natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
c) potrditev načela, da službi Parlamenta in Sveta enakopravno sodelujeta pri pravno-jezikovni reviziji;
(c) confirmation of the principle that, in relation to legal-linguistic revision, Parliament's and the Council's services are to cooperate on an equal footing;
5. je prepričan, da bo revidirana izjava dodatno povečala preglednost in javno odgovornost zakonodajnega dela, začetega v skladu s postopkom soodločanja;
Is convinced that the revised Declaration will further increase the transparency and public accountability of legislative work undertaken pursuant to the codecision procedure;
Osnutek revidirane skupne izjave o praktičnih ukrepih za postopek soodločanja je tretji medinstitucionalni sporazum o tej temi med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo.
The draft revised Joint Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure is the third interinstitutional agreement on this subject between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Zakonodajna vloga Parlamenta se že od začetka veljavnosti enotnega evropskega akta 1. julija 1987, ki je uvedel postopek sodelovanja, stalno krepi, njegov odnos z drugimi institucijami pa postaja vse tesnejši.
Since the entry into force, on 1 July 1987, of the Single European Act, which introduced the cooperation procedure, Parliament’s legislative role has consistently expanded and its relations with the other institutions have become ever closer.
Po uvedbi postopka soodločanja s pogodbo iz Maastrichta leta 1993 je prišlo do dogovora o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu, ki je podrobneje določil delovanje spravnega odbora, vendar ni obravnaval drugih vidikov soodločanja.
Following the introduction of the codecision procedure in the Maastricht Treaty in 1993, an interinstitutional agreement was negotiated, which set out in greater detail the functioning of the Conciliation Committee, but did not cover other aspects of codecision.
Pogodba iz Amsterdama, ki je pričela veljati leta 1999, je dodatno spremenila stanje, saj je zelo povečala število področij, na katerih se uporablja postopek soodločanja, je pa tudi spremenila prvotni postopek soodločanja, zlasti tako, da je predvidela možnost soglasja med Parlamentom in Svetom v prvi obravnavi, pa tudi s poenostavitvijo kasnejših stopenj postopka.
The Amsterdam Treaty, which came into force in 1999, further changed the situation, greatly extending the areas to which the codecision procedure applies as well as reforming the original codecision procedure, in particular by providing for the possibility of agreement between Parliament and Council at first reading, and also by streamlining the later stages of the procedure.
Leta 1999 je bil sklenjen nov medinstitucionalni sporazum, skupna izjava o praktičnih ukrepih za nov postopek soodločanja, kot nadaljevanje pogodbe iz Amsterdama.
As a follow-up to the Amsterdam Treaty, a new interinstitutional agreement, the Joint Declaration on practical arrangements of the new codecision procedure, was concluded in 1999.
Skupna izjava se je izkazala za koristno, vendar so nekatere praktične posledice pri njeni uporabi sčasoma pokazale potrebo po nekaterih spremembah.
The Joint Declaration has proven its worth However, some practical developments in its application over time have shown the need for some amendment.
30. junija 2005 je konferenca predsednikov imenovala pet poslancev Evropskega parlamenta (Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Antonios Trakatellis, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Joseph Daul in Jo Leinen), za zastopanje Parlamenta na pogajanjih o spremembi skupne izjave o praktičnih ukrepih za postopek soodločanja.
On 30 June 2005, the Conference of Presidents appointed five Members of the European Parliament - Mr Vidal-Quadras, Mr Trakatellis, Ms Roth-Behrendt, Mr Daul and Mr Leinen - to represent Parliament in negotiations on the amendment of the Joint Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure.
Revizija v obliki niza srečanj na politični in upravni ravni med tremi institucijami, se je začela decembra 2005.
A revision exercise, in the form of a series of meetings at political and administrative level between the three institutions, began in December 2005.
Stališči Sveta in Komisije sta se znatno spremenili, kar je omogočilo sklenitev kompromisa s Parlamentom.
The positions of both the Council and Commission evolved considerably and allowed for a compromise to be reached with Parliament.
Končni sporazum je bil dosežen decembra 2006, konferenca predsednikov pa ga je odobrila na svoji seji 8. marca 2007.
Final agreement was reached on 13 December 2006 and endorsed by the Conference of Presidents at its meeting on 8 March 2007.
Predlagana revidirana izjava bo izboljšala delovanje soodločanja in pripomogla k temu, da bo prihodnje medinstitucionalno sodelovanje tvorno in prilagodljivo.
The proposed revised Declaration will improve the functioning of codecision and help to facilitate future interinstitutional cooperation in a constructive and flexible way.
Besedilo izjave je bilo prilagojeno tako, da upošteva praktični razvoj postopka soodločanja in je v skladu s prizadevanji Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisija, da postane sprejemanje zakonodaje EU preglednejše, bolj usklajeno, učinkovito in demokratično.
The text of the Declaration has been adapted to take into account the practical evolution of the codecision procedure and is in line with the attempts of Parliament, Council and the Commission to make EU law-making more transparent, coordinated, efficient and democratic.
Ocena besedila
Evaluation of the text
Struktura besedila je bila izboljšana in sedaj nudi koristna dodatna pojasnila, ki temeljijo na temeljnih določbah predhodnega besedila iz leta 1999, ter tako označuje napredek v medinstitucionalnem sodelovanju.
The structure of the text has been improved and it now provides useful additional explanations that build on the basic provisions of its 1999 predecessor, thus marking a step forward in interinstitutional cooperation.
SPLOŠNA NAČELA
SECTION ON GENERAL PRINCIPLES:
Novi oddelek o splošnih načelih opredeljuje namen, cilje in temeljna načela izjave ter nadomešča staro "preambulo", saj novi naslov bolje odraža razširjeno vsebino tega oddelka.
The new section on General Principles specifies the scope, objectives and underlying principles of the Declaration and replaces the old 'preamble', the new title thus better reflecting the expanded content of this section.
Revidirano besedilo izjave iz leta 1999 odraža razvoj medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja s postopkom soodločanja v praksi, kar se kaže v ubeseditvi uvodnega oddelka.
The revised text of the 1999 Declaration reflects the practical evolution of interinstitutional cooperation throughout the codecision procedure, which is reflected in the wording of the introductory section.
Sklicevanje na medinstitucionalni sporazum o boljši pripravi zakonodaje iz leta 2003, ki ga izjava o praktičnih ukrepih za postopek soodločanja dopolnjuje, označuje dodatno izboljšavo starega besedila, saj ponovno potrjuje zavezanost evropskih institucij k spoštovanju načel preglednosti, odgovornosti in učinkovitosti, in k potrebi po poenostavitvi predlogov ob spoštovanju pravnega reda Unije (točka 3).
The reference to the 2003 Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on 'Better Lawmaking', which the Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure complements, marks a further improvement to the old text, as it reconfirms the commitment of the European institutions to the principles of transparency, accountability and efficiency, and the need to focus on simplifying proposals while respecting the legal order of the Union (Point 3).
Pomembno je, da je bil v besedilo izjave vključen pomen uskladitve stališč treh institucij v zgodnji fazi postopka, da se tako poveča učinkovitost postopka odločanja (točka 4).
Significantly, the importance of reconciling the positions of the three institutions at an early stage of the procedure has been added to the text of the Declaration with a view to improving the efficiency of the decision-making process (Point 4).
Točke, ki zadevajo stike med institucijami in usklajevanje urnika dela so bile premaknjene iz oddelka o prvi obravnavi v oddelek o splošnih načelih; tako je upoštevano dejstvo, da jih je treba uporabljati na vseh stopnjah postopka soodločanja (točka 5).
The points regarding interinstitutional contacts and the coordination of working calendars are moved from the section on First Reading to the section on General Principles, thus taking into consideration the fact that they should apply to all stages of the codecision procedure (Point 5).
Določitev okvirnega časovnega razporeda za različne faze postopka, ki jo predlaga nova točka izjave, je v skladu s splošnim ciljem izboljšanja učinkovitosti odločanja, tudi časovne, in je že vsebovana v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o boljši pripravi zakonodaje (točka 6).
The establishment of an indicative timetable for the various stages of the procedure, suggested by a new point of the Declaration, is in line with the overall objective of improving the efficiency and timeliness of decision-making and is already enshrined in the IIA on 'Better Lawmaking' (Point 6).
Revidirano besedilo se izrecno sklicuje na trialoge (tristranska srečanja), da se ponovno potrdi njihova praktična vrednost v postopku iskanja soglasja na začetnih stopnjah postopka soodločanja, in da se spodbudi njihova nadaljnja uporaba.
Trilogues (tripartite meetings) are expressly referred to in the revised text in order to confirm their practical value in the course of finding agreement during the early stages of codecision and to encourage their further use.
Nova izjava določa vodilna načela za organizacijo teh srečanj in predlaga, da se napovedujejo vnaprej (točke 7, 8 in 9).
The new declaration establishes guiding principles for their organisation and suggests their advance announcement (Points 7, 8 and 9).
Nova točka o sodelovanju predstavnikov predsedstva Sveta na sejah parlamentarnih odborov in zahtevah za informacije o stališču Sveta je prvi korak k cilju izboljšanja dialoga med dvema zakonodajnima vejama (točka 10).
A new point on attendance of parliamentary committee meetings by the Council Presidency and requests for information on the Council's position constitutes a first step towards Parliament's objective of improving the dialogue between the two legislative branches (Point 10).
Čeprav ne seže tako daleč, kot je predlagal Parlament, je sprejemljiva kot del splošnega kompromisa, saj pomeni nekatere izboljšave v primerjavi z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom o boljši pripravi zakonodaje.
Although it does not go as far as the original Parliament proposal, it is acceptable as part of a global compromise, as there is some improvement as compared to the IIA on 'Better Lawmaking'.
PRVA OBRAVNAVA:
FIRST READING:
Kar zadeva strukture, je novost revidiranega besedila razdelitev starega oddelka I (PRVA OBRAVNAVA) v dva pododdelka: -"Sporazum na stopnji prve obravnave v Evropskem parlamentu"; -"Sporazum na stopnji skupnega stališča".
Regarding the structure, the innovative element of the revised text is the splitting up of the old section I (FIRST READING) into two sub-sections: - 'Agreement at the stage of first reading in the European Parliament'; - 'Agreement at the stage of Council common position'.
To ustreza dvema možnostma iz člena 251 PES za zgodnji zaključek postopka soodločanja že v prvi obravnavi.
This corresponds to the two possible options in Article 251 TEC for an early conclusion of the codecision procedure at first reading.
Revidirana izjava priznava prakso neformalnih pogajanj med institucijami in končnega oblikovanja sporazumov, doseženih med temi pogajanji, z izmenjavo pisem.
The revised Declaration recognises the practice of informal negotiations between the institutions and the finalisation, through an exchange of letters, of agreements reached during such negotiations.
DRUGA OBRAVNAVA:
SECOND READING:
Za razliko od prejšnjega oddelka (PRVA OBRAVNAVA) ima ta oddelek (DRUGA OBRAVNAVA) le en pododdelek, ki sledi splošnim uvodnim navedbam: "Sporazum na stopnji druge obravnave v Evropskem parlamentu".
Unlike the previous section (FIRST READING), this section (SECOND READING) has only one sub-section after the general introductory remarks: 'Agreement at the stage of second reading in the European Parliament'.
Točka 20 uvaja načelo posvetovanja za določitev datuma za posredovanje skupnih stališč, ki ustreza vsem.
Point 20 introduces the principle of consultation in view of setting a mutually suitable date for the transmission of common positions.
Čeprav je besedilo manj zavezujoče od tistega, kar je načrtoval Parlament, je sprejemljivo kot del splošnega kompromisa.
Although the wording of the text is less binding than that envisaged by Parliament, it was considered acceptable as part of a global compromise.
Tudi v tej obliki nova določba kaže na pripravljenost Sveta, da pri določanju datuma posredovanja skupnih stališč upošteva razpored dela Parlamenta.
Even in its present form, the new provision demonstrates Council's readiness to take account of the parliamentary calendar when determining the date for the transmission of a common position.
Točka 21 v pododdelku "Sporazum na stopnji druge obravnave v Evropskem parlamentu" sedaj odraža že uveljavljeno pomembnejšo vlogo stikov med institucijami in določa osnovni časovni okvir za njihovo nadaljevanje (to je čim prej po posredovanju skupnega stališča Parlamentu), da se pospeši postopek.
Point 21 under the sub-section 'Agreement at the stage of second reading in the European Parliament' now reflects the already established and more central role of interinstitutional contacts and sets out a basic timeframe for their continuation (i.e. as soon as the common position is forwarded to the Parliament) in order to speed up the process.
Kot v prejšnjem oddelku je tudi v pododdelku "Sporazum na stopnji skupnega stališča Sveta" (točka 18), dodana točka, ki formalno priznava najboljšo prakso izmenjave pisem za končno potrditev sporazuma, doseženega med neformalnimi pogajanji (točka 23).
As is the case in the previous section, under the sub-section 'Agreement at the stage of Council common position' (Point 18), a point is introduced to formally recognise the best practice of exchanging letters to finalise agreements reached through informal negotiations (Point 23).
Dve novi točki sta dodani na začetku tega oddelka izjave (SPRAVA).
Two new points are added to the beginning of this section (CONCILIATION) of the Declaration.
V skladu z najboljšo prakso, ki se je sčasoma oblikovala, je predlagan sklic tristranskih srečanj takoj, ko postane jasno, da v drugi obravnavi ne bo dosežen sporazum.
In accordance with the best practices which have evolved over time, it is suggested that trilogue meetings be convened as soon as it becomes clear that no agreement can be reached at second reading.
Takšna srečanja se bodo odvijala ves čas spravnega postopka, da se postavijo temelji za sporazum (točki 24 in 25).
Such meetings will continue to take place throughout the conciliation procedure to prepare the ground for reaching an agreement (Points 24 and 25).
Točki 29 je dodano pojasnilo, ki določa merila za skupno določitev datumov in dnevnih redov sestankov spravnega odbora s strani njegovih sopredsednikov (predsednika Parlamenta in predsednika Sveta).
A clarifying sentence is added to point 29 establishing the criteria for the joint setting of the dates and agendas for the Conciliation Committee meetings by its co-chairs (the President of the Parliament and the President of the Council).
Točka 30 potrjuje prakso, da sopredsednika spravnega odbora obravnavata več nespornih zadev (zadeve A) na dnevnem redu brez razprave, zaradi česa je postopek bolj prilagodljiv.
Point 30 confirms the practice of the co-chairs of the Conciliation Committee of dealing with several non-controversial items (A-items) on the agenda without debate, which makes the process more flexible.
Točka 32 zdaj potrjuje načelo enake uporabe storitev in opreme Parlamenta in Sveta.
Point 32 now endorses the principle of equal sharing of the facilities of the Parliament and the Council.
V okviru točke 33 je bilo stališče Komisije o skupnem stališču Sveta dodano seznamu dokumentov, ki so na voljo odboru.
Under point 33 the Commission's opinion on the Council's common position and Parliament's amendments has been added to the list of documents to be made available to the Committee.
Točka 33 pojasnjuje tudi, da je skupni delovni dokument delegacij Parlamenta in Sveta potreben, da se lažje opredelijo ključna vprašanja in se učinkoviteje obravnavajo.
Point 33 also explains that the joint working document by the Parliament and Council delegations is needed in order to easily identify the key issues and handle them more efficiently.
Rok za predložitev stališča Komisije je podaljšan z dveh tednov na tri tedne po uradnem prejemu izida glasovanja Parlamenta, da se tako določi stvarnejši časovni okvir.
Moreover, the deadline for the submission of the Commission's opinion is extended from two to three weeks after the official receipt of the outcome of Parliament's vote to provide a more feasible timeframe.
Točka 36 potrjuje načelo, da se besedilo dokončno pravno-jezikovno oblikuje pred formalno potrditvijo predlaganega besedila s strani dveh sopredsednikov, vendar omogoča, da se v izjemnih primerih sopredsednikoma spravnega odbora predloži osnutek besedila še pred pravno-jezikovnim oblikovanjem, če je to potrebno, da se spoštujejo roki iz člena 251 PES.
Point 36 confirms the principle that legal-linguistic finalisation should take place prior to the formal approval of proposed texts by the two co-chairs, but it allows for a draft joint text to be submitted to the two co-chairmen of the Conciliation Committee prior to legal-linguistic finalisation in exceptional cases if necessary in order to meet the strict deadlines set in Article 251 TEC.
Točka 37 dodaja novo določbo, da bo delovni dokument, ki je uporabljen med spravnim postopkom, po zaključku postopka dostopen v registru dokumentov vsake institucije.
Point 37 adds the new provision that working documents used during the conciliation procedure will be made available in the Register of each institution involved once the procedure is over.
To prispeva k povečanju preglednosti postopka odločanja.
This contributes to the improved transparency of decision-making.
SPLOŠNE DOLOČBE:
GENERAL PROVISIONS:
Točka 40 tega oddelka (SPLOŠNE DOLOČBE) potrjuje načelo, da službi Parlamenta in Sveta enakopravno sodelujeta pri pravno-jezikovnem oblikovanju.
Point 40 of this section (GENERAL PROVISIONS) confirms the principle that in relation to legal-linguistic finalisation, Parliament's and Council's services cooperate on an equal footing.
Točka 41 izrecno prepoveduje kakršno koli spremembo besedila sporazuma brez soglasja tako predstavnikov Parlamenta kot tudi predstavnikov Sveta na ustrezni ravni.
Point 41 explicitly prohibits any changes to an already agreed text without the agreement of both the Parliament and the Council representatives, at the appropriate level.
Pojasnilo iz točke 42, da je treba končno oblikovanje besedil izpeljati ob upoštevanju različnih postopkov obeh zakonodajnih institucij, je dodatna izboljšava izjave.
A further improvement to the Declaration is the specification provided in point 42 that the finalisation of agreed texts must be carried out with due regard to the different procedures of the two legislating institutions.
Da se prepreči zloraba tega postopka, institucije ne smejo uporabljati rokov, določenih za pravno-jezikovno oblikovanje, za ponovno odprtje razprave o vsebinskih vprašanjih.
In order to prevent any misuse of this procedure, the institutions may not use the time-limits for legal-linguistic finalisation of the document for reopening discussion on substantive issues.
Za večjo doslednost dokumentov točka 43 določa, da se morajo institucije dogovoriti o skupni predstavitvi besedil, točka 44 pa dodaja, da si morajo v čim večji možni meri prizadevati za uporabo medsebojno sprejemljivih standardnih klavzul (zlasti kar zadeva določbe o izvrševanju izvedbenih pooblastil, začetek veljavnosti, prenos in izvrševanje aktov ter kar zadeva spoštovanje pravice Komisije do pobude).
In order to improve the consistency of documents, point 43 stipulates that the institutions are to agree on a common presentation of the texts and point 44 adds that they shall as far as possible attempt to use mutually acceptable standard clauses (in particular as regards provisions concerning the exercise of implementing powers, entry into force, transposition and application of the acts and respect for the Commission's right of initiative).
Institucije soglašajo, da bodo, ko bo to možno, objavile skupna sporočila za javnost in organizirale skupne tiskovne konference za razglasitev uspešnega zaključka opravljenega dela (točka 45), da se spodbuja preglednost in izogne neuravnoteženim enostranskim izjavam.
With a view to promoting transparency and avoiding unbalanced unilateral statements, the institutions agree to organise, as far as possible, joint press releases and press conferences to announce the successful outcomes of their work (Point 45).
V zvezi s tem točka 47 sedaj predvideva podpis pomembnih besedil, o katerih je bil dosežen dogovor, na mesečni skupni slovesnosti v prisotnosti sredstev javnega obveščanja.
Also in this connection, point 47 now provides for the signing of important agreed texts at a joint ceremony on a monthly basis in the presence of the media.
Predsednika institucij prejmeta besedilo za podpis v svojem jeziku.
Furthermore, the Presidents of the two institutions shall receive the texts for signature in their own languages.
Točka 48 je bila revidirana, da je bolj jasno, kdaj je pričakovana objava zakonodajnih besedil v uradnem listu, o katerih je bilo doseženo soglasje, , in določa, da je običajni časovni okvir dva meseca po sprejetju zakonodajnega besedila s strani Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Point 48 has been revised to give more clarity as to when the agreed legislative texts are expected to be published in the Official Journal and stipulates that the normal timeframe is two months after the adoption of the legislative act by the European Parliament and the Council.
Točka 49 pojasnjuje postopek obravnavanja tipkarskih ali očitnih napak v besedilih pred in po sprejetju besedila.
Point 49 clarifies the procedure of handling identified clerical or obvious errors in the texts both before and after adoption of a text.
V splošnem revidirana izjava, ki je bila predložena Parlamentu v odobritev, izboljšuje tako strukturo kot tudi vsebino izjave iz leta 1999 tako, da dodaja številne pomembne določbe, ki ta dokument usklajujejo z obstoječo najboljšo prakso; cilj izjave je okrepiti sodelovanje med tremi institucijami, da se tako poveča učinkovitost in kakovost zakonodaje EU.
All in all, the revised Declaration submitted to Parliament for approval improves both the structure and the contents of the 1999 version by adding a number of important provisions, which adapt the document to the existing best practices and which aim to strengthen the cooperation between the three institutions with a view to improving the efficiency and the quality of EU legislation.
PRILOGA: SKUPNA IZJAVA O PRAKTIČNIH UKREPIH ZA POSTOPEK SOODLOČANJA (ČLEN 251 POGODBE O ES)
ANNEX: JOINT DECLARATION ON PRACTICAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CODECISION PROCEDURE (ARTICLE 251 OF THE EC TREATY)
SKUPNA IZJAVA O PRAKTIČNIH UKREPIH ZA POSTOPEK SOODLOČANJA (ČLEN 251 POGODBE O ES)
JOINT DECLARATION ON PRACTICAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CODECISION PROCEDURE (ARTICLE 251 OF THE EC TREATY)
Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija, v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj imenovani "institucije", ugotavljajo, da se je sedanja praksa, ki vključuje pogovore med predsedstvom Sveta, Komisijo ter predsedujočimi ustreznim odborom in/ali poročevalci Evropskega parlamenta in med sopredsedujočimi spravnemu odboru, izkazala za koristno.
The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, hereinafter referred to collectively as 'the institutions', note that current practice involving talks between the Council Presidency, the Commission and the chairs of the relevant committees and/or rapporteurs of the European Parliament and between the co-chairs of the Conciliation Committee has proved its worth.