natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kako namerava odpraviti negativne posledice, ki jih bo sedanji pristop pri izvajanju uredbe imel na inovacije, naložbe in konkurenčnost evropskega prehrambenega sektorja, še zlasti v luči lizbonskega programa in sedanje gospodarske krize?
Could it also indicate how it intends to remedy the negative impact that the current approach to the regulation’s implementation will have on innovation, investment and competitiveness in the European food sector, especially in the light of the Lisbon Agenda and the current economic crisis?
UL L 404, 30.12.2006, str.
OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, p.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0083/2010
Question for oral answer O-0083/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Uvoz blaga, proizvedenega v delovnih taboriščih laogai, v Evropsko unijo
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Import of Laogai-made goods into the European Union
Laogai je sistem zaporov s prisilnim delom v Ljudski republiki Kitajski.
Laogai is the system of forced-labour prisons in the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Sistem laogai je Evropski parlament že obsodil, redno pa se obravnava tudi v dialogu o človekovih pravicah med EU in Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko.
The Laogai system was condemned by the EP and is a regular subject of the EU-PRC Human Rights Dialogue.
Zapori laogai so večinoma gospodarski subjekti z imeni podjetij.
Most Laogai prisons are economic entities with commercial company names.
Imena prikrivajo resnično naravo proizvodov, ki se tako prosto prodajajo v Ljudski republiki Kitajski in zunaj nje.
These names hide the true nature of these products, which are thus sold freely in and outside the PRC.
Taborišča laogai se tudi oglašujejo na internetu, odkritih pa jih je približno 500.
Approximately 500 advertising camps have been identified.
Čeprav so dokazi za to redki, so taborišča laogai po vsej verjetnosti tudi vir številnih ponarejenih izdelkov iz Kitajske.
Though rarely proven, the Laogai is most probably also the source of many Chinese-made counterfeit products.
Združene države Amerike so z uporabo zakona o prepovedi uvoza blaga, ki ga proizvajajo zaporniki, prepovedale prodajo proizvodov številnih tovrstnih družb na trgu ZDA.
Applying their law which prohibits the importation of convict-made goods, the United States (US) has banned the products of several such companies from the US market.
EU takega zakona (še) nima.
The EU has no such law (yet).
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je treba potrošnike in družbe iz EU zaščititi pred nenamernim nakupom blaga, proizvedenega v taboriščih laogai, ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta, ki obsoja sistem laogai, in resolucije o dialogu o človekovih pravicah med EU in Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko,
Considering that EU consumers and companies must be protected against inadvertently purchasing Laogai-made goods, and having regard to the respective EP resolutions condemning the Laogai system and to the EU-PRC Human Rights Dialogues;
Kdaj bo Komisija začela tesno sodelovati z organi ZDA, zlasti s carino, na področju odkrivanja tovrstnega blaga?
When will the Commission start to cooperate as closely as possible with US authorities, especially US customs, on detecting these goods?
Katere ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela, da bi preprečila nelojalno konkurenco, ki izvira iz kršenja osnovnih načel Mednarodne organizacije dela v taboriščih, v katerih so zaporniki prisiljeni v proizvodnjo za prodajo na prostem trgu?
What actions will the Commission take in order to prevent unfair competition resulting from the violation of ILO core principles in camps that force inmates to produce products for the public?
Ali se namerava Komisija na pogajanjih z Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko lotiti tega vprašanja, da bi dosegla obojestransko zavezujoč dogovor, v skladu s katerim bo Ljudska republika Kitajska preprečevala neposredni ali posredni izvoz proizvodov iz taborišč laogai v EU in/ali njihovo prodajo družbam v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, katerih lastniki so iz EU?
Does the Commission intend to raise this sensitive issue during negotiations with the PRC in order to obtain a mutually binding agreement that the PRC will prevent the direct or indirect export of Laogai-made goods to the EU and/or their sale to EU-owned companies in the PRC?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0084/2010
Question for oral answer O-0084/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Listina o pravicah žensk
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Charter of Women's Rights
Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom Okrepljena zaveza za enakost med ženskami in moškimi – Listina žensk, ki je bilo objavljeno na začetku marca 2010 (KOM(2010)0078) ob mednarodnem dnevu žena, je opozorilo, da je enakost med ženskami in moškimi temeljna pravica, zapisana v členu 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
The Commission communication entitled ‘A strengthened Commitment to Equality between Women and Men – A Women’s Charter’ (COM(2010)0078), released at the beginning of March 2010 on the occasion of International Women’s Day, underscored the fact that equality between women and men is a fundamental right, enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Prav tako je določilo pet temeljnih področij ukrepanja za spodbujanje enakosti v naslednjih petih letih.
It also set out five key areas for action during the next five years to promote equality.
EP pričakuje, da bo Komisija do septembra 2010 sprejela novo celostno strategijo za enakost med ženskami in moškimi.
The EP is looking forward to the new, comprehensive strategy for equality between women and men, due to be adopted by the Commission by September 2010.
Ali lahko Komisija seznanja Evropski parlament o napredku, ki je bil dosežen od marca 2010 pri pripravi nove strategije?
Can the Commission inform Parliament about developments since March 2010, in particular with regard to preparation of the new strategy?
Katere konkretne korake bodo sprejeli posamezni komisarji, da bi izpolnili cilje, s katerimi bi se okrepilo prizadevanje za enakost med spoloma, ki ga opredeljuje sporočilo Komisije?
What practical steps will be taken by each commissioner to fulfil the goals defined in the Commission’s communication with a view to ensuring greater commitment to gender equality?
Kako namerava Komisija izpolniti obvezo, da bo zagotavljala popolno uresničitev sposobnosti žensk in v celoti izkoristila njihove spretnosti, hkrati pa omogočila usklajevanje med delom, družino in zasebnim življenjem?
How does the Commission plan to fulfil its commitment to ensure the full realisation of women’s potential and the full use of their skills, while at the same time ensuring that people can satisfactorily reconcile work, family and private life?
Katere instrumente namerava Komisija uporabiti, da bi občutno zmanjšala razliko v plačah med spoloma?
What instruments does the Commission plan to use to reduce the gender pay gap significantly?
Katere ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bi zagotovila pravičnejšo razporeditev vodilnih mest v javnem življenju in gospodarstvu med ženskami in moškimi?
What steps does the Commission plan to take to ensure fairer representation of women and men in positions of power in public life and the economy?
Sporočilo izraža pripravljenost Komisije, „da dela na enakosti spolov v partnerstvu z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, vključno s civilno družbo, na nacionalni, evropski in mednarodni ravni“.
The communication expressed the Commission’s ‘readiness to work on gender equality in partnership with all stakeholders, including civil society, at national, European and international levels’.
Kako namerava Komisija vključiti Evropski parlament v ta delovni postopek?
How does the Commission intend to involve Parliament in this working process?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0085/2010
Question for oral answer O-0085/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Vizumska obveznost v Kanadi za češke, romunske in bolgarske državljane
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Canadian visa obligation for Czech, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens
Med nedavnim srečanjem na vrhu med EU in Kanado je bila sprejeta obveza o odpravi preostalih ovir za potovanje brez vizumov za vse državljane Unije.
During the recent EU-Canada Summit a commitment was made to resolve the remaining obstacles to achieving visa-free travel for all EU citizens.
Vseeno pa se je pri procesu zataknilo s ponovno uvedbo vizumske obveznosti za češke državljane, ki želijo vstopiti v Kanado, in z ohranjanjem vizumske obveznosti za romunske in bolgarske državljane.
However this process is being hampered by the reintroduction of a visa requirement for Czech citizens who wish to enter Canada, as well as by the imposition of the visa requirement for Romanian and Bulgarian citizens.
Takšno stanje slabi skupno vizumsko politiko EU, ki temelji na vzajemnosti in naj bi krepila pravico do prostega gibanja za vse državljane Unije.
This current state of affairs is undermining the common EU visa policy which is based on reciprocity and is meant to promote the right of free movement for all EU citizens.
Brez vsakršnega dvoma stoji v tej zadevi Komisija na strani državljanov Unije in njenih držav članic.
There should be no doubt that, in this matter, the Commission stands on the side of EU citizens and EU Member States.
Kako Komisija ocenjuje dosedanjo učinkovitost pristopa Unije k temu vprašanju?
How does the Commission assess the effectiveness of the EU’s approach to the issue up to now?
Kakšno stališče zavzema Komisija do poskusov, s katerimi želi Kanada odpravo vizumske obveznosti podrediti različnim pogojem, kot so reforma kanadskega azilnega sistema ali zmanjšanje števila prosilcev za azil ali politike za družbeno vključevanje manjšin v posameznih državah članicah EU?
What is the Commission’s position on Canadian attempts to subject the lifting of the visa obligation to different conditions, such as the reform of the Canadian asylum system or a decrease in the number of asylum seekers or the minority integration policies in an EU Member State?
Ali namerava Komisija na Kanado izvajati pritisk, da bi ta država dejansko odpravila vizumsko obveznost?
Does the Commission intend to apply any pressure on Canada to undertake to lift the visa obligation in concrete terms?
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, kakšna sredstva bo uporabila Unija za dosego cilja?
If so, what means is the EU going to employ in achieving this goal?
Kaj konkretno bo Komisija naredila za izvršitev izjave z vrha?
What concrete steps will the Commission take to implement the Summit Statement?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0086/2010
Question for oral answer O-0086/2010
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: "Zakon za utišanje medijev" v Italiji
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: 'Gag law' in Italy
V italijanskem parlamentu poteka razprava o predlogu Berlusconijeve vlade za spremembo zakona o prisluhih telefonskih pogovorov (zlasti glede meril in postopkov za pooblastilo, vrste kaznivih dejanj, zajetih v zakonu, elektronskega nadzora, trajanja pooblastila za prisluhe, uporabe informacij v zvezi z drugimi kaznivimi dejanji, ki so bile pridobljene s prisluhi, in izvzetja poslancev in duhovnikov iz zakona) in omejevanju možnosti objave magnetogramov prisluhov z določitvijo strogih kazni za medije, tudi novejše, ki v obdobju pred pripravljalnim narokom, ki v Italiji lahko traja od tri do šest, včasih celo deset let, objavijo informacije o sodnih preiskavah.
The Italian Parliament is examining a proposal by the Berlusconi government to amend the wiretap law (notably in relation to the criteria and procedures for authorisation, the types of crime covered, electronic surveillance, duration of wiretap authorisation, use of wiretapped information in relation to other crimes, and exceptions for MPs and priests) and to limit the possibility of publishing wiretap transcriptions by severely punishing media – including new media – that carry information about judicial inquiries prior to the preliminary hearing stage, i.e. for a period which, in Italy, can range from three to six, or sometimes up to 10, years.
Novi osnutek zakonodaje v Italiji povzroča precejšnje skrbi: nacionalno združenje sodnikov in državnih tožilcev je izrazilo bojazen, da bi zakon oslabil moč razpoložljivih orodij za preprečevanje kriminala in zaščito varnosti državljanov.
Major concerns about the new draft legislation have been voiced in Italy: the National Association of Magistrates fears it will result in a weakening of the tools available for combating crime and protecting citizens’ security.
Pri italijanskem združenju izdajateljev časopisov, nacionalnem združenju italijanskega tiska in novinarskem združenju pa so zakon označili za „zakon za utišanje medijev“ ter še zlasti kritizirali visoke predvidene kazni.
The Italian Federation of Newspaper Editors, the National Federation of the Press and the Journalists’ Association have labelled it a ‘gag law’, criticising in particular the high fines proposed.
Glede predlaganih sprememb so izrazili skrb tudi organi ZDA, vključno s pomočnikom državnega tožilca Lannyjem Breuerjem.
US authorities, including Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, have also expressed concerns about the planned changes.
Ali Komisija meni, da so predlagane spremembe italijanskega zakona o prisluhih sorazmerne in skladne z evropskimi standardi o svobodi informiranja, svobodi medijev in pravici državljanov do obveščenosti, kot jih zagotavljajo člen 11 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah, člen 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah ter ustrezna sodna praksa?
Does the Commission think that the proposed changes in Italy’s wiretap law are proportionate and in line with European standards on freedom of information, media freedom and the citizen’s right to know, as guaranteed by Article 11 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and related case law?
Ali so po mnenju Komisije predlagane spremembe združljive s cilji EU o preprečevanju kriminala v Evropi?
Does the Commission think that the proposed changes are compatible with the EU objectives on combating crime in Europe?
Ali Komisija meni, da so predlagane spremembe, katerih cilj je po izjavah predlagateljev preprečevanje kršitev tajnosti postopka in varovanje zasebnosti, sorazmerne, če upoštevamo učinek, ki ga bodo imele v praksi, tj. je občutno omejevanje dejavnosti kazenskega pregona, s katerimi država s preprečevanjem in zatiranjem kriminala zagotavlja varnost državljanov, ter omejevanje svobode informiranja?
Does the Commission think that the proposed changes – the declared aims of which are to prevent violations of trial secrecy and to protect privacy – are proportionate in relation to the practical effect they will have in severely limiting state law-enforcement activity directed at guaranteeing citizens’ security through the prevention and repression of crime, and in restricting freedom of information?
S katerimi ukrepi bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo v Italiji in v EU zagotovljene svoboda informiranja, svoboda izražanja in svoboda tiska, ter da bo boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu učinkovit?
What steps will the Commission take to ensure that freedom of information, freedom of expression and freedom of the press are guaranteed in Italy and in the EU and that the fight against organised crime in Italy and the EU is effective?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0087/2010
Question for oral answer O-0087/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Krepitev pakta za stabilnost in rast
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Strengthening the Stability and Growth Pact
Sedanja evropska finančna kriza zahteva dosledne ukrepe.
Europe’s latest financial crisis calls for determined action.
Da bi se s to krizo spoprijeli in preprečili novo, sta nujno potrebna okrepitev in nadaljnji razvoj pakta za stabilnost in rast.
To deal with this crisis and prevent a new one, it is essential to develop and strengthen the Stability and Growth Pact.
Kako bo Evropski parlament vključen v odločitve o paketu finančne pomoči EU v višini 60 milijard evropskih sredstev? (člen 352 Pogodbe EU)
How will the European Parliament be involved (pursuant to Art. 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) in decisions concerning the EU rescue package which contains EU appropriations to the tune of EUR 60 billion?
Kako Svet ocenjuje predloge Van-Rompuyeve skupine, ki jih je 8. junija 2010 odobril in podprl Svet ECOFIN?
What is the Council’s view of the proposals of the Van Rompuy Group, endorsed and recommended by the ECOFIN Council on 8 June 2010?
Kako Svet ocenjuje predlog o ustanovitvi medinstitucionalne „ekonomske vlade“ za evroobmočje?
What is the Council’s view of proposals for the creation of an inter-institutional ‘economic government’ for the euro zone?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0088/2010
Question for oral answer O-0088/2010
Kako Komisija ocenjuje predloge Van-Rompuyeve skupine, ki jih je 8. junija 2010 odobril in podprl Svet ECOFIN?
What is the Commission’s view of the proposals of the Van Rompuy Group, endorsed and recommended by the ECOFIN Council on 8 June 2010?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje predlog o ustanovitvi medinstitucionalne „ekonomske vlade“ za evroobmočje?
What is the Commission’s view of proposals for the creation of an inter-institutional ‘economic government’ for the euro zone?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0089/2010
Question for oral answer O-0089/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Evropski sektor za krompirjev škrob po letu 2012
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: European potato starch sector after 2012
V strategiji Evropa 2020 je poudarjeno, da mora Evropa spodbujati gospodarstvo, ki bo bolj konkurenčno in okolju prijaznejše ter bo gospodarneje izkoriščala vire.
The Europe 2020 strategy emphasises that Europe needs to promote a 'more resource efficient, greener and more competitive economy'.
Gospodarstvo na ekološki osnovi, v kateri ima biomasa pomembno vlogo za oskrbo z energijo, gorivom in plinom ter nadomešča surovine v kemični industriji, je nujna prednostna naloga trajnostne gospodarske rasti.
A bio-based economy, where biomass plays an important role in the supply of energy, fuel and gas and replaces raw materials in the chemical industry, is essential within this priority of 'Sustainable growth'.
Industrija krompirjevega škroba ima lahko v takšnem gospodarstvu pomembno vlogo, saj z razvojem kemije škrobov in bioloških proizvodov za nove trge ter proizvodov, ki prispevajo k trajnostnemu potrošništvu in razvoju v EU, postaja gospodarstvo okolju prijaznejše.
The potato starch industry can play an important role in a bio-based economy by greening the economy through the development of starch-based chemistry and developing bio-based products for new markets, products that contribute to a more sustainable consumption and production in the EU.
Konec podpore EU leta 2012 pomeni, da sektor ne bo več prejemal več kot 160 milijonov evrov podpore.
The end of EU support in 2012 will mean that more than € 160 million of EU support will no longer reach the sector.
Po pričakovanjih bi tako izgubil do 40 % sedanjih trgov.
The potato starch sector is expected to lose up to 40% of its current markets.
Današnje stanje, z učinki sedanje ekonomske krize na omenjeno panogo, je samo težava časovne razporeditve.
Today's issue therefore, bearing in mind the effects of the current economic crisis on the sector, is only a problem of timing.
Kako bo Komisija po letu 2012 preprečila uničenje pomembnega sektorja krompirjevega škroba v Evropski uniji?
How will the Commission act to prevent the destruction of the valuable potato starch sector in the European Union as from 2012?
Ali Komisija predvideva uvedbo začasnih ukrepov – v okviru proračuna – , ki bodo omogočali strukturiran „nežen pristanek“ na prostem trgu?
Will the Commission consider putting interim measures - within current budgetary limits - in place to provide for a structured 'soft landing' on the free market?
Lahko Komisija uvede prostovoljno shemo za prestrukturiranje: podjetja, ki prostovoljno zmanjšajo proizvodno zmogljivost, bi morala dobiti pomoč za prestrukturiranje?
Can the Commission introduce a voluntary restructuring scheme, in the sense that those companies that voluntarily reduce their production capacity should be given restructuring aid?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0090/2010
Question for oral answer O-0090/2010
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Priprave za prihodnji sestanek voditeljev EU in Brazilije 14. julija 2010 v Brasilii
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Preparations for forthcoming EU-Brazil summit in Brasilia on 14 July 2010
Ali bi nas Svet lahko obvestil o namenu tega novega sestanka voditeljev, razen podpisa sporazuma na področju civilnega letalstva?
Could the Council provide information about the objectives of this new summit, other than the signing of a civil aviation agreement?
Ali je bil glede na zaključke in zaveze v zvezi trajnostnim razvojem in bojem proti revščini, sprejete na tretjem sestanku voditeljev EU in Brazilije 6. oktobra 2009 v Stockholmu, dosežen znaten napredek, zlasti na področju podnebnih sprememb in uporabe obnovljive energije?
Bearing in mind the conclusions reached and the commitments made at the third EU-Brazil summit in Stockholm on 6 October 2009, what significant progress has been made, particularly in the area of climate change and the use of renewable energies in the context of sustainable development and the fight against poverty?
Ali so bili doseženi cilji glede ohranjanja in trajnostne uporabe biotske raznovrstnosti in storitev ekosistemov, določeni v Stockholmu?
Have the objectives set at Stockholm in relation to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and to ecosystem services been upheld?
Ali se bodo pogajanja v zvezi z razvojno agendo iz Dohe zaključila v letu 2010, v skladu z izjavo skupine G20 ob zaključku sestanka voditeljev držav v Pittsburghu?
Will the talks on the Doha Development Round be concluded in 2010, in accordance with the declaration adopted by the G20 at the end of the Pittsburgh summit?
Glede na zaveze, ki sta jih sprejeli Brazilija in Evropska unija na področju politike razoroževanja in neširjenja jedrskega orožja, kakšno je mnenje EU o sedanjih odnosih med Brazilijo in Iranom?
In the light of the commitments made by Brazil and the EU in the area of disarmament policy and non-proliferation, how does the EU view the current state of relations between Brazil and Iran?
Kakšno je stališče Evropske unije glede na ambicije Brazilije, da postane stalna članica varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov, in kakšno je njeno mnenje o predlogih Brazilije za reformo te organizacije?
What is the EU’s position on Brazil’s goal of becoming a permanent member of the UN Security Council, and on its proposals for reforming that body?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen pri uresničevanju skupnega akcijskega načrta, ki sta ga EU in Brazilija sprejeli na drugem sestanku voditeljev držav v Rio de Janeiru decembra 2008?
Following the adoption of the EU-Brazil Joint Action Plan at the second summit in Rio de Janeiro in December 2008, what stage has been reached in the implementation of this plan?
Kako namerava Svet preseči razhajanja znotraj EU, zlasti na kmetijskem področju, da bi pospešil obnovitev pogajanj z državami Mercosur zaradi sklenitve sporazuma o prosti trgovini?
With a view to moving forward the negotiations with Mercosur designed to lead to the conclusion of a free trade agreement, how does the Council intend to overcome the divergences within the EU, particularly in the area of agriculture?
Kako bo po začetku pogajanj z državami Mercosur o sklenitvi strateškega pridružitvenega sporazuma med obema regijama in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da bo Brazilija v drugi polovici leta 2010 po načelu rotacije predsedovala državam Mercosur, ta sestanek prispeval k napredku pogajanj med EU in državami Mercosur?
Now that talks with Mercosur have resumed and with a view to the conclusion of a strategic association agreement between the two regions, bearing in mind that Brazil will hold the rotating presidency of Mercosur in the second half of 2010, how can the summit help to move the EU-Mercosur negotiations forward?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0091/2010
Question for oral answer O-0091/2010