natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vloga koordinatorjev je, da skupaj z ustreznimi državami opredelijo merljive cilje in strateške projekte za izvajanje strategije, zlasti pa finančna sredstva, ki so za to potrebna.
The role of the coordinators is to define, together with the Member States concerned, measurable objectives and strategic projects for the implementation of the strategy, as well as, and above all, the financial resources required for that implementation.
Ali lahko Komisija pove, na kateri stopnji je opredeljevanje navedenih ciljev in projektov ter kakšna finančna sredstva je treba zagotoviti za njihovo izvajanje?
Can the Commission provide information on the stage reached in identifying the above measurable objectives and strategic projects, and also on the financial resources required for their implementation?
Ali lahko pove, kdaj bodo sprejeti in objavljeni?
Can it give a date for their adoption and publication?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000219/2011
Question for Question Time H-000219/2011
Delno zasedanje: julij 2011
Part-session: July 2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Prednostne naloge na področju prostovoljstva
(ALDE) Subject: Priorities for volunteering
Rada bi pozdravila poljsko predsedovanje EU in mu zaželela srečo pri šestmesečnem vodenju Evropskega sveta.
I would like to welcome the Polish Presidency and wish them well in their six-month stewardship of the European Council.
Pri tem bi želela vedeti, kakšne so prednostne naloge Sveta za prihajajoče predsedstvo glede prostovoljstva in kaj želi doseči?
In this light, what are the Council’s priorities for volunteering for the upcoming Presidency and what does it hope to achieve?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000220/2011
Question for Question Time H-000220/2011
Ali lahko Komisija poda svoje mnenje o primerih, v katerih bi Uredba (ES) št. 561/2006 preprečevala voznikom, da bi delali več kot 30 ur tedensko?
Can the Commission comment on the situation where Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 would prevent drivers from working more than 30 hours per week?
Kakšna pravna sredstva bi Komisija predlagala?
What remedies would the Commission propose?
Naprimer, nekdo dvakrat dnevno, od ponedeljka do petka, od pet do šest ur vozi šolski avtobus na razdalji, ki je krajša od 40 km.
For example, a person drives a short school run of less than 40km, twice per day each day from Monday to Friday, for between five and six hours.
V soboto se tej osebi ponudi možnost, da opravi od šest do devet ur dolgo vožnjo, ki bi se končala v soboto do 20.00 ure (skupaj z neprekinjenim odmorom 45 minut), toda zaradi zahteve po 45-urnem tedenskem počitku v ponedeljek ne sme ob 8.00 začeti voziti šolskega avtobusa.
He has the opportunity on a Saturday to drive another run for between six and nine hours, finishing on Saturday at 20.00 (including an uninterrupted break of 45 minutes), but the required weekly rest period of 45 hours means that he cannot start his school bus run at 08.00 on Monday.
Na kakšen način namerava Komisija obravnavati podobne primere, kjer uporaba direktive pomeni, da so vozniki (kot je vidno iz tega primera) omejeni na 30 vožnje na teden in se ne morejo preživljati?
How does the Commission propose to deal with situations like this where the application of the directive means that drivers – as in this example – are restricted to driving 30 hours per week and unable to earn a living?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000221/2011
Question for Question Time H-000221/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Revizija daytonskega sporazuma
(PPE) Subject: Review of the Dayton Accords
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000222/2011
Question for Question Time H-000222/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Železniška os TEN 17
(PPE) Subject: TEN railway axis No 17
Kako Komisija ocenjuje dejstvo, da naj bi pod centrom Münchna izkopali drugo progo za osrednji del mestne železnice, ki ne bo primerna ne za regionalne ne za linijske vlake, zaradi nastalih stroškov pa bo za nedoločen čas prestavljena izgradnja hitre povezave z münchenskim letališčem ter dograditev proge München-Mühldorf-Freilassing?
What does the Commission think of the fact that a second S-Bahn main section is to be dug beneath the city centre of Munich, which is suitable neither for regional nor long-distance rail transport, the cost of which, however, will lead to the high-speed link with Munich airport and the extension of the Munich-Mühldorf-Freilassing route becoming a remote prospect?
Ali to ne ogroža pomembnega odseka evropske železniške magistrale od Pariza in Strasbourga prek Münchna do Dunaja, Bratislave in Budimpešte, in kakšen je trenutno veljavni rok za dokončanje tega prednostnega prometnega projekta?
Does this not jeopardise an important section of the Main Line for Europe from Paris and Strasbourg via Munich to Vienna, Bratislava and Budapest, and what does the timetable for completing this priority transport project currently look like?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000223/2011
Question for Question Time H-000223/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Pristop Hrvaške k EU
(PPE) Subject: Accession of Croatia
Prosimo Svet, da predstavi svoje mnenje o tem, ali je pristop Hrvaške k EU umesten glede na sedanji gospodarski položaj in krizo, ki jo preživlja evro v nekaterih državah članicah?
Could the Council outline whether it believes the accession of Croatia to be desirable given the current economic situation and the euro crisis in certain Member States?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000224/2011
Question for Question Time H-000224/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Prepoved prinašanja tekočin v ročni prtljagi na letala
(PPE) Subject: Ban on liquids in airline hand luggage
Kakšno je trenutno stanje glede sprostitve prepovedi prenašanja tekočin, aerosolov in gelov v ročni prtljagi po odložitvi vmesnega ukrepa sprostitve prepovedi dne 29. aprila 2011?
What is the current situation regarding the relaxation of the ban on carry-on liquids, aerosols and gels following the deferral of the interim relaxation measure on 29 April 2011?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000225/2011
Question for Question Time H-000225/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Konkurenčno pravo in javne dobrine
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Competition law and public property
Družba Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) in grška vlada sta 23. septembra 2010 podpisali memorandum o soglasju, ki med drugim omogoča uporabo območja nekdanjega letališča Helenikon v komercialne in stanovanjske namene.
On 23 September 2010 the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) and the Greek government signed a Memorandum of Understanding, providing, inter alia, for the commercial and residential development of the former Ellinikon airport site.
Nekateri novinarski viri trdijo, da se namerava družba QIA iz naložbe umakniti zaradi ovir, ki jih postavlja evropsko konkurenčno pravo.
According to press sources, the QIA now intends to withdraw from this particular investment, citing obstacles erected by European competition law.
Ali lahko Komisija – ne glede na to, da bi moralo to območje postati zeleno območje, saj je v Atenah vsakodnevno zabeležena prekomerna onesnaženost ozračja, in ne glede na politična razhajanja, ki bi se lahko pojavila, ker se je grška vlada odločila odstopiti javno dobrino v vrednosti 50 milijard evrov –, odgovori na naslednji vprašanji:
Regardless of the fact that this area should be a 'green lung' for Athens, given the daily degradation of the city's environment by air pollution, and regardless of possible political disagreements about the Greek government's commitment to sell off public assets worth €50 billion, will the Commission say:
Ali so bile vložene pritožbe zaradi dejanskih kršitev konkurenčnega prava EU v postopku, ki ga izvaja družba QIA?
Have there been any complaints about breaches of EU competition law in the procedure initiated with the QIA?
Kateri so po mnenju Komisije zakoniti postopki, ki jih je treba v tem primeru spoštovati ?
What are, in the Commission's opinion, the correct procedures to be followed in such cases?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000226/2011
Question for Question Time H-000226/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Stališče Komisije o megatovornjakih
(S&D) Subject: Commission's position on mega-trucks
V nekaterih nemških zveznih deželah naj bi začeli s testiranjem t.i. megatovornjakov v tovornem prometu.
So-called mega-trucks are to be brought into operation for trial purposes in freight transport in some German Länder.
Ta do 60 ton težka in več kot 25 metrov dolga tovorna vozila bodo brez dvoma bolj obremenjevala infrastrukturo kot običajna tovorna vozila.
Given that these trucks weigh up to 60 tonnes and are more than 25 metres long, there is no doubt that they will cause more wear and tear on infrastructure than conventional lorries.
Poleg tega se je bati, da bo uvedba teh vozil trajno ogrozila cilj modalnega prehoda na tirni tovorni promet.
There is also a risk that using these vehicles will cause lasting damage to the goal of bringing about a modal shift to rail transport.
Komisija je v beli knjigi o prometu omenjala neodvisne študije o morebitni uvedbi daljših in težjih tovornih vozil.
In the Transport White Paper the Commission referred to independent studies on the possible use of longer and heavier trucks.
Ali so te študije že privedle do rezultatov?
Have these studies already produced results?
Ali se Komisija jasno opredeljuje za uvedbo megatovornjakov oziroma proti njej?
Does the Commission have a clear position for or against the use of mega-trucks?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000227/2011
Question for Question Time H-000227/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Podpora majhnim podjetjem in zasebnim pobudam
(S&D) Subject: Support for small businesses and individual initiative
Eden od načinov, kako se lahko regije EU otresejo gospodarske krize in postanejo konkurenčnejše, je tudi podpora majhnim in srednje velikim podjetjem.
Promoting SMEs is one of the ways in which the regions of the European Union can emerge from the economic crisis and become competitive.
V večini držav članic EU so majhna in srednje velika podjetja tista, ki ustvarijo večino delovnih mest.
In most EU Member States, it is SMEs that create the majority of jobs.
Žal pa se v novih članicah EU, tudi v Litvi, majhnim in srednje velikim podjetjem nalaga dodatne računovodske in kakovostne zahteve ter obremenjujoče davščine, omejuje se zasebne pobude in dejavnosti, za katere je potrebna licenca.
Unfortunately, in the new Member States, including Lithuania, SMEs are subject to additional requirements regarding accounting and quality, as well as heavy taxation, and there are restrictions on individual initiative and on operations for which a licence is required.
Ali namerava Komisija predlagati ali sprejeti konkretne ukrepe za pomoč nacionalnim vladam, da ne bodo dajale prednosti velikim podjetjem in izključevale majhnih podjetij, ki so najokretnejša in najhitrejša pri ustvarjanju bogastva?
Will the Commission propose specific support measures to ensure that national governments do not favour large businesses and exclude small ones, which contribute most flexibly and quickly to wealth creation?
Kakšne konkretne rezultate se pričakuje na tem področju?
What specific results are anticipated in this field?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000228/2011
Question for Question Time H-000228/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Priznanje palestinske države
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Recognition of the State of Palestine
Razmere so zrele, da Organizacija združenih narodov že septembra letos prizna palestinsko državo v njenih mejah iz leta 1967 s prestolnico vzhodni Jeruzalem.
The relevant conditions have now been met so that the United Nations can recognise the State of Palestine on the basis of its 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as the capital, as of September 2011.
Najnovejše izjave Obamove administracije, ki so uradno naklonjene ustanovitvi palestinske države na temelju meja iz leta 1967, kar bi pomenilo, da se mora Izrael umakniti z Zahodnega brega in iz vzhodnega Jeruzalema, so jasno sporočilo mednarodni skupnosti, naj ukrepa v tej smeri.
The latest statements from the Obama administration, which officially endorse the creation of a Palestinian state on the basis of the 1967 borders, which would in turn entail Israel's withdrawal from the whole of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, could encourage the entire international community to adopt a similar stance.
Ali se glede na zgodovinski pomen tega političnega dejanja Komisija namerava pridružiti procesu priznanja palestinske države?
In view of the historic impact that a political act of this kind would have, does the Commission intend to participate actively in the process of recognising the State of Palestine?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000230/2011
Question for Question Time H-000230/2011
(ECR) Zadeva: Vojaško sodelovanje med Kitajsko in Pakistanom
(ECR) Subject: Military cooperation between China and Pakistan
Kaj meni Svet o morebitnem vojaškem sodelovanju med Kitajsko in Pakistanom?
What is the Council’s take on potential military cooperation between China and Pakistan?
Kakšno je mnenje Sveta o vplivu, ki bi ga lahko to sodelovanje imelo na ravnovesje sil na kontinentu?
How does the Council think this will affect the balance of power in Asia?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000231/2011
Question for Question Time H-000231/2011
(ECR) Zadeva: Kršenje svobode govora na Poljskem
(ECR) Subject: Breach of free speech in Poland
Ali se namerava Komisija odzvati na kršenja svobode govora, ki so jih zagrešile tajne službe in policija na Poljskem?
Is the Commission intending to take action in response to breaches of the freedom of speech carried out by Poland’s secret service and police?
V tem primeru je posredovala Fundacija Helsinki za človekove pravice, ki deluje na Poljskem.
The Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights in Poland has taken action in response to the latter case.
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000232/2011
Question for Question Time H-000232/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Priznanje palestinske države
(PPE) Subject: Recognition of the Palestinian State
Verjetno ste seznanjeni s kampanjo predsednika Palestinske uprave Mahmuda Abasa, da bi Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov jeseni priznala neodvisno palestinsko državo.
You may well be aware of the campaign launched by the President of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, to achieve the recognition of an independent Palestinian State within the UN General Assembly this autumn.
Kakšno je stališče Sveta do te kampanje in kako bo Evropska unija usklajevala svoje delovanje v sistemu Združenih narodov, preden bo o tej pomembni odločitvi razpravljala in glasovala Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov?
What is the position of the Council regarding this campaign and will the EU coordinate its actions within the UN system ahead of this important decision to be considered and voted upon in the UN General Assembly?
Kako Svet ocenjuje pakt enotnosti, ki sta ga v začetku maja v Kairu sklenila Fatah in Hamas?
What is the assessment of the unity pact made between Fatah and Hamas at the beginning of May in Cairo?
Je po mnenju Sveta ta sporazum pozitiven ali negativen dejavnik v mirovnih pogajanjih, ki potekajo med Izraelom in Palestinsko upravo?
Does the Council see this agreement as a positive or a negative factor in the ongoing peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority?
Kako bo ta sporazum vplival na stališče Evropske unije do mirovnega procesa ter zlasti na odnose s Palestinsko upravo?
How will this agreement change the position of the EU regarding the peace process and especially its relations with the Palestinian Authority?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000233/2011
Question for Question Time H-000233/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Recikliranje odpadnih električnih naprav
(PPE) Subject: Recycling of electrical waste
Z napredkom tehnologije ljudje vedno hitreje posodabljajo svoje stare električne naprave.
As technology becomes more advanced, people are upgrading their old electrical items at an ever-increasing rate.
Stari mobilni telefoni, televizorji, računalniki in druge električne naprave ter naprave, ki delujejo na baterije, lahko ob nepravilnem odlaganju povzročajo onesnaženost.
Old mobile phones, televisions, computers and other electrical and battery-operated devices may cause pollution if not disposed of correctly.
Nova Okvirna direktiva o odpadkih, ki bi se morala prenesti v zakonodajo že do 12. decembra 2010, v številnih državah EU še vedno ni postala del nacionalne zakonodaje.
The new Waste Framework Directive, which should have been transposed by 12 December 2010, has still not passed into national law in many EU countries.
Komisija je januarja 2011 objavila poročilo, ki kaže, da so med državami članicami velikanske razlike glede recikliranje elektronskih naprav.
The Commission published a report in January 2011 showing that there are huge differences between Member States in relation to recycling electronic devices.
Kako namerava Svet obravnavati ta problem?
How does the Council plan to tackle this problem?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000234/2011
Question for Question Time H-000234/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Nacionalna agencija za upravljanje sredstev
(PPE) Subject: National Asset Management Agency
Minilo je že več kot leto, odkar je Komisija v skladu s predpisi za državno pomoč odobrila ustanovitev Nacionalne agencije za upravljanje sredstev (NAMA) na Irskem.
It is now over a year since the Commission approved the establishment of the National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) in Ireland under State aid rules.
Z ozirom na morebiten vpliv sheme NAMA na evropsko konkurenčno pravo je Komisija od irskih oblasti zahtevala, naj se obvežejo, da bodo Komisiji in irskemu nacionalnemu organu za konkurenco vsako leto predložile poročilo o uporabi pooblastil agencije NAMA po njeni ustanovitvi, kar so irske oblasti tudi storile.
In light of the potential effects of the NAMA scheme on European competition law, the Commission requested, and obtained, a commitment from the Irish authorities that yearly reports would be submitted to both the Commission and the Irish national competition authorities on the use of NAMA’s post-acquisition powers.
Ali je Komisija po tem letu še zmeraj zadovoljna s shemo NAMA?
A year on, is the Commission still satisfied with the NAMA scheme?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000235/2011
Question for Question Time H-000235/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Nadaljevanje projekta CALYPSO po koncu izvajanja pripravljalnega ukrepa
(S&D) Subject: Maintaining CALYPSO after the preparatory action stage
Pripravljalni ukrep CALYPSO je uspešen z gospodarskega in socialnega vidika, saj v nizki sezoni omogoča nadnacionalne turistične izmenjave skupin, ki težje potujejo.
The CALYPSO preparatory action has been a success in both economic and social terms since it has enabled cross-border tourism exchanges in the low season for groups that would not normally be able to go on holiday.
Pri prizadevanjih za konsolidacijo vloge turizma kot pomembne gospodarske dejavnosti v Evropi, kjer so letni časi eden od glavnih izzivov za evropski turistični sektor, je treba ohraniti uspešne projekte, kot je CALYPSO.
Since tourism, as a key economic sector in Europe, should be encouraged, and its seasonal nature is one of the main challenges for the tourism industry in Europe, particularly successful initiatives, such as CALYPSO, should be maintained.
To je zadnje leto, ko CALYPSO deluje kot pripravljalni ukrep, in povečanje proračuna na 1,5 milijona evrov je po mnenju Komisije jasen znak, da Parlament ta ukrep podpira.
The CALYPSO preparatory action has entered its final year and, as the Commission has stated, the increase in its budget to EUR 1.5 million is a clear sign of Parliament’s support for it.
Ali namerava Komisija po koncu izvajanja pripravljalnega ukrepa podpreti CALYPSO kot program Skupnosti?
Does the Commission intend to advocate keeping CALYPSO on as an EU programme following the end of the preparatory action?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000236/2011
Question for Question Time H-000236/2011
Komisija v odgovoru na vprašanje H–0332/2010 ni predstavila statističnih ali numeričnih podatkov o tem, kako posamezne države napredujejo z izvajanjem splošne prepovedi privezovanja svinj iz direktive 2001/88/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2001 (kodificirana v Direktivi Sveta 2008/120/ES), ki z letom 2013 prepoveduje privezovanje brejih svinj.
In its answer to question H-0332/10 the Commission does not give any statistics or figures on what progress the individual Member States have made in implementing the comprehensive requirement for sows to be untethered set out in Directive 2001/88/EC of 23 October 2001 (codified in Council Directive 2008/120/EC), which lays down that all in-pig sows are to be untethered from 2013.
Glede na to, da je bila ta zakonodaja sprejeta 12 let pred začetkom njene veljavnosti, bi bilo izjemoma zanimivo izvedeti numerične podatke o tem, kako so države članice napredovale pri njenem izvajanju.
Since this legislation was adopted 12 years before its entry into force, it would, exceptionally, be interesting to have figures to show what progress the Member States have made towards implementation.
Ali bo Komisija predložila/zbrala (konkretne numerične) podatke o tem, kolikšen je delež neprivezanih svinj v vsaki državi članici?
Will the Commission supply and/or compile data (containing specific figures) showing the proportion of untethered sows in each of the Member States?
Ali lahko Komisija navede morebitne nacionalne raziskave?
Can the Commission cite any national studies?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000237/2011
Question for Question Time H-000237/2011
Uredba (ES) št. 261/2004, katere glavni cilj je varovati in informirati letalske potnike, je v uporabi že od leta 2005.
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 came into force in 2005, with the key aim of ensuring that airline passengers were protected and properly informed.
Komisija je sama začela kampanje ozaveščanja, medtem ko letalske družbe nenehno kršijo to uredbo, zaradi česar potniki ostajajo brez hitrih in učinkovitih pravnih sredstev.
The Commission has run its own awareness-raising campaigns on the subject, yet airlines repeatedly violate the regulation, leaving passengers without swift and effective remedies.
Poleg tega je rezervacija vozovnic prek interneta postala goljufija: tako vozovnica od Bruslja do Strasbourga pri rednem prevozniku z oglaševano ceno 98 EUR na koncu stane 219,60 EUR in vključuje celo dodatek, ki se imenuje „fuel fee“.
Meanwhile, online booking has turned into a racket: a ticket from Brussels to Strasbourg with an ordinary carrier, advertised and heavily promoted at the price of EUR 98, ends up costing a total of EUR 219.60, including am additional ‘fuel fee’.
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000238/2011
Question for Question Time H-000238/2011
(ECR) Zadeva: Evropska infrastruktura
(ECR) Subject: European infrastructure
Združenje DIGITALEUROPE je nedavno objavilo poročilo z naslovom Vizija 2020: program preobrazbe za digitalno obdobje, v katerem opozarja na prednostne naloge, ki bi jim s ciljem ohranitve konkurenčnosti v globalnem okolju 21. stoletja morala slediti EU.
DIGITALEUROPE recently published a report entitled ‘Vision 2020: A Transformational Agenda for the Digital Age’ drawing attention to priorities which should be followed by the EU in remaining competitive in the global environment in the 21st century.
V dokumentu so bile izpostavljene številne zanimive smernice:
The document raised a number of interesting pointers:
vlaganja v digitalno infrastrukturo spodbujajo rast in nastanek novih delovnih mest;
digital infrastructure investment drives growth and job creation;
dolgoročno konkurenčnost Evrope bodo precej bolj okrepila vlaganja v področja, kot so širokopasovna omrežja, kot pa vlaganja v fizično infrastrukturo;
the long term competitiveness of Europe is much more enhanced with investment in areas like broadband compared to physical infrastructure;