natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če dejansko obstaja potreba po ukrepih na ravni EU, zakaj se je Komisija odločila, da ustvari le obveznost za države članice, da zberejo in uporabijo podatke iz evidence imen letalskih potnikov, ni pa vzpostavila pravega programa EU?
If there is a demonstrable need for EU action, why does the Commission choose to merely create the obligation for Member States to collect and use PNR data, rather than set up a real EU scheme?
Ali Komisija soglaša, da skupek 27 nacionalnih ureditev nima evropske dodane vrednosti in ustvarja pravno negotovost za državljane in letalske prevoznike?
Does the Commission agree that a patchwork of 27 national regimes has no European added value and creates legal uncertainty for citizens and carriers?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0101/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0101/08
Zadeva: Vpliv varnostnih ukrepov v letalstvu ter naprav za skeniranje telesa na človekove pravice, zasebnost, varstvo podatkov in osebno dostojanstvo
Subject: Impact of aviation security measures and of body scanners on human rights, privacy, data protection and personal dignity
Evropska komisija je predlagala, da bi se med dovoljene metode za pregledovanje potnikov na letališčih EU uvrstile tudi naprave za skeniranje telesa (t. i. "body scanners"), to so naprave, ki uporabljajo tehnologijo radijskih valov ekstremno visokih frekvenc in ki omogočajo izredno natančno slikanje oseb, kot če bi bile gole, tudi spolovil.
The European Commission has proposed to include among the allowed methods for screening passengers in EU airports the so-called ‘body scanners’, that is to say ‘millimeter wave’-based technology machines that show images of persons as if they were naked, in an extremely detailed manner, genitalia included.
Ta ukrep resno vpliva na temeljne človekove pravice, na primer pravico do zasebnosti, varstva podatkov in osebnega dostojanstva.
The measure has a serious impact on fundamental human rights, such as the right to privacy, to data protection and to personal dignity.
Ali se Komisija ne strinja, da:
Does the Commission not think that the proposal:
– ta predlog presega zgolj tehnične ukrepe v civilnem letalstvu in se ne more pregledati po postopku komitologije, pa tudi pravna podlaga za to je očitno neustrezna, saj varnostna vprašanja spadajo v tretji steber; in da so metode, zahteve in postopki za preglede tesno prepleteni in bi jih bilo treba pregledati hkrati, zahtevajo pa tudi popoln demokratični nadzor Evropskega parlamenta?
– goes beyond merely technical measures related to civil aviation and cannot be examined according to the comitology procedure, while the legal basis of the act consequently seems to be inadequate, as security issues fall under the third pillar, and methods, requirements and procedures for screening are closely interlinked and should be examined at the same time and require full democratic scrutiny from the European Parliament?
– ta predlog v demokratični družbi odpira vprašanja glede sorazmernosti in potrebnosti, tako da EU in države članice postavlja pred možnost sodnih postopkov zaradi kršenja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, pa tudi obsojanja organizacij za človekove pravice na nacionalni, evropski in mednarodni ravni?
– raises doubts in relation to its proportionality and necessity in a democratic society, so that it exposes the EU and its Member States to possible court cases in relation to violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as to condemnation by human rights bodies, at national, European and international level?
– bi moral predlog temeljiti na poglobljenih tehničnih in znanstvenih raziskavah o razpoložljivi in razvijajoči se tehnologiji, tako kot na primer za tekočine, in da je treba opraviti raziskave o morebitnem vplivu na zdravje potnikov?
– should be based on technical and scientific in-depth researches on the available technologies as well as of those that are being developed, such as that on liquids, and that researches should be done on the possible impact on passengers' health?
– zaradi navedenih razlogov osnutek ukrepa presega izvedbene pristojnosti iz temeljnega instrumenta, ni skladen z njegovim ciljem in vsebino in pri tem nista upoštevani načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti?
– that for the abovementioned reasons, the draft measure exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic instrument, is not compatible with the aim and the content of the basic instrument and does not respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality?
UL L 8, 12.1.2001, str.
OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0102/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0102/08
Zadeva: Revizija sporočila o radiodifuziji - državna pomoč za javno radiotelevizijo
Subject: Revision of the Broadcasting Communication - State aid for public broadcasting
Sporočilo o radiodifuziji iz leta 2001 po mnenju komisarke za konkurenco Neelie Kroes zagotavlja dragocene smernice medijskim podjetjem, izvajalcem storitev javne radiodifuzije in državam članicam.
According to the Competition Commissioner, Mrs Neelie Kroes, the 2001 Broadcasting Communication guarantees valuable guidance to media companies, public broadcasters and Member States.
Vendar pa komisarka meni, da bi ga lahko učinkovito izboljšali in s tem povečali preglednost in pravno varnost.
However, she considers that there may be ways it can be usefully improved in order to increase transparency and legal certainty.
Neelie Kroes je na seminarju o radiodifuziji (17. julija 2008 v Strasbourgu) opredelila smernice za revizijo sporočila o radiodifuziji:
In her speech to the Strasbourg broadcasting seminar (Strasbourg, 17 July 2008) Mrs Kroes defined the guidelines for the revision of the Broadcasting Communication:
– izboljšanje ocene učinka državne pomoči na trg na področju novih medijev
– better assessment of market impact of State aid in the new media
– vzpostavitev učinkovitejših nadzornih mehanizmov na tem področju
– introducing more effective control mechanisms in the new media environment
– izboljšanje opredelitve naloge izpolnjevanja javnega interesa izdajateljev radijskega in televizijskega programa pri vstopu na trge novih medijev
– better definition for the public mission of broadcasters where they enter new media markets
Ker ima javna radiotelevizija pomembno vlogo na področju kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti, ker omogoča pluralizem medijev, javnosti zagotavlja kakovostne programe ter na splošno izpolnjuje kulturne, socialne in demokratične potrebe družbe, poudarjamo, da mora Evropski parlament sodelovati pri sedanjem postopku revizije sporočila o radiodifuziji.
Given that public service broadcasting plays a crucial role with regard to cultural and linguistic diversity, facilitates media pluralism, provides the public with high quality programming and in general answers cultural, social and democratic needs of society, we stress that the European Parliament must be involved in the current process of revising the Broadcasting Communication.
Kako bo Evropska komisija dejansko vključila Evropski parlament v revizijo sporočila o radiodifuziji?
How concretely will the Commission involve Parliament in the revision of the Broadcasting Communication?
Je zahteva po vnaprejšnji oceni skladna s pristojnostmi Komisije iz Pogodbe EU ter zlasti z Amsterdamskim protokolom in zakonodajo Skupnosti v zvezi s storitvami splošnega pomena?
Is the ex ante assessment requirement compatible with the Commission's competences under the EU Treaty and, in particular, the Amsterdam Protocol and Community law regarding services of general interest?
Ali prinaša vnaprejšnja ocena nepotrebno upravno in finančno breme za države članice in izvajalce storitev javne radiodifuzije?
Does ex ante assessment place an unnecessary administrative and financial burden on Member States and public service broadcasters?
Ali je v javnem interesu, da se ob opredelitvi obsega dejavnosti izvajalcev storitev javne radiodifuzije upoštevajo obstoječe ponudbe na trgu in interes komercialnih medijev?
Is it in the public interest to take into account the existing market offers and interests of the commercial media while defining the scope of the remit and activities of public service broadcasters?
Kateri so naslednji koraki pri reviziji sporočila o radiodifuziji?
What are the next steps in the revision of the Broadcasting Communication?
Kdaj lahko Evropski parlament pričakuje prvi osnutek tega sporočila?
When can Parliament expect a first draft version of the Communication?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0103/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0103/08
Zadeva: Program reform za poljske ladjedelnice
Subject: Reform programme for Polish shipyards
Ladjedelniška industrija ima globalen značaj.
Shipbuilding is a global industry.
Na svetovne trge so namreč vstopile azijske ladjedelnice, kar je povzročilo resne težave ladjedelnicam v nekaterih državah članicah EU.
In particular, Asian shipyards have entered the world markets, causing serious problems for shipyards in some of the EU Member States.
Ladjedelniška industrija na Poljskem povzroča posebno skrb, zlasti ladjedelnice v Szczecinu, Gdansku and Gdynii.
The shipbuilding industry in Poland has been a matter of special concern, in particular with regard to the shipyards in Szczecin, Gdansk and Gdynia.
V zadnjih letih so bile te ladjedelnice deležne velike javne finančne pomoči, namenjene prestrukturiranju in modernizaciji ladjedelniške industrije na Poljskem.
Over the last few years these shipyards have received major public financial support with the aim of restructuring and modernising the shipbuilding industry in Poland.
Evropska komisija je določila smernice za proces prestrukturiranja, privatizacije in omejitve zmogljivosti tega industrijskega sektorja.
The Commission has defined guidelines for this process of restructuring, privatising and restricting the output of this sector of industry.
Dve zaporedni poljski vladi doslej nista v celoti nista izpolnili teh zahtev.
In the past these requirements have not been fully respected by two consecutive Polish governments.
12. septembra 2008 pa je poljska vlada predložila potrebno dokumentacijo, ki jo trenutno preučuje pristojni komisar.
Eventually, however, on 12 September 2008 the Polish government submitted the necessary documents, which are being analysed by the Commissioner responsible.
Vlada je predstavila program reform in navedla potencialne vlagatelje.
The government presented the reform programme and indicated potential investors.
S tem je izpolnila pogoje za začetek procesa prestrukturiranja in oživitve ladjedelnic ter tako izpolnila zahteve Komisije.
By doing so it fulfilled the conditions for opening the process of restructuring and reviving the shipyards and thus fulfilled the requirements set by the Commission.
Čeprav pri Evropski komisiji pripravljajo negativen odgovor, lahko pričakujemo, da si bo Komisija vzela čas, da opravi celovito oceno učinkovitosti revidiranega programa, ki ga je predložila poljska vlada, ter končnega svežnja dogovorov med vlagatelji, vlado in sindikati.
Although a negative response is under preparation by the Commission, it could be expected that the Commission will take the time necessary to conduct a full assessment of the effectiveness of the revised programme proposed by the Polish government and the final package of agreements between investors, the government and trade unions.
Tak postopek se zdi nujen glede na morebitne obsežne socialne posledice te odločitve in glede na 100.000 ogroženih delovnih mest.
Such a procedure seems indispensable, considering the immense possible social implications of the decision and the 100 000 jobs which are at stake.
Ali so si pri Komisiji pripravljeni vzeti čas za izvedbo celovite ocene predlogov, ki jih je predstavila poljska vlada, in pripraviti pozitivno rešitev za ta pomembni industrijski sektor?
Is the Commission therefore prepared to take sufficient time to make a full assessment of the proposals presented by the Polish government and to come up with a positive solution for this important sector of industry?
Ali so pri Komisiji pripravljeni skupaj s poljsko vlado sprejeti vse ukrepe za okrepitev konkurenčnosti evropske ladjedelniške industrije in preprečiti stečaj treh velikih ladjedelnic?
Is the Commission prepared to take - together with the Polish government - all the measures necessary to strengthen the competitiveness of the European shipbuilding industry and to avoid a bankruptcy of three big shipyards?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0104/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0104/08
Zadeva: Stanje na področju čebelarstva
Subject: Situation in the bee-keeping sector
Svetovno in zlasti evropsko čebelarstvo ima velike težave pri ohranjanju staleža čebel.
Beekeepers all over the world (and especially in Europe) are encountering very serious difficulties as regards keeping bees healthy.
Pridobivanje čebeljih proizvodov je resno ogroženo.
The production of apicultural products is seriously under threat.
Bolj kot na to žalostno dejstvo pa je treba opozoriti na nevarnost zmanjšanja staleža čebel in posledično nezadostnega opraševanja.
Although this situation is deplorable in itself, attention should also be drawn to the prospect that a reduction in the bee population would result in inadequate pollination.
Brez domačih čebel in njihovega opraševanja ne bomo mogli proizvesti zadostne količine kakovostnih rastlin, sadja in zelenjave, ki so tako pomembni za prehranjevanje ljudi in živali.
Without domestic bees to pollinate plants we would no longer be able to produce the same quality and quantity of crops, fruits and vegetables which are such an important component in the diet of humans and animals.
Poleg nevarnosti za rastline, ki so odvisne od čebel, je ogrožena celotna biološka raznovrstnost.
This is not only a threat to crops which depend on bees but also to biodiversity in general.
V jedru izrednih razmer v zdravju čebel sta stalna prisotnost v panjih pršice Varroa – tako imenovani "čebelji aids" – ter širjenje Noseme ceranae.
The current bee health crisis is marked by the continued presence of the Varroa parasite in hives, common collapse disorder and the increased prevalence of Nosema ceranae.
Domače čebele ogrožajo tudi virusi in glivice.
Viral and fungal infections are also a threat to domestic bees.
Naši čebelarji pozimi izgubijo do 50 ali celo do 80 panjev.
Some beekeepers are losing up to 50 or even 80 hives each winter.
Znanstvene raziskave o patologijah in zdravilih zanje danes niso dovolj razvite.
Scientific research into bee diseases and into ways of tackling them continues to be under-developed.
Kaj je Komisija pripravljena storiti za:
What efforts is the Commission prepared to make in order to:
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0105/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0105/08
Zadeva: Uredba Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2201/2003 glede pristojnosti in o uvedbi pravil v zvezi s pravom, ki se uporablja v zakonskih sporih
Subject: Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 as regards jurisdiction and introducing rules concerning applicable law in matrimonial matters
Trenutni pravni položaj v EU glede težav, s katerimi se soočajo poročeni državljani EU, ki se želijo ločiti, nikakor ni zadovoljiv.
The current legal situation in the EU with regard to the problems faced by married EU citizens wishing to divorce is not satisfactory at all.
To zlasti velja za „mednarodne“ pare.
This concerns in particular 'international' couples.
Zaradi tega prihaja do situacij, v katerih je ločitev tako rekoč nemogoča, saj za to ni pristojno nobeno sodišče,oziroma prava, ki ga je izbral par, ni mogoče uporabiti.
This leads to situations where a divorce is virtually impossible because no court has jurisdiction or the law of the couple's choice is not applicable at all.
Obstoječo Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 je zato treba nujno spremeniti.
Therefore, the existing Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 , has urgently to be modified.
S predlogom za uredbo Sveta o spremembi omenjene uredbe glede pristojnosti in v zvezi s pravom, ki se uporablja v zakonskih sporih (KOM(2006)0399), se bo položaj znatno izboljšal.
The Proposal for a Council Regulation amending that Regulation as regards jurisdiction and applicable law in matrimonial matters (COM(2006)0399) will improve the situation considerably.
Ali obstaja možnost, da bo kmalu dosežen dogovor o predlogu Komisije (KOM(2006)0399)?
Is there any possibility in the very near future to reach an agreement on the Commission proposal (COM(2006)0399)?
UL L 338, 23.12.2003, str.
OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0106/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0106/08
Ali bi zato lahko vprašali Komisijo, če namerava umakniti predlog (KOM(2006)0399)?
Therefore, could we ask the Commission if it intends to withdraw proposal (COM(2006)0399)?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0107/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0107/08
Evropska komisija je predlagala, da bi se med dovoljene metode za pregledovanje potnikov na letališčih EU uvrstile tudi naprave za skeniranje telesa (t. i. "body scanners"), to so naprave, ki uporabljajo tehnologijo radijskih valov ekstremno visokih frekvenc in ki omogočajo izredno natančno slikanje oseb, kot če bi bile gole, tudi spolovil.
The Commission has proposed including among the permitted methods for screening of passengers at EU airports 'body scanners', that is to say 'millimetre wave'-based technology machines that make it possible to obtain images of persons as if they were naked, in an extremely detailed manner, genitalia included.
Ali bo Komisija zaradi resnega vpliva, ki ga ima ta ukrep na temeljne človekove pravice, pravico do zasebnosti, varstva podatkov in dostojanstva, storila naslednje:
On the basis of the serious impact of the measure on fundamental human rights, the right to privacy, data protection and dignity, will the Commission:
2. se posvetovala z evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov in delovno skupino iz člena 29 ter Agencijo za temeljne pravice?
Consult the EDPS, as well as the Article 29 Working Party and the Fundamental Rights Agency?
3. pojasnila, zakaj se predlaga, da bi to moral postati primarni sistem za pregledovanje, ne sekundarni?
Indicate why it is proposed that this should become a primary scanning system as opposed to a secondary one?
4. navedla, kateri ukrepi bodo sprejeti, da bi se preprečil vsiljiv vpogled v posameznikova spolovila in druge intimne dele telesa?
Indicate what measure will be taken to prevent any intrusive view of individuals' genitalia and other private parts of the body?
5. pojasnila, v katerih razmerah bi posameznik lahko odklonil takšen pregled?
Under what circumstances an individual would be able to refuse to be subjected to such scanning?
6. določila, katere metode hranjenja in odstranitve zbranih slik bi se uporabljale, če bi bil ta sistem sprejet?
What method of storage and disposal of images collected would be utilised should this system be adopted?
7. upravičila uporabo te tehnologije na evropskih letališčih v zvezi z višjo stopnjo nevarnosti, sorazmernostjo in nujnostjo takega ukrepa v demokratični družbi?
Justify the deployment of this technology across Europe's airports in terms of any increased threat level and the proportionality and necessity of the measure in a democratic society?
8. pojasnila, kako se lahko ukrep s takšnim učinkom na človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine obravnava kot zgolj tehnični ukrep v zvezi s civilnim letalstvom, ki se pregleda po postopku komitologije?
Explain how a measure which has such an impact on human rights and fundamental freedoms can be considered a mere technical measure related to civil aviation, to be examined according to the commitology procedure?
9. določila, katere zahteve in postopke bo predlagala, da se uporabi ta metoda pregledovanja, in po katerem postopku jih bo preučil Evropski parlament?
Detail which requirements and procedures will be proposed by the Commission to implement such a method of screening, and under which procedure they will be examined by the EP?
10. nadaljevala poglobljene tehnične in znanstvene raziskave o morebitnem vplivu na zdravje potnikov ter razpoložljivi in razvijajoči se tehnologiji, tako kot na primer za tekočine?
Carry out in-depth technical and scientific research into the possible impact on passengers' health and into the available technologies as well as those that are being developed, such as research on liquids?
11. pred sprejemom odločitve zagotovila široko, pregledno in odprto razpravo, pri kateri bodo imeli besedo potniki, zainteresirane strani in institucije – vključno z odborom LIBE – na ravni EU in nacionalni ravni, saj je to občutljivo vprašanje, ki posega na področje temeljnih državljanskih pravic?
Prior to any decision being taken, make sure that a wider, transparent and open debate involving passengers, stakeholders and institutions - including the LIBE Committee - at the EU and national level is held on such a delicate issue which affects fundamental citizens' rights?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0108/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0108/08
Zadeva: Položaj poljskih ladjedelnic
Subject: Situation of Polish shipyards
Poljska javnost je zelo zaskrbljena zaradi informacij, da bi Evropska komisija lahko zavrnila akcijske načrte, ki jih je poljska vlada predstavila v zvezi s prenovitvijo poljskih ladjedelnic, saj bi morale ladjedelnice v tem primeru vrniti javna sredstva, ki so jih prejele iz blagajne.
Public opinion in Poland is deeply concerned at reports that the Commission may reject the plan of action drawn up by the Polish Government for restructuring Poland's shipyards, as a result of which the public aid they received from the Polish state may have to be repaid.
To bi neizogibno privedlo do njihovega stečaja, pri čemer bi delo izgubilo kakih 200 000 ljudi, ki so zaposleni v ladjedelništvu in z njim povezanih sektorjih.
This would inevitably lead to bankruptcy, with the loss of some 200 000 jobs in the shipyards and related sectors.
Zaskrbljenost še povečuje strah, da je stečaj poljskih ladjedelnic v interesu konkurenčnih podjetij in da na Komisiji poteka lobiranje za sprejetje negativne odločitve.
These concerns are exacerbated by fears that the bankruptcy of Polish shipyards would serve the interests of its competitors and that the Commission is being lobbied to take decisions that would adversely affect them.
Poljska javnost meni, da restriktivno stališče glede dodeljevanja javne pomoči ladjedelnicam ni utemeljeno, saj se v istem času precej več javne pomoči namenja finančnim organizacijam.
The Polish public can see no justification for the restrictive approach being adopted to public aid for the shipyards, at a time when public money is being handed out on a much larger scale to financial institutions.
V luči omenjenega prosimo Komisijo, naj odgovori na sledeča vprašanja:
In the light of the above considerations, will the Commission answer the following:
Gospa komisarka, katere ugotovitve nameravate predstaviti Komisiji v zvezi z javno pomočjo za poljske ladjedelnice?
What conclusions will the Commissioner submit to the Commission regarding public aid for Polish shipyards?
Ali ne menite, da je v luči najnovejših primerov javne pomoči, ki so jo prejele banke in finančne ustanove, treba sprejeti manj restriktivno stališče v zvezi z dodeljevanjem javne pomoči podjetjem v industrijskem sektorju?
In view of the further recent allocations of public aid to banks and financial institutions, could consideration be given to a less restrictive approach to public aid for undertakings in the industrial sector?
Ali ne menite, da je zaradi množične selitve proizvodnje plovil v Azijo v interesu Skupnosti, da se poljskemu ladjedelskemu sektorju pomaga?
Given the large-scale transfer of shipbuilding to Asia, does the Commission not agree that assistance to the Polish shipbuilding industry would be in the interests of the Community?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0109/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0109/08
Zadeva: Kodeks ravnanja EU glede izvoza orožja - sprejeti je treba skupno stališče
Subject: EU Code of Conduct on arms exports; a common position must be adopted
Vseeno je to obljubilo, da bo v času svojega mandata spremenilo svoj odnos in ta proces dokončalo.
However, the French Presidency promised to change its attitude during its period in office and to complete the process.