natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali Svet ocenjuje, da je sedanja praksa, kar zadeva možnost pritožbe v primerih, ko je prošnja za vizum zavrnjena, ter preglednost in dostop do konzularnih podatkov o postopkih izdaje vizumov, v skladu s sporazumom o vizumskih olajšavah z Ukrajino?
Does the Council consider current practice as regards possibilities for appealing against visa refusals and the transparency of, and access to, consular information on visa issuance procedures to be in line with the visa liberalisation agreement with Ukraine?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0020/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0020/08
Ali namerava Komisija to pomlad predlagati, da se oblikuje jasen načrt ukrepov, ki jih bo treba sprejeti, da bo mogoče odpraviti vizume za Ukrajino?
Will the Commission this spring provide Ukraine with a clear roadmap on measures to be taken in order to move towards abolishing the visa requirements?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0021/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0021/08
Zadeva: Varstvo podatkov in pravice potrošnikov
Subject: Data protection and consumer rights
Na predstavitvi 21. januarja 2008 je odbor LIBE obravnaval uporabo osebnih podatkov v namene vedenjskega ciljanja (behavioural targeting), posebno pozornost pa je posvetil nastanku novih internetnih trgovinskih dejavnosti, ki združujejo iskalnike in oglaševanje, na primer združitev družb Google in DoubleClick ter Microsoftova ponudba za prevzem družbe Yahoo!.
On 21 January 2008 a LIBE committee hearing examined the use of personal data for the purpose of behavioural targeting, and more specifically the emergence of new internet-based trade activities, combining search engines and advertising, e.g. the Google/DoubleClick merger and the Microsoft bid to acquire Yahoo!.
Odbor LIBE je pri tem opozoril na naslednje:
The LIBE hearing considered the following:
osebni podatki so blago, pa tudi osnovni element za komercialno vedenjsko ciljanje; varstvo podatkov je zato treba obravnavati tudi v luči varstva potrošnikov; osebni podatki veljajo za blago, številna internetna podjetja v Evropi pa ne izpolnjujejo osnovnih načel varstva podatkov, začrtanih v direktivah 95/46/ES in 2002/58/ES , zaradi tega nekateri nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov sprejemajo sklepe, s katerimi nameravajo izboljšati varstvo osebnih podatkov; tudi vladne agencije čedalje pogosteje segajo po osebnih in obdelanih podatkih, kot so uporabniški profili, zbrani in shranjeni v komercialne ali zasebne namene, ter jih uporabljajo za postopke kazenskega pregona in v druge namene; takšni podatki in profili so na voljo tudi v drugih državah, ne samo v državi, kjer so bili pridobljeni; sprejeti je treba vseevropsko strategijo in jasna zavezujoča načela; glede na naravo interneta je nujno treba določiti svetovne standarde.
personal data are a commodity as well as the main element for commercial behavioural targeting; data protection is therefore to be considered also a matter of consumer protection; personal data are considered as a commodity and many of the Internet enterprises operating in Europe are not fulfilling the data protection principles outlined in Directive 95/46/EC and 2002/58/EC , resulting in some national data protection authorities adopting decisions to reinforce the protection of personal data; personal data and processed data such as user profiles, collected and stored for commercial or private purposes, are increasingly also used by government agencies for law enforcement and other purposes; such data and profiles are available in countries other than the one where they were originally collected; a Europe-wide strategy and clear mandatory principles should be adopted; given the very nature of the internet, global standards are called for urgently.
Komisarka Neelie Kroes v odgovoru na vprašanje P-6245/07 navaja, da bo Komisija v skladu z uredbo (ES) št. 139/2004 preučila vpliv združitve družb Google in DoubleClick na interese potrošnikov.
In answer P-6245/07 by Commissioner Kroes, it is stated that pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 the Commission will investigate the impact of the Google/DoubleClick merger on consumer interests.
Ali lahko Komisija v vlogi varuha pogodb glede na to, da za pravice potrošnikov do varstva podatkov še vedno veljata direktivi 95/46/ES in 2002/58/ES, ter ob upoštevanju evropske listine o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti členov 7 in 8 o pravici do zasebnosti, odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Noting that Directives 95/46/EC and 2002/58/EC remain applicable as regards consumers' right to data protection, and having regard to the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, in particular Articles 7 and 8 on the right to privacy, does the Commission as guardian of the Treaties consider that:
Ali mora internetna industrija za storitve, ki so na voljo v EU, upoštevati evropsko zakonodajo o varstvu podatkov?
the internet industry offering services accessible in the EU should respect EU data protection legislation?
Ali je zaščita osebnih podatkov tudi vprašanje blaginje potrošnikov in ali imajo potrošniki na konkurenčnem trgu pravico do visokega standarda zasebnosti?
the protection of personal data is also a matter of consumer welfare, and that in a competitive market consumers are empowered to enforce high privacy standards?
Ali morajo vse politike in odločitve EU, vključno s konkurenčno politiko in varstvom potrošnikov, spoštovati temeljne pravice EU in izpolnjevati predpise za varstvo podatkov?
all EU policies or decisions, including competition policies and consumer protection, must observe EU fundamental rights and be in line with the data protection rules?
Ali bo Komisija prevzela pobudo in v sodelovanju z Evropskim parlamentom ter delovno skupino iz člena 29 skupaj z ameriško zvezno komisijo za trgovino pripravila čezatlantska načela za varstvo podatkov, ki bi se zgledovala denimo po http://www.ftc.gov/os/2007/12/P859900stmt.pdf ?
Will the Commission take the initiative, in close cooperation with Parliament and the Article 29 Working Party, to elaborate transatlantic data protection principles, together with its counterpart, the US Federal Trade Commission, e.g. inspired by http://www.ftc.gov/os/2007/12/P859900stmt.pdf ?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0022/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0022/08
Zadeva: Strategija Sveta pred devetim rednim srečanjem konference pogodbenic konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti (COP 9) ter četrtim srečanjem pogodbenic cartagenskega protokola o biološki varnosti (COP-MOP 4)
Subject: Council's strategy for the ninth ordinary meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 9) and the fourth meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (COP-MOP 4)
Ali lahko Svet razloži svoje cilje pred bližajočo se konferenco pogodbenic, ki bo potekala med 12. in 30. majem 2008 v Bonnu?
Could the Council clarify its objectives for the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to be held in Bonn from 12 to 30 May 2008?
Na kakšen način namerava Svet vključiti poslance Evropskega parlamenta v delegacijo Skupnosti na konferenci?
How is the Council planning to involve the European Parliament Members in the Community delegation to the Conference?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0023/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0023/08
Zadeva: Strategija Komisije pred devetim rednim srečanjem konference pogodbenic konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti (COP 9) ter četrtim srečanjem pogodbenic cartagenskega protokola o biološki varnosti (COP-MOP 4)
Subject: Commission's strategy for the ninth ordinary meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 9) and the fourth meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (COP-MOP 4)
Ali lahko Komisija razloži svoje cilje pred bližajočo se konferenco pogodbenic, ki bo potekala med 12. in 30. majem 2008 v Bonnu?
Could the Commission clarify its objectives for the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to be held in Bonn from 12 to 30 May 2008?
Na kakšen način namerava Komisija vključiti poslance Evropskega parlamenta v delegacijo Skupnosti na konferenci?
How is the Commission planning to involve the European Parliament Members in the Community delegation to the Conference?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0024/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0024/08
Zadeva: Brodolom ladje New Flame in njegove posledice v zalivu Algeciras
Subject: New Flame shipwreck and its consequences in Algeciras Bay
Panamska ladja za prevoz razsutega tovora New Flame od 12. avgusta 2007 leži na morskem dnu ob obalah Algecirasa (Cádiz) in Gibraltarja.
Since 12 August 2007, the Panamanian bulk carrier New Flame has been resting on the sea floor alongside the coast of Algeciras (Cádiz) and Gibraltar.
V zadnjih mesecih je bilo več kot kilometer te obale onesnažene z nafto in skupaj je v času od 28. avgusta 2007 do 10. februarja 2008 prišlo do sedmih razlitij nafte.
In recent months, these coasts have been polluted by oil over more than one kilometre and in total, seven oil spills occurred between 28 August 2007 and 10 February 2008.
Poleg tega je oskrbovanje ladij z gorivom nenehna praksa v zalivu Algeciras.
On top of that, ongoing bunkering practices constantly take place in Algeciras Bay.
To je izjemno onesnažujoče in se izvaja ob popolnem nekaznovanje, čeprav je prepovedano.
These are extremely polluting and despite being prohibited, are carried out with the most absolute impunity.
Tako oskrbovanje ladij z gorivom kot onesnaženje, ki ga povzročajo razlitja nafte z ladje New Flame, predstavljata kršitev evropske okoljske zakonodaje na splošno in še zlasti Direktive 2005/35/ES z dne 7. septembra 2005 o onesnaževanju morja z ladij in uvedbi kazni za kršitve .
Both bunkering practices as well as contamination caused by the oil spills of the New Flame are in breach of European environmental law in general and, Directive 2005/35/CE of 7 September 2005 on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements in particular.
Kakšne konkretne ukrepe bo sprejela Evropska komisija, da bi rešila ta položaj?
In order to solve this situation, what concrete actions will the European Commission adopt?
Ali zdaj v okviru Evropske komisije te razmere preučujejo?
Is this situation currently being analysed within the European Commission?
Ali namerava Evropska komisija kot varuh pogodb začeti postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev proti eni ali več državam članicam, katerih aktivno ali pasivno ravnanje bi bilo lahko v nasprotju z zadevno evropsko zakonodajo?
As ‘guardian of the Treaties’, is the European Commission planning to launch the infringement procedure against one or several Member States whose active or passive behaviour might be in breach of the relevant European legislation?
Ali so pristojne nacionalne oblasti obvestile Evropsko komisijo o položaju ladje New Flame?
Has the European Commission been informed by the competent national authorities of the situation of the New Flame?
UL L 255 z dne 30.9.2005, str.
OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0025/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0025/08
Zadeva: Predlog Komisije o javni predstavitvi na temo zločinov genocida, zločinov proti človeštvu in vojnih zločinov, za katere so odgovorni totalitarni režimi
Subject: Proposed hearing of the Commission on 'crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by totalitarian regimes'
Pravosodni ministri iz EU so se 19. aprila 2007 dogovorili o okvirnem sklepu o boju proti nekaterim oblikam in izrazom rasizma in ksenofobije (11522/07 DROIPEN 68), ki obravnava kazniva dejanja, kot so spodbujanje k sovraštvu in nasilju ter javno opravičevanje, zanikanje ali grobo zmanjševanje pomena genocida, zločinov proti človeštvu in vojnih zločinov, kot sta jih opredelila Statut Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča ter Nürnberško sodišče.
On 19 April 2007, EU Justice Ministers reached agreement on a Framework Decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia (11522/07 DROIPEN 68), dealing with such crimes as incitement to hatred and violence and publicly condoning, denying or grossly trivialising crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined in the Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Tribunal of Nuremberg.
Kazniva dejanja, storjena iz drugih razlogov, recimo kazniva dejanja totalitarnih režimov, namerno niso bila vključena.
Crimes committed on other grounds, e.g. by totalitarian regimes, are explicitly not covered.
Komisija, ki je leta 2007 pripravila prvo predstavitev te zadnje tematike, sedaj nadaljuje dejavnosti na tem področju.
The Commission, after a first hearing in 2007 on the latter aspect is now continuing activities in this field.
Ta pobuda sovpada s težnjami po voluntaristični in deloma politični reinterpretaciji evropske zgodovine namesto uporabe metode znanstvenih raziskav.
This initiative coincides with tendencies aimed at reassessing European history by voluntaristic, partly political interpretation rather than on the basis of scientific research.
Poleg tega ne temelji na nepristranski oceni vseh totalitarnih in avtoritarnih režimov, ki so bili v 20. stoletju odgovorni za zločine proti človeštvu, genocid in vojne zločine.
Furthermore, it is not based on an objective assessment of all totalitarian and authoritarian regimes responsible for crimes against humanity, genocide and war crimes in the 20th century.
Na podlagi teh dogodkov ter v pričakovanju strokovne konference, načrtovane za 8. aprila, ter bližajoče se 40. obletnice praške pomladi:
In the light of these developments as well as in the run-up to the conference of experts scheduled for 8 April and the forthcoming 40th anniversary of the Prague Spring:
Kakšne nadaljnje dejavnosti načrtuje Komisija za spodbujanje znanstvenega pristopa k sistematiki evropskega totalitarizma ter avtoritarnih režimov?
Which further activity does the Commission plan in order to foster a scientific approach to the systematics of European totalitarianism and authoritarian regimes?
Kako namerava dvigniti raven razprave o totalitarnih in avtoritarnih režimih v evropski zgodovini 20 stoletja, vključno z nacističnimi in stalinističnimi režimi ter ultranacionalističnimi, avtoritarnimi in protidemokratičnimi pred- in povojnimi režimi, ki so (čeprav v različnem obsegu) odgovorni za zatiranje, umore in zločine proti človeštvu?
How does it intend to enhance the debate on crimes committed by totalitarian and authoritarian regimes in Europe’s history of the 20th century, including both the Nazi and Stalinist regimes as well as ultranationalist, authoritarian and antidemocratic pre- and post-war regimes responsible (albeit on a different scale) for suppression, murder and crimes against humanity?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se bo razprava osredotočila na znanstvena merila ter ne bo zlorabljena v politične namene glede na porast nacionalizma in populizma?
How will the Commission ensure that the debate focuses on scientific criteria and will not fall victim to political exploitation in the context of increasing nationalism and populism?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0026/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0026/08
Zadeva: Politični dialog za ponovno združitev Cipra
Subject: The political dialogue for a reunification of Cyprus
Po nedavnih predsedniških volitvah na Cipru sta izvoljeni predsednik Demetris Christofias in voditelj ciprskih Turkov Mehmet Ali Talat pozvala Organizacijo združenih narodov, naj čim prej organizira srečanje.
Following the recent Cyprus presidential elections, both President-elect Demetris Christofias and Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat have asked the UN to arrange a meeting as soon as possible.
Kaj namerava glede na ta nov in spodbuden razvoj dogodkov ukreniti Svet, da bi podprl prizadevanja za dosego celovite in trajne rešitve ciprskega vprašanja, zlasti v zvezi z uporabo dodeljene finančne pomoči skupnosti ciprskih Turkov, namenjene ukrepom za krepitev zaupanja in stikom med ljudmi?
In this new and encouraging context, what action will the Council intend taking to support the efforts to bring about a comprehensive and lasting solution to the Cyprus problem in particular as regards using the financial assistance allocated to the Turkish Cypriot community on confidence-building measures and people-to-people contacts?
Kako lahko Evropska unija poenostavi in podpre Organizacijo združenih narodov ter udeleženi strani pri iskanju rešitve, ki bo temeljila na prejšnjih resolucijah Organizacije združenih narodov in temeljnih načelih EU ter bo privedla do umika vseh tujih enot z otoka in prenehanja vseh trgovinskih zapor za ladijski in/ali letalski promet, ki zadeva Ciper in/ali Turčijo?
In what way can the European Union facilitate and support the United Nations and the two sides in finding a solution, based on previous UN resolutions and on the fundamental principles of the EU, which will bring about withdrawal of all foreign troops from the island and termination of any embargoes on shipping and/or air travel involving either Cyprus or Turkey.
Kako lahko Svet pomaga zagotoviti, da se bo potem, ko se najde celovita rešitev, veljavnost pravnega reda Skupnosti kolikor je mogoče hitro razširila na ves otok in bodo vsi državljani Cipra sodelovali na volitvah v Evropski parlament leta 2009?
In what way can the Council assist, to make sure that once a comprehensive solution is found, the acquis is extended to all parts of the island, as expediently as possible, and all citizens of Cyprus will participate in the 2009 European Parliament elections?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0027/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0027/08
Kaj namerava glede na ta nov in spodbuden razvoj dogodkov ukreniti Komisija, da bi podprla prizadevanja za dosego celovite in trajne rešitve ciprskega vprašanja, zlasti v zvezi z uporabo dodeljene finančne pomoči skupnosti ciprskih Turkov, namenjene ukrepom za krepitev zaupanja in stikom med ljudmi?
In this new and encouraging context, what action will the Commission intend taking to support the efforts to bring about a comprehensive and lasting solution to the Cyprus problem in particular as regards using the financial assistance allocated to the Turkish Cypriot community on confidence-building measures and people-to-people contacts?
Kako lahko Komisija pomaga zagotoviti, da se bo potem, ko se najde celovita rešitev, veljavnost pravnega reda Skupnosti kolikor je mogoče hitro razširila na ves otok in bodo vsi državljani Cipra sodelovali na volitvah v Evropski parlament leta 2009?
In what way can the Commission assist, to make sure that once a comprehensive solution is found, the acquis is extended to all parts of the island, as expediently as possible, and all citizens of Cyprus will participate in the 2009 European Parliament elections?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0028/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0028/08
Zadeva: Hezbolah in seznam Evropske unije prepovedanih terorističnih organizacij
Subject: Hezbollah and the EU list of proscribed terrorist organisations
Januarja 2008 so teroristi sprožili dva raketna napada na Izrael z ozemlja pod jurisdikcijo misije UNIFIL, na kar se je odzval generalni sekretar ZN Ban Ki-Moon in napade označil kot „resno kršitev resolucije Varnostnega sveta 1701“.
During January 2008 terrorists from territory under UNIFIL's jurisdiction launched two rocket attacks on Israel, prompting UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon to call the attacks a 'serious violation of Security Council Resolution 1701'.
Cilj terorističnih napadov je bil tudi UNIFIL.
Terrorist groups targeted UNIFIL as well.
Poleg tega je Hezbolah, ki ga podpira Sirija, vpleten v val političnih umorov v Libanonu.
In addition, Hezbollah – supported by Syria – has been implicated in a wave of political assassinations in Lebanon.
Z državno podporo iz Sirije in Irana je Hezbolah postal država v državi, ki libanonskim demokratičnim institucijam onemogoča izvajanje njihovih političnih pristojnosti, tako kot v nedavnem primeru, ko je Hezbolah blokiral predsedniške volitve in zahteval takšno število sedežev v vladi, ki bi mu omogočalo veto.
With state support from Syria and Iran, Hezbollah has become a state within a state, blocking Lebanese democratic institutions from exercising their political powers, as in the latest case of blocking the presidential election and insisting on a veto-wielding number of cabinet seats.
Hezbolah tako libanonski vladi onemogoča polno izvajanje njene suverenosti.
Hezbollah effectively prevents the Lebanese Government from exercising its full sovereignty.
EU ni hotela označiti Hezbolaha za teroristično organizacijo, s čimer mu je odprla finančno delovanje v Evropi, ki je nujno za preživetje Hezbolaha v Libanonu.
The EU has refused to designate Hezbollah as a terrorist group, thus enabling Hezbollah's financial activities in Europe, which are necessary for its survival in Lebanon.
Z drugimi besedami: sredstva, ki jih Hezbolah zbere v Evropi, mu omogočajo, da ogroža politično in gospodarsko stabilnost Libanona, ovira mirovne pogovore na Bližnjem vzhodu ter spodkopava varnost Izraela in stabilizacijo Bližnjega vzhoda.
In other words, funds raised in Europe enable Hezbollah to threaten the political and economic stability of Lebanon, act against peace talks in the Middle East, undermine Israel's security, and fuel terrorism and destabilisation in the Middle East.
Hkrati Hezbolah uspešno širi svojo ideologijo med mladimi muslimani v Evropi, kar so potrdili mladi muslimani, ki so bili aretirani v Nemčiji.
In addition to all this, Hezbollah is successfully spreading its ideology among Muslim youth in Europe, as confirmed by Muslim youth arrested in Germany.
Hezbolah sodeluje z radikalnimi skupinami po vsem svetu in ima vedno tesnejše vezi z drugimi terorističnimi skupinami v Evropi.
Hezbollah cooperates with radical groups globally including increasing ties to other terrorist groups in Europe.
Evropa ogroža samo sebe s tem, da ne zavzame jasnega stališča proti Hezbolahu.
Europe is endangering itself by refusing to take a clear stand against Hezbollah.
Jasno je, da je razlikovanje med političnim in vojaškim krilom v najboljšem primeru umetno.
It is clear that at best the distinction between political and military wings is artificial.
Kot je komentiral Mohamed Faniš, politični vodja Hezbolaha: „Lahko zatrdim, da med vojaškimi in političnimi cilji Hezbolaha ni ločnice“.
As Muhammad Fannish, a Hezbollah political leader, commented: 'I can state that there is no separating between Hezbollah military and political aims'.
V zvezi z navedenimi dejstvi in ob priznanju resne zavezanosti EU v bližnjevzhodnem mirovnem procesu:
In light of all these facts and recognising the serious EU commitment to the Middle East peace process:
– Kaj namerava Svet storiti za ohranitev suverene demokracije in zakonite vlade v Libanonu ter kdaj?
– What action has the Council decided to take to defend Lebanon's sovereign democracy and legal government and when?
– Kako si Svet prizadeva preprečiti notranji konflikt in politične umore v Libanonu, ki vodijo v širši konflikt na Bližnjem vzhodu?
– What is the Council doing to prevent internal strife and political assassinations in Lebanon leading to a wider conflict in the Middle East?
– Kdaj namerava Svet označiti Hezbolah za prepovedano teroristično organizacijo?
– When does the Council plan to designate Hezbollah as a proscribed terrorist organisation?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0029/08/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0029/08/rev.1
Zadeva: Sporazum o svetovni prepovedi orožja, ki vsebuje uran
Subject: Global treaty to ban uranium weapons
Uporaba osiromašenega urana v boju nasprotuje osnovnim pravilom in načelom zapisanega in običajnega mednarodnega humanitarnega in okoljskega prava.
The use of Depleted Uranium in warfare runs counter to the basic rules and principles enshrined in written and customary International Humanitarian and Environmental Law.
Zato je novembra 2006 Evropski parlament okrepil svoje prejšnje pozive k moratoriju na orožje, ki vsebuje uran, s sprejetjem resolucije o „biološkem orožju in nehumanem konvencionalnem orožju“.
Therefore, in November 2006, the European Parliament strengthened its previous calls for a moratorium on uranium weapons by adopting its resolution on ‘biological weapons and inhumane conventional weapons’.
Po svetu obstaja čedalje večja podpora.
There is increasing support worldwide.