natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kako namerava Komisija s pomočjo reforme skupne ribiške politike v prihodnji protokol vključiti nove smernice zunanje razsežnosti skupne ribiške politike, vključno s klavzulo o človekovih pravicah, kot je navedeno v priporočilu Svetu za osnutek pooblastila?
How does the Commission intend to use the forthcoming CFP reform to incorporate the new guidelines for the external dimension of the CFP - including the human rights clauses - in the future protocol, as mentioned in the recommendation to the Council for a draft mandate?
Kako bi lahko Komisija zagotovila nadaljnji razvoj odgovorne in trajne ribiške politike (vključno s preprečevanjem nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in zakonsko neurejenega ribolova in z vlaganji sektorja EU), da bi podprla gospodarski razvoj in cilje za ohranitev ribolovnih virov v Mavretaniji?
How could the Commission ensure the further development of responsible and sustainable fisheries policies (including the fight against IUU fishing and investments by the EU sector), to support both economic development and resource conservation objectives in Mauritania?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000039/2011
Question for oral answer O-000039/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Učinek iskanja nekonvencionalnega plina v Evropi
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Impact of unconventional gas exploration in Europe
Z iskanjem nekonvencionalnega plina, pretežno plina iz skrilavca, v Združenih državah Amerike se je spremenil svetovni trg plina.
Unconventional gas, mainly shale gas, exploration in the United States has changed the world's gas market.
V evropska pristanišča prihaja več utekočinjenega zemeljskega plina, na energetskih trgih je več konkurence in čedalje večjo vlogo imajo preglednejše in fleksibilnejše pogodbe za krajša obdobja, pri katerih so namesto mehanizmov za oblikovanje cen, ki so povezani z nafto, čedalje bolj pomembne promptne cene plina.
We see more LNG coming into European ports and more competition in energy markets, with a growing role for shorter, more transparent and flexible contracts, where spot prices for gas play a more and more important role in place of oil-related pricing mechanisms.
Zanimanje za iskanje nekonvencionalnega plina v Evropi, zlasti na Poljskem, v Nemčiji in Franciji, narašča.
There is a growing interest in unconventional gas exploration in Europe, mainly in Poland, Germany and France.
Ali je Komisija ocenila učinek iskanja nekonvencionalnega plina na evropski energetski sektor, vključno z zanesljivo preskrbo in zmanjšanjem emisij toplogrednih plinov v Evropi pred letom 2020?
Has the Commission assessed the impact of unconventional gas exploration on the European energy sector, including security of supply and reduction of GHG emissions in Europe ahead of 2020?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje možnosti, ki jih ponuja to novo iskanje plina v Evropi, v smislu poslovnih in pravnih izzivov, ki nas čakajo?
How does the Commission assess the opportunities presented by this new gas exploration in Europe in terms of the business and legal challenges ahead?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000040/2011
Question for oral answer O-000040/2011
v imenu Odbora za peticije Zadeva: Peticija 1565/2009, ki jo je vložil José Maria Pozancos (španski državljan), o uvozu paradižnika iz Maroka v EU
on behalf of the Committee on Petitions Subject: Petition 1565/2009 by José Maria Pozancos (Spanish) on EU tomato imports from Morocco
Odbor za peticije Evropskega parlamenta je poslušal pritožbe španskega združenja proizvajalcev in izvoznikov sadja, zelenjave in rož (FEPEX) glede domnevnega nepravilnega uvoza paradižnikov iz Maroka.
The Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament has heard complaints from the Spanish Federation of Producers and Exporters of Fruit, Vegetables and Flowers (FEPEX) concerning alleged irregular imports of tomatoes from Morocco.
Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam soglaša, da je vzrok za te nepravilnosti zloraba metode odbitkov, zagotovljene z Uredbo (ES) št. 3223/94, ki vzpostavlja tri različne metode za izračun vstopne cene v EU.
OLAF is in agreement that the origin of these irregularities is the abusive application of the method for deduction provided for by Regulation (EC) No 3223/94, which establishes three different methods for the calculation of the entry price into the EU.
Uporaba omenjene metode je udeležencem omogočila, da so se izognili plačilu dodatnih obveznosti, ki jih zagotavlja zakonodaja, ko so cene in uvozne vrednosti nižje od vstopne cene, ki jo določi EU.
The use of the said method has afforded operators the possibility of evading payment of additional duties provided for by the legislation when prices and import values are below the entry price set by the EU.
Na ta način in kot je imel priložnost ugotoviti Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam, so te razmere povzročile izgubo carinskega prihodka za EU.
In this way and as OLAF had occasion to note, this situation has caused a loss of customs revenue for the EU.
Poleg tega so bili proizvajalci paradižnika v Evropi oškodovani zaradi posledic, ki jih ima tak uvoz na ravni cen paradižnika na trgu EU.
In addition, European tomato producers have been harmed by the impact these imports have on the level of tomato prices in the EU market.
Ali lahko Komisija razloži, zakaj ni ukrepala, da bi spremenila režim vstopne cene za paradižnike, da bi preprečila take prakse zlorabe, na katere je opozoril Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam?
Can the Commission explain why it has not taken any measures to modify the entry price regime for tomatoes in order to put a stop to these abusive practices highlighted by OLAF?
Ali se Komisiji take spremembe ne zdijo nujne, glede na to, da je v novem kmetijskem poglavju pridružitvenega sporazuma z Marokom zagotovljeno povečanje uvoza paradižnika v EU?
Does the Commission not think that it should make such changes without delay, bearing in mind that the new agricultural chapter of the Association Agreement with Morocco provides for an increase in tomato imports to the EU?
Ali je Komisija zagotovila kakršne koli ukrepe, da bi ji bile povrnjene neplačane carine?
Has the Commission provided for any measures to recuperate the unpaid customs duties?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000041/2011
Question for oral answer O-000041/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Strategija o surovinah za Evropo
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Raw materials strategy for Europe
Evropska industrija nima zadostnega dostopa do potrebnih surovin ter industrijskega in znanstvenega znanja za njihovo obdelavo, kar je potrebno za povečanje njene konkurenčnosti.
European industry lacks access to necessary raw materials and to the industrial and scientific know-how required to process them, although both are necessary to increase the competitiveness of European industry.
Redki zemeljski elementi so ključnega pomena za stotine visokotehnoloških aplikacij in za razvoj okolju prijaznih tehnologij.
Rare earth elements (REEs) are of critical importance for hundreds of high-tech applications, and the key to the development of green technologies.
Trenutno je industrija EU popolnoma odvisna od redkih zemeljskih elementov s Kitajske, ki ima monopol nad svetovno proizvodnjo.
Currently, EU industry entirely depends on REE imports from China, which has the global production monopoly.
Ali ima EU celostno strategijo za redke zemeljske elemente?
Does the EU have a comprehensive strategy on REEs?
Ali strategija načrtuje možen dvig cen zaradi kitajskih omejitev izvoza?
Does the strategy cater for a possible rise in prices as a result of Chinese export restrictions?
Ali obstaja ocena o kritičnosti zalog redkih zemeljskih elementov za evropsko industrijo?
Has the critical nature of REE supplies for European industry been assessed?
Kaj je po mnenju Komisije možna vloga recikliranja v primerjavi z možnostmi, ki jih nudita trgovinska politika in dostop do lastnih virov?
In the Commission’s opinion, what role could recycling play in view of the opportunities provided by trade policy and the availability of own resources?
Ali ima Komisija na voljo sredstva, da oceni, koliko politika recikliranja stane evropsko industrijo?
Does the Commission have the means at its disposal to assess the costs of the recycling policy for European industry?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000042/2011
Question for oral answer O-000042/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Vzpostavitev skupnega programa EU za ponovno naselitev
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Establishment of a joint EU resettlement programme
Po podatkih UNHCR je treba vsako leto v tretjih državah ponovno naseliti okrog 200.000 beguncev.
According to the UNHCR, around 200 000 refugees need to be resettled into a third country every year.
Medtem ko se vsako leto v ZDA, Kanadi, Avstraliji, Braziliji in Čilu ponovno naseli okrog 100.000 beguncev, se ponovna naselitev v Evropi skoraj ne uporablja: trenutno jo izvaja 10 držav članic, kar obsega skupaj komaj 4500 beguncev, ki jih vsako leto gosti EU.
While around 100 000 refugees are annually resettled to the US, Canada, Australia, Brazil and Chile, resettlement is scarcely used in Europe: currently, 10 Member States carry out resettlement, which represents a total number of only 4 500 refugees annually hosted by the EU.
Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve (LIBE) je na svoji seji 23. februarja 2010 podprl idejo o ambicioznem programu EU za ponovno naselitev in predstavil dva osnutka poročil: enega o sporočilu Evropske komisije o programu EU za ponovno naselitev, drugega o predlaganih spremembah pravil Evropskega sklada za begunce (ESB).
The European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE), in its session of 23 February 2010, supported the idea of an ambitious EU resettlement programme and presented two draft reports: one on the Communication of the European Commission on the EU resettlement programme, and another on the proposed amendments to the European Refugee Fund (ERF).
Evropski parlament je maja 2010 s prepričljivo večino podprl obe poročili, o politični vsebini teh poročil pa je bil med Komisijo, Svetom in EP dosežen pravi konsenz.
Both reports were approved by a large majority of the EP in May 2010, and there was a real consensus between the Commission, the Council and the EP with regard to the political content of these reports.
Od glasovanja v EP je preteklo skoraj leto dni, ker pa v prvi obravnavi ni roka za zaključek, še zmeraj čakamo, da bo Svet zaključil postopek soodločanja; pri tem smo že zgubili eno leto (2011) finančne podpore novim državam gostiteljicam v EU.
Almost one year after the vote by the EP - and as first reading does not have a deadline for completion - we are still waiting for the Council to complete the codecision procedure and we have already lost one year (2011) of financial support to the new EU host countries.
Ali namerava Svet zaključek tega postopka soodločanja uvrstiti na svoj seznam prednostnih nalog?
Is the Council intending to put the completion of this codecision procedure in its agenda of priorities?
Širše gledano, ali bo Svet še naprej blokiral vse zakonodajne akte, ki ob upoštevanju Lizbonske pogodbe vsebujejo delegirane akte o finančnih zadevah?
And, on a more general note, will the Council persist in blocking all the legislation that provides, as endorsed by the Lisbon Treaty, for delegated acts on financial matters?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000043/2011/rev.1
Question for oral answer O-000043/2011/rev.1
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Zagotavljanje evropskih zalog redkih zemelj
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Securing Europe's supply of rare earth elements
Redke zemlje so ključnega pomena za stotine visokotehnoloških aplikacij in za razvoj okolju prijaznih tehnologij, kot so turbine na vetrni pogon in hibridna vozila.
Rare earth elements (REE) are critical to hundreds of high-tech applications, and key to the development of green technologies such as wind-powered turbines and hybrid vehicles.
Industrija EU je trenutno v celoti odvisna od uvoza redkih zemelj s Kitajske, ki nadzoruje 97 % svetovne proizvodnje.
EU industry currently depends totally on REE imports from China, which controls 97% of world production.
Poleg tega je Kitajska že napovedala občutne omejitve pri izvažanju teh elementov, svetovno povpraševanje po njih pa narašča.
Furthermore, while global demand for REE rises, China has already announced significant export restrictions.
Ocenjuje se, da bo že leta 2014 primanjkljaj svetovne proizvodnje redkih zemelj znašal 40.000 ton.
It is estimated that already in 2014 a global production shortfall of 40 000 tonnes of REE will exist.
Katere kratkoročne ukrepe predlaga Komisija v zvezi s temi elementi v skladu s stebri iz evropske pobude za surovine?
What possible short-term measures is the Commission proposing to take regarding REE, in accordance with the pillars set out in the European Raw Materials Initiative (RMI)?
Kako namerava Komisija pristopiti k občutljivemu vprašanju redkih zemelj v rednem dialogu s Kitajsko ter v okviru sporazuma o trgovinskem in gospodarskem sodelovanju ter potekajočih pogajanj za sklenitev sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med EU in Kitajsko?
How does the Commission intend to deal with the sensitive REE issue in its regular dialogue with China and within the trade and economic cooperation agreement and the ongoing negotiations for the EU China partnership and cooperation agreement?
Katere ukrepe so Evropska komisija in njeni partnerji sprejeli, da bi zagotovili alternativne vire redkih zemelj in zmanjšala tveganje pri dobavi za evropsko industrijo?
What steps has the EC taken, along with its partners, to establish alternative sources of REE and minimise the supply risk for European industry?
Ali je Komisija preučila možnost sklenitve dolgoročnih trgovinskih sporazumov z drugimi državami in regionalnimi organizacijami, ki proizvajajo redke zemlje, kot so latinskoameriške države, Avstralija in Kanada?
Has the Commission considered securing long-term trade agreements with other countries and regional organisations which produce REE, such as Latin-American countries, Australia and Canada?
Ali Komisija razmišlja o možnosti, da bi pripravila program shranjevanja zalog teh materialov (kot so to že storile ZDA, Japonska in Koreja), da bi zagotovila ustrezno dobavo redkih zemelj in stabilnost njihove cene, saj se ti elementi ne uporabljajo zgolj za visokotehnološke naprave in okolju prijazno tehnologijo, ampak tudi v pomembne medicinske in obrambne namene?
Given that REE are necessary not only for high-tech appliances and green technologies but also for critical medical and defence applications, is the Commission considering the possibility of setting up a European stockpiling scheme for these materials (following similar moves by the US, Japan and Korea) in order to enable adequate REE supply and price stability?
Kakšne so možnosti reciklaže redkih zemelj v EU?
What are the prospects for REE recycling in the EU?
Ali bo zamenjava redkih zemelj pomemben del novega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
Will REE substitution play an important role in the next research FP?
Kako namerava Komisija spodbujati podjetja EU , ki se ukvarjajo z redkimi zemljami , da se preusmerijo in začnejo izkoriščati druge vire v EU in na Grenlandiji?
How does the Commission plan to encourage EU REE companies to redevelop and exploit other sources within the EU and in Greenland?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi zagotovila, da bo ekstrakcija redkih zemelj v državah v razvoju potekala popolnoma pregledno in ob ustreznem posvetovanju z lokalnimi skupnostmi?
What action does the Commission plan to take to ensure that extraction of rare earths in developing countries is undertaken in a fully transparent manner and with due consultation of local communities?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000044/2011
Question for oral answer O-000044/2011
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Preprečevanje naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: Prevention of natural and man-made disasters
Komisija se je v svojem sporočilu s 23. februarja 2009 z naslovom Skupnostni pristop k preprečevanju naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek (KOM(2009)0082) obvezala, da bo:
In its communication of 23 February 2009 entitled ‘A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man made disasters’ (COM(2009)0082), the Commission undertook to:
– leta 2009 oblikovala pregled sedanjih instrumentov Skupnosti, ki lahko podpirajo ukrepe za preprečevanje nesreč, da bi ocenila stopnjo uporabe teh instrumentov ter določila pomanjkljivosti pri področju uporabe,
– establish, in 2009, an inventory of existing Community instruments capable of supporting disaster prevention activities, with the objective of assessing the degree of use of such instruments and identifying any gaps in their coverage;
– pripravila popis preventivnih ukrepov in države članice pozvala, naj ocenijo možnosti za boljše vključevanje preprečevanja nesreč v nacionalno operativno načrtovanje financiranja EU,
– develop a catalogue of prevention measures and invite the Member States to assess the possibility of improving the integration of disaster prevention in national operational programming of EU funding;
– oblikovala celovit seznam obstoječih virov informacij v zvezi z nesrečami,
– develop a comprehensive inventory of existing sources of information related to disasters;
– v državah članicah izvedla študijo o sedanjih praksah pri kartiranju območij nevarnosti in tveganj ter na tej osnovi razvila smernice za kartiranje teh območij, kjer bo poseben poudarek na nesrečah z morebitnim čezmejnim učinkom, izrednih dogodkih in velikih nesrečah.
– carry out a study on current practices of hazard and risk mapping in the Member States, and, on this basis, to develop Community guidelines for hazard and risk mapping, focusing on disasters with potential cross-border impacts, exceptional events and large-scale disasters.
Komisija je glede prvih dveh omenjenih točk v svojem odgovoru na vprašanje E-0424/10 povedala, da bo poročilo o šestmesečni študiji, ki se je pričela konec leta 2009, predvidoma končano konec junija 2010.
As regards the first two items listed above, the Commission stated in its answer to question E-0424/10 that the report of a six-month study launched at the end of 2009 was due to be completed by the end of June 2010.
Glede tretje točke je v odgovoru na vprašanje E-0425/10 povedala, da bodo predhodne ugotovitve o opravljenem delu vključene v poročilo za november 2010, ki ga bo objavila Evropska agencija za okolje.
As regards the third item, the Commission stated in its answer to question E-0425/10 that preliminary conclusions of the work carried out would be part of a November 2010 report to be published by the EEA.
Glede četrte točke je v odgovoru na vprašanje E-0423/10 povedala, da bo omenjene smernice razvila pred koncem leta 2010.
As regards the fourth item, the Commission stated in its answer to question E-0423/10 that it would develop the guidelines referred to before the end of 2010.
Ali Komisija lahko posreduje podatke o rezultatih doslej opravljenega dela na teh področjih?
Can the Commission provide information concerning the results of the work done so far in these areas?
Katere posebne ukrepe je Komisija uvedla ali jih namerava uvesti, da bi uresničila priporočila iz poročila o „Skupnostnem pristopu k preprečevanju naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek“, ki ga je Parlament sprejel septembra 2010?
What specific actions has it taken – or does it intend to take – to implement the recommendations set out in the report on ‘A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters’ approved by Parliament in September 2010?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000045/2011
Question for oral answer O-000045/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Vzpostavitev skupnega programa EU za ponovno naselitev beguncev
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Establishment of a joint EU resettlement programme for refugees
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve je na svoji seji 23. februarja 2010 podprl idejo o ambicioznem programu EU za ponovno naselitev in predstavil dva osnutka poročil: enega o sporočilu Evropske komisije o programu EU za ponovno naselitev, drugega o predlaganih spremembah pravil Evropskega sklada za begunce (ESB).
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, in its session of 23 February 2010, supported the idea of an ambitious EU resettlement programme and presented two draft reports: one on the Communication of the European Commission on the EU resettlement programme, and another on the proposed amendments to the European Refugee Fund (ERF).
Obe poročili sta bili s prepričljivo večino podprti maja 2010, o politični vsebini teh poročil pa je bil med Komisijo, Svetom in EP dosežen pravi konsenz.
Both reports were approved by a large majority in May 2010 and a real consensus was built between the Commission, the Council and the EP with regard to the political content of these reports.
Skoraj eno leto po glasovanju v Evropskem parlamentu in zaradi nedoločenega roka za dokončanje prve obravnave še vedno čakamo na sklep Sveta, da zaključi postopek soodločanja.
Almost one year after the EP vote, and as first reading does not have a deadline for completion, we are still waiting for the Council to conclude the codecision procedure.
Treba je vedeti, da smo izgubili eno leto finančne podpore novim državam gostiteljicam EU.
One should note that one year of financial support to the new EU host countries has already been lost.
Glede na sedanje razmere v Severni Afriki, kjer se nahajajo nekateri od begunskih taborišč, je bolj kot kdajkoli prej pomembno, da EU začne izvajati program za ponovno naselitev.
Given the current situation in North Africa where some of the refugee camps are located, it is more important than ever that the EU initiates the resettlement programme.
Ali namerava Svet zaključek tega postopka soodločanja uvrstiti na svoj seznam prednostnih nalog?
Therefore, does the Council intend to put the completion of the codecision procedure on the agenda of its priorities?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000046/2011
Question for oral answer O-000046/2011
Zadeva: Oživitev politične strategije Evropske unije v Sredozemlju
Subject: Revitalising the EU's political strategy in the Mediterranean region
V zadnjih mesecih je na italijanskih obalah pristalo skoraj šest tisoč oseb, tri tisoč samo v obdobju med 11. in 14. februarjem.
Nearly 6 000 people have landed on Italy’s coasts in recent months, 3 000 of them between 11 and 14 February.
Te številke zelo jasno kažejo, da smo soočeni z izjemnimi razmerami.
It is abundantly clear from these figures that we are facing a major emergency.
Ob upoštevanju obsega pojava, ki se bo zaostroval, je bolj kot kdajkoli prej nujno, da Evropa pripravi strategijo za pomoč državam, ki same ne bodo kos pretresom, kakršnim smo priča na področju Sredozemlja.
Given the extent of the problem, which is likely to become much worse still, it is more urgent than ever for Europe to develop a strategy to assist those countries that will never be able to cope with the impact of the upheavals taking place in the Mediterranean region on their own.
Glede tega je Evropska komisija že pokazala pripravljenost pomagati, Svet evropskih ministrov, ki se je sestal 24. februarja v sestavi notranjih ministrov, pa je Italiji dal na voljo 25 milijonov EUR za nujno reševanje problematike priseljevanja.
In this connection, the Commission has already signalled its willingness to help, and the Justice and Home Affairs Council, meeting on 24 February, has pledged EUR 25 million to help Italy deal with the immigration emergency.
Namen teh prvih ukrepov, ki gredo v pravo smer, je sicer reševanje izrednih humanitarnih razmer, pri tem pa ostaja nerešeno bistveno vprašanje, ki je povezano s pripravo nove evropske politične strategije za Sredozemlje.
While these initial measures – which are a step in the right direction – are designed to address the humanitarian emergency, the underlying issue of the need to develop a new EU political strategy for the Mediterranean region has yet to be resolved.