natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Madžarske opozicijske stranke, madžarske, evropske in mednarodne nevladne organizacije, evropski in mednarodni organi, kot je Beneška komisija, posebni poročevalci ZN, predstavniki vlad in parlamentov držav članic in celo generalni sekretar ZN so vsi izrazili številne resne pomisleke o postopku, ki je bil uporabljen, in o skladnosti osnutka besedila ustave s temeljnimi pravicami, pravno državo in demokracijo, ki temeljijo na ustreznih zavorah in ravnovesjih ter na zaščiti manjšin pred prevlado večine.
Hungarian opposition parties, Hungarian, European and international NGOs, European and international bodies such as the Venice Commission, UN special rapporteurs, representatives of the governments and parliaments of Member States and even the UN Secretary-General have all raised numerous serious concerns about the process followed and the compatibility of the draft text of the Constitution with fundamental rights, the rule of law and democracy based on appropriate checks and balances and protection of minorities against the rule of the majority.
Te vrednote so temelj Evropske unije, saj gre za ustavna načela, skupna vsem državam članicam (člen 2 PEU), ki si jih mora EU prizadevati spoštovati in varovati ter spodbujati njihovo spoštovanje v Evropi.
These values are the basis of the European Union, since they are common constitutional principles shared by the Member States (Article 2 TEU), which the EU must seek to respect, protect and promote in Europe.
5. aprila 2011 je predsednik Komisije na plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta zagotovil, da bo Komisija spremljala to vprašanje ter da bo preverila skladnost osnutka nove madžarske ustave z evropskimi vrednotami, načeli, pogodbami ter evropskim pravom.
On 5 April 2011 the President of the Commission gave assurances to the EP plenary that the Commission would monitor the issue and check the compatibility of the new draft Hungarian Constitution with European values, principles, treaties and law.
Predsednik madžarske vlade Viktor Orban je izjavil, da bi pristal na tako oceno EU.
The Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, stated that he would agree to such an evaluation by the EU.
20. aprila 2011 je skupina ALDE prosila predsednika Komisije, naj se začneta analiza in ocena ustave, da bi se o njej izrazilo mnenje, dala ustrezna priporočila in sprejeli ustrezni ukrepi.
On 20 April 2011 the ALDE Group asked the President of the Commission to go ahead with analysing and evaluating the Constitution in order to express an opinion on it, make the necessary recommendations and take appropriate action.
Beneška komisija bo v naslednjih tednih prav tako sprejela mnenje o tej zadevi.
The Venice Commission will also issue an opinion on the matter over the next few weeks.
Kakšne ukrepe je sprejela Komisija v zvezi z madžarsko ustavo in njeno skladnostjo s členi 2, 6 in 7 PEU, skupnimi demokratičnimi ustavnimi načeli in pravili o volilni pravici za volitve v Evropski parlament?
What action has the Commission taken in relation to the Hungarian Constitution and its compatibility with Articles 2, 6 and 7 TEU, common democratic constitutional principles and the rules on voting rights for EP elections?
Ali je na kakršen koli način posegla v postopek pred sprejetjem in podpisom ustave oziroma po tem?
Did it intervene in the process in any way before or after the Constitution was approved and signed?
Kakšne naknadne ukrepe sprejema sedaj, ko je ustava sprejeta in podpisana?
What follow-up action is it taking now that the Constitution has been approved and signed?
Bo opravila zahtevane ocene?
Will it carry out the evaluation requested?
Kdaj in kako bo to opravila in ali bo upoštevala pripombe Beneške komisije?
When and how will it do this, and will it take into consideration the comments made by the Venice Commission?
Ali bo spremljala izvrševanje ustave ter zagotovila, da ne krši temeljne vrednote in načela EU, ter ali bo v primeru kršitev uporabila ustrezna sredstva, ki jih predvidevajo pogodbe?
Will it monitor the implementation of the Constitution and make sure it does not infringe fundamental EU values and principles, and will it use the appropriate mechanisms envisaged in the Treaties in the event of such an infringement?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000111/2011
Question for oral answer O-000111/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Evropski nalog za prijetje
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: European Arrest Warrant
Izkazalo se je, da je evropski nalog za prijetje učinkovito sredstvo za boj proti čezmejnemu kriminalu in terorizmu.
The European Arrest Warrant has proved to be an effective instrument in fighting cross-border crime and terrorism.
Vendar je njegov sloves postal dvomljiv zaradi poročil, da se uporablja za zaslišanje namesto za pregon in izvrševanje kazni ter za lažja kazniva dejanja, ne da bi se ustrezno presodilo, ali je predaja sorazmerna, ter ne glede na človeške in finančne stroške (ki se ocenjujejo na 25.000 EUR za vsak postopek predaje).
However, its reputation is being tarnished by reports of it being used for questioning instead of prosecution and execution of sentences and minor offences without proper consideration of whether surrender is proportionate, notwithstanding the human and financial costs involved (estimated at EUR 25 000 per surrender procedure).
Nadalje država članica izdajateljica odločitve, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, ne spoštuje vedno, kar pomeni, da je oseba spet aretirana, ko prečka mejo.
Furthermore, the decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant is not always respected by the issuing Member State, meaning the person is arrested again once he or she crosses the border.
Poleg tega osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, nimajo možnosti ustreznega pravnega zastopanja tako v državi članici izdajateljici kot tudi v državi članici izvršiteljici.
In addition, there is no facility for adequate legal representation for persons sought under a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing Member State.
Žal so tudi razmere v zaporih v številnih državah članicah tako slabe, da resno spodkopavajo zaupanje v ustrezno ravnanje z zaporniki, na katerem temeljita evropski nalog za prijetje in okvirni sklep o premestitvi obsojenih oseb, ki bo kmalu pričel veljati.
Finally, sadly, prison conditions in many EU Member States are so poor that they seriously undermine the trust in adequate treatment of prisoners upon which the European Arrest Warrant and the soon to be implemented framework decision on transfer of sentenced persons are based.
– Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da se nesorazmerna raba evropskega naloga za prijetje takoj konča, tako v pravu kot tudi v praksi?
– How is the Council going to guarantee that disproportionate use of the European Arrest Warrant is put to an immediate end both in law and practice?
– Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da imajo osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, dejansko pravico izpodbijati nalog v državi izdajateljici in v državi izvršiteljici, ter da odločitev, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, pomeni tudi odstranitev schengenskega opozorila?
– How is the Council going to ensure that wanted persons under a European Arrest Warrant have an effective right to challenge a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing state and that a decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant leads to a removal of the Schengen alert?
– Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da se v Evropski uniji dvignejo standardi v kazenskem pravosodju ter da se izboljšajo razmere v zaporih, preden v to posežejo sodišča z zaustavitvijo nadaljnjih premestitev zaradi morebitnih kršitev temeljnih človekovih pravic?
– How is the Council going to ensure that criminal justice standards in the European Union are raised and prison conditions improved before the courts step in and block further transfers due to possible violation of the person's fundamental rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000112/2011
Question for oral answer O-000112/2011
- Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se nesorazmerna raba evropskega naloga za prijetje takoj konča, tako v pravu kot tudi v praksi?
- How is the Commission going to guarantee that disproportionate use of the European Arrest Warrant is put to an immediate end both in law and practice?
- Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da imajo osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, dejansko pravico izpodbijati nalog v državi izdajateljici in v državi izvršiteljici, ter da odločitev, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, pomeni tudi odstranitev schengenskega opozorila?
- How is the Commission going to ensure that wanted persons under a European Arrest Warrant have an effective right to challenge a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing state and that a decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant leads to a removal of the Schengen alert?
- Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se v Evropski uniji dvignejo standardi v kazenskem pravosodju ter da se izboljšajo razmere v zaporih, preden v to posežejo sodišča z zaustavitvijo nadaljnjih premestitev zaradi morebitnih kršitev temeljnih človekovih pravic?
- How is the Commission going to ensure that criminal justice standards in the European Union are raised and prison conditions improved before the courts step in and block further transfers due to possible violation of the person's fundamental rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000113/2011
Question for oral answer O-000113/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Kriza v ribiškem sektorju zaradi porasta cen nafte
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Crisis in the fisheries sector due to rise in oil prices
Cene goriva povsod naraščajo, tudi za ribiška plovila.
The price of fuel is increasing everywhere, including for fishing vessels.
Nekateri segmenti ribištva so močno odvisni od fosilnih goriv, stroški zanje pa lahko presegajo polovico celotnih stroškov poslovanja.
Certain segments of the fishing industry are very heavily dependent on fossil fuels, the cost of which can be over half of their operating costs.
Druge segmente to zadeva v veliko manjši meri, saj so njihove ribolovne metode precej manj energetsko intenzivne.
Other segments are much less concerned, since their fishing methods are far less energy intensive.
Na svetovni ravni je ribištvo odgovorno za vsaj 4 % celotne porabe nafte ter enak delež emisij CO2.
Globally, the fishing industry is responsible for at least 4% of total oil use, and an equivalent amount of CO2 emissions.
Nobenega dvoma ni, da se mora ta sektor rešiti svoje odvisnosti od energije iz fosilnih goriv.
The industry clearly needs to wean itself off its dependence on fossil fuel energy.
Ribištvo je s statusom davčne oprostitve in novimi pravili de minimis že deležno obsežnih subvencij za gorivo.
The fishing industry already enjoys a large fuel subsidy, given its tax exempt status and the new de minimis rules.
Ali Komisija namerava zmanjšati ali odpraviti davčno oprostitev za gorivo, da bi zmanjšala energetsko odvisnost ribištva?
Does the Commission intend to reduce or eliminate the fuel tax exemption in the interests of reducing the energy dependence of the fishing industry?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000114/2011
Question for oral answer O-000114/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Stališče EU o Libiji
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: EU position on Libya
EU se je na ljudsko vstajo in civilno vojno v Libiji odzvala oklevaje in pozno.
The EU reactions to the popular uprising and the civil war in Libya have been rather hesitant and tardy.
Sredi februarja so se Komisija in libijske oblasti pogajale o okvirnem sporazumu EU-Libija in svežnju finančne pomoči v višini 50 milijonov EUR, medtem ko so Libijci protestirali na ulicah Tripolija in Bengazija.
In mid-February the Commission and the Libyan authorities negotiated the EU-Libya Framework Agreement and the implementation of a EUR 50 million financial assistance package - while the people of Libya demonstrated in the streets of Tripoli and Benghazi.
Teden dni kasneje je Svet pozval k dialogu, ki bi ga vodila Libija, da bi razmere umirili.
A week later the Council called for a ‘Libyan-led dialogue’ to calm down the situation.
Dan zatem je Gadafi razžalil libijsko ljudstvo, ko ga je imenoval „podgane“ in „ščurki“.
Next day Mr Gaddafi insulted the people of Libya, calling them ‘rats’ and ‘cockroaches’.
EU pred glasovanjem o resoluciji varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1973 ni dosegla skupnega stališča o Libiji.
The EU had no common stance on Libya prior to the vote on UN Security Council resolution 1973.
Nemčija se je vzdržala, Francija, Združeno kraljestvo in Portugalska pa so glasovale za to resolucijo.
Germany abstained while France, the UK and Portugal voted for the resolution.
Francija in Združeno kraljestvo sta bila vodilna v procesu, medtem ko se je vodja zunanje politike EU, visoka predstavnica Catherine Ashton, v glavnem le odzivala.
France and the UK have led the process while the EU foreign policy chief, High Representative Catherine Ashton, has for the most part only reacted.
EU je ostala na stranskem tiru in ni dala bistvenih pobud.
The EU has been on the side track and has made no significant initiatives.
Ali si je visoka predstavnica Ashton prizadevala za uskladitev skupnega stališča EU pred glasovanjem v varnostnem svetu Združenih narodov o resoluciji 1973?
Did HR Ashton try to coordinate a common EU stance prior to the UN Security Council vote on resolution 1973?
Razmere v Libiji med Gadafijevimi silami in uporniki so na mrtvi točki.
The situation in Libya is a stalemate between the Gaddafi forces and the rebels.
Katere so naslednji koraki, ki jih je treba v bližnji prihodnosti narediti v Libiji?
What are the next immediate steps in Libya?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000115/2011
Question for oral answer O-000115/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Pogodba o trgovini z orožjem
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Arms trade treaty
Države članice EU so pomembne izvoznice orožja.
EU Member States are significant arms exporters.
Med desetimi največjimi izvozniki orožja na svetu jih kar sedem prihaja iz EU.
Seven out of the ten biggest arms exporters in the world come from the EU.
Zadnja leta so številne države EU izvažale orožje in oborožitveno tehnologijo v Severno Afriko in na Bližnji vzhod (vključno z Libijo, Egiptom, Tunizijo, Jemnom in Bahrajnom); Italija in Francija sta orožje v Libijo izvažali vse do leta 2010.
In recent years numerous EU countries have exported arms and arms technologies to North Africa and to the Middle East (including Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen and Bahrain); Italy and France exported arms to Libya as late as 2010.
Za prenos orožja ni svetovnih norm.
There are no global norms on arms transfers.
OZN, ki pripravlja svetovno pogodbo o prodaji orožja, bo leta 2012 organiziral konferenco o tej pogodbi.
The UN is in a process of preparing a global arms trade treaty and will hold a conference on the treaty in 2012.
Lani poleti je bila ustanovljena delovna skupina za pripravo pogodbe in konference.
A working group to prepare the treaty and the conference was established last summer.
Do sedaj se je sestala dvakrat, naslednje srečanje pa bo potekalo julija letos.
The working group has now convened twice and will convene again in July this year.
Korupcija na področju varnosti in obrambe, zlasti v prodaji orožja, je velik in večplasten problem, ki se mu je treba bolj posvetiti.
Corruption within the security and defence sector, particularly in the arms trade, is a big and multifaceted problem and needs more attention.
Skupno stališče EU o nadzoru izvoza vojaške tehnologije in opreme iz leta 2008 ne vsebuje členov o korupciji.
The EU Common Position on Control of Exports of Military Technology and Equipment (2008) does not include articles on corruption.
Katere so prednostne naloge EU glede svetovne pogodbe o prodaji orožja?
What are the EU priorities for the global arms trade treaty?
Kako namerava EU v svetovni pogodbi o prodaji orožja zagotoviti zadostna merila o korupciji?
How will the EU safeguard sufficient criteria on corruption in the global arms trade treaty?
Katera so merila EU?
What are the EU benchmarks?
Ali bo Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje / Svet pripravila skupno stališče EU o korupciji pri prodaji orožja in ali take priprave že potekajo?
Will the EEAS / Council prepare a common EU position on corruption in the arms trade or are any such preparations under way?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000116/2011
Question for oral answer O-000116/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Politične razmere na Madagaskarju
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: The political situation in Madagascar
V zadnjih mesecih sta Evropski parlament in Skupna parlamentarna skupščina AKP-EU sprejela več resolucij, ki nedvomno obsojajo številne kršitve in zlorabe oblasti s strani organov pregona sedanjih madagaskarskih oblasti v škodo lastnega prebivalstva, pa tudi ki mednarodno skupnost opozarjajo, da je treba na Madagaskarju nujno ponovno vzpostaviti institucionalni red.
Over the last few months both the European Parliament and the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly have adopted resolutions not only condemning, in no uncertain terms, the many abuses committed by the security forces of Madagascar’s current authorities against their own people, but also informing the international community of the need for the institutional situation in Madagascar to be brought back to normal as soon as possible.
Afriška unija je na vrhunskem srečanju 31. januarja 2011 potrdila individualne in selektivne sankcije, ki jih je sprejela na vrhunskem srečanju 17. marca 2010, proti Andryju Rajoelini in več kot stotim drugim osebam, ki podpirajo visoko prehodno oblast, katere vlade ne priznavajo ne Evropska unija niti nobena od držav mednarodne kontaktne skupine za Madagaskar.
At its summit of 31 January 2011, the African Union confirmed the individual and selective sanctions it had decided upon, at its summit of 17 March 2010, targeting Andry Rajoelina and more than 100 other people involved in the High Transitional Authority (HAT), whose government is not recognised by the EU or by any of the member countries of the International Contact Group on Madagascar.
S sklepom z 31. marca je južnoafriška razvojna skupnost predvidela tudi izredno vrhunsko srečanje za obravnavanje primera Madagaskarja.
The SADC’s decision of 31 March also provides for an extraordinary summit to be held, focusing on the specific case of Madagascar.
Ali ne bi morala torej Komisija pred tem vrhunskim srečanjem odločneje nastopiti do dejanske oblasti na Madagaskarju v zvezi z vprašanjem ponovne vzpostavitve ustavnega reda?
With this in mind, and in the run-up to the summit, should the Commission not be taking a tougher line on the de facto authorities in Madagascar, with a view to ensuring that there is a return to constitutional order?
Ali madagaskarski narod ne pričakuje upravičeno odločen znak iz Evrope, ki bi mu povrnil upanje?
Do the people of Madagascar not have the right to expect Europeans to send a clear message to restore their hope?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000117/2011
Question for oral answer O-000117/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Evropski nalog za prijetje
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: European Arrest Warrant
Komisija v svojem nedavnem sporočilu (KOM(2011)0175) poudarja, da se je evropski nalog za prijetje pokazal kot učinkovit instrument za boj proti čezmejnemu kriminalu, organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu.
As highlighted in a recent report by the Commission (COM(2011)0175), the European Arrest Warrant has proven to be an effective instrument in fighting cross-border crime, organised crime and terrorism.
Vendar, kot opozarja Komisija, lahko njegov ugled in učinkovitost zamajejo poročila, da se uporablja za zasliševanje namesto za pregon in izvrševanje kazni ter za lažja kazniva dejanja brez primerne presoje, ali je predaja sorazmerna, in ne glede na kadrovske in finančne stroške, ki po ocenah ene od držav članic znašajo 25.000 EUR za vsak postopek predaje.
However, as pointed out by the Commission, there is potential for its reputation and effectiveness to be undermined by reports of it being used for questioning instead of prosecution and execution of sentences and for minor offences, without proper consideration of whether surrender is proportionate and notwithstanding the human and financial costs involved (estimated by one Member State at EUR 25 000 per surrender procedure).
V nekaterih primerih osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, v državi članici izdajateljici in v državi članici izvršiteljici nimajo možnosti ustreznega pravnega zastopanja.
In some cases there are no facilities for adequate legal representation of persons sought under a European Arrest Warrant in the issuing and executing Member States.
Poleg tega lahko razmere v zaporih v številnih državah članicah EU omajajo zaupanje v ustrezno ravnanje z zaporniki, na katerem temeljita evropski nalog za prijetje in okvirni sklep o premestitvi obsojenih oseb, ki bo kmalu pričel veljati.
Furthermore, prison conditions in many EU Member States can potentially undermine the trust in appropriate treatment of prisoners upon which the European Arrest Warrant and the soon-to-be-implemented framework decision on the transfer of sentenced persons are based.
- Ali Svet meni, da se je evropski nalog za prijetje pokazal kot koristen instrument in da je prinesel želene rezultate?
– Does the Council consider the EAW to have been a useful instrument and to have attained its objectives?
- Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti, da se bo nesorazmerna raba evropskega naloga za prijetje v praksi končala?
– What steps does the Council intend to take to guarantee that disproportionate use of the European Arrest Warrant is put to an end in practice?
- Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti, da bodo imele osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, dejansko pravico do pravnega svetovanja v državi izdajateljici in v državi izvršiteljici, ter da odločitev, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, pomeni tudi odstranitev schengenskega opozorila?
– How does the Council intend to ensure that persons wanted under a European Arrest Warrant have an effective right to legal advice in both the issuing and the executing states and that a decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant results in the removal of the Schengen alert?
- Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da standardi kazenskega prava in razmere v zaporih v Evropski uniji ne bodo več vzbujale nezaupanja v pravosodne sisteme držav članic?
– How is Council going to ensure that criminal justice standards and prison conditions in the European Union are not a source of mistrust for Member States’ judicial systems?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000118/2011
Question for oral answer O-000118/2011
- Ali Komisija meni, da se je evropski nalog za prijetje pokazal kot koristen instrument in da je prinesel želene rezultate?
- Does the Commission consider the EAW to have been a useful instrument and to have attained its objectives?
- Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da se bo nesorazmerna raba evropskega naloga za prijetje v praksi končala?
- What steps does the Commission intend to take to guarantee that disproportionate use of the European Arrest Warrant is put to an end in practice?
- Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da bodo imele osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, dejansko pravico do pravnega svetovanja v državi izdajateljici in v državi izvršiteljici, ter da odločitev, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, pomeni tudi odstranitev schengenskega opozorila?
- How does the Commission intend to ensure that persons wanted under a European Arrest Warrant have an effective right to legal advice in both the issuing and the executing states and that a decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant results in the removal of the Schengen alert?
- Katere predloge namerava Komisija predložiti, da standardi kazenskega prava in razmere v zaporih v Evropski uniji ne bodo več vzbujale nezaupanja v pravosodne sisteme držav članic?
- What proposals does the Commission intend to present with a view to ensuring that criminal justice standards and prison conditions in the European Union are not a source of mistrust for Member States’ judicial systems?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000119/2011
Question for oral answer O-000119/2011