natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The package is of major importance for the creation of a European internal market of electricity and gas and for ensuring a transparent and clear regulatory framework for investments in transmission networks and enhancing regional and all European cooperation.
The package is of major importance for the creation of a European internal market in electricity and gas and for ensuring a transparent and clear regulatory framework for investments in transmission networks and enhancing regional and European cooperation.
On that basis, the energy package contributes greatly to the EU Member States' security of energy supply.
On that basis, the energy package is a major contribution to the EU Member States' security of energy supply.
In this respect, we would like to request the French Presidency to inform us on their intention to present to the EP the common position of the Council on the 5 legislative proposals.
Against this background, we would like to ask the French Presidency to inform us as to their intention to present to the EP the Council common position on the five legislative proposals.
We would appreciate as well detailed information on what steps does the Council, more particularly the Czech Presidency envisage for the continuation and timely conclusion of the legislative process on the 3d Energy package
We would also appreciate detailed information on what steps the Council, and more particularly the Czech Presidency, envisages for the continuation and timely conclusion of the legislative process on the 3d Energy Package.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0121/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0121/08
Zadeva: vropsko območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, medsebojno priznavanje sodb v kazenskih zadevah in nedavna odločitev Francije, da Italiji ne izroči teroristke
Subject: The European area of freedom, security and justice, mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters and the recent French refusal to extradite a terrorist to Italy
Francoska vlada je 13. oktobra 2008 sklenila, da prekliče odločitev prizivnega sodišča v Versaillesu in Italiji ne izroči teroristke Marine Petrella.
The French Government decided, on 13 October 2008, to reverse the decision of the Appeal Court of Versailles and to deny the extradition of a terrorist, Marina Petrella, to Italy.
Ta je bila obsojena zaradi umora, poskusa umora, poskusa ugrabitve in drugih kaznivih dejanj.
Petrella is convicted of murder, attempted murder, attempted kidnapping and other crimes.
Francoska vlada se je sklicevala na klavzulo k evropski konvenciji o izročitvi iz leta 1957, ki se nanaša na starost in zdravstveno stanje iskane osebe, in to kljub dejstvu, da tudi italijanski pravosodni sistem pozna varovala, med njimi pogojno kazen, za osebe, ki zaradi zdravstvenega stanja ali starosti ne morejo prestajati zaporne kazni.
The French Government invoked a clause it had tabled to the 1957 European Convention on Extradition relating to the age and the state of health of the person sought, notwithstanding the fact that the Italian legal system establishes safeguards, including the suspension of the sentence, for convicted persons whose health or age is not compatible with detention.
Ali se Svet ne strinja s sledečim:
Does the Council not agree that:
– zavrnitev zahteve o izročitvi oseb, obsojenih za teroristična dejanja, med njimi umor v teroristične namene, poraja vprašanje o obsegu načela o vzajemnem priznavanju sodb v kazenskih zadevah, ki je eno izmed temeljev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice v EU;
– The refusal to surrender persons sentenced for terrorist acts, including murder with a terrorist purpose, raises questions about the extent of the principle of mutual recognition in criminal matters, which is one of the fundamental pillars of the area of freedom, security and justice in the EU?
– države članice EU bi morale izvajati člen 26 konvencije iz leta 1957, ki podpisnice pooblašča, da čim prej umaknejo zadržke ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se je EU od leta 1957 postopoma razvila v območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki temelji na načelu medsebojnega priznavanja in skupnih standardov v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami;
– Article 26 of the 1957 Convention should be applied by EU Member States, as it mandates State Parties to withdraw reservations as soon as possible, taking into consideration the fact that since 1957 the EU has progressively developed into an area of freedom, security and justice, based on the principle of mutual recognition and common human rights standards?
– na ravni EU bodo sprejete pobude, ki bodo zagotovile, da se načelo vzajemnega priznavanja v kazenskih zadevah v polni meri izvaja in razvija, hkrati pa bodo ob doslednem spoštovanju človekovih pravic oblikovana skupna postopkovna varovala za osumljence in obtožence v kazenskih postopkih?
– Initiatives should be undertaken at EU level in order to ensure that the principle of mutual recognition in criminal matters is fully applied and developed, while setting common procedural safeguards for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings and ensuring full respect for human rights?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0122/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0122/08
Zadeva: Pristop EU do Belorusije - Vstopni vizumi
Subject: EU approach to Belarus - entrance visa
Parlament je v svoji resoluciji P6_TA(2008)0470 z dne 9. oktobra 2008 dal vedeti, da je ta sklep in druge pobude Sveta in Komisije za okrepitev sodelovanja z Belorusijo pripravljen podpreti kot del pristopa, ki bi temeljil na strogem pozitivnem pogojevanju.
In its resolution P6_TA(2008)0470 of 9 October 2008, the European Parliament indicated that it could endorse this decision and other initiatives of the Council and the Commission to strengthen its engagement with Belarus as part of an approach based on strict positive conditionality.
Parlament je prav tako pozval beloruske oblasti, naj odstranijo vizumske ovire za poslance Evropskega parlamenta pri vstopu v njihovo državo.
The Parliament also called on the Belarusian authorities to remove obstacles to MEPs being granted visas for Belarus.
Ali lahko Svet navede, katere pobude je sprejel po 13. oktobru za okrepitev dialoga z Belorusijo in kakšne konkretne rezultate so te prinesle?
Can the Council indicate which initiatives it has taken since 13 October to strengthen dialogue with Belarus and, if so, to which concrete results these have led?
Ali je Svet določil izrecne cilje, ki bi morali biti izpolnjeni za podaljšanje preklica vizumske prepovedi, kot je na primer reforma zakona o množičnih medijih, kot je v svoji resoluciji zahteval Evropski parlament?
Has the Council formulated explicit benchmarks for a possible extension of the lifting of the visa ban, such as reform of the Law on Mass Media as suggested by the European Parliament in its resolution?
Ali namerava Svet v svoj dialog z oblastmi v polni meri vključiti tudi demokratično opozicijo?
Does the Council intend to accompany its dialogue with the authorities by full engagement of the democratic opposition?
Ali Svet ve, da v nasprotju z izjavami beloruskega veleposlaništva v Bruslju poslancem Evropskega parlamenta še vedno niso bili odobreni vizumi za vstop v Belorusijo?
Is the Council aware that, contrary to statements by the Belarusian Embassy in Brussels, MEPs are still being denied visas for Belarus?
Ali se Svet strinja, da bi se morala beloruska vlada v zameno za preklic vizumske prepovedi za beloruske uradnike zavezati, da bo zakonodajalcem EU omogočila popolni dostop na svoje ozemlje in da ne bo omejevala njihove svobode pri srečevanju z državljanskimi in političnimi skupinami?
Does the Council agree that a lifting of the visa ban for Belarusian officials should be reciprocated by a pledge on the part of the Belarusian Government to grant EU legislators full access to the country’s territory and the freedom to meet with civic and political groups?
Ali je Svet pripravljen opozoriti na to vprašanje v svojem dialogu z beloruskimi oblastmi?
Is the Council prepared to raise this issue in its dialogue with the Belarusian authorities?
Ali je Svet seznanjen, da beloruska vlada na žalost še vedno ovira počitniške programe za otroke, ki so bili žrtve černobilske nesreče?
Is the Council aware of the fact that the Belarusian Government is regrettably continuing to obstruct children’s holiday programs for victims of the Chernobyl disaster?
Ali je Svet proti beloruskim oblasti sprejel ukrepe za odpravo teh ovir?
Has the Council taken action vis-à-vis the Belarusian authorities to end this obstruction?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0123/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0123/08
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kakšne pobude je sprejela po 13. oktobru za okrepitev dialoga z Belorusijo in katere konkretne rezultate so te prinesle?
Can the Commission indicate which initiatives it has taken since 13 October to strengthen dialogue with Belarus and, if so, to which concrete results these have led?
Ali je Komisija določila izrecne cilje, ki bi morali biti izpolnjeni za podaljšanje preklica vizumske prepovedi, kot je na primer reforma zakona o množičnih medijih, kot je v svoji resoluciji zahteval Evropski parlament?
Has the Commission formulated explicit benchmarks for a possible extension of the lifting of the visa ban, such as reform of the Law on Mass Media as suggested by the European Parliament in its resolution?
Ali namerava Komisija v svoj dialog z oblastmi v polni meri vključiti tudi demokratično opozicijo?
Does the Commission intend to accompany its dialogue with the authorities by full engagement of the democratic opposition?
Ali Komisija ve, da v nasprotju z izjavami beloruskega veleposlaništva v Bruslju poslancem Evropskega parlamenta še vedno niso bili odobreni vizumi za vstop v Belorusijo?
Is the Commission aware that, contrary to statements by the Belarusian Embassy in Brussels, MEPs are still being denied visas for Belarus?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi se morala beloruska vlada v zameno za preklic vizumske prepovedi za beloruske uradnike zavezati, da bo zakonodajalcem EU omogočila popolni dostop na svoje ozemlje in da ne bo omejevala njihove svobode pri srečevanju z državljanskimi in političnimi skupinami?
Does the Commission agree that a lifting of the visa ban for Belarusian officials should be reciprocated by a pledge on the part of the Belarusian Government to grant EU legislators full access to the country’s territory and the freedom to meet with civic and political groups?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena opozoriti na to vprašanje v svojem dialogu z beloruskimi oblastmi?
Is the Commission prepared to raise this issue in its dialogue with the Belarusian authorities?
Ali je Komisija seznanjena, da beloruska vlada na žalost še vedno ovira počitniške programe za otroke, ki so bili žrtve černobilske nesreče?
Is the Commission aware of the fact that the Belarusian Government is regrettably continuing to obstruct children’s holiday programs for victims of the Chernobyl disaster?
Ali je Komisija sprejela ukrepe proti beloruskim oblasti za odpravo teh ovir?
Has the Commission taken action vis-à-vis the Belarusian authorities to end this obstruction?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0124/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0124/08
Zadeva: rihodnja globalna ureditev finančnih trgov in načrt EU za oživitev gospodarstva
Subject: The future global architecture of financial markets and an EU economic recovery plan
Svetovna finančna kriza in upočasnitev gospodarske rasti zahtevata celovito reformo ureditve delovanja evropskih finančnih trgov in nadzora nad njimi, globalne rešitve in sklop skupnih načel.
The global financial crisis and economic slowdown require comprehensive reforms of regulation and supervision of European financial markets as well as global solutions and a common set of principles.
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji P6_TA(2006)0076 o strateškem pregledu MDS (marec 2006) pozval k celoviti reformi brettonwoodskih institucij, da bi povečali njihovo legitimnost in učinkovitost ter hkrati zagotovili, da bodo odrazile mednarodne gospodarske razmere, poleg tega pa dosegli tudi preusmeritev politike MDS.
In its resolution P6_TA(2006)0076 on the strategic review of the IMF (March 2006), the EP called for a comprehensive reform of the Bretton Wood Institutions to foster their legitimacy and effectiveness, ensuring that they reflect the international economic situation, as well as a reorientation of the IMF policies.
Evropski parlament poudarja, da je osrednja vloga MDS stabilizacija globalnih nihanj menjalnih tečajev, saj posoja sredstva kot zadnji posojilodajalec državam z velikimi težavami v plačilni bilanci, analizira in nadzira razmere na finančnih trgih ter njihove posledice za domačo in globalno finančno stabilnost.
The EP emphasised the IMF’s core role in stabilising global exchange rate fluctuations, acting as a lender of last resort for countries experiencing serious balance of payment problems, analysing and monitoring financial markets developments and implications for domestic and global financial stability.
Tako je vrhunsko srečanje skupine G20 15. novembra 2008 pomembna priložnost za krepitev mednarodnega finančnega sodelovanja in reformo svetovne finančne ureditve.
In this respect, the G20 summit on 15 November 2008 is an important opportunity to enhance international financial cooperation and reform global financial architecture.
Evropski parlament pozdravlja pobudo in med drugim meni, da morajo tisti, ki določajo globalne standarde (na primer forum za finančno stabilnost) misliti globalno, ko razmišljajo o možnih izboljšavah nadzora in upravljanja vseh finančnih institucij, procikličnosti in računovodskih predpisov.
The EP welcomes this initiative and considers amongst others, that global standards setters (e.g. FSF) need to think global when looking at possible improvements of supervision and governance of all financial institutions, pro-cyclicality and accounting rules.
Evropski parlament obžaluje, da predsednik euroskupine ni bil povabljen, da se udeleži tega dogodka, in poziva, da bi morala Evropsko unijo na takšnih srečanjih v prihodnosti predstavljati predsedstvo Sveta in predsednik euroskupine.
The EP regrets that the Eurogroup President was not invited to participate in this event and asks that, in the future, both the Council Presidency and the Eurogroup President represent the European Union in such fora.
Kakšen je prispevek vrhunskega srečanja G20 k temu programu?
What is the contribution of the G20 summit to this agenda?
Kako bi se EU bolje pripravila za naslednji korak v tem procesu?
How should the EU be better prepared for the next step of this process?
Po zadnjih gospodarskih napovedih naj bi imela finančna kriza težke posledice na realno gospodarstvo.
The latest Commission economic forecast predicts that the financial crisis will have severe repercussions for the real economy.
Kako napreduje usklajevanje gospodarskih reševalnih ukrepov držav članic?
What is the state of progress as regards the coordination between Member States’ economic rescue packages?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0125/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0125/08
Zadeva: Prihodnja globalna ureditev finančnih trgov in načrt EU za oživitev gospodarstva
Subject: The future global architecture of financial markets and an EU economic recovery plan
Evropski parlament poudarja, da je osrednja vloga MDS stabilizacija globalnih nihanj menjalnih tečajev, saj posoja sredstva kot zadnji posojilodajalec državam z velikimi težavami v plačilni bilanci, analizira in nadzira razmere na finančnih trgih ter njihove posledice za domačo in globalno finančno stabilnost.
The EP emphasised the IMF´s core role in stabilising global exchange rate fluctuations, acting as a lender of last resort for countries experiencing serious balance of payment problems, analysing and monitoring financial markets developments and implications for domestic and global financial stability.
Evropski parlament pozdravlja pobudo in med drugim meni, da morajo tisti, ki določajo globalne standarde (na primer forum za finančno stabilnost) misliti globalno, ko razmišljajo o možnih izboljšavah nadzora in upravljanja vseh finančnih institucij, procikličnosti in računovodskih predpisov.
The EP welcomes this initiative and considers, amongst other things, that global standards setters (e.g. FSF) need to think global when looking at possible improvements to supervision and governance of all financial institutions, pro-cyclicality and accounting rules.
Evropski parlament obžaluje, da predsednik euroskupine ni bil povabljen, da se udeleži tega dogodka, in poziva, da bi morala Evropsko unijo na takšnih srečanjih v prihodnosti predstavljati predsedstvo Sveta in predsednik euroskupine.
The EP regrets that the Eurogroup President was not invited to participate at this event and asks that, in future, both the Council Presidency and the Eurogroup President represent the European Union in such fora.
Kako napreduje načrt za oživitev evropskega gospodarstva, ki ga je zahteval Ecofin?
What is the state of progress as regards the roadmap for a European economic recovery plan requested by Ecofin?
Ali je predvidena njegova vključitev v pripravo gospodarskih reševalnih ukrepov držav članic, v njihovo usklajevanje in spremljanje njihovega izvajanja?
Does the Commission intend to play a role in the elaboration of Member States’ economic rescue packages, in their coordination and in monitoring their implementation?
Kakšno stopnjo prilagodljivosti, ki je bila omenjena v sporočilu z dne 29. oktobra, bo dovoljeval pakt stabilnosti in rasti?
What will be the degree of flexibility allowed for by the Stability and Growth Pact that was mentioned in its communication of 29 October?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0126/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0126/08
Zadeva: Leto dni po podpisu evropskega soglasja o humanitarni pomoči
Subject: One year on from the signing of the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid
Svet in predstavniki vlad držav članic v Svetu, Evropski parlament in Evropska komisija so 18. decembra 2007 podpisali evropsko soglasja o humanitarni pomoči.
The European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid was signed jointly by the Council and representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission on 18 December 2007.
Pogajanja med tremi institucijami so bila pomembna priložnost za dosego političnega soglasja o načinu ukrepanja v vse bolj zapletenih kriznih razmerah ter za določitev tega, kdaj naj Evropa sprejme humanitarne ukrepe.
The negotiating process between the three institutions was an important opportunity to reach a political consensus on the way to respond to increasingly complex crisis situations and define what is the perimeter of humanitarian action for Europe.
Akcijski načrt Evropske komisije, v katerem so bili predstavljeni konkretni ukrepi za oblikovanje skupnega besedila, je bil sprejet 29. maja 2008, Svet pa ga je potrdil 22. julija 2008.
A European Commission action plan setting out practical measures for implementing this joint text was adopted on 29 May 2008 and approved by the Council on 22 July 2008.
Člen 101 soglasja se glasi: O napredku EU pri izvajanju tega soglasja o humanitarni pomoči bi bilo treba redno razpravljati v Svetu in z Evropskim parlamentom, pregledati pa bi ga bilo treba pet let po podpisu.
According to Article 101 of the Consensus, ‘EU progress in implementation of this Consensus on Humanitarian Aid should be discussed regularly in Council and with the European Parliament …’.
Da bi zagotovili redno preverjanje politike humanitarne pomoči (člen 28 soglasja), je bil mandat delovne skupine za pomoč v hrani razširjen, tako da vključuje tudi humanitarno pomoč , in bo začel veljati 1. januarja 2009.
In order to provide for a regular review of the Humanitarian Aid policy (Article 28 of the Consensus), the Food Aid Group’s mandate has been expanded to include Humanitarian Aid and will enter into force on 1 January 2009.
Kakšen mandat natančno je bil dodeljen v tej novi obliki?
What exact mandate has been granted to this new formula?
Kako namerava Svet izvajati soglasje, še posebej v zvezi z vprašanji usklajevanja in skladnosti?
And how will the Council be implementing the Consensus, in particular in terms of coordination and coherence?
Kakšna je v luči vse večjega števila naravnih nesreč in podnebnih sprememb strategija Evropske unije, da bi v svojo politiko humanitarne in razvojne pomoči vključila zmanjšanje tveganj, povezanih s katastrofami, in pripravo nanje v državah v razvoju?
In view of the growing frequency of natural disasters and climate changes, what is the EU’s political strategy for integrating disaster risk reduction and disaster preparation in developing countries into its humanitarian aid and development policy?
Kakšna pozornost se namenja humanitarnim krizam, pri katerih mednarodna humanitarna pomoč ni ustrezna zaradi premajhnih finančnih sredstev ali ker se je krizo zanemarilo oziroma se je nanjo pozabilo?
What attention is being given to under-financed, neglected or forgotten humanitarian crises, where the international global humanitarian response is inadequate?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Evropska unija sprejeti po mednarodni konferenci o spoštovanju mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, ki je potekala 16. septembra 2008, da bi ohranili humanitarni prostor, ki je potreben za zagotavljanje dostopa do ranljivih skupin prebivalstva ali za varnost humanitarnih delavcev?
What action will the European Union be taking in response to the International Conference on Respect for Humanitarian International Law of 16 September 2008, to preserve the ‘humanitarian space’ needed to guarantee access to vulnerable populations and the safety of humanitarian workers?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0127/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0127/08
Leto dni po podpisu soglasja, bi bilo primerno izvesti oceno ukrepanja Evropske unije na področju humanitarne pomoči.
One year after the Consensus was signed it is time to review the European Union’s action in the field of humanitarian aid.
Katere ukrepe na splošno je sprejela Evropska unija v letu 2008 in katere še namerava sprejeti za izpolnjevanje zavez iz soglasja?
In general terms, what measures has the European Union taken in 2008 and what will it be taking to implement the commitments set out in the Consensus?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0128/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0128/08
Zadeva: Napredek evropskega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice v letu 2008
Subject: Progress in 2008 of the European area of freedom, security and justice (FSJA)
Evropski svet naj bi konec leta 2009 sprejel nov večletni program za evropsko območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
At the end of 2009 the European Council should adopt the new multiannual programme for the FSJA.
Deset let po vrhu v Tampereju je pravni red Evropske unije na tem področju precej obsežen, čeprav se zdi, da je njegov večji del, zlasti na področju varnosti, bolj usmerjen v sodelovanje med upravami kot pa v zaščito in spodbujanje temeljnih pravic državljanov na evropski ravni.
Ten years after Tampere the European Union ‘acquis’ is now substantial, even if its overall balance seems to be more oriented to cooperation between administrations, especially in security matters, than to the protection and promotion at European level of citizens’ fundamental rights.