natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vidiki energetske učinkovitosti, spodbujanja obnovljivih virov energije in raznolikosti virov energije: Kaj bo storjeno, da se odločneje odgovori na vprašanje energetske učinkovitosti, vključno z načini spodbujanja boljšega izvajanja obstoječe zakonodaje v državah članicah?
Aspects of energy efficiency, promotion of renewables and diversification of energy sources: What will be done to address the issue of energy efficiency more strongly, including ways of encouraging better implementation of existing legislation within the Member States?
Kakšni ukrepi so predvideni za povečanje naložb v financiranje tehnologij in raziskav nadomestnih energetskih virov?
What measures are envisaged towards more investment into financing alternative energy technologies and research?
Vidiki energetske varnosti in zunanje politike: Kateri so cilji dialoga s ključnimi proizvajalkami, kot so Rusija, Norveška in organizacija OPEC, in kakšni so ukrepi za zagotavljanje ustreznega dostopa do varne in dostopne oskrbe z energijo?
Energy security and foreign policy aspects: What are the objectives regarding dialogue with key producers like Russia, Norway and the OPEC and what steps will be taken to ensure adequate access to secure and affordable energy supplies?
Kakšna pomoč bo namenjena državam v razvoju, ki so uvoznice nafte, da razvijejo alternative fosilnim gorivom?
What assistance will be given to oil-importing developing countries to develop alternatives to fossil fuels?
Makroekonomski in socialni vidiki: Vpliv višjih cen energentov na inflacijo je prispeval k odločitvi Evropske centralne banke, da zviša obrestne mere.
Macro-economic and social aspects: Increased energy prices on inflation contributed to the ECB decision to raise interest rates.
Kakšni ukrepi bodo sprejeti za a) zaščito ranljivih skupin in za b) ublažitev negativnih makroekonomskih in socialnih posledic višjih cen energentov?
What measures will be taken (a) to protect vulnerable groups and (b) to mitigate the negative macro-economic and social impact of higher energy prices?
Kje so najboljše prakse, povezane s „kratkoročnimi in usmerjenimi ukrepi“, in kakšni so njihovi rezultati?
Where are the best practices regarding 'short-term and targeted' measures, with what results?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0083/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0083/08
Vidiki špekulacij in oblikovanja cen: Kako bi bilo mogoče naftne trge napraviti bolj pregledne?
Speculation and pricing aspects: How can oil markets be made more transparent?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0084/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0084/08
Zadeva: Upravljanje arktičnega območja v globaliziranem svetu
Subject: Arctic governance in a global world
Od govora, ki ga je Gorbačov imel v Murmansku in v katerem je pozval države iz arktičnega območja k oblikovanju "resničnega območja miru in plodnega sodelovanja" na skrajnem severu, je minilo že več kot dvajset let.
It is now over 20 years since Gorbachev's speech in Murmansk when he challenged the Arctic States to form 'a genuine zone of peace and fruitful cooperation' in the far North.
V tem obdobju so se pojavila številna pomembna oziroma ključna vprašanja – onesnaževanje, podnebne spremembe, ki vodijo k odpiranju doslej zaprtih morskih poti, uporaba virov, trajnost, varna energetska oskrba, zaloge rib – , kar je usmerilo pozornost na daljni sever.
Over that period several key and critical issues – pollution, climate change leading to the opening of hitherto closed seaways, resource use, sustainability, security of energy supply, fish stocks – have merged, which have focused attention on the High North.
Konec maja 2008 je pet držav, ki mejijo na Arktiko – Kanada, Danska, Norveška, Rusija in ZDA– sprejelo izjavo (ilulissatska izjava), s katero si prizadevajo za izvajanje mednarodnega pomorskega prava za Arktiko, vendar nasprotujejo sklepanju posebnih pravnih sporazumov za Arktiko.
At the end of May 2008 the five countries bordering the Arctic, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia and the USA, adopted a declaration (Ilulissat Declaration) which seeks the application of the international law of the sea to the Arctic but is against the conclusion of a specific legal agreement for the Arctic.
To je izrednega pomena za mednarodno skupnost in vse potencialne akterje s tega območja.
This is of significant importance for the international community and all potential Arctic players.
Ali naj Komisija opredeli možne elemente trajnostne in celostne strategije Evropske unije, s katerimi se bo soočilo z izzivi in ki bi EU omogočila, da zavzame dejavnejšo vlogo v odnosu do arktične regije, zlasti glede varnostne, gospodarske in okoljske dimenzije na daljnem severu?
In order that the EU should take a more proactive role towards the Arctic region and specifically with regard to the security, economic and environmental dimensions in the High North, could the Commission identify the possible elements of a sustainable and comprehensive EU strategy in order to face these challenges?
Ker Evropska unija v tej regiji že sodeluje prek arktičnega okna iz politike severne dimenzije in prek različnih političnih področij, ki zadevajo na primer energetsko varnost, podnebne spremembe, morska vprašanja ali ribolov, na kakšen način namerava Komisija izboljšati usklajevanje svojih politik na teh področjih in kdaj namerava opredeliti resnično celovito politiko daljnega severa?
As the EU has already an interest in the Arctic, through the Arctic Window of the Northern Dimension policy and through the various policy areas, e.g. energy security, climate change, maritime issues or fishing, how is the Commission aiming at improving the coordination of its policies in these areas and when it comes to mapping out a 'real' holistic Arctic or High North policy?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0085/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0085/08
Zadeva: Pregled Priporočila 2001/331/ES o določitvi najmanjših meril za okoljske inšpekcijske preglede v državah članicah
Subject: Review of Recommendation 2001/331/EC providing for minimum criteria for environmental inspections in the Member States
Komisija je 14. novembra objavila Sporočilo (KOM(2007)0707) o pregledu Priporočila 2001/331/ES o določitvi najmanjših meril za okoljske inšpekcijske preglede v državah članicah.
On 14 November the Commission published a Communication (COM(2007)0707) on the review of Recommendation 2001/331/EC providing minimum criteria for environmental inspections in the Member States.
V priporočilu je med drugim navedeno:
The Communication recorded inter alia that:
– Informacije, ki so jih predložile države članice o tem, kako izvajajo priporočilo, so bile nepopolne ali pa jih je bilo težko primerjati.
– the information submitted by the Member States on how they were implementing the Recommendation was 'incomplete or difficult to compare';
– Med državami članicami so še vedno velike razlike pri tem, kako nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi v EU izvajajo okoljske inšpekcijske preglede.
– there are still large disparities in the way environmental inspections are being carried out by national, regional and local authorities in the EU;
– Področje uporabe priporočila je neustrezno in ne pokriva mnogih pomembnih dejavnosti, kot je Natura 2000, ter nadzora nezakonitih pošiljk odpadkov.
– the scope of the Recommendation is inadequate and does not include many important activities, such as Natura 2000, and the control of illegal waste shipments;
– Inšpekcijski načrti se v mnogih primerih niso izvedli, kjer pa obstajajo, pogosto niso javno dostopni.
– inspection plans in many instances have not been implemented and, where they do exist, are often not publicly available.
Dobro in enakomerno izvajanje prava varstva okolja je nujno.
Good and even enforcement of EU environmental law is essential.
Če ni tako, to pomeni neizpolnjevanje pričakovanj javnosti in slabitev ugleda Skupnosti kot učinkovitega varuha okolja.
Anything less disappoints public expectations and undermines the reputation of the EU as an effective guardian of the environment.
Lahko torej Komisija pojasni:
Can the Commission therefore explain:
Zakaj želi le spremeniti priporočilo in ne predlaga, da se prevzame navedba o predložitvi predloga za direktivo o okoljskih inšpekcijskih pregledih v priporočilu?
Why does it wish only to amend the Recommendation and why does it not propose to take up the reference in the Recommendation to the possibility of it submitting a proposal for a directive on environmental inspections?
Zakaj se je namesto tega odločila za postopen pristop in predlaga, da se zahteve za okoljske inšpekcijske preglede priložijo obstoječim direktivam posamezno – ta postopek pa bo gotovo dolgotrajen?
Why has it opted instead for a piecemeal approach, and proposes to attach environmental inspection requirements to existing directives individually – a process that is bound to take time?
Zakaj ni pripravljena uporabiti direktive za opredelitev izrazov, kot so „inšpekcijski pregled“ in „revizija“, za katere prizna, da jih, če so opredeljeni v priporočilu, „države članice … tolmačijo različno“?
Why is it not prepared to use a directive to define terms such as 'inspection' and 'audit', which it admits are 'interpreted in different ways by Member States' when set out in a Recommendation?
Zakaj ni pripravljena preoblikovati mreže Evropske unije za izvajanje in uveljavljanje okoljske zakonodaje v učinkovito okoljsko inšpekcijsko službo EU, ki bi imela pravico zahtevati sodelovanje organov držav članic, saj je oblikovanje takšne službe navsezadnje edini način, da bi se Komisija osvobodila odvisnosti od organov, ki si jih prizadeva nadzorovati?
Why it is not prepared to transform IMPEL into an effective EU environmental inspection force with the right to demand the cooperation of Member State authorities, since ultimately it is only through the creation of such a force that the Commission will free itself from reliance on those it is trying to control?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0086/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0086/08
Zadeva: Fundacija odbora za mednarodne računovodske standarde: pregled ustanovne listine - javna odgovornost in vsebina predlogov upravnega odbora za mednarodne računovodske standarde za spremembo
Subject: "IASCF: Review of the constitution - Public Accountability and the Composition of the IASB Proposals for Change"
Fundacija za mednarodne računovodske standarde je 21. julija izdala posvetovalni dokument »Pregled ustanovne listine – javna odgovornost in vsebina predlogov upravnega odbora za mednarodne računovodske standarde za spremembo«.
On 21 July the International Accounting Standards Foundation issued a consultation document "Review of the constitution – Public Accountability and the Composition of the IASB Proposals for Change".
Spomniti je treba, da mednarodne računovodske standarde, ki jih je oblikoval upravni odbor za mednarodne računovodske standarde, Evropska unija s postopkom komitologije spremeni v zakonodajo EU.
It should be recalled that the European Union transposes the international accounting standards developed by the IASB into EU law through comitology.
Predlagane spremembe ustanovne listine Fundacije odbora za mednarodne računovodske standarde se delno prekrivajo z resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o mednarodnih standardih računovodskega poročanja in vodenju upravnega odbora za mednarodne računovodske standarde ( P6_TA(2008)0183 ).
The proposed changes to the constitution of the IASCF are partly a response to a European Parliament resolution on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the Governance of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) ( P6_TA(2008)0183 ).
Glede na te okoliščine Evropski parlament poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj razloži:
Against this background, will the Commission explain:
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0087/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0087/08
, v imenu Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ,
, on behalf of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ,
Zadeva: Izvršitev sodbe Sodišča v zadevi "Turco" (preglednost pri pripravi zakonodajnega dela/dokumentov)
Subject: Enforcement of the ECJ Judgment on the 'Turco' Case (transparency in the legislative preparatory works/documents
Po mnenju Sodišča ne bi več smelo prihajati do tega, da bi s to utemeljitvijo (ki bolj ustreza zaščiti pogajanj med diplomati kot med zakonodajalci) zaobšli „prevladujoče“ načelo za zagotavljanje demokratičnega nadzora državljanov Evropske unije nad zakonodajnim postopkom v EU.
According to the Court, such a justification (which is more suitable to protect negotiations between diplomats than between legislators) will no longer be invoked to outweigh the ‘overriding’ principle of ensuring democratic control by EU citizens over the EU legislative process.
Glede na povedano:
In the light of the above:
Kako in kdaj bo Svet spremenil svoja notranja pravila in posodobil upravna navodila za različne stopnje priprave, dopolnitve, razdeljevanja in arhiviranja dokumentov, bistveno povezanih z zakonodajnim postopkom, kot je bilo predvideno?
How and when will the Council amend its internal rules and update its administrative instructions in the various phases of production, elaboration, diffusion and archiving of documents, in particular in relation to a planned legislative procedure?
Kdaj bo Svet začel dosledno izpolnjevati člen 12 uredbe (ES) št. 1049/01 , v skladu s katerim:
When will the Council apply strictly Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/01 according to which:
– je treba objaviti identiteto nacionalne delegacije;
– the identity of the national delegation should be known ;
– mora biti v vseh pripravljalnih dokumentih naveden zakonodajni postopek;
– the all the preparatory documents should show the legislative procedure reference ;
– morajo biti v vseh dnevnih redih in izidih posvetovanj Sveta in pripravljalnih teles jasno navedeni osnovni dokumenti, poleg tega pa jih je treba pravočasno evidentirati in objaviti v registru Sveta (vključno s t. i. gradivom za sejo)?
– all the agendas and outcome of proceedings of the Council and preparatory bodies should make clear reference to the background documents and should be registered in good time and published in the Council Register (including ‘room documents’);
Kako bo generalni sekretariat Sveta dosegel dosledno izvajanje uredbe (ES) št. 1049/01?
How will the General Secretariat of the Council enforce the strict compliance by the Council Secretariat of Regulation (EC) No 1049/01?
Ali se Svet z medinstitucionalnega vidika strinja, da bi bilo treba na podlagi te sodbe Sodišča drugače dojemati tudi medinstitucionalno sodelovanje in strategijo, povezano s ciljem boljše priprave zakonodaje, kot je bilo določeno v birminghamski izjavi Evropskega sveta leta 1992, kar je šele treba začeti pravilno izvajati?
In an interinstitutional perspective, does the Council agree that this ECJ judgment should also set in a new perspective the interinstitutional cooperation and strategy linked to the ‘better law-making’ objective as launched by the European Council Birmingham Declaration in 1992, which still need to be properly implemented?
UL L 145 z dne 31.5.2001, str.
OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0088/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0088/08
Zadeva: Izvršitev sodbe Sodišča v zadevi "Turco" (preglednost pri pripravi zakonodajnega dela/dokumentov)
Subject: Fulfilment of the CJ Judgment on the 'Turco' Case (transparency in legislative preparatory works/documents)
1. julija je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti s pomembno sodbo v združenih zadevah C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P pozvalo Svet (posredno pa tudi druge institucije, udeležene v zakonodajnem postopku), da je treba „krepiti demokratično pravico evropskih državljanov, da nadzirajo informacije, na katerih je temeljil zakonodajni akt“ (odstavek 67) ter jim omogočiti dostop do dokumentov (med drugim do mnenja pravne službe), ki so bili doslej izvzeti z utemeljitvijo, da gre za zaščito postopka sprejemanja odločitev v instituciji.
By 1 July ECJ landmark judgment on the joint cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P, the ECJ called on the Council (but implicitly also the other institutions associated in the legislative process) to strengthen ‘... the democratic right of European citizens to scrutinise the information which has formed the basis of a legislative act’ (par.67) by giving even access to the documents (such as the Legal Service Opinions) which were until now excluded in order to ‘protect’ the institution’s decision-making process.
Po mnenju Sodišča ne bi več smelo prihajati do tega, da bi s to utemeljitvijo zaobšli „prevladujoče“ načelo za zagotavljanje demokratičnega nadzora državljanov Evropske unije nad zakonodajnim postopkom v EU.
According to the Court such a justification may no longer be invoked to outweigh the ‘overriding’ principle ensuring democratic control by the EU citizens of the EU legislative process.
Po tej razlagi morajo Svet in tudi druge institucije, ki so vključene v zakonodajni postopek EU, nemudoma izvršiti sodbo Sodišča in smiselno uporabljati uredbo (ES) št. 1049/01 .
From this perspective not only the Council but also the other institutions associated to the EU legislative process should urgently fulfil the ECJ judgment and duly apply Regulation (EC) No 1049/01 .
Če to upoštevamo:
Bearing this in mind:
Ali se Komisija z medinstitucionalnega vidika in ne glede na sedanjo obsežno revizijo uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 strinja, da bi bilo treba na podlagi te sodbe Sodišča drugače dojemati tudi medinstitucionalno sodelovanje in strategijo, povezano s ciljem boljše priprave zakonodaje?
From an interinstitutional perspective and notwithstanding the current substantial revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, does the Commission agree that this ECJ Judgment should cast new light also on the interinstitutional cooperation and strategy linked with the so-called ‘better lawmaking’ objective?
Ali se Komisija glede na to, da je na tisoče predzakonodajnih dokumentov shranjenih na različnih krajih, strinja, da bi morala imeti Evropska unija poseben oddelek uradnega lista, ki bi bil primerljiv z ameriškim zveznim registrom, kjer bi vsakdo dobil informacije o potekajočih javnih posvetovanjih?
Having regard to the thousands of pre-legislative documents currently stored in several places, does the Commission agree that the EU should have a special section of the Official Journal comparable to the US Federal Register, where everybody could be informed of the current public consultations?
Kdaj bo stekel medinstitucionalni pilotni projekt o preglednosti zakonodaje na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice (TRANS-JAI), ki ga je leta 2004 začel komisar Vitorino?
When will the interinstitutional pilot project on legislative transparency in the area of freedom, security and justice (TRANS-JAI) launched by Commissioner Vitorino in 2004 be operational?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je načelo preglednosti tesno povezano z načelom dobrega upravljanja (člen 41 listine), tako da bi tudi za nezakonodajne postopke evropski državljani morali poznati:
Does the Commission agree that the transparency principle is deeply interlinked with the principle of good administration (Art. 41 of the Charter) so that even for the non-legislative procedures the European citizen should know:
– obseg pristojnosti notranjih enot evropskih institucij,
– the remit of competences of each of the European Institutions’ internal units,
– formalni delovni proces in okvirne notranje roke upravnih postopkov,
– the formal workflow and the indicative internal deadlines of a specific administrative procedure,
– službe, pri katerih lahko dobijo podporo, informacije ali upravno varstvo?
– the services to which the citizen should refer to obtain support, information or administrative redress?
Kdaj bo Komisija izpolnila uredbo (ES) št. 1049/01 in ustvarila svoj register, s tem pa upoštevala priporočila evropskega varuha človekovih pravic (pritožba 3208/2006/GG) v zvezi z njeno obveznostjo, da mora vključiti reference vseh dokumentov v smislu člena 3(a), ki jih ima v registru iz člena 11 uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, v obsegu, v katerem to doslej še ni bilo narejeno?
When will the Commission comply with Regulation (EC) No 1049/01 by creating its own Register and follow the recommendation of the European Ombudsman (Complaint 3208/2006/GG) as regards its obligation to ‘include references to all documents within the meaning of Article 3(a) that are in its possession in the register foreseen by Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, to the extent that this has not yet been done’?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0089/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0089/08
Zadeva: Obvladovanje cen energije
Subject: Getting a grip on energy prices
V zadnjih mesecih je prišlo do nihanj cen surove nafte, kar je povzročilo drastične podražitve.
In the past few months, crude oil has been subjected to price fluctuations, resulting in dramatic increases.
Zaradi povečanega svetovnega povpraševanja, vse večje odvisnosti EU in premajhne raznolikosti virov oskrbe je gospodarstvo EU še posebej izpostavljeno vplivu teh sprememb.
With the increase in world demand, growing EU dependency and the lack of supply diversification, the EU economy in particular is exposed to the impact of price changes.
Vidiki oblikovanja cen: Kako bi lahko dosegli, da bi bili naftni trgi preglednejši in da bi zagotavljali zanesljive informacije?
Pricing aspects: How can oil markets be made more transparent with reliable information?
Je Svet zadovoljen s stopnjo konkurenčnosti med glavnimi naftnimi družbami?
Is the Council satisfied with competition levels between major oil companies?
Je Svet vzpostavil jasno razmerje med menjalnim tečajem dolarja in gibanjem cen nafte?
Has the Council established a clear relationship between the $ exchange rate and oil price trends?
Konkurenčnost: Kako namerava Svet izboljšati vlogo Evropske investicijske banke pri financiranju projektov energetske učinkovitosti s posebnim poudarkom na malih in srednje velikih podjetjih?
Competitiveness: How is the Council thinking of improving the EIB’s role in the funding of energy efficiency projects, with a special focus on SMEs?
Preglednost naftnih trgov: Ali je Svet opravil natančno analizo o tem, kako so naftne družbe povišale in znižale cene nafte za potrošnike glede na nedavno krizo pri cenah nafte?
Transparency of oil markets: Has the Council made a thorough analysis of how oil companies have raised and reduced fuel prices for consumers on the basis of the recent oil price crisis?
Kdaj namerava Svet odobriti konkretne predloge za mehanizme tedenskega poročanja o komercialnih zalogah nafte?
When does the Council plan to approve concrete proposals on the mechanism of ‘weekly reporting’ on commercial oil stocks?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0090/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0090/08
Je Komisija zadovoljna s stopnjo konkurenčnosti med glavnimi naftnimi družbami?
Is the Commission satisfied with competition levels between major oil companies?
Je Komisija vzpostavila jasno razmerje med menjalnim tečajem dolarja in gibanjem cen nafte?
Has the Commission established a clear relationship between the $ exchange rate and oil price trends?
Konkurenčnost: Kako namerava Komisija izboljšati vlogo Evropske investicijske banke pri financiranju projektov energetske učinkovitosti s posebnim poudarkom na malih in srednje velikih podjetjih?
Competitiveness: How is the Commission thinking of improving the EIB’s role in the funding of energy efficiency projects, with a special focus on SMEs?
Preglednost naftnih trgov: Ali je Komisija opravila natančno analizo o tem, kako so naftne družbe povišale in znižale cene nafte za potrošnike glede na nedavno krizo pri cenah nafte?
Transparency of oil markets: Has the Commission made a thorough analysis of how oil companies have raised and reduced fuel prices for consumers on the basis of the recent oil price crisis?
Kdaj namerava Komisija pripraviti konkretne predloge za mehanizme tedenskega poročanja o komercialnih zalogah nafte?
When does the Commission plan to come up with concrete proposals on the mechanism of ‘weekly reporting’ on commercial oil stocks?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0091/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0091/08