natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Med izmenjavo mnenj v Odboru za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane z ministrico Joke Schauvliege, ki je bilo 14. julija 2010, je ta v imenu belgijskega predsedstva izrazila zadovoljstvo z resolucijo, ki jo je sprejel Parlament, in pripravljenost za nadaljnje korake v zvezi s tem vprašanjem.
During the subsequent exchange of views between the Committee on the Environment and the Belgian minister Joke Schauvliege held on 14 July 2010, the latter, speaking on behalf of the Belgian presidency, welcomed the resolution adopted by Parliament and promised further action on the matter.
Ali lahko Svet glede na to, da je belgijsko predsedovanje že na polovici, navede, kaj namerava storiti do konca svojega mandata za uresničitev tega, k čemur poziva Parlament?
Now that we are halfway through the Belgian presidency, can the Council state what action it ends to take before the end of the presidency with a view to implementing the measure called for by Parliament?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0471/2010
Question for Question Time H-0471/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Možnost ponovnega pojava recesije: vzdržljivost cilja 3-odstotnega primanjkljaja
(PPE) Subject: The possibility of a double-dip recession: sustainability of the 3% target
Ali lahko Svet odgovori na komentar uglednega nobelovca za ekonomijo Josepha Stiglitza, da je evropsko gospodarstvo v nevarnosti, da bo spet padlo v recesijo zaradi omejevanja odhodkov, ki so ga uvedle vlade držav EU, da bi dosegle 3-odstotno mejo primanjkljaja iz Pakta za stabilnost in rast?
Can the Council respond to comments by the respected Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz that the European economy risks sliding back into recession due to spending cuts imposed by EU governments in an attempt to reach the 3% deficit limit laid down in the Stability and Growth Pact?
Ali je 3-odstotni cilj realističen glede na sedanjo veliko obremenitev javnih financ v nekaterih državah članicah?
Is this 3% target a realistic one, considering that some Member State finances are under severe strain at present?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0472/2010
Question for Question Time H-0472/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Spremembe direktive EU o prostem gibanju in preprečevanje navideznih zakonskih zvez
(PPE) Subject: Changes to EU freedom of movement directive and prevention of sham marriages
Zaradi sodbe Evropskega sodišča v zadevi Metock z dne 25. julija 2008 so nekatere države članice – tudi Irska – morale opustiti zahteve po spremembi Direktive 2004/38/ES o prostem gibanju oseb v Evropski uniji, da bi preprečile priseljencem dogovarjanje o navideznih sklenitvah zakonske zveze, da bi lahko ostali v EU.
As a consequence of the European Court of Justice ruling in the Metock judgment of 25 July 2008, some Member States – including Ireland – have had to drop their demands for a change in Directive 2004/38/EC on the free movement of people within the European Union to prevent immigrants arranging marriages of convenience in order to stay in the EU.
Eden od pomembnejših irskih matičarjev je nedavno opozoril, da bi utegnilo biti 10–15 % sklenitev civilne zakonske zveze na Irskem navideznih, kar pomeni, da so namenjene izključno izogibanju pravilom o priseljevanju.
One of Ireland’s main marriage registrars warned recently that 10-15% of the civil ceremonies conducted across Ireland may be sham marriages aimed purely at circumventing immigration rules.
Ali je tudi Komisija, tako kot države članice, zaskrbljena zaradi morebitnega izkoriščanja te direktive glede na sodbo Metock?
Does the Commission share Member States’ concerns about the potential for exploitation of the directive in light of the Metock ruling?
Ali je Komisija prejela kakšne informacije od držav članic o zlorabi in kršitvah Direktive 2004/38/ES in, če jih je, katere mehanizme je vzpostavila, da bi te informacije delila z drugimi državami članicami?
Has the Commission received information from any Member State about abuse and violation of Directive 2004/38/EC and, if so, what mechanisms are in place for sharing such information with other Member States?
Ali Komisija meni, da lahko države članice zatrejo navidezne sklenitve zakonske zveze brez sprememb Direktive 2004/38/ES, in če lahko, natanko kako lahko to storijo?
Does the Commission believe that Member States can stamp out marriages of convenience without changes to Directive 2004/38/EC and, if so, exactly how?
UL L 158, 30.04.2004, str.
OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p.
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0473/2010
Question for Question Time H-0473/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Ukrepi, ki jih je predvidel Svet, da bi olajšal prost pretok delavcev med državami članicami
(S&D) Subject: Council measures in favour of free movement of labour between Member States
V novi gospodarski strategiji Evropske unije za prihodnjih deset let je mobilnost delavcev navedena kot osnovni pogoj za zmanjšanje brezposelnosti.
The EU's new plan for the economy for the next ten years refers to workforce mobility as an essential condition for reducing unemployment.
Delež brezposelnih se je v obdobju krize zaskrbljujoče povečal, in sicer s 6,8 % v maju 2008 na 10 % v juliju 2010.
The unemployment rate has risen disturbingly with the crisis, from 6.8% in May 2008 to 10% in July 2010.
Po raziskavi, ki jo je opravila Komisija in je bila objavljena 13. julija 2010, 48 % Evropejcev tudi pravi, da bi raje iskali delo v drugi državi ali regiji, kot da bi ostali brezposelni.
Meanwhile, according to a Commission survey published on 13 July 2010, 48% of Europeans would be willing to seek employment outside their country or region, rather than remain jobless.
Poleg tega jih 17 % namerava v prihodnosti delati v tujini.
In addition, 17% said they expected to work abroad at some time in the future.
Opozoriti je treba tudi na nujnost, da države članice namenijo prednost državljanom držav članic Unije pred delavci iz tretjih držav.
It should also be remembered that Member States are obliged to give preference to nationals of other Member States over third-country workers.
Ali bi glede na povedano Svet lahko navedel, katere konkretne ukrepe predvideva za hitro odpravo ovir, ki še preprečujejo prost pretok delavcev iz držav članic, ki so k Evropski uniji pristopile po 1. maju 2004?
In the light of the above, can the Council state what concrete measures it proposes with a view to the rapid elimination of the barriers now existing to the free movement of workers from those Member States which joined the Union after 1 May 2004?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0474/2010
Question for Question Time H-0474/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Zelena javna naročila
(PPE) Subject: Green public procurement
Med desetimi prednostnimi sektorji, ki jih je Komisija določila za zelena javna naročila, ni medicinskih pripomočkov.
Medical equipment does not feature as one of the ten priority sectors identified by the Commission for green public procurement.
Izdelava usklajenih meril za ta sektor se je izkazala za težavno, saj skupni izraz „medicinski pripomočki“ zajema veliko različnih vrst proizvodov.
The development of harmonised criteria for this sector has proven to be problematic because the generic term ‘medical equipment’ covers many different types of products.
Posledica pomanjkljivih smernic za naročanje medicinskih pripomočkov je lahko prikrajšanje tega sektorja za pomembne spodbude za nadaljnji razvoj boljših in trajnejših proizvodov.
The absence of guidelines on the procurement of medical equipment can, however, have the unintended consequence of depriving the sector of a key incentive to keep developing better and more sustainable products.
Ali je Komisija premislila o tem, da bi se ponovno lotila priprave smernic, tako da bi različne vrste proizvodov, ki jih zajema izraz „medicinski pripomočki“, razdelila v več kategorij?
Has the Commission considered making fresh efforts to draft guidelines with a view to creating more specific categories for the different types of products covered by the generic term ‘medical equipment’?
Ali je bil opravljen premislek o sodelovanju z gospodarstvom in panožnimi združenji, tako da bi ta sektor dejavnosti vključili v kategorizacijo različnih proizvodov?
In this context, has consideration been given to working together with the industry and professional associations so that the sector is involved in the categorisation of the different types of products?
Ali je Komisija poleg tega razmislila o določitvi posebnih kategorij inovacij, ki bi v prvi vrsti upoštevale značaj in področje uporabe proizvodov?
Has the Commission given thought also to determining specific categories of innovation that focus on the nature of the product and its applications?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0475/2010
Question for Question Time H-0475/2010
(ECR) Zadeva: Strukturne pomanjkljivosti skupne ribiške politike
(ECR) Subject: Structural failings of the current Common Fisheries Policy
Ena od strukturnih pomanjkljivosti zdajšnje skupne ribiške politike, ugotovljena v nedavni zeleni knjigi, je nezadostno upoštevanje veljavnih pravil.
One of the structural failings of the current Common Fisheries Policy identified in the recent green paper is a lack of compliance with existing rules.
Te razmere prispevajo k prelovu in k škodi v morskemu okolju, pogosto pa jih dodatno poslabšujejo spremembe, podprte s sredstvi EU.
This contributes to heavy overfishing and damage to the marine environment and is often exacerbated by developments that are supported by EU funds.
Zato sprašujem Komisijo, ali razmišlja o uvedbi mehanizma, pri katerem je pomoč pogojena in za dostop do sredstev EU in ribolovnih virov veljajo pogoji, podobno kot pri mehanizmu skupne kmetijske politike o navzkrižni skladnosti?
Therefore, is the Commission considering the introduction of a conditionality mechanism – making access to EU funds and fisheries resources subject to conditions – akin to the Common Agricultural Policy cross-compliance mechanism?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0476/2010
Question for Question Time H-0476/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Skupna kmetijska politika in navzkrižna skladnost
(S&D) Subject: Common Agricultural Policy and cross-compliance
Navzkrižna skladnost je pomemben sestavni del skupne kmetijske politike, ki večino plačil skupne kmetijske politike povezuje z upoštevanjem nekaterih pravil na področju okolja, zdravja in dobrega počutja živali.
Cross-compliance is an important element of the Common Agricultural Policy that links most CAP payments to the observance of certain rules in the areas of environment, health and animal welfare.
V posebnem poročilu Računskega sodišča št. 8/2008 je med drugim navedeno, da „države članice niso prevzele svoje odgovornosti za izvajanje uspešnih sistemov kontrole in sankcij.
Court of Auditors special report no 8/2008 includes the finding that ‘Member States did not take their responsibility to implement effective control and sanction systems.
Ali lahko Komisija Parlamentu razloži, kaj počne, da bi države članice spodbudila k učinkovitejšemu izvajanju in izvrševanju navzkrižne skladnosti?
Can the Commission tell Parliament what it is doing to encourage Member States to implement and enforce cross-compliance more effectively?
Ali je mogoče opaziti kakšen napredek?
Are any improvements noticeable?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0477/2010
Question for Question Time H-0477/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Enakost med spoloma in pokojnine žensk
(S&D) Subject: Gender equality and women's pensions
Poleti je Komisija izdala zeleno knjigo z naslovom „Ustrezni, vzdržni in varni pokojninski sistemi v Evropi“, v kateri obravnava številna vprašanja v zvezi z režimom solventnosti pokojninskih skladov, zviševanjem upokojitvene starosti in mobilnostjo upokojencev.
This summer, the Commission published a Green Paper entitled ‘Towards adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems’ in which it raises a number of issues relating to the solvency regime for pension funds, raising the retirement age and the mobility of pensions.
Vendar v knjigi ne omenja načela enakosti med spoloma niti višine pokojnin za ženske.
It does not, however, mention the principle of gender equality and totally ignores the issue of the level of women's pensions.
Ženske so vse življenje predmet diskriminacije na trgu dela, saj še vedno obstajajo velike razlike med plačami, ki jih prejemajo moški in ženske za enako delo.
Throughout their lives, women are subject to discrimination on the labour market because substantial differences still exist between the pay for men and women doing equivalent work.
Poleg tega prejemajo ženske nižje pokojnine, ker so zaposlene v panogah, v katerih so plače nižje, ali ker prekinejo zaposlitev, da skrbijo za družino, kar povečuje revščino starejših žensk.
Women's pensions are also lower because they work in low-pay sectors or because they have to stop working to look after their families, thus further increasing the poverty of women pensioners.
Ali Komisija ne meni, da bi morala posebej obravnavati vprašanje višine pokojnin za ženske, saj diskriminacija na trgu dela vpliva na raven njihovih pokojnin?
Does the Commission agree that the level of women's pensions should be dealt with as a separate issue, since discrimination on the labour market has an impact on retirement benefits for women?
Katere konkretne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti za zmanjšanje razlik v višini pokojnin za moške in za ženske?
What specific measures does the Commission intend to adopt in order to reduce the gap between the levels of pensions for women and men?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0478/2010
Question for Question Time H-0478/2010
(NI) Zadeva: Predsednik Malija
(NI) Subject: President of Mali
Zanima me, kako se Komisija odziva na govor predsednika Malija, ki ga je ta imel v Evropskem parlamentu prejšnji teden.
I should like to know the reaction of the Commission to the speech given by the President of Mali to the European Parliament last week.
Naj spomnim, da se je pritožil nad begom možganov iz Malija v razvite države.
It will be recalled that he complained that Mali was suffering a brain drain to the developed world.
Povedal je, da je skoraj 35% malijskih diplomantov zaposlenih v tujini in da je v drugih državah zaposlen tudi velik, sicer ne natančno znan, delež zdravstvenih delavcev.
He said that nearly 35% of Mali's graduates were working abroad and that a high but unspecified proportion of health service workers were working in other countries.
Ali Komisija meni, da je moralno sprejemljivo za razvite države, da državam tretjega sveta speljujejo zdravstveno osebje, ki so ga te izšolale na lastne stroške z zelo omejenimi sredstvi?
Does the Commission believe that it is morally acceptable for developed countries to poach the medical personnel of Third World countries, who have been trained at their expense from very limited resources?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0479/2010
Question for Question Time H-0479/2010
(ECR) Zadeva: Rusija ni predala razbitine poljskega letala TU-154
(ECR) Subject: Russia's failure to hand over the wreckage of the Polish TU-154
Kljub pritiskom poljske javnosti in kljub dejstvu, da je od letalske nesreče pri Smolensku, v kateri je bilo udeleženo poljsko letalo, ki je prevažalo poljskega predsednika, minilo že šest mesecev, Rusija niti ni vrnila razbitine letala TU-154 poljskim oblastem, niti jih ni zavarovala, kljub večkratnim zagotovilom o tem.
Despite pressure from Polish public opinion and despite the fact that it is now six months since the air disaster near Smolensk involving a Polish plane carrying the Polish President, not only has Russia not returned to the Polish authorities the wreckage of the TU-154 involved, it has not even secured it, despite repeated assurances on the matter.
Razbitina letala je ključni dokaz v tekoči, a počasni preiskavi nesreče.
The wreckage of the plane is the key evidence in the ongoing, but slow, investigation into this disaster.
Ali ima Komisija namen posredovati v tej zadevi, ki je zelo prizadela več milijonov Poljakov, tako da bo izvajala ustrezen pritisk na Rusijo?
Does the Commission intend to intervene in this matter, which is greatly upsetting for millions of Poles, in order to exert appropriate pressure on Russia?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0480/2010
Question for Question Time H-0480/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Uradno stališče Sveta EU o izgonu Romov iz Francije
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Official position of the EU Council regarding the expulsion of Roma from France
Evropski parlament se je nemudoma odzval na odločitev Francije, da s svojega ozemlja izžene Rome, ki so državljani EU (Romunije in Bolgarije), z resolucijo z dne 9. septembra 2010 ( P7_TA-PROV(2010)0312 ), v kateri je izrazil „globoko zaskrbljenost zaradi ukrepov ... omogočajo njihov izgon“ in zato „poziva (francoske) oblasti, naj nemudoma prekinejo vse izgone Romov, obenem pa poziva Komisijo, Svet in države članice, naj posredujejo z enako zahtevo“.
The decision by France to expel from its territory Roma EU citizens from Romania and Bulgaria has prompted an immediate response by the European Parliament which, in its resolution ( P7_TA-PROV(2010)0312 ) of 9 September 2010, ‘expresses its deep concern at the measures ... providing for their expulsion’ and accordingly urges (the French) authorities immediately to suspend all expulsions of Roma, at the same time calling on the Commission, the Council and the Member States to intervene with the same request’.
Komisarka za pravosodje, temeljne pravice in državljanstvo Viviane Reding je v imenu Komisije podala izjavo, v kateri so tudi naslednje ugotovitve: „Za diskriminacijo na podlagi etničnega porekla ali rase v Evropi ni prostora.
Speaking on behalf of the Commission, Viviane Reding, Commissioner for Justice, issued a statement which included the following observations: ‘Discrimination on the basis of ethnic origin or race has no place in Europe.
Nezdružljiva je z vrednotami, na katerih temelji Evropska unija.
It is incompatible with the values on which the European Union is founded.
Kakšno mnenje zastopa Svet pri tem vprašanju?
What view does the Council take of this particular issue?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0481/2010
Question for Question Time H-0481/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Ukrepi za preprečevanje erozije tal v skupni kmetijski politiki po letu 2013
(PPE) Subject: Measures to prevent soil erosion under the CAP post-2013
V osrednji, vzhodni in južni Evrope je čedalje več nesreč posledica hidrogeološke degradacije.
An increasing number of disasters are occurring in central, eastern and southern Europe owing to hydrogeological disturbances.
V resoluciji z dne 5. maja 2010 o kmetijstvu EU in podnebnih spremembah (2009/2157 (INI)) je Evropski parlament poudaril pomen prihodnje reforme skupne kmetijske politike in zaščite tal (ob ohranjanju njihovih organskih snovi) pred vodno in vetrno erozijo.
In its resolution of 5 May 2010 on agriculture in the Union and climate change (2009/2157 (INI)), Parliament stressed that the 'next reform of the CAP' should include 'protecting the soil from water and wind erosion by ensuring organic matter content'.
Katere ukrepe namerava v novi skupni kmetijski politiki sprejeti Komisija, da bi spodbudila posege za preprečevanje erozije tal?
Can the Commission state what measures it intends to take in the context of the new CAP to promote initiatives aimed at preventing soil erosion?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0482/2010
Question for Question Time H-0482/2010
(PPE) Zadeva: Pravila Basel III in evropske banke
(PPE) Subject: Basel III criteria and European banks
Baselski odbor je 12. septembra 2010 napovedal nova pravila za krepitev stabilnosti finančnega sistema .
On 12 September 2010, the Basel Committee announced that new criteria had been drawn up to strengthen the stability of the financial system .
Pravila predvidevajo zlasti povečanje deleža navadnih delnic/tveganju prilagojene aktive.
These criteria provide, inter alia, for an increase in the percentage of common equity in relation to risk-weighted assets.
Ali lahko Komisija odgovori na naslednja vprašanja: Ali meni, da je Basel III potreben zaradi nedavne finančne krize ali dopolnjuje strukturne pomanjkljivosti, ki jih Baslu II ni uspelo odpraviti?
Does the Commission consider that the need for Basel III is a result of the recent financial crisis or will the accord offset the structural weaknesses which Basel II was unable to rectify?
Kakšne posledice bo imel Basel III za zagotavljanje likvidnosti na trgu s strani evropskih bank?
What impact will Basel III have on the provision of liquidity by European banks to the market?
Ali meni, da bodo posledica Basla III hitrejše združitve bank?
Does the Commission consider that Basel III will accelerate mergers between banks?
Ali ocenjuje, da bodo zaradi novosti majhne banke v še slabšem položaju v primerjavi z velikimi bančnimi skupinami?
Does it consider that the new conditions will place smaller banks in an even more disadvantageous position in relation to the big banking groups?
Ali je predvideno širše posvetovanje o pravilih v okviru G20, s katerim bi se vzpostavili temelji za pravičnejšo konkurenco v finančnem sektorju na svetovnem trgu?
Should these criteria be the subject of broader consultation during the G20 summit with a view to establishing fair competition for financial activities on the world market?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0483/2010
Question for Question Time H-0483/2010
(GUE/NGL) Zadeva: Jamstveni sklad za grške kmete in ribiče
(GUE/NGL) Subject: Assistance for Greek farmers and fishermen from the guarantee fund for small and very small businesses
Katere pogoje bodo morali izpolniti morebitni prejemniki sredstev iz tega programa? b) Če Komisija ni bila obveščena, ali meni, da bi se lahko ta ukrep koristno vključil v nacionalni strateški referenčni okvir?
How much funding is being provided and what conditions must be met by beneficiaries?(b) If not, does the Commission consider it desirable to incorporate such an initiative in the NSRF?
Ali namerava grško vlado opozoriti na to možnost?
Will it suggest this to the Greek Government?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0484/2010
Question for Question Time H-0484/2010
(S&D) Zadeva: Vrhunsko srečanje EU-Afrika / Zanesljiva preskrba s hrano
(S&D) Subject: EU-Africa summit/food security
Svetovni dan hrane se slavi 16. oktobra.
In connection with World Food Day on 16 October 2009, the FAO has recently indicated that the situation remains unsatisfactory despite a slight improvement regarding the number of those suffering from chronic hunger in the world (925 million this year, compared with 1023 billion in 2009).
Nedavno je Organizacija Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo opozorila, da so razmere kljub rahlemu upadu števila oseb na svetu, ki trpijo kronično lakoto (925 milijonov v tem letu v primerjavi s 1.023 milijoni v letu 2009), še vedno nesprejemljive Nezanesljiva preskrba s hrano ogroža prvega razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, zlasti v podsaharski Afriki.
The lack of food security is threatening to undermine MDG objective 1, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.
Pred bližnjim vrhunskim srečanjem EU in Afrike (29. in 30. novembra v Tripoliju) mnogi akterji zahtevajo, da se pri strateškem partnerstvu bolj poudari zanesljiva preskrba s hrano, vključno z vidiki, povezanimi z dostopom do živil, infrastrukturo, lastništvom nad zemljo in prilagajanjem na podnebne spremembe.
In the run-up to the next EU-Africa summit (Tripoli, 29 and 30 November), many of those concerned are anxious that the strategic partnership should place greater emphasis on food security, including issues relating to access to food, infrastructures, land ownership and adjustment to climate change.
Ali Komisija meni, da je treba v skupno strategijo EU-Afrika vključiti novo partnerstvo za zanesljivo preskrbo s hrano?
Does the Commission consider it necessary to introduce a new specific partnership for food security under the joint Africa-EU Strategy?
Ali bodo okrepljena in usklajena horizontalna področja, ki so del obstoječih partnerstev in so potrebna za uresničitev zanesljive preskrbe s hrano v Afriki?
Does it intend to step up coordination on horizontal issues in the context of existing partnerships, this being necessary to achieve food security in Africa?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-0485/2010
Question for Question Time H-0485/2010