natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Medtem je grško ministrstvo za obrambo zaradi dokazanih težav s stabilnostjo zavrnilo izplačilo zapadlega dolga in prevzem prve izmed štirih podmornic.
However, the Greek Ministry of Defence is refusing to pay that sum and take delivery of the first of the submarines owing to confirmed stability problems.
Opozoriti je treba še na dejstvo, da je grška država že izplačala 80 % skupnega zneska za sedem podmornic.
Moreover, the Greek Government has, in fact, already paid 80% of the total sum due for the seven submarines.
Pri obnašanju nemškega podjetja gre za izsiljevanje, saj bi bila odpoved pogodbe močan udarec za ladjedelnico, zaradi česar bi 2000 delavcev podjetja „Hellenic Shipyards S.A.“ ostalo brez službe.
The German company's tactic could be described as blackmail since termination of the contracts means in effect that the shipyards would go out of business, leaving the 2000 workers at the Skaramanga yards jobless.
Ali lahko Komisija odgovori na naslednji vprašanji: Katere ukrepe imajo na voljo države članice, da bi se zoperstavile multinacionalkam, ki brez obotavljanja postavljajo neuresničljive zahteve in pogosto spreminjajo pogodbene pogoje, s čimer ogrožajo delovna mesta?
Will the Commission therefore say what measures Member States can take against multinational companies which do not hesitate to make inordinate demands and breach the terms of their contracts while holding out the threat of redundancies?
Kako lahko Komisija prispeva k ohranjanju omenjenih delovnih mest?
How can the Commission help to preserve these jobs?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0380/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0380/09
Zadeva: Državna pomoč nizozemskim vrtnarijam
Subject: State aid to Dutch horticultural firms
Nizozemski jamstveni sklad Borgstellingsfond omogoča podjetjem iz panoge rastlinjakov pridobitev državnega jamstva, ki pokriva 85% naložbenega posojila v vrednosti do največ 2,5 milijona EUR.
Under the Dutch ‘Borgstellingfonds’ (guarantee fund) businesses in the greenhouse sector are able to obtain a state guarantee which covers 85% of investment loans of up to EUR 2.5 million.
Ali bo Komisija pojasnila, po kakšnem premisleku je bil odobren ta načrt?
What are the Commission’s views concerning the approval of this scheme?
Poleg omenjenega posojilnega načrta obstajajo številni načrti denarne pomoči vrtnarijam.
In addition to the above-mentioned credit scheme, horticultural firms benefit from a number of subsidy schemes.
Ali bo Komisija glede na navedeno komentirala, ali se pri ocenjevanju skladnosti posamezne nove pobude s pravili o državni pomoči upošteva število in obseg obstoječih ukrepov?
With that in mind, will the Commission comment on whether it proposes to take the number and extent of earlier measures into account in assessing whether a particular new initiative is in accordance with the rules on state aid?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0381/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0381/09
Zadeva: Oddajanje programa Al Aksa TV prek Eutelsata
Subject: Broadcasting of Al-Aqsa TV by Eutelsat
Francoski satelitski ponudnik Eutelsat še vedno oddaja televizijski program Al Aksa TV, čeprav vsebina njegovih oddaj neposredno krši člen 3b direktive EU o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah (2007/65/ES ).
The French satellite provider Eutelsat is continuing to broadcast the Al-Aqsa TV television channel even though the content of the latter’s programmes is in direct violation of Article 3b of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (2007/65/EC ).
Takšne oddaje prispevajo tudi k naraščanju radikalizacije v Evropi, kar ogroža evropsko varnost.
Such programmes also contribute to growing radicalisation in Europe, presenting a threat to European security.
Program Al Aksa TV ima v lasti ter ga financira in nadzira organizacija Hamas, ki je na seznamu teroristov EU.
Al-Aqsa TV is owned, funded and controlled by Hamas, an organisation on the EU’s terrorist list.
Francoski organ za radiotelevizijo (Conseil Superieur de l’Audiovisuel) je decembra 2008 obvestil Eutelsat, da vsebina programa Al Aksa TV krši 15. člen francoskega zakona o komunikacijah z dne 30. septembra 1986, v skladu s katerim so prepovedane vse oblike spodbujanja k sovraštvu ali nasilju na podlagi rase, veroizpovedi ali narodnosti.
In December 2008 the French broadcasting authority, the Conseil Supérieur de l’Audiovisuel, informed Eutelsat that the content of Al-Aqsa TV’s programmes breached Article 15 of the French communication law of 30 September 1986, which prohibits all forms of incitement to hatred or violence on the grounds of race, religion or nationality.
Eutelsat kljub sporočilu omenjenega francoskega organa še vedno prenaša program Al Aksa TV, katerega oddaje še vedno kršijo evropsko in francosko avdiovizualno zakonodajo.
Notwithstanding the CSA’s communication, Eutelsat is still carrying Al-Aqsa TV, whose programmes continue to violate European and French audiovisual legislation.
Ali je Svet s tem seznanil francosko vlado?
Has the Council brought this matter to the attention of the French government?
Kaj namerava storiti Svet, da bi ustavil oddajanje programa Al Aksa TV prek Eutelsata?
What action does it intend to take to stop Eutelsat broadcasting Al-Aqsa TV?
16 UL L 332, 18.12.2007, str.
OJ L 332, 18.12.2007, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0382/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0382/09
Francoski organ za radiotelevizijo (Conseil Superieur de l’Audiovisuel) je decembra 2008 obvestil Eutelsat, da vsebina programa Al Aksa TV krši 15. člen francoskega zakona o komunikacijah z dne 30. septembra 1986, v skladu s katerim so prepovedane vse oblike spodbujanja k sovraštvu ali nasilju na podlagi rase, veroizpovedi ali narodnosti.
In December 2008 the French broadcasting authority, the Conseil Supérieur de l’Audiovisuel , informed Eutelsat that the content of Al-Aqsa TV’s programmes breached Article 15 of the French communication law of 30 September 1986, which prohibits all forms of incitement to hatred or violence on the grounds of race, religion or nationality.
Katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija za ustavitev oddajanja programa Al Aksa TV prek evropskega satelitskega ponudnika?
What measures does the Commission plan to take to stop Al-Aqsa TV being broadcast by a European satellite provider?
Ali je Komisija formalno zastavila to vprašanje francoskim organom in kako namerava zagotoviti upoštevanje evropske avdiovizualne zakonodaje?
Has it formally raised the matter with the French authorities, and how does it intend to ensure compliance with European audiovisual legislation?
1 UL L 332, 18.12.2007, str.
OJ L 332, 18.12.2007, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0383/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0383/09
Zadeva: operacija ATALANTA - aretacije piratov
Subject: Operation Atalanta - arrest of pirates
Evropska unija je 8. decembra 2008 začela izvajati vojaško misijo EVOP za boj proti piratstvu in oboroženim roparskim napadom.
Since 8 December 2008, the European Union has been conducting a military ESDP mission to combat piracy and armed robbery.
Med zaslišanjem 3. septembra 2009 pred Odborom za varnost in obrambo je general Henri Bentégeat, predsednik varnostnega odbora EU, izjavil, da „je bilo v zadnjem letu aretiranih 68 piratov, ki so bili predani Keniji“.
At a hearing of the Subcommittee on Security and Defence on 3 September 2009, General Henri Bentégeat, Chair of the EU Military Committee, stated that 68 pirates had been arrested and handed over to Kenya in the past year.
Zakaj so bile aretirane osebe predane Keniji?
Why were the people arrested handed over to Kenya?
Kakšna pravna podlaga omogoča tovrstne aretacije?
What legal basis enables arrests of this kind to be made?
Ali lahko aretacije izvajajo vse ladje, ki sodelujejo pri operaciji ATALANTA?
Are all the ships involved in Operation Atalanta authorised to make arrests?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0384/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0384/09
Zadeva: O spremembi pravil Evropskega socialnega sklada o sofinanciranju in o drugih ukrepih za premostitev socialne recesije
Subject: Amending the rules on European Social Fund cofinancing, and other measures to overcome social decline
Gospodarska recesija je na države Evropske unije vplivala različno.
The economic downturn has affected different EU countries in different ways.
Ene bodo hitro in z lahkoto premagale težke čase, druge pa bodo za to morale plačati višjo ceno.
Some will get over the crisis quickly and easily, while others will have to pay a higher price.
Najslabše je, da bodo to ceno morali plačati tudi ljudje z najnižjimi dohodki.
What is most painful is that this price will have to be paid by people on the lowest incomes.
To lahko dodatno poveča revščino in socialno izključenost.
This may further exacerbate poverty and social exclusion.
Litva je ena tistih držav, v katerih brezposelnost hitro narašča, pokojnine, socialne dajatve in socialni programi pa se zmanjšujejo.
Lithuania is one of the countries where unemployment is rising sharply, while pensions, social benefits and social programmes are shrinking.
Načelo solidarnosti bi moralo veljati tudi v Evropski uniji.
The principle of solidarity should apply in the European Union as well.
Brez dvoma je mogoče najti načine za podporo držav članic, ki so v najhujši stiski.
I have no doubt that ways can be found of supporting those Member States most affected by the crisis.
Kot primer želim omeniti Evropski socialni sklad.
One example I would mention is the European Social Fund (ESF).
Z začasno prekinitvijo nacionalnega sofinanciranja projektov, ki jih financira Evropski socialni sklad, bi se sprostila sredstva, ki bi se lahko namenila reševanju brezposelnosti in socialnih problemov.
If national cofinancing of ESF projects were temporarily suspended, the resources made available could be used to tackle unemployment and social problems.
Kaj meni Svet o možnosti začasne prekinitve nacionalnega sofinanciranja projektov, ki jih financira Evropski socialni sklad?
What is the Council’s view on the possibility of temporarily suspending national cofinancing of ESF projects?
Katere druge ukrepe predlaga Svet, da bi zmanjšali socialno nazadovanje v državah članicah?
What other measures does the Council propose to lessen social decline in the Member States?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0385/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0385/09
Zadeva: Financiranje ob drugem irskem referendumu
Subject: Expenditure in connection with the second Irish referendum
Ali Komisija meni, da veljavni irska in evropska zakonodaja dovoljujeta izvajanje informacijskih dejavnosti med referendumom?
In the Commission's view, is it acceptable under current Irish and European law to carry out information activities in connection with a referendum?
Ali so bili v informacijskih dejavnostih (npr. brošurah), ki jih je financirala Evropska komisija, uravnoteženi argumenti za oziroma proti ratifikaciji Lizbonske pogodbe?
In the information activities financed by the Commission in Ireland (publication of brochures, etc.), was a balance struck between arguments for and against ratification of the Lisbon Treaty?
Kateri argumenti, kritični do Lizbonske pogodbe, so bili navedeni?
What arguments highlighting the drawbacks of the Treaty were put forward?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0386/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0386/09
Zadeva: Uredba o državljanski pobudi
Subject: Regulation on citizens' initiative
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 7. maja 2009 pozval Komisijo, naj po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe nemudoma predloži predlog uredbe o državljanski pobudi ( P6_TA(2009)0389 ).
In its resolution of 7 May 2009, the European Parliament requested the Commission to submit without delay, after the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force, a proposal for a regulation on the citizens' initiative ( P6_TA(2009)0389 ).
Ali je Komisija že pripravila predlog?
Has the Commission drafted a proposal?
Ali ga namerava predložiti kmalu po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe?
Does the Commission intend to submit a proposal for a regulation soon after the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force?
Ali bo upoštevala okvirna navodila iz poročila Evropskega parlamenta na to temo?
Will it adhere to the indications given in the European Parliament report on this subject?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0387/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0387/09
Zadeva: Elektronska identifikacija - Uredba (ES) št. 1560/2007
Subject: EID - Regulation (EC) No 1560/2007
V zvezi z uvedbo obvezne uporabe elektronske identifikacije 31. decembra 2009 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1560/2007 naj Komisija razmisli o njenem odlogu, saj oprema, ki se uporablja za skeniranje/branje, ni natančna, zaradi česar bodo imeli kmetje velike težave.
With regard to the introduction of compulsory EID on 31 December 2009 under Regulation (EC) No 1560/2007 , will the Commission please consider delaying the compulsory EID on the grounds that the equipment used for scanning/reading of tags is not accurate, which will cause major problems for farmers.
Ali bi lahko Komisija iz navedenega razloga uvedla zgolj prostovoljno uporabo sistema od 31. decembra 2009?
Would the Commission therefore bring in the scheme on a voluntary basis alone, as from 31 December 2009?
2 UL L 340, 22.12.2007, str.
1 OJ L 340, 22.12.2007, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0388/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0388/09
Zadeva: Odložitev predloga komisarke Neelie Kroes o možnosti odškodninskih zahtevkov oseb, oškodovanih zaradi ravnanja kartelov
Subject: Delay in the Kroes proposal on the possibility for parties damaged by cartels to claim compensation
Na seji Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve 29. septembra 2009 je komisarka Kroes govorila o predlogu, da bi strankam, ki so jih oškodovali karteli, omogočili več pravnih možnosti za zahtevanje odškodnine.
At the meeting of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) on 29 September 2009, Commissioner Kroes spoke about her proposal to give parties that have been damaged by cartels greater legal scope to demand compensation.
Dejala je, da je predlog zelo pomemben in da ji je zelo pri srcu.
She said that the proposal was ‘of great importance’ and was close to her heart.
7. oktobra bi ga bilo treba predstaviti kolegiju komisarjev.
The proposal was to be put to the College of Commissioners on 7 October.
Toda posebni sestanek, ki naj bi potekal v petek, 2. oktobra, je bil na zahtevo predsednikovega kabineta preklican.
The special meeting planned for Friday 2 October was, however, cancelled at the request of the President's cabinet.
Predlog je skrivnostno izginil z radarja.
The proposal mysteriously went off the radar.
Zakaj je predlog izginil z dnevnega reda Komisije, čeprav je komisarka Kroes v odboru ECON napovedala, da bo kolegij komisarjev hitro sprejel odločitev?
Why did this proposal disappear from the Commission agenda, when Commissioner Kroes had indicated to the ECON Committee that the College of Commissioners would reach a decision quickly?
V dnevniku Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) z dne 20. oktobra 2009 je bilo navedeno, da je predsednik Odbora za pravne zadeve Evropskega parlamenta, ki je obenem partner v nizozemski odvetniški pisarni, ki se ukvarja s kartelskimi zadevami, vplival na Komisijo, naj predlog zadrži.
According to the FAZ (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung) of 20 October 2009, the chair of the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs, who is also a partner in a German law firm that deals with cartel cases, has put pressure on the Commission to delay its decision.
Ali to drži?
Is this true?
Kaj meni Komisija o morebitnem konfliktu interesov predsednika Odbora za pravne zadeve, o katerem poroča članek v FAZ?
What does the Commission think of the possibility reported in the FAZ article that the chair of the Legal Affairs Committee may have a conflict of interests?
Kdaj lahko pričakujemo predlog?
When can we expect the proposal?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0389/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0389/09
Zadeva: Delovanje Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in njegov vpliv v državah članicah Sveta Evrope
Subject: Activities of the European Court of Human Rights and implications in the Member States of the Council of Europe
Evropska unija je najpomembnejši institucionalni partner Sveta Evrope na politični in tehnični ravni.
The European Union is the Council of Europe’s most important institutional partner at both political and technical levels.
Njuni skupni cilji so okrepiti evropski skupni pravni prostor in oblikovati usklajen sistem za varstvo temeljnih pravic, s poudarkom na merilih za človekove pravice, pravno državo in demokracijo na vsej evropski celini.
Their common goals are to strengthen the European common legal space, and to build a coherent system of fundamental rights’ protection, focusing on benchmarks for human rights, the rule of law and democracy throughout the whole of Europe.
Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice je ena od institucij, ki so bile ustanovljene, da bi uresničevale te skupne cilje, njen namen pa je zlasti varovati človekove pravice državljanov držav članic Sveta Evrope.
The European Court of Human Rights is one of the institutions established to implement those common goals, especially dedicated to protecting the human rights of citizens from all Council of Europe Member States.
Žal je v delu Sodišča opaziti pomanjkljivosti.
There are unfortunately shortcomings in the work of the Court.
Na sodb pred omenjenim sodiščem čaka približno 100.000 nerešenih zadev, od tega jih je 60.000 iz Romunije, Ukrajine, Turčije in Rusije (samo iz slednje je 20.000 zadev).
There are about 100 000 cases pending at the Court, 60 000 of which come from Romania, Ukraine, Turkey and Russia (about 20 000 from Russia alone).
Poleg tega vsak mesec priteče 2000 novih nerešenih zadev, obdobje, ki preteče do razrešitve zadeve pri Sodišču, pa je doseglo 7 let.
On top of that, there is an influx of 2 000 pending cases each month, and the period for solving cases at the Court has reached 7 years.
Zato so prosilci, katerih človekove pravice so bile v njihovih državah kršene, prisiljeni čakati na pravico vsaj 10 let.
This means that applicants who have experienced human rights violations in their countries are forced to wait almost 10 years for justice.
Počasni postopki na Sodišču ustvarjajo okoliščine, ki kršijo pravico prosilcev do pravočasne in pravične razsodbe.
The slow procedures at the Court create a situation which breaches the rights of applicants to a timely and fair hearing.
Nekateri strokovnjaki menijo, da so razmere kritične.
Some experts view this situation as critical.
Če v najbližji prihodnosti ne bomo našli rešitve, bo Sodišče samo krivo za izgubo ugleda.
If no solution is found in the very near future, the Court may lose credibility.
Kako Svet ocenjuje razmere?
How does the Council view this situation?
Katere ukrepe namerava izvesti, da bi pripomogel k boljšemu/lažjemu delu Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ?
What actions does the Council intend to take in order to help improve/facilitate the work of the European Court of Human Rights?
Kaj lahko na tem pordročju naredijo države članice?
What could EU Member States do in this field?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0390/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0390/09
Zadeva: Gospodarsko okrevanje in spodbujanje zaposlovanja
Subject: Economic recovery and promoting employment
Ponovno okrevanje gospodarstva, spodbujanje zaposlovanja ter zmanjševanje brezposelnosti je trenutno glavna tema razprav.
The main topic of debate at the present time is how to achieve economic recovery while boosting employment and reducing unemployment.
Kako je mogoče strukturne spremembe in konsolidacijo proračuna uskladiti z ekspanzivno davčno politiko, ki je po mnenju mnogih potrebna, da bi se povečalo zaposlovanje?
How can structural changes and budgetary consolidation be reconciled with an expansionary fiscal policy, which is widely considered necessary to increase employment?
Ali Komisija meni, da je mogoče zaposlovanje v Evropi povečati z ukrepi, ki jih je pred nedavnim predlagala, kot so spremembe sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji in novi mikrofinančni mehanizem, ali je potrebna nova, kohezivna evropska strategija zaposlovanja?
Does the Commission think that the measures it recently proposed, such as changes to the Globalisation Adjustment Fund, and the new microfinance mechanism, are sufficient to boost employment in Europe or is there a need for a new, cohesive European strategy for employment?
Ali namerava Komisija na tem področju prevzeti nove pobude ali meni, da je to v pristojnosti vlad držav članic?
Does the Commission intend to take new initiatives in this area or does it think that this is the responsibility of the Member States’ governments?
Kako bo zagotovila skladnost različnih nacionalnih politik zaposlovanja, da ne bi škodovale enotnemu evropskemu trgu ali socialni koheziji na evropski ravni?
How will it ensure consistency of the various national policies on employment, so as not to adversely affect the single European market or social cohesion at European level?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0391/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0391/09
Zadeva: Odobritev megatovornjakov
Subject: Authorisation of gigaliners
Septembra 2009 sem zastavil vprašanje za pisni odgovor ( E-4313/09 ) o študijah o megatovornjakih, ki jih je naročila Evropska komisija.
In September 2009, I tabled a written question ( E-4313/09 ) on the gigaliner studies commissioned by the Commission.
Žal moram ugotoviti, da Komisija v odgovoru na to vprašanje nikakor ni odgovorila na moja vprašanja.
I regret to have to note that the Commission did not answer my questions at all in its reply to the written question.
Veliko nevladnih organizacij je že podvomilo v rezultate in kakovost študij.
Several non-governmental organisations have already expressed doubts about the results and the quality of the studies.
Ob odzivu Evropske komisije na moje vprašanje za pisni odgovor tudi sam čedalje bolj dvomim v njihovo vrednost.
The Commission’s reaction to my written question has served only to confirm my doubts regarding the value of these studies.
Komisijo zato naprošam, naj med časom za vprašanja konkretno odgovori na moje vprašanje.
I would therefore now urgently ask you to actually answer my question in Question Time.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0392/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0392/09
Zadeva: Ratifikacija energetske listine
Subject: Ratification of the Energy Charter
Čeprav je Rusija po zgledu drugih 50 držav v letu 1994 podpisala energetsko listino in dokumente, ki se nanjo nanašajo, pa Moskva te listine še ni ratificirala.
Russia, along with 50 other countries, signed the Energy Charter Treaty and related documents in 1994, but Moscow has yet to ratify them.
V avgustu je Rusija uradno zavrnila ratifikacijo pogodbe in njenega protokola o energetski učinkovitosti ter pripadajoče okoljske vidike.
In August, Russia officially refused to ratify the treaty and its accompanying protocol on energy efficiency and related environmental aspects.
Energetske listine nista še ratificirali tudi Belorusija in Norveška.
Belarus and Norway have also yet to ratify the Energy Charter.
Že od leta 2000 si EU zaman prizadeva, da bi Rusija po ratifikaciji listine pričela potrebne naložbe v energetski razvoj in tehniko, da bi zrušila monopol v sektorju za distribucijo energije ter da bi na energetskem trgu liberalizirala naložbe.
Since 2000, the EU has been trying in vain to ensure that Russia, once it has signed the treaty, makes the necessary investments in developing energy technology, dismantling monopolies concerning the distribution of energy resources, and liberalising energy-market-related investments.
Na ravni EU je bil večkrat poudarjen pomen, ki ga ima pogodba o energetski listini ter spoštovanje obveznosti za vse države, ki so jo podpisale.
The importance of the Energy Charter Treaty and of meeting the commitments made by all the countries that have signed it has been stated more than once at EU level.
Katere druge ukrepe bi bilo treba po mnenju Sveta sprejeti za dejansko zagotovitev izvajanja omenjenih določb?
In the Presidency’s view, what further work will be required to ensure that the provisions in question are implemented in practice?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0393/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0393/09
Zadeva: Ohranitev delovnih mest v industriji
Subject: Safeguarding jobs in the industrial sector
Strokovnjaki trdijo, da je Litva že prestala najhujšo fazo recesije.
Experts state that Lithuania is now over the worst of the economic recession.
Septembra je Komisija pozitivno ocenila njene ukrepe za spodbuditev konjunkture.
In September, the Commission gave a positive evaluation of the economic recovery measures taken in Lithuania.