natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pogodba o delovanju o Evropski unije in Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah odražata to prepričanje.
The TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU echo this conviction.
Vendar pa je nedavna študija, ki jo je v desetih državah članicah opravila Agencija Evropske unije za temeljne pravice , pokazala, da se nacionalne prakse po dostopu nezakonitih migrantov do zdravstvenega varstva močno razlikujejo.
Nonetheless, a recent study of ten Member States by the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) has shown that national practices with regard to access to healthcare of irregular migrants are widely diverging.
V šestih državah članicah, kjer je potekala študija, nezakoniti migranti razen v nujnih primerih nimajo dostopa do brezplačnih javnih zdravstvenih storitev.
In six of those Member States studied, irregular migrants have no cost-free access to public healthcare services beyond emergency care.
V eni državi članici je zdravstvena oskrba dostopna, vendar pa morajo bolnice prijaviti državnim organom nezakonite migrante.
In one of these Member States healthcare is available but hospitals have to report irregular migrants to national authorities.
Zaradi strahu, da jih bodo odkrili, se nezakoniti migrante raje odločajo, da tvegajo svoje zdravje.
Consequently, irregular migrants choose to put their health at risk because of their fear of being discovered.
Države članice se bojijo morebitnih stroškov brezplačnega zdravstvenega varstva nezakonitih migrantov.
Member States dread the potential costs of free healthcare for irregular migrants.
Vendar pa večje vlaganje v osnovno zdravstveno varstvo za vse pomeni nižje stroške drage medicinske oskrbe v nujnih primerih, pa tudi manjše tveganje za javno zdravje.
However, the more one invests in free basic healthcare for all, the smaller the costs of expensive emergency care as well as the risks to public health are.
Pravica do osnovnega zdravstvenega varstva je temeljna pravica, ne glede na status osebe.
The right to basic health care is a fundamental right regardless of the person’s status.
To odgovornost mora prevzeti država, ne pa nevladne organizacije in civilna družba, kot je sedaj praksa v več državah članicah, ki ne omogočajo polnega dostopa do osnovnega zdravstvenega varstva.
The state must assume this responsibility instead of NGOs and civil society, as is currently the practice in several Member States which do not grant full access to basic health care.
Ali lahko Komisija pripravi celovito študijo praks na področju dostopa do zdravstvenega varstva za nezakonite migrante v vseh 27 državah članicah?
Can the Commission present a comprehensive study examining all the 27 Member States’ practices relating to access to healthcare for irregular migrants?
Še zlasti, ali lahko Komisija pripravi grobo oceno, koliko bi letno stala brezplačno zdravstveno varstvo v Evropski uniji za nezakonite migrante?
In particular, can the Commission provide a rough estimate of how much free healthcare for irregular migrants in the EU would cost annually?
Ali lahko Komisija potrdi ali zanika kakršno koli povezavo med brezplačnim zdravstvenim varstvom v nekaterih državah članicah in številom nezakonitih migrantov v teh državah?
Can the Commission confirm or reject any correlation between free healthcare in some Member States and the number of irregular migrants in those countries?
Z drugimi besedami, ali obstajajo dokazi, da je brezplačno zdravstveno varstvo med dejavniki privlačnosti?
In other words, is there any evidence that free healthcare acts as a pull-factor?
Ob koncu, ali lahko Komisija podrobno opiše vpliv študije Agencije na določbe o zdravstvenem varstvu, o katerih trenutno potekajo pogajanja v okviru svežnja direktiv o azilnem postopku in sprejemu iskalcev azila?
Finally, can the Commission detail what impact the FRA study has on the healthcare provisions currently negotiated in the asylum package’s procedures and reception directives?
Agencija Evropske unije za temeljne pravice, Migranti z neurejenim statusom: dostop do zdravstvenega varstva v 10 državah članicah Evropske unije, Dunaj 2011.
FRA, Migrants in an irregular situation: access to healthcare in 10 European Union Member States, Vienna 2011.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000302/2011
Question for oral answer O-000302/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Preglednost in pravičnost v verigi preskrbe s hrano
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Transparency and fairness in the food supply chain
Kmetijski sektor je v krizi, kmetje in kmetijska podjetja se soočajo z naraščajočimi stroški proizvodnje, ki presegajo njihove finančne zmogljivosti in se ne odražajo v njihovih prejemkih.
There is an ongoing crisis in the agriculture sector, with farmers and agricultural enterprises facing rising and unaffordable production costs which are not reflected in what farmers receive in return.
Če se kmetom ne bo zagotovilo pravično plačilo za njihove pridelke, bodo številni opustili kmetovanje.
If farmers are not guaranteed a fair price for their produce, many of them will leave the sector.
Evropska unija si mora kot prednostno nalogo zastaviti pravično in dostojno plačilo kmetom, sicer nam grozi opuščanje številnih malih kmetij.
A fair, decent wage for farmers must be an EU priority otherwise we risk the abandonment of many small farms.
Kmetje in njihove organizacije morajo pridobiti precej večjo pogajalsko moč, potrebujemo pa tudi pravičnost in preglednost v verigi preskrbe s hrano, ki bo onemogočila zlorabe velikih kupcev.
Farmers and their organisations need to see a significant increase in their bargaining power and we need fairness and transparency in the food chain to avoid big-buyer abuses.
Parlament je v svojih poročilih, na primer v poročilu Joséja Bovéja o bolje delujoči verigi preskrbe s hrano v Evropi, jasno izrazil svoje mnenje o tej temi.
Parliament has made its opinion on these matters clear through reports such as Jose Bové’s ‘A better functioning food supply chain in Europe’.
Vendar se razmere še naprej slabšajo.
However, the situation continues to deteriorate.
Cena, ki jo plačajo potrošniki, se ne odraža v plačilu kmetom.
The price paid by consumers is not reflected in the price paid to farmers.
Kako bo Komisija reševala to vprašanje, ki je temeljnega pomena za Evropski parlament in živilskopredelovalno industrijo?
How will the Commission address this issue, which is of fundamental importance to both the European Parliament and the agri-food industry?
Kako se bo Komisija lotila zlorab velikih kupcev v verigi preskrbe s hrano?
How will the Commission tackle ‘big buyer’ abuses in the food supply chain?
Kaj namerava storiti, da bi zagotovila pravičnost v odnosih med proizvajalci, trgovci na drobno in dobavitelji?
What will it do to ensure fairness in the relationship between food producers retailers and suppliers?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen glede zahteve Evropskega parlamenta po preglednosti na tem področju in glede predloga Komisije, naj se nacionalnim varuhom človekovih pravic priporoči spremljanje razmer na tem področju?
What progress has been made on the European Parliament’s request for transparency in this area and the suggestion for the Commission to recommend national ombudsmen to monitor the situation in this area?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000303/2011
Question for oral answer O-000303/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Nova skupna ribiška politika in trajnostni razvoj ribogojskega sektorja
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: The new CFP and sustainable development of the aquaculture sector
Ribogojski sektor je prispeval velik delež k povečanju proizvodnje rib, ki se porabijo v Evropi, kar se kaže tudi v precejšnjem porastu uvoza iz tretjih držav.
The aquaculture sector accounts for a growing proportion of the fish consumed in Europe, and imports from third countries have been steadily increasing.
V predlogu reforme skupne ribiške politike je Komisija zapisala, da bi morala ta politika v prihodnje „podpirati trajnostni okoljski, gospodarski in socialni razvoj sektorja ribogojstva“.
In its proposal for reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, the Commission stated that the CFP ‘should support the environmentally, economically and socially sustainable development of the aquaculture industry’.
Da bi bilo to mogoče uresničiti, je treba odločno podpreti znanstvene raziskave in tehnološki razvoj na področju gojenja vrst, po možnosti avtohtonih, kar bo omogočilo v celoti izkoristiti vse potenciale te dejavnosti, vključno z oblikovanjem novih delovnih mest, preseči še preostale ovire in ustrezno omejiti okoljske vplive.
This will require substantial support for scientific research and technological development in the area of fish farming, especially of native species, realising the sector’s full potential, in terms of generating new jobs, overcoming its present limitations and keeping its environmental impact to a minimum.
Trajnostni razvoj ribogojskega sektorja v državah članicah bi moral prinesti diverzifikacijo proizvodnje in ponudbe ter izboljšanje kakovosti, kar bo zagotovilo tudi zanesljivejšo oskrbo.
Sustainable development of the sector in the Member States should enable production and the supply of foodstuffs to be diversified and their quality improved while also making for greater food security.
Ali lahko Komisija odgovori na naslednji vprašanji:
Given the above, the Commission is asked to answer the following:
Kako namerava Komisija v strateških smernicah za omenjeni sektor ustrezno upoštevati geografske, območne, kulturne in socialno-ekonomske posebnosti posameznih držav članic?
How does the Commission intend to take due account, in its strategic guidelines for this sector, of the geographical, territorial, cultural and socioeconomic specificities of each Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000304/2011
Question for oral answer O-000304/2011
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Globalni odziv EU na virus HIV/AIDS
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: EU global response to HIV/AIDS
Komisija je sprejela sporočilo o boju proti virusu HIV/aidsu v Evropski uniji in sosednjih državah za obdobje 2009–2013 ter spremljajoči akcijski načrt, da bi do leta 2013 v vseh evropskih državah zmanjšali nove okužbe z virusom HIV.
The Commission adopted its Communication on ‘Combating HIV/AIDS in the European Union and neighbouring countries, 2009-2013’ and its accompanying Action Plan with a view to reducing new HIV infections across all European countries by 2013.
V sporočilu je opredelila glavne prednostne naloge, med drugim boljši dostop do preventive, zdravljenja in oskrbe ter izboljšanje kakovosti življenja ljudi z virusom HIV.
It identified key priorities including improving access to prevention, treatment and care, as well as improving the quality of life of people living with HIV.
Tako je povzela številna glavna priporočila iz resolucije Parlamenta iz novembra 2008 o virusu HIV/aidsu: zgodnje odkrivanje in zgodnje zdravljenje, med drugim širši dostop do testiranja na virus HIV, da bi preprečili prenašanje virusa, saj 30 % okuženih z virusom HIV ne ve, da so okuženi.
This reflected a number of the key recommendations included in the Parliament’s resolution of November 2008 on ‘HIV/AIDS: Early Diagnosis and Early Care’, including greater access to HIV testing in order to prevent transmission of the virus, given that 30 % of those infected with HIV are unaware that they have the virus.
Ali lahko Komisija glede na to, da se bliža vmesni pregled akcijskega načrta, predstavi dosedanji napredek, vključno z uresničevanjem priporočil in smernic o testiranju na virus HIV, ki jih je izdal Evropski center za preprečevanje in nadzor bolezni decembra 2010?
Given that we are now approaching a mid-term review of the Action Plan, can the Commission outline the progress which has been made to date, including uptake of the recommendations of the ECDC Guidance on HIV testing issued in December 2010?
- Ali namerava Komisija glede na zadnje spremembe na tem področju posodobiti strategijo boja proti virusu HIV/aidsu v Evropski uniji in sosednjih državah, zlasti kar zadeva preprečevanje, dostop do diagnoze in testiranje?
- Is the Commission intending to update the strategy to combat HIV/AIDS in the European Union and neighbouring countries in light of new developments, notably when it comes to prevention, access to diagnosis and testing?
- Ali lahko Komisija po letošnjem zasedanju na visoki ravni o virusu HIV/aidsu generalne skupščine ZN, ki je potekalo od 8. do 10. junija 2011 v New Yorku ob deseti obletnici po prelomnem izrednem zasedanju Generalne skupščine ZN o virusu HIV/aidsu, pojasni, kako namerava uskladiti strategijo EU o virusu HIV/aidsu v EU in sosednjih državah s širšim globalnim odzivom EU na virus HIV/aids?
- In advance of the 2011 UN General Assembly High Level Meeting on AIDS from 8–10 June 2011 in New York, marking 10 years since the landmark UN General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS, can the Commission explain how it intends to coordinate its EU strategy on HIV/AIDS in the EU and neighbouring countries and its broader EU global response to HIV/AIDS?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000305/2011
Question for oral answer O-000305/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Jajca iz reje v neustreznih kletkah
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Eggs from non-compliant cages
V skladu z Direktivo 1999/74/ES bo uporaba običajnih kletk za kokoši nesnice od 1. januarja 2012 prepovedana.
From 1 January 2012, the use of ‘conventional cages’ for laying hens will be banned in accordance with Directive 1999/74/EC.
Komisar John Dalli je 5. oktobra 2011 v nagovoru Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja priznal, da številne države do tega roka ne bodo v celoti odpravile uporabe teh „neizpopolnjenih“ kletk.
Commissioner Dalli, when addressing the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development on 5 October 2011, admitted that many countries will not have fully done away with these ‘unenriched’ cages by that deadline.
Potrjeno je bilo tudi, da nekatere države članice niso priskrbele nobenih podatkov v zvezi z izpolnjevanjem te obveznosti in da je Španija denimo zaprosila za podaljšanje roka do leta 2014.
It was also confirmed that some Member States had not provided any data regarding their compliance, and that Spain in particular had asked for the deadline to be extended until 2014.
Zato ne gre pričakovati, da bodo vse države članice do omenjenega roka izpolnile obveznosti direktive.
It is therefore likely that not all Member States will comply with the directive by the above deadline.
Če se ta direktiva ne bo ustrezno izvajala, bo prišlo do izkrivljanja trgovine med državami, ki izpolnjujejo obveznosti, in tistimi, ki jih ne, pa tudi do resnih posledic na področju pravic živali.
Failure to properly implement this directive will not only distort trade between compliant and non-compliant Member States, but also have serious animal rights implications.
Kdaj bodo na razpolago podatki o napredku vseh držav članic na tem področju?
When will data be available on the progress of all Member States in this area?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da jajca iz reje v neustreznih kletkah, tudi iz tretjih držav, ne bodo dana v promet?
What plans does the Commission have to ensure that eggs from non-compliant cages, including eggs from third countries, are not put on the market?
Kako bo Komisija glede na dolgotrajnost postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev kratkoročno obravnavala države članice, ki ne izpolnjujejo obveznosti?
Given that infringement proceedings are often lengthy, how will the Commission deal with non-compliant Member States in the short-term?
Kakšne bodo po njenem mnenju predvidoma posledice za notranji trg, če se bodo v nekaterih državah članicah od 1. januarja 2012 še vedno uporabljale nezakonite cenejše metode za proizvodnjo jajc?
What implications does it foresee for the internal market if some Member States are still using illegal, cheaper methods to produce eggs as of 1 January 2012?
Kako veliko bo izkrivljanje trgovine?
What will the trade distortions be?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen na tem področju, odkar je komisar Dalli nazadnje nagovoril Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja?
What progress has been made in this area since Commissioner Dalli last addressed the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000306/2011
Question for oral answer O-000306/2011
v imenu Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve Zadeva: Osnutek preglednice dosežkov za nadzor makroekonomskih neravnovesij
on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Subject: Draft scoreboard for the surveillance of macroeconomic imbalances
Kako namerava Komisija uvesti uporabo preglednice dosežkov v okviru sprejete ureditve na področju preprečevanja in zmanjševanja makroekonomskih neravnovesij?
How does the Commission intend to implement the scoreboard as part of the agreed regulation on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances?
Kako bo v okviru letnega poročila o mehanizmu opozarjanja izvajala oceno držav članic, ki imajo velik primanjkljaj ali presežek na tekočem računu?
In particular, how does it intend to implement as part of the annual alert mechanism report the assessment of Member States showing large current-account deficits or surpluses?
Ali ima Komisija tehnično znanje in dovolj človeških virov za aktivno in pregledno izvajanje vseh ukrepov novega okvira makroekonomskega nadzora (na primer poročilo o mehanizmu opozarjanja in ekonomsko branje poročila ter predvsem poglobljeni pregledi in misije)?
Does the Commission have the technical expertise and sufficient human resources to implement all the steps of the new macroeconomic surveillance framework (i.e. alert mechanism report and the economic reading of the report, and in particular the in-depth review and missions) in a vigorous and transparent manner?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bo preglednica dosežkov dovolj hitro zaznala te vrste negativnega razvoja dogodkov, glede na to, da je poročilo o mehanizmu opozarjanja zasnovano kot letno poročilo, makroekonomske razmere v državi članici pa se lahko hitro poslabšajo med letom?
Taking into account that the alert mechanism report is conceived to be an annual report and the macroeconomic situation in a Member State may nevertheless deteriorate rapidly within a year, how will the Commission ensure that the scoreboard can pick up these kinds of deteriorating developments quickly enough?
Ali lahko preglednica dosežkov zazna regionalna neravnovesja, kot so velike regionalne razlike v cenah nepremičnin?
Can the scoreboard pick up regional macroeconomic imbalances, e.g. real estate prices with significant regional differences?
Ali se je Komisija z evropskim odborom za sistemska tveganja dogovorila o mehanizmu operativnega sodelovanja?
Has the Commission agreed on any operational cooperation mechanism with the European Systemic Risk Board?
S katerimi ukrepi bo Komisija za preglednico dosežkov in ekonomsko branje zagotovila pravočasne in najkakovostnejše statistične podatke?
What measures will the Commission take to make sure it has timely statistics of the highest quality for inclusion in the scoreboard and in its economic reading?
Kateri postopki so po mnenju Komisije najprimernejši za pregled preglednice glede na njen velik socialnoekonomski učinek?
Given its wide-ranging socio-economic implications, what procedures does the Commission consider to be most appropriate when reviewing the scoreboard?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000307/2011
Question for oral answer O-000307/2011
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Revizija Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Revision of Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
Evropska unija je leta 2002 v skladu s členom 352 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije v zvezi s subsidiarnostjo in ob upoštevanju duha solidarnosti iz člena 222 PDEU z Uredbo (ES) 2012/2002 uvedla Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije kot instrument za učinkovito nujno finančno pomoč prebivalcem, ki so jih prizadele naravne nesreče.
In 2002 the European Union, with reference to Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) concerning subsidiarity and in compliance with the spirit of solidarity evoked in Article 222 TFEU, established through Regulation (EC) 2012/2002 the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) as an emergency tool to provide populations hit by a natural disaster with effective emergency financial help via a fast-track decision-making process that could ensure a rapid return, in human and economic terms, to normal living conditions in all the regions affected by the disaster.
Gre za instrument pomoči, ki omogoča, da bi s hitrimi postopki odločanja v vseh prizadetih regijah zagotovili čim prejšnjo vzpostavitev normalnih življenjskih pogojev, tako v človeškem kot finančnem smislu.
Currently, northern Italy is being devastated by natural disasters that are hitting regions such as Liguria, Piedmont and Lombardy hard in human and economic terms.
Pred letom dni so Benečijo prizadele poplave, vendar kljub temu, kar je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 1, 2 in 8 ter v členu 1 Uredbe o ustanovitvi solidarnostnega sklada, ta regija doslej zaradi birokracije, povezane s zbiranjem podatkov, od Evropske unije ni prejela še nobene finančne pomoči.
Venice was hit by flooding one year ago but, despite what is stated in Recitals 1, 2 and 8 and Article 1 of the EUSF Regulation, to date has still not received any financial aid from the European Union due to the bureaucracy surrounding data collection.
Ali namerava Komisija pregledati mehanizme za dostop do sredstev sklada in za njegovo uporabo, saj je obravnavanje prošenj prizadetega prebivalstva še vedno počasno in neučinkovito?
In view of these facts, does the Commission have any plans to revise the mechanism for accessing and activating the Fund, which is still ineffective and slow to respond to the needs of the populations affected?
Ali namerava Komisija odpraviti razlikovanje med velikimi in izrednimi nesrečami, saj to diskriminira žrtve in jih v stiski še dodatno kaznuje?
Has the Commission considered removing the distinction between major disasters and extraordinary disasters which is, in fact, discriminatory and penalises victims at a time of adversity?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je treba uvesti sistem predplačil za povrnitev škode, ki so jo utrpele prizadete države/regije, s katerim bi lahko dejansko zagotovili hitro pomoč v nujnih primerih?
Does the Commission agree that an advance payment system needs to be introduced for compensation for damage suffered by the countries/regions hit, as this could really provide rapid emergency relief?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000308/2011
Question for oral answer O-000308/2011
v imenu Odbora za ribištvo Zadeva: Trenutno stanje v zvezi s predlaganim dolgoročnim načrtom za zahodni stalež šura in ribištvo, ki izkorišča ta stalež
on behalf of the Committee on Fisheries Subject: State of play regarding the proposed multiannual plan for the western stock of Atlantic horse mackerel and the fisheries exploiting that stock
Parlament je 23. novembra 2010 sprejel zakonodajno resolucijo o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi dolgoročnega načrta za zahodni stalež šura in ribištvo, ki izkorišča ta stalež (KOM(2009)0189).
Parliament adopted a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual plan for the western stock of Atlantic horse mackerel and the fisheries exploiting that stock (COM(2009)0189), on 23 November 2010.
Cilj načrta je ohraniti biomaso zahodnega šura na ravni, ki zagotavlja trajnostno izkoriščanje, in zagotoviti največji dolgoročni donos.
The plan’s objective is to maintain the biomass of western horse mackerel at a level that ensures its sustainable exploitation, and to provide the highest long-term yield.