natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Obenem bi razvrednotilo stališče večine držav članic EU, ki si želijo konec oboroževalne tekme z jedrskim orožjem, in spodkopalo dolgotrajno podporo EU mednarodnemu načelu pravne države, pa tudi sodbo Mednarodnega sodišča z dne 8. julija 1996 o nezakonitosti jedrskega orožja.
It would also devalue the position of most EU Member States who want to see an end to the nuclear weapons race and undermine the EU's longstanding support for international rule of law, including the 8 July 1996 ruling of the International Court on the illegality of nuclear weapons.
Kako se predsedstvo EU odziva na stališče, da sta britanska in francoska vlada s tem dejanjem kršili člen VI Pogodbe o neširjenju jedrskega orožja, ki pogodbenice obvezuje, da si v dobri veri prizadevajo za pogajanja o učinkovitih ukrepih za čimprejšnjo ukinitev oboroževalne tekme z jedrskim orožjem in za jedrsko razorožitev ter o pogodbi o splošni in popolni razorožitvi pod strogim in učinkovitim mednarodnim nadzorom?
How does the EU presidency respond to views that see the British and French governments' move in breach of article VI of the NPT treaty, which obliges each of the Parties to the Treaty to undertake 'to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control'?
Kako lahko predsedstvo EU upraviči svoje namene, glede na to, da svetovnemu režimu za nadzor nad jedrskim orožjem grozi popoln zlom ter obstaja resna nevarnost oboroževalne tekme z jedrskim orožjem, ob upoštevanju neuspeha pregledne konference NPT in vrha ZN o reformah?
How can the EU presidency justify its intentions in view of the serious threats of a complete breakdown of the worldwide nuclear weapons control regime, and the real dangers of a nuclear arms race, in view of the failure of the NPT review conference and the UN Reform Summit this year?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0105/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0105/05
Zadeva: Revizija Cotonoujskega sporazuma
Subject: Revision of the Cotonou Agreement
Spremenjeni Sporazum iz Cotonouja za razliko od prejšnjih sporazumov ne vsebuje določb, ki bi urejale finančni okvir.
Unlike earlier agreements the Cotonou Agreement does not contain any provisions relating to the financial framework.
Pogajanja o tej točki še niso zaključena, deloma zaradi še vedno odprte razprave glede vključitve ERS v proračun in glede finančnega načrta.
The negotiations on that topic were inconclusive, partly on account of the fact that the debate on bringing the EDF into the budget and on the financial perspective is still proceeding.
Nov večletni finančni okvir se mora začeti 1. januarja 2008.
The new multiannual financial framework is due to take effect on 1 January 2008.
Po zaključku pogajanj o spremembi Sporazuma iz Cotonouja so se države članice med zasedanjem Evropskega sveta 16. in 17. junija 2005, na konferenci Združenih narodov o razvojnih ciljih tisočletja ali znotraj skupine G8 zavezale, da bodo bistveno povečale sredstva za uradno razvojno pomoč.
In the period since the negotiations on the revision of the Cotonou Agreement were concluded the Member States have on a number of occasions (at the 16-17 June 2005 European Council, at the UN Conference on the Millennium Development Objectives and in certain cases under the G8 umbrella) given further undertakings to the effect that public development aid (PDA) will be substantially increased.
Svet si je zadal nalogo, da do 30. septembra 2005 v skladu s spremenjenim Sporazumom iz Cotonouja opredeli natančen znesek večletnega finančnega načrta sodelovanja in obdobje njegove uporabe.
The Council set itself the target of 30 September 2005 as the date for establishing the precise amount (and the period of application) of the multiannual cooperation financial framework under the revised Cotonou Agreement.
Evropski parlament v postopku privolitve ne more podati svojega mnenja o spremenjenem Sporazumu iz Cotonouja vse dokler znesek ni natančno določen.
The European Parliament will not be able to express any view on the amended Agreement pursuant to the assent procedure until the precise amount has been set.
Ali Svet dalje lahko obrazloži, kako namerava pri večletnem finančnem načrtu sodelovanja AKP upoštevati nedavno sprejete politične zaveze o bistvenem povečanju uradne razvojne pomoči?
Would the Council also say how it intends to ensure that the new policy statements concerning a substantial increase in PDA are reflected in the multiannual ACP cooperation financial framework?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0106/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0106/05
Zadeva: Prenehanje veljavnosti Direktive 1999/85/ES, ki zadeva znižano stopnjo DDV za delovno intenzivne storitve
Subject: The expiry of Directive 1999/85/EC concerning reduced VAT rates on labour-intensive services
Direktiva 1999/85/ES , ki zadeva DDV za delovno intenzivne storitve, kjer je določanje znižane stopnje DDV-ja pri določenih delovno intenzivnih storitvah dovoljeno, vendar samo v poskusnem obdobju, bo prenehala veljati 31. decembra 2005.
On 31 December 2005, Directive 1999/85/EC concerning VAT on labour-intensive services, which allow the application of a reduced VAT rate to certain specified labour-intensive services but only for an experimental period, will expire.
Medtem ko je bilo v devetih državah članicah poskusno obdobje že dvakrat podaljšano na skupno dobo 6 let izvajanja ter je Komisijin zakonodajni predlog (COM(2003)0397/končno), o katerem se je že posvetovala z Evropskim parlamentom in je ta podal svoje mnenje v Poročilu o predlogu za direktivo Sveta, ki spreminja Direktivo 77/388/EEC o znižani stopnji davka na dodano vrednost (COM(2003)0397/končno – C5-0359/2003 – 2003/0169(CNS)), ki ga je vložila Christa RANDZIO-PLATH, je Svet onemogočil, da se vsem državam članicam dovoli določanje znižane stopnje davka na dodano vrednost.
While the experimental period has been extended twice, adding up to a total of six years of implementation in nine Member States, the Commission's legislative proposal (COM(2003)0397/final) on which the European Parliament has already been consulted and gave its opinion in the report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC as regards reduced rates of value added tax (COM(2003)0397/final – C5-0359/2003 – 2003/0169(CNS)) by Christa RANDZIO-PLATH, which would extend to all Member States the option of applying reduced rates of VAT, has been blocked in the Council.
Ko ta Direktiva preneha veljati, bodo morale države članice povišati stopnje DDV-ja na osnovno stopnjo.
When this Directive expires, Member States will be immediately obliged to increase VAT rates to the standard rate.
Kakšen bo po mnenju Komisije vpliv povišanja stopnje DDV-ja v omenjenih sektorjih na zaposlenost v Evropi?
In the Commission's view, what would be the likely effect on employment in Europe if increased VAT rates were to be applied in those sectors concerned?
Kako Komisija razume možen prihodnji razvoj na Svetu in ali podpira njegove dosedanje ukrepe glede kompromisa, ki sta ga predlagala luksemburško in britansko predsedstvo v letu 2005?
In the context of the compromise suggested by the Luxembourg and UK Presidencies throughout 2005, how does the Commission perceive possible future developments in the Council, and does it support the steps undertaken so far?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena podpirati mnenje Evropskega parlamenta, predstavljenega v prej omenjenem poročilu Randzio-Plath o razširitvi poskusa na vse zainteresirane države članice v primeru, da Svet ne bo hotel skleniti kompromisa?
In the event of failure to achieve a compromise in the Council, is the Commission prepared to defend the European Parliament's opinion, as presented in the Randzio-Plath report referred to above and extend the experiment to all interested Member States?
Ali, kot drugo možnost, pripraviti predlog, s katerim bi si prizadevala, da se zadevnim devetim državam članicam še naprej omogoči uporabo znižane stopnje DDV-ja?
Or as another option, would it present a proposal aimed at allowing those nine Member States concerned to continue applying a reduced VAT rate?
UL L 277, 28.10.1999, str.
OJ L 277, 28.10.1999, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0107/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0107/05
Zadeva: Ministrska konferenca Svetovne trgovinske organizacije v Hong Kongu
Subject: WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong
Ali lahko Svet oceni izid in zaključke šeste Ministrske konference Svetovne trgovinske organizacije v Hong Kongu in opredeli svoja stališča o naslednjih korakih, ki jih je potrebno narediti?
Can the Council evaluate the results and conclusions of the Sixth WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong and set out its views on the next steps to be taken?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0108/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0108/05
Ali lahko Komisija oceni izid in zaključke šeste Ministrske konference Svetovne trgovinske organizacije v Hong Kongu in opredeli svoja stališča o naslednjih korakih, ki jih je potrebno narediti?
Can the Commission evaluate the results and conclusions of the Sixth WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong and set out its views on the next steps to be taken?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0109/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0109/05
Zadeva: Razvoj na Slovaškem - zmanjševanje delavskih pravic slovaškega policijskega sindikata in remilitarizacija slovaških policijskih enot
Subject: Development in Slovakia - Undermining of the labour rights of the Slovak Police Union and the remilitarisation of the Slovakian police force
Slovaška vlada je remilitarizirala svoje policijske enote, kar pomeni, da bodo imela vojaška sodišča pristojnost nad policijskimi enotami, železniško policijo, pazniki, varnostniki na sodišču, nacionalnimi varnostnimi organi in cariniki v času miru in vojne.
The Slovakian Government has 'remilitarised' its police force, which means that military courts will have jurisdiction over members of the police force, the railway police, the prison and court guard, the National Security Authority and customs officers - in terms of peace and war.
Policijske enote bodo v času vojne ali vojnega stanja vojaške enote.
The police will be considered as soldiers in times of war or when the country is in a war footing.
Dejansko bo od leta 2006 dalje slovaške državljane nadzorovala vojska.
In practical terms, this means that Slovak citizens will be policed by the military as of 2006.
Slovaški policijski sindikat OzP Slovaška je organiziral zakonit protest, ki se ga je udeležilo 3000 policistov.
The Slovak Police Union, OzP Slovakia, organised a lawful demonstration in which over 3 000 police officers took part.
Ali lahko Komisija nemudoma razjasni, ali ukrepi Slovaške vlade predstavljajo kršitev člena 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji?
Can the Commission clarify, as a matter of urgency, whether the actions of the Slovakian Government constitute an infringement of Article 6 of the TEU?
Temelj za vzpostavitev skupnega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice v EU, kot določa naslov 6 Pogodbe EU, je zagotoviti, da imajo vsi državljani EU enako visoko raven standardov kazenskega pregona.
A primary condition for the establishment of a common area of freedom, security and justice in the EU, as established in Title VI of the TEU, is to ensure that citizens employ the same high level of law enforcement standards throughout the EU.
Kako naj policija varuje demokratične pravice EU, če nima enakih pravic kot drugi državljani EU?
How can the police be expected to cherish our EU democratic rights if they do not have the same rights as other EU citizens?
Odločitev o remilitarizaciji pomeni omejitev individualnih pravic policistov, ki so jim bile zagotovljene z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah in Listino o temeljnih pravicah in svoboščinah, zlasti v členih 5 in 6, ki poudarjata pravico vseh državljanov do enakega dostopa in nepristranskega sojenja.
The decision to remilitarise constitutes a restriction of the individual rights of police officers guaranteed in the European Convention on Human Rights and their Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, in particular Article 5 and 6 thereof, which guarantee that all citizens have the right to equal access to the law and a fair trial.
To je povezano z nepristranskostjo civilnih sodnikov.
This involves the impartiality of civilian judges.
Sodniki na vojaških sodiščih so člani vojaškega osebja in tako policisti ne bi imeli enakih pravic kot drugi državljani EU.
However, in military courts, judges are military personnel, and police officers would, therefore, not have the same rights as other EU citizens.
Odločitev slovaške vlade zato ni v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo in priporočilom 2000/10 odbora ministrov Sveta Evrope o evropskem kodeksu policijske etike.
The Slovak Government's decision is, therefore, not in line with the European Convention and Recommendation 2000/10 on the European Code of Police Ethics of the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers.
Članstvo Evropske unije, kot ga določajo kopenhagenski kriteriji, od vseh držav članic EU zahteva, da spoštujejo svoje obveznosti do temeljnih evropskih vrednot.
Membership of the European Union, as stipulated in the Copenhagen Criteria, requires all EU Member States to respect their commitments to our fundamental EU values.
To je popolnoma razvidno iz sklepa Evropskega sveta iz leta 1993.
This is absolutely clear in the Conclusion by the European Council of 1993.
Kako namerava ravnati Komisija, če slovaška vlada ne namerava spoštovati svojih obveznosti kot članica EU?
If the Slovak government is not respecting its obligations as an EU Member State, what action will the Commission take?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0111/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0111/05
Zadeva: Sankcije EU v ribiškem sektorju
Subject: EU sanctions in the fisheries sector
Sankcije za vse hujše kršitve pravil in predpisov EU na področju ribištva je treba okrepiti.
Sanctions must be imposed wherever serious violations of EU fisheries rules and regulations occur.
Trenutno države EU 86 % vseh hujših kršitev v sektorju obravnavajo v upravnih in 14 % v kazenskih postopkih.
EU Member States currently deal with 86% of all serious offences in the sector by means of administrative sanctions, 14% thereof result in criminal proceedings.
Se Komisija strinja z naslednjimi stališči?
Does the Commission share the view that:
Sankcije in kazni v ribiškem sektorju morajo biti v vseh državah članicah EU sorazmerne s storjeno kršitvijo.
sanctions and penalties in the fisheries sector in all EU Member States must be proportionate to the offences committed,
Sankcije morajo biti pravične in ne smejo delati razlik med državljani in nedržavljani.
sanctions must be fair and non-discriminatory as between nationals and non-nationals,
Ravni veljavnih sankcij za podobne kršitve morajo biti med državami članicami usklajene.
the level of sanctions applicable for similar offences must be consistent in all Member States,
Manjše kršitve na področju ribištva je treba dekriminalizirati.
all minor fishery offences should be decriminalised?
Poleg tega, ali Komisija v primeru ravnanja, ki predstavlja hujšo kršitev pravil skupne ribiške politike, daje prednost uporabi upravnih ali kazenskih sankcij?
Furthermore, would the Commission opt for administrative or criminal sanctions in the case of conduct that seriously infringes the rules of the common fisheries policy?
Zanima nas tudi, ali bo Komisija kot nujno ponovno obravnavala vprašanje sankcij v ribiškem sektorju in razmislila o predlogu bolj usklajenega pristopa od trenutnega?
Will the Commission also review the entire issue of sanctions in the fisheries sector as a matter of urgency and consider proposing an approach which is more harmonised than the current approach?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0112/05/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0112/05/rev.1
Zadeva: Stališče Evropske unije do kubanske vlade
Subject: EU position towards the Cuban Government
Za Evropski parlament ostaja nepredstavljivo, da morajo ljudje na Kubi še vedno v zapor zaradi svojih idealov in mirne politične dejavnosti.
For the EP, it remains inconceivable that people continue to be imprisoned in Cuba for their ideals and peaceful political activity.
Zlasti nesprejemljivo in nezaslišano je, da nekateri od teh političnih zapornikov ne dobijo potrebne pomoči in so v zelo slabem zdravstvenem stanju.
It is particularly unacceptable and shocking that some of these political prisoners are not receiving the help they need and are in very poor medical condition.
Evropski parlament je v skladu s svojim dosedanjim trdnim stališčem v svoji resoluciji novembra 2004 poudaril, da predstavlja zagotavljanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin bistven pogoj za spremembo skupnega stališča Evropske unije o Kubi in spremembo ukrepov, sprejetih soglasno 5. junija 2003 (tj. sankcij, uvedenih po odvzemu prostosti in zaprtju 75 disidentov ter kasnejši usmrtitvi treh ugrabiteljev letal).
The EP, in line with former firm positions, stressed, in its resolution of November 2004, that 'the upholding of human rights and fundamental freedoms is an essential condition for any revision of the EU's Common Position on Cuba and the measures adopted unanimously on 5 June 2003' (i.e. sanctions imposed following the arrest and imprisonment of 75 dissidents and the subsequent summary executions of three hijackers).
Svet je v svoji izjavi z dne 13. junija 2005 navedel, da ni zadovoljivega napredka v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami na Kubi.
The Council states, in its declaration of 13 June 2005, that 'there was no satisfactory progress on human rights in Cuba'.
Katere pobude bo Svet sprejel z namenom spodbujanja spoštovanja človekovih pravic in resničnega napredka na poti k pluralistični demokraciji na Kubi?
What kind of initiatives is the Council willing to take in order to promote respect for human rights and real progress towards a pluralist democracy in Cuba?
Ali Svet po nedavnih dogodkih (izgon evropskih poslancev, nenehno zatiranje disidentov) še vedno meni, da so rezultati nove politike zadovoljivi in da je sedanja politika do kubanskih oblasti pravi pristop k izboljšanju razmer na Kubi?
After recent events (expulsion of European parliamentarians, ongoing repression of dissidents), does the Council still think that the results of its new policy are satisfactory and that its present policy with the Cuban authorities is the correct approach to improve the situation in Cuba?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0113/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0113/05
Zadeva: Ogrožanje naravnega okolja in energetske varnosti v povezavi z gradnjo severnoevropskega plinovoda, tako imenovanega baltskega plinovoda
Subject: Threat to the natural environment and energy safety in connection with the construction of the North European Gas Pipeline, the so-called Baltic Pipeline
Leta 2000 je bil projektu severnoevropskega plinovoda bil priznan status vseevropske energetske mreže v skupnem interesu Evropske unije.
In 2000 the North European Gas Pipeline project was granted the status of a trans-European energy network of common interest for the European Union.
Poglobljena analiza o načrtovanem plinovodu pa je pokazala znatne težave, o katerih se doslej ni govorilo.
However, an in-depth analysis of the planned pipeline indicated the existence of significant problems which have not so far been discussed.
Analiza kaže negativen vpliv na naravno okolje v območju Baltskega morja in ogrožanje energetske varnosti v delu držav članic EU v srednji in vzhodni Evropi.
These include a negative impact on the natural environment of the Baltic Sea basin and a threat to the energy safety of some EU Member States from Central and Eastern Europe.
Težave postavljajo pod vprašaj odločitev o gradnji baltskega plinovoda, z bližajočim se začetkom gradbenih del pa se povečuje nujnost, da se ta vprašanja razjasnijo.
The problems call into question the decision to construct the Baltic Pipeline, and the urgency of having them explained increases with the nearing deadline for the scheduled start of the construction work.
Baltik je plitvo morje z majhnim pretokom vode in ima zato precejšen potencial za zbiranje nevarnih snovi.
The Baltic is a shallow sea with little water exchange, and consequently considerable potential to accumulate hazardous substances.
Zaradi edinstvenega in izredno občutljivega ekosistema mu je Mednarodna pomorska organizacija podelila status posebej občutljivega morskega območja.
As a unique and sensitive ecosystem it has been given the status of a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA) by the International Maritime Organisation.
Že danes je morsko dno Baltika onesnaženo z več tisoč tonami kovin z ladij iz obdobja druge svetovne vojne, pa tudi s kemičnim orožjem.
The Baltic seabed is already littered with thousands of tonnes of metal originating from ships dating back to WW2, as well as chemical weapons.
Podvodna pot plinovoda meri 1189 km.
The underwater route is to measure 1189 km.
Odločitev podjetij, ki sodelujejo pri gradnji in želijo z dodatnim plinovodom povečati zmogljivosti, stopnjuje grožnjo onesnaževanja okolja.
The decision of companies involved in the building process to increase capacity and construct an additional gas pipe heightens the threat of environmental pollution.
Pri tem je potrebno upoštevati dejstvo, da bo delovanje baltskega plinovoda negativno vplivalo na energetsko varnost osmih držav Evropske unije od Baltika do srednjevzhodne Evrope.
One should also consider the fact that the operation of the Baltic pipeline will have a negative impact on the energy safety of eight countries of the European Union from the Baltic States and Central-Eastern Europe.
Ne samo, da bo tem državam odvzeta možnost pridobiti plin iz alternativnih virov, ampak se bo s tem znižal tudi tranzitni pomen obstoječih plinovodov Yamal I in Brotherhood.
It will not only rob them of the possibility of receiving gas from alternative sources, but it will also reduce the transit significance of the two existing pipelines, i.e. Yamal I and Brotherhood.
Polega tega je strošek baltskega plinovoda vsaj trikrat večji kot gradnja alternativnih plinovodov Yamal II ali Amber.
In addition, the cost of the Baltic Pipeline is at least three times higher than the construction of an alternative pipeline like Yamal II or Amber.
Kdaj in kako načrtuje Evropska komisija, da se bo soočila z vprašanjem baltskega plinovoda in kakšne ukrepe bo sprejela glede varstva ogroženega okolja ob Baltskem morju?
When and how does the Commission plan to deal with the question of the Baltic Pipeline and what steps will be taken concerning the protection of the threatened environment of the Baltic Sea?
Kako namerava Komisija preprečiti diskriminacijo in marginalizacijo držav članic EU iz srednje in vzhodne Evrope v skupni energetski politiki EU?
Moreover, how does the EC intend to prevent discrimination against and the marginalisation of EU Member States from Central and Eastern Europe in relation to the common EU energy policy?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0114/05
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0114/05
Zadeva: Dejavnosti Evropske unije na področju razorožitve, demobilizacije in reintegracije borcev - stik z misijami ESDP
Subject: Activities of the European Union in the field of Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration of Combatants (DDR) - link with ESDP missions
Evropska unija/Skupnost že nekaj let troši sredstva za programe vzpostavljanja miru, kot so razoroževanje, demobilizacija in reintegracija nekdanjih borcev v razmerah po končanem konfliktu.
For several years now, the European Union/European Community has been devoting resources to peacebuilding programmes such as Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration of former combatants in post-conflict situations.
Takšne pobude zagotavljajo, da programi EU in drugih darovalcev za ponovno obnovo in razvoj v konfliktnih območjih dejansko lahko vodijo do stalnega miru.
Such programmes are vital in ensuring that EU and other donors’ programmes of reconstruction and development in conflict areas actually lead to a sustainable peace.