natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Po naših informacijah je bil v zadnjih tednih okrog večjih okupiranih mest v Zahodni Sahari opažen nov prej nepoznan pojav: več kot 12.000 Saharcev, moških, žensk in otrok, prazni mesta El Aaiun, Smara in Boujdour ter postavlja šotore na njihovem obrobju.
It has come to our knowledge that in the last few weeks a new and unprecedented phenomenon has emerged around some of the major occupied cities of Western Sahara: over 12 000 Saharawi men, women and children are literally vacating their cities and setting up tents on the outskirts of El Aaiun, Smara and Boujdour.
Vse obsežnejše gibanje je nov način protesta prvotnih prebivalcev tega ozemlja zaradi neznosnih političnih in družbeno-ekonomskih razmer: zdaj niso več zgolj žrtve zatiranja, diskriminacije in različnih zlorab, temveč tudi tretjerazredni državljani lastne države.
This phenomenon, which is steadily growing, is a new way of protesting against the untenable political and socioeconomic situation of the genuine inhabitants of the Territory, who are finding themselves not only the victims of repression, discrimination and abuses of all kind, but also third-class citizens in their own country.
Saharci iz okupiranega ozemlja so priča izčrpavanju in ropanju svojih naravnih virov, od nezakonitega izkoriščanja pa nimajo nobenih koristi.
The Saharawis of the occupied areas are witnessing the depletion and plundering of their natural resources, whilst gaining no benefit from their illegal exploitation.
Zaradi tega, prav tako pa zaradi številnih omejitev in odločnega zavračanja Maroka, da bi Združeni narodi organizirali svoboden in pošten referendum, je prišlo do množičnega vala protestov, ki smo jim priča.
This, combined with all sorts of restrictions and the categorical refusal of Morocco to allow the UN to organise a free and fair referendum, has triggered the massive waves of protest which are taking place now.
Nove tabore nadzorujejo maroška vojska, policija in orožniki, ki preprečujejo oskrbo z vodo in hrano.
The newly-settled camps are being watched over by the Moroccan army, police and gendarmes and the provision of water and food is being impeded by these forces.
Zaradi zdajšnjih nečloveških razmer je veliko ljudi že zbolelo.
Many people have contracted diseases as a result of the inhumane conditions.
Po podatkih gibanja Polisario se te kritične razmere lahko sprevržejo v resnično humanitarno tragedijo z nepredvidljivimi posledicami.
According to the Polisario Front, this ongoing critical situation may develop into a genuine humanitarian tragedy with unpredictable consequences.
Ali je Komisija seznanjena s temi razmerami?
Is the Commission aware of this situation?
Kako bodo te razmere po mnenju Komisije vplivale na odnose med EU in Marokom?
What implications does it have for EU-Morocco relations?
Ali Komisija razmišlja, da bi maroško vlado pozvala, naj:
Will the Commission consider calling on the Moroccan Government to:
– odpokliče svoje oborožene sile z območja, na katerem so šotorišča, in dovoli oskrbovanje nezaščitenega civilnega prebivalstva?
– remove its security forces from the areas where the tent camps have been set up and allow all necessary supplies to reach the defenceless civilian population?
– preneha diskriminacijsko politiko do Saharcev, kršenje njihovih človekovih pravic ter ropanje naravnih virov na njihovem ozemlju?
– halt its policy of discrimination and abuses of human rights against the Saharawi people, as well as the plundering of the natural resources of the Territory?
– spoštuje mednarodne obveze in prebivalcem Zahodne Sahare omogoči prosto odločanje o njihovi prihodnosti na svobodnem in pravičnem referendumu, kar je edina možnost za prenehanje konflikta?
– honour its international commitments and allow the people of Western Sahara to decide on their future in a free and fair referendum, the only possible way to bring an end to the conflict?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0174/2010
Question for oral answer O-0174/2010
Zadeva: Razmere v Zahodni Sahari
Subject: Situation in Western Sahara
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0175/2010
Question for oral answer O-0175/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Pridobitev informacij o stroških pregledovanja prošenj prosilcev za azil v državah članicah
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Transmission of information on the cost of examining asylum seekers' applications in the Member States
Komisija je 8. septembra 2010 Parlamentu in Svetu predložila poročilo o izvajanju Direktive 2005/85/ES z dne 1. decembra 2005 o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje in odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah (KOM(2010)0465).
The Commission report to Parliament and the Council on the application of Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status (COM(2010)0465) was presented on 8 September 2010.
Iz poročila je jasno, da je potrebna prenova Direktive 2005/85/ES.
This report clearly establishes the need for a recast of Directive 2005/85/EC.
Dejansko so postopki v različnih državah članicah zelo neskladni, zaradi česar prihaja do velikih razlik v kakovosti sprejema prosilcev za azil.
Indeed, there is great disparity in the procedures implemented by the Member States, leading to widely differing results in terms of the quality of the reception of asylum seekers.
V poročilu Komisija trdi, da bi lahko predhodna obravnava omogočila hitrejšo identifikacijo oseb, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za azil, kar bi pripeljalo do znatnih prihrankov.
In its report, the Commission claims that frontloading might allow more timely identification of those who do or do not qualify for asylum, leading to significant savings.
Na tehničnem sestanku 29. septembra 2010 je Komisija priznala, da nima konkretnih podatkov iz držav članic o finančnih stroških (tolmači, pravna pomoč itd.) izvajanja direktive iz leta 2005.
At a technical meeting on 29 September 2010, however, the Commission recognised that it lacked concrete information from the Member States concerning the financial costs (interpreters, legal assistance, etc.) of implementing the 2005 directive.
Podatki o teh stroških so bistveni za zanesljivo in natančno ocenitev prihrankov ali dodatnih stroškov na dolgi rok.
Yet it is crucial to obtain information on these costs in order to generate a reliable, accurate assessment of the savings or additional costs that would result in the long term.
Ali je Komisija prosila države članice za podatke o pričakovanih stroških uvedbe brezplačne pravne pomoči na prvi stopnji?
Has the Commission asked Member States for information on the expected costs of introducing free legal assistance at first instance?
Ali se Svet zavezuje, da bo Komisiji in Parlamentu dal podatke o stroških pregledovanja prošenj prosilcev za azil v državah članicah?
Will the Council commit itself to providing the Commission and Parliament with information on the cost of examining asylum seekers’ applications in the Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0176/2010
Question for oral answer O-0176/2010
Iz zaključka poročila je jasno, da je potrebna prenova Direktive 2005/85/ES.
This report clearly establishes the need for a recast of Directive 2005/85/EC.
Ali se zavezuje, da bo za Parlament pripravila primerjalno študijo o tem vprašanju?
Will it commit itself to providing Parliament with a comparative study on the subject?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0177/2010
Question for oral answer O-0177/2010
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Posredovanje informacij Parlamentu in Komisiji o odprtih vprašanjih v Svetu v zvezi z direktivo o azilnih postopkih
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Transmission of information to Parliament and the Commission on the outstanding issues in the Council on the Procedure Directive
8. septembra je bilo predstavljeno poročilo Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu o izvajanju Direktive z dne 1. decembra 2005 o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje in odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah (KOM(2010)0465).
The Commission report to the Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the Directive of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status in Member States (COM(2010)0465) was presented on 8 September.
Iz tega poročila je jasno razvidno, da obstajajo razlike med postopki za odobritev azila v posameznih državah članicah.
This report clearly shows the disparity between the asylum procedures of the Member States.
Že zaradi tega je nujna prenovitev direktive (2005/85/ES) iz leta 2005.
This alone establishes the urgent need for a recast of the 2005 Directive (2005/85/EC).
Na tehničnem sestanku 29. septembra je Komisija tudi priznala, da nima bistvenih podatkov iz številnih držav članic, ki so vključene v izvajanje direktive iz leta 2005.
During a technical meeting on 29 September the Commission also recognized that it lacked substantial information from a significant number of Member States involved in the implementation of the 2005 Directive.
To ji onemogoča, da bi Svetu pomagala pri reševanju odprtih vprašanj, ki zavirajo pogajanja.
This is preventing the Commission from assisting Council in resolving any outstanding issues blocking the negotiations.
Ali lahko Svet navede, katera so odprta vprašanja pri doseganju skupnega stališča v zvezi z direktivo o azilnih postopkih, vključno z utemeljitvami posameznih držav članic, da bi ponovno začeli pogajanja o tem pomembnem azilnem svežnju in dosegli zastavljeni rok?
Could the Council outline the outstanding issues involved in reaching a common position on the procedures directive, including the arguments of the various Member States, in order to relaunch the negotiations on this crucial file of the asylum package and achieve our target date?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0178/2010
Question for oral answer O-0178/2010
v imenu Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja Zadeva: Industrija kokoši nesnic v EU - prepoved uporabe neizpopolnjenih kletk od leta 2012
on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development Subject: The EU laying hen industry - the ban on the use of unenriched cages from 2012
Uporaba neizpopolnjenih kletk bo s 1. januarjem 2012 prepovedana, kakor je predvideno z Direktivo 1999/74/ES o zaščiti kokoši nesnic.
From 1 January 2012, the use of unenriched cages for laying hens will be banned, as provided for by Directive 1999/74/EC on the protection of laying hens.
Ali lahko Komisija poroča o napredku držav članic pri pripravah na prepoved vzreje kokoši nesnic v običajni baterijski reji od 1. januarja 2012?
Could the Commission report on the progress being made by the Member States in preparing for the ban on the rearing of laying hens in conventional batteries from 1 January 2012?
Katere ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela proti državam članicam, v katerih pridelovalci ne bodo upoštevali navedenega roka?
What action will the Commission take against a Member State in which producers fail to comply with the 1 January 2012 deadline?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da jajca, ki so proizvedena v sistemih, neskladnih z veljavno zakonodajo, ne bodo dana na trg EU, da bi tako ohranila enake konkurenčne pogoje na trgu jajc v EU?
So as to maintain a level playing field in the EU egg market, how will the Commission ensure that eggs produced in systems not compliant with the legislation in force are not placed on the EU market?
Katere ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela, da bi preprečila morebitno nepravično konkurenco iz tretjih držav na evropskem trgu jajc po 1. januarju 2012?
What measures will the Commission take to prevent any possible unfair competition from third countries on the European egg market after 1 January 2012?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0179/2010
Question for oral answer O-0179/2010
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Trenutno stanje glede predloga Komisije o prenovi Direktive o azilnem postopku
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: State of play regarding the Commission proposal for a recast of the Asylum Procedures Directive
Kot je že bilo povedano na drugih mestih, je iz poročila Komisije z dne 8. septembra 2010 o uporabi Direktive 2005/85/ES o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah (KOM(2010)0465) razvidno, da se postopkovna jamstva po celotni EU medsebojno zelo razlikujejo zaradi pogosto nejasno in dvoumno izraženih standardov v direktivi.
As previously stated elsewhere, the Commission report of 8 September 2010 on the application of Directive 2005/85/EC on minimum standards on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status in Member States (COM(2010)0465) shows that procedural guarantees vary considerably across the EU owing to the often vague and ambiguous standards laid down in the directive.
Poročilo Komisije jasno ugotavlja, da je za popolno uskladitev na tem področju potrebna prenova Direktive 2005/85/ES.
This Commission report clearly establishes the need for a recast of Directive 2005/85/EC (referred to hereafter as the Asylum Procedures Directive) in order to achieve full harmonisation in this area.
Tudi Stockholmski program poudarja in potrjuje zavezo o vzpostavitvi skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema do leta 2012.
In addition, the Stockholm Programme underlines and confirms the commitment to create a Common European Asylum System by 2012.
Da bi EU izpolnila to obvezo, ki je med drugim del Stockholmskega programa do leta 2012, zlasti za zagotovitev višjih in bolje usklajenih zaščitnih standardov, morata Svet in Parlament nujno narediti nadaljnje korake za prenovo Direktive o azilnem postopku.
In order for the EU to honour this commitment – included inter alia in the Stockholm Programme – by 2012, notably with a view to guaranteeing higher, more harmonised protection standards, it is urgent to move forward within the Council and Parliament on the recast of the Asylum Procedures Directive.
Skladno s tem je ob upoštevanju potekajočih pogajanj nujno treba pojasniti več vprašanj.
Accordingly, in view of the ongoing negotiations, several matters need to be clarified as a matter of urgency.
Ali Svet lahko pove, do katere točke je prišel v razpravah o predlogu Komisije, ki je bil predložen 21. oktobra 2009?
Can the Council indicate the point it has reached in discussing the Commission proposal presented on 21 October 2009?
Ali lahko podrobneje pojasni, kakšna je njegova prvotna ocena besedila in med drugim poda podrobnosti težav, ki so se pojavile?
Can it elaborate on its initial evaluation of this text, inter alia giving details of the difficulties raised?
Nekatere države članice so izrazile skrb glede predlagane prenove, zlasti v povezavi s finančnimi posledicami predloga Komisije.
Some Member States have expressed concerns about the proposed recast, especially as regards the financial implications of the Commission proposal.
Ali glede na to Svet lahko pojasni, zakaj bi predlagana prenova dolgoročno povzročila velike finančne stroške?
Can the Council explain, therefore, why the proposed recast would generate significant financial costs in the long term?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0180/2010
Question for oral answer O-0180/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Regija Sahel
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: The Sahel region
Razmere v regiji Sahel v Sahari so se v zadnjih letih precej poslabšale in vse bolj ogrožajo varnost držav v regiji in varnost Evropske unije.
The situation in the Sahel-Sahara strip has worsened considerably over the past few years and constitutes a growing security issue for countries in the region and for the European Union.
Terorizem in čezmejni organiziran kriminal se povečujeta v tej regiji, ki je blizu mejam Evrope.
Terrorism and transnational organised crime are rising in this region, close to Europe's borders.
V zadnjih treh letih je Al Kajda v islamskem Magrebu večkrat napadla evropske državljane in je v Nigerju, Maliju in Mavretaniji celo usmrtila več britanskih in francoskih državljanov.
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) has for the last 3 years been targeting European citizens, even executing several British and French nationals in Niger, Mali and Mauritania.
Al Kajda je nedavno ponovila svoja neposredna opozorila in grožnje proti evropskim interesom.
They have recently renewed their direct warnings and threats against European interests.
Različne vrste trgovine na tem območju (droge, orožje, tihotapljenje ljudi) so dosegle zaskrbljujočo raven.
The various traffics in the area – drugs, arms, human smuggling – have now reached a worrying scale.
Te sedanje grožnje kažejo, da je treba povečati zavezo Evropske unije v regiji.
These current threats show the need to increase the commitment of the European Union in the region.
Precejšnje prizadevanje je že bilo vloženo v smislu tehnične pomoči: Komisija in generalni sekretariat Sveta sta sprejela pristop k tej regiji, ki združuje razvoj in varnost, bile so napotene misije na to področje ter opredeljeni projekti v okviru desetega Evropskega razvojnega sklada in instrumenta za stabilnost.
Significant efforts have already been made in terms of technical assistance: the Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council have adopted an approach targeting this region which combines development and security, missions have been sent on the ground and projects identified in the framework of the 10th EDF as well as the Instrument for Stability.
Poleg tega so nekatere države članice sprožile ukrepe za sodelovanje z zadevnimi državami v regiji.
Moreover, certain Member States have launched cooperation actions with affected states in the region.
Ti ukrepi so koristni, vendar ne zadoščajo za reševanje izzivov, s katerimi se sooča regija.
These actions are useful but not sufficient given the challenges faced by the region.
Evropska unija lahko stori več.
The European Union has the potential to go further.
EU bi morala vzpostaviti poseben politični dialog z državami v regiji in spodbujati sodelovanje med različnimi regionalnimi akterji.
The EU should engage in a specific political dialogue with countries in the region and foster cooperation between the different regional actors.
To zahteva politično vključevanje na najvišji ravni.
This requires political involvement at the highest level.
Za spremljanje takšnega vključevanja bi morala EU uporabiti širok nabor instrumentov v okviru celovite strategije, ki temelji na političnih, varnostnih in razvojnih izzivih.
To accompany this involvement, the EU should use its wide range of instruments as part of a comprehensive strategy, building on political, security and development challenges.
Ti instrumenti bi morali zagotoviti izvajanje politik za trajnostni razvoj in izgradnjo zmogljivosti države.
These instruments should implement sustainable development policies and build up state capacities.
Kako namerava Svet uvrstiti to vprašanje na dnevni red in spodbuditi sprejetje skupne evropske strategije za regijo Sahel?
How does the Council intend to put this issue on the agenda and foster the adoption of a common European strategy towards the Sahel region?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0181/2010
Question for oral answer O-0181/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Zaskrbljenost glede pravilne uporabe sheme EU za liberalizacijo vizumskega režima v Srbiji in v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Concerns about the correct application of the EU visa liberalisation scheme in Serbia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Svet je sklenil državljanom Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije, Črne gore in Srbije omogočiti potovanje brez vizumov na celotnem schengenskem območju.
The Council decided to grant visa-free travel to and throughout the Schengen area for citizens of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia.
To je storil s sprejetjem sprememb Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001.
It did so by adopting amendments to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Odprava vizumov velja od 19. decembra 2009 za imetnike biometričnih potnih listov.
The visa waiver applied from 19 December 2009 to holders of biometric passports.
Komisija (COM(2009)0366) je ugotovila, da so Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija, Črna gora in Srbija na dan sprejetja te uredbe izpolnjevale vsa merila, in Evropski parlament ( P7_TA(2009)0062 ) je 12. novembra 2009 glasoval za odpravo vizumov.
The Commission (COM(2009)0366) had concluded that the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia had met all the benchmarks by the date of adoption of this Regulation and the European Parliament ( P7_TA(2009)0062 ) had voted in favour of granting the visa-free regime on 12 November 2009.
Ali Komisija meni, da je upravičeno posredovanje, s katerim bi oblastem v Srbiji in Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji pomagali pri soočanju z nastalimi razmerami ter pri ustreznem obveščanju državljanov, da bi preprečili zlorabo odprave vizumov in stabilizirali število prosilcev za azil?
Does the Commission therefore not consider it would be appropriate to take action to help the national authorities responsible in Serbia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to deal with the current situation and to properly inform their citizens, in order to prevent the misuse of visa liberalisation with a view to stabilising the flows of asylum seekers?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0183/2010
Question for oral answer O-0183/2010
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Vse slabše razmere v Zahodni Sahari
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Worsening situation in Western Sahara
Glede na številna poročila so se v zadnjih tednih razmere na zasedenih ozemljih Zahodne Sahare zelo poslabšale.
According to numerous reports, the situation in the occupied territories of the Western Sahara has significantly deteriorated in recent weeks.
Več kot 12 000 zahodnosaharskih moških, žensk in otrok je zapustilo svoje kraje in postavilo šotore v predmestju mest El Aaiun, Smara in Boujdour v znak protesta zaradi izkoriščanja naravnih virov Zahodne Sahare in svojega neznosnega socialno-gospodarskega položaja, pa tudi zaradi vztrajnega zavračanja Maroka, da bi OZN organizirala svoboden in pravičen referendum o usodi Zahodne Sahare.
Over 12 000 Sahrawi men, women and children have left their cities and set up tents in the outskirts of the cities El Aaiun, Smara and Boujdour in protest at the ongoing exploitation of Western Sahara’s natural resources and their dire socioeconomic situation, as well as the persistent refusal of Morocco to allow a free and fair referendum to be organised by the UN on the fate of the Western Sahara.
Med slabšanjem teh razmer so maroški vojaki, ki nadzirajo taborišča, 24. oktobra do smrti ustrelili 14-letnega fanta Al-Nagema Al-Qarhia.
In the midst of this deteriorating situation, a 14-year old boy, Al-Nagem Al-Qarhi, was shot dead on 24 October by Moroccan military officers who oversee the camps.
Po poročanju je bil ustreljen v avtomobilu, ki je prinašal zaloge v eno od taborišč, ki so jih postavili saharski protestniki.
According to the reports, he was shot while in a car bringing supplies to one of the camps set up by Sahrawi protesters.
Veliko ljudi iz taborišč je tudi že zbolelo zaradi nehumanih pogojev, ker je maroška vojska postavila blokado okoli teh območij.
Many people in the camps have also started to suffer from illness related to the new inhumane conditions, due to the Moroccan army blockade of the areas.
Razmere v taboriščih v Zahodni Sahari in Tindufu se lahko sprevržejo v resnično humanitarno tragedijo z nepredvidljivimi posledicami.
The situation in the camps in the Western Sahara and Tindouf may develop into a real humanitarian tragedy with unpredictable consequences.
Ali Svet razmišlja, da bi maroško vlado pozvala, naj:
Will the Council consider calling upon the Moroccan Government to:
– zagotovi, da bo humanitarna pomoč in druga oskrba neovirano prispela do civilnega prebivalstva v taboriščih?
– ensure that humanitarian assistance and other supplies reach the civilian population in the camps unhindered?
– preneha diskriminacijsko politiko do saharskega prebivalstva, kršenje njihovih človekovih pravic ter ropanje naravnih virov na njihovem ozemlju?
– put an end to its policy of discrimination and abuses of human rights against the Sahrawi people, as well as the plundering of their natural resources?