natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Madžarske oblasti so bile izjemno počasne pri prošnji za evropsko pomoč in uporabo evropskega mehanizma civilne zaščite.
The Hungarian authorities have been extremely slow to request European assistance and the mobilisation of the European Civil Protection Mechanism.
Glede na to, da naj bi stroški nesreče dosegli na desetine milijonov EUR ter da bo proces odstranitve strupov zahteval dolgotrajno financiranje in zavezo madžarskih in evropskih organov, katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija za omejitev okoljske katastrofe in zagotovitev pomoči ljudem, ki so utrpeli škodo pri zdravju in lastnini.
In view of the fact that the costs of the disaster are estimated to reach tens of millions and that the process of decontamination will require long-term financing and commitment from both the Hungarian and the EU authorities, what action does the Commission plan to take to limit the environmental disaster and provide help for the people whose heath and belongings have been affected?
Ali je Komisija začela preiskavo o morebitnih kršitvah evropske zakonodaje, zlasti direktive o rudarskih odpadkih (2006/21/ES o ravnanju z odpadki iz dejavnosti pridobivanja mineralnih surovin), direktive Seveso II (96/82/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena) in okvirne direktive o odpadkih (direktiva 2008/98/ES)?
Has the Commission started an investigation into possible violations of European law, in particular regarding the Directive on Mining Waste (2006/21/EC on the management of waste from the extractive industries), the Seveso II Directive (96/82/EC as amended) and the Waste Framework Directive (Directive 2008/98/EC)?
Ali preučuje možnost uporabe sredstev Evropskega solidarnostnega sklada za Madžarsko?
Is the Commission examining the possibility of mobilising the European Solidarity Fund for Hungary?
Ali so za njih zaprosili madžarski organi?
Have the Hungarian authorities requested this?
Ali načrtuje pregled veljavne zakonodaje, da bo zagotovila strožjo uporabo za preprečitev takšnih nesreč v prihodnosti?
Is the Commission planning a review of existing legislation to ensure its stricter application, in order to avoid any such incidents in the future?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0163/2010
Question for oral answer O-0163/2010
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Tunizija - o členu 61a kazenskega zakonika
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Tunisia - on Article 61a of the Penal Code
Tunizijski parlament je 15. junija 2010 sprejel novo spremembo člena 61a kazenskega zakonika, ki obravnava kršenje tunizijske zunanje varnosti.
The Tunisian Chamber of Deputies adopted on 15 June 2010 a new amendment to Article 61a of the Penal Code, which deals with violations of the ‘external security’ of Tunisia.
Sedanji člen 61a kriminalizira stike „z agenti tujih sil z namenom spodkopati vojaške ali diplomatske razmere v Tuniziji“.
Article 61a currently criminalises contacting ‘agents of a foreign power to undermine the military or diplomatic situation in Tunisia’.
Tunizijci so lahko za to kaznivo dejanje obsojeni na največ 20 let zapora z minimalno kaznijo petih let.
Tunisians convicted of this crime face up to 20 years in prison, with a minimum sentence of five years.
Kazenski zakonik je bil spremenjen, da bi kriminaliziral aktiviste na področju človekovih pravic zaradi njihove zagovorniške dejavnosti in da bi se zlasti osredotočil na zagovornike človekovih pravic, ki so se pred kratkim srečali z evropskimi uradniki in poslanci zaradi zaskrbljujočih razmer na področju človekovih pravic v Tuniziji v času, ko se je EU pogajala o krepitvi odnosov s to državo.
The changes to the Penal Code are intended to criminalise human rights activists for their advocacy work and target particularly vocal human rights defenders who recently met with European officials and parliamentarians with regard to Tunisia’s alarming human rights record at the same time as the EU is negotiating an enhancement of its relations with Tunisia.
Poleg tega je tunizijska vlada zamrznila sredstva EU za neodvisne organizacije civilne družbe, natančneje za Tunizijsko ligo za obrambo človekovih pravic (Tunisian League for the Defence of Human Rights) leta 2006 in za Tunizijsko demokratično žensko zvezo (Tunisian Democratic Women’s Association) februarja 2010.
Furthermore, the Tunisian Government has frozen European funding for independent civil society organisations, namely the Tunisian League for the Defence of Human Rights (LTDH) (frozen since 2006) and the Tunisian Democratic Women’s Association (ATFD) (frozen since February 2010).
Ali Komisija meni, da nove zakonodajne določbe nasprotujejo členu 2 pridružitvenega sporazuma med Tunizijo in EU iz leta 1995, ki določa, da mora biti vodilo za domačo in mednarodno politiko obeh strani spoštovanje demokratičnih načel in temeljnih pravic, ter da je sprejetje teh določb ovira za okrepitev odnosov med EU in Tunizijo?
Does the Commission consider that this new legal provision contradicts Article 2 of the 1995 Association Agreement between Tunisia and the EU, which stipulates that respect for democratic principles and fundamental rights must guide the two parties' domestic and international policies, and that its adoption is an obstacle to the enhancement of EU-Tunisia relations?
Katere konkretne ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela, da bi zagotovila učinkovito uporabo evropskih sredstev?
What concrete measures will the Commission take to ensure effective use of European funds?
Kakšna je strategija Komisije v zvezi s Tunizijo na področju človekovih pravic glede na končno izjavo pridružitvenega sveta EU–Tunizija z dne 11. maja 2010?
What is the human rights strategy of the Commission in regard to Tunisia, in line with the final declaration of the EU-Tunisia Association Council of 11 May 2010?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0164/2010
Question for oral answer O-0164/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Možnost uporabe plina iz nadomestnih virov v Evropi
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Possibility of using gas from alternative sources in Europe
Plin, pridobljen iz nadomestnih virov, ima lahko pomembno vlogo na energetskem trgu EU.
The gas produced from alternative sources can play a significant role on the EU energy market.
Z uporabo nekonvencionalnega plina EU dejansko dosega večjo raznolikost energetskih virov, rešuje svojo odvisnost od tretjih držav in se odziva na vse večje povpraševanje po energiji ter nenazadnje v določeni meri – z vidika stroškovne učinkovitosti – napreduje v smeri uresničitve cilja za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov, določenega za leto 2020.
Through the use of unconventional gas, the EU is indeed achieving more diversity of energy sources, tackling its dependence on third countries, reacting to the increase in demand for energy and, lastly, going some way towards meeting in a cost-effective way the greenhouse gas emissions reduction target set for 2020.
Dejavnosti financiranja EU, s katerimi se podpirajo geološke raziskave in rudarske tehnologije, bi omogočile izvedbo začetne ocene virov nadomestnega plina ter možnosti, da bi jih izkoriščali na okolju prijazen in ekonomsko učinkovit način.
The EU funding activities that support both geological research and mining technologies would make it possible to carry out an initial assessment of alternative natural gas resources and the scope for exploiting them in an environmentally-friendly and economically viable way.
Ali je Komisija že ocenila dodano vrednost izkoriščanja plina iz nadomestnih virov v Evropi, tako z vidika proizvodnje energije kot z vidika okoljskega vpliva?
Has the Commission already assessed the added value of exploiting gas from alternative sources in Europe, in terms of both energy production and environmental impact?
Ali namerava Komisija pripraviti študijo tehnične in ekonomske izvedljivosti za tako izkoriščanje, med drugim s poudarkom na finančnih rešitvah, osnovanih na preferencialnih finančnih in kreditnih instrumentih, ki jih zagotavlja Evropska investicijska banka?
Does the Commission intend to prepare a technical and economical feasibility study for such exploitation, inter alia by outlining funding solutions on the basis of preferential financial and credit instruments provided by the European Investment Bank?
Ali Komisija namerava v sklopu proračunskega okvira za obdobje 2014–2020 zagotoviti podporo za geološke raziskave, ki se opravljajo, da bi ocenili morebitne obstoječe vire in možnosti za črpanje plina iz skrilavca v Evropi?
Does the Commission plan, under the budget framework for 2014-2020, to provide support for geological research performed in order to estimate potential existing resources and the scope for mining shale gas in Europe?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0165/2010
Question for oral answer O-0165/2010
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Nesreča s strupenim rdečim blatom na Madžarskem
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Toxic red sludge disaster in Hungary
Ali je Komisiji znana količina svinca v rdečem blatu?
Is the Commission aware of the quantity of lead contained in the red sludge?
Ali lahko Komisija navede, katera zaščitena območja na Madžarskem in v sosednjih državah so ali bodo prizadeta zaradi te nesreče?
Can the Commission indicate the protected areas which have been affected or will eventually be affected by this disaster in Hungary and neighbouring countries?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena podpreti prizadevanja za oceno vpliva težkih kovin, ki so stekle v reko Donavo in njene pritoke, na okolje in zdravje ljudi?
Is the Commission willing to support the efforts to assess the impact on the environment and human health of the heavy metals which have entered the River Danube and its tributaries?
Ali je Komisija glede na težave pri vlaganju zahtevkov za koriščenje solidarnostnega sklada EU, ki zagotavlja finančno pomoč v primeru tovrstnih naravnih nesreč, poenostavila dostop do tega finančnega instrumenta?
Taking into account the difficulties in making applications to the EU Solidarity Fund which provides financial support in the event of natural disasters of this kind, has the Commission simplified access to this financing tool?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena poenostaviti postopke vlaganja zahtevkov in dodeljevanja finančnih sredstev?
Is the Commission willing to simplify application procedures and funding allocation?
Katere praktične ukrepe je sprejela Komisija, da bi zagotovila korektno izvajanje ustreznih določb zakonodaje v državah članicah (npr. v zvezi s pregledi kakovosti na kraju samem)?
What practical measures has the Commission taken to ensure the correct implementation by the Member States of the relevant items of legislation (e.g. concerning in situ quality checks)?
Katere človeške in finančne vire ima GD za okolje na voljo za zagotovitev in okrepitev pravilnega izvajanja te zakonodaje?
What human and financial resources does DG Environment have at its disposal to guarantee and strengthen the proper implementation of this legislation?
Ali Komisija razmišlja o pripravi posebnih strategij za ukrepanje v izrednih razmerah, s katerimi bi preprečili takšne nesreče oziroma se bolje odzvali nanje?
Is the Commission thinking of developing specific emergency response strategies in order to prevent and react to such disasters?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0166/2010
Question for oral answer O-0166/2010
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Tunizija - o členu 61a kazenskega zakonika
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Tunisia - on Article 61a of the Penal Code
Ali Svet meni, da nove zakonodajne določbe nasprotujejo členu 2 pridružitvenega sporazuma med Tunizijo in EU iz leta 1995, ki določa, da mora biti vodilo za domačo in mednarodno politiko obeh strani spoštovanje demokratičnih načel in temeljnih pravic, ter da je sprejetje teh določb ovira za okrepitev odnosov med EU in Tunizijo?
Does the Council consider that this new legal provision contradicts Article 2 of the 1995 Association Agreement between Tunisia and the EU, which stipulates that respect for democratic principles and fundamental rights must guide the two parties' domestic and international policies, and that its adoption is an obstacle to the enhancement of EU-Tunisia relations?
Katere konkretne ukrepe bo Svet sprejel, da bi zagotovil učinkovito uporabo evropskih sredstev?
What concrete measures will the Council take to ensure effective use of European funds?
Kakšna je strategija Sveta v zvezi s Tunizijo na področju človekovih pravic glede na končno izjavo pridružitvenega sveta EU–Tunizija z dne 11. maja 2010?
What is the human rights strategy of the Council in regard to Tunisia, in line with the final declaration of the EU-Tunisia Association Council of 11 May 2010?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0167/2010
Question for oral answer O-0167/2010
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0168/2010
Question for oral answer O-0168/2010
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Posredovanje podatkov držav članic ZDA na podlagi memorandumov o soglasju
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Data transfer to the US by Member States on the basis of Memoranda of Understanding
- Ali lahko Komisija potrdi, da to zadeva posredovanje podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih na evropskih letih in potnikih, ki potujejo na cilje zunaj ZDA?
- Can the Commission confirm that this concerns the transfer of PNR data on European flights and passengers to destinations other than the US?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0169/2010
Question for oral answer O-0169/2010
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Prenos podatkov o finančnih stroških, ki nastanejo pri pregledu prošenj za azil v državah članicah
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Transmission of information on the cost of examining asylum seekers' applications in the Member States
Komisija je Parlamentu in Svetu 8. septembra predložila poročilo o izvajanju direktive 2005/85/ES z dne 1. decembra 2005 o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah.
The Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status was presented on 8 September 2010.
V poročilu je jasno izražena potreba po prenovitvi direktive iz leta 2005.
The report made it clear that the 2005 directive needs to be recast.
Med postopki, ki jih izvajajo države članice, so dejansko velike razlike, zato tudi prihaja do velikih nasprotij na področju kakovosti sprejema prosilcev za azil.
There is a great disparity between Member States’ procedures, leading to widely differing results in terms of the quality of the asylum seekers’ reception.
V poročilu je tudi poudarjeno, da bi „frontloading“ (vztrajno prizadevanje na začetku), namenjen izboljšanju odločitev na prvi stopnji, omogočil, da bi se stroški po določenem času zmanjšali.
Furthermore, the report states that frontloading – improving the quality of first instance decisions – could lead to significant savings.
Z naložbo v postopek na prvi stopnji, kakor je predlagano v prenovitvi, bi bilo mogoče predhodno ugotoviti, katere osebe se lahko potegujejo za mednarodno zaščito in katere se zanjo ne morejo potegovati.
Investing in first instance, as proposed in the recast, would make it possible to identify at an earlier stage asylum seekers who can claim international protection and those who cannot.
Države članice bi tako občutno zmanjšale izdatke za pomoč, ki jo morajo zagotavljati v skladu z določbami veljavne direktive.
Member States would then see a significant fall in the costs of assistance provided under the current directive.
Prav tako bi se lahko osebe, ki uživajo mednarodno zaščito, hitreje vključile v državo gostiteljico in prispevale k njenemu gospodarstvu.
The beneficiaries of international protection could also be integrated more rapidly into the host country and contribute to its economy.
Komisija je na tehnični seji 29. septembra priznala, da nima konkretnih podatkov od držav članic o finančnih stroških (zagotavljanje tolmačenja, pravna pomoč itd.), ki nastanejo pri izvajanju določb direktive iz leta 2005.
The Commission acknowledged during a technical meeting on 29 September 2010 that it did not have firm information from Member States on the financial costs (interpreters, legal aid, etc.) involved in the implementation of the 2005 directive.
Imeti podatke o teh stroških pa je zelo pomembno za izdelavo zanesljive in natančne ocene zneskov, ki bi jih s prenovitvijo dolgoročno privarčevali.
However, information on these costs is crucial for a reliable and accurate assessment of the savings that could be achieved in the long term through the recast.
Ali lahko Svet Komisiji in Parlamentu zagotovi podatke o finančnih stroških, ki nastanejo pri pregledu prošenj za azil v državah članicah?
Can the Council commit itself to providing the Commission and Parliament with information on the financial cost of examining asylum seekers’ applications in the Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0170/2010
Question for oral answer O-0170/2010
Parlamentu in Svetu je bilo 8. septembra predloženo poročilo Komisije o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 2005/85/ES z dne 1. decembra 2005 o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah.
The Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status was presented on 8 September 2010.
V poročilu je tudi poudarjeno, da bi „frontloading“, namenjen izboljšanju odločitev na prvi stopnji, omogočil, da bi se stroški po določenem času zmanjšali.
Furthermore, the report states that frontloading – improving the quality of first instance decisions – could lead to significant savings.
Prejem podatkov o teh stroških pa je zelo pomemben za izdelavo zanesljive in natančne ocene zneskov, ki bi jih s prenovitvijo dolgoročno privarčevali.
However, information on these costs is crucial for a reliable and accurate assessment of the savings that could be achieved in the long term through the recast.
Ali lahko Komisija pripravi primerjalno študijo teh stroškov?
Can the Commission commit itself to providing a comparative study of these costs?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0171/2010
Question for oral answer O-0171/2010
Zadeva: Izredni načrt Skupnosti za boj proti spletnemu piratstvu
Subject: Extraordinary Community plan to combat online piracy
Pojav nezakonitega razširjanja gradiva, ki je predmet varstva pravic intelektualne lastnine, ogroža razcvet zakonitega trga z e-vsebinami, ki je uspešen segment v nasprotju s siceršnjo krizo.
The illegal distribution of materials protected by intellectual property rights is a phenomenon that is jeopardising the take-off of legal e-content markets – a segment that is meeting with success and shows signs of bucking the trend as regards the crisis.
Nedavna študija, ki jo je pripravil Ovum v Združenem kraljestvu, je pokazala, da bi lahko internetni ponudniki storitev precej izboljšali svoje prihodke s ponudbo zakonitih glasbenih storitev.
A recent study by Ovum in the United Kingdom showed how Internet service providers could increase their revenue considerably by offering legal music services.
Študija, objavljena marca 2010, je pokazala, da bi ta podjetja z naložbami v glasbene storitve, namenjene povprečnemu potrošniku, v 3 letih lahko ustvarila 100 milijonov britanskih funtov.
The study, published in March 2010, concluded that it would be possible for these companies to generate GBP 100 million in three years by investing in music in a medium-level service adoption scenario.
Francija, Britanija in sedaj Španija (kjer se je od leta 1999 do danes zaradi nezakonite izmenjave datotek trg zmanjšal za 60 %) so sprejele stroge predpise, da bi se zoperstavile nezakonitemu spletnemu širjenju avtorskih del.
France, Britain and now Spain (which has seen its own market plummet by 60 % since 1999 thanks to illegal file-sharing) have adopted stringent laws to prevent the illegal distribution of copyrighted works via the Internet.
To jasno kaže, da se posamezne vlade vse bolj zavedajo, da se morajo odločno odzvati, tudi s sprejemanjem novih predpisov za varovanje ustvarjalnih del.
It is plain to see that individual governments are becoming more and more aware of the need for major action, including the adoption of new laws, to protect creative works.
Da bi se boril proti piratstvu, pravni sistem Skupnosti že zagotavlja varovanje avtorskih pravic.
The EU’s legal system is already geared up to safeguard copyright against piracy.
Ali namerava Komisija izkoristiti priložnost za uresničitev vseevropskega izrednega načrta Skupnosti za boj proti spletnemu piratstvu, tudi s sprejetjem ukrepa za določitev novih sredstev boja proti piratstvu in ponarejanju?
However, does the Commission intend to take the opportunity for ‘pan-European’ joint action to set up an extraordinary Community plan to combat online piracy, one that would include the adoption of a measure to identify new ways of fighting piracy and counterfeiting?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0172/2010
Question for oral answer O-0172/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Izvajanje sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Rusijo o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Implementation of the EU-Russia visa facilitation agreement
Namen sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Rusko federacijo o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov, ki je začel veljati 1. junija 2007, je bistveno poenostaviti izdajanje vizumov in upravne postopke tako za ruske državljane, ki potujejo v Evropsko unijo, kot za državljane Evropske unije, ki potujejo v Rusijo.
The visa facilitation agreement between the European Union and the Russian Federation entered into force on 1 June 2007 with the objective of substantially facilitating the issuing of visas and simplifying administrative procedures, for both Russian citizens travelling to the European Union and EU nationals travelling in Russia.
V sporazumu je navedeno, da bi bilo treba doseči obojestransko ukinitev vizumov, ruske oblasti pa so tudi večkrat zahtevale nadaljnje ukrepe za vzpostavitev režima potovanj brez vizumov.
The agreement reiterated that the objective should be visa-free travel on a reciprocal basis and the Russian authorities have regularly repeated their request that further steps should be taken towards full visa-free travel.
Toda predpogoj za napredek v tej smeri je dosledno in obojestransko izvajanje veljavnega sporazuma, pri čemer bi morale države članice Evropske unije in Ruska federacija izpolniti obveze, ki izhajajo iz njega.
However, the prerequisite for such further steps is that the existing agreement on visa facilitation should be fully implemented in a completely reciprocal way and that both the EU Member States and the Russian Federation should honour the commitments it sets out.
Ali Komisija meni, da vse države članice Evropske unije v celoti izvajajo ta sporazum?
Does the Commission consider that all the EU Member States have fully implemented the 2007 visa facilitation agreement with the Russian Federation?
Ali meni, da ga Rusija zadovoljivo izvaja, natančneje njegov člen 10, saj od tujcev, vključno z državljani Evropske unije, še vedno zahteva, da se prijavijo, če bivajo pri zasebnikih?
Does the Commission regard Russia's implementation of the visa facilitation agreement, more specifically as regards Article 10 of the said agreement, as satisfactory, in particular as there is still a requirement for foreigners, including EU citizens, to register with the authorities if staying in a private home?
Ali bo objavila oceno o dosedanjem delovanju sporazuma in njegovem vplivu na medosebne in poslovne stike med Evropsko unijo in Rusijo?
Will the Commission publish an assessment of how the visa facilitation agreement has worked so far and of its impact on people-to-people and business contacts between the EU and Russia?
Ali lahko Komisija posreduje tudi najnovejše informacije glede sporazumov z drugimi državami vzhodnega partnerstva o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov?
Can the Commission also provide updated information on visa facilitation agreements with other Eastern Partnership countries?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0173/2010
Question for oral answer O-0173/2010
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Razmere v Zahodni Sahari
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Situation in Western Sahara