natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ob povedanem, kakšne ukrepe je sprejel Svet za enakomerno porazdelitev odgovornosti ob pričakovanem navalu priseljencev v države članice EU in za zagotovitev spoštovanja pravic beguncev in priseljencev?
In view of this, what measures has the Council taken with a view to spreading evenly responsibility for the anticipated wave of migrants into the EU Member States and ensuring that the rights of refugees and migrants are respected?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000168/2011
Question for Question Time H-000168/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Zunanja energetska politika
(PPE) Subject: Foreign policy in the field of energy
Kako Svet ocenjuje trenutno stanje prizadevanj za zunanjo energetsko politiko EU, predvsem kar zadeva večjo neodvisnost od ruske dobave plina in raznolikost virov oskrbe in tranzitnih poti?
What is the Council’s position on the current state of progress of EU foreign policy in the field of energy, in particular as regards greater independence from Russian supplies and the diversification of sources of supply and supply routes?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000169/2011
Question for Question Time H-000169/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Humanitarna pomoč za Libijo
(PPE) Subject: Humanitarian aid for Libya
Kakšno je stanje glede humanitarne pomoči Komisije protestnikom in nedolžnemu civilnemu prebivalstvu v Libiji in na drugih severnoafriških kriznih območjih?
What is the state of progress with regard to the Commission’s humanitarian aid for the rebels and innocent civilians in Libya and other crisis areas in North Africa?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje dejavnosti na tem področju v zadnjih mesecih?
What is the overall outcome of the Commission’s activities in this field in the past few months?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000170/2011
Question for Question Time H-000170/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Nujnost spremembe proračuna EU
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Need for changes to the EU budget
Izbruh krize leta 2008 je povzročil povečanje primanjkljaja in dolga držav članic EU na raven brez primere v preteklosti ter s tem večje stroške posojil in hude težave pri odplačevanju dolga.
The onset of the crisis in 2008 sent EU Member States' deficit and debt levels spiralling to unprecedented levels, thereby increasing the cost of credit and creating serious debt servicing difficulties.
Skoraj vse vlade držav članic EU so sprejele stroge programe varčevanja, da bi zmanjšali tako javno porabo kakor programe javnih naložb.
Nearly all EU Member State governments have adopted tough austerity programmes with a view to cutting both public spending and public investment programmes.
Učinek tega se je takoj občutil, izrazito so se zmanjšale socialne pravice, kar je povzročilo širjenje recesije.
The effect of this has made itself felt immediately, drastically undermining social benefits and causing the recession to spread.
Ob upoštevanju, da je proračun EU glavni instrument za rast in glede na dejstvo, da še ni bil bistveno prestrukturiran v odziv na nove spremembe, ki so posledica splošne gospodarske in dolžniške krize:
Given that the EU budget is potentially a major instrument for growth and given that it has not yet undergone substantial restructuring in response to the new developments resulting from the generalised economic and debt crisis:
Ali Komisija upošteva predloge za splošno prestrukturiranje proračuna EU, ki vključuje spremembe proračunskih smernic in sredstev, da bi pomagali državam članicam pri odzivanju na socialne posledice krize ter podprli njihova prizadevanja za spodbujanje rasti?
Is the Commission considering proposals for a general restructuring of the EU budget, involving modifications to budgetary guidelines and appropriations, with a view to helping the Member States respond to the social impact of the crisis and support their endeavours to stimulate growth?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000171/2011
Question for Question Time H-000171/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Časovni razpored za resolucijo o bančništvu in krizi dolžniških instrumentov
(PPE) Subject: Timeline for the resolution of the banking and debt crisis
Ali bo Svet objavil časovni razpored za resolucijo o bančništvu in krizi dolžniških instrumentov, ki jo doživljamo v Evropi?
Will the Council put forward a timeline for the resolution of the banking and debt crisis currently under way in Europe?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000172/2011
Question for Question Time H-000172/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Jedrska nesreča velikega obsega
(PPE) Subject: Large-scale nuclear catastrophe
Komisija je bila zelo uspešna pri usklajevanju pomoči EU na Japonskem po pogubnem potresu in cunamiju.
The Commission has been very successful in coordinating EU assistance in Japan following the devastating earthquake and tsunami.
Toda kako je Komisija pripravljena na možnost jedrske nesreče velikega obsega na Japonskem?
However, how is the Commission prepared for a potential large-scale nuclear catastrophe in Japan?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000173/2011
Question for Question Time H-000173/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Morebitno navzkrižje interesov glede aspartama
(S&D) Subject: Possible conflicts of interest concerning aspartame
Komisija je na moje vprašanje H-000072/2011 z dne 8. marca 2011 odgovorila, da do 31. decembra 2020 ne bo izvedla ponovne ocene aspartama.
In its answer to my question No H-000072/2011 of 8 March 2011, the Commission stated that it would not re-evaluate aspartame before 31 December 2020.
Ali lahko natančno navede, kakšno količino hrane ali zdravil moramo zaužiti, da dosežemo sprejemljiv dnevni vnos 40 mg/kg?
Could the Commission please indicate what quantity of food or medicines would need to be consumed to reach the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 40 mg/kg?
Ali ne bi morali podvomiti v izjavo, ki jo je 28. februarja 2011 dala Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA), ko se je izkazalo, da je imela strokovnjakinja v odboru za aditive pri tej agenciji, Dominique Parent-Massin, sklenjeno pogodbo z industrijskim podjetjem Coca-Cola, ki je velik potrošnik sladil, in podjetjem Ajinomoto, ki je največji svetovni proizvajalec aspartama?
Should the EFSA statement of 28 February 2011 not be called into question in light of the fact that Dominique Parent-Massin, an expert on the EFSA Panel on Food Additives, was under contract to Coca-Cola, a drinks company which is a major consumer of sweeteners, and Ajinomoto, the world’s largest producer of aspartame?
Kakšen je odziv Komisije na ugotovljeni novi primer navzkrižja interesov?
What is the Commission’s reaction to this latest conflict of interests?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000174/2011
Question for Question Time H-000174/2011
(ECR) Zadeva: Menjava ure
(ECR) Subject: Daylight Saving Time
Pred letom dni sem Komisijo vprašal o koristnosti prehoda s poletnega na zimski čas (vprašanje H-0103/2010 ).
A year ago, I asked the Commission about the usefulness of changing from summer time to winter time (Question H-0103/2010 ).
Zdaj pa bi rad vprašal, ali je njeno stališče še vedno enako?
I should now like to ask whether the Commission’s position is still the same as it was at the time.
Ali je Komisija seznanjena z najnovejšimi raziskavami na področju energije, ki odkrivajo, da prehod s poletnega na zimski čas in obratno ne vpliva na energetsko bilanco?
Is the Commission aware of the latest research in the energy field, which points to the changeover having no impact on the energy balance?
Se zaveda, da najnovejše medicinske raziskave celo kažejo, da ta prehod škoduje zdravju ljudi?
Is it aware that the latest medical research indicates that the changeover has an adverse effect on people's health?
Kaj meni o dejstvu, da se čedalje več držav odloča, da opustijo prakso menjave ure?
What view does it take of the fact that further countries have decided to abandon the practice of changing the clocks?
Ali zgoraj navedeni dejavniki ne zadostujejo, da Komisija svoje stališče spremeni in tako državljanom EU zagotovi bolj zdravo in varčno življenje?
Are the above factors not sufficient reason for the Commission to change its stance, thus making life healthier and more economical for EU citizens?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000175/2011
Question for Question Time H-000175/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Kriza fosfatnih gnojil
(PPE) Subject: Shortage of phosphate-based fertilizers
V nedavno objavljenem znanstvenem poročilu z naslovom Trajnostna globalna družba („A Sustainable Global Society“) je bilo opozorjeno, da bi lahko v naslednjih tridesetih letih izčrpali vire fosfatne rudnine, ki se uporablja za proizvodnjo glavnih gnojil za žito, riž in koruzo.
According to a recently published scientific report entitled ‘A Sustainable Global Society’, supplies of phosphate rock (which is used to produce the principal fertilizers for the cultivation of wheat, rice and maize) could be exhausted within the next 30 years.
Na kmetijskih zemljiščih v Avstraliji, ki je sedma največja proizvajalka žita, fosforja že čedalje bolj primanjkuje.
Australia, the world’s seventh largest wheat producer, is already facing difficulties as a result of markedly diminished phosphorus levels on farmland.
Poročilo tudi navaja, da je treba vlagati v raziskave novih virov fosfata in razvoj tehnologij za pridobivanja fosfata iz vode.
The report indicates that investment is necessary to prospect for new phosphate reserves and develop technologies for extracting phosphates from water.
Ali lahko Komisija odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
In view of this:
Ali so na voljo informacije o svetovnih rezervah fosfatne rudnine?
Is any information available regarding world phosphate rock supplies?
Kako so se v zadnjih letih razvijale cene fosfatnih gnojil?
What have been the price trends over the last few years for phosphate-based fertilizers prices?
Ali Komisija namerava podpreti raziskave na tem področju, da bi odkrili nove vire fosfata ali nadomestne izdelke?
Does the Commission intend to promote research in this area with a view to discovering new sources of this commodity or possible substitutes?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000176/2011
Question for Question Time H-000176/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Odprtje posebne številke 116000 za izginule otroke do 25. maja 2011
(ALDE) Subject: The establishment of the 116 000 hotline for missing children by 25 May 2011
Vse države članice morajo do 25. maja 2011odpreti posebno številko 116000 za izginule otroke.
Every Member State is obliged to make the 116 000 hotline for missing children operational by 25 May 2011.
Na tej številki bodo lahko po vsej Evropi poiskali pomoč tako otroci kot starši v stiski.
The hotline provides a single number for missing children and their parents to call for help anywhere in the EU.
Ker bo številka po vsej Evropski uniji ista, bodo otroci in starši v stiski lažje poiskali pomoč.
Having the same hotline everywhere in the EU makes it easier and faster for children and parents in trouble to get help.
Ker je bila prednostna naloga tega predsedstva, da varuje pravice državljanov ter zmanjša razkorak med institucijami in državljani Evropske unije, katere ukrepe je sprejel Svet, da bi državam članicam pomagal pripraviti to pomembno storitev do roka?
Since a priority of this Presidency has been the protection of citizens’ rights and closing the gap between the institutions and the citizens of the EU, what measures has the Council in place to help the Member States establish this important service before the deadline?
Ali namerava Svet dati politično prednost odprtju posebne številke?
Does the Council intend on giving policy priority to the establishment of the hotline?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000177/2011
Question for Question Time H-000177/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Kmetijstvo in emisije toplogrednih plinov
(ALDE) Subject: Agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions
Kmetijski sektor proizvede 13,5 % svetovnih emisij toplogrednih plinov.
The agriculture sector is responsible for 13.5% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions.
V EU znaša delež emisij kmetijstva 9 %.
In the EU the agriculture sector accounts for 9% of emissions.
Evropski in irski kmetje so dosegli znatni napredek pri izvajanju okolju prijaznejših ukrepov, s katerimi so zmanjšali emisije, ter so pašne površine in pašnike z deteljo uporabili kot ponore ogljikovega dioksida, kadar koli je bilo to mogoče.
European and Irish farmers have made significant progress in implementing greener measures, reducing emissions and in using pasture lands and clover pasture as carbon dioxide sinks wherever possible.
Ker evropski kmetijski sektor že zdaj deluje učinkovito in zanj že veljajo okoljska trajnost in politike ter ukrepi za ohranjanje, je v tem sektorju težko doseči kakršen koli dodatni napredek.
Since the European agriculture sector is already operating effectively and environmental sustainability and conservation policies and measures are already in place, it would be very difficult for this sector to make any further progress.
S katerimi ukrepi bi lahko Komisija glede na to, da lahko ta sektor doseže samo omejen napredek na področju zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov, pomagala kmetom, da bi še dodatno zmanjšali tovrstne emisije, in zagotovila, da sektorja ne bi kaznovali pri uresničevanju ambicioznih ciljev EU?
Since this sector can make only limited progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, what can the Commission do to help farmers reduce greenhouse gas emissions further and to ensure that the sector isn’t penalised in pursuit of the EU’s ambitious objectives.
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000178/2011
Question for Question Time H-000178/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Jedrska varnost v Evropi
(PPE) Subject: Nuclear safety in Europe
Po jedrski nesreči v Fukušimi na Japonskem so se države članice EU 25. marca 2011 strinjale, da je treba za jedrske elektrarne v EU izvesti teste izjemnih situacij, in pozvale k podobnim ukrepom povsod po svetu.
Following the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan, EU Member States jointly agreed on 25 March 2011 on the need to conduct stress tests on nuclear power plants in the EU and called for a similar move worldwide.
Ali ima Svet kakšne informacije o tem, ali bodo podobni ukrepi sprejeti za že delujoče elektrarne (zlasti tiste, ki obratujejo že več kot 20 let) v drugih evropskih državah, ki niso članice EU?
Does the Council possess information on whether similar measures will be taken with regard to the plants already operating (especially those in operation for more than 20 years) in other European countries that are not members of the EU?
Ali ima Svet v zvezi z novimi jedrskimi elektrarnami v sosednjih državah EU načrt, kako zagotoviti, da bodo te nove elektrarne izpolnjevale potrebne okoljske standarde in ne bodo kršile mednarodno priznanih konvencij, na primer Konvencije iz Espooja o presoji vplivov na okolje?
As regards new nuclear power plants in EU neighbouring states, does the Council have a plan on how to ensure that these new plants meet the necessary environmental standards and do not violate internationally recognised conventions, such as the Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000179/2011
Question for Question Time H-000179/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Pomoč Japonski
(PPE) Subject: Relief assistance to Japan
Evropska unija se je po potresu in cunamiju marca letos na Japonskem pridružila mednarodni skupnosti v prizadevanjih, da se zagotovi človekoljubno pomoč prizadetim območjem in njihovemu prebivalstvu, ki trpi zaradi posledic nesreče.
Following the earthquake and the tsunami in Japan in March this year, the EU joined the international community in efforts to provide humanitarian relief assistance to the devastated regions and their suffering populations.
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi jasno razčlenitev pomoči, ki jo je do zdaj Evropska unija namenila Japonski, vključno s pomočjo, ki jo upravljajo Komisija in različne države članice, ter navede, kakšni ukrepi so še predvideni v bližnji prihodnosti?
Could the Commission provide a clear breakdown of all the aid that the EU has provided to Japan so far, including aid administered by the Commission and the different Member States, and what measures are still being considered for the very near future?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000180/2011
Question for Question Time H-000180/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Kontrola živil, uvoženih iz Japonske
(PPE) Subject: Checks on foodstuffs imported from Japan
Komisija je po jedrski nesreči v jedrski elektrarni Fukušima z Uredbo (EU) št. 297/2011 z dne 25. marca 2011 določila posebne pogoje za uvoz živil in krmil iz Japonske.
Following the nuclear accident at the Fukushima plant, by means of its Regulation (EU) No 297/2011 of 25 March 2011 the Commission has laid down special conditions governing the import of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs from Japan.
Eden od uvedenih ukrepov določa stroge in sistematične preglede za izdelke s poreklom iz Japonske.
One of the new measures introduced provides for the performance of stringent, systematic checks on products imported from Japan.
Poleg tega je bila na podlagi odločitve, ki sta jo sprejela Komisija in Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali (sklep tega odbora z dne 8. aprila 2011), znižana najvišja dovoljena raven radioaktivne kontaminacije v živilih.
In addition, on the basis of a decision taken by the Commission and the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health (Standing Committee decision of 8 April 2011), the maximum permissible levels of radioactive contamination in foodstuffs have been lowered.
Ali je treba na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 297/2011 s trga EU umakniti vsa živila s poreklom iz Japonske?
Does Regulation (EU) No 297/2011 require all foodstuffs from Japan to be removed from the EU market?
Ali so države članice že predložile obvestila na podlagi sistema hitrega obveščanja v zvezi s proizvodi z izredno visoko stopnjo radioaktivne onesnaženosti?
Have Member States already submitted notifications under the Rapid Alert System concerning products showing an excessively high level of radioactive contamination?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000181/2011
Question for Question Time H-000181/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Jamstveni svežnji za podporo grškemu finančnemu sistemu in realnemu gospodarstvu
(PPE) Subject: Guarantee packages to underpin the Greek financial system and real economy
Leta 2008 je grška vlada sprejela sveženj podpore za grški finančni sistem, ki ga je sestavljalo za 5 milijard EUR prednostnih delnic, 15 milijard EUR jamstev in 8 milijard EUR državnih obveznic.
In 2008, the Greek Government announced a support package for the Greek financial system consisting of a €5 billion preferred share issue, a €15 billion guarantee package and a €8 billion government bond issue.
Nato sta bila v letu 2010 zagotovljena še jamstvena svežnja v vrednosti 15 milijard EUR oziroma 25 milijard EUR.
Subsequently, in 2010, guarantee packages of €15 billion and €25 billion were provided.
Po odobritvi Komisije si grška vlada zdaj prizadeva za sprejetje novega jamstvenega svežnja v vrednosti 30 milijard EUR.
Following the approval of the Commission, the Greek Government is now seeking the adoption of a further €30 billion guarantee package.
Glede na to bi rada vprašala:
In view of this:
Kako Komisija ocenjuje dosedanje delovanje sklada za finančno stabilnost, ki so ga v okviru mehanizma finančne pomoči ustanovile države članice evroobmočja, da bi stabilizirale grški bančni sistem?
What is the Commission’s assessment to date of the functioning of the Financial Stability Fund (FSF) set up under the Greek economic support mechanism by the euro zone Member States and IMF with a view to stabilising the Greek banking system?
Kako ocenjuje prispevek tega sklada k utrjevanju kapitalske ustreznosti kreditnih institucij, h kateri se je zavezala grška država?
How does it assess its contribution to consolidating the capital adequacy of credit institutions underwritten by the Greek State?
Ali ima na voljo podatke o obsegu, v katerem so bila grška vladna jamstva pretočena v realno gospodarstvo?
Does it have information concerning the extent to which Greek Government guarantees have been channelled in to the real economy?
Ali so bili zastavljeni cilji glede minimalnega odstotka jamstva, ki se nameni za rast kreditov v grškem gospodarstvu?
Have targets been set regarding the minimum percentage of guarantees to be earmarked for credit growth within the Greek economy?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000182/2011
Question for Question Time H-000182/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Vojaška operacija v Libiji
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Military operation in Libya
Svet je 1. aprila 2011 sprejel odločitev o vojaški operaciji Evropske unije „EUFOR Libija“ za podporo dejavnostim humanitarne pomoči; za poveljnika operacije EU je imenoval kontraadmirala Claudia Gaudiosija, operativni štab pa je postavil v Rim.
On 1 April 2011, the Council decided on the ‘EUFOR Libya’ European Union military operation in support of humanitarian assistance operations, appointing Rear Admiral Claudio Gaudiosi as EU operation commander and locating the operational headquarters in Rome.
Svet je na srečanju 12. aprila 2011 potrdil svojo odločitev z dne 1. aprila 2011 ter kontraadmiralu Gaudiosiju naročil, naj pripravi operacijski načrt za takojšnje posredovanje v tesnem sodelovanju z Natom, ter izrazil pripravljenost, da v misijo vključi oborožene sile iz tretjih držav na tem območju.
At its meeting of 12 April 2011, the Council confirmed its decision of 1 April 2011, instructing Rear Admiral Gaudiosi to draw up an operational plan for immediate intervention in close cooperation with NATO and indicating its willingness to include in the mission armed forces from third countries situated in the area.
V drugi polovici leta 2011 (od 1. julija do 31. decembra) bosta dve bojni skupini EU v pripravljenosti na posredovanje, to se pravi EUFOR in balkanska bojna skupina HELBROC – slednjo sestavljajo oborožene sile Grčije, Bolgarije, Romunije in Cipra pod grškim poveljstvom in z operativnim štabom v Grčiji.
In the second half of 2011 (1 July to 31 December 2011), two EU battle groups will be in a state of preparedness for intervention, that is to say the EUFOR and the Balkans ‘HELBROC’ battle groups, the latter made up of armed forces from Greece, Bulgaria, Romania and Cyprus under Greek command with their operational headquarters in Greece.
Ali Svet predvideva posredovanje kopenskih sil v Libiji?
Is the Council envisaging the intervention of ground forces in Libya?
Kakšna bo vloga balkanske bojne skupine HELBROC pod grškim vodstvom v vojaški operaciji „EUFOR Libija“?
What will be the role of the Greek-led Balkans battle group (‘HELBROC’) in the ‘EUFOR Libya’ military intervention?
Katere tretje države s tega območja bodo sodelovale v napovedani operaciji?
Which third countries from the area will be participating in this operation?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000183/2011
Question for Question Time H-000183/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Pretirano visoke cestnine
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Exorbitant motorway tolls
Podjetje Olympia Odos, ki upravlja z avtocesto Elefsina-Korint-Patras-Pyrgos-Tsakona, je oznanilo, da namerava pravno ukrepati proti tistim, ki si prizadevajo za odpravo pretirano visokih cestnin, ki jih podjetje zaračunava celo pred zaključkom del, obenem pa grozi z ukinitvijo več tisoč delovnih mest.
The ‘Olympia Odos’ Company, which is operating the Elefsina-Corinth-Patras-Pyrgos-Tsakona motorway, has announced its intention of taking legal action against those seeking to end the exorbitant tolls charged by the company even prior to completion of the works while at the same time threatening thousands of job losses.
Grška vlada je z zakonom prepovedala zavrnitev plačila cestnine in s tem še povečala dobiček podjetja, poleg tega pa je prepovedala tudi organizacijo upravičenih protestov in druge pobude tistih, ki cestninam nasprotujejo.
Furthermore, the Greek Government has outlawed refusal to pay the tolls and thereby swell company profits, as well as the organisation of justified protests and other initiatives by those opposed to the tolls.