natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zaradi številnih priseljencev, ki vsako leto pridejo v EU, pogosto v tragičnih okoliščinah, morajo države članice sodelovati pri upravljanju preseljevanja.
The arrival each year of many immigrants in the EU, often in tragic circumstances, is forcing Member States to cooperate on the management of migration.
Oblikovanje uravnotežene politike priseljevanja bi moralo koristiti tako severnemu kot tudi južnemu delu celine.
The creation of a balanced immigration policy should benefit both the north and the south of the continent.
Predhodni ukrepi, kot so modra karta in direktiva o vračanju, so že bili sprejeti.
Preliminary steps such as the "Blue Card" and the "return directive" have already been taken.
Cilj prihodnjega zakonodajnega obdobja bo razvoj usklajene migracijske politike, ki bo humana in odprta za zakonito priseljevanje, vendar stroga do nezakonitega priseljevanja.
A goal of the next legislature will be the development of a coordinated migration policy which is humane, open to legal immigration but firm on illegal immigration.
Če bo začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba, bo imel Evropski parlament vsa zakonodajna pooblastila na tem področju.
If the Lisbon Treaty enters into force, the European Parliament will have full legislative powers in this domain.
Uravnoteženi pristop k upravljanju priseljevanja
A balanced approach to managing immigration
Ker je Parlament v sedanji sestavi že obravnaval sporno direktivo o vračanju, bo izziv za Parlament v prihodnji sestavi zaustaviti tragedije, ki jih povzroča nezakonito priseljevanje, ter spodbujati poti za zakonito priseljevanje, zlasti v sektorjih, v katerih primanjkuje delovne sile.
The current Parliament having already dealt with the highly controversial "return directive", the challenge for the next Parliament will be to end the tragedies caused by illegal immigration and to promote channels for legal immigration, especially in sectors with labour shortages.
To pa odpira druga vprašanja, zlasti kako se učinkovito boriti proti neprijavljenemu delu.
This in its turn raises other questions, notably how to combat undeclared work effectively.
Spodbujanje zakonitega priseljevanja na podlagi gospodarskih potreb držav članic odpira tudi vprašanje enakih pravic med delavci in nediskriminacije.
In addition, promoting legal immigration based on the economic needs of Member States raises the issue of equal rights between workers and non-discrimination.
In nazadnje, kakšen status naj dobijo sezonski delavci, ki v glavnem delajo v kmetijstvu in pogosto zelo kratka obdobja?
Lastly, what status should be given to seasonal labourers, who work mainly in farming, often for very short periods?
Ta vprašanja obravnava predlagani osnutek evropske zakonodaje.
Draft European legislation is being proposed on these matters.
Evropski parlament razmišlja tudi o begu možganov, ki bi ga lahko povzročila politika iskanja kvalificiranih delavcev iz držav zunaj EU.
The European Parliament is also wondering about the brain drain that could be caused by a policy of seeking to attract skilled workers from non-EU countries.
Kako bi lahko spodbudili krožno preseljevanje, s katerim bi se delavci izučili v Uniji in se nato vrnili domov ter koristili svoji državi izvora?
How can "circular" migration be encouraged, by which workers would develop their skills in the Union and then return home, enabling their country of origin to benefit?
Oblikovanje učinkovitejšega azilnega sistema, temelječega na solidarnosti
Creating a more effective asylum system based on solidarity
Parlament v prihodnji sestavi se bo spopadel tudi z vprašanjem, kako naj Evropska unija sprejema prosilce za azil, ter o prihodnosti dublinskega sistema, ki bi naj določal države članice, pristojne za obravnavo vloge za azil, ter opredeljeval razumne roke za postopke.
The next Parliament will also tackle the issue of how the European Union receives asylum seekers, and the future of the Dublin system, which is supposed to identify the Member States responsible for processing an asylum application and establish reasonable deadlines for procedures.
Prosilci za azil morajo v nekaterih državah članicah na rešitev vloge v praksi pogosto čakati več mesecev ali celo let, v zelo različnih pogojih, saj so v nekaterih državah pridržani, v drugih pa ne.
In practice, asylum seekers often have to wait months if not years in certain Member States – in greatly differing conditions, as some countries use detention while others do not - until their application is finally processed.
Poleg tega so poslanci večkrat opozorili na premajhno zaupanje med državami članicami ter neenako breme obdelave vlog prosilcev za azil – v južnih državah članicah je upravna obremenitev največja.
In addition, MEPs have pointed several times to the lack of trust between Member States and the unequal burden-sharing of processing asylum-seekers applications – the southern Member States having to deal with the biggest administrative burden.
Sistem bo treba prilagoditi tako, da bo zagotavljal hitrejšo obravnavo vlog za azil in nudil orodje, ki bo ustvarilo zaupanje med državami članicami.
The system will need to be adapted to process asylum applications more quickly and devise a tool which creates trust between Member States.
Sveženj na področju azila, ki je bil predstavljen decembra, vsebuje več predlogov, ki jih bodo obravnavali poslanci, da bi našli odgovore na ta vprašanja.
The "asylum package", unveiled in December, contains several proposals on which MEPs will be working to find answers to these questions.
Nadzor zunanjih meja ter prihodnost agencije FRONTEX
External border surveillance and the future of the FRONTEX agency
Agencija FRONTEX, ustanovljena oktobra 2005 za poenostavitev operativnega sodelovanja na področju zunanjih meja EU v boju proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju, potrebuje srednjeročno strategijo, v skladu s parlamentarnim poročilom, sprejetim decembra lani.
Lastly, the FRONTEX agency, launched in October 2005 to facilitate operational cooperation on the EU's external borders as part of the fight against illegal immigration, needs to have a medium-term strategy, according to a parliamentary report adopted last December.
Poslanci so prepričani, da je materialna podpora (letala, čolni, itd.) agencije preveč odvisna od dobre volje držav članic.
MEPs believe the Agency suffers from its dependence on the goodwill of the Member States for material (planes, boats, etc.).
Ali naj ima svoja sredstva ali naj ostane platforma za sodelovanje?
Should it have its own resources or stay as a platform for cooperation?
Poslanci obravnavajo sistem obvezne solidarnosti, po katerem bodo morale države članice zagotavljati agenciji FRONTEX materialno podporo.
MEPs are considering a system of compulsory solidarity, requiring Member States to give material support to FRONTEX.
Terorizem in varnost
Terrorism and security
Ravnotežje med varnostjo in zaščito na eni strani ter zasebnostjo in temeljnimi pravicami na drugi bo prav tako eno od ključnih vprašanj.
The balance between security and protection on the one hand and privacy and fundamental rights on the other will also be key issues.
Države članice, ki že imajo sistem za odzivanje na napade te vrste, morajo biti sposobne deliti svoje metode z drugimi državami članicami in po potrebi ponuditi pomoč.
Member States which already have a system for responding to this type of attack need to be able to share their methods with other Member States and, if necessary, provide them with help.
Potreben bo tudi strožji nadzor snovi, ki so potrebne za pripravo umazane bombe.
Stricter surveillance of the substances needed to concoct a dirty bomb will also be needed.
Pregledati bo treba tudi zakonodajo o pomoči žrtvam, da bo fizično ali psihološko zdravljenje ustrezalo najboljšim razpoložljivim standardom v EU.
Legislation on assistance to victims will also be examined, to bring treatment, whether physical or psychological, up to the best available standards in the EU.
Varovanje svoboščin in zaščita podatkov
Safeguarding freedoms and protecting data
Vprašanje, kako daleč lahko sežejo protiteroristični ukrepi, ne da bi posegli v državljanske svoboščine, kot so pravica do zasebnosti in svoboda izražanja, postaja vedno bolj pereče.
The question of how far anti-terrorist measures can go without impinging on civil liberties such as the right to privacy and freedom of expression will become more pressing.
V prihodnjih letih bo ključnega pomena varovanje osebnih podatkov ter zlasti digitalnih podatkov.
In coming years the protection of personal data and of digital data in particular will be crucial.
Take podatke, ki vsebujejo vrsto informacij o tem, kdo smo in kaj delamo, obdelujejo številni javni ali zasebni izvajalci, ki so javnosti pogosto neznani, v komercialne ali varnostne namene.
Such data, containing a mass of information on who we are and what we do, is processed by many public or private operators, often unknown by the public, for commercial or security purposes.
Večina poslancev Evropskega parlamenta je v preteklosti že večkrat opozarjala na površen pristop držav članic k varstvu osebnih podatkov.
A majority of Members of the European Parliament has repeatedly voiced concern in the past at the casual approach of Member States to the protection of personal data.
Eden takih primerov je evidenca imen letalskih potnikov (PNR), ki vsebuje številne podatke o posameznem potniku, kot so narodnost, naslov, načrt potovanja in številka kreditne kartice.
An example is the case of Passenger Name Records (PNR), covering a range of data on individual passengers, such as nationality, address, itinerary and credit card number).
Zaradi boja proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu jih zbirajo v številnih državah članicah, pričakuje pa se, da bo v bližnji prihodnosti uveden sistem na evropski ravni.
These are collected in several Member States in order to combat terrorism and organised crime, and a system at European level is expected to be introduced in the near future.
Vprašanje pa je, ali boj proti terorizmu upravičuje tako poseganje v zasebno življenje navadnih ljudi.
The question is whether the fight against terrorism justifies such an intrusion into the private lives of ordinary people.
Ta zakonodaja bo na dnevnem redu Parlamenta v prihodnji sestavi, enako kot zakonodaja o varstvu podatkov, ki se uporabljajo v kazenskem postopku.
This legislation will be on the next Parliament's work list, as will legislation on the protection of data used in criminal proceedings.
Kmetijstvo: nova reforma, ki bo potekala v okviru proračunskih razprav in novih globalnih razmer
Agriculture: new reform to take place in the context of the budget debate and the new global situation
Junija 2009 izvoljeni poslanci bodo sodelovali pri pripravi na naslednji večji pregled SKP, ki je v načrtu leta 2013.
MEPs elected in June 2009 will take part in preparations for the next major overhaul of the CAP, scheduled for 2013.
Če bo Lizbonska pogodba ratificirana, bo Parlamentu dodelila pooblastila za skupno odločanje z ministri za kmetijstvo na tem področju.
The Lisbon Treaty, if ratified, will give Parliament joint-decision making powers with agriculture ministers in this area.
Večina sedaj veljavnih odločitev o skupni kmetijski politiki (SKP) bo potekla leta 2013.
Most current decisions on the common agriculture policy (CAP) will expire in 2013.
Revidirati bo treba zlasti pomoči za kmetije in različne instrumente za reguliranje trga, kot so mlečne kvote, ki bodo potekli.
In particular, farm aid and various market regulation instruments such as dairy quotas which are due to expire will have to be reviewed.
Zato mora Evropska unija v zakonodajnem obdobju 2009-2014 izvesti novo, obsežno reformo.
The European Union therefore has to carry out a new, wide-ranging reform during the 2009-2014 legislative period.
Pogajanja o naslednjem dolgoročnem proračunskem načrtu EU, ki bo zajemal obdobje po letu 2013, bodo ponovno sprožila razprave o deležu proračuna za SKP in na ta način vplivala na reformo.
Negotiations on the EU's next long-term budget plan, covering the post-2013 period, are bound to relaunch the debate on the CAP's share of the budget and thus influence the reform.
Zneski, ki bodo dodeljeni kmetijski politiki, bodo v veliki meri odvisni od obsega in trajanja sedanje gospodarske krize in finančnega zdravja držav članic v času, ko bodo potekali pogovori.
The sums to be allocated to agriculture policy will greatly depend on the scale and duration of the current economic crisis and the financial health of Member States when the talks are held.
Poleg tega bosta dvig cen hrane v letih 2007/2008 in možnost večjega nihanja cen v kmetijstvu usmerila pozornost na vlogo SKP v varnosti svetovne preskrbe s hrano.
In addition, the rise of food prices in 2007/2008 and the prospect of greater volatility in agricultural prices have refocused attention on the role of the CAP in world food security.
V razpravo bo vključena tudi konkurenca s strani neprehrambenih izdelkov, kot so biogoriva za energijo.
Competition from non-food products such as biofuels for energy will be part of the debate.
Ključne značilnosti reforme bodo verjetno prihodnost politike razvoja podeželja pri ohranjanju ozemeljske kohezije ter pričakovanja javnosti, zlasti glede kakovosti, varovanja okolja in dobrega počutja živali.
Lastly, the future of rural development policy in preserving territorial cohesion and the public's expectations, notably as regards quality, respect for the environment and animal welfare, will probably be key features of the reform.
Nova podnebna realnost
New climate realities
Evropsko kmetijstvo se mora pripraviti na podnebne spremembe in se jim prilagoditi.
European farming must prepare for climate change and adapt.
Posledice bo občutilo poljedelstvo (več suš in slabše letine na jugu, večje tveganje za naravne nesreče, itd.) in živinoreja (nove bolezni ali mutacije obstoječih virusov, z resnimi posledicami za zdravje in ekonomijo).
There will be consequences for arable farming (more drought and smaller harvests in the south, an increased risk of natural disasters, etc.) and for livestock production (new diseases or mutations of existing viruses, with serious health and economic consequences).
Poleg tega bodo pogajanja o razmerah po Kjotu ponudila priložnost za premislek o sedanjih proizvodnih modelih in za razvoj sistemov, ki povzročajo manj onesnaževanja.
In addition, negotiations on the post-Kyoto situation will provide an opportunity to reflect on current production models and devise less polluting systems.
Ta nova realnost se bo postopoma morala odražati v političnih odločitvah o kmetijstvu .
This new reality will have to be reflected gradually in policy decisions on agriculture.
Možne nove odgovornosti poslancev
Possible new responsibilities for MEPs
Če bo začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba, se bo postopek soodločanja uporabljal za večino odločitev, sprejetih v kmetijski politiki, kar bo poslancem prineslo novo odgovornost, Svetu ministrov pa obveznost pogajanja z Evropskim parlamentom, ki je sedaj ni.
If the Lisbon Treaty enters into force, codecision will apply to most decisions taken on agricultural policy, with new responsibilities for MEPs and an obligation for the Council of Ministers to negotiate with the EP, which is currently not the case.
To bo pomagalo okrepiti demokratično legitimnost SKP v očeh javnosti .
This will help reinforce the democratic legitimacy of the CAP in the eyes of the public.
Lizbonska pogodba: večje pristojnosti za Evropski parlament
The Lisbon Treaty: more powers for the European Parliament
Če in ko bodo države članice Evropske unije ratificirale lizbonsko pogodbo, bodo s tem vzpostavile pravni okvir in orodja, ki jih Evropa potrebuje za soočanje s svojimi najbolj perečimi izzivi.
If and when ratified by EU Member States, the Lisbon Treaty would create the legal framework and tools needed to meet Europe's most pressing challenges.
S tem, ko bi neposredno izvoljeni Parlament dobil večje pristojnosti, bi EU postala bolj odgovorna.
By giving the directly elected Parliament more power, it would make the EU more accountable.
Z nekaj izjemami bi Evropski parlament pri pripravi zakonodaje postal enakovreden Svetu in bi zastopal države članice EU na področjih, kjer to do sedaj ni bilo mogoče, zlasti pri oblikovanju proračuna EU (kjer bi bil Parlament popolnoma enakopraven), kmetijske politike ter na področju sodstva in notranjih zadev.
With a few exceptions, it would place the European Parliament (EP) on an equal footing as lawmaker with the Council, representing EU Member States, in areas where this has not been case so far, notably in setting the EU budget (Parliament would enjoy full parity), agriculture policy and justice and home affairs.
Nacionalni parlamenti bi pridobili pravico do nasprotovanja predlogu, če bi menili, da bi bilo mogoče določen rezultat doseči bolje na nacionalni ravni kakor na ravni EU.
National parliaments would gain the right to object to a proposal if they felt that a given result could be better attained at national rather than EU level.
Predsednika Komisije bi izbrali predsedniki vlad EU na podlagi rezultatov evropskih volitev, odobril pa bi ga Evropski parlament.
A Commission President would be selected by EU heads of government on the basis of the European election results and approved by the EP.
Soglasje Parlamenta bi bilo potrebno tudi za imenovanje visokega predstavnika EU za zunanje zadeve.
The appointment of the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs would also be subject to Parliament's consent.
Več pravic in jasnosti za državljane
More rights and clarity for citizens
Okrepile bi se tudi pravice državljanov.
Citizens' rights would also be strengthened.
S pogodbo bi na primer Listina EU o temeljnih pravicah postala zavezujoča za Evropsko unijo samo, kar pomeni, da bi njene institucije morale spoštovati državljanske, politične, ekonomske in socialne pravice državljanov.
For example, the Treaty would make the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights binding upon the EU itself, thus requiring EU institutions to respect citizens' civil, political, economic or social rights.
Nova pravica do državljanske pobude bi skupinam, ki bi jim uspelo zbrati milijon podpisov, omogočila, da bi Komisijo pozvali k pripravi predlogov za nove politike, kar bi povečalo sodelovanje državljanov pri odločanju v EU.
A new right of Citizens' Initiative would enable groups who can muster one million signatures to call upon the Commission to put forward new policy proposals, thus increasing citizens' participation in EU decision-making.
Cilj pogodbe je tudi izboljšati učinkovitost postopka odločanja EU tako, da se poveča uporaba glasovanja s kvalificirano večino na račun soglasja, kar bi olajšalo doseganje sporazuma v Svetu ministrov.
The Treaty also aims to improve the efficiency of the EU's decision-making process by increasing the use of qualified majority voting, replacing unanimity, and thus facilitating agreements in the Council of Ministers.
Novi predsednik Evropskega sveta in visoki predstavnik za zunanjo politiko bi morala povečati doslednost ukrepov EU.
The new European Council President and the High Representative for foreign policy should improve the consistency of EU action.
Večje zakonodajne pristojnosti za Evropski parlament
More legislative power for the European Parliament
V skladu z lizbonsko pogodbo bi postal Evropski parlament sozakonodajalec s Svetom na številnih novih področjih.
The Lisbon Treaty would make Parliament a co-legislator with the Council in a series of new fields.
Za nekatera od teh, ki so sedaj v celoti v pristojnosti Sveta, bi se uporabljal postopek soodločanja.
Some of these, currently dealt with only by the Council, would be handled under the co-decision procedure.
Druga pa so popolnoma nova področja politik EU.
Others are completely new policy areas for the EU.
Obstoječe politike EU, za katere bi začel veljati postopek soodločanja (nepopoln seznam)
Existing EU policies which become subject to co-decision (non-exhaustive list)
Vizumi, azil (nekateri vidiki, med drugim pogoji za sprejem prosilcev), zakonito priseljevanje (vključno s pogoji za vstop in bivanje), pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah, policijsko sodelovanje, skupni finančni predpisi, ukrepi, potrebni za uporabo eura, strukturni skladi, kmetijska in ribiška politika.
Visas, asylum (some aspects, including conditions for the reception of applicants), legal immigration (including conditions of entry and residence), judicial cooperation in criminal matters, police cooperation, common financial provisions, measures necessary for the use of the Euro, structural funds, agriculture and fisheries policies.
Nova področja politik, ki jih uvaja lizbonska pogodba, za katera bi veljal postopek soodločanja (nepopoln seznam)
New policy areas to be introduced by the Lisbon Treaty which will be subject to co-decision (non-exhaustive list)
Energetika (za notranji energetski trg se že uporablja postopek soodločanja), mejne kontrole, šport, storitve v splošnem gospodarskem interesu, varstvo osebnih podatkov, priseljevanje (boj proti trgovini z ljudmi in pospeševanje združevanja), evropske pravice intelektualne lastnine, javno zdravje (ukrepi, ki določajo visoke standarde kakovosti, vendar ne usklajevanja), vesoljska politika in turizem.
Energy (energy internal market is already under co-decision), border checks, sport, services of general economic interest, personal data protection, immigration (combating human trafficking and promoting integration), European intellectual property rights, public health (measures setting high quality standards, but not harmonisation), space policy and tourism.
Stanje ratifikacij – spletna stran Evropske komisije Celotno besedilo lizbonske pogodbe – spletna stran Evropske komisije Glasovanje Parlamenta o lizbonski pogodbi – sporočilo za javnost
State of play of ratification – European Commission site Full text of Lisbon Treaty - European Commission site Parliament’s vote on the Lisbon Treaty – press release
v torek, 17. marca 2009, od 18.00 do 19.00
Tuesday 17 March 2009, 18.00 – 19.00
Sejna soba: PHS 1 A 002
Room: PHS 1 A 002
Izmenjava mnenj z namestnikom češkega ministra za zunanje zadeve in predsedujočim Svetu Janom Kohoutom o dosežkih seje Sveta za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose 16. in 17. marca 2009
Exchange of views with Mr Jan Kohout, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic and acting President-in-Office of Council, on the results of GAERC meeting of 16-17 March 2009
Parlament predstavil komunikacijsko strategijo za junijske volitve
Parliament unveils communication strategy for 4-7 June European elections
V torek je Evropski parlament javnosti predstavil komunikacijsko strategijo za bližajoče se evropske volitve.
The European Parliament’s communication strategy for the 2009 elections was unveiled to the media on Tuesday.
Podpredsednika Parlamenta Alejo Vidal-Quadras in Mechtild Rothe sta poudarila temeljno sporočilo: EU je pred izbirami, ki bodo imele posledice za vse državljane, zato lahko ti s sodelovanjem na volitvah vplivajo na odločitve in končno izbiro med več možnostmi.
EP Vice Presidents Alejo Vidal-Quadras and Mechtild Rothe outlined the key message: that the EU has major policy choices ahead which will affect the everyday lives of European citizens – and that by voting in the elections citizens can affect those choices.
Podpredsednika sta predstavila nekaj orodij, s katerimi naj bi javnosti prikazali, kakšne so lahko različne odločitve glede na politično sestavo naslednjega Evropskega parlamenta:
The two vice-Presidents set out some of the instruments the campaign will use, all designed to highlight some of the choices that may go one way or another depending on the political composition of the next European Parliament:
plakati o energetiki, podnebnih spremembah, prehrani, enakih možnostih, priseljevanju, standardizaciji, varnosti, zaščiti potrošnikov, evropskem proračunu in finančnih trgih;
billboards with themes including energy, fuel/climate change, food/agriculture, equal opportunities, borders/migration, standardisation, security, consumer protection, budget, and markets;
ulične instalacije o energetiki, mejah, zaščiti potrošnikov in varnosti;
3-dimensional street installations to complement the poster campaign, covering energy, borders/migration, consumer protection and security;