natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C5-0126/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5‑0126/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A6-0004/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0004/2005 ),
UVODNA IZJAVA 3a (novo)
RECITAL 3 A (new)
(3a) Ponovna uporabnost, možnost recikliranja in predelava so pomembni cilji okoljske politike EU, zato vsi zadevni pozdravljajo prispevke direktive 2000/53/ES in te direktive..
(3a) Re-usability, recyclability and recoverability are important EU environment policy objectives, and consequently the contributions of Directive 2000/53/EC and this Directive are welcomed by all concerned.
Okoljske cilje predloga je smiselno izpostaviti v uvodni izjavi.
It seems worthwhile to emphasise the proposal's environmental objectives in the recitals.
ČLEN 4, TOČKA 5
ARTICLE 4, POINT 5
5) "referenčno vozilo" je različica tipa vozila, ki ga homologacijski organ v zvezi z njihovo možnostjo recikliranja, ponovne uporabnosti in predelave označi za najbolj problematičnega;
(5) ‘reference vehicle’ means the version within a type of vehicle, which is identified by the approval authority as being the most problematic in terms of re-usability, recyclability and recoverability;
Ta vozila bo v dogovoru s proizvajalcem izmed različnih verzij v okviru tipa vozila določil homologacijski organ.
These vehicles shall be chosen by the approval authority from amongst the different versions within a type in agreement with the manufacturer.
Upoštevati se morajo naslednja merila:
The following criteria shall be taken into account:
tip karoserije;
the type of bodywork;
razpoložljiva stopnja notranje opreme;
the available trim levels;
razpoložljiva dodatna oprema, ki se doda na odgovornost proizvajalca.
the available optional equipment which can be fitted under the manufacturer’s responsibility;
V skladu s predlogom Komisije (pod 6.2.3.) mora biti jasno, da mora homologacijski organ izbrati vozilo v dogovoru s proizvajalcem in na podlagi predlaganih meril.
In line with the Commission proposal (under 6.2.3.), it should be made clear that vehicles must be chosen by the approval authority in agreement with the manufacturer and on the basis of the proposed criteria.
ČLEN 5, ODSTAVEK 2a (novo)
ARTICLE 5, PARAGRAPH 2 A (new)
Proizvajalci morajo dokazati skladnost z določbami člena 4(2)(a) Direktive 2000/53/ES.
The manufacturer shall demonstrate compliance with the provisions of Article 4(2)(a) of Directive 2000/53/EC.
Direktiva 2000/53/ES po juliju 2003 v vozilih ali njihovih sestavnih delih prepoveduje svinec, živo srebro, kadmij ali šestvalentni krom.
The Directive 2000/53/EC bans lead, mercury, cadmium or hexavalent chromium in vehicles or their components after 1 July 2003.
Če vozilo vsebuje te vsebine, ki presegajo pogoje, določene v direktivi ELV, se homologacija ne dodeli.
Type approval should not be granted if the vehicle contains these substances other than under the conditions specified in the ELV Directive.
ČLEN 5, ODSTAVEK 3
ARTICLE 5, PARAGRAPH 3
Homologacijski organ mora preveriti, da so sestavni deli iz polimerov in elastomerov, ki so v skladu s prilogo I, odstavkom 2 te direktive na seznamu za odpravljanje, označeni v skladu s Sklepom Komisije 2003/138/ES z dne 27. februar 2003, ki na podlagi Direktive 2000/53/ES vzpostavlja standarde kodiranja sestavnih delov in materialov za vozila.
The approval authority shall check that the component parts made of polymers or elastomers included in the dismantling list referred to in Annex I paragraph 2 to this Directive are marked in accordance with Commission Decision 2003/138/EC of 27 February 2003 establishing component and material coding standards for vehicles pursuant to Directive 2000/53/EC.
Homologacijski organ mora preveriti, ali je proizvajalec pravilno označil ustrezne sestavne dele iz polimerov in elastomerov, ki so v skladu s prilogo I, odstavkom 2 te direktive na seznamu za odpravljanje, označeni v skladu s Sklepom Komisije 2003/138/ES z dne 27. februarja 2003, ki na podlagi Direktive 2000/53/ES vzpostavlja standarde kodiranja sestavnih delov in materialov za vozila.
The approval authority shall check whether the manufacturer has taken the requisite steps to ensure that the component parts made of polymers or elastomers included in the dismantling list referred to in Annex I paragraph 2 to this Directive are marked in accordance with Commission Decision 2003/138/EC of 27 February 2003 establishing component and material coding standards for vehicles pursuant to Directive 2000/53/EC.
V praksi se sestavni deli iz polimerov in elastomerov označijo šele v zadnji fazi pred začetkom produkcije, ko se že zaključi postopek homologacije.
In practice, components made of polymers or elastomers are not marked until the final pre‑production phase, when the type-approval process has already been completed.
Uporaba te določbe bi od proizvajalcev zahtevala, da dodajo dodatne prototipe, da bi bili sestavni deli iz polimerov in elastomerov v postopku homologacije označeni.
Applying this provision would require manufacturers to build additional prototypes so that components made of polymers or elastomers are marked when type-approval checks are carried out.
Za obe strani učinkovitejša rešitev bi bila, da homologacijski organi preverijo, če je proizvajalec pravilno označil ustrezne sestavne dele (s čimer prevzame odgovornost).
A more efficient arrangement for both sides would require the type-approval authority to check that the manufacturer has taken the requisite steps (and thus also accepts responsibility) for ensuring that the relevant components are marked.
Seveda pa homologacijski organ lahko naknadno izvaja nadaljnja preverja.
Naturally enough, the type-approval authority may subsequently carry out further checks.
ČLEN 6, ODSTAVEK 3
ARTICLE 6, PARAGRAPH 3
Države članice naj v skladu z odstavkom 2 priloge IV te direktive imenujejo pristojni organ, ki bo izvajal predhodno ocenjevanje in izdal potrdilo o skladnosti.
Member States shall appoint a competent authority, in accordance with paragraph 2 of Annex IV to this Directive, to carry out the preliminary assessment and to issue the certificate of compliance.
Organi za homologacijo v državah članicah že obstajajo.
Type-approval authorities already exist in the Member States.
Zelo pomembno je, da so nacionalni organi, ki so odgovorni za preverjanje skladnosti z določbami te direktive, spoštovani in priznani organi, ki so sposobni oceniti vozilo in njihovo strukturo.
It is of great importance that the national authorities responsible for monitoring compliance with the provisions of this directive are accepted and respected bodies, able to assess vehicles and their construction.
Obstoječi organi za homologacijo to lahko počnejo in zagotavljajo pravno varnost in preprečijo kakršno koli izkrivljanje konkurence v Evropi.
The existing type-approval authorities are in a position to do this and provide legal certainty and prevent any distortion of competition in Europe.
ČLEN 10, ODSTAVEK 3, UVODNI DEL
ARTICLE 10, PARAGRAPH 3, INTRODUCTORY PART
Po [… 36 mesecih od uveljavitve te direktive] naj države članice, v kolikor se zahteve te direktive ne upoštevajo:
With effect from [… 36 months after the entry into force of this Directive] Member States shall, if the requirements of this Directive are not met:
Po [… 54 mesecih od uveljavitve te direktive] naj države članice, v kolikor se zahteve te direktive ne upoštevajo:
With effect from [… 54 months after the entry into force of this Directive] Member States shall, if the requirements of this Directive are not met:
Potreba, da se istočasno izvede homologacija vseh tipov vozil različnih proizvajalcev bo ustvarila administrativna ozka grla in nepremostljive težave tako za homologacijske organe kot za proizvajalce.
The need to approve all types produced by all manufacturers at the same time would give rise to administrative bottlenecks, creating insurmountable problems both for the type-approval authorities and for manufacturers.
Samo v Evropi trenutno obstaja okrog 600 tipov, kar pa onemogoča izvedbo homologacije v 36 mesecih.
In Europe alone some 600 types currently exist, making approval within 36 months an impossibility.
Še več, prednostno izvajanje homologacije za nove tipe bi bilo dosledno z že vzpostavljeno prakso v EU.
Moreover, giving priority to the approval of new types would be consistent with established practice in the EU.
Poleg tega je potrebno razlikovati med novimi in obstoječimi tipi: prednostno izvajanje homologacije novih tipov bo zagotavljalo, da so preverjeni vsi tipi, ki pridejo na trg.
In addition, a distinction should be drawn between new and existing types: if priority is given to the approval of new types, this will ensure that all types which come on to the market have been checked.
Postopek homologacije se obstoječim tipom lahko izvede kasneje.
Existing types can then go through the approval process at a later date.
DODATEK I, TOČKA 4, UVOD
AnNEX I, POINT 4, INTRODUCTION
Glede na tip vozila se izbere eno referenčno vozilo med:
With respect to a vehicle type, one reference vehicle shall be selected within:
Če homologacijski organ in proizvajalec ne bosta skupaj označila najbolj problematične različice tipa vozila v zvezi z njihovo možnostjo recikliranja, ponovne uporabnosti in predelave , se glede na tip vozila izbere eno referenčno vozilo med:
Should the approval authority and the manufacturer fail jointly to identify the most problematic version of a type of vehicle in terms of re-usability, recyclability and recoverability, with respect to a vehicle type, one reference vehicle shall be selected within:
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o o homologaciji motornih vozil glede njihove ponovne uporabnosti, možnosti recikliranja in predelave in o spremembi Direktive Sveta 70/156/EGS
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the type-approval of motor vehicles with regard to their re-usability, recyclability and recoverability and amending Council Directive 70/156/EEC
člena 251(2) in 95 ES
Articles 251(2) and 95 EC
Legal basis disputed Datum mnenja JURI
Legal basis disputed Date of JURI opinion
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejitvah pri trženju in uporabi toluena in triklorobenzena (osemindvajseti predlog spremembe direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene (twenty-eighth amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0320 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0320)
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0030/2004 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0030/2004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A6-0005/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0005/2005 ),
Se ne smeta dati v promet ali uporabljati kot substanca ali sestavina preparatov, če je njuna vsebnost v snovi enaka ali višja od 0,1 % pri vseh vrstah uporabe, razen pri vmesni.'
May not be placed on the market or used as a substance or constituent of preparations in a concentration equal or higher than 0.1 % by mass for all uses except as an intermediate.
Se ne smeta dati v promet ali uporabljati kot substanca ali sestavina preparatov, če je njuna vsebnost v snovi enaka ali
May not be placed on the market or used as a substance or constituent of preparations in a concentration equal or
višja od 0,1 % pri vseh vrstah uporabe, razen pri vmesni in pri izdelavi 1,3,5 - trinitro - 2,4,6 - triaminobenzena (TATB).'
higher than 0.1 % by mass for all uses except as an intermediate and in the manufacture of 1,3,5 - trinitro - 2,4,6 - triaminobenzene (TATB) .
Triklorobenzen se uporablja pri izdelavi 1,3,5 - trinitro - 2,4,6 - triaminobenzena (TATB).
Trichlorobenzene is used in the manufacture of 1,3,5 - trinitro - 2,4,6 - triaminobenzene (TATB).
Triaminobenzen se še posebej uporablja pri izdelavi neobčutljive municije (IM), ki zagotavlja, da municija ne eksplodira v primeru nesreče, na primer pri vžigu goriva.
Triaminobenzene is specifically used in the manufacture of Insensitive Munitions (IM) which ensure that the munitions do not detonate in the event of accidental situations, for example, fuel fires.
Trenutno ni pri izdelavi te municije nobene alternative triaminobenzenu.
At present there is no alternative to triaminobenzene in the manufacture of these munitions.
Politika Severnoatlantskega pakta je, da podpira uporabo IM in se usmerja k njej.
It is the policy of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation to strongly support and move towards IM.
Varnostni standardi municije in državljanov, ki živijo blizu zalog so, brez izjeme, zelo ogroženi.
Without an exemption, safety standards of munitions and for civilians living near stockpiles would be severely compromised.
Cilj te direktive je predstaviti usklajene določbe v zvezi s toluenom in triklorobenzenom (TCB), tako da se v skladu s členom 95 Pogodbe zaščiti notranji trg in hkrati zagotovi visoka raven varovanja zdravja in okolja.
The objective of this Directive is to introduce harmonised provisions with regard to toluene and trichlorobenzene (TCB), thus preserving the internal market whilst ensuring a high level of protection of health and the environment, as required by Article 95 of the Treaty.
Zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja, ki jih povzročata toluen in TCB, so se ocenila v okviru Uredbe (EGS) št. 793/93 o oceni in nadzoru tveganj obstoječih snovi.
The risks to health and the environment posed by toluene and TCB have been assessed under Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances.
Ocene tveganj so pokazale, da je potrebno zmanjšati zdravstvena tveganja, ki jih povzročata toluen in TCB.
The risk assessments identified a need to reduce the risks to health from toluene and TCB.
Glede na dejstvo, da se določena uporaba teh kemikalij ne more nadzirati pod določenimi pogoji, se lahko varnost v smislu zdravja ljudi zagotavlja le z omejevanjem uporabe teh snovi in njihove priprave.
Due to the fact that certain uses of these chemicals cannot be controlled under certain conditions, safety in terms of human health can only be ensured by restricting the use of the substances and preparations concerned.
To še posebej velja za uporabo potrošnikov.
That applies particularly to consumer uses.
Področja uporabe
Areas of use
Toluene se uporablja kot surovina za pripravo benzola in kot ena izmed sestavin drugih kemikalij (npr. benzojeve kisline, nitrotoluenov, tolil-diisocianatov kot tudi barvil, zdravil, dodatkov k hrani, plastike itn.)
Toluene is used as a raw material in the production of benzene and a host of other chemicals (e.g. benzoic acid, nitrotoluenes, tolyl diisocyanates, as well as dyes, pharmaceuticals, food additives, plastics, etc.).
Zaradi svoje topilne moči je toluen lahko prisoten v potrošniških izdelkih, vključno z gospodinjskimi razpršili, barvami, laki in lepili.
Due to its solvent power toluene can be present in consumer products, including household aerosols, paints, varnishes, adhesives and glues.
Toluen je še posebej nevaren ob vdihovanju.
Toluene is particularly dangerous if breathed in.
TCB se v večji meri uporablja kot vmesni produkt v proizvodnji herbicidov in kot topilo v postopku zaprtih sistemov.
TCB is predominantly used as an intermediate in the manufacture of herbicides and as a process solvent in closed systems.
Poleg tega se TCB v manjši meri uporablja kot topilo, nosilec barv in antikorozijsko sredstvo.
In addition, TCB has other minor uses as a solvent, a dye carrier and as a corrosion inhibitor.
Komisija na podlagi ocen tveganj in predlaganih strategij za zmanjšanje tveganja predlaga, da se omeji trženje in uporaba toluena in TCB ter priprave, ki ju vsebujejo.
On the basis of the risk assessments and recommended risk reduction strategies the Commission is proposing that the marketing and use of toluene, TCB, and of preparations containing them, be restricted.
Priporočilo poročevalca
Rapporteur's recommendation
Predlagana direktiva bi za industrijo ali trgovino povzročila manj težav, saj se uporaba toluena in TCB v zadevnih primerih zmanjšuje, podjetja pa so že razvila alternative.
The proposed Directive should pose few problems for the industry or trade, as the use of toluene and TCB is declining in the cases in question, and companies have already developed alternatives.
Predlagana direktiva pomeni pozitiven prispevek k varovanju zdravja ljudi in okolja in to z nizkimi stroški , zato naj se sprejme le z enim predlogom spremembe.
As the proposed Directive would yield benefits in terms of protecting human health and the environment and this should be achieved at little cost, it is proposed that the Directive be adopted with just one amendment.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejitvah pri trženju in uporabi toluena in triklorobenzena (osemindvajseti predlog spremembe direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS)
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene (twenty-eighth amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC)
datum predložen Parlamentu
Date submitted to Parliament
Pristojni odbor datum objave na zasedanju
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary
Okrepljeno sodelovanje datum objave na zasedanju
Enhanced cooperation Date announced in plenary
Mnenje Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora datum sklepa na zasedanju
European Economic and Social Committee consulted Date of decision in plenary
Posvetovanje z Odborom regij datum sklepa na zasedanju
Committee of the Regions consulted Date of decision in plenary
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Norbert Glante, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Jules Maaten, Riitta Myller, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber ,Åsa Westlund
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Norbert Glante, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Jules Maaten, Riitta Myller, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.................................................3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION................................................3
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT....................................................................................4
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................5
- ob upoštevanju zahteve Kolda Gorostiage z dne 7. julija 2004 za zaščito imunitete v zvezi s sodnim postopkom pred francoskim sodiščem, ki je bila na plenarnem zasedanju objavljena 22. julija 2004,
- having regard to the request by Koldo Gorostiaga for defence of his immunity in connection with legal proceedings pending before a French court, of 7 July 2004, announced in plenary sitting on 22 July 2004,
– ob upoštevanju členov 8, 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 ter člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Articles 8, 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, of 8 April 1965, and Article 6(2) of the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, of 20 September 1976,
- ob upoštevanju razsodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 12. maja 1964 in 10. julija 1986
- having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
Glej primer 101/63: Wagner proti Fohrmannu in Krierju [1964] ECR 195 in primer 149/85: Wybot proti Faureju in drugimi [1986] ECR 2391.
See Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. ,
- ob upoštevanju člena 6(3) in člena 7 svojega Poslovnika,
- having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0006/2005 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0006/2005 ),
A. ker je bil Koldo Gorostiaga v Evropski parlament izvoljen na petih neposrednih volitvah, ki so potekale 13. junija 1999, in ker je bila veljavnost njegovega mandata preverjena 15. decembra 1999, njegov mandat pa je potekel 19. julija 2004,
A. whereas Koldo Gorostiaga was elected to the European Parliament in the fifth direct elections held on 13 June 1999, and whereas his credentials were verified on 15 December 1999, and his term of office expired on 19 July 2004,
B. ker se je Koldo Gorostiaga pritožil, da mu je prvostopenjsko sodišče v Parizu odvzelo določeno vsoto denarja in ker trdi, da mu je ta znesek v obliki dodatkov izplačal Parlament,
B. whereas Koldo Gorostiaga complains that a certain amount of his money was seized by the Court of First Instance of Paris and whereas he claims that these monies were allowances paid to him by Parliament,
C. ker Koldo Gorostiaga trdi, da odvzem njegove domnevne lastnine predstavlja kršitev Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah,
C. whereas Koldo Gorostiaga asserts that the seizure of his alleged property constituted a violation of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities,
D. ker Koldo Gorostiaga trdi, da naj bi drugi preiskovalni senat pritožbenega sodišča v Parizu v sodbi z dne 11. junija 2004 odločil, da je "v preiskovalnem postopku", in da to predstavlja kršitev Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah,
D. whereas Koldo Gorostiaga complains that he would have been declared "under examination" by the second investigating Chamber of the Court of Appeals of Paris, in its judgment of 11 June 2004, and that this was a violation of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities,
E. ker na osnovi predloženega dokaznega gradiva Kolda Gorostiage ne ščiti parlamentarna imuniteta v zvezi z zahtevami, ki so bile predstavljene predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta,
E. whereas, on basis of the evidence that he has provided, Koldo Gorostiaga is not protected by Parliamentary immunity in respect of any of the claims which have been drawn to the attention of the President of the European Parliament,
sklene, da ne ščiti imunitete in privilegijev Kolda Gorostiage.
Decides not to defend the immunity and privileges of Koldo Gorostiaga.
Zahteva za zaščito poslanske imunitete in privilegijev g.
Request for the defence of the immunity and privileges of Koldo Gorostiaga
Kolda Gorostiage
Procedure number
člena 6(3) in 7
Rules 6(3) and 7
Klaus Heiner Lehne14.9.2004
Klaus Heiner Lehne 14.9.2004
Prejšnji poročevalec
Previous rapporteur
proti: 0 vzdržani glasovi 0
against: 0 abstentions: 0