natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kako je vprašanje razorožitve, demobilizacije in reintegracije borcev vključeno v strategijo EU za boj proti nezakonitemu kopičenju ter trgovanju z orožjem malega kalibra in lahkega strelnega orožja, pa tudi pri strelivu zanj?
How is the issue of DDR incorporated into the EU strategy to combat the illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and ammunition for such weapons?
Na kakšen način sodeluje Svet z državami članicami in s Komisijo, da na področju razorožitve, demobilizacije in reintegracije borcev zagotovi največjo možno učinkovitost?
How does the Council cooperate with the Member States and with the Commission in order to ensure maximum efficiency in the field of DDR?
Pri katerih dejavnostih razorožitve, demobilizacije in reintegracije borcev je bil Svet udeležen, na katerih področjih se je to zgodilo, s katerimi mednarodnimi partnerji je Svet sodeloval in kakšni stroški so v zvezi s tem nastali?
In which DDR operations has it been involved, in which regions, in cooperation with which international partners, and what was the financial cost thereof?
Kakšne postopke je pripravil Svet, da bi zagotovil učinkovito izvajanje in ocenil rezultate tovrstnih programov?
What procedures has the Council established so as to ensure efficient implementation and to evaluate the outcome of these programmes?
Kaj se je mogoče naučiti iz tovrstnega ocenjevanja za prihodnje programe?
How are the lessons learnt from such evaluations applied to future programmes?
S kakšnimi težavami se je Svet srečeval oziroma se še srečuje pri izvajanju programa in kaj so razlogi zanje?
What problems has the Council encountered, or is it encountering, in such implementation, and what are the causes of these problems?
V kolikšni meri se programi za razoroževanje, mobilizacijo in reintegracijo razvijajo naprej in kako se vključujejo v misije EU ter evropske varnostne in obrambne politike, na primer misije v Demokratični republiki Kongo, Bosni in Hercegovini, Sudanu in v provinci Aceh?
To what extent are DDR programmes developed and managed as an integrated component of EU ESDP missions, e.g. in DRC, Bosnia/Herzegovina, Sudan and Aceh?
Ali ima EU kot pomembna darovalka vlogo pri pogovorih o standardih za odnose med posameznimi organizacijami in sistemom ZN?
As a major donor, is the EU playing a role in the discussion on interagency standards in the UN system?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0115/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0115/05
Takšne pobude zagotavljajo, da programi EU in drugih darovalcev za ponovno obnovo in razvoj v konfliktnih območjih dejansko lahko vodijo do stalnega miru.
Such programmes are vital in ensuring that EU and other donors’ programmes of reconstruction and development in conflict areas actually can lead to a sustainable peace.
Pri katerih dejavnostih razorožitve, demobilizacije in reintegracije borcev je bila Komisija udeležena, na katerih področjih se je to zgodilo, s katerimi mednarodnimi partnerji je Komisija sodelovala in kakšni stroški so v zvezi s tem nastali?
In which DDR operations has it been involved, in which regions, in cooperation with which international partners, and what was the financial cost thereof?
Kakšne postopke je pripravila Komisija, da bi zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje in ocenila rezultate tovrstnih programov?
What procedures has the Commission established so as to ensure efficient implementation and to evaluate the outcome of these programmes?
S kakšnimi težavami se je Komisija srečevala oziroma se še srečuje pri izvajanju programa in kaj so razlogi zanje?
What problems has the Commission encountered, or is it encountering, in such implementation, and what are the causes of these problems?
Kakšno je stališče Komisije do nadaljnjih prizadevanj kolumbijske vlade, da pridobi sredstva za demobilizacijo paravojaških skupin?
What is the Commission's position on the current efforts being made by the Colombian Government to raise funds for the demobilisation of paramilitary groups?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0116/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0116/05
Zadeva: Podpora EU procesu politične reforme v Egiptu
Subject: EU support for the process of political reform in Egypt
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0117/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0117/05
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0001/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0001/06
Zadeva: 4. svetovni forum o vodi v Ciudad de Mexico (16.-22. marca 2006)
Subject: Fourth World Water Forum in Mexico City (16 to 22 March 2006)
Od 16. do 22. marca 2006 bo potekal v Ciudad de Mexico "4. svetovni forum o vodi", kjer bodo potekale razprave in se bodo postavljale smernice svetovnih političnih odločitev o upravljanju z vodo in njenimi viri.
The Fourth World Water Forum, a platform for discussing and shaping world political decisions on the management of water and its resources, will be held in Mexico City from 16 to 22 March 2006.
Vsaka tri leta ga organizira "Svetovni svet o vodi"(WWC), ki se je sestal že v Maroku (1997), na Nizozemskem (2000) in Japonskem (2003).
It is organised every three years by the World Water Council (WWC) and has met in Morocco (1997), the Netherlands (2000) and Japan (2003).
Čeprav nima nikakršne demokratične legitimnosti, je v resnici "Svetovni svet o vodi" središče ključnih odločitev, ki se zgleduje po Svetovni banki, in ki želi postati svetovno usklajevalno središče za bodoče upravljanje s svetovnimi vodnimi viri.
With no democratic accountability, the World Water Forum is essentially a key-decision-making-body, inspired the World Bank, that sees itself as a centre for the worldwide coordination of the future management of global water resources.
V okviru srečanja v Ciudad de Mexico bo 21. in 22. marca sklicana tudi "Ministrska konferenca" in tudi "regionalne razprave, ločene po celinah".
As part of the Forum in Mexico City, a 'Ministerial Conference' has been called for 21 and 22 March 2006, along with regional discussions, divided by continent.
Nastajajo tako "regionalne posvetovalne mreže" in "regionalni operativni odbor", s pomočjo katerih se izvaja svetovna politika o vodi, brez vsakršne demokratične in državljanske razprave, v Evropi in drugod.
Regional 'Consultation Networks' and 'Operational Committees' have been set up, through which global water policy will be implemented, bypassing democratic debate and citizens, in Europe and elsewhere.
Po uradnih obvestilih Svetovnega sveta o vodi je Evropska komisija popolnoma vključena v delo konference v Mehiki.
According to official information given by the WWC, the European Commission is fully involved in the proceedings in Mexico City.
S kakšnimi pooblastili bo Komisija prisotna v Mehiki, kdo ji jih je podelil in po kakšni politični razpravi v Evropskem parlamentu?
With what mandate, awarded by whom and following which political debate in the European Parliament will the Commission participate in the Forum in Mexico?
Kakšne politične smernice o vodi bo Komisija zagovarjala na 4. forumu v Mehiki?
What political positions regarding water will the Commission be defending at the Fourth World Water Forum?
Ne misli Komisija zagovarjati pristopa - svečano sprejetega v Evropskem parlamentu 11. marca 2004 ob glasovanju "Millerjevega poročila o strategiji notranjega trga - Prednostne naloge 2003-2006", po katerem "glede na to, da je voda skupno bogastvo človeštva, upravljanje z vodnimi viri ne bi smelo biti podvrženo pravilom notranjega trga"?
Does the Commission intend to defend the standpoint, formally adopted by the European Parliament at its vote on 11 March 2004 on the Miller report on Internal Market Strategy - Priorities 2003-2006, that 'since water is a shared resource of mankind, the management of water resources should not be subject to the rules of the internal market'?
Kakšna je strategija Komisije za zagovarjanje dostopa do vode kot temeljne človekove pravice?
What is the Commission's strategy for promoting access to water as a fundamental human right?
Se Komisija strinja s pripravo mednarodne pogodbe, na ravni Združenih narodov, o dostopu do vode kot človekove pravice?
Is the Commission in favour of drafting an international treaty, at UN level, on access to water as a human right?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0002/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0002/06
Zadeva: Sprememba Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah
Subject: Modification of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities
Ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. junija 2005 ( P6_TA(2005)0245 ) o spremembi Sklepa z dne 4. junija 2003 o sprejetju Statuta za poslance Evropskega parlamenta (2005/2124/INI),
Having regard to its resolution of 23 June 2005 ( P6_TA(2005)0245 ) on the amendment of the decision of 4 June 2003 on the adoption of the Statute for the Members of the European Parliament (2005/2124/INI),
ob upoštevanju deklaracije, ki so jo 3. junija 2005 podali predstavniki držav članic na srečanju znotraj Sveta, v kateri so sklenili, da "kadar je instrument, ki določa pravila in splošne pogoje za opravljanje nalog poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, sprejet v skladu s členom 190(5) Pogodbe, je treba preučiti zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta o reviziji ustreznih določb Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti iz leta 1965, v kolikor to zadeva poslance Evropskega parlamenta, da bi se o tem čim prej dogovorili",
Having regard to the Declaration of 3 June 2005 by Representatives of the Member States, meeting within Council, in which they agreed that 'when an instrument laying down the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of duties of Members of the European Parliament is adopted pursuant to the terms of Article 190(5) of the Treaty, they will examine the request of Parliament to revise the relevant provisions of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 1965 insofar as it concerns the Members of the European Parliament with a view to reach a conclusion as soon as possible',
ker je v svoji resoluciji z dne 23. junija 2005 menil, da je deklaracija z dne 3. junija bistveni element za doseganje kompromisa s Svetom glede Statuta,
Whereas its resolution of 23 June 2005 considered that the Declaration of 3 June was an essential element for a compromise with the Council on the Statute,
ker je v svoji resoluciji z dne 23. junija 2005 vztrajal, da morajo " splošni dogovor o Statutu za poslance Evropskega parlamenta sestavljati naslednji elementi:
Whereas its resolution of 23 June 2005 insisted 'that the overall compromise on the Statute for Members of the European Parliament should consist of :
a) ločena in neodvisna ocena dela Statuta za poslance, ki je odvisen od sekundarnega prava, in dela, ki je odvisen od primarnega prava, ter sprejetje obeh delov v skladu z institucionalnimi določbami, ki se uporabljajo za vsakega od delov;
a) a separate and independent examination of that part of the Statute which falls under secondary law and of that part which falls under primary law, and approval of both parts in accordance with the institutional provisions applicable to each of them,
b) ob upoštevanju tistega dela Statuta za poslance, ki je odvisen od primarnega prava, so države članice pozvane k ponovni oceni Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965, ob upoštevanju ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na poslance Evropskega parlamenta, in se pri tem vzame za zgled Statut, sprejet 3. in 4. junija 2003;"
b) with regard to that part which falls under primary law, the Member States are called upon to review the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965 in respect of the provisions relating to Members of the European Parliament, taking the Statute approved on 3 and 4 June 2003 as a model',
Kdaj namerava Svet sklicati medvladno konferenco, da bi tako spremenil Protokol o privilegijih in imunitetah ob upoštevanju določb, ki se nanašajo na poslance Evropskega parlamenta?
When does the Council intend to convene an Intergovernmental Conference in order to modify the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities in respect of the provisions relating to Members of the European Parliament?
Ali bo Svet potrdil dogovor o tem, da bo podlaga za medvladno konferenco Statut, ki ga je Evropski parlament sprejel 3. in 4. junija 2003?
Would the Council confirm the agreement that the basis for the IGC will be the Statute approved by the European Parliament on 3 and 4 June 2003?
Na kakšen način namerava Svet vključiti Evropski parlament v medvladno konferenco?
How does the Council intend to involve the European Parliament in that IGC?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0003/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0003/06
Zadeva: Pravni poklici in splošni interes za delovanje pravnih sistemov
Subject: Legal professions and general interest on the functioning of legal systems
Ali Evropska komisija meni, da posebnost svobodnih poklicev v pravnem sektorju, zlasti odvetnikov, notarjev in davčnih svetovalcev, v primerjavi z drugimi gospodarskimi dejavnostmi, izhaja iz visoke usposobljenosti, ki se zahteva za opravljanje poklica, iz potrebe po vzpostavitvi posebnega odnosa, ki temelji na zaupanju med strokovnjaki in njihovimi strankami, iz njihove vloge pri dostopanju do pravosodja in upravljanju z njim, iz asimetričnih informacij in zunanjih učinkov, ki na splošno vplivajo na opravljanje storitev v pravni stroki?
Does the European Commission consider that the specificity of the liberal professions in the legal sector, notably lawyers, notaries and tax advisers, compared with other economic activities, results from the high qualifications required, the need to establish a specific relationship based on trust between professionals and their clients, their role in access to justice and administration of justice, asymmetric information and the externalities which affect professional legal services in general?
Katere korake in ukrepe za upoštevanje teh posebnosti sektorja načrtuje Evropska komisija?
What are the steps and measures the European Commission plans in order to take into account these specificities of the sector?
Ali Evropska komisija meni, da sta javno urejanje in samo-upravljanje, ki ga po lastni odgovornosti vzpostavljajo poklicna združenja pravnih poklicev, kot so odvetniki ali notarji, ključnega pomena tako za zagotavljanje neodvisnosti poklicev, ki je v uravnoteženem pravnem sistemu nujna, kot za jamstvo kvalitetno opravljenih storitev, pa tudi za vzpostavljanje posebnih vrednostno utemeljenih standardov ter za zagotavljanje, da se ta ureditev strokovno spoštuje in da vključuje poklicno etiko?
Does the European Commission consider that public regulations and self-regulation established by professional associations of legal professions like lawyers and notaries under their own responsibility are of crucial importance to guarantee the independence of the professions that is a necessity in a balanced legal system, to ensure quality of services, to establish special value-based standards and to ensure that those regulations will be observed in a professional manner and include professional ethics?
Kako namerava Evropska komisija upoštevati te ključne točke?
How does the European Commission intend to take into account these crucial points?
Ali Komisija priznava, da sodna praksa Sodišča državam članicam ne preprečuje uveljavljanja obveznih tarif, ker se člena 81 in 82 Pogodbe uporabljata zgolj za protikonkurenčno delovanje, ki ga podjetja opravljajo na lastno pobudo?
Does the Commission recognise that the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice does not prevent Member States from establishing compulsory tariffs because Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty apply only to anti-competitive conduct engaged in by undertakings on their own initiative?
Ali Komisija priznava, da smejo države članice določiti obvezne tarife ter pri tem upoštevati splošni interes, interese potrošnikov in zagotoviti visoke moralne, etične in kakovostne standarde, ki jih odvetniki in notarji predstavljajo, njihove stranke pa vanje zaupajo?
Does the Commission recognise that Member States are authorised to establish compulsory tariffs taking into account the general interest and the interest of consumers and to protect the high moral, ethical and quality standards that lawyers and notaries represent and their clients trust in?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0004/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0004/06
Zadeva: Revizija Cotonoujskega sporazuma in določitev sredstev za 10.
Subject: Revision of the Cotonou Agreement and setting of the amount for the 10th EDF
Na tej točki dogovora ni bilo mogoče doseči deloma zato, ker razprava o vključitvi ERS v proračun Evropske unije in novi finančni perspektivi še ni bila zaključena.
Agreement could not be reached on this point, partly owing to the fact that the debate on the budgetisation of the EDF and on the financial perspectives was still open.
Preden Parlament da svojo privolitev k spremenjenemu Cotonoujskemu sporazumu, je potrebnih še nekaj pojasnitev.
Some clarification is needed before the Parliament can give its assent to the amended Cotonou agreement.
Ali lahko Svet obrazloži znatno zmanjšanje sredstev, ki se zdi v nasprotju s politično zavezo iz leta 2005 o bistvenem povečanju uradne razvojne pomoči (Evropski sveta junija 2005 in julijski vrh G8)?
Could the Council explain the reason for this sizeable reduction, which seems in contradiction with the political commitments made in 2005 to increase substantially official development aid (European Council in June 2005 and the G8 Summit in July)?
Ali lahko Svet nadalje pojasni, zakaj sta bila prispevka Romunije in Bolgarije na zasedanju Evropskega sveta decembra 2005 vključena v ključ razdelitve med državami članicami, čeprav bi moral biti po vstopu obeh držav v Evropsko unijo njun prispevek dodan?
Could the Council further clarify the question of the contribution of Romania and Bulgaria, which were made part of the contribution key between Member States by the December 2005 European Council, whereas their contribution ought to be additional once their EU membership becomes effective?
Kako se po drugi strani upošteva širitev partnerstva AKP na Vzhodni Timor?
On the other hand, how is the enlargement of the ACP partnership to East Timor taken into consideration?
ERS vključevati tudi programski dokument o Afriški uniji?
Should the 10th EDF include a programming document on the African Union?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0005/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0005/06
Zadeva: Položaj evropskega obutvenega sektorja leto dni po liberalizaciji
Subject: Situation of the European footwear sector, one year after liberalisation
S 1. januarjem 2005 so bile odpravljene zadnje omejitve uvoza za obutvene izdelke iz Kitajske in od takrat je dovoljen uvoz v Skupnost vseh obutvenih izdelkov brez omejitev.
On 1 January 2005, the last restrictions on import of footwear from China were removed, and all footwear items have been allowed to enter the Community without restrictions.
Evropska komisija je uvedla dvojni sistem nadzora, ki ima za cilj spremljanje trendov uvoza iz Kitajske, pa tudi iz drugih držav, ki izvažajo v EU.
The European Commission introduced a twofold surveillance system aiming to monitor import trends from China as well as from other exporting countries into the EU.
Zlasti kitajsko blago, ki prihaja v Skupnost, je bilo vključeno v sistem predhodnih uvoznih dovoljenj (tako imenovan predhodni nadzor).
Chinese goods entering the Community were in particular subject to a system of prior import licences (the so-called ex-ante surveillance).
Nadzor, ki ga izvaja Skupnost, je pokazal znatno povečanje uvoza iz Kitajske v letu 2005 (do +500%).
Community surveillance showed that imports from China increased substantially in 2005 (up to +500%).
To je bil hud udarec za konkurenčnost evropskega obutvenega sektorja, ki se ni mogel soočiti s poplavo uvoženega blaga po zelo nizkih cenah.
This severely impacted on the competitiveness of the European footwear sector, which was unable to face the flooding of imported goods at very cheap prices.
Zaradi tega je prišlo do nadaljnjega krčenja obutvenega sektorja v Skupnosti, kar je sprožilo porast števila stečajev in znatno zmanjšanje delovne sile v sektorju.
This led to a further shrinking of the footwear sector in the Community, triggering an increasing number of bankruptcies and a substantial reduction of the sector's workforce.
Poleg tega so bili s trga Skupnosti izrinjeni tradicionalni dobavitelji obutve in sestavnih delov iz tretjih držav, vključno z nekaterimi državami kandidatkami in državami v razvoju.
Furthermore, traditional shoe and component suppliers from third countries, including certain candidate countries and developing countries, have been wiped out from the Community market.
Lani je evropska industrija vložila pritožbo proti Kitajski (in Vietnamu), v kateri trdi, da umetno vzdržuje (vzdržujeta) nizke cene svojega izvoza v Skupnost.
Last year the European industry lodged a complaint against China (and Vietnam) claiming that their exports to the Community were priced artificially low.
Evropska komisija je začela s protidampinško preiskavo.
The European Commission opened an anti-dumping investigation.
Ta preiskava je po svojih razsežnostih in pomembnosti največji protidampinški primer, kar jih je doslej obravnavala Skupnost.
This investigation is, in terms of size and importance, the biggest anti-dumping case ever opened by the Community.
Parlament želi dodatne informacije glede naslednjih vidikov, povezanih s pobudami Komisije v podporo pravični trgovini v obutvenem sektorju.
Parliament wishes to seek further information on the following aspects of the Commission initiatives in support of fair trade in the footwear sector.
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni, kakšne bodo posledice odpravljanja sistema kvot tako za industrijo skupnosti kot za države v razvoju?
Can the Commission comment on the impact of the disappearance of the quota system for both the Community industry and developing countries?
Kako se namerava Komisija soočiti z neizbežnim prestrukturiranjem evropskega obutvenega sektorja?
How does the Commission intend to face up to the inevitable restructuring of the European footwear sector?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje izsledke sistema za spremljanje obutvenih izdelkov?
What is the Commission's assessment of the results of the footwear monitoring system?
Ob upoštevanju, da gre za zaupne primere, ali lahko Komisija na kratko opiše in oceni protidampinško preiskavo, ki trenutno poteka in katere rezultati bodo kmalu objavljeni?
Bearing in mind that cases are confidential, can the Commission provide a short description and an evaluation of the ongoing anti-dumping investigation, the results of which are about to be made public?
Zlasti pa, kakšen je v tem primeru pristop Komisije do "interesa Skupnosti"?
In particular, what is the Commission's approach to 'Community interest' in this case?
Namerava Komisija začeti z dodatnimi mednarodnimi pobudami (podobno, kot se je zgodilo v primeru tekstila) za zaščito obutvenega sektorja pred nepošteno trgovino?
Does the Commission envisage undertaking further international initiatives (similar to what happened to textiles) to defend the footwear sector from unfair trade?
Ali bi Komisija preučila možnost, da se proti Kitajski sproži posebni prehodni zaščitni mehanizem za določene izdelke (TPSSM), če bi tako zahtevale države članice?
If requested by Member States, would the Commission consider whether it would be appropriate to open a TPSSM (Transitional product-specific safeguard mechanism) investigation against China?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0006/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0006/06
Zadeva: Prisilna prostitucija ob športnih prireditvah
Subject: Forced prostitution in the framework of world sports events
Dogodki, kot so olimpijske igre, mednarodni športni dogodki, razstave in kongresi, naj bi povzročali povečano povpraševanje po prostituciji in spolnih storitvah.
Events such as the Olympic Games or international sports events, exhibitions and congresses are said to provoke increased demands for prostitution and sexual services.
Večina vpletenih žensk je žrtev organiziranega kriminala, so pogosto prevarane z lažnimi obljubami o zakonitem delu, nato pa so prisiljene v prostitucijo.
Most of the women concerned are victims of organised crime, often deceived by false promises of legitimate work and then forced to work as prostitutes.