natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sporočilo poudarja, da je raven inovacij v Evropi pogosto manjša zaradi neuspehov na trgu, kot so zunanji dejavniki, nezadostno razširjanje informacij, pomanjkljivosti na kapitalskih trgih, neusklajenosti na trgu dela, nezadostno usklajevanje politike za R&R itd.
The Communication stresses that the level of innovation in Europe is sub-optimal, often due to market failures such as externalities, insufficient dissemination of information, shortcomings in the capital markets, mismatches on the labour market, insufficient R&D policy coordination etc.
Komisija zato razmišlja o tem, da bi dovolila državne pomoči za tehnološke inovacije za mala in srednje velika podjetja, kadar izpolnjuje jasna predhodna pravila na osnovi naslednjega „splošnega preskusa usklajevanja“: (1) prisotnost natančno opredeljenega neuspeha na trgu; (2) državna pomoč kot najustreznejši instrument politike, tj. ki izpolnjuje zahteve dopolnjevanja in sorazmernosti; in (3) ravnovesje, ki ga je treba vzpostaviti med izkrivljajočim učinkom državne pomoči in varovanjem splošnega interesa.
The Commission therefore considers allowing State aid for technological innovation to SMEs when it fulfils clear ex ante rules designed on the basis of the following 'general balancing test': (1) presence of a well-defined market failure; (2) State aid to be the most appropriate policy instrument, i.e. fulfilling the requirements of additionality and proportionality; and (3) balance to be struck between the distorting effect of the State aid measure and safeguarding the general interest.
Cilj Komisije je vključevanje niza konkretnih in usmerjenih dejavnosti, povezanih z inovacijami, v obstoječe pravne instrumente državne pomoči EU, in sicer:
The Commission's objective is to incorporate into the existing EU state aid legal instruments a series of concrete and targeted innovation-related activities, namely:
· dejavnosti, ki podpirajo tveganja in eksperimentiranje ter pomagajo premostiti vrzel med tehničnim znanjem in trgom, kot so: podpora ustanavljanja in rasti inovativnih novoustanovljenih podjetij; obravnavanje vrzeli lastniškega kapitala za večje zagotavljanje rizičnega kapitala v EU; ter podpora tehnološkemu eksperimentiranju in tveganja uvedbe inovativnih izdelkov;
· Activities which support risk-taking and experimentation and help to bridge the gap between technical knowledge and the market, such as: supporting the creation and growth of innovative start-ups; tackling the equity gap to increase risk capital in the EU; and supporting technological experimentation and risk of launching innovative products;
· dejavnosti (poslovne storitve in infrastruktura), ki izboljšujejo splošno poslovno okolje za inovacije, kot so: spodbujanje posrednikov za inovacije; spodbujanje usposabljanja in mobilnosti; in podpora razvoja centrov odličnosti s sodelovanjem in povezovanjem.
· Activities (business services and infrastructure) which improve the general business environment for innovation, such as: encouraging innovation intermediaries; encouraging training and mobility; and supporting the development of poles of excellence through collaboration and clustering.
Poročevalka pozdravlja pristop Komisij „manjše in bolje usmerjene državne pomoči“ in podpira zavezanost za njeno prerazporeditev v korist horizontalnih ciljev, kot so raziskave, inovacije in optimizacija človeškega kapitala.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission approach of 'less and better-targeted State aid' and supports the commitment of its redeployment in favour of horizontal objectives, such as research, innovation and optimisation of human capital.
V vsakem primeru, tudi takrat, ko so rešene težave z nezadostnimi inovacijami v Evropi, je treba dati prednost izboljšanju konkurence, državna pomoč pa mora biti „zadnje sredstvo“.
In any case, even when resolving the problem of unsatisfactory innovation in Europe, the enhancement of competition should be given the first priority and state aid should be an 'instrument of last resort'.
Sporočilo Komisije „Proaktivna politika konkurence za Evropo“ poudarja, da države članice pogosto neučinkovito subvencionirajo industrije in neustrezno obravnavajo neuspehe inovacij na trgu.
The Commission Communication 'A Pro-active Competition Policy for Europe' points out that Member States often subsidise industries in an inefficient manner, and do not sufficiently address innovation market failure.
Zato morajo pravila državne pomoči zagotoviti zaščitne ukrepe, da državna pomoč ne ustvarja izgub, saj jo vedno financirajo davkoplačevalci, in jo je treba odgovorno porabljati ob zagotavljanju visoke vrednosti denarja.
Therefore state aid rules should provide for safeguards that state aid is not loss-making for the Member States, as it is always funded by taxpayers and must be spent responsibly providing high value for money.
Mnoge težave na področju inovacij vsekakor zahtevajo celovitejši politični pristop v zvezi z optimizacijo poslovnega okolja z ukrepi, kot so: odprava birokracije, naložbe v izobraževanje in usposabljanje, visokokakovostna infrastruktura, patentni režim, ki je naklonjen inovacijam, dostop do rizičnega kapitala, spodbujanje podjetniškega duha, odstranjevanje ovir za svobodo gibanja delavcev in raziskovalcev v EU ter sprejetje skupne politike zakonitega priseljevanja, ki Evropi omogoča pritegniti najboljše in najpametnejše.
Indeed, many problems in the field of innovation require a more comprehensive policy approach related to optimising of the business environment by measure, such as: cutting the 'red tape', investing in education and training, high quality infrastructure, a patent regime conducive to innovation, access to risk capital, encouraging entrepreneurial spirit, removing obstacles to free movement of workers and researchers within the EU, and adopting a common policy for legal immigration that enables Europe to attract the best and the brightest.
Razen tega morajo države članice okrepiti svoja prizadevanja za izpolnitev cilja 3 % naložbe v R&R v skladu z lizbonskimi cilji.
Moreover, the Member States should step up their efforts to meet the target of 3 % investment in R&D in line with the Lisbon objectives.
Pravila državne pomoči EU za inovacije morajo nedvomno upoštevati mednarodni okvir in dejstvo, da EU zaostaja za svojimi svetovnimi konkurenti, kar zadeva naložbe v R&R ter splošno rast produktivnosti (glej sliko 1).
Unquestionably the EU state aid rules for innovation should take into account the international context and the fact that the EU is lagging behind its global competitors, both in terms of investing in R&D and in generating productivity growth (see Fig.
V tem pogledu morajo države članice razviti splošne strategije z merljivimi cilji v zvezi s svojim inovacijskimi politikami, kjer je treba sistematično izvesti primerjalna merila in oceno učinkovitosti pristopov upravljanja.
In this respect, Member States should develop overall strategies with quantifiable targets as regards their innovation policies where benchmarking, impact assessment and evaluation of effectiveness of governance approaches should be systematically performed.
Slika 1: Inovacijska vrzel EU z ZDA in Japonsko
Figure 1: EU innovation gap with US and Japan
Inovacijska vrzel EU25 proti ZDA, Japonski in EU15
EU25 innovation gap towards US, Japan and EU15
EU25 enaka 0.00
EU25 equal to 0.00
V skladu s primerljivimi podatki za 16 kazalcev
Based on a set of comparable data for 16 indicators
1 ZDA in Japonska še vedno zelo prehitevata EU25.
1 , the US and Japan are still far ahead of the EU25.
Inovacijska vrzel med EU25 in ZDA je skoraj stalna.
The innovation gap between the EU25 and the US is close to stable.
Vir: Načrt trenda – Inovacijska politika v Evropi.
Source: Trend Chart - Innovation Policy in Europe .
Načela, ki urejajo nadzor državne pomoči za inovacije
Principles governing control of State aid for innovation
Poročevalka se strinja s pristopom Komisije, da ne oblikuje ločenega okvira za inovacije in da omeji spremembe obstoječih pravnih instrumentov, da se omeji tveganje pravne negotovosti in birokracije.
The rapporteur agrees with the Commission approach not to create a separate Framework for innovation and to restrict changes to the existing legal instruments in order to limit the risk of legal uncertainty and 'red tape'.
Uporaba ekonomskega pristopa k državni pomoči za inovacije na osnovi predhodnih pravil se lahko obravnava kot primerna, če je pregledna, nediskriminacijska in zagotavlja pravno varnost.
Applying an economic approach to State aid for innovation based on ex ante rules may be considered appropriate if transparent, non-discriminating and providing for legal certainty.
Komisija mora v tesnem sodelovanju z Evropskim parlamentom izvesti redni pregled, nadzor in oceno učinkovitosti teh pravil.
The Commission, in close cooperation with the European Parliament, should carry a periodical review, control and evaluation of the effectiveness of these rules.
Če je dovoljeno, mora biti državna pomoč za inovacije začasna, sorazmerna, strogo in učinkovito nadzorovana ter predmet občasnih presoj vpliva s predhodnimi analizami, ki jih izvajajo države članice in Komisija.
If allowed, State aid for innovation should be of a temporary nature, proportionate, strictly and effectively controlled, and subjected to periodic impact assessment through ex-post analyses conducted by Member States and the Commission.
Poročevalka predlaga, da se izraz „neuspeh na trgu“ nadomesti z „neučinkovitostjo na trgu“.
The rapporteur recommends the term 'market failure' to be replaced by 'market inefficiency'.
Komisija mora obravnavati izdelavo temeljite metodologije za oceno neučinkovitosti inovacij na trgu na osnovi jasnega in operativnega niza kazalcev.
The Commission should consider elaborating a sound methodology for assessing innovation market inefficiency, based on a clear and operational set of indicators.
Razen tega je treba analizirati neučinkovitost na trgu v širšem smislu členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe ES.
Moreover innovation market inefficiency should be analysed in a wider context of Article 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty.
Države članice morajo za razvoj temeljite metodologije za oceno ustreznosti predhodnih pravil zagotoviti zanesljive statistične podatke o trgu in neučinkovitostih državne pomoči.
For the purpose of developing a sound methodology on assessing the adequacy of ex ante rules, Member States should provide reliable statistical data on both market and State aid inefficiencies.
Poročevalka se strinja s sklepom Komisije, da tržne neučinkovitosti najbolj vplivajo na mala in srednja podjetja in novoustanovljena podjetja ter da je državna pomoč manj izkrivljajoča, kadar je dodeljena dejavnostim, ki so oddaljene od trga, ali malim in srednje velikim podjetjem ter novoustanovljenim podjetjem.
The rapporteur agrees with the conclusion of the Commission that SMEs and start-ups are most affected by market inefficiencies, and that State aid is less distorting when granted for activities at a distance from the market or to SMEs and start-ups.
Kljub temu lahko predhodna pravila veljajo tudi za velika podjetja, ampak le v primeru sodelovanja z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji v skupinah in centrih odličnosti ter če so izpolnjena oblikovana predhodna merila.
Nevertheless the ex ante rules may apply to large companies as well but only in case of cooperation with SMEs in clusters and poles of excellence and if the designed ex ante criteria are met.
Z upoštevanjem možnosti za finančno podporo inovativnim dejavnostim na evropski, nacionalni in regionalni ravni ter različnih instrumentih, s katerimi razpolagajo države članice za spodbujanje inovacij, poročevalka verjame, da se je treba nepovratnim sredstvom izogibati, kadar je to mogoče.
Given the different opportunities for financial support to innovation activities on European, national and regional level as well as the variety the instruments that Member States have at their disposal for encouraging innovation, that rapporteur believes that direct grant should be avoided whenever possible.
Poročevalka bi želela poudariti, da razlikovanje med tehnološkimi in netehnološkimi dejavnostmi ne more biti ustrezno za opredelitev inovacij, ker „tehnologija“ na eni strani ne pomeni nujno učinkovitih inovacij in je „netehnološki“ pristop, na drugi strani, lahko prav tako inovativen.
The rapporteur would like to stress that the distinction between technological and non-technological activities cannot be adequate for defining innovation as, on one hand, 'technology' does not always necessarily mean effective innovation and on the other 'non-technological' approach could also be innovative.
Zato mora Komisija na osnovi opredelitve oblikovati merila, ki razlikujejo med običajnimi vsakodnevnimi dejavnostmi podjetij in njihovimi inovativnimi dejavnostmi.
Therefore the Commission should elaborate on a definition based on criteria that distinguish between the regular day-to-day operations of the companies and their innovation activities.
Inovativni projekti lahko dokažejo upravičenost do državne pomoči, kadar:
Innovative projects could prove eligible for State aid when:
ü ustvarijo dodatno ali novo korist za stranko;
ü they create an additional or new benefit for the client;
ü morajo predstaviti tveganje, če so dejanske inovacije običajno povezane z določeno stopnjo negotovosti naložbe;
ü they have to present a risk as real innovation is usually related to certain degree of uncertainty in the investment;
ü so inovacije, ki jih ustvarijo, prenosljive (tj. formalizirane z licencami, avtorskimi pravicami itd);
ü the innovation they create is transmissible (i.e. it is formalised via licences, copyrights, etc.);
ü ustvarjajo pozitivne zunanje dejavnike;
ü they create positive externalities;
Komisija preučuje, ali naj nadaljuje uporabo zdajšnjih dodatnih sredstev za regije, če se državna pomoč, dovoljena za inovacije, običajno lahko združuje z regionalno pomočjo, ker vsaka velja za različne upravičene stroške.
The Commission is considering if to continue applying the currently existing regional bonuses given that State aid allowed for innovation may normally be cumulated with regional aid since each relates to different eligible costs.
Poročevalka se strinja, da je pomanjkanje inovacij ter R&R ena od pomembnih značilnosti regij, ki potrebujejo kohezijsko pomoč.
The rapporteur agrees that the lack of innovation and R&D is one of the major characteristics of regions in need of cohesion aid.
Vendar so dodatna sredstva za regije neprimerna, če je dovoljena kumulacija državnih pomoči.
However, the regional bonuses are inappropriate if cumulation of State aids is allowed.
Podpora tveganjem in eksperimentiranju
Support risk-taking and experimentation
Poročevalka pozdravlja ukrepe, ki jih je Komisija predlagala za podporo tveganjem in eksperimentiranju, pri čemer vztraja, da je treba dati prednost tržno usmerjenim rešitvam in uporabi zasebnega kapitala.
The rapporteur welcomes the measures proposed by the Commission for support of risk taking and experimentation while insisting preference to be given to market-driven solutions and the use of private capital.
Nadomestitev opredelitve upravičenih stroškov z enim od inovativnih novoustanovljenih podjetij, kot osnova za dodelitev državne pomoči za inovacije, je v skladu s celotno strategijo bolje usmerjene pomoči ter jo poročevalka podpira.
Replacing the definition of eligible costs with the one of innovative start-ups as a basis for allocating State aid for innovation is in line with the overall strategy of better-targeted State aid and it is supported by the rapporteur.
Vendar je treba zahtevo po obstoju obdobja podaljšati do 8 let za podjetja z daljšimi cikli R&R.
However, the existence period requirement should be extended to eight years for companies with longer R&D cycles.
Zagotavljanje finančne podpore rizičnega kapitala tudi za fazo po zagonu je za mala in srednja podjetja zelo pomembno.
Providing risk capital financial support also for the post-seed phase is of utmost importance for SMEs.
Vendar mora biti pomoč kratkotrajna in mora predvsem dopolnjevati zasebne naložbe.
Nevertheless, the aid should be short-term and complementary to primarily private investments
Podporno poslovno okolje za inovacije
Supportive business environment for innovation
Nujna je nadaljnja pojasnitev pravnega položaja posrednikov za inovacije, zlasti v zvezi s področjem uporabe storitev, ki jih zagotavljajo (tržno/netržno usmerjene dejavnosti), ker je posvetovalni dokument glede njihove opredelitve in statusa zelo neopredeljiv in nejasen.
Further clarification of the legal status of innovative intermediaries is necessary in particular in terms of scope of services they provide (market / non-market oriented activities) since the consultation paper is greatly vague and unclear as regards their definition and status.
Univerze so lahko eden ključnih spodbujevalcev podjetniške kulture in duha.
Universities have the potential to be one of the key promoters of entrepreneurial culture and spirit.
Treba je zmanjšati tradicionalno kulturno vrzel med akademijo in podjetjem, da se ustvari okolje, ki je naklonjeno inovacijam in je privlačno za raziskovalce.
The traditional cultural gap between business and academia should be reduced in order to create an environment conducive to innovation and attractive for researchers.
Za povečanje spodbud za sodelovanje, ki jih je treba povečati, mora Komisija nadalje pojasniti uporabo pravil državne pomoči za univerze in raziskovalne ustanove, kadar se ukvarjajo z gospodarskimi dejavnostmi kot del skupine ali centrov odličnosti.
In order incentives for collaboration to be increased, the Commission should further clarify the application of State aid rules to universities and research establishments when engaged in economic activities as part of cluster or poles of excellence.
Poročevalka izraža dvom o primernosti tega, da se državna pomoč dovoli malim in srednje velikim podjetjem za najemanje visoko usposobljenega osebja, ker imajo lahko dostop do strokovnega znanja in spretnosti prek storitev posrednikov.
The rapporteur is sceptical about the appropriateness of allowing State aid to SMEs for hiring highly qualified staff, as they may have access to specialist knowledge and skills through the services of intermediaries.
Veliko primerov prikazuje, da imajo uspešne skupine organski izvor.
Many examples show that successful clusters originate in organic matter.
Zato morajo biti upravičene do državne pomoči le začasno med začetno fazo, da se uspešno spopadejo z upravnimi ovirami in ovirami za sodelovanje.
Therefore they should be eligible for State aid only on a temporary basis during the start-up phase in order to cope with administrative and cooperation obstacles.
Če so skupine in centri odličnosti subvencionirani, morajo biti predmet rednih pregledov v zvezi z njihovo odličnostjo in prispevanjem k inovacijam.
If subsidised, clusters and poles of excellence should be subject to periodic reviews in terms of their excellence and contribution to innovation.
Visokokakovostna infrastruktura je nujen pogoj za inovacije in razvoj skupin.
High-quality infrastructure is an indispensable precondition for innovation and development of clusters.
Vendar državna pomoč za to infrastrukturo ne sme biti brezpogojna in mora izpolnjevati zahteve tehnološke nevtralnosti in odprtega dostopa, obravnavati ugotovljen neuspeh na trgu in okrepiti inovativni potencial.
However, that State aid for it should not be unconditional and needs to fulfil the requirement of technical neutrality and open access, to address identified market failure and enhances the innovative potential.
o državni pomoči za inovacije
on sectoral aspects of the State Aid Action Plan: aid for innovation
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko poziva Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, da kot pristojni odbor v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. priznava, da je iz tehničnih vzrokov težko oceniti, v kolikšni meri pomanjkljivosti trga vplivajo na netehnološke inovacije; meni pa, da netehnoloških inovacij, zlasti tistih povezanih s storitvami in podjetništvom, zaradi pomembnega deleža, ki ga prispevajo k evropski konkurenčnosti, pod nobenim pogojem ne bi smeli izvzeti iz obsega pravil o državni pomoči za inovacije;
Recognises the technical difficulties in estimating the extent to which non-technological innovations are affected by shortcomings in the market; considers, however, that, in view of the important contribution of non-technological innovation - particularly innovation in services and business - to European competitiveness, it should under no circumstances be excluded from the scope of the rules on State aid for innovation;
7. poudarja, da so potrebna dodatna pojasnila glede uporabe pravil državne pomoči pri mednarodnih čezmejnih gospodarskih dejavnostih podjetij ter raziskovalnih in akademskih ustanov;
Stresses that further clarification is needed on how State aid rules will apply to international cross-border economic activities of companies, research establishments and academic institutions;
11. poudarja, da je državna pomoč drugim podjetjem razen MSP primerna, predvsem če je na nizki stopnji in če se dodeli z namenom povezovanja velikih podjetij okoli centrov odličnosti, spodbujanja sodelovanja z drugimi podjetji, MSP, akademskimi ustanovami v skupinah "odprte inovativnosti" in centri odličnosti, ter z namenom spodbujanja skupnih programov R&R, pod pogojem, da takšna državna pomoč izpolnjuje merila iz predhodnih pravil;
Emphasises that State aid to companies other than SMEs can be appropriate, particularly if it is low-level aid, when granted for the purpose of encouraging networking of large enterprises around poles of excellence, cooperation with other companies, SMEs, academic institutions in ‘open innovation’ and other clusters, and poles of excellence, and to encourage collaborative R&D programmes, provided that such State aid meets the criteria of the ex ante rules;
14. se zaveda, da je dostop do rizičnega kapitala za inovativna MSP trenutno precej omejen, zlasti v začetnih fazah njihovega razvoja; zato podpira zamisel o uporabi državne pomoči za privabljanje zasebnih naložb v regionalne sklade rizičnega kapitala, ki delujejo kot javno-zasebna partnerstva z večjo prožnostjo investicijskih tranš za javne vire;
Realises that innovative SMEs’ access to risk capital is currently considerably limited, primarily in the first phases of their development; supports therefore the idea of using State aid to attract private capital investment to regional risk-capital funds working as public-private partnerships with higher flexibility of investment tranches for public resources;
Državna pomoč za inovacije
State aid for innovation
Državna pomoč za inovacije
on State Aid for innovation
o ukrepih za spodbujanje večjezičnosti in učenja jezikov v EU: Evropski kazalnik jezikovnih kompetenc
on measures to promote multilingualism and language learning in the European Union: European Indicator of Language Competence
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Evropski kazalnik jezikovnih kompetenc" ( KOM(2005)0356 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission concerning a 'European Indicator of Language Competence ( COM(2005)0356 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Nova okvirna strategija za večjezičnost" ( KOM(2005)0596 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission concerning 'A New Framework Strategy for Multilingualism' ( COM(2005)0596 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Spodbujanje učenja jezikov in jezikovne raznolikosti: akcijski načrt" ( KOM(2003)0449 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission on 'Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: an Action Plan 2004-2006' ( COM(2003)0449 ),
– ob upoštevanju programa "Izobraževanje in usposabljanje 2010: uspeh lizbonske strategije je odvisen od nujnih reform (dokument Sveta 6905/04 EDUC 43),
– having regard to the programme for 'Education and Training 2010: the success of the Lisbon Strategy hinges on urgent reforms' (Council document 6905/04 EDUC 43),