natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
25. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj skupaj oblikujejo kazalnike rezultatov, opredeljene na kazalnikih RCT, zlasti kar zadeva proračunsko pomoč, da bi nacionalni parlamenti in lokalne civilne družbe pa tudi Evropski parlament lahko videli rezultate prispevkov Evropske unije;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States jointly to identify performance indicators geared to the MDG indicators, in particular with regard to budgetary aid, so that national parliaments and local civil society, as well as the European Parliament, can trace back the results of EU contributions;
28. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, kako bi se pravična trgovina lahko preoblikovala v model trajne trgovinske politike, naj vzpodbuja uravnoteženo trgovino med severom in jugom ter ugotovi, katere trgovinske ovire najbolj škodijo najrevnejšim prebivalcem;
Calls on the Commission to undertake a study to examine how Fair Trade could develop into a model for sustainable trade policy which would be capable of stimulating balanced North-South trade, and to identify the obstacles to trade which impact most seriously on the world's poorest;
31. meni, da bi morale države prejemnice same demokratično sprejemati nacionalne in regionalne razvojne politike ter da bi morali demokratično izvoljeni parlamenti bolj pozorno spremljati izvajanje programa;
Believes that national and regional development policies must be democratically set by the beneficiary countries themselves and that democratically elected parliaments should exercise closer scrutiny of programme implementation;
34. poleg tega opozarja na pomen dobrega upravljanja, stabilne pravne države ter preglednih in predvidljivih regulativnih, pravnih in institucionalnih struktur kot predpogojev za razmere, ki so ugodne za gospodarski razvoj;
Refers, in addition, to the importance of good governance and of a stable, established rule of law, as well as of transparent and predictable regulatory, legal and institutional structures as necessary prerequisites for a climate that is favourable to economic development;
37. je seznanjen s predlogom Komisije o uvedbi prilagodljivega in trajnostnega instrumenta za doseganje RCT in poziva k natančnejši opredelitvi delovanja in pogojev upravljanja z njim;
Notes the Commission’s proposal to promote the setting-up of a flexible and sustainable instrument for the achievement of the MDGs and calls for further details to be provided regarding the operation and management procedures for this instrument;
40. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj poskrbijo za ustrezno obveščenost zainteresiranih strani v državah prejemnicah, med katere spadajo organizacije civilne družbe, da bi jim olajšali dostop do razpoložljivih programov;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that stakeholders in beneficiary countries, including civil society organisations, are supplied with the information required in order to make it easier for them to gain access to the programmes on offer;
43. poudarja, da so za večjo učinkovitost pomoči nujno potrebni otipljiv napredek na terenu, inovativni finančni instrumenti in dodatni viri, ki ne morejo nadomestiti že sprejetih obveznosti v obliki uradne razvojne pomoči;
Stresses that, in order to improve effective aid reflected by real progress on the ground, innovative financial instruments and additional resources are absolutely essential and cannot replace the undertakings already made in terms of ODA;
51. pozdravlja predlog Komisije za krepitev usklajevanja na področju razvojnega sodelovanja, povezanega s trgovino; v zvezi s tem poudarja potrebo po izboljšanju ukrepov usklajevanja med donatorji na splošno, še posebej pa na terenu; poudarja potrebo, da EU združi svoja prizadevanja za razvojno pomoč s prizadevanji mednarodnih donatorjev;
Welcomes the Commission's proposal to strengthen coordination in the area of trade-related development cooperation; stresses, in this context, the need for improved donor-wide coordination measures in general, and at field level in particular; stresses the need for the EU to pool its development aid efforts with those of other international donors;
Round for Free); poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj storita vse, da najmanj razvite države ne bodo postale žrtev interesov močnih trgovinskih blokov;
Reminds the Commission of its promise to give developing countries a 'Round for Free' in the WTO; calls on the Commission and the Council to do their utmost to prevent the least developed countries (LDCs) becoming the victims of the interests of strong trading blocs;
55. poziva vse razvite države in vse naprednejše države v razvoju, naj sledijo zgledu, ki ga je dala EU s pobudo "Vse razen orožja", tako da najmanj razvitim državam zagotovijo dostop do trga brez vsakršnih davkov ali kvot;
Calls on all developed countries and all advanced developing countries to follow the example set by the EU’s ‘Everything but Arms’ initiative by ensuring that market access for the LDCs is completely tax- and quota-free;
57. meni, da je kljub visokemu znesku finančne pomoči Evropske unije prav tako pomembno sprožiti obsežne reforme svetovnih finančnih in trgovinskih institucij, da bi upoštevali večrazsežnosti pristop, temelječ na pravicah;
Believes that, although the amount of financial aid earmarked by the European Union is important, it is also important to address substantive reforms of global financial and commercial institutions in order to incorporate a multidimensional and rights- based approach;
59. poziva k izvedbi revizije delovanja mednarodnih finančnih institucij, ki naj se začne s prilagoditvijo sistema glasovanja sedanji realnosti, države v razvoju pa naj pridobijo na moči, tako da se spremeni trenutno neuravnotežena sestava skupin držav;
Calls for a revision of the operation of International Financial Institutions (IFIs), the first step being to bring the voting system into line with the current situation, by giving added weight to developing countries and revising the currently unbalanced composition of constituencies;
61. želi spomniti na predlog iz omenjene resolucije o strateški reviziji mednarodnih finančnih institucij, da bo pogojevanje pomoči in dolgov le-teh opredeljeno znotraj tesnega sodelovanja z institucijami Združenih narodov; se zaveda, da je takšno pogojevanje v večini primerov negativno vplivalo na socio-ekonomske kazalnike držav v razvoju;
Recalls the suggestion contained in its aforementioned resolution on the strategic review of the IMF that the conditionality linked to IFI aid and loans be defined in the context of improved cooperation with the UN’s institutions, and recognises that this conditionality has, in many cases, had a negative impact on the socio-economic indicators of developing countries;
64. poudarja, da sta za učinkovitost pomoči, zlasti na lokalni ravni, pomembni skladnost različnih področij politike EU ter potrebna raven usklajevanja in dopolnjevanja ukrepov med EU in državami članicami; meni, da je nezadostna usklajenost v nasprotju s členom 178 Pogodbe ES;
Stresses the importance for the effectiveness of aid, particularly at local level, of coherence between the various EU policy areas and of the requisite levels of coordination and complementarity between the EU and its Member States as regards policies; considers that a lack of coherence conflicts with Article 178 of the EC Treaty;
V manj kot samo eni zadnji minuti je zaradi posledic lakote in revščine umrlo 11 otrok.
Over the last minute, in fact less than a minute, 11 children have died as a result of hunger and poverty.
Do jutri zjutraj jih bo umrlo 16.000.
By tomorrow morning, 16 000 more will have died.
Dobrodošli v resničnem svetu ...
Welcome to the real world.
Vpričo te ugotovitve so na največjem srečanju državnih voditeljev in vlad s celega sveta, kakršno pred tem še ni bilo sklicano, vstopili v XXI. stoletje s solidarnostno deklaracijo brez primere v zgodovini človeštva, tako imenovano Deklaracijo novega tisočletja za razvoj.
It was in the face of such developments that the 21st century opened with a declaration of solidarity unprecedented in the history of mankind, namely the Millennium Development Declaration, made at the world's largest-ever meeting of Heads of State and Government.
Voditelji s celega sveta so se s sprejetjem deklaracije, ki ima osem prednostnih ciljev, obvezali, da bodo naredili vse za zmanjšanje revščine in skrajne revščine za polovico do leta 2015, izboljšanje zdravja milijard ljudi, ustavitev širjenja hudih bolezni, kot so tuberkuloza ali HIV/aids, in upočasnitev poslabšanja okolja.
In adopting this declaration, which contained eight priority goals, leaders from all around the world undertook to take all the necessary measures to reduce poverty and extreme poverty by half by 2015, to improve the health of billions of people, to halt the spread of major diseases such as malaria and HIV/AIDS and to slow down environmental degradation.
To je pomemben korak za EU, ki je glavni donator na svetovni ravni.
This was an important step for the EU, the world's main donor group.
To je tudi pomemben korak za Afriko, kjer so po enotnem mnenju socialne, gospodarske in preprosto človeške razmere katastrofalne, kar še posebej velja za podsaharsko Afriko.
It was also an important step for Africa, whose social, economic and simply human situation is considered by all to be catastrophic, and more especially for Sub-Saharan Africa.
Leta 2005 se je Evropska unija pri prvi oceni ciljev tisočletja in na podlagi nezadovoljivih rezultatov zadnjih petih letih ter zaskrbljujočih obetov za države na jugu na srečanjih skupine G8 in svetovnega vrha obvezala, da bo spodbujala trajnostni človeški in socialni razvoj, pri čemer je imela vodilno vlogo.
In 2005, on the occasion of the first assessment of the Millennium Goals and on the basis of the unsatisfactory results recorded over five years and the alarming prospects for southern countries, the European Union made important undertakings and acted as a driving force in promoting sustainable human and social development at the G8 meetings and the World Summit.
S tem v zvezi se je za pomemben korak odločila s sprejetjem evropskega soglasja za razvoj in pripravo nove strategije za Afriko, kar pomeni novo upanje za milijone ljudi.
In this context, it decided to make a strong gesture by adopting its European Consensus for Development and drawing up a new strategy for Africa, a new hope for millions of people.
Med novimi cilji, ki si jih je postavila Unija na področju sodelovanja pri razvoju, to poročilo obravnava vprašanje učinkovitejše evropske pomoči južnim državam.
Among the new goals which the Union has set itself with respect to development cooperation, the issue which is the subject of this report concerns the improvement of the actual delivery of European aid to southern countries.
Učinkovitejša pomoč je nujna in vsi pričakujemo, da bo omogočila pomemben napredek pri uresničitvi ciljev tisočletja.
Improvements are essential in this area, and all of us hope that this will enable significant progress to be made in the implementation of the Millennium Goals.
Tri sporočila Evropske komisije, ki predstavljajo paket o učinkovitosti pomoči, pomenijo prvi konkreten korak v procesu izvajanja novega delovanja.
The three Commission communications that make up the aid effectiveness package are a first practical step in the process set in motion by this new project.
Poleg tega je prvič, da želi Komisija oblikovati strateški načrt ne le pomoči, ki jo nudi ali s katero upravlja, temveč tudi dvostranske pomoči, ki jo nudijo države članice, ki še naprej igrajo bistveno vlogo na področju sodelovanja.
This is also the first time that the Commission is aiming at strategic planning not only of the aid which it itself delivers and/or administers, but also of the bilateral aid delivered by Member States which continue to play a vital role in the cooperation sphere.
Če je prednostno obravnavanje izboljšanja učinkovitosti dejansko zasluga treh sporočil, moramo kljub temu ugotoviti, da ni v njih nikjer omenjeno, na kakšen način se bo ocenjeval pričakovan napredek glede učinkovitosti, niti kako bo EU zagotovila sredstva za svoje visoko zastavljene cilje.
Although these three communications are a positive development in that they treat the issue of improving effectiveness as a priority, it must be said that they do not contain any indication of how the expected progress in terms of effectiveness is to be assessed nor how the EU intends to finance its lofty ambitions.
Sploh ker istočasno ugotavljamo, da so države članice Evropske unije glede razvojne pomoči za leto 2005 kljub obveznostim, ki so jih sprejele v zvezi s tem, predlagale celo vrsto pobud, za katere se lahko upravičeno vprašamo – poleg splošnih načel v evropskem soglasju za razvoj – če resnično spadajo v okvir razvojnega sodelovanja, kot ga vsak od nas običajno razume, se pravi izvajanje solidarnostnih dejavnosti, ki predstavljajo konkretni napredek, od katerega imajo neposredno korist najrevnejši prebivalci sveta.
At the same time, it must also be said that, despite the commitments made, EU Member States included in the 2005 development aid programme a whole set of initiatives of questionable relevance (leaving aside the grand principles contained in the European Consensus for Development) to what can reasonably be considered as development cooperation in the commonly accepted meaning of the term, i.e. forms of solidarity resulting in tangible progress that is of direct benefit to the world's poorest populations.
Poleg umetnega povečevanja zneska razvojne pomoči, ki je resnično namenjen konkretni razvojni politiki, moramo ugotoviti, da velik del pomoči, ki jo odobrijo države članice EU, ne doseže prebivalcev držav na jugu, katerim je namenjena, bodisi zato, ker je manjša od obljubljene ali zato, ker je bilo načrtovanje ali dodeljevanje pomoči neustrezno, bodisi zaradi previsokih stroškov upravljanja ali pa zaradi preusmerjanja pomoči zaradi korupcije.
Apart from the problem of the artificial inflation of the PDA amounts actually allocated to specific development policies, it should be noted that a large proportion of the aid granted by all the EU Member States does not actually reach the people of southern countries for whom it is intended because the aid actually paid is less than what was promised, because planning or distribution proves inadequate, because of excessive administrative costs or because money is diverted owing to corruption.
Ob vsem tem se postavlja tudi vprašanje o našem načinu sodelovanja in tudi druga bistvena vprašanja, kot so transakcijski stroški za države prejemnice evropske pomoči, usklajevanje različnih programov sodelovanja Unije, usklajevanje postopkov in sistemov pomoči, dopolnjevanje različnih ukrepov, ki se izvajajo, usklajenost različnih politik Evropske unije, odpravljanje vezanosti razvojne pomoči v korist lokalnih proizvajalcev in prebivalcev na jugu ali skupno načrtovanje zlasti rokov.
All this raises serious questions regarding the manner in which we cooperate and should prompt us to look very closely at other fundamental issues such as the transaction costs imposed on countries in receipt of EU aid, the coordination of the Union's various cooperation programmes, the harmonisation of aid procedures and systems, complementarity between the different measures, consistency between the European Union's policies, the untying of development aid for the benefit of local producers and southern populations, joint programming and time frames.
Odgovor na ta vprašanja bo tudi odgovor na vprašanje, ali je treba EU na področju razvoja v prihodnje obravnavati kot 26. državo članico ali kot usklajevalni organ.
Answering these questions will also entail answering a further question, namely whether, in the area of development, the UE should in future be considered as a 26th Member State or as a coordinating body.
Potrebno pa je veliko sredstev, medtem ko novih ukrepov na področju razvojnega sodelovanja ni možno financirati na račun drugih dejavnosti, potrebnih za dosego ciljev tisočletja.
Substantial resources are required, and the new development cooperation measures must not be implemented at the expense of other activities that are needed in order to meet the Millennium Goals.
V zvezi z učinkovitostjo je treba pri tem razmisliti o razkoraku med obveznostmi Evropske unije in sredstvi, ki jih je namenila za njihovo izpolnitev.
Here again, in terms of effectiveness, the major disparity between the commitments made by the European Union and the resources which it allocates to meeting them is a cause for concern.
V tej zvezi ni nikoli odveč vztrajati pri tem, da moramo spoštovati obveznosti, ki smo jih sprejeli za dosego minimalnega skupnega cilja 0,7 % BDP vseh držav članic skupaj in EU, z namenom, da zagotovimo dodatna sredstva za učinkovito in okrepljeno razvojno pomoč.
In this connection, one cannot over-emphasise the need to honour the commitment we have made to meeting the collective target of at least 0.7% of the GNP of all the Member States and the EU, with the eminently practical aim of releasing additional funding for an effective, enhanced development aid effort.
Poleg tega je nujno ne le razvijati inovativne instrumente financiranja, temveč jih tudi konkretno izvajati in spoštovati obveznosti, ki smo jih sprejeli maja 2005, pri čemer se zavedamo, da morajo države članice vložiti 90 % dodatnega truda.
Furthermore, there is now an urgent need not only to devise innovative financial instruments but also to ensure that they are properly implemented, and to honour the commitments made in May 2005, on the understanding that 90% of the additional funding must be provided by the Member States.
V tem okviru sta učinkovitost in usklajevanje pomoči pomembnejša kot kdaj koli prej, če želimo, da EU izkoristi svoj položaj glavnega donatorja in tako pomembno prispeva k spreminjanju sveta ob spoštovanju vrednot, ki jih zagovarja, in zastavljenih ciljev v zvezi s trajnostnim razvojem in globalnim napredkom za vse.
Against this background, effective, coordinated aid is more important than ever if the EU is to take advantage of its position as the largest donor to make a significant contribution to changing the world in line with the values it espouses and the objectives it pursues as regards sustainable development and global progress shared by all.
Za odobritev optimalne višine pomoči morajo imeti države prejemnice zanesljive mehanizme in demokratične strukture, da dokažejo svojo sposobnost dobrega upravljanja finančne pomoči.
With a view to ensuring that the aid granted is allocated in the best possible manner, the beneficiary countries must, naturally, be able to demonstrate that they have reliable mechanisms and democratic structures - in short, the good governance required in order to manage such financial support.
Vendar pa ta zahteva prav tako potrebuje podporo (na primer na področju boja proti korupciji) in velja za vse akterje (medsebojna odgovornost), tudi za države donatorke.
But this in itself requires support (for example, in action against corruption) and applies to all involved (mutual accountability), including donor countries.
Če Evropska unija sodi, da so sistemi in postopki premalo zanesljivi, lahko sprejme ukrepe, potrebne za njihovo utrditev, namesto da bi jim škodovala z oblikovanjem vzporednih struktur.
Where it considers the systems and procedures to be too unreliable, the European Union could take appropriate measures to consolidate them rather than undermining them by creating parallel structures.
Na splošno države partnerice zlahka sprejmejo dejstvo, da je okrepitev njihovih lastnih zmogljivosti s prispevkom donatorjev bistvenega pomena za njihov razvoj.
Generally speaking, partner countries are willing to accept that building up their own capacities with the help of donors is an essential factor in their development.
Vseeno pa tisti, ki neposredno delujejo na tem področju, ugotavljajo, da je vključenost držav prejemnic manjša, saj težko same upravljajo strategije in programe, ki so jim namenjeni.
However, those involved on the ground say that there has been some loss in commitment on the part of the beneficiary countries, which are apparently finding it increasingly difficult to claim ownership of the strategies and programmes targeted at them.
Takšno stanje priča o tem, da bomo morali vložiti še veliko truda za večjo učinkovitost naše pomoči.
This situation is a further indication that major efforts are still required of us if we are to make our aid more effective.
Naše poročilo ne bi bilo popolno, če ne bi predvideli tudi vprašanja večje učinkovitosti naše pomoči glede na neizogibno vlogo, ki jo imajo finančne institucije in mednarodne organizacije (Svetovna banka, Mednarodni denarni sklad, regionalne banke,...) na tem področju.
Our report would not be complete if it failed to draw attention to the central role played by the international financial institutions and organisations (the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, regional banks, etc.) in making our aid more effective.
Poročilo poziva EU, naj se jasno opredeli glede vprašanja, ali bo na področju razvoja treba obravnavati Evropsko komisijo kot 26. državo članico ali usklajevalni organ.
Calls on the European Union clearly to state its position on whether, in connection with development-related matters, the Commission should be considered a twenty-sixth Member State or a coordinating body
Leto 2005 je bilo leto velikih obljub za občutno izboljšanje življenjskih razmer milijard ljudi, ki živijo v najrevnejših državah sveta.
2005 was a year in which great promises were made to secure a significant improvement in the lives of the populations of the world's poorest countries.
Če želimo biti ponosni na to, da smo Evropejci, moramo delati na tem, da bo leto 2006 leto izpolnitve obljub.
If we want to be proud to be Europeans, we must now ensure that 2006 is the year in which those promises are kept.
o okrepljenem in izboljšanem sodelovanju: paket 2006 o učinkovitosti pomoči EU
on more and better cooperation: the 2006 aid effectiveness package
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino poziva Odbor za razvoj kot pristojni odbor, da v predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
5. toplo pozdravlja odločenost EU, da vzpostavi inovativne sisteme za financiranje razvoja, ki bodo zagotavljali stabilnost, učinkovitost in predvidljivost pomoči;
Warmly welcomes the EU’s firm intention to set up innovative systems as regards financing for development, designed to guarantee aid that is stable, effective and predictable;
8. poudarja zlasti, da morajo odprtje trgovine dopolnjevati spremljajoči ukrepi glede okoljske zakonodaje, da se preprečita čezmerno onesnaževanje ter degradacija bistvenih ekosistemov, od katerih je odvisno preživetje revnih;
Stresses in particular that trade opening must be complemented by flanking measures in terms of environmental legislation to avoid large-scale pollution as well as degradation of vital eco-systems on which the livelihoods of the poor ultimately depend;
11. poudarja, da sta za zagotovitev učinkovite pomoči pomembna preglednost in boj proti korupciji; meni, da je korupcija glavna ovira za učinkovito sprostitev in dodelitev sredstev, s katerimi bi omogočili trajnostni gospodarski razvoj; se v zvezi s tem sklicuje na priporočila iz svoje resolucije z dne 6. aprila 2006 o učinkovitosti pomoči in korupciji v državah v razvoju
Stresses the importance, in the interests of effective aid, of transparency and the fight against corruption; takes the view that corruption is a major obstacle to the effective mobilisation and allocation of funds intended to make sustainable economic development possible; refers in this connection to the recommendations in its resolution of 6 April 2006 on aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries
Sprejeta besedila s tega dne, P6_TA(2006)0141 . ;
Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2006)0141 . ;