natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali je Komisija prav tako kot Parlament prepričana (resoluciji z 20. novembra 2008 in 22. aprila 2004), da je treba evropsko čebelarstvo podpreti na obsežnejši in bolj usklajen način, z uporabo dodatnih instrumentov v prihodnji skupni kmetijski politiki (na primer z ukrepi za krepitev biotske raznolikosti, omilitev posledic podnebnih sprememb in drugih)?
Does the Commission share Parliament’s conviction (resolutions of 20 November 2008 and 22 April 2004) that European apiculture should be supported in an even broader and more coherent manner using additional instruments in the future CAP (e.g. measures in favour of enhancing biodiversity, mitigating the effects of climate change, etc.)?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0120/2010
Question for oral answer O-0120/2010
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Konferenca o podnebnih spremembah v Cancunu (COP16)
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: Climate Change Conference in Cancun (COP16)
Katere konkretne zunanje ukrepe načrtuje Svet, da bi obnovil zaupanje v pogajalski proces pred konferenco o podnebnih spremembah v Cancunu in med njo (kar zadeva oba tira pogajanj, torej drugo ciljno obdobje kjotskega protokola 2013–2020 in dolgoročne ukrepe za sodelovanje do leta 2050)?
What concrete external actions is the Council planning in order to re-establish trust in the negotiating process prior to and during the climate conference in Cancun (as regards both strands of the negotiations, i.e. the second commitment period for the Kyoto Protocol, 2013-2020, and long-term cooperative action up to 2050)?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0121/2010
Question for oral answer O-0121/2010
Katere konkretne zunanje ukrepe načrtuje Komisija, da bi obnovila zaupanje v pogajalski proces pred konferenco o podnebnih spremembah v Cancunu in med njo (na obeh tirih pogajanj, torej drugem ciljnem obdobju kjotskega protokola 2013–2020 in dolgoročnih ukrepih za sodelovanje do leta 2050)?
What concrete external actions is the Commission planning in order to re-establish trust in the negotiating process prior to and during the climate conference in Cancun (as regards both strands of the negotiations, i.e. the second commitment period for the Kyoto Protocol, 2013-2020, and long-term cooperative action up to 2050)?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0122/2010
Question for oral answer O-0122/2010
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Posledice iztekanja nafte v Mehiškem zalivu zaradi nesreče na ploščadi Deepwater Horizon za EU: ukrepi na področju črpanja in iskanja nafte v Evropi
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: Implications of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill for the EU: action on oil extraction and exploration in Europe
Ali lahko Svet glede na iztekanje nafte v Mehiškem zalivu zaradi nesreče na ploščadi Deepwater Horizon in v luči svojega prihodnjega odločanja pojasni, katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti, da bi zagotovil varnost in zaščito dejavnosti črpanja nafte ter na področju visoke ravni varstva okolja in preprečevanja nesreč v EU?
In the light of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and in view of its forthcoming deliberations, can the Council explain the measures which it intends to take to guarantee the safety and security of oil extraction operations and in the area of high-level environmental protection and disaster prevention in the EU?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0123/2010
Question for oral answer O-0123/2010
Ali lahko Komisija – glede na iztekanje nafte v Mehiškem zalivu zaradi nesreče na ploščadi Deepwater Horizon – pojasni, katere ukrepe je sprejela, da bi zagotovila varnost in zaščito pri dejavnosti črpanja nafte ter na področju visoke ravni varstva okolja in preprečevanja nesreč v EU?
In the light of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, can the Commission explain the action it is taking to guarantee the safety and security of oil extraction operations and in the area of high-level environmental protection and disaster prevention in the EU?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0124/2010
Question for oral answer O-0124/2010
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Preglednost in stanje pogajanj o okvirnem sporazumu med EU in Libijo
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Transparency and state of play of negotiations on a framework agreement between the EU and Libya
Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 9. februarja 2010 o okvirnem sporazumu med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo ( P7_TA(2010)0009 ) zahteva takojšnje in popolno obveščanje na vseh stopnjah pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih, da bi imel člen 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije poln učinek.
In its resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission ( P7_TA(2010)0009 ) Parliament demands immediate and full information at every stage of negotiations on international agreements, to give full effect to Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Komisija je 27. januarja 2010 potrdila svojo zavezo o okrepljenem sodelovanju s Parlamentom v skladu s to resolucijo.
On 27 January 2010 the Commission gave assurances of its commitment to a reinforced association with Parliament in the terms of this resolution.
Kljub tej zavezi doslej ni hotela razkriti mandata za pogajanja z Libijo in druga temeljna besedila.
Despite these commitments, the Commission has so far refused to disclose the mandate for the negotiations with Libya and other primary texts.
Če bo še naprej vztrajno zavračala zagotavljanje zadostnih informacij Parlamentu, bi lahko ta proti njej sprožil postopek zaradi nezakonitega ukrepanja.
In the event of persistent refusal to provide it with sufficient information, Parliament could, therefore, initiate proceedings against the Commission for illegal failure to act.
Poleg tega Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 17. junija 2010 o usmrtitvah v Libiji ( P7_TA(2010)0246 ) zahteva, da mora biti vsakršno sodelovanje ali sporazum med EU in Libijo pogojeno z ratifikacijo in izvajanjem ženevske konvencije o beguncih s strani Libije ter drugih poglavitnih konvencij in protokolov o človekovih pravicah.
Moreover, in its resolution of 17 June 2010 on executions in Libya ( P7_TA(2010)0246 ), Parliament requires that any cooperation or agreement between the EU and Libya be contingent on the ratification and implementation by Libya of the Geneva Convention on Refugees, and other major human rights conventions and protocols.
Kdaj bo Komisija Parlamentu omogočila dostop do vseh poglavitnih besedil, povezanih z okvirnim sporazumom, o katerem potekajo pogajanja, zlasti do pogajalskega mandata Sveta in poročil o pogajalskih krogih, vključno z osnutki poglavij okvirnega sporazuma?
When will the Commission grant Parliament access to all primary texts relating to the framework agreement under negotiation, in particular the Council’s negotiation mandate and the reports of the negotiation rounds, including draft chapters of the framework agreement?
Ali se visoka predstavnica strinja, da je treba Parlamentu omogočiti dostop do omenjenih dokumentov, preden začne veljati zadevni okvirni sporazum?
Does the High Representative agree that Parliament should be granted access to the above-mentioned documents before the framework agreement comes into effect?
Ali namerava Komisija o vprašanjih migracijske politike razpravljati na vrhunskem srečanju med EU in Afriko novembra v Tripoliju, ob upoštevanju resolucije Parlamenta z dne 17. junija 2010, in kako namerava o tem obveščati Parlament?
Does the Commission intend to discuss matters of migration policy at the EU-Africa summit in Tripoli in November, bearing in mind Parliament’s resolution of 17 June 2010, and how does it intend to keep Parliament informed on the matter?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0125/2010
Question for oral answer O-0125/2010
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Socialne storitve splošnega pomena
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Social services of general interest
Unija si prizadeva za blaginjo njenih narodov in trajnostni razvoj Evrope, ki temelji na uravnoteženi gospodarski rasti in stabilnosti cen, ter za visoko konkurenčno socialno tržno gospodarstvo, usmerjeno v polno zaposlenost in socialni napredek (člen 3, Pogodba o Evropski uniji).
The Union’s aims are the well-being of its peoples and the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability and a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress (Article 3, Treaty on European Union).
Vlade držav članic, nacionalni parlamenti in Evropski parlament so na zahtevo svojih volivcev okrepili pravno podlago za socialne storitve splošnega pomena.
Member State governments, national parliaments and the European Parliament, following the demands of their electorates, have strengthened the legal base for social services of general interest (SSGI).
Člen 9 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije navaja, da Unija „pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju svojih politik in dejavnosti [...] upošteva zahteve, ki so povezane s spodbujanjem visoke stopnje zaposlenosti, zagotavljanjem ustrezne socialne zaščite, bojem proti socialni izključenosti in visoko stopnjo izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter varovanjem človekovega zdravja“.
Article 9 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union states that, ‘in defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union shall take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health’.
Parlament, Komisija in Svet morajo zagotoviti uveljavitev teh novih določb v kar največji meri, da bi socialne storitve splošnega pomena vključili v naš evropski socialni in ekonomski model.
Parliament, the Commission and the Council have to ensure that these new provisions are used to the fullest extent to embed SSGI in our European social and economic model.
Oblasti v državah članicah, tako nacionalne, regionalne kot lokalne, potrebujejo tudi pravno varnost.
The authorities in the Member States, national, regional and local, also need legal certainty.
Ali torej Komisija priznava, da potrebujemo novo večstransko delovno skupino na visoki ravni, če želimo v celoti uresničiti nove določbe Pogodb o okrepljeni socialni razsežnosti Evrope ter zagotoviti proaktivno izvajanje teh določb in odpraviti težave, s katerimi se nekateri izvajalci socialnih storitev splošnega pomena soočajo zaradi sedanje razlage pravil enotnega trga?
Will the Commission therefore accept that, in order to take full account of the new Treaty provisions on the enhanced social dimension of Europe, and to ensure a proactive implementation of those provisions and overcome the difficulties that some providers of SSGI are experiencing with the current interpretation of single-market rules, there is a need for a high-level, multi-stakeholder taskforce?
Cilj in mandat takšne delovne skupine bi bil usmerjanje postopnega izvajanja političnih in pravnih prilagoditev, ki so potrebne za polno uresničitev socialne in ekonomske vloge socialnih storitev splošnega pomena v evropski družbi, kot predvideva Lizbonska pogodba.
The taskforce’s objective and mandate would be to steer step-by-step implementation of the policy and legal adaptations necessary to ensure full realisation of the social and economic role which SSGI can play in European society, as envisaged by the Lisbon Treaty.
Takšni delovni skupini bi lahko predsedoval komisar za socialne zadeve, vključevala pa bi lahko predstavnike generalnih direktoratov za konkurenco, enotni trg, ekonomske in finančne zadeve, Parlamenta, Sveta, Odbora regij, socialnih partnerjev in organizacij civilne družbe.
Such a taskforce could be chaired by the Commissioner for Social Affairs and could include representatives from DG Competition, DG Single Market, DG Economic and Financial Affairs, Parliament, the Council, the Committee of the Regions, the social partners and civil-society organisations.
Njen mandat bi lahko trajal dve leti, po izteku pa bi sledil pregled.
Its mandate could run for two years, subject to review.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0126/2010
Question for oral answer O-0126/2010
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Uvoz blaga, proizvedenega v delovnih taboriščih laogai, v Evropsko unijo
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Import of Laogai-made Goods into the European Union
Laogai je sistem zaporov s prisilnim delom v Ljudski republiki Kitajski.
Laogai is the system of forced labour prisons in the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Sistem laogai je Evropski parlament že obsodil, redno pa se obravnava tudi v dialogu o človekovih pravicah med EU in Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko.
The Laogai system has been condemned by Parliament and is a regular topic in the EU-PRC Human Rights Dialogue.
Imena prikrivajo resnično naravo proizvodov, ki se v njih izdelujejo in se tako prosto prodajajo v Ljudski republiki Kitajski in zunaj nje.
These names hide the true nature of the products being produced, which are thus sold freely in and outside the PRC.
Dokaze za takšno prakso lahko najdemo v številnih poslovnih katalogih, pri čemer vodi katalog družbe Dun & Bradstreet, v katerem je navedenih 330 poznanih zaporov laogai.
Proof of this practice is found in many business catalogues, first and foremost in Dun & Bradstreet, which lists 330 known Laogai prisons.
Čeprav so dokazi za to redki, so taborišča laogai po vsej verjetnosti tudi vir številnih ponarejenih izdelkov iz Kitajske.
Though rarely proven, Laogai is most probably also the source of many Chinese-made counterfeit products.
Združene države Amerike so z uporabo zakona o prepovedi uvoza blaga, ki ga proizvajajo zaporniki, prepovedale prodajo proizvodov, ki prihajajo iz številnih tovrstnih družb, na trgu ZDA.
Applying its law prohibiting the import of convict-made goods, the US has banned products emanating from several such companies from the US market.
– Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je treba potrošnike in družbe iz EU zaščititi pred nenamernim nakupom blaga, proizvedenega v taboriščih laogai,
– Considering that EU consumers and companies must be protected against inadvertently purchasing Laogai-made goods, and
– ter ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta, ki obsoja sistem laogai, in resolucije o dialogu o človekovih pravicah med EU in Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko,
– having regard to Parliament’s resolutions condemning the Laogai system and to the EU-PRC Human Rights Dialogues;
katere ukrepe bo sprejela Komisija, da bi preprečila neposredni oziroma posredni uvoz blaga, proizvedenega v taboriščih laogai ali drugih zaporih, v EU?
What actions will the Commission take in order to prevent the direct or indirect import of Laogai and/or other convict-made goods into the EU?
Kdaj bo Komisija začela tesno sodelovati z organi ZDA, zlasti s carino, na področju odkrivanja tovrstnega blaga?
When will the Commission start to cooperate as closely as possible with the US authorities – namely US Customs – on the matter of detecting these goods?
Kdaj namerava Komisija začeti pogajanja z Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko, da bi dosegla obojestransko zavezujoč dogovor, v skladu s katerim bo Ljudska republika Kitajska preprečevala neposredni ali posredni izvoz proizvodov iz taborišč laogai v EU in/ali njihovo prodajo družbam v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, katerih lastniki so iz EU?
When will the Commission start negotiations with the PRC in order to obtain a mutually binding agreement that the PRC will prevent the direct or indirect export of Laogai-made goods to the EU and/or their sale to EU-owned companies in the PRC?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0127/2010
Question for oral answer O-0127/2010
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Letalske dejavnosti v sistemu za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community
Cilj Direktive 2008/101/ES je vključiti letalske dejavnosti v sistem za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti.
The aim of Directive 2008/101/EC was to include aviation in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, and it does not apply only to airlines in the EU; not only flights within Europe, but also flights to third countries fall under the directive.
Uporablja se ne samo za letalske družbe v EU in lete v Evropi, temveč tudi za tretje države.
From 1 January 2012, all flights arriving at or departing from an EU airport will be included in the scheme.
Od 1. januarja 2012 bodo v sistem vključeni vsi leti z letališč v Evropski uniji ali na nanje, torej bodo vključeni vsi operaterji, ki nudijo takšne lete, ne glede na to, ali so iz EU ali ne.
Operators from all states providing such flights will therefore be included, regardless of whether they are based in the EU.
Evropska unija pri tem meni, da je direktiva zgolj prvi ukrep za dosego njenega končnega cilja, tj. globalnega sektorskega sporazuma o zmanjševanju emisij toplogrednih plinov v letalstvu.
In this context, the EU considers that this directive is only a first step towards its final goal of a global sect oral agreement concerning the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from aviation.
Zakonodaja vsebuje tudi določbe, ki omogočajo prilaganje v primerih, ko tretje države sprejmejo podobne ukrepe za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v svojem letalskem sektorju.
The legislation also contains provisions that allow its adjustment should third countries adopt similar measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from their aviation sectors.
Vendar pa so tretje države pred nekaj dnevi pozvale Mednarodno organizacijo za civilno letalstvo, naj sprejeme resolucijo, v kateri bo zapisala, da države, ki želijo uresničevati sistem za trgovanje z emisijami, ki se uporablja za operaterje zrakoplovov iz drugih držav pogodbenic, lahko to storijo le ob vzajemnem dogovoru.
But in recent days, third countries have urged the International Civil Aviation Organisation to pass a resolution stating that countries ‘seeking to implement an emissions trading system that applies to other contracting states’ aircraft operators’ do so only ‘on the basis of mutual agreement’.
Generalna skupščina Mednarodne organizacije za civilno letalstvo se bo sestala konec tega meseca.
The meeting of the assembly of the ICAO will take place at the end of this month.
Ali lahko Komisija sporoči, kakšna je njena pogajalska strategija?
Could the Commission provide information's about its negotiation strategy?
V kolikšni meri je pri pogajanjih upoštevano stališče Evropskega parlamenta?
To what extent is the position of the European Parliament being taken into account in the negotiations?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0128/2010
Question for oral answer O-0128/2010
Unija si prizadeva za blaginjo njenih narodov, trajnostni razvoj Evrope, ki temelji na uravnoteženi gospodarski rasti in stabilnosti cen, ter visoko konkurenčno socialno tržno gospodarstvo, usmerjeno v polno zaposlenost in socialni napredek (člen 3, PEU).
The Union’s aim is the well-being of its peoples, sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, and a highly competitive social market economy aiming at full employment and social progress (Article 3, Treaty on European Union).
Vlade držav članic, nacionalni parlamenti in Evropski parlament so na zahtevo svojih volivcev okrepili pravno podlago za socialne storitve splošnega pomena.
Member State governments, national parliaments and the European Parliament, following the demands of their electorates, have strengthened the legal base for Social Services of General Interest.
Člen 9 navaja, da Unija „pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju svojih politik in dejavnosti [...] upošteva zahteve, ki so povezane s spodbujanjem visoke stopnje zaposlenosti, zagotavljanjem ustrezne socialne zaščite, bojem proti socialni izključenosti in visoko stopnjo izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter varovanjem človekovega zdravja“.
Article 9 states that in defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union shall ‘take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health’.
Evropski parlament, Komisija in Svet morajo zagotoviti uveljavitev teh novih določb v kar največji meri, da bi socialne storitve splošnega pomena vključili v naš evropski socialni in ekonomski model.
The European Parliament, the Commission and the Council must ensure that these new provisions are used to the fullest extent to embed SSGI in our European social and economic model.
Oblasti v državah članicah, tako nacionalne, regionalne kot lokalne, potrebujejo tudi pravno varnost.
The authorities in the Member States – national, regional and local – also need legal certainty.
Ali torej Svet priznava, da potrebujemo novo večstransko delovno skupino na visoki ravni, če želimo v celoti uresničiti nove določbe Pogodb o okrepljeni socialni razsežnosti Evrope, zagotoviti proaktivno izvajanje teh določb in odpraviti težave, s katerimi se nekateri izvajalci socialnih storitev splošnega pomena soočajo zaradi sedanje razlage pravil enotnega trga?
Will the Council therefore accept that in order to take full account of the new Treaty provisions on the enhanced social dimension of Europe, to ensure a proactive implementation of those provisions and to overcome the difficulties that some providers of SSGI are experiencing with the current interpretation of single market rules, there is a need for a high-level multi-stakeholder taskforce.
Cilj in mandat takšne delovne skupine bi bil usmerjanje postopnega izvajanja političnih in pravnih prilagoditev, ki so potrebne za polno uresničitev socialne in ekonomske vloge socialnih storitev splošnega pomena v evropski družbi, kot predvideva Lizbonska pogodba.
The taskforce’s objective and mandate would be to guide step-by-step implementation of the policy and legal adaptations necessary to ensure full realisation of the social and economic role which SSGI can play in European society, as envisaged by the Lisbon Treaty.
Takšni delovni skupini bi lahko predsedoval komisar za socialne zadeve, vključevala pa bi lahko predstavnike generalnih direktoratov za konkurenco, enotni trg ter ekonomske in finančne zadeve, Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta, Odbora regij, socialnih partnerjev in organizacij civilne družbe.
Such a taskforce could be chaired by the Commissioner for Social Affairs and could have representatives on it of DG Competition, DG Single Market and DG Economic and Financial Affairs, the European Parliament, the Council, the Committee of the Regions, the Social Partners and civil society organisations.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0129/2010
Question for oral answer O-0129/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Posledice odprtja trga konkurenčnim izdelkom iz Pakistana za tekstilno industrijo EU
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Consequences for the EU textile industry of competition from products from Pakistan
– bodo na pogajanjih najbrž obravnavane različne možnosti: na primer carinska stopnja nič, klavzula o državi z največjimi ugodnostmi (MFN) ali predlog o oprostitvi, ki jo odobri STO;
– A number of arrangements could be up for discussion, including zero duties, the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) clause, or a proposal for a WTO waiver.
– bo vsaka od teh možnosti dramatično vplivala na prihodnost portugalske in evropske tekstilne industrije;
– Any of those proposals would be disastrous for the future of the textile industry in Portugal and Europe.
– ta sektor na Portugalskem predstavlja 11 % celotnega izvoza, 22 % zaposlitev, 8 % prometa ter 7 % proizvodnje predelovalne industrije;
– In Portugal, that industry currently accounts for 11% of all exports, and for 22% of employment, 8% of turnover and 7% of production in all manufacturing industries.
– tekstilni sektor prav tako predstavlja pomemben del evropskega BDP in zaposlitev;
– The textile industry also accounts for a substantial proportion of both employment and GDP in the EU.