natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar pa je njen bruto domači proizvod v letošnjem tretjem četrtletju v primerjavi z istim četrtletjem preteklega leta znova padel za 14,3 %.
However, the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) fell in the third quarter of this year by a further 14.3% compared with the third quarter of last year.
Predvideva se, da bo BDP v Litvi letos nazadoval za 20 %.
It is predicted that Lithuania’s GDP will fall by 20% this year.
Zato ni videti znakov gospodarske stabilizacije te države, kakršni se kažejo v preostalem delu Evrope.
Thus we are not seeing the same evidence of economic stabilisation in Lithuania as in the rest of Europe.
Kako bi lahko Komisija pomagala državam Evropske unije, tako tudi Litvi, ki jih je kriza močneje prizadela?
How could the Commission help EU countries shaken by the crisis, including Lithuania?
Kateri dodatne ukrepe predlaga Komisija za ohranitev in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest v proizvodni in predelovalni industriji?
What additional measures does the Commission propose to take with a view to safeguarding and creating jobs in the industrial and manufacturing sector?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0394/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0394/09
Zadeva: Člen 41(3) Lizbonske pogodbe, zagonski sklad
Subject: Treaty of Lisbon, Article 41(3), start-up fund
Kako bo sprejetje Lizbonske pogodbe vplivalo na pristojnost nadzora nad proračunom v zvezi z oboroževanjem (zagonski sklad)?
How will adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon impact on budgetary control competence concerning the armaments budget ('start-up fund')?
Običajno je za to pristojen Parlament.
Traditionally, after all, that competence lies with Parliament.
Člen 41(3) prečiščene pogodbe omogoča zagotovitev hitrega dostopa do odobrenih sredstev iz proračuna EU.
Article 41(3) of the consolidated treaty makes it possible to guarantee rapid access to appropriations in the EU budget.
Ali se to že nanaša na sedanja odobrena proračunska sredstva?
Does that already apply to current budget appropriations?
Ali je res, da bo po začetku veljavnosti pogodbe lahko Svet s kvalificirano večino odločal o višini in uporabi zagonskega sklada ter da Parlament zato ne bo več mogel opravljati proračunskega nadzora (člen 41(3) Pogodbe EU)?
Is it true that, after the treaty enters into force, the Council may take qualified-majority decisions on the amount and use of the start-up fund and that it will therefore no longer be possible for Parliament to exercise budgetary control (Article 41(3) of the EU Treaty)?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0395/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0395/09
Zadeva: Stockholmski program in pravice otrok
Subject: The Stockholm Programme and children's rights
Večletni program za območje svobode, varnosti in pravice (stockholmski program), ki ga predlaga švedsko predsedstvo, ne omenja priprave evropske strategije o pravicah otrok, čeprav je posebej navedena na seznamu prednostnih nalog za spodbujanje pravic državljanov v sporočilu Komisije (KOM(2009)262).
The Swedish Presidency’s proposal for a multiannual programme for an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (the Stockholm Programme) does not make any reference to the development of an EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child, which was specifically mentioned in the Commission Communication’s list (COM (2009)262) of priorities for promoting citizens’ rights.
Ta prednostna naloga je bistvena za zagotavljanje izvajanja predlaganega člena 2.3.2 programa in člena 3(3) Lizbonske pogodbe, ki določa, da EU spodbuja varstvo pravic otrok.
This priority is key to ensuring implementation of the proposed Article 2.3.2 and Lisbon Treaty Article 3(3), which state that the EU ‘shall […] promote […] protection of the rights of the child’.
Ali obstaja kak poseben razlog, zakaj ta prednostna naloga ni vključena, in ali bo Svet preučil njeno vključitev, da bi zagotovili zadostno izvajanje zavez o pravicah otrok?
Is there a particular reason why this priority has been taken out, and will the Council consider including it in order to ensure that undertakings on children’s rights are adequately implemented?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0396/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0396/09
Zadeva: Inovativno financiranje
Subject: Innovative financing
Svet je na zadnjem srečanju izjavil, da financiranje boja proti podnebnim spremembam ne bi smelo ogroziti doseganja razvojnih ciljev tisočletja.
At the most recent Council meeting the Council stated that deliveries of climate financing should not undermine progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
Ali lahko Svet podrobneje pojasni, kako bi bilo mogoče z „inovativnim financiranjem“ podpreti tako razvojne cilje tisočletja kot boj proti podnebnim spremembam?
Can the Council give more detail on how 'innovative financing' can play a role in both supporting the MDGs and climate financing?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0397/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0397/09
Zadeva: Revščina in Evropski socialni sklad
Subject: Poverty and the European Social Fund (ESF)
Sedanja gospodarska kriza je najhuje prizadela najbolj ranljive osebe v družbi.
People who are the most vulnerable in society are being hit the hardest by the current economic crisis.
Kakšen je predlog Komisije za zmanjšanje ravni revščine v Evropski uniji, zlasti pa kako naj bi se borili proti visoki ravni brezdomstva v državah članicah?
How does the Commission propose to reduce the poverty level in the European Union and, in particular, combat the homeless rate in Member States?
Kako bo Komisija zagotovila, da se bo Evropski socialni sklad uporabljal na najbolj učinkovit način za reševanje teh vprašanj?
In what way is the Commission going to ensure that the ESF is used in the most effective manner so as to address these issues?
S katerimi kazalniki lahko Komisija izmeri uspeh tega sklada na področjih politike, kjer se uporablja?
What indicators does the Commission have to measure the success of this fund in the policy areas which are applicable?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0398/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0398/09
Zadeva: Ruske uvozne dajatve
Subject: Russian import duties
V odgovoru na pisno vprašanje E-4200/09 z dne 25. avgusta 2009 je Komisija priznala, da so ruske oblasti od konca leta 2008 sprejele celo vrsto protekcionističnih ukrepov.
In an answer to Written Question E-4200/09 of 25 August 2009, the Commission acknowledges that the Russian authorities have adopted a whole range of protectionist measures since the end of 2008.
Povečanje carin znatno vpliva na izvoz več vrst blaga iz EU, kot so kombajni, osebna vozila, pohištvo in številni kmetijski proizvodi.
The tariff increases in question have a significant impact on many goods exported from the EU, such as combine harvesters, cars, furniture and numerous agricultural products.
Nadalje se uvozne dajatve uporabljajo za preprečevanje vstopa evropskim podjetjem v skupna podjetja, kot se je na primer zgodilo pred kratkim, ko sta nizozemsko podjetje Case New Holland in rusko podjetje Kamaz ustanovila skupno podjetje.
Moreover, import duties are abused in order to compel European companies to enter into joint ventures, for example the recent joint venture between Case New Holland and the Russian Kamaz.
EU si mora zato še naprej prizadevati za odpravo uvoznih dajatev na vse omenjene proizvode.
The EU must therefore continue to seek the abolition of these import duties on all these products.
Katere nadaljnje ukrepe je sedaj Komisija sprejela s tem v zvezi?
What further action has the Commission now taken in this context?
Kaj je v povezavi s tem vprašanjem prineslo vrhunsko srečanje med EU in Rusijo 18. in 19. novembra 2009?
What was the outcome of the EU-Russia summit on 18 and 19 November 2009 regarding this subject?
Ruske oblasti naj bi želele pregledati vsa začasna povečanja carin.
It is said that the Russian authorities wish to review all the temporary tariff increases.
Ali je že znan končni rezultat?
Is a final result already known?
Ali so ruske oblasti pripravljene sodelovati v uradnih posvetovanjih v skladu s členom 16 sporazuma med EU in Rusijo?
Are the Russian authorities prepared to engage in formal consultations pursuant to Article 16 of the EU-Russia agreement?
Kakšna je prihodnja strategija Komisije s tem v zvezi?
What is the Commission's further strategy in this regard?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0399/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0399/09
Zadeva: Status borcev protihitlerjanske koalicije v Evropski uniji
Subject: European Union status of combatant in the anti-Hitler alliance
V številnih državah članicah Evropske unije imajo veterani iz druge svetovne vojne, ki so se borili proti nacizmu in fašizmu, poseben status borcev protihitlerjanske koalicije.
In many EU Member States, Second World War veterans who fought against Nazism and Fascism are assigned the status of combatant in the anti-Hitler alliance.
Kakšni so načrti, da bi ta status razširili na vso Evropsko unijo?
How are plans being made to introduce a status of combatant in the anti-Hitler alliance throughout the European Union?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0400/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0400/09
Zadeva: Brezposelnost v EU
Subject: Unemployment in the EU
Ali je Svet zaskrbljen zaradi odliva delovnih mest iz EU v oddaljene vzhodne države, Kitajsko in Indijo?
Is the Council concerned at the haemorrhaging of jobs from the EU to Far-Eastern countries such as China and India?
Ali obstaja politika za oblikovanje skladne strategije, s katero bi ustvarili konkurenčnejše in privlačnejše okolje za ustvarjanje delovnih mest v EU?
Is there any policy of creating a coherent strategy in order to create a more competitive and attractive environment for job creation within the EU?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0401/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0401/09
Zadeva: Označevanje živil za potrošnike
Subject: Food labelling for consumers
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0402/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0402/09
Zadeva: Konferenca ZN o podnebnih spremembah v Københavnu
Subject: UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen
Ali lahko Svet na novo oceni napredek pogovorov v zvezi s prihodnjo konferenco ZN o podnebnih spremembah v Københavnu?
Can the Council give an updated assessment of the progress of talks in relation to the forthcoming UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0403/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0403/09
Zadeva: Dell in Evropski globalni sklad
Subject: Dell and the European Global Fund
Komisija je septembra letos napovedala, da bodo presežni delavci podjetja Dell prejeli pomoč iz Evropskega globalnega sklada v višini 14,8 milijona eurov.
In September of this year the Commission announced that European Global Fund assistance of €14.8 million would be given to Dell workers who had been made redundant.
V paketu je poudarjeno, da bodo imeli delavci možnost usposabljanja in prekvalifikacije, zaposlitvenega svetovanja ter dodatka za šolanje.
The package states that the workers would be offered training and retraining, job guidance and education allowances.
Ali lahko Komisija predstavi svoje mnenje o sedanjem stanju paketa?
Could the Commission comment on the current status of the package?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0404/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0404/09
Zadeva: Boj proti jemanju poživil - zahteva glede obvestila o (pre)bivališču športnika ("whereabouts information")
Subject: Combating doping - whereabouts
Belgijo je zajel val osuplosti, ko so bili nekateri teniški igralci za eno leto suspendirani, ker niso ustrezno izpolnili obrazca s podatki o (pre)bivališču.
In Belgium, considerable consternation has arisen after tennis players were suspended for one year for failing to correctly complete forms indicating their whereabouts.
Že zahteva glede obvestila o (pre)bivališču športnika je drastičen ukrep za „nedolžne“ športnike, zaradi česar so se pojavila številna vprašanja v zvezi s poseganjem v njihovo zasebnost.
The whereabouts reporting requirement is in any case a radical measure for 'innocent' sportspeople and gives rise to many questions regarding possible violation of their privacy.
Glede na to, da zadevni športniki niso jemali poživil, nikakor ni v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti, da so bili za eno leto suspendirani, ker niso ustrezno izpolnili obrazca s podatki o (pre)bivališču.
Punishing sportspeople with a one-year suspension for reporting their whereabouts inadequately in no way complies with the proportionality principle, as the sportspeople concerned have not in any way resorted to doping.
Športniki se lahko pritožijo le na Mednarodno športno arbitražno razsodišče, kar ne olajša uporabe te možnosti.
As the only remedy is appeal to the TAS, it is not easy for sportspeople to take up this option.
Kako Komisija ocenjuje te razmere glede na suspenze v primeru Meca-Medina?
What is the Commission's assessment of this situation in the light of the suspensions in the Meca-Medina case?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da morata biti strogost kazni za kršitev zahtev glede obvestila o (pre)bivališču športnika in pritožbeni postopek bolje usklajena na evropski in mednarodni ravni?
Does the Commission agree that the severity of the penalty for violations of the 'whereabouts' requirements and the appeal procedure should be better coordinated at European and international level?
Ali bo Komisija v zvezi s tem sprejela ukrepe?
Will the Commission take measures in this regard?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0405/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0405/09
Zadeva: Strategija EU proti organiziranemu kriminalu
Subject: EU strategy against organised crime
Po splošnem prepričanju je bila vpletena disidentska severnoirska teroristična skupina v sodelovanju s organiziranimi hudodelskimi združbami.
It is widely believed that a dissident Northern Ireland terrorist group, in collusion with organised crime groups, was involved.
Uspešnost te operacije gre pripisati odličnemu sodelovanju med britansko in irsko policijo, mornarico ter carinskimi in davčnimi organi.
The success of this operation was due to excellent co-operation between the British and Irish police, navies, and customs and revenue authorities.
Bo torej Komisija spodbujala druge države EU, da bodo sprejele to strategijo kot predlogo za močnejše vseevropsko sodelovanje v boju proti tihotapljenju tobaka in drog ter organiziranemu kriminalu na splošno?
Will the Commission therefore encourage other EU states to adopt this strategy as a template for stronger EU-wide co-operation against tobacco and drugs smuggling and organised crime in general?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0406/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0406/09
Zadeva: Rusija - nevarna država za novinarje
Subject: Russia, a dangerous country for journalists
Kako se namerava Svet odzvati na dejstvo, da je bila v nedavnih poročilih novinarskih organizacij Rusija uvrščena med države na svetu, ki so za novinarje najnevarnejše, saj so bili ti v zadnjih letih žrtve številnih umorov in napadov?
How does the Council intend to react to the recent reports by journalists' organisations in which Russia is described as one of the world's most dangerous countries for journalists, as evidenced by, among other things, the numerous beatings and murders of reporters that have occurred in recent years?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0407/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0407/09
Zadeva: Diskriminacija poljske manjšine v Litvi
Subject: Discrimination against the Polish minority in Lithuania
Kakšne ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi litvanska vlada prenehala diskriminirati poljsko manjšino v državi?
How does the Commission intend to put a stop to the discrimination to which the Polish national minority in Lithuania is being subjected?
V zadnjih mesecih se le še stopnjuje praksa, ki se jo izvaja že nekaj let: zniževanje števila poljskih šol in razredov, prisilna litvanizacija poljskih priimkov, nevračanje premoženja, ki so ga pred desetletji zasegle sovjetske oblasti (medtem ko so bili litvanski državljani ponovne privatizacije deležni v veliko večji meri), prepoved poljskih poimenovanj krajev in ulic na območjih, kjer prebiva poljska manjšina, kar je očitna kršitev evropskih standardov, in poskusi, da bi omejili pristojnosti poslancev, ki v litvanskem parlamentu predstavljajo poljsko manjšino.
Recent months have seen an intensification of measures that have been in place for a number of years now, such as: cuts in the number of Polish schools and Polish classes; forced Lithuanisation of surnames; failure to return property confiscated several decades ago by the Soviet authorities (whereas, for Lithuanians, the re-privatisation process is much more advanced); a ban, imposed in clear breach of European standards, on the use of Polish place and street names in areas inhabited by Polish communities; and attempts to weaken the position of members of the Lithuanian Parliament who represent Polish minority.
To so dejanja, ob katerih Komisija ne more molčati.
These are matters which the Commission cannot fail to address.
Naštete primere diskriminacije je treba nemudoma preiskati in v zvezi z njimi ukrepati.
Accordingly, does the Commission agree that the above situation should be looked into and acted upon without delay?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0408/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0408/09
Zadeva: Tretji energetski paket in varstvo evropskih odjemalcev energije
Subject: The third energy package and the protection of European energy consumers
Evropski Parlament je aprila odobril tretji zakonodajni paket o evropskem trgu z električno energijo in plinom.
The European Parliament approved the third legislative package on EU electricity and gas markets last April.
Eden glavnih ciljev zakonodajnega paketa je bil zaščititi evropske odjemalce energije pred velikimi energetskimi monopoli, tako da bi zagotovil ločitev delovanja plinovodov in omrežij za električno energijo od dejavnosti zagotavljanja plina ali proizvajanja energije.
One of the main goals of the legislative package has been to protect European energy consumers vis-à-vis large energy monopolies by ensuring the separation of the operation of gas pipelines and electricity networks from the business of providing gas or generating power.
Kdaj se pričakuje, da se bo tretji energijski paket polno izvajal, tj. da bodo vse države članice EU že izbrale model ločevanja, ki jim najbolj ustreza (med popolnim ločevanjem, neodvisnim upravljavcem omrežja in neodvisnim upravljavcem prenosa), ter izvedle ustrezne določbe?
When is it expected that the third energy package will be implemented in full, i.e. all EU Member States will have chosen their preferred model of unbundling (from the Full Unbundling, the Independent System Operator (ISO) and the Independent Transmission Operator (ITO)) and implemented their respective provisions?
Ali Komisija razpolaga z informacijami o tem, koliko držav članic EU je izbralo „najlažji“ model ločevanja, tj. neodvisnega upravljavca prenosa?
Does the Commission possess information on how many EU Member States have chosen the "lightest" model of unbundling, the ITO?
Kako namerava Komisija zaščititi interese evropskih odjemalcev energije, če bodo energetski trgi v več državah članicah ostali v rokah velikih energetskih monopolistov?
How does the Commission intend to protect the interests of European energy consumers if the energy markets in different Member States will remain in the hands of large energy monopolies?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0409/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0409/09
Zadeva: Sprememba strategije Evropske unije za regijo Baltskega morja
Subject: Changes to the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
Želel bi pozvati švedsko predsedstvo Evropske unije, naj preuči možnost spremembe strategije Evropske unije za regijo Baltskega morja in z njo povezanega akcijskega načrta.
I should like to draw the Swedish Presidency's attention to the question of whether changes may be made to the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and the accompanying Action Plan.
Ali bi lahko odstopali od načela, po katerem lahko prejmejo podporo samo odobreni projekti, ki so se že začeli izvajati, glede na to, da je bilo to načelo oblikovano brez posvetovanja s stranmi, ki jih ta strategija zadeva.
Would it be possible to depart from the rule that only projects that have already been agreed and commenced may be supported, given that that rule was not agreed with the Strategy's stakeholders?
Menim, da bi morali v vodilni projekt v zvezi s prometnimi infrastrukturami vključiti prometni koridor srednje Evrope CETC-ROUTE 65, ki prek Baltskega morja povezuje Skandinavijo ter regije, sodelujoče v pobudi CETC, na Poljskem, Češkem, Slovaškem, Madžarskem in Hrvaškem z Jadranskim morjem.
I ask this because the flagship project for transport infrastructure should include the Central European Transport Corridor (CETC) Route 65 from Scandinavia, via the Baltic Sea and the CETC regions of Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Croatia, to the Adriatic Sea.
Glede na povedano, kaj meni predsedstvo o vključitvi prometnega koridorja srednje Evrope v zgoraj navedeni dokument?
Given the above, what is the Presidency's position on including the CETC in the above document?
Ali namerava Svet sprejeti ukrepe v zvezi s tem?
What action does it intend to take in the matter?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0410/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0410/09
Zadeva: Nepravilnosti v kompenzacijskem postopku v ladjedelniški industriji
Subject: Irregularities in the compensation procedure in the shipbuilding sector
V skladu z zakonom o kompenzacijskem postopku za subjekte posebnega pomena za poljsko ladjedelniško industrijo je minister za zakladnico izmed kandidatov, ki jih je odobrila Evropska komisija, imenoval opazovalca za kompenzacijske dejavnosti.
In accordance with the law on the compensation procedure in entities of special importance for the Polish shipbuilding industry, the Minister of the State Treasury appointed an observer to the compensation process from among the candidates approved by the European Commission.
Ali bi Komisija lahko povedala, ali je v kompenzacijskem postopku ugotovila nepravilnosti, ali je opazovalec sodeloval (in še vedno sodeluje) v tem postopku in ali je bil postopek izveden skladno s sklepom Evropske komisije z dne 6. novembra 2008 o državni pomoči, ki jo je Poljska dodelila ladjedelnicama v Szczecinu in Gdynii?
Could the Commission indicate whether it has encountered any irregularities in the compensation procedure, whether the observer took part and is still taking part in the procedure, and whether the procedure was conducted in accordance with the Commission Decision of 6 November 2008 on State Aid by Poland to the Shipyards in Szczecin and Gdynia?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0411/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0411/09
Zadeva: Bližnjevzhodni mirovni proces
Subject: The Middle East peace process
Ali lahko Svet na novo oceni napredek pri bližnjevzhodnem mirovnem procesu?
Can the Council provide an updated assessment on the status of the Middle East peace process?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0412/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0412/09
Zadeva: Družbe, ki oddajajo vozila v najem
Subject: Car rental companies
Ali Komisija odobrava, da družbe, ki oddajajo vozila v najem, od potrošnikov zahtevajo, da ti pred najemom vozila plačajo poln rezervoar goriva, ne glede na dejstvo, da lahko potrošnik vrne vozilo s polovično napolnjenim rezervoarjem brez povračila stroškov?
Does the Commission approve of the practice by car rental companies that require consumers to pay for a full tank of fuel prior to rental, irrespective of the fact that the consumer may return the car to the rental company with, for example, half a tank of fuel remaining, and the consumer will not be reimbursed?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0413/09
ORAL QUESTION H-0413/09
Zadeva: Izobešanje verskih simbolov v javnih prostorih
Subject: Display of religious symbols in public places
Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice je 3.11.2009 ugodilo pritožbi italijansko-finske državljanke, ki je zahtevala odstranitev križev v italijanskih šolah.
On 3 November 2009, the European Court of Human Rights approved an application from an Italo-Finnish citizen seeking to remove crucifixes from schools.
Podobno se je zgodilo v Španiji, Nemčiji, Franciji in Italiji, kjer je državni svet leta 1988 poudaril, da križ ni zgolj simbol krščanske vere, ampak ima pomen, ki je neodvisen od posamezne veroizpovedi.
Similar episodes have occurred in Spain, Germany, France and Italy, where, in 1988, the Council of State noted that the crucifix was not only the symbol of the Christian religion but that it also held a significance that was independent of the specific faith.