natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kako bo EU s politiko o biomasi izpolnila zahteve, ki jih je sprejela Komisija v okviru prostovoljnih sporazumov o partnerstvu o izvrševanju zakonodaje, upravljanju in trgovanju na področju gozdov (FLEGT), zaveze glede podnebnih sprememb v okviru zmanjševanja emisij zaradi krčenja in degradacije gozdov v državah v razvoju (REDD) ter zaveze iz deklaracije o biotski raznovrstnosti in razvojnem sodelovanju iz Nagoje?
How will the EU biomass policy meet the obligations accepted by the Commission under the Voluntary Partnership Agreements on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT), the climate change commitments within the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) framework and the Nagoya Declaration on Biodiversity in Development Cooperation?
Kako bo Svet zagotovil skladno politiko za zaščito gozdov in povečanje njihove odpornosti na podnebne spremembe z razvojnimi merili, ki preprečujejo negativne podnebne, okoljske in socialne posledice zaradi uporabe in proizvodnje biomase za energijo?
How will the Council ensure a coherent policy that will protect forests and increase their resilience to climate change by developing criteria that prevent negative climate, environmental and social impacts from the use of production of biomass for energy?
Ali ima Svet informacije o tem, koliko biomase za proizvodnjo energije se že uvozi in iz katerih regij se bo uvažala v bližnji prihodnosti?
Does the Council have any information as to how much biomass for energy production is already imported and from which regions it will come in the near future?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000213/2011
Question for oral answer O-000213/2011
S katerimi ukrepi namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da bo biomasa, uporabljena za energijo, trajnostno pridelana in skladna s trajnostnim upravljanjem gozdov, tako v EU kot zunaj nje?
What are the measures that the Commission intends to take to ensure that biomass used for energy is sustainable and is consistent with sustainable management of forests, both within and outside the EU?
Ali bo Komisija te vidike upoštevala v svojem prihodnjem poročilu o trajnostnih merilih za trdno biomaso in bioplin, ki ga mora pripraviti do konca leta 2011?
Will the Commission take these issues into account in its upcoming review concerning sustainability criteria for solid biomass and biogas (due by the end of 2011)?
Ali ima Komisija informacije o tem, koliko biomase za proizvodnjo energije se že uvozi in iz katerih regij bo se bo uvažala v bližnji prihodnosti?
Does the Commission have any information as to how much biomass for energy production is already imported and from which regions it will come in the near future?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000214/2011
Question for oral answer O-000214/2011
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Ogroženost javnega zdravja zaradi odpornosti na protimikrobna zdravila
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: Public health threat of antimicrobial resistance
Junija 2011 je delegacija Obora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Evropskega parlamenta obiskala Evropsko agencijo za zdravila v Londonu.
In June 2011 a delegation from Parliament’s Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety visited the European Medicines Agency in London.
Med tem obiskom sta agencija in delegacija izrazili zaskrbljenost zaradi vse večje odpornosti na protimikrobna zdravila, zlasti antibiotike.
During this visit both the Agency and the delegation expressed their concerns about the increasing resistance to antimicrobials, particularly antibiotics.
V skupnem tehničnem poročilu agencije in Evropskega centra za preprečevanje bolezni je bilo že leta 2009 ugotovljeno, da v EU zaradi okužb z bakterijami, odpornimi na številna zdravila, vsako leto umre najmanj 25.000 pacientov in da okužbe s temi bakterijami v EU povzročijo dodatne stroške zdravljenja in zmanjšanje produktivnosti v vrednosti najmanj 1,5 milijarde EUR letno .
A joint technical report from the Agency and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) had already concluded in 2009 that at least 25 000 patients in the EU die each year from infections caused by bacteria that are resistant to many medicines, and that in the EU infections caused by these bacteria result in extra healthcare costs and productivity losses of at least EUR 1.5 billion each year .
Poročilo Komisije o priporočilu Sveta iz leta 2001 in raziskava Eurobarometra iz leta 2010 navajata niz pomanjkljivosti in vrzeli pri spodbujanju preudarne uporabe protimikrobnih sredstev.
A Commission Report on the 2001 Council Recommendations and the 2010 Eurobarometer survey identified a series of shortfalls and gaps in the promotion of the prudent use of antimicrobials.
Razmere so še toliko slabše, ker je bilo v zadnjih nekaj letih odobreno le majhno število novih protimikrobnih zdravil, zaradi česar utegne biti zdravljenje okužb v prihodnje še težavnejše.
The problem is made worse by the fact that only a small number of new antimicrobials have been authorised over the past few years, a situation which may lead to infections becoming more difficult to treat in the future.
Gre za pojav, ki ima očitne čezmejne posledice.
Antimicrobial resistance is a phenomenon which clearly has cross-border implications.
Ali lahko Svet pojasni, kako se namerava s prihodnjimi pobudami EU – vključno z zakonodajnimi predlogi – spopasti s problemom odpornosti na protimikrobna zdravila, zlasti kar zadeva naslednje:
Could the Council explain how, through future EU initiatives – including legislative proposals – it intends to tackle the problem of antimicrobial resistance, in particular as regards:
1. preudarno uporabo dovoljenih protimikrobnih zdravil za ljudi in živali;
1. the prudent use of authorised antimicrobials for humans and for animals;
2. nujne spodbude za vlaganje v nova protimikrobna zdravila;
2. the need for incentives to invest in new antimicrobials;
3. raven povečanja izdatkov držav članic za javno zdravstvo zaradi odpornosti na protimikrobna zdravila?
3. the extent to which antimicrobial resistance increases public health expenditures in the Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000215/2011
Question for oral answer O-000215/2011
V skupnem tehničnem poročilu agencije in Evropskega centra za preprečevanje bolezni je bilo leta 2009 ugotovljeno, da v EU zaradi okužb z bakterijami, odpornimi na številna zdravila, vsako leto umre najmanj 25.000 pacientov in da okužbe s temi bakterijami v EU povzročijo dodatne stroške zdravljenja in zmanjšanje produktivnosti v vrednosti najmanj 1,5 milijarde EUR letno .
A joint technical report from the Agency and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) had already concluded in 2009 that at least 25 000 patients in the EU die each year from infections caused by bacteria that are resistant to many medicines, and that in the EU infections caused by these bacteria result in extra healthcare costs and productivity losses of at least EUR 1.5 billion each year .
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, kako se namerava s prihodnjimi pobudami EU – vključno z zakonodajnimi predlogi – spopasti s problemom odpornosti na protimikrobna zdravila, zlasti kar zadeva naslednje:
Could the Commission explain how, through future EU initiatives – including legislative proposals – it intends to tackle the problem of antimicrobial resistance, in particular as regards:
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000216/2011
Question for oral answer O-000216/2011
v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Zadeva: Konferenca o podnebnih spremembah v Durbanu (COP 17)
on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Subject: Climate change conference in Durban (COP 17)
Katere ukrepe je Svet sprejel, da bi zagotovil oprijemljive rezultate konference o podnebnih spremembah v Durbanu (COP 17) in predvsem resničen napredek na področju:
What steps is the Council taking to ensure that the COP 17 Climate Change Conference in Durban brings tangible results, and in particular makes concrete progress in achieving:
– dogovora o drugem ciljnem obdobju kjotskega protokola;
– agreement on the second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol;
– širšega celovitega svetovnega dogovora, ki bo vključeval vse strani, ter
– a broader comprehensive global agreement involving all parties; and
– izvajanja sporazuma iz Cancúna?
– implementation of the Cancún Agreements?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000217/2011
Question for oral answer O-000217/2011
Katere ukrepe je Komisija sprejela, da bi zagotovila oprijemljive rezultate konference o podnebnih spremembah v Durbanu (COP 17) in predvsem resničen napredek na področju:
What steps is the Commission taking to ensure that the COP 17 Climate Change Conference in Durban brings tangible results, and in particular makes concrete progress in achieving:
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000218/2011
Question for oral answer O-000218/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Pridružitev Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to Schengen
Evropski parlament je 8. junija 2011 dal zeleno luč Bolgariji in Romuniji za pridružitev k schengenskemu območju s 487 glasovi za, 77 proti in 29 vzdržanimi glasovi.
On 8 June 2011, the European Parliament decided to give the green light to Bulgaria and Romania’s accession to the Schengen area, with 487 votes in favour, 77 against and 29 abstentions.
Glasovanje je potekalo po tem, ko je Komisija predložila poročilo o napredku, v katerem je sklenila, da obe državi izpolnjujeta vsa tehnična in pravna merila za pridružitev k schengenskemu območju, vključno s politiko izdaje vizumov, sodelovanja na policijskem področju, pripravljenostjo povezati se s SIS in ga uporabljati, varovanjem podatkov in nadzorom zemeljskih, zračnih in morskih meja.
This vote took place after the Commission’s progress reports concluded that both countries met all the technical and legal criteria for joining the Schengen area, including visa issuance policy, police cooperation, readiness to connect to and use the Schengen Information System, data protection and control of land, sea and air borders.
Romunija in Bolgarija sta s podpisom Pogodbe o pristopu prejeli seznam zahtev in jih izpolnili.
By signing the Accession Treaty, Bulgaria and Romania received a list of requirements and fulfilled them.
Ali Svet meni, da je pošteno uporabiti dodatna merila, ki od začetka niso bila predvidena in ki za prejšnje pristope niso veljala?
Does the Council believe it is fair to apply extra criteria which were not foreseen from the beginning and which were not applied to the earlier accessions?
Ali Svet lahko opredeli nadaljnja merila, ki jih morata Romunija in Bolgarija izpolniti za vstop v schengensko območje?
Can the Council indicate what further criteria have to be met by Romania and Bulgaria in order for them to qualify?
Ali Svet lahko pojasni pravno podlago za ta merila?
Can the Council clarify the legal basis for these criteria?
Kaj namerava storiti Svet kot naslednje?
What are the next steps that the Council intends to take?
Kakšna je strategija in časovnica poljskega predsedstva?
What is the strategy and timetable of the Polish Presidency?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000219/2011
Question for oral answer O-000219/2011
v imenu Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve Zadeva: Evropski semester 2011 - prve izkušnje
on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Subject: European Semester 2011 - First Lessons
Po prvi izvedbi evropskega semestra so bila izdana poročila po posameznih državah, ki jih je Komisija sprejela junija in katerih namen je bil zagotoviti predhodno usmeritev za države članice glede fiskalnih in strukturnih ciljev.
The first European Semester exercise led to the release of country-specific recommendations adopted by the Commission in June and had the aim of providing ex-ante guidance to Member States on both fiscal and structural objectives.
Svet je po spremembah ta priporočila julija odobril.
These recommendations were endorsed by the Council in July after modification.
Evropski parlament želi v okviru svoje vloge – zagotavljanja kar največje preglednosti in odgovornosti na ravni Unije – spodbuditi razpravo o teh priporočilih pa tudi splošneje o rezultatu prvega dela evropskega semestra kot celote.
As part of Parliament's role of ensuring maximum transparency and accountability at the Union level, the European Parliament is eager to foster a debate on these recommendations as well as more generally on the outcome of the first instalment of the European Semester as a whole.
Kako Svet ocenjuje prvi evropski semester kot celoto?
How does the Council evaluate the first European Semester as a whole?
Ali je izpolnil pričakovanja, kar zadeva usklajevanje fiskalne in makroekonomske politike?
Did it live up to expectations in terms of coordination of fiscal and macroeconomic policies?
Katere konkretne načrte ima za izboljšanje prihodnjega cikla evropskega semestra v letu 2012?
What are your concrete plans for improvement for the coming European Semester cycle in 2012?
Ali so bile sprejete kompromisne rešitve med makroekonomskimi in fiskalnimi priporočili?
Were there trade-offs between macroeconomic and fiscal recommendations?
Kako ocenjuje pravno vzajemno delovanje med različnimi orodji, zlasti nacionalnimi programi reform ter programi za stabilnost in konvergenco?
How do you assess the legal interaction between two tools of a different nature, namely the National Reform Programmes (NRPs) and the Stability and Convergence Programmes (SCPs)?
Kako ocenjuje vzajemno delovanje med evropskim semestrom, širšimi smernicami gospodarske politike ter smernicami za zaposlovanje?
How do you assess the interaction between the European Semester and the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines (BEPG) and Employment Guidelines (EG)?
Ali Svet meni, da je spremenil priporočila na pregleden način?
Do you feel that the Council's changes to the recommendations were made in a transparent manner?
Ali so še možnosti za izboljšave v prihodnjih letih?
Do you see any room for improvement in this regard in future years?
Ali je Svet pripravljen povečati preglednost predstavitve priporočil na spletnem mestu na podlagi nacionalnih programov reform, programov za stabilnost in konvergenco ter širših smernic gospodarske politike ter njihovo oceno?
Is the Council willing to enhance transparency of the website presentation of recommendations based on the NRPs, SCPs and BEPGs, and of their assessment?
Kako ocenjuje zavzetost držav članic za evropski semester in njegovo upravljanje ter demokratično legitimnost prek vloge nacionalnih parlamentov in Evropskega parlamenta?
How would you assess the Member States' commitment to and ownership of the European Semester and to its democratic legitimacy through the role of national parliaments and the European Parliament?
Kako bo evropski semester pripomogel k izvajanju in spoštovanju nove direktive Sveta o zahtevah za proračunske okvire držav članic?
How will the European Semester assist in the implementation and enforcement of the new Council directive on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000220/2011
Question for oral answer O-000220/2011
Kako Komisija ocenjuje prvi evropski semester kot celoto?
How does the Commission evaluate the first European Semester as a whole?
Zlasti, ali namerava Komisija spremeniti postopek ali format letnega pregleda rasti?
In particular, does the Commission envisage any changes to the process or format of the Annual Growth Survey?
Ali Komisija meni, da so imele njene službe dovolj časa in virov, da bi opravile primerno in poglobljeno analizo?
Do you feel the Commission services had sufficient time and resources to provide an appropriate and thorough analysis?
Kako ocenjuje pravno vzajemno delovanje med dvema različnima orodjema, to je nacionalnimi programi reform ter programi za stabilnost in konvergenco?
How do you assess the legal interaction between two tools of a different nature, namely the National Reform Programmes (NRPs) and the Stability and Convergence Programmes (SCPs)?
Ali meni, da je Svet spremenil priporočila na pregleden način?
Do you feel that the Council's changes to the recommendations were made in a transparent manner?
Ali so še možnosti za izboljšave v zvezi s tem v prihodnjih letih?
Do you see any room for improvement in this regard in future years?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000221/2011
Question for oral answer O-000221/2011
v imenu skupine GUE/NGL Zadeva: Pridružitev Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju
on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Subject: Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to Schengen
Svoboda gibanja in odprava kontrol na notranjih mejah je eden največjih dosežkov evropskega integracijskega procesa, ki neposredno zadeva državljane.
Freedom of movement and the abolition of border checks at internal borders is one of the greatest achievements of the European integration process that directly affects citizens.
Romunija in Bolgarija sta v letu 2007 ob pridružitvi k EU sprejeli schengenski pravni red.
In 2007 Romania and Bulgaria adopted the Schengen acquis when joining the EU.
V skladu s členom 4(2) akta o pridružitvi je preverjanje na podlagi postopkov evalvacije, ali so države članice izpolnile predpisane pogoje za uporabo vseh delov schengenskega pravnega reda (varovanje podatkov, SIS, zračne, zemeljske in morske meje, policijsko sodelovanje in vizumi) predpogoj, da lahko Svet odloči o odpravi kontrol na notranjih mejah s temi državami članicami.
According to Article 4(2) of the Act of Accession, the verification through evaluation procedures that the necessary conditions for the application of all parts of the Schengen acquis (data protection, the SIS, air borders, land borders, sea borders, police cooperation and visas) have been met by the new Member States is a precondition for the Council to decide on the abolition of checks at internal borders with those Member States.
Ocenjevanje se začne na zahtevo zadevne države članice in se opravi v pristojnosti delovne skupine Sveta za schengensko evalvacijo.
The evaluation starts following a request by the Member State concerned and is conducted under the responsibility of the Schengen Evaluation Working Group.
Po končanem postopku ocenjevanja se v končnem poročilu predstavi, ali zadevna država članica izpolnjuje vse predpogoje za praktično uporabo.
After being subjected to a full evaluation procedure, the final report should establish whether that Member State fulfils all the preconditions for the practical application.
Svet odloči o integraciji na podlagi soglasne odločitve vseh vlad držav, ki so že del schengenskega območja.
The integration decision should be made by the Council, by unanimous decision of all the Governments of the States that already belong to the Schengen area.
V zadnjih letih sta Romunija in Bolgarija storili velik napredek in po poročilih strokovnjakov uspešno zaključili postopek schengenske evalvacije.
In recent years Romania and Bulgaria have made a huge effort and, according to the experts’ reports, they have successfully concluded the Schengen evaluation process.
Tako Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 8. junija 2011 kot tudi Svet v svojih sklepih z dne 9. junija 2011 sta potrdila pripravljenost obeh držav na pridružitev k schengenskemu območju.
Parliament in its resolution of 8 June 2011 and the Council in its Conclusions of 9 June 2011 certified the preparedness of both countries to join the Schengen Area.
Med zasedanjem Evropskega sveta 24. junija 2011 so se predsedniki držav in vlad dogovorili, da je treba odločitev o njihovi pridružitvi sprejeti najkasneje v septembru 2011.
During the European Council of 24 June 2011, the Heads of State and Government agreed that the decision concerning their accession should be taken no later than September 2011.
Nato pa sta se dve državi članici med zasedanjem Sveta za Pravosodje in notranje zadeve 22. septembra 2011 odločili blokirati ta prizadevanja in sprejem odločitve je bil odložen za nedoločen čas.
Then, during the last JHA Council of 22 September 2011, two Member States decided to block these aspirations and the decision was postponed indefinitely.
Ali Svet meni, da je pošteno uporabiti dodatna merila, ki od začetka niso bila predvidena, zlasti če upoštevamo, da se ta nova merila razlikujejo od meril, ki so veljala za prejšnje pristope?
Does the Council believe it is fair to apply extra criteria that were not foreseen from the beginning, especially if we take into account that these new criteria are different from the criteria which were applied to earlier accessions?
Odločitev o pridružitvi sta blokirali dve državi članici.
The accession decision has been blocked by two Member States.
Ali je Svet spoštoval svoje zakonske obveznosti glede odločitve o pridružitvi dveh držav kandidatk takoj, ko bosta ti izpolnjevali merila?
Has the Council respected its legal obligation to decide on the accession of the two candidate countries as soon as they meet the criteria?
Kaj namerava storiti Svet kot naslednje?
What are the next steps the Council intends to take?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000222/2011
Question for oral answer O-000222/2011
Svet odloči o integraciji na podlagi soglasne odločitve vseh vlad držav, ki so že del schengenskega območja.
The integration decision should be made by the Council, by unanimous decision of all the Governments of the States which already belong to the Schengen area.
Nato pa sta se dve državi članici med zasedanjem Sveta za Pravosodje in notranje zadeve 22. septembra 2011 odločili zaustaviti ta prizadevanja in sprejem odločitve je bil odložen za nedoločen čas.
Then, during the last JHA Council of 22 September 2011, two Member States decided to block these aspirations and the decision was postponed indefinitely.
Ali Komisija meni, da je pošteno uporabiti dodatna merila, ki od začetka niso bila predvidena, zlasti če upoštevamo, da se ta nova merila razlikujejo od meril, ki so veljala za prejšnje pristope?
Does the Commission believe it is fair to apply extra criteria that were not foreseen from the beginning, especially if we take into account that these new criteria are different from the criteria which were applied to earlier accessions?
Odločitev o pridružitvi sta zaustavili dve državi članici.
The accession decision has been blocked by two Member States.
Ali je Komisija spoštovala svojo pravno obveznost glede odločanja o pristopu dveh držav kandidatk takoj, ko izpolnita merila?
Has the Commission respected its legal obligation to decide on the accession of the two candidate countries as soon as they meet the criteria?
Kateri bodo naslednji koraki Komisije?
What are the next steps the Commission intends to take?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000223/2011
Question for oral answer O-000223/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Pristop Bolgarije in Romunije v schengensko območje
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Schengen Area
Člen 4(2) Pogodbe o pristopu k Evropski uniji določa, da morata Romunija in Bolgarija postati članici schengenskega območja, takoj ko izpolnita vse predpise, ki jih vključuje schengenski pravni red.
Under Article 4(2) of the Treaty of Accession to the European Union, Romania and Bulgaria are committed to becoming members of the Schengen area as soon as the implementation of the rules provided by the Schengen acquis is completed.
Po vstopu Romunije in Bolgarije v Evropsko unijo se je začel proces ocenjevanja pod vodstvom delovne skupine Sveta za schengensko evalvacijo, in sicer v zvezi z njunim izpolnjevanjem schengenskega pravnega reda na sedmih področjih: policijsko sodelovanje, varstvo zasebnih podatkov, vizumske in konzularne zadeve, zemeljske, zračne in morske meje in schengenski informacijski sistem.
Since their accession to the EU, Romania and Bulgaria have been subjected to an evaluation process led by the Schengen Evaluation Working Group (SCH-EVAL) of the Council of the European Union and regarding the implementation of the Schengen acquis in seven areas: police cooperation, personal data protection, visa and consular matters, land, air and maritime borders, and the Schengen Information System (SIS).