natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Ukrepi EU v korist Romov
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: EU measures on Roma
Priča smo nenehnemu porastu nestrpnosti (sovraštva proti Romom) in naraščanju fizičnega nasilja nad Romi, kar se v zadnjem času dogaja v številnih državah članicah EU.
We continue to witness growing anti-Roma sentiment (anti-Gypsyism) and increased levels of physical violence directed towards the Roma, as has recently happened in a number of EU Member States.
Pogosto so storilci v rasističnih napadih, usmerjenih proti Romom in romskim soseskam, rasistične skupine, nogometni huligani, neonacisti in skrajnodesničarske skupine.
Racist groups, football hooligans, neo-Nazi and far right groups are very often identified as perpetrators of racist attacks against Roma and their neighbourhoods.
Katere ukrepe bo Svet sprejel, da bi zaščitil pravice in svoboščine Romov kot evropskih državljanov?
What measures is the Council taking to defend the rights and freedoms of Roma as European citizens?
Na kakšne načine je doslej Svet države članice že pozval, naj ukrepajo proti sovraštvu proti Romom?
What has the Council done to date in order to call on Member States to act against anti-Gypsyism?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000242/2011
Question for oral answer O-000242/2011
Katere ukrepe bo Komisija sprejela, da bi zaščitila pravice in svoboščine Romov kot evropskih državljanov?
What measures is the Commission taking to defend the rights and freedoms of Roma as European citizens?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000243/2011
Question for oral answer O-000243/2011
v imenu Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko Zadeva: Odprti internet in nevtralnost omrežja v Evropi
on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Subject: The open internet and net neutrality in Europe
Sveženj telekomunikacijskih reform EU iz leta 2009 poskuša spodbuditi konkurenčnost ter hkrati bolje razviti notranji trg.
The 2009 EU telecoms reform package aims both at promoting competition and at helping further develop the internal market.
Za uspešen zaključek tega svežnja sta po mnenju Evropskega parlamenta med pomembnimi prednostnimi nalogami odprti internet in nevtralnost omrežja.
For the European Parliament the open internet and net neutrality are important priorities for the successful conclusion of the 2009 EU telecoms reform package.
Države članice EU bi morale zakonodajo s svežnjem uskladiti do 25. maja 2011.
The EU Member States should have complied by 25 May 2011 with the 2009 EU telecoms reform package.
Kakšen je po mnenju Sveta učinek svežnja na zagotovitev odprtega interneta in nevtralnosti omrežja v Evropi?
What is the Council’s opinion on the impact of the 2009 EU telecoms reform package in ensuring an open internet and net neutrality in Europe?
Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti skupni pristop k odprtemu internetu in nevtralnosti omrežja v EU?
Furthermore, how does the Council want to ensure a common approach to open internet and net neutrality across the EU?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000244/2011
Question for oral answer O-000244/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Program Inteligentna energija - Evropa (IEE) znotraj večletnega finančnega okvira
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Intelligent Energy Europe programme (IEE) within the MFF
Evropska unija je oblikovala ambiciozen nabor zakonodajnih in strateških odločitev, s katerimi naj bi EU postala konkurenčna, trajnostna in vključujoča.
The European Union has developed an ambitious set of legislation and strategic decisions to make the EU competitive, sustainable and inclusive.
Vendar sta za vsako politično področje nujna vključenost in aktiviranje interesnih skupin na terenu, potrebni pa so tudi mehanizmi za reševanje netehničnih vprašanj in odstranjevanje tržnih ovir.
But all policies need involvement and activation of stakeholders on the ground and they need a tool which addresses non-technical issues and barriers on the markets.
Prav pri tem sta program Inteligentna energija – Evropa (IEE) ter izvajalska agencija EACI dosegla izjemen uspeh in dodano vrednost na področju obnovljive energije in energetske učinkovitosti.
In this respect the success and the added value of the Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) programme and of its Executive Agency (EACI) in the field of renewable energy and energy efficiency has been outstanding.
Vendar bi bile številne dejavnosti s področja obnovljive energije in energetske učinkovitosti nemogoče brez sofinanciranja programa IEE, to pa bi za prihodnjo energetsko politiko EU ter razvoj inovativnih trgov in novih delovnih mest pomenilo veliko izgubo.
However, without the co-funding of the IEE programme, many activities in the field of renewable energy and energy efficiency would not have been possible – a huge loss for the future of EU energy policies and the development of innovative markets and new jobs.
Ker odločno podpiramo ambiciozno, širše zastavljeno in zagotovljeno nadaljevanje izjemno pomembnega programa Inteligentna energija – Evropa, želimo, da Komisija odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
As we strongly support an ambitious, enlarged and secured follow-up of the highly important Intelligent Energy Europe programme, we would like the Commission to answer the following:
- S katerimi ukrepi namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da bosta program IEE in njegova izvedbena agencija EACI dobila njima namenjeno in vidno mesto?
- What does the Commission intend to do to ensure a dedicated and visible place for IEE and its Executive Agency EACI?
- Kako bo Komisija izboljšala naslednika programa IEE?
- How will the Commission improve the successor to the IEE programme?
- Iz katerega dela večletnega finančnega okvira se bo program financiral?
- Where in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) will the programme be funded?
- Kako se bo oblikoval institucionalni okvir za naslednika IEE?
- How will the institutional setting of the successor to the IEE be designed?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000245/2011
Question for oral answer O-000245/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Volilna pravica oseb brez državljanstva v Latviji na lokalnih volitvah
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Voting rights for Latvia's 'non-citizens' in local elections
Po ponovni vzpostavitvi neodvisnosti je bilo latvijsko državljanstvo povrnjeno le tistim, ki so ga že imeli pred letom 1940, in njihovim potomcem.
After the restoration of independence, only citizens of the pre-1940 Latvia and their descendants had their Latvian citizenship restored.
Ostali lahko državljanstvo dobijo le z naturalizacijo, do katere nimajo vsi pravice.
Other people only have the right to obtain citizenship through naturalisation and some are not eligible.
Med letoma 1995 in 2011 je bilo naturaliziranih samo 136.293 oseb.
Only 136 293 people were naturalised in 1995-2011.
1. januarja 2011 je bilo še vedno 326.735 oseb brez državljanstva (14,6% celotnega prebivalstva).
At 1 January 2011, there were still 326 735 non-citizens (14.6% of the total population).
Skoraj vse tako imenovane osebe brez državljanstva so pripadniki etničnih manjšin (ruske, beloruske, ukrajinske, poljske in litovske narodnosti ter Judje).
The people known as ‘non-citizens’ come almost entirely from ethnic minorities (ethnic Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Poles, Lithuanians, Jews).
Osebe brez državljanstva, ki predstavljajo 23,7% prebivalstva Rige, 18,9% prebivalstva Daugavpilsa, 20,5% prebivalstva Liepāje, 19,2% prebivalstva Jūrmale in 18,9% prebivalstva Ventspilsa, ne morejo sodelovati v lokalni politiki.
Non-citizens, who make up 23.7% of the population in Riga, 18.9% in Daugavpils, 20.5% in Liepāja, 19.2% in Jūrmala, 18.9% in Ventspils, cannot take part in local politics.
Ker se je volitev leta 2009 v povprečju udeležilo 53,8% volilnih upravičencev, so v nekaterih največjih latvijskih občinah zastopani interesi manj kot polovice prebivalstva.
Given the average turnout in the 2009 local elections was 53.8% of those eligible, in some of the biggest Latvian municipalities the interests of less than half of the population are represented.
Odbor ZN za človekove pravice, Odbor ZN za odpravo rasne diskriminacije, Parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope, Kongres lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti Sveta Evrope, komisar za človekove pravice Sveta Evrope, Evropska komisija proti rasizmu in nestrpnosti ter Parlamentarna skupščina organizacije OVSE so predlagali, naj se osebam brez državljanstva omogoči udeležba na lokalnih volitvah.
The UN Human Rights Committee, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe, the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly all recommended making it possible for non-citizens to participate in local elections.
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji o izčrpnem poročilu Komisije o spremljanju stanja pripravljenosti za članstvo v EU z dne 11. marca 2004 predlagal, naj latvijske oblasti preučijo možnost, da bi osebam brez državljanstva, ki že dolgo prebivajo v državi, dovolili sodelovanje na lokalnih volitvah.
In its resolution on the comprehensive monitoring report of the Commission on the state of preparedness for EU membership of 11 March 2004, Parliament proposed that the Latvian authorities consider the possibility of allowing non-citizens who are long-time inhabitants to take part in local self-government elections.
Parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 22. aprila 2009 o odločitvah Odbora za peticije v letu 2008 pozval Komisijo, naj skrbno spremlja in spodbuja pravno ureditev statusa oseb brez državljanstva v Latviji.
In its resolution on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the year 2008 of 22 April 2009, Parliament urged the Commission to closely monitor and encourage the regularisation of the status of non-citizens in Latvia.
– Kako je Komisija obravnavala zadevo, da bi spremljala upoštevanje predlogov Parlamenta?
– How did the Commission address the issue in order to follow up Parliament’s recommendations?
– Ali se Komisija strinja, da je treba skrbno spremljati položaj oseb brez državljanstva, predvsem pa ga pravilno predstaviti v poročilu o državljanstvu in poročilu o izvajanju Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah?
– Does the Commission agree that the situation of non-citizens should be closely monitored and, in particular, properly reflected in the Citizenship Report and the Report on the Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights?
– Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi demokratični deficit v Latviji lahko razkril očitno nevarnost resne kršitve načel demokracije ter spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin?
– Does the Commission agree that the democratic deficit in Latvia may reveal a clear risk of a serious breach of the principles of democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000246/2011
Question for oral answer O-000246/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Novi romunski civilni zakonik in prosto gibanje lezbijk in gejev ter biseksualnih in transseksualnih oseb
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: New Romanian Civil Code and free movement of LGBT persons
Člen 277 novega romunskega civilnega zakonika, ki je začel veljati 1. oktobra 2011, obravnava prepoved ali enakopravnost oblik zunajzakonske skupnosti z zakonsko zvezo .
Article 277 of the new Civil Code of Romania (RCC), which entered into force on 1 October 2011, deals with the ‘Prohibition or equivalence of forms of cohabitation with marriage’.
Ali se Svet strinja da:
Does the Council not think that:
- je izrecna prepoved istospolnih zakonskih zvez (člen 277(1) romunskega civilnega zakonika) ali partnerskih skupnosti oziroma njihovo nepriznavanje, če so bile sklenjene v tujini (člen 277(2) in (3) romunskega civilnega zakonika), v civilnem zakoniku ali ustavi nepotrebna in nekoristna določba, saj zadeva istospolne pare in osebe na podlagi njihove spolne usmerjenosti ter uvaja tovrstno diskriminacijo v temeljno zakonodajo države?
- the explicit prohibition of same-sex marriage (paragraph 1, Article 277 RCC) or partnership or of their recognition when contracted abroad (paragraphs 2 and 3, Article 277 RCC) in civil codes or Constitutions is an unnecessary and counterproductive provision, as it targets same-sex couples and persons on the basis of their sexual orientation and cements such discrimination in the fundamental laws of the State?
- je izrecna prepoved priznavanja istospolnih zakonskih zvez in civilnih partnerskih skupnosti med osebami nasprotnega ali istega spola, sklenjenih v tujini (člen 277(2) in (3) romunskega civilnega zakonika), čeprav so omenjene določbe o prostem gibanju (člen 277(4) romunskega civilnega zakonika), v nasprotju s temeljno pravico državljanov EU, da svoj civilni status nosijo s sabo, ko potujejo iz ene države članice v drugo, kot je 7. septembra 2010 dejala komisarka Viviane Reding v svojem govoru v Evropskem parlamentu?
- the explicit prohibition of the recognition of same-sex marriages and of civil partnerships, both of the opposite sex or same sex, contracted abroad (paragraphs 2 and 3, Article 277 RCC), regardless of the mentioning of the free movement provisions (paragraph 4, Article 277 RCC), runs counter to EU citizens’ fundamental right to carry their civil status with them when moving from Member State A to Member State B, as stated by Commissioner Reding during her speech in the EP of 7 September 2010?
- novi civilni zakonik ustvarja pravno negotovost, odstavki (1),(2) in (3) njegovega člena 277 pa so v navzkrižju z odstavkom (4) tega člena, saj bi se lahko uporaba člena 2 Direktive 2004/38/ES, v katerem so opredeljeni družinski člani (med katere sodi tudi zakonec), in člena 3 te direktive glede obveznosti, da se omogoči vstop in prebivanje, razglasila za nično ali pa bi se lahko ta člena uporabila tako, da se istospolni zakonci ali partnerji in partnerji nasprotnega spola ne bi mogli prosto gibati?
- the new Civil Code creates a situation of legal uncertainty and contradiction between paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, Article 277 RCC on the one hand and paragraph 4, Article 277 RCC on the other, as the application of Article 2 of Directive 2004/38/EC defining family members (which includes ‘spouse’) and of Article 3 on the duty of facilitation of entry and residence could be nullified or applied in a way to deny free movement of same-sex spouses and partners and to opposite-sex partners, on the basis of the recognition prohibition?
- so te določbe v nasprotju z vrednotami in duhom ustanovnih pogodb ter načelom enakosti in prepovedi diskriminacije, poleg tega pa lahko ustvarijo nestrpno in homofobno vzdušje ter lahko povečajo napetost in negativno vplivajo na pravico do prostega gibanja državljanov EU, tudi Romunov, v Evropski uniji?
- these provisions are contrary to the values and the spirit of the Treaties and of the principle of equality and non-discrimination and risk creating and intolerant and homophobic climate, as well as further tensions on, and repercussions for, the right to free movement of EU citizens, including of Romanians, in the EU?
V členu 277 romunskega civilnega zakonika je navedeno: „(1) Istospolna zakonska zveza je prepovedana.
Article 277 RCC states: ‘(1) Same-sex marriage is prohibited.
(2) Istospolne zakonske zveze, ki so bile sklenjene v tujini med romunskimi ali tujimi državljani, v Romuniji niso priznane.
(2) Same-sex marriages concluded or contracted abroad, either by Romanian or foreign citizens, are not recognised in Romania.
(3) Civilne partnerske skupnosti med osebami nasprotnega ali istega spola, ki so bile sklenjene v tujini med romunskimi ali tujimi državljani, v Romuniji niso priznane.
(3) Civil partnerships between persons of the opposite sex or same sex, concluded or contracted abroad, either by Romanian or foreign citizens, are not recognised in Romania.
(4) Predpisi o prostem gibanju državljanov iz držav članic EU in Evropskega gospodarskega prostora v Romuniji še vedno veljajo.“
(4) Legal provisions on free movement of citizens in Romania, for citizens from EU Member States and from the European Economic Area, remain applicable’.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000247/2011
Question for oral answer O-000247/2011
Ali se Komisija strinja da:
Does the Commission not think that:
- so te določbe v nasprotju z vrednotami in duhom ustanovnih pogodb ter načelom enakosti in prepovedi diskriminacije, poleg tega pa lahko ustvarijo nestrpno in homofobno vzdušje ter lahko povečajo napetost in negativno vplivajo na pravico do prostega gibanja državljanov EU, tudi Romunov, v Evropski uniji ter da bi morala proti Romuniji sprožiti postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev, s čimer bi zagotovila, da bi se direktiva v celoti spoštovala in izvajala brez diskriminacije na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti ter da bi se dosledno spoštovale temeljne pravice državljanov?
- these provisions are contrary to the values and the spirit of the Treaties and of the principle of equality and non-discrimination and risk creating and intolerant and homophobic climate, as well as further tensions on, and repercussions for, the right to free movement of EU citizens, including of Romanians, in the EU? it shall open an infringement proceeding against Romania to ensure that the directive is fully respected and applied without discriminations based on sexual orientation and that citizens’ fundamental rights are fully respected?
V členu 277 romunskega civilnega zakonika je navedeno: „(1) Istospolna zakonska zveza je prepovedana.
Art. 277 RCC states: ‘(1) Same-sex marriage is prohibited.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000248/2011
Question for oral answer O-000248/2011
v imenu Odbora za razvoj Zadeva: Poročilo EU o odgovornosti na področju financiranja za razvoj
on behalf of the Committee on Development Subject: EU Accountability Report on Financing for Development
Ker je gospodarska in finančna kriza še posebej močno prizadela države v razvoju, zlasti najrevnejše, je še toliko bolj nujno uresničiti razvojni cilj tisočletja, da bi do leta 2015 namenili 0,7% BNP za uradno razvojno pomoč.
Given that developing countries, especially the poorest, have been particularly hard-hit by the global economic and financial crisis, meeting our Millennium Development Goal target of earmarking 0.7% of GNI for official development assistance by 2015 appears more necessary than ever.
V tem trenutku za to primanjkuje 50 milijard EUR.
However, there is currently a EUR 50 billion funding gap.
Ali je stvarno še kar trditi, da ostaja EU zavezana uresničitvi zastavljenega cilja?
Is it realistic to continue claiming that the EU remains committed to meeting this target?
Če da, od kod bomo dobili dodatna sredstva?
If so, where is the extra funding to come from?
Kako bodo Svet in države članice ukrepali, da bodo pridobili ta dodatni prihodek?
What steps will the Council and the Member States take to generate this additional revenue?
Bodo države članice sprejele zavezujoče proračunske cilje za razvojne namene do leta 2015?
Will the Member States adopt binding budgetary timetables for development spending up to 2015?
Ali lahko Svet in države članice zagotovijo, da bomo v prihodnosti vse nove izzive politike, bodisi na področju zunanjih odnosov, podnebnih sprememb ali drugod, krili z novimi, dodatnimi sredstvi in da ta denar ne bo preusmerjen iz že obstoječih razvojnih sredstev in jih oškodoval?
Can the Council and the Member States give an undertaking to ensure in future that all new policy challenges, whether in the area of foreign relations, climate change or elsewhere, are covered by new and additional funds and that resources are not diverted to them to the detriment of existing development budgets?
Ali bodo Svet in države članice podprli popolno vključenost Parlamenta v prihodnji strokovni pregled razvojnega sodelovanja EU pri razvojnem odboru Organizacije za sodelovanje in razvoj?
Will the Council and the Member States back Parliament’s full involvement in the next OECD-DAC peer review of EU development cooperation?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000249/2011
Question for oral answer O-000249/2011
v imenu Odbora za razvoj Zadeva: Poročilo EU o odgovornosti na področju financiranja za razvo
on behalf of the Committee on Development Subject: EU Accountability Report on Financing for Development
Kako bodo Komisija in države članice ukrepale, da bodo pridobile ta dodatni prihodek?
What steps will the Commission and the Member States take to generate this additional revenue?
Ali lahko Komisija in države članice zagotovijo, da bomo v prihodnosti vse nove izzive politike, bodisi na področju zunanjih odnosov, podnebnih sprememb ali drugod, krili z novimi, dodatnimi sredstvi in da ta denar ne bo preusmerjen iz že obstoječih razvojnih sredstev in jih oškodoval?
Can the Commission and the Member States give an undertaking to ensure in future that all new policy challenges, whether in the area of foreign relations, climate change or elsewhere, are covered by new and additional funds and that resources are not diverted to them to the detriment of existing development budgets?
Ali bodo Komisija in države članice podprle popolno vključenost Parlamenta v prihodnji strokovni pregled razvojnega sodelovanja EU pri razvojnem odboru Organizacije za sodelovanje in razvoj?
Will the Commission and the Member States back Parliament’s full involvement in the next OECD-DAC peer review of EU development cooperation?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000250/2011
Question for oral answer O-000250/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: "Zakon nagobčnika" v Italiji
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: 'Gag Law' in Italy
V italijanskem parlamentu je v obravnavi predlog Berlusconijeve vlade o spremembi zakona o telefonskem prisluškovanju (predvsem v zvezi z merili in postopki za dovoljenje, vrste kaznivih dejanj, za katere se dovoli prisluškovanje, elektronski nadzor, trajanje dovoljenja za prisluškovanje, uporaba informacij, pridobljenih s telefonskim prisluškovanjem, v zvezi z drugimi kaznivimi dejanji, dolžnost blogerjev, da vnašajo popravke, ter izjeme za poslance, duhovnike in nadškofe) ter o omejitvi možnosti za objavo prepisov telefonskih pogovorov z uvedbo visokih kazni za medije, tudi nove medije, ki objavljajo informacije o sodnih preiskavah v času trajanja preiskav, torej v obdobju, ki v Italiji lahko traja od 3 do 6 let, včasih pa celo do 10 let.
The Italian Parliament is examining a proposal by the Berlusconi government to amend the wiretap law (notably in relation to the criteria and procedures for authorisation, the types of crimes covered, electronic surveillance, duration of wiretap authorisation, use of wiretapped information in relation to other crimes, duty of rectification for blogs and exceptions for MPs, priests and archbishops) and to limit the possibility of publishing wiretap transcriptions by severely punishing media – including new media – that carry information about judicial inquiries prior to the preliminary hearing stage, i.e. for a period which, in Italy, can range from three to six, or sometimes up to 10, years.
V Italiji novi osnutek zakona vzbuja veliko zaskrbljenost: predlagateljica je po glasovanju v odboru v znamenje protesta odstopila, Wikipedia je svojo italijansko spletno stran v znamenje protesta proti osnutku zakona in proti določbam, ki od blogerjev zahtevajo, da popravijo informacije v 48 urah samo na podlagi zahteve, ter predvidevajo kazni do 12 000 EUR (tako imenovani člen za "ubijanje blogerjev") , blokirala.
Major concerns about the new draft legislation have been raised in Italy: the draftswoman has resigned in protest after the committee vote; Wikipedia has published a blank page on its Italian website against the draft law to protest against the provision requiring blogs to rectify information within 48 hours upon simple request and sanctions up to EUR 12 000 (the so-called ‘blog-killer’ article) .