natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Posredne škodljive posledice utegnejo nastopiti tudi za druge sektorje, vključno s sektorjem prašičjega mesa.
There may be indirect adverse consequences for other sectors, including the pigmeat sector.
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni:
Could the Commission explain:
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0068/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0068/10
Zadeva: Posledice finančne in gospodarske krize za strategijo EU 2020 in za njeno upravljanje
Subject: Consequences of the financial and economic crisis for the EU 2020 strategy and its governance
Kakšne so s stališča Sveta posledice finančne in gospodarske krize ter zlasti vpliv svežnja ukrepov za reševanje evroobmočja za strategijo EU 2020 in njeno upravljanje?
What, in the Council’s view, are the consequences of the financial and economic crisis, particularly in terms of the impact of the eurozone rescue package, for the EU 2020 strategy and its governance?
Ali se je spremenilo stališče Sveta glede evroobveznic kot sredstva za financiranje trajnostnih javnih naložb in torej kot orodja za strategijo EU 2020?
Has the Council position evolved regarding eurobonds as a means of financing sustainable public investments and therefore as a tool for the 2020 strategy?
Ali se je Svet pripravljen spoprijeti z vprašanjem notranjih neravnotežij, da bi se osredotočil na prevelike primanjkljaje, pa tudi presežke držav članic, in tako okrepil usklajevanje gospodarske politike?
Is the Council ready to tackle the issue of internal imbalances in order to target not only excessive deficits, but also surplus Member States, as a means of reinforcing economic policy coordination?
Državne dolžniške krize jasno kažejo, da sta javna in zasebna dolžniška kriza močno medsebojno povezani in da je treba zato znatno okrepiti finančni nadzor.
The sovereign debt crises both show clearly that the public and private debt crises are strongly interlinked and therefore that financial supervision must be substantially reinforced.
Ali bo Svet v naslednjih tednih pokazal, da se je začel učiti iz izkušenj iz kaotičnih zadnjih dveh let in bo torej drastično okrepil svoje stališče o svežnju o nadzoru?
Will the Council show in the coming weeks that it has started to learn the lessons of the last two chaotic years and hence drastically strengthen its position on the supervision package?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Svet za boljše usklajevanje fiskalnih politik držav članic, zlasti kar zadeva obdavčitev podjetij in obdavčitev finančnih transakcij, da bi zagotovil vzpostavitev enotnega trga, ki bo bolj ustrezal pomislekom in pričakovanjem državljanov EU?
With a view to delivering a single market which will correspond more closely to EU citizens’ concerns and expectations, what measures does the Council envisage taking in order to ensure better coordination among Member States’ fiscal policies, in particular regarding company taxation and taxation of financial transactions?
Ali Svet podpira okvirno zakonodajo o storitvah splošnega gospodarskega interesa, v skladu z novim členom 14 pogodbe in njenim protokolom o storitvah splošnega interesa?
Does the Council support framework legislation on Services of General Economic Interest, in line with the new Article 14 of the Treaty and its Protocol on Services of General Interest?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0069/2010
Question for oral answer O-0069/2010
Zadeva: Ustanovitev evropskih enot civilne zaščite
Subject: Creation of a European civil protection force
Ob nedavnih tragičnih naravnih nesrečah se je zopet pokazala potreba po izboljšanju sposobnosti odzivanja na krize v Evropski uniji, tako v Evropi kot zunaj nje.
Following the tragic natural disasters which have occurred recently, it has again become necessary to improve the European Union's crisis response capabilities, both inside and outside Europe.
Evropski parlament je v svojih resolucijah v letih 2007, 2008, 2009 in pred kratkim v resoluciji o potresu na Haitiju, sprejeti 10. februarja 2010 ( P7_TA(2010)0015 ), zahteval čimprejšnjo ustanovitev evropskih enot civilne zaščite, da bi se Evropska unija lahko nemudoma odzvala v primeru naravnih nesreč ali nesreč, ki bi jih zakrivil človek (potresi, cunamiji, požari, gozdni požari, poplave, plazovi, nesreče v industrijskih in jedrskih obratih, teroristični napadi, nesreče na morju, velike pandemije).
In its resolutions of 2007, 2008, 2009 and more recently its resolution on the earthquake in Haiti adopted on 10 February 2010 ( P7_TA(2010)0015 ), Parliament calls for a European civil protection force to be established as soon as possible to give the European Union an immediate response capacity in the event of natural or man-made disasters (earthquakes, tsunamis, fires, forest fires, floods, landslides, industrial and nuclear accidents, terrorist attacks, maritime disasters, major pandemics).
Načrt za ustanovitev evropskih enot civilne zaščite na podlagi poročila Michela Barniera iz leta 2006 ali predloga EU-FAST (European Union First Aid and Support Team) nekaterih držav članic je odraz dejanske potrebe, ki je Evropska komisija ne sme zanemariti.
The proposal to set up a European civil protection force, which was inspired by a report by Michel Barnier in 2006 or by the "EU-FAST" (European Union First Aid and Support Team) proposal put forward by a number of Member States, has been made in response to a real need which should not be overlooked by the Commission.
Samo predhodna organiziranost in skupna uporaba že obstoječih nacionalnih sredstev bosta omogočili oblikovanje evropskih enot civilne zaščite.
A European civil protection force will only be possible by means of preventive organisation and a pooling of existing national resources.
Razpršitev nacionalnih sredstev in včasih omejena povezanost evropskega posredovanja drago staneta tako v obliki učinkovitosti kot v denarju.
The dispersion of national resources and the sometimes limited coherence of European action have a cost both in terms of effectiveness and in financial terms.
Taka odločitev bi okrepila zavest o evropski pripadnosti in prepoznavnost Evropske unije kot prvega ponudnika humanitarne pomoči in razvoja.
The creation of a European civil protection force would foster a sense of belonging to Europe and raise the profile of the European Union, which is the main financial donor in terms of humanitarian aid and development.
Ob pomanjkanju zakonodajnega predloga Evropske komisije o ustanovitvi evropskih enot civilne zaščite ali Svet predvideva okrepljeno sodelovanje na podlagi člena 20 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in oblikovanje pripravljalnih ukrepov za sposobnost hitrega posredovanja EU, da države članice, ki to želijo, lahko že začnejo sodelovanje na tem področju?
In the absence of a legislative proposal from the Commission to set up a European civil protection force, is the Council prepared to consider closer cooperation on the basis of Article 20 of the Treaty on European Union and following the preparatory action concerning an EU rapid response capability, so that Member States who wish to do so can press ahead?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0070/2010
Question for oral answer O-0070/2010
Na podlagi členov 196 (civilna zaščita), 222 (klavzula o solidarnosti) in 214 (humanitarna pomoč) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter glede na pripravljalne ukrepe za sposobnost hitrega posredovanja EU ali bo Evropska komisija predložila zakonodajne predloge za izboljšanje mehanizma civilne zaščite na ravni Skupnosti in ustanovitev evropskih enot civilne zaščite za posredovanje v primerih notranjih in zunanjih kriz?
On the basis of Articles 196 (civil protection), 222 (solidarity clause) and 214 (humanitarian aid) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in view of the preparatory action concerning an EU rapid response capability, does the Commission intend to put forward legislative proposals to improve the Community civil protection mechanism and set up a European civil protection force to respond to crises both at home and abroad?
Če da, kdaj?
If so, when?
Ob pomanjkanju zakonodajnega predloga ali Evropska komisija predvideva okrepljeno sodelovanje na podlagi člena 20 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, da države članice, ki to želijo, lahko začnejo sodelovanje na tem področju?
If it is not putting forward a legislative proposal, is the Commission prepared to consider closer cooperation on the basis of Article 20 of the Treaty on European Union, so that Member States who wish to do so can press ahead?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0071/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0071/10
Zadeva: Zaprtje evropskega zračnega prostora zaradi islandskega oblaka pepela
Subject: Closure of European airspace due to the Icelandic ash cloud
Z zaprtjem velikega dela evropskega zračnega prostora (od 15. do 21. aprila) po izbruhu vulkana Eyjafjallajökull na Islandiji so nastale nevzdržne razmere, zaradi česar sta resne posledice utrpela letalski sektor (potniki, letalske družbe, letališča) in celotno gospodarstvo.
The closure of a large part of European airspace (15 to 21 April 2010) after the eruption of the Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland led to an untenable situation, with severe consequences on the European aviation sector (passengers, air companies, airports) and on the overall economy.
Kako Svet ocenjuje krizno upravljanje in usklajeni evropski pristop ter ustrezne instrumente, ki so bili sprejeti?
How does the Council evaluate the crisis management, the co-ordinated European approach and the measures that were taken?
Ali se ne bi morali evropski ministri za promet in Evropska komisija na prvem kriznem srečanju sestati že v zgodnejši fazi?
Should the first crisis meeting between the European transport ministers and the Commission not have taken place at an earlier stage?
Kakšno je trenutno stanje v zvezi s tremi različnimi zračnimi prostori?
What is the situation right now with regard to the three different flight areas?
Te posebne zračne prostore bi morali uvesti že na samem začetku, ne pa v celoti zapreti evropski zračni prostor.
These specific areas should have been introduced from the beginning instead of completely closing European airspace.
Več milijonov potnikov ni moglo nikamor.
Millions of passengers were stranded.
Kako Svet ocenjuje stanje pravic potnikov, še zlasti vrzeli, s katerimi se soočajo evropski državljani ob uveljavljanju svojih pravic pri neevropskih prevoznikih, za katere ne velja evropska zakonodaja?
What is the Council's view on the passenger rights' situation, and in particular on the gaps in legislation to which European citizens have fallen victim when claiming from non-European air carriers who do not fall within the scope of European legislation?
Letalske družbe se soočajo z najhujšo gospodarsko krizo v zgodovini letalskega prometa.
Air companies are facing the worst economic situation in the history of aviation.
Z zaprtjem evropskega zračnega prostora so utrpele ogromne izgube, njihov finančni položaj pa se bo zaradi tega nedvomno poslabšal.
The shutdown of Europe's airspace has meant enormous losses for those companies and will, no doubt, make their financial situation much worse.
Ali Svet v ta namen predvideva kakršnakoli nadomestila ali druga sredstva?
Does the Council plan to introduce any form of compensation or other measures?
V skladu s kakšnimi konkretnimi merili bi bila ta nadomestila koristna (število potnikov in letov itd.)?
What specific criteria would govern the granting of such compensation (numbers of passengers, flights, etc.)?
Ali se Svet strinja, da bi morala pobuda enotno evropsko nebo (SES) v takšnih posebnih razmerah omogočiti boljše usklajevanje med državami članicami?
Does the Council share the view that, under these particular circumstances, the 'Single European Sky' (SES) should have provided better coordination among the Member States?
Kako nameravajo države članice spoštovati dokaj kratki rok za izvedbo?
How do the Member States intend to keep up with the rather tight schedule of implementation?
Ali ni nujno treba imenovati evropskega koordinatorja za SES?
Is it not a matter of urgency to appoint a European coordinator for the SES?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0072/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0072/10
Slišati je vedno več glasnih kritik zaradi negativne vloge, ki so jo imele bonitetne agencije v sedanji krizi, le malo pa je storjenega, da bi obravnavali in zajezili pretirano vlogo, ki jo imajo pri ocenjevanju ne le tveganosti podjetij, temveč tudi gospodarstev, med drugim tudi naših držav članic.
More and more voices are criticising out loud the negative role played by credit rating agencies in the current crisis, but little is being done to address and curb the excessive role they play not only to evaluate the riskiness of businesses, but also of economies, including those of our Member States.
Danes velja splošno prepričanje, da bonitetnim agencijam ni uspelo predvideti krize na trgu hipotekarnih posojil in objektivno oceniti kreditnega tveganja v vrsti finančnih škandalov.
Nowadays it is broadly agreed that credit rating agencies failed to anticipate the subprime crisis and to objectively measure credit risk in a series of financial scandals.
Glede vloge, ki so jo imele pri poslabšanju nedavne dožniške krize, prihaja do resnih obtožb.
The role they played in aggravating the recent sovereign debt crisis is the subject of serious accusations.
Pred kratkim sprejeta uredba, ki sicer obravnava nadzorne vidike, preglednost in vprašanje navzkrižja interesov, se ni dotaknila številnih zahtev, določenih v predpisih EU za uporabo njihovih bonitetnih ocen.
The recently adopted regulation, while tackling supervisory aspects, transparency and the issue of conflicts of interest, did not touch on the numerous requirements laid down in EU laws to use their ratings.
Ali namerava Komisija začeti sektorsko preiskavo, da bi med drugimi vidiki obravnavala tudi vprašanje pristojbin?
Does the Commission intend to open a sectoral inquiry to address, among other aspects, the issue of fees?
Ali Komisija razmišlja o ustanovitvi javne evropske bonitetne agencije, ki ne bi samo tekmovala z obstoječimi, temveč tudi odpravila pomanjkljivosti v njihovih poslovnih modelih?
Is the Commission considering the creation of a European Public Credit Rating Agency, not only to compete with existing ones but also to overcome the shortcomings in their business models?
Ali Komisija razmišlja o možnosti, da bi lahko bili obstoječi javni nacionalni organi, ki izdajajo bonitetne ocene, pristojni za ocenjevanje ekonomskega položaja držav članic?
Has the Commission considered the possibility that existing national public bodies issuing ratings could be entitled to rate the economic situation of Member States?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0073/10
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0073/10
Zadeva: Stališče EU za vrhunsko srečanje skupine G20 v Torontu
Subject: The EU position in relation to the G20 Toronto Summit
Naslednje vrhunsko srečanje skupine G20 bo 26. in 27. junija v Torontu v Kanadi.
The next Summit of the G20 will take place on 26-27 June in Toronto, Canada.
Poudarek srečanja bo na „okrevanju in novih začetkih“, v središču bo okrevanje po svetovni gospodarski in finančni krizi ter izpolnjevanje zavez s prejšnjih vrhunskih srečanj skupine G20, hkrati pa si bodo sodelujoči prizadevali postaviti temelje za trajnostno in uravnoteženo rast.
The Summit will concentrate on ‘Recovery and New Beginnings’, and will focus on recovery from the global economic and financial crisis and the implementation of commitments from previous G20 summits, while laying the foundation for sustainable and balanced growth.
Predsednik Evropske komisije José Manuel Barroso je 15. decembra 2009 v Parlamentu dejal, da je svetovni davek na finančne transakcije zelo dobra zamisel, zlasti glede na inovativno financiranje politik na področju podnebnih sprememb.
Commission President Barroso stated in Parliament on 15 December 2009 that a global financial tax is a ‘very good idea’, particularly with regard to innovative financing of climate change policies.
Prav tako je obvestil Parlament, da je Komisija dejavna na tem področju in da namerava v ustreznem času podati predloge.
He also informed Parliament that the Commission was working in this area ‘in order to put forward proposals at an appropriate time’.
Evropski parlament je že pozval Komisijo in Svet, naj ocenita, v kolikšnem obsegu bi lahko davek na finančne transakcije uporabili tudi kot inovativen finančni mehanizem, s katerim bi v državah v razvoju podprli prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam in ublažitev njihovih posledic, ter za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja ( P7_TA(2010)0056 ).
The European Parliament already called on the Commission and the Council to assess the extent to which a Tax on Financial Transactions could also be used as an innovative financial mechanism to provide support for adaptation to, and mitigation of, climate change for developing countries, as well as for financing development cooperation ( P7_TA(2010)0056 ).
Ali lahko Evropska komisija glede na povedano in glede na to, da je lahko vrhunsko srečanje skupine G20 ena najprimernejših priložnosti, odgovori na ta vprašanja:
Within this context, and bearing in mind that the G20 Summit may offer one of the most appropriate opportunities, can the Commission indicate:
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0074/2010
Question for oral answer O-0074/2010
v imenu Odbora za proračun Zadeva: Pregled večletnega finančnega okvira 2007-2013
on behalf of the Committee on Budgets Subject: Review of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2007-2013
Z Lizbonsko pogodbo je Unija dobila nove prednostne naloge, med drugim na področju zunanjega delovanja, športa, vesolja, podnebnih sprememb, energije, turizma in civilne zaščite.
The Lisbon Treaty has given the Union new priorities, including in the fields of external action, sport, space, climate change, energy, tourism and civil protection.
Člen 311 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije predvideva, da Unija zagotovi potrebna sredstva za doseganje svojih ciljev in izvajanje svojih politik.
Article 311 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) requires the Union to provide itself with the means necessary to attain its objectives and carry through its policies.
Komisija je organizirala široko javno posvetovanje o financah EU v luči sklepov Evropskega sveta 15. in 16. decembra 2005, ki jo je pozval, naj opravi celovit in obsežen pregled vseh vidikov odhodkov in virov EU.
The Commission has carried out a substantial public consultation on the EU’s finances in the light of the conclusions of the European Council of 15-16 December 2005, which invited the Commission to undertake a full and wide-ranging review of all aspects of EU expenditure and resources.
V zadnjih štirih letih trenutnega večletnega finančnega okvira je bilo letne proračune mogoče sprejeti samo z uporabo obstoječih razlik do zgornje meje ali z uporabo instrumentov, predvidenih v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu za financiranje prednostnih nalog EU, kot so na primer Galileo, instrument za hrano in evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva.
Over the last four years of the current MFF, the annual budgets could only be agreed either through using up the existing margins or through recourse to the instruments foreseen by the IIA to finance EU priorities such as Galileo, the food facility or the European Recovery Plan.
Razlike do zgornje meje so v vseh razdelkih večletnega finančnega okvira zelo majhne, in tako bo ostalo tudi v letih 2011–2013.
The margins under all ceilings of the current MFF are now very tight, and will remain so during the years 2011-2013.
Razlika v razdelku 2 (kmetijstvo) v prihodnjih letih skoraj ne bo več dopuščala manevrskega prostora, razliki v razdelkih 1a in 4 sploh ne omogočata več odzivanja na nepredvidene potrebe, razliki v razdelkih 3b in 5 pa sta prav tako čedalje manjši.
The margin in Heading 2 (Agriculture) leaves almost no room for manoeuvre in the coming years, the remaining margins under Headings 1a and 4 offer no space at all to respond to unforeseen needs, and the margins of Heading 3b and 5 are shrinking as well.
Večletni finančni okvir je treba torej pregledati, da se zagotovijo dodatna sredstva, potrebna za uresničevanje prednostnih nalog, povezanih s politikami iz Lizbonske pogodbe, pa tudi za druge pobude, da bo EU lahko izpolnila svoje zaveze in pričakovanja državljanov.
The MFF should therefore be revised to provide the extra resources necessary to deliver the Lisbon-Treaty-related policy priorities, as well as other initiatives allowing the EU to meet its commitments and its citizens’ expectations.
Ker potreba po pregledu neposredno izhaja iz uvedbe Lizbonske pogodbe, bi bilo treba nanjo odgovoriti v okviru paketa ukrepov za prilagoditev obstoječih proračunskih struktur zahtevam Lizbonske pogodbe.
Since the need for a revision is directly linked to the introduction of the Lisbon Treaty, it should be dealt with as part of the package of measures needed to align existing budgetary structures with the requirements of the Lisbon Treaty.
Lizbonski pregled mora zajemati tudi tehnične in politične prilagoditve obstoječega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma in večletnega finančnega okvira na podlagi poročila o delovanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma in revizije nekaterih obstoječih proračunov za večletne programe, dogovorjenih do leta 2013 .
The Lisbon review has to include technical and political adjustment of the existing IIA and MFF based on the report on the functioning of the IIA and the revision of certain existing budgetary envelopes of the multiannual programmes agreed until 2013.
Člen 312 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije navaja, da Svet sprejme uredbo o večletnem finančnem okviru.
Article 312 TFEU states that the Council shall adopt a regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework.
Ta naj bi določbe obstoječega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini uskladila z zahtevami Pogodbe.
This regulation should align the provisions of the current Interinstitutional Agreement on Budgetary Discipline (‘current IIA’) with the requirements of the Treaty.
Ali se Svet strinja, da je treba pregledati obstoječi finančni okvir, da se uresniči sklepe Evropskega sveta z dne 15. in 16. decembra 2005 in okvir uskladi z zahtevami Lizbonske pogodbe?
Does the Council agree on the need for a revision of the current financial framework to comply with the conclusions of the European Council of 15-16 December 2005 and to bring it into line with the requirements of the Lisbon Treaty?
Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti finančna sredstva za pobude iz strategije Evropa 2020, pa tudi za različne pobude in politične zaveze, ki jih je sprejel za obdobje trenutnega in prihodnjega finančnega okvira?
How does the Council plan to provide financing for the initiatives outlined in the Europe 2020 strategy, as well as the various initiatives and political commitments it has taken during the current and next MFF?
Ali se Svet strinja, da je treba pri omenjenem pregledu dosledno in smiselno spoštovati določbe iz člena 312(5) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, pri čemer se morajo o spremembah zgornjih meja večletnega finančnega okvira vse institucije sporazumeti v strukturiranem političnem dialogu s Parlamentom, v katerem bodo želje slednjega v celoti upoštevane?
Does the Council agree that such a revision should respect the spirit and the letter of the provision laid down in article 312.5 TFEU, whereby decisions to amend the multiannual financial framework ceilings are agreed jointly between the institutions in the context of a structured political dialogue with Parliament which fully takes into account Parliament desiderata?
UL C 139, 14.6.2006, str.
OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0075/2010
Question for oral answer O-0075/2010
Z Lizbonsko pogodbo je Unija dobila nove prednostne naloge, med drugim na področju zunanjega delovanja, športa, vesolja, podnebnih sprememb, energije, turizma in civilne zaščite.
The Lisbon Treaty gives the Union new priorities, including in the fields of external action, sport, space, climate change, energy, tourism and civil protection.