natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
S čim še, poleg predlogov za okrepljeno gospodarsko usklajevanje, namerava Komisija ponovno vzpostaviti zaupanje v evropske banke in finančne trge, okrepiti zaupanje državljanov v evropski projekt ter preprečiti vse močnejše protekcionistične in nacionalistične trende zaradi zahtevnih in neenakomernih gospodarskih razmer v Uniji?
In addition to the proposals for enforced economic coordination, how is the Commission planning to rebuild trust in European banks and financial markets, to strengthen citizens’ trust in the European project and to avoid protectionist and nationalistic tendencies growing due to the challenging and diverging economic developments inside the Union?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0049/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0049/10
Zadeva: Bonitetne agencije
Subject: Credit rating agencies
Kljub dejstvu, da institucije EU priznavajo negativno vlogo bonitetnih agencij v sedanji krizi (COM(2008)0704), je EU slednjim dodelila pravico, da ocenjujejo ne le podjetja, ampak tudi gospodarstvo držav članic.
Despite the fact that all EU institutions recognise the negative role played by credit rating agencies in the current crisis (COM(2008)0704), the EU has granted to the latter the right to evaluate not only businesses but also Member States’ economies.
Uredba (ES) št. 1060/2009 , namesto da bi omejila njihove dejavnosti, pravzaprav formalizira in povečuje naloge bonitetnih agencij.
Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 , instead of restricting the activities of CRAs, in essence, formalises and upgrades their functions.
Ne le, da bonitetne agencije niso uspele napovedati krize na trgu hipotekarnih posojil, ampak tudi niso objektivno ocenile kreditnega tveganja v vrsti finančnih škandalov.
At the same time, credit rating agencies have failed not only to predict the subprime crisis but also to objectively measure the credit risk in a series of financial scandals.
Poleg tega so se podjetja s celega sveta množično pritožila, da bonitetne agencije izsiljujejo plačila honorarjev, kar kaže na stanje nejasnosti, ki je značilno za bonitetne agencije.
Moreover, the numerous complaints from businesses around the world about extortion on the part of CRAs as regards fee payments, indicate that a considerable degree of opacity characterises CRAs.
Glede na to, da je politično nesprejemljivo in ekonomsko tvegano za EU in njene države članice, da upoštevajo bonitetne ocene zasebnih podjetij ter poleg tega omogočajo, da gospodarske funkcije, ki v nobenih okoliščinah ne bi smele biti v rokah zasebnih podjetij, izvajajo bonitetne agencije, katere takojšnje ukrepe namerava Svet sprejeti, da bi odpravil pravico bonitetnih agencij, da lahko ocenjujejo gospodarstva držav članic?
Given that it is politically unacceptable and economically risky for the EU and its Member States to take into account credit assessments of private companies and also to have CRAs perform economic functions which should under no circumstances be in the hands of private firms, what immediate action does the Council intend to take in order to remove the right of CRAs to evaluate the economies of Member States?
Treba je temeljito prestrukturirati bonitetne agencije, zato morajo javni organi odobravati dovoljenja zasebnim bonitetnim agencijam ter jih nadzorovati.
There is a need for rating agencies to be thoroughly restructured; private rating agencies must therefore be licensed and supervised by public authorities.
Kakšno je stališče Sveta do teh predlogov?
What is the Council's position on this?
Sedanje velike bonitetne agencije so družbe s sedežem v ZDA.
At present, the major rating agencies are US-based.
Kakšno je stališče Sveta glede javne Evropske bonitetne agencije, da bi rešili navzkrižje interesov, ki ovira postopek ocenjevanja bonitete?
What is the Council's position on a public European Credit Rating Agency in order to overcome conflicts of interest which impair the credit rating process?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0050/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0050/10
Zadeva: Izvajanje Direktive 2008/6/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. februarja 2008
Subject: Implementation of Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008
V skladu z določbami Direktive 2008/6/ES z dne 20. februarja 2008 bo notranji trg Skupnosti za poštne storitve izoblikovan do 31. decembra 2010.
In accordance with the provisions of Directive 2008/6/EC of 20 February 2008 the accomplishment of the internal market in Community postal services is to be completed by 31 December 2010.
Tako bo postal dostopen vsem izvajalcem poštnih storitev.
This will make the postal services market accessible to any operator.
Poleg tega so v Prilogi I navedene obveznosti iz člena 3 Direktive 97/67/ES , po katerih morajo države članice izvesti ustrezne študije za izračun neto stroškov za obveznost univerzalne storitve in navesti način, ki je bil izbran za povrnitev ali financiranje teh neto stroškov.
Moreover, as stated in Annex I to the directive, referring to the obligations set out in Article 3 of Directive 97/67/EC , Member States should provide appropriate studies concerning the calculation of the net costs of universal service obligations and the way chosen to ensure the recovery or the financing of such net costs.
Kdaj Komisija pričakuje, da bodo države članice pripravile te študije?
When does the Commission expect the Member States to deliver such studies?
Ali bo Komisija na osnovi člena 9 (horizontalna socialna klavzula) Lizbonske pogodbe pripravila oceno učinka v zvezi z odprtjem poštnega trga?
Will the Commission provide an impact assessment of the opening-up of the postal market, on the basis of Article 9 (horizontal social clause) of the Lisbon Treaty?
Ali Komisija lahko zagotovi, da se bo pošta pobirala pri strankah in dostavljala do njih povsod, tudi v odmaknjenih podeželskih območjih, vsaj petkrat tedensko, v skladu z obvezo univerzalne storitve?
Can the Commission guarantee that mail will be collected and delivered to and from customers everywhere, including in remote rural areas, at least five days a week, in accordance with the universal service obligation?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo države članice ohranile visoko raven socialnih razmer za poštne delavce tako v javnem kot v zasebnem sektorju in da bodo vsi izvajalci v tem sektorju upoštevali in izvajali pogoje zaposlovanja in socialnega varstva, tudi veljavne socialne sheme na nacionalni ravni?
How will the Commission ensure that Member States safeguard the high level of social conditions enjoyed by postal workers in both the public and private sectors and that all employment and social conditions, including social security schemes currently in force at national level, will be observed and implemented by all operators in this sector?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0051/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0051/10
Kljub dejstvu, da institucije EU priznavajo negativno vlogo bonitetnih agencij v sedanji krizi (KOM(2008)0704), je EU slednjim dodelila pravico, da ocenjujejo ne le podjetja, ampak tudi gospodarstvo držav članic.
Despite the fact that all EU institutions recognise the negative role played by credit rating agencies in the current crisis (COM(2008)0704), the EU has granted to the latter the right to evaluate not only businesses but also Member States’ economies.
Tako Uredba (ES) št. 1060/2009 pravzaprav formalizira in povečuje naloge bonitetnih agencij, namesto da bi njihove dejavnosti omejila.
Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 , instead of restricting the activities of CRAs, in essence, formalises and upgrades their functions.
Ne le, da bonitetne agencije niso uspele napovedati krize na trgu drugorazrednih hipotekarnih posojil, ampak tudi niso objektivno ocenile kreditnega tveganja v vrsti finančnih škandalov.
At the same time, credit rating agencies have failed not only to predict the subprime crisis but also to objectively measure the credit risk in a series of financial scandals.
Poleg tega so se podjetja s celega sveta množično pritožila, da bonitetne agencije izsiljujejo plačila honorarjev, kar kaže, da je za delovanje bonitetnih agencij značilna precejšnja nejasnost.
Moreover, the numerous complaints from businesses around the world about extortion on the part of CRAs as regards fee payments indicate that a considerable degree of opacity characterises CRAs.
Glede na to, da je politično nesprejemljivo in ekonomsko tvegano za EU in njene države članice, da upoštevajo bonitetne ocene zasebnih podjetij in da bonitetne agencije izvajajo gospodarske funkcije, ki v nobenih okoliščinah ne bi smele biti v rokah zasebnih podjetij, katere takojšnje ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi tem agencijam odvzela pravico do ocenjevanja gospodarstva držav članic?
Given that it is politically unacceptable and economically risky for the EU and its Member States to take into account credit assessments of private companies and also to have CRAs perform economic functions which should under no circumstances be in the hands of private firms, what immediate action does the Commission intend to take in order to remove the right of CRAs to evaluate the economies of Member States?
Bonitetne agencije je treba temeljito prestrukturirati, zato morajo javni organi odobravati dovoljenja zasebnim bonitetnim agencijam ter jih nadzorovati.
There is a need for rating agencies to be thoroughly restructured; private rating agencies must therefore be licensed and supervised by public authorities.
Kakšno je stališče Komisije do teh predlogov?
What is the Commission’s position on this?
Sedaj imajo velike bonitetne agencije sedež v ZDA.
At present, the major rating agencies are US-based.
Kakšno je stališče Komisije glede javne Evropske bonitetne agencije, da bi rešili navzkrižje interesov, ki ovira postopek ocenjevanja bonitete?
What is the Commission’s position on a public European Credit Rating Agency in order to overcome conflicts of interest which impair the credit rating process?
UL L 302, 17.11.2009, str.
OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0052/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0052/10
Zadeva: Kakšen je politični pomen strategije EU 2020 v sedanji finančni in gospodarski krizi?
Subject: What is the political relevance of the EU 2020 strategy in the context of the current financial and economic crisis?
Kakšna je po mnenju Sveta vloga strategije EU 2020 pri premagovanju sedanje finančne in gospodarske krize?
What role does the Council see for the EU 2020 strategy in overcoming the current financial and economic crisis?
Ali strategija EU 2020 dovolj upošteva soodvisnost makroekonomske politike in strukturnih sprememb?
Does the EU 2020 strategy take sufficient account of the interdependence of macroeconomic policy and structural change?
Ali je Svet pripravljen podpreti ambiciozen predlog Evropske komisije, da bi okrepili pakt stabilnosti in rasti?
Is the Council willing to support an ambitious proposal by the European Commission to strengthen the stability and growth pact?
Ali se Svet strinja, da so ambiciozni cilji strategije odvisni od hitre obnove rasti evropskega gospodarstva in da bi učinkovitejše usklajevanje makroekonomskih politik močno povečalo obete za okrepljeno rast?
Does the Council accept that the strategy’s ambitious targets depend on rapidly restoring growth to the European economy and that the prospects for stronger growth would be greatly enhanced by more effective coordination of macroeconomic policies?
Ali bo Svet podprl ukrepe, s katerimi bi Unija pridobila sposobnost izvajanja usklajenih politik za rast, naložbe in konkurenčnost?
Will the Council support measures to equip the Union with the capacity to implement coordinated policies for growth, investment and competitiveness?
Ali so sedanji predlogi po mnenju Sveta dovolj ambiciozni, da bi z njimi evropsko gospodarstvo leta 2020 prevzelo vodilno vlogo v svetovnem gospodarstvu ?
Does the Council believe the current proposals are sufficiently ambitious to make the European economy a world leader in 2020?
Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da bodo proračunski načrti Unije in držav članic odražali prednostne naloge strategije EU 2020 in da bodo financiranje in reforme na evropski in nacionalni ravni skladni s političnimi cilji, ki jih podprl je Evropski svet ?
How will the Council ensure that the budgetary plans of the Union and the Member States reflect the priorities of the EU 2020 strategy and that funding and reforms are consistent, at European and national level, with the policy objectives and targets to which the European Council has signed up?
Ali je Svet pripravljen sprejeti in predložiti sekundarno zakonodajo, s katero bi vzpostavili bolj zavezujoč okvir EU 2020 za države članice?
Is the Council ready to accept and propose secondary legislation in order to establish a more binding EU 2020 framework for Member States?
Kako lahko strategija EU 2020 pripomore k izvedbi potrebnih strukturnih reform?
How can the EU 2020 strategy help implement the necessary structural reforms?
Kakšna naj bi bila po mnenju Sveta vloga Komisije in Parlamenta v delovni skupini, ki jo je Evropski svet ustanovil marca 2010 za izboljšanje gospodarskega upravljanja v Uniji?
What role does the Council see for the Commission and Parliament in the task force established by the European Council in March 2010 in order to improve economic governance in the Union?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0053/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0053/10
Kakšna je po mnenju Komisije vloga strategije EU 2020 pri premagovanju sedanje finančne in gospodarske krize?
What role does the Commission see for the EU 2020 strategy in overcoming the current financial and economic crisis?
Ali strategija EU 2020 dovolj upošteva soodvisnost makroekonomske politike in strukturnih sprememb, vključno z vlogo pakta stabilnosti in rasti?
Does the EU 2020 strategy take sufficient account of the interdependence of macroeconomic policy and structural change, including the role of the Stability and Growth Pact?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da so ambiciozni cilji strategije odvisni od hitre obnove rasti evropskega gospodarstva in da bi učinkovitejše usklajevanje makroekonomskih politik močno povečalo obete za okrepljeno rast?
Does the Commission accept that the strategy’s ambitious targets depend on rapidly restoring growth to the European economy and that the prospects for stronger growth would be greatly enhanced by more effective coordination of macroeconomic policies?
Ali bo Komisija predlagala ukrepe, s katerimi bi Unija pridobila sposobnost izvajanja usklajenih politik za rast, naložbe in konkurenčnost?
Will the Commission bring forward measures to equip the Union with the capacity to implement coordinated policies for growth, investment and competitiveness?
Ali so sedanji predlogi po prepričanju Komisije dovolj ambiciozni, da bi z njimi evropsko gospodarstvo leta 2020 prevzelo vodilno vlogo v svetovnem gospodarstvu?
Does the Commission believe the current proposals are sufficiently ambitious to make the European economy a world leader in 2020?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo proračunski načrti Unije in držav članic odražali prednostne naloge strategije EU 2020 in da bodo financiranje in reforme na evropski in nacionalni ravni skladni s političnimi cilji, ki jih je podprl Evropski svet?
How will the Commission ensure that the budgetary plans of the Union and the Member States reflect the priorities of the EU 2020 strategy and that funding and reforms are consistent, at European and national level, with the policy objectives and targets to which the European Council has signed up?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena predložiti sekundarno zakonodajo, s katero bi vzpostavili bolj zavezujoč okvir EU 2020 za države članice?
Is the Commission ready to accept and propose secondary legislation in order to establish a more binding EU 2020 framework for Member States?
Kakšna naj bi bila po mnenju Komisije njena vloga in vloga Parlamenta v delovni skupini, ki jo je Evropski svet ustanovil marca 2010 za izboljšanje gospodarskega upravljanja v Uniji?
What role does the Commission see for the Commission and Parliament in the task force established by the European Council in March 2010 in order to improve economic governance in the Union?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0054/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0054/10
Zadeva: Zaposlovanje in socialne razsežnosti Evrope 2020
Subject: Employment and social dimensions of Europe 2020
Katere pobude je Komisija sprejela za lažje sprejetje sporazuma o merljivih ciljih EU na področju izobrazbe in zmanjševanja revščine, glede na to, da na spomladanskem zasedanju Sveta ni bil dosežen dogovor o numeričnih vrednostih vseh ciljev, ki jih je predlagala?
Since the Spring European Council failed to agree on the numerical rates of all targets proposed by the Commission, what initiatives has the Commission undertaken to facilitate the agreement of EU quantifiable targets in the education and poverty reduction areas?
Upravljanje: Komisija in Svet sta poudarila pomembno vlogo Parlamenta v strategiji EU 2020 in se obvezala k zagotavljanju večje vključenosti Parlamenta v sporazum o smernicah in izvajanju nove strategije.
Governance: Both the Commission and the Council have underlined Parliament's crucial role in the Europe 2020 strategy and expressed commitments to ensure better involvement of the Parliament in the agreement of the guidelines and the implementation of the new strategy.
Ali lahko Komisija s svojega stališča razloži, kdaj in katere konkretne ukrepe lahko pričakujemo na tem področju?
Can the Commission explain, from its point of view, when and in what form concrete steps can be expected in this respect?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0055/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0055/10
Zadeva: Zmanjšanje proračunov za izobraževanje - Evropa 2020
Subject: Cuts in education budgets - Europe 2020
Komisija v svoji strategiji Evropa 2020 in letnem delovnem programu predlaga posebne ukrepe na ravni EU, s katerimi bi povečali uspešnost izobraževalnih sistemov in privlačnost evropskega visokošolskega sistema, omogočili več programov mobilnosti in usposabljanja za mlade, posodobili trge dela ter spodbujali mobilnost delavcev in razvoj njihovih znanj in spretnosti v vseh življenjskih obdobjih, da bi se povečalo vključevanje delavcev na trgu dela in da bi bolje uskladili ponudbo in povpraševanje.
The Commission's Europe 2020 strategy and annual work programme propose specific actions at EU level which aim to enhance the performance of education systems, to reinforce the attractiveness of Europe's higher education system, to open up more mobility and training programmes for young people, to modernise labour markets and to boost labour mobility and the development of skills and competences throughout the lifecycle with a view to increasing labour participation and better matching supply and demand.
Evropski svet je spomladi podprl strategijo Evropa 2020 in v svojih sklepih s 25. in 26. marca navedel, da so za to strategijo potrebni ukrepi na temeljnih področjih znanja in inovacij ter trga dela.
The Spring European Council endorsed the Europe 2020 strategy and in its conclusions of 25/26 March states that the Europe 2020 strategy needs action in key areas targeting knowledge and innovation, and the labour market.
Kot cilje določa izboljšanje razmer za raziskave in razvoj, zvišanje ravni izobrazbe, zmanjšanje števila mladih, ki se odločijo za zgodnjo opustitev šolanja, in večje vključevanje mladih, starejših delavcev in nizkokvalificiranih delavcev na trgu dela.
It sets out as objectives better conditions for research and development, improved education levels, a reduction in the number of early school-leavers, and the increased participation of youth, older workers and low-skilled workers in the labour market.
Vendar strategije Evropa 2020 ni mogoče resno obravnavati, če države članice ne bodo sprejele ustreznih proračunskih obveznosti za doseganje ciljev na prednostnem področju izobraževanja.
The Europe 2020 strategy cannot, however, be taken seriously without appropriate budgetary commitments from the Member States to fulfil its goals in its priority field of education.
Za nove pobude in programe bodo potrebna ustrezna sredstva.
New initiatives and programmes will require adequate funding.
Vendar pa podatki kažejo, da države članice v nasprotju s svojimi zavezami v strategiji Evropa 2020, ne namenjajo ustreznih sredstev za pobude na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja, ampak zaradi finančne krize dejansko zmanjšujejo svoja proračunska sredstva za izobraževanje in raziskave.
However, figures show that, contrary to what they have signed up to in the Europe 2020 strategy, Member States are not setting aside appropriate funding for education and training initiatives, but are in fact cutting funding in their education and research budgets in response to the financial crisis.
Kako namerava Komisija ukrepati, da bi spremenila ta trend?
What does the Commission intend to do to reverse this trend?
Na kakšen način lahko zagotovi, da bodo države članice v resnici spoštovale te zaveze?
How can it ensure that Member States actually follow through on these commitments?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0056/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0056/10
Zadeva: Izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005
Subject: Implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005 z dne 27. junija 2005 obravnava trgovino z določenim blagom, ki bi se lahko uporabilo za izvršitev smrtne kazni, mučenje ali drugo okrutno, nečloveško ali poniževalno ravnanje ali kaznovanje, in navaja seznam opreme, ki jo je treba prepovedati ali strogo nadzorovati.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 of 27 June 2005 concerns control of EU trade in goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and lists equipment which should be prohibited or strictly controlled.
Uredba je začela veljati 30. junija 2006 in s tem postala prvi večstranski instrument o nadzoru trgovine, ki je prepovedal mednarodno trgovanje z opremo, katere edini praktični namen je izvrševanje smrtne kazni, mučenje in druge oblike grdega ravnanja.
When it came into force on 30 June 2006, it was the world’s first multilateral trade control instrument to prohibit international trade in equipment that has no other practical purpose than for capital punishment, torture and other ill-treatment.
Na žalost obstajajo resni pomisleki glede izvajanja te uredbe, namreč, da še zdaleč ni zgledno.
Unfortunately, there are serious concerns that the implementation of this Regulation has been far from exemplary.
Države članice niso izpolnile svojih obveznosti glede predložitve letnih poročil o dejavnostih, vse tudi niso zagotovile informacij o sprejetih kazenskih ukrepih za kršitelje uredbe, seznam prepovedanih naprav pa ni dovolj izčrpen.
Member States have failed to comply with their obligation to present annual activity reports, not all Member States have provided information about legislation introduced to penalise those who violate the Regulation and the list of prohibited items seems not to be sufficiently exhaustive.
Katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti Svet za izboljšanje preglednosti in poročanja ter izvajanja omenjene uredbe v državah članicah?
What measures does the Council foresee to improve the transparency, reporting and implementation of the Regulation by the Member States?
Kako je mogoče izboljšati ocenjevanje organov držav članic, ki izdajajo dovoljenja za izvoz, da bi preprečili možnost zlorabe izvoženih naprav iz uredbe, ki se uporabljajo za mučenje ali druge oblike grdega ravnanja, kot zahteva člen 6 te uredbe?
How can the assessment of Member States’ export licensing authorities be improved in order to avoid the risk that items exported under the Regulation may be misused for torture or other ill-treatment, as required by Article 6 of the Regulation?
Katere ukrepe bi lahko sprejeli v takih primerih?
What measures can be taken where this proves to be the case?
UL L 200, 30.7.2005, str.
OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0057/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0057/10