natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(9) Pri obravnavi oseb, ki sodijo v okvir te direktive, morajo države članice upoštevati pravna sredstva mednarodnega prava, katerega del so in ki prepoveduje vse oblike diskriminacije.
(9) With respect to the treatment of persons falling within the scope of this Directive, Member States are bound by obligations under instruments of international law to which they are party and which prohibit all forms of discrimination.
Jasno je treba navesti, da so pri uporabi direktive prepovedane vse oblike diskriminacije.
It needs to be stated explicitly that all forms of discrimination are prohibited in the application of the Directive.
(11) V interesu držav članic in prosilcev za azil je, da se odločitve glede prošenj za azil sprejmejo takoj, ko je mogoče.
(11) It is in the interest of both Member States and applicants for asylum to decide as soon as possible on applications for asylum.
Države članice obravnavo prošenj za azil organizirajo po lastni presoji, tako da lahko v skladu z nacionalnimi potrebami in ob upoštevanju standardov te direktive dajo prednost posamezni prošnji ali pospešijo postopek v zvezi njo.
The organisation of the processing of applications for asylum is left to the discretion of Member States, so that they may, in accordance with their national needs, prioritise or accelerate the processing of any application, taking into account the standards in this Directive.
(11) V interesu držav članic in prosilcev za azil je, da se odločitve glede prošenj za azil sprejmejo takoj, ko je mogoče , ter da morajo biti zato vzpostavljeni hitri in učinkoviti postopki, ki ne smejo trajati dlje kot 6 mesecev .
(11) It is in the interest of both Member States and applicants for asylum to decide as soon as possible on applications for asylum , and there therefore need to be fast and efficient procedures which should not take longer than 6 months .
Bistveni so hitri in učinkoviti postopki.
Fast and effective procedures are crucial.
Glede na zelo velike razlike v časovnih obdobjih med državami članicami je nujno, da se vzpostavi skupno povprečje, ker bodo tako nastali pravičnejši pogoji za prosilce za azil in države članice v zvezi s pravično delitvijo odgovornosti.
Given the enormous variations in time-periods between Member States, it is essential to establish a common average, since this will create fairer conditions for both asylum seekers and the Member States in terms of an equitable division of responsibilities.
(13) Da bi lahko pravilno določili, katere osebe potrebujejo zaščito kot begunci v skladu s členom 1 Ženevske konvencije, mora imeti vsak prosilec , razen nekaterih izjem, razpoložljiv dostop do postopkov, možnost sodelovanja in ustreznega stika s pristojnimi organi, da lahko predstavi vsa pomembna dejstva v zvezi s svojim primerom, ter zadostna postopkovna jamstva, da lahko brani svoj primer v vseh fazah postopka.
(13) In the interests of a correct recognition of those persons in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the Geneva Convention, every applicant should, subject to certain exceptions, have an effective access to procedures, the opportunity to co-operate and properly communicate with the competent authorities so as to present the relevant facts of his/her case and sufficient procedural guarantees to pursue his/her case at and throughout all stages of the procedure.
Razen tega naj bi se v postopku obravnave posamezne prošnje za azil prosilcu zagotovila vsaj pravica do bivanja na ozemlju države v času, ko čaka na odločitev organa za presojo, dostop do storitev tolmačenja pri predstavitvi svojega primera na morebitnem razgovoru s pristojnimi organi, možnost stika s predstavnikom Visokega komisariata za begunce pri Organizaciji združenih narodov (UNHCR) ali s katero drugo organizacijo, ki deluje v imenu UNHCR, pravica do ustreznega obveščanja o odločitvi ter njeni dejanski in pravni utemeljitvi, možnost posveta s pravnim ali drugim svetovalcem in v odločilnih fazah postopka pravica do obveščenosti glede njegovega pravnega položaja v jeziku, za katerega se lahko upravičeno domneva, da je zanj razumljiv .
Moreover, the procedure in which an application for asylum is examined should normally provide an applicant at least with a right to stay pending a decision by the determining authority, access to the services of an interpreter for submitting his/her case if interviewed by the authorities, the opportunity to communicate with a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or with any organisation working on its behalf, the right to appropriate notification of a decision, a motivation of that decision in fact and in law, the opportunity to consult a legal adviser or other counsellor, and the right to be informed of his/her legal position at decisive moments in the course of the procedure, in a language he/she can reasonably be supposed to understand .
(13) Da bi lahko pravilno določili, katere osebe potrebujejo zaščito kot begunci v skladu s členom 1 Ženevske konvencije, mora imeti vsak prosilec razpoložljiv dostop do postopkov, možnost sodelovanja in ustreznega stika s pristojnimi organi, da lahko predstavi vsa pomembna dejstva v zvezi s svojim primerom, ter postopkovna jamstva, da lahko brani svoj primer v vseh fazah postopka.
(13) In the interests of a correct recognition of those persons in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the Geneva Convention, every applicant should, have an effective access to procedures, the opportunity to co-operate and properly communicate with the competent authorities so as to present the relevant facts of his/her case and procedural guarantees to pursue his/her case at and throughout all stages of the procedure.
Razen tega naj bi se v postopku obravnave posamezne prošnje za azil prosilcu zagotovila vsaj pravica do bivanja na ozemlju države v času, ko čaka na odločitev organa za presojo, dostop do storitev tolmačenja pri predstavitvi svojega primera na morebitnem razgovoru s pristojnimi organi, možnost stika s predstavnikom Visokega komisariata za begunce pri Organizaciji združenih narodov (UNHCR) ali s katero drugo organizacijo, ki deluje v imenu UNHCR, pravica do ustreznega obveščanja o odločitvi ter njeni dejanski in pravni utemeljitvi, možnost posveta s pravnim ali drugim svetovalcem in v odločilnih fazah postopka pravica do obveščenosti glede njegovega pravnega položaja v jeziku, ki ga razume .
Moreover, the procedure in which an application for asylum is examined should provide an applicant at least with a right to stay pending a decision by the determining authority, access to the services of an interpreter for submitting his/her case if interviewed by the authorities, the opportunity to communicate with a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or with any organisation working on its behalf, the right to appropriate notification of a decision, a motivation of that decision in fact and in law, the opportunity to consult a legal adviser or other counsellor, and the right to be informed of his/her legal position at decisive moments in the course of the procedure, in a language he/she understands .
(„Se lahko upravičeno domneva“ je črtano v celotnem besedilu.
(The deletion of "can reasonably be supposed to" applies throughout the text.
Sprejetje te spremembe bo zahtevalo ustrezne popravke v celotnem besedilu.)
Adopting this amendment will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Vedno je treba upoštevati načela učinkovitega pravnega sredstva.
The principles of effective remedy should always apply.
Prosilci za azil bi morali biti obveščeni v jeziku, ki ga razumejo, ne pa v jeziku, za katerega se lahko upravičeno domneva, da je zanje razumljiv.
Asylum seekers should be informed in a language that they understand, not in a language they may reasonably be supposed to understand.
(14) Poleg tega je treba določiti tudi posebna postopkovna jamstva za mladoletne osebe brez spremstva, ki so še posebej ranljive.
(14) In addition, specific procedural guarantees for unaccompanied minors should be laid down, because of their vulnerability.
V tem smislu je najpomembnejša naloga držav članic delovati v interesu otroka.
In this context, the best interests of the child should be a primary consideration of Member States.
(14) Poleg tega je treba določiti tudi posebna postopkovna jamstva za otroke brez spremstva, ki so še posebej ranljivi.
(14) In addition, specific procedural guarantees for unaccompanied children should be laid down, because of their vulnerability.
V tem smislu je najpomembnejša naloga držav članic delovati v interesu otroka skozi ves azilni postopek, v skladu s členom 3 Konvencije ZN o otrokovih pravicah (CRC) .
In this context, the best interests of the child should be a primary consideration of Member States throughout the whole asylum procedure, consistent with Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) .
V skladu s terminologijo Konvencije ZN o otrokovih pravicah je bolje uporabljati izraz „otrok“ kot „mladoletna oseba“.
It is better to use the term "child" instead of "minor", in line with the terminology of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
(16) Številne prošnje za azil so vložene na meji ali na tranzitnem območju države članice, preden je sprejeta odločitev glede vstopa prosilca.
(16) Many asylum applications are made at the border or in a transit zone of a Member State prior to a decision on the entry of the applicant.
Državam članicam je treba omogočiti, da ohranijo obstoječe postopke, prilagojene posebnemu položaju teh prosilcev na meji.
Member States should be able to keep existing procedures adapted to the specific situation of these applicants at the border.
Treba je določiti splošna pravila v zvezi z možnimi izjemami v teh okoliščinah glede jamstev, do katerih imajo prosilci pravico v normalnih razmerah .
Common rules should be defined on possible exceptions made in these circumstances to the guarantees normally enjoyed by applicants .
Postopki na meji naj bi se uporabljali v glavnem za tiste prosilce, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za vstop na ozemlje države članice.
Border procedures should mainly apply to those applicants who do not meet the conditions for entry into the territory of the Member States.
Načelo nediskriminacije zahteva, da vsi prosilci za azil, ne glede na to, ali za azil zaprosijo na meji ali znotraj države, koristijo ista osnovna načela in ugodnosti.
The principle of non-discrimination requires that all asylum-seeker, irrespective of whether they apply at the border or inside the country, benefit from the same basic principles and guarantees.
Nobenega razloga ni, da so zahteve primernega zakonitega postopka za primere, ko so prošnje za azil predložene na meji, manjše od zahtev za primere, ko so prošnje predložene znotraj ozemlja.
Here is no reason for requirements of due process of law in asylum cases submitted at the border to be less than for those submitted within the territory.
(17a) Ob priznavanju obstoja trgovine z ljudmi in ob upoštevanju interesov prosilcev azila, ta zaradi vstop v državo članico na tak način ne sme biti nikakor diskriminiran pri prošnji.
(17a) Acknowledging the existence of trafficking in human beings and having regard to the best interests of the asylum applicant, he/she must not be discriminated against in any way in his/her application for having entered the Member State in such a manner.
Trgovanje je ena izmed glavnih možnosti prosilcev, da pridejo do meja držav članic.
Trafficking is one of the main avenues for applicants to reach Member State borders by.
Kljub temu se prosilca zaradi tega, ker je uporabil edino možnost za pobeg pred pregonom, ne sme kaznovati.
However, the applicant should not be penalised for having used the only resource he could to flee from persecution.
(18) Ob doseženi uskladitvi pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva, da so upravičeni do statusa begunca, je treba določiti skupne kriterije , po katerih se posamezne tretje države označijo za varne izvorne države.
(18) Given the level of harmonisation achieved on the qualification of third country nationals and stateless persons as refugees, common criteria for designating third countries as safe countries of origin should be established.
(18) Ob doseženi uskladitvi pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva, da so upravičeni do statusa begunca, je treba določiti skupna merila , po katerih se posamezne tretje države označijo za varne izvorne države , ter zagotoviti pravilno in učinkovito ocenjevanje in izvajanje .
(18) Given the level of harmonisation achieved on the qualification of third country nationals and stateless persons as refugees, common criteria for designating third countries as safe countries of origin should be established and it must be ensured that evaluation and implementation are carried out correctly and efficiently .
Optimum results will only be achieved on the basis of proper implementation
Optimum results will only be achieved on the basis of proper implementation.
(19) Če Svet oceni, da je v zvezi s posamezno izvorno državo omenjenim kriterijem zadoščeno in jo posledično uvrsti na minimalno skupno listo varnih izvornih držav, ki se določi v skladu s to direktivo, je treba zagotoviti, da bodo države članice obravnavale prošnje oseb, ki imajo državljanstvo te države, ali osebe brez državljanstva, ki so stalno bivale v tej državi, na osnovi ovrgljive domneve o varnosti te države.
(19) Where the Council has satisfied itself that those criteria are met in relation to a particular country of origin, and has consequently included it in the minimum common list of safe countries of origin to be adopted pursuant to this Directive, Member States should be obliged to consider applications of persons with the nationality of that country, or of stateless persons formerly habitually resident in that country, on the basis of the rebuttable presumption of the safety of that country.
Zaradi političnega pomena opredelitve varnih izvornih držav, še posebej glede posledic ocene spoštovanja človekovih pravic v izvorni državi in njenega vpliva na politiko Evropske unije na področju zunanjih zadev, Svet vsako odločitev o oblikovanju in spremembi seznama sprejme po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom .
In the light of the political importance of the designation of safe countries of origin, in particular in view of the implications of an assessment of the human rights situation in a country of origin and its implications for the policies of the European Union in the field of external relations, the Council should take any decisions on the establishment or amendment of the list , after consultation of the European Parliament .
(19) Če Svet oceni, da je v zvezi s posamezno izvorno državo omenjenim kriterijem zadoščeno in jo posledično uvrsti na skupno listo varnih izvornih držav, ki se določi v skladu s to direktivo, lahko države članice obravnavajo prošnje oseb, ki imajo državljanstvo te države, ali osebe brez državljanstva, ki so stalno bivale v tej državi, na osnovi ovrgljive domneve o varnosti te države.
(19) Where the Council has satisfied itself that those criteria are met in relation to a particular country of origin, and has consequently included it in the common list of safe countries of origin to be adopted pursuant to this Directive, Member States may consider applications of persons with the nationality of that country, or of stateless persons formerly habitually resident in that country, on the basis of the rebuttable presumption of the safety of that country.
Zaradi političnega pomena opredelitve varnih izvornih držav, še posebej glede posledic ocene spoštovanja človekovih pravic v izvorni državi in njenega vpliva na politiko Evropske unije na področju zunanjih zadev, Svet vsako odločitev o oblikovanju in spremembi seznama sprejme v postopku soodločanju z Evropskim parlamentom .
In the light of the political importance of the designation of safe countries of origin, in particular in view of the implications of an assessment of the human rights situation in a country of origin and its implications for the policies of the European Union in the field of external relations, the Council , in co-decision with the European Parliament, should take any decisions on the establishment or amendment of the list.
Poročevalec meni, da države članice, ki nimajo seznama varnih držav, niso obvezane, da ga sprejmejo.
The Rapporteur considers that the Member States who have not a list on safe countries should not be obliged to adopt it.
Razen tega mora biti skupni seznam na evropski ravni edini dovoljen seznam, kar ne bi dovoljevalo, da imajo države članice svoje sezname.
Moreover the common list at European level should be the only list allowed, not a minimum one allowing Member States to have national lists.
O seznamu, ki ne bo uveden s to direktivo, ampak s prihodnjim zakonodajnim aktom, soodločata Svet in Evropski parlament.
The list, which will be established not by this Directive, but by a further legislative act, shall be agreed in co-decision by the Council and the European Parliament.
Glede na Pogodbo ES (člen 67-§5, prva alinea) se uporabljeni postopek, po katerem Svet sprejme zakonodajo o skupnih pravilih in osnovnih načelih o azilu, šteje za postopek soodločanja.
In fact, according to the EC Treaty (article 67-§5, first indent), once the Council has adopted the legislation defining the common rules and basic principles on asylum, the procedure to apply is the co-decision one.
(20) Ker imata Bolgarija in Romunija status držav kandidatk za pristop k Evropski uniji in sta dosegli določen napredek na tem področju, ju je za namene te direktive do njunega pristopa k Evropski uniji treba obravnavati kot varni izvorni državi.
(20) It results from the status of Bulgaria and Romania as candidate countries for the accession to the European Union and the progress made by these countries for membership that they should be regarded as constituting safe countries of origin for the purposes of this Directive until the date of their accession to the European Union.
Prezgodaj je šteti Romunijo in Bolgarijo za varni izvorni državi.
It is premature to consider Romania and Bulgaria safe country of origin.
Kljub sprejetju določb o azilu še vedno obstajajo pomanjkljivosti v zakonodaji in izvajanju.
Despite the adoption of asylum provisions, there are still shortcomings in the legislation and in the implementation.
(21) Označitev tretje države kot varne izvorne države za namene te direktive ne predstavlja absolutnega jamstva za varnost državljanov te države.
(21) The designation of a third country as a safe country of origin for the purposes of this Directive cannot establish an absolute guarantee of safety for nationals of that country.
Ocena, na kateri temelji takšna označitev, lahko že zaradi svoje narave upošteva le splošne državljanske, pravne in politične okoliščine v tej državi ter to, ali so v zadevni državi nosilci preganjanja, mučenja in tisti, ki nehumano ali ponižujoče ravnajo z drugimi ali jih na ta način kaznujejo, kadar so spoznani za krive, tudi v resnici podvrženi sankcijam.
By its very nature, the assessment underlying the designation can only take into account the general civil, legal and political circumstances in that country and whether actors of persecution, torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are subject to sanction in practice when found liable in the country concerned.
Zato je pomembno, da v primeru, ko prosilec dokaže, da v njegovih posebnih okoliščinah obstajajo resni razlogi zoper obravnavanje države kot varne, zanj opredelitev te države kot varne ne velja več.
For this reason, it is important that, where an applicant shows that there are serious reasons to consider the country not to be safe in his/her particular circumstances, the designation of the country as safe can no longer be considered relevant for him/her.
Ocena, na kateri temelji takšna označitev, lahko že zaradi svoje narave upošteva le splošne državljanske, pravne in politične okoliščine v tej državi , vključno z upoštevanjem pravil mednarodnega prava na področju človekovih pravic, temeljnih svoboščin in zaščite beguncev, ter to, ali so v zadevni državi nosilci preganjanja, mučenja in tisti, ki nehumano ali ponižujoče ravnajo z drugimi ali jih na ta način kaznujejo, kadar so spoznani za krive, tudi v resnici podvrženi sankcijam.
By its very nature, the assessment underlying the designation can only take into account the general civil, legal and political circumstances in that country , including adherence to the rules of international law on human rights, fundamental freedoms and refugee protection, and whether actors of persecution, torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are subject to sanction in practice when found liable in the country concerned.
(22) Države članice vsebinsko preverijo vse prošnje, tj. ocenijo, če zadevni prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje za priznanje statusa begunca v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2004/83/ES o minimalnih standardih za izpolnjevanje pogojev in status begunca državljanom tretjih držav ali osebam brez državljanstva ali osebam, ki sicer potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito in vsebino zagotovljene zaščite , razen ko ta direktiva predvideva drugačno obravnavo, še zlasti kadar se lahko upravičeno predvideva , da bo zadevo preučila ali zadostno zaščito zagotovila druga država.
(22) Member States should examine all applications on the substance, i.e. assess whether the applicant in question qualifies as a refugee in accordance with Council Directive 2004/83/EC on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, except where this Directive provides otherwise, in particular where it can be reasonably assumed that another country would do the examination or provide sufficient protection.
Predvsem pa državam članicam ne more biti naložena obveznost vsebinsko obravnavati prošnje za azil, če je pred tem druga država prosilcu že dodelila status begunca ali mu nudila ustrezno varstvo in bo prosilec ponovno sprejet v to državo.
Especially, Member States should not be obliged to assess the substance of an asylum application where a first country of asylum has granted the applicant refugee status or otherwise sufficient protection and the applicant will be readmitted to this country.
(22) Države članice vsebinsko preverijo vse prošnje, tj. ocenijo, ali zadevni prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje za priznanje statusa begunca v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2004/83/ES o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite , razen če je ugotovljeno, da lahko zadevo preuči in lahko zagotovi enakovredno in ustrezno zaščito druga država v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 343/2003 za dne 18. februarja 2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države* .
(22) Member States should examine all applications on the substance, i.e. assess whether the applicant in question qualifies as a refugee in accordance with Council Directive 2004/83/EC on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, except where it is established that another country is competent to do the examination and can provide effective, equivalent and adequate protection in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national*.
* UL L 50, 25.2.2003, str.
* OJ L 50, 25.02.2003, p.