natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na tem sestanku so predstavniki Evropske komisije povedali, da potekajo na Komisiji dejavnosti v zvezi s standardizacijo električnih vozil.
At this meeting the European Commission announced that it was working on electric vehicle standardisation.
Kdaj bo Komisija predstavila časovni razpored za pripravo ustrezne zakonodaje?
When will the Commission present a timetable for this legislation?
Kakšne konkretne predloge za standardizacijo bo predstavila Komisija?
What concrete proposals on standardisation will the Commission come forward with?
Kako bodo oblikovani in kakšna bo njihova vsebina?
What will they look like and what issues will they cover?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0021/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0021/10
Zadeva: Genetsko spremenjeni organizmi
Subject: Genetically modified organisms
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni svoje namere v zvezi s ponovnim odprtjem razprave o genetsko spremenjenih organizmih?
Could the Commission clarify its intentions concerning the re-opening of the debate over genetically modified organisms?
Ali namerava Komisija ponovno sprožiti postopek za odobritev dveh različic genetsko spremenjenih organizmov, namreč koruze MON 810 in krompirja Amflora, kar je v nasprotju z javnim mnenjem, ki močno nasprotuje gojenju genetsko spremenjenih poljščin v EU?
Does the Commission wish to reactivate the process for the authorisation of two GMO varieties, MON 810 corn and the Amflora potato, contrary to public opinion which is strongly opposed to growing GM crops in the EU?
Ali lahko Komisija poda jasne in natančne informacije o tem, ali namerava oblikovati novi okvir za genetsko spremenjene organizme, in če je to res, na kakšni podlagi?
Could the Commission give some clear and precise information as regards its intention to develop a new framework for GMOs and, if so, on what basis?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0022/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0022/10
Zadeva: Uredba o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov
Subject: Regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences
Glede na to, da je Parlament leta 2008 zahteval, da mu predlog za revidirano uredbo o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferenicalov za obdobje od 1. januarja 2012 do 31. decembra 2014 posreduje do 1. junija 2010, kdaj namerava Komisija predstaviti ta predlog Evropskemu parlamentu?
In view of the request made by the Parliament in 2008 that the proposal for a revised regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences covering the period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2014 be forwarded to Parliament by 1 June 2010, when does the Commission intend to submit this proposal to Parliament?
Kako Komisija preverja in ocenjuje, ali države upravičenke spoštujejo svoje obveze, zlasti glede učinkovitega izvajanja mednarodnih konvencij o človekovih pravicah, delovnih standardih, trajnostnem razvoju in dobrem upravljanju?
How does the Commission check and evaluate that the commitments made by beneficiary countries are being honoured, in particular the effective implementation of international conventions on human rights, labour standards, sustainable development and good governance?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje sedanjo shemo splošnega sistema preferencialov (SSP+) v zvezi s povečanjem obsega izvoza?
How does the Commission evaluate the current GSP+ system in terms of the increase in export volume?
Na kakšni osnovi se Komisija odloči, da bo začela preiskavo (člen 16) in nato predlagala začasen preklic preferencialnih režimov?
On what grounds does the Commission decide to initiate an investigation (Article 16) and subsequently propose a temporary withdrawal of the preferential arrangements?
Sedaj (člen 17) je predvideno, da lahko samo država članica ali Komisija podata mnenje, da obstajajo zadostni razlogi za preiskavo.
At present (Article 17), it is provided that only a Member State or the Commission may consider that there are sufficient grounds for an investigation.
Kako namerava Komisija vključiti stališče Evropskega parlamenta, če ta meni, da obstajajo zadostni razlogi za preiskavo?
How does the Commission intend to take into account Parliament's view when the latter considers that there are sufficient grounds for an investigation?
Kdaj namerava Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu predstaviti zahtevano poročilo o stanju ratifikacije in izvajanja konvencij v državah članicah, ki so upravičenke po posebnem spodbujevalnem režimu?
When does the Commission intend to submit to Parliament the requested report on the ratification and implementation status of the conventions, for each country benefiting from the special incentive arrangement?
Je Komisija pripravila študijo o oceni učinka SSP za obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 do 31. decembra 2009, ki jo je Parlament zahteval leta 2008?
Has the Commission prepared the impact assessment study of the effects of the GSP covering the period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2009 as requested by Parliament in 2008?
Kako si je Komisija znotraj Svetovne trgovinske organizacije prizadevala, da bi dosegla sporazum, ki bi uskladil pravila o poreklu, v skladu s katerimi države v razvoju in najmanj razvite države uživajo preferencialno obravnavo?
How did the Commission 'strive within the World Trade Organization (WTO) to achieve an agreement harmonising the rules of origin, pursuant to which developing countries and the LDCs receive preferential treatment'?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0023/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0023/10
Zadeva: Kmetijstvo in prihodnja strategija EU 2020
Subject: Agriculture and the future 'EU 2020' Strategy
Evropska komisija je pred kratkim začela javno posvetovanje o prihodnji strategiji EU 2020, ki naj bi nadomestila sedanjo lizbonsko strategijo in oblikovala nov pristop k reševanju gospodarske krize.
The European Commission has recently launched a public consultation on the future 'EU 2020' Strategy with a view to designing the successor to the current Lisbon Strategy and to deciding on a new approach to overcome the economic crisis.
Kljub temu da sta kmetijstvo in živilska veriga za evropsko gospodarstvo izjemno pomembna ter kljub njunemu prispevku k zaposlovanju, v dokumentu Komisije (KOM(2009)0647 z dne 24.11.2009) sektor ni niti enkrat omenjen.
Despite the significance of agriculture and the food supply chain in the European economy and their contribution to employment, the Commission document (COM(2009)0647 of 24 November 2009) does not cite this sector once.
Ali namerava Komisija skupni kmetijski politiki dodeliti vlogo v evropski strategiji za izhod iz krize?
Does the Commission intend to include the role of the CAP in its European strategy for getting out of the crisis?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0024/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0024/10
Zadeva: Varnost v letalstvu: uporaba Uredbe o "črni listi" EU (ES št. 2111/2005)
Subject: Aviation safety: application of EU blacklist Regulation (EC N° 2111/2005)
Ob upoštevanju naslednjega: uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005 o vzpostavitvi seznama Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti (uredba o „črni listi“), napovedi Komisije o internih ukrepih za zagotovitev, da bi bila ta uredba izvedena učinkoviteje, in potrebe po boljšem mednarodnem sodelovanju s tretjimi državami in ICAO, vključno s svetovnim seznamom o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov (KOM(2009)0710), bi rad zastavil naslednja vprašanja.
With reference to the following: the application of Regulation (EC) N° 2111/2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community (blacklist regulation); the Commission's announcements on internal measures to render the implementation of this regulation more effective, and the need for more international cooperation with third countries and ICAO, including a worldwide list of banned carriers (COM(2009)0710), I should like to ask the following questions.
Katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija za zagotovitev, da bodo državljani EU, ki letijo v tretje države, obveščeni o tistih letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov in so na „črni listi“, glede na to, da te letalske družbe še naprej opravljajo notranje lete in lete drugje po svetu?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to ensure that EU citizens flying in third countries are given information regarding those air carriers that are banned and appear on the blacklist, given that these airlines continue to fly domestically and to other regions of the world?
Katere informacije so na voljo potnikom glede letalskih družb, katerih licenca je bila razveljavljena?
What information is made available to passengers concerning airlines whose licence has been revoked?
Katere instrumente namerava uporabiti v tretjih državah za spremljanje skladnosti z varnostnimi standardi ICAO, vključno z ustanovitvijo neodvisnih in učinkovitih regulativnih organov?
What instruments does it intend to use in third countries to monitor compliance with ICAO safety standards, including the establishment of independent and effective regulatory authorities?
Bo Komisija preučila, ali je treba vpeljati usklajene in standardizirane postopke preverjanja na ploščadi ter vzpostaviti učinkovit sistem za mednarodno izmenjavo zanesljivih podatkov?
Will it examine the need to introduce harmonised and standardised ramp inspection procedures as well as the need for an effective system of international exchange of reliable data?
Kakšne ukrepe bo sprejela, da bo zagotovila, da nacionalni regulativni organi civilnega letalstva obravnavajo pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti na osnovi revizij ICAO in izboljšajo varnost v letalstvu ter zagotovijo visoko raven zmogljivosti za nadzor?
What measures will it take to ensure that national regulatory civil aviation authorities address safety deficiencies based on ICAO audits and improve aviation safety as well as ensuring a high level of oversight capability?
Lahko navede, koliko drugih držav je sprejelo zakonodajo o „črni listi“, podobno tisti Evropske unije?
Can it indicate how many other countries have adopted similar blacklist legislation to that of the European Union?
UL L 344, 27.12.2005, str.
OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0025/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0025/10
Zadeva: Davki na finančne transakcije
Subject: Financial transaction taxes
Evropski svet je poudaril, kako pomembno je, da se obnovi gospodarski in družbeni dogovor med finančnimi institucijami in družbo, ki ji služijo, ter se zagotovi, da bo javnost deležna uspehov razcveta in zaščitena pred tveganji.
The European Council has emphasised the importance of renewing the economic and social contract between financial institutions and the society they serve and of ensuring that the public benefits in good times and is protected from risk.
Evropski svet je v zvezi s tem spodbudil MDS, naj v svojem poročilu preuči različne možnosti, med drugim tudi globalno obdavčitev finančnih transakcij.
The European Council has encouraged in this context the IMF to consider the full range of options including, amongst others, a global financial transaction levy in its review.
Evropski svet je glede na to tudi pozval Svet in Komisijo, naj opredelita ključna načela, ki jih bo treba spoštovati v novi svetovni ureditvi.
In this regard, the European Council has also called on the Council and the Commission to identify the key principles which new global arrangements would need to respect.
Predsednik Barroso je na zasedanju Parlamenta 15. decembra 2009 izjavil, da meni, da je svetovni davek na finančne transakcije zelo dobra zamisel, zlasti v zvezi z inovativnim financiranjem politik na področju podnebnih sprememb.
President Barroso stated in Parliament on 15 December 2009 that he thought that a global financial tax is a 'very good idea', particularly with regard to innovative financing of climate change policies.
Prav tako je obvestil Parlament, da je Komisija dejavna na tem področju, da bi v ustreznem času pripravila predloge.
He also informed Parliament that the Commission was working in this area 'in order to put forward proposals at an appropriate time'.
Poleg tega je MDS v okviru zahtev z vrhunskega srečanja G-20 v Pittsburghu 24. in 25. septembra 2009 zbiral mnenja javnosti o vprašanju obdavčenja v finančnem sektorju.
Moreover, the IMF has been seeking views from the public on the matter of financial sector taxation as part of the request made by the G-20 at the Pittsburgh Summit of 24 and 25 September 2009.
Glede na opisano ozadje in v zvezi z oceno EU o vpeljavi in posledicah morebitnega davka na finančne transakcije na ravni EU in na globalni ravni, bi Komisija lahko pojasnila:
Against this background, and in the context of the EU assessing the introduction and consequences of a possible financial transaction tax (FTT) at the EU and global level, will the Commission explain:
s kakšnimi možnostmi se trenutno ukvarja v povezavi z vpeljavo davka na finančne transakcije; kakšne prednosti in slabosti vidi v možnostih v zvezi z globalnim ali evropskim davkom na finančne transakcije, vključno z izvedljivostjo in oblikami tega davka; ali bi pripravila predlog, če bi se izkazalo, da naši glavni partnerji ne uvajajo takšnega davka; ali bi bili lahko davki na finančne transakcije dopolnilno regulativno orodje v okviru reform finančnih trgov; ali bi lahko takšne davke uporabili za to, da bi omogočili dolgoročno usmerjen finančni sistem; kakšno je njeno trenutno mnenje o tem, kako bi bilo treba dodeliti ustvarjene prihodke; ali se bo zavezala časovnemu načrtu za oddajo analitične študije in ocene učinka ter po potrebi pripravila predlog?
what type of options it is currently working on with regard to the introduction of an FTT; what advantages and drawbacks it sees in the options relating to a global or EU financial transaction tax, including their feasibility and the forms they might take; whether it would make a proposal if it became clear that our main partners were not introducing such a tax; whether financial transaction taxes could be a complementary regulatory tool in the context of financial markets reforms; whether such taxes could be used to make the financial system long-term oriented; what its current thinking is on how the revenue generated should be allocated; whether it will commit to a timetable for the submission of an analytical study and an impact assessment and, if appropriate, bring forward a proposal?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0026/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0026/10
Zadeva: Preglednost in stanje pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu o boju proti ponarejanju (ACTA)
Subject: Transparency and state of play of the ACTA negotiations (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement)
Parlament je Komisijo in Svet ob različnih priložnostih pozval, naj zagotovita kar najširši dostop do dokumentov v zvezi s sporazumom ACTA, zlasti v poročilih z 18. decembra 2008 (poročilo Gianluce Suste; P6_TA(2008)0634 ; odstavka 14 in 28) in 11. marca 2009 (Michaela Cashmana; P6_TA(2009)0114 ), kjer je v odstavku 26 navedeno, da „bi morala Komisija nemudoma omogočiti javno dostopnost vseh dokumentov, povezanih s potekajočimi mednarodnimi pogajanji o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju“.
Parliament has on various occasions called on the Commission and Council to ensure the widest possible access to ACTA documents, notably in its reports of 18 Dec 2008 (Susta Report, P6_TA(2008)0634 , paragraphs 14, 28) and 11 March 2009 (Cashman Report, P6_TA(2009)0114 ), paragraph 26 of which reads: ‘The Commission should immediately make all documents related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) publicly available’.
V svoji resoluciji z 9. februarja 2010 o okvirnem sporazumu o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo ( P7_TA(2009)0009 ) je Parlament zahteval neposredno in celovito zagotavljanje informacij na vseh stopnjah pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih, zlasti o trgovinskih zadevah in drugih pogajanjih v okviru postopka odobritve, tako da se zagotovi polna učinkovitosti člena 218 PDEU.
In its Resolution of 9 February 2010 on a Framework Agreement with the Commission ( P7_TA(2009)0009 ) Parliament demands immediate and full information at every stage of negotiations on international agreements, in particular on trade matters and other negotiations involving the consent procedure, to give full effect to Article 218 TFEU.
Komisija je 27. januarja 2010 potrdila svojo zavezo o okrepljenem sodelovanju s Parlamentom v smislu te resolucije.
On 27 January 2010 the Commission gave assurances of its commitment to a reinforced association with Parliament in the terms of this resolution.
Kdaj bo Komisija Parlamentu odobrila dostop do vseh glavnih dokumentov v zvezi s sporazumom ACTA, zlasti do dokumentov o pogajalskem mandatu Sveta za sporazum ACTA, zapisnikov pogajalskih srečanj o sporazumu ACTA, osnutkov poglavij tega sporazuma in komentarjev sodelujočih v pogajanjih o teh poglavjih?
When will the Commission grant Parliament access to all primary texts relating to ACTA, in particular the ACTA negotiation mandate by the Council, the minutes of ACTA negotiation meetings, the draft chapters of ACTA, and the comments of ACTA participants on the draft chapters?
Ali je Komisija izvedla oceno učinka vpliva, ki ga bo imelo izvajanje sporazuma ACTA na e-trgovino v EU in po svetu?
Has the Commission carried out an impact assessment of the effect of ACTA’s implementation on e-trade in the EU and worldwide?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bo izvajanje določb o internetu iz sporazuma ACTA popolnoma v skladu s pravnim redom Unije, in kako namerava odpraviti morebitne neskladnosti?
How will the Commission ensure that enforcement of ACTA internet provisions are fully in line with the acquis and how will it redress any incompatibilities?
Ali se Komisija strinja s tem, da se Parlamentu odobri dostop do dokumentov v zvezi s sporazumom ACTA pred začetkom veljavnosti novega okvirnega sporazuma?
Does the Commission agree that access to ACTA documents should be given to Parliament before the new Framework Agreement comes into effect?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0027/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0027/10
SEPA je začela uradno delovati januarja 2008, ko je bil vzpostavljen sistem bančnih nakazil območja SEPA.
SEPA started officially in January 2008 when the SEPA Credit Transfer (SCT) was launched.
Od novembra 2009 je na voljo tudi sistem za neposredno obremenitev SEPA.
Since November 2009, the SEPA Direct Debit (SDD) scheme has also been available.
SEPA pomeni, da se v tem območju odpravlja razlikovanje med čezmejnimi in nacionalnimi plačili, kar pomeni tudi, da prejšnje nacionalne plačilne instrumente ne bi smeli vzporedno ponujati za nedoločen čas.
SEPA implies that there is no distinction between cross-border and national payments, which further implies that legacy national instruments should not be offered in parallel indefinitely.
Vendar je datum, prvotno predviden za prehod kritične mase za sistem bančnih nakazil, sistem za neposredno bremenitev in plačila s kartico do konca leta 2010, postal nerealističen.
However, the date originally foreseen for migration of a critical mass for SCT, SDD and card payments by the end of 2010 have become unrealistic.
Uporaba standardov SEPA je še vedno slaba in predvsem omejena na čezmejna plačila.
The use of SEPA standards remains low and is mostly limited to cross-border payments.
Kandidat za komisarja za notranji trg in storitve je v svojih pisnih odgovorih na vprašalnik Parlamenta izjavil, da je kolegiju nameraval predlagati sprejetje zakonodajne pobude, ki bi določila enega ali več rokov za prehod na produkte SEPA za neposredno obremenitev in bančna nakazila, in pobudo za boljše upravljanje.
The Commissioner-designate for the Internal Market and Services stated in his written answers to Parliament’s questionnaire that he intended to propose a legislative initiative for adoption by the College with the objective of setting one or more deadlines for migration to SEPA products for direct debits and credit transfers, as well as an initiative to improve governance.
Poleg tega še niso bila dokončno rešena vprašanja o uporabi večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo (MIF), kar zadeva neposredne obremenitve v območju SEPA in plačila s kartico.
Furthermore, the issues of the application of multilateral interchange fees (MIFs) for SEPA Direct Debits and for card payments have not yet been solved definitively.
Svet ECOFIN je v svojih sklepih z dne 2. decembra 2009 navedel, da Svet "spodbuja banke in plačilne institucije, naj razvijejo in dejavno tržijo produkte in storitve v okviru sheme direktnih obremenitev SEPA, s katerimi bi zadovoljili potrebe potrošnikov, pri tem pa slednjim ponudili ravni cen, storitev, poroštev in jamstev, ki so vsaj primerljive z dejanskimi, ter tako olajšali prehod s sedanjih nacionalnih produktov direktne obremenitve na nove produkte shem direktnih obremenitev SEPA".
The ECOFIN Council conclusions of 2 December 2009 stated that the Council ‘encourages banks and payment institutions to develop and actively market attractive SDD products and services meeting customer needs, while offering customers at least comparable levels of current prices, services, security and guarantees, thereby facilitating migration from existing national direct debit products to the new SDD products’.
kdaj namerava objaviti jasen in pravno zavezujoč končni datum prehoda na instrumente SEPA, kateri datum bi to bil in kako ga je mogoče uveljaviti; kako namerava dokončno vzpostaviti pravno varnost v zvezi z uporabo večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo tako za neposredne bremenitve v okviru SEPA kot tudi za plačila s kartico; ker se zdi, da ima industrija težave pri iskanju rešitev na tem področju, kako namerava Komisija spodbujati industrijo pri pripravi ustreznih rešitev v skladu s konkurenčnim pravom; kako namerava odgovoriti na zahtevo Sveta, da je treba najpozneje do sredine leta 2010 vzpostaviti strukturo za upravljanje in nadzor SEPA, in kako bo Parlament vključen v tej strukturi; kaj namerava Komisija storiti za to, da bi Evropski svet za plačila prisilila k obravnavi zahtev končnih uporabnikov plačilnih storitev?
when it plans to announce a clear and legally binding end date for migration to SEPA instruments, what that date might be, and how it could be imposed; how it intends to definitively establish legal certainty as regards the application of a MIF, for both SEPA Direct Debits and card payments; as the industry seems to have difficulty finding solutions in this regard, how the Commission intends to encourage the industry to come up with proper solutions, in line with competition law; how it intends to answer the Council’s demand to establish before mid-2010 a SEPA governance and monitoring structure at EU level, and how the European Parliament will be involved in this structure; what the Commission plans to do to force the European Payments Council to take payment services end-users’ requests into consideration?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0028/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0028/10
Vključevanje Romov je postalo evropska tema.
Roma inclusion has become a European topic.
Drugi evropski vrh o Romih, ki ga špansko predsedstvo organizira 8. aprila 2010 v Cordobi, je priložnost za pregled dosežkov in prepoznavanje prihodnjih izzivov.
The second European Roma summit, hosted by the Spanish Presidency on 8 April 2010 in Cordoba, is a time to review achievements and recognise further challenges.
Ali namerava Svet sprejeti skupno stališče o politiki financiranja iz strukturnih in predpristopnih skladov, ki bi odražalo evropsko politično zavezo k popolni izrabi teh skladov za spodbujanje vključevanja Romov in za zagotovitev, da se pri vsakem pregledu operativnih programov in postopkov za dodeljevanje virov popolnoma upoštevajo skupna osnovna načela za vključevanje Romov ?
Does the Council intend to take a common position on structural and pre-accession funding policy, reflecting the European political commitment to fully use the opportunities of these funds to promote Roma inclusion and to ensure that the Common Basic Principles on Roma Inclusion are fully taken into account in any revisions of operational programmes and source allocation procedures?