natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
At an unknown time, the applicant and his family submitted requests for asylum in Germany. 
Na neugotovljeni datum so pritožnik in člani njegove družine v Nemčiji vložili prošnjo za azil.
Subsequently, the applicant and his family returned to Slovenia. 
Pozneje se je pritožnik z družino vrnil v Slovenijo.
On 13 July 2005 the applicant and his family submitted an application for temporary residence permits. 
julija 2005 je pritožnik z družino oddal prošnjo za dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje.
On 25 July 2005 they also applied for permanent residence permits under the Legal Status Act. 
julija 2005 so zaprosili tudi za izdajo dovoljenj za stalno prebivanje po ZUSDDD.
Since they believed that they ran the risk of being deported, on 26.September 2005 the applicant and his family also submitted asylum requests. 
Ker so menili, da jim grozi izgon iz države, so pritožnik in njegovi družinski člani 26. septembra 2005 oddali tudi prošnje za azil.
In addition, the applicant sought refugee status. 
Poleg tega je pritožnik zaprosil za status begunca.
Further to the withdrawal of their asylum requests, on 19 October 2005 the Ministry terminated the proceedings. 
Po umiku prošenj za azil je ministrstvo 19. oktobra 2005 ustavilo postopek.
The Ministry also ordered that the applicant and his family should return to Germany. 
Prav tako je ministrstvo odredilo, da se pritožnik in člani njegove družine vrnejo v Nemčijo.
On 28 October 2005 the removal order was issued but was not executed. 
28.oktobra 2005 je bil izdan nalog za izgon, vendar pa ni bil izvršen.
On 10 November 2005 a new removal order was issued, setting the date of removal for 18.November 2005. The applicant started proceedings before the Administrative Court. 
novembra 2005 je bil izdan nov nalog za izgon, ki je kot datum navedel 18. november 2005. Pritožnik je sprožil postopek pred upravnim sodiščem.
On 15 November 2005 his request was granted. 
novembra 2005 je bilo njegovemu predlogu ugodeno.
At that time the case also received considerable attention from the local and international community owing to the efforts of Amnesty International. 
Takrat je bil primer zaradi prizadevanj Amnesty International deležen precejšnje pozornosti domače in tuje skupnosti.
On 27 February 2006 the family again applied for asylum in Slovenia. 
februarja 2006 je družina ponovno zaprosila za azil v Sloveniji.
They were living in an asylum centre at the time. 
Živeli so v azilnem domu.
On 28 April 2006 the applicant brought a complaint before the Administrative Court, alleging inaction on the part of the administrative authorities in the proceedings relating to the permanent residence permits for him, his wife and their four children. 
aprila 2006.je pritožnik vložil tožbo pred upravnim sodiščem zaradi molka upravnega organa v postopku za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje zase, svojo ženo in štiri otroke.
On 19 July 2006 the German authorities informed the Slovenian authorities that Germany had jurisdiction under the Dublin Regulation to examine the asylum requests by the Berisha family. 
julija 2006 so nemški organi obvestili slovenske, da je po Dublinski uredbi za obravnavo prošenj za azil družine Berisha pristojna Nemčija.
On 28 July 2006 the applicant&apos;s fifth child was born in Slovenia. 
julija 2006 se je v Sloveniji rodil peti pritožnikov otrok.
On 30 October 2006 the Ministry decided, further to the above-mentioned decision of the German authorities, that it did not have jurisdiction to examine the asylum requests by the applicant and his family and that they would be handed over to Germany. 
oktobra 2006 je ministrstvo glede na navedeno odločitev nemških organov odločilo, da ni pristojno za obravnavo prošenj za azil pritožnika in njegove družine ter da bodo izročeni Nemčiji.
The Ministry had also received fresh evidence that Mr and his family were asylum seekers in Germany, where they had received financial aid for that purpose. 
Ministrstvo je tudi prejelo nove dokaze, da so Berisha in člani njegove družine zaprosili za azil v Nemčiji, kjer so v ta namen tudi prejeli denarno pomoč.
On 5 November 2006 the applicant and his family instituted proceedings in the Administrative Court, contesting the Ministry&apos;s decision. 
novembra 2006 so pritožnik in člani njegove družine sprožili postopek pred upravnim sodiščem in izpodbijali sklep ministrstva.
On the same day they also requested the non-enforcement of the impugned decision and withdrew their application for asylum (see paragraph 147 above). 
Istega dne so zaprosili tudi za neizvršitev izpodbijane odločbe in umaknili prošnjo za azil (glej 147. odstavek).
According to the applicant, on 7 November 2006 the Ministry again tried to transfer him and his family to Germany. 
Po pritožnikovih besedah ga je ministrstvo 7. novembra 2006 skupaj z družino znova skušalo premestiti v Nemčijo.
On 15 November 2006 the Administrative Court annulled the removal order. 
novembra 2006 je upravno sodišče razveljavilo nalog za izgon.
The Ministry lodged an appeal. 
Ministrstvo je vložilo ugovor.
On 28.December 2006 the Supreme Court upheld the Ministry&apos;s decision of 30 October 2006 that Germany had jurisdiction under the Dublin Regulation to decide on the applicant&apos;s request for asylum. 
decembra 2006 je vrhovno sodišče potrdilo sklep ministrstva z dne 30. oktobra 2006, da je po Dublinski uredbi za odločitev o pritožnikovi prošnji za azil pristojna Nemčija.
On 1 February 2007 the applicant and his family were handed over to Germany, where they have lived with &quot;toleration&quot; status (Duldung). 
februarja 2007 so pritožnika in njegovo družino izročili Nemčiji, kjer živijo in imajo status &quot;toleriran&quot; (Duldung).
Neither the applicant nor his family have applied for Slovenian citizenship. 
Ne pritožnik ne člani njegove družine niso nikoli zaprosili za slovensko državljanstvo.
In the context of asylum proceedings, on 18 April 2008 the Constitutional Court rejected a constitutional appeal by the applicant. 
V azilnem postopku je ustavno sodišče 18. aprila 2008 zavrnilo pritožnikovo ustavno pritožbo.
On 19 October 2010 Mr was granted both ex nunc and ex tunc residence permits further to his request lodged on 25 July 2005 (see paragraph 143 above). 
oktobra 2010 sta bili Aliju Berishi izdani dovoljenji za stalno prebivanje z veljavnostjo od dneva izdaje (ex nunc) in za nazaj (ex tunc) na podlagi prošnje, vložene 25. julija 2005 (glej 143. odstavek).
The permits were delivered to him on 24 November 2010 through the Slovenian Consulate in Munich. 
novembra 2010 sta mu bili izročeni prek slovenskega konzulata v Münchnu.
The applicant, who is currently still living in Germany, stated that he was for the time being prevented from returning to Slovenia as his five children and his wife did not have any legal status there and would not have fullfilled the conditions for family reunion under the Aliens Act. 
Pritožnik, ki trenutno še vedno živi v Nemčiji, je navedel, da se še ne more vrniti v Slovenijo, ker njegova žena in pet otrok tam nimajo nobenega pravnega statusa in ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za združitev družine po Zakonu o tujcih.
On an unspecified date, the applicant filed a compensation claim with the State Attorney&apos;s Office, which was rejected. 
Na neugotovljeni datum je pritožnik vložil odškodninski zahtevek na državnem pravobranilstvu, ki pa je bil zavrnjen.
According to the respondent Government, he did not initiate court proceedings. 
Po navedbah tožene vlade ni sprožil sodnega postopka.
Mr was born on 28 July 1952 in Skopje (&quot;the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia&quot;) in a Roma ethnic community. 
Ilfan Sadik Ademi se je rodil 28. julija 1952 v Skopju (Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija) in je pripadnik romske etnične skupnosti.
He is now a Macedonian citizen. 
Zdaj je makedonski državljan.
In 1977 he moved to Slovenia, where he worked until 1992. He had his permanent residence registered there from 27.September 1977 to 26 February 1992. 
Leta 1977 se je preselil v Slovenijo, kjer je delal do leta 1992. V Sloveniji je imel stalno prebivališče prijavljeno od 27. septembra 1977 do 26. februarja 1992.
According to the applicant, in 1991 he missed the deadline for applying for Slovenian citizenship. 
Pritožnik je po lastnih navedbah leta 1991 zamudil rok za prošnjo za slovensko državljanstvo.
In 1993 he was stopped by the police in the course of a routine check. 
Leta 1993 ga je ustavila policija med rutinsko kontrolo.
Since he had no valid identity documents, he and his family were expelled to Hungary. 
Ker ni imel veljavnih osebnih dokumentov, so njega in člane njegove družine izgnali na Madžarsko.
The applicant maintained that he had learned about the &quot;erasure&quot; at that time. 
Pritožnik je navedel, da je za izbris izvedel takrat.
Shortly afterwards the applicant and his family moved to Croatia, from where they re-entered Slovenia illegally. 
Kmalu za tem so se pritožnik in njegova družina preselili na Hrvaško, od koder so nezakonito vstopili v Slovenijo.
On 23 November 1992 the applicant applied for Slovenian citizenship with the assistance of a lawyer. 
novembra 1992 je pritožnik prek odvetnika zaprosil za slovensko državljanstvo.
The applicant later moved to Germany, where he declared himself a stateless person and obtained a temporary residence permit and a passport for foreigners. 
Pritožnik se je nato preselil v Nemčijo, kjer se je izrekel za osebo brez državljanstva; izdana sta mu bila dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje in potni list za tujce.
On 9 February 1999 he requested the Embassy of &quot;the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia&quot; to issue him with a passport, but received a negative reply since he was not a citizen of that country. 
februarja 1999 je na veleposlaništvu Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije zaprosil za izdajo potnega lista, vendar je bila prošnja zavrnjena, ker ni bil njen državljan.
On 16 February 2005 the applicant applied for a permanent residence permit under the Legal Status Act. 
februarja 2005 je pritožnik zaprosil za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje po ZUSDDD.
On 20 April 2005 the Ministry requested him to supplement his application with evidence of citizenship. 
aprila 2005 ga je ministrstvo zaprosilo, naj prošnjo dopolni z dokazilom o državljanstvu.
On 26 May 2005 his application was rejected on the ground that he was a stateless person. 
maja 2005 je bila njegova prošnja zavrnjena, ker je pritožnik oseba brez državljanstva.
The Ministry stated that the Legal Status Act applied only to citizens of other successor States to the former SFRY. 
Ministrstvo je navedlo, da se ZUSDDD uporablja samo za državljane drugih držav naslednic nekdanje SFRJ.
On 11 July 2005 the Ministry replied to a letter from the applicant seeking a further examination of his application for Slovenian citizenship lodged in 1992. It informed him that, since he did not appear to have lived in Slovenia for the preceding ten years, he did not meet the requirements for Slovenian citizenship under the amended Citizenship Act. 
julija 2005 je ministrstvo odgovorilo na pritožnikovo prošnjo, s katero je predlagal nadaljnjo obravnavo njegove prošnje za slovensko državljanstvo iz leta 1992. Obvestilo ga je, da ne izpolnjuje pogojev za slovensko državljanstvo po leta 2002 sprejetem Zakonu o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o državljanstvu, ker ni dokazal, da je preteklih deset let živel v Sloveniji.
On 9 September 2005 his application for Slovenian citizenship was dismissed. 
septembra 2005 je bila njegova prošnja za slovensko državljanstvo zavrnjena.
On 31 July 2007 the applicant again applied for a permanent residence permit under the Legal Status Act..On 31 March 2008 the Ministry rejected his application, again on the ground that he was not a citizen of any other successor State to the former SFRY. 
julija 2007 je pritožnik ponovno zaprosil za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje po ZUSDDD. marca 2008 je bila njegova prošnja zavrnjena, in sicer ponovno zato, ker pritožnik ni državljan ene od držav naslednic nekdanje SFRJ.
The applicant started proceedings before the Administrative Court. 
Pritožnik je sprožil postopek pred upravnim sodiščem.
On 18 February 2009 the Administrative Court upheld the decision by the Ministry, dismissing the applicant&apos;s request for a permanent residence permit. 
februarja 2009 je upravno sodišče podprlo odločbo ministrstva in zavrnilo pritožnikovo prošnjo za dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje.
The applicant appealed. 
Pritožnik se je pritožil.
On 6 October 2010 the Supreme Court granted his appeal and sent the case back for re-examination. 
oktobra 2010 je vrhovno sodišče pritožbi ugodilo in poslalo primer v ponovno obravnavo.
It noted that the amended Legal Status Act had been enacted in the meantime and that the applicant&apos;s request should now be examined in the light of the new legislation. 
Ugotovilo je, da je v vmesnem obdobju začel veljati spremenjeni in dopolnjeni ZUSDDD, zato je treba pritožnikovo prošnjo obravnavati po novi zakonodaji.
In the course of these proceedings, the applicant submitted a Macedonian passport issued on 19.August 2010. 
Med postopkom je pritožnik predložil makedonski potni list, izdan 19. avgusta 2010.
On 20 April 2011 Mr was granted both ex nunc and ex tunc residence permits. 
aprila 2011 sta bili Ilfanu Sadiku Ademiju podeljeni dovoljenji za prebivanje z veljavnostjo od dneva izdaje (ex nunc) in za nazaj (ex tunc).
They were delivered to him on 23 May 2011. 
Dovoljenji sta mu bili izročeni 23. maja 2011.
The applicant, who has serious health problems, is currently living between Slovenia and Germany, where his temporary status has been terminated in the meantime. 
Pritožnik, ki ima hude zdravstvene težave, trenutno živi med Slovenijo in Nemčijo, kjer so mu začasno dovoljenje medtem ukinili.
Mr was born on 4 April 1972 in Podujevo (Kosovo). 
se je rodil 4. aprila 1972 v Podujevu (Kosovo).
He moved to Slovenia with his family in 1977. The applicant completed elementary school, followed by a three-year secondary school course in cookery. 
Leta 1977 se je z družino preselil v Slovenijo. Pritožnik je končal osnovno šolo in triletno srednjo poklicno kuharsko šolo.
He was registered as a resident in Slovenia from 1 August 1984 to 26.February 1992. 
Stalno prebivališče v Sloveniji je imel prijavljeno od 1. avgusta 1984 do 26. februarja 1992.
According to the applicant, in 1991 he was visiting his grandparents in Kosovo. For that reason, he and his family missed the deadline for submitting the application for Slovenian citizenship by one month, as the war in Kosovo had made collecting the necessary documents difficult. 
Po pritožnikovih navedbah je leta 1991 obiskal svoje stare starše na Kosovu, zato je skupaj z družino za en mesec zamudil rok za vlogo prošnje za slovensko državljanstvo, saj je bilo zaradi vojne na Kosovu težko zbrati vse potrebne dokumente.
According to the Government, there was no evidence that Mr. had applied for Slovenian citizenship in 1991. In addition, it followed from the applicant&apos;s employment documents that he had been working in Podujevo from 1992 until 1999. He married a Serbian citizen, with whom he has four children. 
Po navedbah vlade ni dokazov, da je Zoran Minić leta 1991 zaprosil za slovensko državljanstvo. Poleg tega iz pritožnikove delovne knjižice izhaja, da je bil od leta 1992 do leta 1999 zaposlen v Podujevu. Poročil se je s srbsko državljanko, s katero ima štiri otroke.
The applicant stated that he had found out that he had been &quot;erased&quot; together with other members of his family when trying to regularise his status in Slovenia. 
Po navedbi pritožnika je ugotovil, da je bil izbrisan skupaj z drugimi člani družine, ko je poskušal urediti svoj status v Sloveniji.
As a result of the unbearable living conditions in Slovenia without any legal status, he had been compelled to move temporarily to Kosovo. 
Zaradi nevzdržnih življenjskih razmer brez pravnega statusa v Sloveniji je bil prisiljen, da se začasno preseli na Kosovo.
He returned to Slovenia on several occasions. 
V Slovenijo se je večkrat vrnil.
In 2002 the applicant was arrested by the police in Slovenia because he was working without a permit. 
Leta 2002 je v Sloveniji prijela policija, saj je delal brez dovoljenja.
He was prosecuted, ordered to pay a fine and on 5 June 2002 expelled to Hungary, in spite of the Constitutional Court&apos;s decision of 4.February 1999 (see paragraphs 41-48 above), without any formal order. 
Uveden je bil postopek o prekršku, naloženo mu je bilo plačilo denarne kazni, 5. junija 2002 pa je bil brez izdaje kakršne koli odločbe izgnan na Madžarsko, in to kljub odločbi ustavnega sodišča z dne 4. februarja 1999 (glej 41.-48. odstavek).
The applicant stated that he had not applied for any legal status in Slovenia for many years because he did not meet the conditions for Slovenian citizenship or for a permanent residence permit under the legislation existing at the time. 
Pritožnik je izjavil, da veliko let ni zaprosil za pravni status v Sloveniji zato, ker ni izpolnjeval pogojev za slovensko državljanstvo niti za dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje po tedaj veljavni zakonodaji.
As to his family, his mother was eventually granted Slovenian citizenship in 2000 and his siblings in 2003. 
Njegovi materi je bilo leta 2000 podeljeno slovensko državljanstvo, njegovim bratom oziroma sestram pa leta 2003.
After the delivery of the Constitutional Court&apos;s decision of 3.April 2003 (see paragraphs 58-60 above), on 15 September 2003 the applicant applied for Slovenian citizenship under section 19 of the amended Citizenship Act. 
Po izdaji odločbe ustavnega sodišča z dne 3. aprila 2003 (glej 58.-60. odstavek) je pritožnik 15. septembra 2003 zaprosil za slovensko državljanstvo na podlagi 19. a dopolnjenega in spremenjenega Zakona o državljanstvu.
Between 26 April and 9 October 2004 the Ministry asked the applicant five times to complete his application by providing evidence, among other things, that he had been living in Slovenia without interruption since 23 December 1990. When he failed to do so, he was summoned for a hearing at the Ministry. 
Med 26. aprilom in 9. oktobrom 2004 je ministrstvo pritožnika petkrat pozvalo, naj dopolni prošnjo s predložitvijo dokazov, med drugim o tem, da od 23. decembra 1990 dalje neprekinjeno živi v Sloveniji. Ker tega ni storil, je bil povabljen na ministrstvo na zaslišanje.
At the hearing on 17 December 2004 he confirmed the information stated in his employment record, namely that he had worked in Podujevo (Kosovo) from 8 January 1992 to 6 April 1999 and had thus not been living in Slovenia uninterruptedly since 23 December 1990. 
Na zaslišanju je 17. decembra 2004 potrdil pravilnost podatkov iz delovne knjižice, da je namreč od 8. januarja 1992 do 6. aprila 1999 delal v Podujevu (Kosovo) in da torej od 23. decembra 1990 dalje ni neprekinjeno živel v Sloveniji.
On 21.February 2006 his application for Slovenian citizenship was accordingly dismissed. 
februarja 2006 je bila skladno s tem zavrnjena njegova prošnja za slovensko državljanstvo.
That decision was served on Mr between 28.June and 2 July 2006 during a trip to Slovenia. 
Odločba je bila vročena med njegovim obiskom v Sloveniji med 28. junijem in 2. julijem 2006.
On 17 July 2006 the applicant initiated proceedings before the Administrative Court. 
julija 2006 je pritožnik sprožil postopek pred upravnim sodiščem.
On 30 June 2006 he applied for a permanent residence permit under the Legal Status Act. 
junija 2006 je zaprosil za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje po ZUSDDD.
On 29 March 2007 a hearing was held at the Ministry. 
marca 2007 je bil zaslišan na ministrstvu.
On 14 July 2007 the applicant provided supplementary documents in support of his request. 
julija 2007 je pritožnik predložil dodatne dokumente v podporo svoji prošnji.
On 18 July 2007 the Ministry dismissed the applicant&apos;s request since he did not meet the requirement of actual residence in Slovenia. 
julija 2007 je ministrstvo zavrnilo pritožnikovo prošnjo, saj ni izpolnjeval pogoja za dejansko življenje v Sloveniji.
On 19 September 2007 the applicant initiated proceedings before the Administrative Court. 
septembra 2007 je pritožnik sprožil postopek pred upravnim sodiščem.
On 10 September 2008, in the context of administrative proceedings concerning the applicant&apos;s request for Slovenian citizenship, the Constitutional Court dismissed a constitutional complaint lodged by him. 
septembra 2008 je v upravnem postopku o pritožnikovi prošnji za slovensko državljanstvo ustavno sodišče zavrglo ustavno pritožbo, ki jo je vložil pritožnik.
On 26 November 2008 the Administrative Court quashed the Ministry&apos;s decision of 18 July 2007 (see paragraph 187 above) and sent the case back for re-examination. 
novembra 2008 je upravno sodišče zavrnilo odločbo ministrstva z dne 18. julija 2007 (glej 187. odstavek) in vrnilo zadevo v ponovno odločanje.
On 24 July 2009 the Ministry again dismissed the applicant&apos;s request since he did not meet the requirement of actually residing in Slovenia. 
julija 2009 je ministrstvo spet zavrnilo pritožnikovo prošnjo, saj ni izpolnjeval pogoja dejanskega življenja v Sloveniji.
The applicant then initiated proceedings before the Administrative Court. 
Pritožnik je nato sprožil postopek pred upravnim sodiščem.
He stated that he had been inextricably blocked in Kosovo in 1992 and had since returned to Slovenia as often as possible, but that the war and other circumstances had prevented him from doing so to any significant extent. 
Izjavil je, da je bil leta 1992 nujno zadržan na Kosovu in se je od takrat vračal v Slovenijo, kadar je bilo le mogoče, vendar so mu vojna in druge okoliščine preprečile pogosto vračanje.
Moreover, he was a Serb from Kosovo who had been granted the status of displaced person in Serbia after his house in Kosovo had been burnt down. 
Poleg tega je bil Srb s Kosova, ki mu je bil podeljen status razseljene osebe v Srbiji, ko je bila požgana njegova hiša na Kosovu.
He had tried on several occasions to regularise his status in Slovenia but had been deported in 2002. His parents, brother and two sisters were all Slovenian citizens. 
Večkrat je poskušal urediti svoj status v Sloveniji, vendar je bil leta 2002 izgnan. Njegovi starši, brat in sestra so bili vsi slovenski državljani.
On 19 January 2011 the Administrative Court quashed the decision of the Ministry and sent the case back for re-examination with an indication that his request should be dealt with under the amended Legal Status Act. 
januarja 2011 je upravno sodišče zavrnilo odločbo ministrstva in vrnilo zadevo v ponovno odločanje z navedbo, da je treba njegovo zahtevo obravnavati v skladu s spremenjenim in dopolnjenim ZUSDDD.
On 4 May 2011 the applicant was granted both ex nunc and ex tunc residence permits. 
maja 2011 sta bili pritožniku podeljeni dovoljenji za stalno prebivanje z učinkom za naprej (ex nunc) in z učinkom za nazaj (ex tunc).
They were delivered to him on 9 June 2011. 
Dovoljenji sta mu bili izročeni 9. junija 2011.
On 1 June 2011 the applicant lodged a compensation claim with the State Attorney&apos;s Office. 
junija 2011 je pritožnik vložil odškodninski zahtevek na državnem pravobranilstvu.
His claim was rejected owing to the expiry of the statutory time-limit, on the ground that he had found out about the damage caused to him by the &quot;erasure&quot; when he had applied for Slovenian citizenship or for a permanent residence permit. 
Njegov zahtevek je bil zavrnjen zaradi poteka zakonsko predpisanega roka z obrazložitvijo, da je bil seznanjen s škodo, ki mu je bila povzročena z izbrisom, ko je zaprosil za slovensko državljanstvo ali dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje.
(a) Citizenship of the Socialist Republic of Slovenia Act (Zakon o državljanstvu Socialistiène republike Slovenije - Official Gazette of the SRS, no. 23/76 of 1976) 
(a) Zakon o državljanstvu Socialistične republike Slovenije (Uradni list SRS, št.
Section 1 of this Act provided that every citizen of the Socialist Republic of Slovenia was simultaneously a citizen of the SFRY, thus establishing the primacy of republic citizenship. 
1. člen tega zakona je določal, da je vsak državljan Socialistične republike Slovenije hkrati državljan SFRJ, s čimer je bila vzpostavljena primarnost republiškega državljanstva.