natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali se je Komisija strinjala, da bodo kmetijski proizvodi, prodani posrednikom, oproščeni DDV?
Has the Commission approved the exemption from VAT of the sale of agricultural products to intermediaries?
Če se je strinjala, zakaj?
If so, why?
Ali Komisija meni, da bo ta mehanizem vnesel spremembe v vzorce trgovanja s kmetijskimi proizvodi v Romuniji?
Does the Commission consider that such a system will result in a change in trade patterns for agricultural products in Romania?
Ali Komisija meni, da bo konkurenca na notranjem trgu izkrivljena, če damo finančne spodbude kmetom, da svoje proizvode prodajajo določenim kupcem?
Does the Commission consider that it will create a distortion of competition on the internal market if financial incentives are given to farmers to sell their products to certain customers?
Ali Komisija namerava zagotoviti, da se bo skupni sistem DDV uporabljal za vse romunske kmete?
Will the Commission ensure that common VAT regulations apply to all agricultural producers in Romania?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000087/2011
Question for Question Time H-000087/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Podpora malim in srednjim podjetjem v evroobmočju
(ALDE) Subject: Supporting SMEs in the euro area
V evropskem aktu za mala podjetja je zapisano, da se bo Evropa lažje spoprijela z negotovostjo današnjega globaliziranega sveta z živahnimi malimi in srednjimi podjetji.
The EU Small Business Act states that ‘vibrant SMEs will make Europe more robust to stand against the uncertainty encountered in the globalised world of today’.
Ta podjetja so izrednega pomena, saj predstavljajo 70 % vseh zaposlitev v evroobmočju.
SMEs are of high importance given that they account for 70% of all employment in the euro area.
Ali lahko Svet navede, kateri ukrepi so bili na ravni EU sprejeti v podporo malim in srednjim podjetjem v Uniji?
Can the Council outline what measures are being taken at EU level to support SMEs in the EU?
Za mala in srednja podjetja je danes velika ovira dostop do financ.
Access to finance is a major stumbling block for SMEs at present.
Kakšni ukrepi bi bili lahko sprejeti na ravni EU, da bi tem podjetjem pomagali ohraniti njihov obstoj in konkurenčnost?
What steps can be taken at EU level to help SMEs remain viable and competitive?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000088/2011/rev.1
Question for Question Time H-000088/2011/rev.1
(ALDE) Zadeva: Trgovinska pogajanja med EU in Mercosurjem
(ALDE) Subject: EU-Mercosur trade negotiations
Ali lahko Komisija pred srečanjem med EU in državami Mercosurja, ki je predvideno marca, poda poročilo o izidu zadnjih treh krogov pogovorov?
Given that a meeting between EU and Mercosur countries is scheduled for next March, can the Commission give an account of the outcomes of the last three rounds of meetings?
Komisija je dejala, da bo sporazum obsežen, ambiciozen in bo presegal zgolj obveznosti Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, upoštevane pa bodo tudi posebnosti posameznih proizvodov in sektorjev.
The Commission has said that this agreement will be comprehensive and ambitious, going beyond World Trade Organisation obligations, and will include sensitive issues as regards specific products and sectors.
Ali lahko Komisija podrobneje pojasni, na kakšen način zagotavlja, da so interesi evropskih kmetov, še zlasti živinorejcev in govedorejcev, zadostno upoštevani?
Can the Commission provide further information on what it is doing to ensure that the interests of European farmers, including beef and livestock farmers, are being properly taken into account?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da evropski kmetje ne bodo izrinjeni s trga zaradi cenejših uvoženih proizvodov, ki pa dosegajo nižje standarde, kar zadeva okolje, zdravje živali in rastlin ter zdravstvena vprašanja?
What will the Commission do to ensure that European farmers are not pushed out of the market because of cheaper imports that are being produced to a lower standard as regards the environment, plant and animal welfare, and health issues?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000089/2011
Question for Question Time H-000089/2011
(ECR) Zadeva: Protidampinške dajatve na steklena vlakna (AD549)
(ECR) Subject: Anti-dumping duties on fibreglass (AD549)
Svet bo kmalu v Odboru stalnih predstavnikov (COREPER) sprejel predlog Komisije za protidumpinške tarife na steklena vlakna (AD549).
The Council is on the point of adopting in COREPER a Commission proposal for anti-dumping tariffs on fibreglass (AD549).
Steklena vlakna so glavna sestavina vetrnih turbin, ki so pomembne za boj EU proti podnebnim spremembam ter imajo pomembno vlogo pri uresničevanju ciljev 20–20–20.
Fibreglass is the main component of wind turbines, a flagship for the EU’s fight against climate change and a major component towards its 20-20-20 goals.
Ali se Svet strinja, da je bilo premalo posvetovanja, saj se po eni strani spodbuja in subvencionira vetrno energijo v državah članicah, po drugi pa se temu sektorju nalaga denarne kazni?
Does the Council agree that there has been a lack of joined-up thinking as it promotes and subsidises wind energy in Member States with one hand, only to penalise it financially with the other?
Ali je Svet zadovoljen s tem, da je mogoče v delovni skupini sprejeti ukrep s samo štirimi glasovi za od 27?
Is the Council content to see that a measure can be adopted in Working Group with as few as only four votes in favour out of 27?
Ali bo poleg tega madžarsko predsedstvo, katerega država je bila ena od devetih držav članic, ki so v delovni skupini glasovale proti predlogu, glede na pomanjkanje podpore in ustreznih informacij o učinkih ukrepa priporočilo, da se o njem ustrezno razpravlja v Odboru stalnih predstavnikov ali da se to vprašanje ponovno vrne na raven odborov?
Furthermore, in light of the obvious lack of support and proper information about the effects of the measure, will the Hungarian presidency, whose country was one of the nine Member States who voted against in the Working Group, recommend that this measure be debated properly in COREPER or be referred back to the committee stage?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000090/2011
Question for Question Time H-000090/2011
(ECR) Zadeva: Pravice intelektualne lastnine za inovacije v okviru pogajanj o prostotrgovinskem sporazumu EU-Indija
(ECR) Subject: IPR for innovation within the EU-India FTA negotiations
Trgovinska politika Evropske unije ima pomembno vlogo pri uresničevanju ciljev strategije EU 2020, denimo s sklepanjem sporazumov o prosti trgovini.
The EU’s trade policy has an important role to play in attaining the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy, by means, inter alia, of concluding Free Trade Agreements (FTA).
Indija, ki spada med najhitreje rastoča gospodarstva na svetu, bo v prihodnjih letih postala ključna strateška partnerica EU.
As one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, India is set to become a key strategic partner of the EU in the coming years.
Sporazum o prosti trgovini bo odprl nove naložbene priložnosti za evropska podjetja v Indiji ter okrepil dostop do trgov tako za evropska kot indijska podjetja.
An FTA will further increase investment opportunities for European companies in India, and enhance access to markets both for European and for Indian firms.
Ugodnosti trgovine bodo po vsej možnosti pomagale milijonom Indijcev pri izhodu iz revščine.
The benefits of trade are likely to help lift millions of Indians out of poverty.
Indija se približuje temu, da postane na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo, inovacije pa imajo večjo vlogo v njenem gospodarstvu, zato bodo tudi evropska podjetja z vlaganjem prispevala k spodbujanju inovacij.
As India goes further down the road towards becoming a knowledge-based economy and innovation plays a greater role in the Indian economy, investment by innovative European companies will also help to foster innovation.
Vendar inovacije slonijo na ustrezni ureditvi pravic intelektualne lastnine.
However, innovation relies on a sound intellectual property rights framework.
Če plodovi inovacij ne bodo zaščiteni, to za podjetja z vidika vlaganj ne bo preveč spodbudno.
Unless the fruits of innovation can be protected, there is little incentive for innovative companies to invest.
Kako Komisija upošteva pomen pravic intelektualne lastnine na področju inovacij v okviru sedanjih pogajanj o prostotrgovinskem sporazumu z Indijo?
How is the Commission taking into account the importance of intellectual property rights for innovation in the current negotiations for an FTA with India?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000091/2011
Question for Question Time H-000091/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Preklic dovoljenja za letošnjo parado ponosa v Budimpešti
(ALDE) Subject: Withdrawal of permission for this year's Pride Parade in Budapest
Madžarski policijski organi so preklicali dovoljenje za letošnjo parado ponosa v Budimpešti.
The Hungarian police authority has withdrawn permission for this year’s Pride Parade in Budapest.
Organizatorji parade so zaprosili za dovoljenje za spremembo poti in pohod mimo madžarskega parlamenta, kar je bilo zavrnjeno.
The arrangers of the Parade had requested permission to alter the route and march past the Hungarian Parliament, which was refused.
Nekaj dni kasneje je policija preklicala dovoljenje za izvedbo pohoda v celoti.
A few days later the police withdrew permission to hold the march altogether.
Ali bo Svet zahteval razlago, zakaj je bilo preklicano dovoljenje za parado ponosa v Budimpešti?
Will the Council request an explanation why permission for the Pride Parade in Budapest was withdrawn?
Ali lahko Svet glede na nedavno poročilo EU z ugotovitvami, da se v Evropski uniji še vedno dogajata nasilje in diskriminacija, povezana s sovraštvom, navede ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da vse države članice spoštujejo pravice lezbijk, gejev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev?
In the light of the EU report which recently found that both hate crime related violence and discrimination still occur in the EU, will the Council please state what measures will be taken to ensure that all Member States respect the rights of LGBT people?
Organizatorji parade ponosa so nameravali odkrito kritizirati novi madžarski zakon o medijih.
The arrangers of the Pride Parade had intended to openly criticise Hungary’s new media law.
Ali to dejstvo vpliva na mnenje Sveta o dogajanju, povezanem z madžarskim medijskim zakonom?
Does this fact affect the Council’s view of developments concerning the Hungarian media law?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000092/2011
Question for Question Time H-000092/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Preklic dovoljenja za letošnjo parado ponosa v Budimpešti
(ALDE) Subject: Withdrawal of authorisation for this year's Pride Parade in Budapest
Madžarski policijski organi so preklicali dovoljenje za letošnjo parado ponosa v Budimpešti.
Hungary’s police authorities have withdrawn permission for this year’s Pride Parade in Budapest.
Organizatorji parade so zaprosili za dovoljenje za spremembo poti in pohod mimo parlamenta, kar je bilo zavrnjeno.
The organisers of the Parade had requested permission to alter the route, which would have involved marching past Parliament, but permission for this was denied.
Nekaj dni kasneje je policija preklicala dovoljenje za pohod v celoti.
A few days later the police withdrew permission for the march altogether.
Ali bo Komisija zahtevala razlago, zakaj je bilo preklicano dovoljenje za parado ponosa v Budimpešti?
Will the Commission request an explanation of the reasons for which permission for the Pride Parade in Budapest was withdrawn?
Ali lahko Komisija glede na nedavno poročilo EU z navedbami, da se v Evropski uniji še vedno dogajata nasilje in diskriminacija, povezana s sovraštvom, navede ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da vse države članice spoštujejo pravice lezbijk, gejev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev?
In the light of the EU report which recently stated that both hate-crime-related violence and discrimination still occur in the EU, would the Commission indicate what measures it will take to ensure that all Member States respect the rights of LGBTQ persons?
Organizatorji parade ponosa so nameravali odkrito kritizirati novi madžarski zakon o medijih.
The organisers of the Pride Parade had intended to openly criticise Hungary’s new Media Law.
Ali to dejstvo vpliva na mnenje Komisije o dogajanju, povezanem z madžarskim medijskim zakonom?
Does this fact affect the Commission’s view of developments in relation to Hungary’s Media Law?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000093/2011/rev.1
Question for Question Time H-000093/2011/rev.1
(ALDE) Zadeva: Športna politika EU
(ALDE) Subject: EU Sports Policy
Ali lahko Svet navede, katere pobude bo sprejel na področju športne politike v letu 2011?
Can the Council outline what initiatives it will undertake in the area of sports policy during 2011?
EU je po sprejetju Lizbonske pogodbe dobila pristojnost sodelovanja na področju športa in leto 2011 je evropsko leto prostovoljcev.
Co-operation on sports issues is an EU competence following the adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon and 2011 is dedicated to the European year of the volunteer.
Ali EU namerava sprejeti posebne ukrepe glede športnih struktur, zlasti tistih, ki temeljijo na dejavnosti prostovoljcev v letu 2011?
Are there specific actions to be undertaken by the EU in relation to sport structures, in particular, those based on voluntary activity during 2011?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000094/2011
Question for Question Time H-000094/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Morebitne spremembe memoranduma o soglasju med Irsko, EU in Mednarodnim denarnim skladom
(ALDE) Subject: Possible changes to the Memorandum of Understanding between Ireland, the EU and the IMF
Ali lahko Komisija izjavi, če bodo imela tekoča pogajanja za vzpostavitev stalnega evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost, ki naj bi se zaključila na marčevskem vrhu Evropskega sveta, kakršne koli posledice za memorandum o soglasju med irsko vlado, EU in Mednarodnim denarnim skladom, oziroma ali bodo privedla do sprememb memoranduma?
Can the Commission say whether the ongoing talks to establish a permanent European Stability Mechanism due to conclude at the March European Council Summit will have any implications for, or result in changes to, the Memorandum of Understanding between the Irish Government, the EU and the IMF?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000095/2011
Question for Question Time H-000095/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Zmanjševanje osipa v šolah
(ALDE) Subject: Reducing school drop-out rates
Ali lahko Svet pojasni, katere ukrepe bo sprejel za zmanjšanje števila mladih, ki zapustijo šolo brez osnovne stopnje izobrazbe?
Can the Council outline what measures it will take to reduce the numbers of young people leaving school without a basic qualification?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000096/2011
Question for Question Time H-000096/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Nadomestno materinstvo
(PPE) Subject: Surrogate motherhood
Številne zdravstvene raziskovalne ustanove v EU pomagajo parom pri uresničenju njihovih sanj o otroku s pomočjo nadomestnega materinstva.
Numerous medical research establishments in the EU assist couples in achieving their dream of having a child with the help of surrogate motherhood.
Ta reprodukcijska metoda je v številnih državah članicah odobrena ali določena z zakonom, v drugih državah članicah pa je z zakonom prepovedana in zato kazniva.
This method of reproduction is authorised or laid down by law in a number of Member States, whilst in other Member States it is prohibited by law and therefore punishable.
Ta neenaka pravna obravnava v EU spodbuja nezakonito trgovino, tudi in zlasti v tretje države.
This unequal legal treatment within the EU encourages trafficking, including, in particular, to third countries.
V EU je o tej občutljivi temi potrebno doseči usklajeno stališče.
A coordinated stance within the EU is needed on this sensitive issue.
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi pregled zakonskih ureditev 27 držav članic glede nadomestnega materinstva?
Could the Commission give an overview of the legal situation with regard to surrogate motherhood in the 27 Member States?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena, ob dolžnem spoštovanju načela subsidiarnosti, začeti z iskanjem načina za boljšo usklajenost v EU v kratkem času?
Is the Commission prepared, with due respect for the principle of subsidiarity, to initiate steps to explore how better coordination can be achieved within the EU within a short time frame?
Kako Komisija gleda na stališče, da je nadomestno materinstvo sprejemljivo le, ko je to z medicinskega stališča potrebno?
How does the Commission view the position that surrogate motherhood is only acceptable in cases of medical necessity?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi morali imeti otroci, rojeni s pomočjo metode nadomestnega materinstva, podobno pravno zaščito kot posvojeni otroci?
Does the Commission consider that children born by the surrogate motherhood method should have similar legal protection to adopted children?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000097/2011
Question for Question Time H-000097/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Davčne oaze
(ALDE) Subject: Tax havens
Kakšna je politika EU glede davčnih oaz in davčne pravičnosti?
What is the EU policy on tax havens and tax justice?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000098/2011
Question for Question Time H-000098/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Vaje bojnih skupin
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Battle group exercises
Grške oborožene sile so 3. in 4. februarja 2011 v četrti Argyroupoli v mestu Kilkis pod poveljstvom 71. letalske brigade v okviru bojnih skupin EU izvedle vajo za razgon demonstracij s kodnim imenom „Kalimahos“.
On 3 and 4 February 2011, in Argyroupoli Kilkis, the Greek armed forces conducted an exercise for breaking up demonstrations, under the responsibility of the 71st air brigade, as part of the EU battle groups, under the name of 'Kallimachos'.
Vojaki, ki so predstavljali demonstrante, so nosili transparente z napisi „Go home, we want peace“ in skandirali „Freedom“, iz česar je mogoče sklepati, da je bila ta vaja namenjena razgonu miroljubnih in protiimperialističnih demonstracij.
Soldiers representing demonstrators carried banners with the slogan 'Go home, we want peace' and chanted 'Freedom', which implies that this exercise concerns breaking up pacifist and anti-imperialist demonstrations.
Ta vaja je del usposabljanja za pripravo bojnih skupin EU in Natovih enot na razgon ljudskih demonstracij ter temelji na prednostnih nalogah nove doktrine Nata in SZVP.
The exercise forms part of the training to prepare EU battle groups and NATO troops to break up people's protests, and is based on the priorities of the new NATO and CFSP doctrine.
Pri tej in prejšnjih podobnih vajah je bilo jasno, da so usmerjene proti prebivalstvu Grčije in drugih držav.
This and previous similar exercises are clearly targeted at the people of Greece and other countries.
Ali Svet obsoja te vaje za razgon in zadušitev ljudskih demonstracij?
Does the Council condemn these exercises for breaking up and putting down people's protests?
Kdaj namerava odpraviti bojne skupine EU in prenehati s posredovanji zunaj Evrope?
When does it intend to disband EU battle groups and operations outside Europe?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000099/2011
Question for Question Time H-000099/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Sistem socialne varnosti v Grčiji
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Social welfare in Greece
Po podatkih ministrstva za zdravje v državi 97 struktur za socialno varnost, ki delujejo zelo pomanjkljivo, od 6203 statutarnih delovnih mest v teh ustanovah pa jih je 3244 (oziroma 52,12 %) prostih.
According to the Ministry of Health, Greece's 97 social welfare facilities are severely deficient, and 3 244 (or 52.12 %) of the 6 203 statutory posts are vacant.
Letos se je prispevek sistemu socialnega varstva iz javnega proračuna znižal za 168 milijonov EUR.
This year, the amount of public funding allocated to social welfare has dropped by EUR 168 million.
Ali Komisija obsoja politiko omejevanja proračuna, ki se izvaja nad zdravstvenim sistemom in sistemom socialne varnosti v Grčiji, pa tudi privatizacijo in odsotnost odgovornosti države na tem področju?
Does the Commission condemn the cuts in spending on health and social welfare in Greece, as well as the privatisations and the state's lack of involvement in this area?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000100/2011
Question for Question Time H-000100/2011
Nedavna raziskava družbe Ernst & Young o vplivu skupne konsolidirane davčne osnove za pravne osebe na evropska podjetja kaže, da bi uvedba take osnove pomenila višje stroške usklajevanja, višje dejanske davčne stopnje, negotovost glede davčnih stopenj in bi škodila Evropski uniji kot kraju za naložbe.
Recent research carried out by Ernst & Young on the impact of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) on European business show that a CCCTB would result in higher compliance costs, higher effective tax rates, uncertainty around tax rates and damage to the European Union as an investment location.
Ali lahko Komisija poda izjavo v odgovor na te ugotovitve?
Can the Commission make a statement in response to these findings?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000101/2011
Question for Question Time H-000101/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Odstopanje od proračunskih ciljev v Grčiji in privatizacija
(PPE) Subject: Deviation from budget targets in Greece and privatisations
Komisijo pozivamo, naj odgovori na vprašanje o spremembah pri izvajanju programa konsolidacije proračuna v Grčiji ter vlogi in ciljih privatizacije.
I would like to ask the Commission a question on developments in budget consolidation in Greece, and the role and aim of privatisations.
Program privatizacije je prvotno za leti 2011–2012 predvideval prihodek v višini 3 milijard evrov.
The privatisation programme was initially intended to bring in proceeds of EUR 3 billion in the two years 2011-2012.
Kaj je vplivalo na to revalorizacijo dohodkov od privatizacije?
Why did the figure for privatisation proceeds need to be revised?
Kateri element je bil v začetku napačen?
Which factor was incorrectly estimated in the beginning?
Kje je prišlo do napake?
What has not happened as it should have?
Ali se je od zastavljenih ciljev oddaljil program javnofinančne prilagoditve grške vlade?
Has the Greek Government’s budget adjustment programme deviated from its targets?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi bilo možno v Grčiji javne prihodke povečati, zlasti s privatizacijo?
Does the Commission believe it is possible to increase revenue, notably from privatisations, in Greece?
Na katerih področjih (javne službe, javne dobrine)?
In which fields (public services, public property)?
Po kakšnem postopku (uporaba, prodaja)?
And employing which procedures (utilisation, sale)?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000102/2011
Question for Question Time H-000102/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Uvedba enotnih kontaktnih točk, predvidenih v direktivi o storitvah, v državah članicah
(S&D) Subject: Setting up points of single contact in Member States as required by the Services Directive
V direktivi o storitvah, sprejeti leta 2006, je predvidena uvedba enotnih kontaktnih točk v državah članicah.
The 2006 Services Directive provides for points of single contact to be set up in the Member States.
Gre za enega najpomembnejših elementov učinkovitega izvajanja direktive in pomemben vir informacij za ponudnike storitev, ki želijo zagotavljati čezmejne storitve ali ustanoviti svoj sedež v drugi državi članici.
These points of single contact are one of the key aspects of effectively implementing the directive, and represent a vital source of information for those wishing to provide cross-border services or set up business in another Member State.
To zadeva zlasti male ponudnike storitev, ki pogosto nimajo finančnih sredstev za posvetovanje o delovni in davčni zakonodaji, ki veljata v drugi državi članici Evropske unije, o postopkih za ustanovitev sedeža itd.
They are especially useful for small-scale service providers who often cannot afford consultations on another EU Member State's employment law, tax law, procedures for setting up businesses, and so on.
Enotne kontaktne točke v nekaterih državah članicah sploh niso bile uveden ali pa ne delujejo dovolj dobro in torej ne zagotavljajo popolnih informacij, ki jih potrebujejo ponudniki storitev.
In some Member States, points of single contact have not been set up or do not work well enough, insofar as they do not provide the comprehensive information that service providers need.