natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For this purpose, he or she may seek additional information from States, organs of the United Nations, intergovernmental or non-governmental organizations, or other reliable sources that he or she deems appropriate, and may receive written or oral testimony at the seat of the Court. 
V ta namen lahko zaprosi za dodatna obvestila države, organe Združenih narodov, medvladne ali nevladne organizacije ali druge zanesljive vire, za katere meni, da so primerni, ter lahko prejme pisno ali ustno pričanje na sedežu Sodišča.
If the Prosecutor concludes that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation, he or she shall submit to the Pre-Trial Chamber a request for authorization of an investigation, together with any supporting material collected. 
Če tožilec ugotovi, da obstaja utemeljena podlaga za nadaljevanje preiskave, od predobravnavnega senata zahteva odobritev preiskave in predloži zbrano dokazno gradivo.
Victims may make representations to the Pre-Trial Chamber, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. 
V skladu s Pravili o postopku in dokazih lahko žrtve dajo izjave predobravnavnemu senatu.
If the Pre-Trial Chamber, upon examination of the request and the supporting material, considers that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation, and that the case appears to fall within the jurisdiction of the Court, it shall authorize the commencement of the investigation, without prejudice to subsequent determinations by the Court with regard to the jurisdiction and admissibility of a case. 
Če predobravnavni senat po proučitvi zahteve in dokaznega gradiva meni, da obstaja utemeljena podlaga za nadaljevanje preiskave in da bi zadeva lahko spadala v pristojnost Sodišča, odobri začetek preiskave, ne da bi to vplivalo na poznejše odločitve Sodišča v zvezi s pristojnostjo in dopustnostjo zadeve.
The refusal of the Pre-Trial Chamber to authorize the investigation shall not preclude the presentation of a subsequent request by the Prosecutor based on new facts or evidence regarding the same situation. 
Če predobravnavni senat zavrne zahtevo za odobritev preiskave, to tožilcu ne preprečuje, da bi glede iste situacije ponovno vložil zahtevo na podlagi novih dejstev ali dokazov.
If, after the preliminary examination referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Prosecutor concludes that the information provided does not constitute a reasonable basis for an investigation, he or she shall inform those who provided the information. 
Če po predhodni proučitvi, navedeni v prvem in drugem odstavku, tožilec ugotovi, da dana obvestila niso utemeljena podlaga za preiskavo, obvesti tiste, ki so jih dali.
This shall not preclude the Prosecutor from considering further information submitted to him or her regarding the same situation in the light of new facts or evidence. 
To ne preprečuje tožilcu, da bi z vidika novih dejstev ali dokazov proučil poznejša obvestila glede iste situacije.
Deferral of investigation or prosecution 
Odložitev preiskave ali pregona
No investigation or prosecution may be commenced or proceeded with under this Statute for a period of 12 months after the Security Council, in a resolution adopted under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, has requested the Court to that effect; that request may be renewed by the Council under the same conditions. 
Če Varnostni svet z resolucijo, sprejeto po VII. poglavju Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov, tako zahteva, Sodišče po tem statutu dvanajst mesecev po tej zahtevi ne sme začeti ali nadaljevati s preiskavo ali s pregonom; tako zahtevo lahko Svet obnovi pod enakimi pogoji.
Issues of admissibility 
Dopustnost
Having regard to paragraph 10 of the Preamble and article 1, the Court shall determine that a case is inadmissible where 
Ob upoštevanju desetega odstavka preambule in 1. člena Sodišče odloči, da je zadeva nedopustna, če
(a) The case is being investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution; 
(a) zadevo preiskuje ali preganja država, ki ima za ta primer jurisdikcijo, razen če ta država noče ali dejansko ne more izvesti preiskave ali pregona;
(b) The case has been investigated by a State which has jurisdiction over it and the State has decided not to prosecute the person concerned, unless the decision resulted from the unwillingness or inability of the State genuinely to prosecute; 
(b) je zadevo preiskovala država, ki ima zanjo jurisdikcijo, in se je ta država odločila, da ne bo preganjala določene osebe, razen če odločitev ni posledica nepripravljenosti ali nezmožnosti države, da bi jo dejansko preganjala;
(c) The person concerned has already been tried for conduct which is the subject of the complaint, and a trial by the Court is not permitted under article 20, paragraph 3; 
(c) so določeni osebi že sodili za ravnanje, na katero se obtožba nanaša, sojenje tega Sodišča pa ni dovoljeno po tretjem odstavku 20. člena;
(d) The case is not of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court. 
(d) teža kaznivega dejanja ne opravičuje nadaljnjega ukrepanja Sodišča.
In order to determine unwillingness in a particular case, the Court shall consider, having regard to the principles of due process recognized by international law, whether one or more of the following exist, as applicable 
Da bi lahko ugotovilo nepripravljenost v določenem primeru, Sodišče ob upoštevanju načel poštenega postopka, ki ga priznava mednarodno pravo, prouči, ali
(a) The proceedings were or are being undertaken or the national decision was made for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court referred to in article 5; 
(a) so bili postopki izvedeni ali se izvajajo ali pa je bila sprejeta državna odločitev za zavarovanje določene osebe pred kazensko odgovornostjo za kazniva dejanja v pristojnosti Sodišča, navedena v 5. členu;
(b) There has been an unjustified delay in the proceedings which in the circumstances is inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice; 
(b) je prišlo do neupravičenega odlašanja v postopkih, ki je v danih okoliščinah neskladno z namenom postaviti določeno osebo pred sodišče;
(c) The proceedings were not or are not being conducted independently or impartially, and they were or are being conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, is inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice. 
(c) postopki niso bili izvedeni ali se ne izvajajo neodvisno ali nepristransko in so se izvajali ali se izvajajo na način, ki je v danih okoliščinah neskladen z namenom postaviti določeno osebo pred sodišče.
In order to determine inability in a particular case, the Court shall consider whether, due to a total or substantial collapse or unavailability of its national judicial system, the State is unable to obtain the accused or the necessary evidence and testimony or otherwise unable to carry out its proceedings. 
Da bi ugotovilo nezmožnost države v določeni zadevi, Sodišče prouči, ali država zaradi popolnega ali znatnega razpada ali odsotnosti svojega notranjega pravosodnega sistema ne more dobiti obtoženca ali potrebnih dokazov in pričevanj ali drugače ne more izvesti postopka.
Preliminary rulings regarding admissibility 
Predhodne odločitve glede dopustnosti
When a situation has been referred to the Court pursuant to article 13 (a) and the Prosecutor has determined that there would be a reasonable basis to commence an investigation, or the Prosecutor initiates an investigation pursuant to articles 13 (c) and 15, the Prosecutor shall notify all States Parties and those States which, taking into account the information available, would normally exercise jurisdiction over the crimes concerned. 
Kadar je sodišče seznanjeno s situacijo v skladu s pododstavkom (a) 13. člena in je tožilec ugotovil, da lahko obstaja utemeljena podlaga za začetek preiskave, ali tožilec začne preiskavo v skladu s pododstavkom (c) 13. člena in 15. členom, tožilec o tem uradno obvesti vse države pogodbenice in vse tiste države, ki bi ob upoštevanju informacij, ki so na voljo, praviloma imele jurisdikcijo za določena kazniva dejanja.
The Prosecutor may notify such States on a confidential basis and, where the Prosecutor believes it necessary to protect persons, prevent destruction of evidence or prevent the absconding of persons, may limit the scope of the information provided to States. 
Tožilec lahko take države zaupno uradno obvesti in lahko omeji obseg informacij, ki jih da državam, če meni, da je to potrebno za zavarovanje oseb, preprečitev uničenja dokazov ali preprečitev pobega oseb.
Within one month of receipt of that notification, a State may inform the Court that it is investigating or has investigated its nationals or others within its jurisdiction with respect to criminal acts which may constitute crimes referred to in article 5 and which relate to the information provided in the notification to States. 
V enem mesecu od prejema takega uradnega obvestila lahko država obvesti Sodišče, da izvaja ali je izvedla preiskavo proti svojim državljanom ali drugim pod svojo jurisdikcijo v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, ki so lahko kazniva dejanja iz 5. člena in se nanašajo na informacije iz uradnega obvestila državam.
At the request of that State, the Prosecutor shall defer to the State&apos;s investigation of those persons unless the Pre-Trial Chamber, on the application of the Prosecutor, decides to authorize the investigation. 
Na zahtevo te države tožilec prepusti preiskavo proti takim osebam tej državi, razen e predobravnavni senat na zahtevo tožilca odobri preiskavo.
The Prosecutor&apos;s deferral to a State&apos;s investigation shall be open to review by the Prosecutor six months after the date of deferral or at any time when there has been a significant change of circumstances based on the State&apos;s unwillingness or inability genuinely to carry out the investigation. 
Tožilec lahko šest mesecev po dnevu prepustitve preiskave določeni državi ali kadar koli, če pride do pomembne spremembe okoliščin na podlagi nepripravljenosti ali nezmožnosti države, da bi dejansko izvedla preiskavo, prepustitev ponovno pretehta.
The State concerned or the Prosecutor may appeal to the Appeals Chamber against a ruling of the Pre-Trial Chamber, in accordance with article 82. The appeal may be heard on an expedited basis. 
Določena država ali tožilec se lahko pritožita zoper odločitev predobravnavnega senata pritožbenemu senatu v skladu z 82. členom. Pritožba se lahko obravnava po hitrem postopku.
When the Prosecutor has deferred an investigation in accordance with paragraph 2, the Prosecutor may request that the State concerned periodically inform the Prosecutor of the progress of its investigations and any subsequent prosecutions. 
Če je tožilec prepustil preiskavo v skladu z drugim odstavkom, lahko zahteva, da ga določena država redno obvešča o poteku preiskav ter o vseh poznejših pregonih.
States Parties shall respond to such requests without undue delay. 
Države pogodbenice morajo na take zahteve odgovoriti brez nepotrebnega odlašanja.
Pending a ruling by the Pre-Trial Chamber, or at any time when the Prosecutor has deferred an investigation under this article, the Prosecutor may, on an exceptional basis, seek authority from the Pre-Trial Chamber to pursue necessary investigative steps for the purpose of preserving evidence where there is a unique opportunity to obtain important evidence or there is a significant risk that such evidence may not be subsequently available. 
Do odločitve predobravnavnega senata ali kadar koli, če je tožilec prepustil preiskavo po tem členu, lahko tožilec izjemoma zaprosi predobravnavni senat za dovoljenje za izvedbo potrebnih preiskovalnih dejanj za zavarovanje dokazov, če je to enkratna možnost za pridobitev pomembnih dokazov ali če obstaja utemeljena nevarnost, da pozneje taki dokazi ne bodo na voljo.
A State which has challenged a ruling of the Pre-Trial Chamber under this article may challenge the admissibility of a case under article 19 on the grounds of additional significant facts or significant change of circumstances. 
Država, ki je spodbijala odločitev predobravnavnega senata po tem členu, lahko po 19. členu spodbija dopustnost zadeve na podlagi dodatnih pomembnih dejstev ali pomembne spremembe okoliščin.
Challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court or the admissibility of a case 
Spodbijanje pristojnosti Sodišča ali dopustnostni zadeve
The Court shall satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction in any case brought before it. 
Sodišče se prepriča o svoji pristojnosti pri vsaki zadevi, ki mu je bila predložena.
The Court may, on its own motion, determine the admissibility of a case in accordance with article 17. 
Sodišče lahko na lastno pobudo odloči o dopustnosti zadeve v skladu s 17. členom.
Challenges to the admissibility of a case on the grounds referred to in article 17 or challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court may be made by 
Dopustnost zadeve na podlagi razlogov iz 17. člena ali pristojnost Sodišča lahko spodbija
(a) An accused or a person for whom a warrant of arrest or a summons to appear has been issued under article 58; 
(a) obtoženec ali oseba, za katero je bil izdan nalog za prijetje ali poziv, da se zglasi na Sodišču po 58. členu;
(b) A State which has jurisdiction over a case, on the ground that it is investigating or prosecuting the case or has investigated or prosecuted; or 
(b) država, ki ima jurisdikcijo za zadevo, ker jo preiskuje ali izvaja kazenski pregon za zadevo ali jo je preiskovala ali preganjala, ali
(c) A State from which acceptance of jurisdiction is required under article 12. 
(c) država, katere sprejetje pristojnosti je potrebno po 12. členu.
The Prosecutor may seek a ruling from the Court regarding a question of jurisdiction or admissibility. 
Tožilec lahko zaprosi za odločitev Sodišča v zvezi z vprašanjem o pristojnosti ali dopustnosti.
In proceedings with respect to jurisdiction or admissibility, those who have referred the situation under article 13, as well as victims, may also submit observations to the Court. 
V postopkih v zvezi s pristojnostjo ali dopustnostjo lahko dajo pripombe Sodišču tudi tisti, ki so tožilca seznanili s situacijo po 13. členu, ter žrtve.
The admissibility of a case or the jurisdiction of the Court may be challenged only once by any person or State referred to in paragraph 2. The challenge shall take place prior to or at the commencement of the trial. 
Dopustnost zadeve ali pristojnost Sodišča lahko katera koli oseba ali država, navedena v drugem odstavku, spodbija samo enkrat. Spodbijanje se uveljavlja pred sojenjem ali ob njegovem začetku.
In exceptional circumstances, the Court may grant leave for a challenge to be brought more than once or at a time later than the commencement of the trial. 
V izjemnih okoliščinah lahko Sodišče dovoli, da se spodbija več kot enkrat ali po začetku sojenja.
Challenges to the admissibility of a case, at the commencement of a trial, or subsequently with the leave of the Court, may be based only on article 17, paragraph 1 (c). 
Spodbijanje dopustnosti zadeve ob začetku sojenja ali pozneje z dovoljenjem Sodišča lahko temelji le na pododstavku (c) prvega odstavka 17. člena.
A State referred to in paragraph 2 (b) and (c) shall make a challenge at the earliest opportunity. 
Država, navedena v podostavkih (b) in (c) drugega odstavka, spodbija pristojnost ali dopustnost, takoj ko je to mogoče.
Prior to the confirmation of the charges, challenges to the admissibility of a case or challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court shall be referred to the Pre-Trial Chamber. 
Pred potrditvijo obtožnice se dopustnost zadeve ali pristojnost Sodišča spodbijata pri predobravnavnem senatu.
After confirmation of the charges, they shall be referred to the Trial Chamber. 
Po potrditvi obtožnice se spodbijata pri obravnavnem senatu.
Decisions with respect to jurisdiction or admissibility may be appealed to the Appeals Chamber in accordance with article 82. 
Zoper odločbe o pristojnosti ali sprejemljivosti je možna pritožba pritožbenemu senatu v skladu z 82. členom.
If a challenge is made by a State referred to in paragraph 2 (b) or (c), the Prosecutor shall suspend the investigation until such time as the Court makes a determination in accordance with article 17. 
Če spodbija država, navedena v pododstavkih (b) ali (c) drugega odstavka, tožilec prekine preiskavo, dokler Sodišče ne sprejme odločitve v skladu s 17. členom.
Pending a ruling by the Court, the Prosecutor may seek authority from the Court 
Pred odločitvijo Sodišča lahko tožilec zaprosi Sodišče za dovoljenje, da
(a) To pursue necessary investigative steps of the kind referred to in article 18, paragraph 6; 
(a) opravi potrebna preiskovalna dejanja, navedena v šestem odstavku 18. člena
(b) To take a statement or testimony from a witness or complete the collection and examination of evidence which had begun prior to the making of the challenge; and 
(b) sprejme izjavo ali izpovedbo priče ali konča zbiranje in preverjanje dokazov, ki se je začelo pred spodbijanjem, in
(c) In cooperation with the relevant States, to prevent the absconding of persons in respect of whom the Prosecutor has already requested a warrant of arrest under article 58. 
(c) v sodelovanju z ustreznimi državami prepreči pobeg oseb, za katere je tožilec že zahteval izdajo naloga za prijetje po 58. členu.
The making of a challenge shall not affect the validity of any act performed by the Prosecutor or any order or warrant issued by the Court prior to the making of the challenge. 
Spodbijanje ne vpliva na veljavnost katerega koli dejanja tožilca, opravljenega pred spodbijanjem ali na veljavnost katere koli odredbe ali naloga Sodišča, izdanega pred spodbijanjem.
If the Court has decided that a case is inadmissible under article 17, the Prosecutor may submit a request for a review of the decision when he or she is fully satisfied that new facts have arisen which negate the basis on which the case had previously been found inadmissible under article 17. 
Če se je Sodišče odločilo, da je zadeva nedopustna po 17. členu, lahko tožilec zahteva ponovno odločanje o tem, če je popolnoma prepričan, da so se pojavila nova dejstva, ki zanikajo podlago, po kateri je bila zadeva predhodno spoznana kot nedopustna po 17. členu.
If the Prosecutor, having regard to the matters referred to in article 17, defers an investigation, the Prosecutor may request that the relevant State make available to the Prosecutor information on the proceedings. 
Če tožilec zaradi razlogov, navedenih v 17. členu, prepusti preiskavo določeni državi, lahko od nje zahteva, da mu da na voljo informacije o postopkih.
That information shall, at the request of the State concerned, be confidential. 
Na zahtevo te države so te informacije zaupne.
If the Prosecutor thereafter decides to proceed with an investigation, he or she shall notify the State to which deferral of the proceedings has taken place. 
Če se tožilec nato odloči, da bo nadaljeval preiskavo, o tem uradno obvesti to državo.
Except as provided in this Statute, no person shall be tried before the Court with respect to conduct which formed the basis of crimes for which the person has been convicted or acquitted by the Court. 
Razen če v tem statutu ni določeno drugače, se nobeni osebi ne sodi pred Sodiščem v zvezi z ravnanjem, ki je bilo podlaga kaznivih dejanj, za katere je to osebo Sodišče že obsodilo ali oprostilo.
No person shall be tried by another court for a crime referred to in article 5 for which that person has already been convicted or acquitted by the Court. 
Nobeni osebi se ne sodi pred drugim sodiščem za kaznivo dejanje, navedeno v 5. členu, za katero je Sodišče to osebo že obsodilo ali oprostilo.
No person who has been tried by another court for conduct also proscribed under article 6, 7 or 8 shall be tried by the Court with respect to the same conduct unless the proceedings in the other court 
Nobeni osebi, ki ji je sodilo drugo sodišče za ravnanje, ki je prepovedano tudi po 6., 7. ali 8. členu, ne sodi Sodišče v zvezi z istim ravnanjem, razen če
(a) Were for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court; or 
(a) so bili postopki na drugem sodišču namenjeni varovanju določene osebe pred kazensko odgovornostjo za kazniva dejanja v pristojnosti Sodišča ali
(b) Otherwise were not conducted independently or impartially in accordance with the norms of due process recognized by international law and were conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, was inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice. 
(b) postopki na drugem sodišču niso bili kako drugače izvedeni neodvisno ali nepristransko v skladu z normami poštenega postopka, ki jih priznava mednarodno pravo, in so bili izvedeni na način, ki je bil glede na okoliščine neskladen z namenom pripeljati določeno osebo pred sodišče.
Applicable law 
Uporabno pravo
The Court shall apply: (a) In the first place, this Statute, Elements of Crimes and its Rules of Procedure and Evidence; 
Sodišče uporablja: (a) predvsem ta statut, Znake kaznivih dejanj ter svoja Pravila o postopku in dokazih
(b) In the second place, where appropriate, applicable treaties and the principles and rules of international law, including the established principles of the international law of armed conflict; 
(b) pa tudi, če je primerno, uporabne mednarodne pogodbe ter načela in pravila mednarodnega prava, vključno z veljavnimi načeli in pravili mednarodnega prava oboroženih spopadov
(c) Failing that, general principles of law derived by the Court from national laws of legal systems of the world including, as appropriate, the national laws of States that would normally exercise jurisdiction over the crime, provided that those principles are not inconsistent with this Statute and with international law and internationally recognized norms and standards. 
(c) če to ne zadošča, splošna pravna načela, ki jih Sodišče izvede iz notranjih zakonodaj pravnih sistemov sveta, vključno, kadar je to primerno, z notranjim pravom držav, ki bi praviloma izvajale jurisdikcijo za kaznivo dejanje, če ta načela niso neskladna s tem statutom, ter z veljavnim mednarodnim pravom in mednarodno priznanimi normami in standardi.
The Court may apply principles and rules of law as interpreted in its previous decisions. 
Sodišče lahko uporablja pravna načela in pravila v skladu z razlago v svojih prejšnjih odločitvah.
The application and interpretation of law pursuant to this article must be consistent with internationally recognized human rights, and be without any adverse distinction founded on grounds such as gender as defined in article 7, paragraph 3, age, race, colour, language, religion or belief, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, wealth, birth or other status. 
Uporaba in razlaga prava v skladu s tem členom morata biti skladni z mednarodno priznanimi človekovimi pravicami ter brez kakršnega koli razlikovanja na podlagi spola, kot je opredeljen v tretjem odstavku 7. člena, starosti, rase, barve, jezika, vere ali prepričanja, političnega ali drugega mnenja, narodnosti, etničnega ali socialnega izvora, gmotnega stanja, rojstva ali drugega stanja.
General Principles of Criminal Law 
Splošna načela kazenskega prava
A person shall not be criminally responsible under this Statute unless the conduct in question constitutes, at the time it takes place, a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court. 
Oseba ni kazensko odgovorna po tem statutu, razen če določeno ravnanje, ko je storjeno, predstavlja kaznivo dejanje v pristojnosti Sodišča.
The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. 
Znake kaznivega dejanja je treba razlagati ozko in jih ne širiti z analogijo.
In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted. 
V dvomu jih je treba razlagati v korist osebe, proti kateri poteka preiskava, ki se preganja ali obsodi.