natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali je Komisija pripravljena spodbujati takojšnjo odpravo proizvodnje in uporabe fluoriranih ogljikovodikov na mednarodni ravni ob upoštevanju Montrealskega protokola in ne prek prožnih mehanizmov Kjotskega protokola, da bi tako bolje uresničila cilje blažitve podnebnih sprememb?
Is the Commission ready to promote an immediate phase-down at international level of the production and consumption of HFCs through the Montreal Protocol, rather than through the Kyoto Protocol’s flexible mechanisms, to serve better the objectives of climate change mitigation?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000136/2011
Question for oral answer O-000136/2011
v imenu Odbora za peticije Zadeva: Svoboda nezdruževanja (peticija št. 0901/2008)
on behalf of the Committee on Petitions Subject: Freedom of non-association (Petition 0901/2008)
Leta 2008 je švedsko združenje krščanskih poslovnežev predložilo peticijo (št. 0901/2008), v kateri je navedlo, da so bili njegovi člani žrtve groženj in ustrahovanj, ker zaradi verskih razlogov niso hoteli podpisati kolektivnih pogodb, sklenjenih s švedskimi sindikati.
In 2008, a Swedish Christian union of business owners submitted a petition (0901/2008) in which it indicated that its members had been threatened and intimidated because they declined for religious reasons to subscribe to collective agreements concluded by Swedish trade unions.
Pobudniki peticije so poudarili, da njihova podjetja izpolnjujejo vse zakonske zahteve ter da ponujajo enake, če ne celo boljše, delovne pogoje kot druga podjetja.
The petitioners pointed out that the businesses in question complied with all legal requirements and offered working conditions which were as good as, or better than, elsewhere.
Prav tako trdijo, da so švedski sindikati v tej zadevi nesorazmerno strogi ter da je svoboda nezdruževanja pravica posameznika, ki je povsem enakovredna svobodi združevanja.
The petitioners argue that trade unions in Sweden are taking a disproportionately hard line and that freedom of non-association is an individual right equal in weight to the freedom of association.
V tem primeru gre za spodbijanje svobode posameznikov, da se iz verskih razlogov ne pridružijo kolektivnim združenjem ali kolektivnim pogodbam (negativna svoboda združevanja).
The right at stake is the one of respect for freedom not to join collective associations or collective agreements for religious reasons (negative freedom of association).
Zato pobudniki peticije menijo, da je negativna svoboda združevanja absolutna pravica in da jo je zato treba zaščititi.
The petitioners consider that the negative freedom of association is an absolute one and needs protecting.
– Ali se Komisija strinja, da je negativna svoboda združevanja temeljna in absolutna pravica v okviru pogodb ter drugih ustreznih konvencij in sporazumov, ki so obvezujoči za države članice EU?
– Does the Commission agree that the negative freedom of association is a fundamental and absolute right under the Treaties and other relevant conventions and agreements that are binding upon EU Member States?
– Ali se strinja, da je negativna svoboda združevanja enako pomembna kakor pozitivna svoboda združevanja in da jo je treba zaščititi?
– Does the Commission agree that the negative freedom of association has the same importance as the positive right of association and needs to be protected?
– Ali v zvezi s svobodo nezdruževanja meni, da je švedska zakonodaja o delovnih razmerjih popolnoma v skladu s črko in duhom pogodb ter drugih ustreznih konvencij in sporazumov, ki so obvezujoči za države članice EU?
– With regard to the freedom of non-association, does the Commission believe that the Swedish labour relations legislation is fully in line with the letter and the spirit of the Treaties and other relevant conventions and agreements that are binding upon EU Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000137/2011
Question for oral answer O-000137/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Prenova madžarske ustave
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Revised Hungarian Constitution
Madžarske opozicijske stranke, madžarske, evropske in mednarodne nevladne organizacije, evropski in mednarodni organi, kot je Beneška komisija, posebni poročevalci ZN, predstavniki vlad in parlamentov držav članic ter celo generalni sekretar ZN so izrazili številne resne pomisleke o postopku, ki je bil uporabljen, in o skladnosti osnutka besedila ustave s temeljnimi pravicami, pravno državo in demokracijo, ki temeljijo na ustreznih zavorah in ravnovesjih ter na zaščiti manjšin pred prevlado večine.
Hungarian opposition parties, Hungarian, European and international NGOs, European and international bodies such as the Venice Commission, UN special rapporteurs, representatives of the governments and parliaments of Member States and even the UN Secretary-General have all raised numerous serious concerns about the process followed and the compatibility of the draft text of the Constitution with fundamental rights, the rule of law and democracy based on appropriate checks and balances and protection of minorities against the rule of the majority.
Katere ukrepe je sprejela Komisija v zvezi z madžarsko ustavo in njeno skladnostjo s členi 2, 6 in 7 PEU, skupnimi demokratičnimi ustavnimi načeli in pravili o volilni pravici za volitve v Evropski parlament?
What action has the Commission taken in relation to the Hungarian Constitution and its compatibility with Articles 2, 6 and 7 TEU, common democratic constitutional principles and the rules on voting rights for EP elections?
Katere naknadne ukrepe sprejema sedaj, ko je ustava sprejeta in podpisana?
What follow-up action is it taking now that the Constitution has been approved and signed?
Kateri ukrepi bi bili po mnenju Komisije potrebni, če se izkaže, da madžarska ustava ne spoštuje temeljnih pravic in vrednot, zapisanih v pogodbah?
What action does the Commission believe would be appropriate in the event that it is shown that the Hungarian Constitution does not respect the fundamental rights and values enshrined in the Treaties?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000138/2011
Question for oral answer O-000138/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Volilna pravica nedržavljanov Latvije na lokalnih volitvah
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Voting rights for non-citizens of Latvia in local elections
Po ponovni vzpostavitvi neodvisnosti je bilo latvijsko državljanstvo povrnjeno le tistim, ki so državljanstvo že imeli pred letom 1940, in njihovim potomcem.
After the restoration of independence, only citizens of the pre-1940 Latvia and their descendants had their Latvian citizenship restored.
Preostali lahko državljanstvo pridobijo le z naturalizacijo, do katere nekateri nimajo pravice.
Others are entitled to obtain citizenship only through naturalisation and some persons are not entitled to be naturalised.
Med letoma 1995 in 2009 je bilo naturaliziranih le 132.000 oseb.
Only around 132 000 persons were naturalised between 1995 and 2009.
1.1.2010 je bilo v Latviji 358.000 nedržavljanov, kar pomeni 16 % celotnega prebivalstva.
As of 1.1.2010, there remained around 358 000 non-citizens, representing around 16% of the total population.
Odbor ZN za človekove pravice, Odbor ZN za odpravo rasne diskriminacije, Parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope, Kongres lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti Sveta Evrope, komisar za človekove pravice Sveta Evrope, Evropska komisija proti rasizmu in nestrpnosti ter Parlamentarna skupščina organizacije OVSE so predlagali, naj se nedržavljanom omogoči udeležba na lokalnih volitvah.
The UN Human Rights Committee, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe, the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly have recommended making it possible for non-citizens to participate in local elections.
V resoluciji o izčrpnem spremljevalnem poročilu Komisije o pripravljenosti na članstvo EU z dne 11. marca 2004 je Evropski parlament predlagal, naj latvijske oblasti preučijo možnost, da bi nedržavljanom, ki že dolgo prebivajo v državi, dovolili sodelovanje na lokalnih volitvah.
In the resolution on the comprehensive monitoring report by the Commission on the state of preparedness for EU membership of 11 March 2004 the European Parliament proposed that the Latvian authorities envisage the possibility of allowing non-citizens who are long-time inhabitants to take part in local government elections.
22. aprila 2009 je Evropski parlament sprejel resolucijo o odločitvah Odbora za peticije v parlamentarnem letu 2008, v katerem je izrazil zaskrbljenost zaradi številnih peticij, naslovljenih na Odbor za peticije, ki so pozivale, naj se nedržavljanom Latvije s stalnim prebivališčem v tej državi dodeli pravica do udeležbe na lokalnih volitvah.
On 22 April 2009 the European Parliament adopted the resolution on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the year 2008, in which concern was expressed about the large number of petitions received by the Committee on Petitions seeking voting rights for resident non-citizens of Latvia in local elections.
Ali se Komisija strinja z zgoraj navedenim in s predlogi Evropskega parlamenta, ki se do danes še niso uresničili?
Does the Commission agree with the abovementioned, and so far unfulfilled, recommendations of the European Parliament?
Kako se je Komisija lotila zadeve, da bi spremljala uresničevanje predlogov Parlamenta?
How did the Commission address the issue in order to follow up the recommendations of the European Parliament?
Ali Komisija podrobno spremlja in spodbuja ureditev statusa "nedržavljanov" Latvije, od katerih so se mnogi rodili v Latviji?
Does the Commission monitor closely and encourage the regularisation of the status of ‘non’-citizens in Latvia, many of whom were born in Latvia?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi pomanjkanje demokracije v Latviji lahko pomenilo očitno nevarnosti resne kršitve načel demokracije ter spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin?
Does the Commission agree that the democratic deficit in Latvia may represent a clear risk of a serious breach of the principles of democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000139/2011
Question for oral answer O-000139/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Kampanja proti splavu na Madžarskem, ki jo financira EU
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Anti-abortion campaign in Hungary funded by the EU
Madžarska je 18. aprila 2011 sprejela novo ustavo, ki človeško življenje varuje že od spočetja, kar pomeni, da je s tem na Madžarskem ogrožena pravica žensk do splava.
On 18 April 2011, Hungary adopted a new Constitution that protects human life from the moment of conception, marking a first step in a gradual questioning of the right of women to have an abortion in Hungary.
Sedanja zakonodaja splav do 12. tedna nosečnosti dovoljuje.
The current law on abortion allows an abortion up to the 12th week.
Čeprav vodilna stranka nenehno ponavlja, da prepoved splava ne pride v poštev, nevladne organizacije, kot je Madžarska unija za civilne svoboščine, trdijo, da nova ustava odpira pot prihodnjim spremembam zakonodaje.
Although the ruling party has repeatedly said that a ban on abortion was not an option, non-governmental organisations, such as the Hungarian Civil Liberties’ Union, have said that the new Constitution opens the way for a future change of the law.
Vlada je nedavno naredila korak naprej in začela kampanjo na državni ravni, imenovano Ravnovesje v družini + ravnovesje na delu = ravnovesje na svetu.
The government recently went a step further by launching a national campaign called ‘Balance in the family + balance at work = balance in the world’.
PUSTITE ME ŽIVETI.“ Promocijski spot dodaja, da je na Madžarskem tisoče otrok letno žrtev splava.
The advertisement adds that ‘every year in Hungary thousands of children are victims of abortion’.
V tem spotu se pojavi zastava Evropske unije in sklicevanje na program EU za socialno vključevanje PROGRESS.
The European Union flag is on this advertisement as well as a reference to the EU’s PROGRESS programme for social inclusion.
Madžarska vlada je dala tudi izjavo za javnost, v kateri navaja, da se kampanje za izboljšanje ozaveščenosti financirajo iz programa PROGRESS.
The Hungarian government has also declared in an official statement that the awareness-raising campaigns are funded by PROGRESS.
Evropska unija je tako uradno povezana s to kampanjo, kar daje državljanom občutek, da podpira gibanja proti splavu.
The European Union is hence officially linked to this campaign, giving citizens the impression that the European Union supports anti-abortion movements.
Ali Komisija ve, da se sredstva programa PROGRESS rabijo za financiranje kampanje proti splavu?
Is the Commission aware of the fact that the PROGRESS funds are being used to finance an anti-abortion campaign?
Če je temu tako, ali lahko razloži, na osnovi česa je odobrila to financiranje in zakaj?
If so, can the Commission explain under which heading this grant is given and why it decided to give the grant?
Ali bo ukrepala proti tovrstni uporabi sredstev iz programa PROGRESS v prihodnje?
Will the Commission take steps to prevent such use of PROGRESS funds in the future?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000140/2011
Question for oral answer O-000140/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Evropski nalog za prijetje
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: European Arrest Warrant
Evropski nalog za prijetje se je izkazal za učinkovito sredstvo v boju proti čezmejnemu kriminalu, organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu.
The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) has proven to be an effective instrument in the fight against cross-border crime, organised crime and terrorism.
Vendar, kot opozarja Komisija, lahko njegov ugled in učinkovitost zamajejo poročila, da se ne uporablja na sorazmeren način ter za namene, za katere je bil vzpostavljen.
However, as pointed out by the Commission, there is potential for its reputation and effectiveness to be undermined by reports of it not being used in a proportionate manner, and within the scope for which it was intended.
– Ali Svet meni, da se je evropski nalog za prijetje pokazal kot koristen instrument in da je prinesel želene rezultate?
– Does the Council consider the EAW to have been a useful instrument and to have attained its objectives?
– Kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Svet, da bi zagotovil, da bo v prihodnje uporaba evropskega naloga za prijetje sorazmerna storjenemu kaznivemu dejanju in stroškom?
– What steps does the Council intend to take to guarantee that the future use of the EAW is proportionate in terms of the offence committed and financial cost?
– Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti zakonske in upravne pravice oseb, za katere se izda evropski nalog za prijetje?
– How does the Council intend to guarantee the legal and administrative rights of those sought under an EAW?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000141/2011
Question for oral answer O-000141/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Razmere v Gorskem Karabahu
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Situation in Nagorno-Karabakh
V zadnjih mesecih je napredek v tem dolgotrajnem konfliktu v regiji Gorski Karabah boren kljub številnim nedavnim srečanjem na visoki ravni, v katerih sta se obe strani obvezali, da bosta rešili vsa pereča vprašanja o tem sporu na miroljuben način in s krepitvijo režima prekinitve ognja na spornem območju.
In recent months progress towards finding a solution to the protracted conflict in the Nagorno Karabakh region has been limited despite the number of recent high-level meetings committing both sides to resolving all contentious issues relating to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict by peaceful means and strengthening the ceasefire regime in the conflict zone.
Po nekaterih poročilih sta Armenija in Azerbajdžan kupila novo orožje.
There are reports that new armaments have been purchased by both Armenia and Azerbaijan.
Te razmere niso ugodne za dosego sprave in povzročajo povečanje napetosti po vsem južnem Kavkazu.
This atmosphere is not conducive to creating greater reconciliation and provokes increased tensions in the whole of the South Caucasus.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu o evropski sosedski politiki z dne 25. maja 2011 izrazila pripravljenost za večjo udeležbo pri dejavnostih, kjer še ni prisotna, na primer v skupini OVSE iz Minska o spopadih v Gorskem Karabahu.
The Commission, in its Communication on ENP (25 May 2011), expresses its preparedness to ‘step up its involvement in formats where it is not yet represented, e.g. the OSCE Minsk Group on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict’.
Sporočilo se tudi sklicuje na namen Evropske unije, da močneje podpre utrjevanje zaupanja in pomoč odcepljenim ozemljem, mednarodna prizadevanja in strukture, povezane s spopadi, ter ko bo ta stopnja dosežena, izvajanje poravnalnih ukrepov.
The Communication also refers to the EU's intention ‘to enhance its support for confidence-building and outreach to breakaway territories, for international efforts and structures related to the conflicts, and, once that stage is reached, for the implementation of settlements.’
Ali je visoka predstavnica in podpredsednica Komisije pripravila konkretne predloge o tem, kako namerava Evropska unija prevzeti večjo vlogo v skupini OVSE iz Minska ter okrepiti svojo podporo trajnostni rešitvi konflikta v Gorskem Karabahu?
Has the HR/VP prepared concrete proposals on how the EU intends to pursue a greater role in the OSCE Minsk Group and enhance its support for a sustainable solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict?
S katerimi ukrepi namerava Evropska unija preprečiti zaostritev konflikta?
What steps does the European Union intend to take in order to prevent any escalation of the conflict?
Ali je pripravila strategijo za nepredvidene možnosti, ko bi ena od sprtih strani prekršila dogovor o prenehanju ognja iz Biškeka?
Has the EU developed a contingency strategy should one of the conflicting parties breach the Bishkek ceasefire agreement?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000142/2011
Question for oral answer O-000142/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Postopek izbire novega generalnega direktorja Mednarodnega denarnega sklada in zunanje zastopstvo euroobmočja
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Selection process for a new Managing Director of the IMF and external representation of the Eurozone
Mednarodni denarni sklad je začel postopek izbire novega generalnega direktorja.
The IMF has now opened the selection procedure for selecting a new Managing Director.
Rok za kandidature se izteče 10. junija 2011 in izvršni odbor Mednarodnega denarnega sklada bi moral odločitev sprejeti do 30. junija 2011.
The nomination period ends on 10 June 2011 and the Executive Board of the IMF should make a decision by 30 June 2011.
Postopek izbire bi moral biti odprt in pregleden ter upoštevati zasluge.
The selection procedure should be open, merit-based and transparent.
Kandidat iz EU je že uradno vložil kandidaturo.
A candidate from an EU Member State has officially applied for the post.
Več držav članic EU in predsednik Evropske komisije so mu neodvisno drug od drugega že izrazili podporo.
Several EU Member States and the President of the European Commission have declared their backing for the candidate, independently of one another.
Ta dogodek je opozoril, da v EU in zlasti v euroobmočju še vedno ne obstaja uradni postopek imenovanja, ki bi omogočal skupni izbor kandidatov za položaje v mednarodnih finančnih institucijah.
These events have highlighted the fact that there is still no formal nomination procedure within the EU and, more particularly, within the Eurozone, for the joint selection of candidates for posts in international financial institutions.
To je le še en primer nespoštovanja člena 138 PDEU in pomanjkanja usklajenosti, kadar gre za zunanje zastopstvo EMU.
This is another example of disregard for Article 138 TFEU and of a lack of coordination when it comes to external representation of the EMU.
Euroobmočje bi bilo vplivnejše pri zastopanju svojih interesov v Mednarodnem denarnem skladu in drugih mednarodnih organih, če bi imelo eno samo zastopstvo, primerno svoji gospodarski moči.
The Eurozone would be stronger in representing its interests at the IMF and other international bodies if it had single representation commensurate with its economic weight.
Kot je izjavila ECB, bi si morala Evropa bolj prizadevati, da bi nastopala enotno, če želi učinkovito vplivati na svetovno razpravo o politikah, ki zadevajo makroekonomske, regulativne, nadzorne, pa tudi vodstvene vidike.
As the ECB has stated, ‘to effectively influence the global debate on policies covering macroeconomic, regulatory and supervisory, as well as governance, aspects, Europe is well advised to reinforce its efforts to speak with a single voice’.
Ali lahko torej Komisija odgovori na naslednja vprašanja?
Can the Commission therefore explain:
Zakaj Svetu ni predlagala sprejetja skupnega stališča o tej zadevi, kot predvideva člen 138 PDEU?
Why it has not made a proposal to the Council for the adoption of a common position on this matter, as foreseen in Article 138 TFEU?
Kdaj namerava pripraviti predlog za skupno zunanje zastopstvo euroobmočja, da bo to lahko oblikovalo enotno stališče o temah, ki so bistvenega pomena za ekonomsko in monetarno unijo?
When it will bring forward a proposal for single external representation for the Eurozone to enable it ‘to speak with one voice on issues of particular relevance to economic and monetary union’?
Ali se strinja, da bi bil primeren in tudi najpoznejši rok za tak predlog začetek veljavnosti paketa o gospodarskem vodenju?
Does it agree that a suitable deadline for such a proposal would be no later than the entry into force of the economic governance package?
Kdaj je EU na lastno pobudo sprejela ustrezne ukrepe, da bi pravočasno in učinkovito pripravila skupna stališča in dogovore, ki bi jih bilo nato mogoče predstaviti tretjim stranem na mednarodnih forumih, kot je predlagal Evropski svet v svojih sklepih z dne 11. in 12. decembra 1998?
When it is that the EU has, on its own initiative, taken the ‘necessary action to ensure a timely and effective preparation of common positions and common understandings which can be presented to third parties in international fora’ as recommended in the European Council conclusions adopted on 11 and 12 December 1998?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000143/2011
Question for oral answer O-000143/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Imenovanje generalnega direktorja Mednarodnega denarnega sklada
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Appointment of the IMF Managing Director
Trenutno poteka izbira novega generalnega direktorja Mednarodnega denarnega sklada (MDS).
The procedure for selecting the next Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund is currently underway.
To je priložnost za Evropsko unijo (EU), da podpre uporabo postopka izbire vodstva MDS, ki bo odprt, temeljil na sposobnostih in pregleden, v skladu s priporočili, ki jih je leta 2009 izdal Mednarodni monetarni in finančni odbor (CMFI) Mednarodnega denarnega sklada.
This is an opportunity for the EU to support the adoption of an 'open, merit-based and transparent process for the selection of IMF management', as recommended in 2009 by the IMF's International Monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC).
Takšna odločitev bi tudi bila v skladu z nadaljevanjem obveznosti, ki jih je sprejela skupina G20 aprila 2009, ki se je izrekla v prid opustitve načela geografske prednosti v postopku izbire.
Such a decision would also be in line with the April 2009 G20 commitment to do away with the stipulation that the IMF Managing director must be a European.
Da bi zagotovili potrebno zakonitost izbire prihodnjega vodstva MDS, morajo biti izpolnjeni trije temeljni pogoji.
If it is to be seen as properly legitimate, the selection procedure for the next IMF Managing Director needs to fulfil three basic conditions.
Predvsem je treba zagotoviti, da izbrani kandidat dobi podporo tako večine držav članic kakor glasov.
Firstly, the successful candidate must secure both a majority of voting shares and the support of a majority of the member countries.