natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Parlament si želi smiselno razpravo, saj daje sedanji sistem, kjer največji delež predstavljajo prispevki iz držav članic, prevelik poudarek nacionalnim proračunom, kar otežuje vsakoletni potek proračunskega postopka.
Parliament hopes that there will be a meaningful discussion, because the current system, consisting mainly of national contributions to the EU budget, puts too much emphasis on national budgets, which makes the annual EU budget procedure very difficult.
Tudi zato je preveč pozornosti namenjene višini, ne pa vsebini proračuna.
That also means that there is now too much focus on the overall level, rather than on the content, of the EU budget.
Lastna sredstva so pomemben del sistema financiranja EU.
The own resources are an important part of the EU financing system.
Na samem začetku evropskih skupnosti so se te resda financirale iz prispevkov držav članic, vendar so že Rimske pogodbe leta 1957 takšno rešitev predvidele le za prehodno obdobje, dokler ne bi takratna Evropska gospodarska skupnost oblikovala lastnih virov.
Although at the very beginning, the European Communities were financed by national contributions, it was already laid down in the founding Treaty of Rome of 1957 that this would only be for a transitional period and that the then EEC would have to be financed entirely by a system of own resources, rather than by national contributions.
Leta 1970 je Svet sprejel sklep o nadomestitvi finančnih prispevkov držav članic z lastnimi sredstvi Skupnosti, ki določa, da so to kmetijske dajatve, carine in določen odstotek usklajene osnove davka na dodano vrednost.
Thus, in 1970 the Council adopted the Decision on the replacement of financial contributions from Member States by the Communities' own resources, stipulating that these would consist of agricultural levies, customs duties and a percentage of the harmonized VAT base.
Omenjene prispevke zbirajo države članice, ki jih nato prenesejo Komisiji.
(The member states are responsible for collecting the levies and transferring them to the European Commission.)
Z uvedbo rabata za Veliko Britanijo v 80-ih letih so države članice uvedle različne diferencirane stopnje DDV, kar je otežilo oblikovanje evropskega proračuna.
However, after the UK was granted a rebate and differentiated VAT rates were introduced for different member states to pay for that, putting together the EU budget became more and more difficult.
Države članice so se zato leta 1988 dogovorile o četrtem viru financiranja, ki temelji na višini bruto nacionalnega dohodka posamezne države članice.
For that reason, in 1988, a fourth source of funding, based on member states' Gross National Product was introduced.
Sčasoma je ta vir postal glavni, saj se je količina pobranih carin zmanjšala zaradi svetovnih prizadevanj za znižanje trgovinskih tarif, nižje pa so tudi kmetijske dajatve zaradi sprememb cen kmetijskih proizvodov.
This source has now become the system's main resource, as customs duties diminished due to worldwide efforts to bring down trade tariffs and as agricultural levies diminished due to changes in agricultural prices.
Evropska komisija je 19. oktobra v pregledu proračuna predstavila različne možnosti za spremembo sedanjega sistema financiranja.
The European Commission tabled a number of options for changing the current financing system in its recent budget review (19 October).
Parlament bi se rad sporazumel o postopku in časovnici prihodnjih pogovorov, da bi lahko dogovor med institucijami dosegli še pred rokom, ko bo morala EU sprejeti odločitev o naslednjem dolgoročnem proračunskem okviru .
What Parliament wants for now is an agreement on a procedure and an agenda for dialogue, so that an agreement can be reached before the EU has to decide on its next long-term budgetary framework (the “Multiannual Financial Framework, MFF”, also known as the “financial perspective”).
Zakaj se Parlament zdaj strinja s povečanjem za 2,91 odstotka?
Why has Parliament now agreed on an increase by 2.91%?
Komisija je institucija, ki upravlja in izvaja proračun EU, zato je v najboljšem položaju, da izračuna raven plačil za določeno leto.
The Commission is the institution which manages and implements the EU budget, which makes it best placed to calculate the level of payments for a certain year.
Poslanci Evropskega parlamenta so zato najprej potrdili oceno Komisije, po kateri naj bi se plačila za leto 2011 zvišala za 6 odstotkov in ne le za 2,9 odstotka.
MEPs had therefore voted to accept the Commission's estimate of necessary payments for 2011, 6% more rather than 2.9% more.
Svet je kot glavni pogoj za sprejetje dogovora o proračunu postavil znižanje ravni plačil glede na prvotni predlog.
The Council has put as its main condition for a budget agreement to have a lower level of payments.
Evropski poslanci se morda ne strinjajo, da je takšna zahteva realna, vedo pa, da so pomemben del proračuna obveznosti.
MEPs might not find this realistic, but they know that the important part of the budget is the level of commitments.
Dogovorjena raven plačil ureja zgolj časovni okvir (torej, kdaj je treba plačati račune), medtem ko so obveznosti politične odločitve, ki določajo, koliko in za kaj mora EU porabiti denar v kratkoročnem in dolgoročnem okviru.
The agreed level of payments merely regulates the timing – when the bills should be paid – whereas the commitments are the political decisions determining how much and on what the EU should spend in the short and long term.
Zaradi težkih gospodarskih razmer se Parlament zavzema, da bi bilo treba obveznosti povečati za približno 1 odstotek, kar je pod letno ravnjo inflacije.
Because of the difficult economic situation in the EU, Parliament advocates an increase in commitments of around 1%, below the level of inflation.
Ali Parlament zahteva spremembo Pogodbe?
Is Parliament asking for a treaty change?
Lizbonska pogodba določa, da Svet, Komisija in Parlament glede pogajanj o naslednjem dolgoročnem proračunskem okviru "ukrenejo vse potrebno za njegovo lažje sprejetje" (člen 312(5) Pogodbe o delovanju EU).
The Lisbon Treaty says that, regarding the negotiations on next long term budgetary framework (the “Multiannual Financial Framework - MFF”, also known as the “financial perspective”), the Council, the Commission and the Parliament "shall take any measure necessary to facilitate its adoption" (Article 312, §5 TFEU).
Glede letnih proračunov, večletnega finančnega okvira in virov lastnih sredstev na splošno velja, da zato "da bi olajšali izvajanje tega naslova predsedniki sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za spodbujanje posvetovanja in zbliževanje stališč institucij, ki jim predsedujejo."(člen 324 PDEU).
In general, when it comes to annual budgets, the MFF and own resources, the presidents of these three institutions "shall take all the necessary steps to promote consultation and the reconciliation of the positions of the institutions over which they preside in order to facilitate the implementation of this Title" (article 324 TFEU).
Parlament si želi, da se doseže dogovor o tem, kaj to pomeni v praksi - torej, da se določi pragmatičen način dela.
What Parliament wants is to agree on what this means in practice - that is to determine a pragmatic working method.
Ali si Parlament v prihodnje želi višji proračun?
Does Parliament want a higher budget for the future?
Ni nujno.
Not necessarily.
Evropski poslanci si želijo, da bi bil proračunski okvir (zgornja meja) za leti 2012 in 2013 dovolj prožen, da bi omogočil financiranje novih nalog, ki jih je EU prevzela v času odkar je bil okvir določen pred petimi leti.
MEPs want the budget framework (= upper limits) for 2012 and 2013 to be flexible enough to make room for the new tasks the EU has taken on since the framework was decided five years ago.
To vključuje proračunske možnosti za službo za zunanje delovanje, za ukrepe za preprečevanje prihodnjih finančnih kriz, vključno z večjim proračunom za nove organe finančnega nadzora, za okrepitev boja proti podnebnim spremembam in za projekt raziskav fuzijske energije ITER, ki je zelo pomemben za države članice.
This includes budgetary room for the External Action Service, work to prevent future financial crises, including an increased budget for the new financial supervisory authorities, and the stepped up fight against climate change, as well as the nuclear fusion energy research project "ITER", which is highly valued by the Member States.
Kaj pomeni vztrajanje Parlamenta pri "prožnosti" proračuna?
What does it mean that Parliament insists on "flexibility" for the budget?
Drugo pomembno vprašanje za Parlament, ki zadeva pomislek, da ni dovolj denarja na razpolago za izvajanje sklepov Sveta, so tako imenovane razpoložljive razlike za prožnost.
Another important issue for the Parliament - out of concern that there is enough money available to implement the decisions taken by the Council - is the so-called "flexibility" margin.
To pomeni, da se lahko v primeru, če obstaja resnična, vendar nepričakovana potreba po precejšnjem dodatnem znesku, v proračun vnesejo dodatna sredstva v vrednosti 0,03 odstotka bruto nacionalnega dohodka Unije.
This means that if there is a real, but unexpected, need for substantial extra money, then additional funds can be put into the EU budget, to the value of 0.03% of Gross National Income.
V preteklosti je takšno "prožnost" Svet uporabljal za financiranje evropskega satelitskega sistema Galileo, ublažitev krize s hrano v afriških državah ter financiranje svežnja za oživitev gospodarstva, ki je bil pripravljen v prejšnjem letu.
In the past, this "flexibility" has been used by the Council to finance the European satellite system Galileo, to alleviate the food crisis in African countries, and to fund the economic recovery package put together last year.
Svet zdaj pravi, da mora v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo o sprostitvi sredstev za "prožnost" odločati s soglasjem, medtem ko je prej odločal s kvalificirano večino, Parlament pa s 60 odstotno večino glasov.
The Council is now saying that, following the Lisbon Treaty, it needs to decide by unanimity on releasing the 0.03% "flexibility", whereas it used to be by qualified majority in Council with a 3/5 majority vote in the Parliament.
Postopek je bil določen z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (točka 22, druga alinea).
This was laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement between the Parliament, Council and Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (point 22, second indent).
Po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe je treba pogajanja o tem sporazumu spet odpreti, opustitev tega vprašanja pa bi pomenila, da lahko vsaka posamezna država članica prepreči sprejetje odločitve Sveta.
This agreement now needs to be renegotiated following the Lisbon Treaty, but discarding this aspect would mean that any single Member State can block the decision in Council.
Ali si Parlament želi več pristojnosti v zvezi s proračunom EU?
Does Parliament want more powers over the EU budget?
Parlament zahteva samo izvajanje Lizbonske pogodbe.
What Parliament wants is an implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, nothing more, nothing less.
Lizbonska pogodba poslancem Evropskega parlamenta, kot neposredno izvoljenim predstavnikom približno 500 milijonov evropskih državljanov, daje določene pristojnosti.
The Lisbon Treaty gives MEPs, as the directly elected representatives of some 500 million EU citizens, certain powers.
Parlament se želi dogovoriti, kako naj bi se izvajale v praksi.
What Parliament want is to agree on how these should be implemented in practice.
Poslanci se želijo glede oblikovanja naslednjega dolgoročnega proračunskega okvira z drugimi institucijami dogovoriti o metodi delovanja.
Regarding the setting up of the next long term budgetary framework (the “Multiannual Financial Framework - MFF”, also known as the “financial perspective”), MEPs want to agree on a working method with the other institutions.
Za sprejetje novega večletnega finančnega okvira je namreč obvezna odobritev Parlamenta.
Parliament's consent is a requirement for a new MFF.
Parlament je predlagal model na podlagi prejšnjih medvladnih konferenc, po katerem bi trije poslanci sodelovali na vseh razpravah, da bi se nato v Parlamentu lahko omogočilo sprejetje predlaganega besedila in preprečil zastoj.
Parliament has suggested a model inspired by earlier Intergovernmental Conferences, with three MEPs participating in all discussions, to facilitate adoption in Parliament of the text proposed and avoid a deadlock.
Kakšne so bile zahteve Parlamenta med pogajanji?
What were Parliament's demands during the negotiations?
Konferenca predsednikov je oblikovala sedem zahtev, ki so se na koncu zožile le na eno: Svet naj se jasno zaveže, da se bo oblikoval dogovor, ki bo omogočil udeležbo Parlamenta v prihodnjih pogovorih o sistemu financiranja EU in večletnem proračunskem okviru.
The Conference of Presidents formulated seven demands, which comes down to a firm commitment from Council that an arrangement will be set up to involve Parliament in future talks on the EU financing system (the Multiannual Framework).
Začetnih sedem točk:
The original seven points were:
Potreben je dejanski strateški dialog s Svetom, kot zahteva pogodba.
Need for a genuine strategic dialogue with the Council [as required by the treaty]
Zadostna skupna raven porabe.
Sufficient overall level of spending
Poudarek na evropski dodani vrednosti - Komisija bi morala izvesti študijo o tem, kaj državljani pridobijo s porabo denarja na evropski, namesto na nacionalni ravni.
Focus on 'European Added Value' [the Commission should make a study, presenting what citizens gain by spending money at EU level rather than national level]
"Lizbonizacija" proračuna - sedanji proračunski okvir je treba posodobiti glede na nove naloge EU iz Lizbonske pogodbe, kot je Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje.
"Lisbonisation" of the budget [make the current budget framework up-to-date with the EU's new tasks, such as the EEAS, stemming from the Lisbon treaty]
Vmesni pregled: prilagoditev sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira za leti 2012 in 2013 - proračuna ni treba nujno povečati, temveč omogočiti lizbonizacijo, ukrepe proti finančni krizi in druge nove projekte.
Mid-Term review: adjustment of the current MFF for years 2012 and 2013 [not necessarily making the budget higher, but give room for Lisbonisation, financial crises measures and other new projects]
Pomembna lastna sredstva: začetek razprave o novih načinih financiranja proračuna EU, predvsem dogovor o metodi dela in časovnem razporedu.
Meaningful Own Resources [start a discussion about new ways of funding the EU budget, in this first step agreeing on nothing else but a working method and a calendar]
Ustrezna vključenost v priprave in pogajanja v zvezi z naslednjim večletnim finančnim okvirom, kot zahteva pogodba.
Proper involvement in preparations and negotiations on the next MFF [as required by the treaty]
Dogovora ni.
There is no agreement.
Kaj zdaj?
So what happens now?
Komisija je napovedala, da bo nov osnutek proračuna pripravila čim prej.
The Commission has announced that it will prepare a new draft budget as quickly as possible.
Potem, ko bo predlog pripravljen, mora Svet v enem mesecu sprejeti svoje stališče, nato pa imajo poslanci na voljo 42 dni, da ga potrdijo.
After this proposal, the Council must adopt its position within one month and after this, MEPs have 42 days to decide whether to approve it.
To so skrajni časovni roki postopka - institucije lahko seveda sprejmejo svoja stališča prej, če želijo doseči dogovor do konca decembra.
These are the maximum limits - the institutions could of course adopt their positions much faster, aiming at an agreement in December.
Parlament polaga upe na voditelje držav in vlad EU, ki se bodo sestali na vrhu 16. in 17. decembra, da jim bo uspelo odpravili zastoj.
Parliament is counting on the EU Heads of State and Government, who will meet for a summit on 16-17 December, to break the deadlock.
Kakšne bodo posledice, če se bo treba zateči k sistemu začasnih dvanajstin?
What will be the consequences of having to fall back on the system of provisional twelfths?
Dokler proračuna za leto 2011 ne bo, se bo uporabljal proračun prejšnjega leta, letne vsote pa bodo razdeljene na 12 mesečnih delov, kar sicer pomeni resne ovire, ne pa strahotnih posledic.
As long as there is no 2011 budget, the budget of the previous year will be used, with the annual sums divided up in 12 monthly parts.
Rešitev te težave je v členu 315 Pogodbe, ki navaja, da lahko Svet s kvalificirano večino na podlagi predloga Komisije sklene dodati potrebna sredstva.
The solution to that problem lies in Art. 315 of the Treaty, which that says "on the basis of a Commission proposal, the Council, by qualified majority, can decide to add the necessary funds".
Evropski parlament ima nato na voljo 30 dni, da sprejme ali zmanjša to vsoto.
The European Parliament then needs to approve or reduce this amount within 30 days.
To bo nujno potrebno zlasti na področju kmetijstva.
Especially in the field of agriculture, this will be urgent.
Države članice so kmetom odobrile izplačilo subvencij v višini 30 milijard evrov, ki jih mora Evropska komisija nakazati januarja 2011.
Member States have advanced direct payments to farmers to an amount of €30 billion and the European Commission has to compensate them in January 2011.
Na podlagi začasnih dvanajstin bo imela Komisija na voljo le 6 milijard, kar pomeni, da bo nastala težava.
On the basis of provisional twelfths, the Commission will only have €6 billion available – so the Member States and the Commission have a problem.
Proračunske težave bodo imele tudi vse na novo sprejete, saj v proračunu za leto 2010 zanje ni bilo predvidenega denarja, ali pa je bila vsota zelo nizka.
All newly decided policies will encounter budgetary problems, since there was no (or only a little) money for them in the 2010 budget.
Povezave do dodatnih informacij
Links to further details
Spodnje povezave ponujajo dodatne informacije in ozadje glede odziva Parlamenta na konec spravnega postopka in glede proračuna za leto 2011 Sporočilo za javnost ob neuspehu pogajanj (16.
The links below offer further information and background on Parliament's reaction to the end of the conciliation procedure and on the 2011 EU budget.
Zastoj pri sprejemanju proračuna EU: razprava z Barrosom in belgijskim predsedstvom
EU budget impasse: debate with Barroso and Belgian presidency
Poslanci bodo v torek s predsednikom Komisije Joséjem Manuelom Barrosom in predstavniki belgijskega predsedstva Sveta EU razpravljali o zastoju pri sprejemanju proračuna Unije za leto 2011, v sredo pa bodo glasovali o resoluciji, ki jo predlagajo voditelji političnih skupin.
MEPs will debate the deadlock over the 2011 EU budget with Commission President José Manuel Barroso and the Belgian Council presidency, and will vote on a resolution drawn up by the political group leaders.
Pogajanja med Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom ministrov o proračunu za prihodnje leto so 15. novembra zašla v slepo ulico, ko je nekaj držav članic zavrnilo pobudo za pogovore o tem, kako vključiti Parlament v prihodnje razprave o sistemu financiranja EU.
Negotiations between Parliament and the EU Council of Ministers on next year's budget reached an impasse on Monday after a refusal by a minority of governments to discuss how to involve Parliament in talks on the EU financing system.
Pogajalska skupina Parlamenta je vnovič izrazila pripravljenost, da podpre predlog Sveta o omejitvi zvišanja izplačil v letu 2011 na 2,91 odstotka, medtem ko je zvišanje so obveznosti že omejeno na 1 odstotek, kar je sicer pod predvideno ravnjo inflacije.
The EP negotiating team had reiterated its willingness to accept the level of spending proposed by the Council (an increase in 2011 payments of 2.91 per cent), while it had already capped commitments (which determine payments) at a below-inflation figure of 1 per cent.
Poslanci so še ponovili željo, da bi čimprej začeli pogovore o tem, kako bi lahko Parlament sodeloval pri reviziji sistema proračunskega financiranja EU, da bi bil ta manj občutljiv na krizne razmere, želijo pa tudi doseči njegovo večjo prožnost.
However, the MEPs also repeated their desire to open talks about how Parliament can be involved in a review of the EU budget financing system in order to make it less crisis-prone, as well as to include some flexibility in the budgets.
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101115IPR94710 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101115IPR94710 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101112NEW94628 FULL-TEXT DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101112NEW94628 FULL-TEXT DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101112NEW94628 ITEM-002-SL DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101112NEW94628 ITEM-002-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Zdravila na recept: pravica bolnikov do obveščenosti
A ban on disguised advertising of prescription drugs
Države članice pa bodo morale informacije o zdravilih objavljati na posebnih namenskih spletnih straneh.
They also want Member States to be required to provide information on medicines on dedicated websites.
Osnovni namen zakonodaje je zagotoviti dostopnost kakovostnih, objektivnih, zanesljivih in nepromocijskih informacij o zdravilih.
The basic aim of the legislation is to ensure the availability of good-quality, objective, reliable and non-promotional information on medicines.
Poročili je pripravil poslanec Christofer Fjellner (ELS, SE).
Parliament deals with the proposals in two reports drafted by Christofer Fjellner (EPP, SE).
Obvezne in pogojne Informacije farmacevtskih družb
Compulsory and optional information to be supplied by pharmaceutical firms
Farmacevtska podjetja bodo lahko obveščala javnost tudi z drugimi dobro opredeljenimi nepromocijskimi informacijami, na primer o vplivu proizvoda na okolje ali o cenah oziroma spremembah na embalaži, morajo pa za to imeti predhodno dovoljenje pristojnih organov.
In addition, pharmaceutical companies may provide the public with other well-defined non-promotional information, for example on the environmental impact of the product or on prices or pack changes, although they would need prior approval from the relevant authorities.
Informacije bodo morale biti na voljo v elektronski in v tiskani obliki, s poslanskim dopolnilom pa tudi v pisavi za slepe.
MEPs want it to be available in formats appropriate for the blind and partially-sighted as well.
Prepoved pošiljanja nenaročenih informacij
No unsolicited information
Tiskano gradivo se bo lahko pošiljalo posameznikom samo na njihovo izrecno zahtevo.
The Commission is proposing that information from pharmaceutical companies on prescription drugs should not be broadcast on radio or TV.
Obveznosti držav članic
Member States' obligation to provide information
Parlamentarci predlagajo dodaten člen, ki bi od držav zahteval, da javnosti zagotovijo dostopnost objektivnih in nepristranskih informacij o zdravilih, ki so naprodaj na njihovem trgu.
MEPs add a new article to the legislation, obliging Member States to ensure that "objective, unbiased information" is available to the general public on medicinal products sold in that Member State.
Informacije bi morale biti objavljene tako na posebnih, v ta namen vzpostavljenih spletnih straneh, kakor tudi v tiskani obliki ter v formatih, ki bodo prilagojeni slepim in slabovidnim osebam.
This information too would have to be made available in electronic form (on dedicated websites set up by the Member State) and in printed form and in a format accessible to people with disabilities.
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A7-2010-0290 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A7-2010-0290 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A7-2010-0289 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A7-2010-0289 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101112NEW94628 ITEM-001-SL DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101112NEW94628 ITEM-001-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101112NEW94628 ITEM-003-SL DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20101112NEW94628 ITEM-003-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Manj nevarnih snovi v električnih aparatih
Keeping toxic substances out of electrical goods