natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V primerjavi z evropskimi gradbenimi podjetji so bile ponudbene cene kitajskega ponudnika za več kot polovico nižje od stroškov, ki jih je ocenil organ, pristojen za javna naročila, ter za eno tretjino nižje od drugega najcenejšega ponudnika.
In the face of competition with European construction firms, the prices quoted by the Chinese tenderer were less than half the contracting authority’s cost estimate and one third less than the price quoted by its nearest competitor.
Ali bo Komisija uporabila pravne možnosti, ki so na voljo na podlagi sporazuma o javnih naročilih, ki ga je EU sklenila z nekaterimi tretjimi državami?
Will the Commission use all legal means available to it on the basis of the Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), which the EU has signed along with a number of non-Member States?
Ali Komisija meni, da je treba Kitajsko, ki sporazuma o javnih naročilih ni sklenila, obravnavati kot državo, ki je sklenila takšen sporazum?
In the Commission’s opinion, should China, which has not signed the GPA, be dealt with in the same way as a GPA signatory country?
Kaj bo Komisija storila, da bo Kitajsko prepričala, naj se pridruži sporazumu o javnih naročilih?
What is the Commission doing to convince China that it should accede to the GPA?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0642/2010
Question for Question Time H-0642/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Pogajanja med EU in Mercosurjem
(PPE) Subject: EU-Mercosur negotiations
Sklenitev sporazuma o proti trgovini s trgovinskim blokom Mercosur utegne resno spodkopati kmetijsko proizvodnjo v EU.
The conclusion of a free trade agreement (FTA) with the Mercosur trading bloc has the potential seriously to undermine agricultural production in the EU.
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kakšno kvoto za uvoz govedine bo po njenih pričakovanjih zahteval Mercosur na pogajanjih?
Can the Commission indicate what beef import quota they anticipate from Mercosur in negotiations?
Leta 2006 je Mercosur predložil dokument, v katerem je zahteval tarifno kvoto 300.000 ton govedine.
In 2006, Mercosur submitted a paper which included a request for a tariff quota of 300 000 tonnes of beef.
Komisija je v svojem odgovoru to zahtevo opisala kot „nekoliko preoblikovano, toda še vedno […] precej večjo kot trenutna ponudba Evropske skupnosti“.
The Commission, in its response, described this request as ‘slightly reshaped but still […] well beyond the scope of the current EC offer’.
Ali Komisija še vedno ocenjuje, da je tako obsežna kvota precej večja kot ponudba EU?
Is it still the Commission position that a quota of this magnitude would be beyond the scope of EU offers?
Kako namerava doseči, da bo dokončna dogovorjena kvota občutno nižja od 300.000 ton?
How does the Commission intend to limit the final agreed quota to a figure significantly below 300 000 tonnes?
Kakšno kvoto bi bila Komisija še pripravljena sprejeti?
What figures would the Commission be willing to agree on?
Ali lahko Komisija komentira bojazen, da se bo Mercosur v pogajanjih usmeril v evropski trg govedine visokocenovnega razreda?
Can the Commission comment on concerns that Mercosur will target the high-value end of the EU beef market in negotiations?
O kakšnih ukrepih za ublažitev razmišlja, da bi proizvajalcem iz Mercosurja to preprečila?
What mitigation measures is the Commission considering to prevent Mercosur producers specifically targeting this market?
„Elementi za morebitni sporazum“, ki jih je Mercosur predložil na srečanju EU-Mercosur na ravni koordinatorjev v Bruslju 21. marca 2006.
‘Elements for a Possible Agreement’ submitted by Mercosur at an EU-Mercosur meeting at coordinators level, held in Brussels on 21 March 2006.
Delovni dokument Komisije, o katerem je odbor 133 (odbor za trgovinsko politiko) razpravljal 27. aprila 2006, nato pa je bil posredovan Mercosurju.
Commission non-paper discussed at 133 Committee (Trade Policy Committee) on 27 April 2006 and submitted to Mercosur.
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0643/2010
Question for Question Time H-0643/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: S strani EU podprta študija glede raziskav o razvoju Donave med Straubingom in Vilshofenom
(S&D) Subject: EU-supported study to conduct variant-independent research into upgrading works on the Danube between Straubing and Vilshofen
Komisiji znova postavljamo dve od petih vprašanj, ki so že bila zastavljena v pisni obliki ( P-9178/2010 ), vendar jih je Generalni direktorat za promet povsem ignoriral.
I would like to the ask Commission once again two questions out of five that have already been put to it in writing ( P-9178/2010 ), but that the Directorate-General for Transport totally ignored.
Ali Komisija meni, da skupina za nadzor, ki jo je za projekt Vilshofen-Straubing določila EU in ji namenila kritično in konstruktivno vlogo pri zagotavljanju pravilne izvedbe študije ter pri zagotavljanju preglednosti in konsenza, ne more izpolniti svoje vloge, ker študijo izvaja podjetje Rhein-Main-Donau AG, ki ima pri tem projektu gospodarski interes?
Is the Commission of the opinion that the Vilshofen-Straubing monitoring group cannot fulfil the critical and constructive role intended for it by the EU in ensuring proper implementation of the study and ensuring transparency and consensus because this study was drawn up by Rhein-Main-Donau AG, which has itself an economic interest in these upgrading works?
Ali je Komisiji znano, da se je nemški minister za promet Ramsauer (CSU) večkrat izrekel za razvoj po različici C 280, čeprav člen 3(2)(6) odločbe o podpori določa, da mora Zvezna republika Nemčija poskrbeti za nestrankarsko in objektivno izvedbo raziskav?
Is the Commission aware that the German transport minister, Mr Ramsauer (CSU) has publicly advocated upgrading on the basis of variant C 280, although Article III.2.6. of the grant notification requires the Federal Republic of Germany to ensure that the research is conducted impartially and objectively?
Pristojnega komisarja pozivamo, naj teh vprašanj tokrat ne ignorira.
The Commissioner responsible is requested not to ignore this question again.
33 milijonov evrov vredni študiji grozi podobna usoda kot pri projektu Stuttgart 21.
This study, at a cost of EUR 33 million, risks becoming the ‘Stuttgart 21’ of Lower Bavaria.
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0644/2010
Question for Question Time H-0644/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Priznanje palestinske države
(PPE) Subject: Recognition of a Palestinian State
Kakšna so razmišljanja Sveta glede priznanja palestinske države?
What consideration has been given by the Council to the recognition of a Palestinian State?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0645/2010
Question for Question Time H-0645/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Vulkan na Islandiji
(PPE) Subject: Volcano in Iceland
Aprila je bil evropski zračni prostor zaprt zaradi izbruha vulkana na Islandiji.
Last April, European Airspace was shut down by the eruption of a volcano in Iceland.
Po navedbah strokovnjakov bi lahko kmalu prišlo do podobnega izbruha, ki bo povzročil enake motnje kot prejšnji.
According to experts, there may be another such eruption, which will prove to be as disruptive as the last one.
Katere ukrepe je doslej sprejela Komisija, da bi se pripravili na morebitno ponovitev takšnega dogodka?
What measures has the Commission taken to prepare for such an incident, if it happens again?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0646/2010
Question for Question Time H-0646/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Sprejetje in izvajanje strategije EU za Podonavje
(S&D) Subject: Adoption and implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region
Svet je 8. decembra sprejel strategijo EU za Podonavje in spremljevalni akcijski načrt.
On 8 December, the Council adopted the EU Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR) and the related Action Plan.
Dodana vrednost te strategije je v dejstvu, da bodo države članice lahko skupaj uporabile obstoječa finančna sredstva, pri čemer bodo lahko dale večjo prednost strateškim projektom za Podonavje, ter izkoristile vmesni pregled finančne perspektive za pregled operativnih programov in tako rezervirale potrebna finančna sredstva za projekte v okviru akcijskega načrta strategije EU za Podonavje.
The added value thereof resides in the fact that the Member States are able to avail themselves jointly of existing funding, giving greater priority to strategic projects for the Danube region, and take advantage of the mid-term review of the Financial Perspective to review also the Operational Programmes, so as to earmark the funding necessary for projects forming part of the EUSDR Action Plan.
Madžarsko predsedstvo Sveta je oznanilo, da je sprejetje in uresničitev te strategije prednostna naloga njegovega mandata.
The Hungarian Council Presidency has announced that the adoption and implementation of this strategy is a priority for its term of office.
Ali lahko Madžarsko predsedstvo navede, katere ukrepe načrtuje Svet EU za sprejetje in uresničevanje strategije EU za Podonavje za prvo polovico leta 2011?
Can the Hungarian Presidency indicate what measures are being projected by the EU Council for the adoption and implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region for the first half of 2011?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0647/2010
Question for Question Time H-0647/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Varnost kmetij v EU
(ALDE) Subject: Farm safety in the EU
Stopnja umrljivosti v kmetijskem sektorju je odločno previsoka.
Death rates in the farming sector are far too high.
Na Irskem je na primer v tem letu 23 ljudi umrlo na kmetijah.
In Ireland, for instance, 23 people have died on farms so far this year.
Študija o tem vprašanju je pokazala, da je tveganje smrti na delovnem mestu v primeru kmetov desetkrat višje in kljub temu, da kmetje predstavljajo samo okoli 6 % celotnega prebivalstva, se več kot 60 % smrti na delovnem mestu zgodi v kmetijskem sektorju.
A study on this issue has shown that the risk of death in the workplace is 10 times higher in the case of farmers and that, although farmers represent only around 6% of the total population, more than 60% of deaths in the workplace occur among the farming community.
Kaj je mogoče narediti na ravni EU, da se zmanjša število smrtnih primerov in nesreč na kmetijah?
What can be done at EU level to reduce the number of farm deaths and accidents?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0648/2010
Question for Question Time H-0648/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Dežurna telefonska številka za pogrešane otroke 116 000
(ALDE) Subject: 116 000 Missing children hotline
Komisija je nedavno še zadnjič pozvala države članice EU, naj čimprej vzpostavijo evropsko dežurno telefonsko številko za pogrešane otroke 116 000.
The Commission has recently made a final call to EU Member States to activate the European missing children hotline 116 000 as soon as possible.
Ta telefonska številka bi otrokom v ključnih trenutkih zagotovila potrebno pomoč in podporo.
This telephone number would provide the necessary aid, assistance and support for children in their time of need.
Dežurna telefonska številka 116 000 zaenkrat v celoti deluje samo v dvanajstih državah članicah.
At the moment, the 116 000 hotline is fully operational only in 12 Member States.
Ali Komisija meni, da bi lahko bili otroci ogroženi, ker ta storitev še ni v celoti na voljo v vsej EU?
Does the Commission consider that the fact that the service is not operating in a full and proper manner throughout the EU could put children at risk?
Ali bodo ljudje obveščeni o tem, da ta storitev ni na voljo v njihovi državi ali v državi, ki jo obiskujejo?
Will people be informed if this service is not available in their country or in the country they are visiting?
Ali mora vsaka država članica korektno in v celoti vzpostaviti to storitev?
Must every Member State implement this service correctly and in its entirety?
Ali drži, da bi bili lahko otroci ogroženi, če storitev na tej telefonski številki ne bi bila zadovoljivo zagotovljena v vseh državah članicah?
Is it not true that the failure to provide an adequate service throughout all Member States as regards this number may put children at risk?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0649/2010
Question for Question Time H-0649/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Nadzor nad evropskim zračnim prostorom
(PPE) Subject: Control of European airspace
Pred le nekaj tedni so španski kontrolorji povzročili resne incidente, ker so zaprli španski zračni prostor in s tem močno oškodovali državljane, podjetja in celotno špansko gospodarstvo.
Only a few weeks ago, the serious incidents caused by the Spanish air traffic controllers with the closure of Spanish airspace caused enormous prejudice to citizens, companies and the whole of the Spanish economy.
Aprila letos je bil evropski zračni prostor oviran tudi zaradi izbruha vulkana na Islandiji.
In April this year, European airspace also suffered major disturbance because of the volcanic eruption in Iceland.
Ali je Komisija za takšne situacije, brez posredovanja v ukrepe, sprejete na nacionalni ravni, predvidela okrepitev zmogljivosti za odziv na evropski ravni, na primer s povečanjem pristojnosti upravljavca evropskega omrežja (Eurocontrol), s spodbujanjem mobilnosti zračnih kontrolorjev, z oblikovanjem evropskih podpornih skupin ali z razvojem novih tehnologij na področju zračne navigacije?
With regard to situations of this kind, and without prejudice to the measures taken at national level, does the Commission intend to increase response-capacity at European level by, for example, strengthening the powers of Eurocontrol, encouraging mobility amongst air traffic controllers, setting up European support teams or developing new technology in the field of air navigation?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0650/2010
Question for Question Time H-0650/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Sevanje letaliških skenerjev
(PPE) Subject: Radiation from airport scanners
V Združenih državah je bila izražena bojazen glede morebitnega tveganja za letalske potnike zaradi izpostavljenosti rentgenskemu sevanju telesnih skenerjev.
Concerns have been raised in the USA about potential risks to air passengers from exposure to the x-rays from full-body security scanners.
Ob slabem delovanju skenerja so lahko potniki izpostavljeni veliki sevalni obremenitvi.
A poorly functioning scanner could expose passengers to high levels of radiation.
Zato je redno vzdrževanje rentgenskih naprav nujno.
Regular maintenance of the x-ray devices is therefore essential.
Ali Komisija nadzoruje namestitev in delovanje telesnih skenerjev na letališčih v EU?
Does the Commission supervise the installation and operation of full-body scanners at airports in the EU?
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi seznam letališč, na katerih se taki skenerji uporabljajo že od konca leta 2010?
Can the Commission provide a list of the airports where such scanners are already (end of 2010) in operation ?
Ali lahko Komisija pove, kateri kontrolni ukrepi v zvezi z vzdrževanjem skenerjev se trenutno uporabljajo, da bi letalske potnike zaščitili pred morebitnimi zdravstvenimi tveganji pri varnostnih kontrolah na letališčih?
Can the Commission state what measures are currently in force to monitor the maintenance of scanners so as to protect passengers from potential health risks when undergoing security checks at airports?
Ali Komisija razmišlja o pobudi na tem področju?
Is the Commission considering the possibility of an initiative in this connection?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0651/2010
Question for Question Time H-0651/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Predlog o ustanovitvi evropskega centra za kibernetski kriminal
(S&D) Subject: Proposal to set up a cybercrime centre
V sporočilu Komisije z naslovom: „Izvajanje strategije notranje varnosti EU: pet korakov k varnejši Evropi“ (KOM(2010)0673) je najti tudi predlog, da bi do leta 2013 ustanovili evropski center za kibernetski kriminal.
The Commission communication entitled 'The EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe' (COM(2010)0673) proposes that a 'Cybercrime Centre' should be set up by 2013.
Kakšne pristojnosti bo imel center za kibernetski kriminal?
What competences will the Cybercrime Centre have?
Kakšni bodo njegovi cilji in naloge?
What will the Centre's objectives and tasks be?
Kakšne poklicne kvalifikacije bodo morali imeti kandidati za zaposlitev?
What professional qualifications will be required of the staff to be recruited?
Od kod bodo prišla sredstva, namenjena ustanovitvi centra?
Where will the financial resources come from to set up such a Centre?
Kje bi moral biti po mnenju Komisije sedež centra?
In the Commission's view, where should the Centre be based?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0652/2010
Question for Question Time H-0652/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Lihtenštajn in schengensko območje
(ALDE) Subject: Liechtenstein and the Schengen Area
V kakšni fazi je postopek za ratifikacijo protokola, ki bo Lihtenštajnu omogočil, da se formalno vključi v schengensko območje?
What is the current status of the procedure to ratify a protocol allowing Liechtenstein formally to join the Schengen Area?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0653/2010
Question for Question Time H-0653/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Varnost v cestnem prometu v Evropski uniji
(ALDE) Subject: Road safety in the European Union
Ali lahko Komisija v izjavi podrobno navede, katere specifične ukrepe načrtuje v podporo prizadevanjem držav članic za izboljšanje varnosti v cestnem prometu v Evropski uniji?
Can the Commission make a detailed statement outlining the specific actions the Commission is undertaking to support the efforts of Member States to improve road safety in the European Union?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0654/2010
Question for Question Time H-0654/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Trajnostna gospodarska rast in ustvarjanje delovnih mest
(ALDE) Subject: Sustainable economic growth and job creation
Katere pobude za podporo trajnostni gospodarski rasti in ustvarjanju delovnih mest v Evropski uniji bo predsedstvo uvedlo v prihodnjih mesecih?
What initiatives will the Presidency introduce over the coming months to support sustainable economic growth and job creation in the European Union?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0655/2010
Question for Question Time H-0655/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Uvajanje visokohitrostnih širokopasovnih omrežij
(ALDE) Subject: The roll-out of high-speed broadband
Ali lahko Komisija poda podrobno izjavo o specifičnih ukrepih, ki jih načrtuje v podporo uvajanju visokohitrostne širokopasovne tehnologije v vseh državah članicah EU, tudi na Irskem?
Can the Commission make a detailed statement outlining the specific actions it will undertake to support the roll-out of high-speed broadband technology across all EU Member States, including Ireland?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000001/2011
Question for Question Time H-000001/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Predsedniške volitve v Belorusiji
(PPE) Subject: Presidential elections in Belarus
Predsedniške volitve, ki so 19. decembra potekale v Belorusiji, niso postregle s presenečenji, saj je bil sedanji predsednik Aleksander Lukašenko s skoraj 80 % glasov znova izvoljen za že četrti mandat.
The presidential elections in Belarus on 19 December ended without big surprises, with the current President Alexander Lukashenko being re-elected for a fourth term with almost 80% of the vote.
Poleg tega je bilo v protestih proti nedemokratičnemu značaju volitev aretiranih več kot 600 predstavnikov opozicije, med njimi sedem predsedniških kandidatov.
Moreover, more than 600 opposition activists were arrested during their protests against the undemocratic nature of the elections, including seven presidential candidates themselves.
Ob zatiranju opozicijskih aktivistov je Lukašenko dejal, da v Belorusiji ne bo več „nesmiselne demokracije”.
During the crackdown on opposition activists Alexander Lukashenko stated that there would be no more ‘senseless democracy’ in Belarus.
Ali lahko Svet poda oceno predsedniških volitev v Belorusiji?
Can the Council provide its assessment of these presidential elections in Belarus?
Kako jih je mogoče primerjati s prejšnjimi volitvami v državi?
How do they compare with the previous elections we had seen?
Kakšne posledice bo imela izvedba teh volitev za odnose med EU in Belorusijo?
What impact will the conduct of these elections have on EU-Belarus relations?
Ali imamo v odnosih z Belorusijo izdelano strategijo?
Do we have a strategy for our engagement with Belarus?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000002/2011
Question for Question Time H-000002/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Proračun za leto 2011 in plačila kmetovalcem iz EU
(PPE) Subject: 2011 budget and payments for EU farmers
Po razvlečenem postopku so se vse institucije EU končno dogovorile o proračunu EU za leto 2011.
After a protracted procedure all the EU institutions finally came to an agreement on the EU budget for 2011.
EP je moral umakniti svojo prvotno zahtevo po povečanju proračuna za več kot 6 % v primerjavi z letom 2010.
The EP had to back down from its initial request for a budget increase of more than 6% compared to 2010.
Končni sporazumni predlog ohranja povišanje proračuna, in sicer za 2,91 %, tako da skupaj znaša 126,5 milijona EUR, čeprav bo treba iz tega majhnega povišanja financirati nove strukture, na primer Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje.
The final compromise proposal keeps the budget increase at 2.91 %, a total of €126.5 billion, despite the fact that new structures, such as the European External Action Service, will have to be financed from this small increase.
Ali lahko Komisija natančneje razloži, kako bodo sredstva za leto 2011 vplivala na plačila litovskim kmetovalcem, pa tudi kmetovalcem iz drugih držav članic EU?
Can the Commission elaborate how these appropriations for 2011 will affect payments for Lithuanian farmers, as well as those from other EU Member States?
Ali lahko Komisija posreduje natančne zneske?
Could the Commission provide exact figures?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000003/2011
Question for Question Time H-000003/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Motnje v prometu po vsej Evropi
(ALDE) Subject: Transport disruption across Europe
Ali lahko Komisija po nedavnih motnjah v zračnem prometu zaradi močnega sneženja pojasni, s katerimi pobudami namerava izboljšati delovanje evropske prometne infrastrukture?
Can the Commission outline what initiatives it will undertake to improve the functioning of Europe’s transport infrastructure following the recent disruption to air travel due to severe snow?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000004/2011
Question for Question Time H-000004/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Ali Evropska unija priznava naciste?
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Is the European Union in favour of recognising the Nazis?
Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov je 21. decembra 2010 že drugo leto zapored sprejela resolucijo, ki obsoja glorifikacijo vseh tistih, ki so sodelovali v fašističnih enotah Waffen SS, javne manifestacije za rehabilaticijo nacistične preteklosti in nacizma, postavitev spomenikov v čast nacistom in njihovim sodelavcem, oskrunjenje in uničevanje spomenikov tistim, ki so se borili proti fašizmu in nacizmu, ter izkopavanje in odstranitev posmrtnih ostankov žrtev fašističnega barbarstva.
On 21 December 2010 the UN General Assembly adopted for the second consecutive year a resolution condemning the glorification of those who served with the fascist Waffen SS units, public manifestations of support for past and present Nazi values, the erection of monuments to the Nazis and their collaborators, the profanation and destruction of monuments to those who fought against fascism and Nazism and the illegal exhumation and removal of the remains of victims of fascist atrocities.
Resolucijo so države članice Združenih narodov sprejele z veliko večino (129), že drugo leto zapored pa so jo zavrnile Združene države, in sicer ob podpori vseh držav članic Evropske unije, ki so se glasovanja vzdržale.
This resolution was adopted by a massive majority (129) of UN member countries but rejected for the second time in succession by the United States with the support of all EU Member States, which abstained.