natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali namerava preveriti, kako so bila porabljena evropska sredstva, dodeljena deželi Kampaniji v okviru okoljske politike, tudi v povezavi z infiltracijo "camorre", ki je bila naznanjena?
whether it does not plan to check how the European funds allocated to the Campania region in connection with environmental policy have been used, including as regards the reported infiltration by the Camorra;
Ali namerava vpeljati moratorij na dodeljevanje sredstev Skupnosti za deželo Kampanijo, dokler ne bo zagotovljena ponovna vzpostavitev zakonitega stanja?
whether it will not impose a moratorium on Community funding for the Campania region until such time as legal normality is restored?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0002/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0002/08
V resoluciji je bilo tudi predlagano, naj se razmisli o priznanju Romov kot evropske transnacionalne manjšine.
The resolution also suggested considering recognising the Roma as a transnational European minority.
Novembra 2007 je Evropski parlament sprejel resolucijo o pravici do prostega gibanja ( P6_TA(2007)0534 ), v kateri je pozval Komisijo, naj nemudoma ukrepa in oblikuje globalno strategijo za vključevanje Romov v družbo, zlasti s črpanjem sredstev iz sklada za vključevanje in strukturnih skladov, da bi s tem pomagala nacionalnim, regionalnim in lokalnim oblastem pri njihovem prizadevanju za zagotovitev vključevanja Romov v družbo;
In November 2007, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on freedom of movement ( P6_TA(2007)0534 ) calling on the Commission to act without delay by pursuing an overall strategy for the social inclusion of Roma and, not least, to make use of the Integration Fund and Structural Funds to support national, regional and local authorities in their efforts to bring about the social inclusion of Roma.
Čeprav je bilo v zvezi z vprašanji Romov sprejetih že mnogo pobud, Evropska komisija doslej še ni predstavila celostnega akcijskega načrta.
A series of initiatives has been taken that touch on Roma issues, but the European Commission has so far not come forward with a comprehensive action plan.
Ali namerava v prihodnjem letu ob upoštevanju omenjene zahteve Evropskega parlamenta pripraviti osnutek sporočila o vprašanjih Romov?
Does the European Commission intend to draft a communication on Roma issues in the coming year, having in mind the above mentioned request of the European Parliament?
Ali namerava predložiti osnutek horizontalne direktive za boj proti vsem oblikam diskriminacije iz člena 13 Pogodbe o ES?
Does the Commission intend to submit a draft horizontal directive to combat all the forms of discrimination referred to in Article 13 of the EC Treaty?
Kolikšna evropska sredstva imajo na voljo države članice, ki si prizadevajo za vključevanje romskih skupnosti?
What is the amount of European funds available for Member States aiming at the integration of Roma communities?
Ali Evropska komisija upošteva možnost prilagoditve svojih institucionalnih struktur, da bi te lahko bolj učinkovito reševale vprašanja v zvezi z Romi?
Is the European Commission considering the possibility of adapting its institutional structures in order to deal in a more effective way with Roma issues?
Če ne, kako namerava zagotoviti učinkovito usklajevanje prizadevanj v podporo socialnemu in ekonomskemu vključevanju romskih skupnosti z drugimi političnimi pobudami?
If not, how will the European Commission ensure effective coordination of its efforts to support the social and economic integration of Roma communities with other policy initiatives?
Je Evropska komisija pripravljena izvajati spodbujevalne ukrepe za družbeno integracijo Romov, kot priporoča Direktiva 2000/43/ES ?
Is the European Commission ready to enforce incentive measures for the social integration of Roma people, as recommended by EU Directive 2000/43/EC ?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0003/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0003/08
Zadeva: Za akcijski načrt Evropske skupnosti o Romih
Subject: Towards a European Community Action Plan on Roma
Ali namerava Komisija izmeriti krizna območja v Evropski uniji (na mnogih živijo predvsem Romi) in izdelati podroben akcijski načrt, akcijski načrt Skupnosti o Romih, v okviru katerega bi bili sprejeti učinkoviti in takojšnji ukrepi za odpravo revščine in socialne izključenosti?
Is the Commission planning to measure the crisis areas within the European Union, many of which are mainly inhabited by Roma, and planning to come up with a detailed action plan, a Community Action Plan on Roma to take effective and immediate measures to abolish poverty and social exclusion?
Glede na to, da so države članice v zadnjih dvajsetih letih na tem področju storile zelo malo, evropski trg dela in evropska družba nasploh pa bi imela velike koristi od vključitve Romov, ali namerava Komisija na podlagi tega zemljevida kriznih območij prevzeti vlogo pobudnika, financerja, nadzornika in izvajalca?
Considering that Member States in the past two decades have achieved very little, yet the European labour market as well as the whole of European society would greatly benefit from the inclusion of the Roma, is the Commission envisaging taking the initiating, financing, monitoring and implementing role on the basis of this map of the crisis areas?
Ker je integrirani pristop edini sprejemljivi način za zagotavljanje vključevanja različnih skupin, ne pa ločenih ali samostojnih organov, ali nameravajo komisarji, ki so posredno ali neposredno odgovorni za desegregacijo in integracijo romskih skupnosti, uskladiti svoje dejavnosti in leta 2008 sodelovati pri izdelavi akcijskega načrta Skupnosti?
Since an integrated approach is the only acceptable way of dealing with the inclusion of different groups instead of segregated or detached bodies, are those Commissioners who are directly or indirectly responsible for the desegregation and integration of Roma communities planning to coordinate their activities and cooperate in forming the Community Action Plan in 2008?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0004/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0004/08
Direktiva Sveta 2000/43/ES o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost določa minimalne zahteve za zaščito vseh oseb pred diskriminacijo v vseh državah članicah.
Council Directive 2000/43/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin lays down minimum requirements to protect all persons against discrimination in all the Member States.
Države članice določijo pravila o sankcijah za kršitve nacionalnih določb, sprejetih v skladu s to direktivo, in o tem obvestijo Komisijo.
Member States shall lay down the rules on sanctions applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and notify them to the Commission.
Ali je Komisija pripravljena preveriti, ali so bili sprejeti nacionalni ukrepi za izvajanje direktive, kar zadeva pogoje za dostop do zaposlitve, poklicnega usposabljanja, socialnega varstva in predvsem izobraževanja?
Is the Commission ready to verify if national measures have been taken to implement the Directive as far as conditions for access to employment, vocational training, social protection and above all education are concerned?
Ali je Komisija v primeru neizpolnjevanja določb direktive pripravljena ukrepati?
Is the Commission ready to take action in cases of non-compliance with the provisions of the Directive?
Ali se Komisija zaveda, da romski otroci pogosto ne dobijo cepiva ali zdravstvene nege, ki jo potrebujejo, ter da je zanje značilna visoka stopnja odsotnosti od pouka (najmanj 50 % jih ne obiskuje šole)?
Is the Commission aware that Roma children are in many cases not given the vaccinations and medical care they require and there is a high rate of school absenteeism among such children (at least 50 % do not attend school)?
Ali se Komisija poleg tega zaveda, da se številne romske otroke izkorišča za beračenje in da vsako leto veliko takih otrok umre v nesrečah na domu, zlasti požarih, ki nastanejo zaradi slabih varnostnih standardov v taborih?
Furthermore, is the Commission also aware that many Roma children are exploited for begging purposes and every year a large number of such children die in domestic accidents, particularly fires, caused by a lack of proper safety standards in camps?
Ali Komisija meni, da je izobrazba bistveno sredstvo za boj proti socialni izključenosti, izkoriščanju in kriminalu?
Is the Commission of the opinion that education is a fundamental tool to combat social exclusion, exploitation and criminality?
Ali je pripravljena začeti celovit akcijski načrt za Rome v letu 2008, v katerega bi vključila posebne ukrepe za romske otroke, namenjene odpravi revščine, socialni vključenosti ter izobraževanju?
Is it willing to launch a comprehensive action plan on Roma in 2008, including specific actions regarding Roma children, aimed at abolishing poverty, and for social inclusion and education?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0005/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0005/08
Zadeva: Letna razprava za leto 2007 o napredku na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice (člena 2 in 39 pogodbe o EU)
Subject: 2007 annual debate on the progress made in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (FSJA) (Articles 2 and 39 of the EU Treaty)
Ob upoštevanju:
Having regard to:
številnih pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju haaškega programa, težav Sveta, da bi dosegel sporazum o predlogih za okrepitev postopkovnih jamstev, pomanjkljive preglednosti Sveta o dejanskem vplivu ukrepov Evropske unije za razvoj območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, predvidenega začetka veljavnosti nove pogodbe 1. januarja 2009, s katero bo Listina o temeljnih človekovih pravicah postala zavezujoča in s katero se bosta prvi in tretji steber združila, ter ob upoštevanju potrebe po preprečitvi sprejetja novih ukrepov tretjega stebra pred začetkom veljavnosti nove pogodbe, ker še naprej ne bodo imeli neposrednega učinka in se nad njimi pet let ne bo izvajal sodni nadzor,
the numerous shortcomings still affecting the implementation of the Hague programme, the Council difficulties in agreeing on proposals to strengthen the procedural guarantees and the Institution's lack of transparency on the real impact of the EU measures in the development of the FSJA, the planned entry into force on 1 January 2009 of the new Treaty which will make binding the Charter of Fundamental Rights and will merge the first and third pillars, and to the need to avoid the adoption of new third pillar measures before the entry into force of the new Treaty, as they will continue not to have direct effect nor be subject to judicial control for five years,
sprašuje/poziva Svet
I ask the Council the following questions:
ali se je glede predlogov, ki so trenutno v tretjem stebru, pripravljen dogovoriti z Evropskim parlamentom o oblikovanju kratkega seznama prednostnih nalog, tako da bi bil lahko politični dogovor dosežen pred zasedanjem Evropskega sveta v letu 2008 ter formalno sprejet s postopkom soodločanja med januarjem in majem 2009;
For the proposals currently in the third pillar, is it willing to agree with the EP on a short list of priorities, so that a political agreement could be reached before the 2008 European Council and the formal adoption in codecision between January and May 2009?
naj obvesti Evropski parlament o tem, kakšen vpliv bo imela neudeležba Združenega kraljestva v območju svobode, varnosti in pravice;
Will it inform the EP on the impact of the UK's opt-out on freedom, security and justice?
naj Evropskemu parlamentu predloži pregled soodvisnosti različnih pobud in zakonodajnih predlogov na področju boja proti terorizmu in sodelovanja policije na evropski ravni ter dovoli dostop do podatkovnih zbirk in izmenjavo informacij v boju proti kriminalu;
Will it submit to the EP an overview of the interdependence of the various initiatives and legislative proposals in the fields of counter-terrorism and police cooperation at European level and allow access to data bases and exchange of information in the fight against crime?
naj Evropskemu parlamentu predloži zanesljiv program operativnih ukrepov v boju proti terorizmu in za okrepitev sodelovanja policije;
Will it submit to the EP a credible programme of operational measures in the fight against terrorism, and in strengthening police cooperation?
ali se je leta 2008 in na začetku leta 2009 na področju prvega stebra pripravljen dogovoriti z Evropskim parlamentom o ukrepih glede politike zakonitega preseljevanja;
For the first pillar domain, is it willing in 2008 and the beginning of 2009 to agree with the EP on measures linked to legal migration policy?
naj doseže znaten napredek glede predloga direktive o vračanju (KOM(2005)0391 - COD/2005/0167) ter okrepi dialog med državami izvora, tranzita in državami članicami EU;
Will it make substantial progress on the proposal for a return directive (COM(2005)0391 - COD/2005/0167) and to strengthen the dialogue between the countries of origin and transit and the EU Member States?
naj spodbudi države članice, da bodo dale logistično in človeško podporo agenciji Frontex za izvajanje njenih operacij in njeno "zbirko orodij".
Will it push Member States to provide logistical and human support for Frontex's operations and its so-called toolbox?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0006/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0006/08
Zadeva: Letna razprava 2007 o doseženem napredku glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice (člena 2 in 39 Pogodbe o EU)
Subject: 2007 annual debate on the progress made in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (FSJA) (Articles 2 and 39 of the EU Treaty)
izkušenj iz zadnjih let v zvezi z izvajanjem evropskega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, sporočila Komisije (KOM(2007/0373) o številnih pomanjkljivostih, ki še vedno vplivajo na izvajanje haaškega programa, predvidenega začetka veljavnosti nove pogodbe 1. januarja 2009, s katero bo odpravljeno umetno ločevanje politike na področju evropskega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice med pravnim okvirom Skupnosti in medvladnim pravnim okvirom ter okrepljeno delovanje institucij, saj bo listina temeljnih pravic, ki je pravna podlaga tega področja politike, postala obvezujoča,
the recent years' experiences of the implementation of a European Freedom, Security and Justice Area, the Commission Communication (COM(2007)0373) on the numerous shortcomings still affecting the implementation of the Hague programme, the new Treaty which should enter into force on 1 January 2009, which will put an end to the artificial separation of the FSJA policies currently split between a Community and an Intergovernmental legal framework and will strengthen the Institutions' action by making binding the Charter of Fundamental Rights which underpins all these policies,
meni, da morajo biti institucije v naslednjih 18 mesecih pred iztekom tekočega zakonodajnega obdobja učinkovitejše,
I am convinced that the Institutions should make better use of the next 18 months before the end of the current legislature,
poziva Komisijo, če se s tem strinja:
and ask the Commission if it will agree:
naj skupaj z Evropskim parlamentom in prihodnjimi predsedstvi Sveta pripravi poseben medinstitucionalni zakonodajni program za območje svobode, varnosti in pravice za leti 2008 in 2009, v katerem naj bo določeno:
to prepare together with the European Parliament and the next Council Presidencies a specific interinstitutional legislative programme for the FSJA area covering 2008 and 2009 by indicating
katere ukrepe bi lahko dokončno izvedli pred začetkom veljavnosti nove pogodbe in o katerih bi se lahko politično pogajali v letu 2008 in jih uradno sprejeli v času med januarjem in majem 2009;
which measures could be finalised before the entry into force of the new Treaty, and which ones could be politically negotiated in 2008 but formally adopted in the period between January and May 2009;
naj kot glavno načelo sprejme, da bodo ukrepi, ki zadevajo temeljne pravice evropskih državljanov, pod popolnim evropskim in državnim sodnim nadzorom;
to accept as a main rule that the measures that affect the fundamental rights of European citizens should enjoy full judicial control at national and European level;
naj kot posledico omenjenega načela leta 2008 opravi revizijo veljavnih besedil, kot je Uredba (EC) št. 2580/2001 o „črnih seznamih“ ali konvencija o vzajemni pravni pomoči , ali tistih, ki še niso sprejeta, vendar ne prinašajo dejanske dodane vrednosti za zaščito pravic državljanov EU (kot je predlog o postopkovnih jamstvih KOM(2004)0328 – CNS 2004/0113);
as a corollary of the previous principle, to undertake in 2008 revision of the texts already in force (such as Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on the 'Black Lists' or the Mutual Legal Assistance Convention ) or still under discussion but which are not bringing a real added value to the protection of EU citizens' rights (such as the proposal on procedural guarantees COM(2004)0328 - CNS 2004/0113).
naj Parlament obvesti o predvidljivem učinku, ki ga ima možnost izstopa za Združeno kraljestvo na svobodo, varnost in pravico;
to inform the EP on the foreseeable impact of the UK's opt-out on freedom, security and justice;
naj Parlament v celoti obvešča o izidu posvetovanj z državami članicami o posledicah antiterorističnih ukrepov.
to fully inform the EP on the result of the Member States' consultation on the impact of the EU anti-terrorist measures.
UL L 344, 28.12.2001, str.
OJ L 344 of 28.12.2001, p.
UL L 181, 19.7.2003, str.
OJ L 181 of 19.7.2003, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0007/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0007/08
Zadeva: Sredozemska prehrana, nesnovna dediščina človeštva
Subject: The Mediterranean diet, a non-material part of the human heritage
Komisija je takrat izjavila, da namerava poskrbeti za vsa potrebna sredstva in vire, da bo predlog v Unescu sprejet.
The Commission said it would make available all the means and resources required to ensure acceptance of the proposal.
Bi lahko Komisija navedla dejavnosti, ki jih je izvedla za sprejem tega predloga?
Can the Commission state what actions have been carried out in support of this proposal?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena oblikovati skupno in usklajeno strategijo v podporo predlogu?
Will the Commission draw up a common, coordinated strategy to support the proposal?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0008/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0008/08
Zadeva: Sistem raketne obrambe ZDA
Subject: US missile defence system
Vlade Poljske, Republike Češke in Združenega kraljestva se pogajajo z Združenimi državami Amerike o namestitvi sestavnih delov protibalističnega raketnega ščita ZDA.
The Governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom are in negotiations with the United States over deployment of elements for a US anti-ballistic missile shield.
Te so kot glavni razlog pri utemeljitvi teh načrtov navedle varnostno grožnjo, ki jo predstavlja Iran.
Security threats from Iran have been advanced by the US as the main reason to justify the plans.
Kot navajajo ZDA, je obrambni sistem namenjen varovanju Evrope in Združenih držav pred raketnimi napadi, odločitev za njegovo namestitev pa ima pomembne posledice za vse države članice Evropske unije in njene sosede.
According to the US, the defence system is intended to protect Europe as well as the United States against missile attacks, and the decision for its deployment bears important consequences for all members of the European Union and its neighbours.
Nedavna ocena obveščevalnih agencij Združenih držav (National Intelligence Estimate) o jedrskih namerah in zmogljivostih Irana je privedla do sklepa, da je Iran ustavil svoj program jedrskega oboroževanja leta 2003 in da ga do sredine leta 2007 ni ponovno začel.
The recent assessment by the United States intelligence agencies - the National Intelligence Estimate - on Iran's nuclear intentions and capacities comes to the conclusion that Iran stopped its nuclear weapons programme in 2003 and that it has not restarted it as of mid-2007.
Agencije nadalje navajajo, da je „iz odločitve Teherana, da zaustavi svoj program jedrskega oboroževanja, mogoče sklepati, da je manj odločen razvijati jedrsko orožje, kot smo sklepali od leta 2005“.
The agencies further state that 'Tehran's decision to halt its nuclear weapons program suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005.'
Poglavitna utemeljitev v korist raketnega ščita je tako postala negotova.
In consequence, the main argument in favour of the missile shield has faltered.
Nova poljska vlada je ta teden razglasila, da je treba pred sprejetjem odločitve v celoti razpravljati o koristih in tveganjih tega sistema.
The new Polish Government announced this week that the benefits and risks of the system have to be discussed fully before a decision is made.
Ali je na srečanjih Sveta potekala razprava o novih varnostnih ocenah ZDA in njihovih posledicah za raketni obrambni sistem?
Have the new US security estimates and their consequences for the missile defence system been discussed in Council meetings?
Ali je bil Svet zaprošen za mnenje in obveščen o tekočih dvostranskih pogajanjih med ZDA in zadevnimi vladami?
Is the Council being consulted and kept informed about the ongoing bilateral negotiations between the US and the concerned governments?
Ali je načrtovan protiraketni sistem skladen s cilji evropske varnostne strategije in ali Svet meni, da je to pravi odgovor za odvračanje mednarodnega terorizma?
Is the planned anti-missile system compatible with the goals of the European Security Strategy and does the Council believe it to be the right answer to counter international terrorism?
Ali Svet meni, da načrti raketne obrambe lahko pomembno vplivajo na odnose med EU in njenimi sosedami, zlasti Rusijo?
Does the Council see a relevance of the missile defence plans for EU relations with its neighbours, notably Russia?
Ali se Svet pridružuje zaskrbljenosti številnih opazovalcev, da bo načrtovana raketna obramba prispevala k obnovitvi tehnološke oboroževalne tekme (primer je nedavna odločitev Rusije, da ob belorusko mejo s Poljsko namesti rakete kratkega dosega)?
Does the Council share the concern of many observers that the planned missile defence will contribute to a renewed technological arms race (for example, Russia's recent decision to deploy short-range missiles at the Belarus border with Poland)?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0009/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0009/08
Zadeva: Varnostna oznaka na potrošniških izdelkih
Subject: Safety marking on consumer products
V okviru blagovnega svežnja so se pojavila vprašanja o področju delovanja obstoječe oznake CE in o morebitnih vlogah, ki jih lahko imajo oznake pri večjem obveščanju potrošnikov o varnosti izdelka.
In the framework of the Goods package, questions were raised with regard to the scope of the existing CE-marking and the possible role markings can play in enhancing consumer information on product safety.
Ker so se poslanci strinjali, da vloge morebitnih potrošniških oznak ne sme prevzeti obstoječa oznaka CE, se strinjajo tudi, da potrebujejo več informacij o izvedljivosti in morebitnem vplivu dodatnih oznak.
Whereas members agreed that the role of a possible consumer marking cannot be assumed by the existing CE-marking, they do agree that there is a need for more information about the feasibility and the possible impact of an additional marking.
Zato Parlament poziva Komisijo, naj:
The Parliament therefore requests the Commission:
preuči koncept dodatne oznake, ki je namenjena večjemu obveščanju potrošnika o varnosti izdelka;
to examine the concept of a supplementary marking aiming at enhancing consumer information on product safety;
izvede poglobljeno študijo, ki bo pojasnila izvedljivost, morebitne koristi in slabosti take oznake za vse zainteresirane strani;
to carry out an in-depth study in order to clarify the feasibility, the possible benefits and the potential drawbacks of such a marking for all the stakeholders;
preuči možnosti za okrepitev verodostojnosti oznake CE, zlasti z ukrepi za večji carinski nadzor znotraj in izven EU.
to examine the possibilities for reinforcing the credibility of the CE-marking, in particular through measures for stronger customs controls inside and outside the EU.