natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Odbor ZN za človekove pravice, Odbor ZN za odpravo rasne diskriminacije, Parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope, Kongres lokalnih in regionalnih skupnosti Sveta Evrope, komisar za človekove pravice Sveta Evrope, Evropska komisija za boj proti rasizmu in nestrpnosti in Parlamentarna skupščina OVSE so vsi podali priporočila, da je treba osebam, ki nimajo državljanstva, omogočiti sodelovanje na lokalnih volitvah.
The UN Human Rights Committee, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe, the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly have recommended making it possible for non-citizens to participate in local elections.
Evropski parlament je v resoluciji z dne 11. marca 2004 o izčrpnem spremljevalnem poročilu Evropske komisije o pripravljenosti držav na članstvo v EU predlagal, da latvijske oblasti preučijo možnost, kako osebam, ki nimajo državljanstva, vendar že veliko let prebivajo v državi, omogočiti sodelovanje na volitvah lokalne samouprave.
In the resolution on the comprehensive monitoring report by the European Commission on the state of preparedness for EU membership of 11 March 2004 the European Parliament proposed that the Latvian authorities envisage the possibility of allowing non-citizens who are long-time inhabitants to take part in local self-government elections.
Ali se Komisija strinja z omenjenim priporočilom Evropskega parlamenta?
– Does the Commission agree with the abovementioned recommendation of the European Parliament?
Kakšne ukrepe je Komisija sprejela v zvezi s priporočilom Evropskega parlamenta?
– How did the Commission address the issue in order to follow up the recommendation of the European Parliament?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da lahko demokratični deficit v Latviji začne predstavljati resno kršenje načel demokracije ter spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin?
– Does the Commission agree that the democratic deficit in Latvia may represent a clear risk of a serious breach of the principles of democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0008/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0008/09
Zadeva: Proizvodnja in zaposlovanje v sektorju tekstila in oblačil v številnih državah članicah EU
Subject: Production and employment in the textile and clothing sector in various EU Member States
Evropska unija in Kitajska sta se dogovorili o skupnem sistemu nadzora izvoza nekaterih kategorij proizvodov iz tekstila in oblačil iz Kitajske v države članice EU, a je njegova veljavnost potekla 31. decembra 2008.
The European Union and China agreed to a joint surveillance system relating to exports of certain categories of textile and clothing products from China to EU Member States, but this system expired on 31 December 2008.
V zadnjih dveh letih je delo izgubilo 350 000 ljudi, število podjetij pa se je zmanjšalo za 5%.
During the last two years, 350 000 jobs have been lost and the number of companies has fallen by 5%.
Ob upoštevanju naraščajočega števila družb, ki so prenehale ali preselile proizvodnjo, kar vodi k povečani brezposelnosti v številnih regijah
In view of the increasing number of enterprises that are ceasing or relocating production, leading to an increase in unemployment in several regions:
Ali je Komisija ali katera država članica predlagala ali zahtevala podaljšanje dvostranskega nadzornega mehanizma na obdobje po 31. decembru 2008 ali druge tovrstne ukrepe?
Has the Commission or any Member State proposed or requested an extension to the dual surveillance mechanism beyond 31 December 2008 or any other measures in this connection?
Katere ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bi zavarovala proizvodnjo in zaposlenost v sektorju tekstila in oblačil?
What measures does the Commission intend to adopt to protect production and employment in the textile and clothing sector?
Ali bo Komisija še naprej spremljala sprotni razvoj trga (evidenco uvoza in spremljanje carinjenja) ter sektor obveščala o zadnjih spremembah?
Will the Commission continue to monitor real-time market developments (import statistics and customs monitoring) and keep the sector informed of the latest developments?
Kakšne so trenutne razmere pri predlagani uredbi o oznakah „izdelano v“?
What is the current situation regarding the proposed regulation on 'made in' labels?
Kakšne ukrepe je sprejela Komisija v zvezi s predlogi, ki jih je EP sprejel v svoji resoluciji z dne 13. decembra 2007 ( P6_TA(2007)0628 )?
What measures have been taken by the Commission to address the proposals adopted by the European Parliament in its resolution of 13 December 2007 ( P6_TA(2007)0628 )?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0009/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0009/09
Zadeva: Barcelonski cilji na področju otroškega varstva
Subject: Childcare facilities - Barcelona objectives
Že leta 1992 je Svet sprejel priporočilo (92/241/EGS ), ki v katerem je opozoril na pomen kakovostne nege in varstva otrok, ki je po dostopnih cenah na voljo vsem, ter pozival k prilagodljivosti in raznolikosti, da bi lahko izpolnili potrebe in želje staršev in njihovih otrok.
As long ago as 1992, the Council adopted a Recommendation (92/241/EEC ) highlighting the importance of affordable, accessible and quality childcare services while encouraging flexibility and diversity in order to meet the needs and preferences of parents and their children.
Svet v Barceloni (sklepi predsedstva s 15. in 16. marca 2002) je leta 2002 dal pobudo, da bi države članice spodbudili k odpravi tistih ovir, „ki ženske odvračajo od udeležbe na trgu dela in si ob upoštevanju povpraševanja po otroških varstvenih ustanovah in v skladu z nacionalnimi vzorci zagotavljanja otroškega varstva [prizadevajo], da bi do leta 2010 zagotovile otroško varstvo najmanj za 90 % predšolskih otrok, starih 3 ali več let in šoloobveznih otrok ter najmanj za 33 % otrok, starih manj kot tri leta“.
In 2002, the Barcelona Council (Presidency conclusions of 15/16 March 2002) took the initiative of inviting Member States to ‘remove disincentives to female labour force participation and strive, taking into account the demand for childcare facilities and in line with national patterns of provision, to provide childcare by 2010 to at least 90% of children between 3 years old and the mandatory school age and at least 33% of children under 3 years of age’.
Komisija je v svojem poročilu z dne 3. oktobra 2008 (KOM(2008)0638) z naslovom „Uresničevanje barcelonskih ciljev glede varstva predšolskih otrok“ prišla do sklepa, da je treba storiti še veliko, da bi dosegli zadovoljivo raven zagotavljanja otroškega varstva, zlasti za otroke, mlajše od treh let, in da večina držav članic najbrž ne bo izpolnila barcelonskih ciljev.
In its report dated 3 October 2008 (COM(2008)0638) ‘Implementation of the Barcelona objectives concerning childcare facilities for pre-school-age children’), the Commission concludes that much still needs to be done to achieve satisfactory levels of childcare provision, particularly for the under-threes, and that most Member States will most likely not reach the Barcelona goals.
Češko predsedstvo v svojem delovnem programu izpostavlja varstvo otrok na domu kot popolnoma sprejemljivo alternativo poklicni karieri, za katero predsedstvo meni, da si zasluži spoštovanje in podporo državnih oblasti in družbe.
In its work programme, the Czech Presidency stresses home childcare as a fully fledged alternative to a professional career, an alternative that the Presidency considers deserves both respect and support from the state and society.
Zakaj je treba pregledati in morebiti spremeniti barcelonske cilje na področju otroškega varstva?
Why is there a need to review and possibly change the Barcelona objectives on childcare facilities?
S katerimi novimi spodbudami bo predsedstvo zagotovilo, da bodo države članice storile vse, da bi izpolnile barcelonske cilje?
What new incentives will the Presidency present to ensure that the Member States make all efforts to reach the Barcelona goals?
UL L 123, 8.5.1992, str.
OJ L 123, 8.5.1992, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0010/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0010/09
Zadeva: Uporaba odpadnih olj, ki vsebujejo poliklorirane bifenile (PCB), v irskem obratu za predelavo hrane
Subject: The use of PCB waste oils in an Irish food recycling plant
Ali lahko Komisija obvesti Evropski parlament o stanju v zvezi z nacionalnimi načrti za dekontaminacijo in/ali odstranitev polikloriranih bifenilov (uporabljali so se v transformatorskih oljih; v Evropski uniji so prepovedani od leta 1976), o katerih morajo države članice poročati Komisiji v skladu s členom 11 direktive 96/59/ES ?
Could the Commission inform the European Parliament about the current status of the national plans for the decontamination and/or disposal of PCBs (used as electronic transformer oils and banned in the EU since 1976), which Member States are obliged to communicate to the Commission according to Article 11 of Directive 96/59/EC ?
Kaj Komisija meni o tem, da nacionalni načrti za odstranitev polikloriranih bifenilov po kontaminaciji živalskih maščob v Belgiji leta 1999 zdaj že drugič niso učinkovito zaščitili krmne in prehranske verige, saj so se te snovi leta 2008 na Irskem pojavile v krmi za prašiče?
What is the Commission view on the fact that national PCB disposal plans have not effectively protected the feed and food chain for the second time after the contamination of animal fats in Belgium in 1999 and now breadmeal in Ireland in 2008?
Ali lahko Komisija nosilcem živilske in krmne dejavnosti ter potrošnikom zagotovi, da bodo vse zaloge polikloriranih bifenilov v vseh 27 državah članicah EU varno odstranjene najkasneje do leta 2010, kot je določeno v členu 3 direktive 96/59/ES, in če ne, kako bo preprečila, da bi preostale zaloge polikloriranih bifenilov v EU prišle v krmno in prehransko verigo?
Can the Commission provide guarantees to feed and food business operators and consumers that all remaining PCB stocks will be safely disposed of in all 27 EU Member States at the latest by the end of 2010, as required by Article 3 of Directive 96/59/EC, and, if not, what will the Commission do to prevent the risk of remaining PCB stocks in the EU entering the feed and food chain?
Ali bi bila Komisija pripravljena predstaviti poročilo o stanju v zvezi z izvajanjem uredbe o zahtevah glede higiene krme (ES) št. 183/2005 po vsej EU, zlasti o razvrstitvi nosilcev krmne dejavnosti v povezavi s stopnjo tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo, glede na to, da so irske oblasti sušilnici za krmo, ki je bila izvor kontaminacije, podelili status „nizkega tveganja“?
Would the Commission be willing to present a report on the state of implementation of EU Feed Hygiene Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 across the EU and in particular the classification of feed business operators in relation to the level of risk they present in the light of the ‘low risk status’ granted by the Irish authorities for the drying plant for breadmeal at the origin of the contamination?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je neenotno izvajanje te uredbe, opisano v poročilih misij Urada za prehrano in veterinarstvo v državah članicah, morda privedlo do neustrezne razvrstitve tveganja za predelovalce presežkov hrane, ki izvajajo postopke, kot je sušenje, zaradi katerih je v preteklosti prišlo do številnih incidentov v zvezi z varnostjo krme?
Would the Commission agree that the uneven implementation of this Regulation according to Food and Veterinary Office mission reports in Member States may have led to inadequate risk classification of ‘surplus food processors’ carrying out processing activities, such as drying, which have led to a number of feed safety incidents in the past?
UL L 243 z dne 24.9.1996, str.
OJ L 243, 24.9.1996, p.
UL L 35 z dne 8.2.2005, str.
OJ L 35, 8.2.2005, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0011/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0011/09
Zadeva: petdeseta obletnica tibetanske vstaje ter dialoga med dalajlamo in kitajsko vlado
Subject: 50th anniversary of the Tibetan uprising and dialogue between the Dalai Lama and the Chinese Government
– ker bo 10. marca letos petdeseta obletnica tibetanske nacionalne vstaje proti kitajski upravi;
Considering that 10 March this year is the 50th anniversary of the Tibetan national uprising against the Chinese administration;
– ker so bila pogajanja med kitajskimi oblastmi in njegovo svetostjo dalajlamo prekinjena;
considering the breakdown of the negotiations between the Chinese authorities and His Holiness the Dalai Lama;
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije ( P6_TA(2008)0119 ) o Tibetu z dne 10. aprila 2008, v kateri je:
having regard to the EP resolution ( P6_TA(2008)0119 ) of 10 April 2008 on Tibet, in which the European Parliament:
– pozval k odprti in neodvisni preiskavi pod okriljem Združenih narodov o nedavnih neredih in represiji v Tibetu (...);
called for an open and independent inquiry, under the auspices of the United Nations, into the recent riots and repression in Tibet (...);
– pozval Svet (…), naj pozorno spremlja razvoj dogodkov ter zagotovi, da bo EU sprejela skladno stališče in da bodo sklepi, sprejeti po njem, ustrezno izvajani (…);
called on the Council (...) closely to monitor developments, and to ensure that the EU adopts a consistent common position and that decisions taken on the basis thereof are duly implemented (...);
– ponovno pozval Svet, naj imenuje posebnega odposlanca za Tibet, ki bi omogočil dialog med stranema (…);
reiterated its call on the Council to appoint a special envoy for Tibetan issues in order to facilitate the dialogue between the parties (...);
– (…) pozval, naj se brez pogojevanja začne konstruktiven dialog, da bi dosegli celovit politični sporazum, vključno s trajno rešitvijo v zvezi s kulturno in politično avtonomijo Tibeta ter versko svobodo in dejanskimi pravicami tibetanskih manjšin v drugih, sosednjih kitajskih provincah;
(...) called for a constructive dialogue to be opened without preconditions, with a view to reaching a comprehensive political agreement, including a sustainable solution with regard to the cultural and political autonomy of Tibet and religious freedom and true minority rights for the Tibetan people in other neighbouring Chinese provinces;
Kako si bo Svet prizadeval, da bi obnovil pogajanja med kitajsko vlado in njegovo svetostjo dalajlamo?
What actions will the Council take in order to resume negotiations between the Chinese Government and His Holiness the Dalai Lama?
Katere ukrepe je Svet sprejel na podlagi resolucije Evropskega parlamenta?
In which ways did the Council follow up on the resolution by the European Parliament?
S katerimi ukrepi je Svet ugotavljal odgovornost za prekinitev pogajanj?
What actions did the Council take to ascertain responsibility for the breakdown of the negotiations?
Ali meni, da je tibetanski memorandum o dejanski avtonomiji tibetanskega naroda predlog za dejansko avtonomijo (kot trdi tibetanska vlada v izgnanstvu) ali za navidezno avtonomijo (kot trdi kitajska vlada)?
In particular does it consider that the Tibetan ‘Memorandum on Genuine Autonomy for the Tibetan People’ is a proposal for genuine autonomy (as asserted by the Tibetan Government in Exile) or for ‘disguised independence’ (as asserted by the Chinese Government)?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0012/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0012/09
Kako si bo Komisija prizadevala, da bi obnovila pogajanja med kitajsko vlado in njegovo svetostjo dalajlamo?
What actions will the Commission take in order to resume negotiations between the Chinese Government and His Holiness the Dalai Lama?
Katere ukrepe je Komisija sprejela na podlagi resolucije Evropskega parlamenta?
In which ways did the Commission follow up on the resolution by the European Parliament?
S katerimi ukrepi je Komisija ugotavljala odgovornost za prekinitev pogajanj?
What actions did the Commission take to ascertain responsibility for the breakdown of the negotiations?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0013/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0013/09
Zadeva: Analiza časa vožnje in časa počitka (uredba (ES) št. 561/2006)
Subject: Evaluation of driving hours and rest periods (Regulatgion(EC) No 561/2006)
Od leta 2006 veljata uredba (ES) št. 561/2006 in direktiva 2006/22/ES o času vošnje in času počitka.
Since 2006 both Regulation(EC) No 561/2006 and Directive 2006/22/EC on driving hours and rest periods leave applied.
Ta zakonodaja zelo podrobno določa usklajene predpise za izboljšanje varnosti v cestnem prometu in socialno zaščito voznikov tovornjakov ter za zagotovitev enakih pogojev za avtoprevoznike v Evropi.
This legislation provides, in a large degree of detail, harmonised rules aiming to improve road safety and social protection for truck drivers, and to guarantee a level playing field for road hauliers in Europe.
Zakonodaja o času vožnje in času počitka je bila v prvih letih od začetka veljavnosti deležna nemalo kritike med avtoprevozniki in vozniki tovornjakov.
In its first years of existence, the legislation on driving hours and rest periods has received a considerable amount of criticism, among both road hauliers and truck drivers.
Kritizirani so številni vidiki od omejene prilagodljivosti, neživljenjskih ali nejasnih predpisov, različnih interpretacij in prekomernih kazni za sorazmerno majhne kršitve vse do nenehnih težav z digitalnim tahografom.
A number of aspects is being criticised, ranging from limited flexibility, impractical or unclear provisions, differing interpretations and excessive fines for relatively minor infringements, not to mention the enduring problems with the digital tachograph.
Komisija je objavila nekatere smernice o teh težavah, vendar imajo te smernice v praksi omejen učinek.
The Commission has published some guidelines on these problems, but in practice these guidelines have limited effect.
Sedanja zakonodaja na žalost ne vsebuje določb o temeljiti analizi časa vožnje in časa počitka.
In the current legislation, there is unfortunately no provision included on a thorough evaluation of the driving hours and rest periods.
Glede na težave v zvezi z obliko, interpretacijami in izvajanjem sedanjih predpisov bi bila analiza v letu 2009 izjemno koristna, hkrati pa bi to bilo najmanj, kar lahko Evropa stori, da bi svojim državljanom in podjetjem pokazala, da njihove težave jemlje resno.
Considering the problems regarding the way the current provisions are set up, interpreted and enforced, an evaluation in 2009 would be extremely useful and the least Europe could do to show its citizens and companies that it is taking their concerns seriously.
Kaj je Komisija do zdaj storila, da bi omilila težave, ki nastajajo zaradi sedanje zakonodaje?
What has the Commission done so far to reduce the problems from the current legislation?
UL L 102, 11.4.2006, str.
OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0014/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0014/09
Zadeva: Vmesni sporazum s Turkmenistanom
Subject: Interim agreement with Turkmenistan
Komisija je Evropski parlament zaprosila za mnenje v zvezi z vprašanjem, ali naj EU podpiše vmesni trgovinski sporazum med EU in Turkmenistanom.
The Commission has asked the European Parliament to give an opinion on the question whether the EU should sign the Interim Trade Agreement between the EU and Turkmenistan.
Zaradi katerih konkretnih vzrokov Svet meni, da je prav zdaj upravičeno podpisati vmesni trgovinski sporazum?
What are the concrete reasons for which the Council considers it justified to sign the ITA now?
Zakaj želi Svet nadaljevati ta postopek, upoštevajoč splošne razmere v Turkmenistanu?
Why does the Council want to continue with this process, taking into account the general situation in Turkmenistan?
Kakšni so komentarji Sveta na več poročil nevladnih organizacij in prebivalcev Turkmenistana o razmerah v državi?
What comments does the Council have to make on the various reports by NGOs and people living in Turkmenistan on the situation in the country?
Kako bo vmesni trgovinski sporazum konkretno izboljšal odnose med EU in Turkmenistanom?
What concrete improvements will the ITA make to the relationship between the EU and Turkmenistan?
Kako bi lahko vmesni trgovinski sporazum konkretno izboljšal razmere v Turkmenistanu, zlasti v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami in demokracijo?
What concrete improvements may the ITA make to the situation in Turkmenistan, especially concerning human rights and democracy?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0015/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0015/09
Zaradi katerih konkretnih vzrokov Komisija meni, da je prav zdaj upravičeno podpisati vmesni trgovinski sporazum?
What are the concrete reasons for which the Commission considers it justified to sign the ITA now?
Zakaj želi Komisija nadaljevati ta postopek, upoštevajoč splošne razmere v Turkmenistanu?
Why does the Commission want to continue with this process, taking into account the general situation in Turkmenistan?
Kakšni so komentarji Komisije na več poročil nevladnih organizacij in prebivalcev Turkmenistana o razmerah v državi?
What comments does the Commission have to make on the various reports by NGOs and people living in Turkmenistan on the situation in the country?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0016/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0016/09
Zadeva: Splošno posvetovanje z državljani EU
Subject: General consultations of EU citizens
EU dinamično povečuje svoja pooblastila in dejavnosti; z lizbonsko pogodbo bo dobila še dodaten zagon.
The EU is increasing its powers and activities through a dynamic process to which the Treaty of Lisbon will give additional impetus.
Nasprotno pa raziskave in znanstvene študije vztrajno kažejo, da ni neposrednega stika z državljani, ki ukrepe in dejavnosti EU dojemajo kot oddaljene in nerazumljive.
By contrast, surveys and scientific studies constantly demonstrate a lack of direct contact with citizens, who perceive the policies and activities of the EU as remote and unintelligible.
Mediji in nacionalne politične stranke namenjajo EU le malo pozornosti.
The EU receives only marginal attention from the media and national political parties.
Zaradi tega EU grozi močan upad legitimnosti v očeh javnosti; resno opozorilo je dejstvo, da število volivcev že nekaj časa pada.
As a result, the EU faces a strong decline in popular legitimacy, of which the series of setbacks in terms of popular vote are a strong warning signal.
To je grožnja evropski demokraciji in politični prihodnosti EU.
This risks posing a major threat to European democracy and the political future of the EU.
Učinek tega dialoga pa je žalost še vedno, tako posredno kot neposredno, omejen na okrog 50.000 državljanov.
Unfortunately this dialogue still has a limited impact, whether direct or indirect, on some 50 000 citizens.
Zato je do vzpostavitve prostora za javno razpravo in za resničen evropski dialog, ki bo sposoben vzbuditi zanimanje državljanov EU, še daleč.
We are therefore very far away from creating a space for public debate and genuine European dialogue capable of stimulating the interest of EU citizens.
Učinkovit način oblikovanja takšnega evropskega javnega prostora bi bila lahko organizacija splošnih posvetovanj z evropskimi državljani.
An efficient means to create such a European public space could be the organisation of general consultations of European citizens.
Nekdanji predsednik Parlamenta Pat Cox je ob zaključku zadnjega kongresa evropskega gibanja v Haagu odločno pozval k sprejetju takšnih ukrepov.
A strong call for such action was made by former Parliament President Pat Cox at the close of the last Congress of the European Movement in The Hague.
Cox je vztrajal na tem, da je treba prelomiti začarani krog dialoga, ki doseže le elite.
Mr Cox insisted on the need to break out of the vicious circle of a dialogue that reaches only the elites.
Ali je Komisija pripravljena oblikovati strategijo za uvedbo splošnega dialoga z državljani, ki si bo za izrecen cilj zastavila doseganje milijonov državljanov?
Is the Commission ready to prepare a strategy to develop a general dialogue with citizens, with the explicit aim of reaching millions of citizens?