natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To postavlja pod velik vprašaj delovanje deponije v Mavrorachiju v Solunu, kjer se izvajajo biološka obdelava odpadkov, programi recikliranja in urejanje ekološkega parka na starih deponijah.
This is causing a major problem regarding the operation of the Thessaloniki landfill sight in Mavrorachi, biological waste processing, recycling programmes and the operation of the environmental park on former landfill sites.
Javne oblasti so napovedale podpis dvomesečnih pogodb o izvajanju omenjenih storitev, s čimer so ti delavci še naprej v politično in zaposlitveno nevzdržnem položaju, da bi tako pospešile postopek privatizacije obdelave odpadkov in odpuščanje na tisoče delavcev.
The local authorities have announced the signing of two-months contracts for the operation of the above services, thereby continuing to implement their policy of holding workers to ransom, so as to speed up the process of waste management privatisation, resulting in the dismissal of thousands of workers.
Kakšno je stališče Komisije o nameri Zveze lokalnih skupnosti v Solunu o privatizaciji dejavnosti obdelovanja odpadkov, ki je bistvenega pomena za javno zdravje, posledica česar bo poleg tveganj za prebivalstvo in okolje tudi odpuščanje na tisoče delavcev, ki jih bodo nadomestili pogodbeni delavci s fleksibilnimi pogodbami in brez pravic?
What view does the Commission take of plans by the local authorities to privatise waste management, which is of crucial importance in terms of public health, given that, in addition to endangering the health of local residents and the environment, such a measure will result in thousands of job losses and their replacement by posts filled through temporary and flexible contracts containing no rights for the workers?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0559/2010
Question for Question Time H-0559/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Prihodnost športnega programa EU
(ALDE) Subject: The future of the EU Sports Programme
Glede na zasedanje Sveta za izobraževanje, mladino, kulturo in šport prejšnji teden, kako se bo športni program EU razvijal v naslednjih dveh letih brez proračuna?
Following the meeting of the Education, Youth, Culture and Sport Council last week, how will the EU Sports Programme evolve over the next 2 years in the absence of a budget?
Ali Svet pričakuje, da bodo sredstva za športni program EU na voljo po letu 2013?
Does the Council expect funding to be made available to the EU Sports Programme after 2013?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0560/2010
Question for Question Time H-0560/2010
Glede na to, da EU ne bo financirala športnega programa EU leta 2011 in 2012 zaradi omejitev proračuna ter glede na to, da spada šport sedaj v pristojnost EU, kako lahko športno politiko oblikujemo in podpiramo?
Given that the EU will not be funding the EU Sports Programme in 2011 and 2012 because of budget constraints and given that sport now falls under the EU’s competence, how can an EU sports policy be established and supported?
Kako lahko v naslednjih dveh letih EU vpliva na področja množičnega športa in vseživljenjskega športa za vse in je na njih učinkovita?
Over the next two years, how can the EU influence and be effective in the areas of grassroots sport and lifelong amateur sport for all?
Ali Komisija pričakuje, da bo športni program EU financiran po letu 2013?
Does the Commission expect there to be a funded EU Sports Programme after 2013?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0561/2010
Question for Question Time H-0561/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Poučevanje eksaktnih ved v tujem jeziku v latvijskih šolah
(S&D) Subject: Teaching the exact sciences in a foreign language in Latvian schools
Vsakdo od nas ima spomine na šolska leta.
We all remember our years at school.
Nekateri predmeti so nam bili bolj všeč, drugi manj – redkim pa se fizika, matematika in kemija niso zdele težke.
We liked some subjects more and others less – but very few of us had no difficulties with physics, mathematics and chemistry.
Torej celo v maternem jeziku učenje eksaktnih ved ni samoumevno.
This means that, even in one’s mother tongue, learning the exact sciences is not easy.
Skušajmo si predstavljati, da bi v flamskih šolah v Belgiji pouk fizike potekal v francoščini namesto v nizozemščini.
Try imagining a situation where physics and mathematics lessons in Flemish schools in Belgium were taught in French instead of Dutch.
Ali bi bilo to za otroke koristno?
Would such a situation be good for the children?
V Latviji, kjer je 45 % prebivalstva rusko govorečega, se zaradi šolske reforme eksaktne vede na žalost ne poučujejo v maternem jeziku.
Alas, in Latvia, where 45% of the population is Russian-speaking, the exact sciences are not taught in their mother tongue, owing to the school reform.
Ali Komisija meni, da poučevanje eksaktnih ved v tujem jeziku otrokom omogoča dobro razumevanje in obvladovanje teh predmetov?
Does the Commission consider that teaching the exact sciences in a foreign language allows the children to fully understand and master these subjects?
Ali ni po mnenju Komisije nelogična uporaba tujega jezika ovira za popolno obvladovanje poučevanih predmetov?
Does it not agree that the illogical use of a foreign language constitutes an obstacle to the complete mastery of the subjects taught?
Ali ni nevarno, da bo slabo učenje eksaktnih ved negativno vplivalo na konkurenčnost spričeval srednješolskega izobraževanja na trgu dela in na nadaljnji študij?
Does bad acquisition of the exact sciences not risk having effects on the competitiveness of holders of secondary school diplomas on the employment market and on their further studies?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0562/2010
Question for Question Time H-0562/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Financiranje kulturnih programov
(PPE) Subject: Financing of cultural programmes
V Evropski uniji se kultura trenutno financira preko različnih finančnih mehanizmov, ki so namenjen izmenjavam in sodelovanju na kulturnem področju, dialogu med kulturami in okrepitvi tega sektorja.
The financing of culture in the EU is currently achieved through various financial mechanisms dealing with exchanges and cooperation in cultural matters, dialogue between cultures and the strengthening of this sector.
Strategija Evropske unije "Evropa 2020" se osredotoča na gospodarsko rast, ki temelji na družbi znanja, zeleni industriji itn.
The EU’s Europe 2020 strategy focuses on economic growth based on a knowledge society, green industry, etc.
Nekatere skrbi, da ta strategija obravnava kulturo kot sestavni del gospodarske rasti.
There are fears that this strategy regards culture as one part of economic growth.
Kulturna identiteta je ena izmed temeljnih vrednost Evropske unije in zaradi njene narave je nepojmljivo, da se ocenjuje s količinskimi kazalniki.
Cultural identity is one of the fundamental values of the EU and cannot, by its very nature, be measured in terms of quantitative indicators.
Projekti, katerih cilj je kombinacija sedanjih finančnih mehanizmov, povzročajo zaskrbljenost, saj so programi zelo različni, čeprav obravnavajo kulturo.
Projects which aim to combine current financial mechanisms are cause for concern, as the programmes vary greatly, even though they are concerned with culture.
Druga zaskrbljujoča težnja je poskus združevanja kulturnih programov in programa o državljanstvu, saj bi imeli projekti, ki bi iz tega izhajali, majhno umetniško vrednost.
Efforts to merge cultural programmes and the Citizenship Programme are another worrying trend, as the resulting projects have little artistic value.
Ali so projekti Komisije v zvezi z načini financiranja kulturnih programov v novem programskem obdobju že znani?
Have the Commission’s projects regarding methods of financing cultural programmes during the new financial perspective been decided upon?
Ali bo ohranjen program kulture, kakršen obstaja danes?
Will there be a cultural programme such as is currently in existence?
Ali bo odobrena podpora za izmenjave in sodelovanje na področju kulture?
Will there be support for exchanges and cooperation in cultural matters?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0563/2010
Question for Question Time H-0563/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Pregled direktive 2003/96/ES o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije
(S&D) Subject: Revision of Directive 2003/96/EC on taxation in the energy sector
Direktiva 2003/96/ES o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije ne vključuje merila za emisije ogljikovega dioksida.
Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity does not include the criterion of carbon dioxide emissions.
Ker ne razlikuje med proizvodi z visoko, nizko ali nično vsebnostjo ogljikovih emisij, povzroča težave na področju konkurence in je neskladna z glavnimi cilji EU na področju podnebnih sprememb.
This failure to differentiate between products with a high and low or zero carbon emission content creates competition problems and is incompatible with the EU's main objectives on climate change.
Do kakšne mere je za Komisijo pregled te direktive z namenom vključitve merila za ogljikov dioksid prednostna naloga in katere sektorje bi zadeval?
In revising the above directive, to what extent is the introduction of the CO2 emission criterion a priority for the Commission, and in which sectors?
Če upoštevamo, da so nekatere države članice EU na nacionalni ravni že sprejele tovrstno zakonodajo, ali je po mnenju Komisije primerno, da se pregled začne čim hitreje, da bi se preprečil vsak poskus izkrivljanja konkurence na notranjem trgu?
Given that some Member States have already introduced such legislative provisions at national level, does the Commission consider that the directive should be revised without delay in order to obviate any tendency towards distortion of the internal market?
V kolikšni meri bi pregled lahko zagotovil pravičnejšo porazdelitev davčnih obremenitev na sektorje, ki povzročajo hude zunanje učinke ("eksternalije"), kot je onesnaževanje okolja?
To what extent might this revision ensure a fairer division of the tax burden by shifting more on to sectors which create significant externalities, such as environmental pollution?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0564/2010
Question for Question Time H-0564/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Sončni paneli na strehah stavb EU
(PPE) Subject: Solar panels on roofs of EU buildings
Vse več podjetij, tudi javna podjetja, dosega dogovore s podjetji za vgradnjo sončnih panelov za brezplačno uporabo streh njihovih stavb za vgradnjo sončnih panelov v zameno za dobavo brezplačne zelene elektrike.
More and more businesses (including publicly owned businesses) are reaching agreements with solar panel installation firms to make the roofs of their buildings available free of charge for the installation of solar panels, in exchange for the supply of free green electricity.
Ali bo Komisija sledila temu vzoru in dala na razpolago streho svojih stavb?
Will the Commission adopt the same model and make the roofs of its buildings available?
Ali je Komisija že izračunala, kolikšno morebitno območje strehe bi bilo lahko na razpolago in kakšen učinek bi to imelo na njene stroške za elektriko in njen ekološki odtis?
Has the Commission already calculated what potential area of roof space is available and what impact this could have on its energy bills and ecological footprint?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0565/2010
Question for Question Time H-0565/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Oviranje notranjega trga z zdravili in razvrednotenje evropskih standardov kakovosti v državah članicah
(PPE) Subject: Undermining of the internal market in medicines and the European quality and safety standards by Member States
Države članice očitno vse bolj slabijo notranji trg z zdravili, dostop pacientov do zdravil in vlogo Evropske agencije za zdravila (EMA) z uporabo "četrte ovire za dostop na trg", kar pomeni z odločitvami za določanje nacionalnih cen in povračil, za razvrednotenje evropskih standardov kakovosti in varnosti.
Apparently Member States are increasingly undermining the internal market in medicines, patients’ access to medicines and the role of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) by using the so-called ‘fourth hurdle for market access’, i.e. the national pricing and reimbursement decisions, to undermine the European quality and safety standards.
Zdi se, da nekatere države članice poskušajo vzpostaviti dodaten standard za varnost, kakovost in učinkovitost zdravil.
It seems that some Member States are trying to establish a second standard for the safety, quality and efficacy of medicines.
Ti ukrepi bi lahko razvrednotili evropski regulativni okvir za zdravila, ki zahteva dolgotrajen in drag proces za odobritev trženja.
These actions could undermine the EU regulatory framework for medicines, which requires a long and costly process for market authorisation.
Ta dejanja prav tako ogrožajo enotni trg farmacevtskih izdelkov.
These practices also threaten the single market in pharmaceuticals.
Izkrivljanje konkurence med farmacevtskimi podjetji, ki izvajajo lastne klinične raziskave in poskuse za zagotovitev odobritev, in tistimi, ki jih ne upoštevajo, je v nasprotju z načeli enotnega trga.
It is contrary to single market principles to distort competition between those pharmaceutical companies that undertake the proper clinical research and tests to secure authorisations and those that disregard them.
Ali je Komisija seznanjena s tem problemom?
Is the Commission aware of this problem?
Ali Komisija preiskuje te dogodke in svari države članice, naj zaustavijo ta dejanja?
Is the Commission looking into this development and warning Member States not to pursue such practices?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0566/2010/rev.1
Question for Question Time H-0566/2010/rev.1
(S&D) Zadeva: Razprava o menjalnih tečajih v pričakovanju vrha G-20
(S&D) Subject: Exchange rate deliberations with a view to the G20 summit
Vprašanje menjalnih tečajev in devalvacijska tekma, v katero se je spustilo več držav na svetovni ravni, posledica česar je izredno nihanje menjalnih tečajev, sta bistveni točki na dnevnem redu mednarodne politike.
The question of exchange rates and competitive devaluation by a number of countries at international level, resulting in massive currency fluctuations, is a major item on the international political agenda.
Številni analitiki v isti okvir uvrščajo nedavno pobudo ameriške centralne banke (FED), v smislu povečanja količine denarja v obtoku, kot posledico monetarne politike, ki jo že dolgo izvaja Kitajska.
Many place this in the same context as the recent quantitative easing by the US Federal Reserve in the wake of the monetary policy being followed by China for some time now.
Glede na veliko nestabilnost in splošno razširjeno zaskrbljenost, ki ju povzročajo pobude za intervencije na področju menjalnih tečajev, in učinek, ki ga lahko nedvomno imajo na konkurenčnost gospodarstva držav članic euroobmočja, kakšno je stališče Sveta, zlasti v pričakovanju vrha G-20?
Given the highly unstable situation, accompanied by widespread fears of exchange rate intervention and the undeniable impact it could have on the competitiveness of the euro zone countries in economic terms, what is the position of the Council regarding the forthcoming G20 summit in particular?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0567/2010
Question for Question Time H-0567/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Mnenje Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu (EASA) o licencah pilotov
(ALDE) Subject: EASA opinion on pilot licensing
Avgusta 2010 je agencija EASA Komisiji predložila mnenje o novih predpisih za licence pilotov.
In August 2010 EASA submitted an opinion to the Commission on new rules for pilot licensing.
Namen predloga je izboljšati varnost v letalstvu.
The proposal seeks to improve aviation safety.
EASA želi med drugim zagotoviti, da bi imeli vsi piloti, ki pilotirajo v EU, pilotsko licenco, izdano v EU.
EASA wishes among other things to ensure that all pilots flying in the EU have a pilot’s licence issued in the EU.
Glede na to bi na primer osebe, ki imajo licenco iz ZDA, ne mogle biti nujno upravičene pilotirati v EU.
Accordingly, persons holding a licence from the USA, for example, would not necessarily still be entitled to fly in the EU.
Kakšno mnenje ima Komisija o tem predlogu?
What is the Commission’s view of this proposal?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0568/2010
Question for Question Time H-0568/2010
Delno zasedanje: december 2010
Part-session: December 2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Večjezičnost v mejnih regijah
(PPE) Subject: Multilingualism in border regions
Kako Svet ocenjuje uspešnost programov EU za spodbujanje kulture v mejnih regijah, zlasti kar zadeva podporo večjezičnosti ter spodbujanje jezikov sosednjih držav v vrtcih in šolah?
In the Council’s view, how successful have the EU’s programmes to foster culture in border regions been, in particular as regards support for multilingualism and promotion of the teaching of the languages of neighbouring countries in nursery schools and schools?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0569/2010
Question for Question Time H-0569/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Sodelovanje Vojvodine in vzhodne Hrvaške
(PPE) Subject: Cooperation between Vojvodina and eastern Croatia
Kako Komisija ocenjuje možnosti za okrepljeno čezmejno sodelovanje srbske pokrajine Vojvodine in vzhoda Hrvaške (regija Osijek/južna Slavonija), zlasti kar zadeva izgradnjo čezmejne infrastrukture, h kateri sodi tudi projekt izgradnje hitre ceste od Sombora do Osijeka?
How does the Commission view the potential for greater cross-border cooperation between the Serbian province of Vojvodina and eastern Croatia (Osijek/Eastern Slavonia region), with particular regard to the development of cross-border infrastructure such as the project to construct a motorway from Sombor to Osijek?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0570/2010
Question for Question Time H-0570/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Enakost med ženskami in moškimi pri odločanju
(S&D) Subject: Gender equality in decision-making
Glede na dejstvo, da ženske zasedajo samo en sedež od štirih v nacionalnih parlamentih in vladah, da predstavljajo samo 10 % članov upravnih svetov velikih družb, ki kotirajo na borzi v EU, in da te družbe vodi le 3 % žensk, je Komisija v svoji strategiji za enakost med ženskami in moškimi 2010–2015 izjavila, da želi preučiti pobude, spremljati napredek in podpirati spodbujanje sodelovanja.
In view of the fact that that women occupy only one seat in four in national parliaments and governments, that only 10% of the directors of major listed companies in the EU are women and only that 3% of such companies are chaired by women, the Commission states, in its Strategy for equality between women and men 2010-2015, that it will consider ‘initiatives’, ‘monitor progress’ and ‘support efforts’ to promote women’s participation.
Za boj proti temu steklenemu stropu pa takoj potrebujemo usmerjene ukrepe.
However, in order to combat this glass ceiling, targeted action is required now.
Ali Komisija namerava določiti kvote, da bi se tako povečalo sodelovanje žensk pri odločanju?
Does the Commission intend to bring in quotas to ensure a greater role for women in the decision-making process?
Ali namerava aktivneje spodbujati države članice k razvoju sistemov za varstvo otrok, ki bi materam omogočali boljše usklajevanje poklicnega in zasebnega življenja?
Does it intend to encourage more actively the Member States to develop their childcare systems to enable mothers to strike a better balance between work and family life?
Katere druge ukrepe namerava sprejeti na tem področju, zlasti za odpravljanje stereotipov?
What other measures does it intend to take, notably to combat stereotypes?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0571/2010
Question for Question Time H-0571/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Prispevek kulture k bruto domačemu proizvodu
(PPE) Subject: Contribution of culture to Gross Domestic Product
Belgijsko predsedstvo v svojem programu izrecno poudarja pomen, ki ga pripisuje morebitnemu ovrednotenju kulturne industrije in njenemu prispevku k bruto domačemu proizvodu držav članic.
The programme of the Belgian Presidency makes particular reference to the importance which it attaches to the potential of the culture industry and to the contribution it makes to Member States' Gross Domestic Product.
V njem tako navaja, da bo Svet med tem polletnim predsedovanjem posebno pozornost namenil politikam, ki bodo izvajale in podpirale pobude kulturne industrije, zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij.
The programme states, specifically, that during the six months of the Presidency, the Council will devote particular attention to policies which will develop and support initiatives by the culture industry, especially those coming from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Ker je treba zaradi finančne krize ovrednotiti inovativne sektorje rasti, ki so sorazmerno malo izkoriščeni, pozivamo Svet, naj odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Given, moreover, that owing to the economic crisis, there is a need to make optimum use of innovative and relatively unexploited areas of growth, will the Council answer the following questions?
Ali meni, da je bil med belgijskim predsedovanjem dosežen zadovoljiv napredek pri pomoči in podpori kulturni industriji ter malim in srednjim podjetjem, ki delujejo v tem sektorju?
Is it satisfied with the progress made during the Belgian Presidency in supporting and encouraging the culture industry and SMEs operating in that industry?
Ali ima na voljo podrobne podatke o prispevku tega sektorja k bruto domačemu proizvodu držav članic?
Does it have accurate figures showing the percentage which this sector contributes to Member States' GDP?
V katerih državah članicah je ta prispevek visok?
In which Member States does the culture industry make a significant contribution to GDP?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0572/2010
Question for Question Time H-0572/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Stroški tolmačenja, prevajanja in informacij v zvezi s kazenskim postopkov v državah članicah
(PPE) Subject: Costs for Member States arising from interpretation, translation and information rights in criminal proceedings
Uredba o pravici do tolmačenja in prevajanja, ki jo je pred kratkim sprejel Svet, ter o pravici do obveščenosti obdolžencev, ki je trenutno v obravnavi, sta temeljna ukrepa načrta, ki ga je predlagala Komisija za krepitev pravice obdolžencev do obrambe.
The regulation on interpretation and translation rights recently adopted by the Council and on the information rights of defendants which is currently being examined are two basic measures of the Road Map proposed by the Commission to strengthen defendants' rights of defence.
Bi lahko Komisija odgovorila na naslednja vprašanja:
Will the Commission say:
Glede na to, da se pričakuje, da bodo stroške za prevajanje, tolmačenje in obveščanje krile izključno države članice, kakšne finančne posledice lahko pričakujejo in kolikšen znesek bodo morale plačati za zagotavljanje teh storitev?
Given that it is foreseen, inter alia, that Member States shall bear the entire translation, interpretation and information costs, what are the expected financial impact on and financial burden for Member States arising from the provision of such services?
Države članice, kot sta Grčija in Malta, se spopadajo z močnim pritokom nezakonitih priseljencev, zaradi česar bodo nastali dodatni stroški zagotavljanja prevajanja in tolmačenja ali obveščanja v zvezi z obtožbami ter usposabljanja policistov in tožilcev.
Member States, such as Greece and Malta, receive large numbers of illegal migrants and are expected to face particularly heavy costs from the provision of translation, interpretation and information services relating to criminal charges and the training of police officers and prosecutors.
Ali namerava Komisija prispevati k prizadevanjem, tako da bo tem državam zagotovila denarno in drugo pomoč, s čimer bi preprečila, da bi se morale same spopadati s stroški, nastalimi zaradi kazenskih postopkov, ki obravnavajo nezakonite priseljence?
Is the Commission expected to contribute to help these countries and provide them with financial assistance so that they do not have to bear the entire cost of providing these services to illegal migrants involved in legal proceedings?