natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pol milijona Špancev je moralo pobegniti iz države, med njimi Nobelov nagrajenec za literaturo Juan Ramón Jiménez, na sto tisoče pa jih je bilo zaprtih ali odpeljanih v koncentracijska in delovna taborišča (zadnje je delovalo do leta 1962).
Half a million Spaniards were forced into exile, including Juan Ramón Jiménez, winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature, and hundreds of thousands were imprisoned and detained in concentration and work camps, the last of which closed in 1962.
Nedavno je Svet Evrope z veliko večino podprl pobudo o mednarodni obsodbi frankističnega režima, kar je prva obsodba te diktature na mednarodni ravni.
The Council of Europe recently adopted by a large majority a motion in favour of an 'international condemnation of the Franco regime'.
Poslanci, podpisniki tega vprašanja, se zavzemamo za to, da se v nobeni državi članici ne bi ponovila diktatura, pod kakršno je Španija trpela štiri desetletja.
The Members who signed this question wish to ensure that no Member State ever again undergoes a dictatorial regime such as that under which Spain suffered for four decades.
Prepričani smo, da bi imel duh Evropske unije, ki gradi na pravni državi ter načelih svobode, demokracije in spoštovanja temeljnih človekovih pravic in svoboščin, še večji smisel, če o okrutnih zločinih evropskih diktatorskih režimov ne bi molčali.
We believe that the spirit of the European Union, based on the rule of law and the principles of freedom, democracy and respect for human right and fundamental reasons would take on even greater meaning if a veil of silence was not drawn over the atrocities of Europe's dictatorial regimes.
Ali namerava Svet slediti mednarodni skupnosti in predlagati obsodbo frankističnega režima na evropski ravni, 18. julij 2006 pa razglasiti za uradni dan obsodbe frankističnega režima?
Does the Council intend to follow the international community's example and propose that the Franco regime be condemned at European level, and also to declare 18 July 2006 an official day of condemnation of the Franco regime?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0059/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0059/06
Se Komisiji ne zdi, da bi morala izraziti svoje stališče do obsodbe frankističnega režima?
Would it not be appropriate for the Commission to take a stance on condemning the Franco regime?
Ali namerava narediti kaj za to, da bi pomagala tistim, ki so bili in so še žrtve omenjenega režima?
Does the Commission intend to take any action to help those who were, and still are, victims of the Franco regime?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0060/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0060/06
Zadeva: Uporaba iverke pri tehnikah staranja vina
Subject: Use of wood chippings to age wine
Evropska unija meni, da ima absolutno prednost politika o varstvu potrošnikov, preglednosti nalepk na živilih in vrednotenju kakovosti kmetijskih izdelkov;
the fact that consumer protection, clear labelling of foodstuffs and promoting the quality of agricultural products are considered priority policies by the EU;
naj bi bilo v upravljalnem odboru za vino med večino nacionalnih poslancev doseženo okvirno soglasje o možni uporabi iverke pri enoloških postopkih staranja;
the broad agreement apparently reached between the majority of national delegations within the Wine Management Committee to include the use of wood chippings among the permitted wine ageing methods;
ta načrt spreminja uredbe (ES) št. 1622/2000 , (ES) št. 884/2001 in (ES) št. 753/2002 , ga morajo preučiti pristojne službe Svetovne trgovinske organizacije;
the fact that the proposal to amend Regulations (CE) No.1622/2000 , (CE) No. 884/2001 and (CE) No. 753/2002 is currently under consideration by the relevant World Trade Organisation bodies;
evropski potrošniki postajajo vedno bolj porabniki kakovostnih vin, tudi zaradi vedno pogostejše uporabe tradicionalnih in varnih proizvodnih postopkov, ki imajo močno lokalno tradicijo;
the steadily increasing demand from European consumers for quality wines, stemming not least from the use of traditional, safe, geographically based production methods;
konkurenca na evropskem vinarsko-vinogradniškem področju temelji zlasti na izdelkih preverjene kakovosti, ki so čedalje bolj priljubljeni tudi med potrošniki na mednarodnem trgu;
the fact that the competitiveness of the European wine industry is based mainly on products of certified quality, which are becoming increasingly popular among consumers on the international market;
sprašujejo Komisijo:
would the Commission answer the following questions:
Kakšno je mnenje Komisije o tem predlogu odbora za vina, če upošteva poglede Skupnosti na kakovost in preglednost nalepk?
In the light of Community policy on quality and clear labelling, what is the Commission's position on the Wine Committee's proposal?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi lahko tak enološki postopek, zaradi napačnega prikaza značilnosti, ki jih vina običajno pridobijo s tradicionalnim staranjem v "barrique", škodil načelu preglednosti?
Would it not agree that the proposed ageing method would undermine the transparency principle by artificially imitating the features of wines that are normally produced using the traditional method of ageing in barrels?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi morebitno dovoljenje (čeprav nezaželeno) moralo izključevati vina z zaščiteno geografsko označbo (ZGO), zaščitenim geografskim poreklom (ZGP) in zaščitenim tradicionalnim ugledom (ZTU), ter da bi druga vina morala obvezno imeti nalepko z napisom o uporabi iverke?
Would it not agree that the (albeit unadvisable) authorisation of this practice should be ruled out for DOC, DOCG and IGT wines and, for other wines, should carry with it the obligation to state on the label that the wine chippings method has been used?
Ali Komisija meni, da bi uporaba tega postopka pri evropskih proizvajalcih lahko povzročila opuščanje tradicionalnih postopkov staranja zaradi višjih stroškov teh postopkov v primerjavi z novim?
Would it not agree that authorisation of the practice could result in European producers abandoning traditional ageing methods because they are more costly than the new one?
Ali je Komisija preučila vse posledice tega predloga, zlasti učinek na konkurenco na evropskem trgu kakovostnih vin?
Has it assessed all the proposal's impacts, particularly on the competitiveness of the European market for quality wines?
UL L 194, 31.7.2000, str.
OJ L 194, 31.7.2000, p.
UL L 128, 10.5.2001, str.
OJ L 128, 10.5.2001, p.
UL L 118, 4.5.2002, str.
OJ L 118, 4.5.2002, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0061/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0061/06
Zadeva: Politika priseljevanja v Evropski uniji
Subject: European Union immigration policy
Zato se morajo Evropske institucije tega pojava lotiti strateško, upoštevajoč sodelovanje za razvoj z državami izvora in tržno politiko, ukrepe za nadzor mej, politiko pogajanj o sporazumih o vračanju, metodično upravljanje migracijskih tokov in družbene ukrepe za sprejem, integracijo legalnih in izgona ilegalnih priseljencev, z najstrožjim spoštovanjem človekovih pravic.
As such, it needs to be addressed by the European institutions from a strategic point of view ranging from development cooperation with countries of origin and trade policy to border control measures, via policy on negotiating readmission agreements, the orderly management of migration flows and social reception measures, the integration of legal immigrants and the expulsion of illegal immigrants, whilst ensuring the strictest respect for human rights.
S tega stališča se vprašanje skupine PSE Komisiji nujno nanaša na različne teme:
The PSE Group's question to the Commission must therefore comprise various strands:
Sodelovanje za razvoj in trgovino: Ali lahko Komisija poroča o napredku pri doseganju zastavljenih ciljev v Strategiji za Afriko, podrobneje, kar zadeva prizadevanje za krepitev vezi med preseljevanjem in razvojem ter pospeševanje so-razvoja, vračanje, ponovno integracijo v države izvora in prenos kapitala in tehnologije s strani migrantov?
Development cooperation and trade: Can the Commission report on the progress made towards achieving the objectives set in the Strategy for Africa, specifically with regard to strengthening the links between migration and development and promoting codevelopment, return emigration, reintegration in the countries of origin and transfers of capital and technology by migrants?
Kakšne ukrepe je sprejela, da bi afriškim vladam zagotovila uporabo trgovine kot sredstva za boj proti revščini in za preprečevanje izseljevanja?
What measures is it taking to ensure that African governments are able to use trade as an instrument for combating poverty and preventing emigration?
Kakšne vzpodbude uporablja Komisija za pospešitev oblikovanja celostnih regionalnih trgov v različnih subsaharskih regijah in kakšne predloge pripravlja znotraj STO za izboljšanje izvoznih zmožnosti držav v razvoju in pospeševanje trgovine jug-jug?
What incentives is the Commission using to foster the creation of integrated regional markets in the various sub-Saharan regions, and what proposals is it making within the WTO with a view to improving the export capacity of developing countries and boosting South-South trade?
Legalno priseljevanje in boj proti ilegalnemu priseljevanju: Katere programe je osnovala Komisija za boj proti ilegalnemu priseljevanju in koliko sredstev jim namenja?
Legal immigration and the fight against illegal immigration: What programmes has the Commission drawn up to combat illegal immigration and what funds is it allocating to those programmes?
Ali države, ki pri oblikovanju sporazumov o vračanju sodelujejo z državami članicami EU, prejemajo pomoč za upravljanje njihovih migracijskih tokov?
Is it favouring those countries which are cooperating with EU Member States on drawing up readmission agreements by providing aid to foster the management of their migration flows?
Ali je predvidena evropska politika za vzpodbujanje preseljevanja zaradi dela predvsem preko dvostranskih in večstranskih pogodb z državami izvora?
Are there any plans for a European policy to promote migration for work purposes, principally through bilateral and multilateral agreements with countries of origin?
Kako načrtuje razvoj načrta legalnega priseljevanja, predvidenega v haškem programu, ki ga je predstavila decembra 2005?
How does it intend to implement the legal immigration plan envisaged in the Hague Programme, which it submitted in December 2005?
Kakšne ukrepe se sprejema za boj proti trgovini z ljudmi z namenom spolnega izkoriščanja?
What measures are being taken to combat people trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation?
Upravljanje mej: Kakšne konkretne ukrepe je sprejela Evropska agencija za zunanje meje za povečanje tehnološke pomoči državam članicam, v katerih to zahtevajo okoliščine ?
Border management: What specific measures has the European Agency for External Borders taken to boost technical assistance for Member States whose circumstances require it?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0062/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0062/06
Zadeva: Uporaba lesnih ostružkov pri enoloških postopkih za evropska vina
Subject: Use of wood chips as oenological practice for European wines
Veljavni predpisi ES v zvezi z enološkimi postopki evropskim pridelovalcem vina prepovedujejo uporabo lesnih ostružkov pri staranju vina.
Current EC regulations on oenological practice do not allow European wine producers to use wood chippings for wine ageing.
Predpisi v drugih državah, zlasti ZDA, Čileju in Južni Afriki tega ne določajo.
No such prohibition is applied by other wine-producing states’ regulations, in particular the USA, Chile and South Africa.
Poleg tega lahko po nedavnem sporazumu z Evropsko unijo pridelovalci vina iz teh držav vino na notranji trg EU izvažajo, brez da bi na nalepkah navedli uporabo lesnih ostružkov.
Furthermore, due to a recent agreement with the European Union, these wine producers can export their wine in the EU internal market, without making any reference to the use of wood chippings in their bottle's labelling.
Da bi zapolnili to vrzel, je upravljalni odbor za vino pripravil spremembo veljavnih pravil o enoloških postopkih, po katerih naj bi bila pri staranju vina namesto tradicionalnega postopka "barrique" dovoljena uporaba lesnih ostružkov.
With a view to filling this gap, the Management Committee on Wine is about to approve a modification of the current rules on oenological practice, in order to allow wood chippings to be used for wine ageing instead of the traditional ‘barrique’ practice.
Predlog Evropske komisije tudi ne predvideva, da bi bila uporaba lesnih ostružkov obvezno označena na nalepkah.
Moreover, the European Commission proposal does not stipulate that the use of wood chippings must be indicated on the wine bottle's label.
Kako namerava Evropska komisija zaščiti evropske vinske tradicije in visoko kakovostni standard evropskih vin?
How does the Commission intend to protect European viticultural traditions and the high quality standard of European wine?
Kako bo Evropska komisija upravičila legalizacijo takšne prakse v primerjavi s politiko na področju varnosti hrane?
How does the Commission intend to justify the legalisation of such a practice in relation to its policy on food safety?
Ali Evropska komisija meni, da je tovrstna praksa pridelave vina v skladu z zahtevano visoko ravnjo varstva potrošnika, če naj bi ne bilo obvezno na nalepkah označiti, da so bili pri staranju uporabljeni lesni ostružki?
Is the Commission convinced that this wine-making practice will ensure a high level of consumer protection, if it is not compulsory for the use of wood chippings for wine ageing to be indicated on wine labelling?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0063/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0063/06
Zadeva: Vizumska politika do držav zahodnega Balkana
Subject: Visa policy towards the countries of the Western Balkans
Tri leta po sprejetju solunskega programa iz junija 2003 so dosežki vizumske politike EU do držav zahodnega Balkana še vedno pičli.
Three years after the adoption of the Thessaloniki Agenda of June 2003, the achievements of the EU on visa policy towards the countries of the Western Balkans are still poor.
Države članice EU do omenjenih držav izvajajo različne ureditve in na splošno so v veljavi dokaj stroge omejitve.
The EU Member States apply different regimes to those countries and, in general, major restrictions are in place.
To občutno ovira socialne in gospodarske izmenjave ter razvoj regije, omejuje priložnosti na številnih področjih, od izobraževanja preko trgovine, do regionalnega sodelovanja in zaposlovanja.
This is seriously hampering social and economic exchanges and development for the region, and reducing opportunities in many fields, from education to trade, from regional cooperation to employment.
Učinkovitost omejevalnih ureditev v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu je vprašljiva.
The efficiency of a restrictive regime in the fight against organised crime can be questioned.
Storilci kaznivih dejanj žal že izkoriščajo možnost prostega gibanja brez vizumov, zato je posledično stopnja kriminala v nekaterih državah EU višja kot v nekaterih državah zahodnega Balkana.
Criminals unfortunately already benefit from free movement without visas, and in some EU Member States the rate of criminality is higher than in some countries of the Western Balkans.
Državam zahodnega Balkana je bilo podano zagotovilo o evropski prihodnosti, natančneje, EU je ob različnih priložnostih jasno dala vedeti, da so na poti k evropski integraciji in sčasoma članstvu v EU.
The Western Balkans countries have been given an assurance that they have European prospects, e.g. the EU has clearly stated on various occasions that they are heading towards European integration and, in due course, full EU membership.
V Solunu smo proces stabilizacije in pridruževanja oplemenitili z dejavniki, ki so bili del izkušenj z novimi državami, ki so k EU pristopile leta 2004, med njimi odpiranje programov EU in politični dialog.
Thessaloniki has enriched the Stabilisation and Association process with elements taken from experience with the new countries which acceded to the EU in 2004, such as the opening of EU programmes and political dialogue.
Evropska komisija je po vrhu v Solunu podala nekaj predlogov za udejanjanje tega okrepljenega približevanja ter nedavno, konec januarja, objavila sporočilo, v katerem so navedeni predlogi za zakonodajo EU na področju olajšanja dodeljevanja vizumov s sklicevanjem na države zahodnega Balkana.
The European Commission, after Thessaloniki, put forward some proposals to make this enhanced rapprochement more concrete, and, more recently, a communication at the end of January which includes proposals for EU legislation on visa facilitation referring to the countries of the Western Balkans.
Na medministrski konferenci EU o notranji varnosti na začetku meseca maja na Dunaju je komisar Frattini podal pomembne izjave, vendar dejanja še niso sledila.
At the Vienna Inter-ministerial Conference on EU internal security in early May, important declarations were made by Commissioner Frattini, but action is still missing.
Zastoj ni produktiven in je v nasprotju z lastno politiko EU.
This impasse is counter-productive and contradictory in respect of the EU's own policy.
Je Svet pripravljen ukrepati v zvezi s tem?
Would the Council be ready to take action on this?
Bo Svet države članice pozval, naj pristanejo na predčasno izvajanje nekaterih od naštetih ukrepov?
Will the Council ask the Member States to agree on early application of some of these measures?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0064/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0064/06
Zadeva: Evropska politika priseljevanja
Subject: EU policy on immigration
Pojav nezakonitega priseljevanja se že več let povečuje.
Over many years the phenomenon of illegal migration has been increasing.
Po splošni ugotovitvi je nezakonito priseljevanje postalo globalni pojav iz katerega EU ni izvzeta.
There is a common recognition that illegal migration has become a global phenomenon, from which the EU is not exempt.
Tako obstaja tudi teoretska usmeritev, ki pravi, da teh izzivov ne morejo reševati države članice posamično, vendar jih je treba kot nujne obravnavati tudi na evropski ravni.
Equally, there is a school of thought that these challenges can not be solved only by Member States acting individually, but should also be tackled as a matter of urgency at European level.
Evropska strategija, ki zadeva nezakonito priseljevanje mora zajemati štiri vidike:
The European strategy to address illegal migration should encompass four aspects:
razvoj v državah izvora in partnerstvo z njimi varovanje zunanjih meja in boj proti trgovanju z ljudmi stroga politika vračanja vključevanje priseljencev v družbo gostiteljico
development and partnership in and with the countries of origin, securing external borders and the fight against human trafficking, a robust returns policy, integration of migrants into their host society.
Priznavamo, da je Komisija pripravila predloge za prednostne naloge v boju proti nezakonitem priseljevanju in določila več morebitnih pobud na področju zakonitega priseljevanja.
We recognise that the Commission has set out suggestions for priorities to combat illegal immigration and identified a range of possible initiatives to take in the field of legal migration.
Ti ukrepi Komisije vključujejo tudi predlog za izdelavo ključnih elementov politike EU o vračanju.
These actions by the Commission include also the proposal for the elaboration of key elements of an EU returns policy.
Ali lahko Komisija v zvezi z vključevanjem priseljencev razloži:
With regard to the integration of migrants, can the Commission explain:
kateri ukrepi za razvoj bolj usklajene politike vključevanja priseljencev trenutno že obstajajo na ravni EU ?
what measures currently exist at EU level to develop a more coordinated integration policy for migrants?
kaj namerava Komisija še narediti za nadaljnji razvoj te politike?
what further steps does the Commission intend to take to develop this policy further?
katere ukrepe Komisija trenutno izvaja za prepoznavanje glavnih ovir za uspešno vključevanje priseljencev v njihovo družbo gostiteljico, zlasti pa ali Komisija določa in širi primere najboljših praks na tem področju v posameznih državah članicah?
what steps is the Commission taking to identify the major barriers to the successful integration of migrants into their host societies, in particular is the Commission identifying and disseminating examples of best practice in individual Member States in this field?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0065/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0065/06
Zadeva: Navedba države izvora na nekaterih izdelkih, uvoženih iz tretjih držav ("označba izvora")
Subject: Indication of the country of origin of certain products imported from Third countries ('origin marking')
Evropska komisija je decembra 2005 predstavila predlog uredbe Sveta o zahtevi glede označevanja države izvora za nekatere izdelke, uvožene iz tretjih držav.
In December 2005, the European Commission issued a proposal for a Council Regulation requiring the marking of the country of origin for certain products imported from third countries.
Namen predloga je uvedba obveznega sistema označevanja države izvora (zahteva "made in") za različne uvožene izdelke, kot so tekstil, nakit, oblačila, obutev, usnje, svetila in pribor za svetila, steklovina in ročne torbe.
The proposal aims at introducing a mandatory country of origin marking system ('made in' requirement) for a number of imported products such as textiles, jewellery, apparel, footwear, leather, lamps and light fittings, glassware, and handbags.
Predlog ne krije označevanja "made in EU", saj velja le za uvoženo blago.
The proposal does not cover the marking 'made in EU' because it is only applicable to imported goods.
Kljub dejstvu, da se Komisija in Svet v celoti zavedata pomena, ki ga Parlament pripisuje vprašanju označevanja izvora, Komisija predlagane uredbe sploh ni posredovala v vednost Parlamentu.
Despite the fact that the Commission and Council were fully aware of the importance that the Parliament attaches to the issue of origin marking, the Commission did not even send the proposed regulation to Parliament for information.
Evropski parlament se zaveda, da predlog temelji na členu 133 Pogodbe in zaradi tega ni pravne zahteve za posvetovanje s Parlamentom.
Parliament is aware that this proposal is based on Article 133 of the Treaty, and as such, does not legally require Parliament's consultation.
Vendar mora Evropski parlament vedno imeti možnost, da pravočasno izrazi svoje stališče o vsaki zadevni pobudi, ki so jo sprejele druge institucije Skupnosti, v skladu z medinstitucionalnim okvirnim sporazumom z dne 26. maja 2005.
However, Parliament should always be given the opportunity to express its views in a timely way on any relevant initiative undertaken by other Community institutions, in accordance with the Interinstitutional Framework Agreement of 26 May 2005.
Ali Komisija lahko navede razlog za svojo odločitev, da ne bo obvestila Parlamenta o predlagani uredbi o označevanju izvora?
Could the Commission provide any justifications supporting its decision not to inform Parliament about the proposed regulation on origin marking?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je ta odločitev v nasprotju z duhom ali celo s črko medinstitucionalnega okvirnega sporazuma z dne 26. maja 2005?
Does the Commission agree that this decision is against the spirit, if not the letter, of the Interinstitutional Framework Agreement of 26 May 2005?
Ali bi lahko Komisija in Svet brez odlašanja sporočila Parlamentu rezultate presoje vplivov in/ali pravne analize, opravljene v zvezi z zadevnim predlogom, zlasti glede domnevnih neskladnosti z obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti in pravili STO?
Could the Commission and Council inform Parliament without delay of the results of any impact assessment and/or legal analysis carried out with respect to this proposal, concerning in particular its alleged inconsistencies with existing Community legislation and with WTO rules?
Kako namerava Komisija spremljati in nadzorovati izvajanje novega sistema označevanja ter preprečevati izogibanje temu sistemu?
How will the Commission monitor and control the implementation of the new origin marking system and avoid circumvention?