natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Angleška različica besedila, ki so jo posredovale madžarske oblasti, je dostopna na http://www.euractiv.com/sites/all/euractiv/files/CONSTITUTION_in_English__DRAFT.pdf; preambule k ustavi madžarske oblasti niso objavile, je pa dostopna na http://www.euractiv.com/sites/all/euractiv/files/BRNEDA224_004970.pdf.
The English version of the text provided by the Hungarian authorities is available at http://www.euractiv.com/sites/all/euractiv/files/CONSTITUTION_in_English__DRAFT.pdf; the preamble of the Constitution was not circulated by the HU authorities but is available at http://www.euractiv.com/sites/all/euractiv/files/BRNEDA224_004970.pdf.
Nevladne organizacije so poslale drug prevod teh dokumentov in poudarile napake ter manjkajoče dele v prevodu (ki so ga posredovale madžarske oblasti).
NGOs have provided another translation of these documents and have highlighted mistakes and omissions in the HU authorities’ translations.
Člen XXXI(1): prevoda madžarskih oblasti in nevladnih organizacij se razlikujeta.
Article XXI (1): HU authorities’ and NGOs’ translations differ.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000073/2011
Question for oral answer O-000073/2011
Ali bo Komisija po postopku prenove madžarske ustave preverila, ali so načrtovane prenove v skladu s Pogodbami in pravom EU, zlasti s členi 2, 6 in 7 PEU, skupnimi demokratičnimi ustavnimi načeli in pravili o glasovalnih pravicah na volitvah v Evropski parlament?
Is the Commission following the reform process of the Hungarian Constitution to check whether the foreseen reforms are in conformity with the EU Treaties and law and notably with Article 2.6 and 7 TEU, common democratic constitutional principles and with the rules on voting rights for EP elections?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000074/2011
Question for oral answer O-000074/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Test izjemnih situacij v bančnem sektorju EU
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Stress tests of the EU banking sector
Testi izjemnih situacij, ki jih je Odbor evropskih bančnih nadzornikov julija 2010 opravil v sodelovanju s Komisijo, niso uspeli povrniti zaupanja v finančni sektor EU.
The stress tests undertaken by the Committee on European Banking Supervision (CEBS) in cooperation with the Commission in July 2010 have failed to restore confidence in the EU financial sector.
Na novo ustanovljeni Evropski bančni organ je scenarije in metodologije za svoje teste izjemnih situacij v bančništvu objavil 18. marca 2011.
The newly established European Banking Authority released the scenarios and methodology for its banking stress tests on 18 March 2011.
Čeprav se zdi, da so se pri teh testih upoštevale nekatere pridobljene izkušnje iz preteklosti, najbolj črni scenariji, kot je nezmožnost izpolnjevanja finančnih obveznosti, niso bili zajeti.
Although some lessons from the past seem to have been taken into account in these stress tests, the most adverse scenarios such as a sovereign default are not taken into consideration.
Glede na to, da se bo verodostojnost celotnega evropskega finančnega institucionalnega okvira ocenjevala na podlagi kakovosti izvedbe testiranja, bi Komisiji radi postavili naslednja vprašanja:
As the credibility of the whole European financial institutional framework will be judged by the quality of the exercise, we should like to put the following questions to the Commission:
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni, katere so glavne spremembe, s katerimi bi se izognili lanskoletnemu neuspehu pri izvajanju testa izjemnih situacij v bančništvu?
Can the Commission explain the main changes to make in order to avoid a failure of the banking stress test exercise as there was last year?
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni, zakaj se ni bolj pregledno poročalo o stopnji izpostavljenosti bank državnemu dolgu ali dolgovom drugih bank?
Can the Commission explain what justification there is for not giving a more transparent account of the level of exposure of banks to specific sovereign debt or to the debts of other banks?
Zakaj testi izjemnih situacij ne vključujejo najbolj črnih scenarijev?
What are the reasons for not including the most adverse scenarios in the stress tests?
Kdaj bo Komisija predložila strategijo za dokapitalizacijo in po potrebi preoblikovanje evropskega bančnega sektorja, ki bo med drugim obravnavala možne čezmejne stranske učinke slabečih finančnih ustanov, kot je to predlagal Parlament v Ferreirovem poročilu o kriznem upravljanju v bančnem sektorju in sveženj finančnega nadzora?
When will the Commission come forward with a strategy to recapitalise and, if necessary, restructure the European banking sector, which deals, among other issues, with possible cross-border spillover effects of ailing financial institutions as proposed by Parliament in the Ferreira report on crisis management in the banking sector and the Financial Supervisory Package?
Če Komisija ne namerava predložiti takega načrta, ali lahko pojasni zakaj?
If the Commission does not intend to propose such a plan, can it state why?
Kakšne alternativne rešitve ima v načrtu?
What kind of alternative solutions does it envisage?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000075/2011/rev.1
Question for oral answer O-000075/2011/rev.1
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Odziv na migracijske tokove v severni Afriki in južnem Sredozemlju
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Response to the migration flows in North Africa and the southern Mediterranean
Val političnih revolucij v severni Afriki spremljajo tudi migracijski tokovi, saj ljudje bežijo pred nestabilnostjo in nasiljem.
The wave of political revolution in North Africa has been accompanied by migration flows as people flee instability and violence.
V posebnem primeru Libije so sedanje razmere povzročile velika gibanja beguncev, ki bežijo iz te države.
In the particular case of Libya, the current situation has resulted in large movements of refugees fleeing from that country.
V skladu z mnenjem, med drugim UNHCR in IOM, so "zmogljivosti sprejema" obmejnih držav Alžirije, Tunizije in Egipta že dosegle svoje meje, zaradi nevarnih notranjih razmer v obmejnih državah Čadu, Nigerju in Sudanu pa se zdi regionalni sprejem beguncev v teh državah skoraj nemogoč.
The ‘reception capacity’ of the bordering countries Algeria, Tunisia and Egypt has already reached its limits according to, inter alia , the UNHCR and IOM and, due to the dangerous internal situation in the bordering countries Chad, Niger and Sudan, regional reception of refugees in these countries should be deemed virtually impossible.
Poleg tega se poroča tudi, naj bi približno 7000 tunizijskih in 300 libijskih beguncev prispelo na obalo Lampeduse.
Furthermore some 7 000 Tunisians and 300 Libyan refugees are also reported to have arrived on the shores of Lampedusa.
Ali lahko, glede na to, da ta gibanja povzročajo pritisk na solidarnost tako do sosednjih držav kakor v Evropski uniji, Svet pojasni:
Given that these movements put solidarity under pressure both towards neighbouring countries and within the EU, can the Council clarify the following?
Kaj namerava storiti, da bi pomagal državam na tem območju, kot sta Tunizija in Egipt, pri obvladovanju razmer in pri podpori tistim, ki ne morejo zapustiti regije in bi lahko potrebovali mednarodno zaščito, ter tistim, ki jih je UNHCR že priznal kot begunce, zlasti prebivalcem podsaharske Afrike?
What does it plan to do to help the countries of the region, such as Tunisia and Egypt, to manage the situation and support those who are blocked in the region, i.e. those who could require international protection and those already recognised as refugees by the UNHCR, notably Sub-Saharans?
Ali so države članice v Svetu pripravljene zahtevati od Komisije, da predstavi predlog za potrditev sklepa Sveta, ki določa "obstoj množičnega prihoda razseljenih oseb", kakor določa člen 5 direktive o začasni zaščiti iz leta 2001?
Are there Member States in the Council prepared to make a request to the Commission to present a proposal to authorise a Council Decision establishing ‘the existence of a mass influx of displaced persons’, as stipulated in Article 5 of the Temporary Protection Directive 2001?
Če tega ne namerava storiti, ali lahko Svet navede, zakaj zavzema stališče, da trenutne razmere v Severni Afriki (Libija) ne sodijo v področje uporabe zgoraj navedene direktive in ali Komisija lahko tudi pojasni, kdaj meni, da razmere sodijo v področje uporabe te direktive?
If not, can the Council then indicate why it holds the opinion that the current situation in North Africa (Libya) does not fall within the scope of the aforementioned Directive, and can the Council then also clarify when it perceives a situation to fall within the scope of this Directive?
Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da se tistim, ki bežijo pred konfliktom, zagotovi priložnost, da zaprosijo za mednarodno zaščito?
How will the Council ensure that those fleeing the conflict are given the opportunity to claim international protection?
– Kaj namerava storiti, da bi vzpostavil učinkovitejše solidarnostne mehanizme med državami članicami, da bi omogočili ponovno naselitev tistih, ki bežijo pred konfliktom in prihajajo v Sredozemsko območje?
– What does it intend to do to establish more systematic solidarity mechanisms among Member States in order to resettle those fleeing the conflict and arriving in the Mediterranean region?
– Kaj namerava dolgoročno storiti, da zagotovi vzpostavitev skupnega azilnega sistema EU do leta 2012?
– In the longer term, what does it intend to do to ensure that the EU common asylum system becomes a reality by 2012?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000076/2011/rev.1
Question for oral answer O-000076/2011/rev.1
V skladu z mnenjem, med drugim UNHCR in IOM, so "zmogljivosti sprejema" obmejnih držav Alžirije, Tunizije in Egipta že dosegle svoje meje, zaradi nevarnih notranjih razmer v obmejnih državah Čadu, Nigerju in Sudanu pa se zdi regionalni sprejem beguncev v teh državah skoraj nemogoč.
The ‘reception capacity’ of the bordering countries Algeria, Tunisia and Egypt has already reached its limits according to, inter alia, the UNHCR and IOM and, due to the dangerous internal situation in the bordering countries Chad, Niger and Sudan, regional reception of refugees in these countries should be deemed virtually impossible.
Poleg tega se poroča tudi, naj bi približno 7000 tunizijskih in 300 libijskih beguncev prispelo na obalo Lampeduse.
Furthermore, some 7 000 Tunisians and 300 Libyan refugees are also reported to have arrived on the shores of Lampedusa.
Ali lahko, glede na to, da ta gibanja povzročajo pritisk na solidarnost tako do sosednjih držav kakor v Evropski uniji, Komisija pojasni:
Given that these movements put solidarity under pressure both towards neighbouring countries and within the EU, can the Commission clarify the following?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena predstaviti predlog za potrditev sklepa Sveta, ki določa "obstoj množičnega prihoda razseljenih oseb", kakor določa člen 5 direktive o začasni zaščiti iz leta 2001?
Is the Commission prepared to present a proposal to authorise a Council Decision establishing ‘the existence of a mass influx of displaced persons’, as stipulated in Article 5 of the Temporary Protection Directive 2001?
Če tega ne namerava storiti, ali lahko Komisija navede, zakaj zavzema stališče, da trenutne razmere v Severni Afriki (Libija) ne sodijo v področje uporabe zgoraj navedene direktive in ali Komisija lahko tudi pojasni, kdaj meni, da razmere sodijo v področje uporabe te direktive?
If not, can the Commission then indicate why it holds the opinion that the current situation in North Africa (Libya) does not fall within the scope of the aforementioned Directive, and can the Commission then also clarify when it perceives a situation to fall within the scope of this Directive?
Kaj namerava storiti, da bi pomagala državam na tem območju, kot sta Tunizija in Egipt, pri obvladovanju razmer in pri podpori tistim, ki ne morejo zapustiti regije in bi lahko potrebovali mednarodno zaščito, ter tistim, ki jih je UNHCR že priznal kot begunce, zlasti prebivalcem podsaharske Afrike?
What does it plan to do to help the countries of the region, such as Tunisia and Egypt, to manage the situation and support those who are blocked in the region, i.e. those who could require international protection and those already recognised as refugees by the UNHCR, notably Sub-Saharans?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se tistim, ki bežijo pred konfliktom, zagotovi možnost, da zaprosijo za mednarodno zaščito?
How will the Commission ensure that those fleeing the conflict are given the opportunity to claim international protection?
– Kaj namerava storiti glede na izjemno ranljiv položaj mladoletnikov brez spremstva, ki naj bi prišli na Lampeduso, da se zagotovi ustrezna zaščita te skupine?
– Given the particularly vulnerable situation of the unaccompanied minors reported to have arrived in Lampedusa, what does it intend to do to ensure the adequate protection of this group?
– Kaj namerava storiti glede premestitve in ponovne naselitve oseb, ki bežijo pred konfliktom, v EU in v različnih državah članicah, zlasti glede prosilcev, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito?
– What does it intend to do as regards relocation and resettlement in the EU of those fleeing the conflict and between the various Member States, particularly regarding applicants that require international protection?
– Kaj namerava storiti, da bi vzpostavila učinkovitejše solidarnostne mehanizme med državami članicami, da bi omogočili ponovno naselitev tistih, ki bežijo pred konfliktom in prihajajo v Sredozemsko območje?
– What does it intend to do to establish more systematic solidarity mechanisms among Member States in order to resettle those fleeing the conflict who arrive in the Mediterranean region?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000077/2011
Question for oral answer O-000077/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Prenova madžarske ustave
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Revision of the Hungarian Constitution
Madžarske oblasti so Parlamentu predložile osnutek ustave, ki med drugim omejuje pooblastila ustavnega sodišča; spreminja trajanje mandata članov ustavnega sodišča, predsednika računskega sodišča in guvernerja centralne banke; opredeljuje zakonsko zvezo in družino na način, ki izključuje enostarševske družine, zunajzakonske zveze in istospolne pare; prepoveduje diskriminacijo, razen na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti, starosti in genetskih značilnosti; odloča, da je „življenje zarodka“ „zaščiteno od trenutka spočetja“; ukinja in združuje organe za človekove pravice; vsebuje verska sklicevanja na krščanstvo in njegovo vlogo pri ohranjanju madžarske nacionalne zavesti; predvideva možnost, da bi mladoletnikom ali njihovim materam dodelili dodatne glasove.
The Hungarian authorities have submitted to Parliament a draft Constitution in which, among other things, the Constitutional Court’s powers are limited; the terms of office of the Constitutional Court members, President of the Court of Auditors and Central Bank Governor are modified; marriage and the family are defined as excluding single-parent families and cohabiting and same-sex couples; discrimination is prohibited except on grounds of sexual orientation, age and genetic features; ‘the life of the foetus’ is ‘protected from the time of conception’; human rights bodies are abolished and merged; religious references are made to Christianity and its role in preserving Hungary’s nationhood; the possibility to give additional votes to minors or their mothers is provided for.
Prenovi ustave nasprotujejo opozicijske stranke in nevladne organizacije, ki so kritizirale nepreglednost postopka, pomanjkljivost posvetovanj, natrpan urnik ter, z vidika vsebine, odpravo demokratičnega sistema zavor in ravnovesij.
The reform of the Constitution is contested by opposition parties and NGOs, which have criticised the process for not being transparent, for the inadequate consultation and for the tight schedule, as well as, in terms of content, for the dismantling of democratic checks and balances.
Evropska komisija za demokracijo skozi pravo (Beneška komisija) je madžarske oblasti pozvala, naj povečajo prožnost, odprtost ter pripravljenost za sklepanje kompromisov, ter pripravila priporočila, Parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope pa je madžarske oblasti 25. marca pozvala, naj objavijo celovito mnenje.
The European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) has called on the Hungarian authorities to increase flexibility, openness and the spirit of compromise and made recommendations, while PACE called it on 25 March to issue a fully fledged opinion.
Osnutek ustave naj bi bil predvidoma sprejet v drugi polovici aprila.
The draft Constitution is scheduled to be adopted in the second half of April.
Ali Svet spremlja postopek prenove madžarske ustave ter preverja, ali so predlagane spremembe v skladu s pogodbami in pravom EU, zlasti s členi 2, 6 in 7 Pogodbe o EU, ter s skupnimi demokratičnimi ustavnimi načeli?
Is the Council following the reform process of the Hungarian Constitution to check if the proposed reforms are in conformity with the EU Treaties and law and notably with Articles 2, 6 and 7 TEU and common democratic constitutional principles?
Kakšna je njegova ocena in katere ukrepe bo sprejel?
What is its assessment and what action will it take?
Ali meni, da bi utegnilo zaradi teh sprememb priti do tveganja za diskriminacijo na podlagi narodnostne in etnične pripadnosti, spolne usmerjenosti, vere ali prepričanja ali do kršitev načela enake obravnave?
Does it believe that these changes could create a risk of discrimination on the basis of nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion or belief and violate the principle of equal treatment?
Ali bo pozval madžarske oblasti, naj počakajo mnenje Beneške komisije ter pred sprejetjem osnutka ustave izpolnijo njena priporočila?
Will it call on the Hungarian authorities to await the Venice Commission opinion and follow its recommendations before adopting the draft Constitution?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000078/2011
Question for oral answer O-000078/2011
Madžarske oblasti so Parlamentu predložile osnutek ustave, ki med drugim omejuje pooblastila ustavnega sodišča; spreminja trajanje mandata članov ustavnega sodišča, predsednika računskega sodišča in guvernerja centralne banke; opredeljuje zakonsko zvezo in družino na način, ki izključuje enostarševske družine, zunajzakonske zveze in istospolne pare; prepoveduje diskriminacijo, razen na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti, starosti in genetskih značilnosti; odloča, da je „življenje zarodka“ „zaščiteno od trenutka spočetja“; ukinja in združuje organe za človekove pravice; vsebuje verska sklicevanja na krščanstvo in njegovo vlogo pri ohranjanju madžarske nacionalne zavesti; predvideva možnost, da bi mladoletnikom ali njihovim materam dodelili dodatne glasove.
The Hungarian authorities have submitted to Parliament a draft Constitution in which, among other things, the Constitutional Court’s powers are limited; the terms of office of the Constitutional Court members, President of the Court of Auditors and Central Bank Governor are modified; marriage and the family are defined as excluding single-parent families and cohabiting and same-sex couples; discrimination is prohibited except on grounds of sexual orientation, age and genetic features; ‘the life of the foetus’ is ‘protected from the time of conception’; human rights bodies are abolished and merged; religious references are made to Christianity and its role in preserving Hungary’s nationhood; the possibility to give additional votes to minors or their mothers is foreseen.
Ali Komisija spremlja postopek prenove madžarske ustave ter preverja, ali so predlagane spremembe v skladu s pogodbami in pravom EU, zlasti s členi 2, 6 in 7 Pogodbe o EU, ter s skupnimi demokratičnimi ustavnimi načeli?
Is the Commission following the reform process of the Hungarian Constitution to check if the proposed reforms are in conformity with the EU Treaties and law and notably with Articles 2, 6 and 7 TEU, and common democratic constitutional principles?
Kakšna je njena ocena in katere ukrepe bo sprejela?
What is its assessment and what action will it take?
Ali bo pozvala madžarske oblasti, naj počakajo mnenje Beneške komisije ter pred sprejetjem osnutka ustave izpolnijo njena priporočila?
Will it call on the Hungarian authorities to await the Venice Commission opinion and follow its recommendations before adopting the draft Constitution?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000079/2011
Question for oral answer O-000079/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Prenova madžarske ustave
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Revision of the Hungarian Constitution
Madžarske oblasti so Parlamentu predložile osnutek ustave, ki: ne vsebuje opredelitve socialnih pravic: v novo ustavo je treba v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi Madžarske med temeljne pravice vključiti tudi socialne pravice.
The Hungarian authorities have submitted to Parliament a draft Constitution which: lacks a definition of social rights: social rights should be included in the new Constitution among fundamental rights, in line with Hungary’s international commitments.
Osnutek ustave ne zagotavlja pravice do državne podpore starejšim državljanom.
The draft Constitution does not guarantee the right to state support for elderly citizens.
Vsebuje omejujočo in nazadnjaško opredelitev družine: osnutek ustave bo domnevno zaščitil zakonsko zvezo kot zvezo med moškim in žensko ter ščitil in podpiral družine izključno na podlagi te zveze.
It gives a restrictive, conservative definition of the family: the draft Constitution will supposedly protect marriage as a union between a man and a woman and will protect and support families based exclusively on this union.
Enostarševske družine in pari, ki živijo v zunajzakonski zvezi, tako ne bodo deležni enake zaščite, pri čemer gre za diskriminacijo, saj bi morala ustava zagotoviti enako raven zaščite vsem družinam, ne glede na zakonski stan ali spol staršev.
Thus, no single-parent families or cohabiting couples will enjoy the same protection, and they will therefore be discriminated against, whereas the Constitution should provide the same level of protection for all families, irrespective of the marital status or sex of the parents.
Ne vsebuje omembe prepovedi pravnega učinkovanja za nazaj: osnutek ustave ne prepoveduje pravnega učinkovanja zakonodaje za nazaj z negativnimi posledicami za državljane.
There is no reference to the prohibition of legal retroactive effect: the draft Constitution does not prohibit the retroactive effect of legislation with negative consequences for the subjects.
Na področju zaščite embrionalnega življenja bi lahko nova ustava, s tem ko bi zaščitila življenje od trenutka spočetja, privedla do prepovedi splavov, čeprav jih v tej fazi odkrito ne prepoveduje.
On the protection of embryonic life, the new Constitution may, through the protection of life from the moment of conception, lead to a ban on abortion, even if it does not openly prohibit it at this stage.
Ustava glede omejevanja temeljnih pravic v izrednih razmerah ne vsebuje zagotovila, da v takšnih razmerah ni mogoče omejiti najosnovnejših temeljnih pravic.
On limiting fundamental rights in a state of emergency, there is no guarantee in the draft constitution that the most fundamental rights cannot be limited during a state of emergency.
To je v primerjavi s sedanjo ustavo velik korak nazaj.
This is a major step back in comparison with the present Constitution.
Ustavnemu sodišču niso bile povrnjene pravice: v odgovor na nedavno sodbo ustavnega sodišča je vladajoča stranka Fidesz temu organu omejila pravico do pregleda vse zakonodaje.
The rights of the Constitutional Court have not been restored: in response to a recent ruling of the Constitutional Court, the Fidesz majority has restricted the body's right to review any legislation.