natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali je Komisija seznanjena s kakšnimi drugimi primeri zakonodaje tretjih držav z ekstrateritorialnim učinkom, ki so v nasprotju z ustrezno zakonodajo EU o varstvu podatkov in sorodnimi pravicami?
Is the Commission aware of any other examples of third-country legislation with extra-territorial impact that conflicts with relevant EU data protection legislation and related rights?
Ali Komisija meni, da prenos osebnih podatkov tretjim državam, kot zahtevajo navedeni primeri zakonodaje ZDA, pomeni kršitev ustrezne zakonodaje EU o varstvu podatkov?
Does the Commission consider that the transfer of personal data to third countries, as required in the above-mentioned examples of US legislation, constitutes a violation of relevant EU data protection legislation?
Kako namerava Komisija ukrepati, da bi z ustreznimi organi ZDA nemudoma obravnavala ta vprašanja, in kaj bo naredila, da zaščiti in zastopa interese državljanov EU in podjetij s sedežem v EU?
What immediate action will the Commission take to address these issues with the relevant US authorities, and what will the Commission do to protect and represent the interests of EU citizens and EU-based companies?
Kako namerava Komisija ukrepati, da bi nemudoma zagotovila učinkovito izvrševanje predpisov EU o varstvu podatkov in da zakonodaja tretjih držav ne bo prevladala nad zakonodajo EU in tako izničila pravice in jamstva, ki jih slednja zagotavlja?
What immediate action will the Commission take to ensure that EU data protection rules are effectively enforced and that third-country legislation does not take precedence over EU legislation, thereby nullifying the rights and guarantees it provides?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000023/2012
Question for oral answer O-000023/2012
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Posodobitev carinskega zakonika in uvedba seznama nepreferencialnih pravil o poreklu blaga
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Modernisation of customs code and introduction of list of non-preferential rules of origin
STO si trenutno prizadeva za uskladitev nepreferencialnih pravil o poreklu blaga.
The WTO is undertaking efforts to harmonise non-preferential origin of goods.
Komisija je na podlagi osnutka STO (v okviru prizadevanj za posodobitev carinskega zakonika) oblikovala različna zavezujoča nepreferencialna pravila o poreklu.
Based on the WTO draft, the Commission has developed (as part of modernising the customs code) different binding rules of origin for the non-preferential origin.
Kakšne posledice bo novi sistem imel za evropsko industrijo in selitev proizvodnje večine sestavnih delov evropskih proizvodov?
What consequences will this new system have for European industry and the delocalisation of manufacturing of most components in European products?
Pravila EU o poreklu blaga veljajo za uvoza.
EU rules of origin are required on imports.
Pri izvozu pa obstaja več možnosti.
On exports, however, there are more options.
Ali je Komisija pojasnila, ali so različna pravila o poreklu blaga za izvoz in uvoz v skladu z zakonodajo EU in ali so skladna z STO?
Did the Commission clarify whether different rules of origin for export and import are compatible with EU law and if they are WTO-compliant?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000024/2012
Question for oral answer O-000024/2012
v imenu Odbora za mednarodno trgovino Zadeva: Predlog sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi regionalne Konvencije o vseevropsko-sredozemskih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu
on behalf of the Committee on International Trade Subject: Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin
Regionalna Konvencija o vseevropsko-sredozemskih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu bo pomembno prispevala k uresničitvi območja proste trgovine Euromed ter socialni in gospodarski povezanosti regije.
The Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin will be a major step forward towards a true Euromed Free Trade Area and towards the social and economic integration of the region.
Kako bo glede na predvidevanja Komisije sprejetje tega novega instrumenta učinkovito prispevalo k odzivu EU na arabsko pomlad v okviru partnerstva za demokracijo in skupno blaginjo z državami južnega Sredozemlja in k novemu odzivu na spremembe v sosedstvu?
How does the Commission foresee that the adoption of this new instrument will contribute effectively to the EU’s response to the Arab Spring in the framework of the Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean and the new response to a changing neighbourhood?
Konvencija ne vključuje mehanizma za reševanje sporov.
The Convention does not include a Dispute Settlement Mechanism.
V primeru spora morajo podpisnice sporazuma uporabiti mehanizme reševanja sporov iz posameznih sporazumov o prosti trgovini, če ti obstajajo.
In case of a dispute, parties have to fall back on the DSMs in the individual FTAs, where these exist.
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, zakaj je tako in kako se bodo glede na njena predvidevanja spori učinkovito reševali, ko bo konvencija začela veljati?
Can the Commission explain why this is so and how it foresees that disputes will be settled efficiently once the Convention is in force?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, zakaj konvencija ne vključuje nobene klavzule o pregledu ali reviziji?
Can the Commission explain why the Convention does not include any review or revision clauses?
Ali Komisija načrtuje presojo vpliva o delovanju konvencije v prihodnosti?
Does the Commission envisage an impact assessment on the functioning of the Convention in the future?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je potrebna revizija tega sistema?
Would the Commission agree that a revision of this system is necessary?
Katere vidike konvencije bi lahko izboljšali?
What aspects of the Convention can be improved?
Kljub tehničnemu dogovoru med EU in Izraelom nekatere družbe v okviru pridružitvenega sporazuma EU-Izrael izvažajo v EU blago s poreklom z zasedenih ozemelj.
Despite the EU-Israel Technical Arrangement, certain companies export goods originating in the occupied territories to the EU under the EU-Israel Association Agreement.
Carine držav članic EU nikakor ne morejo preveriti vsake pošiljke, uporaba poštne številke na carinskih dokumentih iz Izraela pa še vedno dopušča očitne vrzeli.
EU Member States’ customs services cannot possibly check each consignment, while the use of the postcode on customs documents coming from Israel still leaves obvious loopholes.
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje konvencije na način, ki ne povečuje nevarnosti morebitnih zlorab?
How will the Commission ensure the effective implementation of the Convention in a manner that does not increase the risk of possible malpractices?
S katerimi dodatnimi ukrepi namerava Komisija dvostransko ali v okviru konvencije zagotoviti, da bodo pogodbenice, ki niso sklenile podobnega tehničnega dogovora z Izraelom, izvajale enakovredna pravila pred kumulacijo?
Which additional steps does the Commission envisage, bilaterally or under the Convention, to ensure that Parties that have not concluded a similar technical arrangement with Israel enforce equivalent rules before cumulation?
Ali Komisija načrtuje usklajevanje s carinami držav članic, da bi zagotovila uporabo tehničnega dogovora tudi pri kumuliranih izdelkih?
Does the Commission envisage coordinating with Member States’ customs services to ensure that the Technical Arrangement is applied also to cumulated products?
Ali bo Komisija obravnavala možnost spremembe tehničnega dogovora v obvezujoč dogovor na evropski ravni?
Will the Commission consider elevating the Technical Arrangement to a binding agreement at a European level?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000025/2012
Question for oral answer O-000025/2012
v imenu Odbora za regionalni razvoj Zadeva: Reprogramiranje strukturnih skladov za uspešnejši boj z brezposelnostjo ter za pomoč malim in srednjem velikim podjetjem
on behalf of the Committee on Regional Development Subject: Reprogramming of the structural funds to better combat youth unemployment and help SMEs
Na neformalnem Evropskem svetu 30. januarja 2012 je predsednik Barroso predlagal, da bi države članice denar, ki ga je treba še dodeliti v sklopu strukturnih skladov EU, namenile za pomoč malim in srednje velikim podjetjem ter za boj proti brezposelnosti.
At the Informal European Council of 30 January 2012, President Barroso proposed that the Member States redirect the money still to be allocated under the EU structural funds into helping SMEs and combating youth unemployment.
Ocenil je, da skupna razpoložljiva sredstva znašajo 82 milijard EUR.
President Barroso estimated on that occasion that the available funding totalled EUR 82 billion.
Države članice je pozval, naj skupaj s Komisijo preučijo prednosti reprogramiranja skladov.
He asked the Member States to sit down with the Commission and look at the advantages of re-programming funds.
Glede na to, da so bila strukturna sredstva za obdobje 2007–2013 že razdeljena državam članicam in da so jih te že namenile za operativne programe in prednostne naloge, Odbor za regionalni razvoj Komisijo poziva, naj odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Taking into account the fact that all the structural funds for the period 2007-2013 have already been distributed among the Members States and that they are also all allocated to operational programmes and priorities, this Committee would appreciate it if the Commission could respond to the following questions:
- Ali lahko Komisija Parlamentu posreduje natančne podatke o tem, kako je bil določen oziroma izračunan znesek 82 milijard EUR, ki naj bi ga bilo treba še razporediti?
- Could the Commission provide Parliament with accurate information on how the amount of EUR 82 billion still to be allocated has been reached or calculated?
Ali lahko posreduje tudi podrobne podatke o razčlenitvi tega zneska po posameznih strukturnih skladih?
Could it provide detailed information on its distribution through the different structural funds?
Ali lahko predloži podatke o dosedanji stopnji črpanja iz strukturnih skladov?
Could it provide information on the absorption rate of structural funding to date?
- Ali lahko Komisija posreduje informacije o konkretnih ukrepih, ki jih predvideva za reprogramiranje strukturnih sredstev, ki še niso bila dodeljena na zakonsko obvezujoč način, v letih 2012 in 2013, in o tem, kako namerava obravnavati države članice, ki teh sredstev ne bodo pripravljene reprogramirati?
- Could the Commission inform us about the precise actions it is envisaging to reprogramme those structural funds for 2012 and 2013 which have not yet been allocated in a legally binding way, and how does the Commission intend to deal with those Member States not willing to reprogramme these funds?
- Ali lahko Komisija Parlamentu posreduje oceno učinka nedavne spremembe splošne uredbe, ki uvaja povečano stopnjo sofinanciranja?
- Could the Commission provide Parliament with an assessment of the impact of the recent change to the General Regulation introducing an increased co-financing rate?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000026/2012
Question for oral answer O-000026/2012
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Pristop EU k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: EU accession to the ECHR
Evropska konvencija o človekovih pravicah (EKČP) je nastala na ruševinah druge svetovne vojne, da bi varovala demokracijo, vladavino prava, človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine v Evropi.
The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was born out of the ashes of the Second World War to safeguard democracy, the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe.
Posameznikom omogoča, da vlade, ki kršijo temeljne svoboščine, privedejo pred Evropsko sodišče.
It provides a means for individuals to bring governments responsible for fundamental rights violations to account before a European Court.
EU je Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah vedno pripisovala zelo velik pomen, kar dokazuje dejstvo, da je pristop države k Svetu Evrope in k tej konvenciji pogoj za njeno članstvo v EU.
The EU has always accorded the highest importance to the ECHR, as demonstrated by the fact that the accession of a State to the Council of Europe and the ECHR is a precondition for EU accession.
Poleg tega si je EU že dolgo prizadevala za pristop k tej konvenciji, kar je zdaj v skladu s členom 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji njena dolžnost.
Furthermore, the EU has for a long time aspired to accede to the ECHR and this is now a duty laid down in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union.
Komisija se je s Svetom Evrope pogajala za pristop EU k tej konvenciji.
The Commission has been negotiating the EU’s accession to the ECHR with the Council of Europe.
Pripravili so osnutek dogovora, vendar se nekatere evropske vlade ne strinjajo z izidom, s čimer ogrožajo celoten pristopni proces.
A draft agreement has been reached but it seems that some European governments are contesting the outcome, putting the whole accession process at risk.
Ali lahko Svet podrobno odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Can the Council provide details as follows:
- Kakšno je stanje pogajanj o pristopu EU k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah, vsebina osnutka sporazuma ter predlogi, razprave in stališča v Svetu?
- What is the state of play in negotiations on the EU’s accession to the ECHR, the contents of the draft agreement, and the proposals, discussions and positions in the Council?
- Kakšen je časovni načrt za postopek ratifikacije pristopnega sporazuma in dejanski pristop EU k tej konvenciji?
- What is the planned timeline for the ratification process for the accession agreement and for the EU’s actual accession to the ECHR?
- Kakšni so izidi razprav med državami članicami v Svetu ter predlogi in stališča EU in njenih držav članic v organih Sveta Evrope ter v odnosu do teh organov, kar zadeva pristop k tej konvenciji?
- What are the outcomes of the discussions between Member States within the Council, and the proposals and positions of the EU and of its Member States inside – and in relation to – the Council of Europe bodies on accession to the ECHR?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000027/2012
Question for oral answer O-000027/2012
Ali lahko Komisija podrobno odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Can the Commission provide details as follows:
- Kaj lahko pove o razpravi s Svetom Evrope na eni strani ter z državami članicami in Svetom na drugi v zvezi s postopkom ratifikacije pristopnega sporazuma?
- What information can it provide on its debate with the Council of Europe on the one hand and with Member States and the Council on the other hand regarding the ratification process for the accession agreement?
- Kakšen je časovni načrt za dejanski pristop EU k tej konvenciji?
- What is the planned timeline for the EU’s actual accession to the ECHR?
- Kakšni so izidi razprav med državami članicami v Svetu ter predlogi in stališča EU in njenih držav članic v organih Sveta Evrope ter v odnosu do teh organov, kar zadeva pristop k tej konvenciji?
- What are the outcomes of the debates between Member States within the Council, and the proposals and positions of the EU and of its Member States inside – and in relation to – the Council of Europe bodies on accession to the ECHR?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000028/2012
Question for oral answer O-000028/2012
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Spopadanje z razmahom sladkorne bolezni v EU
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Addressing the EU diabetes epidemic
Po ocenah kar 33 milijonov državljanov EU – skoraj 10 % celotnega prebivalstva EU – trpi zaradi diabetesa.
Almost 33 million EU citizens - nearly 10% of the total EU population - are estimated to be affected by diabetes.
Povrhu tega je bil diabetes priznan kot ena od štirih glavnih nenalezljivih bolezni v nedavno sprejeti politični deklaraciji ZN s srečanja generalne skupščine na visoki ravni o preprečevanju in obvladovanju nenalezljivih bolezni ter v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. septembra 2011 in nenalezljivih boleznih , v kateri ta „poudarja, da je treba po priporočilu Sveta v sodelovanju z ustreznimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, tudi bolniki in zdravstvenimi delavci, oblikovati strategijo EU o kroničnih nenalezljivih boleznih, ki bo v posameznih razdelkih obravnavala štiri najpogostejše nenalezljive bolezni“.
Diabetes has also been recognised as one of the four main non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the recently adopted UN Political declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of NCDs and in the European Parliament Resolution of 15 September 2011 on NCDs which ‘stresses the importance of establishing an EU strategy on chronic NCDs, to be followed by a Council recommendation, with individual sections dealing with the four most common NCDs’.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000029/2012
Question for oral answer O-000029/2012
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Prispevek skupne ribiške politike k ustvarjanju javnih dobrin
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Contribution of the CFP to the production of public goods
Ribiški sektor ima poleg svoje temeljne funkcije, ki je oskrbovanje prebivalcev z ribami, in pomena, ki ga zato ima za zagotavljanje uravnotežene prehrane v državah članicah, tudi obsežen niz drugih namenov in ciljev.
The fisheries sector, in addition to its key role of supplying fish and its consequent importance for the food balance in the Member States, has a wide range of functions and objectives.
Ti prispevajo k družbenoekonomskemu pomenu tega sektorja, ki ga zato še zdaleč ne moremo vrednotiti zgolj glede na vrednost iztovora.
These all contribute to its socio-economic significance, which therefore cannot be assessed purely in terms of catch value.
Poleg tega ima v splošnem kontekstu ribiškega sektorja mali ribolov poseben pomen za družbenoekonomsko, okoljsko in kulturno načrtovanje.
Within the fisheries sector in the broadest sense, small-scale fishing is of particular importance in socio-economic, environmental, and cultural terms.
Večnamenskost ribiškega sektorja, skupaj z akvakulturo, se med drugim odraža na različnih področjih:
The multifunctional nature of the fisheries sector (including aquaculture) finds expression in a whole range of aspects, for example:
- prispevek k razvoju in družbenoekonomski blaginji obalnih skupnosti, k lokalnemu razvoju in k neposrednemu ustvarjanju delovnih mest v tem sektorju;
– contribution to the advancement and socio-economic well-being of coastal communities, in terms of local development and direct job creation in the sector;
- ohranjanje in ustvarjanje gospodarskih dejavnosti in delovnih mest, tako v proizvodnji kot pri predelavi (ladjedelništvo, predelava rib, turizem in gostinstvo ipd.);
– preservation and creation of economic activity and jobs, both upstream and downstream from fishing as such (shipbuilding, processing of fishery products, tourism and catering, etc.);
- oskrbovanje prebivalstva s kakovostnimi proizvodi z visoko hranilno vrednostjo, na primer s svežimi ribami;
– supplying products of high quality and nutritional value, such as fresh fish;
- ohranjanje zgodovinske in kulturne dediščine ter lokalne tradicije, povezane z ribiškim sektorjem;
– conservation of the historical and cultural heritage and local traditions linked to fisheries;
- podpora izobraževanju in znanstvenemu raziskovanju morja, rek in sladkih voda ter prispevek k boljšemu poznavanju stanja teh ekosistemov.
– supporting education and scientific research related to seas, estuaries, and inland waters and helping to advance and update knowledge of the state of their ecosystems.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000030/2012
Question for oral answer O-000030/2012
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Položaj migrantov v Grčiji
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: The situation of migrants in Greece
Leta 2010 je v EU s prečkanjem meje med Grčijo in Turčijo vstopilo 90 % nezakonitih migrantov, ta delež pa je bil leta 2011 še vedno visok.
Arrivals of irregular migrants at the Greek-Turkish border accounted for 90% of irregular entries to the EU in 2010 and continued to be significant in 2011.
Za varovanje pravic teh migrantov in zadostitev njihovim potrebam je odgovorna Grčija.
Greece bears the responsibility for securing the rights and providing for the needs of these migrants.
Agencija za upravljanje meja (Frontex) je leta 2010 na grško-turško mejo prvič odposlala skupino za hitro posredovanje na mejah, s čimer se je sprva zmanjšalo število nezakonitih vstopov.
Frontex conducted the first ever RABIT deployment at the Greek-Turkish border in 2010, which initially decreased the number of irregular entries.
Kljub stalni skupni operaciji Poseidon Land pa se je dotok nezakonitih migrantov ponovno povečal, in sicer so jih na dan prijeli več kot 300.
Despite the ongoing Joint Operation Poseidon Land, the inflow of irregular migrants has risen again, with more than 300 apprehensions per day.
K tem kritičnim razmeram prispeva tudi Turčija, saj ne izvaja sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu oziroma pri njih ne sodeluje ter si ne prizadeva, da bi razvili celovit in delujoč azilni sistem preprečili in zatrli organizirani kriminal, kot sta trgovina z ljudmi in tihotapljenje ljudi.
Turkey contributes to this critical situation by refusing to fully enforce or cooperate on readmission agreements, to develop a comprehensive and functioning asylum system and to prevent and fight against the trafficking and smuggling of human beings by organised crime.
Potem ko je Grčija leta 2010 sprejela nacionalni akcijski načrt, je bilo doseženega nekaj napredka.
In 2010, Greece adopted a National Action Plan; some progress has been made since.
Država od leta 2011 prejema tudi pomoč prek Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada, da bi vzpostavila sodobni azilni sistem in sistem za sprejem.
The country is also receiving support through EASO since spring 2011, in order to set up a modern asylum and reception system.
Kljub težavam Grčije pri črpanju sredstev iz skladov EU pa je treba čim prej vzpostaviti infrastrukturo za začetno preverjanje in obravnavanje migrantov in prosilcev za azil.
Yet, despite Greece’s difficulties in absorbing EU funds, new infrastructures for the initial screening and referral of migrants and asylum-seekers need to be established urgently.
- Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da bodo v Grčiji vprašanje naraščajočega dotoka migrantov reševali v skladu s skupnim pravnim redom za azil?
- How will the Commission contribute to ensuring that the increasing migration flows in Greece will be dealt with in accordance with the asylum acquis?
- Ali je Komisija ugotovila kak napredek glede vračanja migrantov, ki so nezakonito prečkali evropske meje, v Turčijo?
- Has the Commission observed any progress regarding the return through Turkey of migrants who have irregularly crossed European borders?
- S katerimi ukrepi namerava izboljšati sodelovanje s Turčijo na področju mejnega nadzora in boja proti nezakoniti migraciji?
- What steps is the Commission envisaging in order to improve the cooperation with Turkey on border control and combating irregular migration?
Katere ukrepe načrtuje, da bi turške oblasti spodbudila k učinkovitejšemu boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu?
What measures is the Commission planning in order to push for a more effective fight of organised crime by the Turkish authorities?
- Ali ima Evropski azilni podporni urad dovolj finančnih in človeških virov, da bi v Grčiji dejansko nekaj dosegel?
- Does EASO posses enough financial and human resources in order to have a meaningful impact in Greece?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000031/2012
Question for oral answer O-000031/2012
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Pristop EU k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah in reforma Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: EU accession to the ECHR and ECtHR reform
EU je Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah vedno pripisovala zelo velik pomen, kar dokazuje dejstvo, da je pristop države k Svetu Evrope in k tej konvenciji pogoj za njeno članstvo v EU.
The EU has always given the highest importance to the ECHR, as demonstrated by the fact that the entry of a State in the Council of Europe and the ECHR is a precondition for EU accession.