natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nekompatibilnost polnilcev za mobilne telefone potrošnikom povzroča številne preglavice in stroške.
The incompatibility of chargers for mobile phones causes major inconvenience and expense for consumers.
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi informacije o dosedanjem napredku pri določitvi evropskih standardov za skupni polnilec za mobilne telefone s podatkovno zmogljivostjo, kot je določeno v sporazumu iz junija 2009?
Can the Commission provide information on the progress to date on establishing European standards for a common charger for data-enabled mobile phones, as set down in the agreement announced in June 2009?
Kdaj bodo po mnenju komisarja potrošnikom v EU na voljo kompatibilni polnilci za mobilne telefone?
In the Commissioner’s view, when are EU consumers likely to have compatible mobile phone chargers available to them?
Ali Komisija predvideva, da bodo ti standardi za skupni polnilec razširjeni na druge izdelovalce in znamke mobilnih telefonov?
Does the Commission foresee these standards for a common charger being extended to include other makers and brands of mobile phones?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000035/2011
Question for Question Time H-000035/2011
(ECR) Zadeva: Vloga recikliranja v politiki sektorja surovin
(ECR) Subject: Recycling's role in raw-materials policy
V okviru priprav na določitev načel evropske politike za sektor surovin morajo evropske institucije sprejeti strateške odločitve v zvezi z vlogo recikliranja v politiki sektorja surovin.
In connection with the preparations for laying down the principles underpinning an EU raw-materials policy, the institutions have a strategic choice to make regarding the role that recycling is to play in that policy.
Kakšne so možnosti recikliranja pri pridobivanju posameznih vrst surovin, ki so strateškega pomena za razvoj evropskega gospodarstva?
What potential does recycling have as regards the sourcing of the various categories of raw materials that are of strategic importance to economic development in the EU?
Kolikšen bi lahko bil delež recikliranja (ang. urban mining) v primerjavi z domačimi viri in uvoženimi surovinami?
What percentage contribution could recycling (urban mining) make, as compared with indigenous resources and imported raw materials?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000036/2011
Question for Question Time H-000036/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Pridružitveni sporazum z Marokom
(PPE) Subject: Association Agreement with Morocco
Pravna služba Evropskega parlamenta navaja, da nima zadostnih informacij za opredelitev, ali pridružitveni sporazum z Marokom velja za območje Zahodne Sahare ter ali prinaša koristi lokalnemu saharskemu prebivalstvu.
Parliament’s Legal Service has said that it does not have enough information to establish whether the Association Agreement with Morocco applies to the region of Western Sahara, or whether local Sahrawi people benefit from it.
Novo kmetijsko poglavje sporazuma mora koristiti družbeno-gospodarskemu razvoju prebivalstva Sahare.
The new agricultural chapter of the Agreement should help foster socio-economic development among the Sahrawi people.
Pravna služba zato meni, da mora Komisija ta vprašanja razjasniti, preden Evropski parlament sprejme svoje mnenje, saj bi v primeru, da sporazum krši mednarodno pravo, Evropska unija prispevala k tem razmeram.
The Legal Service nevertheless takes the view that these issues require clarification from the Commission before Parliament adopts its opinion, because if the Agreement were to constitute a breach of international law, the European Union would be contributing to that situation.
Ali lahko Komisija odgovori na vprašanja Pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta?
Can the Commission respond to the queries raised by Parliament’s Legal Service?
Kakšno je mnenje Pravne službe Komisije glede tega?
What view does the Commission’s Legal Service take on the matter?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000037/2011
Question for Question Time H-000037/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Vpliv sistema trgovanja z emisijami (ETS III) na evropske proizvajalce dušikovih gnojil
(PPE) Subject: Impact of ETS III on European nitrogen fertiliser manufacturers
Sistem trgovanja z emisijami (ETS III) določa, da bodo energetsko intenzivne proizvodne dejavnosti od leta 2013 pod okriljem sistema omejevanja in trgovanja (cap and trade).
ETS III will bring energy-intensive manufacturing industries under the umbrella of Europe’s cap and trade system from 2013.
Ali se Svet zaveda resnih pomislekov v evropski industriji gnojil ter študij, ki ugotavljajo, da bi bili pričakovani dodatni stroški zaradi direktive o trgovanju z emisijami tudi po najugodnejšem scenariju tako visoki, da z nobenim zvišanjem produktivnosti ne bi bilo mogoče pokriti izgub?
Is the Council aware of the serious concerns of the European fertiliser manufacturing industry and studies that conclude the probable extra cost due to the Emissions Trading Directive, even in the mildest scenario, would be so high that there would be no possibilities to cover the losses by in creasing productivity ?
Glede na stanje na svetovnem trgu proizvajalci gnojil v EU ne morejo prenesti višjih stroškov na potrošnike.
Given the global market situation, fertiliser manufacturers in the EU are not able to pass increasing costs further to final consumers.
Ali je Svet zaskrbljen zaradi morebitnega propada industrije gnojil v Evropski uniji?
Is the Council concerned about the possible demise of the fertiliser manufacturing industry within the European Union?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000038/2011
Question for Question Time H-000038/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Pritožba Komisiji proti državi članici
(PPE) Subject: Making a complaint with the Commission against a Member State
Ali lahko Komisija posreduje izčrpno informacijo o svojem postopku obravnave pritožb in nazorno pojasni svoja merila za določitev prednostne obravnave pritožbe?
Can the Commission provide comprehensive information about its complaint handling process, explaining clearly its criteria for deciding the priority of a complaint?
Ali po mnenju Komisije sedanja pravila za odnose s tožniki glede kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti izkazujejo in upoštevajo najboljšo prakso?
Does the Commission consider its current rules for relations with the complainant in respect of infringements of Community law demonstrate and follow best practice?
Ali bi Komisija svoj postopek opisala kot jasno opredeljen, ki v enaki meri upošteva tožnika in obtoženega in ki je vedno odprt, transparenten in ga je enostavno spremljati?
Would it describe its process as being: clearly defined; fairly weighted between the complainant and the respondent; always open and transparent and easy-to-follow?
Ali je pravilno, si samo prizadevati za sprejem odločitve glede določene zadeve (bodisi sprožiti postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev bodisi zaključiti primer) v dvanajstih mesecih od prejema pritožbe v generalnem sekretariatu?
Is it right to merely ‘endeavour to take a decision on the substance (either to open infringement proceedings or to close the case) within twelve months of registration of the complaint with its Secretariat-General’?
Ali upravna jamstva kar koli jamčijo?
Are the ‘Administrative Guarantees’ a guarantee of anything?
Ali Komisija lahko potrdi, da so podrobne informacije, vključno z zagotovljenimi časovnimi razporedi vseh faz postopka obravnave pritožbe, na voljo državljanom in kje?
Can the Commission confirm if and where citizens can find detailed information including guaranteed timetables for all stages in the complaint process?
Kaj je po mnenju Komisije potrebno storiti za pospešitev postopka in sprejemanje hitrejših odločitev?
What does the Commission believe should be done to speed the process and deliver more timely conclusions?
Ali Komisija s tem v zvezi predlaga določene ukrepe?
Does the Commission propose to act in this regard?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000039/2011
Question for Question Time H-000039/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Brezposelnost mladih
(ALDE) Subject: Youth unemployment
Katere pobude za izboljšanje zaposlitvenih možnosti za mlade v Evropski uniji bo uvedlo predsedstvo?
What initiatives will the Presidency introduce to improve job opportunities for young people in the European Union?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000040/2011
Question for Question Time H-000040/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Odpravljanje odvečne birokracije
(ALDE) Subject: Cutting red tape
Predsednik Komisije Jose Manuel Barosso je septembra 2010 v svojem poročilu o stanju v Uniji v zvezi z birokracijo omenil, da je Komisija predložila predloge, na podlagi katerih bi evropska podjetja letno prihranila 38 milijard EUR.
Commission President Barroso stated in his ‘State of the Union’ address in September 2010, in relation to red tape, that the Commission had put proposals on the table to generate annual savings of € 38 billion for European companies.
Ali lahko Komisija navede, katere konkretne ukrepe je doslej sprejela za zmanjšanje birokracije za podjetja s sedežem v Evropi?
Can the Commission outline what concrete actions it has taken to date so as to reduce the levels of red tape affecting companies based in Europe?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000041/2011
Question for Question Time H-000041/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Konkurenčnost evropskega gospodarstva
(ALDE) Subject: The competitiveness of the European economy
Katere pobude bo uvedlo predsedstvo za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti evropskega gospodarstva?
What initiatives will the Presidency introduce to improve the competitiveness of the European economy?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000042/2011
Question for Question Time H-000042/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Mala in srednja podjetja
(ALDE) Subject: Small to medium-sized enterprises
Ali Komisija lahko navede, kateri ukrepi obstajajo za podporo malim in srednjim podjetjem, ki delujejo v Evropi in ki želijo izvažati in vlagati v razvijajoča se gospodarstva kot je Kitajska?
Can the Commission outline what measures are in place to help small to medium-sized companies based in Europe who wish to export and invest in developing economies such as China?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000043/2011
Question for Question Time H-000043/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Enaki konkurenčni pogoji med malimi in srednjimi podjetji v čezmejnih regijah
(PPE) Subject: Balanced competition between SMEs in cross-border regions
Ob upoštevanju vpliva odprave notranjih meja enotnega trga, zlasti v regijah, ki se nahajajo v bližini teh meja, kot tudi neenakih pogojev med podjetji, ki imajo svoj sedež v različnih državah članicah, glede stroškov dela, surovin in fiskalnih politik, kar povzroča pomembna nihanja cen za enak proizvod ali storitev v različnih državah članicah, se zastavlja vprašanje, kateri so bistveni pogoji za konkurenčnost med podjetji, ki se nahajajo ob notranjih mejah enotnega trga?
Bearing in mind the impact of the abolition of internal borders in the single market, particularly in regions situated on those borders, as well as the imbalances that exist between undertakings based in different Member States in terms of labour costs, raw materials and tax policies, which create significant variations in prices for the same product or service in different Member States, what is the situation as regards the competitiveness of undertakings located on the internal borders of the single market?
Na kakšen način bo mogoče v okviru Akta za mala podjetja podpreti mala in srednja podjetja v čezmejnih regijah, ki so soočena z neenakimi konkurenčnimi pogoji, in na kakšen način se lahko kar najbolje izkoristi priložnosti, ponujene na področju razvoja in inovacij, da pri tem ne bi ogrozili krepitve enotnega trga in konkurenčnih pogojev?
What support can be provided, within the framework of the Small Business Act, for small and medium-sized undertakings in cross-border regions affected by imbalanced conditions, and what can be done to realise their potential for development and innovation without undermining action to strengthen the single market and conditions of competition?
Katere so najpomembnejše pobude Komisije, namenjene za boljšo prilagoditev enotnega trga na trenutne potrebe malih in srednjih podjetij v čezmejnih regijah, da bi lahko te izboljšale svojo uspešnost ter imele povečane in uravnotežene koristi?
What wider initiatives is the Commission taking or will it take to ensure that the single market is better adjusted to the current needs of SMEs in cross-border regions, thereby enabling them to achieve better results and reap greater, more balanced benefits?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000044/2011/rev.1
Question for Question Time H-000044/2011/rev.1
(S&D) Zadeva: Prednostne naloge madžarskega predsedovanja na energetskem področju
(S&D) Subject: Priorities of the Hungarian Presidency in the field of energy
Sodeč po prednostnih nalogah na področju energetike iz programa madžarskega predsedovanja bo eden od najpomembnejših korakov določanje prednostnih nalog zunanjega sodelovanja EU z namenom doseganja ciljev energetske politike EU.
The priorities in the field of energy stated in the programme of the Hungarian Presidency indicate that one of the most important points will be deciding the priorities for the EU’s external cooperation with a view to attaining the EU’s energy policy objectives.
Ali Svet meni, da je treba opustiti možnost sklepanja dvostranskih sporazumov z zunanjimi dobavitelji, da bi tako zagotovili, da bo EU pri pogajanjih o pogojih nabave energije in o višini plačila nastopila enotno?
What view does the Council take of the possibility of denouncing the bilateral agreements with external energy suppliers in order to guarantee that the EU negotiates unanimously on the conditions and pricing of energy purchases?
Kaj meni Svet o predlogu predsednika Evropskega parlamenta Jerzyja Buzeka, da bi na ravni Evropske unije vzpostavili skupino za nakup energije?
What view does the Council take of the proposal by the President of the European Parliament, Mr Buzek, that an EU energy purchasing group should be set up?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000045/2011
Question for Question Time H-000045/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Odziv Evropske unije na dogodke v Egiptu
(PPE) Subject: European Union response to the events in Egypt
Po nedavnih nasilnih političnih dogodkih v Tuniziji in dramatičnih dogodkih, ki se ravno odvijajo v Egiptu – obe državi sta zelo pomembni za Evropsko unijo in sta celo vključeni v evropsko sosedsko politiko – bi bilo najmanj, kar bi lahko pričakoval vsak Evropejec, da se bo Evropa odzvala odločno in enotno, zlasti ker je v veljavi Lizbonska pogodba, ki je Evropski uniji dala institucionalne temelje za enoten in močan nastop na mednarodnem prizorišču.
After the recent violent political events in Tunisia and the dramatic events unfolding at present in Egypt, in countries which are of great importance to the European Union and have even joined the European neighbourhood policy, the least that any European citizen would expect – particularly after entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, which has given the EU the necessary institutional basis for speaking with one voice and with force on the international scene – would be a strong and integrated European response.
V nasprotju s pričakovanji pa je visoka predstavnica za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko le pozno sprejela splošno stališče z nenatančnimi cilji.
Yet the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has at a late stage adopted a general position that is vague in its objective.
Štiriindvajset ur kasneje so tri države članice (Nemčija, Francija in Združeno kraljestvo) sprejele podrobnejše in natančnejše skupno mnenje.
Twenty-four hours later three Member States – Germany, France and the UK – have adopted a more detailed and precise joint position.
Povedati je treba, da je do sprejetja tega mnenja prišlo samo dan po zasedanju sveta ministrov za zunanje zadeve Evropske unije.
It should be noted that this position was taken barely a day before the meeting of the Council of EU Foreign Ministers.
Menim, da je verodostojnost Evropske unije na mednarodnem prizorišču zaradi dosedanjega tovrstnega odzivanja na te dogodke prej omajana kot izboljšana, zlasti v tej regiji, ki je neposredno povezana z evropskimi interesi.
I think that the way in which the European Union has responded to these serious events so far is weakening its impact on the international scene instead of bolstering it, particularly in a region that is of immediate European interest.
Ali je Svet zadovoljen z večglasnimi in neusklajenimi odzivi Evropske unije?
Is the Council satisfied with the many-voiced and inadequately coordinated response of the European Union?
Če ni tako, kako namerava ukrepati in katere ukrepe s takojšnjim učinkom namerava sprejeti, da bi preprečil ponavljanje tovrstnih nesprejemljivih dogodkov, ki spodkopavajo in resno ogrožajo vlogo Evropske unije na mednarodnem prizorišču?
If not, what decisions will it be taking and what steps delivering immediate results does it intend to take to ensure that unacceptable events of this kind are not repeated, which weaken and seriously undermine the European Union’s role at international level?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000046/2011
Question for Question Time H-000046/2011
Ali je Komisija zadovoljna z večglasnimi in neusklajenimi odzivi Evropske unije?
Is the Commission satisfied with the many-voiced and inadequately coordinated response of the European Union?
Če ni tako, kako namerava ukrepati in katere ukrepe s takojšnjim učinkom namerava sprejeti, da bi preprečila ponavljanje tovrstnih nesprejemljivih dogodkov, ki spodkopavajo in resno ogrožajo vlogo Evropske unije na mednarodnem prizorišču?
If not, what decisions will it be taking and what steps delivering immediate results does it intend to take to ensure that unacceptable events of this kind are not repeated, which weaken and seriously undermine the European Union’s role at international level?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000047/2011
Question for Question Time H-000047/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Dostop Evropskega parlamenta do dokumentov Sveta
(ALDE) Subject: European Parliament access to Council documents
Parlament je bil nedavno naprošen za mnenje o osnutku sklepa Sveta o polni uporabi določb schengenskega pravnega reda v Bolgariji in Romuniji.
Parliament was recently asked to give its opinion on the Council draft decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Bulgaria and Romania.
Vendar kot že v preteklosti Parlament nima dostopa do nekaterih dokumentov Sveta, ki so bistveni za oblikovanje tovrstnega mnenja.
However, as has been the case in the past, Parliament does not have access to certain Council documents essential to producing this opinion.
Ali se glede na to, da je komisar Maroš Šefčovič v preteklosti že poudaril, da je treba v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo okrepiti Evropski parlament, in da je med drugim pristojen za zagotavljanje učinkovitega sodelovanja med evropskimi institucijami, Komisija ne strinja, da takšno pomanjkanje dostopa do dokumentov škoduje medinstitucionalnim odnosom in je v nasprotju s samim smislom Lizbonske pogodbe, ki zahteva lojalno sodelovanje med Svetom in Parlamentom?
Given that Commissioner Šefčovič has previously stressed the need to strengthen the European Parliament in line with the Lisbon Treaty and given that his mandate includes ensuring that the European institutions can work together effectively, does the Commission not agree that such lack of access to documents damages interinstitutional relations and that it goes against the very spirit of the Lisbon Treaty, which demands loyal cooperation between the Council and Parliament?
Kakšna je po mnenju Komisije njena vloga pri iskanju rešitve na to ponavljajoče se vprašanje?
What does the Commission feel its role is in finding a solution to this recurring issue?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000048/2011
Question for Question Time H-000048/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Politike za spodbujanje inovacij v novi skupni kmetijski politiki
(PPE) Subject: Innovation policies and the new CAP
Sporočilo o skupni kmetijski politiki, ki ga je predstavil komisar Cioloş novembra lani (IP/10/1527), navaja inovacije kot bistveni element za izvajanje politik v okviru drugega stebra skupne kmetijske politike za obdobje po letu 2013.
The Communication on the CAP, presented by Commissioner Cioloş in November 2010 (IP/10/1527), mentions innovation as a vital component in policies implemented under the second pillar of the common agricultural policy (CAP) post 2013.
Ali meni, da je možno izvajanje politik za spodbujanje inovacij, ki so v sinergiji s potrebami kmetijskega sektorja in razvoja podeželja?
Does the Commission view the implementation of innovation policies that are in synergy with the demands of the agriculture and rural development sector as being possible?
Kateri bi lahko bili predvideni ukrepi?
What lines of action might be envisaged?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000049/2011
Question for Question Time H-000049/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Prihodnost ozemeljskega sodelovanja in sklepi petega poročila o koheziji - Omejitev 150 km za čezmejno sodelovanje v otoških regijah
(S&D) Subject: The future of territorial cooperation and the conclusions of the Fifth Cohesion report - the 150 km limit for cross-border cooperation in island regions
V regionalni politiki so regije z morskimi mejami, ki so na splošno ločene za največ 150 km, primerne za čezmejno sodelovanje, pri čemer se predvidijo prilagoditve, ki jamčijo skladnost in neprekinjenost sodelovanja.
Under the EU’s regional policy, areas with maritime borders that are no more than 150 km apart are eligible for cross-border cooperation, with adjustments being made to ensure the coherence and continuity of the cooperation.
Kljub prilagodljivosti, pa se nekatere otoške regije z mejami, ki presegajo omejitev 150 km, ne zdijo primerne za sodelovanje.
Despite this flexibility, however, some island regions, with borders that are further than 150 km apart, are not deemed eligible.
Ali glede na to in v skladu s sklepi petega poročila o koheziji, ki podpirajo nadaljevanje revidiranega ozemeljskega sodelovanja, Komisija namerava umakniti samovoljno omejitev 150 km, kadar to negativno vpliva na otoške regije, kakor je zahteval Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 22. septembra 2010 o evropski strategiji za gospodarski in družbeni razvoj gorskih regij, otokov in redko poseljenih območij ( P7_TA(2010)0341 )?
With this in mind, and in the light of the conclusions of the Fifth Cohesion Report, which support the continuation of revised territorial cooperation, is the Commission considering withdrawing the arbitrary 150 km limit in the case of island regions, as Parliament requested in its resolution of 22 September 2010 on the European strategy for the economic and social development of mountain regions, islands and sparsely populated areas ( P7_TA(2010)0341 )?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000050/2011
Question for Question Time H-000050/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Trgovinski sporazum med EU in Kanado
(PPE) Subject: EU-Canada trade agreement
Dostop do kmetijskih trgov in liberalizacija trgovine z ribiškimi proizvodi imata osrednje mesto v pogajanjih o splošnem trgovinskem sporazumu s Kanado.
Access to agricultural markets and the liberalisation of trade in fisheries products are a key focus of the negotiations on a comprehensive trade agreement with Canada.
Ali Komisija lahko navede, če je bila pred kratkim izvedena posebna študija o posledicah morebitnega sporazuma za različne kmetijske in agroživilske trge Unije?
Can the Commission say whether a specific impact assessment has recently been carried out as regards the effects of such an agreement on the Union’s various agricultural and agri-foodstuffs industries?
Ali lahko poroča, na kakšni točki se nahajajo pogajanja, ter natančno navede, kaj namerava ponuditi na kmetijskem področju?
Can it give an update on the progress of the negotiations, and provide details of the offers it intends to make in respect of agriculture?