natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nor should he carry out any body searches or examinations requested by an authority, except in an emergency when no other doctor can be called in. 
Prav tako ne bi smel na zahtevo pristojnih organov izvajati telesnih preiskav ali pregledov, razen izjemoma, kadar ni mogoče poklicati drugega zdravnika.
It should also be noted that a prison doctor&apos;s professional freedom is limited by the prison situation itself: he cannot freely choose his patients, as the prisoners have no other medical option at their disposal. 
Potrebno je tudi opozoriti, da je poklicna svoboda zdravnika v zaporu omejena. Ne sme npr. svobodno izbirati pacientov, saj zaporniki nimajo na voljo nobene druge izbire.
His professional duty still exists even if the patient breaks the medical rules or resorts to threats or violence. 
Njegova poklicna dolžnost obstaja tudi, če pacient prekrši medicinska pravila ali se zateče h grožnjam ali nasilju.
Professionalism 
Strokovnost
Prison doctors and nurses should possess specialist knowledge enabling them to deal with the particular forms of prison pathology and adapt their treatment methods to the conditions imposed by detention. 
Zdravniki v zaporu in medicinske sestre oz. medicinski tehniki bi morali posedovati posebna znanja, ki bi jim omogočala soočanje z določenimi oblikami zaporniške patologije in prilagoditev metod zdravljenja pogojem, ki jih predstavlja zapor.
In particular, professional attitudes designed to prevent violence - and, where appropriate, control it - should be developed. 
Poseben poudarek bi moral biti na razvoju strokovnih pristopov usmerjenih v preprečevanje in če je potrebno omejevanje nasilja.
To ensure the presence of an adequate number of staff, nurses are frequently assisted by medical orderlies, some of whom are recruited from among the prison officers. 
Da bi se zagotovilo primerno število osebja, medicinskim sestram pogosto pomaga pomožno osebje, med katerim so nekateri izbrani izmed paznikov v zaporu.
At the various levels, the necessary experience should be passed on by the qualified staff and periodically updated. 
Osebje na različnih stopnjah bi moralo izmenjavati in dopolnjevati potrebne izkušnje.
Sometimes prisoners themselves are allowed to act as medical orderlies. 
Včasih je tudi zapornikom dovoljeno, da delajo kot pomožno osebje v zdravstveni službi.
No doubt, such an approach can have the advantage of providing a certain number of prisoners with a useful job. 
Brez dvoma je prednost tovrstnega pristopa ta, da zagotavlja določenemu številu zapornikov koristno delo.
Nevertheless, it should be seen as a last resort. 
Kljub temu bi moral biti tovrsten pristop uporabljen kot skrajni izhod.
Further, prisoners should never be involved in the distribution of medicines. 
Nikakor pa zaporniki ne bi smeli biti vključeni v razdeljevanje zdravil.
Finally, the CPT would suggest that the specific features of the provision of health care in a prison environment may justify the introduction of a recognised professional speciality, both for doctors and for nurses, on the basis of postgraduate training and regular in-service training. 
Na CPT dodal, da bi specifična narava izvajanja zdravstvene oskrbe v zaporu opravičevala oblikovanje posebne strokovne specializacije, tako za zdravnike kot tudi za medicinske sestre oz. medicinske tehnike, na ravni podiplomskega študija in rednega praktičnega usposabljanja.
V. Foreign nationals detained under aliens legislation 
V. Tuji državljani pridržani po zakonodaji o tujcih
A. Preliminary remarks 
A. Uvodne pripombe
CPT visiting delegations frequently encounter foreign nationals deprived of their liberty under aliens legislation (hereafter &quot;immigration detainees&quot;) 
Delegacije CPT-ja pri svojih obiskih pogosto naletijo na tuje državljane, ki jim je odvzeta prostost na podlagi zakonodaje o tujcih
persons refused entry to the country concerned; persons who have entered the country illegally and have subsequently been identified by the authorities; persons whose authorisation to stay in the country has expired; asylum-seekers whose detention is considered necessary by the authorities; etc. 
osebe, ki jim je bil zavrnjen vstop v državo; osebe, ki so ilegalno vstopile v državo in so bile nato s strani oblasti prijete; osebe, ki jim je poteklo dovoljenje za bivanje v državi; prosilci za azil, za katere oblasti menijo, da jim je nujno omejiti svobodo gibanja itd..
In the following paragraphs, some of the main issues pursued by the CPT in relation to such persons are described. 
V naslednjih odstavkih so opisana nekatera temeljna vprašanja, s katerimi se glede omenjenih oseb ukvarja CPT.
The CPT hopes in this way to give a clear advance indication to national authorities of its views concerning the treatment of immigration detainees and, more generally, to stimulate discussion in relation to this category of persons deprived of their liberty. 
Na ta način želi Odbor nacionalnim oblastem vnaprej posredovati jasno sporočilo o svojih pogledih glede vprašanj, povezanih s pridržanimi tujci. Hkrati pa želi spodbuditi razpravo v zvezi s to kategorijo oseb, ki jim je odvzeta prostost.
the Committee would welcome comments on this section of its General Report. 
Odbor bo pozdravil vsak predlog ali komentar k temu delu splošnega poročila.
B. Detention facilities 
B. Prostori za pridržanje
CPT visiting delegations have met immigration detainees in a variety of custodial settings, ranging from holding facilities at points of entry to police stations, prisons and specialised detention centres. 
Delegacije CPT-ja so med obiski naletele na tujce, pridržane v različnih prostorih za pridržanje; od čakalnic na mejah do policijskih postaj, zaporov in specializiranih centrov za pridržanje.
As regards more particularly transit and &quot;international&quot; zones at airports, the precise legal position of persons refused entry to a country and placed in such zones has been the subject of some controversy. 
Poseben problem in konflikt mnenj se je pojavil glede oseb, ki jim je bil zavrnjen vstop v državo in so bile nameščene v prehodnih in mednarodnih območjih na letališčih.
On more than one occasion, the CPT has been confronted with the argument that such persons are not &quot;deprived of their liberty&quot; as they are free to leave the zone at any moment by taking any international flight of their choice. 
V več primerih je bilo CPT-ju pojasnjeno, da tem osebam pravzaprav ni odvzeta prostost, saj lahko s svobodno izbiro mednarodnega leta kadarkoli zapustijo to območje.
For its part, the CPT has always maintained that a stay in a transit or &quot;international&quot; zone can, depending on the circumstances, amount to a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5 (1)(f) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and that consequently such zones fall within the Committee&apos;s mandate. 
CPT je na to odgovarjal, da lahko tudi bivanje v prehodnih ali mednarodnih območjih, odvisno od okoliščin, privede do omejitve prostosti v smislu f. točke 1. odstavka 5. člena Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah. Zato je tudi pregled takih območij v pristojnosti Odbora.
The judgement delivered on 25 June 1996 by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Amuur against France can be considered as vindicating this view. 
Kot potrditev tega stališča lahko navedemo sodbo Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice z dne 25.6.1996, v zadevi Amuur proti Franciji.
In that case, which concerned four asylum seekers held in the transit zone at Paris-Orly Airport for 20 days, the Court stated that &quot;The mere fact that it is possible for asylum seekers to leave voluntarily the country where they wish to take refuge cannot exclude a restriction (&quot;atteinte&quot;) on liberty....&quot; and held that &quot;holding the applicants in the transit zone.... was equivalent in practice, in view of the restrictions suffered, to a deprivation of liberty&quot;. 
V tej zadevi, v kateri gre za štiri prosilce za azil, ki so se 20 dni nahajali v prehodnem območju na letališču Paris-Orly, je Sodišče odločilo, da »zgolj dejstvo, da lahko prosilci za azil prostovoljno zapustijo državo, v kateri iščejo zatočišče, ne more izključiti dejstva, da jim je omejena svoboda gibanja …« in da »je zadrževanje pritožnikov v prehodnem območju glede na omejitve, ki so jim bili podvrženi, … praktično enakovredno omejitvi svobode gibanja.«
Point of entry holding facilities have often been found to be inadequate, in particular for extended stays. 
CPT je pogosto ugotovil, da so čakalni prostori na meji neprimerni, še posebej za daljše bivanje.
More specifically, CPT delegations have on several occasions met persons held for days under makeshift conditions in airport lounges. 
Delegacije CPT-ja so večkrat naletele na ljudi, ki so več dni bivali v začasnih razmerah kar v različnih čakalnicah na letališču.
It is axiomatic that such persons should be provided with suitable means for sleeping, granted access to their luggage and to suitably-equipped sanitary and washing facilities, and allowed to exercise in the open air on a daily basis. 
Nujno je, da se tem osebam preskrbijo primerna sredstva za spanje, omogoči dostop do njihove prtljage ter do primerno opremljenih toaletnih prostorov in umivalnice ter da jim je dovoljeno vsakodnevno gibanje na prostem.
Further, access to food and, if necessary, medical care should be guaranteed. 
Nadalje bi jim moral biti zagotovljen dostop do hrane in, če je to potrebno, do zdravstvene oskrbe.
In certain countries, CPT delegations have found immigration detainees held in police stations for prolonged periods (for weeks and, in certain cases, months), subject to mediocre material conditions of detention, deprived of any form of activity and on occasion obliged to share cells with criminal suspects. 
V nekaterih država so delegacije CPT-ja naletele na pridržane tujce, ki so bili daljše obdobje zadržani na policijskih postajah (tedne in v določenih primerih celo mesece) in podvrženi nemogočim materialnim pogojem bivanja; onemogočena jim je bila vsaka oblika aktivnosti, občasno so bili prisiljeni deliti celice z osumljenci kaznivih dejanj.
Such a situation is indefensible. 
Za takšne primere ni opravičila.
The CPT recognises that, in the very nature of things, immigration detainees may have to spend some time in an ordinary police detention facility. 
CPT priznava, da se po naravi stvari lahko zgodi, da morajo pridržani tujci preživeti nekaj časa tudi v policijskih prostorih.
However, conditions in police stations will frequently - if not invariably - be inadequate for prolonged periods of detention. 
Vendar pa so pogoji na policijskih postajah pogosto - če ne kar praviloma - neprimerni za daljše bivanje.
Consequently, the period of time spent by immigration detainees in such establishments should be kept to the absolute minimum. 
Zato mora biti čas, ki ga v teh prostorih preživijo pridržani tujci skrajšan na absolutni minimum.
On occasion, CPT delegations have found immigration detainees held in prisons. 
V določenih primerih so delegacije CPT-ja naletele na pridržane tujce v zaporih.
Even if the actual conditions of detention for these persons in the establishments concerned are adequate -which has not always been the case - the CPT considers such an approach to be fundamentally flawed. 
Četudi so dejanski pogoji bivanja teh oseb v zaporu primerni - kar ni vedno držalo - CPT meni, da je tovrsten pristop v osnovi napačen.
A prison is by definition not a suitable place in which to detain someone who is neither convicted nor suspected of a criminal offence. 
Zapor namreč že po definiciji ni primeren prostor za bivanje osebe, ki ni niti obsojena niti osumljena kaznivega dejanja.
Admittedly, in certain exceptional cases, it might be appropriate to hold an immigration detainee in a prison, because of a known potential for violence. 
CPT priznava, da je v nekaterih izjemnih primerih lahko primerno zadrževanje tujca, ki mu je odvzeta prostost, tudi v zaporu, npr. zaradi njegovega nagnjenja k nasilju.
Further, an immigration detainee in need of in-patient treatment might have to be accommodated temporarily in a prison health-care facility, in the event of no other secure hospital facility being available. 
Lahko se zgodi, da bo tujec, ki mu je odvzeta prostost in je potreben bolnišnične nege, začasno moral biti hospitaliziran v zdravstvenem oddelku zapora, če ni na voljo druge varne bolnišnične nastanitve.
However, such detainees should be held quite separately from prisoners, whether on remand or convicted. 
Ne glede na to, pa bi morale biti tako pridržane osebe nastanjene ločeno od zapornikov in pripornikov.
In the view of the CPT, in those cases where it is deemed necessary to deprive persons of their liberty for an extended period under aliens legislation, they should be accommodated in centres specifically designed for that purpose, offering material conditions and a regime appropriate to their legal situation and staffed by suitably-qualified personnel. 
Po mnenju CPT-ja je v primerih, ko je potrebno po zakonodaji o tujcih osebi nujno omejiti prostost za daljši čas, te osebe potrebno nastaniti v centrih zasnovanih prav v ta namen. Taki centri morajo nuditi ustrezne materialne pogoje in hišni red, primeren pravnem položaju pridržanih tujcev, v njih pa mora biti zaposleno primerno kvalificirano osebje.
The Committee is pleased to note that such an approach is increasingly being followed in Parties to the Convention. 
Odbor z veseljem ugotavlja, da tovrsten pristop uporablja vedno več držav članic Konvencije.
Obviously, such centres should provide accommodation which is adequately-furnished, clean and in a good state of repair, and which offers sufficient living space for the numbers involved. 
Očitno je, da bi morali tovrstni centri zagotavljati primerno opremljene in čiste prostore, ki nudijo dovolj življenjskega prostora za število ljudi, ki so v njih nastanjeni.
Further, care should be taken in the design and layout of the premises to avoid as far as possible any impression of a carceral environment. 
Nadalje, posebna pozornost bi morala biti posvečena zasnovi in načrtovanju tovrstnih centrov, pri čemer se je potrebno izogibati vtisu prisilnega okolja.
As regards regime activities, they should include outdoor exercise, access to a day room and to radio/television and newspapers/magazines, as well as other appropriate means of recreation (e.g. board games, table tennis). 
Organizirane aktivnosti bi morale vključevati zunanje aktivnosti, dostop do dnevne sobe, do radia in televizije, do časopisov in revij ter tudi druga primerna sredstva za rekreacijo (npr. razne igre, namizni tenis).
The longer the period for which persons are detained, the more developed should be the activities which are offered to them. 
Daljše kot je obdobje, v katerem je osebam omejena prostost, večji bi moral biti spekter aktivnosti, ki so na voljo tem osebam.
The staff of centres for immigration detainees have a particularly onerous task. 
Osebje centrov za tujce, ki jim je omejena prostost, ima posebej zahtevno nalogo.
Firstly, there will inevitably be communication difficulties caused by language barriers. 
Prvič, zaradi jezikovnih ovir bodo nedvomno soočeni s problemi pri komuniciranju.
Secondly, many detained persons will find the fact that they have been deprived of their liberty when they are not suspected of any criminal offence difficult to accept. 
Drugič, veliko tujcev, ki jim je bila omejena prostost, čeprav niso osumljeni nikakršnega kaznivega dejanja, to dejstvo težko sprejmejo.
Thirdly, there is a risk of tension between detainees of different nationalities or ethnic groups. 
Tretjič, obstaja tveganje napetosti med tujci različnih narodnosti in etičnih skupin.
Consequently, the CPT places a premium upon the supervisory staff in such centres being carefully selected and receiving appropriate training. 
Zato CPT poudarja pomen dejstva, da do uslužbenci v takšnih centrih pazljivo izbrani in primerno izobraženi ter usposobljeni.
As well as possessing well-developed qualities in the field of interpersonal communication, the staff concerned should be familiarised with the different cultures of the detainees and at least some of them should have relevant language skills. 
Prav tako je pomembno, da imajo dobro razvite sposobnosti med-osebne komunikacije ter da so seznanjeni z različnimi kulturami, vsaj nekaj pa bi jih moralo imeti tudi potrebno znanje tujih jezikov.
Further, they should be taught to recognise possible symptoms of stress reactions displayed by detained persons (whether post-traumatic or induced by socio-cultural changes) and to take appropriate action. 
Nadalje bi morali biti uslužbenci tovrstnih centrov usposobljeni za prepoznavanje morebitnih simptomov stresnih reakcij pridržanih tujcev, (npr. post-travmatični stres, stres zaradi družbenih in kulturnih sprememb) ter znati primerno ukrepati v takih primerih.
Safeguards during detention 
Varovala glede pridržanja tujcev
Immigration detainees should - in the same way as other categories of persons deprived of their liberty - be entitled, as from the outset of their detention, to inform a person of their choice of their situation and to have access to a lawyer and a doctor. 
Pridržani tujci bi morali imeti enako kot ostale kategorije oseb, ki jim je odvzeta prostost, že od samega začetka pravico, da o prijetju obvestijo osebo po lastni izbiri ter da imajo dostop do odvetnika in zdravnika.
Further, they should be expressly informed, without delay and in a language they understand, of all their rights and of the procedure applicable to them. 
Nadalje bi morali biti takoj in brez odlašanja, v jeziku, ki ga razumejo, obveščeni o vseh njihovih pravicah in o postopku, po katerem bodo obravnavani.
The CPT has observed that these requirements are met in some countries, but not in others. 
CPT je opazil, da določene države tem zahtevam zadostijo, določene pa ne.
In particular, visiting delegations have on many occasions met immigration detainees who manifestly had not been fully informed in a language they understood of their legal position. 
Delegacije CPT-ja so med obiski pogosto naletele na tujce, ki jim je bila omejena svoboda gibanja, vendar očitno niso bili polno obveščeni o njihovem pravnem položaju v jeziku, ki ga razumejo.
In order to overcome such difficulties, immigration detainees should be systematically provided with a document explaining the procedure applicable to them and setting out their rights. 
Da bi prešli tovrstne težave, bi morali tujcem, ki jim je odvzeta prostost, sistematično izročati pisno obvestilo, v katerem bi jim razložili postopek, po katerem bodo obravnavani in jih poučili o njihovih pravicah.
This document should be available in the languages most commonly spoken by those concerned and, if necessary, recourse should be had to the services of an interpreter. 
To obvestilo bi moral biti na voljo v jezikih, ki jih najpogosteje govorijo tisti, na katere se nanaša; če je potrebno pa bi moral biti na voljo tudi prevajalec.
The right of access to a lawyer should apply throughout the detention period and include both the right to speak with the lawyer in private and to have him present during interviews with the authorities concerned. 
Pravica dostopa do odvetnika bi se morala nanašati na celotno obdobje omejitve prostosti in bi morala vključevati pravico do zaupnega pogovora z odvetnikom in pravico, da je odvetnik prisoten na zaslišanjih tujca s strani pristojnih organov.
All detention facilities for immigration detainees should provide access to medical care. 
Vsi prostori, v katerih bivajo tujci, ki jim je omejena prostost, bi morali imeti zagotovljen dostop do zdravstvene oskrbe.
Particular attention should be paid to the physical and psychological state of asylum seekers, some of whom may have been tortured or otherwise ill-treated in the countries from which they have come. 
Posebno pozornost bi bilo potrebno posvečati fizičnemu in psihičnemu stanju prosilcev za azil, med katerimi so lahko tudi osebe, ki so bile v državah, iz katerih prihajajo, podvržene mučenju ali drugemu slabemu ravnanju.
The right of access to a doctor should include the right - if a detainee so wishes - to be examined by a doctor of his choice; however, the detainee might be expected to cover the cost of such a second examination. 
Pravica dostopa do zdravnika bi morala na željo tujca, ki mu je omejena prostost, vsebovati tudi pravico, da ga pregleda zdravnik po njegovi izbiri. Vendar pa je mogoče, da mora tujec v tem primeru sam kriti stroške pregleda s strani zdravnika po lastni izbiri.
More generally, immigration detainees should be entitled to maintain contact with the outside world during their detention, and in particular to have access to a telephone and to receive visits from relatives and representatives of relevant organisations. 
Tujcem, ki jim je omejena prostost, mora biti omogočeno, da med omejitvijo prostosti vzdržujejo stike z zunanjim svetom, da imajo dostop do telefona ter da lahko sprejemajo obiske sorodnikov in predstavnikov različnih organizacij.
The prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment englobes the obligation not to send a person to a country where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would run a real risk of being subjected to torture or ill-treatment. 
Prepoved mučenja in nehumanega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja vsebuje tudi obveznost države, da tujca ne vrne v državo, v kateri obstaja velika verjetnost, da bo podvržen mučenju ali slabemu ravnanju.
Whether Parties to the Convention are fulfilling this obligation is obviously a matter of considerable interest to the CPT. 
CPT namenja veliko pozornost vprašanju ali države članice Konvencije to obveznost izpolnjujejo.
What is the precise role that the Committee should seek to play in relation to that question 
Kakšna je neposredna vloga Odbora glede tega vprašanja
Any communications addressed to the CPT in Strasbourg by persons alleging that they are to be sent to a country where they run a risk of being subjected to torture or ill-treatment are immediately brought to the attention of the European Commission of Human Rights. 
Vsaka pisanja in sporočila naslovljena na CPT v Strasbourg s strani ljudi, ki trdijo, da bodo vrnjeni v državo, v kateri obstaja verjetnost, da bodo podvrženi mučenju ali bo slabemu ravnanju, CPT nemudoma posreduje Evropski komisiji za človekove pravice.
The Commission is better placed than the CPT to examine such allegations and, if appropriate, take preventive action. 
Komisija ima boljše možnosti kot CPT, da preveri te trditve in če je potrebno tudi preventivno ukrepa.
If an immigration detainee (or any other person deprived of his liberty) interviewed in the course of a visit alleges that he is to be sent to a country where he runs a risk of being subjected to torture or ill-treatment, the CPT&apos;s visiting delegation will verify that this assertion has been brought to the attention of the relevant national authorities and is being given due consideration. 
Če tujec, ki mu je omejena prostost (ali katerakoli druga oseba, ki ji je odvzeta prostost), med razgovorom s člani delegacije Odbora trdi, da bo vrnjen v državo, v kateri obstaja tveganje, da bo podvržen mučenju in slabemu ravnanju, delegacija najprej preveri ali so bile te trditve posredovane pristojnim nacionalnim oblastem in ustrezno obravnavane.
Depending on the circumstances, the delegation might request to be kept informed of the detainee&apos;s position and/or inform the detainee of the possibility of raising the issue with the European Commission of Human Rights (and, in the latter case, verify that he is in a position to submit a petition to the Commission). 
Odvisno od okoliščin lahko delegacija zahteva, da jo obveščajo o položaju tujca, ki mu je omejena prostost in/ali obvestijo tujca, ki mu je omejena prostost o možnosti reševanja njegovega problema pred Evropsko komisijo za človekove pravice (v slednjem primeru nato delegacija preveri, če ima tujec možnost predložiti in predstaviti svojo trditev Komisiji).