natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V tem obdobju naj bi na zaslišanje med drugim povabil generalnega sekretarja zveze NATO, ki naj bi pojasnil morebitno vpletenost sil KFOR in SFOR v primere nezakonitega pridržanja šestih bosanskih državljanov, ki so še vedno zaprti v Guantanamu.
MEPs plan, among other things, to invite the Secretary-General of NATO to a hearing to clarify the possible involvement of SFOR and KFOR forces in the illegal detention of the six Bosnians who still remain in Guantanamo.
Razprava o predlogu poročila
It is for this reason that many members of these two groups decided to vote against the report or abstained.
Dejal, je da je parlament tako pred nalogo boja proti terorizmu, kot tudi pred drugo, prav tako težavno nalogo: "To je naloga prispevati k resnici, tudi resnici o zlorabah, ki so se zgodile v teh letih v imenu boja proti terorizmu - to je namen odbora.
Introducing the debate on the temporary committee's interim report, rapporteur Giovanni Claudio FAVA (PES, IT) told the House that it was being asked to contribute to establishing the truth about abuses committed in the name of the fight against terrorism.
Resnica o odvzemu pravic: pravice so bile odvzete ljudem, obtoženim, da so naši sovražniki, toda kot ljudje, kot obtoženci, imajo pravice - do odvetnika, do procesa, do sojenja, pravico da se jih obravnava kot ljudi."
It was "the truth on denied rights", in other words "rights denied to those accused of being our enemies but who, as human beings, as suspects, have rights - to a fair trial, to a lawyer, to a jury and to dignified humane treatment."
Šlo je za sostorilce, za prikrivanja nezakonitih operacij, nekateri so preprosto obrnili hrbet.
In his committee, he said, "we are trying to give voice to those whose rights have been silenced."
Žalostno pa je, ker je direktor Sismi pred našim odborom zatrdil, da njegova služba ni imela nobenih informacij o tej ugrabitvi."
Nevertheless, she said the Council had not been passive, pointing to debates in November 2005 and a letter written by the then UK Presidency to US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice.
Predstavniki političnih skupin
European Commission
Jas GAWRONSKI (EPP-ED, IT): "Upal sem, da poslanec Fava ne bo omenil današnjega dogodka v Italiji, toda kot član Evropske ljudske stranke in ne kot član odbora naj povem, da je danes Osama Bin Laden zadovoljen, saj se danes osredotočamo na to, da aretiramo tiste, ki preganjajo teroriste. (...)
Franco FRATTINI , Vice-President of the European Commission responsible for Justice, Freedom and Security, said that, on the eve of the first anniversary of the London bombings, this debate was an excellent opportunity to recall that the fight against terrorism is a key priority for the Commission.
Poročilo je pristransko.
The Commission had also provided satellite images when requested.
Dva primera: doslej je odbor zavrnil dve izjavi, ker članom odbora nista bili všeč, ker ne zadovoljujejo levice.
Two examples, until now the committee had not wanted to include two statements by Gijs de Vries and Javier Solana because "they said things the committee didn't like".
Rekli so, da niso bili seznanjeni s kršitvijo zakonodaje držav članic pri sodelovanju z agencijo CIA.
They had "said they were not aware of any violations of the law by any of the Member States of the European Union in cooperation with the CIA".
Zavračajo tudi izjavo, ki nasprotuje njihovi tako imenovani resnici, ki nam jo hočejo vsiliti.
In addition, an expert from Human Rights Watch, which had said "we have suspicions but no proof".
Tudi predstavnik organizacije Human Rights Watch je priznal, da si sicer obstajajo določeni sumi, a ni dokazov.
If the US administration had made mistakes, he argued, that was because it was doing something.
Vsi vemo, da so Američani storili kako napako, ampak kdor dela, tudi greši."
In short, his group was "decisively critical of this report and very disappointed too".
Wolfgang KREISSL-DÖRFLER (PES, DE): "Smo v prvem polčasu našega dela in rad bi jasno povedal, da nihče od socialdemokratov ne nasprotuje boju proti terorizmu, menimo pa, da se ga ne sme izvajati z istimi orodji in orožji kot jih uporabljajo teroristi, ampak na osnovi pravnih in moralnih načel.
On behalf of the Socialist group, Wolfgang KREISSL-DÖRFLER (DE) argued that "the fight against terrorism should not be waged using the same weapons as the terrorists" and that "the end does not justify the means".
Ljudje na ozemlju EU se ne morejo znajti naenkrat v nezakonitih priporih, ne smejo jih mučiti, kot se je zgodilo z enim od nemških državljanov.
"It has nothing to do with anti-Americanism", he stressed.
Tu se razlikujemo v načinu dela Busha.
The question to be answered was "What is a secret service like the CIA entitled to do when it comes to even a friendly country.
Kritika CIE in Busha ni povezana s protiameriškimi občutki, to je del naše naloge.
How are they entitled to act?"
Države članice je treba vprašati, kaj ima letalo CIE iskati pri nas.
He added "If there is suspicion of someone being a terrorist, you have to subject them to the rule of law."
Tudi države kandidatke morajo, če obstaja sum, da je nekdo terorist, upoštevati tista pravna sredstva in oblike sodelovanja z evropskimi inštitucijami, vzpostavljenimi za delovanje EU."
In conclusion, he said "we must demonstrate that the EU is not prepared to give up its freedoms in the name of the fight against terrorism."
Sarah LUDFORD (ALDE, UK): "Območje pravice in človekovih pravic v EU ne deluje dobro.
For the Liberals, Sarah LUDFORD (UK) emphasised that in the EU "the area of justice and human rights is not working properly".
Nekatere države članice še niso prenesle v svoje sisteme evropske protiteroristično zakonodaje, ki je bila sprejeta pred petimi leti, zato nismo ustrezno opremljeni za preiskavo in pregon terorističnih dejanj.
Some Member States had not implemented EU anti-terror legislation five years after it had been passed.
Obenem pa jasni indici kažejo, da so bile v imenu tako imenovane vojne proti terorizmu kršene človekove pravice.
Yet, "at the same time it is apparent that gross human rights abuses have been committed as part of the so-called war on terror".
Evropska unija je dopustila, da smo se znašli v položaju, ko ne moremo preganjati teroristov, lahko pa preganjamo osumljene terorizma in jim kršimo pravice.
So "the EU has allowed a situation to develop where we can't prosecute terrorists but we can persecute terrorist suspects".
Kakšno verodostojnost daje to Uniji tako doma kot v tujini, bodisi za učinkovit boj proti terorizmu, bodisi pri zavzemanju za človekove pravice?"
"What credibility", she went on, "does this give the EU at home or abroad either for effectively combating terrorism or for upholding human rights?"
Takega načina ne more tolerirati ne posamezna država ne ustanova, saj gre za izročanje ljudi, katerih nadaljnja usoda je nato pod vprašajem.
It was a case of delivering people to a country where they risked being tortured or inhuman treatment: “Most victims were arrested illegally, many have disappeared.
Celo vrsto ljudi so ugrabili, mučili, nezakonito prevažali.
“When it comes to torture, every state should take legal steps against those responsible.
Žrtve, ki so pričale pred odborom, so govorile o človeka nevrednem in nezakonitem ravnanju.
More than half the detainees at Guantanamo Bay had been abducted in Afghanistan, he said, which showed that NATO and European countries had been used as staging posts.
Takšnih kršitev človekovih pravic si ne smemo dovoliti.
He wanted Commissioner Frattini to clear up what he did or did not know when he was an Italian minister.
Evropsko sodišče poudarja, da je vsaka država prevzela pozitivno zavezo, da v primeru suma kršitve človekovih pravic ukrepa in sporoča ostalim - to se ni zgodilo.
“Until we know the scale of the phenomenon, there is nothing which allows us to say that there has been a serious violation of human rights.”
Italija je to vrzel zapolnila.
He said there international law needed to be enhanced to deal with the current situation.
Upam, da bodo tudi druge članice sledile njenemu zgledu."
“There is not even one small piece of information that was previously unknown, just a repetition of unfounded media information.
Prišlo je celo do pravih ugrabitev.
If this was do be pursued, he said, it should be by the national authorities who were competent to do so.
Konrad SZYMAŃSKI (UEN, PL): "Jezik poročila bi moral biti popolnoma drugačen.
Roger HELMER (UK) a non aligned MEP said that after 50 hours of hearings "not a scrap of evidence" had been produced.
Ugotoviti je treba pravo razsežnost tega pojava.
In Ireland, there had been 50 such flights including the flight from Italy to Egypt of Abu Omar.
Ameriška vlada ima drugačno tolmačenje teh dogodkov in konvencije proti mučenju ter ima pravico, da to stori.
Seán Ó NEACHTAIN (UEN, IE) said he was pleased that the interim report "does not make any findings against the Irish government".
Mislim, da bi poročilo moralo izpostaviti širši okvir dogodkov: ne smemo le poudarjati, da so ZDA slabe in EU dobra.
Shannon airport had been the loser in this matter, as the US authorities had now decided not to use it for refuelling purposes, costing the airport €10 million in lost revenue.
Pokazati je treba tudi na dobre rezultate sodelovanja."
"They should establish the facts before they speak", he said.
Vendar je videti je, da ni pridobil nobenega konkretnega, stvarnega dokaza, ki ne bi bil znan že od prej.
In the UK, there was the shoot to kill policy that had led to the death of Jean Charles de Menezes in London following the tragic bombings.
Poročilo je le peticija, ki temelji na neutemeljenih poročilih in vesteh iz medijev.
There was a clear difference between anti-Americanism and standing up for human rights.
Ni bilo storjeno dovolj, da bi lahko na podlagi neobstoječih dokazov začeli trošiti denar davkoplačevalcev."
People that had written to me, he said, after the London bombings were not "anti-American" but wanted to ensure that this would not happen again.
Philip CLAEYS (samostojni poslanec, BE): "V začasnem odboru ni bilo možno pridobiti ustreznih dokazov o tem, da bi CIA dejansko mučila ljudi ali izvajala nezakonito dejavnosti, šlo je zgolj za sumničenja in domneve.
Charles TANNOCK (EPP-ED, UK) said he had opposed the setting up of the committee from the start and that its work should stop straight away.
Mislim, da je šlo le za neko fronto, na kateri naj bi začasni odbor izživljal svoje protiameriške težnje.
It was, he said, an expensive duplication of the work of the Council of Europe, reflecting the desire of the left and liberals to bash America.
Pojavlja pa se še nekaj vprašanj.
The report was heavy on supposition and light on proof, he said.
Ljudje se izogibajo jasnim odgovorom na jasna vprašanja, tudi zato nismo mogli pridobiti jasne slike.
While some excesses were inevitable in such a vast enterprise as America's war on terror, he said, "there was not systematic US policy of sending people to be tortured in third countries or to secret camps in Poland."
Mislim, da če je treba že kaj storiti na tem področju, bi to morali storiti mednarodni organi."
We need to be realistic, we are not a court, but politicians trying to draw conclusions based on a balance of probabilities."
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2006-0316 0 NOT XML V0//SL
European Commission response to the debate
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-001-SL DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-005-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-003-SL DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-007-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Parlament želi pojasnilo Evropske centralne banke o njeni vlogi v primeru SWIFT
MEPs ask European Central Bank to explain its role in the SWIFT case
Po razpravi, ki je bila v sredo popoldne, so evropski poslanci v četrtek sprejeli resolucijo, ki izraža " zaskrbljenost ob dejstvu, da se je ustvarilo ozračje, ko se vedno manj spoštuje varstvo zasebnosti in podatkov" zaradi ameriških varnostnih ukrepov proti terorizmu.
The European Parliament adopted a resolution expressing its serious concern on the "climate of deteriorating respect for privacy and data protection" being created by US security measures to fight terrorism.
Zadnji primer, ko so ameriške oblasti od mednarodnega bančnega združenja SWIFT, ki beleži vsa mednarodna bančna nakazila, zahtevale podatke o teh prenosih, je poslance spodbudil, da od ECB zahtevajo pojasnila.
The last case --US government demanding international money transfer records from the Belgium-base society SWIFT-- has created unrest in Europe and made MEPs demand the European Central Bank (ECB) to explain if it was aware of the secret agreement between SWIFT and the American government.
Zahteva ameriških oblasti po mnenju poslancev predstavlja veliko nevarnost, saj dostop do podatkov, s katerimi upravlja SWIFT, omogoča, da se odkrijejo ne samo prenosi sredstev v zvezi z nezakonitimi dejavnostmi, temveč tudi informacije o gospodarskih dejavnostih zadevnih posameznikov in držav, kar lahko povzroči razmah gospodarskega in industrijskega vohunjenja.
According to MEPs, the fact that the U.S. government gained access to financial personal data of European citizens by subpoenaing the Society for Worldwide Inter-bank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT) breaks EU law and poses a real danger: "data managed by SWIFT makes it possible to detect not only transfers linked to illegal activities, but also information on the economic activities of the individuals (...), and this could give rise to large-scale forms of economic and industrial espionage."
Poslanci zato pozivajo Evropsko komisijo, Svet EU in Evropsko centralno banko, naj v celoti pojasnijo, v kolikšnem obsegu so bili seznanjeni o tajnem sporazumu med družbo SWIFT in ameriško vlado.
Therefore they demand EU institutions and the ECB "to explain fully the extent to which they were aware of the secret agreement between SWIFT and the US government."
Zato se tudi zavzemajo, naj poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, skupaj z Odborom za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve čim prej opravi skupno zaslišanje ECB, ostalih evropskih institucij ter drugih zasebnih in javnih institucij, ki so povezane z zadevo, da se odkrije, katere informacije so morda pridobili.
For that purpose, MEPs propose the organisation as soon as possible of a joint hearing with the ECB and other institutions "in order to uncover what information they might have known about."
Parlament zahteva, da se pojasni vloga in delovanje Evropske centralne banke v zvezi s tem, in poziva evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov, naj čim prej preveri, če je bila ECB dolžna ukrepati glede morebitne kršitve varovanja podatkov, za katero je izvedela.
MEPs also demand the European Data Protection Supervisor to verify whether, in according with existing EU rules, the ECB was "obliged to react" to the possible violation of data protection which had come to its knowledge.
Parlament je resolucijo sprejel s 302 glasovi za, 219 proti in 22 vzdržanimi glasovi.
As she saw it, "it is up to the national authorities to do this".
V sredini razpravi o primeru SWIFT je sodeloval tudi slovenski poslanec dr.
Moreover, she later added, the EU would be ready to act "if it turns out that things have taken place that require legislation at the European level".
Mihael BREJC (EPP-ED, SI), ki je v svojem nastopu nasprotoval skupni resoluciji in razlogih za kritiko ameriških ali evropskih oblasti v zvezi z navedbami v medijih: "Tu sta težavi dve.
At present, Mr. Frattini acknowledged, "it seems that there was a transfer of financial information between private companies from the EU to the United States."
Prvič, Evropski parlament ne more začeti resne razprave zgolj na osnovi časopisnih vesti in nejasnih izjav.
The information now at the Commission's disposal, he emphasised, "was not passed on to the Commission previously".
In drugič, spoštovati mora pogodbe in se zavedati svojih pristojnosti.
At this stage, however, he noted, "I do not know whether this would be appropriate, as we have first to learn from the Belgian authorities what exactly happened, how and why."
Znano je, da so se belgijske oblasti lotile preiskave o tem, rezultatov še ni.
"SWIFT apparently [...] has handed over data to the CIA," said Ewa KLAMT (EPP-ED, DE) -- this being a "question of misuse of financial data."
Ob tem je treba jasno povedati, da dostop do sistema SWIFT ne pomeni pregledovanja običajnih transakcij, kot so polog ali dvig gotovine, čeki, elektronska plačila, itd.
In her view, Parliament is unsure of what legal framework to refer to in dealing with the affair: as she put it, "we don't really know precisely what the area is that we're dealing with".
Socialisti in še nekatere druge politične skupine menijo drugače.
That said, it is "urgent" that Parliament takes a look at European legislation "to ensure that there are provisions for this kind of protection".
Vložili so skupni predlog resolucije, v katerem trdijo, da imajo ameriške oblasti dostop do podatkov v sistemu SWIFT in da gre za kršitev temeljnih določb o varstvu osebnih podatkov.
The US authorities, said Martine ROURE (PES, FR), have put in place a programme to monitor financial transactions processed by SWIFT -- "these are facts that President Bush and SWIFT have themselves confirmed."
Ne gre torej, kot pravi gospod Wiersma, za predpostavke, ampak oni govorijo o dejstvih.
The European Union should investigate, therefore, whether the European Central Bank, as one of its institutions, was aware of such activities.
Ne zanima jih tudi dejstvo, da je za preiskavo tega primera pristojna belgijska vlada in v tej fazi še ne Evropski parlament.
Jean-Marie CAVADA (ALDE, FR) was disappointed with the Council Presidency's reaction to the SWIFT affair.
Le tako bo Evropski parlament ohranil ugled v javnosti in ne bo podoben debatnemu klubu."
The US has been operating secret flights and renditions in Europe, he remarked at the end of his intervention -- now it is "rifling through our private bank accounts".
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o prestreganju podatkov iz bančnih nakazil sistema SWIFT s strani ameriških tajnih služb
Giusto CATANIA (GUE/NGL, IT) echoed such sentiments when he noted that "we would be mistaken if we understood the SWIFT case as an isolated matter".
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2006-0317 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 FULL-TEXT DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-002-SL DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-007-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-004-SL DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-009-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Okrepitev policijskega sodelovanja ob mednarodnih dogodkih v EU
Batteries to be collected and recycled, nature protected
Parlament je pobudo obravnaval v postopku posvetovanja in na podlagi poročila poslanke Friede BREPOELS (EPP-ED, BE) iz odbora za notranje zadeve predlog podprl.
Collection schemes and the requirement for distributors to take back waste batteries are the key points of this directive, in my view.
Edino dopolnilo parlamenta, ki vsebinsko posega v besedilo, je varovalka, ki bi omogočala, da se lahko na seznam kadarkoli doda tudi nepričakovan dogodek, pri katerem bi bilo potrebno čezmejno policijsko sodelovanje.
In the view of Johannes BLOKLAND (IND/DEM, NL), who drafted Parliament's report on the directive, this represents important progress: "This provision was not in the original proposal but Parliament thought the consumer should be able to choose higher-performance and long-life batteries.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta okrepitvi čezmejnega policijskega sodelovanja ob mednarodnih dogodkih
Thanks to Parliament, distributors will have to take back the spent portable batteries and accumulators at no cost to the consumer and regardless of when they were placed on the market.
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2006-0297 0 NOT XML V0//SL
Producers must bear any net costs of information campaigns.
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-003-SL DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-008-EN DOC XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-005-SL DOC XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20060628BRI09328 ITEM-010-EN DOC XML V0//EN
Parlament podprl predlog za 308 milijard evrov za strukturne sklade
Conciliation: more transparency for an environmentally-friendly Europe
Poslanci so prižgali zeleno luč predlogu Komisije, po katerem bo za strukturne sklade v prihodnjem šestletnem proračunskem obdobju 2007-2013 namenjenih približno 308 milijard evrov ali 35,7 odstotka proračuna EU.
This convention, concluded in 1998 under the auspices of the UN, aims to involve Europe's citizens in environmental policies by entitling them to gain access to information and to participate in decision-making and, if these rights are not respected, to take legal action to enforce them.
Parlament je namreč podprl pet poročil, ki določajo cilje merila za dodeljevanje sredstev in vire financiranja skladov.
The new EU regulation, the remaining points of which were agreed, will apply these rules to the institutions and bodies of the European Union.
V skladu s konvergenčnimi cilji naj bi si države članice in regije, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, prizadevale, da zaostanek nadoknadijo z ukrepi za doseganje večje gospodarske rasti in zaposlovanja.
Eija Riitta KORHOLA (EPP-ED, FI), who piloted the legislation through Parliament, said: "In these negotiations the EP has strongly supported the rights of citizens and made it easier for them to obtain better information and to do so more quickly.
Za doseganje konvergenčnih ciljev je namenjenih 81,5 odstotka sredstev v kohezijskih skladih, oziroma 251 milijard evrov .
MEPs also succeeded in limiting some exceptions wanted by the Council, although not those relating to banking activities (notably the EIB).
Regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje zajema cilje, ki ne sodijo v poglavje o konvergenci.
And, in particular, Community institutions and bodies must take "due account" of this public-participation process.
Za te cilje je v šestletnem proračunskem obdobju namenjenih približno 16 odstotkov ali 49 milijard evrov sredstev iz strukturnih skladov.
Around €308 billion - or 35.7 per cent of the total EU budget - will now be available to spend, as scheduled, from 1 January 2007.
Poročilo poslanca Konstantinosa HATZIDAKISA (EPP-ED, EL) , ki ga je parlament sprejel s 533 glasovi za, 41 proti in 53 vzdržanimi glasovi , se ukvarja s splošnimi določili delovanja Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj, Evropskega socialnega sklada in Kohezijskega sklada.
The first report adopted by 533 votes in favour, 41 against and 53 abstentions lays down the general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), European Social Fund (ESF) and the Cohesion Fund.
Mnenje parlamenta sicer ni odločilno, kljub temu pa je odboru uspelo z avstrijskim predsedstvom oblikovati kompromisne rešitve, ki so zajete v skupnem stališču Sveta EU, med drugim:
Although the European Parliament only has assent powers over the general regulation (i.e. it can accept or reject the package but not amend it), the rapporteur Konstantinos HATZIDAKIS (EPP-ED, EL) and the Parliament successfully negotiated with the Austrian Presidency to have many of the MEPs' demands included in the Council’s position, including:
- večji poudarek na varovanju okolja in trajnostnem razvoju ;
- enhancement of the environmental aspect, in particular sustainable development, in the management of Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund and introduction of a new article which would ensure that this dimension is always taken into account in the implementation of the Funds;
- izrecno omembo, da morajo skladi podpirati izboljšanje razmer in dostopnost za invalide in ljudi s posebnimi potrebami ;
- a specific mention of the fact that Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund should support the improvement and promotion of accessibility for people with disabilities;