natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali bi lahko predsednik nadalje razložil, zakaj pred potrditvijo Komisije ni bilo natančne preiskave?
Would the President further explain why such rigorous examination was lacking prior to the approval of his Commission?
Ali lahko predsednik jamči, da bodo vsi bodoči kandidati za komisarje avtomatično imeli podrobni razgovor glede njihove preteklosti, tako da se bodo lahko odkrile vse morebitne zadrege ter se uredile ali odpravile že na samem začetku?
Can the President assure me that all future candidate commissioners will automatically be subject to in-depth interviews regarding their past, so that any potential embarrassment can be identified and established or eliminated from the outset?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0075/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0075/04
Izjava o športu v Amsterdamski pogodbi iz leta 1997, Izjava o športu, ki je bila priložena sklepom Evropskega sveta iz Nice (leto 2000), in Helsinško poročilo o športu (december 1999) poudarjajo socialno vlogo športa, zlasti pri oblikovanju identitete in povezovanju ljudi, kakor tudi njegove posebne značilnosti.
The social function of sport, in particular its role in forging identity and bringing people together as well as its specific characteristics, have been emphasised by the Declaration on Sport of the 1997 Amsterdam Treaty, the Declaration on sport annexed to the conclusions of the 2000 Nice European Council and the Helsinki report on sport (December 1999).
Ta proces, ki ga je spodbudila Amsterdamska pogodba, se je zaključil z njegovo vključitvijo v Ustavno pogodbo, kot pravno podlago za šport, kot je že večkrat zahteval Parlament.
This process, initiated in the Amsterdam Treaty, has been concluded with the inclusion in the Constitutional Treaty of a legal base for sport, as requested by the Parliament on several occasions.
Evropsko leto izobraževanja skozi šport (leto 2004) se izteka; katere ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti na športnem področju za pripravo na izvajanje novega člena o športu, ko se bo Ustavna pogodba ratificirala?
Since the European Year of Education through Sport (2004) is coming to an end, which measures does the Commission intend to take in the area of sport in order to prepare the implementation of the new article on sport, once the Constitutional Treaty is ratified?
Katere ukrepe bi Komisija uporabila za zagotavljanje načela "participativne demokracije" v športnih organizacijah?
Which measures would the Commission take to guarantee the principle of "participatory democracy" in sports organisations?
Ali obstaja potreba po razlagi uporabe pravil o državni pomoči za športne organizacije, predvsem nogometne klube, za zagotavljanje enakih pogojev na evropskih tekmah?
Is there a need to clarify the application of State aid rules to sport organisations, in particular football clubs, in order to guarantee a level playing field in European competitions?
Ali Komisija meni, da so nedavni predlogi v evropskih nogometnih klubih za zagotavljanje najmanjšega števila nacionalnih igralcev ali igralcev, ki trenirajo v državi, kjer je bil ustanovljen klub, upravičeni in v skladu z določili Pogodbe, še posebej kar se tiče prostega gibanja delavcev?
Does the Commission believe that recent proposals to guarantee a minimum number of national players or players trained in the country where the club is established in European football clubs are justified and in accordance with Treaty rules, particularly on freedom of movement for workers?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0076/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0076/04
Zadeva: Odnosi EU - sredozemska regija
Subject: EU relations with the Mediterranean region
Evropski svet je 4. in 5. novembra 2004 sklenil, da do 2006 podaljša izvajanje skupne strategije EU za sredozemsko regijo, sprejete junija 2000.
At its meeting of 4 and 5 November 2004, the Council decided to extend until 2006 the implementation of the EU's Common Strategy on the Mediterranean region, which was adopted in June 2000.
Ali Svet deset let po Barcelonski izjavi ne meni, da je nastopil čas za opredelitev celostne strategije, ki bi evro-sredozemsko partnerstvo umestila v praktično institucionalni okvir, kot tudi za srečanje voditeljev držav te regije v ta namen?
Ten years after the Barcelona Declaration, does not the Council feel that the time has come for a global strategy to be established so as to provide the Euro-Mediterranean partnership with a quasi-institutional structure and, with that in mind, to convene a meeting of the Heads of State of the region?
Katere pobude namerava Svet sprejeti na področju varnosti in sodelovanja s sredozemskimi državami partnericami za krepitev okolja zaupanja in dialoga (ob soočanju s skupnimi izzivi, vključno z bojem proti terorizmu, širjenju orožja za množično uničevanje) ter spoštovanja človekovih pravic, kot tudi za krepitev demokracije?
What initiatives is the Council thinking of taking in the field of security and cooperation with our Mediterranean partner countries in order to consolidate a climate of confidence and dialogue, at a time when we are faced by common challenges such as the fight against terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and respect for human rights, as well as to promote democracy?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0077/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0077/04
Ali Komisija deset let po Barcelonski izjavi ne meni, da je nastopil čas za opredelitev celostne strategije, ki bi evro-sredozemsko partnerstvo umestila v praktično institucionalni okvir, kot tudi za srečanje voditeljev držav te regije v ta namen?
Ten years after the Barcelona Declaration, does not the Commission feel that the time has come for a global strategy to be established so as to provide the Euro-Mediterranean partnership with a quasi-institutional structure and, with that in mind, to convene a meeting of the Heads of State of the region?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0078/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0078/04
, v imenu Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ,
, on behalf of the Committee on International Trade ,
, v imenu Odbora za razvoj
, on behalf of the Committee on Development
Zadeva: Ukrepi za boj proti lakoti in revščini
Subject: Action against Hunger and Poverty
Na pobudo brazilskega predsednika Luiza Inacia Lule da Silve, so se 20. septembra, na predvečer letne razprave Generalne skupščine Združenih narodov, sestali predsednik Lula ter predsedniki Francije, Španije, Čila in generalni sekretar ZN Kofi Annan ("Quintet against Hunger"), da bi razpravljali o nadaljnjih mednarodnih ukrepih za boj proti lakoti, premagovanje revščine ter povečanje financiranja in razvoja.
At the initiative of President Luis Inácio Lula da Silva, of Brazil, on 20 September, the eve of the United Nations General Assembly’s annual debate, President Lula and the Presidents of France, Spain and Chile, as well as UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan (the "Quintet against Hunger") gathered to discuss further international action to fight hunger, overcome poverty and increase finance and development.
Peterica je združila predstavnike 110 držav članic, vključno z več kot 50 prisotnimi voditelji držav in vlad, da bi sprejeli newyorško deklaracijo o ukrepih za boj proti lakoti in revščini.
The Quintet rallied representatives of 110 member states - including the more than 50 Heads of State and Government present - to adopt the New York Declaration on the Action against Hunger and Poverty.
Peterica je ustanovila tehnično skupino za inovativne finančne mehanizme, katere poročilo je služilo kot temelj razprave.
The Quintet had established a Technical Group on Innovative Financing Mechanisms, whose report served as the basis of the discussion.
20. septembra so predstavili idejo o Svetovnem skladu proti lakoti in revščini, ki temelji na inovativnih finančnih mehanizmih.
On 20 September they presented the idea of a Global Fund Against Hunger and Poverty based on innovative financing mechanisms.
Pobuda je del mednarodnih prizadevanj za doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja (MDGs), katerih namen je med drugim do leta 2015 omogočiti splošen dostop do osnovnošolskega izobraževanja in prepolovitev stopenj lakote in skrajne stopnje revščine na svetu.
This initiative is part of the international effort to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which seek, among other things, to achieve universal access to primary education and reduce by half the levels of hunger and extreme poverty in the world by 2015.
Poročilo med različnimi predlogi za inovativne načine financiranja razvoja navaja: obdavčitev finančnih transakcij, obdavčitev trgovine z orožjem, vzpostavitev mednarodnega finančnega instrumenta, s katerim bi lahko države na trgu obveznic listinile svoje obveznosti glede povečanja Uradne razvojne pomoči (ODA), posebne pravice črpanja za financiranje razvoja, mednarodne ukrepe proti davčnim utajam in davčnim oazam, povečanje koristi od nakazil, ustanavljanje mehanizma za prostovoljne prispevke preko kreditnih kartic in oblikovanje "etičnih skladov", ki naj omogočijo možnosti za družbeno odgovorno investiranje
Among the various proposals for innovative ways of financing development, the report numbered taxation of financial transactions, taxation of the arms trade, creation of an international financial facility through which States could securitize their increases in future Official Development Assistance (ODA) on the bond markets, special drawing rights for financing development, international action against tax evasion and tax havens, increasing the benefits of remittances, establishing a mechanism for voluntary contributions through credit cards and the creation of ”ethical funds” providing opportunities for socially responsible investing.
Če vse države članice Evropske unije podprejo newyorško deklaracijo, ali namerava Svet sprejeti uradno stališče in zahtevati od Komisije, da poda ustrezno oceno glede različnih predlaganih mehanizmov?
Given that all the Member States of the European Union support the New York Declaration, does the Council intend to adopt a formal position asking the Commission to give due consideration to the various proposed mechanisms?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0079/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0079/04
Zadeva: Ukrepi proti lakoti in revščini
Subject: Action against Hunger and Poverty
Peterica je združila predstavnike 110 držav članic, vključno z več kot 50 prisotnimi voditelji držav in vlad, da bi sprejeli newyorško deklaracijo o ukrepih za boj proti lakoti in revščini.
The Quintet rallied representatives of 110 Member States - including the more than 50 Heads of State and Government present - to adopt the New York Declaration on the Action against Hunger and Poverty.
Poročilo med različnimi predlogi za inovativne načine financiranja razvoja navaja: obdavčitev finančnih transakcij, obdavčitev trgovine z orožjem, vzpostavitev mednarodnega finančnega instrumenta, s katerim bi lahko države na trgu obveznic listinile svoje obveznosti glede povečanja Uradne razvojne pomoči (ODA), posebne pravice črpanja za financiranje razvoja, mednarodne ukrepe proti davčnim utajam in davčnim oazam, povečanje koristi od nakazil, ustanavljanje mehanizma za prostovoljne prispevke preko kreditnih kartic in oblikovanje "etičnih skladov", ki naj omogočijo možnosti za družbeno odgovorno investiranje.
Among the various proposals for innovative ways of financing development, the report numbered taxation of financial transactions, taxation of the arms trade, creation of an international financial facility through which States could securitize their increases in future Official Development Assistance (ODA) on the bond markets, special drawing rights for financing development, international action against tax evasion and tax havens, increasing the benefits of remittances, establishing a mechanism for voluntary contributions through credit cards and the creation of ”ethical funds” providing opportunities for socially responsible investing.
Katera je predhodna ocena Komisije v zvezi s temi mehanizmi in katere možnosti predvideva za njihovo izvajanje?
What is the preliminary assessment of the Commission concerning these mechanisms and which possibilities does the Commission envisage in implementing them?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0080/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0080/04
, v imenu Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko
, on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Zadeva: Prenehanje veljavnosti sporazuma WTO o tekstilu in oblačilih
Subject: Expiry of the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing
Komisija je 13. oktobra sprejela akcijski načrt za pomoč evropski tekstilni industriji v njenem boju za preživetje, saj po leta 2005 nobeni članici Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (WTO) ne bo več dovoljeno določati uvoznih kvot za oblačila in tekstil.
On 13 October the Commission adopted an Action Plan to assist the European textile industry in its struggle for survival as from 2005, when no WTO member will any longer be permitted to impose quotas on imports of clothing and textiles.
To pomeni, da se bo na svetovnem trgu še povečala prevlada držav, kot je Kitajska, ki kot članica WTO očitno krši številne obveznosti, naprimer dolžnost ravnanja v skladu s tržnimi pogoji oziroma obvezo po odprtju svojega trga.
This will further increase the dominance on the world market of countries such as China, which manifestly ignores a number of its obligations as a WTO member, such as the duty to adopt practices compatible with market conditions and to open up its own market.
Ali Svet meni, da je sprejeti paket ukrepov ustrezen?
Does the Council consider this package of measures adequate?
Ali bo dopustil propad dela evropske tekstilne industrije ne glede na to, kaj se bo zgodilo?
Does it assume that part of the European textile industry will be destroyed no matter what happens?
Kako je do sedaj poleg političnih in diplomatskih pritiskov upošteval ukrepe, ki so jih nekatere države članice predlagale za obvladovanje povečevanja kvot?
How has it taken account of measures, in addition to political and diplomatic pressure, suggested by some of the Member States to cope with the lifting of the quota?
Ali Svet lahko pojasni posledice, ki jih bo odprava sistema kvot imela za države v razvoju ter kako bo njihove možne učinke upošteval pri ukrepih, ki jih namerava sprejeti v zvezi s tekstilno in oblačilno industrijo, kot to zahteva člen 178 Pogodbe?
Can the Council comment on the impact of the disappearance of the quota system for developing countries, and can it indicate how it will take account of these likely effects in the measures it intends to put in place in relation to the EU textile and clothing industry, as is called for under Article 178 of the Treaty?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0081/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0081/04
Ali Komisija meni, da je sprejeti paket ukrepov ustrezen?
Does the Commission consider this package of measures adequate?
Ali bo dopustila propad dela evropske tekstilne industrije ne glede na to, kaj se bo zgodilo?
Does it assume that part of the European textile industry will be destroyed no matter what happens?
Kako je do sedaj poleg političnih in diplomatskih pritiskov upoštevala ukrepe, ki so jih nekatere države članice predlagale za obvladovanje povečevanja kvot?
How has it taken account of measures, in addition to political and diplomatic pressure, suggested by some of the Member States to cope with the lifting of the quota?
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni posledice, ki jih bo odprava sistema kvot imela za države v razvoju ter kako bo njihove možne učinke upoštevala pri ukrepih, ki jih namerava sprejeti v zvezi s tekstilno in oblačilno industrijo, kot to zahteva člen 178 Pogodbe?
Can the Commission comment on the impact of the disappearance of the quota system for developing countries, and can it indicate how it will take account of these likely effects in the measures it intends to put in place in relation to the EU textile and clothing industry, as is called for under Article 178 of the Treaty?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0082/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0082/04
, v imenu Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve
, on behalf of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
Zadeva: Odpoved delovnega razmerja jezikovnim učiteljem pri Komisiji
Subject: Dismissal of Commission language teachers
9. junija 2004 je kolegij Komisije sklenil nenadoma odpovedati delovno razmerje 43 učiteljem, ki so imeli po belgijski zakonodaji sklenjeno pogodbo za nedoločen čas.
On 9 June 2004, the College of the Commission decided to abruptly dismiss the 43 teachers with permanent contracts under Belgian law.
Jezikovni učitelji so pred tem za Komisijo delali med 20 in 30 let.
The language teachers had been working for the Commission for between 20 and 30 years.
Ali je Komisija pred enostransko kršitvijo tristranskega sporazuma o zadevi obvestila Svet in Parlament in se z njima posvetovala?
Did the Commission inform and consult the Council and Parliament before unilaterally breaching the Trilogue Agreement?
Če da, kdaj?
If so, when was this done?
Kdaj je Komisija o odpovedi delovnega razmerja obvestila predstavnike učiteljev, sindikalne predstavnike in tamkajšnji odbor zaposlenih in na kakšen način?
When did the Commission inform the teachers’ representatives, the union representatives and the Local Personnel Committee of the dismissal and by what means was this done?
Kakšno obvestilo je poslala predstavnikom učiteljev, sindikalnim zastopnikom in tamkajšnjemu odboru zaposlenih?
What kind of information was communicated to the teachers’ representatives, the union representatives and the Local Personnel Committee?
Ali Komisija meni, da je način, s katerim se je lotila zadeve, zgleden primer dobre prakse kar zadeva predhodnega posvetovanja in določil o pravočasnem obveščanju?
Does the Commission consider that its handling of this matter stands as a good example of best practice in terms of prior consultation and the provision of information in good time?
Ali Komisija meni, da se polno zaveda lastne socialne odgovornosti do prizadetih učiteljev?
Does the Commission feel it has fully faced up to its social responsibility to the teachers concerned?
Ali Komisija lahko pojasni mnenja, ki jih je njena pravna služba pripravila o odpovedi delovnega razmerja učiteljem, kot je to želel GD ADMIN, ter predloži njihove kopije?
Can the Commission comment on and provide copies of any opinions given by the Commission’s Legal Service on the dismissal of the teachers requested by DG ADMIN?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0083/04/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0083/04/rev.1
Zadeva: Mednarodni akcijski načrt za zmanjšanje prilova
Subject: International plan of action on bycatch reduction
Po najnovejših podatkih, ki jih je objavila Organizacija ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO), se v svetovnem merilu zaradi neselektivne ribolovne dejavnosti letno zavrže 7,3 milijone ton neciljnih morskih vrst.
According to the most recent data published by the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 7.3 million tonnes of non-target marine species are discarded globally each year as a result of unselective fishing practices.
V zadnjih desetih letih se je iz proračuna EU letno prispevalo 8 milijonov evrov za več kot 400 raziskovalnih projektov, ki so prispevali k izboljševanju selektivnosti orodja, zmanjševanju zavržkov ali ugotavljanju posledic ribolova na okolje.
Over the past 10 years, the EU budget has annually contributed € 8 million to over 400 research projects aimed at increasing gear selectivity, reducing discards or quantifying the impact of fishing on the environment.
Bistvenega pomena je, da se pozornost preusmeri na izvajanje zelo potrebnih ukrepov za zmanjševanje prilova.
It is vital that the focus now shifts to the implementation of much-needed bycatch reduction measures.
Poleg tega je prilov svetovni problem in ostaja eden izmed glavnih problemov ribolova 21. stoletja, ki ga Mednarodni akcijski načrt (IPOA) Organizacije ZN za prehrano in kmetijstvo še ni obravnaval.
Furthermore, bycatch is a global problem and remains one of the principal fisheries issues of the 21st century not to be addressed by an FAO International Plan of Action (IPOA).
Sprejem Mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za zmanjšanje prilova je nujno potreben in bi lahko igral osrednjo vlogo pri mednarodnem zmanjševanju prilova.
The adoption of an IPOA on bycatch reduction is urgently required and could play a pivotal role in reducing bycatch internationally.
180 vodilnih morskih znanstvenikov in NVO zagovarja sprejem Mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za zmanjšanje prilova in več držav članic FAO se je že zavezalo, da bodo na naslednji seji Odbora za ribištvo (COFI) FAO v marcu leta 2005 podprle takšen predlog.
180 leading marine scientists and NGOs advocate the adoption of an IPOA on bycatch reduction, and several member nations of the FAO have already committed to supporting such a proposal at the next meeting of the FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI) in March 2005.
Doslej še nobena država ni prevzela te pobude.
As yet, no nation has pledged to take a lead in proposing this initiative.
Ali bi glede na to, da je EU ena izmed najmočnejših ribolovnih sil, Evropska komisija morala prevzeti pobudo pri predlaganju Mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za zmanjšanje prilova na 26. zasedanju Odbora za ribištvo FAO?
Given that the EU is a major fishing power, is the European Commission therefore committed to taking a lead in proposing an IPOA on bycatch reduction at the 26th COFI Session of the FAO?
Ali se Komisija zaveda, da se bo v primeru neuvrstitve Mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za zmanjšanje prilova na dnevni red FAO v letu 2005, moralo čakati do naslednjega zasedanja Odbora za ribištvo FAO v letu 2007?
Does the Commission recognise that if an IPOA on bycatch reduction is not put on the FAO agenda in 2005, it will be necessary to wait until the next COFI Session in 2007?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0084/04/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0084/04/rev.1
Zadeva: Odpis dolgov državam v razvoju po zmanjšanju iraškega dolga
Subject: Debt relief for developing countries following the cutting of Iraqi debt
'Pariški klub', skupina 19 držav upnic, ki vključuje 12 držav članic, se je v Berlinu 21. novembra dogovorila za 80-odstotno zmanjšanje iraškega dolga za pomoč pri obnovi države.
The 'Paris Club', a group of 19 creditor nations including 12 EU Member States, agreed on 21 November 2004 in Berlin to cut Iraq's debts by 80% in order to aid reconstruction of the country.
Odpis dolga bo potekal v treh fazah - 30% takoj, naslednjih 30% leta 2005 in 20% leta 2008.
The debt will be cancelled in three stages - 30% immediately, another 30% in 2005 and 20% in 2008.
Potreba po stabilizaciji Iraka je razumljiva in tako občutno zmanjšanje dolga bo k njej nedvomno pripomoglo.
The need to stabilise Iraq is understandable, and no doubt cutting the country's debt so drastically will help these efforts.
Ker veliko najrevnejših držav na svetu še vedno servisira svoj dolg, je treba potezo Pariškega kluba, da zmanjša iraški dolg pozdraviti le, če pokaže enako zavezanost pri odpisovanju dolgov vseh držav v razvoju.
Nevertheless, given that so many of the poorest countries in the world still have to service their debts, the moves of the Paris Club to cut Iraq's debt should be applauded only if the same commitment is shown to cancelling the debts of all the world's developing countries.
Sprejetih je bilo že nešteto pobud za boljše upravljanje dolgov ter za spremembo pogojev njihovega servisiranja.
Countless initiatives have been taken to make debt more manageable and to change the requirements of servicing debt.
Nekatere pobude so državam zmanjšale breme, nekatere pa povzročile, da so nekatere države izgubile zaradi samovoljnih pravil o klasifikaciji za zmanjšanje dolga.
Although some initiatives have lessened the burden on countries, others have meant some countries have lost out because of arbitrary rules for qualification for debt relief.
Za upnike ter še posebej za mednarodne institucije in nacionalne vlade je edina prava pot naprej, da se dogovorijo za celoten odpis dolga držav v razvoju.
The only real way forward is for all creditors, and especially international institutions and national governments, to agree to phase out the debt of the developing world entirely.