natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V okviru sporazuma med Evropskimi skupnostmi, državami članicami pogodbenicami tega sporazuma in podjetjem Philip Morris International bo slednje ES in državam članicam v naslednjih 12 letih izplačalo denarna sredstva v skupni višini 1,25 milijarde USD.
Under the agreement concluded between the European Community and the Member States parties to that agreement and Philip Morris International, the latter will make monetary payments to the EC and the Member States totalling USD 1.25 billion over the next 12 years.
Ali se Svet ne strinja, da bi moral proračunski organ (Svet in Parlament) začeti posvetovanja o razporeditvi in morebitni uporabi sredstev, ki izhajajo iz omenjenega sporazuma, zlasti za namen boja proti goljufijam, vključno s tihotapljenjem cigaret?
Does not the Council agree that it is necessary that the budgetary authority (Council and Parliament) initiate consultations on the allocation and possible use of those funds deriving from the agreement in particular as regards the fight against fraud including cigarette smuggling?
Ali lahko Svet potrdi, da je v treba v duhu sporazuma pravičen delež sredstev, ki izhajajo iz njega, nameniti za boj proti goljufijam?
Can the Council confirm that it is in the spirit of the above mentioned agreement that a fair share of these funds proceeding from it should be devoted to combating fraud?
Ali lahko potrdi, da bodo ta sredstva uvrščena na ustrezno proračunsko postavko?
Can it confirm that these funds will be allocated to the appropriate budget line?
Ali lahko Svet navede znesek (v odstotkih od 1,25 milijarde USD), ki bi ga bilo z njegovega stališča treba nameniti na eni strani državam članicam in na drugi v proračun Evropske unije?
Can the Council indicate the amount (as a percentage of the USD 1.25 billion) it thinks would be appropriate to be allocated to the Member States on the one hand and to the European Union Budget on the other hand?
Ali lahko Svet potrdi namero, da se bodo zneski iz denarnih izplačil državam članicam uporabili za financiranje dejavnosti boja proti goljufijam, kot je predlagano v sporazumu?
Can the Council confirm that there is the intention that the amounts from these monetary payments that will be paid to Member States will be used for the purpose of financing activities to combat fraud as it is suggested in the agreement?
Ali lahko Svet potrdi, da namerava skupaj z državami članicami podpreti pobudo Komisije, da se nameni več sredstev za boj proti goljufijam?
Can the Council confirm that along with Member States it intends to support Commission initiatives to allocate more means for the fight against fraud?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAV O-0047/05/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0047/05/rev.1
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi moral proračunski organ (Svet in Parlament) začeti posvetovanja o razporeditvi in morebitni uporabi sredstev, ki izhajajo iz omenjenega sporazuma, zlasti za namen boja proti goljufijam, vključno s tihotapljenjem cigaret?
Does not the Commission agree that it is necessary that the budgetary authority (Council and Parliament) initiate consultations on the allocation and possible use of those funds deriving from the agreement in particular as regards the fight against fraud including cigarette smuggling?
Ali lahko Komisija potrdi, da je v treba v duhu sporazuma pravičen delež sredstev, ki izhajajo iz sporazuma, nameniti za boj proti goljufijam?
Can the Commission confirm that it is in the spirit of the above mentioned agreement that a fair share of these funds proceeding from it should be devoted to combating fraud?
Ali lahko Komisija navede znesek (v odstotkih od 1,25 milijarde USD), ki bi ga bilo z njenega stališča treba nameniti na eni strani državam članicam in na drugi v proračun Evropske unije?
Can the Commission indicate the amount (as a percentage of the USD 1.25 billion) it thinks would be appropriate to be allocated to the Member States on the one hand and to the European Union Budget on the other hand?
Ali lahko Komisija navede ukrepe, s katerimi namerava zagotoviti, da bo pravičen delež teh prihodkov uvrščen v proračun Skupnosti?
Can the Commission indicate the steps it intends to take in order to ensure that a fair share of these revenues will be entered in the Community budget?
Ali lahko zagotovi, da bodo ta sredstva namenjena za boj proti goljufijam?
Can it confirm that these amounts will be earmarked for the fight against fraud?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0048/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0048/05
Zadeva: Diskriminacija delavcev in podjetij iz novih držav članic na notranjem trgu EU
Subject: Discrimination against workers and companies from the new Member States in the EU internal market
Poleg določb pristopne pogodbe o prehodnem obdobju za prosti pretok delovne sile obstajajo v nekaterih od EU15 dodatne zakonodajne in administrativne ovire, ki podjetjem, zakonito ustanovljenim v novih državah članicah, in njihovim delavcem preprečujejo uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz Pogodbe, do svobode ustanavljanja in opravljanja gospodarskih dejavnosti v EU15.
Apart from the Accession Treaty provisions on transitional periods for the free movement of labour, there are additional legislative and administrative obstacles in several ‘EU 15’ Member States which are preventing companies, legally established in the new Member States, and their workers, from exercising their Treaty rights of freedom of establishment and of conducting economic activities in these ‘EU 15’ Member States.
Ovire po nacionalni zakonodaji teh držav članic vključujejo zapletenejše in dolgotrajnejše notifikacijske postopke za ponudnike storitev iz novih držav članic kot za tiste iz EU15, ter zahtevo, da se zaprosi za delovna dovoljenja za delavce, napotene na delo v drugo državo v okviru opravljanja storitev.
Obstacles under the national law of these Member States include more complicated and time-consuming notification procedures for providers of services from the new Member States than those from the ‘EU 15’ Member States, as well as the requirement to apply for work permits for posted workers in the framework of provision of services.
Po tej zakonodaji se torej podjetja iz novih držav članic obravnavajo kot podjetja izven EU.
Under this legislation, new Member States’ companies are, in this respect, treated as companies from outside the EU.
Po zakonodaji drugih držav članic EU je potrebno delovno dovoljenje za napotene delavce iz novih držav članic, kar je v nasprotju s členom 49 Pogodbe o Evropski skupnosti.
In the law of the other EU states, a work permit for delegated workers from new Member States is required, in breach of Article 49 of the European Community Treaty.
Diskriminacija nekaterih držav članic sega od pretiranega preverjanja ponudnikov storitev do uradnikov, odgovornih za izdajanje raznih dovoljenj podjetjem in delavcem, ki niso dovolj dobro seznanjeni z zakonodajo svoje države in EU.
As far as the discriminatory practices of some Member States are concerned, these range from an exaggerated level of checks on a service provider, to the officials responsible for granting various authorisations to such companies and workers being insufficiently familiar with the law of their own country and of the EU.
Kako in v kolikšnem času se bo Komisija posvetila temu položaju in sprejela ukrepe za odpravo te diskriminatorne ureditve, ki ovira uresničevanje lizbonske strategije?
How, and within what time frame, will the Commission address this situation, by taking steps aimed at eliminating such discriminatory arrangements, which hinder the realisation of the Lisbon Agenda?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0049/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0049/05
, v imenu Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve
, on behalf of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Zadeva: Dosežen napredek v letu 2004 pri vzpostavljanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice (OSVP) (člen 2 PES in člen 39 PEU)
Subject: Progress in 2004 on the development of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) (Article 2 ECT and Article 39 TEU)
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da Pogodba o Ustavi za Evropo krepi preglednost in demokratični nadzor območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ali se Svet obvezuje, da:
Given that the Constitutional Treaty reinforces transparency and democratic accountability as regards the AFSJ, does the Council undertake in these areas:
bo predvidel prehod na uporabo postopka soodločanja za področje zakonitega priseljevanja in integracije?
to provide for a change to codecision for legal immigration and integration?
bo Evropskemu in nacionalnim parlamentom omogočil sodelovanje pri opredelitvi in izvedbi zakonodajnih in operativnih programov (Pogodba o Ustavi III-258) ter zagotovil, da bo zakonodajne predloge spremljala ocena njihovega vpliva na temeljne pravice?
to involve the European Parliament and the national parliaments in drawing up and implementing legislative and operational programmes (CT III-258), and to ensure that legislative proposals are accompanied by a fundamental rights impact evaluation?
se bo v prihodnje z EP posvetoval o mednarodnih sporazumih, akcijskih programih in skupnih stališčih ter upošteval postopek soodločanja tako, da bo ministrom posredoval predloge sprememb EP in odpravil možnost postavljanja prekratkih časovnih rokov za pregled zakonodajnih predlogov?
to consult the EP henceforth on international agreements, action programmes and common positions and to base itself on the codecision procedure by submitting the European Parliament’s amendments to Ministers and abolishing all recourse to strict time limits for the consideration of legislative proposals?
bo omogočil dostop do besedil, vloženih v razpravo ali zakonodajno glasovanje na vsakem od zasedanj; bo z Uredbo (ES) 1049/01 ponovno opredelil izjeme v okviru določil o preglednosti zaradi javnega reda in uredil določila o parlamentarnemu nadzoru nad zaupnimi podatki, predvsem podatki, povezanimi z delom organov SITCEN, COSI in EUROPOL?
to make accessible the texts submitted for debate or legislative vote at each of its meetings, to redefine with the European Parliament, in Regulation (EC) 1049/01 , the exceptions to transparency for reasons of public order, and to regulate the arrangements for parliamentary oversight of confidential information, including that linked to the work of SITCEN, COSI and EUROPOL?
bo na področju predhodne razlage, ukinil omejitve pristojnosti Sodišča, izhajajoče iz člena 68 PES in hkrati k ukrepanju pozval 12 držav članic, ki še niso priznale pristojnosti Sodišča v okviru tretjega stebra?
with regard to preliminary rulings, to abolish the limitations on the powers of the Court provided for by Article 68 TEC and to call on the 12 Member States that have not already done so to attribute this power to the Court under the third pillar?
bo pripravil vse potrebno zato, da Evropska komisija ponovno prevzame nalogo, ki jo opravlja koordinator za boj proti terorizmu, in stori vse potrebno za rešitev težav, povezanih z izvedbo akcijskega načrta proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu?
to prepare for the restoration to the European Commission of the tasks temporarily allocated to the Coordinator of the Fight against Terrorism, and to take steps to resolve the problems connected with the implementation of the action plan against terrorism and organised crime?
bo v zakonodajne ukrepe pretvoril "skupne vrednote in poklicna merila policije" (dok.
to convert into legislative measures the ‘shared values and professional standards of the police’ (doc.
11977) in EUROPOL vključi v EU, kot velja za EUROJUST?
11977) and to incorporate EUROPOL in the EU as has already been done in the case of EUROJUST?
bo izboljšal kakovost sodstva in poskrbel za krepitev vzajemnega zaupanja med državami članicami?
to improve the quality of justice and promote mutual confidence between Member States?
glede na to, da namerava Evropska komisija vložiti predlog o "hrambi podatkov" in konec leta 2005 predlog o "načelu razpoložljivosti", kako namerava Svet obravnavati predlog držav članic o teh dveh vprašanjih?
given that the European Commission plans to table a proposal on ‘data retention’ and, in late 2005, a proposal on ‘the principle of availability’, what are the Council’s intentions as regards Member States’ proposals on the same subject?
UL L 145, 31.5.2001, str.
OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0050/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0050/05
Zadeva: Dosežen napredek v letu 2004 pri vzpostavljanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice (OSVP) (člen 2 PES in člen 39 PEU)
Subject: Progress in 2004 on the implementation of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) (Article 2 of the EC Treaty and Article 39 of the Treaty on European Union)
ali je kot dopolnitev letne politične ocene v okviru parlamentarnih razprav, kot jo predvideva člen 39 PEU, pripravljena vzpostaviti poseben, preko svetovnega spleta dostopen sistem stalnega spremljanja evropskega postopka sprejemanja odločitev in njegovega prenosa na nacionalno raven?
Is the Commission prepared to put in place, in addition to the annual political assessment in the framework of the parliamentary debate provided for in Article 39 TEU, a permanent monitoring system, accessible on the Internet, of the European decision-making process and transposition at national level?
katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti za oceno vpliva novih zakonodajnih pobud, še zlasti kar zadeva spoštovanje temeljnih pravic?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to evaluate the impact of new legislative initiatives, inter alia as regards respect for fundamental rights?
katere ukrepe namerava predlagati za izboljšanje evropskih postopkov in postopkov, potrebnih za izvajanje sklepov Varnostnega sveta, če upoštevamo obstoječe sezname terorističnih organizacij?
Given the drawing-up of lists of terrorist organisations, what measures does it intend to put forward to improve European procedures and those for the application of Security Council decisions?
kar zadeva prenosa, ali namerava vzpostaviti informacijski sistem za nacionalne parlamente, na osnovi katerega bodo slednji pravočasno obveščeni o rokih za prenos zakonodajnih ukrepov Unije?
With regard to transposition, is it going to put in place a system of information for national parliaments to ensure that they are notified before the deadline for transposition of European Union legislative measures?
glede na omejene vire in večkrat izražene zahteve Parlamenta, ali namerava omogočiti dostop do raziskovalnih projektov in drugih pobud, ki so financirane iz denarja evropskih davkoplačevalcev?
Given the limits on resources and the repeated calls from Parliament, is it going to give access to research projects and other initiatives funded from European tax-payers’ money?
glede na zelo raznolike razmere v državah članicah, kako namerava vzpostaviti skupno delovno območje in okrepiti omrežja za nacionalne organe od vrhovnih sodišč do nosilcev dejavnosti na območju varnosti in pravice?
Given the diversity of the situations existing in the Member States, how does it intend to create a common work area and reinforce the networks for national authorities, from the level of the Supreme Courts to that of operators in the area of security and justice?
katere ukrepe namerava v soglasju z lokalnimi, regionalnimi in nacionalnimi oblastmi sprejeti za obveščanje evropskih državljanov o njihovih pravicah in večje vključevanje manjšin?
What measures does it intend to take to inform European citizens, in cooperation with the local, regional and national authorities, of their rights and to promote integration of minorities?
glede vloge, ki jo bo od novembra 2006 dalje imela na osnovi Pogodbe o Ustavi, kako se namerava odzvati na naloge Sveta, vzajemno ocenjevanje med državami članicami pri izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma, boj proti terorizmu in pravosodno in policijsko sodelovanje?
Given the role that the Constitutional Treaty will give it as of November 2006, how does it intend to address the functions of the Council, mutual evaluation between Member States in implementation of Schengen, the fight against terrorism and judicial and police cooperation?
kako daleč je priprava posebne skupne strukture za preprečevanje in posredovanje v primeru naravnih nesreč, nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek, izbruha epidemij in terorističnih napadov?
What can the Commission say about the establishment at the Commission of a coordinated, integrated structure to prevent, or intervene in the event of, natural disasters, man-made disasters, epidemics and terrorist attacks?
katere pobude namerava sprejeti za okrepitev zunanjega delovanje EU v OSVP?
What initiatives does it intend to take to reinforce the EU’s external action in the AFSJ?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0051/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0051/05
Zadeva: Davčni in okoljski damping
Subject: Fiscal and environmental dumping
Se Komisija zaveda, da ameriška zvezna država Kansas poleg drugih potencialno nezakonitih subvencij za spodbujanje selitve delovnih mest in proizvodnje iz donosnega britanskega obrata Cellophane v Bridgewaterju ponuja petletno neizvajanje okoljskih predpisov, kar je s stališča STO zelo verjetno nezakonito?
Is the Commission aware that a potentially WTO-illegal five-year holiday from environmental regulations is being offered by the State of Kansas amongst other potentially illegal subsidies to encourage relocation of jobs and production from UK Cellophane's profitable Bridgwater, UK plant?
Se Komisija strinja, da davčni in okoljski damping zaradi postopnega odpravljanja tarifnih ovir postajata vedno pomembnejši trgovinski vprašanji?
Does the Commission agree that fiscal and environmental dumping are likely to become increasingly important trade issues, as tariff barriers are progressively reduced?
Kako bo Komisija preprečila, da se ravnanje zvezne države Kansas, zaradi katerega naj bi bila EU prikrajšana za 300 delovnih mest, ne bi razširilo do te mere, da bi subvencije in okoljski damping oslabili multilateralni trgovinski sistem?
What action will the Commission take prevent practices such as those adopted by the State of Kansas, which is likely to rob the EU of 300 jobs in this instance, from proliferating to a point where subsidies and environmental dumping weaken the open multilateral trade system?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da nacionalne in regionalne oblasti v Evropski uniji ne bodo ponujale podobnih oprostitev davka?
What does the Commission do to prevent similar practices of tax holidays being offered by national or regional authorities in the European Union?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje izvajanje Primarolovega kodeksa ravnanja glede škodljive davčne konkurence?
In this respect what is the Commission's assessment on the implementation of the 'Primarolo' code of conduct dealing with harmful fiscal competition?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0052/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0052/05
, v imenu Odbora za pravne zadeve
, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs
Zadeva: Uredba o patentu Skupnosti in s tem povezano zakonodajo
Subject: Regulation on the Community Patent and related legislation
Ker bo oblikovanje patenta Skupnosti omogočila prilagajanje njenih proizvodnih in distribucijskih dejavnosti evropski razsežnosti, za katero se meni, da je bistveno orodje za uspeh EU pri spreminjanju rezultatov raziskav v industrijske in poslovne uspehe.
Given that the creation of a Community patent would enable undertakings to adapt their production and distribution activities to the European dimension, which is considered to be an essential tool, if the EU is to succeed in turning research results into industrial and commercial success,
Ker Odbor za pravne zadeve meni, da je primerna zaščita izvirnih idej potrebna, če se Unija želi približati lizbonskim ciljem ter da je na tem področju izrednega pomena osnutek uredbe o patentu Skupnosti in s tem povezano zakonodajo, zlasti sklep Sveta o ustanovitvi Sodišča patenta Skupnosti.
Given that the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that adequate protection of inventive ideas is necessary if the Union wishes to attain the Lisbon objectives, and that, in this field, the Draft Regulation on the Community Patent, together with all its subsequent legislation, especially the Council decision establishing a Court on the Community patent, is of paramount importance,
Ker so osnutek uredbe o patentu Skupnosti ter s tem povezani zakonodajni akti že dve leti zaustavljeni na Svetu.
Given that the draft regulation of the Community patent, as well as certain related legislative acts, have been blocked in the Council for more than two years,
Ali bi lahko Svet v celoti in odkrito obvestila Parlament o glavnih ovirah in težavah pri doseganju sporazuma o patentu Skupnosti, zlasti tistih, ki se nanašajo na jezikovni režim patenta Skupnosti?
Could the Council fully and openly inform Parliament about the main obstacles and problems which are preventing an agreement being reached on the Community Patent, especially those concerning the language regime of the Community patent?
Ali bi lahko Svet obvestila Parlament o tem, kako namerava ponovno obravnavati sprejem tega tako pomembnega dela zakonodaje in kateri so naslednji koraki za doseganje le-tega?
Could the Council inform Parliament about the measures that it intends to take so as to facilitate the adoption of this important piece of legislation?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0053/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0053/05
Ker bo oblikovanje patenta Skupnosti omogočila prilagajanje njenih proizvodnih in distribucijskih dejavnosti evropski razsežnosti, za katero se meni, da je bistveno orodje za uspeh EU pri spreminjanju rezultatov raziskav v industrijske in poslovne uspehe.
Given that the creation of a Community patent would enable undertakings to adapt their production and distribution activities to the European dimension, which is considered to be an essential tool if the EU is to succeed in turning research results into industrial and commercial success,
Ker Odbor za pravne zadeve meni, da je primerna zaščita izvirnih idej potrebna, če se Unija želi približati lizbonskim ciljem ter, da je na tem področju izrednega pomena osnutek uredbe o patentu Skupnosti in s tem povezano zakonodajo, zlasti sklep Sveta o ustanovitvi Sodišča patenta Skupnosti.
Given that the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that adequate protection of inventive ideas is necessary if the Union wishes to attain the Lisbon objectives and that, in this field, the Draft Regulation on the Community Patent, together with all its subsequent legislation, especially the Council decision establishing a Court on the Community patent, is of paramount importance,
Ker so osnutek uredbe o patentu Skupnosti ter s tem povezani zakonodajni akti že dve leti zaustavljeni na Svetu.
Given that the draft regulation on the Community patent, as well as certain related legislative acts, have been blocked in the Council for more than two years,
Ali bi lahko Komisija v celoti in odkrito obvestila Parlament o glavnih ovirah in težavah pri doseganju sporazuma o patentu Skupnosti, zlasti tistih, ki se nanašajo na jezikovni režim patenta Skupnosti?
Could the Commission fully and openly inform Parliament about the main obstacles and problems which are preventing an agreement being reached on the Community Patent, especially those concerning the language regime of the Community patent?
Ali bi lahko Komisija obvestila Parlament o tem, kako namerava ponovno obravnavati sprejem tega tako pomembnega dela zakonodaje in kateri so naslednji koraki za doseganje le-tega?
Could the Commission inform Parliament about the measures that it intends to take so as to facilitate the adoption of this important piece of legislation?
Ali bi lahko Komisija v celoti obvestila Parlament o stanju in vsebini predloga, za katerega je bilo rečeno, da se navezuje na upravljanje avtorskih agencij ter ali Komisija meni, da lahko pomaga pri ponovni obravnavi zakonodaje na tem področju?
Could the Commission fully inform Parliament about the situation and substance of the proposal concerning the management of collecting societies and whether it considers that it can help to facilitate the adoption of legislation in this area?