natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Da bi jih lahko vključili je treba začeti razpravo o tem, kakšnega delovanja bi se državljani in države članice želeli lotiti sedaj, ko so načela, vrednote, cilji in pravila delovanja jasno opredeljeni v ustavi.
In order to mobilise public opinion, we have to launch a debate on what course of action the public and the Member States wish to pursue, now that the principles, values, objectives and operating rules have been clearly set out in the draft Constitution.
2.5.5 Zato hoče EESO v tej fazi povezati ustavno pogodbo z Lizbonsko strategijo, ki bo kmalu predmet vmesnega pregleda.
2.5.5 For this reason, the EESC would, at this stage, like to establish a link between the Constitutional Treaty and the Lisbon Strategy, which will shortly be the subject of a mid-term review.
Ta strategija bi morala biti predstavljena v razpravah, ker prinaša vizijo prihodnosti vsakega evropskega državljana: konkurencnost, polna zaposlenost, delitev znanja, naložbe v človeški kapital, rast ter ohranjanje okolja in kakovosti življenja skozi trajnostni razvoj.
The subject of the Lisbon Strategy should be introduced into the debate since it maps out a vision of the future for all citizens of the EU marked by: competitiveness, full employment; shared knowledge; investment in human resources; and growth, whilst preserving the living environment and the quality of life through sustainable development.
Danes ta strategija ne deluje, ker so instrumenti za njeno izvajanje pomanjkljivi, vlada pa tudi kronično pomanjkanje združenj državljanov in civilne družbe.
This strategy has now broken down as the implementing instruments are not up to the task and there is a chronic lack of public involvement and involvement of civil society.
Na tej stopnji je torej nujen nov impulz v obliki novih pobud Skupnosti, ki bi ekonomsko socialnemu projektu Unije vrnile verodostojnost.
At this stage, there is therefore a vital need for a fresh impulse and new Community initiatives in order to make the Union's economic and social project credible.
2.5.6 V mnenju, naslovljenem na Evropski svet
2.5.6 In the opinion which it submitted to the European Council
Vmesni pregled mora biti priložnost, ki je ne smemo zamuditi, da državljanom posredujemo jasno politično sporočilo o vsebini projekta Unije.
The forthcoming mid-term review must be seen as providing an opportunity, which cannot be missed, to pass on to the public and civil society a clear political message spelling out the content of the EU's project.
2.5.7 Treba je poskrbeti, da se državljani zavejo, da imajo, po zaslugi demokratičnih dosežkov ustave, na voljo sredstva, da sami odločajo o vsebini politik in akcij, ki jih mora Unija konkretno izvajati, da bi izpolnila njihova pričakovanja.
2.5.7 EU citizens need to be made aware of the fact that the democratic progress achieved by the draft Constitution offers them the wherewithal to decide themselves on the content of the policies and actions to be pursued in practice by the Union in order to meet their aspirations.
Reci "NE" ustavni pogodbi bi pomenilo ohraniti pogodbe takšne kot so.
Rejection of the Constitutional Treaty would therefore be tantamount to freezing the Treaties in their present form .
2.6 Mobilizirati evropsko civilno družbo pri dosežkih ustavne pogodbe in preseči njene pomanjkljivosti.
2.6 Rallying European civil society behind the achievements of the Constitutional Treaty in order to overcome its shortcomings
2.6.1 Ne smemo molčati o pomanjkljivostih sprejetega besedila ustavne pogodbe.
2.6.1 This does not mean that we should keep quiet about the shortcomings of the Constitutional Treaty in its current form.
Velikega števila zahtev civilne družbe pri svojem delu ni mogla upoštevati ne Konvencija, še manj medvladna konferenca.
A large number of the demands of civil society could not be taken into account by the Convention and still fewer by the IGC.
EESO je v mnenju z dne 24. septembra 2003
In its opinion of 24 September 2003
4 Cf. opomba 1 4 , opozoril na vrsto vrzeli v osnutku ustavnepogodbe, zlasti na:
4 Cf. footnote 1 4 , the EESC noted a wholes series of weaknesses in the Constitutional Treaty, including the following:
2.6.1.1 Nezadostnost operativnih določb za izvajanje načela participativne demokracije.
2.6.1.1 The lack of adequate operational provisions for implementing the principle of participatory democracy.
Vloga EESO ni bila dovolj okrepljena, da bi lahko zagotovili dejanski državljanski dialog.
As a result, the role of the EESC was not strengthened to the extent necessary to ensure effective civil dialogue.
2.6.1.2 Pomanjkanje določb, ki bi priznavale vlogo organizirane civilne družbe pri izvajanju načela subsidiarnosti, (predvsem funkcionalne subsidiarnosti) v protokolu o izvajanju tega načela.
2.6.1.2 The absence of provisions acknowledging the role played by organised civil society in implementing the subsidiarity principle (including functional subsidiarity) in the protocol on the application of this principle.
2.6.1.3 Pomanjkljivosti upravljanja Skupnosti na področju ekonomske politike in zaposlovanja ter odsotnost predpisov, ki bi predvidevali posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom ter EESO na tistih podrocjih, ki se v prvi vrsti nanašajo na akterje civilne družbe.
2.6.1.3 The weakness of EU governance as regards economic and employment policy and the absence of rules providing for consultation of the European Parliament and the EESC in these areas, which concern civil society players most of all.
2.6.1.4 Odsotnost obveznega posvetovanja z EESO pri izvajanju načela nediskriminacije,skupni politiki na področju azilov in priseljevanja ter na področju kulture, kljub temu, da ima Odbor strokovna znanja s teh področij.
2.6.1.4 The lack of any requirement for mandatory consultation of the EESC on application of the non-discrimination principle, the common asylum and immigration policy or culture, despite the Committee's expertise in these fields.
2.6.2 Je mar zaradi tega treba pogodbo zavrniti?
2.6.2 Does this mean then that the Treaty should be rejected?
EESO ocenjuje, da bi takšna skrajna poteza pomenila negativen signal o evropski izgradnji tako znotraj kot zunaj Unije, kjer bi se sovražne ali konkurencne sile tega neuspeha gotovo veselile.
The EESC believes that this would only make things worse and send a negative signal regarding the European venture, both within the Union and outside, where hostile or competing forces would certainly take delight in such a setback.
Po drugi strani pa meni, da je mogoče graditi na predlaganem institucionalnem okvirju ter ga izboljšati z operativnimi ukrepi:
On the contrary, the Committee feels that it is possible to build on the proposed institutional framework and improve it through operational measures:
2.6.2.1 Določbe o participativni demokraciji bi morale biti predmet vrste sporočil, ki bi opredeljevale metode posvetovanja ter vlogo EESO.
2.6.2.1 The provisions on participatory democracy should be made the subject of a series of communications defining the consultation procedures and the role of the EESC.
2.6.2.2 O vsebini evropskega zakona, ki opredeljuje postopke uveljavljanja pravice ljudske iniciative, bi se morali posvetovati s civilno družbo.
2.6.2.2 Civil society should be consulted on the content of the European law defining the procedures for implementing the right of citizens' initiative.
Na ESSO bi se torej lahko naslovilo prošnjo za raziskovalno mnenje.
The EESC could be asked to deliver an exploratory opinion on this subject.
Poleg tega bi EESO lahko podprl pobude, ki izhajajo iz civilne družbe.
It could also lend its support to civil society initiatives.
2.6.2.3 Načelo participativne demokracije bi bilo treba izvajati pri velikih strategijah Unije v prid rasti, zaposlovanja in trajnostnega razvoja.
2.6.2.3 The principle of participatory democracy should be applied to the EU's key strategies for promoting growth, employment and sustainable development.
2.6.3 V okviru sprejete ustavne pogodbe je pomembno tudi obveščati državljane o mehanizmih, ki uvajajo fleksibilnost in odpirajo vrata za korake naprej, ne da bi bilo za to treba spreminjati pogodbo:
2.6.3 Moreover, and still within the framework of the Constitutional Treaty as it has been adopted, it is also important to inform the public about how flexibility could be introduced and progress could be achieved without the need to revise the Treaty:
2.6.3.1 Države članice, ki želijo dalje v procesu evropske integracije, bodo lažje vzpostavile okrepljeno medsebojno sodelovanje.
2.6.3.1 Member States wishing to advance further down the road of European integration will find it easier to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves.
2.6.3.2 Če obstaja politična volja pri vseh državah članicah je možno poglobiti integracijo na občutljivih področjih, kjer se je ohranilo soglasje, kot sta, naprimer, področji davkov ali socialne politike.
2.6.3.2 If all the Member States express the political will to do so, it will be possible to deepen integration in sensitive areas where unanimity is still required, such as taxation or social policy, for example.
"Premostitvena klavzula " dejansko omogoča razširiti glasovanje s kvalificirano večino na ta področja.
A "bridging clause" allows qualified majority voting to be extended to these areas.
2.6.4 Z angažiranim, kritičnim in konstruktivnim pristopom bo civilna družba prispevala k dobri informiranosti državljanov ter ohranjala pritisk na vlade.
2.6.4 By opting for a committed, critical and constructive approach, organised civil society will help to ensure that citizens are well informed and will keep up the pressure on governments.
Najslabše bi bilo, če bi se v svetu politike utrdilo prepričanje, ki je na žalost zelo razširjeno, da izgradnja Evrope državljanov ne zanima.
The worst thing would be if politicians were to be confirmed in the - unfortunately widely held - view that citizens are not interested in the European venture.
Takšno razmišljanje je povsem napačno, kajti državljani od Evrope pričakujejo veliko in predvsem to, da bo pripomogla k izboljšanju njihovega vsakdanjega življenja ter jim ponudila vizijo prihodnosti.
This view is totally false because people actually expect much from Europe, in particular that it will bring improvements in their everyday life by providing a vision of their future.
2.6.5 EESO meni, da sprejetje ustavne pogodbe ni samo sebi namen, temveč da odpira vrata krepitvi participativne demokracije.
2.6.5 The EESC believes that the adoption of the Constitutional Treaty is not an end in itself.
Učinkovito obveščanje
Effective communication
EESO ocenjuje, da bo kakovost strategije obveščanja igrala odločilno vlogo pri tem kako bodo prebivalci Evrope sprejeli ustavno pogodbo.
The EESC believes that the quality of the communication strategy will be a determining factor for the adoption of the Constitutional Treaty by the people of Europe.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovitost te strategije, je potreben pragmatičen in profesionalen pristop.
A pragmatic and professional approach is therefore needed to ensure that the strategy is effective.
EESO priporoča razčlenitev strategije na naslednje štiri akcije:
The EESC recommends that the communication strategy be built around action in the following four areas:
3.1 Priprava sredstev: pripomočki za informiranje in financiranje
3.1 Provision of resources: information tools and funding
3.1.1 Kompleksnost ustavne pogodbe zahteva vnaprejšnjo pripravo pripomočkov za informiranje, ki jih bo mogoče uporabiti za začetek kampanj in organizacijo razprav.
3.1.1 The complexity of the Constitutional Treaty calls for the development of information tools that could be used, upstream of the communication process, to launch campaigns or organise debates.
3.1.2 Naloga držav clanic, ob podpori uradov za informiranje Evropskega parlamenta ter predstavništev Komisije v državah članicah, je, da pripravijo pripomočke za informiranje in jih naredijo dostopne.
3.1.2 It would be up to the Member States, with the support of the information offices of the European Parliament and the Commission representations in the Member States, to devise information tools and make them accessible.
3.1.3 Ti pripomočki imajo lahko obliko vodnikov za branje ustavne pogodbe, ki bodo prilagojeni zanimanjem različnih kategorij prebivalstva v državah članicah.
3.1.3 These tools could take the form of interpretive guides to the Constitutional Treaty, geared to the concerns of different population groups in each Member State.
Bolj ko bodo ti pripomočki narejeni "po meri", učinkoviteje jih bodo za razširjanje informacij in mobilizacijo državljanov lahko uporabljali mediji, organizacije civilne družbe, politične skupine ter regionalne in lokalne oblasti.
The more customised these tools are, the easier it would be for them to be used effectively by the media, civil society organisations, political groups and local and regional authorities in disseminating information and rallying public support.
3.1.4 Treba bo zagotoviti dovolj finančnih sredstev za izvedbo takšne strategije obveščanja, ki bo izpolnila pričakovanja državljanov.
3.1.4 The provision of adequate financial resources is necessary for the implementation of a communication strategy that meets citizens' expectations.
3.2.1 Čim bodo imeli na voljo sredstva, bodo mediji, regionalne in lokalne oblasti, politične skupine ter organizacije civilne družbe lahko odigrali vlogo informacijskih kanalov.
3.2.1 Once the requisite resources have been placed at their disposal, the media, local and regional authorities, political groups and civil society organisations will have the means to act as a conduit for information.
Lahko bodo posredovali jasna sporočila v odgovore na vprašanja, ki si jih glede ustavne pogodbe zastavlja njihovo lokalno prebivalstvo.
They will be able to convey clear messages on the implications of the Constitutional Treaty that are attuned to the concerns of their local audience.
3.2.2 V začetku bi bilo koristno opredeliti kako v posamezni državi članici dojemajo ustavno pogodbo različne kategorije ljudi, da bi lahko razmislili o vsebini sporočil, ki jih je treba posredovati.
3.2.2 Initially, it would be useful to find out, in each Member State, how the Constitutional Treaty is perceived by different population groups in order to reflect on the content of the messages to be conveyed.
Glede na te zaključke bi morala sporočila imeti za cilj preseči bojazni, ki mučijo državljane ter dati odgovore na njihova pričakovanja.
Drawing on the conclusions reached, the aim of the messages would be to overcome people's fears and respond to their expectations.
3.2.3 Prav tako je treba skrbno izbrati nosilce sporočil in sredstva za obvešcanje.
3.2.3 In addition, the message-bearers and communication media will have to be chosen carefully.
Da bi bila kampanja pluralistična, je treba vključiti raznovrstne akterje.
The involvement of a wide variety of players is essential to guarantee the pluralist nature of the campaign.
Če bodo ti blizu državljanom bo to koristilo verodostojnosti in sprejemljivosti posredovanih sporočil, zato so akcije na lokalnem in regionalnem nivoju zelo pomembne.
Moreover, their closeness to citizens will be a key factor enhancing the credibility and acceptance of the messages conveyed, hence the importance of action taken at local and regional level.
3.2.4 EESO priporoča Evropskemu parlamentu, da v vsaki državi članici sestavi delovne skupine s profesionalci za institucionalne stike z javnostjo, ki bi za vlade pripravile konkretne predloge glede akcij in sredstev, ki so potrebna za učinkovito informacijsko kampanjo v državah članicah.
3.2.4 The EESC recommends to the European Parliament that working parties be set up with institutional communication professionals in each Member State with a view to making practical proposals to governments regarding the measures and resources necessary to embark upon an effective communication campaign in the Member States.
EESO je pripravljen pomagati s svojim strokovnim znanjem na tem področju ter s podporo preko stikov, ki jih ima v državah članicah, nacionalnih ekonomsko-socialnih odborih ter podobnih organih.
The EESC is prepared to make available its expertise in this field and to offer the support of its contacts in the Member States, national ESCs and similar institutions.
3.3 Organizirati razprave, odprte za vse državljane, da bi spodbudili izmenjavo mnenj ter omogočili utrditev prepričanj
3.3 Organising debates that are open to all members of the public with a view to fostering the exchange of ideas and convincing people
3.3.1 Obvešcevalne kampanje bi morale pripeljati do pravega dialoga z državljani.
3.3.1 The communication campaigns should lead to the opening of genuine dialogue with the public.
Treba jim je ponuditi priložnost za postavljanje vprašanj in soočenje mnenj, da bi si lahko izoblikovali svoje lastno mnenje in ga tudi izrazili.
It is essential that people be offered the opportunity to ask questions and hear different arguments so that they can make and express their own judgements.
3.3.2 Takšen dialog bo možen le v decentraliziranih razpravah.
3.3.2 Such dialogue will only be possible in the context of decentralised debates.
Informacija, ki bo čim bližje državljanom, bo omogočila dati boljši odgovor na njihova vprašanja in pričakovanja ter zagotoviti demokratičnost razprave.
The closer the interface with citizens, the better the information provided will be able to respond to their expectations, answer their questions and guarantee the democratic character of the debates.
3.3.3 Tovrstnim nacionalnim in evropskim pobudam je treba nuditi logistično podporo.
3.3.3 National and European institutions must provide logistical support for these initiatives.
Nacionalni ekonomsko-socialni odbori in podobni organi bi lahko usklajevali razprave na nacionalni ravni ter sestavili koledar prireditev v navezi z EESO, ki bi jim lahko posredoval dokumentacijo ter jih povezoval z govorniki.
National economic and social councils and similar institutions could coordinate the debates at national level by establishing a calendar of events and liaising with the EESC, which could provide them with documentation and put them in touch with speakers.
3.3.4 Z namenom zagotoviti koherentnost tovrstnih pobud EESO prosi Evropski parlament in Evropsko komisijo, da bi dobile pobude predstavnikov organizirane civilne družbe enako podporo kot pobude izvoljenih in drugih predstavnikov evropskih, nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti v okviru akcije "1000 razprav o Evropi".
3.3.4 In order to ensure a degree of consistency between the initiatives, the EESC requests the European Parliament and the European Commission to ensure that initiatives by representatives of organised civil society enjoy the same support as those by elected and other representatives of European, national, regional and local bodies under the 1000 debates on Europe initiative.
Sodelovanje civilne družbe ne sme biti potisnjeno na rob.
Civil society cannot be kept on the sidelines.
3.3.5 EESO zahteva, da Evropski parlament velik del proračuna Unije, namenjenega obveščanju, nameni razpravam o ustavni pogodbi ter s tem dopolni sredstva, ki jih zagotavljajo nacionalne in lokalne javne oblasti ter lastna sredstva organizacij civilne družbe.
3.3.5 The EESC requests the European Parliament to allocate a significant proportion of the EU communication budget to the debates on the Constitutional Treaty to complement the resources of national and local public authorities and the resources at the disposal of civil society organisations.
3.4 Razpravam in ratifikaciji je treba dati evropsko razsežnost
3.4 Giving the debates and ratification a European dimension
3.4.1 Nujno se je treba izogniti temu, da bi evropsko prebivalstvo sprejetje ustavne pogojevalo le z vprašanji glede notranje-političnih tem.
3.4.1 It is essential to make sure that the adoption of the Constitutional Treaty by the people of Europe is not determined solely by domestic policy issues.
3.4.2 V tem kontekstu EESO priporoča, da se razpravam in ratifikaciji ustavne pogodbe da resnično nadnacionalno razsežnost:
3.4.2 Therefore the EESC recommends that the debates and the ratification of the Constitutional Treaty be given a truly transnational dimension:
EESO bi lahko, naprimer, na evropski ravni lajšal izmenjavo dobrih praks (in znanja) med organizacijami civilne družbe, ki bi sodelovale v obveščevalnih kampanjah.
For example, the EESC could promote the exchange of good practice (and know-how) at European level between civil society organisations involved in communication activities.
Prav tako bi lahko vzpostavil sistem posredovanja informacij, ki bi omogočal na evropski ravni oceniti predloge, kritike ter priporočila, ki jih podajajo državljani v okviru razprav, ki jih organizira civilna družba.
It could also establish feedback arrangements for evaluating, at European level, proposals, criticisms and recommendations put forward by members of the public during debates organised by civil society.
Na koncu bi lahko podprl tudi čezmejne in večnacionalne pobude.
Finally, the EESC stands ready to support cross-border or multi-national initiatives.
3.4.2.2 Po drugi strani EESO podpira predlog komisije za ustavne zadeve Evropskega parlamenta, da ratifikacije, ce je to le možno, potekajo okrog nekega simboličnega datuma (kot je naprimer 8. ali 9. maj).
3.4.2.2 Furthermore, the EESC endorses the proposal by the European Parliament's Committee on Constitutional Affairs to hold the ratifications on or around a symbolic date (such as 8 or 9 May), insofar as is possible.
3.4.3 EESO se torej zavzema za tvorno sodelovanje evropskih institucij pri pripravi in izvedbi strategije obveščanja o ustavni pogodbi.
3.4.3 Therefore the EESC calls for active involvement by the European Institutions in the drawing up and implementation of the communication strategy on the Constitutional Treaty.
Treba se je pridružiti prizadevanjem držav članic in Evropa mora državljanom dati močan in pozitiven signal.
It is important to work alongside the Member States and to send out a strong and positive signal to citizens about Europe.
3.4.4 EESO se zavezuje, da bo evropski civilni družbi posredoval jasna sporocila o demokraticnih pridobitvah ustavne pogodbe zlasti na področju državljanstva in udeležbe..
3.4.4 For its part, the EESC undertakes to convey clear messages to European civil society about the democratic achievements of the Constitutional Treaty, in terms of, inter alia, citizenship and participation.
V Bruslju, 28. oktobra 2004.
Brussels, 28 October 2004.
MNENJE ODBORA REGIJ
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
Bruselj, 22 novembra 2004
Brussels 22 November 2004
Odbora Regij
of the Committee of the Regions
z dne 17 novembra 2004
of 17 November 2004
ODBOR REGIJ,
THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS,
Ob upoštevanju osnutka poročila Odbora Evropskega parlamenta za ustavne zadeve o Pogodbi o ustavi za Evropo (PE 347.119),
Having regard to the draft report of the European Parliament's Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (PE 347.119),
Ob upoštevanju sklepa Evropskega parlamenta dne 14. septembra 2004, da v skladu s členom 265 (4) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti Odbor zaprosi za mnenje;
Having regard to the decision of the European Parliament of 14 September 2004 to consult it on this matter, under the fourth paragraph of Article 265 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo, ki so jo voditelji držav in vlad podpisali 29. oktobra 2004 (CIG 87/2/04 rev 2, CIG 87/04 add.
Having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe signed by heads of State or government on 29 October 2004 (CIG 87/2/04 rev 2, CIG 87/04 Add.
1 rev 1 in add.
1 rev 1 and Add.
Ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Laeknu dne 14. in 15. decembra 2001, predvsem laekenske izjave o prihodnosti Evropske unije,
Having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Laeken European Council of 14 and 15 December 2001, and in particular the Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union,
Ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Bruslju dne 17. in 18. junija 2004,
Having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 17 and 18 June 2004,