natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Študije pa vendar kažejo, da se približno petina nekdanjih bolnic z rakom ne vrne na delo.
Studies show, however, that around one fifth of former cancer patients do not return to work.
Ali bi lahko Komisija, na primer z naročilom ustrezne študije, zagotovila zanesljive podatke o deležu bolnic z rakom dojke, ki se med boleznijo in zdravljenjem odpovedo zaposlitvi?
Could the Commission provide reliable information on the proportion of breast cancer patients who give up gainful employment during illness and treatment, for example by ordering a study on this subject?
Kako namerava Komisija osveščati delodajalce o tem, da morajo imeti bolniki med režimi zdravljenja možnost zaposlitve za poln ali polovični delovni čas, saj to lahko bistveno prispeva k temu, da ohranijo osebna finančna sredstva in okrepijo svoje duševno stanje?
How does the Commission intend to make employers aware of the need for patients to have the opportunity to resume full- or part-time employment while undergoing treatment regimes as this can be essential to maintain personal finances and stabilise patients' psychological condition?
Kako namerava Komisija spodbujati delodajalce k temu, da bi bolnice z rakom dojk po končanem zdravljenju ponovno vključili na trg dela, prestrukturirali njihova delovna mesta in jim ponudili prilagodljiv delovni čas?
How does the Commission intend to encourage employers to reintegrate breast cancer patients into the job market when the treatment is finished, to restructure their workplaces and to offer flexible working schedules?
Ali je po mnenju Komisije potrebno izdati posebno listino za zaščito kroničnih bolnikov na delovnem mestu, in ali bo Komisija to podprla?
Does the Commission see the need for, and will it support development of, a charter to protect the chronically ill in the workplace?
Izvajanje mamografije v skladu z evropskimi smernicami za optimalno zgodnje odkrivanje in zdravljenje zahteva predhodno specialistično usposabljanje zdravstvenega osebja.
Implementation of mammography screening according to European guidelines for optimal early detection and treatment requires special training of medical staff.
Ali namerava Komisija zlasti v novih državah članicah in državah prosilkah spodbujati uporabo socialnega sklada EU in predpristopnega sklada za usposabljanje?
Does the Commission intend, particularly in the new Member States and the applicant countries, to promote use of the EU social fund and the pre-accession fund for training?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0099/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0099/06
Zadeva: Strategija Sveta za konferenco o podnebnih spremembah v Nairobiju (COP 12 in COP/MOP 2)
Subject: Council's strategy for the Nairobi Conference on Climate Change (COP 12 and COP/MOP 2)
Ali lahko Svet pojasni svoje cilje za bližajočo se konferenco pogodbenic, ki bo od 6. do 17. novembra 2006 v Nairobiju?
Could the Council clarify its objectives for the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to be held in Nairobi on 6-17 November 2006?
Kakšna je strategija Sveta za proces z 11. konference pogodbenic v Montrealu za obravnavo nadaljnjih obveznosti po letu 2012?
What is the Council's strategy in relation to the process, set up by COP 11 in Montreal, to consider further commitments for the post-2012 period?
Kako namerava Svet vključiti poslance Evropskega parlamenta v delegacijo Skupnosti, ki bo prisostvovala tej konferenci?
How is the Council planning to involve the European Parliament Members in the Community delegation to the conference?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0100/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0100/06
Zadeva: Strategija Komisije za konferenco o podnebnih spremembah v Nairobiju (COP 12 in COP/MOP 2)
Subject: Commission's strategy for the Nairobi Conference on Climate Change (COP 12 and COP/MOP 2)
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni svoje cilje za bližajočo se konferenco pogodbenic, ki bo od 6. do 17. novembra 2006 v Nairobiju?
Could the Commission clarify its objectives for the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to be held in Nairobi on 6-17 November 2006?
Kakšna je strategija Komisije za proces z 11. konference pogodbenic v Montrealu za obravnavo nadaljnjih obveznosti po letu 2012?
What is the Commission's strategy in relation to the process, set up by COP 11 in Montreal, to consider further commitments for the post-2012 period?
Kako namerava Komisija vključiti poslance Evropskega parlamenta v delegacijo Skupnosti, ki bo prisostvovala tej konferenci?
How is the Commission planning to involve the European Parliament Members in the Community delegation to the conference?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0101/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0101/06
Zadeva: Razmere na področju zgodnjega odkrivanja in zdravljenja raka dojke v razširjeni Evropski uniji
Subject: Early detection and treatment of breast cancer in the enlarged European Union
Ker je v Evropski uniji rak dojke glavni vzrok za smrt žensk med 35. in 59. letom starosti, ker se stopnja umrljivosti zaradi raka dojke med državami članicami razlikuje tudi za več kot 50 %, ker se število mastektomij pri zgodnjem raku dojke med državami članicami razlikuje do 60 %, ker je le 10 od 25 držav članic Evropske unije uvedlo organizirane vsedržavne programe mamografije in ker celo še manj držav članic v celoti izvaja smernice EU za odkrivanje raka dojke, Evropski parlament zahteva, naj mu Komisija posreduje naslednje informacije:
Given that breast cancer is the leading cause of death in women aged between 35 and 59 in the EU, breast cancer mortality rates vary between Member States by over 50%, rates of mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer differ between Member States by up to 60%, only 10 of the 25 EU Member States have implemented organised, nationwide mammography screening programmes, and even fewer Member States have fully implemented the EU guidelines on breast cancer screening, the Commission is requested to provide the European Parliament with the following information:
Ali je Komisija pripravljena ukreniti vse potrebno, da bi pridobila najnovejše in natančne podatke o pojavu, zgodnjem odkrivanju in zdravljenju raka dojke pri ženskah in moških v vseh državah članicah razširjene Evropske unije?
Is the Commission willing to take all necessary steps to obtain current and accurate data on the incidence, early detection and treatment of breast cancer in women and men in all Member States of the enlarged European Union?
Kdaj bodo ti podatki na voljo?
When will this information be available?
Kako bo Komisija v sedmem okvirnem programu upoštevala vse bolj prisotno zavest, da k razvoju raka dojke poleg genetskih dejavnikov prispevajo tudi okoljski dejavniki in življenjski slog?
How will the Commission take into account in the Seventh Framework Programme the increasing awareness that, in addition to genetic factors, environmental factors and lifestyle also promote development of breast cancer?
Na kakšen način bo v sedmem okvirnem programu upoštevano, da so potrebne raziskave, ki bi izboljšale standarde in protokole za zagotovitev kakovostnih preiskav raka dojke, zlasti glede tehnično-fizičnih vidikov ter alternativ klasični mamografiji, npr. digitalna mamografija?
How will the need for research to improve standards and protocols for quality assurance in breast cancer screening, particularly technico-physical aspects and alternatives to conventional mammography, such as digital mammography, be taken into account in the Seventh Framework Programme?
Na kakšen način namerava Komisija uporabiti primerjalno analizo in načela najboljše prakse, da bi vplivala na države članice, ki so pri uveljavljanju Priporočila Sveta o zgodnjem odkrivanju raka z dne 2. decembra 2003 in pri sledenju smernicam EU, namenjenih specialističnim enotam za bolezni dojk, dosegle le skromen napredek ali sploh nikakršnega?
How does the Commission intend to use benchmarking and 'best practice' principles to influence the Member States which have made little or no progress in implementing the Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening of 2 December 2003 and in following the EU guidelines on specialist breast units?
Katere ukrepe je pri razvoju sedmega okvirnega programa Komisija že sprejela, da bi zagotovila financiranje raziskav za razvoj testa na osnovi seruma za odkrivanje zgodnjega raka dojke („test biomarker “)?
What steps has the Commission taken in drawing up the Seventh Framework Programme to provide research funding to develop a serum-based test for early breast cancer detection (biomarker test)?
Ali je Komisija res prepričana, da je v današnjem času sodobnih komunikacij preprosteje, če si zdravniki in skupine bolnikov v vseh državah članicah EU naročajo natisnjene različice smernic EU, kot da bi bil dokument za branje in prenos na voljo na internetu?
Is the Commission convinced that in the current age of modern communication it is more practical for physicians and patient groups in all EU Member States to order printed versions of the EU guidelines rather than to have the document available on the Internet for reading and downloading?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0102/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0102/06
Zadeva: Evropska unija in tretja revizijska konferenca konvencije ZN o konvencionalnem orožju leta 2006
Subject: The European Union and the 2006 Third Review Conference on the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons
V Ženevi se bo od 7. do 17. novembra 2006 odvijala tretja revizijska konferenca Konvencije o prepovedi določenih vrst konvencionalnega orožja (CCW).
The Third Review Conference on the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) will be held in Geneva during the period from 7 to 17 November 2006.
Države članice Evropske unije so podpisnice nekaterih protokolov iz Konvencije o prepovedi določenih vrst konvencionalnega orožja (CCW), Evropska unija tudi dejavno podpira ukrepe zoper protipehotne mine in nudi pomoč pri odstranjevanju min.
EU Member States are signatories to some of the protocols of the CCW, and the EU has actively supported actions against anti-personnel landmines and provided assistance for mine clearance.
Kakšne izide pričakuje Svet od tretje revizijske konference Konvencije o prepovedi določenih vrst konvencionalnega orožja (CCW)?
What outcome to the Third Review Conference on CCW does the Council expect?
Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti, da bodo države članice Evropske unije ratificirale Protokol V o eksplozivnih ostankih vojne?
What is the Council doing to ensure that EU Member States ratify Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War?
Ali Svet podpira prizadevanja, da bi uvedli nov protokol o kasetnem strelivu?
Does the Council support efforts to introduce a new protocol dealing with cluster munitions?
Ali je Svet uvedel ali priporočil kakršne koli zakonodajne ukrepe, ki bi zagotavljali, da države članice med sedanjimi in bodočimi vojaškimi operacijami EVOP ne bodo uporabljale nobenega tipa kasetnega streliva?
Has the Council introduced or recommended any legislative measures to ensure that Member States do not use any type of cluster munitions during current and future ESDP military operations?
Ali Svet podpira prizadevanja za vsesplošno uporabo Konvencije o prepovedi določenih vrst konvencionalnega orožja (CCW)?
Does the Council support efforts to universalise the CCW?
Če jih, na kakšen način skuša doseči ta cilj?
If so, how is it trying to achieve this aim?
Ali Svet podpira prizadevanja, da bi v izvajanje Konvencije o prepovedi določenih vrst konvencionalnega orožja (CCW) vključili mehanizem skladnosti?
Does the Council support efforts to introduce compliance mechanisms for the implementation of the CCW?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0103/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0103/06
Kako Komisija podpira ukrepe proti eksplozivnim ostankom vojne?
What is the Commission doing to support actions against Explosive Remnants of War?
Namerava Komisija razširiti strategijo za odstranjevanje min in vanjo vključiti eksplozivne ostanke vojne?
Would the Commission envisage expanding its Mine Action Strategy to include Explosive Remnants of War?
Če je tako, ali bo ta finančna podpora dodatek že obstoječemu financiranju odstranjevanja min ali jo bo treba odšteti od obstoječih sredstev?
If so, would such financial support be in addition to current financing for Mine Action or would it be subtracted from existing funds?
S kakšnimi ukrepi namerava Komisija poskrbeti, da se bo strategija za odstranjevanje min in eksplozivnih ostankov vojne vključila v druge finančne instrumente s področja zunanjih odnosov?
What steps is the Commission taking to ensure that Mine Actions and Explosive Remnants of War are ‘mainstreamed’ into the other external relations financial instruments?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0104/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0104/06
Zadeva: Evropska unija in revizijska konferenca Konvencije o biološkem in toksičnem orožju (BTWC) leta 2006
Subject: The European Union and the 2006 Review Conference on the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention
Šesta revizijska konferenca Konvencije o biološkem in toksičnem orožju iz leta 1972 (BTWC) bo potekala v Ženevi od 20. novembra do 8. decembra 2006.
The Sixth Review Conference of the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) will be held in Geneva from 20 November to 8 December 2006.
Evropska unija je 27. februarja 2006 dosegla soglasje o Skupnem ukrepu v zvezi z BTWC, 20. marca 2006 pa je Svet EU sprejel Skupno stališče o revizijski konferenci Konvencije o biološkem in toksičnem orožju (BTWC) leta 2006.
On 27 February 2006, the EU agreed on a Joint Action in respect of the BTWC and on 20 March 2006 the EU Council adopted a common position relating to the 2006 Review Conference of the BTWC.
Ob upoštevanju teh sklepov:
In the light of these decisions:
Kaj namerava Svet storiti, da bi zagotovil uspešen izid revizijske konference Konvencije o biološkem in toksičnem orožju (BTWC) leta 2006?
what does the Council intend to do to ensure the successful outcome of the 2006 BTWC Review Conference?
Kako bi lahko po mnenju Sveta praktično izboljšali Konvencijo o biološkem in toksičnem orožju (BTWC)?
in which practical ways does the Council believe that the BTWC could be improved?
Katere pobude Sveta in držav članic ob pripravah na revizijsko konferenco vključujejo tretje države in kje bodo te pobude po pričakovanjih Sveta v Ženevi pripeljale do konkretnih izidov?
what initiatives have the Council and Member States undertaken with third countries in preparation for the Review Conference, and does the Council expect these initiatives to have substantial outcomes in Geneva?
Na katerih področjih je delovna skupina za razorožitev in nadzor nad orožjem (CODUN) obravnavala delovne dokumente ob pripravi na revizijsko konferenco in ali bodo na revizijski konferenci ti dokumenti predloženi kot dokumenti, ki predstavljajo stališče EU?
in which areas has CODUN discussed working papers in preparation for the Review Conference and will these papers be submitted as EU position papers for the Review Conference?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0105/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0105/06
Konvencija o biološkem in toksičnem orožju (BTWC) od držav članic zahteva izvajanje nacionalne zakonodaje.
The BTWC requires Member States to implement national legislation.
Ali je Komisija preverila, če so države članice uvedle nacionalno zakonodajo, skladno s Konvencijo o biološkem in toksičnem orožju (BTWC)?
has the Commission examined whether Member States have introduced national legislation to comply with the BTWC?
Komisija trenutno pripravlja sporočilo o stanju pripravljenosti EU ob grožnjah biološkega terorizma in zeleno knjigo o splošnem odkrivanju bioloških nevarnosti.
is the Commission currently preparing a Communication on the state of EU preparedness against the bio-terrorist threat, as well as a Green Paper on the general detection of biological risks.
Kakšna je povezava med tema pobudama in nacionalnimi strategijami, ki so jih razvile države članice za izpolnjevanje obveznosti iz Konvencije o biološkem in toksičnem orožju (BTWC)?
How do these initiatives relate to national strategies developed by Member States to implement their commitments to the BTWC?
Kakšen je prispevek Komisije k pobudi G8 za globalno partnerstvo na področju biološke varnosti?
how is the Commission contributing to the G8 Global Partnership initiative in the area of bio-security?
Ali so na tem področju že sprejeti programi?
Have programmes been adopted in this area?
Če so programi že sprejeti, kakšna je sedanja in prihodnja raven finančnih obveznosti v teh programih?
If such programmes have been adopted, what are the current and future levels of financial commitment to such programmes?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0106/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0106/06
Zadeva: Vključitev ukrepa za vrnitev območja Varosha njegovim zakonitim prebivalcem med celovite ukrepe za odpravo osamitve skupnosti ciprskih Turkov
Subject: Incorporation of the return of Varosha to its lawful inhabitants into the comprehensive measures to end the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community
Odločitev o vložitvi vprašanja za ustni odgovor v zvezi z vključitvijo ukrepa o vrnitvi zaprtega območja Famagusta (Varosha) njegovim zakonitim prebivalcem med celovite ukrepe za odpravo osamitve skupnosti ciprskih Turkov, ki jih je Komisija sama predlagala, je bila sprejeta po obravnavi peticije 733/2004 v Odboru za peticije.
The decision to submit an oral question on the incorporation of return of the sealed-off section of Famagusta (Varosha) to its lawful inhabitants into the comprehensive measures proposed by the European Commission in order to end the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community was taken after the deliberations in the Committee on Petitions on petition 733/2004.
V obrazložitvenem memorandumu k predlogu uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi instrumenta finančne podpore za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja skupnosti ciprskih Turkov, enem od štirih dokumentov, ki vsebujejo celovite ukrepe za odpravo osamitve skupnosti ciprskih Turkov, je zapisano, da je "cilj sedanjega paketa omogočiti ponovno združitev Cipra s spodbujanjem gospodarskega in socialnega razvoja, pri čemer je posebej poudarjena gospodarska povezava otoka na podlagi uskladitve s pravnim redom Skupnosti in z izboljšanjem stikov med obema skupnostma ter z Evropsko unijo."
In the explanatory memorandum attached to the proposal for a Council regulation establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community, which is one of the four documents presenting the comprehensive measures to end the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot Community, it is stated that 'the present package is aiming at facilitating the reunification of Cyprus by encouraging the economic and social development with particular emphasis on the economic integration of the island, through alignment with the acquis, and by improving contacts between the two communities and with the EU.'
Svet za splošne zadeve je v sklepu z dne 27. februarja 2006 sklenil Komisijo pozvati, naj nadaljuje s prizadevanji za neposredna pogajanja v prid skupnosti ciprskih Turkov na podlagi pogajanj iz obdobja luksemburškega predsedstva, ko so potekale razprave o zaprtem območju Famagusta (Varosha) in pristanišču ter o urejanju proste trgovine.
In its decision of 27 February 2006, the General Affairs Council decided to ask the Commission to pursue further the efforts for direct trade to the benefit of the Turkish Cypriot community on the basis of the negotiations which took place under the Luxembourg Presidency when the issue of the sealed-off area of Famagusta (Varosha) and the port were placed on the agenda along with the free trade regulation.
Kako namerava Komisija ukrepati glede na omenjeno odločitev, da bo zaprto območje Famagusta vrnjeno zakonitim prebivalcem?
How does the Commission intend to proceed, in accordance with the above mentioned decision, to ensure that the sealed-off area of Famagusta can be returned to its lawful inhabitants?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0107/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0107/06
Zadeva: Priznavanje diplom severnega Cipra
Subject: Recognition of diplomas from northern Cyprus
Svet je 26. aprila 2004 po negativnem izidu referendumov v Republiki Ciper 24. aprila 2004 in posledično neuspeli pridružitvi združenega Cipra k Evropski uniji izrazil željo, da prebivalcem Cipra kmalu zagotovi, da postanejo državljani združenega Cipra v Evropski uniji" ter svojo odločenost, da konča osamitev turške skupnosti na Cipru.
Following the negative outcome of the referenda in the Republic of Cyprus on 24 April 2004, and the resulting failure to secure the accession to the European Union of a united Cyprus, the Council expressed on 26 April 2004 its strong desire to ‘ensure that the people of Cyprus will soon achieve their shared destiny as citizens of a united Cyprus in the European Union’ and its determination to put an end to the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community.
Dve leti po tej izjavi so razmere za turško skupnost na Cipru še vedno kritične.
Two years after this declaration the situation remains critical for the Turkish Cypriot community.
Koristi t.i. sporazuma o zeleni črti so omejene; trgovina in gospodarska menjava med obema deloma komaj obstaja, ker je Svet blokiral sporazum, ki bi olajšal trgovino.
The benefits of the so called Green Line agreement are limited, and trade and economic exchange over the line hardly exist as a trade facilitation agreement remains blocked in Council.
Finančna pomoč v višini skupno 139 milijonov eurov za leto 2006, ki je bila končno odobrena 27. februarja 2006, je namenjena infrastrukturnim projektom.
The financial aid package, finally adopted on 27 February 2006, with a total of € 139 million for 2006, will focus on infrastructure projects.
Vsekakor potrebni infrastrukturni projekti, ki jih sponzorira EU, ne morejo odpraviti osamitve in globokega razočaranja turške skupnosti na Cipru, vendar pa bi jih morali dopolniti finančna prizadevanja EU za izboljšanje odnosov med obema skupnostma in konkretni ukrepi za končanje osamitve severnega Cipra.
However, the isolation and deep disappointment felt by the Turkish Cypriot community can hardly be cured by however necessary EU-sponsored infrastructure projects, but should be complemented by EU-financed efforts to increase people-to-people contacts between the two communities and concrete measures to end the isolation of the north.
Ukrepi bi morali biti zlasti namenjeni mladim in študentom, ki so podpirali politične spremembe v severnem delu Cipra, vendar do sedaj niso dobili nobenega zunanjega potrdila za njihov novi pristop.
Such measures should especially target young people and students, who supported the political changes that have taken place in northern Cyprus, but so far have seen no external recognition of their new approach.
Ali ima Svet s tem v zvezi kakršne koli načrte za sprejem konkretnih ukrepov, ki bi povečali sodelovanje izobraževalnih institucij severnega Cipra v EU in evropskih strukturah, kot je bolonjski proces, in pomenili začetek procesa priznavanja diplom univerz in izobraževalnih institucij iz severnega dela Cipra?
In this context, does the Council have any plans to take concrete measures to increase the cooperation of educational institutions in northern Cyprus in EU and Europe-wide structures, such as the Bologna process and to commence a process of recognition of diplomas from northern Cypriot universities and educational institutions?
Katere dopolnilne ukrepe je Svet preučil kot potrebne za dosego cilja Sveta „končanje osamitve severnega dela in pomoč pri iskanju celovite rešitve za razdelitev otoka“?
What supplementary measures has the Council identified as a means of reaching its objective of ‘putting an end to the isolation of the north and facilitating a comprehensive settlement of the division of the island’?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0108/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0108/06