natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zadeva: Izmenjava podatkov o potnikih z ZDA
Subject: Exchange of passenger data records with the USA
Po opozorilih EP, da pri izmenjavi podatkov o potnikih v letalskem prometu z ZDA ne veljajo dovolj strogi varovalni ukrepi za zaščito podatkov in ob ugotovitvi, da dve leti potem, ko je EP izpostavil vprašanje, še vedno ni zadovoljive rešitve, se zdi umestno, da bi bil EP polno obveščen o trenutnem stanju pogovorov med Komisijo in organi ZDA.
Following the expression of concern by the EP that the exchange of air passenger data (PNR) with the USA is not subject to sufficiently stringent data protection safeguards and given that, two years after the EP raised this issue, no satisfactory solution has been found, it is important for the EP to be fully informed about the current situation in discussions between the Commission and the US authorities.
V kakšni fazi je vzpostavitev sistema "push", ki ga je zahteval EP?
How much progress has been made in establishing the ‘push system’ requested by the EP?
Ali so potniki, ki letijo v ZDA, pravilno obveščeni o prenosu njihovih podatkov?
Are passengers flying to the US correctly informed about the transfer of their data?
Kako to deluje v praksi v primeru letalskih družb in kako v primeru vozovnic, kupljenih preko svetovnega spleta?
How does this work in practice for all airlines and for tickets sold over the internet?
Na kakšen način in v kolikšni meri Komisija preverja, če so podatki v ZDA obravnavani skladno s sprejetimi obvezami, še zlasti kar zadeva filtriranje občutljivih podatkov?
Does the Commission have any or sufficient means of verifying compliance in the US with the data protection commitments given, with particular regard to filters on sensitive data?
Ali organi ZDA podatke obdelujejo v skladu s predpisi?
Is the processing of data by the US authorities fully in line with the rules?
Ali se na teh letnih srečanjih težave rešujejo brez posebnih zapletov?
Are problems easily solved at these annual meetings?
Ali obstajajo primeri vnosa popravkov v podatke, ki so že bili predani ZDA?
Has any of the data already transferred to the US been corrected?
Ali se je že zgodilo, da je prišlo do (naključnega) prenosa podatkov v tretje države?
Have there been any leaks or transfer of data to third countries?
Ali potekajo pogovori o CAPPS II?
Are discussions on the CAPPS II under way?
V kakšni meri bi ti pogovori lahko vplivali na potnike v notranjem evropskem prometu?
If so, to what extent could these discussions have an effect on internal European passengers?
Glede na predlagana pravila ZDA, po katerih naj bi v potne listine vključili RFID značke, in glede na zahtevo ZDA, da vseh 27 držav, katerih državljani ne potrebujejo vizuma za vstop v to državo, pripravi potne listine, opremljene za elektronsko branje, kakšna varovala bodo vzpostavljena za omejevanje možnosti poseganja v zasebnost in zagotavljanje varnosti naših državljanov?
Following the proposed new US rules that aim to insert a non-encrypted RFID chip in the new e-passport, and bearing in mind that the USA is requiring all 27 countries whose citizens do not need visas to visit America to begin issuing e-passports, what safeguards should be put in place in order to reduce the risks to privacy and security of our citizens?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0021/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0021/05
Veliko povpraševanje po nafti je vzrok vsesplošnega prizadevanja za dostop do njenih virov, to pa ima dobro znane posledice za svetovni mir in varnost.
High oil demand is exacerbating the global struggle for access to resources, with all the known negative implications for global peace and security.
Visoke in nestanovitne cene nafte pomenijo grožnjo za evropski gospodarski razvoj.
High and volatile oil prices are a threat to European economic development.
Poleg tega velika poraba nafte zlasti v transportnem sektorju predstavlja največji izziv za politike s področja podnebnih sprememb.
Furthermore, high oil consumption, above all in the transport sector, is one of the biggest challenges for climate change policies.
Navedena dejstva dokazujejo, da je omejitev odvisnosti EU od nafte v njenem splošnem interesu.
In the light of these facts, it would be in the overall interest of the EU to reduce its dependency on oil consumption.
Katere splošne ukrepe predvideva Komisija za bistveno in nujno potrebno preusmeritev njenih trenutnih politik?
Therefore, what kind of measures does the European Commission envisage in general with a view to making the considerable and necessary shift in its actual policies?
Glede na precejšnje in "nepričakovane" dobičke evropskih naftnih družb, katere pobude namerava Komisija sprejeti, da bi z njimi slednje pripravila do odgovornega ravnanje?
And, in particular in the light of the ‘windfall profits’ achieved by European oil companies, what initiatives will the Commission take to ensure that those companies assume their due responsibility?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAV O-0022/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0022/05
Na kakšen način lahko Komisija preko energetske politike zagotovi realno delovanje, ki bo poleg doseganja okoljskih ciljev hkrati pomenilo večjo konkurenčnost podjetij iz EU?
How can the Commission ensure real action through the energy policy, so that European commitment to environmental goals also translate into increased competitiveness for EU enterprises?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0023/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0023/05
Resno dvomimo v zakonitost in nujnost okvirne direktive o hrambi podatkov, ki so jo predlagale Francija, Velika Britanija, Irska in Švedska: člen 8 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah ščiti pravico do zasebnega življenja.
We seriously doubt that the draft framework decision on retention of data proposed by France, UK, Ireland and Sweden is either legal or necessary; Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to a private life.
Nekritično zbiranje prometnih podatkov krši osnovno načelo pravne države: državljani morajo biti obveščeni o pogojih, pod katerimi lahko država izvaja nadzor, da lahko prilagodijo svoje vedenje in se tako izognejo nepotrebnemu vmešavanju države.
The indiscriminate collection of traffic data offends a core principle of the rule of law, that citizens should have notice of the circumstances in which the State may conduct surveillance, so that they can regulate their behaviour to avoid unwanted intrusions.
Hramba podatkov bi bila tako obsežna, da ne bi bila v skladu s cilji, ki služijo vzdrževanju javnega reda.
Retention would be so extensive as to be out of all proportion to the law enforcement objectives served.
Sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice kaže, da v demokratičnih družbah takega nesorazmernega vmešavanja v zasebna življenja posameznikov ne potrebujemo.
Under the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, such a disproportionate interference in the private lives of individuals cannot be said to be necessary in a democratic society.
Glede na to, zahtevamo, da Komisija obvesti Parlament o naslednjem:
In this light, we ask the Commission:
ali Komisija podpira ali ne podpira predlog štirih držav članic?
Does it or does it not support the proposal from the four Member States?
v primeru, da ne podpira, ali bo Komisija zahtevala od štirih držav članic, da umaknejo predlog?
If not, will the Commission ask the four Member States to withdraw the proposal?
kdaj bo Komisija pripravila dolgo pričakovani predlog za instrument hrambe podatkov po načelih tretjega stebra?
When will the Commission put forward a proposal for the long-awaited third pillar data protection instrument?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0024/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0024/05
Zadeva: PNR - Prenos podatkov o potnikih
Subject: PNR - Transfer of passenger data
Komisija naj v luči resnih pomislekov, ki sta jih izrazila tako Parlament kot delovna skupina o PNR po členu 29 Parlament obvesti o naslednjem:
In the light of the serious concerns expressed by both Parliament and the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party on the PNR agreement:
Kaj je Komisija storila, da bi zagotovila vzpostavitev sistema "push"?
What has the Commission done to ensure the establishment of the ‘push system’?
Kako natančno Komisija zagotavlja, da zaradi tega sistema ni kršen nobeden od evropskih predpisov o varovanju podatkov?
What exactly has the Commission done to make sure that no parts of the European rules on data protection are being violated due to this system?
Koliko osumljenih teroristov in resnih zločincev je bilo odkritih po začetku delovanja tega sistema?
How many suspected terrorists or serious criminals have been identified after the entry into force of this system?
Kako je Komisija poskrbela, da so potniki v zračnem prometu ustrezno obveščeni o prenosu podatkov?
What has the Commission done in order to ensure that air passengers are being adequately informed of the data transfer?
Se Komisija z ZDA začela pogajati o sporazumu CAPPS II in o uvedbi RDFI značk v potnih listinah?
Has it started negotiating with the US on CAPPS II and on the introduction of the non-encrypted RFID chip in passports?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0025/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0025/05
, v imenu Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov
, on behalf of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
Zadeva: ameni Komisije v zvezi s predlogom Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu - KOM(2004)0002 končno
Subject: State of play in the Commission concerning the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market - COM(2004)0002 final
Glede na objave v tisku in medijska poročila o morebitni reviziji predloga direktive o storitvah na notranjem trgu s strani Komisije, ali lahko Evropska komisija:
Against a background of press and media reports of a possible revision by the European Commission of its proposal for a directive on services in the internal market; could the Commission:
razjasni svoje namene v zvezi s predlogom?
clarify its intentions on the proposal?
potrdi, da svojega predloga ne bo umaknila?
confirm that it would not withdraw its proposal?
potrdi, da s svojim delovanjem ne bo posegala v pravice Evropskega parlamenta v postopku soodločanja?
confirm that it will not proceed in a way that undermines the prerogatives of the European Parliament in the codecision procedure?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0026/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0026/05
Zadeva: Dolgoročne posledice druge svetovne vojne
Subject: Long-term consequences of the Second World War
Po drugi svetovni vojni in razdelitvi povojne Evrope na vplivna območja, ki je temeljila na dogovoru z Jalte, so nekatere države osrednje in vzhodne Evrope izgubile svojo neodvisnost.
As a consequence of World War II and of the division of post-war Europe into spheres of influence based on the Yalta agreements, some Eastern and Central Europe countries lost their independence.
Drugi narodi so padli v prevlado totalitarnih režimov pod nadzorom komunistične Rusije.
Other nations fell under the rule of totalitarian regimes controlled by Communist Russia.
Ta položaj je privedel do izgube državljanskih pravic in gospodarskega nazadovanja tega območja.
This situation led to the loss of citizens’ rights and to the economic backwardness of the region.
Katere politične, pravne in ekonomske pobude Evropske unije lahko koristijo premagovanju obstoječih razlik v razvoju in krepitvi demokracije v omenjenih državah?
What political, legal and economic initiatives of the European Union can be used to overcome the existing development disparities and to strengthen democracy in those countries?
Na kakšen način lahko EU prepreči povratek idej in političnih ukrepov, ki temeljijo na kategoriji vplivnih območij in na neupoštevanju svobodne volje narodov?
In what way can the EU prevent the return of thinking and political actions that are based on the category of spheres of influence and on disregard for the free will of nations?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0027/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0027/05
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0028/05/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0028/05/rev.1
Zadeva: Priznanje Svetovnega dneva Romov
Subject: Recognition of International Roma Day
Takšna simbolična gesta do ene največjih etničnih manjšin v Evropi je tudi apoteoza evropski kulturni raznolikosti, saj kaže njeno zavzetost v boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji ter varstvu človekovih pravic.
A symbolic gesture of this nature towards one of the largest ethnic minority groups within the EU would also celebrate Europe’s cultural variety, and demonstrate a commitment to the EU's campaign against racism and xenophobia and to the protection of human rights.
Razširjenost rasne diskriminacije Romov in njihov boj proti izključevanju iz družbe sta dobro izpričana.
The prevalence of racial discrimination and the campaign against the segregation of the Roma is well-documented.
Ali se Komisija ne strinja, da bi se s priznanjem 8. aprila kot evropskega dneva Romov povečala zavest o njihovem položaju in da bi to pomagalo pri pospeševanju politik vključevanja naših evropskih sodržavljanov?
Does not the Commission agree that recognition of 8 April as European Roma Day would raise awareness of their situation and help to play a role in furthering inclusive policies for our fellow EU citizens?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0029/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0029/05
Zadeva: Vloga in delovanje javnega zdravstva v državah članicah EU
Subject: The role and operation of the public health service in EU Member States
Zagotavljanje zdravstvene oskrbe je primarna vloga države, ki bi morala biti obvezana, da skrbi za javno zdravstvo in da zagotavlja zanj potrebna finančna sredstva.
Guaranteeing medical care is a primary role of the state, which should be obliged to maintain the public health service and fund it properly.
Zdravje ljudi je ena najpomembnejših vrednot, dostop do zdravstvenih storitev pa je osebna pravica vseh državljanov, ki temelji na njihovi udeležbi pri razvoju sistema, temelječega na socialni solidarnosti.
Public health is one of the most important values and access to health services is a personal right acquired by all citizens by virtue of their participation in the development of a system based on social solidarity.
Liberalen pristop, privatizacija in odprtje storitev trgu, ki so jih spodbudili številni pravni akti, sprejeti s strani EU, nezadostno ščitijo področja kot so preventivna medicina, varstvo matere in otroka ter zdravljenje civilizacijskih in geriatričnih bolezni, ki niso dobičkonosne, vendar pa so zelo pomembne z vidika zdravja Skupnosti.
The liberal approach, privatisation and the opening-up of services to the market encouraged by various legal acts adopted by the EU do not guarantee adequate provision in such fields as preventive medicine, mother and baby care, and treatment of civilisation and geriatric diseases, which are not profitable, but very important from the point of view of community health.
Zakaj EU kljub pomanjkanju pristojnosti za organizacijo in izvajanje zdravstvenih storitev spodbuja sprejemanje pravnih aktov, ki ogrožajo zdravje njenih državljanov?
Why, despite its lack of competence for the organisation and operation of health services, does the EU interfere by adopting legal acts which threaten the health of its citizens?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0030/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0030/05
Zadeva: Sklep Združenih narodov na področju, ki ostaja izven pristojnosti Skupnosti
Subject: Decisions taken at the UN in an area that remains outside the Community's competence
Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov je 6. decembra 2004 sprejela resolucijo o "Praznovanju desete obletnice mednarodnega leta družine" (dokument A/59/L.29).
The resolution on ‘Celebrating the Tenth Anniversary of the International Year of the Family’ (document A/59/L.29) was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 6 December 2004.
Države, kot na primer Poljska in Italija, sto hotele podpreti besedilo, vendar jim je enoten položaj EU to preprečil, čeprav to področje ostaja izven pristojnosti Skupnosti.
Countries such as Poland and Italy wanted to support the text, but a single EU stance prevented them from doing so, even though this area remains outside the Community's competence.
Na podlagi česa je predstavnik nizozemskega predsedstva Peter-Derrick Hof izjavil, da "Evropska unija zavrača besedilo deklaracije", ki so jo podprle nekatere države članice in ki jo je sprejela generalna skupščina Združenih narodov?
On what authority did Peter-Derrick Hof, representing the Dutch Presidency, declare that ‘the European Union would, therefore, disassociate itself from the text of the declaration’ which was supported by some Member States and adopted by the UN General Assembly?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0031/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0031/05
Zadeva: Sklep Združenih narodov na področju, ki ostaja izven pristojnosti Skupnosti
Subject: Decision taken at the UN in an area that remains outside the Community's competence
Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov je sprejela resolucijo o "Praznovanju desete obletnice mednarodnega leta družine" (dokument A/59/L.29) 6. decembra 2004.
The resolution on ‘Celebrating the Tenth Anniversary of the International Year of the Family’ (document A/59/L.29) was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 6 December 2004.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0032/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0032/05
Zadeva: Kako Kitajska izvaja pravila WTO
Subject: Implementation of WTO rules by China
Kitajska je leta 2001 postala članica WTO.
China became a member of the WTO in 2001.
Evropska unija na splošno, in še posebej Evropski parlament, sta aktivno podpirala pristop Kitajske k WTO.
The European Union in general and the European Parliament in particular had been actively supporting Chinese accession to the WTO.
Članstvo v WTO pogojuje sprejetje discipline in upoštevanje pravil, ki jih določijo vse članice organizacije in ki veljajo za vse članice.
Membership of the WTO entails acceptance of the discipline and compliance with the rules which are established by, and which apply to, all its members.
Od evropskih podjetij prihajajo zaskrbljujoči namigi, da se Kitajska ne drži teh pravil.
Alarming signals are coming from European companies to the effect that China is not abiding by those rules.
Ali se Komisija zaveda:
Is the Commission aware of:
težav, povezanih z znatnim povečanjem uvoza tekstila iz Kitajske,
the problems relating to the dramatic increase in textile imports from China,
nezadostnega izvrševanja pravic intelektualne lastnine na Kitajskem, kar povzroča množično ponarejanje, saj kar 70% tovrstnih izdelkov, ki dospejo na trg EU, izvira iz Kitajske,
the lack of enforcement of intellectual property rights in China, which has resulted in counterfeiting on a massive scale, with 70 per cent of such goods that enter the EU market originating in China,
da Kitajska zavrača odprtje svojega lastnega trga in je pripravljena zaščititi domačo industrijo s pomočjo nepreglednega izvajanja predpisov, diskriminacije tujih podjetij in drugih netarifnih trgovinskih ovir.
China’s refusal to open up its own market and its complicity in protecting its domestic industries by failing to ensure transparency in its regulatory practices, by discriminating against foreign companies and by erecting other non-tariff barriers to trade?
Kakšne ukrepe je Komisija v luči trenutnih pogajanj WTO pripravila v zvezi s Kitajsko in njenim pomanjkljivim izvajanjem obvez v okviru WTO?
In the light of the ongoing WTO negotiations, how is the Commission dealing with China’s shortcomings in the honouring of its WTO commitments?
Kako Komisija uporablja priložnosti, ki izhajajo iz mehanizma za pregled prehoda, za pregled napredka Kitajske na tem področju in za odziv na pomanjkanje napredka na zgoraj omenjenih področjih?
How is the Commission using the opportunities arising from the Transition Review Mechanism to review China’s progress in the field and to react to the lack of progress in the areas listed above?
Bi lahko Komisija preučila praktične rešitve za to očitno nepravično konkurenco, ki izhaja iz nezadostnega izvajanja pravil WTO s strani Kitajske?
Could the Commission reflect on practical solutions to this obviously unfair competition resulting from China’s insufficient implementation of WTO rules?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0033/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0033/05
Zadeva: Desetletje romske integracije 2005-2015
Subject: The Decade of Roma Inclusion 2005-2015
Osem evropskih predsednikov držav in vlad je 2. februarja 2005 v Sofiji objavilo "Desetletje romske integracije 2005-2015".
On 2 February 2005, in Sofia, eight European Heads of State or Government launched the 'Decade of Roma inclusion 2005-2015'.
Zavezali so se, da si bodo prizadevali za odpravo diskriminacije in razlik med Romi in preostalo družbo.
They pledged to work towards the elimination of discrimination against Roma and towards closing the unacceptable gaps between Roma and the remainder of society.
Na kakšen način namerava Komisija sodelovati pri uresničevanju ciljev tega projekta?
How does the Commission intend to contribute to the attainment of the aims of this undertaking?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena redno poročati o doseženem napredku na področju integracije Romov v evropsko družbo?
Is the Commission prepared to report regularly on the progress of the integration of Roma into European society?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0034/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0034/05
, v imenu skupine GUE/NGL ,
, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group,
Zadeva: Odpuščanje v Alstomu
Subject: Redundancies at Alstom
7. julija 2004 je Komisija odobrila načrt prestrukturiranja vodstva skupine Alstom, in ji tudi dovolila dalje delovati.
On 7 July 2004, the Commission approved the management's plan for the restructuring of the Alstom group, enabling Alstom to continue to operate.
Z dogovorjenimi pogoji, je bil Alstom v stanju, kjer bi moral preživeti.
Under the approved conditions, Alstom was viable.
Že nekaj mesecev pozneje, 15. decembra 2004, je vodstvo skupine Alstom ponovno oznanilo ukinitev 350 delovnih mest v Franciji in Nemčiji.
Only a few months later, on 15 December 2004, the management of the Alstom group announced further redundancies, this time approximately 350 in France and Germany.
Odločitev zadeva predvsem področje Vélizyja (Francija), objavljena je bila ukinitev od 200 do 250 delovnih mest, ogroža pa tudi prihodnost centra za raziskave, ki deluje na področju čiste energije.
The most jobs were to be lost at Vélizy in France, where 200 jobs out of a total of 250 were to go, thus destroying the future prospects of this research centre which focuses particularly on clean energy.
Težko bo prizadela tudi področje Stuttgarta.
It also has serious implications for the Stuttgart establishment.
Kakšno je stališče Evropske komisije o tem dodatnem prestrukturiranju, ki ni bilo predvideno v načrtu spomladi 2004 za rešitev Alstoma in, katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti za ustavitev odpuščanja in zapiranja na področju Vélizyja, ko pa se je Komisija zavezala postati najbolj konkurenčno in dinamično, na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svet, s trajnim razvojem in številnimi delovnimi mesti v Evropi?
What is the Commission's position regarding this additional restructuring which was not provided for in the plan for the rescue of Alstom drawn up in the spring of 2004, and what measures will the Commission take to prevent these redundancies and the closure of the Vélizy establishment at a time when the Commission claims to be setting the objectives for becoming the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world and objectives for sustainable development and full employment in Europe?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0035/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0035/05
Evropska unija na splošno, in še posebej Evropski parlament, sta aktivno podpirala pristop Kitajske k WTO.
The European Union in general and the European Parliament in particular had been actively supporting the accession of China to the WTO.