natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice, regionalne in lokalne oblasti ter organi javnega prava lahko v teh skupinah enakovredno sodelujejo, kot je navedeno v odprtem seznamu priloge III Direktive 2004/18/ES z 31. marca 2004.
Member States, regional and local authorities and bodies governed by public law can take part equally in these groupings, as set out in the non-exhaustive list in Annex III of Directive 2004/18/CE of 31 March 2004.
To pomeni, da bi se lahko na zelo različnih področjih oblikovalo ogromno število evropskih skupin.
This means a huge number of potential European groupings in very different fields.
Glavna nova značilnost uredbe je, da daje takim oblikam skupin pravno osebnost, ki ima implicitno vrednost in zaradi katere je sodelovanje znotraj EU lažje tako z vidika delovanja kot z vidika razvoja.
The main new characteristic of this regulation is that it gives this type of grouping a legal personality, which has an implicit value and makes cooperation easier within the EU from both an operational and a development point of view.
Teh oblik sodelovanja tudi ne bo nujno sofinancirala EU, kar odpira možnost za pridružitev.
Moreover, this form of cooperation will not necessarily be co-financed by the EU, which opens up the possibilities for joining it.
Da bi se ta uredba začela izvajati, bi morale države članice pripraviti določbe, s katerimi bi zagotovile njeno učinkovito izvedbo najkasneje s 1. avgustom 2007.
In order for implementation of this regulation to begin, the Member States should have made such provisions as are appropriate to ensure its effective implementation by 1 August 2007 at the latest.
Doslej na žalost opažamo, da države članice še niso prilagodile svoje zakonodaje niti niso sprejele ustreznih ukrepov, ki bi omogočili njeno izvajanje, zato je nemogoče, da bi se do 1. avgusta 2007 ta uredba izvajala v vseh državah članicah.
We unfortunately note that the Member States have not yet adapted their legislation or taken the relevant measures to allow the regulation to be implemented and, as a consequence, this regulation could not possibly have come into force in all the Member States by 1 August 2007.
Ker s tem države članice grobo kršijo načela Skupnosti, posledica česar je gospodarska škoda za prizadete strani:
In view of this situation of flagrant breach of Community law by the Member States, with the consequent economic damage to those affected:
Katere ukrepe je sprejel Svet, da bi to popravil?
What actions are being taken by the Council to correct this situation?
UL L 210 z dne 31.7.2006, str.
JO L 210 du 31.7.2006, p.
UL L 134 z dne 30.4.2006, str.
JO L 134 du 30.4.2004, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0076/07/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0076/07/rev.1
Katere ukrepe je sprejela Komisija, da bi to popravila?
What actions are being taken by the Commission to correct this situation?
Ali namerava Komisija – glede na to, da mora zagotoviti spoštovanje obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Pogodb – začeti postopek?
Given that it is the responsibility and the duty of the Commission to enforce compliance with obligations derived from the Treaties, will the Commission be initiating the relevant procedure?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0077/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0077/07
Zadeva: Potek memoranduma o soglasju med EU in Kitajsko glede uvoza nekaterih tekstilnih izdelkov in oblačil
Subject: Expiry of the Memorandum of Understanding between the EU and China on imports of certain textile and clothing products
Ob upoštevanju, da memorandum o soglasju med EU in Kitajsko glede uvoza nekaterih tekstilnih izdelkov in oblačil v države Evropske unije poteče 31. decembra letos, je Komisija naprošena, da odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
The Memorandum of Understanding between the EU and China on certain textile and clothing exports from China to the EU Member States is due to expire on 31 December 2007.
Kako ocenjuje posledice liberalizacije trgovine tekstila in oblačil z vidika zaprtja in selitve podjetij ter z vidika izgube delovnih mest v strateškem sektorju EU?
What assessment does the Commission make of the consequences of the liberalisation of trade in textile and clothing products as regards the closure and relocation of companies and job losses in this strategic EU sector?
Kakšne so njene napovedi glede socialno-ekonomskih posledic nadaljnje liberalizacije trgovine v tem sektorju, zlasti v smislu izgube delovnih mest v EU?
And what will be the socio-economic consequences of further liberalisation of trade in this sector, in particular with regard to job losses in the EU?
Zakaj ni izbrala podaljšanje obdobja uporabe omejitev, kakor predvidevajo določbe sporazumov, sklenjenih med Kitajsko in Združenimi državami Amerike?
Why did the Commission not choose to extend the period of application of restrictions, as envisaged in the agreements between China and the United States?
Kako se namerava v letu 2008 izogniti ponovnemu nastanku položaja, kakršen je bil v letu 2005 z eksponentno rastjo uvoza tekstila, s sistemom dvojnega preverjanja za uvoz iz Kitajske?
How will it avoid a recurrence in 2008 of the situation which occurred in 2005, with an exponential increase in textile imports, through the double-checking system for imports from China?
Z drugimi besedami, koliko se mora uvoz še povečati, da bo začela ukrepati?
In other words, how much do imports need to increase before it decides to takes action?
Kakšna je razdelitev dodane vrednosti po posameznih elementih verige vrednosti sektorja, zlasti glede na uvožene izdelke?
How is added value broken down between the various components of the sector's value-chain, especially with regard to imported products?
Koliko zahtev za aktiviranje Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji je bilo vloženih in odobrenih v zvezi z omenjenim preoblikovanjem tekstilne in oblačilne industrijo v EU?
How many requests for the 'European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to be activated have been submitted and approved in the context of the restructuring of the textile and clothing industry in the EU?
Koliko finančnih sredstev Skupnosti je za obdobje 2007–2013 namenjenih posodobitvi tekstilne in oblačilne industrije v EU?
What Community financial resources have been set aside for 2007-2013 with a view to modernising the EU textile and clothing industry?
Zakaj ne predlaga posebnega programa Skupnosti za pomoč sektorju?
Why is the Commission not putting forward a specific Community programme of aid for the sector?
Kako se namerava boriti proti ponarejanju?
How does it plan to combat counterfeiting?
Kaj meni o zahtevi za certificirano kakovost, preglednost, sledljivost, sestavo in poreklo izdelkov v tekstilnem, konfekcijskem, usnjarskem in obutvenem sektorju, ki jo je predstavil sektor?
What does it think of the call for certified quality, transparency, traceability, composition and origin of textile, clothing, leather and footwear products submitted by the sector?
Katere cilje na področju tekstila in oblačil namerava doseči pri pogajanjih s STO?
What objectives does it intend to achieve at the WTO negotiations in the field of textile and clothing products?
Kakšen je sedanji položaj pogajanj v zvezi s tem?
What is the current state of negotiations in this respect?
Ali ne meni, da bo predlog za oprostitev plačila protidampinških dajatev evropskim podjetjem, ki svojo proizvodnjo selijo in potem izdelke izvažajo v EU, položaj sektorja v EU še poslabšal?
Does it not consider that the proposal to exempt from payment of anti-dumping duty European companies which relocate their production and then export their products to the EU will further aggravate the sector's position in the EU?
Ali ne meni nasprotno, da je treba ukiniti vso pomoč evropskim podjetjem, ki selijo svojo industrijsko dejavnost?
Does it not consider, on the contrary, that steps should be taken to abolish all aid to European companies which relocate their industrial activities?
Kako namerava Komisija ukrepati glede na smernice, ki jih je za ta sektor določila skupina na visoki ravni?
What action will it take on the guidelines laid down by the High-Level Group for this sector?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0078/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0078/07
V zadnjih letih so v različnih državah članicah na mednarodni ravni delovala številna tako imenovana podjetja za imeniške storitve (na primer podjetje European City Guides), ki so uporabljala zavajajoče in nepoštene poslovne prakse.
Over the past years, a number of so-called 'Directory companies' (for instance 'European City Guides') have been operating cross-border in several EU Member States applying misleading and fraudulent business practices.
Ta podjetja z goljufijo zavedejo poklicne delavce in mala podjetja, da se za več let registrirajo v sleparskih imenikih za ceno do 1000 EUR letno.
The consequence of such scams is usually the unwanted 'registration' of professionals and small companies in rogue 'directories' for several years, at a cost of up to € 1000 per year.
Te vsote dosledno pobirajo specializirane agencije, kar pomeni, da so žrtve soočene s precejšno finančno izgubo in verjetno tudi s pravnimi stroški.
These amounts are then rigorously collected through specialised agencies, leaving the victims with a substantial financial loss and possibly also legal costs.
Ko se takšna podjetja odkrijejo in zaprejo, se pogosto preselijo in nadaljujejo izvajanje svojih nepoštenih praks.
When spotted and closed down, these companies have frequently managed to relocate and take up their fraudulent practices as before.
Člani odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov so v povezavi s temi primeri prejeli številne pritožbe evropskih državljanov in poslovne skupnosti.
IMCO Committee Members have received numerous complaints from citizens and the business community about such cases.
Zato odbor meni, da morajo države članice nemudoma ukrepati na usklajen način, da preprečijo nadaljnje delovanje takšnih podjetij z imeniškimi storitvami in škodo evropski poslovni skupnosti.
The Committee therefore feels immediate and coordinated action by Member States is needed to prevent these 'directory companies' from operating and causing further damage to the European business community.
Odbor zato zastavlja Svetu Evropske unije naslednja vprašanja:
The Committee therefore asks the Council of the European Union the following questions.
Ali se države članice zavedajo, kakšne so razsežnosti tega problema za evropsko poslovno skupnost, zlasti za mala in srednje velika podjetja?
Are Member States aware of the magnitude of this problem for the European business community, and particularly for SMEs?
Kaj so ukrenile za zaprtje teh sleparskih podjetij z imeniškimi storitvami?
What action have they taken to close down these rogue 'directory companies'?
So države članice pripravljene deliti svoje informacije z organi za nadzor trga drugih držav članic, da bi jih opozorile o lažnih dejavnostih podjetij z imeniškimi storitvami in njihovih upravnikih oziroma lastnikih?
Are Member States prepared to exchange information with other Member States' market surveillance authorities in order to warn them about fake 'directory companies'’ operations as well as their managers/owners?
S katerimi ukrepi se odpravlja vrzeli, ki so nastale pri prenosu direktive o zavajajočem oglašanju (84/450/EGS )?
What steps are being undertaken to close loopholes created in the transposition of the Misleading Advertising Directive 84/450/EEC ?
Katere ukrepe so sprejele države članice, da bi opozorile poslovno skupnost o nevarnosti lažnih podjetij z imeniškimi storitvami, in za pomoč tistim podjetjem, ki so bile žrtve teh nepoštenih dejavnosti?
What measures have Member States put in place to warn the business community about the threat of fake 'directory companies' and to assist those companies who are victims of these fraudulent practices?
Ali se države članice strinjajo, da bi morali obseg direktive 2005/29/ES o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah , ki vključuje tudi vidike zavajajočega oglaševanja, namenjenega potrošnikom, razširiti na medpodjetniško sodelovanje?
Do Member States agree that the Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practice (UCP) , which also applies to advertising and aspects of misleading advertising directed at consumers, should be extended to business-to-business (B2B) transactions?
UL L 250, 19.9.1984, str.
OJ L 250, 19.9.1984, p.
UL L 149, 11.6.2005, str.
OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0079/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0079/07
Ali ne obstaja bojazen, da se bo kljub bolje zavarovanim kreditnim sistemom v Evropi sprožil nepremičninski plaz, ki mu bo sledila destabilizacija evropskih bančnih sistemov?
Although our loan systems in Europe are based on sounder guarantees, there is a possibility that the housing bubble will burst, thus destabilising our banking systems.
Poleg tega so se cene nepremičnin, tako glede njihove gradnje kot najema, v zadnjih letih tako povečale, da so se bile številne družine primorane zelo zadolžiti ali pa ne morejo dobiti dostojnega bivališča.
Furthermore, housing prices (in both sales and rental markets) have risen to such an extent over recent years that many families have been forced to take out extremely large loans or are unable to find decent housing.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0080/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0080/07
Zadeva: Evropska strategija za Rome
Subject: A European Roma strategy
Aprila 2005 je Evropski parlament sprejel resolucijo o položaju Romov ( P6_TA(2005)0151 ), v kateri je pozval Evropsko komisijo, naj v sporočilu obrazloži, kako bi lahko EU na najboljši način uskladila in spodbudila prizadevanja za izboljšanje položaja Romov, ter sprejme akcijski načrt z jasnimi priporočili za države članice.
In April 2005, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the situation of Roma ( P6_TA(2005)0151 ), calling on the European Commission to prepare a communication on how the EU could best coordinate and promote efforts to improve the situation of the Roma and to adopt an action plan with clear recommendations to the Member States.
V resoluciji je bilo tudi predlagano, da se razmisli o priznanju Romov kot evropske transnacionalne manjšine.
The resolution also suggested considering recognising the Roma as a transnational European minority.
Glede na pomanjkljivo splošno izboljšanje položaja evropskih Romov, bo Svet leta 2008 prednostno obravnaval romska vprašan ja?
Considering the lack of overall improvement of the situation of European Roma, will the Council attach priority to addressing Roma issues in 2008?
Bo Svet v okviru leta medkulturnega dialoga sprožil razpravo o položaju Romov v država članicah EU?
Will the Council launch a debate on the position of Roma in EU Member States in the framework of the Year of Intercultural Dialogue?
Položaj Romov se razlikuje od položaja drugih manjšin v Evropi, saj so Romi historično prisotni v mnogih evropskih državah, medtem ko ozemeljska razsežnost ni prisotna.
The position of Roma is distinct from that of other minorities in Europe, since Roma are historically present in many European countries, while any territorial dimension is absent.
Priznanje tega dejstva bi okrepilo skupno odgovornost EU in njenih držav članic, da spodbujajo vključevanje Romov.
Recognition of this fact would underpin the shared responsibility of the EU and its Member States to promote Roma inclusion.
Ali Svet razmišlja o sprejetju izjave, ki bi priznala poseben položaj evropskih Romov, ter o potrditvi svoje zavezanosti skupnim prizadevanjem, da se pospeši njihovo vključevanje?
Is the Council considering adopting a declaration to acknowledge the distinct position of European Roma and to assert its commitment to a collective effort to promote Roma inclusion?
Ali namerava Svet slediti predlogu Romunije o pripravi akcijskega načrta Skupnosti o Romih in pozvati Evropsko komisijo, naj pripravi specifične predloge za pospeševanje vključevanja Romov?
Is the Council considering following the Romanian proposal to develop a Community Action Plan on Roma, asking the European Commission to come forward with specific proposals to promote Roma inclusion?
Bo Svet z namenom, da oceni in podpre prizadevanja vseh držav (držav članic EU in drugih) za vključevanje Romov, uvrstil napredek in predhodne rezultate „Desetletja vključevanja Romov“ na dnevni red sveta za socialne zadeve leta 2008?
Will the Council place the progress and preliminary results of the ‘Decade of Roma Inclusion’ on the agenda of the Social Affairs Council in 2008, with a view to evaluating and supporting the efforts of all countries (both EU Member States and non-member states) to promote Roma inclusion?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0081/07/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0081/07/rev.1
Čeprav je bilo v zvezi z vprašanjem Romov sprejetih že mnogo pobud, Evropska komisija doslej še ni predstavila celostnega akcijskega načrta.
A series of initiatives has been taken that touch on Roma issues, but the European Commission has so far not come forward with a comprehensive action plan.
Ali namerava Evropska komisija v prihodnjem letu ob upoštevanju omenjene zahteve Evropskega parlamenta pripraviti osnutek sporočila o vprašanju Romov?
Does the European Commission intend to draft a Communication on Roma issues in the coming year, having in mind the above mentioned request of the European Parliament?
Kolikšna sredstva imajo na voljo države članice, ki si prizadevajo za vključevanje romskih skupnosti?
What is the amount of European funds available for Member States aiming at the integration of Roma communities?
Je Komisija opravila oceno dejanskega vpliva evropskih sredstev na vključevanje Romov?
Has the Commission conducted any evaluation of the actual impact of European funding on Roma inclusion?
Ali Evropska komisija upošteva možnost prilagoditve svojih institucionalnih struktur, da bi te lahko bolj učinkovito reševale vprašanj v zvezi z Romi?
Is the European Commission considering the possibility of adapting its institutional structures in order to deal in a more effective way with Roma issues?
Je Evropska komisija pripravljena ustanoviti enoto za Rome ali medresorsko skupino za Rome?
Is the European Commission prepared to create a Roma Unit or establish a Roma Inter-service Group?
Če ni pripravljena, kako namerava zagotoviti učinkovito usklajevanje prizadevanj v podporo družbenega in gospodarskega vključevanja romskih skupnosti z drugimi političnimi pobudami?
If not, how will the European Commission ensure effective coordination of its efforts to support the social and economic integration of Roma communities with other policy initiatives?
Bi Evropska komisija razmislila o možnosti, da primarno odgovornost za vprašanja Romov prenese na eno samo področje delovanja Evropske komisije?
Would the European Commission consider conferring primary responsibility for Roma issues into a single European Commissioner’s portfolio?
Je Evropska komisija pripravljena izvajati spodbujevalne ukrepe za družbeno integracijo Romov, kot priporoča Direktiva 2000/43/ES ?
Is the European Commission ready to enforce incentive measures for the social integration of Roma people, as Directive 2000/43/EC recommends ?
Ali Evropska komisija razmišlja o možnosti, da bi se bolj vključila v pobudo „Desetletje vključevanja Romov“ in morda imenovala svojega koordinatorja za romska vprašanja?
Is the European Commission considering the possibility of becoming more involved in the 'Decade of Roma Inclusion' initiative, possibly by appointing an EC Coordinator for Roma issues?
UL L 180 z dne 19.7.2000, str.
OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0082/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0082/07
Zadeva: Status poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, izvoljenih na Poljskem
Subject: Status of MEPs elected in Poland
Za volitve v Evropski parlament na Poljskem velja akt z dne 23. januarja 2004.
Elections to the European Parliament in Poland are governed by the Act of 23 January 2004.
Člen 9 tega akta opredeljuje, da imajo kandidati pravico biti voljeni, če izpolnjujejo naslednja merila:
Article 9 of that Act provides that the following necessary criteria must be satisfied in order for a person to be eligible for election.
Na volitvah v Evropski parlament v Republiki Poljski posameznik lahko kandidira, če ima pravico voliti poslance Evropskega parlamenta, je na dan glasovanja star najmanj 21 let, ni bila kaznovan zaradi namerno storjenega kaznivega dejanja in obtožen kaznivega dejanja ter ima bivališče v Republiki Poljski ali drugi državi članici Evropske unije, katere državljan je najmanj 5 let.
The person shall be eligible for elections to the European Parliament held in the Republic of Poland, if he or she has the right to elect deputies to the European Parliament and has reached the age of at least 21 years on the day of the vote, has not been punished for a crime done intentionally and prosecuted by indictment, and is a resident of the Republic of Poland or of another Member State of the European Union, of which he or she is a citizen for at least 5 years.
V odstavku 17 tega akta (o prenehanju veljavnosti ali izgubi sedeža) so v členu 142(1) opisane mogoče situacije, zaradi katerih bi poslanec EP, izvoljen na Poljskem, izgubil svoj sedež v Parlamentu.
In Chapter 17 of this Act (on expiration and forfeiture of the seat), Article 142 paragraph 1 describes the possible situations where an MEP elected in Poland would lose his or her seat in the Parliament.
Izguba sedeža poslanca v Evropskem parlamentu sledi, če:
The forfeiture of a seat of a deputy to the European Parliament shall be a result of:
poslanec ne izpolnjuje več pogojev za pridobitev sedeža ali jih ni izpolnjeval na dan glasovanja;
forfeiture of eligibility, or lack of eligibility on the day of the vote;
poslanec je na dan glasovanja imel funkcijo, navedeno v členu 5 in členu 6(2), ali pa je bil nanjo imenovan v obdobju mandata v Evropskem parlamentu;
the holding on the day of the vote by the deputy of a post or function, or appointment during the term of the European Parliament to a post or function, set out in Article 5 and Article 6, paragraph 2, save for paragraph 2;
poslanec je bil izvoljen v poljski parlament ali senat;
election to the Sejm or to the Senate;
izvolitev poslanca v Evropski parlament je bila razveljavljena.
invalidation of an election of a deputy to the European Parliament.
Združena uporaba teh določb nakazuje, da poslanec Evropskega parlamenta samodejno izgubi sedež, če je obsojen za kaznivo dejanje.
The combined application of those provisions would suggest that an MEP would lose his or her seat automatically in the event that he or she was the subject of a final judgment imposing a criminal conviction.
Za poslance poljskega parlamenta ne velja noben podoben predpis.
No similar provision exists in respect of members of the Polish Parliament.
Ali Evropska komisija meni, da Poljska s tem, ko ohranja različno zakonodajo za poslance nacionalnega parlamenta in poslance Evropskega parlamenta, krši pravo Evropske skupnosti (zlasti člen 10(a) protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti)?
Does the European Commission consider that Poland is in breach of the EC law (in particular Article 10(a) of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities) by maintaining different legislation with regard to members of the national parliament and Members of the European Parliament?
Ali se namerava Komisija obrniti na Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, da bi dosegla, da Poljska ustrezno spremeni svoje pravo tako, da bo pravilno izvajala Pogodbo?
Does the Commission intend to seise the Court of Justice in order to ensure that Poland makes the necessary changes to its law in order to apply the Treaty properly?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0001/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0001/08
Zadeva: Higiensko-sanitarne izredne razmere z odpadki v Kampaniji
Subject: Health and hygiene emergency caused by waste in Campania
Kako Komisija ocenjuje ta položaj, glede na težavnost higiensko-sanitarnih razmer, v katerih so se znašli prebivalci Kampanije?
how it views this situation in terms of the serious health and hygiene conditions in which the people of Campania now have to live;