natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to comparable data for the population aged over 15, in 2008 with 10.9 litres of alcohol per capita Slovenia was close to the European Union average (10.8 litres per capita), and in the period 1980-2008 there was no change in the quantity of alcohol drunk per capita (OECD, 2010: 71). 
Po primerljivih podatkih za prebivalstvo nad 15 let je bila Slovenija leta 2008 z 10,9 litra alkohola na prebivalca blizu povprečja Evropske unije (10,8 litra na prebivalca), v obdobju 1980-2008 pa v količini popitega alkohola na prebivalca ni bilo spremembe (OECD, 2010: 71).
Have you ever tried smoking marijuana or hashish? 
Ali si kdaj poskusil/a kaditi marihuano ali hašiš?
Based on the analyses in this chapter we may therefore conclude: 
Na podlagi analiz v tem poglavju lahko ugotovimo:
8.6 Key ﬁ ndings 
8.6 Ključne ugotovitve
1. In the last fifteen years the young person age group has shown a decline in mortality from traffic accidents and suicides, the two most common causes of mortality in that period of life. 
1. V zadnjih petnajstih letih se v starostni skupini mladih zmanjšuje umrljivost zaradi prometnih nesreč in samomorov kot najpogostejših vzrokov umrljivosti mladih.
2. Compared to other age groups, young people show greater satisfaction with life and health. 
2. Zadovoljstvo mladih z življenjem in zdravjem je primerjalno z drugimi starostnimi skupinami večje.
In comparison with other European countries, young Slovenians are relatively satisfied with life in general. 
Primerjalno z evropskimi državami so mladi v Sloveniji sorazmerno zadovoljni z življenjem sploh.
In the assessment of satisfaction with health, the differences among European countries are quite small, while four fifths of young Slovenians are satisfied or very satisfied with their health. 
Pri oceni zadovoljstva z zdravjem so razlike med evropskimi državami manjše, štiri petine slovenskih mladih pa je s svojim zdravjem zadovoljnih ali zelo zadovoljnih.
3. More than two thirds of young people in Slovenia are of normal weight, but relative to the start of the decade the proportion of overweight and obese youth has grown. 
3. Več kot dve tretjini mladih v Sloveniji imata normalno težo, glede na leto 2000 pa se povečuje delež pretežkih ali predebelih.
4. The use of tobacco and tobacco products has declined slightly among young people, but more young people have experiences of using alcohol and illicit drugs. 
4. Uporaba tobaka in tobačnih izdelkov med mladimi blago upada, več mladih pa ima izkušnje z uživanjem alkohola in prepovedanih drog.
There is greater use of tobacco and alcohol among males, among the “student” age group and in urban environments, while experiences with illicit drugs are more typical of males in urban environments. 
Pogostejše je uživanje tobaka in alkohola med moškimi, v »študentski« starostni skupini in v urbanem okolju; izkušnje s prepovedanimi drogami pa so značilnejše za moške in v urbanem okolju.
5. If we summarise all the findings of the analysis of young Slovenians' state of health and in doing so exclude the subjective assessments of satisfaction with life, health and body image, as expected, males are the most differentiated risk group. 
5. Če povzamemo vse ugotovitve analize zdravstvenega stanja slovenskih mladih in pri tem izvzamemo subjektivne ocene zadovoljstva z življenjem, zdravjem in telesno podobo, so moški po pričakovanju najbolj razlikovalna rizična skupina.
7. In nutrition, special attention should be focused on young people in the countryside, since among them there are 10 percent more overweight and obese individuals than can be found comparatively in urban environments. 
7. Pri prehrani pa je treba posebno pozornost nameniti mladim na podeželju, saj je med njimi za več kot 10 odstotkov pretežkih in predebelih posameznikov, kot jih najdemo primerjalno v urbanih okoljih.
Sources used Bajt, M. (2007). 
8.7 Uporabljeni viri Bajt, M. (2007).
In: Helena Jeriček, Darja Lavtar and Tatjana Pokrajac (ed.), HBSC 
V: Helena Jeriček, Darja Lavtar in Tatjana Pokrajac (ur.), HBSC Slovenija
Slovenija 2006: Z zdravjem povezano vedenje v šolskem obdobju, 
2006: Z zdravjem povezano vedenje v šolskem obdobju, str.
Ljubljana: Health Protection Institute of the Republic of Slovenia. 
Ljubljana: Inštitut za varovanje zdravja Republike Slovenije.
Health Protection Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), www.ivz.si, 30. 11. 2010. 
Inštitut za varovanje zdravja Republike Slovenije, Evropska raziskava o zdravju/European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), www.ivz.si, 30. 11. 2010.
and Tatjana Pokrajac (ur.), HBSC Slovenija 2006: Z zdravjem povezano 
in Tatjana Pokrajac (ur.), HBSC Slovenija 2006: Z zdravjem povezano
Miheljak, V., et al. (2000). 
Miheljak, V., in drugi (2000).
Mihevc Ponikvar, B., and Rok Simon, M. (2009). 
Mihevc Ponikvar, B., in Rok Simon, M. (2009).
In: Tatjana Rakar and Urban Boljka (ed.), Med otroštvom in odraslostjo, pp. 95-110. 
V: Tatjana Rakar in Urban Boljka (ur.), Med otroštvom in odraslostjo, str.
In: Mirjana Nastran Ule (ed.), 
V: Mirjana Nastran Ule (ur.),
Mladina v devetdesetih: Analiza stanja v Sloveniji, pp. 143-198. 
Mladina v devetdesetih: Analiza stanja v Sloveniji, str.
Toš, N., et al. (2001). 
Toš, N., in drugi (2001).
Slovensko javno mnenje 2001/3: Raziskava o zdravju in zdravstvu IV. in Raziskava o obrambi in varnosti [database]. 
Slovensko javno mnenje 2001/3: Raziskava o zdravju in zdravstvu IV. in Raziskava o obrambi in varnosti [datoteka
of Sociology, Political Science and Journalism. 
za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo.
Ule, M., et al. (1993). 
Ule, M., in drugi (1993).
Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, Social Science Data Archive [production and distribution], 2000. 
Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede, Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov [izdelava in izdelava], 2000.
Official Journal of the European Union (2009). 
Uradni list Evropske unije (2009).
COUNCIL RESOLUTION of 27 November 2009 on a renewed framework for European cooperation in the youth field (2010-2018) (2009/C 311/01). 
RESOLUCIJA SVETA z dne 27. novembra 2009 o prenovljenem okviru za evropsko sodelovanje na področju mladine (2010-2018) (2009/C 311/01).
9 The economic status of young people 
9 Gmotni položaj mladih
Where discussion turns to the economic status of young people, the focus is usually first on their disposable income and its primary sources, and then on the factors that determine the level of that income and their correlates. 
Ko se govori o gmotnem položaju mladih, se običajno najprej govori o njihovem razpoložljivem dohodku in njegovih glavnih virih, nato pa še o dejavnikih, ki določajo višino tega dohodka, in o njihovih korelatih.
Here the emphasis is most frequently on categories such as employment status and level of educational qualifications, although it is not possible to get around issues associated with access to the labour market and education, mobility, housing and social policies, social protection and so forth. 
Pri tem se najpogosteje poudarjajo kategorije, kot so zaposlitveni status in raven dosežene izobrazbe, ni pa se mogoče izogniti vprašanjem, ki se nanašajo na dostop do trga dela in izobraževanja, mobilnost, stanovanjsko in socialno politiko, socialno varstvo itd.
In this light, the economic and social status of young people is therefore associated closely with policies relating to the labour market, welfare state measures, education, family, social and other policies. 
Iz povedanega izhaja, da je ekonomski in socialni položaj mladih tesno povezan s politikami, ki se nanašajo na trg dela, ukrepe države blaginje, izobraževalno, družinsko, socialno in še katero politiko.
9.1 Poverty among young Slovenians below the European average 
9.1 Revščina mladih v Sloveniji pod evropskim povprečjem
The difficulties arising in this regard impact the level of employment among young people, the time they leave home, the conditions in which they live, the time they decide to start a family and so on, and indirectly and directly also the level of poverty among young people. 
Težave, ki se pojavljajo v zvezi s tem, vplivajo na stopnjo zaposlenosti med mladimi, na to, kdaj odidejo od doma, v kakšnih razmerah živijo, kdaj se odločajo za družino ipd., posredno in neposredno pa tudi na raven revščine med mladimi.
Nagode, Smole and Boljka (2009) point out that in terms of their exposure to the risk of poverty, young Slovenians are in a relatively good position compared to their European peers, but here they also point out that this “cannot be attributed to the labour market, which is hard for young people to get into, but primarily to the functioning of an informal support network evident in young adults extending the time they live in their original family, and the relatively successful functioning of the social protection system« (ibid.: 57). 
Nagodetova, Smolejeva in Boljka (2009) nakažejo, da so slovenski mladi, ko gre za njihovo izpostavljenost tveganju revščine, v sorazmerno boljšem položaju kot njihovi evropski vrstniki, toda ob tem opozarjajo, da »za to ni odgovoren trg delovne sile, na katerega se mladi le s težavo vključujejo, ampak predvsem delovanje neformalnih podpor, ki se kažejo v podaljševanju bivanja mladih v izvorni družini, in razmeroma uspešno delovanje sistema socialnega varstva« (prav tam: 57).
NOTE: The level of poverty risk is expressed as the percentage of persons living in households with disposable equivalent income below the threshold of poverty risk (60 percent of median income per equivalent member. 
OPOMBA: Stopnja tveganja revščine je izražena kot odstotek oseb, ki živijo v gospodinjstvih z razpoložljivim ekvivalentnim dohodkom pod pragom tveganja revščine (60 odstotkov mediane dohodka na ekvivalentnega člana.
For an explanation of the calculation method, see footnote104). 
Za obrazložitev načina izračuna glej opombo105).
DATA source: Eurostat, SORS 
V IR podatkov: Eurostat, SURS
Then for each household disposable net income per equivalent member is calculated using the OECD adjusted equivalence scale. 
Nato se za vsako gospodinjstvo izračuna razpoložljivi neto dohodek na ekvivalentnega člana s pomočjo OECD-jeve prilagojene ekvivalenčne lestvice.
The scale gives the first adult member a weighting of 1, the second member aged 14 or over a weighting of 0.5, and children under 14 a weighting of 0.3. 
Lestvica daje prvemu odraslemu članu utež 1, drugim članom, starim 14 let ali več, utež 0,5, otrokom, mlajšim od 14 let, pa utež 0,3.
A four-member household of two adults and two children will thus have 2.1 equivalent adult members (calculation: 1 * 1 + 1 * 0.5 + 2 * 0.3 = 2.1). 
Štiričlansko gospodinjstvo dveh odraslih in dveh otrok ima tako 2,1 ekvivalentnega odraslega člana (izračun: 1 * 1 + 1 * 0,5 + 2 * 0,3 = 2,1).
Indeed a full 78 percent of Slovenians believe that poverty is very widespread in Slovenia (on average 73 percent of Europeans believe this) (Eurobarometer, 2010). 
Sloveniji zelo razširjena (v povprečju tako meni 73 odstotkov Evropejcev) (Eurobarometer, 2010).
The presented data also show one more Slovenian variance from Europe. 
Iz prikazanih podatkov pa je razvidno še eno odstopanje Slovenije od Evrope.
While young people in Europe are more exposed to poverty risk than the average European, the exact opposite is true in Slovenia. 
Medtem ko so mladi v Evropi v primerjavi s povprečnim Evropejcem bolj izpostavljeni tveganju revščine, za mlade v Sloveniji velja ravno nasprotno.
As has already been indicated, this difference may be at least partly ascribed to the system of informal support, and more precisely to the fact that young people in Slovenia are very late in leaving their parental home (Mandič, 2009; see also the chapter Housing and living conditions of young people), meaning that the late departure from home is actually functional in terms of maintaining a relatively favourable picture presented by Slovenia regarding poverty among young people. 
Kot je bilo že bilo nakazano, lahko to razliko vsaj deloma pripišemo sistemu neformalnih podpor, natančneje dejstvu, da mladi v Sloveniji zelo pozno zapuščajo dom svojih staršev (Mandič, 2009; glej tudi poglavje Stanovanjske in bivanjske razmere mladih), kar pomeni, da so pozni odhodi od doma pravzaprav funkcionalni z vidika ohranjanja razmeroma ugodne slike, ki jo glede revščine mladih izkazuje Slovenija.
The level of poverty risk among young people in Slovenia is distinctly lower than the level of risk encountered by young people elsewhere in Europe. 
Stopnja tveganja revščine med mladimi v Sloveniji je opazno nižja od stopnje tveganja, s katero se srečujejo mladi v Evropi.
Part of this difference may be explained by the late departure of Slovenian youth from their parental homes. 
Del teh razlik je mogoče pojasniti s pomočjo poznega odhoda slovenskih mladih od doma svojih staršev.
Of course there is the danger that in circumstances where young people are finding it increasingly difficult to get into the jobs market, and they are being forced to accept increasingly insecure employment, this picture will deteriorate. 
Seveda pa obstaja nevarnost, da se bo v razmerah, v katerih se mladi vse teže vključujejo na trg dela, če pa že, pa so tam primorani sprejemati vse manj varne zaposlitve, ta slika poslabšala.
The highest levels of poverty in Slovenia can indeed be found among the unemployed (graph below). 
Najvišje stopnje revščine v Sloveniji je namreč mogoče najti med brezposelnimi (grafikon spodaj).
Total 
Delovno neaktivni
Male 
Brezposelni
Female 
Upokojeni
** The level of poverty risk by most frequent status of activity is calculated relative to the predominant status of activity of the person over the entire year. 
** Stopnja tveganja revščine glede na najpogostejši status aktivnosti je izračunana glede na prevladujoči status aktivnosti osebe v celem letu.
Persons who are younger or older than the set age are not used in calculating this indicator. 
Osebe, ki so mlajše ali starejše od določene starosti, se pri izračunu tega kazalnika ne upoštevajo.
Predominant status of the person's activity is the status that the person had for at least seven months in the income reference year. 
Prevladujoči status aktivnosti osebe je status, ki ga je oseba imela vsaj sedem mesecev v dohodkovnem referenčnem letu.
Persons for whom it is not possible to determine any status of activity for at least seven months of the year are not used in calculating this indicator. 
Osebe, ki jim najmanj za sedem mesecev v letu ni mogoče določiti nobenega statusa aktivnosti, se pri izračunu tega kazalnika ne upoštevajo.
Work-active relates to those persons that were employed or self-employed for at least seven months in the year. 
Delovno aktivne so osebe, ki so bile zaposlene ali samozaposlene vsaj sedem mesecev v letu.
Work-inactive relates to all persons that were unemployed, retired or otherwise inactive for at least seven months in the year. 
Delovno neaktivne so vse osebe, ki so bile brezposelne, upokojene ali drugače neaktivne vsaj sedem mesecev v letu.
Other inactive persons are housewives, school and university students and people unable to work. 
Druge neaktivne osebe so gospodinje, dijaki in študenti ter za delo nezmožne osebe.
DATA SOURCE: Eurostat, SORS 
VIR podatkov: Eurostat, SURS
9.2 Incomes of young people in Slovenia - discrepancy between official data and self-assessment 
9.2 Dohodki mladih v Sloveniji - neskladje med uradnimi podatki in samooceno
An analysis of young people's incomes (16-24 years) shows that in 2007 the average annual equivalent net disposable income of young people in EU-25 was around 40 percent higher than the income of young people in Slovenia (Nagode, Smolej and Boljka, 2009; in Rakar and Boljka, 2009), with the difference being even greater if we compare Slovenian youth to Italian, German or Austrian youth. 
Analiza dohodka mladih (16-24 let) pokaže, da je bil leta 2007 povprečni letni ekvivalentni neto razpoložljivi dohodek mladih v EU 25 za približno 40 odstotkov višji od dohodka mladih v Sloveniji (Nagode, Smolej in Boljka, 2009; v Rakar in Boljka, 2009), pri čemer je razlika še večja, če slovenske mlade primerjamo z italijansko, nemško ali avstrijsko mladino.
Judging from Eurostat data, in 2009 youth in those countries on average “disposed” of105 almost 70 percent higher incomes. 
Sodeč po podatkih Eurostata, je ta leta 2009 v povprečju »razpolagala«106 s skoraj 70 odstotki višjimi dohodki.
Yet on the other hand this same age group in Slovenia disposed of incomes that were on average as much as 170 percent higher than those at the disposal of Hungarian youth, who in this regard are lagging behind increasingly (graph below). 
Toda ta ista starostna skupina v Sloveniji je po drugi strani razpolagala z dohodki, ki so bili v povprečju za kar 170 odstotkov višji od tistih, s katerimi je razpolagala madžarska mladina, ki v tem pogledu tudi vse bolj zaostaja (grafikon spodaj).
105 As is evident in the previous footnote, this is not income received by persons at a certain age, but income calculated on the basis of the equivalent income of persons of a certain age (which depends on the income of the household in which the persons live). 
106 Kot je razvidno iz prejšnje opombe, ne gre za dohodek, ki so ga prejele osebe v določeni starosti, ampak za dohodek, ki se izračuna na podlagi ekvivalentnega dohodka oseb določene starosti (ki je odvisen od dohodka gospodinjstva, v katerem osebe živijo).
Graph 98: Average annual equivalent disposable net income of young people in Slovenia* (expressed in euros 1999 and PPP2) compared to other age groups and young people in Europe3, 
Grafikon 98: Povprečni letni ekvivalentni razpoložljivi neto dohodek mladih v Sloveniji* (izražen v evrih 1999 in PKM**) v primerjavi z drugimi starostnimi skupinami in mladimi v Evropi***, 2005-2009
Euros 1999 
Evri 1999
16-24 Germany 16-24 Italy 16-24 Hungary 16-24 Austria 16-24 Slovenia 16-64 Slovenia 65+ Slovenia 
16-24 Nemčija 16-24 Italija 16-24 Madžarska 16-24 Avstrija 16-24 Slovenija 16-64 Slovenija 65+ Slovenija
PPP 
OPOMBE:
* The basis for the calculation is the annual equivalent disposable net income of households that participated in the survey of income and living conditions (silc; for a detailed description of the calculation of annual equivalent disposable net household income, see footnote 107), on the basis of which the disposable net income per equivalent member is calculated. 
* Osnova za izračun je letni ekvivalentni razpoložljivi neto dohodek gospodinjstev, ki so sodelovala v raziskovanju o dohodkih in življenjskih pogojih (SILC; za podroben opis izračuna letnega ekvivalentnega razpoložljivega neto dohodka gospodinjstva glej sprotno opombo 107), na podlagi katerega se izračuna razpoložljivi neto dohodek na ekvivalentnega člana.
This then provides the basis for calculating average income for slovenia overall and by speciﬁ c age group. 
Na tej podlagi se nato izračuna povprečni dohodek za Slovenijo skupaj in po posameznih starostnih skupinah.
Average income is not calculated on the basis of income received by persons at a certain age, but on the basis of the equivalent income of persons of a certain age (which depends on the income of the household in which the persons live). 
Povprečni dohodek se ne izračuna na podlagi dohodka, ki so ga prejele osebe v določeni starosti, ampak na podlagi ekvivalentnega dohodka oseb določene starosti (ki je odvisen od dohodka gospodinjstva, v katerem osebe živijo).
The (weighted) equivalent income of persons in the age group is added up and divided by the number of persons (weighted) in the age group (sors, 2010). 
Sešteje se (uteženi) ekvivalentni dohodek oseb v starostni skupini in deli s številom oseb (uteženim) v starostni skupini (SURS, 2010).
** PPP - purchasing power parity (excludes the effect of price differences). 
** PKM - pariteta kupne moči (izločitev vpliva razlik med cenami).
*** Since the latest available data from Eurostat do not include data for the eu, for the period 2005-2007 we used data cited in the report by Nagode, Smolej and Boljka (2009: 60; in Rakar and Boljka, 2009). 
*** Ker zadnji razpoložljivi podatki Eurostata ne vključujejo podatkov za EU, smo za obdobje 20052007 uporabili podatke, ki jih v svojem poročilu navajajo Nagode, Smolej in Boljka (2009: 60; v Rakar in Boljka, 2009).
SOURCE: Eurostat- Population and social conditions/Living conditions and welfare/Income and living condition/Income distribution and monetary poverty; Rakar and Boljka, 2009 
VIR: Eurostat- Population and social conditions/Living conditions and welfare/Income and living condition/Income distribution and monetary poverty; Rakar in Boljka, 2009
The reduction in the difference is even more noticeable when young Slovenians are compared to their Italian counterparts. 
Zmanjšanje razlik je še opaznejše, ko slovenske mlade primerjamo z njihovimi italijanskimi vrstniki.
While in 2008 young adults in Italy on average had disposable income that was, in absolute terms, just under 40 percent higher than the disposable income of young Slovenians, on average that amount would only buy them under 7 percent more comparable goods. 
Če so leta 2008 mladostniki v Italiji v povprečju razpolagali z dohodkom, ki je bil v absolutnem znesku za slabih 40 odstotkov višji od razpoložljivega dohodka slovenskih mladostnikov, so lahko s tem zneskom v povprečju kupili le za slabih 7 odstotkov več primerljivih dobrin.
Meanwhile young Slovenians are also in a relatively good situation when their disposable income is compared to the oldest age group (65 and over). 
Sicer so slovenski mladi v razmeroma boljšem položaju tudi, ko se njihov razpoložljivi dohodek primerja z najstarejšo skupino prebivalstva (65 let in več).
In 2009 their average disposable income was around 11 percent lower than the disposable income of young people aged 16 to 24 years, while official Eurostat data also indicate that all age groups in Slovenia, including youth, are gaining in real terms, irrespective of whether the income is expressed in fixed prices or PPP. 
Njihov povprečni razpoložljivi dohodek je bil leta 2009 za okoli 11 odstotkov nižji od tistega, s katerim je razpolagala skupina mladih, starih od 16 do 24 let, uradni podatki Eurostata pa tudi kažejo, da vse starostne skupine v Sloveniji, vključno z mladimi, realno pridobivajo, in to ne glede na to, ali je dohodek izražen v stalnih cenah ali v PKM.
Although official Eurostat data show that the disposable income of young Slovenians is noticeably less than the EU-25 average, these same data indicate that the disposable income of young people (16-24 years) is growing in real terms, and taking into account price differences, the purchasing power of young people in Slovenia is even approaching that of young people in economically more advanced EU countries (Italy, Germany and Austria). 
Čeprav uradni podatki Eurostata kažejo, da je razpoložljivi dohodek mladih v Sloveniji opazno nižji od povprečja EU-25, pa ti isti podatki nakazujejo, da razpoložljivi dohodek mladih (16-24 let) realno raste, ob upoštevanju razlik v cenah pa se kupna moč mladih v Sloveniji celo približuje kupni moči mladih iz gospodarsko razvitejših držav EU (Italija, Nemčija, Avstrija).
The findings of our study paint a slightly different picture. 
Izsledki naše študije kažejo nekoliko drugačno sliko.
Those doing contract work, in other words including those young people who do a variety of jobs via the student employment services, are in real terms today in a worse position than their peers in 2000 (graph below). 
Honorarno zaposleni, torej tudi tisti mladi, ki opravljajo razna dela prek študentskih servisov, so danes realno na slabšem, kot so bili njihovi vrstniki leta 2000 (grafikon spodaj).
Graph 99: Estimate of average monthly disposable income of young people (15-29 years) by employment status, in euros, Youth 2000* and Youth 2010 
Grafikon 99: Ocena povprečnega mesečnega razpoložljivega dohodka mladih (15-29 let) glede na zaposlitveni status, v evrih, Mladina 2000* in Mladina 2010
Steady/ﬁ xed term 
Redno/ določen čas
Youth 2000 Youth 2010 
Mladina 2000 Mladina 2010
Steady/ permanent 
Redno/ nedoločen čas
Self-employed Contract work 
Samozaposlen Honorarno delo
Without steady work 
Brez rednega dela