natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kakšne konkretne ukrepe namerava Svet sprejeti, da bi zagotovil jasno povezavo med programi za boj proti revščini ter politikami in strategijami za boj proti podnebnim spremembam v državah v razvoju?
What specific actions does the Council intend to take to ensure clear links between poverty reduction programmes and climate change policies and strategies in developing countries?
Večina sicer omejenih sredstev za boj proti podnebnim spremembam prihaja iz proračuna za uradno razvojno pomoč, torej se v ta namen preusmerjajo sredstva, predvidena za razvoj, zaradi česar razvojni cilji tisočletja morda ne bodo doseženi.
Most of the scarce resources for climate change come from ODA budgets, which has led to siphoning off funds from development assistance, thus jeopardising the attainment of the MDGs.
Kakšne nove mehanizme načrtuje Svet, da bi zbral dodatna sredstva za boj proti podnebnim spremembam v državah v razvoju in zagotovil, da se bo evropski razvojni sklad uporabljal izključno za razvojno pomoč?
What new mechanisms would the Council adopt to raise additional resources to combat climate change in developing countries and to ensure that the European Development Fund is solely used for development assistance?
Kolikšen delež pričakovanih prihodkov od dražb v sistemu EU za trgovanje z emisijami je Svet pripravljen nameniti za prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam v državah v razvoju?
What percentage of the expected revenues from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme auctioning is the Council ready to earmark for climate change adaptation in developing countries?
Kateri so najboljši mehanizmi za usmerjanje teh sredstev, tako da bi se spodbujala odgovornost v državah prejemnicah?
What are the best mechanisms to channel these resources so that they promote ownership in recipient countries?
Sredstva za prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam na evropski ravni se dodeljujejo na številne načine, kar povzroča precejšnje težave tistim, ki so odgovorni za njihovo izvrševanje.
Adaptation resources at European level are channelled through a highly fragmented landscape, posing significant challenges for those tasked with implementation of the funding.
Ali Svet namerava spodbuditi uskladitev številnih mehanizmov financiranja, ki že obstajajo na evropski ravni?
How will the Council promote coordination between the numerous financing instruments that exist at European level?
Kakšni ukrepi so predvideni za to, da bo Globalno zavezništvo proti podnebnim spremembam (GCCA) postalo klirinška hiša za sredstva za prilagajanje v državah v razvoju, s čimer se bo mogoče izogniti novim dvostranskim pobudam EU?
What measures are envisaged to ensure that the GCCA becomes a clearing house for adaptation funding in developing countries, thus avoiding the creation of new EU bilateral initiatives?
In nazadnje, ali bi bil Svet pripravljen v večstranskem okviru konference v Københavnu podpreti oblikovanje mednarodnega davka na finančne transakcije po vzoru "Tobinovega davka", da bi tako prispevali k financiranju tega prilagajanja?
Finally, will the Council, in the multilateral context of the Copenhagen Conference, be prepared to support the creation of an international tax on financial transactions, based on the principle of a 'Tobin tax', in order to help fund these adaptations?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0091/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0091/09
Kakšne konkretne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bi zagotovila jasno povezavo med programi za boj proti revščini ter politikami in strategijami za boj proti podnebnim spremembam v državah v razvoju?
What specific actions does the Commission intend to take to ensure clear links between poverty reduction programmes and climate change policies and strategies in developing countries?
Kakšne nove mehanizme načrtuje Komisija, da bi zbrala dodatna sredstva za boj proti podnebnim spremembam v državah v razvoju in zagotovila, da se bo evropski razvojni sklad uporabljal izključno za razvojno pomoč?
What new mechanisms would the Commission adopt to raise additional resources to combat climate change in developing countries and to ensure that the European Development Fund is solely used for development assistance?
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi, da bo za financiranje lajšanja vpliva podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanja nanje v državah v razvoju oblikovala konkretno ponudbo, ki bo primerna in predvidljiva, namesto da čaka z njo do Københavna?
Can the Commission guarantee to come up with a concrete offer to finance developing countries' mitigation of and adaptation to climate change which is adequate and predictable rather than holding back the offer until Copenhagen?
Kolikšen delež pričakovanih prihodkov od dražb v sistemu EU za trgovanje z emisijami je Komisija pripravljena nameniti za prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam v državah v razvoju?
What percentage of the expected revenues from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme auctioning is the Commission ready to earmark for climate change adaptation in developing countries?
Kateri so najboljši mehanizmi za usmerjanje teh sredstev, tako da bi se spodbudila odgovornost v državah prejemnicah?
What are the best mechanisms to channel these resources so that they promote ownership in recipient countries?
Kako namerava Komisija spodbujati usklajevanje številnih finančnih instrumentov, ki že obstajajo na evropski ravni?
How will the Commission promote coordination between the numerous financing instruments that exist at European level?
In nazadnje, ali bi bila Komisija pripravljena v večstranskem okviru konference v Københavnu podpreti oblikovanje mednarodnega davka na finančne transakcije po vzoru "Tobinovega davka", da bi tako prispevali k financiranju tega prilagajanja?
Finally, will the Commission, in the multilateral context of the Copenhagen Conference, be prepared to support the creation of an international tax on financial transactions, based on the principle of a 'Tobin tax', in order to help fund these adaptations?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0092/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0092/09
Zadeva: Poročilo o uporabi uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2157/2001 z dne 8. oktobra 2001 o statutu evropske družbe (SE)
Subject: Report on the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European company (SE)
ob upoštevanju uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2157/200 1 z dne 8. oktobra 2001 o statutu evropske družbe (SE),
Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European company (SE),
ob upoštevanju uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1435/2003 z dne 22. julija 2003 o statutu Evropske zadruge (SCE),
Council Regulation (EC) No 1435/2003 of 22 July 2003 on the Statute for a European Cooperative Society (SCE),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2005/56/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o čezmejnih združitvah kapitalskih družb,
Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies,
ker člen 69 uredbe o statutu evropske družbe zavezuje Komisijo, da najpozneje pet let po datumu začetka veljavnosti te uredbe Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu posreduje poročilo o uporabi uredbe in po potrebi predloge sprememb,
Article 69 of the SE regulation commits the Commission, five years at the latest after the entry into force of this regulation, to forward to the Council and the European Parliament a report on the application of the regulation and proposals for amendments, where appropriate,
ker je med nalogami Komisije, da preuči, ali je primerno dovoliti, da ima evropska družba registrirani sedež in dejanski sedež v različnih državah članicah,
the Commission is called upon to analyse, among other points, the appropriateness of allowing an SE’s head office and registered office to be located in different Member States,
ker je uredba o statutu evropske družbe pričela veljati 8. oktobra 2004:
the SE regulation entered into force on 8 October 2004,
Kako napreduje delo Komisije glede preučevanja vprašanj iz člena 69 uredbe o statutu evropske družbe in glede priprave zahtevanega poročila?
What is the current state of advancement of the Commission’s work on analysing the questions raised in Article 69 of the SE Regulation and on preparing the requested report?
Kdaj namerava Komisija predstaviti svoje ugotovitve in poročilo?
When does the Commission plan to present its results and the report?
Kakšen časovni razpored je pripravila Komisija za nadaljnje ukrepanje v skladu z opravljeno analizo?
What is the Commission’s timetable for further action arising from the analysis?
UL L 294 z dne 10.11.2001, str.
OJ L 294, 10.11.2001, p.
UL L 207 z dne 18.8.2003, str.
OJ L 207, 18.8.2003, p.
UL L 310 z dne 25.11.2005, str.
OJ L 310, 25.11.2005, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0093/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0093/09
, v imenu Odbora za zunanje zadeve ,
, on behalf of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ,
Zadeva: Gradnja demokracije v zunanjih odnosih
Subject: Democracy building in external relations
19. maja 2009 je Svet za zunanje odnose priznal, da podpora demokratičnemu upravljanju v partnerskih državah vključuje širša vprašanja demokracije in človekovih pravic, ter ugotovil, da je mogoče pozvati k skladnejšemu pristopu EU, da se poveča učinkovitost njene podpore.
On 19 May 2009, the External Relations Council recognised that support for democratic governance in partner countries involves broader democracy and human rights issues and noted that a more coherent EU approach may be called for to increase the effectiveness of EU support.
Kot je predsedstvo že poudarilo, doslej ni bilo dovolj prizadevanj, da bi uskladili številne evropske instrumente za podporo demokraciji in ukrepe v mednarodnih forumih ali skladih, ki se ukvarjajo s spodbujanjem demokracije.
As already outlined by the Presidency, there has so far been insufficient effort to coordinate the numerous European instruments to support democracy and to coordinate action in international fora or funds that deal with the promotion of democracy.
Katere specifične ukrepe predlaga predsedstvo, da bi se izboljšalo usklajevanje instrumentov zunanje politike, politike človekovih pravic in razvojne politike EU, ob upoštevanju, da so demokracija in človekove pravice medsebojno povezane?
What specific actions is the Presidency proposing in order to improve coordination of the EU foreign, human rights and development policy instruments, acknowledging that democracy and human rights are interlinked?
Kateri ukrepi so predvideni za zagotavljanje dosledne povolilne politike, kjer bi bila podpora razvoju skladna z demokratičnimi načeli in vrednotami demokratičnega upravljanja?
What measures are foreseen to ensure a coherent post-electoral policy, where development support is consistent with democratic principles and democratic governance values?
Ali bi lahko to imelo neposredne posledice za načrtovanje razvojne pomoči EU?
Could this have direct consequences on the programming of EU development aid?
Kakšna vloga bo namenjena parlamentom – tudi Evropskemu parlamentu – v tem procesu gradnje demokracije in spodbujanja človekovih pravic?
What role will be given to the parliaments, including the European Parliament, in this democracy building and human rights promotion process?
Ali bo posledica tega podpiranje demokratičnih institucij, zlasti parlamentov, z njihovim vključevanjem v pripravo in izvajanje državam prilagojenih instrumentov, kot so sporazumi med EU in zadevnimi državami ter strateški dokumenti držav?
Will this entail supporting democratic institutions, particularly parliaments, by involving them in the preparation and implementation of country-specific instruments such as agreements between the EU and the country concerned and Country Strategy Papers?
Ali predsedstvo soglaša, da se je treba lotiti podrobne in celovite analize podpore demokraciji in spodbujanja človekovih pravic?
Does the Presidency agree that a detailed and comprehensive analysis of democracy support and human rights promotion needs to be undertaken?
Ali bo predsedstvo podrobno predstavilo, kakšna posvetovanja so bila opravljena z vsemi partnerji (t. j. institucijami in regionalnimi akterji) in kakšne sklepe lahko potegne iz tega?
Will the Presidency set out exactly what consultation has taken place with all partners (i.e. institutions and regional actors) and what conclusions it can draw from this?
Ali Svet lahko zagotovi, da bo sklepe o tej pobudi sprejel šele, ko bo opravljenih dovolj posvetovanj s partnerji?
Can the Council guarantee it will only adopt conclusions on this initiative once sufficient partner consultation has taken place?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0094/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0094/09
Zadeva: Ukrepi EU za podporo enakosti med spoloma pri usklajevanju pravic in dolžnosti, povezanih z delom in družinskim življenjem
Subject: EU measures to support gender equality in balancing work and family rights and responsibilities
Komisija je 3. oktobra pripravila dva zakonodajna predloga za boljše usklajevanje poklicnega, zasebnega in družinskega življenja, tako v zvezi s porodniškim dopustom kot s položajem samozaposlenih žensk in zakoncev, ki jim pomagajo pri izvajanju dejavnosti.
On 3 October 2008 the Commission presented two proposals for legislation to improve the reconciliation of work, family and private life, in relation both to maternity leave and the situation of self-employed women and assisting spouses.
Ta „uskladitveni paket“ je spremljalo poročilo o pregledu stanja v zvezi z zagotavljanjem otroškega varstva v EU in sporočilo o politiki, v katerem je Komisija napovedala, da bo z ustreznimi ukrepi dosegla, da bo sporazum socialnih partnerjev o starševskem dopustu v obliki predloga direktive pravno zavezujoč.
This ‘reconciliation package’ was accompanied by a stocktaking report on the provision of childcare in the EU and by a policy communication in which the Commission announced that it would take the necessary action to give legal force to a social partners' agreement on parental leave in the form of a proposal for a directive.
Junija 2009 so socialni partnerji dosegli sporazum o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu o starševskem dopustu, ki ga bo konec novembra Svet uradno potrdil.
In June 2009 social partners reached an agreement on a revised Framework Agreement on parental leave which is now to be formally approved by the Council at the end of November.
Evropska komisija je v svojem delovnem programu za leto 2009 predvidela tudi predlog direktive o očetovskem in posvojiteljskem dopustu ter dopustu za nego staršev.
In its Work Programme for 2009, the Commission had also envisaged making a proposal for a directive providing for paternity, adoption and filial leave.
Ta predlog na koncu ni bil sprejet, torej v letu 2009 ne bo predložen.
This proposal, in the end, was not put forward and will not be presented for the year 2009.
Kakšno je stališče Sveta o morebitni novi evropski zakonodaji o starševskem in posvojiteljskem dopustu ter dopustu za nego staršev?
What is the Council's view on possible new European legislation on paternity, filial and adoption leave?
Kakšno je stališče Sveta o potekajoči razpravi o predlogih Komisije za direktivi o samozaposlenih ženskah in porodniškem dopustu?
What is the Council's view on the ongoing discussion of the two Commission proposals for directives on ‘female self-employed’ and ‘maternity leave’?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0095/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0095/09
Junija 2009 so socialni partnerji dosegli sporazum o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu o starševskem dopustu, ki sedaj čaka na uradno potrditev Sveta konec novembra.
In June 2009 social partners reached an agreement on a revised Framework Agreement on parental leave which is now to be formally approved by the Council at the end of November.
Bo Komisija popolnoma opustila ta zakonodajni predlog o očetovskem in posvojiteljskem dopustu ter dopustu za nego staršev, ali ga bo naslednja Komisija ponovno predložila?
Will the Commission definitely abandon these new legislative proposals on paternity leave, adoption leave and filial leave or will be put forward again by the next Commission?
Namerava Komisija v kratkem začeti učinkovit dialog o tem z Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom?
Does the Commission intend shortly to enter into an effective dialogue with the European Parliament and Council in this respect?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0096/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0096/09
Zadeva: Mednarodni dan boja proti nasilju nad ženskami
Subject: International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women
Ob desetletnici resolucije Združenih narodov, s katero so ustvarili mednarodni dan boja proti nasilju nad ženskami, je treba okrepiti in nadgraditi delovanje EU na tem področju.
In the context of commemoration of the 10th anniversary of the UN Resolution establishing the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, EU action in this field needs to be stepped up and move forward.
Nasilje nad ženskami je v vsej Evropi razširjen strukturni problem.
Violence against women is a structural and widespread problem throughout Europe.
Življenje žensk in njihovo udejstvovanje v družbenem, političnem in ekonomskem življenju omejujejo različne oblike nasilja nad njimi.
Women's lives and participation in social, economic, political and economic life is being limited by the persistence of different forms of violence against them.
Nasilje nad ženskami ni le težava javnega zdravja, pač pa tudi vprašanje neenakosti med ženskami in moškimi, na tem področju pa EU lahko ukrepa.
Violence against women is not only a problem of public health, but also a matter of inequality between women and men, which is an area where the EU has the mandate to develop actions.
V času, ko EU povečuje svoje sodelovanje na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice z decembrskim sprejetjem tako imenovanega stockholmskega programa, v katerem sta poudarjena zaščita državljanov in dostop do sodišč ter ki promovira državljanske pravice, bi moralo biti okrepljeno spopadanje z nasiljem nad ženskami sestavni del tovrstne strategije.
At a moment when the EU is increasing its cooperation in the field of Freedom, Security and Justice, through the adoption in December of the so-called 'Stockholm programme' , which highlights protection of citizens, access to justice and promoting citizens’ rights, stepping up EU action to tackle violence against women must be an integral part of such a strategy.
Kakšna je torej strategija Sveta, da bi se razmere izboljšale?
What is, therefore, the Council's strategy to improve the current situation?
Ali namerava Svet sprejeti obsežnejšo politiko EU za boj proti nasilju nad ženskami na podlagi veljavnih določb Pogodbe (obveznost delovanja za enakost med moškimi in ženskami ter javno zdravje)?
Does the Council plan to adopt a more comprehensive EU policy to tackle violence against women on the basis of the existing Treaty provisions (obligation to work towards equality between women and men and public health)?
Ali namerava Svet pripraviti evropski načrt politike za boj proti nasilju nad ženskami, ki bi temeljil na skupnih smernicah?
Does the Council plan to develop an EU policy plan to tackle violence against women based on shared guidelines?
Kateri ukrepi so načrtovani, da bi države članice spodbudili k oblikovanju nacionalnih akcijskih načrtov za boj proti nasilju nad ženskami in jih pri tem podprli?
What actions are planned to encourage and support Member States in developing national action plans to tackle violence against women?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0097/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0097/09
V času, ko EU povečuje svoje sodelovanje na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice z decembrskim sprejetjem tako imenovanega stockholmskega programa, v katerem sta poudarjena zaščita državljanov in dostop do sodišč ter ki promovira državljanske pravice, bi moralo biti okrepljeno spopadanje z nasiljem nad ženskami sestavni del tovrstne strategije.
At a moment when the EU is increasing its cooperation in the field of Freedom, Security and Justice, through the adoption in December of the so-called 'Stockholm programme' , which highlights protection of citizens, access to justice and promoting citizens’ rights, stepping up EU action against violence against women must be an integral part of such a strategy.
Ali namerava Komisija vložiti predlog smernic za Svet, da bi dosegli bolj usklajen evropski načrt politike za boj proti nasilju nad ženskami?
Does the Commission plan to put to the Council proposals for guidelines for a more coherent EU policy plan to tackle violence against women?
Kaj Komisija meni o organizaciji posebne konference na visoki ravni, na kateri bi sodelovali predstavniki političnih organov, civilne družbe, socialnih in institucionalnih organizacij, da bi prispevali k razvojnemu procesu za bolj usklajene politike proti nasilju nad ženskami?
What does the Commission think about organising a special high-level conference attended by representatives coming from political bodies, civil society and social and institutional organisations, with the aim of feeding into a process of developing more coherent policies to address violence against women?
Kdaj namerava Komisija pripraviti evropsko leto proti nasilju nad ženskami, k čemur Parlament nenehno poziva že od leta 1997?
When does the Commission intend to organise a European Year against Violence against Women as repeatedly called for by the EP since 1997?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0098/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0098/09
Zadeva: Strategija Sveta za konferenco o spremembi podnebja v Københavnu (COP 15)
Subject: Council's strategy for the Copenhagen Conference on Climate Change (COP 15)
S kakšno strategijo bo Svet zagotovil, da razvite države in tiste v razvoju, ki se bodo udeležile konference o spremembi podnebja v Københavnu, tam dosežejo velikopotezen sporazum?
What is the Council's strategy to ensure that both developed and developing Parties to the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference reach an ambitious agreement?
Kako bo Svet dosegel, da bodo v sporazumu določeni zavezujoči emisijski cilji, ki naj bi do leta 2020 privedli do skupnega zmanjšanja emisij v industrijskih državah za največ 25–40 % v primerjavi z letom 1990, kot je priporočeno v četrtem ocenjevalnem poročilu medvladnega odbora o podnebnih spremembah?
What will the Council do to guarantee that this agreement imposes binding emission targets which would lead to global emission reductions in the industrialised countries at the high end of the 25-40% range for 2020 compared to 1990, as recommended by the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change?
Kakšen je obseg sredstev, s katerimi namerava Svet podpreti ublažitev posledic in prilagajanje ter omejitev krčenja gozdov v državah v razvoju, da omogoči čim bolj obsežen sporazum v Københavnu in upraviči odgovornost, ki jo ima do držav v razvoju?
Which levels of finance does the Council plan to commit to, to support mitigation and adaptation and reduce deforestation in developing countries, in order to facilitate a comprehensive agreement in Copenhagen and to live up to its responsibility to the developing world?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0099/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0099/09
Zadeva: Strategija Komisije za konferenco o spremembi podnebja v Københavnu (COP 15)
Subject: Commission's strategy for the Copenhagen Conference on Climate Change (COP 15)
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da bodo razvite države in tiste v razvoju, ki se bodo udeležile konference o spremembi podnebja v Københavnu, dosegle velikopotezen sporazum?
What is the Commission's strategy to ensure that both developed and developing Parties to the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference reach an ambitious agreement?