natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zlasti, kako bodo države članice sodelovale s Komisijo pri spodbujanju lokalnih oblasti k boljšemu izkoriščanju priložnosti, ki jih za spodbujanje vključenosti Romov ponuja financiranje iz strukturnih skladov, ob upoštevanju nizke stopnje absorpcije financiranja iz strukturnih in predpristopnih skladov v nekaterih državah članicah in potencialnih državah kandidatkah?
In particular, given the low absorption rate of structural and pre-accession funds in some Member States and (potential) candidate countries, in what way will the Member States work together with the Commission to stimulate local authorities to make better use of structural funding opportunities to promote Roma inclusion?
Ali namerava Svet, zlasti sedanja predsedniška trojka, po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom in ob dejavni vključitvi civilne družbe, predstaviti strateški načrt o vključevanju Romov, vključno s prednostnimi nalogami za obdobje načrtovanja 2014-2020?
Does the Council, in particular the current Presidency trio, intend, in consultation with the European Parliament and actively involving civil society, to present a strategic agenda on Roma inclusion, including priorities for the planning period 2014-2020?
Romi se spopadajo tako z odkrito kot s prikrito diskriminacijo, vključno s skrb zbujajočimi oblikami rasističnega nasilja, sovražnim govorom, segregacijo pri bivanju in izobraževanju ter prisilnimi izselitvami, pa tudi z manj očitno diskriminacijo, kot je neenak dostop do javnih storitev in socialnih prejemkov.
Roma face both explicit and implicit discrimination, including alarming forms of racist violence, hate speech, living and educational segregation and forced evictions, but also less visible discrimination via unequal access to public services and social provisions.
Katere ukrepe predlaga Svet za boj proti odkritim in prikritim oblikam diskriminacije proti Romom?
What measures does the Council propose to tackle both visible and implicit forms of discrimination against Roma?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0029/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0029/10
Drugi evropski vrh o Romih, ki ga špansko predsedstvo organizira 8. aprila 2010 v Cordobi, je priložnost za pregled dosežkov in prepoznavanje prihodnjih izzivov.
The second European Roma summit, hosted by the Spanish Presidency on 8 April 2010 in Cordoba, is an opportunity to review achievements and recognise further challenges.
Do katerih zgodnjih zaključkov je prišla Komisija na podlagi ocen, ki še potekajo?
What preliminary conclusions does the Commission draw from ongoing evaluations in this regard?
Katere ukrepe bo sprejela Komisija, da zagotovi, da pregledi operativnih programov in postopki dodeljevanja virov odražajo prednostne naloge v zvezi s spodbujanjem vključevanja Romov?
What measures will the Commission take to ensure that revisions of operational programmes and source allocation procedures reflect the priority attached to promoting Roma inclusion?
Katera so zakonodajna/regulativna orodja, ki jih lahko uvede Komisija za zagotovitev enakih možnosti Romov pri uporabi sredstev evropskih skladov?
What are the possible legislative/regulative tools to be introduced by the Commission to guarantee (as conditionality) equal opportunities for Roma when European funds are used?
Zlasti, kako bo Komisija spodbudila lokalne oblasti k boljšemu izkoriščanju priložnosti, ki jih za spodbujanje vključevanja Romov ponuja financiranje iz strukturnih skladov, ob upoštevanju nizke stopnje absorpcije financiranja iz strukturnih in predpristopnih skladov v nekaterih državah članicah in (potencialnih) državah kandidatkah?
In particular, given the low absorption rate of structural and pre-accession funds in some Member States and (potential) candidate countries, in what way will the Commission stimulate local authorities to make better use of structural funding opportunities to promote Roma inclusion?
Kako upošteva priporočila, izkušnje in znanje romskih nevladnih organizacij?
In what ways has the Commission taken on board the recommendations, experience and expertise of Roma NGOs?
Ali je Komisija v okviru evropske platforme za vključevanje Romov sprejela ukrepe za predstavitev strateškega časovnega načrta za skladen evropski okvir za vključevanje Romov, kakor je zahteval Evropski parlament?
Has the Commission, in the framework of the EU Roma Platform, taken action to present a strategic timeline towards a coherent European framework for Roma inclusion, as requested by the European Parliament?
Katere ukrepe je po večkratnih zahtevah Parlamenta sprejela za zagotovitev, da notranja organizacija njenih služb odraža znatne izzive na področju usklajevanja in znanja, ki so potrebni za obravnavanje vključevanja Romov?
What actions has the Commission taken, as requested by Parliament on several occasions, to ensure that the internal organisation of its services reflects the considerable coordination and expertise challenges of addressing Roma inclusion?
Katere ukrepe predlaga Komisija za boj proti odkritim in prikritim oblikam diskriminacije Romov?
What measures does the Commission propose to tackle both visible and invisible forms of discrimination against Roma?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0030/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0030/10
Zadeva: Izvajanje direktiv prvega železniškega paketa (2001/12/ES, 2001/13/ES in 2001/14/ES)
Subject: Implementation of the First Railway Package Directives (2001/12/EC, 2001/13/EC and 2001/14/EC)
Tri direktive „prvega železniškega paketa“ (2001/12/ES , 2001/13/ES in 2001/14/ES ) so bile sprejete leta 2001, rok za njihov prenos pa je bil marca 2003.
The three ‘First Railway Package’ Directives (2001/12/EC , 2001/13/EC and 2001/14/EC ) were adopted in 2001, with a deadline of March 2003 for their transposition.
Komisija je v svojem poročilu iz leta 2006 sicer ugotovila, da so države članice te tri direktive uradno prenesle, vendar je oktobra 2009 enaindvajsetim državam članicam poslala obrazložitveno mnenje glede nepravilnega izvajanja direktiv.
In its 2006 report the Commission recognised that Member States had formally transposed the three directives; however, in October 2009 it sent reasoned opinions to 21 Member States regarding their failure to implement the directives properly.
Odbor TRAN zato pred revizijo prvega železniškega paketa leta 2010 izraža globoko zaskrbljenost glede tistih držav članic, ki določb teh direktiv ne izpolnjujejo v celoti, in zastavlja naslednja vprašanja:
In advance of the revision of the first railway package in 2010, the TRAN Committee wishes to express its deep concerns with regard to those Member States which do not fully comply with these directives and has the following questions:
Ali Komisija lahko posreduje konkretne in natančne podatke o tem, katerega vidika direktiv ni izvajala vsaka izmed držav članic?
Can the Commission provide concrete and specific information on which aspect of the directives each Member State has failed to implement?
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni, zakaj države članice niso pravilno izvajale teh direktiv in ali države članice še zmeraj ovirajo lojalno konkurenco na železniškem trgu?
Can the Commission explain why Member States have not correctly implemented these directives and are Member States still preventing fair competition in the railway market?
Kako bo prenovitev po mnenju Komisije olajšala izvajanje prvega železniškega paketa?
How does the Commission think that the recast will facilitate the implementation of the first railway package?
Ali Komisija lahko predloži statistične podatke o razlikah pri uporabninah za dostop in infrastrukturo v teh državah članicah in navede natančnejše podatke o pomanjkanju neodvisnosti upravljavcev železniške infrastrukture in ukrepih, ki jih države članice v zvezi s tem niso sprejele?
Can the Commission provide statistics on the differences in access and infrastructure charges in these Member States and give more precise information about the lack of independence of infrastructure managers and the measures that Member States have failed to take in relation to this?
Kakšne ukrepe bi moralo sprejeti enaindvajset držav članic, da bi regulativnim organom zagotovile dovolj pristojnosti in sredstev?
What actions should the 21 Member States have taken to provide sufficient powers and resources to regulatory bodies?
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni, zakaj je potrebovala pet let, preden je državam članicam poslala uradni opomin, in ali verjame, da je popolno izvajanje prvega železniškega paketa pogoj za nadaljnje odpiranje trgov?
Can the Commission explain why it took five years before formal notices were sent to the Member States and does it believe that the full implementation of the first railway package is a precondition to proceeding with further market openings?
Kakšne ukrepe bo sprejela Komisija proti državam članicam, ki so uvedle nacionalne ukrepe, ki niso skladni s prvim železniškim paketom?
What action will the Commission take against Member States that have introduced national measures which contradict the first railway package?
Kakšno je stanje glede interoperabilnosti čezmejnih tehnologij?
What is the state of play regarding interoperability of cross-border technologies?
Ali lahko Komisija Parlamentu pojasni, kakšen je natančni delež železniškega omrežja EU, ki je skladen s standardi evropskega sistema za vodenje železniškega prometa?
Can the Commission advise Parliament of the exact proportion of the EU rail network which is compatible with ERTMS standards?
UL L 75, 15.3.2001, str.
OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0031/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0031/10
Zadeva: Prisilna vrnitev pripadnikov romske, aškalske in egipčanske skupnosti na Kosovo
Subject: Forced returns of Roma, Ashkali and Egyptian community members to Kosovo
Več držav članic Evropske unije je s Kosovom podpisalo sporazum o ponovnem sprejetju (Belgija, Francija), druge ga izvajajo (Nemčija) oziroma se o njem pogajajo (Avstrija).
Several EU Member States have signed (Belgium, France) or are implementing (Germany) or negotiating (Austria) readmission agreements with Kosovo.
Komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice Thomas Hammarberg je pozval evropske vlade, naj se izogibajo prisilnim vrnitvam manjšin na Kosovo.
The Council of Europe's Commissioner for Human Rights, Thomas Hammarberg, called on European governments to avoid forced returns of minorities to Kosovo.
Po njegovem poročilu se pripadniki romske, aškalske in egipčanske skupnosti po vrnitvi na Kosovo soočajo z marginalizacijo in diskriminacijo pri izobraževanju, socialnem varstvu, zdravstvu in stanovanjskih vprašanjih.
According to his report, members of the Roma, Ashkali and Egyptian communities (RAE) face marginalisation and discrimination in the areas of education, social protection, healthcare and housing once returned to Kosovo.
Varnost teh manjšin je še naprej zaskrbljujoča, o etnično motiviranih incidentih pa še vedno ne poročajo.
Security for these minorities remains a concern and ethnically motivated incidents continue to go unreported.
Skladno s poročilom Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi iz novembra 2009 kosovske institucije ne izpolnjujejo svojih obvez iz Strategije ponovne vključitve vrnjenih oseb.
According to an OSCE report of November 2009, Kosovo institutions fall short of fulfilling their obligations under the Strategy for the Reintegration of Repatriated Persons.
Kot navaja poročilo o širitvi Evropske unije o napredku Kosova iz leta 2009, je romska, aškalska in egipčanska skupnost še vedno diskriminirana.
As stated in the EU enlargement Kosovo Progress Report 2009, the RAE community continues to face discrimination.
Ali Komisija, ki spremlja dvostranske sporazume o ponovnem sprejetju med državami članicami in Kosovom, meni, da so prisilne vrnitve primerne glede na to, da je pomanjkljiva pomoč pri stanovanjskih vprašanjih, šolanju, zdravstva in zaposlovanju za vrnjene ljudi še naprej resen humanitarni problem?
Does the Commission, monitoring Member States' bilateral readmission agreements with Kosovo, deem the forced returns appropriate while the lack of assistance faced by returned people in the areas of housing, schooling, healthcare and employment remains a serious humanitarian problem?
Kaj namerava narediti Komisija v zvezi s tisoči pripadniki teh skupin, ki jim grozi, da bodo ostali brez domov?
What does the Commission plan to do about the thousands of members of these groups facing homelessness?
Kaj namerava Komisija narediti v primerih, ko se prisilno vrnjeni ljudje začnejo nezakonito preseljevati nazaj v Evropsko unijo in s tem ogrožati svoja življenja?
What does the Commission plan to do in cases when forcibly returned people start migrating back to the EU illegally, thus endangering their own lives?
Kako se bodo uporabila predpristopna sredstva EU za potrebe pripadnikov romske, aškalske in egipčanske skupnostni, ki so jih prisilno vrnili?
How do EU Pre-Accession Funds address the needs of RAE community members who were forcibly returned?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0032/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0032/10
Zadeva: Šport, natančneje zastopniki igralcev
Subject: Sport, specifically concerning players' agents
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji o prihodnosti poklicnega nogometa v Evropi ( P6_TA(2007)0100 ) pozval Komisijo, naj podpre prizadevanja nogometnih vodstvenih organov za ureditev pravil o zastopnikih igralcev, po potrebi s predstavitvijo predloga direktive.
In its resolution on the future of professional football in Europe ( P6_TA(2007)0100 ), the European Parliament called on the Commission to support football governing bodies’ efforts to regulate players’ agents, if necessary by presenting a proposal for a directive.
Zdaj so na voljo rezultati študije, za katero je Komisija ustrezno poskrbela.
The results of the study that the Commission duly launched are now available.
Zaključki študije med drugim kažejo, da pravila številnih športnih federacij, namenjena nadzoru dostopa do poklica in oblikovanju okvira za njegovo opravljanje, dejansko niso ovira za notranji trg storitev, vendar pa nimajo določb, ki bi ustrezno urejale nadzor in disciplinska pooblastila.
It concludes, inter alia, that the various sports federations’ regulations designed to control access to the profession and create a framework for the exercise thereof do not really constitute a barrier to the internal market for services but that they lack sufficient provision for monitoring and disciplinary powers.
Iz reakcij nogometnih vodstvenih organov je jasno, da želijo pomoč evropskih institucij pri reševanju različnih problemov, povezanih s položajem zastopnikov igralcev.
It seems clear from the reactions of the football governing bodies that they are seeking the European institutions’ help to tackle the various problems surrounding the situation of players’ agents.
Kako se namerava Komisija lotiti teh izzivov?
How does the Commission want to address these challenges?
Katere instrumente ima na razpolago za reševanje problemov, povezanih z zastopniki igralcev?
What instruments does it have at its disposal for resolving the problems with regard to players’ agents?
Glede na dejstvo, da zastopniki igralcev sodelujejo v čezmejnih dejavnostih, kakšno vlogo vidi Komisija zase, med drugim zlasti v zvezi z varstvom mladoletnikov?
Given that players’ agents engage in cross-border activities, what role does the Commission see for itself, particularly in relation to the protection of minors, amongst other issues?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0033/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0033/10
Zadeva: Pobuda Kouchner-Moratinos za priznanje palestinske države
Subject: Kouchner and Moratinos' initiative to recognise the Palestinian State
Francoski in španski minister za zunanje zadeve Bernard Kouchner in Miguel Angel Moratinos sta 22. februarja 2010 Evropsko unijo pozvala, naj se ne zadovolji več zgolj z opozarjanjem, češ da je treba za Bližnji vzhod zarisati dokončno ureditev, temveč naj v regiji odpre resnično politično perspektivo, s tem namenom pa palestinsko državo kolektivno prizna še pred sklenitvijo mirovnega sporazuma.
On 22 February 2010, the Foreign Ministers Bernard Kouchner and Miguel Angel Moratinos called on the European Union to no longer simply insist on the necessary broad outlines of a final settlement in the Middle East, but to create real political prospects in the region by collectively recognising the Palestinian State before a peace agreement is concluded.
Priznati moramo, da je kljub neuspešnemu procesu iz Annapolisa in konfliktu v Gazi polaganje temeljev palestinske države napredovalo, zahvaljujoč tako reformam predsednika palestinske vlade Salama Fajada, kot tudi podpori mednarodne skupnosti v obliki konference donatorjev za palestinsko državo.
Today, the fact is that despite the failure of the Annapolis process and despite the Gaza conflict, the construction of the foundations of the Palestinian State has progressed thanks both to the reforms carried out by the Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and to the international community’s support through the International Donors’ Conference for the Palestinian State.
A če se proračunski, varnostni in institucionalni temelji palestinske države že postavljajo, pa država potrebuje še politično in mednarodno razsežnost.
However, whilst the budgetary, security and institutional foundations of the Palestinian State are being put into place, the Palestinian State has yet to be given a political and international dimension.
Ministra Kouchner in Moratinos se zato v skladu z obvezo Evropske unije iz preteklosti, nazadnje izraženo na Svetu za zunanje zadeve 8. decembra 2009, potegujeta za priznanje palestinske države, da bi s tem nepreklicno podprli mirovni proces na Bližnjem vzhodu, ki ga bo treba natančno časovno opredeliti in ga opremiti z resnim pogajalskim mehanizmom, v katerem bodo ustrezno upoštevane napake iz preteklosti.
The ministers Kouchner and Moratinos therefore advocate recognition of the Palestinian State in accordance with the commitments given by the European Union in the past, most recently at the Foreign Affairs Council of 8 December 2009, in order to provide irreversible support to the peace process in the Middle East, with a narrow timeframe for negotiations and a genuine accompanying mechanism learning lessons from past errors.
Kakšno je stališče visoke predstavnice/podpredsednice Komisije do pobude za priznanje palestinske države kot solidne osnove za obnovitev izraelsko-palestinskih pogajanj za mirovni sporazum?
What is the position of the High Representative/Commission Vice-President on this initiative proposing to recognise the Palestinian State in order to create a solid basis for restarting Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement negotiations?
Kako namerava iz Evropske unije narediti obveznega in vplivnega partnerja na Bližnjem vzhodu, ki bo odprl pot trdnemu, pravičnemu in trajnemu mirovnemu procesu?
How does she intend to make the European Union an incontrovertible and predominant actor in the Middle East which aims to prepare the ground for a stable, just and lasting peace process?
Glede na to, da Svet za zunanje zadeve 8. decembra 2009 ni formalno podprl sklepov o vzhodnem Jeruzalemu, ki so jih predlagali vodje misij EU na Bližnjem vzhodu, kaj namerava visoka predstavnica storiti, da bodo ti sklepi postali operativni in bodo v prihodnjih mesecih prinesli rezultate?
In view of the fact that the conclusions of the region’s EU heads of mission on East Jerusalem were not formally endorsed by the Foreign Affairs Council of 8 December 2009, how does the High Representative intend to make them operational and effective in the coming months?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0034/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0034/10
Več držav članic Evropske unije je s Kosovom podpisalo sporazum o ponovnem sprejetju (Belgija, Francija) ali pa ga izvaja (Nemčija) oziroma se o njem pogaja (Avstrija).
Several EU Member States have signed (Belgium, France) or are implementing (Germany) or negotiating (Austria) readmission agreements with Kosovo.
Komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice Thomas Hammarberg je pozval evropske vlade, naj se izogibajo prisilnim vrnitvam manjšin na Kosovo.
The Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights, Thomas Hammarberg called on European governments to avoid forced returns of minorities to Kosovo.
Po njegovem poročilu se pripadniki romske, aškalske in egipčanske skupnosti po vrnitvi na Kosovo soočajo z marginalizacijo in diskriminacijo pri izobraževanju, socialnem varstvu, zdravstvu in stanovanjskih vprašanjih.
According to his report, members of Roma, Ashkali and Egyptian communities (RAE) face marginalisation and discrimination in the areas of education, social protection, health care and housing once returned to Kosovo.
Varnost teh manjšin je še naprej zaskrbljujoča, o etnično motiviranih incidentih pa se še vedno ne poroča.
Security for these minorities remains a concern and ethnically-motivated incidents continue to go unreported.
Skladno s poročilom Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi iz novembra 2009 kosovske institucije ne izpolnjujejo svojih obvez iz Strategije ponovne vključitve vrnjenih oseb.
According to an OSCE report of November 2009 Kosovo institutions fall short of fulfilling their obligations under the Strategy for the Reintegration of Repatriated Persons.
Kot navaja poročilo o širitvi Evropske unije o napredku Kosova iz leta 2009, so romska, aškalska in egipčanska skupnost še vedno diskriminirane.
As stated in the EU enlargement strategy Kosovo Progress Report 2009, the RAE community continues to face discrimination.
Ali Komisija, ki spremlja dvostranske sporazume o ponovnem sprejetju med državami članicami in Kosovom, meni, da so prisilne vrnitve primerne glede na to, da je pomanjkljiva pomoč pri stanovanjskih vprašanjih, šolanju, zdravstvu in zaposlovanju za vrnjene ljudi še naprej resen humanitarni problem?
Does the Commission, monitoring Member States’ bilateral readmission agreements with Kosovo, deem the forced returns appropriate while the lack of assistance faced by returned people in the areas of housing, schooling, health care and employment is a serious humanitarian problem?
Kaj namerava narediti Komisija v zvezi s tisoči pripadnikov teh skupin, ki jim grozi, da bodo ostali brez domov?
What does the Commission plan to do to prevent thousands of members of these groups facing homelessness?
Kaj namerava Komisija narediti v primerih, ko se prisilno vrnjeni ljudje začnejo nezakonito preseljevati nazaj v Evropsko unijo in s tem ogrožati svoja življenja?
What does the Commission plan to do in cases where forcibly returned people start migrating back to the EU illegally, thereby endangering their own lives?
Kako se bodo uporabila predpristopna sredstva EU za potrebe pripadnikov romske, aškalske in egipčanske skupnosti, ki so jih prisilno vrnili?
How do EU pre-accession funds address the needs of RAE community members who were forcibly returned?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0035/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0035/10
Zadeva: Prepoved tehnologij rudarjenja s cianidom v Evropski uniji
Subject: Ban on the use of cyanide mining technologies in the EU
Cianid je zelo strupena kemikalija, ki jo uporabljajo v sektorju pridobivanja zlata in ki lahko ima katastrofične in nepopravljive posledice na okolje in na zdravje človeka.
Cyanide is a highly toxic chemical used in the gold mining industry that can have a catastrophic and irreversible impact on the environment and human health.
Ta snov pa tudi izpolnjuje pogoje pomembnega onesnaževalca v okvirni direktivi o vodi.
It also qualifies as a main pollutant under the Water Framework Directive (WFD).
Pred desetimi leti je se je iz vodnega zbiralnika rudnika zlata v kraju Baia Mare (Romunija) v rečnem sistemu, ki ga tvorijo Donava, Szamos in Tisa, izlilo več kot 100.000 kubičnih metrov s cianidom onesnažene vode in povzročilo največjo ekološko nesrečo v Evropi v tistem času.
10 years ago more than 100 000 cubic meters of cyanide-tainted water were released from a gold mine reservoir in Baia Mare (Romania) into the Szamos - Tisza - Danube River system and caused the largest ecological disaster in Central Europe at that time.