natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. januarja 2005 o izidu volitev v Ukrajini Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. decembra 2004 o Ukrajini po drugem krogu predsedniških volitev, ki so ga zaznamovale nepravilnosti Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 28. oktobra 2004 o prihodnjih predsedniških volitvah v Ukrajini 31. oktobra 2004 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o političnih razmerah in neodvisnosti medijev v Belorusiji Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. aprila 2005 o evropski varnostni strategiji, zlasti o sosedski politiki Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. aprila 2005 o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah SZVP, vključno s finančnimi posledicami za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti – 2003 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 28. aprila 2005 o letnem poročilu o človekovih pravicah v svetu v letu 2004 in o politiki Evropske unije v zvezi s tem
European Parliament resolution of 13 January 2005 on the results of the Ukraine elections European Parliament resolution of 2 December 2004 on the situation in Ukraine after the second round of the presidential elections marred by irregularities European Parliament resolution of 14 April 2005 on the European Security Strategy, relating in particular to the neighbourhood policy European Parliament resolution on the political situation and the independence of the media in Belarus European Parliament resolution of 28 October 2004 on the presidential elections in Ukraine on 31 October 2004 European Parliament resolution of 14 April 2005 on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities - 2003 European Parliament resolution of 28 April 2005 on the Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2004 and the EU’s policy on the matter
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0009 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0009 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2004-0074 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2004-0074 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2004-0046 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0133 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0295 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0295 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0133 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2004-0046 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0132 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0132 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0150 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0150 0 NOT XML V0//EN
Finančna perspektiva: Koliko denarja za EU po letu 2007?
Funding the EU after 2007: the next Financial Perspective
Če želi Evropska unija postati pomemben politični in gospodarski akter na svetovnem prizorišču, mora za to zagotoviti potrebna sredstva.
If the European Union wishes to become a political and economic heavyweight in the world arena, it must have the resources to match its ambitions.
To je osrednja tema sedanjih razprav o večletnem finančnem okviru Evrope za obdobje 2007–2013.
This is the crux of the current debate on Europe’s multiannual budget for 2007-2013.
To besedilo je podlaga za pogajalsko izhodišče, ki ga bo zagovarjal Evropski parlament, da zagotovi ustrezno financiranje prihodnjih prednostnih nalog Evropske unije.
The report will form the basis of Parliament’s position for its negotiations with the Council of Ministers, when MEPs will be seeking to ensure that enough funding is provided for the EU’s future priorities.
Ta predlog je bil pripravljen, da omogoči boljše razumevanje ključnih vprašanj prihodnjih finančnih perspektiv.
This Focus explains the key issues.
Za kaj gre pri naslednji finančni perspektivi?
What is the next Financial Perspective about?
Evropski ministri in Parlament v Strasbourgu že od konca 80. let skupaj srednjeročno načrtujejo izdatke Unije.
At the end of the 1980s, EU governments and the European Parliament agreed on a system of medium-term programming for EU expenditure.
Pobudnik tega, da se vlade in evropski poslanci vsako leto ne bi več med seboj prepirali o določitvi financiranja skupnih evropskih politik, je bil Francoz Jacques Delors, tedanji predsednik Evropske komisije.
The initiative for this came from Jacques Delors, the French President of the European Commission at the time, and the aim was to put an end to internal squabbling between governments and MEPs over the amount of money to be allocated each year to EU policies.
Pri teh pogajanjih, v okviru katerih morajo Parlament in države EU najti soglasje, si bodo evropski poslanci zelo prizadevali braniti projekte, za katere menijo, da so bistveni za združitev celine.
During the current negotiations, by the end of which the Parliament and the EU governments must reach agreement, MEPs will be keen to defend projects that they consider crucial to the continuing unification of the continent.
Evropska solidarnost je na primer ključna, da bi nove države članice iz Vzhodne Evrope nadomestile zamudo pri strukturnem razvoju v primerjavi z bolj razvitimi regijami.
European solidarity, for example, is crucial to enable the new Member States from Eastern Europe to catch up with the more advanced regions.
Če EU želi spodbujati rast in konkurirati vedno bolj dinamičnim tekmecem, bo morala zagotoviti tudi ustrezno financiranje za uresničitev ustrezne raziskovalne politike in spodbuditev izobraževanja.
The EU also needs to fund research and education properly in order to stimulate growth and remain competitive against its increasingly dynamic competitors around the world.
Zagotoviti bo morala tudi sredstva za dejavnosti zunaj svojih meja, če želi obdržati položaj velike sile na svetovnem političnem prizorišču.
And it must be generous towards projects beyond its own borders if it wants to remain a major player on the world political scene.
Razprava bo še posebno zahtevna.
The talks will not be easy.
Države, ki v proračun Unije vplačajo več, kot iz njega prejmejo (te države v žargonu Skupnosti imenujemo „neto plačnice“), so že januarja 2004 napovedale svojo namero,da želijo zgornjo mejo izdatkov EU določiti na največ 750 milijard EUR za obdobje od 2007 do 2013.
The countries that pay in more than they receive from the EU budget (known in Community jargon as the ‘net contributors’) set the tone in January 2004 with an announcement that they wanted to impose a ceiling on EU expenditure of €750bn for the period 2007-2013.
Pomemben delež evropskega proračuna je financiran z „nacionalnimi prispevki“, ki prihajajo neposredno iz državnih blagajn držav članic.
The EU budget is financed largely by ‘national contributions’ paid direct from national treasuries.
Vendar evropske vlade poskušajo v obdobju omejitev proračuna zmanjšati izdatke.
But in periods of budgetary austerity, Europe’s governments are tempted to tighten the purse strings.
Nemški krščanskodemokratski poslanec Reimer BÖGE, ki je pripravil priporočilo Parlamenta, dvomi, da bo EU s to splošno mejo zmogla pokriti svoje izdatke.
The German Christian Democrat MEP Reimer Böge, who drafted Parliament’s recommendation, doubts that this overall limit will enable the EU to cover its needs.
Opozoril je, da bo financiranje nekaterih politik lahko okrnjeno, če izdatki Unije ne bodo dosegli vsaj 883 milijard EUR.
He has warned that if EU spending does not reach at least €883bn, funding for some policies will suffer.
Predsednik Parlamenta, španski socialist Josep Borrell, je vlade držav članic opozoril, da Parlament ne bo privolil v znižanje.
The President of the Parliament, Spanish Socialist Josep Borrell, has warned the governments of the 25 Member States that the Parliament will not agree to a penny-pinching deal.
Pričakujemo lahko ostra pogajanja, države EU pa želijo odločitev sprejeti do konca leta.
Although bargaining is likely to be tough, the EU countries are keen to reach agreement by the end of the year.
Parlament je junija sprejel stališče, v katerem zagovarja ambiciozno zastavljeno raven financiranja za proračun Skupnosti.
Parliament adopted its position in June, defending an ambitious level of funding for the Community budget.
Svet pa nasprotno na vrhu 16. in 17. junija ni dosegel dogovora, zlasti zaradi velikih nesoglasij med Francijo in Združenim kraljestvom glede „britanskega rabata“ (glej pogosto zastavljena vprašanja) in skupne kmetijske politike.
The Council, on the other hand, failed to reach an agreement during its summit on 16 and 17 June, mainly owing to the deep divide between France and the United Kingdom over the ‘UK rebate’ (see Frequently Asked Questions) and the Common Agricultural Policy.
Če institucije ne bodo dosegle dogovora do konca leta 2006, sta od leta 2007 naprej, potem ko se bo iztekla sedanja finančna perspektiva, na voljo dve možnosti: obstoječi medinstitucionalni dogovor se lahko podaljša (struktura sedanje finančne perspektive se ohrani, osnove pa se izračunajo glede na zneske v letu 2006), ali pa se medinstitucionalni dogovor prekine: ponovno veljajo določbe, predvidene s pogodbo o letnem proračunskem postopku (glej pogosto zastavljena vprašanja).
If the EU institutions do not manage to strike a deal by the end of 2006, two options are possible from 2007, after the current Financial Perspective expires: either the existing Interinstitutional Agreement is prolonged (preserving the structure of the current Financial Perspective, with the ceilings being calculated on the basis of the 2006 figures); or the Interinstitutional Agreement is abrogated, in which case the EU reverts to the Treaty provisions for the annual budget procedure (see Frequently Asked Questions).
Predlogi Bögejevega poročila
The proposals of the Böge report
Komisija predlaga odobritve plačil v višini 1,14 % (943 milijard EUR) in odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v višini 1,24 % (1022 milijard EUR).
The Commission is proposing payments of 1.14% (€943bn) and commitments of 1.24% (€1 022bn).
Začasni odbor EP:
The temporary committee:
predlaga ustanovitev določenih rezerv zunaj finančnega okvira, da bi se:
is proposing that a number of reserves be established outside the Financial Perspective in order to:
soočili z nepredvidljivimi okoliščinami ali okoliščinami, ki se težko načrtujejo vnaprej (kohezija, nujna pomoč, solidarnostni skladi, jamstveni skladi)
cope with contingencies or situations that are difficult to anticipate (cohesion, emergency aid, solidarity fund, guarantee fund),
olajšala gospodarska prilagoditev EU na področju konkurenčnosti.
assist the EU to make economic adjustments designed to boost competitiveness.
Cilj te strategije je zagotoviti večjo prilagodljivosti delovanja Unije.
The aim of the strategy is to help the EU operate more flexibly.
Dejansko se zdi pristop začasnega odbora ob upoštevanju omejitev nacionalnih proračunov realen.
Against a background of national budgetary constraints, the temporary committee has sought to be realistic.
Načrtuje le najnujnejše in skuša EU omogočiti, da se, kadar je potrebno, odzove na humanitarne, gospodarske ali družbene nujne primere in učinkoviteje ukrepa v okviru lizbonske strategije.
It has programmed only the budgetary areas which really need to be programmed, and has tried to enable the EU to respond when necessary to humanitarian, economic or social emergencies and take more effective action to boost the Lisbon strategy.
Če bi bila ERS in rezerve vključena v finančno perspektivo, bi Bögejevo poročilo predlagalo dejansko enako raven izdatkov kot Evropska komisija v svojem prvotnem predlogu.
If the EDF and the reserves had been incorporated into the Financial Perspective, the funding level set in the Böge report would have been virtually identical to what the Commission proposed.
Razdelek 1: konkurenčnost in kohezija za spodbujanje rasti in zaposlovanja.
Heading 1: Competitiveness and cohesion to boost growth and employment
Skupen obseg sredstev, ki ga predlaga začasni odbor: 459 milijard EUR
Total funding proposed by the temporary committee: €459bn
Glavne politike
Main policies
vseevropska omrežja
Trans-European networks
izobraževanje in usposabljanje
Education and training
socialna politika
Social policy
čezmejno sodelovanje
Cross-border cooperation
Konkurenčnost : financiranje raziskav mora biti „ poenostavljeno “, medtem ko je „ ambiciozno zastavljen“ program skupaj z ustreznimi sredstvi bistven za zagotovitev blaginje, menijo poslanci.
Competitiveness: MEPs believe research funding needs be ‘ simplified ’ but also that an ‘ ambitious ’ and adequately resourced programme for competitiveness and innovation is vital to create prosperity.
Glede Agende o socialni politiki poslanci ocenjujejo, da je potrebno povečanje za 200 milijonov EUR (v primerjavi s predlogi Evropske komisije), zlasti za dosego lizbonskih ciljev in spodbujanje zaposlovanja.
And they want a €200m increase for the social policy agenda (over and above what the Commission has proposed), mainly to help achieve the Lisbon objectives and stimulate employment.
Kohezija: regionalna politika se obravnava kot „ nujno potrebna “ za spodbujanje gospodarske in socialne kohezije EU.
Cohesion: Regional policy is seen as ‘ indispensable ’ for stimulating EU economic and social cohesion.
Zato poslanci vztrajajo, da se proračunska sredstva iz drugega stebra postavke, ki so dodeljena kohezijski politiki, „ porabijo izključno v ta namen “, da se podprejo rast, zaposlovanje in trajni razvoj ter zmanjšajo razlike med različnimi regijami EU.
MEPs are therefore urging that cohesion funding be ‘ used exclusively for that purpose ’ in order to support growth, employment and sustainable development and above all to reduce disparities between EU regions.
Parlamentarni odbor ocenjuje, da bi moralo financiranje na tem področju doseči 0,41 % BND EU in da bi morale nove države članice EU prejemati do 4 % njihovega BND za financiranje projektov, povezanih s temi politikami.
The temporary committee argues that financing in this area should total 0.41% of EU GNI and that the new Member States should be allowed to use up to 4% of their GNI for projects in those policy areas.
Ta meja 4 % BND pa mora biti obravnavana na bolj „ prilagodljiv “ način, t.j. ta meja se lahko preseže, če država pokaže večjo sposobnost črpanja sredstev Skupnosti.
However, the 4% GNI ceiling ought to be handled in a more ‘ elastic ’ fashion, i.e. this figure could be exceeded if a country showed it could absorb more Community funding.
Poslanci poleg tega priporočajo uvedbo prehodnega mehanizma za regije, ki so prizadete zaradi „statističnega učinka“ (padejo pod raven upravičenosti do strukturnih skladov) in ki načeloma ne bi bile upravičene do teh sredstev.
MEPs also call for the introduction of a transitional mechanism for regions hit by the ‘statistical effect’ and hence no longer qualifying for structural funds (i.e. regions which have fallen below the eligibility thresholds for structural aid).
Razdelek 2: varovanje in upravljanje naravnih virov
Heading 2: Preservation and management of natural resources
Skupen obseg sredstev, ki ga predlaga začasni odbor: 396,2 milijarde EUR
Total funding proposed by the temporary committee: €396.2bn
kmetijski izdatki
Agricultural market support & direct payments
razvoj podeželja
Rural development
varovanje okolja
Protection of the environment
Poslanci menijo, da so zneski znotraj drugega razdelka prihodnje finančne perspektive, ki jih Evropska komisija predvideva za sklad za razvoj podeželja, izjemno nizki, pravzaprav minimalni.
Within heading 2 of the Financial Perspective, MEPs regard the sums earmarked for the Rural Development Fund by the Commission as very low – in fact as a bare minimum.
Prav tako menijo, da bi probleme podeželja deloma lahko rešili z zagotavljanjem pomoči podjetjem, ki bodo pomagala povečati raznolikost gospodarstva.
They believe the problems of rural areas can in part be addressed by supporting businesses that help diversify the economy.
Začasni odbor predlaga tudi, da se za program Natura 2000 (biološka raznolikost in zaščita naravnih življenjskih prostorov) dodeli 21 milijard EUR.
And they propose allocating €21bn to Natura 2000 (a programme for the biodiversity and protection of natural habitats).
Poslanci nasprotujejo vsaki renacionalizaciji skupne kmetijske politike in podpirajo možnost uvedbe postopnega sofinanciranja kmetijskih izdatkov v EU-15, če bodo potrebe presegle razpoložljiva sredstva po priključitvi Bolgarije in Romunije, ki je predvidena za 1. januar 2007.
MEPs are opposed to renationalising the Common Agricultural Policy but back the phasing-in of cofinancing for agricultural expenditure within the EU-15 if needs outstrip the resources available after the accession of Bulgaria and Romania (scheduled for 1 January 2007).
Treba je vedeti, da so se voditelji držav in vlad EU oktobra 2002 dogovorili, da bodo za zgornjo mejo kmetijskih izdatkov določili 293 milijard EUR.
It should be remembered that the heads of state and government agreed in October 2002 to set the ceiling for agriculture expenditure at €293bn.
Postavka 3: državljanstvo, svoboda, varnost in pravica
Heading 3: Citizenship, freedom, security and justice
Skupen obseg sredstev, ki ga predlaga začasni odbor: 19,4 milijarde EUR
Total funding proposed by the temporary committee: €19.4bn
azil in priseljevanje
Asylum and immigration
zunanje meje
External borders
pravica in temeljne pravice
Justice and fundamental rights
zdravstvo in varovanje potrošnikov
Health and consumer protection
kultura in mladi
Culture and youth
Uresničevanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice je ena od prednostnih nalog novega finančnega načrtovanja.
The area of freedom, security and justice is a priority of the new financial planning arrangements.
Zato začasni odbor meni, da je povečanje za 1 milijardo EUR v primerjavi s predlogom Evropske komisije „ potrebno za dosego ciljev “ na tem področju, hkrati pa je treba predvideti „ ustrezno mejo odstopanja“ za nepredvidljive potrebe.
The temporary committee believes that a €1bn increase above what the Commission has proposed is ‘ necessary in order to attain its goals ’, while making provision for a ‘ sufficient margin ’ for unforeseen needs.
Europol, evropski policijski urad, in Eurojust, zametek evropskega državnega tožilstva, bi morala dobiti več proračunskih sredstev, saj je boj proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu sedaj prednostna naloga.
Europol (the European Police Office) and Eurojust (an embryonic European public prosecutor’s office) ought to receive increased funding as the fight against organised crime and terrorism is now a priority.
Druga povečanja financiranja so predlagana za programe, povezane z mladimi in kulturo.
Other funding increases are proposed for youth and culture programmes.
Postavka 4: EU kot svetovni akter
Heading 4: The EU on the world stage
Skupen obseg sredstev, ki ga predlaga začasni odbor: 70,6 milijarde EUR
Total funding proposed by the temporary committee: €70.6bn
sosedski odnosi EU
Neighbourhood policy of the EU
človekoljubna pomoč
Humanitarian aid
razvojno in gospodarsko sodelovanje
Development and economic cooperation
V zvezi s tem razdelkom, ki je bil v obdobju 2000–2006 premalo financiran, se poslanci zavzemajo za večjo prilagodljivost (glej spodaj) pri soočanju z novimi potrebami in za ustrezno financiranje ključnih področij, kot je sosedska politika.
For this heading, which was underfunded in 2000-2006, MEPs are calling for more flexibility (see below) to meet new needs and for adequate funding for key areas such as the new neighbourhood policy.
V zvezi s tem bi morala Unija okrepiti svoj vpliv na Sredozemlju in načrtovati strategijo Baltskega morja, ki vključuje Rusijo kot enakovrednega partnerja.
They say the EU needs to strengthen its influence in the Mediterranean and envisage a Baltic Sea strategy that involves Russia as an equal partner.
Poslanci zahtevajo posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom vsakokrat, ko zunanji ukrepi EU vplivajo na proračun.
MEPs also want to be consulted on any EU external action which has budgetary implications.
Glede pomoči za sodelovanje je treba po mnenju poslancev razlikovati med državami v razvoju in industrijskimi državami.
Lastly, with regard to cooperation aid, a distinction must be made between developing and industrialised countries.
Prilagodljivost in rezerve
Flexibility and reserves
V novi obliki bo ta instrument, ki predstavlja del medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, „ o katerem se ni mogoče pogajati “, financiran s prerazporeditvami v različnih razdelkih finančne perspektive, prerazporeditvijo neporabljenih proračunskih sredstev znotraj razdelka in med različnimi razdelki, ali če prvi dve možnosti nista izvedljivi, z dodatnimi proračunskimi sredstvi.
In its new form this instrument, which is regarded as a ‘ non-negotiable part ’ of the Interinstitutional Agreement, will be financed by reallocations within the various Financial Perspective headings, redeployment of unused funds within and between headings or, if the first two options are not possible, an injection of additional funding.
V zvezi z rezervami začasni odbor predlaga oblikovanje rezerve za konkurenčnost (največ 7 milijard EUR, ki nadomešča sklad za prilagoditev rasti), rezerve za kohezijo (3 milijarde), nujno pomoč (1,5 milijarde) in solidarnostni sklad (6,2 milijarde).
Turning to reserves, the temporary committee proposes the creation of reserves for competitiveness (capped at €7bn and replacing the Growth Adjustment Fund), cohesion (€3bn), emergency aid (€1.5bn) and the Solidarity Fund (€6.2bn).
Pogosto zastavljena vprašanja
Frequently asked questions
Kaj se bo zgodilo, če pogajanja ne bodo uspešna?
What happens if the negotiations break down?
Če Evropski parlament in petindvajset držav članic EU ne bo pravočasno doseglo dogovora o prihodnji finančni perspektivi (ob upoštevanju, da sedanji finančni okvir poteče konec leta 2006), sta na voljo dve možnosti:
If the twenty-five EU governments and the European Parliament do not agree in time on the next Financial Perspective (bearing in mind that the current FP expires at the end of 2006), two options can be envisaged:
Medinstitucionalni dogovor se podaljša: zgornje meje za leto 2006, zadnje leto sedanje finančne perspektive, se bodo prilagodile, tako da se bodo sedanjim zneskom dodale povprečne stopnje povečanja v prejšnjem obdobju, izvzete pa so prilagoditve, ki so posledica širitve Unije.
The current Interinstitutional Agreement could be prolonged : The ceilings for 2006, the final year covered by the current FP, would be adjusted by applying the average rate of increase over the preceding period, excluding enlargement-related adjustments.
Stopnja povečanja ne more preseči stopnje rasti BNP Skupnosti, predvidene za zadevno leto.
However, this rate could not exceed the expected growth rate of Community GNI.
Različne kategorije izdatkov se ohranijo.
The existing expenditure categories of the FP would be preserved.
Tako ima Parlament več manevrskega prostora za neobvezne izdatke.
This would give the EP more room for manoeuvre on non-compulsory expenditure.
Razdelki finančne perspektive so odpravljeni in proračun sedaj zagotavlja le sredstva za obvezne izdatke, večinoma kmetijske (za katere je odgovoren samo Svet), in neobvezne izdatke (glede katerih ima EP zadnjo besedo).
The budget would be divided into ‘compulsory’ expenditure (mainly agriculture, on which the Council has the final say) and ‘non-compulsory’ expenditure (on which Parliament has the final word) which would be calculated according to the maximum rate of increase.
Nadaljevanje večletnih programov je praktično nemogoče, kar ima neposredne posledice za upravičence sredstev Skupnosti, kot so raziskovalci, študenti, regije z omejenimi možnostmi, ki potrebujejo proračunska sredstva za svoje načrte posodobitve.
Even with an annual budget, multi-annual programming would be possible either with ad hoc agreement between Council and Parliament on the financing or with the annual confirmation of the amounts, on the assumption that the legislative programs will be adopted.
Ali bo britanski rabat ukinjen?
Will the UK rebate be abolished?