natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Potem ko je prišlo do razkritja finančno-političnega poloma Grčije in Nemčija, sicer država članica EU, ni bila pripravljena ponuditi brezpogojne pomoči Grčiji, posamezne države članice, pa tudi predstavniki Komisije, nemški vladi posredno očitajo, da ravna „neevropsko“.
Since the Greek financial policy crisis was revealed and Germany, an EU Member State, was not prepared to provide Greece with unconditional help, some Member States – and also some Commission representatives – have implicitly accused the German Government of acting in an ‘un-European’ fashion.
Ali je po mnenju Komisije določena država članica EU „neevropska“, ker je v nasprotju z drugimi državami članicami še dovolj finančno močna, da bi lahko ponudila pomoč, a ima prav v času gospodarske krize obveznost do davkoplačevalcev, da natančno preveri vse dodatne odhodke in jih pod določenimi pogoji tudi zavrne?
In the Commission’s view, is a Member State ‘un-European’ if it, in contrast to other Member States, still has the financial power to provide help but, particularly in times of economic crisis, has a duty towards its tax payers to precisely check and, where applicable, reject all additional expenditure?
Kakšen signal bi z brezpogojno rešitvijo Grčije poslali Italiji, Irski, Španiji in Portugalski, ki jih je gospodarska kriza prav tako močno prizadela?
What message would an unconditional rescue of Greece send to Italy, Ireland, Spain and Portugal, which are also seriously affected by the economic crisis?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0162/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0162/10
Zadeva: Ryanair ne sprejema osebnih izkaznic in vozniških dovoljenj
Subject: Ryanair's rejection of identity cards and driving licences
Z marsikatero politiko nizkocenovnega letalskega prevoznika Ryanair se jaz ali pa moji volivci ne bi strinjali.
There are many policies employed by budget airline Ryanair which I or my constituents could take issue with.
Čeprav se je družba izkazala za eno najuspešnejših irskih podjetij v približno zadnjih dveh desetletjih, imajo številni potniki zaradi njenega varčnega pristopa tudi in predvsem negativne izkušnje.
Though the company has proved itself to be one of the most successful Irish businesses of the last two decades or so, its frugal approach has also caused notably negative experiences for many travellers.
Ena od politik te družbe pa je imela še posebej negativne posledice ta teden, ko so v Dublinu začasno zaprli urad za potne liste.
However, one of its company policies had a particularly negative effect this week when the passport office in Dublin was temporarily shut down.
Številni ljudje zaradi stavke na uradu za potne liste niso dobili novih potnih listov in so se bili prisiljeni zanesti na druge potovalne dokumente.
As a result of industrial action at the passport office, many people did not get new passports and were forced to rely on other documents to travel.
Ker pa Ryanair kot veljaven osebni dokument sprejema le potne liste, ne pa tudi osebnih izkaznic in vozniških dovoljenj, ki jih izda država, številni potniki niso mogli potovati.
However, because Ryanair only accept passports as valid identification and rejects government-issued identity cards or driving licences, many travellers were unable to travel.
Ali je to, da Ryanair za svoje lete ne sprejema osebnih izkaznic in vozniških dovoljenj, ki jih izda država, kot veljavnih osebnih dokumentov, zakonito?
Is it legal for Ryanair to reject government-issued identity cards and driving licences as valid proof of identification on their flights?
Ali bi bilo mogoče Ryanir prisiliti k sprejemanju teh dokumentov?
Could Ryanair be forced to accept these documents?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0163/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0163/10
Zadeva: Prepoved proizvodnje in prodaje dimetilfumarata
Subject: Ban on the production and marketing of dimethyl fumarate
Pohištveno trgovsko podjetje Conforama je v Franciji prodajalo kavče in fotelje, ki jih je izdelalo kitajsko podjetje Linkwise in ki so vsebovali dimetilfumarat.
In France, sofas and armchairs manufactured by the Chinese company Linkwise and containing dimethyl fumarate have been sold by the furniture chain Conforama.
Po znanih podatkih so izzvali alergijo pri 128 osebah.
128 people are known to have suffered ill effects from these ‘allergenic’ chairs and sofas.
Zaradi niza resnih zdravstvenih problemov, ki so prizadeli potrošnike več evropskih držav (Francija, Finska, Poljska, Velika Britanija, Švedska), je Evropska unija s 1. majem 2009 prepovedala prodajo izdelkov, ki vsebujejo dimetilfumarat, ter odredila, da se tiste, ki so že na trgu, s prodaje umakne vsaj za eno leto.
Following a number of serious health problems affecting consumers in several European countries (France, Finland, Poland, the United Kingdom and Sweden), the EU banned the marketing of products containing dimethyl fumarate from 1 May 2009 and ordered contaminated products that were still available on the market to be recalled for a period of at least one year.
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, če je temu začasnemu preklicu sledila dokončna prepoved na ravni celotne Evropske unije?
Can the Commission say whether this temporary ban was followed by a definitive ban throughout the EU as a whole?
Ali lahko nadalje pojasni, ali lahko proizvajalci iz tretjih držav ta nedovoljeni biocid še vedno uporabljajo in v Evropsko unijo izvažajo izdelke, ki vsebujejo dimeatilfumarat?
Can it also say whether manufacturers in non-Member States can still use this unauthorised biocide and then export products containing dimethyl fumarate to the EU?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0164/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0164/10
Zadeva: Uporaba španskega zakona o zaščiti obalnega pasu
Subject: Application of Spain's Coastal Protection Law
Ali Svet meni, da so z deloma retroaktivno uporabo španskega zakona o zaščiti obalnega pasu kršene lastninske pravice tamkajšnjih lastnikov zemljišč, zlasti glede na dejstvo, da so razlastitve v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah (Protokol 1, člen 1) in Evropsko listino o temeljnih pravicah (člen 17) mogoče le po rednem postopku in za primerno odškodnino, in kako namerava Svet ukrepati proti možnim kršitvam?
So far as the Council is aware, does the - in some cases retrospective - application of Spain's Coastal Protection Law violate the property rights of owners of the land parcels affected by it, with particular reference to the fact that under the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 1 of Protocol 1) and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights (Article 17) expropriations are permitted only in accordance with a duly regulated procedure and with appropriate compensation, and what action will the Council take against these potential violations of rights?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0165/10/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION H-0165/10/rev.1
Zadeva: Stavkokaški ukrepi proti egiptovskim ribičem
Subject: Strike-breaking measures against Egyptian fishermen
Stavkajoči egiptovski ribiči na območju Mihanione v Grčiji so bili žrtev napadov zoper življenje in fizično nedotakljivost, ki so jih izvedli plačanci njihovih delodajalcev, očitno pa je kršena tudi njihova pravica do stavke.
Striking Egyptian fishermen in the region of Michaniona have been subjected to attacks on their lives and physical integrity by thugs hired by their employers, while their right to strike is being flagrantly violated.
Poleg tega je bila sodba o tožbi, ki jo je vložil sindikat egiptovskih ribičev, preložena na 14. april, kar daje lastnikom ladij možnost, da še naprej mirno zaposlujejo stavkokaze.
Moreover, a ruling on the complaint filed by the Egyptian fishermen’s trade union has been postponed until 14 April, thus giving the shipowners free rein to continue hiring strike-breakers.
Ali Komisija obsoja te napade delodajalcev na priseljene delavce in dejstvo, da se je OAED spremenila v stavkokaški mehanizem?
Does the Commission condemn these attacks on immigrant workers by their employers, and the transformation of the OAED into a strike-breaking mechanism?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0166/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0166/10
Kako ocenjuje Svet uporabo španskega zakona o zaščiti obalnega pasu, ki omogoča, da se brez odškodnine razlasti zemljišča, vnesena v zemljiško knjigo in pridobljena v skladu z zakonom, zlasti glede na dejstvo, da so razlastitve v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah in Evropsko listino o temeljnih pravicah mogoče le po rednem postopku in za primerno odškodnino, in kako namerava Svet ukrepati proti kršitvam lastninskih pravic državljanov EU?
What is the Council's assessment of the application of Spain's Coastal Protection Law, which involves expropriation without compensation of land parcels entered in the land register which have been lawfully acquired, with particular reference to the fact that under the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights expropriations are permitted only in accordance with a duly regulated procedure and with appropriate compensation, and what action will the Council take against these violations of the property rights of EU citizens?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0167/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0167/10
Zadeva: Odstop letalskega prometa monopolnim družbam
Subject: Surrender of the air transport sector to monopolistic groups
Načrtovana združitev družb Olympic Air in Aegean Airlines – rezultat politike privatizacij in „liberalizacije“, ki jih spodbuja Evropska unija, v Grčiji pa tako sedanja vlada stranke PASOK kot prejšnja vlada Nove demokracije – krepi nastajanje monopolov na trgu zračnega prometa, kar pa ima negativne posledice za prebivalstvo in zaposlene v letalskem sektorju.
The planned merger between Olympic Air and Aegean Airlines – a result of the privatisation and liberalisation policy promoted by the European Union and the PASOK and ND governments in Greece – fosters the creation of monopolies in the air transport market, with damaging effects for the general public and for workers in the sector.
Posledice privatizacije družbe Olympic Airlines (O.A.) – odpuščanja, zniževanje plač, čedalje več dela za tiste, ki so obdržali delovna mesta, podražitve cen letalskih vozovnic in zmanjšanje števila letalskih povezav, zlasti na deficitarnih linijah – se bodo še stopnjevale, končni rezultat pa bo slabša kakovost letalskega prometa.
The dismissals, wage cuts and heavier workloads for the remaining staff, ticket price hikes and service reductions – particularly on unprofitable lines – which followed the privatisation of Olympic Airlines (OA) will increase, leading to the further deterioration of air transport.
4500 oseb, ki jih je družba Olympic Airlines že odpustila, od 15. decembra 2009 še vedno ni prejelo nadomestila, ki jim po zakonu pripada, postopki za dodelitev polne pokojnine osebam, ki izpolnjujejo zahtevane pogoje, ter postopki za preusmeritev ostalih delavcev v druge javne sektorje, pa so na mrtvi točki.
The 4 500 workers already dismissed by Olympic Airlines have not received the payments to which they are legally entitled since 15 December 2009 and the procedures for giving qualifying workers a full pension and transferring remaining workers to other public services are at a standstill.
Bi lahko zato Komisija prosim odgovorila na naslednja vprašanja: Ali se je privatizacija družbe Olympic Airlines izvedla zato, da bi imela od nje koristi monopolne družbe?
Were Olympic Airlines privatised in order to benefit monopolistic groups?
Kaj Komisija meni o: a) načrtovani združitvi družb Olympic Air in Aegean Airlines , ter b) prevari in težavah delavcev, ki jih je odpustila družba Olympic Airlines ?
What is the Commission’s view regarding: a) the planned merger between Olympic Air and Aegean Airlines and b) the deceit and problems to which the workers dismissed by Olympic Airlines are being subjected?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0168/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0168/10
Zadeva: Izvajanje evropskih konkurenčnih pravil na notranjem trgu s plinom
Subject: Application of EU competition rules on the EU single gas market
Čeprav je bila v Evropski uniji razglašena vzpostavitev notranjega trga s plinom, ima v nekaterih držav članicah monopol na trgu s plinom podjetje iz tretje države (Gazprom), ki neposredno ali posredno nadzoruje oskrbo ter prenosna in distribucijska omrežja s plinom.
Although we proclaim the creation of a single gas market in the EU, the same third-country company (Gazprom), occupying what is essentially a monopoly position on the gas market, manages gas supply, transmission and distribution networks in certain Member States, either directly or through intermediaries.
Takšne razmere negativno vplivajo na pogodbe teh držav z dobavitelji plina, cene plina pa so pogoste neugodne za končnega potrošnika.
This has an adverse effect on those Member States’ contracts with gas suppliers and often leads to unfavourable gas prices for end users.
Kako namerava Komisija zagotoviti preglednost in konkurenčnost energetskega trga EU, ob upoštevanju tretjega energetskega svežnja EU in še zlasti določb iz člena 11 direktive 2009/73/ES z dne 13. julija 2009 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z zemeljskim plinom?
How is the Commission planning to safeguard transparency and competition on the EU energy market in view of the EU’s third energy package and particularly the provisions of Article 11 of Directive 2009/73/EC of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas?
Ali namerava Komisija državam, ki so v veliki meri odvisne od enega samega zunanjega dobavitelja, pomagati pri pogajanjih o ceni plina, da bi se izognili cenovnim nesorazmerjem?
When it comes to gas price negotiations, does the Commission intend to assist those countries that are largely dependent on one external source in order to prevent price distortion?
Ali bo Komisija preučila, ali Gazprom, s tem ko ima monopol v več državah članicah, krši konkurenčne predpise na notranjem trgu EU s plinom ter zlorablja svoj vladajoči položaj na trgu?
Is the Commission planning to investigate whether or not Gazprom’s monopoly position in individual Member States distorts competition rules and whether or not this allows Gazprom to abuse its dominant market position?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0169/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0169/10
Zadeva: Članstvo Tajvana v mednarodnih organizacijah
Subject: Taiwan's membership of international organisations
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0170/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0170/10
Zadeva: Prošnja irske vlade za pomoč ob poplavah
Subject: Irish Government application for flood relief
Januarja 2010 je irska vlada predložila Komisiji vlogo za pomoč zaradi poplav, ki so prizadele državo konec leta 2009.
In January 2010, the Irish Government submitted an application to the Commission for relief to assist those affected by flooding in Ireland in late 2009.
Ali lahko Komisija poroča o trenutnem stanju vloge?
Can the Commission provide an update on the status of that application?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0171/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0171/10
Zadeva: Bližnjevzhodni mirovni proces
Subject: The Middle East Peace Process
Ali lahko Evropski svet na novo oceni napredek pri bližnjevzhodnem mirovnem procesu?
Can the Council provide an updated assessment of the status of the Middle East Peace Process?
Kaj je Evropski svet ukrenil, da bi spodbudil izvajanje Goldstonovega poročila?
What actions have been undertaken by the Council to promote the implementation of the Goldstone Report?
Ali lahko Evropski svet zagotovi najnovejše informacije o prizadevanjih za izpustitev zajetega izraelskega vojaka Gilada Šalita?
Can the Council provide an update on efforts to release the captured Israeli soldier Mr Gilad Shalit?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0172/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0172/10
Zadeva: Strategija EU za širokopasovne povezave
Subject: EU Broadband Strategy
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kakšne ukrepe bo sprejela za spodbujanje dostopa do hitrega interneta po vsej Evropski uniji, zlasti na podeželju?
Can the Commission outline what measures it will undertake to promote access to high-speed internet across the European Union and in particular in rural areas?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0173/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0173/10
Zadeva: Dokončanje antwerpenske obvoznice
Subject: Completion of the ring road round Antwerp
Flamska vlada je sklenila, da Komisiji, tako kot določa odločba o vseevropskih prometnih omrežjih, predloži osnutke načrta za gradnjo novega predora, s katerim bi dokončali gradnjo antwerpenske obvoznice in zagotovili spoštovanje minimalnih varnostnih zahtev iz direktive 2004/54/ES glede varnosti predorov.
To be sure of complying with all provisions of the Tunnel Directive (Directive 2004/54/EC ), the Flemish Government has decided to refer to the Commission the preliminary draft plans for a new tunnel (to complete the ring road round Antwerp, as provided for in the decision on the Trans-European Networks).
Ali je Komisija pooblaščena, da uradno potrdi skladnost osnutkov načrta z omenjeno direktivo?
Does the Commission have the powers to give formal confirmation that the preliminary draft plans are in conformity with the Tunnel Directive?
Kdaj namerava Komisija preučiti osnutke načrta za gradnjo predora in s tem v zvezi izraziti svoje stališče?
How much time does the Commission think will be needed in this case to assess the preliminary draft plans and deliver an opinion?
Ali morda službe Komisije same opravljajo inšpekcije na kraju samem, da bi preverile skladnost poročila o varnosti pristojne preiskovalne službe z direktivo EU iz leta 2004?
Do Commission departments themselves carry out on-site inspections to examine the safety report by the relevant inspection service in the light of the 2004 EU directive?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje načrte, da se v okviru vseevropskih cestnih omrežij (TERN) izkopa predor pod obratom Seveso, v tem primeru naftne družbe Total?
How does the Commission assess the plans to dig a TERN tunnel under a Seveso site, in this instance a Total petrochemical site?
Ali je to izvedljivo?
Is this feasible?
Ali obstajajo primeri takšnih predorov ali projektov predorov drugje v EU?
Are there examples of such tunnels or tunnel projects elsewhere in the EU?
Ali Komisija daje prednost, tako z vidika varnosti kot tudi z vidika varovanja okolja, gradnji mostu namesto predora, da bi uredila prometne razmere v vseevropskem cestnem omrežju?
From the safety and environmental point of view, is the Commission more in favour of the construction of a bridge or of a tunnel to deal with traffic congestion on the European TERN routes?
UL L 167, 30.4.2004, str.
OJ L 167, 30.4.2004, p.
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0174/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0174/10
Zadeva: Izzivanje Turčije in načrti Nata v zvezi z Egejskim morjem
Subject: Provocation from Turkey and NATO plans for the Aegean Sea
Turčija v Egejskem morju čedalje pogosteje izziva s prisotnostjo svojih bojnih letal in vojaškega ladjevja.
Turkey has intensified harassment manoeuvres using fighter planes and warships in the Aegean Sea.
To izzivanje je povezano z nenehnimi prizadevanji Turčije in imperialističnimi načrti Nata, da bi Egejsko morje razdelili na dva dela in s tem ustvarili „sivo območje“ vzhodno od 25. poldnevnika, omejili suverene pravice Grčije v zračnem in morskem prostoru tega morja ter v grških mestih in na otokih.
This provocation stems from ongoing efforts by Turkey and an imperialistic desire on NATO’s part to split the Aegean in two by creating a ‘grey zone’ to the east of the 25th meridian, thereby undermining Greece’s sovereign rights over the airspace and waters of the Aegean and its own towns and islands.
Turško vojno ladjevje in kopenski radarji motijo letala in helikopterje obalne policije in civilnega letalstva, ki opravljajo lete znotraj grškega zračnega prostora.
Turkish fighter planes and ground-based radar systems are harassing harbour-police planes and helicopters and civil aviation within Greek airspace.
Ladje turške vojne mornarice se približujejo grškim obalam, kot se je zgodilo 24. marca 2010, ko je turška korveta Bafra nezakonito vstopila v grške teritorialne vode, s čimer je povzročila izjemno nevarnost v celotni regiji.
Turkish navy ships are sailing in proximity to the Greek coast, as was the case on 24 March 2010 when the Turkish corvette Bafra entered Greek territorial waters, creating a situation of extreme danger which compromised the security of the entire region.
Ali Svet obsoja izzivanja, ki so uperjena v suverene pravice Grčije, ter načrte Nata za razdelitev Egejskega morja na dva dela, s katerimi močno ogroža varnost in mir v celotnem jugovzhodnem Sredozemlju?
Is the Council ready to condemn this intimidation, threatening as it does Greece’s sovereign rights, and NATO's plans to split the Aegean in two, which represent a very serious threat to peace and security in the entire south-west Mediterranean region?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0175/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0175/10
Zadeva: Dostop do gradiv v digitalni obliki v EU
Subject: Access to digital material in the EU
Državljani EU še vedno nimajo enakega dostopa do gradiv v digitalni obliki.
EU citizens still do not have equal access to material in digital form.
Tako na primer potrošniki iz Poljske še vedno ne morejo kupiti glasbenih posnetkov preko spletne trgovine iTunes.
For example, Polish Internet users are unable to purchase musical works through the iTunes Internet store.
Neenak dostop se pojavlja tudi pri drugih kupcih in proizvodih.
The problem of unequal access also affects other sellers and products.
Katere ukrepe bo sprejela Komisija na tem področju, da bi dosegla spremembo takšnih razmer?
What measures is the Commission going to take in order to change this situation?
Kako hitro se bodo pokazali učinki ukrepov?
When will the effect of these measures be felt?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0176/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0176/10
Zadeva: Množična grozodejstva v Nigeriji
Subject: Mass atrocities in Nigeria
Ali je Svet seznanjen z množičnimi grozodejstvi v nigerijski zvezni državi Plateau – zadnja so se zgodila 19. januarja 2010 in 7. marca 2010?
Is the Council aware of the most recent mass atrocities having taken place in Plateau State, Nigeria, on 19 January 2010 and 7 March 2010?
Ali je Svet seznanjen z dejstvom, da ne gre za osamljene primere, temveč je to del neprekinjenega kroga nasilja med različnimi etničnimi in verskimi skupinami v osrednji Nigeriji?
Is it aware that these mass atrocities are no isolated incidents, but rather part of a continuous cycle of violence between different ethnic and religious groups in central Nigeria?
Ali je Svet seznanjen s poročili, da so lokalni organi včasih vpleteni v nasilje, mnogokrat pa zgolj pasivno spremljajo dogajanje?
Is it aware of reports that local authorities have sometimes been involved in the violence, and often act only as passive bystanders?
Ali bo Svet pozval nigerijsko vlado in njene osrednje organe, naj si intenzivneje prizadevajo za prekinitev kroga nasilja med etničnimi in verskimi skupinami v osrednji Nigeriji, in sicer naj poskrbijo za boljšo varnost ogroženih skupnosti, vključno s tistimi na podeželju, naj privedejo storilce množičnih grozodejstev pred sodišče in naj začnejo reševati temeljne vzroke za sektaško nasilje, vključno s socialno, gospodarsko in politično diskriminacijo nekaterih skupin prebivalstva?
Will it urge the Nigerian Government and public authorities to do more to stop the cycle of violence between ethnic and religious groups in central Nigeria by: stepping up security for communities at risk, including those in rural areas; bringing the perpetrators of mass atrocities to justice; and addressing the root causes of sectarian violence, including social, economic and political discrimination against certain segments of the population?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0177/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0177/10
Ali je Komisija seznanjena z množičnimi grozodejstvi v nigerijski zvezni državi Plateau – zadnja so se zgodila 19. januarja 2010 in 7. marca 2010?
Is the Commission aware of the most recent mass atrocities having taken place in Plateau State, Nigeria, on 19 January 2010 and 7 March 2010?
Ali je Komisija seznanjena z dejstvom, da ne gre za osamljene primere, temveč je to del neprekinjenega kroga nasilja med različnimi etničnimi in verskimi skupinami v osrednji Nigeriji?
Is it aware that these mass atrocities are no isolated incidents, but rather part of a continuous cycle of violence between different ethnic and religious groups in central Nigeria?