natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
7. septembra 2010 je Evropski parlament sprejel resolucijo o evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (EGP) – Švici: ovire pri popolnem izvajanju notranjega trga ( P7_TA(2010)0300 ).
On 7 September 2010, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on EEA-Switzerland: Obstacles with regard to the full implementation of the internal market ( P7_TA(2010)0300 ).
Komisiji je predložil več zahtev za izboljšanje sodelovanja med EU in Švico na področju notranjega trga.
It made a number of requests to the Commission to improve the cooperation between the EU and Switzerland in internal market matters.
Katere ukrepe je Komisija sprejela, da bi rešila težave v zvezi s podpornimi ukrepi, ki so povzročala težave MSP iz EU pri zagotavljanju storitev v Švici, in da bi prepričala švicarske oblasti, da razveljavijo uredbe, ki obvezujejo tuja podjetja, ki zagotavljajo čezmejne storitve, da zagotovijo jamstvo o finančni poštenosti?
What actions have been undertaken by the Commission to solve the problems regarding the supporting measures which make it difficult for SMEs from the EU to provide services in Switzerland and to convince the Swiss authorities to repeal regulations which oblige foreign enterprises providing cross-border services to deposit a guarantee of financial probity?
Katere ukrepe je Komisija sprejela, da bi nadaljevala svoja načrtovana pogajanja v zvezi s prometnimi razmerami na letališču Zurich-Kloten?
What measures has the Commission taken to follow up its planned negotiations regarding the transport situation at Zurich-Kloten Airport?
Kako namerava Komisija doseči sporazum s švicarskimi organi o izvedbi direktive 2005/36/ES, ki je zelo občutljiva zadeva, zlasti v zvezi s strokovnimi kvalifikacijami, ki so jih izdale vzhodne evropske države članice?
How does the Commission intend to reach an agreement with the Swiss authorities on the implementation of Directive 2005/36/EC, which is a highly sensitive issue, in particular as regards certain professional qualifications issued by Eastern European Member States?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen pri oblikovanju predpisov o notranjem trgu, primernejših za zagotavljanje preglednejšega in predvidljivejšega okolja gospodarskim subjektom na obeh straneh?
What progress has been made in developing internal market rules more apt to provide economic operators from both sides with a more transparent and predictable environment?
Kakšen napredek je bil dosežen pri iskanju horizontalnih rešitev za nekatere institucionalne težave, npr. razdrobljenost, pomanjkanje preglednosti v sistemu sprejemanja odločitev, nezadostna komunikacija med skupnimi odbori in neučinkovita poravnava sporov?
What progress has been made in finding horizontal solutions to certain institutional problems, e.g. fragmentation, lack of transparency in the decision-making system, insufficient communication between the Joint Committees and ineffective dispute settlement?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000129/2011
Question for oral answer O-000129/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Evropski nalog za prijetje
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: European Arrest Warrant
Komisija je pred kratkim objavila poročilo o izvrševanju evropskega naloga za prijetje (KOM(2011)0175), v katerem je izpostavila vrsto ponavljajočih se neuspehov v zvezi z izvrševanjem evropskega naloga za prijetje.
The Commission has recently issued its implementation report on the European Arrest Warrant (COM(2011)0175), in which it highlighted a series of persisting failures concerning the application of the EAW.
Gre denimo za vprašanje uporabe evropskega naloga za prijetje za lažja kazniva dejanja, ne da bi se ustrezno presodilo, ali je predaja sorazmerna, ter ne glede na človeške in finančne stroške (ki so ocenjeni na 25.000 EUR za vsak postopek predaje), in za vprašanje nesprejemljivih pogojev bivanja v času odvzema prostosti, ki lahko pomenijo ponižujoče ali nečloveško ravnanje in torej predstavljajo kršitev Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah (člen 3) in Evropske listine o temeljnih pravicah (člen 4) ter resno spodkopavajo zaupanje v ustrezno ravnanje z zaporniki, na katerem temelji evropski nalog za prijetje.
For instance, the issue of using the EAW for minor offences without proper consideration of whether surrender is proportionate, notwithstanding the human and financial costs involved (estimated at EUR 25 000 per surrender procedure), and the issue of unacceptable detention conditions which may amount to degrading or inhuman treatment and thus constitute a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 3) and the European Charter of Fundamental rights (Article 4) and seriously undermine the trust in adequate treatment of prisoners upon which the European Arrest Warrant is based.
– Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi sorazmernost morala biti ključno merilo za vsak evropski nalog za prijetje, ki se izda, ter da lahko država izvršiteljica zavrne izvršitev evropskega naloga za prijetje, če le-ta ne prestane uspešno testa sorazmernosti, denimo v primerih lahkih kaznivih dejanj, ki so kot taka opredeljena v nacionalnem pravu?
– Does the Commission agree that proportionality should be a key consideration for every issued EAW and that the executing state may refuse to execute an EAW where it demonstrates that the proportionality test has not been met, for instance in the case of very minor offences as defined by national law?
Ali namerava Komisija vzporedno z navodili Sveta pojasniti in spodbuditi sestavo smernic za preverjanje sorazmernosti evropskega naloga za prijetje?
Does the Commission intend to clarify and promote guidelines on the proportionality check of an EAW, in parallel with the Council Handbook?
– Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da imajo osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, dejansko pravico izpodbijati nalog v državi izdajateljici in v državi izvršiteljici, ter da odločitev, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, pomeni tudi odstranitev schengenskega opozorila?
– How is the Commission going to ensure that wanted persons under a European Arrest Warrant are going to have an effective right to challenge a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing state and that a decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant leads to a removal of the Schengen alert?
– Ali se Komisija strinja, da nesprejemljive življenjske razmere v zaporih povzročajo, da ni potrebnega vzajemnega zaupanja v kazenskopravne standarde drugih držav, in ali se strinja, da če se življenjske razmere v zaporih v Evropski uniji ne izboljšajo, imajo sodišča de facto podlago, da ustavijo izvrševanje evropskega naloga za prijetje, da zaščitijo temeljne človekove pravice?
– Does the Commission agree that unacceptable prison conditions make it impossible to have the necessary mutual trust in each other’s criminal justice standards, and does it agree that if prison conditions in the European Union are not improved, courts have a de facto refusal ground to block the execution of an EAW in order to protect a person’s fundamental rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000130/2011
Question for oral answer O-000130/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Humanitarni konvoj ladij v Gazo II
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Humanitarian flotilla to Gaza II
Predstavniki organizacije Flotilja svobode II so 10. maja 2011 obiskali Parlament in se sestali z mnogimi poslanci, da bi jim posredovali informacije o novem konvoju ladij s humanitarno pomočjo, ki naj bi tretji teden v juniju odplul v Gazo.
Representatives from the organisation of the Freedom Flotilla II visited Parliament on 10 May 2011 and met many MEPs to present information on the new aid flotilla which should set sail for Gaza in the third week of June carrying humanitarian aid on board.
Izraelski vojaki so 31. maja 2010 na odprtem morju napadli konvoj šestih ladij, imenovan Flotilja svobode, ki je bil s 750 civilisti in več tonami pomoči na krovu na poti v Gazo.
On the morning of 31 May 2010 a convoy of six ships bound for Gaza, known as the Freedom Flotilla, with more than 750 civilians and tonnes of aid on board, was attacked in the open sea by Israeli soldiers.
Zaradi tega nasilnega dejanja je življenje izgubilo devet ljudi, veliko pa jih je bilo ranjenih.
The result of this act of violence was the death of nine people and the injury of many more.
Izraelsko vojaško vodstvo se glede na nedavno poročanje v tisku pripravlja, da bo zaustavilo vsak morebiten konvoj.
According to recent articles in the press, Israeli military officers are saying that preparations are under way to stop any flotilla.
Namerava Svet zagotoviti, da se tragedija z 31. maja 2010 ne bi ponovila, in kako namerava podpreti zaščito humanitarnih aktivistov?
What measures will the Council take to avoid a repetition of the tragic events of 31 May 2010 and to support protection of the humanitarian activists?
S katerimi ukrepi namerava Svet zagotoviti dosledno spoštovanje mednarodnih standardov za človekove pravice?
What measures will the Council take to ensure that international human rights standards are adhered to?
S katerimi ukrepi namerava Svet odpraviti blokado za humanitarno pomoč Gazi?
What steps is the Council taking with a view to bringing to an end the humanitarian aid blockade of Gaza?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000131/2011
Question for oral answer O-000131/2011
V zadnjih mesecih smo opazili, da je bila iz Rusije v Armenijo in Azerbajdžan dostavljena večja količina orožja.
In recent months we have witnessed the supply of large quantities of arms from Russia to Armenia and Azerbaijan.
To lahko povzroči napetost zlasti v okolici pokrajine Gorski Karabah in na celotnem južnem Kavkazu.
This may provoke increased tension, especially around the Nagorno-Karabakh region and in the whole area of the South Caucasus.
S katerimi ukrepi namerava Evropska unija preprečiti morebitno zaostritev konflikta?
What steps does the European Union intend to take in order to prevent a potential escalation of the conflict?
Ali je Evropska unija napovedala, na kakšen način želi strani v konfliktu odvračati od kršenja sporazuma o premirju iz Biškeka?
Has the EU announced any disincentives vis-à-vis any parties to the conflict that breach the Bishkek ceasefire agreement?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000132/2011
Question for oral answer O-000132/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Politika o ponovnem sprejemu in spremljanje
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Readmission policy and monitoring
Svet je v stockholmskem programu pozval Komisijo, naj predstavi oceno sporazumov EU o ponovnem sprejemu in tekočih pogajanjih.
In the Stockholm Programme, the Council asked the Commission to present an evaluation of EU readmission agreements and ongoing negotiations.
Komisija je 23. februarja 2011 predstavila sporočilo o oceni sporazumov EU o ponovnem sprejemu in o prihodnji strategiji zanje.
On 23 February the Commission presented a Communication on the evaluation of, and future strategy for, EU readmission agreements.
Svet namerava na junijski seji 2011 sprejeti sklepe o tem sporočilu.
Council conclusions on this communication are to be adopted at the Council meeting in June.
Države članice pa ga v obdobju po napadih 11. septembra 2001 niso v celoti spoštovale.
However, this norm has not been fully respected by the EU Member States during the years since the 9/11 attack in 2001.
Kakor je poudarila Komisija, popolni podatki o ponovnem sprejemu niso na voljo in ni mehanizma za spremljanje, kaj se kasneje zgodi z osebami, ki so bile ponovno sprejete.
As the Commission has pointed out, comprehensive data on readmissions is not available and there is no mechanism to monitor what happens to persons after their readmission is completed.
Zdi se, da je treba opraviti splošno revizijo politike EU o ponovnem sprejemu, da bi odpravili njene napake.
It seems that there is a need to review the whole EU readmission policy in order to correct its flaws.
– Ali bo Svet zahteval, da se zbere več statističnih in drugih podatkov, zlasti o obdelavi prošenj za azil ponovno sprejetih oseb, da se vzpostavi koristna podlaga za oceno izvrševanja sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu?
– Will the Council require more statistics and data, especially about the asylum application process of a readmitted person, to be gathered in order to provide a useful basis for assessing the implementation of the readmission agreements?
– Ali bo Svet zagotovil, da bo politika o ponovnem sprejemu pregledna in da bo javnost imela dostop do dvostranskih izvedbenih protokolov?
– Is the Council going to ensure that the readmission policy is transparent and that the public has access to the bilateral implementation protocols?
– Kako se namerava Svet odzvati na druga priporočila Komisije, zlasti o oceni konkretne potrebe po nacionalni klavzuli za tretje države?
– How will the Council react to the other recommendations made by the Commission, especially on evaluating the concrete need for third-country national clauses?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000133/2011
Question for oral answer O-000133/2011
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Subvencije EU za onesnaževanje in netrajnostno ravnanje
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: EU subsidies for polluting and unsustainable practices
Subvencije EU na področju kmetijstva, kohezijske politike, prometa, energije in ribištva imajo lahko nehotene škodljive posledice za okolje.
EU subsidies in the fields of agriculture, cohesion policy, transport, energy and fisheries may have unintended harmful effects on the environment.
Mnogo študij, opravljenih v zadnjih letih, je proučevalo okoljsko škodo, ki jo povzročajo subvencije.
A number of studies have examined environmentally harmful subsidies in recent years.
OECD opredelitev navaja, da "v sicer enakih okoliščinah [okolju škodljiva] subvencija povečuje pridobivanje/porabo naravnega vira in tako zvišuje raven s tem povezanih odpadkov, onesnaževanja in izkoriščanja naravnih virov . "
Based on the OECD definition, ‘ All other things being equal, the [environmentally harmful] subsidy increases the levels of output/use of a natural resource and therefore increases the level of waste, pollution and natural exploitation to those connected .’
Raziskava, ki jo je zahteval Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in je bila objavljena v februarju 2011, je izpostavila negativen vpliv na okolje, ki ga imajo nekatere ključne proračunske postavke v mnogih sektorskih politikah EU.
A study requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and published in February 2011 has highlighted negative impacts on the environment of key budget items in several EU sectoral policies.
Raziskava predlaga, naj institucije EU natančno ocenijo posredne in neposredne vplive sedanjih subvencij EU ter začnejo njihovo reformo.
This study suggests that EU institutions should assess in depth the direct and indirect effects of the current EU subsidy framework and proceed to reform it.
V sklepih, ki jih je sprejel Svet na svojem srečanju 20. decembra 2010, je ponovljen "poziv, ki ga je že pred časom naslovil na Komisijo, naj (ob upoštevanju strategije Evropa 2020) predloži časovni načrt za odpravo subvencij, ki zelo negativno vplivajo na okolje, da bi lahko spremljali napredek in o njem še naprej redno poročali tudi po letu 2011".
The Council conclusions of 20 December 2010 reiterated the Council’s ‘ long-standing invitation to the Commission to present a roadmap for the removal of subsidies that have considerable negative effects on the environment so as to allow the monitoring and further regular reporting on progress from 2011 onwards, taking into account the Europe 2020 Strategy ’.
Komisija je s prenovo ribiške politike in kot del pregleda skupne kmetijske politike sprejela prve ukrepe za postopno odpravo tovrstnih subvencij.
The Commission has taken the first steps in phasing out these kinds of subsidies through the reform of fisheries policy and as part of the CAP health check.
Kljub temu je še vedno treba narediti veliko, da bi dosegli večjo trajnost proračuna EU in izboljšali usklajenost politik EU.
Nevertheless there is still a lot to do to achieve a more sustainable EU budget and to increase the coherence of EU policies.
Poleg tega Komisija ni predložila podrobnega načrta za natančen pregled vsake postavke proračuna EU, s čimer bi bilo mogoče oceniti morebitne negativne vplive na okolje in predlagati prenovo strukture proračuna.
In addition, the Commission did not provide a detailed roadmap to scrutinise each line of the EU budget in order to assess the potential negative impact on the environment, and to propose a reform of the budget structure.
– Na kakšni stopnji je trenutno delo Komisije pri izvajanju celovite analize orodja za reformo okolju škodljivih subvencij iz kritičnih postavk proračuna?
– What is the state of play regarding the Commission’s work in carrying out a full environmentally harmful subsidies reform tool analysis of the critical budget titles?
– Kdaj namerava Komisija predložiti jasne in dobro utemeljene predloge za odstranitev netrajnostnih dejavnikov iz proračuna EU?
– When does the Commission plan to provide clear and well-founded propositions to remove unsustainable elements from the EU budget?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000134/2011
Question for oral answer O-000134/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Postopek izbire novega generalnega direktorja Mednarodnega denarnega sklada
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: The selection process for a new Managing Director at the IMF
Postopek izbire novega generalnega direktorja Mednarodnega denarnega sklada je v teku.
The procedure for selecting a new Managing Director for the IMF is under way.
Obstaja več razlogov, zakaj bi morali znova izbrati kandidata iz EU.
There are several reasons why a candidate from the EU should be selected once again.
Mednarodni denarni sklad je imel od svoje ustanovitve vselej predsednika iz Evrope (Svetovna banka pa nekoga iz ZDA).
Ever since the creation of the IMF, its President has been a European (and the President of the World Bank someone from the US).
To je del nepisanega dogovora, ki odraža dejstvo, da sta EU in ZDA največji plačnici prispevkov za obe instituciji.
This is part of an unwritten agreement that reflects the fact that the biggest financial contributors to both institutions are the EU and the USA.
Reforme, ki so bile uvedene leta 2010, tega niso spremenile.
The reforms introduced in 2010 did not change this.
Pomembno je, da bo nekdanjega generalnega direktorja zamenjal nekdo iz držav članic EU, ker izzivi, ki nastajajo zaradi napetosti na trgih državnega dolga EU, zahtevajo, da vodstvo Mednarodnega denarnega sklada kar najbolje razume takšne razmere.
It is important that the replacement for the former managing director comes from an EU Member State because the challenges posed by the tensions in the EU sovereign debt markets require an IMF with the best possible understanding of the situation at the top.
Želimo si, da bi bil generalni direktor Mednarodnega denarnega sklada zaslužen in sposoben državljan EU.
We want an EU national with merit and capabilities as Managing Director of the IMF.
V teh okoliščinah je zelo pomembno, da vse države članice EU podprejo kandidata EU.
In these circumstances it is very important that all EU Member States back an EU candidate.
Vemo, da je predsednik Barroso podal izjavo v podporo edini kandidatki, ki se je uradno prijavila za to delovno mesto.
We know that President Barroso has made a statement in favour of the only EU candidate to have formally applied for the post.
V EU ni uradnega postopka za takšno imenovanje, vendar bi morala Komisija poskusiti s prizadevanjem v tej smeri.
There is no formal EU procedure for this kind of nomination but the Commission should try to work in this direction.
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da bo naslednji generalni direktor Mednarodnega denarnega sklada državljan EU?
What is the Commission doing to ensure that the next Managing Director of the IMF is an EU national?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000135/2011
Question for oral answer O-000135/2011
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Celovit pristop k podnebju škodljivim antropogenim emisijam, ki niso emisije CO2
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: A comprehensive approach to non-CO2 climate-relevant anthropogenic emissions
V prizadevanjih za blažitev posledic podnebnih sprememb se je evropska podnebna politika doslej osredotočala predvsem na dolgoročno zmanjšanje emisij CO2.
In an effort to mitigate the consequences of climate change, European climate policy has been focused on the long-term reduction of CO2 emissions.
Na drugi strani pa znanstveni podatki kažejo, da se je treba veliko volj posvetiti oblikovanju celovitega pristopa k zmanjšanju podnebju škodljivih antropogenih emisij, ki niso emisije CO2, in sicer fluoriranih ogljikovodikov, črnega ogljika ter plinastih onesnaževal, ki povzročajo nastajanje troposferskega ozona (ozona v nižjih plasteh ozračja).
Scientific data prove that our policy is severely lacking in a comprehensive approach to the reduction of non-CO2 climate-relevant anthropogenic emissions, namely HFCs, black carbon and pollutant gases that lead to the formation of tropospheric (lower atmosphere) ozone.
Podatki kažejo tudi, da moramo v prizadevanjih za boj proti podnebnim spremembam odločno in pravočasno obravnavati onesnaževala, ki niso onesnaževala CO2, ter izkoristiti prednosti obstoječih tehnologij in institucij (kot so Montrealski protokol, dvostranski sporazumi, itd.).
The same data indicate that it is important to complement our efforts against climate change by firmly and timely addressing the non-CO2 pollutants while taking advantage of existing technologies and institutions (such as the Montreal Protocol, bilateral agreements, etc.).
To je za nekatere fluorirane ogljikovodike mogoče doseči po javni ceni od 5 do 10 centov na tono, medtem ko cena ogljika zdaj presega 13 EUR na tono.
This can be done for some HFCs at a public price as low as 5 to 10 cents per tonne, whereas now the carbon price is over EUR 13 per tonne.
Možni so naslednji ukrepi:
Relevant policy options include:
(a) postopno zmanjšanje proizvodnje in uporabe fluoriranih ogljikovodikov, ki lahko vplivajo na segrevanje ozračja, pospešitev postopne odprave halogeniranih klorofluoroogljikovodikov ter zajemanje in uničenje toplogrednih plinov iz zavrženih proizvodov in opreme, ki škodujejo stratosferskemu ozonu;
(a) Phasing down the production and consumption of HFCs with global warming potential, to accelerate the phase-out of HCFCs and recover and destroy stratospheric ozone-depleting GHGs in discarded products and equipment;
(b) znižanje emisij črnega ogljika s poudarkom na emisijah, ki vplivajo na regije, kjer prevladujeta sneg in led, vključno z Arktiko, Grenlandijo ter himalajskimi in tibetanskimi ledeniki;
(b) Reduction of black carbon emissions, giving priority to emissions that affect regions of snow and ice, including the Arctic, Greenland and the Himalayan-Tibetan glaciers;
(c) zmanjšanje plinastih onesnaževal, ki povzročajo nastanek troposferskega ozona, enega večjih toplogrednih plinov.
(c) Reduction of pollutant gases that lead to the formation of tropospheric ozone, a significant GHG.
Kakšno je stališče Komisije o zgoraj navedeni strategiji?
What is the Commission’s position on the abovementioned strategy?
Ali namerava ustrezno dopolniti svojo politiko za blažitev podnebnih sprememb?
Does the Commission intend to complement its policy on climate change mitigation accordingly?
Ali namerava podati zakonodajni predlog v zvezi s podnebju škodljivimi antropogenimi emisijami, ki niso emisije CO2?
Does the Commission intend to present a legislative proposal in regard to non-CO2 climate-relevant anthropogenic emissions?
Ali namerava nadaljevati stroškovno analizo zmanjšanja teh podnebju škodljivih antropogenih emisij, ki niso emisije CO2?
Does the Commission intend to pursue a cost-analysis of the reduction of emissions of these non-CO2 climate-relevant anthropogenic emissions?