natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· 7 uradnih delegacij odbora (Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija, Združene države Amerike, Nemčija, Združeno kraljestvo, Romunija, Poljska, Portugalska);
· 7 official committee delegation visits (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Romania, Poland and Portugal);
· zaslišanje približno 200 prič pred odborom ali na službenih potovanjih;
· evidence given by some 200 persons, both in committee and during missions;
· 19 preiskovanih primerov izrednih izročitev (med katerimi je treba izpostaviti neposredno pričanje štirih žrtev izročitev);
· 19 extraordinary renditions considered (with four victims of renditions giving evidence directly);
· približno 700 predloženih predlogov sprememb obeh besedil resolucije, začasnega in končnega;
· some 700 amendments tabled to both provisional and final versions of the resolution;
· na tisoče strani dokumentov, ki jih je odbor prejel in preučil.
· thousands of pages of documentation received and analysed by the committee.
Poročevalec sporoča, da bodo vsi izdelani dokumenti (poročila, delovni dokumenti, zapisniki in dobesedni zapisi sej, poročila uradnih delegacij itd.) ter prejeti dokumenti (razen zaupnih) dostopni tudi javnosti.
All the documents produced (reports, working documents, minutes and transcripts of meetings, official delegation reports, etc.) and the documents received (with the exception of confidential documents) will be made public.
Vse opravljeno delo (analiza dejstev, zbrana pričevanja in prejeti dokumenti) je zajeto v devetih delovnih dokumentih , katerih namen je dokazati, poglobiti in dopolniti politične zaključke v končni resoluciji.
All the committee's work (the facts analysed, the evidence given and the documents received) is covered in nine working documents , the purpose of which is to elucidate and flesh out the political conclusions set out in the final resolution.
Poročevalec bi se rad zadržal pri tistih delovnih dokumentih, ki so bili kronološko predstavljeni kot zadnji:
The rapporteur feels it would useful to go briefly over the three working documents that were produced last, namely:
o Delovni dokument št. 7
o Working document No 7
o Delovni dokument št. 8
o Working document No 8
Delovni dokument št. 8 PE 380984. vsebuje analitično študijo navideznih podjetij in letal, ki jih je Cia uporabila za 1245 poletov, kolikor jih je našemu odboru uspelo podrobno rekonstruirati: tip uporabljenih letal, letališče odhoda in prihoda, vozni red, vmesni postanki in zlasti tako imenovane sumljive lokacije , se pravi kraji, od koder so osumljenci prihajali ali kraji izvora, v katerih po ugotovitvah začasnega odbora obstajajo centri za pridržanje, kjer je uporaba mučenja običajno ravnanje.
PE 380984. , which contains an analysis of the shell companies and aircraft used by the CIA for the 1 245 flights which our committee was able to reconstruct in minute detail, from the types of aircraft used to the airports of departure and arrival, flight times, stopovers and, in particular, the 'suspicious locations', i.e. the places of departure or origin in which the temporary commission was able to establish the existence of detention centres at which the use of torture was common practice.
o Delovni dokument št. 9
o Working document No 9
Delovni dokument št. 9 PE 382.420 pa obsega analizo in povzetek podatkov, ki jih je zbral naš odbor o primerih izrednih izročitev , domnevnih centrih za nezakonito pridržanje in vlogi nacionalnih oblasti po posameznih državah.
PE 382.420 , which contains a country-by-country overview of the information gathered by our committee on the extraordinary renditions, the alleged secret detention centres and the role of national authorities.
Naj spomnim, da se za strogim naštevanjem dejstev, dokazov in odgovornosti, ki jih vsebuje poročilo, skrivajo predvsem zgodbe posameznih ljudi, ki so bili v veliko primerih (in šele po več letih zapora) spoznani za popolnoma nedolžne glede obtožb, izrečenih proti njim.
It should be emphasised that, behind the rigorous exposition of incidents, facts and responsibilities in the report lie the stories of individual human beings, many of whom have – following years of detention – been recognised as being totally innocent of the charges brought against them.
Gre za ljudi, ki so jim bile odvzete najbolj temeljne pravice in so pogosto morali prenašati nedostojno in ponižujoče ravnanje.
These are men deprived of their most basic rights and in many cases forced to undergo degrading and humiliating treatment.
Ne smemo pozabiti, da smo se evropski državljani in rezidenti lahko zavzeli za te žrtve izrednih izročitev šele takrat, ko so njihove zgodbe prišle v javnost.
It should be remembered that we were only able to address the plight of these victims of extraordinary renditions because their cases had become public knowledge.
Bojimo se, da so bili še mnogi drugi deležni enake usode, a se zgodovina (ali ta odbor) ni mogla zavzeti zanje.
It is to be feared that many others may have suffered the same fate but escaped the notice of history (and this committee).
Na koncu poročevalec prilaga tri dokumente kot dopolnilo k tej obrazložitvi in k političnim zaključkom, ki jih vsebujeta poročili.
Finally, as further reading to this explanatory statement and the political conclusions set out in the two reports, the rapporteur has attached the following documents:
Povzetek vseh dejavnosti začasnega odbora TDIP (priloga 1).
An overview of all the activities of the TDIP temporary committee (Annex 1).
Seznam vseh oseb, ki so pričale pred odborom ali v okviru uradne delegacije (priloga 2).
A list of all the persons who gave evidence before the committee or during an official delegation mission (Annex 2).
Dokument, ki podrobno opisuje sodelovanje posameznih evropskih držav z našim odborom (priloga 3).
A document providing details on cooperation afforded to our committee by individual European countries (Annex 3).
Seznam vseh oseb, ki so odklonile povabilo na sestanek z začasnim odborom TDIP (priloga 4).
A list of all those who declined an invitation to meet the committee (Annex 4).
Na koncu je poročevalec dolžen spomniti, da so to končno poročilo ter vsi dokumenti in analize, ki jih je izdelal, sad zahtevnega kolektivnega dela, pri katerem so sodelovali številni poslanski kolegi (vseh političnih strank).
To wind up, the rapporteur considers it his duty to point out that his final report and all the documents and analyses he has produced are the fruit of collective effort involving a large number of Members from all political groups, in what were difficult circumstances.
Zlasti se mu zdi potrebno omeniti uradnike iz sekretariata odbora in najožje sodelavce poročevalca, pa tudi vse ostale uradnike iz generalnega sekretariata Evropskega parlamenta in ostalih političnih skupin, ki so bili v preteklih mesecih vključeni v težavno delo.
A special mention should go to the members of the committee secretariat and the staff working directly for the rapporteur, as well as to all other EP secretariat and political group staff involved in the arduous work performed over the past year.
Vsakemu izmed njih se iskreno zahvaljujemo.
Our thanks go to each and every one of them.
Resolution on presumed use of European countries by the Cia for the Transportation and Illegal Detention of Prisoners -TDIP-( P6_TA-PROV(2005)0529
Resolution on presumed use of European countries by the CIA for the Transportation and Illegal Detention of Prisoners -TDIP-( P6_TA-PROV(2005)0529
Former Cia Director
Former CIA Director
After requests of the TDIP Chairman and of TDIP Member Ana Maria Gomes, Government provided a copy of Portugal's reply to Council of Europe (07.07.2006) and vast but not complete explanations and information about Cia flights (18.09.2006, 13.10.2006, 12.12.2006, 12.01.2007 and 16.01.2007).
After requests of the TDIP Chairman and of TDIP Member Ana Maria Gomes, Government provided a copy of Portugal's reply to Council of Europe (07.07.2006) and vast but not complete explanations and information about CIA flights (18.09.2006, 13.10.2006, 12.12.2006, 12.01.2007 and 16.01.2007).
· Confidential report of Romanian Border Police on accident of a Cia plane was provided to the TDIP delegation by Government.
· Confidential report of Romanian Border Police on accident of a CIA plane was provided to the TDIP delegation by Government.
Tyler DRUMHELLER, former Cia agent
Tyler DRUMHELLER, former CIA agent
Michael SCHEUER, former Cia agent
Michael SCHEUER, former CIA agent
BAER Bob, former Cia agent
BAER Bob, former CIA agent
Richard CLARKE, former Cia agent
Richard CLARKE, former CIA agent
Domnevna uporaba evropskih držav za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje ujetnikov s strani ameriške obveščevalne agencije Cia
The alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi infrastrukture za prostorske informacije v Evropski skupnosti (INSPIRE), ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3685/2006 – C6‑0445/2006 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3685/2006 – C6‑0445/2006 ),
19. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0516 )
19. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0516 )
Sprejeta besedila, 2.5.2006, P6_TA(2006)0252 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts Adopted of 2.5.2006, P6_TA(2006)0252 . on the Council common position
UL C 126 E, 30.5.2006, str.
OJ C 126 E, 30.5.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2006)0484 )
Še ni objavljeno v UL. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0484 ),
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6‑0021/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0021/2007 ),
Cilj predlagane direktive, ki temelji na členu 175(1) PES in ki jo je Komisija sprejela julija 2004, je izdelati zakonski okvir za vzpostavitev in delovanje infrastrukture prostorskih podatkov v Evropi, z namenom oblikovanja, izvajanja, spremljanja in vrednotenja politike Skupnosti na vseh ravneh ter zagotavljanja javnih informacij.
The aim of the proposed Directive, based on Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty and adopted by the Commission in July 2004, is to create a legal framework for the establishment and operation of an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe, for the purpose of formulating, implementing, monitoring and evaluating Community policies at all levels and providing public information.
Ključni cilj projekta INSPIRE je dati na voljo več boljših prostorskih podatkov za oblikovanje politik Skupnosti in njihovo izvajanje v državah članicah na vseh ravneh.
A key objective of INSPIRE is to make more and better spatial data available for Community policy-making and implementation of Community policies in the Member States at all levels.
Projekt INSPIRE je usmerjen v okoljsko politiko, vendar je njegova uporaba na voljo tudi drugim sektorjem, v katere bo v prihodnje vključen, kot so kmetijstvo, promet in energija.
INSPIRE focuses on environmental policy but is open for use by and future extension to other sectors such as agriculture, transport and energy.
Evropski parlament je svojo prvo obravnavo zaključil 7. junija 2005, Svet pa je 23. januarja 2006 sprejel skupno stališče.
The Parliament adopted its first reading on 7 June 2005: Council adopted its common position on 23 January 2006.
Na drugi obravnavi 13. junija 2006 je Parlament sprejel 36 predlogov za spremembe skupnega stališča Sveta.
At second reading, on 13 June 2006, the Parliament adopted 36 amendments to the Council's common position.
Sporna vprašanja med Parlamentom in Svetom so bila pravice in stroški intelektualne lastnine, izjeme pri obveznosti zagotavljanja podatkov, vrsta storitev pri zagotavljanju podatkov in dostop do teh storitev, opredelitev meta podatkov in podatkov, področje uporabe direktive in roki za njeno izvajanje.
The issues at stake between Parliament and Council concerned: intellectual property rights and costs; exemptions from obligations to provide data; type of data provision services and access to these; meta-data and data definition; scope of the Directive; deadlines for its implementation.
Svet je kasneje dal neuradno vedeti, da ne bo mogel sprejeti vseh predlogov sprememb Parlamenta in da bo zato potreben spravni postopek.
The Council subsequently indicated informally that it would be unable to accept all of the Parliament's amendments and that consequently a conciliation procedure would be necessary.
Sledili so trije trialogi (26. septembra, 9. oktobra in 8. novembra), po vsakem sestanku pa je pogajalska ekipa delegaciji EP poročala o napredku (27. septembra, 24. oktobra in 14. novembra).
Three trialogues were held (on 26 September, 9 October and 8 November), with the negotiating team reporting back after each meeting to the EP delegation (on 27 September, 24 October and 14 November).
Pri predlogih sprememb, ki so zadevali javne prostorske storitve, načela izvajanja in tehnična vprašanja, je bil dosežen precejšen napredek.
Reasonable progress was made on those groups of amendments which concerned public spatial services, principles of implementation, and technical issues.
Dve sporni vprašanji, višina pristojbin za podatke in pravice intelektualne lastnine, pa sta ostali nerazrešeni.
However, two key points of difference - levels of charges for data and intellectual property rights - remained unresolved.
Spravni odbor se je sestal v večernih urah 21. novembra 2006.
The Conciliation Committee met in the evening of 21 November 2006.
Malo pred polnočjo je odbor dosegel končni sporazum, potem ko je delegacija Evropskega parlamenta soglasno sprejela predlagani sporazumni paket.
Shortly before midnight, the Committee was able to reach a final agreement after the delegation of the European Parliament had accepted unanimously the proposed compromise package.
Ključni točki doseženega sporazuma lahko povzamemo takole:
The two key points of the agreement reached can be summarised as follows:
Višina pristojbin : Na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta bodo morale države članice v splošnem omogočiti brezplačen dostop do storitev iskanja in pregledovanja naborov prostorskih podatkov.
Levels of charges : At Parliament's insistence, Member States will in general have to make available free of charge the services for discovering and viewing spatial data sets.
Nekatere države članice so izrazile zaskrbljenost, da bi to lahko ogrozilo finančno zdravje tistih delov njihovih javnih služb, ki zbirajo geografske podatke, zato je bilo sklenjeno, da bo javnim oblastem dovoljeno zaračunavati stroške po jasno opredeljenih pogojih.
Some Member States were worried that this might threaten the financial viability of those parts of their public services which collect geographical data, and it was agreed that under clearly-defined conditions, public authorities will be allowed to levy charges.
Vseeno pa ta izjema ne bo veljala za podatke, ki so jih javne oblasti dolžne posredovati v okviru izpolnjevanja svojih obveznosti po zakonodaji Skupnosti.
However, this exemption will not apply to data that the public authorities are obliged to provide in order to fulfil their obligations under Community law.
Pravice intelektualne lastnine : Pravice držav članic do omejitve dostopa do informacij na podlagi tajnosti ustrezajo določbam iz Aarhuške konvencije o dostopu do informacij v javni lasti v okoljskih zadevah (Svet si je na začetku prizadeval za pravico do določanja strožjih omejitev dostopa, kot pa so določene v konvenciji).
Intellectual Property Rights : Member States' rights to restrict access to information on grounds of confidentiality will be in line with the provisions set out in the Aarhus Convention on access to publicly-held information about the environment (Council had initially pressed for the right to impose tighter restrictions on access than those provided for in the Convention).
Ta direktiva je pomemben del okoljske zakonodaje.
This Directive is an important piece of environmental legislation.
Sporazum, dosežen v spravnem postopku, obravnava glavna vprašanja, ki izhajajo iz predlogov sprememb iz druge obravnave.
The agreement reached in the course of the conciliation procedure addresses the key issues covered by the second-reading amendments.
Ta sporazum je tudi veliko ustreznejši, kot če bi bil sklenjen na začetku zakonodajnega postopka.
It is also much more satisfactory than any agreement which could have been concluded at an earlier stage of the legislative procedure.
Delegacija v skladu s tem priporoča, da Parlament na tretji obravnavi odobri skupno besedilo.
The delegation accordingly recommends that Parliament approve the joint text at third reading.
Skupno besedilo Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi infrastrukture za prostorske informacije v Evropski skupnosti (INSPIRE), ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor – KOM(2004)0516 – C6-0099/2004
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the Community (INSPIRE) – COM(2004)0516 – C6-0099/2004
Navzoči namestniki (člen 178(2))
Substitute(s) under Rule 178(2) present
o posebnem poročilu Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 6/2005 o vseevropskem prometnem omrežju (TEN-T)
on the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 6/2005 on the Trans-European Network for Transport (TEN-T)
Odbor za proračun
Committee on Budgetary Control
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ................................10
- ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 6/2005 o vseevropskem prometnem omrežju (TEN-T) z odgovori Komisije
- having regard to the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 6/2005 on the Trans-European Network for Transport (TEN-T), together with the Commission's replies
- ob upoštevanju drugega pododstavka člena 248(4), člena 276(3) in člena 280(5) Pogodbe o ES,
- having regard to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, Article 276(3) and Article 280(5) of the EC Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta o tem vprašanju
- having regard to the Committee on Budgetary Control working document on the issue
PE 374.326v02-00. , ki ga je pripravil Odbor za proračunski nadzor,
PE 374.326v02-00. ,
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2006 o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007
- having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2006 on the draft general budget of the EU for the financial year 2007
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0451 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0451 . ,
- ob upoštevanju člena 45 poslovnika,
- having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenja Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0022/2007 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0022/2007 ),
4. poudarja, da bo nov finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 občutno vplival na TEN-T, saj dogovorjeni znesek obsega približno 40 % zneska iz prvotnega predloga Komisije z dne 14. julija 2004 ( KOM(2004)0475 ), v katerem je bilo za TEN-T predlaganih 20.350 milijonov EUR za obdobje od leta 2007 do leta 2013, medtem ko je v novem finančnem okviru zagotovljenih le 8.013 milijonov EUR; meni, da bodo zato postali še pomembnejši izbiranje, prednostno obravnavanje in zagotavljanje učinkovitega izvajanja projektov;
Points out that the new 2007-2013 financial framework will have a considerable impact on the TEN-T, as the amount agreed upon is approximately 40% of that contained in the original Commission proposal of 14 July 2004 ( COM(2004)0475 ), which proposed an amount of EUR 20 350 million for TEN-T for the period 2007 to 2013, whereas the financial framework made only EUR 8 013 million available; believes that, as a consequence, selecting, prioritising and ensuring efficient implementation of the projects will become even more important;
http://ec.europa.eu/ten/transport/coordinators/index_en.htm in se strinja z ugotovitvijo Komisije, da bi nedokončano vseevropsko prometno omrežje kot celota vodilo v izgubo gospodarske konkurenčnosti;
http://ec.europa.eu/ten/transport/coordinators/index_en.htm. , and agrees with the Commission's finding that failure to complete the trans-European transport network as a whole would lead to a loss of economic competitiveness;
17. poziva Komisijo, da nadaljuje svoja prizadevanja za vzpostavitev jasnih zakonskih okvirov in postopkov, da zagotovi strog nadzor in temeljito vrednotenje projektov in programov ter pripravi izčrpen seznam jasnih meril za transparentno razvrščanje projektov po njihovi pomembnosti;
Calls on the Commission to continue its efforts to establish clear legal frameworks and procedures, to guarantee rigorous monitoring and thorough evaluation of projects and programmes, and to draw up a comprehensive list of clear criteria which allow for the prioritisation of projects in a transparent manner;
22. ugotavlja, da je preteklo preveč časa, preden so plačila Komisije dosegla končnega upravičenca; zato poziva, da se denar izplačuje hitro in učinkovito; s tem v zvezi bi lahko bila boljša rešitev neposredno plačilo Komisije upravičencu;
Notes that payments from the Commission have taken excessive time to reach the final beneficiary; calls therefore for money to be paid out swiftly and efficiently; in this context direct payment flow from the Commission to the beneficiary could be a better solution;
24. poudarja, da Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 58/2003 z dne 19. decembra 2002 o statutu izvajalskih agencij, pooblaščenih za izvajanje nekaterih nalog pri upravljanju programov Skupnosti
Points out that Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes
1. , v svojem členu 3(1) predvideva analizo stroškov in koristi ob upoštevanju številnih dejavnikov, ki jo je treba opraviti, preden se lahko zahteva vzpostavitev izvajalske agencije; obžaluje, da Komisija Računskemu sodišču na začetku ni mogla predstaviti zadovoljive analize stroškov in koristi vzpostavitve izvajalske agencije; dvomi, ravno tako kot Evropsko računsko sodišče, o kakovosti revidirane različice analize stroškov in koristi v zvezi z eksternalizacijo upravljanja finančne pomoči Skupnosti za omrežja TEN-T; poziva, da Komisija skuša v prihodnje od Računskega sodišča pridobiti pozitivno mnenje o analizah stroškov in koristi, preden zahtevo za vzpostavitev izvajalske agencije posreduje proračunskim organom;
1. requires, in its Article 3(1) a cost-benefit analysis, taking into account a number of factors, before the establishment of an executive agency can be requested; regrets that the Commission was not in a position to present the European Court of Auditors with a satisfactory cost-benefit analysis of the establishment of an executive agency at the outset; remains, together with the European Court of Auditors, doubtful with regard to the quality of the revised version of the cost-benefit analysis concerning the externalisation of the management of Community financial support to the TEN-T networks; for the future, calls on the Commission to seek a positive opinion on cost-benefit analyses from the European Court of Auditors before forwarding a request for the establishment of an executive agency to the budgetary authorities;