natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poroča pa se tudi, da so okrog 7000 Tunizijcev prispelo na obalo Lampeduse.
However, some 7 000 Tunisians are also reported to have arrived on the shores of Lampedusa.
Ali lahko, glede na to, da ta gibanja povzročajo pritisk na solidarnost tako do sosednjih držav kakor v Evropski uniji, Svet pojasni:
Given that these movements put solidarity under pressure, both towards neighbouring countries and within the EU, we would like to ask the following questions:
– Kako namerava Svet pomagati državam v regiji pri obvladovanju razmer in podpreti tiste, ki ne morejo zapustiti regije in bi lahko zahtevali mednarodno pomoč?
– What does the Council plan to do in order to help the countries of the region to manage the situation and support those who are stuck in the region and who might require international protection?
– Glede na kritično položaj migrantov na Lampedusi in območju reke Evros, kaj namerava Svet storiti, da bosta Italija in Grčija začeli izvajati direktivo o začasni zaščiti iz leta 2001 in direktivo o sprejemu iz leta 2003?
– Given the critical situation of migrants in Lampedusa and Evros, what does the Council intend to do in order to make Italy and Greece enforce the 2001 Temporary Protection Directive and the 2003 Reception Directive?
– Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti ustrezno zaščito mladoletnikov brez spremstva, o katerih se poroča, da so prispeli na Lampeduso, glede na izjemno ranljiv položaj te skupine?
– Given the particularly vulnerable situation of unaccompanied minors reported to have arrived in Lampedusa, what does the Council intend to do to ensure the adequate protection of this group?
– Kaj namerava Svet storiti glede premestitve beguncev v EU in znotraj različnih držav članic, sploh kar zadeva prosilce, ki zahtevajo mednarodno zaščito?
– What does the Council intend to do regarding the relocation of refugees in the EU and between the Member States, particularly regarding applicants who require international protection?
– Kako namerava Svet vzpostaviti učinkovitejše solidarnostne mehanizme med državami članicami, da bi omogočili ponovno naselitev migrantov, ki prihajajo v območje Sredozemlja?
– What does the Council intend to do to establish more systematic solidarity mechanisms among Member States in order to resettle migrants arriving in the Mediterranean region?
– Kako namerava Svet dolgoročno zagotoviti, da se skupni azilni sistem EU vzpostavi do leta 2012?
– In the longer term, what does the Council intend to do to ensure that the EU common asylum system becomes a reality by 2012?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000086/2011
Question for oral answer O-000086/2011
Ali lahko, glede na to, da ta gibanja povzročajo pritisk na solidarnost tako do sosednjih držav kakor v Evropski uniji, Komisija pojasni:
Given that these movements put solidarity under pressure, both towards neighbouring countries and within the EU, we would like to ask the following questions:
– Kako namerava Komisija pomagati državam v regiji pri obvladovanju razmer in podpreti tiste, ki ne morejo zapustiti regije in bi lahko zahtevali mednarodno pomoč?
– What does the Commission plan to do in order to help the countries of the region to manage the situation and support those who are stuck in the region and who might require international protection?
– Glede na kritično položaj migrantov na Lampedusi in območju reke Evros, kaj namerava Komisija storiti, da bosta Italija in Grčija začeli izvajati direktivo o začasni zaščiti iz leta 2001 in direktivo o sprejemu iz leta 2003?
– Given the critical situation of migrants in Lampedusa and Evros, what does the Commission intend to do in order to make Italy and Greece enforce the 2001 Temporary Protection Directive and the 2003 Reception Directive?
– Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti ustrezno zaščito mladoletnikov brez spremstva, o katerih se poroča, da so prispeli na Lampeduso, glede na izjemno ranljiv položaj te skupine?
– Given the particularly vulnerable situation of unaccompanied minors reported to have arrived in Lampedusa, what does the Commission intend to do to ensure the adequate protection of this group?
– Kaj namerava Komisija storiti glede premestitve beguncev v EU in znotraj različnih držav članic, sploh kar zadeva prosilce, ki zahtevajo mednarodno zaščito?
– What does the Commission intend to do regarding the relocation of refugees in the EU and between the Member States, particularly regarding applicants who require international protection?
– Kako namerava Komisija vzpostaviti učinkovitejše solidarnostne mehanizme med državami članicami, da bi omogočili ponovno naselitev migrantov, ki prihajajo v območje Sredozemlja?
– What does the Commission intend to do to establish more systematic solidarity mechanisms among Member States in order to resettle migrants arriving in the Mediterranean region?
– Kako namerava Komisija dolgoročno zagotoviti, da se skupni azilni sistem EU vzpostavi do leta 2012?
– In the longer term, what does the Commission intend to do to ensure that the EU common asylum system becomes a reality by 2012?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000087/2011
Question for oral answer O-000087/2011
v imenu Odbora za peticije
on behalf of the Committee on Petitions
v imenu Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov Zadeva: Zavajajoči poslovni imeniki (peticije 0045/2006, 1475/2006 in druge)
on behalf of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Subject: Misleading business directories (Petitions 0045/2006, 1475/2006 and others)
Nekatera podjetja za imeniške storitve, ki so dejavna v različnih državah članicah EU, že dlje časa izvajajo zavajajoče poslovne prakse.
For a long time certain directory companies operating from different EU Member States have engaged in misleading business practices.
Take prakse so razvidne iz dokumentov, ki so jih Evropskemu parlamentu v številnih peticijah predložili samostojni podjetniki, prostovoljne organizacije in družinska podjetja, ki so bili žrtev zavajajočih podjetij za imeniške storitve.
Such practices have been evidenced in documentation submitted in a large number of petitions to the European Parliament by sole traders, voluntary organisations and family businesses that have fallen victim to misleading directory companies.
Poslanci Evropskega parlamenta še vedno prejemajo na stotine pritožb novih žrtev takih podjetij.
Hundreds of letters of complaint are still being received by MEPs from new victims of such directory companies.
Žrtve so pogosto premajhne, da bi si lahko privoščile stroške sodnega postopka proti tem podjetjem.
The victims are often too small to afford legal fees to wage legal action on the directory companies.
Po drugi strani ima veliko takšnih organizacij resne finančne težave zaradi plačil pristojbin, v katera so bila zavedena s podpisom.
On the other hand paying the fees which they were tricked into signing for has put several such organisations in severe financial hardship.
Zadeva je tudi mednarodne narave, ker so tarča zavajajočih poslovnih imenikov pogosto žrtve, ki imajo sedež v drugi državi članici EU.
The matter is also of a cross-border nature because the misleading business directories often target victims that are based in another EU Member State.
Komisija je jasno izrazila, da direktiva o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju „prepoveduje zavajajoče prakse teh podjetij za imeniške storitve”.
The Commission has clearly stated that the Directive on Misleading and Comparative Advertising 'outlaws the misleading practices of these directory companies'.
Po njenih navedbah se težava morda nanaša na izvrševanje nacionalnih zakonodaj.
According to the Commission the problem might relate to enforcement of the national legislations.
Vendar je Komisija ob drugih priložnostih tudi dodala, da je zakonodajo EU morda treba spremeniti tako, da bo ta posebna praksa dodana na črn seznam.
Nevertheless on other occasions the Commission has also stated that EU legislation may need to be changed to blacklist this specific practice.
Ali lahko Komisija potrdi, da je bila direktiva o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju pravilno prenesena v vseh državah članicah EU?
Can the Commission confirm that there has been correct transposition of the MCA Directive in all EU Member States?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena razmisliti o bistvenem skrajšanju roka za začetek in dokončanje načrtovane revizije obstoječe direktive o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju ali o določitvi novih zakonodajnih instrumentov, s katerimi bi ustavila te goljufive prakse?
Would the Commission consider substantially accelerating the time frame within which it plans to launch and complete its review on the current MCA directive or to find new legislative tools to stop these fraudulent practices?
Ali v državah članicah, kjer je bila direktiva o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju pravilno prenesena, to zadostuje za zaščito državljanov v tej državi članici v primeru zahtevkov tovrstnih podjetij, ki imajo sedež v drugi državi članici, v kateri direktiva o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju je oziroma ni bila pravilno prenesena?
Where there has been correct transposition of the MCA in a Member State, has this been sufficient to protect citizens in that Member State in the event of claims from such companies based in another Member State which may/may not have transposed the MCA correctly?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000088/2011/rev.1
Question for oral answer O-000088/2011/rev.1
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Trgovinski odnosi med EU in Japonsko
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: EU-Japan trade relations
Izvoz EU na Japonsko, izražen kot delež BDP, je znatno nižji od velikosti deležev izvoza na druge glavne trge EU, kot so ZDA, Kitajska, Koreja ali Indija.
EU exports to Japan, in relation to GDP, are considerably below those to the EU’s other main markets, such as the US, China, Korea or India.
V trgovinskih odnosih med tema dvema gospodarstvoma obstaja določen neizkoriščen potencial, od katerega bi lahko imeli koristi obe strani in ki skupaj znaša 35 % svetovnega BDP.
There is significant untapped potential in trade relations between these two economies that could benefit both parties, which together account for 35% of global GDP.
Na vrhu EU-Japonska 2009 so voditelji izrazili namero v zvezi s tesnejšim povezovanjem svojih gospodarstev, da bi lahko v celoti izkoristili gospodarsko sodelovanje.
At the EU-Japan Summit in 2009 the leaders expressed their intention to strengthen the integration of their economies in order fully to capitalise on their economic relationship.
Kaj je za izboljšanje gospodarskega in poslovnega sodelovanja od vrha leta 2009 storila Komisija ?
What has the Commission done to enhance the economic and commercial relationship since the 2009 summit?
Kaj je storila Komisija, da bi se izognila netarifnim ukrepom, ki vplivajo na trgovino in vlaganja, zlasti s spodbujanjem pregledne regulativne politike in z uporabo obstoječega dvostranskega dialoga?
What has the Commission done to alleviate non-tariff measures having an impact on trade and investment, in particular by promoting transparent regulatory policy and by using existing bilateral dialogues?
Kako ocenjuje prizadevanja Japonske v zvezi s tem vprašanjem?
What view does it take of the efforts made by Japan in this regard?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen v zvezi z geografskimi označbami in kaj je bilo storjeno za spodbujanje boljšega dostopa do trgov javnih naročil?
What progress has been achieved in respect of geographical indications, and what has been done to facilitate enhanced access to the respective government procurement markets?
Katere sklepe je sprejela Komisija glede posvetovanj o trgovinskem sodelovanju med EU in Japonsko, ki se je začelo jeseni 2010?
What are the Commission’s conclusions regarding the consultations on EU-Japan trade relations which were launched in autumn 2010?
Kdaj namerava Komisija objaviti podrobno oceno vzdržnosti in vpliva o trgovinskem sodelovanju med EU in Japonsko?
When does the Commission intend to publish the comprehensive sustainability and impact assessment on EU-Japan trade relations?
Ali bo zagotovila temeljito oceno prednosti in slabosti možnega prihodnjega prostotrgovinskega sporazuma med EU in Japonsko, predvsem za vse industrijske sektorje, na primer avtomobilsko industrijo, elektroniko, letalstvo in strojno industrijo?
Will it provide a thorough assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of a possible future EU-Japan FTA, in particular for all industrial sectors such as the automotive, electronics, aviation and machinery sectors?
Kateri pogoji bi morali biti po mnenju Komisije izpolnjeni pred opredelitvijo obsega trgovinskih pogajanj?
What prerequisites does the Commission consider should be fulfilled before the scope of these trade talks is defined?
Ali bodo pogajanja vključevala sporazum o vlaganjih?
Would the negotiations cover an investment agreement?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000089/2011
Question for oral answer O-000089/2011
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Revizija Akta za mala podjetja
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Small Business Act (SBA) review
Komisija je 23. februarja 2011, dve leti in pol po sprejetju Akta za mala podjetja v juniju 2008, sprejela Sporočilo o pregledu Akta za mala podjetja za Evropo (KOM(2011)0078).
On 23 February 2011, two and a half years after the adoption of the SBA in June 2008, the Commission adopted the Communication on Review of the Small Business Act for Europe (COM(2011)0078).
Decembra 2009 je pripravila in objavila prvo poročilo o izvajanju Akta za mala podjetja na ravni EU in na ravni držav članic.
The Commission carried out and published a first report on implementation of the SBA at EU and Member State level in December 2009.
V sporočilu je na podlagi ugotovitev iz poročila predlagala sklop novih in posodobljenih ukrepov in dejavnosti za reševanje izzivov, povezanih s pravilnim izvajanjem načel Akta za mala podjetja.
Based on findings in that report, the Commission proposed in its Communication a set of new and renewed measures/actions on tackling identified challenges to the proper implementation of the SBA principles.
Kako namerava Svet doseči boljše izpolnjevanje obljub iz leta 2009 glede izvajanja načel Akta za mala podjetja, kot sta na primer načelo „najprej pomisli na male“ in test MSP?
How is the Council planning to better deliver on its 2009 promises with regard to the implementation of the SBA principles, such as the ‘Think Small First’ principle and the SME test?
Ali Svet pričakuje, da se bo zastoj glede Statuta o evropskih zasebnih družbah razrešil do konca leta 2011?
Does the Council expect to resolve the deadlock on the European private company statute before the end of 2011?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000090/2011
Question for oral answer O-000090/2011
Komisija je 23. februarja 2011, dve leti in pol po sprejetju Akta za mala podjetja v juniju 2008, sprejela sporočilo o pregledu Akta za mala podjetja za Evropo (KOM(2011)0078).
On 23 February 2011, two and a half years after the adoption of the SBA in June 2008, the Commission adopted the Communication on Review of the Small Business Act for Europe (COM(2011)0078).
V sporočilu je na podlagi ugotovitev iz poročila predlagala sklop novih in posodobljenih ukrepov in dejavnosti za z reševanje izzivov, povezanih s pravilnim izvajanjem načel Akta za mala podjetja.
Based on findings in that report, the Commission proposed in its Communication a set of new and renewed measures/actions on tackling identified challenges to the proper implementation of the SBA principles.
Katere ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bi zagotovila boljše izvajanje načel Akta za mala podjetja v državah članicah, kot sta na primer načeli „najprej pomisli na male“ in test MSP?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to ensure a better implementation of the SBA principles, such as the ‘Think Small First’ principle and the SME test, in the Member States?
Ali namerava Komisija nameniti večji poudarek finančnim instrumentom, ki že uspešno delujejo, vendar je njihov obseg nezadosten (instrumenti programa za konkurenčnost in inovacije in instrumenti Evropske investicijske banke), ali pa tistim, ki so bolj primerni za financiranje tveganja za MSP, kot so dolžniško-lastniški instrumenti?
Does the Commission intend to put a stronger emphasis on those financial instruments which are already working successfully but are not sufficient in volume (CIP, EIB ones) or those that are better suited to financing risk for SMEs such as mezzanine instruments?
Ali je Komisija izpolnila obljubo o zmanjšanju upravnega bremena za MSP za 25 odstotkov?
Has the Commission delivered on its promise to cut the administrative burden for SMEs by 25%?
Ali ima na voljo natančno analizo, ki bi pokazala, da je prišlo do znatnega zmanjšanja, če upoštevamo vso veljavno in predlagano zakonodajo?
Is a clear analysis available showing that there has been a net reduction taking into account all legislation, both in force and proposed?
O katerih pobudah razmišlja Komisija, da bi MSP pomagala dejavno sprejemati ukrepe za zmanjšanje vpliva na okolje in da bi imela MSP gospodarsko korist od ukrepov za energetsko učinkovitost?
What initiatives is the Commission considering to help SMEs actively engage in actions reducing their environmental impact today and to gain economic benefits from energy efficiency measures?
V času vse večjih demografskih izzivov se MSP soočajo z ostro konkurenco na področju kvalificirane delovne sile; sporočilo o pregledu Akta za mala podjetja žal ne posveča pozornosti trgom dela in potrebi MSP po spretnostih in znanju.
At a time of increasing demographic challenges SMEs are facing fierce competition for a skilled workforce; unfortunately, the SBA Review Communication lacks attention to labour markets and SMEs’ skills requirements.
Kaj načrtuje Komisija v zvezi s tem?
What does the Commission plan in this regard?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000091/2011
Question for oral answer O-000091/2011
Zadeva: Odnosi EU z Mongolijo
Subject: EU relations with Mongolia
Odnosi Evropske unije z Mongolijo trenutno temeljijo na dvostranskem sporazumu o trgovini in sodelovanju iz leta 1993.
At present, EU relations with Mongolia are based on the framework of the 1993 EU-Mongolia Trade and Cooperation Agreement.
Evropska unija in Mongolija sta sedaj v procesu sklenitve sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju.
The EU and Mongolia, however, are in the process of concluding a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA).
Ta sporazum, ki je bil sklenjen 20. decembra 2010 v Ulan Batorju, še ni podpisan in čaka na ratifikacijo Evropske unije in držav članic (v skladu z njihovimi postopki ratifikacije).
This Agreement, initialled on 20 December 2010 in Ulaanbaatar, has not been signed yet, and awaits ratification by the EU and by the Member States (according to their respective ratification procedures).
Zaradi tega mora biti Evropskemu parlamentu predložen v postopek odobritve.
The Agreement, therefore, will have to be submitted to the European Parliament under the consent procedure.
Ob tem je treba še omeniti, da Evropska unija v Ulan Batorju še nima svoje delegacije.
In this context it is also important to underline that the EU is not yet represented by a Delegation in Ulaanbaatar.
Ta bi pomembno prispevala k nadaljnjem poglabljanju političnega in gospodarskega sodelovanja.
Such an initiative could significantly contribute to a further deepening of our political and economic cooperation.
Ali lahko Komisija, ob upoštevanju vezi, ki so se razvile med EU in Mongolijo – stabilno državo, v kateri demokratično gibanje letos proslavlja stoletnico –, Parlament seznani:
Taking into consideration the ties that have developed between the EU and Mongolia, a stable country whose democratic movement will be celebrating its centenary this year, can the Commission inform Parliament:
– kakšne so glavne značilnosti sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju in kakšen je predvideni koledar za ratifikacijo sporazuma in začetek njegove veljavnosti?
– on the main characteristics of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement and the foreseeable schedule for ratification and subsequent entry into force?
– kakšne so možnosti, da bi v Ulan Batorju v bližnji prihodnosti odprli urad delegacije Evropske unije?
– on the possibilities of opening a European Union Delegation in Ulaanbaatar in the near future?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000092/2011
Question for oral answer O-000092/2011
v imenu Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve Zadeva: Konvencija Mednarodne organizacije dela, dopolnjena s priporočilom o delavcih v gospodinjstvu
on behalf of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Subject: ILO Convention supplemented by a recommendation on domestic workers
Delo je v večini primerov negotovo, podcenjeno in neprijavljeno.
Mostly the work is precarious, undervalued and undeclared.
Zaradi tega so delavci v gospodinjstvu pogosto diskriminirani in so včasih žrtve diskriminatorne in nepravične obravnave ali zlorabe.
As a result, domestic workers are often discriminated and sometimes subjected to discriminatory, unfair and abusive treatment.
Vse več teh delavcev je (neprijavljenih) delavcev migrantov, ki so izpostavljeni izkoriščanju.
A growing number of these workers are (undocumented) migrant workers and may be subject to exploitation.
Sprejetje konvencije Mednarodne organizacije dela o delavcih v gospodinjstvu bo pomembno sredstvo pri zagotavljanju spoštovanja človekovih, delavskih in socialnih pravic teh delavcev.
The adoption of an ILO convention on domestic workers will be an important element to ensure the human, employment and social rights of domestic workers are respected.
Kakšno vlogo namerava igrati Komisija v pogajanjih Mednarodne organizacije dela za sprejetje konvencije, dopolnjene s priporočilom o dostojnem delu delavcev v gospodinjstvu?
What role does the Commission believe it can play in the ILO negotiations regarding the adoption of a convention supplemented by a recommendation on decent work for domestic workers?
Kako bo v strategiji EU 2020 zagotovljeno, da bo negotovo delo v gospodinjstvu postalo dostojno in stalno?
How will the EU2020 strategy ensure that precarious domestic jobs are transformed into decent, sustainable jobs?
Ali namerava Komisija spremeniti veljavno zakonodajo, kot sta direktivi Sveta 89/391/EGS in 2000/78/ES, da bi vanjo vključili delavce v gospodinjstvu?
Does the Commission plan to amend current legislation such as Council Directives 89/391/EEC and 2000/78/EC to ensure the inclusion of domestic workers?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, na kakšen način podpira države članice pri njihovem oblikovanju in izvrševanju politike za krepitev delavskih pravic delavcev v gospodinjstvu in obveščanje le teh o njihovih pravicah?
Can the Commission indicate how it is supporting Member States in developing and enforcing policies to strengthen the labour rights of domestic workers and inform them about their rights?
Ali Komisija spodbuja izmenjavo najboljših praks na področju politike, namenjene delavcem v gospodinjstvu?
Is the Commission promoting exchanges of best practice regarding policies aimed at domestic workers?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000093/2011
Question for oral answer O-000093/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Odzivi držav članic na migracijske tokove in njihov vpliv na Schengen
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Member States' answers to migration flows and their impact on Schengen
Prejšnji teden je Francija v bližini italijanskega mesta Ventimiglia uvedla mejno kontrolo, potem ko je italijanska vlada podpisala odredbo, s katero upravnim organom dovoljuje, da 25 800 tunizijskim migrantom, ki so po padcu režima v njihovi državi prispeli na Lampeduso, podelijo dovoljenje za začasno bivanje.
Last week France instituted border controls near the Italian town of Ventimiglia after the Italian Government signed a decree allowing the authorities to deliver temporary residence permits to the 25 800 Tunisian migrants who have arrived in Lampedusa since the fall of the regime in that country.
Spor med Francijo in Italijo glede priseljevanja in nesolidarnost EU z državami članicami, ki so na frontni črti migracijske problematike, ima škodljive posledice za schengenski sistem.
The dispute between France and Italy over migration and the lack of EU solidarity with Member States in the front line of the migration problem are having damaging consequences on the Schengen system.