natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
N. ker so v členih 61(2) in 67 sporazum iz Cotonouja jasno določeni pogoji upravičenosti države prejemnice do proračunske pomoči, med katerimi so izrecno zahtevani izpolnjevanje standardov upravljanja javnih izdatkov, makroekonomske in sektorskih politik ter javnih naročilih, poleg tega pa morajo donatorji in države prejemnice zagotoviti, da je prilagoditev gospodarsko izvedljiva ter družbeno in politično sprejemljiva,
N. whereas Articles 61(2) and 67 of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement clearly determine the conditions governing the eligibility of a recipient country for budget support, expressly stating the need for standards regarding public expenditure management, macro-economic and sectoral policies and public procurement and, furthermore, requiring the donor and recipient to ensure that adjustment is economically viable and socially and politically workable,
O. ker je delujoča parlamentarna demokracija, v kateri se spoštujejo temeljne svoboščine in človekove pravice, vključno s političnim pluralizmom in učinkovitim sistemom upravljanja javnih financ, predhodni pogoj za proračunsko pomoč, ki bi jo bilo treba ovrednotiti glede na stopnjo odgovornega vodenja države, nadzor s strani demokratično izvoljenega parlamenta, pravno državo, odgovornost vlade, pristojnosti, dobro opredeljeno makroekonomsko, razvojno in sektorsko politiko ter stopnjo odprtosti in preglednosti javnih naročil,
O. whereas a functioning parliamentary democracy respecting fundamental freedoms and human rights, including political pluralism, and an effective public financial management system are prerequisites for budget support, and should be assessed in terms of the extent to which the recipient country is characterised by good governance, scrutiny by a democratically elected parliament, the rule of law, government accountability, competence, well-defined macro-economic, developmental and sectoral policies and the degree of openness and transparency of its public procurement,
P. ker je prvi pogoj za proračunsko pomoč učinkovit sistem upravljanja javnih financ, ki ga bi bilo treba oceniti glede na stopnjo dobrega upravljanja, odgovornosti, pristojnosti, dobro opredeljeno makroekonomsko, razvojno in sektorsko politiko ter stopnjo odprtosti in preglednosti njegovih javnih naročil,
P. whereas an effective public financial management system is a prerequisite for budget support, and should be assessed in terms of the extent to which the recipient country is characterised by good governance, accountability, competence, well-defined macro-economic, developmental and sectoral policies and the degree of openness and transparency of its public procurement,
Q. ker je treba tveganje oceniti glede na sposobnost zadevnih državnih organov, da upravljajo in uporablja finančna sredstva, glede na dobro upravljanje, zavezanost načelom razvoja, prisotnosti korupcije, glede na demokracijo in človekove pravice,
Q. whereas risk should be measured in terms of the ability of the state bodies concerned to administer and implement funds, good governance, commitment to development principles, the incidence of corruption, democracy and human rights,
R. ker so učinkovito upravljanje javnih financ in proračunski sistemi, namenjeni vzpostavljanju stabilnega makroekonomskega okolja, bistven pogoj razvoja,
R. whereas effective public financial management and budgetary systems aimed at creating a stable macro-economic climate are essential preconditions for development,
S. ker ima veliko partnerskih držav, ki prejemajo proračunsko podporo, zlasti države AKP, izjemno slabe sisteme upravljanja javnih financ,
S. whereas a number of budget support partner countries, especially in the ACP states, have extremely poor public financial management systems,
T. ker morajo donatorji in države prejemnice v okviru partnerstva skupaj učinkovito analizirati dosežke pri izvajanju razvojne politike in reform, ki so ključne za oceno izvedljivosti proračunske podpore,
T. whereas the donor-recipient partnership needs to ensure an effective joint analysis of the results of development policy implementation and reforms which are crucial to assessment of the viability of budget support,
2. poudarja, da je proračunska pomoč kot oblika pomoči lahko uspešna samo, če oba partnerja v celoti prevzameta odgovornosti v pravem duhu partnerstva in lastništva;
Stresses that budget support as an aid modality can be successful only if both partners fully assume their responsibilities in a true spirit of partnership and ownership;
4. poudarja pomen krepitve zmogljivosti vlad držav prejemnic, ki morajo prevzeti odločnejše vodstvo pri usklajevanju razvojne pomoči;
Stresses the importance of capacity-building by recipient governments, which have to assume a stronger leadership role in development assistance coordination;
11. priznava, da lahko v posamezni državi obstaja le en program makroekonomskih reform, ki ga običajno usmerjajo mednarodne finančne ustanove, vendar si morajo Komisija in države članice prizadevati za dejavno vlogo pri poskusu vplivanja na politiko v zvezi s tem programom;
Recognises that there can only be one macro-economic reform programme in any given country, which is usually directed by the international financial institutions, but in relation to which the Commission and Member States should seek to play an active role in an effort to influence policy;
26. poziva Komisijo, da mora pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru in spremljanju preprečiti z uvedbo zunanjega nadzora nad proračunsko pomočjo (na primer preko Računskega sodišča); Komisijo je treba spodbuditi, da skupaj z drugimi velikimi donatorji sprejme pobudo za vzpostavitev skupne nadzorne institucije;
Calls on the Commission to tackle the shortcomings in control and supervision by introducing an external control for budget aid (for example via the Court of Auditors); the Commission should be encouraged to take the initiative of setting up a joint supervisory institution together with the other large financial donors;
28. poziva Komisijo, da obrazloži, kako se lahko proračunska pomoč časovno omeji. ugotavlja, da mora biti končni cilj proračunske pomoči krepitev samozadostnosti držav prejemnic, zato naj Komisija navede, v kakšnem časovnem obdobju je ta cilj mogoče doseči;
Calls on the Commission to state how budget aid can be limited in time; notes that the ultimate aim of budget support must be to build up the self-sufficiency of the beneficiary country, so the Commission should state over what (reasonable) timescale this can be achieved;
Proračunska podpora je postala od konca 90. let pomembna oblika razvojne pomoči EU.
Budget support has become a prominent form of EU development assistance since the late 1990s.
Komisija jo priznava kot bistven instrument razvojne politike Evropske skupnosti.
It is recognised by the Commission as an essential instrument of European Community development policy.
Vzrok za njeno vedno večjo priljubljenost je mednarodno prizadevanje za izboljšanje učinkovitosti pomoči ob upoštevanju zavezanosti doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja.
Its growth in popularity as a development modality has taken place as part of a major international effort to improve the effectiveness of aid, in light of the commitments made towards the achievement of the MDGs.
Podpora je v skladu s prizadevanjem Evropske skupnosti za razvoj pristopa, ki bo podpiral širše gospodarske reforme, osredotočene na globlje strukturne in sektorske reforme, usmerjene v zmanjševanje revščine, podporo trdnemu upravljanju javnega financiranja, podporo davčnim reformam in podporo rasti javnega sektorja.
It is in line with the EC's committed move towards a development approach in support of wider economic reforms concentrating on deeper structural and sectoral reforms focusing on poverty reduction, support for sound public finance management, support for fiscal reforms and support for private sector growth.
Če so izpolnjeni ustrezni pogoji, je lahko proračunska podpora učinkovito orodje pri doseganju ciljev razvojne pomoči Evropske skupnosti, in sicer trajnostnega gospodarskega in socialnega razvoja, tekočega in postopnega vključevanja držav v razvoju v svetovno gospodarstvo, boja proti revščini, gospodarske rasti in rasti zaposlovanja ter razvoja in okrepitve demokracije.
Budget support, where the right conditions exist, can become a powerful tool in the achievement of European Union goals of development assistance, namely sustainable economic and social development, the smooth and gradual integration of developing countries into the world economy, the campaign against poverty, economic and employment growth and developing and consolidating democracy.
Usklajevanje donatorjev in lastništvo držav prejemnic sta pomembna faktorja sedanjega prizadevanja za učinkovitejšo pomoč, ki sta hkrati temeljni vrsti filozofije proračunske podpore.
Donor coordination and recipient ownership are the two major features in the current drive to make aid more effective; which are the two fundamental underlying philosophies of budget support.
Donatorji se usklajujejo z oblikovanjem partnerstev za proračunsko podporo, ker ta že po svoji naravi zahteva usklajeno delovanje donatorjev.
Donors coordinate by forming budget support partnerships, as by its very nature budget support requires coordinated donor action.
Usklajevanje donatorjev in usklajevanje zahtev za poročanje, izplačil pomoči, pogojenosti in tehnične pomoči povečujejo učinkovitost pomoči: z zmanjševanjem stroškov transakcije, manjšimi obremenitvami za države prejemnice, ustvarjanjem sinergije in združevanjem sredstev pomoči.
Donor coordination and harmonisation of reporting requirements, aid disbursement, conditionality and technical assistance all enhance aid effectiveness by; cutting transaction costs, reducing recipient burdens, creating synergies and aggregating aid resources.
Finančna sredstva, ki jih zagotavlja proračunska podpora, se izplačujejo prek vladnega sistema finančnega upravljanja v državi prejemnici in so lahko nenamenska – splošna proračunska podpora – ali namenjena določeni rabi – sektorska proračunska podpora.
Funds that are provided through budget support are disbursed through the recipient government's own financial management system and is either non-earmarked, General Budget Support (GBS), or earmarked for specific use, Sector Budget Support (SBS).
Država prejemnica tako prevzame popoln nadzor in odgovornost nad zagotovljenimi finančnimi sredstvi.
The recipient thus assumes full control and responsibility over the funds provided.
Učinkovitost in trajnost razvoja, ki ga vodijo države prejemnice, tako ni sporna.
The effectiveness and sustainability of recipient led development is indisputable.
Splošno proračunsko podporo spremljajo skupni sporazumi, ki zadevajo razvojno strategijo vlade, ki je običajno v obliki dokumentov o strategiji za zmanjševanje revščine, ter nujne reforme na področju upravljanja in gospodarstva.
General budget support is accompanied by joint agreements concerning the government's development strategy, usually in the form of a PRSP, and upon necessary governance and economic reforms.
Namesto da se vlade osredotočijo le na uporabo sredstev pomoči, morajo skupaj z donatorji spremljati izvajanje strategije, o kateri so se dogovorile, kar preprečuje težavo zamenljivosti pomoči.
Instead of focusing only on the use of aid funds, recipient governments and donors jointly monitor the implementation of the agreed strategy as a whole, which counteracts the problem of aid fungibility.
Dokumenti o strategiji za zmanjševanje revščine določajo vsebinski razvoj prednostnih nalog na način, ki je čim bolj v lasti države prejemnice.
The PRSP determines the substantive development priorities through a means which is as much as possible recipient-owned.
Pristopi na sektorski ravni, zlasti v socialnih sektorjih, kot sta zdravje in izobraževanje, se pogosto uporabljajo za večjo usmeritev in opredelitev prednostnih nalog razvoja v teh sektorjih.
Sector wide approaches, in priority social sectors, such as health and education are also commonly used, to give more focus and articulation to the development priorities in these sectors.
Zagovorniki proračunske podpore poudarjajo, da bo instrument povzročil različna pozitivna pričakovanja, ki vključujejo: izboljšano usklajenost in skladnost med donatorji (večjo učinkovitost in večje zneske pomoči ter uskladitev pogojenosti), približevanje sistemom in politiki v partnerskih državah, večjo predvidljivost financiranja, večje lastništvo držav prejemnic (ker država prejemnica določa in nato izvaja razvojno politiko), izboljšanje sistema upravljanja javnega financiranja v zvezi z dobrim upravljanjem, makroekonomsko stabilnostjo in učinkovitim razporejanjem ter izboljšano domačo odgovornost.
The advocates of budget support point to a wide range of positive expectations from the instrument, which include; improved coordination and harmonisation among donors (increasing efficiencies and aid amounts and harmonising conditionality), alignment to partner country systems and policies, greater predictability of funding, increased recipient ownership (as the recipient determines and then implements development policies), improvements in public financial management systems, in terms of good governance, macroeconomic stability and allocative efficiency, and improved domestic accountability.
Ti teoretični pozitivni rezultati so resnično obetajoči, vendar obstaja v nekaterih primerih še veliko pridržkov glede učinkovitosti instrumenta.
These theoretical positive outcomes are indeed considerable but major reservations can also be placed against the efficacy of the instrument in some cases.
Ustreznost uporabe instrumenta v občutljivih državah ali državah, v katerih ni javnih struktur, zlasti zmožnosti za upravljanje javnega financiranja, ki bi uspešno vodile instrument, ali v državah, v katerih vlada nedemokratičnost, korupcija ali resno kršenje človekovih pravic, je zelo sporna.
The appropriateness of the use of the instrument in fragile states, or states that lack the public structures and in particular the public financial management capabilities to manage the instrument effectively, or in states that are undemocratic, corrupt, or serious violators of human rights, is very controversial.
Bistveni pogoji
Essential conditions
Pozitivno okolje
Positive environment
Uspeh proračunske podpore po svoji naravi zahteva, da donator in država partnerica razmišljata enako.
The success of Budget Support by its very nature requires the donor and the recipient partner to be of like mind.
Brez skupnega prizadevanja za prednostne naloge razvoja in sredstev za njihovo doseganje partnerstvo ne more prinesti biti koristno.
Without a shared commitment to development priorities and to the means to achieve them there can be no benefit derived from the partnership.
Proračunska podpora je odvisna od tega, kako vodi postopek država prejemnica.
Budget support is dependent upon the leadership of the recipient state throughout the process.
Zato je treba jasno določiti, da je država prejemnica v celoti zavezana voditi postopek razvoja.
For this reason it should be clearly established that the recipient state is fully committed to leading the development process.
Postopek sodelovanja, ki razvršča in določa prednostne cilje razvoja prek postopka za dokumente o strategiji za zmanjšanje revščine, ki ga vodi vlada, in zavezanost države institucionalni reformi, sta običajno podlaga sporazuma o proračunski podpori.
A participatory process that categorises and prioritises development objectives through a government led PRSP process, along with state institutional reform commitments, is normally the basis of the budget support agreement.
Dokumenti o strategiji za zmanjšanje revščine in zavezanost države institucionalni reformi so tako temelj razvojnega ukrepa; ukrep, ki se sprejme zaradi doseganja teh ciljev, zahteva stalno vrednotenje, zato da se opredelijo resnična zavezanost, uspeh in uporabnost proračunske podpore kot orodja v postopku razvoja.
The PRSP and state institutional reform commitments thus form the basis of development action; the action taken to achieve these objectives constantly requires evaluation to determine the real commitment, the success and the practicality of using budget support as a tool in the development process.
Uporabnost in oblika
Practicality and form
Uporabnost proračunske podpore je temeljna, kar pomeni, da obstajajo upravičena pričakovanja, da bosta njena oblika in uporaba dosegli želene rezultate.
The practicality of budget support use is fundamental, meaning that there should be a legitimate expectation that its form and application will result in the desired outcome.
Ključni vidik za odločanje o uporabi proračunske podpore in njeni optimalni obliki je koncept „zunanje finančne vrzeli“ z več merili, ki upoštevajo rast in razvojne možnosti, stopnjo lakote, dobro upravljanje, delovanju v preteklosti in zavezanost razvoju.
The key considerations to decide on budget support application and its optimum form, is the concept of the 'external financing gap', along with a number of criteria taking into account growth and development possibilities, the degree of poverty, good governance, past performances and development commitment.
Evropska komisija in države članice morajo v celoti upoštevati vidike, ki lahko omejijo uspeh postopka razvoja in jih države prejemnice ne morejo spremeniti ter vključujejo zlasti: svetovne neenakosti na področju trgovine, gospodarski in tehnični kapital, intelektualno lastnino, vire energije in naravne nesreče.
The European Commission and member states should fully take into account considerations, that may limit the success of the development process and which are outside the recipient state's power to change, which include in particular; global inequities in trade, economic and technical capital, intellectual property, access to energy sources and natural disasters.
Upravljanje fiduciarnega tveganja v postopku proračunske podpore je bistveno.
The management of fiduciary risk in the budget support process is of fundamental importance.
Tveganje je lahko gospodarsko, finančno ali politično.
Risk may be economic, financial or political.
Nujni pogoji za varovanje donatorskih sredstev morajo biti bistven pogoj za uporabo proračunske podpore.
The necessary conditions to safeguard donor funds should be essential preconditions to the use of budget support.
Okvir za ocenjevanje uspešnosti, ki je bil vzpostavljen s programom javnih financ in finančne odgovornosti (PEFA), je treba uporabiti kot vzorec za ocenjevanje tveganja upravljanja javnega financiranja.
The performance measurement framework set out by the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Programme (PEFA) should be used as a model in the assessment of public financial management risk.
Jasni minimalni standardi dobrega upravljanja, preglednosti in pojava korupcije morajo biti izpolnjeni, preden se začne obravnavati možnost proračunske podpore.
Explicit minimum standards of good governance, transparency and incidence of corruption should be satisfied before budget support can be considered.
Razen tega se lahko razmere v državi, ki izpolnjuje vstopne pogoje, potrebne za začetek izvajanja programa proračunske podpore, poslabšajo, zato je treba pogoje upravičenosti in ustreznosti instrumenta stalno ocenjevati.
Moreover the country situation that satisfies the entry conditions necessary to begin a budget support programme may deteriorate, so the conditions of eligibility and appropriateness of the instrument need to be constantly reassessed.
Malavi je zelo sporen primer, v katerem se je proračunska podpora uporabljala, čeprav je bilo tveganje splošno znano.
Malawi is a very worrying case, where budget support was used despite the full knowledge of the inherent risks involved.
Ocena tveganja uporabe proračunske podpore v Malaviju je bila preveč optimistična glede na slabo izvajanje politike in šibko davčno disciplino malavijske vlade.
An overly optimistic assessment was made of the risk of using budget support in Malawi in light of a history of poor policy implementation and weak fiscal discipline by the Malawian Government.
Posledica te neprimerne ocene vseh vrst tveganja, povezanih z uporabo proračunske podpore, je bilo nesmiselno zapravljanje finančnih sredstev za razvoj, kar zbuja dvom o sposobnosti Evropske komisije, da učinkovito uporabi instrument proračunske podpore.
As a result of this inadequate assessment of all risks involved in the use of budget support, development funds were squandered, which raises some serious questions about the EC's competency in using the budget support instrument effectively.
Donatorska podpora
Donor support
Donatorska podpora je bistvena za učinkovitost instrumenta.
Donor support is essential to the instruments effectiveness.
Donatorji so odgovorni za učinkovito uporabo sredstev pomoči.
The donors hold the responsibility over the effective use of aid funds.
Donatorji morajo zagotoviti, da uporaba proračunske podpore ustreza doseganju razvojnih ciljev.
It is the donors' obligation to see to it that the use of budget support is appropriate to the achievement of development goals.
Donatorji morajo v skladu z jasno določenimi pogoji upravičenosti in stopnjo pričakovanja pozitivnih rezultatov v celoti oceniti, ali je država primerna za proračunsko podporo.
The donors should competently assess the appropriateness of a country to budget support, in line with the clear eligibility requirements and the degree of expectation for a positive result.
Uporaba političnega dialoga je pomembno orodje, ki vpliva na postopek razvoja, in se oblikuje skupaj z državo prejemnico.
The use of policy dialogue is an important tool to influence or shape the development process along with the recipient.
Učinkovitost upravljanja instrumenta je ključna, ker je veliko odvisno od usposobljenosti donatorjev glede odločitve, katera oblika podpore je najbolj primerna za posamezno državo prejemnico, zagotavljanja podpore, da se pospešijo rezultati (nujno je zagotavljanje potrebne tehnične podpore), in nujne meritve rezultatov instrumenta v različnih kontekstih ter možnosti te rezultate razložiti.
The effectiveness of the administration of the instrument is critical, as a lot depends on the donors' competency, in terms of deciding what form the support should take for each recipient partner, the effective provision of that support so the results are facilitated (such as providing the necessary technical support which is crucial) and the necessary measurement of the results of the instrument in different contexts, and to be able to interpret these results.
Razen tega je treba tudi upoštevati, da čeprav so donatorska partnerstva nujna in so resnično izboljšanje učinkovitosti pomoči, lahko okrepitev pooblastil donatorjem oslabi državo prejemnico v partnerstvu za proračunsko podporo, s čimer lahko koncept lastništva postane le iluzija.
It should also be kept in mind that while donor partnerships are necessary and present very real improvements to the effectiveness of aid, the consolidation of donor power, may reduce the strength of the recipient in the budget support partnership making the concept of ownership a mere illusion.
Učinkovitost pomoči za boj proti revščini
Aid effectiveness for combating of poverty
Proračunska podpora je razvoj makroekonomske podpore in instrument se zlasti osredotoča na makroekonomske vidike, ker sta stabilno makroekonomsko okolje in učinkovit proračunski sistem bistvena pogoja za razvoj.
Budget support is an evolution of macro economic support, and to a large extent the instrument focuses on macro economic considerations as a stable macro economic environment and effective budgetary system are essential preconditions for development.
Te pogoje je treba obravnavati kot temelj za doseganje razvojnih ciljev.
These preconditions should be seen as the foundation for meeting development objectives.
Pripravljenost in sposobnost izvajanja politike, katere cilj je doseči prednostne naloge razvoja, sta naslednja koraka.
The willingness and ability to implement policies that aim to achieve development priorities are the next steps.
Zato morajo obstajati visoka pričakovanja, da bodo javni izdatki za prednostne naloge razvoja dosegli pozitivne rezultati.
There should be a high expectation that public expenditure for development priorities will reap positive results.