natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kako namerava Komisija doseči svoj cilj, tj. do leta 2020 zagotoviti dejavnosti usposabljanja za polovico pravnih strokovnjakov v EU ter njihovo dejansko udeležbo v ponujenih programih usposabljanja?
How does the Commission envisage achieving its objectives of ensuring that half of EU legal professionals are offered training activities by 2020 and that they effectively participate in the training offered?
S katerimi ukrepi namerava okrepiti mrežo izobraževalnih organov na področju prava po vsej Uniji ter optimalno izkoristiti nacionalne in evropske izobraževalne ustanove pri organizaciji rednih in stalnih tečajev za spoznavanje nacionalne, primerjalne in evropske zakonodaje za sodnike, tožilce in druge pravne strokovnjake, obenem pa premagati ovire, ki nastanejo zaradi tega (čas, ki ga usposabljanje terja od sodnikov, potreba po usmerjeni uporabi skromnih finančnih sredstev, potreba po razvijanju jezikovnih znanj in/ali večjezikovnih orodij)?
What steps does it intend to take to strengthen the network of legal training bodies across the Union and to make optimum use of national and European training institutions so as to provide familiarisation courses in national, comparative and EU law for judges, prosecutors and other legal professionals on a stable and ongoing basis, while overcoming the inherent difficulties (demands on judges’ time, need for the targeted use of scarce funds, need to develop language skills and/or multilingual training tools)?
Kako namerava Komisija glede na svoj predlog o novem pravosodnem programu okrepiti vlogo obstoječih ponudnikov usposabljanja in njihovih mrež, da bi jim omogočila, da po svojih močeh prispevajo k doseganju ciljev stockholmskega programa?
How does the Commission intend to strengthen the role of existing training providers and networks in the context of its proposal for a new Justice Programme in order to enable them to contribute fully to achieving the objectives of the Stockholm Programme?
Kako namerava Komisija izkoristiti Parlament, ki želi imeti proaktivno vlogo pri določanju politike izobraževanja pravosodnih organov, pa tudi pri snovanju in organizaciji predlaganega pilotnega projekta?
How does the Commission intend to take advantage of Parliament’s wish to play a proactive part, not only in determining judicial training policy, but also in shaping the organisation of the proposed pilot project?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000060/2012
Question for oral answer O-000060/2012
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Kriminalizacija brezdomcev na Madžarskem
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: The criminalisation of homeless persons in Hungary
Na Madžarskem je 1. decembra 2011 začel veljati zakon o kriminalizaciji brezdomcev.
On 1 December 2011 a law on the criminalisation of homeless persons entered into force in Hungary.
Brezdomce, ki živijo na cesti, bodo enkrat opozorili, nato pa jih bodo kaznovali s 445 EUR ali pa aretirali.
After a first warning, homeless persons sleeping in the streets will be fined EUR 445 or imprisoned.
Poročevalci Sveta ZN za človekove pravice o izjemni revščini in človekovih pravicah in o pravici do ustrezne nastanitve so kritizirali zakon in pozvali Madžarsko, naj ponovno pretehta to zakonodajo ter sprejme nacionalno stanovanjsko strategijo, ki bo upoštevala potrebe in pravice brezdomcev ter izpolnjevala mednarodne obveznosti na področju človekovih pravic.
The UN Human Rights Rapporteurs on extreme poverty and human rights and on the right to adequate housing have criticised the law and called on Hungary to reconsider this legislation and to adopt a national housing strategy, which will take into account the needs and rights of the homeless in conformity with international human rights obligations.
Po ocenah je na Madžarskem med 30.000 in 35.000 brezdomcev, vključno z invalidnimi osebami .
There are an estimated 30 000 to 35 000 homeless persons in Hungary, including people with disabilities .
Zaradi gospodarske in finančne krize se je povečalo število družin, ki živijo na cesti.
The economic and financial crises have resulted in a growing number of families living in the streets.
Madžarske oblasti poročajo, da so bila zgrajena nova zavetišča, kritiki pa poudarjajo, da to ne opravičuje kaznovanja ali aretacije tistih, ki kljub temu ne najdejo zavetišča.
Hungarian authorities report that new shelters have been built, but critics underline that this does not justify the fine or imprisonment of those who can still not find a shelter.
Ali Svet prav tako meni, da zgoraj omenjeni zakon ni združljiv s temeljnimi vrednotami Evropske unije, zapisanimi v členu 2 PEU, torej da „Unija temelji na vrednotah spoštovanja človekovega dostojanstva, svobode, demokracije, enakosti, pravne države in spoštovanja človekovih pravic, vključno s pravicami pripadnikov manjšin...v družbi, ki jo označujejo pluralizem, nediskriminacija, strpnost, pravičnost, solidarnost ter enakost žensk in moških“?
Will the Council state whether it shares the view that the abovementioned law is incompatible with the founding values of the European Union, as enshrined in Article 2 TEU, in particular ‘respect for human dignity, freedom, equality, respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities...in a society in which ... non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality’ prevail?
Ali se strinja s tem, da zakon ni združljiv z Listino EU o temeljnih pravicah, predvsem s členom 1 (pravica do dostojanstva), členom 4 (prepoved mučenja in nečloveškega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja), členom 6 (pravica do svobode in varnosti) in členom 7 (spoštovanje zasebnega in družinskega življenja), pa tudi s členom 31 revidirane Evropske socialne listine, ki zagotavlja pravico do nastanitve?
Does it agree that it is incompatible with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, in particular Article 1 (right to dignity), Article 4 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 6 (right to liberty and security) and Article 7 (respect for private and family life), as well as with Article 31 of the revised European Social Charter, which provides for a right to housing?
Ali se strinja s tem, da zakon ni združljiv s politiko Evropske unije na področju boja proti brezdomstvu, vključno s posebno omembo v skupnem poročilu o socialni zaščiti in socialni vključenosti za leto 2010, ki ga je sprejel Svet?
Does it agree that it is incompatible with European Union policies on fighting homelessness, including the specific reference in the 2010 Joint Report on Social Protection and Social Inclusion adopted by the Council?
Ali se strinja s tem, da gre za ukrep, ki ni prestal preizkusa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice o sorazmernosti in nujnosti v demokratični družbi?
Does it agree that it is a measure that fails to stand the ECtHR’s test of proportionality and necessity in a democratic society?
Ali se strinja s tem, da ima zakon diskriminatorni učinek za tiste, ki živijo v revščini?
Does it agree that it has a discriminatory impact on those living in poverty?
Ali se strinja s tem, da se zaradi tega zakona sredstva porabljajo za policijske dejavnosti, pridržanje, kazenski pregon in zapor, namesto da bi se učinkoviteje namenila za stanovanjske rešitve?
Does it agree that it results in resources being spent on policing, detention, prosecution and incarceration, instead of being more efficiently used on housing solutions?
Ali bo posredoval statistične podatke o brezdomstvu v državah članicah?
Will it provide statistics for homelessness in all the Member States?
Če je enakega mnenja, kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti zoper madžarske oblasti in ali bo zoper Madžarsko sprožil postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev?
If it shares these concerns, what action will it take vis-à-vis the Hungarian authorities, and will it open infringement proceedings against Hungary?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000061/2012
Question for oral answer O-000061/2012
Ali Komisija prav tako meni, da zgoraj omenjeni zakon ni združljiv s temeljnimi vrednotami Evropske unije, zapisanimi v členu 2 PEU, torej da „Unija temelji na vrednotah spoštovanja človekovega dostojanstva, svobode, demokracije, enakosti, pravne države in spoštovanja človekovih pravic, vključno s pravicami pripadnikov manjšin...v družbi, ki jo označujejo pluralizem, nediskriminacija, strpnost, pravičnost, solidarnost ter enakost žensk in moških“?
Will the Commission state whether it shares the view that the abovementioned law is incompatible with the founding values of the European Union, as enshrined in Article 2 TEU, in particular ‘respect for human dignity, freedom, equality, respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities...in a society in which ... non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality’ prevail?
Ali bo posredovala statistične podatke o brezdomstvu v državah članicah?
Will it provide statistics for homelessness in all the Member States?
Če je enakega mnenja, kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti zoper madžarske oblasti in ali bo zoper Madžarsko sprožila postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev?
If it shares these concerns, what action will it take vis-à-vis the Hungarian authorities, and will it open infringement proceedings against Hungary?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000062/2012
Question for oral answer O-000062/2012
Leta 2008 je skupina švedskih lastnikov podjetij vložila peticijo (št. 0901/2008), v kateri je navedla, da so njenim članom grozili in jih ustrahovali, ker niso želeli podpisati kolektivnih pogodb, ki so jih sklenili švedski sindikati.
In 2008 a group of Swedish business owners submitted a petition (0901/2008) in which it indicated that its members had been threatened and intimidated because they declined to subscribe to collective agreements concluded by Swedish trade unions.
Pobudniki peticije so poudarili, da njihova podjetja izpolnjujejo vse pravne zahteve in da ponujajo enake, če ne celo boljše, delovne pogoje kot druga podjetja.
The petitioners pointed out that the businesses in question complied with all legal requirements and offered working conditions which were as good as, or better than, elsewhere.
Prav tako trdijo, da so švedski sindikati v tej zadevi nesorazmerno strogi in da je svoboda nezdruževanja pravica posameznika, ki je povsem enakovredna svobodi združevanja.
The petitioners argue that trade unions in Sweden are taking a disproportionately hard line and that freedom of non-association is an individual right equal in weight to the freedom of association.
- Ali se Komisija strinja, da je negativna svoboda združevanja temeljna in absolutna pravica v okviru pogodb in preostalih ustreznih konvencij in sporazumov, ki so obvezujoči za države članice EU?
- Does the Commission agree that the negative freedom of association is a fundamental and absolute right under the Treaties and other relevant conventions and agreements that are binding upon EU Member States?
- Ali v zvezi s svobodo nezdruževanja meni, da je švedska zakonodaja o delovnih razmerjih popolnoma v skladu s črko in duhom pogodb in preostalih ustreznih konvencij in sporazumov, ki so obvezujoči za države članice EU?
- With regard to the freedom of non-association, does the Commission believe that the Swedish labour relations legislation is fully in line with the letter and the spirit of the Treaties and other relevant conventions and agreements that are binding upon EU Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000063/2012
Question for oral answer O-000063/2012
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Poenostavitev vizumskih postopkov za študente iz južnega Sredozemlja
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Visa facilitation for southern Mediterranean students
Protestna gibanja v južnem Sredozemlju je podprla dinamična mlajša generacija, ki je izrazila konkretne zahteve in želje, med katerimi je tudi pravica do kakovostnega izobraževanja.
The protest movements in the southern Mediterranean have been supported by a dynamic younger generation which has expressed concrete demands and aspirations that include the right to a quality education.
Komisija je večkrat povedala, da je pripravljena podpreti akademske izmenjave s sosednjimi državami EU.
The Commission has repeatedly expressed a willingness to promote academic exchanges with the EU’s neighbouring countries.
S pomočjo projekta Erasmus za države Euromeda se lahko EU odzove prav na zahtevo po izobraževanju in mobilnosti.
The Erasmus project for Euromed countries gives the EU the opportunity to respond specifically to this demand for education and mobility.
Vendar pa akademske izmenjave niso možne brez izdaje vizuma, s tem povezani postopki pa so lahko dolgotrajni in razmeroma dragi.
However, academic exchanges are conditional upon the granting of visas, the procedures for which can be lengthy and rather expensive.
Kaj namerava narediti Komisija, da bi poenostavila izdajo vizumov za študente iz južnega Sredozemlja?
What does the Commission intend to do in order to facilitate the granting of visas for students from the southern Mediterranean?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000064/2012
Question for oral answer O-000064/2012
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: dostop so strukturnih skladov za mala in srednja in podjetja
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: SMEs' access to structural funds
Številna evropska mala in srednja podjetja se spopadajo s težavo, kako priti do zadostnega in ustreznega kapitala, da bi razširila in razvila svojo dejavnost.
Access to sufficient and adequate capital to grow and further develop their activities is a difficulty faced by many European SMEs.
Sedanji okvir kohezijske politike si to težavo prizadeva rešiti zlasti s pomočjo posebnih podpornih instrumentov, kot sta JEREMIE in JASMINE.
The current Cohesion Policy framework seeks to address this problem, notably through special support instruments such as JEREMIE and JASMINE.
Vendar pa nedavna študija Evropskega parlamenta o vplivu in učinkovitosti strukturnih skladov in politik EU, namenjenih malim in srednjim podjetjem v regijah, kaže, da obstoječi instrumenti niso dovolj ciljno usmerjeni, saj ne razlikujejo med različnimi vrstami malih in srednjih podjetij.
However, a recent EP study on the ‘impact and effectiveness of structural funds and EU policies aimed at SMEs in the regions’ suggests that existing instruments are not targeted enough, since they do not distinguish between different types of SMEs.
Poleg tega je študija pokazala, da imajo mala in srednja podjetja različne težave, kot so upravno breme, povezano z zahtevami vloge, poročanja in revizije, potreba po predhodnem financiranju projektov in nezadostna usklajenost pravil med skladi in programi.
The study also identifies several concerns among SMEs, e.g. the administrative burden of application, reporting and auditing requirements, the necessity to pre-finance projects and the lack of harmonised rules across funds and programmes.
Tudi spremljanje uspešnosti kohezijske politike, povezane z malimi in srednjimi podjetji, je zaradi pomanjkanja podatkov precej šibko.
Furthermore, performance monitoring of Cohesion Policy related to SMEs is found to be rather weak owing to a lack of data.
Ali bo Komisija sprostila zahteve glede tega, da morajo mala in srednja podjetja svoje projekte financirati vnaprej ?
Will the Commission relax the requirements for SMEs to pre-finance their projects?
Ali namerava Komisija poenostaviti sistem JEREMIE (v povezavi s holdinškimi skladi) in ga sprostila za mala in srednja podjetja?
Does the Commission intend to simplify the set-up of JEREMIE (related to the holding funds) and ease JEREMIE for SMEs?
Kako bo Komisija prispevala k temu, da bodo omenjena podjetja lažje dostopala do strukturnih skladov?
How will the Commission contribute to easing access to structural funding for SMEs?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bo financiranje teh podjetij bolj ciljno usmerjeno, zlasti ob upoštevanju njihove raznolikosti?
How will the Commission ensure that the funding of SMEs is better targeted, especially taking into account the heterogeneity of SMEs?
Kako bo Komisija poskrbela za boljšo uporabo in oceno podatkov za spremljanje, povezanih s financiranjem malih in srednjih podjetij s strukturnimi in kohezijskimi skladi?
How will the Commission ensure better use and evaluation of monitoring data related to the funding of SMEs through structural and cohesion funds?
Ali si bo Komisija bolj prizadevala za zagotovitev posebnega zagonskega financiranja za mlade podjetnike?
Will the Commission put more emphasis on providing specific seed financing for young entrepreneurs?
Ali bo Komisija podprla oblikovanje zmogljivosti za financiranje malih in srednjih podjetij?
Will the Commission support capacity building for SME funding?
Kako namerava Komisija odpraviti vrzel med finančnimi potrebami teh podjetij in ciklusi javnih razpisov?
How will the Commission address the gap between SMEs’ financial needs and the cycles of calls for tender?
Ali namerava Komisija zmanjšati svoje zahteve po sofinanciranju, povezane s programi EU, namenjenimi malim in srednjim podjetjem (kot so kohezijska politika, 7. okvirni program, program za konkurenčnost in inovacije, pametna energija)?
Is the Commission planning to reduce its co-financing requirements regarding the EU-financed programmes targeting SMEs (i.e. Cohesion Policy, FP7, CIP, Intelligent Energy)?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000065/2012
Question for oral answer O-000065/2012
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Biometrični potni listi
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Biometric passports
Leta 2004 sprejeta Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2252/2004 o standardih za varnostne značilnosti in biometrične podatke v potnih listih in potovalnih dokumentih, ki jih izdajo države članice, je bila pomemben korak za zagotovitev varnejših potnih listov ter za vzpostavitev zanesljivejše povezave med potnimi listi in njihovimi imetniki, s čimer naj bi bila zagotovljena večja varnost pred zlorabami potnih listov in potovalnih dokumentov.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States was adopted in 2004 as an important step towards making travel documents more secure, and in order to establish a more reliable link between passports and their holders, ensuring better protection against fraudulent use.
Evropski parlament je med naknadnim pregledom uredbe leta 2008 opozoril, da je še vedno zelo malo izkušenj pri uporabi teh novih tehnologij in da še vedno obstajajo pomisleki glede:
During the subsequent revision, in 2008, the EP drew attention to the fact that there was still not very much experience in the use of these new technologies and that too many concerns remained regarding:
– zanesljivosti in uporabnosti prstnih odtisov otrok in starejših oseb,
– the reliability and usefulness of fingerprints taken from children and the elderly;
– ravni zaupanja v postopek zbiranja biometričnih podatkov,
– the level of confidence in the process of collecting the biometric data;
– morebitnih pomanjkljivosti v sistemih identifikacije in stopenj napak v posameznih državah članicah ter
– the possible shortcomings in identification systems and the error rates existing in the various Member States;
– različnih dokumentov, ki jih je treba predložiti za pridobitev potnega lista, in načina izdaje teh dokumentov (po angleško t.i. breeder documents ).
– the existing disparities regarding the documents that must be submitted and the way in which these documents are issued (the ‘breeder documents’).
Zato je bila uvedena klavzula o ponovnem pregledu vsaka tri leta, da bi omogočili izvedbo potrebnih študij (ki jih je Parlament zahteval za posamična področja).
A three-year revision clause was therefore introduced in order to allow the necessary studies (requested by the EP in each of these areas) to take place.
Ali lahko Komisija pove, če so že na voljo rezultati omenjenih študij?
Could the Commission say whether the results of the studies requested are already available?
Ali namerava ponovno oceniti pravila glede na težave v več državah članicah?
Is the Commission considering re-evaluating the rules, given the problems that appear to exist in a number of Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000067/2012
Question for oral answer O-000067/2012
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Trgovina z ljudmi
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Trafficking in human beings
Trgovina z ljudmi spada med najhujše in najbolj razširjene oblike kaznivega dejanja v globaliziranem svetu.
Trafficking in human beings is one of the most alarming and widespread forms of crime in the globalised world.
Direktiva 2011/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. aprila 2011 o preprečevanju trgovine z ljudmi in boju proti njej ter zaščiti njenih žrtev in o nadomestitvi Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/629/PNZ je velik dosežek in izjemen primer dobrega medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja.
Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA , is a great achievement and an excellent example of good interinstitutional cooperation.
Naslednji korak bi moral biti nemoten prenos direktive v predvidenem roku ter sprejetje nove, ambiciozne, celovite strategije za boj proti trgovini z ljudmi s poudarkom na človekovih pravicah.
The next step should be a smooth and timely transposition of the Directive, together with the adoption of a new, ambitious, human-rights-centred and holistically oriented strategy to combat trafficking in human beings.
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti pravočasno in učinkovito izvajanje direktive?
How is the Commission intending to ensure that the directive is implemented in a timely and effective manner?
Zlasti, kako namerava zagotoviti:
Specifically, how does it intend to ensure that:
- dosleden prenos v nacionalno zakonodajo, predvsem določb o kaznivih dejanjih, ki bi jih bilo treba prenesti v nacionalno zakonodajo, da bi bile čim lažje izvedljive, ter določb o zasegu in zaplembi;
- transposition into national law is consistent, especially with regard to provisions concerning criminal offences – which should be transposed into national law so as to make them as easy as possible for practitioners to apply – and provisions on seizure and confiscation;
- učinkovito nudenje podpore, pomoči in zaščite žrtvam, zlasti otrokom;
- assistance, support and protection are effectively provided to victims, with special attention being paid to children;
- sprejetje praktičnih preventivnih ukrepov, zlasti za preprečevanje tveganj, povezanih z internetom in lažnim predstavljanjem (angl. phishing ), ter za preprečevanje povpraševanja, vključno z oceno ukrepov, sprejetih v skladu s členom 18(4) Direktive 2011/36/EU;
- practical preventive action is taken, notably with regard to the dangers linked to the internet and to web ‘phishing’ and from the point of view of discouraging demand, including by assessing measures taken under Article 18(4) of Directive 2011/36/EU;
- vzpostavitev funkcije nacionalnega poročevalca ali enakovrednih mehanizmov, ki bodo zagotovili zahtevane rezultate iz člena 19 direktive, predvsem pa zbirali podatke in poročali koordinatorju EU za boj proti trgovini z ljudmi, Komisiji in Evropskemu parlamentu;
- national rapporteurs or equivalent mechanisms are established and deliver the results required under Article 19 of the directive, in particular as regards data collection and reporting to the Anti-Trafficking Coordinator, the Commission and the European Parliament;
- da bo lahko koordinator za boj proti trgovini z ljudmi čim bolje izvajal svoje zahtevne naloge ter da bo užival čim širšo logistično in kadrovsko podporo in čim večjo neodvisnost?
- the Anti-Trafficking Coordinator is in the best position to fulfil her challenging tasks, and receives the widest possible support where logistics, staff and independence are concerned?