natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
S sodbo z dne 13. septembra 2005 (zadeva C-0176/03) je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti razjasnilo odnose med politikami prvega in tretjega stebra in prednost prava Skupnosti pred pravom Unije (člen 47 PEU), saj je odločilo, da lahko zakonodajalci Skupnosti od držav članic zahtevajo, da sprejmejo kazenske sankcije, kadar so le-te nujno potrebne za zagotovitev popolne učinkovitosti predpisov Skupnosti.
In its judgment of 13 September 2005 in Case C-0176/03, the Court clarified the relationship between policies under the first and third pillars and the primacy of Community law over Union law (Article 47 of the Treaty on European Union) when it also acknowledged that the Community legislature was entitled to require the Member States to impose criminal penalties, where absolutely necessary, in order to ensure that Community rules were fully effective.
To naj bi še posebej veljalo v primerih, ko so omenjeni predpisi namenjeni zagotavljanju temeljnih pravic, kakršna je pravica do varnega okolja, o kateri je govora v primeru, obravnavanem na sodišču v Luksemburgu.
That would apply in particular where such rules sought to protect fundamental rights such as those relating to a safe environment, as in the case submitted to the Luxembourg Court.
Ali Komisija meni, da bi kazenske sankcije:
Does the Commission agree that:
naj bile predvidene zgolj za primere zakonodajnih postopkov, v katerih Evropskih parlament sodeluje v postopku soodločanja;
criminal penalties may be applied only in connection with legislative procedures in which the European Parliament is involved under the codecision procedure;
morale biti opredeljene predvsem za predpise Skupnosti, s katerimi se ščitijo temeljne pravice, na primer v okviru boja proti diskriminaciji in rasizmu, varstva podatkov, pravice do azila, politike priseljevanja itd. ?
the definition of such penalties should refer in particular to Community provisions relating to fundamental rights such as the campaign against discrimination and racism, data protection, right of asylum, migration policies, etc.?
Ali Komisija meni, da je treba glede na sodbo Sodišča ponovno preučiti okvirne sklepe, sprejete na podlagi člena 31 PEU (III. steber) v primerih, ko se s temi sklepi uvajajo dodatni ukrepi k predpisom, sprejetim na podlagi prava Skupnosti?
Does the Commission agree that, in the light of the Court's judgment, framework decisions based on Article 31 of the Treaty on European Union (third pillar) would have to be reviewed where such decisions constituted a measure which was supplementary to provisions adopted on the basis of Community law?
S kakšnimi ukrepi namerava Komisija preveriti dejanski vpliv kazenskih sankcij, ki so sprejete za zagotavljanje izvajanja prava Skupnosti, za evropske državljane in na splošni ravni Unije?
What measures is the Commission intending to take in order to verify the actual impact that criminal penalties imposed in order to ensure the implementation of Community law will have on both European citizens and the attainment of the objectives of the Union?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0086/05/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0086/05/rev.1
Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov je prepričan, da SOLVIT, spletno omrežje za reševanje problemov, ki ga upravlja Evropska komisija, omogoča upravno sodelovanje med državami članicami.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection is convinced that SOLVIT, the on-line problem-solving network hosted by the European Commission, facilitates administrative cooperation between Member States.
Namenjen je hitrim in praktično uporabnim rešitvam za težave, do katerih prihaja, ker javni organi napačno uporabljajo zakonodajo za notranji trg.
It is designed to find rapid and pragmatic solutions to problems which arise from the mistaken application of Internal Market legislation by public authorities.
Ali se Odbor glede na uspeh omrežja, prek katerega so v letu 2004 rešili 300 primerov in v letu 2005 pričakujejo še večji porast, strinja, da bi države članice morale nameniti več človeških in finančnih virov za omrežje SOLVIT, ki je vzajemno koristno in učinkovito orodje sodelovanja med Evropsko komisijo in nacionalnimi upravami?
Given the success of the network, which has solved as many as 300 cases in 2004, with a sharp increase expected in 2005, can the Council agree that Member States should devote greater human and financial resources to the SOLVIT network as a mutually beneficial and effective instrument of cooperation between the European Commission and national administrations?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0087/05/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0087/05/rev.1
Ali se Evropska komisija glede na uspeh omrežja, prek katerega so v letu 2004 rešili 300 primerov in v letu 2005 pričakujejo še večji porast strinja:
Given the success of the network, which has solved as many as 300 cases in 2004, with a sharp increase expected in 2005, can the European Commission agree:
da bi število zaposlenih dvignili bistveno nad štiri uradnike, ki so trenutno dodeljeni delu na omrežju?
to increase the human resource allocation substantially above the four officials currently assigned?
da bi bilo treba sistem zaradi krepitve upravnega sodelovanja nadalje razvijati?
to the system's being further developed in order to enhance administrative cooperation?
s pripravo poročila, ki bi spodbujal večjo uporabo sistema SOLVIT in s predlogom, ki bi mu dodelil potrebni status in proračunska sredstva?
to publish a report with a view to encouraging greater take-up and use of the SOLVIT system and to submit a proposal which would endow SOLVIT with the necessary status and the necessary financial resources?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0088/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0088/05
Zadeva: Strategija za preprečitev pandemije influence
Subject: Strategy against an influenza pandemic
Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija meni, da je možnost za izbruh pandemije influence zelo visoka, čeprav ni možno točno predvideti kdaj bo do izbruha prišlo.
According to WHO, the probability of an influenza pandemic outbreak is very high, even if its precise timing cannot be predicted.
Najverjetneje bo vir omenjene pandemije visoko patogeni virus ptičje gripe, ki lahko po mutaciji ali rekombinaciji z virusom človeške gripe tvori visoko infektivni virus, ki ni zajet v obstoječih cepivih in zato zahteva "novo" cepivo.
A likely source of such a pandemic would be a highly pathogenic avian flu virus which, after mutation or recombination with that of human influenza, may produce a highly infective virus which is not covered by the existing vaccines and therefore requires a 'new' one.
V primeru pandemije:
In the light of the above:
Kakšne ukrepe je Svet sprejel, da bi zaščitil javno zdravje v Skupnosti in spodbudil države članice, da nemudoma sprejmejo svoje načrte pripravljenosti?
What measures has the Council taken to protect public health in the Community and to encourage Member States to adopt their contingency plans without delay?
Kako bo Svet zagotovil takojšnjo izmenjavo informacij s sosednjimi državami?
How will the Council ensure an immediate exchange of information with neighbouring countries?
Kako lahko Svet zagotovi hitro proizvodnjo v primernih količinah in posledično pravično razdelitev novih cepiv in protivirusov?
How can the Council ensure the rapid production in adequate quantities and consequent fair distribution of new vaccines and antivirals?
Katere ukrepe predlaga Svet glede mobilnosti državljanov EU, da bi preprečili širjenje pandemije?
What measures is the Council proposing with regard to movement of EU citizens in order to prevent the pandemic from spreading?
Kako namerava Svet sodelovati z Evropskim centrom za preprečevanje in nadzor bolezni?
How does the Council intend to cooperate with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)?
Namerava Svet sprejeti celovito komunikacijsko strategijo, da bi javnosti zagotovil dostop do točnih in znanstvenih informacij, s čimer bi se izognili preplahu in zagotovili sprejetje ustreznih higienskih ukrepov?
Does the Council envisage adopting a comprehensive communication strategy so as to ensure that accurate and scientific information is available to the public, to avoid panic and to ensure that correct hygiene measures are taken?
Je Svet pripravil načrte za institucije, za primere, ko je vpletenih veliko ljudi?
Has the Council prepared plans for institutions where a large number of people work in close proximity?
Je Svet pripravil načrt ukrepov za nepredvidljive dogodke v svojih pisarnah v Bruslju?
Has the Council prepared a contingency plan for its own offices in Brussels?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0089/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0089/05
Zadeva: Strategija boja proti pandemiji influence
Subject: Strategy against an influenza pandemic
Najverjetneje bo vir omenjene pandemije visoko patogeni virus ptičje gripe, ki lahko po mutaciji ali rekombinaciji z virusom človeške gripe postane visoko infektiven virus, ki ni zajet v obstoječih cepivih in zato zahteva "novo" cepivo.
A likely source of such a pandemic would be a highly pathogenic avian flu virus which, after mutation or recombination with that of human influenza, may produce a highly infective virus which is not covered by the existing vaccines and therefore requires a 'new' one.
Kakšne ukrepe je Komisija sprejela, da bi zaščitila javno zdravje v Skupnosti?
What measures has the Commission taken to protect public health in the Community?
Katere države še niso predložile Komisiji svojih načrtov pripravljenosti?
Which countries have not yet submitted their contingency plans to the Commission?
Kateri bi bili ključni elementi in aktivni udeleženci širšega odziva Skupnosti?
What will be the key elements and who the key actors in the Community-wide response?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila takojšnjo izmenjavo informacij s sosednjimi državami?
How will the Commission ensure an immediate exchange of information with neighbouring countries?
Kako lahko Komisija zagotovi hitro proizvodnjo v primernih količinah in posledično pravično razdelitev novih cepiv in protivirusov?
How can the Commission ensure the rapid production in adequate quantities and consequent fair distribution of new vaccines and antivirals?
Katere ukrepe predlaga Komisija glede mobilnosti državljanov EU, da bi preprečili širjenje pandemije?
What measures is the Commission proposing with regard to the movement of EU citizens in order to prevent the pandemic from spreading?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti učinkovito vlogo Evropskemu centru za preprečevanje in nadzor bolezni?
How does the Commission ensure that the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) plays an effective role?
Kakšne ukrepe je Komisija sprejela, da bi povezala druge sisteme opozarjanja Skupnosti z Evropskim centrom za preprečevanje in nadzor bolezni, Svetovno zdravstveno organizacijo in drugimi mednarodnimi evropskimi mrežami in organi?
What measures has the Commission taken in order to link other Community alert systems with ECDC, WHO and other European or international networks and bodies?
Namerava Komisija sprejeti celovito komunikacijsko strategijo, da bi javnosti zagotovila dostop do točnih in znanstvenih informacij, s čimer bi se izognili preplahu in zagotovili sprejetje ustreznih higienskih ukrepov?
Does the Commission envisage adopting a comprehensive communication strategy so as to ensure that accurate and scientific information is available to the public, to avoid panic and to ensure that correct hygiene measures are taken?
Je Komisija pripravila načrte za institucije, kjer je velika koncentracija ljudi?
Has the Commission prepared plans for institutions where a large number of people work in close proximity?
Je Komisija pripravila načrt ukrepov za nepredvidljive dogodke v svojih pisarnah v Bruslju in Luksemburgu?
Has the Commission prepared a contingency plan for its own offices in Brussels and Luxembourg?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0090/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0090/05
Zadeva: Pomanjkanje inovacij in prednostna zdravila
Subject: Lack of innovation and priority medicines
Na področju novih, varnih in dostopnih zdravil obstaja velika vrzel med potrebo in oskrbo na svetovni ravni.
There exists a major gap worldwide between the need for and supply of new, safe and affordable drugs.
Katere ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela, da bi odpravila pomanjkanje inovacij?
What action will the Commission take to tackle this lack of innovation?
Kako bo Komisija vodila reševanje tega vprašanja in podprla razvoj prednostnih zdravil?
How will the Commission show leadership on this issue and support the development of priority medicines?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0091/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0091/05
Zadeva: Stanje na področju človekovih pravic v Kambodži, Laosu in Vietnamu
Subject: Human rights situation in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam
Spoštovanje človekovih pravic in demokratičnih načel je osnova vseh sporazumov o sodelovanju, podpisanih med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Kambodžo, Laosom in Vietnamom leta 1997.
Respect for human rights and democratic principles is the basis for all cooperation agreements signed in 1997 between the European Community and the countries of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam.
In vendar je Evropski parlament v zadnjih letih v številnih resolucijah obravnaval stanje na področju človekovih pravic v teh državah, na primer glede ravnanja z etnično manjšino Hmong v Laosu, verske svobode in avtohtonih manjšin v Vietnamu, ter, v zadnjem času, glede kazenskih obtožb voditeljev vladajoče koalicije proti poslancem opozicijske stranke v Kambodži.
However, the human rights situation in these three countries has been the subject of various resolutions of the European Parliament in recent years, concerning the treatment of the Hmong ethnic minority in Laos, religious freedom and indigenous minorities in Vietnam and, most recently, the criminal charges brought by the leaders of the ruling coalition against opposition party members in Cambodia.
Kakšno je stališče Sveta glede stanja na področju človekovih pravic v omenjenih državah?
What is the Council's view of the human rights situation in these countries?
Katere ukrepe je Svet že sprejel in katere še namerava sprejeti, da bi spodbudil dialog o človekovih pravicah z nacionalnimi organi?
What measures have been taken, and what measures will be taken, by the Council to promote a dialogue on human rights with the national authorities?
Kakšni rezultati so bili do sedaj doseženi na podlagi teh ukrepov glede zabeleženih kršitev človekovih pravic?
What results have been achieved to date as a result of those measures with regard to the alleged human rights violations?
Ali Svet meni, da omenjene tri države dosledno izvajajo deklaracije o spoštovanju človekovih pravic in demokratičnih načel?
Does the Council believe that the three countries are living up to their declarations that they will respect human rights and democratic principles?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0092/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0092/05
In vendar je Evropski parlament v zadnjih letih v številnih resolucijah obravnaval stanje na področju človekovih pravic v teh treh državah, na primer glede ravnanja z etnično manjšino Hmong v Laosu, verske svobode in avtohtonih manjšin v Vietnamu, ter, v zadnjem času, glede kazenskih obtožb voditeljev vladajoče koalicije proti poslancem opozicijske stranke v Kambodži.
However, the human rights situation in these three countries has been the subject of various resolutions of the European Parliament in recent years, concerning the treatment of the Hmong ethnic minority in Laos, religious freedom and indigenous minorities in Vietnam and, most recently, the criminal charges brought by the leaders of the ruling coalition against opposition party members in Cambodia.
Kakšno je stališče Komisije glede stanja na področju človekovih pravic v omenjenih državah?
What is the Commission's view of the human rights situation in these countries?
Katere ukrepe je Komisija že sprejela in katere še namerava sprejeti, da bi spodbudila dialog o človekovih pravicah z nacionalnimi organi?
What measures have been taken, and what measures will be taken, by the Commission to promote a dialogue on human rights with the national authorities?
Kakšni rezultati so bili doseženi do sedaj na podlagi omenjenih ukrepov glede zabeleženih kršitev človekovih pravic?
What results have been achieved to date as a result of those measures with regard to the alleged human rights violations?
Ali Komisija meni, da omenjene tri države dosledno izvajajo deklaracije o spoštovanju človekovih pravic in demokratičnih načel?
Does the Commission believe that the three countries are living up to their declarations that they will respect human rights and democratic principles?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0093/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0093/05
, v imenu Odbora za ustavne zadeve ,
, on behalf of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ,
, v imenu Odbora za proračun
, on behalf of the Committee on Budgets
Zadeva: Osnutek medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o skupnem okviru za evropske regulativne agencije (KOM(2005)0059 končno) postopek 2005/2035(ACI))
Subject: Draft interinstitutional agreement on the operating framework for the European regulatory agencies (COM(2005)0059 final) procedure 2005/2035(ACI))
Ali Svet namerava pričeti pogajanja s Parlamentom in Komisijo za sklenitev medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o skupnem okviru za evropske regulativne agencije na podlagi osnutka Komisije (KOM(2005)0059 končno), in če namerava, kdaj?
Is the Council intending to start negotiations - and, if so, when - with Parliament and the Commission in order to conclude an interinstitutional agreement on the operating framework for the future European regulatory agencies on the basis of the Commission's draft (COM(2005)0059 final?
Ali Svet meni, da bi morala biti ta pogajanja zaključena pred koncem finančne perspektive 2000- 2006?
Does the Council consider that such negotiations should be concluded before the end of 2000- 2006 the financial perspective?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0094/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0094/05
Zadeva: Razlogi za nezadostno izvajanje direktive o poklicnih pokojninah v državah članicah EU
Subject: Reasons for the poor implementation of the Occupational Pensions Directive by EU Member States
23. septembra 2005 je pretekel rok za uradna obvestila držav članic o izvajanju ukrepov direktive o poklicnih pokojninah.
On 23 September 2005 , the deadline expired for Member States' notification of implementing measures relating to the Directive on Occupational Pensions.
Glede na pripombe, ki ste jih navedli v svojem govoru 22. septembra v Dublinu. je samo 9 od 25 držav članic ravnalo v skladu s to določbo.
Only 9 out of 25 Member States complied with this requirement, according to remarks made by Commissioner McCreevy in his speech on 22 September in Dublin.
Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve bi rad izrazil svojo zaskrbljenost in vprašal Evropsko komisijo, kateri so razlogi za tako pomanjkljive rezultate izvajanja direktive.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs is concerned and wants to know the reasons for such a poor record of implementation.
Navedli ste, naj bi večina držav članic izvajala direktivo do konca tega leta.
Mr McCreevy indicated that most Member States are expected to implement the Directive by the end of this year.
Kako bo ukrepala Komisija v primerih tistih držav članic, ki v naslednjih mesecih morebiti ne bodo ravnale v skladu z njo ?
What action is the Commission going to take in the case of any Member States that might fail to comply in the next few months?
Kako analizirate težave, s katerimi se spopadajo države članice, ko usklajujejo svoje pokojninske sisteme z direktivo?
What is the Commission's analysis of the problems that the Member States have encountered in integrating the Directive into their pension systems?
Ali se pojavljajo težave pri oblikovanju zakonodajnega predloga, kot sta ga sprejela Evropski parlament in Svet in/ali je okvirna narava direktive privedla do različnih razlag v državah članicah?
Are there problems in the formulation of the legislative proposal as adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, and/or has the framework nature of the Directive led to different interpretations in the various Member States?
Ali že lahko navedete, v kolikšni meri so se države članice odločale za sprejemanje dodatnih, bolj podrobnih pravil o preudarnosti, še zlasti količinskih pravil in ali bi le-ta lahko predstavljala ovire za izvajanje čezmejnih določb?
Can the Commission indicate to what extent Member States have decided to adopt additional, more detailed prudential rules, notably quantitative rules, and could these create obstacles to the implementation of cross-border provisions?
Kateri drugi elementi bi lahko onemogočali izrabo vseh možnosti direktive?
Which other elements might jeopardise the attainment of the full potential of the Directive?
Kako ocenjujete dogajanja v drugem stebru pokojninskih sistemov zaradi močnega poslabšanja dohodkov iz dolgoročnega varčevanja na finančnih trgih v zadnjih letih in nujni premik k sistemom, temelječim na prispevkih namesto na ugodnostih?
What is the Commission's assessment of developments in the second pillar pension schemes resulting from the serious deterioration of long-term savings revenues in financial markets in recent years and a necessary shift towards contributions rather than benefits-based schemes?
Poleg tega pa, ali je različna obravnava shem ugodnosti v primerjavi s shemami prispevkov v službi za notranjo revizijo (IAS 19) v korist slednjih prispevala k temu premiku?
In addition, did a different treatment in IAS 19 of defined benefit schemes as opposed to defined contribution schemes in favour of the latter contribute to that shift?
Ali to ne vodi v brisanje razmejitev med drugim stebrom poklicnih pokojninskih shem in individualnih ureditev v tretjem stebru, ki jih sestavljajo dodatna vlaganja v privatnem sektorju, življenjska zavarovanja in varčevalne sheme?
Does this not lead to the blurring of borders between the second pillar occupational pension schemes and individual third pillar arrangements, which consist of private-sector based supplementary investment, life insurance and savings plans?
Končno, ob upoštevanju glavnih ciljev te direktive, ki so: da se evropski socialni sistemi osvobodijo nekaterih bremen financiranja starajoče se družbe, da se institucijam za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje (IORP) omogoči učinkovitost in likvidnost integriranega notranjega trga čezmejnega poslovanja, predvsem pa, zagotoviti evropskim državljanom finančno varnost in dostojen življenjski standard na starost; katere druge korake namerava Komisija narediti, da bi izboljšala evropske pokojninske določbe, na primer na področju napovedane a še vedno ne predstavljene Direktive o prenosljivosti pravic iz dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja, kot tudi na področju enakopravne davčne obravnave pokojninskih prispevkov?
Finally, bearing in mind that the main objective of this Directive has been to release European social systems from some of the burden of financing an ageing society, to provide the institutions for occupational retirement provisions (IORPs) with the efficiency and liquidity of an integrated internal market for cross-border business, and, above all, to ensure that European citizens enjoy financial security and a decent standard of living in old age, what other steps does the Commission intend to take in order to improve European pensions provision, such as in the field of the announced, but still not presented, Directive on the portability of supplementary pension rights, as well as in the field of equal tax treatment of pension contributions?
Direktiva 2003/41/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. junija 2003 o dejavnostih in nadzoru institucij za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje, UL, L 235 z dne 23.9.2003, str.
Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 June 2003 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision, OJ, L 235 of 23.9.2003, p.
Charlie McCreevy, "Pokojninski skladi in upravljanje s premoženjem: evropska perspektiva", GOVOR/05/539, 23.9.2005.
Charlie McCreevy, 'Pension funds and asset management: A European perspective', Speech/05/539, 23.09.2005.