natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C. ker člen 43 Listine zagotavlja, da se ‘vsak državljan Unije ali vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba, ki prebiva ali ima registriran sedež v eni izmed držav članic Unije, lahko obrne na varuha človekovih pravic v zvezi z nepravilnostmi v dejanjih institucij in organov Skupnosti, z izjemo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Sodišča prve stopnje, ko delujeta v svoji pravosodni funkciji,
C. whereas Article 43 of the Charter provides that ‘any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role’,
F. ker se je v letu 2004 število pritožb naslovljenih na varuha človekovih pravic v primerjavi s prejšnjim letom znatno povečalo (za 53%) in ker je le polovica tega povečanja (51%) posledica dejstva, da so državljani desetih novih držav članic postali evropski državljani,
F. whereas in 2004 there was a substantial increase (53%) in the number of complaints addressed to the Ombudsman compared to the previous year and whereas only half of this increase (51%) is due to the fact that the nationals of the ten new Member States have now become European citizens,
G. ker je varuh človekovih pravic nepristranski organ, ki hkrati nudi državljanom izven sodno pomoč v Uniji, in ker je v letu 2004 nudil učinkovito pomoč v 70% vseh predloženih primerov, vključno z nedopustnimi pritožbami,
G. whereas the European Ombudsman is an impartial body and at the same time offers citizens an extrajudicial remedy within the Union, and whereas in 2004 he provided effective assistance in almost 70% of all cases referred to him, including inadmissible complaints,
H. ker je varuh človekovih pravic v letu 2004 zaključil 251 preiskav, od tega 247 poizvedb na podlagi pritožb in 4 na lastno pobudo, in ker je bilo 65 primerov po pritožbi varuhu človekovih pravic rešenih s strani institucij ali organov samih in predlaganih 12 sporazumnih rešitev,
H. whereas the Ombudsman closed 251 enquiries in 2004, of which 247 were enquiries into complaints and four were own-initiative enquiries; whereas 65 cases were settled by the institution or body itself following a complaint to the Ombudsman and 12 friendly solutions were proposed,
I. ker je varuh človekovih pravic podal Evropskemu parlamentu posebno poročilo (0I/2/2003/GG) v odgovor na pritožbo v zvezi s primerom, v katerem je bil po mnenju varuha človekovih pravic pritožnik, v službi Komisije, deležen diskriminacijskih zaposlitvenih pogojev in glede katerega ni bilo dosežene sporazumne rešitve in ker Komisija ni sprejela njegovega osnutka priporočila,
I. whereas the Ombudsman decided to submit a special report (0I/2/2003/GG) to the European Parliament in response to one complaint, which concerned a case in which the Ombudsman considered that the complainant had been subject to discriminatory employment conditions in the service of the Commission, and in which no amicable solution had been achieved and the Commission had not accepted his draft recommendation
J. ker je predložitev posebnega poročila Evropskemu parlamentu osnovno sredstvo, s katerim lahko varuh človekovih pravic išče podporo Evropskega parlamenta in njegovega Odbora za peticije, da bi zadostil državljanom, ki so jim bile kršene pravice, poročilo pa poleg tega spodbuja izboljšanje standardov evropske uprave,
J. whereas submitting a special report to the European Parliament represents an essential means by which the Ombudsman can seek the support of the European Parliament and its Committee on Petitions in order to bring satisfaction to citizens whose rights have been infringed, as well as promoting the improvement of the standards of European administration
K. ker preiskave varuha človekovih pravic pogosto pripeljejo do pozitivnega izida za pritožnike in ker lahko pomagajo izboljšati kakovost upravnih storitev,
K. whereas the Ombudsman’s enquiries often produce positive results for complainants and can help to improve the quality of administrative services,
L. ker lahko številne kritične pripombe varuha človekovih pravic, podane v poročilu za leto 2004 glede primerov slabega upravljanja, s sprejetjem in izvajanjem primernih ukrepov s strani institucij EU in drugih organov pomagajo preprečevati, da bi se napake in slabo delovanje ponavljali v prihodnosti,
L. whereas the numerous critical remarks made by the Ombudsman in his 2004 report regarding cases of maladministration may help to prevent errors or dysfunctions recurring in future through the adoption and implementation of suitable measures by EU institutions and other bodies,
M. ker je bila na Evropski parlament naslovljena kritična pripomba zaradi neuspešnega uveljavljanja pravil o kajenju v prostorih le-tega,
M. whereas a critical remark was addressed to the European Parliament because of its failure to take adequate measures to enforce its rules on smoking on its premises,
N. ker varuh človekov pravic s pripravljanjem srečanj in skupnih dogodkov še naprej gradi konstruktivne delovne odnose z institucijami in drugimi organi Evropske unije, z namenom doseganja večje skladnosti pri prizadevanju za skupne cilje,
N. whereas the Ombudsman continues to build constructive working relations with European Union institutions and bodies through meetings and joint events with a view to developing synergies in pursuit of common objectives,
O. ker letno poročilo prikazuje prizadevanja varuha človekovih pravic za širitev in krepitev mreže nacionalnih in regionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic Unije, držav prosilk, Norveške in Islandije preko izmenjave informacij in dobrih praks ob ustreznem upoštevanju dejstva, da so pooblastila, področja delovanja in odgovornosti varuhov človekovih pravic pogosto zelo različna,
O. whereas the annual report illustrates the work done by the Ombudsman to extend and energise the network of national and regional ombudsmen in the Union, the applicant countries, Norway and Iceland, by developing information exchanges and the sharing of best practice, with due regard for the fact that the powers exercised by ombudsmen and their spheres of action and responsibility are often very different,
P. ker bi sodelovanje Odbora za peticije Evropskega parlamenta v tej mreži olajšalo praktično sodelovanje med evropskimi institucijami in nacionalnimi ter regionalnimi varuhi človekovih pravic, glede na različnost odgovornosti, ki jim pripadajo,
P. whereas participation by the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions in this network could facilitate practical cooperation between European institutions and national and regional ombudsmen, given the various responsibilities they enjoy,
Q. ker je v letu 2004 varuh človekovih pravic razširil svoje komunikacijske dejavnosti zlasti informativne obiske, javne prireditve, konference in število intervjujev, da bi povečal osveščenost državljanov o upravi Skupnosti,
Q. whereas in 2004 the Ombudsman extended his communication activities, in particular information visits, public events, conferences and interviews given to the press, in order to raise citizens’ awareness of their rights vis-à-vis the Community’s administration,
R. ker je Evropski parlament 6. septembra 2001 soglasno sprejel Kodeks primernega obnašanja za javne uslužbence, kakor je svetoval varuh človekovih pravic v posebnem poročilu aprila 2000, ki pa ga Komisija še ni sprejela,
R. whereas on 6 September 2001 the European Parliament unanimously adopted the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, as recommended in the Ombudsman’s special report of April 2000, but which the Commission has not yet adopted,
2. čestita Uradu varuha človekovih pravic za večjo pestrost in posodobitev letnih publikacij, z namenom zadostiti raznim potrebam pritožnikov, poslancev, strokovnjakov in širše javnosti;
Congratulates the Ombudsman’s Office on diversifying and modernising its annual publications to cater for the various needs of complainants, Members of Parliament, professionals and the general public;
4. poziva varuha človekovih pravic, da naj se še naprej trudi ter na učinkovit in prilagodljiv način razvija svoje dejavnosti, da bodo državljani gledali nanj kot na varuha dobrega upravljanja evropskih institucij;
Urges the European Ombudsman to continue his efforts and to develop his activities in an efficient and flexible manner, so that he will be seen by citizens as the guardian of good administration of the European institutions;
Varuh človekovih pravic je v letnem poročilu za leto 1997 predlagal naslednjo definicijo: Nepravilnost se pojavi, ko javni organ ne deluje v skladu s pravilom ali načelom, ki je zanj zavezujoče. z vidika institucij in organov, na katere se nanaša, tako da sestavi natančen in izčrpen seznam, in z vidika zadev, ki so lahko predmet pritožbe, tako da odločno izključi tiste, za katere so odgovorne oblasti držav članic;
The Ombudsman proposed the following definition in his 1997 annual report: maladministration occurs when a public body fails to act in accordance with a rule or principle which is binding upon it. , with reference both to the institutions and bodies to which it applies, by drawing up a strict and exhaustive list, and to matters which may be the subject of complaints, by categorically excluding those which fall under the responsibility of the Member States’ authorities;
9. poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj preda zadeve Odboru za peticije, tako da se na sejah odbora lahko razpravlja o morebitni zavrnitvi prijateljske rešitve ali osnutka priporočila pristojne institucije ali organa in, če je primerno, upošteva mnenja pritožnika;
Urges the Ombudsman to refer matters to the Committee on Petitions so that the committee can debate at one of its meetings any rejection of an amicable solution or draft recommendation by the institution or body concerned, hearing the views of the complainant if appropriate;
13. podpira prizadevanja varuha človekovih pravic, da bi zagotovil odobritev krajšega roka obravnave pritožb s strani evropskih institucij v zvezi z zavrnitvijo dostopa do dokumentov in poziva Svet, naj sprejme ta predlog;
Approves the Ombudsman's efforts to secure acceptance on the part of the European institutions of a shorter deadline for dealing with complaints concerning refusal to grant access to documents and urges the Council to accept this proposal;
43. ; še posebej poziva Komisijo, naj ne zavrača vpogleda v dokumente z izgovorom, da so namenjeni interni uporabi;
43. ; in particular, urges the Commission not to refuse to make its documents available on the pretext that they are intended for internal use;
17. poziva strani, ki so vpletene v preiskave varuha človekovih pravic, naj se v korespondenci sklicujejo na ustrezen člen Evropskega kodeksa in poziva vse institucije in organe Skupnosti, naj pregledajo Kodeks in poročajo varuhu človekovih pravic o njegovem izvajanju v skladu s členom 27 tega Kodeksa;
Invites parties to the Ombudsman's inquiries to include in their correspondence a reference to the relevant article of the European Code and calls on all Community institutions and bodies to contribute to a review of the Code and to report to the Ombudsman concerning their implementation of the Code, in accordance with Article 27 thereof;
20. spodbuja širitev in krepitev sistema izvensodnih prizivov, kar je za državljane alternativa pravnim postopkom v obliki odločitev in priporočil, ki pravno niso zavezujoči in ne predstavljajo prisilnih ukrepov;
Encourages the extension and strengthening of the system of non-judicial appeal which provides citizens with an alternative to legal action, in the form of decisions and recommendations which are not legally binding and do not constitute coercive measures;
23. meni, da bo vključitev Odbora za peticije Evropskega parlamenta v mrežo omogočila močnejše in obsežnejše redne stike z odbori za peticije pri nacionalnih parlamentih in z varuhi človekovih pravic držav članic;
Considers that the inclusion of the European Parliament's Committee on Petitions in the network will enable it to increase and strengthen its regular contacts with the committees on petitions of the national parliaments and the ombudsmen of Member States;
26. pohvali dobre delovne odnose med Uradom varuha človekovih pravic in Odborom za peticije, vključno s procesom medsebojnega prenosa primerov;
Commends the good working relationship developed between the Ombudsman's Office and the Committee on Petitions, including a process for the mutual transfer of cases;
Letno poročilo o delu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2004
The annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman for the year 2004
člena 112(1) in 195(2)
Rules 112(1) and 195(2)
o predlogu okvirnega sklepa Sveta o boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu
on the proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the fight against organised crime
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................19
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................211
MNENJE ODBORA ZA ZUNANJE ZADEVE ........................................................................21
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ...............................................244
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE ..........................................................................26
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................31
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0006 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0006 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0061/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0061/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve in Odbora za pravne zadeve in notranji trg ( A6‑0277/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market ( A6‑0277/2005 ),
(3) Točka 3.3.2 Haaškega programa navaja, da zadeva približevanje materialnega kazenskega prava področja določenih hudih kaznivih dejanj s čezmejnimi razsežnostmi in da je treba področja kriminala, ki so posebej omenjena v pogodbah, obravnavati prednostno.
(3) Point 3.3.2 of the The Hague Programme states that the approximation of substantive criminal law serves the same purposes and concerns areas of particular serious crime with cross border dimensions and that priority should be given to areas of crime that are specifically mentioned in the treaties.
Opredelitev kaznivih dejanj, povezanih z udeležbo v hudodelski združbi, je torej treba približati v vseh državah članicah.
The definition of offences relating to participation in a criminal organisation should therefore be approximated in all the Member States.
Nadalje je treba glede na resnost teh kaznivih dejanj predvideti kazni in sankcije za fizične in pravne osebe, ki so jih storile ali so zanje odgovorne.
Moreover, penalties corresponding to the seriousness of these offences should be envisaged against natural and legal persons who committed them or are responsible for their commission.
Vendar pa lahko države članice za hudodelske združbe prosto določijo tudi druga združenja oseb, recimo takšna, ki niso usmerjena v pridobitev finančnih ali drugih premoženjskih koristi, ali pa takšna, ki storijo kazniva dejanja, ki se kaznujejo z odvzemom prostosti z maksimalnim trajanjem manj kot štiri leta.
The Member States are also free, however, to classify other groups of persons as criminal organisations, e.g. groups whose purpose is not that of financial or other material gain or which commit offences punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order of a maximum of less than four years.
(4) Predvideti je treba posebno kaznivo dejanje „vodenja hudodelske združbe“ in vključiti določbe, s katerimi bi olajšali sodelovanje med sodnimi organi in usklajevanje njihovega delovanja prek Eurojusta.
(4) Provision should be made for a specific offence of ‘directing a criminal organisation’, with provisions to facilitate cooperation between the judicial authorities and coordination of their action via Eurojust.
(4) Predvideti je treba posebno kaznivo dejanje " podpiranja, ustanavljanja, organiziranja ali vodenja hudodelske združbe" in vključiti določbe, s katerimi bi olajšali sodelovanje med sodnimi organi in usklajevanje njihovega delovanja prek Eurojusta.
(4) Provision should be made for a specific offence of ‘ promoting, setting up, organising or directing a criminal organisation’, with provisions to facilitate cooperation between the judicial authorities and coordination of their action via Eurojust.
(4a) V luči sprejetja instrumenta za varstvo podatkov za tretji steber je treba razviti sodelovanje med Interpolom in Europolom v zvezi z izmenjavo informacij za namen preiskovanja mednarodnega organiziranega kriminala.
(4a) Subject to the adoption of a third-pillar data protection instrument, cooperation between Interpol and Europol should be developed with a view to information being shared for the purpose of investigating transnational organised crime.
Razmerje med Europolom in Interpolom ni jasno opredeljeno, zato med njima prihaja do prekrivanj.
The relationship between EuroPol and InterPol is not clearly defined and there is overlap.
Vsaka organizacija ima svoje prednosti, ki jih treba učinkovito uporabiti v boju proti mednarodnemu kriminalu, zlasti v zvezi z izmenjavo informacij in v luči sprejetja instrumenta za varstvo podatkov za tretji steber, ki ga zahteva Evropski parlament, predlog zanj pa je Komisija obljubila še pred koncem leta.
Each has assets that should be shared to effectively combat transnational organised crimes, in particular with a view to information sharing and subject to the third pillar data protection instrument that the European Parliament has been asking for and which the Commission has promised to propose before the end of the year.
(4b) Ob upoštevanju sprejetja Okvirnega sklepa o evropskem dokaznem nalogu za pridobitev predmetov, dokumentov in podatkov za uporabo v postopkih v kazenskih zadevah bi morale države članice omogočiti vzajemno priznavanje dokaznih sredstev, pridobljenih proti storilcem kaznivih dejanj na področju mednarodnega organiziranega kriminala.
(4b) Subject to the adoption of the Framework Decision on the European Evidence Warrant for obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters, Member States should facilitate the mutual recognition of evidence obtained against the perpetrators of transnational organised crime.
(6a) Ta okvirni sklep naj bi zagotovil osnovo za prepričevanje tretjih držav, da bi uvedle podobne predpise.
(6a) This Framework Decision is expected to provide a basis for persuading third countries to introduce similar regulations.
Države članice bi morale biti za zgled in jasno dokazati svojo odločenost.
The Member States should set an example by giving strong proof of their determination.
(8) Ta okvirni sklep upošteva temeljne pravice, ki jih zagotavlja Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin in ki izhajajo iz skupnega ustavnega izročila držav članic kot načela prava Skupnosti .
(8) This Framework Decision respects fundamental rights as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they emerge from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States as principles of Community law.
Unija upošteva načela, ki jih priznava člen 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski Uniji in se odražajo v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, posebno v poglavju VI.
The Union observes the principles recognised by Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union and reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Chapter VI thereof.
Ničesar v tem okvirnem sklepu Sveta ni mogoče razlagati kot namero krnitve ali omejevanja temeljnih pravic ali svoboščin, kot so pravica do stavke, svoboda zbiranja, združevanja in izražanja, vključno s pravico, da lahko vsakdo skupaj z drugimi ustanovi sindikat ali se mu pridruži, da bi zaščitil svoje interese, ter z njimi povezano pravico do demonstracij.
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict fundamental rights or freedoms such as the right to strike, freedom of assembly, of association or of expression, including the right of everyone to form and to join trade unions with others for the protection of his or her interests and the related right to demonstrate.
Za namen tega okvirnega sklepa „hudodelska združba“ pomeni strukturirano združenje več kot dveh oseb, ki obstaja določeno obdobje ter deluje usklajeno in z namenom storitve kaznivih dejanj, ki se kaznujejo z odvzemom prostosti ali varnostnim ukrepom z odvzemom prostosti z maksimalnim trajanjem vsaj štiri leta ali s še strožjo kaznijo, da bi neposredno ali posredno pridobila finančne ali druge premoženjske koristi.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, ‘criminal organisation’ means a structured association , established over a period of time, of more than two persons, acting in concert with a view to committing offences which are punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order of a maximum of at least four years or a more serious penalty in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit.
Za namen tega okvirnega sklepa „hudodelska združba“ pomeni strukturirano združenje več kot dveh oseb, ki deluje usklajeno in z namenom storitve kaznivih dejanj, ki se kaznujejo z odvzemom prostosti ali varnostnim ukrepom z odvzemom prostosti z maksimalnim trajanjem vsaj štiri leta ali s še strožjo kaznijo, da bi neposredno ali posredno pridobila finančne ali druge premoženjske koristi.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, ‘criminal organisation’ means a structured association of more than two persons, acting in concert with a view to committing offences which are punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order of a maximum of at least four years or a more serious penalty in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit.
Člen 1, drugi odstavek
Article 1, paragraph 2
„Strukturirano združenje“ pomeni združenje, ki ni sestavljeno zgolj naključno za takojšnjo izvršitev kaznivega dejanja in ki nima nujno uradno določenih vlog svojih članov, kontinuitete članstva ali razvite strukture.
‘Structured association’ means an association that is not randomly formed for the immediate commission of an offence and that does not need to have formally defined roles for its members, continuity of its membership or a developed structure.
„Strukturirano združenje“ pomeni združenje, ki ni sestavljeno zgolj naključno za takojšnjo izvršitev enega ali več kaznivih dejanj, ki so med seboj povezana in ki nima nujno uradno določenih vlog svojih članov, kontinuitete članstva ali hierarhične strukture.
‘Structured association’ means an association that is not randomly formed for the immediate commission of one or more offences acting in concert and that does not need to have formally defined roles for its members, continuity of its membership or a hierarchical structure.
Člen 1a (novo)
Article 1 a (new)
Preprečevanje in nadzor kriminala
Prevention and crime control
Vsaka država članica sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe v skladu s svojo pravno tradicijo in razpoložljivimi sredstvi, da bi izboljšala preprečevanje kriminala.
Member States shall ensure that Europol’s role a criminal intelligence body is strengthened to allow it to fulfil its task of providing Member States with information and intelligence leading to more effective results in preventing and combating organised crime.
(a) dejanje vodenja hudodelske združbe;
(a) the fact of directing a criminal organisation;
(a) dejanje podpiranja, ustanavljanja, organiziranja ali vodenja hudodelske združbe;
(a) the fact of promoting, setting up, organising or directing a criminal organisation;