natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali se Komisiji zdi umestno in primerno okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju industrijske in intelektualne lastnine?
Does the Commission deem enhanced cooperation in the field of industrial and intellectual property to be appropriate?
Ali Komisija pozdravlja pobude držav članic, v skladu s členom 11 Pogodbe ES o razvijanju okrepljenega sodelovanja pri uredbi o patentu Skupnosti?
Would the Commission welcome Member State initiatives, pursuant to Article 11 of the EC Treaty, with a view to the implementation of enhanced cooperation as regards the Regulation on the Community Patent?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0054/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0054/05
, v imenu Odbora za ustavne zadeve
, on behalf of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs
Zadeva: Institucionalni vidiki Evropske službe za zunanje ukrepanje
Subject: Institutional aspects of the European External Action Service
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se bo pri prihodnjem oblikovanju Evropske službe za zunanje ukrepanje model Skupnosti na področju odnosov s tujino ohranjal in se še naprej razvijal?
How is the Commission going to make sure that, in the shaping of the future European External Action Service (EEAS), the Community model is maintained and further developed in the field of foreign relations?
Kako se lahko ohranja in še naprej razvija administrativna in proračunska oblast, ki jo Komisija, kot izvršilni organ Unije, trenutno izvaja nad službami?
How can the administrative and budgetary authority, which the Commission, as the Union's executive, presently exercises on the services, be maintained and developed?
Kako lahko zagotovimo nadzorno pristojnost Parlamenta?
How can Parliament's powers of scrutiny be guaranteed?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0055/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0055/05
Zadeva: Strategija Sveta na seminarju vladnih strokovnjakov o podnebnih spremembah
Subject: Council's strategy for the Seminar of Governmental Experts on Climate Change
Ali bi Svet lahko pojasnil svoje cilje na prihodnjem seminarju vladnih strokovnjakov, ki bo 16. in 17. maja 2005 v Bonnu?
Could the Council clarify its objectives for the forthcoming Seminar of Governmental Experts, to be held in Bonn on 16-17 May 2005?
Kakšna je strategija Sveta v zvezi z začetkom razprav o obveznostih v obdobju po letu 2012 s podpisnicami Kjotskega protokola, ki niso članice EU?
What is the Council's strategy as regards the launching of discussions with the non-EU contracting parties to the Kyoto Protocol on the post-2012 commitment period?
Kako namerava Svet vključiti Evropski parlament v razprave o strategiji po letu 2012, ki potekajo znotraj EU, in še posebej v opredelitev stališča EU glede tega vprašanja?
How is the Council planning to involve the European Parliament in the ongoing discussions within the EU on the post-2012 strategy and, in particular, with a view to defining the EU position on this issue?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0056/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0056/05
Zadeva: Strategija Komisije na seminarju vladnih strokovnjakov o podnebnih spremembah
Subject: Commission's strategy for the Seminar of Governmental Experts on Climate Change
Ali bi Komisija lahko pojasnila svoje cilje na prihodnjem seminarju vladnih strokovnjakov, ki bo 16. in 17. maja 2005 v Bonnu?
Could the Commission clarify its objectives for the forthcoming Seminar of Governmental Experts, to be held in Bonn on 16-17 May 2005?
Kakšna je strategija Komisije v zvezi z začetkom razprav o obveznostih v obdobju po letu 2012 s podpisnicami Kjotskega protokola, ki niso članice EU?
What is the Commission's strategy as regards the launching of discussions with the non-EU contracting parties to the Kyoto Protocol on the post-2012 commitment period?
Kako namerava Komisija vključiti Evropski parlament v razprave o strategiji po letu 2012, ki potekajo znotraj EU, in še posebej v opredelitev stališča EU glede tega vprašanja?
How is the Commission planning to involve the European Parliament in the ongoing discussions within the EU on the post-2012 strategy and, in particular, with a view to defining the EU position on this issue?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0057/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0057/05
Zadeva: Stališče Sveta o uvedbi davka na devizne transakcije (Tobinovega davka)
Subject: Council position on the introduction of a currency transaction tax (Tobin tax)
V Franciji in Belgiji je bil sprejet davek na devizne transakcije (Tobinov davek), ki ga trenutno preučujejo tudi v Italiji.
Legislation on a currency transaction tax (Tobin tax) has been adopted in France and Belgium, and is being currently considered in Italy.
Ali bo Svet v upoštevanju vse širšega soglasja parlamentov, vlad in civilne družbe glede možnih koristi mednarodnih davkov, kot je Tobinov davek, pojasnil svoje stališče glede tega vprašanja?
In the light of this growing parliamentary, governmental and civil society agreement regarding the potential benefits of international taxes such as the Tobin tax, will the Council outline its own views on the issue?
Ali se bo Svet posebej odzval na predlog o mednarodni obdavčitvi, ki ga je predsednik Chirac podal ob priliki Svetovnega gospodarskega foruma v Davosu na začetku letošnjega leta?
In particular, will the Council respond to President Chirac's proposals on international taxation made in his speech to the World Economic Forum in Davos earlier this year?
Ali namerava Svet podpreti zakonodajne pobude v Franciji in Belgiji o uvedbi Tobinovega davka, ko bo tak davek določen v vseh državah EU, s pozivanjem vseh evropskih držav članic, da sprejmejo podobno nacionalno zakonodajo?
Does the Council intend to support the legislative initiatives in France and Belgium to issue a Tobin tax once such a tax is established in all EU Member States, by calling on all European Member States to approve similar national legislation?
Ali Svet gleda na takšno takso kot na sredstvo za ustvarjanje dohodka, ki bi ga lahko družbeno koristno investirali v okolje, izobraževanje in razvoj povsod po svetu in kot na pomemben prispevek k doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja?
Does the Council see a role for such a tax as a means for generating revenue for socially valuable investment in environment, education and development across the globe, and as an important contribution to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals?
Ali meni, da je lahko takšen davek sredstvo za zmanjševanje špekulacij na deviznih trgih in za stabilizacijo finančnih trgov?
Does it see a role for such a tax in diminishing speculation on value exchanges and in stabilising financial markets?
Bo Svet v zvezi s tem sprejel konkretne ukrepe?
Will the Council therefore take concrete action in this regard?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0058/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0058/05
Zadeva: Stališče Komisije o uvedbi davka na devizne transakcije (Tobinovega davka)
Subject: Commission position on the introduction of a currency transaction tax (Tobin tax)
Ali bo Komisija v upoštevanju vse širšega soglasja parlamentov, vlad in civilne družbe glede možnih koristi mednarodnih davkov, kot je Tobinov davek, pojasnila svoje stališče glede tega vprašanja?
In the light of this growing parliamentary, governmental and civil society agreement regarding the potential benefits of international taxes such as the Tobin tax, will the Commission outline its own views on the issue?
Ali se bo Komisija posebej odzvala na predlog o mednarodni obdavčitvi, ki ga je predsednik Chirac podal ob priliki Svetovnega gospodarskega foruma v Davosu na začetku letošnjega leta?
In particular, will the Commission respond to President Chirac's proposals on international taxation made in his speech to the World Economic Forum in Davos earlier this year?
Ali namerava Komisija podpreti zakonodajne pobude v Franciji in Belgiji o uvedbi Tobinovega davka, ko bo tak davek določen v vseh državah EU, s pozivanjem vseh evropskih držav članic, da sprejmejo podobno nacionalno zakonodajo?
Does the Commission intend to support the legislative initiatives in France and Belgium to issue a Tobin tax once such a tax is established in all EU Member States, by calling on all European Member States to approve similar national legislation?
Ali Komisija gleda na takšno takso kot na sredstvo za ustvarjanje dohodka, ki bi ga lahko družbeno koristno investirali v okolje, izobraževanje in razvoj povsod po svetu in kot na pomemben prispevek k doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja?
Does the Commission see a role for such a tax as a means for generating revenue for socially valuable investment in environment, education and development across the globe, and as an important contribution to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals?
Bo Komisija v zvezi s tem sprejela konkretne ukrepe?
Will the Commission therefore take concrete action in this regard?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0059/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0059/05
Zadeva: Subvencije, dodeljene podjetju Yazaki Group
Subject: Subsidies granted to the Yazaki Group
Multinacionalka Yazaki Group, ki nima svojih tovarn samo na Japonskem, temveč so posejane po celem svetu, vključno z različnimi državami Evropske unije, proizvaja električne materiale, še zlasti pa velja za največjega svetovnega proizvajalca žic, električnih kablov in električnih napeljav za avtomobile.
The multinational Yazaki Group, which has factories not only in Japan but scattered all over the world, including various EU Member States, produces electrical goods, and is specifically the world’s largest manufacturer of wiring, electrical cables and electric connection systems for automobiles.
Trenutno približno 800 delavcem v obeh tovarnah (500 v Ovarju in 300 v kraju Vila Nova de Gaia) grozi s kolektivnim odpuščanjem.
It is currently threatening some 800 workers in the two factories (500 in Ovar and 300 in Vila Nova de Gaia) with collective dismissal.
Zmanjševanje števila delovnih mest dosega s psihološkim pritiskom, z razporejanjem delavcev s poklicnimi boleznimi na posebno proizvodno linijo, ki jo je ustanovilo podjetje in s spreminjanjem delovnega časa, kar povzroča zniževanje plač.
Job reductions are achieved by applying psychological pressure, placing workers with occupational illnesses on a special production line created by the company, and changing working hours with consequent reduction in salaries.
Zahteve po hitrejšem delovnem tempu prispevajo k povečevanju števila poklicnih bolezni (vnetja kitne ovojnice in drugih), ki zaradi nezmožnosti, ki jih povzročajo pri ljudeh, predstavljajo resen socialni problem, a podjetje za to noče prevzeti nikakršne odgovornosti.
The work rate imposed on the employees is contributing to an escalation of occupational illnesses (tendinitis and others) which create a serious social problem due to the incapacity they cause, but the company refuses to take any responsibility.
Vse od napredka, ki je bil nedavno dosežen z volitvami delavcev v Evropski svet delavcev in volitvami predstavnikov v posebno pogajalsko telo, podjetje še ni sklicalo nobenega sestanka s temi predstavniki delavcev.
Since the recent developments involving the election of workers to the European Works Council and of representatives to the Special Negotiating Body, the company has not requested any meetings with these workers’ representatives.
Podjetje medtem nadaljuje s pritiskom glede preklica pogodb o delu, v tovarni kraju Vila Nova de Gaia je pričelo odstranjevati stroje z nekaterih proizvodnih linij ter vztraja pri odpuščanju v Ovarju.
Meanwhile, it is keeping up pressure to rescind job contracts, has begun removing machinery from some of the production lines in the Vila Nova de Gaia factory, and is insisting on the sackings in Ovar.
Kolikšen je znesek subvencij Skupnosti, ki so bile dodeljene podjetju Yazaki Saltano na Portugalskem?
Just how much money has been granted to Yazaki Saltano in Portugal as Community subsidy?
Pod kakšnimi pogoji so bile te subvencije dodeljene?
Under what conditions were these subsidies granted?
Kolikšen je skupen znesek subvencij Skupnosti, ki so bile dodeljene podjetju Yazaki Group v različnih državah članicah in državah kandidatkah?
What is the total amount of Community subsidy granted to the Yazaki Group in the various Member States and candidate countries?
Kakšni bodo ukrepi glede na resnost trenutne situacije (represiven odnos, odpuščanja, poklicne bolezni, neupoštevanje direktive o obveščanju in posvetovanju tako z delavci kot tudi z Evropskim svetom delavcev) za zaščito delovnih mest in pravic teh delavcev?
What measures are going to be taken, in view of the seriousness of the current situation (punitive behaviour, sackings, occupational illness, failure to comply with the provisions of the directive on keeping workers informed and consulting both workers and the European Works Council), so as to protect the jobs and rights of these workers?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0060/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0060/05
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0061/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0061/05
Zadeva: Strategija Komisije za drugo srečanje podpisnic Aarhuške konvencije
Subject: Commission's strategy for the Second Meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, kakšne cilje ima za bližnje, drugo srečanje podpisnic od 25. do 27. maja 2005 v Almatyju v Kazahstanu?
Could the Commission clarify its objectives for the forthcoming Second Meeting of the Parties, to be held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, from 25-27 May 2005?
Kako namerava Komisija vključiti poslance Evropskega parlamenta v delegacijo Skupnosti, ki bo prisostvovala tej konferenci?
How is the Commission planning to involve the Members of the European Parliament in the Community delegation to the Conference?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0062/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0062/05
Zadeva: Financiranje vseevropskega prometnega omrežja (TEN-T)
Subject: Financing TEN-T
Pri uresničevanju obveznosti, sprejetih leta 1996 v postopku soodločanja med Parlamentom in Svetom, je prišlo do občutne zamude.
A significant delay has occurred in fulfilling the undertakings decided in 1996 by codecision between the Parliament and Council.
Od takrat so se s širitvijo Unije 1. maja 2004 pojavile nove potrebe, ki so vključene v Odločbo št. 884/2004/ES .
Since then, new needs have arisen with the enlargement of the Union on 1 May 2004, all of which are included in Decision No 884/2004/EC .
V zvezi s tem Komisija predlaga sredstva v višini 20,3 milijard evrov za vseevropsko prometno omrežje v okviru finančne perspektive za obdobje 2007 do 2013.
In this context the Commission proposes a budget of €20.3 billion for the trans-European transport network within the framework of the 2007-2013 Financial Perspective.
Ali Svet meni, da bo ta vsota zagotovila zadostno sofinanciranje s strani Skupnosti za 30 prednostnih projektov iz Odločbe št. 884/2004/ES?
Is it the Council's view that this amount will guarantee sufficient Community co-financing for the 30 priority projects in Decision no 884/2004/EC?
Lahko ta vsota izpolni zahteve finančne absorpcije prej omenjenih projektov?
Is this sum capable of meeting the financial absorption requirements of the aforesaid projects?
Ali lahko Svet zagotovi, da bo prednostna naloga Skupnosti ustrezno sofinanciranje vseh 48 čezmejnih segmentov 30-ih prednostnih projektov iz Odločbe št. 884/2004/ES?
Can the Council guarantee that the totality of the 48 cross-border sections of the 30 priority projects in Decision No 884/2004/EC will receive, as a priority, adequate Community co-financing?
UL L 201, 7.6.2004, str.
OJ L 201, 7.6.2004, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0063/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0063/05
Navede natančne razloge, ki so jo vodili k predlaganju sredstev v višini 20.3 milijarde evrov za vseevropsko prometno omrežje v okviru finančne perspektive za obdobje od 2007 do 2013?
can the Commission give the precise reasons that led it to propose a budget of €20.3 billion for the trans-European transport network in the framework of the 2007-2013 Financial Perspective?
Ali bo ta vsota zagotovila zadostno sofinanciranje 30 prednostnih projektov iz Odločbe št. 884/2004/ES, ki ga izvaja Skupnost?
Will this sum guarantee sufficient Community co-financing for the 30 priority projects in Decision No 884/2004/EC?
Ali bo s to vsoto mogoče izpolniti zahteve finančne absorpcije prej omenjenih projektov?
Is this sum capable of meeting the financial absorption requirements of the aforesaid projects?
Navede na podlagi česa namerava razdeliti ta sredstva, tako geografsko kot časovno?
On what bases does the Commission intend to distribute this budget, both geographically and over time?
Natančno opredeli 48 čezmejnih segmentov 30-tih prednostnih projektov iz Odločbe št. 884/2004/ES in zagotovi, da bo Skupnost vse prednostno sofinancirala?
Can the Commission provide an exact definition of the 48 cross-border sections of the 30 priority projects in Decision No 884/2004/EC and guarantee that they will all receive, as a priority, adequate Community co-financing?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0064/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0064/05
Zadeva: Zmogljivosti Evropske unije za odziv na grožnje javnemu zdravju, ki jih predstavlja bioterorizem
Subject: European Union capabilities to respond to public health threats posed by bioterrorism
Na vrhu EU-ZDA v Dromoland Castle na Irskem junija 2004 so EU in ZDA zatrdile, "da bodo sprejele konkretne ukrepe za razširitev in izboljšanje zmogljivosti preprečevanja in odzivanja na bioterorizem".
At the EU-US Summit at Dromoland Castle in Ireland in June 2004 the EU and the US stated that ‘we will take concrete steps to expand and improve our capabilities to prevent and respond to bioterrorism’.
Kaže, da so se ZDA tega lotile s "projektom bioščit", ni pa jasno, kaj se dogaja v EU.
The US does appear to have made a start on this with ‘Project Bioshield’, but it is not so clear what is happening within the EU.
Ali lahko Svet pojasni, kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti v Evropski uniji in v povezavi z Združenimi državami ter tretjimi državami kot odgovor na potencialno nevarne grožnje javnemu zdravju, ki jih predstavlja bioterorizem?
Can the Council outline the steps that are being taken both within the European Union and in conjunction with the United States and other third countries to respond to the potentially critical public health threats posed by bioterrorism?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0065/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0065/05
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti v Evropski uniji in v povezavi z Združenimi državami ter tretjimi državami kot odgovor na potencialno nevarne grožnje javnemu zdravju, ki jih predstavlja bioterorizem?
Can the Commission outline the steps that are being taken both within the European Union and in conjunction with the United States and other third countries to respond to the potentially critical public health threats posed by bioterrorism?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0066/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0066/05
Zadeva: Postopek komisije za preprečitev vseh tveganj navzkrižja interesov
Subject: Commission procedure designed to avoid any risk of conflict of interest
Bo Komisija pojasnila svoja pravila in prakso glede zasebnih daril?
Will the Commission explain its rules and practices on private gifts?
Kako je to mogoče, če je sprejel vredno darilo od osebe, ki jo s Komisijo vežejo poslovni odnosi in komercialni interesi?
How can this be so, when he accepted an important gift from a person who has business relations and commercial interests with the Commission?
In dalje, ker je komisar za konkurenco predpisal seznam podjetij, ki ga bo moral pregledati predsednik Komisije, in ker ta seznam vključuje več pomorskih podjetij, ali sprejetje gostoljubnosti lastnika večje ladjarske družbe s strani predsednika Komisije ne povzroča potencialnega navzkrižja interesov?
Furthermore, as the Commissioner for Competition has prescribed a list of companies, any investigations into which will be reallocated to the Commission President, and as this list includes several maritime businesses, does not the Commission President's acceptance of hospitality from the owner of a major shipping company give rise to more potential conflicts of interest?
Je odločitev, ali je sprejetje darila v skladu s splošnimi pravili obravnavanja konflikta interesov, pripuščeno zgolj presoji pristojnega Komisarja?
Is it up to the sole judgment of the relevant Commissioner whether the acceptance of a gift is compatible with the general rules on the handling of conflicts of interests?
Kako lahko Komisija zagotovi, da v takšnih primerih ne bi prišlo do zmote pri presoji?
What is the guarantee that no error of judgment will be made in such a case?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, katera "jasna in stroga pravila" so bila upoštevana pri obravnavi tega vprašanja?
Could the Commission explain which ‘clear and strict rules’ were used to handle this?
Ali lahko Komisija nujno nagovori Parlament s ciljem, da se ta vprašanja obravnavajo?
Can the Commission inform Parliament as a matter of urgency so that Parliament may consider these concerns?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0067/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0067/05
Zadeva: Študija o vplivu sistema REACH
Subject: Study of the impact of REACH
Po nedavni študiji podjetja KPMG, se bodo stroški za kemično industrijo z uredbo REACH zvišali za približno 6 do 20 odstotkov.
According to a recent study by KPMG, the REACH package of regulations will increase the costs of the chemical industry by an estimated figure of between 6% and 20%.
Ali Komisija meni, da je takšno zvišanje stroškov sprejemljivo?
Does the Commission consider such an increase in costs to be acceptable?
Kako namerava Komisija prilagoditi predlog direktive, da zniža stroške njene izvedbe?
What adjustments to the proposal for a directive will the Commission consider in order to reduce the resultant costs?
Kako namerava Komisija ukrepati, da stroške izvajanja sistema REACH v malih in srednje velikih podjetjih zniža na najnižjo možno raven?
What measures will the Commission consider in order, in particular, to reduce to a minimum the costs to SMEs of complying with REACH?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0068/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0068/05
, v imenu Odbora za peticije
, on behalf of the Committee on Petitions
Zadeva: Predlagatelji peticije - solastniki družbe Lloyd's: Izvajanje prve direktive za neživljenjsko zavarovanje
Subject: Lloyd's Names Petitioners: Implementation of the First Non-Life Insurance Directive
Namen direktive 73/239/EGS - prve direktive o neživljenjskem zavarovanju (kot je bila spremenjena) - je urejati in zagotavljati pravilno delovanje zavarovalniškega sektorja, vključno z zahtevami glede solventnosti.
Directive 73/239/EEC - The First Non-Life Insurance Directive (as amended) - aims to regulate and ensure the proper functioning of the insurance sector, including such issues as solvency requirements.
Je Evropska komisija popolnoma prepričana, da so bile v tem obdobju dejavnosti družbe Lloyd's of London povsem v skladu s predpisi?
Is the European Commission fully satisfied that the activities of Lloyd's of London were properly and effectively regulated during this period?
Če niso bile, bo Parlament zdaj končno dobil pisni odgovor na podrobna vprašanja iz Perryjevega poročila, za katerega jo je prosil septembra 2003?
If not, will it now submit to Parliament the specific response in writing, which is still outstanding, to the precise questions raised in the Perry Report, as requested by Parliament in September 2003?
UL L 228, 16.8.1973, str.
OJ L 228, 16.8.1973, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0069/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0069/05
, v imenu Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve
, on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
Zadeva: Možne združitve borz v Evropski uniji in prihodnja arhitektura finančnih trgov v EU
Subject: Possible stock exchange mergers in the European Union and future architecture of financial markets in the EU
Ali je Evropska komisija seznanjena z najnovejšim dogajanjem na finančnih trgih, ki poteka v smeri možne združitve dveh ali več najpomembnejših borz v Evropski uniji?
Is the Commission aware of recent developments in the financial markets with the prospect of a possible merger of two or more of the main stock exchanges in the European Union?