natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ne glede na to, kakšen mehanizem bo uveden, mora biti njegov glavni namen pomagati evroobmočju in državam članicam, ne še poslabšati položaja.
Whatever the mechanism put in place, the priority should be to help the euro zone and its Member States and not to further aggravate the situation.
V zvezi s tem je Parlament bolj naklonjen metodi Skupnosti.
In this regard the Parliament favours the Community method.
V sklepih z 28. in 29. oktobra je Evropski svet pozval svojega predsednika, naj si prizadeva za omejeno spremembo pogodbe, potrebno za vzpostavitev stalnega kriznega mehanizma za ohranjanje finančne stabilnosti v evroobmočju kot celoti.
In its conclusions of 28-29 October, the European Council asked its President to work towards a limited treaty change required to establish a permanent crisis mechanism to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area as a whole.
Evropski svet je predvidel udeležbo zasebnega sektorja v tem mehanizmu, na kar so se trgi že odzvali.
The way the European Council has addressed the involvement of the private sector in such a mechanism did not leave the markets unresponsive.
Ministri evroskupine so se 28. novembra 2010 dogovorili, da bo stalni mehanizem, evropski mehanizem za stabilnost, temeljil na evropskem instrumentu za finančno stabilnost in da bo lahko v posameznih primerih vključeval zasebni sektor v skladu z mednarodno prakso in prakso Mednarodnega finančnega sklada.
On 28 November 2010, the Ministers of the Euro Group agreed that the permanent mechanism, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), will be based on the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and that it may involve the private sector on a case-by-case basis in accordance with international and IMF practice.
Kaj natančno bo prinesla sprememba Pogodbe, če bo navsezadnje potrebna?
What exactly would the Treaty change imply, if a Treaty change is ultimately required?
V skladu s katerim postopkom bo sprejeta?
Under which procedure would it take place?
Ali bo novi instrument temeljil na medvladnem pristopu ali na metodi Skupnosti in kako bo financiran?
Would the new instrument be based on an intergovernmental approach or on the Community method, and how would it be funded?
Kakšne bodo vse tehnične možnosti, ob upoštevanju potrebnih pogojev?
What would all the technical options be, taking into account the necessary conditionality?
Ali bi bilo smiselno k sodelovanju v mehanizmu povabiti tudi države članice, ki še niso del evroobmočja?
Should Member States not yet part of the euro area be invited to be part of the mechanism?
Kdaj bo ta mehanizem uveden in kakšno vlogo pri tem naj bi po načrtih Komisije imel Parlament?
When would this mechanism be in place, and what role does the Commission see for the Parliament in this respect?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0200/2010
Question for oral answer O-0200/2010
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Gospodarsko upravljanje in člen 9 Lizbonske pogodbe
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Economic governance and Article 9 of the Treaty of Lisbon
Člen 9 Lizbonske pogodbe od Unije zahteva, da pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju svojih politik in dejavnosti upošteva zahteve, povezane s spodbujanjem visoke stopnje zaposlenosti, zagotavljanjem ustrezne socialne zaščite, bojem proti socialni izključenosti, visoko stopnjo izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter varovanjem zdravja ljudi.
Article 9 of the Treaty of Lisbon calls on the Union to take account of requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health in defining and implementing its policies and activities.
Poročilo, ki ga je Evropskemu svetu pred kratkim predložila Van Rompuyeva delovna skupina, vsebuje pomembne predloge za reformo sedanjega sistema makroekonomskega nadzora in usklajevanja, ki bi bistveno vplivala na področja, kot so zaposlovanje, socialno varstvo, socialna izključenost, izobraževanje, usposabljanje in zdravje ljudi.
The recent report of the Van Rompuy taskforce to the European Council contains far-reaching proposals for the reform of the existing system of macroeconomic surveillance and coordination that will have a significant impact in areas such as employment, social protection, social exclusion, education, training and human health.
Ali se Svet zaveda tega?
Does the Council acknowledge this?
Ali se Svet v zvezi s tem strinja, da morajo biti ti predlogi in posledično prihodnji zakonodajni okvir za gospodarsko upravljanje v skladu s členom 9 Lizbonske pogodbe?
Accordingly, does the Council agree that these proposals, and consequently the future legislative framework for economic governance, must be in conformity with Article 9 of the Treaty of Lisbon?
Ali je Svet ocenil družbeni vpliv in tako zagotovil, da bo ta pogoj izpolnjen?
Has the Council ensured that this is the case by means of a social impact assessment?
Če tega ni storil, ali se strinja, da je treba vseeno opraviti poglobljeno analizo vpliva predlagane zakonodaje na družbo?
If not, does the Council agree that an in-depth analysis of the social impact of the proposed legislation ought still to be conducted?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0201/2010
Question for oral answer O-0201/2010
Paket o gospodarskem upravljanju, ki ga je pred kratkim predlagala Komisija, vsebuje pomembne predloge za reformo sedanjega sistema makroekonomskega nadzora in usklajevanja, ki bi bistveno vplivala na področja, kot so zaposlovanje, socialno varstvo, socialna izključenost, izobraževanje, usposabljanje in zdravje ljudi.
The recent economic governance package proposed by the Commission contains far-reaching proposals for the reform of the existing system of macroeconomic surveillance and coordination that will have a significant impact in areas such as employment, social protection, social exclusion, education, training and human health.
Ali se Komisija zaveda tega?
Does the Commission acknowledge this?
Ali se Komisija v zvezi s tem strinja, da morajo biti ti predlogi in posledično prihodnji zakonodajni okvir za gospodarsko upravljanje v skladu s členom 9 Lizbonske pogodbe?
Accordingly, does the Commission agree that these proposals, and consequently the future legislative framework for economic governance, must be in conformity with Article 9 of the Treaty of Lisbon?
Ali je Komisija ocenila družbeni vpliv in tako zagotovila, da bo ta pogoj izpolnjen?
Has the Commission ensured that this is the case by means of a social impact assessment?
Če tega ni storila, ali se strinja, da je treba vseeno opraviti poglobljeno analizo vpliva predlagane zakonodaje na družbo?
If not, does the Commission agree that an in-depth analysis of the social impact of the proposed legislation ought still to be conducted?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0202/2010
Question for oral answer O-0202/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Prostovoljni partnerski sporazumi FLEGT s Kongom in Kamerunom ter drugi načrtovani prostovoljni partnerski sporazumi
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: FLEGT voluntary partnership agreements with Congo and Cameroon and other planned VPAs
Številne države, ki izvažajo tropski trdi les, so začele podpisovati prostovoljne partnerske sporazume z EU v okviru akcijskega načrta za uveljavljanje zakonodaje, upravljanje in trgovanje na področju gozdov (FLEGT).
Several countries that export tropical hardwood have started to sign voluntary partnership agreements (VPAs) with the EU under the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Action Plan.
S temi sporazumi bo EU zagotovila podporo za reforme upravljanja gozdov in izgradnjo zmogljivosti, vključno z izboljšanjem sledljivosti in sistemov za preverjanje zakonitosti za les in lesne proizvode.
Through these agreements, the EU will provide support for forest governance reforms and capacity building, including the implementation of traceability and legality verification systems for timber and wood-based products.
Parlament mora uradno odobriti prostovoljna partnerska sporazuma s Kamerunom in Republiko Kongo (Brazzaville).
Parliament has to give its formal assent to two VPAs, with Cameroon and the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville).
Vsi sedanji in prihodnji prostovoljni partnerski sporazumi bi morali prispevati k varstvu nedotaknjenih gozdnih pokrajin ter gozdarski sektor usmeriti v okoljsko in družbeno trajnost ter izvesti zelo potrebne postopke reforme.
All current and future VPAs should contribute to protecting intact forest landscapes, putting the forestry sector on an environmentally and socially sustainable course and implementing a much-needed reform process.
- Kakšen mehanizem bo ustanovljen, da bi zagotovili, da bodo prostovoljni partnerski sporazumi pravočasno strogo in učinkovito uveljavljeni na različnih stopnjah njihovega izvajanja?
- What mechanism will be established to ensure that the VPAs are stringently and effectively enforced in a timely manner throughout the various stages of their implementation?
Ali bo Komisija pripravila – in predstavila Parlamentu – redna poročila o napredku pri izvajanju različnih določb vseh sedanjih in prihodnjih sporazumov?
Will the Commission produce, and present to Parliament, regular progress reports on implementation of the various provisions of all current and future agreements?
- Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo lahko civilna družba, lokalno prebivalstvo in domorodna ljudstva prosto in z zaupanjem prispevali k izvajanju in uveljavljanju prostovoljnih partnerskih sporazumov ter ali bodo lahko izkoristili pravico do pritožbe?
- How will the Commission ensure that civil society, local populations and indigenous peoples are able to contribute freely and confidently to the implementation and enforcement of the VPAs and have access to rights of appeal and complaint?
Ali je Komisija izvedla neodvisno oceno sedanjega stanja človekovih pravic in varstva njihove pravice do svobode govora v državah, ki jih zadevajo prostovoljni partnerski sporazumi?
Has the Commission carried out an independent evaluation of the current human rights situation and of protection of the right to freedom of speech in countries concerned by VPAs?
Če ne, ali se Komisija zavezuje, da bo izvedla neodvisno zanesljivo oceno standardov človekovih pravic v vsaki državi prostovoljnega partnerskega sporazuma?
If not, is the Commission committed to carrying out independent reliable assessments of human rights standards in any country concerned by VPAs?
- Glede na to, da prostovoljni partnerski sporazumi neposredno finančno vplivajo na proračun EU in da se pričakuje, da bo v naslednjih letih podpisanih še več tovrstnih sporazumov, kakšna posebna in dodatna sredstva nameravajo Komisija in države članice zbrati za finančne, tehnične in človeške vire, ki bi podprli pogajanja in izvajanje teh sporazumov?
- Given the fact that VPAs have direct financial impact on the EU budget and that more VPAs are expected to be signed in the coming years, what specific and additional funding do the Commission and the Member States intend to mobilise for financial, technical, and human resources to support the negotiation and implementation of these agreements?
- Katere nove pobude je Komisija poleg teh sporazumov predvidela za boj proti obsežnemu krčenju gozdov in uničevanju naravnih gozdov ter za spodbujanje njihove zaščite?
- What new initiatives, in addition to VPAs, does the Commission envisage for combating large-scale deforestation and the degradation of natural forests, and for promoting their protection?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0203/2010
Question for oral answer O-0203/2010
Zadeva: Pobuda glede cepiva proti tuberkulozi (TBVI) - praktična izvedba strategije Evropa 2020 v pričakovanju srečanja MDG 6 do leta 2015
Subject: Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (TBVI) - practical implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy with a view to meeting MDG 6 by 2015
EU in njene države članice so veliko vložile (preko okvirnih programov 5, 6 in 7) v raziskave in inovacije, namenjene razvoju cepiv proti tuberkulozi.
The EU and its Member States have invested heavily (through Framework Programmes 5, 6 and 7) in research and innovation aimed at developing vaccines against tuberculosis.
Pobuda glede cepiva proti tuberkulozi (TBVI), partnerstvo, ki združuje več kot 40 evropskih raziskovalnih centrov, lahko na podlagi rezultatov svojega dela izdela cepiva, ki lahko zadostijo nujnim potrebam na svetovni ravni.
The Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (TBVI), a partnership bringing together more than 40 European research centres, is able to transform the results of its work into vaccines that can meet the urgent demand at global level.
Dejansko je pet let pred rokom za uresničitev razvojnih ciljev tisočletja (MDG) razširjenost tuberkuloze v svetu še vedno vzrok za zaskrbljenost.
Indeed, five years ahead of the deadline for achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the incidence of tuberculosis around the world remains a cause for concern.
Le program cepljenja, ki vključuje kampanjo cepljenja širokega obsega, bo imel pozitiven učinek.
Only a vaccination programme involving a large-scale vaccination campaign will have a positive impact.
V ta namen je pomembno spodbuditi mednarodno financiranje na osnovi obstoječih metod.
To this end, it is important to boost international funding based on existing methods.
Ker javno financiranje ne zadostuje več za izpolnjevanje potreb in izzivov v državah v razvoju, je treba nujno preučiti alternativna in inovativna sredstva financiranja.
Since public funding is no longer sufficient to meet the needs and challenges arising in developing countries, alternative and innovative means of financing must be explored as a matter of urgency.
Ali bi bilo mogoče dati na voljo rezultate našega raziskovalnega dela tuberkuloznim bolnikom po svetu – zlasti v najmanj razvitim državam – preko obstoječega modela TBVI (vzpostavljenega na zahtevo Komisije) in vključiti ta projekt v praktično izvedbo strategije EU 2020?
Would it be possible to make our R&D work available to tuberculosis sufferers around the world – in particular in the least developed countries – through the existing TBVI model (set up at the Commission’s request), and to make this project part of the practical implementation of the EU 2020 strategy?
S tem bi se okrepila pomen in vodilna vloga EU v teh državah.
This would in turn strengthen the EU’s role and leadership in those countries.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0204/2010
Question for oral answer O-0204/2010
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Kršitve svobode govora in diskriminacija zaradi spolne usmerjenosti v Litvi
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Violation of the freedom of expression and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in Lithuania
Litovski parlament je 12. novembra 2010 z glasovanjem sklenil, da bo nadaljeval obravnavo spremembe upravnega zakonika, ki uvaja nov prekršek, ki se kaznuje z globo , in sicer „javno promocijo homoseksualnih odnosov“ , ter se zavzemal za izvajanje zakona o zaščiti mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi učinki javnega obveščanja, sprejetega 14. julija 2009, ki – čeprav je bil dvakrat deležen predsedniškega veta, pa tudi kritike Evropskega parlamenta ter obsodbe nevladnih organizacij, ki se zavzemajo za človekove pravice, in organizacij, ki zastopajo lezbijke, geje, biseksualce in transseksualce – prepoveduje „informacije, ki bi spodbujale spolne odnose ali druge koncepte zakonske zveze oziroma ustvarjanja družine v drugačni obliki, kot določa ustava oziroma civilni zakonik“.
On 12 November 2010 the Lithuanian Parliament voted to proceed with the examination of an amendment to the Administrative Code establishing a new offence punishable by a fine for the ‘public promotion of homosexual relations’ and seeking to implement the ‘Law on the Protection of Minors Against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information’ adopted on 14 July 2009, which bans - despite having been vetoed twice by Lithuanian Presidents, criticised by the European Parliament , and condemned by NGOs defending human rights and LGBT organisations - ‘information that would promote sexual relations or other conceptions of concluding a marriage or creating a family other than established in the Constitution or the Civil Code’.
Ta sprememba bi resno omejila svobodo govora in izražanja, kot je javna podpora ali zavzemanje za enakopravnost oziroma pravice lezbijk, gejev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev ali nasprotovanje diskriminaciji na podlagi spola ali spolne usmerjenosti, veljala pa bi za javne prostore, vključno z mediji, kar bi utegnilo preprečiti izvedbo parad ponosa.
The amendment would seriously limit freedom of speech and expression, such as publicly supporting or campaigning for equality, LGBT rights, or against discrimination based on sex or sexual orientation, and is designed to apply for use in public places, including in the media, and may be applied to prevent LGBT pride marches from taking place.
Litovski parlament naj bi predlog spremembe preučil do 16. decembra.
The Lithuanian Parliament is expected to complete the examination of the amendment by December 16.
Vloženi so bili tudi predlogi sprememb kazenskega zakonika in parlament jih utegne obravnavati kmalu, še vedno pa je nejasna usoda zakona, ki prepoveduje „izkazovanje ali promocijo spolne usmerjenosti“ v oglaševanju, saj oblasti potrjujejo, da je ta določba napaka, ki jo je treba popraviti.
Amendments to the Penal Code have also been tabled and could be examined soon, while uncertainty surrounds a law containing a prohibition of the ‘manifestation or promotion of sexual orientation’ in advertising, as authorities affirm that this provision is a mistake to be corrected.
Komisarka je izjavila, da je „pozorno spremljala dogodke v Litvi v zvezi z zakonom o zaščiti mladoletnikov“ in da „bo tudi v prihodnje budno sledila morebitnim poskusom, da se ta zakon uporabi za diskriminacijo lezbijk, gejev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev“ .
The Commissioner stated that she had ‘been closely following the developments in Lithuania in regards to the law on the protection of minors’, and that she ‘will remain vigilant over possible attempts to use this piece of legislation to discriminate against LGBT people’ .
V nedavnem pismu evropskim poslancem iz skupine ALDE je potrdila, da „Komisija odločno zavrača vse oblike homofobije, ki so v nasprotju z vrednotami, na kateri temelji EU“, ter da bo njen „oddelek analiziral osnutek zakonodajnega besedila“ in odločil, ali „je potrebno nadaljnje ukrepanje“.
In a recent letter to ALDE MEPs, the Commissioner confirmed that ‘the Commission firmly rejects any form of homophobia, which is incompatible with the values on which the EU is founded’, and that her ‘department will be analysing the draft legislative text’ and decide ‘whether further action is appropriate’.
Ali Komisija meni, da sta predlog spremembe, če bo sprejet, in zakon o oglaševanju skladna z vrednotami iz člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in temeljnimi svoboščinami, ki jih zagotavljata Listina EU o temeljnih svoboščinah in Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, zlasti s svobodo izražanja in obveščanja ter svobodo zbiranja, pa tudi s prepovedjo diskriminacije na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti?
Does the Commission think that the draft amendment, if approved and the advertising law are compatible with the values listed in Article 2 of the TEU and the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the CFR and the ECHR, notably freedom of expression and information and freedom of assembly and with the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation?
Ali namerava predlagati evropsko strategijo (načrt) za boj proti homofobiji in diskriminaciji na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti v EU, da bo zagotovila varstvo, spoštovanje in spodbujanje temeljnih pravic?
Will the Commission propose a European strategy (roadmap) on the fight against homophobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation in the EU in order to ensure fundamental rights are protected, respected and promoted?
Od 2.000 do 10.000 litasov, kar ustreza 580 do 2.900 EUR.
from 2 000 to 10 000 Litas; 580-2 900 euros No.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0205/2010
Question for oral answer O-0205/2010
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Nujno potreben popis prebivalstva na okupiranih območjih Cipra
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Imperative need for a population census in the occupied areas of Cyprus
Rad bi vas opozoril na zelo pomembno zadevo, namreč na namero Turčije, da spremeni demografske značilnosti turške ciprske skupnosti in demokratični značaj Cipra kot celote.
I should like to focus your attention on a very crucial issue, that is to say Turkey’s plan to change the demographic character of Turkish Cypriot community and the democratic character of Cyprus as a whole.
Za povrh turški minister, ko je bil nedavno vprašan o natančnem številu prebivalcev okupiranega dela Cipra, tega ni mogel navesti.
What is more, when a Turkish Minister was recently faced with a question about the exact size of the population in the occupied part of Cyprus, he was unable to provide a precise number.
Ali je Komisija pripravljena vključiti vprašanje demografskih sprememb v severnem Cipru na svoj dnevni red in tako izvajati pritisk, da se bodo potrebne raziskave lahko začele?
Is the Commission willing to include in its agenda the issue of the demographic change in northern Cyprus and o exert pressure accordingly so the necessary investigation can be launched?
Menim, da imajo turški Ciprčani kot državljani EU pravico, da to zahtevajo.
I believe that Turkish Cypriots as EU citizens have every right to request this.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0206/2010
Question for oral answer O-0206/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Tunizija - člen 61a kazenskega zakonika
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Tunisia - Article 61a of the Penal Code
Tunizija je junija 2010 sprejela novo spremembo člena 61a kazenskega zakonika.
In June 2010 Tunisia adopted a new amendment to Article 61a of the Penal Code.
Ta določba obravnava kršitve zunanje varnosti Tunizije.
This provision deals with violations of the external security of Tunisia.
Kriminalizira vse osebe, ki imajo posredne ali neposredne stike z agenti tuje države, tuje institucije ali organizacije, da bi jih spodbudili k vplivu na temeljne interese Tunizije in njeno gospodarsko varnost.
It criminalizes ‘any persons who, directly or indirectly, have contacts with agents of a foreign country, foreign institution or organization with the aim of inciting them to prejudice the vital interests of Tunisia and its economic security’.
Kdor je obtožen teh dejanj, ga lahko doleti kazen od pet do dvajset let zapora.
Persons convicted of these charges could face a sentence of five to twenty years of imprisonment.
Ta sprememba kazenskega zakonika bi utegnila omogočiti preganjanje in zapiranje zagovornikov človekovih pravic, ki sodelujejo s tujimi organizacijami.
This amendment to the Penal Code might allow the prosecution and imprisonment of human rights activists who cooperate with foreign organisations.
Ali Komisija meni, da nove zakonodajne določbe nasprotujejo členu 2 pridružitvenega sporazuma med Tunizijo in EU iz leta 1995, ki določa, da je vodilo za domačo in mednarodno politiko obeh strani spoštovanje demokratičnih načel in temeljnih pravic?
Is the Commission of the view that this legal provision is compatible with Article 2 of the 1995 Association Agreement between Tunisia and the EU, which stipulates that respect for democratic principles and fundamental rights must guide the two parties' domestic and international policies?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0207/2010
Question for oral answer O-0207/2010
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Kršitve svobode govora in diskriminacija zaradi spolne usmerjenosti v Litvi
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Violation of the freedom of expression and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in Lithuania