natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni in navede zagotovila, zakaj se vsebina priloge, ki je za posameznika zavezujoča, hrani kot tajna, in s tem krši demokratično načelo javnosti zakonov?
Can the Commission explain and provide assurances on why the contents of the annex, which has binding effects on individual persons, are kept secret, in breach of the democratic principle of publicity of laws?
Kako lahko posameznik na licu mesta ali kasneje spodbija odločbo ali kazen in se pritoži, če je predpis tajen?
How can a person contest the decision or a sanction, on the spot or at a later stage, and look for legal remedy, if the rule is secret?
Zakaj uporaba ukrepov ni usklajena in prepuščena diskrecijski pravici držav članic ter upravam in varnostnim službam letališč?
Why is the application of the measure not harmonised and left to the discretionary powers of Member States, airport authorities and security services?
Bo Evropska komisija ocenila praktične posledice ukrepov na posameznike, na njihove pravice ter na izvajanje storitev na letališču (pregledovanje prtljage, prestopanje itd.) ter o tem obvestila javnost in EP?
Will the European Commission evaluate and inform the public and the EP on the practical consequences of the measure on individuals and their rights, as well as on airport land services management (checked luggage, connecting flights, etc...)?
Ali obstajajo kategorije ljudi ali VIP, ki so lahko izvzete iz teh pravil, tudi kadar potujejo s komercialnimi leti?
Are there categories of persons or VIPs, who when flying on commercial flights can be exempted from these rules?
Ali bo Komisija pregledala ukrep, da se bo učila iz izkušenj pri njegovem izvajanju, in obravnavala omenjena vprašanja ter problem odvzema predmetov potnikom, ki potujejo čez ozemlje EU?
Will the Commission review the measure, so as to learn from experience in its application and to tackle the aforementioned issues, as well as the problem of the seizure of items from travellers in transit on EU territory?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da uporabljeni postopek komitologije ne omogoča ustreznega parlamentarnega in sodnega nadzora, kar je kršitev demokratičnih načel in evropskih standardov?
Does it agree that the comitology procedure applied does not allow for proper parliamentary and judicial control, in breach of democratic principles and European standards?
UL L 286, 17.10.2006, str.
OJ L 286, 17.10.2006, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0013/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0013/07
Zadeva: Nezakonit lov na ptice na Malti
Subject: Illegal bird hunting in Malta
Kljub temu, da je Komisija proti Malti sprožila postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev, in kljub priporočilom, ki jih je Odbor za peticije pripravil maja po obisku za ugotavljanje dejstev, namerava malteška vlada odobriti lov na divje ptice v letošnjem spomladanskem obdobju, kot je to storila že vsako leto od vstopa Malte v EU leta 2004.
Despite the launching of the infringement proceedings against Malta by the Commission and the recommendations made by the Petitions Committee following a fact-finding visit last May , the Maltese Government is preparing to authorise the hunting of wild birds during spring 2007, as it has done annually since it joined the EU in 2004.
Katere nujne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Evropska komisija za to, da bi prepričala malteške oblasti, da dejansko prepovedo lov na divje ptice, zlasti med pomladansko selitveno sezono, glede na to, da je med pticami, ki jih lovijo (vključno z ujedami, kot je ribji orel), veliko ogroženih vrst?
What urgent measures does the Commission plan to take in order to persuade the Maltese authorities to effectively outlaw the practice of hunting wild birds in the spring migration season in particular, given that many birds hunted, including birds of prey such as osprey, are endangered species?
Kako namerava Komisija zavezati malteško vlado k spoštovanju njenih obveznosti ter k ustreznemu izvajanju in izvrševanju direktive o pticah (79/409/EGS )?
How does the Commission intend to oblige the Maltese Government to respect its commitments and to properly implement and enforce the Birds Directive (79/409/EEC )?
Osnutek poročila o obisku za ugotavljanje dejstev na Malti, 9.–12. maj 2006, FdR DT\619183 (PE 374.415).
Draft report on the fact-finding visit to Malta, 9-12 May 2006, fdr DT\619183 (PE 374.415).
UL L 103, 25.4.1979, str.
OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0014/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0014/07
Zadeva: Sorazmernost med lastništvom in nadzorom v evropskih družbah, ki kotirajo na borzi
Subject: Proportionality between ownership and control in EU listed companies
ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 4. julija 2006 (P6_TA PROV(2006)0259) o nedavnem razvoju dogodkov in nadaljnjih možnostih v zvezi s pravom družb (2006/2051(INI)) ter resolucije z dne 21. aprila 2004 ,
Having regard to Parliament’s resolutions of 4 July 2006 ( P6_TA(2006)0295 ) on recent developments and prospects in relation to company law (2006/2051(INI)) and of 21 April 2004 ,
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o izvajanju direktive o ponudbah za prevzem (SEC(2007)0268) z dne 21. februarja 2007,
having regard to the Commission’s report on the implementation of the Directive on Takeover Bids of 21 February 2007 (SEC(2007)0268),
ob upoštevanju zbirnega poročila Komisije o posvetovanju o prihodnjih prednostnih nalogah za akcijski načrt o posodabljanju prava družb in izboljšanju upravljanja podjetij v Evropski uniji,
having regard to the Commission’s summary report on the consultation and hearing on future priorities for the action plan on modernising company law and enhancing corporate governance in the European Union,
ker je Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji 4. julija 2006 ( P6_TA(2006)0295 ) o nedavnem razvoju dogodkov in nadaljnjih možnostih v zvezi s pravom družb (2006/2051(INI)) izrazil pričakovanje, "da bo Komisija po potrebi pripravila zakonodajni predlog o načelu 'ena delnica – en glas' šele po končani reviziji direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/25/ES z dne 21. aprila 2004 o ponudbah za prevzem , kot je predvideno v členu 20 te direktive, in oceni te direktive".
whereas in its resolution of 4 July 2006 ( P6_TA(2006)0295 ) on recent developments and prospects in relation to company law (2006/2051(INI)) the Parliament expressed its expectation ‘that the Commission will, if appropriate make a legislative proposal concerning the principle ”one share one vote” only after the outcome of the revision of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids , as provided for in Article 20 of that directive, and an evaluation of that directive’,
UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
UL L 142, 30.4.2004, str.
OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0015/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0015/07
Zadeva: Via Baltica
Subject: Via Baltica
Ali lahko Komisija potrdi, da so poljske oblasti, kljub začetku postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev proti Poljski decembra 2006, dale zeleno luč za graditev avtoceste Via Baltica po dolini reke Rospuda in skozi pragozd Augustov, ki je območje, vključeno v Naturo 2000?
Can the Commission confirm that despite the initiation of infringement proceedings against Poland in December 2006, the Polish authorities have given the go-ahead to the construction of the Via Baltica through the Rospuda Valley in the Augustow Primeval Forest Natura 2000 site?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi morala do izida postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev gradbena dela na tem projektu biti ustavljena, glede na postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki potekajo, in glede na številne peticije (vključno s peticijo 350/2006), ki jih je prejel Evropski parlament od evropskih državljanov in organizacij, ki so zaskrbljeni, da ta projekt lahko krši direktive o pticah in habitatih, dokler ne bo jasno ugotovljeno, da Poljska ne krši omenjenih direktiv?
Does the Commission agree, given the on-going infringement proceedings and the many petitions (including petition 350/2006) received by the European Parliament from European citizens and associations concerned that this project is potentially in violation of the Birds and Habitats Directives, that pending the outcome of the infringement proceedings, construction works for this project should be suspended until it is clearly established that Poland is not in breach of the said Directives?
Kakšne nujne konkretne ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela, da zagotovi, da bo Poljska spoštovala svoje obveznosti do EU, kar zadeva projekt Via Baltica?
What concrete actions will the Commission urgently take to ensure Poland respects her EU obligations when it comes to the Via Baltica project?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0016/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0016/07
Zadeva: Namestitev ameriških obrambnih sistemov proti izstrelkom v državah članicah EU
Subject: Installation of American anti-missile system in EU Member States
Evropsko javno mnenje se je odzvalo na novico o načrtih ZDA za namestitev obrambnih sistemov proti izstrelkom v državah Evropske unije (na Poljskem in v Češki republiki) pod pretvezo, da želi zagotoviti zaščito pred napadi z izstrelki iz Irana in Severne Koreje, saj meni, da bi s tem Evropa postala tarča in se na novo razdelila.
The USA's plans to install an anti-missile system in Member States of the European Union - Poland and the Czech Republic - on the pretext of providing protection against missile attacks from Iran and North Korea has alarmed European public opinion, which perceives such plans as making Europe a target and at the same time creating new divisions.
Po izjavah ruskega varnostnega sveta ruska obrambna politika te načrte že natančno raziskuje, saj meni, da ogrožajo Rusko federacijo.
According to an announcement by the Russian Security Council, these plans are already prompting a revision of Russian defence policy, as they are considered to be a threat to the Russian Federation.
Kakšno je stališče Sveta o namestitvi omenjenih sistemov v državah članicah Evropske unije?
What view does the Council take of the installation of these systems in Member States of the European Union?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti, da bodo preklicani tovrstni načrti, ki spominjajo na obujanje hladne vojne in prispevajo k utrditvi svetovne mreže vojaškega nadzora?
What measures will it take to ensure the cancellation of these plans, which are reviving the Cold War scenario in Europe and helping to consolidate a worldwide network of military control?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0017/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0017/07
Zadeva: Zgodnje odkrivanje in zdravljenje raka prostate v razširjeni Evropski uniji
Subject: Early detection and treatment of prostate cancer in the enlarged European Union
Kljub temu, da je rak prostate najbolj pogosto diagnosticirana oblika raka pri moških, ki je zaradi rasti pričakovane življenjske dobe prebivalstva in razširjene uporabe diagnostične biopsije vsako leto bolj pogosta, so redke države članice izvajale ali priporočile nacionalne postopke pregledovanja za upravljanje tega trenda v okviru nacionalnega načrta za nadzorovanje raka.
Given the fact that prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed form of cancer in men, increasing each year due to the growing life expectancy of the population and the widespread use of diagnostic biopsies, few Member States have implemented or recommended national screening procedures to guide this trend into a national cancer control plan.
Zaradi pomanjkanja preventivnih dejavnosti je v zadnjem desetletju v večini držav stopnja umrljivosti ostala nespremenjena, na drugem ali tretjem mestu pri moških, in bila razširjena pri več kot 2 milijonih v Evropski uniji.
This lack of preventive organisation kept the mortality rates, second or third in men in most countries, unchanged over the last decade and resulted in a prevalence figure of above 2 million in the European Union.
Združen dejavnik je anamneza raka prostate, ki ga je mogoče zaslediti že med dvajsetim in tridesetim letom življenja in je zaradi njega prizadetih 30 do 50% vseh moških po svetu, vrhunec pa doseže med šestdesetim in sedemdesetim letom, vendar na srečo privede do kliničnega, simptomatičnega raka z mogočo umrljivostjo pri približno 10% moških.
A compounding factor is the natural history of prostate cancer that can be found as early as the third decade of life, affecting 30 to 50% of all men worldwide, to reach a zenith in the seventh decade, but fortunately leads to a clinical, symptomatic cancer with possible mortality in approximately 10% of men.
Poleg tega je v številnih primerih potrebnih 20 let, da začetni mikroskopski subklinični tumorji dosežejo velikost kliničnega odkrivanja, po odkritju pa je lahko potrebnih deset do petnajst let bolezni, preden ti dosežejo končno smrtno fazo.
Moreover in many cases it takes up to 20 years for initial subclinical microscopic tumours to reach the size of clinical detection; and after detection 10 to 15 years of disease may be possible before they reach the final lethal stage.
Ali je Komisija pripravljena sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi pridobila najnovejše in natančne podatke o pogostosti pojavljanja, nedavnem porastu, zgodnjem odkrivanju, zdravljenju in razširjenosti te oblike raka v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije?
Is the Commission willing to take all necessary steps to obtain current and accurate data on incidence, its recent rise, early detection, treatment and prevalence in all Member States of the European Union?
Ali bo Komisija v sedmem okvirnem programu upoštevala obstoječo izredno razliko v stopnji umrljivosti med južno in severno Evropo, saj ta ponuja enkratno priložnost za preučevanje okoljskih in prehrambenih dejavnikov, ki spodbujajo ali zavirajo rast raka prostate?
Will the Commission take into account in the Seventh Framework Programme the existing remarkable difference in mortality between southern and northern Europe, offering a unique opportunity to study environmental and diet factors that promote or inhibit the growth of prostate cancer?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena pospešiti analize rezultatov edinih dveh randomiziranih preglednih raziskav o raku prostate, vseevropsko raziskavo ERSPC (European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer) in raziskavo Protect Study v Združenem kraljestvu, ki naj bi bili na voljo leta 2009 oziroma 2013, da bi zagotovila znanstveno osnovo za politične odločitve o pregledovanju prebivalstva za odrivanje raka na prostati?
Is the Commission willing to speed up the analysis of the results of the only two randomised screening trials for prostate cancer, the pan European ERSPC and the Protect Study of the UK, respectively expected by 2009 and 2013 to secure a scientific base for policy decisions on prostate cancer population screening?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena in sposobna obveščati prebivalstvo o dejstvu, da mogoče za polovico vseh primerov raka prostate, ki so bili novo odkriti s pomočjo preiskav prostatičnega specifičnega antigena (PSA), ni potrebno zdravljenje ter bi bilo zanje diagnostično spremljanje boljše kot zdravljenje?
Is the Commission willing and able to inform the population of the fact that maybe half of all newly detected prostate cancer on the basis of the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test, without other indications of disease, do not need treatment and may be best served by diagnostic follow-up rather than over-treatment?
Kako namerava Komisija pripomoči k prehodu od obstoječih preiskav PSA z omejeno natančnostjo diagnosticiranja k bolj natančnemu označevalcu za diagnoze in prognoze?
How does the Commission intend to assist in the transition from the current PSA test, with its limited accuracy for diagnosis, to a more accurate marker for diagnosis and prognosis?
Kako bo Komisija podpirala ozaveščenost o dejstvu, da je treba pri primerih raka prostate in raka dojke v družini pri bližnjih sorodnikih začeti z zgodnjim diagnostičnimi preiskavami po 40. letu?
How will the Commission support awareness of the fact that familial prostate and breast cancer in close relatives calls for early diagnostic screening from the age of 40?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0018/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0018/07
Zadeva: Ključni cilji za konferenco pogodbenic Konvencije o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi prosto živečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami (CITES) v Haagu od 3. do 15. junija 2007
Subject: Key objectives for the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) to be held in The Hague on 3-15 June 2007
Ali lahko Svet pojasni, kateri so ključni strateški cilji Evropske unije na bližnji konferenci pogodbenic Konvencije o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi prosto živečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami (CITES), ki bo potekala v Haagu od 3. do 15. junija 2007?
Can the Council explain the key strategic objectives for the European Union at the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) that will be held in The Hague on 3-15 June 2007.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0020/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0020/07
Zadeva: Finančne perspektive urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu
Subject: The financial perspectives of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
Komisija je pripravila sporočilo (KOM(2006)0865 končno) o finančnih perspektivah urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (blagovne znamke in modeli) (v nadaljevanju: urad), kjer je napovedala, da namerava spremeniti Uredbo (ES) št. 1042/2005 z dne 29. junija 2005 o pristojbinah, ki se plačujejo temu uradu.
Having regard to the Communication from the Commission COM(2006)0865 final on the Financial Perspectives of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ('the Office'), where the Commission announced the intention to modify Regulation (EC) No 1042/2005 of 29 June 2005 on the fees payable to the Office:
Ob upoštevanju, da so blagovne znamke in modeli v Evropi zaščiteni dvojno, tako z nacionalnimi predpisi kot s predpisi Skupnosti, ali lahko Komisija pripravi celovit pristop k razvoju te zaščite v EU in njenemu pomenu v prihodnje?
Taking into account that the protection of trade marks and designs in Europe is based on the dual system of national and Community protection, could the Commission provide for a global approach on the future development of the protection of trade marks and designs within the EU and its meaning?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni predlagani mehanizem rednega pregledovanja in prilagajanja pristojbin urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu?
Can the Commission clarify the proposed mechanism of regular review and adaptation of the fees in use at the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market?
Ker gre za bistvene vidike sistema pristojbin, ali se Komisija ne strinja, da bi bila sprememba Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 40/94 z dne 20. decembra 1993 o znamki Skupnosti učinkovitejša ter da bi omogočila bolj demokratičen in pregleden nadzor kakor revizija pristojbin, ki bi se opravljala z izvedbenimi ukrepi?
Given that essential aspects of the fees system are at stake, does the Commission not agree that a proposal amending Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark would be more effective and benefit from a more democratic and transparent scrutiny than a review of the fees operated through implementing measures?
Ker namerava Komisija pripraviti predloge za spremembo svoje uredbe o pristojbinah, pospremljene z ustrezno presojo vpliva, ali ne bi razmislila tudi o presoji vpliva zmanjšanja pristojbin na razvoj nacionalnih uradov za blagovne znamke in modele?
Taking into account that the Commission intends to present proposals for an amendment of the Commission's Fee Regulation accompanied by a proportionate impact assessment, would the Commission also consider the impact assessment of the fees reduction in the future development of the national trade marks and designs offices?
Glede na to, da je sistem dvojne zaščite namenjen tudi zaščiti evropskih malih in srednjih podjetij, ali je Komisija pretehtala posledice morebitne slabitve nacionalnih uradov za blagovne znamke in modele za usodo malih in srednjih podjetij?
Taking into account that this dual system is designed to protect SMEs in Europe, has the Commission considered the consequences for SMEs of any weakening of the national offices of trade marks and designs?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bo urad presežek proračunskih sredstev, ki se je nabral doslej, porabil na najboljši način?
What measures does the Commission intend to adopt in order to allow the Office to allocate the surpluses accumulated so far in the best possible manner?
Ali tega presežka ne bi bilo mogoče porabiti za usposabljanje, izobraževanje in ozaveščanje na področju mednarodne zaščite evropskih blagovnih znamk in modelov?
Could the Commission consider the possibility of using such budgetary surpluses for training, education and awareness-raising programmes in the area of the international protection of European trade marks and designs?
Kako je Komisija ocenila učinkovitost sistema blagovnih znamk in modelov Skupnosti?
What assessment has the Commission made of the effectiveness of the Community system for Community trade marks and designs?
Natančneje, ali je po njenem mnenju postopek registracije dovolj strog, da so pravne posledice za podjetja po registraciji čim manjše?
In particular has the Commission considered the registration process as sufficiently rigorous to minimise legal implications for companies post-registration?
UL L 172, 5.7.2005, str.
OJ L 172, 5.7.2005, p.
UL L 11, 14.1.1994, str.
OJ L 11, 14.1.1994, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0022/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0022/07
Zadeva: Odstopanje od pravil notranjega trga za javna naročila za obrambo na podlagi člena 296 Pogodbe o ES
Subject: Derogations to internal market rules for defence procurement on the basis of Art. 296 TEC
V njem je pojasnjen obstoječi pravni okvir in našteti pogoji, pod katerimi so odstopanja dovoljena.
This communication helped clarify the existing legal framework and specified under which conditions the derogations are allowed to apply.
Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov nadalje ugotavlja, da Komisija pripravlja predlog nove zakonodaje, ki naj bi znatno pripomogla k vzpostavitvi konkurenčnejšega okolja za evropsko obrambno industrijo in njene dobavitelje.
The IMCO Committee further notes efforts by the Commission to propose new legislation which should substantially contribute to creating a more competitive environment for the European defence industry and its suppliers.
Predvsem poudarja pomembno vlogo, ki jo imajo javna naročila za obrambo v evropskem gospodarstvu.
It highlights in particular the important role of defence procurement for the European economy.
Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov Evropski komisiji zastavlja naslednja vprašanja:
The IMCO Committee asks the European Commission the following questions.
Kakšen je napredek pri pripravi direktive o javnih naročilih za obrambno opremo, za katero ne veljajo odstopanja iz člena 296 Pogodbe o ES?
What is the progress on the directive on the 'procurement of defence equipment not subject to the derogations of Art. 296 TEC' which is being drafted?
Kateri so naslednji koraki, ki jih načrtuje Komisija?
What are the subsequent steps planned by the Commission?
Kako Komisija, s stališča poštenega in učinkovitega delovanja notranjega trga, ocenjuje razmere v evropski obrambni industriji, kjer naj bi bilo v različnih državah članicah ogroženo veliko število delovnih mest za visokokvalificirane delavce?
How does the Commission evaluate, from the perspective of a fair and efficient working of the internal market, the situation within the European defence industry, where – in different Member States – a significant number of highly skilled jobs appear to be at risk?
Kakšen učinek naj bi po pričakovanjih Komisije direktiva imela na ta sektor?
What impact does it expect the directive to have on the sector?