natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali se Evropski komisiji zdi primerno, upoštevajoč vrednostni obseg prometa in vpliv na trgovanje na celotnem evropskem trgu, da pravila EU o konkurenci ne zajemajo te združitve ter da bi tako lahko samo neposredno vključene nacionalne oblasti ugotavljale koncentracijo in/ali dominanten položaj na domačih trgih in na evropskem trgu, z Evropsko komisijo pa bi se posvetovale samo na lastno pobudo?
Does the Commission consider it appropriate, considering not only turnover levels, but also the impact of trading activities on the entire European market, that EU competition rules do not apply to this merger and only the national authorities directly involved would have the competence to assess the concentration aspects and/or dominant position on domestic markets and the European market, and would only need to consult the Commission at their discretion?
Zdi se namreč, da na ta način trenutno deluje Urad za pošteno trgovanje in Urad za konkurenco v Veliki Britaniji.
This currently appears to be currently the case as regards the work undertaken by the Office of Fair Trading and the Competition Commission in the UK.
Na podlagi dokazov o konkurenci med tremi velikimi evropskimi borzami, Euronext, London Stock Exchange plc in Deutsche Börse AG, obstaja utemeljena skrb, da bi lahko morebitna konsolidacija privedla do motenj v delovanju borznega trga ter do pretiranega cenovnega pritiska na borzne posrednike in stranke pri trgovanju z vrednostnimi papirji.
Given the evidence of existing competition between Europe's big three exchanges, Euronext, the London Stock Exchange plc and Deutsche Börse AG, there is a well-founded concern that a potential consolidation might disrupt exchanges' markets and create excessive pricing pressure for operators and clients in equities trading.
Kar se tiče storitev v okviru borznega trgovanja, bi lahko združitev dveh izmed borz preprečila nastanek cenovnega pritiska na cene, ki bi se sicer oblikovale na osnovi potencialne konkurence.
As for on-exchange trading services, undertaking of a merger between two of them might prevent the exertion of continuous downward pressure on prices that would have resulted from a potential rivalry.
Kakšno je stališče Komisije v zvezi z možnimi posledicami višjih provizij, ki lahko privedejo do upada transakcij in posledično negativno vplivajo na likvidnost?
What is the Commission's view of the possible consequences of higher trading fees that might lead to lower numbers of transactions with a negative impact on liquidity?
Kakšen vpliv bi imele takšne posledice na bodočo arhitekturo trga finančnih storitev v EU?
What kind of impact would such consequences have on the future architecture of the EU financial services market?
Kakšno je stališče Komisije glede posledic preoblikovanja NYSE v javno delniško družbo kot tudi glede možnih prihodnjih združitev in prevzemov na evropskem borznem trgu?
What is the view of the Commission on the impact of the conversion of the NYSE into a public listed company as well as of possible further merger and takeover developments with regard to European stock exchanges?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0070/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0070/05
Zadeva: Dialog s cerkvami in nekonfesionalnimi organizacijami
Subject: Dialogue with churches and non-confessional organisations
Evropska komisija naj bi imela v okviru Deklaracije 11 k Amsterdamski pogodbi in člena 52 Ustave novembra 2004 in aprila 2005 dvoje srečanj s predstavniki katoliške in protestantskih cerkva, islamske skupnosti, judovske skupnosti ter scientološke cerkve.
In connection with Declaration 11 to the Treaty of Amsterdam and Article 52 of the Constitution, the European Commission is said to have had two meetings, in November 2004 and in April 2005, with representatives of the Catholic and Protestant Churches, the Muslim Community, the Jewish community and the Church of Scientology.
Vabila na ti dve srečanji ni dobila niti humanistična federacija niti katera koli druga neverska organizacija, kljub zagotovilu predsednika Barrosa (v njegovem odgovoru z dne 8.2.2005 na parlamentarni vprašanji gospe De Keyser, P-3318/04 , in Baroness Ludford, E-0307/05 ), da "bo Komisija v letu 2005 uvedla postopke v duhu omenjenega člena" (tj. člen I-52 osnutka Ustave).
Neither the Humanist Federation nor any other non-religious organisation received an invitation to those meetings, despite the assurance by Mr Barroso (in his answer dated 8.2.2005 to Written Questions from Mrs De Keyser, P-3318/04 , and Baroness Ludford, E-0307/05 ) that, 'during 2005, the Commission will establish procedures which match up to the spirit of the said article' (i.e.: Article I-52 of the Draft Constitution).
Ali Evropska Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu lahko predstavi podrobnosti o zgoraj omenjenih srečanjih in razloži, zakaj humanistična federacija ni bila povabljena na srečanje v aprilu, ko je od odgovora predsednika Barrosa preteklo že precej časa?
Can the European Commission provide the European Parliament with information about the meetings referred to above and indicate why the Humanist Federation was not invited to a meeting which took place in April, i.e. well after the answer given by Mr Barroso?
Ali Evropska komisija lahko zagotovi, da bo izvajanje določb o dialogu s cerkvami, nekonfesionalnimi in filozofskimi organizacijami izpolnjevalo naslednja merila:
Can the European Commission guarantee that the implementation of the provisions on dialogue with churches, non-confessional and philosophical organisations will meet the following criteria:
dialog bo uravnotežen in bo vključeval vse sodelujoče organizacije; z nobeno od posameznih religij in gibanj ne bo vzpostavljen privilegiran odnos; dialog bo potekal na podlagi sestavljenega seznama udeležencev, objavljenega na spletni strani Komisije;
the dialogue will be balanced and inclusive with regard to the participating organisations; no preferential relations will exist with any particular religion or movement; the dialogue will take place on the basis of an established list of participants, published on the website of the Commission;
dialog bo pregleden, tako da bosta dnevni red srečanj in zapisnik objavljena, srečanja pa bodo potekala javno;
the dialogue will be transparent; in other words, the meeting agenda and minutes will be published and the meetings will take place in public;
dialog bo potekal na enaki ravni kot dialog z drugimi deli civilne družbe.
the dialogue will be put on the same footing as the dialogue with other sections of civil society.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0071/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0071/05
Zadeva: Svetovni poziv k ukrepanju proti revščini: izkoreninimo revščino
Subject: Global Call to Action Against Poverty: Making Poverty History
Kampanjo „Svetovni poziv k ukrepanju proti revščini“ je januarja 2005 ob otvoritvi Svetovnega socialnega foruma sprožil brazilski predsednik Lula.
The campaign Global Call to Action Against Poverty was launched by President Lula of Brazil at the opening of the World Social Forum in January 2005.
Nelson Mandela je februarja 2005 kampanjo začel v Veliki Britaniji.
Nelson Mandela launched the campaign in the UK in February 2005.
Njene cilje lahko povzamemo v treh točkah: povečanje količine in kakovosti pomoči, odpis dolga in pravična trgovina.
The campaign objectives can be summarised in three points: increase in the quantity and quality of aid; debt cancellation; fair trade.
Kampanja se je začela prav v letu, ki bo za boj proti revščini v svetu odločilno: julija bo potekal letni vrh G8 (Škotska), na katerem bo Afrika ena od prednostnih točk na dnevnem redu, septembra bo plenarno zasedanje ZN na visoki ravni (New York) z obsežnim pregledom izvajanja Deklaracije tisočletja ZN in napredka pri doseganju razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja (RCNT), ministrska konferenca STO v decembru 2005 pa bo morebiti odločilen korak pri ponovnem zagonu pogajanj o razvojni agendi iz Dohe.
The campaign has been rightly launched during a year that will be a crucial one for the fight against poverty in the world: the annual G8 Summit in July (Scotland), with Africa as one of its priority items on the agenda; the UN High Level Plenary Meeting in September (New York), with a major review of the UN Millennium Declaration's implementation and of MDGs progress; the WTO Ministerial Conference in December 2005, a potentially decisive step in getting the Doha Development Round back on track.
Ta tri ključna mednarodna srečanja ponazarjajo pomen, ki ga ima leto 2005 za boj proti revščini.
These three major international meetings illustrate the importance of 2005 for the fight against poverty.
Kako bo predsedstvo EU glede na tri sporočila, ki jih je Komisija predstavila aprila („paket RCNT“) in v luči sklepov z zasedanja Evropskega sveta 16.-17. junija, na katerem so se države članice zavezale k cilju neposredne uradne razvojne pomoči (URP) za leto 2010 (0,51% BND za stare države članice in 0,17% za nove države članice), zagotovilo nadzor in spremljanje izvajanja teh zavez?
Following the three communications presented by the Commission in April (the ‘MDGs package’), and in the light of the 16-17 June European Council conclusions, where Member States committed themselves to an intermediate ODA target for 2010 (0.51% of GNI for ‘old’ Member States and 0.17% of GNI for ‘new’ Member States), how will the EU Presidency ensure the monitoring and follow-up of these commitments?
S katerimi konkretnimi ukrepi bo poskrbelo za izvajanje sklepov Sveta, sprejetih novembra 2004, o uskladitvi pravil in postopkov ter za uresničitev predlogov Komisije za povečanje usklajevanja in dopolnjevanja?
What concrete steps will the Presidency take in order to implement the Council Conclusions of November 2004 concerning harmonisation of rules and procedures and to implement the proposals made by the Commission to increase coordination and complementarity?
Razprava o sprostitvi vezave pomoči je, kar zadeva pomoč EU v okviru upravljanja ES, zelo napredovala.
The debate on untying aid is well advanced as far as EU assistance managed by the EC is concerned.
Kaj predsedstvo meni o tem, da bi URP upravljale nacionalne razvojne agencije?
But what about ODA managed by national development agencies?
S katerimi konkretnimi ukrepi bo zagotovilo, da bo sprostitev vezave pomoči sprejeta kot načelo v vseh državah članicah EU?
What concrete steps will the Presidency take to ensure that the untying of aid as a principle is adopted by all EU Member States?
Kakšno stališče bo predsedstvo EU, ki sedaj predseduje tudi G8, zavzelo o odpisu dolga?
What position on debt relief will the EU Presidency, now also chairing the G8, defend?
Katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti v zvezi z Mednarodnim finančnim skladom in drugimi inovativni viri financiranja razvoja?
What steps will the Presidency take concerning the International Financial Facility and other innovative sources of financing for development?
Ali bo spodbudilo Komisijo, da predlog za dodelitev prednosti Afriki poda v konkretnih odstotkih in ciljih URP?
Will the Presidency encourage the Commission to translate the proposed focus on Africa into concrete ODA percentages and targets?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0072/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0072/05
Zadeva: Svetovni poziv k ukrepanju proti revščini: Izkoreninimo revščino
Subject: Global Call to Action Against Poverty: Making Poverty History
Kampanjo "Svetovni poziv k ukrepanju proti revščini" je januarja 2005 ob otvoritvi svetovnega socialnega foruma sprožil brazilski predsednik Lula.
The campaign Global Call to Action Against Poverty was launched by President Lula of Brazil at the opening of the World Social Forum in January 2005.
Njene cilje lahko povzamemo v treh točkah: povečanje količine in kakovosti pomoči; odpis dolgov in pravična trgovina.
The campaign objectives can be summarised in three points: increase in the quantity and quality of aid; debt cancellation; fair trade.
Kampanja se je začela prav v letu, ki bo za boj proti revščini v svetu odločilno: julija bo potekal letni vrh G8 (Škotska), na katerem bo Afrika ena od prednostnih točk na dnevnem redu; septembra bo plenarno zasedanje ZN na visoki ravni (New York) z obsežnim pregledom izvajanja Deklaracije tisočletja ZN in napredka pri doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja (RCNT); ministrska konferenca STO v decembru 2005 pa bo morebiti odločilen korak pri ponovnem zagonu pogajanj o razvojni agendi iz Dohe.
The campaign has been rightly launched during a year that will be a crucial one for the fight against poverty in the world: the annual G8 Summit in July (Scotland), with Africa as one of its priority items on the agenda; the UN High Level Plenary Meeting in September (New York), with a major review of the UN Millennium Declaration's implementation and of MDGs progress; the WTO Ministerial Conference in December 2005, a potentially decisive step in getting the Doha Development Round back on track.
Da bi utrli pot za prispevek EU k zgoraj omenjenim srečanjem, je Komisija aprila sprejela tri sporočila (paket RCNT), v katerih je predlagala konkretne ukrepe za zvišanje obsega razvojne pomoči in pospešitev reform, s katerimi se bo izboljšala kakovost pomoči, povečala skladnost politik in zagotovilo, da bo v razvojnem sodelovanja Afrika postala prednostna.
In order to pave the way for the EU contribution to the aforementioned international meetings, the Commission duly adopted in April three communications (the ‘MDGs package’) proposing concrete measures to increase ODA levels and to speed up reforms that will improve the quality of aid, increase policy coherence, and ensure that Africa is a priority for development cooperation.
Kako Komisija predhodno presoja odziv držav članic EU na paket ukrepov RCNT?
What is the preliminary assessment of the Commission concerning the response by EU Member States on the MDGs package?
Posebej, kako Komisija namerava izboljšati skladnost politik preko krepitve mehanizma presoje vplivov (razvitega v letu 2000)?
In particular, the Commission intends to improve policy coherence by reinforcing the impact assessment mechanism (developed in 2000).
Kaj natančno to vključuje?
What does this imply exactly?
Bo Komisija sledila vzoru Švedske, v kateri vsaka vladna pobuda vsebuje presojo razvojnih vplivov?
Will the Commission follow the Swedish example, where every initiative adopted by the Government includes a development impact assessment?
Bo Komisija izvedla pobudo in predlagala uvedbo razvojnega polja v sporazum STO o kmetijstvu?
Will the Commission implement the suggestion of proposing the introduction of a development box in the WTO Agreement on Agriculture ?
Bo Komisija predlagano osredotočenje na Afriko udejanjila v obliki otipljivih odstotkov in ciljev?
Will the Commission translate the proposed focus on Africa into concrete percentages and targets ?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0073/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0073/05
Zadeva: Pravila o poreklu blaga v preferencialnih trgovinskih režimih ( KOM(2005)0100 končno)
Subject: Rules of origin in preferential trade arrangements ( COM(2005)0100 final)
Sporočilo o pravilih o poreklu blaga v preferencialnih trgovinskih režimih ( KOM(2005)0100 končno) predstavlja strategijo Komisije za vzpostavitev novih, poenostavljenih pravil o poreklu blaga za preferencialne trgovinske režime EU s tretjimi državami.
The Communication on rules of origin in preferential trade arrangements ( COM(2005)0100 final) sets out the Commission's strategy to establish new, simplified rules of origin for the EU's preferential trade arrangements with third countries.
Sporočilo opredeljuje naslednja cilja reforme:
The Communication defines the following objectives for reform:
poenostaviti in ublažiti pravila o poreklu blaga z uporabo enega samega merila, ki bo temeljilo na določenem pragu dodane vrednosti, in z okrepitvijo regionalne kumulacije,
simplify and relax rules of origin by applying a single criterion based on a certain threshold of value added and by enhancing regional cumulation;
izboljšati upoštevanje novih pravil med državami upravičenkami.
improve beneficiary countries' compliance with the new rules.
Parlament želi dodatne informacije o stališčih Sveta do sporočila Komisije:
Parliament wishes to seek further information on the Council's views of the Commission's Communication:
Kdaj bo Odbor za carinski zakonik Sveta razpravljal o Komisijinih načrtih za reformo pravil o poreklu blaga v dogovorih o preferencialnih trgovinskih režimih?
When will the Council's Customs Code Committee discuss the Commission's reform plans for rules of origin in preferential trade arrangements?
Katere vidike sporočila Komisija želi Svet spremeniti?
What aspects of the Commission's Communication does Council wish to amend?
Je Svet pripravljen Parlamentu posredovati tiste osnutke besedil, ki so jih države članice pripravile glede reforme pravil o poreklu blaga v dogovorih o preferencialnih trgovinskih režimih?
Would Council be prepared to circulate to Parliament those draft texts that Member States have prepared on reforming rules of origin in preferential trade arrangements?
Svet še ni sprejel Uredbe o splošnem sistemu preferencialov (GSP) za obdobje 2005-2008, v katerem bi bili izdelki iz držav v razvoju, vključno s tistimi, ki jih je prizadel azijski cunami, obravnavani pod bolj ugodnimi pogoji.
Council has not yet approved the regulation on GSP for 2005-2008, which would offer more favourable preferential treatment to eligible products from developing countries, including countries struck by the Asian tsunami.
Če se začetek veljavnosti nove Uredbe ponovno odloži, ES tvega, da bo obtožena nespoštovanja svojih obveznosti v okviru STO.
If the entry into force of the new regulation is further delayed, the EC risks being accused of failing to comply with its WTO obligations.
Kdaj naj bi po pričakovanjih Sveta začela veljati nova Uredba?
When does Council envisage the new regulation entering into force?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0074/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0074/05
Parlament želi dodatne informacije v zvezi z naslednjimi vidiki tega sporočila:
Parliament wishes to seek further information on the following aspects of this Communication:
Poenostavitev bo, glede na sporočilo, temeljila na "zanesljivih ekonomskih analizah" in "simulaciji".
According to the Communication, the simplification will be based on 'sound economic analysis' and 'simulation' exercises.
Ali lahko Komisija te analize posreduje Parlamentu in obrazloži svoj načrt in predvidevanja v zvezi s simulacijami?
Can the Commission share these analyses with Parliament and explain its scenarios and assumptions for the simulation exercise?
Ali bo Komisija zaprosila Parlament za sodelovanje pri določanju pragovnih vrednosti (v odstotkih) za proizvode, sektorje, geografske regije in skupine držav?
Will the Commission request Parliament's input in the definition of percentage thresholds for products, sectors, geographical regions, and country groupings?
Pri izvozu iz držav v razvoju pravila EU o poreklu blaga zaradi prevelikih omejitev in zapletenih upravnih postopkov pogosto niso izpolnjena.
Exports from developing countries often fail to meet the EU's rules of origin due to excessive constraints and complex administrative procedures.
Evropski parlament vztraja, da je treba ublažiti zahteve (minimalne operacije ali postopki) za podelitev porekla blagu.
The European Parliament has insisted on the need to relax the requirements (minimum operations or processes) to confer origin on a product.
V zvezi s predlogom za olajšanje regionalne kumulacije, katera merila namerava Komisija uporabiti za določitev praga, s katerim bo zagotovila dejansko ublažitev pravil o poreklu za države v razvoju?
Further to the proposal to facilitate regional cumulation, what criteria is the Commission going to use in order to set a threshold that guarantees an actual relaxation of rules of origin for developing countries?
Večji del preferencialnega uvoza je geografsko koncentriran.
The majority of preferential imports are geographically concentrated.
Od 177 držav upravičenk splošnega sistema preferencialov predstavlja šest največjih dobaviteljev več kot polovico, Kitajska pa eno tretjino preferencialnega uvoza.
Of the 177 beneficiary countries of the GSP, the top six suppliers account for over half, and China for one-third, of total preferential imports.
Ali Komisija razmišlja o možnosti uvedbe medregionalne kumulacije za ves uvoz iz držav v razvoju v okviru istega preferencialnega trgovinskega režima?
Has the Commission considered the possibility of introducing cross-regional cumulation for all developing-country imports covered by the same preferential trade arrangement?
Ali je Komisija preučila morebitno vlogo medregionalne kumulacije pri okrepitvi regionalne integracije kot tudi medregionalnih trgovinskih povezav med skladnimi skupinami držav v razvoju?
Has the Commission studied the possible role of cross-regional cumulation in enhancing regional integration, as well as inter-regional trade ties among coherent developing-country groupings?
Katere regije bodo najverjetneje dodane tistim, ki že imajo možnost regionalne kumulacije v splošnem sistemu preferencialov?
What regions are most likely to be added to those that currently enjoy regional cumulation in the GSP?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0075/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0075/05
Zadeva: Seznami ameriških oblasti z imeni potnikov, ki se ne smejo vkrcati na letalo/PNR
Subject: No-fly lists of US authorities/PNR
Bo Komisija, glede na zadnje incidente pri uporabi seznamov ameriške administracije z imeni nezaželenih potnikov na letalih, pozvala ameriške oblasti, naj Komisiji in ustreznim nacionalnim organom držav članic posredujejo vse informacije o državljanih EU, ki so zaradi varnosti v prometu in učinkovite zaščite pred terorističnimi napadi vključeni na seznam?
With regard to the latest incidents in the application of the US administration's no-fly lists, will the Commission urge the US authorities to make available to the Commission and relevant national authorities of the Member States any information about EU citizens who have been listed for reasons of traffic security and effective protection from terrorist attacks?
Bo Komisija preučila, ali to omogoča ZDA, da (npr. z uporabo podatkov APIS) obidejo sporazum o podatkih iz evidence imen letalskih potnikov (PNR)?
Will the Commission consider whether this constitutes a possible circumvention (for example by using APIS data) by the US of the PNR agreement?
Ali Komisija ve, po katerem sistemu in kateri podatki o potnikih so se prenesli iz letalske družbe KLM v Mehiko in na kakšni osnovi je Mehika potem te podatke predala ameriškim oblastem?
Does the Commission know through what system and what passenger data were transferred from KLM to Mexico and on what basis Mexico then transferred this data to the US authorities?
Lahko Komisija zagotovi, da ameriške oblasti podatkov o potnikih na letalu KLM niso dobile neposredno iz evropskih računalniških sistemov rezervacij?
Can the Commission guarantee that the information on the passengers on board the KLM flight was not directly retrieved by US authorities from the European CRS's (computerised reservation systems)?
Katera pravna sredstva imajo državljani na voljo v primeru zlorabe podatkov, ki se prenesejo v okviru APIS?
What means of legal redress do citizens have in the event of abuse of data transferred under APIS?
Ali ta sredstva zadostujejo glede na Direktivo 95/46/ES ?
Are such means considered adequate in the light of Directive 95/46/EC ?
Kdaj namerava Komisija predstaviti skupni letni pregled?
When does the Commission intend to come forward with the Annual Joint Review?
UL L 281, 23.11.1995, str.
OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0076/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0076/05
in Baroness
and Baroness
Zadeva: Stanje človekovih pravic na Kosovu
Subject: The human rights situation of the Roma in Kosovo