natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali namerava v tej zadevi uporabiti svojo pooblastila in pozvati vlade držav članic, naj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za nadzor in ukrepe pregona, s katerimi bi se Evropa znebila sramotnega suženjskega dela?
Does it intend to make use of its own powers in this matter, and also to call on Member State governments to take appropriate monitoring and enforcement measures, with a view to ridding Europe of the shameful practice of slave labour?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0091/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0091/06
Zadeva: Uporaba kasetnih bomb s strani Izraela na jugu Libanona
Subject: Israel's use of cluster bombs in south Lebanon
Ko je s pomočjo Združenih narodov 14. avgusta začela veljati prekinitev ognja, je postalo jasno, da so polja, domovi, vrtovi in glavne ceste na celotnem območju južnega Libanona polne neeksplodiranih kasetnih bombam, ki jih je med vojno odvrgel Izrael.
Since the UN-brokered ceasefire took hold on 14 August, it has become clear that farmland, homes, gardens and highways across south Lebanon are littered with unexploded cluster bombs dropped by Israel during the war.
Strokovnjaki ZN za odstranjevanje bomb so do konca avgusta na 359 različnih lokacijah odkrili 100.000 neeksplodiranih kasetnih bomb, vsak dan pa odkrijejo nove lokacije.
By the end of August UN clearance experts had detected 100 000 unexploded cluster bomblets at 359 separate sites, and new locations have been added every day since.
Zaradi bomb je bilo ubitih ali hudo ranjenih veliko libanonskih civilistov, ki bodo kljub uradnemu koncu vojne, umirali tudi v prihodnje, ko se bodo skušali vrniti v svoja mesta in vasi ter začeti znova svoje kar se da normalno življenje.
As a result, many Lebanese civilians have been killed or terribly wounded and will be killed in the future, even now the war is officially over, in their efforts to go back to their towns and villages and resume some type of normal life.
Čeprav je izraelska vojska izjavila, da je bila uporaba kasetnih bomb po mednarodnem pravu zakonita in v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi, ali tudi Svet meni, da je bila uporaba takšnega orožja na civilnih in gosto poseljenih območjih med vojno nezakonita in je pomenila kršitev ženevskih konvencij?
Although the Israeli army has said that its use of cluster bombs has been 'legal under international law and in conformity with international standards', does the Council share the opinion that the use of such weapons in civilian and densely populated areas during this war has been illegal and in violation of the Geneva Conventions?
Koliko evropskega denarja, namenjenega obnovi in sanaciji te regije, bo treba nameniti odstranjevanju neeksplodiranih bojnih sredstev na jugu Libanona, vključno s kasetnimi bombami, kopenskimi minami in strelivom iz osiromašenega urana, ter koliko časa bo za to potrebno?
How much EU money allocated to assist in the restructuring and rehabilitation of the region will have to be invested to clear the unexploded ordnance, including cluster bombs, landmines and depleted uranium shells in south Lebanon, and how long will it take to complete this task?
Kakšni so stiki z izraelsko vlado, da bi Izraelce prepričali k sodelovanju pri tej nalogi?
What contacts have been taken up with the Israeli Government to persuade the Israelis to participate in this task?
Kakšen je bil njihov dosedanji odziv?
What has been their reaction so far?
Ali je EU vzpostavila dialog z ameriško vlado o njenih preiskavah glede izraelske uporabe kasetnih bomb ameriške izdelave na jugu Libanona; če je odgovor pritrdilen, kakšen je dosedanji rezultat tega dialoga?
Has the EU established a dialogue with the US Government about its investigation into Israel's use of US-manufactured cluster bombs in south Lebanon and if so, what has been the outcome of that dialogue so far?
Kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti, da se prepreči uporaba evropskega zračnega prostora in letališč za nadaljnji prevoz kasetnih bomb ameriške izdelave v Izrael?
What measures have been taken to prevent European airspace and airfields being used for further transports of US-manufactured cluster bombs to Israel?
Kako si bo EU prizadevala za ugoditev večkratnih zahtev Evropskega parlamenta o popolni prepovedi uporabe kasetnih bomb po vsem svetu?
What efforts will be undertaken by the EU to follow up the repeated demand of the European Parliament that cluster bombs should be globally banned?
Katere ukrepe izvaja Svet, da bi dosegel pravno zavezujočo mednarodno prepoved vseh oblik uporabe, izdelave, kopičenja zalog in prevoza kasetnih bomb, ki bi presegla veljavne zakonske omejitve uporabe proti civilistom?
What measures is the Council taking to achieve a legally binding international ban on all uses, as well as production, stockpiling and transfer of cluster bombs, beyond existing legal restrictions on use against civilians?
Ali je Svet pripravljen pozvati države članice EU, naj kasetne bombne umaknejo z nacionalnih zalog?
Is the Council prepared to ask EU Member States to eliminate cluster bombs from their national stockpiles?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0092/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0092/06
Zadeva: Uporaba kasetnih bomb s strani Izraela na jugu Libanonu
Subject: Israel's use of cluster bombs in south Lebanon
Odkar je ob posredovanju Združenih narodov 14. avgusta začela veljati prekinitev ognja, so polja, domovi, vrtovi in glavne ceste na celotnem območju južnega Libanona polni neeksplodiranih kasetnih bomb, ki jih je med vojno odvrgel Izrael.
Since the UN brokered cease-fire took hold August 14, it has become clear that farmlands, homes, gardens and highways across South Lebanon are littered with unexploded clusterbombs dropped by Israel during the war.
Strokovnjaki ZN za odstranjevanje bomb so do konca avgusta na 359 različnih lokacijah odkrili 100.000 neeksplodiranih kasetnih bomb, vsak dan pa odkrijejo nove lokacije.
By the end of August UN-clearance experts had detected 100,000 unexploded cluster bomblets at 359 separate sites and new locations have been added every day since.
Zaradi bomb je bilo ubitih ali hudo ranjenih veliko libanonskih civilistov, ki bodo kljub uradnemu koncu vojne, umirali tudi v prihodnje, ko se bodo skušali vrniti v svoja mesta in vasi ter začeti znova svoje kar se da normalno življenje.
As a result, many Lebanese civilians have been killed or terribly wounded and will be killed in the future even now the war is officially over in their efforts to go back to their towns and villages and resume some type of normal life.
Ali tudi Komisija meni, da je bila uporaba kasetnih bomb na civilnih in gosto poseljenih območjih med vojno nezakonita in je pomenila kršitev ženevskih konvencij, čeprav je izraelska vojska izjavila, da je bila uporaba takšnega orožja po mednarodnem pravu zakonita in v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi?
Although the Israeli army has said that its use of clusterbombs has been 'legal under international law and in conformation with international standards', does the Commission share the opinion that the use of such weapons in civilian and densely populated areas during this war has been illegal and violating the Geneva Conventions?
Koliko evropskega denarja, namenjenega obnovi in sanaciji te regije, bo treba nameniti odstranjevanju neeksplodiranih bojnih sredstev na jugu Libanona, vključno s kasetnimi bombami, kopenskimi minami in strelivom iz osiromašenega urana, ter koliko časa bo za to potrebno?
How much EU money, allocated to assist in the restructuration and rehabilitation of the region, will have to be invested to clear the unexploded ordnance, including clusterbombs, landmines and depleted uranium shells in South Lebanon and how long will it take to complete this task?
Kakšni so stiki z izraelsko vlado, da bi Izraelce prepričali k sodelovanju pri tej nalogi?
Which contacts have been taken up with the Israeli government to convince the Israelis to participate in this task?
Ali je EU vzpostavila dialog z ameriško vlado o njenih preiskavah glede izraelske uporabe kasetnih bomb ameriške izdelave na jugu Libanona; če je odgovor pritrdilen, kakšen je dosedanji rezultat tega dialoga?
Has the EU established a dialogue with the US government about their investigation into Israel's use of US manufactured clusterbombs in South Lebanon and if yes, what has been the outcome of that dialogue so far?
Kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti, da se prepreči uporaba evropskega zračnega prostora in letališč za nadaljnji prevoz kasetnih bomb ameriške izdelave v Izrael?
Which measures have been taken to avoid that European airspace and airfields are used for further transports of US manufactured clusterbombs to Israel?
Kako si bo EU prizadevala ugoditi večkratnim zahtevam Evropskega parlamenta glede popolne prepovedi uporabe kasetnih bomb po vsem svetu?
Which efforts will be undertaken by the EU to follow up the repeated demand of the European Parliament that clusterbombs should be globally banned?
Kako ukrepa Komisija, da bi dosegla pravno zavezujočo mednarodno prepoved vseh oblik uporabe, izdelave, kopičenja zalog in prevoza kasetnih bomb, ki bi presegla veljavne zakonske omejitve uporabe proti civilistom?
Which measures is the Commission undertaking to achieve a legally binding international ban of all uses, as well as production, stockpiling and transfer of clusterbombs, beyond existing legal restrictions on use against civilians?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena pozvati države članice EU, naj kasetne bombne umaknejo iz nacionalnih zalog?
Is the Commission prepared to ask EU member states to eliminate clusterbombs from their national stockpiles?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0093/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0093/06
Zadeva: Dodeljevanje preferencialov GSP+
Subject: Granting of GSP plus preferences
Po sistemu splošnih tarifnih preferencialov (GSP) EU podpira države v razvoju tako, da omogoča lažji dostop njihovega blaga do svojih trgov.
Under its General System of Preferences (GSP), the EU supports developing countries by giving their goods easier access to its markets.
Zadnji sistem splošnih tarifnih preferencialov EU, ki je bil sprejet 27. junija 2005 z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005 , bo veljal do konca leta 2008.
The EU's recent GSP scheme was adopted on 27 June 2005, through Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 , and will be effective until the end of 2008.
V uredbi je predviden poseben spodbujevalni režim za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje (tako imenovani "GSP+") z dodatnimi ugodnostmi za tiste države, ki upoštevajo nekatere mednarodne standarde za človekove pravice in pravice delavcev, varstvo okolja, boj proti drogam in dobro upravljanju.
This regulation also envisages a special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance (the so-called 'GSP plus') which provides additional benefits for countries implementing certain international standards in human and labour rights, environmental protection, the fight against drugs, and good governance.
Države upravičenke so se med drugim zavezale, da bodo ratificirale in izvajale načela, zapisana v konvencijah Mednarodne organizacije dela Združenih narodov (ZN/ILO).
Beneficiary countries commit themselves among other things to ratifying and implementing standards enshrined in Conventions by the United Nations' International Labour Organisation (UN/ILO).
Komisija je v sklepu, ki ga je izdala 21. decembra 2005, sklenila, da bo petnajstim državam dodelila posebne spodbude.
The Commission in its decision of 21 December 2005 has decided to grant special incentives to 15 states.
V nekaterih izmed njih pa se domnevno kršijo načela iz konvencij ZN/ILO, zlasti tista, ki varujejo svobodo združevanja, kolektivna pogajanja, nediskriminacijo pri zaposlovanju in prenehanje otroškega in prisilnega dela.
Allegedly, in some of them, there are flaws in the implementation of the principles laid down in the UN/ILO Conventions, especially those which protect freedom of association, collective bargaining, non-discrimination in employment and ending of child and forced labour.
Ali lahko Komisija Evropski parlament obvesti o tem, kako učinkovite so države upravičenke sistema GSP+ pri izvajanju konvencij ILO?
Could the Commission inform the European Parliament about the effectiveness of the implementation of the ILO conventions by the GSP plus beneficiary countries?
Kako Komisija spremlja in nadzoruje izvajanje konvencij ZN/ILO v državah upravičenkah GSP+?
How does the Commission monitor and control the implementation of the GSP plus ILO/UN Conventions?
Kako se v rednem postopku nadzora in spremljanja seznanja s položajem teh držav?
How is the position of the beneficiary countries taken into account in the regular process of control and monitoring?
Ali glede na sklepe ustreznih nadzornih organov v kateri od sedanjih držav upravičenk GSP+ prihaja do hujših in načrtnih kršitev načel iz konvencij, naštetih v delu A priloge III, zaradi katerih bi bil po členu 16 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005 upravičen začasni odvzem preferencialov?
On the basis of the conclusion of the relevant monitoring bodies, are there, in any of the current GSP plus beneficiary countries, serious and systematic violations of the principles laid down in the Conventions listed in Part A of Annex III which, according to Article 16 of Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005, would justify a temporary withdrawal of preferences?
USTNO VPRAŠANJE Z RAZPRAVO O-0094/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0094/06
Zadeva: Pregled stanja programa Galileo
Subject: Taking stock of the Galileo programme
Evropski parlament je program Galileo v okviru svojih zakonodajnih in proračunskih pristojnosti v celoti podprl in priznal, da je Galileo strateški projekt in eden najpomembnejših stebrov lizbonske strategije, ki ponuja velike možnosti malim in srednjim podjetjem.
The European Parliament has given its full support to the Galileo Programme, through its legislative and budgetary responsibilities , recognising that Galileo is a strategic project, one of the most important pillars of the Lisbon strategy, and offers great opportunities to SMEs.
Evropski inženirji in načrtovalci, ki so dejavni v okviru Evropske vesoljske agencije in vesoljske industrije, so opravili odlično delo.
European engineers and developers working within the European Space Agency and in the space industry have done a great job.
Prvi poskusni satelit GIOVE-A je svoje glavno poslanstvo že izpolnil, tehnični vidiki so uresničeni, za nadaljevanje projekta pa je zdaj najpomembnejše dobro upravljanje.
The first experimental satellite GIOVE-A has already fulfilled its main mission, the technical aspects are in place, and now the most important element for bringing the project forward is good governance.
Časovni razpored je odločilen za gospodarsko učinkovitost in uspeh programa.
Timing is crucial for the commercial viability and success of the programme.
Glede na prvotni načrt iz leta 2005 je v vseh treh fazah prišlo do precejšnjih zamud.
The three phases are well behind the original plan of 2005.
Zaradi podaljšanja razpisnega postopka je ogrožen skupni časovni razpored projekta.
The tendering procedure is being prolonged, thus jeopardising the overall timing of the project.
Kako namerava Komisija preprečiti nadaljnje zamude?
How does the Commission intend to avoid further delay?
Za Parlament, ki deluje kot proračunski organ, so pomembni ukrepi, ki so potrebni za zagotavljanje povračil.
For Parliament as a budgetary authority, the necessary steps to ensure repayments are important.
Seznanjen je z načrtovanim predlogom o izvajanju politike dostopa do vladne storitve do konca leta 2006 ter z zeleno knjigo o aplikacijah programa Galileo, ki jo bo Komisija predstavila konec leta 2006.
The planned proposal concerning the implementation of the Public Regulated Service access policy by the end of 2006 and the Green Paper on Galileo Applications, which the Commission will present at the end of 2006, are noted.
Potem ko bodo proračunski organi odobrili skupni proračun projekta (vključno z obveznostmi glede odgovornosti), bo nujno okrepiti vlogo nadzornega organa programa Galileo.
After the approval of the whole project budget (including liability commitments) by the budgetary authorities, a stronger supervisory position for the Galileo Supervisory Authority will be indispensable.
Ali namerava Komisija spremeniti sedanji osnutek uredbe, da to zagotovi?
Does the Commission intend to amend the current draft regulation in order to ensure this?
V prihodnjih fazah programa Galileo bo pomembno sodelovanje s tretjimi državami.
Cooperation with third countries in the future phases of Galileo is important.
Kako bo Komisija vključila Parlament v pripravo mednarodnih pogajanj, zlasti upoštevaje institucionalna vprašanja?
How will the Commission involve Parliament in the preparation of the international negotiations, with particular reference to institutional questions?
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. septembra 2005.
EP legislative resolution of 5 September 2005.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0095/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0095/06
Zadeva: Končni rezultati protidampinške preiskave o obutvi iz Kitajske in Vietnama
Subject: The definitive results of the anti-dumping investigation concerning footwear from China and Vietnam
Komisija je 30. avgusta 2006 sprejela predlog za uvedbo dokončne protidampinške carinske dajatve za določeno usnjeno obutev iz Kitajske in Vietnama.
On 30 August 2006, the European Commission adopted a proposal for definitive anti-dumping duties on certain leather shoes from China and Vietnam.
Evropska komisija je predlagala carinsko dajatev v višini 16,5% za Kitajsko in carinsko dajatev v višini 10% za Vietnam za določeno usnjeno obutev.
The European Commission has proposed duties of 16.5% for China and 10% for Vietnam for certain leather shoes.
Ta predlog se bistveno razlikuje od začasnega predloga iz julija 2006.
This proposal substantially differs from the provisional one circulated in July 2006.
Namen tega prvega predloga, ki ga je zavrnila velika večina držav članic, je bil v antidampinško uredbo prvič uvesti odložljiv carinski sistem, ki bi temeljil na tarifnih kvotah.
This first proposal, rejected by an overwhelming majority of Member States, aimed at introducing, for the first time ever in an antidumping Regulation, a deferred duty system based on tariff quotas.
Ali Svet lahko poroča o vidikih tega primera, za katerega je neposredno odgovoren?
Can the Council report on aspects of this case under its direct responsibility?
Lahko Svet pojasni svojo končno odločitev (še vedno neznano v času vložitve tega vprašanja za ustni odgovor)?
Can the Council justify its final decision (still unknown at the time of tabling this oral question)?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0096/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0096/06
Namen tega prvega predloga, ki ga je zavrnila velika večina držav članic, je bil v protidampinško uredbo prvič uvesti odložljiv carinski sistem, ki bi temeljil na tarifnih kvotah.
This first proposal, rejected by an overwhelming majority of Member States, aimed at introducing, for the first time ever in an antidumping Regulation, a deferred duty system based on tariff quotas.
Ali Komisija lahko pripravi poročilo o glavnih zaključkih preiskave in utemeljitev predlaganih ukrepov?
Can the Commission provide a report of the main conclusions of this investigation as well as a justification of the measures proposed?
V kakšni meri so se v primeru obutve upoštevali novi politični in metodološki pristopi?
To what extent have new policy and methodological approaches been followed in the footwear case as compared to established practice?
V kakšni meri se bodo tovrstni pristopi uporabljali v prihodnjih primerih?
To what extent are such new approaches likely to be followed in future cases?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0097/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0097/06
Zadeva: Pokvarjeno meso / Izvajanje zakonodaje o varni hrani
Subject: Rotten meat / implementation of food safety legislation
Ob nedavnih ponavljajočih se škandalih v Nemčiji v zvezi z mesom, neprimernim za prehrano ljudi (pokvarjeno meso), in njegovim izvozom v več drugih držav članic ter ob veliki razširjenosti nedovoljenih genetsko spremenjenih sort riža po Evropi se porajajo resna vprašanja o delovanju uradnih kontrol živil v državah članicah.
The recent repeated scandals involving meat unfit for human consumption (rotten meat) in Germany and its export to several Member States , as well as the widespread presence of unauthorised GM rice varieties in rice sold throughout the EU, have raised serious questions over the functioning of official food controls in the Member States.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 882/2004 so države članice dolžne preoblikovati svoje uradne kontrole živil in krme tako, da se jih izvaja glede na tveganja in dovolj pogosto.
On the basis of EU Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 , Member States are obliged to reform their official food and feed controls so that controls are carried out on a risk basis and with appropriate frequency.
V nekaterih državah članicah se uredbe očitno (še) ne izvaja ustrezno.
This regulation is obviously not (yet) properly implemented in some Member States.
Kakšne ukrepe predlaga Komisija za zagotovitev neodvisnih kontrol, izvedenih na podlagi tveganj, s katerimi bi v državah članicah odvrnili nevarnost, ki jih za zdravje predstavlja meso, neprimerno za prehrano, in zagotovili, da odpadki ne zaidejo v prehranjevalo verigo?
What measures can the Commission suggest to ensure risk-based and independent controls in the Member States that prevent health risks linked to meat unfit for consumption and ensure such waste does not find its way into the food chain?
Ali je Komisija po analogiji z Direktivo 2003/4/ES o dostopu javnosti do informacij o okolju pripravljena oblikovati direktivo EU o obveščanju potrošnikov, ki bi olajšala dostop do informacij o podjetjih, vpletenih v goljufije in v distribucijo izdelkov, neprimernih za prehrano ljudi, v prehranjevalni verigi?
Will the Commission draw up an EU directive on consumer information, in analogy to Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to environmental information, which would facilitate access to information on companies involved in the fraudulent distribution along the food chain of material unfit for human consumption?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena sprejeti pobudo, da v za javnost dostopnem in preglednem registru EU objavi imena nosilcev živilske dejavnosti, ki ne spoštujejo zakonodaje?
Will the Commission take an initiative on publishing in an open and transparent EU register the names of food business operators that do not comply with legislation in this area?
Ali bi bilo treba sistem „smeškov”, ki se uporablja v nekaterih državah članicah, uvesti po celotni EU?
Should the system of ‘smileys’ applied in some Member States be applied throughout the EU?
vsaj v Avstrijo, Belgijo, na Češko, v Italijo, Luksemburg in na Nizozemsko UL L 165, 30.4.2004, str.
Including Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p.
UL L 41, 14.2.2003, str.
OJ L 41, 14.2.2003, p.
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0098/06
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0098/06
Zadeva: Ponovno vključevanje bolnic z rakom dojk na trg dela in uporaba sredstev socialnega sklada za redno izobraževanje zdravstvenih delavcev na področju raka dojk
Subject: Reintegration of breast cancer patients into the job market and use of social funds for continued training of health professionals in the field of breast cancer
Glede na lizbonsko strategijo, katere cilj je do leta 2010 povečati delež zaposlenih žensk na 60%, in zaradi visokega števila primerov raka dojk, ki ga letno odkrijejo v Evropski uniji (po zadnji oceni, dobljeni na podlagi podatkov iz registra raka Mednarodne agencije za raziskave raka, je to 275.000), je ponovno vključevanje žensk, ki so prebolele raka dojk, na trg dela nujna prednostna naloga.
Given the Lisbon strategy, which aims for a women's employment quota of 60% by 2010 and the large number of breast cancer cases diagnosed annually in women in the European Union (275 000 as currently estimated on the basis of the cancer registry data of the International Agency for Research on Cancer), the reintegration of breast cancer survivors into the job market is an urgent priority.