natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali Komisija lahko navede ukrepe, ki jih je sprejela za znižanje stroškov registracije patentov v EU?
Can the Commission outline what measures it is pursuing to simplify the costs of registering a patent in the EU?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000120/2011
Question for Question Time H-000120/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Strategija Evropske unije za brezdomstvo
(ALDE) Subject: EU strategy on homelessness
Ali Svet lahko navede, katere pobude je sprejela Evropska unija za pomoč brezdomcem in za podporo nacionalnim strategijam v boju proti brezdomstvu?
Can the Council outline what initiatives the EU is undertaking to help homeless people and to support national strategies in the fight against homelessness?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000121/2011
Question for Question Time H-000121/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Sodelovanje med EU in ZDA na področju raziskav in razvoja
(ALDE) Subject: R&D cooperation between the EU and the USA
Ali Komisija lahko pripravi izčrpno izjavo o ravni sodelovanja med EU in Združenimi državami Amerike na področju raziskav, inovacij, znanosti in tehnologije?
Can the Commission make a comprehensive statement on the level of cooperation between the EU and the United States of America in the field of research, innovation, science and technology?
Katere pobude je od februarja 2010 sprejela Komisija, da bi razširila sodelovanje na tem področju?
What initiatives has the Commission pursued to extend cooperation in this field since February 2010?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000122/2011
Question for Question Time H-000122/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Ravnanje z odpadki v Grčiji
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Waste management in Greece
Komisija je v svojem odgovoru na vprašanje E-3732/2010 navedla, da so odlagališča skrajna in najbolj neustrezna rešitev za ravnanje z odpadki.
In its answer of 9 August 2010 to Written Question E-3732/2010 the Commission said that it 'considers landfill disposal to be the least and last desirable manner for managing and treating waste'.
V Grčiji je načrtovana gradnja 61 odlagališč, ki bodo deležna sofinanciranja.
In Greece there are plans to construct 61 landfill sites with cofinancing arrangements.
To je izzvalo upravičen odziv prebivalcev več regij (v mestih Lefkimi, Gramatiko in zlasti Keratea), ki so prisiljeni sprejeti to „skrajno in najbolj neustrezno“ rešitev.
These plans have naturally met with opposition from local residents in many areas (Lefkimi, Grammatiko and especially Keratea), who are forced to accept this ' least and last desirable' solution.
Vztrajanje vlade pri uvedbi te tehnologije ter metod zbiranja odpadkov in ravnanja z odpadki, ki jih je sprejela, je po mnenju medijev, okoljevarstvenih organizacij, političnih strank in lokalnih organov povezano z določenimi industrijskimi interesi, pri čemer nekateri v tem vidijo nov politični in gospodarski škandal.
According to the press, environmental organisations, political parties and local authorities, the government's persistence in seeking to impose this technology and methods for collecting and managing waste are connected with certain corporate interests, something that could result in a fresh political and economic scandal.
Ali lahko Komisija odgovori na naslednji vprašanji: Ali ne glede na to, kako to vprašanje rešujejo posamezne države, meni, da je z ekološkega in okoljskega vidika boljša možnost, ki jo predlagajo okoljevarstvene organizacije (WWF, Greenpeace, S.O.S. Sredozemlje itd.), namreč ločevanje odpadkov v gospodinjstvih namesto njihovega recikliranja prek podjetij?
Can the Commission answer the following questions: Independently of the choices made by each country, does it consider it preferable from an ecological and environmental point of view to use the option proposed by environmental organisations (WWF, Greenpeace, SOS Mediterranean, etc.) that waste should be sorted by households at source rather than recycled at waste plants?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000123/2011
Question for Question Time H-000123/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Nogometno prvenstvo Evropske unije
(PPE) Subject: European Union Football Championship
Turnir Evropske unije na izpadanje v dveh tekmah, ki bi potekal en mesec v poletnem obdobju in bi se ga udeležilo 30 moštev (moštva 26 držav Evropske unije ter Severne Irske, Walesa, Škotske in Anglije), bi precej povečal prepoznavnost Evropske unije.
A European Union 30-team knockout tournament over two legs, run in one month of summer with 26 European Union countries plus Northern Ireland, Wales, Scotland and England would significantly boost exposure of the European Union.
Turnir bi izboljšal tudi seznanjenost navadnih državljanov s tem, kdo so njihovi sosedje v EU, in bi tako prispeval k razlikovanju med EU in Evropo kot celino.
It would also enhance the knowledge of ordinary citizens as to who their EU neighbours are and with that, distinguish the EU from Europe as a continent.
Ali bi lahko Svet preučil možnost za promocijo nogometnega prvenstva Evropske unije, ki bi potekalo vsaka štiri leta izven letnih terminov svetovnega in evropskega nogometnega prvenstva?
Would the Council explore the possibility of promoting a European Union football championship, once every four years, outside of a World Cup or European Championship year?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000124/2011
Question for Question Time H-000124/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Sodelovanje za izboljšanje raziskav in razvoja
(PPE) Subject: Cooperation to improve Research and Development (R&D)
Komisija je pred nedavnim sprejela Unijo inovacij, strateški pristop k inovacijam, ki je usmerjen predvsem v spreminjanje idej v delovna mesta, okolju prijazno rast in socialni napredek.
The Commission recently adopted the Innovation Union, a strategic approach to innovation aimed primarily at turning ideas into jobs, green growth and social progress.
Če naj EU pri raziskavah in razvoju dohiti ZDA, bo morala okrepiti sodelovanje med državami članicami, izboljšati pobude za skupne raziskave ter omogočiti razširitev raziskav in razvoja v nekaterih regijah za splošno korist.
If the EU is to catch the US in R&D, it will have to enhance cooperation between Member States, improve joint research initiatives and allow for the expansion of R&D in certain regions for the benefit of all.
Glede na podnebje, bi lahko bila na primer Irska najboljši kraj za pospeševanje testiranja in izboljšanje energije vetra, medtem ko bi Španija lahko imela ključno vlogo pri izboljšavah razvoja sončnih kolektorjev.
Given their climates, for example, Ireland could be the best place to advance testing and improve wind energy, whilst Spain may hold the key to improvements on solar panel development.
Ali Komisija to načrtuje ter namenja pozornost raziskavam in razvoju kot celoti namesto izravnavanju financiranja EU za to področje v vseh regijah?
Does the Commission plan to do just that, putting the emphasis on overall R&D, rather than a levelling of EU financing for R&D across regions?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000125/2011
Question for Question Time H-000125/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Status beguncev v Turčiji
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Status of refugees in Turkey
Turčija je podpisnica Ženevske konvencije o beguncih iz leta 1951 in njenega protokola.
Turkey is a contracting party to the 1951 Geneva Convention on refugees and its supplementary protocol.
Vendar je izrazila pridržke, ki zadevajo geografske omejitve.
It has nevertheless set conditions that impose a geographical limitation.
Konkretneje se je odločila, da bo preučila le tiste prošnje za azil, ki so povezane z dogodki v Evropi.
Thus Turkey has imposed the restriction that it will only consider asylum applications based on facts that have taken place in Europe.
To pomeni, da turška država kot spremenljive ne obravnava nobene prošnje za azil, ki jo vložijo državljani neevropskih držav.
This means that asylum applications by non-European citizens will not be considered admissible by the Turkish state under any circumstances.
Gre za kršitev pravic beguncev, kot jih opredeljuje Ženevska konvencija, kar je neskladno z Listino EU o temeljnih pravicah (člena 18 in 19) in načelom enake obravnave.
This is a violation of the rights of refugees as defined in the Geneva Convention and is incompatible with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Articles 18 and 19) and the principle of equal treatment.
Ali je Evropska unija, z dejanji ali njihovo opustitvijo, priznala paradoksalni značaj teh pridržkov k Ženevski konvenciji, ki kršijo načela humanizma in enake obravnave?
Has the European Union, by action or omission, accepted the peculiar nature of the above conditions placed on the Geneva Convention, in violation of the principles of humane and equal treatment?
Ali je od Turčije zahtevala, naj te pridržke umakne?
Has it called on Turkey to lift these conditions?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000126/2011
Question for Question Time H-000126/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Ulični protesti v severnoafriških državah
(PPE) Subject: Street protests in North African countries
Ali Svet meni, da bi morala EU bolj dejavno ustvarjati odnose z nekaterimi severnoafriškimi državami, v katerih so se razplamteli ulični protesti, ter jih usmerjati k demokratični poti?
Given the level of street protest in certain North African countries, does the Council believe that the EU should take a more active role in building relations with these countries by encouraging such countries to follow the democratic path?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000127/2011
Question for Question Time H-000127/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Predlagana prepoved rezanja plavuti morskim psom
(PPE) Subject: Proposed ban on shark finning
Poslanci Evropskega parlamenta so pred nedavnim podprli prepoved rezanja plavuti morskim psom; kongres Združenih držav Amerike je uvedel zakonodajo, v skladu s katero je ta praksa prepovedana, druge jurisdikcije pa odločno menijo, da bi bilo treba takšno zakonodajo izvajati – kakšni so glede na vse to predlogi Komisije, s katerimi bi pomisleke poslancev Evropskega parlamenta prevedli v zakonodajo?
In light of the recent support by the Members of the European Parliament for the banning of shark finning, and given the fact that Congress in the United States has introduced legislation banning the practice and that other jurisdictions feel very strongly that such legislation should be implemented, what does the Commission propose in terms of giving legislative effect to the concerns of MEPs?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000128/2011
Question for Question Time H-000128/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Ukrepanje Komisije v zvezi s kršenjem zaščitenih območij v omrežju Natura 2000 v Bolgariji
(S&D) Subject: EU action in response to violations of protected Natura 2000 areas in Bulgaria
Ali lahko Komisija v zvezi z mojim vprašanjem E-5671/2010 o kršenju zakonodaje Unije na rtu Kaliakra in drugih zaščitenih območjih v omrežju Natura 2000 v Bolgariji ter svojim odgovorom z dne 30. septembra 2010 pojasni, kakšne ukrepe je sprejela ali jih namerava sprejeti glede teh kršitev?
With reference to my written question E-5671/2010 on violations of EU legislation on the Kaliakra Peninsular and in other Natura 2000 protected areas in Bulgaria, and the Commission’s answer of 30 September 2010, can the Commission state what steps it has taken or is contemplating taking in response to these violations?
Komisija je imela na voljo več kot osem mesecev, da oceni, kako se je bolgarska vlada odzvala na dodatni uradni opomin, ki je bil poslan bolgarskim organom 18. marca 2010.
More specifically, the Commission has had more than eight months to assess the Bulgarian Government’s reaction to the complementary letter of formal notice sent to the Bulgarian authorities on 18 March 2010.
Kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti, da bi bile nepravilnosti, navedene v tem opominu, odpravljene?
What action will the Commission take to ensure that the irregularities referred to in that letter are rectified?
Kdaj načrtuje naslednji korak, ko bo Bolgariji poslala obrazloženo mnenje?
When does the Commission intend to move to the next stage and send a ‘reasoned opinion’ to Bulgaria?
Če je bila zakonodaja Unije resnično hudo kršena, zakaj se Komisija ne more odločiti, da bi za odpravo tega stanja sprožila postopek iz člena 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije?
Should serious violations of EU legislation have indeed been committed, why is the Commission hesitating over launching the procedure under Article 258 TFEU and curbing these violations?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000129/2011
Question for Question Time H-000129/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Raziskave o virusu HIV/aidsu in malariji
(PPE) Subject: Research on HIV/AIDS and malaria
Podsaharska Afrika je nesorazmerno hudo prizadeta zaradi virusa HIV/aidsa in malarije.
The diseases of HIV/AIDS and malaria disproportionately affect Sub-Saharan Africa.
Raziskave za blažitev in, kjer je to mogoče, izkoreninjenje teh grozljivih bolezni je treba spodbujati in obravnavati kot prednostno nalogo, in sicer tako na evropski kot na svetovni ravni, saj bi s tem neizmerno pomagali skupnostim po vsej podsaharski Afriki, ki jih te epidemije uničujejo.
Research to mitigate and where possible to eradicate these terrible diseases is to be encouraged and prioritised on both a European and global level and would be of enormous aid to communities across Sub-Saharan Africa which are blighted by these epidemics.
S katerimi ukrepi se namerava Komisija soočiti s temi izjemnimi izzivi v smislu financiranja raziskav?
What steps is the Commission taking to tackle these enormous challenges in terms of research funding?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000130/2011
Question for Question Time H-000130/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Industrijska uporaba in recikliranje rdečega blata v Evropi
(S&D) Subject: Industrial utilisation and recycling of red mud in Europe
Katastrofa z rdečim blatom na Madžarskem je povečala ozaveščenost o delujočih tehnologijah industrijske uporabe in recikliranja rdečega blata, na kar je opozorilo več evropskih in mednarodnih strokovnjakov.
The red mud disaster in Hungary raised awareness of functioning technologies for the industrial utilisation and recycling of red mud, as highlighted by several European and international experts.
Glede na znanstvene izračune je mogoče iz rdečega blata pridobiti znatne količine železa, titana in drugih redkih kovin, ta material pa je mogoče uporabiti tudi v gradbeni industriji, natančneje pri proizvodnji cementa.
According to scientific calculations, a considerable amount of iron, titanium and other rare metals can be extracted from red mud, but the material can also be applied in the construction industry, namely in cement production.
Tovrstne teste so izvedli že na Japonskem in v Indiji.
Such tests have been conducted in Japan and in India.
Glede na lastne izračune je na ozemlju EU v različnih oblikah okrog 220 milijonov ton rdečega blata.
It is calculated that approximately 220 million tons of red mud is stored within the territory of the EU in various forms.
Te rešitve so na dosegu roke, vendar so za njihovo izpopolnitev potrebne raziskave, za njihovo izvajanje pa precejšnje naložbe.
Nonetheless, further research is needed in order to perfect them, and their application will require considerable investment.
Ali Komisija meni, da je financiranje raziskav takšnih tehnologij v interesu evropskih državljanov?
Does the Commission think that financing research into such technologies is in the interest of European citizens?
Kolikšna evropska finančna sredstva bi lahko uporabili v ta namen?
What possible European financial resources can be applied for this purpose?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000131/2011
Question for Question Time H-000131/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Pomoč otrokom z motnjami pri učenju
(S&D) Subject: Supporting children with learning difficulties
Po statističnih poročilih ima precejšnje število otrok motnje pri učenju (npr. disleksijo, diskalkulijo ali disgrafijo), pa tudi vedenjske težave in težave pri vključevanju.
According to statistical reports, a substantial number of children have learning difficulties (such as dyslexia, dyscalculia or dysgraphia), as well as behavioural problems, and difficulties in fitting in.
Ti otroci so brez posebne pomoči močno prikrajšani ob zaključku osnovnega izobraževanja, kar jim zelo otežuje prehod v sekundarno ali terciarno izobraževanje.
Without special assistance, these children face serious disadvantage by the end of their primary education, which makes it very difficult for them to move on to secondary and tertiary education.
Motnje pri učenju dolgoročno okrnijo možnosti zaposlitve, to pa vodi v revščino in socialno izključenost, pa tudi v slabitev evropske konkurenčnosti.
In the long run, learning difficulties worsen employment opportunities and, therefore, result in poverty and social exclusion, as well as in a decline in Europe’s competitiveness.
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti, da bi otrokom z motnjami pri učenju zagotovila vso potrebno pomoč na vseh stopnjah izobraževanja skozi celotno obdobje izobraževanja?
What does the Commission plan to do in order to ensure that children with learning difficulties get all the necessary support at all educational levels throughout their learning life?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000132/2011
Question for Question Time H-000132/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Partnerstvo za inovacije o dejavnem in zdravem staranju
(PPE) Subject: Innovation partnership on active and healthy ageing
Evropa se mora pripraviti na hitro staranje družbe.
Europe needs to prepare for a rapidly ageing society.
Inovacije so pomemben pomožni instrument, ki ga imamo pri tem na voljo.
Innovation is an important instrument which we have available to assist us in this.
Tesno sodelovanje med odgovornimi za različna področja politike, vključno z digitalno politiko, javnozdravstveno politiko, politiko raziskav in industrijsko politiko, je nujno, da bi našli odgovor na demografske spremembe in užili koristi staranja.
Close cooperation between those responsible for different fields of policy, including digital policy, public health policy, research policy and industrial policy, is necessary in order to have an answer to demographic change and to reap the benefits of ageing.
Zato je dobro, da je Komisija konec leta 2010 dala pobudo za partnerstvo o dejavnem in zdravem staranju.
It is therefore a good thing that the Commission launched the partnership on ‘active and healthy ageing’ at the end of 2010.
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kako nadalje ukrepati, potem ko je bilo opravljeno posvetovanje in postavljen usmerjevalni odbor?
Can the Commission indicate what further steps are to be taken now that a consultation has been held and a steering board set up?
Kakšno vlogo predvideva za partnerstvo za inovacije v evropskem letu aktivnega staranja in medgeneracijske solidarnosti?
What role does it see for the innovation partnership in the European Year of Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations?
Kdaj bo Komisija začela drugo partnerstvo za inovacije in kako bo takrat uporabila začetne izkušnje in rezultate sedanjega partnerstva za inovacije?
When will the Commission launch a second innovation partnership, and in so doing, how will it use the initial experiences and results of the current innovation partnership?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000133/2011
Question for Question Time H-000133/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Osrednje omrežje vseevropskega prometnega omrežja (TEN-T)
(S&D) Subject: The core network of the new TEN-T
Postopek pregleda politike TEN-T je v zaključni fazi.
The review process of the TEN-T policy has now entered into its final phase.
Komisija naj bi po pričakovanjih do sredine leta 2011 podala predlog za nove smernice zanj.
The submission of a Commission proposal for new TEN-T Guidelines is expected by mid-2011.
V svojem delovnem dokumentu o novem TEN-T, objavljenem januarja 2011, je določila možno metodologijo načrtovanja za novi TEN-T.
In its Staff Working Document on the new TEN-T, published in January 2011, the Commission sets out a possible planning methodology for the new TEN-T.
Prihodnji TEN-T naj bi vseboval dvoplastno strukturo omrežja, in sicer celotno omrežje in osrednje omrežje.
The future TEN-T is planned to feature a dual layer network structure, comprising a comprehensive network and a core network.
Ali Svet podpira predlagano metodologijo načrtovanja in ali meni, da je to dobra podlaga za določitev osrednjega omrežja novega TEN-T?
Does the Council support the suggested planning methodology and consider it a good basis for determining the core network of the new TEN-T?
Kako bi bilo treba po mnenju Sveta izboljšati to metodologijo načrtovanja?
What improvements does the Council consider the planning methodology needs?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000134/2011
Question for Question Time H-000134/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Cilji direktiv o pticah in habitatih
(ALDE) Subject: Objectives of the Birds and Habitats Directives
Evropi ni uspelo doseči ciljev zadnje strategije o biotski raznovrstnosti.
Europe failed to achieve the objectives of the last biodiversity strategy.
Vendar se v nekaterih državah članicah, tudi na Nizozemskem, slišijo govorice o slabitvi ciljev direktiv o pticah in habitatih.
Nonetheless, noises are being made in a number of Member States, including the Netherlands, about watering down the objectives of the Birds and Habitats Directives.
Ali si namerava Komisija v celoti prizadevati za cilje evropske naravovarstvene zakonodaje?
Does the Commission intend to fully pursue the objectives of European nature legislation?
Če to namerava, katere ukrepe bo sprejela, da bodo države članice uveljavile izvajanje evropske zakonodaje?
If so, what measures will the Commission be taking to enforce implementation of European nature legislation by the Member States?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000135/2011
Question for Question Time H-000135/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Uporaba indeksa okoljske uspešnosti pri izvajanju okoljske politike Evropske unije
(S&D) Subject: Use of the EPI in implementation of the European Union's environmental policy
Po indeksu za okoljske uspešnosti, ki so ga razvili raziskovalci univerze Yale in ki meri, v kolikšni meri nacionalne vlade izvajajo zastavljene cilje na področju okoljske politike, so se v letu 2010 samo 3 države članice EU znašle med desetimi najbolje ocenjenimi državami (od skupno 163).
In the 2010 environmental performance index (EPI) produced by researchers at Yale University, which benchmarks implementation of environmental policy against national governments’ goals, only three EU Member States figure among the top 10 (out of a total of 163) best performing countries.
Najslabše uvrščene države članice Evropske unije glede na okoljsko uspešnost so Grčija, Belgija in Ciper.
The EU countries ranked lowest for their environmental performance are Greece, Belgium and Cyprus.
Tudi Bolgarija, Poljska, Estonija in Slovenija niso v veliko boljšem položaju.
Bulgaria, Poland, Estonia and Slovenia did not do much better.
Ali Komisija pri sprejemanju sklepov na področju okolja upošteva znanstvene ocene?
When taking decisions on environmental matters, does the Commission take into account assessments by scientists?
Če je tako, katere ukrepe je sprejela, da bi države članice, ki s težavo izvajajo zastavljene cilje na področju okolja, dobile strokovno in materialno pomoč?
If so, what steps have been taken to provide Member States that are finding it difficult to achieve their environment goals with expert assistance and material support?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000136/2011
Question for Question Time H-000136/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Razlike v zdravstvenih storitvah med državami članicami
(S&D) Subject: Discrepancies in healthcare in the Member States
Med regijami in državami članicami Evropske unije še vedno obstajajo velike razlike v zdravstvenih storitvah ter neenakosti pri obravnavi pacientov kar zadeva kakovost zdravstvenih storitev in povračila za zdravila za težke bolezni, kot je Alzheimerjeva bolezen.
There are still major discrepancies in the regions and Member States of the EU in healthcare services and unequal treatment of patients in terms of access to high-quality services and reimbursement of medication for complex illnesses such as Alzheimer’s.
Ali Komisija namerava ukrepati v zvezi s tem?
Does the Commission intend to take any action in this regard?