natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zakaj bi moral po vašem mnenju imeti glas Parlamenta večjo težo v zvezi s svobodo, varnostjo in pravico?
Why do you believe that Parliament should have a stronger voice in the area of freedom, security and justice?
Ni to le vprašanje „ambicioznosti institucije“?
Is this not purely an ‘institutional ambition’?
Cavada: Pristojnost ni cilj sama po sebi.
Cavada: Power is not an end in itself.
Parlament je razkril, da se „načela svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pravne države“ iz člena 6 Pogodbe o Uniji danes ne spoštujejo dovolj.
It is Parliament which condemns the fact that the ‘principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law’ formulated in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union have not been sufficiently implemented to date.
Primer zakonitega priseljevanja je zanimiv primer zakonodajne shizofrenije, saj Svet noče razširiti področja uporabe postopka soodločanja v skladu z določili veljavne pogodbe, čeprav vlade priznavajo utemeljenost takšne razširitve ob pripravah na podpis pogodbe, ki uzakonja ta postopek.
The case of legal immigration is an interesting example of legislative schizophrenia, in which the Council refuses to extend the scope of codecision in compliance with the provisions of the Treaty in force, but even the governments recognise the legitimacy of such an extension and are preparing to sign a treaty which will constitutionalise the procedure.
Institucije zagotovo ne naredijo vsega, vendar je organiziranost institucionalnega okvira bistvena za uspeh.
Obviously, the institutions do not do everything, but improving the institutional framework is essential for success.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu sklepa Sveta v zvezi s sporazumom ES/Kanada o obdelavi podatkov v zvezi s predhodnimi podatki o potnikih
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the EC and Canada on the processing of Advance Passenger Information
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0294 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT TA P6-TA-2005-0294 0 NOT XML V0//EN
Podpora Evropskega parlamenta „oranžni revoluciji“ v Ukrajini napoveduje korak k ambiciozni sosedski politiki razširjene EU.
The European Parliament’s support for the ‘Orange Revolution’ in Ukraine is a step towards an ambitious Wider Europe - Neighbourhood policy.
Zunanji odnosi
External relations
Kljub resni politični krizi ob zadnjih predsedniških volitvah v Ukrajini se je Evropski parlament trdno zavzel za umiritev razmer in spoštovanje demokracije.
In view of the serious political crisis over the recent presidential elections in Ukraine, the European Parliament made a firm commitment to resolving the situation and upholding democracy.
Takšen odnos kaže vizijo sosedske politike, v kateri demokracija in pravna država pogojujeta miroljubno sožitje med narodi in v kateri gospodarske in socialne reforme spremlja spoštovanje demokracije in človekovih pravic.
This stance reflects a vision of the neighbourhood policy in which democracy and the rule of law are preconditions for the peaceful coexistence of peoples, and where economic and social reform go hand in hand with respect for democracy and human rights.
Evropski parlament podrobno spremlja politične razmere v Ukrajini od začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, sklenjenega med EU in to državo 1. marca 1998.
Since the entry into force on 1 March 1998 of the partnership and cooperation agreement between the EU and Ukraine, the European Parliament has been closely following the political situation in the country.
Znotraj parlamentarnega odbora za sodelovanje, ustanovljenega za nadzor nad izvajanjem tega sporazuma, so evropski poslanci vedno pripravljeni na krepitev dvostranskih povezav z Ukrajino.
Within the framework of a Parliamentary Cooperation Committee set up to ensure implementation of the agreement, MEPs have worked to forge closer bilateral ties with Ukraine.
Ob obisku delegacije evroposlancev v Kijevu septembra 2003 je predsednik Kučma Evropski parlament povabil, da opazuje predsedniške volitve naslednje leto.
During the visit of an EP delegation to Kiev in September 2003, President Kuchma invited the European Parliament to send observers to the presidential election due to take place the following year.
Parlament je poslal opazovalce že na parlamentarnih volitvah leta 2002.
Parliament had already sent monitors to the parliamentary elections of 2002.
Predsedniške volitve leta 2004 so bile v Ukrajini ter pri evropskih in ameriških opazovalcih obravnavane kot odločilni preobrat v političnem razvoju države.
The 2004 presidential election was regarded both in Ukraine and by European and American observers as a decisive turning point in the country’s political development.
Vendar je komaj tri dni pred prvim krogom volitev Evropski parlament v resoluciji z dne 28. oktobra 2004 obžaloval vedno bolj napeto ozračje zaradi kampanje, vpletenosti uprave in medijev v korist Viktorja Janukoviča, predsednika vlade, in v škodo voditelju opozicije, Viktorju Juščenku.
But barely three days before the first round of the presidential elections, in a resolution adopted on 28 October 2004, the European Parliament was deploring the increasingly tense atmosphere of the election campaign and the involvement of the administration and the media on the side of Victor Yanukovych, the outgoing Prime Minister, to the detriment of the leader of the opposition, Viktor Yushchenko.
Parlament je ukrajinske oblasti pozval, naj „ustavijo kršitve demokratičnega postopka“ .
Parliament also urged the Ukrainian authorities ‘ to put an end to the ongoing violations of democratic procedures’ .
Pod predsedstvom Mareka SIWIECA, poljskega poslanca in člana socialistične skupine, je delegacija ugotovila, da so kampanjo zaznamovale skrb zbujajoče nepravilnosti: uporaba javnih sredstev kandidata Janukoviča, omejena svoboda gibanja za druge kandidate, kampanja z naklonjenostjo v medijih.
Under Mr Siwiec, a Polish member of the Socialist Group, the delegation concluded that the campaign had been marred by worrying factors such as the use of state funds by Mr Yanukovych, restrictions on the free movement of other candidates and campaign bias in the media.
Pred dokončnim mnenjem so evropski opazovalci želeli prisostvovati drugemu krogu, načrtovanemu za 21. november, ki bi lahko potekal v veliko bolj zapletenih razmerah.
The European observers reserved judgment until the second round, scheduled for 21 November, which seemed likely to take place in far more sensitive circumstances.
Ozračje kampanje se je pravzaprav precej poslabšalo med obema krogoma, zlasti po domnevah o velikih goljufijah.
The atmosphere of the campaign in fact deteriorated considerably between the two rounds, particularly as widespread fraud had been suspected.
V drugem krogu so poslanci, predvsem na ravni okrajnih volilnih komisij, lahko ugotovili pomanjkanje preglednosti in nadzora.
On the day of the second round MEPs noted the lack of transparency and verification of the democratic process, particularly by the Territorial Electoral Commissions.
Vendar je osrednja volilna komisija objavila delne izide v nasprotju s to analizo.
But the Central Electoral Commission was giving initial results that went the other way.
Evropski opazovalci in njihovi kolegi iz drugih držav so obsodili te nerealne delne izide, ki so dopuščali sum o velikih goljufijah in nepravilnostih.
The European observers, like their counterparts from other countries, judged these preliminary results to be unrealistic and became suspicious of fraud and large-scale irregularities
„Bomba“ v obliki resolucije
EP resolution described as a ‘bombshell’
Na plenarnem zasedanju 2. decembra je Evropski parlament sprejel novo resolucijo, v kateri „strogo obsoja pogoje, v katerih je bil izveden drugi krog predsedniških volitev,“ in izrazil „solidarnost z ukrajinskim ljudstvom“ , ki je pokazalo neodobravanje z nekaj sto tisoč ljudmi na ulicah.
On 2 December, at a plenary session, the European Parliament adopted a fresh resolution in which it said ‘ it strongly condemns the conditions under which the second round of the presidential elections in Ukraine have taken place ’ and ‘ expresses its solidarity with the Ukrainian people ’, who were by now showing their disapproval by demonstrating in hundreds of thousands in the streets.
Pozvali so ukrajinske oblasti, da „razveljavijo drugi krog predsedniških volitev in še pred koncem leta pripravijo nov krog“ .
They called on the Ukrainian authorities ‘ to annul the second round of the presidential elections and reorganise this second round before the end of this year ’.
Politično rešitev so našli 8. decembra.
A political solution was reached on 8 December.
Veseli me, da je bilo uslišano.“
I am delighted that they have been heard. ’
Novi, drugi krog volitev je bil organiziran 26. decembra.
A re-run of the second round was arranged for 26 December.
Tokrat so evropski opazovalci potrdili, da je bilo glasovanje svobodno in pregledno, da je potekalo v miroljubnem ozračju in prineslo prepričljivo zmago g.
The EP monitoring mission concluded that this time the elections had been free and fair, in accordance with international standards, and that they had taken place in a peaceful atmosphere.
13. januarja je Parlament v Strasbourgu množično glasoval (467 glasov za, 19 proti in 7 vzdržanih) o tretji resoluciji, ki pozdravlja končno „pravične volitve z dne 26. decembra 2004“, kar po mnenju poslancev predstavlja „zmago demokratičnih vrednot, institucij in postopkov v Ukrajini“ .
On 13 January this year, the European Parliament voted overwhelmingly in Strasbourg (467 votes in favour, 19 against and 7 abstentions) for a third resolution which was finally able to welcome ‘ the substantially fair elections held on 26 December 2004 ’, which according to MEPs represented ‘ a victory for democratic values, institutions and procedures in Ukraine ’.
Tri začasne delegacije na terenu, tri sprejete resolucije in osebno zavzemanje mnogih poslancev kažejo na pomen, ki ga je Evropski parlament pripisal zadnjim predsedniškim volitvam v Ukrajini.
The importance that the European Parliament attaches to the recent presidential election in Ukraine is illustrated by its sending of three ad hoc delegations and adopting three parliamentary resolutions, as well as by the personal commitment of many MEPs.
Poslanci so veliko storili za pomiritev politične krize, ki je zaznamovala volitve, in za spoštovanje demokratičnih načel.
The MEPs worked hard to help resolve the political crisis and to ensure that democratic standards were observed.
Odnosi Ukrajine z Unijo so sedaj vpisani v „Evropsko sosedsko politiko“, ki jo je maja 2004, takoj po širitvi z desetimi novimi državami članicami, vzpostavila Evropska komisija.
Relations between Ukraine and the EU are currently governed by the ‘European neighbourhood policy’ put forward by the European Commission in May 2004, just after the EU took in 10 new Member States.
Ta politika določa splošni okvir, v katerem morajo biti posebni akcijski načrti določeni in izvedeni za vsako „novo sosedo“ Unije.
This policy establishes a general framework within which specific action plans are to be drawn up and implemented for each of the EU’s ‘new neighbours’.
9. decembra 2004 je Komisija sprejela akcijske načrte za sedem držav, med katerimi je tudi Ukrajina.
On 9 December 2004, the Commission adopted action plans for seven countries, including Ukraine.
Za operativnost načrta ga mora še enkrat uradno potrditi odbor za dvostransko sodelovanje.
Ukraine’s plan still has to be ratified by the bilateral Cooperation Council before it becomes operational.
Ne gre za ponujanje perspektive pridružitve, ampak za napredno združevanje nekaterih politik Unije (izobraževanje, raziskovanje, okolje ...) za izboljšanje sodelovanja v boju proti kriminalu, pri upravljanju mej in gibanja prebivalstva in tudi za postopno prilagoditev nacionalnih zakonodaj, da bi na sosedske države razširili koristi notranjega trga.
The aim of the plans is to hold out the prospect, not of membership but of gradual integration into certain EU policies (e.g. education, research, environment), to improve cooperation in fighting crime and in managing borders and population movements, and also to bring national laws gradually into line so that these countries can enjoy the benefits of the internal market.
Evropski parlament v nizu nedavnih resolucij o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki ter o človekovih pravicah, zlasti z dne 14. in 28. aprila 2005, poziva EU k vodenju bolj ambiciozne sosedske politike, v skladu z „globalnimi željami Unije“ , da bi „dosegli pravičnejše ravnovesje med različnimi regijami“ in se izognili „vsaki hladni gesti zmanjšujočega interesa EU za napredek na Zahodnem Balkanu, v Ukrajini in na južnem Kavkazu“ .
But, in a series of recent resolutions on the common foreign and security policy and human rights, notably those of 14 and 28 April 2005, the European Parliament invited the EU to adopt a more ambitious neighbourhood policy, ‘ in accordance with the global ambitions of the Union ’, ‘ so that a fairer balance between the different regions can be achieved ’ and to ‘ avoid any cool gesture of diminished interest on the part of the EU for progress in the western Balkans, Ukraine and the southern Caucasus, at least ’.
Poslanci poudarjajo tudi, da je „uvedba varnosti v sosednje države Unije namenjena /.../ kljubovanju regionalnim nevarnostim“ .
MEPs stressed that ‘ the establishment of security in the Union’s neighbourhood will serve /…/ to counter threats of a regional nature ’.
Vztrajajo pri potrebi po političnem, tržnem in gospodarskem sodelovanju EU in ugotavljajo, da morajo socialno-ekonomske reforme temeljiti na „sprejetju politik za spodbujanje človekovih pravic in demokratičnih načel“ .
They underlined the need for political, commercial and economic interactions with the EU, and recognised that the process of economic and social reform necessitates as its basis ‘the adoption of policies promoting human rights and democratic standards’.
Evropski parlament v okviru finančne perspektive 2006–2013 preučuje nov instrument „sosedstva in partnerstva“, ki ga je predlagal odbor.
In the context of the Financial Perspectives for 2006-2013, the European Parliament is studying a new ‘Neighbourhood and Partnership’ Instrument proposed by the Commission.
Podpirati mora reforme v sosednjih državah EU, zlasti tistih na vzhodu Evrope.
This is intended to support the reforms in the EU’s neighbouring countries, notably those to the east of Europe.
Zadnja širitev je ob spremembi geopolitičnih podatkov nedvomno prispevala k rasti zanimanja Parlamenta za post-sovjetski prostor.
By changing the geopolitical realities, the latest enlargement has undoubtedly contributed to Parliament’s growing interest in the post-Soviet zone.
Stališča glede Moldavije ali Gruzije (kjer se je eno leto pred „oranžno revolucijo“ v Ukrajini odvila „revolucija vrtnic“) kažejo na takšno usmeritev.
Its stances on Moldova and Georgia (which had its own ‘Rose Revolution’ a year before the ‘Orange Revolution’ in Ukraine) reflect this orientation.
Parlament je še posebej zaskrbljen zaradi razmer v Belorusiji.
Parliament is particularly concerned about the situation in Belarus.
Unija in Belorusija sta leta 1995 podpisali sporazum, vendar je ostal nedokončan in noben odbor za sodelovanje ga ni predložil Evropskemu parlamentu in parlamentu Belorusije.
The EU and Belarus signed an agreement in 1995 but it has come to nothing, and no cooperation committee has been set up between the European Parliament and that of Belarus.
Stiki med režimom predsednika Lukašenka in Evropsko unijo so, odkar je nadomestil izvoljeni parlament na neposrednih volitvah leta 1996 z državnim zborom, ki ga je imenoval sam, zelo omejeni.
Since President Lukashenko replaced the parliament directly elected in 1996 with a national assembly appointed by himself, contacts between his regime and the EU have been very limited.
Kljub temu si Evropski parlament prizadeva ohraniti politične stike z demokratičnimi beloruskimi silami.
However, the European Parliament is endeavouring to maintain political contacts with the forces of Belarusian democracy.
Julija 2005 so bili poslanci zaskrbljeni zaradi poslabšanja razmer v tej državi, še zlasti v zvezi s svobodo medijev.
In July 2005, MEPs expressed their concern at the deteriorating situation in the country, especially as regards freedom of the media.
Od Sveta in Komisije so zahtevali, da podpreta vzpostavitev neodvisnega radia iz Poljske in Litve ter mogoče tudi iz Ukrajine proti Belorusiji.
They called on the Council and the Commission to support the creation of an independent radio network broadcasting to Belarus from Poland and Lithuania and possibly Ukraine.
To kaže na posebno stališče te države v odnosih z EU.
This demonstrates Ukraine’s special position in relations with the EU.
Poleg tega so poslanci v resoluciji z dne 28. oktobra 2004 priznali pomembnost Ukrajine „kot ključnega soseda in strateškega partnerja z globokimi zgodovinskimi, kulturnimi in ekonomskimi povezavami z državami članicami EU“ .
Furthermore, in their resolution of 28 October 2004, MEPs recognised the importance of Ukraine as a ‘ key neighbour and strategic partner with deep historical, cultural and economic links to the Member States of the EU ’.
Perspektiva pridružitve?
A prospect of membership?
V resoluciji o novi sosedski politiki Unije, široko sprejeti 20. novembra 2003, je Parlament že ocenil, „da ta politika razširjene Evrope – sosedska (...) – ni v nasprotju s težnjami nekaterih sosednjih evropskih držav, ki se bodo pridružile EU ali imajo različne pogodbene odnose“ .
In a resolution on the EU’s new neighbourhood policy, which was adopted by a large majority on 20 November 2003, Parliament was already expressing the view ‘ that the Wider Europe - Neighbourhood policy is in no way incompatible with certain European neighbouring countries’ aspirations to EU membership or different contractual relations .’
Predvsem je Parlament sprejel „željo po pridružitvi EU, ki jo je pokazala ta država, in tudi pobude Sveta in Komisije, da bi izdelali akcijski načrt za Ukrajino“ .
MEPs added that Parliament ‘ supports Ukraine’s desire for EU integration and the Council’s and the Commission’s current focusing on preparing an action plan for Ukraine ’.
Toda veliko odgovornih Ukrajincev meni, da je akcijski načrt brez perspektive o pridružitvi manj privlačen.
Many Ukrainian leaders, however, believe that the lack of any prospect of EU membership reduces the attraction of the action plan.
Naše mesto je v Evropski uniji.
Our place is in the European Union.
Moj cilj je Ukrajina v združeni Evropi.“ Glede tega se g.
My goal is a Ukraine in a united Europe .’
Juščenko ne razlikuje od svojega predhodnika.
On this point, Mr Yushchenko’s position is no different from that of his predecessor.
Predsednik Kučma je ob poteku vrha EU – Ukrajina 7. oktobra 2003 na Jalti, medtem ko so odgovorni v Uniji poudarjali, da je nova sosedska politika jasno različna od možne pridružitve, na primer povedal, da je dolgoročen strateški cilj njegove države pridružitev Uniji popolnoma in v celoti.
For example, on 7 October 2003, at the EU-Ukraine summit in Yalta, whereas EU leaders emphasised that the new neighbourhood policy did not necessarily entail ultimate membership of the EU, President Kuchma said that the long-term strategic goal of his country was full and complete integration into the European Union.
V različnih resolucijah poslanci vse jasneje priznavajo evropsko težnjo Ukrajine.
Between one resolution and the other, MEPs have increasingly come to recognise Ukraine’s European aspirations.
Če Parlament ne izloči perspektive o pravočasni pridružitvi Ukrajine, bo vedno vztrajal pri potrebi, da ta država spoštuje politična merila iz Kopenhagna, ki vključujejo svobodne in pregledne volitve.
Although the European Parliament does not rule out the idea of Ukraine one day joining the EU, it has always stressed the need for the country to meet the Copenhagen political criteria, which include holding free and fair elections.
S tega stališča in glede na besedilo resolucije, izglasovane tri dni pred prvim krogom predsedniških volitev, so zadnje predsedniške volitve „nedvoumen preizkus pripravljenosti ukrajinskih oblasti, da se zavežejo izvajati Evropske vrednote in standarde“ .
From this point of view, in a resolution adopted three days before the first round of the presidential elections, the EP said the election would ‘ provide an unambiguous test of the extent of the Ukrainian authorities’ commitment to implementing common European values and standards ’.
Ob vprašanju poslancev Odbora za zunanje zadeve 25. januarja je komisarka za zunanje odnose in sosedsko politiko ga.
When questioned on 25 January by members of the EP Foreign Affairs Committee, Benita Ferrero-Waldner, Commissioner for External Relations and Neighbourhood Policy, said that the European Union ‘ which has already just digested 10 new countries ’ must be ‘ pragmatic ’.
Benita Ferrero-Waldner izjavila, da mora biti Unija „ki je že prenesla deset novih držav, pragmatična“ .
She went on ‘ it would be a pity to drop the neighbourhood policy just as it has been set up’ .
Po njenem mnenju „je škoda zavrniti sosedsko politiko, če je primerna za izvajanje“ .
The Commissioner acknowledged that any European country which meets the ‘Copenhagen criteria’ is entitled to apply for membership.
Komisarka je priznala, da lahko vsaka evropska država, ki izpolnjuje merila „iz Kopenhagna“, zahteva pridružitev. „Vendar , po njenem mnenju, obstaja merilo, ki ga je treba upoštevati: sposobnost združevanja Evropske unije.“
‘ But there is one criterion which must not be forgotten ’, she said: ‘ the European Union’s absorption capacity ’.
V resoluciji z dne 13. januarja 2005 Parlament „poziva novo ukrajinsko politično vodstvo, da s pomočjo novih ukrepov za spodbujanje demokracije, civilne družbe in pravne države z nadaljevanjem reform prostega trga in premostitve političnih razhajanj v državi utrdi zavzemanje Ukrajine za skupne evropske vrednote in cilje“ .
In its resolution of 13 January 2005, the European Parliament ‘ calls upon the new Ukrainian political leadership to consolidate Ukraine’s espousal of common European values and objectives by taking further steps to promote democracy, civil society and the rule of law, by resuming the liberal market reforms and by overcoming the political divisions in Ukraine ’.
Parlament je obljubil „ukrajinskemu ljudstvu svojo podporo, pomoč in obvezanost pri vzpostavitvi svobodnega in odprtega demokratičnega sistema, oblikovanju uspešnega tržnega gospodarstva in ustrezni umestitvi države v skupnost demokratičnih narodov“ .
Parliament also pledged ‘ its continuing support, assistance and commitment to the Ukrainian people’s establishment of a free and open democratic system, their creation of a prosperous market economy and their country’s assumption of its rightful place in the community of democratic nations ’.
Parlament je zadovoljen z namero Sveta o čimprejšnjem organiziranju srečanja odbora za sodelovanje EU – Ukrajina, da bi čim hitreje sprejeli akcijski načrt EU – Ukrajina.
In addition, MEPs welcomed the Council’s intention to organise an early EU-Ukraine Cooperation Council with a view to the swift adoption of the EU-Ukraine Action Plan.
Predvsem so poslanci pozvali „Svet, Komisijo in države članice, da poleg ukrepov akcijskega načrta v okviru evropske sosedske politike razmislijo o drugih oblikah povezovanja z Ukrajino in ji ponudijo jasno evropsko perspektivo ter se odzovejo na izkazana prizadevanja večine ukrajinskega prebivalstva, ki bi morebiti vodila do končne pridružitve države k Evropski uniji“.
And, above all, MEPs called on ‘ the Council, the Commission and the Member States to consider, besides the measures of the Action Plan within the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy, other forms of association with Ukraine, giving a clear European perspective for the country and responding to the demonstrated aspirations of the vast majority of the Ukrainian people, possibly leading ultimately to the country’s accession to the EU ’.