natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Člen 152 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije priznava in spodbuja vlogo socialnih partnerjev v EU.
Article 152 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union recognises and promotes the role of the social partners in the EU.
Socialni dialog je pomembnejši kot kdaj koli prej, da bi omilili napetosti, nastale zaradi finančne, gospodarske in socialne krize, oblikovali predloge rešitev, ki jih bodo sprejeli delodajalci in delojemalci, ter zagotovili socialni mir v Evropi.
Social dialogue is more important than ever to ease the tensions created by the financial, economic and social crisis and to propose solutions which will be accepted by both employers and workers and ensure social peace in Europe.
Katere konkretne dejavnosti in ukrepe je izvedel Svet za spodbujanje in krepitev socialnega dialoga in partnerstva na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni?
What specific action and measures has the Council undertaken in order to promote and strengthen social dialogue and partnership at EU and national level?
Kako namerava Svet podpreti vlogo socialnih partnerjev pri sprejemanju odločitev, da bi bila rast v prihodnje vključujoča?
How is the Council planning to foster the role of social partners in the decision-making process in order to create inclusive growth for the future?
Ali bo ukrepal na tak način, da bodo v makroekonomski dialog, ki je v središču novega evropskega upravljanja, vključeni tudi socialni partnerji?
Will it take steps to include the social partners in the macro-economic dialogue at the heart of the new European economic governance?
Ali bo posebej poskrbel za to, da bodo socialni partnerji lahko podali svoje mnenje pri opredelitvi makroekonomskih neravnovesij, oblikovanju letnih pregledov rasti in pripravah programov nacionalnih reform v držav članicah?
Will it in particular ensure that the social partners are consulted on the identification of macro-economic imbalances, the drawing-up of the Annual Growth Survey and the preparation of the Member States’ national reform programmes?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000058/2011
Question for oral answer O-000058/2011
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Izvajanje direktive o kakovosti goriva, vključno s privzeto vrednostjo EU za katranski pesek in naftni skrilavec
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: Implementation of the Fuel Quality Directive, including an EU default value for tar sands and oil shale
Direktiva o kakovosti goriv (Direktiva 2009/30/ES o spremembi Direktive 98/70/ES), katere namen je izpolnitev cilja, da se do leta 2020 za 6 % zmanjšajo emisije od goriv za prevoz, določa 1. januar 2011 kot rok, do katerega morajo izvedbeni ukrepi določiti izhodiščno vrednost za emisije toplogrednih plinov od goriv za prevoz ter izhodiščno vrednost za metodologijo poročanja o letnih postopkih držav članic v skladu s členom 7a.
The Fuel Quality Directive (Directive 2009/30/EC amending Directive 98/70/EC), which aims to fulfil a 6% emission reductions target for transport fuels by 2020, sets a deadline of 1 January 2011 for implementing provisions to set the baseline value for greenhouse gas emissions from transport fuels, and for the methodology on the Member States’ annual reporting procedures under Article 7a.
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni, zakaj ta rok ni bil izpolnjen in zakaj predlagane izvedbene določbe niso bile poslane Parlamentu v pregled tri mesece pred tem rokom?
Will the Commission explain why this deadline has not been met and why Parliament was not sent the proposed implementing provisions for scrutiny three months in advance of this deadline?
Ali zaradi te zamude in pred kratkim zaključenih raziskav Skupnega raziskovalnega središča o privzetih vrednosti EU za katranski pesek in naftni skrilavec, za katere je Komisija sporočila, da so se začele septembra lani, Komisija zdaj lahko vključi privzeto vrednost za katranski pesek in naftni skrilavec v te preložene izvedbene določbe, da bi zagotovila enake pogoje za ta nekonvencionalna goriva v primerjavi z drugimi nekonvencionalnimi gorivi, ki so vključena v te določbe?
In view of this delay and the recently completed research by the JRC into an EU default value for tar sands and oil shale, which the Commission announced had started last September, is the Commission now in a position to include a default value for tar sands and oil shale in these delayed implementing provisions in order to ensure a level playing field for these unconventional fuels with the other unconventional fuels covered by the provisions?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000059/2011
Question for oral answer O-000059/2011
v imenu Odbora za mednarodno trgovino Zadeva: Trenutno stanje na pogajanjih glede sporazuma o prosti trgovini med EU in Indijo
on behalf of the Committee on International Trade Subject: The state of play of the EU-India Free Trade Agreement negotiations
Sporazum o prosti trgovini z Indijo bo najpomembnejši tovrstni sporazum, sklenjen do sedaj.
The Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with India will be the most substantial FTA to be negotiated to date.
Zaradi pomembnosti tega sporazuma sledijo naslednja vprašanja:
In the light of such an important agreement:
Ali je bil dosežen pomemben napredek glede javnih naročil, storitev (vključno z četrto obliko ponudbe), geografskih označb in trajnostnega razvoja, ki bi upravičil realistična pričakovanja, da bo sporazum o prosti trgovini sklenjen kmalu?
What progress has been made on government procurement, services (including mode IV), geographical indications (GIs) and sustainable development to justify that the FTA could be realistically concluded shortly?
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi, da bodo v tem obdobju pogajanja o pravno zavezujočem poglavju o trajnostnem razvoju, ki bo skladno z zahtevami Parlamenta, npr. zadevajoč standarde Mednarodne organizacije dela in izjave OZN, deležna ustrezne pozornosti?
Can the Commission guarantee that negotiations on a legally binding sustainable development chapter consistent with Parliament’s demands, e.g. ILO standards and UN declarations, will be given their due importance within this time frame?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, zakaj meni, da je ekskluzivnost podatkov pomemben del pogajanj glede pravic intelektualne lastnine, kljub resoluciji Parlamenta z dne 12. julija 2007 ( P6_TA(2007)0353 )?
Can the Commission explain why it deems data exclusivity to be an important part of its IPR negotiations, despite Parliament’s resolution of 12 July 2007 ( P6_TA(2007)0353 )?
Kako bi to lahko vplivalo na razvoj Indije na poti k gospodarstvu, temelječemu na znanju?
What consequences could this have on India’s development towards a knowledge based economy?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi lahko sporazum o prosti trgovini med EU in Indijo škodil industriji generičnih zdravil v EU in v Indiji?
Does the Commission consider that the EU-India FTA could threaten the EU’s and India’s generic medicines industry?
Kako bi Komisija zagotovila, da sporazum ne bi omejil dostopa do zdravil, zlasti zdravil brez patenta, proizvedenih v Indiji in EU?
What mechanisms is the Commission considering to ensure that the agreement does not undermine access to medicines, notably off-patent medicines produced in India and the EU?
Kakšne posledice bo imel sporazum o prosti trgovini na farmacevtsko industrijo v EU, ki temelji na raziskavah?
What are the effects of the FTA on the research-based pharmaceutical industry in the EU?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni svoje namere glede vsebine in časovnega okvira pogajanj o naložbah, ter s tistim delom pogajanj, ki govori o pravicah intelektualne lastnine?
Can the Commission clarify its intentions regarding the content and time frame of the investment negotiations, and of their IPR component?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, zakaj ni počakala sprejetja poročila Parlamenta o prihodnji naložbeni politiki, preden je Svetu predložila osnutek mandata za pogajanja o naložbah?
Can the Commission explain why it did not wait until Parliament adopts its report on the future investment policy before proposing a draft mandate on investment negotiations to the Council?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, ali je kultura na kakršen koli način prisotna v pogajanjih, prek poglavja o storitvah ali prek dodatnega protokola o sodelovanju na področju kulture?
Can the Commission indicate whether anything about culture, either through the services chapter or an additional cultural cooperation protocol, is included in the negotiations?
Kakšne učinke bo imel sporazum o prosti trgovini na pomembnejše evropske industrijske panoge, kot so avtomobilska in vinska industrija, industrija žganih pijač, tekstilna in oblačilna industrija?
What are the effects of the FTA on major European industries, such as the car, wine and spirits, and textile/clothing industries?
Ali Komisija v primeru Indije predvideva kakšne izključitve najpomembnejšega blaga in izdelkov?
Does the Commission foresee giving any exclusion to India on key goods and products?
Ali Komisija v primeru avtomobilske industrije razmišlja o odstopanju od načela ničta stopnja za ničto stopnjo pri odpravi tarif ali o pripravi negativnega seznama?
In the case of the car industry, is the Commission considering deviating from the zero-for-zero principle on tariff dismantling or agreeing to a negative list?
Ali lahko Komisija izmeri predvidljive prednosti in slabosti za EU, vključno s posledicami za zaposlovanje?
Can the Commission quantify foreseeable benefits and losses, for the EU, including the effects on employment?
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi, da bo upoštevala zahteve Parlamenta, preden bo sklenila sporazum o prosti trgovini?
Can the Commission guarantee that it will take into account Parliament’s requests before concluding the FTA?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000060/2011
Question for oral answer O-000060/2011
v imenu Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje Zadeva: Sarajevo kot evropska prestolnica kulture v letu 2014
on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education Subject: Sarajevo as a European Capital of Culture in 2014
Med nedavnim obiskom v Sarajevu so bili člani delegacije Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje navdušeni nad razgibanostjo sarajevskega kulturnega dogajanja.
Members of a recent Committee on Culture and Education delegation to Sarajevo were very impressed by the dynamism of the city’s cultural scene.
Izvedeli so, da se namerava mesto potegovati za naslov evropskega mesta kulture v letu 2014 (kot izjema) in je zato začelo z obširnimi pripravami.
They learned that the city intends to submit a bid to be granted the title of European Capital of Culture in 2014 (on an exceptional basis), and has undertaken extensive preparations to that end.
Ker je bilo Sarajevo leta 1914 prizorišče atentata, ki je bil povod za prvo svetovno vojno, bi bil to pomemben korak, da se dokončno pokopljejo duhovi preteklih evropskih delitev in z imenovanjem mesta za novodobno evropsko prestolnico kulture predstavi nova Evropa.
Given that Sarajevo was the site of the assassination that sparked World War I in 1914, this would be an important step in terms of burying the ghosts of past European divisions once and for all and showcasing the new Europe by nominating the city as a new-European-era European Capital of Culture.
Med vojno v Bosni od leta 1992 do leta 1996 je bilo Sarajevo oblegano dlje kot katera koli druga prestolnica v zgodovini sodobnega vojskovanja.
From 1992 to 1996, during the Bosnian War, Sarajevo suffered the longest siege of a capital city in the history of modern warfare.
Vseskozi je ohranilo svoj medkulturni značaj in ga odtlej goji naprej.
It retained its intercultural character throughout, and has fostered it ever since.
Sarajevo želi pustiti preteklost za sabo in se z navdušenjem uzreti v svojo evropsko prihodnost.
Sarajevo wants to leave the past behind and look enthusiastically to its European future.
Zasluži si priložnost, da pokaže svoj izjemni medkulturni potencial.
It deserves a chance to demonstrate its immense potential for interculturalism.
Ali bi lahko Svet, skupaj s Parlamentom, ob ustreznem upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1622/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o vzpostavitvi aktivnosti Skupnosti za dogodek evropske prestolnice kulture za leta 2007 do 2019 , razmislila o tem, da bi naredila za leto 2014 izjemo?
Having due regard to Decision 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019 , could the Council, together with Parliament, consider making an exception for 2014?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000061/2011
Question for oral answer O-000061/2011
v imenu Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje Zadeva: Sarajevo kot evropska prestolnica kulture 2014
on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education Subject: Sarajevo as a European Capital of Culture in 2014
Ali bi lahko Komisija, skupaj s Parlamentom, ob ustreznem upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1622/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o vzpostavitvi aktivnosti Skupnosti za dogodek evropske prestolnice kulture za leta 2007 do 2019 , razmislila o tem, da bi naredila za leto 2014 izjemo?
Having due regard to Decision 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019 , could the Commission, together with Parliament, consider making an exception for 2014?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000063/2011
Question for oral answer O-000063/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Test izjemnih situacij v bančnem sektorju EU za leto 2011
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: 2011 stress test of the EU banking sector
Test izjemnih situacij, opravljen julija 2010, ni uspel povrniti zaupanja v bančni sistem EU zaradi več razlogov:
The stress tests undertaken in July 2010 failed to restore confidence in the EU banking system due to several reasons:
– ker je vsaka država posebej določila, katere banke bodo sodelovale pri testu,
– because each country decided which banks should undergo the stress test;
– ker so bili najbolj neugodni scenariji, uporabljeni za analizo bančnega sistema, v vsaki državi članici drugačni,
– because the most adverse scenarios used to analyse the banking system were different in every Member State;
– ker se je v praksi izkazalo, da so bili podatki v mnogih primerih napačni.
– because the reality demonstrated that in many cases the information was wrong.
Novi test izjemnih situacij se bo odslej izvajal pod vodstvom novoustanovljenega Evropskega bančnega organa, v skladu z zaključki Evropskega sveta iz marca pa ga je treba izvesti v tesnem sodelovanju s Komisijo, evropskim odborom za sistemska tveganja, Evropsko centralno banko in nacionalnimi nadzorniki.
Now, the newly created European Banking Authority is in charge of a new stress test exercise which – as stated in the European Council conclusions of March – must be conducted in close cooperation with the Commission, the ESRB, the ECB and the national supervisors.
Na podlagi kakovosti izvedbe se bo ocenjevala kredibilnost celotnega evropskega finančnega institucionalnega okvira.
The credibility of the whole European financial institutional framework will be judged by the quality of the exercise.
Evropski svet je v svojih zaključkih marca od držav članic zahteval, da pred objavo rezultatov pripravijo posebne in ambiciozne strategije za prestrukturiranje ranljivih institucij.
Member States have been requested – by the March European Council conclusions – to prepare, ahead of the publication of the results, specific and ambitious strategies for the restructuring of vulnerable institutions.
Katere so glavne spremembe, s katerimi bi preprečili, da bi se ponovil lanskoletni neuspeh pri izvajanju testa izjemnih situacij v bančnem sektorju?
What are the main changes to avoid a repeat of last year’s failure of the banking stress test exercise?
Ali je Komisija zadovoljna z dejstvom, da bo test izjemnih situacij v nekaterih državah zajel skoraj 85 % bančnega sektorja, v drugih pa bo komajda presegel 50 %?
Is the Commission happy with the fact that in some countries the stress test will cover almost 85% of the banking sector while in others coverage will hardly exceed 50%?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000064/2011
Question for oral answer O-000064/2011
Zadeva: Breme podhranjenosti v Evropi
Subject: Burden of malnutrition in Europe
Podhranjenost je resen javnozdravstveni problem v Evropi, ki vlade EU vsako leto stane 120 milijard EUR.
Malnutrition is a serious public health problem in Europe which is costing EU governments EUR 120 billion every year.
Vzroki za podhranjenost so različni, med drugim pomanjkljiv dostop do zdrave hrane, izguba apetita, motnje v presnovi ali nezmožnost hranjenja med boleznijo ali operacijo.
Malnutrition is caused by a variety of factors, including lack of access to healthy foods, loss of appetite, metabolic conditions, or an inability to eat due to illness or surgery.
Zaradi podhranjenosti se lahko podaljša okrevanje in bivanje v bolnišnici, to pa vodi v večjo izpostavljenost okužbam ter manjšo stopnjo neodvisnosti in kakovost življenja.
It can delay recovery and prolong hospitalisation, leading to increased susceptibility to infection and reduced independence and quality of life.
Obsežne študije, zbrane v poročilu organizacije proizvajalcev bolnišnične prehrane (Medical Nutrition Industry) iz leta 2009 o reševanju problematike podhranjenosti, kažejo, da vsak četrti hospitalizirani bolnik tvega podhranjenost ali je že podhranjen, prav tako pa je podhranjenost tvega 90 % bolnikov na dolgotrajni negi v skupnosti.
Large-scale studies compiled in the 2009 Medical Nutrition Industry report on ‘Tackling Malnutrition’ show that one in four patients admitted to hospital are at risk of malnutrition or are already malnourished, and up to 90% of residents in long-term care in the community are also at risk of malnutrition.
Evropsko prebivalstvo se hitro stara, zato se bodo socialni in ekonomski stroški podhranjenosti v prihodnjih letih stalno povečevali, če ne bomo sprejeli konkretnih ukrepov za večjo ozaveščenost o tej resni težavi in soočanje z njo.
With Europe’s rapidly ageing population, the social and economic costs of malnutrition will rise steadily over the coming years unless concrete measures are taken to raise awareness and to address this serious problem.
Izboljšanje prehrambenih navad, oblikovanje celovitih prehranskih smernic za zdravstvene delavce in spodbujanje dostopa bolnikov do prehranskih terapij bi bili stroškovno učinkoviti načini lajšanja bremena podhranjenosti.
Improving dietary habits, developing comprehensive nutrition guidelines for healthcare professionals and promoting patients’ access to nutritional therapies would be cost-effective means of addressing the burden of malnutrition.
– Ali se bo Komisija glede na obsežnost problematike in njeno zapostavljenost lotila vseevropske kampanje ozaveščanja o bremenu podhranjenosti v Evropi?
– Given the extent of the problem and its under-acknowledgment, will the Commission engage in a pan-European awareness-raising campaign on the burden of malnutrition in Europe?
– Kaj namerava storiti – v smislu predlaganja priporočil ali zakonodaje –, da bi državam članicam pomagala vključiti dietetiko in prehransko oskrbo v svoje strategije javnega zdravja in boja proti boleznim?
– What is the Commission planning to do – in terms of proposing recommendations or legislation – in order to assist Member States to integrate nutrition and nutritional care in their public health and disease management strategies?
– Ali bo Komisija obravnavala breme podhranjenosti starejših v okviru svojega akcijskega načrta o aktivnem staranju, ki ga bo predlagala v letu 2011?
– Will the Commission address the burden of malnutrition in the elderly as part of its action plan on active ageing to be proposed in 2011?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000065/2011
Question for oral answer O-000065/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Izvrševanje pravil o ladijskem prevozu strupenih odpadkov v države v razvoju
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Enforcement of regulations on the shipping of toxic waste to developing countries
EU vsako leto proizvede okrog sedemdeset milijonov ton nevarnih odpadkov.
The EU produces some seventy million tons of hazardous waste every year.
Zaradi izogibanja strogim standardom EU za ravnanje z odpadki in izkoriščanja nižjih stroškov ravnanja z odpadki, se nevarni in elektronski odpadki včasih izvozijo v odstranjevanje v države v razvoju.
To avoid strict EU waste management standards and to exploit lower treatment costs, hazardous and electronic waste is sometimes exported to developing countries for disposal.
Čeprav je to z uredbo o pošiljkah odpadkov ((ES) št. 1013/2006) prepovedano, podatki, ki so jih države članice posredovale Komisiji, kažejo, da število teh nezakonitih pošiljk narašča.
Though the Waste Shipments Regulation (WSR, (EC) No 1013/2006) prohibits this, data reported to the Commission by the Member States shows a growing number of these illegal shipments.
Pregledi in nadzor se med državami članicami zelo razlikujejo in obstaja sum, da se odpadki nezakonito izvažajo prek pristanišč EU z najmanj učinkovitim nadzorom.
Inspections and controls vary greatly between Member States, and waste is suspected to be illegally exported through the EU ports with the least effective controls.
Poleg tega je poročanje držav članic o posameznih incidentih z nezakonitimi pošiljkami odpadkov nedosledno in pomanjkljivo.
In addition, Member States' reporting on specific incidents of illegal waste shipments is inconsistent and insufficient.
Tako npr. v EU ostaja neizkazanih skoraj 70 % elektronskih odpadkov in le 33 % odpadne električne in elektronske opreme je prijavljene za obdelavo v skladu z zakonodajo EU.
For instance, almost 70% of electronic waste in the EU is unaccounted for and only 33% of waste electrical and electronic equipment is reported to be treated according to EU legislation.
Komisija ocenjuje, da 19 % pošiljk odpadkov krši uredbo o pošiljkah odpadkov.
The Commission has estimated that 19% of waste shipments are in violation of the Waste Shipment Regulation.
V dveh nedavnih študijah za Komisijo je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi bilo treba za reševanje problema uvesti novo zakonodajo.
Two recent studies for the Commission have concluded that new legislation should be put in place to address the problem.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da pravna nejasnost uredbe o pošiljkah odpadkov in odsotnost skupnih zahtev EU glede izvajanja pregledov pošiljk odpadkov ogrožata prizadevanja za izvrševanje uredbe?
Does the Commission agree that a lack of legal clarity in the WSR, as well as a lack of common EU-wide requirements on how to carry out inspections of waste shipments, is undermining efforts to enforce the Regulation?
Katero pravno sredstvo namerava Komisija uporabiti za odpravo pomanjkljivosti uredbe o pošiljkah odpadkov?
What legal action does the Commission envisage to address the shortcomings of the WSR?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je potrebna revizija uredbe o pošiljkah odpadkov, s katero bi ta postala bolj učinkovita, zlasti glede zahtev v zvezi s pregledi iz člena 50 te uredbe?
Does the Commission agree that a revision of the WSR is required in order to make it more effective, particularly with respect to the inspection requirements of Article 50 of the Regulation?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi sprejetje posebnih skupnih smernic EU o okoljskih pregledih pošiljk odpadkov – poleg nove zakonodaje – izvršilnim organom lahko zagotovila trdno ozadje za ustrezno izvajanje in izvrševanje uredbe o pošiljkah odpadkov?
Does the Commission consider that adoption of specific common EU guidelines on environmental inspections of waste shipment, in addition to new legislation, could provide enforcement bodies with solid background for the proper implementation and enforcement of the WSR?