natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– Razviti postopke ocenjevanja tveganja in upravljanja kot orodja za odločanje, zlasti v zvezi z nalogami Evropskega parlamenta, Komisije, Sveta in agencij.
- To develop risk assessments and management procedures as tools for decision making, in particular with regard to the tasks of the European Parliament, Commission, Council, and Agencies.
Ocena tveganja je postopek, ki omogoča kvantitativno primerjavo med različnimi možnostmi odločanja.
Risk assessment is a procedure that allows a comparison to be made between different options in a quantitative on the decision taking.
Skupno raziskovalno središče mora biti temelj za nadaljnji razvoj tega postopka za vse evropske institucije.
JRC should be the core for a further development of this procedure as a support to all European Institutions.
Priloga I, poglavje IV Zmogljivosti, podnaslov Nejedrske dejavnosti Skupnega raziskovalnega središča, podnaslov Dejavnosti, zaporedna točka 2, alinea 3 a (novo)
Annex I, Chapter IV "Capacities", subtitle "Non-nuclear actions of the Joint Research Centre", subtitle "Activities", bullet 2, indent 3 a (new)
– Zagotoviti strokovno znanje in imeti osrednjo vlogo pri raziskovalnih dejavnostih za globalno nadzorovanje okolja in varnosti (GMES) ter razvoju novih aplikacij na tem področju.
- To provide expertise and play a central role in GMES research activities and in the development of new applications in this field.
Ta predlog spremembe poskuša pojasniti nesporazum v zvezi z globalnim nadzorovanjem okolja in varnosti, ki izhaja iz dejstva, da je predviden kot operativni program, ki zdaj prejema finančna sredstva EU, ki so potencialno na voljo, le iz sredstev za raziskave (okvirni program).
This amendment tries to clarify the misunderstanding on GMES which is caused by the fact that it is intended to be an operational programme whose only source of EU potentially available funding today is research money (FP).
Priloga I, poglavje IV Zmogljivosti, podnaslov Nejedrske dejavnosti Skupnega raziskovalnega središča, podnaslov Dejavnosti, zaporedna točka 2, alinea 4 a (novo)
Annex I, Chapter IV "Capacities", subtitle "Non-nuclear actions of the Joint Research Centre", subtitle "Activities", bullet 2, indent 4 a (new)
– Spodbujati in izboljšati razvoj in potrjevanje nadomestnih strategij ter zlasti metod, ki ne vključujejo živali, na vseh pomembnih področjih raziskovanja (ocena varnosti, preskušanje cepiva, zdravstvene in biomedicinske raziskave itd.).
- To promote and enhance the development and validation of alternative strategies, and in particular non-animal methods, in all relevant areas of research (safety assessment, vaccine testing, health and biomedical research, etc.)
V skladu z zahtevami Protokola o zaščiti in dobrem počutju živali, členom 23 Direktive Sveta 86/609/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena, ter ciljem predlagane uredbe EU za spodbujanje preskusov, ki ne vključujejo živali, je treba razvoj in nadomestne preskusne strategije ter zlasti metode, ki ne vključujejo živali, vključiti med dejavnosti Skupnega raziskovalnega središča.
In accordance with the requirements in the Protocol on protection and welfare of animals, Art.23 of Council Directive 86/609/EEC as amended, and the objective of the proposed EU Regulation to promote non-animal testing, the development and alternative testing strategies and in particular non-animal test methods should be included among the activities of JRC.
Priloga III, podnaslov Neposredni ukrepi, odstavek 3
Annex III, subtitle “Indirect actions”, paragraph 3
Kadar se lahko uporabi različne sheme financiranja, se lahko v delovnih programih določi, katera shema financiranja se bo uporabila za temo, v zvezi s katero so predloženi predlogi.
Where different funding schemes can be used, the work programmes may specify the funding scheme to be used for the topic on which proposals are invited.
Načeloma je treba odločitev o shemah financiranja prepustiti raziskovalnemu osebju in le na zelo posebnih področjih se lahko v delovnih programih določi, katera shema financiranja se bo uporabila za temo, v zvezi s katero se predložijo predlogi.
In principle the choice of funding schemes should be left to research staff and only in very specific areas may the work programmes specify the funding scheme to be used for the topic on which proposals are invited.
Izkušnje iz šestega okvirnega programa kažejo, da mora končne odločitve o shemah financiranja sprejemati raziskovalno osebje.
Experience from the Sixth Framework Programme has shown that the final choice of funding schemes should be left to research staff.
Priloga III, podnaslov Neposredni ukrepi, odstavek 4, točka (a), točka 1
Annex III, subtitle “Indirect actions”, paragraph 4, point (a), point 1
Podpora raziskovalnim projektom, ki jih izvajajo konzorciji z udeleženci iz različnih držav, z namenom razvijanja novega znanja, nove tehnologije , izdelkov ali skupnih virov za raziskave.
Support to research projects carried out by consortia with participants from different countries, aiming at developing new knowledge, new technology, products or common resources for research.
Obseg, področje uporabe in notranja organizacija projektov se lahko razlikujejo od področja do področja in od teme do teme.
The size, scope and internal organisation of projects can vary from field to field and from topic to topic.
Projekti lahko segajo od majhnih ali srednje velikih usmerjenih raziskovalnih dejavnosti do obsežnih integriranih projektov, pri katerih je za dosego določenega cilja treba zbrati znatno količino virov.
Projects can range from small or medium-scale focused research actions to larger integrating projects which mobilise a significant volume of resources for achieving a defined objective.
Podpora raziskovalnim projektom, ki jih izvajajo konzorciji z udeleženci iz različnih držav, da bi razvili novo znanje in tehnologije, izdelke ali skupne vire za raziskave.
Support to research projects carried out by consortia with participants from different countries, aiming at developing new knowledge, new technology, products or common resources for research.
Projekti lahko vključujejo različne raziskovalne dejavnosti, od majhnih ali srednje velikih do obsežnih integriranih projektov, pri katerih je za dosego določenega cilja treba zbrati znatno količino virov.
Projects can range from small or medium-scale focused research actions to larger integrating projects which mobilise a significant volume of resources for achieving a defined objective.
Projekte je treba usmeriti v manjše projektne konzorcije in MSP.
Projects should be targeted on smaller project consortia and SMEs.
Zato se uvedejo projekti z enostavnimi, kratkimi in hitrimi postopki brez zapletenih finančnih načel in nepotrebnega poročanja.
For this purpose, projects with simple, short and quick procedures, devoid of complex financial principles and unnecessary reporting will be introduced.
Priloga III, podnaslov Neposredni ukrepi, odstavek 4, točka (a), točka 4
Annex III, subtitle “Indirect actions”, paragraph 4, point (a), point 4
Podpora projektom, ki jih izvajajo posamezne raziskovalne skupine.
Support to projects carried out by individual research teams.
Ta shema se bo večinoma uporabljala za podporo pionirskim raziskovalnim projektom, ki jih sprožijo raziskovalci in se financirajo v okviru Sveta za evropske raziskave.
This scheme will mainly be used to support investigator-driven “frontier” research projects funded in the framework of the European Research Council
Ta shema se bo večinoma uporabljala za podporo pionirskim raziskovalnim projektom, ki jih sprožijo raziskovalci in se financirajo prek prenosljivih nepovratnih sredstev v okviru Sveta za evropske raziskave.
This scheme will mainly be used to support investigator-driven “frontier” research projects funded through portable grants in the framework of the European Research Council.
Med Komisijo in drugo pravno osebo so podpisani sporazumi o nepovratnih sredstvih.
Grant agreements are signed between the Commission and another legal entity.
Vendar, če se odgovorni raziskovalec preseli v drugo raziskovalno organizacijo, se morajo nepovratna sredstva prenesti skupaj z njim.
However, if responsible researcher moves to another research organisation, the grant should be transferred with him/her.
Priloga III, podnaslov Neposredni ukrepi, odstavek 4, točka (a), točka 5
Annex III, subtitle "Indirect Actions" paragraph 4, point (a), point 5
Podpora usposabljanju in poklicnemu razvoju raziskovalcev, se bo večinoma uporabljala pri izvajanju aktivnosti Marie Curie.
Support for training and career development of researchers, mainly used for the implementation of the Marie Curie actions.
Podpora usposabljanju in poklicnemu razvoju raziskovalcev v vseh programih, projektih in pobudah ter tudi v dejavnostih Marie Curie.
Support for training and career development of researchers in all programmes, projects and initiatives, and also in the Marie Curie actions.
Spodbujanje pogojev, ki ženskam olajšajo začetek in nadaljevanje raziskovalne kariere.
Promotion of the conditions which make it easier for women to enter and pursue a research career.
Pristno vključevanje zahteva obsežno politiko in podporne zmogljivosti, kot so vrtci in pomoč pri mobilnosti.
Genuine integration calls for a comprehensive policy and for support facilities such as childcare centres and assisted mobility.
Priloga III, podnaslov Neposredni ukrepi, odstavek 4, točka (a), točka 6
Annex III, subtitle "Indirect Actions", paragraph 4, point (a), point 6.
Podpora raziskovalnim projektom, kjer večino raziskovalnega dela v korist posebnih skupin, zlasti MSP ali združenj MSP, opravijo univerze, raziskovalna središča ali druga zakonita telesa.
Support to research projects where the bulk of the research is carried out by universities, research centres or other legal entities, for the benefit of specific groups, in particular SMEs or associations of SMEs.
Prizadevanja bodo potekala v smeri aktiviranja dodatnega financiranja iz skupine Evropske investicijske banke (EIB).
Efforts will be undertaken to mobilise additional financing from the EIB Group.
Preden lahko nova tehnologija pridobi sredstva za razvoj in raziskave, mora najprej opraviti zahtevnejšo nalogo zagotovitve denarja za zasnovo.
Before a technology start-up is able to attract seed money, it must first achieve the more challenging task of securing pre-seed money.
Z denarjem za zasnovo se financirajo dejavnosti, namenjene dokazovanju investitorjem, da ima nova tehnologija določeno raven komercialne in tehnične izvedljivosti.
Pre-seed money is used to fund activities aimed at proving to investors that a new technology has a certain level of commercial and technical viability.
Te dejavnosti običajno vključujejo: a) izvedbo tržne ocene, b) izdelavo delujočega prototipa in c) druge dejavnosti, kot so: jamstvo svetovalcev, začetni stroški za razvoj človeških virov, pomoč pri pisanju za nepovratna sredstva in investitorji, ki iščejo pomoč.
These activities often include: a) conducting a marketing assessment, b) creating a working prototype, and c) other activities like: underwriting of consultants, initial human resource development costs, grant writing assistance and assistance seeking investors.
Denar za zasnovo je ključen, zahteva pravočasen razvoj in ga je v primerjavi s sredstvi za razvoj in raziskave na voljo zelo malo.
Pre-seed money is vital, requires timely deployment and is in very short supply compared to seed funding.
Priloga III, podnaslov Neposredni ukrepi, odstavek 4, točka (b), odstavek 1, opomba 25
Annex III, subtitle "Indirect Actions", paragraph 4, point (b), paragraph 1, footnote 25
Ali Sveta v posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
Or by the Council in consultation with the European Parliament
Podporo ukrepu je treba izvesti v postopku soodločanja.
Support action should be implemented under the co-decision procedure.
Priloga III, podnaslov Neposredni ukrepi, odstavek 4, točka (b), zaporedna točka 2
Annex III, subtitle "Indirect Actions", paragraph 4, point (b), bullet 2
Finančni prispevek Skupnosti k izvajanju skupnih tehnoloških pobud za uresničevanje ciljev, ki se ne morejo uresničiti s finančnimi shemami iz točke 1 zgoraj.
A financial contribution from the Community to the implementation of Joint Technology Initiatives to realise objectives that cannot be achieved through the funding schemes identified in point 1 above.
Skupne tehnološke pobude bodo aktivirale kombinacijo finančnih sredstev različne narave in iz različnih virov, zasebnih in javnih, evropskih in nacionalnih.
Joint Technology Initiatives will mobilise a combination of funding of different nature and from different sources, private and public, European and national.
To financiranje se lahko izvede v različnih oblikah in se lahko dodeli ali aktivira z raznimi mehanizmi: s podporo iz okvirnega programa, s posojili Evropske investicijske banke ali s podporo rizičnemu kapitalu.
This funding can take different forms and can be allocated or mobilised though a range of mechanisms: support from the Framework Programme, loans from the European Investment Bank, support to risk capital.
Skupne tehnološke pobude se lahko določijo in izvajajo na podlagi člena 171 Pogodbe (to lahko vključuje oblikovanje skupnih podjetij) ali z odločitvami o posebnih programih.
Joint Technology Initiatives may be decided and implemented on the basis of Article 171 of the Treaty (this may include the creation of joint undertakings) or through the Specific Programme Decisions.
Podpora Skupnosti se bo zagotavljala glede na opredelitev splošnega načrta finančnega inženiringa, ki bo temeljil na formalnih obvezah vseh zadevnih strani.
Community support will be provided subject to the definition of an overall blueprint of financial engineering, based on formal commitments from all parties concerned.
Pravila za udeležbo bodo obsegala posebne ukrepe za zagotovitev tega, da se v zvezi z izvajanjem skupnih tehnoloških pobud (JTI) spodbujata in podpirata dostop in udeležba MSP in malih raziskovalnih skupin, vključno z njihovo ustrezno vključenostjo v postopek sprejemanja odločitev.
Rules for Participation will include specific measures to ensure that as regards the implementation of Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs), access and participation by SMEs and small research groups, including their adequate involvement in the decision taking procedures, is encouraged and supported.
Ta vidik skupnih tehnoloških pobud mora biti po njihovi vzpostavitvi sestavni del njihovega rednega vrednotenja.
This aspect of the JTIs must be an element in their periodic evaluation after their establishment .
Priloga III, odstavka 4 a in 4 b(novo)
Annex III, paragraphs 4 a and 4 b(new)
Glede na podrobno ureditev, ki bo vzpostavljena z uredbo, sprejeto v skladu s členom 167 Pogodbe, in v skladu z njo ter odločbami Sveta, ki sprejema posebne programe, bo sistem financiral dejavnosti za prenos tehnologije z univerz, iz raziskovalnih središč ali drugih pravnih oseb, ki so dejavne na področju prenosa tehnologije.
Subject to and in accordance with detailed arrangements to be established by the regulation adopted pursuant to Article 167 of the Treaty and Council decisions adopting the specific programmes, the facility will finance technology transfer activities from universities, research centres or other legal entities active in the field of technology transfer.
Področje prenosa tehnologije v Evropi ima številne strukturne pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile ugotovljene v različnih študijah (npr. študija o pospeševanju prenosa tehnologije, ki sta jo opravila Generalni direktorat za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (DG RTD) ter delovna skupina za biotehnologijo britanskega predsedstva EU).
The technology transfer landscape in Europe suffers from a number of structural weaknesses that have been identified by various studies (e.g Techology transfer accelerator study from DG RTD, UK presidency EU biotechnology working group).
Da se odpravi ta tržna napaka, je treba razviti poseben sistem, ki bo lahko imel pomembno vlogo pri pripravljanju projektov z univerz ali iz raziskovalnih središč do razvojne stopnje, na kateri bi potem lahko npr. tvegani kapital imel pomembno vlogo.
In order to tackle this market failure, it is essential to develop a specific facility which could play an important role in preparing projects from universities or research centres to a development stage where venture capital for example could thereafter play a role.
Z današnjim dnem noben instrument Skupnosti ne omenja te posebne vrzeli, kar je nujno za konkurenčnost evropskega gospodarstva in trženje raziskav.
As of today, no Community instruments address this particular gap which is essential for the competitiveness of the European economy and the commercialisation of research.
Glede na pomembnost takšne vrzeli bi bil lahko ta sistem za prenos tehnologije izveden prek sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave, upravljal pa bi ga lahko Evropski investicijski sklad (EIF), ki bi lahko odpravil vrzel med programom za konkurenčnost in inovacije ter okvirnim programom za raziskave.
Given the importance of such gap, this technology transfer facility could be implemented through the 7th Research Framework Programme and operated by the European Investment Fund (EIF) which would be able to bridge the gap between the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme and the Research Framework Programme.
Priloga III, podnaslov Neposredni ukrepi, odstavek 6
Annex III, subtitle "Indirect Actions", paragraph 6
Poleg neposredne finančne podpore udeležencem bo Skupnost izboljšala njihov dostop do posojil EIB v okviru „ Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja “, in sicer z zagotovitvijo finančne podpore banki.
In addition to direct financial support to participants, the Community will improve their access to EIB loans through the “Risk-Sharing Finance Facility” by providing a grant to the Bank.
Banka bo podporo Skupnosti poleg svojih lastnih sredstev uporabila za kritje rezervacij in dodelitve kapitala za financiranje posojil.
The Community grant shall be used by the Bank, in addition to its own funds, to cover the provisioning and capital allocation for its loan financing.
V skladu z modalitetami, uvedenimi z uredbo in sprejetimi v skladu s členom 167 Pogodbe, in sklepi Sveta o sprejetju posebnih programov bo ta program omogočal večje posojanje sredstev EIB za ukrepe RTR (kot so skupne tehnološke pobude, veliki projekti – vključno s projekti Eureka – in nove raziskovalne infrastrukture).
Subject to and in accordance with modalities to be established by the regulation adopted pursuant article 167 of the Treaty and the Council decisions adopting the specific programmes, this mechanism will enable broader EIB lending to European RTD actions (such as joint technology initiatives, large projects-including Eureka projects, and new research infrastructures).
Skupnost bo poleg neposredne finančne podpore udeležencem izboljšala tudi njihov dostop do posojil EIB v okviru Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja , in sicer z zagotovitvijo finančne podpore banki.
In addition to direct financial support to participants, the Community will improve their access to EIB loans through the “Risk-Sharing Finance Facility” by providing a grant to the Bank.
V skladu z modalitetami, uvedenimi z uredbo in sprejetimi v skladu s členom 167 Pogodbe, in sklepi Sveta o sprejetju posebnih programov bo ta program omogočal večje posojanje sredstev EIB za ukrepe za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (kot so skupne tehnološke pobude, veliki projekti – vključno s projekti Eureka – nove raziskovalne infrastrukture in projekti, ki jih vodijo MSP ).
Subject to and in accordance with modalities to be established by the regulation adopted pursuant article 167 of the Treaty and the Council decisions adopting the specific programmes, this mechanism will enable broader EIB lending to European RTD actions (such as joint technology initiatives, large projects-including Eureka projects, new research infrastructures and projects run by SMEs ).
Pri razvijanju tega sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja za spodbujanje naložb zasebnega sektorja v projekte raziskav in razvoja se je treba posvetovati z akterji regionalnega razvoja.
Regional development actors should be consulted in the development of this "Risk-Sharing Finance Facility" in order to leverage R&D projects with private-sector investment.
Ta mehanizem naj bi bil uveden pozneje, zato ga je treba le še spodbujati.
This mechanism was to have been introduced at a later stage so all that is needed is for it to be brought forward.
Priloga III, podnaslov Neposredni ukrepi, odstavek 7 a (novo)
Annex III, subtitle "Indirect Actions", paragraph 7 a (new)
Področje prenosa tehnologije v Evropi ima številne strukturne pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile ugotovljene v različnih študijah (npr. študija o pospeševanju prenosa tehnologije, ki sta jo opravila Generalni direktorat za raziskave (GD RTD) ter delovna skupina za biotehnologijo britanskega predsedstva EU).
The technology transfer landscape in Europe suffers from a number of structural weaknesses that have been identified by various studies (e.g Technology transfer accelerator study from DG RTD, UK presidency EU biotechnology working group).
Priloga II, OKVIRNA PORAZDELITEV MED PROGRAME
Annex II, Indicative breakdown among programmes
Prehrana, kmetijstvo in biotehnologija
Food, Agriculture and Biotechnology
Informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije
Information and Communication Technologies
Nanoznanosti, nanotehnologije, materiali in nove proizvodne tehnologije
Nanosciences, Nanotechnologies, Materials and new Production Technologies
Okolje (vključno s podnebnimi spremembami)
Environment (including Climate Change)
Promet (vključno z aeronavtiko)
Transport (including Aeronautics)
Socialno-ekonomske znanosti in humanistične vede
Socio-economic Sciences and the Humanities
Raziskovalne infrastrukture
Research Infrastructures
Raziskave v korist MSP
Research for the benefit of SMEs
Regije znanja
Regions of Knowledge
Raziskovalni potencial
Research Potential
Znanost v družbi
Science in Society
Dejavnosti mednarodnega sodelovanja
Activities of International Co-operation
Nejedrske dejavnosti Skupnega raziskovalnega središča
Non-nuclear actions of the Joint Research Centre
Predlog spremembe, ki ga vlaga Parlament
Amendment by Parliament
Potrebne so prilagoditve, da se okvirni program uskladi s stališčem Evropskega parlamenta o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o proračunski disciplini (vključno s finančno perspektivo 2007 – 20013), sprejetem na plenarnem zasedanju 15. maja 2006, in s proračunsko dodelitvijo določijo prednosti okvirnega programa, ki jih podpirajo vse politične skupine v odboru ITRE.
Adjustments are made to bring the Framework Programme in line with the European Parliament's position on the Interinstitutional Agreement on Budgetary Discipline (including the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013) as adopted by Plenary on 15 May 2006, and to indicate by internal budgetary allocation the priorities for the Framework Programme which are shared by all political groups in ITRE.
Evropa si zasluži več
Europe deserves better
Vrh v Lizboni je potrdil vzpostavitev evropskega raziskovalnega prostora (ERA), ki bi združeval dejavnosti s področja raziskav in inovacij po vsej Evropi, na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Barceloni pa je bilo dogovorjeno, da je treba povečati skupno porabo za raziskave in razvoj v Uniji, da bi se do leta 2010 približala 3% BDP; dve tretjini novih vlaganj bi prispeval zasebni sektor.
The Lisbon Summit endorsed the creation of the European Research Area (ERA) integrating research and innovation activities throughout Europe, while at the Barcelona European Council it was agreed that overall spending on R&D in the Union should be increased with the aim of approaching 3% of GDP by 2010, with two thirds of this new investments coming from the private sector.
skupina na visoki ravni pod predsedstvom Wima Koka
In its report on the Lisbon Strategy, the High-Level Group chaired by Mr Wim Kok
http://europa.eu.int/comm/councils/bx20041105/kok_report_en.pdf je v svojem poročilu o lizbonski strategiji opredelila razvoj družbe znanja kot eno od petih prednostnih področij politike.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/councils/bx20041105/kok_report_en.pdf identified the development of a knowledge-based society as one of top five policy areas.