natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kam natančno bodo prerazporejena sredstva evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva, dodeljena programu za Baltsko morje, če Belorusija ne bo mogla sodelovati?
Where exactly will the ENPI budget allocated to the Baltic Sea Programme be transferred in the event that Belarus is unable to take it up?
Če bodo sredstva instrumenta prerazporejena in dodeljena kakšnemu drugemu programu čezmejnega sodelovanja in se bo odstotek sredstev instrumenta v določenem programu čezmejnega sodelovanja povečal, ali se bo povečal tudi odstotek sredstev ESRR za isti program?
If that ENPI budget is transferred to another CBC programme, so that the percentage of the ENPI budget is increased in that specific CBC programme, will the ERDF percentage of that specific CBC programme also be increased?
Ali bi bilo potrebno boljše usklajevanje postopkov, da bi se izognili dvojnemu financiranju med programi čezmejnega sodelovanja iz instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva in drugimi programi iz tega instrumenta?
Would there be a need to better coordinate procedures to avoid duplication of financing between ENPI CBC programmes and other ENPI programmes?
Ali so dokaj neuspešni razpisi za zbiranje predlogov posledica togih izvedbenih pravil instrumenta?
Has the poor performance in the launch of calls for proposals been a consequence of the inflexibility of the ENPI implementing rules?
Ali Komisija razmišlja o poenostavitvi postopka?
Is the Commission thinking about simplifying this procedure?
Ima Komisija glede na rezultate izvajanja programov čezmejnega sodelovanja v obdobju 2007–2010 konkretne predloge za drugačen pristop pri njihovem financiranje v prihodnjih letih?
In view of the results of implementation of the CBC programmes during the period 2007-2010, does the Commission have concrete proposals for a revised approach by the ENPI for the coming years?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0099/2010
Question for oral answer O-0099/2010
v imenu skupine EFD Zadeva: Izvajanje člena 174 Lizbonske pogodbe
on behalf of the EFD Group Subject: Implementation of Article 174 of the Lisbon Treaty
V členu 174 Lizbonske pogodbe piše, da se med regijami, ki jih zadeva politika ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije, posebna pozornost namenja „regijam, ki so hudo in stalno prizadete zaradi neugodnih naravnih ali demografskih razmer, kot so najsevernejše regije z zelo nizko gostoto prebivalstva, ter otoškim, čezmejnim in gorskim regijam“.
Article 174 of the Lisbon Treaty states that among the regions concerned by the policy of economic, social and territorial cohesion, particular attention is to be paid to ‘regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps such as the northernmost regions with very low population density and island, cross-border and mountain regions’.
Kako namerava Komisija izvajati nove zahteve člena 174 glede regij z zelo nizko gostoto prebivalstva ter otoških in gorskih regij, zlasti pri oblikovanju novih finančnih perspektiv?
How does the Commission intend to implement the new requirements of Article 174 relating to sparsely populated areas, islands and mountain regions, particularly as regards the drafting of the new financial perspectives?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0100/2010
Question for oral answer O-0100/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Povrnitev stroškov za volilno kampanjo za evropske volitve
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Reimbursement of European election campaign expenses
Italijanski tisk je ta teden v več člankih poudaril, da je politična stranka, zastopana v Evropskem parlamentu, zlorabila javna sredstva za povračilo stroškov za volilno kampanjo na zadnjih evropskih volitvah.
Several articles in the Italian press this week have highlighted the fact that a political party represented in the European Parliament has misused public funds intended to cover the reimbursement of expenses incurred in the last European election campaign.
Zdi se, da so bila ta posebna sredstva uporabljena za zasebne namene in izplačana na račun zasebnega združenja.
It seems that monies from this specific fund have been used for private purposes and paid into the account of a private association.
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi več podrobnejših informacij o spoštovanju nacionalne zakonodaje o financiranju povračila stroškov za volilne kampanje za evropske volitve ter upoštevanju pravnih in zakonodajnih načel, ki so neločljiv del pravnega reda EU?
Can the Commission give more comprehensive and detailed information concerning compliance with national laws on funding to reimburse expenses incurred in European election campaigns and observance of the legal and legislative principles that are an integral part of the ‘EU acquis ’?
Glede na to, da gre za javno financiranje povračila stroškov za kampanjo za evropske volitve, ali lahko Komisija preveri morebitno pristojnost Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam?
Given that these public funds are intended to cover the reimbursement of expenses incurred in the European election campaign, can the Commission verify whether OLAF may be competent to investigate this matter?
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi predlog, namenjen uskladitvi pravil o povračilu stroškov za volilno kampanjo za naslednje evropske volitve?
Could the Commission submit a proposal to coordinate the rules on reimbursement of electoral campaign expenses in time for the next European elections?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0101/2010
Question for oral answer O-0101/2010
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Globe Komisije v primerih monopolov
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Commission fines in antitrust cases
V skladu s členom 23(2)(a) uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 lahko Komisija podjetjem, ki kršijo člen 101 ali 102 Pogodbe, naloži globo.
Pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 , the Commission may impose fines on undertakings which infringe Articles 101 or 102 of the Treaty.
Čeprav ima pri tem precejšnjo svobodo presoje, je treba s smernicami za metode določanja globe zagotoviti preglednost vseh njenih odločitev.
While the Commission can impose fines within a wide margin of discretion, the guidelines on the method of setting fines must ensure transparency of any Commission decision taken.
V zadnjem desetletju so se globe, ki jih je naložila Komisija, izjemno povišale.
Over the last decade the fines imposed by the Commission have become enormously high.
Kritiki trdijo, da kaznovalna politika Komisije ne spoštuje pravne varnosti in temeljnih zakonskih pravic.
Critics have argued that the Commission’s fining policy does not respect legal certainty and fundamental legal rights.
Še zlasti se pritožujejo, da ima Komisija pri določanju glob skoraj povsem proste roke, zato vpletena podjetja ne morejo predvideti, kolikšna kazen jim bo naložena.
In particular it has been claimed that the fining policy is exercised with almost unlimited discretion, making it impossible for the undertakings concerned to predict the level of the fines to be imposed.
Omenjena kaznovalna politika je zaradi trenutne finančne in gospodarske krize verjetno tudi nesorazmerna.
The Commission’s current fining policy may also be disproportionate in the current financial and economic crisis.
Čeprav zlasti odstavek 35 smernic za določanje globe Komisiji omogoča, da v izjemnih primerih in na zahtevo upošteva nezmožnost podjetja za plačilo zaradi posebnih družbenih in gospodarskih razmer, ni jasno, v kolikšni meri namerava Komisija to pravilo v sedanji gospodarski situaciji upoštevati oziroma zmanjšati globe na drug način.
Although paragraph 35 in particular of the fining guidelines enables the Commission, in exceptional cases and upon request, to take account of an undertaking’s inability to pay in a specific social and economic context, it is unclear to what extent the Commission intends to apply this rule or reduce fines by any other means in the given economic situation.
Ali namerava Komisija revidirati pravila o določanju glob?
Does the Commission intend to revise its rules on the imposition of fines?
Ali namerava predlagati uradno zakonodajo, namesto da svojo politiko kaznovanja utemeljuje na upravnih smernicah?
Does the Commission intend to put forward formal legislation instead of basing its fining policy on administrative guidelines?
Ali namerava pri določanju zneska globe upoštevati trenutno finančno in gospodarsko krizo, da oglobljenim podjetjem zato ne bo grozila insolventnost?
Does the Commission intend to take account of the current financial and economic crisis in determining the level of a fine in order to ensure that the undertakings fined are not threatened by insolvency?
Ul L 1, 4.1.2003, str.
OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0102/2010
Question for oral answer O-0102/2010
v imenu Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve Zadeva: Dolgoročna oskrba starejših
on behalf of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Subject: Long-term care for older people
Med demografskimi spremembami v Evropski uniji je tudi daljšanje življenjske dobe in naraščanje deleža starejših.
Demographic change in the European Union includes increased longevity and a growth in the proportion of older people.
Socialna solidarnost zahteva, da zagotovimo ustrezne razmere za aktivno staranje, dostojno življenje in kakovostno oskrbo starejših v EU.
Social solidarity requires that we guarantee the conditions for active ageing, dignity of life and the provision of quality care for older people in the European Union.
Z daljšanjem življenjske dobe naraščajo tudi potrebe po socialnem in zdravstvenem varstvu v ustanovah, skupnosti in doma.
As we live longer, the need for social and health care in institutional settings, in the community, and in the home also increases.
Pri ukrepanju v takšnih razmerah je bistvenega pomena, da starejše zaščitimo pred grdim ravnanjem v skupnosti in v vseh ustanovah za oskrbo.
Safeguarding older people against elder abuse in the community and all care settings is an essential component of this response.
Skoraj v vseh državah članicah se prebivalstvo v splošnem stara, zaradi česar je ogroženo trajnostno zagotavljanje oskrbe starejših, saj bi lahko močno povečanje potreb po teh storitvah v državah članicah ogrozilo dosedanje sisteme za financiranje oskrbe.
Almost all the Member States have a population that is ageing across the board, a fact which in itself constitutes a danger to the future sustainability of their care provision for older people, given that a steep increase in service needs could jeopardise the systems they have used until now to finance the services concerned.
Kakšne podatke ima Komisija o infrastrukturi za institucionalno, skupnostno in domačo oskrbo starejših v posameznih državah članicah?
What data does the Commission have regarding the infrastructure for the provision of institutional, community and home care for older people in the individual Member States?
Kako Evropska komisija ocenjuje svojo morebitno vlogo pri prihodnjem oblikovanju in širjenju zgledov iz prakse pri zagotavljanju dolgoročne oskrbe starejših?
What role does the European Commission believe it can play in establishing and disseminating best practice with regard to the provision of long-term care for older people?
Kakšno vlogo bi lahko po mnenju Komisije imelo evropsko leto aktivnega staranja in medgeneracijske solidarnosti za evropske državljane, zlasti starejše, pri spodbujanju aktivnega staranja, zmanjševanju diskriminacije starejših ter boljšem zagotavljanju skupnostne in institucionalne oskrbe?
What role does the Commission consider the European Year for Active Ageing and Intergenerational Solidarity can play for European citizens, especially older people, in promoting active ageing, reducing discrimination against older people and improving the provision of community-based and institutional care?
Čeprav večino nege in oskrbe starejših zagotavljajo neplačani negovalci in oskrbovalci, namreč sorodniki, prijatelji in sosedi, se pri storitvah in politiki oskrbe njihove potrebe in koristi ne upoštevajo.
Despite the fact that the vast majority of care for older people is being provided by unpaid carers – relatives, friends and neighbours – care services and policies do not take account of their needs and interests.
Ali namerava Komisija sprejeti posebne ukrepe, s katerimi bo zagotovila, da se bo prispevek negovalcev dejansko priznal in upošteval v politikah ter pobudah, ki zadevajo zagotavljanje oskrbe?
Does the Commission intend to take specific action to ensure that the contribution of carers is being actively recognised and taken into account in policies and initiatives that have a bearing on care provision?
Ali namerava ustanoviti opazovalno skupino za aktivno staranje, ki bo skrbela za širjenje dobre prakse, kar zadeva vključevanje starejših v kulturne in družbene dejavnosti ter oblikovanje pobud, kot je prostovoljno delo starejših ali vseživljenjsko učenje?
Does it intend to set up an ‘Active Ageing Observatory’ with a view to disseminating good practices regarding involvement of the elderly in cultural and social activities and the development of initiatives such as voluntary work for the elderly or lifelong learning?
Ali Komisija lahko zagotovi raziskave, podatke ali informacije o številnih smrtnih primerih zaradi podhranjenosti ali dehidracije pri starejših, ki so bili v oskrbi?
What research, data or information can the Commission provide on the number of deaths among older people in care that are attributable to malnutrition or dehydration?
Kako Komisija preverja uporabo tako imenovanih navodil o opustitvi oživljanja kot sredstva za odrekanje zdravljenja in oskrbe starejših?
What is the Commission doing to look at the use of so-called ‘do not resuscitate orders’ as a means of withholding treatment and care from older people?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da takšna praksa krši pravico do življenja, kakor je določena v členu 2 listine o temeljnih pravicah?
Does the Commission agree that such practices violate the right to life, as established in Article 2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da odločitev o opustitvi oživljanja državljanov EU ne bi smela biti sprejeta na podlagi starosti, ampak bi morala temeljiti na zdravstveni oceni kakovosti nadaljnjega življenja, in da je treba takšno odločitev sprejeti ob posvetovanju s starejšo osebo in njeno ožjo družino?
Does the Commission agree that decisions not to resuscitate EU citizens should not be taken on the basis of age, but on a medical assessment of the quality of life afterwards, and that such decisions should be taken in consultation with the older person and their immediate family?
Ali lahko Komisija oriše delo, ki ga je opravila glede odkrivanja razširjenosti grdega ravnanja s starejšimi v državah članicah Evropske unije, in ali je na podlagi svojih raziskav določila primere najboljše prakse za varstvo starejših v skupnosti in v ustanovah za oskrbo?
Can the Commission outline the work that it has done to uncover levels of elder abuse in Member States of the European Union and has the Commission identified any examples of best practice for safeguarding older people in the community and in care settings from its research?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je nujno potreben kodeks ravnanja za vso EU, ki bi ga morala sprejeti Evropski parlament in Svet ministrov in bi določal minimalne poklicne predpise, smernice in minimalne izide pri zagotavljanju dolgotrajne oskrbe?
Does the Commission agree that there is an urgent need for an EU-wide Code of Conduct suggesting minimum professional regulations, guidelines and outcomes of services for the provision of long-term care to be adopted by the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers?
Kakšna naj bi bila po mnenju Komisije vloga neformalnega zagotavljanja dolgotrajne oskrbe starejših?
What role does the Commission see for the informal provision of long-term care for the elderly?
Ali zagotavljanje neformalne oskrbe vpliva na zaposlovanje?
Does the provision of informal care have any impact on employment?
Kakšne ukrepe bi lahko sprejeli, da bi spodbujali oskrbo, ki bi jo zagotavljali oskrbovančevi bližnji sorodniki?
What measures can be taken to encourage the provision of care by those closest to the recipient?
Ali ima Komisija podatke o vplivu revščine, ki je zelo razširjena med starejšimi, na kakovost njihove oskrbe in dolžino njihovega življenja?
Does the Commission have information concerning the impact of widespread poverty among the elderly on the quality of care they receive and on their longevity?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0103/2010
Question for oral answer O-0103/2010
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Rastoče grožnje za svobodo obveščanja in tiska v državah članicah EU in ukrepi, ki jih načrtuje Komisija
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Growing threats to freedom of information and media freedom in EU Member States and action planned by the Commission
Kot se je že zgodilo na Češkem in v Italiji, se sedaj tudi na Madžarskem, v Estoniji in v Romuniji razpravlja o uvedbi strogih omejitev glede svobode obveščanja in tiska, ki bi vladam dopuščale, da določajo vsebino, cenzurirajo kritiko in okrepijo svoj nadzor nad mediji.
After the Czech Republic and Italy, Hungary, Estonia and Romania are also discussing severe restrictions on freedom of information and of the media, aimed at granting governments powers to determine content, censor criticism and increase governmental control over the media.
Osnutek zakona, ki ga je oblikovala vlada na Madžarskem, predvideva ustanovitev sveta za medije pod okriljem vlade, ki bi nadzoroval javne medije in katerega vodjo bi imenoval predsednik vlade.
In Hungary a draft government law provides for the setting up of a government-backed ‘media council’ to control the public media, whose leader is to be appointed by the prime minister.
Estonski parlament razpravlja o predlogu novega zakona, po katerem bi bili novinarji dolžni razkriti svoje vire, časopisi pa bi bili kaznovani, če bi bili osumljeni načrtovanja objave „morebitno škodljivih informacij”.
In Estonia the parliament is discussing a proposal for a new law forcing journalists to reveal their sources and imposing fines on newspapers on the grounds of the suspected intention to publish ‘potentially harmful information’.
V Romuniji pa je vrhovni svet za obrambo parlamentu v zakonodajni postopek poslal novo nacionalno obrambno strategijo, v kateri je izpostavljen pojav medijskih kampanj, katerih cilj je „očrniti vladne institucije s širjenjem lažnih informacij o njihovih dejavnostih”.
In Romania the Supreme Defence Council has forwarded to the parliament for legislative action the new national defence strategy, which points at ‘the phenomenon of ordered media campaigns aiming at denigrated State institutions by spreading false information on their activities’.
Zaskrbljujoča je tudi revizija zakonodaje o javni radioteleviziji.
Concerns have also been raised regarding the review of legislation on public broadcasting.
Madžarski, estonski in romunski novinarji in založniki ob podpori svojih kolegov iz drugih evropskih držav nasprotujejo takšnim načrtom, ki po njihovem mnenju ogrožajo svobodo tiska v njihovih državah in nevarno spominjajo na stare čase.
Hungarian, Estonian and Romanian journalists and publishers, supported by their counterparts in other European countries, have criticised such moves as blows to media freedom in their respective countries, which dangerously turn back the clock.
Ali Komisija meni, da so omenjeni osnutki zakonov združljivi z evropskimi standardi glede svobode obveščanja in tiska, ki jih predpisujejo člen 11 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah, člen 10 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in z njo povezana sodna praksa ter člen 6 PEU?
Does the Commission think that such draft laws are compatible with European standards on freedom of information and of the media, as guaranteed by Article 11 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 10 of the ECHR with the related jurisprudence, and Article 6 TEU?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je svoboda tiska temeljni element demokracije, ki jo morajo EU in njene institucije varovati, tudi, če je potrebno, z uveljavljanjem člena 7 PEU?
Does the Commission agree that media freedom is a fundamental element of democracy that the EU and its institutions must protect, including, if necessary, by activating Article 7 TEU?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi zagotovila ustrezno in dosledno izvajanje celotne zakonodaje na področjih notranjega trga, avdiovizualne politike, konkurence, telekomunikacij, državnih subvencij, obveznosti javnih služb in temeljnih pravic?
What action will the Commission take to ensure proper and full enforcement of all relevant legislation in the areas of the internal market, audiovisual policy, competition, telecommunications, State subsidies, public service obligation and fundamental rights?
Kdaj bo objavljeno sporočilo o kazalcih pluralnosti medijev, ki je bilo napovedano za leto 2010, in kakšni bodo naslednji koraki?
When will the communication on media pluralism indicators (announced for 2010) be issued and what will the next steps be?
Ali bo med njimi še zlasti revizija direktive o televiziji brez meja, da bosta vanjo vključena svoboda tiska in pluralnost medijev?
In particular, will it propose a revision of the TV without Frontiers Directive to include freedom of the media and media pluralism?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-0104/2010
Question for oral answer O-0104/2010
Zadeva: Sporazumi Skupnosti s tretjimi državami o ponovnem sprejemu
Subject: Community readmission agreements with third countries
Evropska unija je do danes podpisala 11 sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu.
The European Union is currently a signatory to 11 readmission agreements.
Pogajanja so stekla še za 7 drugih sporazumov, po katerih sta dva (s Pakistanom in Gruzijo) v fazi sprejemanja, eden (s Turčijo) pa bo podpisan v kratkem.
It has entered into negotiation on seven more: two (Pakistan and Georgia) are on the point of being concluded, and one (Turkey) is to be signed very shortly.
Ti sporazumi so postali osrednje orodje Unije za „brzdanje toka“ migrantov z neurejenim statusom.
These agreements have become the main Community instrument with which to ‘contain the flow’ of illegal migrants.
Od začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe ima Evropski parlament večja pooblastila pri odobritvah mednarodnih sporazumov.
Since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament has increased powers in the matter of consent to international agreements.
Katera jamstva lahko Komisija da Evropskemu parlamentu glede preglednosti in pravice do obveščenosti pri pogajanjih o teh sporazumih?
What guarantees can the Commission give Parliament in terms of transparency and the right to be informed on the process of negotiating these agreements?
Katera jamstva lahko Komisija ponudi v primerih, ko te države niso podpisnice Ženevske ali drugih konvencij o varstvu temeljnih pravic?
What guarantees can the Commission offer in cases where the countries involved have not signed the Geneva Convention or other conventions relating to protection of fundamental rights?
Ali naj ne bi bil podpis teh konvencij pogoj za podpis takšnih sporazumov?
Should signing these conventions not be a necessary precursor to signing the agreements?
Glede na to, da v Evropi ni enotnega azilnega sistema in je zavračanje migrantov vedno možno, se zdi to nujno potrebno.
Given the absence of a uniform asylum system in Europe and the constant possibility of refoulement, this seems indispensable.
Kako naj kot zakonodajni organ razsodno odobri takšne sporazume, ne da bi – vse od uveljavitve prvega tovrstnega sporazuma leta 2004 – imel na razpolago kakršno koli podrobno oceno učinkovitosti teh instrumentov in ne da bi lahko spremljal njihovo uresničevanje?
How is it possible, as a legislative authority, to approve such agreements in full possession of the facts without ever, since the entry into force of the first agreement of this kind in 2004, having seen any evidence-based evaluation of the effectiveness of such instruments and the consequences of their implementation?