natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Z direktivo je določeno, da morajo države članice vzpostaviti in ustrezno izboljšati nacionalne okvire na področju jedrske varnosti.
It obliges Member States to establish and continuously improve national frameworks in the field of nuclear safety.
Direktiva krepi vlogo in neodvisnost nacionalnih regulativnih organov ter potrjuje, da primarno odgovornost za jedrsko varnost nosijo imetniki dovoljenja.
The text reinforces the role and independence of national regulatory authorities and confirms that licence holders have prime responsibility for nuclear safety.
Države članice morajo pri ukrepih urejanja spodbujati visoko stopnjo preglednosti in zagotavljati, da se redno izvajajo neodvisne ocene varnosti.
The Member States are obliged to encourage a high level of transparency in regulatory action and to ensure that independent safety assessments are regularly carried out.
Določila direktive morajo države članice prenesti do 22. julija 2011.
This text must be brought into force by the Member States by 22 July 2011.
Ali lahko Komisija sporoči, če je postopek uporabe direktive v teku?
Can the Commission say whether the process of implementing this Directive is under way?
Če je, ali Komisija lahko potrdi, da bodo vse države članice direktivo prenesle do 22. julija 2011?
If so, can the Commission confirm that the Directive will have been transposed in all the Member States by 22 July 2011?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000202/2011
Question for Question Time H-000202/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Prost in neoviran dostop invalidnih oseb na volišča, da bi izrazile svojo državljansko voljo
(S&D) Subject: Free and unfettered access for disabled people to elections to express their will as citizens
Madžarska, ki v tem šestmesečnem obdobju predseduje Svetu Evropske unije, je med najpomembnejše prednostne naloge v svojem programu uvrstila evropsko strategijo za invalidne osebe (2010–2020), ki je zlasti namenjena boju proti diskriminaciji invalidnih oseb in uresničevanju njihovih temeljnih in državljanskih pravic.
Hungary, whose turn it is to hold the EU Council presidency for the current six months, includes as one of the main priorities in its programme the European Disability Strategy (2010-2020), which notably aims to combat discrimination against disabled people and ensure that they are able to exercise their fundamental and civic rights.
Ali predsedujoča država ne meni, da bi morale države članice odpraviti ovire, ki invalidnim osebam preprečujejo prost in neoviran dostop na volišča, da bi izrazile svojo državljansko voljo in uresničevale svoje državljanske pravice?
As the country holding the presidency, does it not consider that there is a need in the Member States to remove the obstacles preventing disabled people from having free and unfettered access to elections, to express their will as citizens and exercise their civic rights?
Žal se lahko zaradi neprilagojenih struktur volitev udeleži le majhen odstotek invalidov.
Unfortunately because of an unsuitable physical environment only a small percentage of disabled people have the opportunity to turn out and vote.
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000203/2011
Question for Question Time H-000203/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Revizija Uredbe (EGS) št. 1612/68 o prostem gibanju delavcev v Skupnosti
(S&D) Subject: Review of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community
Referenčni okvir za prosto gibanje delavcev je postavljen z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 1612/68 o prostem gibanju delavcev v Skupnosti in je bil že večkrat spremenjen.
The reference framework for the free movement of workers is laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community and has been revised several times.
Evropski parlament trenutno pripravlja poročilo o spodbujanju poklicne mobilnosti v EU.
Parliament is currently drafting a report on promoting professional mobility in the EU.
Predstavnik Komisije, ki se je udeležil sestanka Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve je 19. aprila izjavil, da se Komisija pripravlja na revizijo uredbe, ki jo želi izboljšati.
The Commission representative who attended the meeting of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs stated on 19 April 2011 that the Commission was preparing to revise and improve the Regulation.
Kdaj naj bi po mnenju Komisije ta postopek stekel?
When in the Commission’s view is that process likely to begin?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000204/2011
Question for Question Time H-000204/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Varnost v cestnem prometu
(PPE) Subject: Road safety
To poletje bo veliko britanskih in irskih družin znova odpotovalo na počitnice v južno Evropo.
This summer will once again see many British and Irish families travel to southern Europe on their holidays.
Mnogi irski turisti bodo iz Corka ali Rosslareja odpluli v Roscoff in Cherbourg, številčni britanski turisti pa bodo potovali skozi tunel pod Rokavskim prelivom iz Dovra v Calais.
Many Irish tourists will take the boat from Cork or Rosslare to Roscoff and Cherbourg and many British tourists will take the Channel Tunnel from Dover to Calais.
Ti popotniki bodo preživeli nekaj tednov v Franciji, Nemčiji, Španiji in drugih državah članicah EU, kjer se vozi po desni strani cestišča.
These travellers will spend a couple of weeks in France, Germany, Spain and other EU countries that drive on the right-hand side of the road.
To je zaskrbljujoče, saj Irci in Britanci vozijo po levi strani in nimajo izkušenj z vožnjo po desni.
As the Irish and British drive on the left with no experience of driving on the right, there is cause for worry.
Zaradi neprimernosti vozil za vožnjo po levi strani je možnost nesreč pri vožnji po desni veliko večja.
Accidents are far more likely because of the impairments of driving a left-hand-drive car on the right-hand side of the road.
Ali je Svet pripravil strategijo za izboljšanje cestnoprometne varnosti voznikov, ki na ta način potujejo v tujino?
Has the Council a strategy to improve the safety of road users who travel abroad in this way?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000205/2011
Question for Question Time H-000205/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Preprečevanje uporabe spleta zločincem
(PPE) Subject: Countering the use of the internet by criminals
Zaradi hitre tehnološke rasti, še zlasti spletne, je vse težje prodreti v kriminalne organizacije.
The rapid growth of technology, and in particular the internet, is making criminal organisations more and more difficult to penetrate.
Zločinci se zdaj med seboj sporazumevajo preko spleta in ne več preko prenosnih telefonov, kar je bil njihov način do nedavnega.
Criminals are now communicating with one another via the internet, rather than by mobile phone, which had been the method of choice until recently.
Kako se namerava Komisija boriti proti zločinskim združbam po Evropi, ki uporabljajo splet?
How does the Commission propose to combat the use of the internet by criminal gangs across Europe?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000206/2011
Question for Question Time H-000206/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Sheme za kakovostno hrano
(PPE) Subject: Quality food schemes
Komisija je februarja 2011 registrirala 1000. ime kakovostne hrane.
In February 2011 the Commission registered its 1000th quality food name.
Jasno je, da se število vlog za registracijo geografske označbe, zaščitene označbe porekla in zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti kakovostne hrane med državami članicami močno razlikuje.
It is clear; however, that the number of applications to register under the protected geographical indication (PGI), protected designation of origin (PDO) and traditional specialities guaranteed (TSG) quality food schemes varies considerably from one Member State to another.
Kakšno je mnenje Komisije glede dejstva, da obstajajo takšne razlike med državami članicami?
Why does the Commission think there are such disparities between Member States?
Ali lahko komentira mnenja, ki so jih izrazili nekateri proizvajalci hrane, da je postopek registracije dolg in birokratiziran ter da to odvrača prosilce?
Can the Commission comment on the views expressed by some food producers that the registration process is long and bureaucratic and therefore discourages applicants?
Kako bi lahko proces registracije naredili uporabnikom prijaznejšega?
How can the registration process be made more user-friendly?
Ali Komisija lahko pripravi informacije o ozaveščenosti potrošnikov o shemah za kakovostno hrano?
Can the Commission provide information on consumer awareness of the quality food schemes?
Kako bi lahko priznavanje oznak geografske označbe, zaščitenega porekla in zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti izboljšali in približali potrošnikom, zlasti v državah članicah, ki imajo registriranih le malo tovrstnih proizvodov?
How can recognition of the PDO, PGI and TSG labels be improved and made more relevant to consumers, in particular in Member States that have few registered products?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000207/2011
Question for Question Time H-000207/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Varnost in smrtne nesreče pri delu
(ALDE) Subject: Workplace safety and fatalities at work
V 27 državah članicah EU vsako leto več tisoč delavcev umre za posledicami nesreč pri delu, približno 2,9 % pa jih je zaradi nesreče pri delu z dela odsotnih več kot tri dni.
In the EU-27 several thousand workers die in fatal accidents at work annually and approximately 2.9 % of workers have had an accident at work with more than 3 days of absence.
Ali lahko Komisija navede, kakšni ukrepi so na voljo za odpravo teh tragičnih razmer?
Can the Commission comment on what measures are in place to address this tragic situation?
Kako ocenjuje obstoječo strategijo 2007–2012?
What is the Commission’s assessment of the existing 2007 - 2012 strategy?
Ali je bil zabeležen napredek pri doseganju njenih ciljev in zmanjševanju tveganj nesreč pri delu s smrtnim izidom povsod v EU?
Has the strategy made progress towards achieving its aims and objectives and lowering the risk of fatalities at work across the EU?
Kakšno je trenutno stanje postopka posvetovanj o novi strategiji EU za varnost in zdravje pri delu za obdobje 2013–2020?
What is the current status of the consultation process on a new Health and Safety at Work Strategy for Europe for 2013 - 2020?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000208/2011
Question for Question Time H-000208/2011
(NI) Zadeva: Prerazporeditev sredstev regionalnega in kohezijskega sklada
(NI) Subject: Reallocation of financial resources in the regional and cohesion funds
Je Komisija pripravljena vsaj deset odstotkov zneska v višini 51 milijard EUR, ki se trenutno vsako leto dodeli regionalnemu in kohezijskemu skladu, prerazporediti za začetno financiranje novih električnih omrežij na področju obnovljivih virov energije?
Is the Commission prepared to reallocate at least 10% of the EUR 51 billion currently available each year in the regional and cohesion funds to fast-start funding for new electricity networks for renewable energy?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000210/2011
Question for Question Time H-000210/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Vpliv direktive o tradicionalnih zdravilih rastlinskega izvora na tovrstna zdravila v EU
(PPE) Subject: Impact of the Traditional Herbal Medicinal Products Directive on traditional herbal medicines in the EU
Dne 31. marca 2004 je bila sprejeta Direktiva 2004/24/ES o tradicionalnih zdravilih rastlinskega izvora.
Directive 2004/24/EC regarding traditional herbal medicinal products (THMPD) was adopted on 31 March 2004.
Kako Komisija ocenjuje izvajanje te direktive od 31. marca 2004?
How does the Commission evaluate the implementation of the THMPD as from 31 March 2004?
Kako ta direktiva vpliva na mala in srednja podjetja, ki proizvajajo tovrstna zdravila, in ali jim Komisija kako pomaga pri pridobivanju dovoljenj?
How does the Directive affect SMEs producing traditional herbal medicinal products and does the Commission in any way help such SMEs to achieve authorisation?
Kako bodo te zahteve vplivale na cene tovrstnih zdravil?
How will the said authorisation requirements affect prices of herbal medicinal products?
Ali direktiva omogoča uporabo teh zdravil, ki so učinkovita pri zdravljenju bolnikov z rakom in drugimi malignimi boleznimi (na primer z vbrizgavanjem)?
Does the Directive allow the use (i.e. via injections) of medications produced from herbs which are successfully used in treating patients with cancer and other malignant diseases?
Ali bo direktiva vplivala na proizvodnjo in uporabo homeopatskih zdravil?
Will this Directive affect the production and use of homeopathic medicine?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000211/2011
Question for Question Time H-000211/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Položaj evropskih pripravnikov
(S&D) Subject: Situation of trainees in Europe
Nedavna študija zveze nemških sindikatov (DGB) ponovno opozarja na neznosen položaj pripravnikov.
In the recent study by the German Trade Union Federation (DGB) the precarious situation of trainees is exposed again.
Podatki kažejo, da pripravništvo opravlja 28 % vseh univerzitetnih študentov in da je v 40 % primerov to pripravništvo neplačano.
28% of graduate students work in internships of which 40% are unpaid.
Takšne razmere vzbujajo skrb, saj družbam prehaja v navado, da redne delavce zamenjujejo z visoko usposobljenimi pripravniki, ne da bi jim za to izplačali ustrezne plače.
It is an urgent situation, because companies are establishing the habit of replacing regular workers by highly skilled interns without paying adequate wages.
S težavo se spopada celotna Evropa.
This is a problem all over Europe.
Ali Komisija poleg obsežne študije izvaja še kakšne kratkoročne ukrepe za preprečevanje izkoriščanja mladih delavcev v Evropi?
Apart from the current comprehensive study, is there anything the Commission is doing in the short term to stop the exploitation of young workers in Europe?
Ali lahko od držav članic zahteva, da zagotovijo večjo jasnost v svojih zakonskih določbah ter poenostavijo izmenjave pripravnikov, ki svoja pripravništva opravljajo v drugih državah članicah?
How can the Commission request that Member States create greater clarity in their legal provisions and simplify exchanges for trainees performing their training in other Member States?
Pobuda Mladi in mobilnost omenja „kakovosten okvir za pripravništva“.
The initiative ‘Youth on the move’ mentions a ‘quality framework for traineeships’.
Kdaj točno je mogoče pričakovati ta okvir?
When exactly can this framework be expected?
Ali se načrtujejo druge pobude, ki bi podpirale vključevanje mladih delavcev na trg dela?
Are other initiatives planned to support the integration of young workers into the labour market?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000212/2011
Question for Question Time H-000212/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Uresničevanje ciljev pri odhodkih iz strukturnih skladov
(ALDE) Subject: Fulfilment of the objectives of structural funds payments
Komisija bo konec junija 2011 predstavila predlog naslednjega sedemletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2014–2020.
At the end of June 2011, the Commission will present its proposal for the next 7-year budgetary framework (2014-2020).
V okviru regionalne politike EU je pri posameznih programih prihajalo do precejšnjih težav zaradi absorpcijske zmogljivosti.
In the case of EU regional policy, there have been substantial problems with absorption capacity under the individual programmes.
Več programov prav tako ni izpolnilo zadanih ciljev.
Several programmes have also failed to achieve their objectives.
Kako namerava Komisija v naslednjem proračunskem obdobju vključiti absorpcijsko zmogljivost posamezne države članice kot merilo za dodeljevanje sredstev iz strukturnih skladov?
How does the Commission intend to include the absorption capacity of each Member State as a criterion for the allocation of structural fund appropriations in the coming budgetary period?
Ali se Komisija strinja z zamislijo, da bi bilo treba ponovno preveriti odhodke, kadar je posamezna regija več let prejemala sredstva iz strukturnih skladov, na koncu pa ni izpolnila zastavljenih ciljev?
Does the Commission agree that payments should be reviewed if a region has been receiving structural funding for years without this resulting in it meeting the targets set?
Ali bo Komisija preverila mehanizem zastaranja, s katerim bi posamezni regiji prejemnici določili končni rok za dodelitev sredstev iz strukturnih skladov?
Will the Commission consider a ‘sunset mechanism’ that sets a closing date on the allocation of structural fund appropriations to individual recipient regions?
Ali Komisija prav tako meni, da bi tak mehanizem pripomogel k ustvarjanju kohezijske politike, ki bi bila bolj usmerjena k rezultatom?
Does the Commission agree that such a mechanism would help create a more results-oriented cohesion policy?
Računsko sodišče je v letnem poročilu za leto 2009 določilo najvišjo stopnjo napak za odhodke v okviru kohezijske politike EU.
The Court of Auditors Annual Report for 2009 found the highest error rate to be in payments under the EU’s cohesion policy.
Enako velja tudi za prejšnja leta.
This was the same finding as in previous years.
Kako namerava Komisija popraviti to stanje?
How does the Commission intend to remedy this situation?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000213/2011
Question for Question Time H-000213/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Kako Evropo približati njenim državljanom
(ALDE) Subject: Bringing Europe closer to its citizens
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000214/2011
Question for Question Time H-000214/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Združitev Evropskega sklada za globalizacijo in Evropskega socialnega sklada
(ALDE) Subject: Merging the EGF and ESF
Ali lahko Komisija glede na nekatere predloge za združitev Evropskega sklada za globalizacijo in Evropskega socialnega sklada opiše bistvene razlike med skladoma in predstavi svoje načrte v zvezi s tem predlogom?
In light of certain suggestions to merge the European Globalisation Fund with the European Social Fund, could the Commission outline the essential differences between the two funds and could it also elaborate on its perspective with regard to such a proposal?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000215/2011
Question for Question Time H-000215/2011
(ALDE) Zadeva: Ocenjevanje Schengena in možni mehanizmi za njegovo začasno odpravo
(ALDE) Subject: Schengen evaluations and the possible suspension mechanism
Obstaja nevarnost, da bodo predlogi Komisije za upravljanje schengenskega območja zbujali vtis, da dajejo prednost evropskim postopkom pred evropsko vsebino.
There is a danger that Commission proposals for governance of the Schengen zone are seen to be prioritising European procedure over European substance.
Komisija predlaga, da bi v prenovljenem schengenskem ocenjevalnem procesu igrala vodilno vlogo, Parlament pa predlaga, naj se to spremeni, da bi omogočili ravnotežje med evropskimi in nacionalnimi strokovnjaki.
The Commission is suggesting a dominant lead for itself in a revised Schengen evaluation process, and Parliament proposes to modify that in order to allow a balance between the role of European and national experts.
Kar zadeva začasno odpravo Schengena, Komisija namesto odločitev držav članic predlaga mehanizem EU, vendar je pri tem prišlo do splošnih (napačnih) razlag, da bo zato v praksi dejansko lažje ponovno uvesti notranje meje.
In relation to Schengen suspension, the Commission is proposing an EU mechanism instead of Member State decision, but this has been widely (mis)interpreted to mean that the reintroduction of internal borders will actually be easier in practice.
Ali ne bi bilo bolje dati prednost evropski vsebini in po potrebi proti državi članici, ki krši schengenska pravila, začeti postopek za ugotavljanje kršitve, saj se utegne izvedba metode Skupnosti za ocenjevanje in začasno odpravo kljub njeni koristnosti pokazati za politično prezahtevno?
Since it may well prove politically too difficult to implement a Community method for both evaluations and suspension, however worthwhile, would it not be better to make European substance the priority by launching infringement proceedings when necessary against Member States in breach of Schengen rules?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000216/2011
Question for Question Time H-000216/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Izvajanje schengenskega sporazuma
(S&D) Subject: Implementation of the Schengen Agreement
Vzpostavitev schengenskega prostora brez notranjih meja in prosto gibanje evropskih državljanov sta temeljni načeli EU in eden od stebrov evropske zgradbe.
Freedom of movement for European citizens unimpeded by internal borders following the creation of the Schengen Area is one of the basic principles of the EU and the cornerstone of European integration.
Če upoštevamo tudi izjavo predsednika Evropskega parlamenta, da je "svoboda gibanja najbrž vidik EU, ki ga Evropejci najbolj cenijo", ali Komisija lahko odgovori na naslednja vprašanja: kakšen pristop namerava zavzeti do Danske zaradi njene odločitve, da ponovno vzpostavi nadzor na mejah?
In view of this and the statement by the EP President to the effect that freedom of movement is perhaps the aspect of the EU most appreciated by Europeans, what position does the Commission intend to adopt with regard to Denmark following its recent decision to reintroduce border controls?
Ali namerava sprejeti drugačne ukrepe za povečanje nadzora na zunanjih mejah EU?
Is it willing to take measures further to strengthen external EU borders?
Ali namerava sprožiti revizijo načela o izključni pristojnosti države, kjer je bil ugotovljen prvi nezakonit vstop?
Will it review the principle that the Member State of entry bears sole responsibility for illegal immigrants?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000217/2011
Question for Question Time H-000217/2011
(PPE) Zadeva: Ustrezna uporaba strukturnih skladov v evropskih regijah
(PPE) Subject: Timely use of structural funds in European regions
Iz uradnih podatkov mnogih evropskih regij o razmerah na področju porabe sredstev iz skladov, kot je Evropski socialni sklad, Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj itd., je razvidno, da pogosto prihaja do zamud pri pravočasnem in učinkovitem doseganju ciljev porabe, opredeljenih v posameznih regionalnih operativnih načrtih.
Many European regions’ official data on the spending of funds from the ESF, the ERDF, etc., show that the spending targets laid down in Regional Operational Programmes are reached late and inefficiently.
Ali lahko Komisija ob upoštevanju teh zamud, ki so jih zabeležile ustrezne nadzorne službe posameznih držav članic, sporoči, česa se lahko naučimo iz preteklega finančnega načrtovanja in kako lahko to uporabimo v prihodnjem obdobju 2013-2020, da bi pospešili porabo in natančneje nadzorovali učinkovitost doseganja ciljev?
In the light of these delays recorded by the relevant monitoring authorities in the Member States, what lessons learnt in the last financial programming period could be applied to the 2013-2020 period in order to speed up spending and implement more precise controls on the fulfilment of objectives?
Vprašanje za čas za vprašanja H-000218/2011
Question for Question Time H-000218/2011
(S&D) Zadeva: Stanje pri opredeljevanju strateških projektov in finančnih sredstev v okviru strategije EU za Podonavje
(S&D) Subject: EU strategy for Danube region - stage reached in identifying strategic projects and financial resources
Evropska komisija je 8. decembra 2010 v skladu z zahtevo Evropskega sveta v sklepih z dne 18. in 19. junija 2009 ter Evropskega parlamenta v resoluciji z dne 20. januarja 2010 predložila strategijo EU za Podonavje.
In line with the requests made by the European Council, in its conclusions of 18 and 19 June 2009, and the European Parliament, in its resolution of 20 January 2010, on 8 December 2010 the Commission presented the EU's strategy for the Danube region.
Komisija je 3. februarja 2011 v Budimpešti predstavila imena krajev in regij, ki bodo odgovorni za usklajevanje prednostnih ukrepov strategije.
On 3 February 2011 in Budapest, the Commission named the localities and regions which will be responsible for coordinating the strategy's priority actions.