natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0010/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0010/2006 ),
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3181/78 in Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1736/79 na področju monetarne politike
Proposal for a Council Regulation repealing Council Regulation (EEC) 3181/78 and Council Regulation (EEC) 1736/79 in the area of Monetary Policy
Poročevalka Datum imenovanja:
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o pristopu Skupnosti k Pravilniku št. 55 Gospodarske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo o enotnih določbah o odobritvi mehanskih elementov za spenjanje med seboj povezanih cestnih vozil
on the proposal for a Council decision on the accession of the Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No. 55 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of vehicles
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA......................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................2
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2005)0019 - 11233/2005)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0019 - 11233/2005)
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Sveta za privolitev Parlamenta na podlagi členov 3(3) in 4(2), druga alineja Sklepa Sveta 97/836/ES s 27. novembra 1997 ( C6‑0317/2005 ),
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 3(3), Article 4(2), second indent of Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 ( C6‑0317/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 75(1) in člena 43(1) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 75(1) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6‑0011/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0011/2006 ),
Predlog Sklepa Sveta o pristopu Skupnosti k Pravilniku št. 55 Gospodarske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo o enotnih določbah o odobritvi mehanskih elementov za spenjanje med seboj povezanih cestnih vozil
Proposal for a Council decision on the accession of the Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No. 55 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of vehicles
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta, ki spreminja Sklepa 2001/507/ES in 2001/509/ES z namenom, da Uredbi ZN/ECE 109 in 108 o obnovljenih pnevmatikah postaneta obvezni
on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decisions 2001/507/EC and 2001/509/EC with a view to making UN/ECE Regulations 109 and 108 on retreaded tyres compulsory
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2004)0774 - 9916/2005)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0774 - 9916/2005)
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Sveta za privolitev Parlamenta v skladu s členom 3(3), členom 4(2), druga alinea in členom 4(4) Sklepa Sveta 97/836/ES z dne 27. novembra 1997
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 3(3), Article 4(2), second indent and Article 4(4) of Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997
– ob upoštevanju členov 75(1) in 43(1) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 75(1) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6‑0012/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0012/2006 ),
Predlog Sklepa Sveta, ki spreminja Sklepa 2001/507/ES in 2001/509/ES z namenom, da Uredbi ZN/ECE 109 in 108 o obnovljenih pnevmatikah postaneta obvezni
Proposal for a Council decision amending Decisions 2001/507/EC and 2001/509/EC with a view to making UN/ECE Regulations 109 and 108 on retreaded tyres compulsory
o selitvi proizvodnje v okviru regionalnega razvoja
on relocation in the context of regional development
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................13
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS..............13
– ob upoštevanju Listine o temeljnih socialnih pravicah delavcev iz leta 1989 in pripadajočega akcijskega programa,
– having regard to the 1989 Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers and the associated action programme,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 94/45/ES z dne 22. septembra 1994 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sveta delavcev ali uvedbi postopka obveščanja in posvetovanja z delavci v družbah ali povezanih družbah na območju Skupnosti
– having regard to Council Directive 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European works council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees
UL L 254, 30.9.1994, str.
OJ L 254, 30.9.1994, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 98/59/ES z dne 20. julija 1998 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi s kolektivnimi odpusti
­– having regard to Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies
UL L 225, 12.8.1998, str.
OJ L 225, 12.8.1998, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2001/23/ES z dne 12. marca 2001 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z ohranjanjem pravic delavcev v primeru prenosa podjetij, obratov ali delov podjetij ali obratov
– having regard to Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses
UL L 082, 22.3 2001, str.
OJ L 82, 22.3.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/14/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2002 o določitvi splošnega okvira za obveščanje in posvetovanje z delavci v Evropski skupnosti
– having regard to Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije - Smernice o državni regionalni pomoči
– having regard to the Commission communication on guidelines on national regional aid
UL C 74, 10.3.1998, str.
OJ C 74, 10.3.1998, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije - Ponovna ocena smernic o državni regionalni pomoči za obdobje po 1. januarju 2007
– having regard to the Commission communication on review of the guidelines on national regional aid for the period after 1 January 2007
UL C 110, 8.5.2003, str.
OJ C 110, 8.5.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2204/2002 z dne 12. decembra 2002 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe o ES za državne pomoči na področju zaposlovanja
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment
UL L, 13.12.2002, str.
OJ L 337, 13.12.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. aprila 2004 o sporočilu Komisije - Tretje poročilo o gospodarski in socialni koheziji
– having regard to its resolution of 22 April 2004 on the Commission communication on the Third Report on economic and social cohesion
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2005 o predlogu uredbe Sveta o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2005 on the proposal for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
Besedila, sprejeta dne 6.7.2005, P6_TA(2005)0277 . ,
Texts adopted, 6.7.2005, P6_TA(2005)0277 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. marca 2003 o zapiranju podjetij, ki so prejemala finančno pomoč Evropske unije
– having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2003 on the closure of companies which have benefited from EU financial assistance
– ob upoštevanju členov 87(3), 136 in 158 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 87(3), 136 and 158 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj in mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6‑0013/2006 ),
– having regard to the report by the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6-0013/2006 ),
A. ker je cilj regionalne razvojne politike podpirati razvoj regij v Evropski uniji; ker je zato potrebno zagotoviti usklajenost med regionalno razvojno politiko in konkurenčno politiko, kar pomeni, da javne pomoči ne smejo spodbujati selitev gospodarskih dejavnosti,
A. whereas the goal of regional development policy is to encourage the development of the regions of the European Union, and to this end, it is necessary to ensure consistency between regional development policy and competition policy, and whereas this means that public aid must not provide a spur to the relocation of economic activity,
B. ker je kohezijska politika sredstvo, ki Evropski uniji omogoča zmanjšanje razlik v najrevnejših regijah, in je bistvena za podporo podjetjem in naložbe v infrastrukturne projekte v navedenih regijah; ker je javna pomoč pravno sredstvo za doseganje tega cilja,
B. whereas Cohesion Policy is an instrument of the European Union that enables it to reduce disparities affecting the poorest regions and it is essential to support companies and invest in infrastructure projects within those regions; whereas public aid is a legal instrument for achieving that objective,
C. ker se podjetja odločijo za selitev svojih dejavnosti zaradi številnih razlogov, od katerih nekateri niso v ničemer povezani z vprašanji produktivnosti, učinkovitosti ali rentabilnosti; ker pa so lahko posledice takih selitev ukinitve številnih delovnih mest in gospodarske težave, ki imajo posebno velik vpliv na regionalni razvoj, ker obstaja v zapuščeni regiji le malo možnosti za zaposlitev,
C. whereas companies choose to relocate their activities for manifold reasons, some of which are in no way connected to issues of productivity, efficiency or economic viability; whereas such relocation is liable, however, to result in major job losses and economic hardships whose impact on regional development will be all the more pronounced where there are few employment possibilities in the region abandoned,
D. ker je glede na to situacijo na ravni Skupnosti nujno treba sprejeti pravni regulativni okvir za vzpostavitev sistemov nadzora, namenjenih ovrednotenju gospodarskih in socialnih stroškov vsake selitve proizvodnje; ker je Evropski parlament v svoji Resoluciji z dne 6. julija 2005 o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu
D. whereas in the light of the situation described above it is necessary to adopt a Community wide regulatory legal framework so that monitoring systems can be set up to quantify the economic and social cost of any relocation; whereas the European Parliament, in its resolution of 6 July 2005 on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
P6_TA(2005)0277 . pozval k sprejetju vseh potrebnih pravnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da podjetja, ki prejemajo finančno pomoč Skupnosti, ne bi svojih obratov za daljše ali vnaprej določeno obdobje premestila na drugo območje, in k sprejetju določbe, s katero bi se prepovedalo sofinanciranje projektov, ki imajo za posledico bistveno izgubo delovnih mest ali zapiranje obratov na njihovih obstoječih lokacijah; ker je Parlament v svoji Resoluciji z dne 15. decembra 2005 o vlogi neposredne državne pomoči kot orodju regionalnega razvoja
P6_TA(2005)0277 . , called for the adoption of all necessary legal measures to ensure that firms which receive Community funding do not relocate for a long and predetermined period, and for a provision ruling out the cofinancing of operations which result in substantial job losses or the closure of plants at their existing locations; whereas it also considered, in its resolution of 15 December 2005 on the role of direct State aid as a tool of regional development
P6_TA(2005)0527 . tudi menil, da pomoč EU za preselitev podjetij ne prispeva k evropski dodani vrednosti, zato jo je ocenil kot nepotrebno,
P6_TA(2005)0527 . , that EU aid for company relocations does not provide any European added value and should therefore be avoided,
E. ker globalizacija, tehnološki napredek in odstranjevanje ovir za vstop v nekatere države olajšujejo mednarodne izmenjave ter Evropski uniji ponujajo možnosti v globaliziranem svetu, ker pa lahko tudi povečajo nevarnost selitve proizvodnje,
E. whereas globalisation, technological progress and the fact that barriers to access to certain countries have been reduced facilitates international trade and presents the European Union with opportunities in a globalised world, but may also increase the risks of relocation,
F. ker bi javna pomoč morala prispevati k ustvarjanju trajnih delovnih mest,
F. whereas public aid must contribute to creating lasting employment,
G. ker niti statistični mehanizem Skupnosti niti statistični mehanizmi držav Unije v tem trenutku ne zmorejo podati skupnih in natančnih podatkov o obsegu selitev dejavnosti v Uniji in izven nje, zlasti če gre za ovrednotenje selitev podjetij in vplivov, ki jih imajo selitve na zaposlitev v izvornih in namembnih državah; ker bi bilo torej treba okrepiti evropska statistična sredstva,
G. whereas neither the Community's statistical system nor those of the EU Member States are able at present to provide comprehensive and accurate data on the scale of relocations of activities within or out of the Union, particularly when it comes to quantifying company relocations and their impact on employment in the country of origin and the new host country; whereas the European statistical mechanism should therefore be reinforced,
H. ker je lahko javna pomoč potrebna kot nujen ukrep v okoliščinah, v katerih bo prestrukturiranje ali selitev proizvodnje povzročila množično izgubo delovnih mest v določenem kraju,
H. whereas public aid may be needed as an emergency measure in circumstances where restructuring or relocation will lead to major job losses in a given locality,
3. poudarja, da mora biti namen strukturnih in kohezijskih skladov kohezija, ki zajema spodbujanje povezanosti in solidarnosti med državami članicami, in da se mora ves trud prednostno usmerjati na regije v gospodarskem zaostanku;
Points out that the Structural and Cohesion Funds must serve the purpose of cohesion consisting of promoting cohesiveness and solidarity between Member States, and that efforts must focus as a priority on the regions lagging behind economically;
7. poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da evropska regionalna politika ne bi spodbujala selitve podjetij, ki povzroča izgube delovnih mest;
Calls on the Commission to take all requisite measures to prevent European regional policy becoming an incentive to the relocation of companies with ensuing job losses;
11. meni, da je zaradi neusklajenosti naših nacionalnih socialnih sistemov treba nujno sprejeti vrsto usklajenih ukrepov znotraj različnih politik Unije; poziva, naj se takoj izdela splošna evropska strategija preprečevanja, umeščanja v okvir in spremljanja selitev podjetij v Evropski uniji in izven nje, ki jo bo vodila Unija v sodelovanju z vsemi državami članicami;
Believes that in the absence of better coordination of the European Union’s national systems of social provision, it is now imperative that a package of coordinated measures be implemented via the Union’s various policies; for that reason, calls for the rapid establishment of a European strategy for averting, managing and monitoring the relocation of companies within and also out of the EU, implemented at Union level and coordinated with all the Member States;
14. poziva Komisijo, da v novih smernicah o državni pomoči regijam sprejme ukrepe, ki bodo podjetjem, ki ne spoštujejo pogojev za pridobitev pomoči ali ki selijo svoje dejavnosti znotraj ali zunaj meja Evropske unije, naložili vračilo te pomoči;
Calls on the Commission to take measures adapting the new guidelines on national regional aid with a view to repayment of the aid granted to companies which fail to comply with the conditions attaching to the aid and which relocate their plants within or, in particular, out of the EU;
23. meni, da bi z zagotavljanjem večje preglednosti glede vseh lokacij, kjer poteka proizvodnja izdelkov v celoti, delno ali po licenci, ter veljavnih delovnih standardov z na primer „kodeksom delovnih standardov“ in „kodeksom poštene trgovine“ lahko vplivali na odločitev kupcev in potrošnikov pri nakupovanju; vztraja, da je treba v podobnem kodeksu zajeti vse oblike licenčne proizvodnje, in poziva Komisijo, naj prevzame pobudo pri oblikovanju takšnega kodeksa, ki bi vseboval standarde ILO, vključno z minimalnimi pogoji za zastopanost delavcev v primerih, ko so proizvodi v celoti, deloma ali licenčno proizvedeni v državi nečlanici EU;
Is convinced that greater transparency regarding all the places where products are made, be it wholly, in part, or under licence, and the labour standards in force, to be provided through, for example, a ‘codex for working standards’ and a ‘fair trade codex’, could help to influence buyers and consumers in their choice of purchases; maintains that all forms of production under licence should be covered by a codex of the above type and calls on the Commission to take the lead in devising such a codex, which should encompass the ILO standards, including the minimum conditions for employee representation in cases where goods are produced wholly, in part, or under licence in non-member countries;
30. zahteva, naj Komisija v skladu z njenim predlogom v reformi strukturnih skladov pripravi mehanizem, s katerim bo ostreje kaznovala podjetja, ki so prejela javno pomoč in svoje dejavnosti delno ali v celoti selijo izven Evropske unije;
Calls on the Commission, in line with its proposals in connection with the reform of the Structural Funds, to draw up provisions designed to penalise more severely companies which, after having received public subsidies, relocate all or part of their activity out of the European Union;
Danes se s pojavom selitve proizvodnje najpogosteje ukvarjamo, kadar posamezen primer v javnosti sproži burne reakcije.
At present, relocation is a problem mostly tackled in the wake of an actual instance of relocation which has stirred up public opinion.
Razširjenost tega pojava ter vpliv, ki ga ima na zaposlovanje in gospodarski razvoj, pa zahtevata bolj splošen razmislek na osnovi preverjenih številčnih podatkov, ki nam bo pomagal oblikovati premišljen odziv.
The extent of the phenomenon and its impact on employment and economic development mean that we need to take a more global approach, on the basis of verified, quantified data, and thus work out a more thought-out response.
Oblikovanje EMU, širitev Evropske unije in krepitev mednarodne trgovine upravičeno zbujajo strah, da bodo povzročile selitev dejavnosti tako znotraj kot izven Unije in evroobmočja.
The completion of EMU, enlargement and the increase in international trade are legitimate sources of concern when it comes to the issue of industrial relocation following in their wake, both within and out of the Union and the eurozone.
Na evroobmočju in v manjši meri v okviru Unije odstopanj pri konkurenčnosti in produktivnosti ni več mogoče začasno popravljati s prilagoditvami deviznih tečajev, zaradi česar imajo razlike v proizvodnih stroških še pomembnejšo vlogo pri izboru lokacije za proizvodnjo ali odločitvi za njeno selitev.
Within the eurozone, and to a lesser extent within the Union, temporary corrections of unsatisfactory competitiveness and productivity levels can no longer be carried out by adjusting exchange rates; this furthermore increases the role played by production costs differentials when companies decide to set up and to relocate.
Nedavni primeri selitev proizvodnje oziroma pritiskov na plače in dolžino delovnega časa, s katerimi naj bi preprečili selitev proizvodnje, so zaznamovali javno mnenje in še toliko bolj prizadete delavce.
Recent instances of relocation or the use of lower salaries and increased working hours supposed to prevent relocation have hit both the headlines and, to an even greater extent, the employees concerned.
Za slednje selitev proizvodnje običajno pomeni izgubo delovnega mesta ali slabše pogoje dela in slabši dohodek.
For the latter, relocation generally means job losses or worsened working and salary conditions.
Za države članice predstavljajo zapiranja podjetij zaradi selitve proizvodnje socialne stroške v obliki nadomestil za brezposelnost in stroškov prekvalifikacije, zato se upravičeno sprašujemo, kako bi lahko evropski strukturni skladi vplivali na odločitve o selitvi proizvodnje.
Insofar as the closure of companies following the relocation constitutes a social cost borne by the Member States in terms of unemployment benefits and staff retraining costs, we have every right to ask ourselves about the impact that the European Structural Funds could bring to bear on any decision to relocate.
Z makroekonomskega vidika ni lahko prepoznati selitev podjetij.
Company relocations are not easily identifiable at macro-economic level.
Da lahko dejansko govorimo o selitvi proizvodnje, kot jo navadno razumemo, se mora istočasno ali vsaj v relativno kratkem razdobju zgoditi:
Relocation, in the sense generally understood, requires the following elements to be present either simultaneously or within a relatively short period of time:
· Zaprtje obrata ali oddelka podjetja
· Closure of a production site or of a company department
· Prenos proizvodnje v drugi obrat istega podjetja, v drugo gospodarsko enoto (regija, država na istem ali na drugem gospodarskem področju).
· Transfer of production to another production site belonging to the same company, located in a different economic entity (region, country belonging to the same or a different economic zone).
Prenos se lahko izvede v že obstoječe prostore ali pa z novimi investicijami, s katerimi ustvarjajo novi obrati.
This transfer may be carried out on the basis of existing installations, or may lead to fresh investment, with the possible establishment of new production sites.
Težko je statistično ugotavljati, kateri postopki zapiranja so povezani s postopki prenosa proizvodnje v drugi obrat istega podjetja.
Statistically, it is difficult to identify what closures are linked to production transfer to another site belonging to the same company.
Dejansko danes v Skupnosti ali v državah Unije nimamo statističnega mehanizma, ki bi lahko podal zanesljive podatke o razširjenosti in posledicah selitve dejavnosti znotraj ali izven Unije.
At present, we do not have the statistical wherewithal, either at Community or Member State level, to provide us with reliable data on the extent and consequences of industrial relocation within or out of the Union.
Vseeno pa lahko v tem trenutku navedemo več študij, ki jih je profesor Robert PLASMAN predstavil članom Komisije in ki prve osvetljujejo posebnosti po regijah in sektorjih, razsežnosti selitev proizvodnje in njihove posledice na gospodarski razvoj in socialno kohezijo v prizadetih regijah.
But we can, however, refer to various studies which have been submitted to the Members of the Commission by Professor Robert PLASMAN, which give us a preliminary insight into the regional and sectoral specifics of relocation, and their extent and impact on economic development and social cohesion in the regions concerned.
V nedavni študiji, posvečeni selitvam industrijskih dejavnosti, sta Patrick AUBERT in Patrick SILLARD ocenila število delovnih mest, ki jih to zadeva
In a recent study of industrial relocation, Patrick AUBERT and Patrick SILLARD measured the number of jobs concerned
Patrick AUBERT in Patrick SILLARD, „Selitve proizvodnje in zmanjšanje števila zaposlenih v francoski industriji“, (april 2005), INSEE. .
Patrick AUBERT and Patrick SILLARD, « Délocalisations et réductions d’effectifs dans l’industrie française » , (April 2005), INSEE. .