natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali Svet lahko navede, katere ukrepe je Evropska unija sprejela za končanje grozodejstev v provinci Darfur ter za zadovoljitev humanitarnih potreb prebivalstva?
Can the Council state what action the European Union has taken to bring an end to the atrocities committed in the Darfor region and to meet the humanitarian needs of the population?
Kakšna je ocena dosedanjega sodelovanja z Afriško unijo?
How effective has the cooperation with the African Union been thus far?
Ali Svet lahko pove, če se mu za vzpostavitev in ohranjanje miru zdi primerna uporaba vojske?
Can the Council state whether it would regard the deployment of military forces with a view to restoring and maintaining peace as appropriate?
Če da, kakšni naj bi bili pogoji za njeno uporabo?
If so, on what basis should such a deployment be carried out?
Ali Svet ocenjuje, da je podpis mirovne pogodbe med sudansko vlado in SPLM (Gibanje za osvoboditev sudanskega ljudstva), sicer zelo zaželen, zadosten pogoj za ponoven začetek popolnega sodelovanja s Sudanom, kljub temu da kriza v Darfurju še ni končana?
Does the Council regard the signing of a peace agreement between the Sudanese Government and the SPLM - although very desirable in itself - as an adequate basis for the resumption of full cooperation with Sudan pending a resolution of the Darfor crisis?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0034/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0034/04
Ali Komisija lahko navede, katere ukrepe je Evropska unija sprejela za končanje grozodejstev v provinci Darfur ter za zadovoljitev humanitarnih potreb prebivalstva?
Can the Commission state what action the European Union has taken to bring an end to the atrocities committed in the Darfor region and to meet the humanitarian needs of the population?
Ali Komisija lahko pove, če se ji za vzpostavitev in ohranjanje miru zdi primerna uporaba vojske?
Can the Commission state whether it would regard the deployment of military forces with a view to restoring and maintaining peace as appropriate?
Ali Komisija ocenjuje, da je podpis mirovne pogodbe med sudansko vlado in SPLM (Gibanje za osvoboditev sudanskega ljudstva), sicer zelo zaželen, zadosten pogoj za ponoven začetek popolnega sodelovanja s Sudanom, kljub temu da kriza v Darfurju še ni končana?
Does the Commission regard the signing of a peace agreement between the Sudanese Government and the SPLM - although very desirable in itself - as an adequate basis for the resumption of full cooperation with Sudan pending a resolution of the Darfor crisis?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0035/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0035/04
, v imenu Odbor za ustavne zadeve
, on behalf of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs
Zadeva: Ratifikacijski postopki Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo
Subject: Ratification procedures for the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
Kako nameravajo Svet ali države članice delovati glede:
What action are the Council or the Member States considering with regard to
omogočanja skupnega pristopa držav članic in, če je možno, usklajevanja časovnega razporeda ratifikacije Ustave za Evropo?
facilitating a common approach to the Member States and, where possible, a coordinated timetable for the ratification of the Constitution for Europe?
oblikovanja splošne komunikacijske strategije za pozitivni izid ratifikacijskih postopkov Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo?
the elaboration of a communication strategy aiming at a positive outcome of the ratification procedures for the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0036/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0036/04
Zadeva: Komunikacijska strategija v zvezi s Pogodbo o Ustavi za Evropo
Subject: Communication strategy concerning the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
Kaj namerava Evropska komisija storiti v okviru splošne komunikacijske strategije za pozitivni izid ratifikacijskih postopkov Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo?
What action does the European Commission intend to take as part of a common communication strategy aiming at a positive outcome of the ratification procedures for the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0037/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0037/04
, v imenu skupine GUE/NGL
, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group
Zadeva: Liberalizacija tekstilne industrije v okviru pogajanj STO
Subject: Liberalisation of the textile sector in the WTO negotiations
V Evropski uniji obsega tekstilna in oblačilna industrija več kot 177 tisoč podjetij.
The textile and clothing sector accounts for over 177 000 undertakings in the EU.
Po širitvi bo zaposlovala 2,7 milijona ljudi, od katerih veliko žensk, predvsem v zapostavljenih regijah.
With enlargement it will employ some 2.7 m persons, a large proportion of them women, especially in less-favoured regions.
Zaradi vse večje liberalizacije je bilo med leti 1990 in 2001 v tem sektorju izgubljenih 850 tisoč delovnih mest in na tisoče podjetij je šlo v stečaj.
The sector is being hit by the effects of increasing liberalisation at world level, and between 1990 and 2001 lost approximately 850 000 jobs and thousands of enterprises.
Pričakuje se, da se bodo konkurenčni pritiski še stopnjevali, saj se je s 1. januarjem 2005 sektor prisiljen prilagoditi dokončni ukinitvi uvoznih kontingentov in pristopu Kitajske k STO.
The competitive pressure is expected to become more intense as the sector is forced to adapt to the permanent removal of import quotas on 1 January 2005 and to China's entry into the WTO.
V zvezi s tem je 60 tekstilnih združenj iz 36-ih držav, vključno s Portugalsko zvezo tekstilne in oblačilne industrije, podpisalo tako imenovano 'Istanbulsko deklaracijo', v kateri zahtevajo, da se zadnja faza tekstilnega in oblačilnega sporazuma ne izvaja do 31. decembra 2007.
In this connection, 60 associations of textile producers from 36 countries, among them the Portuguese Textile and Clothing Industry Federation, have signed the 'Istanbul Declaration', in which they call for the final phase of the textile and clothing agreement not to be implemented until 31 December 2007.
Ali lahko Svet poda:
Can the Council state:
svoje mnenje o 'Istanbulski deklaraciji' in zavlačevanje zadnje faze tekstilnega in oblačilnega sporazuma, in ali je mnenja, da bi se po podpisu te deklaracije moral preveriti njen pogajalski mandat;
its opinion concerning the 'Istanbul declaration' and delaying the final phase of the textile and clothing agreement, and whether it believes its negotiating mandate needs to be revised following the signing of that declaration;
svoje stališče glede predloga Evropskega parlamenta in načrtovane ukrepe za zagotovitev njegove izvedbe najkasneje do leta 2005 v okviru razprave o finančnem načrtu za obdobje 2007-2013;
its view on the proposal of Parliament and the action it intends to take in order to ensure its implementation, no later than 2005 and in the context of the debate on the financial perspective for 2007-2013;
pregled ukrepov, ki so predvideni s predlogi za tekstilno in oblačilno industrijo v okviru finančnega načrta za obdobje 2007-2013?
what measures are envisaged for the textile and clothing sector in the proposals submitted in the context of the financial perspective for 2007-2013?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0038/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0038/04
Ali lahko Komisija poda:
Can the Commission state:
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0039/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0039/04
Zadeva: Prepoved vstopa na Portugalsko ladji organizacije "Women on Waves"
Subject: Ban on entry into Portugal of 'Women on Waves' ship
Konec avgusta 2004, ko se na Portugalskem še vedno sodno preganja ženske, ki morajo narediti splav, je portugalska vlada nizozemski ladji v lasti organizacije "Women on Waves" prepovedala vstop v portugalske vode oziroma pristanek v portugalskih pristaniščih in s tem jasno kršila pravico do obveščanja in izražanja.
At the end of August 2004, at a time when the legal persecution of women who are obliged to seek abortions is continuing in Portugal, the Portuguese government, in a clear breach of the right to information and expression, banned a Dutch ship belonging to the organisation 'Women on Waves' from entering Portuguese waters or docking at a Portuguese port, thus impeding the holding of the debates and information sessions on sexual and reproductive rights scheduled with Portuguese and European parliamentarians and organisations.
S tem dejanjem je ogrozila izvedbo načrtovanih razprav in informativnih dogodkov s portugalskimi in evropskimi parlamentarci ter organizacijami na temo pravic na področju spolnosti in razmnoževanja.
Under existing Portuguese law there are no restrictions on organisations' right to promote actions which they believe are pro-women and are aimed at changing Portugal's present repressive legislation.
Dejstvo, da RU-486 ("jutranja tabletka") ni v prodaji na Portugalskem (kar je jasen primer zaostalosti na področju javnega zdravja), portugalskim ženskam ne sme omejevati možnosti, da so obveščene o tem, da tabletko odobrava Evropska agencija za zdravila oziroma da je to varna metoda brez operacije, ki jo imajo ženske na voljo do sedmega tedna nosečnosti v večini držav članic EU, vključno s Španijo, Francijo in Veliko Britanijo.
The fact that the RU-486 ('morning-after') pill is not marketed in Portugal (representing a clear case of backwardness in the public health field) does not prevent Portuguese women from being aware that it is authorised by the European Medicines Agency or that it offers a non-surgical and safe method which is available to women up to the seventh week of pregnancy in most EU Member States, including Spain, France and the UK.
Poleg tega je Parlament v resoluciji z dne 3. julija 2002 pozval države članice, naj opustijo represivne načine delovanja in naj spodbujajo kampanje za informiranje o pravicah na področju spolnosti in razmnoževanja.
In addition, Parliament, in its resolution of 3 July 2002 , called on the Member States to end repressive practices and to promote information campaigns on sexual and reproductive rights.
Lahko Komisija predstavi svoje mnenje o tem položaju?
Can the Commission state its view on this situation?
Bo opomnila portugalsko vlado, naj spremeni svoj odnos, ki je v nasprotju s pravico do izražanja in obveščanja, in odpravi svojo prepoved vstopa na Portugalsko nizozemski ladji v lasti organizacije "Women on Waves"?
Will it urge the Portuguese government to change its attitude, which is in breach of the right to freedom of expression and information, and lift its ban on the entry into Portugal of the Dutch ship belonging to the organisation 'Women on Waves'?
UL C 271 E, 12.11.2003, str.
OJ C 271 E, 12.11.2003, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0040/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0040/04
, v imenu Odbora za razvoj ,
, on behalf of the Committee on Development ,
, v imenu Odbora za mednarodno trgovino
, on behalf of the Committee on International Trade
Zadeva: Sporočilo Komisije: "Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: funkcija splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) za desetletno obdobje od 2006 do 2015"
Subject: Communication from the Commission: 'developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community's Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015'
Sporočilo Komisije ( KOM(2004)0461 /končno) določa desetletne smernice za splošni sistem preferencialov, ki je eden od ključnih instrumentov za podporo državam v razvoju pri zmanjševanju revščine, tako da jim pomaga ustvarjati prihodke z mednarodno trgovino.
The Commission's Communication ( COM(2004)0461 /final) sets out ten-year guidelines for the Generalised System of Preferences, one of the key instruments for assisting developing countries to reduce poverty by helping them generate revenue through international trade.
Tem splošnim smernicam sledila serija triletnih uredb.
On the basis of these broad guidelines, a series of three-year regulations will subsequently ensue.
Cilji, ki so določeni v sporočilu, se načeloma nanašajo na zahteve, ki so jih predhodno zastavile države partnerice, nevladna telesa in institucije EU, vključno z Evropskim parlamentom.
The objectives stated in the Communication correspond in principle to the demands previously put forward by partner countries, non-state actors and EU institutions, including the European Parliament.
Vendar pa Evropski parlament za dokončno ocenjevanje na osnovi zanesljivih informacij potrebuje nadaljnja pojasnila o podrobnostih in mehanizmih izvajanja.
However, before the European Parliament can provide a more informed and definitive assessment, further clarification is required as to the exact details and mechanisms of implementation.
Kakšna je predhodna ocena Sveta o spremembah, ki jih predlaga sporočilo?
What is the Council's preliminary assessment of the changes proposed by the Communication?
Bolj podrobno, kaj meni Svet o novem sistemu "GSP+"?
In particular, what are the views of the Council regarding the new ‘GSP+’ arrangement?
Katera mednarodna konvencija naj bi po mnenju Sveta bila zavezujoča za upravičence "GSP+"?
Which international conventions should, according to the Council, be mandatory for ‘GSP+’ entitlement?
Ali Svet meni, da naj bi izvajanje ustreznih konvencij bil pogoj za dostop do "GSP+" ali bi bila dovolj že ratifikacija?
Does the Council consider that implementation of relevant conventions should be a requirement to gain access to ‘GSP+’ or should ratification be sufficient?
Kaj meni Svet o novem mehanizmu razvrščanja, ki ga predlaga Komisija?
What is the position of the Council on the new graduation mechanism proposed by the Commission?
Ali se Svet v luči odprave preferencialov, ki so posledica nenehnih zniževanj tarif, strinja, da naj nov sistem GSP razširi veljavnost preferencialov na nove izdelke, precejšnje število izdelkov, trenutno opredeljenih s kategorijo "občutljivo", pa prekvalificira v kategorijo "normalno"?
Does the Council agree that, in view of the erosion of preferences as a result of continuous tariff reductions, the new GSP system should extend preferential access to a wide range of new products and transfer a significant number of products currently classified as ‘sensitive’ to the ‘non-sensitive’ category?
Kaj meni Svet o možnosti razširitve preferencialnega razpona za občutljive izdelke?
What is the position of the Council regarding a possible increase in the preferential margin for sensitive products?
Kakšno je stališče Sveta do spremembe sistema pravil o poreklu?
What are the views of the Council on the reform of the system of rules of origin?
Kakšno je stališče Sveta o predlagani "klavzuli o izvzetju PTS (prostotrgovinskih sporazumov)"?
What is the position of the Council regarding the proposed ‘FTA-exclusion clause’?
Končne podrobnosti, ki bodo pokazale natančno delovanje novega GSP, bodo znane šele, ko bo izdana naslednja uredba.
The final details, showing exactly how the new GSP system will function, will only be known when the proposal for the next regulation is released.
Vsaka sprememba v sedanjem sistemu GSP bo neposredno, v nekaterih primerih tudi negativno, vplivala na veliko število zainteresiranih strank.
Any change in the current GSP system will directly affect, and in some cases adversely impact, a wide variety of stakeholders.
Ali se Svet s tem v zvezi in v želji po zagotovitvi primerne ravni preglednosti in demokratičnega nadzora strinja, da je Evropskemu parlamentu in ostalim zainteresiranim pred sprejetjem končne uredbe potrebno dati dovolj časa za pomembno posvetovanje?
In this context, and with a view to assuring a reasonable level of transparency and democratic scrutiny, does the Council agree that enough time should be given to the European Parliament and other relevant stakeholders for a meaningful consultation before the adoption of the final Regulation?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0041/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0041/04
Zadeva: Sporočilo Komisije: "Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: funkcija splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) za desetletno obdobje od 2006 do 2015"
Subject: Communication from the Commission: 'Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community's Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015'
Sporočilo Komisije ( KOM(2004)0461 /končno) določa desetletne smernice za splošni sistem preferencialov, ki je eden od ključnih instrumentov za podporo državam v razvoju pri zmanjševanju revščine, tako da jim pomaga ustvarjati prihodke z mednarodno trgovino.
The Commission's Communication ( COM(2004)0461 /final) sets out ten-year guidelines for the Generalised System of Preferences, one of the key instruments for assisting developing countries to reduce poverty by helping them to generate revenue through international trade.
Komisija v sporočilu predlaga, da se sedanji splošni sistem preferencialov izboljša z zmanjšanjem števila določb in s poenostavitvijo le-teh, z osredotočanjem preferencialov na tiste države v razvoju, ki jih najbolj potrebujejo, in z dodatno podporo trajnostnemu razvoju z oblikovanjem enotnega sistema dodatnih koncesij (GSP+).
The Commission’s Communication proposes to improve the current Generalised System of Preferences through the reduction and simplification of the arrangements, the concentration of preferences on those developing countries most in need and the promotion of sustainable development through the creation of a single system of additional concessions (GSP+).
Ti cilji se načeloma nanašajo na zahteve, ki so jih predhodno zastavile države partnerice, nevladna telesa in institucije EU, vključno z Evropskim parlamentom.
These objectives correspond in principle to the demands previously put forward by partner countries, non-state actors and EU institutions, including the European Parliament.
Vendar pa Evropski parlament za dokončno oceno na osnovi zanesljivih informacij potrebuje nadaljnja pojasnila o podrobnostih in mehanizmih izvajanja.
However, before the European Parliament can provide a more informed and definitive assessment, further clarification is required as to the exact details and mechanisms of implementation.
Ali Komisija torej lahko Parlamentu posreduje podrobnejše informacije v zvezi z naslednjimi vprašanji:
In particular, can the Commission provide Parliament with more detailed information on the following questions:
Ali predlagane spremembe temeljijo na predhodni oceni delovanja in vplivov sedanjega sistema GSP?
Are the changes proposed based on a prior evaluation of the functioning and impact of the current GSP system?
Natančno kako bo deloval novi mehanizem razvrščanja in za katere države bo uporaben?
How exactly will the new graduation mechanism function and to which countries will it be applicable?
Kateri novi izdelki bodo vključeni v vsako izmed kategorij izdelkov?
What new products will be incorporated into each of the product categories?
Katere konvencije bodo zavezujoče za uporabo določb "GSP+"?
Which conventions will be mandatory for the application of ‘GSP+’ arrangements?
Ali bo izvajanje ustreznih konvencij pogoj za sodelovanje v "GSP+" ali bo dovolj že ratifikacija?
Will implementation of relevant conventions be a requirement for access to ‘GSP+’ or will ratification be sufficient?
Natančno kako namerava Komisija spremeniti sistem pravil o poreklu?
How exactly is the Commission planning to reform the system of rules of origin?
Kako se bo izvedla "klavzula o izvzetju PTS (prostotrgovinskih sporazumov)" glede na zapletenost sprememb obstoječih PTS?
How will the ‘FTA-exclusion clause’ be implemented, given the complexity of the reform of current FTAs?
Ali se Komisija s tem v zvezi in v želji po zagotovitvi primerne ravni preglednosti in demokratičnega nadzora strinja, da je Evropskemu parlamentu in ostalim zainteresiranim pred sprejetjem končne uredbe potrebno dati dovolj časa za pomembno posvetovanje?
In this context, and with a view to assuring a reasonable level of transparency and democratic scrutiny, does the Commission agree that enough time should be given to the European Parliament and other relevant stakeholders for a meaningful consultation before the adoption of the final Regulation?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0042/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0042/04
, v imenu skupine PSE ,
, on behalf of the PSE Group,
, v imenu skupine Verts/ALE ,
, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group,
, v imenu skupine ALDE
, on behalf of the ALDE Group
Zadeva: Prepoved portugalske vlade vstopu nizozemske ladje združenja "Women on Waves"
Subject: Banning by the Portuguese Government of the Dutch boat belonging to the association 'Women on Waves'
Portugalska vlada je brez utemeljenega razloga nizozemski ladji združenja "Women on Waves" prepovedala vstop v teritorialne vode Portugalske.
The Portuguese Government has banned the Dutch ship belonging to the association 'Women on Waves' from entering Portuguese territorial waters, without giving any valid reason for this.
Ladja se je napotila na Portugalsko na povabilo portugalskih združenj v okviru informacijske kampanje in ozaveščanja o reproduktivnem in spolnem zdravju.
The vessel was sailing to Portugal at the invitation of Portuguese associations as part of an information campaign aimed at raising awareness with regard to reproductive and sexual health.
Ali Komisija ocenjuje, da ta prepoved predstavlja kršenje prava Skupnosti in mednarodnega prava ter Konvencije ZN o mednarodnem pomorskem pravu?
Does the Commission consider this ban to constitute a violation of Community and international law and of the Convention on the Law of the Sea?
Ali Komisija ocenjuje, da je bila kršena pravica do prostega gibanja?
Does it consider that the right to freedom of movement has been violated?
Kakšen ukrep namerava Komisija sprejeti, da vzpostavi zakonitost, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je Komisija nadzornica izvajanja Pogodb?
What will it do to restore legality, in view of the fact that it is the guardian of the Treaties?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0043/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0043/04
, v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Zadeva: Strateški cilji EU za 13. srečanje Konvencije CITES
Subject: EU strategic objectives for the 13th Meeting of the CITES Convention
Kateri so ključni strateški cilji za Evropsko unijo na bližnji konferenci pogodbenic Konvencije o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi divjimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami (CITES), ki bo potekala v Bangkoku, na Tajskem, od 2. do 14. oktobra 2004?
What are the key strategic objectives for the European Union at the forthcoming Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) that will be held in Bangkok, Thailand from 2-14 October 2004?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0044/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0044/04
Zadeva: Vpliv visoko zmogljivih aktivnih pomorskih sonarjev na okolje
Subject: Environmental effects of high-intensity active naval sonars
575-576), da so visoko zmogljivi aktivni pomorski sonarji za kite, delfine in ribe lahko smrtonosni?
575-576) that high-intensity active naval sonars can be lethal to whales, dolphins and fish?
Kakšen je odgovor Sveta osemnajstim evropskim znanstvenikom, soavtorjem članka v reviji Nature, ki so izjavili, da se "morajo naše ugotovitve upoštevati pri regulaciji in omejevanju škodljivih vplivov antropogenih sonarjev na kite"?
What is the Council's response to the 18 European scientists who co-authored the Nature article, and stated that ‘our findings need to be taken into account in considering the regulation and limitation of the adverse impact of anthropogenic sonar on cetaceans’?
Kako bo Svet v skladu z načelom previdnosti zagotovil, da nova dognanja vojaške tehnologije ne bodo imela negativnih posledic na okolje?
How will the Council, in line with the precautionary principle, make sure that new developments in military technologies do not have negative effects on the environment?
UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0045/04
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0045/04