natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Po bolgarskem pravu lahko telefonsko prisluškovanje zahtevajo le državni tožilci ali različni organi odkrivanja in pregona (kot so policija, agencija za nacionalno varnost itd), če sumijo, da je zadevna oseba vpletena v kriminalno dejavnost, in zatem, ko pridobijo dovoljenje sodnika.
Under Bulgarian law, phone tapping can only be requested by public prosecutors or by various law enforcement agencies (such as the police, the national security agency, etc.) if they suspect that the person in question is involved in criminal activity and after authorisation by a judge.
Zakon o uporabi posebnih obveščevalnih sredstev določa, da je ta sredstva mogoče uporabiti le za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu in za zaščito nacionalne varnosti.
The law on the use of special intelligence means stipulates that these can be used only in order to fight organised crime or to protect national security.
V vsakem primeru je treba zbrane informacije varovati kot tajne in jih je mogoče uporabiti le za namene, določene v zakonu.
In either case, the information collected is to be kept secret and used only for the purposes laid down in the law.
Vendar so primeri, v katerih ni jasno, ali je bilo pridobljeno uradno sodno dovoljenje za uporabo posebnih obveščevalnih sredstev in ali so bile informacije, ki so bile pridobljene s takimi metodami, namerno namesto pristojnim institucijam poslane sredstvom javnega obveščanja.
However, there are cases where it is not clear whether official judicial authorisation has been given to use SIMs and where information acquired by SIMs has been deliberately sent to the media rather than to the relevant institutions responsible.
V številnih primerih prisluškovanja gre za očitne politične manipulacije s strani znanih in neznanih družbenih sil in drugih dejavnikov v kontekstu volilne kampanje, ki je v teku.
In many of the cases of eavesdropping there are obvious political manipulations by known and unknown forces of society and other factors against the background of the election campaign that is currently under way.
Bolgarska družba tudi nima zaščite urada za nadzor posebnih obveščevalnih sredstev, ki ga je izvolil prejšnji parlament in razpustil ta parlament.
Bulgarian society even lacks the protection of the SIM supervisory bureau that was elected by the previous parliament and closed down by the current one.
Ali se Komisija strinja z dejstvom, da gre v teh razmerah za kršitev obveznosti EU, kar zadeva človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine ter pravico do zasebnosti, kakor so določene v EKČP in listini o temeljnih pravicah?
Does the Commission not agree that this situation is in breach of EU obligations in terms of human rights and fundamental freedoms and the right to privacy, as enshrined in the ECHR and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000012/2011
Question for oral answer O-000012/2011
v imenu Odbora za mednarodno trgovino Zadeva: Sklenitev Ženevskega sporazuma o trgovini z bananami
on behalf of the Committee on International Trade Subject: The conclusion of a Geneva Agreement on Trade in Bananas
Ali bo Svet zagotovil, da se bo za Parlament pripravilo posebno poročilo in po potrebi priložili ustrezni predlogi v primeru, da bi se gospodarske razmere tako spremenile, da bi ogrozile preživetje pridelovalcev banan, tudi tistih v najbolj oddaljenih regijah in iz držav AKP?
Will the Council ensure that, in the event of a deterioration in the economic conditions affecting the livelihoods of EU banana producers – including those of its outermost regions – and those of the ACP countries, there will be a specific report to Parliament, accompanied, where necessary, by appropriate proposals?
Kako bo Svet zagotovil sprejetje posebnih pobud, ki bi okrepile tržni položaj pridelovalcev banan znotraj različnih verig dobave?
How will the Council ensure that specific initiatives are taken to strengthen the commercial position of banana growers within the various supply chains?
Ali se Svet strinja, da je treba vire iz spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane dodeljevati po državah glede na pričakovano izgubo izvoza banan in proizvodnjo skupaj s stopnjo razvoja posamezne države, ponderirane kazalnike in trgovino z bananami v EU?
Does the Council agree that the resources from the Banana Accompanying Measures (BAM) should be allocated across countries according to the expected losses in terms of banana exports and production together with each country’s level of development, weighted indicators and the trade in bananas with the EU?
Ali bo Svet poskrbel, da bo čim prej pripravil oceno učinka sporazumov do leta 2020 na te države v razvoju in na najbolj oddaljene regije Evrope, ki proizvajajo banane?
Will the Council ensure that it draws up, at the earliest opportunity, an impact assessment on the effects of the agreements on those developing countries and European outermost regions which produce bananas until 2020?
Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da bodo sredstva iz spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane in programa izbir, ki je specifičen za oddaljenost in otoško lego (POSEI), zadostovala za pomoč pridelovalcem banan v državah AKP in EU, da se prilagodijo posledicam sprememb uvoznega režima EU?
How will the Council ensure that both the BAM and the POSEI envelopes will be sufficient to help ACP and EU banana producers adjust and adapt to the effects of changes to the EU’s import regime?
Ali bo Svet zagotovil, da se bo 18 mesecev pred potekom programa opravila ocena spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane?
Will the Council ensure that an assessment of the BAM will be done 18 months before the programme expires?
Kako namerava Svet odobriti Ekvadorju iste cene kot njegovim glavnim konkurentom?
How does the Council envisage granting Ecuador the same tariffs as its main competitors?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000013/2011
Question for oral answer O-000013/2011
Ali bo Komisija Parlamentu pripravila posebno poročilo in po potrebi priložila ustrezne predloge v primeru, da bi se gospodarske razmere tako spremenile, da bi ogrozile preživetje pridelovalcev banan, tudi tistih v najbolj oddaljenih regijah in iz držav AKP?
Will the Commission ensure that, in the event of a deterioration in the economic conditions affecting the livelihoods of EU banana producers – including those of its outermost regions – and those of the ACP countries, it will submit a specific report to Parliament, accompanied, where necessary, by appropriate proposals?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila sprejetje posebnih pobud, ki bi okrepile tržni položaj pridelovalcev banan znotraj različnih verig dobave?
How will the Commission ensure that specific initiatives are taken to strengthen the commercial position of banana growers within the various supply chains?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je treba vire iz spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane dodeljevati po državah glede na pričakovano izgubo izvoza banan in proizvodnjo skupaj s stopnjo razvoja posamezne države, ponderirane kazalnike in trgovino z bananami v EU?
Does the Commission agree that the resources from the Banana Accompanying Measures (BAM) should be allocated across countries according to the expected losses in terms of banana exports and production together with each country’s level of development, weighted indicators and the trade in bananas with the EU?
Ali bo Komisija zagotovila, da bo čim prej pripravila oceno učinka sporazumov do leta 2020 na te države v razvoju in na najbolj oddaljene regije Evrope, ki proizvajajo banane?
Will the Commission ensure that it draws up, at the earliest opportunity, an impact assessment on the effects of the agreements on those developing countries and European outermost regions which produce bananas until 2020?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo sredstva iz spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane in programa izbir, ki je specifičen za oddaljenost in otoško lego (POSEI), zadostovala za pomoč pridelovalcem banan v državah AKP in EU, da se prilagodijo posledicam sprememb uvoznega režima EU?
How will the Commission ensure that both the BAM and the POSEI envelopes will be sufficient to help ACP and EU banana producers adjust and adapt to the effects of changes to the EU’s import regime?
Ali bo Komisija zagotovila, da se 18 mesecev pred potekom programa opravi ocena spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane?
Will the Commission ensure that an assessment of the BAM will be carried out 18 months before the programme expires?
Kako namerava Komisija odobriti Ekvadorju iste cene kot njegovim glavnim konkurentom?
How does the Commission envisage granting Ecuador the same tariffs as its main competitors?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000014/2011
Question for oral answer O-000014/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Strategija EU za Podonavje
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: EU Strategy for the Danube Region
Komisija je 8. decembra 2010 sprejela sporočilo in akcijski načrt za podonavsko strategijo Evropske unije (EUSDR).
The Commission adopted its communication and action plan on the European Union Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR) on 8 December 2010.
Podonavje se razteza čez 14 držav, vključno z osmimi državami članicami EU, v njem pa živi okrog 115 milijonov ljudi.
The Danube region encompasses parts of 14 countries, including eight EU Member States, and links some 115 million people.
Glede na to, da je večina izzivov, s katerimi se ta regija spopada, med seboj tesno povezanih, je izjemno pomembno sodelovati na makroregionalni ravni, če želimo čim bolj učinkovito izkoristiti njen neznanski razvojni potencial.
Given that most of the challenges it faces are closely interconnected, coordinated cooperation within a macroregion structure is of the utmost importance, in order to ensure the most efficient use of its huge development potential.
Kako bo po mnenju Komisije podonavska strategija prispevala k ponovnemu zagonu trajnostnega razvoja v državah, ki bodo v njej dejavno sodelovale?
In the Commission’s view, how will the strategy contribute to the re-launch of sustainable development in the countries actively participating in it?
Okoljski viri ne poznajo meja, njihov pomen pa presega interese posameznih držav.
Environmental resources know no borders and their importance extends beyond the interests of single states.
Podonavje ima izjemno bogate in raznolike ekosisteme, zato je treba posvetiti večjo pozornost okoljevarstvu.
The Danube region has exceptionally rich and versatile ecosystems; consequently, increased attention to environmental protection is crucial.
Ali lahko Komisija podrobno pojasni, kaj lahko v zvezi s tem prispeva podonavska strategija?
Can the Commission detail what the Danube Strategy has to offer in this respect?
Z uporabo neporabljenih sredstev (npr. sredstev Kohezijskega sklada iz nacionalnih proračunov) bi lahko bistveno podprli izvajanje strategije in ji zagotovili dodano vrednost, saj bi tako vse sodelujoče države skupaj izkoristile te možnosti financiranja, ki temeljijo na že obstoječih virih.
Making use of unspent funding (e.g. from the Cohesion Fund, within the national envelopes) would significantly support, and add value to, the strategy’s realisation, as all the participating countries could jointly exploit this funding potential based on already existing resources.
Kaj Komisija meni o možnosti prerazporeditve neporabljenih sredstev EU iz EUSDR?
What is the Commission’s approach to the possibility of transferring into the EUSDR EU funding that has not been taken up?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000015/2011
Question for oral answer O-000015/2011
21. januarja 2011 je veliki senat Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice razglasil dolgo pričakovano sodbo v primeru M.S.S. proti Belgiji in Grčiji (vloga št. 30696/09).
On 21 January 2011 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) rendered its long-awaited judgment in the case of M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece (application no.
V skladu s sodbo Sodišča država članica, v tem primeru Belgija, krši (med drugim člena 3 in 13) Evropske listine o človekovih pravicah, če prosilce za azil izpostavlja azilnemu postopku v Grčiji.
According to the Court's ruling, a Member State, in casu Belgium, violates (inter alia Articles 3 and 13 of) the ECHR if it exposes asylum seekers to an asylum procedure in Greece.
V zvezi z zgoraj navedenim:
With regard to the aforementioned:
– Ali lahko Svet, ob upoštevanju (pravne) zaveze EU, da bo pristopila k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah, in tekočega delovanja vseh institucij EU v tem postopku, jasno izrazi svoje stališče glede pomena pravnega okvira Evropske listine o človekovih pravicah in sodb Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice?
– Can the Council, taking into account the (legal) commitment of the EU to accede to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the ongoing work of all the EU institutions in this process, clearly denote its stance on the significance of the ECHR legal framework and the rulings of the ECtHR?
– Ali lahko Svet jasno navede, kakšen vpliv bo zgoraj navedena sodba imela na delovanje uredbe "Dublin II", ob upoštevanju, da bo zdaj vsak izgon iz držav članic v Grčijo pomenil kršenje Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah?
– Can the Council indicate clearly what impact the abovementioned judgment will have on the functioning of the 'Dublin II' Regulation, bearing in mind that currently any expulsion by Member States to Greece will constitute a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms?
– Ali se Svet strinja z mnenjem, da sodba Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice kaže na slabo delovanje uredbe "Dublin II"?
– Does the Council concur with the opinion that the ECtHR judgment shows that the 'Dublin II' Regulation is dysfunctional?
Če se ne strinja, ali se lahko Svet jasno izreče, če meni, da uredba "Dublin II" deluje v skladu s svojim namenom?
If not, can the Council clearly enunciate if it deems that the 'Dublin II' Regulation is functioning according to its purpose?
– Ali lahko Svet jasno navede, če meni, da uredba "Dublin II" v celoti izraža načelo solidarnosti med državami članicami, kakor je razglašeno v členu 67(2) PDEU?
– Can the Council clearly state if it considers that the 'Dublin II' Regulation fully reflects the principle of solidarity among Member States, as promulgated in Article 67 (2) TFEU?
Če je tako, ali Svet torej meni, da je trenutni "sistem dodeljevanja" v celoti v skladu s tem načelom in ne zahteva nobene spremembe?
If so, does the Council then consider that the current 'system of allocation' is therefore fully in line with this principle and does not require any change?
– Ali namerava Svet prilagoditi trenutna pogajanja o prenovitvi uredbe Dublin II glede na sodbo Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice?
– Is it the intention of the Council to adjust the current negotiations on the recast of the Dublin II Regulation in the light of the ECtHR judgment?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000016/2011
Question for oral answer O-000016/2011
– Ali lahko Komisija, ob upoštevanju (pravne) zaveze EU, da pristopi k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah, in dela vseh institucij EU, ki poteka v tem postopku, jasno izrazi svoje stališče glede pomena pravnega okvira Evropske listine o človekovih pravicah in sodb Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice?
– Can the Commission, taking into account the (legal) commitment of the EU to accede to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the ongoing work of all the EU institutions in this process, clearly denote its stance on the significance of the ECHR legal framework and the rulings of the ECtHR?
– Ali lahko Komisija jasno navede, kakšen vpliv bo zgoraj navedena sodba imela na delovanje uredbe "Dublin II", ob upoštevanju, da bo glede na sodbo zdaj vsak izgon iz držav članic v Grčijo pomenil kršenje Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah?
– Can the Commission indicate clearly what impact the abovementioned judgment will have on the functioning of the 'Dublin II' Regulation, bearing in mind that, in the light of the judgment, currently any expulsion by Member States to Greece will constitute a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms?
– Ali se Komisija strinja z mnenjem, da sodba Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice kaže na slabo delovanje uredbe "Dublin II"?
– Does the Commission concur with the opinion that the ECtHR judgment shows that the 'Dublin II' Regulation is dysfunctional?
Če se ne strinja, ali se lahko Komisija jasno izreče, če meni, da uredba "Dublin II" deluje v skladu s svojim namenom?
If not, can the Commission clearly enunciate if it deems that the 'Dublin II' Regulation is functioning according to its purpose?
– Glede na dejstvo, da zgoraj navedena sodba de facto prepoveduje državam članicam, da izročijo prosilce za azil Grčiji, ali lahko Komisija navede, kateri postopek, na primer "določbo o prenosu suverenosti", bi morale države članice upoštevati?
– Given the fact that the aforementioned judgment de facto bars Member States from expelling asylum seekers to Greece, can the Commission indicate which procedure, e.g. 'the sovereignty clause', the Member States should follow?
– Ali lahko Komisija jasno navede, ali meni, da uredba "Dublin II" v celoti izraža načelo solidarnosti med državami članicami, kakor je razglašeno v členu 67(2) PDEU?
– Can the Commission clearly state if it considers that the 'Dublin II' Regulation fully reflects the principle of solidarity among Member States, as promulgated in Article 67 (2) TFEU?
Če je tako, ali Komisija torej meni, da je trenutni "sistem dodeljevanja" popolnoma v skladu s tem načelom in ne zahteva nobene spremembe?
If so, does the Commission then consider that the current 'system of allocation' is therefore fully in line with this principle and does not require any change?
Če ni tako, kako namerava Komisija to načelo izvesti v skupnem evropskem azilnem sistemu?
If not, how does the Commission intend to implement this principle into the common European asylum system?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000017/2011
Question for oral answer O-000017/2011
v imenu Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje Zadeva: Prihodnost strategije Evropa 2020 na področju kulture, izobraževanja in mladine
on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education Subject: The future of the EU 2020 Strategy in the fields of culture, education and youth
V delovnem programu Komisije za leto 2011 primanjkuje strateških pobud na področju izobraževanja, kulture, mladine, avdiovizualnih medijev in športa, čeprav so glavni cilji strategije Evropa 2020 okrepitev izobraževanja in vseživljenjskega učenja ter kulturne politike.
The Commission Work Programme 2011 shows a lack of strategic initiatives in the fields of education, culture, youth, the audiovisual sector and sport, despite the fact that the main objectives of the EU 2020 strategy are to strengthen education and lifelong learning, as well as cultural policy.
Glede na proračun EU za leto 2011 se zdi, da je manj zanimanja za obstoječe večletne programe, ki naj bi jih revidirali v letu 2011.
The EU budget 2011 seems to confirm that there is less interest in existing multiannual programmes, which are expected to be reviewed in 2011.
S katerimi konkretnimi ukrepi namerava Svet zagotoviti oblikovanje učinkovitejših programov z ustreznim proračunskim okvirom?
What concrete measures does the Council intend to take to guarantee the development of more efficient programmes with an appropriate budgetary framework?
Ali lahko Svet pojasni predvideno vlogo načela „Evropa znanja“ in zlasti vlogo večletnih programov v okviru strategije Evropa 2020?
Can the Council explain the role that will be given to the 'Europe of Knowledge' principle and, in particular, to the multiannual programmes in the framework of the EU 2020 Strategy?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000018/2011
Question for oral answer O-000018/2011
Ali lahko Komisija odgovori na naslednja vprašanja v zvezi z večletnimi programi za obdobje 2013-2020?
In view of the new multiannual programmes for the period 2013-2020, can the Commission answer the following:
S katerimi konkretnimi ukrepi namerava zagotoviti oblikovanje učinkovitejših programov z ustreznim proračunskim okvirom?
What concrete measures does it intend to take to guarantee the development of more efficient programmes with an appropriate budgetary framework?
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi, da pobuda „Mladi in mobilnost“ ne bo spodkopala ali nadomestila obstoječih večletnih programov, in podrobno opiše vsebino in glavne cilje te pobude?
Can the Commission ensure that the 'Youth on the Move' initiative will not undermine or replace the existing multiannual programmes, and describe in detail its content and main goals?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000019/2011
Question for oral answer O-000019/2011
v imenu Odbora za razvoj Zadeva: Energetska strategija Svetovne banke za države v razvoju
on behalf of the Committee on Development Subject: The World Bank's Energy Strategy for developing countries
Skupina Svetovne banke pripravlja novo energetsko strategijo, ki naj bi bila predvidoma zaključena sredi leta 2011.
The World Bank Group (WBG) is preparing a new Energy Strategy, expected to be finalized in mid-2011.
Za to strategijo se pričakuje, da bo izpolnila svojo nalogo zmanjšanja revščine, tako da bo državam v razvoju pomagala izpolniti njihove potrebe po energiji na način, ki bo spoštoval „trojno spodnjo mejo“ trajnosti: okoljsko, družbeno in gospodarsko.
The new WBG Energy Strategy is called upon to fulfil its mandate of poverty reduction by helping developing countries meet their energy needs in a manner that respects the ‘triple bottom line’ of sustainability: environmentally, socially, and economically.
Kateri so glavni ukrepi, ki jih je predvidel Svet, da bi z možnostmi za uporabo energije iz obnovljivih virov na dosegljiv način pomagal revnim na podeželju?
What are the main actions envisaged by the Council to contribute with renewable energy options to the rural poor in an affordable way?
In končno, ali se Svet – da bi zaščitil skladnost s strateškimi cilji EU za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov – strinja s priporočilom Evropskega parlamenta, da bi morala Evropska investicijska banka sprejeti strategijo za povečanje svoje podpore čisti energiji in za postopno ukinitev svoje podpore projektom v zvezi s fosilnimi gorivi, z izjemo projektov, ki so posebej namenjeni zagotavljanju koristi in dostopa do energije za revne?
Finally, and in order to safeguard the coherence with the EU’s strategic goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, does the Council agree with the recommendation by the European Parliament that the European Investment Bank should adopt a strategy to increase its support for clean energy and phase out its support for fossil fuel projects, with the exception of projects specifically aimed at providing benefits and access to energy for the poor?
Če je tako, kako namerava prispevati k temu priporočilu?
If so, how does it envisage contributing to this recommendation?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000020/2011
Question for oral answer O-000020/2011
Za strategijo se pričakuje, da bo izpolnila svojo nalogo zmanjšanja revščine, tako da bo državam v razvoju pomagala izpolniti njihove potrebe po energiji na način, ki bo spoštoval „trojno spodnjo mejo“ trajnosti: okoljsko, družbeno in gospodarsko.
The strategy is called upon to fulfil its mandate of poverty reduction by helping developing countries meet their energy needs in a manner that respects the ‘triple bottom line’ of sustainability: environmentally, socially, and economically.
Kako namerava Komisija prispevati k tej strategiji z dosegljivimi možnostmi uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov za revne?
How is the Commission going to contribute to this Strategy by bringing renewable energy options to the rural poor in an affordable way?