natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za selektivno opredelitev namena členov 81 in 82 je primerno bolj jedrnato besedilo osnutka.
More concise drafting appropriate to selectively define the purpose of Articles 81 and 82.
(21a) Patenti imajo pomembno vlogo pri evropskih inovacijah.
(21a) Patents play an important role in European innovation.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega delovanja patentnega sistema je pomembno spremljati razvoj v tem sektorju, vključno z razvojem, ki obsega patente za računalniško izvedene izume.
To ensure effective functioning of the patent system, it is important to monitor developments in this sector, including developments involving patents on computer-implemented inventions.
V ta namen je treba zbrati ustrezne podatke in izdelati ustrezna poročila.
To this end, relevant data should be gathered and appropriate reports produced.
Takšna poročila morajo vsebovati podatke, ki se izrecno sklicujejo na sodelovanje malih in srednje velikih podjetij v sistemu patentov za računalniško izvedene izume.
Such reports should include information pertaining specifically to participation by small and medium-sized enterprises in the system of patents for computer-implemented inventions.
Sedanja statistika prikazuje precej veliko sodelovanje MSP v postopkih za patente CII.
Existing statistics demonstrate fairly broad participation in the CII patents process by SMEs.
Vseeno obstaja med vsemi interesnimi skupinami soglasje, da bi bili dodatni in bolj izčrpni statistični podatki o patentih CII dobrodošli.
However, there is consensus among all interested parties that additional and more comprehensive statistical data on CII patents would be welcomed.
Zgornji predlog spremembe bi zagotovil, da se takšni podatki zberejo.
The above amendment would ensure that such data is compiled.
Ta direktiva določa pravila za patentabilnost računalniško izvedenih izumov.
This Directive lays down rules for the patentability of computer - implemented inventions.
Ta direktiva določa pravila za patentabilnost računalniško podprtih izumov.
This Directive lays down rules concerning the patentability of computer-assisted inventions.
Izraz „izveden“ ni primeren, ker računalniško izvedena programska oprema ni izum in ni patentabilna kot programska oprema.
The term ‘implemented’ is not suitable, as computer-implemented software is not an invention, as software is not patentable.
Računalnik in programska oprema se uporabljata le za nadzorovanje izumov strojne opreme, od tu torej sprememba izraza.
The computer and its program are used only to control a hardware invention, hence the change of word.
Razen tega se izraz računalniško izveden izum med strokovnjaki ne uporablja, za razliko od izraza „računalniško podprt“, kot pri programski opremi za „računalniško podprto načrtovanje/računalniško nadzorovano proizvodnjo“.
Moreover, the expression computer implemented invention is not in use among specialists, unlike the expression ‘computer-assisted’, as in software for ‘computer-assisted design/ computer-assisted manufacturing’.
Člen 2, točka a
Article 2, point (a)
(a) "računalniško izvedeni izum" pomeni vsak izum, ki je izveden s pomočjo računalnika, računalniškega omrežja ali druge programljive naprave, z eno ali več značilnosti, ki so delno ali v celoti izvedene s pomočjo računalniškega programa ali računalniških programov ;
(a) computer- implemented invention means any invention the performance of which involves the use of a computer, computer network or other programmable apparatus, the invention having one or more features which are realised wholly or partly by means of a computer program or computer programs ;
(a) "računalniško podprt izum" pomeni vsak izum v smislu patentnega prava , ki je izveden s pomočjo programljive naprave;
(a) computer- aided invention means any invention the performance of which involves the use of programmable apparatus;
Preprosteje opredeli “računalniško podprt” izum.
Defines in a simpler way what a “computer-aided” invention is.
Člen 2, točka b
Article 2, point (b)
Člen 2, točka b a (novo)
Article 2, point (b a) (new)
(ba) "področje tehnologije", imenovano tudi "tehnološko področje" ali "tehnično področje" pomeni področje uporabe, ki zahteva uporabo obvladljivih naravnih sil za doseganje predvidljivih rezultatov v stvarnem svetu;
(ba) “field of technology”, also called “technological domain” or “technical domain”, means an application domain requiring the use of controllable forces of nature to achieve predictable results in the physical world;
Uvodna izjava 18
Article 2, point (b b) (new)
(bb) "tehnični" pomeni „ki sodi na področje tehnologije“.
(bb) “technical” means “belonging to a field of technology”;
Člen 2, točka b c
Article 2, point (b c) (new)
(bc) „interoperabilnost“ pomeni zmožnost računalniškega programa za sporočanje in izmenjavo informacij z drugimi računalniškimi programi ter medsebojno uporabo izmenjanih informacij, vključno z zmožnostjo za uporabo, pretvorbo ali izmenjavo datotečnih oblik, protokolov, shem, vmesnih informacij ali dogovorov, da se takšnemu računalniškemu programu omogoči delo z drugimi računalniškimi programi in uporabniki v vseh pogledih, za katere so bili namenjeni.
(bc) “Interoperability” means the ability of a computer program to communicate and exchange information with other computer programs and mutually to use the information which has been exchanged, including the ability to use, convert, or exchange file formats, protocols, schemas, interface information or conventions, so as to permit such a computer program to work with other computer programs and with users in all the ways in which they are intended to interact.
Računalniško izvedeni izum je patentabilen, če je industrijsko uporabljiv , nov in na inventivni ravni .
In order to be patentable, a computer-implemented invention must be susceptible of industrial application and new and must involve an inventive step.
Računalniško izvedeni izum je na inventivni ravni, če daje tehnični prispevek.
In order to involve an inventive step, a computer-implemented invention must make a technical contribution.
Tehnični prispevek mora biti nov in mora vključevati inventivno raven.
In order to be patentable, a computer-implemented invention must be susceptible of industrial application and make a technical contribution .
Inventivna raven mora biti ocenjena z obravnavanjem razlik med vsemi tehničnimi napravami iz celotnega patentnega zahtevka in stanjem tehnike na ustreznem tehničnem področju.
The inventive step is assessed by considering the difference between all of the technical and non-technical features of the patent claim and the state of the art.
Člen 3, odstavek 2 (novo)
Article 3, paragraph 2 (new)
Prijava za patent mora posredovati izum na zadovoljivo jasen in popoln način, da jo strokovnjak s področja izvede.
The application for a patent must disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art.
Ta predlog spremembe izrecno pojasnjuje, da mora prijava patenta jasno in razumljivo posredovati izum, da ga lahko nekdo, ki deluje na področju, izvede.
This amendment clarifies expressly that a patent application has to disclose an invention clearly and comprehensively, so that it can be implemented by someone working in the field.
Izraz „strokovnjak s področja“ je dobro znan izraz patentnega prava, ki pomeni nekoga s povprečnim znanjem in spretnostmi na ustreznem tehničnem področju.
The expression “a person skilled in the art’ is a well-established term of patent law which means someone of ordinary skill in the relevant technical field.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se računalniško izveden izum lahko prijavi kot izdelek, to je kot programirani računalnik, programirano računalniško omrežje ali druga programirana naprava ali kot postopek, izveden s pomočjo programske opreme takšnega računalnika, računalniškega omrežja ali naprave.
Member States shall ensure that a computer- implemented invention may be claimed as a product, that is as a programmed computer, a programmed computer network or other programmed apparatus, or as a process carried out by such a computer, computer network or apparatus through the execution of software .
Države članice zagotovijo, da se računalniško podprt izum lahko prijavi le kot izdelek, to je kot programirana naprava ali kot tehničen postopek, izveden s takšno napravo.
Member States shall ensure that a computer- aided invention may be claimed only as a product, that is a programmed apparatus, or as a technical process carried out by such an apparatus.
Če so posamezni elementi programa uporabljeni v kontekstih, ki ne predvidevajo izvedbe katerega koli upravičeno zahtevanega izdelka ali postopka, se taka uporaba ne bo štela za kršitev patenta.
Where individual elements of software are used in contexts which do not involve the realisation of any validly claimed product or process, such use will not constitute patent infringement.
Zahtevki v skladu z odstavkom 1 se razširijo na programsko opremo le v primerih, ko se elementi programske opreme uporabijo v okviru izvajanja računalniško izvedenega izuma, dovoljene pa so kršitve.
Only when software elements are used in the context of realising the computer-implemented invention the claims raised in accordance with paragraph 1 extend to the software and infringements may take place.
To mora biti omenjeno ne le v uvodni izjavi 17, ampak tudi v členu 5.
This should not only be mentioned in Recital 17 but also in Article 5.
Dopolnjuje pojasnjeno besedilo iz člena 5.2.
Complements the clearer wording of 5.2.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so za uporabo patentiranega računalniško izvedenega izuma na voljo licence z razumnimi in nediskriminatornimi pogoji, če je takšna uporaba:
Member States shall ensure that licences are available to use a patented computer-implemented invention on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions when such use is
(a) nujno potrebna za doseganje interoperabilnosti med računalniškimi programi, in(b) v javnem interesu.
(a) indispensable for achieving interoperability between computer programs, and (b) in the public interest.
Javni interes se privzame v primerih, ki jih člena 81 in 82 Pogodbe prepovedujeta.
The public interest shall be assumed in cases prohibited by Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty.
Razumni in nediskriminatorni pogoji še posebej upoštevajo
Reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions shall in particular have regard to
(a) stroške pridobitve vseh potrebnih licenc od ostalih imetnikov pravic za licencirani izdelek, sistem, mrežo ali storitev,
(a) the cost of obtaining all necessary licenses from other relevant right holders for the licensed product, system, network or service,
(b) splošno prevladujoče poslovne razmere, ki veljajo za dani tip licenciranega izdelka, sistema, mreže ali storitve, in
(b) the generally prevailing business conditions applicable to that class of licensed product, system, network or service, and
(c) investicije imetnika patenta v raziskave in razvoj.
(c) the R&D investments by the patent holder.
Komisija spremlja vpliv računalniško izvedenih izumov na inovativnost in konkurenčnost tako v Evropi kakor tudi v mednarodnem merilu, pa tudi vpliv na podjetja Skupnosti , še posebej majhna in srednje velika, na skupnost odprte kode in elektronsko poslovanje.
The Commission shall monitor the impact of computer-implemented inventions on innovation and competition, both within Europe and internationally, on Community businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, on the open-source community and on electronic commerce.
Komisija spremlja vpliv računalniško izvedenih izumov na inovativnost in konkurenčnost tako v Evropi kakor tudi v mednarodnem merilu, pa tudi vpliv na evropska podjetja, še posebej majhna in srednje velika, vključno z elektronskim poslovanjem , zlasti z vidika zaposlovanja v majhnih in srednje velikih podjetjih .
The Commission shall monitor the impact of computer-implemented inventions on innovation and competition, both within Europe and internationally, on European businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, including electronic commerce , in particular from the aspect of employment in small and medium-sized enterprises .
Ob upoštevanju, da evropsko gospodarstvo v veliki meri temelji na mreži malih in srednje velikih podjetij, ki imajo konkurenčno prednost zaradi kakovosti svojih izdelkov, ter da bi tem lahko škodilo izvajanje direktive, se zdi ustrezno spremljati možne škodljive učinke na ekonomske in proizvodne sisteme držav članic.
Given that the European economy is founded very largely on a network of small and medium-sized enterprises, which derive a competitive advantage from the quality of their products, and that they could be harmed by implementation of the directive, it seems proper to monitor the possible adverse effects on the economic fabric and production systems of the Member States.
Komisija mora spremljati učinek računalniško izvedenih izumov ne le z vidika inovativnosti in konkurenčnosti, ampak z vidika zaposlovanja, zlasti v malih in srednje velikih podjetjih, ki bi lahko bila prizadeta in imajo zelo pomembno vlogo v zaposlitvenih razmerah EU v povezavi z eno najpomembnejših prednostnih nalog EU, lizbonsko strategijo.
The Commission has to monitor the impact of computer-implemented inventions not only on the aspect of innovation and competition but from the aspect of employment, especially in small and medium-sized enterprises which could be affected negatively, and which take a very important part in the employment situation of the EU, in connection with one of the EU’s main priorities, the Lisbon Strategy.
Za pomoč pri obveznosti spremljanja, določene v členu 7 te direktive, se ustanovi Odbor za tehnološke novosti v sektorju malih in srednje velikih podjetij, v nadaljevanju „Odbor“.
To ensure compliance with the monitoring obligation imposed by Article 7 of this Directive, a committee on technological innovation in the small and medium-sized enterprise sector, hereinafter referred to as “the committee”, shall hereby be established.
Odbor zlasti:
The committee shall in particular:
(a) preverja vpliv patentov za računalniško izvedene izume na mala in srednje velika podjetja in opozarja na kakršne koli težave;
(a) examine the impact of patents for computer-implemented inventions on small and medium-sized enterprises and highlight any difficulties;
(b) spremlja sodelovanje malih in srednje velikih podjetij v patentnem sistemu, zlasti v zvezi s patenti za računalniško izvedene izume, in preučuje ter priporoča kakršne koli zakonodajne ali druge pobude na ravni EU, povezane s tem; in
(b) monitor participation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the patent system, with particular regard to patents for computer-implemented inventions, and consider and recommend any legislative or other European Union-level initiatives related thereto; and
(c) omogoča izmenjavo podatkov v zvezi s pomembnimi razvoji na področju patentov za računalniško izvedene izume, ki lahko vplivajo na interese malih in srednje velikih podjetij.
(c) facilitate the exchange of information with regard to relevant developments in the area of patents for computer-implemented inventions that might affect the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Komisija opravi študijo izvedljivosti ustanovitve Sklada za mala in srednje velika podjetja za zagotovitev finančne, tehnične in upravne pomoči malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, ki se ukvarjajo z zadevami, povezanimi s patentabilnostjo računalniško izvedenih izumov.
The Commission shall conduct a feasibility study into the establishment of a Fund for small and medium-sized enterprises to provide financial, technical and administrative support to small and medium-sized enterprises dealing with issues related to the patentability of computer-implemented inventions.
Ta predlog spremembe predlaga, da Evropska komisija preuči možnost „Sklada za MSP“ za pomoč MSP pri celotnem sodelovanju v patentnem režimu za računalniško izvedene izume in pri uživanju koristi tega režima.
This amendment proposes that the European Commission studies the possibility of an ‘SME Fund’ to assist SMEs in fully participating in, and benefiting from, the computer-implemented invention patent regime.
Člen 8, uvodni stavek
Article 8, introductory sentence
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu do*...... poroča:
The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council by*...... on:
* 5 let po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
* 5 years after the date of entry into force of this Directive.
* 3 leta po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
* 3 years after the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Treba je določiti jasen rok za poročilo Komisije in tudi za prvi pregled direktive v skladu s členom 9.
It is necessary to set a clear deadline for the Commission report, but also for the first review of the Directive in accordance with Article 9.
Časovni okvir petih let je treba razdeliti v dva, tako da Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu učinkovito poroča tri leta po začetku veljavnosti in direktivo pregleda pet let po začetku veljavnosti.
The timeframe of 5 years should be split into two so that the Commission effectively reports to the European Parliament and the Council by three years and reviews the Directive by five years after entry into force.
Člen 8, točka a a (novo)
Article 8, point (a a) (new)
( aa) o sodelovanju malih in srednje velikih podjetij v patentnem sistemu za računalniško izvedene izume.
( aa) participation by small and medium-sized enterprises in the patent system for computer-implemented inventions.
Takšno poročilo vključuje podatke v možnem obsegu o prosilcih in prejemnikih patentov za računalniško izvedene izume;
Such report shall include data, to the extent available, regarding applicants for and recipients of patents for computer-implemented inventions;
Sedanja statistika prikazuje dokaj veliko sodelovanje MSP v postopkih za patente CII.
Existing statistics demonstrate fairly broad participation in the CII patents process by SMEs.
Vendar obstaja med vsemi interesnimi skupinami soglasje, da bi bili dodatni in bolj izčrpni statistični podatki o patentih CII dobrodošli.
However, there is consensus among all interested parties that additional and more comprehensive statistical data on CII patents would be welcomed.
Zgornji predlog spremembe bi zagotovil, da bi se takšni podatki zbrali.
The above amendment would ensure that such data is compiled.
Člen 8, točka b
Article 8, point (b)
(b) ali so pravila, ki urejajo trajanje patenta in določitev zahtev patentabilnosti, in še posebej glede novosti, inventivne ravni in pravega obsega zahtev, ustrezna ter ali je zaželeno in pravno mogoče ta pravila spremeniti ob upoštevanju mednarodnih obveznosti Skupnosti ;
(b) whether the rules governing the term of the patent and the determination of the patentability requirements, and more specifically novelty, inventive step and the proper scope of claims, are adequate , and whether it would be desirable and legally possible having regard to the Community’s international obligations to make modifications to such rules ;
(b) ali so pravila, ki urejajo trajanje patenta in določitev zahtev patentabilnosti, in še posebej glede novosti, inventivne ravni in pravega obsega zahtev, ustrezna;
(b) whether the rules governing the term of the patent and the determination of the patentability requirements, and more specifically novelty, inventive step and the proper scope of claims, are adequate;
Zadnji del besedila skupnega stališča ni potreben.
Last part of the common position text is not necessary.
Člen 8, točka g a (novo)
Article 8, point (g a) (new)
(ga) o razvojih razlage pojmov „tehnični prispevek“ in „inventivna raven“ s strani patentnih uradnikov in patentnih sodišč ob upoštevanju prihodnjega razvoja tehnologije.
(ga) developments in the interpretation of the terms “technical contribution” and “inventive step” by patent offices and patent courts in the light of the future evolution of technology;
Parlament in Svet je treba obvestiti o praksi podeljevanja patentov v skladu s to direktivo.
Parliament and the Council should be informed about the practice of granting patents under this Directive.
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti razlagi najpomembnejših zakonskih opredelitev
Special attention should be given to the interpretation of the most relevant legal definitions.
Člen 8, točka g b (novo)
Article 8, point (g b) (new)
(gb) o tem, ali je možnost, navedena v tej direktivi, o uporabi patentiranega izuma zgolj za zagotovitev interoperabilnosti med obema sistemoma, ustrezna;
(gb) whether the option outlined in this Directive concerning the use of a patented invention for the sole purpose of ensuring interoperability between two systems is adequate;
Člen 8, točka g c (novo)
Article 8, point (g c) new
(gc) o študiji izvedljivosti ustanovitve Sklada za mala in srednje velika podjetja.
(gc) the feasibility study into the establishment of a Fund for small and medium-sized enterprises.
Člen 8, točka g d (novo)
Article 8, point (g d) (new)
(gb) o tem, ali je prišlo do težav zaradi podelitve patenta za računalniško izvedene izume, ki ne izpolnjujejo predpisanih zahtev za patentabilnost glede na to, ali izum
(gd) whether difficulties have been experienced arising from the grant of patents for computer-implemented inventions which do not comply with the statutory requirements for patentability both in terms of whether the invention
(i) vključuje inventivno raven in
(i) involves an inventive step and
(ii) ali daje tehnični prispevek
(ii) makes a technical contribution
v skladu s členom 4(1) zgoraj, in kot tak ne bi smel biti zakonito podeljen.
in accordance with Article 4(1), and as such should not legitimately have been granted.
Ta predlog spremembe obravnava skrbi, ki so bile izražene v zvezi s podelitvijo nepomembnih ali nevrednih patentov.
This amendment addresses the concerns that have been expressed about the grant of trivial, or undeserving, patents.
Daje novo pobudo Komisiji, da Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poroča, ali so bile v praksi odkrite težave, ki jih povzročijo patenti, ki ne bi smeli biti zakonito podeljeni.
It provides a new initiative for the Commission to report to the European Parliament and the Council on whether difficulties have been found in practice caused by patents that should not have legitimately been granted.
To bo spodbudilo Evropski patentni urad in nacionalne patentne urade k ohranjanju najvišjih standardov za preverjanje prijav patentov, s čimer bi se zmanjšalo tveganje za podelitev nevrednih patentov.
This will encourage the European Patent Office and national Patent Offices to maintain the highest standards for examining patent applications, thus minimising the risk of undeserving patents being granted.
Člen 8, točka g e (novo)
Article 8, point (g e) (new)
(ge) o tem, ali je ta direktiva povzročila želene vplive v zvezi z uskladitvijo in pojasnilom pravnih predpisov, ki urejajo patentabilnost računalniško izvedenih izumov.
(ge) whether this Directive has produced the desired effects in terms of harmonisation and clarification of the legal rules governing the patentability of computer-implemented inventions;
Za zagotovitev ocene, ali so bili doseženi cilji, ki vodijo k sprejetju te direktive.
To provide an assessment whether the aims leading to the adoption of this Directive have been achieved.
Člen 8, točka g f (novo)
Article 8, point (g f) (new)
(gf) o razvojih svetovnih patentnih sistemov na področju računalniško izvedenih izumov v zvezi z vidiki, omenjenimi v tem členu (točke (a) do (d) in (f) do (gb)).
(gf) the developments of the world-wide patent systems in the area of computer-implemented inventions in terms of the aspects mentioned in points (a) to (d) and (f) to (gb).
Razvoj patentnih sistemov, zlasti možnost, da bi imeli svetovni patentni sistem, je treba skrbno spremljati.
The evolution of the patent systems in other major jurisdictions, especially the possibility to have a world-wide patent system, should be closely monitored.