natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali Svet meni, da so predlagane spremembe italijanskega zakona o telefonskem prisluškovanju primerne in v skladu z evropskimi merili o svobodi obveščanja in tiska ter s pravico državljanov do obveščanja, ki jo zagotavlja člen 11 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah ter člen 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, ter s sorodno sodno prakso?
Does the Council think that the proposed changes to Italy’s wiretap law are proportionate and in line with European standards on freedom of information, media freedom and the citizen’s right to know, as guaranteed by Article 11 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and related case law?
Ali Svet meni, da so predlagane spremembe v skladu s cilji EU o boju proti kaznivim dejanjem in organiziranemu kriminalu v Evropi?
Does the Council think that the proposed changes are compatible with the EU objectives on combating crime and organised crime in Europe?
Ali Svet meni, da so predlagane spremembe (katerih izraženi namen je preprečevanje kršenja sodne tajnosti in varstvo zasebnosti) ustrezne, saj bi utegnile resno omejiti državne organe pregona pri njihovem delovanju za zaščito varnosti državljanov s preprečevanjem in zatiranjem kaznivih dejanj in organiziranega kriminala, utegnile pa bi tudi omejiti svobodo obveščanja?
Does the Council think that the proposed changes – the declared aims of which are to prevent violations of trial secrecy and to protect privacy – are proportionate to the practical effect they will have in severely limiting state law-enforcement activity directed at guaranteeing citizens’ security through the prevention and repression of crime and organised crime, and in restricting freedom of information?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Svet sprejeti za zagotavljanje svobode obveščanja, izražanja ter svobode tiska v Italiji in EU ter za učinkovit boj proti kaznivim dejanjem in organiziranemu kriminalu v Italiji in EU?
What steps will the Council take to ensure that freedom of information, freedom of expression and freedom of the press are guaranteed in Italy and in the EU and that the fight against crime and organised crime in Italy and the EU is effective?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000251/2011
Question for oral answer O-000251/2011
Ali Komisija meni, da so predlagane spremembe italijanskega zakona o telefonskem prisluškovanju primerne in v skladu z evropskimi merili o svobodi obveščanja in tiska ter s pravico državljanov do obveščanja, ki jo zagotavlja člen 11 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah ter člen 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, ter s sorodno sodno prakso?
Does the Commission think that the proposed changes to Italy’s wiretap law are proportionate and in line with European standards on freedom of information, media freedom and the citizen’s right to know, as guaranteed by Article 11 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and related case law?
Ali Komisija meni, da so predlagane spremembe v skladu s cilji EU o boju proti kaznivim dejanjem in organiziranemu kriminalu v Evropi?
Does the Commission think that the proposed changes are compatible with the EU objectives on combating crime and organised crime in Europe?
Ali Komisija meni, da so predlagane spremembe (katerih izraženi namen je preprečevanje kršenja sodne tajnosti in varstvo zasebnosti) ustrezne, saj bi utegnile resno omejiti državne organe pregona pri njihovem delovanju za zaščito varnosti državljanov s preprečevanjem in zatiranjem kaznivih dejanj in organiziranega kriminala, utegnile pa bi tudi omejiti svobodo obveščanja?
Does the Commission think that the proposed changes – the declared aims of which are to prevent violations of trial secrecy and to protect privacy – are proportionate to the practical effect they will have in severely limiting state law-enforcement activity directed at guaranteeing citizens’ security through the prevention and repression of crime and organised crime, and in restricting freedom of information?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti za zagotavljanje svobode obveščanja, izražanja ter svobode tiska v Italiji in EU ter za učinkovit boj proti kaznivim dejanjem in organiziranemu kriminalu v Italiji in EU?
What steps will the Commission take to ensure that freedom of information, freedom of expression and freedom of the press are guaranteed in Italy and in the EU and that the fight against crime and organised crime in Italy and the EU is effective?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000252/2011
Question for oral answer O-000252/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Priporni pogoji v EU
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Detention conditions in the EU
Komisija je na izrecno zahtevo Sveta, po večkratnem pozivu Parlamenta in v skladu s stockholmskim programom objavila zeleno knjigo z naslovom Krepitev medsebojnega zaupanja na evropskem pravosodnem območju – Zelena knjiga o izvajanju kazenskopravne zakonodaje EU na področju pripora.
The Commission has issued a Green Paper, further to an explicit request by the Council and as provided for by the Stockholm Programme and repeatedly called for by Parliament, on ‘Strengthening mutual trust in the European judicial area - A Green Paper on the application of EU criminal justice legislation in the field of detention’.
Ta zelena knjiga odpira široko razpravo interesnih skupin o ukrepih EU za izboljšanje pripornih pogojev, da bi zagotovili vzajemno zaupanje v pravosodnem sodelovanju.
The paper launches an open consultation exercise for stakeholders on EU actions for improvement of detention conditions so as to ensure mutual trust in judicial cooperation.
Hkrati osvetljuje povezave med pripornimi pogoji in različnimi instrumenti EU, kot sta evropski nalog za prijetje in evropski nalog za nadzor, ter pojasnjuje, da so med temami, o katerih bi EU lahko podala pobude, tudi pripor pred sojenjem, položaj otrok in priporni pogoji.
It also highlights the links between detention conditions and various EU instruments, such as the European Arrest Warrant and the European Supervision Order, and illustrates how pre-trial detention, the situation of children and detention conditions are issues on which the EU could take initiatives.
V prilogi k zeleni knjigi je opisano zelo različno in pogosto skrb zbujajoče stanje v državah članicah, zlasti kar zadeva število oseb v priporu pred sojenjem, stopnjo zasedenosti zaporov in njihovo prenapolnjenost, delež zapornikov ter delež zapornikov, ki niso državljani zadevne države.
The paper contains an annex illustrating the very varied and often worrying situation in Member States, notably in relation to the number of pre-trial detainees, prison occupancy level and overcrowding, the prison population rate, and the detention rate for non-nationals.
Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice je države članice EU večkrat obsodilo zaradi pripornih pogojev, dolžine pripora pred sojenjem ter delovanja njihovega pravosodja, med drugim na podlagi poročil Odbora za preprečevanje mučenja Sveta Evrope.
The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly condemned EU Member States with regard to detention conditions, the length of pre-trial detention and the administration of justice, including on the basis of reports by the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture.
S katerimi ukrepi na ravni EU namerava Svet zagotoviti spoštovanje temeljnih pravic oseb v priporu ter izboljšanje pripornih pogojev v državah članicah?
What will the Council do at EU level to ensure that fundamental rights of persons detained in prisons are respected and that detention conditions are improved in Member States?
Kaj bo storil glede zlorab pripora pred sojenjem, prenapolnjenosti in visoke stopnje zasedenosti zaporov ter deleža zapornikov, ki niso državljani zadevne države?
What will the Council do in relation to the abuse of pre-trial detention, overcrowding, high prison population rates and detention rates for non-nationals?
Ali bo preučil vpliv kazenskih politik in zakonodaj na področju pripornih pogojev ter v zvezi s temi vprašanji podal priporočila, na primer uporabo alternativnih ukrepov, kriminalizacijo nezakonitih priseljencev ter posebne ukrepe za zagotovitev spoštovanja temeljnih pravic?
Will it examine the impact of criminal policies and laws on detention conditions and make recommendations in relation to these issues, such as recourse to alternative measures, criminalisation of irregular immigrants, and special measures to ensure that fundamental rights are respected?
Kako se bo odzval na zeleno knjigo Komisije?
What will the Council do to follow up the Commission Green Paper?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000253/2011
Question for oral answer O-000253/2011
Ta zelena knjiga odpira široko razpravo interesnih skupin o ukrepih EU za izboljšanje pripornih pogojev, da bi zagotovili vzajemno zaupanje v pravosodnem sodelovanju.
The paper launches an open consultation exercise for stakeholders on EU actions for improvement of detention conditions to ensure mutual trust in judicial cooperation.
S katerimi ukrepi na ravni EU namerava Komisija zagotoviti spoštovanje temeljnih pravic oseb v priporu ter izboljšanje pripornih pogojev v državah članicah?
What will the Commission do at EU level to ensure that fundamental rights of persons detained in prisons are respected and that detention conditions are improved in Member States?
Kaj bo storila glede zlorab pripora pred sojenjem, prenapolnjenosti in visoke stopnje zasedenosti zaporov ter deleža zapornikov, ki niso državljani zadevne države?
What will the Commission do in relation to the abuse of pre-trial detention, overcrowding, high prison population rates and detention rates for non-nationals?
Ali bo preučila vpliv kazenskih politik in zakonodaj na področju pripornih pogojev ter v zvezi s temi vprašanji podala priporočila, na primer uporabo alternativnih ukrepov, kriminalizacijo nezakonitih priseljencev ter posebne ukrepe za zagotovitev spoštovanja temeljnih pravic?
Will it examine the impact of criminal policies and laws on detention conditions and make recommendations in relation to these issues, such as recourse to alternative measures, criminalisation of irregular immigrants, and special measures to ensure that fundamental rights are respected?
Kako bo ukrepala v skladu s svojo zeleno knjigo?
What will the Commission do to follow up its Green Paper?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000254/2011
Question for oral answer O-000254/2011
v imenu skupine Verts/ALE Zadeva: Patenti za rastline in živali iz konvencionalne pridelave
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Subject: Patents for plants and animals derived from conventional breeding
V zadevi G1/08 je Evropski patentni urad odločil, da je treba postopek pridelave obravnavati kot „v bistvu biološkega“ in ga zato ni mogoče patentirati zaradi člena 53b Evropske patentne konvencije in člena 4(b) Direktive št. 98/44/ES, ki izključujeta patentiranje „postopkov za vzgojo rastlin in živali, ki so v bistvu biološki.“
In G1/08, the EPO decided that the process for breeding had to be regarded as ‘essentially biological’ and therefore could not be patented because of Article 53b of the European Patent Convention (EPC) and Article 4(b) of EU Directive 98/44/EC, which exclude patents on ‘essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals’.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da je sedanja praksa Evropskega patentnega urada v nasprotju s smislom člena 4(b) Direktive št. 98/44/ES?
Does the Commission agree that the current practice of the EPO is in contradiction with the meaning of Article 4(b) of EU Directive 98/44/EC?
Če se Komisija strinja, katere ukrepe bo uvedla na tem področju, da bi Evropskemu patentnemu urada preprečila podeljevanje teh patentov na podlagi Direktive št. 98/44/ES?
In the event that the Commission agrees, what actions and measures will the Commission take in this regard to stop the EPO granting these patents on the basis of EU Directive 98/44/EC?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000255/2011
Question for oral answer O-000255/2011
v imenu Odbora za peticije Zadeva: Dostop slepih do knjig
on behalf of the Committee on Petitions Subject: Blind persons' access to books
Da bi se spoprijeli s problemom dostopa slepih in oseb, ki imajo težave z branjem, do knjig in drugih tiskanih gradiv, sta Svetovna in Evropska zveza slepih pri Svetovni organizaciji za intelektualno lastnino predlagali mednarodno zavezujočo pogodbo, s katero bi uveljavili namensko izjemo od avtorskih pravic.
In order to confront the problem of access for blind and print-disabled persons to books and other printed products, the World Blind Union and the European Blind Union have proposed an internationally binding treaty at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to establish a targeted exception to copyright.
Komisija in Svet pa v EU predlagata sporazume interesnih skupin in prostovoljno priporočilo pri Svetovni organizaciji za intelektualno lastnino.
The Commission and Council, on the other hand, are proposing stakeholder agreements in the EU and a voluntary recommendation at WIPO.
Po mnenju Evropske zveze slepih to ne zadostuje.
The European blind community deems both to be wholly insufficient.
EU podpira zavezujoče pogodbe Svetovne organizacije za intelektualno lastnino z vse druge namene, torej kako Svet upravičuje predlog z nižjim standardom za svetovno pravno zaščito invalidov?
While the EU supports binding WIPO treaties for all other purposes, how does the Council justify proposing a lower standard of global legal protection for disabled persons?
Ali Svet meni, da njegovo ravnanje v zvezi s pogodbo Svetovne organizacije za intelektualno lastnino docela spoštuje želje Evropskega parlamenta, izražene v njegovem poročilu Izkoriščanje potenciala kulturnih in ustvarjalnih industrij, v katerem je pozval k zavezujoči pogodbi pri tej organizaciji?
Does the Council consider that its actions with regard to the WIPO treaty respond fully to the wishes of the European Parliament as expressed in its report ‘Unlocking the potential of cultural and creative industries’, which calls for a legally binding treaty at WIPO?
Ali Svet meni, da je njegovo nasprotovanje taki pogodbi skladno z njegovo lastno strategijo za invalide 2010–2020, katere osrednji namen je odpraviti ovire za vključevanje in vzpostaviti kulturo enakih možnosti?
Does the Council consider its opposition to the WIPO treaty to be consistent with its own 2010-2020 strategy for disabled people that specifically aims to remove obstacles to inclusion and to create a culture of equal opportunities?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000256/2011
Question for oral answer O-000256/2011
EU podpira zavezujoče pogodbe Svetovne organizacije za intelektualno lastnino z vse druge namene, torej kako Komisija upravičuje predlog z nižjim standardom za svetovno pravno zaščito invalidov?
While the EU supports binding WIPO treaties for all other purposes, how does the Commission justify proposing a lower standard of global legal protection for disabled persons?
Ali Komisija meni, da njeno ravnanje v zvezi s pogodbo Svetovne organizacije za intelektualno lastnino docela spoštuje želje Evropskega parlamenta, izražene v njegovem poročilu Izkoriščanje potenciala kulturnih in ustvarjalnih industrij, v katerem je pozval k zavezujoči pogodbi pri tej organizaciji?
Does the Commission consider that its actions with regard to the WIPO treaty respond fully to the wishes of the European Parliament as expressed in its report ‘Unlocking the potential of cultural and creative industries’, which calls for a legally binding treaty at WIPO?
Ali Komisija meni, da je njeno nasprotovanje taki pogodbi skladno z njeno lastno strategijo za invalide 2010–2020, katere osrednji namen je odpraviti ovire za vključevanje in vzpostaviti kulturo enakih možnosti?
Does the Commission consider its opposition to the WIPO treaty to be consistent with its own 2010-2020 strategy for disabled people that specifically aims to remove obstacles to inclusion and to create a culture of equal opportunities?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000257/2011
Question for oral answer O-000257/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Piratstvo ob obali Somalije in Omana
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Piracy off the coast of Somalia and Oman
Napadi piratov se žal še zmeraj vrstijo.
Acts of piracy are, unfortunately, still being committed.
Ugrabljeni sta bili posadki plovil Savina Caylyn in Rosalia D'Amato, na katerih je bilo 11 Italijanov in 32 tujcev.
The crews of the vessels Savina Caylyn and Rosalia D’Amato, comprising 11 Italians and 32 foreigners, have been taken hostage.
Prvo ladjo so pirati zajeli 8. februarja 2011 ob obali Omana, drugo pa 21. aprila.
The first boat was captured on 8 February 2011 off the coast of Oman, and the second was captured on 21 April.
Italijanska vlada je obljubila, da bo spremljala zadevo in sprejela aktivne diplomatske pobude.
The Italian Government has promised to follow this issue and to actively undertake diplomatic initiatives.
Kot kaže, so pirati na začetku zahtevali odkupnino v znesku 20 milijonov ameriških dolarjev.
It seems that in the beginning, the pirates requested a ransom of USD 20 million.
Pozneje so jo znižali na 14 milijonov.
This was later reduced to USD 14 million.
Ko je podjetje, za katerega pluje Savina Caylyn, navsezadnje ponudilo 7,5 milijona USD, pirati niso sprejeli zneska, pogajanja pa so se prekinila.
When the company operating the Savina Caylyn subsequently offered USD 7.5 million the pirates did not accept it and talks broke down.
Sorodniki ugrabljenih mornarjev so avgusta 2011 zaprosili italijanskega predsednika za pomoč in v medijih objavili slike mornarjev, na katerih je bilo videti, da so bili ti pretepeni.
In August 2011 the relatives of the captured sailors appealed to the President of Italy and released pictures of the sailors, who had visibly been beaten, to the media.
Ker je to vprašanje tudi po osmih mesecih še zmeraj nerešeno in upoštevajoč stanje talcev:
Whereas this issue remains unresolved after eight months, and taking into account the conditions of the hostages:
S katerimi ukrepi lahko visoka predstavnica/podpredsednica pomaga osvoboditi posadki navedenih ladij?
What measures can the High Representative/Vice President take to help free the crews of these two vessels?
Koliko ladij, ki so plule pod zastavo EU, je bilo zajetih in kako dolgo so bile zadržane?
How many ships flying EU flags have been captured, and for how long were they held?
Koliko ladij je bilo napadenih?
In addition, how many ships have been attacked?
Kako se namerava Komisija glede na novo zunanjepolitično vlogo EU spoprijeti s težavo piratstva, vključno s pobudo na ravni EU, da bi zagotovili ustrezno mednarodno pravno podlago za učinkovit pregon piratov?
In view of the new EU foreign policy role, how does the Commission intend to tackle the problem of piracy, including an initiative at the EU level, to provide an appropriate international legal basis for the effective prosecution of pirates?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000258/2011
Question for oral answer O-000258/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Športni ribolov in reforma SRP
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Recreational fishing and the CFP reform
Upadanje ribiškega sektorja je zelo prizadelo obalne skupnosti.
Coastal communities have been hit hard by the decline in the fisheries sector.
Ribiške skupnosti so se na spremembe odzvale s širitvijo dejavnosti na področja, kot je „pescaturismo“ (športni ribolov), ki spodbuja turizem in ustvarja ali ohranja delovna mesta.
In response , fishing communities have diversified into areas such as ‘pescaturismo’ (recreational fishing),which promotes tourism and creates or safeguards jobs.
Vse vrste športnega ribolova sicer niso trajnostne, nekatere pa so.
While not all forms of recreational fishing are sustainable, some are.
Ali Komisija meni, da je takšna širitev dejavnosti skladna s cilji strategije Evropa 2020 in srečanja Rio+20?
Does the Commission believe that such diversification is in line with the Europe 2020 strategy and the Rio+20 objectives?
Ali je mogoče takšne športne ribolovne dejavnosti vključiti v predloge za reformo SRP, ki jih je Komisija podala 13. julija 2011?
Can such recreational fishing activities be integrated into the CFP reform proposals presented by the Commissioner on 13 July 2011?
Ali bi Komisija podprla financiranje dejavnosti, kot je športni ribolov, in drugih vodnih dejavnosti iz Evropskega sklada za ribištvo in/ali Kohezijskega sklada?
Would the Commission support funding for activities such as recreational fishing and water-related activities under the European Fisheries Fund and/or the Cohesion Fund?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000259/2011
Question for oral answer O-000259/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Položaj Romov v državah članicah
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: The situation of the Roma in Member States
V okviru EU za nacionalne strategije vključevanja Romov je določen skupni niz načel in ciljev, ki jih je treba uresničiti na nacionalni in evropski ravni.
The EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies establishes a common set of principles and targets to be met both at national and European level.
V okviru, ki ga je Komisija predložila aprila 2011, Svet pa ga je v svojih sklepih maja potrdil, se države članice poziva, naj svoje nacionalne romske strategije prilagodijo ciljem tega okvira.
The framework, presented by the Commission in April 2011 and welcomed in the Council Conclusions in May, calls on Member States to align their national Roma strategies to its objectives.
Države članice morajo svoje strategije posodobiti in jih do konca decembra 2011 predložiti Komisiji.
Member States are to update and present them to the Commission by the end of December 2011.
Splošni cilj teh strategij je, da se do leta 2020 odpravi izključevanje Romov.
The general goal of these strategies is to put an end to the exclusion of Roma by 2020.
V nekaterih državah članicah politik vključevanja ne izvajajo, nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi pa celo sprejemajo diskriminatorne in nedemokratične ukrepe.
In some Member States, not only are inclusion policies not applied, but also discriminatory and undemocratic measures are taken by national, regional and local authorities.
V drugih državah članicah so pogosti rasistični, diskriminatorni in včasih nasilni napadi na Rome, nacionalni organi pa ne ukrepajo učinkovito.
In other Member States racist, discriminatory and sometimes violent attacks against Roma are prevalent and the authorities fail to respond effectively.
Kako Svet državam članicam pomaga pri oblikovanju nacionalnih strategij in kaj so doslej države članice storile, da bi jih uresničile?
How does the Council assist Member States in developing their national strategies and what have the Member States done so far in implementing them?
Kako so se države članice odzvale na okvir iz leta 2011?
What is the response of the Member States to the 2011 framework?
Kako se Svet odziva na kršenje temeljnih pravic v državah članicah, zlasti pravice do prostega gibanja in prebivanja?
What actions is the Council taking concerning violations of the fundamental rights in Member States, especially violations of the right to freedom of movement and of residence?
Kako Svet spremlja incidente proti Romom, do katerih prihaja po vsej Evropi?
How does the Council monitor the anti-Roma incidents taking place across Europe?
S katerimi ukrepi namerava nacionalnim organom pomagati pri obravnavanju vprašanja napadov na Rome in njihovemu preprečevanju?
What actions is it taking to help national authorities tackle and prevent such attacks?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000260/2011
Question for oral answer O-000260/2011
V okviru EU za nacionalne strategije vključevanja Romov, ki ga je aprila 2011 predložila Komisija, je določen skupni niz načel in ciljev, ki jih je treba uresničiti na nacionalni in evropski ravni.
The EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies, presented by the Commission in April 2011, establishes a common set of principles and targets to be met both at national and European level.
V okviru se države članice poziva, naj svoje nacionalne romske strategije prilagodijo ciljem tega okvira.
The framework calls on Member States to align their national Roma strategies to its objectives.