natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
12. pozdravlja ustanovitev skupine komisarjev za „temeljne pravice, protidiskriminacijo in enako obravnavanje“; poziva Komisijo in zlasti komisarje, odgovorne za temeljne pravice, da izdelajo izčrpno in usklajeno strategijo za zagotavljanje spoštovanja temeljnih pravic na vseh področjih politike Unije;
12.Welcomes the establishment of a Group of Commissioners on "Fundamental Rights, anti-discrimination and equal treatment"; calls on the Commission and especially the Commissioners responsible for fundamental rights to work out a comprehensive and coherent strategy to ensure that fundamental rights are observed in all areas of Union policy;
14. poudarja, da države članice in ustanove Unije uživajo posebno pravico do vložitve tožb pred sodišče v korist zakona, in zavzema stališče, da mora Parlament z uporabo tega načina zagovarjati pravice državljanov v primerih, v katerih akt Unije morebiti vpliva na temeljne pravice;
Points out that the Member States and the Union institutions enjoy a special right to bring actions before the Court in the interests of the law and takes the view that Parliament should, using that means, defend the rights of citizens in cases where fundamental rights might be affected by a Union act;
Sodelovanje z nacionalnimi ustanovami za človekove pravice in nacionalnimi parlamenti
Cooperation with national human rights institutions and national parliaments
20. meni, da mora biti Komisija pozorna na stalne in ponavljajoče se kršitve človekovih pravic (zlasti državljanskih pravic, kot sta aktivna in pasivna pravica do sodelovanja na volitvah), ki se dogajajo v nekaterih državah Unije in so bile predmet poročil komisarja za človekove pravice pri Svetu Evrope, g.
Considers that the Commission should pay attention to the repeated and continuous violations of human rights - in particular civil rights such as the active and passive right to participate in election processes - committed in some countries of the Union, which were the subject of reports by the Human Rights Commissioner of the Council of Europe, Mr Alvaro Gil-Robles;
22. predlaga pripravo osnutka medinstitucionalnega kodeksa ravnanja za večjo skladnost in pravičnost zunanjih ukrepov Unije na področju demokratizacije in človekovih pravic – korak, ki ga je s svojo resolucijo z dne 25. aprila 2002 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o spodbujanju človekovih pravic in demokratizaciji v tretjih državah
22..Proposes the drafting of an interinstitutional code of conduct, designed to confer greater coherence and fairness on the Union’s external action in the field of democratisation and human rights – a step already approved in its resolution of 25 April 2002 on the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the European Union's role in promoting human rights and democratisation in third countries
1 Sprejeta besedila, P5_TA(2002)0368 . ; verjame, da bi moral kodeks urejati odnose med Unijo in več kot 120 državami, za katere zdaj velja klavzula demokratičnosti kot ključni element kakršnega koli sporazuma, ki jih zavezuje;
Texts Adopted, P5_TA(2002)0204 . ; believes that the Code should govern relations between the Union and the more than 120 countries to which the democratic clause is currently applicable, as an essential element of all kinds of agreements which bind them;
24. opozarja na pomembno vlogo različnih spremljevalnih mehanizmov Sveta Evrope in ustanov na področju človekovih pravic; poziva institucije EU in Agencijo, da gradijo na tej izkušnji in upoštevajo te mehanizme z namenom njihove vključitve v postopek za delovanje v mreži in da uporabljajo standarde, ki jih je razvil Svet Evrope, in druge pomembne rezultate njegovega dela; trdno vztraja, da to sodelovanje ne sme povzročiti padca standardov EU;
Recalls the significant role of the various Council of Europe monitoring mechanisms and institutions in the human rights field; urges the EU institutions and the Agency to build on this experience, taking account of these mechanisms to incorporate them into a procedure for working in a network, and to make use of the standards developed by the Council of Europe and the other substantive results of its work; is adamant that this cooperation should not lead to any decline in EU standards;
25. verjame, da je treba izdelati delujoč model sodelovanja in da morajo obstajati konkretni predlogi v nadaljnjem zakonodajnem predlogu Komisije v zvezi z Agencijo, vključno z jasnimi opredelitvami pristojnosti Agencije in različnih drugih agencij ter z institucializirano povezavo med Svetom Evrope in prihodnjo Agencijo za temeljne pravice, namen obeh je preprečevati podvajanja in preskrbeti Agenciji vse potrebne podatke;
25.Believes that a functional model of cooperation should be worked out and that there should be concrete proposals in the Commission's forthcoming legislative proposal on the Agency, including clear definitions of the competences of the Agency and of the various other agencies and an institutionalised link between the Council of Europe and the future Agency on Fundamental Rights, both to avoid duplication and to give the Agency all necessary input and to ensure its effectiveness;
27. zavzema stališče, da mora imeti Agencija močna pooblastila in pristojnosti, ki ji omogočajo spremljanje razvoja izvajanja Listine o temeljnih pravicah v Evropski uniji in v državah pristopnicah, poudarja, da mora biti Agencija v stanju zajeti tudi tretje države, če so vpletene v vprašanja o človekovih pravicah, ki zadevajo Unijo, na primer v primerih domnevne kršitve klavzule demokratičnosti;
Takes the view that the Agency must have a strong mandate and the power to follow the development of the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights within the European Union and accession countries; stresses that the Agency should also be able to cover third countries when they are involved in human rights issues affecting the Union, for example in cases where there are suspected violations of the democracy clause;
29. po njegovem mnenju je nujno, da se v vsakem pogledu Agencija obravnava kot popolnoma neodvisna; zato poudarja, da mora imeti dovolj osebja in proračunskih sredstev, ki ji omogočajo izpolniti ambiciozne naloge in pooblastila, ter visoko kakovostno, strokovno usposobljeno osebje z brezhibno integriteto in osebno verodostojnostjo;
Considers it essential for the Agency to be seen as fully independent in every respect; emphasises, therefore, that it should have sufficient staff and budgetary resources to allow it to fulfil its ambitious mandate and should be staffed with high-quality personnel with scientific expertise, unimpeachable integrity and personal credibility;
1 Glej še posebej odstavke:
See, in particular, paragraphs:
11 - presoja vplivov vsake zakonodajne in strateške pobude EU po vzoru pristopa k presoji vplivov, ki ga je Komisija sprejela 27. aprila 2005;
11 - impact evaluation of every legislative and strategic EU initiative taking as model the approach on impact evaluation adopted by the Commission on April 27 2005;
13 - spodbujanje dialoga in sodelovanja med vrhovnimi sodišči;
13 - promotion of dialogue and cooperation between supreme courts;
16, 18 in 19: podpora za organe za temeljne pravice in "odbore za enako obravnavanje", določene z Direktivo 2000/43/ES, v zvezi z zbiranjem podatkov;
16, 18 and 19: support for Member State Institutes for fundamental rights and "equality" commissions established under Directive 2000/43/EC, in so far as data collection is concerned;
17: ustanovitev stalnega foruma z nacionalnimi parlamenti za obravnavo vprašanj temeljnih pravic in razvoja EU v območje svobode, varnosti in pravice;
17: establishment of a permanent forum with national parliaments on fundamental rights issues and establishment of the EU as an area of freedom, security and justice;
23: financiranje študije o zunanjih dejavnikih, ki bi lahko vplivali na politike EU v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami, in morebitna svetovalna vloga Agencije za temeljne pravice;
23: financing a study on the external factors which could affect EU policies as regards human rights and the possible consultative role to be played by a European Fundamental rights Agency;
24 in 25: strukturirano operativno sodelovanje in sinergija s Svetom Evrope;
24 and 25: structured operational cooperation and synergy with the Council of Europe;
49: strategija informiranja in komuniciranja institucij EU, če politike EU vplivajo na temeljne pravice;
49: EU Institutions' information and communication strategy in so far as EU policies affect fundamental rights;
26, 27, 28, 32, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50: kot možna referenca za prihodnje naloge in pristojnosti Agencije;
26, 27, 28, 32, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50: as a possible reference for the future Agency's tasks and mandate;
32. v zvezi s tem meni, da lahko prav zakon, ki določa nalogo zbiranja podatkov, tvori pravno podlago za ustanovitev Agencije za temeljne pravice, katere naloga je dopolnilna nalogam institucij na področjih, ki jih obravnava ta resolucija; v skladu s tem se mora s kvalificirano večino uporabiti postopek soodločanja, ki vključuje Parlament in Svet;
Takes the view, in that connection, that the very act which defines the task of collecting information may constitute the legal basis for establishing the Fundamental Rights Agency, whose task is subsidiary to that of the institutions in the areas dealt with in this resolution; accordingly, the codecision procedure involving Parliament, and with the Council acting by a qualified majority, should apply;
35. meni, da mora biti Agencija oblikovana kot večplastna struktura („omrežje omrežij“), specializiran organ s horizontalnimi pristojnostmi, v katerem imeti mora vsaka plast svojo vlogo in prispevati k razvoju kulture na področju temeljnih pravic v Uniji; meni, da mora Agencija zbrati vse ustrezne podatke, analize in izkušnje, ki so na voljo pri evropskih in nacionalnih ustanovah, nacionalnih parlamentih, vladah in organih na področju človekovih pravic, vrhovnih/ustavnih sodiščih, in obstoječih omrežjih, kot je na primer omrežje neodvisnih strokovnjakov za temeljne pravice in zlasti strokovno mnenje Evropskega centra za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije (EUMC) ter njegovo informacijsko omrežje RAXEN;
35.Considers that the Agency should be designed as a multi-layered structure ("network of networks"), a specialised body with horizontal competences, in which each of the layers must play a role and contribute to the development of a fundamental rights culture in the Union; believes that the Agency should gather all relevant information, analyses and experience available in European and national institutions, national parliaments, governments and human rights bodies, Supreme/Constitutional Courts, NGOs and existing networks, such as the Network on Independent Experts in Fundamental Rights, and especially the expertise of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) and its information network, RAXEN;
40. ugotavlja, da zaščita nacionalnih manjšin v razširjeni EU predstavlja pomembno vprašanje in tega ni mogoče uresničevati zgolj z bojem proti ksenofobiji in diskriminaciji; poudarja, da je potrebno ta zapleteni problem obravnavati tudi z drugih zornih kotov in da mora biti vprašanje zaščite etničnih in narodnih manjšinj ena od posebnih nalog Agencije;
Notes that protecting national minorities in an enlarged EU is a major issue and that it will not be achieved simply by fighting against xenophobia and discrimination; points out that this complex problem must also be addressed from other angles and that the question of the protection of ethnic and national minorities should be one of the Agency's specific tasks;
42. meni, da mora Agencija za izpolnitev svojih treh glavnih funkcij zbirati podatke iz svojih omrežij in jih analizirati ter pridobiti pooblastila za predložitev mnenj in dajanje priporočil Parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji;
Is of the opinion that, in order to fulfil its three main functions, the Agency should collect data through its networks and analyse them and should be empowered to deliver opinions and make recommendations to Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
47. trdi, da je treba Agenciji zagotoviti svetovalno in posvetovalno vlogo v zvezi z določbami člena 6 in člena 7 PEU, da mora podpirati dejanja Parlamenta in Sveta in uporabljati podatke, znanje in strokovna znanje, pridobljene iz svojih omrežij;
Maintains that the Agency should be endowed with an advisory and consultative role regarding the provisions of Article 6 and Article 7 of the TEU, supporting the action of the Parliament and the Council and using the information, knowledge and expertise gathered from its networks;
Verjame, da je izboljšana strategija informiranja in komunikacije potrebna za dosego ciljev podpore temeljnih pravic in krepitve osveščenosti glede vprašanj o temeljnih pravicah (z ustvarjanjem kulture spoštovanja temeljnih pravic); verjame, da lahko vključitev predmeta, katerega vsebina bo zajemala tako temeljne pravice kot tudi človekove pravice, ki jih priznava mednarodna skupnost, v predmetnik šol v državah članicah, pripomore k uresničevanju teh ciljev
Believes that an enhanced information and communication strategy is necessary if the objectives of promoting fundamental rights and raising awareness of fundamental rights issues (creating a culture of respect for fundamental rights) are to be attained; believes that the inclusion of a subject on the Member States’ school curricula to cover both fundamental rights and the human rights recognised by the international community could help to attain these objectives;
51. pooblašča predsednika, da posreduje to resolucijo Evropskemu svetu, Svetu in Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, nacionalnim telesom na področju človekovih pravic, Svetu Evrope, OVSE in ZN.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Council, the Council and the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, national human rights bodies, the Council of Europe, the OSCE and the UN.
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS
o spodbujanju in varstvu temeljnih pravic: vloga nacionalnih in evropskih institucij, vključno z Agencijo za temeljne pravice
on promotion and protection of fundamental rights: the role of national and European institutions, including the Fundamental Rights Agency
Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. poudarja, da sta spodbujanje in varstvo temeljnih pravic na eni strani ter obstoj demokracije in pravne države na drugi strani neločljivo povezana;
Points out that promotion and protection of fundamental rights, on the one hand, and the existence of democracy and the rule of law, on the other, are indissolubly linked;
6. meni, da bi se morala Agencija ukvarjati z zbiranjem in analizo podatkov, spremljanjem in ocenjevanjem razmer glede človekovih pravic in odzivom na to ocenjevanje s primernimi priporočili za izboljšanje na ravni EU ter po potrebi na ravni držav članic;
Considers that the Agency should be concerned with data collection and analysis, the monitoring and evaluation of the situation regarding human rights and the response to be given to that evaluation, with appropriate recommendations for improvements at EU level and, if necessary, at Member State level;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj izvede in predloži Parlamentu poglobljeno študijo o potrebah po podobnem organu (znotraj ali izven Komisije), ki se bo ukvarjal z zagotavljanjem pomembnih podatkov s področja človekovih pravic in demokracije v državah, za katere ta Agencija ni pristojna.
Calls on the Commission to undertake and to present to Parliament, in conjunction with its position on this Agency, a thorough study on the need for a similar structure (inside or outside the Commission) dealing with the provision of relevant information on human rights and democracy concerns in countries which are not covered by this Agency.
Spodbujanje in varstvo temeljnih pravic: vloga nacionalnih in evropskih institucij, vključno z Agencijo za temeljne pravice
Promotion and protection of fundamental rights: the role of national and European institutions, including the Fundamental Rights Agency
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION
Odbor za kulturo in izobraževanje poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Culture and Education calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Agencija za temeljne pravice
The Fundamental Rights Agency
2. meni, da bi morala struktura predlagane agencije odsevati njene cilje in sestavo Listine o temeljnih pravicah; verjame, da bi morali biti posebni oddelki agencije odgovorni za spremljanje spoštovanja Listine na področju izobraževanja (člen 14) in spoštovanja kulturne, verske in jezikovne raznolikosti (člen 22);
Considers that the structure of the proposed Agency should reflect its objectives and the structure of the Charter of Fundamental Rights; believes that specific sections of the Agency should be responsible for monitoring adherence to the Charter in the area of education (Article 14), respect for cultural, religious and linguistic diversity (Article 22), and the media (Article 11);
Podpis in ratifikacija instrumentov Sveta Evrope
Signature and ratification of Council of Europe instruments
6. poziva Francijo, naj podpiše Okvirno konvencijo Sveta Evrope o varstvu narodnih manjšin; odločno poziva Belgijo, Grčijo, Latvijo, Luksemburg in Nizozemsko, naj Konvencijo raticifirajo;
Calls on France to sign the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities; urges Belgium, Greece, Latvia, Luxembourg and the Netherlands to ratify the Convention in the light of consultations with those concerned within their own communities and the need to heighten public awareness regarding the effective implementation of the provisions of the Convention upholding the interests of minorities;
9. izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi neustreznosti prostorov in praktične podpore se bodoči invalidni študentje pogosto ne morejo vključiti v nadaljevalno in visoko izobraževalne programe; meni, da so opisane razmere v nasprotju s svoboščinami iz člena 14(1) Listine; poziva države članice, da poskušajo ta problem rešiti;
Expresses its concern that, as a consequence of inadequate facilities and practical support, would-be students with disabilities are often unable to participate in post-compulsory and higher education; considers that this situation is contrary to the freedoms set out in Article 14(1) of the Charter; urges the Member States to address this problem;
Spodbujanje in varstvo temeljnih pravic: vloga nacionalnih in evropskih ustanov, vključno z Agencijo za temeljne pravice
Promotion and protection of fundamental rights: the role of national and European institutions, including the Fundamental Rights Agency
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS
Odbor za ustavne zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, da kot pristojni odbor v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije o obveščanju Komisije v zvezi s členom 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji: Varstvo in spodbujanje temeljnih vrednot Evropske unije
– having regard to its resolution on the Commission communication on Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union: respect for and promotion of the values on which the Union is based
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 20. aprila 2005, P5_TA(2004)0309 , na podlagi poročila AFCO, poročevalec: Johannes Voggenhuber. ,
Parliament resolution of 20 April 2004, P5_TA(2004)0309 , on the basis of the AFCO report, rapporteur: Johannes Voggenhuber. ,
1. meni, da obstoječi mednarodni, evropski in nacionalni instrumenti zagotavljajo ustrezne načine za varovanje temeljnih pravic v EU, in priznava, da Evropska komisija že preučuje vse predloge za zakonodajo in vse osnutke instrumentov za združljivost z Listino temeljnih pravic kot del običajnih postopkov odločanja; kljub temu ugotavlja, da bi bilo z izmenjavo izkušenj in znanja v večjem obsegu mogoče nasploh izboljšati standarde EU;
1. believes that the existing international, European and national instruments provide satisfactory means for protecting fundamental rights within the EU and recognizes the fact that the European Commission already scrutinizes all proposals for legislation and all draft instruments for compatibility with the Charter of Fundamental Rights as part of the normal decision-making procedures; notes, however, that it would be possible to achieve a general improvement in standards in the EU as a whole by sharing know-how and experience to a larger extent;
2. v zvezi s tem vidi možnost, da se obstoječe ustanove, instrumenti in postopki smiselno povežejo z Agencijo za temeljne pravice;
2. sees this framework as an opportunity to establish an effective network linking existing bodies, instruments and procedures through the establishment of a Fundamental Rights Agency;
3. poudarja, da je treba kljub temu nujno preprečiti vsako podvajanje že obstoječih institucij, instrumentov in postopkov ter tudi vsako odvečno birokratizacijo ideje o varstvu temeljnih pravic;
3. emphasises, however, in that connection, that any duplication of existing bodies, instruments and procedures must be avoided at all costs, as must any excessive bureaucratisation of the concept of the protection of fundamental rights;
4. poudarja, da ne gre za pripravo podlage za ustanovitev nečesa, kar bi bilo enakovredno Evropskemu sodišču za človekove pravice; ugotavlja, da se obravnavanje posameznih kršitev človekovih pravic v celoti razlikuje od spremljanja političnega sistema ali njegovih pravnih instrumentov, ki se morda ne morejo primerjati s splošno priznanimi standardi o človekovih pravicah.
4. stresses that there is no question of preparing the ground for anything equivalent to an EU Court of Human Rights; realizes that dealing with individual violations of human rights is altogether different from monitoring a political system or its legal instruments, which may not be living up to generally recognized human rights standards.
Odbor, zaprošen za mnenje Datum razglasitve na plenarnem zasedanju
Committee asked for its opinion Date announced in plenary
Pripravljavec(-ka) mnenja Datum imenovanja
Drafts( wo )man Date appointed
Predlogi sprememb zakonodajnega besedila
Amendments to a legislative text
Besedilo, zapisano v navadnem poševnem tisku, označuje tehničnim službam namenjen del zakonodajnega besedila s predlaganimi popravki, ki se upoštevajo pri pripravi končnega besedila (na primer očitne napake ali izpusti v zadevni jezikovni različici).
Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................57
OPINION OF THE commiTTEE ON BUDGETS .................................................................62
MNENJE ODBORA ZA REGIONALNI RAZVOJ..................................................................62
OPINION OF THE commiTTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ..................................67