natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Evropski nalog za prijetje
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: European Arrest Warrant
Evropski nalog za prijetje se je izkazal za učinkovito sredstvo v boju proti čezmejnemu kriminalu in terorizmu.
The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) has proven to be an effective instrument in fighting cross-border crime and terrorism.
Vendar je bil njegov sloves omadeževan zaradi poročil, da se uporablja za zaslišanje namesto za pregon in izvrševanje kazni ter za lažja kazniva dejanja, ne da bi se ustrezno presodilo, ali je predaja sorazmerna, ter ne glede na človeške in finančne stroške (ki so ocenjeni na 25.000 EUR za vsak postopek predaje).
However, its reputation is tarnished by reports of it being used for questioning instead of prosecution and execution of sentences and minor offences without proper consideration of whether surrender is proportionate, notwithstanding the human and financial costs involved (estimated at EUR 25 000 per surrender procedure).
Poleg tega države članice izdajateljice ne spoštujejo vedno odločitve države članice, da evropskega naloga za prijetje ne bo izvršila iz utemeljenih razlogov, ki jih omogoča zakonodaja EU, ter ne revidirajo ali umaknejo naloga in ustreznega opozorila iz schengenskega informacijskega sistema SIS.
Furthermore, a Member State’s decision not to execute the European Arrest Warrant for valid reasons allowed by the EU legislation is not always respected by the issuing Member State in terms of reviewing or withdrawing the EAW and the corresponding alert from the SIS.
Osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, tudi nimajo možnosti ustreznega pravnega zastopanja tako v državi članici izdajateljici kot tudi v državi članici izvršiteljici.
In addition, there is no facility for adequate legal representation for persons sought under a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing Member States.
Žal so tudi razmere v zaporih v številnih državah članicah tako slabe, da resno spodkopavajo zaupanje v ustrezno ravnanje z zaporniki, na katerem temeljita evropski nalog za prijetje in okvirni sklep o premestitvi obsojenih oseb, ki bo kmalu pričel veljati.
Finally, sadly, prison conditions in many EU Member States are so poor that they seriously undermine the trust in adequate treatment of prisoners upon which the European Arrest Warrant and the soon-to-be implemented framework decision on the transfer of sentenced persons are based.
– Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da se takoj konča nesorazmerna raba evropskega naloga za prijetje, tako v pravu kot tudi v praksi?
– How is the Council going to guarantee that disproportionate use of the European Arrest Warrant is put to an immediate end both in law and practice?
– Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da imajo osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, dejansko pravico izpodbijati nalog v državi izdajateljici in v državi izvršiteljici, ter da odločitev, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, pomeni tudi odstranitev schengenskega opozorila?
– How is Council going to ensure that persons wanted under a European Arrest Warrant are going to have an effective right to challenge a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing Member States, and that a valid decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant leads to the removal of the Schengen alert?
– Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da se v Evropski uniji dvignejo standardi v kazenskem pravosodju ter da se izboljšajo razmere v zaporih, preden v to posežejo sodišča z zaustavitvijo nadaljnjih premestitev zaradi morebitnih kršitev temeljnih človekovih pravic?
– How is the Council going to ensure that criminal justice standards and prison conditions in the European Union are raised before the courts step in and block further transfers due to the possible violation of the person’s fundamental rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000120/2011
Question for oral answer O-000120/2011
Vendar je bil njegov sloves omadeževan zaradi poročil, da se uporablja za zaslišanje namesto za pregon in izvrševanje kazni ter za lažja kazniva dejanja, ne da bi se ustrezno presodilo, ali je predaja sorazmerna, ter ne glede na človeške in finančne stroške (ki so ocenjujeni na 25,000 EUR za vsak postopek predaje).
However, its reputation is tarnished by reports of it being used for questioning instead of prosecution and execution of sentences and minor offences without proper consideration of whether surrender is proportionate, notwithstanding the human and financial costs involved (estimated at EUR 25 000 per surrender procedure).
Poleg tega države članice, ki izdajo evropski nalog za prijetje, ne spoštujejo vedno odločitve države članice, da ga ne bo izvršila iz utemeljenih razlogov, ki jih omogoča zakonodaja EU, ter ne revidirajo ali umaknejo naloga in ustreznega opozorila iz schengenskega informacijskega sistema SIS.
Furthermore, a Member State’s decision not to execute the European Arrest Warrant for valid reasons allowed by the EU legislation is not always respected by the issuing Member State in terms of reviewing or withdrawing the EAW and the corresponding alert from the SIS.
Poleg tega osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, nimajo možnosti ustreznega pravnega zastopanja tako v državi članici izdajateljici kot tudi v državi članici izvršiteljici.
In addition, there is no facility for adequate legal representation for persons sought under a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing Member States.
– Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se nesorazmerna raba evropskega naloga za prijetje takoj konča, tako v pravu kot tudi v praksi?
– How is the Commission going to guarantee that disproportionate use of the European Arrest Warrant is put to an immediate end both in law and practice?
– Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da imajo osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, dejansko pravico izpodbijati nalog v državi izdajateljici in v državi izvršiteljici, ter da odločitev, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, pomeni tudi odstranitev schengenskega opozorila?
– How is Commission going to ensure that persons wanted under a European Arrest Warrant are going to have an effective right to challenge a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing Member States, and that a valid decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant leads to the removal of the Schengen alert?
– Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se v Evropski uniji dvignejo standardi v kazenskem pravosodju ter da se izboljšajo razmere v zaporih, preden v to posežejo sodišča z zaustavitvijo nadaljnjih premestitev zaradi morebitnih kršitev temeljnih človekovih pravic?
– How is the Commission going to ensure that criminal justice standards and prison conditions in the European Union are raised before the courts step in and block further transfers due to the possible violation of the person’s fundamental rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000121/2011
Question for oral answer O-000121/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Evropski nalog za prijetje
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: European Arrest Warrant
Evropski nalog za prijetje se je izkazal kot učinkovito sredstvo za boj proti čezmejnemu kriminalu in terorizmu.
The European Arrest Warrant has proven to be an effective instrument in fighting cross-border crime and terrorism.
Poleg tega država članica izdajateljica odločitve, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, ne spoštuje vedno, kar pomeni, da je oseba spet aretirana, ko prečka mejo.
Furthermore, the decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant is not always respected by the issuing Member State, meaning the person is arrested again once he or she crosses the border.
- Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da se takoj konča nesorazmerna raba evropskega naloga za prijetje, tako v pravu kot tudi v praksi?
- How is Council going to guarantee that disproportionate use of the European Arrest Warrant is put to an immediate end both in law and practice?
- Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da imajo osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, dejansko pravico izpodbijati nalog v državi izdajateljici in v državi izvršiteljici, ter da odločitev, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, pomeni tudi odstranitev schengenskega opozorila?
- How is Council going to ensure that persons wanted under a European Arrest Warrant are going to have an effective right to challenge a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing Member States, and that a decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant leads to the removal of the Schengen alert?
- Kako bo Svet zagotovil, da se v Evropski uniji dvignejo standardi v kazenskem pravosodju ter da se izboljšajo razmere v zaporih, preden v to posežejo sodišča z zaustavitvijo nadaljnjih premestitev zaradi morebitnih kršitev temeljnih človekovih pravic?
- How is Council going to ensure that criminal justice standards and prison conditions in the European Union are raised before the courts step in and block further transfers due to the possible violation of the person’s fundamental rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000122/2011
Question for oral answer O-000122/2011
Žal so tudi razmere v zaporih v številnih državah članicah EU tako slabe, da resno spodkopavajo zaupanje v ustrezno ravnanje z zaporniki, na katerem temeljita evropski nalog za prijetje in okvirni sklep o premestitvi obsojenih oseb, ki bo kmalu pričel veljati.
Finally, sadly, prison conditions in many EU Member States are so poor that they seriously undermine the trust in adequate treatment of prisoners upon which the European Arrest Warrant and the soon-to-be implemented framework decision on the transfer of sentenced persons are based.
- Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se takoj konča nesorazmerna raba evropskega naloga za prijetje, tako v pravu kot tudi v praksi?
- How is Commission going to guarantee that disproportionate use of the European Arrest Warrant is put to an immediate end both in law and practice?
- Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da imajo osebe, za katere velja evropski nalog za prijetje, dejansko pravico izpodbijati nalog v državi izdajateljici in v državi izvršiteljici, ter da odločitev, da se evropski nalog za prijetje ne izvrši, pomeni tudi odstranitev schengenskega opozorila?
- How is Commission going to ensure that persons wanted under a European Arrest Warrant are going to have an effective right to challenge a European Arrest Warrant both in the issuing and executing Member States, and that a decision not to execute a European Arrest Warrant leads to the removal of the Schengen alert?
- Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se v Evropski uniji dvignejo standardi v kazenskem pravosodju ter da se izboljšajo razmere v zaporih, preden v to posežejo sodišča z zaustavitvijo nadaljnjih premestitev zaradi morebitnih kršitev temeljnih človekovih pravic?
- How is Commission going to ensure that criminal justice standards and prison conditions in the European Union are raised before the courts step in and block further transfers due to the possible violation of the person’s fundamental rights?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000123/2011
Question for oral answer O-000123/2011
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Evropski nalog za prijetje
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: European Arrest Warrant
Ali Svet meni, da primer zoper Juliana Assangea dokazuje možnost zlorabe evropskega naloga za prijetje v politične namene?
Does the Council feel that the case against Mr Julian Assange demonstrates the possible abuse of the European Arrest Warrant for political purposes?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000124/2011
Question for oral answer O-000124/2011
Ali Komisija meni, da primer zoper Juliana Assangea dokazuje možnost zlorabe evropskega naloga za prijetje v politične namene?
Does the Commission feel that the case against Mr Julian Assange demonstrates the possible abuse of the European Arrest Warrant for political purposes?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000125/2011
Question for oral answer O-000125/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Sporazumi o ponovnem sprejemu
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Readmission agreements
Svet je v stockholmskem programu pozval Komisijo, naj predstavi oceno sporazumov EU o ponovnem sprejemu in o pogajanjih, ki potekajo.
In the Stockholm Programme, the Council asked the Commission to present an evaluation of EU readmission agreements and ongoing negotiations.
23. februarja je Komisija predstavila sporočilo o oceni sporazumov EU o ponovnem sprejemu in o prihodnji strategiji zanje.
On 23 February the Commission presented a Communication on the evaluation of, and future strategy for, EU readmission agreements.
Svet naj bi sprejel sklepe o tem sporočilu na junijskem zasedanju.
Council conclusions on this communication are to be adopted at the Council meeting in June.
Sporazume o ponovnem sprejemu kritizirajo zlasti civilna družba, zagovorniki človekovih pravic in Evropski parlament, saj ne spoštujejo človekovih pravic ponovno sprejetih oseb.
The readmission agreements have been criticised, especially by civil society, human rights practitioners and the European Parliament, for not respecting the human rights of the readmitted persons.
Načelo nevračanja je temelj mednarodnega prava človekovih pravic in ga je treba spoštovati.
The principle of non-refoulement is a cornerstone of international human rights law and must be respected.
Vendar države članice EU v letih od napadov 11. septembra 2001 dalje ne spoštujejo popolnoma tega pravila.
However, this norm has not been fully respected by the EU Member States during the years since the 9/11 attack in 2001.
Kakor je poudarila Komisija, popolni podatki o ponovnem sprejemu niso na voljo in ni mehanizma, ki bi spremljal, kaj se dogaja zatem, ko je postopek ponovnega sprejema zaključen.
As the Commission has pointed out, comprehensive data on readmissions is not available and there is no mechanism to monitor what happens to persons after their readmission is completed.
Zdi se, da je treba opraviti revizijo celotne politike EU o ponovnem sprejemu, da bi popravili njene napake.
It seems that there is a need to review the whole EU readmission policy in order to correct its flaws.
– Ali bo Svet junija predstavil revidirano politiko o ponovnem sprejemu?
– Is the Council going to present a revised readmission policy in June?
– Ali bo Svet sledil priporočilom 10 do 15 Komisije za krepitev jamstva človekovih pravic v sporazumih o ponovnem sprejemu, zlasti o spremljanju stanja ponovno sprejetih oseb in o suspenzivni klavzuli za primere kršitev temeljnih pravic?
– Is the Council going to follow the Commission's recommendations 10-15 to enhance human rights guarantees in readmission agreements, especially on monitoring the situation of persons readmitted and on a suspension clause in the event of violation of fundamental rights?
– Ali bo Svet zahteval, da se zbere več statističnih in drugih podatkov, zlasti o postopku prošnje za azil ponovno sprejetih oseb, da se vzpostavi koristna podlaga za oceno izvrševanja sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu?
– Will the Council require more statistics and data, especially about the asylum application process of a readmitted person, to be gathered in order to provide a useful basis for assessing the implementation of the readmission agreements?
– Ali bo Svet zagotovil, da bo politika o ponovnem sprejemu transparentna in da ima javnost dostop do dvostranskih izvedbenih protokolov?
– Is the Council going to ensure that the readmission policy is transparent and that the public has access to the bilateral implementation protocols?
– Kako se bo Svet odzval na druga priporočila Komisije, zlasti o oceni konkretne potrebe po nacionalni klavzuli za tretje države?
– How will the Council react to the other recommendations made by the Commission, especially on evaluating the concrete need for third-country national clauses?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000126/2011
Question for oral answer O-000126/2011
Madžarski parlament je 18. aprila 2011 potrdil besedilo nove madžarske ustave, ki jo je predsednik republike podpisal 25. aprila 2011, veljati pa bo pričela 1. januarja 2012.
On 18 April 2011 the Hungarian Parliament approved the text of the new Hungarian Constitution, which was signed by the President of the Republic on 25 April 2011 and is to enter into force on 1 January 2012.
Madžarske opozicijske stranke, madžarske, evropske in mednarodne nevladne organizacije, evropski in mednarodni organi, kot je Beneška komisija, posebni poročevalci ZN, predstavniki vlad in parlamentov držav članic ter celo generalni sekretar ZN so vsi izrazili številne resne pomisleke o postopku, ki je bil uporabljen, in o skladnosti osnutka besedila ustave s temeljnimi pravicami, pravno državo in demokracijo, ki temeljijo na ustreznih zavorah in ravnovesjih ter na zaščiti manjšin pred prevlado večine.
Hungarian opposition parties, Hungarian, European and international NGOs, European and international bodies such as the Venice Commission, UN special rapporteurs, representatives of the governments and parliaments of Member States and even the UN Secretary-General have all raised numerous serious concerns about the process followed and the compatibility of the draft text of the Constitution with fundamental rights, the rule of law and democracy based on appropriate checks and balances and protection of minorities against the rule of the majority.
Predsednik Komisije je 5. aprila 2011 na plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta zagotovil, da bo Komisija spremljala to vprašanje ter da bo preverila skladnost osnutka nove madžarske ustave z evropskimi vrednotami, načeli, pogodbami ter evropskim pravom.
On 5 April 2011 the President of the Commission gave assurances to the EP plenary that the Commission would monitor the issue and check the compatibility of the new draft Hungarian Constitution with European values, principles, treaties and law.
Predsednik madžarske vlade Viktor Orban je izjavil, da bi pristal na tako oceno EU.
The Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán, stated that he would agree to such an evaluation by the EU.
Kakšne ukrepe je sprejel Svet v zvezi z madžarsko ustavo in njeno skladnostjo s členi 2, 6 in 7 PEU, skupnimi demokratičnimi ustavnimi načeli in pravili o volilni pravici za volitve v Evropski parlament?
What action has the Council taken in relation to the Hungarian Constitution and its compatibility with Articles 2, 6 and 7 TEU, common democratic constitutional principles and the rules on voting rights for EP elections?
Ali bo spremljal izvrševanje ustave ter zagotovil, da ne krši temeljnih vrednot in načel EU, ter ali bo v primeru kršitev uporabil ustrezna sredstva, ki jih predvidevajo pogodbe?
Will it monitor the implementation of the Constitution and make sure it does not infringe fundamental EU values and principles, and will it use the appropriate mechanisms envisaged in the Treaties in the event of such an infringement?
Ali bo Svet preučil, zakaj je v novi ustavi instrument referenduma oslabljen in zakaj vanjo niso vključena zagotovila za udeležbo državljanov?
Will the Council examine why the instrument of referendum is weakened in the new Constitution and why guarantees for citizens’ participation are not included?
Kako Svet ocenjuje dejstvo, da nova ustava ne vključuje svobode informiranja in pravice do soodločanja v zvezi z okoljem, s čimer so kršene določbe iz Direktive 2003/35/ES in Aarhuške konvencije, ki jo je ratificirala tudi Madžarska?
How does the Council evaluate the fact that the new Constitution does not include environmental information freedom and participatory rights, thus violating Directive 2003/35/EC and the Aarhus Convention, which has also been ratified by Hungary?
Ali bo Svet preučil, zakaj je v novi ustavi okrnjena avtonomija posebnih varuhov pravic državljanov in so sedaj podrejeni uradu splošnega varuha človekovih pravic?
Will the Council examine why the new Constitution is reducing the autonomy of the specialised ombudsman offices by subordinating them to the general ombudsman’s office?
Ali ne gre po mnenju Sveta pri odpravi nadzornika za varstvo podatkov (ki je pristojen tudi za vprašanja o dostopnosti podatkov v javnem interesu, npr. za vprašanja preglednosti) ter vključitvi tega doslej neodvisnega organa v državno upravo za kršitev zakonodaje EU?
Does the Council not see the elimination of the office of the ombudsman for data protection (also in charge of issues concerning accessibility of data in the public interest, i.e. transparency questions) and the merger of his hitherto independent authority into the state administration as a violation of EU law?
Ali je po mnenju Sveta dejstvo, da je socialna zaščita izvzeta iz nove ustave, ki socialne pravice pogojuje z „družbeno koristnimi dejavnostmi“, skladno z zakonodajo in politiko Skupnosti?
Does the Council see it as in line with Community legislation and policy that the right to social protection has been dropped from the new Constitution while it makes the provision of social benefits conditional on ‘socially useful activities’?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000127/2011
Question for oral answer O-000127/2011
Predsednik madžarske vlade Viktor Orbán je izjavil, da bi pristal na tako oceno EU.
The Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán, stated that he would agree to such an evaluation by the EU.
Ali bo spremljala izvrševanje ustave ter zagotovila, da ne krši temeljnih vrednot in načel EU, ter ali bo v primeru kršitev uporabila ustrezna sredstva, ki jih predvidevajo pogodbe?
Will it monitor the implementation of the Constitution and make sure it does not infringe fundamental EU values and principles, and will it use the appropriate mechanisms envisaged in the Treaties in the event of such an infringement?
Ali bo Komisija preučila, zakaj je v novi ustavi instrument referenduma oslabljen in zakaj vanjo niso vključena zagotovila za udeležbo državljanov?
Will the Commission examine why the instrument of referendum is weakened in the new Constitution and why guarantees for citizens’ participation are not included?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje dejstvo, da nova ustava ne vključuje svobode informiranja in pravice do soodločanja v zvezi z okoljem, s čimer so kršene določbe iz Direktive 2003/35/ES in Aarhuške konvencije, ki jo je ratificirala tudi Madžarska?
How does the Commission evaluate the fact that the new Constitution does not include environmental information freedom and participatory rights, thus violating Directive 2003/35/EC and the Aarhus Convention, which has also been ratified by Hungary?
Ali bo Komisija preučila, zakaj je v novi ustavi okrnjena avtonomija posebnih varuhov pravic državljanov in so sedaj podrejeni uradu splošnega varuha človekovih pravic?
Will the Commission examine why the new Constitution is reducing the autonomy of the specialised ombudsman offices by subordinating them to the general ombudsman’s office?
Ali ne gre po mnenju Komisije pri odpravi nadzornika za varstvo podatkov (ki je pristojen tudi za vprašanja o dostopnosti podatkov v javnem interesu, npr. za vprašanja preglednosti) ter vključitvi tega doslej neodvisnega organa v državno upravo za kršitev zakonodaje EU?
Does the Commission not see the elimination of the office of the ombudsman for data protection (also in charge of issues concerning accessibility of data in the public interest, i.e. transparency questions) and the merger of his hitherto independent authority into the state administration as a violation of EU law?
Ali je po mnenju Komisije dejstvo, da je socialna zaščita izvzeta iz nove ustave, ki socialne pravice pogojuje z „družbeno koristnimi dejavnostmi“, skladno z zakonodajo in politiko Skupnosti?
Does the Commission see it as in line with Community legislation and policy that the right to social protection has been dropped from the new Constitution while it makes the provision of social benefits conditional on ‘socially useful activities’?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000128/2011
Question for oral answer O-000128/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Nadaljnji ukrepi na podlagi resolucije o evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (EGP) - Švici: ovire pri popolnem izvajanju notranjega trga (2009/2176(INI))
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Follow-up to the resolution on EEA-Switzerland: Obstacles with regard to the full implementation of the internal market (2009/2176(INI))