natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- Ali se strinja, da je negativna svoboda združevanja enako pomembna kakor pozitivna svoboda združevanja in da jo je treba zaščititi?
- Does the Commission agree that the negative freedom of association has the same importance as the positive right of association and needs to be protected?
- Ali v zvezi s svobodo nezdruževanja Komisija meni, da je švedska zakonodaja o delovnih razmerjih popolnoma v skladu s črko in duhom pogodb ter drugih ustreznih konvencij in sporazumov, ki so obvezujoči za države članice EU?
- With regard to the freedom of non-association, does the Commission believe that the Swedish labour relations legislation is fully in line with the letter and the spirit of the Treaties and other relevant conventions and agreements that are binding upon EU Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000286/2011
Question for oral answer O-000286/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Pogoji izvrševanja pripora in zaporne kazni v EU
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Detention conditions in the EU
Komisija je objavila zeleno knjigo o uporabi kazenskopravne zakonodaje EU na področju pripora, o kateri se trenutno posvetuje z zainteresiranimi stranmi.
The Commission has issued a Green Paper on the application of EU criminal justice legislation in the field of detention, on which it is currently consulting stakeholders.
Zelena knjiga osvetljuje povezave med pripornimi pogoji in različnimi instrumenti EU, kot sta evropski nalog za prijetje in evropski nalog za nadzor, ter pojasnjuje, da so med temami, o katerih bi EU lahko podala pobude, tudi pripor pred sojenjem, položaj otrok in priporni pogoji.
The Green Paper highlights the connections between detention conditions and various EU instruments, such as the European Arrest Warrant and the European Supervision Order, and illustrates how pre-trial detention, the situation of children and detention conditions are issues on which the EU could take initiatives.
V sporočilu je opisano zelo različno in pogosto skrb zbujajoče stanje v državah članicah, zlasti kar zadeva število oseb v priporu pred sojenjem, stopnjo zasedenosti zaporov in njihovo prenapolnjenost, število zapornikov ter delež zapornikov, ki niso državljani zadevne države.
The Communication contains an annex illustrating that the situation in Member States is very varied and often worrying, notably in relation to the number of pre-trial detainees, prison occupancy level and overcrowding, the size of the prison population, and the detention rate for non-nationals.
Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice je države članice EU večkrat obsodilo zaradi pripornih pogojev, dolžine pripora pred sojenjem ter delovanja njihovega pravosodja, med drugim na podlagi poročil Odbora za preprečevanje mučenja Sveta Evrope.
The European Court of Human Rights has also repeatedly condemned EU Member States with regard to detention conditions, the length of pre-trial detention and the administration of justice, including on the basis of the reports of the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture.
S katerimi ukrepi na ravni EU namerava Svet zagotoviti spoštovanje temeljnih pravic oseb v priporu ter izboljšanje pripornih pogojev v državah članicah?
What will the Council do at EU level to ensure that the fundamental rights of persons detained in prisons are respected and that detention conditions are improved in Member States?
Ali Svet priznava nasprotje med pripornimi pogoji, ki ne dosegajo standardov, ter izvajanjem evropskega naloga za prijetje, kot ga prikazujejo vprašanja, ki so se pojavila pri obravnavanju zadeve C-396/11 (Radu)?
Does the Council recognise the tension between substandard detention conditions and the execution of a European arrest warrant as underlined by the questions raised in Case C-396/11, Radu ?
Ali lahko Svet predstavi dejanske statistične podatke glede povprečnega časa, ki ga osebe, predane z evropskim nalogom za prijetje, preživijo v priporu pred sojenjem?
Can the Council provide concrete statistics as regards the average amount of time persons surrendered under a European Arrest Warrant spent in pre-trial detention?
Ali bi Svet sprejel postopkovne zahteve za zadržanje osumljencev v priporu pred sojenjem, vključno z možnostjo pregleda in najdaljšim možnim časom zadržanja pred izpustitvijo?
Is the Council willing to accept procedural requirements for keeping suspects in pre-trial detention, including possibilities for review and maximum periods before being released?
Ali bi Svet predlagal zakonodajo EU, ki bi vključevala evropska zaporniška pravila, ki jih je razvil Svet Evrope, zlasti glede nastanitve, dostopa do zdravstvene oskrbe in pravnega svetovanja?
Is the Council willing to propose EU legislation incorporating the European Prison Rules developed by the Council of Europe, particularly as regards accommodation, access to health care and legal advice?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000287/2011
Question for oral answer O-000287/2011
S katerimi ukrepi na ravni EU namerava Komisija zagotoviti spoštovanje temeljnih pravic oseb v priporu ter izboljšanje pripornih pogojev v državah članicah?
What will the Commission do at EU level to ensure that the fundamental rights of persons detained in prisons are respected and that detention conditions are improved in Member States?
Ali Komisija priznava nasprotje med pripornimi pogoji, ki ne dosegajo standardov, ter izvajanjem evropskega naloga za prijetje, kot ga prikazujejo vprašanja, ki so se pojavila pri obravnavanju zadeve C-396/11 (Radu)?
Does the Commission recognise the tension between substandard detention conditions and the execution of a European arrest warrant as underlined by the questions raised in Case C-396/11, Radu ?
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi dejanske statistične podatke glede povprečnega časa, ki ga osebe, predane z evropskim nalogom za prijetje, preživijo v priporu pred sojenjem?
Can the Commission provide concrete statistics as regards the average amount of time persons surrendered under a European Arrest Warrant spent in pre-trial detention?
Ali bi Komisija predlagala postopkovne zahteve za zadržanje osumljencev v priporu pred sojenjem, vključno z možnostjo pregleda in najdaljšim možnim časom zadržanja pred izpustitvijo?
Is the Commission willing to propose procedural requirements for keeping suspects in pre-trial detention, including possibilities for review and maximum periods before being released?
Ali bi Komisija predlagala zakonodajo EU, ki bi vključevala evropska zaporniška pravila, ki jih je razvil Svet Evrope, zlasti glede nastanitve, dostopa do zdravstvene oskrbe in pravnega svetovanja?
Is the Commission willing to propose EU legislation incorporating the European Prison Rules developed by the Council of Europe, particularly as regards accommodation, access to health care and legal advice?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000288/2011
Question for oral answer O-000288/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Odprava diskriminacije Romov
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Abolition of Roma discrimination
Kljub okviru EU za nacionalne strategije vključevanja Romov, ki ga je uvedla Evropska komisija, Svet pa pozdravil, in kljub smernicam za države članice glede oblikovanja nacionalnih strategij vključevanja Romov, ki jih je prav tako izdala Komisija, se diskriminacija Romov v EU nadaljuje.
Notwithstanding the EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies launched by the Commission and welcomed by the Council and the issuing by the European Commission of guidelines addressed to Member States for the formulation of the National Roma Integration Strategies (NRIS), discrimination of Roma in the EU is still taking place.
Na področju nediskriminacije je treba še veliko narediti, saj je rasno sovraštvo do Romov močno razširjeno, uporaba in izvajanje veljavne zakonodaje pa nezadostna.
There is a lot to achieve regarding non-discrimination, considering the widespread antigypsism and the insufficient implementation of existing regulations.
Romske skupnosti so pogosto izolirane v getih in se soočajo z zelo nizko stopnjo zaposlenosti ter z neenakim dostopom do zdravstvene oskrbe; predvsem romski otroci so prizadeti zaradi slabe izobrazbe v obliki izoliranega poučevanja in romskih razredov, čeprav je izobrazba eno najpomembnejših orodij za preprečevanje revščine.
Roma communities are often segregated in ghetto areas and suffer from extremely low rates of employment, unequal access to health care; in particular, Roma children are subject to low-quality education in the form of segregated education and gypsy-only classrooms, while education is one of the most important tools to avoid poverty.
Vse evropske države – sedanje in prihodnje članice Evropske unije – morajo sodelovati v skupnih prizadevanjih za odpravo te zgodovinske socialne izključenosti največje narodnostne manjšine naše celine in podpisati strategijo EU za vključevanje Romov.
All European countries – present and future members of the European Union – must engage themselves in a concerted effort to overcome this historic social exclusion of the continent’s largest ethnic minority, and sign up for the EU’s strategy on Roma inclusion.
Se lahko Svet zaveže, da bo sprejel ukrepe za preprečevanje diskriminatorne obravnave in hkrati zagotovil izvajanje strategije EU?
Can the Council commit itself to taking measures aimed at avoiding discriminatory treatment, while ensuring the implementation of the EU strategy?
Kako lahko Svet zagotovi razvoj obsežnega sistema za zaposlovanje in blaginjo, dostop do vseživljenjskega učenja za boljše možnosti na trgu dela ter enako obravnavo in enake možnosti v politikah zaposlovanja in programih socialnega vključevanja in kako lahko zagotovi izboljšanje udeležbe Romov pri načrtovanju, izvajanju in spremljanju skladov EU na lokalni ravni?
How can the Council ensure the development of a complex employment and welfare system, access to lifelong learning for better chances in the labour market and equal treatment and equal opportunities in employment policies and programmes aimed at social inclusion, and how can it guarantee the improvement of Roma participation at local level in planning, executing and monitoring EU funds?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000289/2011
Question for oral answer O-000289/2011
Romske skupnosti so pogosto izolirane v getih in se soočajo z zelo nizko stopnjo zaposlenosti ter z neenakim dostopom do zdravstvene oskrbe; predvsem romski otroci so prizadeti zaradi slabe izobrazbe v obliki izoliranega poučevanja in romskih razredov, čeprav je izobrazba eno najpomembnejših orodij za preprečevanje revščine.
Roma communities are often segregated in ghetto areas and suffer from extremely low rates of employment and unequal access to health care; in particular, Roma children are subject to low-quality education in the form of segregated education and gypsy-only classrooms, while education is one of the most important tools to avoid poverty.
Vse evropske države – sedanje in prihodnje članice Evropske unije – morajo sodelovati v skupnih prizadevanjih za odpravo te zgodovinske socialne izključenosti največje narodnostne manjšine te celine in podpisati strategijo EU za vključevanje Romov.
All European countries – present and future members of the European Union – must engage themselves in a concerted effort to overcome this historic social exclusion of the continent’s largest ethnic minority, and sign up for the EU’s strategy on Roma inclusion.
Lahko Komisija pomaga pri preprečevanju diskriminatorne obravnave ter hkrati zagotovi izvajanje strategije EU in oceno obstoječih zakonodajnih instrumentov?
Can the Commission help in avoiding discriminatory treatment, while ensuring the implementation of the EU strategy and the evaluation of existing legal instruments?
Lahko Komisija uvede merila za oceno evropskih akcijskih načrtov za Rome in napove, kako in kdaj bo krizni zemljevid pripravljen za načrtovanje, spremljanje in oceno?
Can the Commission introduce criteria for evaluating the European Roma Action Plans and illustrate how and when the ‘crisis map’ will be ready for planning, monitoring and evaluating?
Kako lahko Komisija zagotovi razvoj obsežnega sistema za zaposlovanje in blaginjo, dostop do vseživljenjskega učenja za boljše možnosti na trgu dela ter enako obravnavo in enake možnosti v politikah zaposlovanja in programih socialnega vključevanja in kako lahko zagotovi boljšo udeležbe Romov pri načrtovanju, izvajanju in spremljanju skladov EU na lokalni ravni?
How can the Commission ensure the development of a complex employment and welfare system, access to lifelong learning for better chances in the labour market and equal treatment and equal opportunities in employment policies and programmes aimed at social inclusion, and how can it guarantee the improvement of Roma participation at local level in planning, executing and monitoring EU funds?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000290/2011
Question for oral answer O-000290/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Prispevek skupne ribiške politike k proizvodnji javnih dobrin
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Contribution of the CFP to the production of public goods
Ribiški sektor ima poleg osnovne naloge zagotavljati oskrbovanje prebivalstva z ribami, zaradi katere je zelo pomemben za ravnovesje prehrambne bilance v državah članicah, še veliko obsežnejše funkcije in cilje.
The fisheries sector, in addition to its key role of ensuring fish supplies and its consequent importance for the food balance in the Member States, has a wide range of functions and objectives.
Vse to govori v prid družbenemu in gospodarskemu pomenu ribiškega sektorja, ki se torej niti slučajno ne more ocenjevati zgolj po vrednosti iztovora.
These all contribute to its socio-economic significance, which therefore cannot be assessed purely in terms of catch value.
Poleg tega ima, če se vzame ribiški sektor na splošno, mali priobalni ribolov poseben družbeno-ekonomski, okoljski in kulturni pomen.
In the overall context of the fisheries sector, small-scale fishing is of particular importance in socio-economic, environmental and cultural terms.
Večfunkcionalnost ribiškega sektorja, vključno z ribogojstvom, je vidna na zelo različnih področjih, med drugim:
The multifunctional nature of the fisheries sector (including aquaculture) is manifested in aspects such as the following:
- prispeva k razvoju in družbeno-ekonomski blaginji obalnih skupnosti, lokalnemu razvoju in ustvarjanju neposrednih delovnih mest v sektorju;
- contribution to the advancement and socio-economic wellbeing of coastal communities, in terms of local development and direct job creation in the sector;
- vzdržuje in ustvarja gospodarske dejavnosti in delovna mesta, ki so v proizvodni verigi pred ali za ribolovom (ladjedelništvo, industrija za predelavo ribiških proizvodov, turizem in gostinstvo so le nekatere izmed njih);
- preservation and creation of economic activity and jobs, both upstream and downstream from fishing as such (vessel construction, processing of fishery products, tourism and catering, etc);
- oskrbuje prebivalstvo s kakovostnimi proizvodi visoke hranilne vrednosti, kot so sveže ribe;
- supplying products of high quality and nutritional value such as fresh fish;
- ohranja zgodovinsko in kulturno dediščino ter lokalno tradicijo, povezano z ribiškim sektorjem;
- conservation of the historical and cultural heritage and local traditions related to fisheries;
- prispeva k izobraževanju in znanstvenemu raziskovanju morja, rečnih ustij in sladkih voda ter k večanju in posodabljanju védenja o stanju teh ekosistemov.
- supporting for education and scientific research related to seas, estuaries and inland waters and contributing to the advancement and updating of knowledge on the state of their ecosystems.
Ali lahko Komisija glede na navedeno odgovori na naslednja vprašanja?
Given the above, can the Commission state:
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000291/2011
Question for oral answer O-000291/2011
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Izvajanje strategije za Rome
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Implementation of the Roma strategy
Ali lahko Svet po odobritvi poročila o strategiji EU o vključevanju Romov ( P7_TA(2011)0092 ) na delnem zasedanju v Strasbourgu 9. marca 2011 in ob upoštevanju zahtev, ki jih je Evropski parlament v zvezi s tem naslovil na druge evropske institucije odgovori, kateri so predvideni ukrepi za izvajanje strategije za Rome?
Following the approval of the report on EU strategy on Roma inclusion ( P7_TA(2011)0092 ) at the Strasbourg part-session on 9 March 2011, and considering the requests made by the EP on this matter to the other European institutions, can the Council state what are the next steps foreseen for the implementation of the Roma strategy?
Kakšna je finančna obveznost, predvidena za izvajanje strategije?
What is the financial commitment foreseen for the implementation of the strategy?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000292/2011
Question for oral answer O-000292/2011
Ali lahko Komisija po odobritvi poročila o strategiji EU o vključevanju Romov ( P7_TA(2011)0092 ) na delnem zasedanju v Strasbourgu 9. marca 2011 in ob upoštevanju zahtev, ki jih je Evropski parlament v zvezi s tem naslovil na druge evropske institucije odgovori, kateri so predvideni ukrepi za izvajanje strategije za Rome?
Following the approval of the report on EU strategy on Roma inclusion ( P7_TA(2011)0092 ) at the Strasbourg part-session on 9 March 2011, and considering the requests made by the EP on this matter to the other European institutions, can the Commission state what are the next steps foreseen for the implementation of the Roma strategy?
Kakšna je finančna obveznost, ki jo Komisija predvideva za izvajanje strategije?
What is the financial commitment foreseen by the Commission for the implementation of the strategy?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000293/2011
Question for oral answer O-000293/2011
Iz več poročil okoljskih organizacij je razvidno, da se v Evropi povečuje število prijav pri Evropskem patentnem uradu za podelitev patenta za rastline iz konvencionalne pridelave.
Several reports by environmental organisations show that Europe is seeing a growing trend in the number of applications to the European Patent Office (EPO) for patents on plants derived from conventional breeding.
Leta 2010 je razširjeni odbor za pritožbe Evropskega patentnega urada odločil, da ni mogoče patentirati metod za konvencionalno pridelavo rastlin (G2/07 in G1/08).
In 2010, the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal decided that methods used for conventionally breeding plants are not patentable (G2/07 and G1/08).
Patent se je zahteval za postopek pridelave, pa tudi za dele rastlin.
These patents claimed the process for breeding as well as the parts of the plants.
V zadevah G2/07 in G1/08 je Evropski patentni urad priznal omejitve člena 2(2) direktive o pravnem varstvu biotehnoloških izumov (Direktiva 98/44/ES, direktiva o biotehnologiji) in je na podlagi ustrezne sodne prakse razložil člen 53(b) Evropske patentne konvencije.
In G2/07 and G1/08, the EPO acknowledged the limitations of Article 2(2) of the Directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions (Directive 98/44/EC, the ‘Biotech Directive’) and furthermore interpreted Article 53(b) of the European Patent Convention (EPC) on the basis of relevant case law.
Razširjeni odbor za pritožbe Evropskega patentnega urada je odločil, da je treba postopek pridelave obravnavati kot „v bistvu biološkega“ in ga zato ni mogoče patentirati zaradi člena 4(b) direktive Evropske unije 98/44/ES in ustreznega člena 53b Evropske patentne konvencije, ki izključujeta patentiranje „postopkov za pridobivanje rastlin ali živali, ki so v bistvu biološki.“
EPO’s enlarged Board of Appeal decided that the process for breeding had to be regarded as ‘essentially biological’ and therefore could not be patented because of Article 4 (b) of EU Directive 98/44/EC and the corresponding Article 53b of the EPC, which exclude patents on ‘essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals’.
Vendar ti odločitvi ne rešujeta pravnih vprašanj ali osnovnih problemov pri konvencionalni pridelavi.
These decisions do not solve the legal questions or the underlying problems regarding conventional breeding.
Proizvodi, kot so rastline in sadje, so se obravnavali kot izum.
Products such as plants and fruits were regarded as an invention.
Razlaga evropske patentne zakonodaje kaže, da bi bilo mogoče konvencionalno („v bistvu biološko“) pridelavo patentirati, čeprav je bil postopek pridelave izključen.
This interpretation of European patent law implies that conventional (‘essentially biological’) breeding would be patentable, even if the process for breeding was excluded.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da sedanja praksa Evropskega patentnega urada preširoko tolmači člen 4(b) Direktive št. 98/44/ES?
Does the Commission consider that the current practice of the EPO gives too broad an interpretation of Article 4(b) of EU Directive 98/44/EC?
Ali lahko pojasni pomen člena 2(2) direktive o biotehnologiji?
Could the Commission clarify the meaning of Article 2(2) of the Biotech Directive?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000294/2011
Question for oral answer O-000294/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Vloga podjetij, ki se ukvarjajo z informacijsko in komunikacijsko tehnologijo (IKT) in imajo sedež v EU, pri kršitvah človekovih pravic (zlasti v Siriji)
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Role of EU-based ICT companies in human right violations (particularly in Syria)
4. novembra 2011 so mediji poročali , da italijanska družba Area SpA v tem času opremlja sirsko vlado s tehnologijo za prestrezanje, pregledovanje in katalogiziranje celotnega internetnega prometa v Siriji, in sicer s sondiranjem prometa družb za mobilno telefonijo in ponudnikov internetnih storitev, ki zajema tako domači kot mednarodni promet.
On 4 November 2011 it was reported that the Italian company Area SpA is currently equipping the Syrian government with the technology to intercept, scan and catalogue all internet traffic in Syria by probing the traffic of mobile phone companies and ISPs, capturing both domestic and international traffic.
EU in mednarodna skupnost sta proti sirskemu režimu uvedli gospodarske in ciljne sankcije, ubitih pa je bilo več kot 3.000 državljanov.
The EU and the international community have imposed economic and targeted sanctions against the Syrian regime as over 3 000 citizens have been killed.
Ali je Komisija seznanjena s temi poročili in, če je, kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti na ravni EU za preiskavo in obravnavo teh poslovnih politik?
Is the Commission aware of these reports and, if so, what action has been taken at EU level to investigate and address these business policies?
Če ukrepi niso bili sprejeti, ali Komisija odobrava te poslovne prakse?
If none has been taken, does the Commission approve of these business practices?
Ali smejo družbe s sedežem v EU skladno z veljavno zakonodajo EU (vključno s sankcijami in drugimi veljavnimi omejevalnimi ukrepi) prodajati tehnologije za spremljanje in nadzor vladam, zlasti Siriji, če njihova končna uporaba gotovo vodi v kršenje človekovih pravic?
Under current EU legislation (including sanctions and other restrictive measures in force), are EU-based companies allowed to sell monitoring and surveillance technologies to governments, in particular to Syria, if the end use is certain to lead to human rights violations?
Če je to tako, ali je Komisija pripravljena poiskati dodatne načine, da bi omejila in/ali prekinila tak izvoz?
If so, is the Commission willing to seek additional ways to restrict and/or end these exports?
Ali Komisija lahko razloži delitev odgovornosti med Komisijo in državami članicami glede izvoza tehnologije?
Can the Commission explain the division of responsibilities between the Commission and Member States regarding the export of technologies?