natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Simazin mora biti opredeljen kot prednostna nevarna snov.
Simazine should be identified as priority hazardous.
PRILOGA II Priloga X, razpredelnica, vrstica 31 (direktiva 2000/60/ES)
ANNEX II Annex X, line 31 (Directive 2000/60/EC)
Zaradi verjetne obstojnosti in "bioakumulativnosti" so triklorobenzeni strupene snovi, ki še vedno vzbujajo skrb.
Trichlorobenzene is likely to be persistent and bioaccumulative, and it is classified as toxic, which gives rise to an equivalent level of concern.
Komisija v svoji oceni učinkov izjavlja, da bi po mnenju izvedencev snovi lahko bile opredeljene kot "prednostne nevarne", vendar do sedaj ni ukrepala zaradi verjetnih posledic take odločitve.
The Commission states in its impact assessment that trichlorobenzene, on the basis of expert judgement, could be identified as 'priority hazardous' due to its 'equivalent level of concern'.
Triklorobenzeni morajo biti opredeljeni kot prednostne nevarne snovi.
Trichlorobenzene should be identified as priority hazardous.
PRILOGA II Priloga X, razpredelnica, vrstica 33 (direktiva 2000/60/ES)
ANNEX II Annex X, line 33 (Directive 2000/60/EC)
Znano je, da je trifluralin, ki se nahaja v usedlinah in v zemlji, verjetno bioakumulativen in strupen.
Trifluralin persists in sediment and soil, and there is broad agreement that it is likely to be bioaccumulative and toxic.
V skladu z definicijo v členu 2, točki 29 okvirne direktive bi ga bilo potrebno opredeliti kot "prednostno nevarno snov".
In line with the definitions of the water framework directive for 'hazardous substances' in Article 2(29), it should therefore be identified as a priority hazardous substance.
PRILOGA X, RAZPREDELNICA, VNOSI OD 33 A DO 33 I (novo)
ANNEX X, TABLE, LINES 33 A TO 33 I (new)
Številka EU 2
EU number 2
se ne uporablja
not applicable
DDT skupaj 1
DDT total 1
DDT skupaj obsega vsoto izomerov:1,1,1-trikloro-2,2 bis (p-klorofenyl) etan (številka CAS 50-29-3 EU številka 200-024-3; 1,1,1-trikloro-2 (o-klorofenil)-2-(p-klorofenil) etan (številka CAS 789-02-6); EU številka 212-332-5); 1,1-dikloro-2,2 bis (p-klorofenil) etilen (številka CAS 72-55-9); EU številka 200-784-6) in 1,1-dikloro-2,2 bis (p-klorofenil) etan (številka CAS 72-54-8); EU številka 200-783-0).
DDT total comprises the sum of the isomers 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2 bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethane (CAS number 50-29-3; EU number 200-024-3); 1,1,1-trichloro-2 (o-chlorophenyl)-2-(p-chlorophenyl) ethane (CAS number 789-02-6; EU number 212-332-5); 1,1-dichloro-2,2 bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethylene (CAS number 72-55-9; EU number 200-784-6); and 1,1-dichloro-2,2 bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethane (CAS number 72-54-8; EU number 200-783-0).
Priloga X, razpredelnica (nova) (Direktiva 2000/60/ES)
Annex X, table (new) (Directive 2000/60/EC)
Priority Hazardous substances
Priority Hazardous substances
Prosti cianid
Free Cyanide
4-metilbenziliden kamfor
4-Methylbenzylidene camphor
Mošusov keton
Musk ketone
Mošusov ksilen
Musk xylene
Perfluorirane sestavine (PFCs)
Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs)
Perfluorooktan sulfonat (PFOS)
Perfluorooctane sulphonic acid (PFOS)
Kalijeva sol
Potassium salt
Amonijeva sol
Ammonium salt
Litijeva sol
Lithium salt
Perfluorooktanojska kislina (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Amonijev perfluorooktan (APFO)
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO)
(*****) Preveriti je treba, ali je to prednostno snov mogoče opredeliti kot prednostno nevarno snov.
(*****) This priority substance is subject to a review for identification as a possible “priority hazardous substance”.
Komisija bo najpozneje 12 mesecev od začetka veljave te direktive Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predlagala dokončno razvrstitev te snovi brez poseganja v časovni razpored iz člena 16 Direktive 2000/60/ES za predloge Komisije o nadzoru.
The Commission will make a proposal to the Parliament and the Council for its final classification not later than 12 months after the entry into force of this Directive, without prejudice to the timetable laid down in Article 16 of Directive 2000/60/EC for the Commission's proposals for controls.
(*****) To snov naj se opredeliti kot "prednostno snov".
(******) This substance is subject to identification as a possible “priority substance”.
Potreba po tej direktivi izhaja iz obveznosti, zapisani v direktivi, ki vzpostavlja okvir za politiko Skupnosti na področju voda.
The justification for this Directive derives from a requirement contained in the Directive establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
V svojem členu 16 okvirna direktiva našteva različne obveznosti, ki zadevajo oblikovanje predlogov Evropske komisije, kot so posebni ukrepi proti onesnaževanju vode z nekaterimi onesnaževali ali skupinami onesnaževal, ki pomenijo znatno tveganje za vodno okolje ali tveganje, ki se prenaša po vodnem okolju, sestava seznama prednostnih snovi, vključno z nevarnimi prednostnimi snovmi, pa tudi določanje kakovostnih standardov, ki veljajo za koncentracije prednostnih snovi v površinskih vodah, usedlinah ali organizmih.
Article 16 of that framework directive lists various obligations relating to the Commission's drawing-up of proposals, including specific measures to combat water pollution by individual pollutants or groups of pollutants that pose a significant risk to or via the aquatic environment, establishing a list of priority substances, including priority hazardous substances and also setting quality standards applicable to the concentrations of priority substances in surface water, sediments and biota.
Okoljski standardi kakovosti so koncentracije posameznega onesnaževala ali skupine onesnaževal v vodi, usedlinah ali organizmih, ki naj ne bi bile presežene, da se zavarujeta zdravlje ljudi in okolje (člen 2, točka 35 okvirne direktive).
Those environmental quality standards are the levels of concentration of a pollutant or group of pollutants in water, sediments or biota that should not be exceeded in order to protect human health and the environment (Article 2(35) of the framework-directive).
Predlagana direktiva določa torej meje koncentracije v površinskih vodah za 41 vrst pesticidov, težkih kovin in drugih nevarnih kemičnih snovi, ki predstavljajo posebno tveganje za vodne živali in rastline ter za zdravje ljudi.
The proposed directive therefore sets surface water concentration limits for 41 pesticides, heavy metals and other hazardous chemical substances of particular risk to aquatic fauna and flora and human health.
Treba je torej pojasniti zvezo med tema dvema besediloma in odpraviti dvoumnosti.
The links between these two texts should therefore be clarified and any ambiguities removed.
Treba je zlasti oceniti cilje in predlagane ukrepe za njihovo dosego glede na obveznosti, naštete v okvirni direktivi, treba pa je tudi ceniti njeno primernost.
In particular, the objectives and the measures proposed to attain these should be assessed in the light of the obligations set out in the framework directive, and their relevance appraised.
S tem v zvezi želi poročevalka poudariti, da je ta hčerinska direktiva del celostnega pristopa, namenjenega boju proti širjenju določenih snovi, opredeljenih kot prednostne, v površinskih vodah.
In this regard, your rapporteur would emphasise that this daughter directive is part of an global approach intended to combat the release of certain priority substances into surface waters.
Poglavitni cilj tega besedila torej ni ta, da določi merila za pitnost vode.
The main aim of this text is not, therefore, to establish criteria relating to drinking water quality.
Komisija ni predlagala nadzornih ukrepov za izpuste, ker je menila, da se nanje nanašajo že druga besedila (REACH, IPPC,...).
The Commission did not bring forward measures on the control of discharges, holding that various texts relate to this (REACH, IPPC, etc.).
Vendar je treba zagotoviti, da niso ti ukrepi med seboj v protislovju, se ne prekrivajo in predvsem da ni virov emisij, izpustov ali uhajanj, ki bi bili iz njih izpuščeni, ob upoštevanju posebnih okoliščin, kjer so nekatere snovi zgodovinsko in naravno prisotne.
Nevertheless, it must be ensured that these measures do not contradict one another or overlap, and above all that there are no sources of emission, discharge or loss that are not covered, while bearing in mind specific situations in which certain substances are historically or naturally present.
Predlog Komisije uvaja razlikovanje med prednostnimi snovmi in drugimi onesnaževali.
The Commission proposal makes a distinction between priority substances and other pollutants.
To razlikovanje povzroča samo zmedo, zato poročevalka predlaga, se teh osem "drugih onesnaževal" vključi med prednostne snovi ter da se jih vpiše kot nevarne prednostne snovi glede na njihov dejanski učinek.
That distinction simply creates confusion, and your rapporteur therefore suggests that these eight 'other pollutants' be reclassified as priority substances and even, in view of their intrinsic effects, as priority hazardous substances.
Izpostaviti je treba tudi poseben položaj pristaniških območij.
The special case of port areas must also be addressed.
Na pristaniških območjih se neraztopljene snovi hitro premikajo zaradi bagranja.
Ports are areas that witness major changes in levels of suspended substances as a result of dredging.
Treba je torej najti ustrezno rešitev za te posebne primere.
An suitable response must therefore be provided to those special circumstances.
Poročevalka poziva Komisijo, naj obravnava primere onesnaževanja, ki izvirajo iz tretjih držav.
Your rapporteur calls on the Commission to address the issue of pollution originating from third countries.
Prav tako meni, da je treba o nekaterih vprašanjih še razpravljati.
Lastly, your rapporteur considers that certain issues warrant further debate.
Nekateri sogovorniki, s katerimi sem se srečala, ko sem pripravljala to poročilo, so izrazili svoje začudenje zaradi nekaterih vrednosti okoljskih standardov kakovosti, ki ne ustrezajo metodologiji, opisani v dokumentih, ki so bili na voljo preko sistema CIRCA (Communication & Information Resource Centre Administrator).
Some of the persons consulted during the preparation of this report in fact expressed their astonishment at some EQS values which did not tally with the methodology described in the documents available on CIRCA (Communication & Information Resource Centre Administrator).
Poročevalka poudarja, da je potrebna tehnična razprava o naslednjih snoveh: benzenu, kadmiju, heksaklorobenzenu, heksaklorobutadienu, živem srebru, niklju, svincu, PAH.
Your rapporteur would therefore stress the need for technical discussions on the following substances: benzene, cadmium, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorobutadiene, mercury, nickel, lead and PAHs.
Iz omenjenih razprav izhaja zlasti nestrinjanje z vrednostmi OSK 0,05 µg.L-1 za živo srebro, ker ne upošteva sekundarnega zastrupljanja zaradi metil živega srebra, in 0,2 µg.L-1 za kadmij.
The persons consulted disagreed, in particular, with the EQS values of 0,05 µg.L-1 for mercury, which would fail to take into account secondary poisoning associated with methylmercury, and of 0,2 µg.L-1 for cadmium.
Kar zadeva naključna onesnaževanja, morajo biti možne izjeme, ki jih predvideva ta direktiva, skladne z okvirno direktivo o vodah, in jih mora Komisija zato pojasniti.
Concerning instances of accidental pollution, the exemptions possible under this directive should be consistent with the Water Framework Directive and must therefore be clarified by the Commission.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o okoljskih standardih kakovosti na področju vodne politike in spremembi Direktive 2000/60/ES
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC
Z okvirno direktivo o vodah
The Water Framework Directive
1. , sprejeto leta 2000, je bila določena strategija za preprečevanje in nadzor kemičnega onesnaževanja voda.
1. , which was adopted in 2000, stipulated a strategy to prevent and control the chemical pollution of water.
Od držav članic je glede površinskih voda zahtevala, da preprečijo slabšanje kakovosti površinskih voda, uresničenje ciljev okoljske kakovosti do leta 2015 ter zmanjšanje ali postopno odpravo izpustov, emisij in uhajanja "prednostnih snovi" in "prednostnih nevarnih snovi" do leta 2025.
With regards to surface waters, Member States were required to prevent the deterioration of the quality of surface waters, to achieve targets for environmental quality by 2015, and to reduce/ phase out the discharges, emissions and losses of 'priority substances' and 'priority hazardous substances' by 2025.
Vendar takrat "prednostne (nevarne) snovi" ter okoljska kakovost niso bile natančno opredeljene.
However, at that time, the precise definitions of 'priority (hazardous) substances' and of environmental quality were left out.
Leta 2001 je Komisija deloma zapolnila vrzel z opredelitvijo snovi, ki zahtevajo posebno skrb
In 2001, the Commission partly filled in this gap, by identifying the substances of particular concern
UL L 331, 15.12.2001, str.
OJ L 331, 15.12.2001, p.
(33 "prednostnih snovi", od katerih jih je 25 potencialno nevarnih).
(33 'priority substances', of which 25 potential hazardous).
Namen tega predloga je zapolniti še preostale vrzeli z določitvijo okoljskih standardov kakovosti (zgornje meje, da se preprečijo kratkoročne nepopravljive posledice, ter najvišjega letnega povprečja, da se preprečijo dolgoročni in trajni učinki), z oblikovanjem popisov, da se preveri, ali so bili izpolnjeni cilji zmanjšanja in/ali odprave izpustov, emisij in uhajanja snovi, ki zahtevajo posebno skrb, ter z oblikovanjem seznama 13 "prednostnih nevarnih snovi".
This proposal aims at filling the remaining gap by establishing environmental quality standards (both a maximum limit to avoid short term irreversible consequences, and a maximum annual average to avoid long term and chronic effects), creating an inventory to check whether the objectives of reduction and/or cessation of discharges, emissions and losses of substances of particular concern are met, and establishing a list of 13 'priority hazardous substances'.
Pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja predlog.
Your draftsman welcomes this proposal.
Voda je pomemben naravni vir, ki se uporablja za pitje, v industriji in kmetijstvu ter jo je treba varovati za uporabo danes in v prihodnje.
Water is an important natural resource, which is used for drinking water, and by industry and agriculture, and should be protected for present and future use.
S tem predlogom se bodo predvidoma zmanjšali stroški za obdelavo pitne vode ter povečale možnosti industrije, da zagotavlja čiste tehnologije.
This proposal is expected to reduce the costs of drinking water treatment, and to increase opportunities for industries providing cleaner technologies.
Poleg tega se bo s predlogom zaradi razveljavitve 5 starejših direktiv zmanjšalo upravno breme ter poenostavila zakonodaja, kar bo prispevalo k cilju Evropske unije za "boljšo zakonodajo" .
In addition, due to the repeal of 5 older directives, the proposal will reduce the administrative burden and simplify the legislation and therefore contribute to the “Better Regulation” objective of the European Union.
Vendar je pripravljavec mnenja prepričan, da je treba pozitivne vidike uravnotežiti z velikim nerešenim izzivom industriji zaradi nujnih dodatnih naložb.
However, your draftsman believes that these positive aspects should be balanced with the pending huge challenge for industry due to the necessary additional investments.
Najprej v okvirni direktivi o vodah posebne določbe omogočajo prilagodljivost pri zgoraj navedenih rokih in okoljskih standardih ter odstopanja od njih zaradi tehnične izvedljivosti, nesorazmernih stroškov, naravnih pogojev ali socialnoekonomskih potreb.
Firstly, in the Water Framework Directive specific provisions were made to allow flexibility in and derogations from the above mentioned deadlines and environmental standards for reasons of technical feasibility, disproportionate costs, natural conditions or socioeconomic needs.
Predpogoj za uživanje dvojnih koristi boljšega varstva in gospodarskega razvoja je podrobnejša pravna pojasnitev glede uporabe teh določb v tej direktivi.
The precondition for harvesting the double benefit of improved protection and economic development is further legal clarification of the use of these provisions within this Directive.
Poleg tega so na seznamu prednostnih snovi navedene snovi, ki se pojavljajo v naravi.
Furthermore, the list of priority substances includes substances that occur in nature.
To predstavlja izziv za industrijsko proizvodnjo, kjer se uporabljajo surovine, ki bodo vedno vsebovale sledove teh snovi, njihovi delci pa se bodo sčasoma sprostili zaradi termodinamičnih zakonov ter omejitev razpoložljive tehnologije pri nadzoru.
This poses a challenge for industrial production using raw materials, which will always contain traces of these substances, parts of which will eventually be released due to thermodynamical laws and limitations of available control technology.
Zato je treba okrepiti navedbe glede uporabe najboljše razpoložljive tehnologije, kot določa Direktiva 96/61/ES.
To this end references to the application of best available technology as provided in Directive 96/61/EC shall be strengthened.
Pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja dejstvo, da predlog ne določa novega nadzora nad emisijami ter da državam članicam omogoča največjo raven prilagodljivosti pri izbiri izvedbenih ukrepov za uresničevanje okoljskih ciljev.
Your draftsman welcomes the fact that the proposal does not contain new emission controls and allows a maximum of flexibility for Member States in choosing the implementing measures to achieve the environmental objectives.
Vendar bi lahko bil v izjemnih primerih nov ukrep Skupnosti učinkovitejši.
However, in exceptional cases new Community action might be more efficient.
Take odločitve morajo temeljiti na obširnem posvetovanju med Komisijo, državami članicami in zainteresiranimi stranmi.
Such decisions should be based on an extensive consultation between the Commission, the Member States and stakeholders.
V ta namen se lahko uporabi postopek, predviden v členu 12 okvirne direktive o vodah.
The procedure foreseen in Article 12 of the Water Framework Directive could be used for that aim.
Varovanje in gospodarska dejavnost morata biti v ravnovesju.
Protection and economic activity should be balanced.
S tega vidika je dobrodošla določitev okoljskih standardov kakovosti (OSK) za varstvo pri neposrednih in posrednih učinkih ter bo prispevala k ciljem varstva in minimalnega bremena za države članice in gospodarstvo.
From this perspective, the setting up of environmental quality standards (EQS) being protective with respect to direct and indirect effect is welcome and will serve both the goals of protection and minimum burden for Member States and economy.
Kjer takih standardov še ni mogoče določiti, se izbranega koncepta ne sme opustiti.
Where such EQS can not yet be defined, the chosen concept should not be abandoned.
V takih primerih in ko imajo obravnavane snovi bioakumulativne lastnosti, je treba namesto uvedbe OSK za potencialno ogrožena področja ta skrbno spremljati, da se prepreči bistveno poslabšanje ter si še naprej prizadevati za ohranjanje splošnih zaščitnih OSK.
In such cases and when the substances concerned exhibit bioaccumulative properties, instead of introducing EQS for the compartments possibly under risk, these should be monitored to avoid significant deterioration whilst work on overall protective EQS shall be continued.
Nerešena vprašanja o uporabi OSK pri usedlinah in živih organizmih v kombiniranem pristopu, posredniška narava takih OSK ter prevlada koncepta splošnih zaščitnih OSK zahtevajo ustrezne prilagoditve v predlogu te direktive.
The unresolved questions of using EQS on sediments and biota in the combined approach, the intermediary nature of such EQS and the superiority of the concept of overall protective EQS, together call for corresponding readjustments in the proposal for this Directive.
Pripravljavec mnenja nasprotuje absolutnemu preprečevanju slabšanja.
Your draftsman objects to the absolute prevention of deterioration.
To bi presegalo koncept preprečevanja slabšanja, kot je določen v obstoječi zakonodaji Skupnosti, ter onemogočilo trajnostno upravljanje voda.
This would exceed the concept of the prevention of deterioration as stipulated in the Existing Community legislation and render sustainable water management impossible.
Končno pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja praktični pristop Komisije, da določi jasne, usklajene in zavezujoče standarde na ravni Skupnosti ter tako prepreči izkrivljanje trga.
Finally, your draftsman welcomes the practical approach chosen by the Commission to set clear, harmonised and binding standards on Community level, avoiding market distortion.
Vendar to velja tudi za oceno statusa kakovosti vode ter uporabo najvišjih dovoljenih koncentracij v kombiniranem pristopu iz člena 10 okvirne direktive o vodah.
But this applies also to the assessment of the water quality status and to the use of allowable maximum concentrations within the combined approach of Article 10 of the Water Framework Directive.
Pri obeh obstaja več možnosti praktične uporabe, ki lahko dajo različne rezultate.
For both, several options of practical application exist, which could lead to different results.
Brez usklajenih in obveznih metod ni mogoče uvesti enakih pogojev.
Without harmonised and compulsory methods a level playing field cannot be established.
Posebej je treba obravnavati primere, ko se predlagani okoljski standardi kakovosti ne ujemajo z analitičnimi metodami z dovolj nizkimi mejami določljivosti.
Special consideration has to be given to the cases where the proposed EQS are not matched by analytical methods with sufficient low limits of quantification.
(4) Od leta 2000 so bili sprejeti številni akti Skupnosti, ki vsebujejo ukrepe za nadzor nad onesnaževanjem v skladu s členom 16(6) Direktive 2000/60/ES za posamezne prednostne snovi.
(4) There have been adopted numerous Community acts since 2000 which constitute pollution control measures in accordance with Article 16(6) of Directive 2000/60/EC for individual priority substances.
Treba je navesti člen 16(6) in ne člena 16 na splošno, saj člen 16(6) izrecno navaja potrebo po stroškovno ugodnem in sorazmernem nadzoru.
Reference should not be made to Article 16 in general but to Article 16 (6), that expresses explicitly the need for cost-effective and proportionate control measure.
Seveda so na seznamu snovi v prilogah I in II tudi snovi, ki se pojavljajo v naravi (npr. kovine), katerih sledi najdemo povsod.
The substance lists of Annex I and Annex II contain naturally occurring substances (e.g. metals), whose traces are ubiquitous.
Ta vidik je treba poudariti, da bo potrebni nadzor operativen.
To render the controls being called for operational, this aspect must be highlighted.
(5) V zvezi z nadzorom nad emisijami prednostnih snovi iz točkovnih in razpršenih virov iz člena 16(6) in (8) Direktive 2000/60/ES se zdi stroškovno učinkoviteje in proporcionalno, da države članice v program ukrepov vključijo, kjer je potrebno, ob izvajanju druge zakonodaje Skupnosti, primerne nadzorne ukrepe, ki se v skladu s členom 11 Direktive 2000/60/ES razvijejo za vsako povodje.
(5) As regards emission controls of priority substances from point and diffuse sources as referred to in Article 16(6) and (8) of Directive 2000/60/EC, it seems more cost-effective and proportionate for Member States to include, where necessary, in addition to the implementation of other existing Community legislation, appropriate control measures in the programme of measures to be developed for each river basin in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 2000/60/EC.