natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Skušnjave po zaprtju notranjih meja ali ignoriranju položaja držav članic, ki se neposredno soočajo z migracijskimi tokovi, so refleksne reakcije.
The temptation to close internal borders or to ignore the situation of Member States directly affected by the migration flows are ‘knee-jerk’ answers.
Preprosta, dolgoročna in celostna rešitev ne obstaja.
There is no simple long-term, comprehensive solution.
Potrebujemo pa odgovoren, učinkovit in usklajen nadzor nad zunanjimi mejami EU ter usklajen azilni sistem EU, ki bo priznaval medsebojno odvisnost.
What is needed is responsible, efficient and coordinated control of the EU’s external borders, together with a coherent EU asylum system recognising interdependence.
Dosedanji dogodki kažejo, da je čas za demonstracijo odgovornosti in solidarnosti.
What has happened has demonstrated that it is time for both responsibility and solidarity to be shown.
To vključuje skupno azilno politiko s skupnimi postopki za odobritev mednarodne zaščite.
This includes a common asylum policy with common procedures for granting international protection.
– Kaj namerava Svet storiti za spodbujanje solidarnosti EU z državami članicami, ki so na frontni črti migracijske problematike, ter skupnega upravljanja zunanjih meja EU?
– what does the Council intend to do in order to promote EU solidarity with Member States which are in the front line of the migration problem, as well as common management of the EU’s external borders?
– Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti vzpostavitev skupnega azilnega sistema EU do leta 2012, kot je bilo obljubljeno?
– what does the Council intend to do to ensure that the EU common asylum system becomes a reality by 2012 as promised?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000094/2011
Question for oral answer O-000094/2011
Skušnjave po zaprtju notranjih meja ali ignoriranju položaja držav članic, ki se neposredno soočajo z migracijskimi tokovi, so samodejni odzivi brez razmisleka.
The temptation to close internal borders or to ignore the situation of Member States directly affected by the migration flows are ‘knee-jerk’ answers.
– Ali lahko Komisija obrazloži, ali so kontrole na meji med Francijo in Italijo pri Ventimiglii upravičene?
– can the Commission indicate whether the controls at the borders between France and Italy near Ventimiglia are justified?
– Ali lahko Komisija navede, ali so dovoljenja za začasno bivanje, ki jih podeljuje Italija, skladna s schengenskimi predpisi in ali dejansko omogočajo prosto gibanje po schengenskem območju?
– can the Commission indicate whether the temporary residence permits issued by Italy are in conformity with the Schengen rules and if they do indeed allow free movement inside the Schengen area?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000095/2011
Question for oral answer O-000095/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Celovita strategija EU o sporih zaradi naravnih virov
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: A comprehensive EU strategy on conflicts on natural resources
Letni akcijski program iz leta 2011 za krizno pripravljenost v okviru instrumenta za stabilnost (člen 4(3)) vsebuje predlog ukrepov za okrepitev zmogljivosti lokalnih nedržavnih akterjev, da bi bolje razumeli in reševali spore zaradi naravnih virov.
The 2011 Annual Action Programme of the crisis-preparedness component of the Instrument for Stability (IfS) (Article 4(3)) includes a proposal for action to strengthen the capacity of local non-state actors to better understand and resolve natural resource conflicts.
Vendar ti ukrepi očitno niso usklajeni na ravni EU.
It seems however that this particular action is not coordinated at EU level.
Zaenkrat še ni celovite strategije EU o sporih zaradi naravnih virov niti zavezujočega kodeksa ravnanja ali pravil za poročanje o dejavnostih v tretjih državah.
To date, neither a comprehensive EU strategy on conflict over natural resources nor any binding code of conduct or reporting rules for activities in third countries exist.
To je zelo v nasprotju z zakonodajo v ZDA (Dodd-Frankov zakon), Kanadi, na Norveškem in v Hong Kongu, po kateri morajo zasebna podjetja razkriti zneske in prejemnike plačil za naravne vire.
This stands in stark contrast with legislation in the US (Dodd-Frank bill), Canada, Norway and Hong Kong that requires private companies to disclose the amount and the recipients of payments made in exchange for natural resources.
To pomanjkanje preglednosti v tretjih državah spodbuja korupcijo in spore.
This lack of transparency fosters corruption and conflict in third countries.
Nedavno poročilo organizacije Transparency International kaže, da je zelo malo večnacionalnih podjetij razkrilo svoja plačila državam gostiteljicam, pri čemer ni niti eno podjetje EU razkrilo svojih transferjev libijskemu režimu.
A recent report by Transparency International shows that very few multinational companies disclose their payments to host governments with, for example, not a single EU company having revealed its transfers to the Libyan regime.
Kako namerava Komisija vključiti predlagani projekt v okviru instrumenta za stabilnost v splošni pristop EU k sporom in naravnim virom?
How does the Commission intend to integrate the proposed IfS project into an overall EU approach to conflict and natural resources?
Kdaj bo podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica z Evropsko službo za zunanjepolitično delovanje ob sodelovanju s Komisijo predložila celovito strategijo EU o sporih in naravnih virih, vključno z ustreznim zavezujočim kodeksom ravnanja za tiste, ki delujejo v tretjih državah, in zlasti za projekte, ki jih financira EU, in sicer prek Evropske investicijske banke ali Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj?
When will the Vice-President/High Representative, with the EEAS and in cooperation with the Commission, present a comprehensive EU strategy on conflicts and natural resources, including an appropriate and binding code of conduct for those operating in third countries and especially for projects receiving EU funding, such as from the EIB or through the EBRD?
Ali Komisija namerava v svoj predlog o meddržavnem poročanju, ki bo objavljen kasneje letos, vključiti pravilo o obveznem razkritju plačil v tretje države?
Does the Commission intend to include mandatory disclosure rules for payments to third countries in its proposal on country-to-country reporting to be published later this year?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000096/2011
Question for oral answer O-000096/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Kriza na področju ribištva zaradi povišanja cene goriv
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Crisis in the fisheries sector arising from higher fuel prices
Velik porast cen nafte je močno poslabšal krizo, s katero se spopada ribiški sektor v več državah Evropske unije.
The sharp rise in oil prices has led to a significant worsening of the crisis facing the fisheries sector in a number of EU Member States.
V zadnjih šestih mesecih, med septembrom 2010 in marcem 2011, je cena sodčka nafte tipa Brent narasla za več kot 47 %.
In the last six months alone, between September 2010 and March 2011, the Brent barrel price has risen by more than 47%.
Krizi na področju prihodkov, ki je v sektorju nastala že zaradi nizkih cen za prvo prodajo rib, se je pridružilo veliko povišanje cene dejavnikov proizvodnje (v nekaterih primerih je bila ta ovira nepremostljiva).
The crisis already affecting incomes in the sector as a result of low initial sales prices for fish has now been compounded by the significant (and in some cases even unsupportable) increase in the cost of factors of production.
Jasno je, da so razmere zaskrbljujoče, saj so zaradi njih številni ribiči in lastniki prenehali dejavnost, gospodarske in socialne razmere v številnih ribiških skupnostih pa so se poslabšale.
The situation is frankly disturbing, with some fishermen and vessel owners ceasing activities and a consequent worsening of economic and social conditions in various fishing communities.
Strukturne težnje pri dvigu cene nafte (ker je je vedno manj) lahko v bližnji prihodnosti naknadno poslabšajo obstoječo krizo, zaradi česar je treba sprejeti posebne ukrepe za ta sektor.
The structural tendency for oil prices to rise (thanks to the progressive and inevitable depletion of resources) could, in the near future, make the present crisis even worse.
Katere nujne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi podprla ribiški sektor in se soočila z velikim tveganjem, ki ga predstavlja velik dvig cene goriv?
What emergency measures will the Commission adopt to support the fisheries sector in the face of the grave crisis arising from the sharp rise in fuel prices?
Katere dodatne ukrepe namerava Komisija še sprejeti ob strukturnih težnjah k dvigu cene nafte, da bi zagotovila srednje- in dolgoročno trajnost sektorja ob upoštevanju njegove velike raznolikosti po različnih državah članicah EU?
What other measures will the Commission adopt in the face of the structural tendency for oil prices to rise, with a view to ensuring the sustainability of the sector in the medium and long term and taking account of the great variations characterising the sector as between Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000097/2011
Question for oral answer O-000097/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Odziv na pritok ljudi iz severne Afrike in južnega Sredozemlja
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Response to the influx from North Africa and the Southern Mediterranean
Italijanska vlada je nedavno podpisala odredbo, s katero upravnim organom dovoljuje, da 25.800 tunizijskim migrantom, ki so prispeli v Italijo, podelijo dovoljenje za začasno bivanje, iz katerih je lahko sklepati, da zajemajo tudi pravico do prostega gibanja.
The Italian Government recently signed a decree allowing the authorities to issue temporary residence permits to the 25 800 Tunisian migrants that have arrived in Italy, giving the impression of the right to free movement.
Zaradi tega je več držav članic ponovno postavilo obmejni nadzor, kar je ogrozilo načelo prostega gibanja, ki je bistveno za schengenski sporazum ter prihodnost skupnega evropskega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
This has caused several Member States to reinstate border controls, thus endangering the principle of free movement, which is the cornerstone of the Schengen Agreement, and jeopardising the future of a common EU area of freedom, security and justice.
Ali lahko, glede na to, da ukrepi držav članic povzročajo pritisk na solidarnost tako do sosednjih držav kakor v Evropski uniji, Svet pojasni:
Given that these moves by Member States put solidarity both towards neighbouring countries, and within the EU, under pressure can the Council clarify:
– Ali bo podprl sklicevanje na direktivo o začasni zaščiti?
– Will it support the evocation of the Temporary Protection Directive?
– Kakšen je nadomestni predlog Sveta, da bi se preprečil zlom schengenskega sistema, kar bi ogrozilo načelo prostega gibanja znotraj Evropske unije?
– What is the Council’s alternative proposal to prevent the breakdown of the Schengen system jeopardising the principle of free movement within the EU?
– Kaj namerava Svet storiti glede premestitve beguncev v Evropsko unijo in med različnimi državami članicami, sploh kar zadeva prosilce, ki zahtevajo mednarodno zaščito?
– What does the Council intend to do as regards the relocation of refugees in the EU and between the different Member States, particularly those requiring international protection?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000098/2011
Question for oral answer O-000098/2011
Italijanska vlada je nedavno podpisala odredbo, s katero upravnim organom dovoljuje, da približno 25 800 tunizijskim migrantom, ki so prispeli v Italijo, podelijo dovoljenje za začasno bivanje, iz katerih je lahko sklepati, da zajemajo tudi pravico do prostega gibanja.
The Italian Government recently signed a decree allowing the authorities to issue temporary residence permits to the approximately 25 800 Tunisian migrants that have arrived in Italy, giving the impression of the right to free movement.
Ali lahko, glede na to, da ukrepi držav članic povzročajo pritisk na solidarnost tako do sosednjih držav kakor v Evropski uniji, Komisija pojasni:
Given that these moves by Member States put solidarity both towards neighbouring countries, and within the EU, under pressure can the Commission clarify:
– Zakaj se je odločila, da se ne bo sklicevala na direktivo o začasni zaščiti?
– Why it has decided not to evoke the Temporary Protection Directive?
– Ali lahko Komisija pove, ali so dovoljenja za začasno bivanje, ki jih podeljuje Italija, skladna s schengenskimi predpisi in ali dejansko omogočajo prosto gibanje po schengenskem območju?
– Can the Commission say whether the temporary residence permits issued by Italy are in conformity with the Schengen rules and if they do indeed allow free movement inside the Schengen area?
– Kakšen je nadomestni predlog Komisije, da bi se preprečila zlom schengenskega sistema, kar bi ogrozilo načelo prostega gibanja znotraj Evropske unije?
– What is the Commission’s alternative proposal to prevent the breakdown of the Schengen system jeopardising the principle of free movement within the EU?
– Kaj namerava Komisija storiti glede premestitve beguncev v Evropsko unijo in med različnimi državami članicami, sploh kar zadeva prosilce, ki zahtevajo mednarodno zaščito?
– What does the Commission intend to do as regards the relocation of refugees in the EU and between the different Member States, particularly those requiring international protection?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000099/2011
Question for oral answer O-000099/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Odzivi držav članic na migracijske tokove in položaj beguncev
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Member States' answers to the migration flows and the refugee situation
Prejšnji teden je Francija na meji z Italijo (v bližini mesta Ventimiglia) uvedla mejno kontrolo in blokirala železniški promet, potem ko je italijanska vlada podpisala odredbo, s katero upravnim organom dovoljuje, da 25 800 tunizijskim migrantom, ki so po padcu svojega režima prispeli na otok Lampedusa, podelijo dovoljenje za začasno bivanje.
Last week France instituted border controls and blocked train traffic at the border with Italy (near Ventimiglia) after the Italian Government signed a decree allowing the authorities to issue temporary residence permits to the 25 800 Tunisian migrants who have arrived in Lampedusa since the fall of the regime.
Spor med Francijo in Italijo glede priseljevanja ima in bi utegnil še imeti škodljive posledice za svobodo gibanja na ozemlju EU.
The dispute on migration between France and Italy has had and might have damaging consequences for freedom of movement within the EU.
Medtem se razmere v Severni Afriki ne izboljšujejo in na tisoče beguncev še vedno ne more zapustiti Libije, kjer je izjemno nevarno.
In the meantime, the situation in North Africa is not getting easier and thousands of refugees are still stuck in Libya in an extremely dangerous situation.
EU in njene države članice morajo v takih razmerah bolj sodelovati in poiskati konkretne rešitve, ki bodo v prvi vrsti v interesu ranljivih ljudi.
The EU and its Member States must tackle such situations in a more cooperative way, aiming at real solutions in the interest – first of all – of vulnerable people.
– Kako namerava Svet v luči potekajočega zakonodajnega postopka v zvezi z mehanizmom ocenjevanja schengenskega pravnega reda zagotoviti dosledno spoštovanje določb o odpravi kontrol na notranjih mejah?
– With a view to the ongoing legislative procedure concerning an evaluation mechanism for the Schengen aquis, how does the Council intend to ensure that the provisions on the abolition of checks at the internal borders are fully respected?
– Kako namerava Svet spodbujati odprtje humanitarnega koridorja, po katerem bi begunce iz Libije evakuirali in jih namestili v EU?
– What does the Council intend to do in order to promote the opening of a humanitarian corridor that would evacuate refugees from Libya and resettle them in the EU?
– Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti, da bo postopek soodločanja za namestitev hitro odobren ter, bolj splošno, da bo do leta 2012 vzpostavljen skupni azilni sistem EU?
– What does the Council intend to do to ensure that the resettlement co-decision is urgently approved and, more in general, that the EU common asylum system becomes a reality by 2012?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000100/2011
Question for oral answer O-000100/2011
Italija je tudi pričela s postopkom vračanja nekaj sto tunizijskih državljanov, čeprav pred vračanjem niso dobili pravice do odvetnika (ki bi jim svetoval glede njihovih pravic) ali sodnika (ki v skladu z italijansko zakonodajo odloča o njihovem izgonu).
Italy has also started repatriation procedures for some hundreds of Tunisian nationals, even though they have not been given the right to see either a lawyer (who would inform them of their rights) or a judge (who under Italian law should decide on expulsions) before being returned.
Na Lampedusi dejansko ni nobenega pravosodnega organa.
Indeed, there is no judicial body on the island of Lampedusa.
– Ali Komisija meni, da se z nedavnimi ukrepi francoske obmejne policije krši zakonik o schengenskih mejah?
– Regarding recent actions taken by French border police, would the Commission consider that the Schengen Borders Code is being infringed?
– Ali Komisija meni, da so postopki vračanja beguncev z Lampeduse v Tunizijo, ki so se začeli 5. aprila 2011, zakoniti ter v skladu z načelom nevračanja in pravico do azila?
– Does the Commission consider that return procedures from Lampedusa to Tunisia taking place after 5 April 2011 are lawful and respectful of the non-refoulement principle and of the right to ask for asylum?
– Ali namerava Komisija spodbujati odprtje humanitarnega koridorja, po katerem bi begunce iz Libije evakuirali in jih namestili v EU, in pri tem odprtju sodelovati?
– Does the Commission intend to promote and cooperate on the opening of a humanitarian corridor that would evacuate refugees from Libya and resettle them in the EU?
– Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da bo postopek soodločanja za namestitev hitro odobren ter, bolj splošno, da bo do leta 2012 vzpostavljen skupni azilni sistem EU?
– What does the Commission intend to do to ensure that the resettlement co-decision is urgently approved and, more in general, that the EU common asylum system becomes a reality by 2012?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000101/2011
Question for oral answer O-000101/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Kriza v evropskem ribiškem sektorju zaradi porasta cen nafte
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: European fisheries sector crisis due to rise in oil prices
V zadnjih dveh letih je porast cen nafte močno obremenil operativne stroške v ribiškem sektorju.
Over the preceding two years, the rise in the price of oil has heavily impacted operating expenses in the fisheries sector.
Cena nafte danes znaša več kot 100 USD za sod, medtem ko je bilo treba še na začetku leta 2009 zanj odšteti 37 USD.
The price of oil has increased from USD 37 in early 2009 to more than USD 100 today.
Nestanovitnost cen nafte pa se bo zaradi politične nestabilnosti na območju Magreba in Srednjega vzhoda še povečala.
Moreover, the political instability in the Maghreb and the Middle East is leading to increased instability of oil prices.
Zaradi tega se ribiči soočajo s težavami pri financiranju svojih ribiških dejavnosti, pri čemer morajo nekateri med njimi z opravljanjem te dejavnosti celo prenehati.
Due to this situation, fishermen have difficulties in financing their fishing activities and some even have to cease their activities.
Nadaljevanje takšnih razmer utegne imeti dramatične posledice za evropsko ribiško dejavnost.
A continuation of this situation would have dramatic consequences for European fishing activities.
Evropska unija mora podpreti evropski ribiški sektor, ki je že utrpel posledice uvoza ribogojnih in ribolovnih izdelkov na evropski trg iz tretjih držav.
The EU has to support the European fisheries sector, which is already suffering from imports of aquaculture and fishery products from third countries to the European market.
Prag de minimis je prenizek, da bi obvaroval evropski ribiški sektor.
The de minimis ceiling is too low to safeguard the European fisheries sector.
Ali bi bilo možno zgornjo mejo pomoči de minimis dvigniti s 30 000 EUR na 60 000 EUR na podjetje za obdobje treh let?
Would it be conceivable to raise the de minimis aid ceiling from €30 000 to 60 000 per firm for the three-year period?
Katere druge konkretne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi evropski ribiški industriji glede na porast cen nafte pomagala in jo podprla pri zagotavljanju srednje- in dolgoročnega trajnostnega razvoja tega sektorja?
What other concrete measures is the Commission planning to adopt to help and support the European fishing industry in the context of rising oil prices to ensure medium- and long-term sustainability of the sector?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000102/2011
Question for oral answer O-000102/2011
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Kriza v evropskem ribiškem sektorju zaradi zvišanja cen nafte
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Crisis in the European fisheries sector owing to higher oil prices
Zadnji dve leti so se cene nafte zelo dvignile, kar močno povečuje operativne stroške v ribiškem sektorju.
For two years, the sharp increase in oil prices has had a severe impact on operating expenses in the fisheries sector.
Cena sodčka se je od leta 2009 do danes dvignila s 37 na 100 dolarjev.
The price of a barrel has risen from $US 37 in early 2009 to over $US 100 today.
Poleg tega so cene zaradi politične nestabilnosti v Magrebu in na Bližnjem vzhodu zelo nestanovitne.
Furthermore, political instability in the Maghreb and the Middle East has resulted in great price volatility.
Unija mora podpirati evropski ribiški sektor, ki je že v težavah zaradi velikega deleža ribiških proizvodov in proizvodov ribogojstva, uvoženih na evropski trg iz tretjih držav.
The EU has a duty to support a European fishing industry which is already struggling to cope with the high share of fishery and aquaculture products imported to the European market from third countries.
Zgornja meja pomoči de minimis je prenizka za ohranjanje evropskega ribištva.
The de minimis ceiling is too low to protect European fisheries.
Ali je mogoče zvišati zgornjo mejo pomoči de minimis s 30.000 na 60.000 EUR na podjetje za obdobje treh let?
Is it possible to increase the ceiling for de minimis aid by raising it from €30 000 to €60 000 per company per three year period?
Kako namerava Komisija na splošno podpirati evropsko ribiško gospodarstvo ob upoštevanju omenjenega zvišanja cen nafte?
More generally, how does the Commission intend to support the European fisheries economy against this background of rising oil prices?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000103/2011
Question for oral answer O-000103/2011
Zadeva: Jedrska varnost v sosednjih državah EU
Subject: Nuclear safety in the EU neighbourhood
Jedrska tragedija na Japonskem je seveda sprožila pomisleke o varnosti obstoječih in prihodnjih jedrskih elektrarn.
The nuclear tragedy in Japan has triggered obvious concerns over the safety of existing and future nuclear power plants.
Svet je 25. marca 2011 sprejel sklep, da bo EU tudi na mednarodni ravni spodbujala uporabo najvišjih standardov za jedrsko varnost ter od sosednjih držav zahtevala izvedbo „stresnih testov“ za obstoječe in načrtovane elektrarne.
The Council concluded on 25 March 2011 that the EU will also promote internationally the highest standards for nuclear safety and will request neighbouring countries to carry out ‘stress tests’ on existing and planned plants.
Trenutno se načrtuje gradnja dveh jedrskih elektrarn v bližini meja EU.
Two nuclear power plants (NPPs) are currently planned in close proximity to the EU’s borders.