natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za omogočanje učinkovitega delovanja izvršnega odbora, se zdi primerno poleg predsednika in podpredsednika imenovati še dva predstavnika Sveta ter dva predstavnika Komisije, ki morajo vedno odločati s soglasjem.
In order to make it possible for the Executive Committee to operate efficiently it seems appropriate, in addition to the chairman and vice-chairman, to appoint two representatives of the Council and two of the Commission, who must always take decisions by consensus.
Poročevalka meni, da je zaželeno, da bi lahko Parlament poleg direktorja Centra zaslišal tudi predsednika upravnega odbora.
The rapporteur feels that it is desirable that, in addition to the Director of the Centre, it should be possible for Parliament to hear the Chairperson of the Management Board.
Upravnemu odboru in direktorju Centra pomaga znanstveni odbor, ki ima nalogo podati mnenje o vseh znanstvenih zadevah v zvezi z dejavnostmi Centra.
The Management Board and the Director of the Centre are assisted by a Scientific Committee whose task is to deliver an opinion on any scientific matter concerning the Centre's activities.
Poročevalka ugotavlja, da so države članice že sedaj zadostno zastopane v upravnem odboru in meni, deloma iz tega razloga, vendar zlasti z namenom zagotavljanja neodvisnosti delovanja tega organa, da znanstveni odbor ne bi smel imeti več kot 15 članov, ki bi morali biti izbrani glede na njihovo strokovnost in na podlagi odprtega postopka.
The rapporteur considers that the Member States are already sufficiently represented on the Management Board and takes the view, partly for that reason but more particularly because this body must be able to work independently, that the Scientific Committee should not have more than 15 members, who should be selected on the basis of their expertise, by means of an open procedure.
Le v okviru Sklepa Sveta z dne 10. maja 2005 o izmenjavi informacij, oceni tveganja in nadzoru novih psihoaktivnih snovi se lahko znanstveni odbor razširi z vključitvijo strokovnjakov iz Komisije, Europola in Evropske agencije za vrednotenje zdravil, kot tudi strokovnjakov iz znanstvenih področij, ki niso zadostno zastopani, če sploh.
Only in the context of the Council Decision of 10 May 2005 on information exchange, risk assessment and control of new psychoactive substances may the Scientific Committee be enlarged to include experts from the Commission, Europol and the EMEA, as well as experts from scientific fields which are insufficiently represented, if at all.
Omejitev števila članov odbora se zdi edini primeren način za izboljšanje učinkovitosti organizacije in sprejemanja odločitev.
Limiting the number of members of the Committee seems to be the only correct way of facilitating efficient organisation and decision-making.
Glede na to, da je poglavitna naloga Centra zbiranje in širjenje informacij o drogah in njihovi uporabi, bi zagotavljanje informacij o najboljših praksah za reševanje težav na področju drog ter izmenjava tovrstnih praks lahko prispevala k izboljšanju politik držav članic.
As the Centre's main task is to collect and disseminate information about drugs and drug use, providing information on best practices for tackling the drugs problem and facilitating exchanges of such practices would contribute to the policies of the Member States.
Poleg tega bi sodelovanje med nacionalnimi kontaktnimi točkami in organizacijami, ki so dejavne na področju drog, lahko omogočilo hitro in sprotno obveščanje o evropskih razmerah na področju drog, državam članicam pa bi ponudilo možnost učinkovitejšega odziva na nove dogodke in pojave na področju drog in njihove uporabe.
In addition, cooperation between national focal points and organisations active in the field of drugs could make it possible to keep abreast of the European drugs situation quickly and appropriately and enable Member States to respond more effectively to new developments and phenomena relating to drugs and drug use.
MNENJE ODBORA ZA OKOLJE, JAVNO ZDRAVJE IN VARNOST HRANE
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Evropski center za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami je bil ustanovljen z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 302/93 z 8. februarja o ustanovitvi Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami, da se Skupnosti in državam članicam zagotovi objektivne, zanesljive in primerljive informacije na evropski ravni v zvezi z drogami in zasvojenostjo z drogami.
The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction was set up by means of Council Regulation (EEC) No 302/93 of 8 February 1993 establishing a European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the purpose of providing the Community and its Member States with objective, reliable and comparable information concerning drugs and drug addiction.
Leta 2003 je Komisija predložila osnutek nove različice te uredbe.
In 2003 the Commission submitted a new draft version of that Regulation ( COM(2003)0808 ).
Kot pravni temelj je bil izbran člen 308, ko je to bilo tudi pri izvirni uredbi.
Article 308 was selected as the legal basis (as it had been in the case of the original Regulation).
Evropski parlament je bil vprašan za mnenje o osnutku, kljub temu, da je bila po več mesecih razprave v ustrezni delovni skupini Sveta sprejeta odločitev, da bo pravni temelj spremenjen na člen 152, ki predvideva postopek soodločanja.
The European Parliament was consulted in respect of the draft, although after several months of discussion within the relevant Council working party it was decided that the legal basis would be changed to Article 152, which provides for the codecision procedure.
Nato se je Komisija odločila, da preloži ta nov revidiran predlog ( KOM(2005)0399 ), da se lahko s Parlamentom ustrezno posvetuje o tej zadevi.
Hence the Commission decided to submit this new revised proposal ( COM(2005)0399 ) so that Parliament could be properly consulted on the matter.
Namen predloga je okrepiti pomen Centra, predvsem da se omogoči upoštevanje novih trendov pri jemanju drog (vključno s kombinacijo dovoljenih in prepovedanih psihoaktivnih snovi), in da se omogoči Centru prilagoditev novim razmeram po širitvi EU.
The purpose of the proposal is to 'beef up' the Centre, in particular in order to enable new trends in drug use to be taken into consideration (including the combination of legally permitted and legally banned psychoactive substances) and in order to enable the Centre to adapt to new circumstances following the enlargement of the EU.
Predlog bi tudi moral odpraviti številne dvoumnosti, ki so bile odkrite po uveljavitvi izvirne uredbe Sveta.
The proposal should also eliminate the number of ambiguities which were detected after the original Council regulation came into force.
Da se zagotovi, da Center dejansko učinkovito dela, pa je vseeno treba nekatere določbe iz predloga spremeniti.
However, in order to ensure that the Centre genuinely operates effectively, some of the provisions contained in the proposal need to be amended in some way.
Center se ne bi smel ukvarjati le z zbiranjem, analizo in obdelavo podatkov, povezanimi z drogami; moral bi se tudi ukvarjati s sistematsko oceno politik v zvezi z drogami (tako na ravni EU kot na ravni držav članic) in trendov v zvezi z uživanjem drog.
The Centre should not be concerned solely with gathering, analysing and processing data relating to drug issues; rather, it should also be concerned with the systematic evaluation of drug policies (at both EU and Member-State level) and of trends in drug consumption.
To bi državam članicam olajšalo učenje od drugih držav članic in izmenjavo izkušenj pri boju proti zasvojenostjo z drogami.
That would make it easier for the Member States to learn from one another and to exchange experiences in their efforts to combat drug addiction.
Nadaljnja zahteva je, da bi sodelovanje med Centrom in državami, ki niso članice EU, moralo biti bolj tesno, vsaj kar zadeva sistematskega zbiranja in analize podatkov, povezanih z drogami, med drugim tudi zato, ker večina drog pride v EU preko ozemlja (navadno sosednjih) držav nečlanic.
A further requirement is that there should be more intensive cooperation between the Centre and non-EU countries, at least in terms of the systematic gathering and analysis of data relating to drug issues, not least in view of the fact that most drugs enter the European Union from non-EU (frequently neighbouring) countries.
Center mora izdelati tudi skupna merila in standardne načine zbiranja podatkov, ki naj jih uporabijo vse vpletene stranke, glede na to, da je to edini način za zagotovitev, da so podatki v zvezi z drogami objektivni, zanesljivi in predvsem primerljivi.
The Centre must also devise common criteria and standard data-collection methods to be used by all the parties involved, since that is the only way of ensuring that data relating to drug issues are objective, reliable and above all comparable.
Nadalje bi bila izmenjava podatkov o drogah in kaznivih dejanjih, storjenih v povezavi z uživanjem drog, med Centrom in Europolom koristna za obe strani.
Furthermore, the exchange of information between the Centre and Europol concerning drugs and crimes committed in connection with drug use would be beneficial to both parties.
Evropski parlament bi moral biti bolj vključen v dejavnosti Centra in bi moral biti ustrezno obveščen o njegovem delu.
The European Parliament should be more involved in the Centre's activities and should be properly informed regarding its work.
Torej ko se sestavlja triletni delovni program Centra, bi bilo treba upoštevati ne le mnenje Komisije, temveč tudi Parlamenta.
Hence when the Centre's three-year work programme is being drawn up, not only the Commission's opinion should be taken into consideration - the European Parliament should be asked for its opinion, too.
Parlament bi moral imeti tudi enega predstavnika v izvršnem odboru (neodvisnega strokovnjaka, ki ga izbere Parlament).
Parliament should also have one representative on the Executive Committee (an independent expert designated by Parliament).
Da se zagotovi, da Komisija nima prevelikega vpliva na delo Centra, zadostuje tričetrtinska večina, ko upravni odbor sprejema pomembne odločitve (ki na primer zadevajo letni in triletni program Centra) če Komisija izrazi svoje nestrinjanje.
In order to ensure that the Commission does not have excessive influence over the Centre's work, a mere ¾ majority should be sufficient for the Management Board to adopt important decisions (concerning, for example, the Centre's annual and three-year programme) in cases where the Commission expresses its disagreement.
Direktorja Centra bi bilo treba imenovati na enak način kot direktorje drugih organov Skupnosti.
The Director of the Centre should be nominated in the same way as the directors of other Community bodies.
Torej bi direktorja ali direktorico moral imenovati izvršni odbor s seznama kandidatov, ki ga pripravi Komisija po tem, ko sta javni razpis in poziv k prijavi na razpis bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije ter v večjem časopisu v vsaki državi članici.
Hence he or she should be nominated by the Executive Committee from a list of candidates proposed by the Commission after a public competition and an invitation to take part therein have been announced in the Official Journal and in one major daily newspaper in each Member State.
Ta način imenovanja direktorja je tudi bolj pregleden in javni razpis bo pritegnil večje število morebitnih kandidatov.
This method of nominating a director is also more transparent and a public competition would attract a greater number of potential candidates.
Center bi moral razširiti svoje naloge in vključiti nadzorovanje psihomodulacijskih snovi.
The Centre should expand its remit to include the monitoring of psychomodulation substances.
V primeru zlorabe te snovi zdravju povzročajo resno, dolgotrajno in pogosto nepopravljivo škodo.
If they are abused they cause serious, long-lasting and frequently irreversible damage to health.
V prihodnosti bi enter moral pokrivati tudi težave s področja uživanja tobaka in alkohola, saj obstajajo vzporednice med težavami, ki jih povzroča uživanje drog in med tistimi, ki jih povzroča uživanje tobaka in alkohola.
In the future the Centre should also cover the problems of alcohol and tobacco abuse, since there are close parallels between the problems associated with drug abuse and those associated with alcohol and tobacco abuse.
Pri porabnikih alkohola in tobaka obstaja znatno povečanje tveganja za zasvojenost z drogami in ljudje pogosto prehajajo z uživanja alkohola in tobaka na uživanje droge in obratno.
In the case of alcohol and tobacco consumers there is a significantly increased relative risk of drug addiction and people frequently switch from alcohol and tobacco to drugs, or vice versa.
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
OJ C ... /Še ne objavljeno v UL.
OJ C ... /Not yet published in OJ.
(7a) Potrebno bi bilo upoštevati tudi prepovedano in neprimerno uporabo psihomodulacijskih snovi, ki lahko resno škodujejo telesnemu in duševnemu zdravju.
(7a) Account should also be taken of illicit and inappropriate use of psy chomodulation substances , which can have serious consequences on physical and mental health.
(7a) Za boljše širjenje in izmenjavo najboljše prakse bi morali Centru zaupati tudi nalogo zagotavljanja informacij o različnih politikah na področju drog v državah članicah in njihovega ocenjevanja.
(7b) The Centre should also be entrusted with the task of providing information and evaluating different drug policies in Member States in order to facilitate the dissemination and exchange of best practice.
Države članice bi se morale učiti iz izkušenj drugih držav na področju boja proti zlorabi drog.
Member States should learn from each other's experience on combating drug abuse.
Center bi lahko k temu prispeval z ocenjevanjem vpliva različnih politik.
The Centre could facilitate this by evaluating the impact of different policies.
(9) Zaželeno je, da lahko izvajanje projektov strukturne pomoči Skupnosti v zvezi z sistemi obveščanja o drogah v državah nečlanicah Skupnosti, kot so države kandidatke ali države zahodnega Balkana, ki jim je Evropski svet dovolil, da sodelujejo v programih in agencijah Skupnosti, Komisija zaupa neposredno ECSDZD.
(9) It is desirable for the Commission to be able to entrust the EMCDDA directly with the implementation of Community structural assistance projects relating to drug information systems in non-Community countries such as the candidate countries or the countries of the western Balkans which have been authorised by the European Council to participate in Community programmes and agencies.
(9) Zaželeno je, da lahko izvajanje projektov strukturne pomoči Skupnosti v zvezi z sistemi obveščanja o drogah v evropskih državah nečlanicah Skupnosti, kot so države kandidatke ali države zahodnega Balkana, ki jim je Evropski svet dovolil, da sodelujejo v programih in agencijah Skupnosti, Komisija zaupa neposredno ECSDZD.
(9) It is desirable for the Commission to be able to entrust the EMCDDA directly with the implementation of Community structural assistance projects relating to drug information systems in non-Community European countries such as the candidate countries or the countries of the western Balkans which have been authorised by the European Council to participate in Community programmes and agencies.
Projekti strukturne pomoči bi se morali še naprej omejiti na države kandidatke in na države zahodnega Balkana.
Structural assistance projects should continue to be confined to the candidate countries and the countries of the western Balkans.
(18) Redno je treba opraviti zunanjo oceno dela ECSDZD in to uredbo po potrebi ustrezno spremeniti.
(18) An external evaluation of the EMCDDA's work should be conducted on a regular basis , and this Regulation should be adapted accordingly, if needed.
(18) Vsaka tri leta je treba opraviti zunanjo oceno dela ECSDZD in to uredbo po potrebi ustrezno spremeniti.
(18) An external evaluation of the EMCDDA's work should be conducted every three years , and this Regulation should be adapted accordingly, if needed.
Temelj dela Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami bodo triletni delovni programi (glej člen 9, odstavek 4).
The work of the EMCDDA will be based on three-year work programmes (see Article 9, paragraph 4).
V zadnjem letu vsakega obdobja bi bilo smiselno izvesti zunanjo oceno, ki bi bila osnova za pripravo novega programa.
It would be logical to carry out an external evaluation during the last year of each period in order to have input for the preparations for the new programme.
Center ne zbira nobenih podatkov, ki omogočajo prepoznavo posameznikov ali majhnih skupin posameznikov.
The Centre shall not collect any data making it possible to identify individuals or small groups of individuals.
Vzdrži se vsakega prenosa informacij, ki se nanaša na konkretno imenovane primere, razen v primeru kaznivih dejanj .
It shall refrain from any transmission of information relating to specific named cases unless criminal offences have been committed .
(i) zbiranje, zapisovanje in analiza informacije, vključno s podatki iz raziskav, ki jih sporočijo države članice, in informacije, ki izvirajo iz virov Skupnosti in nevladnih nacionalnih virov ter iz pristojnih mednarodnih organizacij; to zbiranje, zapisovanje in analiza zajema tudi podatke o nastajajočih trendih v hkratni uporabi več vrst drog, vključno s hkratno uporabo dovoljenih in prepovedanih psihoaktivnih snovi;
(i) collecting, registering and analysing information, including data resulting from research, communicated by Member States as well as that emanating from Community, non-governmental national sources and competent international organizations; this collection, registration and analysis work shall also cover data on emerging trends in poly-drug use, including the combined use of licit and illicit psychoactive substances;
(i) zbiranje, zapisovanje in analiza informacij, vključno s podatki iz raziskav, ki jih sporočijo države članice in evropske države nečlanice Skupnosti , in informacij, ki izvirajo iz virov Skupnosti in nevladnih nacionalnih virov ter iz pristojnih mednarodnih organizacij; to zbiranje, zapisovanje in analiza zajema tudi podatke o nastajajočih trendih v hkratni uporabi več vrst drog, vključno s hkratno uporabo dovoljenih in prepovedanih psihoaktivnih snovi, in o prepovedani uporabi psihomodulacijskih snovi, zagotavljajoč podatke o "najboljši praksi" v državah članicah kot tudi poenostavitev njene izmenjave med državami članicami;
(i) collecting, registering and analysing information, including data resulting from research, communicated by Member States and non-Community European countries as well as that emanating from Community, non-governmental national sources and competent international organizations; this collection, registration and analysis work shall also cover data on emerging trends in poly-drug use, including the combined use of licit and illicit psychoactive substances , and on the illicit use of psychomodulation substances , providing information on and facilitating the exchange of "best practice" in the Member States ;
Veliko drog prihaja v Evropsko unijo iz sosednjih držav.
Many drugs entering the European Union originate from neighbouring countries.
Center bi moral sistematično zbirati in preučevati podatke vsaj iz tistih evropskih držav nečlanic Skupnosti, ki sodelujejo pri njegovem delu.
The Centre should systematically collect and analyse data at least from those non-Community European countries, which take part in its work.
Z ozirom na resne zdravstvene posledice nezakonite in neprimerne uporabe psihomodulacijskih snovi je pomembno, da Center spremlja tudi njihovo uporabo.
Moreover, given the serious health consequences of the illicit and inappropriate use of psychomodulation substances , it is important that their use is also monitored by the Centre.
Center bi moral zagotavljati informacije in izboljšati izmenjavo najboljše prakse v državah članicah.
The Centre should provide information and facilitate the exchange of "best practice" in the Member States.
Člen 2, točka (b) (i)
Article 2, point (b) (i)
(i) zagotavljanje boljše primerljivosti, objektivnosti in zanesljivosti podatkov na evropski ravni z vzpostavitvijo nezavezujočih kazalcev in enotnih meril, katerih izpolnjevanje lahko Center priporoči za boljše poenotenje merilnih metod, ki jih uporabljajo države članice in Skupnost; Center razvije zlasti orodja in instrumente, s katerimi se državam članicam olajšata spremljanje in ocenjevanje njihovih nacionalnih politik, Evropski komisiji pa spremljanje in ocenjevanje politik Unije;
(i) ensuring improved comparability, objectivity and reliability of data at European level by establishing indicators and common criteria of a non-binding nature , compliance with which may be recommended by the Centre, with a view to greater uniformity of the measurement methods used by the Member States and the Community; in particular, the Centre shall develop tools and instruments to facilitate Member States in the monitoring and evaluation of their national policies and the European Commission in monitoring and evaluation of Union policies;
(i) zagotavljanje boljše primerljivosti, objektivnosti in zanesljivosti podatkov na evropski ravni z vzpostavitvijo kazalcev in enotnih meril, katerih izpolnjevanje lahko Center priporoči za boljše poenotenje merilnih metod, ki jih uporabljajo države članice in Skupnost; Center razvije zlasti orodja in instrumente, s katerimi se državam članicam olajšata spremljanje in ocenjevanje njihovih nacionalnih politik, Komisiji pa spremljanje in ocenjevanje politik Unije; Center svetuje državam članicam o najboljši praksi na osnovi zbranih podatkov.
(i) ensuring improved comparability, objectivity and reliability of data at European level by establishing indicators and common criteria, compliance with which may be recommended by the Centre, with a view to greater uniformity of the measurement methods used by the Member States and the Community; in particular, the Centre shall develop tools and instruments to assist Member States in the monitoring and evaluation of their national policies and the Commission in the monitoring and evaluation of Union policies; on the basis of collected data, the Centre shall also advise Member States on best practice.
Oblikovanje skupnih meril in statističnih metod za zbiranje podatkov je ključnega pomena za verodostojnost dela Centra.
Establishing common criteria and statistical methods for data collection are vitally important for the credibility of the work of the Centre.
Center bi moral na osnovi zbranih informacij svetovati državam članicam o najboljši praksi.
The Centre should advise Member States on best practice on the basis of the collected information.
(ba) sistematično ocenjevanje politik na področju drog ter trendov porabe za izboljšanje oblikovanja politik in širjenja najboljše prakse
(ba) Systematic evaluation of drug policies and consumption trends in order to facilitate policy-making and the dissemination of best practice
(i) z ocenjevanjem nacionalnih strategij in politik na področju drog, vključno z zakonodajo, na osnovi zbranih podatkov in opredeljenih kazalcev,
(i) evaluating national drug policies and strategies, including legislation, on the basis of collected data and established indicators,
(ii) z ocenjevanjem trendov porabe in ponudbe.
(ii) evaluating consumption and supply trends.
Center se ne bi smel omejiti le na zbiranje podatkov, ampak bi jih moral tudi ovrednotiti.
The Centre should not only collect data but also evaluate it.
To bi izboljšalo oblikovanje politik na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni.
This would facilitate policy-making both at the EU and the national level.