natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
45. poziva Komisijo, naj daje večjo prednost priznavanju netrgovinskih zadev v okviru prihodnjega sporazuma s Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo; ugotavlja, da bi to EU omogočilo zagotoviti, da uvožena biogoriva izpolnjujejo določena trajnostna merila, zlasti z okoljskega vidika;
45. calls on the Commission to increase the priority given to the recognition of the non-trade concerns as part of a future WTO agreement; notes that this would enable the EU to ensure that imported biofuels meet certain sustainability criteria, predominantly in the environmental field;
46. poudarja potrebo po ustreznem upravljanju z uvoženimi biogorivi na ravni Skupnosti in poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o uvedbi kvalificiranega dostopa na trg za uvožena biogoriva iz tretjih držav, da se industriji biogoriv v EU omogoči razvoj in konkurenčnost ob hkratnem upoštevanju visokih okoljskih standardov;
46. stresses the need for appropriate Community management of biofuels imports and asks the Commission to consider putting in place qualified market access arrangements for biofuel imports from third countries, in order to allow the biofuel industry in the EU to develop and become competitive while applying high environmental standards;
47. meni, da je obdavčitev Skupnosti za uvožena biogoriva potrebna samo, če bo zaradi okoljskega in socialnega dampinga ogrožena konkurenčnost evropske industrije biogoriv;
47. considers Community taxation of biofuel imports to be required only if the competitiveness of Europe's biofuels industry is endangered by environmental and social dumping;
48. poziva Komisijo, naj v EU in državah v razvoju spremlja učinek povpraševanja po biogorivih, zeleni elektriki, ogrevanju in hlajenju na cene proizvodov in stranskih proizvodov, njihovo dostopnost konkurenčnim industrijam ter vpliv na oskrbo s hrano in njeno ceno; če zvišanje cen povzroči pomanjkanje hrane v revnejših državah ali med revnejšimi sloji prebivalstva, naj Komisija nemudoma sprejme regulatorne ukrepe;
48. calls upon the Commission to monitor the impact of demand for biofuel, green electricity, heating and cooling on commodity and by-product prices, their availability for competing industries and the impact on food supply and prices, in the EU and in developing countries, and, in the event of price rises which result in food shortages in poorer countries or among poorer sections of the population, to take immediate regulatory action;
49. poziva Komisijo, naj z ustreznimi spodbudami pospeši napajanje plinskega omrežja z bioplinom in uporabo bioplina kot goriva, s čimer bo še nadalje prispevala k zmanjšanju odvisnosti od uvoza energije;
49. calls on the Commission to step up the feeding of biogas into the gas network and the use of biogas as a fuel by means of appropriate incentives and thus to make a further contribution to reducing dependence on energy imports;
50. poziva Komisijo, naj na splošno ne spodbuja intenzivnega gojenja obnovljivih virov energije z enostranskim poudarkom na proizvodnji, kar bi pogubno vplivalo na okolje, gospodarstvo in socialo in tako ne bi prispevalo k evropski strategiji trajnostnega razvoja;
50. calls on the Commission, in general, not to encourage the development of intensive cultivation of renewable energy resources with a one-sided emphasis on production, which would have a disastrous environmental, economic and social impact and would not, therefore, contribute to the European sustainable development strategy;
51. poudarja potrebo po informacijski politiki na področju biomase in biogoriv za celotno EU;
51. stresses the need for an EU-wide information policy on biomass and biofuels;
53. meni, da je glede na izvajanje sladkorne reforme in opuščanje gojenja sladkorne pese v EU treba skrbno preučiti, kako je mogoče povečati sedanje možnosti za proizvodnjo biogoriv iz sladkorne pese in drugih alternativnih poljščin;
53. considers that, with a view to the implementation of the sugar reform and the discontinuation of sugar beet cultivation in the EU, an analysis needs to be made of exactly how existing potential for producing biofuels from sugar beet and other alternative crops might be enhanced;
54. poziva Komisijo naj ukrepa, da se čim prej doseže dogovor med avtomobilsko in naftno industrijo glede biogoriv v skladu z načelom „biogoriva za vozila, ne vozila za biogoriva“.
54. calls on the Commission to take action with a view to reaching a compromise on biofuels between the motor vehicle and petroleum industries at the earliest opportunity, in line with the principle 'biofuels for cars, not cars for biofuels'.
Strategija EU za biomaso in biogoriva
EU-Strategy on Biomass and Biofuels
o strategiji za biomaso in biogoriva
on Strategy on Biomass and Biofuels
2. je trdno prepričan, da bosta proizvodnja in nadaljnji razvoj biomase in biogoriv prinesla pozitivne spodbude za konkurenčnost in trg delovne sile v Evropi;
Is firmly convinced that the production and further development of biomass and biofuels will provide a positive stimulus for competitiveness and the labour market in Europe;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj pred določitvijo zahtev glede proizvodnje uvoženih biogoriv preuči njihovo skladnost s pravili Svetovne trgovinske organizacije;
Calls on the Commission, before it sets production requirements for imported biofuels, to examine whether the requirements are in keeping with World Trade Organisation rules;
Strategija za biomaso in biogoriva
Strategy on Biomass and Biofuels
o strategiji za biomaso in biogoriva
on a strategy on biomass and biofuels
1. ugotavlja, da ima Evropska unija (EU) veliko zamudo pri uporabi in proizvodnji biogoriv, ki so ključnega pomena v mednarodni trgovini;
Notes that the EU is lagging seriously behind with regard to both the use and the production of biofuels, which are a crucial elements of international trade;
3. meni, da je za dosego teh ciljev treba razviti politiko za razvoj evropske industrije biogoriv in da je treba povečati uporabo teh proizvodov v EU; vendar opozarja na nevarnost nepopravljivih okoljskih posledic, ki bi jo lahko povzročili nepremišljena, nenadzorovana in intenzivna pridelava, proizvodnja in uvoz biogoriva;
Considers that in order to achieve these objectives a policy to develop a European biofuel industry must be developed and the use of such products in the EU increased; points, however, to the risk of irreversible environmental consequences which may be caused by the reckless, uncontrolled and intensive cultivation, production and import of biofuel;
9. meni, da če se v EU sprejmejo ukrepi za spodbujanje povpraševanja po bioetanolu, ki v nekaterih primerih zahtevajo uporabo javnega denarja ali imajo znatne proračunske posledice za Skupnost in njene države članice, ti ukrepi ne smejo delovati le v korist uvoza;
Considers that when measures are taken to stimulate demand for bioethanol in the EU, in some cases requiring the use of public money or entailing budgetary consequences for the Community and its Member States, such action must not work solely to the advantage of imports;
11. zahteva, da Komisija na pogajanjih o trgovini in okolju pri STO zelo odločno zavrne vse predloge, da se bioetanol uvrsti na seznam „okoljskih izdelkov“, za katere obstaja možnost odprave ali znižanja carin;
Calls on the Commission to reject very firmly any proposal, in the context of WTO negotiations on trade and the environment, to include bioethanol on a list of ‘environmental products’ which may be subject to removal or reduction of customs duties;
17. zahteva, da se v političnem in gospodarskem pogledu večja pozornost nameni sodelovanju med trgi z biogorivi v EU in njenih sosednih evropskih državah in njihovemu integriranju, zlasti v okviru posebnih partnerskih sporazumov;
Calls for greater political and economic attention to be paid to cooperation and integration among the biofuels markets in the EU and its neighbouring European states, particularly in the framework of the specific partnership agreements;
19. spodbuja Komisijo in države članice, naj bodo posebej pozorne na poskuse goljufij ali izogibanja plačilu carin za bioetanol, zlasti pa naj zagotovijo spoštovanje pravil o poreklu in tarifni uvrstitvi ter preprečijo zlorabe določenih carinskih ugodnosti;
Encourages the Commission and the Member States to exercise particular vigilance concerning attempted fraud or avoidance of customs duty on bioethanol, ensuring in particular compliance with the rules of origin and tariff classification and preventing abuses of some suspensive customs procedures;
22. poziva Komisijo, naj zlasti prek evropskega programa globalnega nadzorovanja okolja in varnosti (GMES) vzpostavi sistem certificiranja za biogoriva, ki se uporabljajo v EU, s čemer bi zagotovila, da je njihova proizvodnja v skladu z veljavnimi okoljskimi standardi ter da ta proizvodnja nima negativnega vpliva na okolje;
Invites the Commission to set up a certification system for biofuels used in the EU, with the aim of ensuring that their production is in conformity with the environmental standards in force, and to ensure that this production does not have any negative impact on the environment, in particular through the European programme Global Monitoring for Environment and Security system (GMES);
26. poziva Komisijo, da pojasni pravila o državni pomoči in da spodbuja davčne oprostitve ter s tem podpira razvoj biogoriv v EU;
Calls on the Commission to clarify State aid rules and encourage tax exemptions to support the development of biofuels in the EU;
To je še zlasti pomembno spričo napovedi, da bo v prihodnosti proizvodnja hrane po vsem svetu nezadostna; poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi, da to postane predmet mednarodne razprave.
Considers that the need to produce biofuels can only be seen as part of a healthy and realistic mix between food production and energy applications; this is particularly relevant in view of future worldwide shortages in food production; calls on the Commission to make this a topic for international debate.
Strategija za biomaso in biogoriva
Strategy on biomass and biofuels
Filip Kaczmarek (nadomešča Roberta Sturdyja)
Filip Kaczmarek (substituting Robert Sturdy)
o strategiji za biomaso in biogoriva
on a strategy for biomass and biofuels
Odbor za promet in turizem poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
– meni, da je treba določiti smernice prihodnjih odločitev o energetski politiki, ne da bi spodbujali sektorske ukrepe in usmerjali vlaganja v protislovne smeri;
– considers that pointers should be laid down for future options for energy policy that avoid promoting sector-specific actions or channelling investment in converse directions;
– poudarja, da je treba pri obravnavi vprašanja domače proizvodnje in uvoza biomase upoštevati vidik spodbujanja razvoja samostojnega sektorja biomase v Evropski uniji;
– emphasises that, when evaluating the issue of the domestic production and import of biomass, promoting the development of an independent biomass sector in the European Union is an aspect that must be taken into account,
– zahteva, da se glede uporabe in pospeševanja biogoriv določijo novi dolgoročni cilji do leta 2020, zato da se pridobi zaupanje vlagateljev;
– calls for new long-term targets to be laid down for the period up to 2020 for the use and promotion of biofuels in order to gain the confidence of investors;
– je prepričan, da se mora strategija Evropske unije za pospeševanje biogoriv zlasti zaradi lizbonske strategije ravnati po načelu učinkovitosti in trajnosti, ukrepi pa ne smejo biti povezani z nesorazmerno visokimi administrativnimi stroški;
– is convinced that the European Union strategy for promoting biofuels, particularly against the background of the Lisbon Strategy, must be guided by efficiency and sustainability and that measures must not be allowed to generate a disproportionately high level of administrative expenditure;
– želi, da se izvaja osmo priporočilo skupine CARS 21, ki v biogorivih druge generacije vidi posebej obetajočo tehnologijo za zmanjšanje CO² v prometu;
– calls for the eighth recommendation of the CARS 21 Group, according to which second generation biofuels are a particularly promising technology for reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the transport sector, to be translated into action;
– poudarja, da še vedno obstaja potreba po ukrepih za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti;
– emphasises that action still needs to be taken to improve energy efficiency;
– poudarja, da je treba v Evropski uniji uvesti davek na goriva na osnovi izpustov CO 2 z namenom izboljšanja davčnega položaja goriv, ki zaradi boljše bilance izpustov CO 2 več prispevajo k njihovemu zmanjševanju;
– emphasises the need to introduce a CO 2 -based fuel tax in the European Union in order to provide a fiscal incentive for those fuels which make a greater contribution to cutting CO 2 emissions by virtue of a better CO 2 balance;
– želi, da se opredeli različne vrste biogoriv druge generacije, da bo z vidika okoljskih posledic razvidna razlika med proizvodnjo, ki izhaja iz gospodarjenja z gozdovi, in proizvodnjo, ki izhaja iz odpadnih lignoceluloznih materialov, organskih odpadkov z deponij in surovin rastlinskega in živalskega izvora;
– calls for the definition of different types of second generation biofuels in order to distinguish, given the impacts on the environment, between sylviculture products and products derived from lignocellulosic waste materials, landfill organic waste and raw materials of animal and vegetable origin;
– meni, da je treba čim prej določiti tehnične standarde za biogoriva in znova preučiti obstoječo direktivo o kakovosti goriv, da se omogoči povečanje deleža biogoriv v bencinu in dizelskem gorivu;
– considers that, as soon as possible, the technical standards for biofuels should be laid down and the existing directive on fuel quality should be reviewed in order to allow a higher admixture of biofuels in petrol and diesel;
– meni, da imajo biogoriva druge generacije (tekoča biogoriva) bistveno večjo energijsko zmogljivost od biogoriv prve generacije;
– is of the opinion that second-generation biofuels (BTL fuels) have a much higher energy use potential than first-generation biofuels;
– meni, da je treba spodbuditi evropsko platformo za biogoriva z vidika njihove uporabe v prevozu;
– considers that the creation of a European platform for biofuels, with a view to their use in transport, should be promoted;
– pričakuje, da bodo države članice vlaganja v proizvodnjo biomase za promet spodbujale tako, da bo to združljivo s strukturno in kmetijsko-politično ureditvijo;
– expects Member States to introduce investment incentives for the production of biomass in the transport sector that are compatible with the structural and agricultural policy rules;
– priporoča, da se pri pospeševanju izdelkov in tehnologije upošteva možna uporaba biogoriv v vseh načinih prevoza;
– recommends that the possible use of biofuels in all modes of transport be considered in the context of product and technology promotion;
– poudarja, da bo v večdesetletnem prehodnem obdobju potreben stabilen referenčni okvir za spodbujanje konkurenčnosti bioloških goriv in omogočanje razvoja odprtega trga, ki ga bodo oblikovale odločitve porabnikov;
– emphasises that in order to make biofuels competitive and enable the growth of an open market on which consumers can make their own choices felt, it would be desirable for a stable reference framework to be established for a transitional period of several decades;
– zahteva, da se v smislu dolgoročno zastavljene strategije pospeševanja konkurenčnega trga za biogoriva v Evropski uniji, zlasti glede davčnih spodbud, vzpostavijo zanesljivi okvirni pogoji za vlagatelje in proizvajalce;
– calls for reliable general conditions to be laid down for investors and manufacturers in the interests of a long-term strategy to promote a competitive market for biofuels in the European Union, particularly in terms of tax incentives;
– priporoča, da se pojasnijo načini kmetijske proizvodnje alternativnih goriv in učinki njihove intenzivnejše proizvodnje;
– calls for clarification of the methods of agricultural production of alternative fuels and the possible impacts of more intensive production;
– podpira razvoj in uvedbo evropskega sistema certificiranja, ki bo na gospodarskem, ekološkem in socialnem področju zagotavljal minimalne standarde pri proizvodnji goriv; poudarja, da bi se moral tak sistem uporabljati tako za biogoriva, proizvedena v Uniji, kot tudi za tista, uvožena iz tretjih držav;
– supports the development and introduction of a European certification system in order to guarantee minimum standards in the manufacture of biofuels in the areas of economics, ecology and social welfare; stresses that such a system should be applicable both to domestically manufactured biofuels and to imports from third countries;
- poudarja, da je na področju biomase in biogoriv potrebna informacijska politika, ki bo pokrivala celotno območje Evropske unije;
– emphasizes the need for a Union-wide information policy in the area of biomass and biofuels.
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
8Substitute(s) present for the final vote
Strategija za biomaso in biogorivo
Strategy on biomass and biofuels
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi statuta skupnega podjetja Galileo, priloženega Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 876/2002
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending the Statutes of the Galileo Joint Undertaking annexed to Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002
(Poenostavljeni postopek – Člen 43(1) Poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure – Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
PE 380.603v02-00
PE 378.490v02-00
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( COM(2006)0351 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0351 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 171 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0252/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 171 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0252/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0348/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0348/2006 ),
Predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembi statuta skupnega podjetja Galileo, priloženega Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 876/2002
Proposal for a Council regulation amending the Statutes of the Galileo Joint Undertaking annexed to Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002
Letno poročilo Evropske centralne banke za leto 2005
on the 2005 Annual Report of the European Central Bank
o letnem poročilu Evropske centralne banke za leto 2005
on the 2005 Annual Report of the European Central Bank
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Evropske centralne banke za leto 2005,
– having regard to the 2005 Annual Report of the European Central Bank,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 2. aprila 1998 o demokratičnem nadzoru tretje faze Evropske monetarne unije (EMU)
– having regard to its resolution of 2 April 1998 on democratic accountability in the third stage of Economic and Monetary Union
– ob upoštevanju svojega glasovanja z dne 5. julija 2005 z zavrnitvijo predloga resolucije o letnem poročilu ECB za leto 2004,
– having regard to its vote of 5 July 2005 rejecting the motion for a resolution on the 2004 Annual Report of the European Central Bank,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 17. maja 2006 o javnih financah v evropski monetarni uniji (EMU)
– having regard to its resolution of 17 May 2006 on public finances in the European Monetary Union
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 12. julija 2006 o letni izjavi o območju eura ( KOM(2006)0392 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 12 July 2006 on the annual statement on the euro area ( COM(2006)0392 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 13. marca 2003 o priporočilu Evropske centralne banke glede sklepa Sveta o spremembi člena 10.2 statutov Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke
– having regard to its position of 13 March 2003 on the recommendation of the European Central Bank for a proposal for a Council decision on an amendment to Article 10.2 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank
– ob upoštevanju poročila o finančni stabilnosti in poročila o finančnem povezovanju euroobmočja Evropske centralne banke,
– having regard to the European Central Bank’s reports on financial stability and on financial integration in the euro zone,
– ob upoštevanju pisma predsednika Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve predsedniku Ekonomsko-finančnega sveta z dne 5. maja 2006 o postopku imenovanja direktorja Evropske centralne banke,
– having regard to the letter of 5 May 2006 from the chairwoman of its Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs to the President-in-Office of the Ecofin Council concerning the procedure for appointing the European Central Bank's Executive Board,
– ob upoštevanju gospodarskih napovedi Eurosistema junija 2006,
– having regard to the Eurosystem economic forecasts issued in June 2006,
– ob upoštevanju členov 106 in 112(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 106 and 112(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0349/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0349/2006 ),
A. ob priznavanju popolne neodvisnosti Evropske centralne banke (ECB) in Evropskega sistema centralnih bank (ESCB);
A . acknowledging the full independence of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European System of Central Banks (ESCB),
B. ker je glavni cilj ECB in ESCB zagotavljanje stabilnosti cen ob podpori splošnih gospodarskih politik Evropske skupnosti, kot je opredeljeno v členu 2 Pogodbe ES; ker člen 105 pogodbe ES pravi, da monetarna politika prispeva k uresničevanju ciljev Skupnosti, "če to ni v nasprotju s ciljem stabilnosti cen";
B. whereas the main objective of the ECB and of the ESCB is to maintain price stability while supporting the general economic policies of the Community, as defined in Article 2 of the EC Treaty; whereas Article 105 of the EC Treaty states that monetary policy should contribute 'without prejudice to the objective of price stability' to the achievement of the Community objectives,
C. ker se je bruto domači proizvod (BDP) euroobmočja v letu 2005 povečal za 1,4 %, kar je manj glede na doseženo 1,8-odstotno rast leta 2004, medtem ko se je inflacija euroobmočja ustalila pri 2,2 %, ki je blizu odstotku v letu 2004 (2,1 %);
C. whereas the gross domestic product (GDP) of the euro zone increased by 1.4% in 2005, below the 2004 figure of 1.8%, whilst the inflation rate in the euro zone was 2.2%, close to the 2004 figure of 2.1%,
D. ker države članice niso znale enako izkoristiti visoke svetovne rasti v letu 2005, kar se med drugim lahko pripiše zvišanju cen nafte in neugodnemu razvoju menjalnih tečajev, je bil decembra 2005 tečaj eura višji kot 1,17 dolarja (v primerjavi z najvišjim tečajem 1,36 dolarja decembra 2004), ker napovedi rasti kažejo na nekakšno stopnjo okrevanja gospodarstva, Komisija predvideva 2,5-odstotno rast v letu 2006 in od 1,3 % do 2,3 % v letu 2007 ter tudi stabilnost inflacije, ki bo nekoliko višja od 2 %;
D. whereas Member States were unable to benefit equally from strong worldwide growth in 2005; whereas, among other reasons, this can be attributed to rising oil prices and unfavourable movements in exchange rates, which left the euro at more than USD 1.17 in December 2005 (compared with its December 2004 peak of USD 1.36), whereas growth forecasts point to a degree of economic recovery, with projections by the Commission indicating growth of 2.5% for 2006 and between 1.3% and 2.3% for 2007, together with inflation at slightly more than 2%,