natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje je 15. junija 2011 na seji pododbora Evropskega parlamenta za človekove pravice poročala, da je v taboriščih 6.000 ljudi ter da je 780 beguncem obljubljena preselitev.
On 15 June 2011, the European External Action Service reported to Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights that there were 6 000 people in the camps and that pledges had been made to resettle 780 refugees.
Ali nam lahko Komisija pove, katere države članice so se zavezale, da bodo sprejele begunce, in ali lahko na kratko poroča o razpravah, ki jih je imela s Svetom in državami članicami, da bi se omogočila večja solidarnost z begunci, ki so zbežali pred libijskim konfliktom, v katerega je vpletenih več držav članic?
Which Member States have made a commitment to take in refugees and what stage has been reached in discussions with the Council and Member States on providing greater support for refugees fleeing the Libyan conflict, in which several Member States are involved?
EU je še napovedala, da bo poleg človekoljubne pomoči zagotovila tudi pomoč za reševanje gospodarske in družbene krize, ki sta jo povzročila predvsem upad prihodkov iz turizma ter zmanjšanje trgovine z Libijo.
The European Union has also announced that, in addition to humanitarian aid, other resources will be made available to deal with the economic and social crisis triggered in particular by the drop in tourism revenue and the shrinking of trade with Libya.
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje je pododboru za človekove pravice potrdila, da sredstva še niso sproščena, čeprav so že bili opredeljeni finančni instrumenti, ki jih je treba uporabiti.
The EEAS confirmed to the Subcommittee on Human Rights that, whilst it was now clear which financial instruments would be used, the funds had not yet been released.
Ali lahko Komisija navede razloge za zamudo?
What are the reasons for the delay?
Ker bi lahko gospodarske in družbene razmere ogrozile krhki proces demokratične tranzicije, je treba nemudoma in brezpogojno sprostiti gospodarsko pomoč.
Economic aid needs to be released unconditionally as a matter of urgency, given that economic and social circumstances could threaten the fragile democratic transition process.
Kdaj bo ta izplačana?
When will the funds be released?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000162/2011
Question for oral answer O-000162/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Pomoč Evropske unije pri procesu demokratične tranzicije v Tuniziji
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: EU support for the democratic transition process in Tunisia
EU je od 14. januarja 2011 večkrat potrdila svojo zavezanost k podpori demokratičnemu procesu v Tuniziji., tako s podporo družbenogospodarskega razvoja kot tudi z znantno humanitarno pomočjo za sprejem več sto tisoč beguncev, ki so v Tunizijo prispeli po vstaji in spopadih v Libiji.
Since 14 January 2011, the European Union has repeatedly declared its readiness to support the democratic process in Tunisia by providing both socio-economic development aid and substantial humanitarian aid to fund reception arrangements for the hundreds of thousands of refugees who have arrived in Tunisia since the start of the uprising and conflict in Libya.
Katere države članice so se zavezale, da bodo sprejele begunce, in v kakšnem obsegu?
Which Member States have given undertakings to receive refugees, and how many?
Koliko preselitev je bilo doslej izvedenih?
How many refugees have been resettled so far?
Kako so napredovale razprave s Svetom in državami članicami, da bi omogočili večjo solidarnost z begunci, ki so zbežali pred konfliktom v Libiji, v katerega je vpletenih več držav članic?
What stage has been reached in discussions with the Council and Member States on providing greater support for refugees fleeing the Libyan conflict, in which several Member States are involved?
Kakšni programi financiranja in koliko sredstev so na voljo v podporo prizadevanjem Tunizije za sprejem beguncev?
What amounts have been made available under what financial programmes to support the efforts made by Tunisia to receive refugees?
Kateri programi financiranja se uporabljajo in koliko sredstev je predvidenih?
What amounts have been made available under which financial programmes?
Kakšni so razlogi za zamudo?
What are the reasons for the delay?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bi pospešila izplačila, in kdaj bo to storila?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to speed up the payments and in what timeframe?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000163/2011
Question for oral answer O-000163/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Informacijska vrzel v zvezi z izvorom konzerviranih ribjih proizvodov
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Information gap concerning the place of origin of canned fisheries products
V Uredbi (ES) št. 2065/2001 in Uredbi (ES) št. 104/2000 se od proizvajalcev svežih ribjih in ribogojnih proizvodov zahteva, naj končne uporabnike obvestijo o kraju ulova ali gojenja.
EU legislation (Regulation (EC) No 2065/2001 and Regulation (EC) No 104/2000) requires producers of fresh fisheries and aquaculture products to inform final consumers about the place of catch or farming of such products.
Za oznake na embalaži konzerviranih rib (zlasti tuna) pa je obvezno le navesti, kje je bila riba predelana, ne pa tudi, kje je bila ulovljena.
Labelling requirements for canned fish products (especially canned tuna) only oblige producers to state where the fish was processed, not where it was caught.
Informacije o kraju izvora na ribjih konzervah so izredno pomembne za informirano izbiro potrošnikov, če, recimo, želijo kupovati samo ribe, ulovljene s trajnostnimi metodami.
However, information on cans about the place of origin is essential if we want consumers to be able to make an informed choice if, for example, they do not wish to consume fish from non-sustainable fishing.
Poleg tega potrošniki potrebujejo informacijo o natančnem kraju izvora tudi zato, da bi se izognili nakupu proizvodov iz nezakonitega ribolova in/ali ribolova iz zelo onesnaženih voda (glej tudi številna nedavno vložena vprašanja za pisni odgovor na to temo).
Furthermore, consumers also need information about the exact place of origin in order to avoid buying fisheries products caught illegally (IUU) and/or originating from heavily contaminated waters (see also several written questions recently tabled concerning this issue).
Komisija je nedavno sprejela Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 297/2011, s katero uvaja posebne pogoje za uvoz krme in hrane, ki izvira iz Japonske ali je poslana iz nje po nesreči v jedrski elektrarni v Fukušimi, in Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 506/2011.
The Commission has recently adopted Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 297/2011, imposing special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan following the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station, and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 506/2011.
Rezultati omenjenih ukrepov se še niso pokazali, morda pa bodo imeli le omejen učinek.
However, the results of the above measures have not materialised yet and the measures may only have a limited effect.
Kako namerava Komisija zaščititi državljane EU pred uvoženimi konzerviranimi ribjimi proizvodi, ki so bili morda ulovljeni na nezakonit način ali v kontaminiranih vodah, so pa bili konzervirani v državah, ki so z Evropsko unijo podpisale sporazume o gospodarskem partnerstvu za uvoz teh proizvodov?
How does the Commission intend to protect EU citizens from imported canned fisheries products which may have been caught illegally and/or in contaminated waters but were canned in countries which have signed Economic Partnership Agreements with the EU providing for the import of tinned fisheries products?
Ali lahko navede, kakšne pravočasne ukrepe in ustrezno zakonodajo namerava sprejeti, da bi zagotovila, da bodo evropski potrošniki ustrezno informirani o natančnem kraju izvora konzerviranih ribjih proizvodov iz kontaminiranih območij?
Could the Commission say what timely measures and adequate legislation it intends to adopt in order to ensure that European consumers are adequately informed about the exact place of origin of canned fisheries products coming in particular from contaminated areas?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000164/2011
Question for oral answer O-000164/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Stanje pogajanj z Avstralijo, ZDA in Kanado o uporabi in prenosu podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR)
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: State of play regarding the negotiations with Australia, the US and Canada on the use and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data
Kakšni so sklepi pravnega mnenja, ki ga je podala pravna služba Komisije?
What conclusions does the Commission draw from the legal opinion of its own legal service?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000165/2011
Question for oral answer O-000165/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Stanje pogajanj z Avstralijo, ZDA in Kanado o uporabi in prenosu podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR)
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: State of play regarding the negotiations with Australia, the US and Canada on the use and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data
Ali Komisija meni, da je pogostost ad hoc uporabe metode „pull“ pridobivanja podatkov ameriških oblasti iz sistemov prevoznikov, ki že uporabljajo metodo „push“, v skladu z določbami obstoječega sporazuma z ZDA?
Does the Commission consider the frequency of ad hoc PULLs by the US authorities from the systems of carriers that are already using the PUSH method to be in line with the provisions of the existing agreement with the US?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000166/2011
Question for oral answer O-000166/2011
v imenu Odbora za pravne zadeve Zadeva: Haaška konferenca - ratifikacija konvencij
on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs Subject: The Hague Conference - ratification of conventions
Glede na svoje prejšnje izjave, ki so spodbujale delo Haaške konference, katere ukrepe je Komisija sprejela do sedaj in katere je predvidela v prihodnje, da bi spodbudila države članice k ratifikaciji haaških konvencij izpred leta 2000?
In view of its previous statements promoting the work of the Hague Conference, what measures has the Commission taken to date, and what further actions are envisaged, to encourage Member States to ratify the pre-2000 Hague Conventions.
Kako Komisija spodbuja tretje države, da bi pristopile k haaškim konvencijam, če upoštevamo, da je pristop v interesu državljanov EU?
What is the Commission doing to encourage non-member countries to accede to the Hague Conventions, given that this is in the interest of EU citizens?
Ali bo za to uporabila vire Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje?
Will it be using the resources of the European External Action Service (EEAS) to that end?
Ali bo osebje te službe usposobljeno in opremljeno tako, da bo lahko na terenu pomagalo državljanom in osrednjim organom pri praktičnem delu v zvezi s haaškimi konvencijami, zlasti konvencijo o ugrabitvah otrok?
Will EEAS staff be trained and equipped so as to able to assist citizens and central authorities with the practical workings of the Hague Conventions, particularly the child abduction convention, on the ground?
Ali namerava Komisija zagotoviti dodatno finančno pomoč za podporo sedanjih in prihodnjih projektov Haaške konference, zlasti kar zadeva mednarodno nadomestno materinstvo?
Does the Commission envisage providing supplementary financial support to sustain current and future projects of the Hague Conference, in particular with regard to international surrogacy?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000167/2011
Question for oral answer O-000167/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Podpora EU za begunce in proces prehoda v demokracijo v Tuniziji
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: EU support for refugees and for the democratic transition process in Tunisia
EU je napovedala, da bo od 14. januarja 2011 podpirala demokratični proces v Tuniziji.
The EU announced its commitment to supporting the democratic process in Tunisia as from 14 January 2011.
Humanitarno pomoč je priskrbela stotisočem beguncev, ki so prišli v Tunizijo po vstaji in spopadih v Libiji, pomagala pa je tudi pri vzpostavitvi begunskih taborišč ter vrnitvi državljanov tretjih držav v državo izvora.
It has delivered humanitarian aid for the reception of hundreds of thousands of refugees who have arrived in Tunisia since the uprising and the fighting in Libya, and has helped to set up refugee camps and repatriate third-country nationals to their countries of origin.
Predstavnik Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje je na seji pododbora Parlamenta za človekove pravice 15. junija 2011 poročal, da je v taboriščih ostalo 6000 oseb in da je bila 780 beguncem obljubljena preselitev.
On 15 June 2011, at a meeting of Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights, the European External Action Service (EEAS) representative reported that 6 000 persons remained in the camps and that pledges to resettle 780 refugees had been made.
Ali lahko Komisija navede, katere države članice so se zavezale, da bodo sprejele begunce?
Can the Commission indicate which Member States have pledged to take in refugees?
Ali lahko Parlament obvesti, kakšno je zdaj stanje glede razprav s Svetom in državami članicami o sprejemu beguncev, katerih primeri so bili sprejeti?
Can the Commission inform Parliament about the state of play on the discussions with the Council and the Member States on the reception of refugees whose cases have been accepted?
EU je napovedala tudi, da bo poleg humanitarne pomoči priskrbela finančno pomoč za obravnavanje gospodarske krize, do katere je prišlo zaradi upada prihodkov od turizma in zmanjšanja trgovine z Libijo.
The EU also announced that, in addition to humanitarian aid, financial support would be made available to address the economic crisis resulting from the fall in revenue from tourism and the decline in trade with Libya.
Ali lahko Komisija obvesti Parlament o datumu sprostitve sredstev?
Can the Commission inform Parliament about the date for release of the funds?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000168/2011
Question for oral answer O-000168/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Delovni pogoji za napotene delavce na gradbišču evropskega tlačnovodnega reaktorja v Flamanvilleu (Francija)
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Working conditions of posted workers in the EPR construction site in Flamanville (France)
Opozorjeni smo bili, da je bilo veliko delavcev iz številnih držav članic, ki jih je zaposlilo podjetje Atlanco, napotenih k stranki, podjetju Buygues, ki je podizvajalec podjetja EDF, na gradbišče jedrske elektrarne v Flamanville, kjer delajo in živijo v neprimernih in nevarnih pogojih ob pomanjkljivi socialni zaščiti, ter da kljub posredovanju nacionalnih in evropskih sindikatov obstaja možnost kršitve nacionalne zakonodaje in zakonodaje EU s področja dela in sociale.
It has come to our attention that a large number of posted workers from different Member States hired by the Atlanco company, seconded to the construction site of a plant in Flamanville for the Bouygues client company, which is a subcontractor of the EDF company, are suffering abusive and hazardous living and working conditions and a lack of social protection, and that, despite the intervention of national and European trade unions, there might be infringements of EU and national labour and social legislation.
Delavci različnih narodnosti, ki jih je podjetje Atlanco (agencija za zaposlovanje s sedežem na Irskem) zaposlilo v eni državi članici, so napoteni v tretjo državo članico (Francijo), plačo pa prejemajo prek sestrskega podjetja s sedežem na Cipru.
Posted workers of different nationalities are hired in one Member State by Atlanco (a recruitment agency based in Ireland), seconded to a third Member State (France) and paid through a sister company based in Cyprus.
Zaradi te nejasne situacije ne vedo, v kateri državi se plačujejo njihovi davki in socialni prispevki ali do kakšne socialne zaščite so upravičeni, če se prispevki sploh plačujejo.
As a result of this unclear situation, they do not know to which Member State the payment of their taxes and social contributions goes, or to which type of social protection they are entitled, if indeed contributions are paid.
Ali je Komisija seznanjena s temi težavami?
Is the Commission aware of these problems?
Kako zagotavlja, da se direktiva o napotenih delavcih v Franciji izvršuje in da delavci v celoti uživajo pravice, ki jim pripadajo, vključno s plačilom socialnih prispevkov in enake obravnave?
How is the Commission ensuring that France implements the Posting of Workers Directive and that workers enjoy the full rights they are entitled to, including social security payments and equal treatment?
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti, da bi preprečila uporabo direktive o napotitvi delavcev kot instrument za slabo ravnanje z delavci in slabšanje delovnih in socialnih pogojev?
What is the Commission planning to do in order to ensure that the Posting of Workers Directive is not used as an instrument to mistreat workers and undercut labour and social conditions?
Kako lahko Komisija zagotovi spoštovanje socialne in delovne zakonodaje, kadar so v delovno razmerje hkrati vpletene štiri države članice?
What can the Commission do to make sure social and labour legislation is respected when the employment relationship involves four different Member States at the same time?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000169/2011
Question for oral answer O-000169/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Javno naročilo
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Public Procurement
Komisija je 17. maja objavila, da je podjetju Microsoft oddala javno naročilo za „nakup Microsoftovih storitev na visoki ravni“, tj. za dobavo osebnih računalnikov za institucije in agencije EU ter prehod na operacijski sistem Windows 7.
On 17 May, the Commission published the award of a new contract with Microsoft for ‘the acquisition of Microsoft high-level services’ to supply PCs in the EU institutions and agencies with a migration to the Windows 7 operating system.
Skupna tržna vrednost naročila znaša 45 milijonov evrov.
The contract is worth a total of EUR 45 million in market value.
V obvestilu o oddaji naročila je bilo navedeno, da je bil uporabljen postopek s pogajanji in da obvestilo o naročilu ni bilo vnaprej objavljeno.
The publication of the contract states that the contract was entered into using a negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice.
V skladu s členom 89 (2) Finančne uredbe je treba za vsa javna naročila zagotoviti zbiranje ponudb iz najširšega močnega kroga ponudnikov, razen če se ne uporabi postopek s pogajanji iz člena 91(1)(d).
According to Article 89(2) of the Financial Regulation, ‘all procurement contracts shall be put out to tender on the broadest possible base, except when use is made of the negotiated procedure referred to in Article 91(1)(d)’.
Potemtakem se lahko postopek s pogajanji uporabi le v posebnih in omejenih okoliščinah.
Thus the negotiated procedure can be applied in specific and restricted circumstances.
V obvestilu o dodelitvi javnega naročila je navedeno, da je bila v tem primeru utemeljitev za postopek s pogajanji „tehnična“, saj sodelujoči organi že uporabljajo Microsoftove izdelke za del svoje informacijske infrastrukture, zagotavljanje storitev pa je predmet medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o licenciranju, ki ureja izdajanje pravic za zadevne proizvode.
The award of the contract states that in this case the justification for the negotiated procedure was ‘technical’, given that the participating bodies already use Microsoft products for part of the IT infrastructure and because the supply of services is subject to the Interinstitutional Licensing Agreement, which governs the licensing rights for the products concerned.
Komisija je hkrati vztrajno poudarjala, da postopek s pogajanji ni bil uporabljen zaradi tehnične prisiljenosti v nakup Microsoftovih izdelkov, kar je potrdila tudi v svojem odgovoru na pisno vprašanje P-003807/2011 : „Komisija se ne zanaša zgolj na enega ponudnika programske opreme in tudi ni prisiljena sodelovati samo z enim ponudnikom,“.
At the same time, the Commission has been adamant to point out that using the negotiated procedure was not the result of a technical lock-in to buy Microsoft, for instance in its response to written question P-003807/2011 : ‘The Commission does not rely on (or is locked into) one single software vendor.’
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, kako lahko trdi, da ne deluje v nasprotju z zastavljenimi cilji politike EU, če zatrjuje, da je bil postopek s pogajanji potreben zaradi tehničnih razlogov, hkrati pa poudarja, da ni prisiljena sodelovati z enim samim ponudnikom?
Could the Commission please explain how it is not inherently contradictory to argue for the negotiated procedure for technical reasons whilst not being locked-in, in contradiction with stated EU policy objectives?
Če so obstajale druge možnosti, zakaj potem ni bil objavljen javni razpis za pridobitev nove programske opreme?
If there are alternatives, what are the reasons for not subjecting the need for new software to an open competition?
V obvestilu o oddaji naročila je navedeno, da je bilo eno izmed meril tudi najnižja cena.
The award notification also states the award criterion as ‘lowest price’.
Vendar se poraja vprašanje, kako lahko Komisija oceni Microsoftovo ponudbo kot najcenejšo, če ni bil objavljen javni razpis in torej ni bilo nobene alternativne ponudbe?
However, how can the Commission assess Microsoft’s offer as the ‘lowest price’ when there has been no open competition and therefore there have been no alternative offers?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000170/2011
Question for oral answer O-000170/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Stanje pogajanj z Avstralijo, ZDA in Kanado o uporabi in prenosu podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR)
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: State of play regarding the negotiations with Australia, the US and Canada on the use and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data
Ali lahko zlasti pojasni, kako je ugotovila, da sta zbiranje in uporaba podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih v skladu z zakonskimi zahtevami o nujnosti in sorazmernosti?
Can the Commission explain in particular how it has established that the collection and use of PNR comply with the legal requirements of necessity and proportionality?
Ali bi bila Komisija pripravljena preučiti možnost takšne opredelitve glede na dejstvo, da bi enotno dogovorjene opredelitve profiliranja, ki bi tudi temeljile na veljavnih mednarodnih dokumentih, lahko pomagale pri ocenjevanju povezav med zbiranjem in obdelavo podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih ter dejavnostmi profiliranja?
Given that a uniform agreed definition of profiling, on the basis of international documents in force, could help to assess the links between the collection and processing of PNR data and profiling activities, would the Commission agree to work on such a definition?
Ali lahko Komisija podrobneje pojasni prihodnjo zakonodajo, ki predvideva sistematičen prenos PNR iz Kanade v ZDA?
Can the Commission give details of forthcoming legislation that makes provision for the systematic transfer of PNR from Canada to the US?
Kakšne bodo po mnenju Komisije posledice stališča njene pravne službe?
What does the Commission think the consequences of the legal opinion of its own legal service will be?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000171/2011
Question for oral answer O-000171/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Kraj izvora ribjih pločevink
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Place of origin of processed fishery products
Zakonodaja Unije (Uredba (ES) št. 2065/2001 in Uredba (ES) št. 104/2000) zahteva, da je pri svežih ribah in proizvodih iz ribogojstva potrošnik obveščen o kraju njihovega ulova ali gojenja.
Under the EU legislation in force, i.e. Regulation (EC) No 2065/2001and Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, consumers of fresh fish or aquaculture products should be informed of the products' place of catch or breeding.