natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Parlament se prav tako strinja s preoblikovanjem prilog, kar bo prispevalo k večji jasnosti.
In the interests of clarity, Parliament also sought to reorganise the annexes.
Resolucija tako določa hierarhijo projektov: projekti skupnega interesa, ki predstavljajo osnovo vseevropskih projektov, so našteti v prilogi III, prednostni projekti, ki so opredeljeni kot projekti evropskega interesa, pa so našteti v prilogi I.
The resolution therefore established an order or priority for the projects with the projects of common interest representing the basis of the trans-European projects listed in Annex III and the priority projects described as projects of European interested listed in Annex I.
Svet ima v svojem skupnem stališču, ki ga je posredoval Parlamentu v prvi polovici januarja, drugačen pristop: črtanje evropskega koordinatorja, kakor tudi izjave evropskega interesa in obveznosti, ki iz tega izhajajo.
In the common position forwarded to Parliament in mid-January, the Council adopted a different approach, simply abolishing the European coordinator and the declaration of European interest and the obligations deriving there from.
Svet sprejema samo obrobne spremembe, ki jih resolucija Parlamenta prinaša k predlogu Evropske komisije.
The Council is accepting only the minor changes made to the Commission's proposal by Parliament's resolution.
Svet želi vseevropsko omrežje, vendar si ga očitno zamišlja preprosto kot dodatek k nacionalnim omrežjem in nacionalnim politikam.
The Council wants a trans-European network but clearly sees it only as a juxtaposition of national networks and national policies.
Glede na nedavno krizo med Ukrajino in Rusijo ter izjavami v Hampton Courtu je oblikovanje evropske energetske politike nujno.
In the light of the recent crisis involving Ukraine and Russia and the declarations made at Hampton Court, there is a clear need for a European energy policy.
Za evropske institucije je torej to besedilo priložnost, da pokažejo svojo odločenost glede tega.
This decision therefore represents an opportunity for the European Institutions to display their willingness to develop one.
Vaš poročevalec meni, da so nove določbe, ki vpeljujejo izjavo evropskega interesa in možnost imenovanja koordinatorja, nujno potrebne, da se ustvari pravi notranji trg plina in električne energije, ki bo zagotavljal varnost oskrbe.
Your rapporteur believes that the new provisions introducing the declaration of European interest and the possibility of appointing a coordinator are vital tools for ensuring a genuine market in gas and electricity and guaranteeing security of supply.
Takšno evropsko omrežje pa lahko uresničimo samo z izboljšanjem in povečanjem medsebojnih povezav.
This European network can only be achieved by improving and increasing interconnections.
Vaš poročevalec zato predlaga, da se ponovno vključijo predlogi sprememb iz prvega branja ali besedilo prvotnega predloga, ki bodo Uniji ponovno dali na razpolago sredstva za uresničitev ciljev, ki si jih je zastavila.
Your rapporteur therefore suggests that either the amendments tabled at first reading or the initial text of the Commission proposal should be reinstated so as to reintroduce these tools and provide the Union with the resources necessary to attain the goals it has set itself.
Datum 1. obravnave v Parlamentu- Številka postopka
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P number
o varnosti v cestnem prometu: zagotovitev sistema za klic v sili (eCall) državljanom
on Road safety: bringing eCall to citizens
o varnosti v cestnem prometu: zagotovitev sistema za klic v sili (eCall) državljanom
on road Safety: Bringing eCall to citizens
– ob upoštevanju Bele knjige Komisije "Evropska prometna politika za leto 2010: čas odločitve" ( KOM(2001)0370 ) in svoje resolucije z dne 12. februarja 2003
– having regard to the Commission White Paper 'European transport policy for 2010: time to decide' ( COM(2001)0370 ), and its resolution of 12 February 2003 thereon
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije "Informacijska in komunikacijska tehnologija za varna in inteligentna vozila" ( KOM(2003)0542 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication 'Information and Communications Technologies for Safe and Intelligent Vehicles' ( COM(2003)0542 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije "Evropski akcijski program za varnost v cestnem prometu - Prepolovitev števila žrtev prometnih nesreč v Evropski uniji do leta 2010: soodgovornost" ( KOM(2003)0311 ) in njene publikacije "Rešimo 20.000 življenj na cestah" iz oktobra 2004,
– having regard to the Commission Communication 'European Road Safety Action Programme - Halving the number of road accident victims in the European Union by 2010: A shared responsibility' ( COM(2003)0311 ) and its publication 'Saving 20 000 lives on our roads' of October 2004,
– ob upoštevanju Priporočila Komisije 2004/345/ES o krepitvi varnosti v cestnem prometu z dne 6. aprila 2004
– having regard to Commission Recommendation 2004/345/EC of 6 April 2004 on enforcement in the field of road safety
UL L 111, 17.4.2004, str.
OJ L 111, 17.4.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju veronske izjave o varnosti v cestnem prometu z dne 5. decembra 2003, zaključkov drugega veronskega srečanja ministrov za promet EU leta 2004 in za tem podanih obvez teh ministrov glede varnosti v cestnem prometu kot prednostne naloge,
– having regard to the Verona Declaration on Road Safety of 5 December 2003 as well as the conclusions of the Second Verona meeting of EU transport ministers of 2004 and the subsequent commitment given by those ministers to regard road safety as a priority,
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije "i2010 - Evropska informacijska družba za rast in zaposlovanje" ( KOM(2005)0229 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication 'i2010 – A European Information Society for growth and employment' ( COM(2005)0229 ),
– ob upoštevanju Drugega sporočila Komisije o varnosti vozil "Zagotovitev sistema za klic v sili (eCall) državljanom" ( KOM(2005)0431 ),
– having regard to the Commission's 2nd eSafety Communication 'Bringing eCall to citizens' ( COM(2005)0431 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6–0072/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0072/2006 ),
A. ker je leta 2004 v EU 25-ih držav članic v prometnih nesrečah umrlo 43.000 ljudi ter ker bi s storitvijo vseevropskega avtomobilskega klica v sili (eCall) rešili do 2.500 življenj letno in tako za 15 % zmanjšal resnost poškodb,
A. Whereas, in 2004, 43 000 people died in road accidents in the EU-25 Member States and a pan-European in-vehicle emergency call service/function, eCall, could save up to 2 500 lives a year and bring about a reduction of up to 15% in the gravity of injuries,
B. ker bi uvedba eCall sistema za klic v sili zmanjšala letne zunanje stroške cestnega prometa za okrog 26 milijard EUR in tako državljanom prihranila breme v višini 26 milijard EUR; ker bi si bilo treba namesto za internalizacijo prizadevati za zmanjšanje zunanjih stroškov,
B. Whereas the introduction of the eCall system would reduce the annual external costs of road traffic by up to EUR 26 billion, thus relieving citizens of a burden of up to EUR 26 billion; whereas efforts should be made to reduce, not internalise, external costs,
C. ker sistem eCall prinaša možnost skrajšanja časa ukrepanja ob nesrečah za približno 40 % v mestnih območjih in za približno 50 % na podeželskih območjih,
C. Whereas the eCall system has the potential to reduce the response time to accidents by approximately 40% in urban areas and approximately 50% in rural areas,
D. ker je potrebno pozdraviti storitev avtomobilskega klica v sili, imenovanega eCall, kot prvega koraka v okviru pobude "inteligentni avtomobil"
D. Whereas the eCall system is to be welcomed as the first building block of the intelligent car initiative
E. ker je obsežna uvedba sistema eCall do leta 2009 prednostni cilj pobude o varnosti vozil (eSafety).
E. Whereas the large-scale roll-out of eCall by 2009 is a priority of the eSafety initiative,
F. ker je bil dosežen velik napredek na področju tehnologije, sistemov in storitev za varnost vozil (eSafety) in ker razvoj programa Galileo prav tako ponuja možnosti za prihodnost,
F. Whereas considerable progress has been made in the field of eSafety technologies, systems and services, and the development of Galileo also offers potential for the future,
4. predlaga, da bi morala biti ob upoštevanju dogovorjenega časovnega načrta programa Galileo popolna uvedba sistema eCall časovno usklajena z začetkom polnega delovanja sistema za določanje položaja Galileo, tj. leta 2010;
Suggests that, having regard to the agreed schedule of the Galileo Programme, the full roll-out of eCall should be synchronised with the fully operational phase of the Galileo satellite positioning system, which starts in 2010;
6. zato poziva organe držav članic, naj v gradivo za svoje javne kampanje o varnosti v cestnem prometu vključijo informacije o sistemu eCall;
Urges the authorities of the Member States, therefore, to include information about eCall in the material for their public road safety campaigns;
13. se zaveda, da bo tehnologija, ki je potrebna za sistem eCall, omogočila zgodnji prevzem drugih inovativnih naprav aktivne varnosti z znižanjem mejnih stroškov njihove uvedbe;
Is aware that the technology needed for eCall will facilitate early adoption of other innovative active safety applications by lowering the marginal costs of their introduction;
15. upoštevajoč morebitno ceno sistema eCall, ki bo morda višja v regijah, ki jih pestijo stalno prisotne ovire, in zavedajoč se, da je veliko novih tehnologij dragih ter da kupci novih avtomobilov (predvsem nižjih cenovnih razredov) niso vedno pripravljeni ali zmožni plačati polno ceno; poziva vse interesne skupine, da delujejo skupaj za določitev spodbud, ki bodo pospešile uvedbo sistema eCall (kot je povezava s sistemi zavarovanj);
Having regard to the potential cost of the eCall system, which may be higher in regions affected by permanent constraints, and being aware of the fact that many new technologies may prove costly and that new car buyers (particularly at the cheaper end of the market) are not always willing or able to pay the full cost; calls on all stakeholders to work together to define incentives to speed up the introduction of the eCall system (such as a link with insurance systems);
Varnost v cestnem prometu: zagotovitev sistema za klic v sili (eCall) državljanom
Road safety: bringing eCall to citizens
o sektorskih vidikih akcijskega načrta državnih pomoči: pomoč za inovacije
on sectoral aspects of the State Aid Action Plan: aid for innovation
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................14
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY...............13
o državni pomoči za inovacije
on sectoral aspects of the State Aid Action Plan : aid for innovation
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z 2. septembra 2005 z naslovom "Dokument o posvetovanju o državni pomoči za inovacije" ( KOM(2005)0436 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 2 September 2005, entitled 'Consultation Document on State Aid for Innovation' ( COM(2005)0436 ),
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta državnih pomoči Sveta: Manjša in bolje usmerjena državna pomoč: časovni načrt za reformo državnih pomoči 2005-2009 s 7. junija 2005 ( KOM(2005)0107 ),
– having regard to the Commission's State aid action plan: Less and better-targeted State aid: a roadmap for State aid reform 2005-2009 of 7 June 2005 ( COM(2005)0107 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije s 14. februarja 2006 o reformiranju državne pomoči 2005–2009
– having regard to its resolution of 14 February 2006 on State aid reform 2005-2009
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0054 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0054 . ,
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Smernice za državno regionalno pomoč v obdobju 2007–2013" z 21. decembra 2005
– having regard to the draft Commission Communication of 21 December 2005, entitled 'Guidelines on National Regional Aid for 2007-2013'
UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str.
OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju okvira Skupnosti za državno pomoč za raziskave in razvoj
– having regard to the Community Framework for State aid for Research and Development
UL C, 17.2.96, str.
OJ C 45, 17.2.96, p.
6, kakor je bilo nazadnje spremenjeno s sporočilom Komisije o podaljšanju okvira Skupnosti za državno pomoč za raziskave in razvoj, UL C 310, 8.12.2005, str.
5 as last amended by Commission communication concerning the prolongation of the Community Framework for State Aid for Research and Development, OJ C 310, 8.12.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju rezultatov industrijskih naložb EU v raziskave in razvoj (R&R) iz 2005
– having regard to the 2005 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard
Objavila Komisija dne 9.12.2005. ,
Published by the Commission on 9.12.2005. ,
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije o državni pomoči in rizičnem kapitalu
– having regard to the Commission Communication on State aid and risk capital
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Več raziskav in inovacij – naložbe za rast in zaposlovanje: skupni pristop z 12. oktobra 2005,
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 12 October 2005, entitled 'More Research and Innovation - Investing for Growth and Employment: A Common Approach' ( COM(2005)0488 ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2204/2002 z dne 12. decembra 2002 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči na področju zaposlovanja
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment
UL L 337, 13.12.2002, str.
OJ L 337, 13.12.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju členov 2, 5, 81, 82, 87, 88 in 163 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 2, 5, 81, 82, 87, 88 and 163 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6–0073/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0073/2006 ),
A. ker EU namerava zmanjšati splošno raven državne pomoči in njeno prerazporeditev v korist horizontalnih ciljev,
A. whereas the EU aims to reduce the general level of State aid and its redeployment, in favour of horizontal objectives,
B. ker je raven inovacij v EU nižja od optimalne in zaostaja za svojimi trgovskimi partnerji tako na področju naložb v R&R kot tudi na področju rasti produktivnosti; ker je treba obrniti trend „bega možganov“ in tok naložb, ki sedaj poteka v smeri iz EU v druge dele sveta,
B. whereas the level of innovation in the EU is sub-optimal and lags behind its trading partners as regards both R&D investment and productivity growth; whereas the trend of the 'brain drain' and the investment flow from the EU to other parts of the world should be reversed,
C. ker je v primeru inovacij ter R&R horizontalna pomoč obstaja na področju, ki je življenjskega pomena za konkurenčnost EU ter na področju, na katerem naši konkurenti dajejo na razpolago bistveno več državne pomoči od tiste, ki je dovoljena v EU,
C. whereas in the case of innovation and R&D, horizontal aid exists in a field which is vital to the EU's competitiveness and one in which our competitors provide substantially more State aid than is permitted in the EU,
D. ker inovacijski postopki rabijo prostor za razvoj in preizkušanje,
D. whereas innovation processes need scope for development and room for experimentation,
E. ker je vrzel inovacijskih dosežkov med EU in njenimi svetovnimi konkurenti posledica dejavnikov, kot so majhne javne in zasebne naložbe v R&R, nezadostno število usposobljenih delavcev in zaviralni dejavniki v patentnih predpisih EU,
E. whereas the innovation performance gap between the EU and its global competitors is due to factors such as low public and private investment in R&D, an insufficient number of skilled workers, and disincentives inherent in EU rules on patents,
F. ker je javna podpora med dejavniki, ki vplivajo na odločitve o naložbah pri R&R, nizko uvrščena, ker se pomen neposredne javne podpore v različnih državah članicah lahko zelo razlikuje od ene do druge države članice in je eden izmed dejavnikov, ki jih podjetja morajo upoštevati pri svojih naložbenih odločitvah v R&R, ki ga ne bi smeli osamiti od poslovnega okolja, ki je naklonjen R&R ter bi moral biti predmet urejanja konkurenčnega prava EU,
F. whereas public support ranks very low among the factors influencing investment decisions in R&D; whereas the significance of direct public support varies considerably from one Member State to another and is one of the factors taken into account by enterprises for their investment decisions in R&D, which should not be isolated from an R&D-favourable business environment and should be subject to EC competition rules,
G. ker politika inovacij na področju R&R predstavlja izrazito majhen delež nacionalnih proračunov in BDP-ja držav članic, kar je tudi dejavnik, ki pripomore k zastoju pri izvrševanju ciljev lizbonske strategije in doseganju ciljev povečanja zaposlitve in kohezije,
G. whereas innovation policy in the fields of technology and R&D accounts for a manifestly small proportion of Member States' national budgets and GDP, which is in turn a factor that contributes to the delay in implementing the Lisbon Strategy objectives and achieving the goals of boosting employment and cohesion,
H. ker mora državna pomoč ostati izjema, sredstvo za popravo neravnovesij, ki se jih ni možno lotiti z običajnimi političnimi instrumenti, in ker nizka raven naložb v R&R zahteva obsežnejši politični pristop,
H. whereas State aid should remain the exception, an instrument to correct imbalances that cannot be addressed by regular policy instruments, and whereas the low level of investment in R&D requires a more comprehensive policy approach,
I. ker, skladno z zaključki predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Luksemburgu 22. in 23. marca 2005, bi morala državna pomoč imeti vlogo vzvoda pri razvoju raziskovanja, izobraževanja in inovacij in bi morala omogočati pristen dialog med zainteresiranimi skupinami javnega in zasebnega sektorja,
I. whereas, in line with the Presidency conclusions of the Luxembourg European Council of 22 and 23 March 2005, State aid should act as a lever for developing research, education and innovation, and should permit a genuine dialogue to take place between interested parties in the public and private sectors,
2. poudarja, da so potrebna dodatna pojasnila glede uporabe določb o državni pomoči pri mednarodnih čezmejnih gospodarskih dejavnostih podjetij ter raziskovalnih in akademskih ustanov;
Stresses that further clarification is needed on how State aid rules will apply to international cross-border economic activities of companies, research establishments and academic institutions;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj priskrbi podrobnejše podatke o možnih učinkih izkrivljanja, ko jih povzročijo državne pomoči, ter naj upošteva državne pomoči, ki jih dodeljujejo mednarodni konkurenti EU, tako na sektorski kot na vodoravni ravni in njihove možne učinke izkrivljanja in spodbude na svetovni ravni; poudarja, da so učinkovito vodenje inovacijske politike, primerjalna merila na mednarodni ravni, nadnacionalno učenje politike in nadzor ter presoja vplivov najustreznejši odgovori na izzive svetovne konkurenčnosti;
Asks the Commission to provide more detailed information about the possible distortional effects of State aid and to take into account State aid granted by the EU's international competitors, both at sectoral and horizontal level and its possible distortional and incentive effects on a global scale; points out that the effective governance of innovation policy, international benchmarking, trans-national policy learning, monitoring, and impact assessments are the most appropriate responses to the challenges of global competition;
NAČELA, KI UREJAJO NADZOR DRŽAVNE POMOČI ZA INOVACIJE
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING CONTROL OF STATE AID FOR INNOVATION
10. vztraja, da mora biti državna pomoč za inovacije začasna, dodeljena skladno s preglednimi in razumskimi merili, sorazmerna, strogo in učinkovito nadzorovana ter predmet občasnih presoj vpliva prek naknadnih analiz, ki jih izvajajo države članice in Komisija; vztraja, da mora državna pomoč upoštevati "oddaljenost od trga", z drugimi besedami netržno stopnjo inovacijskega postopka; poudarja, da ne sme biti večji pomen inovacij pretveza za dodeljevanje državne pomoči podjetjem;
Insists that State aid for innovation should be temporary, granted according to transparent and rational criteria, proportionate, strictly and effectively controlled, and subject to periodic impact assessments through ex post analyses conducted by the Member States and the Commission; insists also that State aid should take into account 'the remoteness from the market', in other words, the non-commercial phase of the innovation process; stresses that the increasing importance of innovation must not be a pretext for granting State aid to companies;
12. ocenjuje, da je izraz „neučinkovitost na trgu“ bolj primeren kot „neuspeh na trgu“ ter zahteva podrobnejšo in bolj uporabno opredelitev; predlaga, naj bo prepoznavanje ovir, ki omejujejo inovacije, kot tudi količinska opredelitev njihove dejanske vrednosti, predmet dodatnega pregleda;
Considers the term 'market inefficiency' more appropriate than 'market failure', and asks for a more detailed and operational definition; suggests that the identification of obstacles limiting innovation, as well as the quantification of its effective value, should be subject to further scrutiny;
18. meni, da so velika podjetja pomemben člen inovacijskega sistema in torej meni, da je možno dovoliti državno pomoč za velika podjetja, če podjetja med seboj sodelujejo (velika in mala podjetja, znanstvene ustanove) ter ob pogoju, da izpolnjujejo merila predhodnih pravil;
Regards large companies as an essential component of the innovation system and therefore considers that State aid to large companies is permissible if the companies cooperate with others (large businesses, small businesses, knowledge institutions) and provided that they meet the criteria of the ex ante rules;
22. meni, da so dodatna sredstva za regije neprimerna, če je dovoljena kumulacija državne pomoči; meni, da regionalni programi pomoči, če so dodani državni pomoči za inovacije, morajo biti združljivi s predpisi o notranjem trgu in konkurenci; nadalje meni, da je treba pripisati poseben pomen opredelitvi državne pomoči za inovacije in dostopa do nje v zvezi z regionalnimi majhnimi in srednjimi podjetji, za katera je bistveno, da imajo dostop do inovacij;
Considers that regional bonuses are inappropriate if State aid cumulation is permitted; considers that regional aid schemes, whenever additional to State aid for innovation, must be compatible with the internal market and competition rules; considers, moreover, that particular importance should be attached to the definition of and eligibility for State aid for innovation in relation to regional SMEs for which it is vitally important to have access to innovation;
PODPORA TVEGANJEM IN EKSPERIMENTIRANJU
SUPPORTING RISK-TAKING AND EXPERIMENTATION
26. predlaga zahtevo po obdobju obstoja, ki ga je treba podaljšati do 8 let za podjetja z daljšim ciklom R&R;
Proposes that the existence period requirement be extended to eight years for companies with a longer R&D cycle;
PODPORNO POSLOVNO OKOLJE ZA INOVACIJE
A SUPPORTIVE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT FOR INNOVATION
36. meni, da imajo skupine organski izvor in morajo zato biti le kratkoročno upravičene do državne pomoči, med začetno fazo, da premagajo upravne težave in ovire, povezane s sodelovanjem;
Believes that clusters originate in organic matter and therefore should be eligible for State aid only on a temporary basis, during the start-up phase, in order to meet administrative problems and obstacles linked with cooperation;
Evropska komisija je po celovitem paketu reform o pravilih državne pomoči predstavila dokument o posvetovanju o državni pomoči za inovacije.
Following the comprehensive reform package on State aid rules, the European Commission presented a consultation document on State aid for Innovation.