natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prizadevanja za močno mednarodno družbo, za brezhibno delujoče mednarodne institucije in za mednarodni red, temelječ na pravilih, vse to, k čemur stremi ta strategija, je jasen cilj, ki se popolnoma sklada s to višjo ravnjo politične organizacije.
The quest for a strong international society, well-functioning international institutions and a rule-based international order sought in this strategy is a clear objective which perfectly fits such a higher level of political organisation.
Na zelo pomembno vprašanje pa evropska varnostna strategija, najbrž zaradi njegove spornosti, ni odgovorila: kdaj je uporaba sile potrebna in legitimna?
However, one capital issue which has not been addressed by the European Security Strategy due probably to its controversial nature is when will resorting to force be necessary and legitimate.
Moramo se strinjati z evropsko varnostno strategijo, da mora biti osnovni okvir za mednarodne odnose Ustanovna listina Združenih narodov in da nosi Varnostni svet Združenih narodov glavno odgovornost za ohranjanje mednarodnega miru in varnosti.
We cannot but agree with the European Security Strategy that the fundamental framework for international relations must be the United Nations Charter and that the United Nations Security Council has the primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security.
Ostaja pa nejasno, v kakšnih okoliščinah bi se bilo pri ukrepih EU legitimno zateči k sili kot k zadnji rešitvi.
It remains unclear however under which circumstances it would be legitimate to make use of force as a last resort for EU actions.
Omeniti pa je vendarle treba tudi usklajene evropske ukrepe proti terorizmu.
However, some reference will be given to concerted European action against terrorism.
Zdaj je Evropa za teroriste tako tarča kot oporišče, evropske države pa so že bile napadene.
Europe is now a target as well as a base for terrorism and European countries have already been victims of attack.
Parlament se strinja z mnenjem, da se začneta pri boju proti terorizmu tradicionalna koncepta zunanje in notranje politike prekrivati, ter je pripravljen predlagati popolno vključitev boja proti terorizmu v zunanjo politiko EU.
The Parliament shares the view that the fight against terrorism blurs the traditional distinction between foreign and domestic policy and is ready to make proposals on the full integration of the fight against terrorism into the EU's external relations policy.
EU proizvede 25% svetovnega BDP, nudi več kot 50% svetovne uradne pomoči za razvoj in plačuje 40% proračuna ZN.
The EU produces 25% of Global GDP, provides more than 50% of world-wide ODA and 40 % of UN budget.
Je ena najpomembnejših svetovnih gospodarskih partnerjev, različne sporazume je podpisala z več kot 122 državami.
It is one of the most important global economic partners and has signed agreements of various types with more than 122 countries.
EU ima lahko odločilen glas pri boju proti terorizmu, če dosledno uporabi neizmerno moč in vpliv, ki izhajata iz njenih povezav na področju gospodarstva, trgovine in pomoči.
The Union is well placed therefore to have a decisive say in the fight against terrorism by making coherent use of the immense strength and influence derived from its economic, commercial and aid links.
To poročilo zato vključuje nekaj začetnih predlogov in priporočilo o ustanovitvi skupne delovne skupine odborov AFET in LIBE, ki naj bi stalno spremljala dejavnosti na tem področju.
This report includes therefore some initial proposals as well as the recommendation to set up a joint working group integrated from AFET and LIBE Committees to undertake ongoing work on this issue.
Mnenja Evropskega parlamenta o geografskih področjih za leto 2005
European Parliament views on the geographical areas for 2005
Pregled ukrepov SZVP med leti 1993 in 2003 po geografskih področjih kaže prednost, ki so jo resnično imela različna področja.
An overview of the distribution by geographical areas of CFSP actions from 1993 to 2003 shows the priority which in real terms has been given to the different areas.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bilo najpomembnejše področje zahodni Balkan in vzhodna Evropa z okoli 120 različnimi ukrepi SZVP, sledi podsaharska Afrika z okrog 60 ukrepi, Azija z okoli 25 ukrepi, Sredozemlje in Bližnji vzhod z manj kot 20 ukrepi ter Skupnost neodvisnih držav (SND) z okoli 15 ukrepi, medtem ko je bila regija z najmanj ukrepi Latinska Amerika in Karibi (z manj kot šestimi ukrepi).
It should be noted that the area which has been a first priority was the Western Balkans and Eastern Europe with some 120 different CFSP acts followed by sub-Saharan Africa with some 60 acts, Asia with some 25 acts, the Mediterranean and the Middle East with less than 20 acts as well as the Confederation of Independent States (CIS) with some 15 acts, the region with the least acts being Latin America and the Caribbean (with less than half a dozen acts).
Če si ta seznam ogledamo v luči različnih horizontalnih vprašanj, se na prvem mestu znajde okoli 40 ukrepov o orožju, razorožitvi in proti širjenju, sledi jim takrat rastoča EVOP z manj kot 20 ukrepi, daleč za tem pa preprečevanje konfliktov in boj proti terorizmu, ki štejeta manj kot šest ukrepov.
Should we examine the list in the light of the different horizontal issues, the question of armaments, disarmament and non-proliferation would come in first place with some 40 acts, followed by the then rising ESDP with less than 20 acts, but well before conflict prevention and the fight against terrorism which both account for less than half a dozen acts.
Jasno je, da se je od takrat in v zdajšnji perspektivi leta 2005 horizontalna analiza dramatično spremenila in da sta sedaj še posebej terorizem in EVOP tema večine ukrepov.
It is clear that since then and in the perspective of 2005, this horizontal analysis has dramatically changed with terrorism and ESDP in particular being now the object of the most acts.
Zato je izjemnega pomena, da se, kar se tiče geografskega vprašanja, popravi očitno nesorazmerje med različnimi geografskimi področji, tako da bo SZVP postala prava globalna politika EU in ne zgolj skupek določenih prednostnih območij.
It is of the utmost importance, therefore, as far as the geographical question is concerned, to correct the clear imbalance attached to the different geographical areas so that the CFSP becomes a real global policy for the Union and not just a simple amount of certain priorities areas.
Parlament je v premnogih resolucijah, posvečenih različnim področjem, priporočil način izvajanja politike EU na vsakem od omenjenih področij, in nobene potrebe ni po ponavljanju tako izčrpnega seznama.
Parliament has recommended in a large number of resolutions devoted to the different areas the way in which the policy of the Union towards each area should be carried out and there is no need to repeat such an exhaustive list.
Dovolj je tako vztrajati, kot vztraja to poročilo, da je potrebno bolj pošteno razmerje med regijami, tako da bo lahko EU sčasoma izkoristila prednosti svojih posebnih odnosov z nekaterimi področji za izražanje svojih mnenj pri ukvarjanju z drugimi razvijajočimi se področji in državami, kjer ni vzpostavljenih tovrstnih posebnih odnosov.
Suffice to insist therefore as the current report does on the necessity of a more fair balance among regions so that the Union can eventually take advantage of its special relations with some areas to supports its views when dealing with other emerging areas and countries where there is not such established special relationship.
Mnenja Evropskega parlamenta o financiranju SZVP za leto 2005
European Parliament views on the financing of CFSP for 2005
Evropski parlament je ponovno izrazil mnenje, da odgovornost Unije za izpolnitev obveznosti, ki jih ima na številnih pomembnih področjih, kot so zmanjšanje svetovne revščine, spodbujanje človekovih pravic in demokracije ter povezovanje s partnerskimi državami širom po svetu, zahteva razpoložljivost zadostnih finančnih sredstev.
The European Parliament has repeatedly expressed the view that the responsibility of the Union to honour its commitments on a number of crucial issues such as the global fight against poverty, the promotion of human rights and democracy and the links with partner countries around the world require that sufficient financial means are provided.
Poleg tega postaja vedno bolj jasno, da umetna delitev med vojaškimi in civilnimi izdatki ni več ustrezna, še posebej ob upoštevanju skupne civilne in vojaške doktrine, ki je podlaga tako preprečevanja konfliktov in kriznega upravljanja EU kot tudi najnovejšega razvoja na področju EVOP, zlasti če gre za samostojne operacije EU, načrtovane in izvedene izključno z evropskimi sredstvi.
In addition, it is becoming more and more evident that the artificial distinction between military and civil expenditure is no longer tenable, especially having in mind the joint civil and military philosophy which inspires the Union conflict prevention and crisis management policy as well as the latest developments in the field of the ESDP, in particular when it comes to EU autonomous operations planned and conducted exclusively by European means.
Prišel je čas, da se ta začarani krog prekine in v ta namen pričujoče poročilo vsebuje nekaj predlogov.
The time has come to end this vicious circle and the present report includes therefore some proposals in this regard.
Letno poročilo Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah SZVP, vključno s finančnimi posledicami za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti – 2003
Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities - 2003
Člen 112,1
Rule 112.1
Bastiaan Belder, Monika Beňová, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Simon Coveney, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Alfred Gomolka, Anna Ibrisagic, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Ioannis Kasoulides, Bogdan Klich, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Armin Laschet, Willy Meyer Pleite, Francisco José Millán Mon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Miroslaw Mariusz Piotrowski, Tobias Pflüger, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Roucek, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, György Schöpflin, Gitte Seeberg, Ursula Stenzel, István Szent-Iványi, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Paavo Väyrynen, Karl von Wogau, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Luis Yanez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
Bastiaan Belder, Monika Beňová, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Simon Coveney, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Alfred Gomolka, Anna Ibrisagic, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Ioannis Kasoulides, Bogdan Klich, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Armin Laschet, Willy Meyer Pleite, Francisco José Millán Mon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Tobias Pflüger, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, György Schöpflin, Gitte Seeberg, Ursula Stenzel, István Szent-Iványi, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Paavo Väyrynen, Karl von Wogau, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
o razrešnici za izvajanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za finančno leto 2003
on the discharge for implementing the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.........................................................3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION............................................3
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.................................................5
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...........................................5
o razrešnici za izvajanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za finančno leto 2003, oddelek I – Evropski parlament
on the discharge for implementing the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003, Section I - European Parliament
- ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za finančno leto 2003
- having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003
UL L 54, 28.2.2003. ,
OJ L 54, 28.2.2003. ,
- ob upoštevanju poročila o prihodkih in odhodkih ter bilance stanja glede na finančno leto 2003 ( C6-0015/2005 ),
- having regard to the revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet in respect of the financial year 2003 ( C6-0015/2005 ),
- ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča v zvezi s finančnim letom 2003 in odgovori institucij
- having regard to the annual report of the Court of Auditors concerning the financial year 2003, together with the institutions’ replies
UL C 293, 30.11.2004, str.
OJ C 293, 30.11.2004, p.
- ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti v zvezi z zanesljivostjo poročil ter zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo s tem povezanih transakcij, ki jo v skladu s členom 248 Pogodbe ES
- having regard to the Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty
UL C 294, 30.11.2004, str.
OJ C 294, 30.11.2004, p.
- ob upoštevanju člena 275 Pogodbe ES in člena 179a Pogodbe Euratom,
- having regard to Article 275 of the EC Treaty and Article 179a of the Euratom Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
1. , zlasti členov 145, 146 in 147 Uredbe ,
1. , particularly Articles 145, 146 and 147 thereof,
- ob upoštevanju člena 147(1) finančne uredbe z dne 25. junija 2002, v skladu s katerim se od vsake institucije Skupnosti zahteva, da stori ustrezne korake v skladu z ugotovitvami, ki spremljajo resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o razrešnici,
- having regard to Article 147(1) of the Financial Regulation of 25 June 2002, pursuant to which each Community institution is required to take all appropriate steps to act on the observations accompanying the European Parliament's discharge decision,
- ob upoštevanju finančne uredbe z dne 21. decembra 1977, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
- having regard to the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
5 UL L 356, 31.12.1977 5 ,
OJ L 356, 31.12.1977. ,
- ob upoštevanju člena 71 in člena 74(3) svojega Poslovnika in Priloge V k temu Poslovniku,
- having regard to Rules 71 and 74(3) of its Rules of Procedure and Annex V thereto,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6–0063/2005 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0063/2005 ),
A. ker Računsko sodišče v zvezi z Evropskim parlamentom v odstavku 9.15 svojega letnega poročila za finančno leto 2003 ugotavlja, „da so revidirane transakcije zelo zakonite in pravilne“,
A. whereas the Court of Auditors in paragraph 9.15 of its annual report for the financial year 2003 found as regards the European Parliament that "the transactions audited were substantially legal and regular",
B. ker se finančna uredba z dne 25. junija 2002 in Poslovnik Parlamenta, kakor je bil spremenjen 23. oktobra 2002, uporabljata od 1. januarja 2003 v zvezi s postopkovnimi pravili, ki urejajo postopek razrešnice,
B. whereas the Financial Regulation adopted on 25 June 2002 and the Rules of Procedure of Parliament as amended on 23 October 2002 apply with effect from 1 January 2003 as regards procedural rules governing the discharge procedure,
C. ker Poslovnik Parlamenta spremenjen 23. oktobra 2002, da določa, da se razrešnica podeli predsedniku in ne generalnemu sekretarju,
C. whereas Parliament's Rules of Procedure were amended on 23 October 2002 to provide that discharge is to be given to the President rather than to the Secretary-General,
o pripombah, ki so sestavni del odločitve o razrešnici za izvajanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za finančno leto 2003, oddelek I – Evropski parlament
containing the comments which are an integral part of the decision on the discharge for implementing the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003, Section I - European Parliament
- ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti v zvezi z zanesljivostjo poročil ter zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo s tem povezanih transakcij, ki jo v skladu s členom 248 Pogodbe ES
- having regard to the Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty
UL L 248, 16.09.2002, str.
OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p.
1 , zlasti členov 145, 146 in 147 Uredbe;
1. , particularly Articles 145, 146 and 147 thereof,
- ob upoštevanju člena 147(1) finančne uredbe z dne 25. junija 2002, v skladu s katerim se od vsake institucije Skupnosti zahteva, da stori ustrezne korake v skladu s ugotovitvami, ki spremljajo resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o razrešnici,
- having regard to Article 147(1) of the Financial Regulation of 25 June 2002, pursuant to which each Community institution is required to take all appropriate steps to act on the observations accompanying the European Parliament's discharge decision,
- ob upoštevanju člena 71 in člena 74(3) Poslovnika in Priloge V k temu Poslovniku,
- having regard to Rules 71 and 74(3) of its Rules of Procedure and Annex V thereto,
D. ker je treba resolucijo o razrešnici 2002, sprejeti 21 aprila 2004
D. whereas its resolution of 21 April 2004
UL L 330, 4.11.2004, p.
OJ L 330, 4.11.2004, p.
160. , spremljati in oceniti napredek pri izvajanju njenih priporočil,
160. on the discharge for 2002 should be followed up and progress in implementing its recommendations assessed,
Uporaba proračunskih sredstev
Use of appropriations
Proračunska sredstva za finančno leto 2003
Appropriations for the 2003 financial year
Proračunska sredstva, prenesena iz finančnega leta 2002
Appropriations carried over from the 2002 financial year
Proračunska sredstva 2003
Appropriations 2003
Proračunska sredstva iz namenskih prejemkov
Appropriations from assigned revenue
Člen 9.1 in 9.4 finančne uredbe
Article 9(1) & 9(4) of Financial Regulation
Stara finančna uredba (UL L 356, 31.12.1977).
Old Financial Regulation (OJ L 356, 31.12.1977).
Člen 9.2 in 9.5 finančne uredbe 1
Article 9(2) & 9(5) of Financial Regulation 1
Razpoložljiva proračunska sredstva
Appropriations available
Sprejete obveznosti
Commitments entered into
Izvedena plačila
Payments made
Proračunska sredstva, prenesena v 2004
Appropriations carried over to 2004
Člen 9
Article 9 of
finančne uredbe
Financial Regulation
Člen 10 finančne
Article 10 of Financial
Zapadla proračunska sredstva
Cancelled appropriations
Bilanca stanja 31. decembra 2003: 1.407.572.773
Balance sheet at 31 December 2003: 1,407,572,773
4. prepoznava, da je večji del programa pridobivanja lastnine Parlamenta že zaključen, vendar pa vabi proračunske organe, da zagotovijo optimalne proračunske napovedi in, še zlasti, da zneski, vneseni v osnutek proračuna, kar najbolje kažejo mogoče dejanske zahteve Parlamenta, ne pa sistematskega zatekanja k pomembnim prenosom iz nesorodnih proračunskih postavk;
Recognises that the greater part of Parliament's property acquisition programme has already been completed; nevertheless urges the budgetary authorities to ensure optimum budgetary forecasting and that the amounts entered in the draft budget reflect Parliament's real requirements rather than resorting systematically to significant transfers from unrelated budget lines;
7. ugotavlja, da so v letu 2003 prihodki Evropskega parlamenta 98.545.334 EUR (2002: 67.256.006 EUR);
Notes that in 2003 the European Parliament received revenue amounting to € 98,545,334 (2002: € 67,256,006);
Odgovor generalnega sekretarja na odstavek 9 resolucije o razrešnici z dne 21. aprila 2004. za vsakoletno sestavljanje dokumenta, ki bi bil jedrnat, dostopen in privlačen, za obveščanje javnosti o upravljanju proračuna Parlamenta;
Secretary-General's reply to paragraph 9 of Parliament's resolution of 21.4.2004. to draw up each year a document, which would be brief, accessible and attractive, to provide the public with more information on budgetary management in Parliament;
10. se zahvaljuje generalnemu sekretarju za pravočasno predložitev poročil, ki jih zahteva resolucija o razrešnici 2002 z dne 21. aprila 2004 , pred začetkom cikla naslednje razrešnice;
Expresses its thanks to the Secretary-General for supplying the reports requested in its resolution of 21 April 2004 on the discharge for 2002 in good time before the beginning of the following discharge cycle;
Izvajanje nove finančne uredbe
Implementation of the new Financial Regulation
15. ugotavlja, da se zdi, da izkušnje s strogo uporabo določil nove finančne uredbe v institucijah, kot je Parlament, ki upravljajo le z upravnim proračunom, v nekaterih primerih vodijo k pretirano zapletenim sistemom in finančnim krogom;
Notes that initial experience with a strict application of the terms of the new Financial Regulation to an institution such as the Parliament with only an administrative budget to manage is perceived to have led, in some cases, to overly complex systems and financial circuits;
1 Odstavki 9.7, 9.8, poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča 2003 1 , da medtem ko odredbodajalcem ni uspelo vzpostaviti v celoti delujočih nadzornih sistemov od datuma veljavnosti finančne uredbe (1. januarja 2003), je Parlamentu vseeno uspelo v letu 2003 začeti z izvajanjem novih najmanjših standardov za notranji nadzor, osrednje finančne službe in notranje revizijske funkcije;
Paragraphs 9.7 and 9.8, ECA report 2003. that while the authorising officers could not set up fully operational control systems from the date of entry into force of the Financial Regulation (1 January 2003), the Parliament was nevertheless able in the course of 2003 to begin to implement new 'Minimum Standards for Internal Control' (MSIC), a 'Central Financial Service' and an internal audit function;
2 Odgovor na odstavek 9.9, poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča 2003 2 , da bo potreba po naknadnem nadzoru, razvitem v celoti, ocenjena na podlagi bolj razvite samoocene tveganj in nadzora ustreznih odredbodajalcev;
Reply to paragraph 9.9, ECA report 2003. that the need for fully developed ex post verification will be evaluated on the basis of a more developed risk and control self-assessment by the respective authorising officers;
21. ugotavlja, da povzroča potreba po zagotavljanju kontinuitete operacij in zadostnem nadzoru funkcije predhodnega nadzora od prehoda k decentraliziranim finančnim pregledom znaten porast števila osebja za opravljanje nalog predhodnega nadzora;
Observes that since the transition to decentralised financial checks the need to ensure continuity of operations and adequate supervision of the ex ante control function has entailed a considerable increase in the number of staff assigned to ex ante control tasks;
Letna poročila o delu
Annual activity reports
26. z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je izjava generalnega sekretarja pospremljena s podrobnim akcijskim načrtom za odpravljanje pomanjkljivosti, navedenih v poročilih o delu;
Notes with satisfaction that the Secretary-General's declaration is accompanied by a detailed action plan intended to remedy the deficiencies identified in the activity reports;
29. ugotavlja pripombo Sodišča (odstavek 9.16, letno poročilo 2003), da bi morala poročila o delu vsebovati podrobnejše podatke o rezultatih izvedenega nadzora;
Notes the Court's remark, in paragraph 9.16 of its 2003 annual report, that the annual activity reports should give more detailed information on the results of the controls carried out;