natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zadeva: Pravna podlaga predloga sklepa Sveta o podpisu v imenu Evropske unije Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi slednje pri izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda (13054/2004 – KOM(2004)0593 – C6-0241/2004 2004/0199(CNS) )
Subject: Legal basis of the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the latter's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen Acquis (13054/2004 - COM(2004)0593 – C6-0241/2004 - 2004/0199(CNS) - )
Sporazum zadeva pridružitev Švice pri izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda.
The agreement in question concerns Switzerland’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis .
Sporazum uvaja obveznost Švice za sprejetje in uporabo sedanjega in prihodnjega schengenskega pravnega reda.
Pursuant to the agreement, Switzerland is required to accept and apply the Schengen acquis , both present and future.
Člen 3 Sporazuma ustanavlja mešani odbor predstavnikov švicarske vlade, članov Sveta Evropske unije in Komisije, ki ima pooblastila za odločanje na nekaterih področjih.
Pursuant to Article 3 of the Agreement a Mixed Committee [sic] comprising representatives of the Swiss Government and members of the Council of the European Union and the Commission is set up and is invested with decision-making powers in certain areas.
Pojavlja se vprašanje, ali se mora takšen mešani odbor šteti za „poseben institucionalni okvir, ki ureja postopke sodelovanja“ v smislu druge alinee člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, za kar je potrebno mnenje Evropskega parlamenta.
The question which arises is that of deciding whether the Mixed Committee should or should not be deemed to constitute ‘a specific institutional framework by organising cooperation procedures’ within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which Parliament’s assent is required.
Glej zlasti sodbo SES z dne 23. februarja 1999, Primer C-42/97, Parlament/Svet, 1999, Zbirka str.
See in particular ECJ Judgement of 23 February 1999 in case C-42/97, Parliament/Council, ECR 1999, p.
Zato je pravna podlaga zadevnega predloga sklepa Sveta napačna, ker bi morala navajati drugo alineo člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, ki predvideva ustrezen postopek za pridobitev mnenja, namesto prve alinee člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, ki predvideva enostaven postopek za pridobitev mnenja.
Hence the legal basis selected for the proposal for a Council decision in question is not the right one; it should be the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty (which provides for the assent procedure), rather than the first paragraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which Parliament is merely consulted.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je na seji z dne 31. marca 2005 tako ob upoštevanju navedenih mnenj in na predlog poročevalca za pravno podlago Manuela Medina Ortege soglasno odločil
At its meeting of 31 March 2005 the Committee on Legal Affairs decided unanimously
Odbor za pravne zadeve zato meni, da bi moral Evropski parlament zahtevati ponovno posvetovanje v zvezi s podpisom zadevnega sporazuma.
Hence the Committee on Foreign Affairs considers that Parliament should ask to be consulted again regarding the conclusion of the abovementioned agreement.
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o podpisu v imenu Evropske skupnosti Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švico o kriterijih in mehanizmih za določitev države, pristojne za obravnavane zahteve za pridobitev azila, ki je vložena v državi članici ali Švici
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Community of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland
Posvetovanje z Odborom regij Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Committee of the Regions consulted Date of decision in plenary
Predlog sklepa Sveta o podpisu v imenu Evropske unije Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi slednje pri izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the latter's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen Acquis.
o uporabi členov 4 in 5 Direktive 89/552/EGS „Televizija brez meja“, spremenjene z Direktivo 97/36/ES, za obdobje 2001–2002
on the application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/EEC (the “TV without Frontiers” Directive), as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, for the period 2001-2002
– ob upoštevanju rezultatov javnega posvetovanja, organiziranega s strani Komisije, o uporabi členov 4 in 5,
– having regard to the results of the public consultation held by the Commission on the application of Articles 4 and 5,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 89/552/EGS z dne 3. oktobra 1989 o uskladitvi nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov
– having regard to Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities
UL L 298, 17.10.1989, str.
OJ L 298, 17.10.1989, p.
23. , spremenjeno z Direktivo Evropskega Parlamenta in Odbora 97/36/ES z dne 30. junija 1997
23. , as amended by European Parliament and Council Directive 97/36/EC of 30 June 1997
UL L 202, 30.7.1997, str.
OJ L 202, 30.7.1997, p.
– ob upoštevanju evropske konvencije o čezmejni televiziji Sveta Evrope iz leta 1989,
– having regard to the Council of Europe’s 1989 European Convention on Transfrontier Television,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o prihodnosti evropske regulativne politike na avdiovizualnem področju (KOM(2003) 0784),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on the future of European regulatory audiovisual policy (COM(2003)784),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o načelih in smernicah avdiovizualne politike Skupnosti v obdobju digitalizacije ( KOM(1999)0657 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication on principles and guidelines for the Community's audiovisual policy in the digital age ( COM(1999)0657 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 151 in 157 Pogodbe ES, Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske Unije ter amsterdamskega protokola (javni sistemi oddajanja),
– having regard to Articles 151 and 157 of the EC Treaty, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and the Amsterdam Protocol (public radio broadcasting systems),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2003 o „Televiziji brez meja“
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2003 on Television without Frontiers
UL C 76 E, 25.3.2004, str.
OJ C 76E , 25.3.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 4. oktobra 2001 o tretjem poročilu Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnem odboru, v zvezi z uporabo Direktive 89/552/EGS o „Televiziji brez meja“
– having regard to its resolution of 4 October 2001 on the third report of the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee on the application of Directive 89/552/EEC (Television without Frontiers)
UL C 87 E, 11.4.2002, str.
OJ C 87E, 11.4.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 2. julija 2002 o sporočilu Komisije v zvezi z nekaterimi pravnimi vidiki, povezanimi s filmskimi in avdiovizualnimi deli
– having regard to its resolution of 2 July 2002 on the on the Commission communication on certain legal aspects relating to cinematographic and other audiovisual works
UL C 271 E, 12.11.2003, str.
OJ C 271E, 12.11.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju stališča z dne 12. februarja 2004 o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ki spreminja Sklep Sveta 2000/821/ES z dne 20. decembra 2000 o izvajanju programa za spodbujanje razvoja, distribucije in promocije evropskih avdiovizualnih del
– having regard to its position of 12 February 2004 on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision modifying Council Decision 2000/821/EC of 20 December 2000 on the implementation of a programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works
UL C 97 E, 22.4.2004, str.
OJ C 97E, 22.4.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 26. septembra 2002 o akcijskem načrtu Evropske unije za uspešno uveljavitev digitalne televizije v Evropi
– having regard to its resolution of 26 September 2002 on an EU action plan for the successful introduction of digital television in Europe
UL C 273 E, 14.11.2003, str.
OJ C 273E, 14.11.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6–0202/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0202/2005 ),
A. ker želi lizbonska strategija okrepiti kapaciteto inovativnosti evropske industrije, iz EU narediti najbolj konkurenčno in najbolj dinamično gospodarstvo znanja na svetu,
A. whereas the Lisbon strategy seeks to reinforce the innovative capacity of European industry and to make the EU the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world,
B. ker so za avdiovizualen sektor značilna tehnološka inovativnost, ter socialni, gospodarski in kulturni vpliv,
B. whereas the audiovisual sector is characterised both by technological innovation and by its social, economic and cultural impact,
C. ker je zaščita posebnosti kulturnih dobrin, med katere spada tudi avdiovizualni sektor, v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) prednostna naloga Unije, z obžalovanjem, da Komisija ni upoštevala te smernice, ki predlaga vključitev avdiovizualnega sektorja v področje uporabe direktive v zvezi s storitvami na notranjem trgu;
C. whereas one of the EU’s priorities is to defend the specific nature of cultural assets, including those in the audiovisual sector, within the World Trade Organisation (WTO); whereas the Commission regrettably failed to act in accordance with that principle by proposing to incorporate the audiovisual sector into the scope of the directive on services in the Internal Market,
D. ker je razširjanje evropskih del in del samostojnih producentov bistveno za spodbujanje kulturne raznolikosti, svobode izražanja in pluralnosti,
D. whereas the movement of European works and the works of independent producers is essential in order to promote cultural diversity, freedom of expression and pluralism,
E. ker mora Direktiva 89/552/EGS, ustanovljena v smislu enotnega trga, bolj upoštevati težnje pravnega prostora Skupnosti, državljanstva in politične Unije,
E. whereas Directive 89/552/EEC, which arose in the context of the Single Market, must take more account of the aspirations relating to a Community area of law, citizenship and political Union,
F. ker je razen tega zastarela zaradi hitrega razvoja novih tehnologij, ki bo hitro privedel do neomejene ponudbe na področju evropskega avdiovizualnega prizorišča, ter ker je predpise Direktive 89/552/EGS treba prilagoditi tehnološkemu razvoju;
F. whereas that Directive is also obsolete in the light of the rapid development of new technology, which will soon result in unlimited supply in the context of the European audiovisual landscape, making it necessary to adapt the rules of Directive 89/552/EEC to technological developments,
G. ker je njena uporaba odvisna od držav članic in njihovih pristojnih nacionalnih organov, hkrati pa ima Komisija pomembno vlogo pri ocenjevanju in nadzoru, pri čemer morajo sodelovati Evropski parlament, nacionalni parlamenti, nacionalni upravni organi in javno mnenje,
G. whereas it is the responsibility of the Member States and their national competent authorities to apply the Directive, but whereas the Commission plays an essential evaluating and supervisory role, in which the European Parliament, the national parliaments, the national regulatory authorities and public opinion must all be involved,
H. ker Direktiva 89/552/EGS, s prilagodljivim okvirom, ki omogoča izvajanje predpisov s strani držav članic in samourejanje avdiovizualne industrije, igra pomembno vlogo kot direktiva, ki ustvarja najmanjši okvir,
H. whereas Directive 89/552/EEC, a flexible framework which has permitted the application of rules by the Member States and self-regulation by the audiovisual industry, plays an important role in establishing a minimum framework,
I. z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da se določene določbe Direktive (kvote, oglaševanje ...) v nekaterih državah članicah zaradi pomanjkanja ustreznega nadzora ne uporabljajo in spoštujejo v zadostni meri,
I. concerned to note that certain provisions in the Directive (on quotas, advertising, etc.) are inadequately applied and observed in certain Member States due to a lack of appropriate supervision,
J. ker mora biti vsem zagotovljen dostop do večje in bolj raznolike ponudbe storitev.
J. whereas the growth in the number and diversity of the services on offer must go hand in hand with access for all,
Uporaba členov 4 in 5 Direktive
Application of Articles 4 and 5 of the Directive
2. obžaluje dejstvo, da se je v referenčnem obdobju, analiziranem v šestem poročilu Komisije o izvajanju členov 4 in 5, delež samostojnih produkcij v štirih letih zmanjšal za 3,48 procentov (stran 7 poročila);
Regrets the fact that over the reference period analysed in the Commission's 6th report on the implementation of Articles 4 and 5, the proportion of independent productions has declined by 3.48% over four years (page 7 of the report);
4. poudarja, da bi bila 10-odstotna kvota na vrednost (in ne na efektivno uro) primernejši kazalec za ugotavljanje skladnosti s členom 5, s čimer bi odpravili nesporazume med državami članicami o tem, kaj sestavlja efektivne ure;
Stresses that a more consistent indicator to measure compliance with Article 5 would be to establish the 10% quota by value (and not by qualifying hours), thus removing the inconsistencies observed among the Member States on what counts as qualifying hours;
7. zahteva, da države članice v zameno za svobodo pri izvajanju člena 4 izdelajo zadovoljivo sporočilo o natančnih in preglednih javnih kazalcih;
Calls for the discretion which the Member States are permitted in applying Article 4 to at least be compensated for by the communication of public, precise and transparent indicators;
9. ugotavlja, da so kvote evropskih del v večji meri zapolnjene z nacionalnimi deli, in zagovarja prostovoljne pobude povečevanja kvot nenacionalnih evropskih del;
Notes that most of the quotas for “European works” are filled by national works and supports voluntary initiatives for further quotas for European works from other countries;
Komisijo opozarja na dejstvo, da je zaradi vdora produkcijskih skupin na evropske trge nujno treba pospeševati podporo evropski posebnosti vsebin in njen razvoj z vzpostavljanjem vezi s sredstvi financiranja;
Draws the Commission’s attention to the fact that, given the way in which production groups have attacked the European markets, it seems essential to encourage aid for solely European content and to develop such content by establishing a link with sources of finance;
Revizija direktive
Review of the Directive
18. zagotavlja, da mora evropski avdiovizualni model temeljiti na ravnovesju med trdnimi in samostojnimi javnimi storitvami ter dinamičnim trgovinskim sektorjem, ki prispevajo k posrednim in neposrednim zaposlitvam; ocenjuje, da je nadaljnji obstoj tega modela nujen za vitalnost in kakovost ustvarjanja ter potreben zakonodajni okvir za zagotavljanje spoštovanja pravic Evropejcev;
Believes that the European audiovisual model must be founded on a balance between a strong and independent public service sector and a dynamic commercial sector, both of which are directly and indirectly creators of jobs; considers it essential, in the interests of the vitality and quality of creative work, that this model continue, for which a legislative framework is required to ensure that Europeans’ rights are respected;
24. se boji, da dajeta, v primeru tako pomembne teme, razprava in posvetovanja prednost gospodarskim presojam in medvladnim sporazumom; se zaveda, da sam trg ne bo rešil težav in da morajo institucije ponujati odgovore na zaskrbljenost Evropejcev v zvezi s kulturnimi vsebinami televizije;
Fears that, on such an important subject, the debate and the consultations will give priority to economic considerations and inter-governmental transactions; realises that the market alone will not resolve the problems and that the institutions must respond to the concerns of Europeans about the cultural content of television;
29. poudarja, da mora revizija omogočati zagotavljanje pravnih obveznosti in trdne politične volje v zvezi z ostro ločitvijo med izdajateljsko in umetniško vsebino na eni strani ter trgovsko ponudbo na drugi strani;
Stresses that the review of the directive must make it possible to assert legal obligations and a firm political will to make a strict separation between editorial and artistic content on the one hand and commercial promotion on the other;
35. se veseli, ob upoštevanju novih tehnoloških razvojev, kot je napredek na področju konvergence in digitalizacije, predloga, ki ga je objavila Komisija v zvezi s ponovno preučitvijo direktive o televiziji, da bo razširila področje direktive na vse storitve na podlagi spremenjenega pravnega pristopa;
Welcomes, in the light of technological developments (such as increasing convergence and the move to digital), the Commission’s announcement, in its connection with revision of the directive, of a proposal to extend its scope to cover all services based on the principle of a differing levels of regulation;
39. zahteva, da se posebna pozornost nameni dostopu oseb, ki trpijo zaradi okvar vida in sluha, do programov; predlaga, da države članice Komisiji vsako leto predstavijo podatke o odstotkih vseh svojih programov, ki ponujajo storitve pomoči invalidnim osebam (tj. podnaslavljanje, zvočni opis in znakovni jezik) na javnih in zasebnih televizijah ter razvijajo nacionalne akcijske načrte za povečanje razpoložljivosti teh storitev in njihov preprostejši dostop do televizijske opreme;
Calls for particular attention to be given to access to programmes for persons with visual or hearing disabilities; proposes that Member States submit data each year to the Commission on the percentage of total programme output carrying services to assist disabled people (i.e. subtitling, audio-description and sign language) on both their public and private channels and develop national action plans to increase the availability of such services and make them easier to access on TV equipment ;
Številčnost in koncentracija
Pluralism and concentration
43. poudarja, zaradi zagotavljanja pluralizma mnenja in raznolikosti pri distribuciji programov, da je treba pri pripravi nacionalnih predpisov ali predpisov Skupnosti o digitalizaciji zagotoviti, da večina novih storitev digitalne distribucije ne postane odvisna od ali pod vplivom velikih skupin multinacionalnih medijev, ki imajo na razpolago pomemben kapital – zlasti tistih, katerih interesi so zunaj Evropske unije;
Stresses that particular care should be paid, in the interest of guaranteeing pluralism of opinion and variety of broadcasting services, to ensuring, when drafting rules on the switch to digital at Community or national level, that the majority of newly opened up digital broadcasting services do not come into the possession or under the determining influence of large, capital-rich, multinational media groups– particularly those with interests outside the EU;
Številčnost temelji na spoštovanju in spodbujanju različnih stališč v vseh medijih, priznavanju neodvisnosti izdajateljev, v javnem in v trgovinskem sektorju, ter na vplivu in neodvisnosti regulativnih organov;
Stresses that competition and competition law are not enough to ensure media pluralism; considers that pluralism is based on respect for and promotion of diversity of points of view in all the media, through the recognition of editorial independence, both in the public and the commercial sectors, and through the authority and independence of the regulatory authorities;
48. poudarja, da so kulturna raznolikost, svoboda in številčnost medijev, ki ostajajo najpomembnejša vsebina evropskega avdiovizualnega modela, tri vrednote, ki so nepogrešljivi pogoji za kulturne izmenjave in demokracijo; meni, da mora zato revidirana Direktiva 89/552/EGS vključiti določila, ki bodo zagotovila in zaščitila svobodo izražanja in številčnost medijev.
Points out that, since the cultural diversity, freedom and pluralism of the media remain the most important elements of the European audiovisual model, these three values are essential prerequisites for cultural exchange and democracy; considers that the revised Directive 89/552/EEC should consequently include provisions to safeguard and protect freedom of expression by and the pluralism of the media;
Uporaba členov 4 in 5 Direktive 89/552/EGS „Televizija brez meja“, spremenjene z Direktivo 97/36/ES, za obdobje 2001–2002
Application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/EEC (the “TV without Frontiers” Directive), as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, for the period 2001-2002
Datum predložitve– A6
Date tabled – A[6]
o Letnem poročilu Evropske centralne banke za leto 2004
on the 2004 Annual Report of the European Central Bank
– ob upoštevanju Letnega poročila Evropske centralne banke za leto 2004,
– having regard to the 2004 Annual Report of the European Central Bank,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2004 o letnem poročilu Evropske centralne banke za leto 2003
– having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2004 on the 2003 Annual Report of the European Central Bank
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. februarja 2005 o položaju evropskega gospodarstva - pripravljalnega poročila o širših smernicah ekonomske politike
– having regard to its resolution of 22 February 2005 on the European economic situation - preparatory report on the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines
– ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča z dne 16. septembra 2004 v zvezi z revizijo operativne učinkovitosti upravljanja Evropske centralne banke za proračunsko leto 2003
– having regard to the report by the Court of Auditors of 16 September 2004 on the audit of the operational efficiency of the management of the European Central Bank for the financial year 2003
UL C 286, 23.11.2004, str.
OJ C 286, 23.11.2004, P. 13. ,
UL L 80, 18.3.2004, str.
OJ L 80, 18.3.2004, p.
33. in 17. junija 2004
33. and of 17 June 2004
UL L 230, 30.6.2004, str.
OJ L 230, 30.6.2004, p.
61. o sprejetju Poslovnika Evropske centralne banke in Razširjenega sveta Evropske centralne banke,
61. adopting the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank and of the General Council of the European Central Bank respectively,
– ob upoštevanju izjave Sveta ECB o poročilu Ekonomsko-finančnega sveta o izboljšanju izvajanja Pakta stabilnosti in rasti z dne 21. marca 2005,
– having regard to the Statement of the ECB Governing Council on the ECOFIN Council's report on Improving the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact of 21 March 2005,
– ob upoštevanju člena 106 in člena 112(1) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 106 and 112(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0203/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0203/2005 ),
A. ker priznava popolno neodvisnost Evropske centralne banke (ECB) in Evropskega sistema centralnih bank (ESCB),
A. whereas acknowledging the full independence of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European System of Central Banks (ESCB),
B. ker je glavni cilj ECB ohranjati stabilnost cen in tudi drugače podpirati splošne ekonomske politike Evropske skupnosti, kot to določa člen 2 Pogodbe,
B. whereas the main objective of the ECB is to maintain price stability, and otherwise to support the general economic policies of the European Community, as defined by Article 2 of the Treaty,