natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Migranti in prosilci za azil so še vedno pridržani v neustreznih razmerah, za migrantske otroke brez spremstva pa ni skoraj nobene podpore.
Migrants and asylum seekers continue to be detained in substandard conditions and there is little or no assistance to unaccompanied migrant children.
Razmere se verjetno ne bodo izboljšale, saj v Grčijo zaenkrat dnevno vstopi 400 ljudi, med katerimi mnogi nimajo osebnih dokumentov, zaradi česar so razmere še bolj zapletene.
This state of play is not likely to improve as Greece now sees the arrival of around 400 people every day, many of them without any identification documents, which makes the situation even more complicated.
Čeprav je Komisija Atenam namenila sredstva, gradnja centrov za migrante ne poteka po načrtu in bo trajala dalj časa, kot je bilo predvideno.
While the Commission has made funding available for Athens, the construction of centres for migrants, for example, is behind schedule and taking longer than expected.
Grški organi naj bi imeli težave pri črpanju evropskih sredstev, namenjenih izboljšanju njihovega sistema za azil.
The Greek authorities seem to have problems in absorbing the European funds earmarked for improving their asylum system.
Kako namerava Svet poskrbeti, da bodo grški organi črpali sredstva, ki so jim bila namenjena, in jih ustrezno porabili ter hitro izboljšali humanitarne razmere v centrih za pridržanje v regiji Evros?
What does the Council intend to do to ensure that the Greek authorities use the resources that have been made available to them, spend the resources appropriately and rapidly remedy the humanitarian situation in detention centres in Evros?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000330/2011
Question for oral answer O-000330/2011
Kako namerava Komisija poskrbeti, da bodo grški organi črpali sredstva, ki so jim bila namenjena, in jih ustrezno porabili ter hitro izboljšali humanitarne razmere v centrih za pridržanje v regiji Evros?
What does the Commission intend to do to ensure that the Greek authorities use the resources that have been made available to them, spend the resources appropriately and rapidly remedy the humanitarian situation in detention centres in Evros?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000331/2011
Question for oral answer O-000331/2011
V Litvi je prepovedano zapisovati imena in priimke v izvirni obliki jezika manjšine ali uporabljati kateri koli jezik razen litovščine v uradnem sporazumevanju, za kršitelje pa je predvidena denarna kazen.
Lithuania does not allow forenames and surnames to be written in the minority-language form (the original-language form) on official documents or any language other than Lithuanian to be used in administrative matters, with non-compliance punishable by a fine.
Litovski jezikovni inšpektorat že nekaj let denarno kaznuje vse fizične osebe, podjetnike in lokalne oblasti, ki uporabljajo dvojezične informativne napise na območjih, na katerih so pripadniki avtohtone poljske manjšine v večini, oziroma predstavljajo do 80 % prebivalstva.
For some years the Lithuanian State Language Inspectorate has been imposing fines on individuals, companies and local authorities for using bilingual signs in places where the indigenous Polish minority accounts for the majority of the population – up to 80% in some areas.
Ti ukrepi so diskriminacijski in v nasprotju s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije (člen 10), Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (člena 21 in 22) in Okvirno konvencijo Sveta Evrope za varstvo narodnih manjšin (členi 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16 in 22) ter popolnoma v nasprotju z Evropsko listino o regionalnih ali manjšinskih jezikih.
These are instances of discrimination, in contravention of Article 10 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Articles 21 and 22 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Articles 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16 and 22 of the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, and in flagrant breach of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages.
Kaj namerava Komisija kot „varuhinja pogodb“ na podlagi pooblastil iz člena 258 PDEU storiti v zvezi s tem vprašanjem?
What action does the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, plan to take, in accordance with the powers assigned to it under Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000332/2011
Question for oral answer O-000332/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Posodobitev carinskega zakonika in uvedba seznama nepreferencialnih pravil o poreklu blaga
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Modernisation of Customs Code and introduction of list of non-preferential rules of origin
Poreklo blaga je trenutno opredeljeno v načelu iz člena 24 carinskega zakonika Skupnosti (Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92), po kateri se blago, ki je bilo proizvedeno v dveh ali več državah, šteje za blago po poreklu iz tiste države, v kateri je bila, v za to opremljenem podjetju, opravljena zadnja bistvena, gospodarsko upravičena predelava ali obdelava, in katere izid je izdelava novega proizvoda ali predstavlja pomembno stopnjo proizvodnje.
Currently the origin of goods is determined by the principle enshrined in Article 24 of the Community Customs Code (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92), according to which goods whose production involved more than one country are deemed to originate in the country where they underwent their last substantial, economically justified processing or working in an undertaking equipped for that purpose and resulting in the manufacture of a new product or representing an important stage of manufacture.
STO si trenutno prizadeva za uskladitev nepreferencialnih pravil o poreklu blaga.
The WTO is undertaking efforts to harmonise the non-preferential origin of goods.
Komisija je na podlagi osnutka STO in v okviru prizadevanj za posodobitev carinskega zakonika oblikovala seznam različnih zavezujočih nepreferencialnih pravil o poreklu blaga.
On the basis of the WTO draft, and as part of efforts to modernise the Customs Code, the Commission has developed different binding rules of origin for non-preferential origin.
Po njenem mnenju bo ta togi seznam prinesel večjo pravno jasnost v zvezi z uvozom ter jasno pravno podlago, zlasti v protidampinških primerih.
According to the Commission, this rigid list of rules will lead to more legal clarity regarding imports and serve as a clear legal basis, especially in anti-dumping cases.
Za podjetja pa bi z uvedbo takih pravil postopek postal veliko bolj kompleksen in zapleten.
For companies, however, their introduction would make the procedure much more complex and complicated.
Ker so bile poprej države izvoznice tiste, ki so opredelile poreklo blaga, bi po predlogu Komisije morala odslej EU sama opredeliti poreklo blaga iz tretjih držav.
Whereas previously the exporting country identified the origin of goods, according to the Commission proposal the EU itself would determine the origin of goods from third countries.
Kako bo ta nadzor potekal?
How will this monitoring take place?
Kako lahko govorimo o večji pravni varnosti za evropske uvoznike, če protidampinški primeri zajemajo le 0,7 % vsega uvoza v EU?
How can we speak of more legal certainty for European importers if anti-dumping cases involve only 0.7% of all imports into the EU?
Glede na skupine proizvodov ali za proizvode, ki so bili uporabljeni za izdelavo proizvodov omenjenih skupin, se lahko pojavijo različni primeri, ko proizvod ni več evropskega porekla.
Depending on the groups of products or on the products which have been used to produce them, various cases may arise where a product is no longer of European origin.
Kako se namerava Komisija spopasti s problemom slabe podobe, ki jo bo to ustvarilo za evropske proizvajalce, in s posledičnim upadom evropske proizvodnje?
How does the Commission intend to counter the image problem which this will create for European manufacturers and the decline of European production?
Komisija glede izvoza predlaga, da se državam uvoznicam omogoči, da uporabljajo lastna pravila o poreklu.
On the export side, the Commission proposes that importing nations should be entitled to apply their own rules of origin.
Kako bi bilo mogoče to izvajati?
How should this be implemented?
Katere vire bo Komisija dala na voljo gospodarskim subjektom, da bi jim pomagala pri izvajanju pravil o poreklu za več kot 190 držav?
What resources will the Commission make available to operators to assist them in implementing the rules of origin for more than 190 countries?
Bo to pomenilo še več birokracije?
Will this not mean even more bureaucracy?
Za uvoženo blago so potrebna pravila o poreklu na ravni EU, za izvoz pa obstaja več možnosti.
For imports, the EU rules of origin are required; for exports, on the other hand, there are more options.
Ali je Komisija pojasnila, ali so različna pravila o poreklu blaga za izvoz in uvoz v skladu z zakonodajo EU in ali so skladna z STO?
Has the Commission clarified whether different rules of origin for exports and imports are compatible with EU law and whether they are WTO-compliant?
Ali je uvedba seznama v skladu s cilji iz Akta za mala podjetja in strategijo EU za internacionalizacijo malih in srednjih podjetij?
Is the introduction of the list in line with the objectives of the Small Business Act and the EU strategy for internationalisation of SMEs?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000333/2011
Question for oral answer O-000333/2011
v imenu Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve Zadeva: Prvi odziv na zeleno knjigo Komisije o izvedljivosti uvedbe obveznic za stabilnost
on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Subject: Initial response to the Commission Green Paper on the feasibility of introducing stability bonds
Kakšni so vmesni rezultati posvetovanja o obveznicah za stabilnost, omenjenega v zeleni knjigi?
What are the interim results of the consultation on stability bonds referred to in the Green Paper?
Kakšne ukrepe je Komisija predvidela na osnovi javnega posvetovanja o zeleni knjigi?
Based on the public consultation on the Green Paper by the Commission, what are the next steps foreseen by the Commission?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje nedavne tržne spremembe in politične dogovore, na primer sklepe Evropskega sveta z dne 8. in 9. decembra 2011, in kateri politični instrument bi bil po njenem mnenju kratkoročno najuspešnejši?
How does the Commission assess the recent market developments and political agreements, such as the conclusions by the European Council on 8-9 December 2011, and what kind of policy instrument would be the most efficient in the short term?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000001/2012
Question for oral answer O-000001/2012
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Neravnovesja v dobavni verigi živil
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Imbalances in the food supply chain
Trg živil trenutno obvladujejo veliki distributerji, cene, ki jih ponujajo kmetom v dobavni verigi, pa nenehno padajo.
The food market is dominated at present by large-scale distributors and the prices that farmers receive in the food supply chain are constantly reduced.
Ker stroški proizvodnje še naprej naraščajo, prihodki kmetov ne zadostujejo več za kmetijsko proizvodnjo, velike veleblagovnice pa ustvarjajo dobiček na njihov račun.
While production costs continue to rise, farmers do not receive sufficient revenue for their production and big supermarkets profit at their expense.
Zaradi velikega razkoraka med ceno, ki jo zahtevajo kmetje, in končno ceno, ki jo plačajo potrošniki, pa tudi zaradi nepreglednosti in zlorab v dobavni verigi živil, postajajo kmetijske dejavnosti vse manj privlačne, preživetje kmetov pa zelo ogroženo.
Due to the large gap between the price paid to farmers and the final price paid by consumers, as well as the lack of transparency and the abuse in the food supply chain, it becomes unattractive to engage in agricultural activity and the survival of farmers is put at a high risk.
Ali namerava Komisija sprejeti kake ukrepe, da bi okrepila pogajalski položaj in moč kmetov v dobavni verigi živil ter zagotovila, da bodo lahko izposlovali višje cene za svoje proizvode?
Does the Commission intend to undertake any measures in order to strengthen the farmers’ bargaining position and power in the food chain and to ensure that they receive a higher final product price?
Ali načrtuje kake predloge za omejitev prevlade velikih trgovcev na drobno in monopolistov?
Does the Commission plan to make proposals aimed at curbing the dominance of large-scale retailers and monopolies?
Ali se namerava posvetiti vprašanju špekulacij s cenami osnovnih živil?
Does the Commission plan to address the problem of speculation in food commodity prices?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000002/2012
Question for oral answer O-000002/2012
Zadeva: Po sprejetju resolucije o EGP-Švica – Ovire pri dokončnem oblikovanju notranjega trga (2009/2176(INI))
Subject: Follow-up to the resolution on EEA-Switzerland – Obstacles with regard to the full implementation of the internal market (2009/2176(INI))
Evropski parlament je 7. septembra 2010 sprejel resolucijo o EGP-Švica: Ovire pri dokončnem oblikovanju notranjega trga ( P7_TA(2010)0300 ).
On 7 September 2010, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on EEA-Switzerland: Obstacles with regard to the full implementation of the internal market ( P7_TA(2010)0300 ).
Resolucija vsebuje več zahtev za Komisijo po izboljšanju sodelovanja med EU in Švico v zadevah notranjega trga.
It made a number of requests to the Commission to improve the cooperation between the EU and Switzerland in internal market matters.
Katere ukrepe je sprejela Komisija, da bi odpravila težave glede podpornih ukrepov, ki malim in srednjim podjetjem iz EU otežujejo zagotavljanje storitev v Švici, ter da bi švicarske oblasti prepričala, naj razveljavijo predpise, ki od tujih podjetij, ki zagotavljajo čezmejne storitve, zahtevajo predložitev jamstva za finančno poštenost?
What actions have been undertaken by the Commission to solve the problems regarding the supporting measures which make it difficult for SMEs from the EU to provide services in Switzerland and to convince the Swiss authorities to repeal regulations which oblige foreign enterprises providing cross-border services to deposit a guarantee of financial probity?
Parlament je v svoji resoluciji izrazil zaskrbljenost zaradi položaja na letališču Zürich-Kloten, kjer so švicarske oblasti nemškim in avstrijskim taksistom prepovedale sprejemanje potnikov.
In the resolution, the Parliament expressed its concerns about the situation at Zürich-Kloten Airport where the Swiss authorities refused to allow German and Austrian taxis to take passengers.
Parlament resno dvomi v skladnost tega položaja s sporazumom o prostem pretoku oseb, zaradi česar je pozval Komisijo, naj to vprašanje temeljito preuči.
The Parliament has serious doubts as to whether this situation is compatible with the Free Movement of Persons Agreement and has therefore urged the Commission to examine this issue thoroughly.
Ali lahko Komisija Parlamentu posreduje najnovejše informacije glede tega konkretnega vprašanja, pa tudi glede splošnega pristopa k tovrstnim omejitvam?
Could the Commission give an update to the Parliament regarding this particular situation as well as its general approach towards this kind of restriction?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen pri oblikovanju takšnih pravil notranjega trga, ki bi gospodarskim subjektom na obeh straneh zagotovila preglednejše in bolj predvidljivo okolje?
What progress has been made in developing internal market rules more apt to provide economic operators from both sides with a more transparent and predictable environment?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen pri iskanju horizontalnih rešitev za nekatere institucionalne težave, npr. razdrobljenost, pomanjkanje preglednosti v sistemu sprejemanja odločitev, nezadostna komunikacija med skupnimi odbori in neučinkovito reševanje sporov?
What progress has been made in finding horizontal solutions to certain institutional problems, e.g. fragmentation, lack of transparency in the decision-making system, insufficient communication between the Joint Committees and ineffective dispute settlement?
Kakšno je stanje pogajanj o prihodnjih odnosih med Evropsko unijo in Švico?
What is the state of play of the negotiations on the future relations between the European Union and Switzerland?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000003/2012
Question for oral answer O-000003/2012
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Posodobitev carinskega zakonika in uvedba seznama nepreferencialnih pravil o poreklu blaga
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Modernisation of the Customs Code and introduction of a list of non-preferential rules of origin
Po njenem mnenju bo ta seznam prinesel večjo pravno jasnost v zvezi z uvozom ter jasno pravno podlago, zlasti v protidampinških primerih.
According to the Commission, this list of rules will lead to more legal clarity regarding imports and serve as a clear legal basis, especially in anti-dumping cases.
Ali lahko sploh še govorimo o večji pravni varnosti za evropske uvoznike, če protidampinški primeri zajemajo le 0,7 % vsega uvoza v EU?
If anti-dumping cases involve only 0.7% of all imports into the EU, is the argument about establishing legal certainty for European importers still valid?
Glede na skupine proizvodov ali za proizvode, ki so bili uporabljeni za izdelavo proizvodov omenjenih skupin, se lahko pojavijo različni primeri, ko proizvod ni več porekla EU.
Depending on the groups of products or on the products which have been used to produce them, various cases may arise where a product is no longer of EU origin.
Kakšno je po ocenah Komisije tveganje zmanjšanja proizvodnje EU?
What is the Commission’s assessment of the risk of a decline in EU production?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000004/2012
Question for oral answer O-000004/2012
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Prispevek skupne ribiške politike k ustvarjanju javnih dobrin
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Contribution of the CFP to the production of public goods
Glavne dejavnosti ribiškega sektorja so pridobivanje, predelava in prodaja rib.
The fisheries sector has as its main activities the production, processing and marketing of fish.
Poleg svoje glavne naloge oskrbovanja trga s kakovostnimi beljakovinami ribiški sektor danes prevzema tudi širšo vlogo in prinaša dodatne socialne, ekonomske in kulturne koristi.
Beyond its main goal of providing the market with high-quality protein, the fisheries sector nowadays plays a wider role bringing additional social, economic and cultural benefits.
Poleg ribolova in z njim povezanih dejavnosti se je ribiška industrija razširila tudi na številna različna področja, kot je ribiški turizem (rekreacijski ribolov), ki spodbuja obalni turizem in s tem širi področje vpliva ribiške industrije na družbeno-kulturno identiteto obalnih skupnosti, ter ribogojstvo z vidika obnavljanja staleža v morjih in rekah ali proizvodnje kakovostnih živil, s katerimi je mogoče oskrbovati evropski trg.
Besides the catching sector and related activities, the fisheries industry has diversified into a number of different branches, such as ‘pescaturismo’ (recreational fishing) – which promotes the coastal tourism sector, thereby broadening the fisheries industry’s spectrum of influence on the socio-cultural identity of coastal communities – and aquaculture, in terms of either repopulating seas and rivers or producing good-quality food products able to supply the European market.
Tako se je v zadnjih desetletjih ribiški sektor izkazal za večfunkcionalnega in je sedaj povezan s široko vrsto dejavnosti, s katerimi je mogoče posredno ali neposredno ustvarjati delovna mesta, spodbujati socialno-ekonomski razvoj obalnih območij in krepiti kulturno dediščino teh regij.
Over the past few decades the fisheries sector has therefore shown itself to be multifunctional, and is now linked to a wide range of activities able to create direct and indirect employment, promote the socio-economic development of coastal areas and enhance the cultural heritage in these regions.
Očiten je njegov vpliv na kulinariko, folkloro, muzeologijo in književnost.
Its influence on gastronomy, folklore, museology and literature is clear.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih dejstev ribiški sektor podpira strategijo Evropa 2020 (strategijo za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast), ki poziva k rasti, ki bo trajnostna (spodbujala z viri učinkovitejše, bolj zeleno in konkurenčnejše gospodarstvo) in vključujoča (spodbujala gospodarstvo z visoko stopnjo zaposlenosti, ki vodi do socialne in teritorialne kohezije); ribiški sektor podpira tudi cilje za bolj okolju prijazno gospodarstvo Rio+20 (COM(2011)0363).
Taking the above-mentioned realities into consideration, the fisheries sector endorses the Europe 2020 Strategy (‘A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’, COM(2010)2020), which calls for sustainable growth (promoting a more resource-efficient, greener and more competitive economy) and inclusive growth (fostering a high-employment economy delivering social and territorial cohesion); the fisheries sector also endorses the Rio+20 green economy objectives (COM(2011)0363).
Se Komisija zaveda večfunkcionalne narave ribiškega sektorja in njegovega prispevka k „javnim dobrinam“, skupaj s prispevkom k strategiji Evropa 2020 in ciljem Rio+20?
Is the Commission aware of the multifunctional nature of the fisheries sector and its contribution in terms of ‘public goods’, along with its contribution to the Europe 2020 Strategy and the Rio+20 objectives?
Kako bo Komisija v reformo skupne ribiške politike vključila dodano vrednost, ki jo ustvarja ribiški sektor?
How will the Commission incorporate the added value provided by the fisheries sector into the CFP reform?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000005/2012
Question for oral answer O-000005/2012
Da bi se spoprijeli s problemom dostopa slepih in oseb z zmanjšano zmožnostjo branja do knjig in drugih tiskanih gradiv, sta Svetovna in Evropska zveza slepih pri Svetovni organizaciji za intelektualno lastnino predlagali zavezujočo mednarodno pogodbo, s katero bi uveljavili namensko odstopanje od avtorskih pravic.
In order to confront the problem of access for blind and print disabled persons to books and other printed products, the World Blind Union and the European Blind Union have proposed an internationally binding treaty at the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) to establish a targeted exception to copyright.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000006/2012
Question for oral answer O-000006/2012
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000007/2012
Question for oral answer O-000007/2012
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Položaj migrantov in prosilcev za azil v Grčiji
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: The situation of migrants and asylum seekers in Greece
Razmere na področju azila so v Grčiji že dolgo skrb vzbujajoče.
The concerns about the asylum situation in Greece are longstanding.
Grški organi so začeli konec leta 2010 izvajati temeljito reformo azilne in migracijske politike ter sprejeli nacionalni načrt za njeno upravljanje.
At the end of 2010 the Greek authorities undertook to implement a thorough reform of their asylum and migration policies and adopted a National Plan on Asylum and Migration Management.
Glede na prvo četrtletno poročilo delovne skupine Komisije za Grčijo (z dne 17. novembra) so dosegli nekaj napredka, med drugim je bila ustanovljena enota za podporo pri prošnjah za azil, povečalo se je število odobrenih prošenj za azil ter ustanovil organ, pristojen za nadzor nad migranti ob njihovem prihodu.
According to the first quarterly report from the Commission Task Force for Greece (17 November), some progress has been achieved, including the creation of a support unit for asylum requests, an increased number of favourable answers to asylum requests, and the setting up of an authority responsible for the oversight of migrants when they arrive.
Vendar je treba storiti še veliko več.
But much more is needed.
Po podatkih nevladnih organizacij, kot sta Zdravniki brez meja in Human Rights Watch, so humanitarne razmere v centru za pridržanje v Evrosu na meji s Turčijo še vedno zastrašujoče.
The humanitarian situation in detention centres in Evros, at the border with Turkey, is still appalling according to NGOs such as Médecins Sans Frontières and Human Rights Watch.