natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Med in po konfliktu na Kosovu so srbska vojska in milica ter kasneje tolpe etničnih Albancev s požigi, množičnim uničevanjem hiš, uboji in posilstvi nasilno izgnali Aškale, Egipčane, Rome in Cigane, v nadaljevanju Rome, iz njihovih domov na Kosovu.
During the Kosovo conflict and in the aftermath thereof, Ashkalia, Egyptians, Roma, Gypsies, hereinafter referred to as 'Roma', were driven from their homes in Kosovo by of arson, the mass destruction of houses, killings and rape carried out by the Serb military and militias and, subsequently, by mobs of ethnic Albanians.
Od 150.000 Romov jih 30.000, ki so ostali na Kosovu, še vedno živi v taboriščih za notranje razseljene osebe (IDPs) pogosto v nečloveških razmerah, nekatere žrtve zastrupitev s svincem pa živijo v taboriščih okoli Mitrovice.
Out of 150 000 Roma, around 30 000 who remained in Kosovo still live in camps for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), often in inhuman conditions, some victims of lead poisoning in the camps around Mitrovica.
Odločitev nemške vlade o vrnitvi 38.000 romskih beguncev, ki trenutno živijo v Nemčiji, na področje, kjer Romom grozi zloraba človekovih pravic, lahko postane huda kršitev mednarodnih predpisov o statusu beguncev v času pred začetkom pogovorov o končnem statusu pokrajine.
The decision of the German Government to repatriate 38 000 Roma refugees currently residing in Germany to a region where Roma are subject to threats and human rights abuse will prove to be a blatant breach of international laws governing the status of refugees and was taken before the start of talks on the final status of the province.
Druge države EU razmišljajo o podobnih odločitvah.
Other EU countries are considering taking similar decisions.
Ali predsedstvo meni, da stanje človekovih pravic na Kosovu v zadostni meri zagotavlja obsežno in prisilno vrnitev romskih beguncev, dokler Romi še vedno živijo v taboriščih za notranje razseljene osebe?
Taking into account the human rights situation in Kosovo, does the Presidency consider that there are sufficient guarantees for the Romani refugees who are being forcibly repatriated while Roma continue to reside in camps for IDPs?
Bo Svet preučil, ali se pri prisilni vrnitvi romskih beguncev na Kosovo v celoti spoštuje načelo nevračanja?
Will the Council consider whether the principle of non-refoulement is being fully respected in the event of the forcible repatriation of Romani refugees to Kosovo?
Bo Svet sprejel nadaljnje ukrepe, ki bodo v bližnjih pogovorih o finančnem statusu pokrajine zagotovili upoštevanje pravic in stališč kosovskih Romov?
Will the Council take further measures to guarantee that the rights and views of the Kosovar Roma are taken into account in the forthcoming talks on the final status of the province?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0077/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0077/05
Ali Komisija meni, da stanje človekovih pravic na Kosovu v zadostni meri zagotavlja obsežno in prisilno vrnitev romskih beguncev, dokler Romi še vedno živijo v taboriščih za notranje razseljene osebe?
Taking into account the human rights situation in Kosovo, does the Commission consider that there are sufficient guarantees for the Romani refugees who are being forcibly repatriated while Roma continue to reside in camps for IDPs?
Bo Komisija preučila, ali se pri prisilni vrnitvi romskih beguncev na Kosovo v celoti spoštuje načelo nevračanja?
Will the Commission consider whether the principle of non-refoulement is being fully respected in the event of the forcible repatriation of Romani refugees to Kosovo?
Ali bo Komisija v splošno poročilo o razmerah na Kosovu vključila izjavo o Romih na Kosovu?
In its overall report on the situation in Kosovo, will the Commission include a statement on the Roma in Kosovo?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0078/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0078/05
Zadeva: Razvoj in šport
Subject: Development and sport
„Šport lahko igra pomembno vlogo pri spodbujanju razvoja.
'Sport can play a vital role in encouraging development.
Koristi prinaša tako posameznikom, ki se lahko udeležijo bolj zdravih dejavnosti, kot širši skupnosti, saj pogosto gradi boljše odnose.
Sport can bring benefits both to individuals, who can enjoy participating in healthier activities, and wider communities as it can often build better relations.
Šport lahko po zaslugi svoje sposobnosti globalnega znižanja stroškov na področju človeškega razvoja prispeva izredno pozitivno vrednost k mednarodnemu delu“ (Adolf Ogi, posebni svetovalec generalnega sekretarja Združenih narodov za šport za razvoj in mir, 9.3.2005).
Sports, thanks to global cost-cutting capacities in human development can add tremendous positive value to international work' (Adolf Ogi, the UN Secretary-General's Special Adviser on Sport for Development and Peace, 9.3.2005).
Leto 2005 je mednarodno leto ZN za šport in športno vzgojo.
2005 is the United Nations International Year of Sport and Physical Education.
Šport in športna vzgoja predstavljata sredstvo za spodbujanju izobraževanja, zdravja, razvoja in miru.
Sport and physical education are considered to be means to promote education, health, development and peace.
Eden od ciljev mednarodnega leta športa in športne vzgoje je ustvariti prave pogoje za bolj športno usmerjene razvojne programe in projekte.
One of the goals of the International Year is to create the right conditions for more sport-based development programmes and projects.
Na tem področju je dejavnih več držav, na primer Norveška, Kanada, Združeno kraljestvo in Nizozemska.
Several countries, for example Norway, Canada, United Kingdom and the Netherlands, are active in this field.
Športni projekti namreč lahko prispevajo k doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, zlasti na področju zdravja, izobraževanja, enakosti med spoloma, okolja in miru.
Sport projects apparently can contribute to reaching the MDGs, especially on themes like health, education, gender, environment and peace.
Ti projekti so poceni in učinkoviti.
They are also known as 'low-cost, high impact' projects.
Ali se Svet zaveda, da ZN spodbujajo države in mednarodne športne zveze k udejstvovanju na tem področju z nudenjem pomoči pri vzpostavljanju kadrov in zmogljivosti, saj priznavajo možni prispevek športa k socialni koheziji, medkulturnemu dialogu, razumevanju okolja, ponovnemu vključevanju otrok iz konfliktnih situacij, ter prispevek športne vzgoje h gospodarskemu in socialnemu razvoju?
Is the Council aware of the fact that the UN stimulates countries and international sports associations to be active in this field through assisting in capacity building, recognising the possible contribution of sport to social cohesion, intercultural dialogues, environmental understanding and re-integration of children in post-conflict situations and the contribution of sport education to economic and social development?
Je tudi Svet mnenja, da lahko šport in športna vzgoja prispevata k razvoju in doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja?
Does the Council share the opinion that sport and physical education can contribute to development and to reaching the MDGs?
Ali razmišlja tudi o (drugih) športno usmerjenih razvojnih programih in projektih?
Is the Council considering promoting sport-based development programmes and projects?
Ali lahko Svet podpre študijo o rezultatih projektov za razvoj in šport, ki jih že izvajajo razvojne in športne organizacije, o možnosti vzpostavitve politike na tem področju in morebitne vloge EU in/ali držav članic in/ali NVO na področju razvoja in športa?
Can the Council stimulate a study on the results of projects that have been realised by development organisations and sport organisations on development and sport, the potential of policy in this field and the possible role for the EU and/or the Member States and/or NGOs on development and sport?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O O-0079/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0079/05
Šport in športna vzgoja predstavljata sredstvo za spodbujanje izobraževanja, zdravja, razvoja in miru.
Sport and physical education are considered to be means to promote education, health, development and peace.
Ali se Komisija zaveda, da ZN spodbujajo države in mednarodne športne zveze k udejstvovanju na tem področju z nudenjem pomoči pri vzpostavljanju kadrov in zmogljivosti, saj priznavajo možni prispevek športa k socialni koheziji, medkulturnemu dialogu, razumevanju okolja, ponovnemu vključevanju otrok iz konfliktnih situacij, ter prispevek športne vzgoje h gospodarskemu in socialnemu razvoju?
Is the Commission aware of the fact that the UN stimulates countries and international sports associations to be active in this field through assisting in capacity-building, recognising the possible contribution of sport to social cohesion, intercultural dialogue, environmental understanding and re-integration of children in post-conflict situations and the contribution of sport education to economic and social development?
Je tudi Komisija mnenja, da lahko šport in športna vzgoja prispevata k razvoju in doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja?
Does the Commission share the opinion that sport and physical education can contribute to development and to reaching the MDGs?
Ali ima izkušnje s programi za šport in razvoj?
Has the Commission experience with programmes on sport and development?
Ali razmišlja tudi o (drugih) športno usmerjenih razvojnih programih in projektih?
Is the Commission considering (other) sport-based development programmes and projects?
Ali lahko Komisija podpre študijo o rezultatih projektov za razvoj in šport, ki jih že izvajajo razvojne in športne organizacije, o možnosti vzpostavitve politike na tem področju in morebitne vloge EU in/ali držav članic in/ali NVO na področju razvoja in športa?
Can the Commission stimulate a study on the results of projects that have been realised by development-organisations and sport-organisations on development and sport, the potential of policy in this field and the possible role for the EU and/or the Member States and/or NGOs on development and sport?
Ali bi Komisija lahko preučila možnost oblikovanja proračuna za projekte in programe za šport in razvoj?
Finally, could the Commission consider an earmarked budget for sport in development projects and programmes?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0080/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0080/05
Zadeva: Invalidnost in razvoj
Subject: Disability and development
Kako Komisija izvaja svoje smernice za invalidnost in razvoj?
How is the Commission implementing its Guidance Note on Disability and Development?
Kako namerava vključiti invalidnost, vključno s pravicami invalidnih oseb, v razvojne politike in prakso EU?
How does it intend to mainstream disability, including the rights of people with disabilities, into EU development policies and practice?
Ali je Komisija predvidela posebne programe na področju preventive, oskrbe, rehabilitacije in stigmatizacije?
Does it have specific programmes to tackle prevention, care, enablement and stigma?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0081/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0081/05
Zadeva: Sporazum o vinogradništvu med ZDA in EU
Subject: Viticultural agreement EU - USA
ZDA imajo od leta 1984 ugodnejšo obravnavo pri izvozu vina v EU.
The USA has been granted preferential treatment with regard to the export of wine to the EU since 1984.
Komisija je pred kratkim dosegla sporazum s to državo, s katerim začasne koncesije, ki ji jih je EU v zadnjih dvajsetih letih dodelila za enološke postopke, postanejo stalne.
The Commission has just negotiated with the US an agreement which makes permanent the temporary concessions granted by the EU to the US over the last 20 years with regard to oenological practices.
V skladu z načelom STO o državi z največjimi ugodnostmi bi posebni pogoji, ki bi jih EU določila za ZDA, morali v enaki meri veljati tudi za druge članice STO.
In accordance with the WTO most-favoured nation treatment principle, any special conditions granted to the USA by the EU will have to be applied equally to the other WTO member nations.
Po grožnjah ZDA, da bodo omejile izvoz vin iz EU, je Komisija nazadnje sprejela sporazum, s katerim je zagotovila le majhno zavezanost ZDA v zameno za opustitev označb Skupnosti v prihodnje.
Following American threats to impose restrictions on exports of EU wines, the Commission finally concluded an agreement whereby it secured only a vague commitment by the United States in exchange for abandoning Community appellations in future.
ZDA so se strinjale, da bodo popustile zahtevam Skupnosti, vendar le, ko so bili dovoljeni drugi enološki postopki, za katere doslej ni bilo posebnih oprostitev.
The US agreed that it would eventually accede to Community demands, but only after other oenological practices which have not hitherto been subject to any special dispensation were allowed.
V ZDA trenutno 17 geografskih označb Skupnosti velja za polgenerična imena izdelkov, novi sporazum pa ohranja dosedanje stanje kljub dodani vrednosti, ki jih označbe predstavljajo za proizvajalce Skupnosti.
At present, 17 Community geographical indications are regarded as semi-generic product names in the United States, and the new agreement maintains the status quo despite the added value which these appellations represent for Community producers.´
Kako bo Komisija preprečila sporazum, ki bi postal precedens za prihodnje sporazume o vinogradništvu s tretjimi državami, kot sta Indija in Kitajska, ki bi lahko uveljavljale določbo o državi z največjimi ugodnostmi?
How will the Commission prevent an agreement of this kind establishing a precedent for future viticultural agreements with third countries, such as India and China, which could demand that the most-favoured-nation clause be applied?
Bi morala EU glede na predlog sprejeti ameriške enološke postopke, čeprav se dobro zaveda, da v EU veljajo strogi predpisi, ki se včasih močno razlikujejo od tistih v ZDA?
According to the proposal, should the EU have to accept US oenological practices, in the full knowledge that the EU has strict European regulations, which at times differ greatly from those in the USA?
Kakšno strategijo bo Komisija uporabila na pogajanjih v Hongkongu?
What strategy does the Commission intend to pursue during negotiations in Hong Kong?
Kako namerava Komisija v praksi zaščititi evropske geografske označbe v EU in drugod po svetu?
How, in practice, does the Commission intend to guarantee the protection of European geographical indications in the EU and in the rest of the world?
Bodo ZDA v EU lahko še naprej izvažale vino s tradicionalnimi imeni, kot so "chateau", "clos", "ruby", "tawny" in "classic", ne da bi jim bilo treba izpolnjevati nekaterih standardov za proizvodnjo in trženje, ki jih EU zahteva za svoja vina?
Will the USA continue to be able to export wines to the EU bearing traditional terms such as ‘Chateau’, ‘Clos’, ‘Ruby’, ‘Tawny’ and ‘Classic’ without having to comply with certain production or marketing standards as required by the EU for EU wines?
Ali je res, da je bila v zvezi z polgeneričnimi imeni dogovorjena le določba o dosedanjem stanju in da bodo nekatera imena, kot je "šampanjec", lahko še naprej uporabljali v ZDA?
Is it correct that as regards semi-generic terms only a status-quo clause has been agreed on and that certain terms such as "Champagne" will continue to be allowed to be used in the USA?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0082/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0082/05
Zadeva: Odnos EU do kubanske vlade
Subject: EU policy towards the Cuban Government
Za Evropski parlament ostaja nepredstavljivo, da morajo ljudje na Kubi še vedno v zapor zaradi svojih idealov in mirne politične dejavnosti.
For the EP, it remains inconceivable that people can continue to be imprisoned in Cuba for their ideals and for pursuing peaceful political activities.
Zlasti nesprejemljivo in nezaslišano je, da nekateri od teh političnih zapornikov ne dobijo potrebne pomoči in so v zelo slabem zdravstvenem stanju.
It is particularly unacceptable and shocking that some of these political prisoners are not receiving the help that they need and are in very poor medical health.
Nekateri celo umirajo.
Some of them are actually dying.
Evropski parlament je v skladu s svojim dosedanjim trdnim stališčem v svoji resoluciji novembra 2004 poudaril, da predstavlja zagotavljanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin bistven pogoj za spremembo skupnega stališča Evropske unije o Kubi in spremembo ukrepov, sprejetih soglasno 5. junija 2003 (tj. sankcij, uvedenih po odvzemu prostosti in zaprtju 75 disidentov ter kasnejši usmrtitvi treh ugrabiteljev letal).
In line with its former firm positions, the EP stressed, in its resolution of November 2004, that '..... and the upholding of human rights and fundamental freedoms are essential conditions for any revision of the EU's Common Position on Cuba and the measures adopted unanimously on 5 June 2003' (i.e. sanctions imposed following the arrest and imprisonment of 75 dissidents and the subsequent summary execution of three hijackers).
Nasprotno, položaj človekovih pravic se je poslabšal.
On the contrary, the human rights situation has deteriorated.
Svet je v svoji izjavi z dne 13. junija 2005 navedel, da ni zadovoljivega napredka v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami na Kubi.
In its declaration of 13 June 2005, the Council states that 'there was no satisfactory progress on human rights in Cuba'.
Kljub temu je sklenil, da se ukrepi, sprejeti 5. junija 2005, še naprej začasno ne izvajajo.
It nevertheless concludes that 'the measures taken on 5 June 2003 remain suspended'.
Katere pobude bo britansko predsedstvo sprejelo z namenom spodbujanja spoštovanja človekovih pravic in resničnega napredka na poti k pluralistični demokraciji na Kubi?
What kind of initiatives is the UK Presidency willing to take in order to promote respect for human rights and real progress towards a pluralist democracy in Cuba?
Ali Svet po nedavnih dogodkih (izgon evropskih poslancev, nenehno zatiranje disidentov) še vedno meni, da so rezultati nove politike zadovoljivi in da je sedanja politika do kubanskih oblasti pravi pristop k izboljšanju razmer na Kubi?
After recent events (expulsion of European parliamentarians, ongoing repression of dissidents), does the Council still think that the results of its new policy are satisfactory and that its present policy towards the Cuban authorities is the correct approach for improving the situation in Cuba?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0083/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0083/05
Zadeva: Prehod na digitalno oddajanje
Subject: Digital switchover
Prehod iz analognega na digitalno oddajanje bo prineslo koristi na vseh ravneh.
The transition from analogue to digital broadcasting will bring benefits at all level.
Povezan je tudi z lizbonsko strategijo, ki poudarja pomen dostopnosti frekvenc za pospešitev inovacij v informacijski in komunikacijski tehnologiji.
It also forms part of the Lisbon Agenda, which highlights the importance of spectrum availability to boost innovation in ICT.
Komisija za skupni zastavljeni datum predlaga leto 2012, ko naj bi odklopili zemeljsko analogno oddajanje, z vidika regionalne radiokomunikacijske konference leta 2006 in svetovne radiokomunikacijske konference leta 2007 pa zahteva bolj fleksibilno uporabo nekdanjih analognih valov.
The Commission proposes 2012 as a common target date for switching off analogue terrestrial broadcasting and, with a view to the Regional Radiocommunication Conference and the World Radiocommunication Conference in 2006 and 2007 respectively, calls for the flexible use of the former analogue bands.
Ali Komisija meni, da je leto 2012 kot zastavljeni datum za izklop izvedljiv?
What is the Commission's opinion: is the 2012 switch-off date feasible?
Ali je pred zastavljenim datumom za izklop možno zagotoviti, da bodo odstranjene motnje analognih kanalov, ki prenašajo zunaj Evropske unije?
Can we be sure that, close to the target switch-off date interference from analogue channels transmitting from outside the European Union will be eliminated?
Na kakšen način naj se pristopi k načrtovanju regionalne radiokomunikacijske konference, da bi obdržali ravnovesje z skupnim trgom in razvojno politiko?
How must the RRC planning approach be presented in order to maintain a balance with the common market and policy development?
Ali bo Komisija poleg oddajanja na vseevropski ravni prevzela vodilno vlogo za začetek raziskav in razvoja na področju novih in inovativnih storitev?
Will the Commission play a leading role in initiating the research and development relating to new and innovative services other than broadcasting at a pan-European level?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0084/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0084/05
Zadeva: Olimpijsko premirje
Subject: Olympic truce
Pred olimpijskimi in paraolimpijskimi igrami 2004 v Atenah je Mednarodni olimpijski komite ustanovil mednarodno ustanovo za olimpijsko premirje, imenovano International Olympic Truce Foundation, in mednarodni center, International Olympic Truce Centre, ki naj bi oživila idejo olimpijskega premirja.
Prior to the Olympic and Paralympic Games 2004 in Athens, the International Olympic Committee established an International Olympic Truce Foundation and an International Olympic Truce Centre to revive the idea of the Olympic Truce.
S tradicijo premirja, ki sega nazaj v čas starodavnih grških olimpijskih iger in ki so jo spoštovali več kot dvanajst stoletij, je bilo doseženo prenehanje vseh sovražnosti v času iger in prinašala je sporočilo miru.
The tradition of a Truce, which dates back to the ancient Hellenic Olympic Games and which was observed for more than twelve centuries, entailed a cessation of all hostilities during the Games and conveyed a message of peace.
Ustanova in center za premirje sta nastala z namenom, da bi razpravljala o reševanju sporov in poudarjala vlogo športa v družbi.
The Foundation and Truce Centre were set up to discuss conflict resolution and to emphasise the role of sport in society.
V svoji resoluciji P5_TA(2004)0270 z dne 1. aprila 2004 je Evropski parlament pozval Svet, naj podpre prizadevanja Mednarodnega olimpijskega komiteja pri spodbujanju idealov miru in razumevanja med ljudmi skozi šport.
In its resolution P5_TA(2004)0270 of 1 April 2004, the European Parliament called on the Council to support the efforts of the International Olympic Committee to promote the ideals of peace and human understanding through sport.
Evropski parlament je tudi priporočil Svetu, naj to temo obravnava vsaki dve leti, pred vsakimi letnimi in zimskimi olimpijskimi igrami, in svojo podporo pobudi za olimpijsko premirje še enkrat potrdi pred igrami v Torinu v Italiji februarja 2006.
The European Parliament also urged the Council to reconsider this matter every two years, prior to all Summer and Winter Olympic Games, and to reaffirm its support for the Olympic Truce initiative before the Games to be held in Turin, Italy, in February 2006.
Ali bo Svet ponovno potrdil svojo podporo olimpijskemu premirju med zimskimi olimpijskimi in paraolimpijskimi igrami v Torinu?
Will the Council confirm its support for an Olympic Truce during the Turin Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games?
Kaj konkretnega bo ukrenil, da bo zagotovljeno spoštovanje olimpijskega premirja?
What tangible steps will it take to ensure that the Olympic Truce is observed?
Ali bo Svet pozval vse države članice, države kandidatke in sosednje države ter vse države, ki sodelujejo na olimpijskih igrah, naj spoštujejo olimpijsko premirje med zimskimi olimpijskimi in paraolimpijskimi igrami in tudi pozneje?
Will the Council invite all Member States, applicant and neighbouring countries, and all countries participating in the Olympic Games to respect and observe the Olympic Truce during the Winter 2006 Olympics and Paralympics and thereafter?
UL C 103 E, 29.4.2004, str.
OJ C 103 E, 29.4.2004, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0085/05/rev.2
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0085/05/rev.2
Zadeva: Uporaba kazenskih sankcij v primeru kršitev prava Skupnosti
Subject: Imposition of criminal penalties in the event of an infringement of Community law