natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pred le nekaj tedni so španski kontrolorji z zaprtjem španskega zračnega prostora povzročili resne incidente in s tem močno oškodovali državljane, podjetja in celotno špansko gospodarstvo.
Only a few weeks ago citizens, airlines and the Spanish economy as a whole were badly affected by the serious incidents caused by Spanish air traffic controllers, involving the closure of Spanish airspace.
Aprila letos je bilo zaradi izbruha vulkana na Islandiji in posledično zaradi motenj v evropskem zračnem prostoru prizadetih več tisoč potnikov, saj so bili številni leti odpovedani, letalske družbe, letališča in evropsko gospodarstvo pa so utrpeli večmilijonsko škodo.
In April 2010 the eruption of the Icelandic volcano caused serious disruption to European airspace, leading to flight cancellations and affecting hundreds of thousands of passengers, resulting in losses for airlines, airports and the European economy amounting to millions of euros.
Ali Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba v takšnih situacijah, brez posredovanja v ukrepe, sprejete na nacionalni ravni, okrepiti zmogljivosti za odziv na evropski ravni s pripravo potrebnih mehanizmov za učinkovitejše ukrepanje v času takšnih kriz, ki na koncu prizadenejo celoten evropski zračni prostor?
Faced with this type of situation, and without prejudice to the measures taken at national level, does the Commission not take the view that response capacity at European level should be strengthened, providing the necessary resources to act more effectively to tackle the crises that have recently been affecting European airspace as a whole?
Ali Komisija načrtuje sprejetje konkretnih ukrepov v okviru oblikovanja enotnega evropskega neba, da bi povečala pristojnosti upravljavca evropskega omrežja (Eurocontrol) na tem področju?
Will the Commission take practical steps as part of the Single European Sky project to strengthen the powers of the European air traffic management network (Eurocontrol) in this area?
Katere ukrepe predlaga Komisija za spodbujanje mobilnosti evropskih zračnih kontrolorjev?
What steps would the Commission propose in order to promote the mobility of European air traffic controllers?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba oblikovati na primer evropske skupine, ki bi jih bilo mogoče mobilizirati za takojšnje posredovanje in zagotavljanje potrebne pomoči, če bi kriza v eni od držav članic negativno vplivala na evropsko omrežje?
Does the Commission consider it appropriate, for example, to set up European teams that could be mobilised to intervene immediately and provide all the necessary support if a crisis in a Member State is having an adverse impact on the European network?
In končno, kako pomembno vlogo bi v prihodnosti lahko imel program SESAR, ki je resnična tehnološka razsežnost enotnega evropskega neba, z razvojem in uporabo novih tehnologij sistemov zračne navigacije za reševanje takšnih situacij?
Finally, to what extent might the SESAR programme, the true technological dimension of the Single European Sky, play a key role in the future by developing and applying new aviation system technologies in order to resolve such situations?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0215/2010
Question for oral answer O-0215/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Nujno potrebna revizija uredbe o Evropskem skladu za prilagoditev globalizaciji
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Need for an urgent revision of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund Regulation
Po reviziji uredbe o Evropskem skladu za prilagoditev globalizaciji junija 2009, ki je omogočila, da se podpora zagotavlja tudi delavcem, ki so bili odpuščeni neposredno zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize, je bilo Komisiji posredovanih veliko prošenj za financiranje iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji.
Following the revision of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) Regulation in June 2009, which allows support also to be provided to workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis, a large number of applications for EGF funding have been submitted to the Commission.
Z močno povečanim povpraševanjem postajajo opazne pomanjkljivosti v delovanju tega sklada, zlasti zelo velike zamude pri dejanskem zagotavljanju finančne pomoči na terenu.
This significant increase in demand is highlighting shortcomings in the operation of this fund, in particular the very long delays in actually delivering financial assistance on the ground.
Parlament je 7. septembra 2010 sprejel resolucijo o financiranju in delovanju Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (poročilo A7-0236/2010 , poročevalec: Miguel Portas), v katerem poziva k izboljšanju postopkovne in proračunske ureditve sklada.
On 7 September 2010 Parliament adopted a resolution on the funding and functioning of the EGF (report A7-0236/2010 , rapporteur: Miguel Portas), calling for improvements to be made to the fund's procedural and budgetary arrangements.
Parlament je v ta namen pozval Komisijo, naj nov predlog za revizijo uredbe o Evropskem skladu za prilagoditev globalizaciji vloži hkrati z vmesno oceno sklada.
To this end, Parliament asked the Commission to submit a new proposal for revision of the EGF Regulation at the same time as the mid-term evaluation of the fund.
Kdaj namerava Komisija glede na nujne razmere, ki jih je povzročil naval novih prošenj, predložiti predlog za revizijo uredbe o Evropskem skladu za prilagoditev globalizaciji?
Given the urgency of the situation caused by this influx of new applications, when does the Commission intend to come forward with a proposal to revise the EGF Regulation?
Ali se bodo s to revizijo podaljšali obdobje veljavnosti revizije uredbe o Evropskem skladu za prilagoditev globalizaciji iz leta 2009 in z njo zagotovljena odstopanja, in sicer do konca tekočega večletnega finančnega okvira leta 2013 (namesto konca leta 2011, kakor je bilo prvotno načrtovano), v skladu z zahtevo Parlamenta v zvezi s to zadevo?
Will such a revision extend the period of validity of the 2009 EGF revision and of the derogations for which it provides until the end of the current multiannual financial framework in 2013 (instead of the end of 2011, as originally planned), in line with Parliament's request on this matter?
Katere konkretne predloge iz zadevnega poročila Evropskega parlamenta o olajševanju, pospeševanju in poenostavitvi uporabe Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji namerava Komisija vključiti v svoj nov zakonodajni predlog?
Which of the specific proposals put forward in the relevant European Parliament report concerning the facilitation, acceleration and simplification of EGF mobilisation does the Commission intend to take on board in its new legislative proposal?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0216/2010
Question for oral answer O-0216/2010
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Kršitev svobode govora in diskriminacija na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti v Litvi
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Violation of the freedom of expression and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in Lithuania
V litovskem parlamentu poteka obravnava predloga spremembe upravnega zakonika, ki uvaja nov prekršek, za katerega je zagrožena globa, in sicer „javno promocijo homoseksualnih odnosov“.
The Lithuanian Parliament is examining an amendment to the Administrative Code establishing a new offence punishable by a fine for the ‘public promotion of homosexual relations’.
Zakon o zaščiti mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi učinki javnega obveščanja prepoveduje informacije javnega značaja, dostopne mladoletnim osebam, s katerimi se spodbujajo homoseksualni, biseksualni ali poligamni odnosi (člen 4, XI-133).
The Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information bans public information accessible to minors ‘whereby homosexual, bisexual or polygamous relations are promoted’ (Art. 4, XI-133).
Predlog spremembe, o katerem poteka razprava v parlamentu, bi fizičnim in pravnim osebam preprečeval razširjanje informacij, ki bi spodbujale spolne odnose ali drugačno razumevanje sklenitve zakonske zveze oziroma ustvarjanja družine, razen tistih, določenih z ustavo oziroma s civilnim zakonikom.
The amendment currently under parliamentary examination would prevent natural or legal persons from disseminating ‘information that would promote sexual relations or definitions of marriage or what constitutes a family other than those established in the Constitution or the Civil Code’.
Tako spremenjeni kazenski zakonik bi resno omejil svobodo govora in izražanja, na primer javno podpiranje enakosti ali organiziranje kampanj za enakost, pravice lezbijk, gejev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev ter nasprotovanje diskriminaciji na podlagi spola ali spolne usmerjenosti.
Thus amended, the Penal Code would seriously limit freedom of speech and expression, such as publicly supporting or campaigning for equality or LGBT rights, or against discrimination based on gender or sexual orientation.
Predlagana sprememba je namenjena uporabi na javnih krajih, vključno z mediji, uporabili pa bi jo lahko za preprečevanje izvedbe parad ponosa lezbijk, gejev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev.
The amendment is designed to apply to public spaces, including in the media, and could be used to prevent LGBT pride marches from taking place.
Litovski parlament naj bi predlog spremembe preučil do 16. decembra.
The Lithuanian Parliament is expected to complete its examination of the amendment by 16 December.
– Ali Komisija meni, da bo tako spremenjeni kazenski zakonik Litve še naprej skladen z vrednotami iz člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in temeljnimi svoboščinami, ki jih zagotavlja Listina EU o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti s svobodo izražanja in obveščanja (člen 11) ter svobodo zbiranja (člen 12)?
– Does the Commission think that, thus amended, the Penal Code of Lithuania will remain compatible with the values listed in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights, notably freedom of expression and information (Art. 11) and freedom of assembly (Art. 12)?
– Ali ne meni, da bo tako spremenjeni kazenski zakonik vseboval razlikovanje na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti?
– Does the Commission consider that, thus amended, the Penal Code will discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation?
– Kako bo Komisija izrazila svojo zaskrbljenost glede ravnanja litovskega parlamenta in vlade?
– What will the Commission do to express its concern to the Lithuanian Parliament and Government?
– Ali bo sprožila postopek ugotavljanja kršitev, če bo zakon potrjen?
– Should the law be approved, will the Commission initiate infringement proceedings?
– Ali namerava Komisija predlagati načrt EU za enakost lezbijk, gejev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev, da bi se celovito zoperstavila diskriminaciji na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti in spolne identitete, ki smo ji priča v tem primeru?
– Will the Commission put forward an EU Roadmap for LGBT equality to comprehensively combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity, such as in this case?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0217/2010
Question for oral answer O-0217/2010
Zadeva: Jasne informacije za starše in starejše potnike v zračnem prevozu
Subject: Accurate information for parents and elderly passengers travelling by air
Kar zadeva zakonodajo, je zračni promet sektor, v katerem potniki uživajo najširšo paleto pravic.
As far as legislation is concerned, air transport is the sector in which passengers have the most extensive range of rights.
Eden od zakonodajnih aktov, ki se uporabljajo za zračni promet, je posebna uredba (Uredba (ES) št 1107/2006) o pravicah invalidnih oseb in oseb z omejeno mobilnostjo v zračnem prevozu.
The legislation applicable to air transport includes a specific Regulation ((EC) No 1107/2006) concerning the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air.
Načela, zajamčena s to uredbo, vključujejo dostopnost, nediskriminacijo, pomoč in pravico do informacij v dostopni obliki.
The principles guaranteed by this regulation include accessibility, non-discrimination, assistance and the right to information in accessible formats.
Na žalost pa število potnikov, ki se dejansko zavedajo svojih pravic, še zdaleč ni zadovoljivo.
Unfortunately, however, the number of passengers who are actually aware of their rights is far from satisfactory.
Čeprav so invalidi večinoma seznanjeni s svojimi pravicami, se starejši ljudje ter starši, ki potujejo sami z majhnimi otroki (tj. osebe, katerih mobilnost je omejena zaradi starosti) svojih pravic precej manj zavedajo.
Although disabled people mostly know about their rights, older people and mothers or fathers travelling alone with young children (i.e. people whose mobility is reduced owing to their age) are far less aware.
Treba je opozoriti na dejstvo, da se isti simbol (oseba na invalidskem vozičku na modrem ozadju) na primer uporablja za označevanje informacijskih točk, stranišč in dvigal, . namenjenih tako invalidom kakor tudi osebam z omejeno mobilnostjo.
Attention needs to be drawn to the fact that the same symbol (a person in a wheelchair on a blue background) is used to indicate facilities – such as information points, toilets and lifts – which are for use by disabled people and those with reduced mobility.
Osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo pa pogosto mislijo, da so ti kraji namenjeni samo za invalide.
People with reduced mobility often think that the facilities concerned are for use by disabled people only.
Letališki uslužbenci so velikokrat istega mnenja in zato tudi ne ukrepajo ustrezno.
Airport employees tend to come to the same conclusion, which explains why they fail to act.
Ali glede na navedeno Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba predlagati uvedbo novega simbola na vseh letališčih v EU, ki bo predstavljal osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo in ki ga bodo lahko jasno prepoznali tudi starejši ter starši, ki potujejo sami z majhnimi otroki?
In the light of the above, does the Commission not take the view that a new symbol should be proposed for use in all EU airports, representing a person with reduced mobility clearly recognisable as such by elderly people and by mothers and fathers travelling alone with young children?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba v naslovu uredbe izrecno navesti starše z majhnimi otroki ter starejše potnike?
Does the Commission not think that the regulation’s title should mention mothers and fathers with small children, along with elderly passengers?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000001/2011
Question for oral answer O-000001/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Ukrepi Skupnosti za preprečevanje gozdnih požarov
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Community measures for the prevention of forest fires
V Evropski uniji vsako leto zgori povprečno 500.000 hektarjev gozdov.
Every year in the European Union on average 500 000 ha of forests are burnt.
V najbolj prizadetih državah članicah lahko zabeležijo 50.000 požarov letno.
The worst affected of the Member States can record 50 000 fires each year.
Število požarov je v zadnjih desetih letih naraslo in se širi tudi izven sredozemskega območja, tako da postaja to vprašanje splošni problem, ki zadeva vso Evropo.
The number of fires has increased in the last 10 years and is extending beyond the Mediterranean regions, turning this into a general problem, which affects the whole of Europe.
Glavni vzrok za nastajanje gozdnih požarov je človekoa dejavnost: 90 % jih povzroči človeška roka.
Forest fires are mainly started by human action: 90 % of fires are of human origin.
Od preklica Uredbe (EGS) št. 2158/92 ni več posebne gozdne politike, ki bi obravnavala preprečevanje požarnega tveganja.
Since the repeal of Regulation (EEC) No 2158/92 there has no longer been a specific forest policy on the prevention of fire risks.
Glede na omenjeno in glede na to, da je bila 1. marca 2010 objavljena zelena knjiga o varstvu gozdov v Evropski uniji in pripravi gozdov na podnebne spremembe, ali Komisija upošteva preventivne ukrepe proti gozdnim požarom?
In the light of this, and following the publication of the Green Paper on 'Forest Protection and Information in the EU: Preparing forests for climate change' on 1 March 2010, is the Commission taking account of prevention measures against forest fires?
Kakšen je bil napredek pri posameznih ukrepih?
What progress has been made in terms of concrete measures?
Ali Komisija na tem področju pripravlja nadaljnje preventivne ukrepe?
Is the Commission preparing further preventive measures in this field?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000002/2011
Question for oral answer O-000002/2011
Zadeva: Strategija EU za atlantsko regijo
Subject: EU strategy for the Atlantic region
Svet je 14. junija 2010 pozval Komisijo, naj do junija 2011 pripravi strategijo za atlantsko regijo.
On 14 June 2010, the Council called on the Commission to draw up a strategy for the Atlantic region by June 2011.
Komisija je odprla javno razpravo in sedaj pripravlja sporočilo o strategiji EU za atlantsko regijo.
The Commission launched a public consultation and is now preparing a communication on an EU strategy for the Atlantic region.
Ali lahko Komisija pove kaj več o rezultatih te razprave in pojasni glavne točke strategije?
Can the Commission provide information on the results of this consultation and explain its priorities for the strategy?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000003/2011
Question for oral answer O-000003/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Sodni pozivi Združenih držav v zvezi s spletno stranjo Wikileaks in določbe EU o varstvu podatkov
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: US subpoenas in relation to Wikileaks and EU data protection rules
Sredstva javnega obveščanja poročajo o sodnih pozivih organov Združenih držav družbi Twitter in morda drugim internetnim družbam, kot sta Google in Facebook, s katerimi se ukazuje posredovanje osebnih podatkov, sporočil in korespondence oseb, ki so domnevno povezane s spletno stranjo Wikileaks, vključno s podatki islandskega poslanca in nizozemskega državljana.
There have been media reports about US authorities' subpoenas to Twitter and possibly other internet firms, such as Google and Facebook, ordering the handover of personal data, messages and communications of persons possibly related to Wikileaks, including those of an Icelandic MP and a Dutch citizen.
Ministrstvo za pravosodje je 14. decembra 2010 poslalo sodni poziv družbi Twitter, okrožno sodišče Združenih držav pa je ukazalo izročitev podatkov za obdobje od novembra 2009 do danes .
A subpoena was sent on 14 December 2010 from the Department of Justice to Twitter and a US district court ordered the handover of data from November 2009 to the present day .
7. januarja 2011 je družba Twitter objavila ta podatek, zatem ko je zmagala v zadevi v zvezi s pravico, da se posameznike, ki jih to zadeva, o tem obvesti.
On 7 January 2011, Twitter made this information public, after winning a legal battle concerning the right to inform the individuals involved.
Ali lahko Svet organe Združenih držav nemudoma zaprosi za uradna in natančna pojasnila o sodnih pozivih, o tem, ali so pozivi povezani s preiskavo nezakonitih dejavnosti (v tem primeru naj se o tem dajo podatki), o zahtevanih podatkih, o virih, sredstvih javnega obveščanja in družbah za komunikacijo, ki jih to zadeva, pa tudi o vseh drugih podatkih, pomembnih za to zadevo?
Can the Council, as a matter of urgency, seek official and detailed clarifications from the US authorities about the subpoena(s), whether they are connected to a criminal enquiry regarding illegal acts (and if so, provide information), the data requested, the sources, media and communication companies concerned, as well as any other relevant information on the case?
Ali lahko Svet nemudoma pojasni:
Can the Council also clarify the following, as a matter of urgency:
– vprašanje pristojnosti in zakonitosti takega domnevno ekstrateritorialnega delovanja ter skladnost teh pravnih ukrepov z varovanjem zasebnosti državljanov EU, vključno z vprašanjem, ali je kršen ali bi lahko bil kršen kakšen evropski ali nacionalni zakon o varstvu podatkov;
– the issue of jurisdiction and the legality of its apparent extra-territorial application, and the compatibility of these legal moves with protection of the privacy of EU citizens, including the question of whether any European or national data protection law has been or could be violated;
– ali ve za kakšne podobne sodne pozive, ki so bili izdani v preteklosti v zvezi z osebnimi podatki državljanov EU, in kaj je v zvezi s tem naredil;
– whether it is aware of any similar subpoenas issued in the past in relation to personal data of EU citizens and what action it took in this regard;
– kakšno stališče in ukrepe bo sprejel do organov Združenih držav ter družb za javno obveščanje in komunikacijo v primeru dejanske ali preteče kršitve določb EU o varstvu podatkov?
– what representations will it make to the US authorities and media and communication companies, and what action will it take in the case of violation, actual or prospective, of EU data protection rules?
Zahtevani podatki vključujejo: imena naročnikov, uporabniška imena, psevdonime in druge identitete; poštne naslove, naslove prebivališč, službene naslove, elektronske naslove in druge kontaktne informacije; registre povezav ali registre časa in trajanja posameznih povezav; trajanje storitev (vključno z datumom začetka) in vrste uporabljenih storitev; telefonsko številko ali številko naprave ali drugo naročniško številko ali identiteto, vključno z morebitnimi začasnimi spletnimi naslovi; načine in vire plačevanja teh storitev (vključno s številkami kreditnih kartic ali številkami bančnih računov) in registre fakturiranja; zabeležke o vseh dejavnostih uporabnikov glede vseh povezav, opravljenih z njegovega uporabniškega računa ali na njegov uporabniški račun; nevsebinske podatke, kot so IP naslovi in izvorni ali ciljni naslovi elektronske pošte; korespondenco in izpiske iz registra v zvezi z uporabniškimi računi.
The data requested includes: subscriber names, user names, screen names, or other identities; mailing addresses, residential addresses, business addresses, e-mail addresses and other contact information; connection records, or records of session times and durations; length of service (including start date) and types of services utilised; telephone or instrument number or other subscriber number or identity, including any temporarily assigned network address; means and source of payment of such service (including any credit card or bank account number) and billing records; records of user activity for any connections made to or from the account; non-content information such as IP addresses and source or destination email addresses; correspondence and notes of records related to the accounts.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000004/2011
Question for oral answer O-000004/2011
Sredstva javnega obveščanja poročajo o sodnih pozivih organov Združenih držav družbi Twitter in morda drugim internetnim družbam, kot sta Google in Facebook, s katerimi se ukazuje posredovanje osebnih podatkov, sporočil in korespondence oseb, ki so domnevno povezane s spletno stranjo Wikileaks, vključno s podatki islandskega poslanca in nizozemskega državljana.
There have been media reports about US authorities' subpoenas to Twitter and possibly other internet firms, such as Google and Facebook, ordering the handover of personal data, messages and communications of persons possibly related with Wikileaks, including those of an Icelandic MP and of a Dutch citizen.
Ministrstvo za pravosodje je 14. decembra 2010 poslalo sodni poziv družbi Twitter, okrožno sodišče Združenih držav pa je ukazalo izročitev podatkov za obdobje od novembra 2009 do danes .
A subpoena was sent on 14 December 2010 from the Department of Justice to Twitter and a US district court ordered the handover of data from November 2009 to the present .