natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali je legitimno državam članicam dovoliti, da osebe vračajo, ne da bi v predvidenem roku prejele odgovor tretjih držav na vlogo za ponovni sprejem njihovih državljanov, državljanov tretjih držav, ki so bili v teh državah v tranzitu, ali oseb brez državljanstva?
Is it legitimate to authorise the Member States to carry out repatriations in the absence of a reply from the third country within the set time limit to a request for readmission of one of its nationals, a third-country national who has transited through the country, or a stateless person?
Naj ne bi ti sporazumi morali izrecno določati pomoč ob reintegraciji ponovno sprejetih oseb?
Should the agreements not make explicit mention of assistance with reintegration for those who are readmitted?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0105/2010
Question for oral answer O-0105/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Sporazum o prosti trgovini med EU in Južno Korejo
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement
Sporazum o prosti trgovini med EU in Južno Korejo je bil sklenjen 15. oktobra 2009 po dveh letih in pol pogajanj.
The EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA) was agreed on 15 October 2009 after two and a half years of negotiations.
Evropski parlament mora jeseni potrditi končni dogovor, ki naj bi, v skladu z napovedmi Evropske komisije, ustvaril precej nove menjave blaga in storitev v vrednosti 19,1 milijarde evrov za EU in 12,8 milijard evrov za Korejo.
The European Parliament has yet to approve the final deal in the autumn, which is expected to create substantial new trade in goods and services of €19.1 billion for the EU compared to €12.8 billion for Korea, according to European Commission forecasts.
Vendar pa je delovno intenzivna avtomobilska in tekstilna industrija zaskrbljena zaradi učinkov, ki bi jih lahko imel uvoz poceni tujih izdelkov iz korejskih podjetij.
However, the employment-intensive automotive and textile industries are worried about what effects cheap foreign imports from Korean firms could have.
Kakšno je stališče Sveta glede opozorila Evropskega združenja proizvajalcev avtomobilov, v skladu s katerim bi lahko izgubili 30.000 delovnih mest v proizvodnji in zaprli 10 obratov v Evropi?
What is the Council's view regarding the warning of the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, according to which 30 000 manufacturing jobs could be lost and 10 plants closed across Europe?
Kakšne pogovore je imel Svet z državami članicami, zlasti s tistimi, ki so glede zaposlovanja odvisne od avtomobilske in tekstilne industrije, o morebitnem vplivu na zaposlovanje v teh sektorjih, in kakšna strukturna pomoč bo na voljo za kompenzacijo izgubljenih delovnih mest?
What discussions has the Council held with the Member States, particularly those which rely upon the automotive and textile industries for employment, about the potential employment impact in those sectors and what structural assistance will be made available to compensate for job losses?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0106/2010
Question for oral answer O-0106/2010
Ali je Komisija izvedla natančno oceno učinka vplivov, ki jih bo imel sporazuma o prosti trgovini med EU in Južno Korejo v njegovi trenutni obliki na zaposlovanje v avtomobilskem in tekstilnem sektorju EU?
Has the Commission conducted an in-depth impact assessment of the employment implications in the EU automotive and textile sectors of an EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement as currently drafted?
Če je, kakšni so zaključki in kakšno je stališče Komisije glede opozorila Evropskega združenja proizvajalcev avtomobilov, v skladu s katerim bi lahko izgubili 30.000 delovnih mest v proizvodnji in zaprli 10 obratov v Evropi?
If so, what are the conclusions and what is the Commission's view regarding the warning of the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, according to which 30 000 manufacturing jobs could be lost and 10 plants closed across Europe?
Kakšne pogovore je imela Komisija z državami članicami, zlasti s tistimi, ki so glede zaposlovanja odvisne od avtomobilske in tekstilne industrije, o morebitnem vplivu na zaposlovanje v teh sektorjih, in kakšna strukturna pomoč bo na voljo za kompenzacijo izgubljenih delovnih mest?
What discussions has the Commission held with the Member States, particularly those which rely upon the automotive and textile industries for employment, about the potential employment impact in those sectors and what structural assistance will be made available to compensate for job losses?
Kakšni so argumenti Komisije za privolitev v določbo povračila dajatve, ki bo Južni Koreji dovoljevala, da bo pridobila do 45 % sestavnih delov za končne izdelke drugje v Aziji, in bo tako ponudila nižje stroške v primerjavi z evropskimi proizvajalci?
What is the Commission's rationale for agreeing to a duty drawback provision which will allow South Korea to source up to 45% of a finished product's components elsewhere in Asia, therefore providing a cost advantage over European-based manufacturers?
Na kakšen način bo Komisija, glede na to, da je Južna Koreja znana po tem, da vzpostavlja nove in inovativne necarinske ovire, da bi zaščitila svoj trg, zagotovila, da Južna Koreja po začetku veljave tega sporazuma o prosti trgovini ne bo vpeljala teh novih necarinskih ovir?
Given that South Korea is known for erecting new and innovative non-tariff barriers to protect its market, how will the Commission ensure that new non-tariff barriers will not be introduced in South Korea after the entry into force of this Free Trade Agreement?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0107/2010
Question for oral answer O-0107/2010
v imenu Odbora za razvoj Zadeva: Prispevek biotske raznovrstnosti in njenih ekosistemskih storitev k razvoju in uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja
on behalf of the Committee on Development Subject: Contribution of biodiversity and its ecosystem services to development and the achievement of the MDGs
Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov je leto 2010 razglasila za mednarodno leto biotske raznovrstnosti.
The UN General Assembly has declared 2010 the International Year of Biodiversity.
Prav tako je tema mednarodnega dneva biotske raznovrstnosti za leto 2010 „biotska raznovrstnost za razvoj in zmanjšanje revščine“.
Also, the theme of the International Day for Biological Diversity in 2010 is Biodiversity for Development and Poverty Alleviation.
Ključna razsežnost načrta o razvojnih ciljih tisočletja je obračanje trenda upadanja biotske raznovrstnosti, ki prispeva k napredku v zvezi z nekaterimi ključnimi cilji razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, kot so odprava skrajne revščine in lakote, zagotavljanje zdravja in izobraževanja za vse ter uresničevanje okoljske trajnosti.
Reversing biodiversity loss is a key dimension of the MDG agenda, which contributes to progress on some of the key MDG goals such as ending extreme poverty and hunger, ensuring health and education for all, and achieving environmental sustainability.
Kakšni bodo politični odzivi Sveta na desetem srečanju konference pogodbenic konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti (COP 10) v Nagoji glede obravnavanja izgube biotske raznovrstnosti kot novega izziva pri zmanjševanju revščine?
What are the policy responses of the Council with a view to addressing, at the Tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 10) in Nagoya, the loss of biodiversity as a new challenge to alleviate poverty?
Zlasti pa, kako namerava finančno in tehnično obravnavati potrebe najmanj razvitih držav?
In particular, how does it plan to address, both financially and technically, the needs of the least developed countries?
Ali namerava Svet v tem okviru prilagoditi specifične cilje za instrument za razvojno sodelovanje in evropski razvojni sklad?
In this context, does the Council intend to adapt the DCI and EDF specific objectives to this topic?
Katere konkretne ukrepe in katero kombinacijo politik namerava Svet spodbujati v zvezi s skladnostjo politik za razvoj za zagotovitev, da bo varstvo biotske raznovrstnosti prispevalo k zmanjšanju revščine?
In relation to policy coherence for development, what concrete measures and what policy mix does the Council intend to promote to ensure that the protection of biodiversity contributes to poverty reduction?
Katere politične odgovore je Svet pripravil, da bi zagotovil vključevanje biotske raznovrstnosti v dejavnosti gospodarskega sektorja, skupaj s kmetijstvom, gozdarstvom, ribištvom in turizmom?
What policy responses has the Council envisaged to ensure the mainstreaming of biodiversity into economic sectoral activities, including agriculture, forestry, fisheries and tourism?
In končno, katere mehanizme namerava Svet podpreti na desetem srečanju konference pogodbenic konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti COP 10, da bi zagotovil spoštovanje pravic iz aarhuške konvencije ter pravic revnih ter da bodo ti vključeni v postopek posvetovanja, obenem pa zagotovil pravično delitev koristi, ki izhajajo iz genskih virov in ekosistemskih storitev?
Finally, what kind of mechanisms does the Council plan to support at the COP-10 to safeguard the rights enshrined in the Aarhus Convention and ensure that the rights of the poor are respected and that they are involved in the consultation process, while ensuring an equitable sharing of the benefits arising from genetic resources and ecosystem services?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0108/2010
Question for oral answer O-0108/2010
Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov je leto 2010 razglasila za mednarodno leto biotske raznovrstnosti.
The United Nations General Assembly has declared 2010 the International Year of Biodiversity.
Prav tako je tema svetovnega dneva biotske raznovrstnosti za leto 2010 „biotska raznovrstnost za razvoj in zmanjšanje revščine“.
Also, the theme of the International Day for Biological Diversity in 2010 is biodiversity, development and poverty alleviation.
Ključna razsežnost načrta o razvojnih ciljih tisočletja je obračanje trenda upadanja biotske raznovrstnosti, ki prispeva k napredku v zvezi z nekaterimi ključnimi cilji razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, kot so odprava skrajne revščine in lakote, zagotavljanje zdravja in izobraževanja za vse ter uresničevanje okoljske trajnosti.
Reversing biodiversity loss is a key dimension of the MDG agenda and that contributes to progress on some of the key MDG goals such as ending extreme poverty and hunger, ensuring health and education for all and achieving environmental sustainability.
Kakšni bodo politični odzivi Komisije na desetem srečanju konference pogodbenic konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti (COP 10) v Nagoji glede obravnavanja izgube biotske raznovrstnosti kot novega izziva pri zmanjševanju revščine?
What are the Commission’s policy responses to address, at the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 10) in Nagoya, the loss of biodiversity as a new challenge to alleviation of poverty?
Ali namerava Komisija v tem okviru prilagoditi specifične cilje za instrument za razvojno sodelovanje in evropski razvojni sklad?
In this context does the Commission intend to adapt the DCI- and EDF-specific objectives to this topic?
Katero stališče bo Komisija zavzela v pogajanjih o osnutku protokola o dostopu do genskih virov in porazdelitvi koristi?
What stance will the Commission take on the negotiation on the draft protocol on access and benefit sharing (ABS)?
Katere konkretne ukrepe in katero kombinacijo politik namerava Komisija spodbujati v zvezi s skladnostjo politik za razvoj za zagotovitev, da bo varstvo biotske raznovrstnosti prispevalo k zmanjšanju revščine?
In relation to policy coherence for development, what concrete measures and what policy mix does the Commission intend to promote to ensure that the protection of biodiversity contributes to poverty reduction?
Katere politične odgovore je Komisija pripravila, da bi zagotovila vključevanje biotske raznovrstnosti v dejavnosti gospodarskega sektorja, skupaj s kmetijstvom, gozdarstvom, ribištvom in turizmom?
What policy responses has the Commission envisaged to ensure the mainstreaming of biodiversity into economic sector activities, including agriculture, forestry, fisheries and tourism?
In končno, katere mehanizme namerava Komisija podpreti na desetem srečanju konference pogodbenic konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti COP 10, da bi zagotovila spoštovanje pravic iz aarhuške konvencije ter pravic revnih ter da bodo ti vključeni v postopek posvetovanja, obenem pa zagotovila pravično delitev koristi, ki izhajajo iz genskih virov in ekosistemskih storitev?
Finally, what kind of mechanisms does the Commission plan to support at the COP 10 to ensure those rights contained in the Aarhus Convention and that the rights of the poor are respected and that they are involved in the consultation process, while ensuring an equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources and ecosystem services?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0109/2010
Question for oral answer O-0109/2010
v imenu Odbora za regionalni razvoj Zadeva: Stanovanjska politika in politika razvoja mest
on behalf of the Committee on Regional Development Subject: Housing and urban development policies
Neformalno srečanje ministrov za stanovanja in razvoj mest je potekalo 21. in 22. junija 2010 v Toledu.
An informal meeting of the Ministers of Housing and Urban Development was held on 21 and 22 June 2010 in Toledo.
Ministri EU so v svojih dveh izjavah potrdili tesno povezavo med stanovanjskimi in urbanističnimi politikami držav članic ter politikami EU o socialni in teritorialni koheziji, zlasti pa pomen politik za boj proti socialni izključenosti, revščini in podnebnim spremembam.
The EU Ministers confirmed in their two declarations the close link between the urban and housing policies of the Member States and the EU policies on social and territorial cohesion, and, in particular, the importance of policies to combat social exclusion, poverty and climate change.
Ker 74 % prebivalcev EU živi v mestih, je pomembno, da se v nacionalnih politikah in v politikah EU bolje upoštevajo potrebe mest.
Since 74% of the EU population lives in cities, it is important to take greater account of the needs of the cities in national and EU policies.
Izzive, povezane s podnebnimi spremembami ter z gospodarsko in finančno krizo, bi lahko uspešno rešili samo s sodelovanjem evropskih mest.
It is only with the involvement of Europe's cities that the challenges of climate change and the economic and financial crisis can be successfully addressed.
Na kakšen način nameravajo države članice sodelovati pri oblikovanju urbanistične politike na ravni EU in pri izvajanju celostne strategije za razvoj mest?
How do the Member States intend to cooperate in drafting an urban policy at EU level and implementing an integrated strategy for urban development?
Kot je navedeno v sklepih srečanja iz Toleda, je aktivna podpora držav članic in Komisije za ambiciozno politiko o energetski učinkovitosti bistvena za doseganje ciljev 20-20-20.
As indicated in the conclusions of the Toledo meeting, the active support of the Member States and the Commission for an ambitious energy efficiency policy is essential in order to meet the 20-20-20 targets.
Vendar pa se zaenkrat v ta namen premalo uporabljajo strukturni skladi.
However, at present, insufficient use is being made of the Structural Funds for this purpose.
Na kakšen način nameravajo države članice prispevati k izvajanju nove direktive o energetski učinkovitosti stavb in spodbujati uporabo strukturnih skladov za energetske ukrepe, zlasti v mestih?
How do the Member States intend to contribute to the implementation of the new Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings (EPBD) and to promote the use of structural funding for energy measures, particularly in cities?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0110/2010
Question for oral answer O-0110/2010
v imenu Odbora za regionalni razvoj Zadeva: Kohezijska in regionalna politika EU po letu 2013
on behalf of the Committee on Regional Development Subject: EU cohesion and regional policy after 2013
Ali lahko Komisija opiše svoja stališča o kohezijski politiki po letu 2013, skupaj s cilji, prednostnimi nalogami in strukturo politike?
Could the Commission outline its views on cohesion policy after 2013, including the policy's objectives, priorities and architecture?
Ali lahko pripravi oceno finančnih sredstev, potrebnih za izvajanje učinkovite in uspešne kohezijske politike, ki bi prispevala k premišljeni in trajnostni rasti evropskega gospodarstva in bi zagotovila, da politika ostane verodostojna po vsej Uniji?
Could it provide an assessment of the financial resources required in order to conduct an efficient and effective cohesion policy contributing to smart and sustainable growth in the European economy and to ensure that the policy remains credible throughout the Union?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0111/2010
Question for oral answer O-0111/2010
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Glavni cilji konference pogodbenic Konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti, ki bo od 18. do 29. oktobra 2010 v Nagoji
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: Key objectives for the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity in Nagoya, 18-29 October 2010
Ali lahko Svet obrazloži glavne strateške cilje Evropske unije za bližnjo konferenco pogodbenic Konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti, ki bo v Nagoji (Japonska) od 18. do 29. oktobra 2010?
Can the Council explain the key strategic objectives for the European Union at the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity that will be held in Nagoya (Japan) from 18 to 29 October 2010?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0112/2010
Question for oral answer O-0112/2010
Ali lahko Komisija obrazloži glavne strateške cilje Evropske unije za bližnjo konferenco pogodbenic Konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti, ki bo v Nagoji (Japonska) od 18. do 29. oktobra 2010?
Can the Commission explain the key strategic objectives for the European Union at the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity that will be held in Nagoya (Japan) from 18 to 29 October 2010?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0113/2010
Question for oral answer O-0113/2010
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Novi evropski okvir za otoke v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: A new European framework for islands under the Lisbon Treaty
V skladu s členom 174 pogodbe je treba v evropske instrumente in politike vključiti nove posebne ukrepe, da bi prebivalcem evropskih otoških regij omogočili, da bi na pravičen način uživali temeljne svoboščine iz pogodbe.
Pursuant to Article 174 of the Treaty new specific measures should be included in European instruments and policies to allow inhabitants of European island regions to benefit in an equitable way from the basic freedoms set out in the Treaty.
S približevanjem cilju teritorialne kohezije bi morali ti ukrepi otokom omogočiti, da bi odpravili svoje pomanjkljivosti in tudi izkoristili svoje možnosti v zvezi z njihovim posebnim položajem.
By moving towards the territorial cohesion objective, these measures should permit islands not only to overcome their handicaps but also to exploit the potentials related to their particular situation.
Evropski otoki imajo nekaj skupnih značilnosti (omejeno ozemlje, slabša dostopnost, bogati, a krhki ekosistemi, omejena razpoložljivost virov), po katerih se razlikujejo od celine in ki vplivajo na njihov razvoj.
European islands share some features (limited territory, reduced accessibility, rich but fragile ecosystems, limited availability of resources) that differentiate them from the mainland, having an impact on their development.
Zato je potreben poseben okvir EU (pravni, politični, finančni), ki bo politikam EU omogočil posredovanje v zvezi z otoki in ohranil ustrezno prožnost za odzivanje na njihove razvojne potrebe glede na posamezne primere, vedno v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti.
For this reason a specific EU framework (legal, political, financial) is needed to allow EU policies to intervene in relation to islands, keeping sufficient flexibility to respond on a case-by-case basis to their development needs, always in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
V okviru sedanje regionalne politike nekatere evropske otoške regije zaradi meril o oddaljenosti, in sicer razdalje največ 150 km med obmejnimi pomorskimi regijami, niso upravičene do evropskega financiranja po programih čezmejnega sodelovanja.
In the framework of the present regional policy, some European island regions, due to the distance-related criteria of a maximum separation of 150 km between maritime border regions, are not eligible for European financing under the cross-border cooperation programmes.
Takšna omejitev zmanjšuje možnosti otoških regij za medsebojno sodelovanje ali sodelovanje z drugimi morskimi regijami, ki imajo podobne težave in potrebe.
Such a limitation reduces the chances for island regions to cooperate among themselves or with other maritime regions which share some problems and needs.
Ali Komisija namerava spodbujati poseben okvir za otoke, da bo lahko kohezijska politika, skupaj z drugimi ustreznimi evropskimi politikami s pomembnim teritorialnim vidikom, igrala pomembno vlogo, ki ji je bila določena kot glavnemu evropskemu instrumentu za spodbujanje razvoja vseh regij EU?
Does the Commission intend to push forward a specific framework for islands so that Cohesion Policy, together with other relevant European policies with an important territorial impact, can play the crucial role it has been assigned as the main European instrument to promote the development of all EU regions?
Utemeljitev tega okvira bi morala biti osnovana na bolj statističnih dokazih.
The justification of this framework should be based on more statistical evidence.
BDP in stopnje brezposelnosti, ki so se doslej uporabljale kot merila upravičenosti, se ne zdijo zadostni, da bi pokazali razmere otokov glede na celino.
GDP and unemployment rates, used until now as eligibility criteria, seem to be insufficient to show the situation of the islands in respect to the continent.
Ali Komisija razmišlja o vključitvi novih teritorialnih kazalnikov, da bi bolje razumeli razmere evropskih otoških regij v primerjavi s celino?
Is the Commission considering the inclusion of new territorial indicators to better understand the insular situation in Europe in comparison to the mainland?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0114/2010
Question for oral answer O-0114/2010
v imenu Odbora za promet in turizem Zadeva: Izvajanje Direktive 2008/6/ES glede popolnega oblikovanja notranjega trga poštnih storitev
on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism Subject: Implementation of Directive 2008/6/EC with regard to the completion of the internal market in postal services
V skladu z Direktivo 2008/6/ES bo notranji trg poštnih storitev izoblikovan do decembra 2010, ko bo dostopen za vse izvajalce poštnih storitev.
According to Directive 2008/6/EC , the internal market in postal services will be completed by December 2010, making it accessible to any postal operator.
Kako bo Komisija zajamčila, da bodo države članice zagotovile odprtje trga?
How will the Commission guarantee that Member States ensure the opening of the market?
Vendar pa direktiva zahteva tudi, da države članice zaščitijo delovne pogoje in omogočijo zanesljive univerzalne storitve.
However, the Directive also requires Member States to protect working conditions and to provide for reliable universal services.
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo države članice ohranile socialne razmere za poštne delavce tako v javnem kot v zasebnem sektorju in da bodo vsi izvajalci upoštevali in izvajali standarde zaposlovanja in socialnega varstva, tudi veljavne sheme socialnega varstva na nacionalni ravni?
How will the Commission ensure that Member States safeguard social conditions for postal workers in both the public and private sectors and that all employment and social standards, including social security schemes presently in force at national level, are abided by and implemented by all operators?