natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Urad visokega komisarja OZN za begunce je 1. avgusta 2011 poročal, da je v taboriščih v puščavi še vedno 4425 oseb.
On 1 August 2011, UNHCR reported that 4 425 persons of concern to them were still present in the desert camps on the Tunisian-Libyan border.
Edina trajna rešitev zanje bi bila preselitev v tretje države.
For these refugees, the only lasting solution is resettlement to third countries.
Po poročanju članov delegacije odbora LIBE, ki se je v Tuniziji mudila od 13. do 16. julija 2011, se položaj beguncev v teh taboriščih iz dneva v dan slabša.
As stated by the members of the 13-16 July 2011 EP LIBE delegation to Tunisia, the situation of refugees in the camps is worsening day by day.
Živijo v izredno hudih razmerah, predvsem zaradi skrajne vročine, puščavskih viharjev in omejenega dostopa do čiste vode, neustreznih sanitarnih razmer in higiene.
They face extremely harsh conditions, above all owing to the extreme heat, sandstorms and limited access to clean water, adequate sanitation and hygiene facilities.
Člane delegacije je osupnil pomanjkljiv odziv držav članic EU glede preselitve teh ljudi, povsem v nasprotju z ravnanjem Kanade, ZDA in Norveške.
Members of the delegation were struck by the weak response given by EU Member States in terms of resettlement, compared to the efforts undertaken by countries like Canada, the United States and Norway.
Visoka predstavnica Catherine Ashton je 30. avgusta 2011 sporočila, da so se dotlej za to zavezale samo nekatere države članice: Irska (24), Španija (50), Portugalska (19), Švedska (200), Belgija (25), Finska (70) in Nizozemska (20).
As stated by High Representative Ashton on 30 August 2011, only the following pledges for resettlement had been made by that time by Member States: Ireland (24), Spain (50), Portugal (19), Sweden (200), Belgium (25), Finland (70) and the Netherlands (20).
Ravno nasprotno pa se je Norveška obvezala, da bo sprejela 310 beguncev, ker je do julija 2011 tudi storila.
In stark contrast, Norway pledged to resettle 310 refugees, a goal which it had achieved by July 2011.
Ali lahko Komisija obvesti Parlament, kakšno je zdaj stanje v razpravah s Svetom in državami članicami o načrtih, da bi uradu visokega komisarja OZN za begunce pomagali pri preselitvi preostalih beguncev iz Tunizije, koliko novih oseb se bodo države članice zavezale naseliti in kako je s sprejemanjem tistih beguncev, katerih primeri so bili že sprejeti?
Can the Commission inform Parliament about the state of play on the discussions with the Council and the Member States on the plan to assist the UNHCR in the resettlement of the remaining refugees in Tunisia, how many new places will be pledged by the Member States and at which stage is the reception of those refugees whose cases have already been accepted?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000205/2011
Question for oral answer O-000205/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Evropska podpora beguncem v Tuniziji
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: EU support to refugees in Tunisia
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000206/2011
Question for oral answer O-000206/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Evropska podpora beguncem v Tuniziji
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: EU support to refuges in Tunisia
Velika večina je delavcev migrantov v tranzitu, ki se jim je zaradi mednarodnih prizadevanj Mednarodne organizacije za migracije v veliki meri uspelo vrniti domov.
The vast majority of those arriving in Tunisia have been migrant workers in transit and, thanks to a concerted international effort spearheaded by the IOM, most migrants have been able to return home.
Ogromno število ljudi, ki prihaja iz držav v konfliktih ali ki bežijo pred preganjanjem, ostaja v begunskih taboriščih.
However, a substantial number of people from conflict-stricken countries and/or fleeing persecution remain in the refugee camps.
Po poročanju članov delegacije odbora LIBE v Tuniziji od 13. do 16. julija 2011 se položaj beguncev v teh taboriščih iz dneva v dan slabša.
As stated by the members of the 13-16 July 2011 EP LIBE delegation to Tunisia, the situation of refugees in the camps is worsening day by day.
Živijo v izredno hudih razmerah, predvsem zaradi skrajne vročine, puščavskih viharjev in omejenega dostopa do čiste vode, ustreznih sanitarnih razmer in higiene.
They face extremely harsh conditions, above all owing to the extreme heat, sandstorms and limited access to clean water, adequate sanitation and hygiene facilities.
Člani delegacije so bili pretreseni zaradi pomanjkljivega odziva držav članic EU glede preselitve teh ljudi, povsem drugače, kot so ravnale Kanada, ZDA in Norveška.
Members of the delegation were struck by the weak response given by EU Member States in terms of resettlement, compared to the efforts undertaken by countries like Canada, the United States and Norway.
Ali lahko Komisija obvesti Parlament, kakšno je zdaj stanje v razpravah s Svetom in državami članicami o načrtih, da bi uradu visokega komisarja OZN pomagali pri preselitvi preostalih beguncev iz Tunizije, za koliko novih oseb se bodo države članice zavezale in kako je s sprejemanjem tistih beguncev, katerih primeri so bili že sprejeti?
Can the Commission inform Parliament about the state of play on the discussions with the Council and the Member States on the plan to assist the UNHCR in the resettlement of the remaining refugees in Tunisia, how many new places will be pledged by the Member States and at which stage is the reception of those refugees whose cases have already been accepted?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000207/2011
Question for oral answer O-000207/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Najnovejše dogajanje v vzhodnem Sredozemlju
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Latest developments in the East Mediterranean region
V zadnjih mesecih smo priča vse večjim napetostim v vzhodnem Sredozemlju.
In recent months we have been witnessing mounting tension in the Eastern Mediterranean region.
Turško-izraelski odnosi so se zaostrili.
Turkish-Israeli relations have been aggravated.
Turčija je znižala raven odnosov z Izraelom, saj je prekinila vojaške in trgovinske odnose med državama ter s svojega ozemlja izgnala izraelskega veleposlanika, njegovega namestnika in druge visoke izraelske diplomate; s tem se je odzvala na zavrnitev Izraela, da bi se opravičil ali plačal odškodnino za devet turških aktivistov, ki so jih ustrelili izraelski komandosi na ladji v humanitarnem konvoju, ki je skušal prebiti izraelsko pomorsko blokado Gaze leta 2010.
Turkey has downgraded relations with Israel by suspending both military and commercial relations between the two countries and expelling Israel’s ambassador, his deputy and other senior Israeli diplomats from its territory as a reaction to Israel’s refusal to apologize or pay compensation for the nine Turkish activists who were shot dead by Israeli commandos on an aid convoy that was trying to bust Israel’s sea blockade of Gaza in 2010.
Dodaten dejavnik napetosti v regiji je tudi dejstvo, da Turčija ne priznava, da lahko država članica EU izvaja svoje zakonite suverene pravice, kot določa konvencija Združenih narodov o pomorskem pravu, ki je del pravnega reda Unije.
An additional factor in the tension in the region is the fact that Turkey refuses to accept that an EU Member State can exercise its lawful sovereign rights as provided for in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which is part of the acquis communautaire.
Vse države članice Evropske unije, Unija sama ter vse države kandidatke razen ene so pogodbenice te konvencije.
All EU Member States, the EU itself and all candidate countries but one are contracting parties thereto.
Dodaten razlog za zaskrbljenost je dejstvo, da omenjeno nepriznavanje spremljajo uradne izjave za tisk in grožnje z ostrimi odgovori, med katerimi ni izključen vojaški, če bi te pravice uveljavljali, torej če bi Republika Ciper v partnerstvu z mednarodnimi izvajalci iskala nafto in zemeljski plin na območju svoje izključne ekonomske cone.
What adds to the concerns is the fact that the said refusal is accompanied by official press statements and declarations of threats involving forceful reactions – a military one not excluded – should such rights be exercised; that is to say, if the Republic of Cyprus carries out searches for oil and natural gas within its Exclusive Economic Zone, in partnership with international contractors.
Med drugim ta projekt prispeva k povečanju energetske varnosti Evropske unije in večji raznolikosti v preskrbi z energijo.
Inter alia, this project is a contribution to the strengthening of the EU’s energy security and differentiation of supply.
Ob upoštevanju pomembne vloge Evropske unije v regiji, ki je odločilnega pomena za regionalno in mednarodno varnost, se na Komisijo naslovijo ta vprašanja:
Having regard to the EU’s important role in a region so critical to regional and international security, the Commission is asked the following questions:
- Ali je Komisija zaskrbljena zaradi razmer v vzhodnem Sredozemlju?
- Is it concerned by the situation in the East Mediterranean region?
Kako jih ocenjuje Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje?
What is the EEAS assessment?
Kakšni so njeni sklepi?
What are the conclusions it has come to?
- Katere diplomatske ukrepe namerava sprejeti Evropska unija na podlagi spoštovanja mednarodnega prava, zlasti konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem pravu, pa tudi načela solidarnosti, določenega v Lizbonski pogodbi?
- What diplomatic action does the EU intend to take on the basis of compliance with International Law, and UNCLOS in particular, as well as on that of the principle of solidarity as provided for in the Lisbon Treaty?
- Kako se bo odzvala Evropska unija na uradne izjave Turčije, da bo zamrznila stike z Evropsko unijo med ciprskim predsedovanjem?
- What is the EU reaction to Turkey’s official statements on freezing contacts with the EU during Cyprus’s Presidency?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000208/2011
Question for oral answer O-000208/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Turške grožnje Republiki Ciper v zvezi z njenim izključnim ekonomskim območjem
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Turkish threats against the Republic of Cyprus on its Exclusive Economic Zone
Republika Ciper je že davno začela uradne raziskave nahajališč ogljikovodikov na svojem izključnem ekonomskem območju.
Long ago the Republic of Cyprus began an official exploration for hydrocarbons within its Exclusive Economic Zone.
Turčija tega zakonitega dejstva ni nikoli sprejela:
Turkey has never accepted this lawful situation:
- 13. novembra 2008 so turške bojne ladje preganjale raziskovalno plovilo v lasti norveške družbe, ki je plulo pod panamsko zastavo na izključnem ekonomskem območju Republike Ciper (27 navtičnih milj od severne obale tega otoka) ter zanjo izvajalo raziskave;
- a research vessel belonging to a Norwegian company, sailing under a Panamanian flag, which was conducting research in Cyprus’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)(27 nautical miles off the island’s north coast) on behalf of the Republic of Cyprus was harassed by Turkish warships on 13 November 2008;
- ob treh priložnostih, to je 19., 21. in 24. novembra 2008, so turške bojne ladje preganjale raziskovalna plovila, ki so na izključnem ekonomskem območju Republike Ciper zanjo izvajale oceanografske raziskave.
- on three other occasions, on 19, 21 and 24 November 2008, Turkish warships harassed research vessels which were conducting oceanographic research in Cyprus’s EEZ on behalf of the Republic of Cyprus.
Glede na to, da so se začela vrtanja v izključnem ekonomskem območju Republike Ciper, je Turčija odprto in večkrat grozila na vseh najvišjih možnih vladnih ravneh, da bo odposlala bojne ladje in sklenila „sporazum“ z nepriznano „Turško republiko Severni Ciper“ o izkoriščanju izključnega ekonomskega območja Republike Ciper, namesto da bi se pogajala s samo Republiko Ciper.
Now Turkey, in the light of the drilling process that has begun in the EEZ of the Republic of Cyprus, has threatened openly and repeatedly at the highest possible governmental level to dispatch warships, conclude an ‘agreement’ with the non-recognised ‘TRNC’ on exploring the EEZ of the Republic of Cyprus instead of doing so with the Republic of Cyprus per se.
Turška vlada je tako s svojimi nasilnimi dejavnostmi prignala do kriznih razmer, kar zadeva Republiko Ciper (ki je država članica EU) ter mir in stabilnost v Sredozemskem morju.
Thus the Turkish Government is bringing to a head its aggressive activities vis-à-vis both the Republic of Cyprus (the latter being an EU Member State) and peace and stability in the Mediterranean Sea.
Obenem s temi grožnjami ogroža mirovni proces pri reševanju ciprskega vprašanja.
At the same time such threats endanger the peace process on a resolution of the Cyprus problem.
Kot je znano, je Evropska unija (10. decembra 1998) ratificirala Konvencijo Združenih narodov o pomorskem pravu, ki je tako postala sestavni del pravnega reda Skupnosti.
As you know ‘The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’ was ratified by the European Union (10 December 1998) and consequently constitutes part of the acquis communautaire.
Konvencija o pomorskem pravu je kot taka dejansko del pravnega reda Skupnosti, ki ga mora Turčija, tako kot vse druge države pristopnice k EU, sprejeti in izvajati.
As such, the Convention on the Law of the Sea is indeed part of the Community acquis, which Turkey along with all other countries interested in acceding to the EU is expected to adopt and enforce.
Ker turška vlada ogroža suverene pravice države članice in krši pravo Skupnosti s tem, ko do skrajnosti zaostruje dejanske ukrepe, ki ogrožajo mirovni proces in stabilnost v Sredozemskem morju, ali lahko Komisija odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Since the Turkish Government is jeopardising the sovereign rights of a Member State and violating Community law in bringing to a climax its de facto acts which are endangering the peace process and jeopardising stability in the Mediterranean Sea, the Commission is asked the following questions:
Kakšno stališče ima do sedanjih groženj državi članici?
What is its view regarding the current threats against a Member State?
Kako namerava ukrepati glede na te turške grožnje?
What are its intentions vis-à-vis these Turkish threats?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000209/2011
Question for oral answer O-000209/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Evropska podpora beguncem v Tuniziji
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: EU support to refugees in Tunisia
Velika večina je delavcev migrantov v tranzitu, ki se jim je zaradi mednarodnih prizadevanj pod vodstvom Mednarodne organizacije za migracije v veliki meri uspelo vrniti domov.
The vast majority of those arriving in Tunisia have been migrant workers in transit and, thanks to a concerted international effort spearheaded by the IOM, most migrants have been able to return home.
Ravno nasprotno pa se je Norveška obvezala, da bo sprejela 310 beguncev, kar je do julija 2011 tudi storila.
In stark contrast, Norway pledged to resettle 310 refugees, a goal which it had achieved by July 2011.
Ali lahko Komisija obvesti Parlament, kakšno je zdaj stanje v razpravah s Svetom in državami članicami o načrtih, da bi uradu visokega komisarja OZN za begunce pomagali pri preselitvi preostalih beguncev iz Tunizije, koliko novih oseb se bodo države članice zavezale naseliti in kako je s sprejemanjem tistih beguncev, katerih zadeve so bile že odobrene?
Can the Commission inform Parliament about the state of play on the discussions with the Council and the Member States on the plan to assist the UNHCR in the resettlement of the remaining refugees in Tunisia, how many new places will be pledged by the Member States and at which stage is the reception of those refugees whose cases have already been accepted?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000210/2011
Question for oral answer O-000210/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Direktiva o hrambi podatkov
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Data Retention Directive
Komisija v ocenjevalnem poročilu o direktivi o hrambi podatkov (Direktiva 2006/24/ES), ki ga je predložila 18. aprila 2011, ugotavlja, da so v zakonodaji za prenos na področju omejitve namena, dostopa do podatkov, obdobij hrambe, varovanja in varnosti podatkov ter statistike velike razlike, da tri države članice kršijo direktivo, ker so zakonodajo za prenos razveljavila njihova ustavna sodišča, in da je proti tem državam uveden ali jim grozi sodni postopek, podoben postopek pa ni bil predlagan za države, za katere je Komisija ugotovila, da so jo prenesle slabo, tako da državljanom ni zagotovljeno ustrezno varstvo temeljnih pravic.
The Commission’s evaluation report on the Data Retention Directive (Directive 2006/24/EC) presented on 18 April 2011 concludes there are significant differences between transposing legislation in the areas of purpose limitation, access to data, periods of retention, data protection and data security and statistics, Three Member States have been in breach of the directive since their transposing legislation was annulled by their respective constitutional courts; while these three countries are the subject of, or have been threatened with, legal action, no similar action has been proposed regarding countries that are identified by the Commission as having badly transposed in ways which fail to give adequate protection to citizens’ fundamental rights;
V direktivi ni popolnoma usklajen pristop na področju hrambe podatkov in niso ustvarjeni enotni pogoji delovanja za ponudnike.
The Directive has not fully harmonised the approach to data retention and has not created a level playing-field for operators.
Zakaj Komisija še vedno namerava proti nekaterim državam članicam začeti postopek zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti, če meni, da je treba direktivo revidirati, posledično pa tudi nacionalne zakonodaje za prenos?
Why does the Commission still intend to initiate infringement proceedings against certain Member States, if the Commission itself sees the necessity to revise the directive and consequently any national transposing legislation?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000211/2011
Question for oral answer O-000211/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Varnostni skenerji
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Security scanners
Komisija in Parlament sta dosegla dogovor o uporabi telesnih skenerjev za pregledovanje potnikov na letališčih v EU kot dodaten varnostni ukrep v boju proti terorizmu.
The Commission and Parliament have agreed on the inclusion of body scanners for screening passengers at EU airports as an additional security measure in the fight against terrorism.
Tehnologija, ki upošteva pomisleke v zvezi z zdravjem ter varstvom zasebnosti in podatkov pregledanih potnikov, je že na voljo, v izvedbenih določbah pa ni posebej poudarjeno, da morajo biti slike v obliki orisa, v kar je privolil Parlament v odstavku 27 svoje resolucije P7_TA(2011)0329 , sprejete v juliju 2011.
Technology is already available which addresses the health, privacy and data protection concerns of screened passengers; however, the implementing measures do not specify that body images must be in the form of a stick-figure, as agreed by Parliament in Paragraph 27 of its report P7_TA(2011)0329 adopted in July 2011.
Predlog lahko resno poseže v pravico do zasebnosti in varstva podatkov državljanov EU.
This proposal may therefore have a serious impact on the right of EU citizens to privacy and data protection.
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo določbe o telesnih slikah v celoti v skladu s temeljnima pravicama do zasebnosti in varstva podatkov?
How is the Commission going to make sure the provisions on body images ensure that fundamental rights to privacy and data protection are fully respected?
Kako bo zaščitena potnikova identiteta?
How will passengers’ identity be protected?
Kako bo zagotovljeno varstvo osebnih podatkov, pridobljenih z uporabo telesnih skenerjev?
How will the security of personal data recorded by the body scanners be guaranteed?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da so varnostni skenerji koristni kot sestavni del učinkovitejših varnostnih postopkov v celotni EU, da pa je treba okrepiti čezmejno sodelovanje obveščevalnih služb, protiteroristične ukrepe in uporabo centraliziranega rezervacijskega sistema ter profiliranje potnikov za prepoznavanje potencialnih teroristov?
Does the Commission also share the view that security scanners are a useful part of more effective security procedures across the EU, but that cross-border intelligence, counter-terrorism measures and the use of central reservation systems and passenger profiling to identify potential terrorists need to be strengthened?
Kaj meni Komisija o stališču Parlamenta, izraženega v odstavku 56 že omenjenega poročila iz julija 2011, da je treba zavezujoče ukrepe na področju letalske varnosti, ki tako globoko posegajo v temeljne človekove pravice, sprejeti z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom?
What is the Commission’s view on Parliament’s position, as expressed in Paragraph 56 of its aforementioned July 2011 report, that binding measures for the aviation security sector which have such a great impact on people’s fundamental rights must be adopted via the ordinary legislative procedure?
To bi Parlamentu omogočilo, da bi bil še nadalje aktivno vključen v sprejemanje sklepov na tem področju, kar zahteva primerno stopnjo preglednosti.
This would allow Parliament to remain actively involved in decisions of this nature, which require an appropriate level of transparency.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000212/2011
Question for oral answer O-000212/2011
v imenu Odbora za razvoj Zadeva: Politika EU o biomasi ter njenem učinku na razvoj
on behalf of the Committee on Development Subject: EU biomass policy and its impact on development
Svet Evropske unije je aprila 2009 sprejel direktivo o vzpostavitvi skupnega okvira EU za spodbujanje uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov (Direktiva 2009/28/ES).
In April 2009, the Council of the European Union adopted a directive establishing a common EU framework for the promotion of energy from renewable sources (Directive 2009/28/EC).
Namen tega zakonodajnega akta je do leta 2020 doseči 20-odstotni delež energije iz obnovljivih virov v končni porabi energije v EU ter 10-odstotni delež energije iz obnovljivih virov v porabi energije za promet v vsaki državi članici;
The aim of this legislative act is to achieve by 2020 a 20% share of energy from renewable sources in the EU's final consumption of energy and a 10% share of energy from renewable sources in each Member State's transport energy consumption.
Cilj te direktive je močan porast proizvodnje in uporabe biomase za energijo (določena je celo zahteva o podvojitvi deleža biomase do leta 2020), vendar ne vsebuje trdnega okvira, ki bi zagotovil trajnostno proizvodnjo in uporabo biomase za energijo.
While the Directive seeks a significant increase in the production and use of biomass for energy – with a requirement to double its share by 2020 – there is no strong framework in place to ensure the sustainable production and use of biomass for energy.
Poleg tega ima lesna biomasa lahko škodljive posledice za gozdove v državah v razvoju, saj bi lahko njena uporaba privedla do preobrazbe pragozdov, mokrišč itd. v plantaže surovin za biogorivo.
In addition to this, woody biomass has a potential detrimental effect on forests in developing countries since it might entail the conversion of natural forests, wetlands, etc. to biofuel feedstock plantations.
S katerimi ukrepi namerava Svet zagotoviti, da bo biomasa, uporabljena za energijo, trajnostno pridelana in skladna s trajnostnim upravljanjem gozdov, tako v EU kot zunaj nje?
What are the measures that the Council intends to take to ensure that biomass used for energy is sustainable and is consistent with sustainable management of forests, both within and outside the EU?