natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Katero strategijo bo uporabil Svet, da bodo pogoji začetka veljavnosti konvencije za varno in okolju prijazno recikliranje ladij, o katerih bodo maja 2009 potekala pogajanja na diplomatski konferenci pod okriljem Mednarodne pomorske organizacije, omogočili čim prejšnje izvajanje te konvencije?
What strategy will the Council adopt to ensure that the conditions for the entry into force of the Convention for the Safe And Environmentally Sound Recycling Of Ships, which will be negotiated in May 2009 at a diplomatic conference under the auspices of the IMO, will be conducive to the earliest possible implementation of this convention?
Ali bo Svet ukrepal pred začetkom veljavnosti in učinkovitega izvajanja konvencije, da bi zagotovil prostovoljno in začasno uporabo glavnih delov konvencije?
Pending the entry into force and effective implementation of the convention, will the Council act to make sure that the major elements of the convention will be applied on a voluntary and interim basis?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0028/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0028/09
S katerimi pobudami namerava Komisija zagotoviti odpravo podstandardne prakse razstavljanja izrabljenih plovil neposredno na obali, kar jasno priporoča 170 podpisnic baselske konvencije?
What initiatives are being taken by the Commission to ensure that the substandard practice of dismantling end-of-life vessels directly on the beach is phased out, as has been clearly recommended by 170 Parties to the Basel Convention?
Ali si Komisija namerava prizadevati za učinkovit in zgoden prenos konvencije za varno in okolju prijazno recikliranje ladij, o kateri bodo maja 2009 potekala pogajanja na diplomatski konferenci pod okriljem Mednarodne pomorske organizacije, v zakonodajo EU?
Is it the Commission's intention to work towards an effective and early transposition into EU legislation of the Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, which will be negotiated in May 2009 at a diplomatic conference under the auspices of the IMO?
S katerimi pobudami v zvezi s tem namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da zgoraj omenjena konvencija Mednarodne pomorske organizacije ne bo ogrozila obstoječe ravni varstva pred škodljivimi učinki nevarnih odpadkov, kakor je določeno v uredbi (ES) št. 1013/2006 o pošiljkah odpadkov ?
What initiatives will the Commission take in this regard to ensure that the above-mentioned IMO Convention will not undermine the existing level of protection against the adverse effects of hazardous wastes as provided by the European Waste Shipment Regulation ((EC) No 1013/2006 )?
UL L 190 z dne 12.7.2006, str.
OJ L 190, 12.7.2006, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0029/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0029/09
Zadeva: Izzivi krčenja in uničevanja gozdov za spoprijemanje s podnebnimi spremembami in izgubljanjem biotske raznovrstnosti
Subject: Challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss
Ali bi Komisija lahko predstavila količinsko opredeljeno presojo vpliva politik EU na gozdove, na primer energetske (zlasti za biogoriva) in kmetijske politike ter politike o trajnostni proizvodnji in potrošnji, javnih naročilih, trgovini in razvojnem sodelovanju?
Could the Commission present a quantified evaluation of the impact on forests of EU policies such as those on energy (especially biofuels), agriculture, sustainable production and consumption, procurement, trade and development cooperation?
Ali namerava Komisija določiti stroge trajnostne zahteve za ves les in lesne proizvode, pridobljene iz gozdov?
Does the Commission plan to set high sustainability requirements for all timber and timber products sourced from forests?
Kakšne načrte ima Komisija za spoprijem ne le s krčenjem tropskih gozdov, ampak tudi z uničevanjem gozdov v tropskih območjih in v Evropski uniji?
What are the Commission's plans to address not only tropical deforestation, but also forest degradation in the tropics and the European Union too?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0030/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0030/09
Zadeva: Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 10/2008 o razvojni pomoči ES za zdravstvene storitve v podsaharski Afriki
Subject: Court of Auditors Special Report No 10/2008 on 'EC Development Assistance to Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa'
Računsko sodišče v svojem posebnem poročilu št. 10/2008 o razvojni pomoči ES za zdravstvene storitve v podsaharski Afriki ugotavlja, da je skupno financiranje, ki ga Komisija namenja zdravstvenemu sektorju, manjše od političnih obvez in primerljivih vrednosti, kljub temu, da se je Komisija obvezala k razvojnim ciljem tisočletja, in kljub zdravstveni krizi v podsaharski Afriki.
In its Special Report No 10/2008 on 'EC Development Assistance to Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa' the Court of Auditors observes that the overall funding provided by the Commission to the health sector is 'below policy commitments and benchmarks', despite the Commission’s Millennium Development Goal (MDG) commitments and the health crisis in sub-Saharan Africa.
Neposredno financiranje zdravstvenega sektorja se je zmanjšalo (s 5,1 % iz sedmega evropskega razvojnega sklada na 3,5 % iz desetega evropskega razvojnega sklada), pomoč iz splošne proračunske podpore pa je narasla, kar pa po mnenju sodišča najbrž ne vodi k usmerjanju enake količine sredstev v zdravstvo.
Direct funding for the health sector has declined (from 5.1% under the eighth EDF to 3.5% under the 10th EDF), whilst the assistance channelled via general budget support (GBS) has increased, although this, in the Court's view, 'is unlikely to lead to as much resources being channelled to health'.
Sodišče tudi opozarja, da se splošna proračunska podpora ne uporablja učinkovito za izboljšanje zdravstvenega sistema.
The Court also notes that GBS was not effectively used to improve health systems.
Kako namerava Komisija povečati prizadevanja za podporo zdravstvenemu sistemu v podsaharski Afriki?
How does the Commission plan to scale up efforts to support health systems in sub-Saharan Africa?
Ali namerava sredstva za zdravstveni sektor revidirati v vmesnem pregledu desetega evropskega razvojnega sklada?
Does the Commission intend to revise the levels of funding earmarked for the health sector during the mid-term review of the 10th EDF?
Ali bo Komisija revidirala sedanjo razdelitev sredstev med sektorsko in splošno proračunsko podporo?
Does the Commission intend to review the current allocation of resources between sector budget support and general budget support?
Bo oblikovala jasnejše smernice o tem, kdaj bi bilo treba uporabiti vsak instrument in kako jih je najbolje kombinirati?
Does the Commission intend to establish clearer guidelines on when each instrument should be utilised and how they can best be used in combination?
Kako bo Evropska komisija na sedežu in v delegacijah povečala kadrovske zmogljivosti in vire za boljšo zdravstveno strategijo v teh državah in učinkovito porabo sredstev, nakazanih v okviru Svetovnega sklada za boj proti aidsu, tuberkulozi in malariji?
How will the Commission increase its capability in terms of staff and resources, both at headquarters and at delegation level, to support its health strategy in developing countries and ensure the effectiveness of GFATM (Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria) disbursements?
Ali namerava Komisija vzpostaviti sistem za spremljanje in ocenjevanje, ki bo dejansko pokazal na njen prispevek k izvajanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja na področju zdravstva na ravni držav?
Does the Commission intend to develop a monitoring and evaluation system that will enable it to provide evidence of its contribution to the achievement of health MDGs at country level?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0031/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0031/09
Zadeva: Aprilsko vrhunsko srečanje skupine držav G 20
Subject: April G20 Summit
Na vrhunskem srečanju novembra 2008 v Washingtonu je bil sprejet akcijski načrt za spopadanje s finančno in gospodarsko krizo.
The November 2008 Washington Summit led to an action plan for dealing with the financial and economic crisis.
Finančni trgi in finančne institucije medtem še vedno občutijo resne motnje in finančne težave.
Meanwhile, financial markets and financial institutions remain severely perturbed and under financial distress.
Gospodarski položaj po svetu je vse slabši, saj se težave širijo tudi na druge države.
In this context, delivering on the Washington action plan is crucial.
Ker je uresničitev washingtonskega akcijskega načrta bistvenega pomena, si je treba na aprilskem vrhunskem srečanju skupine držav G 20 prizadevati za predvideno uresničitev kratkoročnih ukrepov akcijskega načrta, prav tako pa je treba usmerjati mednarodni dogovor o srednjeročnih in dolgoročnih ukrepih z natančnim časovnim razporedom za odločanje in izvajanje.
The April G20 Summit should therefore aim not only to deliver on short-term measures under the action plan, as expected, but must also steer towards an international agreement on the actions to be undertaken in the mid- to longer term, with a detailed timetable for decision and implementation.
Predvsem je treba:
It must deliver, in particular, on the following issues:
– določiti kratkoročne in dolgoročne ukrepe za zmanjšanje svetovnega neravnovesja,
– short- and long-term steps towards the reduction of global imbalances,
– pregledati upravljanje Mednarodnega denarnega sklada in Svetovne banke,
– revision of IMF and World Bank governance,
– izboljšati vlogo Mednarodnega denarnega sklada pri zagotavljanju večstranskega nadzora in povečanja sredstev sklada,
– improving the role of the IMF in ensuring multilateral surveillance and enhanced resources for the IMF,
– pregledati svetovni obseg finančne regulacije, s posebnim poudarkom na institucijah, instrumentih in trgih, ki trenutno niso regulirani, da bi zagotovili ustrezno regulacijo vseh sistemsko pomembnih institucij,
– review of the scope of financial regulation worldwide, with special emphasis on institutions, instruments and markets that are currently unregulated, so as to ensure that all systemically important institutions are appropriately regulated,
– pregledati upravljanje Uprave za mednarodne računovodske standarde in računovodske standarde,
– revision of governance of the IASB and accounting standards,
– pregledati modele izplačevanja nadomestil in spodbud,
– remuneration and incentive models,
– preprečiti vse večje protekcionistične težnje.
– the fight against rising protectionist tendencies.
Da bi izboljšali razmere na finančnih trgih ter preprečili dodatne negativne posledice in škodo za občutljive gospodarske razmere je treba obravnavati te in druge teme.
These and other issues need to be addressed in order to restore the situation on the financial markets and to avoid further negative spillover and damage to the fragile economic situation.
Ali se Svet strinja s temi stališči?
Does the Council share these views?
Kakšno bo sporočilo EU na aprilskem vrhunskem srečanju skupine držav G 20, predvsem glede omenjenih vprašanj?
What is the message that the EU will deliver at the G20 Summit in April, in particular on the abovementioned issues?
Kako bo EU prispevala k dnevnemu redu vrhunskega srečanja?
What will the EU’s contribution to the Summit agenda be?
Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti, da se bo skupina držav G 20 uspešno soočila z omenjenimi izzivi?
How will the Council ensure that the G20 deals successfully with the challenges outlined above?
Kako bo EU zastopana in udeležena v teh razpravah in kako bo zagotovljeno upoštevanje stališč Evropskega parlamenta?
How will the EU organise its representation and participation in these debates and ensure that the European Parliament’s views are taken on board?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0032/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0032/09
Ali se Komisija strinja s temi stališči?
Does the Commission share these views?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da se bo skupina držav G 20 uspešno soočila z omenjenimi izzivi?
How will the Commission ensure that the G20 deals successfully with the challenges outlined above?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0033/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0033/09
Zadeva: Sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu med državami Cariforuma na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi strani
Subject: Economic Partnership Agreement between the Cariforum States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part
Lahko Svet zajamči:
Can the Council ensure:
3. da bodo Cariforum in druge podregionalne skupine v razmerju do Evropske unije selektivno izvajale načelo države z največjimi ugodnostmi?
3. that MFN treatment will be applied selectively by Cariforum and other sub-regional groups to the European Union?
4. da bodo obveze na tematskih področjih, ki na enotnem trgu in gospodarstvu Caricoma še niso bila obravnavana ali v celoti izpeljana, uresničene v skladu s členom 4.3 sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu Cariforum-ES?
4. that commitments in subject areas not yet settled or fully implemented under the Caricom Single Market and Economy are implemented as per Article 4.3 of the Cariforum-EC EPA?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0034/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0034/09
Lahko Komisija zajamči:
Can the Commission ensure:
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0035/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0035/09
Zadeva: Vmesni sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Gano na drugi strani
Subject: The stepping stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Ghana, of the other part
Ali lahko Svet Evropskemu parlamentu posreduje najnovejše informacije o predvidenih datumih sklenitve »celovitega« sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu z zahodnoafriško regijo?
Can the Council update the European Parliament on the expected dates for conclusion of a ‘full’ EPA with the West African region?
Ali bo Svet zagotovil, da bo Evropski parlament poleg tega, da bo vključen v postopek privolitve, v celoti obveščen in vključen med prehodnimi pogajanji od začasnega do »celovitega« sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
Will the Council guarantee that the European Parliament, in addition to the assent procedure, will be fully informed and involved during the transitional negotiations from the interim to the ‘full’ EPA?
Kako naj bi po pričakovanjih Sveta podpis »celovitega« sporazuma dodatno spodbudil gospodarsko rast in razvoj v Gani in zahodnoafriški regiji kot celoti ter katere metode bodo uporabljene za izračun neto davčnega učinka sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
How does the Council expect the signing of a comprehensive agreement to further promote economic growth and development in Ghana, and in the region of West Africa as a whole, and what methods will be used to calculate the net fiscal impact of EPAs?
Kako bo zagotovljeno, da bo »celovit« sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu pomagal pri nadaljnjem regionalnem povezovanju?
How will it be ensured that the ‘full’ EPA will help foster regional integration?
Ali bo sklenitev „celovitega“ sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu vplivala na trgovino in gospodarstvo z ozirom na obstoj regionalne Gospodarske skupnosti zahodnoafriških držav ter obeti za monetarno unijo?
Will there be trade and economic implications for the conclusion of a ‘full’ EPA given the existence of the ECOWAS regional community and the prospect of a monetary union?
Ali se Svet strinja, da bi morali v pogajanja o sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu vključiti:
Does the Council agree that the following should be included in EPA negotiations:
pravico Gane do pregleda rezultatov začasnega sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu (začasni sporazum), ki je bil dosežen s pogajanji, in sicer brez kakršnih koli pogojev v zvezi s pogajanji o vsebini celovitega sporazuma in o vključitvi klavzule o reviziji, s katero bi bila omogočena revizija od tri do pet let po podpisu sporazuma;
the right of Ghana to revise the results of the already-negotiated interim EPA, without any conditions as regards the contents of the final EPA negotiations and the inclusion of a revision clause enabling revision three to five years after the signing of the agreement;
zavezujočo klavzulo za poglavje v sporazumu glede razvojnega sodelovanja,
a binding clause for the EPA chapter on development cooperation;
dejstvo, da bo regionalni sporazum o gospodarskim partnerstvu tudi primerno prilagodljiv, da bo upošteval posebne značilnosti ter različne potrebe in zahteve zahodnoafriških držav.
that the regional EPA will contain the necessary flexibility to take into account the specific characteristics and the diverse needs and requirements of West African countries.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0036/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0036/09
Ali lahko Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu posreduje najnovejše informacije o predvidenih datumih sklenitve „celotnega“ sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu z zahodnoafriško regijo?
Can the Commission update the European Parliament on the expected dates for conclusion of a ‘full’ EPA with the West African region?
Ali bo Komisija zagotovila, da bo Evropski parlament poleg tega, da bo vključen v postopek privolitve, v celoti obveščen in vključen med prehodnimi pogajanji od začasnega do „celovitega“ sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
Will the Commission guarantee that the European Parliament, in addition to the assent procedure, will be fully informed and involved during the transitional negotiations from the interim to the ‘full’ EPA?
Kako naj bi po pričakovanjih Komisije podpis celovitega sporazuma dodatno spodbudil gospodarsko rast in razvoj v Gani in zahodnoafriški regiji kot celoti ter katere metode bodo uporabljene za izračun neto davčnega učinka sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
How does the Commission expect the signing of a comprehensive agreement to further promote economic growth and development in Ghana, and in the region of West Africa as a whole, and what methods will be used to calculate the net fiscal impact of EPAs?
Kako bo zagotovljeno, da bo „celovit“ sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu pomagal pri nadaljnjem regionalnem povezovanju?
How will it be ensured that the ‘full’ EPA will help foster regional integration?
Ali bo sklenitev „celotnega“ sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu vplivala na trgovino in gospodarstvo z ozirom na obstoj regionalne Gospodarske skupnosti zahodnoafriških držav ter obeti za monetarno unijo?
Will there be trade and economic implications for the conclusion of a ‘full’ EPA given the existence of the ECOWAS regional community and the prospect of a monetary union?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi morali v pogajanja o sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu vključiti:
Does the Commission agree that the following should be included in EPA negotiations:
pravico Gane do pregleda rezultatov začasnega sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu (začasni sporazum), ki je bil dosežen s pogajanji, in sicer brez kakršnih koli pogojev v zvezi s pogajanji o vsebini celotnega sporazuma in o vključitvi klavzule o reviziji, s katero bi bila omogočena revizija od tri do pet let po podpisu sporazuma;
the right of Ghana to revise the results of the already-negotiated interim EPA, without any conditions as regards the contents of the final EPA negotiations and the inclusion of a revision clause enabling revision three to five years after the signing of the agreement;
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0037/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0037/09
Zadeva: o sporazumu o začasnem partnerstvu med pacifiškimi državami na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo na drugi
Subject: The Interim Partnership Agreement between the Pacific States on the one part and the European Community, on the other part
Ali se Svet strinja, da morajo ključna razvojna vprašanja za pogajanje vključevati:
Does the Council agree that the key development issues for negotiation must include:
– dovoljevanje izvoznih dajatev v razvojne namene;
– allowing export taxes for development purposes;
– ustrezno varstvo novih industrij, ki ni prisotno v začasnem sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu;
– adequate protection for infant industries that is not present in the Interim EPA;
– razprave o intelektualni lastnini za varovanje ne le zahodnih tehnoloških artefaktov, ampak tudi tradicionalnega znanja;
– intellectual property discussions that come to terms with protecting not only western technological artefacts but traditional knowledge;
– čeprav morajo biti vladna naročila pregledna, mora njihova odprtost evropskim izvajalcem doseči primerno raven, ki bo ustrezala potrebam pacifiških držav;
– the fact that, while government procurement must be transparent, its openness to European contractors must kick in at an appropriate level suitable for the needs of Pacific States;
– delovne vizume, ki morajo biti na voljo po načinu 4 za ustrezno časovno obdobje in da je treba priznati kvalifikacije, kot so skrbniki ter
– that working visas under Mode 4 must be available for adequate periods of time and that qualifications such that of carer be recognised;
Ali se Svet strinja, da mora njegov pristop poleg upoštevanja velikosti in oddaljenosti članov regij – največja je 3000-krat večja od najmanjše in število prebivalstva slednje je lahko manjše od števila zaposlenih v GD za trgovino – vključevati dostopne in izvedljive druge možnosti, ki zagotavljajo dostop do trga državam, ki se ne želijo zavezati celovitemu sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
Does the Council agree, moreover, that considering the size and remoteness of the regions members – the largest is 3 000 times bigger than the smallest, whose population is possibly smaller than the number of employees in DG TRADE –, the Council’s approach must include accessible, viable alternatives that guarantee market access for those countries not wishing to commit to the "full" EPA?
Ali bo Svet zagotovil, da bo Evropski parlament poleg tega, da je vključen v postopek privolitve, izčrpno obveščen in vključen med prehodnimi pogajanji od začasnega do celovitega sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
Will the Council guarantee that, in addition to the assent procedure, the European Parliament is fully informed and involved during the transitional negotiations from interim to "full" EPA?
Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da bo končni sporazum pomagal pri nadaljnjem regionalnem povezovanju?
How will the Council ensure that the final agreement will help to foster further regional integration?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0038/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0038/09
Ali se Komisija strinja, da morajo ključna razvojna vprašanja za pogajanje vključevati:
Does the Commission agree that the key development issues for negotiation must include:
Ali se Komisija strinja, da mora njen pristop poleg upoštevanja velikosti in oddaljenosti članov regij – največja je 3000-krat večja od najmanjše in število prebivalstva slednje je lahko manjše od števila zaposlenih v GD za trgovino – vključevati dostopne in izvedljive druge možnosti, ki zagotavljajo dostop do trga državam, ki se ne želijo zavezati celovitemu sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
Does the Commission agree, moreover, that considering the size and remoteness of the regions members – the largest is 3 000 times bigger than the smallest, whose population is possibly smaller than the number of employees in DG TRADE –, the Commission’s approach must include accessible, viable alternatives that guarantee market access for those countries not wishing to commit to the "full" EPA?
Ali bo Komisija zagotovila, da bo Evropski parlament poleg tega, da je vključen v postopek privolitve, izčrpno obveščen in vključen med prehodnimi pogajanji od začasnega do celovitega sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu?
Will the Commission guarantee that, in addition to the assent procedure, the European Parliament is fully informed and involved during the transitional negotiations from interim to "full" EPA?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bo končni sporazum pomagal pri nadaljnjem regionalnem povezovanju?
How will the Commission ensure that the final agreement will help to foster further regional integration?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0039/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0039/09