natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Časovna obdobja, ki so dovoljena za privolitev ali zavrnitev privolitve, je treba šteti od datuma potrditve prejema in zato prilagoditi.
Periods of time allowed for granting consent or refusal should be counted from the date of the acknowledgement of receipt and adapted consequently.
Izvajanje Direktive 92/3/Euratom kaže, da se bistvene analize o uporabi za pridobitev dovoljenja za pošiljko lahko izvedejo v dveh mesecih in dodatno v še enem mesecu, če je potrebno.
The implementation of Directive 92/3/Euratom demonstrates that the substantive analysis of the application for shipment authorisation can be conducted within two months plus one extra month, if necessary.
Razen tega kombinacija dveh stopenj postopka povzroča podaljšanje rokov za vsaj 15 koledarskih dni.
Moreover the combination of the two procedural steps leads to increase time limits by at least 15 calendar days.
Obdobja trajanja se štejejo od datuma potrditve prejema, pogoji iz člena 6(2) pa niso več pomembni.
The duration periods being counted from the date of the acknowledgement of receipt, the conditions in Article 6 § 2 is not relevant anymore.
Kadar pristojni organi namembne države članice in/ali predvidene tranzitne države članice po izteku rokov iz drugega in tretjega pododstavka odstavka 1 ne pošljejo odgovora, se šteje, da so navedene države dale soglasje za zahtevano pošiljko , pod pogojem, da je bilo njihovo potrdilo o prejemu vloge iz odstavka 1 prejeto.
If upon expiry of the periods referred to in the second and third subparagraphs of paragraph 1 no reply has been received from the competent authorities of the Member State of destination and/or the intended Member States of transit, those countries shall be deemed to have given their consent for the shipment requested provided that the acknowledgement of receipt referred to in paragraph 1 has been received from those countries.
Kadar pristojni organi namembne države članice in/ali predvidene tranzitne države članice po izteku rokov iz prvega ali drugega pododstavka odstavka 1 ne pošljejo odgovora, se šteje, da so navedene države dale soglasje za zahtevano pošiljko.
If upon expiry of the periods referred to in the first or second subparagraph of paragraph 1 no reply has been received from the competent authorities of the Member State of destination and/or the intended Member States of transit, those countries shall be deemed to have given their consent for the shipment requested.
Člen 6, odstavek 3, točka (b)
Article 6, paragraph 3, point (b)
b) v primeru namembnih držav članic temeljijo na ustrezni zakonodaji, ki se uporablja za ravnanje z radioaktivnimi odpadki ali izrabljenim gorivom, in na ustrezni nacionalni, mednarodni zakonodaji ali zakonodaji Skupnosti, ki se uporablja za prevoz radioaktivnega materiala.
b) for the Member State of destination, on relevant legislation applicable to the management of radioactive waste or spent fuel and on relevant national, Community or international legislation applicable to transport of radioactive material.
b) v primeru namembnih držav članic temeljijo na ustrezni zakonodaji, ki se uporablja za ravnanje z radioaktivnimi odpadki ali izrabljenim gorivom, ali na ustrezni nacionalni, mednarodni zakonodaji ali zakonodaji Skupnosti, ki se uporablja za prevoz radioaktivnega materiala.
b) for the Member State of destination, on relevant legislation applicable to the management of radioactive waste or spent fuel or on relevant national, Community or international legislation applicable to transport of radioactive material.
Besedo "in" je treba nadomestiti z besedo "ali", da so lahko skladne volje različnih zakonodajalcev.
The word "and" needs to be replaced by the word "or" in order to make the will of the different legislators compatible.
Člen 6, odstavek 3, pododstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 6, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 a (new)
Enak postopek privolitve in zavrnitve se uporablja za pošiljke radioaktivnih odpadkov in pošiljke izrabljenega goriva za odlaganje.
The same consent and refusal procedure is to be applied for both shipments of radioactive waste and shipments of spent fuel for disposal.
To je potrebno, da se obrazloži, da obstaja skupni nadzorni postopek, ki se uporablja za vse pošiljke, ne glede na to, če gre za radioaktivne odpadke ali izrabljeno gorivo in ali so poslane za odlaganje ali za predelavo ter vračilo.
This is to clarify that there is a common control procedure which applies to all shipments, whether they are for radioactive waste or spent fuel and whether they are being sent for disposal or for treatment and return.
Kadar pošiljanje ne more biti dokončno opravljeno ali če pogoji za pošiljko niso izpolnjeni v skladu z določbami te direktive, pristojni organi države članice izvora zagotovijo, da zadevne radioaktivne odpadke ali izrabljeno gorivo njihov imetnik vzame nazaj, razen če je mogoče urediti varen nadomesten dogovor.
Where a shipment cannot be completed or if the conditions for shipment are not complied with in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, the competent authorities of the Member State of origin shall ensure that the radioactive waste or the spent fuel in question is taken back by the holder, unless an alternative safe arrangement can be made.
Prav tako zagotovijo, da oseba, odgovorna za pošiljko, po potrebi sprejme ustrezne ukrepe za izboljšanje varnosti.
They shall ensure that the person responsible for the shipment takes corrective safety measures where necessary.
Kadar pošiljanje ne more biti dokončno opravljeno ali če pogoji za pošiljko niso izpolnjeni v skladu z določbami te direktive, pristojni organi države članice izvora zagotovijo, da zadevne radioaktivne odpadke ali izrabljeno gorivo njihov imetnik vzame nazaj, razen če je mogoče urediti varen nadomesten dogovor na podlagi veljavne zakonodaje o ravnanju z izrabljenim gorivom in radioaktivnimi odpadki.
Where a shipment cannot be completed or if the conditions for shipment are not complied with in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, the competent authorities of the Member State of origin shall ensure that the radioactive waste or the spent fuel in question is taken back by the holder, unless an alternative safe arrangement can be made on the basis of the applicable legislation on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste .
Besedna zveza „razen če je mogoče urediti varen nadomesten dogovor“ je nejasna.
The wording 'unless an alternative safe arrangement can be made' is vague.
Izrecno se je treba sklicevati na varen nadomesten dogovor, kot določa zakonodaja o ravnanju z izrabljenim gorivom in radioaktivnimi odpadki, zlasti Skupna konvencija IAEA o varnosti ravnanja z izrabljenim gorivom in o varnosti ravnanja z radioaktivnimi odpadki, h kateri je Skupnost pristopila 2. januarja 2006.
There should be express reference to an alternative safe arranagement as provided by the legislation on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, in particular the IAEA Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, to which the Community acceded on 2 January 2006.
Stroške, ki nastanejo, kadar pošiljanja ni mogoče ali ni dovoljeno dokončno opraviti , krije imetnik.
The holder shall be liable for costs arising in cases where the shipment cannot or may not be completed.
Kadar pošiljanja ni mogoče ali ni dovoljeno dokončno opraviti zaradi razlogov iz odstavka 1 , stroške, ki nastanejo, krije imetnik, razen če je v kateri koli ustrezni veljavni zakonodaji ali pogodbenem dogovoru med imetnikom in katero koli drugo osebo, ki jo pošiljka zadeva, določeno drugače.
Where the shipment cannot or may not be completed for the reasons referred to in paragraph 1, the holder shall be primarily liable for costs arising, unless otherwise provided either in any relevant applicable legislation or in any contractual arrangement made between the holder and any other person involved in the shipment.
Direktiva upošteva dejstvo, da se v praksi vprašanje stroškov zaradi neuspele pošiljke lahko obravnava tudi v pogodbenih dogovorih med strankami in/ali v zadevni veljavni zakonodaji.
The Directive shall take into account the fact that in practice the issue of costs resulting from shipment failure can also be addressed in contractual arrangements between parties and/or in relevant applicable legislation.
Stroške, ki nastanejo, kadar pošiljanja ni mogoče ali ni dovoljeno dokončno opraviti, krije prejemnik.
The consignee shall be liable for costs arising in cases where the shipment cannot or may not be completed.
Vprašanje stroškov zaradi neuspele pošiljke je v členu 10 obravnavano dvakrat (v odstavkih 1 in 5).
The issue of costs resulting from shipment failures is dealt with twice in Article 10 (in paragraph 1 and in paragraph 5).
Za izboljšanje obravnave je treba to vprašanje obravnavati le v enem odstavku, za kar je najprimernejši člen 10(5).
To improve reading, this issue shall be dealt with under only one paragraph, Article 10 § 5 being the most appropriate.
Namembna država članica ali morebitna tranzitna država članica lahko odloči, da pošiljanje ne more biti dokončno opravljeno, če pogoji za pošiljanje niso več izpolnjeni v skladu z določbami te direktive ali če niso skladni z dovoljenji ali privolitvami, izdanimi po tej direktivi.
The Member State of destination or any Member State of transit may decide that the shipment may not be completed if the conditions for shipment are no longer complied with in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, or are not in accordance with the authorisations or consents issued pursuant to this Directive.
Ta država članica o svoji odločitvi nemudoma obvesti pristojne organe države izvora.
Such Member State shall forthwith inform the competent authorities of the country of origin of this decision.
Stroške, ki nastanejo, kadar pošiljanja ni mogoče ali ni dovoljeno dokončno opraviti, bo kril prejemnik.
The consignee will be liable for costs arising in cases where the shipment cannot or may not be completed
Kadar pošiljanja ni mogoče ali ni dovoljeno dokončno opraviti zaradi razlogov iz odstavka 1, stroške, ki nastanejo, krije prejemnik, razen če je v kateri koli ustrezni veljavni zakonodaji ali pogodbenem dogovoru med prejemnikom in katero koli drugo osebo, ki jo pošiljka zadeva, določeno drugače.
Where the shipment cannot or may not be completed for the reasons referred to in the first paragraph, the consignee shall be primarily liable for costs arising , unless otherwise provided either in any relevant applicable legislation or in any contractual arrangement made between the consignee and any other person involved in the shipment.
Tranzitna država članica lahko odloči, da pošiljka ne more biti dokončno opravljena, če pogoji za pošiljko niso več izpolnjeni v skladu določbami te direktive ali če niso skladni z dovoljenji ali privolitvami, izdanimi po tej direktivi.
A Member State of transit may decide that the shipment may not be completed if the conditions for shipment are no longer complied with in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, or are not in accordance with the authorisations or consents issued pursuant to this Directive.
Stroške, ki nastanejo, kadar pošiljke ni mogoče ali ni dovoljeno dokončno opraviti , krije odgovorna oseba iz odstavka 1.
The responsible person referred to in paragraph 1 shall be liable for costs arising in cases where the shipment cannot or may not be completed.
Kadar pošiljanja ni mogoče ali ni dovoljeno dokončno opraviti zaradi razlogov iz pododstavka 1, stroške, ki nastanejo, krije odgovorna oseba iz odstavka 1, razen če je v kateri koli ustrezni veljavni zakonodaji ali pogodbenem dogovoru med to osebo in katero koli drugo osebo, ki jo pošiljka zadeva, določeno drugače.
Where the shipment cannot or may not be completed for the reasons referred to in the first subparagraph, the responsible person referred to in paragraph 1 shall be primarily liable for costs arising, unless otherwise provided either in any relevant applicable legislation or in any contractual arrangement made between that person and any other person involved in the shipment.
Država članica izvora ali morebitna tranzitna država članica lahko odloči, da pošiljka ne more biti dokončno opravljena, če pogoji za pošiljko niso več izpolnjeni v skladu z določbami te direktive ali če niso skladni z dovoljenji ali privolitvami, izdanimi po tej direktivi.
The Member State of origin or any Member State of transit may decide that the shipment may not be completed if the conditions for shipment are no longer complied with in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, or are not in accordance with the authorisations or consents issued pursuant to this Directive.
Ta tranzitna država članica o svoji odločitvi nemudoma obvesti pristojne organe države članice izvora.
Such Member State of transit shall forthwith inform the competent authorities of the Member State of origin of this decision.
Uporablja se člen 9(2).
Article 9, paragraph 2, applies.
Stroške, ki nastanejo, kadar pošiljke ni mogoče ali ni dovoljeno dokončno opraviti, bo kril imetnik.
T he holder will be liable for costs arising in cases where the shipment cannot or may not be completed.
Če pošiljanja ni mogoče ali ni dovoljeno dokončno opraviti v okoliščinah iz pododstavka 1, stroške, ki nastanejo, krije imetnik, razen če je v kateri koli ustrezni veljavni zakonodaji ali pogodbenem dogovoru med imetnikom in katero koli drugo osebo, ki jo pošiljka zadeva, določeno drugače.
In case the shipment cannot or may not be completed in the circumstances referred to in the first subparagraph, t he holder shall be primarily liable for costs arising, unless otherwise provided either in any relevant applicable legislation or in any contractual arrangement made between the holder and any other person involved in the shipment.
Države članice spodbujajo dogovore, ki omogočajo varno ravnanje, vključno s končnim odlaganjem, z radioaktivnimi odpadki iz držav, ki jih proizvajajo v majhnih količinah in v katerih ustanovitev ustreznih objektov ne bi bila upravičena iz radiološkega stališča.
Member States shall promote agreements in order to facilitate the safe management, including the final disposal, of radioactive waste from countries that produce it in small quantities and where the establishment of appropriate facilities would not be justified from the radiological point of view.
Države članice spodbujajo dogovore, ki omogočajo varno ravnanje, vključno s končnim odlaganjem, z radioaktivnimi odpadki iz držav, ki jih proizvajajo v majhnih količinah in v katerih ustanovitev ustreznih objektov ne bi bila upravičena iz radiološkega, gospodarskega, okoljskega in varnostnega stališča.
Member States shall promote agreements in order to facilitate the safe management, including the final disposal, of radioactive waste from countries that produce it in small quantities and where the establishment of appropriate facilities would not be justified from the radiological , economic, environmental, and safety point of view.
Takšni dogovori se sklenejo pod pogojem, da vsaka država članica ohrani pravico do zavrnitve vstopa izrabljenega goriva in radioaktivnih odpadkov za končno predelavo ali odlaganje na svoje ozemlje, razen v primeru vračanja pošiljk.
Such agreements shall be concluded with the proviso that each Member State retains the right to refuse entry on to its territory of spent fuel and radioactive waste for final processing or disposal, with the exception of reshipments.
Dogovor v skladu z zgornjim besedilom bi omogočil doseganje nujne ekonomije obsega in obravnavanje dovolj velike količine radioaktivnih odpadkov za nadomestilo potrebnih stroškov, da bi vzpostavili skupne objekte za odlaganje, ki zagotavljajo popolno skladnost z najvišjimi okoljskimi in varnostnimi standardi.
An arrangement along the above lines would make it possible to achieve the necessary economies of scale and treat a large enough volume of radioactive waste to recoup the outlay needed in order to set up joint disposal facilities ensuring full compliance with the highest environmental and safety standards.
Postopek sodelovanja prek prostovoljnih dogovorov med državami članicami in, po potrebi, prek arbitraže Komisije je primeren, ker izpolnjuje potrebe malih proizvajalcev jedrskih odpadkov.
The process of cooperation through voluntary agreements between Member States and, where necessary, through Commission arbitration is expedient because it meets the needs of small producers of nuclear waste.
Vseeno mora biti v vsakem primeru izrecno določeno, da vsaka država članica vedno ohrani pravico do zavrnitve vstopa izrabljenega jedrskega goriva in radioaktivnih odpadkov za končno predelavo ali odlaganje na svoje ozemlje.
Nevertheless, in each case, there must be an express proviso that each Member State retains the right at all times to refuse entry on to its territory of both spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste for final processing or disposal.
Direktiva 92/3/Euratom o nadzorovanju in kontroli pošiljk radioaktivnih odpadkov med državami članicami ter v Skupnost in iz nje je bila usmerjena v vzpostavitev sistema Skupnosti za strogo kontrolo in predhodno odobritev pošiljk radioaktivnih odpadkov.
Directive 92/3/Euratom on the supervision and control of shipments of radioactive waste between Member States and into and out of the Community was aimed at establishing a system of strict control and prior authorisation for shipments of radioactive waste.
Pravna osnova predloga je Pogodba Euratom ter njena člena 31 in 32 (varnost in zdravje).
The legal base for the proposal is the Euratom Treaty and its Articles 31 and 32 (Health and Safety).
Uporablja se le postopek posvetovanja z Evropskim parlamentom.
Only the consultation procedure with the European Parliament is applied.
Komisija svoj predlog utemeljuje z usklajenostjo z najnovejšimi direktivami Euratom, z usklajenostjo z mednarodnimi konvencijami, zlasti s Skupno konvencijo IAEA o varnosti ravnanja z izrabljenim gorivom in varnosti ravnanja z radioaktivnimi odpadki (katere pogodbenica je Euratom), s pojasnitvijo postopkov in praks ter z razširitvijo področja uporabe na izrabljeno gorivo.
The Commission justifies its proposal by consistency with the latest Euratom directives, by consistency with international conventions, especially the IAEA Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management (which Euratom is a party to), by clarifying the procedures in practice and by extension of the scope to spent fuel.
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti razširjenemu področju uporabe direktive, postopku samodejne privolitve za pošiljke ter ločevanju med pošiljkami v Skupnosti in tistimi zunaj Skupnosti.
Special attention is to be paid to the extended scope of the Directive, the automatic consent procedure for shipments and the separation between intra- and extra-community shipments.
Področje uporabe te direktive se razširi na izrabljeno gorivo, namenjeno ponovni predelavi in odlaganju.
The scope of the Directive is extended to spent fuel for reprocessing and disposal.
Z radiološkega stališča gre za logičen korak.
It is a logical step from the radiological point of view.
Vpeljan je postopek samodejne privolitve in nobena država nima možnosti podobnega postopka zavrnitve, kot je bil predviden v stari direktivi.
The automatic approval procedure is introduced, and no country will have an option to the similar non-acceptance procedure like in the old Directive.
Glede pošiljk radioaktivnih snovi v Skupnosti, ki lahko vključuje tranzit preko tretjih držav, je treba te le obvestiti (člen 7.1), po tem ko je bila pošiljka odobrena.
As to intra-community shipments of radioactive materials which may involve transit through third countries, only informing them is required (Article 7.1) once the shipment has been authorised.
Pojasniti je treba vprašanje izrabljenega goriva za odlaganje.
The question of the spent fuel for disposal needs to be clarified.
Uvod (xii) Skupne konvencije IAEA priznava, da „ima vsaka država pravico prepovedati uvoz tujega izrabljenega goriva in radioaktivnih odpadkov na svoje ozemlje“.
The Preamble (xii) of the IAEA Joint Convention recognises that "any State has the right to ban imports into its territory of foreign spent fuel and radioactive waste".
Člen 27(1.i) te Konvencije pravi, da „pogodbenica, ki je država izvora, sprejme primerne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovi, da je čezmejni promet odobren in da se zgodi le na podlagi predhodnega uradnega obvestila in odobritve namembne države“.
The Article 27(1.i) of the same Convention says that "a Contracting Party which is a State of origin shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that transboundary movement is authorized and takes place only with the prior notification and the consent of the State of destination".
Evropski parlament v svojem poročilu o Direktivi Sveta (Euratom) o „ravnanju z izrabljenim gorivom in radioaktivnimi odpadki“ (PE 322.031 def) pravi, da "nobena država članica nikoli ni obvezana sprejeti uvoza kakršnikoli radioaktivnih odpadkov iz drugih držav članic".
In its report on a Council Directive (Euratom) on "the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste" (PE 322.031 def) the European Parliament says (Recital 12.a) that "no Member State shall ever be obliged to accept imports of any kind of radioactive waste from other member states".
V uvodni izjavi (odstavek 3.6) te direktive je zapisano: „določbe te direktive zato ne bi smele posegati v pravico držav članic, da izvozijo svoje izrabljeno gorivo za ponovno predelavo, ali v njihovo pravico, da zavrnejo vstop radioaktivnih odpadkov, namenjenih končni obdelavi ali odlaganju, na njihovo ozemlje, razen v primeru vračanja pošiljk“.
In the Recital (Paragraph 3.6) of this Directive proposal is said: "The provisions of this Directive should therefore be without prejudice to the right of Member States to export their spent fuel for reprocessing and to their right to refuse the entry into their territory of radioactive waste for final treatment or disposal, except in the case of reshipment."
Dalje v besedilu (člen 6.3.b) je navedeno, da bi morala država članice zavrnitev odobritve utemeljiti na: „v primeru namembnih držav članic temeljijo na ustrezni zakonodaji, ki se uporablja za ravnanje z radioaktivnimi odpadki ali izrabljenim gorivom, ali na ustrezni nacionalni, mednarodni zakonodaji ali zakonodaji Skupnosti, ki se uporablja za prevoz radioaktivnega materiala“.
Further, in the text (Article 6.3.b) the refusal of the Member State to grant a consent should be based: "for the Member State of destination, on relevant legislation applicable to the management of radioactive waste or spent fuel and on relevant national, Community or international legislation applicable to transport of radioactive material".
Zaradi besede "in" v sredini stavka se postavlja vprašanje, če se ne postavlja dvom glede nedvoumne pravice namembne države, da ne izda privolitve za uvoz izrabljenega goriva za končno odlaganje.
The word "and" in the middle of the sentence raises the question, if the unambiguous right of the recipient country not to give its consent for the importation of spent fuel for final disposal is in doubt.
Besedilo v tem pogledu ne odgovarja na vprašanje: ali ima vsaka država pravico prepovedati, da bi bilo tuje izrabljeno gorivo končno shranjeno v odlagališčih v ali na njeni zemlji.
In this respect, the text does not answer to the question: has every country the right to ban foreign nuclear spent fuel to be finally stored into the repositories in or on its soil.
Po zakonodaji Evropskega skupnega trga gre pri radioaktivnih odpadkih in izrabljenem gorivu za blago, ki mora biti medsebojno ločeno.
Radioactive waste and spent fuel are, in the European common market legislation, goods which must be separated from each other.
Treba je razlikovati med tem različnim blagom.
One needs to make a distinction between these different goods.