natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali bo zagotovila, da se bodo ta srečanja zaključila, in poskrbela za objavo njihovih sklepov?
Will the Commission ensure that these meetings will be completed and that their conclusions will be published?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0141/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0141/08
Zadeva: Sodobna kultura kot sredstvo za krepitev in utrjevanje regionalnega razvoja
Subject: Contemporary culture as a means of strengthening and stabilising regional development
Razvoj Evrope je odvisen od moči kulture, ki jo je treba trajnostno uporabljati.
The development of Europe depends on the power of culture, which must be used in a sustainable manner.
S tem bi zagotovili Evropo Evropejcev, ne zgolj Evrope institucij, administracije in predpisov.
This will help ensure that we have a Europe of Europeans, and not just a Europe of institutions, administrations and regulations.
Evropske potencialne potrebe v zvezi s kulturo je treba strateško uporabiti za strukturno in spodbujevalno politiko, s katero Evropa podpira razvoj svojih regij.
Europe's cultural potential needs to be strategically utilised for the structural and promotional policies through which Europe supports the development of its regions.
Kdaj bo predstavila zeleno knjigo, v kateri bodo navedene možne dejavnosti sodobne kulture, katerih namen bo krepitev in utrjevanje regionalnega razvoja?
When is the Commission going to present the Green Paper with a possible range of actions of contemporary cultural activities aimed at strengthening and stabilising regional development?
Ali bi bilo mogoče to nalogo dodeliti akterjem civilne družbe namesto javnim organom ali kulturnim zvezam?
Could this task be assigned to civil society actors rather than public organs or cultural associations?
Ali in kako bo Komisija podprla regionalne konference skupaj z regionalnimi organi in lokalno civilno družbo?
Is the Commission going to support regional conferences together with regional authorities and the local civil society and if so, how?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0142/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0142/08
Koliko sredstev je bilo v okviru evropskega instrumenta za demokracijo in človekove pravice (EIDHR) namensko razporejenih za Belorusijo za leti 2007 in 2008?
What funds have been earmarked for Belarus within the EIDHR for 2007 and 2008?
Koliko sredstev je bilo v okviru evropskega instrumenta za demokracijo in človekove pravice porabljenih za projekte za Belorusijo v letu 2007?
What funds have been spent on projects for Belarus within the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) in 2007?
Kakšne vrste pobudam je bila namenjena ta podpora?
What kind of initiatives were they supporting?
Kje imajo sedež organizacije, upravičene do sredstev, ki niso beloruske?
Where are the non-Belarusian beneficiary organisations based?
Koliko sredstev je bilo v okviru evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta (ENPI) porabljenih za projekte za Belorusijo v letu 2007?
What funds have been spent on projects for Belarus within the ENPI framework in 2007?
Kakšno je sodelovanje med Komisijo in nevladnimi organizacijami, ki niso beloruske, pri projektih, namenjenih Belorusiji?
What is the state of cooperation between the Commission and non-Belarusian NGOs as far as projects aimed at Belarus are concerned?
Ali so te nevladne organizacije zmožne učinkovito uporabiti financiranje EU za podporo civilne družbe v Belorusiji?
Are these NGOs able to use EU funding efficiently to support civil society in Belarus?
Koliko sredstev je v letu 2008 porabila Komisija za projekte nevladnih organizacij, namenjene Belorusiji, in iz katerih proračunskih vrstic so bila sredstva?
What funds have been spent by the Commission for NGO projects aimed at Belarus in 2008 and under which budget lines?
Kdaj je Evropska komisija objavila možnost financiranja za Belorusijo za leto 2008?
When the announcement on possible 2008 funds for Belarus issued by the European Commission?
Koliko sredstev je bilo porabljenih za Belorusijo v okviru decentraliziranega sodelovanja?
What funds have been spent for Belarus under CDC (Decentralised Cooperation)?
Kakšen delež od 6 milijonov EUR, predvidenih za kandidate iz Belorusije, Moldavije in Ukrajine v okviru programa Erasmus Mundus – področje zunanjega sodelovanja, je bil porabljen za Belorusijo in v kakšnem časovnem obdobju?
From €6 million set aside for candidates from Belarus, Moldova and the Ukraine under the Erasmus Mundus External Co-operation Window (EMECW), how much has been spent for Belarus and over what period of time?
Koliko študentov in akademikov je uporabilo te štipendije in to podporo?
How many students and academics have used these scholarships and grants?
Koliko sredstev se načrtuje za Belorusijo v obliki štipendij za posamezne države v okviru instrumentov Komisije za zunanje sodelovanje, ki dopolnjujejo novi program Erasmus Mundus?
What funds are planned for Belarus in country-specific scholarships within the Commission's external cooperation instruments complementing the new Erasmus Mundus programme?
Ali Evropska komisija načrtuje razvoj programov za podporo malim in srednje velikim beloruskim podjetjem v okviru „vzhodnega partnerstva“, da bi spodbujala evropske tržne vrednote?
Does the European Commission plan to develop programmes to support Belarusian small and medium-sized enterprises in the framework of 'Eastern partnership' in order to promote European market values?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0143/08
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0143/08
, v imenu Odbora za promet in turizem ,
, on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ,
Zadeva: Akcijski načrt o mobilnosti v mestih
Subject: The Action Plan on Urban Mobility
Evropska komisija je v zeleni knjigi o novi kulturi mobilnosti v mestih (KOM(2007)0551), v akcijskem načrtu za logistiko tovornega prometa (KOM(2007)0607) in v sporočilu o strategiji za izvajanje interiorizacije zunanjih stroškov (KOM(2008)0435) za jesen 2008 napovedala objavo akcijskega načrta o mobilnosti v mestih.
In the Green Paper on Urban Mobility (COM(2007)0551), as well as in its Freight Transport Logistics Action Plan (COM(2007)0607) and its Communication on a strategy for the internalisation of external costs (COM(2008)0435), the European Commission announced the publication of its Action Plan on Urban Mobility in autumn 2008.
Akcijski načrt doslej še ni bil objavljen.
To date, the Action Plan has still not been published.
Ali bo Komisija glede na malo preostalega časa do konca sedanjega zakonodajnega obdobja ta akcijski načrt objavila v naslednjih tednih?
In view of the short timescales due to the end of the current legislature, will the Commission make public the Action Plan in the next year weeks?
Če ne, kakšni so razlogi za dodatno zamudo?
If this is not the case, what are the reasons for this further delay?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0001/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0001/09
Zadeva: Ocena učinka kompromisov, doseženih v sklopu pogajanj v Dohi o dostopu na nekmetijske trge (NAMA) in storitvah konec julija 2008
Subject: Impact assessment of the compromises reached in the Doha negotiations on NAMA and services at the end of July 2008
V sklopu kroga pogajanj o razvojni agendi iz Dohe v Ženevi julija 2008 je bil dosežen kompromis glede področja nekmetijskih izdelkov in storitev.
At the Doha Development Round negotiations in Geneva in July 2008 a compromise was found in the area of non-agricultural goods and services.
Ta dosežek šteje za začetni korak na poti do dokončne sklenitve kroga pogajanj iz Dohe.
This result is said to be the starting point for any final conclusion of the Doha round.
Zato je bistveno poznati njegove možne učinke na evropsko gospodarstvo.
It is therefore essential to know about the possible effects on the European economy.
Je Komisija opravila oceno učinka omenjenega paketa iz julija 2008 na evropsko industrijo in poslovni sektor za posamezne sektorje in države članice?
Has the Commission made any impact assessment of the above July 2008 package concerning its effect on the European industry and business sector, per sector and Member State?
Lahko Komisija podrobno presodi predvidene spremembe trgovinske bilance v industrijskih sektorjih, tako da izračuna predlagano prilagodljivost za sektorje, za katere naši trgovinski partnerji pričakujejo, da bodo najuspešnejši in kjer lahko povzročijo najhujšo škodo?
Can the Commission give a detailed judgement on the estimated changes the trade balance in the sectors of industry, calculating the proposed flexibility for those sectors where our trade partners expect the most gains or where they can do most harm?
Lahko Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu zagotovi podatke o dolgoročnem učinku tega na primerjano konkurenčnost industrije EU in poslovnega sektorja EU ter konkurenčnost naših trgovinskih partnerjev, zlasti iz gospodarstev v vzponu?
Can the Commission provide the European Parliament with information about the long-term effect on the comparative competitiveness of EU industry and the EU business sector and those of our trading partners especially from the emerging economies?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0002/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0002/09
Zadeva: Zaščita tradicionalnih narodnih, etničnih in priseljenskih manjšin v Evropi
Subject: Protection of traditional national, ethnic and immigrant minorities in Europe.
Zaščita tradicionalnih narodnih in etničnih manjšin, urejanje medetničnih odnosov in vključevanje priseljenskih manjšin v družbo so izjemno pomembni izzivi za Evropsko unijo, njeno stabilnost, varnost, blaginjo, dobre odnose s sosedi, legitimnost doma in v tujini ter verodostojnost.
Protecting traditional national and ethnic minorities, addressing inter-ethnic relations, and integrating immigrant minorities are crucially important challenges for the European Union, for its stability, security, prosperity, good neighbourhood relations, internal and external legitimacy and credibility.
Ali københavnska merila za spoštovanje pravic manjšin veljajo samo za nove države članice in države kandidatke, ali pa so zavezujoča za vse države članice?
Are the Copenhagen criteria for respecting minority rights valid only for the new Member States and candidate countries or are they also binding on all Member States?
Kdaj in v kolikšni meri je kršenje pravic manjšin notranja zadeva države članice?
When and to which extent is a minority rights violation a domestic matter for the Member States?
Katere zahteve narodnih manjšin veljajo za upravičene z vidika političnih “norm” Evropske unije?
Which demands made by national minorities are considered legitimate from the perspective of the political ‘norms’ of the European Union?
Ali bi morala EU na podlagi lizbonske pogodbe izoblikovati pravno zavezujoč sistem pravil za zaščito tradicionalnih narodnih manjšin in mehanizmov za nadzor?
Should the EU elaborate a legally binding system of traditional national minority protection norms and control mechanisms on the basis of the Lisbon Treaty?
Ali namerava Komisija v okviru skupne politike priseljevanja EU, ki še nastaja, izoblikovati enotne standarde za vključevanje novih, priseljenskih manjšin?
Does the Commission plan to elaborate a common set of standards regarding the integration of the new, migrant minorities in the framework of the common EU immigration policy currently under development?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi morale vse države članice EU ratificirati okvirno konvencijo za varstvo narodnih manjšin in evropsko listino za regionalne in manjšinske jezike?
Does the Commission agree that all Member States of the EU should ratify the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages?
Ali večjezičnost po mnenju Komisije vključuje regionalne in manjšinske jezike?
Does the Commission consider multilingualism to include regional or minority languages?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da so različne oblike avtonomije oziroma samouprave na podlagi načela subsidiarnosti najboljša rešitev za zaščito manjšinskih skupnosti?
Does the Commission agree that various forms of autonomy/self-governance on the basis of the principle of subsidiarity are the best solutions for the protection of minority communities?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi moralo biti spremljanje ravni zaščite manjšin v državah članicah in državah pristopnicah prednostna naloga agencije za temeljne pravice?
Does the Commission agree that monitoring the level of protection of minorities in the Member States and accession countries should be given priority in the work of the Fundamental Rights Agency?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0003/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0003/09
Zadeva: Vpliv finančne krize na avtomobilsko industrijo
Subject: Impact of the financial crisis on the car industry
– Sedanja finančna in gospodarska kriza negativno vpliva na evropsko gospodarstvo na splošno, zlasti pa na sektorje, kot so avtomobilska industrija in njeni podizvajalci, ki občutijo posledice krize v ekonomskem in socialnem smislu ter glede zaposlovanja, prizadelo pa jih je tudi že obsežno odpuščanje in izplačevanje odpravnin.
The current financial and economic crisis is generally hitting the European economy, and in particular sectors such as the car industry and its subcontractors, which are feeling the effects of the crisis at an economic, social and employment level and are already affected by large-scale dismissals and redundancy payments.
– Evropska komisija je 26. novembra predstavila sveženj predlogov, v katerem je pozvala države članice in druge institucije EU, kot sta Evropska investicijska banka in Evropska banka za obnovo, naj podprejo nov dogovor v industrijskem sektorju glede gospodarstva EU v tem težavnem obdobju, tako da izboljšajo energetsko učinkovitost in ohranijo raven zaposlenosti.
On 26 November 2008 the European Commission launched a package of measures asking Member States and other EU institutions such as the EIB and the EBRD to support a new industrial deal for the EU economy at this difficult time by improving energy efficiency and sustaining employment levels.
– Zakonodajni ukrepi v energetsko-podnebnem svežnju, sprejetem decembra, bi lahko imeli bistveno vlogo pri spodbujanju zelenih in energetsko varčnih naložb v avtomobilskem industrijskem sektorju in drugih zadevnih sektorjih, ki bodo nedvomno koristile tudi povezanim sektorjem.
The achievement of the legislative measures in the climate-energy package adopted in December could play a fundamental role in promoting green and energy-saving investments in the car industry sector as well as in other relevant sectors, with undoubted benefits to the related sectors.
Kako namerava Svet okrepiti usklajeno posredovanje vseh držav članic, ki predvideva spodbude za avtomobilski industrijski sektor ter njegove satelite v povezavi z inovacijskimi politikami in zmanjšanjem emisij CO2?
How does the Council intend to reinforce coordinated intervention by all Member States which provides for incentives for the car industry sector and its satellites linked to innovation policies and reductions of CO2 emissions ?
Ali Svet meni, da je treba države članice pozvati, naj izvajajo in posodobijo svoje notranje postopke, da bodo zagotovile večjo prilagodljivost in učinkovitost Evropskega socialnega sklada ter njegovo zmožnost pravočasnega odzivanja na krizne situacije?
Does the Council consider it necessary to urge Member States to implement and update their internal procedures in order to make the European Social Fund more flexible, effective and capable of responding promptly to crisis situations?
Ali Svet meni, da je treba glede na ekonomski in socialni vpliv sedanjih razmer revidirati Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji, da bi zagotovili kohezijske politike v EU?
Does the Council consider it necessary to revise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), given the economic and social impact of the current situation, in order to ensure cohesion policies within the EU?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0004/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0004/09
Kako namerava Komisija okrepiti usklajeno posredovanje vseh držav članic, ki predvideva spodbude za avtomobilski industrijski sektor ter njegove satelite v povezavi z inovacijskimi politikami in zmanjšanjem emisij CO2?
How does the Commission intend to reinforce coordinated intervention by all Member States which provides for incentives for the car industry sector and its satellites linked to innovation policies and reductions of CO2 emissions ?
Ali Komisija meni, da je treba države članice pozvati, naj izvajajo in posodobijo svoje notranje postopke, da bodo zagotovile večjo prilagodljivost in učinkovitost Evropskega socialnega sklada ter njegovo zmožnost pravočasnega odzivanja na krizne razmere?
Does the Commission consider it necessary to urge Member States to implement and update their internal procedures in order to make the European Social Fund more flexible, effective and capable of responding promptly to crisis situations?
Ali Komisija meni, da je treba glede na ekonomski in socialni vpliv sedanjih razmer revidirati delovanje Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji, da bi zagotovili kohezijske politike v EU?
Does the Commission consider it necessary to revise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), given the economic and social impact of the current situation, in order to ensure cohesion policies within the EU?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0005/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0005/09
Zadeva: Stanje sistema SIS II
Subject: State of play of SIS II
Evropski parlament je s postopkom soodločanja leta 2006 sprejel pravno podlago za vzpostavitev sistema SIS II in je kasneje vedno podprl – čeprav pod pogoji – začasne rešitve za premostitev številnih nastalih težav, ki sta jih predlagala Svet in Komisija.
The European Parliament adopted in codecision the legal basis for the creation of the SIS II in 2006 and has subsequently always endorsed - albeit with conditions - the interim solutions proposed by Council and Commission to overcome the numerous difficulties that have arisen.
Prejšnje leto sta se Komisija in Svet po negativnih rezultatih številnih testov (zlasti testa operativnega sistema) odločila za obdobje sanacije, da bi poskusila odpraviti obstoječe težave.
Last year, following the negative result of several tests (mainly the operational system test), the Commission and Council decided to have a remediation period, in order to try to solve the persisting problems.
To obdobje se je končalo, testi pa so bili ponovljeni decembra 2008; čeprav je prišlo do nekaterih izboljšav in nadgraditve centralnega sistema, se zdi, da nova različica centralnega sistema ne deluje pravilno, sistem SIS II pa ne more začeti delovati, če se ne reši treh velikih vprašanj.
This period ended and the tests were repeated in December 2008, and although some improvements were made and there has been an upgrade of the central system, it seems that this new version of the central system does not work as it should, and the SIS II can therefore not start operating, if three major issues are not solved.
Ta vprašanja zadevajo izgubo sporočil, težave glede delovanja in stabilnosti sistema, kakovost podatkov in postopek usklajevanja (težave v postopku uskladitve nacionalnih kopij s centralnim sistemom).
These issues concern loss of messages, problems in terms of performance and robustness of the system and finally data quality and the consistency process (problems within the process of synchronising the national copies with the central system).
Evropski parlament ni bil uradno obveščen o tem pomembnem razvoju dogodkov in s tem, da je delovna skupina SIS TECH naročila izdelavo preizkusnega scenarija, ki temelji na nadgradnji sistema SIS 1+ v sistem SIS II.
The European Parliament has not been officially informed about these important developments, including the fact that a study scenario based on SIS 1 + evolution into SIS II has been commissioned by the SIS TECH Working Party.
Svet naj torej razloži:
The Council is therefore asked to explain:
Zakaj Evropski parlament ni bil uradno obveščen o teh resnih težavah pri razvoju sistema?
- Why has the EP not been officially informed about these substantial problems in the development of the system?
Ali te težave pomenijo, da bo treba sistem ponovno vzpostaviti?
- Will these problems imply a need to rebuild the system?
Ali se sedaj predvideva alternativni scenarij za sistem SIS II in, če to drži, ali bi lahko bil tak scenarij nadgradnja sistema SIS 1+?
- Is an alternative scenario to SIS II currently envisaged and, if yes, can the upgrading of the SIS 1+ be one of them?
Katere so vse obstoječe težave in zakaj je do njih prišlo?
- What are all the problems that still exist and why?
Koliko truda bo še treba vložiti v to, da se bodo težave odpravile, koliko časa bo za to potrebno in koliko sredstev bo za to še treba nameniti iz proračuna EU?
How much effort is still needed in order to solve them, how long will it take and how much more will it cost the EU budget?
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0006/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0006/09
Komisija naj torej razloži:
The Commission is therefore asked to explain:
VPRAŠANJE ZA USTNI ODGOVOR Z RAZPRAVO O-0007/09
ORAL QUESTION WITH DEBATE O-0007/09
Zadeva: Glasovalne pravice oseb, ki nimajo latvijskega državljanstva, na lokalnih volitvah
Subject: Voting rights for non-citizens of Latvia in local elections
Avtorji velikega števila peticij, vloženih pri Odboru za peticije, zahtevajo glasovalne pravice na lokalnih volitvah za osebe, ki nimajo latvijskega državljanstva.
The authors of a large number of petitions before the Committee on Petitions seek voting rights for non-citizens of Latvia in local elections.
Ko je postala Latvija neodvisna, so dobili latvijsko državljanstvo le tisti, ki so ga imeli že pred letom 1940, in njihovi potomci.
After restoration of independence, only citizens of the pre-1940 Latvia and their descendants had their Latvian citizenship restored.
Drugi lahko državljanstvo pridobijo le z naturalizacijo, nekatere osebe pa nimajo pravice niti do tega.
Others are entitled to obtain citizenship only through naturalisation; some persons are not entitled to be naturalised.
V letih od 1995 do 2007 je bilo naturaliziranih le 127,786 oseb.
Only 127 786 persons were naturalised in 1995-2007.
Tako je bilo 1. januarja 2008 brez državljanstva še vedno 372,421 oseb, kar je 16,36% vsega prebivalstva.
As of 1 January 2008, there remained 372 421 non-citizens (16.36% of the total population).
Manj kot odstotek oseb, ki nimajo državljanstva, so latvijskega porekla.
Less than 1% of non-citizens are ethnic Latvians; non-citizens are almost totally persons belonging to ethnic minorities (ethnic Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Poles, Lithuanians, Jews).
Skoraj vsi ostali, ki so brez državljanstva, pa pripadajo etničnim manjšinam (Rusi, Belorusi, Ukrajinci, Poljaki, Litovci in Židje): Osebe brez državljanstva, ki predstavljajo 26,1% prebivalstva v Rigi, 22,6% v Daugavpilsu, 24,8% v Liepaji, 21,6% v Jurmali in 21,8% v Ventspilsu, tako ne morajo sodelovati pri ustvarjanju lokalne politike v največjih mestih .
Non-citizens, who are 26.1% of the population in Riga, 22.6% in Daugavpils, 24.8% in Liepāja, 21.6% in Jūrmala, 21.8% in Ventspils, cannot participate in local politics in the biggest municipalities.
Nadalje je njihov delež 39,8% v mestu Seda, 31,6% v občini Piedruja ter 31% v mestu Olaine in občini Dobele.
Moreover, their share is 39.8% in the town of Seda, 31.6% in the parish of Piedruja, 31% in the town of Olaine and the parish of Dobele.
Glede na to, da je na lokalnih volitvah leta 2005 povprečna volilna udeležba znašala 52,85%, to pomeni, da so znotraj nekaterih lokalnih oblasti zastopani interesi manj kot 40% prebivalcev.
Given that the average turnout was 52.85% of eligible persons in the 2005 local elections, in some local governments the interests of less than 40% of the residents are represented.