natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prav tako bo moralo izpolniti pričakovanja evropske družbe in prispevati k ohranjanju kakovosti hrane, biotske raznovrstnosti, vodnih virov in dobrega počutja živali.
It will also have to meet expectations of European society to help safeguarding food quality, biodiversity, water resources and animal welfare’.
Ali se Komisija zaveda, da bodo za uresničitev teh izzivov potrebne obsežne naložbe v kmetijstvo, kar je v nasprotju s ciljem, da se bistveno zmanjšajo proračunska sredstva?
Is the Commission aware that, in order to be able to meet such challenges, massive investment in agriculture will be needed, which is contrary to the goal of significant budgetary reduction?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0128/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0128/09
Zadeva: Piratstvo ob obalah Somalije
Subject: Piracy off the coast of Somalia
Piratska dejanja ob obalah Somalije od septembra zelo naraščajo.
The number of acts of piracy off the coast of Somalia has increased considerably since September.
Tako na primer 36 članov posadke ladje Alakrana že mesec in pol držijo v ujetništvu.
For example, 36 crew members from the fishing vessel Alakrana have been held captive for the last six weeks.
Čeprav so sile Atalante v Adenskem zalivu že pokazale svojo učinkovitost, zadnji napadi kažejo, da se zmogljivosti piratov povečujejo, saj so okrepili svoje dejavnosti ob vzhodni obali Afrike.
Even though the Atalanta force has shown its effectiveness in the Gulf of Aden, the recent attacks suggest that the pirates’ capabilities are growing as they step up their activity off east Africa.
Zadnji napad se je zgodil daleč proč, 200 navtičnih milj severno od Sejšelov in 650 milj od somalijske obale.
The latest attack occurred 200 nautical miles north of the Seychelles and 650 miles off the Somali coast.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi lahko reševali problem piratstva ob somalijski obali skladno z določili, sprejetimi v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta s 14. oktobra 2008?
Does the Commission agree with the idea of solving the problem of piracy off the Somali coast according to the approach approved in the EP resolution of 14 October 2008?
Ali se Komisija strinja s tem, da pošlje vojaško spremstvo na ribiške in tovorne ladje, podobno kot to že poteka na francoskih ladjah?
Is it in favour of putting military escorts on board fishing and cargo vessels, as is already the case on French vessels?
Ali bi bile te vojaške sile lahko sestavljene iz evropskih vojaških sil na podlagi EU Navfor?
Could these escorts be part of a European military force based on EU NAVFOR?
Kakšno je stališče Komisije glede priporočil Mednarodne pomorske organizacije, naj se na ladje ne pošilja zasebnih varnostnih služb, ne glede na to, ali gre za ribiške ali trgovske ladje?
What is its position on the International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) advice not to put private security personnel on board fishing or trading vessels?
Kaj pa kombinacija zasebnih in vojaških sil in pravne posledice?
What about a combination of private and military personnel, and what would be the legal implications?
Kako lahko Komisija pritisne na države članice, da bi vzpostavile stalen pravni instrument za sojenje piratom, ki so jih aretirali?
How can it put pressure on the Member States to establish a permanent legal instrument for judging arrested pirates?
Ali bi po mnenju Komisije regionalni sporazumi, podpisani v Džibutiju med obalnimi državami Adenskega zaliva pod okriljem Mednarodne pomorske organizacije januarja 2009, lahko pripomogli k iskanju lokalne rešitve za pirate in somalijskim oblastem pomagali pri spopadanju s tem problemom?
Does it think the regional agreement between the coastal states of the Gulf of Aden, signed in Djibouti in January 2009 under the aegis of the IMO, may be useful with a view to finding a local solution to piracy and helping the Somali authorities tackle this problem?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0129/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0129/09
Zadeva: Varnost in interoperabilnost železniškega sistema Skupnosti
Subject: Safety and interoperability of the Community railway system
Čeprav je železniški sistem Skupnosti zelo varen in se je v preteklih letih z liberalizacijo trga še izboljšal, se zaradi nedavnih smrtonosnih nesreč v Italiji (Viareggiu) in na Nizozemskem pojavlja veliko vprašanj v zvezi z varnostjo in vzdrževanjem tovornih vagonov.
Although the Community railway system is very safe and has been improved in recent years under market liberalisation, recent fatal accidents in Italy (Viareggio) and the Netherlands have raised questions with regard to safety and the maintenance of freight wagons.
Direktiva o varnosti na železnicah, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2008/110/ES , določa, da ima vsako vozilo subjekt, ki je zadolžen za vzdrževanje, in da mora Komisija do 24. decembra 2010 za tovorne vagone in do 24. decembra 2018 za ostala železniška vozila sprejeti ukrep o vzpostavitvi sistema potrjevanja subjektov, zadolženih za vzdrževanje.
The Railway Safety Directive (RSD), as amended by Directive 2008/110/EC , provides that each vehicle shall have an entity in charge of its maintenance (ECM), for which the Commission shall adopt a measure establishing a system of certification by 24 December 2010 in the case of freight wagons and 24 December 2018 for all railway vehicles.
V poročilu o napredku pri izvajanju Direktive o varnosti na železnici in direktiv o interoperabilnosti železniškega sistema je Komisija izjavila, da je razdrobljenost, ki jo povzročajo nacionalni pogoji (standardi/pravila) še vedno ovira za vseevropsko železniško območje, četudi so bila v povezovanje železniških sistemov vložena znatna finančna, politična in kadrovska sredstva.
In its progress report on the implementation of the RSD and the railway interoperability directives , the Commission states that the segmentation resulting from national requirements (standards/rules) is still a barrier to a Europe-wide rail area, even though substantial financial, political and human resources have been invested in integrating railway systems.
Poleg tega namerava Komisija pregledati svojo politiko o interoperabilnosti in varnosti železniškega sistema, kakor je napovedala v poročilu o napredku.
Furthermore, as announced in the progress report, the Commission intends to review its policies on interoperability and the safety of the Community railway system.
Kateri kratkoročni praktični ukrepi bi bili po mnenju Komisije primerni za izboljšanje varnosti železniških tovornih vagonov?
In the short term, what practical measures does it consider appropriate in order to enhance the safety of rail freight wagons?
Ali namerava Komisija pospešiti sprejetje sistema potrjevanja subjektov, zadolženih za vzdrževanje, in zagotoviti varnejši okvir Skupnosti, ne da bi akterjem v železniškem prometu hkrati naložila novo breme?
Does it intend to accelerate the adoption of the ECM certification system and to provide a safer Community framework without imposing additional barriers on railway actors?
Katere nacionalne prakse ali vrzeli, ki ovirajo interoperabilnost in negativno vplivajo na železniški sistem, so bile ugotovljene?
What national practices or loopholes have been identified that create barriers to interoperability and have a critical influence on the railway system?
Na katerih zemljepisnih območjih se pojavljajo in katere nove kratkoročne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bi jih odpravila?
Where do these occur geographically, and what new measures does the Commission intend to take in the short term in order to tackle them?
Katere nacionalne rešitve, ki so opredeljene v okviru izvajanja sistema ERTMS, ogrožajo interoperabilnost?
Which national solutions identified in the context of implementing the European Rail Traffic Management System jeopardise interoperability?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti uspešen prehod v sistem interoperabilnosti in izboljšati konkurenčnost sektorja?
How does the Commission intend to ensure a successful migration to the interoperability regime and improve the sector’s competitiveness?
Katera nova politična področja pravnega okvira železniškega sistema Skupnosti, vključno z Evropsko železniško agencijo, namerava Komisija pregledati in predlagati njihovo prenovitev ter kdaj namerava to storiti?
What policy areas of the Community railway legal framework, including the European Railway Agency, does it intend to revise, and when does it intend to propose a recast?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0130/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0130/09
Zadeva: Izgon afganistanskih prosilcev za azil
Subject: Expulsion of Afghan asylum-seekers
Trije afganistanski državljani iz Francije in 24 afganistanskih državljanov iz Združenega kraljestva je bilo 20. oktobra 2009 prisilno vrnjenih v Kabul z letalom, ki sta ga skupaj najela Francija in Združeno kraljestvo.
On 20 October 2009, three Afghan nationals were deported to Kabul from France, together with another 24 from the United Kingdom, on a plane chartered jointly by France and the UK.
Ali Komisija meni, da je Afganistan varna država?
Does the Commission regard Afghanistan as a safe country?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da let, če Afganistan ni varna država, pomeni kršitev člena 33 Ženevske konvencije o statusu beguncev, ki vsebuje načelo nevračanja?
Does the Commission agree that, if Afghanistan cannot be regarded as a safe country, the flight in question contravened Article 33 of the Geneva Convention relating to the status of refugees, which enshrines the principle that refugees may not be expelled or returned?
Ali Komisija meni, da pomeni skupni francosko-britanski let kolektivni izgon?
Does the Commission take the view that the joint flight arranged by France and the UK constituted collective expulsion?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je osnovni pogoj za organizacijo vsakega skupnega leta posamezna preučitev vsake prošnje za azil, upoštevajoč posebnosti posameznega primera?
Does the Commission agree that separate consideration of each individual application for asylum on its own merits is an essential prerequisite for the organisation of any such joint flight?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0131/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0131/09
, v imenu skupine S&D ,
, on behalf of the S&D Group,
Zadeva: Ratifikacija in izvajanje dopolnjenih konvencij Mednarodne organizacije dela
Subject: The ratification and implementation of the updated ILO conventions
Mednarodna organizacija dela je nedavno izvedla tristranski proces (v katerem so bili udeleženi delodajalci, delavci in vlade) ocenjevanja in dopolnjevanja svojih konvencij.
The International Labour Organization (ILO) has recently gone through a tripartite process – involving employers, workers and governments – of assessing and updating its conventions.
Rezultat tega procesa je seznam dopolnjenih konvencij Mednarodne organizacije dela.
This has resulted in a list of up-to-date ILO conventions.
Deklaracija Mednarodne organizacije dela o socialni pravičnosti za pravičnejšo globalizacijo iz leta 2008 in globalni pakt o zaposlovanju iz leta 2009, ki ju je soglasno sprejelo vseh 183 držav članic Mednarodne organizacije dela, v celoti pa jo je podprla tudi EU, pozivata k obnovitvi prizadevanj za ratifikacijo in uporabo konvencij.
The 2008 ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalisation and the 2009 Global Jobs Pact, both adopted on the basis of consensus among all 183 ILO member states and with the full support of the EU, call for renewed efforts on the ratification and application of conventions.
Vse države članice EU morajo ratificirati in uporabljati konvencije, ki jih ILO uvršča med aktualne.
All the EU Member States should ratify and apply the conventions classified by the ILO as being up to date.
Pomembno je, da EU jasno in dejavno prispeva k tem prizadevanjem, da bi pospešila verodostojen in skladen pristop med svojo notranjo in zunanjo politiko.
It is important that the EU explicitly and actively contribute to these efforts in order to foster a credible approach based on a coherent match between its internal and external policies.
V svoje sporočilo o prenovljeni socialni agendi (KOM(2008)0412) je Komisija vključila kratko sklicevanje na nadaljnje ukrepanje z izjavo: „Obenem Komisija poziva vse države članice, naj bodo za vzgled ter ratificirajo in izvajajo konvencije ILO, ki jih ILO uvršča med aktualne“.
In its Communication on the Renewed Social Agenda (COM(2008)0412), the Commission included a short reference to further action stating that ‘The Commission also calls upon all Member States to set an example by ratifying and implementing the ILO Conventions classified by ILO as up to date’.
Zakaj se je Komisija glede na izredni pomen tega vprašanja odločila uporabiti sporočilo, ki je najmanj ambiciozen ukrep, in ne priporočila državam članicam?
Given the paramount importance of the issue, why did the Commission decide to use the least ambitious measure – a communication – rather than a recommendation to the Member States?
Ali Komisija namerava tako priporočilo v bližnji prihodnosti pripraviti?
Would the Commission consider such a recommendation in the very near future?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0132/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0132/09
Zadeva: Nadzor nad nezakonito trgovino na zunanjih in notranjih mejah EU
Subject: Control of illegal trade across the EU's internal and external borders
Septembra je začel delovati forum Evropskega parlamenta za preprečevanje tihotapljenja, ponarejanja in organiziranega kriminala.
In September the European Parliament Forum for the Combat of Contraband, Counterfeit and Organised Crime was launched.
Forum je večstrankarsko telo, v katerem sodelujejo različne zainteresirane strani in si prizadeva opozoriti na to, da tihotapljenje, ponarejanje in organiziran kriminal ogrožajo zdravje, varnost in gospodarsko blagostanje evropskih državljanov, namen foruma pa je tudi podpreti delo Evropske komisije in evropskega observatorija za ponarejanje in piratstvo, ki je nedavno začel delovati.
The Forum is a cross-party, multi-stakeholder body that aims to draw attention to the threat that contraband, counterfeit and piracy pose to the health, security and economic well-being of Europe’s citizens and to support the work of the Commission and the recently-launched European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy.
Zasegi ponarejenega blaga na carini na zunanjih mejah EU kažejo, da je obseg pošiljk ponarejenega blaga vedno večji, kar resnično ogroža zdravje potrošnikov, saj ponarejeno blago vključuje zdravila, igrače, strojno in električno opremo ter hitro potujoče potrošniško blago.
Customs seizures of counterfeit goods at the EU's external borders show a continuing growth in the shipment of counterfeit goods which pose real health risks to consumers, such as medicines, toys, mechanical and electrical equipment and fast-moving consumer goods.
Nezakonita trgovina s trošarinskim blagom, kot sta alkohol in tobak, ki se vnaša v EU in se znotraj nje z njim trguje, je velika težava.
Illicit trade in excisable goods such as alcohol and tobacco into and within the EU constitutes a huge problem.
Podatki o obsegu tega pojava se razlikujejo po gospodarskih panogah.
Measurement of the scale varies with each business sector.
Vsa tovrstna trgovina vse bolj ogroža javno zdravje in delovna mesta poštenih državljanov, medtem ko države članice izgubijo milijarde EUR zaradi manjših davčnih prilivov.
All this trade represents a growing threat to public health, to jobs for honest citizens, and deprives Member States of billions of euros in lost tax revenue.
Kakšne konkretne ukrepe predlaga Svet za učinkovit nadzor nad nezakonito trgovino po vseh zunanjih in notranjih mejah EU?
What concrete steps does the Council propose to properly control illegal trade across the EU’s internal and external borders?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0133/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0133/09
Zadeva: Skupni čarterski leti za izgon nezakonitih priseljencev ali beguncev v države, kjer so vojne razmere
Subject: Joint charter flights to expel illegal immigrants and refugees to war-torn countries
Nedavno so države članice izvedle skupne prisilne izgone afganistanskih državljanov v Afganistan, kljub vojni, ki razsaja v številnih regijah te države, in morilskim atentatom, ki se redno izvajajo zlasti v Kabulu.
Some Member States have recently carried out joint forced returns of Afghan citizens to Afghanistan, in disregard of the state of war prevailing in many regions of the country and the terrorist attacks regularly committed there, particularly in Kabul.
Ali Svet ne meni, da je takšen izgon v nasprotju s členom 19 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in s členom 3 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic ter členom 4 njenega četrtega protokola?
Does the Council not regard such expulsions as being in breach of Article 19 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 4 of Protocol 4 to that Convention?
Če se Svet s to izjavo strinja, kakšno stališče namerava zavzeti glede držav članic, ki so izvedle oziroma nameravajo izvesti izgone v države, ki ogrožajo varnost, psihično integriteto ali življenje izgnanih ljudi?
If so, what action will the Council take with regard to Member States that have expelled, or might expel, persons to countries where their safety, physical integrity or lives are endangered?
Ali Svet ne meni, da ima vsak človek, ki se znajde v podobni situaciji, pravico do uporabe dodatne zaščite v skladu s členom 15(c) Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali apatridi, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite?
Does the Council not take the view that persons in such a situation should receive subsidiary protection in accordance with Article 15(c) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted?
Na zasedanju Evropskega sveta 29. in 30. oktobra 2009 so se voditelji držav in predsedniki vlad sporazumeli o preučitvi možnosti rednega zakupa skupnih letov za vračanje, financiranega iz sredstev agencije FRONTEX.
At the European Council meeting of 29-30 October 2009, the Heads of State and Government agreed to examine ‘the possibility of regular chartering financed by Frontex of joint return flights’.
Ali Svet ne meni, da takšna praksa krši člen 33 Ženevske konvencije in člen 3 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic, katere podpisnice so države članice?
Does the Council not regard such practices as being in violation of Article 33 of the Geneva Convention and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, to which the Member States are parties?
Ali Svet meni, da bodo ti leti redni in da to predstavlja močan preobrat politike EU na področju azila in priseljevanja?
Does the Council see these flights as a regular occurrence indicating a major shift in EU asylum and immigration policy?
Veliko število beguncev in prosilcev za azil, ki prihajajo iz Afganistana ali drugih držav v podobnih razmerah, ne vložijo prošnje, saj se bojijo, da bodo izgnani v državo članico, preko katere so vstopili v Evropsko unijo, kjer pa je stopnja dodelitve statusa azila zelo nizka.
Many refugees and asylum seekers from Afghanistan and other countries in similar situations refrain from applying for asylum for fear of being sent back to the Member State through which they entered the EU and in which asylum is granted to only a very small proportion of applicants.
Ali je Svet izvedel oceno izgonov prosilcev za azil v prvo državo članico vstopa in dodeljevanja statusa azila v zadevnih državah članicah?
Has the Council conducted studies of the numbers of asylum seekers sent back to the first Member State they entered and the numbers who, in these circumstances, are then granted asylum in each Member State?
Ali namerava Svet v kratkem podpreti revizijo Uredbe (ES) št. 343/2003 , običajno imenovano Uredba Dublin II?
Does the Council intend to advocate a review of Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 , known as the Dublin II Regulation, in the near future?
UL L 50, 25.2.2003, str.
OJ L 50, 25.02.03, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0134/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0134/09
Ali Komisija ne meni, da je takšen izgon v nasprotju s členom 19 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in s členom 3 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic ter členom 4 njenega četrtega protokola?
Does the Commission not regard such expulsions as being in breach of Article 19 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 4 of Protocol 4 to that Convention?
Če se Komisija s to izjavo strinja, kakšno stališče namerava zavzeti glede držav članic, ki so izvedle oziroma nameravajo izvesti izgone v države, ki predstavljajo nevarnost za psihično integriteto ali življenje izgnanih ljudi?
If so, what action will the Commission take with regard to Member States that have expelled, or might expel, persons to countries where they are at risk of physical harm or death?
Ali Komisija ne meni, da ima vsak človek, ki se znajde v podobni situaciji, pravico do uporabe dodatne zaščite v skladu s členom 15(c) Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali apatridi, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite?
Does the Commission not take the view that persons in such a situation should receive subsidiary protection in accordance with Article 15(c) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted?
Komisija je bila pozvana, da s tem v zvezi vloži predloge do začetka leta 2010.
The Council invited the Commission to present proposals to that end by early 2010.
Kako se namerava Komisija odzvati na te predloge?
What does the Commission intend to propose?
Ali meni, da bodo ti leti redni in da to predstavlja močan preobrat politike EU na področju azila in priseljevanja?
Does the Commission see these flights as a regular occurrence indicating a major shift in EU asylum and immigration policy?
Veliko število beguncev in prosilcev za azil, ki prihajajo iz Afganistana ali drugih držav v podobnih razmerah, ne vložijo prošnje, saj se bojijo, da bodo izgnani v državo članico, preko katere so vstopili v Evropsko unijo, kjer pa je stopnja dodelitve statusa azila zelo nizka.
Many refugees and asylum seekers from Afghanistan and other countries in similar situations refrain from applying for asylum for fear of being sent back to the Member States through which they entered the EU and in which asylum is granted to only a very small proportion of applicants.
Ali je Komisija izvedla oceno izgonov prosilcev za azil v prvo državo članico vstopa in dodeljevanja statusa azila v zadevnih državah članicah?
Has the Commission conducted studies of the numbers of asylum seekers sent back to the first Member State they entered and the numbers who, in these circumstances, are then granted asylum in each Member State?
Ali je Komisija sprožila postopke proti državam članicam zaradi kršitve določb te uredbe na področju prošenj za azil in nezakonitega izgona proti prvi državi članici vstopa?
Has the Commission begun proceedings against any Member State for infringement of the provisions of the regulation referred to above in connection with asylum applications and illegal expulsions to the Member State through which they entered the EU?
Ali namerava Komisija v kratkem predlagati revizijo Uredbe (ES) št. 343/2003 , običajno imenovano Uredba Dublin II?
Does the Commission intend to propose a review of Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 , known as the Dublin II Regulation, in the near future?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0135/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0135/09
Zadeva: Omejevalni ukrepi
Subject: Restrictive measures