natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Preparedness combines the individual knowledge and skills of a mediator with a cohesive team of specialists as well as the necessary political, financial and administrative support from the mediating entity. 
Pripravljenost je kombinacija znanja in veščin mediatorja, povezanosti in usklajenosti njegove skupine izvedencev ter ustrezne politične, finančne in administrativne podpore mediatorskega subjekta.
While not predetermining the outcome, preparedness entails the development of strategies for different phases (such as pre-negotiations, negotiations and implementation), based on comprehensive conflict analysis and stakeholder mapping, including examination of previous mediation initiatives. 
Brez določanja dosežka vnaprej je treba za dobro pripravljenost razviti strategije za različne faze postopka (pred pogajanji, pogajanja in izvajanje), ki temeljijo na obsežni analizi konflikta in seznama ter značilnosti udeležencev, pri čemer se preučijo tudi predhodne pobude za mediacijo.
Since a mediation process is never linear and not all elements can be fully controlled, strategies need to be flexible to respond to the changing context. 
Ker postopek mediacije ni nikoli premočrten in ker vseh elementov ni mogoče popolnoma nadzorovati, morajo biti strategije prilagodljive, da se lahko ustrezno prilagajajo spreminjajočim se okoliščinam.
Preparedness allows the mediator to guide and monitor the mediation process, help strengthen (where necessary) the negotiating capacity of the conflict parties and other stakeholders, assist them in reaching agreements, and galvanize support (including among international actors) for implementation. 
Pripravljenost mediatorju omogoča, da vodi in nadzoruje postopek mediacije, da po potrebi pomaga okrepiti pogajalske sposobnosti strani v sporu in drugih udeležencev, da jim pomaga pri doseganju sporazuma in da pridobi podporo (tudi mednarodnih akterjev) za izvajanje.
A well-prepared and supported mediator is able to manage expectations, maintain a sense of urgency while avoiding quick-fix solutions, and effectively respond to opportunities and challenges in the overall process. 
Mediator, ki je dobro pripravljen in uživa ustrezno podporo, je sposoben obvladovati pričakovanja, ohranjati občutek nujnosti ob istočasnem izogibanju prenagljenim rešitvam ter se učinkovito odzivati na priložnosti in izzive v postopku.
Preparedness is first and foremost the responsibility of States or organizations seeking to play a mediating role. 
Za pripravljenost morajo poskrbeti predvsem države ali organizacije, ki si prizadevajo pridobiti vlogo mediatorja.
These entities should be ready to: 
Ti subjekti morajo biti pripravljeni:
Commit resources to respond rapidly and to sustain support for the mediation process, including deployment of personnel on a continuous basis for medium- and long- term engagements. 
nameniti sredstva za hiter odziv in vzdrževanje podpore mediaciji, vključno z napotitvijo osebja na srednje- in dolgoročne naloge;
Select a competent mediator with the experience, skills, knowledge and cultural sensitivity for the specific conflict situation. 
izbrati primernega mediatorja z izkušnjami, veščinami, znanjem in občutkom za kulturne posebnosti v posameznih konfliktnih razmerah.
The mediator should be considered objective, impartial and authoritative and be a person of integrity. 
Biti mora objektiven, nepristranski, odločen in imeti integriteto.
The mediator needs a level of seniority and gravitas commensurate to the conflict context and must be acceptable to the parties. 
Imeti mora ustrezen položaj in ugled, primerna okviru spora, ter biti sprejemljiv za vse strani v sporu.
Some disputes require discreet engagement, whereas others need more high-profile initiatives. 
Nekateri spori zahtevajo diskretnejšo obravnavo, drugi pa vidnejše pobude;
Undertake conflict analysis and regular internal assessments of the process in order to make adjustments to the mediation strategies as needed. 
izvesti analizo spora in opraviti redne notranje ocene postopka za prilagoditev mediacijskih strategij, kadar je to potrebno;
Provide proper preparation, induction and training for mediators and their teams. 
zagotoviti ustrezno pripravo, uvajanje in usposabljanje mediatorjev in njihovih strokovnih skupin.
All team members should understand the gender dimension in their respective areas of expertise. 
Vsi člani skupine se morajo zavedati vidika enakosti spolov na svojem strokovnem področju;
Include a balance of men and women on mediation teams. 
zagotoviti enakopravno zastopanost moških in žensk v mediatorskih skupinah.
This also sends a positive signal to the parties with regard to the composition of their delegations. 
To je istočasno spodbudno sporočilo stranem v sporu glede sestave njihovih delegacij.
Mediation is a voluntary process that requires the consent of the conflict parties to be effective. 
Mediacija je prostovoljni postopek, katerega učinkovitost je odvisna od privolitve strani v sporu.
Without consent it is unlikely that parties will negotiate in good faith or be committed to the mediation process. 
Brez soglasja je malo verjetno, da se bodo strani pogajale v dobri veri ali da bodo predane postopku mediacije.
A range of issues can affect whether conflict parties consent to mediation. 
Na njihovo privolitev v mediacijo lahko vplivajo številni dejavniki.
The integrity of the mediation process, security and confidentiality are important elements in cultivating the consent of the parties, along with the acceptability of the mediator and the mediating entity. 
Pri doseganju soglasja sprtih strani so pomembne integriteta postopka mediacije, zanesljivost in zaupnost, skupaj s sprejemljivostjo mediatorja in organizacije oz. subjekta, ki ima vlogo mediatorja.
However, the dynamics of the conflict are a determining factor, and whether parties consent to mediation may be shaped by an interest to achieve political goals through military means, by political, ideological or psychological considerations, or by the actions of external players. 
Toda odločilni dejavnik je dinamika spora, na pridobitev soglasja za mediacijo pa lahko vplivajo tudi interes za uresničevanje političnih ciljev z vojaškimi sredstvi, politični, ideološki in psihološki dejavniki ali dejanja zunanjih akterjev.
In some instances, parties may also reject mediation initiatives because they do not understand mediation and perceive it as a threat to sovereignty or outside interference. 
V nekaterih primerih se lahko zgodi, da strani v sporu zavrnejo pobudo za mediacijo, ker je ne razumejo in jo dojemajo kot nevarnost za suverenost ali kot zunanje vmešavanje.
In a multi-actor conflict, some, but not all, conflict parties may agree to the mediation, leaving a mediator with the difficult situation of partial consent to commence a mediation process. 
V sporu z več akterji se lahko zgodi, da se le nekatere strani strinjajo z mediacijo, tako da se lahko mediator znajde v zagati, ker obstaja le delno soglasje za začetek postopka mediacije.
Moreover, even where consent is given, it may not always translate into full commitment to the mediation process. 
Zavedati pa se je treba, da soglasje ne pomeni nujno popolne zavezanosti mediaciji.
Consent may sometimes be given incrementally, limited at first to the discussion of specific issues before accepting a more comprehensive mediation process. 
Doseganje soglasja je lahko tudi postopno - v začetku omejeno na pogovore o posameznih vprašanjih, v poznejši fazi pa sodelujoča stran privoli v bolj vsestransko mediacijo.
Consent may be conveyed explicitly or more informally (through back channels). 
Soglasje je lahko dano izrecno ali neformalno (po neuradni poti).
Tentative expressions of consent may become more explicit as confidence in the process increases. 
Načelno soglašanje lahko postane bolj izrecno, ko se zaupanje v postopek poveča.
Once given, consent may later be withdrawn, especially when there are differences within a party. 
Tudi če je soglasje že dano, se lahko pozneje umakne, zlasti ob morebitnih notranjih nesoglasjih pri eni strani v sporu.
Armed or political groups may splinter, creating new pressures on the negotiations process. 
Oborožene ali politične skupine se namreč lahko razdelijo, kar ustvari nove pritiske na pogajalski postopek.
Some splinter groups may pull out of the mediation all together and seek to derail the process. 
Nekatere odcepljene skupine lahko popolnoma prenehajo sodelovati v mediaciji in jo poskušajo onemogočiti.
Mediators need to create a common understanding with the conflict parties on the mediator&apos;s role and the ground rules of the mediation. 
Mediatorji morajo s stranmi v sporu doseči dogovor o svojih nalogah in osnovnih pravilih mediacije.
This understanding may be affected by formal mandates for the potential mediation effort or by informal arrangements with the parties. 
Na ta dogovor lahko vplivajo uradni mandat za morebitno mediacijo ali neformalni dogovori s stranmi v sporu.
Based on this, mediators need to: 
Na podlagi tega morajo mediatorji:
Understand whose consent is necessary for a viable mediation process to start. 
vedeti, čigavo soglasje je potrebno za začetek uspešnega postopka mediacije.
If only some of the conflict parties have agreed to the mediation, the mediator may need to engage with the consenting parties and gradually expand the consent base. 
Če se z njo strinja zgolj nekaj sprtih strani, mora mediator najprej sodelovati z njimi in počasi doseči še privolitev preostalih.
Such a judgement of &quot;sufficient consent&quot; should be based on an analysis of the different constituencies and an assessment of the possible impact of an initially limited mediation process, as well as the potential for excluded parties to derail the process. 
Pri presojanju, ali je soglasje zadostno, mora upoštevati analizo vpletenih skupin, oceno morebitnih posledic sprva omejenega postopka mediacije in tudi možnost, da bi se skupine v okviru ene strani odcepile in ovirale postopek;
Cultivate consent, in order to create the space for, and a good understanding of, mediation. 
krepiti soglasje, zato da se ustvari prostor za mediacijo in zagotovi razumevanje, kaj mediacija je.
Informal contacts allow parties to test the waters without committing to a fully fledged mediation process; this can help address possible fears or insecurities. 
Z neformalnimi stiki lahko strani v sporu dobijo predstavo o postopku, ne da bi se takoj zavezale k mediaciji; to lahko pomaga premagati morebitne strahove in negotovost;
Engage with local and community-based actors or organizations, including women&apos;s groups, as well as external actors with access to and relationships with conflict parties to encourage the use of mediation. 
sodelovati z akterji in organizacijami na lokalni ravni, med drugim ženskimi združenji, pa tudi z zunanjimi akterji, ki imajo dostop do sprtih strani in stike z njimi, zato da pomagajo pri spodbujanju k uporabi mediacije;
Use confidence-building measures at different stages to build trust between the conflict parties and between the mediator and the parties, as well as confidence in the mediation process. 
v različnih fazah uporabiti ukrepe za vzpostavitev in krepitev zaupanja med sprtimi stranmi, med njimi in mediatorjem, pa tudi zaupanja v sam postopek mediacije;
Be consistent, transparent and even-handed in managing the mediation process, and respect confidentiality. 
biti dosledni, odkriti in nepristranski pri vodenju postopka mediacije ter spoštovati zaupnost;
Periodically assess whether the process has sufficient consent and be prepared for fluxes in consent throughout the mediation, working to bring the conflict parties back into the process and drawing on the influence of their backers or other third parties as appropriate. 
redno presojati, ali se sprte strani s postopkom strinjajo, in biti pripravljeni na nihanja v soglasju med samo mediacijo, si prizadevati, da se sprte strani vrnejo k postopku, ter po potrebi izkoristiti vpliv podpornikov in tretjih strani.
Impartiality is a cornerstone of mediation - if a mediation process is perceived to be biased, this can undermine meaningful progress to resolve the conflict. 
Nepristranskost je glavni temelj mediacije - če je postopek mediacije viden kot pristranski, to lahko ogrozi napredek pri reševanju spora.
A mediator should be able to run a balanced process that treats all actors fairly and should not have a material interest in the outcome. 
Mediator mora biti sposoben voditi uravnotežen postopek, ki vse akterje obravnava pravično, in si ne sme prizadevati za neki izid iz materialnih vzgibov.
This also requires that the mediator is able to talk with all actors relevant to resolving the conflict. 
To prav tako pomeni, da mora biti zmožen komunicirati z vsemi akterji, ki so pomembni za rešitev spora.
Impartiality is not synonymous with neutrality, as a mediator, especially a United Nations mediator, is typically mandated to uphold certain universal principles and values and may need to make them explicitly known to the parties. 
Nepristranskost ne pomeni nevtralnosti, saj mora mediator, še zlasti mediator Organizacije združenih narodov, upoštevati nekatera splošno veljavna načela in vrednote ter jih po potrebi pojasniti sprtim stranem.
To address the issue of impartiality, mediators should: 
Da mediatorji uveljavijo nepristranskost, morajo:
Ensure and seek to demonstrate that the process and the treatment of the parties is fair and balanced, including through an effective communications strategy. 
zagotoviti in nazorno prikazati, da sta postopek in obravnava sprtih strani pravična in uravnotežena, pri čemer velja uporabiti tudi učinkovite strategije komuniciranja;
Be transparent with the conflict parties regarding the laws and norms that guide their involvement. 
sprtim stranem odprto pojasniti zakonodajo in norme, ki urejajo njihovo delovanje;
Not accept conditions for support from external actors that would affect the impartiality of the process. 
odkloniti pogojevano podporo zunanjih akterjev, ki bi vplivala na nepristranskost postopka;
Avoid association with punitive measures against conflict parties by other actors and minimize public criticism of the parties as much as possible, while maintaining frank exchanges in private. 
izogibati se navezovanju na kazenske ukrepe proti sprtim stranem drugih akterjev in čim bolj omejiti javno kritiziranje strani, hkrati pa nadaljevati odkrit pogovor v zaupnem okolju;
Handover to another mediator, or mediating entity, if they feel unable to maintain a balanced and impartial approach. 
prepustiti postopek drugemu mediatorju ali mediatorskemu subjektu, če se ne počutijo sposobne ohranjati uravnoteženega in nepristranskega pristopa.
Inclusivity 
Vključenost
Inclusivity refers to the extent and manner in which the views and needs of conflict parties and other stakeholders are represented and integrated into the process and outcome of a mediation effort. 
Pojem vključenosti se nanaša na obseg in način, po katerem so stališča in potrebe sprtih strani in drugih udeležencev predstavljeni ter vključeni v postopek in izid mediacije.
An inclusive process is more likely to identify and address the root causes of conflict and ensure that the needs of the affected sectors of the population are addressed. 
Vključujoči postopek bo bolj verjetno prepoznal in odpravil glavne vzroke spora ter zagotovil, da so upoštevane potrebe prizadetih skupin prebivalstva.
Inclusivity also increases the legitimacy and national ownership of the peace agreement and its implementation. 
Vključenost prav tako prispeva k večji verodostojnosti in nacionalnemu lastništvu mirovnega sporazuma in njegovega izvajanja.
In addition, it reduces the likelihood of excluded actors undermining the process. 
Poleg tega zmanjšuje verjetnost, da bi izključeni akterji ovirali postopek.
An inclusive process does not imply that all stakeholders participate directly in the formal negotiations, but facilitates interaction between the conflict parties and other stakeholders and creates mechanisms to include all perspectives in the process. 
Vključujoči postopek ne pomeni, da vsi udeleženci v formalnih pogajanjih sodelujejo neposredno, temveč je namenjen zagotavljanju stikov med sprtimi stranmi in drugimi udeleženci ter ustvarja mehanizme za vključitev vseh vidikov v postopek.
It cannot be assumed that conflict parties have legitimacy with, or represent, the wider public. 
Ni mogoče vnaprej domnevati, da sprte strani uživajo verodostojnost v širši javnosti ali da jo predstavljajo.
Mediation efforts that involve only armed groups may send the signal that violence is rewarded. 
Mediacija, v kateri sodelujejo samo oborožene skupine, lahko na primer daje vtis, da se nasilje nagrajuje.
In addition to generating resentment within other sectors of society, this could encourage others to take up arms in order to get a place at the negotiating table. 
To ne vzbuja zgolj nezadovoljstva v drugih družbenih skupinah, temveč bi jih lahko spodbudilo, da si poskušajo mesto za pogajalsko mizo pridobiti z orožjem.
Civil society actors can play a critical role in increasing the legitimacy of a peace process and are potentially important allies. 
Civilnodružbena gibanja imajo lahko odločilno vlogo pri krepitvi verodostojnosti mirovnega procesa in so lahko pomembni zavezniki.
Women leaders and women&apos;s groups are often effective in peacemaking at community levels and should therefore be more strongly linked to the high-level mediation process. 
Ženske na vodilnih položajih in ženska združenja so pogosto učinkovita pri vzpostavljanju miru na ravni skupnosti in bi morala biti bolj vključena v uradne postopke mediacije na višjih ravneh.
However, support from civil society and other stakeholders cannot be taken for granted, as some of these actors may have hard-line positions and oppose the mediation. 
Vendar pa podpora civilne družbe in drugih udeležencev ni samoumevna, saj imajo lahko nekateri od teh akterjev skrajne zahteve in nasprotujejo mediaciji.
In designing an inclusive process, mediators face a number of challenges. 
Pri pripravi vključujočega postopka se mediatorji srečujejo s številnimi izzivi.
There may be instances in which not all conflict parties want to engage in mediation or have sufficient levels of coherence to negotiate, making only a partial process possible. 
Lahko se zgodi, da v mediaciji nočejo sodelovati vse sprte strani ali niso dovolj enotne za pogajanja, zaradi česar je mogoč samo delni postopek.
Arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court, sanctions regimes, and national and international counter-terrorism policies also affect the manner in which some conflict parties may be engaged in a mediation process. 
Zaporni nalogi Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, sankcije ter domači in mednarodni ukrepi v boju proti terorizmu prav tako vplivajo na to, kako nekatere sprte strani sodelujejo v postopku mediacije.
Mediators need to protect the space for mediation and their ability to engage with all actors while making sure that the process respects the relevant legal limitations. 
Mediatorji morajo zagotoviti prostor za mediacijo in zavarovati svojo sposobnost sodelovanja z vsemi akterji, hkrati pa poskrbeti, da je postopek skladen z ustreznimi pravnimi okviri.
In seeking to broaden the process to other stakeholders, mediators may also face constraints from conflict parties who generally seek to determine who, how and when different actors are brought into the process. 
V prizadevanju, da bi v postopek vključili še druge udeležence, se mediatorji lahko prav tako srečajo z odklonilnimi stališči in mnenji sprtih strani, ki običajno želijo imeti odločilno besedo pri določanju akterjev, ki naj bodo vključeni v postopek, načinih in fazi njihove vključitve v proces.
In some instances, more exclusive dialogue with conflict parties may be required to move the process forward expeditiously, for example in negotiating ceasefires, especially where parties feel too exposed politically or if their security may be compromised. 
Včasih je potreben bolj zaprt dialog s sprtimi stranmi, da postopek steče hitreje, kot na primer v mirovnih pogajanjih, še zlasti tam, kjer se strani počutijo preveč politično izpostavljene ali če je ogrožena njihova varnost.
Mediators need to gauge the comfort levels of conflict parties and convince them of the value of broadening participation. 
Mediatorji morajo znati preceniti občutke sprtih strani in jih prepričati o pomenu vključevanja drugih akterjev.
They also have to balance having a transparent process with protecting the confidentiality of the talks. 
Prav tako morajo zagotavljati ravnotežje med preglednostjo postopka in zaupnostjo pogovorov.
Mediators have to grapple with the potential tension between inclusivity and efficiency. 
Mediatorji morajo tudi ustrezno oceniti razmerje med vključenostjo in učinkovitostjo.
Mediation processes become more complex (and may be overloaded) when the consultation base expands and/or multiple forums are used to engage actors at different levels. 
Postopek mediacije postane bolj zapleten (lahko celo preveč), kadar se krog udeležencev razširi ali so uporabljeni različni forumi za sodelovanje z akterji na različnih ravneh.
In addition, it may be difficult to engage interest groups that are not easily defined or lack clear leadership, for example social movements and youth groups. 
Poleg tega je včasih težko pritegniti interesne skupine, ki jih ni lahko opredeliti ali ki nimajo jasnih vodstvenih struktur ali voditeljev, na primer družbena gibanja in skupine mladih.
These kinds of issues put a premium on stakeholder mapping, planning and management of the process. 
Navedeno otežuje opredelitev udeležencev, načrtovanje in vodenje postopka.
Building on a comprehensive mapping of all conflict parties and stakeholders, mediators should: 
Na podlagi poglobljene analize vseh strani v sporu in ustreznih udeležencev morajo mediatorji:
Identify the level of inclusivity needed for the mediation to start and required for a durable peace that addresses the needs of all affected by the conflict. 
opredeliti, kako vključujoč postopek je potreben za začetek mediacije in za zagotovitev trajnega miru, ki upošteva potrebe vseh prizadetih v sporu;
Communicate with any party or actor necessary to address the conflict, with the knowledge of the other negotiating parties. 
navezati stike z vsemi stranmi ali akterji, ki so potrebni za reševanje spora, s čimer so seznanjene tudi druge strani v pogajanjih;
Limit contacts with actors that have been indicted by the International Criminal Court to what is necessary for the mediation process. 
omejiti stike z akterji, za katere je Mednarodno kazensko sodišče izdalo obtožnico, na zgolj nujne za nemoten postopek mediacije;
Promote understanding among conflict parties of the value of broader participation and minimize preconditions for participation in the process. 
ozaveščati sprte strani o pomenu vključenosti in omejiti pogojevanje za sodelovanje v postopku;
Ensure systematic and structured consultation with women&apos;s groups early in the process to allow for meaningful participation, with specific efforts to include them in the mediation process. 
zagotoviti sistematično in strukturirano posvetovanje z ženskimi združenji že na začetku postopka, kar bo omogočilo njihovo vsebinsko sodelovanje, ter si posebej prizadevati, da se vključijo v postopek mediacije;
Encourage conflict parties to include women in their delegations. 
spodbujati sprte strani, da v svoje delegacije vključujejo ženske;
Identify partners to help build the capacity of civil society and other relevant stakeholders to engage effectively. 
opredeliti partnerje, ki lahko pomagajo pri usposabljanju civilne družbe in drugih udeležencev za učinkovito sodelovanje;
Develop mechanisms to broaden participation in the process, and to engage and include the different perspectives within civil society and other stakeholders, throughout the various phases of the peace process. 
najti mehanizme za zagotavljanje široke udeležbe v postopku ter za spodbujanje sodelovanja in vključevanja različnih pogledov znotraj civilne družbe in drugih udeležencev v vseh fazah mirovnega procesa;