natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Izboljšave so zagotovo možne:
Improvements are certainly possible:
Tako stanje stvari bi se težko skladalo s potrebo, da se od varovanja podatkov odstopi le v izjemnih okoliščinah, kot to izhaja iz člena 8 EKČP, kar morajo spoštovati tako države članice kot tudi EU.
Such a state of affairs would be hard to square with the need to derogate only in exception cases from data protection as it emerges from Article 8 of the ECHR, which both Member States and the EU have to respect.
Pravilo, ki nudi toliko izjem, da pokrije preprečevanje vseh vrst kaznivih dejanj, ne bi imelo učinka.
A rule providing for so many exceptions as to cover those connected with the prevention of any sort of crime would be without any effective scope.
- Kar zadeva količino podatkov, ki se jo obdela (sedaj bi bilo možno zlahka preveriti, ali od 34-ih vrst podatkov PNR, so tisti, ki se jih dejansko uporablja, tisti, ki zadevajo istovetnost potnikov - podatki, ki jih že uporabljajo države članice v povezavi z direktivo o nadzorovanju nezakonitega priseljevanja).
- in terms of the number of data to be processed (it would now be easy to check whether, of the 34 types of PNR data, the ones that are really used are those relating to passenger identity - data which are already used by the Member States in connection with the directive for the control of illegal immigration).
Kakšen je smisel v tem, da se za več let nadaljuje s shranjevanjem milijard podatkov, ki ne bodo nikoli uporabljeni?
What point is there in continuing to collect and store for years billions of data which are not even going to be used?
- Kar zadeva izbris podatkov, ko je enkrat varnostna kontrola zaključena (kot to predvidevata kanadski in avstralski sistem, ki ju je Evropski parlament sprejel).
- in terms of the deletion of data once the security check has been carried out (as provided by the Canadian and Australian system which have been accepted by the European Parliament).
V družbi, ki se ima za "demokratično", je težko upravičiti hranjenje podatkov ljudi, ki niso nikoli povzročili varnostnih težav (pogoj, ki ga nakazuje člen 8 EKŠP).
In a society purporting to be "democratic" it is hard to justify keeping the data of persons who have not raised security issues (condition impliedly laid down by Article 8 of the ECHR).
- V smislu možnosti sodnih postopkov v primeru zlorabe (tudi v tem primeru evropski potniki nimajo enakih pravic kot potniki iz ZDA; v čem je smisel mednarodnega sporazuma z zaveznikom, če ne dosežemo enake stopnje zaščite za svoje državljane?).
- in terms of the possibility of court proceedings in the event of abuse (here again, European passengers do not have the rights of US passengers; what point is there in an international agreement with an ally if we do not obtain the same level of protection for our own citizens?)
Previdnostno načelo
The precautionary principle
Ne bi moglo biti bolj očitno, da bo sporazum med EU in ZDA na tem področju postal referenčno merilo tako za evropsko zakonodajo kot tudi svetovno.
It could not be more obvious that the EU/US agreement in this sphere is going to become a reference standard both for European legislation and globally.
Zato se zdi previdni pristop, ki ga je predlagala skupina 29, in sicer da novi sporazum pokriva le preostanek obdobja sporazuma o PNR, ki ga je Sodišče razglasilo za nično (november 2007), povsem razumen.
As a result, the prudent approach suggested by Group 29 of envisaging the new agreement as covering only the remaining period of the PNR Agreement annulled by the Court (November 2007) seems completely reasonable.
Bilo bi zelo zaželeno, da se v organih, kot so ICAO, vodi temeljito razpravo, ter demokratičen dialog v nacionalnih parlamentih, preden se pristop, ki ga administracija ZDA želi vsiliti, spremeni v svetovni standard.
Before transforming the approach which the US administration seeks to impose in this field into a world standard, it would be extremely desirable to have an in-depth discussion in bodies such as the ICAO and a democratic debate in the national parliaments.
Pravila, ki tako pomembno spreminjajo odnose med državljani in javnimi organi in ki zadevajo na stotine milijonov ljudi vsako leto, zahtevajo kaj več kot hitro rešitev, kot to predlagajo države članice in Komisija tudi po sodbi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti.
Rules making such a substantial change in relations between citizens and the public authorities and affecting hundreds of millions of people every year warrant much more than a "quick fix" as the Member States and the Commission are suggesting even after the judgment of the Court of Justice.
Poleg tega je treba previdno oceniti nevarnost ekonomskih povračilnih ukrepov do letalskih družb in potnikov, saj v primeru, da se jih izvršuje nediskriminatorno (torej tudi, ko ni oseb, opredeljenih kot nevarnih), bi administracijo ZDA izpostavili kaznovanju s strani STO zaradi neupravičene spremembe v prevozih in zaradi povzročanja ekonomske izgube lastnim letalskim družbam.
Moreover, the threats of economic reprisals against airlines and passengers must be assessed cautiously in that if they were applied indiscriminately (e.g. in the absence of any persons classed as dangerous), they would expose the US administration to the charge before the WTO of altering air transport abusively as well as causing its own airlines to suffer economic losses.
S tega stališča obstaja dvom o tem, ali so podatki, ki jih ameriški kongres sedaj preučuje z zvezi z učinkovitostjo take predhodne kontrole, cenovno učinkoviti.
From this point of view, the data which Congress is currently examining in relation to the effectiveness of such preventive screening raises doubts as to its cost-effectiveness.
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA B6-0382/2006
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION B6-0382/2006
v skladu s členom 114(1) poslovnika
pursuant to Rule 114(1) of the Rules of Procedure
ki ga vlaga Sophia in 't Veld
by Sophia in 't Veld
o vsebini sporazuma z Združenimi državami Amerike o uporabi evidence imen letalskih potnikov (PNR) za boj proti terorizmu in mednarodnemu kriminalu, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom, ter za njihovo preprečevanje
on the content of the Agreement with the United States of America on the use of Passenger Name Records (PNR) data to prevent and combat terrorism and transnational crime, including organised crime
– ob upoštevanju sodbe Sodišča z dne 30. maja 2006 v združenih zadevah C-317/04 in 318/04,
– having regard to the Court of Justice's judgment of 30 May 2006 in Joined Cases C-317/04 and 318/04,
– ob upoštevanju člena 114(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 114(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
A. ker je Sodišče razveljavilo (sodba z dne 30. maja 2006 v združenih zadevah C-317/04 in 318/04) sklep 2004/496/ES, ki pooblašča predsednika Sveta za podpis sporazuma z Združenimi državami Amerike o evidencah imen letalskih potnikov, in odločbo o ustreznosti, ki jo je sprejela Komisija 14. maja 2004 in obravnava enako zadevo,
A. whereas the Court of Justice annulled (judgment of 30 May 2006 in Joined Cases C-317/04 and 318/04) Decision 2004/496/EC authorising the President of the Council to sign the Agreement with the United States of America on PNR and the Adequacy Decision adopted by the Commission on 14 May 2004 dealing with the same subject,
B. ker se Sodišče ni odzvalo na zaskrbljenost Parlamenta o pravni strukturi sporazuma in njegovi neskladnosti z načelom varstva podatkov iz člena 7 evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah (EKČP),
B. whereas the Court of Justice did not respond to Parliament's concerns about the legal structure of the agreement and on its lack of compliance with the data protection principles of Article 7 of the ECHR,
(a) se je od 1. oktobra 2006 treba izogniti pravni pomanjkljivosti na evropski ravni glede prenosa podatkov o potnikih, pravice in svoboščine potnikov pa je treba zaradi enostranskih zahtev, ki jih je posredovala administracija ZDA, varovati še bolj kot doslej;
(a) a legal lacuna at European level should be avoided from 1 October 2006 for the transfer of passenger data. and the rights and freedoms of passengers should be protected even more than at present in the face of the unilateral 'undertakings' submitted by the US administration;
(b) EU nujno rabi jasen pravni okvir, da bo lahko okvirni sklep o varovanju podatkov sprejet čim prej;
(b) the EU urgently needs a clear legal framework, with the result that the Draft Data Protection Framework Decision should be adopted as a matter of urgency;
(c) morajo načela EU o varovanju podatkov navdihniti vse nove sporazume na tem področju;
(c) EU principles on data protection should inspire any new agreements in this domain;
(d) se je treba z oblikovanjem doslednega medstebrskega okvira za varovanje podatkov v Uniji z uporabo premostitvene klavzule v skladu s členom 42 PEU izogibati umetni delitvi stebrov, da se zagotovi, da bo nov sporazum sklenjen v sodelovanju z EP in pod sodnim nadzorom Sodišča;
(d) the artificial division between the pillars should be avoided through the creation of a consistent cross-pillar data protection framework in the Union by activating the passerelle clause under Article 42 TEU, so as to ensure that the new Agreement will be concluded in association with the EP and subject to the judicial supervision of the Court of Justice;
B. ker bo zaradi koledarskih omejitev nujno:
B. whereas, owing to calendar constraints, it will be necessary:
(a) pogajanje o novem kratkoročnem mednarodnem sporazumu za obdobje od 1. oktobra 2006 do novembra 2007 (to obdobje je najprej zajemal sporazum med ZDA in EU, ki ga je Sodišče razveljavilo);
(a) to negotiate a new short-term international agreement to cover the period between 1 October 2006 and November 2007 (the period originally covered by the US/EU agreement annulled by the Court);
(b) odpraviti pomanjkljivosti, ki so opisane v prvi skupni reviziji sporazuma EU/ZDA in upoštevati priporočila evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov (*) in člena 29 delovne skupine (*);
(b) to overcome the shortcomings outlined in the first joint EU/US review of the agreement and to take into account the recommendations of the European Data Protection Supervisor (*) and the Article 29 Working Party (*);
(c) če je potrebno, razviti bolj usklajen srednje- in dolgoročni pristop k izmenjavi podatkov o potnikih na ravni ICAO, da bi zagotovilo tako varnost v letalskem prometu kot tudi spoštovanje človekovih pravic na svetovni ravni;
(c) to develop, if necessary, for the medium to long term a more coherent approach at ICAO level towards the exchange of passenger data in order to ensure both air traffic security and respect of human rights at global level.
Pogajanja za sklenitev sporazuma z Združenimi državami Amerike o uporabi evidence imen letalskih potnikov (PNR) za boj proti terorizmu in mednarodnemu kriminalu, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom, ter za njihovo preprečevanje
Negotiations for an agreement with the United States of America on the use of passenger name records (PNR) data to prevent and combat terrorism and transnational crime, including organised crime
Datum sklepa o pripravi poročila
Date of decision to draw up report
Simon Busuttil in Manuel Medina Ortega
Simon Busuttil, Manuel Medina Ortega
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 2092/91 o ekološki pridelavi kmetijskih proizvodov in označevanju tovrstno pridelanih kmetijskih proizvodov in živil
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto in agricultural products and foodstuffs
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0671 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0671 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0033/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0033/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6‑0253/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0253/2006 ),
Člen 11, odstavek 1 (Uredba (EGS) št. 2092/91)
Article 11, paragraph 1 (Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91)
Uvožen proizvod iz tretje države se lahko da na trg Skupnosti z oznako ekološki, če je skladen s pravili pridelave, predpisanimi s to uredbo.
A product imported from a third country may be placed on the Community market labelled as organic where it complies with the production rules laid down in this Regulation.
Uvožen proizvod iz tretje države se prav tako lahko da na trg Skupnosti z oznako ekološki , če izpolnjuje v nadaljevanju navedene pogoje : če je skladen s pravili predelave, predpisanimi s to uredbo , in je država porekla jasno razpoznavna za uvoznike in potrošnike ter je mogoče preveriti in potrditi skladnost z zgoraj navedenimi pogoji.
A product imported from a third country may be placed on the Community market labelled as organic where it meets the following conditions: it complies with the production rules laid down in this Regulation and the country of origin is clearly identifiable to importers and consumers and compliance with the above conditions can be checked and verified.
Gospodarski subjekti v tretjih državah, vključeni v katero koli stopnjo proizvodnje, predelave in distribucije zadevnega proizvoda , morajo o svojih dejavnostih obvestiti pristojni organ ali organ pregleda v skladu s členom 9, če zadevni organ izvaja nadzor v tretjih državah proizvodnje, ali nadzorni organ, priznan v skladu z odstavkom 5.
Economic agents in third countries who are involved at any stage in the production, processing and distribution of the product in question must have given notice of their activities to a competent authority or inspection body pursuant to Article 9, provided that the authority or body in question carries out checks in the third country of production, or to a control body that is recognised pursuant to paragraph 5.
Proizvod ima potrdilo, ki ga izdajo pristojni nadzorni organi ali organi pregleda v skladu s členom 9.
The product shall be covered by a certificate issued by the competent inspection authorities or bodies pursuant to Article 9.
Potrdilo potrjuje, da proizvod izpolnjuje pogoje iz tega odstavka.
The certificate shall confirm that the product satisfies the conditions laid down in this paragraph.
Če pri takih proizvodih potrdilo ni zahtevano, jim mora biti priložen dokument, ki potrjuje njihovo skladnost vsemi predpisi iz uredbe Skupnosti
If certification is not required in the case of such products, they will have to be accompanied by a document stating that they comply with all the rules laid down in the Community regulation.
Člen 11, odstavek 2 (Uredba (EGS) št. 2092/91)
Article 11, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91)
Izvajalec iz tretje države, ki želi pod pogoji iz odstavka 1 dati svoje proizvode na trg Skupnosti z oznako ekološki, predloži svoje dejavnosti kateremu koli pristojnemu ali nadzornemu organu iz člena 9, pod pogojem da zadevni organ v tretji državi pridelave izvaja nadzor, ali pa nadzornemu organu, ki je bil odobren skladno z odstavkom 5 tega člena.
A third country operator who wishes to place his products labelled as organic on the Community market, under paragraph 1, shall submit his activities to any inspection authority or inspection body as referred to in Article 9, provided that the authority or body concerned perform controls in the third country of production, or to a control body approved in accordance with paragraph 5 of this Article.
Če se uvoženemu proizvodu dovoli neposreden dostop do trga, ne da bi pri tem zahtevali potrdilo, da je ekološki, potem potrošniki ne bodo imeli enakih zagotovil, kot jih imajo pri ekoloških proizvodih z izvorom v EU.
Granting an imported product direct market access without requiring a certificate proving that the product qualifies as organic will not provide consumers with the same guarantees as are offered by organic products originating in the EU .
Člen 11, odstavek 3, točka (a) (Uredba (EGS) št. 2092/91)
Article 11, paragraph 3, point (a) (Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91)
(a) izdelek je bil proizveden skladno s standardi pridelave, enakovrednimi tistim, ki veljajo za ekološko pridelavo v Skupnosti , ali v skladu z mednarodno priznanimi standardi, ki jih predpisujejo smernice Codex Alimentarius ;
(a) the product has been produced in accordance with production standards equivalent to those applied to organic production in the Community, or in accordance with the internationally recognised standards set out in the Codex Alimentarius guidelines;
a) izdelek je bil proizveden skladno s standardi pridelave, enakovrednimi tistim, ki veljajo za ekološko pridelavo v Skupnosti;
(a) the product has been produced in accordance with production standards equivalent to those applied to organic production in the Community;
Codex Alimentarius določa splošne smernice za pridelavo ekoloških proizvodov in nikakor ne predvideva strogih predpisov za pridelavo iz Uredbe 2092/91, ki veljajo za pridelovalce ekoloških proizvodov v Skupnosti.
The Codex Alimentarius provides general guidelines for the production of organic products and makes no provision at all for the stringent production arrangements under Regulation 2092/91, with which Community producers of organic products comply.
Zato bodo pridelovalci Skupnosti v bistveno slabšem položaju v pridelovalnem procesu.
Community producers will, therefore, be at a considerably greater disadvantage in the production process.
Člen 11, odstavek 3, točka (b) (Uredba (EGS) št. 2092/91)
Article 11, paragraph 3, point (b) (Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91)
(b) za pridelovalca veljajo določbe o nadzoru, ki so enakovredne določbam nadzornega sistema v Skupnosti ali so skladne s smernicami Codex Alimentarius ;
(b) the producer has been subject to control arrangements which are equivalent to those of the Community control system, or which comply with the Codex Alimentarius guidelines;
(b) za pridelovalca veljajo določbe o nadzoru, ki so enakovredne določbam nadzornega sistema v Skupnosti;
(b) the producer has been subject to control arrangements which are equivalent to those of the Community control system;
Codex Alimentarius določa splošne smernice za pridelavo ekoloških proizvodov in nikakor ne predvideva strogih predpisov za pridelavo iz Uredbe 2092/91, ki jih morajo spoštovati pridelovalci ekoloških proizvodov v Skupnosti.
The Codex Alimentarius provides general guidelines for the production of organic products and makes no provision at all for the stringent production arrangements under Regulation 2092/91, with which Community producers of organic products comply.
Člen 11, odstavek 3, točka (d) (Uredba (EGS) št. 2092/91)
Article 11, paragraph 3, point (d) (Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91)
(d) proizvod ima potrdilo, ki so ga izdali pristojni ali nadzorni organi tretje države, priznani v skladu z odstavkom 4, ali ga je izdal nadzorni organ, priznan v skladu z odstavkom 5, ki potrjuje, da izdelek izpolnjuje pogoje, predpisane v tem odstavku.
(d) the product is covered by a certificate issued by the competent authorities or control bodies of a third country recognised in accordance with paragraph 4, or by a control body recognised in accordance with paragraph 5, which confirms that the product satisfies the conditions set out in this paragraph.
(d) proizvod ima potrdilo, ki so ga izdali nadzorni organi tretje države, priznani v skladu z odstavkom 4, ali ga je izdal nadzorni organ, priznan v skladu z odstavkom 5, ki potrjuje, da izdelek izpolnjuje pogoje, predpisane v tem odstavku.
(d) the product is covered by a certificate issued by the control authorities or bodies of a third country recognised in accordance with paragraph 4, or by a control body recognised in accordance with paragraph 5, which confirms that the product satisfies the conditions set out in this paragraph.
Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 14(2) navede značilnosti potrdila o nadzoru in določi pravila za njegovo uporabo, preden začne veljati nova uvozna shema.
Pursuant to the procedure referred to in Article 14(2), the Commission shall specify the characteristics of the control certificate and shall lay down the rules governing its use before the new import scheme comes into force.
Potrdilo se izda izključno za posamezno pošiljko, ki ji je priloženo in na katero se nanaša.
Τhe certificate shall be issued solely in respect of the particular consignment which it accompanies and to which it refers.
Potrdilo, priloženo uvoženemu blagu, ne more biti enako tistemu, ki je v Uredbi št. 1788/2001 navedeno kot potrdilo o kontrolnem pregledu, saj bodo uvozna dovoljenja nekoč ukinjena.
The certificate accompanying imported goods cannot be similar to the one referred to in Regulation No 1788/2001 as a ‘certificate of inspection’, since import authorisations will at some stage cease to exist.
Zato bo treba spremeniti sedanje potrdilo in določiti predpise o njegovi uporabi pred začetkom izvajanja novih uvoznih shem (načeloma 1. januarja 2007).
This means that changes will have to be made to the current certificate and rules governing the use thereof will have to be laid down before the new import scheme comes into operation (in principle by 1 January 2007).
Člen 11, odstavek 3, točka (d a) (novo) (Uredba (EGS) št. 2092/91)
Article 11, paragraph 3, point (d a) (new) (Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91)
(da) nadzorni organi tretjih držav, odobreni v skladu z odstavkom 4 ali priznani v skladu z odstavkom 5, ustrezajo evropskemu standardu EN 45011 o splošnih merilih za certifikacijske organe za proizvode (ISO 65) in jih je do 1. januarja 2009 v skladu s tem standardom pooblastil kateri koli organ za pooblaščanje, ki je podpisnik večstranskega sporazuma o priznavanju.
(da) third-country control bodies which are approved in accordance with paragraph 4 or which are recognised in accordance with paragraph 5, comply with European standard EN 45011 concerning the general criteria relating to product-certification bodies (ISO 65) and are accredited before 1 January 2009 in accordance with that standard by any accreditation body which is signatory to the Multilateral Recognition Agreement.
Nadzorni organi v tretjih državah morajo ustrezati standardu EN 45011 (ali biti pooblaščeni v skladu z njim), da bi tako zagotovili, da za proizvode iz tretjih držav velja nadzorna shema, enakovredna shemi Skupnosti.
In order to ensure that products from third countries are subject to a control scheme equivalent to the Community scheme, control bodies in third countries must comply (or be accredited in accordance) with standard EN 45011.
Omogočiti je treba razumno časovno obdobje za pridobitev pooblastil.
A reasonable period of time should be allowed for securing accreditation.
Člen 11, odstavek 4, pododstavek 1(Uredba (EGS) št. 2092/91)
Article 11, paragraph 4, subparagraph 1(Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91)
Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 14(2) priznava tretje države, katerih standardi pridelave in sistem nadzora so enakovredni tistim, ki veljajo v Skupnosti, ali so skladni z mednarodno priznanimi standardi, določenimi v smernicah Codex Alimentarius, in sestavi seznam teh držav.
The Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2), recognise the third countries whose production standards and control arrangements are equivalent to those applied in the Community, or are in accordance with the internationally recognised standards set out in the Codex Alimentarius guidelines, and publish a list of these countries.
Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 14(2) priznava tretje države, katerih standardi pridelave in sistem nadzora so enakovredni tistim, ki veljajo v Skupnosti, in sestavi seznam teh držav.
The Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 14(2), recognise the third countries whose production standards and control arrangements are equivalent to those applied in the Community and publish a list of these countries.
Objavljeni seznam je treba redno pregledovati in podatke preverjati z rednim nadzorom pridelovalnih struktur, standardov in njihovih dokumentov na mestu samem.
The published list must be reviewed regularly and the data verified by means of regular on-the-spot inspections of production facilities, standards and related documents.