natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ali razmišlja o alternativnih ukrepih za vizumske olajšave, če Belorusije poenostavitev in sprostitev vizumskih produktov za njene državljane ne zanima.
– will the Commission consider alternative visa facilitation measures if Belarus is not interested in facilitating and liberalising visa products for its citizens?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0037/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0037/08
Zadeva: Vloga agencije Frontex in spoštovanje človekovih pravic
Subject: The role of Frontex and respect for human rights
Nenehno poostrovanje nadzora na mejah EU vse bolj preprečuje, da bi begunci prosili za azil v Evropi.
The constant tightening of EU border controls is having a major impact in preventing refugees from seeking asylum in Europe.
Ker zakonitih migracijskih poti iz tretjih držav v EU skorajda ni, so priseljenci prisiljeni uporabiti nezakonite načine potovanja.
With barely any legal migration routes into the EU from third countries, migrants are forced into resorting to irregular means of travel.
EU je vsako leto priča človeškim tragedijam in umiranju priseljencev, pa tudi vse številnejšim žrtvam trgovine z ljudmi, zlasti pri beguncih, ki priplujejo s severnih obal Afrike, med potjo pa jih veliko umre.
Each year the EU has to witness human tragedies and the loss of lives of migrants as well as an increase of victims of human trafficking, in particular for entrants who arrive by boat from the northern coasts of Africa, many of whom die during the journey.
To dokazuje, da Evropska agencija za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic (Frontex) od svoje ustanovitve leta 2005 ne spoštuje pravic priseljencev do azila in do življenja.
This shows that since its establishment in 2005 the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex), has not respected asylum rights and the right to life for migrants.
Da bi države članice preprečile nezakonito priseljevanje, izvajajo čedalje več ukrepov za nadzor na mejah, ki pa nimajo ustreznih mehanizmov za odkrivanje potencialnih prosilcev za azil in za to, da bi jim dovolili vstop na ozemlje, kasneje pa omogočili dostop do azilnega postopka.
In order to prevent irregular immigration, Member States are implementing an increasing array of border control measures that lack the necessary mechanisms to identify potential asylum seekers and allow their access to the territory and subsequently to an asylum procedure.
Posledica tega je kršitev načela nevračanja iz konvencije o beguncih iz leta 1951 na evropskih mejah.
This is leading to the violation of the principle of non-refoulement as enshrined in the 1951 Refugee Convention at Europe’s borders.
Glede natančnega obsega usklajevalne vloge agencije Frontex in njenega načina izvajanja operacij ni dovolj jasnosti in preglednosti.
There is also a lack of clarity and transparency regarding the exact scope of Frontex’s coordinating role and the way in which its operations are conducted.
Pojasnilo je bistveno, če želimo osvetliti razdelitev odgovornosti in obveznosti do beguncev med agencijo na eni in državami članicami na drugi strani, zlasti v zvezi s spoštovanjem načela o nevračanju.
Clarification is fundamental in order to cast light on the allocation of responsibilities and obligations towards refugees, between the agency on the one hand and Member States on the other, particularly as regards the safeguarding of the non-refoulement principle.
Tudi v zvezi z dejavnostmi agencije Frontex izven notranjih meja EU se pojavlja veliko vprašanj v zvezi s tem, ali je lahko zakonito udeležena pri tovrstnih operacijah in ali lahko pri tem zagotovi, da so njene dejavnosti popolnoma v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Evropske skupnosti, kot sta zakonik o schengenskih mejah in direktiva o azilnih postopkih (2005/85/ES ).
Also the action of Frontex beyond the EU’s external borders raises several questions, in terms of whether it can legally be involved in these kinds of operations and whether it can do so with guarantees that its actions remain in full compliance with the relevant European Community (EC) law, namely the Schengen Borders Code and the Asylum Procedures Directive (2005/85/EC ).
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni razdelitev odgovornosti in obveznosti do beguncev med agencijo Frontex in državami članicami, zlasti v zvezi s spoštovanjem načela nevračanja?
Can the Commission clarify the allocation of responsibilities and obligations towards refugees between Frontex and the Member States particularly as regards the safeguarding of the non-refoulement principle?
Ali Komisija namerava vključiti reševalne akcije priseljencev v mandat agencije Frontex, da bi preprečila številne vsakodnevne človeške tragedije?
Is the Commission planning to include migrant rescue operations in the Frontex mandate in order to stop the numerous human tragedies taking place every year?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, ali je zakonito vključiti agencijo Frontex v dejavnosti izven notranjih meja EU in ali lahko agencija Frontex pri tem zagotovi, da bodo njene dejavnosti še naprej popolnoma v skladu z evropskimi in mednarodnimi sporazumi in z ustrezno zakonodajo Evropske skupnosti, kot sta zakonik o schengenskih mejah in direktiva o azilnem postopku?
Can the Commission clarify whether it is legal to involve Frontex in actions beyond the EU’s external borders and whether Frontex can do so with guarantees that its actions remain in full compliance with European and international agreements and with relevant European Community (EC) law, namely the Schengen Borders Code and the Asylum Procedures Directive?
UL L 326 z dne 13.12.2005, str.
OJ L 326, 13.12.2005, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0038/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0038/08
Zadeva: Naraščajoče cene hrane in dejavnosti za pomoč v hrani v državah v razvoju
Subject: Soaring food prices and food aid operations in developing countries
Cene hrane, kot tudi stroški goriva in prevoza, so skokovito narasle, kar je bistveno zmanjšalo kupno moč številnih družbenih slojev v državah v razvoju in agencij za pomoč v hrani.
Food prices have risen dramatically, as have fuel and transport costs, drastically reducing the purchasing power of broad sectors of society in developing countries and of food aid agencies.
Sredstva svetovnega programa za hrano naj bi bilo potrebno glede na ocene v naslednjih tednih povečati za dodatnih 500 milijonov dolarjev, da bi se zagotovilo izvajanje programov, ki so bili načrtovani v letu 2008.
The World Food Programme (WFP) estimates that at least USD 500m of additional funds is needed in the coming weeks to ensure that the scheduled programmes for 2008 can be implemented.
Kako namerava Svet podpreti takojšnjo sprostitev sredstev, da bi v letu 2008 zagotovili nemoteno izvajanje dejavnosti za pomoč v hrani in zadovoljili dodatne potrebe po tovrstni pomoči, ki so nastale zaradi naraščajočih cen hrane?
How does the Council intend to support the prompt mobilisation of funds in order to ensure that the food aid operations are not interrupted in 2008 and that additional food aid requirements caused by soaring food prices can be met?
Ali Svet meni, da bodo proračunska sredstva Skupnosti, ki jih je Komisija namenila za humanitarno pomoč v letu 2009, zlasti za pomoč v hrani, zadostovala za izpolnitev humanitarnih obveznosti EU v letu 2009, če upoštevamo dejstvo, da naj bi se cene hrane še naprej gibale na sedanji visoki ravni ali se celo še povečevale?
Does the Council consider that the EC humanitarian aid budget planned by the Commission for 2009, in particular regarding food aid, will be sufficient to uphold the EU's humanitarian commitments in the course of 2009, in light of the fact that food prices are expected to remain high or even increase further?
Katere ukrepe načrtuje Komisija za uskladitev humanitarne pomoči EU, zlasti dejavnosti za pomoč v hrani v državah v razvoju, z vse večjimi potrebami?
What steps are envisaged to ensure that humanitarian aid operations supported by the EU, in particular its food aid operations in developing countries, respond to needs arising?
Kako Svet ocenjuje varnost preskrbe s hrano in izzive, povezane s humanitarno pomočjo, z vidika vmesnega pregleda finančnega okvira 2007-2013?
What is the Council's assessment of the food security and humanitarian aid challenges in light of the mid-term review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0039/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0039/08
Sredstva svetovnega programa za hrano naj bi bilo potrebno glede na ocene v naslednjih tednih povečati za dodatnih 500 milijonov dolarjev, da bi se zagotovilo izvajanje programov, ki so bili načrtovani v letu 2008.
The World Food Programme (WFP) estimates that at least USD 500 m of additional funds is needed in the coming weeks to ensure that the scheduled programmes for 2008 can be implemented.
Kako namerava Komisija podpreti takojšnjo sprostitev sredstev, da bi v letu 2008 zagotovili nemoteno izvajanje dejavnosti za pomoč v hrani in zadovoljili dodatne potrebe po tovrstni pomoči, ki so nastale zaradi naraščajočih cen hrane?
How does the Commission intend to support the prompt mobilisation of funds in order to ensure that the food aid operations are not interrupted in 2008 and that additional food aid requirements caused by soaring food prices can be met?
Kateri konkretni ukrepi so bili sprejeti za sprostitev dodatnih sredstev (Skupnosti), na primer iz rezerve za nujno pomoč, zlasti za zagotavljanje takojšnje podpore svetovnemu programu za hrano?
What concrete steps have been undertaken to mobilise additional (Community) funds, such as from the emergency aid reserve, in particular for providing swift support to the WFP?
Ali Komisija meni, da bodo proračunska sredstva Skupnosti, namenjena za humanitarno pomoč v letu 2009, zlasti za pomoč v hrani, zadostovala za izpolnitev humanitarnih obveznosti EU v letu 2009, če upoštevamo dejstvo, da naj bi cene hrane ostale visoke ali se celo povečevale?
Does the Commission consider that the EC humanitarian aid budget planned for 2009, in particular regarding food aid, will be sufficient to uphold the EU's humanitarian commitments in the course of 2009, in light of the fact that food prices are expected to remain high or even increase further?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje varnost preskrbe s hrano in izzive, povezane s humanitarno pomočjo, z vidika vmesnega pregleda finančnega okvira 2007-2013?
What is the Commission's assessment of the food security and humanitarian aid challenges in light of the mid-term review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0040/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0040/08
Zadeva: Palestinski zaporniki v Izraelu
Subject: Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails
V svojem zadnjem poročilu o stanju človekovih pravic na palestinskih ozemljih posebni poročevalec ZN John Dugard pravi, da je bilo od leta 1967 zaprtih več kot 700.000 Palestincev.
In the last report on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories, the UN Special Rapporteur, John Dugard, states that 'since 1967 over 700 000 Palestinians have been imprisoned.
Trenutno je v izraelskih zaporih 11.000 Palestincev, od tega 376 otrok, 118 žensk, 44 članov palestinskega zakonodajnega sveta in kakih 800 upravno priprtih oseb .
At present, there are some 11 000 prisoners in Israeli jails, a number which includes 376 children, 118 women, 44 members of the Palestinian Legislative Council and some 800 administrative detainees' .
Konec januarja 2008 so izraelske oblasti v upravnem priporu zadrževale 813 Palestincev.
In late January 2008, Israel held 813 Palestinians in administrative detention.
Te ljudi se lahko le na osnovi upravne odločitve v zaporu zadržuje za obdobje do šest mesecev z možnostjo podaljšanja .
These people are held, for renewable periods of up to six months, solely as a result of an administrative decision .
Upravni pripor mednarodno pravo sicer dovoljuje v primeru nevarnosti, ki jo za državno varnost predstavljajo posamezniki, vendar le s strogimi omejitvami.
Administrative detention is allowed under international law, but only with rigid restrictions on its application, to prevent the danger posed to state security by a particular individual.
Izrael pa kriterijev v zvezi z državno varnostjo ni nikoli opredelil.
Israel, however, has never defined the criteria for what constitutes 'state security'.
Izraelska uporaba upravnega pripora torej krši te omejitve.
Israel's use of administrative detention therefore violates these restrictions.
Večina palestinskih zapornikov je zaprtih v Izraelu.
Most Palestinian prisoners are held in jails in Israel.
Poleg tega, da so na ta način pogosto onemogočeni družinski obiski, je to kršitev 76. člena četrte ženevske konvencije, ki pravi, da morajo biti osebe z zasedenega ozemlja priprte v okupirani državi, kjer morajo, če so obsojene, tudi odslužiti kazen.
This - besides making family visits frequently impossible - violates Article 76 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which requires persons from an occupied territory to be detained in the occupied country, and if convicted, to serve their sentences therein.
Zaporniki so podvrženi poniževalnemu ravnanju.
'Prisoners are subjected to humiliating and degrading treatment'.
Zasliševanja potekajo na nečloveški način in včasih mejijo na mučenje.
The interrogation is carried out in an inhuman manner, sometimes amounting to torture.
Hrana je slaba, zapori pa so prenatrpani.
Food is poor, and there is serious overcrowding .
Dve poročili izraelskih nevladnih organizacij iz leta 2007 opozarjata, da so zaporniki podvrženi slabemu fizičnemu ravnanju in da se jim odrekajo osnovne potrebe, na primer onemogočanje spanca za več kot 24 ur.
In 2007, two reports published by Israeli NGOs have shown that arrested persons are subjected to physical ill-treatment and deprived of basic needs, such as sleep, for more than 24 hours.
Ravnanje z otroki je prav tako zaskrbljujoče.
The treatment of children is equally disturbing.
Aretacije, zasliševanja in zaprtja palestinskih otrok so postala v zadnjem letu sistematična.
The arrest, interrogation and imprisonment of Palestinian children have become systematic in recent years.
Konec julija 2007 je bilo v izraelskih zaporih okoli 385 izraelskih otrok.
As at the end of July 2007, there were approximately 385 Palestinian children in Israeli custody.
Te se ponavadi preganja po istem vojaškem režimu kot odrasle Palestince .
These children are usually prosecuted under the same military system which is used with Palestinian adults .
To seveda pomeni kršitev Konvencije ZN o pravicah otroka, ki je v Izraelu začela veljati novembra 1991.
This is of course in violation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which entered into force in Israel in November 1991.
Vendar pa Izrael konvencije na palestinskih ozemljih ne izvaja.
However, Israel denies its applicability to the Palestinian territory.
Ali se Svet zaveda zgoraj omenjene kršitve mednarodnega prava?
Is the Council aware of the above-mentioned violation of international law?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Svet sprejeti, tudi ob upoštevanju člena 2 pridružitvenega sporazuma med EU in Izraelom, da bi zagotovil spoštovanje mednarodnega prava in mednarodnih konvencij, ki jih je sprejela izraelska država?
Taking also into consideration Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, what kind of action does the Council envisage in order to ensure respect for international law, as well as for international conventions, by the State of Israel?
Poročilo posebnega poročevalca ZN o stanju človekovih pravic na palestinskih ozemljih pod zasedbo od leta 1967, A/HRC/7/17, 21. januarja 2008.
Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, A/HRC/7/17, 21 January 2008.
B’Tselem - Izraelski informacijski center za človekove pravice na zasedenih ozemljih: „Palestinci, zaprti iz varnostnih razlogov v Izraelu – uporaba upravnega pripora”.
B’Tselem – The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories "Palestinian Security Detainees in Israel - The Use of Administrative Detention".
Hamoked (Center za zaščito posameznikov), B'Tselem in Javni odbor proti mučenju v Izraelu (PCATI).
Hamoked (Center for the Defence of the Individual) and B'Tselem, and the Public Committee against Torture in Israel (PCATI).
Glej polletno poročilo Defence for Children International za leto 2007, poglavje o Palestini – Palestinski otroci politični zaporniki.
See Defence for Children International, Palestine Section - Palestinian Child Political Prisoners: Semi Annual Report 2007.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0041/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0041/08
Ali se Komisija zaveda zgoraj omenjene kršitve mednarodnega prava?
Is the Commission aware of the above-mentioned violation of international law?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, tudi ob upoštevanju člena 2 pridružitvenega sporazuma med EU in Izraelom, da bi zagotovila spoštovanje mednarodnega prava in mednarodnih konvencij, ki jih je sprejela izraelska država?
Taking also into consideration Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, what kind of action does the Commission envisage in order to ensure respect for international law, as well as for international conventions, by the State of Israel?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0042/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0042/08
Zadeva: Vloga agencije Frontex in spoštovanje človekovih pravic
Subject: Frontex role and respect for human rights
Nenehno poostrovanje mejnih kontrol ima velik vpliv pri preprečevanju, da bi begunci prosili za azil v Evropi.
The constant tightening of EU border controls is having a major impact in preventing refugees from seeking asylum in Europe.
Ker zakonitih migracijskih poti iz tretjih držav v EU skorajda ni, so migranti prisiljeni uporabiti nezakonite načine potovanja.
With barely any legal migration routes into the EU from third countries, migrants are forced into resorting to irregular means of travel.
Vsako leto je EU priča človeškim tragedijam in smrti migrantov, pa tudi vedno številnejšim žrtvam trgovine z ljudmi, zlasti beguncev, ki priplujejo s severnih obal Afrike in jih veliko umre med potjo.
Each year the EU has to witness human tragedies and the loss of lives of migrants as well as an increase of victims of human trafficking, in particular for entrants who arrive by boat from the northern coasts of Africa, many of whom die during the journey.
To dokazuje, da Evropska agencija za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic (Frontex) od svoje ustanovitve leta 2005 ne spoštuje pravic migrantov do azila in do življenja.
This shows that since its establishment in 2005 the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex), has not respected asylum rights and the right to life for migrants.
Da bi države članice preprečile nezakonito priseljevanje, izvajajo čedalje več ukrepov mejnih kontrol, kjer ni ustreznih mehanizmov za odkrivanje potencialnih prosilcev za azil in za to, da bi jim dovolili vstop na ozemlje, kasneje pa omogočili dostop do azilnega postopka.
In order to prevent irregular immigration, Member States are implementing an increasing array of border control measures that lack the necessary mechanisms to identify potential asylum-seekers and allow their access to the territory and subsequently to an asylum procedure.
Posledica tega je kršitev načela nevračanja, kot je zapisano v konvenciji o beguncih iz leta 1951, na evropskih mejah.
This is leading to the violation of the principle of non-refoulement as enshrined in the 1951 Refugee Convention at Europe’s borders.
Pojasnilo je bistveno, če želimo osvetliti razdelitev odgovornosti in obveznosti do beguncev med agencijo na eni in državami članicami na drugi strani, zlasti v zvezi z varovanjem načela o nevračanju.
Clarification is fundamental in order to cast light on the allocation of responsibilities and obligations towards refugees, between the Agency on the one hand and Member States on the other particularly as regards the safeguarding of the non-refoulement principle.
Ali lahko Svet pojasni razdelitev odgovornosti in obveznosti do beguncev med agencijo Frontex in državami članicami, zlasti v zvezi z varovanjem načela nevračanja?
Can the Council clarify the allocation of responsibilities and obligations towards refugees between Frontex and the Member States, particularly as regards the safeguarding of the non-refoulement principle?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0043/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0043/08
Zadeva: Nezakonito preseljevanje, zunanjepolitični ukrepi EU in Frontex
Subject: Illegal migration, external action of the EU and Frontex
Leta 2007 je Evropska agencija za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic (Frontex) odkrila prek 160.000 nezakonitih prehodov zunanjih meja EU, od katerih jih je bilo 135.000 na mejah Grčije, Španije, Italije, Cipra in Francije.
In 2007, the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders, Frontex, detected over 160 000 illegal border crossings at EU external borders, of which over 135 000 crossed the borders of Greece, Spain, Italy, Cyprus and France.
Tudi Malta se sooča z mnogimi nezakonitimi prehodi meje na svoje ozemlje.
Malta is also facing the influx of many illegal border crossings to its territory.
S prihodom pomladi in boljšimi vremenskimi razmerami se bodo tokovi nezakonitega priseljevanja povečali.
With the arrival of spring and better weather conditions, illegal migration flows are likely to rise.
Zaradi tega pojava je EU vsako leto priča človeškim tragedijam in smrti, pa tudi vse številnejšim žrtvam tihotapljenja ljudi, zlasti pri osebah, ki priplujejo s severnih obal Afrike, med potjo pa jih veliko umre.
This phenomenon leads the EU to witness each year human tragedies and the loss of lives as well as an increase of victims of human smuggling, in particular for entrants who arrive by boat from the northern coasts of Africa, many of whom die during the journey.
Ker je Frontex usklajevalna agencija, ustanovljena leta 2005, ne moremo pričakovati, da bi lahko sama zaustavila pritok migrantov.
As Frontex is a coordinating agency created in 2005 we cannot expect it to stop the influx of irregular migrants by itself.
Četudi bi to zmogla, za kaj takega nima pooblastila.
Even if it could, Frontex has no mandate to do so.
Varnost na zunanjih mejah EU je končna odgovornost vseh držav članic, meje pa je treba nadzirati v duhu delitve odgovornosti, solidarnosti med državami članicami in spoštovanja azilnega prava.
EU border security is the ultimate responsibility of all Member States, and border controls must be operated in a spirit of sharing responsibilities, solidarity between Member States and respect for asylum law.
Evropski parlament je 26. aprila 2007 z veliko večino glasoval za predloge oblikovanja mobilnih mejnih straž iz vseh držav članic, ki bodo enakomerno obremenjene.
The European Parliament voted overwhelmingly in favour of proposals to create mobile border guards from all Member States, with the burden distributed evenly, on 26 April 2007 .
Ukrepi obsegajo „načelo obvezne solidarnosti“, ki države članice zavezuje, da si pomagajo pri vprašanjih meja.
The measures include a 'mandatory solidarity' principle, obliging Member States to assist each other on border issues.
Vendar se vsaka država članica sama odloči, ali bodo njeni policisti sodelovali v skupinah za hitro posredovanje na mejah (RABIT), dokler agencija Frontex še nima proračuna, osebja ali opreme, da bi bil njen vpliv pomemben.
However, it is up to each Member State to decide whether it wants its officers to participate in the RABITs (Rapid Border Intervention Teams) or not, while Frontex does not yet have the budget, the staff, or the equipment to make a significant impact.
Kot je izjavil njen direktor: „Centralizirana evidenca razpoložljive tehnične opreme (CRATE) je zgolj virtualna evidenca, ki bo agenciji Frontex v pomoč pri boljšem načrtovanju operacij.
As the director of Frontex has stated: 'The Centralised Record of Available Technical Equipment (CRATE) is just a virtual record that will help Frontex in planning its operations better.