natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zato ni lahko razumeti odločitve Komisije, da naloge nadzora nad opazovalnim centrom v Lizboni dodeli komisarju za notranje zadeve, oblikovanje celotne evropske strategije za droge pa uvrsti med zadeve, za katere je pristojen komisar za pravosodje, temeljne pravice in državljanstvo.
It is puzzling, therefore, that the current Commission has decided to give the Commissioner for Internal Affairs the task of supervising the Lisbon-based EMCDDA while making the Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship responsible for formulating the entire EU drugs strategy.
Ali namerava Komisija ohraniti takšno ločitev pristojnosti, ali meni, da bi morala z izboljšanjem sedanjega okvira omogočiti boljši pretok informacij in boljše usklajevanje med lizbonsko agencijo in generalnim direktoratom za pravosodje, svobodo in varnost ter dejavnostmi, ki so dodeljene posameznim komisarjem?
Does the Commission intend to keep these respective responsibilities separate or does it believe it should adjust the current framework so as to ensure information is circulated more effectively and encourage greater coordination between the Lisbon-based EMCDDA, the Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security and the activities falling within the Commissioners' respective remits?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0200/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0200/10
Zadeva: "Evropska soudeležba" pri izgradnji bolgarske jedrske elektrarne Belene
Subject: 'European participation' in the Bulgarian nuclear power station project in Belene
Ker Bolgarija nima finančnih sredstev za dokončanje jedrske elektrarne Belene, predsednik bolgarske vlade Bojko Borisov upa na finančno podporo iz Evrope.
Since Bulgaria does not have the financial resources needed to complete the nuclear power station in Belene, the Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov is now hoping for financial support from Europe.
Če bo projekt spodletel, bo morala Bolgarija poleg že vloženih 1,2 milijard EUR ruskemu izvajalskemu podjetju Atomstrojeksport plačati še dodatnih 600 do 900 milijonov kazni.
Should the project fail, Bulgaria would have to pay between EUR 600 and 900 million in penalties to the Russian company Atomstroyexport, which is contracted to carry out the construction, in addition to the EUR 1.2 billion already invested.
Rusija je Bolgariji ponudila posojilo v višini 2 milijard EUR za nadaljevanje izgradnje, vendar Bolgarija še vseeno upa na evropske investicije, ker noče biti odvisna od ruske pomoči.
Russia had offered Bulgaria a loan of EUR 2 billion to fund further construction work; however, Bulgaria is still hoping for European investment, so as not to become dependent on Russia.
Med obiskom v Sofiji je komisar za energetiko Günther Oettinger predsedniku vlade Borisovu napovedal „evropsko soudeležbo“ in celo zagotovil podporo pri iskanju potencialnih vlagateljev.
On a visit to Sofia, Energy Commissioner Günther Oettinger told Prime Minister Borisov that there would be 'European participation' and also assured him of support in the search for potential investors.
Kakšna bo ta „evropska soudeležba“ konkretno?
What form will 'European participation' take in concrete terms?
Koliko sredstev namerava prispevati Komisija za dokončno izgradnjo jedrske elektrarne Belene?
How much money is the Commission thinking of providing to support the completion of the nuclear power station in Belene?
Ali je Komisija pri obljubi podpore upoštevala tudi znatne čezmejne nevarnosti, ki jih prinaša nova jedrska elektrarna v EU?
When pledging support, did the Commission also consider the significant cross-border dangers that a new nuclear power station in the EU would pose?
Ali bodo morebitna finančna sredstva pogojena z izvedbo rednega postopka za presojo vplivov na okolje?
Will any support be made contingent on the performance of a proper environmental impact assessment?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0201/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0201/10
Zadeva: Strategija EU 2020 - instrumenti za zagotavljanje in nadzor njenega izvajanja v državah članicah
Subject: EU 2020 strategy - Instruments to ensure and monitor implementation by Member States
Evropski parlament je 10. marca 2010 sprejel resolucijo o strategiji EU 2020.
On 10 March 2010, Parliament adopted a resolution on the EU 2020 strategy.
Prav tako je bil v Evropskem svetu dosežen medinstitucionalni sporazum o najpomembnejših prvinah nove strategije zaposlovanja in gospodarske rasti.
An interinstitutional agreement has also been reached in the European Council as to the key elements of a new strategy on employment and economic growth.
Dokončnega osnutka zakonodajnega akta sicer še ni, vendar je že na tej stopnji jasno, da nova strategija ne bo mogla vključevati sankcij za njeno nespoštovanje.
Work on a final draft legal act is still ongoing, but it is clear even at this stage that it will not be possible for the new strategy to include sanctions for failing to adhere to it.
Ali predstavniki Komisije v postopku priprave osnutka razmišljajo o uporabi dodatnih pravnih instrumentov, s katerimi bi se preverjalo, ali države članice izvajajo strategijo EU 2020?
Are the Commission’s representatives in the drafting process considering the use of additional legal instruments to check whether the Member States are implementing the EU 2020 strategy?
Ali bodo predstavljeni predlogi za učinkovite načine izvajanja predpisov, kot so gospodarske sankcije za državo članico, ki bi zavrnila sodelovanje?
Will proposals for effective ways of enforcing provisions be brought forward, such as economic sanctions in the event of a Member State refusing to cooperate?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0202/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0202/10
Zadeva: Evropska organizacija za nadzor športnih dejavnosti
Subject: A European body for monitoring sports
V obdobju, ko se oblikuje trg športnih dejavnosti, se poraja veliko vprašanj o preglednosti pogojev pri športnih transferjih, na primer glede plačil agentom igralcev.
Now that the season for transferring players is starting up, questions abound over the lack of transparency in sports transfers, as in the payment of players' agents.
Ali Komisija meni, da bi bilo priporočljivo, da Evropska unija predlaga ustanovitev evropske organizacije za nadzor teh dejavnosti, oblikovane po francoskem modelu nacionalne direkcije za nadzor upravljanja ali svetovne antidopinške agencije?
Does the Commission consider it desirable for the European Union to propose setting up an independent European body to monitor these activities, based on the French model of the National Management Control Directorate (DNCG) or the World Anti-Doping Agency?
Ali Komisija podpira ustanovitev razširjene organizacije, ki bi vključevala države članice Sveta Evrope, kar bi zagotavljalo nadzor finančne preglednosti za preprečevanje odstopanj in neenakosti pri obravnavi, ki vodi v izkrivljanje konkurence med klubi?
Would the Commission support the establishment of a body open to the Member States of the Council of Europe, which would be responsible for monitoring financial transparency in order to prevent abuse and unequal treatment resulting in distorted competition between clubs?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0203/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0203/10
Zadeva: Sporazum vodilnih članic euroobmočja o mehanizmu pomoči
Subject: Agreement by leading euro area members regarding aid mechanism
Izjava vodilnih članic euroobmočja o grškem gospodarstvu pušča nedogovorjena številna vprašanja o priporočenem ukrepanju in vsebini mehanizmov pomoči.
The statement issued by the leading euro area members regarding the Greek economy leaves unanswered a number of questions regarding both the recommended course of action and the substance of the aid mechanism.
Sporazum določa, da so „članice euroobmočja pripravljene prispevati k usklajenim dvostranskim posojilom“ ter nadaljuje, da „pričakuje, da bodo države članice euroobmočja prispevale na podlagi lastnih kapitalskih ključev ECB“.
The agreement states that ‘euro area member states are ready to contribute to coordinated bilateral loans’ and goes on to say: ‘We expect euro member states to participate on the basis of their respective ECB capital key.’
Ali to izraža pričkovanje ali zavezo?
Does this express a hope or a commitment?
Cilj mehanizma je, da „določi spodbude za vrnitev k tržnemu financiranju s pomočjo oblikovanja cen, ki bo ustrezno glede na tveganje“.
The objective of the mechanism is to ‘set incentives to return to market financing …by risk adequate pricing’.
Kdo bo odgovoren za oceno tveganja?
Where will responsibility for risk assessment lie?
Sporazum tudi določa, da bodo „obrestne mere določene brez posebnih ugodnosti, tj. ne bodo vsebovale nobenih prvin subvencioniranja“.
The agreement also states: ‘Interest rates will be non-concessional, i.e. not contain any subsidy element.’
Trenutno razmiki grških obveznic mejijo na 400 bazičnih točk.
As this question is being written, Greek bond spreads are verging on 400 basis points.
Kakšna obrestna mera bi bila teoretično sprejemljiva, če ne bo vsebovala nobenih prvin subvencioniranja?
What interest rate would theoretically be considered acceptable in so far as it did ‘not contain any subsidy element’?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0204/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0204/10
Zadeva: Podpora uslužbencem javnega sektorja, ki so izgubili zaposlitev
Subject: Support for public sector workers who have lost their jobs
Stopnja brezposelnosti v Evropski unije je bila februarja 2010 10-odstotna in se po napovedih Mednarodne organizacije dela ne bo znižala do začetka 2011.
In February 2010, the unemployment rate in the EU stood at 10%, and ILO forecasts show that this figure will not decrease until early 2011.
Gospodarska kriza je močno prizadela zasebni sektor, kjer je na tisoče podjetij na veliko odpuščalo delavce ali pa so morala prenehati delovati.
The economic crisis has had a dramatic impact on the private sector, with thousands of enterprises either making swingeing job cuts or having to stop operating.
Podjetja, ki jih je prizadela gospodarska in finančna kriza, lahko za podporo ljudem, ki so ostali brez zaposlitve, uporabijo sredstva Evropskega socialnega sklada in Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji.
Enterprises hit by the economic and financial crisis can use both the European Social Fund and the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to support people who have lost their jobs.
Nasprotno pa za javni sektor Evropska unija ne zagotavlja zadostnih instrumentov za podporo ljudem, ki so zaposlitev v javnih institucijah ali subjektih v javnem interesu izgubili zaradi krčenja nacionalnih proračunov, ki ga je povzročila gospodarska in finančna kriza.
When it comes to the public sector, the EU does not have sufficient instruments at its disposal to support people who have lost their jobs at public institutions or with public-interest entities owing to cuts in national budgets arising from the economic and financial crisis.
Poleg tega morajo nekatere države članice zaradi dogovorov, ki so jih sklenile z Mednarodnim denarnim skladom in Evropsko komisijo, da bi se izognile gospodarski krizi, močno zmanjšati število javnih uslužbencev.
Moreover, the undertakings entered into by some Member States with the International Monetary Fund and the European Commission, aimed at escaping the economic crisis, entail massive cutbacks in public sector staff.
Ali bo Svet razmislil o možnosti oblikovanja evropskega instrumenta za podporo uslužbencem v javnem sektorju, ki so izgubili zaposlitev zaradi gospodarske in finančne krize?
Will the Council consider the possibility of creating a European instrument to support public sector workers who have lost their jobs as a result of the economic and financial crisis?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0205/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0205/10
Zadeva: Nerešena vprašanja v zvezi s skupno izjavo Turčija-EU z dne 5. novembra 2009
Subject: Unresolved issues in the Turkey-EU Joint Statement of 5 November 2009
Ob upoštevanju:
Bearing in mind:
skupne izjave, ki so jo 5. novembra 2009 podpisali turški minister za notranje zadeve Atalay, podpredsednik Komisije Barrot in predsedujoči Svetu Billström, in natančneje 3. točke te izjave o ponovnem začetku uradnih pogajanj za sklenitev dogovora o obnovitvi odnosov med Turčijo in EU ter 5. točke, iz katere izhaja, da je bil sprejet dogovor med Turčijo in Frontexom na tehnični ravni,
the Joint Statement issued by Mr Atalay, the Turkish Minister of the Interior, Mr Barrot, Vice-President of the Commission, and Mr Billström, representing the EU Council Presidency, on 5 November 2009, in particular point (3) which refers to the resumption of the formal negotiations on the Turkey-EC readmission agreement and point (5) which states that agreement has now been reached at technical level on the working arrangement between Turkey and Frontex;
vztrajnih motilnih napadov turških zračnih sil na zračna plovila Frontexa, prosim Komisijo, naj odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
the constant harassment of Frontex aircraft by Turkish aircraft;
Kako daleč so pogajanja iz 3. točke skupne izjave?
Will the Commission say: What stage has been reached in negotiations on point (3) of the Joint Statement?
Ali v pogajanjih s Frontexom mogoče prihaja do zapletov?
Is there any linkage with the discussions with Frontex?
Ali so motilni napadi na zrakoplove Frontexa povezani z zavračanjem Turčije, da bi uradno priznala meje EU v Egejskem morju?
Is the harassment of Frontex aircraft linked to Turkey's refusal explicitly to recognise the EU's Aegean borders?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0206/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0206/10
Zadeva: burka, nikab in varnostna politika
Subject: Burqa, niqab and security policies
Vprašanje burke, nikaba in vseh drugih vrst vrhnjih oblačil, ki jih nosijo muslimanske ženske in pokrivajo celo telo, se je doslej običajno obravnavalo z vidika diskriminacije spolov, vendar bi bilo treba pri obravnavi vprašanja vrhnjih oblačil, ki pokrivajo celo telo, poleg vidika temeljnih pravic žensk upoštevati tudi vidik varnostne politike in javnega reda.
The issue of the burqa, the niqab and any other kind of totally enveloping outer garment worn by Muslim women has usually been tackled from the point of view of gender discrimination; nevertheless, the issue of totally enveloping outer garments would maybe deserve to be tackled, besides the issue of women’s fundamental rights, also from the perspective of security policy and public order.
Ali Komisija v zvezi s tem namerava sprejeti ukrepe za izpolnitev zahtev na področju varnosti in spoštovanja temeljnih pravic žensk v Evropski uniji?
Does the Commission intend to promote any measure related to the issue, in order to meet the demands for security and respect of women’s fundamental rights in the EU?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0207/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0207/10
Zadeva: Stanovanja v Flandriji
Subject: Housing in Flanders
Po poročanju medijev Komisija preiskuje štiri domnevne kršitve prava EU v zvezi z dostopnostjo stanovanj v Flandriji.
According to media reports, the Commission is currently investigating four allegations of EU law infringement regarding access to housing in Flanders.
Videti je, da se dve pritožbi nanašata na določbe flamskega odloka o zemljiščih in posesti v zvezi z življenjem v lastnem kraju, pri drugih dveh pa gre za občinske predpise v Zaventemu in Vilvoordeju.
It appears that two of the complaints relate to provisions of the Flemish Land and Property Decree concerning living in one’s own locality and two others concern the municipal regulations applicable in Zaventem and Vilvoorde respectively.
Koliko pritožb v zvezi z dostopom do stanovanj preiskuje Komisija?
How many complaints concerning access to housing are currently being investigated by the Commission?
Ali lahko za vsako pritožbo na kratko opiše pravne argumente pritožnikov, navede, na kateri stopnji je postopek in kateri so naslednji koraki in stopnje, ter napove, kdaj pričakuje, da bo zaključila preiskavo?
Regarding each of the complaints, can the Commission briefly outline the legal arguments advanced by the complainants, indicate what stage has been reached by the proceedings and what are the next steps and stages and say when it hopes to conclude its investigations?
Ali meni, da je možno, da bo proti Belgiji sprožila postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev?
Does it consider infringement proceedings against Belgium to be a possible course of action?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0208/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0208/10
Zadeva: Razmere v evroobmočju; vprašanje Grčije
Subject: The situation in the euro zone and the problems in Greece
Težave, s katerimi se v zadnjem času sooča Grčija, razkrivajo, do česa pripelje opustitev ali zanemarjanje strogega finančnega nadzora v evroobmočju.
The problems recently experienced by Greece show the consequences of abandoning or neglecting strict controls and financial supervision in the euro zone.
Finančna in gospodarska kriza je za sistem skupne evropske valute največji izziv doslej.
The economic and financial crisis is the greatest challenge faced by the common European currency system since its inception.
V celoti je razkrila nepravilnosti, ki se jih je dlje časa prikrivalo.
It has ruthlessly exposed irregularities that had remained hidden for some time.
Pakt stabilnosti in rasti, s katerim naj bi zagotovili izpolnjevanje konvergenčnih meril, so nacionalni organi pa tudi organi Unije nedopustno zanemarjali.
The Stability and Growth Pact, which is intended to ensure the fulfilment of the convergence criteria, has been recklessly disregarded by national and EU bodies.
Ali namerava sprejeti ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovili dosledno izpolnjevanje Pakta stabilnosti in rasti v evroobmočju, da bi v prihodnje preprečili nastanek podobnih razmer?
In light of the above, does the Commission intend to take steps to ensure full compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact in the euro zone, with a view to avoiding any future repeat of the current situation?
Kakšne ukrepe natančno namerava sprejeti?
Exactly what action does the Commission intend to take?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0209/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0209/10
Zadeva: Sodelovanje z nacionalnimi parlamenti
Subject: Cooperation with national parliaments
Z Lizbonsko pogodbo so nacionalni parlamenti prvič dobili pomembno vlogo pri obravnavanju zadev Evropske unije.
Under the Treaty of Lisbon, national parliaments have for the first time been given an important role in dealing with European Union questions.
S tem se nacionalne parlamente spodbuja, da že na začetku dejavno sodelujejo v procesu sprejemanja odločitev v EU.
Thus national parliaments are being encouraged to take an active part in the EU policy-making process at an early stage.
Zelo je pomembno, da se vse oblike medparlamentarnega sodelovanja skladajo z dvema temeljnima načeloma: večjo učinkovitostjo in parlamentarno demokratizacijo.
It is very important that all forms of interparliamentary cooperation accord with two underlying principles: increased efficiency and parliamentary democratisation.
Poudarila bi, da je pomembno podpreti nacionalne parlamente pri njihovem nadzoru osnutkov zakonodaje, preden jo obravnava zakonodajalec Unije, pa tudi pri dejanskem nadzoru njihovih vlad, ko te delujejo v okviru Sveta.
I would emphasise that it is important to support national parliaments in their scrutiny of draft legislation prior to its consideration by the Union legislature, as well as in the effective scrutiny of their governments when they are acting in the Council.
Katere konstruktivne ukrepe je Svet sprejel za izboljšanje sodelovanja z državami članicami po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe?
What constructive steps has the Council taken to improve cooperation with the Member States following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0210/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0210/10
Čeprav se je družba izkazala za eno najuspešnejših irskih podjetij v približno zadnjih dveh desetletjih, imajo številni potniki zaradi njenega varčnega pristopa tudi in predvsem negativne izkušnje.
Though the company has proven itself to be one of the most successful Irish businesses of the last two decades or so, its frugal approach has also caused notably negative experiences for many travellers.
Ker pa Ryanair kot veljaven osebni dokument sprejema le potne liste, ne pa tudi osebnih izkaznic in vozniških dovoljenj, ki jih izda država, številni potniki niso mogli potovati.
However, because Ryanair only accepts passports as valid identification and rejects government- issued identity cards or driving licences, many travellers were therefore unable to travel.
Ali je to, da Ryanair za svoje lete ne sprejema osebnih izkaznic in vozniških dovoljenj, ki jih izda država, kot veljavnih osebnih dokumentov, zakonito?
Is it legal for Ryanair to reject government-issued identity cards and driving licences as valid proof of identity on its flights?
Ali bi bilo mogoče Ryanair prisiliti k sprejemanju teh dokumentov?
Could Ryanair be forced to accept these documents?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0211/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0211/10
Zadeva: Smernice za gospodarstvo in zaposlovanje
Subject: Economic and employment guidelines
Komisija namerava v okviru strategije EU 2020 sprejeti niz smernic, katerih število bo nižje kot v preteklosti.
The Commission is planning to issue fewer guidelines on the EU2020 strategy than has previously been the case.
Svojo odločitev utemeljuje s tem, da bodo manj številčne smernice bolj konkretne in natančne ter bodo upoštevale pridobljene izkušnje, da bi se izognili podobnemu neuspehu, kot pri lizbonski strategiji.
The justification given is that, although there will be fewer guidelines, they will be better defined and more precise, in the light of the setbacks suffered by the Lisbon Strategy.
Menim, da bi manjše število smernic res povečalo učinkovitost, vendar le, če bomo poleg želenih rezultatov sposobni izmeriti tudi neželene učinke in se nanje pripraviti.
In my view, fewer guidelines might indeed be more effective, as long as we are able to assess the unintended as well as the intended effects and to prepare for them.
Ali namerava Komisija poleg oblikovanja smernic za gospodarstvo in zaposlovanje določiti tudi referenčni okvir za države članice?
In addition to defining the economic and employment guidelines, will the Commission provide the Member States with yardsticks?
Z drugimi besedami, ali namerava za odpravo (drugih) neželenih, vendar verjetnih učinkov določiti referenčne točke, da negativni rezultati ne bi prevladali, še zlasti ob upoštevanju nacionalnih značilnosti posameznih držav članic?
In other words, will it provide reference points to enable the unintended but likely (other) negative effects to be forestalled so that the harmful outcomes will not gain the upper hand overall, particularly with regard to the national characteristics of individual Member States?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0212/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0212/10
Zadeva: Finančna podpora za potnike
Subject: Financial support for travellers
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0213/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0213/10
Zadeva: Mala in srednja podjetja ter ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest
Subject: SMEs and job creation
Splošno je priznano, da so mala in srednja podjetja ključ do zmanjševanja brezposelnosti v Evropi, vendar se zaradi ekonomij obsega soočajo z nesorazmernim regulativnim bremenom v primerjavi z večjimi podjetji.
It is widely recognised that small and medium-sized enterprises are the key to reducing unemployment in Europe, yet they face a disproportionate regulatory burden when compared to larger companies due to economies of scale.
Če bi lahko vsako malo in srednje podjetje v Evropi jutri ustvarilo eno delovno mesto, bi to imelo izjemno pozitiven vpliv na stopnje zaposlenosti.
If every SME in Europe could create one job tomorrow, this would have an enormously positive effect on employment levels.
Na kakšen način Komisija spodbuja ustvarjanje delovnih mest prek malih in srednjih podjetij, na primer z regulativno reformo ali naložbami?
What is the Commission doing to promote job creation through SMEs with, for example, regulatory reform and investment?
Katere cilje si je zastavila Komisija in kako jih namerava spremljati?
What targets has the Commission set and how will it propose to monitor these targets?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0214/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0214/10
Zadeva: Sporočilo Evropske komisije o elementih državne pomoči pri prodaji zemljišč in objektov s strani javnih oblasti
Subject: Commission Communication on State aid elements in sales of land and buildings by public authorities