natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
S prerazvrstitvijo palmovih nasadov, ki jo načrtuje Komisija, bodo industrija palmovega olja, lesarska industrija in papirna industrija dobile proste roke za izsekavanje gozdov, uničevanje in ubijanje.
The reclassification of palm oil plantations by the Commission gives carte blanche to the palm oil, logging and paper industries to deforest, to destroy, and to kill.
Organizacije iz celega sveta se borijo za preživetje vrst, ki so potisnjene na rob izumrtja zaradi nasilnega širjenja omenjenih industrijskih panog.
Across the world organisations are fighting for the survival of species being pushed to the brink of extinction because of the aggressive proliferation of such industries.
Katere dodatne korake namerava Komisija sprejeti v mednarodnem letu biotske raznovrstnosti, da bi zaščitila številne ranljive vrste, ki so izpostavljene izkoriščanju zaradi komercialne koristi?
In this, the UN Year of Biodiversity, what additional steps does the Commission intend to take to safeguard the many vulnerable species open to exploitation for commercial gain?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0075/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0075/10
Zadeva: Nepoštena praksa v verigi preskrbe s hrano
Subject: Unfair practices in food supply chain
Kakšno je mnenje Sveta o nepošteni trgovski praksi v verigi oskrbe s hrano?
What is the Council's position on unfair commercial practices operating in the food supply chain?
Kot je Komisija opisala v dokumentu KOM(2009)0591, zmanjšanje cen hrane za proizvajalce ni bistveno vplivalo na potrošnike, medtem ko so visoke cene v istem primeru tako močno spodkopale povpraševanje po evropskih prehrambenih proizvodih, da večina kmetov svoje blago prodaja pod proizvodno ceno.
As the Commission outlined in COM(2009)0591, reduction in food prices for producers has not been passed on in any meaningful way to consumers, while the same high food prices have undermined demand in European food products to the extent that most farmers are selling their goods at below the cost of production.
Številni prodajalci so poročali o primerih, ko so veliki distributerji od zahtevali plačilo dobaviteljev že zgolj za skladiščenje njihovih proizvodov.
Many working in the retail sector have reported instances of large multiples demanding money from suppliers just to stock their products.
Ali Svet meni, da bi bilo treba zaradi teh razmer sprožiti vseevropsko preiskavo glede spoštovanja pravil konkurence?
Does the Council feel that this situation is worthy of a larger EU-wide investigation on competition grounds?
Ali Svet meni, da so pogajanja o cenah med prodajalci in dobavitelji/proizvajalci neenaka in da glede na to, da je dobaviteljev/proizvajalcev veliko več kakor prodajalcev, obstaja možnost izkoriščanja?
Does the Council recognise unequal bargaining power exists between retailers and suppliers/producers and that this is in danger of being exploited, given that the number of producer/suppliers of food is far greater than the number of retailers?
Kako bi se po mnenju Sveta morali spopasti s to težavo in ali bo Svet v bližnji prihodnosti izdal kakršno koli sporočilo o tem vprašanju?
How does it propose to tackle this problem and will the Council be issuing any communications on the matter in the near future?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0076/10/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION H-0076/10/rev.1
Zadeva: UniCredit krši načelo konkurenčnosti in prenosa kapitala
Subject: Breach of rules on competition and capital transfers by UniCredit
Junija 2005 sta UniCredit in podjetje Pirelli, ki sta sodelovala v okviru sklenjenega dogovora, podpisala sporazum Chopin s podjetjem Pekao (ne da bi o tem obvestila trg ali organe za finančni nadzor, čeprav bi to morala storiti).
UniCredit and the developer Pirelli, acting jointly and in collaboration, signed the ‘Chopin Agreement’ with Pekao SA in June 2005 but failed to inform the market and the financial supervisory authority of this, in spite of the requirement to do so.
Po tem je aprila 2006 UniCredit kot večinski delničar podjetju Pekao naložil podpis neugodnega delničarskega sporazuma s podjetjem Pirelli.
As a result, UniCredit, as the dominant shareholder, forced Pekao to conclude an unfavourable partnership agreement with Pirelli in April 2006.
UniCredit in Pirelli sta kapitalsko povezana v družbi Olimpia, katere direktor je predsednik UniCredita Alessandro Profumo.
Pirelli and UniCredit are connected through their capital shares in the Olimpia company, in which Alessandro Profumo, CEO of UniCredit, holds an executive post.
Vzporedno s tem je v družbi Olimpia prišlo do asimetrične transakcije, saj je Pirelli od UniCredita kupil delnice Telecoma Italia, ki so bile dejansko brez vrednosti.
In parallel with this, an asymmetrical transaction has taken place at Olimpia, involving the purchase by Pirelli of worthless Telecom Italia shares from UniCredit.
V zvezi z mojim predhodnim vprašanjem ( H-0506/09 ) sprašujem Komisijo, ali namerava posredovati v tej zadevi, saj gre za subjekta, ki delujeta v dveh državah članicah Evropske unije?
Further to my previous question on the subject ( H-0506/09 ), does the Commission intend to intervene in this matter, given that companies operating in more than one Member State are involved?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0077/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0077/10
Zadeva: Železniška nesreča v Buizingenu in elektronski varnostni sistem
Subject: Railway accident in Buizingen and electronic safety system
Za hudo železniško nesrečo v Buizingenu v Belgiji 15. februarja 2010 naj bi bila kriva odsotnost elektronskega varnostnega sistema, ki samodejno zavre vlak, če ta pelje mimo rdeče luči.
The serious railway accident in Buizingen, Belgium, on 15 February 2010 is being blamed on the absence of an electronic safety system which automatically applies trains' brakes if they pass a red light.
Poleg sistemov avtomatske zaščite vlakov (ATP), ki jih imajo nekatere države članice že leta, se v Evropi pospešeno uvaja ERTMS (evropski sistem za vodenje železniškega prometa).
In addition to the national automatic train protection (ATP) systems, which have existed for years in some Member States, work is proceeding apace on the introduction of ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System) in Europe.
V kolikšni meri in od kdaj različne države članice opremljajo svoje železniške proge in vlake z nacionalnimi sistemi ATP?
To what extent and for how long have the various Member States been equipping their railway lines and trains with national ATP systems?
Kako poteka uvajanje ERTMS v različnih državah članicah (na vlakih in na železniških progah)?
What is the state of play with the introduction of ERTMS in the various Member States (both on trains and on railway lines)?
Ali se državam članicam, ki še nimajo nacionalnih sistemov zaščite vlakov, splača vlagati v njih, glede na uvajanje ERTMS in visoke zneske, ki jih je treba vložiti v spremembo?
In the case of Member States which do not yet have national train protection systems, is it still worthwhile to invest in them, in view of the ongoing introduction of ERTMS and the major investment involved in a changeover?
Kako se preprečuje nevarnost, da bi bila železniška infrastruktura opremljena z ERTMS, vlaki pa ne, oziroma obratno?
How is the danger averted that railway infrastructure may be equipped with ERTMS but the trains may not, or vice versa?
Ali je trenutno ta problem prisoten na primer pri medkrajevnem železniškem prometu na progi Liège-Aachen?
Does this problem arise at present, for example for intercity railway traffic on the Liège-Aachen line?
Ali bi se ob tem lahko kaj naučili v zvezi z liberalizacijo železnic v Evropi?
What lessons should we perhaps learn here with regard to the liberalisation of the railways in Europe?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0078/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0078/10
Zadeva: Evropsko gospodarsko upravljanje
Subject: European economic governance
Ob globoki finančni krizi, ki je prizadela Grčijo, pa tudi finančnem neravnovesju v drugih državah članicah euroobmočja, se postavlja vprašanje statike, dinamike in izvedljivosti izgradnje EMU.
The very profound financial crisis in Greece and the financial imbalance in other eurozone Member States have raised questions about the ability of EMU to withstand static and dynamic pressures.
Nedvomno ima konsolidacija javnih financ v državi članici euroobmočja zanjo resne posledice.
There is no doubt that retrenchment in public finances of a Member State of the eurozone is the responsibility of that State.
Res je tudi, da je finančna kriza pokazala, da ni soodvisnosti med celovito in enotno monetarno unijo ter nepopolno ekonomsko unijo, ki v prevladuje EU.
However, the financial crisis has thrown into relief the lack of correlation between a full, single monetary union and an incomplete economic union in the EU.
Ali je Svet pripravljen predlagati vzpostavitev takšnega evropskega monetarnega sklada, ki bo imel sredstva in zmogljivosti za posredovanje, s katerimi bo mogoče pokriti strukturne pomanjkljivosti EMU, kar bo odražalo bolj formalno in usklajeno evropsko gospodarsko upravljanje?
Will the Council propose plans for the establishment of a European Monetary Fund with the funds and powers of intervention necessary to offset the structural shortcomings of EMU and to reflect a more formal and coordinated form of European economic governance?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0079/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0079/10
Zadeva: Evropsko gospodarsko upravljanje
Subject: European Economic Governance
Ali je Komisija pripravljena predlagati vzpostavitev takšnega evropskega monetarnega sklada, ki bo imel sredstva in zmogljivosti za posredovanje, s katerimi bo mogoče pokriti strukturne pomanjkljivosti EMU, kar bo odražalo bolj formalno in usklajeno evropsko gospodarsko upravljanje?
Will the Commission propose plans for the establishment of a European Monetary Fund with the funds and powers of intervention necessary to offset the structural shortcomings of EMU and to reflect a more formal and coordinated form of European economic governance?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0080/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0080/10
Zadeva: Odnosi med EU in Rusijo: program španskega predsedstva
Subject: EU-Russia relations: Spanish Presidency agenda
Špansko predsedstvo EU je pripravilo ambiciozen program v zvezi z odnosi med EU in Rusijo, prizadeva si namreč za zaključek pogajanj z Rusijo o novem sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, sporazum z Rusijo o vzpostavitvi režima brez vizumov in za napredek pri sporazumu o prosti trgovini med EU in Rusijo.
The Spanish Presidency of the EU has set out an ambitious agenda when it comes to EU-Russia relations – it would like to see the conclusion of negotiations with Russia on the new partnership and cooperation agreement (PCA), an agreement with Russia on a visa-free regime, as well as progress on a free-trade agreement between the EU and Russia.
Če Rusija želi skleniti sporazum o prosti trgovini z EU, mora najprej postati članica Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
In order to conclude a free-trade agreement with the EU, Russia first needs to become a member of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
Kakšne so dejanske možnosti, da bo Rusija kmalu postala članica STO?
Are there tangible prospects that Russia will join the WTO any time soon?
Ali ima Svet izdelano posebno strategijo, kako Rusijo prisiliti, da se pridruži STO?
Does the Council have a particular strategy on how to compel Russia to join the WTO?
Ali Svet meni, da je bil dosežen znaten napredek pri pogajanjih z Rusijo o novem sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju?
Does the Council see any substantial progress as concerns the negotiations with Russia on the new PCA?
Ali Svet meni, da je zdaj pravi čas za zamisel o prostotrgovinskem režimu glede na nesoglasja o tej temi znotraj EU?
Does the Council consider that the idea of a free-trade regime with Russia is timely considering the disagreements within the EU on the issue?
Ali Svet meni, da je Rusija bolje pripravljena na režim brez vizumov kot druge države partnerice EU, kot so Ukrajina, Moldavija ali Gruzija?
Does the Council consider Russia to be more prepared for a visa-free regime than other partners of the EU, such as Ukraine, Moldova or Georgia?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0081/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0081/10
Zadeva: Trgovinski odnosi med EU in Rusijo
Subject: Trade relations between the EU and Russia
Že ob nastopu finančne krize na začetku leta 2008 je Rusija uvedla številne "začasne" zaščitne protikrizne carinske dajatve za mnogo uvoženih proizvodov, na primer za mesne in mlečne izdelke, pohištvo, nekatere izdelke iz jekla, kamione, televizijske sprejemnike in drugo.
Since the beginning of the financial crisis at the end of 2008, Russia has imposed a number of protectionist ‘temporary’ anti-crisis tariffs on a number of imports, such as meat and milk products, furniture, some steel products, trucks, television sets and others.
Poleg tega je 1. januarja 2010 začela veljati carinska unija med Rusijo, Belorusijo in Kazahstanom.
What is more, on 1 January 2010 a customs union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan came into existence.
Zunanje dajatve, dogovorjene med tremi državami, temeljijo predvsem na ruskih tarifah.
The external tariffs that were agreed by the three countries are mostly based on Russia’s tariffs.
Posledica tega je, da so se za 30 % vseh proizvodnih linij, izvoženih iz EU v Rusijo, zvišale carinske dajatve.
As a result, a total of 30% of the product lines exported from the EU to Russia have seen increases in tariffs.
Znano je, da je največja težava EU dejstvo, da Rusija ni članica Svetovne trgovinske organizacije in zanjo torej niso zavezujoča pravila te organizacije, ki omejujejo enostranske odločitve o zvišanju uvoznih dajatev, in drugi trgovinski omejevalni ukrepi.
It is widely recognised that the main problem the EU faces is that Russia is not a member of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and is therefore not bound by the WTO rules restricting unilateral increases in import tariffs and other trade-restrictive measures.
Kako Komisija ocenjuje sedanje trgovinske težave EU z Rusijo in kako jih misli reševati?
How does the Commission assess the EU’s current trade problems with Russia, and how does it intend to address them?
Ali ima EU izdelano posebno strategijo za rešitev vprašanja članstva Rusije v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji?
Does the EU have a particular strategy on how to address the issue of Russia’s membership of the WTO?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0082/10/rev.1
ORAL QUESTION H-0082/10/rev.1
Zadeva: Uredba 2001/18/ES o gensko spremenjenih organizmih
Subject: Directive 2001/18/EC on genetically modified organisms
Uredba 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Svetane zagotavlja varnosti niti glede horizontalnega prenašanja virusov genskega materiala iz gensko spremenjenih organizmov na druge pridelke niti glede oblikovanja kmetijskih površin brez gensko spremenjenih organizmov za biološko in konvencionalno pridelavo.
Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council provides neither for safeguards against the horizontal transfer of viruses contained in genetic material from GMO crops to other crop species nor for the creation of GMO-free areas for organic and conventional agricultural production.
Katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi Uredba 2001/18/ES vsem državam članicam dovoljevala, da bi po potrebi lahko uvedle dodatne omejitve za okolje obremenjujoče sproščanje gensko spremenjenih organizmov modificiranih vrst tistih kmetijskih pridelkov, ki so bistvenega pomena za gospodarstvo zadevne države, in za opredelitev površin brez gensko spremenjenih organizmov, in tako zaščitile biološko in konvencionalno kmetijstvo ter ohranile biotsko raznovrstnost?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to ensure that Directive 2001/18/EC will allow any Member State, if it so wishes, to introduce additional restrictions on the release into the environment of genetically modified varieties of agricultural crops of major economic importance to the country in question, and to designate GMO-free areas in order to safeguard organic and conventional farming and protect biodiversity?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0083/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0083/10
Zadeva: načrt za večjo usklajenost in nadzor gospodarske politike članic euroobmočja
Subject: Scheme to reinforce economic policy co-ordination and surveillance of eurozone members
Ali lahko Svet podrobneje pojasni predloge, da bi imele članice euroobmočja lahko večji vpliv na to, kako naj se vodijo gospodarstva v preostalih članicah euroobmočja?
Could the Council elaborate on suggestions that eurozone countries may have a greater say in how the economies of their fellow eurozone members states are run?
Po eni od zadnjih napovedi Komisije naj bi Evropska komisija skladno s pooblastili iz Lizbonske pogodbe še pred junijem predložila načrt za večjo usklajenost in medsebojni nadzor gospodarske politike.
A recent Commission announcement said that the Commission would come forward with a scheme to reinforce economic policy co-ordination and counter-surveillance before June, in line with the powers under the Lisbon Treaty.
Ali Svet podpira ta pristop za večje gospodarsko usklajevanje in ali Svet meni, da bi ta nov pristop okrepil euroobmočje?
Does the Council endorse this approach for greater economic co-ordination and does the Council believe that this new approach would strengthen the eurozone?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0084/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0084/10
Zadeva: državna pomoč malim in srednjim podjetjem, ki pridelujejo kmetijske proizvode
Subject: State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products
Če kmetje pridelka nimajo zavarovanega, se vsa ponujena nadomestila zmanjšajo za 50 %.
Where farmers have no crop insurance any compensation offered to them will be reduced by 50%.
Kakšen je status odstavka 8 člena 11 v državah članicah,v katerih nobena zavarovalna družba ne nudi zavarovanja pridelkov?
In Member States where crop insurance is not offered by any insurance company what is the status of Article 11, Paragraph 8?
Ali lahko Komisija zagotovi podatke o instrumentih za oceno tveganja, ki so trenutno na voljo v državah članicah, zlasti v tistih državah članicah, kjer so kmetom na voljo zavarovalni proizvodi, kakšno stopnjo zavarovanja nudijo ti zavarovalni proizvodi, in kako se financirajo, na primer, ali jih financira država, kmetje ali pa je financiranje skupno?
Can the Commission provide information on risk assessment instruments currently available in Member States, specifically those Member States where insurance products are offered to farmers, for instance what level of cover is provided by these insurance products and how these products are financed – are they funded by the state, funded by farmers or jointly funded?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0085/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0085/10
Zadeva: Skorajšnja združitev letalskih družb Olympic Air in Aegean Airlines
Subject: Imminent merger of Olympic Air and Aegean Airlines
Letalski družbi Olympic Air in Aegean Airlines sta 11. februarja 2010 v podobnih izjavah za javnost potrdili skupne dogovore o „prihodnjem sodelovanju”, čeprav je tisk poročal o skorajšnji združitvi teh dveh družb.
On 11 February 2010 Olympic Air and Aegean Airlines released similar statements confirming their talks on 'future cooperation', although press reports have appeared about the imminent merger of the two companies.
Na tak potek dogodkov, ki bi privedel do zasebnega monopola in izgube 2.500 delovnih mest, so se ostro odzvale organizacije za varstvo potrošnikov.
This scenario, which would lead to a private monopoly and the loss of 2 500 jobs, has elicited a sharp response from consumer protection organisations.
Ali lahko Komisija ob upoštevanju, da imata družbi pod nadzorom tako rekoč ves domači potniški promet, da ima Grčija zaradi geografskih danosti več letališč kot druge države članice in da je pričakovati zvišanje cen domačih prevoznin ter povečanje števila in obsega subvencioniranih storitev, odgovori na naslednja vprašanja:
Bearing in mind that the two companies control virtually the entire domestic passenger market, that Greece has more airports than other Member States owing to its geography and that it is expected that there will be an increase in domestic fares and in the number and volume of subsidised services, will the Commission say:
Ali bi lahko grški odbor za konkurenco zaradi dejstva, da imata podjetji pod nadzorom 97 % domačega potniškega prometa, zavrnil odobritev take združitve?
Does the fact that the two companies control 97% of domestic passenger traffic constitute a reason for the Hellenic Competition Commission to refuse approval for such a merger?
Ali bi lahko grška država zavrnila podelitev imena in logotipa Olympic Aira novi družbi, ki bi po tej združitvi nastala, ter omejila višino cen domačih letalskih prevozov, ker bi imela nova družba 97-odstoten delež pri domačem potniškem prometu?
Is the Greek State able to refuse to give the Olympic name and logo to the new company that would be created by such a merger and impose a ceiling on domestic fares, since the new company would have a 97% share of domestic passenger traffic?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0086/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0086/10
Zadeva: Nezakoniti finančni tokovi, davčne utaje in države v razvoju
Subject: Illicit financial flows, tax evasion and developing countries
Dokazov o škodljivih posledicah nezakonitih finančnih tokov za države v razvoju je precej.
Today we have sufficient evidence about the harmful consequences of illicit financial flows for developing countries.
Čeprav so čezmejni nezakoniti finančni tokovi v precejšnji meri skriti in težko izmerljivi, pa po ocenah verjetno dosegajo med 1 in 3 bilijonov dolarjev letno.
Even if cross-border illicit financial flows are largely hidden and difficult to measure, estimates are reasonably clustered in a range of $1 trillion to $3 trillion annually.
Svetovna banka navaja številke od 1 do 1,6 bilijonov letno, od tega po ocenah polovica ­– med 500 in 800 milijard letno –, izvira iz držav v razvoju.
The World Bank quotes figures of $1 trillion to $1.6 trillion annually, of which half—$500 to $800 billion a year—is estimated to come from developing countries.
Nezakonito odtekanje denarja iz držav v razvoju, ki po ocenah znaša 500 do 800 milijard dolarjev, ustvarja škodljive gospodarske razmere, ki najhuje prizadenejo revne.
The estimated $500 to $800 billion a year of illicit money passing out of developing countries is the most damaging economic factor affecting the poor.
Izčrpa rezerve trde valute, poviša inflacijo, zniža znesek pobranih davkov in ima mnoge druge posledice, ki slabijo možnosti držav v razvoju.
It drains hard currency reserves, increases inflation, reduces tax revenues and has many other consequences that undercut developing countries' opportunities.
Kakšna prizadevanja in pobude vlaga ali namerava vložiti Evropska unija v naslednjih mesecih za boj proti davčni utaji in begu kapitala v države v razvoju in iz njih?
What efforts and initiatives is the EU undertaking, or does it intend to take in the coming months, to fight against tax evasion and capital flight in and from developing countries?
Kako lahko okrepimo zmožnost finančnega poslovodenja držav v razvoju?
How can we strengthen developing countries' fiscal management capacity?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE H-0087/10
ORAL QUESTION H-0087/10
Zadeva: Zelena knjiga o prostovoljstvu
Subject: Green Paper on volunteering
Ali je Komisija razmislila o tem, da bi lahko za večjo ozaveščenost o vrednosti prostovoljnega dela v EU v sklopu predlaganih pobud za praznovanje evropskega leta prostovoljstva pripravila obsežno zeleno knjigo o prostovoljstvu, s katero bi spodbujala in priznavala prostovoljstvo ter temu prispevala dodano vrednost?
In order to raise awareness of the value of volunteering throughout the EU, would the Commission consider, in conjunction with the proposed initiatives to celebrate the European Year on Volunteering, drawing up a comprehensive Green Paper on volunteering to facilitate, recognise and add value to volunteering?