natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0376/04
ORAL QUESTION H-0376/04
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju novembra 2004
for Question Time at the part-session in November 2004
v skladu s členom 109 Poslovnika
pursuant to Rule 109 of the Rules of Procedure
za Svet
to the Council
Zadeva: Težave evropskih podjetij pri izvozu v Združene države Amerike
Subject: Difficulties encountered by European firms as regards exports to the United States
V zadnjem času sem dobil več informacij o tem, da carinski organi v ZDA zaradi poostrenih varnostnih ukrepov na meji potrebujejo zelo veliko časa za pregledovanje blaga evropskih podjetij, s čimer podaljšujejo njihove dobavne roke in zvišujejo stroške delovanja.
I have recently received increasing reports that, because of tighter border security measures, the US customs authorities need a great deal of time to inspect goods produced by European firms, resulting in longer delivery times and higher operating costs.
Ker ni mogoče izvedeti v kolikšnem času bo blago pregledano, nastanejo zamude pri dobavi.
Because it is impossible to tell how long goods will take to inspect, delivery is delayed.
Zanima me, kaj namerava Svet Evropske unije v okviru svojih pristojnosti storiti, da bi omogočil lažje poslovanje evropskih podjetij v ZDA?
What will the Council do, within its area of responsibility, to enable European firms to trade more easily in the US?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR H-0112/05
ORAL QUESTION H-0112/05
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju marca 2005
for Question Time at the part-session in March 2005
za Komisijo
to the Commission
Zadeva: Administrativna reforma evropskih institucij
Subject: Administrative reform of the European institutions
Po javnomnenjskih raziskavah so evropske institucije v očeh državljanov veliki birokratski centri, ki imajo veliko moč in za svoje delovanje porabijo veliko davkoplačevalskega denarja.
Opinion polls show that citizens see the European institutions as big bureaucratic centres which have a lot of power and are run with a lot of taxpayers’ money.
Prodijeva komisija se je lotila tega vprašanja in za administrativno reformo evropskih institucij je bil zadolžen komisar Kinnock.
The Prodi Commission began to tackle this problem and Commissioner Kinnock was put in charge of administrative reform of the European institutions.
Ali se je t.i.
Is it in progress?
"Kinnockova reforma" sploh začela, ali je v teku ali pa je morda že zaključena?
Or has it perhaps already been completed?
Če je že zaključena, kakšni so njeni učinki?
And if it has been completed, what effects has it had?
Koliko je po vašem mnenju v predpisih EU nepotrebnih administrativnih ovir?
In your opinion, how many unnecessary administrative obstacles are there in EU regulations?
Ali nameravate pripraviti svoj program ukrepov proti t.i. "red-tape"?
Do you intend to draw up a programme of measures to combat red tape?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0541/05
ORAL QUESTION H-0541/05
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju julija 2005
for Question Time at the part-session in July 2005
Zadeva: Težave ponudnikov iger na srečo pri oglaševanju svoje dejavnosti v drugih državah članicah EU
Subject: Difficulties experienced by organisers of games of chance in advertising their activities in other Member States
Avstrija je leta 2003 spremenila nacionalno zakonodajo in uzakonila prepoved oglaševanja vseh iger na srečo, ki se ne izvajajo na njenem ozemlju.
In 2003 Austria changed its national legislation to introduce a ban on advertising all games of chance not carried out within its territory.
Na podlagi 56. člena Zakona o igrah na srečo Republika Avstrija prepoveduje oglaševanje igralniških storitev ponudnikom drugih držav članic EU medtem, ko sama dovoljuje oglaševanje teh istih storitev domačim igralniškim operaterjem, ki lahko svoje storitve nemoteno oglašujejo tako v starih kot novih članicah EU.
Pursuant to Article 56 of its Games of Chance Act, Austria prohibits the advertising of games of chance by operators from other Member States, while permitting the advertising of those same services by domestic operators, which are freely able to advertise their services in both old and new Member States.
Menim, da ta določba avstrijske zakonodaje ni v skladu s pravnim redom EU, saj diskriminira na podlagi državljanstva oz. države izvajalca storitev.
I believe that this provision in Austrian legislation does not comply with EU law as it discriminates on the basis of the citizenship or country of the service provider.
Zanima me, kaj bo Evropska komisija storila, da bi Republika Avstrija prenehala s tem diskriminatornim ravnanjem do začetka njenega predsedovanja EU v začetku leta 2006.
What does the Commission intend to do to ensure that Austria ends this discriminatory practice by the time it takes over the EU presidency at the start of 2006?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0725/05
ORAL QUESTION H-0725/05
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju septembra II 2005
for Question Time at the part-session in September II 2005
Zadeva: Težave ponudnikov iger na srečo pri oglaševanju svoje dejavnosti v nekaterih državah članicah Evropske unije
Subject: Difficulties experienced by gaming operators in advertising their activities in certain EU Member States
Meseca julija sem Evropski komisiji zastavil vprašanje, povezano s težavami slovenskih ponudnikov iger na srečo pri oglaševanju svoje dejavnosti v Republiki Avstriji.
In July I tabled a question to the Commission concerning the difficulties experienced by Slovenian gaming operators in advertising their activities in Austria.
V odgovoru je Evropska komisija povedala, da bo proučila avstrijski zakon (spremenjen leta 2003), ki prepoveduje oglaševanje tujih ponudnikov iger na srečo v Avstriji, in ugotovila njegovo združljivost z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
In its reply, the Commission stated that it would examine the Austrian law (amended in 2003) which bans foreign gaming operators from advertising in Austria, and would establish whether or not it is compatible with Community legislation.
Zanima me, kaj je v treh mesecih, od kar sem zastavil prvo vprašanje, Evropska komisija ugotovila?
What has the Commission ascertained in the three months since I tabled that initial question?
Komisijo želim spomniti, da Avstrija tujim ponudnikom iger na srečo prepoveduje in onemogoča oglaševanje svoje dejavnosti na njenem ozemlju, prepoved pa ne velja za domače ponudnike.
May I remind the Commission that while Austria prohibits and prevents foreign gaming operators from advertising their business in Austria, no such ban applies to national operators.
Avstrija s tem očitno ščiti ekonomske interese domačih ponudnikov in ovira tuje turistične operaterje na skupnem evropskem trgu.
Austria is clearly protecting the economic interests of national providers and obstructing foreign tourism operators in the single European market.
Gre za kršitev temeljnih načel svobodnega trga, še posebej pa 49. člena Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ki se nanaša na prost pretok storitev.
This is a breach of the fundamental principles of a free market, and in particular of Article 49 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which concerns the freedom to provide services.
Zanima me, kaj bo na tem področju storila Evropska komisija, da bi diskriminacijo onemogočila in preprečila še pred začetkom predsedovanja Republike Avstrije EU 1. januarja 2006?
What does the Commission intend to do in this area to end such discrimination before Austria’s EU presidency begins on 1 January 2006?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0729/05
ORAL QUESTION H-0729/05
Zadeva: Gospodarske prevare
Subject: Commercial fraud
Seveda to še zdaleč ni edina oblika "modernih" prevar v gospodarstvu.
Of course, this is far from being the only form of ‘modern’ business scam.
Kako in kdaj namerava Komisija ukrepati na področju gospodarskih prevar ter kaj namerava narediti za povečanje obveščenosti evropskih državljanov o možnostih prevar?
What does the Commission intend to do, and when, to tackle commercial fraud and how does it intend to raise European citizens’ awareness of the possibility of such fraud?
Kakšno je mnenje Komisije o tem, da bi zakonodaja, ki trenutno ščiti potrošnika na področju prodaje na daljavo, v prihodnosti veljala tudi za druge oblike poslovanja ter poslovnega trženja?
What is the Commission’s view of the possibility of applying the legislation which currently protects consumers in distance selling transactions to other forms of business and marketing?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0844/05
ORAL QUESTION H-0844/05
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju oktobra 2005
for Question Time at the part-session in October 2005
Zadeva: kako Komisija zagotavlja, da se z denarjem državljana EU dosega cilj varstva in krepitve človekovih pravic v svetu? ?
Subject: How the Commission ensures that EU public funds help in the protection and promotion of human rights throughout the world?
Čeprav Evropska unija izrecno spoštuje človekove pravice, se zunanja pomoč še naprej daje državam, ki znova in znova zanemarjajo mednarodne standarde, kot so na primer določeni v Ženevski konvenciji.
Although the European Union strictly respects human rights, foreign aid continues to be given to countries that repeatedly ignore international standards such as those laid down in the Geneva Convention.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-1095/05
ORAL QUESTION H-1095/05
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju decembra 2005
for Question Time at the part-session in December 2005
Zadeva: Problem 18.305 posameznikov, ki so bili leta 1992 nezakonito odstranjeni ("izbrisani") iz državnega registra stalnih prebivalcev
Subject: Problem of the 18 305 individuals who were unlawfully removed ('erased') from the country's registry of permanent residents in 1992
S tem ko je slovenska vlada napovedala, da bo to zadevo uredila s posebnim ustavnim zakonom, je nakazala, da odločitve ustavnega sodišča ne namerava izpolniti.
By announcing its intention to regulate the matter in a special 'Constitutional Act', the Slovenian Government indicated that it does not intend to comply with the Constitutional Court ruling.
Ali je komisija seznanjena z dejstvom, da so se pred desetimi leti podobna neupoštevanja odločitev ustavnega sodišča v Avstriji prenehala, potem ko je tovrstno dejanje ostro kritiziral tedanji predsednik nemškega ustavnega sodišča Roman Herzog?
Is the Commission informed that similar 'by-passing' of the rulings of the Constitutional Court was abandoned in Austria ten years ago after it had been severely criticized by Mr Roman Herzog, then President of the German Constitutional Court?
Ali namerava Evropska komisija s konkretnimi ukrepi zagotoviti, da bo Slovenija izpolnila standarde in pravni red EU glede na to, da so bile več tisočim ljudem, med katerimi je veliko takšnih romskega porekla, odtujene njihove osnovne človekove pravice?
Does the European Commission intend to take tangible measures to ensure that Slovenia implements EU standards and its body of law, given that thousands of people, many of them of Roma origin, are still being denied their basic human rights?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0043/06
ORAL QUESTION H-0043/06
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju februarja 2006
for Question Time at the part-session in February 2006
Zadeva: Prost pretok oseb
Subject: Free movement of persons
To so temeljne svoboščine in EU bo težko razvila svoje potenciale, če teh svoboščin ne bo zagotavljala vsem državljanom.
These are fundamental freedoms and the EU will struggle to fulfil its potential if they are not extended to each and every citizen.
Letos potečeta dve leti prehodnega obdobja, ki so ga nekatere države članice uveljavile glede prostega pretoka oseb ob širitvi EU v letu 2004.
This year will see the end of the two-year transitional period in relation to the free flow of persons introduced by certain Member States at the time of the 2004 enlargement.
Zanima me, kakšno je stališče avstrijskega predsedstva do odločitve nekaterih držav, da bodo prehodno obdobje podaljšale še za tri leta?
What is the Austrian Presidency’s position on the decision by certain countries to extend the transitional period for a further three years?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0199/06
ORAL QUESTION H-0199/06
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju marca 2006
for Question Time at the part-session in March 2006
Julija in septembra 2005 sem Komisiji zastavil vprašanje povezano z očitnimi težavami slovenskih ponudnikov iger na srečo pri oglaševanju svoje dejavnosti v Republiki Avstriji.
In July and September 2005 I tabled questions to the Commission concerning the evident difficulties experienced by Slovenian gaming operators in advertising their activities in Austria.
Podjetje iz Slovenije je nedavno na komisarja McCreevya naslovilo uradno pritožbo zaradi neupravičenega omejevanja prostega pretoka storitev v turističnem sektorju s prošnjo, da se zaradi te kršitve sproži uradni postopek zoper Republiko Avstrijo.
A Slovenian company recently submitted an official complaint to Commissioner McCreevy concerning this unjustified restriction on the freedom to provide services in the tourism sector, together with a request for an official procedure to be initiated against Austria over this infringement.
Komisijo želim spomniti, da npr. slovensko podjetje Hit Nova Gorica, ki se ukvarja z igrami na srečo, ne sme oglaševati svoje dejavnosti na ozemlju Republike Avstrije, za avstrijske operaterje pa takšna omejitev ne velja.
I would like to remind the Commission that, for example, the Slovenian company Hit Nova Gorica, which operates games of chance, is not permitted to advertise its activities in Austria, while no such restriction applies to Austrian operators.
Avstrija s tem krši temeljna načela svobodne trgovine, še posebej pa 49. člen Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ki se nanaša na prost pretok storitev.
Austria is thereby infringing the basic principles of free trade, and in particular Article 49 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which concerns the freedom to provide services.
Zanima me, kaj je Komisija ugotovila na podlagi dokumentacije in obrazložitve praktičnega primera, ki ga je posredovalo slovensko podjetje.
What has the Commission ascertained on the basis of the documents and detailed account submitted by the aforementioned Slovenian company with regard to this practical example?
Ali je Komisija proučila avstrijski zakon (spremenjen leta 2003) in ugotovila njegovo združljivost z zakonodajo Skupnosti?
Has the Commission examined the Austrian law (amended in 2003) to determine whether it is in compliance with Community law?
Zanima me tudi, kakšna je odločitev Komisije v zvezi s sprožitvijo postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev Republike Avstrije.
What has the Commission decided on the question of initiating an infringement procedure against Austria?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0230/06
ORAL QUESTION H-0230/06
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju aprila 2006
for Question Time at the part-session in April 2006
Zadeva: Skupina na visoki ravni za konkurenčnost, energijo in okolje
Subject: High Level Group on Competitiveness, Energy and the Environment
Ugotavljam, da med njimi ni niti enega predstavnika iz novih držav članic.
I note that not one of those representatives is from the new Member States.
Zato sprašujem Komisijo:
Therefore I have the following questions for the Commission:
Kakšen je namen delovne skupine in katere so njene naloge?
What is the purpose of the High Level Group and what are its tasks?
Kakšne so pristojnosti skupine?
What powers does the Group have?
Ali Komisija meni, da med starimi in novimi državami članicami ni bistvenih razlik, ki bi zahtevale tudi primerno geografsko sestavo skupine na visoki ravni?
Does the Commission believe there are no substantial differences between the new and old Member States that would require the High Level Group also to have a suitable geographical composition?
Kako bo skupina lahko dajala pobude za usklajeno zakonodajno delovanje, ki bodo upoštevale dejansko stanje v EU–25 in bodo poštene ter enako prijazne in zahtevne do novih ter starih držav članic?
How will the Group be able to put forward initiatives for harmonised legislative activity that take into account the actual situation in the EU-25 and are fair and equally agreeable to and demanding of both new and old Member States?
Kako namerava Komisija spodbuditi sinergijo delovanja EU–25 pri doseganju ciljev Lizbonske strategije?
How does the Commission intend to encourage synergy among the EU-25 in seeking to achieve the goals of the Lisbon Strategy?
Bo ustanovila še dodatno skupino, v kateri bodo predstavniki interesnih skupin iz starih držav članic?
Does the Commission intend to set up another group containing representatives of interest groups from the old Member States?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0403/06
ORAL QUESTION H-0403/06
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju maja 2006
for Question Time at the part-session in May 2006
Zadeva: Sestava Skupine na visoki ravni za konkurenčnost, energijo in okolje
Subject: Composition of the High Level Group on Competitiveness, Energy and the Environment
Na aprilskem plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta sem Evropski komisiji zastavila vprašanje o namenu, pristojnostih in sestavi »Skupine na visoki ravni za konkurenčnost, energijo in okolje«.
At Parliament’s April part-session I put a question to the Commission concerning the purpose, powers and composition of the High Level Group on Competitiveness, Energy and the Environment.
Komisija pojasnjuje, da v Skupini na visoki ravni ni strokovnjakov iz novih držav članic, ker so bili člani v skupino povabljeni osebno, na podlagi svojih strokovnih izkušenj, in ne zastopajo svojih domačih vlad.
The Commission explained that there were no experts from the new Member States in the High Level Group because the members of the group had been invited ad personam on the basis of their professional experience, and that they did not represent their national governments.
Komisija je "skušala zbrati strokovnjake na področju konkurenčnosti, energetike in okolja, pri čemer geografska razporeditev in nacionalni interesi niso igrali nikakršne vloge".
The Commission stated that it had attempted to gather together experts in the areas of competitiveness, energy and the environment and that geographical distribution and national interests had played no part whatsoever.
Ob tovrstnem odgovoru me zanima naslednje:
In view of this answer, I have the following questions.
Ali Komisija meni, da v novih državah članicah EU ni ustreznih strokovnjakov na področju industrije, energije in okolja, ki so strokovno enakovredni in bi lahko sodelovali s strokovnjaki iz EU-15?
Does the Commission believe that there are no suitable experts in the new Member States who have equal expertise in the areas of industry, energy and the environment and who could work together with experts from the EU-15?
Kateri konkretno so bili kriteriji, na podlagi katerih je Komisija izbrala strokovnjake?
On what specific criteria did the Commission base its choice of experts?
Ali Komisija meni, da bo zbiranje informacij strokovnjakov iz EU-15 o stanju v vseh članicah EU dovolj za zmanjšanje trenutno velikih razlik med t.i. starimi in novimi članicami na omenjenih področjih?
Does the Commission believe that experts from the EU-15 gathering information on the situation in all EU Member States will be sufficient to reduce the current large disparities between the so-called old and new Member States in the areas mentioned above?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0561/06
ORAL QUESTION H-0561/06
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju julija 2006
for Question Time at the part-session in July 2006
Zadeva: Dejavnosti Komisije na področju miroljubne uporabe jedrske energije
Subject: The Commission's activities with regard to the peaceful use of nuclear energy
Energija stopa vse bolj v ospredje političnih razprav v Evropski uniji, tudi kadar govorimo o gospodarski rasti, zaposlovanju in doseganju drugih ciljev lizbonske strategije.
Energy is increasingly taking centre stage in political debate in the European Union, not least whenever we talk about economic growth, employment and the achievement of the other objectives of the Lisbon strategy.
Znano je, da jedrska energija predstavlja 30% vse električne energije v EU, ne proizvaja toplogrednih plinov in porazdeli našo odvisnost od uvoza.
It is known that nuclear energy accounts for 30% of all electricity in the EU, it does not produce greenhouse gases and it spreads our dependence on imports.
Ob sočasni skrbi za čim višjo stopnjo jedrske varnosti in ustrezno usposobljenost človeških virov lahko jedrska energija postane izredno pomemben del evropske energetske mešanice prihodnosti.
At the same time as prompting concerns about the highest level of nuclear safety and about appropriately qualified human resources, nuclear energy may be an exceptionally important component in Europe's future energy mix.
Evropski parlament na področju miroljubne uporabe jedrske energije nima pravice do soodločanja, zato je pravočasna izmenjava informacij o oblikovanju politik tu še toliko pomembnejša.
The European Parliament has no right of codecision with regard to the peaceful use of nuclear energy, so that the timely exchange of information about the framing of policy in this area is all the more important.
Zanima me, katere so oziroma bodo dejavnosti Komisije na področju miroljubne uporabe jedrske energije?
I should like to know what the Commission's activities with regard to the peaceful use of nuclear energy are or will be.
Ali morda načrtuje nove ukrepe?
Is the Commission planning any new measures?
In kako namerava na tem področju in pri načrtovanju dejavnosti sodelovati z Evropskim parlamentom, da bo to sodelovanje čim bolj učinkovito?
And how does the Commission intend to work together with the European Parliament in this area, and in framing its planned activities, to ensure the most effective cooperation?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0671/06
ORAL QUESTION H-0671/06
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju septembra I 2006
for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2006
Zadeva: Plinski terminali v Tržaškem zalivu
Subject: Gas terminals in the Gulf of Trieste
Študije o možnih posledicah gradnje in obratovanja dveh plinskih terminalov v Tržaškem zalivu in njegovem obalnem območju jasno kažejo na to, da bodo imeli predvideni projekti, ki potekajo v Republiki Italiji, dejansko številne čezmejne vplive.
Studies into the potential consequences of the construction and operation of two gas terminals in the Gulf of Trieste and the adjacent coastal area clearly show that these planned projects in Italy will have numerous transboundary effects.
Vlada Republike Slovenije je ugotovila, da Republika Italija ni upoštevala določb 7. člena direktive 2001/42/ES o presoji vplivov nekaterih planov in programov na okolje, 3. člena konvencije o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje ter 7. člena direktive 85/337/EGS o presoji vplivov določenih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje, dopolnjene z direktivo 97/11/ES.
The Slovenian Government has established that Italy has failed to comply with the provisions of Article 7 of Directive 2001/42/EC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, Article 3 of the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context and Article 7 of Directive 85/337/EEC , amended by Directive 97/11/EC , on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment.
Italija prav tako ni upoštevala 4. člena konvencije o čezmejnih vplivih industrijskih nesreč.
Italy has also failed to comply with Article 4 of the Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents.
28 UL L 197, 21.7.2001, str.
13 OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p.
29 UL L 175, 5.7.1985, str.
14 OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
30 UL L 73, 14.3.1997, str.
15 OJ L 73, 14.3.1997, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0819/06
ORAL QUESTION H-0819/06
v času vprašanj, na delnem zasedanju oktobra 2006
for Question Time at the part-session in October 2006
Zadeva: Nova časovnica za uvedbo druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II).
Subject: New timetable for introducing the second-generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)