natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– do ustreznih dodatnih informacij ali dokumentov, povezanih z zasedanji delovnih skupin institucij, in do dokumentov, predloženih s strani sekretariatov institucij (vključno s pravnimi službami), ko le-ti niso le upravne narave.
– to relevant complementary information or documents relating to the meetings of the institutions' working groups, and to the contributions submitted by the secretariats of the institutions (including the legal services), where such documents are not simply administrative in nature.
Spremenjena uredba naj bo zakonodajna podlaga za oblikovanje predpisov, dobre prakse in medinstitucionalnih sporazumov, namenjenih izboljšanju priprave zakonodajnih besedil in zagotavljanju dostopa do končnih oblik zakonodajnih besedil, kot predpisi, ki veljajo za:
The amended Regulation should also be the legal basis for establishing rules, good practice and inter-institutional agreements designed to improve the drafting of legislative texts and to ensure that final legislative texts are accessible, such as the rules to be followed for:
– pripravljanje osnutkov zakonodajnih aktov,
– drafting legislative acts,
– njihovo objavo v elektronski obliki v Uradnem listu in
– publishing them in electronic form in the Official Journal,
– združevanje osnovnih besedil in njihovih aktov o spremembah in
– consolidating basic texts with their amending acts, and
– določanje formata Uradnega lista, izvajanje večjezičnosti in opredeljevanje nalog Urada za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti;
– determining the format of the Official Journal, implementing multilingualism and defining the tasks of the OPOCE;
(b) opredeli naj " nezakonodajne dokumente" kot dokumente, povezane s postopki za izvajanje zakonodajnih aktov (ne glede na to, katera institucija je vpletena) in dokumente, povezane s postopki sprejemanja nezavezujočih aktov; glede na njihov upravni značaj, bi moralo biti mogoče zanje uveljaviti manj stroge predpise o preglednosti;
(b) by defining the concept of 'non-legislative documents' as documents linked to procedures for implementing legislative acts (whichever institutions are involved) and documents linked to procedures for adopting non-binding acts; it should be possible to apply less stringent transparency rules to such documents, given their administrative nature;
Zato bi morale institucije:
Therefore the institutions:
- omogočiti javnost postopkov, ki se jih spoštuje za nezakonodajne dokumente, in jasno opredeliti, kdaj in kako lahko zainteresirani sodelujejo v zadevnem postopku ter kdaj in kako lahko javnost dostopa do dokumentov;
– should make public the procedure to be followed for non-legislative documents and lay down clearly when and how interested parties may take part in the procedure concerned and when and how the public may have access to the documents;
- tudi jasno navesti organizacijske enote, ki so vključene v upravne postopke, načine shranjevanja dokumentov, tako začasno kot trajno, in kako do njih dostopati.
– should also clearly indicate the organisational units involved in administrative procedures, the way in which documents are stored, both temporarily and permanently, and how they can be accessed.
(c) opredli naj " regulativne dokumente"
c) by defining the concept of 'regulatory documents' (
Priporočilo 3 (o zaupnih dokumentih)
Recommendation 3 (on documents to be treated as confidential)
Ob upoštevanju najboljše prakse v državah članica bi morala biti spremenjena tudi Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 in sicer tako, da se jasno opredeli "omejitve iz razlogov javnega ali zasebnega interesa", kot jo navaja člen 255 Pogodbe ES, zaradi katerega bi bil lahko odložen ali preprečen dostop do dokumentov institucij (oziroma njihovih ustreznih delov); Uredba bi zatorej morala:
Taking into account best practice in the Member States, Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 should also be amended in such a way as to clearly define the '... limits on grounds of public or private interest', as referred to in Article 255 TEC, which could delay or prevent access to the institutions' documents (or relevant parts of them); the Regulation should therefore contain rules for:
(a) zagotoviti, da se, ne glede na področje dejavnosti EU, sklepi o temeljni politiki in zakonodaja sprejemajo javno; pojasniti je treba tudi razlike med potrebo po zaupnosti, denimo v primeru načrtovanega tekočega delovanja varnostnih služb, na eni strani ter zahtevami po odgovornosti in naknadnem nadzoru na drugi strani.
(a) ensuring that, regardless of the field of EU action, the grounds on which basic policy decisions are taken and legislation adopted are in the public domain; there is also a need for clarification of the distinction between, on the one hand, the need for confidentiality as regards, for instance, planned or on-going operations by security services and, on the other hand, the requirements of accountability and a posteriori control,
(b) zagotoviti, da se dokumentov ne bo označevalo kot zaupne povsem rutinsko, zato ker se nanašajo na vprašanje, ki je ali bi lahko bilo pomembno iz zornega kota varnosti, in
(b) ensuring that documents are not classified as confidential as a matter of routine, simply because they refer to a issue which is or might be relevant from a security point of view, and
(c) zagotoviti primeren nadzor s strani Evropskega parlamenta (demokratičen parlamentarni nadzor).
(c) ensuring adequate control by the European Parliament (democratic parliamentary scrutiny).
Uredba bi morala tudi jasno opredeliti, da dvostranski sporazumi s tretjimi državami ali mednarodnimi organizacijami ne smejo prepovedovati Svetu ali Komisiji izmenjave zaupnih informacij z Evropskim parlamentom (predvsem, ko določeni EU dokumenti niso dostopni nacionalnim parlamentom).
The Regulation should also clearly provide that bilateral agreements with third countries or international organisations may not prohibit the Council or the Commission from sharing confidential information with the European Parliament (in particular, where the relevant documents are not accessible to national parliaments, since they are EU documents).
Priporočilo 4 (o odnosu med EU in državami članicami kar zadeva izmenjavo informacij/dokumentov)
Recommendation 4 (on the relationship between the EU and Member States as regards sharing information/documents)
Upoštevajoč načelo, opisano v členu 296 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi ES, po katerem "nobena država članica ne sme biti prisiljena posredovati informacije, katerih razkritje bi bilo v nasprotju s ključnimi interesi njene varnosti" , bi bilo treba Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001 spremeniti tako, da:
Taking into account the principle outlined in Article 296 TEC according to which 'no Member State shall be obliged to supply information the disclosure of which it considers contrary to the essential interests of its security', Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 should be amended in such a way as to
(a) omeji pravico držav članic do omejevanja dostopa do njihovih prispevkov/sprememb v zakonodajnih/urejevalnih postopkih;
(a) limit the right of Member States to limit access to their contributions/amendments in legislative/regulatory procedures;
(b) omogoči popoln dostop do informacij, posredovanih Komisiji, ko le-ta izvaja ES ali EU zakonodajo, do takrat, dokler se ne sproži postopka pred Sodiščem.
(b) give full access to information submitted to the Commission when dealing with the implementation of EC or EU legislation until such time as any proceedings before a Court have begun.
Priporočilo 5 (o izvedbenih podrobnostih zagotavljanja dostopa državljanov do dokumentov)
Recommendation 5 (on the practicalities of ensuring citizens' access to documents)
Upoštevajoč izkušnje iz prvega štiriletnega obdobja Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, mora Komisija spremeniti Uredbo z jasnim predlogom, s katerim bi:
Taking into account the experience of the first four-year period of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, the Commission should amend the Regulation by making a coherent proposal for:
(a) dostop do dokumentov, ki vključujejo zakonodajne ali urejevalne postopke, zagotovila z ene same točke po jasni in strukturirani poti (glej Priporočilo 2);
(a) ensuring a single point of access in a clear and structured way to all preparatory documents dealing with a legislative or regulatory procedure (see Recommendation 2);
(b) prestrukturirala registre institucij z uporabo skupnega vmesnika, tako da so vsi trije registri za državljana/uporabnika enako funkcionalni;
(b) reorganising the institutions' registers by adding a common interface so that the citizen/user is able to find the same functionalities in the three registers;
(c) opredelila skupna pravila za arhiviranje dokumentov brez podvojevanja ter zagotovila verodostojnost različnih verzij;
(c) defining common rules for archiving documents, avoiding duplication and ensuring the authenticity of the various versions;
(d) na jasen in razumljiv način predstavila potek dela v institucijah in, kjer je to potrebno, točko dostopa do dokumentov;
(d) presenting in a clear and comprehensible way the work-flow of the institutions and, where relevant, the point of access to the documents.
člen 192(2) ES
Article 192, second paragraph, EC
člena 39 in 45
Rules 39 and 45
o vplivih sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu na razvoj
on the development impact of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs)
- ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o partnerstvu med skupino afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (AKP) ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami, podpisanega 23. junija 2000 v Cotonouju
- having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP) and the European Community and its Member States signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000
- ob upoštevanju ministrske deklaracije Afriške unije o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu, ki je bila podana na tretjem rednem zasedanju konference ministrov za trgovino AU v Kairu od 5. do 9. junija 2005 (AU/TI/MIN/DECL.
- having regard to the African Union's Ministerial Declaration on EPA Negotiations made at the 3rd Ordinary Session of the AU Conference of Ministers of Trade, Cairo, 5-9 June 2005 (AU/TI/MIN/DECL.
- ob upoštevanju Deklaracije iz Cape Towna, ki jo je sprejela Skupna parlamentarna skupščina AKP–EU 21. marca 2002 (AKP-EU/3382/02/končno)
- having regard to the Cape Town Declaration adopted by the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly on 21 March 2002 (ACP-EU/3382/02/fin)
- ob upoštevanju izjave z 81. zasedanja Sveta ministrov AKP 21 in 22. junija 2005 v Bruslju,
- having regard to the declaration of the 81st Session of the ACP Council of Ministers, Brussels, 21-22 June 2005,
- ob upoštevanju sklepne izjave Johna Kaputina na regionalnem srečanju pogajalcev AKP o sporazumih o prosti trgovini 4. oktobra 2005 v Londonu,
- having regard to Sir John Kaputin's closing statement at the ACP Regional EPA Negotiators meeting, London, 4 October 2005,
- ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta osebja Evropske komisije z naslovom "Trgovinski in razvojni vidiki pogajanj o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu" z 9. novembra 2005 ( SEC(2005)1459 ),
- having regard to the European Commission Staff Working Document entitled 'The Trade and Development Aspects of EPA Negotiations', of 9 November 2005 ( SEC(2005)1459 ),
- ob upoštevanju skupnega poročila o delu "vse države AKP–ES" pri pogajanjih o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu 2. oktobra 2003 v Bruslju (AKP/00/118/03 Rev.1, AKP-ES/NG/43),
- having regard to the Joint Report on the all-ACP-EC phase of EPA negotiations, Brussels, 2 October 2003 (ACP/00/118/03 Rev.1, ACP-EC/NG/43),
- ob upoštevanju deklaracije tisočletja Združenih narodov z 18. septembra 2000, ki določa razvojne cilje tisočletja kot merila, ki jih je za odpravo revščine skupaj začrtala mednarodna skupnost,
- having regard to the United Nations Millennium Declaration of 18 September 2000, which sets out the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as criteria established jointly by the international community for the elimination of poverty,
- ob upoštevanju izjave "Svetovni vrh ZN 2005" (tisočletje +5), ki je potekal septembra 2005
- having regard to the declaration of the 'UN 2005 World Summit' (Millennium + 5) in September 2005
- ob upoštevanju poročila Evropske komisije z 29. oktobra 2004 o razvojnih ciljih tisočletja v letih 2000–2004 ( SEC(2004)1379 ),
- having regard to the European Commission Report of 29 October 2004 on the Millennium Development Goals 2000-2004 ( SEC(2004)1379 ),
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru z 12. aprila 2005: "Pospeševanje napredka v smeri uresničevanja razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja – Prispevek Evropske unije" ( KOM(2005)0132 ),
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee of 12 April 2005: “Speeding up progress towards the Millennium Development Goals - The European Union’s contribution” ( COM(2005)0132 ),
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij s 13. julija 2005, ki nosi naslov "Predlog skupne izjave Sveta, Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije o razvojni politiki Evropske unije – Evropsko soglasje" ( KOM(2005)0311 ),
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 13 July 2005 entitled “Proposal for a Joint Declaration by the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on the European Union Development Policy – “The European Consensus” ( COM(2005)0311 ),
- ob upoštevanju gospodarskega poročila o Afriki za leto 2004, ki ga je pod naslovom "Sprostitev trgovinskega potenciala Afrike" izdala ekonomska komisija ZN za Afriko,
- having regard to the Economic Report on Africa 2004 entitled “Unlocking Africa’s Trade Potential” by the UN Economic Commission for Africa,
- ob upoštevanju poročila osebnih predstavnikov G8 za Afriko o napredku pri izvajanju akcijskega načrta za Afriko, ki ga je 1. julija 2005 objavila skupina G8 v Londonu,
- having regard to the Progress Report by the G8 Africa Personal Representatives on implementation of the Africa Action Plan, released on 1 July 2005 by the Group of Eight in London,
- ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za splošne zadeve s 23. in 24. maja 2005,
- having regard to the Conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 23-24 May 2005,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj (A6-0000/2006),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Development ( A6-0053/2006 ),
A. ker so med letoma 1975 in 2000 trgovinske odnose med EU in državami AKP urejale konvencije iz Loméja, ki so državam AKP zagotavljale enostranski in prednostni dostop do trga EU,
A. whereas between 1975 and 2000 the EU's trade relationship with the ACP countries was governed by the Lomé Conventions which granted ACP countries non-reciprocal and preferential access to the EU market,
B. ker se je s podpisom Sporazuma iz Cotonouja leta 2000 začelo novo obdobje v odnosih med AKP in EU, vključno s pogoji v novih trgovinskih odnosih,
B. whereas the signing of the Cotonou Agreement in 2000 ushered in a fresh era of ACP-EU relations, including provisions for a new trade relationship,
C. ker je poglavitni cilj partnerstva AKP–EU in Sporazuma iz Cotonouja izboljšanje obetov socialnega in gospodarskega razvoja držav AKP,
C. whereas the primary objective of the ACP-EU partnership and the Cotonou Agreement is to improve the social and economic development prospects of the ACP countries;
D. ker je EU še naprej zavezana razvojnim ciljem tisočletja, ki bi morali biti le prvi korak na poti k izkoreninjenju revščine,
D. whereas the EU remains committed to the MDGs, these should only be seen as the first step in the eradication of poverty;
E. ker so cilji Sporazuma iz Cotonouja in EU jasni, vendar ob upoštevanju pričakovanega učinka sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu, ki trenutno slonijo na krhkih gospodarstvih AKP in različnih ravneh razvoja med gospodarstvi EU in AKP, številni udeleženci vse bolj dvomijo v uresničitev teh ciljev; med njimi so afriški ministri, nekatere države članice EU, evropska civilna družba ter civilna družba v državah v razvoju,
E. whereas the goals of the Cotonou Agreement and the EU are clear, yet considering the expected impact of the EPAs as they stand at present on fragile ACP economies and the different levels of development between the EU and ACP economies, the EPAs' role in achieving these goals has been increasingly questioned by various players, including African Ministers, some EU Member States and European and civil society in the developing world,
F. ker integracijo trga v EU spremljajo kohezijski ukrepi za podporo gospodarsko šibkejšim državam,
F. whereas market integration within the EU has been accompanied by cohesion measures in support of economically weaker countries,
G. ker Sporazum iz Cotonouja poudarja potrebo po nadaljevanju pobud za regionalno povezovanje držav AKP, saj bosta oblikovanje širših regionalnih trgov in tesnejše regionalno povezovanje spodbudila trgovce in vlagatelje,
G. whereas the Cotonou Agreement underlines the need to build on the regional integration initiatives of ACP States, as the creation of larger regional markets and deeper regional integration will act as an incentive for traders and investors,
H. ker Sporazum iz Cotonouja določa dogovor strani, da sklenejo nove trgovinske sporazume v skladu z STO, postopno odstranijo ovire v trgovini med njimi ter okrepijo sodelovanje na vseh področjih, povezanih s trgovino,
H. whereas the Cotonou Agreement sets out the Parties’ agreement to conclude new WTO-compatible trading arrangements, progressively removing barriers to trade between them and enhancing co-operation in all areas relevant to trade,
I. ker obstoječe trgovinske ureditve (priloga V Sporazuma iz Cotonouja „Trgovinska ureditev za uporabo v pripravljalnem obdobju iz člena 37(1)”) ureja posebna oprostitev STO, ki bo prenehala veljati konec leta 2007,
I. whereas the existing trade arrangements (Annex V to the Cotonou Agreement “Trade Regime applicable during the Preparatory Period referred to in Article 37(1)”) are covered by a WTO waiver that is due to expire at the end of 2007,
J. ker naj bi sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu določili nove trgovinske odnose med državami članicami EU in državami AKP, vendar se je v zgodovini izkazalo, da je liberalizacija trgovine med neenakovrednimi partnerji kot orodje razvoja neučinkovita in ima celo nasprotni učinek,
J. whereas EPAs are supposed to define new trade relationships between EU Member States and ACP countries, yet liberalising trade between unequal partners as a tool for development has historically proven to be ineffective and even counterproductive,
K. ker je regionalni vidik sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu nujen za okrepitev tako trgovanja sever–jug kot trgovanja jug–jug,
K. whereas the regional aspect of the EPAs is essential in strengthening not only North-South trade, but also South-South trade,
L. ker so najmanj razvite države AKP dobila dostop do trgov EU v okviru "Vse razen orožja (EBA)",
L. whereas ACP Least Developed Countries (LDCs) have been granted market access to the EU under 'Everything But Arms' (EBA),
M. ker člen 19 Sporazuma iz Cotonouja omogoča, da se okvir za sodelovanje AKP–EU prilagaja razmeram posameznih držav AKP,
M. whereas Article 19 of the Cotonou Agreement allows the ACP-EU cooperation framework to be tailored to the individual circumstances of each ACP country,
N. ker so se v sklepih Sveta novembra 2005 države članice dogovorile, da je treba vzpostaviti in izvajati izboljšane nadzorne mehanizme za ugotavljanje napredka pri uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev v procesu sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu,
N. whereas in the Conclusions of the November 2005 European Council , the EU Member States agreed on the need to establish and implement an improved monitoring mechanism to measure progress towards development objectives within the EPA process,
O. ker imajo na podlagi člena 37(6) Sporazuma iz Cotonouja države AKP pravico proučiti možnosti drugačnih rešitev za sporazume o gospodarskem partnerstvu,
O. whereas under Article 37(6) of the Cotonou Agreement, ACP countries have the right to explore alternatives to EPAs,
P. ker pogajanja o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu potekajo že štiri leta, vendar očitno ostaja še veliko ovir, če naj bi se pogajanja zaključila 31. decembra 2007, kot je predvideno v Sporazumu iz Cotonouja; ker XXIV. člen Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini zahteva načrt in časovni razpored za oblikovanje območja proste trgovine "v razumnem času",
P. whereas the EPA negotiations are currently in their fourth year, however it seems many hurdles remain if the negotiations are to be concluded by 31 December 2007 as provided for in the Cotonou Agreement ; whereas Article XXIV of GATT requires a plan and a schedule for completion of a free-trade area "within a reasonable length of time",
7. vendar ugotavlja, da dosedanja pogajanja niso dala za razvoj spodbudnih rezultatov, kar se kaže v vse večji zaskrbljenosti in nezadovoljstvu držav AKP zaradi neizvajanja ukrepov razvojne pomoči, potrebnih za uživanje dejanskih koristi iz sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu, kot so trdne obveze za razvojno sodelovanje, dejanski prilagoditveni ukrepi za odpravo posledic opustitve preferencialov, prenos tehnologij in večja konkurenčnost;
Notes, however, the lack of a concrete development-friendly result so far in the negotiations, as demonstrated by the increasing concern and dissatisfaction of ACP countries with regard to the failure to deliver the development support measures required for achieving concrete benefits from an EPA, such as binding commitments on development cooperation, concrete adjustment measures to overcome the effects of preference erosion, technology transfer and improved competitiveness;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj ravna v skladu s cotonoujskim ciljem za odpravo revščine in podpre družbeni in gospodarski razvoj vsake regionalne skupine, zlasti gospodarsko šibkejših držav v vsaki skupini, ki bi bile sicer lahko zapostavljene, ter sprejme potrebo po večji prožnosti – pri časovnem razporedu za pogajanja o postopni sprostitvi trgovine, trajanju prehodnega obdobja in deležu zajetih proizvodov – če naj bo celotni rezultat sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu trajnostni razvoj; poudarja, naj sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu pomagajo državam AKP pri vključevanju v svetovno gospodarstvo, in sicer s spodbujanjem razvoja prek trgovine in z upoštevanjem asimetrije njihovih gospodarstev;
Urges the Commission to act in accordance with the Cotonou objective of poverty eradication and to support the social and economic development of each regional grouping, and in particular the economically weaker countries in each grouping who might otherwise be marginalised, and to accept the necessity of greater flexibility - in terms of the timetable for negotiations regarding progressive trade opening, the length of the transition period and the degree of product coverage - if long-term sustainable development is to be the overall outcome of the EPAs; stresses that EPAs should help ACP countries to integrate in the global economy, by stimulating development through trade and taking into consideration the asymmetry of their economies;
11. poudarja pomen javnih storitev za razvoj in demokracijo, zato poziva Komisijo k previdnemu ravnanju pri načrtovanju liberalizacije področij storitev, zlasti k zaščiti vode, zdravja, izobraževanja, prevoza in energije pred liberalizacijo;
Stresses the importance of public services for development and democracy and consequently asks the Commission to act with caution when considering the liberalisation of service sectors, and in particular to protect water, health, education, transport and energy from liberalisation;