natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the national authority which issued the licences, qualifications and diplomas is the only one that can withdraw them.
Only the national authority which issued licences, qualifications and certificates can withdraw them.
However, the national authority of the member state in which the controller is working is responsible for maintaining his qualifications and diplomas and may also suspends them provisionally.
However, the national authority of the Member State in which a controller is working is responsible for maintaining these qualifications and certificates and may also suspend them provisionally.
Transitional provisions applicable to current license holders
Transitional provisions applicable to current licence holders
the conditions required with regard to age and training to enter the profession and the requirement to have completed registered initial training are not applicable to current license holders.
The conditions on age and training required for entry into the profession and the requirement to have completed approved initial training do not apply to current licence holders.
Abolition of superfluous provisions concerning accountancy or off training providers
Abolition of superfluous provisions concerning accounting management of training providers
the provisions of article 11 of the Commission proposal comes so on the financial management off training providers and were considered excessive and superfluous by both the Council and Parliament and have not been included in the text of the common position.
The provisions of Article 11 of the Commission proposal concerning the accounting management of training providers were considered excessive and superfluous by both the Council and Parliament and have not been included in the text of the common position.
The reporter recognises that the Council common position to clarify is the proposal and that the changes to it have not changed the objectives or the spirit of the proposal of adopted at first reading.
The rapporteur recognises that the Council common position clarifies the proposal and that the changes to it have not changed the objectives or the spirit of the proposal adopted at first reading.
He therefore recommends that to be adopted without amendment at second reading.
She therefore recommends that it be adopted without amendment at second reading.
Skupno stališče Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o licencah za kontrolo zračnega prometa v Skupnosti
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community Air Traffic Controller Licence
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o popravku Uredbe (ES) št. 1786/2003 o skupni ureditvi trga za posušeno krmo
on the proposal for a Council regulation correcting Regulation (EC) No 1786/2003 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder
(Poenostavljeni postopek, člen 43(1) Poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure, Rule 43, paragraph 1, of the Rules of Procedure)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0572 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0572 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 36 in 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0410/2005 ),
– having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0410/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 51 in 43(1) Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 51 and Rule 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6‑0008/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0008/2006 ),
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o popravku Uredbe (ES) št. 1786/2003 o skupni ureditvi trga za posušeno krmo
Proposal for a Council regulation correcting Regulation (EC) No 1786/2003 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder
o reformi državnih pomoči 2005–2009
on State aid reform 2005-2009
MNENJE odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................16
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ......................................16
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Akcijski načrt državnih pomoči - Manjša in bolje usmerjena državna pomoč: časovni načrt za reformo državnih pomoči 2005-2009 ( KOM(2005)0107 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication, State Aid Action Plan - less and better targeted State aid: a roadmap for State aid reform 2005-2009 ( COM(2005)0107 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije: Dokument o posvetovanju o državni pomoči za inovacije ( KOM(2005)0436 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication, consultation document on State aid for innovation ( COM(2005)0436 ),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka odločbe Komisije z dne 18. februarja 2004 o uporabi člena 86 (2) Pogodbe za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, v različici, kot je bila za pripravo mnenja posredovana Parlamentu dne 8. septembra 2004
– having regard to the Commission's draft decision of 18 February 2004 on the application of Article 86(2) of the Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest, in the version as forwarded to the Parliament for an opinion on 8 September 2004
Zdaj Odločba Komisije z dne 28. novembra 2005, UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str.
Now Commission Decision of 28 November 2005, OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju osnutka direktive Komisije o spremembah Direktive 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji z dne 18. februarja 2004, kot je bil za pripravo mnenja posredovan Evropskemu parlamentu dne 8. septembra 2004
– having regard to the Commission's draft directive of 18 February 2004, amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings, in the version as forwarded to the Parliament for an opinion on 8 September 2004
Zdaj Direktiva Komisije 2005/81/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o spremembah Direktive 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji in o finančni preglednosti v nekaterih podjetjih, UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str.
Now Commission Directive 2005/81/EC of 28 November 2005 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings, OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o okviru Skupnosti za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestil za javne storitve v različici, kot je bila za pripravo mnenja posredovana Parlamentu dne 8. septembra 2004,
– having regard to the Commission's working paper on a Community framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation, in the version as forwarded to the Parliament for an opinion on 8 September 2004,
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporočila Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2005 o smernicah za državno regionalno pomoč v obdobju 2007–2013,
– having regard to the Commission's draft communication of 21 December 2005, guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013,
– ob upoštevanju ciljev lizbonske strategije,
– having regard to the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Barceloni 15. in 16. marca 2002 ter v Göteborgu 15. in 16. junija 2001, zlasti določb, s katerimi so države članice sporazumno sklenile zmanjšati državno pomoč v Evropski uniji in jo nameniti horizontalnim ciljem skupnega interesa,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Barcelona European Council of 15 and 16 March 2002 and the Gothenburg European Council of 15 and 16 June 2001, and in particular the provisions under which the Member States agreed to reduce the level of State aid in the EU and to redirect it towards horizontal objectives of common interest,
– ob upoštevanju prejšnjih resolucij o storitvah splošnega pomena, še zlasti resolucij z dne 17. decembra 1997 o sporočilu Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropi
– having regard to its previous resolutions on services of general interest, in particular to that of 17 December 1997 on the Commission communication on services of general interest in Europe"
74. , z dne 18. maja 2000 o osnutku direktive Komisije o spremembah Direktive 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji
74. , that of 18 May 2000 on the draft directive amending Commission Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings
238. , z dne 13. novembra 2001 o sporočilu Komisije „Storitve splošnega pomena v Evropi“
238. , that of 13 November 2001 on the Commission communication 'Services of General Interest in Europe'
153. , z dne 14. januarja 2004 o zeleni knjigi o storitvah splošnega pomena
153. , that of 14 January 2004 on the Green Paper on services of general interest
294. in z dne 22. februarja 2005 o državni pomoči v obliki nadomestil javnih storitev
294. , and that of 22 February 2005 on State aid in the form of public service compensation
UL C 301 E, 1.12.2005, str.
OJ C 301 E, 1.12.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri de minimis pomoči
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid
– ob upoštevanju členov I-3, I-5, II-96, III-122, III-166, III-167 in III-238 Pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo, ki so jo države članice podpisale 29. oktobra 2004 v Rimu,
– having regard to Articles I-3, I-5, II-96, III-122, III-166, III-167 and III-238 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, as signed by Member States in Rome on 29 October 2004,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0009/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0009/2006 ),
A. ker mora biti državna pomoč preprosta, transparentna in učinkovita,
A. whereas State aid provisions should be simple, transparent and effective,
B. ker je tržno gospodarstvo najučinkovitejši način za razporejanje omejenih sredstev, ker mora biti zato državna pomoč „skrajno sredstvo“,
B. whereas the market economy is the most efficient way of allocating limited resources; whereas State aid should therefore be an instrument 'of last resort',
C. ker morajo biti cilji državne pomoči vedno jasno opredeljeni, pomoč pa sorazmerna in predvsem začasna,
C. whereas State aid should always have clearly defined objectives, be proportionate and, in particular, be granted on a temporary basis,
D. ker skupni letni znesek državne pomoči v Evropski uniji tudi po najskromnejših ocenah presega 50 odstotkov letnega proračuna EU, ker se obseg državne pomoči v razmerju do BDP po državah članicah zelo razlikuje, –leta 2003 je znašal od 0,10 do 2,76 odstotka domačega bruto proizvoda– kar lahko povzroči precejšnje izkrivljanje trga,
D. whereas the total amount of State aid granted each year in the EU is the equivalent of more than 50% of the EU's annual budget even by the most conservative estimates; whereas the amount of State aid, as a proportion of GDP, varies substantially between Member States, ranging from 0.10% to 2.76% in 2003, thereby potentially causing considerable market distortion,
E. ker so vir državne pomoči davkoplačevalci in jo je zato treba porabiti odgovorno in stroškovno učinkovito,
E. whereas State aid is funded by taxpayers and must therefore be spent responsibly, providing high cost-effectiveness,
F. ker je treba merila za upravičenost do državne pomoči pregledovati redno in v ustreznih časovnih intervalih, ker se redno spremljanje in revizija porabe državne pomoči ne smeta prenesti na nacionalne urade držav članic za revizijo,
F. whereas the justification for granting State aid should be reviewed at regular and appropriate intervals; whereas the task of regularly monitoring and auditing the use of State aid should not be delegated to the national audit offices of the Member States,
G. ker je učinkovit in strog nadzor nad podeljevanjem državne pomoči nujen za zagotavljanje poštene konkurence in transparentnosti ter preprečevanje diskriminacije,
G. whereas effective and stringent controls over the grant of State aid are required in order to ensure fair competition and transparency and in order to avoid discrimination,
H. ker se mora Komisija pri uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti osredotočiti na kršitve, ki imajo velik vpliv na notranji trg, saj je, kot določa člen 87 Pogodbe, državna pomoč nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom le „kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami.“,
H. whereas, when applying the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, the Commission should focus on infringements with a significant impact on the internal market because State aid is incompatible with the common market pursuant to Article 87 of the Treaty only ‘in so far as it affects trade between Member States...’,
I. ker je učinkovitost nadzora nad državno pomočjo odvisna od boljše obveščenosti vpletenih strani o njenih posledicah zanje,
I. whereas the effectiveness of State aid control policy depends on better information regarding its implications for the parties concerned,
J. ker lahko koristi državne pomoči bistveno presegajo stroške, če se državna pomoč uporablja racionalno in na podlagi opravljenih analiz stroškov in koristi,
J. whereas the benefits of the use of State aid can considerably exceed the costs where State subsidy is used rationally and thorough cost-benefit analyses are conducted,
K. ker v državah članicah ne obstaja mehanizem za spremljanje, ki bi bil primerljiv z nadzorom nad pomočjo na ravni Skupnosti,
K. whereas no monitoring mechanism comparable to Community-level aid supervision exists within the Member States,
L. ker se Parlament v svojih prejšnjih resolucijah o državni pomoči in v rednih razpravah, ki potekajo s predstavniki Komisije v Odboru za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, vedno znova zavzema za ukrepe, ki bi zagotovili večjo transparentnost,
L. whereas the Parliament, in its previous resolutions on State aid and in its regular debates with Commission representatives within the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, has repeatedly insisted on measures to ensure more transparency,
6. predlaga, da Komisija čim bolj dosledno objavlja smernice za razlage sodb Sodišča o pravilih državne pomoči, če te temeljijo na določbah Pogodbe ali pa na določbah sekundarne zakonodaje;
Suggests that the Commission should publish, as consistently as possible, interpretative guidelines on Court of Justice judgments on State aid rules, whether these are based on Treaty provisions or on provisions contained in secondary legislation;
Boljši gospodarski pristop
Stronger economic approach
17. opozarja na morebitno škodljivo vlogo državne pomoči, če ta spodbudi selitve potencialnih podjetij - prejemnikov med državami članicami zaradi tekmovanja podjetij za subvencije, ne da bi to pomenilo resnično korist za skupne cilje EU;
Warns against the potentially harmful role of State aid in motivating the relocation of potential beneficiary undertakings between Member States, due to "subsidy-shopping" by enterprises, without any real benefit in respect of the common goals of the EU;
Inovacije, razvoj in raziskave
Innovation and R&D
20. podpira prilagodljivost državne pomoči pri ustvarjanju in spodbujanju inovativnih zamisli v raziskovalnih ustanovah v javnem sektorju in na univerzah, pa tudi jasna in preprosta pravila za prenos takšnih zamisli in strokovnega znanja v gospodarstvo; v zvezi s tem podpira razvoj novih inovacij z javno-zasebnim sodelovanjem in partnerstvi;
Is very supportive of State aid flexibility concerning the creation and promotion of innovative ideas in public sector research bodies and universities, as well as clear and simple rules on how to transfer such ideas and expertise to businesses; in this regard, supports the generation of further innovation through public-private collaboration and partnerships;
23. ocenjuje, da zaradi pomanjkljive zakonodaje in davčnih sistemov, ki ne spodbujajo podjetništva, v nekaterih državah članicah rizični kapital ni dovolj dostopen, zlasti ne za mala podjetja, zato odobrava revizijo sporočila Komisije o državni pomoči in rizičnem kapitalu
Considers that, due to regulatory insufficiencies and incentive-poor tax systems in some Member States, the provision of risk capital, in particular to small businesses, is not optimal; welcomes, therefore, the revision of the Commission communication on State aid and risk capital
UL C 235, 21.8.2001, str.
OJ C 235, 21.8.2001, p.
26. poziva Komisijo, da končno zagotovi pravno jasnost glede pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena;
Calls on the Commission finally to ensure legal clarity as regards aid for services of general economic interest;
28. obžaluje, da še vedno obstajajo velike razlike, kako si bo Komisija v praksi razlagala preskus iz sodbe Sodišča v primeru Altmark ; poziva Komisijo, da izda jasno in natančno razlago četrtega merila iz sodbe v primeru Altmark ;
Regrets that there are still great differences between how the Commission intends to interpret the test in the Court of Justice's Altmark judgment in practice; calls on the Commission to issue a clear and precise interpretative communication on the fourth criterion set out in the Altmark judgment;
30. ugotavlja, da so manjša podjetja za javne storitve izvzeta iz pravil o državni pomoči; ter se sprašuje, ali je razlikovanje med majhnimi in velikimi podjetji pri presoji pravil o državni pomoči ustrezno; zato se zavzema, da bi presoja Komisije temeljila na učinkih državne pomoči na zadevnem trgu, ne pa na velikosti podjetja za javne storitve;
Notes the exemption of smaller public service companies from the application of the State aid rules; wonders, however, whether the distinction between small and large undertakings in the assessment of State aid rules is adequate; pleads, therefore, for the Commission's assessment to be based on the effects of State aid measures on the relevant market rather than on the size of the public service company involved;
Skupinske izjeme
Block exemptions
33. pozdravlja predlog za zvišanje praga de minimis ; predlaga podvojitev zneska na 200 000 EUR; v zvezi s tem prosi Komisijo, naj se posveti nadzoru kumulacije različnih pomoči;
Welcomes the proposal to raise the de minimis threshold; suggests that the figure be doubled, to € 200 000; asks the Commission in this context to address the problem of cumulation control;
36. meni, da bi morali pregledati zmanjšanja državne pomoči za regije s „statističnim učinkom“, katerih dohodek se je zaradi širitve sicer relativno povečal, dejansko pa niso dosegle rasti ali zbliževanja ter so obremenjene z visoko stopnjo nezaposlenosti;
Considers that there should be a review of the reductions in State aid to the "statistical effect" regions, which have benefited from a relative increase in income as a result of enlargement but which have not achieved real growth or convergence and which suffer a high unemployment rate;
38. spodbuja Komisijo, naj v skladu z lizbonsko in göteborško strategijo bolj poglobljeno in natančneje oceni različne vrste državnih pomoči in njihovo učinkovitost ter tako ugotovi, ali so katere od njih koristnejše za regionalni razvoj kot druge z vidika njihovega morebitnega trajnega in pozitivnega učinka;
Encourages the Commission, in line with the Lisbon and Gothenburg strategies, to assess in greater depth and detail the different types of State aid and their effectiveness so that it can indicate whether certain forms of aid are more advantageous than others as regards any lasting, positive impact they may have on regional development;
Okoljska pomoč
Environmental aid
Odstavek 4.2.3. ;
Paragraph 4.2.3. ;
Boljše upravljanje
Better governance
45. odločno podpira zamisel o vzpostavitvi tesnejše mreže nadzornih organov, kot so na primer računska sodišča, v državah članicah, s čimer bi zagotovili večjo doslednost pri izvajanju pravil za državno pomoč;
Strongly supports the idea of forming a closer network of supervisory authorities, such as courts of auditors, in the Member States, which could facilitate the objective of consistency in the application of State aid rules;
48. izraža nezadovoljstvo, da se trenutno kazni za nepriglasitev izrekajo samo prejemnikom pomoči, državam članicam pa ne; zato podpira Komisijo pri raziskovanju novih mehanizmov za preprečevanje, ki bi obravnavali nepravilno izvajanje pravil za državno pomoč držav članic, in poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za ustrezne sankcije v zvezi s tem;
Expresses its discontent that sanctions for non-notification are currently enforced only against beneficiaries and not against Member States; supports the Commission, therefore, in exploring new deterrent mechanisms with a view addressing the incorrect implementation of the State aid rules by Member States, and invites the Commission to provide for appropriate sanctions in this regard;
MNENJE odbora za regionalni razvoj
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development
Odbor za regionalni razvoj poziva Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
6. v zvezi s tem upošteva namen Komisije, da dvigne prag de minimis z obstoječih 100 000 EUR in priporoča reformo pravila o kumulaciji;
Notes, in this context, the Commission's intention to increase the de minimis threshold from the current level of EUR 100 000 and recommends the reform of the cumulation rule;
9. ob upoštevanju vedno večjega pomena javno-zasebnih partnerstev za gradnjo infrastrukture v slabše razvitih regijah poziva Komisijo, naj podeljevanju državne pomoči tovrstnim partnerstvom posveti posebno pozornost ter poskrbi za pravno svetovanje o vseh vprašanjih v zvezi z uporabo pravil o državni pomoči na tem področju, še zlasti pa poziva, da se z ustreznimi pravili poenostavi uporaba javno-zasebnih partnerstev; predlaga, da bi bilo treba s tem v zvezi zlasti poskrbeti, da se zagotovi ohranjanje transparentnosti;
Asks the Commission, given the increasing importance of public-private partnerships for building infrastructures in less-developed regions, to pay particular attention to the issue of State aid provision for public-private partnerships and, thereby, provide legal guidance on all issues regarding the applicability of State aid rules in this context and calls in particular for appropriate rules to simplify the use of public-private partnerships; submits that special care should be taken in this connection to ensure that transparency is maintained;
Reforma državnih pomoči 2005–2009
State aid reform 2005-2009
Mnenje odbora Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Opinion by Date announced in plenary
Reforma državnih pomoči 2005–2009
State Aid Reform 2005-2009
Odbor(-i), zaprošen(-i) zamnenje Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
Odbor(-i), ki niso dal(-i) mnenja Date of decision
Not delivering opinion(s) Date of decision
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3181/78 in Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1736/79 na področju monetarne politike
on the proposal for a Council Regulation repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3181/78 and Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/79 in the area of Monetary Policy
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0611 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0611 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 308 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0010/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0010/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 51 in člena 43(1) Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,