natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0010/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0010/08
Zadeva: Vrh med Evropsko unijo ter državami Latinske Amerike in karibskimi državami (Lima, 16. in 17. maj 2008)
Subject: European Union-Latin America and Caribbean Summit (Lima, 16 and 17 May 2008)
V zvezi z izvajanjem ciljev predhodnega vrha EU-LAK, ki je potekal maja 2006 na Dunaju:
Concerning the implementation of the objectives of the previous EU-LAC Summit, held in Vienna (Austria) in May 2006:
Katere ukrepe je sprejel Svet, da bi socialno kohezijo postavil na prvo mesto v programih medregionalnega sodelovanja in pomoči; sodeloval pri reformi Združenih narodov ter pri reformi Svetovne banke in Mednarodnega denarnega sklada za izboljšanje pravil o finančnih tokovih; ter da bi opredelil skupna stališča in ukrepe med državami LAK in EU v okviru različnih organov Združenih narodov in na glavnih konferencah Združenih narodov?
What measures have been adopted by the Council to give social cohesion the highest priority in the bi-regional cooperation and assistance programmes; to cooperate in the reform of the UN, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to improve the cash flow regulation; and to define common positions and joint actions between LAC and EU within various UN bodies and at major UN conferences?
Glede pogajanj o pridružitvenih sporazumih med Mercosurjem, Srednjo Ameriko, Andsko skupnostjo ter Evropsko unijo: katera navodila bo Svet dal pogajalcem za okrepitev njihovih prizadevanj, da bi se pogajanja premaknila naprej?
Concerning the negotiations on the association agreements between Mercosur, Central America, the Andean Community and the EU, how does the Council intend to instruct the negotiators to intensify their efforts to move the negotiation process forward?
V zvezi s cilji petega vrha EU-LAK, ki bo potekal 16. in 17. maja 2008 v Limi v Peruju:
Concerning the objectives on the fifth EU-LAC Summit to be held on 16 and 17 May 2008 in Lima, Peru:
Katere pobude bo Svet predlagal vrhu v okviru razprave o temah, kot so regionalno povezovanje, razvojno sodelovanje, demokracija, človekove pravice in migracije?
What initiatives will the Council propose to the Summit in the debate on topics such as regional integration, development cooperation, democracy and human rights and migration?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0011/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0011/08
Katere ukrepe je sprejela Komisija, da bi socialno kohezijo postavila na prvo mesto v programih medregionalnega sodelovanja in pomoči; sodelovala pri reformi Združenih narodov ter pri reformi Svetovne banke in Mednarodnega denarnega sklada za izboljšanje pravil o finančnih tokovih; ter da bi opredelila skupna stališča in ukrepe med državami LAK in EU v okviru različnih organov Združenih narodov in na glavnih konferencah Združenih narodov?
What measures have been adopted by the Commission to give social cohesion the highest priority in the bi-regional cooperation and assistance programmes; to cooperate in the reform of the UN, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to improve the cash flow regulation; and to define common positions and joint actions between LAC and EU within various UN bodies and at major UN conferences?
Glede pogajanj o pridružitvenih sporazumih med Mercosurjem, Srednjo Ameriko, Andsko skupnostjo ter Evropsko unijo: kako namerava Komisija okrepiti prizadevanja, da bi se pogajanja premaknila naprej?
Concerning the negotiations on the association agreements between Mercosur, Central America, the Andean Community and the EU, how will the Commission intensify its efforts to move the negotiation process forward?
Katere pobude bo Komisija predlagala vrhu v okviru razprave o temah, kot so regionalno povezovanje, razvojno sodelovanje, demokracija in človekove pravice, ter še o posebej migracijah?
What initiatives will the Commission propose to the Summit in the debate on topics such as regional integration, development cooperation, democracy and human rights, and, in particular, on migration?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0012/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0012/08
Zadeva: Upoštevanje odločitev Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti s strani Sveta
Subject: Compliance of the Council with decisions of the Court of Justice
12. decembra 2006 je na podlagi tožbe, ki jo je vložila Organizacija Mudžahidov iranskega ljudstva, Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti razglasilo Sklep Evropskega sveta 2005/930/ES , s katerim je bila omenjena Organizacija uvrščena na seznam prepovedanih organizacij, za ničnega.
On 12 December 2006, following an action brought by the People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran (PMOI), the Court of First Instance of the European Communities annulled European Council Decision 2005/930/EC including the PMOI in its list of banned organisations.
Vendar pa je Svet zavrnil upoštevanje odločitve Sodišča, z navedbo, da je bila sodba, prvič, utemeljena le na postopkovnih napakah, ki so bile že popravljene z novim Sklepom št. 2006/379/ES , in drugič, da sodba ne more odpraviti prepovedi Organizacije Mudžahidov iranskega ljudstva, dokler je ta na britanskem seznamu terorističnih organizacij.
However, the Council refused to comply with the Court's ruling, claiming first that the judgment was based only on procedural defects that had already been rectified by a new decision 2006/379/EC and, secondly, that it could not deproscribe the PMOI as long as it was in the British terror list.
28. junija 2007 je Svet ne glede na odločitev Sodišča ponovno uvrstil Organizacijo Mudžahidov iranskega ljudstva na svoj seznam.
On 28 June 2007 the Council put the PMOI back on its list, disregarding the Court's ruling.
30. novembra 2007 je britansko sodišče (komisija za pritožbe prepovedanih organizacij) odločilo, da je sklep britanskega notranjega ministra, da Organizacija Mudžahidov iranskega ljudstva ostane na seznamu terorističnih organizacij, slab, in da je zato treba odpraviti prepoved v zvezi s to organizacijo.
On 30 November 2007 the British Court (Proscribed Organisations Appeals Commission) ruled that the decision of the British Home Secretary to keep the PMOI on the black list of terrorist organisations was perverse and that as a consequence the PMOI should be deproscribed.
Nazadnje 14. decembra britansko sodišče ni dovolilo državnemu sekretarju, da bi vložil pritožbo, zaradi pomanjkanja razumnih možnosti za uspeh.
Lastly, on 14 December the British Court refused to give the Secretary of State leave to appeal on the grounds of lack of reasonable prospects of succeeding.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj omenjenega, katere utemeljene razloge lahko Svet navede za neupoštevanje sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje?
In the light of the foregoing, what reasonable grounds can the Council have for disregarding the judgment of the Court of First Instance?
Je po mnenju Sveta običajno, da institucija Skupnosti ne upošteva sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje?
Does the Council consider it normal for a Community Institution to disregard a judgment of the Court of First Instance?
Ali namerava Svet v luči sodbe britanskega sodišča in odklonitve dovoljenja za vložitev pritožbe sedaj izpolniti odločitev Sodišča?
Does the Council now intend to implement the Court's ruling in the light of the British Court's judgment and the refusal to grant leave to appeal?
UL L 340, z dne 23.12.2005, str.
OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p.
UL L 144, z dne 31.5.2006, str.
OJ L 144, 31.5.2006, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0013/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0013/08
Zadeva: Zelena knjiga Komisije "Prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam v Evropi - možnosti za ukrepanje EU" (KOM(2007)0354)
Subject: The Green Paper on 'Adapting to climate change in Europe - options for EU action' (COM(2007)0354)
Katere ukrepe in pobude, namenjene prilagajanju podnebnim spremembam, namerava sprejeti Komisija na ravni EU in na področju zunanjih odnosov v odgovor na sklepe delovne skupine II iz četrtega ocenjevalnega poročila medvladnega odbor za podnebne spremembe, ki napovedujejo negativne posledice sedanjih in prihodnjih vplivov podnebnih sprememb?
What actions and initiatives aiming at adapting to climate change does the Commission intend to adopt at EU level and in its external relations policy to respond to the conclusions of Working Group II of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report anticipating negative effects by current and future impacts of climate change?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0014/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0014/08
Zadeva: Boj proti raku v razširjeni Evropski uniji
Subject: Combating cancer in the enlarged European Union
Rak je zelo obsežen niz bolezni in veliko zdravstveno breme, ki se bo gotovo povečalo, saj se evropsko prebivalstvo stara in vse več ljudi preživi druge bolezni.
Cancer is a very complex set of diseases and a major health burden which is set to increase as the European population ages and more and more people survive other diseases.
V Evropski uniji zaradi raka vsako leto umre več kot milijon ljudi.
It is accounting for over 1 million deaths in the EU each year.
Kdaj namerava Komisija nadgraditi ukrepe iz programa Evropa proti raku in sprejeti priporočilo za celostno strategijo nadzora rakavih obolenj, ki bo obravnavala štiri osnovne dejavnike nadzora rakavih obolenj: preprečevanje, zgodnje odkrivanje, diagnosticiranje, zdravljenje in oskrbo, vključno s paliativno oskrbo?
When does the Commission plan to follow up on the actions from the Europe against Cancer Programme by adopting a recommendation for a comprehensive cancer control strategy addressing the four basic cancer control factors: prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment and care, including palliative care?
Kakšne načrte ima Komisija v zvezi s predlogom vzpostavitve referenčnih omrežji za redka in težko ozdravljiva rakava obolenja, ki bodo v skladu s predlogi za mobilnost bolnikov dobivala podporo iz strukturnih skladov in okvirnih raziskovalnih programov Skupnosti?
What are the Commission's plans to propose the setting up of reference networks for rare and difficult-to-treat cancers, supported by Structural Funds and the Community Framework Research Programmes under the patient mobility proposals?
Kako namerava Komisija glede na dejstvo, da preventivni pregledi v zvezi z rakom rešujejo življenja, posodobiti in okrepiti obstoječa priporočila za zgodnje odkrivanje raka?
Given that cancer screening saves lives, what plans does the Commission have to update and strengthen existing screening recommendations?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0015/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0015/08
Zadeva: Ukrepi po pregledu Lamfalussyjevega postopka
Subject: Follow-up after the review of the Lamfalussy process
Pregled Lamfalussyjevega postopka – Okrepitev konvergence nadzora (KOM(2007)0727) Evropske komisije prinaša določeno število ukrepov za okrepitev Lamfalussyjevega postopka in spodbudo sodelovanju pri nadzoru in konvergenci.
The European Commission review of the Lamfalussy process – Strengthening supervisory convergence (COM(2007)0727) – lays down a set of actions aiming to strengthen the Lamfalussy process and enhance supervisory cooperation and convergence.
Podobna priporočila je v poročilu o izvajanju in delovanju Lamfalussyjevega postopka zapisala tudi medinstitucionalna skupina za spremljanje.
The Interinstitutional Monitoring Group final report on the implementation and functioning of the Lamfalussy process has voiced similar recommendations.
Svet ECOFIN se je sestal 4. decembra 2007 in pregledal Lamfalussyjev postopek.
The ECOFIN Council met on 4 December 2007 and reviewed the Lamfalussy process.
V sklepih sveta ECOFIN je poudarjena potreba po uspešnem in učinkovitem nadzoru skupin, ki opravljajo čezmejne dejavnosti, orisan pa je še načrt z nalogami za izboljšanje trenutnega stanja.
The ECOFIN Council Conclusions also underline the need for efficient and effective supervision of cross-border groups, and draw a roadmap of tasks designed to improve the current situation.
Tudi sklepi sveta ECOFIN z 9. oktobra 2007 o ukrepih Unije za finančno stabilnost jasno navajajo, da je potrebno boljše sodelovanje med pristojnimi nadzornimi organi in institucijami.
Moreover, previous ECOFIN Council Conclusions of 9 October 2007 on EU arrangements for financial stability clearly indicate that a better coordination between the relevant supervisory authorities and institutions involved is needed.
S tem namenom je svet ECOFIN sprejel strateški načrt, zgrajen na priporočilih iz poročila ad hoc delovne skupine Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora o finančni stabilnosti.
To this end, the ECOFIN Council adopted a strategic roadmap, building upon the recommendations of the report of the EFC ad-hoc working group on financial stability.
Evropski parlament, ki že dolgo opozarja na potrebo po večji konvergenci nacionalnih nadzornih praks in izboljšanju obstoječih postopkov kriznega upravljanja v Uniji, pozdravlja oboje sklepe sveta ECOFIN in se pridružuje stališču, da je treba obstoječe nadzorne ukrepe na nacionalni, pa tudi nadnacionalni ravni, uskladiti z ukrepi za krizno upravljanje / finančno stabilnost.
The European Parliament, which has long called for an increased convergence of national supervisory practices and improvement of existing crisis management arrangements in the EU, therefore welcomes both ECOFIN Council Conclusions, and shares the view that a consistency between the evolution of going concern supervisory arrangements, both at national and cross-border levels, and that of crisis management/ financial stability arrangements is needed.
Ob upoštevanju obojih sklepov sveta ECOFIN in finančne krize, ki se vse bolj nakazuje in katere hitrost je že presenetila številne udeležence na trgu in nadzornike, pa ob upoštevanju groženj, ki zaradi te krize visijo nad finančnimi trgi Unije, in njihovem vplivu na gospodarstvo Unije, kateri koraki so po mnenju predsedstva Sveta ustrezni na tem področju za boljše odzivanje na izzive globalno povezanih trgov in za ohranitev zdravih in stabilnih finančnih trgov Unije?
Having regard to the two ECOFIN Council Conclusions, and to the still-unfolding financial crisis whose speed and pace has taken by surprise many market participants and supervisors, having regard to the threats the crisis still poses to the EU financial markets and to its spill-over into the EU economy, what does the Presidency consider as appropriate steps to be undertaken in this area in order to better respond to the challenges of globally integrated markets and to preserve the soundness and stability of the EU financial markets?
Kako bi pri tem lahko sodelovala Evropski parlament in Komisija?
And how would the EP and the Commission be involved?
Ali je Svet Komisijo zaprosil, da pripravi predloge za nadaljnjo razpravo z Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom?
Is the Council asking the Commission to put on the table proposals to be discussed as further steps with the European Parliament and the Council?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0016/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0016/08
Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom „Pregled Lamfalussyjevega postopka – Okrepitev konvergence nadzora“ (KOM(2007)0727) prinaša določeno število ukrepov za okrepitev Lamfalussyjevega postopka in spodbudo sodelovanju pri nadzoru in konvergenci.
The Communication from the Commission on the review of the Lamfalussy process –Strengthening supervisory convergence (COM(2007)0727) – lays down a set of actions aiming to strengthen the Lamfalussy process and enhance supervisory cooperation and convergence.
S tem namenom je v sklepih sveta ECOFIN pripravljen načrt z nalogami za izboljšanje trenutnega stanja.
The ECOFIN Council Conclusions to this end draw a roadmap of tasks designed to improve the current situation.
Za izpolnitev tega cilja je svet ECOFIN sprejel strateški načrt, zgrajen na priporočilih iz poročila ad hoc delovne skupine Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora o finančni stabilnosti.
To meet this objective, the ECOFIN Council adopted a strategic roadmap, building upon the recommendations of the report of the EFC ad hoc working group on financial stability.
Evropski parlament, ki je že večkrat pozval k večji konvergenci nacionalnih nadzornih praks in izboljšanju obstoječih postopkov kriznega upravljanja v Uniji, pozdravlja glavne predlagane ukrepe v sporočilu Komisije.
The European Parliament, which has voiced several calls for increased convergence of national supervisory practices and improvement of existing crisis management arrangements in the EU, welcomes the main actions proposed in the Commission Communication.
Ob upoštevanju obojih sklepov sveta ECOFIN, ob upoštevanju finančne krize, ki se vse bolj nakazuje in katere hitrost je že presenetila številne udeležence na trgu in nadzornike, pa ob upoštevanju groženj, ki zaradi te krize visijo nad finančnimi trgi Unije, in njihovem vplivu na gospodarstvo Unije, kaj namerava Komisija na tem področju ukreniti za boljše odzivanje na izzive globalno povezanih trgov in za ohranitev zdravih in stabilnih finančnih trgov Unije?
Having regard to the two ECOFIN Council Conclusions, having regard to the still-unfolding financial crisis whose speed and pace has taken by surprise many market participants and supervisors, and having regard to the threats the crisis still poses to the EU financial markets and to its spill-over into the EU economy, what is the Commission intending to undertake in this area in order to better respond to the challenges of globally integrated markets and to preserve the soundness and stability of the EU financial markets?
Ali se je Komisija pripravljena odzvati na pozive zainteresiranih strani in pripraviti predloge za nadaljnjo razpravo z Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom?
Is the Commission ready to respond to the appeals of the stakeholders and to put on the table proposals to be discussed as further steps with the EP and Council?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0017/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0017/08
Zadeva: Novi dokazi o vpletenosti držav članic EU v izročitve Cie v Guantanamu
Subject: New evidence of EU Member States involved in CIA renditions to Guantanamo
Nedavno poročilo „Potovanje smrti“, ki ga je izdala nevladna organizacija Reprieve iz Združenega kraljestva, razkriva, da sta bila med letoma 2002 in 2006 portugalsko ozemlje in zračni prostor uporabljena za prevoz več kot 700 zapornikov, da bi jih mučili in nezakonito zaprli v zalivu Guantanamo.
A recent report, 'Journey of Death', released by the NGO Reprieve, UK, reveals that Portuguese territory and airspace were used between 2002 and 2006 to transfer over 700 prisoners to torture and illegal imprisonment in Guantanamo Bay.
To poročilo je bilo izdelano s primerjavo letalskih dnevnikov, ki so jih izročili portugalski organi, s podatki ministrstva za obrambo ZDA, ki prikazujejo datume prihodov zapornikov v zaliv Guantanamo, in netajnega pričanja mnogih zapornikov.
This report was compiled by comparing flight logs produced by Portuguese authorities, information from the US Department of Defence showing dates of arrival of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, and unclassified testimony from many of the prisoners themselves.
Poleg tega je danska vlada že od leta 2005 vedela, da Cia uporablja danski letalski prostor in letališča za prevoz zapornikov.
Moreover, the Danish Government has been aware since 2005 that Danish airspace and airports were used by the CIA for transportation of prisoners.
Kaj namerava ukreniti Svet glede na ta nova odkritja?
Taking into account these new revelations, what measures does the Council intend to take?
Ali bo Svet zahteval, da Portugalska in Danska izvedeta poglobljeno in javno preiskavo, da bi v celoti preiskali te kršitve mednarodne zakonodaje?
Will the Council request that Portugal and Denmark hold an in-depth and public inquiry to fully investigate these breaches of international law?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0018/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0018/08
Nedavno poročilo „Potovanje smrti“, ki ga je izdala nevladna organizacija Reprieve iz Velike Britanije, razkriva, da sta bila med letoma 2002 in 2006 portugalsko ozemlje in zračni prostor uporabljena za prevoz več kot 700 zapornikov, da bi jih mučili in nezakonito zaprli v zalivu Guantanamo.
A recent report, 'Journey of Death', released by the NGO Reprieve, UK, reveals that Portuguese territory and airspace were used between 2002 and 2006 to transfer over 700 prisoners to torture and illegal imprisonment in Guantanamo Bay.
Kaj namerava ukreniti Komisija glede na ta nova odkritja?
Taking into account these new revelations, what measures does the Commission intend to take?
Ali bo Komisija zahtevala, da Portugalska in Danska izvedeta poglobljeno in javno preiskavo, da bi v celoti preiskali te kršitve mednarodne zakonodaje?
Will the Commission request that Portugal and Denmark hold an in-depth and public inquiry to fully investigate these breaches of international law?
Ali lahko Komisija poroča Parlamentu o odgovorih na njegovo pismo poljski in romunski vladi s 23. julija 2007, v katerem je zahteval podrobne informacije o rezultatu preiskave, ki je potekala v obeh državah?
Can the Commission report back to the Parliament on the answers to its letter of 23 July 2007 to the Polish and Romanian Governments requesting detailed information about the outcome of the inquiries which took place in both countries?
Ali lahko Komisija poroča Parlamentu o rezultatih vprašalnika, ki je bil poslan državam članicam EU, o njihovih protiterorističnih ukrepih?
Can the Commission report back to the Parliament about the results of the questionnaire sent to all EU Member States on their respective counter-terrorism measures?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0019/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0019/08
Zadeva: Ukrepi za liberalizacijo vizumske ureditve za Ukrajino
Subject: Visa liberalisation measures for Ukraine
Sporazum o vizumskih olajšavah med Ukrajino in Evropsko unijo je bil sklenjen 29. novembra 2007, veljati pa je začel januarja 2008.
The visa facilitation agreement between Ukraine and the European Union was agreed on 29 November 2007 and entered into force in January 2008.
To je res šele prvi korak, vendar bodo ugodnosti, ki jih prinaša, veljale le za omejeno število ukrajinskih državljanov, ki bodo lahko izkoristili vizum za večkratni vstop, poenostavljene postopke ali opustitev pristojbine za izdajo, medtem ko večini ukrajinskih državljanov, ki si želijo obiskati Evropsko unijo, ne bo prinesel oprijemljivejših koristi.
However, even acknowledging that the agreement is only a first step, its consequences will be limited to a select group of Ukrainian citizens that benefit from multiple-entry visa, simplified procedures or a waiving of the application fee, while the majority of citizens of Ukraine that wish to visit the European Union will not enjoy any tangible benefits.
Maja 2005 je Ukrajina enostransko odpravila vizume za državljane EU, da bi pospešila proces približevanja, turizem in medčloveške stike.
In May 2005, Ukraine unilaterally abolished visa requirements for EU citizens to boost the integration process and stimulate tourism and people-to-people contacts.
Odziv EU je bil počasen, konzularni postopki in zahteve za pridobitev vizuma v državah članicah pa ne vedno v skladu z izraženim ciljem EU, da bi se odnosi med Ukrajino in EU poglobili.
However, the EU response has been slow and the consular procedures of the EU Member States and the visa requirements have not always been in line with the EU's stated objective of closer contacts between Ukraine and the EU.
Ali namerava Svet to pomlad predlagati, da se oblikuje jasen načrt ukrepov, ki jih bo treba sprejeti, da bo mogoče odpraviti vizume za Ukrajino?
Will the Council this spring provide Ukraine with a clear roadmap on measures to be taken in order to move towards abolishing the visa requirements?
Ali je Svet morda že ugotovil negativne posledice širitve schengenskega območja, ki se je zgodila 1. januarja 2008, za Ukrajino?
Has the Council identified any early negative consequences for Ukraine of the extension of the Schengen area from 1 January 2008?
Ali ima Svet podatke o tem, ali katera od držav članic za izdajo vizumov zaračunava pristojbino, višjo od zahtevanih 35 EUR?
Does the Council have any information on Member States charging more than the requested € 35 as the visa processing fee?