natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 11. oktobra 2004 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu in spremembi pravnega reda Skupnosti: pot naprej (KOM(2004)0651 končno), v katerem Komisija ugotavlja, da "bo po potrebi skupni referenčni okvir pri predložitvi predlogov uporabila kot orodje za izboljšanje kakovosti in skladnosti obstoječega pravnega reda in prihodnjih pravnih instrumentov na področju pogodbenega prava";
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 11 October 2004 on European contract law and the revision of the acquis: the way forward (COM(2004)0651 final), in which the Commission states that it 'will use the CFR as a toolbox, where appropriate, when presenting proposals to improve the quality and coherence of the existing acquis and future legal instruments in the area of contract law',
ker v resoluciji z dne 23. marca 2006 Parlament poudarja, da sploh ni jasno, kakšni bodo praktični rezultati pobude o evropskem pogodbenem pravu ali katera bo pravna osnova, na kateri bodo sprejeti morebitni zavezujoči instrumenti;
whereas its resolution of 23 March 2006 pointed out that it is not clear what the European contract law initiative will lead to in terms of practical outcomes or on what legal basis any binding instrument will be adopted,
ker v svoji resoluciji z dne 23. marca 2006 med drugim zahteva, da Komisija poda izjavo tem, na kakšen način namerava pri svojem nadaljnjem delu upoštevati rezultate delavnic CFR-Neta in raziskovalnih skupin;
whereas its resolution of 23 March 2006 required, among other information, a statement by the Commission on the way in which it proposes to take account of the results of the CFR Workshops and the research groups in its subsequent work,
Ali in v kakšnem obsegu namerava Komisija poleg vprašanj o varstvu potrošnikov v širši skupni referenčni okvir vključiti tudi druga vprašanja s področja pogodbenega prava?
Does the Commission intend and if so, to what extent, to include other contract law issues than consumer issues in a wider CFR?
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti v zvezi s ciljem in pravno obliko skupnega referenčnega okvira?
What are the intentions of the Commission as regards the purpose and the legal form of the CFR?
Ali bi moral biti skupni referenčni okvir zavezujoč instrument in katera naj bi bila pravna osnova takšnega instrumenta?
Should the CFR be a binding instrument and what would be the legal basis for such an instrument?
Ali naj skupni referenčni okvir služi le kot orodje Komisije za nadaljnje zakonodajne predloge?
Or should the CFR only serve as a toolbox for the Commission for further legislative proposals?
Ali Komisija meni, da je treba cilj skupnega referenčnega okvira jasno opredeliti pred oblikovanjem novih zakonodajnih predlogov s področja pogodbenega prava?
Does the Commission consider that the purpose of a wider CFR should be clear before presenting any further legislative proposals related to contract law issues?
Kako namerava Komisija uporabiti rezultate dela raziskovalnih skupin in CFR-Neta na področju pravnih poslov?
How does the Commission plan to bring the results of the work of the research groups and the CFR Net into use in legal transactions?
Katere pravne instrumente s področja pogodbenega prava namerava Komisija predlagati v prihodnje?
What future legal instruments connected with contract law issues does the Commission plan to propose?
Na kakšen način bo Komisija vključila Parlament v razpravo o različnih možnostih v zvezi s skupnim referenčnim okvirom?
How will the Commission involve Parliament in considering the various possible options with regard to the CFR?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0075/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0075/06
Zadeva: Sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta pri delu haaške konference po pristopu Skupnosti
Subject: Involvement of the European Parliament in the work of the Hague Conference following the accession of the Community
Kakšne konkretne korake namerava Svet predlagati ob upoštevanju predlaganega pristopa Skupnosti k haaški konferenci o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu, da bo Parlament vključen v postopke te konference in vprašan za mnenje o osnutku haaških konvencij, zlasti če zadevajo področja, kjer soodloča skupaj s Svetom, in/ali v primerih, ko je Skupnost za določeno področje že sprejela zakonodajo oziroma jo namerava sprejeti?
In view of the proposed accession of the Community to the Hague Conference on private international law, the Council is asked what practical steps it intends to propose in order to involve Parliament in the proceedings of the Conference and consult it on draft Hague Conventions, particularly where they touch on areas where Parliament shares the power of codecision with the Council and/or where the Community has already legislated or is contemplating legislating in the particular area.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0076/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0076/06
Kakšne konkretne korake namerava Komisija predlagati ob upoštevanju predlaganega pristopa Skupnosti k haaški konferenci o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu, da bo Parlament vključen v postopke te konference in vprašan za mnenje o osnutku haaških konvencij, zlasti če zadevajo področja, kjer soodloča skupaj s Svetom, in/ali v primerih, ko je Skupnost za določeno področje že sprejela zakonodajo oziroma jo namerava sprejeti?
In view of the proposed accession of the Community to the Hague Conference on private international law, the Commission is asked what practical steps it intends to propose in order to involve Parliament in the proceedings of the Conference and consult it on draft Hague Conventions, particularly where they touch on areas where Parliament shares the power of codecision with the Council and/or where the Community has already legislated or is contemplating legislating in the particular area.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0077/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0077/06
Zadeva: Vizumske olajšave za države zahodnega Balkana
Subject: Visa facilitation for the countries of the Western Balkans
Evropska unija je državam zahodnega Balkana ponudila jasno možnost članstva v EU, sodelovanje s to regijo pa je okrepila v okviru stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega procesa.
The European Union has given the countries of the Western Balkans a clear membership perspective and is engaged in increased cooperation with the region through the Stabilisation and Association process.
Vendar pa vizumske zahteve, ki jih postavlja Evropska unija, resno omejujejo gospodarsko, družbeno in kulturno izmenjavo.
However, economic, social and cultural exchange is seriously restricted by the visa requirements imposed by the European Union.
Pravila, ki so v veljavi, niso enaka za vse države, posledica tega pa je, da so države zahodnega Balkana danes bolj izolirane kot kdaj koli prej.
The different rules in place vary from one country to the other, but the impact is that the Western Balkan countries are more isolated today than ever before.
Državljani nekdanje Jugoslavije so lahko brez omejitev potovali v zahodno Evropo, medtem ko danes 70 % univerzitetnih študentov v Srbiji še ni potovalo zunaj svoje države.
While for example citizens in the former Yugoslavia were able to travel freely to western Europe, today 70% of university students in Serbia have never been outside their country.
Medtem ko je Evropska komisija pripravila številne predloge za pospešitev in razvoj skupne vizumske politike EU, je celotna slika nejasna in ima nemara tudi nasprotni učinek, saj so ukrepi za vizumske olajšave v nasprotju z nedavnimi odločitvami o vključitvi biometričnih podatkov v vizume ter z uveljavljanjem usklajenih in visokih pristojbin za izdajo vizumov v višini 70 EUR.
While the European Commission has put forward a number of proposals to streamline and develop a common EU visa policy, the overall picture is confusing and arguably counterproductive, as efforts towards visa facilitation measures seem to be in conflict with recent decisions on inclusion of biometrics in visas as well as the setting of harmonised and elevated visa fees at €70.
Ali je Svet pripravljen preučiti možnost za nujni pregled vizumske politike v vseh njenih vidikih, vključno z ukrepi za lažji dostop do vizumov za države zahodnega Balkana, glede na dejstvo, da sta Avstrija, ki zaključuje predsedovanje EU, in Finska, ki ga prevzema, pripisali prednostni pomen razvoju odnosov z državami zahodnega Balkana?
With a view to the fact that the outgoing Austrian and incoming Finnish EU Presidencies have made developing EU relations with the countries of the Western Balkans a priority, would the Council be prepared to consider the urgent need for an overview of visa policy in all its aspects, including measures for facilitated visa access for the countries of the Western Balkans?
Ali se Svet strinja s trditvijo, da mora politika vizumov temeljiti na pristopu, s katerim se postopoma zmanjšujejo omejitve v zvezi s potovanji, in si prizadeva uresničiti svoj dolgoročni cilj, da bi vsem državljanom zahodnega Balkana omogočil potovanja brez vizumov?
Would the Council agree that this visa policy must be based on a step-by-step approach, which gradually eases restrictions on travel, with a view to realising a long-term objective of allowing all citizens of the Western Balkan countries visa-free travel?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0078/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0078/06
Evropska unija je dala državam zahodnega Balkana jasno perspektivo članstva ter se je preko stabilizacijskega in pridružitvenega procesa obvezala okrepljeno sodelovati s to regijo.
The European Union has given the countries of the Western Balkans a clear membership perspective and is engaged in increased cooperation with the region through the Stabilisation and Association process.
Vendar pa vizumske zahteve, ki jih postavlja Evropska unija, resno omejujejo gospodarske, družbene in kulturne izmenjave.
However, economic, social and cultural exchange is seriously restricted by the visa requirements imposed by the European Union.
Pravila, ki so v veljavi, niso enaka za različne države, njihov učinek pa je ta, da so države zahodnega Balkana danes bolj izolirane kot kdajkoli prej.
The different rules in place vary from one country to the other, but the impact is that the Western Balkan countries are more isolated today than ever before.
Medtem ko so lahko državljani nekdanje Jugoslavije neomejeno potovali v zahodno Evropo, danes 70% univerzitetnih študentov iz Srbije še nikoli ni bilo zunaj svoje matične države.
While for example citizens in the former Yugoslavia were able to travel freely to western Europe, today 70% of university students in Serbia have never been outside their country.
Medtem ko je Evropska komisija pripravila številne predloge za pospešitev in razvoj skupne vizumske politike EU, je celotna slika nejasna in ima nemara tudi nasprotni učinek, saj ukrepi za vizumske olajšave delujejo v nasprotju z nedavnimi odločitvami o vključitvi biometričnih podatkov v vizume ter o uveljavitvi usklajenih in visokih pristojbin za izdajo vizumov v višini 70 EUR.
While the European Commission has put forward a number of proposals to streamline and develop a common EU visa policy, the overall picture is confusing and arguably counterproductive, as efforts towards visa facilitation measures seem to be in conflict with recent decisions on inclusion of biometrics in visas as well as the setting of harmonised and elevated visa fees at €70.
Ali bi bila Komisija pripravljena preučiti možnost, da predstavi celovito belo knjigo o vizumski politiki in vseh njenih vidikih, vključno z ukrepi vizumskih olajšav za države zahodnega Balkana?
Would the Commission be prepared to consider presenting an overall White Paper on visa policy in all its aspects, including measures for facilitated visa access for the countries of the Western Balkans?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da mora ta politika temeljiti na postopnem pristopu, s katerim se po določenih stopnjah odpravljajo omejitve za popotovanja, da bi se uresničil dolgoročni cilj, po katerem se vsem državljanom držav zahodnega Balkana omogoči potovati brez vizumov?
Would the Commission agree that this policy must be based on a step-by-step approach, which gradually eases restrictions on travel, with a view to realising a long-term objective of allowing all citizens of the Western Balkan countries visa-free travel?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0079/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0079/06
Pojav nezakonitega priseljevanja se v zadnjih letih povečuje.
The phenomenon of illegal migration has been increasing over the recent years.
Poleti na južne meje EU nenehno pritiskajo nezakoniti migranti, ki jih na ladjah in v obupnih razmerah pretežno iz Afrike prevažajo neusmiljeni trgovci z ljudmi.
In the summer the southern borders of the EU are constantly breached by illegal migrants transported mainly from Africa by merciless merchants of people on boats in desperate conditions.
Evropska unija mora ukrepati na evropski ravni, ker se posamezne države članice ne morejo posamično spoprijeti s to težavo in jo rešiti.
The European Union must take action at European level because single Member States cannot deal with and solve this problem individually.
Potrebna je evropska strategija, da bi to težavo razrešili preko izvajanja partnerstva z državami izvora, sporazumov o politiki vračanja, krepitve nadzora na zunanjih mejah in celovite politike integracije zakonitih priseljencev.
A European strategy is needed to tackle this issue by implementing partnerships with the countries of origin, agreements on the return policy, reinforcements of controls at the external borders and a coherent integration policy for legal migrants.
Kako namerava ukrepati Komisija?
What steps does the Commission intend to take?
Ali Komisija načrtuje morebitne pobude za pogajanja o sporazumih glede politike vračanja EU in za varovanje zunanjih meja EU?
Does the Commission envisage any initiatives for the negotiation of agreements on an EU return policy and for the securing of the EU external borders?
Ali je Komisija odločna zagotavljati ravnovesje med pravicami in dolžnostmi pri razvijanju politik za integracijo zakonitih priseljencev?
Is the Commission firm in granting a balance between rights and duties when developing policies for the integration of legal migrants?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0080/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0080/06
Zadeva: Sistem tarifnih preferencialov EU
Subject: EU system of tariff preferences
V sistemu splošnih preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) EU podpira države v razvoju tako, da njihovemu blagu omogoča lažji dostop do svojih trgov.
Under its Generalised System of Preferences, the EU supports developing countries by giving their goods easier access to its markets.
Nova shema GSP je bila sprejeta 27. junija 2005 z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005 in se uporablja do konca leta 2008.
The EU's recent GSP scheme was adopted on 27 June 2005, through Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 , and will be effective until the end of 2008.
Ta uredba predvideva poseben spodbujevalni režim za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje (tako imenovani "GSP+"), ki omogoča dodatne ugodnosti za države, ki upoštevajo nekatere mednarodne standarde o človekovih pravicah in pravicah delavcev, varstvu okolja, boju proti drogam in dobrem upravljanju.
This regulation also foresees a special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance (the so-called 'GSP+'), which provides additional benefits for countries implementing certain international standards in human and labour rights, environmental protection, the campaign against drugs and good governance.
Države upravičenke se med drugim obvežejo, da bodo ratificirale in izvajale standarde, ki so določeni v konvencijah Mednarodne organizacije dela Združenih narodov (ZN/ILO).
Beneficiary countries commit themselves, among other things, to ratifying and implementing standards enshrined in conventions by the United Nations International Labour Organisation (UN/ILO).
Komisija je v svojem sklepu z dne 21. decembra 2005 odločila, da bo podelila posebno spodbudo petnajstim državam, med katerimi so države, v katerih se dokazano kršijo načela iz konvencije ZN/ILO, še posebej tista, ki varujejo svobodo združevanja, kolektivna pogajanja, nediskriminacijo pri zaposlovanju in prenehanje otroškega in prisilnega dela.
The Commission decided in its decision of 21 December 2005 to grant special incentives to fifteen states, which include countries where there is evidence of systematic violations of the principles laid down in the UN/ILO Convention, especially those which protect freedom of association, collective bargaining, non-discrimination in employment and ending of child and forced labour.
Dokazi o sistematičnih kršitvah držav, ki sodelujejo v GSP+ so zbrani v letnem poročilu Odbora strokovnjakov za izvajanje konvencij in priporočil Mednarodne organizacije dela.
This evidence of systematic violation by countries participating in the GSP+ is documented in the annual ILO report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations.
Ali Komisija ob podeljevanju teh posebnih spodbud zadevnim državam upošteva "Poročilo Odbora strokovnjakov za konvencije in priporočila" Mednarodne organizacije dela za leti 2005 in 2006?
Does the Commission take into account the ILO ‘Reports of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations’ 2005 and 2006 when granting these special incentives to the countries concerned?
Ali bo, glede na te dokaze, Komisija uporabila določbe o začasnem preklicu, določenem v členu 16 Sklepa Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005?
Given this evidence, will the Commission apply temporary withdrawal provisions, as specified in Article 16 of Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005?
UL L 169, 30.6.2005, str.
OJ L 169, 30.6.2005, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0081/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0081/06
Zadeva: Grožnja z zaprtjem Opel/General Motors v kraju Azambuja (Portugalska) in prestrukturiranje, ki trenutno poteka v sektorju avtomobilske industrije v Evropski uniji
Subject: Threatened closure of Opel/General Motors in Azambuja (Portugal) and current restructuring in the car industry in the European Union
Po prejemu javnih finančnih sredstev v višini 40 milijonov evrov namerava uprava General Motors Evropa to tovarno zapreti kljub obljubam, ki jih je poprej dala tako delavcem kot portugalski državi.
After receiving public funding in the order of EUR 40 million, the management of General Motors Europe is seeking to close the plant despite the commitments given to both workers and the Portuguese state.
Delavci so poudarili, da je produktivnost tovarne Opel Portugalska (GM) v Azambuji po standardih samega GM zgledna in da tovarna ustvarja dobiček.
As the workforce has pointed out, productivity at Opel Portugal (GM) in Azambuja is considered exemplary by GM's own standards, and the plant produces a profit.
Katera sredstva Skupnosti so bila odobrena in je zanje zaprosil Opel/GM/Vauxhall Evropa, zlasti Opel/GM Portugalska?
What Community support has been granted to and requested by Opel/GM/Vauxhall Europe and specifically Opel/GM Portugal?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti za zaščito delovnih mest in drugih pravic delavcev?
What action will the Commission take to protect jobs and other workers' rights?
Kakšne ukrepe sprejema glede zagotavljanja informacij in posvetovanja z delavci v Evropski skupnosti in v okviru ureditve javne pomoči na področju regionalne politike Skupnosti?
What measures is it taking in the context of guaranteeing information and consultation of workers in the European Community, and within the framework of the rules on public aid under Community regional policy?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0082/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0082/06
Zadeva: Pripravljenost EU za njeno bodočo vlogo na Kosovu
Subject: The EU's preparedness for its future role in Kosovo
Junija 2005 je Evropski svet oznanil, da je Evropska unija "po zavzetem posvetovanju s ključnimi mednarodnimi akterji pripravljena okrepiti svojo vlogo na Kosovu, potem ko bo določen njegov status."
In June 2005 the European Council declared that ‘In close consultation with key international actors, the European Union stands ready to enhance its role in Kosovo following a status determination.’
Ta izjava je bila ponovno potrjena ob različnih priložnostih.
This statement was reconfirmed on various occasions.
Novembra 2005 je bil Martti Ahtisaari imenovan za posebnega odposlanca generalnega sekretarja Združenih narodov za postopek določanja prihodnjega statusa Kosova.
In November 2005 Martti Ahtisaari was appointed special envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations for the future status process for Kosovo.
Ne glede na točen datum odločitve o končnem statusu pa je Misija Združenih narodov na Kosovu (UNMIK) že začela pripravljati svoj umik s Kosova.
Irrespective of the exact date of a decision on the final status, the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) has already started to prepare its withdrawal from Kosovo.
To pomeni, da bi morala biti Evropska unija pripravljena svojo vlogo na Kosovu prevzeti leta 2007.
This means that the European Union should be ready to take on its role in Kosovo in 2007.
Do takrat pa EU ne bo samo igrala pomembne vloge na področju varnosti in pravice na Kosovu, temveč bo tudi usklajevala delo mednarodne skupnosti v širšem smislu.
By that time, the EU will not only play a prominent role in the field of security and justice in Kosovo, but will also act as a coordinator of the broader work of the international community.
Skupina za načrtovanje Evropske unije (EUPT Kosovo), ki je bila ustanovljena s skupnim ukrepom Sveta 10. aprila 2006, se osredotoča predvsem na vprašanja s področja vladavine prava.
The EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo), which was established by a Council Joint Action on 10 April 2006, focuses mainly on issues in the field of the rule of law.
Na drugih ključnih področjih posredovanja, npr. pri usklajevanju dejavnosti mednarodne skupnosti, vzpostavljanju institucij in kadrov javne uprave, izvajanju zaščite človekovih pravic in zaščite manjšin, pa je raven pripravljenosti nizka.
In other key areas of intervention, such as coordination of the international community's work, capacity building on civil administration, the enforcement of human rights and minority protection, the level of preparedness is low.
Junija 2006, na primer, je imel Urad Evropske komisije za zvezo na Kosovu glede na predstoječe naloge še vedno premalo osebja.
For example, in June 2006 the European Commission Liaison Office in Kosovo was still understaffed in view of the tasks that lay ahead.
Ali se Svet v polni meri zaveda sedanje in bodoče odgovornosti Evropske unije na Kosovu in ali misli, da je Unija dobro pripravljena na svojo tamkajšnjo bodočo vlogo, ki se ji je v preteklosti večkrat zavezala?
Is the Council fully aware of the current and future responsibility of the European Union in Kosovo, and does the Council think that the Union is well prepared for its future role in Kosovo, to which the Union committed itself repeatedly in the past?
Ali Svet meni, da obstaja možnost za okrepitev naporov v pripravah na to nalogo ter za pregledno in konstruktivno sodelovanje z Evropsko komisijo?
Does the Council see a possibility of stepping up its efforts in the preparation of this task and cooperating transparently and constructively with the European Commission?
In na koncu, ali se Svet zaveda, kako pomembno je, da EU svojo bodočo prisotnost na Kosovu organizira na tak način, da bo ta jasno odražala prekinitev z vlogo, ki jo v tem času odigrava UNMIK, katere podoba se je pri lokalnem prebivalstvu v zadnjih letih pokvarila?
Finally, is the Council aware of the importance for the EU of organising its future presence in Kosovo in such a way that it will visibly represent a breach with the current role of the UNMIK, whose image among the local population has been damaged over the past years?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0083/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0083/06
Zadeva: Okvirni pogoji za evropske regulativne agencije
Subject: Operating framework for the European regulatory agencies