natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
24. ugotavlja, da lahko Parlament v skladu s členom 230 Pogodbe ES primere kršitev pogodbe ali katerega koli zakona, vezanega na njeno uporabo, predloži Sodišču;
Notes that Article 230 of the Treaty enables the Parliament to refer to the Court of Justice cases of violation of the Treaty or any other rule of law related to its application;
27. poziva pristojni odbor, naj v tesnem sodelovanju z Odborom za peticije izvede revizijo veljavnih pravil za postopek vlaganja peticij, da bi bolj upoštevali sedanjo najboljšo prakso in okrepili postopke, povezane z varovanjem podatkov in zaupnostjo, ne da bi pri tem ogrozili ustrezno preglednost postopka za vlaganje peticij;
Calls upon the responsible committee, in close cooperation with the Committee on Petitions, to conduct a review of the current rules of procedure of the petitions procedure in order to bring it more into line with current best practice and reinforce procedures related to data protection and confidentiality without undermining the essential transparency of the petitions process itself;
To poročilo obravnava obdobje od marca 2004 do decembra 2005 in je bilo sestavljeno v skladu s členom 192 poslovnika, na podlagi katerega mora Obor za peticije o svojih odločitvah obveščati Parlament.
The current report covers the period from March 2004 to December 2005 and has been drawn up pursuant to Rule 192 of the Rules of Procedure requiring the Committee on Petitions to inform Parliament of the outcome of its deliberations.
Obdobje, obravnavano v poročilu, je bilo izjemoma podaljšano, kar je odboru omogočilo, da pripravi celovitejši pregled nad svojim delom v letu in pol po širitvi EU in zadnjih evropskih parlamentarnih volitvah.
Exceptionally, the normal period covered by the report has been extended, allowing the Committee to provide a more comprehensive image of its activity one year and a half after the EU enlargement and the last European parliamentary elections.
Poleg tega so se s tem popravile nepravilnosti pri predstavitvi postopka za vlaganje peticij, saj se prihodnja poročila ne bodo več sklicevala na 'parlamentarno leto', temveč na koledarsko leto, ki natančno sovpada s številčenjem vloženih peticij.
Moreover, this decision allows us to rectify an anomaly in the presentation of the petitions process by correcting, for future reports, the year under review from 'parliamentary year' to calendar year - the latter corresponding precisely with the numbering of petitions received.
Pri opravljanju svojih obveznosti v tem obdobju se je Obor za peticije neprestano prizadeval okrepiti svojo vlogo neposrednega komunikacijskega kanala med evropskimi državljani in njihovimi predstavniki ter spodbujal reševanje vprašanj in težav državljanov, zlasti v zvezi z izvajanjem prava in politik EU.
Through its activity during this period, the Committee on Petitions has constantly worked to reinforce its role as a channel for direct contact between European citizens and their representatives and enhanced its efforts to address citizens' immediate concerns and difficulties encountered, especially in relation to the application of the EU law and policies.
Vloženega je bilo veliko truda, da bi se izboljšali postopki in zmanjšale zamude pri obravnavi vloženih peticij.
Efforts have been made to improve the procedures and to shorten the delays in addressing petitions.
Sekretariat odbora in druge pristojne službe so vložili veliko dela za vnos podatkov v novi sistem in njegovo neprestano posodabljanje, kar mu omogoča, da je v celoti operativen.
Supplying the new system with the necessary data to make it fully operational as well as the need to permanently update has required a serious effort on the part of the Committee's Secretariat and the other services concerned.
Razvija se torej nova faza, ki naj bi prinesla dodatne koristi in hkrati poenostavila potek dela s pomočjo znanja, pridobljenega z uporabo sistema.
A new phase is currently being developed which should provide additional benefits while simplifying the work-flow element based upon experience acquired while working with the system.
Po drugi strani je odbor razširil svojo običajno vlogo obveščanja Komisije o domnevnih kršitvah, kjer je bilo to mogoče, in pri tem večjo pozornost posvetil spremljanju postopkov.
On the other hand, the Committee has expanded, where possible, its traditional role of bringing alleged infringements to the attention of the European Commission by paying an increased level of attention to the follow up process.
Sodelovanje Evropske komisije in Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi s tem ostaja temeljni element tega postopka, vendar bi se lahko še izboljšalo, zlasti če bi Komisija v svojem letnem poročilu jasneje priznala pomen peticij za ugotavljanje kršitev pri izvajanju zakonodaje EU.
Cooperation between the European Commission and the European Parliament in this respect remains a fundamental feature of the process but it could be further improved, especially in terms of a clearer recognition being given by the Commission, in its annual report, of the importance of petitions in detecting breaches in the application of EU laws in the first place.
S tem bi se posamezni državljani zavedali, da se njihove skrbi obravnavajo in da pristojne oblasti na evropski ravni zanje sprejemajo ustrezne ukrepe ter da Evropski parlament v celoti upošteva njihove nezadovoljstvo glede neustrezne zakonodaje EU ali neustreznega izvajanja zakonov v državah članicah.
Such recognition could also demonstrate more clearly to individual citizens that their concerns were being addressed and acted upon by responsible authorities at European level, and that their frustrations related to inadequate EU legislation, or improper application of laws by Member States, were fully taken on board by the European Parliament.
Uvedba jasnega postopka, s katerim bi Parlament lahko začenjal postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev proti državam članicam, bi pomenila korak v pravo smer in morda celo pogoj sine qua non za utrditev zaupanja državljanov v parlamentarno prakso na evropski ravni.
The establishment of a clear procedure creating a Parliamentary role leading to the launching of the infringement procedures against member states would be an important step in the right direction, indeed it may even be a sine qua non for embedding citizens' confidence in parliamentary practice at European level.
Odbor je prepričan, da za veliko večino vlagateljev peticij, če ne celo za vse, postopki ugotavljanja kršitev, ki temeljijo na diskrecijski odločitvi Evropske komisije, vlagateljem peticij še zdaleč ne zagotavljajo ustreznih pravnih sredstev, do katerih so v številnih primerih upravičeni.
The Committee is convinced that for the vast majority, if not all petitioners, infringement procedures which are triggered by a discretionary decision of the European Commission fall far short of providing them with the proper redress which they clearly deserve in many cases.
Evropski državljani potrebujejo jasnejše načine pridobivanja izvensodnih sredstev in namen Odbora za peticije je, da poišče predloge v zvezi s tem.
Clearer means of obtaining non-judicial remedies are also required for European citizens and the Petitions Committee is aiming to come forward with proposals in this respect.
Širitev EU na deset novih držav članic je močno vplivala na delo odbora v tem obdobju kot tudi na delo celotnega Parlamenta.
The enlargement of the EU with ten new member states considerably influenced the work of the Committee throughout this period, as it did for the European Parliament in general.
Da bi državljani novih držav članic lahko v celoti in enakovredno uživali pravico do naslavljanja peticij na Evropski parlament, so bile uvedene kadrovske in logistične spremembe.
Adjustments in terms of staff and logistics were done in order to enable citizens in the new member states to fully and equally benefit from their right to petition the European Parliament.
Treba pa je vseeno opozoriti, da se po širitvi EU število vloženih peticij ni sorazmerno povečalo.
However, it is important to note that the period following EU enlargement has not brought a corresponding increase in the number of petitions received.
Statistika kaže, da so iz novih držav članic Poljaki, Madžari in Čehi vložili največ peticij, vendar število prejetih peticij ostaja relativno majhno, kar pomeni, da je treba državljane teh držav bolje seznaniti s pravico do naslavljanja peticij na Evropski parlament ter da je treba državljane o tej pravici bolje obveščati tako na evropski kot nacionalni ravni.
According to statistics, Polish, Hungarian and Czechs were among the most active petitioners from the new member countries, but the number of petitions received remain quite small, indicating that citizens in these states need to become more acquainted with their right to petition the European Parliament and that additional effort should be made both at European and national level to inform them about this right.
Istočasno je treba omeniti, da tudi med 'starimi' državami članicami število prejetih peticij nikakor ni sorazmerno s številom prebivalcev.
At the same time it must be pointed out that even amongst the 'previous' member states, the number of petitions received is in no way proportional to population size.
Vlaganje peticij v nekaterih državah članicah, tako s strani posameznikov kot vse pogosteje s strani združenj državljanov, je pogosto navidezno povezano s širšimi kulturno-političnimi tradicijami.
Petitioning in some member states, both by individuals and increasingly by citizens' associations is often apparently related to broader based political and cultural traditions.
Iz držav, v katerih je tovrstna tradicija ukoreninjena na nacionalni ravni, kot denimo v Španiji (prek varuha človekovih pravic Defensor del Pueblo in regionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic), Nemčiji (prek odborov za peticije zveznega zbora Bundestaga in deželnega zbora Landtaga ali Grčiji, prihaja več izčrpnih peticij kot denimo iz Francije ali Velike Britanije.
More detailed petitions are received, for example, from countries were the tradition is entrenched nationally, such as in Spain (via the Defensor del Pueblo and regional ombudsmen), or Germany (via the Bundestag and LandTag petitions committees) or Greece, than from France or the UK.
Pravica do vlaganja peticij
Right to table petitions
Člena 21 in 194 Pogodbe ES določata, da pravica do peticije dovoljuje vsakemu evropskemu državljanu ali vsaki fizični oziroma pravni osebi s stalnim prebivališčem ali registriranim sedežem v državi članici, da na Evropski parlament naslovi peticijo o zadevi, ki sodi na področje delovanja EU.
As enshrined in the EC Treaty under articles 21 and 194, the right to petition enables any European Union citizen, any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State to address the European Parliament on matters falling within the EU’s fields of activity.
Peticije se vlagajo brezplačno, in sicer v pisni obliki in v katerem koli uradnem jeziku EU.
Tabling petitions is free of any charge to the petitioner and can be done in writing, in any of the EU official languages.
Poslovnik Evropskega parlamenta še dodatno poudarja to pravico, ki je zasnovana kot povezava med državljani in njihovimi predstavniki na ravni Skupnosti in zagotavlja možnost pri oblikovanju in vplivanju na postopek sprejemanja političnih odločitev.
The Rules of Procedures of the European Parliament further emphasise this right, conceived as a link between citizens and their representatives at EU level as well as a guarantee of the possibility to shape and influence the political decision-making process.
Vsebina tega zagotovila je na široko opisana v poslovniku Evropskega parlamenta, ki jasno določa, da peticije niso omejene na zadeve, povezane s pristojnostmi Skupnosti, temveč se lahko sklicujejo na zadeve, ki sodijo na katero koli področje delovanja Unije.
The substance of this guarantee is widely drawn in the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, which expressly state that petitions are not restricted to matters related to the Community's competences, but can refer to matters falling within all the fields of activity of the Union.
Od konca junija 2004 do konca decembra 2005 je bilo na Parlament naslovljenih 1609 peticij.
Between the end of June 2004 and the end of December 2005, the Parliament received 1609 petitions.
Približno tretjina prejetih peticij je bila označena za nesprejemljive , ker niso sodile na področje delovanja EU, in ne ker se odbor z njihovo vsebino ne bi strinjal!
Around one third of the petitions received were declared inadmissible , as they fell outside the area of activity of the EU and not because the Committee 'did not agree' with them!
Na podoben način je treba poudariti, da je peticija označena za sprejemljivo, če je v skladu z določbami iz člena 191(1), in ne ker bi se odbor z njeno vsebino strinjal.
In the same way, it may also be helpful to point out that a petition is declared admissible when it is in conformity with the provisions of Rule 191, paragraph 1, and again, not because the Committee agrees with it.
Peticije so vsekakor dragocen vir informacij o izvajanju evropske zakonodaje, saj pogosto opozarjajo na pomanjkljivosti in težave pri procesu izvajanja, s katerimi se soočajo evropski državljani.
Of course, petitions represent a valuable source of information concerning the application of the European legislation, often revealing shortcomings and difficulties in the implementation process as perceived by ordinary European citizens.
Glede na to, da so v boljšem položaju, da na nacionalni ravni spremljajo izvajanje zakonodaje EU, peticije navadno predstavljajo sredstvo dejanskega vpogleda v to, v kakšni meri se uresničuje cilje EU.
As they are the best placed to monitor the implementation of the EU legislation at national level, petitions usually provide a reality check tool of the extent to which EU objectives achieve their target.
Po drugi strani pa pogosto nakazujejo na področja, na katerih je potrebno ukrepanje EU, da se podpre ali uskladi prizadevanja nacionalnih organov, da se odpravijo pravne praznine (npr. biotehnologija).
On the other hand, they often point out to areas where EU action is needed in order to assist or coordonate the efforts of the national authorities to overcome normative voids (e.g. biotechnology).
Veliko peticij, prejetih v obravnavanem obdobju, izraža mnenja državljanov o dejavnostih EU.
Many of the petitions received during the period of reference expressed citizens' views or opinions about EU activities.
Zato ni presenetljivo, da se številne nanašajo na morebitno širitev EU na Turčijo in Balkan. others about the situation in the Middle East.
Not surprisingly several have been received on the subject of the eventual enlargement of the EU to Turkey and the Balkans; others about the situation in the Middle East.
Takih peticij ponavadi ne obravnava Odbor za peticije, ampak se posredujejo odborom Parlamenta, pristojnim za zunanje zadeve, ali posebnim delegacijam, pristojnim za odnose s tretjimi državami.
By and large, such petitions are not debated in the Petitions Committee itself but forward to Parliament's competent committees dealing with foreign relations, or to specific delegations with third country responsibility.
Precejšnje število peticij opozarja na težave pri izvajanju veljavnih direktiv ES, zlasti o okolju, socialni varnosti, priznavanju diplom in drugih vidikov, povezanih z delovanjem notranjega trga.
An important number of petitions point to the difficulties related to the implementations of existing EC directives, mostly in the fields of environment, social security, recognition of diplomas, and other aspects related to the functioning of the internal market.
Peticije običajno izpostavljajo težave državljanov, do katerih prihaja zaradi prenosa zakonodaje EU na nacionalno raven, pa tudi zaradi napačne razlage pristojnosti EU.
They usually reveal difficulties encountered by the European citizens in matters related to the way the EU legislation is transposed at national level, but also misinterpretation of the EU responsibilities.
V luči vsega tega je Odbor za peticije pozdravil pobudo Komisije o pomoči državam članicam pri prenosu posebej zahtevnih direktiv prek raznih seminarjev, smernic in razlagalnih besedil.
Against this background, the Committee on Petitions has welcomed the Commission's initiatives to assist Member States in the transposition of particular difficult Directives, by organising seminars and issuing guidelines and interpretative texts.
Kljub temu bi si morale vse pristojne evropske institucije in še posebej Komisija več prizadevati za pripravo nove, državljanom prijaznejše zakonodaje, s čimer bi postali cilji EU javnosti razumljivejši.
Nonetheless, additional effort should be made, by all European institutions concerned and the Commission, in particular, on drafting new legislation in a more citizen-friendly manner in order to help increase the public comprehension of the EU aims and objectives.
Statistike, med drugim tudi tiste, priložene temu poročilu, na splošno kažejo na nenehno potrebo po širjenju javne ozaveščenosti in po učinkovitejšem seznanjanju evropskih državljanov z zakonodajo in politikami EU ter njihovo legitimno pravico do naslavljanja peticij na Evropski parlament.
Statistics, such as those contained in the annexe to this report, indicate generally a continuous need to raise public awareness and better inform European citizens about EU legislation and policies, as well as about their legitimate right to petition the European Parliament.
Za dosego teh ciljev je potrebno skupno prizadevanje tako na evropski kot nacionalni ravni.
A concerted effort at both European and national level is required in order to reach this objective.
Odbor za peticije in Evropski varuh človekovih pravic
Committee on Petitions and the European Ombudsman
Odbor za peticije izvaja parlamentarni nadzor nad delom evropskega varuha človekovih pravic in ohranja konstruktivni delovni odnos z njegovo pisarno, da zagotovi spoštovanje pravic evropskih državljanov na upravni ravni ter skladnost evropskih institucij in teles z najvišjimi upravnimi standardi.
The Committee on Petitions exercises parliamentary oversight of the activities of European Ombudsman and continues to develop a constructive working relation with his office with a view to ensuring that European citizens' rights are respected at administrative level and that the EU institutions and bodies conform to the highest standards of administration.
Eden glavnih izzivov odbora in varuha človekovih pravic je, da državljane bolje seznanita s svojimi različnimi pristojnostmi.
One major challenge both for the Committee and the Ombudsman is to better inform citizens about the difference in competence of the two bodies.
Varuh človekovih pravic je pojasnil, da se velika večina pritožb, naslovljenih na njegovo pisarno, nanaša na zadeve, ki niso v njegovi pristojnosti, kar pomeni, da jih mora posredovati ostalim organom, pogosto nacionalnim, ali celo Odboru za peticije.
As the Ombudsman has admitted, the vast majority of complaints his office receives cover matters for which it is not competent, which obliges the Ombudsman to forward such matters to other, often national bodies - or to the Petitions Committee itself.
Leta 2005 se je začel drugi mandat sedanjega varuha človekovih pravic, Nikiforosa Diamandourosa, ob njegovi ponovni izvolitvi, za katero je pristojen Odbor za peticije, tega leta pa je bila tudi deseta obletnica ustanovitve tega organa.
2005 marked both the beginning of the second mandate of the current Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros by his re-election (under the responsibility of the Petitions Committee), as well as the tenth anniversary of the establishment of this body.
Odbor za peticije je 10. maja 2005 Parlamentu v Strasbourgu predstavil poročilo o delu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
The report on the activity of the European Ombudsman was presented by the Committee on Petitions to the European Parliament on 10 May 2005, in Strasbourg.
V obravnavanem obdobju je evropski varuh človekovih pravic Odboru za peticije predstavil vrsto posebnih poročil, ki jih je pripravil na podlagi lastnih preiskav.
In the period under review, European Ombudsman presented to the Petitions Committee a number of special reports, resulting from his own investigations.
Preiskave so v teku in na plenarnem zasedanju naj bi bilo predstavljeno poročilo o treh primerih.
Work is continuing on these with a view to presenting a report to plenary on three of them.
Ti pokrivajo naslednje teme:
They cover the following subjects;
· pritožbo 1857/2003/GG, ki jo bo predstavil predstavnik Komisije za tisk in informiranje in za katero se je odbor odločil, da ne bo pripravil poročila, ampak bo o njej izrazil mnenje v letnem poročilu dela varuha človekovih pravic;
· Complaint 1857/2003/GG by a Commission Press and Information Officer - on which the Committee decided not to draft a report but to comment in the Annual Report on the Ombudsman's activities;
· pritožbo 2485/2004/GG zaradi priporočil evropskemu uradu za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF), za katero konferenca predsednikov ni dovolila, da se pripravi poročilo, češ da je treba počakati na zaslišanje, ki naj bi se ga udeležila generalni direktor OLAF in varuh človekovih pravic;
· Complaint 2485/2004/GG concerning recommendations to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - for which authorisation to draw up a report was not granted by the Conference of Presidents pending the organisation of a 'hearing' involving the Director General of OLAF and the Ombudsman;
· pritožbo očeta 1391/2002/JMA zaradi domnevne zavrnitve hčerke s posebnimi potrebami v evropskih šolah (poročevalec: Proinsias de Rossa);
· Complaint 1391/2002/JMA concerning the alleged failure of the European Schools to cater for special educational needs of the complainants' daughter; (Rapporteur, Proinsias de Rossa)
· pritožbo 2395/2003/GG o tem, ali naj bodo zakonodajna zasedanja Sveta javna ali ne (poročevalec: David Hammerstein).
· Complaint 2395/2003/GG concerning whether the Council should meet publicly when it acts in its legislative capacity; (Rapporteur, David Hammerstein)
Sodelovanje s Komisijo
Relations with the Commission
Odbor se še naprej zanaša na storitve Komisije za izvajanje predhodnih preiskav o številnih sprejemljivih peticijah.
The Committee on Petitions has continued to rely upon the services of the European Commission to conduct the preliminary investigation into a large number of admissible petitions.
Te preiskave odbor nato objavi, da se člani zavedajo pomena, ki ga imajo peticije pri odkrivanju kršitev prava Skupnosti.
Such investigations are subsequently published by the Committee and serve as notice to members, highlighting in particular the extent to which petitions may or may not bring breaches of Community law to light.
Sodelovanje med Odborom za peticije in Evropsko komisijo ostaja ključnega pomena za zagotavljanje pomoči vlagateljem peticij, saj se ti pogosto sklicujejo na kršitve v zvezi, kako nacionalne oblasti prenašajo in izvajajo zakonodajo EU.
Considering that petitioners often claim breaches related to the transposition and implementation of EU law by national authorities, relations between the Committee and the European Commission remain fundamental in trying to assist them.
Informacije Komisije se pogosto dopolnijo s podatki preiskav, ki jih izvaja odbor sam, zlasti pri primerih, ki se zdijo odboru najpomembnejši in za katere se vlagatelji peticij in druge zainteresirane stranke udeležujejo sej odbora, na katerih se določena zadeva obravnava.
This information provided by the Commission is supplemented in many cases by the Committee's own investigations, especially when subjects are given higher priority by the Committee and also by the presence of petitioners and other interested parties in the Committee meeting when the issues are debated.