natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V zgoraj omenjenem sporočilu (KOM(2003)0284 končno) je Komisija napovedala, da je njen kratkoročni namen podati zakonodajni predlog o štirinajsti direktivi na področju prva družb med letoma 2003 in 2005.
In its above mentioned Communication (COM(2003)0284 final), the Commission announced a forthcoming legislative proposal on the Fourteenth Company Law Directive (the directive) as a short term project between 2003 and 2005.
V resoluciji P6_(2006)0295 o nedavnem razvoju dogodkov in nadaljnjih možnostih v zvezi s pravom družb (4. julij 2006) je Parlament pozval Komisijo, da v bližnji prihodnosti predstavi predlog direktive in je poudaril, da bi težko pričakovana direktiva zapolnila vrzel v sistemu notranjega trga za družbe.
In the resolution P6_(2006)0295 on recent developments and prospects in relation to company law (4 July 2006), Parliament calls on the Commission to present in the near future a proposal for the directive and stresses that the long-awaited directive would fill a lacuna in the system of the internal market for companies.
Komisija še ni predložila predloga direktive.
As yet, the Commission has not offered any proposal for the directive.
Kakšno je trenutno stanje priprav zakonodajnega predloga o statutu evropske družbe v zasebni lasti in o štirinajsti direktivi na področju prava družb?
What is the current state of play in the preparation of the legislative proposals on the Statute of the European Private Company and on the Fourteenth Company Law Directive?
Katere bistvene težave v vsaki od teh zadev povzročajo, da Komisija zamuja s temi postopki?
What are the substantive problems in each of the dossiers which are making the Commission delay these procedures?
Katere druge težave obstajajo, poleg bistvenih, zaradi katerih Komisija okleva?
What problems other than substantive ones exist and are making the Commission hesitate?
Ali Komisija sploh še zasleduje cilj dokončanja notranjega trga za vse družbe in ali jemlje to odgovornost resno?
Is the Commission still pursuing its task of completing the Internal Market for companies at all, and does it take this responsibility seriously?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0043/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0043/07
Zadeva: Izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 717/2007 o gostovanju v javnih mobilnih telefonskih omrežjih, zlasti glede obravnave novih uporabnikov
Subject: Implementation of Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 on Roaming on Public Mobile Telephone Networks with special regard to the treatment of new customers
Uredba (ES) št. 717/2007 o gostovanju v javnih mobilnih telefonskih omrežjih je začela veljati 30. junija 2007.
Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 on Roaming on Public Mobile Networks entered into force on 30 June 2007.
Njen cilj je spodbujati konkurenčnost in znižati telefonske pristojbine za gostovanje v Skupnosti na primerno cenovno raven.
This Regulation aims at fostering competition and bringing down phone charges for Community-wide roaming calls to a reasonable price level.
Sprejeta je bila v rekordnih enajstih mesecih, saj je bil skupni cilj Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, da bodo državljani EU ugodnosti te uredbe, torej nižje cene in večjo preglednost, lahko izkoristili že med poletnimi počitnicami.
The Regulation, adopted in a record time of 11 months as the shared objective of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, was to deliver the benefits of this Regulation – cheaper prices and increased transparency – to EU citizens in time for the summer holidays.
Uredba obvezuje mobilne operaterje v vsej EU, da uporabnikom ponudijo in zagotovijo tarife gostovanj, ki ne bodo presegale v njej določenih zgornjih mejnih cen.
The Regulation obliges mobile operators throughout the EU to offer and provide their customers with a roaming tariff not exceeding the defined price caps.
Da bi operaterjem olajšali interno poslovanje v zvezi s spremembami pogodb ali pogojev za obračun stroškov pri obstoječih uporabnikih, imajo na voljo prehodno obdobje treh mesecev, da vsem uporabnikom gostovanja, ki to želijo, ponudijo regulirano tarifo.
In order to facilitate operators' internal administration activities linked to the change of contracts or charging conditions of existing customers, they were granted a maximum transition period of three months to provide all existing roaming customers with regulated roaming tariffs should they wish to.
Za nove uporabnike, torej tiste, ki so ali bodo sklenili naročniško razmerje po 30. juniju 2007, prehodno obdobje tehnično ni potrebno, ker z njimi ni dodatnih upravnih stroškov, in zato ni bilo vključeno v uredbo.
For new customers, meaning customers who take out a new subscription after 30 June 2007, the transition period is technically not necessary as no administration overheads are involved, and it was therefore not included in the Regulation.
Kljub vsemu se zdi, da imajo Komisija in nacionalni regulatorni organi pomisleke glede tega, kako naj bi se obravnavale nove stranke.
Despite all this, the Commission and the national regulatory agencies seem to have doubts regarding the treatment to be accorded to new customers.
Skupina evropskih regulatorjev kljub temu, da je to napovedala, še ni izdala smernic za mobilne operaterje, kako naj izvajajo uredbo v primeru novih strank, novim uporabnikom v vsej EU pa je kratena pravica do reguliranih gostujočih klicev.
The European Regulators Group has not, as announced, yet issued guidance to the operators on how to implement the Regulation regarding new customers, and new customers across the EU are being deprived of their right of regulated roaming calls.
Zakaj ima Komisija pravne pomisleke glede tega, kako obravnavati nove stranke?
On what grounds does the Commission have legal doubts regarding the treatment to be accorded to new customers?
Ali je o tem prosila za mnenje svojo pravno službo?
Has the Commission asked its Legal Service to provide an opinion on this?
Koliko mobilnih operaterjev v vsej EU je od 30. junija 2007 ponudilo novim strankam evropsko tarifo?
How many mobile operators across the EU have been offering a Eurotariff for new customers since 30 June 2007?
Kako namerava Komisija odpraviti negotovost glede tega, kako naj bi mobilni operaterji obravnavali nove stranke?
How does the Commission intend to dissipate the uncertainties regarding the treatment of new customers by mobile operators?
Kako namerava glede na nezadostno obveščenost odpraviti to pomanjkljivost in zagotoviti, da se bodo uporabniki v EU začeli zavedati pravic, ki jih imajo kot novi uporabniki?
In view of this insufficient information, how does the Commission intend to overcome this failure and ensure that EU customers become aware of their rights as new customers?
Kako namerava Komisija odslej uveljavljati določbo, da mora biti vsem uporabnikom v EU ob sklenitvi novega naročniškega razmerja na voljo evropska tarifa?
How does the Commission from now on intend to enforce availability of a Eurotariff to all EU customers when they take out a new subscription?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0044/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0044/07
Zadeva: Evropska skupina za ozemeljsko sodelovanje
Subject: European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)
Evropska skupina za ozemeljsko sodelovanje je bila ustanovljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1082/2006 z dne 5. julija 2006.
The European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation was established by Regulation 1082/2006 of 5 July 2006.
Glavna naloga te nove pravne osebe v pravnem redu Skupnosti je spodbujanje čezmejnega, transnacionalnega in/ali medregionalnega sodelovanja med njenimi članicami, katerega izključni cilj je krepitev gospodarske in družbene kohezije, torej enega temeljnih načel pogodb.
This new legal entity under Community law is designed to promote cross-border, transnational and/or interregional cooperation, with the exclusive aim of strengthening economic and social cohesion, which is to say one of the fundamental principles of the Treaties.
V teh skupinah lahko sodelujejo vse države članice, regionalne in regijske oblasti ter osebe javnega prava, ki so naštete v seznamu priloge III direktive 2004/18/ES z dne 31. marca 2004, kar predstavlja ogromno število potencialnih evropskih skupin v zelo različnih okoljih.
All Member States, regional authorities, local authorities and bodies governed by public law listed in Annex III to Directive 2004/18/EC of 31 March 2004 may participate in these groupings, making for a huge number of potential European groupings in a wide array of fields.
Glavna novost te uredbe je, da tej vrsti skupin daje status pravnega subjekta, kar ima že samo po sebi veliko vrednost, saj omogoča delovanje in razvoj sodelovanja znotraj Unije.
The main development in this Regulation is that it confers legal personality on groupings of this type, which is of value in itself in that it facilitates the operability and development of cooperation within the Union.
Poleg tega skupine ne bodo nujno sofinancirane iz sredstev Skupnosti, kar povečuje razpoložljivost sredstev.
Furthermore, such groupings will not necessarily receive Community cofinancing, thereby making more cofinancing generally available.
Pred začetkom izvajanja uredbe morajo države članice najkasneje do 1. avgusta 2007 sprejeti vse ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev učinkovitega izvajanja v skladu s členoma 16 in 18 te uredbe.
With a view to implementing this Regulation, Member States are required by Articles 16 and 18 thereof to make such provisions as are appropriate to ensure its effective application by 1 August at the latest.
Na žalost ugotavljamo, da do danes države članice niso prilagodile svoje zakonodaje, niti sprejele ustreznih ukrepov, ki bi omogočili izvajanje uredbe, zato je nemogoče, da bi ta uredba 1. avgusta 2007 začela veljati v vseh državah članicah.
We must unfortunately note that to date the Member States have not adapted their bodies of law or taken the relevant measures with a view to enabling that application, and that it will therefore be impossible for this Regulation to be applicable in each Member State on 1 August 2007.
Kakšne ukrepe je sprejel Svet glede na ogromen neuspeh držav članic, da bi spoštovale zakonodajo Skupnosti, in glede na finančne posledice, ki so prizadele predvsem nove države članice?
In view of this blatant failure by the Member States to respect Community legislation, and the financial prejudice this has occasioned to those affected, especially the new Member States, what measures is the Council taking to rectify this situation?
UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str.
19 OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0045/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0045/07
Glavna naloga te nove pravne osebe v pravnem redu Skupnosti je spodbujanje čezmejnega, transnacionalnega in/ali medregionalnega sodelovanja med njenimi članicami, katere izključni cilj je krepitev gospodarske in družbene kohezije, torej enega temeljnih načel pogodb.
This new legal entity under Community law is designed to promote cross-border, transnational and/or interregional cooperation, with the exclusive aim of strengthening economic and social cohesion, which is to say one of the fundamental principles of the Treaties.
V teh skupinah lahko sodelujejo vse države članice, regionalne in lokalne oblasti ter osebe javnega prava, ki so naštete v seznamu priloge III direktive 2004/18/ES z dne 31. marca 2004, kar predstavlja ogromno število potencialnih evropskih skupin v zelo različnih okoljih.
All Member States, regional authorities, local authorities and bodies governed by public law listed in Annex III to Directive 2004/18/EC of 31 March 2004 may participate in these groupings, making for a huge number of potential European groupings in a wide array of fields.
Glavna novost te uredbe je, da tej vrsti skupin daje status pravne osebe, kar ima že samo po sebi veliko vrednost, saj omogoča delovanje in razvoj sodelovanja znotraj Unije.
The main development in this Regulation is that it confers legal personality on groupings of this type, which is of value in itself in that it facilitates the operability and development of cooperation within the Union.
Kakšne ukrepe je sprejela Komisija glede na ogromen neuspeh držav članic, da bi spoštovale zakonodajo Skupnosti, in glede na finančne posledice, ki so prizadele predvsem nove države članice?
In view of this blatant failure by the Member States to respect Community legislation, and the financial prejudice this has occasioned to those affected, especially the new Member States, what measures is the Commission taking to rectify this situation?
Bo Komisija sprožila postopek iz člena 216, glede na to, da je odgovorna za zagotavljanje izpolnjevanja obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz pogodb?
Bearing in mind that it is incumbent on the Commission to ensure compliance with obligations under the Treaties, will it initiate the procedure provided for in Article 216?
UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.19.
OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0046/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0046/07
Po 9/11, 3/11 in londonskih bombnih eksplozijah je EU sprejela protiteroristično strategijo EU in akcijski načrt EU za boj proti terorizmu, okvirni sklep o terorizmu in več pobud za boljše usklajevanje med državami članicami samimi ter med državami članicami in evropskimi institucijami ob podpori koordinatorja EU za boj proti terorizmu.
Since 9-11, 3-11 and the London bombings, the EU has adopted an EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy, an EU Counter-Terrorism Action Plan, a Framework Decision on terrorism and several initiatives to strengthen the coordination between the Member States and between the latter and the European Institutions with the support of the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator.
Na medinstitucionalni ravni EP uradno ni bil vključen v dogajanje, vendar je leta 2006 Svet začel 'politični dialog na visoki ravni o boju proti terorizmu med glavnimi evropskimi institucijami, vključenimi v boj proti terorizmu' in s tem poudaril pomen demokratične odgovornosti.
At interinstitutional level there was no formal involvement of the EP but in 2006 the Council launched the 'High-Level Political Dialogue on Counter-Terrorism between the main European Institutions involved in the fight against terrorism', highlighting the importance of democratic accountability.
Na upravni ravni sta bili dve strokovni presoji med državami članicami o izvajanju strategije Evropske unije že opravljeni, Europol, Eurojust in SITCEN pa so pred kratkim začeli s svojo oceno razvoja ogroženosti na evropski ravni.
At administrative level there have already been two peer evaluations between the Member States on the implementation of the European Union Strategy, and Europol, Eurojust and SITCEN have just started their assessment of the evolution of the threat at European level.
Zdaj se zdi, da je ne glede na vse zgoraj omenjene pobude EU od takrat doživela številne poskuse terorističnih napadov, zaradi česar se zastavlja vrsta vprašanj:
Now it appears that, notwithstanding all the initiatives cited above, the EU has since experienced a number of attempted terrorist attacks, which gives rise to a number of questions:
Ali namerava Evropski svet, z vključitvijo Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov, izvesti celovito oceno vseh protiterorističnih ukrepov, ki so bili sprejeti do sedaj, kot tudi oceno njihove učinkovitosti in izvajanja s strani držav članic?
Does the European Council intend to carry out, with the involvement of the European Parliament and of the national parliaments, a comprehensive evaluation of all counter-terrorism measures adopted until now as well as an assessment of their effectiveness and level of implementation by Member States?
Kako bodo vključene države članice?
And how will Member States be associated?
Kako namerava Svet odpraviti pomanjkljivosti, označene v zadnjem poročilu Europol-SITCEN o terorizmu, ter se odzvati na odgovore držav članic na vprašalnik Eurojust iz leta 2006 o izvajanju okvirnega sklepa o terorizmu?
How does the Council intend to overcome the shortcomings raised in the last Europol-SITCEN report on terrorism and take stock of the MS replies to the 2006 Eurojust questionnaire on the implementation of the Framework Decision on terrorism?
Kateri drugi ukrepi so bili sprejeti, vendar ne pravilno izvedeni, kdo jih ni pravilno izvedel in zakaj ne?
Which other measures have been adopted but not correctly implemented by whom and for which reasons ?
Ali se bo Svet zdaj osredotočil na izvajanje trenutnih ukrepov, ali pa se pripravljajo kakšni novi predlogi ukrepov?
Will the Council now focus on the implementation of the current measures, or are there any current proposals in the pipeline?
Kako Svet ocenjuje izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami in Evropsko unijo v tem oziru?
How does the Council evaluate the information sharing between Member States and the European Union in this context?
Ali bi se Svet strinjal, da je potrebno večje vzajemno zaupanje med organi EU in službami držav članic za kazenski pregon in boj proti terorizmu?
Would the Council agree that greater mutual trust is needed between EU authorities and Member States' law enforcement and counter-terrorism services?
Kakšno vlogo je Svet namenil obveščevalnim informacijam, kakšen pravni okvir je predviden za to in kakšno vlogo bo imel SITCEN kot orodje za nadzor in usklajevanje terorističnih preiskav?
What role does the Council intend to assign to the intelligence information, what legal framework is foreseen for these formations and what role is to be given to SITCEN as a monitoring and coordinating tool in terrorist investigations?
Ali Svet glede na odstop g. de Vriesa februarja 2007 meni, da je treba obdržati mesto koordinatorja EU za boj proti terorizmu in s kakšnim mandatom?
Considering the resignation of Mr de Vries in February 2007, does the Council consider that the role of the EU counter-terrorism Coordinator should be maintained and, if so, with what mandate?
Ali obstajajo za ta odstop razlogi, ki zadevajo prekrivanje pristojnosti koordinatorja EU za boj proti terorizmu in SITCEN?
Are there reasons for the resignation which have to do with the overlap of competencies between the EU coordinator for counter-terrorism and SITCEN?
Kako namerava Svet okrepiti sprejemanje protiteroristične strategije s strani državljanov EU, preglednost in demokratično odgovornost ter sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta?
How does the Council intend to strengthen EU citizens' acceptance of the antiterrorism strategy, its transparency and democratic accountability and the involvement of the European Parliament?
Ali bo Svet zagotovil spoštovanje člena 6 PEU?
Will the Council ensure respect for Art. 6 of the TEU?
Kar zadeva vpletenost tretjih držav, kako namerava portugalsko predsedstvo razvijati čezatlantsko sodelovanje v boju proti terorizmu in kriminalu po vrhu EU-ZDA aprila 2007, in ali ga bo razvijalo z metodami, ki bodo skladne s členom 6 PEU in s predvidenimi dogodki na naslednji medvladni konferenci, kot priporoča tudi resolucija EU o domnevni uporabi evropskih držav za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje ujetnikov s strani ameriške obveščevalne agencije CIA?
As regards the involvement of third countries, following the EU-US summit in April 2007, how does the Portuguese Presidency intend to develop transatlantic cooperation to combat terrorism and crime, and will it be pursued through methods which comply with Art. 6 of the TEU and with foreseeable developments in the next IGC, as recommended also by the EP resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0048/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0048/07
Zadeva: Mednarodni sporazum o prepovedi kasetnega streliva, nadgradnja deklaracije iz Osla
Subject: International treaty to ban cluster munitions; follow-up to the Oslo Declaration
Od sprejetja deklaracije iz Osla dne 23. februarja 2007, ki je pozvala k mednarodnemu sporazumu o prepovedi kasetnega streliva po svetu, in nadaljnje konference o kasetnem strelivu, ki je potekala 24. in 25. maja 2007 v Limi, se je okrog 80 držav odločilo podpreti proces, ki bi privedel do takšnega sporazuma, med njimi skoraj vse države članice EU.
Since the adoption of the Oslo Declaration on 23 February 2007 calling for an international treaty to ban cluster munitions globally and the follow-up Lima conference on cluster munitions which took place on 24-25 May 2007, some 80 States have decided to support the process leading to such a treaty, including almost all the EU Member States.
Na to temo bo oktobra 2007 bo v Belgiji potekalo regionalno srečanje na visoki ravni.
Belgium will host a high-level regional meeting on this issue at the end of October 2007.
Srečanjema v Oslu in Limi bo decembra sledila tretja svetovna konferenca na Dunaju.
In December there will be a third global conference in Vienna, following up the Oslo and Lima meetings.
Kakšne pobude je Svet sprejel za nadgradnjo prejšnjih resolucij Parlamenta v podporo procesu iz Osla, zlasti resolucije o Konvenciji o prepovedi biološkega in toksičnega orožja, o kasetnih bombah in klasičnem orožju P6_TA(2006)0493 z dne 16. novembra 2006, v kateri poziva EU k podpori pobude „za vzpostavitev celovite in učinkovite konvencije za prepoved kasetnega streliva po vsem svetu“?
What initiatives has the Council taken to follow up Parliament’s previous resolutions supporting the Oslo process, in particular the resolution of 16 November 2006 on the Convention on the Prohibition of Biological and Toxin Weapons (BTWC), cluster bombs and conventional arms ( P6_TA(2006)0493 ), in which it asks the EU to support the initiative ‘to establish a comprehensive and effective convention to ban cluster munitions worldwide’?
Ali namerava Svet sodelovati na srečanjih v Bruslju in na Dunaju in kakšni bodo njegovi prispevki na teh srečanjih?
Is the Council planning to participate in both the Brussels and the Vienna meetings and what contributions will the Council make at these meetings?
Bo Svet pripravil skupno stališče kot osnovo za te prispevke?
Will the Council prepare a Common Position as the basis for these contributions?
Kakšne pobude je Svet sprejel za zagotovitev, da bodo različne države članice glede prepovedi kasetnih bomb sledile zgledu Avstrije in Belgije, in na mednarodni ravni za zagotovitev, da bodo tiste države, ki še niso podpisale deklaracije iz Osla, to sedaj storile, kot zahteva Parlament v svoji resoluciji o človekovih pravicah po svetu v letu 2006 in politiki EU na tem področju, sprejeti 26. aprila 2007?
What initiatives has the Council taken to ensure that the various Member States follow the example of Austria and Belgium in banning cluster bombs and, at international level, to ensure that those countries which have not yet signed the Oslo Declaration now do so, as requested by Parliament in its resolution on human rights in the world 2006 and the EU’s policy on the matter, adopted on 26 April 2007?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0049/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0049/07
Zadeva: Cilji konference pogodbenic konvencije o boju proti dezertifikaciji, ki bo od 3. do 14. septembra 2007 v Madridu
Subject: Objectives for the Conference of the Parties to the Convention to Combat Desertification to be held in Madrid, 3-14 September 2007
Ali lahko Svet pojasni cilje Evropske unije na bližnjem osmem zasedanju konference pogodbenic konvencije Združenih narodov o boju proti dezertifikaciji, ki bo od 3. do 14. septembra 2007 v Madridu v Španiji?
Can the Council explain the objectives for the European Union at the forthcoming eighth session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (COP 8) that will be held in Madrid, Spain, from 3 to 14 September 2007?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0051/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0051/07