natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zaradi vseh teh nesreč ter njihovih učinkov na prizadevanja EU za gospodarsko in socialno kohezijo, zaščito okolja ter ohranitev kulturne dediščine, je preprečevanje tovrstnih naravnih nesreč postalo nadvse pomembno za države članice in Evropsko unijo kot celoto.
In view of all these incidents, and their effects on EU efforts for economic and social cohesion, environmental protection, and preservation of cultural heritage, preventing such natural disasters has become a matter of utmost importance for Member States and for the European Union as a whole.
Komisija je nedavno sprejela sporočilo (KOM(2008)0130 – 5.3.2008) o okrepitvi zmogljivosti odzivanja Unije na nesreče z novim mehanizmom Skupnosti za civilno zaščito, ki bo služil kot operacijski center za usklajevanje odziva na nesreče.
The Commission recently adopted a Communication (COM(2008)0130 - 5.3.2008) to reinforce the Union's disaster response capacity, with a new Community Civil Protection Mechanism which will serve as an operational centre for the coordination of response to disasters.
Je ob tem spodbudnem razvoju preprečevanja posledic prihodnjih velikih naravnih nesreč pripravljen tudi že kakšen oprijemljiv celovit pristop k preprečevanju nesreč na ravni EU?
While this is an encouraging development as regards addressing the consequences of major natural disasters in the future, is there already any tangible, comprehensive approach to disaster prevention at EU level?
Kateri so bili konkretni ukrepi Komisije in držav članic za usklajevanje in doseganje učinkovitosti programov in ukrepanj Skupnosti pri preprečevanju nesreč in blažitvi njihovih posledic po lanskih izkušnjah, ob upoštevanju, da imajo tovrstne nesreče lahko resne posledice za zaščito evropske naravne in kulturne dediščine ter tudi za prihodnjo dodelitev sredstev Skupnosti za blažitev posledic katastrof?
After the experiences of last year, what were the concrete measures from the Commission and the Member States for the coordination and effectiveness of Community programmes and actions in preventing disasters and mitigating their consequences, taking into account that such disasters can have grave consequences both for the protection of Europe's natural and cultural heritage and for the subsequent allocation of Community funds needed to mitigate the effects of catastrophes?
Na kateri stopnji je Komisija pri vzpostavitvi načrta za oblikovanje mehanizma za preprečevanje nesreč?
What stage has the Commission reached in setting up a project for establishing a disaster prevention mechanism?
Kakšne so stopnje porabe sredstev Skupnosti, namenjenih predvsem državam članicam južne Evrope pa tudi ostalim članicam, za zaščito pred gozdnimi požari in drugimi večjimi naravnimi nesrečami (npr. poplavami)?
What are the take-up rates of Community appropriations committed, primarily but not exclusively in southern European Member States, for protection from forest fires and other major natural disasters (e.g. floods)?
Ali se pripravljajo kakšne posebne proračunske določbe za nujno podporo v prihajajočem poletnem obdobju?
Are there specific budgetary provisions for urgent support in the forthcoming summer period?
Je Komisija ocenila učinkovitost pripravljenosti ter mehanizmov usklajevanja držav članic za preprečevanje in odziv med velikimi nevarnostmi gozdnih požarov lani poleti ter katere nujne ukrepe je izvedla, da bi zadostila pomembnim potrebam v prihajajočem poletju?
Has the Commission evaluated the effectiveness of Member States' preparedness and cooperation mechanisms in the prevention and response during last summer's forest fire emergencies and what urgent, practical measures has the Commission taken in order to respond to the major needs in the forthcoming summer?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0066/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0066/08
Zadeva: Poročilo o napredku reforme evropskih šol
Subject: Progress report on the reform of the European Schools
Evropski parlament je v svojih resolucijah P5_TA(2002)0605 in P6_TA(2005)0336 pozval k temeljiti reformi sistema evropskih šol (EŠ) za njegovo boljše upravljanje in odprtost sistema.
In its resolutions P5_TA(2002)0605 and P6_TA(2005)0336 Parliament called for a thoroughgoing reform of the European Schools system with a view to improving its governance and opening it up.
Ob upoštevanju postopne širitve EU in povečevanja števila agencij v različnih krajih napotitve njenega osebja ter prilagodljivejših pogodb o zaposlitvi, ali ni nujna reforma sistema EŠ, ki je bil zasnovan pred več kot 50 leti?
In the light of the successive enlargements of the EU, the increase in the number of agencies and places of work and the introduction of more flexible employment contracts, is a reform of the European Schools model, devised more than 50 years ago, now not urgently needed?
Ali ni čas za to, da bi evropskim državljanom ponudili večjezičen in prilagodljiv šolski model, ki bo upošteval njihovo mobilnost in potrebo, da svojim otrokom nudijo resnično evropsko izobraževanje, hkrati pa ohranil bistvene pridobitve: poučevanje maternega jezika, učitelji, katerih jezik poučevanja je njihov materni jezik, končno spričevalo in njegovo priznavanje v vseh državah članicah EU?
Is it not time to offer European citizens a multilingual and flexible educational model which takes account of their mobility and their wish to offer their children a genuinely European education, whilst safeguarding the achievements of the existing system: the teaching of each pupil's mother tongue, the use of teachers who are native speakers of the language in which a subject is taught, the final diploma and the recognition of that diploma by all the EU Member States?
Ali ni pojmovanje EŠ kot elitnih ter v zadnjih desetletjih postopno izključevanje učencev, ki niso otroci uradnikov, razlikovanje med učenci po kategorijah I, II ali III celo v EŠ glede na to, ali so otroci uradnikov, v nasprotju s cilji večje mobilnosti evropskega državljana na trgu dela?
On that basis, are not the perception of the European Schools as elitist, the gradual exclusion over recent decades of pupils who are not children of officials and the division of pupils in the European Schools themselves into categories I, II or III depending on whether or not they are children of officials developments which are at odds with the objectives of greater labour market mobility?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen v procesu reforme in odprtosti za zagotavljanje prehoda sistema EŠ v sistem evropskega šolstva, ki bo ohranjal dosedanje pridobitve?
What progress has been made with the work of reforming and opening up the European Schools system with a view to transforming it into a genuinely European educational system, whilst safeguarding its achievements?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen na področju izobraževanja za učence s posebnimi potrebami?
What progress has been made in the area of education for special-needs pupils?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0067/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0067/08
Zadeva: Odgovor EU na izziv državnih premoženjskih skladov
Subject: The EU answer to the challenge of sovereign wealth funds
Rast državnih premoženjskih skladov, investicijskih instrumentov v lasti vlad, ki vlagajo presežke državnih sredstev, je hitra, prav tako pa politične polemike in morebitna tveganja, ki jih povzročajo.
SWF, government-owned investment vehicles that invest surplus state funds, are growing rapidly; so also are the political controversy and the potential risks they give rise to.
Zaradi krize na trgu hipotekarnih posojil in njenih posledic je vloga državnih premoženjskih skladov nepričakovano postala jasnejša.
The subprime crisis and its consequences had the unexpected effect of shedding light on sovereign wealth funds (SWF).
Pojavile so se nove priložnosti zanje, med drugim so nekateri pred stečajem rešili nekatere večje banke.
It created new opportunities for SWF, some of which have come to rescue some major banks.
Ali Svet meni, da je zaradi različnih nacionalnih pobud potrebno usklajevanje na ravni EU, da bi poenotili predpise držav članic in ustvarili resnično enake pogoje za vse, ob tem pa omogočili učinkovito in pravočasno ukrepanje v primeru, da bi bili prizadeti občutljivi sektorji?
At the European level, do you think that the various current national initiatives create a need for EU coordination, which could bring together regulation elaborated by Member States in order to safeguard a true level playing field, while ensuring a potential for effective and timely answers, should sensitive sectors be affected?
Ali se glede na to Svet strinja, da bi morala Komisija preučiti pobude v državah članicah in preveriti, ali so skladne z zakonodajo EU?
In that regard do you not think that the Commission should conduct a review to check Member States' initiatives and their compliance with EU law?
Ali ne bi bilo primerno, da bi objektivno ocenili različna orodja, ki so na voljo (npr. zahteve po preglednosti, glasovalne pravice državnih premoženjskih skladov, posebne, zlate delnice, pravice delničarjev), in na ravni EU oblikovali pristop za občutljive sektorje, ki bi presegel nacionalne meje?
Would it be appropriate to evaluate objectively the range of tools we have at our disposal (i.e. transparency requirements, voting rights of SWF, golden shares, shareholders' rights) and to have an EU approach to sensitive sectors that would overcome national borders?
Kaj Svet meni o sistemu registracije teh skladov?
What do you think of a registration system for these funds?
V kolikšni meri bi bilo po mnenju Sveta treba razjasniti člen 58 Pogodbe o ES, ki predvideva omejitve pretoka kapitala in plačil zaradi javnega reda ali miru, da bo zagotavljal popolno združljivost z interesi EU in popolno delovanje notranjega trga?
To what extent do you consider Article 58 of the EC Treaty, which provides for restrictions on capital and payment movements on grounds of public policy/public order, to be in need of clarification in order to guarantee full compatibility with EU interests and perfect functioning of the internal market?
Kako naj EU ravna na svetovni ravni?
At the global level, what do you think the EU should do?
Ali naj utira poti k svetovnemu pristopu do državnih premoženjskih skladov, se zavzema za najboljše primere iz prakse in se navsezadnje posveti vzajemni odprtosti trgov?
Should it be leading the way for a global approach to SWFs, promoting best practices and finally tackling the reciprocity of market openness?
Kaj Svet meni o tem, da EU vnaprej opredeli trdno stališče in vztraja pri njem, zlasti v pogajanjih na svetovni ravni?
What do you think of defining and promoting a strong EU position ex ante, especially in global negotiations?
In kaj meni o temeljitem premisleku o delovanju svetovnih trgov ter predlogih na ustreznih mednarodnih forumih?
What do you think about running a fundamental reflection on the functioning of global markets and then making proposals to the appropriate international fora?
Ali Svet meni, da je treba ukrepati glede naftnih monarhij, ki poslabšujejo že tako neuravnotežen menjalni tečaj evra in dolarja, saj se nafta prodaja v dolarjih, izkupiček pa se nato prek državnih premoženjskih skladov vlaga v evrska sredstva?
Do you think that action is needed regarding the oil monarchies, which are worsening the euro-dollar exchange rate disequilibrium, as oil is sold in dollars which are reinvested via SWFs in euro assets?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0068/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0068/08
Ali Komisija meni, da je zaradi različnih nacionalnih pobud potrebno usklajevanje na ravni EU, da bi poenotili predpise držav članic in ustvarili resnično enake pogoje za vse, ob tem pa omogočili učinkovito in pravočasno ukrepanje v primeru, da bi bili prizadeti občutljivi sektorji?
At the European level, do you think that the various current national initiatives create a need for EU coordination, which could bring together regulation elaborated by Member States in order to safeguard a true level playing field, while ensuring a potential for effective and timely answers, should sensitive sectors be affected?
Ali glede na to Komisija preučuje pobude v državah članicah in preverja, ali so skladne z zakonodajo EU?
In that regard is the Commission conducting a review to check Member States' initiatives and their compliance with EU law?
Kaj Komisija meni o sistemu registracije teh skladov?
What do you think of a registration system for these funds?
V kolikšni meri bi bilo po mnenju Komisije treba razjasniti člen 58 Pogodbe o ES, ki predvideva omejitve pretoka kapitala in plačil zaradi javnega reda ali miru, da bo zagotavljal popolno združljivost z interesi EU in popolno delovanje notranjega trga?
To what extent do you consider Art. 58 of the EC Treaty, which provides for restrictions on capital and payment movements on grounds of public policy/public order, to be in need of clarification in order to guarantee full compatibility with EU interests and perfect functioning of the internal market?
Kaj Komisija meni o tem, da EU vnaprej opredeli trdno stališče in vztraja pri njem, zlasti v pogajanjih na svetovni ravni?
What do you think of defining and promoting a strong EU position ex ante, especially in global negotiations?
Ali Komisija meni, da je treba ukrepati glede naftnih monarhij, ki poslabšujejo že tako neuravnotežen menjalni tečaj evra in dolarja, saj se nafta prodaja v dolarjih, izkupiček pa se nato prek državnih premoženjskih skladov vlaga v evrska sredstva?
Do you think that action is needed regarding the oil monarchies, which are worsening the euro-dollar exchange rate disequilibrium, as oil is sold in dollars which are reinvested via SWFs in euro assets?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0069/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0069/08
Zadeva: Kloniranje živali za preskrbo s hrano
Subject: Cloning of animals for food supply
Direktiva 98/58/ES navaja „Metode ekstenzivne in intenzivne reje, ki povzročajo ali lahko povzročijo trpljenje ali poškodbo katere koli zadevne živali, niso dovoljeni“.
Directive 98/58/EC states that ‘Natural or artificial breeding or breeding procedures which cause or are likely to cause suffering or injury to any of the animals concerned must not be practised’.
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi pojasnila o dobrem počutju in zdravju kloniranih živali in njihovih mladičev?
Can the Commission provide long-term animal welfare and health indications for clones and their offspring?
Kaj je Komisija doslej storila, da bi preprečila vstop uvožene hrane iz kloniranih živali in njihovih mladičev v živilsko verigo?
What has the Commission done so far in order to stop the import of food from cloned animals and their offspring reaching the food chain?
UL L 221 z dne 8.8.1998, str.
OJ L 221, 8.8.1998, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0070/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0070/08
Zadeva: Napredek v Svetu glede okvirne direktive o varstvu tal
Subject: Progress in Council on the Framework Directive on Soil Protection
Evropski parlament je na prvi obravnavi sprejel mnenje ( P6_TA(2007)0509 ) o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi okvira za varstvo tal in spremembi direktive 2004/35/ES z dne 14. novembra 2007 (poročevalka: Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines).
The European Parliament adopted its first-reading opinion ( P6_TA(2007)0509 ) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC on 14 November 2007 (Rapporteur: Mrs Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines).
Še vedno ni znano, kdaj bo Svet lahko sprejel skupno stališče in ga posredoval Parlamentu.
It is unclear when the Council will be able to adopt a common position and communicate it to the European Parliament.
Kakšen napredek je Svet dosegel po sprejetju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta na prvi obravnavi in kdaj bo lahko slednjemu glede na zdajšnje načrte posredoval skupno stališče?
What progress has there been within the Council since the adoption of the first-reading opinion of the European Parliament and when, according to the current timetable, will the Council be able to communicate the common position to the European Parliament?
UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str.
OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0071/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0071/08
Zadeva: Krepitev zmogljivosti Unije pri odzivanju na nesreče
Subject: Reinforcing the Union's disaster response capacity
Ali bi lahko Komisija pojasnila, kakšne dejanske ukrepe namerava sprejeti, da bo mogoče v celoti doseči vse cilje celovitega okvira za preprečevanje in bolj celovite zmogljivosti pri odzivanju na nesreče znotraj in/ali zunaj Evropske unije?
Could the Commission clarify which concrete measures it intends to take to fully achieve the objectives of a comprehensive framework on prevention and a more integrated disaster response capacity within and/or outside the European Union?
Kdaj namerava Komisija predstaviti predlog za takšen celovit evropski pristop za preprečevanje naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek?
When is the Commission planning to submit proposals for such an integrated European approach to the prevention of natural and man-made disasters?
Kateri bi bili glavni elementi predloga Komisije?
What would the main elements of the Commission's proposals be?
Ali je Komisija ugotovila pomanjkljivosti pri odzivanju na nesreče na področju civilne zaščite EU in katere so?
Has the Commission identified any gaps in disaster response in the area of EU civil protection and which are they?
Kako namerava te pomanjkljivosti odpraviti?
How is it planning to address the existing gaps?
Ali je EU zadostno pripravljena v primeru, da katastrofe sočasno prizadenejo sosednje evropske države?
Is the EU sufficiently prepared in case of disasters affecting adjacent European countries simultaneously?
Kakšen je odziv Komisije na resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o vzpostavitvi enote za hitro posredovanje na evropski ravni ( P6_TA(2007)0362 ), ki bi se bila sposobna odzivati na nevarnosti ob naravnih nesrečah?
What is the Commission's reaction to the European Parliament's resolution ( P6_TA(2007)0362 ) for the creation of a rapid reaction force at European level, capable of responding to the risks posed by natural disasters?
Kakšne načrte ima Komisija za okrepitev evropske civilne zaščite, preprečevanja, pripravljenosti in zmogljivosti odzivanja glede gozdnih požarov in drugih požarov?
What plans does the Commission have to strengthen the EU civil protection, prevention, preparedness and response capability in connection with forest fires and other wildfires?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0072/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0072/08
Ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o evropskem pogodbenem pravu z dni 12. decembra 2007 ( P6_TA(2007)0615 ), 7. septembra 2006 (> P6_TA(2006)0352 ) in 23. marca 2006 (> P6_TA(2006)0109 ),
Having regard to its resolutions on European Contract Law of 12 December 2007 ( P6_TA(2007)0615 ), of 7 September 2006 ( P6_TA(2006)0352 ) and of 23 March 2006 ( P6_TA(2006)0109 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije s 25. julija 2007 z naslovom „Drugo poročilo o napredku skupnega referenčnega okvira“ (KOM(2007)0447),
having regard to the report from the Commission of 25 July 2007 entitled ‘Second Progress Report on the CFR’ (COM(2007)0447),
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta PNZ z dne 18. aprila 2008,
having regard to the conclusions of the JHA Council of 18 April 2008,
ker je bil strokovni osnutek skupnega referenčnega okvira predstavljen Komisiji konec leta 2007;
whereas the academic Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) was presented to the Commission at the end of 2007,
ker je Komisija pripravila več delavnic v zvezi s skupnim referenčnim okvirom, katerih zaključki se ne odražajo v osnutku.;
whereas the Commission has organised several CFR workshops, and their outcomes are not reflected in the DCFR,
ker Komisija na podlagi izbranih delov osnutka pripravlja belo knjigo o skupnem referenčnem okviru;
whereas the Commission is preparing a White Paper on a Common Frame of Reference (CFR) on the basis of selected parts of the DCFR,
ker bo ta okvir v veliki meri vplival na zakonodajno delo na področju pogodbenega prva;
whereas the CFR will greatly influence future legislative work in contract law,
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila dostopnost osnutka skupnega referenčnega okvira v kar največ jezikih, da bo lahko na voljo vsem zainteresiranim stranem?
How will the Commission ensure that the DCFR is available in the greatest number of languages, so that it is accessible to all interested stakeholders?
Kakšne ukrepe izvaja Komisija za uskladitev dela vseh generalnih direktoratov, ki sodelujejo pri pripravi bele knjige?
What measures has the Commission implemented to coordinate the work of all the DGs involved in the preparation of the White Paper on a CFR?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se bodo zaključki nedavno organiziranih delavnic na to temo odražali v beli knjigi?
How will the Commission ensure that the outcome of the recently organised CFR workshops will be reflected in the White Paper?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da ne bi bilo potrebno izključiti nobene vsebine ali gradiva osnutka, če bo skupni referenčni okvir nezavezujoče zakonodajno orodje?
Does the Commission agree that there is no need to exclude any content or materials of the DCFR should the CFR form a non-binding legislative tool?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi skupni referenčni okvir lahko postal neobvezni instrument, omejen na področja, kjer je zakonodajalec Skupnosti bil ali verjetno bo dejaven ali ki so tesno povezana s pogodbenim pravom?
Does the Commission agree that the CFR could result in an optional instrument confined to those areas where the Community legislator has been, or is likely to be, active, or which are closely linked to contract law?
Na kakšen način bo Komisija v postopke izbire vključila Parlament?
How will the Commission involve the Parliament in any selection process?
Kako si Komisija predstavlja posodabljanje skupnega referenčnega okvira?
How does the Commission envisage that the CFR will be kept up to date?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0073/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0073/08
Predsednik Parlamenta je 28. januarja 2008 pisal Svetu in zahteval, da se Svet v skladu s postopkom privolitve posvetuje s Parlamentom, saj sporazum vzpostavlja „poseben institucionalni okvir”.
On 28 January 2008 the President of Parliament wrote to the Council to request that Parliament be consulted on the basis of the assent procedure, as the agreement establishes 'a specific institutional framework'.
Slovenski stalni predstavnik je 23. maja odgovoril v imenu Sveta in zavrnil spremembo postopka.
On 23 May 2008, the Slovenian Permanent Representative replied on behalf of the Council, refusing to modify the procedure.
pove, kdaj namerava sprejeti sporazum?
Say when it expects to conclude the agreement?
obrazloži, zakaj ne sprejme dejstva, da ta sporazum vzpostavlja „poseben institucionalni okvir“ v smislu drugega odstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti?
Explain why it does not accept that this agreement establishes 'a specific institutional framework' within the meaning of Article 300(3), second subparagraph, of the EC Treaty?
pove, ali se strinja, da bo privolitev Parlamenta sporazumu dala večjo legitimnost in strinjanje javnosti?
Say whether it agrees that parliamentary assent would give the agreement greater legitimacy and public acceptability?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0074/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0074/08
Predsednik Parlamenta je 28. januarja 2008 pisal Svetu in zahteval, da se Svet v skladu s postopkom privolitve posvetuje s Parlamentom, saj sporazum vzpostavlja „poseben institucionalni okvir“.
On 28 January 2008 the President of Parliament wrote to the Council to request that Parliament be consulted on the basis of the assent procedure, as the agreement establishes ‘a specific institutional framework’.
glede na to, da sta čezmerno izkoriščanje in nezakonita sečnja še vedno zelo razširjena, pripravi oceno učinkovitosti sporazumov o tropskem lesu v zadnjih dvajsetih letih?
In the light of the fact that overexploitation and illegal logging remain widespread, provide its assessment of the effectiveness of 20 years of tropical timber agreements?