natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar bi vpliv takšnega zvišanja najnižjih stopenj bil najmanjši, ker bi se razhajanja med državami članicami nato povečala.
However, the impact of such an increase in minimum rates would be minimal as significant disparities would continue to exist between Member States.
Druga izražena utemeljitev je boj proti izkrivljanju konkurence, ki je neposredno povezan z različnimi stopnjami med sosednjimi državami članicami.
Another argument used is the need to combat distortions of competition linked directly to rate disparities between neighbouring Member States.
Učinek povišanja najnižjih stopenj ne bi ničesar spremenil.
The impact of an increase in minimum rates would make no difference.
Na primer, raven čezmejne trgovine med Združenim kraljestvom in Francijo ter med Finsko in Estonijo ne bi bila prizadeta zaradi zvišanja najnižjih stopenj, ker to ne zadeva teh držav.
For instance, cross-border trade between the United Kingdom and France or between Finland and Estonia will not be affected by an increase in minimum rates as these countries are not concerned.
Tako trošarina za liter piva s 5% vol. znaša 0,09 EUR v Češki republiki in na Malti ter 1,43 EUR na Finskem.
For instance, excise duty on a litre of beer at 5% abv is €0.09 in the Czech Republic and Malta and €1.43 in Finland.
Za 70 cl mirnega vina z največ 15 % vol. je treba plačati 0,02 EUR v Franciji in 1,91 EUR na Irskem.
The rate for 70cl of still wine at 15% abv is € 0.02 in France and € 1.91 in Ireland.
Trošarina za 70 cl penečega vina z največ 15 % vol. znaša 0,06 EUR v Franciji in 3,82 EUR na Irskem.
Excise duty on 70cl of sparkling wine at 15% max. abv is € 0.06 in France and €3.82 in Ireland.
Za 70 cl vmesnega izdelka z največ 22 % vol. je treba plačati 0,31 EUR v Grčiji in 4,94 EUR na Finskem.
The rate for 70cl of an intermediate product at 22% max. abv is €0.31 in Greece and €4.94 in Finland.
Za 70 cl. žganih pijač z alkoholno stopnjo 40 % Ciper uporablja stopnjo 1,68 EUR in Švedska 15,41 EUR.
Finally, the rate for 70cl of spirits at 40% abv is € 1.68 in Cyprus and €15.41 in Sweden.
Če bi države članice, ki še danes uporabljajo najnižje stopnje, določene leta 1992, želele zvišati slednje, da bi preprečile zmanjšanje realne vrednosti teh stopenj ali povečale svoje davčne prihodke, bi to lahko storile in to še vedno lahko storijo.
If those Member States which still apply the minimum rates set in 1992 had wished to increase them, either to avoid reducing the real value of these rates or to increase their tax revenues, they could have done so and are still free to do so.
Če se to ni zgodilo v nekaterih državah članicah, je treba sklepati, da imajo zadevne države članice, od katerih tri stare in šest novih, tehtne razloge, da tako ravnajo, ki jih je treba spoštovati.
If this was not the case for some Member States, we can conclude that these Member States, including three old and six new Member States, had valid reasons, which should be respected.
Države članice, ki so določile zadevne trošarinske stopnje na izrazito višji ravni od najnižjih stopenj in ki se pritožujejo zaradi povečane čezmejne trgovine, bi morale vedeti, da je povečanje čezmejne trgovine zaradi prostega pretoka blaga eden od ciljev enotnega trga.
Member States which have set the excise duty rates in question at levels far higher than the minimum rates and which complain of growing cross-border trade should be aware that the increase in cross-border trade through the free movement of goods is one of the objectives of the single market.
Davčna konkurenca je popolnoma zakonita na enotnemu trgu.
Tax competition is perfectly legitimate in the single market.
Ne smemo sklepati o izkrivljanju konkurence kot posledici različnih stopenj, saj države članice lahko svobodno določajo raven teh stopenj.
There is no reason to consider that there is a distortion of competition as a result of different rates in so far as Member States are free to set such rates as they wish.
Minimalne stopnje, določene leta 1992, ki jih uporablja manjšina sedanjih držav članic, niso preprečile drugim državam članicam, da ne bi s stalnimi zviševanji svojih stopenj povečale razlike med stopnjami, ki jih sedaj uporablja 27 držav članic.
The minimum rates set in 1992 and applied by a minority of the current Member States have not prevented the other Member States from widening the gap between rates currently applied by the 27 Member States by repeatedly increasing their rates.
Za določitev najnižjih stopenj torej ni razloga.
Setting minimum rates is therefore no longer justified.
Treba je razveljaviti veljavno zakonodajo Skupnosti.
Community legislation on the matter should be abolished.
V tem smislu je treba poudariti, da prihodki iz trošarin in davka na potrošnjo predstavljajo povprečno 2,7 % BND v EU 25 držav članic.
In this connection, it should be noted that income from excise duties and consumption taxes accounts for an average of 2.7% of GDP in the 25-member EU.
Trošarine za naftne derivate in tobak ter v nekaterih državah članicah trošarine za energijo predstavljajo največji odstotek tega deleža.
Excise duties on oil products and tobacco and, in some Member States, energy account for the bulk of this figure.
V državah članicah, ki uporabljajo trošarinske stopnje za alkoholne pijače na približni ravni najnižjih stopenj, nastali davčni prihodek tvori izredno majhen odstotek tega deleža.
In Member States which apply excise rates on alcoholic beverages around the minimum rates, the tax revenues generated account for a tiny proportion of this figure.
V primeru Nemčije so davčni prihodki iz trošarin za pivo leta 2002 znašali 808,89 milijona EUR, iz trošarin za cigarete 13.346,42 milijona EUR, to je več kot 13 milijard EUR.
In the case of Germany, revenue from excise duty on beer in 2002 was €808.99 million and the tax revenue from excise duty on cigarettes was €13 346.2 million.
Davčni prihodki iz trošarin za neosvinčeno gorivo so znašali 22,7 milijarde EUR.
The tax revenue generated by excise duty on unleaded petrol was €22.7 million.
Trošarine za alkoholne izdelke torej prinašajo sorazmerno malo v davčno blagajno, če jih primerjamo z davčnimi prihodki iz trošarin za tobak in naftne derivate.
Thus, excise duty on alcohol products accounts for fairly limited tax revenues compared with those generated by tax duty on tobacco and oil products.
Če se upoštevajo stroški birokracije in uprave, povezani s pobiranjem trošarin, prihodki iz trošarin za alkohol komaj omogočajo v večini primerov pokritje stroškov; neto prihodek je minimalen, celo ničen v državah članicah, ki uporabljajo najnižje stopnje.
Lastly, when one considers the bureaucratic and administrative costs related to the collection of excise duty, the revenues generated by excise duty on alcohol barely cover these costs in most cases and the net income is minimal if not inexistent in Member States which apply minimum rates.
Zakaj bi jim naložili najnižje stopnje, če lahko določajo višje stopnje glede na svoje proračunske potrebe?
Why impose minimum rates on them when they are free to set higher rates according to their budgetary needs?
Določitev najnižjih stopenj v 15 letih ni imela nobenega vpliva na približevanje trošarinskih stopenj za alkohol in alkoholne pijače ter v ničemer ne prispeva k odpravi izkrivljanja konkurence.
The existence of minimum rates has in 15 years had no effect on the approximation of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages and is not helping to solve the alleged distortions of competition.
Povečanje čezmejne trgovine ni privedlo do najnižjih, ampak do prekomernih stopenj v nordijskih državah članicah.
The increase in cross-border trade is not the result of the minimum rates but of the excessive rates applied by northern Member States.
Komisija poudarja, da bo njen predlog za zvišanje najnižjih trošarinskih stopenj za alkoholne pijače imel najmanjši vpliv na končne cene.
The Commission stresses the minimal impact of its proposal to increase minimum rates of excise duty on alcoholic beverages on final prices.
Pozablja, da bo vsako zvišanje najnižjih stopenj imelo posledice za končne cene zaradi množilnega učinka (DDV in profitne marže) in bi torej imelo inflacijski učinek, zlasti v novih državah članicah, ki temu upravičeno nasprotujejo.
It overlooks the fact that any increase in the minimum rates will have an impact on final prices through its multiplier effects (VAT and profit margins) and would therefore have an inflationary impact, especially in the new Member States, which are justifiably opposed to the idea.
Niti potrošniki niti proizvajalci ne bodo imeli koristi od tega ukrepa.
Neither consumers nor producers will draw any benefit from this measure.
Glede na obstoječe razmere ni več razloga za obstoj najnižjih trošarinskih stopenj za alkohol in alkoholne pijače.
As things stand, the minimum rates of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages have lost their raison d'être .
Lahko bi se odpravile, vendar to državam članicam ne bo preprečilo, da bi ne ohranile sedanjih stopenj ali jih celo zvišale na lastno odgovornost.
They can therefore be abolished, and this will not prevent Member States from maintaining the current rates or even increasing them under their own responsibility.
Približevanje trošarinskih stopenj za alkohol in alkoholne pijače
Approximation of the rates of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages
Odbori, ki niso podali mnenja
Not delivering opinion(s)
o globalni Evropi – zunanji vidiki konkurenčnosti
on Global Europe - external aspects of competitiveness
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 28. septembra 2006 o gospodarskih in trgovinskih odnosih Evropske unije z Indijo
– having regard to its resolution of 28 September 2006 on the EU’s economic and trade relations with India
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0388 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0388 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2006 o letnem poročilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu o protidampinških, protisubvencijskih in zaščitnih ukrepih tretjih držav proti Skupnosti (2004)
– having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2006 on the annual report from the Commission to the European Parliament on third country anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard action against the Community (2004)
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0450 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0450 . ,
UL C 293E, 2.12.2006, str.
OJ C 293E, 2.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. oktobra 2006 o gospodarskih in trgovinskih odnosih med EU in Mercosurjem z namenom sklenitve medregionalnega pridružitvenega sporazuma
– having regard to its resolution of 12 October 2006 on economic and trade relations between the EU and Mercosur with a view to the conclusion of an Interregional Association Agreement
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0419 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0419 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. junija 2006 o čezatlantskih gospodarskih odnosih EU‑ZDA
– having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on EU-US transatlantic economic relations
UL C 233E, 28.9.2006, str.
OJ C 233E, 28.9.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z 6. septembra 2005 o tekstilu in oblačilih po letu 2005
– having regard to its resolution of 6 September 2005 on textiles and clothing after 2005
UL C 193E, 17.8.2006, str.
OJ C 193E, 17.8.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta osebja Komisije k sporočilu Komisije z naslovom Gospodarske reforme in konkurenčnost: ključna sporočila Evropskega poročila o konkurenčnosti za leto 2006 (SEC(2006) 1467),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document accompanying the Communication from the Commission entitled ‘Economic reforms and competitiveness: key messages from the European Competitiveness Report 2006’ ( SEC(2006)1467 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 23. in 24. marca 2006
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Brussels European Council, held on 23 and 24 March 2006
Dokument Sveta 7775/1/06. ,
Council Document 7775/1/06. ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. marca 2006 o prispevku k spomladanskemu zasedanju Evropskega sveta 2006 v zvezi z lizbonsko strategijo
– having regard to its resolution of 15 March 2006 on the input to the Spring 2006 European Council in relation to the Lisbon Strategy
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom EU‑Kitajska: Tesnejši partnerici, naraščajoče odgovornosti ter spremnega delovnega dokumenta z naslovom Tesnejše partnerstvo, več odgovornosti: dokument o trgovinski in naložbeni politiki EU–Kitajska: konkurenca in partnerstvo ( KOM(2006)0631 in 0632),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled ‘EU − China: Closer Partners, growing responsibilities’ and the accompanying working document entitled ‘Closer Partners, Growing Responsibilities: A policy paper on EU-China trade and investment: Competition and Partnership’ ( COM(2006)0631 and 0632),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0149/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0149/2007 ),
A. ker lahko trgovinska politika odločilno prispeva k spodbujanju rasti in ustvarjanju delovnih mest v skladu s cilji prenovljene lizbonske agende,
A. whereas trade policy can contribute decisively to the stimulation of growth and the creation of jobs in line with the objectives of the renewed Lisbon agenda,
B. ker mora EU sprejeti ustrezno strategijo, da se bo spoprijela z izzivi globalizacije ter se soočila z vse večjo konkurenco velikih rastočih gospodarstev ter hkrati ohranila evropski model ekonomske, regionalne in socialne kohezije,
B. whereas an appropriate strategy must be adopted by the EU in order to meet the challenges of globalisation and to confront increased competition from major emerging economies, while preserving the European model of economic, regional and social cohesion,
C. ker je za uspeh te pobude nujna skladnost med notranjimi in zunanjimi vidiki prenovljene lizbonske agende,
C. whereas consistency between the internal and external aspects of the renewed Lisbon agenda is indispensable to the success of that initiative,
D. ker notranje strukturne reforme pomembno vplivajo na izboljšanje notranje in zunanje konkurenčnosti podjetij iz EU,
D. whereas domestic structural reforms play an important role in improving both the internal and external competitiveness of EU enterprises,
E. ker je odložitev razvojne agende iz Dohe 24. julija 2006 po skoraj 5 letih pogajanj ustvarila nov položaj, v katerem mora EU nujno začasno prilagoditi prednostne naloge in instrumente svoje trgovinske politike, istočasno pa kot glavno prednostno nalogo v trgovinski politiki obdržati mnogostranskost,
E. whereas the suspension of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) on 24 July 2006, after almost five years of negotiations, has created a new situation whereby it has become necessary for the EU to temporarily adjust the priorities and instruments of its trade policy, while maintaining multilateralism as its main trading policy priority,
F. ker bi bilo treba uporabljati vse ostale instrumente, ki so na razpolago, skladno s trgovinsko politiko EU,
F. whereas all other instruments available should be used in a manner conforming with EU trade policy,
G. ker je EU že eno od najbolj odprtih gospodarstev na svetu,
G. whereas the EU is already one of the most open economies in the world,
H. ker je enotni značaj skupne trgovinske politike pomembna prednost EU, zaradi katere ima EU vidno vlogo v mednarodnem trgovinskem sistemu,
H. whereas the integrated character of the common commercial policy is an important asset for the EU and enables it to play a prominent role in the international trading system,
I. ker protekcionizem umetno ščiti neuspešne sektorje gospodarstva pred mednarodno konkurenco, odvrača sredstva od bolj produktivnih sektorjev, dviguje cene in končno povzroča nezaposlenost,
I. whereas protectionism artificially shelters inefficient sectors of the economy from international competition, diverts resources away from more productive sectors, raises prices and ultimately leads to unemployment,
J- ker so pogosti javni protesti proti razdiralnim učinkom, ki jih ima odprtje trgovine na določene regije in gospodarske sektorje, pri tem pa se prepogosto spregledajo pozitivni učinki na inovacije, konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje,
J. whereas there is often a public outcry against the disruptive impact that the opening up of trade has on certain regions and economic sectors, while its positive effects on innovation, competitiveness and employment are too often overlooked,
K. ker dostop do trga vse bolj ovirajo različne vrste netarifnih ovir,
K. whereas market access is being increasingly hampered by various types of non-tariff barrier (NTBs),
L. ker so visoke tarife še vedno pomembna ovira v trgovini, zlasti v odnosih z velikimi državami v vzponu,
L. whereas high tariffs still constitute a significant obstacle to trade, especially in relations with major emerging countries,
M. ker je mnogostranski trgovinski sistem, ki ga predstavlja Svetovna trgovinska organizacija, z razvijanjem ustreznih pravil in zagotavljanjem njihovega izpolnjevanja še naprej najbolj učinkovit okvir za pošteno in pravično trgovino na svetovni ravni,
M. whereas the multilateral trading system, embodied in the WTO, remains the most effective framework for achieving fair and equitable trade on a global basis, by developing appropriate rules and ensuring compliance with those rules,
N. ker se EU še naprej zavzema za uspeh razvojne agende iz Dohe in je že pokazala dobro voljo z vrsto smiselnih ponudb na vseh pogajalskih področjih,
N. whereas the EU remains committed to the success of the DDA and has already shown its goodwill through a series of meaningful offers in all areas of the negotiations,
O. ker bi bilo treba pod določenimi pogoji ponovno premisliti o sklenitvi dvostranskih in regionalnih sporazumov o prosti trgovini, vendar upoštevajoč, da bi bilo pretirano število takih sporazumov morda v nasprotju s krepitvijo mnogostranskega sistema, ki ga zagovarja EU,
O. whereas renewed consideration should, under certain conditions, be given to the conclusion of bilateral and regional free trade agreements (FTAs), bearing in mind, however, that an excessive proliferation of such agreements could militate against strengthening the multilateral system, of which the EU is a proponent,
P. ker je nujno opredeliti pravo ravnovesje med mnogostranskimi, dvostranskimi in večstranskimi sporazumi,
P. whereas it is essential to identify the right balance between multilateral, bilateral and plurilateral agreements,
Q. ker bi EU morala biti pripravljena, da se bo po potrebi s pomočjo mehanizmov za reševanje sporov zaščitila pred kršitvami dogovorjenih pravil, pred nepošteno trgovinsko prakso pa z izvajanjem učinkovitih in zakonitih ukrepov trgovinske zaščite, s čimer bo takoj pomagala prizadetim industrijam,
Q. whereas the EU should be prepared to defend itself, whenever necessary, against violations of agreed rules through recourse to dispute settlement mechanisms, and against unfair trading practices through the application of effective and lawful trade defence measures providing immediate relief to industries that have been harmed,
R. ker brez resnega sodelovanja Evropskega parlamenta ni mogoče izvajati verodostojne in legitimne trgovinske politike,
R. whereas no credible and legitimate trade policy can be conducted without the meaningful involvement of the Parliament,
S. ker je pomembno, da ima Parlament pravočasno dostop do besedil iz različnih pogajalskih mandatov, podeljenih Komisiji,
S. whereas it is important that the Parliament have access, in due time, to the texts of the various negotiating mandates given to the Commission;
EU v svetovni konkurenci
The EU in global competition
5. je prepričan, da socialni model, na katerem temeljijo evropski industrijski odnosi, omogoča EU, da ohranja visoko stopnjo svetovne konkurenčnosti nasproti njenim glavnim konkurentom; meni, da je največji izziv za EU obdržati delovanje tega socialnega modela kljub pritisku, ki obstaja na čedalje bolj konkurenčnih svetovnih tržiščih in teži k nadaljnjemu zmanjšanju socialnih in okoljskih stroškov proizvodnje;
Is convinced that the social model that remains at the base of European industrial relations has enabled the EU to maintain a high degree of global competitiveness vis-à-vis its main competitors; considers that the biggest challenge facing the EU is to uphold the functioning of that social model despite existing pressure, in increasingly competitive global markets, to further lower the social and environmental costs of production;
7. meni, da imajo od liberalizacije koristi večinoma tiste države, ki odstranijo tarife in netarifne ovire ter odprejo svoje trge; zato meni, da je sposobnost EU, da poveča svojo konkurenčnost, odvisna od tega, kako se bo spoprijela z vsemi ovirami za trgovino na svetovni ravni, ali bo zagotovila dokončno vzpostavitev skupnega trga in odprla svoje trge za tretje države;
Believes that the benefits of liberalisation accrue largely to those countries that lift tariff and NTBs and open their markets; considers, therefore, that the ability of the EU to increase its competitiveness is dependent upon it addressing all barriers to trade at a global level, securing the completion of the single market and opening its markets to third countries;
10. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj evropske državljane bolje seznanita z vsemi vidiki globalizacije in z dejanskimi koristmi, ki izhajajo iz sodelovanja EU v mednarodnem trgovinskem sistemu;
Invites the Commission and the Member States to better inform European citizens on all aspects of globalisation and the concrete benefits resulting from the EU’s participation in the international trading system;
12. verjame, da bi vse večja konkurenca morala spodbuditi EU k večji prizadevnosti na področju izobraževanja, raziskav in razvoja, da bi svoj položaj na svetovnem trgu inovativnih proizvodov ter visoko kvalificiranih storitev obdržala oziroma ga izboljšala z ustvarjanjem novih primerjalnih prednosti;
Believes that increased competition should prompt the EU to boost its efforts in education and in research and development in order to maintain its position on world markets for innovative products and highly skilled services and to improve its position through the creation of new comparative advantages;
16. opozarja, da je EU že eno od najbolj odprtih gospodarstev na svetu in da je zelo pripomogla k občutni širitvi svetovne trgovine v zadnjih petdesetih letih, od česar je imela tudi koristi;
Recalls that the EU is already one of the most open economies in the world and that it has greatly contributed to, and benefited from, the considerable expansion of global trade over the past fifty years;
19. se strinja s Komisijo, da svetovni trgovinski sistem ni več rezerviran le za države OECD; priporoča, da se države kot na primer Mehika vključijo na seznam držav, ki jih Komisija šteje med države v vzponu; opozarja, da države v vzponu, na primer Kitajska, Brazilija, Rusija, Indija in Mehika, že predstavljajo več kot 18 % svetovnih trgovinskih tokov;
Agrees with the Commission that the world trading system is no longer the preserve of the OECD countries; recommends, however, that countries like Mexico be integrated in the list of countries which the Commission regards as emerging; recalls that emerging countries like China, Brazil, Russia, India and Mexico already represent more that 18 % of global trade flows;
21. ugotavlja, da ima EU interes za nadaljevanje in stopnjevanje dvostranskih pogajanj z njenimi poglavitnimi razvitimi trgovinskimi partnerji, pod pogojem, da to ne ogroža okoljskih in zdravstvenih standardov EU ter da se spoštuje konvencija UNESCA o zaščiti in spodbujanju različnosti kulturnega izražanja z dne 20. oktobra 2005;
Notes the interest that the EU has in pursuing and intensifying bilateral negotiations with its main developed trading partners, provided that this does not jeopardise EU environmental and health standards and respects the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions of 20 October 2005;