natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Preučiti je treba, ali obstaja potreba po celoviti združitvi prava družb v en sam pravni akt ali pa je treba kot prvi korak konsolidirati le nekatera področja prava družb.
It should be examined, whether there is a need for a comprehensive consolidation of company law in one single legal act, or whether as a first step only some areas of company law should be consolidated.
Pri poenostavljanju zakonodajnega okolja mora Komisija navesti, katere direktive bi se razveljavile, katere kodificirale, katere pa spremenile.
When simplifying the regulatory environment, the Commission should specify which directives would be subject to repeal, to codification, and which ones would be modified.
Umika predlogov na področjih, kjer je Komisija že ugotovila zanimanje podjetij za zadevna področja, ni mogoče upravičiti z boljšo pravno ureditvijo.
The withdrawal of proposals in areas where the Commission already has identified an interest of the companies in the areas concerned can not be justified with better regulation.
Nadaljnji zakonodajni predlogi morajo temeljiti na širokem in skladnem pristopu, ki temelji na podrobnem pregledu obstoječe zakonodaje in poglobljeni presoji vplivov.
Further legislative proposals should be based on a broad and coherent approach based on a detailed review of the existing legislation and an in depth impact assessment.
Evropski parlament mora biti stalno vključen v celotni postopek razvijanja, določanja in sprejemanja poenostavitvenih ukrepov.
The European Parliament should continuously be involved throughout the process of developing, determining and adopting simplification measures.
Evropski okvir za upravljanje podjetij mora določiti ustrezne institucionalne pogoje za podjetja, da se spodbujajo dolgoročna donosnost in možnosti zaposlovanja, opredeliti mehanizme, ki preprečujejo slabo upravljanje, ter zagotoviti preglednost in odgovornost v zvezi z naložbami in njihovo donosnostjo.
A European framework for corporate governance should lay down proper institutional conditions for companies to promote long-term profitability and employment prospects, define mechanisms that prevent mismanagement and guarantee transparency and accountability with regard to investments and their returns.
Modelom delničarjev so nasproti postavljeni modeli zainteresiranih strani.
Shareholder models are contrasted with stakeholder models.
Da se podjetju dolgoročno omogoči povečanje dobička in optimalno delovanje v družbenem in gospodarskem smislu, je potreben medsebojni nadzor.
Checks and balances are needed to enable a company to maximise its profits in the long run and perform optimally in social and economic terms.
Ne smemo pozabiti, da delavci sestavljajo „človeški kapital“ družbe.
It should not be forgotten, that workers are constituting the 'human capital' of a company.
Razen tega delavci niso le podpisniki pogodbe o zaposlitvi, ampak hkrati tudi vlagatelji in državljani.
Furthermore, workers are not only parties to an employment contract, but at the same time are investors and citizens.
Delavce je treba razumeti kot udeležence v podjetju, tako kot se razumejo delničarji, v smislu, da sprejmejo tveganje, ki izhaja iz odločanja v podjetju.
Workers should be seen as participants in the company, just like shareholders, in the sense that they sustain risks arising from the company's choices.
Kodeks o upravljanju mora temeljiti na splošnem razumevanju s strani organizacij, ki predstavljajo vse zainteresirane strani zadevnih finančnih trgov in trgov dela.
Codes of governance should be based on a common understanding by the organisations representing all the stakeholders of the respective financial and labour markets.
Ta kodeks o upravljanju mora biti uveljavljen v pravu prek obveznih določb „upoštevaj ali pojasni“.
These codes of governance should be anchored in law through mandatory 'comply or explain' provisions.
Socialna odgovornost podjetij se ne sme več obravnavati le kot rezultat upravljanja, ampak mora biti sestavni del postopka upravljanja.
Corporate social responsibility should not be considered any longer a mere outcome of the governance but it should be an integral part of the process of governance.
Načela OECD morajo biti minimalni standard, ki ga je treba potrditi na ravni EU v evropski zakonodaji o pravu družb in upravljanju podjetij.
OECD principles should serve as a minimum standard which should be endorsed at EU level in the European legislation on company law and corporate governance.
Komisija mora upoštevati raznolikost nacionalnih pravnih sistemov in zlasti razlike med državami z enotirnimi in dvotirnimi sistemi odborov.
The Commission should take due account of the diversity of national legal systems, and in particular of the differences between countries with one-tier and two-tier board systems.
Komisija ne sme več odlašati s predložitvijo štirinajste direktive na področju prava družb o čezmejnem prenosu registriranega sedeža družb z omejeno odgovornostjo.
The Commission should not hesitate any longer to submit the 14th company law Directive on the cross-border transfer of the registered office of limited companies.
Vendar se prenos registriranih sedežev ne sme uporabljati za omejevanje pravic delavcev, zlasti udeležbe delavcev.
However, the transfer of registered offices must not be used to restrict workers’ rights, in particular employee participation.
Razpravo o „demokraciji delničarjev“ je treba uvrstiti v širši cilj, ki bi ga lahko opredelili kot vzpostavljanje zakonodajnega okolja, ki usklajuje finančne interese delničarjev z dolgoročnim interesom podjetja in njenih osrednjih sestavnih delov, npr. delavcev.
The discussion of “shareholder democracy” should be placed within a broader objective which could be defined as setting up a regulatory environment that aligns the financial interests of shareholders with the long-term interest of the company and its core constituencies, such as employees.
Parlament mora biti stalno vključen v razpravo o prihodnjih prednostnih nalogah pri pravu družb in upravljanju podjetij.
Parliament should continuously be involved in the debate on further priorities in company law and corporate governance.
o nedavnem razvoju dogodkov in obetih na področju prava družb
on Recent developments in and prospects for company law
Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. poudarja, da je za spodbujanje učinkovitega in dolgoročno trajnostnega upravljanja podjetij pomembno zagotoviti zvestobo delničarjev;
Stresses that, in order to promote corporate governance which is effective and sustainable in the long term, it is important to win the loyalty of the shareholders;
5. poziva Komisijo, da v večji meri vključi Parlament v razprave o mednarodnih in evropskih računovodskih standardih ter da spodbudi opredelitev evropskega pristopa, ki bo temeljil na najboljših praksah in tradicijah v državah članicah, namesto slepega sledenja tradicijam revizije v ZDA; ponovno poudarja, da v mednarodnih organizacijah za postavljanje standardov potrebujemo več predstavnikov z evropskim ozadjem, da bi tako utemeljili pravi mednarodni pristop; poudarja, da pravila o računovodskih standardih vplivajo na davčno zakonodajo in poslovne strukture;
Calls on the Commission to involve Parliament better in discussions on international and European accounting standards and to reinforce the definition of a European approach based on the best practices and traditions in the Member States instead of blindly following the traditions of US auditing; stresses again the need for more representatives with a European background in the international standard setting bodies in order to legitimate a true international approach; emphasises that regulations on accounting standards have an impact on tax law and business structures;
14. poudarja, da upravljanje podjetij ne obsega samo odnosov med delničarji in upravo, saj so za uravnoteženo sprejemanje odločitev pomembne tudi druge zainteresirane strani znotraj podjetja, ki bi jim moralo biti omogočeno sodelovanje pri sprejemanju odločitev o strategiji podjetja; še zlasti bi bilo potrebno uvesti obveščanje zaposlenih in posvetovanja z njimi;
Stresses that corporate governance is not only about the relationship between shareholders and management, but that other stakeholders within the company are also important for a balanced decision-making process and should be able to contribute to decisions on the strategy of companies; in particular, there should be room for information for and consultation of employees;
Nedavni razvoj dogodkov in obeti na področju prava družb
Recent developments in and prospects for company law
Obravnava v odboru
Date adopted
Datum sprejetja
Result of final vote
Poslanci, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitute(s) present for the final vote
Nedavni razvoj in nadaljnje možnosti v zvezi s pravom družb
Recent developments and prospects in relation to company law
Datum dovoljenja na zasedanju (člen 45)
Date authorisation announced in plenary (Rule 45)
Datum dovoljenja na zasedanju (člen 39)
Date authorisation announced in plenary (Rule 39)
o skupnem besedilu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi določb Aarhuške konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah v institucijah in organih Skupnosti, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3614/2006 – C6‑0156/2006 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3614/2006 – C6‑0156/2006 ),
Besedila, sprejeta 18.1.2006, P6_TA(2006)0016 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts Adopted, 18.1.2006, P6_TA(2006)0016 . on the Council common position
UL C 264, 25.10.2005, str.
OJ C 264, 25.10.2005 ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6–0230/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0230/2006 ),
25. junija 1998 je Evropska skupnost skupaj s 15 državami članicami podpisala Konvencijo Gospodarske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah, bolj znano pod imenom "Aarhuška konvencija".
On 25 June 1998 the European Community, together with the fifteen Member States, signed the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, better known as the "Aarhus Convention".
Skupnost je že sprejela sklop zakonodaje, ki se razvija in prispeva k doseganju ciljev Aarhuške konvencije, kot npr.
The signing of the Aarhus Convention obliges the Community to align its legislation to the Convention's requirements.
Direktiva 2003/4/ES o dostopu javnosti do informacij o okolju
The Community has already adopted a body of legislation, which is evolving and contributes to the achievement of the objectives of the Aarhus Convention, such as Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to information in environmental matters
Direktiva 2003/4/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2003 o dostopu javnosti do informacij o okolju, UL L 41, 14.2.2003, str.
Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information, OJ L 41, 14.2.2003, p.
26. in Direktiva 2003/35/ES o sodelovanju javnosti pri sestavi nekaterih načrtov in programov v zvezi z okoljem
26. and Directive 2003/35/EC providing for public participation in the drawing up of certain plans and programmes
Direktiva 2003/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. maja 2003 o sodelovanju javnosti pri sestavi nekaterih načrtov in programov v zvezi z okoljem, UL L 156, 25.6.2003, str.
Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment, OJ L 156, 25.6.2003, p.
Pomembna je tudi Uredba 2001/1049/ES o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Komisije, Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Also the Regulation 2001/1049/EC on public access to documents held by the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council is of relevance
Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, UL L 145, 31.5.2001, str.
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p.
Vendar Komisija meni, da te določbe niso dovolj za aplikacijo zahtev Aarhuške konvencije v institucijah in organih ES v celoti, saj je ta konvencija mestoma bolj podrobna, njen obseg pa širši od veljavne zakonodaje ES.
The Commission, however, took the view that these provisions are not sufficient in order to fully apply the requirements of the Aarhus Convention to the EC institutions and bodies, as the Convention is, in part, more detailed and its scope broader than existing EC law.
Komisija je zato 24. oktobra 2003 predložila predlog uredbe o uporabi določb treh stebrov Aarhuške konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah v institucijah in organih Evropske skupnosti.
The Commission therefore submitted on 24 October 2003 a proposal for a Regulation on the application of the Aarhus Convention’s three pillars on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters to the Community institutions and bodies.
Po prvi obravnavi Evropskega parlamenta 31. marca 2004 je Svet 18. julija 2005 sprejel skupno stališče v katerem je – vsaj delno – sprejel le 5 od 35 predlogov sprememb Parlamenta s prve obravnave.
Following Parliament's first reading on 31 March 2004, the Council adopted its common position on 18 July 2005 accepting -at least partially- only 5 out of the 35 Parliament first reading amendments.
Parlament je drugo obravnavo zaključil 18. januarja 2006 s sprejetjem 25 predlogov sprememb k skupnemu stališču Sveta.
Parliament concluded its second reading on 18 January 2006 adopting a total of 25 amendments to the Council common position.
Svet je v pismu z dne 25. aprila 2006 sporočil, da ne more sprejeti vseh predlogov sprememb Parlamenta in da je potreben spravni postopek.
The Council informed with letter from 25 April 2006 that it could not accept all of Parliament's amendments and that conciliation was necessary.
Spravni postopek se je uradno začel 2. maja.
Conciliation was then formally opened on 2 May.
Spravni postopek
The conciliation procedure
Ustanovna seja delegacije Parlamenta je potekala 15. februarja 2006 v Strasbourgu.
The Parliament Delegation held its constituent meeting on 15 February 2006 in Strasbourg.
Trem trialogom, ki so potekali od 7. marca do 26. aprila 2006 (7.3.2006, 21.3.2006 in 26.4.2006), so sledile seje delegacije EP (15.3.2006, 4.4.2006 in 2.5.2006), na katerih je prišlo do začasnega dogovora o 16 predlogih sprememb, za katere je bilo potrebno splošno soglasje.
Three trialogues were held between 7 March and 26 April 2006 (7.3.2006, 21.3.2006 and 26.4.2006), followed by subsequent meetings of the EP Delegation (15.3.2006, 4.4.2006 and 2.5.2006), which lead to provisional agreement on 16 amendments, subject to an overall agreement.
Spravni odbor se je nato popoldne 2. maja 2006 sestal v prostorih Sveta, da bi uradno začel postopek in morda tudi dosegel dogovor o odprtih vprašanjih.
The Conciliation Committee met then in the afternoon of 2 May 2006 in the Council with a view to formally opening the procedure and possibly also reaching agreement on the outstanding issues.
Glavne točke dogovora v spravnem postopku so povzete v nadaljevanju:
The main points of the agreement reached in conciliation can be summarised as follows:
Dostop do informacij
Access to information
Izkazalo se je, da je bilo najtežje doseči dogovor o predlogih sprememb glede dostopa do informacij, zlasti predlogih sprememb 4, 14 in 15.
The amendments regarding access to information, particularly amendments 4, 14 and 15 concerning exceptions, proved the most difficult to solve.
Pravna služba EP je v svojem mnenju navedla, da prvotna ubeseditev predlogov sprememb 4 in 14 krši načelo pravne varnosti in da jo je treba preoblikovati.
An opinion from the EP Legal Service indicated that amendments 4 and 14 as originally drafted infringed the principle of legal certainty and had to be reformulated.
Pravna služba EP je podala konkretne predloge za preoblikovanje, ki jih je delegacija EP v celoti upoštevala in ki so tudi kasneje predstavljali osnovo za doseženi dogovor s Svetom.
The EP Legal Service made concrete suggestions for reformulation, fully endorsed by the EP Delegation, which then also formed the basis for the agreement reached with the Council.
Doseženi dogovor temelji na režimu izjem iz obstoječe Uredbe 1049/2001/ES o dostopu do dokumentov institucij ES.
The agreement reached is based on the regime of exceptions laid down in existing Regulation 1049/2001/EC on access to documents held by the EC institutions.
Ta rešitev zagotavlja usklajen in funkcionalen pristop, saj uvaja zgolj en poenoten režim za dostop do vseh vrst informacij institucij in organov ES.
This solution ensures a coherent and functional approach as there will be one single regime for access to all kind of information held by the EC institutions and bodies.
Delegaciji EP je s poostritvijo ustreznih izjem in z zagotovitvijo njihove restriktivne interpretacije uspelo tudi okrepiti določbe glede dostopa do informacij, povezanih z emisijami v okolje.
The EP Delegation also succeeded in strengthening the provisions regarding access to information related to emissions into the environment, by making the relevant exceptions more restrictive as well as ensuring that the interpretation of exceptions will be made in a restrictive way.
Udeležba javnosti pri odločanju
Public participation in decision making
Za Parlament je bil glavni predmet obravnave razširitev udeležbe javnosti pri pripravi, spreminjanju ali reviziji načrtov in programov v zvezi z okoljem na Evropsko investicijsko banko in na načrte in programe, ki jih institucije in organi Skupnosti ne le "pripravijo" in "sprejmejo", ampak tudi "financirajo".
For Parliament, the main issue at stake was to extend participation of the public in the preparation, modification or review of environmental plans and programmes to the European Investment Bank as well as to plans and programmes not just "prepared" and "adopted", but also "funded" by the Community institutions and bodies.
Delegaciji EP je uspelo zagotoviti prvo razširitev, glede druge pa je sprejela stališče Sveta, po katerem je udeležba javnosti v načrtih in programih, ki jih "pripravijo" in "sprejmejo" institucije in organi Skupnosti, že zagotavlja zadostno in zadovoljivo raven udeležbe javnosti.
The EP Delegation secured the former and accepted the Council's position on the latter, noting that public participation to plans and programmes "prepared" and "adopted" by the Community institutions and bodies already provided for a sufficient and satisfactory level of public involvement.
Dogovorjeno je bilo tudi, da ustrezne institucije in organi Skupnosti pri odločanju o načrtu ali programu v zvezi z okoljem svojo odločitev sporočijo (ne pa zgolj "vlagajo razumne napore" v to) javnosti.
It was also agreed that when taking a decision on an environmental plan or programme the relevant Community institution and body shall inform (and not just "make reasonable efforts to inform") the public about this decision.
V uvodne izjave je bila v skladu z Arhuško konvencijo vključena tudi omemba udeležbe javnosti glede "politik".
A reference to public participation regarding "policies" along the lines of the Aarhus Convention has also been included in the recitals.
Dostop do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah
Access to justice in environmental matters
Delegaciji EP je uspelo obdobje, v katerem lahko nevladne organizacije zahtevajo notranjo revizijo upravnega akta, ki zadeva okolje, podaljšati s 4 tednov na 6.
The EP Delegation succeeded in extending from 4 to 6 weeks the period during which NGOs might request the internal review of an administrative act concerning the environment.
Dogovorjeno je bilo tudi, da institucije in organi Skupnosti začnejo uporabljati zahteve uredbe devet mesecev po začetku njene veljavnosti.
It was also agreed that Community institutions and bodies shall apply the requirements of the Regulation nine months after its entry into force.
Uredba začne veljati tri dni po objavi v Uradnem listu EU.
The Regulation enters into force three days after its publication in the EU Official Journal.
Delegacija EP je bila glede vključitve "trajnostnega razvoja" mnenja, da zadostuje omemba v uvodnih izjavah, saj gre za zelo širok pojem, ki vključuje veliko število dejavnosti, ki niso neposredno povezane z varstvom okolja (globalizacija, zaposlitev).
On the inclusion of "sustainable development" the EP Delegation took the view that a reference in the recitals was sufficient given that this is a very broad term covering a lot of activities not directly related to the protection of the environment (globalisation, employment).
Sicer pa je glavni cilj te uredbe zagotovitev dostopa do pravnega varstva okoljskim, in ne vsem nevladnim organizacijam.
The primary objective of this Regulation though is to assure access to justice for environmental and not for all kind of NGOs.
Delegaciji EP je v uvodnih izjavah uspelo zagotoviti tudi sklicevanje na "odgovorne" nevladne organizacije (namesto "ki spoštujejo zakone") kot dodatno merilo, ki jim omogoča, da zahtevajo notranjo revizijo pravnih aktov, ki jih sprejmejo institucije ali organi Skupnosti.
The EP Delegation also secured a reference in the recitals to "accountable" (instead of "law abiding") NGOs, as a further criterion for permitting them to request internal review of acts adopted by a Community institution or body.
Končno besedilo predstavlja zelo ugoden in uravnotežen kompromis.
The final text can be regarded as a very satisfactory and well balanced compromise.
Glede na to, da je bilo sprejetih veliko predlogov sprememb z druge obravnave Evropskega parlamenta, glede ostalih pa je bil dosežen ugoden kompromis, lahko izid spravnega postopka z vidika Evropskega parlamenta označimo kot za zelo uspešen.
Given that many of the European Parliament second reading amendments have been accepted and satisfactory compromises were reached on the others, the outcome of the conciliation procedure can be regarded as very successful for the European Parliament.
Delegacija Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru zato priporoča sprejetje skupnega besedila na tretji obravnavi.
The Parliament Delegation to the Conciliation Committee therefore recommends that the joint text be approved at third reading.
Skupno besedilo Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi določb Aarhuške konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah v institucijah in organih Skupnosti, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community Institutions and bodies
Člena 251(5) in 175(1) ES
Articles 251(5) and 175(1) EC
Vodja delegacije: podpredesednik
Delegation chair( wo )man: Vice-President