natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Abd al Rahim al Naširi, ki je že devet let v ameriškem priporu, sedaj pa ga pridržujejo v zaporu Guantanamo, trenutno trepeta za svoje življenje, saj bi mu utegnilo ameriško vojaško sodišče dosoditi smrtno kazen.
Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who has been for 9 years in US custody and is currently held in Guantanamo, is currently at risk of his life, as he could be sentenced to death by a US military commission.
Izjavil je, da so ga v letih 2002 in 2003 pridržali in mučili v skrivnem zaporu CIE na Poljskem, katerega domnevni obstoj je naveden tudi v Martyjevem in Favovem poročilu.
He has stated that in 2002-2003 he was held and tortured in a secret CIA prison in Poland, whose existence was also alleged by the Marty and Fava report.
Poljski državni tožilec je 27. oktobra 2010, podobno kot za Abu Zubajdo 20. januarja 2011, uradno priznal, da je al Naširi žrtev poljske preiskave skrivnih zaporov CIE.
On 27 October 2010, the Polish Public Prosecutor officially recognised al-Nashiri, after doing the same on 20 January 2011 for Abu Zubaydah, as a victim in Poland's investigation into secret CIA prisons.
Al Naširi se je 10. maja 2011 pritožil na Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice in zahteval, da sodišče poljski vladi naroči, naj posreduje pri ameriških oblasteh ter poskusi preprečiti, da bi tožilstvo pred vojaškim sodiščem zahtevalo smrtno kazen.
On 10 May 2011, al-Nashiri appealed to the ECHR, requesting the court to order the Polish Government to intervene with the US authorities in order to try to stop the military prosecution from seeking the death penalty.
Poljske oblasti so 24. maja tožilca Jerzyja Mierzewskega odstavile s primera domnevnega mučenja al Naširija in Abu Zubajde in se pri tem sklicevale na upravno reorganizacijo, njegovega neposrednega nadrejenega Roberta Majewskega pa odpustile.
On 24 May, the Polish authorities removed prosecutor Jerzy Mierzewski from the case of the alleged torture of al-Nashiri and of Abu Zubaydah, citing an ‘administrative reshuffle’, while his immediate superior Robert Majewski was dismissed.
Mediji so poročali, da so razmišljali o tem, da bi tožili člane takratne vlade, vključno z nekdanjim predsednikom vlade Leszekom Millerjem in nekdanjim predsednikom države Aleksandrom Kwasniewskim, saj naj bi kršila poljsko ustavo, zatiskala oči ob nezakonitem zapiranju številnih oseb ter sodelovala pri zločinih zoper človeštvo.
The media reported that they had been considering bringing charges against members of the government in power at that time, including former Prime Minister Leszek Miller and former President Aleksander Kwasniewski, for violating Poland’s Constitution, conniving in the illegal imprisonment of a number of people and participating in crimes against humanity.
Poljske oblasti so 3. junija sprožile preiskavo medijev zaradi izdaje državnih skrivnosti.
On 3 June, Polish authorities opened an investigation into the media for leaking state secrets.
Ali je Svet seznanjen z navedenimi dejstvi?
Is the Council aware of these facts?
S katerimi dejanji je izrazil, da EU v primeru al Naširija nasprotuje smrtni kazni?
What has it done to express the EU’s opposition to the death penalty in the case of Mr al-Nashiri?
Ali se strinja s tem, da bi morala EU pritisniti na poljske oblasti in zahtevati skupno posredovanje, da bi vse posameznike zaščitili pred smrtno kaznijo, mučenjem, samovoljnim pridržanjem in prisilnim izginotjem, med drugim tako, da bi preprečili blokado preiskav domnevnih kršitev človekovih pravic in odgovorne privedli pred sodišče?
Does it agree that the EU should put pressure on the Polish authorities to intervene jointly so as to protect all individuals against the death penalty, torture, arbitrary detention and enforced disappearance, inter alia by ensuring that inquiries into alleged human rights violations are not blocked and that those responsible are brought to justice?
Kako Svet zagotavlja, da se bo v Evropi dosegla pravica v primeru žrtev izrednih izročitev in programov skrivnega pridržanja CIE na Poljskem in v drugih državah članicah, tudi Romuniji in Litvi?
What is the Council doing to ensure that justice is done in Europe for victims of the CIA’s extraordinary rendition and secret detention programmes in Poland and other EU Member States, including Romania and Lithuania?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000233/2011
Question for oral answer O-000233/2011
Abd al Rahim al Naširi, ki je bil devet let v ameriškem priporu, sedaj pa ga pridržujejo v zaporu Guantanamo, trenutno tvega svoje življenje, saj bi mu utegnilo ameriško vojaško sodišče dosoditi smrtno kazen.
Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who has been for 9 years in US custody and is currently held in Guantanamo, is currently at risk of his life, as he could be sentenced to death by a US military commission.
Poljski državni tožilec je 27. oktobra 2010, podobno kot za Abu Zubajdo 20. januarja 2011, uradno priznal, da je al Naširi žrtev poljske preiskave skrivnih zaporov CIE.
On 27 October 2010, the Polish Public Prosecutor officially recognised al-Nashiri, after doing the same on 20 January 2011 for Abu Zubaydah, as a victim in Poland’s investigation into secret CIA prisons.
Ali je Komisija seznanjena z navedenimi dejstvi?
Is the Commission aware of these facts?
S katerimi dejanji je izrazila, da EU v primeru al Naširija nasprotuje smrtni kazni?
What has it done to express the EU’s opposition to the death penalty in the case of Mr al-Nashiri?
Kako Komisija zagotavlja, da se bo v Evropi dosegla pravica v primeru žrtev izrednih izročitev in programov skrivnega pridržanja CIE na Poljskem in v drugih državah članicah, tudi Romuniji in Litvi?
What is the Commission doing to ensure that justice is done in Europe for victims of the CIA’s extraordinary rendition and secret detention programmes in Poland and other EU Member States, including Romania and Lithuania?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000234/2011
Question for oral answer O-000234/2011
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Pridružitev Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Entry of Bulgaria and Romania into the Schengen Area
Ali lahko Svet, zaradi dvomov, ki so jih izrazile nekatere države članice, in glede na uradna nasprotovanja drugih držav glede pridružitve Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju med zasedanjem Sveta za notranje zadeve 22. septembra 2011, razloži, kateri bodo naslednji koraki in katero strategijo namerava uporabiti za to vprašanje?
Following the doubts raised by some Member States, and the formal objections made by others during the Home Affairs Council on 22 September 2011, over the entry of Bulgaria and Romania into the Schengen Area, can the Council state what it will do next and what strategy it will adopt on this matter?
Ali Svet lahko potrdi, da bo lahko spodbudil uporabo vsakega ukrepa, potrebnega za zagotovitev učinkovite in varne krepitve zunanjih meja?
Can the Council confirm that it will encourage the use of all necessary measures to ensure that the external borders are strengthened as efficiently and securely as possible?
Ali lahko Svet razloži, na kakšen način namerava doseči ta cilj?
Can it explain how it intends to do this?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000235/2011
Question for oral answer O-000235/2011
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Pridružitev Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Entry of Bulgaria and Romania to the Schengen Area
Ali lahko Komisija, zaradi dvomov, ki so jih izrazile nekatere države članice, in glede na uradna nasprotovanja drugih držav glede pridružitve Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju med zasedanjem Sveta za notranje zadeve 22. septembra 2011, razloži, kateri bodo naslednji koraki in katero strategijo namerava uporabiti za to vprašanje?
Following the doubts raised by some Member States, and the formal objections made by others, during the Home Affairs Council on 22 September 2011, over the entry of Bulgaria and Romania into the Schengen Area, can the Commission state what it will do next and what strategy it will adopt on this matter?
Ali Komisija lahko potrdi, da bo lahko spodbudila uporabo vsakega ukrepa, potrebnega za zagotovitev učinkovite in varne krepitve zunanjih meja?
Can the Commission confirm that it will encourage the use of all necessary measures to ensure that the external borders are strengthened as efficiently and securely as possible?
Ali lahko Komisija razloži, na kakšen način namerava doseči ta cilj?
Can it explain how it intends to do this?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000236/2011
Question for oral answer O-000236/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Pravice Romov v EU - spoprijemanje s sovraštvom do Romov
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Roma rights in the EU - tackling anti-Gypsyism
Okvir EU za nacionalne romske strategije je bil predstavljen aprila 2011, maja ga je Svet v svojih sklepih pozdravil, Evropski svet pa ga je potrdil 24. junija.
The EU Framework for National Roma Strategies was presented in April 2011, welcomed in Council Conclusions in May and endorsed by the European Council on 24 June.
Države članice morajo vzporedno s cilji EU 2020 oblikovati strategije za vključitev Romov ter jih do konca leta 2011 predložiti Komisiji.
Member States are to develop national Roma integration strategies in parallel with the EU 2020 objectives and submit these to the Commission by the end of 2011.
Čeprav je okvir EU za nacionalne romske strategije med dokumenti, ki jih je Komisija pripravila za izboljšanje socialno-ekonomske vključenosti 10–12 milijonov evropskih Romov, najnaprednejši, v njem ni protidiskriminacijskih ciljev in ukrepov za boj proti sovraštvu do Romov, ki so danes bolj potrebni kot kdajkoli prej.
Although the EU Framework for National Roma Strategies is the most advanced document produced by the Commission concerning improving the socio–economic inclusion of the 10-12 million European Roma, it lacks anti-discrimination targets and measures against anti-Gypsyism, which are needed now more than ever.
Priča smo nenehnemu porastu nestrpnosti (sovraštva proti Romom) in naraščanju fizičnega nasilja nad Romi, kar se v zadnjem času dogaja v številnih državah članicah EU.
We continue to witness growing anti-Roma sentiment (Anti-Gypsyism) and increased levels of physical violence directed towards the Roma, as has recently happened in a number of EU Member States.
Pogosto so storilci v rasističnih napadih, usmerjenih proti Romom in romskim soseskam, rasistične skupine, nogometni navijači, neonacisti in skrajnodesničarske skupine.
Racist groups, football fans, neo-nazi and far right groups are very often identified as perpetrators of racist attacks against Roma and their neighborhoods.
Katere ukrepe bo glede na navedeno Svet sprejel, da bi zaščitil pravice in svoboščine Romov kot evropskih državljanov?
Given the above facts, what measures is the Council taking to defend the rights and freedoms of Roma as European citizens?
Katere ukrepe je sprejel, da bi vlade pripravil do tega, da ustrezno ukrepajo proti vsaki obliki nasilja nad Romi in zagotovijo spoštovanje pravne države tudi takrat, ko so žrtve Romi?
What steps have been taken by the Council to pressure governments to act sufficiently against any form of violence against Roma and with respect for the rule of law when Roma appear as victims?
Kako si Svet prizadeva olajšati postopek priprave nacionalnih romskih strategij v državah članicah EU?
What is the Council doing to facilitate the EU Member States in the process of developing their own national Roma strategies?
Kakšni ukrepi so bili sprejeti za odpravo primerov protiromske politike, kot so ponavljajoči se izgoni Romov?
What action has been taken to overcome incidences of anti-Roma policies such as those of continuous expulsions of Roma?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000237/2011
Question for oral answer O-000237/2011
Čeprav je okvir EU za nacionalne romske strategije med dokumenti, ki jih je Evropska komisija pripravila za izboljšanje socialno-ekonomske vključenosti 10–12 milijonov evropskih Romov, najnaprednejši, v njem ni protidiskriminacijskih ciljev in ukrepov za boj proti sovraštvu do Romov, ki so danes bolj potrebni kot kdajkoli prej.
Although the EU Framework for National Roma Strategies is the most advanced document produced by the European Commission concerning improving the socio–economic inclusion of the 10-12 million European Roma, it lacks anti-discrimination targets and measures against anti-Gypsyism, which are needed now more than ever.
Pogosto so storilci v rasističnih napadih, usmerjenih proti Romom in romskim soseskam, rasistične skupine, nogometni navijači, neonacisti in skrajnodesničarske skupine.
Racist groups, football fans, neo-nazi and far right groups are very often identified as perpetrators of racist attacks against Roma and their neighbourhoods.
Katere ukrepe bo glede na navedeno Komisija sprejela, da bi zaščitila pravice in svoboščine Romov kot evropskih državljanov?
Given the above facts, what measures is the Commission taking to defend the rights and freedoms of Roma as European citizens?
Katere ukrepe je sprejela, da bi vlade pripravila do tega, da ustrezno ukrepajo proti vsaki obliki nasilja nad Romi in zagotovijo spoštovanje pravne države tudi takrat, ko so žrtve Romi?
What steps have been taken by the Commission to pressure governments to act sufficiently against any form of violence against Roma and with respect for the rule of law when Roma appear as victims?
Kako si Komisija prizadeva olajšati postopek priprave nacionalnih romskih strategij v državah članicah EU?
What is the Commission doing to facilitate the EU Member States in the process of developing their own national Roma strategies?
Kolikšno vrednost pripisuje Komisija mnenju Romov, ko obravnava politike, ki se nanašajo nanje, saj opažamo, da sta udeležba in zastopanost Romov na srečanjih platforme EU nezadostna?
What value does the Commission place on the views of the Roma when it comes to Roma-related policies, as we note that Roma participation and representation at EU Platform meetings is scarce?
Kakšni ukrepi so bili sprejeti za odpravo primerov protiromske politike, kot so ponavljajoči se izgoni Romov?
What action has been taken to overcome traces of anti-Roma policies such as those of continuous expulsions of Roma?
Kakšne ukrepe v zvezi s pravicami Romov bo Komisija sprejela do julija 2014?
What action will the Commission be taking before July 2014 regarding Roma rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000238/2011
Question for oral answer O-000238/2011
Po mnenju visokega komisarja Združenih narodov za begunce ter drugih organizacij je ponovna naselitev beguncev miroljubna, urejena in trajna rešitev za najranljivejše begunce, ki so že dlje časa pregnani s svojih domov.
Resettlement of refugees is usually considered, by the United Nations' High Commissioner for Refugees among others, as the peaceful, orderly and durable solution for the most vulnerable of the refugees in protracted situations.
Evropska unija je sklenila, da bo okrepila Evropski sklad za begunce in sprejela trajnosten evropski program za begunce.
The European Union has decided to reinforce its European Refugee Fund and to adopt a sustainable European refugee programme.
Maja 2010 je Evropski parlament v postopku soodločanja sprejel poročilo o Evropskem skladu za begunce.
In May 2010 the European Parliament adopted a codecision report on the European Refugee Fund.
Svet tega postopka soodločanja ni zaključil, domnevno zaradi razhajanj glede uporabe člena 290 PDEU (delegirani akti) pri izbiri prednostnih regij za ukrepe EU.
This codecision has not been finished by the Council, reportedly because of divergences on the use of Article 290 TFEU (delegated acts) on the choice of priority regions for EU action.
Junija 2011 je Svet neformalno predlagal rešitev, in sicer delno soodločanje namesto delegiranih aktov za izbiro prednostnih regij.
In June 2011, the Council informally proposed a solution that consisted in the use of a partial codecision rather than delegated acts for the choice of priority regions.
Evropski parlament je v istem mesecu podal nasprotni predlog, v katerem je predviden celotni postopek soodločanja.
The European Parliament responded in the same month with a counter-proposal that envisages a full codecision procedure.
Odtlej od Sveta še ni prejel odgovora.
There has been no answer from the Council since then.
Zaradi neuspešnega soodločanja o tej temi sta že izgubljeni dve leti za ponovno naselitev v EU in če do konca leta 2011 ne najdemo rešitve, bo zagotovo ogrožena načrtovana poraba sredstev iz Evropskega sklada za begunce, ki zapade leta 2013.
The failure to codecide on this file has already made us waste two years of resettlement in the EU and, if we do not find a solution before the end of 2011, it will definitely jeopardise the planned use of the European Refugee Fund, which lapses in 2013.
Države članice ne bodo dobile dodatnih sredstev iz Evropskega sklada za begunce.
Member States will not receive the extra funds allocated by the European Refugee Fund.
Begunci bodo še naprej čakali v taboriščih, ponekod pa bodo lahek plen za mreže, ki trgujejo z ljudmi.
Refugees will still be waiting in camps and in some cases provide fodder for the human trafficking networks.
Mehanizem za izredne razmere, ki ga to soodločanje predvideva in bi ga že lahko uporabili v arabski pomladi, še ne deluje, zaradi česar je najbrž že prišlo do smrtnih žrtev.
The emergency mechanism provided for in this codecision and that we could have already used in the context of the Arab Spring is still inoperative, which has probably already resulted in loss of lives.
Kdaj bo Svet podal odgovor na to temo?
When will the Council give an answer on this file?
Ali sta Evropski sklad za begunce in ponovna naselitev na dnevnih redih prihodnjih sej Sveta?
Are the ERF and resettlement part of the upcoming agenda of Council meetings?
Ali je Svet izračunal, kakšne posledice ima za ljudi nedejavnost EU?
Has the Council calculated the human consequences of the EU's inaction?
Ali se je Svet pripravljen pospešeno pogajati s Parlamentom, da bi se zaključil postopek soodločanja o tej temi?
Is the Council ready to enter fast-track negotiations with the Parliament in order to finish the codecision on this file?
Ali lahko predlaga bodisi kompromis bodisi drugo rešitev za zagon programa za ponovno naselitev?
Can the Council propose any compromise or solution to start the resettlement programme?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000239/2011
Question for oral answer O-000239/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Neravnovesja v verigi preskrbe s hrano
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Imbalances in the food supply chain
To ogroža obstoj mnogih kmetij in ima resne posledice za verigo preskrbe s hrano v EU ter bo še zaostrilo problem trgovinskih bilanc, saj bo treba več uvažati in bomo bolj odvisni od nestabilnih tujih trgov.
This threatens the survival of many farms, has serious implications for the food supply chain in the EU and will exacerbate the problem of trade balances, with a need for more imports and dependence on volatile foreign markets.
Proizvajalci naj bi imeli manj pogajalske moči predvsem zaradi vse večjega vpliva skupin velikih trgovcev, kar pomeni, da se kmetijske surovine od proizvajalcev odkupujejo po nizkih cenah, medtem ko potrošniki za živila plačujejo visoke cene.
The growing power of large retail groups in particular is perceived to result in reduced bargaining power for producers, meaning that low prices are paid to producers for agricultural raw materials while high prices are paid by consumers for foodstuffs.
Katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija v zvezi z naslednjimi najpomembnejšimi izzivi, in sicer je treba:
In this context what action does the Commission envisage with respect to the following key challenges?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000240/2011
Question for oral answer O-000240/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Patenti za rastline in živali iz konvencionalne pridelave
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Patents for plants and animals derived from conventional breeding
Iz več poročil je razvidno, da se v Evropi povečuje število zahtev pri Evropskem patentnem uradu za podelitev patenta za rastline iz konvencionalne pridelave.
Several reports show that Europe is seeing a growing trend in the number of applications to the European Patent Office (EPO) for patents on plants derived from conventional breeding.
Leta 2010 je razširjeni odbor za pritožbe Evropskega patentnega urada na podlagi predhodnih primerov odločil, da ni mogoče patentirati metod za konvencionalno pridelavo rastlin (G2/07 in G1/08).
In 2010, the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal decided, based on precedent cases, that methods used for conventionally breeding plants are not patentable (G2/07 and G1/08).
Patentni zadevi, o katerih je tekla razprava pri tej odločitvi, sta bila patent za brokoli (EP1069819) in paradižnik (EP1211926) iz konvencionalne pridelave.
The patent cases under discussion in this decision were a patent on broccoli (EP1069819) and on tomatoes (EP1211926), both derived from conventional breeding.
Patent se je zahteval za postopek pridelave, pa tudi za semena, rastline in užitne dele rastlin.
These patents claimed the process for breeding as well as the seeds, plants and edible parts of the plants.
V zadevi G1/08 je Evropski patentni urad odločil, da je treba postopek pridelave obravnavati kot „v bistvu biološkega“ in ga zato ni mogoče patentirati zaradi člena 53b Evropske patentne konvencije in člena 4(b) direktive Evropske unije št. 98/44/ES, ki izključujeta patentiranje „postopkov za vzgojo rastlin in živali, ki so v bistvu biološki“.
In G1/08, the EPO decided that the process for breeding had to be regarded as ‘essentially biological’ and therefore could not be patented because of Article 53b of the European Patent Convention (EPC) and Article 4(b) of EU Directive 98/44/EC, which exclude patents on ‘essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals’.
Vendar ta odločitev ne rešuje pravnih vprašanj ali osnovnih problemov pri konvencionalni pridelavi.
However, this decision does not solve the legal questions or the underlying problems regarding conventional breeding.
Tako je na primer Evropski patentni urad maja 2011 podelil dodatni patent za melone iz konvencionalne pridelave (EP 1 962 578).
For example in May 2011, the EPO granted a further patent on melons derived from conventional breeding (EP 1 962 578).
Proizvodi, kot so rastline in sadje, so bili obravnavani kot izum.
The products such as plants and fruits were regarded as an invention.
Razlaga evropske patentne zakonodaje kaže, da bi bilo mogoče konvencionalno („v bistvu biološko“) pridelavo patentirati, čeprav je bil postopek pridelave izključen.
This interpretation of European patent law implies that conventional, (‘essentially biological’), breeding would be patentable, even if the process for breeding was excluded.
Pozivamo Komisijo, naj odločno opozori, da v Evropi ni mogoče patentirati rastlin in živali iz konvencionalne pridelave.
We call on the Commission to send a strong signal that plants and animals derived from conventional breeding cannot be patented in Europe.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je sedanja praksa Evropskega patentnega urada v nasprotju s smislom člena 4(b) direktive Evropske unije 98/44/ES?
Does the Commission agree that the current practice of the EPO is in contradiction with the meaning of Article 4(b) of EU Directive 98/44/EC?
Če se Komisija strinja, katere ukrepe bo uvedla na tem področju, da bi Evropskemu patentnemu urada preprečila podeljevanje teh patentov na podlagi direktive EU 98/44/ES?
In the event that the Commission agrees, what actions and measures will the Commission take in this regard to stop the EPO granting these patents on the basis of EU Directive 98/44/EC?
Če se Komisija ne strinja, ali načrtuje kako pobudo, s katero bi v evropsko patentno zakonodajo uvedla potrebna pojasnila, s katerimi bo preprečila podeljevanje patentov za rastline in živali iz konvencionalne pridelave?
In the event that the Commission does not agree, does the Commission plan any initiative to introduce necessary clarification into European Patent law to make sure that patents on plants and animals derived from conventional breeding cannot be granted?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000241/2011
Question for oral answer O-000241/2011