natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0110/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0110/09
Zadeva: Uporaba manjšinskih jezikov kot del skupne evropske kulturne dediščine
Subject: Language use by minorities as part of the common European cultural heritage
Regionalni in manjšinski jeziki so eden naših glavnih kulturnih zakladov in del skupne evropske kulturne dediščine.
Regional and national minority languages are a major cultural treasure and common European cultural heritage.
Podporo njihovemu ohranjanju bi morali nenehno zboljševati na vseh ravneh.
Support to foster them should be improved constantly and at every level.
Z zakonodajo bi hkrati s spodbujanjem državnega jezika morali upoštevati in zagotoviti tudi varstvo in spodbujanje jezikov narodnih manjšin.
Legislation needs to take account of and ensure protection and promotion of the national minority languages while promoting the state language.
Slovaški parlament je 30. junija 2009 sprejel spremembe zakona o državnem jeziku Slovaške republike (zakon št. 270/1995), ki so pričele veljati 1. septembra 2009.
The Slovak Parliament on 30 June 2009 approved amendments to the Law on the State Language of the SR (Act No 270/1995) which came into force on 1 September 2009.
Tako spremenjeni zakon omejuje uporabo vseh jezikov razen slovaščine in predvideva kazen do 5000 EUR, če kdo npr. uporabi materni jezik manjšine ali neustrezno uporablja državni jezik
The amended law restricts the use of languages other than Slovak and introduces fines of up to 5 000 euros for using e.g. the mother tongue of minorities or using the state language incorrectly.
S širitvijo obsega uporabe državnega jezika v javnem sporazumevanju, na primer pri telekomunikacijah, prometnih storitvah, tudi pri sporazumevanju v zdravstvu, ta zakon posega v uresničevanje temeljnih načel svobode izražanja in pravice do nediskriminacije pri dostopu do blaga in storitev.
The law interferes with the implementation of the basic principles of freedom of expression and interferes with the right not to be discriminated against in access to goods and services by widening the scope of using the state language to public communication, e.g. in telecommunication, transport services, even in communication in health services.
Določbe o obvezni uporabi besedil v slovaškem jeziku, ki bi jih moralo sprejeti ministrstvo za kulturo Slovaške Republike o spomenikih, spominskih ploščah in krajih, veljajo tudi za nazaj in brez časovnih omejitev.
A provision making the use of Slovak texts that have to be approved by the Ministry of Culture of the SR obligatory on monuments, memorial plaques and memorials is retroactive and without time limit.
Določbe zakona, ki razlikujejo med uporabo češčine in drugih manjšinskih jezikov, bi lahko privedle do neenakega obravnavanja manjšinskih jezikov, s tem pa bi kršile evropska načela nediskriminacije, spoštovanja jezikovne raznolikosti in spodbujanja manjšinskih jezikov.
The provisions of the Law which distinguish between using the Czech language and the other minority languages could lead to discrimination between minority languages, thus contravening European principles of non-discrimination, respect for linguistic diversity and promotion of minority languages.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da takšna zakonodaja ni v skladu s človekovimi pravicami in temeljnimi svoboščinami, kakor so zapisane v mednarodnih in evropskih konvencijah, in da je tudi v neskladju z zakonodajo EU in politiko nediskriminacije?
Does the Commission not think that such legislation is incompatible with human rights and fundamental freedoms as enshrined in international and European conventions, and that it is incompatible with EU law and policies on anti-discrimination?
Kaj bo Komisija storila, da bi zaščitila načelo prepovedi diskriminacije, kakor ga določa Direktiva 2000/437/ES ?
How will the Commission act to safeguard the principle of prohibiting discrimination, as laid down in Directive 2000/43/EC ?
Ali se komisija strinja, da je jezikovna raznolikost zaželena v vsaki pluralistični družbi, in to ne samo s kulturnega ampak tudi z gospodarskega vidika, saj je nujna za prosti pretok delavcev?
Does the Commission agree that linguistic diversity is desirable for any pluralistic society, not only from a cultural but also from an economic point of view as a precondition for the free movement of workers?
Kaj namerava Evropska komisija storiti, da se člani narodnih manjšin ne bi čutili diskriminirane proti uporabi maternega jezika v lastni državi, članici Evropske unije?
What does the European Commission intend to do to ensure that members of national minorities do not feel discriminated against using their mother tongue in their own country within the European Union?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0111/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0111/09
Zadeva: Zagotovitev podpore Evropske unije za mednarodno pogodbo za uresničitev sveta brez jedrskega orožja v desetih letih
Subject: Securing European Union support for an international treaty to create a nuclear weapons-free world within 10 years
Na področju jedrskega orožja je prišlo nedavno do pomembnih dogodkov.
There have recently been significant developments related to the question of nuclear weapons.
Varnostni svet Združenih narodov je 24. septembra 2009 soglasno glasoval za resolucijo o razoroževanju in neširjenju orožja, ki obravnava vprašanje popolne odprave jedrskega orožja.
On 24 September 2009, the United Nations Security Council voted unanimously in favour of a resolution on disarmament and non-proliferation addressing the issue of the total abolition of nuclear weapons.
Poleg tega naj bi Združene države Amerike in Rusija decembra 2009 podpisale pogodbo za zmanjšanje količine uporabljenega strateškega orožja, Združene države pa so zajamčile še dodatno zmanjšanje svojih zalog jedrskega orožja.
In addition, in December 2009, the US and Russia are due to sign a treaty which will reduce the number of strategic weapons deployed, and the US has pledged even further cuts to its nuclear arsenal.
V teh kritičnih razmerah mora EU pospešiti svoje ukrepanje za odpravo tovrstnega orožja.
At this critical juncture, the EU should accelerate its action towards the elimination of nuclear weapons.
Prav tako si mora prizadevati za tesnejše sodelovanje s svojimi partnerji, zlasti z Združenimi državami in Rusijo.
With the same objective, the EU should pursue closer cooperation with its partners, in particular the US and Russia.
EU mora tudi izkoristiti priložnost, ki jo ponuja konferenca Združenih narodov leta 2010 za revizijo Pogodbe o neširjenju jedrskega orožja, in pozvati k pripravi mednarodne pogodbe za odpravo jedrskega orožja.
The EU should also seize the opportunity represented by the 2010 UN NPT review conference to call for the establishment of an international treaty abolishing nuclear weapons.
S to pogodbo bi bilo treba prepovedati razvoj, preskušanje, proizvodnjo in skladiščenje tovrstnega orožja ter države, ki imajo to orožje, obvezati k razorožitvi.
Such a treaty must prohibit development, testing, production and stockpiling of nuclear weapons and oblige states that possess nuclear armaments to disarm.
Prepovedati bi bilo treba tudi proizvodnjo cepljivega materiala in zahtevati uničenje dostavnih vozil.
This treaty must also prohibit the production of fissile material and require the destruction of delivery vehicles.
Države z jedrskim orožjem, ki ne spada v ureditev po Pogodbi o neširjenju jedrskega orožja, pa na podlagi nove pogodbe ne bi imele več izgovora, da bi ga še naprej posedovale.
The same treaty will remove any justification advanced by countries which possess nuclear weapons outside the NPT regime for keeping them.
Jedrsko orožje naj bi dobilo enak status kot kemično in biološko orožje, namreč popolno prepoved.
Nuclear armaments should assume the same status - a complete ban - as chemical and biological weapons.
Evropska unija pa mora poleg tega dejavno podpreti svetovna prizadevanja za uvedbo desetletnega časovnega okvira za uresničitev pobude za svet brez jedrskega orožja.
Furthermore, the European Union should actively support global efforts to establish a 10-year timeframe for achieving a nuclear weapons-free world.
Katere nedavne ukrepe je sprejel Svet za uresničitev sveta brez jedrskega orožja v skladu z zavezami iz strategije EU proti širjenju orožja za množično uničevanje (Evropski svet, 12. december 2003)?
In line with the commitments enshrined in the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of WMD (European Council, 12 December 2003), what recent steps has the Council taken in order to achieve a nuclear weapons-free world?
Ali se Svet strinja, da bi si morala Evropska unija prizadevati za uvedbo časovnega razporeda desetih let za izpolnitev tega cilja?
Does the Council agree that the European Union should try to establish a timeframe of 10 years to achieve this goal?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0112/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0112/09
Zadeva: Skupno načrtovanje raziskav za boj proti nevrodegenerativnim boleznim, zlasti Alzheimerjevi bolezni
Subject: Joint programming of research to combat neurodegenerative diseases, in particular Alzheimer's
Komisija je 22. julija 2009 sprejela priporočilo Sveta o ukrepih za boj proti nevrodegenerativnim boleznim, zlasti Alzheimerjevi bolezni, s skupnim načrtovanjem raziskovalnih dejavnosti (KOM(2009)0379).
On 22 July 2009, the Commission adopted a Council Recommendation on measures to combat neurodegenerative diseases, in particular Alzheimer's, through joint programming of research activities (COM(2009)0379).
Ker je predlagana pravna podlaga člen 165 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, je bil dokument poslan v posvetovanje Evropskemu parlamentu.
Since the proposed legal basis was Article 165 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the document was sent for consultation to the European Parliament.
Ali lahko Svet potrdi, da namerava Svet za konkurenčnost sprejeti sklep o tem vprašanju na svojem zasedanju 3. decembra 2009?
Can the Council confirm its intention to adopt its conclusions on this subject in the Competitiveness Council of 3 December 2009?
Kakšni so razlogi za takšno izbiro postopka?
What are the reasons for the chosen procedure?
Ali je Svet glede na to, da se je posvetoval s Parlamentom o predlogu Komisije, pripravljen upoštevati mnenje Parlamenta pri pripravi sklepa Sveta?
Since Parliament was consulted on the Commission's proposal, is the Council prepared to take Parliament's views into account in drafting the Council's conclusions?
Ali lahko Svet v zvezi z morebitnimi prihodnjimi pobudami o skupnem načrtovanju raziskav potrdi svoje mnenje, da bi morale načeloma biti vse takšne pobude sprejete z uporabo iste pravne podlage, torej pod naslovom Raziskave?
Regarding possible future joint programming of research initiatives, can the Council confirm its opinion that these initiatives should in principle all be adopted using the same legal basis, falling under the research heading?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0113/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0113/09
Zadeva: Uvoz mesa iz Brazilije in drugih držav izven Skupnosti
Subject: Meat imports from Brazil and other non-Community countries
Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo je med 20. januarjem in 2. februarjem 2009 v Braziliji opravil inšpekcijske preglede, da bi preveril, ali brazilski izvoz ustreza standardom Skupnosti.
The Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) carried out inspections in Brazil between 20 January and 2 February 2009 to check that Brazilian exports comply with Community standards.
Iz poročila, ki ga je urad objavil kasneje, je razvidno, da nekateri certifikacijski organi ne izpolnjujejo zahtevanih standardov.
From the report published subsequently by the FVO, it would seem that some certification bodies do not meet the standards required.
Ali lahko Komisija glede na nepravilnosti, ki jih je ugotovil Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo, zagotovi, da 1500 brazilskih obratov z dovoljenjem za izvoz v Evropsko unijo izpolnjuje zahteve Skupnosti?
In view of the irregularities found by the FVO, can the Commission guarantee that the 1 500 Brazilian holdings authorised to export to the EU meet the Community’s requirements?
Poročilo Urada za prehrano in veterinarstvo razkriva tudi resne pomanjkljivosti v sistemu sledljivosti, ki ga uporabljajo brazilski obrati, zlasti pri identifikaciji živali in bazah podatkov.
The FVO’s report also revealed serious deficiencies in the traceability system run by the Brazilian holdings, especially with regard to animal identification and databases.
Kako je glede na ugotovitve inšpekcijskega pregleda evropskim potrošnikom mogoče zagotoviti, da vse meso iz Brazilije ustreza zahtevam EU o varnosti hrane?
In light of the inspection results, what guarantees can European consumers be given that all meat from Brazil meets the EU’s food safety requirements?
Urad za prehrano in veterinarstvo je tudi ugotovil, da veliko pošiljk v tranzitu prek Evropske unije nima uradnih potrdil.
The FVO also found that a large number of consignments in transit through the EU did not have official certificates.
Poleg tega meso v teh pošiljkah ni bilo dovolj zorjeno, petdeset odstotkov teh živali pa je prišlo z območja, ki ga Evropska unija ni odobrila.
Furthermore, the meat in these consignments had not undergone sufficient maturation, and 50% of the animals concerned came from an area that was not approved by the EU.
Ali se na mejnih kontrolnih točkah dejansko preverjajo proizvodi iz držav izven Skupnosti ali le spremni dokumenti?
Do the border inspection posts actually check products from non-Community countries or do they only check the accompanying documents?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0114/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0114/09
Če se bo direktiva o storitvah na notranjem trgu (št. 2006/123/ES ) izvajala ustrezno, bodo lahko podjetja izkoristila prednosti enotnega trga, potrošniki bodo zaščiteni in uvedeni bodo socialni zaščitni ukrepi.
With a properly implemented Directive on Services in the Internal Market (Directive 2006/123/EC ), businesses will be able to exploit the advantages of the single market, consumers will be protected and social safeguards put in place.
Poenostavljeno bo delovanje nacionalnih uprav, postopki bodo hitrejši in prijaznejši državljanom, konkurenca na enotnem trgu pa bo dobila nove spodbude.
It will streamline national administrations, establish easier, quicker and citizen-friendly procedures, and drive competition in the single market.
Najpomembnejša vidika direktive o storitvah sta določba o tem, da morajo države članice pregledati svojo nacionalno zakonodajo, kar med drugim vključuje postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja, in določba o odprtju točk „vse na enem mestu“ v vseh državah članicah.
Two of the most important aspects of the Services Directive are the provision for Member States to screen their national legislation, including the mutual evaluation process, and the provision to establish single points of contact in all Member States.
Ali lahko Komisija posreduje informacije o naslednjem:
Can the Commission provide the following information?
Ali so države članice že dokončale pregled zakonodaje in v kolikšni meri je to prispevalo k uspešnemu prenosu direktive o storitvah?
Have Member States completed the legislative screening process, and how far has this contributed to the effective transposition of the Services Directive?
Koliko držav članic bo vzpostavilo delujoče točke „vse na enem mestu“ do izteka roka za prenos direktive in ali bodo te točke omogočale učinkovito izvedbo postopkov za ustanovitev podjetij, vključno z informacijami o socialnih in delavskih pravicah in zahtevah?
How many Member States will have an operational point of single contact by the transposition deadline, and will these contact points offer efficient access to business establishment procedures, including information about social and workers' rights and requirements?
Ali lahko Komisija glede na zgornje odgovore pojasni še naslednje:
In light of the above answers, can the Commission give its assessment of:
Ali bodo vse države članice ujele rok za prenos direktive 28. decembra 2009?
whether all Member States will meet the transposition deadline of 28 December 2009;
Kateri so bili največji izzivi za države članice pri prenosu direktive, zlasti kar zadeva socialne storitve?
what have been the biggest challenges faced by Member States in the transposition of the Directive, in particular concerning the social services;
Kako so bile udeležene interesne skupine?
in what way were the interested stakeholders involved?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0115/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0115/09
Zadeva: Stanje v zvezi z območjem proste trgovine Euromed 2010
Subject: The state of play of the Euromed 2010 Free Trade Area (FTA)
Eden od projektov, ki izvirajo iz barcelonskega procesa, je vzpostavitev območja proste trgovine v Sredozemlju do leta 2010.
One of the projects emanating from the Barcelona Process is the establishment of an FTA in the Mediterranean by 2010.
Območje proste trgovine naj bi temeljilo na regionalnem pristopu in vključevalo mrežo sever–jug ter mrežo jug–jug tega območja.
This FTA is meant to be based on a regional approach and is supposed to include a North-South network and a South-South network of FTAs.
Ali Svet meni, da je bila vzpostavitev območja proste trgovine Euromed do leta 2010 uresničljiv cilj?
Does the Council consider that the establishment of a Euromed FTA by 2010 was a realistic objective?
Ali Svet lahko utemelji svoj odgovor?
Can the Council substantiate its answer with reasons?
Parlament se zaveda, da bo kmalu sprejet nov načrt Euromed in da obstajajo možnosti za nov mehanizem za spodbujanje trgovine in naložb v regiji.
The Parliament is aware of a new Euromed Roadmap to be adopted soon and of a possible new mechanism for facilitating trade and investment in the region.
Lahko Svet natančneje pojasni dejanske praktične vidike in učinke takšnega mehanizma?
Can the Council provide more details as to the actual practical aspects and implications of such a mechanism?
Ali Svet lahko pojasni stanje v zvezi z agadirskim sporazumom in prizadevanji EU za njegovo posodobitev ter bolj na splošno razsežnost jug–jug barcelonskega procesa, unijo za Sredozemlje?
Can the Council comment on the state of play of the Agadir Agreement and about the input that the EU is giving to revamp this agreement, and more generally the South-South dimension of the Barcelona Process, the Union for the Mediterranean?
Lahko Svet pojasni, kako je vključil priporočila iz presoje vplivov na trajnost, ki je bila pripravljena na Univerzi v Manchestru, da bi v pogajanjih upoštevali socialno kohezijo in trajnostni razvoj, kot je bilo priporočeno v tej študiji?
Can the Council indicate how it incorporated the recommendations of the sustainability impact assessment drawn up by the University of Manchester to take into account in the negotiations the social cohesion and sustainable development advocated by this study?
Ali Svet lahko pojasni Parlamentu, kaj so vključevala ponovna pogajanja o pridružitvenem sporazumu s Sirijo po njegovi zamrznitvi leta 2004?
Can the Council explain to the Parliament what the renegotiation of the Syria Association Agreement, after it was frozen in 2004, involved?
Ali Svet lahko pojasni stanje glede pogajanj z Libijo in njihov cilj?
Can the Council comment on the negotiations with Libya and their objectives?
Številne sredozemske države so izrazile interes za poglobitev in/ali razširitev svojih trgovinskih sporazumov z EU.
Several Mediterranean Countries have expressed interest in deepening and/or widening their trade agreements with the EU.
Ali Svet lahko:
Can the Council:
obvesti Parlament o tej "novi generaciji" pridružitvenih sporazumov,
inform the Parliament about this 'new generation' of Association Agreements,
sporoči Parlamentu, ali bi Svet lahko ob upoštevanju novih pristojnosti v zvezi s trgovino, ki jih Evropskemu parlamentu podeljuje Lizbonska pogodba, upošteval predhodno resolucijo EP pri pogajanjih o teh novih sporazumih?
tell the Parliament whether, in view of the new powers conferred to the EP in the trade domain by the Treaty of Lisbon, the Council would be in a position to take into account a prior resolution by the EP while negotiating these new agreements?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0116/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0116/09
Ali Komisija meni, da je bila vzpostavitev območja proste trgovine Euromed do leta 2010 uresničljiv cilj?
Does the Commission consider that the establishment of a Euromed FTA by 2010 was a realistic objective?
Ali Komisija lahko utemelji svoj odgovor?
Can the Commission substantiate its answer with reasons?
Lahko Komisija natančneje pojasni dejanske praktične vidike in učinke takšnega mehanizma?
Can the Commission provide more details as to the actual practical aspects and implications of such a mechanism?
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni stanje v zvezi z agadirskim sporazumom in prizadevanjem EU za njegovo posodobitev ter bolj splošno razsežnost jug–jug barcelonskega procesa, unijo za Sredozemlje?
Can the Commission comment on the state of play of the Agadir Agreement and about the input that the EU is giving to revamp this agreement, and more generally the South-South dimension of the Barcelona Process, the Union for the Mediterranean?
Lahko Komisija pojasni, kako je vključila priporočila iz presoje vplivov na trajnost, ki je bila pripravljena na Univerzi v Manchestru, da bi v pogajanjih upoštevali socialno kohezijo in trajnostni razvoj, kot je bilo priporočeno v tej študiji?
Can the Commission indicate how it incorporated the recommendations of the sustainability impact assessment drawn up by the University of Manchester to take into account in the negotiations the social cohesion and sustainable development advocated by this study?
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni Parlamentu, kaj so vključevala ponovna pogajanja o pridružitvenem sporazumu s Sirijo po njegovi zamrznitvi leta 2004?
Can the Commission explain to the Parliament what the renegotiation of the Syria Association Agreement, after it was frozen in 2004, involved?
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni stanje glede pogajanj z Libijo in njihov cilj?
Can the Commission comment on the negotiations with Libya and their objectives?
Ali Komisija lahko:
Can the Commission:
sporoči Parlamentu, ali bi Komisija lahko ob upoštevanju novih pristojnosti v zvezi s trgovino, ki jih Evropskemu parlamentu podeljuje Lizbonska pogodba, upoštevala predhodno resolucijo EP pri pogajanjih o teh novih sporazumih?
tell the Parliament whether, in view of the new powers conferred to the EP in the trade domain by the Treaty of Lisbon, the Commission would be in a position to take into account a prior resolution by the EP while negotiating these new agreements?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0117/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0117/09
Zadeva: Izvajanje resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o vplivu načrtovanega plinovoda v Baltskem morju med Rusijo in Nemčijo na okolje
Subject: Implementation of the EP resolution on the environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea to link up Russia and Germany
Izvaja se komercialni projekt, namenjen izgradnji plinovoda v Baltskem morju (severnoevropski plinovod).
A commercial project aiming at the construction in the Baltic Sea of the North European gas pipeline is being implemented.
Evropski parlament je sprejel resolucijo o vplivu načrtovanega plinovoda na okolje ( P6_TA(2008)0336 ).
Parliament has adopted a resolution on the environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline ( P6_TA(2008)0336 ).
Institucije Evropske unije in države članice so bile pozvane k sprejetju stališč, med drugim o zares neodvisni presoji vplivov projekta na okolje.
The EU institutions and Member States have been called on to take positions regarding, inter alia, a truly independent environmental impact assessment of the project.