natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če pa v eni od družb, ki se združujejo, predstavniki zaposlenih obsegajo vsaj tretjino upravnega ali nadzornega organa, omejitev ne sme biti takšna, da je delež predstavnikov zaposlenih v upravnem organu nižji od ene tretjine.
However, if in one of the merging companies employee representatives comprised at least one third of the administrative or supervisory board, the limitation may never result in a lower proportion of employee representatives in the administrative organ than one ‑third.
Razširitev pravice soodločanja na zaposlene v družbi, ki nastane s čezmejno združitvijo, ki so zaposleni v drugih državah članicah, v skladu z drugo alineo odstavka 2, državam članicam, ki se za to odločijo, ne nalaga nikakršnih obveznosti do upoštevanja teh zaposlenih pri izračunavanju minimalnega števila delavcev, potrebnega za uveljavljanje pravice do soodločanja v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
The extension of participation entitlements to employees of the company resulting from the cross ‑border merger employed in other Member States, referred to in the second indent of paragraph 2 above, does not entail any obligation for Member States which choose to do so to take those employees into account when calculating the size of workforce thresholds giving rise to participation rights under national law.
Če vsaj v eni od družb, ki sodelujejo v čezmejni združitvi, obstaja sistem soodločanja zaposlenih in če bo za družbo, ki nastane s čezmejno združitvijo, veljal takšen sistem v skladu s pravili iz odstavka 2 zgoraj, ta družba obvezno prevzame takšno pravno obliko, ki omogoča uveljavljanje pravic do soodločanja.
When at least one of the merging companies is operating under an employee participation system and the company resulting from the cross ‑border merger is to be governed by such a system according to the rules referred to in paragraph 2 above, that company shall obligatorily take a legal form allowing for the exercise of participation rights.
Predlog sporazumne spremembe povezuje predloge sprememb iz odbora za pravne zadeve in se hkrati ujema s sporazumnim besedilom, ki ga je sprejel Svet.
The compromise amendment brings together the amendments tabled in the Legal Affairs Committee and has the same wording as the compromise reached in the Council.
Pet let po datumu, določenem v členu 15(1), pregleda Komisija to direktivo na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih pri njeni uporabi, in predlaga revizijo, če je potrebno.
Five years after the date laid down in Article 15 first subparagraph, the Commission shall examine this Directive in the light of the experience acquired in applying it and, if necessary, propose its revision.
Na novo dodan člen vsebuje obveznost, v skladu s katero pregleda Komisija Direktivo po petih letih po začetku njene veljavnosti.
This new article requires the Commission to examine the Directive five years after its entry into force.
Člen 15, odstavka 1 in 2
Article 15, paragraphs 1 and 2
Države članice izdajo potrebne zakone in druge predpise , potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje v roku osemnajstih mesecev po njeni objavi .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive within eighteen months of its publication.
Besedilo teh pravnih predpisov in korelacijsko tabelo med navedenimi pravnimi predpisi in to direktivo takoj sporočijo Komisiji.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof and communicate a table of equivalence between those provisions and this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo najpozneje do ...*) .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than ...*
Pri sprejemu teh predpisov se države članice sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
When Member States adopt such measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of their official publication.
Način sklicevanja določijo države članice.
The procedure for such a reference shall be adopted by Member States.
Države članice se v sprejetih predpisih sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
When Member States adopt such measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of their official publication.
* 24 mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te direktive.
* (twenty four months after its entry into force)
Korelacijska tabela v zvezi z obveščanjem o izvajanju ni več vključena v ta člen, ampak je navedena v uvodni izjavi 11 b (novo).
The addition of a table of equivalence to the notification of implementation has been removed from this article and has been included in Recital 11b (new).
MNENJE ODBORA ZA ZAPOSLOVANJE IN SOCIALNE ZADEVE
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
za Odbor za pravne zadeve
for the Committee on Legal Affairs
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o čezmejnih združitvah gospodarskih družb z delniškim kapitalom
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on cross-border mergers of companies with share capital
18. februarja 2004 je Odbor za zaposlovanje skoraj soglasno glasoval za sprejetje mnenja gospoda Menrada o predlogu Komisije o čezmejnih združitvah.
On 18 February 2004 the Employment Committee voted almost unanimously in favour of Mr Menrad's opinion on the Commission proposal on cross-border mergers.
Zdaj ko imamo novega zakonodajalca, moramo ponovno izraziti svoje stališče o tej zadevi.
Now, that we have a new legislator we have to express our position on that subject again.
Vaš pripravljavec osnutka bi zaradi strokovnega znanja gospoda Menrada rad nadaljeval njegovo delo ter hkrati upošteval nove prvine, ki so se pojavile med razpravo v Svetu, in nepričakovano hiter napredek v Svetu v zvezi z dokumentacijo.
Your draftsman would like to follow the work done by Mr Menrad because of his expertise and at the same time take into consideration the new elements which have emerged during the discussion in the Council and the unexpectedly quick progress the dossier has made within the Council.
Ključna težava: Sodelovanje delavcev
The key problem: Workers' participation
Cilj direktive je zapolniti pomembno praznino na področju prava gospodarskih družb tako, da se olajša združevanje družb z delniškim kapitalom iz različnih držav članic.
The aim of the directive is to close an important gap in company law by facilitating the merger of companies with share capital from different Member States.
V skladu s sedanjo zakonodajo Skupnosti takšne združitve niso dovoljene v vseh državah članicah.
Under current Community law, not all Member States permit such mergers.
Razlike med pravnimi sistemi različnih držav članic, ki veljajo za družbe, ki se združujejo, so včasih tako velike, da morajo družbe uporabiti zapletene in drage začasne pravne rešitve.
The differences between the legal systems of the various Member States to which the merging companies are subject are sometimes so great that the companies currently have to resort to complex and costly ad hoc legal solutions.
Zato so združitve pogosto zelo tvegane in včasih ne zagotavljajo potrebne preglednosti in pravne varnosti.
This often makes such mergers a risky undertaking, and they do not always take place with the required transparency and legal certainty.
Pri združitvah podjetij iz različnih držav članic veliko podjetij ali celo vsa ne obstajajo več kot avtonomen pravni subjekt.
When undertakings from different Member States merge, many (or even all) of them disappear as autonomous legal entities.
Družba, ki nastane z združitvijo, pa lahko prosto izbira, kje bo imela svoj sedež.
The company resulting from the merger may, however, freely choose where to have its registered establishment.
Glavni pomislek glede združevanja družb iz različnih držav članic je bila zaskrbljenost, da bi lahko družbe iz držav članic, ki zagotavljajo pravico sodelovanja delavcev
The main objection to the merger of companies from differing Member States has been the fear that companies from Member States where a right to worker participation
Takšni sistemi obstajajo v javnem in tudi zasebnem sektorju v 12 od 25 držav članic EU: na Nizozemskem, Danskem, Švedskem in Finskem.
Such systems exist in both the public and private sectors in 12 of the 25 EU Member States: Germany, Austria, Luxembourg, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Hungary, Poland, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and Finland.
V Franciji, na Irskem, Malti, v Litvi in Grčiji je takšna praksa predpisana samo za podjetja v državni lasti.
In France, Ireland, Malta, Lithuania and Greece such practices are prescribed only for state-owned firms.
Druge države članice (ZK, Italija, Belgija, Ciper, Estonija, Latvija, Španija in Portugalska) nimajo predpisov o soodločanju. , zlorabile ta postopek, da bi se izognile temu pravilu.
The other Member States (the UK, Italy, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, Spain and Portugal) have no rules on co-determination. exists might misuse this procedure in order to evade this rule.
Vaš pripravljavec mnenja ocenjuje, da Statut evropske družbe (SE)
Your draftsman estimates that the statute for a European Company (SE)
Uredba (ES) 2157/2001 in Direktiva 2001/86/ES. ponuja rešitev tega vprašanja in da bo prispeval k zaključku več kot 20-letne razprave in odpravil zastoj.
Regulation (EC) 2157/2001 and Directive 2001/86/EC offer a solution to this issue and will finally bring to an end the more than 20 year lasting debate and stalemate.
Naslednje pobude za predlog Komisije so bistvene:
The following suggestions to the Commission proposal are regarded as essential:
Predlog Komisije za člen 14 navaja, da za družbo, ki nastane z združitvijo, velja nacionalna zakonodaja o sodelovanju.
The Commission Proposal for Article 14 says that national law on participation governs the company resulting from the merger.
Če ne obstaja nacionalna zakonodaja o sodelovanju in če vsaj za eno od družb, ki se združujejo, veljajo pravila sodelovanja, predlog Komisije zahteva, da se uporabi sistem iz Uredbe in Direktive SE, da bi se zavarovalo pridobljene pravice zaposlenih.
Where there is no national law on participation and when at least one of the merging companies is governed by participation rules, the Commission proposal requires that the system set up by the SE Regulation and Directive should apply to protect the acquired rights of the employees.
Vendar pa s tem ne bi bile ustrezno urejene okoliščine, v katerih nacionalna zakonodaja, ki velja za družbo, ki je nastala z združitvijo, predvideva različen delež ali raven sodelovanja od deleža ali ravni, ki je zagotovljena zaposlenim v vsaj eni od družb, ki se združujejo.
However, this would not adequately provide for the situation where the national law governing the company resulting from the merger provides for a different proportion or level of participation than that enjoyed by the employees of at least one of the merging companies.
V skladu s tem predlagano spremenjeno besedilo člena 14(2) predvideva, da če nacionalna zakonodaja, ki velja za družbo, ki je nastala z združitvijo, ne zagotavlja enake ravni sodelovanja, kot jo imajo zaposleni v družbah, ki se združujejo, veljajo pravila SE.
Accordingly, the proposed amended text of Article 14(2) provides that, where the national law governing the company resulting from the merger does not afford a level of participation equivalent to that enjoyed by the employees of the merging companies, the SE rules will apply.
Pozornost je treba posvetiti tudi varstvu pravic do sodelovanja zaposlenih v družbi, ki se združuje, v eni državi članici, ki po združitvi postanejo zaposleni v novi družbi, registrirani v drugi državi članici, če zakonodaja druge države članice ne predvideva sodelovanja zaposlenih zunaj svoje pristojnosti.
Attention has to be taken also on the protection of the participation rights of the employees of a merging company in one Member State who, following the merger, become employees of a new company registered in another Member State, where the laws of that second Member State do not provide for the participation of employees outside its own jurisdiction.
Predlagano spremenjeno besedilo členov 14(2) in 14(4) si prizadeva vzpostaviti ravnovesje med varstvom pravic zaposlenih v drugi državi članici in zahtevami nacionalne zakonodaje o pragovih.
The proposed amended text, in Articles 14(2) and 14(4), seeks to strike a balance between the protection of the rights of employees based in another Member State and the requirements of national law on thresholds.
Dolžina pogajanj bi lahko v nekaterih okoliščinah ogrozila čezmejna združevanja.
The length of the negotiation process could, in certain circumstances, pose a deterrent to cross‑border mergers.
Zato je treba proučiti različico postopka v skladu z modelom SE, ki bi družbam, ki se združujejo, omogočala, da neposredno sprožijo uporabo standardnih pravil brez predhodnih pogajanj (prva alinea člena 14(3)).
Accordingly, a variation of the procedure under the SE model has to be considered, which would enable the merging companies to directly trigger the application of the standard rules without prior negotiation (Article 14(3), first indent).
Podobno bi lahko poseben pogajalski organ, če je ustanovljen, odločal o uporabi pravila sodelovanja za družbo, ki je nastala z združitvijo, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati nekatera pravila.
Similarly, if a special negotiating body (SNB) is established, that SNB may decide to apply the rule on participation governing the company resulting from the merger, subject to certain rules.
Ta postopek je podoben postopku iz direktive SE in je določen v drugi alinei člena 14(3).
This procedure is also analogous to that in the SE Directive, and is set out in Article 14(3), second indent.
Pripravljavec osnutka predlaga, da mora biti družba, ki nastane z združitvijo, takšne vrste, da omogoča sodelovanje delavcev.
The draftsman suggests that the company resulting from the merger must be of a form that can accommodate employee participation.
Predlagano spremenjeno besedilo obravnava to vprašanje v členu 14(5).
The proposed amended text addresses this in Article 14(5).
V predlogu Komisije ni bila upoštevana možnost izgube pravic zaposlenih do sodelovanja zaradi združitve z drugo družbo v isti državi članici.
The Commission proposal did not take in account the possibility of employees losing rights to participation as a result of a subsequent merger with another company in the same Member State.
Predlog pripravljavca za člen 14(6) temelji na členu 11 direktive SE in predvideva ukrepe za varstvo pridobljenih pravic zaposlenih v okviru čezmejnih združitev.
The draftsman proposal for Article 14(6) is based upon Article 11 of the SE Directive and provides for measures to protect the acquired rights of employees in the context of cross‑border mergers.
Predlagana tretja alinea člena 14(3) si prizadeva upoštevati okoliščine v tistih državah članicah, ki imajo samo enotirni sistem upravljanja.
The proposed Article 14(3), third indent, aims at taking into account the situation in those Member States with only a one‑tier system of management.
Če države članice ne bi smele uvesti najvišje meje, ki znaša 1/3 članov upravnega odbora, ki predstavljajo zaposlene, bi zaradi uporabe standardnih pravil lahko prišlo do takšnih razmer, v katerih bi polovica članov odbora predstavljala zaposlene, ker je bilo takšno razmerje uveljavljeno v nadzornem svetu ene od družb, ki se združujejo.
If Member States were not allowed to introduce a maximum limit of 1/3 of the members of the administrative board representing employees, the operation of the standard rules could lead to situations where half of the members of the board would be employees' representatives, because that proportion existed in the supervisory board of one of the merging companies.
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
UL C ... / Še neobjavljeno v UL.
Not yet published in OJ.
(9a) Določiti je treba, da so predstavniki zaposlenih pri opravljanju svojih nalog enako zaščiteni, kot so zaščiteni predstavniki zaposlenih z zakonodajo in/ali prakso države zaposlitve.
(9a) Provision should be made for the employees' representatives to enjoy, when exercising their functions, the same protection and guarantees as are provided to employees' representatives by the legislation and/or practice of the country of employment.
Predstavniki ne smejo biti izpostavljeni diskriminaciji zaradi zakonitega opravljanja svojih dejavnosti in morajo biti ustrezno zaščiteni v zvezi z razrešitvijo in z drugimi sankcijami, v skladu z nacionalno prakso.
They should not be subject to any discrimination as a result of the lawful exercise of their activities and should enjoy adequate protection as regards dismissal and other sanctions, in accordance with national practice.
(10a) Določbe te direktive ne smejo vplivati na druge obstoječe pravice o udeležbi in ne vplivajo na druge obstoječe predstavniške strukture, ki jih predvidevajo Skupnost ter nacionalna zakonodaja in praksa.
(10a) The provisions of this Directive should not affect other existing rights regarding involvement and should not affect other existing representation structures, provided for by Community and national laws and practices.
Temeljno načelo in jasen cilj te direktive je, da se zavaruje pridobljene pravice zaposlenih v zvezi z udeležbo pri odločitvah družbe.
It is a fundamental principle and stated aim of this Directive to secure employees' acquired rights as regards involvement in company decisions.
(11) Če vsaj ena družba, ki sodeluje pri čezmejni združitvi, deluje v skladu s sistemom sodelovanja in če nacionalna zakonodaja države članice, v kateri je registrirani sedež družbe, nastale z združitvijo, ne nalaga tej družbi obveznega sodelovanja delavcev, je treba urediti sodelovanje delavcev v družbi , nastali s čezmejno združitvijo, in njihovo udeležbo pri opredelitvi takšnih pravic.
(11) If at least one of the companies taking part in the cross ‑border merger is operating under a participation system and if the national law of the Member State in which the registered office of the company created by the merger is situated does not impose compulsory employee participation on that company, the participation of employees in the company created by the cross‑border merger and their involvement in the definition of such rights must be regulated .
Zato je treba graditi na načelih in postopkih, predvidenih v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2157/2001 z dne 8. oktobra 2001 o statutu evropske družbe in v Direktivi Sveta 2001/86/ES z dne 8. oktobra 2001 o dopolnitvi Statuta evropske družbe,
To that end, the principles and procedures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European company 2 and in Council Directive 2001/86/EC of 8 October 2001 supplementing the Statute for a European company 3 should be taken as a basis.
(11) Če nacionalna zakonodaja države članice, v kateri je družba, nastala s čezmejno združitvijo, ne predvideva enake ravni sodelovanja, kot je uveljavljena v zadevnih družbah, ki se združujejo, (vključno z odbori nadzornega sveta s pooblastili za odločanje), je treba urediti sodelovanje zaposlenih v družbi, nastali s čezmejno združitvijo.
(11) If the national law of the Member State in which the company resulting from the cross-border merger is situated does not provide for the same level of participation as operated in the relevant merging companies (including in committees of the supervisory board that have decision-making powers) the participation of employees in the company resulting from the cross-border merger must be regulated.
Zato je treba graditi na načelih in postopkih, predvidenih v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2157/2001 z dne 8. oktobra 2001 o statutu evropske družbe in v Direktivi Sveta 2001/86/ES z dne 8. oktobra 2001 o dopolnitvi Statuta evropske družbe, ki pa se lahko spremenijo, če je to potrebno, ker bo za nastalo družbo veljala nacionalna zakonodaja države članice, v kateri ima družba registriran sedež.
To that end, the principles and procedures of Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European company 2 and Council Directive 2001/86 EC of 8 October 2001 supplementing the Statute for a European company 3 are taken as a basis , subject, however, to modifications that are deemed necessary because the resulting company will be subject to the national laws of the Member State where it has its registered office.
Da ne bi po nepotrebnem zavlačevali združitev, lahko države članice v skladu s členom 3 (2) (b) Direktive 2001/86/ES zagotovijo hiter začetek pogajanj v skladu s členom 14.
A prompt start to negotiations under Article 14 with a view to not unnecessarily delaying mergers, may be ensured by Member States in accordance with Article 3(2)(b) of Directive 2001/86/EC.
(11a)Pri ugotavljanju obsega soodločanja v podjetjih, udeleženih pri združitvi, je treba upoštevati tudi delež zaposlenih, ki zastopajo delavce v vodilnem organu, pristojnem za profitne enote.
(11a) For the purpose of determining the level of participation operated in the relevant merging companies, account should also be taken of the proportion of employees in the management group which covers the profit units of the companies subject to employee participation.
Člen 3, odstavek 1, točka (c a) (novo)
Article 3, paragraph 1, point (c a) (new)
(ca) vplive združitve na zaposlovanje,
(ca) the effects of the merger on employment,
Člen 3, odstavek 1, točka (g a) (novo)
Article 3, paragraph 1, point (g a) (new)
Vodstveni ali upravni organ vseh družb, ki se združujejo, pripravi poročilo za družbenike, v katerem pojasni in utemelji pravne in gospodarske vidike čezmejne združitve ter opredeli posledice čezmejne združitve za družbenike, upnike in delavce.
The management or admini s trative organ of each of the merging companies shall draw up a report intended for the members e x plaining and justifying the legal and ec o nomic aspects of the cross-border merger and explaining the implications of the cross-border merger for members, creditors and employees.
Poročilo je na voljo družbenikom, delojemalcem in njihovim zastopnikom najpozneje en mesec pred skupščino iz člena 6.
The report shall be made available to the members, the employees and their represe n tatives not less than one month before the date of the general meeting referred to in Article 6.
Temeljna pravica zaposlenih in njihovih predstavnikov je, da so obveščeni o (navadno zelo zapletenih, negotovih in daljnosežnih) posledicah čezmejnih združitev.
It is a fundamental right of employees and their representative to be informed about the (mostly highly complex, uncertain and far-reaching) consequences of a cross-border merger.
Po upoštevanju strokovnega poročila iz člena 5 skupščine vseh družb, ki se združujejo, potrdijo skupen predlog združitve.
After taking note of the expert report referred to in Article 5, the general meeting of each of the merging companies shall approve the common draft terms of cross‑border merger.
Po upoštevanju strokovnega poročila iz člena 5 in mnenja, ki ga izrazijo predstavniki zaposlenih v podjetjih, ki se združujejo, skupščine vseh družb, ki se združujejo, potrdijo skupen predlog združitve.
After taking note of the expert report referred to in Article 5 and the opinion expressed in the report of the employees, or the representatives of the employees, of the undertakings to be merged , the general meeting of each of the merging companies shall approve the common draft terms of the cross-border merger.