natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi glavne strateške cilje Evropske unije za prihodnjo konferenco pogodbenic konvencije o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi prostoživečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami (CITES), ki bo v Dohi (Katar) med 13. in 25. marcem 2010?
Can the Commission present the key strategic objectives for the European Union at the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) that will be held in Doha (Qatar) from 13 to 25 March 2010?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0147/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0147/09
Zadeva: Revizija direktive o paketnih potovanjih
Subject: Revision of the Package Travel Directive
Direktiva o paketnih potovanjih št. 90/314/EGS določa osnovno varstvo potrošnikov, ki velja za paketna potovanja, vključno z razumljivimi informacijami o ponudbi, pravicami ob odpovedi potovanja in nadomestili zaradi podstandardnih storitev ali insolventnosti organizatorjev paketnih potovanj.
The Package Travel Directive 90/314/EEC lays down basic consumer protection for package travel holidays, including clear information on offers, holiday cancellation entitlements and redress for substandard services and the insolvency of package holiday operators.
To pomembno zakonodajno besedilo je bilo zasnovano pred skoraj dvajsetimi leti, ko so se potrošniki praviloma odločali za dvotedenske pakete iz brošur in jih rezervirali pri turistični agenciji.
This important piece of legislation was drafted nearly twenty years ago, when two-week package holidays from a brochure, booked via a travel agency, were the norm.
Vendar pa je današnji trg potovanj drugačen predvsem zaradi zanimanja za nizkocenovne lete.
However, today’s travel market has changed, owing to the interest of low-cost air travel.
Tehnološki napredek je prinesel nove poslovne modele in spremenil vedenje potrošnikov.
Technological developments have led to new business models and altered consumer behaviour.
Ti si danes vedno pogosteje organizirajo počitnice sami, tako da si prek spleta kupujejo letalske vozovnice, rezervirajo hotele in najemajo avtomobile.
Nowadays, consumers are increasingly putting together their own holidays – buying their own airline tickets, booking their own hotels and renting their cars separately online.
Evropski državljani ne morejo razumeti, zakaj dve osebi, ki sedita skupaj na istem letalu in sta celo nameščeni v istem hotelu, v primeru težav uživata popolnoma različni ravni varstva potrošnikov, zgolj zato, ker sta imeli različne rezervacije.
European citizens fail to understand why two people sitting next to each other on the same plane, and even staying at the same hotel, find they have totally different levels of consumer protection when something goes wrong – simply because their bookings were made in different ways.
Mnogi izmed teh dinamičnih paketov ne spadajo na področje uporabe Direktive št. 90/314/EGS o paketnih potovanjih.
Many of these dynamic packages do not fall within the scope of Package Travel Directive 90/314/EEC.
Zaradi tega je število potrošnikov, ki jih ta direktiva ščiti, vse manjše, čeprav hodi na počitnice vedno več državljanov.
Consequently, while more and more citizens are going on holiday, the ratio of consumers protected by that directive is actually decreasing.
Zato mora Evropa z ukrepi zagotoviti, da bodo potrošniki uživali vse prednosti notranjega trga, ki bo dejansko deloval v njihovo korist.
Europe must therefore take action to ensure that consumers reap the full benefit of an internal market that really is working for them.
Ali Komisija obravnava pregled direktive o paketnih potovanjih kot prednostno nalogo, glede na to, da se potrošniki pritožujejo zaradi hotelov, ki ne ustrezajo opisom, (zaradi) podjetij, ki oddajajo avtomobile v najem, in podjetij, ki gredo v stečaj in ne poskrbijo za svoje stranke?
Since consumers complain of problems with hotels not matching descriptions, with car rental companies and with companies going bankrupt but leaving them in dark, is the Commission treating the revision of the Package Travel Directive as a matter of priority?
Kako hitro je lahko po mnenju Komisije pripravljena revidirana direktiva, če se upošteva, da je obsežna presoja vpliva pomemben pogoj za pravno ukrepanje?
How soon does the Commission believe that a revised Directive can be produced, given that a comprehensive impact assessment is an important pre-requisite for legislative action?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, na katera ključna področja bi se morala revizija osredotočiti?
Could the Commission explain what key areas the revised version would address?
Kako in s kakšnimi ukrepi namerava Komisija obravnavati vprašanje odškodnin za potnike v primeru stečaja letalske družbe?
How, and with what kind of measures, does the Commission intend to address the issue of passenger compensation in the event of airline bankruptcy?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0148/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0148/09
Trgovina z ljudmi je moderna oblika suženjstva, za organiziran kriminal pa izjemno dobičkonosen posel.
Trafficking in human beings is a modern form of slavery and an extremely profitable business for organised crime.
Po ocenah Europola za leto 2009 se trgovina z ženskami za spolno izkoriščanje ni zmanjšala, povečuje pa se trgovina zaradi prisilnega dela.
Europol's assessment for 2009 is that trafficking of women for sexual exploitation has not decreased and trafficking for forced labour is on the increase.
Z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe bo predstavljen nov predlog, ki bo nadomestil predlog Komisije za okvirni sklep Sveta o preprečevanju trgovine z ljudmi in boju proti njej ter o varstvu žrtev.
Following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, a new proposal will be put forward to replace the Commission's proposal for a Council Framework Decision on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings, and protecting victims.
Ali se Svet strinja, da bi moral biti pristop EU na tem področju osredotočen na človekove pravice, celovit, da je treba pozornost nameniti zunanjim odnosom, politiki vračanja in ponovnega vključevanja, socialnim zadevam, socialnemu vključevanju, preseljevanju in azilu ter da bi moral pristop temeljiti na naslednjih prvinah:
Does the Council agree that the EU’s approach to action in this field should be human rights centred, holistic and focus on external relations, return and reintegration policies, social affairs, social inclusion, migration and asylum, and that the following key elements should be taken as a basis:
a. višina kazni in sankcij za tiste, ki imajo dobiček od trgovine z ljudmi, vključno s pravnimi osebami, bi morala odražati resnost kaznivega dejanja in imeti preprečevalen učinek;
a. the level of penalties and sanctions for those, legal persons included, who make a profit from trafficking in human beings should reflect the seriousness of the crime and have a dissuasive effect;
b. dodatni ukrepi bi morali biti osredotočeni na varstvo žrtev, pri čemer bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati položaj mladoletnih žrtev, tudi tako, da pomoč žrtvam ni pogojena in da ni nikoli pomembno, ali žrtev privoli v izkoriščanje;
b. further action should focus on protecting the victim, taking the situation of minors into due consideration, by, inter alia, ensuring that assistance to victims is unconditional and that the consent of a victim to exploitation is always irrelevant;
c. za zmanjševanje povpraševanja bi bili dodatni ukrepi lahko osredotočeni tudi na uporabnike storitev ljudi, s katerimi se trguje;
c. in order to discourage demand, further action could also focus on users of the services of trafficked people;
d. vsakršne določbe o pristojnosti bi morale biti usklajene z osnutkom okvirnega sklepa o preprečevanju in reševanju sporov o pristojnosti v kazenskih postopkih.
d. any provision on jurisdiction should be coordinated with the draft Framework Decision on prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings?
Ali namerava Svet izboljšati usklajevanje podatkov tako, da bi zaprosil Eurojust, Europol in agencijo Frontex, naj v posvetovanju z Agencijo za temeljne pravice, Inštitutom za enakost spolov in nevladnimi organizacijami vsako leto objavijo skupno poročilo o trgovini z ljudmi, ter tako, da bi podprl oblikovanje enotnega obrazca za države članice in tretje države za zbiranje podatkov o trgovini z ljudmi?
Does the Council aim to improve the coordination of information by asking Eurojust, Europol and Frontex, in consultation with the FRA, the Gender Institute and NGOs, to publish every year a joint report on trafficking in human beings, and by supporting the development of a common template for Member States and third countries for the collection of data relating to trafficking in human beings?
Katere konkretne ukrepe predvideva Svet za učinkovitejše preprečevanje trgovine z ljudmi?
What concrete action does the Council envisage in order to step up prevention of trafficking in human beings?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0149/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0149/09
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi moral biti pristop EU na tem področju osredotočen na človekove pravice in celovit, da je treba pozornost nameniti zunanjim odnosom, politiki vračanja in ponovnega vključevanja, socialnim zadevam, socialnemu vključevanju, preseljevanju in azilu ter da bi moral pristop temeljiti na naslednjih prvinah:
Does the Commission agree that the EU’s approach to action in this field should be human rights centred, holistic and focus on external relations, return and reintegration policies, social affairs, social inclusion, migration and asylum, and that the following key elements should be taken as a basis:
Ali namerava Komisija izboljšati usklajevanje podatkov tako, da bi zaprosila Eurojust, Europol in agencijo Frontex, naj v posvetovanju z Agencijo za temeljne pravice, Inštitutom za enakost spolov in nevladnimi organizacijami vsako leto objavijo skupno poročilo o trgovini z ljudmi, ter tako, da bi podprla oblikovanje enotnega obrazca za države članice in tretje države za zbiranje podatkov o trgovini z ljudmi?
Does the Commission aim to improve the coordination of information by asking Eurojust, Europol and Frontex, in consultation with the FRA, the Gender Institute and NGOs, to publish every year a joint report on trafficking in human beings, and by supporting the development of a common template for Member States and third countries for the collection of data relating to trafficking in human beings?
Katere konkretne ukrepe predvideva Komisija za učinkovitejše preprečevanje trgovine z ljudmi?
What concrete action does the Commission envisage in order to step up prevention of trafficking in human beings?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0150/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0150/09
Zadeva: Evropska strategija za Podonavje
Subject: European Strategy for the Danube Region
Donava v svojem skoraj 3000 km dolgem toku od Schwarzwalda v Nemčiji do Črnega morja povezuje deset evropskih držav, med njimi šest članic EU.
The Danube links ten European countries, six of them EU Member States, over its course of some 3000 km from the Black Forest (Germany) to the Black Sea.
Evropski svet je na zasedanju 18. in 19. junija 2009 pozval Komisijo, naj do 2011 pripravi evropsko strategijo za Podonavje.
The European Council of 18-19 June 2009 called on the Commission to draw up, by 2011, a European strategy for the Danube region.
Strategija za Podonavje bi morala izkoristiti prednosti mednarodnega sodelovanja med državami vzdolž Donave in razviti enoten pristop, ki bi se osredotočil na prednostna področja, kot so družbeni in gospodarski razvoj, varstvo okolja (zlasti zavarovanih naravnih rezervatov in čiste pitne vode), prevoz (tudi povezave z Renom prek kanala Ren-Majna-Donava), trajnostni turizem, znanstvena izmenjava, kulturna dediščina in jezikovna raznovrstnost v porečju Donave.
The strategy for the Danube Region, taking advantage of inter-territorial cooperation between countries along the Danube river, should develop a coherent approach and should concentrate on priority areas such as social and economic development, environmental protection (especially protected nature areas, and healthy drinking water), transport (including the connection with the Rhine, through the Rhine-Main-Danube Canal) and sustainable tourism, scientific exchange as well as cultural heritage and linguistic diversity in the Danube basin.
Eden glavnih dosežkov te delegacije je bilo oblikovanje medskupine Evropskega parlamenta za Donavo.
One of the main conclusions of this delegation was the creation of an EP Danube Intergroup.
Medskupina za Donavo bo tesno sodelovala z visokimi predstavniki držav ob Donavi, predstavniki regij in mest vzdolž Donave, Evropsko komisijo in drugimi evropskimi in mednarodnimi institucijami ter s koordinatorji prednostnih projektov za porečje Donave.
The Danube Intergroup will work closely with the top-level national representatives for the Danube, with the representatives of the regions and cities along the Danube river, with the European Commission and other European and international institutions, as well as with the coordinators of the priority projects for the Danube basin region.
Ali lahko Komisija, ob upoštevanju pomena, ki ga ima skladna strategija za Podonavje, posreduje informacije o razmerah pri oblikovanju strategije EU za Podonavje, o njenih prednostnih nalogah, o glavnih merilih za izbiranje projektov, ki bodo vključeni v akcijski načrt, tudi opredelitev ciljnega področja za strategijo EU za Podonavje, ter o časovnem razporedu za posamezne ukrepe?
In view of the importance of a coherent strategy concerning the Danube region, can the Commission provide information on the state of play regarding the elaboration of the EU strategy for the Danube region, its priorities, the principal criteria for selecting projects to be included in the action plan, including defining the territory to be targeted by the EU strategy for the Danube region, together with a timetable for the relevant actions?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0151/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0151/09
Zadeva: Izkušnje z uporabo uredb Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o higieni (ES) št. 852/2004, (ES) št. 853/2004 in (ES) št. 854/2004
Subject: Experience gained in applying the food hygiene Regulations of the European Parliament and the Council (EC) No 852/2004, (EC) No 853/2004 and (EC) No 854/2004
28. julija 2009 je Evropska komisija objavila sporočilo o stanju glede izvajanja tako imenovanega higienskega paketa.
On 28 July 2009 the Commission published a communication on progress in implementing the 'Food Hygiene Package'.
Na splošno je bilo ocenjeno, da ni bilo bistvenih težav, vendar poročilo večkrat navaja, da so se težave pojavile pri izvajanju higienskega paketa.
While the communication took the overall view that no significant problems had arisen, it did refer to a number of problems in implementing the package.
Zaradi teh težav in posledičnega podaljšanja prehodnih obdobij se postavljajo nekatera vprašanja.
These problems and the extension of the transitional periods that ensued raise a number of questions.
Komisijo sprašujem naslednje:
In view of the above, will the Commission say:
Kako Komisije ocenjuje rezultate v zvezi s tem in koliko srednje velikih podjetij ni bilo mogoče odobriti (razvrščeno po državah)?
How does the Commission judge the result in this connection and how many small and medium-sized enterprises were refused a licence (arranged by country)?
Kakšni so bili ukrepi, da je bila pri uporabi te prožnosti zagotovljena pravna varnost uradnih organov na terenu?
Which measures were introduced to ensure legal certainty for the public authorities on the ground in applying this flexibility?
V uredbah so informacije o živilski verigi zelo strogo opredeljene.
Information on the food chain in the Regulations is interpreted very narrowly.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi morali s spremembo uredb to opredelitev zrahljati?
Does the Commission agree that the Regulations should be amended to make them less restrictive?
V Uredbi (ES) št. 882/2004 se zahteva akreditacija laboratorijev.
Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 calls for the accreditation of laboratories.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da zahtevani evropski standardi iz člena 12(2) za občine pomenijo velike naložbe in da jih je treba preveriti, tako da bi bila akreditacija bolj odvisna od strokovne usposobljenosti, ki bi se preverjala z nenapovedanimi kontrolami, kot pa od gradbenih ukrepov, ki zahtevajo velike naložbe?
Does the Commission agree that the European Standards set out in Article 12 (2) require a high level of investment by municipalities and that they should be reviewed with a view to making accreditation more dependent on technical competence, verified by spot checks, than on building measures requiring a high level of investment?
UL L 139, 30.4.2004, str.
OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p.
UL L 165, 30.4.2004, str.
OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0152/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0152/09
, v imenu skupine EFD
, on behalf of the EFD Group
Zadeva: Obramba načela subsidiarnosti
Subject: Defence of the principle of subsidiarity
– je v členu 6(2) nove Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), ki je ravnokar začela veljati, določen pravni okvir za pristop EU k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin;
– Article 6(2) of the new Treaty of European Union (TEU), which has just entered into force, defines the legal framework for EU accession to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR).
– v skladu s tretjim odstavkom tega člena temeljne pravice, kakor jih zagotavlja Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin in kakor izhajajo iz skupnega ustavnega izročila držav članic, spadajo k pravu Unije kot splošna načela;
– Paragraph 3 of that article states that fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, constitute general principles of the Union's law.
Ali Komisija meni, da je razsodba Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice resna kršitev temeljnega načela subsidiarnosti?
Does the Commission regard the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights as a serious violation of the fundamental principle of subsidiarity?
Ali je ta razsodba združljiva s spoštovanjem nacionalnih identitet držav članic in njihovih regionalnih razsežnosti, kakor to določa člen 4(2)?
Is that ruling compatible with the requirement for the EU to respect the national identities of Member States and their constituent regions, as stated in Article 4(2) of the TEU?
Kako namerava Komisija izrecno spodbijati neuporabnost takih razsodb in zakonskih določb v bodočem pravnem okviru EU, ki ga določa lizbonska pogodba?
How will the Commission explicitly challenge the applicability of such a ruling and such law in the future legal framework of the EU under the Treaty of Lisbon?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0153/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0153/09
Zadeva: Usklajevalni organ s področja boja proti drogam na evropski ravni
Subject: Control at EU level in the fight against drugs
Ob upoštevanju podatkov Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami, ki so bili nedavno predstavljeni Evropskemu parlamentu;
The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction recently set out its data before Parliament.
ker je treba poudariti, da strategija EU o boju proti drogam zajema obdobje 2005/2012 in zahteva enotnejši in učinkovitejši pristop;
The EU drugs strategy covers the period 2005-2012 and it is clear that a more uniform and assertive approach is required.
ob upoštevanju stališča, da mora biti politika preprečevanja in rehabilitacije, zlasti v zvezi z drogami, usklajena s politiko omejevanja tveganja in zmanjševanja obsega škode;
We believe that the prevention and rehabilitation policy, in particular with regard to drugs, should be coordinated with a risk limitation and damage reduction policy.
ker je ugotovljeno, da je skladnost zahtevanega delovanja odvisna od načrtovanja in vzpostavitve usklajevalnega organa EU za trdnejši nadzor nad pojavom, ali od vzpostavitve sistema kroženja informacij med odborom LIBE, Evropsko komisijo, Evropskim centrom za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami in državami članicami, ki ga je treba redno pregledovati;
In order for the required action to be uniform, the EU should first set up a 'control room' to ensure firmer governance of the issue or, alternatively, establish a system whereby information circulates between the LIBE Committee, the Commission, Europol, the EMCDDA and the Member States, and is regularly evaluated.
1. okrepiti sodelovanje s pristojnimi ministrstvi držav članic, pokrajinami in civilno družbo za boljše razumevanje pojava in bolj ciljno usmerjenost pobud;
1. strengthen cooperation with the ministries responsible in the Member States, with the regional authorities and with civil society, with a view to better understanding the issue and obtaining guidance on which to base its measures;
2. ponovno pregledati politiko preprečevanja in rehabilitacije, zlasti v povezavi z zasvojenostjo, in boja proti zasvojenosti;
2. review its policy to combat, prevent and rehabilitate, in particular with regard to drug addiction;
3. vzpostaviti usklajevalni organ na evropski ravni, da se popravi sedanje pomanjkanje usklajevanja, ali vzpostaviti sistem kroženja informacij med organi, omenjenimi v uvodu.
3. set up a coordinating body at EU level to improve the lack of coordination or, alternatively, establish a system to ensure that information circulates between the above-mentioned bodies?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0154/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0154/09
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0155/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0155/09
Zadeva: Procesne pravice v kazenskih postopkih
Subject: Procedural rights in criminal proceedings
Evropski parlament že dolgo poziva k sprejetju pravnega instrumenta o procesnih pravicah v kazenskih zadevah.
The European Parliament has been calling for a legal instrument on procedural rights in criminal matters for a long time.
Evropska komisija je leta 2004 predstavila predlog okvirnega sklepa s tega področja, vendar države članice niso dosegle soglasja.
A proposal for a Framework Decision in this field was presented by the European Commission in 2004 but no agreement was reached by the Member States.
Pogajanja o predlaganem okvirnem sklepu iz leta 2009 o pravici do tolmačenja in prevajanja in spremljajočemu priporočilu so bila plodna, vendar so bila kljub temu prekinjena zaradi novega institucionalnega okvira, ki ga je uvedla Lizbonska pogodba, čeprav je bila sprejeta resolucija o načrtu za krepitev procesnih pravic osumljenih ali obtoženih oseb v kazenskih postopkih.
Negotiations on the 2009 proposed Framework Decision on rights to interpretation and translation and the accompanying recommendation, while fruitful, have been paused in view of the new institutional framework introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, although the resolution on a roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings was adopted.
Švedsko predsedstvo je izrazilo svojo zavezanost k napredovanju na tem področju.
The Swedish Presidency has shown its commitment to making progress on this subject.
Ali Svet soglaša z Evropskim parlamentom, da je nadaljevanje dela v zvezi s tem vprašanjem prednostna naloga?
Does the Council agree with the European Parliament that work should continue on this subject as a priority matter?
Katere pobude v zvezi s procesnimi pravicami bo sprožil ali spodbudil, v kakšnem časovnem okviru in kakšno bo njihovo področje delovanja?
What initiatives will it pursue or encourage on procedural rights, with what scope and on what timetable?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0156/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0156/09
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti sedaj?
What does the Commission now intend to do?
Namerava vložiti predlog direktive o vrsti procesnih pravic?
Does it envisage tabling a proposal for a directive on a range of procedural rights?