natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali države Evropske unije s tem, ko so se glasovanja vzdržale, sprejemajo in na tihem podpirajo glorifikacijo in rehabilitacijo sodelavcev nacističnih vojnih zločincev, ki jim je v velikem številu držav članic Evropske unije dana prosta pot, medtem ko se krepi pregon veteranov, ki so se borili proti fašizmu, ter komunistov in komunističnih strank?
Is the abstention of the EU Member States indicative of tolerance or tacit support for the glorification and rehabilitation of those who collaborated in Nazi war crimes, which is taking place openly in a number of EU Member States, while at the same time action is being stepped up against veterans of the resistance against fascism and against communists and communist parties?
Ali sodi odločitev Evropske unije, da manifestacij, s katerimi se želi izkriviti in na veliko ponarediti zgodovino, ne obsodi, med nezaslišana prizadevanja, da bi nacizem in komunizem postavili na isto raven?
Is the refusal of the EU to condemn manifestations inspired by the distortion and falsification of history linked with the unprecedented efforts being made to place Nazism and communism on the same footing?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000005/2011
Question for Question Time H-000005/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Nečloveško ravnanje z migranti v Grčiji
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Inhuman treatment of immigrants in Greece
31. decembra 2010 je minister za zaščito državljanov izjavil, da vlada stranke PASOK ob sodelovanju Frontexa načrtuje gradnjo 12,5 km dolge pregrade vzdolž meje v prefekturi Evros, ki naj bi odvračala nezakonite priseljence, pa tudi, da bodo iz Grčije s prostovoljno vrnitvijo ali s prisilo izgnani vsi migranti, razen tistih, ki lahko zahtevajo mednarodno zaščito ali pravico do azila, skratka vsi migranti brez izjeme.
In a statement on 31 December 2010, the Citizens’ Protection Minister warned that, in cooperation with Frontex, the PASOK government was planning to put up a 12.5 km fence along the borders in the Evro prefecture, as a barrier to illegal immigrants, and that it would expel all immigrants from Greece, either by voluntary repatriation or by forced expulsion, apart from those who were entitled to international protection or who had right of asylum, in other words all of them.
Zdajšnja vlada stranke PASOK in prejšnja vlada stranke Nova demokracija sta Grčijo spremenili v pekel za ekonomske migrante in begunce.
Successive PASOK and New Democracy governments have turned Greece into a hell for economic migrants and refugees.
V sporočilu z dne 13. decembra 2010 je visoki komisariat Združenih narodov za begunce v Atenah izrazil globoko skrb zaradi humanitarnih razmer vseh oseb, ki so vstopile na grško ozemlje in so pridržane v izjemno težkih razmerah, vključno z otroki brez spremstva ter drugimi ranljivimi osebami, pa tudi zaradi le pičlih možnosti, ki jih imajo te osebe, da bi bile njihove prošnje za status begunca ugodno rešene.
The UN High Commission for refugees in Athens, in a statement issued on 13 December 2010, expressed strong concern about the humanitarian situation of those who reached Greece, who were held in particularly difficult conditions, including unaccompanied children and other vulnerable people, and had little chance of their application for refugee status being examined correctly.
Ali Komisija podpira politiko vlade stranke PASOK, ki namerava "zgraditi pregrado" vzdolž državnih meja in podpira "nično toleranco" ter prostovoljni ali prisilni izgon vseh migrantov in beguncev?
Does the Commission agree with the PASOK government’s policy of erecting a fence along the country’s borders, exercising ‘zero tolerance’ and carrying out voluntary or forced expulsion of all immigrants and refugees?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000006/2011
Question for Question Time H-000006/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Nove provokacije Izraela proti palestinskemu ljudstvu
(GUE/NGL) Subject: New provocative action by Israel against the Palestinian people
Izraelska kopenska vojska in letalstvo sta v zadnjih dneh v Gazi izvedla pravi val morilskih napadov, zaradi katerih se iz dneva v dan veča število mrtvih in ranjenih med palestinskim civilnim prebivalstvom, ki že trpi zaradi okupacije in gospodarske osamitve, vsiljenih s strani Izraela, ki celo ribičem onemogoča izhod na morje.
Israel’s army and air force have recently escalated their murderous attacks in the Gaza strip, increasing the number of dead and wounded among the Palestinian civilian population, which is suffering from the occupation and from the economic blockade imposed by Israel which even prevents fishermen from putting to sea.
Bombardiranje znotraj Gaze, ki je namenjeno ustrahovanju palestinskega ljudstva, se je neprestano odvijalo tudi med božičnimi in novoletnimi prazniki, zlasti na področju zelene črte in zidu, ki ga je zgradil Izrael.
The efforts to terrorise the Palestinian people continued unabated throughout the Christmas and New Year period, mainly around the area of the green line and the wall that Israel has built, and there were also bombing raids inside Gaza.
Hkrati je treba opozoriti na nezakonito pridržanje tisočerih političnih ujetnikov, med katerimi so tudi ženske in otroci, ki so že vrsto let zaprti v izraelskih ječah v nemogočih razmerah.
At the same time, we condemn the illegal imprisonment of thousands of political prisoners, including women and children, who have been held for many years in unacceptable conditions in Israeli prisons.
Ali namerava Svet obsoditi te nove izraelske provokacije, usmerjene proti palestinskemu ljudstvu, in priznati obstoj suverene in neodvisne enotne palestinske države na ozemlju, ki je od leta 1967 pod okupacijo in katere prestolnica je vzhodni Jeruzalem?
Does the Council intend to condemn this new provocation by Israel against the Palestinian people and to recognise the existence of an independent, unified and sovereign Palestinian state in the territories occupied since 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital?
Ali namerava zahtevati takojšnjo izpustitev palestinskih političnih zapornikov, zaprtih v izraelskih ječah?
Does it intend to call for the immediate release of Palestinian political prisoners from Israeli prisons?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000007/2011
Question for Question Time H-000007/2011
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Protest proti ponarejanju zgodovinske resnice
(GUE/NGL) Subject: No to the falsification of history
Decembra 2010 so zunanji ministri Bolgarije, Češke, Latvije, Litve, Romunije in Madžarske, ki od 1. januarja 2011 predseduje Svetu, pisno zahtevali od Komisije, naj v celotni Evropski uniji kazensko preganja vsakogar, ki ne priznava domnevnih zločinov komunizma v „totalitarnih državah“ vzhodne Evrope.
In December 2010, the foreign ministers of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Hungary – which assumed the Council Presidency on 1 January 2011 – forwarded a letter to the Commission seeking criminal proceedings throughout the EU against those who refuse to acknowledge alleged Communist 'crimes' in the 'totalitarian states' of Eastern Europe.
Gre je nevaren poskus posploševanja kazenskega pregona in ukrepov, ki se v teh šestih držav uporabljajo proti komunistom in komunističnim strankam, pa tudi proti posameznikom, ki se zoperstavijo nesprejemljivemu poistovetenju komunizma s fašizmom.
This is a dangerous attempt to generalise the criminal proceedings and action being taken in these six countries against Communists and Communist parties and those who refuse to accept the inadmissible attempt to place Communism and Fascism on the same footing.
Ni naključje, da do tega prihaja v času kapitalistične gospodarske krize in v trenutku, ko se krepi boj delavskega razreda in ljudskih množic.
It is no coincidence that this action is being taken at a time when the capitalist system is facing an economic crisis and action to defend working class and grassroots interests is being stepped up.
Ali se Komisija strinja z načeli, mnenji in predlogi iz pisma šestih ministrov?
Does the Commission concur with the ideas, motives and recommendations contained in the letter from the six foreign ministers?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000008/2011
Question for Question Time H-000008/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Problematika odškodnine ob okoljski škodi
(PPE) Subject: Problem of compensation for environmental damage
Madžarsko, ki je pred kratkim prevzela predsedovanje Svetu, je lani prizadela huda ekološka katastrofa – poplava rdečega blata.
Last year Hungary, which has recently taken over the Presidency of the Council, was hit by a major environmental disaster, the red sludge flood.
Po navedbah je bil eden glavnih vzrokov za katastrofo nestrokovno vzdrževanje obrata.
One of the main causes of the disaster was said to be poor maintenance of the facility concerned.
EU ne predvideva finančne pomoči državam v primeru katastrof, do katerih je prišlo zaradi namernega oz. malomarnega človeškega ravnanja.
The EU does not provide financial assistance to Member States in the event of disasters caused by deliberate human agency or by negligence.
Če so povzročitelji finančno šibki, tudi države članice pogosto ne zmorejo same nositi finančnih posledic takšnih nesreč.
If those responsible are short of funds, Member States themselves are often unable to bear the financial consequences of such an accident unassisted.
Ali se predsedstvo ne strinja s tem, da bi bilo treba preveriti in zaostriti zakonske predpise glede projektiranja (predvsem v zvezi s preverjanjem ekološke sprejemljivosti), vzdrževanja in delovanja obratov, pri katerih obstaja visoko okoljsko tveganje?
Does not the Presidency consider that the legal provisions on the planning (particularly in connection with environmental impact assessments), maintenance and operation of installations which pose serious environmental risks should be reviewed and made more stringent?
Ali ne bi bilo prav tako smotrno, če bi se v Evropski uniji ustanovil sklad, ki bi se financiral s prispevki tistih, ki izvajajo nadzor nad obrati z visokim okoljskim tveganjem, z na ta način pridobljenimi sredstvi pa bi se pozneje izplačevale odškodnine v primeru ekoloških katastrof, povzročenih zaradi takšnih obratov (podobno kot sklad, ki ga je prostovoljno ustanovila družba „British Petroleum“ za izplačilo odškodnin za posledice katastrofe v Mehiškem zalivu)?
Would it not be desirable to establish a fund in the European Union financed by means of contributions from those with control over installations which pose serious environmental risks, on which it would subsequently be possible to draw to provide compensation for damage caused by environmental disasters attributable to such facilities (similar to the fund voluntarily established by British Petroleum to pay compensation for the consequences of the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico)?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000009/2011
Question for Question Time H-000009/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Dosežki učencev v državah članicah Evropske unije
(PPE) Subject: Performance of pupils in EU Member States
Rezultati mednarodne primerjave dosežkov 15-letnih dijakov (raziskava PISA 2009), ki jih je pred kratkim objavila organizacija OECD, na splošno kažejo, da je konkurenčnost EU resno ogrožena, saj sta na področju bralnih kompetenc (raven 5-6) med najboljšimi desetimi samo dve državi EU.
On the whole, the recently published results of the international survey of the performance of 15-year-old school pupils (PISA Survey 2009) show that the EU’s competitiveness is seriously threatened, because in the field of reading competence (Levels 5-6) only two EU countries are ranked in the top 10.
Na področju matematike sta med najboljšimi desetimi samo 3 države EU, nobene pa ni med najboljšimi petimi.
In the field of mathematics, only three EU countries figure in the top 10, and none are in the top five.
Glede na to, da bodo leta 2020 ti mladi in njihovi mlajši sošolci dejavni na trgu dela oziroma se bodo pripravljali na vstop na ta trg, je v državah članicah nujno treba sprejeti učinkovite ukrepe, če želimo bistveno izboljšati kakovost izobraževanja učencev.
In 2020 both these young people and their younger fellow pupils will either be active on the labour market or be in the process of entering it, and it is therefore necessary to take immediate effective measures in the Member States if we wish to significantly improve the quality of pupils' education.
Ali namerava Komisija podrobno oceniti omenjeno raziskavo in državam članicam predložiti konkretne predloge primerov dobre prakse?
Will the Commission make a thorough assessment of the above survey and submit specific recommendations to the Member States for procedures of proven effectiveness?
Ali je v načrtu izdelava programa za razširjanje take dobre prakse ali oblikovanje foruma, v katerem se bo razpravljalo o nastalih izzivih?
Are there plans for compiling a programme to disseminate such tried and tested procedures or to establish a forum to debate the challenges which need to be faced?
Ali bi se bilo treba z državami članicami pogovoriti o tem, kakšne ukrepe naj sprejmejo za izboljšanje rezultatov?
Should discussions be held with the Member States to determine what measures need to be taken in order to improve their results?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000010/2011
Question for Question Time H-000010/2011
Delno zasedanje: februar 2011
Part-session: February 2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Pravna država v Srbiji
(PPE) Subject: Rule of law in Serbia
Kako Svet ocenjuje razvoj spoštovanja načela pravne države v Srbiji, zlasti v zvezi z dvomljivimi sodnimi procesi proti domnevnim paravojaškim enotam, ki pripadajo albanski manjšini v Preševski dolini v južni Srbiji?
How does the Council view the development of the rule of law in Serbia, particularly in the light of the questionable court case against alleged guerrillas belonging to the Albanian minority in the Preševo valley in southern Serbia?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000011/2011
Question for Question Time H-000011/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Razvoj dogodkov v Zahodni Afriki
(PPE) Subject: Developments in West Africa
Kako Komisija ocenjuje razvoj gospodarskih odnosov, čezmejne infrastrukture ter demokracije in pravne države v Zahodni Afriki, zlasti ob upoštevanju težav v Kamerunu in na Slonokoščeni obali?
How does the Commission view the development of economic conditions, cross-border infrastructure and democracy and the rule of law in West Africa, particularly in the light of the problems in Cameroon and Ivory Coast?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000012/2011
Question for Question Time H-000012/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Mala in srednja podjetja ter madžarsko predsedstvo
(PPE) Subject: SMEs and the Hungarian Presidency
Eden od opredeljenih ciljev madžarskega predsedstva Svetu je želja izboljšati položaj malih in srednjih podjetij.
One of the stated aims of the Hungarian Presidency of the Council is to improve the situation of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Ali lahko Svet to podrobneje razloži in poda praktične podrobnosti o tem, kako namerava izboljšati stvari za mala in srednja podjetja, ki se borijo za preživetje?
Could the Council elaborate a little on this point and give practical details as to how it will improve things for SMEs which are struggling to survive?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000013/2011
Question for Question Time H-000013/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Oznaka CE
(PPE) Subject: The CE mark
Ali lahko Komisija opiše, kakšen napredek je bil dosežen pri krepitvi oznake CE, da bi spodbudili evropski izvoz na trge, kot so Južna Amerika in Azija, saj je bila to ena od zavez komisarja Tajanija ob njegovem imenovanju?
Could the Commission outline what progress has been made on strengthening the CE mark in order to promote European exports in markets like South America and Asia, as this was one of the commitments that Commissioner Tajani made upon being appointed to office?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000014/2011
Question for Question Time H-000014/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Pobude na področju upravljanja vode in pitne vode
(PPE) Subject: Initiatives on the management of water and drinking water
Madžarsko predsedstvo je v informacijskem dokumentu, v katerem je predstavilo svoje prednostne naloge, navedlo, da želi posebno pozornost nameniti upravljanju vode in pitne vode ter ekstremnim vremenskim pojavom, povezanim z vodnimi viri.
In its publicity material setting out its priorities, the Hungarian Presidency has expressed the desire to give special attention to issues of water and drinking water management, as well as extreme events related to water resources.
Ker v programu ni natančno navedeno, katere politike se bodo izvajale v ta namen, ali predsedstvo lahko obvesti Parlament, katere konkretne pobude namerava na tem področju izvajati?
Since the programme does not specify which policies it will follow in this connection, would the Presidency inform the EP precisely which steps it intends to take in this area?
Ali meni, da se bodo države članice Evropske unije v prihodnjih letih soočale s konkretnimi problemi v zvezi z upravljanjem in zanesljivostjo vodnih virov?
Does it consider that over the next few years a specific problem will arise as regards the management and security of supply of water resources and drinking water in European Member States?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000015/2011
Question for Question Time H-000015/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Neenotnost podjetniškega okolja v državah članicah
(PPE) Subject: Uneven environment for growth and development in Member States
Med pomembnimi prednostnimi nalogami strategije Evropa 2020 je podpora podjetniškemu duhu s pomočjo izvajanja razvojne politike ter izboljšanja podjetniškega ozračja, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja.
One of the key priorities of 'Europe 2020' Strategy is to support entrepreneurship through policies aimed at promoting growth and improving the business climate, in particular for SMEs.
Vendar v zvezi s podjetniškim okoljem opažamo velike razlike med državami članicami, saj v mnogih breme birokratskih zahtev ter visoki stroški pri ustanavljanju novih podjetij zavirajo podjetniški duh.
Nevertheless, among Member States there is a very uneven business environment since, in many of them, setting up a new business involves a lot of red tape and high costs: this discourages entrepreneurship.
Poleg tega gospodarska kriza še povečuje problem ter oblikuje podjetniški zemljevid EU, na katerem je vidna neenotnost ter posledično neusklajen razvoj znotraj meja EU.
Moreover, the economic crisis has exacerbated the problem and is creating a map of the EU characterised by disparities as regards entrepreneurship and thus growth.
Ali Komisija lahko odgovori na naslednji vprašanji: Ali meni, da je cilj o razvoju podjetij iz strategije Evropa 2020 realističen in ga bo mogoče doseči (glede na ugotovljene razlike) v vseh državah članicah v naslednjih desetih letih?
Does the Commission consider that the objective of business growth set out in the 'Europe 2020' Strategy is realistic and can be achieved within the next decade in all Member States, given the existence of these disparities?
Ali namerava državam članicam priporočiti izvajanje konkretne politike in skupnega okvira za premagovanje težav, ki zavirajo podjetniški duh?
Will it recommend that Member States adopt specific policies and a common framework for addressing the problems which deter entrepreneurship?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000016/2011
Question for Question Time H-000016/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Udeležba invalidov in njihovih predstavniških organizacij pri sprejemanju odločitev v zvezi z invalidi
(S&D) Subject: Participation by disabled persons and their representative organisations in decision-making affecting disabled persons
Evropska strategija 2010–2020 za invalide, ki jo je objavila Evropska komisija, bo vplivala na približno 80 milijonov invalidov v Evropski uniji.
The European Disability Strategy 2010-2020, published by the Commission, will affect the lives of 80 million disabled people in the EU.
Komisija je opredelila osem ključnih področij ukrepanja: dostop, udeležba, enakost, zaposlovanje, izobraževanje in usposabljanje, socialno varstvo, zdravje in zunanje ukrepanje.
The Commission has identified eight key areas: accessibility, participation, equality, work and training, social protection, health and external action.
Institucije EU in držav članic so pozvane k skupnemu izvajanju te strategije.
The EU institutions and Member States are to implement this strategy together.
V skladu s Konvencijo Združenih narodov v zvezi s pravicami invalidov se morajo države članice, ki sprejemajo odločitve v zvezi z invalidi, tesno posvetovati z invalidi in zagotoviti njihovo udeležbo v tem postopku, kakor tudi udeležbo njihovih predstavniških organizacij.
In accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Member States which adopt decisions affecting disabled persons are required to closely consult with and actively involve persons with disabilities, through their representative organisations.
Žal ta določba ni predvidena v novi strategiji o invalidih.
Unfortunately, there is no provision for such consultation in the new disability strategy.
Ali je Svet sprejel konkretne ukrepe, da bi zagotovil spoštovanje načela Konvencije Združenih narodov v zvezi s pravicami invalidov 'nobena odločitev o invalidih brez invalidov'?
Has the Council taken any specific measures to ensure that the principle of 'no action on disability without the disabled' enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is observed?
Poleg tega, kakšno je stališče Sveta glede ustanovitve odbora za invalidnost (Disability committee), ki bi bil odgovoren Svetu "Zaposlovanje, socialna politika, zdravje in potrošniki" (EPSCO) in bi ga vodila država, ki predseduje Evropski uniji?
Furthermore, how does the Council view the proposal to establish a disability committee, answerable to the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (EPSCO) and chaired by the country holding the Presidency of the European Union?
Ali se Svet strinja, da bi tako Komisija in države članice bile bolje vključene v izvajanje Konvencije Združenih narodov v zvezi s pravicami invalidov?
Does the Council agree that this would make for closer involvement by the Commission and Member States in the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000017/2011
Question for Question Time H-000017/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Evropsko leto prostovoljstva
(S&D) Subject: European Year of Volunteering
Ali lahko Svet navede, kakšne dejavnosti in ukrepe načrtuje madžarsko predsedstvo za spodbujanje evropskega leta prostovoljstva v prvi polovici leta 2011?
Can the Council state what steps the Hungarian Presidency of the EU Council intends to take to promote the European Year of Volunteering in the first half of 2011?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000018/2011
Question for Question Time H-000018/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Zavarovalne storitve in storitve za pomoč potnikom
(S&D) Subject: Insurance and assistance services for tourists
Nekatere potovalne agencije ponujajo svojim strankam poleg potovanja zavarovanje, ki krije odpoved potovanja, zdravstveno pomoč v primeru bolezni ali nezgode in vrnitev v domovino v primeru smrti.
Alongside tour packages, some tour companies offer insurance in the event of the cancellation of a trip, medical assistance in the event of accident or illness and repatriation in the event of death.
Takšno zavarovanje velja za obdobje trajanja počitnic ali 90 dni ali celotno leto.
Those services are provided for the duration of the holiday, for 90 days or for one year.
Turisti cenijo to storitev, saj se počutijo varnejši pred počitnicami in med njimi.
They are popular with tourists, who feel better protected before and during the holiday.
Vendar nekatere agencije povezujejo pomoč pri vrnitvi v domovino v primeru bolezni ali nezgode z nakupom letalske vozovnice in določajo ceno tega zavarovanja glede na vrednost vozovnice.
Certain tour companies, however, base their offer of repatriation assistance in the event of accident or illness solely on the airline ticket, and base the price of the assistance on the value of that ticket.