natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice bi se morale še posebej vzdržati ukrepov, ki povečujejo poplavno ogroženost v drugih državah članicah, in bi morale na svojem ozemlju iskati nadomestila za omejevanje naravnega toka reke.
In particular, Member States should refrain from measures which increase the risk of flooding in other Member States, and they should seek compensation within their own territory for limitations of the natural course of the river.
Ker poplave pogosto povzročijo nenamerno onesnaženje okolja zaradi industrijskih, kmetijskih in drugih obratov na prizadetem območju, morajo načrti za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti upoštevati verjetne vire onesnaženja.
As floods are often followed by accidental environmental pollution due to industrial, agricultural and other facilities on the area concerned, the flood risk management plans should take probable pollution sources into account.
(13) Načrti za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti naj se usmerijo na preprečevanje, varstvo in pripravljenost.
(13) Flood risk management plans should focus on prevention, protection and preparedness.
Dele načrtov za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti je treba redno pregledovati in po potrebi posodobiti ob upoštevanju verjetnih učinkov podnebnih sprememb na pojavljanje poplav.
The elements of flood risk management plans should be periodically reviewed and if necessary updated, taking into account the likely effects of climate change on the occurrence of floods.
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
(13) Flood risk management plans should focus on prevention, protection and preparedness.
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
Linguistic amendment in German: does not affect the English version.
(14) V okviru obvladovanja poplavne ogroženosti je zelo pomembno načelo solidarnosti.
(14) The solidarity principle is very important in the context of flood risk management.
V tem pogledu naj bi države članice spodbudilo k pravični porazdelitvi odgovornosti pri skupnem sprejemanju ukrepov v zvezi z obvladovanjem poplavne ogroženosti v celotnem rečnem toku, od katerih imajo vsi korist.
In the light of it Member States should be encouraged to seek a fair sharing of responsibilities, when measures are jointly decided for the common benefit, as regards flood risk management along water courses .
V tem pogledu naj bi države članice spodbudilo k skupnim ukrepom, ki so v korist vseh.
In the light of it Member States should be encouraged to take joint measures which are of common benefit.
Pri tem bi si morale prizadevati za pravično porazdelitev odgovornosti.
In doing so, a fair sharing of responsibilities should be sought .
Načelo solidarnosti pomeni, da države članice delujejo skupaj pri pripravi načrtov in sprejemanju ukrepov za preprečevanje poplav ter da se države članice vzdržijo sprejemanja ukrepov, ki povečujejo poplavno ogroženost v drugi državi članici, razen, če so takšni ukrepi del skupnega načrta.
The solidarity principle means that Member States work together to draw up plans and take measures to prevent floods and that Member States refrain from taking measures which increase the risk of flooding in another Member State, unless such a measure forms part of a common plan.
Uvodna izjava 14 skupnega stališča spodbuja države članice, naj si prizadevajo za pravično čezmejno porazdelitev odgovornosti za skupne ukrepe, ki imajo učinek v dveh ali več državah.
Recital 14 of the Common Position encourages Member States to seek to share responsibility fairly across borders for joint measures which have an impact in two or more countries.
Tukaj gre prvenstveno za pravično porazdelitev odgovornosti in ne za prizadevanja, da bi opredelili morebitne skupne ukrepe.
Fair sharing of responsibilities is the prime concern here, not efforts to identify possible joint measures.
Pomembna koristna značilnost direktive bi morala biti spodbujanje držav članic k iskanju ukrepov preko svojih meja, ki imajo skupni učinek v dveh ali več državah.
An important beneficial feature of the directive should be that it encourages Member States to seek measures across their borders which have a joint effect in two or more countries.
Obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti je pomemben del celostnega upravljanja povodij, ki ga uvaja Direktiva 2000/60/ES.
Flood risk management is an important element of integrated river basin management, which is established by Directive 2000/60/EC.
Zaradi prednosti vzajemnega potenciala skupnih sinergij in koristi med direktivami, ki zagotavljajo učinkovitost in razumno rabo virov, bi se morala tudi v tej direktivi uporabljati ista enota upravljanja.
In order to benefit from mutual potential for common synergies and benefits between the directives ensuring efficiency and wise use of resources, the same unit of management should apply under this directive.
(16a) Države članice morajo svoje ocene, karte in načrte pripraviti na podlagi najboljših razpoložljivih podatkov, praks in tehnologij s področja obvladovanja poplavne ogroženosti.
(16a) Member States should base their assessments, maps and plans on the best data, practice and technologies available in the field of flood risk management.
Ponovno je vložen predlog spremembe, ki je vsebinsko jasnejši in združuje dva predloga sprememb iz prve obravnave (prej uvodni izjavi 22 in 24), in sicer o uporabi novih praks in tehnologij za zaščito državljanov.
This combines and clarifies two amendments from the first reading (ex recitals 22 and 24) relating to the use of new practices and technologies for the protection of citizens.
(17) V primeru večnamenske rabe vodnih teles pri različnih oblikah trajnostnih človeških dejavnosti (npr. obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti, ekologija, rečna plovba ali hidroelektrarne) ter ob upoštevanju vplivov teh rab na vodna telesa zagotavlja Direktiva 2000/60/EC jasen in pregleden postopek za obravnavanje takšnih rab in vplivov, vključno z možnimi odstopanji od ciljev "dobrega stanja" ali "neposlabševanja stanja " iz člena 4.
(17) In cases of multi-purpose use of bodies of water for different forms of sustainable human activities (e.g. flood risk management, ecology, inland navigation or hydropower) and the impacts of such use on the bodies of water, Directive 2000/60/EC provides for a clear and transparent process for addressing such uses and impacts, including possible exemptions from the objectives of "good status" or of "non‑deterioration" in Article 4 thereof.
(17) V primeru večnamenske rabe vodnih teles pri različnih oblikah trajnostnih človeških dejavnosti (npr. obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti, ekologija, rečna plovba ali hidroelektrarne) ter ob upoštevanju vplivov teh rab na vodna telesa zagotavlja Direktiva 2000/60/EC jasen in pregleden postopek za obravnavanje takšnih rab in vplivov, vključno z možnimi odstopanji od ciljev "dobrega stanja" ali "neposlabševanja stanja " iz člena 4.
(17) In cases of multi-purpose use of bodies of water for different forms of sustainable human activities (e.g. flood risk management, ecology, inland navigation or hydropower) and the impacts of such use on the bodies of water, Directive 2000/60/EC provides for a clear and transparent process for addressing such uses and impacts, including possible exemptions from the objectives of "good status" or of "non-deterioration" in Article 4 thereof.
Načelo povračila stroškov, vključno z okoljskimi stroški in stroški virov, bi se moralo uporabljati za ukrepe in infrastrukturo za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti v skladu z Direktivo 2000/60/ES.
The principle of cost-recovery, including environmental and resource costs, should apply to flood risk management measures and infrastructure in accordance with Directive 2000/60/EC.
(18a) Komisija mora prejeti pooblastila, da določi tehnične obrazce za obdelavo podatkov, vključno s statističnimi in kartografskimi podatki, ter obrazce za njihov prenos na Komisijo, kakor tudi da prilagodi prilogo znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku.
(18a) In particular, the Commission should be able to determine the technical formats for the processing of data, including statistical and cartographic data, and the formats for their transmission to the Commission, as well as to adapt the Annex to scientific and technical advances.
Ker so ti ukrepi splošnega obsega in so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te direktive in dopolnitvi te direktive z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb, bi jih bilo treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Since these are measures of general scope that amend non-essential provisions of this Directive and add new non-essential provisions, they should be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, set out under Decision 1999/468/EC.
Te spremembe so v skladu z nujnim prilagajanjem na novi postopek komitologije.
This amendment makes the necessary adjustments in line with the new comitology procedure.
Namen te direktive je vzpostaviti okvir za oceno in obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti v Skupnosti s ciljem zmanjšanja škodljivih posledic poplav na zdravje ljudi, okolje, kulturno dediščino in gospodarske dejavnosti.
The purpose of this Directive is to establish a framework for the assessment and management of flood risks, aiming at the reduction of the adverse consequences for human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity associated with floods in the Community.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe iz prve obravnave (prej predlog spremembe 27): Bistvenega pomena je, da okvir za obvladovanje poplavne ogroženosti podpira izpolnjevanje ciljev iz ostale zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Reinstatement of the amendment from first reading (ex amendment 27): It is crucial that framework to manage flood risks does support the achievement of the objectives of other Community legislation.
Države članice pa lahko za izvajanje te direktive :
However, for the implementation of this Directive, Member States may :
Države članice pa lahko za izvajanje te direktive imenujejo pristojne upravne organe, ki niso organi, določeni v skladu s členom 3(2) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
However, for the implementation of this Directive, Member States may appoint competent authorities different from those identified pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
(a) imenujejo pristojne upravne organe, ki niso organi, določeni v skladu s členom 3(2) Direktive 2000/60/ES;
(a) appoint competent authorities different from those identified pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC;
(b) opredelijo nekatera obalna območja ali posamezna povodja, ki jih dodelijo območju upravljanja, ki pa ni tisto, ki je določeno v skladu s členom 3(1) Direktive 2000/06/ES.
(b) identify certain coastal areas or individual river basins and assign them to a unit of management different from those assigned pursuant to Article 3(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Zaradi prednosti vzajemnega potenciala skupnih sinergij in koristi med obema direktivama ter da se zagotovi učinkovitost in razumno rabo virov, bi se morala tudi v tej direktivi uporabljati ista enota upravljanja.
In order to benefit from mutual potential for common synergies and benefits between the two directives and to ensure efficiency and wise use of resources, the same unit of management should be used under this directive.
Predhodna ocena poplavne ogroženosti se opravi zato, da se na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij oziroma informacij, ki jih je mogoče neposredno uporabiti, kot so na primer obstoječi podatki o preteklih poplavah, izdela ocena morebitne ogroženosti.
A preliminary flood risk assessment shall be undertaken to provide an assessment of potential risks based on available or readily derivable information, such as records.
Ocena vsebuje vsaj:
The assessment shall include at least the following:
Predhodna ocena poplavne ogroženosti se opravi zato, da se na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij oziroma informacij, ki jih je mogoče neposredno uporabiti, kot so na primer obstoječi podatki o preteklih poplavah in študije o dolgoročnem razvoju, zlasti o podnebnih spremembah , izdela ocena morebitne ogroženosti.
A preliminary flood risk assessment shall be undertaken to provide an assessment of potential risks based on available or readily derivable information, such as records and studies on long-term developments, in particular climate change .
Ponovno je vložen predlog spremembe, ki je vsebinsko jasnejši in združuje predloge sprememb iz prve obravnave ( prej člen 4(2)(c), (e) in (f)).
This amendment combines and clarifies amendments from the first reading (ex Article 4(2)(c), (e) and (f).
Pri predhodni oceni je treba upoštevati samo že obstoječe raziskave o dolgoročnem razvoju, zlasti o podnebnih spremembah.
Only existing studies on long-term developments, in particular climate change, should be taken into account in preliminary assessments.
(a) karte vodnega območja v ustreznem merilu, vključno z mejami povodij, porečij in , kjer je primerno, obalnih območij, ki prikazujejo topografijo in rabo tal;
(a) maps of the river basin district at the appropriate scale including the borders of the river basins, sub-basins and where appropriate coastal areas, showing topography and land use
(a) karte vodnega območja v ustreznem merilu, vključno z mejami povodij, porečij in obalnih območij, ki prikazujejo topografijo in rabo tal;
(a) maps of the river basin district at the appropriate scale including the borders of the river basins, sub-basins and coastal areas, showing topography and land use;
Človekove dejavnosti so zgoščene na obalnih območjih, ki so še posebej izpostavljena verjetnim posledicam podnebnih sprememb.
Human activities are concentrated in the coastal areas which are particularly exposed to the likely effects of climate change.
Zato bi bilo treba vsa obalna območja vključiti v predhodno oceno poplavne ogroženosti.
Therefore all coastal areas should be included into the preliminary flood risk assessment.
Člen 4, odstavek 2, uvodni stavek pred točko (d)
Article 4, paragraph 2, introductory phrase before point (d)
kjer je to primerno, pa vsebuje tudi:
and, where appropriate, it shall include:
Poskuša se najti kompromis med stališčem Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi (da v besedilu ne sme biti omejitev) in skupnim stališčem Sveta.
This is an attempt to find a compromise between Parliament's position at first reading (which was that there should be no restriction) and the Council common position.
(d) oceno morebitnih škodljivih posledic prihodnjih poplav za zdravje ljudi, okolje, kulturno dediščino in gospodarske dejavnosti, ob upoštevanju, kolikor je to mogoče, dejavnikov kot so topografija, položaj vodotokov ter njihove splošne hidrološke in geomorfološke značilnosti, položaj naseljenih območij, območij gospodarskih dejavnosti in dolgoročnega razvoja, vključno z vplivi podnebnih sprememb na pojav poplav.
(d) an assessment of the potential adverse consequences of future floods for human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity, taking into account as far as possible issues such as the topography, the position of watercourses and their general hydrological and geo-morphological characteristics, the position of populated areas, areas of economic activity and long-term developments including impacts of climate change on the occurrence of floods.
(d) oceno morebitnih škodljivih posledic prihodnjih poplav za zdravje ljudi, okolje, kulturno dediščino in gospodarske dejavnosti, ob upoštevanju, kolikor je to mogoče, dejavnikov, kot so topografija, položaj vodotokov ter njihove splošne hidrološke in geomorfološke značilnosti, vloga poplavnih območij kot naravnih zadrževalnih območij, položaj naseljenih območij, območij gospodarskih dejavnosti in dolgoročnega razvoja, vključno z vplivi podnebnih sprememb na pojav poplav.
(d) an assessment of the potential adverse consequences of future floods for human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity, taking into account as far as possible issues such as the topography, the position of watercourses and their general hydrological and geo-morphological characteristics, the role that floodplains play as natural retention areas, the position of populated areas, areas of economic activity and long-term developments including impacts of climate change on the occurrence of floods.
Navedene ocene niso potrebne, če lokalne razmere to dopuščajo.
Local conditions permitting, the above assessments need not be carried out obligatorily.
Ponovno je vložen predlog sprememb iz prve obravnave (člen 4, odstavek 2(c)); kot je znano, so namreč zadrževalna območja zelo pomembna pri varstvu pred poplavami.
Reinstatement of the amendment from the first reading (ex Article 4(2)(c), as it is known that retention areas are crucial to flood protection.
Poleg tega se poskuša najti kompromis med stališčem Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi in skupnim stališčem Sveta.
This is also an attempt to reach a compromise between Parliament's position at first reading and the Council common position.
Člen 4, odstavek 2, točka (d a) (novo)
Article 4, paragraph 2, point (d a) (new)
(da) po potrebi oceno učinkovitosti obstoječe umetne infrastrukture za zaščito pred poplavami, ob upoštevanju njene dejanske zmogljivosti za preprečitev škode ter njene gospodarske in okoljske učinkovitosti.
(da) if need be, an assessment of the effectiveness of existing man-made flood defence infrastructures, taking into account their real capacity to prevent damage as well as their economic and environmental effectiveness.
Ponovno je vložen predlog spremembe iz prve obravnave (člen 4, odstavek 2(h)).
Reinstatement of the amendment from the first reading (ex Article 4(2)(h)).
Države članice izdelajo predhodno oceno poplavne ogroženosti do 22. decembra 2012 .
Member States shall complete the preliminary flood risk assessment by 22 December 2012 .
Države članice izdelajo predhodno oceno poplavne ogroženosti do 22. decembra 2010 .
Member States shall complete the preliminary flood risk assessment by 22 December 2010 .
Zaradi strnitve postopka so ponovno predlagani prvotno predvideni roki Parlamenta (člen 6, odstavek 1, spremenjeno).
Reinstatement of Parliament's original deadline in order to tighten the procedure (ex Article 6(1), amended).
Na podlagi ocene poplavne ogroženosti iz člena 4 države članice za vsako vodno območje ali upravno upravljanja iz člena 3(2)(b) ali del mednarodnega vodnega območja, ki leži na njihovem ozemlju, opredelijo tista območja, za katera država članica ugotovi, da obstaja možnost pomembne poplavne ogroženosti ali utemeljena verjetnost, da bi se ta lahko pojavila.
On the basis of a preliminary flood risk assessment as referred to in Article 4, Member States shall, for each river basin district, or unit of management referred to in Article 3(2)(b), or portion of an international river basin district lying within their territory, identify those areas for which they conclude that potential significant flood risks exist or might reasonably be considered likely to occur.
Na podlagi ocene poplavne ogroženosti iz člena 4 države članice za vsako vodno območje ali upravno upravljanja iz člena 3(2)(b) ali del mednarodnega vodnega območja, ki leži na njihovem ozemlju, opredelijo tista območja, za katera država članica ugotovi, da obstaja pomembna poplavna ogroženost ali verjetnost, da bi se ta lahko pojavila.
On the basis of a preliminary flood risk assessment as referred to in Article 4, Member States shall, for each river basin district, or unit of management referred to in Article 3(2)(b), or portion of an international river basin district lying within their territory, identify those areas for which they conclude that significant flood risks exist or might be considered likely to occur.
Jezikovna poenostavitev zaradi boljše razumljivosti in pravne jasnosti.
Simplification of language for better comprehensibility and legal clarity.
Člen 6, odstavek 3, točka (c)
Article 6, paragraph 3, point (c)
(c) poplav z veliko verjetnostjo, kjer je to primerno .
(c) floods with a high probability, where appropriate .
(c) poplav z veliko verjetnostjo, kadar je to mogoče .
(c) floods with a high probability, wherever possible .
Srednja pot med stališčem Parlamenta, ki ne predvideva izjem (prejšnji člen 7(2)) in sedanjim stališčem Sveta.
This is a compromise between Parliament's position, which does not provide for exceptions (ex Article 7(2)), and the Council's current position.
Zaradi zaščite državljanov je treba čim širše zaobjeti poplave z veliko verjetnostjo.
Floods with a high probability should be taken into account as much as possible for the sake of public protection.
Pristojni organi lahko to opustijo samo ob nezmožnosti in/ali sprejemljivi utemeljitvi.
The responsible bodies should only be permitted not to do so in the event that it is impossible and/or there are plausible grounds not to do so.
Člen 6, odstavek 4, točka (c a) (novo)
Article 6, paragraph 4, point (c a) (new)
(ca) poplavne površine in druga naravna območja, ki lahko zdaj in v prihodnosti delujejo kot zadrževalno ali varnostno območje za poplavne vode.
(ca) floodplains and other natural areas that can serve as a retention or buffer area at present or in the future.
Tako bi izgubila ali oslabila svojo pomembno vlogo zmanjševanja poplavne ogroženosti, tveganju pa bi bilo izpostavljeno novo premoženje, ki bi se tja vložilo.
They would then lose or weaken their important function of reducing flood risk, and the new assets placed there would be at risk.
Člen 6, odstavek 5, točka (c)
Article 6, paragraph 5, point (c)
(c) obrati iz Priloge I Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES z dne 24. septembra 1996 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja, ki lahko v primeru poplav povzročijo nenamerno onesnaženje, in zavarovana območja iz Priloge IV(1)(i),(iii) in (v) Direktive 2000/60/ES, ki jih lahko prizadene poplava;
(c) installations as referred to in Annex I to Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control which might cause accidental pollution in case of flooding and potentially affected protected areas identified in Annex IV(1)(i), (iii) and (v) to Directive 2000/60/EC;
(c) obrati iz Priloge I Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES z dne 24. septembra 1996 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja, ki lahko v primeru poplav povzročijo nenamerno onesnaženje, in zavarovana območja iz Priloge IV(1) Direktive 2000/60/ES, ki jih lahko prizadene poplava;
(c) installations as referred to in Annex I to Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control which might cause accidental pollution in case of flooding and potentially affected protected areas identified in Annex IV(1) to Directive 2000/60/EC;
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe iz prve obravnave (predlog spremembe 49).
Reinstatement of the amendment from the first reading (amendment 49).
Register zaščitenih območij, predviden v členu 6 Direktive 2000/60/ES, bi moral vključevati tudi občutljiva hranilna območja in območja, namenjena gospodarsko pomembnim vodnim vrstam.
The register of protected areas required under article 6 of Directive 2000/60/EC should also include nutrient sensitive areas and areas designated for economically significant aquatic species.
V skladu s členom 10 Direktive 2000/60/ES bi morale države članice izvajati kombiniran pristop glede emisij iz točkovnih in razpršenih virov.
In compliance with Article 10 of the Directive 2000/60/EC, Member States are to carry out a combined approach concerning emissions from point and diffuse sources.
Člen 6, odstavek 5, točka (d)
Article 6, paragraph 5, point (d)
(d) drugimi podatki, za katere države članice menijo, da so koristni, kot na primer navedba območij, kjer lahko pride do poplav z visoko vsebnostjo toka sedimenta ali naplavin.
(d) other information which the Member State considers useful such as the indication of areas where floods with a high content of transported sediments and debris floods can occur.