natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
prejem zaključnega poračuna najkasneje v šestih tednih po zamenjavi ponudnika;
to receive the final closure account at the latest six weeks after switching suppliers;
informiranost o energetskih virih, ki sestavljajo energetsko mešanico ponudnika;
to be informed about the contribution of the different energy sources to the electricity supplier's fuel mix;
dostop do neodvisnih mehanizmov za učinkovito obravnavo pritožb in izvensodnih poravnav;
to independent mechanisms for efficient treatment of complaints and out-of-court dispute settlements, such as an energy ombudsman or a consumer body;
nadomestilo, če storitev ne zadostuje meril za kvaliteto.
to compensation if service quality levels are not met (as with, for example, inaccurate and delayed billing);
Gre za pravico do oskrbe na njihovem območju z električno energijo določene kakovosti po razumnih, lahko in jasno primerljivih ter preglednih in nediskriminatornih cenah.
Those customers would then have the right to be supplied with electricity of a specified quality at reasonable, easily and clearly comparable, transparent and non-discriminatory prices.
Zaščita ranljivih potrošnikov
Protecting vulnerable consumers On the EP's initiative the new legislation includes special protection measures for vulnerable energy consumers.
Po mnenju Parlamenta bi morale države članice sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe, kot so nacionalni energetski akcijski načrti in prejemki iz sistemov socialne varnosti, da bi zagotovile potrebno oskrbo z električno energijo za ranljive odjemalce ali podporo za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti.
EU countries should take "appropriate measures” to address energy poverty such as National Energy Action Plans or benefits in social security systems to guarantee necessary energy supply to vulnerable customers or energy efficiency improvements, says the new text.
Sveženj energetske zakonodaje prinaša tudi naslednje elemente:
It requires Member States to co-operate in the event of "severe disruptions" of gas supply, by co-ordinating national emergency measures or developing and upgrading electricity and gas interconnections Further measures The two directives and three regulations of the third energy package also include, among other points:
ustanovitev evropske agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulativnih organov;
the creation of an EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators which will set out non-binding framework guidelines;
oblikovanje kodeksov omrežij, ki bodo temeljili na smernicah agencije;
tasking the Commission with the adoption of binding network codes - e.g. on procedures in emergency situations - based on the agency's guidelines;
ustanovitev evropske mreže operaterjev prenosnih sistemov za elektriko in evropske mreže operaterjev prenosnih sistemov za plin, ki bodo morali izvajati kodekse;
the establishment of European Networks of Transmission System Operators for electricity (ENTSOE) and gas (ENTSOG) which are to implement the network codes;
obveznost operaterjev prenosnih sistemov, da regulativnemu organu vsako leto predložijo desetletni načrt za razvoj omrežja;
the obligation on transmission system operators to submit every year a 10-year network development plan to the national regulatory authorities;
ukrepi za boljše regionalno sodelovanje med regulativnimi organi, še posebej ob resnih motnjah dobav zemeljskega plina;
measures to improve the regional cooperation between different national regulators;
večje pristojnosti in zagotovila za neodvisnost nacionalnih regulativnih organov.
measures to strengthen the independence of national regulators.
Zadovoljna sem, da smo dosegli sporazum o tem obsežnem in strokovno zahtevnem svežnju.
Directive 2003/54/EC) - 588 votes in favour, 81 against and 9 abstentions.
In upam, da bodo mehanizmi in določila, ki so v tem paketu, kot na primer večja neodvisnost nacionalnih regulatorjev, uspešni pri preseganju teh razlik in pri vzpostavljanju enotnega trga z elektriko in plinom."
Giles Chichester (EPP-ED, UK) Electricity and gas market: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators - 585 votes in favour, 29 against and 70 abstentions.
Lahko se zgodi, da bo podelitev razrešnice preložena, saj je pod vprašajem denar za administrativne zadeve Sveta EU, ki naj bi bil porabljen za operacije v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike.
Alejo Vidal-Quadras (EPP-ED, ES) Energy: internal market in electricity, cross-border exchanges, access to network (amend.
Evropski parlament mora vsako leto oceniti, kako je Evropska komisija upravljala s proračunskimi sredstvi EU.
Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003) - 589 votes in favour, 57 against and 38 abstentions.
Če Parlament ugotovi, da je potrebno preučiti resne nepravilnosti, odloži podajanje razrešnice.
Antonio Mussa (UEN, IT) - Energy: rules for the internal market in natural gas (repeal.
Komisija mora potem naglo ukrepati in najti ustrezno rešitev.
Directive 2003/55/EC) - 596 votes in favour, 45 against and 45 abstentions.
85 odstotkov izdatkov za kmetijstvo upravljajo države članice, zato Parlament zahteva, da naj bi člani vlad prav tako odobrili te proračune.
Atanas Paparizov (PES, BG) Energy: internal market in natural gas, access to the transmission networks (repeal.
Prenos torkove razprave v Parlamentu v Strasbourgu lahko spremljate na naši spletni strani (spodnja povezava).
Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005) - 594 votes in favour, 24 against and 65 abstentions.
Prenos razprave v živo iz EP Dnevni red plenarnega zasedanja Sporočilo za javnost Odbor za proračunski nadzor
Background note
-//EP//TEXT COMPARL PE-400.700 01 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080603BRI30699 ITEM-004-EN NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080513STO28753 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080616IPR31781 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A6-2008-0226 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080228IPR22475 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A6-2009-0216 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080528IPR30246 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A6-2009-0235 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080513STO28753 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A6-2009-0213 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080429STO27886 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A6-2009-0238 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A6-2008-0226 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20090421IPR54056 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080708IPR33699 0 NOT XML V0//EN
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20090316IPR51917 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20090415BKG53730 0 NOT XML V0//EN
Različna stališča v razpravi o direktivi o vračanju
Return Directive debate: political groups hold different positions ahead of vote
Evropski parlament je v torek razpravljal o besedilu predloga direktive o vračanju nezakonitih priseljencev, ki je kompromisni dogovor med poročevalcem Manfredom WEBROM (EPP-ED, DE) in Svetom EU.
MEPs debated the text on the Return directive as negotiated between the EP rapporteur Manfred WEBER (EPP-ED, DE) and the Council in Strasbourg.
Politične skupine, ki podpirajo kompromis, poudarjajo, da je treba oblikovati skupno politiko priseljevanja, nasprotniki pa trdijo, da je Parlament preveč popustil zahtevam Sveta.
The groups in favour of the text stress the importance of moving forward with a European policy on migratory flows, while those opposing it underline that the rapporteur has given too much to the Council and the Parliament must amend the text.
Glasovanje o besedilu bo v sredo ob 11:30.
The vote on the legislative text takes place on Wednesday at 11.30 am.
Poudaril je, da gre za poenotenje standardov, medtem ko sedaj vsaka članica lahko deluje po svoji zakonodaji, pri pogajanjih pa je bil najtrši oreh nudenje pravne pomoči osebam.
The debate was opened by Slovenian Interior Minister Dragutin MATE , speaking for the Council Presidency-in-Office, who highlighted the fact that the return directive was the first EP-Council legislative act on migration.
Minister je še izrazil zadovoljstvo s kompromisom, ki bo izboljšal razmere, v katerih živijo migranti, še posebej ranljive skupine, kot so družine in otroci.
One of the problematic areas in the negotiations in Council had been the maximum period of detention, but the six month period laid down in the directive would now apply in all Member States.
Opozoril je, da bi zavrnitev direktive pomenila, da "ne bomo imeli skupnih norm, ne bomo izboljšali stanja, ki si ga želimo vsi izboljšati, in proces sprejemanja te direktive se bo bistveno podaljšal in zavlekel.
However, the biggest difficulty had been legal aid, particularly as the Member States had differing experiences, depending on whether they were near to or far from migratory flows.
Če smo zelo optimistični, lahko vemo, da najmanj naslednja tri leta ne bomo uspeli uskladiti direktive o vračanju".
The minister also stressed that the directive protected vulnerable groups such as children.
Posledica bi bil tudi zastoj pri ostalih direktivah s tega področja: o zeleni karti in o nekaterih drugih pravicah delavcev, ki pridejo v Evropsko unijo.
On all these points he argued that the compromise embodied in the directive "represents progress" and he urged the EP to approve the text.
Nova direktiva je v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah, saj daje prednost prostovoljnemu vračanju in nudi večjo zaščito otrokom ter družinam.
He emphasised that "the directive is in line with the European Convention on Human Rights", it "gives priority to voluntary returns" and "it protects the rights of children and families".
Poslanec Mafred WEBER je direktivo označil kot kompleksno, vendar pa je odbor za državljanske svoboščine z veliko večino podprl kompromis.
Parliament's rapporteur, Manfred WEBER (EPP-ED, DE), stressed that this was "a complex topic" but that in the Civil Liberties Committee a large majority had come out in favour of the compromise.
Zakonodaja se ne tiče pravice do azila, ampak priseljevanja, ob čemer nudi zaščito otrokom in mladoletnikom brez spremstva ter omogoča dostop do zdravstvenega varstva in izobraževanja.
He stressed that the directive dealt not with asylum but with immigration and he challenged some of the legislation's critics, since he saw it as a way to ensure that "slavery in the EU comes to an end".
Direktiva tudi upošteva smernice Sveta Evrope in je korak k močnejši, bolj humanitarni Uniji.
In conclusion, Mr Weber said that what he wanted to see was "a strong, humanitarian Europe".
Martine ROURE (PES, FR) je napovedala, da njena skupina socialdemokratov ne bo podprla predloga, ker ne zagotavlja zadostne zaščite temeljnih pravic.
Martine ROURE (PES, FR) said that her Group would not accept the compromise put forward, not because Socialists are against a returns policy, but because the compromise does not provide adequate protection of fundamental rights.
Poudarila je, da direktiva ne omogoča legalizacije nezakonitega statusa, pa tudi pravice, ki jih navaja, niso zavezujoče, zato ne pomeni napredka.
The rights established in the directive are not binding, she said, and would not allow for an improvement in detention in EU.
Jeanine HENNIS - PLASSCHAERT (ALDE, FR) je dejala, da direktiva predstavlja kompromisni paket, ki s pravili omogoča, da se je ne bo zlorabljalo za zmanjševanje obstoječih standardov.
Jeanine HENNIS-PLASSCHAERT (ALDE, NL), argued that the compromise package made it clear that Member States should maintain more favourable standards if they already have them.
"Tri leta razprave so pokazala, da nimamo več manevrskega prostora in da je to najboljši kompromis.
Indeed, she said, the Council agreed to a political statement in the agreement on the directive stressing that the directive cannot be used to lower standards.
Ni popolna, a je prvi korak v pravo smer.
"Do we want a directive or not?" she asked.
Vprašati se moramo, ali je ne želimo zato, ker smo s sedanjim stanjem zadovoljni."
"Many Member States would be happy if this directive died through lack of agreement, so the irony is that if we don't agree this compromise package, we would be supporting those Member States" At present no EU legislation exists - with this package we would have infringement procedures, Commission report, European Parliament monitoring.
Jean LAMBERT (Zeleni/EFA, UK): "Storili bomo vse, kar je mogoče, da se te ljudi obravnava kot posameznike.
Jean LAMBERT (Greens/EFA, GB) said that her group could not accept the negotiated text.
Videli smo, da so v državah članicah težave tudi, ko gre za lastne državljane.
The text simply does not meet the standards that were set out at the beginning, she said.
Načeloma nismo proti, vendar pa ta direktiva ne spoštuje standardov, ki smo si jih zastavili in le ohranja težave, s katerimi se borimo v državah članicah.
On the length of detention, Ms Lambert was concerned about what long periods of detention can do to the mental health of the people detained.
Ena teh težav je omejitev prostosti.
Family life is put at risk.
Andrzej Tomasz ZAPAŁOWSKI (UEN, PL): "Problem se je možno zaostril v državah članicah.
Andrzej Tomasz ZAPAŁOWSKI (UEN, PL), argued that, before we speak about legal protection for families from outside the EU, we should be hearing something about saving our own culture on families, which has been a model for the rest of the world..
Govorili naj bi o pravnih predpisih za ljudi, ki prihajajo iz tretjih držav.
Giusto CATANIA (GUE/NGL, IT) said that "the directive is a disgrace, an insult which aims at ruling out thousands of years of welcoming people, of openness in Europe It seeks to limit free circulation.
Govorimo o tem, da je treba ohraniti družinsko, krščansko tradicijo v Evropi.
We are talking about 18 months not 6 months detention without having committed any crime.
Le nekaj let še moramo počakati in tudi v tej dvorani bomo slišali pozive, da moramo ohraniti našo kulturo."
Detained in degrading and humiliating conditions as the Committee has seen in various detention centres.
Giusto CATANIA (GUE/NGL, IT): "Direktiva je prava sramota, žalitev za pravno naravo Evrope.
This directive is being forced upon us by Governments.
Tisoči let civilnega sobivanja bodo s tem uničeni.
We are being dictated to by the Council "Accept it or go away" It is not co-decision.
Evropa se želi zaščititi, omejiti gibanje oseb.
Amnesty International, Council of Europe .. all saying do not approve it.
Hélène GOUDIN (IND/DEM, SE): "Ko so zaprta vsa druga vrata, poskušajo ljudje vstopiti skozi zadnja.
Hélène GOUDIN (IND/DEM, SE) said that "If all doors are closed people may well try getting in through the back door.
In to se dogaja.
The EU is becoming a Fortress Europe.
Številne organizacije za človekove pravice so kritizirale to direktivo, Karitas in Amnesty International na primer.
Many human rights organisations have criticised this directive: Caritas and Amnesty International for example.
Gre za kršitev človekovih pravic in ne za Evropsko dodano vrednost.
There is no European Added Value in creating this inhuman and expensive situation.
Ne moremo ljudi, ki niso storili ničesar, pridržati za 18 mesecev.
Human rights organisations have warned us.
Gre za drago rešitev in zapleten problem."
We need an international effort for Human Rights."
Direktiva daje dve možnosti - legalizacijo statusa ali izgon.
Directive offers choice between deportation or legalisation.
Želel bi si pravo direktivo o vračanju, ki bi vendarle končala magnetno privlačnost EU."
Concluding, he said "tomorrow's vote is not on whether this directive is ideal, but on whether it represents progress for the EU.
-//EP//TEXT REPORT A6-2007-0339 0 NOT XML V0//SL
-//EP//TEXT IM-PRESS 20080609BKG31068 0 NOT XML V0//EN
Vstop Slovaške v evroobmočje
Parliament backs Slovakia’s euro area membership
Poslanci so v torek v postopku posvetovanja s 579 glasovi za, 17 proti in 86 vzdržanimi glasovi potrdili predlog o vstopu Slovaške v območje evra s 1. januarjem 2009.
MEPs have approved Slovakia's bid to adopt the euro on 1 January 2009.
Država mora sicer nadaljevati strukturne reforme na ekonomskem področju in si prizadevati za ohranjanje nizke stopnje inflacije.
At the same time, they stressed that Slovakia should make further efforts to keep its rate of inflation down and continue structural reforms to its economy.
Poročilo, ki ga je pripravil David CASA (EPP-ED, MT) , se strinja z mnenjem Komisije, da Slovaška izpolnjuje pogoje za vstop v območje evra.
In a report drawn up by David Casa (EPP-ED, MT), Parliament agrees with the Commission that Slovakia has met the criteria to join the euro.
Parlament ugotavlja, da je Evropska centralna banka v svojem poročilu za leto 2008 zaznala tveganja glede trajnosti dosežene nizke stopnje inflacije.
Ongoing efforts urged on inflation and structural reform
Obveščanje javnosti
Informing the public
V te namene bi bilo treba oblikovati opazovalno službo, ki bi tedensko spremljala cene izbranega števila osnovnih potrebščin in s tem obvladovala napačne zaznave o povišanju cen.
An observatory should be set up to monitor the prices of a selection of basic goods so as to fight false perceptions about price increases.
Spremljanje po objavi poročil
Changes after the assessment
Poslanci poudarjajo, da mora Svet po objavi konvergenčnih poročil Komisije in Evropske centralne banke ter na podlagi ustrezne resolucije Parlamenta upoštevati vse ustrezne ukrepe, ki jih je država članica sprejela v zvezi s prošnjo za članstvo v evroobmočju in jih vključiti v postopek spremljanja.
MEPs stress that all relevant measures taken by a Member State applying for membership of the euro area, after the publication of the convergence reports of the Commission and the ECB, should be taken into account by the Council on the basis of the relevant Parliament resolution and integrated into the monitoring process.
Naslednje poteze
Next steps
Parlament ima sicer glede širitve evroobmočja le posvetovalno vlogo, vendar pa Svet EU ne more sprejeti svoje odločitve, dokler poslanci ne potrdijo resolucije o predlogu za širitev.
The European Council is expected to take a political decision on Slovakia's euro membership at its 19-20 June summit, with the formal legislation being put to the vote at the following meeting of EU finance ministers.
Nova evropska zakonodaja o ravnanju z odpadki
MEPs give green light for new EU waste legislation with binding 2020 targets
Evropa naj do leta 2020 sprejme ukrepe za "družbo recikliranja" Evropski parlament je v drugem branju postopka soodločanja potrdil predlog direktive o recikliranju in preprečevanju nastajanja odpadkov ter uveljavitvi splošnega pravila o petstopenjski hierarhiji odpadkov.
MEPs give green light for new EU waste legislation with binding 2020 targets The EU will have new waste legislation which includes targets for re-use and recycling of waste to be attained by 2020 after MEPs adopted amendments.
Nova direktiva bo poenostavila obstoječo zakonodajo in zajela tudi direktivi o odstranjevanju odpadnih olj ter prednostno nevarnih snovi.
The directive sets out rules on recycling and requires Member States to draw up binding national programmes for waste prevention.
Direktiva določa pravila recikliranja in programov za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov, obveze držav, hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki ter uveljavlja načelo onesnaževalec plača.
Waste prevention targets will be considered by the Commission in the future.
Komisija naj bi v prihodnosti pripravila ciljne vrednosti za zmanjševanje količine odpadkov, direktiva pa med drugim opredeljuje sežiganje odpadkov kot ponovno uporabo (ne pa odstranjevanje) odpadkov, če so ob tem izpolnjena določena merila glede energetske učinkovitosti.
Incineration of waste will be categorised as a recovery operation rather than disposal, provided it meets a certain energy efficiency standard.
Poročilo o predlogu je pripravila poslanka Caroline JACKSON (EPP-ED, UK) , ki je poudarila, da je do odločitve prišlo po dolgem usklajevanju in tudi opredelitvah pojmov, kot je pridobivanje energije iz odpadkov.
The second-reading agreement with Council adopted by MEPs sets the definitions and ground rules for all the other pieces of EU legislation relative to waste - it therefore has a direct or indirect impact on them all.
Hkrati pa sta v zakonodajnem besedilu po zaslugi Parlamenta večjo vlogo dobila recikliranje in hierarhija ravnanja z odpadki.
In the debate on Monday 16 June, Parliament's rapporteur Caroline JACKSON (EPP-ED, South West, Conservative UK) said: "It has been a long and tortuous road to this second reading.
Direktiva bo tudi temelj za vso ostalo specifično evropsko zakonodajo o odpadkih.
There was much resistance to what we wanted to do and the Council drove a very hard bargain...
Vzpostavitev "družbe recikliranja"
That is the best deal available.
V Evropi vsako leto nastane dve milijardi ton odpadkov, kar predstavlja 3 tone in pol na osebo.
Anyone who thinks that we could get anything better by going to conciliation would be deceiving themselves."
Reciklira se manj kot tretjina odpadkov, v nekaterih državah konča na odlagališčih kar 90 odstotkov vseh odpadkov, medtem ko drugje ta delež znaša le desetino.
The compromise was supported by many speakers during yesterday's debate though several speakers would have liked to achieve more.
Leta 2005 je na odlagališčih končalo 49 odstotkov komunalnih odpadkov, 18 odstotkov jih je bilo sežganih, 27 odstotkov odpadkov pa se je recikliralo ali kompostiralo.
Several MEPs were unhappy that the compromise was too weak and criticised that no binding waste prevention target is included or would have preferred to have even tougher targets for recycling and re-use.
Zato bi morali do leta 2020 sprejeti ukrepe, ki bi stremeli k cilju oblikovanja "družbe recikliranja":
The compromise states that Member states "shall take the necessary measures designed to achieve the following targets":
- povečati količino (po teži) gospodinjskih in drugih podobnih odpadkov (papir, kovine, steklo) za ponovno uporabo ter recikliranje za najmanj 50 odstotkov ;
- by 2020 for re-use and recycling of waste materials such as paper, metal glass from households and similar waste streams: 50 %
Parlament ugotavlja, da hierarhija ravnanja z odpadki ne predstavlja najboljše rešitve znotraj zakonodaje o odpadkih, vendar pa je prednostni seznam podlaga za določanje okoljsko najugodnejših rešitev.
A special target for manufacturing and industrial waste, as demanded by MEPs is not included in the compromise but the Commission has to examine the targets by 2020 and eventually reinforce them or consider setting targets for other waste streams.
Odstopanja od hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki ne bi smela biti poljubna, pač pa potekati v skladu z urejenim postopkom.
Waste prevention is reinforced - targets to be considered in the future
priprava za ponovno uporabo;
Further to this duty the compromise includes a new article on waste prevention.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti ukrepe, ki zagotavljajo najboljši izid za okolje, pri čemer je pri posameznih vrstah odpadkov možno odstopanje od hierarhije.
Members were divided over whether incineration of municipal solid waste should be regarded as a "disposal" or a "recovery" operation, the latter one being a better option regarding the waste hierarchy.
Zagotovljeni morata biti celovitost in preglednost procesa ob upoštevati nacionalnih pravil glede posvetovanja in sodelovanja državljanov ter zainteresiranih strani.
In the vote, MEPs backed the Commission and Council position that it should be categorised as recovery, provided it meets a certain energy efficiency standards (energy efficiency formula in annex II to the directive).
Države naj bi pripravile ustrezne načrte za upravljanje s smetmi in v petih letih po sprejetju direktive uvedle programe za preprečevanje njihovega nastajanja.
In the debate, Mrs Jackson said: "This is a positive incentive to incinerator operators to reach high standards and we would do well to remember, in these fuel poor days, that waste can be a useful fuel.
Komisija bi morala hkrati izdelati sistem za izmenjavo informacij o najboljših praksah na področju preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov in oblikovati smernice v pomoč državam pri pripravi programov.
But it is important to recognise that the Parliament has now ensured, by writing in targets for recycling and emphasising waste prevention objectives, that incineration of residual waste will have to go hand in hand with recycling."
Slovenska poslanka v razpravi
Member States to stick to binding five-stage hierarchy