natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0066/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0066/06
Zadeva: Smernice o napotitvi delavcev na delo, ki jih je predstavil komisar Spidla
Subject: Guidelines on the posting of workers presented by Commissioner Spidla
Komisija je na zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta 4. aprila 2006 predstavila nov osnutek direktive o storitvah, ki v bistvenih točkah upošteva predloge sprememb Parlamenta.
At the European Parliament's sitting of 4 April 2006, the Commission presented the new draft services directive, the essential points of which take into account Parliament's amendments.
Bistvena razlika med prvotno in novo različico direktive je ta, da so odstranjene ključne določbe o liberalizaciji trga storitev, vključno z načelom države izvora.
The new version of the directive differs essentially from the original version in that key provisions on the liberalisation of the services market have been removed, including the country of origin principle.
Novi predlog občutno ne razširja pomanjkljivih določb o prostem pretoku storitev, ki trenutno veljajo v skladu s pogodbami.
It does not significantly extend the flawed provisions on the free movement of services currently in force under the Treaties.
Predsednik Komisije, ki je v zadnjih mesecih zagovarjal bledo različico osnutka direktive o storitvah, je obljubil, da bodo črtane določbe nadomeščene z drugimi rešitvami.
Defending the watered-down version of the draft services directive in recent months, the Commission President has pledged that the deleted provisions would be replaced by other solutions.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega:
In the light of the above:
Ali neobvezujoče smernice o napotitvi delavcev na delo, ki so bile objavljene hkrati z novim osnutkom direktive o storitvah in ki jih je predstavil komisar Spidla, predstavljajo "druge rešitve", o katerih je govoril predsednik Komisije?
Do the non-binding guidelines on the posting of workers, which were announced at the same time at the new draft services directive and presented by Commissioner Spidla, constitute the 'other solutions' referred to by the Commission President?
Ali Komisija meni, da so zgoraj omenjene smernice učinkovito sredstvo za zagotavljanje liberalizacije skupnega notranjega trga storitev?
Is it the Commission's view that the abovementioned guidelines are an effective means of guaranteeing liberalisation of the internal common market in services?
Ali lahko predlogi, ki jih vsebujejo smernice, kot sta izmenjava izkušenj med podjetji glede napotitve delavcev na delo ali pošiljanje vprašalnikov nacionalnim organom, da ocenijo svoje ovire pri napotitvi delavcev na delo, učinkovito preprečijo omejevanje svobode opravljanja storitev, ki je bilo uvedeno v nekaterih državah članicah?
Does it consider that proposals contained in the guidelines, such as sharing of experience by firms with regard to the posting of workers or sending a questionnaire to the national authorities for them to evaluate their own barriers to the posting of workers, can effectively counter the restrictions on the freedom to provide services introduced by some Member States?
Ali bo Komisija pripravila druge rešitve, ki bodo učinkovito prispevale k liberalizaciji trga storitev, ali se bo zadovoljila z nepravimi ukrepi, kot so izdajanje smernic, ki imajo le "dekorativno vrednost", ali opredelitev svobode opravljanja storitev v osnutku direktive, ki je v pogodbah Skupnosti že dolgo prisotna?
Will the Commission put forward other solutions designed to effectively further the liberalisation of the services market or will it content itself with bogus measures such as the issuing of guidelines which are no more than window-dressing, or the drawing up of a draft directive on the freedom to provide services, something which has long been enshrined in the Community Treaties?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0067/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0067/06
Zadeva: Varstvo okolja: preprečevanje kriminala, kazniva dejanja in kazenske sankcije
Subject: Environmental protection: combating crime, criminal offences and penalties
Komisija je 13. marca 2001 predložila osnutek direktive o varstvu okolja: preprečevanju kriminala, kaznivih dejanjih in kazenskih sankcijah.
On 13 March 2001, the Commission put forward a draft directive on ‘Environmental protection: combating crime, criminal offences and penalties’.
Istega dne je Evropski parlament v zakonodajni resoluciji o osnutku okvirnega sklepa Sveta o kazenskopravnem varovanju okolja prosil Svet, naj tega okvirnega sklepa ne sprejme, dokler ne bo sprejeta direktiva, ki jo je predlagala Komisija.
On the same day, in its legislative resolution on the draft Council framework decision on the protection of the environment through criminal law, the European Parliament asked the Council to refrain from adopting this framework decision prior to the adoption of the directive proposed by the Commission.
Toda Svet ni sprejel političnega sporazuma o tem predlogu direktive, temveč je namesto tega v okviru tretjega stebra sprejel okvirni sklep o isti temi (Okvirni sklep Sveta 2003/80/PNZ z dne 27. januarja 2003 o kazenskopravnem varovanju okolja, UL L 29, 5.2.2003, str.
The Council, however, never adopted a political agreement on this proposal for a directive, and preferred, instead, to adopt the third pillar framework decision on the same subject (Council Framework Decision 2003/80/JHA of 27 January 2003 on the protection of the environment through criminal law, OJ L 29, 5.2.2003, p.
Ta okvirni sklep sta Komisija in Parlament izpodbijala pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti, in to ga je 13. septembra 2005 razveljavilo.
This was then challenged by the Commission and Parliament in the European Court of Justice and, on 13 September 2005, the Court annulled the Framework Decision.
Kaj namerava Svet storiti v odgovor na sklep Sodišča?
What does the Council plan to do after the Court of Justice Decision?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0068/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0068/06
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti v odgovor na sklep Sodišča?
What does the Commission plan to do after the Court of Justice Decision?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0069/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0069/06
Zadeva: Razvoj združitev in prevzemov (M&A) na evropskih borzah
Subject: Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) developments around Europe's stock exchanges
Kako Komisija ocenjuje konsolidacijo in možnosti razvoja združitev in prevzemov na največjih evropskih borzah, zlasti ko so pri tem udeležene ne samo evropske, ampak tudi ameriške borze?
How does the Commission assess the consolidation and possible merger and acquisition developments around major European stock exchanges, particularly where not only European but also USA based stock exchanges are involved?
Ali molk Komisije pomeni, da Komisija obravnava stopnjevanje dejavnosti združitev in prevzemov le kot vprašanje delničarjev zadevnih družb, ki imajo so lastnice platform za trgovanje?
Does the silence from the Commission indicate that you consider this heightened M&A activity to be purely an issue for the shareholders of the respective companies that own these trading platforms?
Ali bi bilo primerno, da se jasno opredelijo evropski javni interes in temeljni pogoji za dobro delovanje storitev trgovanja in storitev po trgovanju (ob upoštevanju, med drugim, morebitnega vpliva čezatlantskega združevanja na evropsko pravo družb in upravljanje družb)?
Or would it be appropriate to formulate clearly the European public interest in and essential conditions for well- functioning trading and post-trading services (taking inter alia into consideration the possible impact of a cross-Atlantic merger on European company law and corporate governance)?
Kako bi lahko konsolidacija in možne (zlasti čezmejne in čezatlantske) kombinacije vplivale na učinkovitost trgovanja, razporeditev naložb v evropskem gospodarstvu ter na stroške in koristi evropskih izdajateljev, investitorjev, udeležencev na trgu in delničarjev?
What could the impact of consolidation and of possible (particularly cross border and cross-Atlantic) combinations be for the efficiency of trading, for the allocation of investments into the European economy and for the costs and benefits of European issuers, investors, market participants and shareholders?
Kakšen bi bil vpliv na regulatorni in nadzorni režim, zlasti če so vključeni partnerji iz ZDA?
What would the impact be on regulatory and supervisory regimes particularly if US partners are involved?
Katere ukrepe sprejema Komisija pri spremljanju tega vpliva?
What action is the Commission taking in monitoring this impact?
Kako Komisija razume pogoje, ki jih bodo regulatorni organi ZDA določili za čezmejne združitve, in kakšen bo vpliv teh pogojev na evropske družbe, zlasti v zvezi z upravljanjem družb, nadzornim režimom in pristojnostjo na sodiščih ZDA?
How does the Commission perceive the conditions that US regulators will set on cross-Atlantic mergers, and what will be their impact for European companies notably as regards corporate governance issues, supervisory regimes and jurisdiction in US courts?
Ali bi se na primer uporabljala pravila Sarbanes-Oxley o upravljanju družb?
Would, for example, the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate governance rules apply?
Kaj to pomeni za razvoj evropskega trga finančnih storitev?
What does it mean for the development of a European financial services market?
Ali Komisija namerava preučiti učinek možnosti vseevropskega trgovanja in konsolidacije izračuna, izravnave in izpolnjevanja obveznosti na infrastrukturo Centralne in Vzhodne Evrope za storitve po trgovanju?
Has the Commission planned to study the effects of possible EU-wide trading and C & S consolidation on the Central and Eastern European post-trading infrastructures?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0070/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0070/06
Zadeva: Priseljevalna politika Evropske unije
Subject: European Union immigration policy
Priseljevanje v Evropo je kompleksen in večrazsežnosten pojav, ki ga morajo evropske institucije obravnavati s strateškega vidika, ki obsega tako razvojno sodelovanje z državami izvora in trgovinsko politiko, vključno z nadzorom nad orožjem, kot tudi mejni nadzor preko politike integracije, vključno s sprejemnimi ukrepi, ob hkratnem zagotavljanju najstrožjega spoštovanja človekovih pravic.
Immigration to Europe is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon that needs to be addressed by the European institutions from a strategic point of view ranging from development cooperation with countries of origin and trade policy including arm control to border control via integration policy including reception measures, whilst ensuring the strictest respect for human rights.
Ali lahko Komisija poroča o doseženem napredku pri doseganju ciljev iz strategije za Afriko, posebej glede krepitve povezav med selitvami in razvojem in glede spodbujanja sorazvoja, prostovoljne vrnitve in ponovne integracije v državah izvora?
Can the Commission report on the progress made towards achieving the objectives set in the Strategy for Africa, specifically with regard to strengthening the links between migration and development and promoting codevelopment, voluntary return, reintegration in the countries of origin?
Kako Komisija spodbuja oblikovanje integriranih regionalnih trgov v različnih podsaharskih regijah?
What incentives is the Commission using to foster the creation of integrated regional markets in the various sub-Saharan regions?
Kako namerava uveljaviti načrt za zakonito priseljevanje, predviden v Haaškem programu, ki ga je predložila decembra 2005?
How does it intend to implement the legal immigration plan envisaged in the Hague Programme, which it submitted in December 2005?
Kako namerava Komisija obravnavati ta integrirani pristop in zagotoviti jasno komunikacijo in sprejemanje odločitev, da bodo njene politike in akcije težile k komplementarnosti?
How does the Commission intend to organise itself to deal with this integrated approach and ensure clear lines of communication and decision-making so that its policies and actions move in a complementary direction?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0071/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0071/06
Zadeva: Ekonomske in socialne posledice prestrukturiranja podjetij v Evropi
Subject: Economic and social consequences of companies restructuring in Europe
General Motors Europe (GME) se je iz ekonomskih razlogov junija 2006 odločil zapreti svoj obrat v Azambuji (Portugalska).
General Motors Europe (GME) decided in June 2006 to close its plant in Azambuja (Portugal) for economic reasons.
V obratu je zaposlenih 1150 ljudi, v vsej Evropi pa General Motors zaposluje okrog 64.000 delavcev.
The plant employs 1150 people while General Motors employs around 64 000 workers in Europe.
Zaprtje ne bo prizadelo le neke regije na Portugalskem, ampak naraščajo bojazni, da GME uporablja strategijo preseljevanja proizvodnje v države izven EU, ne da bi pri tem upošteval svojo socialno in finančno odgovornost.
Not only does this affect a region in Portugal, but there are mounting fears concerning a GME strategy to shift production towards countries outside the EU without any consideration for its social and financial responsibility.
Zaenkrat GME predstavnikom delavcev še ni sporočil nobenih podatkov glede donosnosti te portugalske tovarne.
So far, GME has not communicated to worker's representatives the figures concerning the profitability of the Portuguese plant.
Po drugi strani pa je od portugalske vlade za podporo svojih dejavnosti v regiji Azambuja prejel več kot 40 milijonov evrov.
On the other hand, GME has received over EUR 40 million from the Portuguese Government in support of its activities in the region of Azambuja.
Kako trajnosten je po mnenju Komisije razvoj avtomobilske industrije v EU, ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega?
In the light of the above, how sustainable is the development of the automobile industry in the EU in the Commission's view?
Katera evropska sredstva so bila dodeljena podjetju GME za njegove dejavnosti na Portugalskem in v drugih državah članicah?
What European funds has GME been allocated for its activities in Portugal and in the other EU Member States?
Ali podjetje General Motors Europe trenutno prosi EU za ekonomsko podporo svojih dejavnosti in če jo, na katerih lokacijah?
Does the EU currently have any requests from General Motors Europe for economic support for their activities, and if so in which locations?
Kaj namerava storiti Komisija za to, da se zagotovi, da bodo podjetja v EU spoštovala svojo socialno in finančno odgovornost, delovala na korporacijsko odgovoren način in bodo poštena do vseh vpletenih strani (delavcev, lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti itd.) in skupnosti v krajih, kjer imajo svoje obrate, in ne bodo gledala zgolj na povečevanje svojih dobičkov?
What does the Commission plan to do to ensure that companies in the EU respect their social and financial responsibilities, act in a corporately responsible way and are fair to all stakeholders (workers, local, regional authorities, etc.) and communities where they are based, and are not only looking at maximising profits?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0072/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0072/06
Zadeva: Obrat Eaton v Rivarolu Canavese, Turin
Subject: Eaton production plant in Rivarolo Cavanese, Turin
13. aprila je družba Eaton srl iz kraja Rivarolo Canavese (Turin) uvedla postopek uvrstitve na seznam mobilnosti za vse delavce (približno 200) proizvodnega obrata v Rivarolu Canaveseju.
On 13 April 2006, the company Eaton srl of Rivarolo Cavanese (Turin) launched the ‘mobility procedure’ for the entire staff (approximately 200 employees) of the Rivarolo Cavanese production plant.
Kljub začetku pogovorov s sindikalnimi organizacijami in lokalnimi institucijami za razrešitev težav obstaja nevarnost, da bo postopek zaključen 12. julija brez konkretnih rezultatov.
This procedure, despite the opening of crisis talks with trade unions and local institutions, runs the risk of closing on 12 July 2006 without any significant outcome.
Ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
Given that:
postopek uvrstitve na seznam mobilnosti zbuja resno skrb za prihodnost proizvodne dejavnosti obrata in za več kot 2000 zaposlenih v drugih proizvodnih enotah te družbe, ki so razmeščeni po drugih državah Evropske unije;
the mobility procedure raises considerable concerns for the future of the plant’s production activities and for the 2 000 people employed in the company’s other production sites in a number of other EU Member States,
ukrep mobilnosti je v nasprotju z obvezami, ki so bile sprejete s sporazumom februarja 2005;
application of mobility breaches the commitment made in the February 2005 agreement;
ukrep skoraj gotovo temelji na zahtevah po delokalizaciji, ki bi zagotovila večje marže, in se ne ozira na potrebe tega območja in pravice do dela 200 delavcev ter na prihodnost 200 družin.
this application of mobility is almost certainly motivated by the requirements of delocalisation aimed at guaranteeing more significant operating margins regardless of geographical requirements and of the right to work of 200 employees and of the prospects of 200 families;
Kako namerava Komisija ukrepati v tem težkem primeru prestrukturiranja, ki se ne tiče le Italije, ampak številnih držav Unije?
How does the Commission intend to respond to this serious case of restructuring, which affects not only Italy but also a number of other EU Member States?
Ali ni Komisija mnenja, da se z nespoštovanjem sporazumov med podjetji in sindikati kršijo pravila Skupnosti, ki so jih druge države članice že sprejele?
Does not the Commission consider that the failure to respect agreements between businesses and trade unions breaches Community rules already adopted by the other Member States?
Ali namerava Komisija pozvati države članice, naj si prizadevajo zagotoviti spoštovanje sporazumov med sindikati in podjetji?
Does the Commission intend to call on the Member States to strive to ensure that agreements between unions and businesses are respected?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0073/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0073/06
Zadeva: Politika priseljevanja Evropske unije
Subject: European Union immigration policy
Kljub visoko zastavljenim ciljem glede azila in priseljevanja je bilo doslej doseženega malo napredka.
While recognising that the goals which have been set in the field of asylum and immigration are very ambitious, little progress has been achieved yet.
Treba je tudi omeniti, da je bila doslej zakonodaja večinoma namenjena preprečevanju nezakonitega priseljevanja in je niso spremljala zadostna prizadevanja za spodbujanje integracije zakonitih priseljencev, ki so državljani tretjih držav, ali za vzpostavitev pravnega okvira za priseljevanje.
Furthermore it should be noted that legislation has mainly been devoted thus far to action to counter illegal immigration and has not been accompanied by sufficient efforts to promote the integration of legally resident third country nationals or to establish a legal migration framework.
Treba je priznati, da bi s politiko priseljevanja Evropske unije morali:
It should be recognised that a European Union immigration policy should
vzpostaviti skladno politiko priseljevanja, da bi razvili pravne poti za priseljevanje, s čimer bi zmanjšali zlasti spodbude za nezakonito priseljevanje,
establish a coherent immigration policy in order to develop legal routes to migration, which might in particular reduce the incentives for illegal immigration,
odzvati se na nove demografske in ekonomske izzive, s katerimi se trenutno sooča Unija, ob polnem upoštevanju sprejemne zmogljivosti držav članic,
meet the new demographic and economic challenges currently faced by the Union, taking full account of the Member States' reception capacities,
vzpostaviti skladen okvir za mednarodno sodelovanje z državami izvora;
establish a coherent framework of international cooperation with the countries of origin,
zavarovati zunanje meje in okrepiti boj proti trgovini z ljudmi,
secure the external borders and the fight against human trafficking,
oblikovati evropsko politiko vračanja,
establish a European return policy,
priznati jasno povezavo med razvojem (države izvora) in priseljevanjem.
recognise a clear link between development (countries of origin) and migration.
Četudi je Svet tisti, ki soglasno odloča o uporabi "premostitvene" klavzule ("passerelle") iz druge alinee člena 67(2) Pogodbe, da se Parlamentu dodeli pravica do soodločanja glede integracije in zakonitega priseljevanja ter se omogoči glasovanje s kvalificirano večino v Svetu, se Komisijo spodbuja, naj si dejavno prizadeva za pozitivno odločitev v zvezi s tem.
Although it is for the Council to unanimously decide to activate the 'passerelle' clause of Article 67(2), second indent of the Treaty to give Parliament co-decision powers on integration and legal migration, and qualified majority voting in the Council, the Commission is encouraged to actively pursue a positive decision to that effect.
Vprašanja za Komisijo so torej naslednja:
The questions to the Commission are therefore:
Si bo Komisija dejavno prizadevala, da bi pozitivno vplivala na odločitev o "premostitveni" klavzuli?
Will the Commission actively seek to positively influence a decision on the ‘passerelle’ clause?
Ali bo Komisija, ne glede na pozitivno odločitev o "premostitveni" klavzuli, prednostno obravnavala pripravo skladnega pravnega okvira za priseljevanje?
Will the Commission, notwithstanding a positive decision on the ‘passerelle’ clause, consider as a matter of priority drawing up a coherent legal migration framework?
Ali bo Komisija vzpostavila mehanizem spremljanja za ocenjevanje programov vključevanja v državah članicah, da bi zagotovila izmenjavo najboljših praks?
Will the Commission establish a monitoring mechanism for the evaluation of integration programmes in the Member States, with a view to ensuring an exchange of best practice?
Ali bo Komisija preučila pravice državljanov tretjih držav, ki so rezidenti za daljši čas, v zvezi z njihovo pravico glasovanja na lokalnih in občinskih volitvah?
Will the Commission undertake an evaluation of the rights of long-term resident third country nationals as regards their right to vote in local and municipal elections?
Ali je Komisija razmislila o programu za države izvora in države tranzita, ki bi bil namenjen razširjanju informacij o politiki priseljevanja EU in njenih praktičnih posledicah?
Has the Commission considered a programme for the countries of origin and transit, disseminating information on the EU immigration policy and its practical implications?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0074/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0074/06
Zadeva: Evropsko pogodbeno pravo
Subject: European contract law
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. marca 2006 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu in spremembi pravnega reda Skupnosti: pot naprej (P6_TA PROV(2006)0109),
Having regard to its resolution of 23 March 2006 on European contract law and the revision of the acquis: the way forward ( P6_TA-PROV(2006)0109 ),
ob upoštevanju prvega letnega poročila Komisije o napredku z dne 23. septembra 2005 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu in spremembi pravnega reda Skupnosti (KOM(2005)0456 končno), v katerem Komisija ugotavlja, da bo pregled pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov "prispeval k razvoju širšega skupnega referenčnega okvira";
having regard to the First annual Progress Report from the Commission of 23 September 2005 on European contract law and the acquis review (COM(2005)0456 final), in which the Commission states that the review of the consumer acquis 'will in turn feed into the development of the broader CFR',