natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
F. ker se Svet pogaja na podlagi horizontalne delovne skupine za droge in projekta CAT (člen 36 odbora) o vsebini osnutka Strategije EU o boju proti drogam (2005–2012), ne da bi poznal ocene Strategije EU o boju proti drogam (2000–2005) in ocene izvajanja Akcijskega načrta EU (2000–2005), ki jih morata pripraviti EMCD in Komisija ter katerih rezultati bodo najverjetneje predloženi v oktobru ali novembru 2004, in ker bi seje nacionalnih koordinatorjev EU morale nadzorovati, ali je bil v horizontalni delovni skupin dosežen napredek,
F. whereas the Council is negotiating within the Horizontal Drugs Group and the CAT (the committee referred to in Article 36 of the EU Treaty) on the contents of the draft EU Anti-Drug Strategy (2005-2012), without knowing the assessments of either the EU Anti-Drug Strategy (2000-2005) or the implementation of the EU Action Plan on Drugs (2000-2005) which are to be drawn up by the EMCD and the Commission, whose results are expected to be submitted in November 2004, and whereas the meetings of EU national co-ordinators should monitor whether progress is being made at the Horizontal Drugs Group,
G. ker bo Komisija Združenih narodov za droge začela priprave za izredno zasedanje ZN o drogah v letu 2008, deset let po vrhu o drogah leta 1998,
G. whereas the United Nations Commission on Drugs will be launching preparations for the UN special session on drugs in 2008 ten years after the 1998 drug summit,
H. ker je treba nujno razvijati natančne, merljive, operativne cilje, da bi bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali in v kakšni meri so cilji in ukrepi, oblikovani v prejšnji strategiji, dali rezultate,
H. whereas it is necessary to develop precise, quantifiable, operational objectives, in order to be able to ascertain whether and to what extent the goals and measures formulated in the previous strategy have produced results,
I. v prepričanju, da bi moralo biti tveganje, ki ga predstavljajo droge, analizirano s popolnoma znanstvenega stališča, ob podrobnem pregledu objektivnih in primerljivih podatkov in ob izogibanju uporabe ideološkega pristopa kot najboljšega načina za reševanje težav, povezanih z drogami, in v upanju, da bodo te analize in ocene objavljene,
I. believing that to avoid an over-simplistic analysis of the wide range of drug-related problems, the risk represented by drugs should be analysed inter alia from a scientific, sociological and cultural point of view not only minutely examining objective and comparable data but also carefully assessing any other implications and damage to the development of society, and calling for these analyses and assessments to be published,
J. ker mora nacionalna politika o drogah temeljiti na znanstvenih dognanjih v zvezi s posameznimi vrstami drog in ne na čustvenem odzivu, saj zahteva vsaka težava v zvezi z drogami poseben pristop; ker posplošen pristop ovira verodostojnost vseh vidikov politike,
J. whereas national drugs policy must be based on scientific knowledge concerning each type of drug, not on an emotional response, since each drug-related problem calls for a specific approach; whereas a generalised approach undermines the credibility of all aspects of the policy,
K. ker je treba na podlagi teh ocen in analiz nujno začeti tudi revizijo politik o drogah v namen povečanja njihove uspešnosti in učinkovitosti v smislu zastavljenih ciljev, s posebno pozornostjo do alternativnih politik, ki že dajejo boljše rezultate v nekaterih državah članicah, npr. pri zmanjšanju števila smrti zaradi drog in varovanju zdravja ter zagotavljanju socialne in ekonomske reintegracije odvisnikov,
K. whereas it is also vital, on the basis of these assessments and analyses, to begin revising drug policies to make them more effective and efficient in terms of the objectives to be achieved, particular attention being paid to alternative policies which are already producing better results in many Member States, for example, in reducing drug-related deaths and safeguarding the health and ensuring the social and economic reintegration of drug addicts,
Evropskemu svetu in Svetu pri določanju naslednje Evropske strategije o drogah (2005–2012) in ob sklicevanju na politiko EU o drogah priporoča naslednje:
Recommends to the European Council and to the Council, when defining the future European Drugs Strategy (2005-2012), and with general reference to EU policy on drugs, that they should:
(a) izoblikovanje pravega evropskega sodelovanja v politiki o drogah, usmerjenega na reševanje obsežnega čezmejnega prometa z nedovoljenimi drogami, ki je povezano s težavami vseh vidikov in področij, na podlagi znanstvenega pristopa, spoštovanja civilnih in političnih pravic ter zaščite življenj in zdravja posameznikov;
(a) redefine European cooperation on a drugs policy aimed at tackling cross-border and large-scale drug trafficking, which takes into account all the implications of the problem, and is based on a scientific approach, respect for civil and political rights and protection of the lives and health of individuals;
(b) določitev jasnih, natančnih, merljivih ciljev in prednosti, ki jih je mogoče prevesti v operativne kazalnike in ukrepe v prihodnjih akcijskih načrtih, ob jasni vzpostavitvi obveznosti in rokov izvedbe ter ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti.
(b) set clear, precise, quantifiable goals and priorities which can be translated into operational indicators and measures in future Action Plans, very clearly establishing responsibilities and deadlines for implementation, and taking account of the subsidiarity principle.
Za lažjo izvedbo je treba v povezavi s temi jasno določenimi cilji (sodelovanje, obveščanje, ocenjevanje in mednarodno sodelovanje) uporabiti multidisciplinarni pristop na evropski ravni.
In order to facilitate implementation, a multidisciplinary approach should be taken at European level in relation to these clearly defined goals (coordination, information, assessment and international cooperation);
(c) upoštevanje dejstva, da kažejo dosedanje ocene šestih glavnih ciljev, določenih v Strategiji EU o boju proti drogam (2000–2004), da nobeden od njih ni dosegel pozitivnih rezultatov in da se pri oblikovanju Evropske strategije za boj proti drogam za obdobje 2005–2012 in s tem povezanimi akcijskimi načrti črpa iz dosedanjih političnih in zakonodajnih izkušenj;
(c) take account of the fact that the assessments made to date of the six main objectives set by the EU Anti-Drug Strategy (2000-2004) show that none of them achieved favourable results and draw political and legislative lessons from this when devising the European Anti-Drug Strategy 2005-2012 and the related action plans;
(d) upoštevanje ocene dosežkov šestih glavnih ciljev, določenih v Strategiji EU za boj proti drogam;
(d) take into account the assessments of the achievement of the six main objectives set by the EU Anti-Drug Strategy;
(e) osnovanje nove Strategije z bolj znanstvenim pristopom in s poglobljenim, strukturiranim posvetom z vsemi vpletenimi s tega področja v državah članicah;
(e) base the new strategy more on scientific research and in-depth, structured consultation with those involved in this field in the Member States;
(f) oblikovanje nove Strategije EU o drogah na pravni, institucionalni in finančni osnovi, ki izhaja iz učinkovitih preteklih ukrepov, uspešne najboljše prakse;
(f) found the new EU Drugs Strategy on legal, institutional and financial bases which are derived from effective past action and the success of best practices;
(g) povečanje socialnih in znanstvenih raziskav o nedovoljenih substancah za določene zdravstvene in socialne namene;
(g) increase social and scientific research on illegal substances for relevant medical and social purposes;
(h) predložitev alternative za sedanjo finančno razdrobitev z oblikovanjem nove proračunske postavke, kar je tesno povezano z ukrepi, ki bodo morali biti zagotovljeni za nadaljnje akcijske načrte, ki jih bo sprejela Komisija, saj v nasprotnem primeru ne bo mogoče doseči ciljev, določenih v Strategiji o drogah;
(h) produce an alternative to the current financial fragmentation by creating a new budget line, closely meshed with all the measures which will need to be provided for in future Action Plans to be adopted by the Commission, since otherwise it will not be possible to achieve the objectives laid down in the Drugs Strategy;
(i) vpeljati posebno proračunsko postavko, da bi tako olajšali proces posvetovanja z zadevnimi organizacijama civilne družbe in neodvisnimi strokovnjaki glede vpliva politike na področju drog na ravni državljanov;
(i) c reate a specific budget line in order to facilitate an ongoing process of consultation with affected civil society organisations and independent professional experts about the impact of drug policies at the level of citizens;
(j) izvedba podrobnega ocenjevanja o učinkovitosti izvajanja prej omenjene Strategije, še zlasti v zvezi s:
( j) carry out a detailed evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of the previous strategy, with particular regard to:
· preprečevanjem rabe in odvisnosti,
· prevention of use and dependence,
· zmanjševanjem ponudbe in povpraševanja po prepovedanih drogah,
· a reduction in the supply of and the demand for illicit drugs,
· omejevanjem socialne škode (marginalizacije),
· the limitation of social damage (marginalisation),
· omejevanjem škode za zdravje,
· the limitation of health damage,
· zmanjševanjem z drogami povezanih prekrškov in organiziranega kriminala
· reduction in drug-related petty crime and organised crime
nesprejemanje nove Evropske strategije o drogah (2005–2012) brez poznavanja resničnih rezultatov, doseženih s prejšnjo Strategijo, ki so bili ocenjeni z ustreznimi tehničnimi, znanstvenimi, zakonodajnimi in političnimi ocenami;
and therefore not to adopt the new European Drugs Strategy (2005-2012) without knowing the real results achieved by the previous Strategy, as measured by the relevant technical, scientific, legislative and political assessments;
(k) redno obveščanje Evropskega parlamenta v skladu z načeli demokratične legitimnosti, preglednosti in lojalnega sodelovanja med ustanovami o napredku pogajanj v Svetu v zvezi z Evropsko strategijo o boju proti drogam (2005–2012);
(k) inform the European Parliament periodically in accordance with the principles of democratic legitimacy, transparency and cooperation between the institutions, of the progress of the negotiations within the Council on the European Strategy on Fighting Drugs (2005-2012);
(l) pravočasno posvetovanje z EP pred sprejemom Evropske strategije o drogah (2005–2012), ki bo omogočilo upoštevanje mnenja Parlamenta;
(l) consult the EP in good time before adopting the European Drugs Strategy (2005-2012), so that Parliament’s opinion can be taken into account;
(m) predložitev ukrepov, ki so popolnoma drugačni od zdaj izbranih, za doseganje skupnega cilja Strategije EU o drogah, pri čemer ima prednost zaščita življenj in zdravja uporabnikov prepovedanih substanc, v zvezi z izboljšanjem njihovega dobrega počutja in zaščite s pomočjo uravnoteženega in integriranega pristopa k težavi, saj so zadevni predlogi popolnoma nezadostni;
(m) propose measures totally different from those currently selected to achieve the overall EU Drugs Strategy objective, giving priority to protecting the lives and health of users of illicit substances, improving their wellbeing and protection by means of a balanced and integrated approach to the problem, since the relevant proposals are inadequate;
(n) pospeševanje evropskih mehanizmov za sodelovanje, saj so meje EU-25 bližje državam, iz katerih izvirajo droge, da bi obvladali promet z drogami, ki se širi v Unijo;jasna opredelitev in razširitev novega evropskega mehanizma za sodelovanje na področju politike o drogah, med drugim s pomočjo Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in odvisnosti, s čimer bi dosegli integriran, multidisciplinaren in uravnotežen pristop do težav z drogami, kar je zdaj, po pristopu desetih novih držav članic, še bolj nujno kot kdaj koli prej;
(n) step up European cooperation mechanisms as EU 25's borders are closer to the countries in which drugs originate, so as to curb the drug traffic entering the Union and clearly define and extend the new European coordination mechanism on drugs policy, inter alia through the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, so as to achieve an integrated, multidisciplinary and balanced approach to the problem of drugs, which is now more necessary than ever following the accession of ten new Member States;
(o) izoblikovanje minimalnih standardov za izboljšanje učinkovitosti ukrepov posredovanja in rehabilitacije na osnovi najboljših praks v državah članicah v namen zmanjševanja vpliva uporabe drog na družbo;
(o) establish minimum standards to improve the effectiveness of intervention and rehabilitation measures based on best practice in the Member States, with the goal of reducing the impact of drug use on society;
(p) primerno upoštevanje novih razmer, ki so nastale po pristopu desetih držav članic v Unijo, kar zahteva intenzivnejše sodelovanje z novimi obmejnimi državami;
(p) take adequate account of the new situation that has arisen following the accession of ten new Member States to the Union, which necessitates more intensive cooperation with the new border states;
(q) povečanje dostopnosti do programov za zmanjševanje škode (še posebej za preprečevanje širjenja virusa HIV in drugih bolezni, ki se prenašajo s krvjo) za uporabnike drog;
(q) increase the availability of harm-reduction programmes (especially to prevent the spread of HIV and other blood-borne diseases) among drug users;
(s) večji poudarek na obveščanju, preprečevanju, skrbi in pozornosti, ki jih je treba nameniti življenju in zdravju oseb, ki imajo težave zaradi uporabe prepovedanih substanc in ki se pogosto znajdejo v položaju na obrobju družbe in socialne izključenosti, kot na neuspešni represivni strategiji, ki je pogosto povzročila kršenje osnovnih človekovih pravic;
(s) lay much greater stress on harm reduction, information, prevention, care and attention to protecting the lives and health of people with problems caused by the use of illicit substances, and define measures to prevent them from being marginalised rather than implementing repressive strategies which verge on and had frequently led to violations of human rights;
(t) vzpostavitev rehabilitacijskih programov za prestopnike/uporabnike kot alternativo zaporu, ker so se taki programi izkazali za učinkovite v državah, v katerih se izvajajo;
(t) set up rehabilitation programmes for offenders/users as alternatives to prison, since such programmes have been found to be effective in countries which have implemented them;
(u) poudarja krepitev ustreznega financiranja zahtevanih informacijskih ukrepov za preprečevanje uporabe drog, zlasti v šolah, kot je določeno v Akcijskem načrtu 2000–2004, ter obvladovanje negativnih posledic uporabe drog;
(u) step up and provide appropriate funding for the information measures required to provide information on illicit substances and prevent drug use, particularly in schools, as provided for in the 2000-2004 action plan, and curb the negative repercussions of drug use and the associated risks;
(v) poudarjanje krepitve informacijskih ukrepov, ki naj temeljijo na znanstvenih spoznanjih, povezanih s posledicami različnih vrst drog (predvsem sintetičnih drog), tako da lahko jasno in odločno posvarimo vsakega;
(v) place emphasis on stepping up information measures, which should be based on scientific knowledge, regarding the consequences of various types of drugs (above all synthetic drugs), so as to be able to warn everyone in clear, strong terms;
(w) opredelitev in neprestana krepitev vključevanja in sodelovanja odvisnikov in uporabnikov prepovedanih substanc, civilne družbe in splošne javnosti pri iskanju rešitev za te težave, zlasti s tesnejšim vključevanjem organizacij, ki delujejo na tem področju v okviru horizontalne delovne skupine o drogah, ter z organizacijo evropske letne preventivne pobude, z ustanavljanjem, na eksperimentalni osnovi, enostavno dostopnih informacijskih centrov, ki se ukvarjajo s protiprohibicijsko strategijo zmanjševanja škode.
(w) define and exponentially step up the involvement and participation of drug addicts and users of illicit substances, civil society, NGOs, the voluntary sector and the general public in resolving drug-related problems, in particular by involving organisations operating in this area more closely in the work of the Horizontal Drugs Group and by organising an annual European prevention initiative and by setting up, on an experimental basis, easily accessible informal centres pursuing an anti-prohibitionist harm-reduction strategy;
(x) vpeljati posebno proračunsko postavko, da bi tako olajšali proces posvetovanja z zadevnimi organizacijama civilne družbe in neodvisnimi strokovnjaki glede vpliva politike na področju drog na ravni državljanov;
(x) create a specific budget line in order to facilitate an ongoing process of consultation with relevant civil-society organisations and independent professional experts about the impact of drug policies at the level of citizens;
(y) izoblikovanje ukrepov ocenjevanja, ki bodo omogočili, da bodo odstopanja – in ustreznejši ukrepi in sredstva – od ciljev, določenih v Strategiji EU o drogah, ustrezno zaznana in pravočasno popravljena;
(y) establish assessment measures which will allow shortcomings in - and more appropriate measures and resources to achieve - the goals set out in the EU Drugs Strategy to be detected correctly and rectified;
(z) izvajanje ustreznih ukrepov za preprečevanje prometa s prepovedanimi drogami, s katerim se financira mednarodni terorizem, in izvajanje veljavne zakonodaje o zaplembi blaga in boju proti pranju denarja;
(z) take appropriate steps to prevent the profits from illegal drug trafficking from being used to fund international terrorism and apply current legislation on confiscating goods and fighting money-laundering;
(aa) vključevanje posebnih klavzul o sodelovanju na področju boja proti drogam v vse mednarodne sporazume, zlasti v nove sporazume o sodelovanju s tretjimi državami;
(aa) include in all international agreements, and particularly new cooperation agreements with third countries, a specific anti-drug cooperation clause, with ‘essential clause’ status;
(ab) močno povečanje razvojne pomoči, namenjene državam, ki proizvajajo droge, s pomočjo trajnih programov alternativnih pridelkov in s korenitim zmanjšanjem revščine ter upoštevanje možnosti izvajanja pilotnih projektov za industrijsko proizvodnjo zakonitih izdelkov, proizvedenih iz rastlin, listov koke in indijske konoplje, kot je določeno v Konvenciji iz leta 1961;
(ab) significantly increase development aid to drug-producing countries, by means of programmes to fund sustainable alternative crops and the radical reduction of poverty, exploring also the possibility of promoting and safeguarding production for medical and scientific purposes, of opiates for example, and to take into consideration the possibility of launching pilot projects for the industrial manufacture of legal products derived from plants covered by the 1961 Convention, such as coca leaf and Indian hemp;
(ac) omogočanje in zagotavljanje dostopa do nadomestnih programov, zlasti s poudarkom na zaporniškem okolju, s spodbujanjem alternativ zaporni kazni za uporabnike nezakonitih substanc ali s tem povezanih manjših in nenasilnih kaznivih dejanj;
(ac) provide and ensure access to substitution programmes, with particular reference to the prison environment, while encouraging alternatives to imprisonment for users of illicit substances or for related minor and non-violent offences;
(ad) širjenje obsega raziskovanja na področju uporabe rastlin, ki so zdaj prepovedane ali pa so v sivem območju, kot so npr. konoplja, opij ali listi koke, za uporabo v medicini, pri varstvu hrane, trajnostnem kmetijstvu, ustvarjanju alternativnih goriv, nadomeščanju izdelkov, ki temeljijo na oljni bazi ali osnovi na lesa ter za druge koristne namene;
(ad) increase research into the use of plants that are currently illegal or in a grey zone, like hemp, opium or coca leaves, for medicinal applications, food security, sustainable agriculture, generation of alternative energy sources, substitution for tree- or oil-based products and other beneficial purposes;
(ae) pregled okvirne odločbe o prometu s prepovedanimi drogami ob upoštevanju mnenj, ki jih je izrazil Parlament, ter z obveznim upoštevanjem načel subsidiarnosti in proporcionalnosti, ki je izražen v Pogodbi;
(ae) revise the framework decision on drug trafficking to take account of the views expressed by Parliament, with due regard for the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality enshrined in the Treaties;
(af) izvajanje znanstvene študije o stroških in dajatvah sedanjih politik za nadzor narkotikov, zlasti analize konoplje in njenih različnih zakonitih in nezakonitih izdelkov, med drugim za oceno vpliva, terapevtskega potenciala in rezultatov kriminalizacijskih politih ter mogočih alternativ; analize učinkovitosti programov razdeljevanja heroina pod medicinskim nadzorom za terapevtske namene, zato da bi zmanjšali število smrti, povezanih z drogami; analize gospodarskih, pravnih, socialnih in okoljskih stroškov politik prohibicije v smislu človeških in finančnih virov, potrebnih za izvajanje zakonodaje; ter analize vpliva sedanjih politik tako na podlagi Evropske strategije kot tudi globalnih sistemov za nadzor drog na države nečlanice;
(af) carry out a scientific study into the costs and benefits of current policies for the control of narcotic substances, including, in particular: an analysis of cannabis and its various legal and illicit derivatives, inter alia to assess their effects, their therapeutic potential and the results of criminalisation policies and possible alternatives; an analysis of the effectiveness of programmes to distribute heroin under medical supervision for therapeutic purposes in terms of the objective of reducing drug-related deaths; an analysis of the economic, legal, social and environmental costs of prohibition policies in terms of the human and financial resources required to enforce the law; and an analysis of the impact on non-member countries of current policies under both the European Strategy and the global drug control system;
(ag) poziv vladam in nacionalnim parlamentom, da začnejo z izvajanjem učinkovitih ukrepov za preprečevanje vnosa drog v zapore;
(ag) urge governments and national parliaments to take effective measures to prevent drugs entering prisons;
Predsednika pooblašča, da posreduje to priporočilo Svetu in Evropskemu svetu ter v vednost tudi Komisiji in parlamentom držav članic, Evropskemu centru za spremljanje drog in odvisnosti, Svetu Evrope in Združenim narodom in njihovim strokovnim organom.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and the European Council and, for information, to the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, the Council of Europe and the United Nations and its specialist agencies.
Strategija EU o boju proti drogam ne sme biti zasnovana na ideologiji ampak na znanstvenih dognanjih, ki morajo biti osnova za kakršno koli resno politiko boja proti širjenju drog in s tem povezanih nezakonitih dejavnosti.
The EU's anti-drugs strategy must be based not on ideology but on scientific assessments, which must be taken as a starting point for any serious policy designed to combat the spread of drugs and related illegal activities.
V Evropi se uživanje drog povečuje, kar je jasen dokaz, da se represivna, prepovedovalna politika, ki jo izvajajo države članice EU, ne more uspešno bojevati proti trgovini z drogami, ki je še vedno eden od najpomembnejših virov zaslužka organiziranih kriminalnih in terorističnih organizacij.
Narcotics consumption is on the increase within Europe and this constitutes the clearest evidence that the repressive, prohibitionist policies pursued by the EU Member States are powerless to combat the drugs trade, which continues to be one of the most important sources of income for organised crime and terrorist organisations.