natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V skupnem poročilu iz leta 2010 je bilo jasno zapisano, da bi morale države članice sprejeti celovite strategije za brezdomstvo, ki bi bile usmerjene v ključne cilje, kot so preprečevanje in skrajšanje trajanja brezdomstva, s poudarkom na njegovih najtežjih oblikah ter izboljšanjem kakovosti storitev in ponudbe dostopnih stanovanj za brezdomce.
The 2010 Joint Report made it clear that the Member States should adopt integrated homelessness strategies focusing on key targets such as the prevention of homelessness and a reduction in its duration, targeting the most severe homelessness, improving the quality of services for homeless people and the supply of affordable housing.
Evropska konferenca o soglasju na področju brezdomstva iz leta 2010 je pozvala k vseobsegajoči strategiji EU za brezdomstvo v podporo razvoju, spremljanju in usklajevanju politik za brezdomstvo v državah članicah.
The 2010 European Consensus Conference on Homelessness called for an overarching EU Homelessness Strategy to support, monitor and coordinate the development of homelessness policies in the Member States.
Evropska platforma proti revščini in socialni izključenosti se zavzema za nadaljevanje dela Komisije glede brezdomstva, in sicer z upoštevanjem zaključkov konference o soglasju.
The European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion (EPPSE) is committed to continuing the Commission’s work on homelessness, taking into account the outcomes of the Consensus Conference.
V kateri fazi je Komisija glede razvoja strategije EU za brezdomstvo znotraj okvira Evropske platforme proti revščini in socialni izključenosti?
What stage has the Commission reached in the development of an EU homelessness strategy within the framework of EPPSE?
Katere so po mnenju Komisije glavne sestavine take strategije in kako namerava upoštevati priporočila porote Evropske konference o soglasju na področju brezdomstva?
What does the Commission consider to be the central components of such a strategy, and how will it take into account the recommendations of the jury of the European Consensus Conference on Homelessness?
Kakšni so načrti Komisije glede sodelovanja z Evropskim parlamentom pri pripravi strategije EU za brezdomstvo?
How does the Commission envisage cooperation with the European Parliament on developing an EU homelessness strategy?
Ali Komisija razmišlja o pripravi osnutka sporočila o brezdomstvu in, če je odgovor pritrdilen, kdaj ga lahko pričakujemo?
Is the Commission considering drafting a communication on homelessness, and when?
Če o tem ne razmišlja, ali lahko pojasni, zakaj ne?
If not, why not?
Kako namerava Komisija v okviru Unije inovacij in Evropske platforme proti revščini in socialni izključenosti podpreti poskuse zbiranja nadaljnjih dokazov o učinkovitih rešitvah za brezdomstvo in kako bo podprla razširjanje in nadaljnji razvoj teh rešitev?
In the framework of the Innovation Union and the European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion, how will the Commission support experimentation to gather further evidence on effective solutions for homelessness, and how will it support the dissemination and scaling-up of these solutions?
Pisna izjava št. 61/2010 določa 5 ključnih prednostnih nalog, ki jih je treba obravnavati, če želimo odpraviti brezdomstvo.
Written Declaration 61/2010 identified 5 key priorities that need to be addressed in order to bring an end to homelessness.
Kako bo Komisija omogočila napredek pri uresničevanju teh ciljev v državah članicah?
How will the Commission facilitate progress towards these goals in the Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000154/2011
Question for oral answer O-000154/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Krepitev protikorupcijskih ukrepov
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Stepping up anti-corruption measures
Komisija je 6. junija 2011 sprejela protikorupcijski zakonodajni sveženj, ki vsebuje sporočilo o boju proti korupciji v EU, sklep o uvedbi mehanizma poročanja EU o boju proti korupciji, poročilo o izvajanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2003/568/PNZ o boju proti korupciji v zasebnem sektorju in poročilo o načinih sodelovanja Evropske unije v Skupini držav proti korupciji (GRECO) pri Svetu Evrope.
On 6 June 2011 the Commission adopted an anti-corruption package which includes a communication on fighting corruption in the EU, a decision establishing an EU anti-corruption reporting mechanism, a report on the implementation of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA on combating corruption in the private sector, and a report on the modalities of EU participation in the Council of Europe Group of States against Corruption (GRECO).
Glede na resne škodljive posledice korupcije za finančne vire držav članic, ekonomsko integriteto trgov in zaupanje državljanov v svojo vlado, je treba nujno ukrepati.
There is a great sense of urgency, given the serious corrosive impact of corruption on Member States’ financial resources, the economic integrity of the markets and the trust of citizens in their governments.
Ali bo Svet sodeloval s Komisijo pri sprejetju osnutka sklepov, v katerih bo izrazil trdno politično zavezanost k boju proti korupciji, saj nekatere države članice trenutno niso pripravljene na to?
Will the Council cooperate with the Commission to adopt draft conclusions stating its firm political commitment to battle corruption, some Member States currently lacking the will to do so?
Ali bo Svet pozval države članice, ki še niso ratificirale nekaterih mednarodnih instrumentov za boj proti korupciji, naj to storijo?
Will the Council urge those Member States who have not yet done so to ratify the remaining international anti-corruption instruments?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000155/2011
Question for oral answer O-000155/2011
Glede na resne škodljive posledice, ki jih ima korupcija za finančne vire držav članic, ekonomsko integriteto trgov in zaupanje državljanov v vlado, je potrebno nujno ukrepanje.
There is a great sense of urgency, given the serious corrosive impact of corruption on Member States' financial resources, the economic integrity of the markets and the trust of citizens in their governments.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je boj proti korupciji izjemnega pomena za države članice EU in da je zato treba prvo poročilo EU o preprečevanju korupcije sprejeti že leta 2012 in ne 2013?
Accordingly, does the Commission agree that such urgency demands much swifter adoption of a first EU Anti-Corruption Report, bringing it forward to 2012 instead of 2013?
Poročilo jasno navaja, da v državah članicah primanjkuje politične volje za boj proti korupciji.
The communication clearly states that there is a lack of political will among Member States to fight corruption.
Nekatere države članice še vedno niso podpisale Konvencije ZN proti korupciji in drugih pravno zavezujočih instrumentov za boj proti korupciji.
There are even some EU Member States which have not signed the UN Convention against Corruption and other legally binding international anti-corruption instruments.
Ali je Komisija pripravljena Svetu predložiti osnutek sklepov, v katerih bi izrazila politično voljo, da bi boj proti korupciji postal prednostna naloga Sveta, in države članice pozvala k ratifikaciji preostalih mednarodnih instrumentov, če tega še niso storile?
Is the Commission prepared to submit to the Council draft conclusions expressing the political will to make the fight against corruption a top priority for the Council, and urging Member States which have not yet done so to ratify the remaining international instruments forthwith?
Nekatere države članice EU, kot so Grčija, Portugalska in Irska, se soočajo z resnimi težavami in s hudimi pritiski za zmanjšanje stroškov ter privatizacijo javnih dobrin in storitev, predvsem v zvezi z zagotavljanjem finančne pomoči IMF in EU.
There are some EU Member States with urgent problems, such as Greece, Portugal and Ireland, which, especially in view of the IMF and EU financial support, have come under extreme pressure to cut back costs and privatise public goods and services.
Pri teh procesih korupcija zagotovo ne bo pripomogla k odpravljanju težav in jo je treba preprečiti.
Corruption during these processes will certainly not help mitigate any problems and needs to be countered.
Namen Komisije, da obnovi mrežo kontaktnih točk EU za boj proti korupciji (EACN) je dobrodošel.
The Commission’s intention to revitalise the EU contact-point network against corruption (EACN) is welcome.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi takšna mreža lahko imela pomembno vlogo pri pomoči državam, ki se srečujejo z resnimi izzivi na področju korupcije?
Does the Commission agree that this network can play a vital role in helping countries which are facing serious challenges with regard to corruption?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena s pomočjo te mreže vzpostaviti mobilne enote za države, kot je Grčija, ki se soočajo z resno dolžniško krizo in imajo težave pri pobiranju davkov?
Is the Commission prepared to set up ‘flying squads’, with the help of the network, ‘for countries such as Greece which are facing a serious debt crisis and have tax collection problems?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000156/2011
Question for oral answer O-000156/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Stanje pogajanj z Avstralijo, ZDA in Kanado o uporabi in prenosu podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR)
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: State of play regarding the negotiations with Australia, the US and Canada on the use and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data
Ali lahko Komisija podrobno pojasni svojo oceno o skladnosti sporazuma med EU in Avstralijo o prenosu podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih s temeljnimi pravicami in zakonodajo EU, pa tudi z merili iz resolucij Evropskega parlamenta P7_TA(2010)0144 in P7_TA(2010)0397 ?
Can the Commission clarify in detail its assessment of the conformity of the EU-Australia agreement on PNR with fundamental rights and EU legislation, as well as with the criteria set out in European Parliament resolutions P7_TA(2010)0144 and P7_TA(2010)0397 ?
Ali lahko zlasti pojasni, kako je ugotovila, da sta zbiranje in uporaba podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih v skladu z zakonskimi zahtevami o nujnosti in sorazmernosti?
Can the Commission explain in particular how it has established that the collection and use of PNR meets the legal requirements of necessity and proportionality?
Ali lahko pojasni, kako namerava v okviru člena 218 PDEU izvajati člena 23 in 25 sporazuma med EU in Avstralijo (o reševanju sporov, začasni prekinitvi in prenehanju), če Evropski parlament z absolutno večino pozove k uporabi teh členov?
Can the Commission clarify how, in the context of Article 218 TFEU, it intends to implement Articles 23 and 25 of the EU-Australia agreement (on dispute resolution, suspension and termination) in the event that the European Parliament, voting with an absolute majority, calls for the application of those articles?
Glede na to, da avstralska zakonodaja od prevoznikov zahteva, naj prenesejo PNR, je namen sporazuma med EU in Avstralijo izključno zagotoviti, da prenos teh podatkov poteka v skladu z zakonodajo EU o varstvu podatkov.
Given that the transfer of PNR by carriers is a requirement of Australian law, the purpose of the EU-Australia agreement is exclusively to ensure that data transfer takes place in conformity with EU data protection law.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je člen 16 PDEU ustrezna pravna podlaga za sklep Sveta?
Does the Commission agree that Article 16 TFEU is an adequate legal basis for the Council decision?
Ali bi bila Komisija pripravljena preučiti možnost takšne opredelitve glede na dejstvo, da bi enotno dogovorjene opredelitve profiliranja, ki bi tudi temeljile na veljavnih mednarodnih dokumentih, lahko pomagale pri ocenjevanju povezav med zbiranjem in obdelavo podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih ter dejavnostmi profiliranja?
Given that a uniform agreed definition of profiling, also based on international documents in force, could help in assessing the links between the collection and processing of PNR data and profiling activities, would the Commission agree to work on such a definition?
Ali lahko Komisija do izida nadaljnjih pogajanj z ZDA in Kanado zagotovi informacije o splošnih merilih, da se zagotovi spoštovanje načela nujnosti in sorazmernosti, zlasti glede obsega in obdobja hrambe podatkov?
Pending the outcome of further negotiations with the US and Canada, can the Commission provide information about general criteria to ensure respect for the principles of necessity and proportionality, particularly regarding the scope and retention periods?
Ali lahko predstavi popoln pregled morebitnih dvostranskih sporazumov med ZDA in državami članicami, v katerih je omenjen prenos podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih?
Can it give a full overview of possible bilateral agreements between the US and Member States containing a reference to the transfer of PNR?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni prihodnjo zakonodajo, ki predvideva sistematičen prenos PNR iz Kanade v ZDA?
Can the Commission clarify the forthcoming legislation that makes provision for the systematic transfer of PNR from Canada to the US?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni povezavo med ameriškim programom Secure Flight in zbiranjem podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih?
Can the Commission clarify the relationship between the US Secure Flight programme and the collection of PNR data?
Ali Komisija meni, da je pogostost ad hoc uporabe metode „pull“ pridobivanja podatkov ameriških oblasti iz sistemov prevoznikov, ki že uporabljajo metodo „push“, v skladu z določbami obstoječega sporazuma z ZDA?
Does the Commission consider the frequency of ad hoc PULLs by the US authorities from the systems of carriers that are already using the PUSH method in line with the provisions of the existing agreement with the US?
Ali pogajanja med Komisijo in Združenimi državami Amerike potekajo?
Are negotiations between the Commission and the United States ongoing?
Ali bo Komisija zagotovila, da prenos podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih v ZDA, Kanado in Avstralijo v nobenem primeru ne bo oviral temeljne svoboščine evropskih državljanov do prostega potovanja v te države?
Will the Commission ensure that the transfer of PNR to the US, Canada and Australia shall under no circumstances whatsoever hinder the fundamental freedom of movement of European citizens to those countries?
Ali bo osnutek sporazuma vseboval sklic na to temeljno človekovo pravico, kot je omenjena v Mednarodnem paktu o političnih in državljanskih pravicah in Listini EU?
Will the draft agreement include a reference to this fundamental human right, as mentioned by the ICCPR and the EU Charter?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000157/2011
Question for oral answer O-000157/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Pomoč Evropske unije pri procesu demokratične tranzicije v Tuniziji in sprejemu beguncev
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: EU aid for the democratic transition process in Tunisia and for receiving refugees
EU je od 14. januarja 2011 večkrat potrdila svojo zavezanost k podpori demokratičnemu procesu v Tuniziji.
Since 14 January 2011 the European Union has repeatedly declared its readiness to support the democratic process in Tunisia.
Zagotovila je znatno humanitarno pomoč za sprejem več sto tisoč beguncev, ki so v Tunizijo prispeli po vstaji in spopadih v Libiji, pomagala pa je tudi pri organiziranju begunskih taborišč in vrnitvi tujih državljanov domov.
In particular, the EU has provided substantial humanitarian aid for receiving the hundreds of thousands of refugees arriving in Tunisia since the start of the uprising and conflict in Libya and has helped set up refugee camps and repatriate people to their country of origin.
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje je 15. junija 2011 pododboru Evropskega parlamenta za človekove pravice poročala, da je v taboriščih 6.000 ljudi ter da je 780 beguncem obljubljena preselitev.
The EEAS reported to Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights on 15 June 2011 that there were 6 000 people in the camps and that the resettlement of 780 refugees had been promised.
Ali nam lahko Komisija pove, katere države članice so zavezale, da bodo sprejele begunce, in ali lahko na kratko poroča o razpravah, ki jih je imela s Svetom in državami članicami, da bi beguncem, ki jih je odobren sprejem, omogočili prihod?
Could the Commission indicate which Member States have given undertakings to receive refugees and could it inform us about the discussions held with the Council and the Member States with a view to enabling refugees who have been accepted to be received?
EU je še napovedala, da bo poleg človekoljubne pomoči zagotovila tudi pomoč za reševanje gospodarske krize, ki sta jo povzročila predvsem upad prihodkov iz turizma ter zmanjšanje trgovine z Libijo .
The European Union has also announced that, in addition to humanitarian aid, aid will be unblocked to deal with the economic crisis triggered in particular by the drop in tourism revenue and the shrinking of trade with Libya.
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje je pododboru za človekove pravice potrdila, da sredstva še niso sproščena, čeprav so že bili opredeljeni finančni instrumenti, ki jih je treba sprožiti.
The EEAS confirmed to the Subcommittee on Human Rights that, whilst the financial instruments that needed to be mobilised had been identified, the funds had not yet been unblocked.
Ali nam Komisija lahko predstavi razloge za zamudo pri izplačilu pomoči ter pove, kdaj bodo sredstva dejansko izplačana?
Could the Commission explain the reasons for this delay in the payment of aid and inform Parliament of how much longer it will be before this aid is paid?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000158/2011
Question for oral answer O-000158/2011
Zadeva: Smernice glede državne pomoči za energetsko intenzivne industrijske panoge
Subject: State aid guidelines concerning energy-intensive industries
Sklep Komisije št. 2011/278/EU z dne 27. aprila 2011 o določitvi prehodnih pravil za usklajeno brezplačno dodelitev pravic do emisije na ravni Unije v skladu s členom 10a Direktive 2003/87/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo št. 2009/29/ES, predvideva dodelitev brezplačnih pravic le za neposredne emisije, in sicer do zgornje meje, določene s sistemom referenčnih vrednosti.
Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2009/29/EC, plans to allocate free allowances only for direct emissions up to a ceiling to be determined by a system of benchmarks.
Sklep pa ne vključuje približno 70 % emisij iz električnih peči – posrednih emisij, ki jih proizvajajo termoelektrarne, ki poganjajo peči.
However, some 70% of electric furnace emissions – indirect emissions produced by the thermal power stations that feed the furnaces – are excluded from this decision.
Učinek emisij CO2 na ceno električne energije bo prizadel industrijski sistem, saj bodo kaznovani sektorji, ki porabijo več energije (jeklarstvo).
The impact of the CO2 emissions on the price of electricity will affect the industrial system by penalising those sectors with a higher consumption of energy (including the steel industry).
Evropska komisija je s sklepom št. 2010/2/EU z dne 24. decembra 2009 priznala, da je jeklarski sektor izpostavljen visokemu tveganju selitve virov CO2 ter posledični izgubi pomembnega deleža trga v korist obratov, ki so manj učinkoviti, kar zadeva emisije ogljika, in se nahajajo zunaj EU.
In its Decision 2010/2/EU of 24 December 2009, the Commission acknowledged that steel production was a sector exposed to a high risk of carbon leakage, which would result in a significant loss of market share to less carbon efficient installations outside the Union.
S tem je Komisija naznanila izgubo konkurenčnosti evropskega industrijskega sistema v primerjavi z vodilnimi državami zunaj EU, ki okolju posvečajo manj pozornosti.
This would herald a loss of competitiveness of European industry compared to the leading non-EU countries that pay less attention to the environment.
Direktiva št. 2003/87/ES v odstavku 6 člena 10a določa, da lahko države članice sprejmejo finančne ukrepe v korist sektorjev, ki so po ocenah izpostavljeni visokemu tveganju selitve virov CO2, da bi s tem nadomestile stroške, povezane z emisijami toplogrednih plinov, vključene v cene električne energije (posredni stroški), kadar so ti finančni ukrepi skladni s pravili o državni pomoči.
Article 10a(6) of Directive 2003/87/EC stipulates that Member States may adopt financial measures in favour of sectors determined to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage due to costs relating to greenhouse gas emissions passed on in electricity prices (indirect costs), in order to compensate for those costs and where such financial measures are in accordance with state aid rules.
Ali namerava Komisija v prihodnjih smernicah glede državne pomoči, predvidene v okviru novega sistema trgovanja z emisijami EU, sprejeti ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovila, da bi bil sektor proizvodnje jekla v električnih pečeh (in s tem povezanih valjarnah) uvrščen med sektorje, ki so upravičeni do nadomestnih ukrepov iz odstavka 6 člena 10a Direktive št. 2003/87/ES, ter da bi bili ti nadomestni ukrepi sorazmerni z nastalimi stroški?
In the future state aid guidelines under the new EU emissions trading scheme, does the Commission intend to take any measures to ensure that the steel production sector using electric furnaces (and related rolling mills) is recognised as one of the sectors that are eligible for the compensatory measures provided for in Article 10a(6) of Directive 2003/87/EC and that those compensatory measures are proportionate to the costs borne?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000159/2011
Question for oral answer O-000159/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Stanje pogajanj z Avstralijo, ZDA in Kanado o uporabi in prenosu podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR)
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: State of play regarding the negotiations with Australia, the US and Canada on the use and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data
Ali Komisija meni, da je pogostost ad hoc uporabe metode „pull“ pridobivanja podatkov ameriških oblasti iz sistemov prevoznikov, ki že uporabljajo metodo „push“, v skladu z določbami obstoječega sporazuma z ZDA?
Does the Commission consider the frequency of ad hoc PULLs by the US authorities from the systems of carriers that are already using the PUSH method, in line with the provisions of the existing agreement with the US?
Kakšne so posledice pravnega mnenja, ki ga je podala pravna služba Komisije?
What consequences does the Commission draw from the legal opinion of its own legal service?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000160/2011
Question for oral answer O-000160/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Stanje pogajanj z Avstralijo, ZDA in Kanado o uporabi in prenosu podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR)
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: State of play regarding the negotiations with Australia, the US and Canada on the use and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data
Kakšne posledice predvideva Komisija od pravnega mnenja svoje pravne službe?
What consequences does the Commission envisage from the legal opinion of its own legal service?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000161/2011
Question for oral answer O-000161/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Pomoč Evropske unije pri procesu demokratične tranzicije v Tuniziji
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: EU support for the democratic transition process in Tunisia
EU je od 14. januarja 2011 večkrat potrdila svojo zavezanost k podpori demokratičnemu procesu v Tuniziji.
Since 14 January 2011, the European Union has repeatedly declared its readiness to support the democratic process in Tunisia.
Zagotovila je znatno humanitarno pomoč za sprejem več sto tisoč beguncev, ki so v Tunizijo prispeli po vstaji in spopadih v Libiji, pomagala pa je tudi pri organiziranju begunskih taborišč in vrnitvi tujih državljanov domov.
In particular, the EU has provided substantial humanitarian aid to fund reception arrangements for the hundreds of thousands of refugees who have arrived in Tunisia since the start of the uprising and conflict in Libya.