natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali lahko Komisija organe Združenih držav nemudoma zaprosi za uradna in natančna pojasnila o sodnih pozivih, o tem, ali so pozivi povezani s preiskavo nezakonitih dejavnosti (v tem primeru naj se o tem dajo podatki), o zahtevanih podatkih, o virih, sredstvih javnega obveščanja in družbah za komunikacijo, ki jih to zadeva, pa tudi o vseh drugih podatkih, pomembnih za to zadevo?
Can the Commission as a matter of urgency seek official and detailed clarifications from the US authorities about the subpoena(s), whether they are connected to a criminal enquiry regarding illegal acts (and if so, provide information), the data requested, the sources, media and communication companies concerned, as well as any other relevant information on the case?
Ali lahko Komisija nemudoma pojasni:
Can the Commission clarify, as a matter of urgency:
– vprašanje pristojnosti in zakonitosti takega domnevno ekstrateritorialnega delovanja, ter skladnost teh pravnih ukrepov z varovanjem zasebnosti državljanov EU, vključno z vprašanjem, ali je kršen ali bi lahko bil kršen kakšen evropski ali nacionalni zakon o varstvu podatkov;
– the issue of jurisdiction and the legality of its apparent extra-territorial application, and compatibility of these legal moves with protection of the privacy of EU citizens, including the question of whether any European or national data protection law has been or could be violated;
– ali ve za kakšne podobne sodne pozive, ki so bili izdani v preteklosti v zvezi z osebnimi podatki državljanov EU, in kaj je v zvezi s tem naredila;
– whether it is aware of any similar subpoenas issued in the past in relation to personal data of EU citizens and what action it took in this regard;
– kakšno stališče in ukrepe bo sprejela do organov Združenih držav ter družb za javno obveščanje in komunikacijo v primeru dejanske ali preteče kršitve določb EU o varstvu podatkov?
– what representations it will make and what action it will take towards the US authorities and media and communication companies in the event of violation, actual or prospective, of EU data protection rules?
Zahtevani podatki vključujejo: imena naročnikov, uporabniška imena, psevdonime in druge identitete; poštne naslove, naslove prebivališč, službene naslove, elektronske naslove in druge kontaktne informacije; registre povezav ali registre časa in trajanja posameznih povezav; trajanje storitev (vključno z datumom začetka) in vrste uporabljenih storitev; telefonsko številko ali številko naprave ali drugo naročniško številko ali identiteto, vključno z morebitnimi začasnimi spletnimi naslovi; načine in vire plačevanja teh storitev (vključno s številkami kreditnih kartic ali številkami bančnih računov) in registre fakturiranja; zabeležke o vseh dejavnostih uporabnikov glede vseh povezav, opravljenih z njegovega uporabniškega računa ali na njegov uporabniški račun; nevsebinske podatke, kot so IP naslovi in izvorni ali ciljni naslovi elektronske pošte; korespondenco in izpiske iz registra v zvezi z uporabniškimi računi.
The data requested includes: subscriber names, user names, screen names or other identities; mailing addresses, residential addresses, business addresses, e-mail addresses and other contact information; connection records, or records of session times and durations; length of service (including start date) and types of services utilised; telephone or instrument number or other subscriber number or identity, including any temporarily assigned network address; means and source of payment for such services (including any credit card or bank account number) and billing records; records of user activity for any connections made to or from the account; non-content information such as IP addresses and source or destination e-mail addresses; correspondence and notes of records related to the accounts.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000005/2011
Question for oral answer O-000005/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Odkritje dioksina v živalski krmi v Nemčiji
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Dioxin animal feed incident in Germany
Nemške oblasti so 27. decembra 2010 Komisiji poročale o mešanju maščobnih kislin, ki vsebujejo dioksin in so namenjene industrijski rabi, s krmno rastlinsko maščobo v več nemških zveznih deželah.
On 27 December 2010, the German authorities reported an incident to the Commission following mixing of fatty acids meant for technical purposes containing dioxins with vegetable feed fat in several German Länder .
Več kot 4700 kmetij v Nemčiji je ustavilo proizvodnjo takoj po odkritju, da je kontaminirane do 3000 ton krmne rastlinske maščobe.
More than 4 700 farms were originally closed in Germany following the contamination of up to 3 000 tonnes of vegetable feed fat.
Ta proizvod je bil distribuiran kmetijam v osmih zveznih deželah, nekaj pa ga je bilo izvoženega na Nizozemsko in nato distribuiranega v Združeno kraljestvo v predelanih proizvodih.
The product was distributed to farms in eight Länder and some of it has been exported to the Netherlands and then distributed to the UK in the form of processed products.
Glede na to odkritje:
Following the incident:
– Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, s katerimi ukrepi poskuša zagotoviti varstvo potrošnikov in varnost hrane in ali bo EFSA ali katera od nacionalnih agencij za varnost hrane pripravila kakšno poročilo o tveganjih za zdravje ljudi?
– Can the Commission explain what action it has been taking to ensure consumer protection and food safety and if any report on risks to human health will be carried out by EFSA or a national food safety agency?
– Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, v kakšnih okoliščinah so bile maščobne kisline, ki vsebujejo dioksin in so namenjene industrijski rabi, sploh primešane krmni rastlinski maščobi?
– Can the Commission explain the circumstances under which fatty acids containing dioxin meant for technical purposes were mixed in the first place with vegetable feed fat?
– Mediji so poročali, da je predstavnik komisarja Johna Dallija pritrdil dvomom o zmožnosti Komisije, da odkrije predelane proizvode, ki vsebujejo kontaminirana jajca.
– The press has reported that Commissioner John Dalli's spokesperson has conceded doubts on the Commission's ability to identify processed products that contain contaminated eggs.
Kakšne rešitve, poleg označevanja države izvora, ima Komisija na voljo za zagotovitev popolne sledljivosti živilskih proizvodov od proizvodnje do uporabe?
What means does the Commission have to guarantee full traceability of food products from production to use, beyond country of origin labelling?
– Ali namerava Komisija sprejeti dodatne ukrepe v smislu ločitve proizvodov, sledljivosti in spremljanja obstoječih nacionalnih sistemov nadzora in izvajanja, da bi zaščitila potrošnike in zagotovila varnost hrane ter v prihodnje preprečila tovrstne dogodke?
– Does the Commission intend to take further action in terms of products separation, traceability and monitoring of the national control/implementation systems in place in order to protect consumers and food safety and prevent future incidents of this nature from happening?
– Ali lahko Komisija oceni gospodarske posledice tega dogodka za ustrezne sektorje?
– Can the Commission provide figures on the economic impact of the incident for the relevant sectors?
– Kako bo Komisija pomagala hitro povrniti zaupanje potrošnikov v evropske standarde varnosti hrane?
– How will the Commission assist in ensuring that consumer confidence in EU food safety standards is quickly regained?
– Ali lahko Komisija navede, ali obstaja sistem, ki bo zagotovil povračilo kmetom za izgube zaradi tega dogodka?
– Finally, is the Commission aware of a system in place to ensure that farmers will be compensated for the subsequent losses?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000006/2011
Question for oral answer O-000006/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Prenos pravnega reda EU na področju azila
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Transposition of the EU asylum law acquis
Države članice so s stockholmskim programom še dodatno potrdile, da nameravajo do leta 2012 vzpostaviti skupen evropski azilni sistem.
The Stockholm Programme is a further reassertion by the Member States of their intention to set up a common European asylum system by 2012.
Vendar pa so pogajanja o sedanjih predlogih azilnega prava, kot so KOM(2008)0815, KOM(2008)0820, KOM(2009)0554 in KOM(2009)0551, težavna.
However, negotiations on current asylum law proposals, such as COM(2008)0815, COM(2008)0820, COM(2009)0554 and COM(2009)0551, are proving difficult.
Deloma je temu tako, ker je bil dosedanji prenos prve generacije azilne zakonodaje Unije neustrezen ali ga celo ni bilo, kar je še zlasti pokazal na primer postopek zaradi ugotavljanja kršitve pogodbe proti Grčiji.
This is, in part, because transposition of the Union’s first-generation asylum legislation has been inadequate or non-existent to date, as illustrated, notably, by the Treaty infringement proceedings against Greece.
Pogoj za širitev azilne zakonodaje Unije in njeno dopolnjevanje na razumen način je torej pregled trenutnega stanja pri prenosu veljavne zakonodaje v državah članicah.
A survey of the current state of transposition of existing legislation in the Member States is thus a prerequisite for extending and supplementing the Union’s asylum legislation in a sensible way.
Taka analiza prenosa je bila nedavno predstavljena v poročilu KOM(2010)0465 za direktivo 2005/85/ES, ki pa zato pokriva le majhen delež azilne zakonodaje Unije.
Such a transposition analysis in respect of the application of Directive 2005/85/EC was submitted recently (COM(2010)0465) but, by its nature, it covers only a small proportion of the Union’s asylum legislation.
Tako sprašujemo:
In the light of this:
Koliko je trenutno postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, ker ni bil opravljen prenos pravnega reda EU na področju azila ali pa ni bil prenesen pravilno?
How many Treaty infringement proceedings for failure to transpose the EU asylum law acquis , or for incorrect transposition thereof, are currently ongoing?
Ali Komisija namerava predložiti Parlamentu poročilo o stanju prenosa celotnega pravnega reda EU na področju azila?
Is the Commission prepared to submit a report to Parliament on the state of transposition of the entire EU asylum law acquis ?
Do kakšnih sklepov je prišla Komisija na podlagi stanja prenosa pravnega reda EU na področju azila?
What conclusion does the Commission draw from the state of transposition of the EU asylum law acquis ?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000007/2011
Question for oral answer O-000007/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Škandal z dioksinom v živalski krmi v Nemčiji
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Dioxin animal feed scandal in Germany
Nemške oblasti so 27. decembra 2010 obvestile Komisijo, da so bile maščobne kisline iz podjetja Harles und Jentzsch, ki vsebujejo dioksin in so bile namenjene industrijski rabi, primešane maščobam, ki se uporabljajo za proizvodnjo živalske krme.
On 27 December 2010, the German authorities gave information to the Commission that fatty acids - from a company called Harles and Jentzsch- meant to be used for industrial processes containing dioxins were mixed up with feed fat used to make animal feed.
Čeprav to podjetje že od marca 2010 ve za kontaminacijo z dioksinom, tega ni prijavilo javnim organom, kar je povsem nesprejemljivo za kmete, potrošnike in zlasti Komisijo, ki je pristojna za sprožitev sistema hitrega opozarjanja na nevarnosti hrane in krme (RASFF).
The fact that this company was aware of the contamination with dioxin since March 2010, without reporting it to the public authorities, is totally unacceptable to farmers, consumers and, in particular, the Commission, which is responsible for triggering the RASFF (Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed).
Medtem je bila kontaminirana krma dobavljena več nemškim zveznim deželam, kontaminirana jajca in predelani proizvodi pa so bili izvoženi v druge države članice EU.
Meanwhile, the contaminated feeding stuff had been delivered to several German Länder and contaminated eggs and processed products had been delivered to other EU Member States.
Laboratorijske preiskave so prejšnji teden pokazale prisotnost dioksina tudi v prašičjem mesu.
Last week’s laboratory results have shown that pig meat has also been contaminated with dioxin.
Skoraj 5000 nemških kmetij je moralo začasno ustaviti proizvodnjo in ta trenutek nihče ne ve, kdo bo plačal za izgube kmetov.
As a result, nearly 5 000 farms were closed down in Germany and nobody knows who will pay for farmers’ losses.
Zaradi te kontaminacije z dioksinom so potrošniki v vsej Evropi zaskrbljeni zaradi varnosti hrane.
Consumers all over Europe are very concerned about food safety due to this dioxin contamination.
Glede na ponavljajoče se hude težave z varnostjo hrane v Evropi:
Taking into account serious repetitive food safety problems in Europe:
Ali bo Komisija preučila, ali je treba pregledati in okrepiti sedanji zakonodajni okvir, da bi v prihodnje preprečili težave z varnostjo krme?
Does the Commission consider that the current legislative framework should be reviewed and strengthened in order to prevent problems with feed safety in the future?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo nacionalne in regionalne oblasti izvajale učinkovitejši nadzor nad prehransko verigo?
How will the Commission make sure that national and regional authorities will implement more efficient control of the food chain?
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi popolno sledljivost celotne verige proizvodnje krme?
Can the Commission guarantee full traceability for the complete processing chain for feeding stuffs?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000008/2011
Question for oral answer O-000008/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Združeni zadevi C-585/08 Pammer ter C-144/09 Hotel Alpenhof
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Joined Cases C-585/08 and C-144/09 Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof
Sodišče EU je pred kratkim v združenih zadevah C-585/08 Pammer in C-144/09 Hotel Alpenhof razsodilo o pristojnem sodišču za reševanje sporov v zvezi s storitvami, ki so na voljo na internetu.
The Court of Justice has recently delivered a judgment on the competent jurisdiction to deal with disputes concerning services offered on the internet in Joined Cases C-585/08 and C-144/09 Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof.
Sodišče je navedlo nekaj primerov dokazov, iz katerih je pri določanju sodne pristojnosti mogoče sklepati, da trgovec usmerja svoje dejavnosti v državo članico potrošnikovega stalnega prebivališča (npr. uporaba tujega jezika ali valute, navedba mednarodne klicne kode pri telefonski številki, uporaba vrhnje (top-level) internetne domene, navedba mednarodnih strank itd.).
The Court gives some examples of evidence from which it may be concluded that the trader’s activity is directed to the Member State of the consumer’s domicile for the purpose of determining the judicial competence (e.g. use of foreign language or a currency, mention of telephone numbers with an international code, use of a top-level domain name, mention of an international clientele etc.).
Kako namerava Komisija med drugim zagotoviti, da se evropski pravni red spremeni tako, da
How does the Commission intend to ensure inter alia that the acquis is modified so that
- je na spletni strani mogoče navesti mednarodno klicno kodo, ali da
- a website can have an international prefix for telephone numbers, or
- opisa potovanja ni treba omejiti zgolj na ozemlje domače države članice, ali da
- a travel description must not stop at the border, or
- lahko podjetja, ki poslujejo čezmejno, uporabljajo vrhnjo domeno .eu
- the .eu top level domain can be used by enterprises doing cross-border business
ne da bi s tem tvegala, da bodo za reševanje sporov pristojna sodišča v državi potrošnika?
without running the risk that the judicial competence will be in the consumer's country?
Katere možnosti za to vidi Komisija zlasti v okviru prenovljenega predloga za uredbo Bruselj I (KOM(2010)0748), pa tudi uredbo Rim I ((ES) št. 593/2008)?
What possibilities does the Commission see in particular in the context of the recast proposal for the 'Brussels I' Regulation (COM(2010)0748) as well as the 'Rome I' Regulation (EC) No 593/2008)?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000009/2011
Question for oral answer O-000009/2011
Zadeva: Sprememba okvira za strokovne skupine Komisije in uravnoteženo zastopanost ter preglednost
Subject: Revision of framework for Commission expert groups and balanced representation and transparency
Nedavno je Komisija spremenila svoj okvir za upravljanje strokovnih skupin Komisije (SEC(2010)1360) in (C(2010)7649).
Recently, the Commission has revised its framework governing Commission expert groups (SEC(2010)1360) and (C(2010)7649).
Trenutno ima veliko število strokovnih skupin pristransko sestavo v korist interesov velikih podjetij.
Currently, a large number of expert groups have a biased composition in favour of the interests of big businesses.
V spremenjeno različico okvira ni bil vključen noben ukrep za večjo uravnoteženost strokovnih skupin, ki bi predvideval okrepitev udeležbe MSP ali civilne družbe v strokovnih skupinah.
In the revised version of the framework, no measures are taken to strive for more balanced expert groups by taking measures to enhance SME or civil society participation in expert groups.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da to pomeni, da uravnoteženo svetovanje ni obvezno?
Does the Commission not agree that this suggests that getting balanced advice is not obligatory?
Če ni tako, ali lahko za to navede razloge?
If this is not the case, can it explain why not?
Komisija izbere strokovnjake na takšen način, da prepreči kakršno koli navzkrižje interesov.
The selection of experts by the Commission 'shall be carried out in such a way as to avoid any conflicts of interest'.
Smernice GD Sanco za obravnavanje navzkrižij interesov določajo, da je najpreprostejši način za obvladovanje navzkrižij interesov njihovo preprečevanje.
DG Sanco's guidelines to deal with conflicts of interest state that 'the simplest way to handle conflicts of interest is to avoid them altogether.
Na primer osebe, ki je bila imenovana za svetovalca, za katero je znano, da dela za organizacijo, ki ima "osebni interes" glede specifičnega političnega vprašanja, pač ne bi smeli imenovati.
For example, someone who is known to work for an organisation with a "vested interest" on a particular policy issue and is appointed adviser, should simply not be appointed'.
Zakaj Komisija ni sprejela tega odličnega pravila za vse GD?
Why has the Commission not adopted this excellent rule for all DGs?
Preglednost je temeljno načelo za institucije v postopku sprejemanja odločitev EU v skladu s členoma 1 in 11 PEU, poleg člena 15 PDEU, ki določa pravico javnosti do dostopa do dokumentov.
Transparency is a core principle for the institutions in EU decision-making, under Articles 1 and 11 of TEU, in addition to Article 15 of TFEU giving the public the right of access to documents.
Ali bo Komisija s tem v zvezi vzpostavila uporabniku prijazno spletno stran, na kateri bodo objavljeni vsi javni razpisi, vse obstoječe strokovne skupine s priloženim popolnim pregledom vseh članov, ter vsi zapisniki, ki so na voljo javnosti?
Will the Commission, in this regard, set up a user-friendly website on which all public calls for applications will be published, all existing expert groups with their full membership attached, as well as all minutes made available to the public?
Če bo, kako bo to izvedla in v kakšnem časovnem razponu?
If so, how will this be done and within what time span?
Če ne bo, ali lahko Komisija navede razloge, zakaj tega ne bo storila?
If not, can the Commission explain why not?
Zakaj se Komisija ni posvetovala s Parlamentom pred sprejetjem svojih končnih odločitev o spremembi okvira, saj je preglednost postala vprašanje skupnega pomena tako za Komisijo kakor za Parlament?
Why has the Commission not consulted Parliament before taking its final decisions on the revision of the framework, since transparency has become an issue of common concern to both the Commission and Parliament?
Ali je Komisija to pripravljena storiti?
Is the Commission willing to do so?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000010/2011
Question for oral answer O-000010/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Praktični vidiki v zvezi z revizijo instrumentov EU za podporo financiranju malih in srednjih podjetij v naslednjem programskem obdobju
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Practical aspects regarding the revision of EU instruments to support SME finance in the next programming period
23 milijonov malih in srednjih podjetij v EU ima bistveno vlogo pri spodbujanju gospodarske raste, socialne kohezije in ustvarjanja delovnih mest.
The 23 million small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the EU play a fundamental role in contributing to economic growth, social cohesion and job creation.
Mala in srednja podjetja so pomemben vir inovacij in imajo osrednji pomen pri ohranjanju in širjenju zaposlovanja v EU.
SMEs are a major source of innovation and are vital for sustaining and expanding employment in the EU.
Evropski finančni trgi zaradi vrste različnih razlogov trenutno niso sposobni zagotoviti oblik financiranja, ki jih potrebujejo mala in srednja podjetja, bodisi zaradi rastoče občutljivosti do tveganj v bančnem sektorju, tržnih neuspehov ter pomanjkanja inovativnih in prilagodljivih instrumentov financiranja bodisi zaradi strukture in zapletenosti sedanjih shem.
For a number of reasons the European financial markets are currently not able to provide SMEs with the forms of finance they need, be it due to a growing risk sensitivity in the banking sector, market failures, a lack of innovative and flexible financing instruments, or the structuring and complexity of existing schemes.
Ali se namerava Komisija bolj osredotočiti na finančne instrumente (dolžniško-lastniške instrumente), ki so primernejši za financiranje tveganja v malih podjetjih (npr. inovacije, prenos poslovanja)?
Does the Commission intend to put a stronger focus on financial instruments (mezzanine instruments), which are better able to finance risk for small enterprises (i.e. innovation, business transfer)?
O katerih pobudah razmišlja Komisija, da bi pomagala pri vzpostavitvi resničnega evropskega trga tveganega kapitala in izboljšanju lastniškega financiranja?
Which initiatives is the Commission considering to help the establishment of a real European venture capital market as well as the enhancement of equity financing?
Kaj je mogoče storiti, da bi iz sedanjih shem pomoči EU odstranili odvečno birokracijo in omogočili višjo udeležbo malih in srednjih podjetij?
What can be done to remove red tape from existing EU support schemes in order to allow for a higher SME participation?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje in se odziva na morebitno tveganje, da bi lahko strožje kapitalske zahteve za banke po začetku veljavnosti sporazuma Basel III otežile dostop malih in srednjih podjetij do bančnih posojil?
How does the Commission evaluate, and respond to, the potential risk that stricter capital requirements for banks following the Basel III agreement could make it more difficult for SMEs to get credit from banks?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000011/2011
Question for oral answer O-000011/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Škandal v zvezi s prisluškovanjem v Bolgariji
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Eavesdropping scandal in Bulgaria
Zadnjih nekaj mesecev je zaradi uporabe posebnih obveščevalnih sredstev v Bolgariji nastala zaskrbljujoča situacija, ki se stopnjuje.
During the last few months there has been a disturbing situation in Bulgaria, resulting from the use of 'special intelligence means' (SIMs), which has recently been escalating.
Bolgarska javnost ni seznanjena s tem, ali so bili izpolnjene zakonske zahteve in ali so bile kršene bolgarska ustava, določbe lizbonske pogodbe, EKČP in listina EU o temeljnih pravicah.
The public in Bulgaria is not clearly aware whether the requirements of the law have been met and whether there have been any breaches of the Bulgarian Constitution, the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty, the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.