natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali bo Komisija podprla ali si prizadevala za spremembo sedanje dvojne uporabe izvoznih mehanizmov, da bi vzpostavila strožji nadzor, večjo preglednost ravnanja podjetij in držav članic ter ad hoc omejitve izvoza, kadar pride pri izvozu tehnologije IKT iz EU do pomislekov glede človekovih pravic?
Will the Commission support, or push for, changes to the current dual-use export mechanism in order to establish stronger oversight by the Commission, more transparency from both businesses and Member States, and ad hoc export restrictions to address human rights concerns related to EU exports of ICTs?
Ali Komisija lahko potrdi, da nameščanje zaposlenih v Siriji, ki ga izvajajo družbe s sedežem v EU, ni zajeto z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 428/2009 z dne 5. maja 2009, temveč s Skupnimi ukrepi Sveta z dne 22. junija 2000 za nadzor tehnične pomoči v zvezi z nekaterimi vrstami vojaške uporabe?
Can the Commission confirm that the deployment of employees in Syria by EU-based companies is not covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009, but by the Council Joint Action of 22 June 2000 concerning the control of technical assistance related to certain military end-uses?
Ali se lahko Komisija sklicuje na Skupne ukrepe, da zaustavi nadaljnjo tehnično pomoč sirski vladi?
Can and will the Commission invoke the Joint Action to block further technical assistance to the Syrian government?
S katerimi ukrepi bosta Komisija in italijanska vlada zagotovili, da center za spremljanje, ki ga podjetje Area SpA postavlja v Damasku, ne bo dokončan ali postal operativen?
What action will the Commission take, together with the Italian government, to ensure that the monitoring centre currently installed by Area SpA in Damascus will not be completed or become operational?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena začeti preiskavo na ravni EU glede vloge in/ali sokrivde podjetij IKT pri kršitvah človekovih pravic v Tuniziji, Egiptu, Libiji, Bahrajnu, Siriji in Iranu?
Is the Commission willing to begin an EU inquiry into the role and/or complicity of EU-based ICT companies in human rights violations in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, Syria and Iran?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da aktivna udeležba podjetij s sedežem v EU pri kršitvah človekovih pravic slabi verodostojnost skupne zunanje in varnostne politike EU?
Does the Commission agree that active involvement of EU-based companies in human rights violations undermines the credibility of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000295/2011
Question for oral answer O-000295/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Spopadanje z razmahom sladkorne bolezni v EU
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Addressing the EU diabetes epidemic
Po ocenah kar 33 milijonov državljanov EU – skoraj 10 % celotnega prebivalstva EU – trpi zaradi diabetesa.
Almost 33 million EU citizens – nearly 10% of the total EU population – are estimated to be affected by diabetes.
Poleg tega zaradi sladkorne bolezni v EU vsako leto umre 325.000 ljudi , kar pomeni, da zaradi diabetesa in povezanih zapletov vsaki dve minuti umre državljan EU.
Moreover, 325 000 deaths per year in the EU are attributed to diabetes , meaning that on average one EU citizen dies every two minutes of diabetes and related complications.
Dodatnih 32 milijonov državljanov trpi zaradi motenj glukozne tolerance in obstaja velika verjetnost, da se bo pri njih razvil diabetes.
An additional 32 million citizens are suffering from impaired glucose tolerance and have a very high probability of progressing to clinically manifest diabetes.
Število obolelih naj bi se do leta 2030 povečalo za 16 % zaradi vse bolj razširjene debelosti, staranja evropskega prebivalstva in drugih dejavnikov, ki jih je treba še odkriti in dodatno raziskati.
These figures are expected to increase by 16% by 2030 as a result of the obesity epidemic, the ageing of the European population and other factors yet to be determined on which more research is needed.
Stroški zdravljenja sladkorne bolezni za zdravstvene sisteme držav članic so izjemno visoki, saj predstavljajo več kot 10 % vseh odhodkov za zdravstvo v večini držav članic .
The costs of diabetes for the Member States’ healthcare systems are also extremely high, representing over 10% of the healthcare expenditure in most Member States .
Svet EU je Komisijo že pozval, naj razmisli o tem, kaj lahko Evropa naredi za zdravljenje kroničnih bolezni do leta 2012 .
Indeed, the Council of the EU has called upon the Commission to conduct a reflection process about what Europe can do to address chronic diseases by 2012 .
Povrhu tega je bil diabetes priznan kot ena od štirih glavnih nenalezljivih bolezni v nedavno sprejeti politični deklaraciji ZN s srečanja generalne skupščine na visoki ravni o preprečevanju in obvladovanju nenalezljivih bolezni ter v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. septembra 2011 in nenalezljivih boleznih , v kateri ta „poudarja, da je treba po priporočilu Sveta v sodelovanju z ustreznimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, tudi bolniki in zdravstvenimi delavci, oblikovati strategijo EU o kroničnih nenalezljivih boleznih, ki bo v posameznih razdelkih obravnavala štiri najpogostejše nenalezljive bolezni“.
In addition, diabetes has been recognised as one of the four main non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the recently adopted UN Political Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of NCDs and the European Parliament Resolution of 15 September 2011 on NCDs which ‘stresses the importance of establishing an EU strategy on chronic NCDs, to be followed by a Council recommendation, with individual sections dealing with the four most common NCDs’.
Glede na povedano, kakšne načrte ima Komisija za specifično in učinkovito spopadanje s sladkorno boleznijo?
Within this context, what are the Commission’s plans to specifically and effectively address diabetes?
Diabetes – The Policy Puzzle: towards benchmarking in the EU 27 (2007), http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/EU-diabetes-policy-audit-2008.pdf.
Diabetes – The Policy Puzzle: towards benchmarking in the EU 27 (2007) http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/EU-diabetes-policy-audit-2008.pdf.
Sklepi Sveta z naslovom „Inovativni pristopi h kroničnim boleznim v sistemih javnega zdravstva in zdravstvenega varstva“, 7. december 2010, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/118282.pdf.
Council conclusions “Innovative approaches for chronic diseases in public health and healthcare systems”, 7 December 2010 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/118282.pdf.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000296/2011
Question for oral answer O-000296/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Pogoji izvrševanja pripora in zaporne kazni v EU
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Detention conditions in the EU
Komisija je nedavno, na zahtevo Sveta v okviru stockholmskega programa in na podlagi številnih zahtev Evropskega parlamenta, izdala zeleno knjigo o izvrševanju kazenske zakonodaje EU na področju pripora in zaporne kazni.
Following a request by the Council in the framework of the Stockholm Programme and numerous requests by the European Parliament, the Commission recently issued a Green Paper on the application of EU criminal justice legislation in the field of detention.
Ta zelena knjiga odpira široko razpravo interesnih skupin o ukrepih EU za izboljšanje pogojev izvrševanja pripora in zaporne kazni, da bi zagotovili vzajemno zaupanje v pravosodnem sodelovanju.
The paper launches an open consultation exercise for stakeholders on EU actions for improvement of detention conditions to ensure mutual trust in judicial cooperation.
Obravnava pomembna vprašanja, kot je vpliv različnih standardov v zvezi s pogoji izvrševanja pripora in kazni zapora na izvajanje zakonodajnih instrumentov EU, kot so evropski nalog za prijetje in evropski nalog za nadzor.
It addresses critical issues such as the impact of differing standards of detention conditions on the application of EU legislative instruments, like the European Arrest Warrant and the European Supervision Order.
Obravnava tudi morebitno vlogo ukrepov EU na področjih, kot so pripor, alternativni ukrepi in pogoji izvrševanja pripora in zaporne kazni za otroke, da bi se tovrstni pogoji izboljšali po vsej Evropi.
It also addresses the possible role of EU action in such fields as pre-trial detention, alternative measures and children’s detention conditions, in order to improve the impact on detention conditions across Europe.
Priloga k zeleni knjigi poudarja številne skrbi, vezane na raznoliko stanje v državah članicah v zvezi s številom pripornikov, prenapolnjenostjo zaporov in deležem zaporske populacije, vključno z deležem pripornikov in zapornikov med otroki in tujci.
The Annexe to the Green Paper highlights a number of concerns related to the very diverse situation in Member States re numbers of pre-trial detainees, overcrowding, and the prison population rate, including the detention rates of children and non-nationals.
Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice je države članice EU večkrat obsodilo zaradi pogojev izvrševanja pripora in kazni zapora, dolžine pripora ter delovanja pravosodja, med drugim na podlagi poročil Odbora za preprečevanje mučenja Sveta Evrope.
The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly condemned EU Member States with regard to detention conditions, length of pre-trial detention and administration of justice, including on the basis of reports by the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture.
Kako namerava Svet obravnavati varovanje človekovih pravic iz Listine EU za vse zaprte osebe, in sicer v zvezi s pogoji izvrševanja pripora in kazni zapora, pomanjkanjem prostora, prenapolnjenostjo, napačno uporabo in zlorabo alternativnih ukrepov in dolgotrajnim priporom, ki so bili že večkrat predmet sodb Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice?
How does the Council intend to address the protection of the fundamental rights enshrined in the EU Charter for all persons in detention that relate to detention conditions, lack of facilities, overcrowding, misuse and abuse of alternative measures, and long pre-trial detention, that have often been the subject of rulings by the ECHR?
Kako namerava Svet obravnavati vprašanja v pristojnosti EU, ki imajo posredni ali neposredni vpliv na pogoje izvrševanja pripora ali zaporne kazni in temeljne pravice zaprtih oseb, kot so zloraba pripora in spodbujanje uporabe alternativnih ukrepov?
How does the Council intend to address the issues of EU competence that have a direct or indirect impact on detention conditions and fundamental rights of detainees, such as the abuse of pre-trial detention and the promotion of the use of alternative measures?
Kako namerava Svet obravnavati vprašanje vpliva pogojev izvrševanja pripora ali kazni zapora na izvrševanje ključnih instrumentov EU za pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah, kot sta evropski nalog za prijetje in evropski nalog za nadzor?
How does the Council intend to address the issue of the impact that detention conditions have on the application of critical EU instruments for judicial cooperation in criminal matters, like the European Arrest Warrant or the European Supervision Order?
Kaj bo storil, da zagotovi, da se sprejmejo ustrezni nadaljnji ukrepi v zvezi z zeleno knjigo Evropske komisije?
What will the Council do to ensure a proper follow-up to the European Commission Green Paper?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000297/2011
Question for oral answer O-000297/2011
Priloga k zeleni knjigi poudarja številne skrbi, vezane na raznoliko stanje v državah članicah v zvezi s številom pripornikov, prenapolnjenostjo zaporov in deležem zaporske populacije, vključno z deležem pripornikov in zapornikov med otroki in tujci.
The Annex to the Green Paper highlights a number of concerns related to the very diverse situation in Member States re numbers of pre-trial detainees, overcrowding and the prison population rate, including the detention rates of children and non-nationals.
Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice je države članice EU večkrat obsodilo zaradi pogojev izvrševanja pripora in kazni zapora, dolžine pripora ter delovanja pravosodja, med drugim na podlagi poročil Odbora za preprečevanje mučenja Sveta Evrope.
The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly condemned EU Member States with regard to detention conditions, length of pre-trial detention and the administration of justice, including on the basis of reports by the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture.
Kako namerava Komisija obravnavati varovanje človekovih pravic iz Listine EU za vse zaprte osebe, in sicer v zvezi s pogoji izvrševanja pripora in kazni zapora, pomanjkanjem prostora, prenapolnjenostjo, napačno uporabo in zlorabo alternativnih ukrepov in dolgotrajnim priporom?
How does the Commission intend to address the protection of the fundamental rights enshrined in the EU Charter for all persons in detention that relate to detention conditions, lack of facilities, overcrowding, misuse and abuse of alternative measures and long pre-trial detention?
Kako namerava Komisija obravnavati vprašanja v pristojnosti EU, ki imajo posredni ali neposredni vpliv na pogoje izvrševanja pripora ali zaporne kazni in temeljne pravice zaprtih oseb, kot so zloraba pripora in spodbujanje uporabe alternativnih ukrepov?
How does the Commission intend to address the issues of EU competence that have a direct or indirect impact on detention conditions and fundamental rights of detainees, such as the abuse of pre-trial detention and the promotion of the use of alternative measures?
Kako namerava Komisija obravnavati vprašanje vpliva pogojev izvrševanja pripora ali kazni zapora na izvrševanje ključnih instrumentov EU za pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah, kot sta evropski nalog za prijetje in evropski nalog za nadzor?
How does the Commission intend to address the issue of the impact that detention conditions have on the application of critical EU instruments for judicial cooperation in criminal matters, like the European Arrest Warrant or the European Supervision Order?
Kako bo nadalje ukrepala v skladu s svojo zeleno knjigo?
What will the Commission do to follow up its Green Paper?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000298/2011
Question for oral answer O-000298/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Evropski parlament in načelo parlamentarne avtonomije
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: European Parliament and the principle of parliamentary autonomy
Institucionalna struktura, s katero je bil ustanovljen in se ureja Evropski parlament, trenutno ni povsem v skladu z ustavnim načelom parlamentarne avtonomije.
At present the institutional structure establishing and regulating the European Parliament does not accord fully with the constitutional principle of parliamentary autonomy.
Evropski parlament ne uživa neomejene pravice organiziranja svojih zadev in zaradi te omejitve njegove svobode se razlikuje od večine, če ne od vseh parlamentarnih sistemov.
The European Parliament does not enjoy an unconstrained right to organise its own affairs, a restriction on its freedom which sets it apart from most, if not all, parliamentary systems.
V prejšnjih sklicih parlamenta, pa tudi med sedanjim mandatom je bila izkazana močna podpora prizadevanjem za rešitev tega vprašanja, zlasti kar zadeva vprašanje sedeža Evropskega parlamenta.
Strong support has been shown both in previous parliamentary terms and during the current term for efforts to resolve this issue, particularly with regard to the question of the seat of the European Parliament.
Pred petimi leti je kampanja za “en sedež” dobila veliko podporo in si zagotovila več kot milijon podpisov državljanov EU – dovolj, da bi se lahko opredelila kot pobuda evropskih državljanov – a ji na žalost ni uspelo spodbuditi razprave o tem vprašanju na medvladni konferenci leta 2007.
Five years ago, the 'one seat' campaign gained significant support, securing over one million signatures from EU citizens - enough to qualify as a European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) - but regrettably was unsuccessful in instigating a debate on the issue at the Intergovernmental Conference held in 2007.
Letos je podobna kampanja pritegnila podporo z več različnih strani v Evropskem parlamentu in na plenarnem zasedanju je bila potrjena sprememba koledarja delnih zasedanj za leti 2012 in 2013, da se vsled prizadevanj za odpravo nepotrebnih stroškov in škode za okolje zmanjša število poti v Strasbourg.
This year a similar campaign has attracted support from a wide range of sources within the European Parliament, and the plenary has approved a change to the part-session calendars for 2012 and 2013 to reduce the number of trips to Strasbourg, in an effort to cut unnecessary costs and damage to the environment.
Ta nedavna sprememba pa se ne dotakne osrednjega vprašanja, namreč, da Evropski parlament trenutno ne uživa polnih pravic pri odločanju o tem, kako najbolje organizirati svoje zadeve.
This recent change, however, does not address the central issue, which is that at present the European Parliament does not enjoy full rights to decide how best to organise its affairs.
Ali Svet soglaša, da bi moral Evropski parlament uživati popolne pravice organiziranja svojih zadev, vključno s pravico, da sam določi svoj sedež, kot velika večina parlamentov po svetu?
Does the Council agree that the European Parliament should enjoy full rights to organise its own affairs, including the right to determine its seat, like the vast majority of parliaments throughout the world?
Ali Svet soglaša, da bi bila izbira enega samega sedeža in lokacije za vse politične funkcije Parlamenta pravilen pristop v morebitni prihodnji reviziji delovnih praks Evropskega parlamenta?
Does the Council agree that the choice of a single seat and location for all its political functions would be the correct approach to adopt in any future revision of the European Parliament's working practices?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000299/2011
Question for oral answer O-000299/2011
Ali Komisija soglaša, da bi moral Evropski parlament uživati popolne pravice organiziranja svojih zadev, vključno s pravico, da sam določi svoj sedež, kot velika večina parlamentov po svetu?
Does the Commission agree that the European Parliament should enjoy full rights to organise its own affairs, including the right to determine its seat, like the vast majority of parliaments throughout the world?
Ali Komisija soglaša, da bi bila izbira enega samega sedeža in lokacije za vse politične funkcije Parlamenta pravilen pristop v morebitni prihodnji reviziji delovnih praks Evropskega parlamenta?
Does the Commission agree that the choice of a single seat and location for all its political functions would be the correct approach to adopt in any future revision of the European Parliament's working practices?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000300/2011
Question for oral answer O-000300/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Ribogojstvo v Evropi
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Aquaculture in Europe
V evropskem ribogojnem sektorju je okoli 17.000 podjetij, ki neposredno in posredno ustvarjajo približno 65.000 delovnih mest.
The European aquaculture industry has created around 17 000 firms, generating some 65 000 direct and indirect jobs.
Na svetovni ravni je povpraševanje po ribogojnih proizvodih veliko, a evropsko ribogojstvo k svetovni ribogojni proizvodnji prispeva le 2 %, medtem ko notranja poraba znaša 5 milijonov ton letno, kar pomeni, da mora dve tretjini potreb pokriti z uvozom iz tretjih držav.
In a global context of high demand for aquaculture products, the EU contributes only to 2% of the world aquaculture production, while its internal consumption amounts to more than five million tonnes a year; it consequently has to import two-thirds of the products it needs from non-EU countries.
Komisija je v nedavnem predlogu za reformo skupne ribiške politike sama priznala, da strategija za trajnostni razvoj evropskega ribogojstva, začeta leta 2002, ni dosegla pričakovanih ciljev, vendar je opozorila na pomembno vlogo tega sektorja pri zagotavljanju prehranske varnosti, razvoju zaposlovanja in zagotavljanju dobrega prostorskega načrtovanja.
In the recent proposal for a reform of the CFP, the Commission itself recognised that the Strategy for the Development of European Aquaculture, launched in 2002, had not reached the expected objective, but noted the important role of this sector in ensuring food security, developing employment and ensuring good spatial planning.
Nikjer pa v novem predlogu ni omenila potrebe po kakovostnih merilih za ribogojstvo.
The new proposal, nonetheless, does not make any reference to the need for qualitative criteria regarding aquaculture.
Prav tako prepušča razvoj ribogojstva državam članicam, čeprav je nujen evropski okvir.
It also leaves the development of aquaculture to Member States, when a European framework is strongly needed.
Kako namerava Komisija ustvariti pogoje za razvoj trajnostnega ribogojstva ob upoštevanju zakonodajnega okvira glede okoljskih pravil?
How does the Commission intend to create the conditions for the development of sustainable aquaculture, taking into account the legislative framework relating to environmental rules?
Kako namerava Komisija spodbuditi razvoj ekstenzivnega ali integriranega ribogojstva, da bi bile potrebe po ribjih beljakovinah v postopku gojenja minimalne?
How does the Commission intend to stimulate the development of an extensive or integrated aquaculture in order to minimise the requirements on fish proteins for the breeding process?
V preteklosti je ribogojski sektor že doživel veliko krizo na trgu.
In the past, the aquaculture industry suffered an important market crisis.
Sedaj je ribogojski trg pod pritiskom uvoženih, poceni in nizkokakovostnih proizvodov, za katere ne veljajo enake okoljske, socialne in sanitarne zahteve kot za evropske proizvode.
Now the aquaculture market is under the pressure from imported, cheap, low-quality products which do not respect the same environmental, social and sanitary requirements as European products.
Kako namerava Komisija preprečiti nelojalno konkurenco v okviru skupne ureditve trga?
How does the Commission intend to prevent unfair competition in the framework of the CMO?
Kakšen register znamk in kakšne sisteme certificiranja namerava Komisija uvesti za ribogojno proizvodnjo v okviru skupne ureditve trga?
What kind of label register and certification schemes for aquaculture production does the Commission intend to establish in the framework of the CMO?
Ali bi Komisija lahko tudi navedla, kakšen načrt se pripravlja za zagotovitev, da bo označevanje na uvoženih ribogojskih proizvodih ustrezno in zaupanja vredno?
And could the Commission point out what plan is being put in place to ensure that imported aquaculture products have adequate and trustworthy labelling?
Ali namerava Komisija oblikovati zakonodajni okvir, ki bo omogočil rast evropskega ribogojstva ter povečal njegovo proizvodnjo in diverzifikacijo, s tem pa zagotovil njegovo konkurenčnost na mednarodnem trgu?
Does the Commission intend to create a legislative framework aimed at allowing the growth of European aquaculture and increasing its production and diversification in order to ensure that it can compete on the international market?
Sicer je ustanovitev svetovalnega sveta za ribogojstvo hvalevredna, sprašujemo pa se, kdaj bo začel delovati, kaj bodo njegove naloge, kakšna bo njegova struktura in od kod se bo financiral?
While the proposal on the establishment of the new Advisory Council for Aquaculture is to be welcomed, when will it be implemented, and what will be its mission, its structure and its funding?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000301/2011
Question for oral answer O-000301/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Dostop do zdravstvenega varstva za nezakonite migrante
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Access to health care for irregular migrants
Z Mednarodnim paktom Združenih narodov o ekonomskih, socialnih in kulturnih pravicah, ki ga je podpisalo vseh 27 držav članic, je vsakomur priznana pravica do zdravja kot temeljna pravica.
Signed by all 27 Member States, the UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights sets out the right to health as a basic social right for everyone.