natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kakšne ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela za učinkovito vključitev držav članic v takšne projekte?
What measures will the Commission take in order to effectively engage the Member States in such projects?
Ali lahko Komisija predvidi načrt za uvedbo splošnega posvetovanja z državljani, opredeljujoč vmesne korake, ki bi v celoti izkoristili možnosti, ki jih nudi e-glasovanje?
Can the Commission foresee a roadmap for developing the general consultation of citizens, providing for intermediate steps that would fully exploit the means provided by e-voting?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0017/09/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0017/09/rev.1
Zadeva: Ureditev poimenovanja koncentracijskih taborišč
Subject: Names used to describe concentration camps
Evropski parlament pri svojem delu posebno pozornost posveča zaščiti človekovih pravic.
In the course of its activities, the European Parliament devotes special attention to the protection of human rights.
V sprejetih resolucijah odločno obsoja vsakršno omejevanje svobode, še posebej primere genocida.
In the resolutions it adopts it firmly opposes all restrictions on freedom and condemns cases of genocide in particular.
Genocid je najhujši zločin, ki ga je treba vedno in povsod obsojati.
Genocide is the most serious of all crimes and must be condemned whenever and wherever it occurs.
Na žalost zadnje čase prihaja do vse pogostejših primerov, ko tisti, ki so zakrivili zločine proti človeštvu, krivdo prevračajo na žrtve.
Unfortunately, all too often in recent times the perpetrators of crimes against humanity have attempted to shift the blame to the victims of those crimes.
Proti temu je treba odločno ukrepati, kakor tudi proti vsem drugim poskusom izkrivljanja zgodovine.
This tendency must be firmly opposed, as must all other attempts to pervert history.
V številnih držav je prišlo do splošnega zgražanja zaradi poimenovanja, na primer poimenovanja nemških koncentracijskih taborišč kot poljskih ali latvijskih.
The practice of describing German concentration camps as 'Polish' or 'Latvian' concentration camps has caused upset and widespread concern in many countries.
To se je med drugim dogajalo v primeru koncentracijskih taborišč Oświęcim, Treblinka, Trawniki in Majdanek, ki je bil v časniku „Die Welt” nedavno poimenovan kot „poljsko koncentracijsko taborišče Majdanek”.
This has happened in the case of the camps at Auschwitz, Treblinka and Trawniki, while the German daily Die Welt recently described Majdanek as a 'Polish concentration camp'.
Ali se Evropska komisija zaveda tega problema in kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti?
Is the Commission aware of this problem and what measures does it plan to take?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0018/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0018/09
Zadeva: Uresničevanje enotnega območja plačil v eurih (območja SEPA)
Subject: Implementation of the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA)
Prehod na sistem bančnih nakazil v okviru sistema SEPA (SCT), s čimer je to območje uradno začelo veljati 28. januarja 2008, je bil doslej precej počasen.
Migration to SEPA Credit Transfer (SCT), which launched SEPA officially on 28 January 2008, has been quite hesitant up to now.
Udeleženci na trgu niso najbolj pripravljeni opustiti nacionalnih plačilnih instrumentov.
Market participants seem to be reluctant to abolish national payment instruments.
Zaradi tega bi bilo zelo težko doseči kritično maso, ohranila bi se razdrobljenost, pričakovane koristi bančne industrije ter njenih strank pa ne bi bile uresničene.
Consequently, it would be very difficult to reach a critical mass, fragmentation would persist, and anticipated benefits for the banking industry as well as for its clients could not be achieved.
Poleg tega se obetajo nekatere težave v zvezi z začetkom izvajanja instrumenta SEPA za neposredno bremenitev, zlasti v zvezi z uporabo večstranske pristojbine za izmenjavo (MIF), pa tudi v zvezi z nemotenim in preprostim prehodom z obstoječega načina neposrednih bremenitev na ustrezni sistem SEPA.
Furthermore, problems are looming with regard to the launch of the SEPA direct debit instrument, in particular as regards the application of a multilateral interchange fee (MIF), but also concerning the smooth and simple migration of existing direct debit mandates to the SEPA direct debit scheme.
Uporaba večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo je vprašljiva tudi v zvezi s plačili s karticami.
The application of an MIF is also an issue with regard to card payments.
Ali lahko glede na to Komisija pojasni:
Against this background, would the Commission explain:
Kako namerava spodbujati in podpirati prehod na instrumente SEPA?
How it intends to promote and foster the migration to SEPA instruments?
Ali še vedno meni, da bi bilo do konca leta 2010 mogoče doseči kritično maso plačil, ki bodo prenesena na instrumente SEPA?
Whether it is still of the opinion that a critical mass of payments having migrated to SEPA instruments could be reached by the end of 2010?
Ali meni, da je potreben jasen in zavezujoč rok za prehod na instrumente SEPA in če da, kateri datum naj bi bil določen, kako bi ga uveljavili in kdaj bo znan?
Whether it thinks that a clear and binding end-date for migration to SEPA instruments is necessary and, if so, what that date could be, in which way it could be imposed and when it would be communicated?
Kako bi okrepili pravno varnost v zvezi s sistemom SEPA glede neposrednih bremenitev, zlasti v zvezi z uporabo večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo ter natančno dolžino trajanja prehodnega obdobja, v katerem bi bile večstranske pristojbine za izmenjavo dovoljene tudi za čezmejne neposredne bremenitve, pa tudi z zvezi s prehodom z obstoječih načinov neposrednih bremenitev na ustrezni sistem SEPA?
How legal certainty regarding the SEPA direct debit scheme could be enhanced, in particular as regards the application of an MIF and the exact length of the transitional phase during which an MIF might also be allowed for cross-border direct debits, but also regarding the migration of existing direct debit mandates to the SEPA direct debit scheme?
Kako bo obravnavala vprašanje večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo v zvezi s plačili s karticami?
How it plans to tackle the issue of MIF with regard to card payments?
Glede na to, da ima bančni sektor težave pri iskanju ustrezne rešitve, ali ni naloga Komisije, ki je opozorila na vprašanja v zvezi z obstoječimi večstranskimi pristojbinami za izmenjavo, da predlaga konkretno rešitev?
Regarding the difficulties for the industry to build a proper solution, is it not for the Commission, which has pointed to concerns about existing MIF, to propose a specific solution?
Katere konkretne ukrepe bo Komisija predlagala glede na sedanjo krizo, da bi zagotovila, da zaradi prehoda na instrumente SEPA ne bo prišlo do dražjega plačilnega sistema?
In the current context of the crisis, what specific measures does the Commission intend to propose to make sure that migration to the SEPA instruments will not result in a more expensive payment system?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0019/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0019/09
Zadeva: Strategija EU za vseobsegajoči sporazum o podnebnih spremembah v Köbenhavnu in ustrezno financiranje politike o podnebnih spremembah
Subject: EU strategy for a comprehensive climate change agreement in Copenhagen and the adequate provision of financing for climate change policy
Katere ukrepe namerava Svet sprejeti in katere ravni financiranja načrtuje za podporo blažitvi in prilagajanju ter zmanjšanju krčenja gozdov v državah v razvoju, da bi omogočil sklenitev vseobsegajočega sporazuma v Köbenhavnu decembra 2009 in izpolnil svoje obveznosti do držav v razvoju?
What measures does the Council plan to take, and what levels of finance does it plan to commit to, to support mitigation and adaptation and reduce deforestation in developing countries, in order to enable a comprehensive agreement to be reached in Copenhagen in December 2009 and to live up to its responsibility to the developing world?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0020/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0020/09
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, kateri finančni ukrepi EU in katere ravni financiranja iz proračuna EU so po njenem mnenju najprimernejše, da bi države v razvoju spodbudili k zniževanju emisij toplogrednih plinov in k podpisu vseobsegajočega sporazuma v Köbenhavnu decembra 2009?
Could the Commission clarify which financing measures and funding levels by the EU it considers to be most suited to providing incentives for developing countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and to sign off a comprehensive agreement in Copenhagen in December 2009?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0021/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0021/09
Zadeva: Izvajanje smernic za politike zaposlovanja držav članic v obdobju 2008-2010
Subject: Implementation of the guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States 2008-2010
Sedanja gospodarska kriza je evropskim trgom dela prinesla neslutene izzive in ogrozila socialno kohezijo.
The present economic crisis is bringing unprecedented challenges to European labour markets and threats to social cohesion.
Kako namerava Komisija izboljšati usklajevanje politike ter s tem podpreti države članice pri izvajanju strukturnih reform in zagotavljanju, da bodo kratkoročni ukrepi prispevali k doseganju dolgoročnih ciljev?
What are the Commission's plans to improve policy coordination to support the Member States in implementing the structural reforms and in ensuring that short-term measures contribute to achieving the long-term objectives?
Kako lahko Skupnost in države članice glede na svoje pristojnosti najbolje omejijo negativne socialne učinke krize?
How can the Community and the Member States, according to their respective competences, best limit the negative social impact of the crisis?
Kako namerava Komisija spodbujati ustrezno socialno zaščito in okrepiti boj proti revščini v času, ko je na milijone Evropejcev izgubilo delo ali pa ga bodo v bližnji prihodnosti?
How does the Commission intend to promote adequate social protection and reinforce the fight against poverty in times when millions of European workers have lost their jobs or are likely to do so in the very near future?
Kakšne politične ukrepe namerava Komisija podpreti, da bi poskrbela za boljšo zaposljivost delavcev in zagotovila, da bodo imeli posamezniki, zlasti iz najbolj ogroženih skupin, veščine, ki jih zahtevajo evropska podjetja na poti h gospodarski oživitvi?
What policy measures does the Commission intend to promote in order to ensure that workers’ employability is enhanced and that individuals, in particular the most vulnerable groups, have the skills required by European businesses on the road to recovery?
Kako namerava Komisija spodbuditi zaupanje in lastništvo ter izboljšati sodelovanje vseh zadevnih akterjev pri izvajanju takojšnjih ukrepov in programa strukturne reforme?
How does the Commission intend to promote confidence and ownership and improve the participation of all actors concerned in the implementation of immediate actions as well as of the structural reform agenda?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0022/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0022/09
Zadeva: Otroci migrantov
Subject: Children of immigrants
Položaj otrok migrantov v EU, ki ostanejo v državi članici izvora, potem ko se njihovi starši zaradi dela preselijo v drugo državo članico, je v zadnjih dveh letih v nekaterih državah članicah sprožil veliko skrbi.
The situation of children of EU migrants that are left on their own in the Member State of origin while their parents migrate for work to another Member State has raised considerable concern in some Member States in the last two years.
Medtem ko je za izboljšanje življenja in izobrazbe otrok migrantov, ki so se s starši preselili v tujino, poskrbljeno z različnimi politikami, je bilo otrokom, ki ostanejo sami doma, posvečene malo pozornosti.
While policies do exist with the aim of improving the living conditions and education of migrant children who moved with their parents working abroad, the phenomenon of children left at home on their own has received little attention.
Po raziskavi, ki sta jo v Romuniji opravila Unicef in revija Social Alternatives, je leta 2008 skoraj 350.000 otrok imelo vsaj enega od staršev na delu v tujini, 126.000 otrok pa oba.
According to the study made by Unicef and Social Alternatives in Romania, almost 350 000 children in 2008 had at least one parent who was working abroad, and nearly 126 000 had both parents working abroad.
Otroci, ki ostanejo doma, lahko postanejo žrtev zanemarjanja in pomanjkanja starševske skrbi.
The children left behind are at risk of losing care and parental attention.
Prav tako se utegne zgoditi, da nihče ne skrbi za njihovo telesno in duševno zdravje, izpostavljeni so motnjam duševnega zdravja, kot je depresija, nimajo prostega časa za igro in razvoj, manjkajo pri šolskem pouku ter niso udeleženi v izobraževanju in usposabljanju nasploh, so lahko žrtve nedohranjenosti in zlorab.
They are at risk of general lack in care as regards physical and mental health, mental-health related effects such as depression, losing free time to play and develop, lack of school participation and general participation in education and training, malnutrition and child abuse.
Kaj so že in kaj bodo države članice in Svet ukrenili, da bi izboljšali položaj teh otrok ter jim omogočili normalen razvoj?
What steps have been and will be taken by the Member States and the Council to improve the situation of these children and to ensure their normal development?
Zelo zaskrbljujoča so tudi poročila o slabem življenjskem slogu in pomanjkanju skrbi za te otroke v smislu izobraževanja.
Reports about these children’s poor lifestyle and the lack of care in terms of education and also affection are very worrying.
Ali je Svet obveščen o tem, kako se ti otroci in njihovi starši spopadajo s tem položajem?
Does the Council have information about how these children and their parents cope with this situation?
Kako bodo ukrepale države članice in gostujoči delavci, ki so pustili otroke v matični državi, ter kateri ukrepi bodo sprejeti na evropski ravni, da bi zagotovili normalen razvoj teh otrok v smislu izobraževanja in družbenega življenja?
What steps have been and will be taken by the Member States hosting workers who have left children in their country of origin, and at European level to ensure a normal development of the children concerned in terms of education and social contacts?
To težavo naj bi bilo zaslediti v več državah članicah.
Reportedly, the phenomenon affects several Member States.
Ali je v Svetu že potekala izmenjava mnenj med državami članicami ali razprava o najboljši praksi in o tem, kako izboljšati položaj?
In the Council, has there been an exchange of views or a discussion about best practice between Member States on how to improve the situation?
Ali so države članice vzpostavile mehanizme sodelovanja, da bi preprečile škodljive učinke, ki jih imajo ločeno življenje in velike razdalje na družine, zlasti otroke?
Have the Member States set up cooperation mechanisms to prevent the deteriorating effects on families, especially children, of living apart and of the distances they have to bridge?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0023/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0023/09
Zadeva: Otroci migrantov
Subject: Children of migrants
Prav tako se utegne zgoditi, da nihče ne skrbi za njihovo telesno in duševno zdravje, izpostavljeni so motnjam duševnega zdravja, kot je depresija, nimajo prostega časa za igro in razvoj, manjkajo pri šolskem pouku ter niso udeleženi v izobraževanju in usposabljanju nasploh, so lahko žrtve nedohranjenosti in zlorab.
They are at risk of general lack of care as regards physical and mental health, mental-health related effects such as depression, losing free time to play and develop, lack of school participation and general participation in education and training, malnutrition and child abuse.
Ali namerava Komisija opraviti raziskavo, s katero bo ocenila razsežnost teh razmer?
Does the Commission plan a study to assess the extent of the situation?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da reševanje vprašanja otrok priseljencev ni samo naloga vlad v državah izvora, temveč tudi vlad držav, ki imajo koristi od delavcev migrantov na trgu delovne sile?
Does the Commission believe that the subject of the children of migrant workers is not only a matter for the government in the sending country but also for the governments of the countries that benefit from the presence of the migrant workers on their labour market?
Ali namerava Komisija opraviti raziskavo o morebitnih posebnih informacijskih sistemih za delavce migrante, ki bodo vsebovali podatke o družinskih članih v državi gostiteljici, šolanju in izobraževanju, učenju jezikov in zagotavljanju otroškega varstva?
Does the Commission intend to carry out research into possible specialised information systems for migrant workers, as regards information for family members in the host country, on schooling and education, language learning and child care provisions?
Ali bi bilo to mogoče izvesti v programu EURES?
Would this feasible under the EURES scheme?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0024/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0024/09
Zadeva: Začasni trgovinski sporazum med EU in Turkmenistanom
Subject: Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) between the EU and Turkmenistan
Ali lahko Svet Evropskemu parlamentu pojasni naslednje:
Can the Council explain to Parliament:
Zaradi katerih konkretnih vzrokov Svet meni, da je prav zdaj upravičeno podpisati začasni trgovinski sporazum?
What are the concrete reasons why the Council considers it justified to sign the ITA now?
Zakaj želi Svet nadaljevati ta postopek, upoštevajoč splošne razmere v Turkmenistanu, zlasti na področju človekovih pravic, demokracije in svobode veroizpovedi?
Why does the Council wish to continue with this process, taking into account the general situation in Turkmenistan, especially in the fields of human rights, democracy and freedom of religion?
Kakšni so komentarji Sveta na več poročil nevladnih organizacij in na druga relevantna mnenja v Turkmenistanu o razmerah v državi?
What is the Council’s position on the various reports by NGOs and others in Turkmenistan concerning the general situation in the country?
Kako bo začasni trgovinski sporazum konkretno izboljšal odnose med EU in Turkmenistanom?
What concrete improvements will the ITA bring to the relationship between the EU and Turkmenistan?
Na podlagi česa Svet ocenjuje, da bo EU po sklenitvi začasnega trgovinskega sporazuma uspešna pri prizadevanju za spoštovanje človekovih pravic v Turkmenistanu?
On what basis does the Council believe that the EU will be successful in advancing human rights in Turkmenistan after concluding an ITA?
Zakaj meni, da je sklenitev omenjenega sporazuma za EU učinkovitejši način za promocijo človekovih pravic v tej državi?
Why does it believe that concluding an ITA is the most effective way for the EU to advance the cause of human rights in Turkmenistan?
Kako bi lahko začasni trgovinski sporazum konkretno izboljšal razmere v Turkmenistanu, zlasti v zvezi s spoštovanjem človekovih pravic in demokracijo?
What concrete improvements is the ITA likely to bring to the situation in Turkmenistan, especially concerning respect for human rights and democracy?
Ali bo sporazum o partnerstvu vseboval jasno odložno klavzulo o človekovih pravicah?
Will the PCA include a clear suspensive human rights clause?
Ali bo Svet začasno ustavil izvajanje omenjenega trgovinskega sporazuma, če bo to zahteval Evropski parlament?
Will the Council suspend the ITA if requested to do so by Parliament?
Ali bo sporazum o partnerstvu vseboval klavzulo o reviziji?
Will the PCA include a revision clause?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0025/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0025/09
Ali lahko Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu pojasni naslednje:
Can the Commission explain to Parliament:
Zaradi katerih konkretnih vzrokov Komisija meni, da je prav zdaj upravičeno podpisati začasni trgovinski sporazum?
What are the concrete reasons why the Commission considers it justified to sign the ITA now?
Zakaj želi Komisija nadaljevati ta postopek, upoštevajoč splošne razmere v Turkmenistanu, zlasti na področju človekovih pravic, demokracije in svobode veroizpovedi?
Why does the Commission wish to continue with this process, taking into account the general situation in Turkmenistan, especially in the fields of human rights, democracy and freedom of religion?
Kakšni so komentarji Komisije na več poročil nevladnih organizacij in na druga relevantna mnenja v Turkmenistanu o razmerah v državi?
What is the Commission’s position on the various reports by NGOs and others in Turkmenistan concerning the general situation in the country?
Na podlagi česa Komisija ocenjuje, da bo EU po sklenitvi začasnega trgovinskega sporazuma uspešna pri prizadevanju za spoštovanje človekovih pravic v Turkmenistanu?
On what basis does the Commission believe that the EU will be successful in advancing human rights in Turkmenistan after concluding an ITA?
Ali bo Komisija začasno ustavila izvajanje omenjenega trgovinskega sporazuma, če bo to zahteval Evropski parlament?
Will the Commission suspend the ITA if requested to do so by Parliament?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0026/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0026/09
Zadeva: Peti svetovni forum o vodah v Carigradu od 16. do 22. marca 2009
Subject: 5th World Water Forum in Istanbul, 16 - 22 March 2009
Ali Komisija v zvezi s tem priznava, da je treba podpirati procese decentralizacije kot sredstvo, ki bo olajšalo lokalno upravljanje voda ter zagotovilo uporabo lokalnega strokovnega znanja, in ali bo to načelo zagovarjala v Carigradu?
In this connection, does the Commission recognise the need to support decentralisation processes as a way of facilitating local management of water and making use of local expertise, and will it defend this principle in Istanbul?
Poleg tega je prehrambena kriza pokazala, da je za večjo lokalno neodvisnost treba razviti nove tehnike, kot sta namakanje na podeželskih območjih in ureditev zelenih pasov okoli mest.
Furthermore, the food crisis has revealed the need to develop new techniques such as irrigation of rural areas and the creation of green belts around towns and cities in order to strengthen local autonomy.
Ali je Komisija pripravljena takšno prakso zagovarjati, da bi vsem prebivalcem, zlasti najrevnejšim, zagotovila zadostno preskrbo s kakovostno pitno vodo, kakor se je obvezala v sporočilu z dne 12. marca 2002 o upravljanju voda v državah v razvoju (KOM(2002)0132)?
Could the Commission indicate whether it is prepared to champion these practices in order to ensure that everyone, especially the poorest, is supplied with sufficient good quality drinking water, as it promised in its Communication of 12 March 2002 on water management in developing countries (COM(2002)0132)?
Kako namerava Komisija upoštevati poziv Evropskega parlamenta iz njegove resolucije z dne 15. marca 2006 o četrtem svetovnem forumu o vodah v Mexico Cityju ( P6_TA(2006)0087 ) k spodbujanju alternativnih načinov solidarnega financiranja upravljanja voda, kot je Oudinov zakon v Franciji?
Finally, how does the Commission intend to comply with the call from the European Parliament in its resolution of 15 March 2006 on the Fourth World Water Forum in Mexico City ( P6_TA(2006)0087 ) to encourage alternative forms of funding for water designed to show solidarity, such as the Oudin law in France?
Kako Komisija, kar zadeva načelo o delitvi dela, usklajuje ukrepe na področju upravljanja voda s svojimi partnerji?
With regard to the principle of the 'division of labour', how does the Commission coordinate and harmonise its action with its partners in the field of water?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0027/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0027/09
Zadeva: Pogajanja o pogojih v zvezi z začetkom veljavnosti konvencije za varno in okolju prijazno recikliranje ladij, ki bodo potekala maja 2009 pod okriljem Mednarodne pomorske organizacije
Subject: Negotiations taking place in May 2009 under the auspices of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) on the conditions for the entry into force of the Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships