natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
18. junija so mediji poročali o tem, da naj tedanji predsednik Kwašniewski ne bi bil seznanjen z zapori CIE in da je, ko je odkril njihov obstoj, ukazal njihovo zaprtje, ter da preiskovalci nadaljujejo s preiskavami, tudi v zadevi Halida Šejka Mohameda.
On 18 June the media reported that then President Kwasniewski was allegedly not aware of CIA prisons, ordering their closure when he discovered their existence, and that prosecutors were continuing the enquiry, including the investigation into Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
Kaj je ukrenil, da bi izrazil nasprotovanje EU smrtni kazni v zadevi al–Naširi?
What has it done to express the EU’s opposition to the death penalty in the case of Al-Nashiri?
Ali se strinja, da bi morala EU zaščititi vse posameznike pred smrtno kaznijo, mučenjem, samovoljnim odvzemom prostosti in prisilnim izginotjem, med drugim z zagotavljanjem, da se preiskave domnevnih kršitev človekovih pravic ne preprečujejo in da se odgovornim sodi?
Does it agree that the EU should protect all persons against the death penalty, torture, arbitrary detention and enforced disappearances, including by ensuring that inquiries into alleged human rights violations are not blocked and that those responsible are brought to justice?
S kakšnimi ukrepi namerava zagotoviti, da se v Evropi doseže pravica za žrtve programov izrednih izročitev in skrivnih zaporov CIE?
What is it doing to ensure that justice is done in Europe for victims of the CIA extraordinary rendition and secret detention programmes?
Domneve namigujejo na obstoj „črnega območja“ v obveščevalni bazi Stare Kiejkuty v bližini letališča Szymany.
Allegations hint at the existence of a ‘black site’ at the Stare Kiejkuty intelligence base, near Szymany airport.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000196/2011
Question for oral answer O-000196/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Tveganje smrtne kazni v ZDA za žrtve izrednih izročitev in skrivnih zaporov CIE na Poljskem
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Risk of the death penalty in the US for victims of CIA extraordinary renditions and secret prisons in Poland
27. oktobra 2010 je poljski tožilec v poljski preiskavi o skrivnih zaporih CIE uradno priznal al-Naširija kot žrtev, potem ko je 20. januarja 2011 enako storil že za Abu Zubajdo.
On 27 October 2010, the Polish Prosecutor officially recognised al-Nashiri – after doing the same on 20 January 2011 for Abu Zubaydah – as a victim in Poland’s CIA secret prison investigation.
Kaj je ukrenila, da bi izrazila nasprotovanje EU smrtni kazni v zadevi al-Naširi?
What has it done to express the EU’s opposition to the death penalty in the case of Al-Nashiri?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000197/2011
Question for oral answer O-000197/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Trgovina med EU in Tajvanom
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: EU-Taiwan trade
Trgovinska strategija EU poudarja, da je treba za spodbujanje notranje rasti čim bolje izkoristiti trgovinske odnose s trgi v vzponu, zlasti azijskimi.
The EU's trade strategy emphasises the need to capitalise on trade relations with ‘growth markets’, especially in Asia, in order to generate internal growth.
Vendar potencial trgovinskih in naložbenih odnosov med EU in Tajvanom še ni bil v celoti izkoriščen.
However, the EU’s trade and investment relationship with Taiwan has not achieved its full potential.
Kakšen je pomen trgovinskih in naložbenih odnosov s Tajvanom za evropsko strategijo 2020?
What is the importance of the trade and investment relationship with Taiwan for the Europe 2020 strategy?
Katere instrumente in ukrepe bi morala EU uporabiti, da bi izboljšala trgovinske in naložbene pogoje v odnosu s Tajvanom?
What instruments and measures should the EU use to improve terms of trade and investment with Taiwan?
Kakšna je ocena Komisije o razvoju odnosov med Tajvanom in Kitajsko po sprejetju okvirnega sporazuma o gospodarskem sodelovanju leta 2010?
What is the Commission’s assessment of recent developments in relations between Taiwan and China following the conclusion of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement in 2010?
Kakšne nove priložnosti bodo ti dogodki prinesli evropskim podjetjem?
What opportunities will these developments bring for European businesses?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi lahko začela pogajanja na visoki ravni s Tajvanom o krepitvi trgovinskih in naložbenih vezi?
Has the Commission considered initiating high-level negotiations with Taiwan on deepening trade and investment ties?
Kakšna je ocena Komisije o možnostih za začetek pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu ali predhodno študijo?
What is the Commission’s assessment of the feasibility of launching negotiations on a free trade agreement or a scoping exercise?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000198/2011
Question for oral answer O-000198/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Razlike v kakovosti proizvodov iste blagovne znamke z isto embalažo
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Differences in the quality of products with the same brand and packaging
V medijih so poročali o rezultatih različnih raziskav, s poudarkom na specifičnem vprašanju, povezanem s kakovostjo izdelkov.
The findings of various surveys have been reported in the media, drawing attention to a specific issue relating to product quality.
Gre za številne primere razlik v kakovosti proizvodov iste blagovne znamke z isto embalažo, ki se prodajajo na enotnem trgu, pri čemer so proizvodi višje kakovosti namenjeni na trge zahodnoevropskih držav in proizvodi nižje kakovosti na trg srednje- in vzhodnoevropskih držav.
It concerns numerous cases of differences in the quality of products with the same brand and the same packaging which are distributed in the Single Market: higher-quality products are directed to west European markets, and lower-quality products to central and east European markets.
To vprašanje ne zadeva le kakovosti in varnosti teh izdelkov, pomeni tudi resno diskriminacijo evropskih potrošnikov s kršenjem obstoječe evropske zakonodaje, ki določa, da prodajalec ne sme ustvarjati diskriminacije med potrošniki pri prodaji izdelkov ali zagotavljanju storitev.
This issue does not relate simply to the quality and safety of such products, but also constitutes serious discrimination against European consumers insofar as it breaches existing EU legislation stating that a seller must not discriminate between customers when selling products or providing services.
Diskriminacija temelji na dejstvu, da potrošniki nekaterih držav članic EU nimajo dostopa do iste ravni kakovosti izdelkov iste znamke z isto embalažo, ki so na voljo drugod na notranjem trgu, ampak imajo dejansko dostop le do izdelkov nižje kakovosti.
It may be classed as discrimination, given that consumers in different Member States do not enjoy access to the same level of quality when buying products with the same brand and packaging as those distributed elsewhere in the internal market: in practice, consumers in certain Member States have access only to lower-quality products.
V skladu s pošteno poslovno prakso bi bilo treba izdelke nižje kakovosti iste znamke prodati po nižjih cenah, kakovost in sestava izdelkov pa bi morala biti jasno navedena.
Fair commercial practices dictate that lower-quality products of the same brand should be sold at lower prices, and that the quality and composition of products should be clearly indicated.
Pozivamo Komisijo, naj izvede pomembno preiskavo o tem vprašanju ob upoštevanju ciljev varstva potrošnikov in potrošnikovih pravic v smislu kakovosti in varnosti izdelkov.
We call on the Commission to carry out a meaningful investigation into this issue, bearing in mind consumer protection objectives and consumer rights in respect of product quality and safety.
Ali Komisija soglaša, da tovrstna praksa pomeni resno kršenje pravil o notranjem trgu in varstvu potrošnikov?
Does the Commission agree that such practices constitute a serious breach of internal market and consumer protection rules?
Katere ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela s tem v zvezi?
What action and measures does the Commission intend to take in this connection?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000199/2011
Question for oral answer O-000199/2011
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Razmere v vzhodnem Sredozemlju
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Situation in the eastern Mediterranean
Ciper in Izrael sta pred kratkim izjavila, da nameravata v svojih izključnih ekonomskih conah začeti iskati nafto.
Cyprus and Israel have recently declared their intention to begin oil exploration in their respective exclusive economic zones.
To vodi do vse večje napetosti v vzhodnem Sredozemlju, ki je na zunanji meji EU.
This is leading to rising tensions in the eastern Mediterranean, which is on the EU’s external borders.
Turčija je v odgovor na namere Cipra in Izraela, da bosta vrtala in iskala nafto, zagrozila, da bo v teritorialne vode EU poslala svojo pomorsko floto in bojne ladje.
In response to Cyprus and Israel’s stated intention to drill for oil, Turkey has threatened to send its naval fleet and warships into EU waters.
Do teh dogodkov prihaja manj kot mesec po zadnjih razgovorih o ponovni združitvi Cipra, ki so pod okriljem ZN potekali v New Yorku.
This comes less than a month before the final UN-sponsored talks on Cypriot reunification in New York.
Poleg tega lahko ti dogodki, ob upoštevanju nedavnega spora med Turčijo in Izraelom in prekinitve diplomatskih odnosov, dodatno omajajo in destabilizirajo razmere v vzhodnem Sredozemlju in morebiti ogrozijo pogovore o ponovni združitvi Cipra.
Moreover, given Turkey’s recent spat with Israel and the suspension of diplomatic relations, these developments threaten to further unsettle and destabilise the eastern Mediterranean, as well as potentially jeopardise talks on Cypriot reunification.
Združene države Amerike in Ruska federacija so izrazile podporo Cipru in Izraelu z izjavo, da ima vsaka suverena država pravico, da razišče svoje energetske vire.
The United States of America and the Russian Federation have expressed their support for Cyprus and Israel, stating that every sovereign state has the right to explore energy resources.
Poleg tega zahteve Turčije niso v skladu z mednarodnim pravom, saj ta država ni podpisnica konvencije ZN o pomorskem pravu (konvencije UNCLOS).
Furthermore, Turkey’s claims are outside the scope of international law, as the country is not a signatory of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
Zahteve Turčije so torej po mednarodnem pravu sumljive, njeni nameni v vzhodnem Sredozemlju pa nasprotujejo poročilu preiskovalnega odbora generalnega sekretarja ZN o dogodku v zvezi s flotiljo 31. maja 2010.
Turkey’s claims under international law are thus doubtful, and its intentions in the eastern Mediterranean run counter to the report of the UN Secretary-General’s Panel of Inquiry on the flotilla incident of 31 May 2010.
Ali namerava visoka predstavnica za zunanje zadeve/podpredsednica Komisije, ob upoštevanju nedavnih dogodkov, dati uradni odgovor in/ali uradno izjavo o teh dogodkih v vzhodnem Sredozemlju in na zunanjih mejah EU?
Given recent developments, does the High Representative for Foreign Affairs/Vice-President of the Commission intend to issue an official response and/or statement on these developments in the eastern Mediterranean and on the EU’s external borders?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000200/2011
Question for oral answer O-000200/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Varnostni skenerji
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Security Scanners
Komisija je predlagala, naj tudi telesni skenerji postanejo dovoljen način pregledovanja potnikov na letališčih v EU, ter izvedbene ukrepe, ki državam članicam dovoljujejo uporabo skenerjev, ki slikajo človekovo telo, slika pa gre v pregled nadzorni osebi, vendar ni posebej poudarjeno, da morajo biti slike zamegljene ali v obliki orisa, kot je zahteval Parlament v odstavku 27 svoje resolucije P7_TA(2011)0329 , sprejete v juliju 2011.
The Commission has proposed to include body scanners among the permitted methods for screening of passengers in EU airports, together with implementing measures that allow Member States to use scanners producing images of a person's body that are to be analysed by a human reviewer, without specifying that these images shall be blurred or be in the form of stick-figures, as requested by the European Parliament in paragraph 27 of its report P7_TA(2011)0329 , adopted in July 2011.
Ali Komisija ne meni, da predlog resno posega v pravico do zasebnosti in varstva podatkov državljanov EU?
Does the Commission not think that the proposal has a serious impact on the right to privacy and to data protection of EU citizens?
Ali ne meni, da se večja varnost na letališčih lahko doseže brez ukrepov, ki tako globoko posegajo v človekovo zasebnost, predvsem z uporabo drugih tehnik, ki ščitijo potnikovo identiteto in zagotavljajo, da ga ni mogoče prepoznati prek slik njegovega telesa?
Does it not think that the objective of higher security at airports could be reached without such intrusive measures, notably by using other techniques that protect passengers’ identities and ensure that they cannot be identified by images of their body?
Ali Komisija ne meni, da bi bilo treba zavezujoče ukrepe, ki imajo tako velike posledice za temeljne pravice državljanov, sprejeti z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom, ki predvideva ustreznejšo vključitev Evropskega parlamenta in zagotavlja, da so sklepi objavljeni in pregledni, zlasti za državljane EU, kot zahteva odstavek 56 njegovega poročila P7_TA(2011)0329 , sprejetega v juliju 2011?
Does the Commission not think that binding measures that have such an impact on citizens’ fundamental rights should always be adopted through the ordinary legislative procedure, which allows for the European Parliament to be involved in a more appropriate way and ensures the required transparency and publicity of decisions, notably for EU citizens, as requested in paragraph 56 of its report P7_TA(2011)0329 , adopted in July 2011?
Kako bo zagotovljeno varstvo osebni podatkov, ki se obdelajo na letališčih z uporabo telesnih skenerjev?
How will the security of the personal data treated at airports by body scanners be guaranteed?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000201/2011
Question for oral answer O-000201/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Telesni skenerji
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Body scanners
Komisija je predlagala, naj tudi telesni skenerji postanejo dovoljen način pregledovanja potnikov na letališčih v EU, ter izvedbene ukrepe, ki državam članicam dovoljujejo uporabo skenerjev, ki slikajo človekovo telo, slika pa gre v pregled nadzorni osebi, vendar ni razloženo, da morajo biti slike zamegljene ali v obliki orisa, kot je zahteval Parlament v odstavku 27 svoje resolucije P7_TA(2011)0329 , sprejete v juliju 2011.
The Commission has proposed adding body scanners to the permitted methods for screening passengers in EU airports, together with implementing measures that allow Member States to use scanners producing images of a person’s body which will be analysed by a human reviewer, without specifying that these images shall be blurred or in the form of stick-figures, as requested by Parliament in paragraph 27 of its resolution P7_TA(2011)0329 adopted in July 2011.
Ali Komisija ne meni, da predlog resno posega v potnikovo pravico do zasebnosti in varstva podatkov?
Does the Commission not think that the proposal has a serious impact on the right to privacy and to passenger data protection?
Ali ne meni, da se večja varnost na letališčih lahko doseže brez ukrepov, ki tako globoko posegajo v človekovo zasebnost, predvsem z uporabo drugih tehnik, ki ščitijo potnikovo identiteto in zagotavljajo, da ga ni mogoče prepoznati prek slik njegovega telesa?
Does it not think that the objective of higher security at airports could be reached without such intrusive measures, notably by using other techniques that protect passengers’ identities and ensure that they cannot be identified from images of their body?
Ali Komisija ne meni, da bi bilo treba zavezujoče ukrepe, ki imajo tako velike posledice za človekove temeljne pravice, sprejeti z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom, ki predvideva ustreznejšo vključitev Evropskega parlamenta in zagotavlja, da so sklepi objavljeni in pregledni, zlasti za državljane EU, kot zahteva odstavek 56 njegovega poročila P7_TA(2011)0329 , sprejetega v juliju 2011?
Does the Commission not think that binding measures that have such an impact on people’s fundamental rights should always be adopted through the ordinary legislative procedure, which allows the EP to be involved in a more appropriate way and ensures the requisite transparency and publicity of decisions, notably for EU citizens, as requested by Parliament in paragraph 56 of resolution P7_TA(2011)0329 adopted in July 2011?
Kako bo zagotovljeno varstvo osebni podatkov, ki se obdelajo na letališčih z uporabo telesnih skenerjev?
How will the security of the personal data handled at airports by body scanners be guaranteed?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000202/2011
Question for oral answer O-000202/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Evropska podpora beguncem v Tuniziji
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: EU support to refugees in Tunisia
Od 20. februarja je mejo med Libijo in Tunizijo prečkalo več kot 582.000 ljudi.
Since 20 February, over 582 000 people have crossed the border from Libya to Tunisia.
Velika večina je delavcev migrantov v tranzitu, ki se jim je zaradi prizadevanj mednarodne skupnosti v veliki meri uspelo vrniti domov.
The vast majority of those arriving in Tunisia have been migrant workers in transit and, thanks to a concerted international effort, most migrants have been able to reach home.
Ogromno število ljudi, ki prihajajo iz držav v konfliktih ali ki bežijo pred preganjanjem, pa ostaja v begunskih taboriščih.
However, a substantial number of people from conflict-stricken countries and/or fleeing persecution remain in the refugee camps.
Urad visokega komisarja OZN za begunce je 1. avgusta 2011 poročal, da je v puščavskih taboriščih na meji med Tunizijo in Libijo še vedno 4425 oseb, ki živijo v izredno hudih razmerah, predvsem zaradi skrajne vročine, puščavskih viharjev in omejenega dostopa do čiste vode, neustreznih sanitarnih razmer in higiene.
On 1 August 2011, the UNHCR reported that 4 425 persons of concern to them were still present in the desert camps on the Tunisian-Libyan border, where they face extremely harsh conditions, especially due to the extreme heat, sandstorms and limited access to clean water, adequate sanitation and hygiene facilities.
Edina trajna rešitev zanje bi bila preselitev v tretje države.
For these refugees, the only lasting solution is resettlement in third countries.
Odziv držav članic EU glede preselitve je zelo pomanjkljiv, saj so se do sedaj glede tega zavezale le naslednje države: Irska (24), Španija (50), Portugalska (19), Švedska (200), Belgija (25), Finska (70) in Nizozemska (20).
Nevertheless, the response given by EU Member States in terms of resettlement is extremely weak, with only the following pledges for resettlement made so far by the Member States: Ireland (24), Spain (50), Portugal (19), Sweden (200), Belgium (25), Finland (70) and the Netherlands (20).
Povsem nasprotno je ravnala Norveška, ki se je že julija zavezala, da bo naselila 310 beguncev.
Norway, in stark contrast, pledged as long ago as July that it would resettle 310 refugees.
Kako Komisija v sodelovanju s Svetom in državami članicami pomaga UNHCR pri preselitvi preostalih beguncev v Tuniziji?
What is the Commission doing, in cooperation with the Council and the Member States, to assist the UNHCR in the resettlement of the remaining refugees in Tunisia?
Ali lahko Komisija posreduje Parlamentu informacije o naslednjem:
Can the Commission inform Parliament with regard to:
- za koliko novih oseb se bodo zavezale države članice?
- how many new places will be pledged by the Member States?
- kako je s sprejemanjem tistih beguncev, katerih primeri so bili že sprejeti?
- what stage has been reached in the reception of those refugees whose cases have already been accepted?
S katerimi konkretnimi ukrepi si Komisija prizadeva preseči zastoj v Svetu glede skupnega evropskega programa za preselitev, o katerem je Parlament že sklenil prvo obravnavo?
What concrete steps is the Commission taking to overcome the deadlock in the Council concerning the Common European Resettlement Programme, on which Parliament has concluded its first reading?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000203/2011
Question for oral answer O-000203/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Varnostni skenerji
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Security scanners
Komisija je predlagala, naj tudi telesni skenerji postanejo dovoljen način pregledovanja potnikov na letališčih v EU, ter izvedbene ukrepe, ki državam članicam dovoljujejo uporabo skenerjev, ki slikajo človekovo telo, slika pa gre v pregled nadzorni osebi, vendar ni posebej poudarjeno, da morajo biti slike zamegljene ali v obliki orisa, kot je zahteval Parlament v odstavku 27 svoje resolucije P7_TA(2011)0329 , sprejete v juliju 2011.
The Commission has proposed to insert body scanners among the allowed methods for screening of passengers in EU airports, together with implementing measures that allow Member States to use scanners producing images of a person’s body that are to be analysed by a human reviewer, without specifying that these images shall be blurred or be in the form of stick figures, as requested by the EP in Paragraph 27 of its report P7_TA(2011)0329 adopted in July 2011.
Ali ne meni, da se večja varnost na letališčih lahko doseže brez ukrepov, ki tako globoko posegajo v človekovo zasebnost, predvsem z uporabo drugih tehnik, ki ščitijo potnikovo identiteto in dostojanstvo ter zagotavljajo, da ga ni mogoče prepoznati prek slik njegovega telesa?
Does it not think that the objective of higher security at airports could be reached without such intrusive measures, notably by using other techniques that protect passengers’ identities and dignity and ensure that they cannot be identified by images of their body?
Ali Komisija ne meni, da bi bilo treba zavezujoče ukrepe, ki imajo tako velike posledice za temeljne pravice državljanov, vedno sprejeti z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom, ki predvideva ustreznejšo vključitev Evropskega parlamenta in zagotavlja, da so sklepi objavljeni in pregledni, zlasti za državljane EU, kot zahteva Parlament v odstavku 56 resolucije P7_TA(2011)0329 , sprejete v juliju 2011?
Does the Commission not think that binding measures that have such an impact on citizens’ fundamental rights should always be adopted through the ordinary legislative procedure, which allows the EP to be involved in a more appropriate way and ensures the necessary transparency and publicity of decisions, notably for EU citizens, as requested in Paragraph 56 of the EP's report P7_TA(2011)0329 adopted in July 2011?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000204/2011
Question for oral answer O-000204/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Evropska podpora beguncem v Tuniziji
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: EU support to refugees in Tunisia
EU je 14. januarja 2011 oznanila svojo zavezanost podpiranju demokratičnega procesa v Tuniziji in najavila, da bo priskrbela humanitarno pomoč za sprejem stotisočev beguncev, ki so prišli v to državo po vstaji in spopadih v Libiji.
On 14 January 2011, the EU announced its commitment to support the democratic process in Tunisia and to deliver humanitarian aid for the reception of hundreds of thousands of refugees who have arrived in the country following the uprising and the fighting in Libya.
Od 20. februarja letos je mejo med državama prečkalo več kot 582.000 ljudi.
Since 20 February 2011, over 582 000 people have crossed the border from Libya to Tunisia.
Velika večina je delavcev migrantov v tranzitu, ki se jim je zaradi mednarodnih prizadevanj, ki jih je vodila Mednarodna organizacija za migracije, v veliki meri uspelo vrniti domov.
The vast majority of those arriving in Tunisia have been migrant workers in transit and, thanks to a concerted international effort spearheaded by the IOM, most migrants have been able to return home.
Ogromno število ljudi, ki prihaja iz držav v konfliktih ali ki bežijo pred preganjanjem, pa ostaja v begunskih taboriščih.
However, a substantial number of people from conflict-stricken countries and/or fleeing persecution remain in the refugee camps.