natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
M. ker so torej nacionalne ter evropske politične in športne oblasti z oblikovanjem ustreznega pravnega okvira dolžne zagotoviti, da uporaba prava Skupnosti za evropski nogomet ne ogrozi njegovega družbenega in kulturnega vloge,
M. whereas it is thus the responsibility of the national and European political and sporting authorities to ensure that, when Community law is applied to professional football, this does not compromise its social and cultural purposes, by developing an appropriate legal framework,
N. ker Pogodba ne predvideva izjem za poklicni nogomet, vendar predpisi v športu, ki so neločljivo povezani z organizacijo in pravilen potek športnega tekmovanja ter torej zagotavljajo prosto konkurenco med klubi, ne spadajo v zakonodajo ES, in ker pogodbi iz Nice in iz Amsterdama priznavata posebno naravo športa in njegove družbene funkcije,
N. whereas the Treaty provides no exemption for professional football, but whereas sports regulations that are inseparably associated with the organisation and orderly conduct of a sporting competition, and thus serve to ensure a free contest between the clubs, are not subject to the EC’s legal framework and whereas the declarations of Nice and Amsterdam recognise the specific nature of sport and its social functions,
O. ker je iz omenjenih in drugih primerov v praksi razvidno, da poklicni nogomet urejajo različne oblike zakonodaje na različnih ravneh in iz različnih virov, ki se pogosto izključujejo in si nasprotujejo,
O. whereas it has emerged from the above-mentioned cases and others that, in practice, professional football is affected by different kinds of legislation at different levels and from different sources, which are often contradictory and conflicting,
P. ker hazardiranje in stave ne spadajo v okvir Direktive 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z 12. decembra 2006 o storitvah na mednarodnem trgu
P. whereas gaming and betting do not come within the scope of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market
1. ugotavlja, da poklicni nogomet ni samo glavni družbeni in kulturni pojav v Evropi, ampak tudi vir znatnega dohodka za majhno število klubov na vrhu piramidne strukture tega športa;
Notes that professional football is not just a major social and cultural phenomenon in Europe but also a source of substantial revenue for a small minority of clubs at the top of the sport’s pyramid structure;
5. ugotavlja, da so pravila vodstvenih organov, ki veljajo za poklicni nogomet, lahko zajeta v področje uporabe Pogodbe ali pa ne in da jih je mogoče s Pogodbo upravičiti ali prepovedati;
Notes that the rules of the governing bodies applicable to professional football may fall either outside or within the scope of the Treaty, and may be capable of justification under, or be prohibited by, the Treaty;
7. meni, da mora Komisija, preden se oblikuje in spodbudi pravna stabilnost, zagotoviti smernice o obstoječem pravnem okviru, ki se uporablja za poklicni nogomet;
Believes that, before legal stability can be created and promoted, guidance is needed from the Commission on the current legal framework as it applies to professional football;
10. opaža, da so trenutno največje težave poklicnega nogometa vznemirjajoče število nepravilnosti v nekaterih klubih, korupcija sodnikov ali igralcev in sum pranja denarja; priporoča, da nacionalne in evropske političnih in športne oblasti organizirajo učinkovito kampanjo, s katero bodo zagotovile večjo preglednost in dobro upravljanje evropskega poklicnega nogometa;
Notes that the most urgent issues currently affecting professional football concern the disturbing proliferation of cases of maladministration of certain clubs, corruption of referees or players and suspected money-laundering; recommends a vigorous campaign by the national and European political and sports authorities to establish greater transparency and good governance in European professional football;
11. priznava, da je splošno organizacijo in pravila poklicnega nogometa bolje prepustiti nogometnim oblastem ter da bi EU morala ukrepati le po potrebi;
11. , Recognises at all times that matters concerning the general organisation and rules of professional football are best left to the football authorities and that action on the part of the EU should only be taken where necessary;
15. poudarja, kako pomembno je vzajemno priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij, pridobljenih v drugi državi članici, pri omogočanju svobodnega pretoka delavcev in svobode zagotavljanja storitev v EU, kot določa Pogodba;
Emphasises the importance of the mutual recognition of professional qualifications gained in another Member State in allowing the free movement of workers and freedom to provide services within the EU as enshrined in the Treaty;
19. poziva organizaciji UEFA in FIFA, naj natančno preučita svoja pravila in predpise, da ugotovita, ali je bilo soglasje o njih doseženo na pregleden in demokratičen način ter ali so dejansko nujni in ustrezni za doseganje pravno utemeljenih ciljev, za katere si prizadevajo; priporoča, da nogometne zveze zagotovijo zavarovanje za igralce, ko ti igrajo v nacionalni ekipi;
Calls on UEFA and FIFA to scrutinise their rules and regulations carefully in order to determine whether they have been transparently and democratically agreed and are truly necessary and proportionate for the achievement of the legitimate objectives they seek to pursue; recommends that the football associations provide insurance for the players while they are playing in the national team;
(a) da se sektor kot celota izvzame iz področja uporabe Pogodbe;
(a) to exclude the sector en bloc from the scope of the Treaty;
(b) da se ne ukrepa in se dopusti, da Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti z sodbami, neugodnimi za igro, oblikuje prihodnost evropskega poklicnega nogometa;
(b) to do nothing and let the ECJ shape the future of European professional football by judgments adverse to the game;
26. zato poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi smernice za reševanje nerešenih vprašanj znotraj zakonodajnega in gospodarskega okvira poklicnega nogometa, obenem pa vedno priznava, da je splošno organizacijo in pravila poklicnega nogometa bolje prepustiti nogometnim oblastem ter da bi EU morala ukrepati le po potrebi.
Therefore calls on the Commission to come forward with guidance to address the unresolved issues within the legal and economic framework of professional football, while recognising at all times that matters concerning the general organisation and rules of professional football are best left to the football authorities and that action on the part of the EU should only be taken where necessary.
Prihodnost poklicnega nogometa v Evropi
The future of Professional Football in the EU
MNENJE Odbor za pravne zadeve
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za kulturo in izobraževanje, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Culture and Education, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. veljavna primarna zakonodaja Evropski skupnosti ne daje pristojnosti za šport na splošno niti posebej za poklicni nogomet, vendar tudi nista izvzeta iz področja uporabe; med drugim je tudi iz sodne prakse Sodišča evropskih skupnosti (Sodišča) in odločitev Komisije razvidno, da zlasti prepoved diskriminacije iz člena 12 Pogodbe o ES, pravica delavcev do mobilnosti iz člena 39 Pogodbe, pravica do ustanavljanja podjetij in nudenja storitev iz členov 43 in 49 , določbe o konkurenci iz členov 81 do 87 ter določbe o zaposlovanju in socialni politiki vplivajo na šport in na poklicni nogomet,
A. while on the one hand, the existing primary law of the European Community does not confer on the Community any responsibility for sport in general or for professional football in particular, on the other hand neither are they excluded from the scope of application and, among other things, the case-law of the European Court of Justice (Court of Justice) and decisions taken by the European Commission make clear that in particular the ban on discrimination imposed by Article 12 of the EC Treaty, the principle of freedom of movement for workers enshrined in Article 39 thereof, the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services laid down in Articles 43 and 49 thereof, the provisions on competition set out in Articles 81 to 87 thereof and the provisions on employment and social policy have had an impact on sport and professional football,
- zaradi te pravne podlage se tudi v izjavah k amsterdamski pogodbi iz leta 1997 in izjavi Evropskega sveta iz Nice iz leta 2000 ni nič spremenilo in to niti ni bilo predvideno,
- the declarations attached to the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam and the declaration issued by the Nice European Council in 2000 did not change, and did not seek to change, this legal situation,
B. poleg tega bi bilo treba posebno vlogo športa, upoštevano v amsterdamski pogodbi, v izjavi iz Nice in v sodni praksi Sodišča, priznati v sklepih in pravnih predpisih na vseh ravneh odločanja, bi bilo treba tudi zagotoviti, da bodo nacionalne nogometne zveze, UEFA in FIFA, pa tudi nacionalna, evropska in mednarodna združenja za poklicni nogomet nadzorovali in preverjali izvajanje predpisov,
B. while the specificity of sport, which is recognised in the Amsterdam Treaty, the Declaration of Nice and the case-law of the Court of Justice, should be recognised and implemented in decisions and legislation by all levels of government, it should also be noted that the application of a layer of regulation is monitored and controlled by national football authorities, UEFA and FIFA, respectively the national, European and world governing bodies in professional football,
C. tudi sekundarna zakonodaja posebnih zahtev poklicnega nogometa ne ureja sistematično, to velja zlasti za določbe o priznavanju diplom in o dovoljenjih za trenerje, zastopnike igralcev in igralce, ki niso iz EU; v študiji Independent European Sport Review se od evropskih zakonodajalcev zahteva delovanje tudi na naslednjih problematičnih področjih, povezanih s poklicnim nogometom: pranje denarja, goljufije pri stavah, izkoriščanje mlajših igralcev in nezakonito trgovanje z igralci, ureditev za loterijo za primer, da zanjo ne bi več veljal državni monopol, boj proti rasizmu in huliganstvu, črni trg z vstopnicami,
C. secondary law also fails to take systematic account of the specific requirements of professional football; this concerns, in particular, the provisions governing the recognition of diplomas and the award of licences to trainers, players’ agents and players from non-EU countries; the Independent European Sport Review also calls for action by the European legislator in the following problem areas linked to professional football: money laundering, betting fraud, exploitation of young players and illegal trading in players, lottery regulation should national monopolies be abolished, measures to combat racism and hooliganism and the black market for tickets,
D. zaradi vedno večje profesionalizacije in komercializacije športa na splošno, zlasti nogometa, prihaja do vedno več stičnih točk z zakonodajo EU, kar se kaže tudi v naraščajočem številu zadev, naslovljenih na Sodišče in Komisijo,
D. the greater professionalisation and commercialisation of sport in general and football in particular has made EU law much more relevant in this area, a fact reflected in the growing number of cases pending before the Court of Justice and the Commission,
- tako se je problem pravne negotovosti bistveno zaostril in bo za zadevne sektorje reševanje zgolj posamičnih primerov čedalje manj zadovoljivo, kar je bilo zapisano tudi v nedavno objavljeni študiji Independent European Sport Review 2006 , ki so jo naročili nekateri ministri za šport držav članic,
- this has greatly exacerbated the problem of legal uncertainty and the sectors concerned increasingly see an approach based solely on treating cases individually as inadequate, a view also documented in the study commissioned by a number of sports ministers in the EU Member States and recently published under the title Independent European Sport Review 2006,
- ta pravna negotovost ni problematična le z gospodarskega vidika, ampak zlasti za družbene, kulturne in pedagoške naloge nogometa; zato ni jasno, ali bi pravilo UEFE o najmanjšem obveznem številu doma vzgojenih igralcev, ki je izjemno pomembno za vzgajanje podmladka, na sodišču prestalo preskus skladnosti s členom 12 Pogodbe,
- the legal uncertainty which currently exists is not only problematical in economic terms, but in particular as regards the performance of football’s social, cultural and educational tasks; it is not clear, for example, whether the UEFA rule stipulating that teams must contain a minimum number of home-grown players, a provision which is extremely important for youth development, would, if it underwent legal review by the Court of Justice, prove to be consistent with Article 12 of the EC Treaty,
E. ugotavlja, da se v sodni praksi Sodišča športna pravila razlikujejo od ekonomskih pravil vodstvenih organov v poklicnem nogometu; športni predpisi so lahko zunaj področja uporabe Pogodbe, medtem ko ekonomski predpisi bodisi spadajo v njeno področje uporabe bodisi ne, vendar jih je mogoče upravičiti ali prepovedati v okviru Pogodbe;
E. Notes that there is a distinction drawn in the case-law of the Court of Justice between the sporting and economic rules of governing bodies applicable to professional football; sporting rules fall outside the scope of the Treaty, while economic rules may fall either outside or within the scope of the Treaty, and may be capable of justification under or be prohibited by the Treaty,
F. pri pravilih, ki zadevajo sestavo državnih reprezentanc
F. considers that the rules on the composition of national teams
Prim. zadevo 36/74, odstavek 8, in zadevo 13/76, odstavek 14. , ali pri tistih, povezanih z izbiro članov športnih zvez, ki se lahko udeležijo mednarodnih tekmovanj na visoki ravni
See Case 36/74, paragraph 8, and Case 13/76, paragraph 14. , or the rules relating to the selection by sports federations of those of their members who may participate in high-level international competitions
H. o izbiri državnega oziroma športnega sodnega organa se ne sme vnaprej skleniti sporazuma, s katerim bi morebitne spore prenesli izključno na organe in/ali razsodišča zvez, pač pa mora biti izbira posledica proste izbire obeh strank šele po nastanku spora,
H. considers that the choice of public or sports jurisdiction may not be the subject of a prior agreement, with referral of future disputes exclusively to federal bodies and/or arbitrating bodies, but should be the outcome of a free choice by the parties taken following the launch of the action,
J. zaradi te pravne negotovosti prav tako ni jasno, kolikšna je avtonomija samoupravnih ustanov, kot so UEFA in nacionalne zveze, koliko so pri izvajanju svojih samoupravnih pravic in vodstvenih nalog odvisne od nekaterih načel zakonodaje EU (nediskriminacija, proporcionalnost, demokratični postopki, skladni z načelom pravne države, varovanje pravic igralcev) in koliko svobode lahko imajo pri izvajanju svojega "monopola" (problem pravila o igranju doma in v gosteh, ustanavljanje novih lig, zakonodaja o blagovnih znamkah), in ali to, da na istem trgu delujejo hkrati kot upravni in ekonomski akter, povzroča nasprotje interesov oziroma zlorabo položaja,
J. likewise as a result of this legal uncertainty, it is not clear how much autonomy self-regulating bodies, such as UEFA and national associations, enjoy, to what extent they are bound, when exercising their right to self-regulation and performing their regulatory tasks, by certain principles of EU law (non-discrimination, proportionality, democratic and constitutional procedures, safeguarding of players’ rights), and how free they are to exercise their ‘monopoly’ (problem of the home and away rule, breakaway leagues, trademark law), or whether, when they act both as a regulator and an economic operator in the same market, this results in a conflict of interests or the abuse of a dominant position,
- tudi v športu je treba zagotoviti prednost zakonodaje Skupnosti in dostop do pristojnih sodišč v državah članicah in v Uniji,
- the primacy of Community law and access to the normal legal channels of the Member States and of the Union must be safeguarded also in sport,
K. evropski nogomet potrebuje enake pogoje pri mednarodnih tekmovanjih, tako v gospodarskem kot pravnem smislu, česar pa različna pravila v državah članicah ne omogočajo, na primer pravila za (skupni ali posamični) marketing televizijskih pravic, pogoji za brezplačno poročanje na prosto dostopnih televizijskih postajah, različna državna oziroma lokalna pravila o pomoči in davkih, sprejemanje igralcev iz tretjih držav, razlike pri podeljevanju dovoljenj in pogoji za lastništvo in vodenje klubov; vse to močno vpliva na konkurenco v športu,
K. European football needs a level playing field, in both economic and legal terms, for international competitions, but this is ruled out by the differing arrangements which apply in individual Member States, for example the rules on the (joint or individual) marketing of television rights, the conditions governing free-to-air coverage by public television stations, differing national and/or local rules on subsidies and taxes, the rules governing the use of players from third countries, differing licensing practices and conditions governing the ownership and management of clubs; this state of affairs is also seriously undermining sporting competition,
- uporaba zakonodaje EU, zlasti sodbe v zadevi Bosman na Sodišču, je pozitivno vplivala na pravice poklicnih igralcev, obenem pa po podatkih FIFPro
- the application of EU law, in particular the Bosman judgment of the Court of Justice, has had a positive impact on the rights of professional players, but at the same time, according to FIFPro
Mednarodna zveza poklicnih nogometašev (Fédération Internationale des Footballeurs Professionnels) okoli 50 % poklicnih igralcev v Evropi s svojim klubom nima sklenjene pogodbe o zaposlitvi, veliko pogodb o zaposlitvi ali usposabljanju pa je problematičnih s pravnega vidika,
Fédération Internationale des Footballeurs Professionnels (International Federation of Professional Footballers) roughly 50% of professional players in Europe do not have an employment contract with their clubs and many employment and training contracts in this area are legally questionable,
- tudi člen o športu (člen III-282), ki v ustavno pogodbo ni bil vključen na konvenciji, pač pa na medvladni konferenci, in ki je v enako negotovem položaju kot ustavna pogodba, že razlagajo na zelo raznovrstne načine in je problematičen zato, ker velja sodobni poklicni nogomet za pretežno gospodarsko dejavnost in ker uporabe zakonodaje EU ne bi smeli omejevati z vzpostavljanjem "prostovoljnih struktur" ter socialnimi in vzgojnimi nalogami – to namreč splošno gledano ne zadostuje, da bi se povečala pravna gotovost;
- the article dealing with sport (Article III-282), which was incorporated into the Constitutional Treaty not by the Convention, but rather by the Intergovernmental Conference, shares the uncertain fate of the Constitutional Treaty itself, is already being interpreted in a very wide variety of ways, and is problematical in that professional football today essentially presents itself as an economic activity and the application of EU law should not be kept at bay by invoking ‘voluntary structures’ and social and educational tasks; in overall terms, EU law is not applied in such a manner as to increase legal certainty,
- evropski nogomet, ki temelji na nacionalnem načelu, mora vzpostaviti dobro ravnotežje med nacionalno osnovo igre in evropsko ravnijo, da bi nogometnim ligam in zvezam omogočil učinkovito sodelovanje;
- European football, based as it is on the principle of nationality, needs to strike a proper balance between the national foundation of the game and the European level so as to enable football leagues and associations to cooperate efficiently,
Prim. zadeve 36/74 Walrave in Koch [1974] PSES 1405, odstavek 5; zadevo 13/76 Donà [1976] PSES 1333, odstavka 12 in 13; zadevo C-415/93 Bosman [1995] PSES I-4921, odstavek 73. ,
See Case 36/74 Walrave and Koch [1974] ECR 1405, paragraph 5; Case 13/76 Donà [1976] ECR 1333, paragraphs 12 and 13; Case C-415/93 Bosman [1995] ECR I-4921, paragraph 73. ,
Prim. sodbe v zadevah C-415/93, odstavka 114 in 137; C-176/96, Lehtonen, [2000] PSES I‑2681, odstavek 60, in C-438/00, Deutscher Handballbund, [2003] PSES I-4135, odstavki 56–58. ,
See the judgments in Case C-145/93, paragraphs 114 and 137; Case C-176/96, Lehtonen [2000], ECR I ‑2681, paragraph 60; and Case C-438/00, Deutscher Handballbund [2003], ECR I-4135, paragraphs 56-58. ,
N. načela iz sodne prakse v zvezi z izvajanjem določb Skupnosti o prostem pretoku oseb in storitev pri športnih pravilih so veljavna tudi glede na določbe Pogodbe o ES o konkurenci; lahko pa vplivajo na svoboščine, ki jih zagotavljajo te določbe, in se zanje lahko uporabi postopek po členih 81 in 82 Pogodbe,
N. Considers that the principles extracted from the case-law, as regards the application to sporting regulations of the Community provisions in respect of the freedom of movement of persons and services, are equally valid as regards the Treaty provisions relating to competition and are capable, in an appropriate case, of constituting an infringement of the liberties guaranteed by those provisions and of being the subject of a proceeding pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty,
O. izključno športna pravila, tj. pravila za vprašanja zgolj športnega interesa, ki niso gospodarska dejavnost, ne spadajo v področje uporabe Pogodbe
O. considers that purely sporting rules, that is to say rules concerning questions of purely sporting interest and, as such, having nothing to do with economic activity, do not fall within the scope of the Treaty
P. poziva Komisijo, da v okviru smernic za evropski nogomet določi tudi s tem povezane pravne okvirne pogoje in prispeva k povečanju pravne varnosti,
P. Calls on the Commission, in the context of European football, to provide guidance on the legal framework for the sport, thereby making for a greater degree of legal certainty,
Q. meni, da bi lahko v okviru akcijskega načrta uporabili različna sredstva iz pogodb o EU, čeprav te ne določajo posebne pravne pristojnosti za šport, na primer:
Q. Takes the view that, although they lay down no specific legislative competence for sport, the EU Treaties contain a wide array of instruments which could be employed as part of an action plan, e.g.:
- direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dovoljenjih za igralce iz nečlanic EU, o varstvu mladih igralcev in zastopnikov igralcev;
- European Parliament and Council directives to deal with the issues of licences for players from non-EU countries, the protection of young players and the role of players’ agents;
- skupinsko oprostitev glede različnih vidikov konkurenčne zakonodaje, na primer oglaševalskih pogodb, denarne pomoči;
- group exemptions in connection with various aspects of competition law, e.g. marketing contracts, subsidies;
- direktive Komisije v skladu s členom 211 Pogodbe o ES o uporabi konkurenčnega prava; v zvezi s tem bi bilo treba ugotoviti, kako športne organizacije zagotavljajo storitve v splošnem gospodarskem interesu v smislu člena 86 Pogodbe;
- Commission directives pursuant to Article 211 of the EC Treaty on the application of competition law; in that connection, steps should be taken to determine whether sporting organisations provide services of general economic interest within the meaning of Article 86 of the EC Treaty;
- instrumente socialnega dialoga, zlasti pri vprašanjih o pravicah igralcev;
- the machinery of social dialogue, in particular in connection with issues relating to players’ rights;
- priporočila državam članicam o zmanjševanju razlik med državami (na primer s centralnimi oglaševalskimi sistemi);
- recommendations to the Member States with a view to replacing differing national arrangements with, for example, central marketing systems;