natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ko bo protokol sklenjen, bo formalno spremenjen tudi sam institucionalni okvir sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu, političnem usklajevanju in sodelovanju med EU in Mehiko, saj se bosta skupnemu svetu in skupnemu odboru pridružili dve novi članici, Bolgarija in Romunija.
When it will be concluded, the institutional framework of the EU-Mexico Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement will itself be formally modified, because both the Joint Council and the Joint Committee will be extended through the inclusion of two new Members, that is to say Bulgaria and Romania;
c) Glede na to je mogoče trditi, da predlog sklepa Sveta vsebuje spremembo "posebnega institucionalnega okvira" iz osnovnega sporazuma v smislu drugega pododstavka člena 300(3) pogodbe o ES, zato se zahteva postopek privolitve Evropskega parlamenta.
c) To that extent, it can be argued that the proposal for a Council decision purports a modification of the "specific institutional framework?' foreseen in the main agreement, within the meaning of Article 300(3), second subparagraph, EC, and that the assent procedure of the European Parliament is therefore required.
mnenje Odbora za pravne zadeve o pravni podlagi
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Drugega dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu, političnem usklajevanju in sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Združenimi mehiškimi državami na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji KOM(2006)0777 – C6‑0077/2007 – 2006/0259(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of a Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union ( COM(2006)0777 – C6‑0077/2007 – 2006/0259(CNS) )
v pismu z dne 8. marca 2007 ste v skladu s členom 35(2) poslovnika Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosili za mnenje o točnosti in primernosti pravne podlage zgoraj omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 8 March 2007 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Odbor je to vprašanje obravnaval na seji dne 20. marca 2007.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 20 March 2007.
Predlagana pravna podlaga so členi 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5) in 181 v povezavi s prvim in drugim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe o ES ter prvim pododstavkom člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES.
The legal basis proposed is Articles 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5) and 181 in conjunction with the first subparagraph, first and second sentences of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty.
Sporočili ste, da namerava odbor spremeniti pravno podlago, da se bo sklicevala na drugi pododstavek člena 300(3) in ne na prvi pododstavek tega člena.
You informed us that your committee is considering amending the legal basis so as to refer to the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) rather than the first subparagraph of that provision.
S to spremembo pravne podlage bi Parlament sodeloval po postopku privolitve in ne le posvetovanja.
This change in the legal basis would give Parliament the benefit of the assent procedure rather than mere consultation.
Pristojni odbor je za mnenje zaprosil pravno službo, ki podpira spremembo pravne podlage.
The lead committee has sought the opinion of the Legal Service, which supports this change in the legal basis.
Člen 300 (3)
Article 300(3)
Z izjemo sporazumov iz člena 133(3) sklepa Svet sporazume po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom, tudi kadar sporazum zajema področje, pri katerem je za sprejetje notranjih predpisov potreben postopek iz člena 251 ali 252.
The Council shall conclude agreements after consulting the European Parliament, except for the agreements referred to in Article 133(3), including cases where the agreement covers a field for which the procedure referred to in Article 251 or that referred to in Article 252 is required for the adoption of internal rules.
Evropski parlament da svoje mnenje v roku, ki ga lahko glede na nujnost zadeve določi Svet.
The European Parliament shall deliver its opinion within a time-limit which the Council may lay down according to the urgency of the matter.
Če ne da mnenja v tem roku, lahko Svet ukrepa.
In the absence of an opinion within that time-limit, the Council may act.
Z odstopanjem od prejšnjega pododstavka se sporazumi iz člena 310, drugi sporazumi, ki z uvedbo postopkov sodelovanja vzpostavljajo poseben institucionalni okvir , sporazumi, ki imajo znatne proračunske posledice za Skupnost, in sporazumi, katerih posledica je sprememba akta, sprejetega v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251, sklepajo po pridobitvi privolitve Evropskega parlamenta.
By way of derogation from the previous subparagraph, agreements referred to in Article 310, other agreements establishing a specific institutional framework by organising cooperation procedures , agreements having important budgetary implications for the Community and agreements entailing amendment of an act adopted under the procedure referred to in Article 251 shall be concluded after the assent of the European Parliament has been obtained.
Treba je ugotoviti, ali ta sporazum z uvedbo postopkov sodelovanja vzpostavlja poseben institucionalni okvir .
The question to be determined is whether the agreement in question establishes a specific institutional framework by organising cooperation procedures.
Ugotavlja se, in limine , da je treba glede na uveljavljeno sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča
It is noted, in limine , that it is settled case-law of the Court of Justice
Glej zadevo C-338/01 Komisija proti Svetu [2004] ECR.
See Case C-338/01 Commission v. Council [2004] ECR.
Obravnavani predlog vsebuje samo člen o odobritvi sklenitve Drugega dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu, političnem usklajevanju in sodelovanju.
The content of proposal under consideration consists in a sole article approving the conclusion of the Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and the Cooperation Agreement.
Namen dodatnega protokola je izražen v členu 1, ki pravi, da "Republika Bolgarija in Romunija s tem postaneta pogodbenici Sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu, političnem usklajevanju in sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Združenimi mehiškimi državami na drugi."
The aim of the Additional Protocol is expressed in its Article 1, which holds that "The Republic of Bulgaria and Romania are hereby incorporated as Parties to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part" .
Iz člena je razvidno, da je namen vključiti novi pogodbenici v osnovni sporazum.
It is clear from that article that the aim is to incorporate two new Parties to the main Agreement.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bila za osnovni sporazum potrebna privolitev Parlamenta v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3), saj očitno vzpostavlja "poseben institucionalni okvir" (Skupni svet lahko sprejme odločitve, zavezujoče za pogodbenice, in odloča o vzpostavitvi posebnega postopka za reševanje sporov v trgovini in trgovinskih zadevah, Skupni odbor pomaga Skupnemu svetu).
It should be noted that the main Agreement required the assent of Parliament under the second subparagraph of Article 300(3), since it clearly established a "specific institutional framework" (a Joint Council having the power to take decisions binding on the Parties and to decide on the establishment of a specific trade or trade-related dispute-settlement procedure and a Joint Committee to assist the Joint Council).
Kot v svojem mnenju poudarja pravna služba, mora Evropsko sodišče še pojasniti koncept "posebnega institucionalnega okvira" v smislu drugega pododstavka člena 300(3).
As the Legal Service points out in its opinion, the Court of Justice has yet to interpret the concept of a "specific institutional framework" within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 300(3).
Vendar se protokoli običajno sklepajo na enaki pravni podlagi kot osnovni sporazum, člen 3 predlaganega protokola pa določa, da je ta protokol sestavni del osnovnega sporazuma.
However, protocols are generally concluded on the same legal basis as the main agreement and Article 3 of the proposed Protocol provides that it is to form an integral part of the main agreement.
Ko bo protokol sklenjen, bo formalno spremenjen tudi sam institucionalni okvir, saj se bosta Skupni svet in Skupni odbor razširila z vključitvijo dveh novih članic, in sicer s člani predstavniki Bolgarije in Romunije.
Furthermore, when the Additional Protocol is concluded, the institutional framework will itself be formally modified, because both the Joint Council and the Joint Committee will be extended through the inclusion of two new Members - Members of the Council representing Bulgaria and Romania.
Glede na to je mogoče trditi, da predlog sklepa Sveta vsebuje spremembo " posebnega institucionalnega okvira " iz osnovnega sporazuma in se je zato treba sklicevati na drugi pododstavek člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES.
To that extent, it is considered that the proposal for a Council decision sets out to modify the " specific institutional framework " provided for in the main Agreement, and that hence reference should be made to the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty.
Glede na povedano, velja mnenje, da: predlog Sklepa Sveta spreminja " poseben institucionalni okvir ", določen v osnovnem sporazumu, predlagani protokol pa je njegov sestavni del.
In light of the foregoing, it is considered that: the proposal for a Council Decision sets out to modify the " specific institutional framework " provided for in the main Agreement, of which the proposed Protocol forms an integral part.
Tako je Odbor za pravne zadeve na svoji seji 20. marca 2007 soglasno
At its meeting of 20 March 2007 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči naslednji poslanci: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Cristian Dumitrescu (podpredsednik), Rainer Wieland (podpredsednik), Francesco Enrico Speroni (podpredsednik), Sharon Bowles, Mogens N.J. Camre, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Monica Frassoni, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Eva Lichtenberger, Toine Manders, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Michel Rocard, Aloyzas Sakalas, Gabriele Stauner, József Szájer, Jacques Toubon, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka. sklenil priporočiti, naj se pravna podlaga spremeni tako, da se bo sklicevala na drugi pododstavek člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, kjer se zahteva privolitev Parlamenta in ne le posvetovanje z njim.
The following were present for the final vote: Giuseppe Gargani (chairman), Cristian Dumitrescu (vice-chairman), Rainer Wieland (vice-chairman), Francesco Enrico Speroni (vice-chairman), Sharon Bowles, Mogens N.J. Camre, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Monica Frassoni, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Eva Lichtenberger, Toine Manders, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Michel Rocard, Aloyzas Sakalas, Gabriele Stauner, József Szájer, Jacques Toubon, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka. , to recommend that you that the legal basis should be changed so as to refer to the second paragraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty, which requires the assent and not merely consultation of Parliament.
predsednik Odbora za pravne zadeve
Chairman of the Committee on Legal Affairs
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Drugega dodatnega protokola k Sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu, političnem usklajevanju in sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Združenimi mehiškimi državami na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Mexico to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
o spremembi člena 47 poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta, „Okrepljeno sodelovanje med odbori“
on amendment of Rule 47 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure "Enhanced Cooperation between Committees"
PREDLOG SPREMEMBE POSLOVNIKA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA B6‑0461/2006..8
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF PARLIAMENT'S RULES OF PROCEDURE (B6-0461/2006) 8
o spremembi člena 47 poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta
on amendment of Rule 47 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure "Enhanced Cooperation between Committees"
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe svojega poslovnika ( B6-0461/2006 ),
– having regard to the proposal for amendment of its Rules of Procedure ( B6‑0461/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0139/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0139/2007 ),
Člen 47
Rule 47
Kadar je bilo vprašanje glede pristojnosti posredovano konferenci predsednikov v skladu s členom 179(2) ali 45 oziroma na podlagi priloge VI poslovnika in konferenca predsednikov meni, da vprašanje sodi skoraj v enaki meri v pristojnost dveh ali več odborov ali da različni deli vprašanja sodijo v pristojnost dveh ali več odborov, se uporablja člen 46 z naslednjimi dodatnimi določbami:
Where a question of competence has been referred to the Conference of Presidents pursuant to Rules 179(2) or 45 and the Conference of Presidents, on the basis of Annex VI of the Rules of Procedure, considers that the question falls almost equally within the competence of two or more committees, or that different parts of the question fall under the competence of two or more committees, Rule 46 shall apply with the following additional provisions:
- oba odbora se skupaj sporazumeta o časovnem razporedu;
- the timetable shall be jointly agreed by the two committees;
- zadevni odbori se skupaj sporazumejo o časovnem razporedu;
- the timetable shall be jointly agreed by the committees concerned ;
- poročevalec in pripravljavec mnenja si prizadevata sporazumeti se o besedilih, ki jih predlagata svojima odboroma , in o stališču glede predlogov sprememb;
- the rapporteur and the draftsman shall endeavour to agree on the texts they propose to their committees and on their position regarding amendments;
- poročevalec in pripravljavci mnenj se medsebojno obveščajo in si prizadevajo sporazumeti se o besedilih, ki jih predlagajo svojim odborom , in o stališču glede predlogov sprememb;
- the rapporteur and the draftsmen shall keep each other informed and shall endeavour to agree on the texts they propose to their committees and on their position regarding amendments;
- zadevni odbori lahko skupaj določijo dele besedila, ki so v njihovi izključni ali skupni pristojnosti, in se natančno dogovorijo o načinih sodelovanja;
- the committees concerned may jointly identify areas of the text falling within their exclusive or joint competences and agree on the precise arrangements for their cooperation;
pristojni odbor brez glasovanja sprejme spremembe, ki jih predlaga odbor, zaprošen za mnenje, kadar se te nanašajo na zadeve, za katere predsednik pristojnega odbora na podlagi Priloge VI in po posvetovanju s predsednikom odbora, zaprošenega za mnenje, meni, da sodijo v pristojnost odbora, zaprošenega za mnenje, in ki niso v nasprotju z ostalimi deli poročila.
- the committee responsible shall accept without a vote amendments from the committee asked for an opinion where they concern matters which the chairman of the committee responsible considers, on the basis of Annex VI, after consulting the chairman of the committee asked for an opinion, to fall under the competence of the committee asked for an opinion, and which do not contradict other elements of the report.
pristojni odbor brez glasovanja sprejme spremembe, ki jih predlaga odbor, zaprošen za mnenje, kadar se te nanašajo na zadeve, za katere predsednik pristojnega odbora na podlagi Priloge VI in po posvetovanju s predsednikom odbora, zaprošenega za mnenje, meni, da sodijo v pristojnost odbora, zaprošenega za mnenje, in ki niso v nasprotju z ostalimi deli poročila.
- the committee responsible shall accept without a vote amendments from a committee asked for an opinion where they concern matters which the chairman of the committee responsible considers, on the basis of Annex VI, after consulting the chairman of the committee asked for an opinion, to fall under the competence of the committee asked for an opinion, and which do not contradict other elements of the report.
Spremenjeni člen vključuje enega temeljnih pogojev za uspešen potek tovrstnega postopka, to je intenzivna in redna komunikacija med sodelujočimi pripravljavci mnenj.
The amended Rule now voices one of the fundamental requirements if this kind of procedure is to be successful, namely an intense and regular communication between the draftspersons involved.
Da bi preprečili prekrivanje s terminologijo, uporabljeno v pogodbah, je bilo predlagano, da se spremeni naslov člena: izraz „okrepljeno sodelovanje med državami članicami“ je namreč uporabljen v naslovu VII Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
It is suggested to change the title of the Rule in order to avoid any confusion with terminology used in the Treaties: Enhanced Cooperation between Member States under Title VII of the Treaty on European Union.
Uvodni stavek je bil spremenjen, da bi pojasnili, da je vprašanje o začetku postopka okrepljenega sodelovanja, ki je bil preimenovan v postopek s pridruženimi odbori, različica vprašanja o pristojnostih odborov.
The introductory phrase has been modified to make clear that the question whether an enhanced cooperation, renamed as procedure with associated committees, should take place is a variant of the question of competence of committees.
Po posvetovanju na konferenci predsednikov odborov, ki ji je 22. in 23. junija 2006 sledil seminar v Limelettu,
After discussions within the Conference of Committee Chairmen leading to a seminar held on 22 and 23 June 2006 at Limelette
Sklepi seminarja, tako imenovana deklaracija iz Limeletta, so bili poslani predsedniku v pismu 28. junija 2006.
The conclusions of this seminar, "Limelette declaration", were sent by letter of 28 June 2006 to the President.
Predlog spremembe člena 47 v tem osnutku poročila pretežno povzema omenjeni predlog, da se v postopek lahko vključi več kot dva odbora in da se postopek opredeli tako, da bo bolj prilagodljiv.
The amendment of Rule 47 contained in this draft report follows largely this proposal as far as the opening up of the procedure to more than two committees and making it more flexible is concerned.
Predlog spremembe pa ne povzema omenjenega predloga v točki, da lahko odbor, zaprošen za mnenje, vloži predloge sprememb neposredno na zasedanju, če ni mogel doseči sporazumnih predlogov sprememb s pristojnim odborom.
It does however not follow the proposal as far as the possibility for the committee asked for an opinion is concerned to present amendments directly to the plenary when joint compromise amendments with the committee responsible cannot be reached.
Ta točka namreč temelji na domnevi, da bo že možnost, da lahko odbor, zaprošen za mnenje, vloži takšne predloge sprememb kot zadnji izhod, prispevala k obojestranskemu interesu za resnično sodelovanje in tako ne bo vodila k večjemu številu predlogov sprememb v Parlamentu.
This element of the proposal is based on the assumption that the mere possibility of such amendments tabled by the committee asked for an opinion as a "last resort" will create a mutual interest in genuine cooperation and thus not lead to more amendments in Parliament.
Poročevalec je v dvomih glede te domneve.
Your rapporteur is sceptical with regard to such an assumption.
Ne smemo namreč pozabiti, da so lahko še približno pred desetimi leti vsi odbori vlagali predloge sprememb za obravnavo v Parlamentu.
It has to be kept in mind here that until about ten years ago all committees could table amendments for consideration in Parliament.
V praksi je to pomenilo, da so odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje, predloge sprememb, ki niso bili sprejeti v pristojnem odboru, sistematično znova vlagali neposredno na zasedanju.
This had in practice as a result that the committees asked for an opinion systematically tabled amendments once again directly in plenary when they were not taken on board by the committee responsible.
S tem, ko je bila pristojnemu odboru prepuščena zadnja odločitev, je nastal filter, ki preprečuje preveliko število predlogov sprememb na zasedanju.
Giving the committee responsible the last say was thus meant as a filter protecting the plenary against too high numbers of amendments.
Če res obstajajo nepremostljive razlike med stališči odborov, ki sodelujejo v postopku okrepljenega sodelovanja, morajo predloge sprememb, ki jih vloži eden ali drugi, tako ali tako podpreti glavne politične skupine, da bi bili sprejeti.
If there are really unbridgeable differences between the approaches taken by committees involved in a procedure of enhanced cooperation, the amendments tabled by one or the other need to secure the support of major political groups anyway in order to be adopted.
V takšnih primerih je samoumevno, da morajo politične skupine poiskati način za dosego soglasja.
It is thus in such situations the natural task of the political groups to find ways to build the necessary consensus.
Sicer pa je mogoče takšne zaplete večinoma preprečiti, če sodelujoči predsedniki odborov in poročevalci prevzamejo vodilno vlogo in polno sodelujejo.
Such situations can however be avoided to a great deal if the chairpersons and rapporteurs involved play their role of leadership and cooperate fully.
Osnutek poročila tudi ne vključuje predloga spremembe 1 iz predloga g.
This draft report does not contain either amendment 1 of Mr. Daul's proposal introducing a deadline into Rule 46 for committees wishing to be asked for an opinion.
V skladu s členom 179(2) je treba vprašanje glede pristojnosti posredovati konferenci predsednikov „v štirih delovnih tednih od razglasitve predložitve odboru v Parlamentu“.
For, pursuant to Rule 179(2) a question of competence has to be referred to the Conference of Presidents "within four weeks of the announcement in Parliament of referral to committee".
Iz te formulacije je mogoče razbrati, da morajo odbori pravočasno posredovati zahteve za vključitev med odbore, zaprošene za mnenje, ali – po analogiji – za sodelovanje v postopku okrepljenega sodelovanja, da bi lahko spoštovali ta rok.
It can be taken from this formulation that requests to be involved as a committee asked for an opinion or, by analogy, to be associated in an enhanced cooperation, have to be made in time to meet this deadline.
Podobna obrazložitev velja za predlog spremembe 3, ki konferenco predsednikov zavezuje, da v roku šestih tednov odloči glede zahtev za vključitev v postopek okrepljenega sodelovanja.
A similar reasoning applies to amendment 3 of the proposal obliging the Conference of Presidents to decide within six weeks on requests for being associated in an enhanced cooperation.
Če se takšna zahteva obravnava kot neke vrste „spor glede pristojnosti dveh ali več stalnih odborov“ v smislu člena 179(2), kar se zdi edino smiselno, velja rok, predviden v tej določbi, tako da poseben rok prav tako ni potreben.
If such a request is considered as a type of "conflict over the competence of two or more standing committees" within the meaning of Rule 179(2), which seems only reasonable, the deadline foreseen in this provision applies and a specific deadline is not necessary either.
PREDLOG SPREMEMBE POSLOVNIKA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA B6‑0461/2006
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF PARLIAMENT'S RULES OF PROCEDURE ( B6-0461/2006 )