natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In nenazadnje, ali meni, da so državljani EU ustrezno obveščeni o tej zadevi in če so, s katerimi podatki je to podkrepljeno?
Finally, does it believe that EU citizens are sufficiently informed about this issue and what quantitative data bear this out?
Če niso, ali so potrebni dodatni ukrepi in kakšni so ti ukrepi, ki jih je treba sprejeti?
If not, are further measures needed and what kind of measures should be envisaged?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0430/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0430/09
Zadeva: Ustavitev postopka pritožbe zoper projekt preskrbe združenja za prekope reke Taibilla z vodo iz zajezitvenega jezera Cenajo
Subject: Closure of file on complaint concerning the basic plan for a supply system from the Cenajo reservoir to the Canales del Taibilla water management body
S kakšno pravno utemeljitvijo in na podlagi katerih meril je Komisija zaustavila pravni postopek (SG/CDC(2008)A/822, v katerem se je Isidoro Ruiz Gabaldón v imenu združenj uporabnikov ter namakalnih skupnosti reke Segura in severnega dela njene ravnine pritožil zoper osnovni projekt sistema preskrbe združenja za prekope Taibille z vodo iz zajezitvenega jezera Cenajo?
On what legal grounds and what criteria has the Commission closed the file on complaint No SG/CDC(2008)A/822, lodged by Mr Isidoro Ruiz Gabaldón on behalf of the Juntas Centrales de Usuarios, Regantes del Segura y Norte de la Vega del Rio Segura?
Pritožbi so se pridružile mestne uprave Cieze, Blance, Abarána, namakalne skupnosti ter državljani z 11.000 podpisi.
The complaint concerned the basic plan for a system to supply the Canales del Taibilla water management body with water from the Cenajo reservoir and was supported by the town councils of Cieza, Blanca and Abarán, as well as by the irrigation cooperatives and a petition signed by 11 000 citizens.
Kot je razvidno iz pritožbe, bi speljava reke pod zemljo povzročila neposredno uničenje reke in njenih bregov ter poslabšanje vodnega telesa, kar je kršitev Direktive 2000/60/ES .
As explained in the complaint, the excavation of the river entails destroying the river and its banks and will damage the quality of the water body, in contravention of Directive 2000/60/EC .
Projekt, v katerem niso prikazane drugačne možnosti, tudi ne vsebuje celovite presoje vplivov na okolje ali izravnalnih ukrepov za poravnavo učinkov tega posega.
No alternative options have been included in the plan, the effect on the environment will be complex and no compensatory measures have been proposed to offset the plan’s impact.
Javni razpis je bil objavljen, še preden bi bile take rešitve predvidene.
The tender process began before any such solutions were included.
Poleg tega bi navedeni projekt povzročil izumrtje zaščitenih vrst živali, kot je na primer vidra (Lutra lutra).
Furthermore, the plan threatens protected animals, such as the otter (Lutra Lutra).
1 UL L 327, 22.6.2000, str.
OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0431/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0431/09
Zadeva: Pogajanja o sodelovanju Turčije pri skupnih operacijah agencije Frontex
Subject: Negotiations for Turkey to take part in joint Frontex operations
Cecilia Malmström, ministrica za evropske zadeve predsedujoče države Svetu, je na plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta povedala, da potekajo pogajanja o morebitnem sporazumu, ki bi zajemal tudi izmenjavo informacij in možnost sodelovanja turških oblasti pri skupnih operacijah Frontex.
On 21 October 2009 Ms Malmstöm, President-in-Office of the Council, told the European Parliament meeting in plenary sitting that negotiations were being held 'with a view to a possible agreement which would also cover exchanges of information and the possibility for the Turkish authorities to take part in joint Frontex operations.
V skladu s členom 8e(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 863/2007 o vzpostavitvi mehanizma za ustanovitev skupin za hitro posredovanje na mejah in o spremembah Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2007/2004 se morata izvršni direktor in država članica prosilka strinjati glede vseh sprememb ali prilagoditev operativnega načrta.
Article 8e, paragraph 2, of Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 establishing a mechanism for the creation of Rapid Border Intervention Teams and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 provides that 'any amendments to or adaptations of the operational plan shall require the agreement of both the Executive Director and the requesting Member State.'
Ali bo Svet glede na zgoraj navedeno zaupal, v kateri fazi so razprave o sodelovanju Turčije pri skupnih operacijah agencije Frontex?
In view of the above, will the Council say what stage discussions for Turkish participation in joint Frontex operations have reached?
S kakšnimi zahtevami Turčija pogojuje svoje sodelovanje?
What demands is Turkey making as a condition for its participation?
Ali je Grčija, država članica, ki gosti misijo Frontex, seznanjena s temi razpravami?
Is Greece, a Member State which hosts the Frontex mission, aware of these discussions?
7 UL L 199, 31.7.2007, str.
OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p.30.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0432/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0432/09
Zadeva: Pregled nacionalnega strateškega referenčnega okvira za prilagoditev na krizne razmere
Subject: Review of the National Strategic Reference Framework to adjust to crisis conditions
Svetovna kriza je ustvarila nove potrebe in nove prednostne naloge, tako v proračunski politiki kot pri načrtovanju politik za rast držav članic.
The global crisis has created new needs and new priorities, both in budgetary policy and in planning the growth policies of Member States.
Več držav članic mora zato preoblikovati programe in ukrepe, pa tudi sistem financiranja svojih nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirov.
A fair number of Member States therefore need to replan programmes and actions and also the system for funding their National Strategic Reference Frameworks (NSFRs).
Ali lahko Komisija odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Will the Commission say:
S katerimi predlogi namerava državam članicam, ki želijo posodobiti programe, sofinancirane s strani Evropske unije, olajšati to opravilo?
What proposals is it considering in order to make it easier for Member States that wish to update programmes cofunded by the European Union?
Ali namerava spremeniti finančni okvir nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirov ter tako zmanjšati breme za države članice, ki se zaradi krize povečini soočajo z ogromnimi proračunskimi težavami?
Is it contemplating changes in the financial framework of NSRFs in order to ease the burden on Member States, most of which are facing huge budgetary problems owing to the crisis?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0433/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0433/09
Zadeva: Turčija in Sudan
Subject: Turkey and Sudan
Sudanski predsednik Omar al Bašir naj bi se udeležil zasedanja Organizacije islamske konference, ki je potekalo 9. novembra 2009 v Istanbulu.
The President of Sudan, Omar al-Bashir, is said to have attended a meeting of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Istanbul starting on 9 November 2009.
Mednarodno kazensko sodišče je zanj izdalo mednarodni zaporni nalog na podlagi obtožb vojnih zločinov in zločinov proti človečnosti v Darfurju.
The International Criminal Court has issued an international arrest warrant against al-Bashir on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Darfur.
Varnostni svet Združenih narodov, katerega nestalna članica v obdobju od 2009 do 2011 je tudi Turčija, je v svoji resoluciji 1593 vse države pozval k sodelovanju z Mednarodnim kazenskim sodiščem.
In Resolution 1593, the UN Security Council, whose non-permanent members for the period 2009-2011 include Turkey, called on all States to cooperate with the International Criminal Court.
Turčija ni pogodbenica Rimskega statuta Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, vse države članice Evropske unije pa so.
Turkey is not a contracting party to the Rome Statute of the ICC, but all the EU Member States are.
Kako Komisija ocenjuje turško politiko glede na cilje zunanje politike Evropske unije na področju človekovih pravic, če je bil Omar al Bašir dejansko v Istanbulu in ni bil aretiran?
If Omar al-Bashir was in Istanbul but was not arrested, what view does the Commission take of Turkey's policy in this regard, in the light of the aims of the EU's common foreign policy in the field of human rights?
Kakšne bodo posledice tega za pristopna pogajanja?
What consequences will this have for the accession negotiations?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0434/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0434/09
Zadeva: Pogajanja o podnebnih spremembah v Københavnu
Subject: Climate negotiations in Copenhagen
Ali lahko Svet posreduje najnovejše informacije o pogajanjih, ki naj bi se zaključila v Københavnu?
Can the Council give an update on the negotiations nearing conclusion in Copenhagen?
Ali lahko natančneje pojasni, kdaj bo po njegovih pričakovanjih uveljavljen pravno zavezujoč sporazum, naslednik kjotskega protokola, če tak sporazum ne bo dosežen v Københavnu?
Can it specify, in the absence of a legally binding agreement in Copenhagen, when it expects a legally binding successor to Kyoto to be in place?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0435/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0435/09
Zadeva: Direktiva o blagovnih znamkah (2008/95/ES) in
Subject: Trade Marks Directive (2008/95/EC) and Google AdWords
Generalni pravobranilec Poiares Pessoa Maduro je v nedavnem mnenju za Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti o zadevi Googlovega oglaševalnega programa Adwords zagovarjal stališče, da se na podlagi člena 5 direktive o blagovnih znamkah (2008/95/ES) podjetjem dovoli nakup ključnih besed (Adwords), ki so zaščitene blagovne znamke drugih podjetij.
The recent opinion by Advocate General Poiares Pessoa Maduro for the European Court of Justice on the issue of Google AdWords cases favoured permitting one company to purchase an AdWord which is trademarked by another company, based on Article 5 of the Trade Marks Directive (2008/95/EC ).
To velja za mala in srednje velika podjetja, pa tudi za večja podjetja.
This applies as much to small and medium enterprises as to larger enterprises.
Če podjetje kupi blagovno znamko drugega podjetja, je očitno nepošteno.
The purchasing by one company of another company’s trademark is patently unfair.
Ali je Komisija glede na povedano pripravljena v primernem času predlagati spremembe za posodobitev direktive o blagovnih znamkah, če bo Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti odločilo v prid Googla?
Can the Commission therefore state whether it is prepared to put forward amending proposals in order to update the Trade Marks Directive should the ECJ rule in favour of Google in due course?
20 UL L 299, 8.11.2008, str.
OJ L 299, 8.11.2008, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0436/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0436/09
Zadeva: Sredstva za podnebne spremembe za države v razvoju
Subject: Climate change funding for the developing world
Na bližajočih se pogovorih o podnebnih spremembah v Københavnu naj bi se oblikoval svetovni pristop do podnebnih sprememb na kratek in srednji rok.
The upcoming climate change talks in Copenhagen are set to define global attitudes to climate change in the short to medium term.
Bistvenega pomena je, da se doseže sporazum ter da bogate države zagotovijo denar za posledice podnebnih sprememb v državah v razvoju.
It is crucial that agreement is reached and that rich countries front up the money to pay for the effects of climate change in the developing world.
Ni razumno pričakovati, da bi države v razvoju plačevale za posledice problema, ki ga je povzročil zahodni svet.
We cannot reasonably expect developing countries to pay for the effects of a problem that the Western World has caused.
Po ocenah iz dogovora, doseženega na oktobrskem srečanju Evropskega sveta, naj bi države v razvoju potrebovale 100 milijard EUR za prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam, hkrati pa države v razvoju trdijo, da bodo stroški znašali trikrat ali štirikrat več.
The agreement reached in October at the European Council Summit estimated that developing countries would need EUR 100 billion in order to adapt to climate change, whereas developing countries argue that the cost would be three to four times as much.
Kako namerava Svet doseči kompromis pri tako različnih ocenah?
How does the Council intend to reach a compromise between such disparate figures?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0437/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0437/09
Zadeva: Informacije za državljane o podpori Evropske komisije
Subject: Information for citizens on European Commission support
Volivci me pogosto sprašujejo, ali lahko Evropska komisija zagotovi finančno ali logistično podporo njim ali projektu, v katerega so vključeni.
I am often asked by constituents whether the European Commission can support them or a project they are involved in, either financially or logistically.
Čeprav je na spletnem mestu Komisije državljanom na voljo veliko dobrih informacij, je težko natančno ugotoviti, kako bi jih v tem smislu Komisija lahko podprla.
While there is a lot of good information for citizens on the Commission website, it is difficult to find out exactly what the Commission can or cannot do in terms of supporting citizens in this way.
S katerimi ukrepi bi lahko komisar izboljšal komunikacijo z evropskimi državljani na tem področju?
What steps can the Commissioner take to improve communication with the people of Europe in this area?
Ali sta predvidena oblikovanje spletnega mesta in zagotovitev osebja za obravnavanje tovrstnih vprašanj, kar bi državljanom olajšalo in poenostavilo iskanje podpore Komisije?
Is there scope for a website and staff dedicated to such inquiries and designed to make seeking Commission support as simple and straightforward as possible?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0438/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0438/09
Zadeva: Uničenje kulturne dediščine
Subject: Destruction of the cultural heritage
Vprašanje uničenja kulturne dediščine na okupiranem severnem delu Cipra je zelo pomembno za celotno Evropo.
The issue of the destruction of the cultural heritage in the northern, occupied part of Cyprus is of capital importance for Europe as a whole.
S tem, ko sta bila 2 milijona EUR od skupno 259 milijonov EUR pomoči za okupirana ozemlja predvidena za cerkev matere Božje Odigitrije v Bekistanu, je bil storjen korak v pravo smer.
It is a positive step that EUR 2 million - out the total of EUR 259 million allocated as aid to the occupied territories - have been set aside for the Church of Panagia Odigitria (Bekestan).
Ali se bo Komisija, glede na to, da je na okupiranem delu Cipra veliko pravoslavnih in drugih krščanskih cerkva ter ostalih spomenikov, ki se bodo brez takojšnje obnove zrušili in ostali za vedno izgubljeni, razjasnila o tem, ali namerava še naprej zagotavljati sredstva iz 259 milijonov EUR vrednega proračuna in pospešiti postopek, saj gre vendar za evropsko in svetovno kulturno dediščino.
Since there are a large number of Orthodox and other Christian churches and other monuments in the occupied part of Cyprus, which unless immediately restored will collapse and be lost for ever, will the Commission say whether it intends to continue making available appropriations from the EUR 259 million and to speed up the procedure, since it is the cultural heritage of Europe and the world that is at stake?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0439/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0439/09
Zadeva: Zaznavanje vse večjega obsega gospodarskega kriminala zaradi širitve Evropske unije na vzhod
Subject: Perceived increase in economic crime due to the eastward expansion of the European Union
Glede na zadnjo izdajo letnega indeksa vodilnih menedžerjev Top Manager Index , študije, ki jo skupaj izvedeta družba za svetovanje AT Kearney in Dunajska univerza za ekonomijo in poslovno administracijo, 88% avstrijskih podjetij, vključenih v raziskavo, meni, da obstaja velika možnost, da se bo gospodarski kriminal zaradi širitve Evropske unije na vzhod povečal.
According to the latest edition of the annual Top Manager Index (TMI), a study conducted jointly by the consulting company A.T. Kearney and Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, 88 % of the Austrian companies interviewed considered an increase in economic crime due to the eastward expansion of the European Union highly probable.
Od leta 2003 je odstotek podjetij, ki zaznavajo tako tveganje, ostal skorajda nespremenjen (leta 2008: 87%).
The percentage of companies perceiving this risk has remained stable since 2003 (in 2008: 87%).
Ali je zgoraj navedeno zaznavanje avstrijskih podjetij enako kot zaznavanje Komisije oz. njeno poznavanje tega pojava in – če je tako– ali si bo Komisija prizadevala pripraviti predlog, kako se boriti proti temu pojavu in osnovnim vzrokom zanj?
Does the above mentioned perception of Austrian companies correspond with the Commission's perception/knowledge of this phenomenon, and if so, will the Commission work on a proposal on how to combat this phenomenon and its root causes?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0440/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0440/09
Zadeva: Predlog za direktivo Sveta o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na vero ali prepričanje, invalidnost, starost ali spolno usmerjenost
Subject: Proposal for a Council directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment for persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation
Nadvse pomembno je poudariti splošno zahtevo po dostopnosti za vse, ne samo za invalide, pač pa za večino evropske družbe, v naslednjih 10 letih.
This will bring benefits not only for people with disabilities, but for the majority of people in Europe’s society within 10 years.
Ali bo Svet preučil možnost resnično enotne podlage za protidiskriminacijsko politiko brez izjem (npr. oblikovanje, proizvodnja blaga), s katero bi ustvarili trajnostno družbo in odpravili vrsto različnih pravnih podlag za boj proti diskriminaciji?
Will the Council consider establishing a uniform basis for an anti-discrimination policy, without exemptions (e.g. for the design and manufacture of goods), in order to create a sustainable society and eliminate the hierarchy of legal provisions on combating discrimination?
Ker je dostopnost infrastrukture in storitev v več primerih in državah dejansko precejšen izziv, menim, da je povsem nesprejemljivo za 10 ali 20 let prelagati obvezo za sprejetje novih predpisov za boljšo in dejansko dostopnost (nove) infrastrukture in (novih) storitev na ravni držav članic.
Given that access to infrastructure and services is a very real challenge for many people in many countries, I regard it as totally unacceptable to postpone for 10 or 20 years the imposition on Member States of a requirement to adopt new rules providing for genuine, better accessibility of (new) infrastructure and (new) services.
Ali Svet razmišlja o dodatnem podaljšanju roka za prenos obveze o dostopnosti obstoječe in/ali nove infrastrukture?
Is the Council in any way considering a further extension of the deadline for transposition of the accessibility requirement for existing and/or new infrastructure?
Če da, zakaj?
If so, why?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0441/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0441/09
Zadeva: Napredek pri izvajanju svežnja ukrepov za podnebne spremembe in energijo
Subject: Study of implementation of and proposed measures under the 'energy-climate change' package
V skladu s svežnjem ukrepov za podnebne spremembe in energijo, ki je bil sprejet decembra 2008, morajo države članice do leta 2020 zmanjšati emisije onesnaževal za 20% oz. za 30%, če bo po izteku kjotskega protokola sprejet nov sporazum.
The 'energy-climate change' package adopted in December 2008 calls on the Member States to reduce their polluting emissions by 20% by 2020, and by 30% if a post-Kyoto agreement is concluded.
Do leta 2020 mora 20% porabljene energije prihajati iz obnovljivih virov.
By 2020, 20% of energy consumption should be from renewable sources.
Za uresničitev teh ciljev se morajo zmanjšati emisije onesnaževal v energetsko intenzivnih industrijskih sektorjih, pa tudi v prometnem sektorju in gradbeništvu.
These objectives necessitate the reduction of polluting emissions in energy-intensive industries, as well as in areas such as transport and buildings.
Cilji svežnja ukrepov za podnebne spremembe in energijo zajemajo posodobitev evropskih podjetij ter večjo energetsko učinkovitost v prometnem sektorju in gradbeništvu, kakor tudi geološko shranjevanje ogljika.
The objectives established in the 'energy-climate change' package require the modernisation of European businesses and increased energy efficiency in transport and buildings, as well as geological carbon storage.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0442/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0442/09
Zadeva: Začasna ustavitev sodelovanja ES z Nikaragvo
Subject: Suspension of EC cooperation with Nicaragua
Čeprav je Nikaragva ena najrevnejših držav na svetu, je Evropska komisija sklenila, da bo zaradi domnevnih nepravilnosti na lokalnih volitvah preložila izplačilo zneska 60 milijonov EUR za obdobje 2008–2009.
Although Nicaragua is one of the poorest countries in the world, the European Commission decided to suspend payment of EUR 60 million for the period 2008-2009 because of alleged irregularities in local elections.
Ta sredstva so bila predvidena za izobraževalne in zdravstvene programe, diverzifikacijo proizvodnje in druge namene.
This amount was earmarked for education and health programmes, diversification of production and other purposes.
Ukrep, za katerega se je odločila Komisija, je torej hudo prizadel prav najrevnejše skupine prebivalstva v Nikaragvi.
This measure taken by the Commission has therefore seriously penalised the poorest population groups in Nicaragua.
Komisija je bila nedavno že pripravljena sprostiti 10 milijonov EUR od omenjenega zneska, vendar si je zaradi odločitve nikaragovskega vrhovnega sodišča o ponovni izvolitvi predsednika in županov premislila in sklenila, da sankcije proti Nikaragvi nadaljuje.
Recently the Commission was ready to lift this suspension, releasing EUR 10 million, but now it has decided to continue exercising sanctions against Nicaragua because of the decision of the Nicaraguan Supreme Court on the re-election of the president and the mayors.
Zakaj je Komisija uvedla takšne ukrepe proti Nikaragvi, ne pa tudi proti vladama Kolumbije in Kostarike, kjer so bile sprejete podobne odločitve?
Why did the Commission adopt such measures against Nicaragua, and not against the Governments of Colombia or Costa Rica, where similar decisions were taken?
Ali namerava Komisija odpraviti sankcije proti Nikaragvi in njeni demokratično izvoljeni vladi?
Does the Commission intend to lift the sanctions imposed against Nicaragua and its democratically elected government?
Ali je Komisija ocenila posledice teh ukrepov za najrevnejše skupine prebivalstva v Nikaragvi?
Has the Commission carried out an evaluation of the consequences of these measures for the poorest population groups in Nicaragua?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0443/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0443/09
Zadeva: Oglaševanje alkohola
Subject: Alcohol advertising
Letošnjo pomlad je skupina Science group po naročilu foruma Alcohol and Health Forum predstavila poročilo o vplivu oglaševanja na količino in navade uživanja alkoholnih pijač, zlasti pri mladih ( The impact of marketing communication on the volume and patterns of consumption of alcoholic beverages, especially by young people ).
Last spring, a report was presented by the Science Group at the request of the Alcohol and Health Forum entitled 'The impact of marketing communication on the volume and patterns of consumption of alcoholic beverages, especially by young people'.
Po navedbah poročila dvanajst od trinajstih preverjenih študij kaže, da oglaševanje alkohola vpliva na starost, ko mladi začnejo uživati alkohol, ter na količino pitja pri mladih, ki že uživajo alkohol.
The report reveals that twelve of thirteen studies examined show that alcohol advertising affects the point at which young people start drinking alcohol and persuades those who already drink to increase their consumption.
Študije kažejo tudi, da obstaja neposredna povezava med številom reklam, ki so jim mladi izpostavljeni, in stopnjo povečanja uživanja alkohola.
The studies also show that there is a direct link between how much advertising young people are exposed to and how much they increase their consumption.