natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Katere ukrepe lahko Komisija predlaga, da bi državam v razvoju pomagala ohraniti gozdove ob spoštovanju avtohtonih prebivalcev?
What steps can the Commission propose to support developing countries in preserving forests whilst respecting the needs of indigenous communities?
Katere mednarodne prožne mehanizme, ki temeljijo na izvirnosti projektov in ne sodijo k razvojni pomoči, mehanizmom čistega razvoja ter mehanizmoma REDD in REDD+, bi lahko ponudila?
What kind of international, flexible mechanism based on project originality could the Commission bring forward, outside the spheres of development aid, clean development mechanisms, REDD and REDD+?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0192/2010
Question for oral answer O-0192/2010
Zadeva: Mednarodne posvojitve v Evropski uniji
Subject: International adoption in the European Union
Problem zapuščenih otrok je v Evropi vse resnejši in vse bolj pereč.
In Europe the problem of abandoned children has become increasingly serious and pressing.
Za reševanje tega nujnega vprašanja je treba zaščititi pravico do mednarodnih posvojitev, da ti otroci ne bi bili prisiljeni živeti v sirotišnicah.
To cope with this emergency it is important to protect the right to adopt at international level in order to prevent these children from being forced to live in orphanages.
Imamo že številne konvencije o zaščiti mladoletnikov in starševski odgovornosti.
Currently there are many conventions on the protection of minors and parental responsibility.
Cilj evropske konvencije o posvojitvi otrok iz leta 1967 je uskladiti zakonodajo držav članic, kadar gre za posvojitev otroka, ki se bo preselil iz ene države v drugo.
The 1967 European Convention on the Adoption of Children aims to harmonise the laws of Member States when the adoption involves a child having to move from one state to another.
Poleg tega obstaja še konvencija o varstvu otrok in sodelovanju pri meddržavnih posvojitvah iz leta 1993.
There is also the 1993 Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in respect of Intercountry Adoption.
Z začetkom veljave Lizbonske pogodbe je postala zavezujoča Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Charter of Fundamental Rights has become binding; Article 24 states: ‘Children shall have the right to such protection and care as is necessary for their well-being’.
Člen 24 listine pravi: „Otroci imajo pravico do potrebnega varstva in skrbi za zagotovitev njihove dobrobiti.“ Poleg tega je v členu 3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji kot eden od ciljev Unije navedeno „varstvo pravic otrok“.
Furthermore, Article 3 of the Treaty establishes ‘protection of the rights of the child’ as one of the aims of the Union.
Zato sprašujemo Svet, ali lahko:
Can the Council therefore:
– pripravi pregled stanja v 27 državah članicah?
– provide an overview of the situation in the 27 Member States?
– pove, kakšni ukrepi so bili sprejeti ali bodo sprejeti na evropski ravni za zaščito mladoletnikov, ki jih bodo posvojili evropski državljani?
– tell us what measures have been taken or will be taken at European level to protect minors who are to be adopted by European citizens?
– ponazori, kako bodo ti postopki zagotovili, da bodo vedno zastopane otrokove koristi, ki so določene z mednarodnimi pogodbami in konvencijami?
– illustrate how these procedures will ensure that the best interest of the child, as enshrined in various international treaties and conventions, is always protected?
– poda informacije o tem, kako namerava v interesu otrok zaščititi pravico do mednarodnih posvojitev v Evropski uniji?
– provide information on how it intends to protect, in the interests of the child, the right to international adoption within the European Union?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0193/2010
Question for oral answer O-0193/2010
Ali Komisija lahko:
Can the Commission therefore:
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0194/2010
Question for oral answer O-0194/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Varnostni standardi za tovor v zračnem prometu
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Security standards in air freight
V globaliziranem svetu je terorizem postal globalna grožnja, neodvisna od svojih temeljnih vzrokov.
In a globalised world, terrorism has become a global threat independent of its root causes.
V demokratični družbi ni mogoče nikakor opravičiti nobene oblike terorizma.
In a democratic society no form of terrorism can have any possible justification.
Demokratične institucije morajo sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotavljanje varnosti državljanov.
The democratic institutions have to adopt all necessary measures to guarantee citizens’ safety.
Nekateri med njimi lahko vplivajo na naše običajno življenje ali našo svobodo.
Some of them may have an impact on our normal lives or affect our freedom.
Tehnologija je tesno povezana z najnovejšim napredkom pri preprečevanju terorizma, kar je postalo še posebej opazno v sektorju prevoza.
Technologies are closely related to the latest advances in fighting terrorism, and this has become more apparent in the transport sector.
Na več letih je bila ugotovljena domnevna prisotnost paketov z bombami.
Parcels containing bombs have reportedly been transported on several flights.
Vendar še vedno ni jasno, ali so se ti paketi prevažali na tovornih ali komercialnih potniških letih.
However, it is not yet clear whether these parcels were being transported on cargo planes or on commercial passenger flights.
Ti dogodki so ponovno sprožili razpravo o varnosti v zračnem prometu, zlasti pomisleke o varnosti pri prevozu tovora v zračnem prometu.
These events have reignited the debate on air safety, with a focus on security concerns arising from the transport of air freight.
Ali Komisija meni, da veljavni predpisi zagotavljajo ustrezno raven zaščite, ki je potrebna glede na nedavne dogodke, in ali namerava ponovno pregledati veljavno zakonodajo, da bi zagotovila boljšo zaščito pred takšnimi grožnjami?
Does the Commission consider that the existing regulations adequately provide for the level of protection needed in the context of recent events, and does it plan to revise the current legislation to provide better security against such threats?
Ali lahko Komisija potrdi, da se 40 % vsega tovora v zračnem prometu prevaža po komercialnih potniških letih?
Is the Commission in a position to confirm that 40% of all air freight is being transported on commercial passenger flights?
Če se tovor v zračnem prometu prevaža prek komercialnih potniških letih, ali lahko Komisija potrdi, da je takšen tovor pregledan v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi?
If air freight is being carried on commercial passenger flights, can the Commission confirm whether this freight is only subject to checks in accordance with existing regulations?
Če da, ali Komisija meni, da je treba takšen tovor pregledati z enakimi pregledi, kot veljajo za potnike in njihovo prtljago pred vkrcanjem na komercialni potniški let?
If so, does the Commission consider it necessary for this freight be subject to the same level of checks that passengers and their baggage are subject to before boarding a commercial passenger flight?
Kako bo Komisija uskladila potrebo po strožjem nadzoru, bodisi tehničnem (na primer z optičnimi bralniki) bodisi z drugimi sredstvi za pridobivanje informacij (na primer z vprašalniki), in pravico potnikov do zasebnosti?
How will the Commission reconcile the need for stricter controls, either technical (e.g. scanners) or by other means of information (e.g. questionnaires), with passengers’ right to privacy?
Kakšne ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela za zagotovitev enake ravni varnosti letov iz tretjih držav?
What steps will the Commission undertake to guarantee equal levels of security for flights coming from third countries?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0195/2010
Question for oral answer O-0195/2010
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Varnost igrač
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Safety of toys
Znanstveni odbor za zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja (SCHER) je 1. julija 2010 objavil znanstveno mnenje „Ocena mejnih migracijskih vrednosti kemičnih elementov v igračah“, ki ocenjuje metode iz Direktive 2009/48/ES za upravljanje s tveganji, ki izvirajo iz uporabe organskih CMR snovi.
On 1 July 2010 the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) published a scientific opinion on the 'Evaluation of the migration limits for chemical elements in toys', which evaluates the methods used in Directive 2009/48/EC for regulating the risk from organic CMR.
Odbor na eni strani priporoča, da naj varnost igrač temelji na mejnih migracijskih vrednostih, na drugi strani pa poudarja, da predpisana metoda za merjenje migracij kemičnih elementov (EN 71-3 (Standard)) ni zanesljiva.
The committee, on the one hand, recommends that toy safety should be based on migration limits but, on the other hand, points out that the method which is prescribed to measure the migration of chemical elements (EN 71-3 (Standard)) is not reliable.
Parlament je v preteklosti že pozval Komisijo, naj obravnava to vprašanje, vendar brez rezultatov.
Parliament has already called on the Commission to address this issue in the past, with no results.
Obstaja tudi veliko pomislekov glede mejnih vrednosti škodljivih snovi, kot so policiklični aromatski ogljikovodiki, v igračah, kljub dejstvu, da velja Direktiva 2009/48/ES za enega najstrožjih zakonov na svetu na področju varnosti igrač.
There are also widespread concerns regarding the limits for harmful substances like Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) in toys, despite the fact that Directive 2009/48/EC is considered as one of the world's strictest pieces of legislation in the area of toy safety.
Zadnja poročila RAPEX o vračanju nevarnih igrač vzbujajo pomisleke tudi glede nadzora trga igrač.
The latest RAPEX reports on the recall of unsafe toys also give cause for concern regarding market surveillance for toys.
Ali je Komisija istega mnenja kot odbor SCHER glede nezanesljivosti metode za merjenje migracij kemičnih elementov?
Does the Commission share the view of the SCHER opinion that the method for measuring the migration of chemical elements is not reliable?
Če je istega mnenja, s kakšnimi ukrepi namerava Komisija razrešiti to zadevo?
If so, what are the next steps that the Commission will undertake to resolve this issue?
S kakšnimi pobudami je oziroma bo Komisija zagotavljala boljši nadzor trga igrač, zlasti glede uvoženih izdelkov?
What kind of initiatives has the Commission taken, or will it take, to ensure better market surveillance of toys, notably as regards the imported products?
Ali je Komisija mnenja, da bi moral biti uporabo mejnih migracijskih vrednosti razširiti tudi na druge nevarne snovi v igračah, kot so policiklične aromatske ogljikovodikove spojine, namesto uporabe količinskih omejitev?
Does the Commission share the view that the approach to migration limits should be extended to other hazardous substances in toys, such as PAH compounds, instead of using the quantity limits approach?
Ali namerava Komisija seznam omejenih snovi in količine teh snovi, ki se lahko uporabijo v igračah, posodobiti z najnovejšimi razpoložljivimi znanstvenimi podatki?
Is the Commission planning to review the list of restricted substances and their quantities that can be used in toys to take into account the latest scientific data available?
Ali bi bila Komisija pripravljena raziskati varnostna tveganja, ki jih igrače za otroke, starejše od 36 mesecev, predstavljajo za otroke, mlajše od 36 mesecev?
Would the Commission be willing to investigate the issue of toys for children over 36 months old, regarding the safety risks they pose if used by children aged less than 36 months?
Ali Komisija meni, da kemični elementi kategorij CMR 1A in 1B po uredbi EU o razvrščanju, označevanju in pakiranju ne bi smeli biti prisotni v igračah?
Does the Commission share the view that chemical elements classified as CMR categories 1A and 1B, according to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation, should not be present in toys?
Kakšen časovni okvir Komisija predvideva za te ukrepe?
What will be the precise timeframe for the Commission’s proceedings?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0196/2010
Question for oral answer O-0196/2010
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Direktiva o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov (91/676/EGS) in dodeljevanje evropskih sredstev na področju kmetijstva in morja - Bretanja (Francija)
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources and allocation of European agriculture and marine funding - Brittany (France)
Na tisoče ton zelenih alg že več desetletij vsako leto naplavi na bretonske plaže v Franciji in se bujno razrašča v plitkih zalivih obale zaradi velike koncentracije nitratov.
For several decades, thousands of tons of green algae have been washing up on the beaches of Brittany, in France, and proliferating in the shallow bays off its coast owing to the high concentrations of nitrates present there.
Te alge, ki so v določenih količinah lahko smrtonosne, pa so zgolj vidni del številnih primerov okoljske škode v Bretanji.
These algae, which can prove fatal in sufficient doses, are only the most visible evidence of numerous environmental infractions in Brittany.
Ti preprečujejo trajnosten in solidaren razvoj regije in so posledica dejstva, da Francija ne spoštuje zakonodaje Unije, zlasti direktive 91/676/EGS o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov.
The damage to the environment makes sustainable, solidarity-based development of the region impossible and is the legacy of France’s flouting of EU rules, in particular Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources.
Francija z odklanjanjem izvajanja učinkovitih ureditvenih, nadzornih in finančnih ukrepov, namenjenih iskanju rešitve za to onesnaževanje, krši evropske predpise.
By refusing to put in place effective regulation, supervision or financing with a view to cleaning up this pollution, France is in breach of European rules.
Upravno sodišče v Rennesu, nato pa še upravno pritožbeno sodišče v Nantesu sta ugotovili, da je Francija odgovorna za onesnaževanje obale z razkrojem zelenih alg.
The administrative court of Rennes and then the administrative appeals court of Nantes have ruled that France is responsible for the pollution of the coast resulting from the decomposition of green algae.
Kako se namerava Komisija odzvati na to pritožbo?
What does the Commission intend to do in response to this complaint?
Francija ne spoštuje direktive 91/676/EGS o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov.
France is in breach of Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources.
Katere ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bo Francija spoštovala direktivo?
What action does the Commission intend to take to urge France to comply with the directive?
Dovoljenja, ki jih je Francija izdala področju kmetijstva in morja, ne spoštujejo francoskega prava, kršijo pa tudi evropsko pravo.
Permits granted by France for agricultural and marine activity are in breach of both French and European law.
Pogoj za dodelitev evropskih sredstev je popolno spoštovanje prava EU.
However, the allocation of European funding is conditional upon total compliance with EU law.
Francija z nezakonito izdajo dovoljenj za nekatere dejavnosti dejansko na nedovoljen način dodeljuje sredstva EU.
By authorising certain forms of activity, France is effectively responsible for the illicit allocation of EU funding.
Kaj namerava storiti Komisija, da bi napravila konec tem odklonom?
What does the Commission intend to do to put an end to this abuse?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0197/2010
Question for oral answer O-0197/2010
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Kriza z odpadki v Kampanji
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Waste crisis in Campania
Sodišče Evropske unije je 4. marca 2010 ugotovilo, da je Italija kršila zakonodajo EU, ker v Kampanji ni vzpostavila omrežja obratov, ki bi zadostovalo za odstranjevanje komunalnih odpadkov na način, ki ne ogroža zdravja ljudi in okolja (sodba v primeru C-297/08).
On 4 March 2010, the European Court of Justice found that Italy was in breach of EU legislation for having failed to set up in Campania a network of installations which is sufficient to ensure the disposal of urban waste in a manner which does not endanger human health and the environment (judgment in case C-297/08).
Komisija je 23. oktobra 2010 izjavila, da so sedanje razmere zelo podobne krizi, ki je izbruhnila leta 2007 in ki je Komisijo privedla do sprožitve postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev proti Italijanski republiki .
On 23 October 2010, the Commission declared that the current situation was very close to the crisis which exploded in 2007 and which led the Commission to open an infringement procedure against the Italian Republic .
Ali Komisija meni, da so takšne smernice dovolj?
Does the Commission consider that such guidelines are sufficient?
Če ne, kaj manjka?
If not, what is missing?
Kdaj bo Komisija začela postopek v skladu s členom 260 proti Italiji, da bi jo doletele kazni, s katerimi bi bili italijanski organi primorani upoštevati sodbo Sodišča, zlasti z dokazili, da so obstoječa odlagališča v skladu z zakonodajo EU in ne ogrožajo zdravja državljanov in okolja?
When will the Commission open Article 260 proceedings against Italy with a view to obtaining penalties in order to make the Italian authorities comply with the judgment of the Court, in particular by proving that the existing landfills comply with EU law and do not put in danger the health of citizens and the environment?
Ali bo Komisija prosila Sodišče za izdajo sodne prepovedi, če bodo obstoječa odlagališča na zaščitenih območjih razširjena ali če bodo odprta nova odlagališča na območjih Natura 2000, kot je nacionalni park vulkana Vezuv?
Will the Commission ask the Court of Justice for an injunction if existing landfills in nature protection areas are extended or new ones opened in Natura 2000 sites such as the Vesuvius National Park?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0198/2010
Question for oral answer O-0198/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Krizne razmere zaradi vulkanskega pepela
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Volcanic ash crisis
Zaprtje velikega dela evropskega zračnega prostora aprila in maja letos zaradi vulkanskega izbruha na Islandiji je povzročilo velike motnje prometa in gospodarsko škodo ter neposredno prizadelo deset milijonov potnikov.
The closure of large sectors of European air space in April/May this year due to the volcanic eruption in Iceland caused severe traffic disruption and economic damage and affected 10 million passengers directly.
Da bi preprečili ponovitev tovrstne krize, je treba sprejeti naslednje ukrepe.
In order to ensure there is no possibility of this kind of crisis happening again, the following measures need to be taken.
Dodatno je treba investirati v tehnološko opremo na tleh in v zraku (oprema LIDAR, radarske naprave, popolnoma opremljena testna letala, satelitski posnetki), saj so bili podatki, na podlagi katerih so predvidevali razvoj oblakov pepela, zaradi nezadostnih naprav na kraju samem na tleh in v zraku nepopolni.
In view of the fact that the data used to forecast the development of ash clouds was incomplete because of insufficient on-site ground and air installations, further investment in technological equipment on the ground and in the air (LIDAR equipment, radar installations, fully equipped verification aircraft, satellite imagery) is necessary.
Zanesljive napovedi je mogoče zagotoviti samo z okrepljeno tehnično podporo in 100-odstotno točnimi podatki v realnem času.
Only through increased technical provision and 100% accurate real-time data can a reliable forecast be provided.
Vloge posameznih institucij pri obvladovanju krize niso bile jasne, kar je še dodatno poslabšalo razmere.
The roles of the individual institutions in the management of the crisis were unclear, thus causing the situation to deteriorate further.
Vsi udeleženi (regulator, svetovalni centri za spremljanje vulkanskega pepela (VAAC) in izvajalci navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa) morajo biti popolnoma pripravljeni.
The parties involved (the regulator, the Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres (VAAC) and the air navigation service providers) must be fully prepared.
Zato je treba uvesti tečaje usposabljanja s simulacijo kriznih razmer (usposabljanje v postopku kriznega upravljanja).
To this end, training courses involving simulated crises (training in crisis management procedures) must be introduced.
Za varnost poletov so v prvi vrsti odgovorni letalski prevozniki, zato jim je treba zagotoviti natančne podatke.
The primary responsibility for the safety of flights rests with the operators, therefore they must be provided with accurate data.
Piloti so usposobljeni za izredne pogoje letenja, regulativni organi pregledajo, nadzorujejo in potrjujejo priročnike za varnost komercialnih letalskih družb, letalske družbe pa imajo potrebne izkušnje za letenje nad vulkanskim območjem, kar dokazuje njihova evidenca o varnosti.
Pilots are trained to manage extraordinary flight conditions, the commercial airlines’ safety manuals are reviewed, overseen and confirmed by regulatory authorities, and airlines have the necessary experience of operating over volcanic areas, as is shown by their safety record.
Zato bi moral biti letalski operater (pilot) odgovoren, da oceni tveganje in zagotovi varnost poletov, na primer z izbiro smeri letenja in po potrebi z odločitvijo o preusmeritvi ob upoštevanju vseh razpoložljivih informacij (boljše informiranje in izboljšanje tehnične opreme na letalih).
The airline operator (the pilot) should therefore be responsible for assessing the risk and ensuring the safety of flights by, for example, choosing routes or deciding if rerouting is necessary, taking into account all the information available (provision of more information and improved technical equipment on board aircraft).
Komisiji bi radi zastavili naslednja vprašanja:
We would like to ask the Commission:
Kakšno je stanje zgoraj omenjenih ukrepov?
What is the status of the above measures?
Ali postopek sodelovalnega odločanja ne bi moral biti bolj pregleden, da se zagotovi boljše in bolj usklajeno odzivanje na krizo?
Should the collaborative decision-making process not be more transparent, in order to ensure better and more coordinated responses in times of crisis?
Ali zaradi predvidenega vse gostejšega prometa v prihodnosti ne bi bilo treba pospešeno izvajati pobudo enotno evropsko nebo (SES)?
Should the increased volume of traffic expected in the future not lead to accelerated implementation of the SES?
Kaj je bilo storjeno, da bi to zadevo prevzela Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu in da bi se izvedla operativna sprememba, ki je v Evropi potrebna na tem področju?
What has been done to put EASA in charge of this matter and to steer the operational change that Europe needs in this area?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0199/2010
Question for oral answer O-0199/2010
v imenu Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve Zadeva: Vzpostavitev stalnega kriznega mehanizma za ohranjanje finančne stabilnosti v evroobmočju
on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Subject: Establishing a permanent crisis mechanism to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area
Evropski parlament je prepričan, da je treba vzpostaviti stalni krizni mehanizem za ohranjanje finančne stabilnosti evra.
The European Parliament is convinced of the need for a permanent crisis mechanism to safeguard the financial stability of the euro.
Opominja, da je tudi ECB v predlogih iz junija 2010 o krepitvi gospodarskega upravljanja v evroobmočju opozorila na to potrebo.
It recalls that the ECB similarly identified such a need in its proposals of June 2010 on ‘Reinforcing economic governance in the euro area’.
Prav tako je že prej ugotovil, da je potreben mehanizem za reševanje kriz v bančnem sektorju (gl. poročili Garcie-Margalla y Marfila in Ferreire iz leta 2010).
The Parliament has also previously identified the need for a crisis resolution mechanism for the banking sector (see the Garcia-Margallo y Marfil and Ferreira reports, 2010).