natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali Komisija meni, da je sporazum o vladnih naročilih uravnotežen in ali imajo družbe EU na tujih trgih javnih naročil, zlasti na trgih naših največjih trgovinskih partnerjev, dostop, ki je sorazmeren z odpiranjem trgov javnih naročil EU tujim konkurentom?
Does the Commission consider that the GPA is a balanced agreement and that EU companies enjoy in foreign public procurement markets, especially those of our main trading partners, a degree of access which is commensurate to the opening of EU public procurement markets to foreign competition?
Ali lahko Komisija navede, ali so bili v potekajočih pogajanjih storjeni posebni koraki za sporazum o vladnih naročilih, da bi se zagotovilo boljši dostop na trg javnih naročil za evropska mala in srednje velika podjetja?
Could the Commission indicate whether any specific steps have been taken in the ongoing renegotiation of the GPA to ensure better access to public procurement markets for European small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)?
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kako bodo nedavne usmeritve, določene v sporočilu "Globalna Evropa", vplivale na trenutna pogajanja? (nota bene: to sporočilo predvideva predvsem odpravo diskriminacijske prakse, da bi se tako zagotovilo enake konkurenčne pogoje.)
Could the Commission indicate how the recent orientations set up in the Communication 'Global Europe' will impact the current negotiations? (nota bene: This Communication notably envisages targeting discriminatory practices in order to ensure a level playing field).
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kdaj in pod kakšnimi pogoji bo Kitajska postala pogodbenica sporazuma o vladnih naročilih, oziroma splošneje, kakšni so obeti za geografsko širitev tega sporazuma na druge države?
Could the Commission indicate when and under what conditions China could become a contracting party to the GPA and, more generally, what are the prospects of a geographical extension of this agreement to other countries?
Ali lahko Komisija navede ukrepe, s katerimi namerava zagotoviti, da bo ponovno izpogajani sporazum o vladnih naročilih v celoti upošteval interese držav v razvoju, ki bi želele sodelovati pri njem?
Could the Commission indicate what steps it is taking to ensure that a renegotiated GPA will fully respect the interests of developing countries if they wish to participate in the GPA?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0129/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0129/06
Zadeva: Pravočasen prenos in preverjanje statističnih podatkov, ki jih posredujejo države članice
Subject: Timely transmission and verification of statistical data provided by Member States
Kakovost podatkov, ki jih države članice posredujejo Eurostatu, je ključnega pomena za pravilno delovanje Evropske unije, zlasti za monetarno unijo in sistem proračunskega nadzora, pa tudi za konvergenčna merila pri ocenjevanju morebitne širitve euroobmočja.
The quality of data transmitted by Member States to Eurostat is vital for the correct functioning of the European Union, especially for monetary union and its budgetary surveillance system, as well as the convergence criteria when evaluating possible enlargements of the euro area.
Kako Komisija ocenjuje te dogodke?
What is the Commission's assessment of these occurrences?
Ali je prepričana, da so podatki, ki jih prejema, v splošnem kakovostni?
Is the Commission confident enough about the overall quality of the data it receives?
Kako Komisija preverja verodostojnost prejetih podatkov?
How does the Commission check the plausibility of data received?
Ali jih primerja z drugimi viri informacij, na primer viri Mednarodnega denarnega sklada in OECD ter ustanov, ki pripravljajo gospodarske napovedi, in bonitetnih agencij?
Is the Commission checking its data against other sources of information such as the IMF and the OECD, but also economic forecast institutions and rating agencies?
Ali se Komisija zaveda, da utegne biti ogrožena njena verodostojnost, pa tudi verodostojnost njenih politik in Evropske unije nasploh?
Is the Commission aware of a possible credibility problem for itself, its policies, and the European Union in general?
Ali Komisija meni, da je naredila vse, kar je bilo v njeni moči, ali morda potrebuje večja pooblastila in/ali sredstva, da bo lahko ustrezno opravljala svoje naloge?
Does the Commission consider it did all it could possibly do, or are further powers and/or resources to be given to the Commission to properly carry out its tasks?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0130/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0130/06
Zadeva: Preseljevanje Romov znotraj meja EU
Subject: The migration of Roma within the EU borders
V skladu z odgovorom Evropske komisije na parlamentarno vprašanje E-0343/06 se predvideva, da je bilo vse od leta 2000 za vključevanje Romov v EU porabljenih več kot 750 milijonov EUR.
According to the answer given by the Commission to the Parliamentary Question E-0343/06 , an estimated amount of over € 750 million has been spent since 2000 towards the integration of Roma in the EU.
Kljub temu, da je bilo v poročilih Evropske komisije o napredku držav kandidatk pri pristopu v preteklih letih nenehno poudarjeno dejstvo, da so Romi diskriminirani.
Despite this, the Commission reports on the progress of candidate countries towards accession have consistently highlighted in past years the discrimination that Roma face.
To je bilo večkrat ponovljeno tudi v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta o razmerah Romov v EU, ki je bila sprejeta aprila leta 2005, kot tudi v poročilu Evropskega centra za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije za leto 2006 , ki potrjuje dejstvo, da so Romi, živeči v EU in državah kandidatkah, še vedno žrtve rasne diskriminacije in rasne nestrpnosti do Romov.
This was reiterated in the European Parliament resolution on the situation of Roma in the EU adopted in April 2005 as well as in the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia annual report in 2006, which confirms that Roma living in the EU and in the candidate countries still suffer from racial discrimination and anti-gypsyism.
V nekaterih primerih so Romi žrtve hude strukturne diskriminacije, revščine in socialne izključenosti, zmerjanja, fizičnih napadov s strani skupin skrajnežev, nezakonite deložacije in nadlegovanja policije.
In some cases, Roma are subject to severe structural discrimination, poverty and social exclusion, hate speech, physical attacks by extremist groups, unlawful evictions and police harassment.
Ali se Evropske komisija zaveda, da so te razmere vodile do preseljevanja Romov, ki živijo v EU-10, v zahodno Evropo, in da se lahko ta pojav takrat, ko bodo romski državljani Romunije in Bolgarije postali državljani EU, samo še stopnjuje?
Is the Commission aware that this situation has led to the migration of Roma living in the EU 10 into western Europe and that this phenomenon may increase once Roma citizens of Romania and Bulgaria become EU citizens?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Evropska komisija uvesti za krepitev napredka, ki so ga doslej zabeležile vlade držav kandidatk in številne države članice, kot na primer Slovaška, Češka, Slovenija in Madžarska?
What does the Commission intend to do to build on progress registered to date by the governments of the candidate countries and several Member States such as Slovakia, Czech Republic, Slovenia, and Hungary?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0131/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0131/06
, v imenu Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ,
, on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ,
Konec junija 2006 so mediji odkrili, da je podjetje SWIFT od konca leta 2001 naprej oblastem v ZDA pošiljalo osebne podatke.
At the end of June 2006, the media revealed that SWIFT had been providing personal data to the US authorities since the end of 2001.
Delovna skupina, ustanovljena v skladu s členom 29, je 22. novembra sprejela mnenje, v katerem je sklenila, da je bila kršena direktiva EU o varstvu osebnih podatkov 95/46/ES , in pozvala k sprejetju ukrepov, ki bi nemudoma popravili sedanje nezakonito stanje.
On 22 November, the Article 29 Working Party adopted an opinion concluding that the EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC had not been respected and calling for measures to be taken in order to remedy the currently illegal state of affairs without delay.
Vprašanja Svetu so naslednja:
Our questions to the Council are the following.
Svet in države članice so se do sedaj v tej zadevi vzdržale vsakršnega komentarja.
The Council and the Member States have been particularly silent in this affair so far.
Predvsem je Svet odklonil sodelovanje v zaslišanju, ki sta ga skupaj pripravila odbora ECON in LIBE.
Notably the Council declined to participate in the hearing jointly held by the ECON and LIBE committees.
Zakaj so bili Svet in države članice tako pasivni v zadevi, pri kateri podatki o njihovih državljanih niso bili varovani in pri kateri je morda šlo za poslovno vohunjenje?
Why have the Council and the Member States been passive in an affair where their citizens' data have not been protected and where there is a suspicion of business espionage?
Kakšni so cilji nove delovne skupine, ki je bila nedavno ustanovljena v Svetu – ali obstaja namera, da bi se z oblastmi ZDA pogajali o tej zadevi?
What is the aim of the new Working Group recently created in the Council - is there an intention to negotiate with the US administration on the matter?
Ali bo bodoči sporazum skladen z novimi evropskimi pravili na tem področju (Uredba (ES) št. 1781/2006 z dne 15. novembra 2006 o podatkih o plačniku, ki spremljajo prenose denarnih sredstev)?
Will the future agreement be compliant with the new European rules in this domain (REG (EC) No 1781/2006 of 15 November 2006 on information on the payer accompanying transfers of funds)?
Ali Svet ve, ali se podatki, ki jih zbira SWIFT, vnašajo v ameriški sistem ATS (Automatic Targeting System)?
Does the Council know whether the data collected by SWIFT are fed into the US Automatic Targeting System?
Kar zadeva sporočanje osebnih podatkov finančnemu ministrstvu ZDA, delovna skupina po členu 29 meni, da je na voljo že obstoječ mednarodni okvir v boju proti terorizmu in da bi bilo treba možnosti, ki jih ponuja ta okvir, izkoristiti ob hkratnem zagotavljanju zahtevane ravni varstva temeljnih pravic.
As far as the communication of personal data to the US Treasury is concerned, the Article 29 WP considers that an existing international framework is already available in the fight against terrorism and that the possibility already offered therein should be exploited while ensuring the required level of protection of fundamental rights.
Kaj namerava Svet v takšnem okviru ukreniti v zvezi z oblastmi ZDA, da bi obnovil spoštovanje temeljnih evropskih načel, kar zadeva varstvo podatkov?
What actions within such a framework does the Council intend to take regarding US authorities to restore respect for fundamental European principles as regards data protection?
Dostop do podatkov, s katerimi upravlja SWIFT, omogoča pridobivanje podatkov o gospodarskih dejavnostih zadevnih posameznikov, podjetij ali držav, kar bi lahko pripeljalo do različnih oblik gospodarskega in poslovnega vohunjenja.
Access to data managed by SWIFT makes it possible to get information on the economic activities of the individuals, businesses and countries concerned which could give rise to forms of economic and business espionage.
Kaj namerava ukreniti Svet v zvezi s temi možnostmi?
In view of this potential, what actions does the Council intend to take?
UL L 345 z dne 8.12.2006, str.
OJ L 345, 8.12.2006, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0132/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0132/06
Konec junija 2006 so mediji odkrili, da je podjetje SWIFT od konca leta 2001 naprej oblastem v ZDA pošiljalo osebne podatke.
At the end of June 2006 the media revealed that SWIFT had been providing personal data to the US authorities since the end of 2001.
Tako si je stanje razlagala tudi Komisija, ki je države članice formalno vprašala o morebitnih kršitvah direktive 95/46/ES s strani podjetja Swift.
Such an interpretation has been shared by the Commission, which has formally asked the Member States about the possible infringement by SWIFT of Directive 95/46/EC.
Kakšni so bili rezultati pisem, ki jih je Komisija poslala državam članicam?
What is the outcome of the letters sent by the Commission to the Member States?
Kaj namerava Komisija v takšnem okviru ukreniti v zvezi z oblastmi ZDA, da bi obnovil spoštovanje temeljnih načel o varstvu podatkov in nove evropske zakonodaje na tem področju (Uredba (ES) št. 1781/2006 z dne 15. novembra 2006 o podatkih o plačniku, ki spremljajo prenose denarnih sredstev)?
Within such a framework, what actions does the Commission intend to take as regards the US authorities in order to restore respect for fundamental principles of data protection and the new European law in this domain (REG (EC) No 1781/2006 of 15 November 2006 on information on the payer accompanying transfers of funds)?
Dostop do podatkov, s katerimi upravlja SWIFT, omogoča pridobivanje podatkov o gospodarskih dejavnostih zadevnih posameznikov, podjetij ali držav, kar bi lahko pripeljalo do različnih oblik gospodarskega in poslovnega vohunjenja.
Access to data managed by SWIFT makes it possible to get information on the economic activities of the individuals, businesses and countries concerned, which could give rise to forms of economic and businesses espionage.
Kaj namerava ukreniti Komisija v zvezi s temi možnostmi?
In view of this potential, what actions does the Commission intend to take?
Ali lahko Komisija predloži vsebino memoranduma o soglasju med podjetjem SWIFT in oblastmi ZDA, ki določa postopek dostopa ameriških oblasti do podatkov?
Can the Commission deliver the content of the MOU between SWIFT and the US authorities which sets out the procedure for access to the data by the US authorities?
Ali Komisija ve, ali se podatki, ki jih zbira SWIFT, vnašajo v ameriški sistem ATS (Automatic Targeting System)?
Does the Commission know whether the data collected by SWIFT are fed into the US Automatic Targeting System?
Glede na razkritje, da je podjetje SWIFT ameriškim oblastem omogočalo dostop do osebnih podatkov, ali je Komisija seznanjena s morebitnimi drugimi zahtevami, naslovljenimi na katera druga zasebna podjetja (kot so recimo izdajateljice bančnih kartic, ponudniki telekomunikacij, ponudniki socialnega varstva), da bi ameriškim oblastem omogočila dostop do svojih podatkov?
Given the revelations about SWIFT providing personal data to the US authorities, is the Commission aware of any other requests to any other private companies (such as bank card companies, telecommunication providers, social security providers) to make their data available to the US authorities?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0001/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0001/07
Zadeva: Ukrepi Skupnosti za zagotavljanje čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva
Subject: Community action on the provision of cross-border health care
Kaj namerava storiti Komisija za vzpostavitev okvira Skupnosti za zanesljivo, visoko kakovostno in učinkovito čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo?
What does the Commission intend to do in order to develop a Community framework for safe, high-quality and efficient cross-border health care?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti pravico državljanov do dostopa do zdravstvenega varstva v Evropi ter hkrati ohraniti pristojnosti držav članic pri organizaciji in zagotavljanju zdravstvenega varstva?
How does the Commission plan to ensure citizens' rights of access to health care across Europe while maintaining Member States' prerogatives in the organisation and delivery of health care?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0002/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0002/07
Zadeva: Zelena knjiga Komisije in javna razprava o morebitni reformi instrumentov trgovinske politike EU
Subject: Commission Green Paper and public consultation on a possible reform of EU trade policy instruments
Dne 6. decembra 2006 je Komisija sprejela Zeleno knjigo za javno razpravo na temo "Evropski instrumenti trgovinske zaščite v spreminjajočem se globalnem gospodarstvu".
On 6 December 2006, the Commission adopted a Green Paper for public consultation on 'Europe's trade defence instruments in a changing global economy'.
Pričakovati je, da bo javna razprava utrla pot predlogom Komisije za reformo temeljnih predpisov o instrumentih trgovinske zaščite EU (protidampinških, protisubvencijskih in zaščitnih).
It is expected that this public consultation will pave the way for Commission proposals to reform the basic regulations concerning EU trade defence instruments (anti-dumping, anti-subsidies and safeguards).
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino Evropskega parlamenta je sprožil pobudo za poročilo o tej temi, ki bo pripravljeno potem, ko bodo znani rezultati javne razprave in vsebina predlogov Komisije.
The Committee on international trade of the European Parliament has taken the initiative of a report on the subject which will be prepared after the results of the public consultation and the contents of the Commission proposals are known.
Namen tega vprašanja za ustni odgovor je pojasniti ozadje in namen same zelene knjige ter omogočiti poslancem Evropskega parlamenta, da v okviru javne razprave izrazijo svoje poglede, vendar ne da bi pri tem že vnaprej presojali stališča, ki bodo izražena v prihodnjem poročilu.
The purpose of this oral question is to clarify the background and purpose of the Green Paper itself and to allow members of the European Parliament to express their views in the framework of the public consultation, without prejudging, however, the positions to be expressed in the future report.
Ali bi v zvezi s tem Komisija lahko:
In this context, could the Commission:
razložila poglavitne dejavnike, ki so jo vodili k sprožitvi takšne javne razprave in k predvidevanju morebitne večje reforme instrumentov trgovinske zaščite EU?
explain the main considerations which have led it to initiate such a public consultation and to envisage a potentially major reform of EU trade defence instruments;
razložila, zakaj je bila ta pobuda sprožena prav ob tem času, in še posebej, zakaj se ni zdelo primernejše počakati na izid trenutno potekajočih pogajanj o protidampinških, protisubvencijskih in zaščitnih ukrepih v okviru STO, ki bi lahko vplival na mednarodni zakonodajni okvir, znotraj katerega se uporabljajo instrumenti trgovinske zaščite EU?
explain why this initiative has been taken at this precise point of time and why, in particular, it was not considered more appropriate to await the outcome of the ongoing negotiations on anti-dumping, anti-subsidies and safeguards in the WTO which could affect the international legal framework within which EU trade defence instruments are applied;
pojasnila, ali EU v okviru reforme instrumentov trgovinske zaščite EU sledi zaščitniški politiki ali ustrezni politiki "odziva in zaščite"?
clarify whether, in the context of the reform of the EU trade defence instruments, the EU is pursuing a protectionist or an appropriate 'response and defence' policy;
pojasnila, kakšni so njeni nameni v zvezi z vsako od šestih kategorij vprašanj, zajetih v zeleni knjigi, in navedla konkretne predloge sprememb temeljnih predpisov, ki bi lahko bili podani, pa tudi njihove morebitne učinke na uporabo in vpliv instrumentov trgovinske zaščite EU?
clarify its intentions behind each of the six categories of questions covered by the Green Paper and specify the concrete amendments to the basic regulations which could be proposed as well as their potential effects on the application and impact of EU trade defence instruments;
navedla, v kakšnem obsegu bodo rezultati razprave javno objavljeni in kako bodo vplivali na predloge, ki jih bo na koncu Komisija predložila Svetu?
indicate to what extent the results of the consultation will be made public and how they will influence the proposals to be eventually submitted by the Commission to the Council;
navedla, kako bi lahko reforma instrumentov trgovinske zaščite omogočila prilagoditev ukrepov trgovinske zaščite, da bi bil njihov učinek na evropsko rast in konkurenčnost bolj upoštevan?
indicate how a reform of the trade defence instruments could make it possible to adjust trade defence measures to better take into account their overall effect on European growth and competitiveness;
zagotovila, da bo v tem delu revizijskega postopka pokazala svojo zavezanost k preglednosti z odprtjem odločilnih dosjejev za potrebe obširnejšega pregleda učinkovitosti svojih instrumentov trgovinske zaščite?
provide assurance that in this part of the review process, it will demonstrate its commitment to transparency by opening up files of relevance to a broader review of the efficiency and effectiveness of its trade defence instruments practices;
navedla, ali namerava naročiti nove neodvisne študije/ocene učinkovitosti instrumentov trgovinske zaščite in jih kasneje objaviti?
indicate whether it intends to commission any new independent studies/evaluations of the effectiveness of trade defence instruments and subsequently make these studies public;
zagotovila, da bo Evropski parlament v vseh fazah tega procesa obveščen in da bodo stališča, ki jih bodo izrazili njegovi poslanci, v celoti upoštevana tako v okviru javne razprave kot v okviru prihodnjih razprav v Svetu na podlagi predlogov Komisije?
provide assurance that the European Parliament will be kept informed at all stages of the process and that the views expressed by its members will be fully taken into account both in the framework of the public consultation and in the framework of future discussions in the Council on the basis of the Commission's proposals?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0003/07
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0003/07
Zadeva: Omejitve EU glede tekočin, ki jih lahko potniki prinesejo na letalo
Subject: EU restrictions on liquids that passengers can carry on aircrafts
Svet je sprejel Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1448/2006 o letalski varnosti, ki vsebuje tajno prilogo z omejevalnimi ukrepi glede tekočin, ki jih potniki lahko prinesejo na letalo v svoji ročni prtljagi.
The Council has adopted Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1448/2006 on aviation security containing a secret annex with restrictive measures on liquids that passengers are allowed to carry on aircraft in their hand luggage.
Katere kazni se uporabljajo v primeru zavračanja ali kršenja pravil?
What sanctions are applied in the event of refusal to follow or of breach of the rules?
Kako se bo preprečilo popolno samovoljnost pri praktičnem izvajanju tajnega predpisa in njegovih izjem?
How is it intended to avoid pure arbitrariness in the practical implementation of a secret rule and its exceptions?
Kako lahko posameznik na licu mesta ali kasneje spodbija odločbo ali kazen in se pritoži, če je predpis tajen?
How can a person contest a decision or a sanction, on the spot or at a later stage, and look for legal remedy, if the rule is secret?
S čim Komisija opravičuje ta ukrep?
What is the justification for the measure?
Zakaj in na kakšni osnovi je predlagala tak ukrep, katera izvedenska mnenja je zbrala, preden je sprejela odločitev, in ali je izvedla test sorazmernosti, potrebe in učinkovitosti, tako glede pravic kot glede varnosti državljanov?
Why and on what basis has the Commission proposed such a measure, what specialised expertise did it gather before taking the decision, and has a proportionality, necessity and efficiency test, both in terms of citizens' rights and of security, been applied?
Zakaj je uporaba ukrepov neusklajena in prepuščena diskrecijski pravici držav članic ter upravam in varnostnim službam letališč?
Why is the application of the measure not harmonised and left to the discretionary powers of Member States, airport authorities and security services?
Bo Evropska komisija ocenila praktične posledice ukrepov na posameznike, na njihove pravice ter na izvajanje storitev na letališču (pregledovanje prtljage, prestopanje) ter o tem obvestila javnost in EP?
Will the European Commission evaluate and inform the public and the EP on the practical consequences of the measure on individuals, and their rights, as well as on airport land services management (checked luggage, connecting flights, etc.)?