natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Migrante in prosilce za azil še vedno pridržujejo, in sicer v zelo slabih razmerah, za mladoletnike brez spremstva pa skoraj ni podpore.
Migrants and asylum seekers continue to be detained, and in very bad conditions, and there is little or no assistance to unaccompanied minors.
Nič ne kaže, da bi se razmere kaj kmalu izboljšale.
This situation is not likely to improve soon.
Na tej stopnji bi bila potrebna razprava o dublinskem sistemu in sistemu resnične solidarnosti znotraj EU.
A debate on a possible reform of the Dublin system and real intra-EU solidarity system would be necessary at this stage.
Čeprav je Komisija Atenam namenila sredstva, gradnja primernih zbirnih centrov za migrante še zdaleč ni izpolnila pričakovanj.
While the Commission has made funding available for Athens, the construction of adequate reception centres for migrants, for example, is far behind expectations.
Zdi se, da imajo grški organi težave pri črpanju evropskih sredstev, namenjenih izboljšanju njihovega azilnega sistema.
The Greek authorities seem to have problems in absorbing the European funds earmarked for improving their asylum system.
Kako namerava Svet spodbuditi grške organe k temu, da bi črpali sredstva, ki so jim bila namenjena, izboljšali sprejemne zmogljivosti in zagotovili višji standard za ljudi, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito?
What does the Council intend to do to encourage the Greek authorities to use the resources that have been made available to them, improve their reception capacities and ensure higher standards for people in need of international protection?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000008/2012
Question for oral answer O-000008/2012
Grški organi so začeli konec leta 2010 izvajati temeljito reformo svoje azilne in migracijske politike ter sprejeli nacionalni načrt za njeno upravljanje.
At the end of 2010 the Greek authorities undertook to implement a thorough reform of their asylum and migration policies and adopted a National Plan on Asylum and Migration Management.
Iz prvega četrtletnega poročila delovne skupine Komisije za Grčijo (z dne 17. novembra) je razvidno, da so dosegli nekaj napredka, med drugim je bila ustanovljena enota za podporo pri prošnjah za azil, povečalo se je število ugoditev prošnjam za azil ter ustanovil organ, pristojen za nadzor nad migranti ob njihovem prihodu.
According to the first quarterly report from the Commission Task Force for Greece (17 November), some progress has been achieved, including the creation of a support unit for asylum requests, an increased number of favourable answers to asylum requests, and the setting up of an authority responsible for the oversight of migrants when they arrive.
Nič ne kaže, da bi se razmere kmalu izboljšale.
This situation is not likely to improve soon.
Na tej stopnji bi bila potrebna razprava o morebitni reformi dublinskega sistema in sistema resnične solidarnosti znotraj EU.
A debate on a possible reform of the Dublin system and real intra-EU solidarity system would be necessary at this stage.
Kako namerava Komisija poskrbeti za to, da bodo grški organi črpali sredstva, ki so jim bila namenjena, za izboljšanje sprejemnih zmogljivosti in zagotovitev višjega standarda za ljudi, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito?
What does the Commission intend to do to ensure that the Greek authorities use the resources that have been made available to them in order to improve reception capacities and ensure higher standards for people in need of international protection?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000009/2012
Question for oral answer O-000009/2012
Zadeva: Madžarski posebni krizni davek v maloprodajnem sektorju
Subject: Hungarian special crisis tax on the retail sector
Madžarska vlada je 18. oktobra 2010 sprejela poseben krizni davek za maloprodajni sektor, ki ima že zaradi svoje strukture škodljive posledice za tuja podjetja in bi utegnil ogroziti pravico do ustanavljanja, lahko pa bi ga šteli celo za nezakonito državno pomoč.
On 18 October 2010, the Hungarian Government adopted a special crisis tax on the retail sector which, through its structure, adversely affects foreign companies and could represent a threat to freedom of establishment as well as illegal state aid.
Kakor je ta davek strukturiran zdaj, gre dejansko za znatno finančno breme za tuje trgovce na drobno, ne bremeni pa njihovih madžarskih konkurentov, ki poslujejo kot franšizne mreže, ne združujejo pa prometa v vsej mreži.
As structured, the tax imposes de facto a significant financial burden on foreign retailers which is not imposed on their Hungarian competitors operating as franchise networks, without aggregating their turnover across the network.
Na ta način najvišji davek velja samo za tuja podjetja, s tem pa je kršena zakonodaja EU in se diskriminirajo različni poslovni modeli.
Therefore, the highest tax rate only applies to foreign companies and is thus in breach of EU law, discriminating between different business models.
Selektivna narava tega davka je veliko močneje vplivala na velika tuja podjetja, s tem pa je prišlo do neenakih konkurenčnih pogojev za tuja in domača podjetja in bi utegnilo pomeniti tudi kršenje pravil o državni pomoči.
The selective nature of this tax has had a significantly higher impact on large foreign companies, creating an unlevel playing field between foreign and domestic companies, and could possibly be considered as contrary to state aid rules.
Več kot leto dni po uvedbi tega posebnega davka so razmere za trgovce na drobno na Madžarskem še vedno enake, saj plačujejo visoke stroške tega diskriminatornega davka.
More than one year after the introduction of the special crisis tax, the situation is still the same for foreign retailers in Hungary, which are paying a great deal for what is a discriminatory tax.
Glede na povedano bi morala Komisija kot varuhinja temeljnih pogodb končati te protekcionistične ukrepe, saj je v tem času spoštovanje pravil notranjega trga pomembnejše kot kdajkoli prej; k temu je pozval tudi Parlament v svoji resoluciji o bolj učinkovitem in poštenem maloprodajnem trgu z dne 5. julija 2011 ( P7_TA(2011)0307 ).
Given the above, the Commission, as guardian of the treaties, should put an end to such protectionist measures at a time when compliance with internal-market rules is more crucial than ever, as called for by Parliament in its resolution of 5 July 2011 on a more efficient and fairer retail market ( P7_TA(2011)0307 ).
Ali Komisija meni, da gre pri tem davku za kršitev prva EU in za diskriminacijo med različnimi poslovnimi modeli, in če da, kako je ukrepala proti temu?
Does the Commission consider that this tax breaches EU law and discriminates between different business models and, if so, what action has the Commission taken to combat this?
Ali je Komisija pridobila dodatne informacije od madžarskih oblasti, ki so potrebne za oceno skladnosti tega posebnega davka z zakonodajo EU?
Has the Commission received any additional information from the Hungarian authorities required to assess the compatibility of the special retail tax with EU law?
Ali bo Komisija podrobneje preučila ta davek glede na določbe o državni pomoči, da bo uredila sedanje znatno konkurenčno neravnovesje?
Will the Commission look further into the tax - under state aid provisions - to redress the current considerable competitive imbalance?
Kateri bodo naslednji ukrepi Komisije?
What are the next steps that the Commission intends to take?
Ali lahko posreduje natančen časovni razpored teh preiskav?
Can the Commission also provide a precise timeframe for these investigations?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000010/2012
Question for oral answer O-000010/2012
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Položaj migrantov in prosilcev za azil v Grčiji
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: The situation of migrants and asylum seekers in Greece
Sodišče Evropske unije in Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice sta Grčijo v številnih zadevah obsodili zaradi kršenja temeljnih pravic v povezavi s tem, kako ravna s prosilci za azil.
The European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights have found Greece in breach of fundamental rights regarding its treatment of asylum seekers in numerous cases.
Septembra 2010 je Grčija predložila Komisiji svoj nacionalni načrt za upravljanje z azilom in migracijami, v skladu s katerim bi morala EU za naslednja tri leta zagotoviti Grčiji finančne prispevke (redne in izredne) za infrastrukturo, storitve, strokovno znanje in usposabljanje, nadzor in ocenjevanje kakovosti sistema za upravljanje toka priseljevanja, pa tudi zagotoviti nujna sredstva za izvajanje prehodne faze azilnega postopka ter za centre prvega pregleda in sprejema.
In September 2010 Greece submitted to the Commission its National Plan on Asylum and Migration Management, according to which the EU is requested to provide Greece, for the next three years, with financial contributions (regular and emergency) for infrastructure and services, know-how and training, supervision and quality assessment of the immigration flow system, besides the provision of emergency funding for the implementation of the transition phase of the asylum process and the first screening and reception centres.
Leto in pol pozneje ostaja položaj prosilcev za azil in migrantov, ki vstopajo v Evropo preko regije Evros, zelo zaskrbljujoč, saj prihaja do smrtnih žrtev in nespoštovanja temeljih pravic oseb, otroci pa so še vedno zaprti v grozljivih pogojih.
A year and a half later, the humanitarian situation remains very worrying for asylum seekers and migrants entering Europe through the Evros region, with lives being lost, basic rights being denied and children still being detained in appalling conditions.
Istočasno je Grčija ukrepala zelo hitro in na meji s Turčijo razporedila vojsko ter ob tej meji začela graditi ograjo in jarek, medtem ko na primer gradnja sprejemnih centrov zelo zaostaja za načrti.
At the same time, Greece has moved quickly to militarise the Greek-Turkish border and start constructing a fence and a ditch along the border, while the construction of reception centres for migrants, for example, is far behind schedule.
Zdi se, da imajo Grški organi težave pri črpanju sredstev, namenjenih izboljšanju njihovega azilnega sistema.
The Greek authorities seem to have problems absorbing the funds earmarked for improving their asylum system.
Koliko sredstev države članice namenjajo Grčiji za upravljanje z azilom in migracijami?
How much funding do Member States provide to Greece for asylum and migration management?
Iz katerih skladov se zagotavljajo ta sredstva in za katere ukrepe?
From which funds is this provided, and for which measures?
Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti, da bodo grški organi razpoložljiva sredstva uporabili za izboljšanje sprejemnih zmogljivosti in zagotavljanje višjega standarda za ljudi, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito?
What does the Council intend to do in order to ensure that the Greek authorities use the resources available to improve reception capacities and ensure higher standards for people in need of international protection?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000011/2012
Question for oral answer O-000011/2012
Katere so glavne ovire pri izvajanju nacionalnega načrta?
What are the main obstacles to implementing the National Plan?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da bodo grški organi razpoložljiva sredstva uporabili za izboljšanje sprejemnih zmogljivosti in zagotavljanje višjega standarda za ljudi, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito?
What does the Commission intend to do in order to ensure that the Greek authorities use the resources available to improve reception capacities and ensure higher standards to people in need of international protection?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000012/2012
Question for oral answer O-000012/2012
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Tretji energetski sveženj
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Third Energy Package
Tretji sveženj za liberalizacijo na področju energetike zagotavlja podlago za konkurenčen energetski trg v Evropski uniji.
The Third Energy Liberalisation Package is a basis for a competitive energy market in the EU.
Toda v zadnjem času predstavniki Ruske federacije in ruski monopolist Gazprom ponovno pozivajo k reformi načel tega svežnja, zlasti k razveljavitvi načela dostopa tretje stranke do infrastrukture za prenos plina.
Recently however, the representatives of the Russian Federation and the Russian monopolist Gazprom have been repeating an appeal to reform the principles of the third package, particularly to repeal the ‘third-party access’ (TPA) principle to the gas transmission infrastructure.
Žal je bilo tako mnenje v nekaterih prestolnicah držav članic EU sprejeto z razumevanjem.
These opinions have unfortunately been sympathetically received in some EU Member State capitals.
Natančneje gledano gre za odpravo načela dostopa tretje stranke do plinovoda Južni tok.
Specifically, this involves the withdrawal of the principle of third-party access to the South Stream pipeline.
V zvezi s kampanjo Ruske federacije proti določbam tretjega liberalizacijskega svežnja obstajajo namigi o predlogu sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Rusko federacijo, na podlagi katerega naj pravila omenjenega svežnja za ruske plinovode za izvoz ne bi bila zavezujoča.
With reference to the Russian Federation’s campaign against the provisions of the third liberalisation package, there have been reports of an agreement being proposed between the European Union and the Russian Federation, under which the aforementioned package’s rules would not be binding with regard to Russian gas export pipelines.
Posvetovanja o tej temi so bila zabeležena v protokolu o gospodarskih pogajanjih med Francijo in Rusijo iz novembra 2011.
The consultations regarding this topic were noted in the protocol of the economic negotiations between France and Russia dated November 2011.
Ali drži, da je bil Komisiji med pogovori EU in Rusije o energiji predstavljen osnutek sporazuma?
Is it true that the Commission was presented with a draft agreement during EU-Russia energy talks?
Ali namerava Komisija ugoditi zahtevam, da je treba Južni tok izvzeti iz pravil tretjega energetskega svežnja, vključno z načelom dostopa tretje stranke?
Is the Commission intending to accede to the demands to exclude South Stream from the rules of the third energy package, including the TPA principle?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000013/2012
Question for oral answer O-000013/2012
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Šesti svetovni forum o vodi v Marseillu, 12.-17. marec 2012
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: 6th World Water Forum in Marseille, 12-17 March 2012
Šesti svetovni forum o vodi, ki bo potekal od 12. do 17. marca 2012 v Marseillu, je edinstvena platforma, kjer se lahko srečajo in razpravljajo predstavniki vodne skupnosti in vodne politike ter nosilci odločanja iz vseh delov sveta, ter poskušajo najti rešitve v zvezi z vodo.
The 6th World Water Forum, a unique platform where the water community and policy and decision makers from all regions of the world can come together, debate and attempt to find solutions for water, will take place in Marseille from 12 to 17 March 2012.
- Kakšna je bila vloga Komisije v političnem procesu, ki je pripeljal do šestega svetovnega foruma o vodi?
- What has been the Commission’s role in the political process leading to the 6th World Water Forum?
- S kakšnim pristopom skuša Evropska unija spodbujati rešitve za vodo, da bi dosegli nadaljnji napredek na globalni, nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, tudi zaradi boja proti revščini in podnebnim spremembam?
- What is the EU’s approach with a view to further progress at the global, national, regional and local levels in promoting solutions for water, also in order to fight poverty and climate change?
Ali bo Komisija podprla tako imenovani pristop upravljanja na več ravneh, ko gre za vprašanja v zvezi z vodo, ter poudarila vlogo regionalnih in lokalnih razsežnosti?
Will the Commission support a ‘multi-level governance’ approach to water issues, stressing the role of the regional and local dimensions?
- Glede na napovedani načrt Komisije za varovanje evropskih vodnih virov in poročilo o izvajanju zakonodaje o vodah v EU, o katerem poteka razprava v Parlamentu, kateri so glavni konkretni ukrepi, ki jih je Komisija predlagala za reševanje izzivov, s katerimi se morajo v 21. stoletju soočiti Evropa in svet, zlasti države v razvoju, če hočejo zaščititi vodne vire, zagotoviti kakovost in dostopnost vode po vsem svetu ter izboljšati komunikacijo glede ciljev na področju voda in njihovega uresničevanja?
- Considering also the Commission’s upcoming ‘Blueprint to Safeguard Europe’s Water Resources’ and the report on the implementation of EU water legislation currently being discussed in Parliament, what are the main concrete actions proposed by the Commission to address the challenges that both Europe and the world, in particular developing countries, have to face in the 21st century, in order to safeguard water resources, guarantee water quality and availability worldwide, and improve the communication and implementation of water goals?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000014/2012
Question for oral answer O-000014/2012
v imenu Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve Zadeva: Odstopanje pri uporabi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (ESPG) zaradi krize
on behalf of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Subject: European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) crisis derogation
Evropski parlament je podprl predlog Komisije, da se zaradi krize podaljša odstopanje pri uporabi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (ESPG), ki je bilo uvedeno leta 2009 v okviru načrta za oživitev gospodarstva.
The European Parliament has endorsed the Commission’s proposal on the extension of the crisis derogation relating to the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), which was introduced in 2009 as part of the Recovery Plan.
ESPG se je izkazal kot koristno orodje za blaženje posledic gospodarske krize in preprečevanje družbene katastrofe na lokalni ravni, obenem pa je zagotavljal podporo usposabljanju in prekvalifikaciji delavcev za njihovo ponovno zaposlitev v težavnih razmerah na trgu dela.
The EGF proved to be a useful tool in mitigating the results of the economic crisis and preventing social disasters at local level while providing support for the training and retraining of workers with a view to reintegrating them into employment in difficult labour conditions.
Svet EPSCO decembra 2011 ni dosegel političnega sporazuma o predlogu Komisije, zato države članice ne bodo mogle uporabljati tega orodja v podporo delavcem, ki so izgubili zaposlitev neposredno zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize, kot je sicer predvideno v členu 1(1a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006.
Given that the EPSCO Council did not reach a political agreement on the Commission proposal in December 2011, the Member States will not be able to apply for the support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis as provided for in Article 1(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
Pretek odstopanja je treba obravnavati v okviru rastoče stopnje brezposelnosti in nadaljnjega poslabševanja gospodarskih razmer po vsej EU.
The expiry of the derogation has to be seen in the context of increasing unemployment rates and a continued decline in the economic situation across the EU.
Komisija je decembra 2011 prejela 13 vlog za pomoč v okviru odstopanja zaradi krize, med katerimi so bile tri vloge iz države, ki pripada t.i. „manjšini, ki v Svetu blokira odločitev“.
In December 2011, 13 applications under the crisis derogation were received by the Commission, including 3 applications from one country belonging to the so-called ‘blocking minority’ in the Council.
Svet sedaj blokira podaljšanje odstopanja, kar pomeni, da bo po njegovih pričakovanjih krize kmalu konec.
The Council is currently blocking the extension of the derogation, which means that it expects the crisis to be over soon.
Na katere kazalnike in napovedi se opira Svet, da je prišel do take ugotovitve?
Which indicators and forecasts does the Council use to make such a diagnosis?
Zaradi katerih razlogov nekatere države članice zavračajo predlog Komisije?
What are the reasons for which some Member States reject the relevant Commission proposal?
Kakšen časovni načrt je Svet zastavil, da bi dosegli sporazum v času danskega predsedovanja?
What timetable has the Council established with a view of reaching an agreement under the Danish Presidency?
Kako namerava Svet spričo težav pri doseganju dogovora o odstopanju zaradi krize voditi razpravo o predlogu za uredbo o ESPG za obdobje 2014–2020?
In the light of the difficulties in reaching agreement on the crisis derogation, how will the Council manage the debate on the proposal for a regulation on the EGF for the period 2014-2020?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000015/2012
Question for oral answer O-000015/2012
v imenu Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve Zadeva: Zelena knjiga o pravici do združitve družin državljanov tretjih držav, ki živijo v EU (Direktiva 2003/86/ES)
on behalf of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Subject: Green Paper on the right to family reunification of third-country nationals living in the EU (Directive 2003/86/EC)
Direktiva Sveta 2003/86/ES z dne 22. septembra 2003 o pravici do združitve družin v členu 19 določa: „V rednih časovnih presledkih in prvič najkasneje 3. oktobra 2007 Komisija poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te direktive v državah članicah“.
Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification stipulates in its Article 19: ‘Periodically, and for the first time not later than 3 October 2007, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Directive in the Member States’.
Na tej osnovi je nastalo poročilo Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi Direktive 2003/86/ES o pravici do združitve družin z dne 8. oktobra 2008, v poročilu pa je Komisija napovedala, da bo sprožila širše posvetovanje v obliki zelene knjige o prihodnosti režima združevanja družin.
The report from the Commission to Parliament and the Council on the application of Directive 2003/86/EC on the right to family reunification of 8 October 2008 was a result of this exercise and announced the Commission's intention to launch a wider consultation in the form of a Green Paper on the future of the family reunification regime.
Zelena knjiga je bila sprejeta 5. novembra 2011.
This Green Paper was adopted on 5 November 2011.
Ali lahko Komisija natančnejše predstavi razloge, zakaj je do objave zelene knjige prišlo prav v tem času?
Can the Commission specify the reasons that prompted this particular timing for the release of the Green Paper?
Poročilo o izvajanju in zelena knjiga sta opozorila na težave in pomanjkljivosti izvajanja na nacionalni ravni.
The implementation report and Green Paper both identify national implementation problems and shortcomings.
Opozorila sta na težave pri prenosu direktive, zaključila pa z ugotovitvijo, da imajo države članice preveč proste roke pri uporabi izbirnih določb.
They note concerns relating to the transposition of the Directive, and conclude that Member States are left with too much discretion when applying some of its optional provisions.
Kaj je Komisija že storila za odpravo pomanjkljivosti direktive?
What has the Commission done to address the shortcomings of the Directive?
Ali je sprožila kakšen postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev, kot to predvideva člen 258 PDEU?
Has it initiated any infringement proceedings under Article 258 TFEU?
Če tega ni storila, ali lahko pojasni, zakaj ne?
If not, why not?
Ali meni, da je potrebno boljše izvajanje ali nezavezujoči akti (npr. smernice)?
Does it favour better implementation or soft law (e.g. guidelines)?