natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Odločitev Francije, da s svojega ozemlja izžene Rome, ki so državljani EU (iz Romunije in Bolgarije) je spodbudila takojšen odziv Evropskega parlamenta, ki v svoji resoluciji ( P7_TA(2010)0312 ) z dne 9. septembra 2010 „izraža globoko zaskrbljenost zaradi ukrepov, ki [...] omogočajo njihov izgon“ in zato „poziva [francoske] oblasti, naj nemudoma prekinejo vse izgone Romov, obenem pa poziva Komisijo, Svet in države članice, naj posredujejo z enako zahtevo“.
The decision by France to expel from its territory Roma EU citizens from Romania and Bulgaria has prompted an immediate response by the European Parliament which, in its resolution ( P7_TA(2010)0312 ) of 9 September 2010, ‘expresses its deep concern at the measures ... providing for their expulsion’ and accordingly urges (the French) authorities immediately to suspend all expulsions of Roma, at the same time calling on the Commission, the Council and the Member States to intervene with the same request’.
Komisarka za pravosodje, temeljne pravice in državljanstvo Viviane Reding je v imenu Komisije podala izjavo, v kateri so tudi naslednje ugotovitve: „Za diskriminacijo na podlagi etničnega porekla ali rase v Evropi ni prostora.
Speaking on behalf of the Commission, Viviane Reding, Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, issued a statement which included the following observations: ‘Discrimination on the basis of ethnic origin or race has no place in Europe.
Nacionalni organi, ki pri izvajanju zakonodaje EU diskriminirajo etnične skupine, kršijo tudi Listino EU o temeljnih pravicah, ki so jo podpisale vse države članice, vključno s Francijo.“
National authorities who discriminate against ethnic groups in the application of EU law are also violating the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which all Member States, including France, have signed up to’.
Edina institucija EU, ki še ni podala svojega stališča, je Svet, kar pri evropskih narodih sproža resne dvome glede varstva človekovih in temeljnih pravic v EU.
The only EU institution which has not yet made its position known is the Council, giving rise to serious doubts among the peoples of Europe regarding the protection of human and fundamental rights in the EU.
Kakšno mnenje ima Svet o tem vprašanju?
What view does the Council take of this particular issue?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000031/2011
Question for oral answer O-000031/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Spoštovanje nacionalnih mehanizmov za plače in določanje pokojnin
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Respect of national wage and retirement-setting mechanisms
Decembra lani sta Komisija in Mednarodni denarni sklad z irsko vlado sklenila memorandum o soglasju, ki uvaja posebne obveznosti glede politike za dostopanje do posojil iz evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo oziroma evropskega instrumenta za finančno stabilnost na osnovi trimesečenega cikla.
In December last year, the Commission, in association with the IMF, concluded a Memorandum of Understanding with the Irish Government applying specific policy obligations for access to loans from the European Financial Stability Mechanism/European Financial Stability Facility on a rolling three-month basis.
Med te obveznosti sodita tudi
Amongst those obligations are:
1. zmanjšanje zakonsko zagotovljene minimalne plače in
1. the reduction of the legal minimum wage, and
2. revizija veljavnega sistema kolektivnih pogodb o plačah na Irskem, ki ščiti najnižje plačane delavce pred izkoriščanjem.
2. a review of the established system of collective pay agreements in Ireland which protects the low-paid from exploitation.
Poleg tega je ta pristop v letnem pregledu rasti, ki ga je Komisija sprejela 12. januarja, postal splošno pravilo.
Moreover in the Annual Growth Survey (AGS), adopted by the Commission on 12 January, this approach becomes the general rule.
Glede na člen 152 PDEU, ki določa spoštovanje avtonomije socialnih partnerjev, in člen 153(5) PDEU, ki izrecno izključuje ukrepanje EU na področju plač, katera pravna podlaga v ustanovnih pogodbah daje Komisiji pooblastila, da na tak način posega v nacionalne mehanizme glede plač in določanje pokojnin?
Given the provision of Article 152 of TFEU which respects the autonomy of the social partners, and Article 153(5) of the TFEU which expressly excludes EU action in the field of pay, what legal base in the Treaties authorises the Commission to interfere in national wage and retirement-setting mechanisms in this manner?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000032/2011
Question for oral answer O-000032/2011
V zvezi s tem je bilo dokazano, da so hematopoetske (krvne) izvorne celice zelo učinkovite pri zdravljenju številnih bolezni, ki povzročajo invalidnost, ter v številnih kliničnih poskusih, ki trenutno potekajo.
In this context, hematopoietic (blood) stem cells have been proved to be very effective in treating several disabling diseases, and a large number of clinical trials are currently in progress.
Za razliko od pridobivanja drugih izvornih celic je pridobivanje iz krvi popkovine neboleče za mater in otroka, je pa bogat vir mladih nespremenjenih izvornih celic.
The collection of umbilical cord blood stem cells, unlike other stem cells, is painless for mother and child and also offers an important source of young, undifferentiated stem cells.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000033/2011
Question for oral answer O-000033/2011
Zadeva: Objava javnega Evropskega rokovnika za mlade - kršitev načela svobode misli, vesti in vere
Subject: Publication of the official European Union diary for young people - violation of the principle of freedom of thought, conscience and religion
Komisija je nedavno v trimilijonski nakladi objavila Evropski rokovnik , v katerem je 51 strani namenjenih Evropski uniji.
The Commission recently produced over three million copies of the Europa Diary , which includes 51 pages of information on the European Union.
Rokovniki so bili že razdeljeni v več kot 21 tisoč šolah kot darilo Komisije dijakom.
This diary has already been distributed to over 21 000 schools, to be presented to the students as a gift from the Commission.
Zanje je bilo porabljenih približno 5 milijonov EUR.
Some EUR 5 million was spent on producing the diary.
Niso pa označeni krščanski prazniki, niti Božič, čeprav je krščanstvo večinska vera Evropejcev.
No Christian festivals are included, however; not even Christmas Day, despite the fact that Christianity is the religion of most European citizens.
Prav zaradi nenehnih poročil črne kronike o preganjanju, getoizaciji in atentatih proti kristjanom po svetu ima Evropska unija odgovornost, da posveti večjo pozornost spoštovanju svobode vere svojih državljanov in priznavanju njihovih praznikov, saj je to temeljno načelo vsakega demokratičnega sistema.
Particularly in view of the continual stream of reports of incidents of persecution, ghettoisation and violence against Christians throughout the world, the European Union has a responsibility to pay closer attention to ensuring its citizens' religious freedom is upheld and their respective religious festivals are acknowledged, which is a basic principle of any democratic system.
Poleg tega je služba Komisije za stike z javnostmi sporočila, da razdeljenih izvodov ne namerava umakniti.
Moreover, on 12 January 2011 the Commission's press service announced that it had no intention of withdrawing copies of the diary which had already been distributed.
Ob upoštevanju povedanega, ali lahko Komisija obrazloži:
In view of the foregoing,
4. ali namerava v prihodnje preveriti vsebino tovrstnih rokovnikov in prevzeti odgovornost za to, da bodo v skladu z vrednotami in temeljnimi pravicami Evropske unije?
Does the Commission intend to check the content of such diaries in future and to take responsibility for ensuring that they are consistent with the European Union's values and fundamental rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000034/2011
Question for oral answer O-000034/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Vizumska obveznost v Kanadi za češke, romunske in bolgarske državljane
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Canadian visa requirement for Czech, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens
Trenutno stanje v zvezi z vizumsko obveznostjo v Kanadi za češke, romunske in bolgarske državljane spodkopava skupno vizumsko politiko EU, ki temelji na vzajemnosti in ki bi naj spodbujala prost pretok za vse državljane EU.
The current state of affairs concerning the Canadian visa requirement for Czech, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens is undermining the EU’s common visa policy, which is based on reciprocity and is meant to promote freedom of movement for all EU citizens.
Zato pozivamo Komisijo, naj si bolj prizadeva za ponovno vzpostavitev in zagotovitev vzajemnosti na področju vizumov.
We therefore urge the Commission to step up its involvement with the aim of restoring and securing visa reciprocity.
Komisija je pristojna, da na podlagi svoje odgovornosti za skupno vizumsko politiko EU in svojih zmožnosti sprejme ukrepe.
The Commission has a mandate by virtue of its responsibility for the EU’s common visa policy and its ability to take effective action.
Kako Komisija ocenjuje dosedanjo učinkovitost pristopa Unije k temu vprašanju?
How does the Commission assess the effectiveness of the EU's approach to the issue thus far?
Kakšno stališče zavzema Komisija do poskusov, s katerimi želi Kanada odpravo vizumske obveznosti podrediti različnim pogojem, kot so reforma kanadskega azilnega sistema ali zmanjšanje števila prosilcev za azil ali politike za družbeno vključevanje manjšin v posameznih državah članicah EU?
What is the Commission's position on Canada's efforts to make the lifting of the visa requirement contingent on a number of conditions, such as the reform of the Canadian asylum system, a decrease in the number of asylum seekers, or minority integration policies in an EU Member State?
Ali v zvezi s tem po mnenju Komisije zadostuje zgolj obljuba Kanade, da bo izvedla revizijo svoje azilne politike?
In that connection, does the Commission regard Canada’s promise merely to carry out a review of its asylum policy as sufficient?
Ali namerava Komisija okrepiti pritisk na Kanado, naj sprejme praktične ukrepe za odpravo vizumskih obveznosti?
Does the Commission intend to increase the pressure on Canada to take practical steps to lift the visa requirement?
Če to Komisija namerava, kakšna sredstva bo uporabila za uresničitev tega cilja, zlasti v okviru pričakovanih rezultatov kanadske misije za ugotavljanje dejstev na Češkem?
If so, what means will the Commission employ to achieve this goal, not least in the context of the expected results of the Canadian fact-finding mission to the Czech Republic?
S katerimi konkretnimi ukrepi bo Komisija uveljavila izjave vrhunskega srečanja EU-Kanada iz leta 2010, ki vključuje zavezo za rešitev odprtih vprašanj, ki preprečujejo potovanje brez vizumov za vse državljane EU?
What concrete steps will the Commission take to implement the EU-Canada Summit Statement of 2010 which includes a commitment to resolve the remaining issues blocking visa-free travel for all EU citizens?
Kako Komisija rešuje vprašanje dejavnikov za spodbujanje izseljevanja kot v primeru do romskih manjšin v EU?
What is the Commission doing to address push factors, such as the treatment of Roma minorities in the European Union?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000035/2011
Question for oral answer O-000035/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Revizija okvira za strokovne skupine Komisije, uravnoteženo zastopanost in preglednost
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Revision of the framework for Commission expert groups and balanced representation and transparency
Nedavno je Komisija revidirala svoj okvir za upravljanje strokovnih skupin Komisije (SEC(2010)1360) in (C(2010)7649).
The Commission recently revised its framework governing the Commission’s expert groups (SEC(2010)1360 and C(2010)7649).
Trenutno ima veliko število strokovnih skupin pristransko sestavo v korist zasebnega sektorja in zlasti največjih podjetij.
Currently a large number of expert groups have a biased composition in favour of the private sector, and especially the largest companies.
V spremenjeno različico okvira ni bil vključen noben ukrep za večjo uravnoteženost strokovnih skupin, ki bi predvideval okrepitev udeležbe malih in srednjih podjetij ali civilne družbe v strokovnih skupinah.
In the revised version of the framework, no measures are taken to strive for more balanced expert groups by taking measures to enhance SME or civil society participation in expert groups.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da to pomeni, da uravnoteženo svetovanje ni obvezno?
Does the Commission agree that this suggests that getting balanced advice is not obligatory?
Če se ne strinja, ali lahko to pojasni?
If not, please explain?
Pri izbiri zunanjih strokovnjakov Komisija navede, če so strokovnjaki predstavniki interesa posebne interesne skupine ali naj bi bili neodvisni od vseh sodelujočih interesnih skupin.
For the selection of external experts, the Commission shall mention if experts are representative of a particular stakeholder’s interest or if they are supposed to be independent from any stakeholder involved.
Katere konkretne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti za to zadnjo kategorijo, da bi preprečila kakršno koli navzkrižje interesov?
For this last category, what specific action is the Commission planning to take to avoid any kind of conflict of interests?
Zlasti, ali Komisija namerava uporabljati smernice GD Sanco?
In particular, does the Commission intend to apply DG Sanco’s guidelines?
Preglednost je temeljno načelo za institucije pri postopku sprejemanja odločitev EU v skladu s členoma 1 in 11 PEU, poleg člena 15 PDEU, ki določa pravico javnosti do dostopa do dokumentov.
Transparency is a core principle for the institutions in EU decision-making, according to Article 1 TEU and Article 11 TEU along with Article 15 TFEU, giving the public the right of access to documents.
Ali namerava Komisija ob upoštevanju navedenega oblikovati uporabniku prijazno spletno stran, na kateri bodo objavljeni vsi javni razpisi, vse obstoječe strokovne skupine s priloženim popolnim pregledom vseh članov, ter vsi zapisniki, ki so na voljo javnosti?
Is the Commission therefore intending to establish a user-friendly website on which all public calls for applications will be published, all existing expert groups with their full membership enclosed, and all minutes made available to the public?
Če namerava to storiti, na kakšen način in v kakšnem časovnem okviru?
If so, how and when?
Če tega ne namerava, ali lahko pojasni razloge ?
If not, please explain?
Zakaj se Komisija pred sprejetjem svojih končnih odločitev o spremembi okvira ni posvetovala z EP, saj je preglednost postala vprašanje skupnega pomena tako za Komisijo kakor za EP?
Why has the Commission not consulted the EP before taking final decisions on the revision of the framework, as transparency has become an issue of common concern to both the Commission and the EP?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000036/2011
Question for oral answer O-000036/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Zagotavljanje evropskih zalog elementov redkih zemelj
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Securing Europe's supply of rare earth elements
Elementi redkih zemelj so bistvenega pomena za stotine naprednih tehnoloških aplikacij in ključ do razvoja zelenih tehnologij (kot so turbine na vetrni pogon, hibridna vozila itd.), zato so bistveni za konkurenčnost evropske industrije.
Rare earth elements (REE) are critical to hundreds of high-tech applications and key to the development of green technologies (such as wind-powered turbines, hybrid vehicles, etc.), and thus essential to the competitiveness of European industry.
Čeprav je v zemeljski skorji elementov redke zemlje precej, jih ni enostavno gospodarsko izkoriščati.
Although REE are rather abundant in the earth’s crust, their economic exploitation is not easy.
Industrija EU je trenutno v celoti odvisna od uvoza elementov redkih zemelj s Kitajske, ki ima dejansko monopol nad njimi, saj nadzoruje 97 % njihove svetovne proizvodnje.
EU industry currently depends totally on REE imports from China, which holds a virtual monopoly by controlling 97 % of the world production.
Kitajska ima 36 % znanih svetovnih gospodarskih zalog elementov redkih zemelj (ter po ocenah 59 % skupnih zalog), hkrati pa sklepa dvostranske sporazume za zagotavljanje znanih rezerv po svetu.
China has 36 % of the world’s known economic REE reserves (and an estimated 59 % of the total reserves) and at the same time pursues bilateral agreements for securing known reserves worldwide.
Kitajska združuje vertikalno organizacijo svoje industrije teh elementov z znatnimi napori na področju raziskav in razvoja ter je že dosegla občutno konkurenčno prednost pri rafiniranju njihove rude ter pri proizvodnji zlitin in končnih proizvodov, industriji v EU pa primanjkuje tako dostopa do surovih elementov redke zemlje kot tudi industrijskega in znanstvenega znanja za njihovo predelavo.
China combines a vertical organisation of its REE industry with strong research and development and has already achieved a significant competitive advantage in refining REE ores and producing alloys and end products, while EU industry lacks both access to REE raw materials and the industrial and scientific know-how for processing them.
Poleg tega je Kitajska že napovedala občutne omejitve pri izvažanju teh elementov, ob tem pa svetovno povpraševanje po njih narašča.
Furthermore, while global demand for REE is rising, China has already announced significant export restrictions.
Ali ima EU celostno strategijo za elemente redkih zemelj?
Does the EU have a comprehensive strategy on REE?
Ali je Komisija ocenila, koliko je pomembna dobava elementov redkih zemelj za evropsko industrijo?
Has the Commission made an assessment of the criticality of REE supply for European industry?
Ocenjuje se, da bo že v letu 2014 primanjkljaj svetovne proizvodnje elementov redkih zemelj znašal 40.000 ton, kar bi lahko zlasti industriji EU povzročilo resne težave in strmo naraščanje cen.
It is estimated that already in 2014 there will be a global production shortfall of 40 000 tonnes of REE, which may lead to significant problems for EU industry in particular, including a sharp rise in prices.
Katere kratkoročne ukrepe, ki bi bili skladni s stebri iz evropske pobude za surovine, predlaga Komisija v zvezi s temi elementi?
What possible short-term measures is the Commission proposing to take regarding REE, in accordance with the pillars set out in the European Raw Materials Initiative (RMI)?
Kako namerava Komisija pristopiti k občutljivemu vprašanju elementov redkih zemelj v rednih (dvostranskih) pogovorih s Kitajsko?
How does the Commission intend to deal with the sensitive REE issue in its regular dialogue with China?
Kakšne so razmere znotraj Svetovne trgovinske organizacije?
What is the state of play within the WTO?
Katere ukrepe je ob sodelovanju s svojimi partnerji sprejela Komisija, da bi zagotovila alternativne vire elementov redkih zemelj in zmanjšala tveganje pri dobavi za evropsko industrijo?
What steps has the EC taken, along with its partners, to establish alternative sources of REE and minimise the supply risk to European industry?
Ali Komisija razmišlja o možnosti, da bi vzpostavila evropsko shemo shranjevanja zalog teh materialov (kot so to že storile ZDA, Japonska in Koreja), da bi zagotovila ustrezno dobavo elementov redkih zemelj in stabilnost njihove cene, saj se ti elementi ne uporabljajo zgolj za visokotehnološke naprave in zelene tehnologije, ampak tudi za pomembne medicinske in obrambne namene?
Given that REE are necessary not only for high-tech appliances and green technologies but also for critical medical and defence applications, is the Commission considering the possibility of setting up a European stockpiling scheme for these materials (following similar moves by the US, Japan and Korea) in order to ensure adequate REE supply and price stability?
Kakšni so obeti za recikliranje teh elementov v EU?
What are the prospects for REE recycling in the EU?
Ali bo zamenjava elementov redkih zemelj pomemben del novega okvirnega programa za raziskave?
Will REE substitution play an important role in the next research FP?
Kako namerava Komisija spodbujati podjetja EU , ki se ukvarjajo z elementi redkih zemelj, da se preusmerijo in začnejo izkoriščati druge vire v EU, in sicer na Grenlandiji ali v državah v razvoju?
How does the Commission plan to encourage EU REE companies to redevelop and exploit other sources within the EU, in Greenland or in the developing countries?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000037/2011
Question for oral answer O-000037/2011
Parlament je 20. januarja letos z veliko večino sprejel skupno resolucijo o položaju kristjanov v zvezi s svobodo veroizpovedi.
On 20 January 2011 Parliament, acting by an overwhelming majority, adopted a joint resolution on the situation of Christians in the context of freedom of religion.
Besedilo resolucije vsebuje predloge Svetu in Komisiji glede zunanje politike Unije: Parlament želi druge institucije Skupnosti uradno in slovesno opomniti, da mora zunanje ukrepanje Unije temeljiti na načelu zaščite človekovih pravic, in sicer v skladu z ustanovnimi pogodbami in jasnimi določbami, ki jih vsebujejo številni sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu in sodelovanju s tretjimi državami.
The text sets out guidelines for the Council and Commission as regards EU foreign policy; Parliament’s aim in adopting the resolution was to send a formal and solemn message to the other Community institutions that EU external action has to be based on the principle of protection of human rights, in accordance with the Treaties and with specific provisions of the numerous cooperation and economic partnership agreements with non-member countries.
Glede na nedavno zavrnitev besedila sprašujemo Svet, kdaj bo predvidoma na dnevnem redu razprava o novem besedilu, ki bo bolj usklajeno s predlogi Parlamenta?
In view of the recent rejection of that text, when is discussion likely to take place on a new text more consistent with Parliament’s guidelines.
Kako konkretno namerava Svet izvajati politične instrumente za varnost in zaščito krščanskih skupnosti v državah, kjer so žrtev preganjanja in diskriminacije?
Specifically, how will the Council employ political means of providing security and protection to Christian communities, wherever they might be suffering persecution and discrimination?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000038/2011
Question for oral answer O-000038/2011
v imenu Odbora za ribištvo Zadeva: Pogajanja za obnovo Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Mavretanijo
on behalf of the Committee on Fisheries Subject: Negotiations regarding the renewal of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Mauritania
Sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med EU in Mavretanijo je najpomembnejši tovrstni sporazum z afriškimi državami.
The EU-Mauritania Fisheries Partnership Agreement (FPA) is the most important of the EU's FPAs with African countries.
Komisija namerava začeti pogajanja za obnovitev obstoječega Protokola med Evropsko unijo in Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega prispevka, ki jih zagotavlja.
The Commission is planning to launch negotiations on the renewal of the current Protocol between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided in it.
Kakšna je končna ocena Komisije o veljavnem Protokolu v zvezi z ribolovnimi možnostmi za floto EU in podporo večletnega sektorskega programa v Mavretaniji, vključno z ustrezno uporabo sredstev EU?
What is the Commission's complete evaluation of the Protocol currently in force, regarding both fishing opportunities for the EU fleet and support for the multiannual sectoral programme for Mauritania, including the appropriate use of EU funds?