natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali ima Komisija s tem v zvezi kakršne koli načrte za sprejem konkretnih ukrepov, ki bi povečali sodelovanje izobraževalnih institucij severnega Cipra v EU in evropskih strukturah, kot je bolonjski proces, in pomenili začetek procesa priznavanja diplom univerz in izobraževalnih institucij iz severnega dela Cipra?
In this context, does the Commission have any plans to take concrete measures to increase the cooperation of educational institutions in northern Cyprus in EU and Europe-wide structures, such as the Bologna process and to commence a process of recognition of diplomas from northern Cypriot universities and educational institutions?
Kateri dopolnilni ukrepi so po mnenju Komisije potrebni za dosego cilja Sveta „končanje osamitve severnega dela in pomoč pri iskanju celovite rešitve za razdelitev otoka“?
What supplementary measures has the Commission identified as needed to reach the Council's objective of ‘putting an end to the isolation of the north and facilitating a comprehensive settlement of the division of the island’?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0109/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0109/06
Zadeva: Začasni sporazum s Turkmenistanom in napredek na področju človekovih pravic, demokracije in načel pravne države
Subject: Interim Agreement with Turkmenistan and progress in the fields of human rights, democracy and the rule of law
Ali Komisija lahko poda najnovejšo oceno v zvezi s sprejetjem oziroma zavrnitvijo začasnega sporazuma o trgovini in trgovinskih zadevah med Evropskima skupnostma in Turkmenistanom glede na razvoj političnih in gospodarskih razmer v Turkmenistanu po uveljavitvi sporazuma leta 1998?
Can the Commission give an up-to-date assessment of the case for and against the approval of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Communities and Turkmenistan in the light of developments in the political and economic situation of Turkmenistan since the Agreement was initialled in 1998?
Ali Komisija razpolaga z jasnimi pokazatelji, da Turkmenistan na poti demokracije in načel pravne države dejansko dosega napredek?
Does the Commission have any clear indications that Turkmenistan is making real progress towards democracy and the rule of law?
Če bo sporazum sprejet, kakšni so "varovalni" mehanizmi Komisije za zagotovitev napredka v dialogu o človekovih pravicah in nasploh na področju človekovih pravic?
If the Agreement were to be approved, what are the ‘safeguard’ mechanisms the Commission has at its disposal to ensure progress in the dialogue on human rights and in the human rights field?
Ali Komisija pri tem namerava v sporazum vključiti klavzulo o letnem pregledu, po kateri bi se redno ocenjeval napredek na področju človekovih pravic?
In this context, does the Commission intend to incorporate into the Agreement an annual review clause whereby progress in human rights can be assessed on a regular basis?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0110/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0110/06
Zadeva: Mirovni proces v Baskiji
Subject: Peace process in the Basque country
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0111/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0111/06
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0112/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0112/06
Zadeva: Odlog pristopa novih držav članic k schengenskem območju
Subject: Postponement of the accession of the new Member States to the Schengen area
Leta 2004 so pri Komisiji izjavili, da bo razširitev schengenskega območja za namen vključitve novih držav članic možna po sprejetju ključnih ukrepov za zavarovanje zunanjih meja območja.
In 2004, the Commission declared that the enlargement of the Schengen area to include the new Member States would be possible after the adoption of vital measures to secure the area’s external borders.
Kot začasni datum pristopa je bil določen oktober 2007.
The provisional date of accession was set for October 2007.
Izjava Komisije iz septembra 2006 pa kaže, da bo datum pristopa zaradi tehničnih in pravnih težav, povezanih z vzpostavitvijo in zagonom schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS) II, preložen na leto 2009.
However, a Commission statement made in September 2006 indicates that the date of accession will probably be put back to 2009 because of technical and legal problems relating to the creation and launch of the Schengen Information System (SIS) II.
So pri Komisiji razmislili o alternativah uvedbi SIS II, kot je na primer vključitev novih držav članic v sedanji sistem (SIS I+)?
Has the Commission considered alternatives to introducing SIS II, such as temporarily including the new Member States in the current system (SIS I+)?
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, katerih?
If so, what conclusions were reached?
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti, da bi ohranila prvotni časovni razpored glede pristopa novih držav članic k schengenskem območju?
What does the Commission intend to do to maintain the original timetable for the accession of the new Member States to the Schengen area?
Povečanje zaupanja javnosti v EU je ključnega pomena.
Boosting public confidence in the EU is vital.
Prosti pretok oseb je praktična izpolnitev temeljnih svoboščin, ki jih zagotavljajo pogodbe.
The free movement of persons is a practical fulfilment of the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Treaties.
Kdaj v bližnji prihodnosti bodo lahko tudi državljani novih držav članic potovali brez mejnih kontrol?
When, in the near future, will citizens from the new Member States also be able to travel without border controls?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0113/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0113/06
Zadeva: Financiranje omrežja Natura 2000
Subject: Financing Natura 2000
Komisija ocenjuje, da je za financiranje omrežja zaščitenih območij EU Natura 2000 potrebno najmanj 6,1 milijarde evrov na leto.
The Commission estimates that at least EUR 6.1 billion is required per year to finance the Natura 2000 network of EU-protected areas.
Komisija predlaga, da morajo sredstva dodeliti predvsem strukturni skladi in skladi za razvoj podeželja ob delni podpori programa LIFE+ ter skladov za ribištvo.
The Commission proposes that monies should be allocated primarily from rural development and structural funds, with some support from the LIFE+ programme and fisheries funds.
Kako namerava Komisija usklajevati svoje generalne direktorate, da bo zagotovila, da bodo omrežju Natura 2000 v obdobju 2007–2013 v resnici namenjena zadostna sredstva iz teh skladov?
How does the Commission intend to coordinate its Directorates-General to ensure that sufficient funding is in practice allocated from these funds over the period 2007-2013 to the Natura 2000 network?
Ali bo Komisija za odobritev sredstev EU za načrte in programe držav članic postavila pogoj, da bo dovolj sredstev namenjenih ustrezno oblikovanim shemam in točno določenim ciljem Nature 2000?
Will the Commission make the approval of Member States' plans and programmes for EU funds conditional on allocating sufficient funds to appropriately designed and targeted schemes for Natura 2000?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0114/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0114/06
Zadeva: Začasni sporazum s Turkmenistanom
Subject: Interim Agreement with Turkmenistan
Ali Komisija lahko poda najnovejšo oceno v zvezi s sprejetjem oziroma zavrnitvijo začasnega sporazuma o trgovini in trgovinskih zadevah med Evropskima skupnostma in Turkmenistanom glede na razvoj političnih in gospodarskih razmer v Turkmenistanu po uveljavitvi sporazuma leta 1998?
Could the Commission give its current assessment of the case for and against the approval of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Communities and Turkmenistan, in the light of developments in the political and economic situation of Turkmenistan since the Agreement was initialled in 1998?
In zlasti, ali Komisija lahko sporoči svoje mnenje glede tega, ali bi bilo dobro pokazati pripravljenost za sprejetje sporazuma kot odziv na določena znamenja, po katerih naj bi bile turkmenske oblasti pripravljene izboljšati položaj na področju človekovih pravic v državi?
In particular, could the Commission say whether it believes it would be desirable to indicate a willingness to approve the Agreement in response to certain signals from the Turkmen authorities of their readiness to improve the human rights situation in that country?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0116/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0116/06
Zadeva: Nadaljnje spremljanje Resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. junija 2003 o raku na dojki v Evropski uniji
Subject: Follow-up to Parliament's resolution of 5 June 2003 on breast cancer in the European Union
Četrta revidirana izdaja smernic EU o presejalnih pregledih za raka dojke na zahtevo EP, podano v resoluciji iz leta 2003, zdaj vključuje smernice EU o specialističnih enotah za bolezni dojk.
The fourth revised edition of the guidelines on mammography screening now contain - as called for by Parliament in its resolution of 2003 - EU guidelines on specialist breast units.
V smernicah se priporoča zaposlitev dveh "medicinskih sester za bolezni dojk" na enoto, čeprav soglasje o usposabljanju teh medicinskih sester še ni bilo doseženo.
The guidelines recommended two nurses for the care of breast disease per unit, although no consensus has been reached on the training required for these nurses.
Je Komisija pripravljena podpreti trenutne dejavnosti za oblikovanje strokovnih standardov za medicinske sestre za bolezni dojk ter te standarde in priporočila objaviti v dodatku k četrti izdaji smernic EU, namesto da bi počakala na dokončanje pete izdaje?
Does the Commission therefore wish to support current activities to develop professional standards for nurses specialising in the care of breast disease and to publish the standards and recommendations in a supplement to the fourth edition of the EU guidelines, instead of waiting until the fifth edition is completed?
Je Komisija na podlagi tega pripravljena izvesti redne in glede na spol specifične informacijske akcije o zdravem življenjskem slogu, v katerih bi poudarila, da samopregledovanje dojk ne more nadomestiti pregledov z mamografijo?
Does the Commission, therefore, intend to use regularly repeated information campaigns on healthy life-style, aimed at women, to highlight the fact that breast self-examination cannot be a substitute for mammography screening?
Kakšne načrte ima Komisija, poleg možnosti rabe strukturnih skladov, za zagotavljanje potrebne pomoči pri izvedbi visokokakovostnih presejalnih programov v novih državah članicah EU in državah pristopnicah?
What plans does the Commission have to provide appropriate support, together with the option of using the Structural Funds, in order to implement high-quality screening programmes in the new Member States and the applicant States?
UL C 68 E, 18.3.2004, str.
OJ C 68 E, 18.3.2004, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0117/06/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0117/06/rev.1
Zadeva: Pravočasno posredovanje in preverjanje statističnih podatkov, ki jih je posredovala Madžarska
Subject: Timely transmission and verification of statistical data provided by Hungary
Po priznanju madžarskega predsednika vlade, ki je postalo javno po tem, ko so v sredini septembra prišli na dan magnetofonski zapisi, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bili podatki (vključno z napovedmi), poslani evropskim institucijam v okviru nadzornega sistema ЕMU, napačni.
In the wake of the admission by the Hungarian Prime Minister in a leaked tape-recording in mid-September, it was revealed that the data (including the forecasts) sent to the European institutions in the context of the surveillance system of the Economic and Monetary Union were not correct.
Ni prvič, da je v zgodovini EU država članica zagrešila "ustvarjalno interpretacijo" pri podajanju proračunskih podatkov, s tem, da je prikrila dodatne javne izdatke.
It is not the first time in the history of the EU that a Member State has submitted a creative interpretation of budgetary data, by hiding additional public expenditure.
Vendar pa je razlika v primerjavi z Grčijo in drugimi državami v tem, da ti primeri niso imeli za posledico finančne krize, ki so ji sledi drastični ukrepi omejevanja uporabe v zadevni državi članici.
But the marked difference in comparison with the Greek and other examples lies in the fact that those cases did not result in a financial crisis followed by drastic austerity measures in the Member State concerned.
Poleg proračunske krize, ki je nastala na Madžarskem, se je v okviru Evropske unije pojavilo tudi vprašanje glede verodostojnosti vloge Komisije pri preverjanju podatkov in napovedi, ki jih posredujejo nacionalni statistični uradi in oblasti.
In addition to the budgetary crisis created inside Hungary, a credibility problem arose for the European Union with regard to the Commission's role in verifying data and forecasts transferred from national statistical and government bodies .
Zakaj Komisija ni po izkušnjah z Grčijo, Portugalsko in Malto ter ostalimi državami opazila, da so bile proračunske napovedi, ki jih je madžarska vlada posredovala od pridružitve maja 2004, neresnične, zlasti kar se tiče vedno večje diskrepance, ki je julija 2006 dosegla svoj višek?
Why did the Commission not realise, after the experiences of Greece, Portugal, Malta and others, that the budgetary forecasts provided by the Hungarian government after its accession in May 2004 were unrealistic, especially considering the extent of discrepancy that went on to be revealed, culminating in July 2006?
Zakaj je Komisija maja 2006 sprejela spomladansko napoved, čeprav so bile napovedi raziskovalnih inštitutov, bonitetnih agencij in madžarske centralne banke drugačne?
Why did the Commission adopt the Spring Forecast in May 2006 against the predictions of forecast institutions, rating agencies and the National Bank of Hungary?
Ali Komisija meni, da je naredila vse, kar je bilo v njeni moči, ali pa ji je treba dati večja pooblastila in/ali sredstva, da bo lahko pravilno opravljala svoje naloge?
Does the Commission consider that it did all it could possibly do, or should further powers and/or resources be given to the Commission so that it can carry out its tasks properly?
Zakaj je Komisija predlagala Svetu, da Madžarski odobri izredno podaljšanje roka za predložitev svojega prenovljenega konvergenčnega programa, s čimer je dejansko omogočila vladi, da je objavila podatke šele julija, kar je pripeljalo do zaskrbljujočega proračunskega primanjkljaja, ki je nastal v toku leta?
Why did the Commission propose to the Council to grant Hungary an extraordinary extension of the deadlines for presenting its renewed convergence programme, which de facto allowed the Government not to publish data until July, resulting in a serious budget deficit materialising in the course of the year?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0118/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0118/06
Zadeva: Igre na srečo in športne stave na notranjem trgu
Subject: Gambling and sports betting in the Internal Market
Odbor IMCO se je seznanil s sklepom Evropske komisije z dne 4. aprila 2006, da sproži postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev glede omejitev na trgih športnih stav, ki naj ne bi bile skladne s členom 49 Pogodbe ES (svoboda zagotavljanja storitev).
The IMCO Committee takes note of the European Commission’s decision of 4 April 2006 to launch infringement procedures concerning restrictions imposed on sports betting markets which are deemed to be incompatible with article 49 TEC (freedom to provide services).
Poleg tega se je odbor IMCO seznanil s posebnim poročilom evropskega varuha človekovih pravic z dne 30. maja 2006, kjer kritizira ravnanje Evropske komisije v primeru kršitev pri igrah na srečo ter poudarja, da Komisija nima pravice odlašati z obravnavo pritožbe zaradi kršitev, ker ne more doseči političnega soglasja o nadaljnjem ravnanju.
Furthermore, the IMCO Committee notes the EU Ombudsman's special report issued on 30 May 2006, criticising the European Commission's handling of a gambling infringement case and emphasising that the Commission is not entitled to delay in dealing with an infringement complaint on the grounds that it is unable to find a political consensus on how to proceed.
Odbor IMCO tudi opozarja na sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi Gambelli in drugi, C-243/01, novembra 2003.
The IMCO committee also recalls the ruling of the European Court of Justice in case C-243/01 'Gambelli and others' of November 2003.
Kako potekajo postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev, sproženi 4. aprila 2006, in kako namerava ukrepati Komisija?
What is the progress on the infringement proceedings launched on 4 April 2006 and what are the next steps planned by the Commission?
Ali namerava Evropska komisija postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev omejiti le na področje športnih stav ali načrtuje nadaljnje ukrepe tudi na drugih področjih, povezanih z igrami na srečo, kjer so bile ugotovljene diskriminacijske prakse?
Does the European Commission intend to restrict the infringement procedures only to the sports betting sector or does it envisage further actions in other gambling-related sectors where discriminatory practices are identified?
Katere pobude pripravlja Komisija za oblikovanje pravnega okvira elektronskih iger na srečo, s pomočjo katerega bodo države članice lahko varovale potrošnike in ščitile mladoletnike ter hkrati omogočile zakonito poslovanje uglednim podjetjem?
What initiatives is the Commission preparing to develop a legal framework for on-line gambling that will allow Member States to safeguard consumers and protect minors while allowing legitimate operations by reputable firms?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0119/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0119/06
Zadeva: Učinki podpisa Haaške konvencije o vrednostnih papirjih
Subject: Implications of signing the Hague Securities Convention
Potem ko je Evropska komisija predložila svojo pravno oceno, Svet trenutno odloča o tem, ali naj se Evropska unija odloči za podpis Haaške konvencije o vrednostnih papirjih.
Following the release by the European Commission of its Legal Assessment, the Council is currently in the process of deciding if the European Union should or should not decide to sign the Hague Securities Convention.
Ker je konvencija zelo pomembna za evropske vlagatelje in udeležence na trgu, Parlament meni, da je bil premalo vključen v razpravo o tej odločitvi.
Given the major importance of the Convention for European investors and market participants, the European Parliament considers that it is insufficiently involved in the debate on this decision.
Pomemben cilj Evropskega parlamenta na tem področju je zaščita učinkovitosti in jasnosti sedanjega evropskega predpisa v zvezi s pravnim nasprotjem o lastništvu vrednostnih papirjev.
The European Parliament, on this issue, has one major goal: that the efficiency and the clarity of the current European rule relating to the conflict of law on securities holdings can be protected.
Res je, da je postopek soodločanja v preteklih letih uspešno vzpostavil enoten predpis glede pravnih nasprotij, ki kot veljavno pravo opredeljuje pravo države članice, kjer je račun odprt.
Indeed, the codecision process, in recent years, succeeded in creating one unified rule on conflict of law for Europe, which determines the applicable law as the law of the Member State where the account is located.
Udeleženci na trgu, države članice in Evropska komisija priznavajo, da je formula lokacije računa učinkovita na notranjem trgu.
Market participants, Member States and the European Commission all recognise that the ‘location of account’ formula works efficiently in the internal market.
Nepriznavanje veljavnosti takšnega osnovnega pravila in zagovarjanje njegove nadomestitve s prosto izbiro veljavne zakonodaje s strani imetnika računa vrednostnih papirjev bi zagotovo odprlo tudi pandorino skrinjico pri prosti izbiri veljavne zakonodaje za gotovinske račune.
Not recognising the validity of such a basic rule and advocating its replacement by a free choice of applicable laws by the parties of a securities account would certainly open the ‘Pandora's box’ of free choice of the applicable law for cash accounts as well.
Prav tako bi bilo skoraj provokativno uvajanje predpisa o domnevni nezmožnosti lokalizacije računa vrednostnih papirjev, medtem ko se od nekaterih držav zahteva, da izvajajo vedno strožjo zakonodajo v zvezi s pranjem denarja, zlorabami trga, preglednostjo in upravljanjem družb.
Moreover, while any country is asked to implement more and more strict legislation relating to money laundering, market abuses, transparency and corporate governance, establishing a rule on the alleged impossibility to localise securities accounts may be almost considered as rather provocative.
Ali Svet podpira Parlament pri poskusu, da bi v celoti zaščitil izvajanje formule lokacije računa?
Does the Council share this objective of the Parliament to try to fully protect the application of the ‘location of account’ formula?
Ali je Svet poskusil najti način za nadaljnjo uporabo formule lokacije računa za evropske račune, preden bi se EU zavezala k podpisu Konvencije, ki pa zagotavlja prosto izbiro veljavnega prava za račune, odprte izven EU?
Before committing the EU to signing the Convention, has the Council actually tried to find a means to continue to apply the ‘location of account’ formula for European accounts while reserving the Convention's free choice of applicable law for accounts held outside the EU?
Ali lahko Svet razloži, kako je lahko EU podpisala konvencijo, ne da bi pred tem izvedla resnično oceno ekonomskih in poslovnih vplivov?
Could the Council explain how it could commit the EU to signing the Convention without having carried out a true economic and business impact assessment of it?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0120/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0120/06
Ali Evropska komisija podpira Parlament pri poskusu, da bi v celoti zaščitil izvajanje formule lokacije računa?
Does the Commission share this objective of the Parliament to try to fully protect the application of the ‘location of account’ formula?
Ali je Evropska komisija poskusila najti način za nadaljnjo uporabo formule lokacije računa za evropske račune, preden bi se EU zavezala k podpisu Konvencije, ki pa zagotavlja prosto izbiro veljavnega prava za račune, odprte izven EU?
Before committing the EU to signing the Convention, has the Commission actually tried to find a means to continue to apply the ‘location of account’ formula for European accounts while reserving the Convention's free choice of applicable law for accounts held outside the EU?
Ali lahko Evropska komisija razloži, kako je lahko EU podpisala konvencijo, ne da bi pred tem izvedla resnično oceno ekonomskih in poslovnih vplivov?
Could the Commission explain how it could commit the EU to signing the Convention without having carried out a true economic and business impact assessment of it?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0121/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0121/06
Zadeva: Zahteva za podaljšanje veljavnosti oprostitve trošarine na rdeče obarvano dizelsko gorivo za plovila za zasebne namene (v direktivi Sveta 2003/96/ES)
Subject: Request for the continuation of the exemption from charging full excise duty on red diesel for leisure boaters under Council Directive 2003/96/EC
Trenutno je z odstopanji v direktivi Sveta 2003/96/ES petim državam, vključno s Finsko, Irsko, Malto in Združenim kraljestvom, omogočeno obračunavanje znižanih stopenj trošarine na rdeče obarvano dizelsko gorivo za plovila za zasebne namene.
Currently, derogations in Council Directive 2003/96/EC allow five countries, including Finland, Ireland, Malta and the United Kingdom, to charge reduced rates of excise duty on red diesel, applying only to private pleasure watercraft.
Veljavnost teh izjem poteče 31. decembra 2006.
These exemptions are due to expire on 31 December 2006.
Če bi jih ukinili, bi lastnike plovil prisilili, da uporabljajo dizelsko gorivo, obdavčeno po nacionalni stopnji, torej bi bili soočeni z občutnim dvigom cen, zaradi česar bi se številni morali nehati ukvarjati s tem športom.
However, if the current derogations were to be abolished, forcing boat owners to fill up with diesel taxed at national rates, boaters would face considerable price increases, forcing many of them out of their sport.