natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Varčevanje z energijo in energetska učinkovitost: Kaj namerava Komisija storiti, da bi zmanjšali energetsko povpraševanje v EU, zlasti s spodbujanjem ukrepov za ohranjanje energije in energetsko učinkovitost, tudi s finančnimi spodbudami, s katerimi bi dosegli, da bi države članice izvajale veljavno zakonodajo?
Aspects of energy saving and energy efficiency: What does the Commission intend to do to cut energy demand in the EU, in particular by promoting energy conservation and energy efficiency measures, including financial incentives and ways of encouraging better Member-State implementation of existing legislation?
Kako bo zagotovljeno, da bo EU sprejela obvezen cilj za energetsko varčevanje/učinkovitost do leta 2020?
How will it be ensured that the EU adopts a mandatory 2020 energy saving / efficiency target?
Prednost energetske učinkovitosti in obnovljivih virov v prihodnji drugi strateški energetski oceni: Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo pri strateškem oblikovanju prihodnje energetske politike EU kot trajnostne rešitve za zmanjšanje odvisnosti EU od konvencionalnih goriv prednost imeli varčevanje z energijo, energetska učinkovitost in obnovljivi viri energije?
Prioritisation of energy efficiency and renewables in the future second strategic energy review: How will the Commission ensure that energy saving, energy efficiency and renewable energies are prioritised in the strategic design of future EU energy policy as sustainable means of reducing the EU’s dependency on conventional fuels?
Kako namerava Komisija za elektrarne na fosilna goriva uvesti zgornjo mejo emisij toplogrednih plinov, da bi spodbudila inovacije in tehnološko nevtralnost?
How does the Commission intend to impose a greenhouse gas emission limit on fossil fuel power plants in order to promote innovation while being technologically neutral?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0092/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0092/08
Zadeva: Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije: oviri pri njegovi reformi
Subject: European Union Solidarity Fund: obstacles for its reform
Predlog Evropske komisije KOM(2005)0108 - 2005/0033 (COD), ki spreminja uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 o Solidarnostnem skladu Evropske unije, Svet zadržuje že več kot dve leti, odkar ga je Evropski parlament prvič obravnaval.
The European Commission proposal COM(2005)0108 – 2005/0033 (COD) modifying Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 on the European Union Solidarity Fund has been kept on hold by the Council for more than two years since the European Parliament gave it its first reading.
Evropski parlament meni, da je nujno treba sprejeti uredbo o solidarnostnem skladu, ki bo omogočila soočanje z izzivi in bo Uniji dopuščala nudenje hitre in učinkovite pomoči državam članicam, ki jih je prizadela katastrofa.
The European Parliament considers it to be of paramount importance to have a Solidarity Fund Regulation which meets the challenges and allows the Union to deliver prompt and effective assistance when Member States suffer a disaster.
Ali lahko Evropska komisija Parlamentu pojasni vzroke za nezmožnost Sveta, da bi dosegel skupno stališče?
Could the European Commission explain to Parliament what are the causes of Council’s inability to reach a Common Position?
Katere države članice podpirajo pristop Parlamenta in Evropske komisije in katere niso naklonjene reformi solidarnostnega sklada ter zakaj ne?
Which Member States are in favour of Parliament’s and the European Commission’s approach and which are reluctant to agree to the reform of the Solidarity Fund and on what grounds?
Ali Evropska komisija načrtuje kakšne ukrepe ali politično pobudo, ki bi premaknila stvari z mrtve točke?
Does the European Commission foresee any action or political initiative in the future which will successfully unblock the situation?
Poročilo Michela Barniera z naslovom „Za evropsko enoto civilne zaščite: pomoč Evrope” je bilo objavljeno leta 2006 in je prejelo popolno podporo Parlamenta, saj se v njem predlaga oblikovanje evropske enote za civilno zaščito.
Michel Barnier’s report ‘For a European civil protection force: Europe Aid’ was published back in 2006 and received the full support of Parliament in so far as it proposed the creation of a European civil protection force.
Predlog je tesno povezan z revizijo solidarnostnega sklada, vendar do sedaj še niso sledili nobeni ukrepi.
This proposal is intimately related to the revision of the Solidarity Fund but as yet we have seen no follow-up.
Ali Evropska komisija načrtuje kakšno zakonodajno pobudo na tem področju?
Does the European Commission envisage any legislative initiative in this field?
UL L 311 z dne 14.11.2002, str.
OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0093/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0093/08
Zadeva: Obvladovanje cen energije
Subject: Controlling energy prices
Ali lahko Svet pojasni, kako namerava EU kratko- in dolgoročno zmanjšati vpliv višanja cen nafte na družbo?
It would be helpful if the Council could clarify how the EU intends to mitigate the impact of the rise in oil prices on society, in the short and long term.
Kateri ukrepi so predvideni, da se odpravi povezava med cenami naftnega olja in višanjem cen energije, ki povzroča rast cen podjetij za dobavo energije v EU?
What measures are planned to break the link between the prices of fossil oil and the increase in energy prices, which is pushing up the prices charged by supply companies in the EU?
Kako bi bilo mogoče narediti naftne trge preglednejše z zanesljivimi informacijami?
How can the oil markets be made more transparent, with reliable information?
Ali se Svet strinja, da bi bilo treba ukrepati proti špekulacijam naftnih družb?
Does the Council not think it should act against speculation by oil companies?
Kako namerava Svet povečati vlogo Evropske investicijske banke pri financiranju programov za povečanje energetske učinkovitosti, zlasti za mala in srednje velika podjetja?
How does the Council intend to improve the role of the EIB in funding projects for growth and energy efficiency, with special attention to SMEs?
Ali Svet lahko uvede ukrepe pomoči zlasti za družinske prihodke ter mala in srednje velika podjetja?
Is the Council able to adopt targeted measures to assist family incomes and SMEs in particular?
Ali je Svet opravil celostno analizo načina, na katerega so naftne družbe povišale cene goriv za potrošnike zaradi nedavne krize cen nafte?
Has the Council conducted a full analysis of the way in which oil companies have increased the price of fuel for consumers in the context of the recent oil price crisis?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0094/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0094/08
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, kako namerava EU kratko- in dolgoročno zmanjšati vpliv višanja cen nafte na družbo?
It would be helpful if the Commission could clarify how the EU intends to mitigate the impact of the rise in oil prices on society, in the short and long term.
Kaj bo storila Komisija za zmanjšanje nepričakovanih dobičkov pri sistemu oblikovanja cen električne energije, ki te cene samodejno poviša?
What will the Commission do in order to cut the windfall profits in electricity price formation which is the system that automatically increases the electricity prices?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi bilo treba ukrepati proti špekulacijam naftnih družb?
Does the Commission not think it should act against speculation by oil companies?
Kako namerava Komisija povečati vlogo Evropske investicijske banke pri financiranju programov za povečanje energetske učinkovitosti, zlasti za mala in srednje velika podjetja?
How does the Commission intend to improve the role of the EIB in funding projects for growth and energy efficiency, with special attention to SMEs?
Ali Komisija lahko uvede ukrepe pomoči zlasti za družinske prihodke ter mala in srednje velika podjetja?
Is the Commission able to adopt targeted measures to assist family incomes and SMEs in particular?
Ali je Komisija opravila celostno analizo načina, na katerega so naftne družbe povišale cene goriv za potrošnike zaradi nedavne krize cen nafte?
Has the Commission conducted a full analysis of the way in which oil companies have increased the price of fuel for consumers in the context of the recent oil price crisis?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0095/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0095/08
Zadeva: Demokracija, človekove pravice in novi sporazum o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med EU in Vietnamom
Subject: Democracy, human rights and the new EU-Vietnam Partnership and Cooperation Agreement
– ob upoštevanju, da so se novembra 2007 med obiskom predsednika Evropske komisije Barrosa začela pogajanja o novem sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med EU in Vietnamom, prvi krog pogajanj pa je bil julija 2008;
– Considering that, in November 2007, during the visit of the European Commission President, Mr Barroso, the negotiations for a new EU-Vietnam Partnership and Cooperation Agreement were launched, and a first negotiation round took place in July 2008;
– ob upoštevanju, da bo nov krog pogajanj v Hanoju 20. in 21. oktobra 2008;
– considering that a new negotiation round will take place in Hanoi on 20 and 21 October 2008;
– ob upoštevanju, da sedanji sporazum o sodelovanju vključuje določbo o človekovih pravicah, na podlagi katere je v njegovem prvem členu navedeno, da je spoštovanje človekovih pravic in načel demokracije osnova za sodelovanje med pogodbenicami in pomeni bistveni element za sporazum;
– considering that the actual Cooperation Agreement includes the human rights clause, on the basis of which at Article 1 it states that 'respect for human rights and democratic principles is the basis for the cooperation between the Parties and constitutes an essential element of the Agreement';
– meni, da je Socialistična republika Vietnam enopartijska država pod nadzorom vietnamske komunistične partije, ki izvaja popoln nadzor nad sindikati, združenji, verskimi organizacijami in mediji;
– considering that the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is a single-party State, under the control of the Vietnamese Communist Party, which exerts full control also over trade unions, associations, religious organisations and the media;
– ob upoštevanju, da je bilo v Vietnamu zabeleženo sistematično kršenje človekovih in državljanskih pravic, zlasti v odnosu do narodnostnih manjšin, kot so Montagnardi (Dega), in nepriznane verske organizacije, kot je Združena budistična cerkev, ter da je bilo po navedbah vplivnih nevladnih organizacij v zadnjih osemnajstih mesecih na zaporno kazen obsojenih najmanj 26 političnih oporečnikov;
– considering that systematic violations of human and civil rights have been documented in Vietnam, particularly against ethnic minorities such as the Montagnards (Degar) and unrecognised religious organisations like the Unified Buddhist Church, and that, according to influential NGOs, in the last 18 months, at least 26 political dissidents have been sentenced to jail;
– ob upoštevanju, da je Vietnam država, v kateri se še vedno izvaja smrtna kazen, ter da je v zadnjih nekaj letih uporaba smrtne kazni narasla, leta 2008 pa je bilo najmanj 83 oseb obsojenih na smrt, tudi 14 žensk;
– considering that Vietnam is a country that maintains the death penalty; that in the last few years the use of the death penalty has increased and that in 2008 at least 83 people were sentenced to death, including 14 women;
Kako, če sploh, si Svet prizadeva, da bi zagotovil, da bo novi sporazum o sodelovanju in partnerstvu privedel do konkretnih ukrepov v zvezi s spoštovanjem človekovih pravic in vzpostavitvijo demokracije v Vietnamu?
What initiative, if any, has the Council undertaken to make sure that the negotiations for a new cooperation and partnership agreement will lead to concrete steps forward with regard to respect for human rights and the establishment of democracy in Vietnam?
Katera oprijemljiva izboljšanja so po mnenju Sveta potrebna, da bi dosegli sporazum, ki bil zadovoljiv tudi iz vidika demokracije in človekovih pravic?
What tangible improvements does the Council deem necessary to achieve an agreement which could be satisfactory, including its democracy and human rights aspects?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0096/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0096/08
Kako, če sploh, si Komisija prizadeva, da bi zagotovila, da bo novi sporazum o sodelovanju in partnerstvu privedel do konkretnih ukrepov v zvezi s spoštovanjem človekovih pravic in vzpostavitvijo demokracije v Vietnamu?
What initiative, if any, has the Commission undertaken to make sure that the negotiations for a new cooperation and partnership agreement will lead to concrete steps forward with regard to respect for human rights and the establishment of democracy in Vietnam?
Katera oprijemljiva izboljšanja so po mnenju Komisije potrebna, da bi dosegli sporazum, ki bil zadovoljiv tudi iz vidika demokracije in človekovih pravic?
What tangible improvements does the Commission deem necessary to achieve an agreement which could be satisfactory, including its democracy and human rights aspects?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0097/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0097/08
Zadeva: Vidiki ponarejanja, ki zadevajo varstvo potrošnikov
Subject: Consumer protection aspects of counterfeiting
Ponarejanje in piratstvo se v zadnjih letih vedno hitreje razvijata.
Counterfeiting and piracy have developed at an increasing rate in recent years.
Leta 2007 so carinske službe zabeležile več kot 43.000 primerov ponarejenega blaga, ki je bilo zaplenjeno na zunanji meji EU, kar je skoraj 17% povečanje v primerjavi s 37.000 primeri leta 2006.
In 2007, customs registered over 43 000 cases of fake goods seized at the EU's external border, compared to 37 000 in 2006, an increase of almost 17%.
Pri ponarejanju gre vedno bolj za ponarejena zdravila, živila, kozmetične izdelke, igrače in elektronsko opremo.
Counterfeiting is increasingly about fake medicines, fake food products, fake cosmetics, fake toys and fake electronic equipment.
Poleg tega, da ti proizvodi povzročajo veliko gospodarsko škodo podjetjem na notranjem trgu, lahko močno škodijo potrošnikom.
In addition to the serious economic damage to businesses in the internal market, these products can cause serious harm to consumers.
Parlament zato sprašuje Komisijo:
Parliament therefore asks the Commission:
Kaj namerava storiti, da bo izboljšala upravno strukturo pri svojem delu na tem področju?
What action can the Commission take to improve the administrative structure of the Commission's work in this field?
Ali bo Komisija ustanovila enoto za notranje usklajevanje, da bi tako združila zadevne skupine različnih generalnih direktoratov, in razvila skupni program ukrepov?
Will the Commission set up an internal coordination unit in order to bring together the relevant teams of the different DGs and develop a joint action programme?
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi statistične podatke o tem, koliko ljudem je trgovina s ponarejenim blagom povzročila škodo (zlasti njihovemu zdravju in varnosti)?
Can the Commission produce statistics on how many people have been harmed as a result of the market in counterfeit goods (especially in relation to health and safety)?
Ali Komisija meni, da je sedanje zbiranje podatkov v zvezi z ogroženostjo potrošnikov ustrezno?
Does the Commission consider current data collection in relation to consumer detriment adequate?
Ali je mogoče izboljšati sistem RAPEX tako, da bo zagotovil bistvene informacije o škodi, ki jo potrošnikom povzročijo ponarejeni proizvodi?
Can the RAPEX system be improved to provide essential information on consumer harm as a result of counterfeit products?
Kaj namerava ukreniti Komisija, da bo zagotovila zaupanje potrošnikov v proizvode, ki se prodajajo na notranjem trgu?
What steps will the Commission take to ensure consumers´ trust and confidence in products on sale in the internal market?
Katere nadaljnje ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela za strožje izvajanje in (carinske) preglede v EU in zunaj nje?
What further measures will the Commission take for stronger enforcement and (customs) controls inside and outside the EU?
Kaj namerava ukreniti Komisija, da bo potrošnike obvestila o nevarnosti ponarejenih proizvodov za njihovo zdravje in varnost?
What action will the Commission take to inform consumers of the threats to their health and safety presented by counterfeit goods?
Kako bo Komisija v te ukrepe vključila države članice?
How will the Commission involve Member States in such action?
Ali bi Komisija podprla zamisel o ustanovitvi observatorija EU za ponarejanje blaga in piratstvo?
Would the Commission support the idea of creating an EU observatory for counterfeiting goods and piracy?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0098/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0098/08
Glede na to, da ima EU vodilno vlogo v boju proti podnebnim spremembam in si je kot cilj zadala omejitev segrevanja ozračja za +2°C v primerjavi s predindustrijskimi ravnmi, ali namerava Komisija predlagati skupno strategijo EU za opustitev črpanja in uporabe fosilnih goriv v arktični regiji ter si prizadevati za mednarodni sporazum o arktični listini, ki vključuje isto načelo?
Given the EU's leadership role in the global fight against climate change and the EU's objective of limiting climate change to +2°C compared to preindustrial levels, will the Commission make a proposal for an EU common strategy to refrain from extraction and use of fossil fuels from the Arctic region, and to seek international agreement on an Arctic Charter enshrining the same principle?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0099/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0099/08
Zadeva: Evidenca imen letalskih potnikov v EU
Subject: EU PNR
Podatki za evidenco imen letalskih potnikov se prvenstveno zbirajo za komercialne namene, vedno bolj pa služijo tudi številnim varnostnim namenom (kot so varnost letalstva, nadzor priseljevanja, davčne goljufije, pranje denarja, preprečevanje terorizma in kriminalitete ter preprečevanje nalezljivih bolezni itd.), kar je bilo septembra 2001 uvedeno v ZDA, Kanadi in Avstraliji, nedavno pa tudi v Združenem kraljestvu, Franciji in na Danskem.
PNR data are data originally collected for commercial purposes, while now serving an increasing number of security purposes (such as aviation security, immigration control, fiscal fraud, money laundering, preventing terrorism and crimes and prevention of communicable diseases, etc) as introduced since September 2001 by the US, Canada, Australia and more recently by the UK, France and Denmark.
Zato se ti nameni in s tem povezani pogoji za obdelavo podatkov med državami razlikujejo ter se nenehno spreminjajo.
Therefore these purposes and the related conditions for data treatment differ from country to country and evolve constantly.
Ob upoštevanju, da bi EU in njene države članice morale ohraniti svojo tradicijo odprtih držav ter zagotoviti svobodo meddržavnega gibanja, kot jo določa člen 12.2 Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah iz leta 1966, lahko Svet:
Bearing in mind that the EU and its Member States should preserve their tradition of being open countries and ensure freedom of transnational movement of persons as granted by Art. 12.2 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, can the Council:
V zvezi z učinkovitostjo: priskrbi dokaze (in stopnjo pogostosti napak) o množičnem zbiranju in uporabi podatkov iz evidenc imen vseh letalskih potnikov (zlasti samodejnih metod analize, kot so profiliranje in izkopavanje podatkov, primerjanje podatkov iz evidenc letalskih potnikov s kazalniki tveganja) v boju proti terorizmu, glede na to, da do sedaj ni bil noben od obstoječih programov ustrezno ocenjen?
As to effectiveness: provide evidence (and the rate of errors) of the effectiveness of mass collection and use of PNR data of all passengers (particularly automated methods of analysis such as profiling and data mining, running PNR data against risk indicators) in the fight against terrorism, given that to date none of the existing schemes has been adequately evaluated?
V zvezi z omejitvami glede namena: jasno in natančno navede (člen 8 evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin), za katere namene bi bilo treba zbirati podatke iz evidence imen letalskih potnikov na ravni EU; poleg tega priskrbi dokaze o tem, da so podatki iz evidenc imen letalskih potnikov primerni za druge namene poleg boja proti terorizmu, kot so denimo preprodaja drog, priseljevanje ali javno zdravje?
As to purpose limitation: state in clear and precise terms (Art. 8 of the ECHR) for which purposes PNR data should be collected at EU level; moreover provide evidence on the appropriateness of PNR data for purposes other than to counter-terrorism, such as drug trafficking, immigration or public health issues?
V zvezi s subsidiarnostjo: izkaže potrebo po pobudi EU ter razloge, zaradi katerih države članice ne morejo zbirati in uporabiti podatkov iz evidence imen letalskih potnikov?
As to subsidiarity: demonstrate the need for an EU initiative, and why the collection and use of PNR data cannot be achieved by the Member States?
Če dejansko obstaja potreba po ukrepih na ravni EU, zakaj se je Svet odločil, da ustvari le obveznost za države članice, da zberejo in uporabijo podatke iz evidence imen letalskih potnikov, ni pa vzpostavila pravega programa EU?
If there is a demonstrable need for EU action, why does the Council choose to merely create the obligation for Member States to collect and use PNR data, rather than set up a real EU scheme?
Ali Svet soglaša, da skupek 27 nacionalnih ureditev nima evropske dodane vrednosti in ustvarja pravno negotovost za državljane in letalske prevoznike?
Does the Council agree that a patchwork of 27 national regimes has no European added value and creates legal uncertainty for citizens and carriers?
V zvezi s sinergijo in splošno strukturo: razloži, kako zbiranje in uporaba podatkov iz evidenc imen letalskih potnikov na ravni EU ustrezata skladni strategiji in kako sta povezana z drugimi (predvidenimi) ukrepi EU za varnost na mejah, kot so sistem API, sistem vstopa in izstopa, elektronskega sistema za odobritev potovanj ter o izmenjavi podatkov, biometrija v potnih listih ter vizumi, sistema SIS in VIS ter nacionalni programi za varovanje meja, kot je e-borders/Semaphore Združenega kraljestva?
As to synergy and overall architecture: explain how the collection and use at EU level of PNR data fit with a coherent strategy and relate to other (envisaged) EU border security measures such as API, Entry-Exit, ESTA, biometrics in passports and visa, SIS, VIS, and national border protection schemes such as UK e-borders/Semaphore?
V zvezi s pravno varnostjo: razloži, kako se lahko podatki iz evidenc imen letalskih potnikov uporabijo za druge namene kot za kriminalitetno politiko (kot so denimo varnost letalstva, nadzor meja, schengensko sodelovanje, nezakonito priseljevanje in varovanje zdravja) brez pravne podlage Skupnosti (glej člen 47 PEU in mnenje pravne službe Sveta)?
As to legal certainty: explain how PNR data could be used for purposes other than criminal policy (such as aviation security, borders control, Schengen cooperation, illegal migration and health protection) without a Community legal basis (see Art. 47 of the TEU, and the Council Legal Service opinion)?
V zvezi z demokratičnim nadzorom: razloži, kako bo zagotovljen popoln parlamentarni nadzor na evropski in nacionalni ravni ter tudi, kako bodo organi za varstvo podatkov izvajali nadzor nad sistemom.
As to democratic control: explain how full parliamentary scrutiny at European and national level will be ensured and explain also how data protection authorities will exert control over the system?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0100/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0100/08
Ob upoštevanju, da bi EU in njene države članice morale ohraniti svojo tradicijo odprtih držav ter zagotoviti svobodo meddržavnega gibanja, kot jo določa člen 12.2 Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah iz leta 1966, lahko Komisija:
Bearing in mind that the EU and its Member States should preserve their tradition of being open countries and ensure freedom of transnational movement of persons as granted by Art. 12.2 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, can the Commission: