natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če volitev ne bo do ratifikacije začasnega ali končnega sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu, kar je zelo verjetno, kako bo Svet ocenil razmere v tem primeru?
In the likely event that there will not be an election until either the interim or the final EPA has been ratified, how will the Council assess the situation?
Kako bo ta ocena vplivala na ostalih 15 zahodnoafriških držav, ki izkoriščajo prednosti te pomembne dvoregionalne trgovine in sporazuma o razvoju?
How will this assessment affect the other 15 West African countries with regard to benefiting from an important bi-regional trade and development Agreement?
Ali lahko Svet pojasni časovni načrt glede razvojne pomoči v zvezi s sporazumom o gospodarskem partnerstvu s Slonokoščeno obalo?
Can the Council clarify the timeframe with regard to Côte d'Ivoire EPA related development assistance?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0048/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0048/09
Ali lahko Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu posreduje najnovejše informacije o predvidenih datumih sklenitve „celotnega“ sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu z regijo zahodne Afrike?
Can the Commission update the European Parliament on the expected dates for conclusion of a "full" EPA with the West Africa region?
Ali Komisija pričakuje, da bo podpis celovitega sporazuma dodatno spodbudil gospodarsko rast, razvoj in dobro upravljanje v Slonokoščeni obali in zahodnoafriški regiji kot celoti?
Does the Commission expect the signing of a comprehensive agreement to further promote economic growth, development and good governance in Ivory Coast and in the region of West Africa as a whole?
Ali je v pogajanjih treba upoštevati kakšne posebne interese v zvezi s to regijo in kako se bo ta „celoten“ sporazum o gospodarskem sodelovanju razlikoval od sporazuma Cariforum?
Are there any specific interests being taken into account regarding this region in the negotiations and how would this "full" EPA differ from the Cariforum agreement?
Ali bo Komisija Slonokoščeni obali, tudi njenemu zasebnemu sektorju, zagotovila ustrezno upravno in tehnično podporo, ki bi olajšali prehod gospodarstva po podpisu začasnega sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
Will the Commission undertake to provide adequate administrative and technical assistance to the Ivory Coast, including its private sector, in order to facilitate the transition of its economy following the signing of the interim Economic Partnership Agreement?
Ali bo Komisija kot pogoj za podpis „celotnega“ sporazuma o gospodarskem sodelovanju s Slonokoščeno obalo postavila tudi obstoj odgovorne in demokratično izvoljene vlade v tej državi?
Will the Commission make Ivory Coast's inclusion in a "full" EPA dependent on there being an accountable and democratically elected government in place in that country?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, kako ocenjuje naslednje vidike sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu med EU in Slonokoščeno obalo:
Can the Commission explain how it evaluates the following aspects with regard to the EU-Cote d´Ivoire EPA:
i) Ali so strožja pravila za zaščito novejših gospodarskih panog potrebna in/ali zagotovljena?
i) Are stronger rules for the protection of infant industries needed and/or ensured?
ii) Ali bodo pogajanja o pravicah intelektualne lastnine potekala tako, da ne bodo zaščitene zgolj evropske/mednarodne pravice intelektualne lastnine, pač pa tudi tradicionalna znanja?
ii) Will IPR be negotiated in such a way that not only European/international IPR are protected, but traditional knowledge as well?
iii) Ali je treba pravila vladnih naročil prilagoditi specifičnim potrebam Slonokoščene obale?
iii) Is there a need to shape government procurement rules according to Côte d´Ivoire-specific needs?
iv) V kolikšni meri so opredeljeni pogoji za delovne vize za Slonokoščeno obalo?
iv) How far are the conditions for "working visas" for Côte d'Ivoire nationals worked out?
Ali Komisija podpira zahtevo za posvetovanje s Parlamentom pred sprejetjem odločitve glede začasnih mednarodnih dogovorov, kakršni so sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu – saj je za vzpostavitev političnega soglasja potreben postopek privolitve?
Can the Commission support a request to consult the Parliament before taking a decision on the provisional application of international agreements – as is the case for the EPAs – when the assent procedure is required, to build political understanding for the assent procedure?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, kako bo ocenila politične razmere v Slonokoščeni obali v povezavi z začasnim ali končnim sporazumom o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
Can the Commission explain how it will assess the political situation of Côte d'Ivoire with regard either to an interim or final EPA?
Če volitev ne bo do ratifikacije začasnega ali končnega sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu, kar je zelo verjetno, kako bo Komisija ocenila razmere v tem primeru?
In the likely event, that there will not be an election until either the interim or the final EPA has been ratified, how will the Commission assess the situation?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni časovni načrt glede razvojne pomoči v zvezi s sporazumom o gospodarskem partnerstvu s Slonokoščeno obalo?
Can the Commission clarify the timeframe with regard to Côte d'Ivoire EPA related development assistance?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0049/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0049/09
Zadeva: Nadaljnji ukrepi po deklaraciji ministrov za šport Evropske unije na srečanju v Biarritzu novembra 2008
Subject: Follow-up to the Declaration of the Sports Ministers of the European Union at their meeting in Biarritz in November 2008
Deklaracija ministrov za šport Evropske unije na srečanju v Biarritzu novembra 2008 je določila dve ključni nalogi evropskih institucij:
The Declaration of the Sports Ministers of the European Union at their meeting in Biarritz in November 2008 set two key tasks for European institutions:
a) "ministri zahtevajo, da zadevne evropske institucije okrepijo sedanje mehanizme dialoga z določitvijo posvetovalnega okvira od leta 2009 naprej, ki bo povezoval zlasti Mednarodni olimpijski komite in predstavnike športnih gibanj."
(a) ‘the ministers ask the relevant European institutions to strengthen current dialogue mechanisms by setting up a consultative framework as of 2009 associating notably the International Olympic Committee and representatives of the sports movement’;
b) "evropski ministri pozivajo Komisijo, naj zagotovi jasnejše pravne smernice o uporabi zakonodaje EU za športne organizacije".
(b) ‘European ministers call on the Commission to provide clearer legal guidelines on the application of EU law to sport organisations’.
Ali nam Komisija lahko odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Could the Commission answer the following questions?
Katere ukrepe je Komisija sprejela do sedaj in katere namerava sprejeti v preostalem delu svojega mandata, da bi zaključila te naloge?
What steps has the Commission taken so far, and what steps does the Commission intend to take, during the remainder of its mandate, to complete these tasks?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi moral biti 'posvetovalni okvir' formalen ali neformalen, ter katere športne predstavnike namerava povabiti?
Does the Commission believe the ‘consultative framework’ should be formal or informal, and which sports representatives does the Commission intend to invite?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0050/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0050/09
Zadeva: Težave podjetij iz držav članic EU pri izvajanju storitev v Švici
Subject: Problems concerning the provision of services in Switzerland by firms from EU Member States
1. junija 2002 je začelo veljati več dvostranskih sporazumov med Švico in Evropsko unijo na področju prostega pretoka in prevoza potnikov.
On 1 June 2002 a number of bilateral agreements concerning the freedom of movement of persons between Switzerland and the European Union entered into force.
Ti sporazumi odpirajo švicarski trg za izvajalce storitev iz držav članic EU ter trge držav članic EU za švicarske izvajalce storitev.
These agreements open up the Swiss market to service providers from EU Member States and the EU markets to Swiss service providers.
Za varstvo švicarskih delavcev in delavcev, ki so napoteni iz držav članic EU, švicarski zakon o napotitvi predvideva, da je treba upoštevati švicarske standarde glede plačila in socialnega varstva.
In order to protect Swiss workers and workers posted from EU Member States, Swiss law provides that Swiss pay and social standards must be respected.
Pripravljavci vprašanja to izrecno pozdravljajo, vendar se v praksi porajajo številne težave, ki po nepotrebnem otežujejo izvajanje storitev.
This is specifically welcomed by the authors of this question; however, practical implementation poses a number of problems, which make the provision of services unnecessarily complicated.
Tuji izvajalci le s težavo ugotovijo, katera s kolektivno pogodbo določena minimalna plača velja v kateri panogi v posameznem kantonu, v katerem se izvajajo storitve.
For instance, it is extremely difficult for a foreign service provider to establish which collectively agreed minimum wage applies in a given branch in the canton where the services are to be provided.
Njihovo izvajanje ovirata tudi s tem povezana pravna negotovost in nepreglednost.
The resultant legal uncertainty and lack of transparency hamper the provision of services.
Boljša preglednost in večja usklajenost sta v interesu tako švicarskih kot tujih podjetij in delavcev, ki delajo v Švici.
Greater transparency and increased coordination are in the interests of both Swiss firms and workers and foreign firms of workers working in Switzerland.
Zaradi tega bi morala tuja podjetja, ki želijo opravljati dejavnosti v Švici, še pred vstopom v to državo zahtevati pojasnila o delovni zakonodaji in kolektivnih pogodbah, ki veljajo v njej.
For this reason, foreign firms wishing to work in Switzerland should have a clear understanding of the labour laws and collective agreements obtaining in Switzerland before becoming established in that country.
Načeloma se podjetniki iz obmejnih regij pritožujejo, da se tolmačenje zakonov med kantoni močno razlikuje.
Basically, entrepreneurs from border areas complain that there are very substantial differences in the interpretation of laws between the individual cantons.
Tuja podjetja imajo težave predvsem zaradi obvezne prijave ponudnikov storitev osem dni pred začetkom dela, kot je določeno v švicarskem zakonu o napotitvi delavcev.
This also applies to the obligation - provided for in the Swiss law on the posting of workers - for service providers to register with the authorities eight days before beginning work, which creates problems for foreign firms.
Švicarski državni sekretariat za gospodarstvo (SECO) si v okviru trinacionalne delovne skupine za lažje izvrševanje zakona o napotitvi prizadeva za večjo preglednost in poenostavitev postopkov za tuje izvajalce storitev.
The Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) is endeavouring to increase transparency and simplify procedures for foreign service providers within the framework of the tri-national working party for the facilitation of the implementation of the law on posting.
Ali Evropska komisija vidi možnosti, kako bi lahko pripomogla k temu, da bi prednosti, ki jih ponuja prosti pretok storitev s Švico, v prihodnje bolje izkoristili?
In view of the above, does the Commission envisage any means to help ensure that the advantages offered by the free movement of services with Switzerland can in practice be used to better effect in future?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0051/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0051/09
Zadeva: Evropska vest in junaki boja proti totalitarizmu
Subject: European conscience and heroes of the fight against totalitarianism
Kakšen je njegov odziv na praško deklaracijo z naslovom Evropska vest in komunizem, ki je bila sprejeta 3. junija 2008 na konferenci v Pragi?
What response does the Council have to the Prague Declaration, adopted at the Prague Conference, ‘European Conscience and Communism’, on 3 June 2008?
Ali Svet podpira predlog praške deklaracije za ustanovitev inštituta za evropski spomin in vest kot evropskega raziskovalnega inštituta za študijе totalitarizma in kot vseevropskega muzeja/spomenika za vse žrtve totalitarnih režimov, kjer bi bila prikazana primerjava zločinov, ki so jih proti človeštvu zagrešili totalitarni komunistični in nacistični režimi?
Does the Council support the Prague Declaration's proposal that an Institute of European Memory and Conscience be established, as a European research institute for the studies of totalitarianism and as a pan-European museum/memorial for all the victims of totalitarian regimes, demonstrating the comparison of crimes committed against humanity by totalitarian Communist and Nazi regimes?
Ali poleg tega Svet podpira pobudo skupine UEN, da bi 25. maj razglasili za mednarodni dan junakov boja proti totalitarizmu?
In addition, does the Council support the initiative taken by the UEN group to proclaim 25 May as the International Day of the Heroes of the Fight Against Totalitarianism?
25. maja je bil usmrčen rotamaster Witold Pilecki, ki je med drugo svetovno vojno edini prostovoljno šel v koncentracijsko taborišče, da bi tam organiziral odporniško gibanje in zbral podatke o množičnih pobojih, po pobegu iz Auschwitza pa se je boril proti nacističnemu in nato komunističnemu režimu.
25 May is the anniversary of the execution of the death sentence on Rotamaster Witold Pilecki, the only person who voluntarily went to a concentration camp during World War II in order to organise the resistance movement there and collect information about mass murders, and who after his escape from Auschwitz fought first the Nazi, and then the Communist regimes.
Z ustanovitvijo mednarodnega dneva junakov boja proti totalitarizmu bi ohranili živ spomin na preteklost in ljudi, kot so bili Čeh Karel Stransky, Nemec Otto Küsel in številni drugi, ki bi morali zaradi svoje predanosti, zvestobe idealom, humanizmu, časti in pogumu podobno kot Witold Pilecki v zavesti Evropejcev biti zapisani kot junaki obdobja totalitarizma.
Establishing the International Day of the Heroes of the Fight Against Totalitarianism would be a great way of keeping a living memory of the past and the people like Czech Karel Stransky or German Otto Küsel and many others who, similarly to Witold Pilecki, should be written into the awareness of Europeans as the heroes of the totalitarian age, because of their dedication, faithfulness to ideals, humanism, honour and courage.
Vaclav Klaus, predsednik Češke republike, ki sedaj predseduje Evropski uniji, je pobudo že podprl.
President Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic, the country holding the Presidency of the EU, has already voiced his support for this initiative.
Kakšno je stališče Sveta do predloga?
What is the Council’s position towards the group’s proposal?
Ali bi se strinjal z razglasitvijo 25. maja za mednarodni dan junakov boja proti totalitarizmu?
Would the Council agree to support proclaiming 25 May as the International Day of the Heroes of the Fight Against Totalitarianism?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0052/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0052/09
S katerim ukrepom se namerava Komisija odzvati na pisno izjavo 0044/2008 - P6_TA(2008)0439 , ki jo je Parlament sprejel 9. septembra 2008 in v kateri je 23. avgust razglašen za evropski dan spomina na žrtve stalinizma in nacizma?
What action does the Commission propose to take in response to Written Declaration 0044/2008 - P6_TA(2008)0439 adopted by the Parliament on 9 September 2008, which proclaims 23 August as the European Day of Remembrance for the victims of Stalinism and Nazism?
Kakšen je njen odziv na praško deklaracijo z naslovom Evropska vest in komunizem, ki je bila sprejeta 3. junija 2008 na konferenci v Pragi?
What response does the Commission have to the Prague Declaration, adopted at the Prague Conference, ‘European Conscience and Communism’, on 3 June 2008?
Ali Komisija podpira predlog praške deklaracije za ustanovitev inštituta za evropski spomin in vest kot evropskega raziskovalnega inštituta za študije totalitarizma in kot vseevropskega muzeja/spomenika za vse žrtve totalitarnih režimov, kjer bi bila prikazana primerjava zločinov, ki so jih proti človeštvu zagrešili komunistični in nacistični režimi?
Does the Commission support the Prague Declaration's proposal that an Institute of European Memory and Conscience be established, as a European research institute for the studies of totalitarianism and as a pan-European museum/memorial for all the victims of totalitarian regimes, demonstrating the comparison of crimes committed against humanity by totalitarian Communist and Nazi regimes?
Ali poleg tega Komisija podpira pobudo skupine UEN, da bi 25. maj razglasili za mednarodni dan junakov boja proti totalitarizmu?
In addition, does the Commission support the initiative taken by the UEN group to proclaim 25 May as the International Day of the Heroes of the Fight Against Totalitarianism?
Skupina je pismo na to temo poslala njenemu predsedniku Manuelu Barrosu.
The appropriate letter has been sent by the group to President Manuel Barroso.
Kakšno je stališče Komisije do teh predlogov?
What is the Commission’s position towards the group’s proposal?
Ali bi se strinjala z razglasitvijo 25. maja za mednarodni dan junakov boja proti totalitarizmu?
Would the Commission agree to support proclaiming 25 May as the International Day of the Heroes of the Fight Against Totalitarianism?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0053/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0053/09
Zadeva: Leto dni po podpisu evropskega soglasja o humanitarni pomoči
Subject: One year on from signature of the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid
Svet in predstavniki vlad držav članic v Svetu, Evropski parlament in Evropska komisija so 18. decembra 2007 podpisali evropsko soglasje o humanitarni pomoči.
The European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid was signed jointly by the Council and the representatives of the Member States’ governments meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission on 18 December 2007.
Pogajanja med tremi institucijami so bila pomembna priložnost za dosego političnega soglasja o načinu ukrepanja v vse bolj zapletenih kriznih razmerah ter za določitev tega, kdaj naj Evropa sprejme humanitarne ukrepe.
The process of negotiations between the three Institutions provided an important opportunity to reach a political consensus on how to react to increasingly complex crisis situations and to define, for Europe, the boundaries of humanitarian action.
Akcijski načrt Evropske komisije, v katerem so bili predstavljeni konkretni ukrepi za oblikovanje skupnega besedila, je bil sprejet 29. maja 2008, Svet pa ga je potrdil 22. julija 2008.
A Commission action plan setting out specific measures to implement this joint text was adopted on 29 May 2008 and approved by the Council on 22 July 2008.
Člen 101 soglasja se glasi: O napredku EU pri izvajanju tega soglasja o humanitarni pomoči bi bilo treba redno razpravljati v Svetu in z Evropskim parlamentom, pregledati pa bi ga bilo treba pet let po podpisu.
Article 101 of the Consensus states that ‘EU progress in implementation of this Consensus on Humanitarian Aid should be discussed regularly in Council and with the European Parliament ...’
Da bi zagotovili redno preverjanje politike humanitarne pomoči (člen 28 soglasja), je bil mandat delovne skupine za pomoč v hrani razširjen, tako da vključuje tudi humanitarno pomoč, in bo začel veljati 1. januarja 2009.
With a view to conducting a regular assessment of humanitarian aid policy (Article 28 of the Consensus), the mandate of the ‘Food Aid’ group has been extended to include humanitarian aid, and will come into force on 1 January 2009.
Kakšen mandat natančno je bil dodeljen v tej novi obliki?
What exactly is the mandate of this new configuration?
Kako namerava Svet izvajati soglasje, še posebej v zvezi z vprašanji usklajevanja in skladnosti?
And how does the Council intend to implement the Consensus, particularly with regard to coordination and coherence?
Kakšna je v luči vse večjega števila naravnih nesreč in podnebnih sprememb strategija Evropske unije, da bi v svojo politiko humanitarne in razvojne pomoči vključila zmanjšanje tveganj, povezanih s katastrofami, in pripravo nanje v državah v razvoju?
In view of the growing frequency of natural disasters and changes to the climate, what is the EU’s political strategy for incorporating disaster risk reduction and disaster preparedness in developing countries into its humanitarian and development aid policy?
Kakšna pozornost se namenja humanitarnim krizam, pri katerih mednarodna humanitarna pomoč ni ustrezna zaradi premajhnih finančnih sredstev ali katere se jih je zanemarilo oziroma nanje pozabilo?
What attention is given to humanitarian crises which are under-funded, neglected or forgotten, where the global international humanitarian response is inadequate?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Evropska unija sprejeti po mednarodni konferenci o spoštovanju mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, ki je potekala 16. septembra 2008, da bi zagotovili humanitarni prostor, ki je potreben za zagotavljanje dostopa do ranljivih skupin prebivalstva ali za varnost humanitarnih delavcev?
How will the EU follow up the International Conference on respect for international humanitarian law of 16 September 2008, with a view to preserving the ‘humanitarian area’ needed to ensure security for humanitarian workers and give them access to vulnerable populations?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0054/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0054/09
Svet in predstavniki vlad držav članic v Svetu, Evropski parlament in Evropska komisija so 18. decembra 2007 podpisali evropsko soglasje o humanitarni pomoči.
The European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid was signed jointly by the Council and representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission on 18 December 2007.
Leto dni po podpisu soglasja bi bilo primerno izvesti oceno ukrepanja Evropske unije na področju humanitarne pomoči.
One year after the Consensus was signed it is time to review the European Union’s action in the field of humanitarian aid.
- Katere ukrepe na splošno je sprejela Evropska unija v letu 2008 in katere še namerava sprejeti za izpolnjevanje zavez iz soglasja?
– In general terms, what measures has the European Union taken in 2008 and what measures will it be taking to implement the commitments set out in the Consensus?
- Kakšna je v luči vse večjega števila naravnih nesreč in podnebnih sprememb strategija Evropske unije, da bi v svojo politiko humanitarne in razvojne pomoči vključila zmanjšanje tveganj, povezanih s katastrofami, in pripravo nanje v državah v razvoju?
– In view of the growing frequency of natural disasters and climate changes, what is the EU’s political strategy for integrating disaster risk reduction and disaster preparation in developing countries into its humanitarian aid and development policy?
- Kakšna pozornost se namenja humanitarnim krizam, pri katerih mednarodna humanitarna pomoč ni ustrezna zaradi premajhnih finančnih sredstev ali ker se je krizo zanemarilo oziroma se je nanjo pozabilo?
– What attention is being given to under-financed, neglected or forgotten humanitarian crises, where the international global humanitarian response is inadequate?
- Kakšne ukrepe namerava Evropska unija sprejeti po mednarodni konferenci o spoštovanju mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, ki je potekala 16. septembra 2008, da bi zagotovili humanitarni prostor, ki je potreben za zagotavljanje dostopa do ranljivih skupin prebivalstva ali za varnost humanitarnih delavcev?
– What action will the European Union be taking in response to the International Conference on Respect for Humanitarian International Law of 16 September 2008, to preserve the ‘humanitarian space’ needed to guarantee access to vulnerable populations and the safety of humanitarian workers?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0055/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0055/09
Zadeva: Strategija EU o invazivnih vrstah ter vmesnem pregledu akcijskega načrta o biotski raznovrstnosti
Subject: EU strategy on invasive species and mid-term review of biodiversity action plan