natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zadeva: Litovski zakon za zaščito mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi učinki javnega obveščanja
Subject: Lithuanian law for the protection of minors against the detrimental effect of public information
Litovski parlament je prejšnji torek na 220. obletnico padca Bastilje – na dan, ko se spominjamo razsvetljenskih vrednot, kot sta svoboda izražanja in pravica do iskanja osebne sreče – sprejel spremembe zakona o zaščiti mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi učinki javnega obveščanja.
The Lithuanian Parliament approved last Tuesday amendments to the Law on the protection of minors against the detrimental effects of public information, on the day of the 220th anniversary of the Fall of the Bastille, on which we remember such values of the Enlightenment as freedom of expression and the right to the pursuit of happiness.
Na prejšnjo različico tega zakona je dal veto predsednik Litve, novo različico pa je litovski parlament potrdil 14. julija 2009, na dan, ko je imel Evropski parlament ustanovno zasedanje po volitvah.
This law – that in a previous version had been vetoed by the President of Lithuania – was confirmed by the Lithuanian Parliament on 14 July 2009, the same day on which the European Parliament held its constituent sitting after the elections.
Zakon prepoveduje prikazovanje „javnih informacij, ki se zavzemajo za homoseksualne odnose“ in so „v nasprotju z družinskimi vrednotami“, če bi bile lahko te informacije dostopne mladoletnikom.
This is a law that aims to prevent the display of ‘public information that agitates for homosexual relations’ and that ‘defies family values’, on the grounds that such information could be available to minors.
Predlagane so bile tudi določbe kazenskega in upravnega zakonika, o katerih se bo razpravljalo in bodo morda sprejete septembra; če se bo to zgodilo, bodo osebe, ki “propagirajo homoseksualnost”, kriminalizirane in bodo lahko kaznovane z zaporno kaznijo, javnimi deli ali denarno kaznijo do 1500 EUR.
Furthermore, new provisions in the penal and administrative codes are being proposed, to be discussed and approved in September, that would presumably lead to the criminalisation of people ‘propagating homosexuality’, which would then be punishable by means of arrest, sentencing to community labour, or the payment of fines of up to 1500 euros.
Ali je Svet razpravljal z litovskimi oblastmi o omenjenih zadevah?
Has the Council discussed the abovementioned issues with the Lithuanian authorities?
Ali ni mnenje Sveta, da takšen zakon in predlogi sprememb niso v skladu s človekovimi pravicami in temeljnimi svoboščinami, kot so zapisane v mednarodnih in evropskih konvencijah, ter še zlasti s svobodo izražanja, ki vključuje pravico do iskanja, sprejemanja in širjenja informacij, ter da niso skladni s protidiskriminacijsko zakonodajo in politiko EU?
Does the Council not think that such law and amendments are incompatible with human rights and fundamental freedoms, as enshrined in international and European conventions, and notably with freedom of expression – which includes the right to seek, receive and impart information, and that it is incompatible with EU law and policies preventing discrimination?
Ali se Svetu ne zdi, da je takšen zakon v nasprotju z evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah, z listino EU o temeljnih pravicah, s členom 6 Pogodbe o EU in členom 13 Pogodbe o ES, torej s temeljnimi vrednotami, na katerih temelji EU?
Does the Council not think that such law is in contradiction with the European Convention on Human Rights, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 6 of the EU Treaty and Article 13 of the EU Treaty, i.e. the fundamental values on which the EU is based?
Ali bo Svet zahteval, da agencija za temeljne pravice oceni ta zakon in predloge za njegovo spremembo?
Will the Council request the Fundamental Rights Agency to assess the law and the amendments?
Ali je pripravljen sprožiti postopek iz člena 7 Pogodbe o EU, če bo to potrebno?
Is it ready if necessary to activate the procedure provided for in article 7 of the EU Treaty?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0082/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0082/09
Litovski parlament je prejšnji torek na 220. obletnico padca Bastilje – na dan, ko se spominjamo razsvetljenskih vrednot, kot sta svoboda izražanja in pravica do iskanja osebne sreče – sprejel spremembe zakona o zaščiti mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi učinki javnega obveščanja.
The Lithuanian Parliament approved last Tuesday amendments to the law on the protection of minors against the detrimental effects of public information on the day of the 220th anniversary of the Fall of the Bastille, on which we remember such values of the Enlightenment as freedom of expression and the right to the pursuit of happiness.
Na prejšnjo različico tega zakona je dal veto predsednik Litve, novo različico pa je litovski parlament potrdil 14. julija 2009, na dan, ko je imel Evropski parlament ustanovno zasedanje po volitvah.
This law - that in a previous version had been vetoed by the President of Lithuania - confirmed by the Lithuanian Parliament on 14 July 2009, was the same day on which the European Parliament held its constituent sitting after the elections.
Ali se Komisiji ne zdi, da je takšen zakon v nasprotju z evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah, z listino EU o temeljnih pravicah, s členom 6 Pogodbe o EU in členom 13 Pogodbe o ES, torej s temeljnimi vrednotami, na katerih temelji Evropa?
Does the Commission not think that such law is in contradiction with the European Convention on Human Rights, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 6 TEU of the EU Treaty and Article 13 TEC of the EC Treaty, i.e. the fundamental values on which Europe is based?
Kaj bo Komisija storila, da bi zagotovila, da bo Litva spoštovala svoje obveznosti iz evropskega in mednarodnega prava?
What will the Commission do to ensure that Lithuania complies with its obligations under European and international law?
Ali je Komisija zahtevala informacije o tem, za kakšno gradivo bo ta zakon veljal?
Has the Commission requested information on what kind of materials fall under this law?
Ali bo veljal tudi za knjige, umetnost, tisk, oglase, glasbo in javne predstave, kot je gledališče?
Does its jurisdiction extend to books, art, press, advertising, music and public performance such as theatre?
Ali ne bodo avtorji, založniki in novinarji zaradi nejasnih definicij v zakonu izvajali samocenzure, da bi se izognili kaznim, o katerih trenutno poteka razprava?
Would the vagueness of that definition not leave authors, publishers and journalists subject to self-censorship in order to avoid the punishments now being discussed?
Ali izvajanje takšnega zakona ni poseganje države in oblasti v opredelitev meja in narave zasebne sfere, zato je kot takšno v navzkrižju s svobodno in pluralistično družbo?
Would the enforcement of such a law not constitute encroachment by the State and the authorities into the definition of the limits and nature of the public sphere, and as such would it not be incompatible with the freedom and pluralism of society?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena sprožiti postopek iz člena 7 Pogodbe o EU, če bo to potrebno?
Is the Commission ready if necessary to activate the procedure provided for in Article 7 TEU of the EU Treaty?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0083/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0083/09
, v imenu skupine S-D
, on behalf of the S-D Group
Litovski parlament je 11. junija 2009 sprejel spremembe zakona o zaščiti mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi učinki javnega obveščanja.
On 11 June 2009 the Lithuanian Parliament approved amendments to the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effects of Public Information.
V zakonu je navedeno, da javno obveščanje, ki napeljuje k homoseksualnim odnosom, povzroča škodljive posledice za razvoj mladoletnikov (člen 4.14) ter da je v nasprotju z družinskimi vrednotami (člen 4.15).
The law asserts that ‘a detrimental effect on the development of minors’ is caused by ‘public information that agitates for homosexual and bisexual relations’ (Art. 4.14) and that ‘defies family values’ (Art. 4.15).
Takšna določba informacije o homoseksualnosti izenačuje z zadevami, kot so prikazovanje fizičnega nasilja, razkazovanje kruto pohabljenega človeškega telesa in spodbujanje samopohabljanja ali samomora.
Such a provision puts information about homosexuality on a par with issues such as the portrayal of physical violence, the display of a cruelly mutilated human body, and information that encourages self-mutilation or suicide.
Litovski predsednik je 26. junija 2009 podal veto na ta zakon zaradi posplošitev in nejasnosti, ki jih vsebuje, ter zaprosil parlament, naj ga ponovno obravnava in zagotovi, da bo skladen z ustavnimi načeli pravne države, pravne varnosti in pravne jasnosti ter da ne bo v nasprotju z jamstvi odprte družbe in pluralistične demokracije.
The President of Lithuania vetoed the law on 26 June 2009, as it was drafted in vague and unclear terms, and asked the Parliament to reconsider it to ensure that it complied with ‘the constitutional principles of the rule of law, legal certainty, and legal clarity’ and was ‘not in conflict with the guarantees of an open society and pluralistic democracy’.
Parlament je 14. julija 2009 veto predsednika zavrnil.
The Parliament overruled the veto of the President on 14 July 2009.
Nevladne organizacije za človekove pravice in poslanci Evropskega parlamenta so večkrat pozvali institucije EU k posredovanju in litovski parlament (seimas) k reviziji osnutka zakona, vložena pa bo tudi pritožba na ustavnemu sodišču.
Human rights NGOs and MEPs have repeatedly called on EU institutions to intervene and the Seimas to review the draft law, while an appeal will be filed with the Constitutional Court.
Poleg tega bodo jeseni obravnavani predlogi sprememb kazenskega in upravnega zakonika, s katerimi dejanja fizičnih ali pravnih oseb, ki „propagirajo homoseksualnost“ na javnih mestih, postanejo kazniva dejanja, ki se kaznujejo bodisi z javnim delom bodisi z globo v višini do 1.500 EUR ali z odvzemom prostosti.
Furthermore, amendments to the penal and administrative codes which criminalise acts by private or legal persons ‘propagating homosexuality’ in public areas, to be punished either by public works, or by a fine of up to 1 500 Euros, or by arrest, will be examined in the autumn.
Ali je Svet razpravljal o omenjenih zadevah z litovskimi oblastmi?
Has the Council discussed the above-mentioned issues with the Lithuanian authorities?
Ali bo Svet zahteval, da agencija za temeljne pravice oceni ta zakon in predloge za njegovo spremembo?
Will the Council ask the Fundamental Rights Agency to assess the law and the amendments?
Kaj bo storil Svet, da bi zagotovil, da bo Litva spoštovala svoje obveznosti iz pogodb o EU ter evropskega in mednarodnega prava?
What will the Council do to ensure that Lithuania respects its obligations under the EU Treaties, European and international law?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0084/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0084/09
Takšna določba informacije o homoseksualnosti izenačuje z zadevami, kot so prikazovanje fizičnega nasilja, razkazovanje kruto pohabljenega človeškega telesa in spodbujanje samopohabljanja ali samomora.
Such a provision puts information about homosexuality on a par with issues such as the portrayal of physical violence, the display of a cruelly mutilated human body, and information that encourages self mutilation or suicide.
Ali je Komisija razpravljala o omenjenih zadevah z litovskimi oblastmi?
Has the Commission discussed the above mentioned issues with the Lithuanian authorities?
Ali bo Komisija zahtevala, da agencija za temeljne pravice oceni ta zakon in predloge za njegovo spremembo?
Will the Commission ask the Fundamental Rights Agency to assess the law and the amendments?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0085/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0085/09
Zadeva: Kriza v sektorju prireje mleka
Subject: Crisis in the dairy farming sector
Kako so se razmere na trgu mleka in odkupne cene za mleko spremenile od objave sporočila Komisije 22. julija 2009?
How did the situation on the dairy markets and farm gate prices for milk evolve since the publication of the Commission Communication on 22 July 2009?
S katerimi ukrepi se namerava Komisija odzvati na pismo, ki ga je podpisalo osem ministrov za kmetijstvo v zvezi s krizo v tem sektorju?
What follow-up does the Commission intend to give to the letter signed by eight Ministers of agriculture regarding the crisis in this sector?
Kakšen je konkretni rezultat razprav o mlečni krizi na izredni seji Sveta za kmetijstvo 7. septembra 2009?
Which is the concrete outcome of the discussions on the dairy crisis in the extraordinary Agriculture Council meeting on 7 September 2009?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0086/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0086/09
Zadeva: Razvoj plinovoda Nabucco
Subject: Development of the Nabucco gas pipeline
13. julija so štiri države članice in Turčija v Ankari podpisale sporazum, ki utira pot plinovodu Nabucco, s katerim bi zmanjšali odvisnost Evrope od ruskega plina.
On 13 July, four Member States and Turkey signed an agreement in Ankara paving the way for the Nabucco pipeline in order to reduce Europe's dependence on Russian gas.
Mesec dni kasneje, 6. avgusta, sta turški predsednik vlade Erdogan in ruski predsednik vlade Putin podpisala protokol o začetku raziskovalnega dela za plinovod Južni tok, ki zadeva tudi južni koridor.
A month later (6 August), Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan signed a protocol with Russian Prime Minister Putin to start exploration work on the South Stream pipeline, which also concerns the Southern Corridor.
Kako predsedstvo ocenjuje vzporedni začetek teh dveh projektov?
How does the Presidency assess the parallel launch of these two projects?
Katere konkretne ukrepe je sprejel Svet v podporo projektu Nabucco?
What concrete steps is the Council taking in order to support Nabucco?
Ali namerava Svet začeti odprto in pregledno razpravo, zato da bi uporabili skupno strategijo glede držav, ki so največje proizvajalke in izvoznice, obenem pa tranzitne države, ter da bi razvili pravo skupno evropsko energetsko politiko?
Does the Council intend to start an open and transparent discussion with a view to implementing a common strategy vis-à-vis main energy producing, exporting and transit countries and developing a genuine Common European Energy Policy?
Kako namerava Svet obravnavati to vprašanje s Turčijo, ki ima pri razvoju južnega koridorja ključno in strateško vlogo?
How does the Council plan to address this issue with Turkey, whih plays a crucial and strategic role as regards the development of the South Corridor?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0087/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0087/09
Kako Komisija ocenjuje vzporedni začetek teh dveh projektov?
How does the Commission assess the parallel launch of these two projects?
Katere konkretne ukrepe je sprejela Komisija v podporo projektu Nabucco?
What concrete steps is the Commission taking in order to support Nabucco?
Kako namerava Komisija obravnavati to vprašanje s Turčijo, ki ima pri razvoju južnega koridorja ključno in strateško vlogo?
How does the Commission plan to address this issue with Turkey, which plays a crucial and strategic role as regards the development of the South Corridor?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0088/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0088/09
Zadeva: Učinki svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize na države v razvoju in razvojno sodelovanje
Subject: The effects of the global financial and economic crisis on developing countries and on development cooperation
Toda medtem ko je bilo 82 odstotkov sredstev za nova posojila Mednarodna denarnega sklada namenjenih območju Evrope, so jih države v Afriki prejele zgolj 1,6%.
However, while 82% of the IMF's newly loaned resources have gone to the European area, only 1.6% has gone to countries in Africa.
Kako namerava Evropska komisija zagotoviti, da bo več teh sredstev prispelo v najrevnejše države?
What will the Commission do with a view to making sure that more of these resources reach the poorest countries?
Čeprav bi učinkovit odziv na krizo zahteval nov, zajeten vložek sredstev, se je morala Svetovna banka odzvati predvsem z lastnimi razpoložljivimi sredstvi in zmogljivostmi.
An effective crisis response would require a new and large injection of resources; however, the World Bank has been left to react through its own existing resources and facilities.
Poleg tega so zaradi mednarodne finančne krize močno ogrožene prav mnoge zelo revno države, ki pa verjetno ne bodo prejele podpore Mednarodnega denarnega sklada ali Svetovne banke, ker ne izpolnjujejo zahtev glede kreditne sposobnosti posojilojemalca in dokazila „uspešnosti”.
Furthermore, many of the very poor countries are precisely the ones which are highly at risk from the international financial crisis, but those countries are unlikely to receive assistance from either the IMF or the World Bank, as they are unable to meet the requirements concerning borrower creditworthiness and a record of 'good performance'.
S kakšno strategijo se namerava Komisija odzvati na potrebe teh držav?
What is the Commission's strategy with a view to responding to the needs of these countries?
V mednarodnem odzivu na krizo se kažejo težave z upravljanjem brettonwoodskih institucij, saj tem ne uspe zagotoviti podpore državam v razvoju, ki bi to pomoč najbolj potrebovale.
The international response to the crisis highlights problems with Bretton Woods governance's failure to provide assistance to the neediest developing countries.
Kako Komisija podpira reforme teh institucij, zlasti da bi državam v razvoju omogočila, da ohranijo lastna sredstva v svojih državah, ter zaustavila nezakonite finančne tokove, ki so pogubni za njihov razvoj?
How is the Commission promoting reform of the Bretton Woods institutions, particularly with a view to enabling developing countries to keep their own resources within their borders and eradicate illicit financial flows, which are detrimental to their development?
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti več posluha za države z nizkimi prihodki, njihovo boljšo zastopanost in več občutka za njihove potrebe v mednarodnih finančnih institucijah?
How does the Commission plan to ensure a greater voice and representation for low-income countries and a greater sensitivity to their needs within international financial institutions?
Evropska komisija namerava predčasno za takojšnje ukrepe nameniti 8,8 milijard EUR za razvojno pomoč, proračunsko podporo ter financiranje kmetijstva in je predlagala, da se s 500 milijoni EUR z začasnim mehanizmom FLEX za posebej prizadete države podprejo socialni izdatki v državah v razvoju.
The Commission intends to frontload € 8.8 billion of development aid, budget support and agricultural financing for immediate action, and has proposed that € 500 million be allocated to supporting social spending in developing countries through the ad hoc vulnerability FLEX mechanism.
Ali ne bi bilo smiselno osredotočiti proračunske podpore na področja, kot so zdravje, dostojno delo, izobraževanje, infrastruktura financiranja, socialne storitve in ekološka rast v obliki sektorske proračunske pomoči?
Would it not make sense to focus budget support on the fields of health, decent work and education and on financing infrastructure, social services and green growth by means of sectoral budget support?
Kako bo Komisija v prihodnjih letih zapolnila vrzel v financiranju, ki je nastala s sedanjo predčasno proračunsko pomočjo?
How will the Commission fill the funding gap caused in future years by frontloading budget support now?
Obseg uradne razvojne pomoči je premajhen, da bi z njim krili potrebe držav v razvoju, ki so se zaradi krize močno povečale.
ODA volumes are not sufficient to meet the vastly increased needs in developing countries caused by the crisis.
Kakšne inovativne mehanizme financiranja predlaga Komisija in kako namerava zagotoviti, da bodo države članice uporabile obstoječe mehanizme za rešitev tega problema?
What proposals will the Commission make for innovative funding mechanisms, and how is it proposing to ensure that Member States use the existing mechanisms to address this problem?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0089/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0089/09
Zadeva: Odškodnina za potnike v primeru stečaja letalske družbe
Subject: Passenger compensation in the event of airline bankruptcy
V Evropski uniji je od leta 2000 propadlo skupno 77 letalskih družb, nazadnje Sky Europe s sedežem na Slovaškem.
There have been a total of 77 airline bankruptcies in the European Union since 2000, the latest being Sky Europe, based in Slovakia.
V tem primeru, pa tudi v številnih drugih, so potniki kar obtičali; pogosto v počitniških krajih, včasih brez nastanitve, najpogosteje pa so si morali poiskati še let domov.
In this latest case, and in many others, passengers are left stranded, often at holiday destinations, sometimes without accommodation, and very often faced with the need to find a flight home.
Odškodnina se pogosto ne plača, še posebej izpostavljeni pa so potniki, ki svojega potovanja niso rezervirali s kreditno kartico ali v potovalni agenciji.
Compensation is very often not paid, passengers who have not used a credit card or travel agency when booking being especially vulnerable.
Splošni položaj na trgu je, da je vse več nizkocenovnih letalskih prevoznikov, katerih delež na trgu počitniških letov je precej velik, počitniških paketov pa je vse manj.
The overall market context is one of increased passenger numbers for Low Cost Carriers (LCCs), who now have a significant share of the holiday flight market, and a decline in package holidays.
Kupce počitniških paketov varuje direktiva o paketnem potovanju (direktiva Sveta 90/314/EGS ).
The Package Travel Directive (Council Directive 90/314/EEC ) protects package holidaymakers.
Osnovna zavarovalna odgovornost letalske družbe v primeru smrti ali poškodbe je opredeljena v Uredbi št. 2027/97 .
Basic airline liability for death or injury as a result of an accident is defined in Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 .
Zavarovalne zahteve za letalske operaterje za odgovornost do drugih in tretjih oseb zajema Uredba (ES) št. 785/2004 , zavrnitev vkrcanja pa Uredba (ES) št. 261/2004 .
Airline operator insurance requirements for second and third person liability are covered by Regulation (EC) No 785/2004 and denied boarding by Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 .
Nikjer v zakonodaji EU pa ni obravnavano varstvo potnikov v primeru nesolventnosti letalske družbe.
Nowhere, however, in EU legislation is passenger protection against airline insolvency addressed.
Kako namerava Evropska komisija zapolniti to vrzel?
How does the Commission intend to close this loophole?
Ali bo pripravila posebno zakonodajo, ki bo omogočila varstvo potnikov v primeru nesolventnosti letalske družbe?
Will it bring forward specific legislation to provide passengers with protection against airline insolvency?
Ali bo predlagala revizijo zakonodaje o stečaju, tako da bo zajela tudi primere, kakršen je Sky Europe?
Or will the Commission propose a revision of any relevant legislation on bankruptcy to include cases like Sky Europe?
Katere možnosti vidi Komisija, da bi vzpostavili rezervni odškodninski sklad iz prispevkov letalskih operaterjev?
What scope does the Commission see for establishing a reserve compensation fund derived from airline operators' contributions?
UL L 158, 23.6.1990, str.
OJ L 158, 23.6.1990, p.
UL L 285, 17.10.1997, str.
OJ L 285, 17.10.1997, p.
UL L 138, 30.4.2004, str.
OJ L 138, 30.4.2004, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0090/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0090/09
Zadeva: Podnebne spremembe in države v razvoju v okviru konference Združenih narodov o podnebnih spremembah, ki bo potekala v Københavnu
Subject: Climate change and developing countries in the context of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen
Z vidika razvoja je treba sporazum o podnebnih spremembah za čas po letu 2012 uskladiti z obstoječimi razvojnimi procesi na mednarodni (npr. razvojni cilji tisočletja) in nacionalni ravni.
From a development perspective, the post-2012 climate change agreement needs to be reconciled with the existing development processes at international level (e.g. MDGs) and at national level.