natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zadeva: Vplivi aktivnih visoko napetostnih sonarjev mornarice na okolje
Subject: Environmental effects of high-intensity active naval sonars
Ali je Komisija seznanjena z naraščajočo količino dokaznega gradiva, še posebej s člankom v reviji Nature (9. oktober 2003, str.
Is the Commission aware of the growing body of evidence (see especially the article in ‘Nature’, 9 October 2003, p.
575-576), o tem, da so aktivni visoko napetostni sonarji mornarice lahko smrtno nevarni za kite, delfine in ribe?
575-76) that high-intensity active naval sonars can be lethal to whales, dolphins and fish?
Kakšen je odziv Komisije na 18 evropskih znanstvenikov, ki so sodelovali pri pisanju članka v reviji Nature in so izjavili: "naši izsledki se morajo upoštevati pri uredbi in omejevanju škodljivega vpliva s strani človeka izdelanih sonarjev na kite"?
What is the Commission's response to the 18 European scientists who co-authored the Nature article, and stated that ‘our findings need to be taken into account in considering the regulation and limitation of the adverse impact of anthropogenic sonar on cetaceans’?
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti glede rastočega problema, predvsem za zagotovitev varstvenih zahtev Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst?
What does the Commission intend to do about this growing problem, to ensure especially the protection requirements of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora?
Kako bo Komisija v skladu s previdnostnim načelom zagotovila, da nadaljnji razvoj na vojaškem področju ne bo imel negativnega vpliva na okolje?
How will the Commission, in line with the precautionary principle, make sure that new developments in military technologies do not have negative effects on the environment?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0046/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0046/04
, v imenu Odbora za promet in turizem
, on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism
Zadeva: Srečanje ICAO
Subject: ICAO Meeting
ZDA lahko na srečanju ICAO 28.09.2004 predlagajo resolucijo za izključitev kakršnekoli možnosti gospodarskega, davčnega ali globalnega trgovanja z emisijami za mednarodno letalstvo.
The USA may propose a resolution at the ICAO meeting of 28 September 2004 to exclude any possibility of economic, fiscal or global emissions trading for international aviation.
Ali je Svet seznanjen z možnostjo takšne pobude?
Is the Council aware of this potential initiative?
Kako bo Svet zagotovil ohranitev svobode odločanja EU o gospodarskih, davčnih in globalnih emisijskih instrumentih na področju letalstva, da bi se v prihodnosti razvila trajnostna prometna politika?
How will the Council ensure that the EU retains its freedom to decide on economic, fiscal or global emissions instruments in the field of aviation, in order to develop a sustainable transport policy in the future?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0047/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0047/04
Zadeva: Seja Mednarodne organizacije za civilni letalski promet (ICAO)
Subject: ICAO Meeting
ZDA bodo na seji ICAO 28.septembra 2004 morda predlagala resolucijo proti možnim gospodarskemu in davčnemu trgovanju ter globalnemu trgovanju z emisijami v mednarodnem letalstvu.
The USA may propose a resolution at the ICAO meeting of 28 September 2004 to exclude any possibility of economic, fiscal or global emissions trading for international aviation.
Je Komisija seznanjena z možnostjo take pobude?
Is the Commission aware of this potential initiative?
Kaj bo Komisija storila za ohranitev svobode pri uporabi gospodarskih in davčnih instrumentov ter pri trgovanju z emisijami na področju letalstva, da bi v prihodnosti lahko razvili trajnostno prometno politiko?
How will the Commission ensure that the EU retains its freedom to decide on economic, fiscal or global emissions instruments in the field of aviation, in order to develop a sustainable transport policy in the future?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0048/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0048/04
Zadeva: Strategija Evropske unije za boj proti dopingu v športu
Subject: EU strategy for combating doping in sport
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0049/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0049/04
Zadeva: Strategija Sveta v zvezi s konferenco o podnebnih spremembah v Buenos Airesu
Subject: Council strategy for the Buenos Aires Conference on Climate Change
Ali lahko Svet podrobno opredeli svoje cilje v zvezi z bližnjo konferenco pogodbenic, ki bo od 6. do 17. decembra 2004 potekala v Buenos Airesu?
Could the Council clarify its objectives for the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to be held in Buenos Aires on 6-17 December 2004?
Kakšna je strategija Sveta za spodbuditev drugih pogodbenic k ratifikaciji Kjotskega protokola in kako bo ukrepal glede njihovega izvajanja?
What is the Council strategy to encourage other Parties to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, and what measures will be taken for its implementation?
Kako namerava Svet vključiti poslance Evropskega parlamenta v delegacijo Skupnosti na konferenci?
How is the Council planning to involve the Members of the European Parliament who are serving on the Community delegation to the Conference?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0050/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0050/04
Zadeva: Strategija Komisije v zvezi s konferenco o podnebnih spremembah v Buenos Airesu
Subject: Commission strategy for the Buenos Aires Conference on Climate Change
Ali lahko Komisija podrobno opredeli svoje cilje v zvezi z bližnjo konferenco pogodbenic, ki bo od 6. do 17. decembra 2004 potekala v Buenos Airesu?
Could the Commission clarify its objectives for the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to be held in Buenos Aires on 6-17 December 2004?
Kakšna je strategija Komisije za spodbuditev drugih pogodbenic k ratifikaciji Kjotskega protokola in kako bo ukrepala glede njegovega izvajanja?
What is the Commission strategy to encourage other Parties to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, and what measures will be taken for its implementation?
Kako namerava Komisija vključiti poslance Evropskega parlamenta v delegacijo Skupnosti na konferenci?
How is the Commission planning to involve the Members of the European Parliament who are serving on the Community delegation to the Conference?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0051/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0051/04
, v imenu skupine PPE-DE
, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
Zadeva: Sklep Evropskega sveta v zvezi s pristopom Turčije
Subject: European Council decision concerning the accession of Turkey
Evropski svet se bo moral 17. decembra 2004 odločiti (na podlagi mnenja Komisije z dne 6. oktobra glede izpolnjevanja kopenhagenskih meril), ali bo pričel pristopna pogajanja s Turčijo.
On 17 December 2004 the European Council will have to take a decision (based on the opinion issued by the Commission on 6 October concerning compliance with the Copenhagen criteria) on whether or not to open accession negotiations with Turkey.
Kako lahko gledamo na nedavne dejavnosti Turčije kot države kandidatke?
How are the most recent actions taken by Turkey in its capacity as an applicant country to be viewed?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0052/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0052/04
, v imenu skupine ALDE /ADLE
, on behalf of the ALDE /ADLE Group
Zadeva: Odprava embarga na orožje za Kitajsko
Subject: Lifting China arms embargo
V prihodnjih tednih bodo zunanji ministri EU razpravljali o odpravi embarga na orožje za Kitajsko.
The EU Foreign Ministers are due to discuss the lifting of the China arms embargo in the coming weeks.
Odprava embarga, ki je bil uveden leta 1989, potem ko je prišlo do pobojev na Trgu nebeškega miru, bi bilo napačno sporočilo spričo dejstva, da na področju človekovih pravic ni bilo nobenega jasnega in dejanskega napredka.
Lifting the embargo imposed in 1989 after the Tianamen Square killings would be the wrong message if there was no clear and concrete progress in return on human rights.
Kopičenje orožja in razvoj raket v obalnih pokrajinah blizu tajvanske ožine prav tako kaže na to, da bi bila odprava embarga neprimerna.
The arms build-up and the development of missiles in the coastal provinces adjacent to the Taiwan Straits show also that lifting the embargo is inappropriate.
Ob upoštevanju poročil o slabem napredku na področju človekovih pravic v okviru dialoga o človekovih pravicah s Kitajsko in ob upoštevanju rasti napetosti v tajvanski ožini na Svet naslavljam naslednje vprašanje:
Having regard to the poor human rights records noticed in the framework of the human rights dialogue with China and having regard to the rise of tensions in the Taiwan Straits:
Je Svet pripravljen podpreti resolucijo EP o prodaji orožja Kitajski (P5_TA(2003)0599), sprejeto 18. decembra 2003, kjer je v prvem odstavku zapisano, da mora Kitajska pokazati znaten napredek na področju človekovih pravic, preden lahko EU razmišlja o odpravi sankcij, in v drugem odstavku, da bi bilo spričo kitajskih groženj Demokratični republiki Kitajski napačno narediti prvi korak k odpravi evropskega embarga na orožje?
Is the Council ready to endorse the EP's resolution on arms sale to China (P5_TA(2003)0599) adopted on 18 December 2003, paragraph 1 of which states that China needs to prove it has made significant progress on human rights before the EU can consider lifting the ban, and paragraph 2 of which states that it is the wrong time, in view of Chinese threats against the Democratic Republic of China, to open the way to a lifting of the European arms embargo ?
Ima Svet namen igrati vlogo poštenega posrednika med Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko in Demokratično republiko Kitajsko pri pripravi mirne rešitve tajvanskega vprašanja?
Does the Council intend to act as the honest broker between the PRC and the DRC in order to work on a peaceful resolution of the Taiwan issue ?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0053/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0053/04
Zadeva: Zapiranje podjetij po dodelitvi finančne pomoči Evropske unije
Subject: Closure of companies subsequent to the granting of financial aid by the European Union
Mnoga podjetja se kljub svoji produktivnosti, učinkovitosti in zdravemu finančnemu stanju odločijo za selitev.
Many companies decide to relocate, even though their productivity, efficiency and economic viability are not in doubt.
To povzroča nezaposlenost - v nekaterih primerih se to dogaja v regijah, kjer ni nobenega drugega vira delovnih mest.
This creates unemployment - in some cases in regions where there is no alternative source of jobs.
Ta podjetja so pred tem dobivala spodbude in javno pomoč (tako s strani svoje domače države ali države gostiteljice kot tudi s strani EU), bolj natančno gre za pomoč pri razvoju manj razvitih regij.
The companies in question will previously have received incentives and been granted public aid (both by their home or host country and by the EU) for the specific purpose of helping struggling regions to develop.
V večini primerov se tovrstna podjetja selijo zgolj zaradi želje po večjem dobičku, ob tem pa pogosto pozabijo na svoje obveze in ne upoštevajo znatne družbene in gospodarske škode, ki jo s svojimi dejanji povzročijo.
Generally speaking, such companies relocate solely in search of maximum profitability - frequently failing to honour their commitments and disregarding the serious social and economic damage which they cause.
Najprej si zagotovijo spodbude, podporo in poceni delovno silo z malo pravicami, potem skušajo na hitro zaslužiti, hkrati pa iščejo še cenejšo alternativo.
Having first secured incentives, support and a cheap labour force with few rights, they then endeavour to make a quick profit whilst looking for a cheaper alternative.
Ko jo najdejo, se preselijo, za seboj pa pustijo družbeno razdejanje.
On finding such an alternative they relocate, leaving social devastation behind them.
Nerazumljivo je, da ta podjetja prejemajo še dodatno pomoč Skupnosti, ki naj bi jim omogočila selitev dejavnosti v drugo regijo.
Incomprehensibly, relocating companies even receive Community funding in order to enable them to set up business in a different region.
Prizadeti delavci, njihovi sindikati, lokalno prebivalstvo in lokalne oblasti si že dolgo prizadevajo, da bi zaščitili delovna mesta in zagotovili preživetje podjetij.
Much action has already been taken by affected workers, by their trade-union organisations, by local people and by local authorities in an effort to protect jobs and ensure that companies remain viable.
Ali bi, glede na zgoraj povedano, Svet odgovoril na naslednja vprašanja?
In view of the above, would the Council answer the following questions?
Kako namerava Svet ukrepati glede na priporočila, podana v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta P5_TA(2003)0106 z dne 13. marca 2003?
What action does it intend to take in response to the recommendations contained in the European Parliament's resolution P5_TA(2003)0106 of 13 March 2003?
Kaj meni o:
What view does it take of:
pogodbeni uvedbi dolgoročnega obdobja z namenom ustvarjanja trajnih ter stabilnih delovnih mest in spodbujanja gospodarskega razvoja dane regije?
the contractual establishment of a long-term period for the purpose of creating lasting, stable jobs and promoting the economic development of a region?
določitvi kazni za podjetja, ki pri selitvi ne upoštevajo svojih pogodbenih obveznosti (še posebej vračilo že izplačane pomoči in prepoved sprejemanja kakršne koli druge pomoči)?
laying down penalties to be applied to companies which relocate without meeting their contractual obligations (in particular, the repayment of aid which has already been granted and a ban on the receipt of any further aid)?
zaščiti pravic prizadetih delavcev v smislu zagotovitve, da bodo njihovi predstavniki vedno obveščeni o razvoju dogodkov, da bodo dejavno sodelovali v vseh stopnjah procesa (in da bodo imeli pravico veta), ter določitve meril za izplačilo nadomestil delavcem, če njihovo podjetje ne izpolni svojih pogodbenih obveznosti?
protecting the rights of the workers affected by fully guaranteeing that their representatives will be kept informed and be actively involved at all stages of the process (and that they will have the right of veto) and laying down criteria determining the compensation to be paid to workers if their company fails to fulfil its contractual obligations?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0054/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0054/04
Ali bi, glede na zgoraj povedano, Komisija odgovorila na naslednja vprašanja?
In view of the above, would the Commission answer the following questions?
Kako namerava Komisija ukrepati glede na priporočila, podana v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta P5_TA(2003)0106 z dne 13. marca 2003?
What action does it intend to take in response to the recommendations contained in the European Parliament's resolution P5_TA(2003)0106 of 13 March 2003?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0055/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0055/04
, v imenu skupine Verts/ALE
, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Zadeva: Patenti na področju programske opreme (ali Direktiva o patentiranju izumov, ki se uporabljajo v računalništvu KOM(2002)0092 /končno1)
Subject: Software patents (or Directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions COM(2002)0092 /final)
Še vedno je primerno, da se ta dokumentacija predloži kot gradivo A potem, ko a) je nizozemski nacionalni parlament od predsedstva zahteval, da umakne podporo direktivi in b) poljska delegacija ni bila povabljena h glasovanju v drugem in odločilnem krogu?
Is it still appropriate to have this dossier entered on the agenda as an A item when (a) the Netherlands Government has been asked by its national parliament to withdraw its support for the Directive and (b) the Polish delegation was not asked in the second and decisive round?
Delegacija je izjavila, da tudi če bi bila povabljena v drugem krogu, bi se bila vzdržala, kot že v prvem krogu.
The delegation said that, if asked in the second round, it would have abstained as it already had in the first round.
Kako Svet pojasnjuje, da se številni predlogi sprememb EP (kot 36, 72, 76, 107, 108, 111, 119) niso upoštevali, kar ima za posledico, da sedanji osnutek dopušča patentiranje programske opreme, medtem ko je EP to brezpogojno zavrnil?
Can the Council indicate why numerous amendments (such as 36, 72, 76, 107, 108, 111 and 119) tabled by the EP have not been taken into account, with the result that the current draft authorises software patents, although this was unconditionally rejected by the EP?
UL C 151 E, 25.6.2002, s 129
OJ C 151 E, 25.6.2002, p.129.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0057/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0057/04
, v imenu Odbora za ribištvo
, on behalf of the Committee on Fisheries
Zadeva: Ribiško gospodarstvo in vprašanje goriva
Subject: Fisheries economy and fuel
Cena goriva za potrebe ribištva se je v zadnjih osmih letih zelo spremenila in se je v letih med 1996 in 2004 povečala za 82% (z 0,17 €/liter na 0,31 €/liter).
The price of ‘fisheries’ fuel has risen dramatically over the last eight years, increasing by more than 82 % between 1996 and 2004 (from EUR 0.17/litre to EUR 0.31/litre).
Cena goriva v precejšnji meri vpliva na obratovalne stroške.
The price of fuel has a considerable impact on operating costs.
V primeru plovila z vlečnimi mrežami dolžine 16-20 m tako izguba bruto presežka lahko znaša od - 2,5% do -42,1% glede na poslovne rezultate za leto 2003.
For example, in the case of a trawler of between 16 and 20 m in length, the proportion of gross operating surplus that can be lost may vary between 2.5 % and 42.1 %, based on operating accounts for 2003.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bilo v tem obdobju zabeleženih kar nekaj porastov cen plinskega olja (2000, 2002, 2004).
It should be noted that, during this period, the price of diesel has peaked on several occasions (in 2000, 2002 and 2004).
Posledice so še toliko hujše, ker istočasno nastopa več dejavnikov (v glavnem trije): gorivo, padec cen in upadanje deleža lastnih sredstev.
The impact of this is felt all the more keenly, given that several factors have coincided to produce a crisis situation, in particular the following three: the fuel situation, falling prices and decreases in income.
Takšne so bile razmere poleti 2004.
This was the situation in the summer of 2004.
Predhodna kriza iz let 1993-1994, še hujša zaradi trajnega padca cen, povezanega s prekomerno zadolženostjo lastnikov ladij, je sprožila verigo dogodkov: konec dejavnosti za plovila (včasih najmodernejša); razrez plovil in prestrukturiranje lastnikov ladij; konec ribolovnih aktivnosti v več pristaniščih; izguba delovnih mest, vezanih na ribolov, in stranski učinki na gospodarski položaj okoliških manjših regij; vpad števila dijakov in študentov v pomorskih šolah in zmanjšanje števila mladih mornarjev; manjši ugled ribiškega poklica; oslabitev upravnih in finančnih struktur v ribiškem sektorju.
The previous crisis, in 1993-94, which was even more serious because of the long-term collapse in prices linked to the high level of indebtedness borne by shipowners, set off a domino effect: vessels were laid up (including the newest vessels); vessels were scrapped and fishing undertakings restructured; fisheries activities collapsed in several ports; fisheries-related jobs were lost, with knock-on effects on the economies of neighbouring small regions; there were fewer staff at maritime schools and fewer young sailors; the profession of fisherman was brought into disrepute; and management and financial structures within the fisheries sector were undermined.
Uradno stališče Skupnosti, skoraj v celoti usmerjeno v "trajnostno upravljanje ribolovnih virov v dobro prihodnjih generacij", obmolkne takoj, ko nastopijo krizne razmere.
The Community approach, which concentrates almost exclusively on sustainable management of fisheries resources as a means of preserving the interests of future generations, is nowhere to be heard in crisis situations.
Ob tem ne gre pozabiti nezaupanja, ki ga ribiški sektor izkazuje evropskim institucijam in ga potrdi ob vsakih volitvah (nezaupanja, ki se seveda še stopnjuje v težkih časih).
The lack of confidence in European institutions shown by the fisheries world is notable and is reaffirmed with each election (and it obviously deteriorates still further when times are hard).
Razmere so dejansko paradoksalne, saj bi bile brez SRP z zemljevida izbrisana cela ribiška območja.
This is a truly paradoxical situation because, without the CFP, entire fishing regions would have disappeared from the map.
Ali se Komisija obvezuje, da bo priskočila na pomoč hudo prizadetim območjem?
Is the Commission committed to taking action in support of seriously affected areas?
Ali namerava Komisija oblikovati predloge, ki bodo v kriznih časih omogočali intervencije Evropskega sklada za ribištvo oziroma katere koli druge načine in ki bodo resnična osnova za zagotavljanje prihodnosti območjem, ki nimajo druge alternative?
Does the Commission intend to submit proposals providing for economic intervention at times of crisis, drawing on the European Fisheries Fund or by other means, and thereby genuinely preserving the future of regions that have no real alternative?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0058/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0058/04
, v imenu skupine PSE
, on behalf of the PSE Group
Zadeva: Vpliv povišanja cene nafte na evropsko gospodarstvo
Subject: Impact of increased oil prices on the European economy
V zadnjih tednih je cena surove nafte dosegla rekordno raven.
Crude oil prices have reached historic levels in the last few weeks.
Glede na:
In view of:
večanje gospodarske negotovosti, ki izhaja iz številnih motenj na svetovni ravni (mednarodni spori, omejitve v svetovni trgovini),
the increased economic uncertainty resulting from a number of disturbances on the world stage (international conflicts, reduction in global trade),
visok menjalni tečaj evra,
the high euro parity rate,
dejstvo, da ti trendi na tržišču surove nafte verjetno ne bodo trajni, vendar pa lahko vračanje na stabilno raven spremljajo višje cene kot tiste, katerih smo vajeni, glede na povečano povpraševanje na eni strani in negotovost glede dobave na drugi,
the fact that, although these crude oil market trends will probably not be permanent, the return to stable levels may be accompanied by higher oil prices to those which we are accustomed given the surge in demand on the one hand and uncertainty regarding supply on the other,
veliko odvisnost EU od uvožene nafte,
the high level of EU dependence on imported oil,
neugodne vplive povišanja cen nafte na rast, inflacijo in zaposlovanje v EU; po mnenju Komisije bo 25-odstotno povišanje cene nafte v tem letu znižalo predvideno že tako skromno gospodarsko rast EU (1,7-odstotno) za 0,17 odstotkov,
the unfavourable impact of increased oil prices on EU growth, inflation and employment figures; according to the Commission a 25% increase in oil prices this year will reduce by 0.17% the already modest 1.7% EU economic growth figure forecast,
bi radi vedeli:
we should like to know:
kako dobro smo pripravljeni na neugodne vplive povišanja in nihanja cen nafte na gospodarsko rast, inflacijo in zaposlovanje v EU?
to what extent are we prepared for the unfavourable impact of increasing and fluctuating oil prices on economic growth, inflation and employment in the EU?
katere ukrepe moramo uvesti, da bi se zagotovila popolna podpora okrevanju evropskega gospodarstva?
what steps must be taken to ensure full backing for the bid to achieve European economy recovery?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0059/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0059/04
Zadeva: Vrh EU - Kitajska
Subject: EU-China Summit
8. decembra 2004 bo v Haagu (Nizozemska) potekal vrh EU-Kitajska.
On 8 December 2004, an EU-China Summit will take place in The Hague (Netherlands).
Ali bo Svet ob tej priložnosti ponovno proučil vprašanje prepovedi prodaje orožja Kitajski brez nadaljnje ocene položaja človekovih pravic v tej državi?
Does the Council intend on that occasion to re-examine the question of the embargo on sales of arms to China without further evaluation of the human rights situation in this country?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0060/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0060/04
, v imenu skupine IND/DEM
, on behalf of the IND/DEM Group