natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ni jasnih dokazov, da bi pri sklenitvi in uporabi najemnih in dodatnih pogodb prišlo do nezakonitega ravnanja, čeprav obstajajo dvomi o tem, ali je bilo popolnoma upoštevano načelo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja iz finančne uredbe;
– there appear to be no indications that there have been unlawful actions in the process of concluding and applying the leases and additional agreements, although there are nevertheless doubts on whether the principle of “sound financial management” enshrined in the Financial Regulation has been fully respected;
– ni povsem zanesljive osnove za določitev primerne najemnine za stavbi WIC in SDM, če je edini povpraševalec Parlament, kot velja v primeru Strasbourga; prav tako ni podatkov za primerjavo stroškov pisarniških prostorov v različnih, za ta primer ustreznih državah in mestih; to je upravičeno otežilo vzpostavitev poštene cene zadevne najemnine in ocene, ali je Parlament res plačeval pravično ceno v preteklih letih;
– there is no absolutely reliable basis for setting an appropriate rent for the WIC and SDM buildings once Parliament is the only potential client, as in Strasbourg; nor is a comparison with the cost of office space in various countries and cities adequate in this case; understandably, this made it difficult to establish a “fair price” for the rent in question and therefore to assess whether the Parliament had been paying a truly fair rent over the years;
– bistveni razlog za rast najemnin v vseh teh letih je, da so organi odločanja Parlamenta leta 1985 soglašali s predlogom mesta Strasbourg o indeksiranju letnih zneskov, pri tem pa niso upoštevali odklonilnih mnenj kvestorjev in Odbora za proračun iz leta 1980;
– a fundamental reason for the fact that rents have been rising for years is that, in 1985 the Parliament's decision-making bodies agreed to the City of Strasbourg's proposal to index-link the annual amounts, disregarding dissenting opinions delivered in 1980 by the Quaestors and the Committee on Budgets;
– obstaja občutna razlika med najemnino, ki jo Parlament plačuje mestu Strasbourg za uporabo stavb WIC in SDM, in mesečnimi odplačili mesta Strasbourg zasebnemu vlagatelju: po izračunih uprave Parlamenta preplačila po 25 letih pogodbenega razmerja – po odbitku investicijskih stroškov in stroškov izvedenih del – znašajo že najmanj 32 milijonov EUR; ker nadaljnje informacije mesta Strasbourg in vlagatelja SCI Erasme še niso na voljo, ni izključeno, da bi lahko preplačila znašala celo 46 milijonov EUR (po notranji reviziji) ali skoraj 60 milijonov EUR (po zunanji reviziji);
– there is a considerable difference between, on the one hand, the rent it pays to the City of Strasbourg for use of the WIC and SDM Buildings and, on the other, the monthly repayments by the City of Strasbourg to the private investor: according to its Administration's calculations, the additional amounts paid over the 25 years of the lease, after deduction of the investment cost and the cost of works carried out, amount to at least EUR 32 m; at this point in time, pending further information from the City of Strasbourg and SCI Erasme, it cannot be ruled out that the additional payments might also total at least EUR 46 m (internal audit) or just under EUR 60 m (external audit);
– šele marca 2006 se je pokazalo, da znesek najemnine mestu Strasbourg presega znesek odplačila, ki ga mesto plačuje zasebnemu vlagatelju; do takrat je Parlament napačno ocenjeval, da se najemnina, ki jo plačuje mestu Strasbourg, v celoti posreduje SCI Erasme, kar pa ni držalo;
– not until March 2006 were there indications that its rental payments to the City of Strasbourg exceeded the latter’s repayments to the private investor; until then, Parliament wrongly assumed that its rental payments to the City of Strasbourg were passed on in full to SCI Erasme when, in fact, this was not the case;
– skozi to dolgo obdobje ni uprava Parlamenta nikoli podvomila o tem, ali je najemnina „poštena“, in ni nikoli preverila, ali se v celoti posreduje SCI Erasme, prav tako pa je mesto Strasbourg o tej zadevi ni nikoli obvestilo;
– throughout this long period of time, the Parliament’s Administration never questioned whether the rent payments constituted “fair rent” and never verified whether its lease payments were being passed on in full to the SCI Erasme but nor was it ever informed about this matter by the City of Strasbourg itself;
– od leta 1981 je samo mesto Strasbourg vedelo za obstoj dveh različnih pogodbenih razmerij med tremi vpletenimi stranmi in se je zavedalo razlike med zneskoma;
– only the City of Strasbourg knew of the existence of two different contractual relationships between the three parties involved and only the City of Strasbourg had been aware of the difference between the two amounts since 1981;
– mesto Strasbourg je 29. novembra 2005 upravo Parlamenta pisno obvestilo, da pogajanja z zasebnim vlagateljem niso bila zaključena; vsaj takrat bi morala uprava Parlamenta ugotoviti, da so med mestom Strasbourg in zasebnim vlagateljem potekala pogajanja;
– Parliament’s Administration was notified by letter of 29 November 2005 by the City of Strasbourg that negotiations with the private investor had not been ended; at that point, at the latest, Parliament’s Administration should have realised that there had been negotiations between the City of Strasbourg and the private investor;
– najemnina, ki jo Parlament plačuje za poslovne stavbe, naj bi zajemala stroške gradnje, vzdrževanja in uporabe, nikakor pa ne marže za državo gostiteljico oziroma lokalne ali regionalne organe v tej državi; običajno je tudi, da se vsako javno zemljišče, ki ga država članica gostiteljica da na voljo instituciji EU, omenjeni instituciji podeli prosto in neovirano; vendar je treba priznati, da to pogodbeno ni bilo določeno zaradi dobrih odnosov z mestom Strasbourg, ki naj bi bil nepridobitni javni organ; poleg tega ne obstajajo zakonske določbe, ki bi državi oziroma lokalni ali regionalni oblasti prepovedovale ustvarjanje dobička; vseeno meni, da je pristop mesta Strasbourg vsaj neolikan, saj je v nasprotju s pravili o gostoljubnosti do mednarodnih institucij;
– the rent Parliament pays for its official premises should cover the cost of construction, upkeep and use, but should not in any way contain a profit margin for the host country or local or regional authorities in that country; equally, it is also customary that any public land made available by a host Member State for the purpose of hosting an EU institution is granted to the said institution free and unencumbered; it has to be conceded, however, that none of this was contractually laid down; because of the good relationship with the City of Strasbourg as a supposedly non-profit-seeking public body; ; besides, there are no legal provisions prohibiting a state or local or regional authority from making a profit; takes the view, however, that the City of Strasbourg's approach is discourteous, to say the very least, since it is contrary to rules on hospitality towards international institutions;
– mesto Strasbourg je vedelo, da Parlament v nepremičninske pogodbe, ki jih sklene, nikoli ne vključi odškodninskih določb, vendar se za to dejstvo namenoma ni zmenilo, kar je omajalo zaupanje med mestom in Parlamentom;
– the City of Strasbourg was aware of Parliament's consistent exclusion of compensation clauses in property contracts, yet deliberately ignored it ; that has dealt a blow to the relationship of trust between Strasbourg and the Parliament;
– obžaluje, da se je mesto Strasbourg umaknilo iz tristranskih pogajanj s Parlamentom, med katerimi je bilo poudarjeno, da je odškodnina za dolgoročno najemno pogodbo med mestom Strasbourg in SCI Erasme izključena; to stališče je bilo potem na prihodnjih dvostranskih pogajanjih med mestom Strasbourg in SCI Erasme spregledano;
– deplores the City of Strasbourg's withdrawal from tripartite negotiations with the Parliament, in the course of which it had been reiterated that compensation for loss of the long lease between the city of Strasbourg and SCI Erasme was excluded; this position was then ignored in the City of Strasbourg's subsequent bilateral negotiations with SCI Erasme;
– globoko obžaluje pomanjkanje dobre vere, ki sta ga v odnosu do Parlamenta izkazala tako mesto Strasbourg kot zasebni vlagatelj SCI Erasme; prav tako obžaluje neodločenost in nedejavnost uprave Parlamenta;
– Deeply regrets the lack of good faith demonstrated by both the City of Strasbourg and the private investor, SCI Erasme in their relationship with Parliament; equally regrets the lack of resolve on the part of the administration of Parliament itself
– poziva predsedstvo, naj z 31. oktobrom 2006 odpove najemno pogodbo z mestom Strasbourg ter se v primeru odloga nakupa stavb pogodi o novi, primernejši najemnini;
– calls on the Bureau to give notice on the lease with the City of Strasbourg for 31 October 2006 in order - should purchase of the buildings be delayed - to negotiate a new and appropriate rent;
– poziva predsedstvo, naj preveri, ali bi bilo primerno mestu Strasbourg za prvo polovico leta 2006 nakazati najemnino, ki bo zadostovala le za vračilo vlagatelju SCI Erasme, ne pa celotnega zneska;
– calls on the Bureau to examine whether it might be appropriate to pay the City of Strasbourg, for the first half of 2006, initially only a rental amount allowing it to cover the repayments to SCI Erasme, but not the full rent;
– meni, da bi si bilo smiselno še naprej prizadevati za nakup stavb WIC in SDM, če bodo pri tem upoštevani naslednji dejavniki: višina primerne najemnine in zato tudi morebitne kupnine ostaja nejasna; starost stavb; načeloma ni mogoče plačevati odškodnin; znesek, ki ga je Parlament v 25 letih neupravičeno preplačal, bi bilo treba upoštevati pri nakupni ceni; zemljišče in stavbe bi bilo treba kupiti hkrati;
– considers that it might be reasonable to continue to seek to purchase the WIC and SDM Buildings if, in the process, the following are factored in: what constitutes an appropriate rent and hence a prospective purchase price remain uncertain; the age of the buildings; no compensation can be paid on principle; Parliament's additional and unwarranted payments over 25 years should be offset against the purchase price; land and buildings should be acquired simultaneously;
– meni, da obstoječe tristransko razmerje v tem primeru ni vodilo do popolne preglednosti in ni zagotovilo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, zato je prepričan, da se mu je treba v politiki zgradb institucij in organov EU izogibati;
– Considers that the triangular relationship existing in this case was not conducive to full transparency or to guarantees of sound financial management and considers, therefore, that it should be avoided in the buildings policy of EU institutions and bodies;
– poziva svoje pristojne organe, naj člen 16 notranjih predpisov za izvrševanje proračuna Evropskega parlamenta spremenijo tako, da bo moral Odbor za proračun privoliti v nepremičninske projekte z občutnimi finančnimi posledicami za proračun;
– calls on its competent bodies to amend Article 16 of the Internal Rules on the implementation of Parliament's budget to make building projects with significant financial implications for Parliament’s budget subject to the agreement of the Committee on Budgets;
– poziva svojo upravo, naj sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe za redno preverjanje dolgoletnih pogodbenih obveznosti do tretjih oseb najmanj vsakih pet let, na primer pogodb o najemu ali storitvah; ugotovitve takšnega preverjanja je treba vključiti v poročilo o dejavnostih generalnih direktorjev; poziva k pravočasni pripravi prvega takega poročila za proračunski postopek razrešnice za leto 2005 in k njegovi poznejši vključitvi v ad hoc del letnega delovnega poročila za vsako naslednje leto;
– calls on its Administration to take the necessary measures for a regular review, at least every five years, of long‑standing contractual obligations towards third parties, e.g. leases or service contracts; the results of those checks should also be included in the activity reports of the directors‑general calls for the first such report to be completed in good time for the budget discharge procedure for 2005 and subsequently included in an ad hoc section of the annual activity report every year thereafter;
– po posvetovanju z drugimi institucijami Unije poziva svojo upravo, naj pripravi poročilo o tem, ali bi bilo mogoče ustanoviti evropsko službo za gradbena dela, ki bi bila pristojna za gradnjo in vzdrževanje stavb institucij in organov EU; poziva, naj se to poročilo posreduje Odboru za proračunski nadzor najpozneje do 1. oktobra 2007;
– calls on its Administration, in consultation with the other Union institutions, to draw up a report examining whether it might be feasible to establish a European Buildings Authority mandated with responsibility for the construction and maintenance of the buildings of the EU Institutions and Bodies; calls for such report to be forwarded to the Committee on Budgetary Control by 1 October 2007 at the latest;
– ugotavlja, da se mesto Strasbourg, še posebej pa SCI Erasme, ni odzvalo na vsa povpraševanja Evropskega parlamenta; zato bo ponovno preučil problem v zvezi s postopkom razrešnice za leto 2005;
– notes that the City of Strasbourg, but more particularly SCI Erasme have not yet met all Parliament's requests for information; will therefore re-examine the issue at stake in the 2005 discharge procedure;
– poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor, naj v postopku razrešnice za leto 2005 znova preuči nepremičninsko politiko Evropskega parlamenta in odslej to naredi vsako leto;
– calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control to conduct a fresh examination of Parliament’s property policy during the budget discharge procedure for 2005and thereafter on a regular basis;
25. ugotavlja, da je bil zaradi upoštevanja finančne uredbe leta 2005 uveden nov postopek za obračunavanje potnih stroškov;
Notes that a new travel expenses settlement procedure was introduced in 2005 in order to comply with the Financial Regulation;
28. poziva generalnega sekretarja, da nemudoma, kot je že dolgo obljubljeno, pripravi kratek, dostopen in zanimiv letni dokument, s katerim bi javnosti ponudili več informacij o upravljanju proračuna v Parlamentu,
Calls on the Secretary-General to draw up immediately, and as long since promised, a brief, accessible and attractive annual document to provide the public with more information on budgetary management in Parliament
30. ugotavlja, da prve izkušnje z uporabo določb nove finančne uredbe v instituciji, kot je Parlament, ki mora izvrševati upravni proračun, v nekaterih primerih kažejo na to, da so bili vzpostavljeni preveč zapleteni sistemi in finančni tokovi;
Notes that initial experience with applying the new Financial Regulation in an institution such as Parliament, which has an administrative budget to manage, indicates that in some cases overly complex systems and financial circuits have been set up;
32. ponovno potrjuje mnenje, izraženo v odstavku 34 zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 12. aprila 2005 in svojih resolucij z dne 21. aprila 2004
Reaffirms, yet again, the view expressed in paragraph 34 of its above-mentioned resolution of 12 April 2005 and in its resolutions of 21 April 2004
160. in 8. aprila 2003,
160. and 8 April 2003
62. da mora „obseg postopka razrešnice pokrivati ne le dejavnosti upravljanja generalnega sekretarja in uprave Parlamenta, ampak tudi sklepe upravnih teles, tj. predsednika, predsedstva in konference predsednikov“;
62. that ‘the scope of the discharge procedure should cover not only the management activities of Parliament's Secretary-General and Administration, but also the decisions taken by its governing bodies, i.e. its President, Bureau and Conference of Presidents’;
35. poudarja, da Parlament ne podeli razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju, ampak predsedniku; zato pričakuje, da bo predsednik pripravljen na dialog z Odborom za proračunski nadzor v okviru postopka razrešnice;
Stresses that Parliament grants discharge not to the Secretary-General, but, rather, to the President; therefore expects the President to make himself available to the Committee on Budgetary Control, during the discharge procedure, for a dialogue;
Poročila o dejavnosti generalnih direktorjev
The activity reports of the directors-general
37. ugotavlja, da se poročila o dejavnosti med seboj zelo razlikujejo po obsegu, dolžini, obliki in obsegu podatkov pristojnih služb; poziva generalnega sekretarja, kot je prejšnje leto (v odstavku 9.16 poročila za leto 2003) predlagalo Računsko sodišče, da uskladi predstavitev in zgradbo poročil o delu, da se omogočita boljša berljivost in primerljivost;
Notes that the various activity reports differ widely in scope, length, form and the degree to which the information from services within directorates-general is incorporated; invites the Secretary-General, as proposed by the Court of Auditors last year (in paragraph 9.16 of the Court's 2003 Annual Report), to harmonise the presentation and structure of the activity reports in the future in order to make them more easily readable and comparable;
40. opozarja na predlog iz odstavka 30 zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 12. aprila 2005, da bi bilo zaradi boljšega razumevanja prave vrednosti podpisanih izjav odredbodajalcev v prihodnjih letih zaželeno sprejetje standardizirane oblike, ki jasno razlikuje med zadevami, ki zahtevajo „pripombo“ generalnega direktorja (ne da bi postala vprašljiva njegova izjava o zanesljivosti), in drugimi daljnosežnejšimi zadevami, ki upravičujejo „pridržek“;
Recalls the proposal made in paragraph 30 of its above-mentioned resolution of 12 April 2005 that for the sake of a better understanding of the true value of authorising officers' signed declarations it would be desirable in future years to adopt a standardised format clearly distinguishing between those matters calling for an 'observation' by the director-general, which do not call into question his declaration of assurance, and other more serious matters justifying a 'reservation';
– vzpostavljanje okvira za notranjo kontrolo zahteva več časa, kot je bilo predvideno,
– putting the internal control framework into practice is more time-consuming than was originally assumed;
– stalna potreba po usposobljenih uslužbencih za finančne oddelke v generalnih direktoratih in dodatnem izobraževanju sedanjih uslužbencev,
– the continuing need to look for qualified staff for the finance departments of directorates-general and to give current staff further training;
– dodatne težave pri selitvi in/ali prestrukturiranju generalnih direktoratov;
– additional difficulties encountered when directorates-general relocate and/or are restructured;
45. ugotavlja, da je služba za notranjo revizijo leta 2004 pripravila 13 poročil o okviru za notranji nadzor in kontrolo generalnih direktoratov ter preučila finančno poslovodenje štirih informacijskih pisarn Parlamenta;
Notes that, in 2004, the Internal Audit Service produced 13 reports on the internal monitoring and control framework in the directorates-general and examined the financial management of four of Parliament's Information Offices;
– v vsaki službi je treba v celoti razviti sisteme notranje kontrole, zato mora vsaka služba imeti na voljo primerna sredstva za vzpostavljanje operacij in preverjanja;
– that internal control systems should be fully developed and documented in every unit and that, to that end, every unit must have adequate resources for duties involving initiation of operations and verification;
– obstaja splošna potreba po uslužbencih z ustreznim strokovnim znanjem na področju finančnega poslovodenja in finančne kontrole, ki jo je treba obravnavati prednostno;
– that there is a need across the board for staff with appropriate specialist knowledge in the area of financial management and financial control, meeting which need must be regarded as a priority;
– razviti je treba tudi ustrezne mehanizme za načrtovanje in določanje ciljev, instrumente za ocenjevanje tveganja in optimalne informacijske sisteme za upravljanje;
– that, in addition, appropriate mechanisms should be developed for planning, programming and setting objectives, risk appraisal instruments and optimum management information systems
Odstavek 40 zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 8. aprila 2003.
Paragraph 40 of its above-mentioned resolution of 12 April 2005. ;
- da notranji nadzorni sistemi omogočajo redno preverjanje vsebine pravnih poslov, ki so dolgoročno zavezujoči, in
- internal control systems provide for regular verification of the substance of legal transactions which are binding in the long term, and
- da notranji nadzorni sistemi poskrbijo za to, da dolgoročno zavezujoči pravni posli vsebujejo določbe, ki omogočajo ekonomsko upravičene prilagoditve;
- internal control systems make sure that legal transactions which are binding in the long term contain clauses providing scope for adjustments which make economic sense;
meni tudi, da mora notranji revizor med pregledom okvira za notranjo kontrolo preveriti, ali se ti ukrepi izvajajo pravilno;
Considers that the Internal Auditor should verify the correct implementation of these measures in his review of the internal control framework.
Uredba Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 357, 31.12.2002, str.
Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p.
Odstavek 90 zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 8. aprila 2003.
Paragraph 90 of its above-mentioned resolution of 8 April 2003. ;
55. obžaluje, da sta se leta 2004 število in obseg pogodb, dodeljenih v postopku javnih naročil, zelo zmanjšala; poziva generalnega sekretarja, da to pojasni;
Regrets the fact that, in 2004, the number and value of contracts awarded under open procedures fell considerably; calls on the Secretary-General to give reasons for this;
Odstavek 72 zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 8. aprila 2003. (zbiranje ponudb pri naročilih majhne vrednosti, elektronska izmenjava informacij o javnih razpisih), ki jih je uprava predstavila lani;
Paragraph 72 of its above-mentioned resolution of 12 April 2005. (low-value contracts awarded through competitive tendering, electronic tendering information exchange) have been taken on board;
60. opozarja, da odstavek 2.7.3 pravil o uporabi sredstev iz proračunske postavke 3701
Recalls that paragraph 2.7.3 of the Rules on the use of appropriations from budget Item 3701
(v tisoč EUR)
(in thousands of EUR)
Razpoložljiva proračunska sredstva – skupaj
Total available in budget
Zgornja meja za prenos*
Carry-forward ceiling*
Prenos v leto 2005
Carried forward to
*) V skladu z določbami o izvrševanju proračunske postavke 3701
* As per implementing provisions for budget Item 3701.
**) Dodeljena sredstva le za prvo polletje 2004
** Allocation only for the first half of 2004.
***) Sklep predsedstva z dne 29. septembra 2005
*** Bureau decision of 29 September 2005.
66. obžaluje, da so se do julija 2004 pogodbe pripravnikov in pogodbe ponudnikov storitev z neodvisnimi osebami, podjetji ali ustanovami vnašale v računalniški sistem Parlamenta z enako šifro, ne glede na vrsto pogodbe oziroma to, ali so veljale za pomočnika ali pripravnika;
Regrets that until July 2004, trainee contracts and service provider contracts with independent persons, companies or foundations were entered into the Parliament's computer system with the same code without regard for the type of contract or whether the contract referred to an assistant or a trainee;