natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Besedilo je nejasno; vprašanje mora biti zato urejeno z uredbo in ne s konvencijo.
The wording is imprecise; this question should be determined by the regulation, not by the Convention.
Predlog spremembe št. 16 v zvezi s členom 1(3)(a) (novo) sproža to vprašanje prepoznavanja nadzora, kar omogoča odpravo te določbe.
As Amendment 18 to Article 1(3)a) (new) raises the question of recognition in the field of control, Article 4(6) can be deleted.
Člen 4, odstavek 6 a (novo)
Article 4, paragraph 6 a (new)
Predlog odbora v nobenem trenutku ne predvideva postopkov registriranja ESOS, postopkov nadzora procesa registriranja – usklajenost ESOS z uredbo in z nacionalno zakonodajo zadevne države članice.
The Commission proposal makes no provision for EGTC registration procedures or for procedures whereby the EGTC's registration process and compliance with the Regulation and with the national law of the designated Member State may be checked.
Ta določba je nujna, ker ta predlog spremembe 31 predlaga predložitev procesa registriranja ESOS veljavnim pravilom za registriranje združenj in označitev kraja registracije ter veljavne zakonodaje v skladu z odločitvijo članov ESOS o izbiri nacionalne zakonodaje države članice, ki velja za ESOS.
This is a necessary provision, which is why Amendment 31 proposes that the EGTC registration procedure be subject to the rules and regulations that apply to the registration of associations, and that the place of registration and the applicable law be determined in accordance with the decision reached by the EGTC members as to the choice of Member State whose national law shall apply to the EGTC.
Pogoji, pod katerimi se izvajajo koncesije ali delegacije javnih služb, dodeljene ESČS -u v okviru čezmejnega sodelovanja, so določeni v konvenciji na osnovi veljavnih javnih zakonodaj.
The conditions for granting concessions or public service delegations to the EGCC within the cross-border co-operation are to be defined in the convention, on the basis of the applicable national law.
Pogoji koncesije ali delegacije javnih služb v ESOS -u v okviru ozemeljskega sodelovanja, so določeni v konvenciji na osnovi veljavnih javnih zakonodaj.
The conditions for granting concessions or public service delegations to the EGTC within the territorial co-operation are to be defined in the convention, on the basis of the applicable national law.
Člen 4, odstavek 8
Article 4, paragraph 8
Konvencijo se predloži vsem članom in državam članicam.
The convention is notified to all its members and to the Member States.
Konvencijo se predloži državam članicam, vključenim v ESOS, Komisiji in Odboru regij.
The convention is notified to the Member States involved in the EGTC, to the Commission and to the Committee of the Regions .
Komisija vpiše konvencijo v javni register vseh konvencij o Evropskih skupinah za ozemeljsko sodelovanje.
The Commission shall enter the convention in a public register of all conventions on EGTCs .
Ni nujno predstaviti konvencijo svojim članom, vendar pa je treba natančno navesti, za katere države članice od tistih iz konvencije gre.
It is not necessary to present the convention to the EGTC members, but we do need to clarify which Member States need to be notified - i.e. those who are affected by the convention.
Prav tako je utemeljeno ponuditi na voljo bazo podatkov o vseh ESOS-ih, ki se lahko vzpostavijo na ozemlju Unije, in dodeliti izvajanje te naloge Odboru regij.
It would also be appropriate to place at its disposal a database covering all the EGTCs set up on Union territory, and to entrust this task to the Committee of the Regions.
Člen 5, odstavek 2, točke (a) do (e)
Article 5, paragraph 2, points a) to e)
Statuti vsebujejo določbe:
The statutes contain the following provisions:
c) poimenovanje in kraj sedeža;
c) its name and the address of its seat;
S statuti se lahko predpišejo tudi dodatni organi;
The statutes may provide for supplementary organs ;
Vsaka pravna oseba ustanovi lastne organe v skladu z zakonodajo, ki ureja načela njenega delovanja.
Every entity having legal personality can establish its own organs in accordance with the law governing the way in which it operates.
Zato je pametno, da prepusti preudarnosti članov ESOS-a izbiro organizacijskega sistema, ob upoštevanju, da pazi na to, da ima vsak ESOS na voljo skupščino, sestavljeno iz vseh članov ESOS-a, in odbor – torej izvršni organ, sestavljen iz ene ali več oseb.
It would seem advisable, therefore, to leave the choice of organisational system up to the EGTC members, subject to the proviso that every EGTC should have an assembly representing all its members and an executive committee, i.e an executive body composed of one or more persons.
Prav tako je treba povišati pristojnosti članov ESOS-a, da določijo določila v zvezi z zastopanjem ESOS-a, torej kdo bi lahko zastopal skupino in na katerem področju, za sklenitev sporazumov mora biti zastopanje ESOS-a sestavljeno iz ene ali več oseb itd.
It should also be up to EGTC members to specify the arrangements for EGTC representation, i.e who can represent the grouping in what field, whether it should be represented by one or more persons when concluding agreements, etc.
Člen 5, odstavek 2,točka (i a)(novo)
Article 5, paragraph 2, point i a) (new)
(ia) načini prenehanja njegovega delovanja.
ia) the modalities for its dissolution.
Za zagotavljanje demokratičnega in preglednega upravljanja mora vsak ESOS imeti skupščino, ki jo sestavljajo predstavniki vseh članov, izvršni odbor in/ali direktor, ki ji odgovarjajo.
In order to guarantee its democratic and transparent management every EGTC should have an assembly made up of representatives of all its members and an executive committee and/or director, who are answerable to the assembly.
Statut mora prav tako vsebovati določbe v zvezi s prenehanjem delovanja ESOS.
The statute should also contain provisions regarding the dissolution of the EGTC.
Predlog spremembe 36 poročevalca, ki črta člen 6, dopolnjuje ta predlog spremembe.
Amendment 36 of the rapporteur, which deletes Article 6, is complementary to this amendment.
Od sprejetja statutov ima ESČS pristojnost delovanja v skladu s členom 3(2).
Upon adoption of the statutes, the EGCC has the capacity to act, in accordance with article 3, paragraph 2.
Predlog spremembe 31, ki uvaja novo določbo v člen4(6 a) (novo), predlaga uvedbo postopkov registriranja ESOS-a na podlagi veljavne zakonodaje za registracijo združenj.
Amendment 31, which inserts a new provision, Article 6a, proposes the introduction of EGTC registration procedures based on the law applicable to the registration of associations.
Zato je treba potrditi dejstvo, da je ESOS pridobil status pravne osebe in sposobnost delovanja v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo za registracijo združenj.
Consequently, it is appropriate to confirm the fact that the EGTC acquires legal personality and the capacity to act pursuant to the law applicable to the registration of associations.
Torej je treba določbo iz člena 5(4), ki je nejasna, odstraniti.
Consequently, the text of Article 5(4), which is insufficiently precise, should be withdrawn.
ESČS predstavlja direktor, ki deluje v imenu in v dobro ESČS -a.
The EGCC is represented by a director, who acts on its behalf.
ESČS ima lahko skupščino, ki jo sestavljajo predstavniki članov.
The EGCC can equip itself with an assembly, which is made up by representatives of its members.
Predlog spremembe 34 predlaga novo besedilo člena 5(2 d) in člena 5 (2 d bis) – članom ESOS-a prepušča izbiro organizacijskega sistema ESOS-a, kjer velja, da ima vsak ESOSna voljo skupščino in odbor, in natančno določa, da morajo biti načela zastopanja ESOS-a določena.
Amendment 34 proposes to reword Article 5(2)(d) and insert a new Article 5(2)(da), leaving the choice of organisational system for the EGTC up to its members, provided that each EGTC has an assembly and an executive committee, and specifying that rules concerning the representation of the EGTC must be laid down.
Zato se mora določilo člena 6(1), ki je v nasprotju s predlogom spremembe 34 in nepravično omejuje pristojnosti članov ESOS-a, odstraniti.
Consequently, the provisions of Article 6(1), which are inconsistent with Amendment 34 and place unjustifiable limits on the competencies of EGTC members, should be withdrawn.
Konvencija, s katero je ESČS ustanovljen in s katero lahko slednji deluje v skladu s členom 5(4), mora biti objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The EGCC is published in the Official Journal of the European Union, once it has the capacity to act, in accordance with article 5, paragraph 4.
Od tega trenutka je pravna sposobnost ESČS -a priznana v vsaki državi članici.
As of this instant, the legal capacity of the EGCC is recognised in each Member State.
Potem ko je ESOS pridobil status pravne osebe v skladu z zakonodajo države članice, ki jo določijo člani, se statut, s katerim je ESOS ustanovljen, objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije .
After the EGTC has acquired legal personality in accordance with the law of the Member State designated by its members, the statutes establishing the EGTC shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta objava vsebuje poimenovanje ESČS -a, njegov namen, seznam njegovih članov in naslov njegovega sedeža.
This publication includes the name of the EGCC , its objective, the list of its members and the address of its seat.
Ta objava vsebuje poimenovanje ESOS-a, njegov namen, seznam njegovih članov in naslov njegovega sedeža.
This publication includes the name of the EGTC , its objective, the list of its members and the address of its seat.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi evropske skupine za čezmejno sodelovanje (GECT)
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a European grouping of cross-border cooperation (EGCC)
člena 251(2) in 159(3) ES
Articles 251(2) and 159(3) TEC
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o patentabilnosti računalniško izvedenih izumov
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o patentabilnosti računalniško izvedenih izumov
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (11979/1/2004 – C6‑0058/2005 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (11979/1/2004 – C6‑0058/2005 ),
UL C 77, 26.3.2004, str.
OJ C 77, 26.3.2004, p.
87. o predlogu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2002)0092 )
87. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2002)0092 )
UL C 151, 25.6.2002, str.
OJ C 151, 25.6.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 62 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za pravne zadeve za drugo obravnavo ( A6‑0207/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0207/2005 ),
(5a) Pravila Konvencije o podelitvi evropskih patentov, podpisane v Münchnu dne 5. oktobra 1973, in zlasti njen člen 52 o mejah patentabilnosti, je treba potrditi in pojasniti.
(5a) The rules of the Convention on the Grant of European Patents signed in Munich on 5 October 1973, and in particular Article 52 thereof concerning the limits to patentability, should be confirmed and clarified.
(8a) Države članice morajo spoštovati določbe te direktive, ko delujejo v okviru Evropske patentne konvencije.
(8a) Member States should respect the provisions of this Directive when acting within the framework of the European Patent Convention.
Ta predlog spremembe priznava, da so države članice tudi pogodbenice Evropske patentne konvencije in da imajo države članice nekaj vpliva na delovanje Evropskega patentnega urada, zlasti v zvezi z zagotavljanjem, da Evropski patentni urad ravna v skladu s to direktivo.
This amendment recognises that the Member States are also Contracting States of the European Patent Convention and that Member States have some influence on the practice of the European Patent Office, specifically with respect to ensuring that the European Patent Office complies with this directive.
(8b) Evropska patentna konvencija zagotavlja, da upravni svet Evropske patentne organizacije nadzoruje Evropski patentni urad in da predsednik Evropskega patentnega urada za njegove dejavnosti odgovarja upravnemu svetu.
(8b) The European Patent Convention provides that the European Patent Office is supervised by the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation, and that the President of the European Patent Office is answerable for its activities to the Administrative Council.
Upravni svet sestavljajo predstavniki pogodbenic Evropske patentne konvencije, katerega jasno večino oblikujejo države članice.
The Administrative Council is composed of representatives of the Contracting States of the European Patent Convention, a clear majority of which is formed by Member States of the European Union.
Ti predstavniki morajo sprejemati takšne ukrepe, kot so v okviru njihovih pooblastil, za zagotovitev, da Evropski patentni urad ravna v skladu s to direktivo.
These representatives should take such measures as are within their authority to ensure compliance by the European Patent Office with this Directive.
Ta predlog spremembe priznava, da so države članice tudi pogodbenice Evropske patentne konvencije in da imajo države članice nekaj vpliva na delovanje Evropskega patentnega urada, zlasti v zvezi z ohranjanjem visokih standardov preverjanja patentnih vlog zlasti v povezavi z inovativno ravnjo in „tehničnim prispevkom“, kot je opredeljeno v tej direktivi.
This amendment recognises that the Member States are also Contracting States of the European Patent Convention and that Member States have some influence on the practice of the European Patent Office, specifically with respect to maintaining high standards of examining patent applications in particular with respect to inventive step and “technical contribution’ as defined in this directive.
Razen tega ta predlog spremembe zahteva, da države članice (v Svetu) vsako leto Evropskemu parlamentu poročajo o tem, kako so v zvezi s tem dejansko vplivale na EPU, in o napredku, doseženem na poti do cilja zmanjšanja števila podeljenih nevrednih patentov.
Furthermore, this amendment requires Member States (in Council) to report to the European Parliament each year on what they have actually done to influence the EPO in this regard and on the progress that has been made towards the goal of minimising the grant of undeserving patents.
Uvodna izjava 10 a (novo)
Article 10 a (new)
(10a) Za tehnični prispevek šteje, če tehnična dognanja prispevajo k rešitvi tehničnega problema.
(10a) A technical contribution is present if technical considerations contribute to the solution of a technical problem.
Za tehnični prispevek ne šteje, če je zadeva, na katero se sklicuje patent, sestavljena le iz odkritij, znanstvenih teorij, matematičnih metod, estetskih stvaritev, načrtov, pravil in metod za umske dejavnosti, igranje iger ali poslovanje, računalniških programov ali predstavitev informacij, ne da bi bila omejena na novo, neočitno in tehnično zadevo, ki se jo lahko naredi ali uporabi v kakršni koli industriji.
A technic al contribution is not present if the subject-matter claimed in the patent solely consists of discoveries, scientific theories, mathematical methods, aesthetic creations, schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, programs for computers, or presentations of information, without being limited to new, non-obvious and technical subject matter that can be made or used in any kind of industry.
Pojasnitev pojma „tehnični prispevek“.
Clarification of ‘technical contribution’.
Medtem ko je pozitivna opredelitev tehničnega prispevka precej težka in nujno odprta za razlago, je vseeno pomembno, da se pojasni, katere razlage tega izraza niso predvidene v okviru te direktive.
Whereas the positive definition of technical contribution is rather difficult and is necessarily open to interpretation, it is nevertheless important to make clear which interpretations of this term as not envisaged in the framework of this Directive.
(11) Da izum velja za patentabilnega, mora biti tehničen, torej spadati na področje tehnologije.
(11) In order for any invention to be considered as patentable it should have a technical character, and thus belong to a field of technology.
Prav tako mora biti primeren za industrijsko uporabo, nov in vsebovati inventivno raven.
It must also be capable of industrial application, be new, and involve an inventive step.
Ta predlog spremembe opominja na pogoje patentabilnosti.
This amendment is a reminder of the conditions of patentability.
(12) V splošnem morajo izumi, da zadostijo merilu inventivne ravni, dati tehnični prispevek stanju tehnike.
(12) It is a condition for inventions in general that, in order to involve an inventive step, they should make a technical contribution to the state of the art.
(12) V splošnem morajo izumi, da zadostijo merilu inventivne ravni, dati nov tehnični prispevek stanju tehnike.
(12) It is a condition for inventions in general that, in order to involve an inventive step, they should make a new technical contribution to the state of the art.
(14a) Obdelava podatkov v smislu te direktive ne zajema prepoznavanja fizičnih učinkov in njihove pretvorbe v podatke.
(14a) Data processing within the meaning of this Directive does not cover the identification of physical effects and their conversion into data.
Metoda obdelave podatkov ne zajema vmesnikov, omenjenih v uvodni izjavi, ki spadajo na področje tehnologije.
The method of data processing does not cover the interfaces referred to in the Recital which belong to a field of technology.
(15) Če se prispevek stanju tehnike nanaša samo na nepatentabilno zadevo, ne moremo govoriti o patentabilnem izumu ne glede na to, kako je predmet predstavljen v prijavi.
(15) If the contribution to the state of the art relates solely to unpatentable matter, there can be no patentable invention irrespective of how the matter is presented in the claims.
Na primer, zahteve o tehničnem prispevku ni mogoče obiti preprosto z navedbo tehničnih sredstev v patentni prijavi.
For example, the requirement for technical contribution cannot be circumvented merely by specifying technical means in the patent claims .
(15) Če se prispevek stanju umetnosti nanaša samo na nepatentabilno zadevo, ne moremo govoriti o patentabilnem izumu ne glede na to, kako je predmet predstavljen v prijavi.
(15) If the contribution to the state of the art relates solely to unpatentable matter, there can be no patentable invention irrespective of how the matter is presented in the claims.
Na primer, zahteve o tehničnem prispevku ni mogoče obiti zgolj z navedbo tehničnih sredstev v patentni prijavi .
For example, the requirement for technical contribution cannot be circumvented merely by specifying technical means in the patent claim .
Prispevka k stanju tehnike nepatentabilne zadeve ni, ker ni tehničen.
(First part of amendment does not affect English version.)
Nasprotno lahko govorimo o stanju umetnosti za netehnična področja.
A contribution to the state of the art must by definition be technical in nature.
(17a) Države članice zagotovijo, da opis prikazuje izum, kot je prijavljen, tako da je tehnični problem in njegove rešitve ter tudi inventivno raven mogoče razumeti.
(17a) Member States shall ensure that the description discloses the invention as claimed in such terms that the technical problem and its solution as well as the inventive step can be understood.
Ta predlog spremembe nadalje pojasnjuje, kaj mora biti predloženo v patentni prijavi.
This amendment further clarifies what has to be disclosed in a patent application.
Še zlasti mora patentna prijava razložiti tehnični problem, ki ga izum poskuša rešiti, in njegovo rešitev tako, da jo je mogoče razumeti.
In particular, the patent application has to explain the technical problem that the invention is seeking to overcome, and its solution, in a way that can be understood.
(20) Konkurenčni položaj industrije Skupnosti v odnosu z njenimi glavnimi trgovinskimi partnerji se bo izboljšal, če bodo sedanje razlike v pravnem varstvu računalniško izvedenih izumov odpravljene in bo pravna ureditev pregledna.
(20) The competitive position of Community industry in relation to its major trading partners will be improved if the current differences in the legal protection of computer-implemented inventions are eliminated and the legal situation is transparent.
Glede na trenutno težnjo tradicionalne predelovalne industrije, da svojo dejavnost preusmerja na cenovno ugodne trge izven Skupnosti, je pomen varstva intelektualne lastnine in posebej patentnega varstva očiten.
With the present trend for traditional manufacturing industry to shift their operations to low-cost economies outside the Community, the importance of intellectual property protection and in particular patent protection is self-evident.
(20a) Mala in srednje velika podjetja so bistvena za gospodarski uspeh in globalno konkurenčnost Evropske unije in njenih držav članic.
(20a) Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are essential to the economic success and global competitiveness of the European Union and its Member States.
Pravice intelektualne lastnine koristijo malim in srednje velikim podjetjem prav tako kot večjim subjektom.
Intellectual property rights benefit small and medium-sized enterprises just as they do larger entities.
Za zagotovitev, da ta direktiva podpira interese MSP, je treba oblikovati Odbor za tehnološke novosti v sektorju malih in srednje velikih podjetij.
To ensure that this Directive advances the interests of SMEs, a Committee on Technological Innovation in the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Sector should be formed.
Ta odbor se mora osredotočati na vprašanja v zvezi s patenti, ki so pomembna za takšna podjetja, in o teh vprašanjih obvestiti Komisijo, če je potrebno.
This Committee should focus on patent-related issues relevant to such enterprises and should bring these issues to the attention of the Commission as necessary.
Ta predlog spremembe je povezan s členom 10 (spremljanje), ki ga je na prvi obravnavi sprejel Evropski parlament.
This amendment relates to Article 10 (Monitoring) adopted by the European Parliament during First Reading.
MSP zdaj dejavno sodelujejo v evropskem patentnem sistemu CII.
Currently, SMEs participate actively in Europe’s CII patents system.
MSP res predstavljajo večino vlagateljev patentov CII.
Indeed, SMEs represent the majority of applicants for CII patents.
Za zagotovitev stalnega in dejavnega sodelovanja MSP – in za zagotovitev priložnosti za povečanje njihovega sodelovanja – ta predlog spremembe predlaga ustanovitev odbora, osredotočenega na zadeve v zvezi z MSP, s pooblastilom priporočanja potrebnih reform.
To ensure ongoing and active participation by SMEs—and to provide opportunities to enhance their involvement—this amendment proposes the creation of a committee focused on SME-related issues, with a mandate to recommend necessary reforms.
(21) Ta direktiva ne posega v uporabo členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe , še posebej, kjer prevladujoči dobavitelj zavrača uporabo patentirane tehnike, ki je potrebna izključno za zagotovitev konverzije konvencij dveh različnih računalniških sistemov ali omrežij ter za prenos in izmenjavo podatkov med njima .
(21) This Directive should be without prejudice to the application of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty , in particular where a dominant supplier refuses to allow the use of patented technique which is needed for the sole purpose of ensuring conversion of the conventions used in two different computers systems or networks so as to allow communication and exchange of data content between them .
(21) Ta direktiva ne posega v uporabo pravil konkurence, še zlasti členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe.
(21) This Directive should be without prejudice to the application of the competition rules, in particular Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty.