natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za zavajajočo opustitev se šteje tudi, če trgovec prikriva na nejasen, nerazumljiv, dvoumen način ali ob nepravem času navede bistvene informacije iz odstavka 1 ali ne opredeli komercialnega namena poslovne prakse, če ta ni razviden iz konteksta.
It shall also be regarded as a misleading omission when a trader hides or provides in an unclear, unintelligible, ambiguous or untimely manner such material information as referred to in paragraph 1 or fails to identify the commercial intent of the commercial practice if not already apparent from the context.
Za zavajajočo opustitev se šteje tudi, če trgovec prikriva na nejasen, nerazumljiv, dvoumen način ali ob nepravem času navede bistvene informacije iz odstavka 1 , ob upoštevanju zadev iz navedenega odstavka, ali ne opredeli komercialnega namena poslovne prakse, če ta ni razviden iz konteksta in kjer, v obeh primerih, to povzroči ali bi utegnilo povzročiti, da povprečni potrošnik sprejme odločitev o poslu, ki je drugače ne bi sprejel .
It shall also be regarded as a misleading omission when a trader , taking into account the matters described in paragraph 1, hides or provides in an unclear, unintelligible, ambiguous or untimely manner such material information as referred to in that paragraph or fails to identify the commercial intent of the commercial practice if not already apparent from the context and where, in either case, this causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision that he would not have taken otherwise .
Z opredelitvijo testa o odločitvi o poslu se zagotovi večja pravna varnost.
Legal certainty is improved by specifying the transactional decision test.
ČLEN 10, ODSTAVEK 1 A (novo)
ARTICLE 10, PARAGRAPH 1 A (new)
Zatekanje k takim nadzornim organom se ne bo štelo za ustreznico zgornjim sredstvom sodne ali upravne pritožbe, kot je določeno v členu 11 te direktive.
Recourse to such control bodies shall never be deemed the equivalent of foregoing a means of judicial or administrative appeal as provided for in Article 11.
Zatekanje k takim pravilom vedenja je izbirno in ne more nadomestiti sredstev sodne ali upravne pritožbe, kot je določeno v členu 11 Direktive.
Recourse to codes of conduct is optional and cannot replace the means of judicial and administrative appeal provided for in Article 11 of the Directive.
ČLEN 11, ODSTAVEK 1
ARTICLE 11, PARAGRAPH 1
Države članice zagotovijo primerna in učinkovita sredstva za boj proti nepoštenim poslovnim praksam in za skladnost z določbami te direktive v interesu potrošnikov.
Member States shall ensure that adequate and effective means exist to combat unfair commercial practices and for compliance with the provisions of this Directive in the interest of consumers.
Države članice uvedejo primerna in učinkovita sredstva za boj proti nepoštenim poslovnim praksam za uveljavljanje skladnosti z določbami te direktive v interesu potrošnikov.
Member States shall ensure that adequate and effective means exist to combat unfair commercial practices in order to enforce compliance with the provisions of this Directive in the interest of consumers.
ČLEN 18, ODSTAVEK 1
ARTICLE 18, PARAGRAPH 1
Poročilo se po potrebi priloži predlog za revizijo te direktive ali drugih ustreznih delov zakonodaje Skupnosti.
The report shall be accompanied, if necessary, by a proposal to revise this Directive or other relevant parts of Community law.
Člen 3(9) o finančnih storitvah bi bilo treba vključiti v pregled Komisije, da bi se spodbudilo nadaljnje usklajevanje na tem področju.
Article 3 (9) in relation to financial services, should be included in the Commission’s review with a view to encouraging further harmonisation in this field.
Ob času pregleda morajo biti države članice sposobne oblikovati utemeljene sodbe o tem, ali naj so finančne storitve še naprej predmet dodatnih nacionalnih predpisov.
By the time of the review, Member States should be capable of making a more informed judgement on whether financial services should continue to be subject to additional rules at national level.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 4
ANNEX I, POINT 4
(4) Trditi, da je bil izdelek potrjen, odobren ali dovoljen s strani javnega ali zasebnega organa, čeprav to ni res, ali to zatrjevati brez upoštevanja pogojev potrditve, odobritve ali dovoljenja.
(4) Claiming that a product has been approved, endorsed or authorised by a public or private body when it has not or making such a claim without complying with the terms of the approval, endorsement or authorisation.
(4) Trditi, da je bil trgovec (vključno z njegovimi poslovnimi praksami) ali izdelek potrjen, odobren ali dovoljen s strani javnega ali zasebnega organa, čeprav to ni res, ali to zatrjevati brez upoštevanja pogojev potrditve, odobritve ali dovoljenja.
(4) Claiming that a trader (including his commercial practices) or a product has been approved, endorsed or authorised by a public or private body when he/ it has not or making such a claim without complying with the terms of the approval, endorsement or authorisation.
Obstoječi odstavek 4 Priloge prepoveduje predstavljanje lažne odobritve izdelka, vendar ne pokriva primera, ko trgovec lažno zatrjuje, da je povezan z dobro znanim podjetjem ali vladnim organom, ne da bi dejansko povezoval izdelek z odobritvijo.
Paragraph 4 of the Annex currently prohibits claiming false product endorsement but does not cover the scenario where a trader falsely claims to be affiliated with a well-known business, or government department without actually linking the product to the endorsement.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 7
ANNEX I, POINT 7
(7) Lažno zatrjevati, da bo izdelek na voljo samo za omejeno obdobje, z namenom potrošnika napeljati k takojšnji odločitvi in ga prikrajšati za možnost ali čas, da bi sprejel odločitev ob poznavanju vseh pomembnih dejstev.
(7) Falsely stating that the product will only be available for a very limited time in order to elicit an immediate decision and deprive consumers of sufficient opportunity or time to make an informed choice.
(7) Lažno zatrjevati, da bo izdelek na voljo samo za omejeno obdobje ali da bo na voljo pod posebnimi pogoji samo za omejeno obdobje , z namenom potrošnika napeljati k takojšnji odločitvi in ga prikrajšati za možnost ali čas, da bi sprejel odločitev ob poznavanju vseh pomembnih dejstev.
(7) Falsely stating that the product will only be available for a very limited time , or that it will only be available on particular terms for a very limited time, in order to elicit an immediate decision and deprive consumers of sufficient opportunity or time to make an informed choice.
Ta predlog spremembe je v skladu z duhom predloga spremembe 75 Evropskega parlamenta na prvi obravnavi.
This amendment is in keeping with the spirit of the European Parliament’s amendment 75 at first reading.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 12A (novo)
ANNEX I, POINT 12A (new)
12a) Oglaševanje izdelka, ki je podoben izdelku drugega proizvajalca v taki meri, da zavede potrošnika v prepričanje, da je izdelek proizvedel ta proizvajalec, čeprav temu ni tako.
(12a) Promoting a product similar to a product made by a particular manufacturer in such a manner as deliberately to mislead the consumer into believing that the product is made by that same manufacturer when it is not.
V členu 6(2) Komisija priznava, da lahko pri potrošnikih pride do zmede med izdelki.
In Article 6(2) the Commission recognises that there may be consumer confusion between products.
Obstaja potreba po pojasnjevanju tega v dodatku.
There is a need for further clarification of this in the annex.
Medtem ko imajo podjetja pravico proizvajati cenejše alternative za vsak izdelek, morajo tudi potrošniki imeti največje možno varstvo zoper 'zavajanje'.
Whilst companies have the right to produce cheaper alternatives to any product, consumers too must have the strongest possible protection against 'passing off'.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 20A (novo)
ANNEX I, POINT 20A (new)
(20a) Lažno zatrjevati ali dajati vtis, da trgovec ne deluje za namene v zvezi z njegovo trgovsko, poslovno, obrtno ali poklicno dejavnostjo, ali se predstavljati za kupca.
(20a) Falsely claiming or creating the impression that the trader is not acting for purposes relating to his trade, business, craft or profession, or falsely representing oneself as a consumer.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 20B (novo)
ANNEX I, POINT 20B (new)
20b) Dajati lažni vtis, da so poprodajne storitve za izdelek na voljo v drugi državi članici kot v tisti, v kateri se izdelek prodaja.
(20b) Creating the false impression that after-sales service in relation to a product is available in a Member State other than the one in which the product is sold.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 24
ANNEX I, POINT 24
(24) Zahtevati, da potrošnik, ki želi vložiti odškodninski zahtevek iz zavarovalne police, predloži dokumente, ki se ne morejo utemeljeno šteti za pomembne pri določanju veljavnosti zahtevka, z namenom potrošnika odvrniti od uveljavljanja njegovih pogodbenih pravic.
(24) Requiring a consumer who wishes to claim on an insurance policy to produce documents which could not reasonably be considered relevant as to whether the claim was valid, in order to dissuade the consumer from exercising his contractual rights.
(24) Zahtevati, da potrošnik, ki želi vložiti odškodninski zahtevek iz zavarovalne police, predloži dokumente, ki se ne morejo utemeljeno šteti za pomembne pri določanju veljavnosti zahtevka, sistematično ne odgovarjati na pomembna pisma ali poskušati, na te ali katere koli druge načine, potrošnika odvrniti od uveljavljanja njegovih pogodbenih pravic.
(24) Requiring a consumer who wishes to claim on an insurance policy to produce documents which could not reasonably be considered relevant as to whether the claim was valid, or failing systematically to respond to pertinent correspondence, in order to dissuade the consumer from exercising his contractual rights.
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 25
ANNEX I, POINT 25
25) Vključevanje neposrednega poziva otrokom v oglasu, da za nakup oglaševanega izdelka prepričajo svoje starše ali druge odrasle.
(25) Including in an advertisement a direct appeal to children to persuade their parents or other adults to buy advertised products for them.
Ta določba je brez škode za člen 16 Direktive 89/552/ESG.
This provision is without prejudice to Article 16 of Directive 89/552/EEC.
25) Vključevanje neposrednega spodbujanja otrok v oglasu, da kupijo ali v nakup oglaševanega izdelka prepričajo starše ali drugi odrasle.
(25) Including in an advertisement a direct exhortation to children to buy or to persuade their parents or other adults to buy advertised products for them.
Ta določba je brez škode za člen 16 Direktive 89/552/ESG o televizijskem oddajanju .
This provision is without prejudice to Article 16 of Directive 89/552/EEC on television broadcasting .
PRILOGA I, TOČKA 28
ANNEX I, POINT 28
(28) Ustvariti vtis , da je potrošnik tudi brez nakupa že dobil nagrado, čeprav je možnost dobiti ali podeliti nagrado odvisna od nakupa izdelka s strani potrošnika.
(28) Creating the impression that the consumer has already won a prize without needing to make a purchase when in fact the opportunity to win the prize or the award of the prize are dependent on the consumer buying a product.
-ni nobene nagrade ali ugodnosti
- there is no prize or other equivalent benefit, or
- ali je možnost ukrepanja v zvezi z zahtevanjem nagrade ali druge ugodnosti predmet plačila potrošnika, nastanka stroška ali nekega dejanja, zaradi katerega nastane strošek.
- taking any action in relation to claiming the prize or other equivalent benefit is subject to the consumer paying money or incurring a cost.
Predlog za direktivo o nepoštenem poslovnem ravnanju s potrošniki na notranjem trgu, ki ga je spremenil Parlament na svoji prvi obravnavi 20. aprila 2004, nadaljuje smernico Zelene knjige o varstvu potrošnikov
The proposal for a directive on unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market, amended by Parliament at first reading on 20 April 2004, continues the line of the green paper on consumer protection
3 , pri čemer predlaga splošno prepoved nepoštenega poslovnega ravnanja in v dodatku še indikativen nepopoln seznam splošnih in posebnih primerov nepoštenega poslovnega ravnanja, da bi olajšali razlaganje s strani nacionalne jurisdikcije.
3 , proposing a general ban on unfair commercial practices and, in the annex, an indicative, non-exhaustive list of general and specific examples of unfair commercial practices, with a view to facilitating interpretation by national jurisdictions.
Poročevalka odobrava pristop in cilje prvotnega predloga Komisije za direktivo o nepoštenem poslovnem ravnanju
Your rapporteur endorses the approach and objectives of the Commission's initial proposal for a directive on unfair commercial practices,
4 , zlasti njegov glavni cilj, namreč doseganje višje ravni varstva potrošnikov in nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga na način, ki spodbuja trgovinske posle in s tem gospodarsko rast.
4 notably its key aim, namely to achieve a high degree of consumer protection coupled with the smooth functioning of the internal market in such a way as to favour commercial transactions and, therefore, economic growth.
Poleg tega meni, da izvirno besedilo, ki po eni strani temelji na zadostni harmonizaciji varstva potrošnikov in po drugi strani na načelu izvorne države in vzajemnem priznavanju nacionalne zakonodaje, predstavlja ustrezno uravnovešen predlog za direktivo.
Furthermore, the original text, with its basis in sufficient harmonisation of consumer protection as well as application of the country-of-origin principle and mutual recognition of national legislation, implied a properly balanced proposal for a directive.
Pozdravlja tudi, da je Parlament na prvi obravnavi predstavil predloge sprememb, katerih cilj je nadaljnje izboljšanje ravnovesja predloga in dodal določbe dodatnega varstva potrošnikov.
It is also to be welcomed that Parliament, at first reading, introduced amendments aimed at further improving the balance of the proposal, adding supplementary consumer protection provisions.
V zvezi s tem je Parlament v prvi vrsti predlagal razširitev pravne podlage, in sicer z vključitvijo člena 153 Pogodbe (varstvo potrošnikov) k členu 95 (notranji trg), ki ga je predlagala Komisija, da bi pospešili uresničitev cilja zadostne harmonizacije za popolno varstvo potrošnikov.
In this connection, Parliament in the first place proposed extending the legal basis, inserting Article 153 of the Treaty (consumer protection) alongside Article 95 (internal market) as proposed by the Commission, with a view to furthering the objective of sufficient harmonisation in the interests of full consumer protection.
Da bi omogočil bolj lažjo uvedbo direktive, je Parlament za države članice predstavil možnost, da za obdobje petih let od začetka veljavnosti direktive, obdržijo strožjo nacionalno zakonodajo varstva potrošnikov, sprejeto v okviru zgodnejših direktiv na minimalnih ravneh harmonizacije.
To allow the directive to be phased in more smoothly, Parliament introduced the option for Member States of retaining, for a period of five years from the directive's entry into force, stricter national consumer protection legislation adopted under earlier directives on minimum harmonisation levels.
Poleg tega petletnega odstopanja je Parlament za ustrezno izvajanje predvidel obveznost Komisije, da Parlamentu poroča o uporabi direktive in vsakih pet let predlaga posodobitev Priloge 1 (seznam o prepovedanem nepoštenem poslovnem ravnanju).
To that five-year derogation Parliament added, with a view to proper implementation, an obligation on the Commission to report to Parliament on the application of the directive and to propose, every five years, the updating of Annex I (the list of unfair commercial practices outlawed).
Nadaljnji predlogi sprememb Parlamenta iz prve obravnave so se nanašali na: vstavljanje definicije izpostavljenih potrošnikov, kodekse ravnanja in udeležbo potrošnikov pri sestavljanju le-teh, obvezujočo naravo kodeksov ravnanja strokovnjakov in potrebno upoštevanje sredstev komunikacije, ki jih uporabljajo strokovnjaki pri ocenjevanju nepoštenega poslovnega ravnanja.
Further amendments by Parliament at first reading concerned: insertion of definitions of vulnerable consumers; codes of conduct and consumer participation in their drawing-up; the binding nature of codes of conduct on professionals; and the need to take account of the means of communication used by professionals when evaluating unfair commercial practices.
Skupno stališče Sveta in druga obravnava Parlamenta
The Council's common position and Parliament's second reading
V svojem preučevanju skupnega stališča se je poročevalka odločila, da se osredotoči predvsem na predloge sprememb Parlamenta iz prve obravnave in se tako izogne ponovnemu odprtju razprave o točkah, ki so že bile obravnavane v predhodnih razpravah ali nepotrebnemu podaljšanju časa, namenjenega preučevanju predloga.
In her examination of the common position, your rapporteur has decided in the first place to base herself solely on Parliament's amendments at first reading, so as to avoid reopening the debate on points already settled in the initial discussions or unnecessarily prolonging the time devoted to examining the proposal.
Glede načela izvorne države (člen 4(1) izvornega predloga Komisije) je poročevalka mnenja, da ga vpričo sedaj dosežene ravni harmonizacije varstva potrošnikov več ni potrebno vključiti.
On the country-of-origin principle (Article 4(1) of the original Commission proposal), your rapporteur believes it is no longer necessary to include it, in view of the level of harmonisation of consumer protection now achieved.
Skupno stališče je vključilo veliko predlogov sprememb Parlamenta, zlasti tiste, ki so povezani z definicijo izpostavljenih potrošnikov, pojmom zavezujoče obveznosti, udeležbo združenj potrošnikov pri sestavljanju kodeksov ravnanja in vključitvijo definicije nedovoljenega vplivanja in grožnje nasilja v agresivno ravnanje.
The common position has incorporated many of Parliament's amendments, notably those relating to the definition of vulnerable consumers, the notion of a binding commitment, the participation of consumers' associations in the drawing-up of codes of conduct, and the inclusion among aggressive practices of undue influence and the threat of physical force.
Svet je vključil tudi predlog Parlamenta glede odstopanja, ki dovoljuje uporabo strožje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov.
The Council has also included Parliament's proposal regarding a derogation to permit the application of stricter consumer protection legislation.
Časovno obdobje za to odstopanje je podaljšano na šest let.
The time-period for this derogation is extended to six years.
Sprejeta je tudi obveznost Komisije, da Parlamentu poroča o izvajanju direktive in če bo potrebno, predlaga posodobitev.
Also accepted is the obligation on the Commission to report to Parliament on the implementation of the directive and to propose updates when necessary.
Poročevalka zato meni, da skupno stališče predstavlja zadovoljiv kompromis, čeprav se zaveda, da je treba določene predloge sprememb iz prve obravnave, namenjene krepitvi varstva potrošnikov, ponovno uvesti.
Your rapporteur therefore believes that the common position represents a satisfactory compromise, while also being aware that certain of the amendments from first reading aimed at boosting consumer protection need to be reintroduced.
Predlogi sprememb, ki jih je predlagala poročevalka za drugo obravnavo
The amendments proposed by the rapporteur for second reading
Cilj poročevalke v predloženih predlogih sprememb je bil ponovno predlagati točke o varstvu potrošnikov, povezane z naslednjim: močno omejenimi poprodajnimi garancijami, umetno visokimi referenčnimi cenami in pravico do zamenjave ali nadomestila.
Your rapporteur's aim in the amendments tabled has been to re-propose points on consumer protection relating to the following: severely restricted after-sales guarantees; artificially high reference prices; and the right to exchange or compensation.
Zadnji predlog spremembe, ki zadeva varstvo mladoletnikov, ni namenjen prepovedi oglaševanja za otroke, ampak poostritvi prepovedi poslovnih praks, ki bi lahko otroke postavile pod prevelik pritisk, in ki je že vključena v skupno stališče.
The final amendment, which concerns the protection of minors, is not aimed at outlawing advertising aimed at children but at tightening the ban, already included in the common position, on commercial practices which could put children under undue pressure.
Poročevalka meni, da je ob upoštevanju manjših predlaganih sprememb potrebno direktivo sprejeti nemudoma, saj bo za potrošnike in strokovnjake v EU označevala prvi korak naprej k bolj varnemu pravnemu okviru in popolnejšemu varstvu pravic, določenih v Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
In conclusion, your rapporteur considers that, subject to the small changes proposed, it is necessary to adopt this directive without delay, since it will mark, for both consumers and professionals in the EU, a step forward in terms of a more secure legal framework and the fuller protection of the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union.
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o nepoštenem poslovnem ravnanju s potrošnikom na notranjem trgu in spremembi Direktive Sveta 84/450/EGS in Direktiv Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/7/ES, 98/27/ES in 2002/65/ES ter Uredbe št..../2004 (ES) Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ('Direktiva o nepoštenem poslovnem ravnanju')
the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC and European Parliament and Council Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC and European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No /2004 ('Unfair commercial practices directive')
Datum prve obravnave Parlamenta– P5
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P5
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o stališču Evropske skupnosti o osnutku Uredbe Ekonomske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo o homologaciji ogrevalnih sistemov in motornih vozil glede na njihove ogrevalne sisteme
on the proposal for a Council decision on the position of the European Community in relation to the draft Regulation of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe with regard to the type-approval of a heating system and of a vehicle with regard to its heating system
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2004)0450
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0450
Še neobjavljeno v UL. - 15634/2004),
Not yet published in OJ. - 15634/2004),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Sveta za privolitev v skladu s členom 4(2), druga alinea Sklepa Sveta 97/836/ES z dne 27. novembra 1997
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 4(2), second indent of Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997
UL L 346, 17.12.1997, str.
OJ 346 L, 17.12.1997, p.
– ob upoštevanju členov 75(1) in 43(1) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 75(1) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6‑0028/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0028/2005 ),
Predlogu sklepa Sveta o stališču Evropske skupnosti o osnutku Uredbe Ekonomske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo o homologaciji ogrevalnih sistemov in motornih vozil glede na njihove ogrevalne sisteme
Proposal for a Council decision on the position of the European Community in relation to the draft Regulation of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe with regard to the type-approval of a heating system and of a vehicle with regard to its heating system
člena 75(1) in 43
Rules 75(1) and 43
Datum prošnje za privolitev EP
Date of consulting Parliament
o spodbujanju zdravja in varnosti na delovnem mestu
on promoting health and safety at the workplace
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVICE ŽENSK IN POLITIKO ENAKIH MOŽNOSTI..............15
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY...16