natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Del kompromisnega sporazuma sta tehnični spremembi členov, ki zadevata oceno in revizijo členov (20 in 21), da se pojasni postopke in spoštovanje pravice Komisije do pobude.
Two technical amendments make part of the compromise as regard the evaluation and review articles (Art.20 and 21), in order to clarify the procedures and to respect the Commission's right of initiative.
K priporočilu je priložena tudi skupna izjava Sveta, Parlamenta in Komisije, v kateri je pojasnjeno, da doseženi sporazum Sveta in Parlamenta temelji na posebnosti Inštituta in ne bo vplival na ustanovitev novih agencij v prihodnosti.
A joint statement by the Council, the Parliament and the Commission is attached to the present recommendation, in order to clarify that the agreement reached by the Council and the Parliament is determined by the Institute's specific nature and is not therefore considered as a precedent for any future Agency.
Skupno stališče Sveta za sprejetje uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega inštituta za enakost med spoloma
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Institute for Gender Equality
o predlogu priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu glede pogajanj o okvirnem sklepu o varstvu podatkov v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the progress of the negotiations on the framework decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU (B6‑0618/2006)................................................................7
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION (B6‑0618/2006)..................................................8
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga je vložila Martine Roure v imenu skupine PSE glede pogajanj o okvirnem sklepu o varstvu osebnih podatkov v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah ( B6‑0618/2006 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Martine Roure on behalf of the PSE Group on the progress of the negotiations on the framework decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters ( B6‑0618/2006 ),
– - ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 27. septembra 2006
– having regard to its position of 27 September 2006
Sprejeta besedila na ta dan, P6_TA((2006)0370.
Texts Adopted for that date, P6_TA(2006)0370 . ,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja delovne skupine nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov (člen 29 direktive 95/46/ES) in mnenja evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov
– having regard to the opinions of the national authorities’ Data Protection Working Party (Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC) and the European Data Protection Supervisor
– ob upoštevanju konvencije št. 108 Sveta Evrope o zaščiti posameznikov pri avtomatski obdelavi osebnih podatkov,
– having regard to Council of Europe Convention No 108 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data,
– ob upoštevanju konvencije o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike, in sicer kar zadeva postopno odpravo kontrol na skupnih mejah
– having regard to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders
– ob upoštevanju mnenj Konference nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov in evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov,
- having regard to the opinions of the conference of national data protection authorities and the European Data Protection Supervisor,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0456/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0456/2006 ),
A. ker se je Svet držal obveze, ki jo je sprejel 27. septembra 2006 v Evropskem parlamentu, in pospešil potek razprav o predlogu okvirnega sklepa o varstvu podatkov pri policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah ter je tik pred dosego soglasja o besedilu,
A. whereas the Council has fulfilled an undertaking made before Parliament on 27 September 2006 by stepping up the pace of discussions on the proposal for a framework decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, and whereas it is apparently close to reaching an agreement on that text,
B. ker kaže, da se kljub obvezi predsedstva, sprejeti 27. septembra 2006 v Evropskem parlamentu, med pogajanji, ki potekajo v Svetu, ni upoštevalo prej omenjenega, soglasno sprejetega mnenja Evropskega parlamenta,
B. whereas, despite the undertaking given by the Presidency in Parliament on 27 September 2006, it does not appear that Parliament’s position – unanimously adopted – has been taken into account in the negotiations taking place in the Council,
C. ker se Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov ni obveščalo o poteku pogajanj v Svetu,
C. whereas the European Parliament and the national parliaments have not been kept informed of the progress of negotiations in the Council,
D. ker imajo nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov zadržke in so v izjavi, sprejeti 2. novembra 2006 v Londonu, zahtevali vzpostavitev skladnega okvira za varstvo podatkov, ki se izmenjujejo bodisi na nacionalni ravni bodisi med državami članicami ali s tretjimi državami,
D. having regard to the reserved opinions expressed by the national data protection authorities and to their declaration issued in London on 2 November 2006, in which they called for the establishment of a coherent framework for protecting data exchanged within Member States, between Member States or with non-EU countries,
E. ker se mnenja evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov in konference nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov očitno niso upoštevala pri pogajanjih, ki so potekala v Svetu,
E. whereas the opinions of the European Data Protection Supervisor and the conference of national data protection authorities do not appear to have been taken into account in the negotiations in the Council,
F. ker je izredno zaskrbljen zaradi poteka razprav v Svetu, saj se države članice očitno nagibajo k sporazumu, ki bo temeljil na najnižjem skupnem imenovalcu na področju varstva podatkov; je nadalje zaskrbljen, da bo stopnja varstva podatkov nižja od tiste, ki jo zagotavljata direktiva 95/46/ES in konvencija št. 108 Sveta Evrope, in da bo izvajanje morebitnega sporazuma imelo negativne posledice za splošno načelo varstva podatkov v državah članicah Evropske unije, hkrati pa ne bo vzpostavljenega zadostnega varstva na evropski ravni;
F. extremely concerned at the direction being taken by the debate in the Council, with Member States appearing to be moving towards a data protection agreement based on the lowest common denominator; fearing, moreover, that the level of data protection will be lower than that provided by Directive 95/46/EC and Council of Europe Convention No 108 and that implementation of such an agreement might have a negative impact on the general principle of data protection in each Member State without establishing a satisfactory level of protection at European level,
G. ker bi besedilo okvirnega sklepa, o katerem se trenutno razpravlja v Svetu, uvedlo različna pravila o zaščiti podatkov, in sicer pravila, ki jih izvajajo države, vključene v schengensko območje, ter pravila držav članic, ki niso del območja, razlike pa bi pripeljale do neskladnosti v standardih zaščite podatkov v okviru EU,
G. whereas the framework decision currently being discussed by the Council would establish different data protection rules, i.e. those applied by the Schengen states and those applied by the non-Schengen states, and whereas these differences would result in inconsistent data protection standards within the European Union,
H. ker je ta predlog okvirnega sklepa tesno povezan z uvedbo načela dostopnosti, ki je prednostni cilj haaškega programa;
H. whereas the proposed framework decision is closely linked to the establishment of the availability principle, which is a priority of the Hague Programme,
I. ker opozarja, da mora predlog okvirnega sklepa v določenem roku nadomestiti prej omenjeno konvencijo št. 108 Sveta Evrope na tak način, da zagotovi Evropski uniji primerno orodje za varstvo podatkov v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja;
I. recalling that the proposed framework decision should in due course replace Council of Europe Convention No 108 by giving the EU its own instrument for data protection in the framework of police and judicial cooperation,
a) z oblikovanjem zakonodajnega okvira za varovanje osebnih podatkov se zagotovi visoko raven zaščite temeljnih pravic evropskih državljanov na področjih, ki jih pokriva naslov VI Pogodbe o EU,
(a) ensure a high level of protection of European citizens’ fundamental rights by establishing a legal framework to protect personal data in the areas covered by Title VI of the EU Treaty;
b) zagotovi se najosnovnejšo in usklajeno zaščito podatkov in na ta način prispeva k izboljšanju evropskega policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja ter h krepitvi zaupanja med pristojnimi organi držav članic,
(b) help to enhance European police and judicial cooperation and mutual trust between the competent authorities of the Member States by ensuring a minimum harmonised level of data protection;
c) zagotovi se, da okvirni sklep uvede visoko raven varstva podatkov v vseh državah članicah in tako prispeva k evropski dodani vrednosti;
(c) ensure that the framework decision will bring European added value by guaranteeing a high level of data protection in all Member States;
e) spoštuje se načela namembnosti in sorazmernosti, ki predvidevajo, da mora biti vsako poseganje v zasebno življenje državljana resnično potrebno in utemeljeno, in da je treba pri vsaki poznejši obdelavi podatkov upoštevati, zakaj so bili ti prvotno sploh zbrani, v skladu s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice;
(e) ensure observance of the purpose-specification and proportionality principles under which any interference in the private lives of individuals must be necessary and justified and any further processing of data must be in keeping with the purpose for which they were initially collected, in accordance with European Court of Human Rights case law;
f) določi se široko področje uporabe okvirnega sklepa, ki zajema tudi varstvo podatkov pri obdelavi na ravni države; namen tega varstva je namreč enak namenu direktive 95/46/ES, in sicer nuditi državljanom visoko raven varstva znotraj območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter odpraviti razlike, ki obstajajo med ravnmi varovanja pravic oseb in med ravnmi varstva datotek ter sistemov podatkov, kar ovira prenos in izmenjavo podatkov med državami članicami;
(f) give the framework decision a broad scope, including data protection in the context of national processing, the objective of which is the same as that of Directive 95/46/EC, i.e. to provide citizens with a high degree of protection within an area of freedom, security and justice and to abolish disparities between levels of protection of individuals' rights and levels of security of files and data systems which hinder the transmission and exchange of data between Member States;
Minimalni standardi pri varovanju podatkov v okviru posebnega policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja
Minimum data protection standards in the specific context of police and judicial cooperation
g) ne sme se sprejeti besedila, ki ne bi nagradilo direktive 95/46/ES in omenjene konvencije št. 108 Sveta Evrope, ki je za države članice pravno zavezujoča, in bi ogrozilo obstoječe standarde pri zaščiti podatkov, še zlasti kar zadeva:
(g) not weaken existing data protection standards by adopting a text that falls short of Directive 95/46/EC and Council of Europe Convention No 108, which is legally binding on Member States, and in particular:
– ohranitev pravice zadevnih oseb do obveščenosti in do vpogleda v podatke ter pravice do pritožbe v skladu s členom 5, točko a), in členom 8 konvencije št. 108,
- maintain data subjects’ right of information and access to data and right of appeal in accordance with Articles 5(a) and 8 of Convention No 108;
– vzdrževanje visoke stopnje varovanja občutljivih podatkov v skladu z obstoječimi standardi iz prvega stebra, da bi tako prevladalo načelo prepovedi uporabe posebnih kategorij podatkov, usklajenih z omejenimi izjemami; zagotavljanje zelo visoke ravni zaščite pri obdelavi biometričnih podatkov in podatkov, povezanih z DNK,
- maintain a high level of protection for sensitive data, in keeping with existing first-pillar standards, and ensure that the principle of a ban on the use of particular categories of data, with limited exceptions, applies; ensure a very high level of data protection in connection with the processing of biometric and DNA-related data;
– ohranjanje ločevanja med različnimi vrstami podatkov (podatki o žrtvah, osumljencih, pričah itd.), da zagotovili obdelavo podatkov in različne in posebne vidike njihove zaščite glede na njihovo vrsto, zlasti v zvezi z osebami, ki niso osumljenci,
- maintain the distinction between different types of data (data on victims, suspects, witnesses, etc.), so as to allow different and specific processing of and guarantees for different types of data, particularly as regards non-suspects;
h) upošteva se, da prevelika razlika na ravni varstva podatkov med prvim in tretjim stebrom ne bi imela negativnih učinkov le na pravice državljanov do varstva podatkov, ampak tudi na medsebojno zaupanje držav članic in učinkovitost policijskega dela,
(h) recognise that an excessive disparity in data protection levels between the first and third pillars would have a negative impact not only on citizens’ right to data protection but also on mutual trust between Member States and on the effectiveness of police work;
i) zagotovi se kakovost podatkov, pri čemer se posreduje le nesporno točne podatke, in to na predhodno in utemeljeno zahtevo pristojnega organa,
(i) guarantee data quality: only data presumed to be accurate should be transmitted in response to a duly substantiated prior request from the competent authority;
j) zagotovi se izvajanje evropskih standardov glede zaupnosti podatkov,
(j) ensure the implementation of European data confidentiality standards;
Obdelava in nadaljnje posredovanje podatkov
Further processing and transfer of data
k) določi se omejitve in posebna jamstva pri nadaljnji obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov organom, ki niso pristojni organi, pri čemer je treba ohraniti načelo namembnosti,
(k) establish limits and specific guarantees for the further processing of data and the transfer of data to authorities other than the competent authorities, while ensuring that the purpose-specification principle is observed;
l) vztraja se pri tem, da je v področje uporabe okvirnega sklepa treba vključiti izmenjavo podatkov s pristojnimi organi tretjih držav in, če je potrebno, s pogajanji za dosego ustreznih mednarodnih sporazumov zagotoviti primerno raven varstva podatkov; prav tako je treba oceniti kakovost podatkov, ki jih posredujejo tretje države, med drugim ob upoštevanju zaščite osnovnih pravic,
(l) ensure that the exchange of data with the competent authorities of non-EU countries is included in the scope of the framework decision with a view to ensuring, if necessary by negotiating appropriate international agreements, an adequate level of data protection; also ensure that the quality of data received from non-EU countries is assessed, including from the standpoint of the protection of fundamental rights;
m) predvidi se posebna jamstva pri posredovanju in uporabi podatkov, ki so jih zbrale zasebne stranke in ki se jih obdela za namene državnih organov, ter sankcije, med njimi tudi kazni, za vsako neustrezno uporabo podatkov,
(m) establish specific guarantees regarding the transfer and use of data collected by private parties and processed by public authorities; establish sanctions, including criminal penalties, for any misuse of data processed in this context;
Posebne opombe
Specific observations
4. ponavlja svojo zahtevo po tem, da se Evropski parlament in nacionalne parlamente v polni meri vključi v razprave, ki potekajo v Svetu, in da se upošteva soglasno sprejeto mnenje Parlamenta,
Reiterates its call for the European Parliament and the national parliaments to be fully involved in the discussions in progress in the Council and for the opinion unanimously adopted by the European Parliament to be taken into consideration;
9. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu in v vednost Komisiji, parlamentom in vladam držav članic ter Svetu Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the Commission, the Parliaments and Governments of the Member States and the Council of Europe.
ki ga v skladu s členom 114(1) uredbe
pursuant to Rule 114(1) of the Rules of Procedure
o varstvu osebnih podatkov v okviru policijskega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah
on data protection in the context of police cooperation in criminal matters
– ob upoštevanju svojega poročila, sprejetega 27. septembra 2006
– having regard to its report adopted on 27 September 2006
– ob upoštevanju mnenja delovne skupine nacionalnih organov za varstvo osebnih podatkov (direktiva 95/46/ES, člen 29) in mnenja evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov
– having regard to the opinions of the national authorities’ Data Protection Working Party (Directive 95/46/EC, Article 29) and the European Data Protection Supervisor
– ob upoštevanju konvencije št. 108 Sveta Evrope o varstvu posameznikov glede avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov,
– having regard to Council of Europe Convention No 108 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data,
– ob upoštevanju konvencije o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah
– having regard to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders
A. ker se je Svet držal obveze, sprejete 27. septembra 2006 v Evropskem parlamentu, in pospešil potek razprav o predlogu okvirnega sklepa o varstvu podatkov pri policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah ter je tik pred dosego soglasja o tem besedilu,
A. whereas the Council has fulfilled an undertaking made before Parliament on 27 September 2006 by stepping up the pace of discussions on the proposal for a framework decision on data protection in the context of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, and whereas it is apparently close to reaching an agreement on that text,
B. ker kaže, da kljub obvezi predsedstva, sprejeti 27. septembra 2006 v Evropskem parlamentu, Svet v okviru svojih pogajanj ni upošteval mnenja Evropskega parlamenta, čeprav je bilo to soglasno sprejeto,
B. whereas, despite the undertaking given by the Presidency in Parliament on 27 September 2006, it does not appear that Parliament’s opinion – unanimously adopted – has been taken into account in the negotiations taking place in the Council,
C. ker Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti niso bili redno obveščeni o poteku pogajanj v Svetu,
C. whereas the European Parliament and the national parliaments have not been kept informed of the progress of negotiations in the Council,
D. ker so nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov podali zadržana mnenja in ker v izjavi, ki so jo podpisali 2. novembra 2006 v Londonu, zahtevajo vzpostavitev skladnega okvira za varstvo podatkov, ki se izmenjujejo bodisi na nacionalni ravni bodisi med državami članicami ali s tretjimi državami,
D. having regard to the reserved opinions expressed by the national data protection authorities and to their declaration issued in London on 2 November 2006, in which they called for the establishment of a coherent framework for protecting data exchanged at national level, between Member States or with non-EU countries,
E. ker je izjemno zaskrbljen nad potekom razprave v Svetu,
E. having regard to its extreme concern at the direction of the debate in the Council,
a) obžaluje, da se države članice na področju varstva podatkov nagibajo k sporazumu, ki bo temeljil na najnižjem skupnem imenovalcu; izraža zaskrbljenost, da bo v državah članicah Evropske unije izvajanje sporazuma imelo nasprotne, negativne posledice na splošno načelo varstva podatkov, pri tem pa se ne bo vzpostavilo zadostnega varstva na evropski ravni;
(a) regrets that Member States are moving towards a data protection agreement based on the lowest common denominator; fears, moreover, that the implementation of that agreement will have a negative impact on the general principle of data protection in EU Member States without establishing a satisfactory level of protection at European level;
b) opozarja, da mora omenjeni predlog okvirnega sklepa končno nadomestiti konvencijo št. 108 Sveta Evrope o varstvu podatkov; vendar ocenjuje, da je besedilo, o katerem trenutno razpravlja Svet, slabše od konvencije št. 108 in utegne oslabiti obstoječe standarde na področju varstva podatkov; želi, da okvirni sklep zagotovi visoko raven varstva podatkov v vseh državah članicah in tako prispeva k evropski dodani vrednosti;
(b) recalls that the proposed framework decision should in due course replace Council of Europe Convention No 108 on data protection; considers, however, that the text currently being discussed in the Council falls short of Convention No 108 and risks undermining existing data protection standards; hopes that the framework decision will bring European added value by ensuring a high level of data protection in all Member States;
c) zato meni, da bi predlagani okvirni sklep glede na trenutno stanje pogajanj v Svetu povzročil nedoslednosti v nekaterih standardih varstva podatkov med državami podpisnicami konvencije o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma, ki uporabljajo konvencijo št. 108, in tistimi državami, ki niso podpisnice te konvencije;
(c) considers that, as the negotiations stand in the Council, the proposed framework decision would create inconsistencies in certain data protection standards between states that are signatories to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, which implement Convention No 108, and those that are not signatories;
d) želi, da bi imel okvirni sklep široko področje uporabe, ki bi zajemalo tudi varstvo podatkov pri obdelavi v okviru države; namen tega varstva je namreč enak namenu direktive 95/46/ES: državljanom nuditi visoko raven varstva v območju svobode, varnosti in pravice ter odpraviti razlike, ki obstajajo med ravnmi varstva pravic oseb in med ravnmi varstva datotek ter sistemov podatkov, ki ovirajo prenos in izmenjavo podatkov med različnimi državami članicami;
(d) hopes that the framework decision will have a broad scope, including data protection in the context of national processing, the objective of which is the same as that of Directive 95/46/EC, i.e. to provide citizens with a high degree of protection within an area of freedom, security and justice and to abolish disparities between levels of protection of people’s rights and levels of security of files and data systems which hinder the transmission and exchange of data between Member States;