natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali obstajajo kategorije ljudi ali VIP, ki so lahko izvzete iz teh pravil, tudi kadar potujejo s komercialnimi leti?
Are there categories of persons or VIPs, also when flying on commercial flights, that can be exempted from these rules?
Ali bo Komisija pregledala ukrep, da se bo učila iz izkušenj pri njegovem izvajanju, in obravnavala omenjena vprašanja ter problem odvzema predmetov potnikom, ki potujejo čez ozemlje EU?
Will it review the measure, so as to learn from experience in its application and to tackle the aforementioned issues, as well as the problem of the seizure of items from travellers in transit on EU territory?
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, kdaj bo to storila?
If so, when?
Se strinja, da uporabljeni postopek komitologije ne omogoča ustreznega parlamentarnega in sodnega nadzora, kar je kršitev demokratičnih načel in evropskih standardov?
Does it agree that the comitology procedure applied does not allow for proper parliamentary and judicial control, in breach of democratic principles and European standards?
Kako bi po njenem mnenju odpravili te resne pomanjkljivosti?
What does it suggest in order to overcome such serious shortcomings?
UL L 271, 30.9.2006, str.
OJ L 271, 30.9.2006, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0004/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0004/07
Zadeva: Ena delnica - en glas
Subject: One share, one vote
Maja lansko leto je generalni direktorat za notranji trg objavil javni razpis za izvedbo zunanje študije o sorazmernosti med lastništvom in nadzorom v podjetjih, ki kotirajo na borzi v EU, bolj znane kot študija „ena delnica – en glas”.
In May, DG MARKT published a call for tender to carry out an external study on: 'Proportionality between ownership and control in EU listed companies', better known as the 'one share, one vote' study.
Izbrani so bili trije izvajalci: Sherman & Sterling, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) ter evropski inštitut za vodenje in obvladovanje družb (European Corporate Governance Institute).
The study was allocated jointly to Sherman & Sterling, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and the European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI).
Evropski parlament je v svojem poročilu o pravu družb, ki ga je sprejel julija ( A6-0229/2006 ),
In its report on Company Law adopted in July ( A6-0229/2006 ), the EP:
2. izrazil pričakovanje, da bo Komisija zakonodajni predlog o načelu „ena delnica – en glas“ pripravila šele po opravljeni reviziji Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/25/ES z dne 21. aprila 2004 o ponudbah za prevzem, kot je predvideno v členu 20 te direktive, in oceni te direktive (odstavek 43); ter
2. expected the Commission not to present any legislative proposal concerning the principle 'one share, one vote', before the outcome of the revision of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids, as provided for in Article 20 of that Directive, and an evaluation of that Directive (para 43); and
3. izrazil pričakovanje, da bo zunanja študija nepristranska analiza empiričnih in teoretičnih dokazov o učinkih, ki jih imajo različni lastniški modeli v državah članicah na gospodarsko učinkovitost, lastniški nadzor podjetij in možnosti za čezmejne transakcije, ter temeljita analiza prava družb, kar zadeva širši gospodarski in pravni položaj v državah članicah ter različne modele upravljanja podjetij.
3. expected the external study to be an objective analysis of the empirical and theoretical evidence regarding the effects of the different ownership models in the Member States on economic efficiency, owner-control of companies and the possibilities for cross-border transactions, and a sound analysis of corporate law as regards the wider economic and legal context in Member States and different models of corporate governance.
Poleg tega je treba pri pripravi stališča iz prve obravnave Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi z osnutkom direktive o glasovalnih pravicah delničarjev upoštevati tudi pomisleke in skrbi glede dejavnosti posrednikov in agencij za zbiranje pooblastil.
Also, in the preparation of the position at first reading of the European Parliament on the draft Directive on shareholders’ voting rights, concerns about the activities of intermediaries and proxy collecting agencies are an important consideration.
Ali je Komisija seznanjena z dejstvom, da
Is the Commission aware that
- je eden od izvajalcev, ISS, zdaleč največji pooblaščeni imetnik glasovalnih pravic na območju Združenih držav Amerike in Evropske unije?
- one of the contractors, ISS, is by far the largest proxy holder of voting rights active in the USA and in the European Union;
- je tretji izvajalec, Sherman & Sterling, odvetniška pisarna s sedežem v New Yorku;
- the third contractor, Sherman & Sterling, is a New York originated law firm;
- je bila vloga ISS pri združitvi družb Hewlett Packard in Compaq močno kritizirana zaradi navzkrižja interesov (svetovalne storitve, zbiranje pooblastil in pravno svetovanje) ter da je zvezni ameriški organ za nadzorovanje finančnih trgov SEC (Secrurities and Exchange Commission) v zvezi s tem primerom začel preiskavo;
- the role of ISS in the merger between Hewlett Packard and Compaq has been highly criticised in terms of conflict of interests (advisory services, proxy collecting, and legal advice) and that the US financial markets supervisor SEC has opened an enquiry into this case;
- ter da je ameriški zvezni vladni organ za finančni nadzor (General Accountability Office) 26. septembra 2006 najavil, da bo zaradi velike nevarnosti navzkrižja interesov in tržne prevlade začel preiskavo o zbiranju glasovalnih pravic, saj si večino trga delita dve družbi, ena od teh pa je ISS?
- and that the US General Accountability Office announced on 26th September 2006 that it would also open an enquiry on voter advice markets, due to the high risk of conflict of interest and market dominance, as two companies share most of the market, of which one is ISS?
Če je Komisija s tem seznanjena, kako ocenjuje ta dejstva glede na skrbi in pomisleke v zvezi z navzkrižjem interesov in preiskav v Združenih državah Amerike?
If yes, how does the Commission assess these facts in the light of the concerns about conflicts of interests and the enquiries in the USA?
Ali je Komisija prepričana, da so izbrani skupni izvajalci zunanje študije zares izpolnjevali zahtevane splošne kriterije neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti pri postopku oddaje naročila?
Is the Commission convinced that the joint contractors that were selected for the external study really meet the general criteria of independence and objectivity required in its procurement procedures?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0005/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0005/07
Zadeva: Omejitve EU glede tekočin, ki jih lahko potniki prinesejo na letalo
Subject: EU restrictions on liquids that passengers can carry on aircraft
Svet je nedavno sprejel Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1448/2006 o varnosti letalstva.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1448/2006 on aviation security was recently adopted by the Council.
Ta vsebuje tajno prilogo z omejevalnimi ukrepi glede tekočin, ki jih lahko potniki prinesejo na letalo v svoji ročni prtljagi.
It contains a secret annex with restrictive measures on liquids that passengers are allowed to carry on aircraft in their hand luggage.
Kako lahko opraviči odločitev o varovanju tajnosti norm, ki imajo zavezujoč učinek na posameznike, s katero se krši demokratično načelo o javnem značaju zakonov?
What is the justification for keeping secret a rule having binding effects on individuals in breach of the democratic principle of publicity of laws?
S katerimi postopki je mogoče spodbijati določeno odločitev?
What are the procedures provided to contest a decision?
Katera pravna sredstva so predvidena?
What are the provisions for legal remedy?
Lahko Komisija z dejstvi in statističnimi podatki utemelji učinkovitost in sorazmernost teh ukrepov?
Can the Commission argue with facts and statistics that those measures are effective and proportionate?
Ali bo Evropska komisija ocenila učinkovitost in praktične posledice tega ukrepa za posameznike ter o tem obvestila javnost in Evropski parlament?
Will the Commission evaluate the efficiency and the practical consequences of the measure on individuals and inform the public and the EP?
Ali bo Komisija ponovno preučila ta ukrep, in če je odgovor pritrdilen, kdaj namerava to storiti?
Will the Commission review the measure and if so, when?
Kaj Komisija predlaga v zvezi z odpravljanjem pomanjkljivosti uporabljenega postopka komitologije?
What does the Commission suggest to overcome the shortcomings of the comitology procedure applied?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0007/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0007/07
Svet je sprejel uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1448/2006 o letalski varnosti, ki vsebuje tajno prilogo z omejevalnimi ukrepi glede tekočin, ki jih potniki lahko prinesejo na letalo v ročni prtljagi.
The Council has adopted Commission Regulation (EC) No 1448/2006 on aviation security containing a secret annex with restrictive measures on liquids that passengers are allowed to carry on aircraft in their hand luggage.
Ali lahko Komisija s primeri pojasni:
Can the Commission explain and illustrate:
Kako lahko tajna priloga upošteva demokratično načelo javnosti zakonov?
How can the secrecy of the annex comply with the democratic principle of publicity of the laws?
Katere kazni se uporabljajo v primeru zavrnitve ali kršitve pravil?
What sanctions are applied in the event of refusal to follow or breach of the rules?
Kako se bo preprečila samovoljnost pri praktičnem izvajanju tajnega predpisa in njegovih izjem?
How is it intended to avoid arbitrariness in the practical implementation of a secret rule and its exceptions?
Ali besedilo predvideva pravico potnika do obveščenosti in do pritožbe?
Does this text provide for the right for information and the right of appeal of the passenger?
Kako lahko potniki v zračnem prometu spodbijajo odločbe in sankcije, sprejete na podlagi novih pravil o ročni prtljagi, na kraju samem ali kasneje, in se poučijo o pravnih sredstvih?
How can airline passengers contest decisions and sanctions taken on the basis of the new hand luggage rules, on the spot or at a later stage, and look for legal remedy?
S čim Komisija upravičuje te ukrepe?
What is the justification for the measures?
Ali je Komisija ovrednotila podatke in dokaze, ki so jih predstavile tajne službe Združenega kraljestva, ko so zahtevale te omejitve?
Did the Commission carry out an evaluation of information and evidence presented by the United Kingdom's secret services upon requesting these restrictions?
Ali so bila pred odločitvijo opravljena posvetovanja s specializiranimi strokovnjaki?
Has specialised expertise been gathered before the decision?
Ali ukrepi temeljijo na ustreznih ocenah tveganja in ali bodo pripomogli k ustreznemu zmanjšanju ogrožanja varnosti?
Are the measures based on proper risk assessment and will they yield an appropriate reduction of security risks?
Ali bodo ocenjeni po njihovi uvedbi?
Will they be evaluated after implementation?
Ali je bila opravljena presoja vplivov teh ukrepov na temeljne pravice?
Have these measures been subject to an impact assessment on fundamental rights?
Ali se je ugotovilo, da so združljivi z državljanskimi pravicami ter s prostim pretokom oseb in blaga?
Have they been deemed compatible with citizens’ rights and the free movement of persons and goods?
Zaradi katerih razlogov ti ukrepi veljajo za sorazmerne in potrebne v demokratični družbi ter za skladne z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah?
On what grounds are these measures to be considered proportionate and necessary in a democratic society, in compliance with the European Convention of Human Rights?
Ali je bila opravljena presoja vplivov teh ukrepov na pravice potrošnikov in praktičnih vplivov na delovanje letališč in pretok potnikov?
Have these measures been subject to an impact assessment on consumer rights and the practical impact on airport operations and passenger flows?
Ali obstajajo predhodne presoje dodatnih stroškov, s katerimi bodo obremenjeni potrošniki in letališča po uvedbi novih pravil?
Was there any prior assessment of the extra costs consumers and airports will face after the implementation of the new rules?
Pravila na področju varnosti letalstva opredeljuje odbor za varnost letalstva, ustanovljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 2320/2002 .
The aviation security implementing rules are developed by the Aviation Security Regulatory Committee, established in Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 .
Ta odbor dobiva zunanje nasvete samo od svetovalne skupine zainteresiranih strani za varnost letalstva (SAGAS), ki je neformalno telo zainteresiranih strani iz letalske industrije.
This committee only gets external advice from the Stakeholder Advisory Group on Aviation Security (SAGAS), an informal body of aviation industry stakeholders.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da mora biti ta organ formaliziran, kot je Parlament zahteval med prvo obravnavo revizije Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002, ki še vedno traja?
Would the Commission agree that this body needs to be formalised, as requested by Parliament during the first reading of the ongoing revision of Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002?
Ali bi Komisija sprejela zamisel, da mora odbor tudi sistematično upoštevati ustrezno strokovno znanje o državljanskih pravicah in interesih potrošnikov?
Would the Commission accept the idea that the committee also needs to systematically take into account appropriate expertise on civil rights and consumer interests?
UL L 355, 30.12.2002, str.
OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0008/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0008/07
Zadeva: Neširjenje jedrskega orožja in razorožitev - posodobitev britanskega sistema Trident je nezdružljiva z NPT
Subject: Nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament - modernisation of UK Trident incompatible with NPT
Marca 2007 bo parlament Združenega kraljestva glasoval o spornem načrtu širitve in posodobitve sistema jedrske oborožitve Trident, s katerim razpolaga država.
In March 2007 the UK Parliament will vote on a controversial plan to extend and modernise the country's possession of its nuclear weapon arsenal, Trident.
Decembra 2006 je vlada podrobno pojasnila svoje razloge za ohranitev jedrske oborožitve Združenega kraljestva v 40 strani dolgi beli knjigi „Prihodnost jedrskih sredstev odvračanja Združenega kraljestva“, v kateri zagovarja stališče, da lahko država odvrača grožnje z jedrskim orožjem v prihodnosti le tako, da še naprej razpolaga z jedrskim orožjem.
In December 2006 the Government detailed its case for extending the UK's nuclear posture in a 40-page white paper, 'the Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear Deterrent', in which it is argued that the UK can only deter nuclear weapon threats in the future through the continued possession of nuclear weapons.
Ali bo Svet v času pred srečanjem odbora za pripravo Pogodbe o neširjenju jedrskega orožja (NPT) na Dunaju, v marcu in aprilu 2007, vzpostavil dialog z vlado Združenega kraljestva glede tega, da lahko omenjeni britanski načrti predstavljajo kršitev člena VI Pogodbe o neširjenju jedrskega orožja iz leta 1968, ki VB in druge države z jedrskim orožjem zavezuje k delovanju v smeri jedrske razorožitve, ter neizpolnjevanje obljube o „nedvoumnih prizadevanjih ... da bi se doseglo popolno uničenje njihovih jedrskih oborožitev“, ki so jo te države z jedrskim orožjem dale na revizijski konferenci NPT leta 2000?
In the run-up to the NPT Prepcom in Vienna in March/April 2007, will the Council establish a dialogue with the UK Government regarding the fact that these British plans are alleged to be a violation of Article VI of the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty, which obliges the UK and the other nuclear weapon states to work towards nuclear disarmament, as well as a breach of the pledge made in 2000 at the NPT Review Conference by these nuclear weapon states to 'an unequivocal undertaking ... to accomplish the total elimination of their nuclear arsenals'?
Ali Svet podpira izjavo, ki jo je 28. novembra 2006 podal takratni generalni sekretar Združenih narodov Kofi Annan, in sicer, da bi jedrsko orožje v lasti nekaterih lahko druge spodbudilo k pridobivanju takšnega orožja: „s tem, da se oklepajo svojih oborožitev in jih posodabljajo, ... države z jedrskim orožjem spodbujajo druge, ... da jedrsko orožje obravnavajo kot bistveno tako za svojo varnost kot za svoj status“?
Does the Council endorse the statement, made by the then UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 28 November 2006 that the retention of nuclear weapons by some might motivate others to acquire such arms: 'by clinging to and modernising their own arsenals ... nuclear-weapon states encourage others ... to regard nuclear weapons as essential, both to their security and to their status'?
Ali se Svet strinja s prepričanjem, da posodobitev britanske in francoske jedrske oborožitve ter to, da ZDA ne umaknejo svojega jedrskega orožja z evropskih ozemelj, ovira razvoj, uporabo in učinkovitost evropske strategije proti širjenju orožja za množično uničevanje?
Does the Council share the conviction that the modernisation of British and French nuclear arsenals, as well as the non-withdrawal of US nuclear weapons from European territories, hinders the evolution, application and efficiency of the European Strategy against Weapons of Mass Destruction?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0009/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0009/07
, v imenu skupine UEN ,
, on behalf of the UEN Group,
Zadeva: Neširjenje jedrskega orožja in razorožitev - odbor za pripravo NPT, 30. april - 11. maj 2007
Subject: Nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament - NPT prepcom, 30 April - 11 May 2007
V EU, vključno z Evropskim parlamentom, obstaja prepričljivo soglasje za oživitev in okrepitev pogodbe o neširjenju jedrskega orožja (NPT).
There is an overwhelming consensus within the EU, including the European Parliament, on reviving and strengthening the NPT.
Zaradi tega je osrednjega pomena, da se EU pripravi na revizijsko konferenco leta 2010 s predstavitvijo pozitivnega in prepoznavnega prispevka na prvem odboru za pripravo, ki se bo sestal na Dunaju od 30. aprila do 11. maja 2007.
For that reason it is vital that the EU prepares itself for the 2010 Review Conference by presenting a positive and visible contribution to the first Prepcom which will take place in Vienna from 30 April - 11 May, 2007.
Kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Svet za krepitev pogodbe o neširjenju jedrskega orožja (NPT) in v prizadevanjih za učinkoviti multilateralizem, kot je navedeno v strategiji EU proti širjenju snovi in orožja za množično uničevanje iz decembra 2003?
What steps is the Council going to undertake to strengthen the Non-Proliferation Treaty and to pursue effective multilateralism as stated in the December 2003 EU Strategy against the proliferation of materials and weapons of mass destruction?
Ali je bil – navkljub propadu revizijske konference o NPT leta 2005 – dosežen kakršenkoli napredek pri izvajanju 41 ukrepov, sprejetih v skupnem stališču EU o NPT?
Despite the failure of the 2005 NPT Review conference, what progress – if any – has been made to implement the 41 measures adopted in the EU Common Position on the NPT?
Kakšna je lahko posebna vloga Sveta pri izvajanju teh ukrepov?
What can be the particular role of the Council in implementing these measures?
Kakšni so ukrepi Sveta za pripravo na srečanje odbora za pripravo NPT na Dunaju?
What steps is the Council taking to prepare the Vienna NPT Prepcom?
Za katere nove obveznosti si bo prizadeval Svet?
What new commitments does the Council hope to achieve?
Katere konkretne razorožitvene cilje, kot je na primer napredek pri 13 ukrepih, o katerih je bil dogovor dosežen ob koncu revizijske konference o NPT leta 1995 (in potrjen leta 2000), bo Svet podpiral na odboru za pripravo; in še posebej, kaj lahko stori Svet za odpravo zastoja pri oblikovanju pogodbe o prepovedi proizvodnje cepljivih snovi, ki bi jo bilo mogoče preverjati?
What concrete disarmament objectives will the Council promote at the Prepcom, such as progress on the 13 steps agreed at the end of the 1995 (and confirmed in 2000) NPT Review conference; and in particular what can the Council do to break the deadlock on establishing a verifiable Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty?
Henryjem Kissingerjem, da smo „na robu prepada v novo in nevarno jedrsko obdobje“ ter da je edini način, s katerim lahko preprečimo zdrs v prepad, oblikovanje globalnega soglasja, ki bo ponovno uveljavilo „vizijo sveta brez jedrskega orožja“, in „zavzeto“ delovanje za ta cilj?
Does the Council agree with Dr Henry Kissinger that we are on the 'precipice of a new and dangerous nuclear era' and that the only way to prevent us falling over is by building a global consensus that reasserts the 'vision of a world free of nuclear weapons' and to work 'energetically' to that end?
Ali bo Svet v okviru odnosov EU-ZDA podprl sprožitev vprašanje jedrskega sporazuma ZDA-Indija ter njegovih posledic za Mednarodno agencijo za jedrsko energijo (IAEA) in Skupino držav dobaviteljic jedrskega blaga (NSG)?
Will the Council support the EU in the framework of EU-US relations to raise the issue of the US-India nuclear agreement and its consequences for the IAEA and the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0011/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0011/07
Zadeva: Napad na Galino Kozlovo, članico upravnega odbora nacionalne organizacije Mari Ušem in urednico literarne revije Ontšõko
Subject: The attack on Galina Kozlova, member of the board of the Mari national organisation Mari Ušem and editor of the literary magazine Ontšõko
25. januarja zvečer je bila v glavnem mestu marijske republike Ruske federacije, Joškar-Olasu, brutalno napadena Galina Kozlova, žena Vladimirja Kozlova, predsednika marijskega sveta in kandidata za nagrado Saharova za leto 2006.
On the evening of 25 January in the capital of the Mari Republic (Mari El) of the Russian Federation, Joškar-Olas, Galina Kozlova, the wife of Vladimir Kozlov, chair of the Mari council and a candidate for the 2006 Sakharov prize, was brutally attacked.
Kozlova je še vedno v bolnišnici zaradi poškodb obraza in poškodovanega vida.
Kozlova remains in hospital and is suffering from facial injuries as well as impaired vision.
Evropski parlament je sprejel resolucijo ( P6_TA(2005)0185 ) o kršitvah človekovih pravic in demokracije v marijski republiki Ruske federacije spomladi 2005.
The European Parliament adopted a resolution ( P6_TA(2005)0185 ) on breaches of human rights and democracy in the Mari Republic (Mari El) of the Russian Federation in the spring of 2005.
Vodje marijskega ljudstva so izredno pogosto napadeni, kar dokazuje dejstvo, da je bil 26. avgusta 2005 pretepen Vasilij Petrov, predsednik ugrofinskega mladinskega združenja.
The leaders of Mari people are attacked extraordinarily often, as the beating of Vassili Petrov, president of the youth association of the Finno-Ugric people, on 26 August 2005 proves.
Zgoraj navedena dejstva dokazujejo nenehno zlorabo človekovih pravic in pravic malih narodov v Ruski federaciji.
The facts provided above prove the constant abuse of human rights and the rights of small nations in the Russian Federation.
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti za izboljšanje položaja človekovih pravic in manjšin v Rusiji, zlasti v republiki Mari El?
What is the Commission going to do to improve the situation of human rights and minorities in Russia, especially in Mari El?
Zakaj Komisija ni pripravljena obravnavati te problematike v rednem dialogu o človekovih pravicah med EU in Rusijo?
Why is the Commission reluctant to raise the issue during the regular EU-Russia human rights dialogue?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0012/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0012/07
, v imenu skupine ITS
, on behalf of the ITS Group
Svet je sprejel Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1546/2006 o letalski varnosti, ki vsebuje tajno prilogo z omejevalnimi ukrepi glede tekočin, ki jih potniki lahko prinesejo na letalo v svoji ročni prtljagi.
The Council has adopted Commission Regulation (EC) No 1546/2006 on aviation security containing a secret annex with restrictive measures on liquids that passengers are allowed to carry on aircraft in their hand luggage.