natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Po 9/11, 3/11 in londonskih bombnih eksplozijah je EU sprejela protiteroristično strategijo in akcijski načrt za boj proti terorizmu, okvirni sklep o terorizmu in več pobud za boljše usklajevanje med državami članicami samimi ter med državami članicami in evropskimi institucijami ob podpori koordinatorja EU za boj proti terorizmu.
Since 9/11, 3/11 and the London bombings, the EU has adopted an EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy an EU Counter-Terrorism Action Plan, a framework decision on terrorism and several initiatives to strengthen the coordination between the Member States and between the latter and the European institutions with the support of the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator.
Na medinstitucionalni ravni EP uradno ni bil vključen v dogajanje, vendar je leta 2006 Svet začel „politični dialog na visoki ravni o boju proti terorizmu med glavnimi evropskimi institucijami, vključenimi v boj proti terorizmu“ in s tem poudaril pomen demokratične odgovornosti.
At interinstitutional level there has been no formal involvement of the EP but the Council launched in 2006 the 'High Level Political Dialogue on Counter-Terrorism between the main European Institutions involved in the fight against terrorism', highlighting the importance of democratic accountability.
Na upravni ravni sta bili opravljeni že dve strokovni presoji med državami članicami o izvajanju strategije Evropske unije, Europol, Eurojust in SITCEN pa so pred kratkim začeli s svojo oceno razvoja ogroženosti na evropski ravni.
At administrative level there have already been two peer evaluations between the Member States on the implementation of the European Union Strategy, and Europol, Eurojust and the SITCEN have just started their assessment of the evolution of the threat at European level.
Zdaj se zdi, da je EU ne glede na vse omenjene pobude od takrat doživela številne poskuse terorističnih napadov, zaradi česar se zastavlja vrsta vprašanj:
Now it appears that, notwithstanding all the initiatives cited above, the EU has since experienced a number of attempted terrorist attacks, which gives rise to a number of questions:
Ali namerava Evropska komisija, z vključitvijo Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov, izvesti celovito oceno vseh protiterorističnih ukrepov, ki so bili sprejeti do sedaj, kot tudi oceno njihove učinkovitosti in izvajanja s strani držav članic?
Does the Commission intend to carry out, with the involvement of the European Parliament and of the national parliaments, a comprehensive evaluation of all counter-terrorism measures adopted until now as well as an assessment of their effectiveness and level of implementation by Member States?
Kakšno vlogo bodo imele pri tem države članice?
And how will Member States be associated?
Kako namerava Komisija odpraviti pomanjkljivosti, označene v zadnjem poročilu Europol-SITCEN o terorizmu, ter se odzvati na odgovore držav članic na vprašalnik Eurojusta iz leta 2006 o izvajanju okvirnega sklepa o terorizmu?
How does the Commission intend to overcome the shortcomings raised in the last Europol/SITCEN report on terrorism and take stock of the Member States' replies to the 2006 Eurojust questionnaire on the implementation of the framework decision on terrorism?
Kateri drugi ukrepi so bili sprejeti, vendar ne pravilno izvedeni, kdo jih ni pravilno izvedel in zakaj ne?
Which other measures have been adopted but not correctly implemented, and by whom and for what reasons?
Ali se bo Komisija zdaj osredotočila na izvajanje trenutnih ukrepov ali pa se pripravljajo kakšni novi predlogi ukrepov?
Will the Commission now focus on the implementation of the current measures, or are there any current proposals in the pipeline?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami in Evropsko unijo v tem oziru?
How does the Commission evaluate the information sharing between Member States and the European Union in this context?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je potrebno večje vzajemno zaupanje med organi EU in službami držav članic za kazenski pregon in boj proti terorizmu?
Would the Commission agree that greater mutual trust is needed between EU authorities and Member States' law enforcement and counter-terrorism services?
Kakšen pravni okvir za to predvideva Komisija in kakšno vlogo je treba pri tem nameniti SITCEN-u kot orodju za nadzor in usklajevanje terorističnih preiskav?
Which legal framework does the Commission foresee for these formations and which role is to be given in this context to SITCEN as a monitoring and coordinating tool in terrorist investigations?
Ali Komisija glede na odstop g. de Vriesa februarja 2007 meni, da je treba obdržati mesto koordinatorja EU za boj proti terorizmu in s kakšnim mandatom?
Considering the resignation of Mr de Vries in February 2007, does the Commission consider that the role of the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator should be maintained and, if so, with what mandate?
Kako namerava Komisija okrepiti sprejemanje protiteroristične strategije s strani državljanov EU, preglednost in demokratično odgovornost ter sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta?
How does the Commission intend to strengthen EU citizens' acceptance of the anti-terrorism strategy, its transparency and democratic accountability and the involvement of the European Parliament?
Ali bo Komisija zagotovila spoštovanje člena 6 PEU?
Will the Commission ensure respect for Article 6 of the TEU?
Kar zadeva vpletenost tretjih držav, kako namerava Komisija razvijati čezatlantsko sodelovanje v boju proti terorizmu in kriminalu po vrhu EU-ZDA aprila 2007 in ali ga bo razvijalo z metodami, ki bodo skladne s členom 6 PEU ter s predvidenimi dogodki na naslednji medvladni konferenci, kot priporoča tudi Parlament v resoluciji o domnevni uporabi evropskih držav za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje ujetnikov s strani ameriške obveščevalne agencije CIA?
As regards the involvement of third countries, following the EU-US summit in April 2007, how does the Commission intend to develop transatlantic cooperation to combat terrorism and crime, and will it be pursued through methods which comply with Article 6 of the TEU and with foreseeable developments at the next IGC, as recommended also by the EP resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0052/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0052/07
Zadeva: Mednarodni sporazum o prepovedi kasetnega streliva, nadgradnja deklaracije iz Osla
Subject: International treaty to ban cluster munitions - follow-up to the Oslo Declaration
Od sprejetja deklaracije iz Osla dne 23. februarja 2007, ki poziva k mednarodnemu sporazumu o prepovedi kasetnega streliva na svetovni ravni, in konference o kasetnem strelivu, ki je sledila 24. in 25. maja 2007 v Limi, se je približno 80 držav odločilo podpreti proces, ki vodi k sprejetju takšnega sporazuma, med njimi skoraj vse države članice EU.
Since the adoption of the Oslo Declaration on 23 February 2007 calling for an international treaty to globally ban cluster munitions, and the follow-up Lima conference on cluster munitions which took place on 24-25 May 2007, around 80 states have decided to support the process leading to such a treaty, including almost all the EU Member States.
V Belgiji bo na to temo oktobra 2007 potekalo regionalno srečanje na visoki ravni.
Belgium will host a high level regional meeting on this issue at the end of October 2007.
Decembra bo na Dunaju potekala tretja svetovna konferenca, ki bo sledila srečanjema v Oslu in Limi.
In December there will be a third global conference in Vienna, following up the Oslo and Lima meetings.
Kakšne pobude je Komisija sprejela za nadgradnjo prejšnjih resolucij Parlamenta v podporo procesu iz Osla, zlasti resolucije o konvenciji o prepovedi biološkega in toksičnega orožja, o kasetnih bombah in klasičnem orožju z dne 16. novembra 2006, v kateri poziva EU, naj podpre pobude „za vzpostavitev celovite in učinkovite konvencije za prepoved kasetnega streliva po vsem svetu“?
What initiatives has the Commission taken to follow up Parliament's previous resolutions supporting the Oslo process, in particular the resolution on the Convention on the Prohibition of Biological and Toxin Weapons (BTWC), cluster bombs and conventional arms of 16 November 2006, asking the EU to support the initiative 'to establish a comprehensive and effective convention to ban cluster munitions worldwide'?
Ali namerava Komisija sodelovati na srečanjih v Bruslju in na Dunaju ali kako drugače prispevati k pogajanjem in na kakšen način?
Is the Commission planning to participate in both the Brussels and Vienna meetings or to contribute in a different manner to the negotiations, and in what way?
Kakšne pobude je sprejela Komisija, da bi spodbudila države članice EU k sprejetju nacionalnih ukrepov za prepoved kasetnih bomb, in da bi na mednarodni ravni spodbudila vse države, ki še niso podpisale deklaracije iz Osla, to storile?
What initiatives has the Commission taken to encourage EU Member States to adopt national measures banning cluster bombs, and at international level to encourage all states which have not yet done so to sign the Oslo Declaration?
Kakšne pobude prevzema Komisija, da bi podpirala izvajanje obstoječih obveznosti v okviru konvencije o prepovedi ali omejitvi uporabe nekaterih vrst klasičnega orožja in še posebej 5. protokola o eksplozivnih ostankih vojne?
What initiatives is the Commission taking to support the implementation of existing commitments within the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) and specifically the Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War?
Katere programe in projekte, povezane s pomočjo skupnostim in posameznikom, ki jih je prizadelo neeksplodirano kasetno strelivo, čiščenjem kontaminiranih območij, izobraževanjem o tveganjih in uničevanjem zalog prepovedanega kasetnega streliva, Komisija podpira ali namerava podpreti v tretjih državah?
What programmes and projects does the Commission support or plan to support in third countries as regards assistance to communities and individuals affected by unexploded cluster munitions, the clearance of contaminated areas, risk education and destruction of stockpiles of prohibited cluster munitions?
Ali bo Komisija v zvezi z nedavnimi mednarodnimi pobudami razmislila o pripravi mednarodne konference o vlogi EU pri odpravljanju družbeno-gospodarskih, humanitarnih in razvojnih posledic eksplozivnih ostankov vojne, ki nastopijo po konfliktih?
Will the Commission consider holding an international conference on the role of the EU in tackling post-conflict socio-economic, humanitarian and developmental consequences of explosive remnants of war in the context of recent international initiatives?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0053/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0053/07
Ali namerava Svet izvesti celovito oceno vseh protiterorističnih ukrepov, ki so bili sprejeti do sedaj, in kakšno vlogo bodo imeli pri tem nacionalni parlamenti in Evropski parlament?
Does the European Council intend to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of all counter-terrorism measures adopted to date and how will it involve national parliaments and the EP in this?
Kako namerava Svet odpraviti pomanjkljivosti, označene v zadnjem poročilu Europol-SITCEN o terorizmu, ter se odzvati na odgovore držav članic na vprašalnik Eurojusta iz leta 2006 o izvajanju okvirnega sklepa o terorizmu?
How does the Council intend to overcome the shortcomings raised in the last Europol-SITCEN report on terrorism and take stock of the Member States' replies to the 2006 Eurojust questionnaire on the implementation of the Framework Decision on Terrorism?
Ali se bo Svet zdaj osredotočil na izvajanje trenutnih ukrepov?
Will the Council focus on the implementation of the current measures.
Če ne, ali se pripravljajo kakšni novi ukrepi?
If not, are there any new measures in the pipeline?
Ali Svet glede na odstop g. de Vriesa februarja 2007 meni, da je treba obdržati mesto koordinatorja EU za boj proti terorizmu in s kakšnim mandatom?
Considering the resignation of Mr de Vries in February 2007, does the Council consider that the role of the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator has to be maintained and with which mandate?
Ali bo Svet zagotovil spoštovanje člena 6 PEU?
Will the Council ensure respect of Article 6 TEU?
Kako se je Svet odzval na končno poročilo začasnega odbora TDIP in poročilo Sveta Evrope iz leta 2007, ki ga je pripravil g.
What is the reaction of the Council to the TDIP temporary committee's final report and the 2007 CoE report by Dick Marty (PACE Doc.
Kako se Svet loteva te zadeve?
How will the Council deal with the issues raised?
Kako namerava Svet ponovno sistematično preučiti svoje postopke, da bodo vanje vključene še druge zadeve?
How does the Council plan to review its procedures in a systematic way over and above this specific case?
Bodo za vse primere na seznamu veljali enaki ukrepi v skladu z uredbo (ES) št. 2580/2001 , kot je bila nazadnje posodobljena?
Will the same measures apply to all cases on the list pursuant to (EC) Regulation No 2580/2001 , in all its updated versions?
Ali bo Svet preučil sistem, ki bi omogočal parlamentarni nadzor politike te uredbe in postopek sodnega nadzora?
Will the Council consider a system that allows for parliamentary scrutiny of policy under that regulation and for a judicial review procedure?
UL L 344 z dne 28.12.2001, str.
OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0054/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0054/07
Zadeva: Prizadevanja EU za končanje osamitve skupnosti ciprskih Turkov
Subject: EU efforts to end the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot Community
Po negativnem izidu referendumov v Republiki Ciper dne 24. aprila 2004 in posledične nezmožnosti, da se zagotovi pristop združenega Cipra k Evropski uniji, je Svet 26. aprila 2004 oznanil svojo odločitev, da osamitev skupnosti ciprskih Turkov konča.
Following the negative outcome of the referenda in the Republic of Cyprus on 24 April 2004, and the resulting failure to secure the accession to the European Union of a united Cyprus, the Council expressed on 26 April 2004 its determination to put an end to the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community.
Čeprav sta bili sprejeti uredba o zeleni črti in finančna pomoč, pa ni bilo nikakršnega napredka glede predlagane neposredne trgovinske ureditve.
While the Green Line and Financial Assistance regulations have been adopted, there has been no progress as regards the proposed Direct Trade regulation.
Verodostojnost Evropske unije, da bo izpolnila lastne zaveze, je zato vprašljiva, in ciprski Turki, ki podpirajo celovito rešitev, so osamljeni in pod političnim pritiskom zagrizenih nacionalistov.
The credibility of the European Union in living up to its own commitments is being questioned and Turkish Cypriots who are in favour of a comprehensive settlement remain isolated and under political pressure from nationalistic hard-liners.
Kakšne pobude namerava sprožiti portugalsko predsedstvo, da bi bil dosežen sporazum o neposredni trgovinski ureditvi?
What initiatives does the Portuguese Presidency-in-Office intend to undertake in order to reach an agreement on the Direct Trade regulation?
Katere vmesne ukrepe bi lahko uvedli, da bi olajšali trgovinske in gospodarske povezave s skupnostjo ciprskih Turkov v primeru, če bo sedanji zastoj trajal še naprej?
What kind of interim measures could be put in place to facilitate trade and commercial links with the Turkish Cypriot Community in case the current deadlock in the Council continues?
Katere dodatne ukrepe bo sprejelo portugalsko predsedstvo, da bi izpolnilo zaveze, ki jih je aprila 2004 sprejela Evropska unija, zlasti glede sodelovanja turških univerz na Cipru v bolonjskem procesu in glede dostopa turških študentov s Cipra do programov izmenjave študentov v EU?
What additional measures will the Portuguese Presidency-in-Office undertake to fulfil the commitments made by the European Union in April 2004, notably as regards the participation of Turkish Cypriot universities in the Bologna process and access to EU student exchange programmes for Turkish Cypriot students?
Kako portugalsko predsedstvo ocenjuje učinkovitost ukrepov EU, sprejetih za končanje osamitve skupnosti ciprskih Turkov?
How does the Portuguese Presidency-in-Office evaluate the effectiveness of the EU measures undertaken to end the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot Community?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0055/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0055/07
Po negativnem izidu glasovanj v Republiki Ciper dne 24. aprila 2004 in posledične nezmožnosti, da se zagotovi pristop združenega Cipra k Evropski uniji, je Svet 26. aprila 2004 oznanil svojo odločitev, da osamitev skupnosti ciprskih Turkov konča.
Following the negative outcome of the referenda in the Republic of Cyprus on 24 April 2004, and the resulting failure to secure the accession to the European Union of a united Cyprus, the Council expressed on 26 April 2004 its determination to put an end to the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community.
Čeprav sta bili sprejeti uredba o zeleni črti in finančna pomoč, ni bilo nikakršnega napredka glede predlagane neposredne trgovinske ureditve.
While the Green Line and Financial Assistance regulations have been adopted, there has been no progress as regards the proposed Direct Trade regulation.
Verodostojnost Evropske unije, da bi izpolnila lastne zaveze, je zato vprašljiva, in ciprski Turki, ki podpirajo celovito rešitev, so osamljeni in pod političnim pritiskom zagrizenih nacionalistov.
The credibility of the European Union in living up to its own commitments is being questioned and Turkish Cypriots who are in favour of a comprehensive settlement remain isolated and under political pressure from nationalistic hard-liners.
Kakšne pobude namerava sprožiti Komisija, da bi bilo laže doseči sporazum o neposredni trgovinski ureditvi?
What initiatives does the Commission intend to undertake in order to facilitate the reaching of an agreement on the Direct Trade regulation?
Katere dodatne ukrepe bo sprejela Komisija, da bi izpolnila zaveze, ki jih je aprila 2004 sprejela Evropska unija, zlasti glede udeležbe turških univerz na Cipru v bolonjskem procesu in glede dostopa turških študentov s Cipra do programov izmenjave študentov znotraj EU?
What additional measures will the Commission undertake to fulfil the commitments made by the European Union in April 2004, notably as regards the participation of Turkish Cypriot universities in the Bologna process and access to EU student exchange programmes for Turkish Cypriot students?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje učinkovitost ukrepov EU, sprejetih za končanje osamitve skupnosti ciprskih Turkov, še posebej glede izvajanja uredbe o zeleni črti?
How does the Commission evaluate the effectiveness of the EU measures undertaken to end the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot Community, in particular as regards the implementation of the Green Line regulation?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0056/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0056/07
Zadeva: Pogajanja o medregionalnem pridružitvenem sporazumu z Mercosurjem in novem dvostranskem strateškem partnerstvu z Brazilijo
Subject: Negotiations on an Interregional Association Agreement with Mercosur and the new bilateral strategic partnership with Brazil
Med vrhom EU–Brazilija 4. julija 2007 sta EU in Brazilija opozorili, da „pripisujeta velik pomen krepitvi odnosov med EU in Mercosurjem ter sta zavezani sklenitvi pridružitvenega sporazuma EU–Mercosur“.
During the EU-Brazil Summit of 4 July 2007, the EU and Brazil pointed out that ‘they attach high importance to strengthening EU - Mercosur relations and are committed to concluding the EU - Mercosur Association Agreement’.
V svoji resoluciji INI/2006/2035 o gospodarskih in trgovinskih odnosih med EU in Mercosurjem je Evropski parlament poudaril, da bi bilo treba sklenitev pridružitvenega sporazuma med EU in Mercosurjem obravnavati kot prednosten strateški cilj v zunanjih odnosih EU.
In its INI/2006/2035 resolution on economic and trade relations between the EU and Mercosur, the European Parliament stressed that the conclusion of an Association Agreement between the EU and Mercosur should be regarded as a priority strategic objective for the EU's external relations.
Evropski parlament je ponovno potrdil potrebo, da EU čim prej sklene celovit, ambiciozen in uravnotežen pridružitveni sporazum z Mercosurjem, ki temelji na treh stebrih: na političnem in institucionalnem poglavju, ki krepi demokratični dialog in politično sodelovanje, na poglavju o sodelovanju, ki spodbuja trajnosten gospodarski in socialni razvoj, ter na poglavju o trgovini.
The European Parliament reaffirmed the need for the EU to conclude, as soon as possible, a full, ambitious and balanced Association Agreement with Mercosur, based on three pillars: a political and institutional chapter reinforcing democratic dialogue and political cooperation, a cooperation chapter promoting sustainable economic and social development, and a trade chapter.
Kljub temu je Komisija objavila svoje sporočilo z dne 30. maja 2007 o dvostranskem strateškem partnerstvu z Brazilijo, ki glede omenjenih regionalnih prednostnih nalog pošilja protislovne signale.
Nevertheless, the Commission has released its Communication of 30 May 2007 on a bilateral strategic partnership with Brazil, which sends contradictory signals to the regional priorities set above.
Glede na navedeno:
In view of the above:
Ali bi lahko Komisija podrobno pojasnila najnovejše dogajanje v pogajanjih z Mercosurjem?
Could the Commission set out the latest developments in the Mercosur negotiations?
Ali bi lahko Komisija pojasnila, kako bi si bilo mogoče prizadevati za dvostransko strateško partnerstvo z Brazilijo, predstavljeno v njenem sporočilu z dne 30. maja 2007, ne da bi se s tem ogrozil dvoregionalni pristop, ki bi moral biti temelj naših odnosov z Latinsko Ameriko na splošno in zlasti z Mercosurjem?
Could the Commission explain how the bilateral strategic partnership with Brazil presented in its Communication of 30 May 2007 could be pursued without undermining the bi-regional approach that should be the cornerstone of our relations with Latin America in general and, in particular, with Mercosur?
Ali lahko Komisija zatrdi, da to novo partnerstvo ne bo ogrozilo regionalnega ravnotežja ter ne bo škodilo trgovinskim in gospodarskim odnosom EU z drugimi latinsko-ameriškimi partnerji?
Could the Commission state that this new partnership will not harm the regional balance and will not be to the detriment of the EU trade and economic relationship with other Latin American partners?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0057/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0057/07
, v imenu Začasni odbor za podnebne spremembe
, on behalf of the Temporary Committee on Climate Change
Zadeva: Strategija Sveta za konferenco o podnebnih spremembah na Baliju (COP 13 in COP/MOP 3)
Subject: Council's strategy for the Bali Conference on Climate Change (COP 13 and COP/MOP 3)
Kako namerava Svet zagotoviti, da se bodo vse pogodbenice konvencije o spremembi podnebja dogovorile o pogajalskem mandatu?
What is the Council's strategy to ensure that the Parties to the Climate Change Convention reach a negotiation mandate?
Kako bo Svet dosegel, da bodo s tem pogajalskim mandatom predvideni obvezujoči cilji zmanjšanja emisij, kar bi privedlo do potrebnega zmanjšanja svetovnih emisij v prihodnjih desetletjih?
What will the Council do to ensure that this negotiation mandate imposes binding emission targets which would lead to the necessary global emission reductions in the coming decades?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0058/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0058/07
Zadeva: Strategija Komisije za konferenco o podnebnih spremembah na Baliju (COP 13 in COP/MOP 3)
Subject: Commission's strategy for the Bali Conference on Climate Change (COP 13 and COP/MOP 3)
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da se bodo vse pogodbenice konvencije o spremembi podnebja dogovorile o pogajalskem mandatu?
What is the Commission's strategy to ensure that the Parties to the Climate Change Convention reach a negotiation mandate?