natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kakšna je strategija Komisije, da bi spodbudila tesnejše sodelovanje držav članic pri vprašanjih javnih naročil za obrambo ter izboljšala preglednost in postopno odprla nacionalne trge na tem področju, da se tako vzpostavi uspešno in konkurenčno okolje za ta občutljivi sektor?
What is the Commission's strategy to induce Member States to cooperate more closely on defence procurement issues and to improve transparency and gradually open up their national defence procurement markets, in order to establish a productive and competitive environment for this sensitive sector?
Kaj je mogoče sklepati na podlagi kodeksa ravnanja, oblikovanega leta 2006?
What conclusions can be drawn from the Code of Conduct that was established in 2006?
Kako si Komisija predstavlja prihodnje razmerje med direktivo in kodeksom ravnanja?
How does the Commission understand the future relationship between a directive and the Code of Conduct?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0023/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0023/07
Zadeva: Dajatve za avtorske pravice
Subject: Copyright levies
Komisar McCreevy je 21. novembra 2006 v govoru pred Odborom za pravne zadeve dejal, da naj bi Komisija kmalu predlagala pobudo o dajatvah za avtorske pravice.
On 21 November 2006 Commissioner McCreevy stated in his address to the Legal Affairs Committee that 'the Commission will shortly bring forward an initiative on copyright levies. ...
Izrazil je zaskrbljenost, kajti delovanje nekaterih sistemov nadomestil morebiti ovira trgovino na notranjem trgu.
[W]e are concerned that the operation of some fair compensation schemes may be disrupting trade in the internal market.
Komisija se sprašuje, ali so potrošniki deležni pravične obravnave, tako kot bi morali biti, in ali se v celoti upošteva vse pogostejša uporaba tehnoloških sredstev za varovanje z avtorsko pravico zaščitenih del.
We also wonder whether consumers are getting as fair a deal as they should, and whether full account is being taken of the increased use of technological means to protect copyright protected works.
Poleg tega Komisija meni, da sta večja jasnost in odgovornost pri delovanju sistemov v korist vseh zainteresiranih strani.
We also feel that greater clarity and accountability in how schemes operate is in the best interests of all stakeholders.'
Predsednik Barroso je manj kot mesec dni kasneje izjavil, da je bila predlagana pobuda oziroma priporočilo umaknjeno.
Within less than one month, President Barroso stated that the proposed initiative - a recommendation - had been withdrawn.
Glede na očitno politično občutljivost zadeve, ali Komisija ne meni, da bi bilo bolje predlagati zakonodajo v okviru postopka soodločanja, v katerem lahko demokratične institucije izrazijo svoje mnenje, kot uporabiti nezavezujoč pravni instrument, katerega učinkovitost in legalnost sta sporni in ki je brez vsake demokratične legitimnosti?
In view of the manifest political sensitivity of this matter, does the Commission not consider that it would be better advised to propose legislation under the codecision procedure in which the democratic institutions can have their say, rather than a soft-law instrument of dubious efficacy and legality without any democratic legitimation?
Če bi Komisija ukrepala na tem področju,
In the event that the Commission were to act in this area,
ali bi dopustila možnost, da dajatve zajamejo vse vrste opreme/strojev itd., ki se lahko zaščitijo z avtorsko pravico?
Would it be permissible for levies to cover every sort of equipment/machines, etc which can be used for copying?
kako bi se Komisija odzvala v primeru držav članic, kjer dajatve ne pripadajo dejanskemu imetniku avtorske pravice, temveč se denar porabi za financiranje splošne kulturne politike in programov?
How would the Commission react to Member States where levies do not accrue to the actual rights holders but instead the money is used for financing general cultural policy and programmes?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0024/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0024/07
Kakovost podatkov, ki jih države članice posredujejo Eurostatu, je ključnega pomena za pravilno delovanje Evropske unije, zlasti za monetarno unijo in sistem proračunskega nadzora, pa tudi za konvergenčna merila pri ocenjevanju morebitne širitve euroobmočja.
The quality of data transmitted by Member States to Eurostat is vital for the correct functioning of the European Union, especially for Monetary Union and its budgetary surveillance system as well as the convergence criteria when evaluating possible enlargements of the euro area.
Ali je prepričana, da so podatki, ki jih prejema, v splošnem kakovostni?
Is the Commission confident enough about the overall quality of data it receives?
Kako preverja verodostojnost prejetih podatkov?
How does the Commission check the plausibility of data received?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0025/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0025/07
Zadeva: O izvajanju direktive 94/45/ES o ustanovitvi Evropskega sveta delavcev
Subject: Implementation of Directive 94/45/EC on the European enterprise committee
Po sprejetju direktive 94/45/ES o ustanovitvi Evropskega sveta delavcev leta 1994, je Komisija leta 2000 oblikovala poročilo, v katerem je preučila izvajanje direktive, kot predvideva njen člen 15.
Following the adoption in 1994 of Directive 94/45/EC on the European enterprise committee, the Commission drew up a report in 2000 which examined its implementation, as provided for in Article 15 of the text.
Med tem pregledom se je osredotočila le na izvajanje direktive in ni podala zaključkov ali priporočila sprememb.
In this report, the Commission confined itself to the implementation aspect, without drawing any conclusions or recommending any changes.
Po poročilu Komisije je Parlament septembra 2001 sprejel resolucijo ( A5-0282/2001 ), v kateri je zahteval spremembo direktive in opomin vsem državam članicam, ki so direktivo kršile.
In the wake of the Commission's report, in September 2001 Parliament adopted a resolution ( A5-0282/2001 ) in which it called for a modification of the directive and for any Member State in breach of it to be issued a warning.
Komisija ni glede tega storila ničesar.
The Commission did not react.
Zakaj Komisija kljub zgoraj omenjeni resoluciji Parlamenta ni sprejela nobenega ukrepa za izvajanje direktive?
Can the Commission explain why it has taken no action on the implementation of this directive, despite the above resolution of Parliament?
Nujno je treba preučiti večanje neizvajanja direktive v preteklih letih.
It is vitally important to examine the many cases of non-application of the directive in the last few years.
Kakšna je ocena Komisije glede izvajanja direktive o Evropskem svetu delavcev?
What is the Commission's evaluation of the implementation of the European enterprise committee?
Ali obstajajo države članice, ki direktive še vedno ne izvajajo?
Are there Member States which have still not implemented it?
Ali jim Komisija namerava izreči opomine?
Will the Commission issue the necessary warnings?
Na kakšen način namerava Komisija pravilno izvajati direktivo?
How does the Commission intend to apply the directive in practical terms?
Ali meni, da je treba direktivo spremeniti?
Does the Commission believe it should be modified?
UL C 72 E, 21.3.2002, str.
64 OJ C 72 E, 21.3.2002, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0026/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0026/07
Zadeva: Pomoč kmetom, ki jih je prizadela pozeba
Subject: Aid for farmers affected by frost damage
Kmetje položaj opisujejo kot najhujši v zadnjih desetletjih.
Farmers are describing the crisis as the worst for decades.
Števili pridelovalci letos ne bodo pridelali niti kilograma jabolk, češenj ali drugega sadja, kar bo povzročilo višje cene na domačem trgu ter izgubo številnih drugih trgov, na katerih so poljski kmetje več let uspešno prodajali.
Many fruit growers will not harvest even a single kilo of apples, cherries or other fruit this year, leading to higher prices on the national market, as well as the loss of many overseas markets, where Polish producers have been successfully selling their produce for many years.
Poljska vlada je kmetom obljubila pomoč v obliki odlogov za poplačilo posojil, novih izrednih posojil in davčnih olajšav.
The Polish Government has promised assistance to farmers in the form of deferred repayment of loans, new emergency loans and relief on farm taxes.
Na žalost pa poljska vlada težav pridelovalcev sadja in zelenjave, ki se soočajo s finančnim propadom, sama ni sposobna rešiti.
Unfortunately, the Polish Government on its own is not in a position to resolve the problem of fruit and vegetable growers faced with bankruptcy.
Zaradi omenjenega se Komisijo sprašuje, kakšno pomoč namerava zagotoviti poljskim pridelovalcem sadja in zelenjave?
In the light of the above, what assistance does the Commission intend to provide for Polish fruit and vegetable producers?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0027/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0027/07
Zadeva: Kodeks najboljše prakse za multiplo sklerozo
Subject: Multiple Sclerosis Code of Best Practice
Na podlagi peticije št. 0842/2001, ki jo je predložila Louise McVay, je Evropski parlament decembra 2003 z veliko večino podprl poročilo A5-0451/2003 in priloženo resolucijo, ki ju je vložil Odbor za peticije v zvezi z ukrepi za pomoč evropskim državljanom z multiplo sklerozo .
On the basis of the petition No 0842/2001 submitted by Louise McVay, the European Parliament overwhelmingly approved in December 2003 a report A5-0451/2003 and accompanying resolution submitted by the Committee on Petitions concerning measures to assist European citizens with multiple sclerosis .
Na podlagi resolucije in v sodelovanju z združenji multiple skleroze v državah članicah ter z evropsko platformo multiple skleroze je bil izdelan kodeks najboljše prakse, ki je bil predložen institucijam EU.
On the basis of the resolution and in cooperation with Multiple Sclerosis Societies the Member States and the European Multiple Sclerosis Platform, a Code of Best Practice has been prepared and submitted to the EU institutions.
Ali lahko Svet navede, katere posebne ukrepe je sprejel za izvajanje omenjene resolucije in zlasti kodeksa najboljše prakse?
Would the Council indicate the specific measures which it has have taken to implement this resolution and, in particular, the Code of Best Practice?
UL C 91 E, 15.4.2004, str.
OJ C 91 E, 15.4.2004, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0028/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0028/07
Na podlagi resolucije in v sodelovanju z združenji multiple skleroze v državah članicah ter z evropsko platformo multiple skleroze je bil izdelan kodeks najboljše prakse, ki je bil predložen institucijam EU.
On the basis of the resolution and in cooperation with Multiple Sclerosis Societies in the Member States and the European Multiple Sclerosis Platform, a Code of Best Practice has been prepared and submitted to the EU institutions.
Ali lahko Komisija navede, katere posebne ukrepe je sprejela za izvajanje omenjene resolucije in zlasti kodeksa najboljše prakse?
Would the Commission indicate the specific measures which it has taken to implement this resolution and, in particular, the Code of Best Practice?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0029/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0029/07
Zadeva: Razširjenost astme v Evropski uniji
Subject: Prevalence of asthma in the European Union
Zbolevnost za astmo v Evropski uniji vse bolj narašča, zato bi bilo treba to bolezen obravnavati kot težavo na področju javnega zdravja.
The incidence of asthma continues to increase across the European Union, to the extent that asthma should be regarded as a public health concern.
Nedavna konferenca Evropskega parlamenta o astmi je pokazala, da smernice o kliničnih preiskavah zdravil za zdravljenje astme Evropske agencije za zdravila niso bile posodobljene od leta 2002 in slonijo na zastarelem medicinskem pogledu na astmo, ki ne upošteva sistemske narave te bolezni, to pa je v škodo bolnikov v vsej Evropski uniji.
A recent conference in the European Parliament on asthma revealed that the EMEA ‘Guidance Note on the Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Asthma’ has not been updated since 2002 and relies on an outdated medical view on asthma which does not capture the systemic nature of the disease.
Ali in kako je generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov uporabil ugotovitve evropske mreže odličnosti iz alergologije, ustanovljene v okviru šestega raziskovalnega programa, ter jih posredoval državam članicam in vsem ustreznim akterjem na področju?
To what extent have the findings by GA2LEN, established under the 6th Research Framework Programme, been incorporated by DG SANCO and communicated to Member States and all relevant actors in the field?
Je generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov v rednem stiku z generalnim direktoratom za okolje, da se zagotovi, da se ugotovitve v zvezi z astmo vključi v politike in pobude generalnega direktorata o tobaku, kakovosti zraka v zaprtih prostorih in emisijah?
Is DG SANCO in regular contact with DG Environment to ensure that findings on asthma are incorporated in the DG’s policies and initiatives on tobacco, indoor air quality and emissions?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0030/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0030/07
Zadeva: Misija za ugotavljanje dejstev v pokrajinah Andaluzija, Valencia in Madrid
Subject: Fact-finding mission to the regions of Andalusia, Valencia and Madrid
11. aprila je Odbor za peticije odobril poročilo (PE 386.549) o misiji za ugotavljanje dejstev v pokrajinah Andaluzija, Valencia in Madrid, kar zadeva obsežne urbanistične projekte v teh španskih avtonomnih pokrajinah, o katerih je bilo prejeto veliko peticij.
On 11 April, the Petitions Committee approved a report (PE 386.549) which resulted from a fact-finding mission to the regions of Andalusia, Valencia and Madrid concerning the extensive urbanisation projects in these autonomous regions of Spain about which many petitions have been received.
Poročilo je bilo zelo kritično do dejstva, da se s temi obsežnimi urbanističnimi razvojnimi načrti brezobzirno spodkopava osnovna pravica tisočev evropskih državljanov do njihove zakonito pridobljene posesti.
The report was strongly critical of the fact that the basic rights of thousands of European citizens to their legitimately acquired property are being severely undermined by these massive urban development programmes.
Ker postopki niso pregledni, se ne izpolnjujejo evropske direktive o javnih naročilih, ogrožena je oskrba z vodo in izpolnjevanje evropskih direktiv o ravnanju z njo, pogosto pa se tudi ne upoštevajo direktive o zaščiti okolja in biotske raznovrstnosti.
Furthermore, due to lack of transparent procedures, European directives on public procurement are not complied with, water supply and compliance with European directives on water management are threatened, and the directives on the protection of the environment and biodiversity are frequently being ignored.
Parlament je 13. decembra 2005 z veliko večino sprejel resolucijo o tem vprašanju v zvezi s pokrajino Valencia, kjer se pojavljajo najhujši primeri.
Parliament itself approved a resolution on this issue on 13 December 2005 by an overwhelming majority, concerning the Valencian region where the most serious cases are occurring.
Tako poročilo misije za ugotavljanje dejstev kot resolucija Parlamenta sta bili posredovani predsedstvu Sveta in Evropski komisiji.
Both the report of the fact-finding visit and the resolution of Parliament have been transmitted to the Council Presidency and the European Commission.
Katere ukrepe je sprejelo predsedstvo Sveta za zagotovitev pravilne uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti in spoštovanja temeljnih pravic evropskih državljanov, kot je določeno v členu 6 pogodbe o Evropski uniji?
What actions are being taken by the Council Presidency to ensure the correct application of Community law and respect for the fundamental rights of European citizens, as contained in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0031/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0031/07
Zadeva: Misija za ugotavljanje dejstev v pokrajinah Andaluzija, Valencia in Madrid
Subject: Fact-finding mission to the regions of Andalusía, Valencia and Madrid
Katere ukrepe je sprejela Komisija za zagotovitev pravilne uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti in spoštovanja temeljnih pravic evropskih državljanov, kot je določeno v členu 6 pogodbe o Evropski uniji?
What actions are being taken by the Commission to ensure the correct application of Community law and respect for the fundamental rights of European citizens, as contained in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0032/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0032/07
Zadeva: Najnovejši razvoj v dvostranskih odnosih s Kitajsko
Subject: Recent developments in bilateral trade relations with China
Leta 2006 je Ljudska republika Kitajska izrinila Združene države z mesta največjega vira uvoza EU, medtem ko je trgovinski primanjkljaj EU s Kitajsko narasel na 128 milijard EUR.
In 2006 the People’s Republic of China displaced the United States to become the largest source of EU imports, while the EU’s trade deficit with China grew to €128 billion.
Januarja 2007 so se začela pogajanja o novem sporazumu za partnerstvo in sodelovanje, Komisija pa je mesec zatem objavila raziskavo z ugotovitvami, da obstaja veliko možnosti za evropske izvoznike ekoloških izdelkov, poslovnih storitev in visokokakovostnih izdelkov.
In January 2007 the negotiations on a new Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) were launched and, the following month, the Commission released a study which suggested that there were major opportunities for EU exporters in green goods, business services and high-value products.
Vendar je raziskava tudi pokazala, da se izvozniki iz EU soočajo z velikimi težavami pri dostopanju do kitajskega trga in da so pravice intelektualne lastnine slabo zaščitene.
However, the study also concluded that EU exporters faced serious barriers when trying to access the Chinese market, as well as poor protection of intellectual property rights.
Ali lahko v skladu s členom 19 okvirnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo zagotovi, da se Parlament „pravočasno in jasno obvešča“ o poteku pogajanj in da se mu predvsem posreduje sprejeto direktivo, ki je predmet pogajanja?
Ensure, in accordance with Article 19 of the Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission, that ‘early and clear information’ is provided to Parliament during the conduct of the negotiations and, in particular, that the adopted negotiating directive is transmitted?
Ali lahko pojasni, s katerimi ukrepi namerava odpraviti pomanjkanje visoke stopnje zaščite človekovih pravic in ustreznih okoljskih, socialnih in varnostnih norm na Kitajskem v sklopu pogajanj o sporazumu za partnerstvo in sodelovanje in v okviru STO, ter kakšen pristop predlaga glede kitajskega izkrivljanja svetovnega trga z naravnimi viri?
Explain how it intends to address the lack of a high level of protection of human rights and of adequate environmental, social and safety standards in China within the PCA negotiations and the WTO framework, as well as its proposed approach towards Chinese distortions of the world market for trade in natural resources?
Ali lahko tudi pojasni, s katerimi ukrepi namerava izboljšati dostop izvoznikov EU na trg, kako namerava rešiti neutemeljene obtožbe (nekatere med njimi očitno izvirajo iz uradnih organov), da evropski izdelki niso skladni z varnostnimi zahtevami, in, ob upoštevanju odločitve Združenih držav, da pri STO začnejo postopek reševanja sporov o zaščiti in uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine na Kitajskem, katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti za zagotovitev, da evropska industrija zaradi ponarejanja in piratstva ne bo več utrpela velike škode?
Explain what steps it is taking to improve market access for EU exporters, how it proposes to combat unfounded allegations of safety problems with European products, some of which appear to have been instigated by official bodies, and, in the light of the US decision to initiate WTO Dispute Settlement procedures with regard to the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights in China, what measures it envisages taking to ensure that European industry does not continue to suffer widespread damage as a result of counterfeiting and piracy?
Ali lahko predloži oceno napredka Kitajske pri izpolnjevanju pogojev, ki jih je določila EU v zvezi z njeno zahtevo za status tržnega gospodarstva?
Provide an assessment of China’s progress towards the fulfilment of the conditions set by the EU in relation to its Market Economy Status request?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0034/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0034/07
Zadeva: Boj proti terorizmu
Subject: Fight against terrorism
Terorizem pomeni grožnjo za vse države in vse ljudi.
Terrorism is a threat to all states and to all people.
Poleg razvoja zgoraj navedenih instrumentov je leta 2006 Svet vzpostavil politični dialog na visoki ravni o boju proti terorizmu med glavnimi evropskimi institucijami, ki v tem boju sodelujejo, pri tem pa poudaril pomen demokratične odgovornosti.
In addition to developing the above-mentioned instruments, in 2006 the Council created the 'High Level Political Dialogue on Counter-Terrorism between the main European Institutions involved in the fight against terrorism', highlighting the importance of democratic accountability.
Vendar je kljub tem prizadevanjem EU doživela številne poskuse terorističnih napadov (čezatlantski leti iz Londona, vlaki v Nemčiji).
However, despite all these efforts, the EU has experienced a number of attempted terrorist attacks (transatlantic flights from London, trains in Germany).
Zato se postavljajo številna vprašanja:
From these facts, a number of questions arise:
Ali Svet meni, da je treba pripraviti ustrezno oceno vseh doslej sprejetih protiterorističnih ukrepov in/ali oceno njihove učinkovitosti?
Does the Council consider it necessary to carry out a proper evaluation of all counter-terrorism measures adopted until now and/or an assessment of their effectiveness?
So predvideni dodatni konkretni ukrepi?
Are there any additional, concrete measures envisaged?
Kako Svet ocenjuje in upravlja vzajemno delovanje med državami članicami in Evropsko unijo v tem okviru?
How does the Council evaluate and manage the interaction between Member States and the European Union in this context?
Ali meni, da je potrebno večje zaupanje med oblastmi EU ter organi pregona in protiterorističnimi službami držav članic?
Would the Council assume that we would need greater mutual trust between EU authorities and Member States' law enforcement and counter-terrorism services?
Če domnevamo, da je treba okrepiti vlogo EU in njenih institucij v boju proti terorizmu, kako bo Svet zagotovil tesno sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta v neposrednem formalnem političnem dialogu?
Assuming that the role of the EU and its institutions in the fight against terrorism needs to be strengthened, how will the Council ensure the close involvement of the European Parliament in a straightforward formal political dialogue?
Zakaj mesto protiterorističnega koordinatorja EU še ni zapolnjeno?
Why is the position of the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator still vacant?
Koordinator boja proti terorizmu v odnosu do situacijskega centra
Coordinator of the fight against terrorism vis-à-vis Situation Centre (SITCEN):
Ni bilo razlage, zakaj je mesto g. de Vriesa ostalo nezasedeno.
There has been no explanation for leaving the post of Mr de Vries vacant.
Gre to pripisati prekrivanju pristojnosti med koordinatorjem za boj proti terorizmu in situacijskim centrom?
Is this attributed to the overlap of competences between the Coordinator for the fight against terrorism and the Situation Centre?
Situacijski center je zadolžen za vse naloge, ki so bile prej dodeljene g. de Vriesu.
The SITCEN is in charge of all those tasks awarded previously to Mr de Vries.
Ob upoštevanju, da je teroristična grožnja še vedno aktualna, menite, da dejavnost situacijskega centra zadostuje?
Taking into account that the terrorist menace is still acute, is the work of the Situation Centre considered to be sufficient?