natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Provision must be made for the eventuality that it is not the President of Parliament who is in the Chair at a sitting, or, by analogy, at a committee or delegation meeting, but a Vice-President, or where another body of Parliament is involved or where an incident occurs within the precincts of Parliament, in so far as it not the exclusive prerogative of the President of Parliament to impose one of the penalties provided for in Rule 147.
Provision must be made for the eventuality that it is not the President of Parliament who is in the Chair at a sitting, or, by analogy, at a committee or delegation meeting, but a Vice-President, or where another body of Parliament is involved or where an incident occurs within the precincts of Parliament, in so far as it not the exclusive prerogative of the President of Parliament to impose one of the penalties provided for in Rule 147.
Accordingly, a specific provision must be laid down so as to ensure that the matter is referred to the President whenever necessary.
Accordingly, a specific provision must be laid down so as to ensure that the matter is referred to the President whenever necessary.
Člen 147
Rule 147
V primerih hude kršitve reda ali motenja Parlamenta lahko predsednik takoj po izdaji uradnega obvestila ali najkasneje do naslednjega delnega zasedanja predlaga, da Parlament izreče grajo, ki vključuje takojšnjo odstranitev iz sejne dvorane in izključitev za dva do pet dni.
In serious cases of disorder or disruption of Parliament, the President may after giving formal notice, move, either immediately or no later than the next part-session, that Parliament pass a vote of censure which shall automatically involve immediate exclusion from the Chamber and suspension for two to five days .
V primerih izjemno hude kršitve reda ali motenja Parlamenta , ko so kršena načela iz člena 9, predsednik potem, ko je prisluhnil poslancu, sprejme utemeljen sklep in izreče ustrezen kazenski ukrep, o čemer obvesti poslanca in predsednike organov, odborov in delegacij, katerim poslanec pripada, nakar sklep predstavi na plenarnem zasedanju.
In exceptionally serious cases of disorder or disruption of Parliament in violation of the principles laid down in Rule 9 , the President , after hearing the Member concerned, shall adopt a reasoned decision laying down the appropriate penalty, which he shall notify to the Member concerned and to the chairmen of the bodies, committees and delegations on which the Member serves, before announcing them in plenary.
Parlament odloča o omenjenem disciplinskem ukrepu takrat, ko to določi predsednik, bodisi na seji, med katero je do dogodkov prišlo, bodisi, v primeru motenja zunaj sejne dvorane, ko je predsednik o tem obveščen, vendar najkasneje na naslednjem delnem zasedanju.
Parliament shall decide whether to take such disciplinary action at a time to be decided by the President, which shall be either at the sitting during which the events in question occurred or, in the case of disruption outside the Chamber, when the President was informed, or at the latest at the next part-session.
Izrečene sankcije lahko predstavljajo enega ali več od naslednjih ukrepov:
The penalty may consist of one or more of the following measures:
(b) izguba pravice do izplačila dnevnic za obdobje od 2 do 10 dni
(b) forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of between two and 10 days;
(d) v skladu s členom 18 posredovanje konferenci predsednikov predloga za začasno izključitev ali odvzem enega ali več volilnih mandatov v Parlamentu;
(d) submission to the Conference of Presidents, pursuant to Rule 18, of a proposal of suspension or removal from one or more of the elected offices held by the Member in Parliament.
[* glej Prilogo XVI(A).]
[* see Annex XVIa]
Člen 148
Rule 148
Zadevni poslanec lahko v roku največ dveh tednov od prejema obvestila o kazenskem ukrepu, ki ga je sprejel predsednik, pri predsedstvu sproži notranji postopek pritožbe, s katerim se prekine izvajanje ukrepa.
The Member concerned may lodge an internal appeal with the Bureau within two weeks of notification of the penalty imposed by the President, an appeal which shall suspend the application of that penalty.
Predsedstvo lahko najkasneje v štirih tednih po vložitvi pritožbe sprejete ukrepe razveljavi, potrdi ali ublaži, brez poseganja v pravico do zunanje pritožbe, ki je na voljo poslancu.
The Bureau may, not later than four weeks after the lodging of the appeal, annul, confirm or reduce the scale of the penalty imposed, without prejudice to the external rights of appeal open to the Member concerned.
Če v tem roku predsedstvo ne sprejme nobenega sklepa, kazenski ukrep velja za ničnega in neveljavnega.
Should the Bureau fail to take a decision within the time-limit laid down, the penalty shall be declared null and void.
Priloga XVI A (novo)
Annex XVI a (new)
PRILOGA XVI(A)
ANNEX XVIa
Smernice za enotno tolmačenje pravil ravnanja za poslance
Guidelines for the interpretation of the standards for the conduct of Members
Treba je razlikovati med vedenjskimi oblikami, ki so vidne in dopustne, če niso žaljive in/ali niso klevetanje, če ostajajo v razumnem obsegu in ne sprožajo sporov, ter med vedenjskimi oblikami, ki aktivno motijo katero koli dejavnost Parlamenta.
A distinction should be drawn between visual actions, which may be tolerated, provided they are not offensive and/or defamatory, remain within reasonable limits and do not lead to conflict, and those which actively disrupt any parliamentary activity whatsoever.
Odgovornost poslancev nastopi takoj, ko osebe, ki jih zaposlujejo ali katerim omogočijo dostop do Parlamenta, v prostorih Parlamenta ne spoštujejo pravil vedenja, ki veljajo za poslance.
Members shall be held responsible for any failure by persons whom they employ or for whom they arrange access to Parliament to comply on Parliament’s premises with the standards for the conduct of Members.
Predsednik ali njegovi predstavniki za te osebe ali katere koli druge zunanje osebe, ki se nahajajo v prostorih Parlamenta, uporabijo disciplinska pooblastila.
The President or his representatives shall exercise disciplinary powers over such persons or any other outside person present on Parliament’s premises.
Given the many incidents that have occurred over the years, mainly, but not exclusively, in the Chamber, there seems to be a need for a better definition of the conduct to be observed by Members and the ways of encouraging compliance with standards of conduct and penalties for breaches of standards of conduct if necessary.
Given the many incidents that have occurred over the years, mainly, but not exclusively, in the Chamber, there seems to be a need for a better definition of the conduct to be observed by Members and the ways of encouraging compliance with standards of conduct and penalties for breaches of standards of conduct if necessary.
Consideration therefore needs to be given to the amendment of the current provisions of Rules 146 to 148 of the Rules of Procedure, which have proved themselves to be manifestly inadequate, without, however, exceeding Parliament's remit, particularly where Members' intrinsic rights to carry out their parliamentary duties are involved, and to the delicate issue of what forms freedom of parliamentary expression may and may not take.
Consideration therefore needs to be given to the amendment of the current provisions of Rules 146 to 148 of the Rules of Procedure, which have proved themselves to be manifestly inadequate, without, however, exceeding Parliament's remit, particularly where Members' intrinsic rights to carry out their parliamentary duties are involved, and to the delicate issue of what forms freedom of parliamentary expression may and may not take.
In drawing up these proposals, your rapporteur has, therefore, sought to strike a balance that enables Parliament to be simultaneously vibrant and dignified.
In drawing up these proposals, your rapporteur has, therefore, sought to strike a balance that enables Parliament to be simultaneously vibrant and dignified.
PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED
PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED
Disruptions to the smooth conduct of the business of the House have increased in number and become more serious over the years, and there has been a increase in the number of incidents during the current parliamentary term, probably because of the greater heterogeneity and diversity in party political affiliations among the current Members.
Disruptions to the smooth conduct of the business of the House have increased in number and become more serious over the years, and there has been a increase in the number of incidents during the current parliamentary term, probably because of the greater heterogeneity and diversity in party political affiliations among the current Members.
The disturbances include repeated interruption of speakers, general uproar or uproar provoked by groups of Members, the waving of placards or banners, groups of Members wearing items of clothing bearing very specific slogans and even fisticuffs involving Members, or the disruption of events organised by or within Parliament, including by persons from outside whose access to Parliament's premises has been arranged by certain Members.
The disturbances include repeated interruption of speakers, general uproar or uproar provoked by groups of Members, the waving of placards or banners, groups of Members wearing items of clothing bearing very specific slogans and even fisticuffs involving Members, or the disruption of events organised by or within Parliament, including by persons from outside whose access to Parliament's premises has been arranged by certain Members.
Although most took place in the Chamber, some incidents occurred in conference rooms in which EP bodies were meeting or elsewhere within the precincts of Parliament.
Although most took place in the Chamber, some incidents occurred in conference rooms in which EP bodies were meeting or elsewhere within the precincts of Parliament.
GUIDELINES ADOPTED
GUIDELINES ADOPTED
Experience has shown that the instruments currently available to Parliament's authorities and bodies which bear responsibility for ensuring the smooth conduct of proceedings are no longer suited to the much larger number and range of incidents now occurring and that they allow neither such incidents to be prevented from happening nor proportionate - or simply effective - penalties to be imposed.
Experience has shown that the instruments currently available to Parliament's authorities and bodies which bear responsibility for ensuring the smooth conduct of proceedings are no longer suited to the much larger number and range of incidents now occurring and that they allow neither such incidents to be prevented from happening nor proportionate - or simply effective - penalties to be imposed.
The amendments to the Rules of Procedure which your rapporteur is proposing, partly on the basis of the comparative study into the situation in the national parliaments (PE 360.483) and of the opinion submitted by the Legal Service to the meeting of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of 13 June 2005, seek to clarify the standards for the conduct of Members with which Members of the European Parliament are required to comply, both within Parliament and during the course of activities in which Parliament is involved, and to spell out the consequences of failure to do so, with a view to ensuring that Parliament may conduct its business in a civilised manner and maintain the dignity incumbent upon it as an EU institution and as a parliament.
The amendments to the Rules of Procedure which your rapporteur is proposing, partly on the basis of the comparative study into the situation in the national parliaments (PE 360.483) and of the opinion submitted by the Legal Service to the meeting of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of 13 June 2005, seek to clarify the standards for the conduct of Members with which Members of the European Parliament are required to comply, both within Parliament and during the course of activities in which Parliament is involved, and to spell out the consequences of failure to do so, with a view to ensuring that Parliament may conduct its business in a civilised manner and maintain the dignity incumbent upon it as an EU institution and as a parliament.
Since this is not a proposal for a general revision of the Rules of Procedure, the amendments would be made within the current structure of the Rules of Procedure and would not affect the numbering of the Rules.
Since this is not a proposal for a general revision of the Rules of Procedure, the amendments would be made within the current structure of the Rules of Procedure and would not affect the numbering of the Rules.
At the end of a long debate in the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and frequent discussions with the various political groups’ shadow rapporteurs, your rapporteur has tabled a double series of compromise amendments (PE 364.769 and PE 365.104), the second of which is complete and thus partly replaces the first.
At the end of a long debate in the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and frequent discussions with the various political groups’ shadow rapporteurs, your rapporteur has tabled a double series of compromise amendments (PE 364.769 and PE 365.104), the second of which is complete and thus partly replaces the first.
Apart from simplifying the procedures initially proposed (see PE 357.945), these new amendments aim to further strengthen Members’ rights, without undermining the objective of guaranteeing the efficacy, the political neutrality and the rapidity of the measures to be taken and to give the President of Parliament, and not the House the power to take them, with an internal appeals procedure being established so as to protect the right of defence.
Apart from simplifying the procedures initially proposed (see PE 357.945), these new amendments aim to further strengthen Members’ rights, without undermining the objective of guaranteeing the efficacy, the political neutrality and the rapidity of the measures to be taken and to give the President of Parliament, and not the House the power to take them, with an internal appeals procedure being established so as to protect the right of defence.
With a view to maintaining the vibrancy of the debates, whilst ensuring that they do not degenerate into anarchy, your rapporteur is proposing that a distinction be drawn between silent demonstrations and those that clearly disrupt Parliament's business.
With a view to maintaining the vibrancy of the debates, whilst ensuring that they do not degenerate into anarchy, your rapporteur is proposing that a distinction be drawn between silent demonstrations and those that clearly disrupt Parliament's business.
The former category might cover a situation in which Members 'displayed' their opinions in some form or other, which would be tolerated only to the extent that it did not adversely affect mutual respect and was not in itself the direct cause of the disruptions covered by the second category.
The former category might cover a situation in which Members 'displayed' their opinions in some form or other, which would be tolerated only to the extent that it did not adversely affect mutual respect and was not in itself the direct cause of the disruptions covered by the second category.
The second category might cover all forms of disruption caused by speaking out of turn, using insulting language, causing an uproar or other organised disturbances, up to and including acts of physical violence.
The second category might cover all forms of disruption caused by speaking out of turn, using insulting language, causing an uproar or other organised disturbances, up to and including acts of physical violence.
In this respect, the duration of the 'disruption' and/or whether it is repeated will also have to be taken into account so as to enable an assessment to be made of the extent to which it may be tolerated and/or the applicable penalty to be determined.
In this respect, the duration of the 'disruption' and/or whether it is repeated will also have to be taken into account so as to enable an assessment to be made of the extent to which it may be tolerated and/or the applicable penalty to be determined.
Accordingly, the Member in the Chair will have to have at his or her disposal a range of measures and instruments enabling him or her to react swiftly and effectively, initially in order to prevent the situation from degenerating and, should this prove impossible, to call on the assistance of the ushers or, in extremely serious cases, of Parliament's Security Service (something which is already provided for in Rule 146(3) of the Rules of Procedure), who will also need to be better prepared to deal with such situations.
Accordingly, the Member in the Chair will have to have at his or her disposal a range of measures and instruments enabling him or her to react swiftly and effectively, initially in order to prevent the situation from degenerating and, should this prove impossible, to call on the assistance of the ushers or, in extremely serious cases, of Parliament's Security Service (something which is already provided for in Rule 146(3) of the Rules of Procedure), who will also need to be better prepared to deal with such situations.
In addition to the immediate measures available to the Member in the Chair and already laid down in the Rules of Procedure, there is also the issue of what, if any, penalties should be imposed on the Members who caused the disruption and what procedures need to be put in place for this purpose.
In addition to the immediate measures available to the Member in the Chair and already laid down in the Rules of Procedure, there is also the issue of what, if any, penalties should be imposed on the Members who caused the disruption and what procedures need to be put in place for this purpose.
To that end, bearing in mind the serious nature of the offences committed, and having had an appropriate request referred to him, the President of Parliament must have the power to select the appropriate penalties from among those expressly laid down in the Rules of Procedure.
To that end, bearing in mind the serious nature of the offences committed, and having had an appropriate request referred to him, the President of Parliament must have the power to select the appropriate penalties from among those expressly laid down in the Rules of Procedure.
The scale of penalties proposed simply takes over, and rationalises, the measures already set out in Annex VII to the Rules of Procedure, in Rule 18 thereof and in the Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament.
The scale of penalties proposed simply takes over, and rationalises, the measures already set out in Annex VII to the Rules of Procedure, in Rule 18 thereof and in the Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament.
These penalties deliberately do not affect the exercise by Members of their right to vote in plenary, since that represents the very essence of the office to which the Members were elected, i.e. principally to take part in the Union's legislative process.
These penalties deliberately do not affect the exercise by Members of their right to vote in plenary, since that represents the very essence of the office to which the Members were elected, i.e. principally to take part in the Union's legislative process.
Whatever the situation, the President, or - in the event of an appeal - the Bureau, must be given adequate discretionary powers and should tailor the action taken to the degree of seriousness of the incident.
Whatever the situation, the President, or - in the event of an appeal - the Bureau, must be given adequate discretionary powers and should tailor the action taken to the degree of seriousness of the incident.
However, if penalties are to be introduced, provision will need to be made for a procedure which guarantees the right of defence and enables the Member concerned to be heard and, where appropriate, to appeal against the decision.
However, if penalties are to be introduced, provision will need to be made for a procedure which guarantees the right of defence and enables the Member concerned to be heard and, where appropriate, to appeal against the decision.
Without such a procedure, Parliament would run the risk of being brought before the Court of Justice.
Without such a procedure, Parliament would run the risk of being brought before the Court of Justice.
If adopted, such a procedure would provide greater legal security and new rights, which would benefit Members.
If adopted, such a procedure would provide greater legal security and new rights, which would benefit Members.
These include specific reference to the protection offered by primary law and the Statute for Members, extension of the commonly accepted forms of expression, introduction of an obligation to provide individual information and to explain all measures taken under these provisions, the right to be heard and to lodge internal appeals against penalties (which would have the effect of suspending the penalty and which would lead to the penalty becoming null and void if the Bureau fails to respond) and protection of the right to vote in plenary.
These include specific reference to the protection offered by primary law and the Statute for Members, extension of the commonly accepted forms of expression, introduction of an obligation to provide individual information and to explain all measures taken under these provisions, the right to be heard and to lodge internal appeals against penalties (which would have the effect of suspending the penalty and which would lead to the penalty becoming null and void if the Bureau fails to respond) and protection of the right to vote in plenary.
In recommending approval of these proposals, your rapporteur is convinced that they will provide an adequate, balanced response to the problems that led to their formulation.
In recommending approval of these proposals, your rapporteur is convinced that they will provide an adequate, balanced response to the problems that led to their formulation.
Spremembe Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta kar zadeva pravila ravnanja za poslance
Amendments to be made to the European Parliament's Rules of Procedure relating to standards for the conduct of Members of the European Parliament
člen 202
Rule 202
Obravnavani predlog(i) spremembe
Proposal(s) for amendment considered
Datum razglasitve dovoljenja na zasedanju
Date authorisation announced in plenary
Kot opazovalec skupine PSE je bil navzoč:
Present as an observer (PSE Group):
o obdobju za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji
on the period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
PE 364.708v01-00
PE 364.708v02-00
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA....................................................2
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...............................................3
PISMO ODBORA ZA EKONOMSKE IN MONETARNE ZADEVE.......................................8
LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS.........10
PISMO ODBORA ZA PROMET IN TURIZEM........................................................................9
LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT AND TOURISM.............................11
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve ........................................................................11
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................12
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ............................16
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............18
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................19
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................21
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ......................................22
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...24
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ..................................................27
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ................................29