natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kakšna je strategija Sveta za večji napredek pri doseganju polnega izvajanja akcijskega načrta o biotski raznovrstnosti, da bi izpolnili cilj za leto 2010 ter zaščitili in obnovili dragoceno naravno dediščino Evrope tudi po tem letu?
- What is the Council’s strategy to accelerate progress towards achieving full implementation of the Biodiversity Action Plan, to meet the 2010 target, and to protect and restore Europe’s valuable natural heritage beyond 2010?
In še posebej, kako bo Svet cilje o ohranitvi biotske raznovrstnosti vključil v druge politike EU?
In particular, what will the Council do to integrate biodiversity conservation objectives into other EU policies?
Kako bo Svet nadalje ukrepal na podlagi velikega napredka, ki ga je Evropska unija dosegla pri vzpostavitvi omrežja varstvenih območij Natura 2000 v okviru direktiv o pticah in habitatih – kako bo zagotovil primerno zaščito, upravljanje in nadzor teh območij ter izboljšanje njihovega stanja ohranjenosti?
- What will the Council do to build on the significant progress made by the EU in establishing the Natura 2000 network of protected sites under the Birds and Habitats Directives, and how will it ensure that these sites are properly protected, managed and monitored and their conservation status is improved?
Ali bo Svet uporabil vsa sredstva, ki jih ima na voljo, vključno s pregledom proračuna EU, da bi pridobil več finančnih sredstev za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti in Naturo 2000?
- Will the Council use all the means at its disposal, including the EU Budget Review, to generate more funding for biodiversity conservation and Natura 2000?
O katerih konkretnih možnostih razmišlja Svet za neposredno financiranje biotske raznovrstnosti in reformo skupne kmetijske politike?
- In particular, what options does the Council have in mind for direct biodiversity funding and reform of the CAP?
Ali bo Svet za okolje razpravljal o predlogih Komisije za naslednji pregled proračuna EU?
- Will the Environment Council discuss the Commission’s proposals for the forthcoming EU Budget Review?
Katere ukrepe bo Svet sprejel, da bi priznal in uporabil vzajemne koristi med zaščito ekosistemov/biotske raznovrstnosti ter blaženjem podnebnih sprememb/prilagajanjem podnebnim spremembam?
- What steps will the Council take to recognise and use the co-benefits between ecosystem/biodiversity protection and climate change mitigation/adaptation?
Katere ukrepe bo Svet sprejel, da bi obravnaval okoljske in ekonomske nevarnosti, ki jih prinašajo invazivne tuje vrste?
- What measures will the Council take to address the environmental and economic threat from invasive alien species?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0056/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0056/09
– Kakšna je strategija Komisije za večji napredek pri doseganju polnega izvajanja akcijskega načrta, da bi izpolnili cilj za leto 2010 in zaščitili ter obnovili dragoceno naravno dediščino Evrope tudi po tem letu?
- What is the Commission’s strategy to accelerate progress towards achieving full implementation of the Action Plan, to meet the 2010 target, and to protect and restore Europe’s valuable natural heritage beyond 2010?
– Kako Komisija pripravlja politiko o biotski raznovrstnosti za obdobje po letu 2010 in kako bo zagotovila, da bo ta politika temeljila na napredku, doseženem z direktivama EU o naravi in z Naturo 2000?
- How is the Commission preparing its post-2010 biodiversity policy, and how will it ensure this policy will build on and strengthen the progress made through the EU Nature Directives and Natura 2000?
– Ali bo Komisija v svojem naslednjem predlogu za pregled proračuna EU predlagala možnosti za povečanje neposrednega in sektorskega financiranja za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti?
- In its forthcoming proposal for an EU Budget Review, will the Commission propose options to increase direct and sectoral funding for biodiversity conservation?
Če da, katere?
- If so, what are they?
– Ali bo Komisija v pregledu proračuna EU predlagala reformiranje skupne kmetijske politike v politiko trajnostnega razvoja podeželja in rabe zemljišč?
- In the EU Budget Review, will the Commission propose to reform the CAP into a sustainable rural development and land-use policy?
– Kako bo Komisija v naslednji beli knjigi o prilagajanju podnebnim spremembam spodbujala biotsko raznovrstnost in zdrave ekosisteme kot osnovno načelo za vse strategije o prilagajanju podnebnim spremembam?
- In its forthcoming White Paper on climate change adaptation, how will the Commission promote biodiversity and healthy ecosystems as underlying principles for any climate change adaptation strategy?
– Katere možnosti ukrepanja bo Komisija uporabila na podlagi svoje zelene knjige o invazivnih tujih vrstah?
- Following its Green Paper on Invasive Alien Species, which option for action will the Commission now pursue?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0057/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0057/09
Zadeva: Enotni polnilci mobilnih telefonov
Subject: Non-interoperability of mobile phone chargers
Ali lahko Komisija v zvezi z vprašanjem za pisni odgovor E-5767/08 o enotnih polnilcih za mobilne telefone navede, kaj je bilo doseženo v zvezi s poenotenjem, ter zlasti, ali je že sprejela ustrezne ukrepe za rešitev tega vprašanja, ki zadeva tako evropske potrošnike (ti so prisiljeni zamenjati delujoče polnilce) kot okolje (zaradi ogromne količine nastalih odpadkov)?
With reference to Written Question E-5767/08 on the non-interoperability of mobile phone chargers, would the Commission state what progress has been made towards harmonisation and, in particular, whether it has already taken measures to tackle this problem, which directly affects European consumers (who are obliged to replace chargers which still work) and the environment (because of the enormous quantity of waste thus generated)?
Ali je Komisija že vzpostavila dialog s proizvajalci o tem, da bi lahko uporabniki uporabljali kateri koli polnilec, kar je čedalje bolj nujno, in kakšni so rezultati?
Has the Commission already held discussions with the manufacturers with a view to enabling any consumer to use any mobile phone charger, which is increasingly necessary?
Ali Komisija meni, da je za to področju potrebna posebna zakonodaja?
Does the Commission think that specific legislation will be required to achieve this purpose?
Ali Komisija namerava te ukrepe razširiti tudi na druge elektronske naprave?
Does the Commission envisage extending any such measures to other types of electronic equipment?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0058/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0058/09
Zadeva: Ponarejena zdravila v internetu
Subject: Counterfeit medicines on the Internet
Ponarejena zdravila zelo ogrožajo javno zdravje in varnost.
Counterfeit medicines are a major threat to public health and safety.
Evropska unija se sooča s težavami, ker načini ponarejanja postajajo vse bolj izpopolnjeni.
The EU faces the problem of counterfeiting methods becoming more sophisticated.
Tveganje, da ponarejena zdravila pridejo na trg Evropske unije po nezakonitih distribucijskih poteh, iz leta v leto narašča.
The risk of counterfeit medicines entering the EU through illegal distribution channels is increasing every year.
Komisija je s tem problemom seznanjena in je pripravila spremembo Direktive 2001/83/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v humani medicini.
The European Commission is aware of this problem and drew up an amendment to Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use.
Predlog (COM(2008)0668) je bil predstavljen jeseni 2008 in posredovan Evropskemu parlamentu decembra 2008.
The actual proposal (COM(2008)0668) was announced in autumn 2008 and sent to the European Parliament in December 2008.
Njegov namen je omejiti tveganje, da ponarejena zdravila postanejo del zakonite dobavne verige tovrstnih izdelkov v Evropski uniji.
The aim of this proposal is to address in particular the risk of counterfeit medicines entering the legal supply chain for medicines in the EU.
Ali je Komisija naredila dovolj, da bi potrošnike zavarovala pred nevarnostmi interneta, glede na to, da večina ponarejenih zdravil vstopi v zakonito dobavno verigo EU prav po tej poti (v 80 % primerov, je pokazala nedavna raziskava za nemško zvezno policijo)?
As counterfeit medicines' main point of entry into the legal supply chain for medicines in the EU is the Internet – accounting for 80%, as a recent study by the German Federal Criminal Police Agency shows – is the European Commission doing enough to protect the consumer from that source of danger?
Ali se Komisija zaveda, da bi lahko s seznamom internetnih lekarn in potrdili za spletna mesta omejili nezakonito internetno trgovino, ta sredstva pa bi bila učinkovita tudi pri odpravljanju glavnih razlogov za ponarejena zdravila v EU?
Is the European Commission aware that listing Internet pharmacies and certifying Internet websites would hinder illegal Internet trade and be an efficient tool for combating the main cause of counterfeit medicines in the EU?
Če se tega zaveda, kakšen je njen akcijski načrt za uvedbo takšnih instrumentov?
If so, what is the action plan for implementing such an instrument?
UL L 311, 28.11.2001, str.
OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0059/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0059/09
Zadeva: Sporočilo Komisije "Odziv na krizo v evropski avtomobilski industriji" KOM(2009)0104
Subject: Communication from the Commission on 'Responding to the crisis in the European automotive industry' COM(2009)0104
Komisija je konec februarja 2009 objavila sporočilo o krizi v evropski avtomobilski industriji.
In late February 2009, the Commission issued a communication on the crisis in the European automotive industry.
Avtomobilska industrija je eden paradnih konjev EU in zaposluje približno 12 milijonov ljudi.
The automotive industry is one of the EU’s flagship industries, accounting for some 12 million jobs.
Finančna kriza je še posebej močno prizadela avtomobilsko industrijo.
The financial crisis has hit the automotive industry particularly hard.
Ker je avtomobilska proizvodnja tesno povezana z drugimi industrijami, je upad povpraševanja po novih osebnih avtomobilih temu ustrezno prizadel tudi mnoge druge industrijske panoge v več državah članicah.
Owing to the fact that automotive manufacturing is closely linked with other industries, many other industrial sectors and Member States have also been affected by the drop in demand for new passenger cars.
Evropska komisija bi morala pojasniti naslednja vprašanja:
Could the European Commission therefore clarify the following issues:
Dostop do kreditnega financiranja je ključnega pomena za avtomobilsko industrijo in njene dobavitelje.
Access to credit financing is crucial for the automotive industry and its suppliers.
Ali obstaja namera po razširitvi in/ali dopolnitvi trenutnega programa kreditov Evropske investicijske banke?
Is the intention to extend and/or amend the European Investment Bank’s current credit programme?
Novi „Začasni okvir Skupnosti za ukrepe državne pomoči“, sprejet decembra 2008 , olajšuje zagotavljanje finančne pomoči podjetjem.
The new ‘Temporary Framework for State Aid’ was adopted in December 2008 , facilitating the provision of financial aid to companies.
Kako bo lahko Komisija ohranila enake pogoje na notranjem trgu in se izognila konkurenčnemu subvencioniranju?
How can the Commission maintain a level playing field within the internal market and avoid competitive subsidisation?
Kako namerava Komisija preprečiti nepričakovane dobičke?
How will the Commission prevent windfall gains?
Komisija je predlagala ukrepe in programe, s katerimi namerava zaščititi delovna mesta v avtomobilski industriji in izboljšati strokovno usposobljenost.
The Commission has proposed measures and programmes to secure employment in the automotive industry and to upgrade professional skills.
Ali je Komisija prepričana, da so ti ukrepi učinkoviti, če pomislimo, da se avtomobilska industrija v EU v povprečju spopada z 20-odstotnim presežkom zmogljivosti, medtem ko je ta delež v svetovnem merilu 30-odstoten?
Is the Commission sure that these measures are effective, considering that the automotive industry is facing an average EU-wide overcapacity of 20%, and of 30% worldwide?
Da bi se povečale naložbe, je v evropskem načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva predlagano javno-zasebno partnerstvo, v okviru katerega bi bilo vsaj 5 milijard EUR namenjenih avtomobilskemu sektorju.
In order to increase investment, the European Economic Recovery Plan proposes a public-private partnership with at least EUR 5 billion for the automotive sector.
Kako lahko Komisija s pomočjo usklajevalnega okvira na evropski ravni zagotovi, da ne bodo posamezni drugačni ukrepi iz programa privedli do nelojalne konkurence?
How can the Commission ensure, by means of a coordinating framework at European level, that divergent single measures within the programme will not distort competition?
Sporočilo o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za ukrepe v zvezi s finančnimi institucijami v okviru trenutne svetovne finančne krize, december 2008 (UL C 16, 22.1.2009, str.
Communication on the application of State aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions in the context of the current global financial crisis, December 2008 (OJ C 16, 22.1.2009, p.
1); revidirano 25.2.2009 - C(2009) 1270.
1); revised on 25.2.2009 - C(2009) 1270.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0060/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0060/09
Zadeva: Začetek mednarodnih pogajanj o sprejetju mednarodne pogodbe o zaščiti Arktike
Subject: Opening of negotiations designed to lead to the adoption of an international treaty on protection of the Arctic
V sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu "Evropska unija in arktična regija" (KOM(2008)0763) z dne 20. novembra 2008 je odlično predstavljena problematika zaščite in ohranjanja Arktike ter spodbujanja trajnostnega izkoriščanja virov.
The Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament on the European Union and the Arctic region (COM(2008)0763) of 20 November 2008 provides an excellent description of the problems of protecting and preserving the Arctic and promoting the sustainable exploitation of its resources.
V njem je zapisano: „Pogodbe ne določajo posebne ureditve za Arktiko.
As the communication points out: 'There is no specific treaty regime for the Arctic.
Nobena država ali skupina držav nima suverenosti nad severnim tečajem ali Arktičnim oceanom, ki ga obdaja.“
No country or group of countries has sovereignty over the North Pole or the Arctic Ocean around it.'
Upoštevati je treba razvoj na področju tehnologije, okolja in prava po sprejetju konvencije Združenih narodov o pravu morja (Montego Bay 1982) .
Account must be taken of the technological and environmental developments which have occurred since the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay, 1982) .
Ozemeljska nesoglasja na tem območju, kjer bi ekonomski interesi lahko bili pomembni, bi to območje lahko spremenila v prizorišče večjih konfliktov med državami, ki bi celo z vojaško silo želele zavarovati tisto, kar štejejo za svoj nacionalni interes.
There is a danger that territorial disputes in this zone, where economic interests may be significant, could make it a theatre of major conflicts between countries wishing to protect - including militarily - what they see as their national interests.
Geopolitična nevtralizacija bi omogočila večje sodelovanje Evropske unije z državami arktičnega kroga.
Geopolitical neutralisation would enable cooperation between the European Union and the circumpolar nations to be extended.
Ali se Svet strinja, da regionalna varnost Arktike zadeva tudi Evropsko unijo, ne samo obalnih držav?
Does the Council not think that the regional security of the Arctic is of concern to the European Union and not merely to the countries bordering the zone?
Katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti Svet, da bi Arktika postala območje miru in sodelovanja, namenjeno samo miroljubnim dejavnostim, varno pred ozemeljskimi nesoglasji, in za vzpostavitev sodelovanja glede varnosti na Arktiki?
What steps does the Council plan to take to make the Arctic a zone of peace and cooperation, reserved solely for peaceful activities and free of disputes over sovereignty, and to develop security cooperation in the Arctic?
Ali je Svet pripravljen podpreti začetek mednarodnih pogajanj za sprejetje mednarodne pogodbe o zaščiti Arktike, kako je Evropski parlament predlagal v svoji resoluciji z dne 9. oktobra 2008 ( P6_TA(2008)0474 )?
Is the Council prepared to pursue the opening of international negotiations designed to lead to the adoption of an international treaty for the protection of the Arctic, having as its inspiration the Treaty on the Antarctic, as suggested by the European Parliament in its resolution of 9 October 2008 ( P6_TA(2008)0474 )?
Ali bo Svet uvrstil Arktiko na dnevni red prihodnjega vrha EU-Rusija?
Does the Council intend to include the Arctic in the agenda for the forthcoming EU/Russia summit?
Gl.: pogodba o zaščiti arktičnega okolja študijske skupine za Arktiko
See Treaty on the protection of the Arctic environment by the Arctic Study Group
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0061/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0061/09
Zadeva: Začetek mednarodnih pogajanj o sprejetju mednarodne pogodbe o zaščiti Arktike
Subject: Opening of international negotiations designed to lead to the adoption of an international treaty for the protection of the Arctic
V sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu "Evropska unija in arktična regija" (KOM(2008)0763) z dne 20. novembra 2008 je odlično predstavljena problematika zaščite in ohranjanja Arktike ter spodbujanja trajnostne rabe virov.
The Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament on the European Union and the Arctic region (COM(2008)0763) of 20 November 2008 provides an excellent description of the problems of protecting and preserving the Arctic and promoting the sustainable exploitation of its resources.
Ali se Komisija ne strinja, da ogroženost Arktike zahteva odziv mednarodnega prava na te izzive, in da bi zgolj enotna mednarodna nadzorna ureditev zagotovila zaščito tega edinstvenega okolja?
Does the Commission not think that the threat to the Arctic environment warrants a response at the level of international law commensurate with the challenges faced and that only an international monitoring system can ensure the protection of this unique environment?
Ali Komisija ne meni, da bi bila lahko zavezujoča listina, primerljiva s pogodbo o Antarktiki, kakor je Evropski parlament predlagal v svoji resoluciji z dne 9. oktobra 2008 ( P6_TA(2008)0474 ) rešitev za težave, ki jih je Komisija predstavila v svojem sporočilu?
Does the Commission not think that a binding Arctic charter along the lines of the Treaty on the Arctic, as proposed by the European Parliament in its resolution of 9 October 2008 ( P6_TA(2008)0474 ), could offer a solution to the problems described by the Commission in its communication?
Katere konkretne spremembe v predpisih Mednarodne pomorske organizacije bi Komisija predlagala, da bi okrepili mednarodna pravila o varnosti pomorskega prometa v še posebej občutljivih območjih te regije?
What specific amendments could the Commission propose to the provisions of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) in order to strengthen the international rules on maritime traffic safety in the particularly sensitive parts of this region?
Ali bi bila Komisija naklonjena polarnemu kodeksu o plovbi na arktičnih območjih, s katerim bi to zagotovili?
Would the Commission support a 'polar navigation code' for the Arctic to safeguard the region's security?
Ali je Komisija začela pogajanja z ruskimi oblastmi za zagotovitev proste plovbe in pravice prehoda ter nediskriminatornih praks, zlasti glede plačila, obveznih storitev in ureditve, da se zagotovi stroškovna učinkovitost novih pomorskih poti?
Has the Commission opened negotiations with the Russian authorities to guarantee freedom of navigation and right of passage and ensure that no discriminatory practices are followed, especially as regards charges, compulsory services and rules and regulations, so as to ensure the viability of new shipping routes?
Ali bi bila Komisija naklonjena moratoriju za izkoriščanje arktičnih geoloških virov za petdeset let, da bi počakali na nove znanstvene izsledke?
Would the Commission support a 50-year moratorium on the exploitation of the Arctic's geological resources, pending fresh scientific research?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0062/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0062/09
Od 4. do 14. maja 2009 bo potekalo 17. zasedanje komisije Združenih narodov za trajnostni razvoj.
From 4 to 14 May 2009, the United Nations will hold the 17th session of its Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD).
Glavne teme zasedanja bodo kmetijstvo, dezertifikacija in suša, posebna pozornost pa bo posvečena Afriki.
The 17th policy session will focus particularly on agriculture, desertification and drought, taking a special interest in Africa.
Vprašanja so zelo pereča, še posebej v zvezi s prilagajanjem na podnebne spremembe.
These issues are highly topical, particularly in terms of adaptation to climate change.
Kakšno strategijo je za zasedanje pripravil Svet?
What is the Council strategy for the 17th session of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development?
Kako bo Svet zagotovil skladnost in dopolnjevanje procesa komisije ZN za trajnostni razvoj z drugimi večstranskimi sporazumi o okolju, kot je Konvencija ZN o boju proti širjenju puščav, s prizadevanji v okviru Okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja in njenega kjotskega protokola ter s sodelovanjem v okviru Globalnega zavezništva proti podnebnim spremembam?
How will the Council ensure coherence and complementarity of the CSD process with other multilateral agreements on the environment, such as the UN Convention to Combat Desertification, and work undertaken under the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol thereto, as well as cooperation under the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA)?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0063/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0063/09
Kakšno strategijo je za zasedanje pripravila Komisija?
What is the Commission strategy for the 17th session of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila skladnost in dopolnjevanje procesa komisije ZN za trajnostni razvoj z drugimi večstranskimi sporazumi o okolju, kot je Konvencija ZN o boju proti širjenju puščav, s prizadevanji v okviru Okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja in njenega kjotskega protokola ter s sodelovanjem v okviru Globalnega zavezništva proti podnebnim spremembam?
How will the Commission ensure coherence and complementarity of the CSD process with other multilateral agreements on the environment, such as the UN Convention to Combat Desertification, and work undertaken under the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol thereto, as well as cooperation under the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA)?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0064/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0064/09
Zadeva: Vloga kulture v razvoju evropskih regij
Subject: The role of culture in the development of European regions
Evropska kultura je eden najpomembnejših stebrov sedanje in prihodnje Evropske unije.
European culture is one of the most significant pillars of the present and future of the European Union.
S tem bomo zagotovili Evropo Evropejcev, ne zgolj Evropo institucij, administracije in predpisov.
This will ensure that we have a Europe of Europeans, and not just a Europe of institutions, administrations and regulations.
Evropske potencialne potrebe v zvezi s kulturo je treba strateško uporabiti za strukturno in spodbujevalno politiko, ki bo podpirala razvoj svojih regij in mest.
Europe's cultural potential needs to be strategically utilised for the structural and promotional policies supporting development in its regions and cities.