natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– Ali Svet namerava, glede na neuspeh barcelonskega procesa in Unije za Sredozemlje, hitro pripraviti dolgoročno politično strategijo, ki se bo učinkovito izvajala na področju Sredozemlja?
– In the light of the failure of the Barcelona Process and of the Union for the Mediterranean, does the Council intend to develop an effective long-term political strategy for the Mediterranean region in the near future?
– Če je to tako, katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti, da bi v tej prehodni fazi in v prihodnje zagotovili spoštovanje demokracije, pravne države in temeljnih pravic v državah severne Afrike, ki so jih prizadeli nedavni ljudski upori?
– If so, what steps does it intend to take to ensure respect for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental freedoms – both during the current transition phase and in the future – in the North African countries affected by the recent popular revolts?
– Na kakšen način namerava razrešiti razhajanja glede stališč, ki so jih izrazile države članice na Evropskem svetu 24. februarja 2011 glede vzpostavitve evropskega azilnega sistema in porazdelitve bremena ( burden sharing )?
– How does it intend to address the differing positions voiced by the Member States at the Council meeting of 24 February as regards the establishment of a European asylum system and burden-sharing?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000047/2011
Question for oral answer O-000047/2011
Zadeva: Oživitev politične strategije Evropske unije v Sredozemlju
Subject: Reactivating the EU political strategy for the Mediterranean
V zadnjem mesecu je na italijanskih obalah pristalo skoraj šest tisoč oseb, tri tisoč samo v obdobju med 11. in 14. februarjem.
During the past month nearly six thousand people have landed in Italy, with three thousand arriving within the space of three days, from 11 to 14 February.
Te številke zelo jasno kažejo, da smo soočeni z izjemnimi razmerami.
These figures constitute crystal-clear evidence of a momentous emergency.
Ob upoštevanju obsega pojava, ki se bo zaostroval, je bolj kot kdajkoli prej nujno, da Evropa pripravi strategijo za pomoč državam, ki same ne bodo kos pretresom, kakršnim smo priča na področju Sredozemlja.
Given the characteristics of this phenomenon, which is certain to grow to a far greater order of magnitude, Europe needs more urgently than ever to draw up a strategy to help the countries concerned, which will never be able on their own to withstand the force of the upheavals now taking place in the Mediterranean area.
Glede tega je Evropska komisija že pokazala pripravljenost pomagati, Svet, ki se je sestal 24. februarja v sestavi notranjih ministrov, pa je Italiji dal na voljo 25 milijonov EUR za nujno reševanje problematike priseljevanja.
The Commission has already shown some encouraging signs of willingness, and the Council, specifically the Home Affairs Ministers meeting on 24 February, has provided EUR 25 million to help Italy cope with the migrant emergency.
Namen teh prvih ukrepov, ki gredo v pravo smer, je sicer reševanje izrednih humanitarnih razmer, pri tem pa ostaja nerešeno bistveno vprašanje, ki je povezano s pripravo nove evropske politične strategije za Sredozemlje.
These first steps in the right direction are intended to tackle the humanitarian emergency, but, be that as it may, there is one fundamental question still to be resolved, namely the new political strategy that Europe should adopt in relation to the Mediterranean.
– Ali Komisija namerava, glede na neuspeh barcelonskega procesa in Unije za Sredozemlje, hitro pripraviti dolgoročno politično strategijo, ki se bo učinkovito izvajala na področju Sredozemlja?
– Given the failure of the Barcelona Process and the Union for the Mediterranean, does the Commission intend in the near future to draw up a long-term political strategy that can be implemented to useful effect in the Mediterranean area?
– Če je to tako, katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti, da bi v tej prehodni fazi in v prihodnje zagotovili spoštovanje demokracije, pravne države in temeljnih pravic v državah severne Afrike, ki so jih prizadeli nedavni ljudski upori?
– If so, what steps will it take to ensure that, during the present transitional phase and in the future, democracy, the rule of law, and fundamental freedoms are respected in the North African countries affected by the recent popular revolts?
– Na kakšen način namerava razrešiti razhajanja glede stališč, ki so jih izrazile države članice na seji Sveta 24. februarja 2011 glede vzpostavitve evropskega azilnega sistema in porazdelitve bremena ( burden sharing )?
– How will it resolve the disagreements among the Member States that emerged at the Council meeting of 24 February regarding the establishment of the European asylum system and burden sharing?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000048/2011
Question for oral answer O-000048/2011
v imenu Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja Zadeva: Odpornost na antibiotike
on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development Subject: Antibiotic resistance
Okrog 50 % antibiotikov v Evropi je predpisanih za uporabo na živalih, zato gre za resnično horizontalno zadevo, ki kliče po dobro usklajenem pristopu.
Around 50% of the antibiotics in Europe are prescribed for animal use, making this a truly cross-cutting matter which calls for a well-coordinated approach.
Ker je odpornost na antibiotike pri ljudeh in živalih enaka in ker si sodobne živinoreje ni mogoče zamisliti brez možnosti uporabe antibiotikov za zdravljenje bolezni, se evropsko kmetijstvo spoprijema z velikansko težavo.
And, since antibiotic resistance is identical for humans and animals – and modern animal husbandry without the possibility to use antibiotics to cure diseases is unimaginable –, the European agriculture sector is facing a gigantic problem.
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 5. maja 2010 o vrednotenju in oceni akcijskega načrta za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010 ( P7_TA(2010)0130 ), v kateri je poudarjena povezava med dobrim počutjem živali, zdravjem živali in zdravjem ljudi, pozval Komisijo in države članice, naj odgovorno obravnavajo čedalje večjo težavo z odpornostjo na antibiotike pri živalih.
In its resolution of 5 May 2010 on the EU Action Plan for Animal Welfare 2006-2010 ( P7_TA(2010)0130 ), the European Parliament - underlining the link between animal welfare, animal health and public health - urged the Commission and the Member States to address the growing problem of antibiotic resistance in animals in a responsible manner.
Evropski parlament je še posebej pozval Komisijo, naj zbira in analizira podatke o uporabi veterinarskih proizvodov, vključno z antibiotiki, da bi zagotovila učinkovito uporabo takšnih proizvodov.
In particular, the European Parliament called on the Commission to collect and analyse data on the use of animal health products, including antibiotics, with a view to ensuring the effective use of such products.
Ali lahko glede na to resolucijo Komisija pojasni:
Further to this resolution, could the Commission explain:
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000049/2011
Question for oral answer O-000049/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Krizne razmere zaradi vulkanskega pepela
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: Volcanic ash crisis
Zaprtje velikega dela evropskega zračnega prostora aprila in maja lani zaradi vulkanskega izbruha na Islandiji je povzročilo velike motnje prometa in gospodarsko škodo ter neposredno prizadelo deset milijonov potnikov.
The closure of large sectors of European air space in April/May last year due to the volcanic eruption in Iceland caused severe traffic disruption and economic damage and affected 10 million passengers directly.
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000050/2011
Question for oral answer O-000050/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Učinkovitost evropskih agencij na področju zaposlovanja, delovnih pogojev in usposabljanja
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Efficiency of the European agencies linked to employment, working conditions and training
Evropska unija ima štiri agencije, dejavne na področju zaposlovanja, delovnih pogojev in usposabljanja (EOROFUND, ETF, OSHA in CEDEFOP).
The European Union has four agencies working in the field of employment, working conditions and training (EUROFUND, ETF, OSHA and CEDEFOP).
Njihov letni proračun je med 15 in 20 milijonov EUR.
Their annual budgets range from EUR 15 to EUR 20 million.
Ob trenutnih pritiskih na proračun po vsej EU je osrednja prednostna naloga državljanom in davkoplačevalcem zagotoviti učinkovitost in resnično dodano vrednost.
With current budget pressures across the EU, a key priority is efficiency and real added value for citizens and taxpayers.
Upoštevajoč navedeno:
With this in mind:
Ali ima Komisija vpeljana merila za učinkovitost in uspešnost teh agencij?
Does the Commission apply efficiency and performance criteria to these agencies?
Če jih ima, ali jih lahko Parlament vidi?
If so, may Parliament see the criteria?
Kakšna je uspešnost agencij glede na ta merila?
How do the agencies perform against these criteria?
Ali lahko Komisija Parlamentu posreduje statistične podatke o uspešnosti agencij?
Is the Commission in a position to present Parliament with figures on the agencies’ performance?
Naloge ETF in CEDEFOP se precej prekrivajo.
There is considerable functional overlap between the ETF and CEDEFOP.
Ali je Komisija razmišljala o združitvi teh agencij, da bi dosegla sinergije in ustvarila prihranke?
Has the Commission considered merging those agencies to achieve synergies and economies?
Kdo zastavlja cilje in določa strategijo teh agencij?
Who sets the objectives and decides the strategy of these agencies?
Ali jih lahko Parlament vidi?
May Parliament see these?
Nasploh se zdi, da prihaja do precejšnjega prekrivanja med poročili o zaposlovanju, ki jih pripravljajo navedene agencije, ter poročili, ki jih pripravlja tematski oddelek Evropskega parlamenta.
More generally, there seems to be considerable overlap between reports on employment matters produced by these agencies and those produced by the Policy Department of the European Parliament.
Ali se to podvajanje izplača?
Is this duplication worthwhile?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000051/2011
Question for oral answer O-000051/2011
v imenu skupine ECR Zadeva: Krizne razmere zaradi vulkanskega pepela
on behalf of the ECR Group Subject: Volcanic ash crises
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000052/2011
Question for oral answer O-000052/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Krizne razmere zaradi vulkanskega pepela
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Volcanic ash crises
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000053/2011
Question for oral answer O-000053/2011
v imenu Odbora za mednarodno trgovino Zadeva: Trgovinski odnosi med EU in Kanado
on behalf of the Committee on International Trade Subject: EU-Canada trade relations
Ali lahko Komisija, ob upoštevanju, da namerava skleniti pogajanja o obsežnem gospodarskem in trgovinskem sporazumu med EU in Kanado do konca leta 2011, odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Bearing in mind that the Commission aims to conclude the negotiations on the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) by the end of 2011, can it answer the following questions:
Ali lahko Komisija, glede na to, da so pogajanja že v napredni fazi, oceni ofenzivne in defenzivne interese EU ter na podlagi svoje presoje vpliva predvidljive koristi in izgube za posamezne sektorje ter socialnoekonomske posledice za EU, ki bodo sledile sklenitvi dokončnega sporazuma?
With the negotiations at such an advanced stage, can the Commission evaluate the EU’s offensive and defensive interests and – based on its impact assessment – the foreseeable sectoral benefits and losses and socio-economic consequences for the EU as a result of the final agreement?
Iz katerih razlogov Komisija pričakuje, da bodo pogajanja o tem sporazumu sklenjena v letu 2011?
What is the basis for the Commission’s expectation that the CETA negotiations can be concluded in 2011?
Ali je bil dosežen sporazum glede uporabe pristopa pozitivnega seznama ali negativnega seznama v zvezi z liberalizacijo storitev, ali obstaja dogovor o opredelitvi in zaščiti storitev splošnega interesa in ali Kanada namerava odpreti trge javnih naročil, ki niso na zvezni ravni?
Has an understanding been reached on whether a ‘positive list’ or a ‘negative list’ approach will be used with regard to services liberalisation, is there an agreement on the definition and protection of ‘services of general interest’, and what are the prospects of Canada opening up sub-federal procurement markets?
Ali obstajajo bistvene razlike med EU in Kanado na področju sanitarnih in fitosanitarnih standardov, ki bi lahko imele negativen učinek na kmetijski sektor EU?
Are there any substantial differences between EU and Canadian sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) standards which could have a negative impact on the EU’s agricultural sector?
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi, da bo končni sporazum vključeval poglavje o trajnostnem razvoju, ki bo skladno z zahtevami Parlamenta, ter obvesti Parlament o kanadskih okoljskih standardih in o njihovi skladnosti s standardi EU?
Can the Commission ensure that the final agreement will include a sustainable development chapter consistent with Parliament’s demands, and inform Parliament about Canadian environmental standards and their compatibility with EU standards?
Kakšen vpliv imajo regulativne določbe o sodelovanju v smislu zakonodajnih pobud na obeh straneh?
What impact do the regulatory cooperation provisions have in terms of legislative initiatives on both sides?
Ali lahko Komisija pojasni, zakaj ni počakala, da Parlament sprejme svoje poročilo o prihodnji investicijski politiki EU, preden je Svetu predlagala osnutek mandata za pogajanja o investicijah, pojasni svoje namere tako v zvezi z vsebino kot tudi s časovnim okvirom pogajanj o investicijah, ter zagotovi, da mehanizem za poravnavo sporov med investitorjem in državo ne bo oviral prihodnje zakonodaje na občutljivih političnih področjih?
Can the Commission explain why it did not wait for Parliament to adopt its report on the future EU investment policy before proposing a draft mandate for investment negotiations to the Council, clarify its intentions regarding both the content of and the timeframe for the investment negotiations, and ensure that the potential investor-to-state dispute settlement mechanism will not inhibit future legislation in sensitive policy areas?
Ali so pogajanja vključevala tudi razpravo o vplivu naftnih vrtin in upoštevala njihov vpliv ter ali Komisija meni, da je Direktiva o kakovosti motornega bencina in dizelskega goriva (98/70/ES) v skladu z regulativnimi zahtevami o sodelovanju, povezanimi z obsežnim gospodarskim in trgovinskim sporazumom?
Has the environmental impact of oil sands drilling been discussed and taken into account in the negotiations, and, in particular, is the Commission of the opinion that the Fuel Quality Directive (98/70/EC) would fall under the CETA’s regulatory cooperation requirements?
Ali bo zahteva Kanade STO, naj vzpostavi uradni forum za reševanje sporov, da se pregleda prepoved EU v zvezi s trgovanjem izdelkov iz tjulnjev vplivala na pogajanja v okviru tega sporazuma in če, kako?
Will Canada’s request to the WTO for the establishment of a formal dispute resolution panel to review the EU ban on seal products affect the CETA negotiations, and, if so, how?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000054/2011
Question for oral answer O-000054/2011
v imenu skupine PPE Zadeva: Vzpostavitev skupnega programa EU za ponovno naselitev
on behalf of the PPE Group Subject: Establishment of a joint EU resettlement programme
Po podatkih urada visokega komisarja OZN za begunce (UNHCR) je treba vsako leto v tretjih državah ponovno naseliti okrog 200.000 beguncev.
According to the UNHCR, about 200 000 refugees are to be resettled in a third country every year.
Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve (LIBE) je na svoji seji 23. februarja 2010 podprl idejo o programu EU za ponovno naselitev in predstavil dva osnutka poročil: enega o sporočilu Evropske komisije o programu EU za ponovno naselitev, drugega o predlaganih spremembah pravil Evropskega sklada za begunce.
The European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE), at its meeting of 23 February 2010, supported the idea of an EU resettlement programme and presented two draft reports: one on the communication of the European Commission on the EU resettlement programme and another on the proposed amendments concerning the European Refugee Fund (ERF).
Evropski parlament je maja 2010 s prepričljivo večino podprl obe poročili, o politični vsebini teh poročil pa je bil med Komisijo, Svetom in EP dosežen pravi konsenz.
Both reports were approved by a large majority of the EP in May 2010 and there was a real consensus between the Commission, the Council and the EP as regards the political content of these reports.
Rok za dokončanje prve obravnave ni bil določen, tako da Evropski parlament skoraj leto dni po svojem glasovanju še vedno čaka na sklep Sveta, da zaključi postopek soodločanja.
Almost one year after the vote by the EP – and as the first reading does not have a deadline for completion – the European Parliament is still waiting for the Council to complete the codecision procedure.
Ali namerava Svet zaključek tega postopka soodločanja uvrstiti na svoj seznam prednostnih nalog?
Is the Council intending to put on its agenda of priorities the completion of this codecision procedure?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000055/2011
Question for oral answer O-000055/2011
v imenu skupine ALDE Zadeva: Sklep vlade ZDA o odpravi preklica sojenj na vojaških sodiščih v zalivu Guantanamo
on behalf of the ALDE Group Subject: US Administration decision to lift the suspension on 'military commission' trials at Guantanamo Bay
Predsednik ZDA Obama je 22. januarja 2009 odredil preklic vložitev novih obtožb na vojaška sodišča, s čimer je zamrznil sklep predhodne vlade ZDA, ki je na vojaških sodiščih omogočal sojenje osumljencem, priprtim v centru za pridržanje v zalivu Guantanamo.
On 22 January 2009, President Obama ordered the suspension of the filing of new ‘military commission’ charges, freezing the previous US Administration’s decision allowing trials of suspects detained in the Guantanamo Bay detention facility by military commissions.
Zamrznitev je pomenila, da naj bi terorističnim osumljencem sodili na zveznih civilnih sodiščih na celinskem ozemlju ZDA, predsednik Obama pa je tudi odredil zaprtje centra Guantanamo v roku leta dni.
The freeze implied that terror suspects were to be tried in federal civilian courts on the US mainland, while President Obama also ordered the closure of Guantanamo within a year.
Predsednik ZDA je 7. marca 2011 preklical dvoletno zamrznitev, s čimer je omogočil obnovitev sojenj na vojaških sodiščih, ter odredil, naj se z zakonodajo podpre praksa neomejenega pridržanja pripornikov brez obtožb, kot je praksa v Guantanamu.
On 7 March 2011, the US President lifted the 2-year freeze, thereby permitting the revival of ‘military commission’ trials, and ordered the practice of holding detainees indefinitely without charge, as happens in Guantanamo, to be backed up by legislation.
Prav tako je predviden proces pregledovanja zadev, ki bo omogočal, da se po prvem letu in nato vsake štiri leta ponovno pregledajo.
A review process allowing for cases to be reconsidered after the first year and then every 4 years thereafter is also foreseen.
V Guantanamu je še vedno 172 pripornikov, od katerih naj bi na kazenskih ali vojaških sodiščih sodili približno 40.
Some 172 detainees remain in Guantanamo, of whom around 40 have been earmarked for trial in either criminal courts or military commissions.
Od 11. septembra 2001 je bila na vojaških sodiščih obravnavana le peščica primerov, pri katerih so osumljenci večinoma priznali krivdo, medtem ko je bilo na civilnih sodiščih uspešnih več kot 170 protiterorističnih sodnih pregonov.
Since 9/11, only a handful of cases have been dealt with in military commissions, mostly with the suspects pleading guilty, while more than 170 anti-terror prosecutions in civilian courts were successful.
Evropski parlament je večkrat pozval k zaprtju centra za pridržanje Guantanamo in pozdravil zaustavitev procesov na vojaških sodiščih ; ZDA je tudi pozval, naj tamkajšnjim pripornikom zagotovijo spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin na podlagi mednarodne in ustavne zakonodaje ZDA ter da se vsem pripornikom, zoper katere imajo ZDA zadostne dokaze, nemudoma pravilno, pravično in javno sodi na pristojnem, neodvisnem in nepristranskem sodišču, in da se v primeru obsodbe te pripornike pošlje v zapore v ZDA .
The European Parliament has repeatedly called for the closure of the Guantanamo detention facility and welcomed the halting of the proceedings of military commissions , calling on the US to ensure that Guantánamo detainees are granted their human rights and fundamental freedoms, on the basis of international and United States constitutional law, and that any detainee against whom the United States has sufficient evidence is properly tried without delay in a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent, impartial tribunal and, if convicted, imprisoned in the United States .
Ali bo Svet, in predvsem visoka predstavnica EU za zunanje zadeve, vladi ZDA predstavil resno zaskrbljenost EU glede nedavnega sklepa o odpravi preklica sojenj na vojaških sodiščih, neomejenega pridržanja, neprestanega odlaganja zaprtja centra za pridržanje v zalivu Guantanamo in dejstva, da se lahko in da se mora boj proti terorizmu izvajati ob popolnem spoštovanju standardov temeljnih pravic?
Will the Council, and notably the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, raise with the US authorities the serious concerns of the EU about the recent decision to lift the suspension of military commission’ trials, indefinite detention, the continuous postponement of the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and the fact that the fight against terrorism can and must be conducted in full respect of fundamental rights standards?
Katere ukrepe in pobude bo Svet, in predvsem visoka predstavnica EU za zunanje zadeve, sprejel glede vlade ZDA za rešitev tega vprašanja?
Which actions and initiatives will the Council, and notably the High Representative, take towards the US authorities to resolve this matter?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000056/2011
Question for oral answer O-000056/2011
Od 11. septembra 2001 je bila na vojaških sodiščih obravnavana le peščica zadev, pri katerih so osumljenci večinoma priznali krivdo, medtem ko je bilo na civilnih sodiščih uspešnih več kot 170 protiterorističnih sodnih pregonov.
Since 9/11, only a handful of cases have been dealt with in military commissions, mostly with the suspects pleading guilty, while more than 170 anti-terror prosecutions in civilian courts were successful.
Ali bo Komisija, in predvsem visoka predstavnica EU za zunanje zadeve, vladi ZDA predstavila zaskrbljenost EU glede nedavnega sklepa o odpravi preklica sojenj na vojaških sodiščih, neomejenega pridržanja, neprestanega odlaganja zaprtja centra za pridržanje v zalivu Guantanamo in dejstva, da se lahko in da se mora boj proti terorizmu izvajati ob popolnem spoštovanju standardov temeljnih pravic?
Will the Commission, and notably the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, raise with the US authorities the EU’s serious concerns about the recent decision to lift the suspension of military commission trials, indefinite detention, the continuous postponement of the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and the fact that the fight against terrorism can and must be conducted in full respect of fundamental rights standards?
Katere ukrepe in pobude bo Komisija, in predvsem visoka predstavnica EU za zunanje zadeve, sprejela glede vlade ZDA za rešitev tega vprašanja?
Which actions and initiatives will the Commission, and notably the High Representative, take towards the US authorities to resolve this matter?
Vprašanje za ustni odgovor O-000057/2011
Question for oral answer O-000057/2011
v imenu skupine S&D Zadeva: Spodbujanje socialnega dialoga v EU
on behalf of the S&D Group Subject: Promoting social dialogue in the EU