natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, kakšne ukrepe namerava uvesti za večjo dostopnost programa NAIADES v obdobju 2011–2013 in kakšne ukrepe je predvidela za izboljšave in podaljšanje tega programa po letu 2013, glede na prihodnjo vmesno oceno izvajanja tega programa in dejstvo, da se vse države članice s celinskimi plovnimi potmi niso mogle uspešno vključiti vanj?
In view of the forthcoming mid-term evaluation of the NAIADES Programme, and bearing in mind that not all Member States with inland waterways have managed to access that programme, can the Commission state how it plans to increase the accessibility of the NAIADES Programme in the period 2011-2013, to improve it and to extend it after 2013?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0627/2010
Question for Question Time H-0627/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Strategija 2010-2015 za enakost med ženskami in moškimi
(PPE) Subject: 2010-2015 gender equality strategy
21. septembra letos je Komisija predstavila strategijo za enakost med ženskami in moškimi za obdobje 2010–2015.
On 21 September 2010 the Commission unveiled the gender equality strategy for the years 2010 to 2015.
V mnenju o prihodnosti politike za enakost med spoloma po letu 2010 (" Opinion on the Future of Gender Equality Policy after 2010 ") je navedeno, da v proračunu EU in v nacionalnih proračunih ni posebnih postavk za dejavnosti za enakost med spoloma, ter ugotavlja, da je to pomembna kritična točka za doseganje ciljev strategije.
According to the opinion on ‘The Future of Gender Equality Policy after 2015’, the fact that there are no specific headings, either in the EU budget or in national budgets, for gender equality activities is making the strategy’s aims considerably more difficult to achieve.
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kako bo ustrezno ukrepala?
What does the Commission think should be done?
V večini držav članic so pri postopkih odločanja in na vodilnih položajih ženske slabo zastopane.
In most Member States women are still underrepresented in decision-making processes and positions.
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bi se povečala prisotnost žensk na vodilnih položajih?
What steps will the Commission take to enable more women to rise to decision-making positions?
Ali se trenutno preučujejo konkretne pobude za spodbujanje teme o enakosti med spoloma med mladimi generacijami?
Are any initiatives currently being considered with a view to championing the cause of gender equality in the eyes of the younger generation?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi morala predlagati posebno financiranje tovrstnih pobud, na primer v evropskih izobraževalnih programih ali prek uporabe novih tehnologij?
Does the Commission believe that funding should be proposed for specific actions to that end, to be implemented under European training programmes, for example, or with the aid of new technology applications?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0628/2010
Question for Question Time H-0628/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Zaprtje tovarne za predelavo sladkorne pese v sladkor v kraju Mallow, Co.
(PPE) Subject: Closure of sugar beet plant in Mallow, Co.
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0629/2010
Question for Question Time H-0629/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Uporaba evropskih sredstev
(PPE) Subject: Utilisation of European funds
Na podlagi članka, ki je bil nedavno objavljen v časniku Financial Times, je Evropska unija porabila le 10 % od 347 milijard EUR, ki so do leta 2013 na voljo za spodbujanje razvoja v revnih regijah.
According to a recent article in the Financial Times , the European Union has only spent 10% of the 347 billion euros allocated for the period up to 2013 to promote the development of poor regions.
V istem članku je navedeno, da sredstva, namenjena podpori malim in srednjim podjetjem, na koncu črpajo multinacionalke (Coca-Cola, IBM, Nokia, Siemens), medtem ko druga velika podjetja (Twinings, Valeo) sredstva Unije uporabljajo za selitev svojih dejavnosti v države s cenejšo delovno silo kljub pravilom, ki to izrecno prepovedujejo.
That article also states that funding earmarked for SMEs has come to be used by multinational companies (Coca-Cola, IBM, Nokia Siemens) while other large companies (Twining, Valeo) are using EU funds to transfer their operations to countries where labour is cheaper, thereby violating rules explicitly prohibiting that practice.
Kakšno je stališče Komisije do informacij iz tega članka in kakšne morebitne rešitve predlaga, da v prihodnje ne bi več prišlo do takšnih razmer?
What is the Commission’s view of the information contained in that article, and what steps is it considering taking to prevent such situations arising in the future?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0630/2010
Question for Question Time H-0630/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Izvajanje evropskega mikrofinančnega instrumenta Progress v državah članicah Evropske unije
(S&D) Subject: Implementation of the European 'Progress' Microfinance Facility in EU Member States
Z evropskim mikrofinančnim instrumentom Progress, ki ga je oblikovala Komisija, naj bi osebam, ki želijo ustanoviti ali razviti svoje podjetje in imajo težave pri pridobitvi bančnega posojila, olajšali dostop do financiranja (do 25.000 EUR).
The European ‘Progress’ Microfinance Facility, established by the Commission, is intended to facilitate access to financing (up to € 25 000) for people wishing to set up or develop a business who encounter difficulties in obtaining bank loans.
Javne in zasebne mikrofinančne institucije držav članic, ki želijo pridobiti jamstvo, lahko svoje zahtevke naslovijo na Evropski investicijski sklad, ki za Komisijo upravlja mikrofinančni instrument Progress.
Public and private microfinance institutions in the Member States which wish to obtain guarantees can apply to the European Investment Fund (EIF), which is managing the European ‘Progress’ Microfinance Facility on behalf of the Commission.
Ali ima Svet na voljo podatke o tem, kako države članice izvajajo ta ukrep, in ali lahko pove, ali lahko zainteresirane osebe pridobijo tovrstna finančna sredstva?
Does the Council have any information about the way in which this measure is being implemented in the Member States and can it indicate whether people who would be interested can obtain such financing?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0631/2010
Question for Question Time H-0631/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Dodelitev finančne podpore EU kitajskim državnim gradbenim koncernom
(PPE) Subject: Award of EU subsidies to Chinese state-owned construction companies
Naročilo za izgradnjo odseka avtoceste je poljski generalni direktorat za nacionalne ceste in avtoceste dodelil konzorciju „COVEC“, ki ga sestavljajo kitajski državni gradbeni koncerni.
The contract to construct this stretch of motorway was awarded by the Polish General Directorate for National Roads and Highways to a consortium of Chinese state-owned construction companies under the name COVEC.
V primerjavi z evropskimi gradbenimi podjetji so bile ponudbene cene kitajskega ponudnika za več kot polovico nižje od stroškov, ki jih je ocenil organ, pristojen za javna naročila, ter za eno tretjino nižje od drugega najcenejšega ponudnika.
In competing with European construction firms, the Chinese tenderer’s bids were less than half the cost estimated for the project by the competent authority and undercut their nearest competitor by one third.
Nasprotno ostaja kitajski trg zaprt za skoraj vsakršno tujo konkurenco v gradbenem sektorju.
In contrast, the Chinese market is closed to virtually all foreign competition in the construction industry.
Ali Komisija na podlagi navedenega ugotavlja, da gre v odnosu med EU in Kitajsko za bistveno kršitev mednarodnega načela vzajemnosti, ki je bistvena podlaga pogajanj o mednarodnih trgovinskih odnosih?
In the light of this situation, does the Commission consider that the international principle of reciprocity that forms a key negotiating basis for international trade relations is being infringed on a huge scale in the EU's relationship with China?
Katere ukrepe namerava v zvezi s tem sprejeti Komisija, da bi preprečila sedanji trend?
What action does the Commission intend to take in order to counter this trend?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0632/2010
Question for Question Time H-0632/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Obalna erozija
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Coastal erosion
Obalna erozija je pojav ki ogroža obsežna območja portugalske obale od severa do juga države.
Coastal erosion is increasingly threatening large areas of the Portuguese coast, from north to south.
Če ga ne bodo obvladali in obrnili v nasprotno smer, bi lahko v prihodnje povzročil zelo veliko škode in imel močne posledice z gospodarskega, socialnega in okoljskega vidika.
Unless it is contained and reversed, it could provoke considerable future damage and could have major economic, social and environmental repercussions.
Kateri ukrepi se izvajajo na ravni EU za rešitev problema obalne erozije?
What measures have been implemented at EU level to tackle this problem of coastal erosion?
Kako bo Komisija obalno erozijo vključila v pristop Unije za preprečevanje naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek?
How will the Commission integrate coastal erosion into the Community approach to the prevention of disasters of natural and human origin?
Kakšne pobude se pripravljajo?
What initiatives are being developed?
Kateri instrumenti za podporo državam članicam, ki jih najbolj ogrožajo posledice obalne erozije, so na voljo?
What support instruments are available to the Member States most vulnerable to the effects of coastal erosion?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0633/2010
Question for Question Time H-0633/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Letalske družbe ne upoštevajo uredbe (ES) št. 261/2004 o varstvu in obveščanju letalskih potnikov
(S&D) Subject: Airlines' non-compliance with Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 with regard to protection and information for passengers
Leta 2005 se je začela uporabljati uredba (ES) št. 261/2004, katere glavni namen sta varstvo in obveščanje letalskih potnikov.
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 came into force as long ago as 2005, with the key aim of ensuring that airline passengers were protected and properly informed.
Komisija je sama začela kampanje ozaveščanja, medtem ko letalske družbe neprestano kršijo to uredbo, zaradi česar potniki ostajajo brez hitrih in učinkovitih pravnih sredstev.
The Commission has run its own awareness-raising campaigns on the subject, yet airlines repeatedly violate the regulation, leaving passengers without swift and effective remedies.
Poleg tega je rezervacija vozovnic prek interneta postala goljufija: vozovnica od Bruslja do Strasbourga pri rednem prevozniku z močno oglaševano ceno 98 EUR na koncu stane 219,60 EUR, in vključuje celo dodatek, ki se imenuje „fuel fee“.
Meanwhile, online booking has turned into a racket: a ticket from Brussels to Strasbourg with an ordinary carrier, advertised and heavily promoted at the price of EUR 98, ends up costing a total of EUR 219.60, including something called a ‘fuel fee’!
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kdaj in kako namerava zagotoviti, da bodo države članice uporabljale uredbo (ES) št. 261/2004, in od njih zahtevati uvedbo hitrih in učinkovitih mehanizmov za nadomestila?
Can the Commission indicate when and how it intends to ensure that the Member States apply Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 and to require them to introduce arrangements for rapid and effective compensation?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0635/2010
Question for Question Time H-0635/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Potreba po nujni pomoči na Haitiju
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Need to provide emergency aid for Haiti
Januarja 2010 je potres, ki je razdejal Haiti, zahteval na tisoče žrtev, ekonomske in socialne razmere, ki prevladujejo v državi, ki je bila že pred potresom med najrevnejšimi državami na svetu, pa so postale neznosne.
The catastrophic earthquake which struck Haiti in January 2010 cost thousands of lives and left an unbearable economic and social situation in the country, which was one of the poorest in the world even before the earthquake.
Po poročanju humanitarnih organizacij več mesecev po potresu trupla še vedno niso bila odstranjena iz ruševin, higienske razmere prebivalcev so ostale zelo slabe in pomanjkanje humanitarne pomoči je več kot očitno.
Humanitarian organisations report that, several months after the earthquake, bodies had not been pulled out of the ruins, the sanitary conditions of the population were appalling and humanitarian aid conspicuous by its absence.
Izbruh epidemije kolere je bilo torej mogoče predvideti.
A cholera epidemic was the logical outcome.
Dolg seznam žrtev potresa se z na tisoče potrjenimi žrtvami nenehno podaljšuje.
The thousands of confirmed victims are adding to the ever-lengthening list of those killed in the earthquake.
Na podlagi podatkov Združenih narodov (OCHA) je kot ponavadi velik razkorak med „obljubami“ o pomoči in njihovo uresničitvijo.
According to UN (OCHA) information, there is, as usual, a great discrepancy between the aid 'promised' and the aid actually delivered.
Ali lahko Svet odgovori na naslednji vprašanji: Kakšne zneske je Evropska unija obljubila Haitiju in kakšne zneske je ta država prejela do danes?
How much has the EU promised to send to Haiti and how much has it actually delivered to date?
Kako si namerava predsedstvo Sveta nadalje prizadevati za pomoč milijonom oseb, ki bodo brez pomoči kmalu umrli?
What further efforts does the Presidency of the Council intend to make in order to help the millions of people who continue to die in Haiti without aid?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0636/2010
Question for Question Time H-0636/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Dodatni ukrepi za pomoč malim in srednjim podjetjem pri izvajanju turistične politike
(S&D) Subject: Additional support measures for SMEs under tourism policy
Turizem je tako kot katera koli druga gospodarska panoga čedalje bolj izpostavljen svetovni konkurenci.
Tourism, like any other sector of the economy, is increasingly feeling the effects of world competition.
Da bi ostala konkurenčna na področju turizma, je Evropska unija v Lizbonski pogodbi določila cilj spodbujanja konkurenčnosti na tem področju in vzpostavitve primernega okolja za razvoj podjetij.
In order for the European Union to remain competitive in this sector, the EU has set itself the objective in the Lisbon Treaty of promoting the competitiveness of tourism and creating an environment favourable to business development.
Za to so predvideni naslednji cilji: spodbujati inovacije v turizmu, izboljšati kakovost vseh turističnih storitev, izpopolniti strokovno znanje osebja.
For this purpose the following objectives have been adopted: promoting innovation in tourism, improving the overall quality of tourism services and perfecting the professional skills of personnel.
Vendar podjetja v turizmu (večinoma gre za mala in srednja podjetja) ne zmorejo vedno sama uresničiti teh ciljev.
However, businesses in the tourism sector – many of which are SMEs – are not always able to attain these objectives through their own unaided efforts.
Na to vpliva več dejavnikov: omejeni finančni viri, pomanjkanje usposobljenih delavcev in nezmožnost za hitro odzivanje na spremembe, za kar so potrebna dodatna finančna sredstva.
This is due to several factors, such as limited financial resources, the lack of qualified workers and inability to respond quickly to change: hence the need for additional funding.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi bilo primerno pripraviti usklajeno strategijo in podroben akcijski načrt z ukrepi za posebno pomoč malim in srednjim podjetjem in mehanizmi za financiranje, ki bi lahko pripomogli k premostitvi težav v turizmu?
Does not the Commission consider that it would be desirable to devise a coherent strategy and a detailed action plan comprising specific support measures for SMEs and financing arrangements which could help to overcome the difficulties encountered by the sector?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0637/2010
Question for Question Time H-0637/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Višje cene vozovnic v javnem prevozu
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Increased fares on public transport
V memorandumu o soglasju med Grčijo, Evropsko unijo in Mednarodnim denarnim skladom so izrecno omenjene „višje cene vozovnic“ v javnem prevozu.
The Memorandum of Understanding between Greece, the EU and the IMF specifically refers to increased fares on public transport.
Na podlagi informacij iz medijev bodo cene vozovnic višje za 30 do 50 %.
According to press reports, the increase in fares will be between 30 and 50%.
Ker naj bi Komisija spodbujala uporabo javnih prevoznih sredstev in ker naj bi vsa povišanja cen vozovnic imela resne ekonomske posledice za najrevnejše sloje prebivalstva, Komisijo prosim za odgovore na naslednja vprašanja:
Given that the Commission is supposed to encourage the use of public transport and that the financial burden caused by an increase in fare prices will have a significant economic impact on disadvantaged sections of the population, will it say:
Ali potrjuje obseg teh povišanj v javnem prevozu, ki jih bo težko sprejeti?
Can it confirm such excessive increases in fares on public transport, particularly urban transport?
Ali meni, da je treba k množičnim povišanjem neposrednih in posrednih dajatev dodati še ta ukrep, ki bo najbolj prizadel najšibkejše sloje?
Does it consider it necessary to add such a measure, which will mainly affect the disadvantaged sections of the population, to the huge increase in direct and indirect taxes?
Ali je po njenem mnenju ta ukrep skladen s politikami Evropske unije, ki naj bi spodbujale uporabo javnega prevoza kot varčnejšega in okolju prijaznejšega prevoza?
Does it believe that this measure is consistent with EU policies which are supposed to encourage public transport as a cheaper and more environmentally-friendly means of transport?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0638/2010
Question for Question Time H-0638/2010
(NI) Zadeva: Potreba po oblikovanju odločnega stališča EU do tretjih držav, ki ovirajo vračanje zavrnjenih prosilcev za azil ter s tem poglabljajo grško krizo na področju azila
(NI) Subject: Need for a firm attitude by the EU to third countries which prevent the return of deported asylum seekers and thus contribute to the Greek asylum crisis
EU se bori z nezakonitim priseljevanjem, toda pred kratkim so se številne države odločile, da zavrnjenih prosilcev za azil kljub „dublinskemu pravilu“ ne bodo vračale v Grčijo.
The EU is battling with the problem of illegal foreign residents, but recently a number of countries have decided to stop returning deported asylum seekers to Greece, in spite of the EU’s Dublin Rule.
Odbor LIBE je na nedavnem obisku odkril enega od razlogov za to, in sicer kaže, da alžirsko, maroško, turško, tunizijsko in pakistansko veleposlaništvo dokumentov za vračanje ne priskrbijo v primernem roku, zaradi česar narašča število nezakonitih priseljencev v Grčiji.
A recent visit to Greece by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs revealed that one of the reasons is that the embassies of Algeria, Morocco, Turkey, Tunisia and Pakistan are refusing to issue repatriation documents within a reasonable time, which means that the number of illegals in Greece continues to rise.
Ali bo Komisija turški mejni nadzor in hitro sprejetje sporazuma s Frontexom vključila v svojo oceno o instrumentu predpristopne pomoči Turčiji?
Is the Commission prepared to take Turkish border policing and the speedy conclusion of an agreement with Frontex into account in its evaluation of International Project Aid to Turkey?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0639/2010
Question for Question Time H-0639/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Evropski mikrofinančni instrument Progress
(S&D) Subject: European Progress Microfinance Facility
Izvajanje evropskega mikrofinančnega instrumenta Progress poteka počasneje, kot je bilo pričakovati, kar bi lahko ogrozilo njegov namen in kar je nedvomno v nasprotju s hitrostjo njegovega sprejetja v marcu 2010.
Implementation of the European Progress Microfinance Facility (EPMF) seems to be slower than expected, a situation which could endanger its purpose and which is manifestly at odds with the speed of its adoption in March 2010.
Kako namerava Komisija pospešiti proces in zagotoviti, da bo evropski mikrofinančni instrument Progress dosegel najbolj ranljive skupine ljudi in hkrati odražal ustrezno geografsko ravnovesje?
How does the Commission intend to speed up the process and make sure that the EPMF reaches the most vulnerable people while also reflecting the right geographical balance?
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti, da bi pridobila države članice za financiranje programov mentorstva in usposabljanja ter, da bi zagotovila subvencioniranje plačila obresti iz evropskega socialnega sklada, kot je bilo dogovorjeno?
What does the Commission plan to do in order to get the Member States to finance mentoring and training programmes, and also to ensure that interest payments are subsidised from European Social Fund resources, as agreed?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo informacije o evropskem mikrofinančnem instrumentu Progress dosegle ciljne skupine?
How will the Commission ensure that information about the EPMF reaches the target audiences?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0640/2010
Question for Question Time H-0640/2010
Obalna erozija je pojav, ki ogroža obsežna območja portugalske obale od severa do juga države.
Coastal erosion threatens extensive stretches of the Portuguese coast from north to south.
Zaradi različnih vzrokov, med katere lahko štejemo zvišanje povprečne višine gladine morja, zmanjšanje količine usedlin na obali, poslabšanje naravnih struktur zaradi človekovega delovanja in različne posege v obalnem pasu, ta pojav ogroža varnost oseb in premoženja v številnih regijah in je že povzročil hude nesreče.
For various reasons, including the rise in sea levels, the fall in the amount of sediment reaching the coast, anthropogenic degradation of natural structures and a whole range of interventions affecting the coastal strip, erosion is threatening the safety of persons and property in various regions, and has already led to serious accidents.
Če ga ne bodo obvladali in obrnili v nasprotno smer, bi lahko v prihodnje povzročil zelo veliko škode in imel močne posledice z gospodarskega, socialnega in okoljskega vidika.
If the process is not contained and reversed, it could involve extremely significant prejudice in the future and have a major impact in economic, social and environmental terms.
Katere pobude bo Svet prevzel za reševanje problema obalne erozije?
What initiatives is the Council going to take to combat the problem of coastal erosion?
Kako bo obalno erozijo vključil v pristop Unije za preprečevanje naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek?
How is it going to integrate coastal erosion into the Community approach to natural and man-made disasters?
Katere instrumente za pomoč državam članicam, ki jih najbolj ogrožajo posledice obalne erozije, je po njegovem mnenju treba vzpostaviti?
What instruments does it intend to devise to support those Member States most vulnerable to the effects of coastal erosion?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0641/2010
Question for Question Time H-0641/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Dodelitev finančne podpore EU kitajskim državnim gradbenim koncernom
(PPE) Subject: EU funding for Chinese State-owned construction firms
Na Poljskem je sedaj v gradnji odsek avtoceste A2 od Varšave do Lodža v skupni dolžini 50 km.
A 50 km section of the A2 motorway between Warsaw and Lodz is currently being built in Poland.
Izgradnja odseka se financira z evropsko finančno podporo (strukturni skladi EU) ter s pomočjo posojila EIB.
Funding for this project is being provided through the EU’s Structural Funds and a loan from the EIB.
Naročilo za izgradnjo tega odseka avtoceste je poljski generalni direktorat za nacionalne ceste in avtoceste dodelil konzorciju „COVEC“, ki ga sestavljajo kitajski državni gradbeni koncerni.
Poland’s Department for National Roads and Motorways awarded the contract to build this motorway section to a consortium of Chinese State-owned construction firms known collectively as ‘COVEC’.