natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is paid to one of the parents on the basis of the expert opinion of a medical board. 
Izplačuje se v denarni obliki enemu izmed staršev, na podlagi mnenja zdravniške komisije.
The basic amount of the monthly allowance was determined in 2002 at SIT 18,000 and the augmented amount at SIT 36,000. 
Osnovna višina tega mesečnega dodatka je bila določena v letu 2002 v vrednosti 18 000 SIT, povečana višina pa 36 000 SIT.
Partial payment for lost income is remuneration received by one of the parents breaking the labour relation or starting to work part time because of nursing or caring for a severely physically or mentally handicapped child. 
Delno plačilo za izgubljeni dohodek je osebni prejemek, ki ga prejme eden od staršev, kadar prekine delovno razmerje ali prične delati s krajšim delovnim časom zaradi nege in varstva otroka s težko motnjo v duševnem razvoju ali težko gibalno oviranega otroka.
Parents' right to shorter working time due the parenthood is parent's right to part-time work due to parenthood. 
Prispevki zaradi dela s krajšim delovnim časom je pravica staršev do krajšega delovnega časa zaradi starševstva.
The total annual amount paid for this purpose was SIT 1,178 million, which is 44.2% more than in 2002. 
Za ta program je bilo porabljenih 1 178 mio SIT ali za 44,2 % več kot v letu 2002.
The total amount paid for this purpose was SIT 1,306 million. 
Za ta program je bilo izplačanih 1 306 mio SIT.
Entitled to receive lnger leave for nursing a child were 12.6% of beneficiaries because they were parents of twins, triplets, etc., or prematurely born children, because they were already nursing several children or because of illness. 
Daljši dopust za nego in varstvo otroka je pripadal 12,6 % upravičencem, in to zaradi rojstva več otrok ali rojstva nedonošenčkov, zaradi varovanja že več otrok ter zaradi bolezni.
In 2004, 24,419 beneficiaries were receiving large family allowance. 
Dodatek za veliko družino je v letu 2004 prejemalo 24 419 upra- vičencev.
The total amount paid for this purpose was SIT 1,915 million. 
Za ta program je bilo izplačanih 1 915 mio SIT.
Sources and methods of data collection Data on expenditure and receipts of social protection schemes are the result of data collection regarding the Core system of ESSPROS methodology requests. 
Viri in metode zbiranja podatkov Podatki o izdatkih in virih financiranja programov socialne zaščite so rezultat zbiranja podatkov glede na zahteve osnovnega sistema metodologije ESSPROS.
The data are acquired from official records and from published data. 
Pridobili smo jih od nosilcev uradnih evidenc in iz objavljenih podatkov.
We prepared most data on cash benefits from individual data formed in the way that they covered all payments for a particular year. 
Pri denarnih socialnih prejemkih smo večino podatkov pripravili iz individualnih podatkov; ti so bili oblikovani tako, da so zajemali vsa izplačila za posamezno leto.
The value of funds for co-financing centres for social work and funds for pre-school education is estimated. 
Vrednost sredstev za sofinanciranje delovanja centrov za socialno delo in za predšolsko vzgojo je ocenjena.
The data on social benefits financed by employers are crude estimates gathered from the Labour Cost Survey. 
Podatki o socialnih prejemkih, ki jih financirajo delodajalci, so grobe ocene, izdelane na podlagi rezultatov ankete o stroških dela.
Coverage Statistical coverage is almost complete. 
Zajetje Statistično zajetje je blizu popolnosti.
The data on social benefits financed by municipalities are incomplete. 
Pomanjkljivi so podatki, ki se nanašajo na socialne prejemke, ki jih financirajo občine.
The data on rent supplements (which can be paid to recipients of social welfare benefits) and social assistance benefits specific for municipalities are not covered. 
Tako nismo zajeli dodatka za najemnino (ki se lahko izplačuje prejemnikom socialnovarstvenih dajatev) in pomoči socialnega varstva, specifičnih za občine.
The coverage for the housing function is incomplete. 
Pri zajemu podatkov so pomanjkljivi podatki za področje nastanitev.
Because dwellings with non-commercial rents are unselective by social criteria, those benefits are not observed. 
Zaradi izrazite neselektivnosti dodeljenih stanovanj z neprofitno najemnino po socialnem merilu tudi teh razlik nismo vključili v opazovanje.
Social assistance benefits financed by the private sector are also not included. 
Prav tako nismo zajeli socialnega varstva, ki se financira z zasebnimi sredstvi.
The structure is shown in Chart 3. 
Struktura je prikazana na sliki 3.
If we compare social protection expenditure by function for Slovenia and the average for EU Member States, we can see that the difference is not big. 
Če primerjamo izdatke za socialne prejemke po področjih za Slovenijo in povprečje držav EU, razlike niso velike.
Sources and methods of data collection Data on expenditure and receipts of social protection schemes are the result of data collection regarding the Core system of ESSPROS methodology requests. 
Viri in metode zbiranja podatkov Podatki o izdatkih in finančnih virih za programe socialne zaščite so so bili zbrani v skladu z zahtevami osnovnega sistema metodologije ESSPROS.
Certain categories of social benefits refer to benefit for persons under and above certain age. 
Določene kategorije socialnih prejemkov se nanašajo na prejemke, namenjene osebam pod in nad določeno starostjo.
In all schemes the age limit for men is 65 and for women 60 years. 
V vseh programih je starostna meja za moške 65 let, za ženske pa 60 let.
• Social exclusion not elsewhere classified - benefits intended to poor people and other socially excluded groups to combat social exclusion where they don't belong to other functions. 
Vrednost vseh finančnih virov za posamezni program socialne zaščite je vsota vseh vrst finančnih virov za ta program.
Some financial flows refer to operation with other social protection schemes. 
Finančne operacije potekajo tudi med programi socialne zaščite.
In expenditure and receipts totals these flows are not considered. 
Pri seštevkih izdatkov in prejemkov vseh programov te operacije niso upoštevane.
International comparison In 2002 EU Member States earmarked on average 28.0% of GDP for social protection, while Slovenia earmarked 25.4 %. 
Mednarodna primerjava Države EU so v letu 2002 namenile za socialno zaščito povprečno 28,0 % BDP, Slovenija pa 25,4 %.
In most EU Member States these shares have been decreasing recently, except in Greece, Italy and Portugal. 
Za večino držav članic EU pa velja, da se ti deleži v zadnjih letih znižujejo (razen v Grčiji, Italiji in na Portugalskem).
Social protection expenditure among countries can be compared by showing the data in a common currency. 
Izdatke, ki jih za socialno zaščito, namenjajo posamezne države, lahko primerjamo tako, da jih prikažemo v skupni valuti.
In 2002, EUR 2,998 per capita were earmarked for social protection in Slovenia, which is 44.5% of the average per capita amount earmarked for social protection in EU Member States (ECU 6,748). 
V letu 2002 smo v Sloveniji za socialno zaščito na prebivalca namenili 2 998 evrov ali 44,5 % vrednosti, ki so jo za socialno zaščito na prebivalca v tem letu v povprečju namenile države EU (6 748 evrov).
For direct comparison among countries, we compare social protection expenditure in purchasing power parity (PPP) per capita. 
Če želimo primerjati izdatke za socialno zaščito med državami neposredno, jih primerjamo v paritetah kupne moči (PKM) na prebivalca.
In 2002, PPP 4,253 per capita were earmarked for social protection in Slovenia, which is 63.1% of the average per capita amount earmarked for social protection in EU Member States (in 1996 the percent was 60.5%). 
V Sloveniji smo za leto 2002 za socialno zaščito namenili 4 253 PKM-jev na prebivalca ali 63,1 % vrednosti, ki so jo za socialno zaščito na prebivalca v povprečju namenile države EU (v letu 1996 smo v Sloveniji namenili 60,5 % te vrednosti).
Chart 4 shows amounts of social protection expenditure in PPP per capita for all EU Member States and for Slovenia. 
Slika 4 prikazuje vrednosti izdatkov za socialno zaščito v PKM na prebivalca za vse države članice EU in za Slovenijo.
We can see that of all EU Member States only Greece earmarks less funds for social protection in PPP per capita than Slovenia. 
Opazimo lahko, da je med državami članicami EU namenila za socialno zaščito v PKM na prebivalca manj kot Slovenija le še Grčija.
If we compare social protection expenditure by function for Slovenia and the average for EU Member States, we can see that the difference is not big. 
Če primerjamo izdatke za socialne prejemke po področjih za Slovenijo s povprečjem držav članic EU, opazimo, da razlike niso velike.
Chart 5 shows that - in terms of collected data on the share of GDP - Slovenia earmarks slightly more for sickness/health care (0.3 percentage point) and old age (0.1 percentage point) functions and slightly less for survivors (0.8 percentage point) and unemployment (1.0 percentage point) functions. 
Iz slike 5 lahko razberemo, da (po zbranih podatkih) glede na delež BDP namenjamo v Sloveniji nekaj več izdatkov za področji bolezen/zdravstveno varstvo (0,3 odstotne točke) in starost (0,1 odstotne točke), nekaj manj pa za področji smrt hranitelja družine (0,8 odstotne točke) in brezposelnost (1,0 odstotne točke).
Let us take a look at social protection receipts. 
Poglejmo še finančne vire za programe socialne zaščite.
Both in Slovenia and in EU Member States the main sources of financing are social contributions. 
Tako kot v Sloveniji so tudi za povprečje držav EU glavni finančni viri socialni prispevki.
The share of employers' contributions has been gradually decreasing. 
Delež prispevkov države postopoma narašča, delež prispevkov delodajalcev pa postopoma upada.
Chart 6 shows that in Slovenia the share of employers' contributions is a lot lower and that the share of social contributions of protected persons is a lot higher. 
Na sliki 6 lahko opazimo, da je v Sloveniji precej nižji od povprečja držav članic EU delež prispevkov delodajalcev, precej višji pa delež socialnih prispevkov zavarovanih oseb.
Purpose of the statistical survey The purpose of statistical surveys of public social welfare institutions is to collect basic data on people in care living in these institutions; i.e. on their number, age and health, on sources of their income, on reasons for their admission, on mode of payment for care and some other data. 
Namen statističnih raziskovanja Namen statističnih raziskovanj, s katerimi spremljamo javne socialno- varstvene zavode, je zbrati osnovne podatke o oskrbovancih, ki živijo v teh ustanovah: o številu oskrbovancev, starosti in zdravstvenem stanju le-teh, o virih njihovih dohodkov, o razlogih, zaradi katerih so bili sprejeti v ustanovo, o načinu plačevanja oskrbnine in še nekatere druge podatke.
Institutions also report on their capacity and personnel. 
Zavodi pa sporočaji tudi podatke o svojih zmogljivostih in o zaposlenemosebju.
Data source Data are mediated by old people's homes, special social welfare institutions, and centres for protection and training. 
Vir podatkov Podatke nam posredujejo domovi za starejše, posebni socialnovarstveni zavodi ter varstveno-delovni centri iz lastnih evidenc.
Coverage The coverage is complete. 
Zajetje Zajetje je popolno.
Definitions and explanations Old people's homes provide institutional care for the aged, with which they substitute or supplement the functions of home or own family (organised nutrition and care, and health care). 
Definicije in pojasnila Domovi za starejše opravljajo institucionalno varstvo starejših in s tem nadomeščajo ali dopolnjujejo funkcije doma ali lastne družine (organizirana prehrana in varstvo ter zdravstveno varstvo).
Special social welfare institutions provide special forms of institutional care for mentally and physically handicapped adults. 
Posebni socialnovarstveni zavodi opravljajo posebne oblike institucionalnega varstva za odrasle duševno in telesno prizadete osebe.
Centres for protection and training provide special training and care for as well as employment of mentally and physically handicapped adults. 
Varstveno-delovni centri opravljajo naloge vodenja in varstva ter vodijo organizirano zaposlitev v posebnih razmerah za duševno in telesno prizadete odrasle osebe.
Publishing Annual: - Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Slovenia - Rapid Reports. 
Objavljanje Letno: - Statistični letopis Republike Slovenije - Statistične informacije.
There were 13,498 people in care in old people's homes, of those 73.0% women. 
V domovih za starejše je bivalo 13 498 oskrbovancev, med njimi 73,0 % žensk.
The second most important reason for admission was major mental and physical illness (26.6%). 
Drugi najpogostejši razlog za sprejem v dom so bila hujša telesna in duševna obolenja (26,6 %).
There were 6,075 persons in paid employment in old people's homes (of those 90.5% women) - 55.7% for health care services and 44.3% for social welfare services. 
Vseh zaposlenih v teh domovih je bilo skupaj 6 075 (med njimi 90,5 % žensk), in sicer za storitve zdravstvenega varstva 55,7 %, za storitve socialnega varstva pa 44,3 %.
On average there were 2.2 people in care per one person in paid employment in old people's homes. 
Povprečno razmerje med številom oskrbovancev in zaposlenih je bilo 2,2 oskrbovanca na zaposlenega.
The average old people's home took care of 221 persons. 
V povprečju je bilo v enem domu v oskrbi 221 oskrbovancev.
Purpose of the statistical survey The purpose of statistical surveys on public social welfare institutions is to collect basic data on people in care living in these institutions; i.e. on their number, age and health, on sources of their income, on reasons for their admission, on the mode of payment for care and some other data. 
Namen statističnih raziskovanja Namen statističnih raziskovanj, s katerimi spremljamo javne socialnovarstvene zavode, je zbrati osnovne podatke o oskrbovancih, ki živijo v teh ustanovah: o številu oskrbovancev, starosti in zdravstvenem stanju le-teh, o virih njihovih dohodkov, o razlogih, zaradi katerih so bili sprejeti v ustanovo, o načinu plačevanja oskrbnine in še nekatere druge podatke.
Institutions also report on their capacity and personnel. 
Zavodi pa sporočajo tudi podatke o svojih zmogljivostih in o zaposlenem osebju.
Data source Data are transmitted by old people's homes, special social welfare institutions, and centres for protection and training. 
Vir podatkov Podatke nam posredujejo domovi za starejše, posebni socialnovarstveni zavodi ter varstveno-delovni centri iz lastnih evidenc.
Definitions and explanations Old people's homes provide institutional care for the aged, with which they substitute or supplement the functions of a home or one's own family (organised nutrition and care, and health care). 
Definicije in pojasnila Domovi za starejše opravljajo institucionalno varstvo starejših in s tem nadomeščajo ali dopolnjujejo funkcije doma ali lastne družine (organizirana prehrana in varstvo ter zdravstveno varstvo).
Special social welfare institutions provide special forms of institutional care for mentally and physically handicapped adults. 
Posebni socialnovarstveni zavodi opravljajo posebne oblike institucio- nalnega varstva za odrasle duševno in telesno prizadete osebe.
There were 13,098 people in care in old people's homes, of those 74.1% women. 
V domovih za starejše je bivalo 13 098 oskrbovancev, med njimi 74,1 % žensk.
The second most important reason for admission was a major mental and physical illness (20.5%). 
Drugi najpogostejši razlog za sprejem v dom so bila hujša telesna in duševna obolenja (20,5 %).
There were 5,930 persons in paid employment in old people's homes (of those 90.9% women), namely 52.0% for health care services and 38.9% for social welfare services. 
Vseh zaposlenih v teh domovih je bilo skupaj 5 930 (med njimi 90,9 % žensk), in sicer za storitve zdravstvenega varstva 52,0 %, za storitve socialnega varstva pa 38,9 %.
On average an old people's home took care of 208 persons. 
V povprečju je bilo v enem domu v oskrbi 208 oskrbovancev.
Data for 2004 cover people in care in eight units for special forms of care for adults within old people's homes together with people in care in seven special social welfare institutions for mentally and physically handicapped adults. 
V prikazu podatkov za leto 2004 smo k oskrbovancem sedmih posebnih socialnovarstvenih zavodov za odrasle duševno in telesno prizadete osebe začeli šteti še oskrbovance osmih enot za posebne oblike varstva odraslih duševno in telesno prizadetih oseb, ki delujejo kot posebne enote znotraj domov za starejše ali kot njihove dislocirane enote.
Because of this change the number of these people in care increased in 2004. 
Zaradi te spremembe se je število tovrstnih oskrbovancev v letu 2004 povečalo.
In 2004, these institutions were taking care of 2,746 people, just over a half of them were women. 
V letu 2004 je bivalo v teh ustanovah 2 746 oskrbovancev, od tega nekaj več kot polovico žensk.
Most protégés were under 45 years old (87.1%). 
Večina varovancev je bila starih do 45 let (87,1 %).
Most of them had moderate mental problems (64.5%). 
Največ jih je imelo zmerno motnjo v duševnem razvoju (64,5 %).
More than two thirds of protégés were in day care. 
V dnevnem varstvu sta bili več kot dve tretjini varovancev.
Protégés mostly live at home with parents (66.7%) and are being driven to centres for protection and training. 
Te osebe stanujejo večinoma doma s starši (66,7 %) in ti jih v varstvo vozijo.
There were 898 persons in paid employment in centres for protection and training; most of them in the programme paid for by the social welfare (80.5%). 
V obravnavanih centrih je bilo zaposlenih 898 delavcev, največ v programu, ki ga plačuje socialno varstvo, in sicer 80,5 %.
Data source Data are transmitted by old people's homes, special social welfare institutions, and centres for protection and training. 
Vir podatkov Podatke nam posredujejo domovi za starejše, posebni socialnovarstveni zavodi ter varstveno-delovni centri, in sicer iz svojih evidenc.
Public Social Welfare Institutions - Slovenia in Figures COMMENT In 2005 there were 68 old people's homes, 6 special social welfare institutions, 8 units for special forms of care for adults within old people's homes, 34 independent centres for protection and training, 23 units of such centres within other institutions and 21 licensed centres for protection and training. 
Javni socialnovarstveni zavodi - Slovenija v številkah KOMENTAR V letu 2005 je bilo v Sloveniji 68 domov za starejše, 6 posebnih socialnovarstvenih zavodov, 8 enot za posebne oblike varstva odraslih, znotraj domov za starejše oz. njihovih dislociranih enot, 34 samostojnih varstveno-delovnih centrov, 23 enot varstveno-delovnih centrov v sestavi drugih zavodov ter 21 varstveno-delovnih centrov s koncesijo.
There were 13,641 people in care in old people's homes, of those 74.1% women. 
V domovih za starejše je bivalo 13 641 oskrbovancev, med njimi 74,1 % žensk.
The second most important reason for admission was a major mental and physical illness (22.2%). 
Drugi najpogostejši razlog za sprejem v dom so bila hujša telesna in duševna obolenja (22,2 %).
There were 6,258 persons in paid employment in old people's homes (of those 90.6% women), namely 54.3% for health care services and 45.7% for social welfare services. 
Vseh zaposlenih v teh domovih je bilo skupaj 6 258 (med njimi 90,6 % žensk), in sicer za storitve zdravstvenega varstva 54,3 %, za storitve socialnega varstva pa 45,7 %.
On average an old people's home took care of 200 persons. 
V povprečju je bilo v enem domu v oskrbi 200 oskrbovancev.
Data for 2004 and 2005 cover people in care for special forms of care for mentally and physically handicapped adults within old people's homes together with people in care in special social welfare institutions for mentally and physically handicapped adults. 
V prikazu podatkov za leto 2004 in 2005 smo k oskrbovancem posebnih socialnovarstvenih zavodov za odrasle duševno in telesno prizadete osebe začeli šteti še oskrbovance za posebne oblike varstva odraslih duševno in telesno prizadetih oseb, ki delujejo kot posebne enote znotraj domov za starejše ali kot njihove dislocirane enote.
Because of this change the number of these people in care increased in 2004 and 2005. 
Zaradi te spremembe se je število takih oskrbovancev v letu 2004 in v letu 2005 povečalo.
In 2005, these institutions were taking care of 2,674 people, just over a half of them were women. 
V letu 2005 je bivalo v teh ustanovah 2 674 oskrbovancev, od tega malo več kot polovico žensk.
Most protégés were under 45 years old (85.9%). 
Večinoma so bili stari do 45 let (85,9 %).
Most of them had moderate mental problems (62.2%). 
Največ jih je imelo zmerno motnjo v duševnem razvoju (62,2 %).
Protégés mostly live at home with parents (65.3%) and are being driven to centres for protection and training. 
Te osebe stanujejo večinoma doma s starši (65,3 %) in ti jih v varstvo vozijo.
There were 881 persons in paid employment in centres for protection and training; most of them in the programme paid for by the social welfare (83.0%). 
V obravnavanih centrih je bilo zaposlenih 881 delavcev, največ v programu, ki ga plačuje socialno varstvo, in sicer 83,0 %.
COMMENT In 2006 there were 69 old people's homes, 6 special social welfare institutions, 8 units for special forms of care for adults within old people's homes, 30 independent centres for protection and training, 21 units of such centres within other institutions and 19 licensed centres for protection and training operating in Slovenia. 
KOMENTAR V letu 2006 je bilo v Sloveniji 69 domov za starejše, 6 posebnih socialnovarstvenih zavodov, 8 enot za posebne oblike varstva odraslih, znotraj domov za starejše oz. njihovih dislociranih enot, 30 samostojnih varstveno-delovnih centrov, 21 enot varstveno-delovnih centrov v sestavi drugih zavodov ter 19 varstveno-delovnih centrov s koncesijo.
There were 13,699 people in care in old people's homes, of those 74.6% women. 
V domovih za starejše je bivalo 13 699 oskrbovancev, med njimi 74,6 % žensk.
Only 30.2% of people in care needed partial direct personal help. 
Med vsemi oskrbovanci je bilo le 30,2 % takih, ki potrebujejo delno neposredno osebno pomoč.
20.5% of people in care had moderate age and health problems and 49.3% of people in care had serious age and health problems and needed direct personal help. 
Zmerne starostne in zdravstvene težave je imelo 20,5 % oskrbovancev, hude starostne in zdravstvene težave pa 49,3 % oskrbovancev; ti so v celoti potrebovali neposredno osebno pomoč.
Persons in paid employment in old people's homes are financed from two sources: health and care programmes are financed by the health care, while social and basic care is financed by the social welfare. 
Zaposleni v teh domovih so financirani iz dveh virov: zdravstveni in negovalni program plačuje zdravstvo, socialno in osnovno oskrbo pa socialno varstvo.
There were 6,342 persons in paid employment in old people's homes (of those 91.1% women), namely 53.8% for health care services and 46.2% for social welfare services. 
Vseh zaposlenih v teh domovih je bilo skupaj 6 342 (med njimi 91,1 % žensk), in sicer za storitve zdravstvenega varstva 53,8 %, za storitve socialnega varstva pa 46,2 %.
On average an old people's home took care of 199 persons. 
V enem domu je bilo v povprečju v oskrbi 199 oskrbovancev.
Data for 2004, 2005 and 2006 cover people in care for special forms of care for mentally and physically handicapped adults within old people's homes together with people in care in special social welfare institutions for mentally and physically handicapped adults. 
V prikazu podatkov za leta 2004, 2005 in 2006 smo k oskrbovancem posebnih socialnovarstvenih zavodov za odrasle duševno in telesno prizadete osebe začeli šteti še oskrbovance v posebnih oblikah varstva odraslih duševno in telesno prizadetih oseb, ki delujejo kot posebne enote znotraj domov za starejše ali kot njihove dislocirane enote.
Because of this change the number of these people in care increased in 2004, 2005 in 2006. 
Zaradi te spremembe se je število takih oskrbovancev v letih 2004, 2005 in 2006 povečalo.