natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Si lahko predstavljate, da bi Hrvaška skupaj s Srbijo in drugimi državami Zahodnega Balkana pristopila k Uniji?
Is it conceivable that Croatia and Serbia and the other Balkan countries could eventually join together at the same time?
Hrvaška se mora EU priključiti kar se da hitro.
Croatia must join as soon as possible.
Upam, da bo tudi Srbija storila vse potrebno kar se da hitro.
I hope that Serbia will also do everything to join as soon as possible.
Vendar obstajata dva različna 'kar se da hitro'.
But they are two different "as soon as possible".
Prvi je tik pred našimi očmi, za drugega pa je še zmeraj treba veliko storiti."
The first is very clear before our eyes and for the second there is still a lot of work to be done.
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20091113FCS64416 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20091124IPR65090 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20090925STO61219 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20091124IPR65100 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20091106STO63894 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20090925STO61219 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT MOTION P7-RC-2009-0142 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20091113FCS64416 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20091124IPR65100 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20091106STO63894 0 NOT XML V0//EN
Telekomunikacijska zakonodaja bo imela varovalke pred omejitvijo dostopa do interneta
Telecoms Package: internet access safeguarded
Europarltv: Cenejši internet za Evropejce?
The News: Cheap Internet for Europeans?
O tem so se v začetku novembra dogovorili evropski poslanci in predstavniki Sveta, končno glasovanje pa bo na dnevnem redu na naslednjem plenarnem zasedanju 24. novembra v Strasbourgu.
After nearly 2 years of legislative work the Telecom Package is due to be put to a final vote in Parliament on 24 November in Strasbourg.
Kompromisno besedilo direktive o elektronskih komunikacijah še določa, da morajo biti postopki za morebitne nujne primere v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo.
From the start of negotiations, Parliament has demanded the establishment of adequate procedural safeguards for internet access, in line with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Švedski internetni pirat in evropski poslanec Christian Engström se že več let bori za pravice uporabnikov interneta.
Restrictions on a user's internet access may now "only be imposed if they are appropriate, proportionate and necessary”.
Po doseženem sporazumu o novi zakonodaji je povedal: "Priznati moram, da nikoli nisem niti pomislil, da se bo kaj takega zgodilo.
Swedish Pirate MEP Christian Engström , who for years have been fighting for internet users rights, said after the compromise was reached: "To be honest, I never thought this would happen.
To sicer ni vse, kar bi si želeli v popolnem svetu, pa tudi boj za svobodnejši in bolj odprt internet še ni končan.
It is not everything that we would have wanted in the best of worlds, and this is not the end of the fight for a free and open internet.
Vendar pa je veliko večji korak v smeri, o kateri si niti razmišljati nismo upali. "
But it is a much bigger step in the right direction than I would have dared to hope for."
Tretje branje v Parlamentu bo na plenarnem zasedanju 24. novembra.
Parliament's final vote is scheduled for 24 November.
V tem branju lahko Svet in Parlament samo zavrneta ali sprejmeta predlagano besedilo, ne moreta pa mu dodajati dopolnil.
Parliament and Council may only approve or reject the current proposal, they may not amend it.
V Parlamentu za sprejem zadostuje navadna večina oddanih glasov, medtem ko morajo predstavniki Sveta doseči kvalificirano večino.
If Parliament or ministers decide not to approve the legislation, the electronic communications framework directive will not be adopted.
Če bodisi Parlament ali Svet ne bi potrdil skupnega besedila, bi to pomenilo zavrnitev predloga direktive o elektronskih komunikacijah, kar pomeni, da se lahko zakonodajni postopek vnovič začne samo s popolnoma novim predlogom Komisije.
That means to make any changes to the existing rules, the Commission will have to come up with a new proposal.
20091113STO64409 Pogovor s Christianom Engströmom Europarltv: Vidal Quadras - Uspeli smo zagotoviti pravice uporabnikov interneta
20091113STO64409 Background note on The Telecoms Package Press release "Pirate" MEP Christian Engström Interview with EP conciliation delegation leader Vidal- Quadras
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20090709STO57831 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20090709STO57831 0 NOT XML V0//EN
Osem najbolj opaznih dogodkov na plenarnem zasedanju
8 things that caught our eye during the Brussels November Plenary session
Dvajseta obletnica padca berlinskega zidu je bila osrednja tema dvodnevnega plenarnega zasedanja pretekli teden v Bruslju.
Among other issues, MEPs urged EU states to pool their research into Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Osrednje teme srečanja naj bi bile podnebne spremembe, energetska varnost in novi splošni sporazum o sodelovanju med EU in Rusijo.
The meeting is expected to focus on climate change, energy security and a new general cooperation agreement between the two.
20091113STO64412 Plenarno zasedanje v Bruslju, 11. in 12. november Tiskovna služba Posnetki zadnjega plenarnega zasedanja Flickr
20091113STO64412 Rundown of 11-12 November Parliamentary sitting Press releases Watch the last plenary session Flickr photo reportage of the sitting
Generalni sekretar Nata Rasmussen poziva k močnejšemu sodelovanju z EU
NATO boss Rasmussen calls for stronger security cooperation with EU
Generalni sekretar Nata Anders Fogh Rasmussen Politično in vojaško sodelovanje je smiselno tako za Evropsko unijo kot za Nato,
Anders Fogh Rasmussen cited Kosovo and Bosnia as good examples of the EU and NATO acting together.
meni generalni sekretar Nata Anders Fogh Rasmussen.
NATO HQ, Brussels, 16 November In an exclusive interview, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen says it "makes sense" for the EU and NATO to cooperate politically and militarily.
Glede Afganistana upa, da bodo že naslednje leto afganistanske oblasti prevzele odgovornost za varnost v državi.
On Afghanistan, he hopes for a transfer of responsibility for security to the Afghans to start next year and on relations with Moscow, he points to common threats and says that "NATO is not an enemy of Russia".
Glede odnosov z Moskvo pa pravi, da Rusija ni Natova sovražnica, in poudarja skupne varnostne interese .
Finally, he likens his present job to his former role as Danish prime minister in that it is all about "consensus building".
"Najprej bi želel poudariti, da imamo zelo pozitivno držo do razvoja močnejše varnostne in obrambne politike EU.
First of all I would like to stress that I have a very positive attitude to the development of a stronger defence and security policy pillar within the EU.
To je pot naprej.
I think that it is the way forward.
Rad bi videl EU, ki je v sodelovanju z Nato sposobna voditi krizno upravljanje in mirovne operacije.
I would very much like to see an EU capable of conducting crisis management and peacekeeping operations in cooperation with NATO.
Razvoj evropske varnostne in obrambne politike Natu ni konkurenčen temveč dopolnilen .
I do not consider the development of ESDP (European Security and Defence Policy) as competition with NATO, but complementary to NATO.
Krepitev sodelovanja je smiselna tako s političnega kot vojaškega vidika.
I think that strengthened cooperation makes sense politically as well as militarily.
Politično zato, ker bi lahko mnoge države članice postale članice obeh organizacij.
Politically, it could be because a majority of the member states are members of both organisations.
Če mi organiziramo pravilno delitev dela, lahko vi dodate vrednote.
If we organise the right division of labour, we could add value, like in Kosovo, where NATO conducts the military operations and the EU a more civilian mission.
Vzemimo za primer Kosovo.
So it's an excellent example of how we can achieve political synergies.
Nato je morala tam izvesti vojaške operacije, EU pa je bila predvsem odgovorna za civilne misije.
I think common procurement (of equipment), common acquisition, collective solutions in general would provide us with more efficient solutions.
V Bosni je bilo prav obratno: mi smo odgovornost za vojaške operacije predali EU.
And we could make more efficient use of money.
To je odličen primer, kako lahko dosežemo politično sinergijo.
Well, there are differences among our members as to how strongly parliaments are engaged in security and defence policy.
Z vojaškega vidika je smiselno, da združimo prizadevanja.
It very much depends on constitutional arrangements.
S skupno nabavo opreme in na splošno s skupnimi rešitvami bi lahko prišli do učinkovitejših rešitev.
In ancient times there was a very long distance between the diplomatic and military establishments and the man on the street.
Denar bi vsekakor lahko porabili bolj učinkovito."
But in today’s world foreign policy, security policy and defence policy are intertwined and interlinked with people's daily lives.
V začetku decembra boste v Moskvi vodili pogovore z ruskim vodstvom.
In early December you visit Moscow for talks with the Russian leadership.
Kakšno sodelovanje med Natom in Rusijo si prestavljate za prihodnost?
How do you see the future structure of cooperation between NATO and Russia?
"Moja dolgoročna vizija je ustanoviti strateško partnerstvo med Natom in Rusijo.
My long term vision is to establish a strategic partnership between NATO and Russia.
Rusija in zaveznice Nata si konec koncev delijo skupne varnostne interese.
My analysis is that at the end of the day Russia and the allies within NATO share common security interests.
Vendar pa ti spori ne smejo zasenčiti dejstva, da se na številnih področjih soočamo z istimi grožnjami varnosti.
But these disputes should not overshadow the fact that we are faced with the same security threats in a number of areas.
Ena izmed njih je denimo Afganistan.
One of them is Afghanistan.
Rusija je trpela zaradi terorističnih napadov.
Russia has also suffered from internal terrorist attacks.
Širjenje orožij za množično uničevanje in njihovih nosilcev je tretji primer.
Proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery is a third example.
Vsi vemo, da je Rusija znotraj dosega iranskih raket.
We all know that Russia is within reach of Iranian missiles.
Četrto področje je piratstvo, kjer se prav tako soočamo z enakimi grožnjami.
Piracy is a fourth area, where we are faced with the same security threats.
V času afganistanskih volitev so pogosto citirali vašo izjavo, da je bilo napadenih le okoli tri odstotke volišč, kar pomeni, da je Nato na varnostnem področju izvedla odlično delo.
At the time of the Afghan election you were quoted as saying that as only about 3% of polling stations had been attacked NATO had done an excellent job in terms of security.
Ali bi glede na poznejše obtožbe nepravilnosti pri volitvah lahko dejali, da so afganistanske oblasti Nato v določeni meri postile na cedilu?
With the subsequent accusations of fraud, do you think NATO has been let down by the Afghan authorities?
"Še zmeraj drži, da so bile volitve s varnostnega stališča kar uspešne, kajti odprta so bila skoraj vsa volišča in le trije odstotki volišč so bili napadeni.
It's still true that from a security point of view the elections were quite successful as nearly all polling stations opened and only 3% were directly attacked.
Zdaj je to naš izziv in razlog za to, da obnovimo pogodbo med mednarodno skupnostjo ter predsednikom Karzaijem in njegovo vlado, ki bo zagotovila, da slednji dobro upravljajo državo in afganistanskemu prebivalstvu zagotavljajo osnovne storitve.
It's now our challenge, and this is the reason that we have to renew the contract between the international community and President Karzai and his government, to ensure that they provide good governance and deliver basic services to the Afghan people and not least, that they fight corruption effectively.
Nenazadnje se morajo učinkovito boriti proti korupciji.
To that end we need a strengthened engagement from the international community.
Zato pa moramo krepiti vključevanje mednarodne skupnosti."
Public opinion in Europe is getting nervous about troop casualties in Afghanistan.
Kdaj bo lahko Nato razglasila, da je misija v Afganistanu zaključena?
At what point does NATO say the mission is accomplished?
Kakšni so kriteriji, da lahko rečete "naše delo je opravljeno"?
What would be the criteria to say "we have done our job?"
"Misija bo zaključena, ko bodo Afganistanci pripravljeni prevzeti odgovornost za lastno varnost in vodenje lastne države.
Well, it will be mission accomplished when the Afghans are ready to take responsibility for their own security and run their own country.
Jasno je, da ne morem predstaviti točnega urnika, lahko pa opišem pot naprej.
Obviously I am not able to present an exact timetable but I can describe the way ahead.
Afganistancem moramo predati odgovornosti, in sicer provinci za provinco, kajti razviti morajo tudi sposobnost prevzema odgovornosti.
That is to hand over responsibilities to the Afghans, province by province as their capacity to take responsibility develops.
Zato pa moramo usposobiti in izobraziti afganistanske vojake in policijo ter povečati število afganistanskih varnostnih sil.
Therefore we need to train and educate Afghan soldiers and police and increase the Afghan security force.
Nato se je odločila, da bo ustanovila misijo za usposabljanje.
NATO has decided to establish a training mission and it is of crucial importance to ensure that it is up and running and is fully equipped.
Realistično gledano verjamem, da se lahko ta prenos odgovornosti na področjih in območjih, kjer pogoji to dovoljujejo, začne že naslednje leto.
Realistically, I believe that the transfer of responsibilty to the Afghans can start next year in areas and districts where conditions permit it.
Takšen postopen prenos odgovornosti za varnost se bo zgodil na koordiniran način znotraj Nata in ISAF (Mednarodna varnostna sila v Afganistanu)."
This gradual transfer of responsibly for security will take place in a coordinated manner within NATO and ISAF (International Security Assistance Force).
Predsednik Obama je na robu zelo pomembne odločitve o tem, ali naj pošlje dodatne čete v Afganistan.
President Obama is on the verge of deciding whether to send more troops to Afghanistan.
Kaj menite, ali se bo to dejansko zgodilo in kakšne bi bile posledice te odločitve?
Do you have a feeling about what he will do and the implications?
"Mislim, da bomo na koncu imeli več virov, več čet, čeprav je še prezgodaj, da bi lahko predstavili natančne podatke.
I think we will end up with more resources, more troops, but its a bit too early to present any exact figure.
Trenutno smo v zelo intenzivni fazi posvetovanja med zaveznicami in parterji znotraj koalicije ISAF, ki jo sestavlja 43 držav.
We are now in a very intense phase of consultation among allies and partners within the international ISAF coalition made up of 43 countries so its takes time.
Potreben je ustrezen čas, da se dejansko zagotovi pravilno odločitev.
I think it is necessary to spend a sufficient amount of time to make sure we really take the right decision.
Jaz se zlasti osredotočam na misijo usposabljanja, kajti verjamem, da je prenos odgovornosti na afganistansko vodstvo resnično korak naprej."
I have a particular focus on the training mission because I really think the transition to Afghan lead is the way ahead.
Nato je na splošno preobremenjena.
But it is still too early to present exact figures.
Vendar pa smo trenutno seveda zelo močno osredotočeni na našo misijo v Afganistanu, kajti v igri je afganistansko prebivalstvo, na prvem mestu pa je seveda naša lastna varnost in mednarodna skupnost.
NATO is currently the world's strongest military alliance with a huge capacity, but of course right now we are very much focused on our mission in Afghanistan, because a lot is at stake for the Afghan people, but first and foremost for our own security and for the international community.
Dovolite, da poudarim, zakaj smo v Afganistanu: zaradi varnosti.
Let me stress why we are in Afghanistan.
Teroristi, ki so 9. septembra 2001 napadli ZDA so ukoreninjeni v Afganistanu.
It is because of security.
Dan po napadu se je zveza Nato prvič v zgodovini odločila, da bo uporabila 5. člen, torej klavzulo za kolektivno obrambo, ki določa, da se napad na eno članico smatra kot napad na vse članice.
The terrorists who attacked the US on 9/11 2001 were rooted in Afghanistan and the following day the NATO alliance invoked, for the first time in its history, Article 5, the collective defence clause, which states that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all of them.
Misija še zmeraj ni končana, pri tem pa gre prav tako za teritorialno obrambo.
The mission is still not accomplished - so right now we are focused on Afghanistan.
Nato je zdaj v procesu razvoja novega strateškega koncepta.
NATO is in the process of developing a new strategic concept.
Države kot so ZDA, UK, Nizozemska in Danska se zavzemajo za bolj globalno strategijo, medtem ko so Francija in mnoge nove države članice na strani bolj regionalno usmerjene strategije.
Countries like the US, the UK, Holland and Denmark prefer a more global strategy, while France and many of the newer member states would prefer a more regional focus.
Na kateri strani ste vi?
What would you prefer?
"Pri tem ne vidim nikakršnega protislovja.
I don't see any contradiction.
To bo ena od osrednjih tem na dnevnem redu našega izvajanja novega strateškega koncepta.
This will be one of the core items on the agenda in our new strategic concept exercise.
Od ustanovitve Nata pred šestdesetimi leti je bila v skladu s 5. členom teritorialna obramba osrednja naloga zveze in tako bo tudi ostalo.
Since NATO was established 60 years ago territorial defence according to article 5 has been our core function it will remain so!
Danes je okoli sedemdeset odstotkov oboroženih sil v Evropi mirujočih.
Around 70% of our armed forces in Europe are stationary.
Če želimo imeti kredibilno teritorialno obrambo, potem moramo zagotoviti, da lahko premikamo ljudi, da imamo bolj mobilno in fleksibilno razvrščeno vojsko.
I think that if we are to make our territorial defence credible, then we have to make sure that we can actually move people around, we have to have a more mobile, a more flexible and more deployable military.
Ne vidim pa nikakršnega protislovja med teritorialno obrambo ter globalnim dosegom in perspektivo.
In conclusion, I do not see any contradiction between territorial defence and a global reach and a global perspective.
Moja vloga bo, da postavim ta most."
My role will be to build this bridge.
Kakšno vlogo lahko telesa kot so Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti danes igrajo na področju varnostne in obrambne politike?
How would you describe the differences between being Prime Minister of Denmark and the Secretary General of NATO?
Vse je odvisno od ustavnih ureditev.
(Laughing) I get that question a lot.
Kot dolgoletni nekdanji parlamentarec lahko rečem, da sem močno za okrepitev vključevanja parlamentarcev v obrambne in varnostne zadeve.
There are similarities and there are differences.
Ključnega pomena za današnji svet je krepitev povezave med ljudmi in tistimi, ki odločajo na področju varnosti in obrambe.
I think that in my case there are more similarities than differences.
V nekdanjih časih je bil zelo veliki razmik med diplomatskimi in vojaškimi ustanovami ter ljudmi na ulici.
Of course it is a particular challenge to the Secretary General of NATO to ensure consensus among 28 nations, 28 individual sovereign nations with 28 particular interests.
Vendar pa so v današnjem svetu zunanja, varnostna in obrambna politika prepletene in povezane z ljudmi v njihovem vsakdanjem življenju na drugačen način, kot smo to bili vajeni v preteklosti."
Having said that, as leader of the government in Denmark I was also in position where I had to create a consensus within the coalition government, which was also a minority government.
V mojem primeru obstaja več podobnosti kot razlik.
And then I had to create the majority in parliament.
Seveda je posebni izziv za generalnega sekretarja Nata, da zagotovi soglasje med 28 suverenimi narodi z 28 individualnimi interesi.
So I think that I come from a political environment where we are used to consensus building.
Čeprav se delovanje v absolutno nacionalnem okolju in mednarodnem okolju v Bruslju med seboj razlikujeta, pa moramo upoštevati, da prihajam iz države z zelo močno tradicijo iskanja soglasja.
There is a difference between operating in a strictly national environment and a international environment in Brussels, but it's not that different.
Na danskem sem se kot predsednik vlade udeleževal tedenskih torkovih srečanj z vlado.
In Denmark I had a weekly meeting with the government on Tuesdays.
Tukaj imam ob sredah tedenska srečanja s Severnoatlantskim svetom.
Here I have a weekly meeting with North Atlantic Council on Wednesdays.
Mogoče je razlika le v torku in sredi (smeh)."
So maybe it’s just the difference between Tuesday and Wednesday.
1987–1992: Davčni minister Danske
1987–1992: Tax minister of Denmark
1990-1992: Minister za ekonomske zadeve Danske
1990-1992: Minister of Economic affairs of Denmark
1998 - 2009: Predsednik danske liberalne stranke (Venstre)
1998 - 2009: Leader of the Danish Liberal Party (Venstre)
2001 - 2009: Premier Danske
2001 - 2009: Prime minister of Denmark
od 2009: Generalni sekretar Nata
2009 - August: Secretary General of NATO
Stockholmski program: poiskati ravnotežje med svobodo in varnostjo
Stockholm programme: balancing liberty and security
Parlament bo o prednostnih nalogah programa razpravljal na plenarnem zasedanju v Strasbourgu naslednji teden.
The European Parliament will discuss the Stockholm priorities during its plenary session next week in Strasbourg.
Poslanci so na seji z naslovom "Zgradimo Evropo za državljane" zaključili, da morajo države članice EU povečati sodelovanje v pravosodnih zadevah, ne da bi pri tem ogrožale nacionalne tradicije in temeljne pravice.
The "Building a Citizen’s Europe" meeting concluded that EU countries must increase cooperation in judicial matters, without compromising national traditions and fundamental rights.
Vprašanje zaupanja
A question of trust
Sodelovanje na tem področju pa ovirajo različne pravne tradicije v državah EU in pomanjkanje medsebojnega zaupanja.
Cooperation is hampered by the different legal traditions in EU countries and a lack of mutual trust and confidence in decisions by other member state authorities.
Kakovost administrativnih odločitev lahko variira in pomembno je, da poudarimo pravno varnost in jamstva, je dejal Anti Avsan iz švedskega parlamenta.
"The quality of administrative decisions can vary and it's important to underscore legal certainty and its guarantees," said Anti Avsan from the Swedish Riksdag.
Evropski komisar za pravosodje Jacques Barrot je dejal, da bo vzajemno priznavanje še naprej ostalo temeljnega pomena, medtem ko je švedska ministrica za pravosodje Beatrice Ask menila, da se bodo morale države EU zanašati druga na drugo.
Justice Commissioner Jacques Barrot said, "mutual recognition will remain the cornerstone," while Swedish Justice Minister Beatrice Ask said EU countries "will have to rely on each other".
Postaviti v ravnotežje med svobodo in varnostjo
Balancing liberty and security
Udeleženci so poudarili, da je treba najti pravo ravnotežje med povečanjem varnosti in zaščito temeljnih pravic: izmenjava podatkov za boj proti čezmejnemu kriminalu in terorizmu je nujno potrebna, vendar je treba hkrati zaščititi zasebnost, osebne podatke in temeljne svoboščine.
Participants stressed the importance of striking the right balance between enhancing security and safeguarding fundamental rights: data exchange to fight cross-border crime and terrorism is necessary but in parallel it's important to protect privacy, personal data and fundamental freedoms.