natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če menite, da je situacijski center ustrezen, lahko prosim pojasnite razloge, ki so vas spodbudili, da ste ustvarili mesto koordinatorja za boj proti terorizmu?
If the SITCEN is considered to be appropriate, could you explain the reasons that have incited you to create the post of Coordinator for the fight against terrorism?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0035/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0035/07
Zadeva: Vzpostavitev enotnega evropskega neba s funkcionalnimi bloki zračnega prostora (KOM(2007)0101 končno)
Subject: Building the Single European Sky through functional airspace blocks (COM(2007)0101final)
Komisija je v sporočilu pojasnila, da znašajo stroški zaradi neuspešnega oblikovanja enotnega evropskega neba s funkcionalnimi bloki zračnega prostora milijardo eurov.
The Commission makes clear in its Communication that the cost of failing to create a Single European Sky through functional airspace blocks amounts to € 1 billion.
Je Komisija zadovoljna z napredkom pri oblikovanju enotnega evropskega neba od začetka veljave Uredbe (ES) št. 551/2004 o organiziranosti in uporabi zračnega prostora aprila 2004?
Is the Commission satisfied with the progress made in creating a Single European Sky since the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 on airspace organisation in April 2004?
Zakaj po mnenju Komisije vse od začetka veljave Uredbe (ES) št. 551/2004 noben nov funkcionalni blok zračnega prostora ni postal operativen?
Why, in the Commission's view, have no new functional airspace blocks become operational since Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 came into force?
Člen 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 551/2004 o organiziranosti in uporabi zračnega prostora določa, naj se organiziranost in uporaba zračnega prostora razširita na spodnji zračni prostor, in zahteva, da Komisija „glede na doseženi napredek“ po potrebi določi druge ukrepe.
Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 on the organisation of airspace foresees an extension of airspace organisation to the lower airspace and requires the Commission to 'determine any other steps' that might be necessary 'in the light of progress achieved'.
Katere spremembe veljavne zakonodaje so glede na zgornje ugotovitve potrebne, da se pospeši vzpostavitev enotnega evropskega neba?
In view of that what changes are now required to existing legislation to accelerate the creation of a Single European Sky?
Se Komisija strinja, da nima smisla čakati do konca leta 2008 in da je sedaj pravi čas za pripravo ustreznega predloga?
Does the Commission agree that it is pointless to wait until the end of 2008 and that it is time now to bring forward a proposal in this direction?
Se Komisija strinja glede neuspešnosti pristopa od spodaj navzgor, ki je pobudo za oblikovanje funkcionalnih blokov zračnega prostora prepustil državam članicam, in glede tega, da je potreben bolj proaktiven pristopu na ravni EU?
Does the Commission agree that the 'bottom up' approach, whereby the initiative to create functional airspace blocks is left to the Member States, has failed and that a new, more pro-active approach at EU level is now required?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0036/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0036/07
Zadeva: Sporazum TRIPs in dostop do zdravil
Subject: TRIPS Agreement and access to medicines
Sklep Svetovne trgovinske organizacije z dne 30. avgusta 2003 naj bi bil "hitra rešitev" za težave z dostopom do zdravil, s katerim se soočajo države v razvoju, ki so brez proizvodnih zmogljivosti ali jih imajo malo.
The WTO Decision of 30 August 2003 was supposed to be an 'expeditious solution' to the crisis in access to medicines faced by developing countries with no or little manufacturing capacity.
Predlog spremembe sporazuma TRIPs ne upošteva dejstva, da učinkovitost sklepa ni dokazana.
The amendment to the TRIPS Agreement disregards the fact that there is no proof of the Decision's efficacy.
Evropski parlament mora sedaj dati soglasje.
The European Parliament has now to give its assent.
Ali lahko Svet v zvezi s tem:
In this context, could the Council:
poda mnenje o mehanizmu, ki sta ga vzpostavila sklep Svetovne trgovinske organizacije z dne 30. avgusta 2003 in protokol k sporazumu TRIPs, ter ob doslej omejeni uporabi mehanizma razišče možnosti za izboljšanje njegove učinkovitosti;
Give its views on the mechanism created by the WTO Decision of 30 August 2003 and the Protocol to the TRIPS Agreement and, given the restricted use of the mechanism so far, explore the possibilities to improve its efficiency;
z Evropskim parlamentom sprejme skupno politično izjavo, da so potrebni drugi načini, zlasti možnosti za uporabo določbe člena 30 o izvzetju sporazuma TRIPs, ki bi ga lahko uporabljale države ali skupine držav, da bi našle uspešne rešitve težav z dostopom do zdravil po dostopnih cenah;
Adopt a Joint Policy Statement with the European Parliament on the necessity to find alternative ways, in particular the possibility to use the Article 30 exception provision of the TRIPS Agreement, which could be used by countries or groups of countries to find viable solutions to the problem of access to medicines at affordable prices;
se obveže, da bo omejil pooblastilo Komisiji z namenom, da se ne razpravlja o določbah, povezanih z zdravili po sporazumu TRIPs–plus, ki vplivajo na javno zdravje in dostop do zdravil v sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu z afriškimi, karibskimi in pacifiškimi državami ter drugih prihodnjih dvostranskih in regionalnih sporazumih z revnimi državami v razvoju;
Commit to restricting the mandate to the Commission in order not to negotiate pharmaceutical-related TRIPS-plus provisions affecting public health and access to medicines in the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with the ACP countries and other future bilateral and regional agreements with poor developing countries;
izjavi, da Evropska unija podpira države v razvoju, ki uporabljajo tako imenovane prožnosti, ki so vgrajene v sporazum TRIPs, z namenom zagotavljati pomembna zdravila po dostopnih cenah z domačimi programi javnega zdravja;
State that the European Union supports the developing countries which use the so-called flexibilities built into the TRIPS Agreement in order to be able to provide essential medicines at affordable prices under their domestic public health programmes;
priznava, da mora Evropska unija nujno sprejeti dodatne ukrepe z namenom spodbujanja prenosa tehnologije, raziskav, krepitev zmogljivosti, regijskih oskrbovalnih sistemov in pomoč pri registraciji, da bi olajšali in povečali proizvodnjo farmacevtskih izdelkov s strani samih držav v razvoju.
Recognise that the European Union must take additional measures as a matter of urgency with a view to encouraging the transfer of technology, research, capacity strengthening, regional supply systems and help with registration, in order to facilitate and increase the production of pharmaceutical products by the developing countries themselves?
Če ne, ali lahko Svet pojasni, zakaj?
If not, can the Council explain why not?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0037/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0037/07
Ali lahko Komisija v zvezi s tem:
In this context, could the Commission:
izrazi mnenje o pomenu tega, da se ne razpravlja o določbah, povezanih z zdravili po sporazumu TRIPs–plus, ki vplivajo na javno zdravje in dostop do zdravil v okviru sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu z afriškimi, karibskimi in pacifiškimi regijami ter drugih prihodnjih dvostranskih in regionalnih sporazumov z revnimi državami v razvoju;
Express its view on the importance of not negotiating pharmaceutical-related TRIPS-plus provisions affecting public health and access to medicines in the framework of the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with the ACP countries and other future bilateral and regional agreements with poor developing countries;
pojasni, katere so po njenem mnenju nove in realne rešitve, ki bi jih lahko uporabljale države ali skupine držav, da bi našle uspešne in dolgotrajne rešitve težav z dostopom do zdravil po dostopnih cenah in bi pospeševale neposredne naložbe v zmogljivosti lokalne proizvodnje v regiji;
Explain which are in its view new and realistic solutions that could be used by countries or groups of countries to find viable and long lasting solutions to the problem of access to medicines at affordable prices and stimulate direct investment in local production facilities within a region;
pojasni, na kakšen način namerava podpreti delo medvladne delovne skupine za javno zdravje, inovacije in postopek intelektualne lastnine pri Svetovni zdravstveni organizaciji;
Explain by which means it intends to support the work of the Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property process at the WHO;
določi pošteno/ustrezno raven financiranja za posodobitev ali izgradnjo zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo zdravil pri lokalnih lastnikih v državah v razvoju (vključno z najmanj razvitimi) ter poveča skupno financiranje javno–zasebnega partnerstva v prizadevanju za raziskave in razvoj zdravil, ki so posebej pomembna za države v razvoju".
Define a fair/adequate level of funding to upgrade or construct pharmaceutical production facilities owned by local persons in developing (including least developed) countries, and increase its aggregate funding to public private partnerships pursuing research and development of medicines of special relevance to developing countries?
Če ne, ali lahko Komisija pojasni, zakaj?
If not, can the Commission explain why not?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0038/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0038/07
Zadeva: Poročilo o dejavnosti EURESa za obdobje 2004-2005: skupnemu evropskem trgu dela naproti
Subject: EURES Activity Report 2004-2005: Towards a single European labour market
Po novih integriranih smernicah za rast in zaposlovanje za obdobje 2005–2008 je mobilnost bistvena za uspeh prenovljene lizbonske strategije.
Under the new Integrated Economic and Employment Guidelines 2005-2008, mobility is considered a crucial instrument for the success of the Revised Lisbon Strategy.
Poleg tega smernice za politiko zaposlovanja držav članic, ki so bile sprejete julija 2005, še bolj poudarjajo pomen mobilnosti.
Moreover, the Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States of July 2005 put an even greater emphasis on mobility.
V smernici št. 20 je mobilnost opredeljena kot osrednjega pomena za to, da bi več ljudi našlo boljšo zaposlitev, vsebuje pa tudi zahteve za odstranitev "ovir za mobilnost delavcev v Evropi znotraj okvira pogodb".
Guideline No 20 specifies that mobility is central to allowing more people to find better employment and calls for the removal of ‘obstacles to mobility for workers across Europe within the framework of the treaties’.
Evropski parlament je odobril povečanje proračunske postavke za storitve evropske službe za zaposlovanje za leto 2007 v višini 2 milijona EUR, da bi se spodbudilo izvajanje in delovanje mreže EURES.
The European Parliament adopted a EUR 2 million increase in the European Employment Services budget line for 2007, aimed at furthering the implementation and operation of the EURES network.
Po uspešnem zaključku evropskega leta 2006 mobilnosti delavcev se je precej povečal obisk portala EURES za zaposlitveno mobilnost.
The successful conclusion of the 2006 European Year of Workers’ Mobility, led to a significant increase in the consultation of the EURES Job Mobility Portal.
Ta portal mora postati pomembna evropska platforma za komuniciranje različnih akterjev na trgu dela, na kateri bodo delavci, ki so geografsko in zaposlitveno mobilni, našli "vse na enem mestu", njen cilj pa je odpraviti obstoječe ovire (zlasti v zvezi z vprašanji glede socialne varnosti).
The EURES portal should become an important European labour market communications platform – a one-stop shop for workers’ geographic and occupational mobility, aimed at removing existing obstacles (especially in work-related social security questions).
Ali namerava Komisija razširiti vsebino portala EURES, da bo zajemal tudi potrebe državljanov iz tretjih držav, saj bo zaradi demografskih sprememb v Evropski uniji za izpolnitev potreb trga dela EU verjetno potreben bolj stalen pritok priseljencev?
Does the Commission intend to extend the content of the EURES portal in order to address the needs of nationals from third countries, since, given the demographic changes within the EU, more sustained immigration flows are likely to be increasingly required to meet the needs of the EU labour market?
Ali namerava Komisija glede na večjo razpoznavnost EURESa zahvaljujoč evropskemu letu zagotoviti tudi dostop do prostih delovnih mest in informacij o ponudbah dela za sezonske in začasne zaposlitve, saj je namen povišanja proračunskih sredstev tudi financiranje ukrepov za obveščanje sezonskih delavcev v državah članicah izven njihovih matičnih držav?
As a result of the increased visibility acquired by EURES in the context of the European Year, does the Commission intend to provide access to job vacancies and information on job offers for seasonal or short-term workers, since the budget increase is also intended to fund measures to provide information for the seasonal workers in Member States other than their countries of origin?
Ali namerava Komisija podpirati in spodbujati večjo geografsko in poklicno mobilnost delavcev kot sredstvo za boljše delovanje evropskega trga dela?
How does the Commission intend to support and promote further the geographic and occupational mobility of workers as a means to improving the functioning of the labour market in Europe?
Ali namerava Komisija uporabiti rezultate raziskav in najboljše prakse, pridobljene v okviru projektov EURES, kot je "EURES v čezmejnih regijah", da bi spodbudila prosto gibanje vseh evropskih državljanov, in države članice spodbudila, naj odpravijo prehodne ukrepe v zvezi s prostim pretokom delovne sile?
Does the Commission intend to use research results and best practices gained in EURES projects, such as ‘EURES in crossborder regions’, to further the free movement of all European citizens and urge the Member States to lift the transitional measures concerning free movement of labour?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0039/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0039/07
Zadeva: Vloga EU na Kosovu
Subject: The EU's role in Kosovo
Sredi marca 2007 je posebni odposlanec ZN Martti Ahtisaari generalnemu sekretarju ZN predstavil celovit predlog dogovora o statusu Kosova, ta pa ga je posredoval varnostnemu svetu ZN.
In mid-March 2007 UN Special Envoy Martti Ahtisaari presented his Comprehensive Proposal for the Kosovo Status Settlement to the UN Secretary-General, who forwarded it to the UN Security Council.
Izvedba tega načrta predvideva okrepljeno vlogo Evropske unije.
This plan foresees an enhanced role for the European Union with regard to its implementation.
Mednarodni civilni urad bi moral prevzeti mesto Začasne misije Združenih narodov na Kosovu (UNMIK), ki se trenutno umika.
The International Civilian Office (ICO) should take the place of UNMIK which is currently being phased out.
Vodja tega urada bi moral biti tudi posebni predstavnik EU za Kosovo.
The head of the ICO should also be the EU Special Representative for Kosovo.
Planska misija EU za Kosovo (EUPT) že več mesecev pripravlja novo misijo EU, ki bo temeljni steber mednarodnega civilnega urada.
An EU Planning Team (EUPT) has been working for months to prepare the new EU mission that will be the founding pillar of the ICO.
Danes je zaradi odpora Rusije, ki grozi z uporabo veta, zelo malo verjetno, da bo varnostni svet ZN sprejel novo resolucijo, ki bi nadomestila njegovo resolucijo št. 1244 (1999).
As things stand it is very unlikely that the UN Security Council will adopt a new resolution replacing UNSC 1244 (1999) owing to the resistance of Russia, which is threatening to use its veto.
Svet je izjavil, da misije EU na Kosovu ne more biti brez nove resolucije varnostnega sveta ZN.
The Council has stated that without a new UNSC resolution there cannot be an EU mission in Kosovo.
Pozneje je predsedstvo EU, zato da bi preseglo zastoj, govorilo o mogočih prehodnih oblikah ureditve za prisotnost EU na Kosovu.
Lately, in order to overcome the stalemate, the EU presidency spoke of possible interim arrangements for the EU presence in Kosovo.
Kako namerava Svet ukrepati v primeru, da varnostni svet ZN ne bo sposoben preseči zastoja?
How does the Council intend to act should the UN Security Council be unable to break the deadlock?
Kako bo porabljen denar EU, ki je že dodeljen za Kosovo?
How will the EU money already allocated for Kosovo be spent?
Ali lahko Svet pove, katere dele misije EU je mogoče izpeljati v vsakem primeru?
Can the Council say which parts of the EU mission can be carried out in any case?
Ali obstaja načrt B, po katerem se ravna Svet, da bi presegel sedanji položaj?
Is there a plan B upon which the Council is working in order to overcome the present situation?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0040/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0040/07
Danes je zaradi odpora Rusije, ki grozi z uporabo veta, zelo malo verjetno, da bo varnostni svet ZN sprejel novo resolucijo, ki bi nadomestila njegovo resolucijo 1244 (1999).
As things stand it is very unlikely that the UN Security Council will adopt a new resolution replacing UNSC 1244 (1999) owing to the resistance of Russia, which is threatening to use its veto.
Kako namerava Komisija ukrepati v primeru, da varnostni svet ZN ne bo sposoben preseči zastoja?
How does the Commission intend to act should the UN Security Council be unable to break the deadlock?
Ali lahko Komisija pove, katere dele misije EU je mogoče izpeljati v vsakem primeru?
Can the Commission say which parts of the EU mission can be carried out in any case?
Ali obstaja načrt B, po katerem se ravna Komisija, da bi presegla sedanji položaj?
Is there a plan B upon which the Commission is working in order to overcome the present situation?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0041/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0041/07
Zadeva: Napotitev delavcev
Subject: Posting of workers
V direktivi 96/71/ES o napotitvi delavcev v okviru zagotavljanja storitev je 16. december 1999 rok, določen za prenos določb direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo.
Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services set 16 December 1999 as the deadline for transposition of its provisions into national law.
Vendar se je ustrezno izvajanje direktive kmalu izkazalo za težavno zaradi pomanjkljivosti besedila, pomanjkanja temeljitega izvajanja v državah članicah in usklajevanja med njihovimi pristojnimi organi.
Soon, appropriate implementation of the Directive proved to be problematic due both to insufficiencies inherent in the text and the lack of proper implementation in the Member States and coordination among their competent authorities.
Evropski parlament meni, da reviziji direktive, ki ju je Komisija izvedla leta 2003 in leta 2006, ne zadostujeta .
The reviews of the Directive by the Commission in 2003 and 2006 were considered insufficient by the European Parliament .
Komisija se je v svojih sporočilih "Smernice o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev" in "Napotitev delavcev zaradi opravljanja storitev – čim boljši izkoristek prednosti in možnosti ob hkratnem zagotavljanju zaščite delavcev" obvezala, da bo sprejela potrebne ukrepe za ureditev razmer, ki so posledica pomanjkanja skladnosti z ustreznimi določbami prava Skupnosti in/ali odsotnosti sodelovanja med državami članicami v okviru člena 4 (sodelovanje pri obveščanju) in člena 5 (izvršilni ukrepi držav članic) direktive.
In its Communications 'Guidance on the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services' and 'Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services: maximising its benefits and potential while guaranteeing the protection of workers' , the Commission committed itself to take the necessary steps to rectify the situation created by any lack of compliance with the relevant provisions of Community law and/or cooperation between Member States under Articles 4 (cooperation on information) and 5 (enforcement measures by Member States) of the Directive.
Kako namerava Komisija obravnavati zaskrbljenost, ki jo je Evropski parlament izrazil v svojih resolucijah, zlasti glede:
How does the Commission intend to address the concerns expressed by the European Parliament in its resolutions, in particular with regard to:
hranjenja dokumentov na delovnem mestu, da bi nadzorovali skladnost z direktivo, in
the keeping of documents at the workplace to control compliance with the Directive, and
prisotnosti zakonitega predstavnika podjetja, ki je delavca napotilo na delo, da bi izpolnili pravne zahteve v državi članici gostiteljici?
the presence of a posting company legal representative in order to fulfil legal requirements in the host Member State?
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se direktiva uporablja vsaj od decembra 1999 in da je Komisija več kot pred letom dni objavila smernice o obveznostih držav članic v primeru napotitve na njihovo ozemlje,
In view of the fact that the Directive applies at least from December 1999 and that guidelines explaining to Member States their obligations with regard to postings that take place on their territory were published by the Commission more than one year ago:
ali bo Komisija objavila jasnejše, natančnejše smernice, da bi olajšala državam članicam in podjetjem boljše razumevanje tega, kar jim direktiva omogoča, in boljše razumevanje ustrezne sodne prakse?
Will the Commission publish clearer, more detailed, guidelines to help Member States and companies to have a better understanding of what they are allowed to do under the Directive and the relevant case-law?
Če bo, kdaj bo to storila?
If so, when?
ali je Komisija ocenila, katere države članice še vedno ne izpolnjujejo določb direktive, zlasti glede sodelovanja pri obveščanju in izvršilnih ukrepov?
Has the Commission assessed which Member States still fail to comply with the provisions of the Directive, in particular concerning cooperation on information and enforcement measures by Member States?
Ali Komisija lahko potrdi, da bo v zvezi z napotitvijo spoštovala vse modele trgov dela, ki obstajajo v Evropski uniji?
Can the Commission confirm that, in the framework of posting, it will respect all labour market models existing in the European Union?
UL L 18, 21.1.1997, str.
OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p.
KOM(2007)0304 končno s 13.6.2007.
COM(2007)0304 final of 13.6.2007.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0042/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0042/07
Evropska družba v zasebni lasti
A. European Private Company
V svoji resoluciji P6_(2007)0023 (na podlagi člena 192(2) PES) s 1. februarja 2007 je Evropski parlament od Komisije zahteval, da v letu 2007 predloži zakonodajni predlog na podlagi člena 308 PES o statutu evropske družbe v zasebni lasti.
In its resolution P6_(2007)0023 (based on Article 192 paragraph 2 EC) of 1 February 2007, the European Parliament requested the Commission to submit during 2007, on the basis of Article 308 EC, a legislative proposal on the Statute of a European Private Company (EPC).
Zahteva odraža načrt Komisije, da bo sestavila zakonodajni predlog za evropsko družbo v zasebni lasti med leti 2006 in 2008, kot je to določeni v sporočilu "Posodobitev prava gospodarskih družb in izboljšanje upravljanja podjetij" (KOM(2003)0284 končno).
This request mirrors the Commission's own plan to come up with a legislative proposal for an EPC between 2006 and 2008 as stated in its Communication 'Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance' (COM(2003)0284 final).
V skladu z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom s 26. maja 2005 Komisija upošteva vsako zahtevo na podlagi člena 192 PES in nanjo hitro in dovolj podrobno odgovori.
According to the Interinstitutional Agreement signed on 26 May 2005, the Commission shall take account of any request made pursuant to Article 192 EC, and shall provide a prompt and sufficiently detailed reply thereto.
Štirinajsta direktiva na področju prava družb (prenos statutarnega sedeža)
B. Fourteenth Company Law Directive (transfer of registered office)