natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali bo Svet ponovno obravnaval temo skupnega okvira za evropske regulativne agencije in pojasnil, ali je predlog Komisije o okvirni uredbi ali osnutek skupne politične izjave o nameri vseh treh organov načeloma sprejemljiv?
Will the Council again address the subject of the operating framework for the European regulatory agencies and clarify whether a Commission proposal for a framework regulation or a draft joint political declaration of intent by the three institutions is acceptable in principle?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0084/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0084/06
Ali bo Komisija, če bo Svet izjavil, da je predlog okvirne uredbe ali osnutek skupne politične izjave o nameri vseh treh organov načeloma sprejemljiv, umaknila svoj osnutek medinstitucionalnega sporazuma in predložila ustrezen predlog ali osnutek?
If the Council declares that a proposal for a framework regulation or a draft joint political declaration of intent by the three institutions is acceptable in principle, will the Commission withdraw its draft interinstitutional agreement and submit a corresponding proposal or draft?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0085/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0085/06
, v imenu Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
, on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
Zadeva: Položaj v sektorju jagodičevja in češenj, namenjenih za predelavo
Subject: Situation of the sector of soft fruits and cherries intended for processing
28. junija 2006 je Evropska komisija predstavila poročilo o položaju v sektorju jagodičevja in češenj, namenjenih za predelavo (KOM(2006)0345 konč.).
On 28 June 2006, the Commission presented the report on the situation of the sector of soft fruits and cherries intended for processing (COM(2006)0345 final).
Poročilo potrjuje že znane okoliščine in kaže, da imamo na trgu jagodičevja trajno krizo.
The report confirms what is known about the current situation and indicates that the soft fruit market is undergoing a lasting crisis.
Kriza zadeva predvsem nove države članice, še zlasti Poljsko, negativne posledice krize pa so v najrevnejših regijah Unije precejšnje.
The crisis mainly affects the new Member States, particularly Poland, and its negative consequences in the poorest regions of the EU are considerable.
Čeprav je Parlament že večkrat poudaril, kako pomemben je ta problem, doslej Evropska komisija še ni sprejela nobenega ukrepa, ki je potreben za rešitev te krize.
Although Parliament has repeatedly emphasised the importance of this problem, the Commission has yet to take any of the steps necessary to resolve this crisis.
Ali lahko Komisija navede, katere ukrepe namerava predlagati, da bi:
Could the Commission indicate what measures it intends to propose in order to:
zmanjšala uvoz jagodičevja, namenjenega za predelavo, iz tretjih držav, predvsem da bi odpravila damping, značilen za ta uvoz?
decrease imports from third countries of soft fruits intended for processing, particularly by putting a stop to the dumping practices that characterise certain imports;
uvedla mehanizem za podporo skupinam in organizacijam pridelovalcev, ki so posebej prilagojeni položaju v novih državah članicah?
introduce a support mechanism for groups and organisations of producers specifically adapted to the situation of the new Member States;
bilo lažje dobiti nadomestila za škodo, ki jo povzročijo neugodne podnebne razmere?
make it easier to obtain compensation for damage caused by adverse weather conditions;
kmetom, ki se znajdejo v nepredvidenem in začasnem težkem položaju zaradi presežne ponudbe na trgu, omogočila pridobitev nadomestil za opustitev pridelka?
give growers the possibility of obtaining compensation for crop abandonment in the event of an unexpected temporary adverse situation caused by excessive supply on the market;
države članice spodbudila k uvedbi finančnih spodbud za uničevanje nasadov jagodičevja v primeru presežka na trgu?
call on the Member States to introduce financial incentives for the destruction of soft fruit plantations in the event of a situation of excess on the market;
sprostila sredstva za spodbujanje porabe jagodičevja v Evropski uniji?
release funds to promote the consumption of soft fruits in the EU?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0086/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0086/06
Zadeva: Vprašanje Svetu o napredku, doseženem v območju svobode, varnosti in pravice (člena 2 in 39 PEU)
Subject: Question to the Council for the annual debate on the progress made in the Area of freedom, security and justice (Articles 2 and 39 of the EU Treaty)
Sedem let po pričetku veljavnosti Amsterdamske pogodbe in šest let po razglasitvi Listine o temeljnih pravicah se zdi očitno, da morata ti besedili postati središče strategije za preoblikovanje EU v območje svobode, varnosti in pravice (člen 2 TEU).
Seven years after the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty and six after the declaration of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, it appears evident that these texts must become the core of the strategy to transform the EU into an area of freedom, security and justice (Article 2 TEU).
Se Svetu pri posodobitvi haaškega programa ne zdi potrebno poskrbeti za ustrezno in učinkovito zagotavljanje načel, ki jih je sam razglasil v Listini, ob hkratnem bolj jasnem izpostavljanju povezave med temi načeli in vsakim izmed zastavljenih ciljev?
When updating the Hague programme, does the Council not think that it should ensure that the principles which it itself proclaimed in the Charter are properly and effectively upheld, and that at the same time it should make the link between those principles and each specific objective more obvious?
V tej luči Parlament od Sveta zahteva, da sprejme potrebne ukrepe z namenom:
To this end, Parliament asks the Council to take all necessary steps notably to:
(zagotavljanja, da pristojnost Agencije za temeljne pravice ni omejena na prvi steber, ampak pokriva tudi področja iz tretjega stebra (pravosodno in policijsko sodelovanje);
make sure that the competence of the Fundamental Rights Agency is not limited to the first pillar but also covers third-pillar issues (judicial and police cooperation);
spremembe Uredbe (ES) št.1049/2001 tako, da bi bilo upoštevano stališče Parlamenta;
modify Regulation (CE) No. 1049/2001 in order to take the European Parliament's position into account;
čimprejšnjega sprejetja okvirnega sklepa v tretjem stebru o varstvu podatkov, s čimer se bo izpolnili zavezo, podano v čas britanskega predsedstva, da bo ta sklep sprejet skupaj z direktivo o hrambi podatkov;
adopt as soon as possible the Framework Decision on data protection in the third pillar, so as to comply with its commitment under the British Presidency to adopt it together with the Directive on data retention;
sprejetja ustreznih pobud za reševanje problematike pomanjkanja medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami in čimprejšnje sprejetje okvirnega sklepa o postopkovnih pravicah, evropskem dokaznem nalogu in sklepa o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji;
take appropriate initiatives to remedy the lack of mutual trust between Member States and adopt without any further delay the Framework Decision on procedural rights, on the European Evidence Warrant and the decision on the fight against racism and xenophobia;
zagotoviti odpravo nadzora na notranjih mejah z novimi državami članicami od prihodnjega leta dalje, s čimer bi okrepili pravico prostega gibanja vseh državljanov Evropske unije.
abolish checks as early as next year at the borders between the old and the new Member States, in order to extend the right of free movement to all EU citizens.
Ker politika varstva pravic ni verodostojna brez možnosti pritožbe pred sodiščem, je Komisija predlagala črtanje trenutnih omejitev možnosti napotitve primerov Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti s strani državnih sodnikov (člen 68 PES).
As a fundamental rights protection policy is not credible without the possibility of referral to a court, the Commission has just proposed lifting the current restrictions on access to the Court of Justice for national judges (Art. 68 TEC).
Se Svetu ne zdi nujno upoštevati predlogov Komisije in EP ter skupaj s Sodiščem presoditi, kaj je potrebno storiti, da bi se do konca obdobja haaškega programa dolžina obravnave primerov s strani Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti skrajšala za najmanj polovico, zlasti kar zadeva temeljne pravice?
Does the Council not consider it urgent to follow the suggestions made by the Commission and the Parliament and evaluate with the Court the steps still required to reduce at least by half, by the end of the Hague Programme, the current duration of proceedings, notably those which relate to fundamental rights?
Je Svet pripravljen prilagoditi pristojnosti Sodišča, kar zadeva prečkanje notranjih mej (člen 68(2) PSE)?
Is the Council prepared to adapt the powers of the Court as regards the crossing of internal borders (Art. 68.2 TEC)?
Od vrha v Tampereju in predvsem po atentatih 11. septembra je Evropski svet soočen z razkorakom med odobrenimi strategijami in njihovim izvajanjem in ne podpira temeljnih pravic, državljanskih svoboščin ob hkratnem zagotavljanju večje varnosti.
Since Tampere and even more after the attacks of 11 September, the European Council has been faced with a gap between the strategies it agrees and their implementation and it is failing to promote fundamental rights and civil liberties and at the same time to increase the level of public security.
Komisija in Parlament predlagata uporabo "premostitvene" klavzule, predvidene v členu 42 PEU in členu 67 PSE.
The Commission and the Parliament propose activation of the 'bridging clauses' provided for in Articles 42 TEU and 67 TEC.
Ali Svet namerava upoštevati ta predlog?
Does the Council intend to take up this suggestion?
Bo Svet zagotovil, da bodo sprejeti ukrepi v celoti preneseni v zakonodajo držav članic in se bodo v njih izvajali?
Will the Council also ensure that measures adopted are fully transposed and implemented at national level?
Se bo Svet pogajal z Evropskim parlamentom o vključitvi Europola v pogodbe primarne evropske zakonodaje, saj nobeden od protokolov h Konvenciji Europola še ni pričel veljati, ker ga nekatere države članice ne želijo ratificirati?
Will the Council negotiate with the EP the integration of Europol into the EU Treaties, as none of the protocols to the Europol Convention has entered into force because of the reluctance of certain Member States to ratify them?
Se bo Svet vključil v odprto razpravo o posledicah Pogodbe iz Pruma in začel priprave za njeno vključitev v evropski okvir kot obliko okrepljenega sodelovanja?
Will the Council engage in a open debate on the implications of the Treaty of Prüm and launch preparatory work for its integration into the EU framework as enhanced cooperation?
Ali Svet namerava napredovati na področju priseljevanja in azilne politike, predvsem v pogajanjih z Evropskim parlamentom, ki bi pripeljala do sprejetja direktive o vračanju državljanov tretjih držav brez dovoljenja za bivanje, s katero bi se vzpostavili skupni evropski standardi in bi Evropski sklad za vračanje dobil primerno pravno podlago?
Does the Council intend to advance in the field of immigration and asylum policies, with particular reference to the negotiations with the European Parliament for the purpose of adopting the Directive on the return of illegally staying third-country nationals, with a view to establishing common standards at EU level and creating a proper legal basis for the European Return Fund?
Se bo Svet tudi obvezal, da bo istočasno izvajal skupno politiko na področju zakonitega priseljevanja?
Will the Council also undertake to implement at the same time a common legal-immigration policy?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0087/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0087/06
Zadeva: Pravica do zavrnitve sodelovanja v nezakoniti vojni
Subject: Right to refuse to participate in illegal war
Zasedba Iraka ni imela kritja v mednarodnem pravu.
The invasion of Iraq was not covered by international law.
Ni je bilo mogoče upravičiti kot dejanja zakonite obrambe, kot ga opredeljuje Ustanovna listina ZN, in se ni opirala na resolucijo varnostnega sveta ZN.
It could not be defended as an act of legal defence as defined in the UN Charter and it was not mandated by a resolution of the UN Security Council.
Sadam Husein je bil grozovit diktator, vendar njegova vlada ni razpolagala z orožjem za množično uničevanje, pa tudi ni nudila zavetja teroristom, ki so nameravali napasti ZDA ali druge države.
Saddam Hussein was a terrible dictator, but his government did not have weapons of mass destruction, nor was he hosting terrorists to attack the USA or any other country.
Odkar se je začela vojna, je svet priča vojnim operacijam, ki so v nasprotju z zavezujočimi pravili mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, kot so uzakonjeni v ženevski konvenciji in drugje.
Ever since the war started, the world has been confronted with acts of warfare which are in contravention of the binding rules of international humanitarian law as codified in the Geneva Conventions and elsewhere.
Trenutno vse večje število pripadnikov vojaškega osebja, ki bi jih razporeditev oz. dodelitev prisilila v sodelovanje v vojni v Iraku, odklanja razporeditev ali premestitev in je obtoženih "pobega iz vojske ali boja", zato morajo prositi tretje države za azil.
As it stands, an increasing number of military personnel whose deployment or assignment would otherwise force them to contribute to the war in Iraq are refusing to be deployed or redeployed and are accused of 'desertion' and therefore need to ask for asylum in third countries.
V tem okviru:
In this context:
je Svet seznanjen s sklepom nemškega zveznega upravnega sodišča v Leipzigu z dne 21. junija 2005 v primeru majorja Floriana Pfaffa , s katerim je sodišče majorju priznalo pravico, da zaradi ugovora vesti odkloni nekatere ukaze, potem ko je nasprotoval podpori nemške zvezne armade napadu ZDA na Irak, saj bi ta pomenil kršenje mednarodnega prava?
Is the Council aware of the 21 June 2005 decision of the German 'Bundesverwaltungsgericht' in Leipzig in the case of Major Florian Pfaff, which recognised his right to refuse specific orders based on his conscience, after he disagreed with the German Bundeswehr providing support for the US invasion in Iraq because this would violate international law?
ali Svet pripravlja novo zakonodajo, ki bi dopolnjevala Direktivo Sveta št. 2004/83 ES , in bi pripadnikom vojaškega osebja dala pravico, da jih v državah EU priznajo kot begunce, kadar pobegnejo iz "nezakonite vojne"?
Is the Council preparing new legislation as a follow-up to Council Directive 2004/83/EC , to make available to military personnel the right to be recognised as refugees in EU countries in cases where they desert from an 'illegal war'?
katere ukrepe sprejema Svet v okviru evropske varnostne in obrambne politike in njenih misij ter zunaj njih, da bi preprečil zapletanje EU, njenih držav članic in osebja v "nezakonito vojno" in/ali nezakonite operacije?
What measures is the Council undertaking - in and beyond the European Security and Defence Policy and its missions - to prevent the EU, its Member States and its personnel getting involved in an 'illegal war' and/or acts of illegal warfare?
Katere ukrepe pripravlja v okviru priprav in izvajanja misij evropske varnostne in obrambne politike - v sodelovanju z Natom in neodvisno od njega, da bi preprečil, da bi razporejeni pripadniki vojaškega osebja storili - ali bili prisiljeni - storiti dejanja, ki bi lahko predstavljala vojne zločine?
In the preparation and implementation of ESDP-missions, both those in cooperation with NATO and those independently deployed, what measures are being taken to prevent military personnel deployed committing, or being forced to commit, practices which could constitute war crimes?
UL L 304, 30.9.2004, str.
OJ L 304, 30.9.2004, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0088/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0088/06
Zadeva: Odložitev pogajanj o razvojnem načrtu iz Dohe
Subject: Suspension of the negotiations on the Doha Development Agenda (DDA)
Ali Komisija lahko razloži, zakaj ministri za trgovino na srečanju G6 23. in 24. julija v Ženevi niso dosegli soglasja o načinu dostopa do kmetijskih in nekmetijskih trgov in obrazloži njihov posledični sklep, da za nedoločen čas odložijo pogajanja o razvojnem načrtu iz Dohe?
Can the Commission explain the causes of the failure of G6 trade ministers to find an agreement on modalities in agriculture and non-agricultural market access in Geneva on 23-24 July and of the subsequent decision to suspend sine die the negotiations on the DDA?
Ali Komisija lahko oceni trenutno stanje in verjetnost, da se bodo pogajanja o razvojnem načrtu iz Dohe nadaljevala kdaj kasneje?
Can the Commission provide an assessment of the current situation and of the likelihood of the DDA negotiations resuming at a later stage?
Ali Komisija lahko oceni morebitni vpliv odložitve pogajanj na države v razvoju in razloži, če namerava sprejeti kakšno pobudo, da bi nadoknadili priložnosti, ki so jih te države zamudile zaradi omenjene prekinitve?
Can the Commission evaluate the possible impact of the suspension of the DDA on developing countries and explain whether it intends to take any initiative to make up for the loss of opportunities suffered by these countries as a result of this suspension?
Ali Komisija lahko oceni morebitni vpliv odložitve pogajanj o razvojnem načrtu iz Dohe na trgovinsko politiko EU, zlasti kar zadeva načrt dvostranskih in regionalnih pogajanj?
Can the Commission evaluate the possible impact of the suspension of the DDA on EU trade policy, in particular with respect to a programme of bilateral and regional negotiations?
Ali Komisija lahko oceni morebitni vpliv prekinitve pogajanj o razvojnem načrtu iz Dohe na večstranski trgovinski sistem, zlasti kar zadeva delovanje mehanizma za reševanje sporov in bodočo institucionalno reformo STO?
Can the Commission evaluate the possible impact of the suspension of the DDA negotiations on the multilateral trading system, in particular with respect to the operation of the Dispute Settlement Mechanism and a future institutional reform of the WTO?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0089/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0089/06
Zadeva: Preprečevanje naravnih nesreč v Evropi in spopadanje z njihovimi posledicami
Subject: Preventing natural disasters in Europe and dealing with their effects
Poleti 2006 so velike naravne nesreče ponovno prizadele države članice Evropske unije.
In the summer of 2006 European Union Member States have yet again been hit by major natural disasters.
Veliko držav članic so prizadele dolgotrajne in uničujoče suše, ki so občutno zmanjšale pridelek in ogrozile preživetje več milijonov kmetij.
Many Member States have been struck by persistent and debilitating droughts which have significantly lowered crop yields and threatened the survival of millions of farms.
Španijo in Portugalsko so opustošili požari.
Spain and Portugal have been ravaged by fires.
V Srednji Evropi, zlasti na Poljskem, so hudi suši sledile obsežne padavine in poplave.
In Central Europe, particularly in Poland, a serious drought has been followed by torrential rains and flooding.
Glede na vse to, je preprečevanje naravnih nesreč in spopadanje z njihovimi posledicami postalo izredno pomembno za Evropsko unijo.
In view of this, preventing natural disasters and dealing with their effects has become a matter of the utmost importance for the European Union.
Jasno je postalo tudi, da glede na razsežnosti naravnih nesreč trenutne oblike pomoči prizadetim posameznikom in državam niso več ustrezne.
It has also become clear that, given the scale of the natural disasters that have occurred, the current forms of aid provided to the individuals and countries affected are no longer adequate.
Parlament je že raziskal problematiko naravnih nesreč in je sprejel sledeče resolucije:
Parliament has already looked into the issue of natural disasters and has adopted the following resolutions:
Resolucijo z dne 14. aprila 2005 o suši na Portugalskem, Resolucijo z dne 12. maja 2005 o suši v Španiji, Resolucijo z dne 18. maja 2006 o kmetijskih vidikih naravnih nesreč.
resolution of 14 April 2005 on the drought in Portugal, resolution of 12 May 2005 on the drought in Spain, resolution of 18 May 2006 on the agricultural aspects of natural disasters.
V tretjem odstavku Resolucije z dne 12. maja 2005 o suši v Španiji je Parlament od Komisije že zahteval "pospešeno uvedbo pilotskega projekta [...] za vzpostavitev modela zavarovanj na ravni Skupnosti ali mehanizma nadomestil".
In paragraph 3 of the resolution of 12 May 2005 on the drought in Spain, Parliament called on the Commission 'for a swifter launch of the pilot project [...] for establishing a Community insurance regime or compensation mechanism'.
V kateri fazi so priprave Komisije na ta projekt?
What stage has the Commission reached in setting up this project?
Kakšne ukrepe je sprejela, da bi pospešila njegovo izvajanje?
What steps has it taken to speed up its implementation?
Kakšne ukrepe je Komisija sprejela kot odziv na stališča Parlamenta, ki jih je izrazil v Resoluciji z dne 18. maja 2006 o kmetijskih vidikih naravnih nesreč, zlasti v odstavkih 2 in 6, ki opozarjata na potrebo po tem, da Unija prevzame večjo finančno obveznost za spopadanje s posledicami naravnih nesreč?
In connection with the resolution of 18 May 2006 on the agricultural aspects of natural disasters, what measures has the Commission taken in response to the views expressed by Parliament, particularly in paragraphs 2 to 6, which point to the need for the Union to make a greater financial commitment to dealing with the effects of natural disasters?
Kako namerava Komisija povečati učinkovitost sprejetih ukrepov za preprečevanje takih nesreč in spopadanje z njihovimi posledicami, glede na razsežnosti naravnih nesreč v Evropi?
In general, given the scale of the natural disasters occurring in Europe, how will the Commission go about enhancing the effectiveness of action taken to prevent such disasters and deal with their effects?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0090/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0090/06
Zadeva: Taborišča za suženjsko delo na ozemlju EU
Subject: Slave labour camps on EU territory
V minulih dneh je bila javnost na Poljskem v Italiji in drugje globoko pretresena zaradi novice o odkritju taborišča za suženjsko delo v bližini mesta Foggia v Italiji, v katerem je bilo v groznih razmerah zaprtih in prisiljenih k delu več kot sto poljskih delavcev.
Over recent days, the public in Poland, Italy and elsewhere have been deeply shocked by news of the discovery in the vicinity of Foggia in Italy of a slave labour camp in which more than one hundred Polish workers were held under guard in terrible conditions and forced to work.
Več taboriščnikov je storilo samomor in obstaja sum, da jih je bilo nekaj umorjenih.
Several of the camp inmates committed suicide and there are suspicions that some were murdered.
Poročila v poljskih medijih (radijska postaja RMF) navajajo, da obstaja utemeljen sum, da takšna taborišča za suženjsko delo morda obstajajo tudi v drugih državah članicah EU ter da v njih morda pod prisilo delajo ljudje različnih narodnosti.
According to reports in the Polish media (the RMF radio station), there is reason to suspect that similar slave camps may exist in other EU Member States, and that people of various nationalities may be held and forced to work in them.
Parlament se je ob številnih priložnostih postavil v bran zatiranih in obsodil kršitve človekovih pravic v državah izven EU.
Parliament has on numerous occasions taken a stand in defence of the oppressed and denounced human rights violations in countries outside the EU.
Sprejeli smo na stotine takšnih resolucij.
We have adopted hundreds of resolutions of this kind.
Danes smo soočeni z izredno hudo kršitvijo človekovih pravic na ozemlju Evropske unije.
Today, we are faced with an extremely grave instance of human rights violation on European Union territory.
To bi nam moralo odpreti oči.
We should treat this as a wake-up call.
Ne smemo dovoliti, da se v osrčju Evrope nadaljuje sramotno suženjstvo.
We cannot allow the shameful practice of slavery to go on in the heart of Europe.