natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- novi civilni zakonik ustvarja pravno negotovost in navzkrižje med odstavki (1), (2) in (3) člena 277 na eni strani ter odstavkom (4) tega člena na drugi strani, saj bi se lahko izničila uporaba člena 2 Direktive 2004/38/ES, v katerem so opredeljeni družinski člani (med katere sodi tudi zakonec), in člena 3 te direktive glede obveznosti, da se olajša vstop in prebivanje, ali pa bi se lahko ta člena uporabila tako, da se istospolni zakonci ali partnerji in partnerji nasprotnega spola ne bi mogli prosto gibati?
- the new Civil Code creates a situation of legal uncertainty and contradiction between Article 277(1), (2) and (3) RCC on the one hand, and Article 277(4) RCC on the other, as the application of Article 2 of Directive 2004/38/EC defining family members (which includes ‘spouse’) and of Article 3 on the duty of facilitation of entry and residence could be nullified or applied in such a way as to deny free movement of same-sex spouses and partners and of opposite-sex partners, on the basis of the recognition prohibition?
- so te določbe v nasprotju z vrednotami in duhom ustanovnih pogodb ter načelom enakosti in nediskriminacije, poleg tega pa lahko ustvarijo nestrpno in homofobno vzdušje ter lahko povečajo napetost in negativno vplivajo na pravico do prostega gibanja državljanov EU, tudi Romunov, v Evropski uniji?
- these provisions are contrary to the values and spirit of the Treaties and of the principle of equality and non-discrimination and risk creating an intolerant and homophobic climate, as well as further tensions on, and repercussions for, the right to free movement of EU citizens, including Romanians, in the EU?
(2) Istospolne zakonske zveze, ki so bile sklenjene v tujini med romunskimi ali tujimi državljani, v Romuniji niso priznane.
(2) Same-sex marriages concluded or contracted abroad, either by Romanian or foreign citizens, are not recognized in Romania.
(3) Civilne partnerske skupnosti med osebami nasprotnega ali istega spola, ki so bile sklenjene v tujini med romunskimi ali tujimi državljani, v Romuniji niso priznane.
(3) Civil partnerships between persons of the opposite sex or same sex, concluded or contracted abroad, either by Romanian or foreign citizens, are not recognized in Romania.
(4) Pravne določbe o prostem gibanju državljanov iz držav članic EU in Evropskega gospodarskega prostora v Romuniji še vedno veljajo.“
(4) Legal provisions on free movement of citizens in Romania, for citizens from EU Member States and from the European Economic Area, remain applicable.’
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000268/2011
Question for oral answer O-000268/2011
Ali bo Komisija sprožila postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev proti Romuniji, da bi zagotovila spoštovanje direktive v celoti, njeno izvajanje brez diskriminacije zaradi spolne usmerjenosti ter dosledno spoštovanje temeljnih pravic državljanov?
Will the Commission begin infringement proceedings against Romania to ensure that the directive is fully respected and applied without discrimination based on sexual orientation, and that citizens’ fundamental rights are fully respected?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000269/2011
Question for oral answer O-000269/2011
Subvencije EU na področju kmetijstva, kohezijske politike, prometa, energije in ribištva imajo lahko nenamerne škodljive vplive na okolje.
EU subsidies in the fields of agriculture, cohesion policy, transport, energy and fisheries may have unintended harmful effects in the environment.
Okolju škodljive subvencije so bile v zadnjih letih predmet številnih raziskav.
A number of studies have examined environmentally harmful subsidies in recent years.
Iz opredelitve OECD sledi, da v sicer enakih okoliščinah [okolju škodljiva] subvencija povečuje pridobivanje/rabo naravnega vira, in tako zvišuje raven s tem povezanih odpadkov, onesnaževanja in izkoriščanja naravnih virov.
Based on the OECD definition, ‘All other things being equal, the [environmentally harmful] subsidy increases the levels of output/use of a natural resource and therefore increases the level of waste, pollution and natural exploitation to those connected’.
V študiji, objavljeni februarja 2011, ki jo je naročil Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane, so poudarjeni negativni okoljski vplivi ključnih proračunskih postavk številnih sektorskih politik EU.
A study requested by Parliament’s Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and published in February 2011 has highlighted the negative impacts on the environment of key budget items in several EU sectoral policies.
Ta raziskava kaže, da bi morale institucije EU natančno oceniti posredne in neposredne vplive sedanjih subvencij EU ter začeti njihovo reformo.
This study suggests that EU institutions should assess in depth the direct and indirect effects of the current EU subsidy framework and proceed to reform it.
Svet v sklepih z dne 20. decembra 2010 ponavlja zahtevo, ki jo je že pred časom naslovil na Komisijo, naj predloži časovni načrt za odpravo subvencij, ki zelo negativno vplivajo na okolje, da bi lahko spremljali napredek in o njem še naprej redno poročali tudi po letu 2011, upoštevajoč strategijo Evropa 2020.
The Council conclusions of 20 December 2010 reiterated the Council’s ‘longstanding invitation to the Commission to present a roadmap for the removal of subsidies that have considerable negative effects on the environment so as to allow the monitoring and further regular reporting on progress from 2011 onwards, taking into account the Europe 2020 Strategy’.
Kljub temu je še vedno treba narediti veliko, da bi izboljšali vzdržnost proračuna EU in usklajenost politik EU.
Nevertheless there is still a lot to do to achieve a more sustainable EU budget and to increase the coherence of EU policies.
- Na kakšni stopnji je trenutno delo Komisije pri izvajanju celovite analize orodja za reformo okolju škodljivih subvencij iz zadevnih postavk proračuna?
- What is the state of play of the Commission’s work in carrying out a full environmentally harmful subsidies reform tool analysis of the critical budget titles?
- Kdaj namerava Komisija predložiti jasne in dobro utemeljene predloge za odstranitev dejavnikov, ki niso vzdržni, iz proračuna EU?
- When does the Commission plan to provide clear and well-founded propositions to remove unsustainable elements from the EU budget?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000270/2011
Question for oral answer O-000270/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Položaj palestinskih zapornikov v Izraelu, ki gladovno stavkajo
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Situation of Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike in Israel
V členu 119 četrte ženevske konvencije, ki jo je podpisal tudi Izrael, je navedeno, da je neprekinjena izolacija zapornika, ki traja več kot trideset dni, nelegalna ne glede na kršitev in tudi v primerih, ko je zapornik do obravnave njegovega primera zagrešil več prekrškov, ki so med seboj lahko povezani ali ne.
Article 119 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, to which Israel is a signatory, establishes that it is unlawful for a prisoner to be held in solitary confinement for over thirty consecutive days, regardless of the offence committed and even if he is answerable for several alleged incidents when his case is dealt with, whether they are connected or not.
Člen 116 določa tudi pravico zapornika do obiskov, zlasti bližnjih sorodnikov.
Article 116 also establishes that every prisoner has the right to receive visitors, especially near relatives.
28. septembra 2011 je več kot 5000 Palestincev (med katerimi so ženske, otroci in politični predstavniki, tudi poslanci, od katerih velja omeniti Marvana Bargutija in Ahmeda Sadata), ki so zaprti v Izraelu, začelo gladovno stavko, s katero obsojajo izolacijo zapornikov in slabšanje pogojev v zaporu.
Since 28 September, over 5000 Palestinians detained in Israel (including women, children and political representatives, and in particular members of parliament such as Marwan Barghouti and Ahmed Saadat) have gone on hunger strike in protest against solitary confinement and the worsening of the conditions in which they are being detained.
Uprava zaporov je določila težke kazni in ukrepe brez primere, s čimer je sprožila zavračanje in proteste ter zapornike prisilila v upor proti vsem veljavnim pravilom v okupacijskih zaporih.
The prison authorities have imposed severe penalties and unprecedented measures, provoking prisoners to express their rejection and protest by rebelling against all the rules in force in the prisons operated by the Occupying power.
Ali namerava Svet obsoditi izraelsko vlado in od nje ponovno zahtevati spoštovanje resolucij Združenih narodov ter četrte ženevske konvencije, v nasprotnem primeru pa zamrzniti pridružitveni sporazum z Evropsko unijo?
Does the Council intend to condemn the Government of Israel and demand yet again that it comply with United Nations resolutions and the Fourth Geneva Convention, failing which the Association Agreement with the European Union could be suspended?
Ali namerava od Izraela zahtevati takojšnjo izpustitev vseh poslancev in zapornikov, ki so bili zaprti pred sporazumi iz Osla, ter spoštovanje pravic zapornikov?
Does the Council intend to demand that Israel immediately release all members of parliament and other detainees imprisoned before the Oslo Agreements and respect prisoners’ rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000271/2011
Question for oral answer O-000271/2011
Ali namerava Komisija oceniti, ali so razmere, v katerih živijo palestinski zaporniki, skladne s spoštovanjem človekovih pravic glede na dejstvo, da člen 2 pridružitvenega sporazuma med EU in Izraelom določa, da njuni odnosi temeljijo na spoštovanju človekovih pravic in demokratičnih načel, ki vodijo njuno notranjo in mednarodno politiko, kar je bistvena prvina tega sporazuma?
Given that Article 2 of the European Union-Israel Association Agreement states that relations between the European Union and Israel shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles, which guides their domestic and international policies and constitutes an essential element of that Agreement, does the Commission not intend to ascertain whether the conditions in which Palestinian prisoners are being detained are compatible with respect for human rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000272/2011
Question for oral answer O-000272/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Pravice otrok v EU
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Children's rights in the EU
Komisija je 15. februarja 2011 objavila sporočilo "Agenda EU za otrokove pravice", v katerem so opisani ukrepi, ki jih bo Komisija sprejela v prihodnjih letih za okrepitev pravic otrok.
On 15 February 2011, the Commission issued a Communication entitled ‘an EU Agenda for the Rights of the Child’, which illustrates the actions that the Commission will adopt in the upcoming years to strengthen children’s rights.
Predvidenih je enajst zakonodajnih ukrepov in ukrepov politike na področjih civilnega in kazenskega pravosodja, ranljivih otrok, otrok v zunanjepolitičnih dejavnostih EU ter sodelovanja otrok in ozaveščanja, s čimer se bo zagotovilo boljše varstvo pravic otrok v EU.
Eleven legislative and policy actions in the fields of civil and criminal justice, vulnerable children, children in the EU’s external action and children’s participation and awareness-raising are foreseen, which will ensure a better protection of children’s rights in the EU.
Ali lahko Svet opiše svoje stališče o Agendi in navede, kako bo zagotovil:
Can the Council illustrate its position on the Agenda and how it will ensure that:
- da bodo organi držav članic bolj učinkovito in neprizanesljivo preiskovali nasilje nad otroki in zlorabo otrok in da imuniteta pred kazenskim pregonom ne bo dovoljena v nobenem primeru?
- more effective and forceful inquiries into violence against children and child abuse are carried out by Member States’ authorities, and that immunity from prosecution is not allowed in any case?
- prepoved pridržanja otrok in uvedbo primernih nadomestnih ukrepov?
- detention of children is prohibited and appropriate and alternative measures are implemented?
- dostop do izobrazbe, socialnih in zdravstvenih storitev ter pravosodja za vse otroke?
- all children are granted access to education, social and medical services and justice?
- pomoč posebnim skupinam otrok v posebej težkih razmerah s posebnimi podpornimi politikami (Romi, mladoletniki brez spremstva ali mladoletniki, ki so bili ločeni od družine, otroci priseljencev, otroci, ki živijo v revščini itd.)?
- special categories of children in particularly difficult situations are assisted with special support policies (Roma, unaccompanied or separated minors, migrants’ children, children in poverty, etc.)?
- priznavanje osebnega stanja otrok pri potovanjih znotraj EU po načelu vzajemnega priznavanja brez diskriminacije zaradi osebnega stanja staršev, vrste odnosa med njima (zakonska zveza, registrirana zunajzakonska skupnost itd.) ali njune spolne usmerjenosti?
- children’s civil status when travelling in the EU is recognised on the basis of the mutual recognition principle, without discrimination based on the civil status of the parent or of the type of relationship (marriage, civil union, etc.) or of their sexual orientation?
- uvedbo in delovanje opozorilnega sistema ob izginotju otroka in posebne klicne številke 116 000?
- a EU child alert mechanism and 116 000 hotline are implemented and operational?
- spodbujanje kulture dialoga z otroki, vključno z dialogom v družini?
- a culture of dialogue with children is promoted, including in the family?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000273/2011
Question for oral answer O-000273/2011
Predvidenih je enajst zakonodajnih ukrepov in ukrepov politike na področjih civilnega in kazenskega pravosodja, ranljivih otrok, otrok v zunanjepolitičnih dejavnostih EU ter sodelovanja otrok in ozaveščanja, s čimer se bo zagotovila boljše varstvo pravic otrok v EU.
Eleven legislative and policy actions in the fields of civil and criminal justice, vulnerable children, children in the EU’s external action and children’s participation and awareness-raising are foreseen, which will ensure a better protection of children’s rights in the EU.
Ali lahko Komisija bolj podrobno opiše, kako bo zagotovila:
Can the Commission illustrate in more detail what it will do to ensure that:
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000274/2011
Question for oral answer O-000274/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Diskriminacija in preganjanje Romov v državah članicah EU ter okvirna strategija, smernice in ukrepi EU
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Discrimination against, and persecution of, Roma in EU Member States and EU framework strategy, guidelines and actions
Kljub okviru EU za nacionalne strategije vključevanja Romov, ki ga je uvedla Evropska komisija, Svet pa pozdravil, in kljub smernicam za države članice glede oblikovanja nacionalnih strategij vključevanja Romov, ki jih je prav tako izdala Komisija, se diskriminacija in preganjanje Romov v EU in njenih državah članicah nadaljujeta.
Notwithstanding the EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies launched by the Commission and welcomed by the Council and the issuing by the European Commission of guidelines addressed to Member States for the formulation of the National Roma Integration Strategies (NRIS), discrimination against, and persecution of, Roma in the EU and its Member States is still taking place.
Na Madžarskem so v parlamentu julija sprejeli načrt, da morajo vse osebe, ki prejemajo socialni dodatek, delati na gradbiščih, čistiti ceste ali vzdrževati parke in gozdove.
In Hungary, a plan approved by the Hungarian Parliament last July requires anyone receiving a social allowance to work on construction sites, clean the streets or maintain parks and forests.
V primeru zavrnitve se dodatek ukine.
In the event of refusal, the allowances would be stopped.
Ukrep je predmet ostrih kritik, saj nesorazmerno prizadene Rome.
This measure has been harshly criticised as it affects Roma people disproportionately.
Na severu Češke republike so več tednov potekali neredi, podobni pogromom, med desničarskimi skrajneži in novo naseljenimi Romi , medtem ko so v češkem senatu zatrdili, da Češka republika ne bi smela sodelovati pri evropski strategiji za Rome.
Pogrom-like riots between right-wing extremists and newly-settled Roma in Northern Bohemia have been taking place for weeks in the Czech Republic , while the Czech Senate has affirmed that the Czech Republic should not participate in the European strategy on Roma.
V Bolgariji je zaradi umora dveh oseb, ki so ga zlorabila ekstremistična, populistična in nacionalistična gibanja, prišlo do demonstracij in nasilnega govora ter dejanj zoper Rome, tako da so morale oblasti pozvati k prekinitvi sovražnega govora.
In Bulgaria, demonstrations and violent language and acts against Roma took place following the murder of two people, which were misused by extremist, populist and nationalist movements, leading the authorities to call for an end to the language of hatred.
Pregoni Romov še vedno potekajo, tako je nedavno do njih prišlo v Rimu (Italija), Parizu (Francija) in Baia Mare (Romunija), zaradi česar so nevladne organizacije organe in Evropsko komisijo nemudoma pozvale k ukrepanju.
Evictions of Roma are still taking place, as happened recently in Rome (Italy), Paris (France), Baia Mare (Romania), which have led NGOs to urgently call on the authorities and the European Commission to act.
Ali Svet lahko razloži, zakaj smernice ne vključujejo ukrepov za človekove pravice in protidiskriminacijskih ukrepov, v nasprotju s tem, kar je v svojem poročilu zahteval Evropski parlament?
Can the Council explain why the guidelines do not include human rights and anti-discrimination measures, contrary to what the EP had requested in its report?
Ali lahko opiše, kateri ukrepi so bili in še bodo sprejeti, da bi zaustavili omenjene kršitve človekovih pravic ter diskriminacijske zakone in politike?
Can it illustrate what actions have been - and will be - taken to ensure that the abovementioned human rights violations and discriminatory laws and policies are stopped?
Ali Svet lahko pojasni, kako namerava zagotoviti, da bodo države članice spoštovale človekove pravice in protidiskriminacijska pravila glede Romov?
Can the Council illustrate how it will ensure that Member States respect human rights and anti-discrimination rules in relation to Roma?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000275/2011
Question for oral answer O-000275/2011
Ali Komisija lahko razloži, zakaj smernice ne vključujejo ukrepov za človekove pravice in protidiskriminacijskih ukrepov, v nasprotju s tem, kar je v svojem poročilu zahteval Evropski parlament?
Can the Commission explain why the guidelines do not include human rights and anti-discrimination measures, contrary to what the EP had requested in its report?
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni, kako namerava zagotoviti, da bodo države članice spoštovale človekove pravice in protidiskriminacijska pravila glede Romov?
Can the Commission illustrate how it will ensure that Member States respect human rights and anti-discrimination rules in relation to Roma?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000276/2011
Question for oral answer O-000276/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Odpravljanje pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju testa MSP
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Addressing the shortcomings of SME test implementation
V Aktu za mala podjetja je zapisano, da je za Komisijo obvezno, države članice pa so pozvane, da „strogo ocenijo vpliv prihodnjih zakonodajnih in upravnih pobud o MSP („MSP test“) in upoštevajo ustrezne rezultate pri sestavljanju predlogov“.
The Small Business Act states that the Commission will, and that the Member States are invited to, ‘…rigorously assess the impact of forthcoming legislative and administrative initiatives on SMEs (‘SME test’) and take relevant results into account when designing proposals.’
Pomen testa je še dodatno poudarjen zaradi gospodarske in finančne krize.
The importance of the test has been further underlined following the economic and financial crisis.
Nedavna študija Evropskega parlamenta o ovirah in najboljši praksi pri izvajanju testa MSP („Barriers and Best Practices in SME Test Implementation“, 2011) je pokazala številne pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je treba odpraviti na ravni držav članic in na ravni EU.
A recent study by the European Parliament (‘Barriers and Best Practices in SME Test Implementation’, 2011) indicates that the implementation of the SME test has various shortcomings that need to be addressed both at Member State and EU level.
Iz študije je razvidno, da šest držav članic testa ali ocen učinka ne uporablja, v drugih šestih državah nekakšen test sicer obstaja, vendar se ne uporablja dosledno.
It shows that six Member States have no test or impact assessment and a further six use some kind of test, but on an irregular basis.
Poleg tega države članice, ki izvajajo test MSP, uporabljajo različne metode, zato testi niso enako kakovostni.
Furthermore, those Member States that implement the SME test apply different methods; hence the quality of the tests differs.
Dodatna težava za naprednejše države članice in Komisijo je tudi kakovost testov MSP, ki je med vladnimi službami različna.
Both the more advanced Member States and the Commission also face challenges with varying quality in the SME test across all government services.
Komisija in naprednejše države članice imajo smernice za teste MSP, vendar študija opozarja na neskladja med posameznimi vladnimi službami.
While the Commission and more advanced Member States have guidelines for SME tests, the study observes a lack of compliance across all government services.
Službe Komisije v ocenah učinka dosledno uporabljajo test MSP, vendar smernice puščajo manevrski prostor, zaradi katerega se vsebina in kakovost spreminjata.
The Commission services use the SME test consistently in their impact assessments, but the guidelines allow room for variation in content and quality.
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila doslednejše izvajanje testa MSP v vseh državah članicah?
How will the Commission ensure that the SME test is applied by all Member States and in a more consistent manner?
Ali se Komisija strinja s priporočilom, da bi moral biti test MSP obvezen, če zakonodajni predlog zadeva MSP, in sicer na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni?
Does the Commission agree with the recommendation that the SME test should be mandatory if a legislative proposal will affect SMEs, both at EU and national level?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti doslednejšo kakovost pri svojih testih MSP?
How does the Commission intend to ensure more consistent quality in its SME tests?
Ali meni, da bi bilo primerno uvesti natančnejše smernice ali zunanji nadzor kakovosti?
Would the Commission consider more specific guidelines or external quality control?
Ali bi morale postati smernice za test MSP obvezne, saj se jih naprednejše države in Komisija ne držijo?
Given the lack of compliance with the guidelines for the SME test in more advanced Member States and the Commission, should the guidelines be mandatory?
S katerimi ukrepi namerava Komisija izboljšati dostop do kakovostnih podatkov za količinsko določanje pričakovanih vplivov na MSP?
Which measures is the Commission going to take to improve access to high quality data in order to quantify expected impacts on SMEs?
Ali se je Komisija zaradi večje preglednosti pripravljena zavezati, da bo v ocenah učinka poročala o vseh rezultatih in postopkih testov MSP?
In order to increase transparency, would the Commission be ready to commit to reporting the results and procedures for each SME test in its impact assessments?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000277/2011
Question for oral answer O-000277/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Prispevek evropskega ribištva k strategiji Evropa 2020
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Contributions of European fisheries to the Europe 2020 Strategy
Splošno je znano, da je evropsko ribištvo del ekonomskega in socialnega življenja obalnih skupnosti, če pa se ga ne pazljivo upravlja, lahko prispeva k slabšanju morskega okolja.
It is widely recognised that European fisheries are an integral part of the economic and social life of coastal communities, though these fisheries can also contribute to the degradation of the marine environment unless they are carefully managed.