natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bistvenega pomena je, da se javnost s temi merili seznani in obvesti na jasen in pregleden način.
It is of the utmost importance that these criteria be clearly and transparently communicated and announced to the public.
Šele takrat lahko Komisija zagotovi pregleden in prepoznaven proces za prihodnje države članice, ki bodo šle skozi ta postopek.
Only then the Commission can secure a plain and visible process for future Member States which will go through the procedure.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000321/2011
Question for oral answer O-000321/2011
v imenu Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov Zadeva: Pogajanja med EU in ZDA o dveh sporazumih na področju varnosti proizvodov in varstva potrošnikov
on behalf of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Subject: Negotiations between the EU and the US on two agreements in the field of product safety and consumer protection
Evropska komisija se na podlagi mandata, ki ji ga je podelil Svet 20. novembra 2009, pogaja o dveh sporazumih z ZDA o sodelovanju in izmenjavi informacij na področju varnosti potrošniških izdelkov ter o sodelovanju pri izvajanju zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov.
Based on a mandate given in the Council on 20 November 2009, the Commission is currently negotiating two agreements with the US on cooperation and information exchange on consumer product safety and cooperation on enforcement of consumer protection laws.
Pogajanja vodi generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov.
DG SANCO is leading both negotiations.
Pogajanja o prvem sporazumu potekajo s komisijo ZDA za varnost potrošniških izdelkov, njihov namen pa je izboljšati izmenjavo informacij o nevarnih proizvodih, poškodbah in korektivnih ukrepih v državah članicah EU in ZDA.
The first agreement is being negotiated with the US Consumer Product Safety Commission and aims to improve the exchange of information on dangerous products, injuries and corrective actions taken in both the EU Member States and the US.
Pogajanja o drugem sporazumu potekajo z zvezno komisijo ZDA za trgovino in so osredotočena na skupne izvedbene ukrepe ter izmenjavo uradnikov, statističnih podatkov in primerov najboljše prakse.
The second agreement is being negotiated with the US Federal Trade Commission and focuses on joint enforcement actions, exchange of officials and exchange of statistical information and sharing of best practices.
Ali bi lahko Komisija predstavila, kakšno je trenutno stanje pogajanj z Združenimi državami o sporazumih o sodelovanju na področju varnosti proizvodov in sodelovanju pri izvajanju zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov ter kakšni so izgledi za uspešen izid?
Could the Commission outline the current state of play with regard to the negotiations with the United States on the agreements on cooperation on product safety and on cooperation in the enforcement of consumer protection laws, and indicate the prospects for a successful outcome?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000322/2011
Question for oral answer O-000322/2011
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Program "Inteligentna energija - Evropa II" ter večletna finančna perspektiva
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: 'Intelligent energy - Europe II' programme and multiannual financial framework
Uspeh evropske energetske politike je odvisen od intenzivnih znanstvenih raziskav pri razvoju novih trajnostnih in konkurenčnih tehnologij ter hkrati od učinkovitejše uporabe obstoječih tehnologij.
The success of Europe’s energy policy depends both on active scientific research into the development of new competitive and sustainable technologies and on improving the use of existing technology.
Da bi spodbudila uporabo obstoječih trajnostnih energetskih rešitev ter odpravila vse netehnološke ovire na področju obnovljivih virov energije in energetske učinkovitosti (npr. pomanjkanje informacij, strokovnega znanja in finančnih sredstev na določenih področjih), je Evropska unija razvila večletni program „Inteligentna energija - Evropa II“, ki se trenutno izvaja.
In order to encourage the use of the current sustainable energy solutions and eliminate all non-technological barriers in the field of renewable energy sources and energy efficiency (e.g. lack of information, skills or funding for specific fields), the European Union has devised the currently running multiannual programme ‘Intelligent Energy - Europe II’.
Ta program, ki se osredotoča na ozaveščanje, krepitev zmogljivosti in kompetenc ter na podporo izvajanju politik, je korak v pravo smer in zato je pomembno, da mu uspe pritegniti veliko različnih javnih, zasebnih in nevladnih udeležencev, vključno z malimi in srednjimi podjetji.
This programme, which concentrates on awareness-raising, developing abilities and skills, and helping to implement policies, is a step in the right direction, and it is vital for it to succeed in attracting a wide variety of public, private and non-governmental operators, including SMEs.
Katere prednostne naloge, izboljšave in financiranje bo Komisija predlagala za program, ki bo nasledil sedanji program „Inteligentna energija - Evropa II“ po letu 2013, če upoštevamo dejstvo, da je treba v Evropi izvajati programe trajnostne energije?
In view of the need to pursue sustainable energy programmes in Europe, what priorities, improvements and funding does the Commission plan to propose for the successor programme to ‘Intelligent Energy - Europe II’ after 2013?
Katere ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bi zagotovila še dejavnejše sodelovanje malih in srednjih podjetij?
What measures does the Commission propose to take to secure even more active participation by SMEs?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti boljšo usklajenost in povezanost tega prihodnjega programa z drugimi pobudami Unije?
How does the Commission propose to ensure that this future programme is more compatible and better coordinated with other Community initiatives?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000323/2011
Question for oral answer O-000323/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Omejitve prostega pretoka delavcev
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Restrictions on free movement of workers
Od leta 2011 naprej mora država članica odločitev o podaljšanju ukrepov za še dve dodatni leti utemeljiti z dokazi o resnih motnjah delovanja na svojem trgu dela.
From 2011 onwards, in order for a Member State to decide to extend the measures for two more years, it must provide evidence of serious disturbances in its labour market.
Ali Komisija lahko oblikuje jasno definicijo “resnih motenj delovanja trga dela”?
Could the Commission provide a clear definition as to what the term ‘severe disturbances in labour markets’ implies?
Ali Komisija namerava analizirati in nadgraditi presojo vpliva glede delovnih in življenjskih pogojev regulirane in/ali nezakonite delovne sile iz Romunije in Bolgarije v preostalih državah članicah EU?
Does the Commission intend to analyse and further develop an impact assessment regarding the working and living conditions of the regulated and/or ‘irregular’ labour force originating from Romania and Bulgaria in the other EU Member States?
Danes je eden od glavnih virov socialnega dampinga to, da družbe, ki delujejo po mafijskih načelih, zlorabljajo direktivo o napotenih delavcih, in romunske in bolgarske delavce zaposlujejo predvsem zaradi njihovega šibkejšega položaja in jih potem izkoriščajo pod pretvezo te direktive.
One of the main sources of social dumping nowadays is abuse of the Posted Workers Directive by companies with mafia practices which mainly employ Romanian and Bulgarian workers because of their weaker position and then exploit them using that legal framework.
Ali glede na to Komisija namerava kaj storiti, da bi zaščitila te delavce in ustavila socialni damping na način, ki državam članicam ne bo dovoljeval, da bi te delavce same opredelile kot nezakonite, namesto da bi zakonsko prepovedala, da jih nekatera mafijska podjetja, ki delujejo na ravni EU, izkoriščajo?
With this in mind, does the Commission intend to do anything to protect these workers and stop social dumping in ways that do not allow Member States to make the workers themselves illegal rather than outlawing the exploitation of those workers by certain mafia companies operating at EU level?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000324/2011
Question for oral answer O-000324/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Tretji energetski sveženj in načelo dostopa tretje stranke
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Third Energy Package and the principle of third-party access (TPA)
Tretji sveženj za liberalizacijo na področju energetike zagotavlja podlago za konkurenčen energetski trg v Evropski uniji.
The third energy liberalisation package provides a basis for a competitive energy market in the EU.
Toda v zadnjem času predstavniki Ruske federacije in ruski monopolist Gazprom ponovno pozivajo k reformi načel tega svežnja, zlasti k razveljavitvi načela dostopa tretje stranke do infrastrukture za prenos plina.
Recently, however, representatives of the Russian Federation and the Russian monopolist Gazprom have been repeating an appeal for the principles of the third package to be reformed, particularly for the principle of ‘third-party access’ (TPA) to the gas transmission infrastructure to be repealed.
Tako mnenje je bilo v nekaterih prestolnicah držav članic EU sprejeto z razumevanjem.
These opinions have met with understanding in some EU Member States’ capitals.
Natančneje gledano gre za odpravo načela dostopa tretje stranke do plinovoda Južni tok.
Specifically, this involves withdrawal of the principle of third-party access to the South Stream pipeline.
V zvezi s kampanjo Ruske federacije proti določbam tretjega liberalizacijskega svežnja obstajajo namigi o predlogu sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Rusko federacijo, na podlagi katerega naj pravila omenjenega svežnja ne bi bila zavezujoča za ruske plinovode za izvoz.
With reference to the Russian Federation’s campaign against the provisions of the third liberalisation package, there have been reports of an agreement being proposed between the European Union and the Russian Federation, under which the aforementioned package’s rules would not be binding with regard to Russian gas export pipelines.
To bi bil mednarodni sporazum, ki bi presegal evropsko pravo.
This would be an international agreement above European law.
Posvetovanja o tej temi so bila zabeležena v protokolu o gospodarskih pogajanjih med Francijo in Rusijo iz novembra 2011.
The consultations on this topic were noted in the protocol of the economic negotiations between France and Russia dated November 2011.
Ali drži, da je bil Komisiji med pogovori EU in Rusije o energiji predstavljen osnutek sporazuma?
Is it true that the Commission was presented with a draft agreement during EU Russia energy talks?
Ali drži, da je osnutek sporazuma pripravila ruska vlada?
Is it true that the draft agreement was drawn up by the Russian Government?
Ali namerava Komisija spremeniti določbe tretjega svežnja o liberalizaciji na področju energetike?
Does the Commission intend to change the provisions of the third liberalisation package in the energy sector?
Ali namerava Komisija ugoditi zahtevam, da je treba Južni tok izvzeti iz pravil tretjega energetskega svežnja, vključno z načelom dostopa tretje stranke?
Is the Commission intending to accede to the demands for South Stream to be excluded from the rules of the third energy package, including the third-party access principle (TPA)?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000325/2011
Question for oral answer O-000325/2011
v imenu Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko Zadeva: Prihodnost programa GMES
on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Subject: Future of GMES
Komisija je 30. novembra sprejela sporočilo o evropskem programu za spremljanje Zemlje (GMES) in njegovih dejavnostih (od leta 2014 naprej).
On 30 November the Commission adopted a Communication on the European Earth monitoring programme (GMES) and its operations (from 2014 onwards).
Zakaj se je Komisija odločila sprejeti poročilo o prihodnosti programa GMES in ne predloga uredbe, kot je bilo najavljeno v delovnem programu Komisije za leto 2010?
Why did the Commission decide to adopt a Communication on the future of the GMES programme and not a proposal for a regulation, as announced in the Commission Work Programme 2010?
Zakaj je Komisija predlagala financiranje programa GMES izven večletnega finančnega okvira?
Why did the Commission propose to finance the GMES programme outside the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF)?
Kdaj bo Komisija predložila zakonodajni predlog za prihodnje financiranje in upravljanje programa GMES, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, da veljavna uredba (Uredba (EU) št. 911/2010) pokriva le začetne dejavnosti in bo prenehala veljati konec leta 2013?
When will the Commission submit a legislative proposal on the future funding and governance of the GMES programme, bearing in mind that the current regulation (Regulation (EU) No 911/2010) only covers initial operations and will expire by the end of 2013?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000326/2011
Question for oral answer O-000326/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Čezmejni učinki zakonodaje tretjih držav in zakonodaja EU o varstvu podatkov
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Extraterritorial impact of third-country legislation and EU data protection laws
Zakonodaja tretjih držav utegne imeti čezmejne učinke, ki lahko neposredno vplivajo na podjetja in državljane na ozemlju EU.
Third-country legislation may have an extraterritorial impact, directly affecting companies and citizens within EU territory.
Ta zakonodaja je lahko v nasprotju z zakonodajo EU, na primer na področju varstva osebnih podatkov.
Such legislation may clash with EU legislation, for example on data protection.
Različni ameriški zakoni – o zdravstvenem varstvu (Medicare Act), izpolnjevanju davčnih obveznosti ameriških državljanov, ki so imetniki bančnih računov v tujini (FATCA), o nadzoru sodelovanja posameznikov s tujimi obveščevalnimi službami (FISA) in boju proti terorizmu (Patriot Act) – zahtevajo posredovanje osebnih podatkov, shranjenih v Evropi, oblastem ZDA.
Thus the Medicare Act, FATCA, FISA and the Patriot Act require the submission of personal data stored in Europe to the US authorities.
Ali Komisija meni, da lahko zakonodaja tretje države, na primer navedena ameriška zakonodaja, dejansko prevlada nad zakonodajo EU o varstvu podatkov ter pravicah in jamstvih, ki jo EU nudi državljanom in podjetjem?
Does the Commission consider that third-country legislation, like these examples of US legislation, can effectively overrule relevant EU data protection legislation and the rights and guarantees it provides for citizens and businesses?
Ali je Komisija seznanjena z drugimi primeri zakonodaje tretjih držav z čezmejnimi učinki, ki je v nasprotju z zakonodajo EU o varstvu osebnih podatkov in sorodnimi pravicami?
Is the Commission aware of any other examples of third-country legislation with extraterritorial impact that conflicts with relevant EU data protection legislation and related rights?
Ali meni, da posredovanje osebnih podatkov tretjim državam, kot se zahteva v navedenih primerih zakonodaje ZDA, pomeni kršitev zadevne zakonodaje EU o varstvu podatkov?
Does the Commission consider that transferring personal data to third countries, as required in the above mentioned examples of US legislation, constitutes a violation of relevant EU data protection legislation?
Kako bo nemudoma ukrepala, da bi ta vprašanja obravnavala z ustreznimi organi ZDA, in na kakšen način namerava zaščititi in zastopati interese državljanov EU ter podjetij s sedežem v EU?
What immediate action will the Commission take to address these issues with relevant US authorities, and what will the Commission do to protect and represent the interests of EU citizens and EU-based companies?
Katere takojšnje ukrepe bo sprejela, da bi zagotovila učinkovito izvrševanje predpisov EU o varstvu osebnih podatkov in da zakonodaja tretje države ne bi prevladala nad zakonodajo EU ter tako izničila pravic in jamstev, ki jih ta zagotavlja?
What immediate action will the Commission take to ensure that EU data protection rules are effectively enforced and that third-country legislation does not take precedence over EU legislation, thereby nullifying the rights and guarantees provided by it?
Ali ne bi morala ZDA pozvati, naj osebnih podatkov ne zahtevajo od podjetij, temveč naj se v zvezi s tem obrnejo na države, pri tem pa izraziti podporo preprečevanju davčnih utaj in izogibanja plačil davkov?
While stressing support for the fight against tax evasion and avoidance, should the Commission not urge the US to address states, rather than require companies to hand over personal data?
Se strinja, da izvajanje zakona FATCA ne bi bilo potrebno, če bi ZDA sprejele samodejno izmenjavo informacij, kakor je opredeljena v direktivi EU o obdavčitvi dohodka od prihrankov, ki bi jo bilo treba razširiti na druge oblike dohodkov?
Would the Commission agree that acceptance by the USA of automatic information exchange as enshrined in the EU Savings Tax Directive – to be extended to other forms of income – would make the application of FATCA to the EU redundant?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000327/2011
Question for oral answer O-000327/2011
v imenu Odbora za promet in turizem Zadeva: Učinkovito reševanje pomorskega piratstva
on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism Subject: Facing effectively the challenge of maritime piracy
Evropski parlament je problem pomorskega piratstva obravnaval v svoji resoluciji z dne 26. novembra 2009 in se zavzel za politično rešitev problema piratstva v obalnih vodah Somalije.
The European Parliament addressed the problem of maritime piracy in its resolution of 26 November 2009 and advocated a political solution to the problem of piracy off the Somali coast.
Od takrat se je nevarnost piratstva v Indijskem oceanu hitro povečala in ogrozila regionalno stabilnost, svetovno trgovino in vse oblike pomorskega prometa in ladijskega prevoza, vključno z ribiškimi ladjami.
Since then, the threat of piracy in the Indian Ocean has increased rapidly, becoming a danger to regional stability, world trade and all forms of maritime transport and shipping, including fishing vessels.
Ali lahko glede na to Svet odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Against that background, can the Council answer the following questions:
Kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti ali se načrtujejo:
What measures have been taken or are being planned:
– da bi obravnavali vzroke za piratstvo, nastale na kopnem v državah izvora piratov,
– to address the land-based causes of the problem in the countries of origin of pirates,
– da bi izpustili 450-600 pomorščakov, ki so jih pirati zajeli kot talce,
– to secure the release of the 450-600 seafarers currently held hostage by pirates,
– da bi oblikovali usklajen pristop EU do vprašanja uporabe certificiranega oboroženega osebja na plovilih?
– to develop a harmonised EU approach to the issue of the use of certified armed personnel on board vessels?
Kakšni so načrti za misijo EU-NAVFOR Atalanta, zlasti glede zagotavljanja učinkovitosti odziva EU na pomorsko piratstvo, glede na to, da se je število sodelujočih ladij, ki je leta 2009 znašalo prek 35, v letu 2011 zmanjšalo na zgolj 10?
What are the plans for the EU-NAVFOR Atalanta mission, in particular as regards ensuring the effectiveness of the EU’s response to maritime piracy, bearing in mind that the number of ships involved has shrunk from over 35 in 2009 to only 10 in 2011?
Katere ukrepe bi bilo treba sprejeti na mednarodni ravni, zlasti pod okriljem OZN in Mednarodne pomorske organizacije, da bi povečali mednarodno sodelovanje v boju proti pomorskemu piratstvu?
What action should be taken at international level, in particular under the auspices of the UN and the International Maritime Organisation, to enhance international cooperation in the fight against maritime piracy?
Kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti, da bi izsledili in zasegli vsote za odkupnine, nakazane na bančne račune v državah članicah EU?
What measures have been taken to ensure that ransom monies paid into bank accounts in EU Member States can be traced and confiscated?
Kako namerava Svet prepričati tretje države, naj sprejmejo enake ukrepe, da denarja za odkupnino ne bo več možno nakazati na bančne račune v teh državah?
How will the Council convince third countries to take equivalent measures so that piracy ransom monies can no longer be paid into bank accounts in those countries?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000328/2011
Question for oral answer O-000328/2011
Ali lahko glede na to Komisija odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Against that background, can the Commission answer the following questions:
- da bi obravnavali vzroke za piratstvo, nastale na kopnem v državah izvora piratov,
– to address the land-based causes of the problem in the countries of origin of pirates,
- da bi izpustili 450-600 pomorščakov, ki so jih pirati zajeli kot talce,
– to secure the release of the 450-600 seafarers currently held hostage by pirates,
- da bi oblikovali usklajen pristop EU do vprašanja uporabe certificiranega oboroženega osebja na plovilih?
– to develop a harmonised EU approach to the issue of the use of certified armed personnel on board vessels?
Kako namerava Komisija prepričati tretje države, naj sprejmejo enake ukrepe, da denarja za odkupnino ne bo več možno nakazati na bančne račune v teh državah?
How will the Commission convince third countries to take equivalent measures so that piracy ransom monies can no longer be paid into bank accounts in those countries?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000329/2011
Question for oral answer O-000329/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Položaj migrantov v Grčiji
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: The situation of migrants in Greece
Razmere na področju azila so v Grčiji že dolgo zaskrbljujoče.
Concerns about the asylum situation in Greece are longstanding.
Gre za državo, ki jo sestavljajo otoki, zaradi česar je težko nadzorovati meje, kar pritegne veliko migrantov in prosilcev za azil.
The country is made up of islands with borders which are difficult to control, attracting a lot of migrants and asylum seekers.
Država nima delujočega sistema za sprejemanje in obravnavanje prošenj za azil (januarja 2011 je Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice Grčijo obsodilo zaradi sprejemanja prosilcev za azil in nezakonitih migrantov v ponižujočih razmerah), poleg tega pa se sooča z gospodarskimi problemi.
It lacks a functioning asylum reception and processing system (in January 2011, the European Court of Human Rights found Greece guilty of hosting asylum seekers and irregular migrants in degrading conditions) and is currently facing economic problems.
Grški organi so se konec leta 2010 zavezali k izvedbi obsežne reforme svojih politik o azilu in migraciji ter sprejeli nacionalni načrt za azil in obvladovanje migracij.
At the end of 2010 the Greek authorities committed to implement a vast reform of their asylum and migration policies and adopted a National Plan on Asylum and Migration Management.
V okviru načrta so glede na prvo četrtletno poročilo delovne skupine Komisije za Grčijo (z dne 17. novembra) dosegli nekaj napredka, med drugim ustanovitev enote za podporo pri prošnjah za azil, povečanje števila ugoditev prošnjam za azil ter ustanovitev pristojnega organa za nadzor nad migranti ob njihovem prihodu.
According to the first quarterly report from the Commission Task Force for Greece (17 November), some progress has been achieved under the plan, which includes the creation of a support unit for asylum requests, an increased number of favourable answers to asylum requests, and the setting in place of an authority responsible for the oversight of migrants when they arrive.
Vendar je treba storiti še več.
But more is needed.
Po podatkih nevladnih organizacij, kot sta Médecins Sans Frontières in Human Rights Watch, ter Komisije so humanitarne razmere v centru za pridržanje v regiji Evros na meji s Turčijo še vedno zelo slabe.
The humanitarian situation in detention centres in the Evros region, on the border with Turkey, is still very bad according to NGOs like Médecins Sans Frontières and Human Rights Watch and to the Commission.