natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Nedavni razvoj dogodkov na področju mednarodnih menjalnih tečajev
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Latest developments in international currency exchange rates
Vodja Mednarodnega denarnega sklada je prejšnji teden izjavil, da vladam grozi vojna valut, če bodo skušale uporabiti menjalne tečaje, da bi rešile domače težave.
The Head of the IMF said last week that, ‘Governments are risking a currency war if they try to use exchange rates to solve domestic problems’.
V zadnjih tednih so številna pomembnejša gospodarstva sprejela ukrepe, da bi zmanjšala vse večji pritisk na njihove valute.
In recent weeks, several major economies have taken action to relieve upward pressure on their currencies.
Japonska je prvič po šestih letih posredovala na valutnih trgih s prodajo jena.
Japan intervened in the currency markets to sell yen for the first time in six years.
Prejšnji ponedeljek je Brazilija podvojila davek na nakup obveznic s strani tujcev, da bi zmanjšala prilive.
Last Monday, Brazil doubled a tax on the foreign purchase of bonds in an attempt to reduce inflows.
Predsedujoči skupini finančnih ministrov euroobmočja je nedavno izjavil, da je Kitajska valuta na očitno podcenjena.
The Chair of the group of Euro-area finance ministers has said recently that the ‘Chinese currency is broadly undervalued’.
Menjalni tečaj USD/EUR je na najnižji ravni v osemnajstih mesecih.
The dollar/euro exchange rate is at its lowest level for 18 months.
Večina gospodarstev EU izvaja pomembne programe davčnih prilagoditev; ukrepi na področju menjalnih tečajev, ki so jih sprejeli naši najpomembnejši tekmeci, ogrožajo šibko okrevanje EU in svetovnega gospodarstva.
Most EU economies are undertaking major fiscal adjustments programmes; the exchange rate measures taken by our major competitors are undermining the fragile EU and global recovery.
Kaj namerava storiti Komisija?
What does the Commission intend to do?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0146/2010
Question for oral answer O-0146/2010
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Baze podatkov o Romih ter diskriminacija v Franciji in EU
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Roma databases and discrimination in France and in the EU
Komisija je 29. septembra 2010 izjavila, da bo Franciji poslala uradni opomin z zahtevkom, da v svojo zakonodajo v celoti prenese direktivo o prostem gibanju, razen če do 15. oktobra 2010 zagotovi osnutke ukrepov za prenos in podroben časovni okvir za prenos, ter pismo s podrobnimi vprašanji o praktični uporabi političnih zagotovil francoskih oblasti, s katerimi bodo v celoti zagotovile učinkovito in nediskriminatorno uporabo zakonodaje EU v skladu s Pogodbami in Listino EU o temeljnih pravicah , vključno v zvezi z obdobjem uporabe okrožnice s 5. avgusta 2010, izrecno usmerjene izgonu Romov.
On 29 September 2010 the Commission stated it would issue ‘ a letter of formal notice to France requesting the full transposition of the (free movement) directive, unless draft transposition measures and a detailed transposition schedule are provided by 15 October 2010’ and another letter ‘ with detailed questions regarding the practical application of the political assurances provided’ by the French authorities on the fact that they ‘ fully ensure an effective and non-discriminatory application of EU law in line with the Treaties and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ , including in the period of application of the 5 August circular explicitly targeting Roma for expulsion.
Že leta 2008 so nevladne organizacije Komisiji posredovale dokaze o etnični in rasni pogojenosti izgonov iz Francije, Parlament pa je pozval Komisijo, naj ukrepa zoper francoske oblasti, med drugim zaradi diskriminacije.
As early as 2008 NGOs provided the Commission with evidence on the ethnic and racial nature of expulsions from France and the EP called on the Commission to act against the French authorities also on the basis of discrimination.
Poleg tega po nedavnem poročanju medijev francoska žandarmerija uporablja bazo podatkov o Romih, imenovano MENS .
In addition, according to recent media information, the French gendarmerie runs a database called ‘MENS’ , targeting Roma.
Nevladne organizacije so vložile pritožbo zaradi vzpostavitve nezakonite in neprijavljene baze podatkov za shranjevanje osebnih podatkov o rasnem in etničnem izvoru ter napovedale nadaljnje pritožbe na CNIL in HALDE , francoske oblasti pa obstoj takšne baze podatkov zanikajo.
NGOs have tabled a complaint against the creation of an illegal and undeclared database for the storage of ‘personal data related to racial and ethnic origin’ and announced further appeals to the CNIL and the HALDE , while French authorities deny the existence of such a database.
Minister za priseljevanje je tudi pred tem naznanil, da bodo biometrični podatki o izgnanih Romih shranjeni v bazi podatkov OSCAR in tudi v bazi podatkov EDVIGE/EDVIRSP , ki se ravno vzpostavlja, poroča pa se tudi, da Nizozemska in druge države EU shranjujejo podatke o rasnem in etničnem izvoru, v Italiji pa se Romom odklanja dostop do socialnih stanovanj.
The Immigration Minister also previously announced that the insertion of biometric data of expelled Roma in the OSCAR database, EDVIGE/EDVIRSP , is in the process of being created, while the Netherlands and other EU countries are also reported to be registering ethnic and racial data and Italy is denying Roma access to public housing.
Ob tem Svet razpravlja o osnutku sklepov o „potujočih kriminalnih skupinah“, pri katerem se uporabljajo dvoumni pogoji in pri katerem EP ne sodeluje, niti ni bil obveščen.
Against this background, the Council is discussing draft conclusions to target ‘mobile (itinerant) criminal groups’ in which ambiguous terms are used and without the EP being involved or even informed.
Ali je Komisija od francoskih oblasti prejela zahtevane informacije, tudi informacije o obstoju takšnih baz podatkov, njihovi naravi, namenu, uporabi in posledicah na podlagi načela lojalnega sodelovanja?
Has the Commission received the information requested from the French authorities, including on the existence of such databases, their nature, purpose, use and consequences, in accordance with the principle of loyal cooperation?
Katere ukrepe bo sprejela v povezavi z dodatnimi dokazi o diskriminaciji Romov in kršenju nacionalnih in evropskih pravil o zaščiti podatkov in v povezavi z informacijami nevladnih organizacij o diskriminatorni obravnavi in izgonu Romov iz Francije in drugih držav članic?
What measures will it take in relation to further evidence of Roma discrimination and violation of national and European data protection rules and on the information received from NGOs on the discriminatory treatment and expulsion of Roma in France and other Member States?
Katere dodatne dokaze potrebuje Komisija, da bo ukrepala tudi glede kršenja prepovedi diskriminacije na podlagi rase ali etnije?
What further evidence does the Commission need before taking action also on the violation of the prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of race and ethnicity?
Ali lahko zagotovi informacije o ukrepih, povezanih z Romi, ki so jih sprejele EU in evropske institucije?
Can it provide information on measures concerning Roma by EU and European institutions?
‘Exploitation documentaire et valorisation de l'information générale/ Exploitation documentaire et valorisation de l'information relative à la sécurité publique’.
Exploitation documentaire et valorisation de l'information générale / Exploitation documentaire et valorisation de l'information relative à la sécurité publique databases.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0147/2010
Question for oral answer O-0147/2010
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Uveljavitev spoštovanja držav članic pakta stabilnosti in rasti v euroobmočju z okrepitvijo sankcij v skladu s členom 136
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Enforcing Member States' compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact in the Eurozone by strengthening sanctions under Article 136
Ali predlog za uveljavitev spoštovanja držav članic pakta stabilnosti in rasti v euroobmočju z okrepitvijo sankcij v skladu s členom 136, natančneje z uvedbo bolj samodejnih pravil sprejemanja odločitev o sankcijah na podlagi „pravila obratne večine“, zahteva spremembo veljavnih pogodb, zlasti člena 238 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije?
Does the proposal to enforce Member States’ compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact in the Eurozone by strengthening sanctions under Article 136, namely by introducing more automatic decision-making rules on sanctions based on a ‘reverse majority rule’, require changes to the Treaties, in particular to Article 238 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?
Če ni tako, kakšna je pravna podlaga v veljavnih pogodbah za tako imenovano „pravilo obratne večine“?
If not, what is the legal basis in the Treaties for a so-called ‘reverse majority rule’?
Katere druge pristojnosti/področja politike so ali bodo zajete v tem pravilu?
What other competences/areas of policy are or will be covered by this rule?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0148/2010
Question for oral answer O-0148/2010
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Posredovanje podatkov držav članic ZDA na podlagi memorandumov o soglasju
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Data transfer to the US by Member States on the basis of Memoranda of Understanding
V odgovor na izvedbena priporočila komisije za teroristične napade na ZDA iz leta 2007 (http://intelligence.senate.gov/laws/pl11053.pdf), je bilo sklenjeno, da se začnejo pogajanja z ZDA na podlagi dvotirnega pristopa: pogajanja EU – ZDA in pogajanja o dvostranskih memorandumih o soglasju med ZDA in posameznimi državami članicami.
In response to the US ‘Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007’ (http://intelligence.senate.gov/laws/pl11053.pdf), it was decided to start negotiations with the US on the basis of a twin track approach: EU-US negotiations and negotiations on bilateral Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) between the US and individual Member States.
Za odprt in pregleden postopek dvostranskih pogajanj se niso odločile vse države članice, niti niso vse predložile nastalih memorandumov o soglasju v odobritev zadevnim nacionalnim parlamentom.
Not all Member States have chosen an open and transparent procedure for the bilateral negotiations, nor have they all submitted the resulting MoU to their respective national parliaments for approval.
Obstajajo navedbe, da bi memorandumi o soglasju utegnili sovpadati z dogovori, sklenjenimi med EU in ZDA, na primer z dogovorom o podatkih iz evidence podatkov o potnikih.
There are indications that the MoUs may overlap with agreements concluded between the EU and the US, such as the agreement on passenger name record (PNR) data.
Ob upoštevanju sedanjega dela na paketu evidence podatkov o potnikih in morebitnih novih pogajanj, je treba te zadeve nujno pojasniti.
In view of the current work on the PNR package and possible new negotiations, these matters need to be clarified urgently.
Ali lahko Svet zagotovi pojasnila o naslednjih točkah:
Can the Council provide clarification on the following points:
- Katere države članice so do sedaj sklenile dvostranske memorandume o soglasju?
- Which Member States have so far concluded a bilateral MoU?
- Kateri od teh memorandumov o soglasju vključujejo podatke iz evidence podatkov o potnikih?
- Which of these MoUs include the transfer of PNR data?
- Kako so ti dvostranski dogovori o evidenci podatkov o potnikih povezani s sporazumom med EU in ZDA?
- How do these bilateral agreements on PNR relate to the EU-US agreement?
- Ali lahko Svet potrdi, da to zadeva posredovanje podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih na evropskih letih in tistih, ki potujejo na druge cilje zunaj ZDA?
- Can the Council confirm that this concerns the transfer of PNR data on European flights and passengers to destinations other than the US?
- Ali lahko Svet navede, katere kategorije podatkov zajemajo ti memorandumi o soglasju?
- Can the Council indicate which categories of data are covered by these MoUs?
- Ali je Svet upošteval, da bi se lahko od držav članic zahtevalo, da posredujejo nacionalne podatke, ki so tudi del evropskih baz podatkov (na primer Prüm)?
- Has the Council considered that Member States may be asked to transfer national data that are also part of European databases (such as Prüm)?
- Ali Svet meni, da je tako posredovanje podatkov skladno z Evropskimi pravili o varstvu podatkov?
- Does the Council consider such data transfers to be in line with European data protection rules?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0149/2010
Question for oral answer O-0149/2010
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Posredovanje podatkov držav članic ZDA na podlagi memorandumov o soglasju
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Data transfer to the US by Member States on the basis of Memoranda of Understanding
Za odprt in pregleden postopek dvostranskih pogajanj se niso odločile vse države članice, niti niso vse predložile nastalih memorandumov o soglasju v odobritev svojim nacionalnim parlamentom.
Not all Member States have chosen an open and transparent procedure for the bilateral negotiations, nor have they all submitted the resulting MoU to their respective national parliaments for approval.
Glede na sedanje delo na paketu evidence podatkov o potnikih in morebitna nova pogajanja je treba te zadeve nujno pojasniti.
In view of the current work on the PNR package and possible new negotiations, these matters need to be clarified urgently.
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni naslednje točke:
Can the Commission provide clarification on the following points:
- Ali lahko Komisija potrdi, da to zadeva posredovanje podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih na evropskih letih in potnike, ki potujejo na cilje zunaj ZDA?
- Can the Commission confirm that this concerns the transfer of PNR data on European flights and passengers to destinations other than the US?
- Ali lahko Komisija navede, katere kategorije podatkov zajemajo ti memorandumi o soglasju?
- Can the Commission indicate which categories of data are covered by these MoUs?
- Ali je Komisija upoštevala, da bi se lahko od držav članic zahtevalo, da posredujejo nacionalne podatke, ki so tudi del evropskih zbirk podatkov (na primer Prüm)?
- Has the Commission considered that Member States may be asked to transfer national data that are also part of European databases (such as Prüm)?
- Ali Komisija meni, da je tako posredovanje podatkov skladno z Evropskimi pravili o varstvu podatkov?
- Does the Commission consider such data transfers to be in line with European data protection rules?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0150/2010
Question for oral answer O-0150/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Katastrofa s strupeno rdečo goščo na Madžarskem
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Toxic red sludge disaster in Hungary
4. oktobra 2010 se je zgodila največja okoljska katastrofa na Madžarskem, ko se je iz rezervoarja tovarne aluminija razlil velikanski val (1 milijon kubičnih metrov) strupene rdeče gošče, ki je poplavila mesta in vasi, pri čemer je izgubilo življenje vsaj osem ljudi, več sto ljudi pa je bilo poškodovanih.
Hungary’s largest ecological disaster took place on 4 October 2010, when the reservoir of an aluminium plant ruptured and an enormous wave of 1 million m 3 of toxic red sludge flooded towns and villages, killing at least eight people while injuring several hundred in its way.
Strupena gošča je zastrupila tudi kmetijske površine in vode, čiščenje pa bo dolgotrajno in naporno.
The toxic waste has also polluted agricultural fields and waterways, and will take a great deal of time and effort to clear away.
Poleg tega je več sto družin izgubilo svoje domove in sredstva za življenje.
Several hundred families also lost their homes and existence.
Natančna škoda še ni znana, vendar lahko po predhodnih izračunih krepko preseže 100 milijonov EUR.
Though exact data on the damages is not yet available, according to preliminary calculations damages may significantly exceed EUR 100 million.
Ker madžarski primer in druge evropske industrijske nesreče v zadnjih desetih letih kažejo, da se lahko takšne katastrofe zgodijo kadarkoli in kjerkoli, solidarnostni sklad EU pa zadevni državi članici ne daje nobene priložnosti, da bi EU pozvala k finančni pomoči v primeru takšne katastrofe, ali lahko Komisija odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Since the Hungarian case and other European industrial accidents in the last decade show that such disasters can happen at any time and anywhere, but the EU Solidarity Fund gives the Member State concerned no opportunity to call for EU financial support in the event of this kind of catastrophe, could the Commission answer the following questions:
- Ali obstaja način, kako omogočiti finančno pomoč v primeru takšne katastrofe z obstoječimi finančnimi instrumenti EU?
- Is there any way in which financial support could be provided in the event of such catastrophes under the existing EU financial instruments?
- Ali Komisija meni, da je mogoče uporabiti kakšen primernejši finančni mehanizem za boljše omejevanje škode po nesreči, npr. v obliki zavarovalnih obveznosti ali jamstev?
- Does the Commission consider it possible that a more adequate financial mechanism could be applied to enhance post-disaster damage limitation, e.g. in the form of insurance obligations or guarantees?
- Kakšni so načrti Komisije za izboljšanje in okrepitev obstoječe zakonodaje EU, zlasti zadevajoč varnostna pravila in nadzorne določbe, ki veljajo za potencialno nevarne industrijske dejavnosti, tako da se v EU takšna katastrofa ne bo več zgodila?
- What is the Commission planning to do to improve and strengthen already existing EU legislation, especially with regard to the safety rules and controlling provisions applicable to potentially dangerous industrial activities, so that such a catastrophe may not happen again in the EU?
- Ali bo Komisija po vsej EU opravila pregled izvajanja zakonodaje EU, zlasti glede okoljskih ureditev v državah članicah?
- Will the Commission carry out an EU wide inspection of implementation of the EU legislation, especially with regard to environmental regulations in the Member States?
- Ali bo Komisija opravila presojo vplivov, kar zadeva opredelitev rdeče gošče kot nevarne snovi v ustreznih uredbah EU?
- Will the Commission carry out an impact assessment in regard to the qualification of the 'red sludge' as a hazardous substance under the relevant EU regulations?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0151/2010
Question for oral answer O-0151/2010
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Tunizija - o členu 61a kazenskega zakonika
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Tunisia - Article 61a of the Penal Code
Tunizijska poslanska zbornica je 15. junija 2010 sprejela novo spremembo člena 61a kazenskega zakonika, ki obravnava kršenje tunizijske zunanje varnosti.
On 15 June 2010 the Tunisian Chamber of Deputies adopted a new amendment to Article 61a of the Penal Code, which deals with violations of the ‘external security’ of Tunisia.
Tunizijci so lahko za to kaznivo dejanje obsojeni na do 20 let zapora, z minimalno kaznijo petih let.
Tunisians convicted of this crime face up to 20 years prison, with a minimum sentence of 5 years.
Nova zakonodaja določa, da bo kaznovan vsak Tunizijec, ki vzpostavi stike z agenti, institucijo ali organizacijo tuje države, da bi ogrozil „življenjske interese Tunizije“ in njeno „gospodarsko varnost“.
The new legislation stipulates that any Tunisian who establishes contacts with agents of a foreign country, a foreign institution or organisation to harm ‘Tunisia’s vital interests’ and its ‘economic security’ will be punished.
Poleg tega je tunizijska vlada zamrznila sredstva EU za neodvisne organizacije civilne družbe, natančneje od leta 2006 za Tunizijsko ligo za obrambo človekovih pravic (Tunisian League for the Defence of Human Rights) in od februarja 2010 za Tunizijsko demokratično žensko zvezo (Tunisian Democratic Women’s Association).
Moreover, European funding for independent civil society organisations, namely the Tunisian League for the Defence of Human Rights (LTDH) and the Tunisian Democratic Women’s Association (ATFD) have been frozen by the Tunisian Government since 2006 for the LTDH and since February 2010 for the ATFD.
Ali Svet meni, da nove zakonodajne določbe nasprotujejo členu 2 pridružitvenega sporazuma med Tunizijo in EU iz leta 1995, ki določa, da je vodilo za domačo in mednarodno politiko obeh strani spoštovanje demokratičnih načel in temeljnih pravic, ter da je sprejetje teh določb ovira za krepitev odnosov med EU in Tunizijo?
Does the Council consider that this new legal provision contradicts Article 2 of the 1995 Association Agreement between Tunisia and the EU which stipulates that respect for democratic principles and fundamental rights guide the two parties’ domestic and international policies and that its adoption is an obstacle to the enhancement of EU-Tunisia relations?
Katere konkretne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Svet, da bi zagotovil učinkovito uporabo evropskih sredstev?
What concrete measures does the Council take to ensure effective use of European funds?
Kakšna je strategija Sveta za Tunizijo na področju človekovih pravic glede na končno izjavo pridružitvenega sveta EU–Tunizija z dne 11. maja 2010?
What is the human rights strategy of the Council towards Tunisia in line with the final declaration of the EU-Tunisia Association Council of 11 May 2010?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0152/2010
Question for oral answer O-0152/2010
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Tunizija - o členu 61a kazenskega zakonika
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Tunisia - on Article 61a of the Penal Code
Tunizijska poslanska zbornica je 15. junija 2010 sprejela novo spremembo člena 61a kazenskega zakonika, ki obravnava kršenje tunizijske zunanje varnosti.
The Tunisian Chamber of Deputies adopted on 15 June 2010 a new amendment to Article 61a of the Penal Code, which deals with violations of the ‘external security’ of Tunisia.
Tunizijci so lahko za to kaznivo dejanje obsojeni na do 20 let zapora, z minimalno kaznijo petih let.
Tunisians convicted of this crime face up to 20 years in prison, with a minimum sentence of five years.
Nova zakonodaja določa, da bo kaznovan vsak Tunizijec, ki vzpostavi stike z agenti, institucijo ali organizacijo tuje države, da bi ogrozil „življenjske interese Tunizije“ in njeno „gospodarsko varnost“.
The new legislation stipulates that any Tunisian who establishes contacts with agents of a foreign country, a foreign institution or organisation to harm ‘Tunisia's vital interests’ and its ‘economic security’ will be sanctioned.
Poleg tega je tunizijska vlada zamrznila sredstva EU za neodvisne organizacije civilne družbe, natančneje od leta 2006 za Tunizijsko ligo za obrambo človekovih pravic (Tunisian League for the Defence of Human Rights) in od februarja 2010 za Tunizijsko demokratično žensko zvezo (Tunisian Democratic Women’s Association).
Furthermore, the Tunisian Government has frozen European funding for independent civil society organisations, namely the Tunisian League for the Defence of Human Rights (LTDH) (frozen since 2006) and the Tunisian Democratic Women’s Association (ATFD) (frozen since February 2010).
Ali Komisija meni, da nove zakonodajne določbe nasprotujejo členu 2 pridružitvenega sporazuma med Tunizijo in EU, ki določa, da je vodilo za domačo in mednarodno politiko obeh strani spoštovanje demokratičnih načel in temeljnih pravic, ter da je sprejetje teh določb ovira za okrepitev odnosov med EU in Tunizijo?
Does the Commission consider that this new legal provision contradicts Article 2 of the 1995 Association Agreement between Tunisia and the EU, which stipulates that respect for democratic principles and fundamental rights must guide the two parties' domestic and international policies, and that its adoption is an obstacle to the enhancement of EU-Tunisia relations?
Katere konkretne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi zagotovila učinkovito uporabo evropskih sredstev?
What concrete measures will the Commission take to ensure effective use of European funds?
Kakšna je strategija Komisije za Tunizijo na področju človekovih pravic glede na končno izjavo pridružitvenega sveta EU–Tunizija z dne 11. maja 2010?
What is the human rights strategy of the Commission in regard to Tunisia, in line with the final declaration of the EU-Tunisia Association Council of 11 May 2010?