natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Graham Watson iz liberalne skupine je izjavil, da „so največji izziv razvoj tretjega sveta, podnebne spremembe in boj proti mednarodnemu kriminalu“.
Graham Watson for the Liberal group stated that "third world development, climate change and the fight against international crime are the biggest challenges".
Spraševal se je, kako rešiti te probleme, če države ne bodo več prispevale k proračunu.
He wondered how these could be tackled if countries would not contribute more to the budget.
Vsa ta politična stališča so zastopana v Odboru za proračun Parlamenta, ki odobri letne izdatke EU.
All of these political viewpoints are represented in the Parliament's Budget Committee which approves the annual expenditure of the EU.
Kmetijstvo – zakaj je tako pomembno?
Agriculture - why is it such a sacred cow?
Zakaj je kmetijstvo nekaj tako posebnega?
Why is agriculture so special?
Zakaj ima v EU posebno mesto in je vključeno v njene ustanovne pogodbe?
Why does it have a special place in the EU and is enshrined in the founding Treaties of the Union?
Na splošno so za to trije vzroki; prvič, javna intervencija stabilizira kmetijske cene, ki bi sicer nihale zaradi vremenskih pogojev.
There are three reasons generally highlighted; firstly public intervention stabilises agriculture prices which would otherwise fluctuate due to weather conditions.
Če se cene dvignejo, povzročijo inflacijo, saj hrana običajno predstavlja 20 % gospodinjskega proračuna.
If prices go up, it will fuel inflation, as food generally accounts for 20% of a household budget.
Drugi argument je, da je samozadostnost oskrbe s hrano zaželena politično, gospodarsko in s psihološkega vidika.
The second argument is that self sufficiency in food supply is desirable politically, economically and from a psychological point of view.
To bo zaščitilo Evropo pred mednarodnimi trgovinskimi pogoji.
This will protect Europe from international trading conditions.
Tretji vzrok je spodbujanje kmetov, da ostanejo na podeželju ter upravljajo in vzdržujejo podeželsko okolje in pokrajino.
Finally, the third is to encourage farmers to stay on the land to manage and sustain the rural environment and landscape.
Ti argumenti so deležni tako velike podpore kot kritike.
These arguments have powerful supporters and critics.
Države, ki so najpogosteje povezane z zaščito kmetijstva, so Francija (ki predstavlja 22,5 odstotka kmetijske proizvodnje), Irska, Belgija in Španija.
The countries most often associated with protecting agriculture are France, (which accounts for 22.5 percent of agricultural production) Ireland, Belgium and Spain.
Obstaja tudi organizirana kmetijska interesna skupina z več kot 130 kmetijskimi skupinami po vsej EU.
There is also the organised farm lobby - with over 130 EU-wide agriculture groups alone.
Za razliko od kmetijske skupnosti, ki predstavlja jasen del prebivalstva, ti nimajo jasno opredeljenega skupnega interesa in so bolj razpršeni.
Unlike the farming community who constitute a clear section of the population, they do not have a clearly defined common interest and are more widely dispersed.
SKP je vse pogosteje v središču pozornosti borcev proti revščini, ki trdijo, da kmetom iz držav v razvoju preprečuje, da bi imeli pravičen trg za svoje proizvode.
Increasingly, the CAP also finds itself under the spotlight from anti-poverty campaigners who claim that it prevents farmers in developing countries having a fair market for their produce.
Nekateri so se združili v skupino „naj revščina postane preteklost“, ki se bori za pravičnejšo trgovino in boljši dostop manjših kmetov iz sveta v razvoju na zahodne trge.
Some have coalesced around the "make poverty history" group which campaigns for fairer trade and better access to western markets for small farmers in the developing world.
Ocena – posledice SKP
Assessment - the consequences of the CAP
Je SKP dosegla te cilje?
Has it succeeded?
Učinkovitost se je vsekakor povečala zaradi posodabljanja.
Efficiency has certainly increased due to modernisation.
Medtem ko je število oseb, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom, po ustanovitvi SKP upadlo za 60 odstotkov, se proizvodnja od 70. let prejšnjega stoletja stalno povečuje za približno 1,7 odstotka letno.
While the number of people engaged in agriculture has fallen by 60 percent since the CAP was created - output has increased steadily by about 1.7 per annum since the 1970's.
Kmetijski prihodki so se v primerjavi z drugimi sektorji povečali; zlasti uspešne so večje kmetije in tiste, ki proizvajajo mlečne proizvode, žita in govedino (glede na tiste, ki proizvajajo sredozemske proizvode).
Agricultural incomes have grown according to other sectors - larger farms have done particular well, as have those who produce dairy products, cereal and beef (relative to those that produce Mediterranean goods).
Poleg tega so se trgi stabilizirani in EU je dosegla samozadostnost proizvodnje hrane, ki jo omogoča njeno podnebje.
In addition markets have been stabilised and the EU is self-sufficient in the food that its climate could support.
Primerne cene so stvar razprave.
As for reasonable prices, that's a matter of debate.
Kljub tem uspehom je prevlada SKP v EU otežila izvajanje drugih politik.
Despite these successes, the dominance that the CAP has had over the EU has made it difficult to pursue other policies.
SKP je povzročila tudi številne trgovinske spore, tudi z Ameriko.
The CAP has also led to many trading disputes, not least with America.
Nenazadnje intenzivno kmetovanje, ki ga spodbuja SKP, nedvomno škodi okolju in vpliva na varnost hrane.
Finally, the intensive farming practices that the CAP encourages have undoubtedly damaged the environment and had food safety implications.
Najočitnejši dokaz je bil izbruh BSE.
The most obvious would be the outbreak of BSE.
Težave je EU skušala rešiti z reformami leta 1992 in 1999 ter z ustanovitvijo Evropske agencije za varno hrano leta 2002.
These concerns have attempted to be addressed in the reforms of 1992 and 1999 and the creation of a European Food Safety Authority in 2002.
Zagotovo pa bo kmetijska politika v prihodnosti v Evropski uniji še naprej prevladovala .
The only certainty for the future is that agriculture policy will continue to dominate the European Union.
20050819STO00988 Spletna stran Evropske unije o kmetijstvu Oddelek Evropske komisije, pristojen za vodenje SKP Razlaga SKP – Brošura Evropske komisije (v angleščini) Spletna stran Evropske unije o proračunu Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja Evropskega parlamenta (v angleščini) Spletna stran Evropskega parlamenta; Proračunski odbor (v angleščini) Spletna stran Evropske agencije za varno hrano (v angleščini) Sapirjevo poročilo iz leta 2003 o „Agendi za rastočo Evropo“ (v angleščini)
20050819STO00988 European Union' website on Agriculture CAP explained - Brochure from the European Commission European Union's website on the budget European Parliament's Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development European Parliament's Committee on Budgets Website of the European Food Safety Authority The 2003 Sapir Report on "An Agenda for a growing Europe"
Imate pomisleke glede evra?
Are you sceptical about the euro?
Se spomnite januarja 2002, ko so v obtok prišli evri?
Do you remember January 2002 when the euro was launched as cash?
Prehod je, navkljub nekaj spodrsljajem, uspel bolje, kot so si lahko želeli tudi najbolj goreči zagovorniki evra.
Despite a few glitches, the changeover was smoother than even the most enthusiastic supports of the euro could have wished.
Kakšni pa so naši občutki do nove valute po treh letih?
However, three years later, how do we feel about it as a currency?
Nam je zlezla pod kožo, kot je to uspelo "starim" valutam?
Has it forced its way into our affections the way the "old" currencies did?
Sodeč po nedavnem poročilu Evropskega parlamenta, del javnosti v dvanajstih državah evroobmočja "negativno dojema evro".
According to a recent report by the European Parliament some members of the public in the 12 countries of the euro zone "have a negative perception of the euro".
Poleg tega poročilo zlovešče ugotavlja, da "ta težnja narašča ".
Ominously, the report goes on to state that "this tendency is on the rise".
V zadnjem poročilu je 66% vprašanih izrazilo podporo valuti, kar je enajst odstotnih točk manj, kot ob njeni uvedbi leta 2002.
In the last report, 66% of people questioned expressed their support for the currency, that's 11 points down since its introduction in 2002.
To je spodbudilo Parlament, da je s prepričljivo večino podprl oživitev kampanje obveščanja za poudarjanje pozitivnih strani evra.
This has prompted the Parliament to vote overwhelmingly in support of a renewed communication campaign to emphasise what it sees as the benefits of the euro.
Med te uvršča:
These include:
Jules Maaten, nizozemski liberalni poslanec v EP, ki je spravil poročilo skozi Parlament, verjame, da "je evro verjetno eden od najuspešnejših evropskih projektov doslej.
The man who steered the report through the Parliament, the Dutch liberal MEP Jules Maaten, believes that "the euro is probably one of the most successful European projects ever.
Zahvaljujoč evru smo imeli najdaljše obdobje nizke inflacije, nizkih obrestnih mer in monetarne stabilnosti doslej, četudi je bil svet zelo nemiren v teh zadnjih nekaj letih."
Thanks to the euro we have had the longest period of low inflation, low interest rates and monetary stability ever, even if the world has been very turbulent these last few years".
Poročilo tudi poziva, da se poleg boljšega obveščanja o evru, večja pozornost posveti tudi vprašanjem, ali naj evroobmočje obdrži nepriljubljene kovance za en cent in ali se bankovec za 500 evrov ni izkazal kot pretirano privlačen za ponarejanje in pranje denarja.
As well as better communication about the euro, the report also calls for greater scrutiny to be paid to whether the euro zone needs to keep the unloved 1 cent coin and whether the 500 euro note is proving too tempting for fraudsters and money launderers.
Ta zadnja pobuda je posledica zaskrbljenosti, da sta davčna nedisciplina v nekaterih državah članicah EU ter zavrnitev Evropske ustave v Franciji in na Nizozemskem omajali zaupanje v evro.
This latest initiative comes amid concerns that fiscal indiscipline in some EU member states and the results of the French and Dutch "No" votes to the European constitution have damaged confidence in the euro.
Za valuto je bilo od njene uvedbe verjetno najbolj škodljivo dojemanje potrošnikov, še posebej v Nemčiji, da trgovci prehod neupravičeno izkoriščajo za zaokrožanje cen.
Since the launch of the currency perhaps the most damaging aspect has been the perception by consumers, particularly in Germany, that retailers were unfairly taking advantage of the changeover to round up prices.
Na osnovi teh izkušenj se je estonska vlada odločila, da bo davke zaokroževala navzdol, vladne podpore pa navzgor.
Learning from this experience, the Estonian government has decided to round taxes down and round government subsidies up.
Med desetimi novimi državami članicami, ki so vstopile v EU leta 2004, bo Estonija skupaj z Litvo in Slovenijo v skupini prvih, ki bodo prevzele evro.
Estonia, along with Lithuania and Slovenia, are frontrunners of the ten new countries that joined the EU in 2004 to change over to the euro.
Doslej je sedem držav svoje valute vezalo na evro.
Thus far seven countries have linked their currencies to the euro.
Končna odločitev o njihovi pripravljenosti za prevzem evra pa bo sprejeta potem, ko bodo dve leti "brez hujših napetosti" vključene v evropski mehanizem deviznih tečajev.
They will have to be members for two years "without severe tensions" prior to final examination on whether they are really ready to join the euro.
Ko pristopijo k enotni valuti, se bodo pridružile dvanajstim državam sedanjega evroobmočja in nekaj državam, ki niso članice EU, a uporabljajo valuto zaradi praktičnih razlogov - Črna gora, Vatikan, Monako in San Marino.
When they do join the single currency, they will join the existing twelve countries of the present euro zone plus the non-EU countries that use the currency for practical reasons - Kosovo, Montenegro, Vatican City, Monaco and San Marino.
Tako bodo med članicami EU, ki še niso pristopile k evru, ostale le Velika Britanija, Švedska in Danska.
That will leave only the UK, Sweden and Denmark as EU members who have not joined the euro.
"Potipati, pregledati in premikati"
"Feel, look and tilt"
Aprila letos je Parlament previdno pozdravil pobude za izboljšanje sodelovanja med različnimi državami v boju proti ponarejanju valute.
In April of this year the Parliament gave a cautious welcome to moves aimed at improving cooperation between different countries in combating currency fraud.
Evropska centralna banka je samo lani v okviru boja proti goljufijam iz obtoka potegnila preko 44 milijonov evrov.
Last year alone the European Central Bank withdrew over 44 million euro from circulation to combat fraud.
Ta problem so še zaostrili visoko kvalitetni digitalni skenerji in fotokopirni stroji, ki izdelajo dovolj prepričljive kopije, da jim nekateri ljudje nasedejo.
The problem has been aggravated by high quality digital scanners and photocopiers producing replicas good enough to fool some people.
Šest držav je kot odgovor na to predlagalo, da se Europol imenuje za osrednjo evropsko oblast za ukrepanje proti ponarejanju.
In response to this six states have called for Europol to be named Europe's central authority for anti forgery measures.
Parlament je ta predlog zavrnil in se zavzel za priporočilo, da Europol okrepi sodelovanje z obstoječimi nacionalnimi organi, ki so pristojni za boj proti ponarejanju.
This view was rejected by the Parliament who voted to recommend that Europol increase cooperation with the existing national authorities charged with combating fraud.
Če ste v dvomih glede pristnosti bankovca evra, je uradni nasvet ta, da ga potipate, pozorno pregledate in ga nato premikate, da preverite pravilno delovanje holograma.
If you are concerned about a euro note, the official advice is to feel it, examine it closely and then tilt it to see if the hologram works correctly.
Galileo - enotni trg gre v orbito
Galileo - the single market goes into orbit
Morda ste že slišali za evropsko kmetijsko politiko ali evropsko ribiško politiko, kaj pa za evropsko vesoljsko politiko?
You may have heard of European agriculture policy, or European fisheries policy - but how about European space policy?
Zveni nekako nezemeljsko - dokler se ne zaveš, da EU manjka le nekaj let do lastnih satelitov v orbiti.
It all sounds somewhat unworldly - until you realise that the EU is just a few years away from having its own orbiting satellites.
Evropski parlament je odločen, da septembra letos odobri dodatno milijardo evrov finančnih sredstev, s katerimi naj bi zagotovili nadaljnji razvoj vesoljskega programa Galileo - morebiti celo najbolj ambicioznega projekta EU doslej.
This September, the European Parliament is set to authorise a further €1 billion in funding to ensure the continued development of the Galileo space programme - arguably the EU's most ambitious project so far.
Galileo je poskus EU, da bi ustvarila lasten satelitski navigacijski sistem civilnega značaja, ki bo povsem neodvisen od obstoječe ameriške tehnologije.
Galileo is an attempt by the EU to create its own civilian satellite navigation system that will be entirely independent of existing American technology.
Trenutno sta na svetu dva taka satelitska navigacijska sistema, ameriški (GPS) in ruski (GLONASS).
At present the world has two such satellite navigation systems, the American (GPS) and the Russian (GLONASS) system.
Oba je razvila vojska, vendar je bil samo ameriški uspešno uporabljen v civilne namene.
Both were developed by the military although only the American system has successfully been applied to civilian usage.
Če je temu tako, čemu torej razvijati specifično evropski sistem?
Given this, why develop a specifically European system?
Glavni namen je upravljanje evropske prometne infrastrukture - železnic, cestnih in morskih poti.
The main purpose is the management of Europe's transport infrastructure - railways, roads and sea lanes.
Zagovorniki Galilea trdijo, da je te povezave mogoče učinkoviteje upravljati z uporabo satelitske tehnologije.
Supporters of Galileo argue that these can be more effectively managed using satellite technology.
Po mnenju Evropske komisije, ki koordinira projekt, so relativne koristi Galilea, "da bo zagotovil pravo javno storitev, da bo namenjen civilni uporabi in bo natančnejši".
According to the European Commission who are coordinating the project, the relative benefits of Galileo "are that it will provide a real public service, be specifically for civilian use and offer greater precision".
Vse to bodo omogočili razporeditev satelitov in zemeljski sprejemniki.
This is thanks to the constellation of satellites and ground based receivers.
V bistvu je Galileo zrasel iz znatno povečane infrastrukture globalnega satelitskega navigacijskega sistema (GNSS).
Galileo has in essence grown out of the massive increase in Global Satellite Navigation System (GNSS) infrastructure.
Ocenjujejo, da je letni delež rasti te tehnologije 25% in da bo do leta 2020 nameščenih že osupljivih 3 milijarde sprejemnikov.
It is estimated that the annual growth rate of this technology is 25% and that by 2020 there will be a staggering 3 billion receivers in place.
Ob lansiranju satelitov Galileo se bo količina razpoložljive infrastrukture podvojila.
The launching of the Galileo satellites will double the amount of available infrastructure.
Obstoječi evropski geostacionarni navigacijski prekrivni sistem (EGNOS - European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service) razvijajo od leta 1993.
The existing EGNOS system (European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service) has been developing since 1993.
To je pravzaprav prvi korak Evrope v satelitski navigaciji in uporablja 40 zemeljskih postaj, razporejenih po vsej Evropi, ki beležijo, uravnavajo in izboljšujejo podatke iz ameriškega sistema GSP.
It is in effect Europe's first step in satellite navigation and uses 40 ground stations scattered throughout Europe designed to record, adjust and improve data from the American system GPS.
Galileo so razvili s pomočjo te tehnologije in njenih izboljšav.
Galileo has been developed using and improving upon this technology.
Vesoljska tekma EU-ZDA?
EU-US space race?
Razumljivo je, da je razvijanje Galilea sprožilo vprašanja o tem, kako natančno bo deloval ob ameriškem sistemu GPS.
Naturally, the development of Galileo has prompted questions about exactly how it will work alongside the American GPS system.
Bosta tekmovala med seboj ali se vzajemno dopolnjevala?
Will they be competitors or are they mutually complementary?
V zadnjih nekaj letih je prišlo do političnega in tehnološkega konsenza, da je združljivost med GPS in Galileom najboljša in takorekoč edina pot naprej.
Over the last few years a political and technological consensus has emerged that compatibility between GPS and Galileo is the best, and indeed only, way forward.
Tehnični cilj je zagotoviti, da bo lahko vsak uporabljal tako signale GPS kot Galilea z enim samim sprejemnikom.
The technical objective is to ensure that everyone will be able to use both GPS and Galileo signals with a single receiver.
Kljub temu pa se je težko izogniti besedam "uporaba v civilne namene", ki se v uradni literaturi o Galileu nenavadno pogosto pojavljajo.
Nevertheless, when reading about Galileo it is impossible to miss the words "civilian use" which appear conspicuously frequently in the official literature.
Razlog zanje je seveda jasen: ovreči sum o možni uporabi tehnologije za ne-civilne namene v prihodnosti, če bi EU še najprej razvijala lastne vojaške zmogljivosti, ki ne bi potrebovale ameriške tehnologije.
This is clearly to play down any suspicion that the technology could one day be used for non-civilian purposes should the EU continue to develop its own military capabilities - independent of the need for American technology.
"Bruselj, vzleteli smo"
" Brussels, we have lift off "
Po treh letih se razvojna faza programa približuje koncu in leta 2006 se bo pričela "izvajalna" faza (gradnja in izstrelitev satelitov), ki bo zaključena leta 2013.
The development phase of the programme is drawing to a close after three years and the "deployment" phase (building and launching the satellites) will begin in 2006 and be completed in 2013.
Pričakovati je, da bomo Galileove satelite lahko v celoti pričeli uporabljati najhitreje 2010.
It is expected that the full commercial application of the Galileo satellites can begin in 2010 at the earliest.
Evropska vesoljska agencija (ESA) in zunanji izvajalci bodo zadolženi za logistiko izstrelitve satelita v orbito.
The European Space Agency (ESA) and outside contractors will be responsible for the logistics of putting the satellite in orbit.
Kdo bo plačal?
Who will pay for it?
Četudi so praktične koristi Galilea jasno razvidne, moramo upoštevati, da vesoljska tehnologija ni poceni.
While the practical benefits of Galileo are well laid out, it is worth considering that space technology does not come cheap.
Prav zato Evropski parlament skrbno tehta stroške.
This is why the European Parliament has been giving careful consideration to the cost.
Doslej je EU porabila 650 milijonov evrov (1) proračuna za razvoj projekta.
Thus far, the EU has spent €650 million (1) of its budget on developing the project.
Enak prispevek so dale države, ki so članice ESA.
This funding has been matched by the countries who are members of the ESA.
Postavitev satelitov v orbito bo stala 2,1 milijarde evrov, od tega bo 500 milijonov sredstev EU.
To put the satellites in orbit will cost €2.1 billion, of which €500 million will come from EU funds.
Preostali del bo zagotovil privatni sektor.
The private sector will provide the rest.
Ko bo to izvedeno, bo potrebnih nadaljnih 500 milijonov evrov (2) za komercialno uporabo satelita od leta 2010 naprej.
Once this is completed a further €500 million (2) will be needed to operate the satellite commercially from 2010.
Ga.Barsi-Pataki podpira Galilea, saj le-ta predstavlja prvi primer za specifično "v Evropi narejen projekt".
Mrs Barsi-Pataki supports Galileo as it establishes a precedent as a specifically "made in Europe project".
Evropski parlament je ob odobritvi 1 milijarde evrov evropskega denarja zagotovil, da v proračunu za ta projekt ne bo primankljaja.
By authorising the spending of €1 billion of European money the European Parliament is ensuring that there will be no budget shortfalls in the project.
Imenovan bo nadzorni organ za nadzor nad razporeditvijo sredstev, ki bo zagotovil ustrezno porabo denarja.
To ensure the money is properly spent a Supervising Authority will be appointed to oversee the distribution of funds.
Predvideno je, da bo dobiček iz komercialne uporabe zagotovil dolgoročno finančno stabilnost projekta.
It is envisaged that commercial revenues will ensure the long term financial stability of the project.
O Galileu
The man himself
Galileo Galilei (1564 - 1642), italijanski astronom in fizik, je znan po svojih besednih in matematičnih sposobnostih, s katerimi je dokazal Kopernikovo teorijo, po kateri naj bi Zemlja dejansko krožila okrog Sonca.
Galileo Galilei (1564 -1642) the Italian astronomer and physicist is famous for using his verbal and mathematical skills to prove the theory of Copernicus that in fact the earth does rotate around the sun.
S tem si je nakopal obtožbo katoliške cerkve in prisiljen je bil javno preklicati svojo trditev ter živeti v hišnem priporu.
This brought him denunciation from the Catholic Church and he was forced to recant and was placed under house arrest.
(1): 550 milijonov evrov iz proračuna za vseevropsa omrežja (peti proračunski okvir) in 100 milijonov evrov iz šestega proračunskega okvirja
(1) : €550 million from the Trans-European Network budget (5th budget framework) and €100 million from the 6th budget framework
(2) : Ocena Price Waterhouse Cooper v poročilu iz 2001
(2) : Estimate by Price Waterhouse Cooper in a 2001 Report