natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali Komisija namerava pridobiti dovoljenje Sveta za reševanje tega vprašanja na pogajanjih (predvidoma aprila 2012) za sklenitev sporazumov o poenostavitvi vizumskih postopkov z Marokom, Egiptom in Tunizijo?
Is the Commission prepared to seek authorisation from the Council to address this issue in the negotiations for the conclusion of agreements on facilitating the issuing of visas with Morocco, Egypt and Tunisia (scheduled for April 2012) ?
Ali je pripravljena predlagati poenostavitev izdajanja vizumov v okviru revizije (predvidoma decembra 2012) Direktive Sveta 2004/114/ES z dne 13. decembra 2004 o pogojih za sprejem državljanov tretjih držav za namene študija, izmenjav učencev, neplačanega usposabljanja ali prostovoljnega dela ?
Is the Commission prepared to propose making the issuing of visas easier as part of the review of Council Directive 2004/114/EC of 13 December 2004 on the conditions of admission of third-country nationals for the purposes of studies, pupil exchange, unremunerated training or voluntary service (scheduled for December 2012) ?
UL L 375, 23.12.2004, str.
OJ L 375 du 23.12.2004, p.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000050/2012/rev.1
Question for oral answer O-000050/2012
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Strategija za Črno morje
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Black Sea Strategy
EU je leta 2007 sprožila pobudo „sinergija Črnega morja“, v kateri je črnomorsko območje opredelila kot strateško pomembno za EU in pokazala, da je odločena okrepiti svojo vključenost vanj.
In 2007 the EU launched the Black Sea Synergy (BSS), qualifying the region as strategically important for the EU and demonstrating the EU’s resolve to strengthen its involvement in the region.
Vendar se izvajanje pobude od leta 2008 ni veliko izboljšalo, prav tako ni jasnega, celovitega ter posodobljenega poročanja o izvajanju sinergije Črnega morja, delovanje EU v regiji pa zaznamujejo slaba prepoznavnost in razdrobljeni finančni viri.
Since 2008, however, there have been few improvements as regards implementation, there has been no clear, comprehensive and updated reporting on implementation of the BSS, and EU action in the region has lacked visibility and the financial resources available have been fragmented.
Parlament je 17. januarja 2008 sprejel resolucijo o pristopu k regionalni politiki za Črno morje , v kateri je pozval, naj se sinergija Črnega morja nadgradi v strategijo za Črno morje.
In 2008, Parliament adopted a resolution on a Black Sea Regional Policy Approach calling for the BSS to be upgraded to a Black Sea Strategy.
20. januarja 2011 je Parlament sprejel še eno resolucijo o strategiji EU za Črno morje , v kateri je predlagal številna priporočila.
On 20 January 2011, Parliament adopted a further resolution, on an EU Strategy for the Black Sea , issuing a series of recommendations.
Zadevno poročilo je Komisija toplo pozdravila in izjavila, da se zavezuje pripraviti strategijo za Črno morje.
The relevant report was warmly welcomed by the Commission, which said that it was committed to preparing a Black Sea Strategy.
Ali Komisija pripravlja skupno poročilo o trenutnem stanju izvajanja sinergije Črnega morja, ki bi posodobilo njeno poročilo iz leta 2008?
Is the Commission working on a global report on the current state of implementation of the Black Sea Synergy that would update its 2008 report?
Ali pripravlja strategijo EU za Črno morje?
Is the Commission working on drafting an EU strategy for the Black Sea with a primary focus on an action plan setting out concrete objectives, priority actions and benchmarks?
Ali lahko navede rezultate ukrepov, sprejetih za zagotovitev finančnih in človeških virov, potrebnih za pripravo in izvajanje strategije za Črno morje?
Could it say what has been the outcome of the measures adopted in order to ensure the provision of appropriate financial and human resources for the drafting and implementation of the Black Sea Strategy?
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0025 .
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0025 .
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000051/2012
Question for oral answer O-000051/2012
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Poziv k uravnoteženi zastopanosti spolov v izvršnem odboru ECB
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Call for gender-balanced representation on the ECB executive board
Kljub temu pa države članice z imenovanjem v nekatere izmed najpomembnejših in najvplivnejših organov v institucijah EU ustvarjajo grozljivo monoton nabor kandidatov.
Yet the EU Member States’ nominations to some of the most important and influential bodies of EU institutions result in an appallingly monotonous line-up of nominees.
Tu ne gre za dvom v sposobnosti sedanjih kandidatov, ampak za vprašanje, ali morda obstaja sistemska napaka v postopku, če so rezultati nenehno slabi, ko gre za imenovanje kandidatk.
It is not a question of doubting the present candidates’ competency, but a question of whether there may be a systematic failure of the process when the results are continuously so poor when it comes to nominating women candidates.
Kako si bo Svet prizadeval za bolj uravnoteženo zastopanost spolov v svetu ECB, izvršnem odboru in razširjenem svetu ECB?
How will the Council work towards more gender-balanced representation on the Governing Council, the Executive Board and the General Council of the ECB?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000052/2012
Question for oral answer O-000052/2012
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Biometrični potni listi
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Biometric passports
Leta 2004 sprejeta Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2252/2004 o standardih za varnostne značilnosti in biometrične podatke v potnih listih in potovalnih dokumentih, ki jih izdajo države članice, je bila pomemben korak za zagotovitev varnejših potnih listov ter za vzpostavitev zanesljivejše povezave med potnimi listi in njihovimi imetniki, s čimer naj bi bila zagotovljena večja varnost pred zlorabami potnih listov in potovalnih dokumentov.
The Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States was adopted, in 2004, as an important step to make travel document more secure, and to establish a more reliable link between passports and their holders, ensuring better protection against fraudulent use.
Vendar pojem varnosti potnih listov ne zajema zgolj potnih listov, pač pa celoten proces – od predložitve dokumentov, potrebnih za izdajo potnega lista, do zbiranja biometričnih podatkov ter preverjanja in ugotavljanja istovetnosti na mejnih prehodih.
However, passport security is not confined to the passport itself: the whole process, beginning with the presentation of the documents needed for a passport to be issued, followed by the collection of the biometric data and ending with checking and ‘matching’ at border control posts, is relevant.
Povečanje varnosti potnih listov je brezsmiselno, če se hkrati ne odpravijo šibke točke v drugih delih verige.
It is useless to increase the level of passport security if we continue to allow ‘weak points’ in other parts of the chain.
Evropski parlament je med naknadnim pregledom uredbe leta 2008 opozoril, da je še vedno zelo malo izkušenj pri uporabi teh novih tehnologij in da še vedno obstajajo pomisleki glede:
During the subsequent revision, in 2008, the EP drew attention to the fact that there was still not very much experience in the use of these new technologies, and too many concerns remained regarding:
- zanesljivosti in uporabnosti prstnih odtisov otrok in starejših oseb,
- the reliability and usefulness of fingerprints taken from children and the elderly;
- ravni zaupanja v postopek zbiranja biometričnih podatkov,
- the level of confidence in the process of collecting the biometric data;
- morebitnih pomanjkljivosti v sistemih identifikacije in stopenj napak v posameznih državah članicah ter
- the possible shortcomings in identification systems and the error rates existing in the various Member States;
- različnih dokumentov, ki jih je treba predložiti za pridobitev potnega lista, in načina izdaje teh dokumentov (angleško breeder documents ).
- the existing disparities regarding the documents that must be submitted and the way in which these documents are issued (the so-called ‘breeder documents’).
Zato je bila uvedena klavzula o ponovnem pregledu vsaka tri leta, da bi omogočili izvedbo potrebnih študij (ki jih je Parlament zahteval za posamična področja).
Therefore, a three-year revision clause was introduced, in order to allow the necessary studies (requested by the EP in each of these areas) to take place.
Ali lahko Komisija potrdi, da so rezultati omenjenih študij že na voljo?
Could the Commission confirm whether the results of the requested studies are already available?
Ali namerava glede na težave v nekaterih državah članicah pravila ponovno oceniti?
Is the Commission considering re-evaluating the rules given the problems that appear to exist in several Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000053/2012
Question for oral answer O-000053/2012
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Poziv k uravnoteženi zastopanosti spolov v izvršilnem odboru ECB
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Call for a gender-balanced representation on the ECB executive board
Po vsej Evropski uniji ženske še vedno močno zaostajajo za moškimi po zastopanosti na odgovornih položajih na vseh področjih, zlasti v politiki in poslovnem svetu, pa tudi drugod.
Across the EU, women are still largely outnumbered by men in positions of responsibility in all fields, particularly at the highest levels of politics and business, as well as in other fields.
Evropski politiki in organizacije za pravice žensk nenehno poudarjajo pomen uravnotežene zastopanosti moških in žensk na vplivnih položajih, tako v zasebnem kot v javnem sektorju.
European politicians and women’s rights organisation continually emphasise the importance of balanced representation of men and women in influential positions – be it in the private or the public sphere.
Vsi vemo, da raznolika sestava odborov in vlad zagotavlja večjo usposobljenost in širšo perspektivo.
We all know that diversity in boards and governments ensure broader competence and wider perspectives.
Poleg tega argument, da ni dovolj kvalificiranih kandidatk, danes preprosto ni več verodostojen.
Furthermore, the argument that there are no qualified women candidates to be found simply lacks credibility today.
Premajhna zastopanost žensk na vseh ravneh odločanja v gospodarstvu je zelo zaskrbljujoč problem.
The under-representation of women at all levels of economic decision-making is an alarming problem.
Več držav članic EU je po uspešnem zgledu Norveške iz leta 2005 sprejelo zakonodajne ukrepe za povečanje zastopanosti žensk v upravnih odborih.
Several EU Member States have adopted legislative measures to increase the representation of women in boardrooms, following the successful example set by Norway in 2005.
Kljub temu pa države članice EU z imenovanjem v nekatere od najpomembnejših in najvplivnejših organov v institucijah EU ustvarjajo grozljivo monoton nabor kandidatov.
This notwithstanding, the EU Member States’ nominations to some of the most important and influential bodies of EU institutions result in an appallingly monotonous line-up of nominees.
Eden od očitnih primerov je Evropska centralna banka: v njenem izvršilnem odboru ni ene same ženske – niti v svetu niti v razširjenem svetu.
One apparent example is the European Central Bank (ECB): there is not a single woman on the Bank’s Executive Board – nor even on its Governing Council or General Council.
Tukaj ne gre za sposobnost sedanjih kandidatov, ampak za vprašanje, ali morda obstaja sistemska napaka v postopku, če so rezultati pri imenovanju kandidatk nenehno slabi.
At issue here is not the competence the present candidates, but rather whether there is not a systematic failure in the process itself, given the consistently poor results when it comes to nominating women candidates?
Kako si bo Svet prizadeval za bolj uravnoteženo zastopanost spolov v svetu ECB, njenem izvršilnem odboru in razširjenem svetu?
How will the Council work towards a more gender-balanced representation in the ECB’s Governing Council, Executive Board and General Council?
Ali bo Svet na primer razmislil o sprejetju modela, po katerem bi vsaka država članica v izvršilni odbor ECB imenovala po dva kandidata, moškega in žensko?
Will the Council consider, for example, adopting a model whereby each Member State nominates two candidates, a man and a woman, to the ECB Executive Board?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000054/2012
Question for oral answer O-000054/2012
Eden od očitnih primerov je Evropska centralna banka: v njenem izvršilnem odboru ni ene same ženske – niti v svetu niti v razširjenem svetu.
One apparent example is the European Central Bank (ECB): there is not a single woman on the Banks’ Executive Board – nor even on its Governing Council or General Council.
Tukaj ne gre za sposobnost sedanjih kandidatov, ampak za vprašanje, ali morda obstaja sistemska napaka v postopku, če so rezultati pri imenovanju kandidatk nenehno slabi.
At issue here is not the competence of the present candidates, but rather whether there is not a systematic failure in the process itself, given the consistently poor results when it comes to nominating women candidates.
Kako si bo Komisija prizadevala za bolj uravnoteženo zastopanost spolov v svetu ECB, njenem izvršilnem odboru in razširjenem svetu?
How will the Commission work towards a more gender-balanced representation in the ECB’s Governing Council, Executive Board and General Council?
Ali bo Komisija na primer razmislila o sprejetju modela, po katerem bi vsaka država članica v izvršilni odbor ECB imenovala po dva kandidata, moškega in žensko?
Will the Commission consider, for example, adopting a model whereby each Member State nominates two candidates, a man and a woman, to the ECB Executive Board?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000055/2012
Question for oral answer O-000055/2012
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Neugodne vremenske razmere
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Adverse atmospheric conditions
Ostre vremenske razmere povsod v Evropi vplivajo na kmetijsko proizvodnjo.
Difficult weather conditions have been having an extreme impact on agricultural production throughout Europe.
Pojavi, kot so obilne snežne padavine in suša, ogrožajo pridelavo sadja in zelenjave kot tudi pašo, za to leto pa je predvideno izjemno zmanjšanje pridelka žit za živila in krmo.
Events such as heavy snow and drought have compromised vegetable and fruit production as well as pasture, and cereals for food and feed are expected to have severely reduced yields this year.
Vremenski in podnebni ekstremni pojavi naj bi bili najbolj vidna posledica spreminjajočih se podnebnih razmer, zaradi česar potrebujemo vseobsegajoč pristop za preprečevanje in blažitev, ki ga je treba vključiti v vsa področja politike EU.
Weather and climate extremes are said to constitute the most visible impact of changing climate conditions, thus requiring a holistic approach to prevention and mitigation, as well as mainstreaming across all EU policies.
Ali Komisija namerava dvigniti prag de minimis, da bi se nemudoma odzvali na te razmere in najbolj prizadetim državam izplačali nadomestilo za nastalo škodo?
For the purpose of immediate action, in order to allow the most affected Member States to compensate for the damage caused, will the Commission consider raising the de minimis ceiling?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000056/2012
Question for oral answer O-000056/2012
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Kriza v zelenjadarstvu EU zaradi neugodnih vremenskih razmer
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Crisis in the EU vegetable sector arising from adverse weather conditions
Zelenjadarstvo, zlasti kmetovalci, ki pridelujejo v rastlinjakih, je bilo februarja 2012 v številnih državah članicah hudo prizadeto zaradi neugodnih vremenskih razmer, kot so močni vetrovi, obilica snega in suša.
In February 2012 the vegetable sector, and especially greenhouse operators, in several Member States was heavily affected by adverse weather conditions such as high winds, heavy snow and drought.
Zaradi tega se številni pridelovalci sedaj soočajo s težavami pri nadaljevanju svoje dejavnosti.
As a result, many growers are now experiencing difficulties in continuing their activities.
Zgornja meja de minimis je prenizka, da bi zaščitila panogo.
The de minimis ceiling is too low to safeguard the sector.
Ali Komisija namerava zvišati zgornjo mejo pomoči de minimis s 7 500 EUR na vsaj 15 000 EUR na pridelovalca?
Is the Commission considering raising the de minimis aid ceiling from € 7500 to at least € 15000 per grower?
Katere druge konkretne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi glede na okoliščine pomagala in podprla zelenjadarstvo EU?
What other concrete measures does the Commission intend to take in order to help and support the EU’s vegetable sector in this context?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000057/2012
Question for oral answer O-000057/2012
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Izbruh virusa Schmallenberg
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Schmallenberg outbreak
Ker se bolezen očitno širi z mušicami, se bo najverjetneje razširila na večje območje, ko se bodo spomladi temperature začele dvigovati in se bo začela sezona kotitve jagnjet in telet.
As the disease appears to be spread by midges, it is likely that it will spread further as temperatures in the Spring rise and the lambing and calving seasons begin.
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi ukrepe, ki jih uvaja glede tega izbruha, in svoje načrte, če bi bilo ogroženo javno zdravje?
Can the Commission outline what measures it is taking to address this outbreak and what its plans are should public health concerns arise?
Ali lahko Komisija posebej pojasni, katere ukrepe je doslej sprejela za večji nadzor in usklajenost pri zbiranju podatkov v vseh državah članicah, kot je priporočila Evropska agencija za varnost hrane v svojem predhodnem tehničnem poročilu o virusu Schmallenberg, objavljenem v začetku leta 2012?
Can the Commission explain, in particular, what action it has taken to ensure increased surveillance and the coordination of data collection in all Member States as recommended by EFSA in its preliminary technical report on SBV published in early 2012?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000058/2012
Question for oral answer O-000058/2012
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Položaj migrantov v Grčiji
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Situation of migrants in Greece
Grško-turško kopensko mejo nezakonito prečka izjemno visoko število migrantov, kar je 90 % vseh odkritih primerov nezakonitih prehodov meje v EU leta 2010.
Exceptionally high numbers of migrants illegally cross the Greek-Turkish land border, accounting for 90 % of all detections of illegal border crossings into the EU in 2010.
Z začasno uvedbo RABIT na grško-turški meji leta 2010 se je sprva zmanjšalo število nezakonitih vstopov.
The temporary RABIT deployment at the Greek-Turkish border in 2010 initially decreased the number of illegal entries.
Kljub temu se je po podatkih agencije Frontex število nezakonitih prehodov migrantov v Grčiji hitro povečala v drugi polovici leta 2011 na vse do 350 prehodov na dan.
However, according to Frontex, irregular migrant crossings to Greece showed a rapid increase in the second half of 2011, with up to 350 crossings per day.
Vzrok za to je predvsem vpliv arabske pomladi in dejstvo, da je Turčija odpravila vizume za svoje sosednje države.
This is mainly a result of the impact of the Arab Spring and the fact that Turkey has implemented a visa-free environment for its neighbouring countries.
To je storila, ne da bi izvedla dovolj ukrepov za zaščito svojih zunanjih meja pred nezakonitim in nepravilnim priseljevanjem, trgovanjem z ljudmi in tihotapljenjem ljudi, ki ga izvajajo organizirane kriminalne mreže, pri tem pa niti ne spoštuje sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu.
It has done this without taking sufficient steps to protect its external borders from illegal and irregular immigration and the trafficking and smuggling of human beings by organised crime networks; nor is it complying with readmission agreements.
Te razmere, ki še trajajo, ogrožajo varnost EU.
This ongoing situation is posing a threat to the security of the EU.
Leta 2010 je Grčija sprejela nacionalni akcijski načrt za upravljanje migracij, ki je v določenem obsegu pokazal pozitivne rezultate.
In 2010 Greece adopted a National Action Plan on Migration Management, which has shown positive results to some extent.
Leta 2011 je uvedla nove službe za obravnavo prošenj za azil in začetni sprejem prosilcev.
In 2011 it set up new services to deal with asylum applications and the initial reception of applicants.
Uredba Dublin II po podatkih UNHCR ne uvaja mehanizmov, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev enakopravne delitve odgovornosti.
According to the UNHCR, the Dublin II Regulation does not deploy the necessary mechanisms to ensure that responsibilities are shared in an equitable manner.
Poleg tega UNHCR trdi, da nezakonita prečkanja mej nalagajo nesorazmerno odgovornost državam članicam, zlasti tistim na zunanjih mejah EU.
Furthermore, the UNHCR says that illegal border crossings place a disproportionate responsibility on some Member States, especially those located on the EU’s external borders.
Upravljanje migracijskih tokov zahteva znatne vire in zmogljivosti v težkih finančnih razmerah za Grčijo.
Dealing with migration flows consequently requires substantial resources and capabilities, at a time when Greece faces a difficult financial situation.
Katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi olajšala uporabo sredstev EU grškim oblastem ter zagotavljanje tehnične pomoči na tem področju, da bi zagotovili rešitev za upravljanje migracijskih tokov na ravni celotne Unije?
What measures does the Commission intend to adopt in order to facilitate the absorption of EU funds by the Greek authorities, and to provide technical assistance in this area in order to ensure a Union-wide solution for managing migration flows?
Ali Komisija namerava predlagati pregled uredbe Dublin II, da bi izvedli pravičen in učinkovit sistem, ki bi v celoti zagotavljal spoštovanje človekovih pravic prosilcev za azil v Evropi?
Does the Commission intend to propose a review of the Dublin II Regulation in order to implement a fair and efficient system that would fully guarantee the human rights of asylum-seekers in the EU?
Katere ukrepe bi lahko sprejela Komisija, da bi Turčijo spodbudila k spoštovanju sporazumov o ponovnem sprejetju in učinkovitemu boju turških oblasti proti tihotapljenju ljudi in organiziranemu kriminalu?
What measures could the Commission take to encourage Turkey to comply with readmission agreements, and the Turkish authorities to fight human trafficking and organised crime effectively?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000059/2012
Question for oral answer O-000059/2012
v imenu Odbora za pravne zadeve
on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs
v imenu Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve Zadeva: Izobraževanje pravosodnih organov
on behalf of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Subject: Judicial training
Parlamentarni odbori, pristojni za področje izobraževanja pravosodnih organov, pozdravljajo odziv Komisije na predloge, ki jih je Parlament podal v svojih resolucijah o kazenskopravnem območju EU, o stockholmskem programu in o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov, ter njen predlog za pilotni projekt.
Parliament’s committees having responsibilities in the area of judicial training welcome the Commission’s response to the suggestions set out in Parliament’s resolutions on an EU criminal justice area, the Stockholm programme, and judicial training, and its proposal for a pilot project.
Toda ob upoštevanju členov 81 in 82 PDEU, ki določata, da se po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, torej s polno udeležbo Parlamenta, sprejmejo ukrepi za zagotovitev „pomoči pri usposabljanju sodnikov in sodnega osebja“, postavljamo naslednja vprašanja:
However, bearing in mind that Articles 81 and 82 TFEU provide for the adoption under the ordinary legislative procedure of measures aimed at ensuring ‘support for the training of the judiciary and judicial staff’, and hence for the full involvement of Parliament: