natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V poglavju o izvrševanju v civilnih zadevah trgovinskega sporazuma proti ponarejanju (ACTA), prvi odstavek člena 2.X se glasi: Ta pooblastila omogočajo sodnim organom, da izdajo odredbo proti stranki ali tretji stranki, da preprečijo spornemu blagu vstop v trgovinske kanale.
In the Civil Enforcement section of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), paragraph 1 of Article 2.X: Injunctions allows judicial authorities to issue an order (injunction) against a party, or a third party, to ‘prevent infringing goods from entering into the channels of commerce’.
To pooblastilo za odredbo je precej drugačno od tistega v pravnem redu EU (člen 9 Direktive o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine (Direktiva 2004/48/ES)), kjer sodni organi izdajo odredbo, "namenjeno preprečitvi kakršne koli neposredne kršitve pravice intelektualne lastnine".
This injunction power is considerably different from that existing under the EU acquis (Article 9 of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (Directive 2004/48/EC)), which permits injunctions ‘to prevent any imminent infringement’.
Poleg tega morajo tretje stranke sodelovati pri kršitvi ("proti posrednikom, katerih storitve tretja stranka uporablja").
Furthermore, the third parties need to be involved in the infringement (‘against an intermediary whose services are being used’).
Besedilo iz ACTA v bistvu odpravlja prag za pooblastila za odredbo, ki obstaja v pravnem redu EU.
The ACTA text essentially eliminates the thresholds for injunction powers that exist under the EU acquis .
Glede na to, da je z določitvijo praga za izrekanje odredb pravni red EU vzpostavil občutljivo ravnotežje med izvrševanjem in varovanjem temeljnih pravic, kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo ohranjene te pravice iz sedanjega pravnega reda?
Given that, by laying down the thresholds for injunctions, the EU acquis has struck a delicate balance between enforcement and fundamental rights safeguards, how will the Commission ensure that these safeguards under the current EU acquis are maintained?
Kako bo Komisija ohranila prag, ki ga postavlja pravni red EU?
How will the Commission safeguard the thresholds currently provided for in the EU acquis ?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0542/2010
Question for Question Time H-0542/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Prenos presoje o gensko spremenjenih organizmih (GSO) na nacionalne vlade
(S&D) Subject: GMO decision-making shift to national governments
Države članice različno obravnavajo vprašanje gojenja gensko spremenjenih pridelkov.
The issue of the cultivation of GM crops is dealt with differently from Member State to Member State.
Kljub temu je Komisija predlagala, naj se presojanje o odobritvi GSO prenese na nacionalne vlade.
However, the Commission has come up with a proposal to devolve decision-making on the authorisation of GMOs to national governments.
Če bo lahko vsaka država presojala o odobritvi, bo to lahko pomenilo začetek ponovne nacionalizacije politike EU in bo lahko imelo resne posledice za enotni trg.
Allowing authorisation by each country could mark the beginning of a re-nationalisation of EU policy and might have serious implications for the single market.
Kakšno stališče ima belgijsko predsedstvo o tem vprašanju?
What is the position of the Belgian Presidency on this particular issue?
Je predsedstvo naklonjeno jasnim pravilom o soobstoju gensko spremenjenih in tradicionalnih pridelkov na ravni EU, kjer ima Komisija osrednjo vlogo, ali je naklonjeno presojanju na nacionalni ravni?
Is the Presidency in favour of clear rules on the co-existence of GM and non-GM crops at EU level, with the Commission playing a major role, or in favour of decision-making at national level?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0543/2010
Question for Question Time H-0543/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Jamstvo biološke varnosti v državah članicah
(S&D) Subject: Guarantee of biological security in the Member States
Komisija je v industrijske namene odobrila pridelavo gensko spremenjenega krompirja sorte Amflora v Evropski uniji.
The Commission has authorised the cultivation of ‘Amflora’ genetically modified potatoes in the European Union for industrial purposes.
Trenutno se ta sorta prideluje v Nemčiji, na Švedskem in na Češkem.
These are currently grown in Germany, Sweden and the Czech Republic.
Blizu polj krompirja Amflora na Švedskem so bile odkrite rastline sorte Amadea, ki jo je prepovedano pridelovati.
Potato plants of the ‘Amadea’ variety, which is not authorised for cultivation, have been discovered growing next to ‘Amflora’ potatoes in fields in Sweden.
To odkritje vzbuja nemir, saj očitno ni jamstva za biološko varnost v Uniji.
This discovery raises serious concerns about the obvious lack of guarantees regarding biological security in the European Union.
Kakšne ukrepe je sprejela Komisija, da bi raziskala zgoraj omenjeni primer, in kakšni so rezultati teh preiskav?
What measures has the Commission taken to investigate the above-mentioned case, and what was the outcome?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da se gensko spremenjene rastlinske vrste, ki niso odobrene v EU, ne bodo pojavile na trgu EU?
How does the Commission intend to guarantee that genetically modified plant varieties that are not authorised in the EU will not end up on the EU market?
Ali Komisija ne meni, da je treba okrepiti odgovornost držav članic, če se na njihovem ozemlju najde gensko spremenjene rastline, ki so prepovedane v EU?
Does the Commission not consider that Member States should be more accountable if genetically modified crops that are banned in the EU are found on their territory?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0544/2010
Question for Question Time H-0544/2010
(EFD) Zadeva: Večja zaščita delavcev in državljanov, izpostavljenim azbestu
(EFD) Subject: Improved protection for workers and members of the public exposed to asbestos
Kot je znano, je azbest zelo škodljiva in nevarna snov, ki povzroča dihalne bolezni in različne vrste raka, med drugim tudi mezoteliom, rak na pljučni mreni.
As is well-known, asbestos is an extremely harmful and hazardous substance which can provoke respiratory diseases and various types of cancer, including mesothelioma of the pleura.
V Italiji je vsako leto približno 3000 žrtev bolezni, ki so povezane z azbestom, ter 32 milijonov ton azbesta, ki čaka na odstranitev.
In Italy, there are some 32 million tonnes of asbestos cement on the market, while every year 3000 people fall victim to asbestos-related illnesses.
Na Nizozemskem vsako leto odkrijejo 1000 primerov bolezni, povezane z izpostavljenostjo azbestu, medtem ko se je število mrtvih v Franciji dvignilo na 3000 letno.
In the Netherlands 1000 exposure-related cases are diagnosed each year, while in France the annual number of victims stands at 3000.
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0545/2010
Question for Question Time H-0545/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam in zunanji dolg držav v razvoju
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Adaptation to climate change and external debt of developing countries
Konec leta 2009 je Evropski svet sklenil, da bodo Evropska unija in njene države članice za obdobje 2010–2012 vsako leto prispevale 2,4 milijarde EUR k financiranju „hitrega zagona“ za prilagajanje držav v razvoju podnebnim spremembam.
At the end of 2009 the European Council decided that the EU and its Member States would contribute financing on an annual basis to adaptation to climate change in developing countries, in the form of 'fast-start funding' of EUR 2.4 billion per annum, for the period 2010-2012.
Toliko tudi znaša manj kot odstotek vrednosti zunanjega dolga vseh afriških držav (po podatkih iz leta 2006).
It also represents less than 1% of the value of the external debt of all of the African countries (on 2006 figures).
Ali lahko Svet navede, koliko sredstev je bilo doslej namenjeno financiranju „hitrega zagona“ v državah v razvoju za obdobje 2010–2012?
Can the Council state what amounts have been channelled so far to developing countries as 'fast-start funding' for the period 2010-2012?
Koliko sredstev bo dodeljenih v naslednjih dveh letih?
What sums will be transferred over the next two years?
V kakšnih konkretnih oblikah?
What concrete forms will this funding take?
Ali je načrtovano povišanje teh sredstev?
Is the Council considering the possibility of increasing the funding?
Ali Svet ne meni, da zunanji dolg in njegovo odplačevanje močno ovira razvoj manj razvitih držav, ki so za odplačevanje dolga doslej namenile že velik del sredstev, in da bi ga bilo treba zato odpraviti?
Does the Council not believe that the external debt and debt servicing of the least developed countries represents an enormous constraint on their development, which has already obliged them to dedicate a large proportion of their resources to servicing a dent which should, surely, now be written off?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0546/2010
Question for Question Time H-0546/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Strukturni skladi in invalidnost
(S&D) Subject: Structural Funds and disability
Iz številnih poročil o uporabi strukturnih skladov je razvidno, da razdeljevanje sredstev kljub temu, da jih prejmejo tisti, ki jih najbolj potrebujejo, ne poteka na način, ki bi bil zanje najugodnejši ali bi jim resnično izboljšal kakovost življenja.
Many reports on the use of the Structural Funds show that, even if resources reach those who need them most, this is not done in the manner that would be most beneficial for them or in such a way as to bring about a genuine improvement in the quality of their lives.
Kako namerava Komisija preprečiti, da bi se sredstva iz strukturnih skladov uporabljala za financiranje namestitve invalidov v zavode?
How does the Commission plan to prevent the Structural Funds being used to finance the institutionalisation of people with disabilities?
Kako namerava spodbujati uporabo teh sredstev za financiranje drugih možnosti na ravni lokalne skupnosti, ki bi nadomestile institucionalno varstvo in omogočile socialno vključenost invalidov?
How does it plan to encourage their use to finance community-based alternatives to institutional care and promote the social inclusion of people with disabilities?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0547/2010
Question for Question Time H-0547/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Pomoč pri vzpostavljanju "inteligentnega" omrežja
(S&D) Subject: Support for the establishment of 'smart grids'
V zadnjih letih so države članice letno namenile milijarde evrov za ukrepe za spodbujanje uporabe obnovljivih virov energije.
In recent years, Member States have granted billions of euro each year for the use of renewable energy sources.
Nato so bile nekatere tako ustvarjene proizvodne zmogljivosti ukinjene, ker električna omrežja niso bila sposobna prenašati električne energije, proizvedene na tak način.
Subsequently, some of the production capacity thus created was shut down due to the inability of the power grids to take over the electricity produced.
Evropska unija in njene države članice morajo vlagati v posodobitev električne infrastrukture, da bi lahko ta sprejela proizvedeno energijo in tako povečala dobičkonosnost naložb v infrastrukturo za proizvodnjo obnovljive energije.
The EU and the Member States should invest in the modernisation of electricity infrastructure so that it is able to deal with the energy produced and thus make investments in renewable energy infrastructure more profitable.
V svojem delovnem programu za leto 2011 se je Komisija zavezala, da bo po presoji vpliva predložila zakonodajne pobude o ukrepih za pomoč pri vzpostavitvi t.i. „inteligentnih“ omrežij.
In its work programme for 2011 the Commission pledged to submit, after conducting an impact study, a legislative initiative concerning support measures for the implementation of so-called smart grids.
Ali lahko Komisija navede glavne ukrepe, ki jih namerava vključiti v to pobudo?
Can the Commission say what the key measures in this initiative will be?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0548/2010
Question for Question Time H-0548/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Neodgovorjeno vprašanje E-7329/2010 o primeru WikiLeaks
(ALDE) Subject: Unanswered Written Question E-7329/2010 concerning WikiLeaks
V skladu z nujnim postopkom sem 13. avgusta Komisiji in Svetu poslal pisno vprašanje z naslovom „Primer WikiLeaks – preglednost, svoboda tiska in dostop do informacij v EU“ .
On 13 August I sent a written question to the Commission and the Council with the subject line 'WikiLeaks case, transparency, press freedom and access to information in the EU' through the urgent procedure.
Status pisnega vprašanja za Komisijo je bil kasneje spremenjen v navadno pisno vprašanje.
The status of the written question for the Commission was subsequently changed to that of a regular written question.
Zakaj Komisija ni odgovorila na moje vprašanje v določenem roku?
Why has the Commission failed to answer my written question within the deadline?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0549/2010
Question for Question Time H-0549/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Trgovinski odnosi med EU in Južno Afriko
(PPE) Subject: EU - South Africa trade relations
Kakšni so obeti za sklenitev sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu med EU in Južno Afriko?
What are the prospects of South Africa concluding an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with the EU?
Ali je bil na srečanju na vrhu EU–Južna Afrika 28. septembra 2010 dosežen kakšen napredek v zvezi s tem?
Has the EU-South Africa summit, held on 28 September 2010, provided any breakthroughs in this regard?
Katere so najbolj akutne ovire in sporne točke v tem procesu?
What are the most acute obstacles and contentious issues in this process?
Kakšne so možnosti za sklenitev takšnega sporazuma pred koncem tega leta?
What is the chance that such an agreement could be concluded before the end of this year?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0550/2010
Question for Question Time H-0550/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Črpanje strukturnih in kohezijskih skladov
(PPE) Subject: Absorption of Structural and Cohesion Funds
Približuje se vmesni pregled finančne perspektive za obdobje 2007–2013, zato je zdaj pravi čas za oceno dosedanje uporabe strukturnih in kohezijskih skladov v različnih državah članicah.
As the EU approaches the midterm review of the 2007-2013 financial perspective, it is timely to assess the absorption record of the Structural and Cohesion Funds in different Member States.
Katere države so na čelu v smislu črpanja iz skladov?
Which countries are the leaders in terms of absorbing the funds?
Kakšne so možnosti, da nekatere države članice ne bi bile zmožne v celoti izkoristiti sredstev, ki so jim namenjene v sedanji finančni perspektivi?
What is the risk that some Member States might not be able to fully use the funds earmarked for them in the current financial perspective?
Kako bi lahko povečali zmogljivost črpanja teh sredstev v različnih državah članicah?
What can be done to improve the absorption capacity in different Member States?
Kako se je doslej v tem pogledu odrezala Litva?
What is the record of Lithuania in this regard thus far?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0551/2010
Question for Question Time H-0551/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Akt za mala podjetja
(ALDE) Subject: The Small Business Act
Pregled Akta za mala podjetja je prednostna naloga belgijskega predsedovanja EU.
The review of the Small Business Act is a priority of the Belgian Presidency of the EU.
Ali lahko Svet navede, katere ukrepe je sprejel za pregled te pobude, da bi izboljšali konkurenčnost MSP v EU?
Can the Council outline what actions it has undertaken to review this initiative so as to improve the competitiveness of SMEs in the EU?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0552/2010
Question for Question Time H-0552/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Skupna konsolidirana osnova za davek od dobička pravnih oseb (CCCTB)
(ALDE) Subject: Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)
Ali lahko Komisija poda izjavo, ki potrjuje, da predlagana pobuda o CCCTB ne bo vplivala na zmožnost držav članic, da določijo svojo lastno davčno stopnjo za pravne osebe?
Can the Commission make a statement confirming that the proposed CCCTB initiative will not impact upon the ability of Member States to set their individual corporation tax rate?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0553/2010
Question for Question Time H-0553/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Vrh EU-ZDA 20. novembra 2010
(ALDE) Subject: EU-US Summit - 20 November 2010
Ali lahko Svet zagotovi pregled ključnih političnih dogovorov, sklenjenih na nedavnem vrhu EU–ZDA 20. novembra 2010?
Can the Council provide an overview of the key political agreements reached at the recent EU-US Summit on 20 November 2010?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0554/2010
Question for Question Time H-0554/2010
(ALDE) Zadeva: Program Erasmus Mundus
(ALDE) Subject: The Erasmus Mundus programme
Ali lahko Komisija navede, katere strategije izvaja, da bi povečala raven udeležbe v programu Erasmus Mundus v EU?
Can the Commission outline what strategies it is pursuing to increase levels of participation in the Erasmus Mundus programme in the EU?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0555/2010
Question for Question Time H-0555/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Protikomunistična kampanja v Gruziji
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Anti-communist campaign in Georgia
Gruzijski parlament je pred kratkim sprejel tako imenovano listino za svobodo, v kateri so določbe o čistki v javni upravi, kjer je nekdanjim visokim predstavnikom komunistične partije, komsomola in sovjetskih oblasti po novem prepovedano delati, predvideva pa tudi prepoved sovjetskih in nacističnih simbolov.
The Georgian Parliament recently adopted the ‘Freedom Charter’, which includes measures to purge public administration, for which no former officers of the Communist Party, the Komsomol and the Soviet authorities will in future be permitted to work, and plans to ban Soviet and Nazi symbols.
Zakon je del protikomunistične kampanje, v kateri ima EU eno od osrednjih vlog, z njo pa se kršijo temeljne demokratične pravice, saj v nasprotju z zgodovinskimi dejstvi izenačuje fašizem in komunizem ter spreminja svetovno zgodovino in zgodovino Gruzije.
This law forms part of an anti-communist campaign in which the EU is playing a key role, in violation of fundamental democratic rights, attempting – with no regard to history – to assimilate Fascism to Communism and distorting global history and the history of Georgia itself.
Ali Svet obsoja ta protikomunistični zakon, ki je v nasprotju s pravicami, povezanimi s svobodo misli in izražanja ter političnega delovanja komunističnih in delavskih strank?
Does the Council condemn this anti-communist law, which flies in the face of the right to freedom of thought and speech and the freedom of political activity for the Communist and Workers’ Parties?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0556/2010
Question for Question Time H-0556/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: 4.500 delavcev v nevzdržnem položaju
(GUE/NGL) Subject: 4 500 workers held to ransom
Skoraj 4.500 delavcev, ki so zaposleni v okviru programa "Pomoč na domu", ki nudi storitve nege več kot 100.000 starejšim osebam, je v nevzdržnem položaju.
Some 4 500 workers employed by the ‘Help at Home’ programme, who provide care for over 100 000 elderly people, are being held to ransom.
Temu programu, ki so ga vzpostavile občine in ki se financira iz sredstev Skupnosti in nacionalnih virov, naj bi ob koncu leta 2010 ukinili financiranje.
This local authority-run programme is financed by Community funding and Community resources, and funding is to be cancelled at the end of 2010.
Politika Evropske unije in zaporedne grške vlade – PASOK in Nova demokracija – ponovno uporablja sredstva Skupnosti – ki so dejansko denar delavcev držav članic Evropske unije – za razdrobitev nudenja storitev na področju zdravstva in socialne varnosti, da bi se tako te storitve spremenile v blago, namesto za zadovoljitev potreb prebivalstva in za oblikovanje trajnih in stalnih delovnih mest s pravicami.
Once again, the policy of the European Union and successive Greek governments – formed both by PASOK and the ND – is not to use Community funds – i.e. money from workers in the EU Member States – to meet the needs of the people and create stable and permanent jobs with rights, but to pave the way for breaking up the unity of healthcare and social security service provision in order to turn these services into goods.
Kakšno je stališče Komisije glede pravic delavcev, zaposlenih v okviru omenjenega programa, in delavcev na splošno do trajnega in stalnega delovnega mesta s pravicami in glede pravice prebivalstva do kakovostnih zdravstvenih storitev in storitev socialne varnosti, ki so zgolj javne in brezplačne in v celoti odvisne od ministrstva za zdravje ter financirane iz nacionalnega proračuna?
What is the Commission’s position with respect to the right of those working under the aforementioned programme, and of workers in general, to a stable and permanent job with rights, and as regards people's entitlement to exclusively public and free high-quality healthcare and social security service provision which is fully incorporated within the Ministry of Health and financed by the national budget?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0557/2010
Question for Question Time H-0557/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Nedopustna aretacija člana čilske komunistične partije na podlagi neutemeljenih obtožb
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Inadmissible arrest of a member of the Chilean Communist Party on trumped up charges
Čilske oblasti so aretirale in preventivno priprle člana čilske komunistične partije Manuela Olateja Céspedesa, ki ga nameravajo izročiti reakcionarni kolumbijski vladi, ker naj bi bil povezan z revolucionarnimi oboroženimi silami Kolumbije (FARC), kar je za demokratične pravice in svoboščine zelo nevaren precedens.
The arrest and ‘preventive detention’ by the Chilean authorities of Manuel Olate Cespedes, member of the Chilean Communist Party, who is to be handed over to the reactionary Colombian Government on charges of association with the FARC, sets a particularly dangerous precedent regarding democratic rights and freedoms.
Obtožnica proti temu čilskemu komunističnemu borcu, ki je tudi član bolivarskega kontinentalnega gibanja in organizacij, ki podpirajo kolumbijsko ljudstvo, sloni na neutemeljenih in očitno ponarejenih dokazih – o verodostojnosti katerih je izrazil dvom tudi Interpol –, ki izvirajo iz računalnika člana uporniške skupine FARC Raoula Reyesa, umorjenega leta 2008 med nezakonito operacijo pod vodstvom kolumbijske vojske na ekvadorskem ozemlju.
The charges against Manuel Olate Cespedes, who is also a member of the Bolivarian Continental Movement and a number of organisations for solidarity with the people of Columbia, are based on manifestly falsified evidence – which has also failed to convince Interpol – taken from a computer belonging to Raoul Reyes, a leading FARC member killed in Ecuador in 2008 in the course of an illegal operation conducted by the Colombian army.
Ali Svet obsoja lov na čarovnice, ki ga po vsej Latinski Ameriki uprizarjajo razne reakcionarne vlade in tajne službe proti ljudskemu gibanju in komunistom, pri čemer uporabljajo ponarejene in neutemeljene dokaze, ki naj bi izhajali iz računalnika Raoula Reyesa?
Does the Council condemn the ‘witch hunt’ being conducted against movements and Communist members throughout Latin America by various reactionary governments and secret services using falsified and fabricated evidence allegedly taken from a computer belonging to Raoul Reyes?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0558/2010
Question for Question Time H-0558/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Nevzdržen položaj pogodbenih delavcev na deponiji odpadkov v Solunu
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Contract workers at the Thessaloniki landfill site being held to ransom
Zavrnitev pritožbe na sodišču, ki jo je vložilo 160 pogodbenih delavcev, zaposlenih pri Zvezi lokalnih skupnosti v grškem Solunu, je še en primer resne kršitve pravice do varne in stalne zaposlitve.
A court ruling rejecting an appeal by 160 local authority contract workers in Thessaloniki is yet another serious blow to the right to stable and permanent employment.