natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kako namerava Svet še pomagati grškim organom pri tem, da bi črpali sredstva, ki so jim bila namenjena, izboljšali sprejemne zmogljivosti in zagotovili višji standard za ljudi, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, ustrezno uporabili sredstva in hitro izboljšali humanitarne razmere v centrih za pridržanje v regiji Evros?
What further actions will the Council undertake to help the Greek authorities use the resources that have been made available to them to improve reception capacities and ensure higher standards for people in need of international protection, spend the resources appropriately, and rapidly remedy the humanitarian situation in detention centres like those in Evros?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000041/2012
Question for oral answer O-000041/2012
Grške oblasti so se konec leta 2010 zavezale k celoviti reformi azilne in migracijske politike ter sprejele nacionalni načrt za azilno politiko in obvladovanje migracij, v skladu s katerim bi morala EU za naslednja tri leta Grčiji zagotoviti finančne prispevke (redne in izredne) za infrastrukturo, storitve, strokovno znanje in usposabljanje, nadzor in ocenjevanje kakovosti sistema za obvladovanje toka priseljevanja, pa tudi nujna sredstva za izvajanje prehodne faze azilnega postopka ter za centre prvega pregleda in sprejema.
At the end of 2010, the Greek authorities committed themselves to implementing a full reform of their asylum and migration policies, and adopted a National Plan on Asylum and Migration Management, according to which the EU is requested to provide Greece, over the next three years, with financial contributions (regular and emergency) for infrastructure and services, knowhow and training, and supervision and quality assessment of the immigration flow system, as well as emergency funding for the implementation of the transition phase of the asylum process and the first screening and reception centres.
Migranti in prosilci za azil so še vedno nastanjeni v neustreznih razmerah, podpore za migrantske otroke brez spremstva pa je malo ali pa je sploh ni.
Migrants and asylum seekers continue to be detained in substandard conditions, and there is little or no assistance for unaccompanied migrant children.
Koliko sredstev nameni Komisija Grčiji za azilno politiko, iz katerih skladov se zagotavljajo ta sredstva in za katere ukrepe?
How much funding is the Commission providing to Greece for asylum management, under which funds and for which measures?
Kako namerava Komisija še pomagati grškim organom pri črpanju sredstev, ki so jim bila namenjena za izboljšanje sprejemne zmogljivosti in zagotovitev višjega standarda za ljudi, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, ustrezni uporabi teh sredstev in hitrem izboljšanju humanitarnih razmer v centrih za pridržanje, kakršni so v regiji Evros?
What further actions will the Commission undertake to help the Greek authorities use the resources that have been made available to them to improve reception capacities and ensure higher standards for people in need of international protection, spend the resources appropriately, and rapidly remedy the humanitarian situation in detention centres like those in Evros?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000042/2012
Question for oral answer O-000042/2012
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Nova skupna ribiška politika in trajnostni razvoj akvakulture
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: The new CFP and sustainable development of the aquaculture sector
Akvakultura prispeva k vedno večjemu deležu rib, zaužitih v Evropi, pri čemer je zabeležen velik porast uvoza iz tretjih držav.
The aquaculture sector has been accounting for a growing proportion of Europe’s fish consumption, and imports from non-EU countries are, for that reason, rising sharply.
V predlogu reforme skupne ribiške politike Komisija meni, da bi morala prihodnja politika „podpirati trajnostni okoljski, gospodarski in socialni razvoj sektorja ribogojstva“.
In the common fisheries policy reform proposal, the Commission maintains that the future CFP ‘should support the environmentally, economically and socially sustainable development of the aquaculture industry’.
Zato je potrebna močna podpora znanstvenim raziskavam in tehnološkemu razvoju na področju gojenja vrst, po možnosti avtohtonih, kar bi omogočilo poln izkoristek potenciala te dejavnosti, vključno z oblikovanjem novih delovnih mest, preseganjem obstoječih meja in ustreznim zmanjšanjem okoljskega vpliva.
If this is to happen, substantial support for scientific research and technological development will need to be channelled towards farming, preferably of native species, the aim being to exploit the industry’s potential to the full, creating new jobs, overcoming the present limitations, and minimising the related environmental impacts.
Trajnostni razvoj sektorja v državah članicah bo moral zagotoviti diverzifikacijo proizvodnje in prehrambene ponudbe ter povečanje njene kakovosti z vzporednim zagotavljanjem večje prehrambene varnosti.
Sustainable development of aquaculture in the Member States should serve to diversify production and the supply of foodstuffs and enhance their quality while making for greater food safety.
Kako bo skupna ribiška politika podprla razvoj evropske akvakulture na omenjenih področjih?
How will the CFP support sustainable development of European aquaculture in the areas mentioned above?
S katerimi instrumenti bo to izvedeno?
What means will it employ?
Kako bo Komisija v sektorskih strateških smernicah ustrezno upoštevala geografske, ozemeljske, kulturne in družbenoekonomske posebnosti vsake države članice?
When determining the broad lines of its aquaculture strategy, how will the Commission make the necessary allowance for the specific geographical, territorial, cultural, and socio-economic characteristics of each Member State?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000043/2012
Question for oral answer O-000043/2012
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Poziv k uravnoteženi zastopanosti spolov v izvršnem odboru Evropske centralne banke
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Call for gender-balanced representation on the ECB Executive Board
Organizacije za pravice žensk po svetu že več desetletij poudarjajo pomen ravnotežja med spoloma v javnem in zasebnem sektorju.
For many decades women’s rights organisations across the world have emphasised the importance of gender balance in both the public and private spheres.
Obžalovanja vredno je dejstvo, da ženske predstavljajo le 18 odstotkov svetovnih političnih organov za sprejemanje odločitev.
It is deeply regrettable that women comprise only 18 percent of the world’s political decision-making assemblies.
Ženske povprečno zaslužijo 32 odstotkov manj kot moški sodelavci.
On average women earn 32 percent less than their male counterparts.
70 odstotkov ljudi, ki živi z manj kot dolarjem dnevno, je žensk.
70 percent of people who live on less than a dollar per day are women.
Gre za jasno feminizacijo revščine.
This is a clear case of feminisation of poverty.
Svetovna gospodarska kriza, ki so jo povzročili najbogatejši na svetu, ima daljnosežne posledice za ženske.
The global economic crises, created by the world’s wealthiest, have had far-reaching effects on women.
Družbenoekonomska izključitev žensk na podlagi neutemeljenih diskriminatornih družbenih opredelitev ženske in moške vloge vpliva ne le na ženske in njihove človekove pravice, temveč tudi na razvoj trajnostnih gospodarstev in na varovanje naravnega okolja.
The socioeconomic exclusion of women, based on ungrounded discriminatory social definitions of female and male roles, affects not only women and their human rights but also the development of sustainable economies and the protection of the natural environment.
Prenizka zastopanost žensk na vseh ravneh gospodarskega odločanja je skrb vzbujajoča težava.
The under-representation of women at all levels of economic decision-making is an alarming problem.
Številne države članice EU so sprejele zakonodajne ukrepe, da bi povečale zastopanost žensk v upravnih odborih, po uspešnem vzoru Norveške iz leta 2005.
Several EU Member States have adopted legislative measures to increase the representation of women in boardrooms, following the successful example set by Norway in 2005.
Eden od očitnih primerov neenakosti glede na spol je Evropska centralna banka (ECB): v izvršnem odboru ni ene same ženske (niti v svetu ECB in v razširjenem svetu ECB).
One striking example of gender inequality is the ECB: there is not one single woman on the Executive Board – not even on the Governing Council or the General Council.
Kakšne ukrepe potrebujemo za boj proti taki sistemski napaki v postopku izbora, ko so rezultati nenehno slabi, ko gre za imenovanje kandidatk?
What measures do we need to combat this systematic failure in the recruiting process, when the results are continuously so poor regarding the nomination of women candidates?
Kako si bo Svet prizadeval za bolj uravnoteženo zastopanost spolov v svetu ECB, izvršnem odboru in razširjenem svetu ECB?
How will the Council work towards more gender-balanced representation in the Governing Council, the Executive Board and the General Council of the ECB?
Svet bi lahko na primer vztrajal na tem, da bi vsaka država članica v izvršni svet ECB imenovala dva kandidata, moškega in žensko.
The Council could consider, for example, insisting that each Member State nominate two candidates, a man and a woman, for the ECB Executive Board.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000044/2012
Question for oral answer O-000044/2012
Ženske povprečno zaslužijo 38 odstotkov manj kot moški sodelavci.
On average women earn 32 percent less than their male counterparts.
Družbenoekonomska izključitev žensk na podlagi neutemeljenih diskriminatornih družbenih opredelitev ženske in moške vloge, vpliva ne le na ženske in njihove človekove pravice, temveč tudi na razvoj trajnostnih gospodarstev in na varovanje naravnega okolja.
The socioeconomic exclusion of women, based on ungrounded discriminatory social definitions of female and male roles, affects not only women and their human rights but also the development of sustainable economies and the protection of the natural environment.
Kakšne ukrepe potrebujemo za boj proti taki sistemski napaki v postopku izbora, če so rezultati nenehno slabi, ko gre za imenovanje kandidatk?
What measures do we need to combat this systematic failure in the recruiting process, when the results are continuously so poor regarding the nomination of women candidates?
Kako bo Komisija ustvarila pritisk na Svet, da bi si prizadeval za bolj uravnoteženo zastopanost spolov v svetu ECB, izvršnem odboru in razširjenem svetu ECB?
How will the Commission put pressure on the Council to work towards more gender-balanced representation in the Governing Council, the Executive Board and the General Council of the ECB?
Ima Komisija predlog, kako bi zagotovili pošteno zastopanost spolov v vseh institucijah EU?
Does the Commission have a proposal for ensuring fair gender representation in all EU institutions?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000045/2012
Question for oral answer O-000045/2012
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Izbruh virusa Schmallenberg
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Schmallenberg outbreak
Virus Schmallenberg, ki pri ovcah, kozah in govedu povzroča prirojene deformacije in mrtvorojenost, se širi po precejšnjem območju severne Evrope, in sicer so bili potrjeni primeri v Nemčiji, na Nizozemskem, v Belgiji, Franciji in Veliki Britaniji.
The Schmallenberg virus, which causes a range of deformities and stillbirths in sheep, goats and cattle, is spreading across much of northern Europe, with cases reported in Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, France and the United Kingdom.
Ta novi in zaskrbljujoči izbruh je še eden izmed mnogih bolezni, ki so v zadnjih nekaj letih prizadele sektor ovčjereje in govedoreje: bolezen norih krav, goveja tuberkuloza, slinavka in parkljevka, virus bolezni modrikastega jezika in sedaj še virus Schmallenberg.
This new and worrying outbreak adds to the long list of diseases that have affected the sheep and beef sector in recent years: BSE, bovine tuberculosis, foot-and-mouth disease, bluetongue virus and now Schmallenberg.
Medtem ko se omenjeni virus še vedno širi po Evropi – zaenkrat je prizadetih več kot 1200 kmetij –, negotovost ostaja, čeprav naj bi bilo tveganje za zdravje ljudi nizko.
While the Schmallenberg virus continues to spread across Europe, with currently over 1200 affected farms, uncertainty remains, although the risk to human health is considered low.
Britansko ministrstvo za kmetijstvo je nedavno kmetom in veterinarjem priporočalo, naj pri stiku z živino upoštevajo najstrožje varnostne in higienske standarde, ter opozorilo nosečnice, naj se izognejo tesnejšemu stiku z živalmi.
The UK Department of Agriculture recently recommended that farmers and veterinarians apply the strictest possible safety and hygiene standards during contact with livestock, and also warned that pregnant women should avoid close contact with animals
Katere takojšnje ukrepe je glede na to, da je ta virus vsaj tako nevaren kot virus modrikastega jezika in da zdravila zanj ne poznamo, sprejela Komisija, da bi državam članicam pomagala pri reševanju tega izbruha ter pri zaščiti živali in ljudi?
Given that this virus is at least as dangerous as bluetongue, and that there is no known cure, what immediate action has the Commission taken to help Member States address this outbreak and protect animals and humans?
Kateri ukrepi se sprejemajo za zajezitev in preprečitev širjenja te bolezni drugod po EU?
What measures are being taken to contain the disease and prevent it spreading to the rest of the EU?
Na kateri stopnji so raziskave zdravil za ta virus?
What stage has research into a cure for this virus reached?
Ali velja prepoved uvoza ali izvoza živali, ki so zbolele za to boleznijo?
Are the animals affected by the disease subject to a ban on imports or exports?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000046/2012
Question for oral answer O-000046/2012
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Kaj je "lokalno pridelana" hrana?
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: What is 'locally produced' food?
Potrošniki se danes vse bolj zanimajo za kupovanje proizvodov z oznakami „lokalno pridelan“, „pridelan v okolici“, „iz neposredne okolice“ ali z drugimi tovrstnimi oznakami.
Nowadays consumers are increasingly interested in buying products that are ‘locally produced’, ‘produced nearby’, ‘zero-mile’ or other such designations.
Ker pa ni opredelitve ali skupnega dogovora o tem, kaj naj bi oznaka „lokalno“ pomenila, splošna uporaba takih oznak v živilskem sektorju ustvarja zmedo v EU in lahko zavaja potrošnike.
However, in the absence of a definition or a common understanding of what ‘local’ means, the widespread use of such labels in the food sector is creating confusion across the EU and could be misleading to consumers.
Nujno je treba pojasniti in ustrezno razložiti, kaj pomeni oznaka „lokalno pridelan“ ter s tem zagotoviti preglednost in preprečiti zavajanje potrošnikov.
There is an urgent need to clarify and provide a proper interpretation of the meaning of ‘locally produced’ to ensure transparency and avoid deceiving consumers.
Zato Komisiji zastavljamo naslednja vprašanja: Ali se ta koncept nanaša na razdaljo med mestom pridelave in prodaje?
We therefore ask the Commission: does this concept refer to the number of kilometres between the production site and the point of sale?
Ali to pomeni, da sta pridelava in prodaja proizvoda v istem okolišu oziroma v isti regiji ali državi?
Does it imply that production is located within the same municipality as the retailer, is it within the same region or within the same country?
Ali se lahko v nekaterih primerih oznaka „lokalno pridelan“ nanaša na čezmejno nakupovanje znotraj EU?
Can ‘locally produced’ in some cases refer to cross-border shopping within the EU?
Dejansko je lahko nakupovanje čez mejo včasih bližje ali okolju bolj prijazno kot nakupovanje v isti državi.
In fact, it can sometimes be closer and more environmentally friendly to buy across the border, for instance, instead of in the same country.
Ali gre zgolj za razdaljo ali tudi za način pridelave, na primer obrtna ali industrijska proizvodnja oziroma ali gre za malo ali veliko podjetje?
Is it only a matter of distance, or also a matter of production method, such as artisan versus industrially produced, small-scale versus larger companies?
Ali bi morale biti lokalno pridelane vse sestavine ali le glavna?
Should all the ingredients be local or only the main ingredient?
Ali namerava Komisija na podlagi tega preučiti razmere v različnih državah članicah?
Against this background, does the Commission intend to carry out an analysis of the situations in the various Member States?
Ali bo pripravila smernice za opredelitev in merila za označevanje „lokalno pridelanih“ proizvodov, da se bodo lahko potrošniki neodvisno in ozaveščeno odločali na podlagi točnih in pravilnih informacij?
Will the Commission provide guidelines for a definition and criteria for labelling what is ‘locally produced’, as a way to ensure that consumers can make free and informed choices, based on clear and correct information?
Kako namerava Komisija v prihodnje poskrbeti, da koncept „lokalno pridelan“ ne bo povzročil „živilskega nacionalizma“ ali bil v nasprotju z načeli notranjega trga?
How does the Commission intend to proceed to make sure that the concept of ‘locally produced’ does not lead to food nationalism or is against the spirit of the internal market?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000047/2012
Question for oral answer O-000047/2012
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Izbruh virusa Schmallenberg
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Schmallenberg outbreak
Ker se bolezen očitno širi z mušicami, se bo najverjetneje razširila na večje območje, ko se bodo spomladi temperature začele dvigovati in se bo začela sezona kotitve jagnjet in telet.
As this disease appears to be spread by midges, it is likely that it will spread further as temperatures begin to rise in the spring and as lambing and calving seasons begin.
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi ukrepe, ki jih bo uvedla glede tega izbruha, ter pojasni, katere ukrepe je doslej sprejela za večjo usklajenost pri zbiranju podatkov v državah članicah, kot je priporočila Evropska agencija za varnost hrane v svojem predhodnem tehničnem poročilu, objavljenem v začetku leta 2012?
Can the Commission outline what measures it is taking to address this outbreak, and what action it has taken to ensure increased coordination of data collection in Member States, as recommended by EFSA in its preliminary technical report published in early 2012?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000048/2012
Question for oral answer O-000048/2012
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Poenostavitev izdajanja vizumov za študente iz držav južnega sosedstva Unije
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Visa facilitation for students from countries in the EU's southern neighbourhood
Evropski parlament je 10. januarja 2012 gostil konferenco z naslovom Za programa Erasmus in Leonardo da Vinci Euromed.
On 10 January 2012 the European Parliament hosted a conference entitled ‘For the creation of Euromed Erasmus and Leonardo da Vinci programmes’.
Poleg tega je bila na septembrskem zasedanju 2011 v Strasbourgu z zelo veliko večino sprejeta pisna izjava na to temo.
What is more, Written Declaration No 0015/2011 on the same topic was signed by a clear majority of Members at the September 2011 part-session in Strasbourg.
Z uvedbo programa Erasmus Euromed bi se lahko Evropska unija konkretno odzvala na veliko povpraševanje po mobilnosti na tem področju.
Implementing the Euromed Erasmus programme would enable the European Union to take practical steps to respond to these widespread calls for mobility.
Vendar je pogoj za univerzitetne izmenjave dodelitev vizumov, kar pa ureja stroga in zavezujoča zakonodaja, ki je v posameznih državah gostiteljicah različna.
However, university exchanges are contingent on the granting of visas, which is covered by strict, binding rules which vary depending on the host State concerned – procedures are often far from transparent, lengthy and costly, and may even be entirely arbitrary in some cases.
Postopki za pridobitev vizuma so velikokrat nejasni in počasni ter veliko stanejo, v nekaterih primerih pa so celo samovoljni.
The Commission has repeatedly stated its willingness to foster university exchanges with the countries in the Union’s southern neighbourhood.
Evropska komisija je večkrat izjavila, da želi spodbujati univerzitetne izmenjave z državami južnega sosedstva Unije.
Although the Commission is aware of the problems concerning visas, no practical and effective solution has yet been put forward.
Tako se lahko vprašamo, ali države članice morda ne menijo, da ima upravljanje migracijskih tokov prednost pred potrebo študentov po mobilnosti.
The obvious conclusion to be drawn is that the Member States attach more importance to the management of migratory flows than to student mobility.
Kaj konkretno Svet predlaga za poenostavitev izdajanja vizumov za študente iz držav južnega sosedstva Unije?
What practical proposals can the Council make concerning visa facilitation for students from the countries in the Union’s southern neighbourhood?
Zlasti bi želeli vedeti, ali je Svet pripravljen Komisiji dati soglasje, da to vprašanje vključi v pogajalske direktive, zato da bi sklenili sporazume o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov z Marokom, Egiptom in Tunizijo?
In particular, is the Council prepared to authorise the Commission to address this question in the negotiating briefs to be drawn up in preparation for the conclusion of visa facilitation agreements with Morocco, Egypt and Tunisia?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000049/2012
Question for oral answer O-000049/2012
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Poenostavitev izdajanja vizumov za študente iz držav južnega sosedstva Unije
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Facilitating the issuing of visas to students from countries in the EU's southern neighbourhood
Peticija za ustanovitev programa Erasmus Euromed je zbrala več kot 4600 podpisov državljanov iz 24 evropskih držav in 7 držav z južne obale Sredozemlja.
The petition for a Euromed Erasmus programme has attracted over 4 600 signatures from citizens from twenty-four European countries and seven countries on the southern shore of the Mediterranean.
Poleg tega je bila na septembrskem zasedanju 2011 v Strasbourgu z zelo veliko večino sprejeta pisna izjava na to temo (0015/2011).
Furthermore, Written Declaration No. 0015/2011 on the same topic was adopted by an overwhelming majority at the September 2011 part-session in Strasbourg.
Vendar je pogoj za univerzitetne izmenjave pridobitev vizumov, kar pa ureja stroga in zavezujoča zakonodaja, ki se med posameznimi državami gostiteljicami razlikuje.
Academic exchanges depend on the issuing of visas that are subject to strict and binding legislation which varies according to the host state.
Komisija je sicer seznanjena s problematiko pridobivanja vizumov, pa vendar ni bila predstavljena nikakršna konkretna in dovolj dosledna rešitev.
While the Commission is aware of the problem of visas, no practical and sufficiently coherent solution has so far been proposed.
Tako se lahko vprašamo, ali države članice morda ne pripisujejo večjega pomena upravljanju migracijskih tokov kot potrebi po mobilnosti študentov.
One may legitimately wonder whether Member States do not consider the management of migration to be more important than the need for greater student mobility.
Kaj konkretno predlaga Komisija za poenostavitev izdajanja vizumov študentom iz držav južnega sosedstva Unije?
What practical proposals does the Commission have to facilitate the issuing of visas for students from the EU's southern neighbourhood?
Kako Komisija predvideva prednostno izdajanje dolgotrajnih vizumov za večkratni vstop študentom nekaterih tretjih držav, ki je kot možnost predvideno v vizumskem zakoniku (člen 24)?
In particular, what plans does the Commission have for granting multiple-entry, long-term visas as a matter of priority to students from certain third countries, as provided for in the Visa Code (Art. 24)?