natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(5) V zvezi z nadzorom nad emisijami prednostnih snovi iz točkovnih in razpršenih virov iz člena 16(6) in (8) Direktive 2000/60/ES se zdi stroškovno učinkoviteje in proporcionalno, da države članice v program ukrepov vključijo, kjer je potrebno, ob izvajanju druge zakonodaje Skupnosti, primerne nadzorne ukrepe, ki se v skladu s členoma 10 in 11 Direktive 2000/60/ES razvijejo za vsako povodje.
(5) As regards emission controls of priority substances from point and diffuse sources as referred to in Article 16(6) and (8) of Directive 2000/60/EC, it seems more cost-effective and proportionate for Member States to include, where necessary, in addition to the implementation of other existing Community legislation, appropriate control measures in the programme of measures to be developed for each river basin in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Namen predloga spremembe je preprečiti slabitev zahteve iz člena 10 okvirne direktive o vodah, ki poleg najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij zahteva strožji nadzor nad emisijami, kjer je to potrebno zaradi izpolnjevanja okoljskih standardov kakovosti.
This amendment seeks to avoid undermining the requirement from Article 10 of the water framework directive, which requires more stringent emission controls beyond best available techniques where this is necessary to comply with the environmental quality standards.
(5a) Če država članica ne more sama rešiti zadeve, ki vpliva na upravljanje voda, lahko o tem poroča Komisiji v skladu s členom 12 Direktive 2000/60/ES.
(5a) Where an issue which has an impact on the management of water cannot be resolved by a Member State itself, that Member State may report it to the Commission in accordance with Article 12 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Država članica lahko poroča tudi o zadevi, pri kateri so ukrepi Skupnosti očitno stroškovno ugodnejši ali ustreznejši.
A Member State should also be able to report such an issue where Community measures seem to be more cost-effective or appropriate.
V tem primeru Komisija sproži izmenjavo informacij z vsemi državami članicami in če se ukrep Skupnosti res izkaže za boljšo možnost, Komisija objavi poročilo in predlaga ukrepe.
In such a case, the Commission should launch an information exchange with all Member States and if Community action does appear to be the better option, the Commission should publish a report and propose measures.
Treba je uskladiti uporabo največjih dovoljenih koncentracij v skladu s kombiniranim pristopom iz člena 10 Direktive 2000/60/ES, zlasti obravnavo odstopajočih točk, ter določitev nadzora emisij.
The application of maximum allowable concentrations, in accordance with the combined approach laid down in Article 10 of Directive 2000/60/EC, the treatment of outliers in particular, and the determination of emission controls should be harmonised.
Najvišje dovoljene koncentracije so lahko zavajajoče zaradi odstopajočih točk ter se ne nanašajo na kakršno koli časovno obdobje, ampak so diskretne narave.
Maximum allowable concentrations are prone to bias by outliers and do not refer to any kind of time period but are of discrete nature.
(18a) Uredba (ES) Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 št. 1907/2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije 1 določa revizijo za oceno ustreznosti meril za določitev snovi, ki so obstojne, bioakumulativne in strupene.
(18a) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency 1 provides for a review to assess the adequacy of the criteria for identifying substances which are persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic.
Komisija naj ustrezno spremeni Prilogo X Direktive 2000/60/ES, takoj ko bodo spremenjena merila v Uredbi (ES) št. 1907/2006.
The Commission should amend Annex X of Directive 2000/60/EC accordingly immediately the criteria in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 are modified.
Ugotavlja se, da so merila za določitev obstojnih, bioakumulativnih in strupenih snovi v uredbi REACH pomanjkljiva.
The PBT criteria under REACH have been found to be deficient.
So namreč tako ostra, da skoraj ni snovi, opredeljenih kot obstojne, bioakumulativne in strupene.
They are so rigid that almost no PBT substances are identified.
Države članice na podlagi spremljanja stanja vode, ki se izvede v skladu s členom 8 Direktive 2000/60/ES, zagotovijo, da se koncentracije snovi v usedlinah in živih organizmih, navedene v delih A in B Priloge I, ne povečajo.
Member States shall ensure, on the basis of monitoring of water status carried out in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC, that concentrations of substances listed in Parts A and B of Annex I do not increase in sediment and biota .
Države članice spremljajo koncentracije snovi, navedenih v delih A in B Priloge I, kot je ustrezno v živih organizmih, novih usedlinah ali neraztopljenih snoveh, če imajo te snovi pomemben akumulacijski potencial na teh področjih in če okoljski standardi kakovosti za vodno fazo, določeni v delih A in B Priloge I, organizmov ne ščitijo dovolj pred sekundarnim zastrupljanjem ali bentoškimi organizmi.
Member States shall monitor concentrations of substances listed in Parts A and B of Annex I , as appropriate, in biota, recent sediments or suspended solids, if these substances exhibit a significant accumulation potential in these compartments and if the environmental quality standards for the water phase as laid down in Parts A and B of Annex I do not sufficiently protect organisms from secondary poisoning or benthic organisms .
Države članice zagotovijo, da se koncentracije spremljanih snovi bistveno ne povečajo v obdobju preverjanja za načrt upravljanja povodja iz člena 13(7) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
Member States shall ensure that the concentrations of the substances monitored do not significantly increase within the review period for a river basin management plan laid down in Article 13(7) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Države članice v vsakem primeru spremljajo heksaklorobenzen, heksaklorobutadien in metil živo srebro.
Member States shall in any event monitor hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorobutadiene and methyl-mercury.
S splošnimi zaščitnimi okoljskimi standardi za vodno fazo se upošteva previdnostno načelo, hkrati pa so stroški za spremljanje in izpolnjevanje standardov nižji.
Overall protective EQS for the water phase serve the precautionary principle but keep costs for monitoring and compliance lower.
Če taki OKS niso na voljo, iz enakih razlogov velja prepoved "bistvenega" poslabšanja (trend naraščanja), pri čemer se spremljajo koncentracije prednostnih snovi v ustreznih usedlinah, živih organizmih ali neraztopljenih snoveh.
Whilst such EQS are not available, for the same reasons as outlined before, a ban on “significant” deterioration (upward trend) shall apply, whilst the concentrations of priority substances in sediments, biota or suspended solids concerned are monitored.
"Popolna" prepoved poslabšanja bi onemogočila trajnostno upravljanje voda, hkrati pa ni predvidena v sedanji zakonodaji EU o vodah niti v sami okvirni direktivi o vodah.
An “absolute” ban on deterioration would render sustainable water management impossible and is neither foreseen by the current EU water legislation nor the Water Framework Directive itself.
ČLEN 2, ODSTAVEK 4 A (novo)
ARTICLE 2, PARAGRAPH 4 A (new)
Okoljski standardi kakovosti iz odstavkov 1 do 3 ne posegajo v zahteve Direktive Sveta 98/83/ES niti v člen 7 Direktive 2000/60/ES o vodah, ki se uporabljajo za odvzem pitne vode, ki so lahko strožje.
The environmental quality standards referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3 are without prejudice to the requirements of Council Directive 98/83/EC or of Article 7 of Directive 2000/60/EC concerning bodies of water used for the abstraction of drinking water, which may be more stringent.
V veljavnih klavzulah je treba posebej določiti, da okoljski standardi kakovosti ne posegajo v specifične zahteve Skupnosti o vodi za prehrano ljudi.
It is important to specify in the enacting clauses that the environment quality standards are without prejudice to specific Community requirements on water intended for human consumption.
ČLEN 2, ODSTAVEK 5
ARTICLE 2, PARAGRAPH 5
Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 21(2) Direktive 2000/60/ES in v dveh letih po začetku veljavnosti te direktive določi obvezne metode za izračun vsaj za zadeve iz dela C Priloge I k tej direktivi.
The Commission shall , in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 21(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC and within two years of the entry into force of this Directive, set up compulsory calculation methods at least for the matters referred to in Part C of Annex I to this Directive.
Potrebna je obvezna metodologija, da se zagotovi enaka raven zaščite ter prepreči izkrivljanje konkurence v državah članicah.
To provide the same level of protection and to avoid competition distortion across the Member States, a compulsory methodology is necessary.
Za dopolnitev ustrezne določbe člena 8(3) Direktive 2000/60/ES se uvede nespremenljiv časovni okvir za opredelitev teh metod.
To complement the corresponding provision of Article 8 (3) of Directive 2000/60/EC, a fixed timeframe to define these methods is introduced.
Države članice določijo prehodna območja prekoračitve, kjer koncentracije enega ali več onesnaževal lahko presežejo ustrezne okoljske standarde kakovosti, v kolikor ne ogrožajo skladnosti preostalega površinskega vodnega telesa s temi standardi.
Member States shall designate transitional areas of exceedance, where the concentrations of one or more pollutants may exceed the relevant environmental quality standards as far as they do not compromise the compliance of the rest of the surface water body with those standards.
Treba je jasno izraziti, da ima prednost skladnost s cilji Direktive 2000/60/ES.
It must be clearly expressed that compliance with the targets of Directive 2000/60/EC has priority.
Beseda "ogroziti" je že uporabljena v primerljivem členu 4(8) omenjene direktive.
The wording “compromise” is already used in the comparable rule of Article 4, paragraph 8 of that Directive.
Na podlagi podatkov, zbranih v skladu s členoma 5 in 8 Direktive 2000/60/ES in v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 166/2006 države članice pripravijo popis emisij, izpustov in uhajanja vseh prednostnih snovi in onesnaževal, navedenih v delih A in B Priloge I za vsako povodje ali njegov del znotraj njihovega ozemlja.
On the basis of the information collected in accordance with Articles 5 and 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC and under Regulation (EC) No. 166/2006, Member States shall establish an inventory of emissions, discharges and losses of all priority substances and pollutants listed in Parts A and B of Annex I for each river basin or its part within their territory.
Na podlagi podatkov, zbranih v skladu s členoma 5 in 8 Direktive 2000/60/ES in v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 166/2006 države članice pripravijo popis emisij, izpustov in uhajanja vseh prednostnih snovi in onesnaževal, navedenih v delih A in B Priloge I za vsako povodje ali njegov del znotraj njihovega ozemlja , skupaj z viri emisij, izpustov in uhajanj ter ustreznimi kartami .
On the basis of the information collected in accordance with Articles 5 and 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC and under Regulation (EC) No 166/2006, Member States shall establish an inventory of emissions, discharges and losses of all priority substances and pollutants listed in Parts A and B of Annex I for each river basin or its part within their territory , including the sources of the emissions, discharges and losses and relevant maps.
Države članice navedejo tudi vse ukrepe za nadzor emisij, uvedene po takih emisijah, izpustih in uhajanju prednostnih snovi in onesnaževal, navedenih v popisu.
Member States shall include all emission control measures taken following the emissions, discharges and losses of priority substances and pollutants listed in the inventory.
Treba je jasno določiti, da morajo biti v popisu navedeni viri emisij, izpustov in uhajanja prednostnih snovi in drugih onesnaževal.
It should be clearly specified that the inventory shall indicate the sources of the emissions, discharges and losses of the priority substances and other pollutants.
Zaradi boljše preglednosti jih je treba kartografirati.
These should be mapped for better transparency.
Glede na obveznosti, ki jih imajo države članice glede prenehanja ali odprave emisij, izpustov in uhajanja prednostnih snovi, kot določa člen 4(1)(a)(iv) Direktive 2000/60/ES, naj države članice v svojih popisih navedejo tudi podatke o takih ukrepih.
Given the reduction or cessation obligations on Member States concerning emissions, discharges and losses of priority substances as laid down in Article 4(1)(a)(iv) of Directive 2000/60/EC, Member States should include information about such measures in their inventory.
ČLEN 4, ODSTAVEK 2, PODODSTAVEK 2 A (novo)
ARTICLE 4, PARAGRAPH 2, SUBPARAGRAPH 2 A (new)
Državam članicam je treba omogočiti, da pokažejo rezultate "vnaprejšnjih ukrepov".
Member States should be allowed to demonstrate results from “early actions”.
Komisija pri ocenjevanju napredka upošteva te dodatne podatke.
When evaluating progress, the Commission should take this additional information into consideration.
ČLEN 4, ODSTAVEK 5, PODODSTAVEK 1 A (novo)
ARTICLE 4, PARAGRAPH 5, SUBPARAGRAPH 1 A (new)
– tehnično izvedljivost in sorazmernost;
- technical feasibility and proportionality;
– uporabo najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij;
- the application of best available techniques ;
– obstoj koncentracij v naravnem okolju.
- the existence of natural background concentrations.
Komisija pri ocenjevanju napredka držav članic glede cilja v členu 4(a)(a)(iv) Direktive 2000/60/ES upošteva pogoje, s katerimi je omejen obseg možnih ukrepov.
When evaluating the progress of Member States towards the objective of Article 4(1)(a)(iv) of Directive 2000/60/EC the Commission shall take into consideration conditions, which limit the scope of possible measures.
ČLEN 4, ODSTAVEK 6 A (novo)
ARTICLE 4, PARAGRAPH 6 A (new)
Če so ukrepi za dosego cilja v členu 4(1)(a)(iv) Direktive 2000/60/ES tehnično neizvedljivi ali nesorazmerno dragi, lahko države članice uporabijo ustrezne določbe člena 4(4) in (5) omenjene direktive.
Where measures to achieve the objective mentioned in Article 4(1)(a)(iv) of Directive 2000/60/EC are technically unfeasible or disproportionately expensive, Member Sates may apply the relevant provisions of Article 4(4) and (5) of that Directive.
Glede na sedanje besedilo je treba pojasniti uporabo člena 4(4) in (5) Direktive 2000/60/ES za doseganje cilja v členu 4(1)(a)(iv) omenjene direktive.
Due to the current wording the application of Article 4 paragraphs 4 and 5 of Directive 2000/60/EC for the achievement of the objective of Article 4 paragraph 1, a, iv of that Directive shall be clarified.
Nov nadzor Skupnosti nad emisijami
New community emission controls
Kadar država članica v skladu s členom 12(1) Direktive 2000/60/ES poroča o zadevi, ki je ni mogoče rešiti na ravni države članice, ali poroča, da se zdijo ukrepi Skupnosti stroškovno ugodnejši ali ustreznejši način reševanja te zadeve, Komisija pripravi izmenjavo informacij z vsemi državami članicami in ustreznimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, da oceni, ali je ukrep Skupnosti potreben ali bi bil stroškovno ugodnejši in ustreznejši, o tem objavi poročilo ter ga posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Where, pursuant to Article 12(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC, a Member State reports an issue which cannot be dealt with at Member State level, or reports that Community measures seem to be the more cost-effective or appropriate way of dealing with such an issue, the Commission shall organise an information exchange with all Member States and relevant stakeholders in order to evaluate whether Community action is necessary or would be more cost-effective and appropriate and shall publish a report thereof which it shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Če je v poročilu Komisije potrjeno, da je ukrep Skupnosti potreben ali stroškovno ugoden ali ustrezen, Komisija v dveh letih po objavi poročila predlaga ustrezne ukrepe.
If the Commission's report confirms the need for or cost-effectiveness or appropriateness of Community action, the Commission shall within two years of publication of the report propose adequate measures.
Dobrodošla je odločitev Komisije, da v tej direktivi ne predlaga novega nadzora Skupnosti nad emisijami v skladu s členom 16(6) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
The decision by the Commission not to propose new Community emission controls according to Article 16 paragraph 6 of Directive 2000/60/EC in this Directive is welcome.
Vendar mora biti postopek, predviden v členu 12 Direktive 2000/60/ES, dodatna možnost pri specifičnih problemih.
Nevertheless the procedure foreseen in Article 12 of Directive 2000/60/EC shall be an additional option for specific problems.
Ta predlog spremembe poudarja to možnost in določa podrobnosti tega postopka.
This amendment emphasizes this option and provides specifications for that procedure.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o okoljskih standardih kakovosti na področju vodne politike in spremembi Direktive 2000/60/ES
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC
Zakaj ta predlog Evropske komisije?
Why this Commission proposal?
Cilj okvirne direktive o vodah (the Water Framework Directive – WFD), ki je bila sprejeta decembra 2000, je preprečiti dodatno poslabšanje kakovosti vode in okrepiti varovanje vodnega okolja.
The objective of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) adopted in December 2000 is to prevent any further deterioration in the quality of waters and to strengthen protection of the aquatic environment.
Direktiva se skuša boriti proti onesnaževanju na splošno, zato predvideva postopno znižanje kemičnega onesnaževanja, zlasti ustavitev ali postopno odpravo izpustov, emisij in uhajanj prednostnih snovi in prednostnih nevarnih snovi, ki predstavljajo bodisi nesprejemljivo tveganje za vodno okolje, bodisi nesprejemljivo tveganje, ki se prenaša po vodnem okolju.
It is aimed at combating pollution generally, and provides, in that connection, for the progressive reduction of chemical pollution, and in particular the cessation or phase-out of emissions, discharges and losses of priority substances and priority hazardous substances that present unacceptable risks to or via the aquatic environment.
Izvajanje vodne politike temelji na načrtih upravljanja povodij.
Water policy is implemented on the basis of river basin management plans.
Države članice morajo izvajati potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi bodo pri vseh površinskih vodnih telesih preprečile poslabšanje stanja pa tudi obnavljale in izboljšale njihovo kakovost.
Member States are required to implement the necessary measures in order to prevent deterioration of the status of all surface water bodies and also to restore and improve their quality.
Cilj tega predloga (v skladu s členom 16(7) WFD) je z določitvijo okoljskih standardov kakovosti (OSK) na področju vodne politike preverjati in zagotoviti, da je dosežena visoka raven varovanja, torej določiti prage koncentracije, ki bodo ščitili ljudi, rastlinske in živalske vrste ter bodo temeljili na informacijah o strupenosti snovi, njeni obstojnosti in možnosti njene bioakumulacije, ter na podatkih o tem, kaj bo iz nje v okolju nastalo.
The objective of the proposal being examined - which implements Article 16(7) of the WFD - is to verify and ensure that a high level of protection has been achieved, by setting environmental quality standards (EQS) for water, namely concentration thresholds designed to protect human beings and flora and fauna on the basis of information concerning a substance's toxicity, persistence and bioaccumulation potential and data relating to its environmental fate.
Namen OSK je zaščititi in povečati kakovost okolja ter uskladiti gospodarske razmere na notranjem trgu, saj med standardi na ravni držav članic obstajajo velike razlike.
EQS are aimed at protecting and improving the quality of the environment and also at harmonising economic conditions within the internal market, given that there are major differences between the standards laid down by each of the Member States.
Onesnaževala iz kmetijstva
Pollutants of agricultural origin
Onesnaževala se izpuščajo v okolje iz različnih virov: kmetijstva, industrije (težke kovine, topila...), sežiganja itd.
Pollutants may be released into the environment from a number of sources: agriculture, industry (heavy metals, solvents, etc), incineration, etc.
Mnenje Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja se osredotoča na onesnaževanje voda iz kmetijstva, natančneje na pesticide, saj ta predlog direktive ne zadeva nitratov.
The opinion of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development will focus on pollution of agricultural origin, and, more specifically, pesticides, given that the directive does not concern nitrates.
Pogosto se za poslabšanje okoljskega stanja površinskih in obalnih vod krivijo pesticidi, saj lahko dolgo ostanejo v okolju in se lahko prenašajo na dolge razdalje.
Pesticides are frequently blamed for deterioration in the ecological status of surface and coastal waters, as they can remain present in the environment for long periods and be transported over long distances.
Gre tudi za razširjeno onesnaževanje, ki ga je težko omejiti, ker je posledica razlivanj, neposrednih uhajanj v tla in zrak, izpiranja rastlin zaradi dežja...
They are also a diffuse source of pollution which is difficult to pinpoint since it results from run off, direct losses to soil and air and leaching of crops through rainwater.
Na seznamu prednostnih snovi (priloga 1, del A) najdemo številne pesticide: 1, 3, 8, 9, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 26, 27, 29, 33.
The list of priority substances (Annex I, Part A) includes a large number of pesticides: 1, 3, 8, 9, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 26, 27, 29, 33.
Nekateri se v kmetijski dejavnosti ne uporabljajo več, vendar je v usedlinah nekaterih rek še vedno moč odkriti njihovo prisotnost.
Some of these are no longer used in farming, but it is still possible to detect their presence in sediment in some rivers.
Vseh 8 preostalih onesnaževal, ki jih zadeva ta osnutek direktive (priloga 1, del B), je pesticidov.
The eight other pollutants concerned by this proposal for a directive (Annex I, Part B) are all pesticides.
Večino naštetih točk se bo obravnavalo v besedilih o pesticidih, za katera teče postopek sprejetja.
These points are for the most part to be addressed in legislation on pesticides currently in the process of being adopted.
Stališče poročevalke
Draftswoman's position
Tega predloga direktive o okoljskih standardih kakovosti na področju vodne politike ni mogoče obravnavati samostojno, saj spada mnogo ukrepov za varovanje okolja na področje druge obstoječe zakonodaje Skupnosti ali take zakonodaje, za katero teče postopek sprejetja.
This proposal for a directive on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy cannot be looked at in isolation, as a substantial number of measures for protecting the environment fall within the scope of other Community legislative acts that either already exist or are in process of being adopted.
Zato je treba paziti, da ne bi ustvarili protislovij med cilji in določbami drugih delov zakonodaje Skupnosti in da ne bi predčasno posegali v tiste, ki bodo sprejeti v naslednjih mesecih, saj se mora vsak kos sestavljanke popolnoma ujemati z ostalimi.
It is therefore important to ensure that the objectives and provisions of this Directive do not conflict with those of other pieces of Community legislation, and not to anticipate legislation to be adopted in the coming months, in order to see to it that all of the pieces of the puzzle fit together perfectly.