries that are sufficiently developed when this Regulation enters into force, but should remain an incentive in the years to come.
(a) država ali ozemlje, navedeno v Prilogi I, je predložilo zadevno zahtevo v treh mesecih po datumu objave te uredbe, in
(a) a country or territory listed in Annex I made a request to that effect within three months after the date of publication of this Regulation , and
Če prejme Komisija zahtevo skupaj s podatki iz člena 10(2), to zahtevo preuči.
Where the Commission receives a request accompanied by the information referred to in Article 10(2), the Commission shall examine the request.
Pri preučitvi se upoštevajo ugotovitve ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij in agencij.
The examination shall take into account the findings of the relevant international organisations and agencies.
Komisija lahko vpraša državo, ki je postavila zahtevo, katero koli vprašanje, za katero meni, da je pomembno, in lahko prejete podatke preveri pri državi, ki je postavila zahtevo, ali kateri koli fizični ali pravni osebi.
It may ask the requesting country any question which it considers relevant and may verify the information received with the requesting country or any natural or legal person .
Komisija obvesti o svoji oceni državo, ki je postavila zahtevo, in jo pozove, da izrazi svoje mnenje.
The Commission shall inform the requesting country of its assessment and invite to comment.
Komisija mora preveriti prejete podatke pri državi, ki je postavila zahtevo, in v drugih ustreznih virih, vključno z Evropskim parlamentom in ustreznimi predstavniki civilne družbe , ter lahko vpraša državo, ki je postavila zahtevo, katero koli vprašanje, za katero meni, da je pomembno.
It should verify the information received with the requesting country and other relevant sources, including the European Parliament and relevant representatives of civil society , such as social partners, and may ask the requesting country any question which it considers relevant.
Komisija obvesti o svoji obvesti državo, ki je postavila zahtevo, in jo pozove, da izrazi svoje mnenje.
The Commission shall inform the requesting country of its assessment and invite to comment.
Pri preverjanju izvajanja večine konvencij iz Priloge III, kot so konvencije v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami in delovnimi standardi, se upoštevajo Evropski parlament in drugi „ustrezni viri“, kot so predstavniki civilne družbe, vključno z nacionalnimi parlamenti.
The European Parliament and other 'relevant sources', such as representatives of civil society, including National Parliaments, should be taken into account when verifying the implementation of most of the conventions included in Annex III, such as the conventions related to human rights and labour standards.
Pripravljavec osnutka je doda šel „socialne partnerje“, ki vključujejo sindikate, ker je njihov prispevek zelo pomemben pri preverjanju izvajanja konvencij MOD.
The draftsman has also added 'social partners' which includes Trade Unions, since their contribution may be highly relevant to verify implementation of ILO conventions.
Člen 15, odstavek 1, točka (ea)
Article 15, paragraph 1, point (e a)
(ea) nelojalna trgovinska praksa, ki ni zajeta v točko e) in ki ima negativni vpliv na interes Skupnosti, ne more biti pregledana na podlagi določb iz točke e) ali člena 20;
(e) bis serious and systematic unfair trading practices not covered under (e) but which have adverse effects to the Community interest and can not be addressed under (e) or Article 20;
Člen 15 med drugim dovoli tudi zaščito posebno ranljivih sektorjev.
Moreover, protection is also afforded to especially vulnerable sectors under Article 20.
Če prejme Komisija ali država članica podatke, s katerimi bi lahko upravičila začasen umik, in če Komisija meni, da je podana podlaga za preiskavo, Komisija o tem obvesti Odbor.
Where the Commission or a Member State receives information that may justify temporary withdrawal and where the Commission considers that there are sufficient grounds for an investigation, the Commission shall inform the Committee.
Če prejme Komisija, Evropski parlament ali država članica podatke, s katerimi bi lahko upravičil(a) začasen umik, in če Komisija meni, da je podana podlaga za preiskavo, Komisija o tem obvesti Odbor in Evropski parlament .
Where the Commission, the European Parliament or a Member State receives information that may justify temporary withdrawal and where the Commission considers that there are sufficient grounds for an investigation, the Commission shall inform the Committee and the European Parliament .
Vlogo Evropskega parlamenta je treba okrepiti.
The role of the European Parliament should be reinforced.
Komisija poišče vse podatke, za katere meni, da so potrebni, prav tako pa lahko preveri podatke, prejete s strani gospodarskih subjektov in zadevnih držav upravičenk.
The Commission shall seek all information it considers necessary and may verify the information received with economic operators and the beneficiary country concerned.
Razpoložljive ocene, komentarji, odločbe, priporočila in sklepi različnih nadzornih organov ZN, MOD in drugih pristojnih mednarodnih organizacij bi lahko bili izhodiščna točka za preiskavo o tem, ali je začasen umik zaradi razlogov iz toćke (a) člena 15 (1) upravičen.
The available assessments, comments, decisions, recommendations and conclusions of the various supervisory bodies of the UN, the ILO and other competent international organizations, shall serve as the point of departure for the investigation as to whether temporary withdrawal is justified for the reason referred to in point (a) of Article 15(1).
Komisija poišče vse podatke, za katere meni, da so potrebni, prav tako pa lahko preveri podatke, prejete s strani gospodarskih subjektov , ustreznihi predstavnikov civilne družbe, vključno s socialnimi partnerji in zadevnih držav upravičenk.
The Commission shall seek all information it considers necessary and may verify the information received with economic operators, relevant representatives of civil society, including social partners, and the beneficiary country concerned.
Razpoložljive ocene, komentarji, odločbe, priporočila in sklepi drugih institucij EU ter različnih nadzornih organov ZN in MOD ter drugih pristojnih mednarodnih organizacij bi lahko bili izhodiščna točka za preiskavo o tem, ali je začasen umik razlogov iz točke (a) člena 15 (1) upravičen.
The available assessments, comments, decisions, recommendations and conclusions of other EU institutions and the various supervisory bodies of the UN, the ILO and other competent international organizations, shall serve as the point of departure for the investigation as to whether temporary withdrawal is justified for the reason referred to in point (a) of Article 15(1).
Ker se lahko o umiku preferencialov odloča ne le na podlagi gospodarskih meril, kot pred tem, ampak tudi na podlagi kršitev načel, določenih v konvencijah, ki so navedene v Prilogi III, je posvetovanje s civilno družbo (vključno s socialnimi partnerji, kot so sindikati) in drugimi institucijami EU (vključno z Evropskim parlamentom) obvezno.
Since the withdrawal of preferences may be decided now not only on the basis of economic considerations, as before, but also on the basis of violations of principles laid down in the conventions listed in Annex III, the consultation with the civil society (including social partners such as Trade Unions) and the other EU institutions (including the European Parliament) is obligatory.
Člen 26, odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 26, paragraph 2 a (new)
Komisija pripravi študijo o presoji vplivov sistema GSP za obdobje od 1. julija 2005 do 1. januarja 2007.
The Commission shall prepare an impact assessment study of the effects of the GSP covering the period from 1 July 2005 to 1 January 2007.
Študija se pošlje Odboru, Evropskemu parlamentu ter Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru do 1. marca 2007.
The study shall be transmitted to the Committee, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee by 1 March 2007.
Da bi leta 2008 ustrezno pregledali Uredbo je treba izvesti dobro študijo o presoji vplivov na delovanje sistema med letoma 2005 in 2007.
In order to adequately review the Regulation in 2008, a good impact-assessment study on the functioning of the system during the period 2005 to 2007 is necessary.
Člen 26, odstavek 2 b (novo)
Article 26, paragraph 2 b (new)
Odbor bo določil vsebino študije o presoji vplivov, ki bo v vsakem primeru zajemala vsaj naslednje točke:
The Committee will set the contents of the impact-assessment study which will in any event cover at least the following points:
– primerjalno študijo stopenj uporabe sistema GSP iz te uredbe in predhodnih uredb zato da se prepoznajo pozitivna in negativna gibanja;
- a comparative study of GSP utilisation rates under this Regulation and the previous ones, in order to identify the positive and negative trends;
– ocenjevanje učinkov stopnjevanja kazalcev revščine v prizadetih državah;
- an evaluation of the effects of the graduation in the poverty indicators of the countries affected;
– predhodno vrednotenje (z ekstrapolacijo) učinkov na države, ki bodo verjetno predmet stopnjevanja v naslednji uredbi;
- a preliminary assessment (by extrapolation) of the effects of future graduation on the countries likely to be graduated in the next regulation;
– primerjalna študija o preferencialni obravnavi, ki jo ponujata sistem GSP in Sporazum AKP – EU iz Cotonouja z državami AKP, zato da se te spremembe, ki so potrebne za upoštevanje posebnosti nekaterih gospodarstev držav AKP, vključi v pregledane uredbe.
- a comparative study of the preferential treatment offered by the GSP and the ACP-EU Cotonou Agreement to ACP countries, with a view to incorporating into a revised regulation those changes necessary to take into account the specificity of some ACP economies.
Da bi leta 2008 ustrezno pregledali Uredbo, je treba izvesti dobro študijo o presoji vplivov na delovanje sistema med letoma 2005 in 2007.
In order to adequately review the Regulation in 2008, a good impact-assessment study on the functioning of the system during the period 2005 to 2007 is necessary.
Nekateri elementi, ki bi morali biti vključeni vanjo so navedeni tu.
There are some elements that should be included in it, and they are listed here.
Odbor pregleda vplive na načrt Skupnosti za splošne tarifne preferenciale, na podlagi poročila Komisije za obdobje od 1. julija 2005 do 31. decembra 2008.
The Committee shall examine the effects of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, on the basis of a report from the Commission covering the period 1 July 2005 to 31 December 2008.
Odbor pregleda vplive na nacrt Skupnosti za splošne tarifne preferenciale, na podlagi študije o presoji vplivov iz člena 26(2a).
The Committee shall examine the effects of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, on the basis of the impact-assessment study referred to in Article 26(2a).
Določbe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 iz naslova II, oddelkov 2 in 4, naslova III, oddelkov 1 in 2 ter naslova IV se obdržijo za države, ki so upravičene do preferencialne obravnave iz oddelka 2 te uredbe, vendar se zaradi pomanjkanja časa niso mogle uskladiti z upravnimi postopki.
The provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 contained in Title II, Sections 2 and 4, Title III, Sections 1 and 2 and Title IV shall be maintained for the countries that are eligible under the preferential treatment provided for in Section 2 of this Regulation but which, due to lack of time, have not been able to comply with the administrative procedures.
Cilj tega predloga spremembe je ohranjanje preferencialne obravnave držav, ki trenutno izkoriščajo ugodnosti sistema GSP posebnih spodbud (zdravila, pravice delavcev, okolje) dokler ne bodo usklajene s strogimi upravnimi postopki, ki so potrebni za izkoriščanje ugodnosti sistema GSP plus.
The objective of this amendment is to maintain the preferential treatment of the countries currently benefiting from GSP special incentives (drugs, labour rights or environment) until they are ready to comply with the heavy administrative procedure necessary to benefit from the GSP plus.
Komisija zatrjuje, da bo vse pripravljeno do 1. julija 2005.
The Commission claims that everything will be ready by 1 July 2005.
Pripravljavec osnutka nima močnih argumentov, s katerimi bi oporekal Komisiji in zato ohranja datum začetka veljavnosti nove uredbe (1 julij 2005).
The draftsman does not have strong arguments to disbelieve the Commission, and therefore maintains the date of entry into force of the new Regulation (1 July 2005).
Pripravljavec osnutka zato umakne predhodne predloge sprememb 2, 3 in 7.
The draftsman withdraws, in consequence, his previous amendments 2, 3 and 7.
Vendar zaradi potrebe po predvidljivosti za gospodarske subjekte, potrebi carinske uprave, ki se mora pripraviti na izvajanje novega sistema, in zaradi izognitve tveganju nevarne pravne praznine, če pride do razveljavitve prejšnje ureditve do 30. junija 2005, nova ureditev pa še ni izvajana, poročevalec predlaga ta predlog spremembe .
However, in order to respect the need for predictability for economic operators, the need for customs administrations to prepare themselves to apply a new system, and in order to avoid the risk of creating a dangerous legal vacuum if the previous regime is repealed by 30 June 2005 but the new regime is not yet in place, the rapporteur proposes this amendment.