natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3. poudarja, da morajo načela učinkovitosti pomoči, nacionalne lastnine, partnerstva, skladnosti politik, koordinacije, usklajenosti s sistemom države prejemnice in usmerjenost v rezultate, kot določa Evropsko soglasje o razvoju in zavezanost Pariške deklaracije, veljati za sodelovanje z vsemi državami v razvoju;
Stresses that the principles of aid effectiveness, national ownership, partnership, policy coherence, coordination, harmonisation, alignment with the recipient country system and results orientation, as defined in the European Consensus on Development and the Paris Declaration Commitments, must be applied to cooperation with all developing countries;
7. pozdravlja zavezanost Komisije k pospešenem sodelovanju za boljše upravljanje v Latinski Ameriki ter poudarja koristnost razvijanja zmogljivosti kot orodja za dosego tega cilja;
Welcomes the commitment of the Commission to step up cooperation to improve governance in Latin America and points to the usefulness of capacity-building as a tool to achieve this objective;
Okrepljeno partnerstvo med Evropsko unijo in Latinsko Ameriko
Enhanced cooperation between the European Union and Latin America
Predlog(-i) resolucije, vključen(-i) v poročilo
Motions(s) for resolution(s) included in the report
o učinkovitosti pomoči in korupciji v državah v razvoju
on aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries
- ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic znotraj Sveta, Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije "Evropsko soglasje o razvoju",
- having regard to the Joint Statement by the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission entitled "The European Consensus on Development",
- ob upoštevanju Konvencije ZN o boju proti korupciji z dne 31. oktobra 2003,
- having regard to the UN Convention against Corruption of 31 October 2003,
- ob upoštevanju Deklaracije ZN o boju proti korupciji in podkupovanju v mednarodnem trgovinskem poslovanju z dne 16. decembra 1996,
- having regard to the UN Declaration against Corruption and Bribery in International Commercial Transactions of 16 December 1996,
- ob upoštevanju Konvencije OECD o boju proti podkupovanju tujih uradnikov v mednarodnem poslovanju z dne 21. novembra 1997,
- having regard the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions of 21 November 1997,
- ob upoštevanju Deklaracije tisočletja, ki so jo 8. septembra 2000 sprejeli ZN in v kateri so zastavljeni razvojni cilji novega tisočletja (RCNT), ki jih je mednarodna skupnost oblikovala za odpravo revščine,
- having regard to the UN Millennium Declaration of 8 September 2000, which sets out the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as objectives established jointly by the international community for the elimination of poverty,
- ob upoštevanju Pariške deklaracije o učinkovitosti pomoči z dne 2. marca 2005,
- having regard to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness of 2 March 2005,
- ob upoštevanju četrtega poročila o presoji ekosistemov tisočletja z dne 12. julija 2005 z naslovom „Ekosistemi in dobro počutje človeka: možnosti in izzivi za podjetja in industrijo“,
- having regard to the Fourth Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Report of 12 July 2005 entitled "Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry",
- ob upoštevanju členov 8, 9 in 97 Sporazuma o partnerstvu iz Cotonouja,
- having regard to Articles 8, 9 and 97 of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement,
- ob upoštevanju izjave vrha G8 z dne 2. junija 2003 v Evianu o boju proti korupciji in izboljšanju preglednosti,
- having regard to the Declaration by the G8 Summit in Evian on Fighting Corruption and Improving Transparency of 2 June 2003,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije za Afriko z dne 11. marca 2005 z naslovom „Naši skupni interesi“,
- having regard to the Report of the Commission for Africa of 11 March 2005 entitled “Our Common Interest”,
- ob upoštevanju strategije EU o boju proti nedovoljenemu kopičenju in prometu z orožjem malega kalibra in lahkim strelnim orožjem (SALW) ter pripadajočim strelivom, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel 15.-16. decembra 2005;
- having regard to the EU strategy to combat the illicit accumulation and trafficking of small arms and light weapons (SALW) and their ammunition adopted by the European Council on 15-16 December 2006;
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. maja 2003 o razvoju zmogljivosti v državah v razvoju
- having regard to its resolution of 15 May 2003 on Capacity-building in the developing countries
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 31. marca 2004 o upravljanju razvojne politike Evropske unije
- having regard to its resolution of 31 March 2004 on Governance in the European Union's development policy
- ob upoštevanju člena 45 svojega poslovnika,
- having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj ( A6-0048/2006 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0048/2006 ),
A. ker korupcija prizadene nesorazmerno veliko škodo revnim, saj omejuje njihov dostop do javnih dobrin in znižuje kakovost osnovnih storitev, zaradi česar težje najdejo pot iz začaranega kroga revščine,
A. whereas corruption hurts the poor disproportionately, restricting their access to public goods and lowering the quality of basic services, making it more difficult to escape the poverty spiral,
B. ker korupcija negativno vpliva na poslovno okolje, učinkovitost javnih storitev in zaupanje javnosti v vlado,
B. whereas corruption has a negative impact on the business climate, the effectiveness of public service provision and the public's trust in their government,
C. ker korupcija ovira učinkovitost pomoči in zato ogroža razvojne cilje EU ter upočasnjuje razvoj držav partneric EU,
C. whereas corruption obstructs aid effectiveness and therefore undermines the development goals of the EU and slows down the pace of development in the EU's partner countries,
D. ker Svetovna banka ocenjuje, da se vsako leto po vsem svetu izplača več kot 1 bilijon USD podkupnin, Afriška unija pa, da korupcija afriško gospodarstvo stane več kot 25% afriškega BDP letno,
D. whereas the World Bank estimates that more than USD 1 trillion is paid in bribes every year throughout the world and the African Union estimates that corruption costs African economies more than 25% of Africa's GDP annually,
E. ker je korupcija problem, ki negativno vpliva na družbo kot celoto in se pojavlja v številnih oblikah, in ker enotne rešitve zanjo ni, saj je za to, da se korupcija odpravi, potreben širok pristop,
E. whereas corruption is a problem affecting society as a whole and takes many forms and a "one size fits all" strategy does not apply as corruption can only be permanently eliminated through a broad approach,
F. ker v boju proti korupciji lahko igrajo vlogo številni akterji, vključno s politiki, vladnimi uslužbenci, civilno družbo, mediji, multinacionalkami in mednarodnimi donatorji,
F. whereas numerous players, including politicians, government officials, civil society, the media, multinationals and international donors, can play a role in the fight against corruption,
G. ker je korupcija tako eden od vzrokov kot ena od posledic sporov,
G. whereas corruption is both one of the causes and one of the consequences of conflict situations,
H. ker korupcija predstavlja grožnjo osnovnim človekovim potrebam, kot je dostop do zdravja in izobraževanja,
H. whereas corruption is a threat to basic human needs, such as access to health and education,
I. ker je korupcija stranski učinek šibkega upravljanja, tesno povezanega z vlogo države, zato se je treba proti njej boriti s strategijami, ki spodbujajo dobro upravljanje,
I. whereas corruption is a by-product of weak governance, inextricably linked to the role of the State, and should therefore be fought by strategies promoting good governance,
J. ker sta preglednost in odgovornost temeljni načeli v boju proti korupciji,
J. whereas transparency and accountability are key principles in the fight against corruption,
K. ker je treba posvetiti ustrezno pozornost povezavi med nedovoljeno proizvodnjo, prometom in distribucijo orožja malega kalibra in lahkega strelnega orožja ter korupcijo tako v državah v razvoju kot v razvitih državah,
K. whereas due attention should be given to the link between the illicit manufacture, transfer and circulation of SALW and corruption practices in both developing and developed countries,
L. ker korupcije ni mogoče zajeziti brez ozaveščanja in sodelovanja civilne družbe in ker je dostop do vseh informacij v tem procesu ključnega pomena,
L. whereas curbing corruption is impossible without the awareness and participation of civil society and whereas access to all the information is crucial in this process,
M. ker je Konvencija ZN o boju proti korupciji iz leta 2003 prvi mednarodni pravni instrument, ki priznava potrebo po tem, da se vse države zavežejo k vračanju premoženja, in ker sta med državami članicami EU to konvencijo ratificirali le Francija in Madžarska,
M. whereas the 2003 UN Convention Against Corruption is the first international legal instrument to recognise the need for all States to commit to asset repatriation, and whereas the only EU Member States that have ratified this Convention are Hungary and France,
2. poudarja, da je treba nameniti več pozornosti vlogi civilne družbe pri spodbujanju dobrega upravljanja in prostovoljni kontroli korupcije;
Stresses that increased attention should be paid to the role of the civil society in fostering good governance and voluntary control of corruption;
5. poudarja pomembnost vloge, ki jo lahko imajo neodvisna javna občila v boju proti korupciji, in poziva k večji podpori EU za projekte, ki podpirajo in krepijo tovrstna občila v državah partnericah;
Stresses the important role that a free and independent media can play in the fight against corruption and calls for greater EU support for projects assisting or strengthening such media in partner countries;
15. poziva k večji preglednosti v programih proračunske pomoči, ki jo dodeli EU, vključno z objavo pomembnih informacij o pomoči, porabljeni v državi prejemnici, vključevanjem parlamentov in obveščanjem civilne družbe v tem procesu;
Calls for more transparency in programmes for budget aid granted by the EU, including publication of the relevant information about the aid spent in the recipient country, and by involving parliaments and informing civil players in this process;
17. meni, da bi morali oblikovati posebne socialne kazalnike za pridobitev natančnejših podatkov o kakovosti upravljanja, ki jo dosegajo države, in poziva, naj bo civilna družba obsežneje vključena v to področje;
Considers that specific social indicators should be devised for the purpose of obtaining more precise data on the quality of governance achieved by the countries in question and calls for civil society to be more extensively involved in this area;
27. poziva Komisijo in države članice k vzpostavitvi mednarodnega sistema črnih list, ki bi bankam preprečil posojanje večjih vsot denarja podkupljivim režimom ali posameznikom, ki predstavljajo vlado;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to establish an international system of blacklisting to prevent banks from lending large sums of money to corrupt regimes or individuals representing a government;
29. poudarja, da obstaja velika nevarnost korupcije v postopkih za oddajo javnih naročil, zato je treba kot prednostno nalogo spodbujati preglednost predpisov o javnih naročilih;
Stresses that there are major corruption risks involved in public procurement procedures and that, consequently, transparent procurement rules and procedures should be promoted as a key priority;
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o oceni evropskega naloga za prijetje
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on evaluation of the European arrest warrant
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU (B6‑0455/2005)................................................................9
DRAFT RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL (B6‑0455/2005).....................................9
o oceni evropskega naloga za prijetje
on evaluation of the European arrest warrant
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga vlaga Adeline Hazan v imenu skupine PSE o oceni evropskega naloga za prijetje( B6‑0455/2005 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Adeline Hazan on behalf of the PSE Group on evaluation of the European arrest warrant ( B6‑0455/2005 ),
- ob upoštevanju Amsterdamske pogodbe, v kateri je prvič zapisan cilj vzpostavitve evropskega sodnega prostora,
– having regard to the Treaty of Amsterdam, which for the first time textually enshrined the objective of establishing a European judicial area,
- ob upoštevanju zaključkov vrha v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999, kjer je bilo načelo vzajemnega priznavanja sprejeto kot temeljni kamen pravosodnega sodelovanja,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Tampere summit of 15 and 16 October 1999, which established the principle of mutual recognition as the cornerstone of judicial cooperation,
- ob upoštevanju okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 6. februarja 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami
– having regard to its resolution of 6 February 2002 on the draft Council framework decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States
UL C 284, 21.11.2002, str.
OJ C 284, 21.11.2002, p.
- ob upoštevanju okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/JAI Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami
– having regard to the Council framework decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States
- ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije na podlagi člena 34 okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami (KOM 2005/0063),
– having regard to the Commission's report based on Article 34 of the Council framework decision of 13 June 2002 ( COM(2005)0063 ),
- ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije, ki temelji na členu 34 okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 (KOM(2006) 0008),
– having regard to the Commission's report based on Article 34 of the Council framework decision of 13 June 2002 (COM(2006) 0008),
- ob upoštevanju sodbe ustavnega sodišča Poljske (27. april 2005), Zvezne republike Nemčije (18. julij 2005) in Cipra (7. november 2005) ter nekaterih postopkov v teku, zlasti postopka pred belgijskim arbitražnim sodiščem,
– having regard to the judgments of the constitutional courts of Poland (27 April 2005), Germany (18 July 2005) and Cyprus (7 November 2005) and the various procedures under way, notably that before the Belgian Court of Arbitration,
- ob upoštevanju parlamentarnega srečanja 17. in 18. oktobra 2005 o boljšem parlamentarnem nadzoru na področju pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja v Evropi, na katerem se je zbralo okoli sto predstavnikov nacionalnih parlamentov in članov Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve,
– having regard to the parliamentary meeting held on 17 and 18 October 2005 on improving parliamentary control of judicial and police cooperation in Europe, with the participation of 100 national parliamentarians and members of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs,
– ob upoštevanju člena 114, odstavek 1 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 114(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0049/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0049/2006 ),
A. ker je evropski nalog za prijetje inovativen in spodbuden zgled, ki lahko pozitivno vpliva na razvoj pravosodnega sodelovanja, krepitev medsebojnega zaupanja in javne svoboščine,
A. having regard to the innovative and exemplary role of the European arrest warrant in the development of judicial cooperation and the strengthening of mutual trust, as well as its direct impact on the liberties of the public,
B. ker evropski nalog za prijetje ostaja eno od glavnih orodij Evropske unije na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja in boja proti terorizmu ter proti hudim oblikam kriminala,
B. whereas the European arrest warrant remains one of the EU's key instruments for judicial cooperation and the fight against terrorism and large-scale crime,
C. ker se je po ugotovitvah, ki jih prinaša prva ocena Komisije, evropski nalog za prijetje izkazal kot učinkovit v primerjavi s postopkom izročitve, ki je počasen, težaven in dandanašnji zastarel; ker omejuje možnost, da bi obtoženec ušel roki pravice zaradi "suverenosti sodstva", kar dalje omogoča bolj učinkovit boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu ali terorizmu,
C. whereas the Commission's initial evaluation shows that the European arrest warrant has demonstrated its effectiveness by comparison with the slow, cumbersome and out-of-date extradition procedure, while also making it possible to reduce the risks of a defendant or sentenced person eluding justice for reasons of 'legal sovereignty', as well as to fight organised crime and terrorism more effectively,
D. ker je, za razliko od (postopka) izročitve, ena od smernic evropskega naloga za prijetje odprava vmešavanja političnih organov v postopek,
D. whereas one of the advances introduced by the European arrest warrant is, precisely, the removal of interference by the political authorities in the procedure, by contrast with the extradition procedure,
E. ker je več držav članic izrazilo željo, da bi ohranile tradicionalne elemente izročitve (denimo nadzor dvojne kaznivosti, vmešavanje političnih oblasti v sodne postopke) oziroma dodale nove razloge za neizvršitev, ki so v nasprotju z okvirnim sklepom 2002/584/JAI (denimo politični razlogi, nacionalna varnost ali spoštovanje temeljnih pravic),
E. having regard to the wishes expressed by several Member States concerning retention of certain elements of the traditional extradition system (controls to avoid double jeopardy, intervention of the political authorities in the judicial procedure) or introducing additional grounds for rejection which would be contrary to Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, such as political reasons, national security or human rights arguments,
F. ker se pri izvajanju evropskega naloga za prijetje porajajo povsem praktične ovire , med katerimi naj omenimo prevajanje, posredovanje ali uporaba različnih obrazcev, sorazmerno nezdružljivih z zahtevami evropskega naloga za prijetje,
F. having regard to the practical obstacles that have been encountered in the operation of the European arrest warrant, including problems of translation, transmission or use of differing forms incompatible with its criteria,
G. ker v več državah članicah prihaja do težav pri prenosu (primer Nemčije) in ker je treba nacionalna ustavna besedila uskladiti z okvirnim sklepom 2002/584/JAI, da bi na ta način omogočili predajo državljanov (primer Poljske in Cipra),
G. having regard to the difficulties of transposition encountered by several Member States (especially Germany) and to the need to bring national constitutions into line with Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA in order to permit the surrender of nationals (in particular in Poland and Cyprus),
H. ker obstaja bojazen, da bi omenjene težave lahko izpodkopale medsebojno zaupanje in sprožile verižno reakcijo, ki bi postavila pod vprašaj uporabo evropskega naloga o prijetju v drugih državah članicah, kot to kaže dejstvo, da je zaradi sklepa nemškega ustavnega sodišča, ki je razveljavilo zakonodajo za prenos okvirnega sklepa, več držav članic dalo vedeti, da bodo morale pred izdajo evropskega naloga za prijetje in dokler ne bo sprejet nov zakon o prenosu, skladen s temeljnim zakonom, začasno ponovno uporabiti prej veljavne instrumente izročitve,
H. concerned that these problems may undermine mutual trust and lead to a chain reaction which could threaten the implementation of the European arrest warrant by other Member States, as is demonstrated by the fact that, following the decision by the German Constitutional Court to annul the legislation transposing the framework decision, a number of Member States have indicated that they will have to return to applying, on a transitional basis, the extradition instruments that existed before the entry into force of the European arrest warrant, pending adoption of a new transposing law that is compatible with the Basic Law,
I. ker je nezadostno medsebojno zaupanje med sodniki posledica nezadostnih minimalnih standardov Skupnosti v kazenskih postopkih, kar zmanjšuje učinkovitost pravosodnega sodelovanja,
I. whereas the lack of mutual trust between courts is associated with the shortage of common minimum standards in criminal procedures, which hampers effective judicial cooperation,
J. ker želi opozoriti, da izgradnja območja svobode, varnosti in pravice temelji na medsebojnem zaupanju in je nemogoča brez ustreznega minimalnega približevanja nacionalnih zakonodaj, kot je Evropski parlament poudaril v resoluciji z dne 15. februarja 2005
J. whereas the creation of the European area of freedom, security and justice based on mutual trust cannot be conceived without a minimum degree of harmonisation of national law, as Parliament has stressed in its resolution of 15 February 2005
Sprejeta besedila na ta dan, P6_TA(2005)0030 . ,
Texts adopted on that date, P6_TA(2005)0030 ,
K. ker je prva ocena Komisije (KOM(2005/0063) zajemala le 24 držav članic in jo je bilo mogoče šele nedavno dopolniti glede Italije ( KOM(2006)0008 ), zadnje države članice, ki še mora prenesti okvirni sklep 2002/584/JAI,
K. whereas the Commission's first evaluation ( COM(2005)0063 ) concerned only 24 Member States and was completed for Italy, the last Member State to transpose framework decision 2002/584/JHA, only recently ( COM(2006)0008 ),
L. ker se je med razpravo na parlamentarnem srečanju 17. in 18. oktobra 2005 izkazalo, da so si težave, s katerimi se pri prenosu srečujejo države članice, precej podobne, in ker bo v prihodnosti nujno treba povečati izmenjavo podatkov ter okrepiti sodelovanje med nacionalnimi parlamenti in Evropskim parlamentom, da bi zagotovili ustrezen prenos okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/JAI in nekaterih drugih sklepov, ki se še proučujejo,
L. whereas the transposition problems encountered by Member States are essentially of a similar nature, as is evident from the debates which took place at the parliamentary meeting of 17 and 18 October 2005; whereas in future fuller exchanges of information and closer cooperation between the national parliaments and the European Parliament will be necessary with a view to ensuring the transposition in correct conditions of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA and of other texts still under consideration,
K. ker je žal vloga Evropskega parlamenta pri sprejemanju evropskega naloga o prijetju omejena in ker sta omejena tudi ocena ter nadzor Sodišča pri njegovem izvajanju, to pa zaradi dejstva, da gre za instrument "tretjega stebra", ki temelji na členih 31 in 34 Pogodbe EU (naslov VI),
N. regretting the fact that the role of Parliament in the adoption of the European arrest warrant and in its evaluation, and the control of its application by the European Court of Justice, are limited by its status as a third-pillar instrument based on Articles 31 and 34 of the EU Treaty,
O. ker bi bilo prav, da se trenutno veljavne pogodbe uporabljajo v celoti in je torej treba pričeti z izvajanjem povezave iz člena 42 Pogodbe EU, ki predvideva možnost, da se države članice odločijo vključiti evropski nalog za prijetje v "prvi steber", zato da bi zagotovile demokratičen nadzor s strani Evropskega parlamenta in sodni nadzor s strani Sodišča evropskih skupnosti,
O. having regard to the need to apply the Treaties currently in force in full, and, accordingly, to implement the 'passerelle' referred to in Article 42 of the EU Treaty, which provides for the possibility of Member States deciding to bring the European arrest warrant under the first pillar, in order to ensure democratic control by the European Parliament and judicial control by the European Court of Justice,