natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tega večina držav EU, pa tudi Komisija in Parlament nista mogla sprejeti.
Parliament's role in future budget negotiations, (especially its Lisbon mandated greater involvement in the preparation of the multiannual budget frameworks) was also on the table but discussion of this was firmly rejected by the same few States.
Parlament je v pogajanjih želel tudi večjo vključenost v postopek priprave večletnih finančnih okvirov EU, t.i. finančnih perspektiv, odpreti pa je začel tudi razpravo o prihodnjem financiranju unije, predvsem s ciljem olajšati breme za proračune držav članic.
Equally, Parliament's effort to open consideration or reforming the way the EU budget is financed so as to limit the burden on the member states was also rejected.
Kako naprej?
What now?
Evropska komisija bo v naslednjih tednih pripravila nov osnutek proračuna.
Following Monday's breakdown of the negotiations, the European Commission will have to present, in the coming weeks, a new draft budget.
Svet EU bo imel 30 dni časa, da ga preuči, nato pa ga bo v roke dobil Parlament, ki bo moral svoje mnenje povedati v 42 dneh.
This will in turn be examined by Council within a period of thirty days, and then submitted for approval to Parliament, which has 42 days at its disposal.
Pogajalci Parlamenta pa upajo, da bodo šefi držav in vlad EU na decembrskem vrhu pogajanja spravili z mrtve točke, tako da bo lahko proračun sprejet še pred koncem leta.
However, Parliament's negotiating team has already expressed the hope that the leaders of the member states will break the deadlock at their meeting in December, in time for the budget to be formally approved before year-end.
Kot je dejala poročevalka za proračun, poljska poslanka Sidonia Jędrzejewska (EPP): "Razkorak med tem, kar države od EU pričakujejo, in med tem, kaj so pripravljene za to finančno prispevati, postaja vedno večja."
As EP general budget rapporteur and Polish MEP Sidonia Jędrzejewska (EPP) pointed out after the meeting, "there is a growing discrepancy between what the Member States expect the EU to do and the willingness of the Member States to finance those new tasks".
Proračunski pogajalci Parlamenta pozivajo Evropski svet naj pogajanja premakne z mrtve točke Posnetek tiskovne konference Parlamenta po zastoju pogajanj Tiskovna konferenca Sveta EU in Komisije Prispevek EuroparlTV Za kaj gre pri proračunskih pogajanjih med Parlamentom in Svetom?
Press release EP Press conference following Monday's meeting Press conference, Council and Commission EuroparlTV Budget Q&A
Letni proračun EU je le eden izmed sedmih
The 2011 Budget: going for growth
Trenutni dolgoročni finančni okvir EU je namreč narejen za obdobje sedmih let, od leta 2007 do leta 2013.
Next year is the year the economy could make a decisive step in its recovery and the EU budget is one vital instrument in this path to redemption for post-crisis Europe.
Proračuni, ki jih v tem obdobju vsako leto sprejme EU, se morajo držati smernic, predpisanih za dolgi rok, tako da vseh sedem proračunov skupaj ne preseže odhodkov in prihodkov, ki jih še dovoljuje finančni okvir.
However, the initial budget proposals by the Commission were severely trimmed by the Council of Ministers and now Parliament, following the first vote in the Budgets Committee, is fighting to restore funding to more acceptable levels.
Javne finance EU tako združujejo načrtovanje izdatkov in prihodkov za vsa področja delovanja EU za več let vnaprej, hkrati pa v okviru pogajanj o vsakoletnih proračunih puščajo dovolj prostora zato, da se lahko na letni ravni postavljajo ustrezne prednostne naloge.
Parliament's final position will be voted on by the plenary later this month in view of the final "conciliation" negotiation with the member states.
Kako po letu 2013?
Facts and figures
Z ustanovitvijo odbora za politične izzive je Evropski parlament tudi nakazal, da bo pomembno usmerjal razpravo o prihodnjem dolgoročnem finančnem okviru, ki bo stopil v veljavo po letu 2013.
This is especially measures to help Europe's recovery through research and innovation, help its poorer regions and the EU's presence in the world, including essential support for Palestine.
Koliko denarja bo potrebnega, od kod bo ta denar prišel, za kaj bo porabljen, kako dolg naj bo proračunski okvir - vse to so vprašanja, o katerih se bo Parlament pogajal z državami EU.
In general terms, Parliament insists on the EU being given the means to assume all the new tasks the Treaty of Lisbon requires of it.
Pogodbe o EU določajo, da morajo biti v evropskem proračunu prihodki in izdatki izravnani.
This translates in an increase of 2.2% for the commitments on 2010 and 5,9% for the payments.
Evropski proračun se polni iz več virov, ki jih imenujemo lastni viri.
(The 2007-2013 Long term framework had set commitments at 142.97 billion euros and payments at 134.3 billion.
Nato je tukaj še vir na osnovi davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) .
The European Institutions' budget is also trimmed by 163 million.
Trenutno v EU sicer poteka neformalna razprava o tem, ali bi ne bilo dobro uvesti evropskega davka, ki bi nadomestil vse zgoraj omenjene vire, hkrati pa za državljane EU ne bi predstavljal nič večjega finančnega bremena.
EP Press release on committee vote EC Press release on draft budget Council Press Release
... praznijo pa izdatki
2011: A budget for today and tomorrow
Če pogledamo dolgoročni proračunski okvir EU, potem vidimo, da so izdatki porazdeljeni med šest glavnih politik, torej šest poglavij, od katerih je vsako razdeljeno na še manjše dele.
Why has the EP insisted in restoring the spending, what are its red lines in the negotiations with the Council that are expected to follow next week's vote and how should the budget be financed in the future?
Z Lizbonsko pogodbo o njih popolnoma enakopravno odločata Evropski parlament in Svet EU, kjer so zbrane članice unije.
Mr Lamassoure, the Budgets Committee has voted to restore most of the cuts made to the 2011 draft budget by the Council of ministers.
Prvi razgovori o proračunu za naslednje leto se začno že takoj na začetku leta, v njih pa sodelujejo Parlament, Svet EU in Komisija.
The governments cite the need for economies in Brussels as in the national capitals so where does the EP stand on this?
Ko ima enkrat Parlament na mizi predlog proračuna Sveta EU, lahko odbori povedo svoje mnenje.
We are at European level are in the same difficulties, the same dilemmas as at the national level.
V njem se srečata dve delegaciji z istim številom članov: na eni strani so evropski poslanci, ki predstavljajo Parlament, na drugi strani predstavniki držav EU, ki predstavljajo Svet EU.
Each State is trying to find a good balance between these two concerns, which may seem a bit contradictory.
Proračun EU 2011 naj bo usmerjen v rast
I think the main red line is not on the 2011 budget.
Proračun v številkah.
The economic recovery is being felt in 2010.
Leto 2011 bo za gospodarstvo Evropske unije odločilno, saj se bo takrat pokazalo, ali je EU sposobna narediti preskok iz krize v rast.
We hope that it will consolidate itself in 2011.
Proračun EU lahko k temu preobratu pomembno prispeva, vendar le v primeru, če bo imel dovolj sredstev za spodbujanje ključnih evropskih politik.
I think in 2012 we will be able to truly begin to fund new policies set by the Lisbon Treaty; energy, the fight against greenhouse gases, funding new industries or completely new policies like immigration.
Države EU so osnutek proračuna, ki ga je predlagala Evropska komisija, močno skrčile, evropski poslanci pa sedaj želijo to popraviti.
These are policies where we need resources.
Na današnjem zasedanju odbora za proračun je tako Evropski parlament po več sejah, ki so potekale ves teden, glasoval zato, da se obseg sredstev proračuna določi pri vsoti, ki jo je predlagala Evropska komisija.
In addition, we expect the Council to see the impasse we are today to finance the EU budget.
Ta je 3,5 milijarde višja od tega, kolikor predlaga Svet EU.
The contributors are national budgets that are ruined.
143.65 milijarde evrov v zavezah (t.j. denar, ki je na voljo za dejavnosti, ki se bodo začele naslednje leto, vendar se ne bodo istega leta tudi nujno končale) in 130.14 milijarde evrov v plačilih (t.j. denar, ki bo v letu 2011 v resnici odtekel iz proračuna), kar znaša 1.06 odstotka (BNP) unije.
For us it is an application that is obviously very strong because as we will not have our own resources, the EU budget will remain capped at a level that is much too low compared to the skills and ambitions of the European Union.
Tukaj gre predvsem za raziskave in razvoj, pomoč manj razvitim regijam EU ter evropsko zunanjo politiko, kamor spada tudi pomoč Palestincem.
Will governments be able to accept this?
Države EU bi varčevale
Not at the moment.
Svet EU želi za zaveze v letu 2011 nameniti 141.77 milijarde evrov, za plačila pa 126.5 milijarde, kar je 3.5 milijarde manj, kot je predlagala Komisija.
But thinking has not yet begun, it is really just beginning.
Velja omeniti, da dolgoročni proračunski okvir za obdobje 2007-2013 za leto 2011 dovoljuje zaveze v višini 142.97 milijard evrov in plačila v višini 134.3 milijarde evrov.
I hope they will accept it by the end of the year.
Lamassoure: Proračun za leto 2011 gleda v prihodnost
2011 budget: The EP position
Države EU so prvotni predlog proračuna, ki ga predlaga Evropska komisija, oklestile, odbor Parlamenta za proračun pa je v svojem predlogu predvidene izdatke znova približal željam Komisije.
Budget 2011 A more restrictive 2011 budget which will, however, allow the EU to overcome the crisis through investment in research, education and "green" energy, while safeguarding future spending, was voted by MEP on Wednesday 20 October.
S predsednikom odbora, francoskim poslancem Alainom Lamassourom (EPP), smo se pogovarjali o tem, kaj to pomeni za proračunska pogajanja.
With the vote, the stage is set for the tough negotiations with the Council leading to the final vote in the November plenary.
Gospod Lamassoure, odbor za proračun je proračunske reze, ki so jih v svojem predlogu predvideli finančni ministri držav članic, zavrnil.
Recognising the budgetary constraints faced by most member states, Parliament voted on Wednesday 20 October for just a 0,8% increase in commitments compared to 2010.
Parlament vztraja pri stališču, da je evropski proračun v bistvu proračun za gospodarske ukrepe, katerih cilj je pripraviti se na prihodnost in povečati prihodke ter na ta način spodbuditi povpraševanje in podpreti gospodarsko okrevanje.
In Tuesday's debate, Budgets committee chairman, Alain Lamassoure , said that the EP fully understands the cost-cutting imperative and has acted accordingly in its position on the budget.
Vemo, da države EU, ki financirajo evropski proračun, to leto sredstev, ki jih namenjajo za evropske politike, v bistvu niso povečale.
In all Parliament voted for funding of approximately 130.56 billion euros in payments and 143.07 billion in commitments, or 1.14% of EU GNI, in line with what the Commission had originally proposed but still lower than originally envisaged by the 2007-2013 long term financial framework.
V letu 2010 smo začutili gospodarsko okrevanje, pričakujemo, da se bo to naslednje leto krepilo, v letu 2012 pa bi že lahko začeli financirati dejavnosti, ki jih predvideva Lizbonska pogodba: na področju energije, boja proti podnebnim spremembam, novih industrij in vesoljske tehnologije, pa tudi na povsem novem področju, namreč politiki priseljevanja.
In major departures from the Council's position, the EP increased funding for lifelong learning, innovation and "intelligent" energy, the Baltic Sea strategy, restored funding for agriculture, youth, sport and programmes against domestic violence, as well as assistance to the Palestinians.
To so politike, za katere potrebujemo sredstva.
Provision was also made for the stability mechanism to aid Greece, should this become necessary in the future.
Prišel je trenutek, ko moramo razmisliti o novih sredstvih, ki bi lahko polnila evropski proračun, ne da bi se pri tem še bolj obremenjevalo nacionalne proračune.
As far as the longer term budget is concerned, MEPs insisted on the need for greater flexibility and asked for both the "proper" involvement of Parliament in discussions for the next multiannual financial framework and a profound rethinking of the revenue side of the budget ("own resources").
To je naša zelo močna zahteva.
Commitments and payments
Če ne bomo imeli lastnih sredstev, potem bo evropski proračun ostal omejen na ravni, ki ne ustreza pristojnostim in ambicijam Evropske unije.
Commitments: The maximum amounts available for all actions and programmes scheduled to start during the year.
Ali bodo vlade to lahko sprejele?
May be disbursed over several years
Pričakujem, da bodo do konca leta vlade to sprejele.
They may flow from commitments included in previous years' budgets
Poslanec Alain Lamassoure (EPP, FR) Odbor za proračun sprejel predlog proračuna EU za leto 2011 (tiskovno sporočilo)
Press Release
Sidonia Jędrzejewska: Pomisleke držav v zvezi s proračunom EU razumemo
Sidonia Jędrzejewska: "we are not blind to the concerns of the member states"
O tem, kako pogajanja potekajo, smo se pogovarjali s poljsko poslanko Sidonio Jędrzejewsko (EPP), ki je v Parlamentu odgovorna za sprejemanje proračuna za naslednje leto.
Centre right Polish MEP Sidonia Jędrzejewska is has been guiding Parliament through the process and agreed to answer our questions.
Predlogi Parlamenta o izdatkih evropskega proračuna so znotraj okvirov večletnega finančnega okvira EU, v bistvu se skladajo s številkami, ki si jih želi videti Evropska komisija.
Parliament's budget figures are well within the multiannual framework and in line with Commission proposals, but have been attacked as excessive at a time when there are cuts in many member states.
Kljub temu pa predloge Parlamenta napadajo, češ da so v času proračunskih rezov v državah članicah apetiti poslancev preveliki.
What is the real difference with what the Council proposed and why was it necessary?
Prav imate, stališče Parlamenta je v okviru večletnega finančnega okvira.
Indeed the European Parliament's position adopted last week is within the limits set by the multiannual financial framework.
To je vredno poudariti, saj gre za novo dejstvo.
This is worth underlining because it is new.
Zame kot poročevalko je zelo pomembno, da ostanemo znotraj okvira, saj to kaže, da je Parlament odgovoren partner v pogajanjih: poslušamo, kaj skrbi Svet EU, nismo slepi za pomisleke držav članic.
For me as the general rapporteur it was very important to stay within the limits of the framework because it shows that the EP is a responsible actor in the process: we do listen to the concerns of the Council and we are not blind to the concerns of the member states.
K prvotnim številkam Komisije se vračamo zaradi dveh razlogov.
So why we propose to come back more or less to the European Commission's proposal?
Če jih ne bomo spoštovali, bo to ogrozilo programe.
Not to respect them puts ongoing programmes at risk.
Drugi razlog je ta, da Lizbonska pogodba nalaga EU več dela.
The second thing is that many political events have taken place over the last years.
Pričakovati, da lahko EU naredi veliko več z enako količino denarja, ni samo nepravično, je nemogoče.
In my view, to expect that the EU can do much more for the same money is not just unfair, it is impossible.
EU je pod velikim pritiskom, da uvede vesoljsko politiko, vzpostavi evropsko diplomacijo, začne izvajati aktivnosti v zvezi s strategijo EU2020, pri čemer za to nimamo sredstev.
The EU is under enormous pressure to implement space policy, to introduce European diplomacy, to meet its commitments linked to the EU 2020 strategy and we just don’t have resources for this.
To, kar je predlagal Svet EU avgusta, je v bistvu proračunski rez v času, ko v resnici potrebujemo več denarja.
What the Council proposed in August is a de facto cut, when we need more.
Iskreno rečeno, Svet se bo moral odpovedati nekaterim svojim prioritetam ali pa se strinjati s skromnim povečanjem sredstev.
To be honest, the Council should either drop some of its priorities or be willing to go for an increase, which is by the way only a small one.
Proračun EU se velikokrat primerja z nacionalnimi proračuni, ampak so te primerjave realistične, glede na to, kakšne so naloge evropskega proračuna?
The EU budget is usually compared to national budgets but is the comparison realistic, given the EU budget's mission and composition?
Gre za dve popolnoma različni stvari.
They are totally different things.
Proračun ima zelo posebne značilnosti.
The EU budget has very particular features.
Ne more ustvariti primanjkljaja, ne more se financirati z zadolževanjem.
It is a budget that cannot generate a deficit and cannot be financed by debt.
Usmerjen je v vlaganja, ne v socialne storitve.
It is also investment oriented.
Gre torej za financiranje infrastrukture, znanja, raziskav - proračun je sam po sebi ukrep proti krizi.
It focuses not on social welfare, but on investment: hard infrastructure, soft infrastructure, knowledge, research.
Kako odgovarjate tistim, ki menijo, da bi lastni viri proračuna EU zmanjšali vpliv držav in učinkovitost demokratičnega nadzora?
How do you respond to those who claim that this will reduce government influence and thus democratic oversight of the budget?
Menim, da je docela nerealistično pričakovati, da lahko v tem času pridemo do dogovora o tako spornem vprašanju.
We have two months ahead of us and it is completely unrealistic to believe we can get to any conclusions on so controversial an issue.
Lahko se pogovarjamo o tem, kako bi moral biti proračun financiran v prihodnje, kako zmanjšati pritiske na proračune držav članic in kako narediti proračun EU bolj pregleden.
We should be able to talk about financing of the budget for the future: how to lessen the burden to the member states and make the budget more accountable to citizens.
Sama nisem navdušena nad tem, da povezujemo dogovor o novih virih financiranja z dogovorom o proračunu za naslednje leto.
Myself, I am not a fan of linking the debate on new financing mechanisms and the debate on the 2011 budget.
Pri slednjem moramo biti pragmatični in stvar zaključiti.
On 2011 we need pragmatism and goodwill to conclude.
Predlagali smo vrsto dopolnil pri izdatkih, s čimer smo sporočili vladam, da od EU pričakujejo vedno več aktivnosti, hkrati pa za slednje ne želijo dati več denarja.
We have a number of amendments on the expenditure side that are a signal to the member states that they are giving more and more tasks to the EU but are unwilling to shift money to the EU level to implement those tasks.
To je težava, s katero se moramo spopasti, gre za obliko politične dvoličnosti.
I think this is a political problem we have to tackle, a form of political hypocrisy.
Pogajanja med Parlamentom in Svetom prehajajo v zaključno fazo.
The final phase, conciliation between the Parliament and Council, is about to begin.
Se bojite, da bi prišlo do zastoja?
Do you fear deadlock in the negotiations?
Sama sem zelo pragmatična, moja naloga je pragmatična naloga.
I am a very pragmatic person my task is a pragmatic task.
Menim, da smo podali dober predlog.
I think we actually presented a reasonable proposal.
Ne moreš se pogajati, če ne poskusiš razumeti svojega partnerja, torej moramo poskusiti razumeti stališča Sveta.
You cannot negotiate if you don’t try to understand your partner, so we have to understand the Council.
Ampak če ta ne bo dal več, potem mora pozabiti na jedrsko fuzijo v okviru projekta ITER in na okrepljeno zunanjo politiko EU.
But if the Council is completely unwilling to give more, it has to forget about some of its dreams like the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) or foreign policy.
Upam, da bomo zaključili do konca leta, odgovorni smo zato, da vzpostavimo normalno financiranje EU od 1. januarja naprej.
I hope we can conclude by the end of the year because it is our common responsibility to have proper financing from 1 January next year.
Igre med institucijami ne bi nikoli smele biti bolj pomembne od programov.
These inter-institutional tensions and games should never be more important than the beneficiaries, the programmes.
Poslanka Sidonia Elżbieta Jedrzejewska Poslanci potrdili proračun EU za leto 2011, vendar zahtevajo pogajanja o financiranju v prihodnosti
When the "financial framework" is set, it includes the maximum amount to be spent by the EU, as well as how this is broken down year by year and subject by subject, although the exact amount for the annual budget is the subject of annual negotiations.
Evropski parlament s svojim predlogom proračuna EU za leto 2011
In all, every year the EU spends on behalf of the citizens almost exactly 1% of the EU Gross National Income (GNI) or about €130 billion.
Kako EU sprejema proračun.
This translates into about €235 from each EU citizen per year.
Poslanci priznavajo, da je treba v času gospodarske krize omejiti želje glede obsega proračuna Evropske unije za leto 2011, vseeno pa poudarjajo, da je treba zagotoviti dovolj denarja za tista vlaganja, ki spodbujajo gospodarsko rast.
Whatever the final decision, one thing is certain: like every budget, it is and will be divided into revenue and expenditure, with all money effectively flowing from the member states to the EU and then flowing back from the EU to member states and citizens.
Sedaj se lahko trda proračunska pogajanja z državami EU nadaljujejo, dokončen dogovor pa je pričakovati novembra.
The "VAT resource" is a proportion of VAT revenue collected by the Member States, representing 11% of the EU budget revenue.
Ker je gospodarski položaj težaven, poslanci v 2011 predlagajo zvišanje izdatkov v obliki zavez za 0,8 odstotka v primerjavi z letošnjim letom.
The "GNI resource" is an annual direct contribution by each member state according to its wealth, as measured by its GNI.
Pri tem so poslanci zavrnili razporeditev izdatkov, kot jih je predlagal Svet EU, kjer sedijo finančni ministri 27 članic unije.
It accounts for 75% of all EU revenue and there are various fine tuning mechanisms, such as the UK rebate, which returns to the UK a percentage of what it has contributed to the budget.
Več nalog, enako denarja
A review of these revenues is being discussed, though not yet formally negotiated.
Predsednik odbora Parlamenta za proračun Alain Lamassoure (EPP, FR) je ob tem dejal, da se Parlament zaveda potrebe po varčevanju, kar se odraža tudi v izglasovanem predlogu.
One proposal is to replace some or all of these resources by an EU-wide tax that would ensure adequate financing for the budget without any additional cost to the taxpayer.
Se je pa vprašal, ali je res razumno pričakovati, da bo EU vse nove dejavnosti in politike, ki so ji jih naložile vlade z Lizbonsko pogodbo, izvajala brez enega dodatnega evra.
One major difference between the EU budget and national budgets is that revenue and expenditure must match.
To je blizu predloga proračuna, ki ga je podala Evropska komisija, kar je pa vseeno manj, kot dovoljuje dolgoročni proračunski okvir za obdobje 2007-2013.
The 2007-2013 framework includes six main "headings" for spending, subdivided into innumerable budget "items", each covering specific expenditure authorised by specific legislation, and into "commitments" and the slightly lower "payments", the money actually disbursed.
Kakšne so prednostne naloge?
... following tough negotiations
Za kohezijsko politiko, torej pomoč regijam EU, ki v razvoju zaostajajo, bi parlament dal 42.6 milijarde evrov, 58.6 milijarde bi šlo za skupno kmetijsko politiko EU, 7.65 milijarde za zunanje politike, 848 milijonov za varnost in notranje zadeve, vključno s politiko priseljevanja, 649 milijonov za projekte državljanstva EU ter 8.2 milijardi evrov za administrativne stroške.
After the multiannual framework is set, the exact amounts to be spent every year by the EU are decided in, often, tough negotiations between Parliament and Council, a process set out in detail by the EU Treaties and an inter-institutional agreement between Parliament, Council and Commission.