natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 14 D (novo) Člen 24 a (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 999/2001)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 14 D (new) Article 24 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 999/2001)
(14d) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
(14d) The following Article shall be inserted:
Sklepi, ki se sprejemajo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 24 (2), omenjenim v prvem in tretjem pododstavku člena 5(2), členu 6 (1), (1a), (1b) (a) in (b) ter (3), členu 7(2), (3), (4), (4a) in (5), členu 8(1), (4), (5) in (6), členu 9(1), drugem pododstavku člena 12(1), pododstavku 1a člena 13(1) in (6) ter členu 15(3), temeljijo na oceni mogočega tveganja za zdravje ljudi in živali ter, ob upoštevanju obstoječih znanstvenih dokazov, ohranjajo ali, če je znanstveno upravičeno, povečajo raven varstva zdravja ljudi in živali, ki se zagotavlja v Skupnosti.“
Decisions to be adopted in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 24 (2), referred to in Article 5(2), first and third subparagraphs, Article 6(1), (1a), (1b) (a) and (b) and (3), Article 7(2), (3), (4), (4a) and (5), Article 8(1), (4), (5) and (6), Article 9(1), Article 12(1), second subparagraph, Article 13(1), subparagraph 1a, and (6), and Article 15(3), shall be based on an assessment of the possible risks for human and animal health and shall, taking into account existing scientific evidence, maintain, or if scientifically justified increase, the level of protection of human and animal health ensured in the Community."
Ta predlog spremembe zagotovi, da lahko le Komisija in države članice spreminjajo ključne vidike te uredbe s postopkom komitologije, če priložijo obrazložitev, da je znižanje ravni zdravja ljudi in živali izključeno.
This amendment shall ensure that crucial aspects of this Regulation can only be changed by the Commission and Member States in the comitology procedure if a justification is given that a reduction of the level of human and animal health is excluded.
Na koncu predlog spremembe nekatere določbe te uredbe opredeli kot posebno občutljive in želi sporočiti zakonodajalcem, da se na gospodarske zadeve ne osredotočajo na neprimeren način.
At the bottom line the amendment declares certain provisions of the Regulation as particularly sensitive and wants to sensibilise the regulators not to focus in an inappropriate manner on economic aspects.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 14 E (novo)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 14 E (new)
Priloga IV, točka II (A a) (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 999/2001)
Annex IV, point II (A a) (new) (Regulation (EC) No 999/2001)
(14e) Prilogi IV(II) se doda naslednja točka (Aa):
(14e) In Annex IV(II), the following point (Aa) shall be inserted:
Na zahtevo države članice se krmljenje neprežvekovalcev z beljakovinami, pridobljenimi iz sesalcev, lahko dovoli, če:
At the request of a Member State , the feeding to non ‑ruminants of protein derived from mammals may be permitted, provided that:
(a) je dokazano, da so izpolnjene zahteve iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002, in
(a) the requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 are shown to be complied with, and
(b) če je Skupnost potrdila test, ki razlikuje med vrstami.“
(b) a test which differentiates between species has been validated by the Community."
Razlikovalni pristop k ravnanju z živalskimi stranskimi proizvodi, predvidenimi v Uredbi št. 1774/2002, se zdaj izvaja.
The differentiated approach to the treatment of animal by products provided for in Regulation No 1774/2002 is now being implemented.
Ko bo mogoče zagotoviti, da se lahko izpolnjevanje pravil (npr. prepoved kanibalizma) učinkovito spremlja, se bodo neprežvekovalci lahko ponovno krmili s stranskimi proizvodi iz živali za zakol, ki so namenjeni za prehrano ljudi, potem ko se bodo ti stranski proizvodi sterilizirani s paro pod tlakom.
By products of slaughter animals intended for human consumption should therefore, after steam pressure sterilisation, again be allowed to be fed to non ruminants, once it is possible to ensure that compliance with the rules (e.g. prohibiting cannibalism) can be monitored effectively.
Predlog Komisije iz decembra 2004 je imel prvotno dva glavna cilja:
The Commission's proposal from December 2004 initially had two main objectives:
Podaljšati prehodne ukrepe, ki temeljijo na tej uredbi, za nadaljnji dve leti.
To prolong the transitional measures based on this regulation for another two years.
Prvo podaljšanje sta leta 2003 določila Parlament in Svet.
The first prolongation was decided by Parliament and Council in 2003.
Sicer bi ti prehodni ukrepi pretekli 1. julija 2005, ne da bi Komisija zaključila kategorizacijo držav v skladu s to uredbo.
Otherwise, these transitional measures would have expired on 1 July 2005 without the finalisation of the categorisation of countries according to this regulation by the Commission.
Vložiti nekatere predloge sprememb k tej uredbi v zvezi s pričakovanim sprejetjem novega poglavja o BSE v kodeksu OIE za zdravje živali (OIE – Svetovna organizacija za zdravje živali, 167 držav članic).
To make certain amendments to this regulation with regard to the expected adoption of a new BSE-chapter of the OIE animal health codex (OIE - World organisation for animal health, 167 Member States).
V tem novem poglavju bi se število kategorij tveganja BSE zmanjšalo s pet na tri.
This new chapter would reduce the BSE risk categories from five to three.
Med prvimi razpravami o predlogu v začetku leta 2005 ni bilo mogoče predvideti, ali bo OIE dejansko dosegel sporazum glede novega poglavja o BSE.
At the time of the first discussions on the proposal in early 2005 it was not foreseeable if the OIE would in fact eventually find an agreement on a new BSE-chapter.
Razen tega ni bilo jasno, ali bo zmanjšanje kategorij tveganja BSE spremljalo sprejetje novega poglavja o nadzoru v kodeksu OIE, ki zagotavlja stroge in skladne ukrepe aktivnega in pasivnega nadziranja za razjasnitev stanja TSE v državi članici ali tretji državi.
It was also unclear if the reduction of BSE risk categories would be accompanied by the adoption of a new chapter on surveillance of the OIE-codex which provides strict and coherent active and passive surveillance measures in order to get a clear picture of the TSE-situation in a Member State or third country.
Poročevalka je predlagala tako razdelitev predloga, da se omogoči sprejetje potrebnega podaljšanja prehodnih ukrepov junija 2005 v sporazumu s Svetom v prvi obravnavi.
The rapporteur proposed to split the proposal in such a way that the necessary prolongation of the transitional measures could be adopted in June 2005 in a first reading agreement with Council.
Preostali del predloga je čakal na razprave v prvi obravnavi v Parlamentu, da se omogoči poglobljena razprava o možnih spremembah.
The rest of the proposal kept pending for discussions in Parliaments first reading in order to allow a profound discussion on potential changes.
Za olajšanje teh razprav je poročevalka zahtevala, da Komisija predstavi svoja stališča in mnenja glede prihodnjega boja proti TSE/BSE.
To facilitate these discussions, the rapporteur asked the Commission to present its views and perspective for the future fight against TSE/ BSE.
Razlog za to je, da so bile številne spremembe Uredbe TSE, sprejete v zadnjih letih v obliki komitoloških odločb, kar je povzročilo mozaik ukrepov brez jasne slike splošne strategije za to pomembno vprašanje.
The reason for this was that many changes on the TSE-regulation have been adopted in the last years in form of comitology decisions what lead to a patchwork of measures giving no clear picture of the overall strategy on this important issue.
Komisija je upoštevala ta predlog in julija 2005 predstavila „načrt za prihodnji boj proti TSE“.
The Commission followed this proposal and presented in July 2005 a "roadmap on the future fight against TSE".
Ta izčrpni dokument so zelo cenile vse zainteresirane strani, Parlament in Svet ter daje jasen vpogled v delo, ki ga namerava Komisija opraviti v naslednjih letih v zvezi s TSE.
This comprehensive paper was very much appreciated from all stakeholders, Parliament and Council and gives a clear view on what the Commission intents to do in the coming years on TSE.
Načrt, ki ni nujno enak kot vprašanja, obravnavana v predlogu Komisije za spremembo te uredbe, je bil tudi podlaga za razprave na okrogli mizi o BSE/TSE, ki jo je organizirala poročevalka v Evropskem parlamentu 22. in 23. septembra 2005 ter na kateri so sodelovali direktorji veterinarskih uprav iz 25 držav članic ter Generalni sekretariat Komisije in Sveta.
The roadmap, which is not necessary identical with the issues addressed in the Commissions proposal for changing this regulation, was also basis for discussions during a Roundtable on BSE/TSE organised by the rapporteur in the European Parliament on 22 and 23 September 2005 with participation of all Chief Veterinary Officers from the 25 Member States as well as Commission and Council General Secretariat.
Načrt je bil predstavljen tudi na seji zainteresiranih strani pri Evropski komisiji novembra 2005, ob tej priložnosti se je o njem potem razpravljajo s poročevalko.
The roadmap was also presented during a stakeholder meeting in the European Commission in November 2005 and subsequently discussed on this occasion with the rapporteur.
Številne druge izmenjave mnenj z britanskim in avstrijskim predsedstvom, znanstveniki ali zdravniki so razjasnile, katere spremembe so razumne in potrebne.
Many other exchanges of views with the British and Austrian Presidencies, scientists or practioners gave a clear picture on what changes are reasonable and necessary.
Poročevalka se strinja z nekaterimi spremembami v predlogu.
The rapporteur agrees with some of the changes in the proposal.
Zlasti najpomembnejše vprašanje, zmanjšanje števila kategorij tveganja BSE, je sprejemljivo in potrebno kot mednarodno dogovorjen program ukrepov v zvezi s BSE/TSE ter se lahko končno po več letih razprav sprejme na ravni OIE.
Particularly the most important issue, the reduction of the BSE-risk categories, is acceptable as an internationally agreed scheme for BSE/ TSE-measures is needed and finally, after years of discussions, could be agreed on OIE-level.
Zato bo v prihodnosti mogoče dobiti sliko razširjenosti TSE v državah, za katere zdaj podatki niso na voljo.
Thus, it will be possible in the future to get a picture of TSE-prevalence from countries for which currently no data is available.
Spremembe seveda povzročajo precej manj natančno opredeljene kategorije; zato je najpomembnejše določbe Uredbe treba ločiti, da se zagotovi določen standard.
The changes naturally lead much less defined categories; this is why the most important provisions of the regulation should be ring fenced to ensure a certain standard.
To velja na primer za ukrepe aktivnega in pasivnega spremljanja TSE ali za minimalne standarde, ki so na seznamu snovi s specifičnim tveganjem.
This applies e.g. for active and passive TSE monitoring measures or for minimum standards on the list of specified risk material.
Sledijo glavne točke, vključene v predloge sprememb:
The following are the main points raised by the amendments:
Sprejetje zakonodajnega besedila o novem poglavju o BSE v kodeksu OIE za zdravje živali, kot je bilo dogovorjeno maja 2005.
Adaptation of the legislative text on the new BSE Chapter of the OIE's animal health codex as agreed in May 2005.
Opredelitev strogih standardov za pasivno in aktivno nadziranje v členih Uredbe, da se zagotovi, da zmanjšanje števila kategorij ne povzroči manjšega števila ali napačnih informacij o epidemiološkem stanju v državi.
Defining strict passive and active surveillance standards in the articles of the regulation in order to ensure that the reduction of categories does not lead to fewer or inaccurate information on the epidemiological situation in a country.
To je zelo pomembna točka, ker se potrošniki lahko ustrezno zaščitijo le, če so na voljo zanesljivi podatki o dejanskem stanju v različnih državah in regijah.
This is a very important point as the consumers can only be protected appropriate if reliable data on the actual situation in the different countries and regions are available.
Predlaga se določba, ki državam članicam z veliko prevalenco pozitivnih primerov TSE dovoljuje uporabo bolj prožnega programa preiskav, če ta temelji na najvišjih znanstvenih standardih.
A provision is proposed to allow Member States with a very positive TSE-prevalence to apply a more flexible testing scheme if this is based on the highest scientific standards.
Prepričanje, da je spoštovanje naravnega življenja in prehranjevalnih pogojev rejnih živali ključno za varstvo zdravja ljudi in živali, je močno razširjeno med zakonodajalci in potrošniki.
The conviction that the respect of the natural living and nutrition conditions of farmed animals is key to protect human and animal health is widespread amongst regulators and consumers.
To bo vključeno v Uredbo TSE, ker je kriza BSE znatno prispevala k temu novemu pristopu.
The TSE-regulation shall reflect this as the BSE-crisis was largely contributing to this new approach.
Uvede se določba, ki Komisiji dovoljuje, da določi – če je to potrebno – ravni tolerance za prisotnost minimalnih virov živalskih proteinov zaradi naključne kontaminacije krme.
A provision shall be introduced to allow the Commission to set - if necessary - tolerance levels for the presence of minimal sources of animal proteins caused through adventous contamination in feeding stuff.
Sestava kratkega seznama snovi s specifičnim tveganjem (SRM).
Setting up a minimal list of Specified Risk Materials (SRM).
Odstranitev snovi s specifičnim tveganjem je eden najpomembnejših in najučinkovitejših ukrepov v boju proti TSE.
The removal of SRM (Specified risk material) is one of the most important and effective measures against TSEs.
V primeru prevalence pozitivnih primerov TSE/BSE so spremembe seznama snovi s specifičnim tveganjem glede na znanstveni napredek nujne.
A positive TSE/BSE prevalence makes changes to list of SRMs according to the scientific progress necessary.
Seznam zato ne more biti statičen.
The list can, therefore, not be static.
V prihodnosti bodo potrebni predlogi sprememb, kot je nedaven dvig starosti za obvezno odstranitev hrbtenic.
Amendments like the recent lift of the age from which the vertebral column has to be removed will be necessary in future.
Spremembe politike izločanja živali v primerjavi s sedanjim stanjem.
Changes to the culling policy compared to the current situation.
Med številnimi razpravami je postalo jasno, da strogo izločanje živali iz kohort ni vedno upravičeno.
During many discussions it became clear that the strict culling of cohort animals is not always justified.
Dokler je zagotovljeno, da te živali ne dosežejo prehranske verige, odpira določba iz člena 13 možnost za uporabo teh živali iz kohort do konca njihovega produktivnega življenja.
As long as it is assured that those animals do not reach the food chain, the provision in Article 13 shall open the possibility for using those cohort animals until the end of their productive life.
Področje uporabe dovoljenj, izdanih po postopku komitologije, ki jih zagotavlja Uredba je že bilo pomembno vprašanje na pogajanjih med institucijami pri sprejemanju Uredbe leta 2000/2001.
The scope of comitology authorisations granted by this regulation was already a major issue during the negotiations between the institutions when adopting the regulation in 2000/ 2001.
Od takrat je Komisija skupaj z državami članicami po delih sprejela zapleten seznam sprememb, pogosto tako, da Parlament ni mogel nameniti ustrezne pozornosti tem spremembam.
Since then the Commission together with the Member States piecewise adopted a complex list of modifications, often without Parliament really being in the position to pay due attention to those changes.
Ker imajo komitološke odločbe pogosto precejšen političen vpliv, nov člen 24a navaja seznam najbolj občutljivih dovoljenj iz Uredbe, izdanih po postopkih komitologije, ter zahteva, da zakonodajalci natančno utemeljijo, da se v predlogih prihodnjih sprememb raven zdravja ljudi ali živali nikakor ne bo znižala.
As comitology decisions often have a considerable political impact, a new article 24a shall list the most sensible comitology authorisations of the regulation and oblige the regulators to profoundly justify that the level of animal or human health will in no circumstances be reduced when proposing future changes.
Maja 2005 je razdelil Parlament predlog Komisije na dva dela z namenom, da je na eni strani v skladu s časovnimi roki lahko obravnaval nujno podaljšanje prehodnih določb v zvezi z geografsko pogojenimi tveganji, in na drugi strani lahko omogočil obsežno in podrobno plenarno ter medinstitucionalno razpravo o prihodnosti predpisov Skupnosti o preprečevanju TSE.
The Commission proposal was split by Parliament into two parts in May 2005, on the one hand in order to deal promptly with the urgent need to extend the transitional measures with regard to geographical risk classification, and on the other hand to enable a thorough debate to be held within Parliament and at the interinstitutional level on the future shape of Community rules for combating TSEs.
To mnenje se nanaša na drugi del.
This opinion deals with the second part.
Ne glede na svoj predhodni zakonodajni predlog decembra 2004 je Komisija objavila delovni dokument z namenom, da vzpodbudi in oblikuje razpravo o prihodnosti previdnostnih ukrepov (glej
As well as its original legislative proposal submitted in December 2004, the Commission has published a working document to stimulate and provide a structure for debate on the future direction of measures to protect against TSEs (
O predlogu Komisije:
Commission proposal:
Razen nujnega podaljšanja roka za prehodne ukrepe o geografsko pogojeni klasifikaciji (status BSE) zadevajo številne predlagane spremembe uredbe premik posameznih točk v besedilu uredbe (ki sta ga Parlament in Svet skupno sprejela) v priloge, ki bodo lahko v postopku komitologije spremenjene oziroma prilagojene.
Apart from the necessary extension of the period for transitional measures in respect of geographical risk classification (BSE status), many of the proposed amendments to the Regulation relate to the transfer of individual points from the body of the Regulation (adopted jointly by Parliament and the Council) to the annexes, which may be amended or adjusted under the commitology procedure.
O načrtu izvajanja TSE:
TSE Roadmap:
Ob upoštevanju zmanjševanja števila primerov obolelosti za BSE v primerjavi z vrhuncem krize BSE, tako v Združenem kraljestvu kot tudi na drugih območjih Evropske unije, se pojavlja vprašanje, na kakšen način naj zakonodajalec oblikuje "vstop v izstop" iz akutnega kriznega upravljanja.
In the light of the fall in the incidence of BSE compared with the peak reached during the BSE crisis, both in the United Kingdom and in other areas of the European Union, the question arises as to how the legislature should begin to address the process of moving on from the acute crisis management phase.
V zadnjem desetletju je Evropski parlament odločilno vplival na reakcije politike glede krize BSE, ne nazadnje s preiskovalnim odborom za BSE, zatem z izglasovanjem nezaupnice, s seznamom zahtev glede politike Skupnosti in stalnim spremljanjem "odbora za BSE" pri izvajanju tega seznama zahtev.
Over the past decade Parliament has had a decisive influence on the political response to the BSE crisis, not least through the committee of inquiry into BSE, the subsequent 'conditional motion of censure', the list of demands in relation to Community policy and the ongoing monitoring of the implementation of these demands by the BSE follow‑up committee.
Od sprejetja okvirne uredbe o TSE št. 999/2001/ES o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij, kot tudi Uredbe št. 1774/2002/ES o ravnanju z živalskimi stranskimi proizvodi, je bilo v okviru postopka komitologije sprejeto veliko število odločitev, na katerih je bil EP, kot je znano, komaj soudeležen.
However, since the adoption of the TSE framework Directive No (EC) 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, and of Regulation No (EC) 1774/2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products, a large number of decisions have been adopted under the commitology procedure, in which - as we all know - the EP plays little part.
Že samo uredba o TSE je z odločitvami Komisije v skladu s členom 24 doživela devetnajst sprememb od objave junija 2001.
The TSE Regulation alone has been amended 19 times through Commission decisions pursuant to Article 24 since its publication in June 2001.
Nekatere izmed odločitev, sprejete v skladu s postopkom komitologije, so bile nadvse sporne.
Some of these decisions taken under the commitology procedure have been extremely controversial.
Po množičnem odporu EP je bil predlog Komisije, da ponovno dovoli krmljenje prežvekovalcev z ribjo moko, umaknjen (čeprav za to ni bilo nikakršne pravne obveze).
For example, the Commission's proposal to again allow fishmeal to be fed to ruminants was withdrawn following huge protests from the EP (although there was no legal requirement to withdraw it).
Predpisi za krmljenje v prilogi IV uredbe so v zakonodajnem besedilu iz leta 2001 prvotno obsegali le polovico strani, medtem pa so se razširili na devet strani podrobnih predpisov in izjem dejanskega stanja – v okviru komitologije in brez primerne udeležbe EP.
The provisions on feeding laid down in Annex IV to the Regulation have been expanded - under the commitology procedure, without appropriate involvement of the EP - from half a page in the 2001 legal text to nine pages of detailed provisions and derogations.
Pripravljavec tega osnutka mnenja je prepričan, da mora Evropski parlament prevzeti svojo odgovornost v razpravah in soočenjih glede prihodnjega oblikovanja varstva potrošnikov na področju TSE.
Your draftsman believes that Parliament must be able to play its proper part in the debate on the future shape of consumer protection policy in relation to TSEs.
Večina političnih možnosti, ki jih trenutno predlaga načrt izvajanja TSE, zadeva podrobna pravila prilog in na ta način niso sestavni del zakonodajnega postopka.
Most of the policy options currently being proposed in the TSE Roadmap relate to the detailed provisions laid down in the annexes and do not come under legislative procedures.
Ker se na eni strani urejanje predpisov o (četudi pomembnih) podrobnostih temeljnega zakonodajnega besedila in s tem tudi v okviru postopka soodločanja zdi neizvedljivo in neprimerno, je treba poiskati način, kako premostiti primanjkljaje pri postopku komitologije in kako Parlamentu omogočiti primerno soudeležbo pri oblikovanju prihodnje politike Skupnosti.
As, however, it would be neither practicable nor appropriate to lay down provisions on (albeit important) details in the basic legal act, using the codecision procedure, ways should be found of addressing the shortcomings of the commitology procedure and enabling Parliament to play an appropriate part in shaping future Community policy.
Pripravljavec mnenja zatorej predlaga ustanovitev medinstitucionalne delovne skupine, v kateri se predstavniki Parlamenta, Komisije in Sveta lahko neuradno posvetujejo o morebitni prilagoditvi prilog uredbe in kjer se morebitna različna izhodišča lahko pojasnijo že pred sklepom v okviru komitologije.
Your draftsman is therefore proposing the setting up of an interinstitutional working party, within which representatives of Parliament, the Commission and the Council will be able to informally discuss possible adjustments to the annexes to the Regulation and already resolve any differences in positions prior to the adoption of a decision under the commitology procedure.
Zaradi tega je izrednega pomena, da se omenjena delovna skupina pravočasno vključi v delo stalnih odborov.
To that end, the working party will need to be involved at an early stage in the work of the Standing Committees.