natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predsednik Evropskega parlamenta od julija 2004, Josep BORRELL FONTELLES, je v pogovoru predstavil filozofijo nove spletne strani institucije, njeno obliko in uredniške spremembe, ki jih je uvedlo njegovo osebje
In this interview, Josep Borrell Fontelles, President of the European Parliament since July 2004, describes the philosophy behind Parliament’s new website, its layout and the editorial revolutions introduced by his teams.
„Spodbujanje zanimanja za Evropo“
‘Encouraging an interest in Europe’
Kakšen je duh nove spletne strani?
How would you describe the spirit of the new site?
To je pomembno in težko delo, ki ga moramo opraviti.
It is difficult, but it is expected of us.
Sicer pa lahko vsak vidi, kakšen je obseg razprav, ki spremljajo osnutek Ustave v državah članicah.
Everyone could see the scale of the debates surrounding the draft constitution in the Member States.
To je dokazalo, da se ljudje zanimajo za Evropo in da bi jo radi razumeli.
This demonstrated that people are interested in Europe and want to understand it.
Evropski parlament mora, ker predstavlja evropske državljane, spodbujati to zanimanje za Evropo z omogočanjem dostopa do vseh svojih stališč.
Since it represents Europe’s citizens, the European Parliament has a duty to encourage this interest in Europe by providing access to all the views expressed within it.
Prvi korak je bil že dosežen s sedanjo spletno stranjo, na kateri je omogočen dostop do vseh dokumentov Parlamenta.
The first stage has already been completed with the current site, on which it is possible to consult all Parliament’s documents.
Čeprav je to mogoče, ni vedno preprosto, zlasti ne za osebe, ki ne poznajo tehničnega besedišča ali načina organizacije in delovanja naših postopkov.
However, although this is possible, it is not always easy, particularly for people who are unfamiliar with the technical vocabulary or with how our procedures are organised and how they operate.
Nova zgradba spletne strani odgovarja na 5 vprašanj
The site is structured around the answers to 5 questions
Kako nova spletna stran izpolnjuje to nalogo vodenja?
How does the new site fulfil this duty to provide guidance?
Nalogo izpolnjuje na dva dopolnjujoča se načina: najprej s svojo zgradbo, obliko in nato še z uredniško usmeritvijo.
It does so in two complementary ways: firstly by means of its structure, its layout, and secondly by the editorial line taken.
Zgradba spletne strani temelji na dveh razčlenitvah.
The site is divided into two areas.
Prva zajema pet velikih naslovov ali rubrik, od katerih vsaka odgovarja na preprosto vprašanje.
The first includes five main sections or headings, each of which answers a simple question.
Nismo osamljena zgradba na vrhu gore, temveč institucija, ki je v stalnem stiku z vsakdanjim življenjem državljanov Evropske unije in to želimo dokazati na spletni strani.
We are not an ivory tower on a mountain peak; we are an institution that is permanently in touch with the daily lives of EU citizens and we intend to convey this through the new site.
Odgovor na drugo vprašanje, „Kaj je Evropski parlament?“ se nahaja v rubriki Parlament , ki opisuje njegovo vlogo, pooblastila in organizacijo.
The second question, ‘What is the European Parliament?’ , is answered in the Parliament section, which describes its role, powers and organisation.
Tu so objavljene so tudi vse storitve, ki so na voljo državljanom, kot so peticije ali pošta državljanov, poleg tega pa so dodani naslovi enaintridesetih informacijskih uradov.
It also sets out all the services offered to citizens, such as Petitions and Correspondence with Citizens, and gives the addresses of our 31 information offices.
Tretja rubrika, Vaši poslanci , je posvečena osebam v Parlamentu: „Kdo so?“ .
The third section, Members of the European Parliament , is given over to the players in the EP: ‘who are they?’
Obiskovalcu spletne strani omogoča preprost dostop do poslancev iz njegove države ali do katerega koli od 732 poslancev.
It is very easy for visitors to the site to access information on their country’s MEPs or indeed any of the 732 Members of Parliament.
Lahko si pogleda opis poslanca, ki zajema njegov življenjepis in njegove mandate v instituciji, ter dostopa do različnih dokumentov, ki odsevajo naravo dela poslanca: parlamentarna poročila, parlamentarna vprašanja, predlogi sprememb itd.
They can consult a member’s file, which gives details of his or her career and parliamentary offices, as well as accessing the various documents which embody the very nature of an MEP’s work: parliamentary reports, parliamentary questions, amendments, etc.
Vedeti je treba, da ima evropski poslanec ogromno dela.
People must understand that MEPs work extremely hard.
Včasih se kdo norčuje v zvezi z obsegom naših dokumentov, naših besedil, vendar je treba vedeti nekaj: ne napišejo se sami!
We are teased sometimes about the volume of documents and texts that we produce: well, bear in mind that these documents do not write themselves!
So posledica naših razprav, na primer v parlamentarnih odborih, razmišljanj, izmenjav.
They are the outcome of discussions, in parliamentary committees, for example, and of reflection and exchanges.
Izboljšujejo se, ponovno se obdelujejo, da postanejo zadovoljivi, če ne za vse, pa vsaj za večino.
They are amended and reworked in order to satisfy, if not everyone, then at least the majority.
Temu rečemo demokracija.
This is what is known as democracy.
Dokumenti v rubriki z naslovom Dejavnosti odgovarjajo na najpomembnejše vprašanje: „Kaj dela Evropski parlament?“ .
These documents are found in the section entitled Activities , which answers the big question: ‘What does the European Parliament do?’
Kliknite in videli boste!
Well, click and see for yourself!
Na voljo so vsi dokumenti, razvrščeni po institucijah, vsebini, datumih, in sicer za zadnja tri zakonodajna obdobja, oz. za zadnjih petnajst let.
You can search for documents by institution, type or date and for the last three parliamentary terms, i.e. the last 15 years.
Zadnja rubrika EP v živo odgovarja na vprašanje „Kako videti, kaj se dogaja v Parlamentu?“ , prek neposrednega spremljanja dogodkov, ki potekajo v Evropskem parlamentu.
Finally, the section EP Live answers the question ‘How can we see what goes on in Parliament?’ by broadcasting events taking place in the European Parliament using the webstreaming technique.
Storitev Séance en direct (zasedanja v živo), ki je že več let prisotna na spletni strani, omogoča spremljanje razprav na plenarnih zasedanjih.
The ‘S é ance en Direct’ service, which has been available for several years, makes it possible to follow the debates in plenary.
EP v živo bo kmalu prenašal tudi pomembne predstavitve, kot se je že zgodilo pri predstavitvah kandidatov za komisarjev, kot tudi razprave odborov, tiskovne konference.
Very soon EP Live will also be broadcasting important hearings such as the confirmation hearings of nominee Commissioners, which have already been broadcast live in the past, as well as committee debates and press conferences.
Upoštevanje različnih ciljnih skupin spletne strani.
Taking account of the various types of visitor to the site
Kakšen je uredniški odziv?
What is the editorial response?
Uredniški odziv je najprej upoštevanje različnih ciljnih skupin, ki obiskujejo našo spletno stran.
The editorial response is firstly to take account of the different types of visitor to the site.
Povedano enostavneje, na eni strani imamo državljane, splošno javnost, ki jim želimo zagotoviti sveže, jasne in razumljive podatke.
To put it simply, we have, on the one hand, citizens, the wider public to whom we would like to give up-to-date, clear and comprehensible information.
Zanje je spletna stran stalni vir ustreznih in zanesljivih podatkov.
For these visitors, the site is intended to be a permanent source of relevant and reliable information.
Na drugi strani je naša spletna stran tudi uporaben pripomoček za vse, ki delajo na področju evropske problematike: uradnike, specializirane novinarje, lobiste itd.
On the other hand, our site is also intended to be a valuable tool for those working on European issues: officials, specialised journalists, lobbyists, etc.
Razumeti morate, da ti dve ciljni skupini nimata istih pričakovanj.
As you will understand, these two types of visitor to the site do not have the same expectations.
Zato je vsaka od petih rubrik razdeljena na tri področja.
That is why each of the five sections on the site is divided into three areas.
To je druga razčlenitev spletne strani.
This is the site’s second division.
Prvo področje je namenjeno državljanom v njihovem jeziku in njihovem načinu izražanja, to pomeni na čim bolj neposreden način.
The first area addresses citizens in their mother tongue and the type of language they are used to, i.e. as directly as possible.
Drugo vključuje bolj tehnične in izčrpne vsebine.
The second provides content which is more technical and exhaustive.
Tretje področje vsebuje arhive posamezne rubrike.
The last area contains the archives for each section.
Na primer, arhivi rubrike „Vaši poslanici“ združujejo vse podatke o poslancih, izvoljenih v parlament od leta 1979.
For example, the archives for ‘Members of the European Parliament’ bring together information on all MEPs elected to Parliament since 1979.
Cilj je širši javnosti pomagati, da s preprostim klikom pride z vsebine v svojem jeziku in načinu izražanja do bolj tehnične vsebine, za katero je treba zagotoviti osnovno razlago.
The objective is to allow the wider public, by means of a simple click, to move from content in their mother tongue and everyday language to content which is more technical and for which a minimum number of key terms will be explained.
Nima smisla objaviti poročila, sprejetega na plenarnem zasedanju, če ne poskrbimo za njegovo razlago.
There is no point in putting a report adopted in plenary online if no effort is made to explain it.
Katera vprašanja, težave, politična stališča obravnava?
What are the issues involved, the problems, the political positions?
Cilj področij, namenjenih državljanom, je olajšanje dostopa do dela poslancev.
The areas given over to citizens are there to enable them to access the work carried out by MEPs.
Interakcija, standardi WAI (pobuda spletne dostopnosti) in razvoj.
Interactivity, WAI standards and developments
Nova spletna stran ne ponuja nobene možnosti za izmenjavo mnenj, komentarjev ali za forum.
The new site does not offer an interactive tool such as a forum or the opportunity to post comments.
Ali ni to nenavadno za demokratično institucijo?
Isn’t this odd for a democratic institution?
To ni popolnoma res.
That is not entirely true.
Pošta državljanov, vloga peticije, iskanje dokumentov so storitve spletne izmenjave, ki so na voljo v rubriki Parlament.
Correspondence with Citizens, petitions and document requests are all services that are interactive and available online via the Parliament section.
Uvedbi komentarjev ali forumov očitno ne nasprotujemo, vendar moramo o tem razmisliti zaradi jezikovnega vprašanja.
As regards the posting of comments and forums, obviously we are not opposed to this, but the language question requires some thought.
Na internetu je moderiranje nujno potrebno, toda kako moderirati v 20 jezikih?
On the Internet, control media is indispensable, but how can we exercise control in 20 languages?
Prav tako smo vzpostavili tehnološko podporo, ki omogoča ponudbo teh interaktivnih orodij.
We also need to put in place technological media enabling us to offer interactive tools.
Na naši spletni strani smo že organizirali pogovore, delali pa bomo še naprej.
We have already organised chat rooms on our site and will continue to do so.
Potrebujemo le nekaj časa.
We just need a bit of time.
Ali nova spletna stran spoštuje standarde WAI (Web accessibility initiative)?
Does the new site conform to the WAI (Web Accessibility Initiative) standards?
V skladu z odločitvami, sprejetimi na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Lizboni leta 2002, poskuša naša spletna stran spoštovati standarde WAI in zagotavlja preprost dostop invalidnim osebam.
In compliance with the decisions taken at the 2002 Lisbon European Council, our site endeavours to meet WAI standards which guarantee convenient access to people with disabilities.
Standardi WAI so bili sprejeti veliko pred tem projektom.
The WAI standards were taken into consideration very early in the lift of the project.
Postati morajo samoumevne za uredniške skupine, na primer z doslednim povezovanjem opisov s slikami na spletni strani.
They must become automatic for editorial teams; for example, images placed on the site must invariably be accompanied by a description.
Za še večje izboljšanje iskanja preučujemo tudi možnost spletne objave različice izključno WAI spletne strani.
In order to further facilitate browsing, we are studying the possibility of putting an exclusively WAI version of the site online.
Ali bo nova spletna stran ostala takšna, kot je, ali je predviden nov razvoj?
Will the new site remain fixed or are there likely to be new developments?
Spletna stran, ki jo lahko uporabljate, ustreza koncu prve faze naše internetne obnove.
The site available to you corresponds to the end of the first phase of our Internet overhaul.
Zaradi njene oblike ni mogoče, da bi ostala takšna, kot je, saj se stalno posodablja.
Its structure rules out the possibility of standing still since it will be updated on an ongoing basis from now on.
V drugi fazi, v kateri sodelujejo skupine Evropskega parlamenta, poskušamo obogatiti uredniško ponudbo, izboljšati orodja ustvarjanja in številne dokumentarne programe, ki črpajo snov iz različnih rubrik spletne strani.
The second phase, which the European Parliament’s teams are working on, is aimed at enriching the editorial contribution and improving production tools and the numerous documentary channels which supply different areas of the site with information.
Poleg tega je vse, kar spada na področje „obogatene vsebine“, torej neposrednega ali posrednega prenosa slike s posebnimi spremnimi vsebinami, neizčrpen vir razvoja.
Moreover, everything coming within the area of ‘rich media’, i.e. the dissemination of video data flows, live or pre-recorded with specific accompanying contents, is an inexhaustible source of developments.
Prihodnje spremembe bodo nedvomno manj presenetljive, vendar pa je nova spletna stran zelo živahna.
The next set of changes will certainly be less spectacular, but this new site is very much alive.
Razvijala se bo in upam, da bo združevala vse številčnejšo javnost.
It will grow and, I hope, attract an ever increasing audience.
Vsak državljan, sam ali v skupini, se lahko obrne na Evropski parlament, ker ima pravico do peticije.
At any time, any citizen, acting either alone or in a group, may approach the European Parliament thanks to their right of petition.
Člen 255 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti določa, da imajo državljani in prebivalci Evropske unije pravico do dostopa do notranjih dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije.
Article 255 of the Treaty establishing the European Community provides that the citizens and residents of the European Union have a right of access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
Uradna stran priporočil W3C na področju standardov WAI (v angleščini)
Official website of recommendations by W3C on the WAI standards (in English)
Terorizem: potrebno je ravnovesje med svobodo posameznika in varstvom civilne družbe.
Terrorism: there must be a balance between individual freedom and the protection of civil society
Ste predsednik Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve Evropskega parlamenta .
You are the Chair of the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs .
Zakaj, na primer, Parlament zavrača prenos podatkov o letalskih potnikih ameriškim in kanadskim oblastem?
Why, for example, is Parliament opposed to the transfer of air passenger data to the American and Canadian authorities?
Cavada: Treba je razlikovati med obliko, torej izbranim zakonodajnim postopkom, in vsebino.
Cavada: It is necessary to distinguish between form – that is to say the legislative procedure chosen – and content.
V primeru sporazuma s Kanado je Parlament predvsem ugovarjal izvajanju postopka, s poudarkom, da je vsebina bistveno boljša kot v primeru sporazuma z ZDA.
In the case of the agreement with Canada, what Parliament criticised in particular was the procedure used, while emphasising that the content was significantly better than that of the agreement with the United States.
Parlament zahteva po predpisih sestavljen mednarodni sporazum, predložen v soglasje Parlamentu.
What Parliament is asking for is a formal international agreement, subject to Parliament’s assent.
Postopki, ki sta jih izbrala Svet in Komisija, niso niti pregledni niti demokratični.
The procedures chosen by the Council and the Commission are neither transparent nor democratic.
V zvezi s sporazumom, sklenjenim z ameriškimi organi, ugovarjamo tudi vsebini.
As regards the agreement concluded with the American authorities, our criticism also related to content.
Ključna beseda je „preveč“.
The key word here is ‘excessive’.
Po mnenju Parlamenta in organov za varstvo podatkov je število podatkov, ki jih zahtevajo ZDA za prenos, preveč pomembno, trajanje zadržanja predolgo, število namembnih organov previsoko in določeni cilji preštevilni, in to brez potrebnih zagotovil.
According to Parliament and the data protection authorities, the quantity of data which the United States is asking us to transfer is excessive, the time for which they are to be held is too long, the number of recipient authorities too high and the identified objectives too numerous, and all this is being laid down without the necessary guarantees.
Parlament ne nasprotuje izmenjavi podatkov, temveč vztraja pri upoštevanju evropskih načel.
Parliament is not opposed to exchanging data, but it insists that European principles be observed.
Državi ni treba vsega vedeti.
The State does not need to know everything.
Bistveno je upoštevati načelo sorazmernosti.
It is essential to respect the principle of proportionality.
Država ne nadzoruje državljanov, pač pa državljani nadzorujejo državo.
It is not the State that controls citizens but citizens who control the State.
Izogibati se je treba uvajanju ukrepov, ki se lahko sprevržejo v sistem nadzora množic.
We must avoid introducing measures which may turn out to be a system of mass surveillance.
Za ali proti biometričnim potnim listom
Biometric passports: for or against?
Eden od izumov za preprečevanje terorizma je potni list ali osebna izkaznica za optično branje.
One of the ideas put forward for preventing terrorism is machine-readable passports and identity cards.
Ti dokumenti vsebujejo biometrične podatke.
Such documents would contain biometric data.
Takšen potni list se preskuša v Franciji na letališču Roissy.
A passport of this kind has been tested in France, at Charles de Gaulle Airport.
Britanci so večinoma proti projektu nacionalne biometrične osebne izkaznice.
Most of the British public is against the idea of a biometric national identity card.
Evropska komisija je prejšnje leto predlagala, da bi evropske potne liste opremili z elementi za biometrično prepoznavanje.
Last year the European Commission proposed including biometric identifiers on European passports.
Kakšno je vaše mnenje o tem?
What is you opinion on this issue?
Cavada: Ko je Parlament glasoval o mnenju o uredbi o potnih listih za državljane Unije, je podprl uporabo biometričnih podatkov.
Cavada: When Parliament delivered its opinion in the vote on the EU citizens' passport regulation, it supported the use of biometric data.
Zavrnil pa je določbo, da bi bili del teh podatkov prstni odtisi državljanov, zbrani v čipu.
However, it refused to allow citizens’ fingerprints to be included in the data stored on chip.
V tem primeru je šlo za odločitev Sveta ministrov, ki je bila presenetljiva ne le za nas, ampak tudi za parlamente držav članic.
This decision, taken by the Council, came as a surprise not only to us, but also to the national parliaments.
Pomanjkanje preglednosti in zakonitosti je bilo očitno; ob tem vprašanju ni bilo niti javne razprave niti pravega sodelovanja poslancev.
The lack of transparency and legitimacy was clear: there has been no public debate on this issue and no real participation by MEPs.
Zahvaljujoč razširitvi področja uporabe postopka soodločanja od 1. januarja 2004 lahko Evropski parlament danes uveljavi svoj glas.
The wider scope of codecision aplying since 1 January 2004 enables the European Parliament to make its voice heard today.
Varnost in svoboda – protislovje?
Security and freedom – a contradiction?
Zdi se, da si varnostni ukrepi in svoboda posameznika včasih nasprotujejo.
It seems that security measures and freedom of the individual are sometimes contradictory.
Menite, da teroristična nevarnost lahko povzroči večjo sprejemljivost strogih varnostnih ukrepov v škodo svobodi posameznika?
Do you think that the danger of terrorism may cause attitudes to shift more in the direction of accepting strict security measures to the detriment of individual freedoms?
Ali ste, zlasti po napadih na London, opazili takšno težnjo v parlamentarnem odboru, ki mu predsedujete, v tekočih razpravah o okrepitvi in harmonizaciji zadržanja telefonskih in elektronskih komunikacij v EU?
Have you observed such a tendency in your own parliamentary committee, particularly following the attacks in London, during the ongoing discussions on the tighter control and harmonisation regarding telephone and electronic communications in the EU?
Cavada: Nedvomno med svobodo posameznika in sprejetimi ukrepi vlade za zaščito civilne družbe vlada spor.
Cavada: There is inevitably a conflict between individual freedom and measures taken by a government in order to protect civil society.
Bistveno je poiskati ravnovesje med njima.
It is essential to find a balance between the two.
Potrebujemo odprto razpravo o tem in menim, da je ključna beseda v tem smislu (kot že v primeru PNR in biometričnih podatkov) „sorazmernost“.
We need an open debate on this issue and I believe that a keyword in this context (and equally on the question of PNR and biometric data) should be ‘proportionality’.
Na seji našega odbora (LIBE) 13. julija 2005 smo o tem razpravljali z ministrom Charlesom Clarkom z britanskega predsedstva.
At the LIBE Committee meeting of 13 July 2005 our committee had the chance to debate this very point with the Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, representing the British Presidency.
Člani odbora so, zgroženi zaradi napadov na London, izrazili popolno podporo vladi Združenega kraljestva, pa tudi kritiko predvidenih ukrepov Združenega kraljestva v zvezi z bojem proti terorizmu.
Despite being horrified by the attacks on London and demonstrating their full support for the British Government, LIBE’s members were highly critical of the measures planned by the UK to combat terrorism.
Glede osnutka okvirnega sklepa o zadrževanju podatkov je Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, ki ga je na plenarnem zasedanju podprl Parlament, predlagal zavrnitev pobude.
As regards the draft framework decision on the holding of data, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, supported by Parliament in plenary, recommended that the initiative be rejected.
Poleg tega smo zahtevali presojo vpliva takšnih ukrepov britanskega predsedstva.
We also requested an impact assessment from the British Presidency on the effectiveness of such measures.
V prihodnjih tednih bomo dobili podatke, končno glasovanje o besedilu pa je predvideno za drugo septembrsko zasedanje.
We expect to receive information in the coming weeks, and the final vote on this text has been scheduled for the second session in September.
Svoboda, varnost in pravica: več pristojnosti Evropskemu parlamentu
Freedom, security and justice: more power for the European Parliament
Že večkrat ste se izrekli za okrepitev pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi z zakonitim priseljevanjem, varstvom podatkov, bojem proti terorizmu ali kazenskimi zadevami.
On several occasions you have spoken in favour of strengthening the powers of the European Parliament as regards legal immigration, data protection, the fight against terrorism, and indeed criminal matters.