natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
O. ker je institucija varuha človekovih pravic leta 2005 praznovala deseto obletnico in ker je želel varuh človekovih pravic ob tej priložnosti z različnimi sporočili povečati ozaveščenost državljank in državljanov o tem, kako lahko uveljavljajo svoje pravice in kako poiščejo pomoč pri varuhu človekovih pravic,
O. whereas in 2005, the institution of the Ombudsman marked its tenth anniversary; and whereas the Ombudsman’s communication activities on the occasion of that anniversary had the objective of raising citizens' awareness of their rights and of how to exercise those rights and of the terms of reference of the Ombudsman,
2. meni, da je varuh človekovih pravic znova uspešno izpolnil svoje cilje, npr. izboljšanje učinkovitosti svoje institucije v zvezi s spodbujanjem dobrega upravljanja in spoštovanja pravne države in človekovih pravic;
Considers that the Ombudsman has continued successfully to pursue the objectives of enhancing the effectiveness of his institution towards promoting good administration and the respect for the rule of law and human rights;
4. bi pozdravil racionalizacijo parlamentarnega postopka, s čimer bi v prihodnje zagotovili hitrejšo obravnavo letnega poročila varuha človekovih pravic v Odboru za peticije;
Would welcome a tightening up of internal parliamentary procedures in order to guarantee in future swifter processing of the Ombudsman's annual report by the Committee on Petitions;
9. pozdravlja nadaljnjo zagotovitev pomoči pritožnikom tudi v primerih, v katerih ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti nepravilnosti, pri čemer je bila obenem izrabljena priložnost za izboljšanje kakovosti upravnega postopka;
Welcomes the fact that, even in cases where no maladministration could be ascertained, the complainants were provided with assistance and the inquiry was at the same time used as an opportunity to improve the quality of administration;
11. pozdravlja splošno konstruktivno sodelovanje varuha človekovih pravic z institucijami in organi Skupnosti ter potrjuje njegovo vlogo zunanjega nadzornega mehanizma kot tudi dragocenega vira za nenehno izboljševanje evropske uprave;
Welcomes the generally constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the Community institutions and bodies and endorses him in his role of external control mechanism and, in addition, as a valuable source of ongoing improvement to European administration;
13. meni, da je treba čim prej ustrezno spremeniti status varuha človekovih pravic z dne 9. marca 1994, kar je že zahteval Odbor za peticije v zadnjem poročilu o letnem poročilu varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2004; pozdravlja dejstvo, da je varuh človekovih pravic predsedniku Parlamenta dne 11. julija 2006 predložil obširen predlog v zvezi s tovrstno spremembo;
Is convinced that the necessary adaptation of the Ombudsman’s Statute of 9 March 1994, as already called for in the Committee on Petitions’ last report on the Ombudsman's annual report for 2004, should be carried out as soon as possible; and welcomes the Ombudsman's submission to the President of Parliament of a substantive proposal for such adaptation on 11 July 2006;
17. pozdravlja posebno poročilo glede odprtja sej Sveta za javnost, kadar slednji nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca, ter poziva Svet, naj upošteva omenjeno resolucijo z dne 4. aprila 2006 in v prihodnje pri izvrševanju svoje zakonodajne funkcije vedno zaseda odprtih vrat in dostopno javnosti;
Welcomes the special report on the openness of meetings of the Council when acting in its legislative capacity and calls on the Council to comply with its resolution of 4 April 2006 and, in future, for all the meetings in which it acts in its legislative capacity to be open and accessible to the public;
20. pozdravlja uvedbo novega notranjega postopka znotraj Komisije, ki je v večini primerov zadolžena za pripravo odgovorov na preiskave varuha človekovih pravic, v zvezi s katerimi se posamezni komisarji povežejo in sodelujejo pri določenem primeru, ter poziva Komisijo, naj ta postopek uporabi tudi pri obravnavi peticij;
Welcomes the introduction of new internal procedures at the Commission as the main body concerned with answering inquiries from the Ombudsman, whereby individual Commissioners assume sponsorship for a specific case, and calls on the Commission to introduce this kind of procedure for the processing of petitions as well;
25. priznava prizadevanja varuha človekovih pravic za večjo ozaveščenost državljank in državljanov o njihovih pravicah glede vložitve pritožbe pri varuhu človekovih pravic; vendar ga zaradi visokega števila pritožb, ki niso v njegovi pristojnosti, poziva, naj okrepi svoja prizadevanja, da bi pogosteje in obsežneje poročal o svojih pristojnostih;
Acknowledges the efforts of the Ombudsman to enhance the citizens’ awareness of their rights to lodge a complaint with the Ombudsman; however, urges him in the light of the large number of complaints falling outside his terms of reference to intensify his efforts to provide an increasing amount of information about those terms of reference on a more regular basis;
27. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in poročilo Odbora za peticije posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter njihovim varuhom človekovih pravic ali ustreznim organom.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of the Committee on Petitions to the Council, the Commission, the European Ombudsman, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and their ombudsmen or similar competent bodies.
Urad Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic je leta 2005 praznoval svojo deseto obletnico.
In 2005 the Office of the European Ombudsman celebrated its tenth anniversary.
Urad se je vse od ustanovitve z Maastrichtsko pogodbo nenehno razvijal, kar je navzven razvidno iz števila prejetih pritožb kot tudi iz števila zaposlenih in spremenjene sestave urada.
Since its establishment by the Maastricht Treaty the office has developed continuously as is reflected outwardly both in the number of complaints received and in the number of staff and the changes to the office's structure.
Kot piše varuh človekovih pravic v uvodu k 11. letnemu poročilu za Evropski parlament, nas pritožbe opozarjajo na resne in temeljne probleme.
As the Ombudsman writes in the introduction to the 11th annual report to Parliament, complaints are often a symptom of a more serious fundamental problem.
V tem oziru so prizadevanja za opredelitev problemov in njihovo rešitev pomemben prispevek k delovanju EU, ki bo kar najbližje državljanom.
In this sense, the efforts to identify the problems and offer solutions are an important contribution towards creating an EU administration that is as close to the citizens as possible.
Poročilo ponuja dober pregled nad delovanjem Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v preteklem letu.
The report provides a good overview of the European Ombudsman’s activities over the last year.
V njem so nazorno in na podlagi konkretnih primerov predstavljeni rezultati posameznih preiskav po kategorijah in vrstah domnevnih nepravilnosti ali po zadevnih institucijah.
The various inquiry findings are presented clearly using examples and are broken down by categories such as nature of alleged maladministration or institution concerned.
V prilogi so sicer navedene dejanske številke in odstotki, vendar mešanje številk in odstotkov v glavnem delu povzroča zmedo.
While it is true that the annex does list both absolute figures and percentages, it is at times somewhat confusing to see a mixture of absolute figures and percentages in the main section of the report.
Vendar pri tem ni jasno, zakaj je predsednik Evropskega parlamenta omenjeno poročilo uradno prejel že marca, medtem ko ga je Odbor za peticije kot pristojni odbor prejel šele skoraj dva meseca po tem.
It also seems difficult to understand why the report was officially submitted to the President of the European Parliament back in March but was not presented in the Committee on Petitions as the specialist committee responsible until almost two months later.
Obravnavane pritožbe
Complaints investigated
V letu 2005 je bilo vloženih 3920 pritožb, kar je največ doslej in kar hkrati kaže na to, da je delovanje varuha človekovih pravic čedalje bolj znano in priznano.
The fact that 2005 saw the largest number of petitions submitted so far with a figure of 3920 makes it clear that the services of the Ombudsman are being increasingly recognised and/or used.
Iz rezultatov zaključenih preiskav lahko ugotovimo, da v 114 primerih (tj.
The findings of the completed inquiries show that, in 114 cases (corresponding to 36% of complaints investigated), no maladministration could be ascertained.
36 % obravnavanih pritožb) ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti nepravilnosti, kar pa ne pomeni, da so bile takšne pritožbe neutemeljene ali vložene brez razloga.
This does not mean that the complaint was groundless or to no avail.
Državljani so kljub temu prejeli odgovor, obrazložitev ali opravičilo, če zadeva ni bila obravnavana na najboljši način, tudi če uradno ni bilo mogoče dokazati nepravilnosti delovanja.
Instead, the citizens do receive an answer, explanation or even an apology when a matter has not been dealt with ideally, even though in purely formal terms no evidence could be produced of poor administrative practice.
Za državljane je to hkrati tudi dokaz, da so bile njihove skrbi upoštevane.
At the same time, this is confirmation of the fact that their concerns are taken seriously.
Pri tem je razveseljivo, da je bilo možno v 89 primerih (27 %) zadevni problem posameznih pritožb, naslovljenih na varuha človekovih pravic, rešiti prek zadevne institucije.
It is good to note that, in 89 cases, (27.9%) the problem raised could be resolved by the institution concerned following a complaint to the Ombudsman.
To kaže na to, kako pomembno je, da se pri vsaki preiskavi hkrati prizadeva za izboljšanje upravnega postopka, na primer z dodano pripombo, naslovljeno na zadevno institucijo; kot v primeru urada EPSO, od katerega je varuh človekovih pravic zahteval, naj v prihodnjih javnih razpisih vnaprej jasno določi, da povabilo na predizbor še ne pomeni dopustnosti posameznega kandidata.
This illustrates how important it is that each inquiry is at the same time used as an opportunity to improve the quality of administration for the future - e.g. by means of a critical remark addressed to the institution concerned as, for example, in the case of EPSO which was admonished by the Ombudsman that in future notices of competition it should be clarified from the outset that an invitation to attend the preselection tests does not automatically imply that the candidate is eligible.
Na splošno pozdravljamo uspeh varuha človekovih pravic, ki je pritožnikom pomagal naprej v 75 % primerov, bodisi z uvedbo preiskave, s posredovanjem pritožbe pristojnemu organu ali pa z informacijo, na katerem mestu lahko hitro in učinkovito najdejo rešitev zadevnega primera.
It is generally to be welcomed that in 2005 the Ombudsman was able to assist over 75% of complainants either by instituting an enquiry, by forwarding the matter to the relevant body and/or indicating where a swift and effective solution was available in the case in question.
Pri tem pa je zelo pomemben še naslednji podatek: skoraj 70 % vloženih pritožb je še vedno izven pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic.
Yet another figure also sends a clear message: almost 70% of all complaints received still fall outside the Ombudsman’s terms of reference.
Ta podatek kaže na to, da sta za veliko državljanov razdelitev pristojnosti in način sprejemanja odločitev med oblastmi na evropski, nacionalni in regionalni ravni očitno še vedno nepregledna.
This figure shows that the demarcation of responsibilities and decision-making procedures between the European, national and regional levels are plainly still too hand to grasp for many citizens.
Varuh človekovih pravic sicer pravi, da je glavni izziv to, da veliko državljanov sploh ne ve, kaj počneta evropski varuh človekovih pravic in Evropska unija.
The Ombudsman himself does mention as main challenges the fact that, firstly, many people do not know what the European Ombudsman does and, secondly, what the EU does.
To bi tudi v očeh evropskih državljanov povečalo legitimnost uprave EU.
This would enhance the legitimacy of the EU administration in the eyes of citizens.
Preglednost in odprtost Unije do njenih državljanov
Transparency and proximity to citizens
Pri skoraj četrtini pritožb (24 %), ki so bile obravnavane v časovnem okviru poročila, je bilo opozorjeno na pomanjkanje preglednosti (vključno s pomanjkanjem informacij).
In almost a quarter of all complaints investigated during the reporting period (24%) lack of transparency (including refusal of information) was criticised.
Na tem področju je očitno treba še veliko stvari izboljšati.
Plainly, a great deal therefore still needs to be done in this area.
V tem poročilu varuh Svet poziva, naj zaseda javno vsakič, ko opravlja svojo zakonodajno funkcijo.
The special report called on the Council to meet in public whenever acting in its legislative capacity.
V resoluciji z dne 4. aprila 2006 k temu poročilu Parlament jasno poziva, naj bodo zasedanja Sveta ministrov, ko ta deluje v svoji zakonodajni funkciji, »odprta in dostopna za javnost«.
In its resolution of 4 April 2006 on this report Parliament clearly stated its position that meetings of the Council at which the latter is acting in its legislative capacity are 'open and accessible to the public'.
Evropski parlament »meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da najpomembnejši zakonodajni organ EU še vedno zaseda za zaprtimi vrati, ko deluje v svoji zakonodajni funkciji«, kar onemogoča predvsem, da bi se državljani udeležili teh zasedanj.
Parliament 'considers it unacceptable that the EU's most important law-making body still meets behind closed doors when acting as legislator’, since this first and foremost curtails severely the scope for public participation.
Nenazadnje gre pri tem tudi za to, da se okrepi zaupanje državljanov v EU, njihove predstavnike in delovanje ter da se poglobi javna razprava o Evropi in povezava državljanov z EU in njenimi institucijami.
Lastly, it is about boosting the confidence of the population in the EU, its representatives and practices and about enhancing the public debate on Europe as well as the proximity of the citizens to the EU and its bodies.
Da bo zagotovljena večja preglednost in s tem povezanost državljanov z EU, varuh človekovih pravic predlaga naslednje:
In order to achieve greater transparency and hence proximity to the citizens, the rapporteur also submits the following proposals:
Prisotnost predsedstva Sveta na spletu tudi v nemškem jeziku
Internet site of Council Presidencies in German as well
Da bi olajšali dostopnost državljanom in podjetjem do informacij, je treba upoštevati tudi spremembe sedanje jezikovne ureditve v EU.
In the efforts to facilitate the accessibility of information for citizens and businesses, changes in the current language regime of the EU must also be taken into account.
Danes že vsak tretji državljan EU govori nemško
It is now the case that every third EU citizen speaks German
Doslej so bile spletne strani šestmesečnih predsedstev običajno na voljo zgolj v angleščini, francoščini in v jeziku predsedujoče države.
Hitherto, however, the six-monthly rotating Council Presidencies have usually made their Internet site available only in English, French and the language of the country holding the presidency at the time.
Pri tem pa se ne upošteva dejstva, da je nemščina z 18 % daleč najbolj razširjen materni jezik v Uniji in nenazadnje po širitvi drugi najbolj razširjeni govorjeni jezik v EU (32 %) za angleščino (51 %).
This takes no account of the fact that German (with 18%) is the most widespread mother-tongue in the EU and not least in the wake of enlargement is, after English (with 51%), the most widespread language overall among EU citizens (32%).
Pregledno spletišče vseh institucij EU
Easy-to-use Internet portal for all EU institutions
Da bi se izboljšala jasnost in s tem zagotovljena odprtost Unije do njenih državljanov poročevalec poziva, naj se oblikuje enostavno in pregledno spletišče za vse institucije EU.
In the interests of greater clarity in general and hence of greater proximity to the citizen, the rapporteur calls for a simple and easy-to-use common Internet portal for all EU institutions.
Sicer je prek spletišča
It is true that it is already possible at the present time to reach all institutions via the portal
www.europa.eu omogočen dostop do vseh institucij, vendar le posredno.
www.europa.eu but only by circuitous routes.
Struktura EU na prvi pogled ni razvidna, pri čemer številni vzporedno obstoječi spletni naslovi pogosto povzročajo še večjo zmešnjavo.
The structure of the European Union is not plain to see at first sight and the many Internet addresses existing alongside one another are more likely to lead to even greater confusion.
Zato poročevalec predlaga enostavno vstopno stran za vse ustanove EU s petimi povezavami: na Evropski parlament, Evropsko komisijo in Svet ministrov ter s povezavo na stran s podatki o sestavi EU in povezavo do ostalih institucij.
The rapporteur accordingly proposes a simple entry page for the entire EU with five menu items: one link each to the European Parliament, the Commission and the Council as well as one page with information about the structure of the EU and a reference link to the other institutions.
Sodelovanje z institucijami in organi EU
Cooperation with EU bodies
Konstruktivno sodelovanje varuha človekovih pravic z institucijami in organi EU (v obliki srečanj, prireditev in seminarjev) je pomembno za nenehno izboljševanje evropske uprave.
The constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the EU institutions and bodies (in the form of meetings, events and seminars) is a valuable source of ongoing improvement to European administration.
Evropski parlament podpira vlogo varuha človekovih pravic kot zunanjega nadzornega organa za učinkovito upravljanje in pozdravlja prve uspehe tega sodelovanja, kot je uporaba novega notranjega postopka znotraj Evropske komisije, pri čemer so nekateri komisarji prevzeli odgovornost za posamezne pritožbe.
Parliament endorses the Ombudsman in his role of external control mechanism for sound administration and welcomes some successes that have already resulted from this collaboration, e.g. application of the new internal procedure at the Commission whereby individual Commissioners assume responsibility for the relevant complaints.
Takšen postopek bi bil koristen tudi pri obravnavanju peticij, zato se Komisijo poziva, naj ustrezno razširi področje uporabe postopka.
Such a procedure would also make sense for the processing of petitions and the Commission is accordingly urged to extend its scope accordingly.
Poleg tega je treba jasno opredeliti in razmejiti vlogo Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic ter vlogo Odbora za peticije EP.
Furthermore, the role of the European Ombudsman must be clearly defined and demarcated from the role of Parliament's Committee on Petitions.
Medtem ko je Odbor za peticije pokazatelj splošnega delovanja, pravilnega izvajanja in uporabe zakonodaje EU v državah članicah, se mora varuh človekovih pravic jasno in nedvoumno omejiti na vlogo zunanjega nadzornega organa za boljše upravljanje institucij in organov EU.
Whilst the Committee on Petitions is an indicator for the general functioning and proper transposition and application of EU legislation in the Member States, the Ombudsman must confine himself clearly and unambiguously to his role of external control mechanism for sound administration by EU institutions and bodies.
V nasprotnem primeru so lahko državljani po nepotrebnem zmedeni.
Otherwise, unnecessary confusion may be created for citizens.
Sodelovanje z institucijami in organi na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni
Cooperation with bodies at national, regional and local levels
Evropska mreža varuhov človekovih pravic je koristna za izmenjavo najboljših praks med organi, ki se na različnih ravneh ukvarjajo z enakimi problemi in izzivi.
The European Network of Ombudsmen is a very useful arrangement for exchanging best practice between bodies confronted with the same problems and challenges at different levels.
Evropski parlament se zavzema za nadaljnje poglabljanje teh izmenjav in zlasti pozdravlja posebni pisni postopek, po katerem nacionalni ali regionalni varuhi človekovih pravic prejmejo pisni odgovor prek evropskega varuha človekovih pravic na vprašanja glede zakonodaje EU in njene razlage.
Parliament encourages further strengthening of this exchange and, in particular, welcomes the special written procedure whereby the national or regional ombudsmen receive written answers to questions of EU law and its interpretation via the European Ombudsman.
Navsezadnje so organi v državah članicah glavni odgovorni za prenos zakonodaje EU v njihovo nacionalno zakonodajo.
In the final analysis, it is after all the administrations of the Member States who bear the main responsibility for the transposition of EU law into national law.
Glede na to, da je skoraj 70 % prejetih pritožb še vedno izven pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic, je treba ponovno premisliti o strategiji obveščanja.
The fact that close on 70% of complaints still fall outside of terms of reference of the Ombudsman should prompt a rethink of communication strategy.
Ker v vseh državah članicah ne obstaja varuh človekovih pravic, se veliko ljudi obrne na Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, če imajo težave z nacionalnimi, regionalnimi ali lokalnimi ustanovami (to je razlog za 93,7 % prejetih pritožb, ki ne spadajo v pristojnost varuha človekovih pravic).
Precisely because an ombudsman does not exist in all Member States, many people are turning to the European Ombudsman when they encounter problems with a national, regional or local administration (93.7% of complaints outside the Ombudsman's terms of reference are attributable to this cause!).
Da bi se zmanjšalo nenehno veliko število pritožb, ki niso v pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic, slednji ne sme samo splošno spodbujati pritožb, temveč pojasniti, kaj lahko stori in česa ne ter jasno predstaviti in omejiti svoje pristojnosti.
In order to reduce the persistently high number of complaints that do not fall within his terms of reference, the Ombudsman should not therefore simply give general encouragement to the lodging of complaints but instead clarify what he can and cannot do and provide a clear presentation and demarcation of his responsibilities.
Ena možnost bi bila, da sam nameni več pozornosti dogodkom, namenjenim državljanom in s tem tudi potencialnim pritožnikom, ter se ne omeji le na izmenjavo med varuhi človekovih pravic.
One possibility would be for him to place greater emphasis himself on events for citizens and hence potential complainants and not confine himself solely to an exchange between ombudsmen.
Letno poročilo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2005
Annual report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2005
Nadomeščeni/-a poročevalec-ka
Previous rapporteur(s))
o strateškem partnerstvu med EU in Južno Afriko
on an EU-South Africa Strategic Partnership
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 28. junija 2006 z naslovom "Strateškemu partnerstvu EU - Južna Afrika naproti" ( KOM(2006)0347 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 28 June 2006 entitled 'Towards an EU-South Africa Strategic Partnership' ( COM(2006)0347 ),