natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the scenario (+), the share of industry should stabilise at approximately 38% of GDP, agriculture should retain a share of approximately 4% of GDP and service activities should reach 58% of GDP by 2000. 
Po scenariju pozitivnega gospodarskega razvoja Slovenije (+) naj bi se delež industrije ustalil na okoli 38% BDP, kmetijstvo bi ohranilo delež okoli 4% BDP, storitvene dejavnosti pa bi do leta 2000 dosegle 58% BDP.
It is estimated that by 2000 the average productivity growth in industry will be 5.8% a year, provided that the employment is reduced by approximately 24 000 persons. 
Povprečna letna rast produktivnosti v industriji do leta 2000 je ocenjena na 5,8% ob nadaljnjem zmanjševanju zaposlenosti za okoli 24.000 oseb.
The scenario (-) anticipates less favourable developments, resulting in 4% annual productivity, provided that the employment is reduced twice as much as above. 
Scenarij negativnega gospodarskega razvoja Slovenije (-) predvideva mnogo manj ugodna dogajanja, ki dosegajo 4-odstotno povprečno letno rast produktivnosti, vendar ob več kot še enkrat večjem zmanjšanju števila zaposlenosti.
Given the available natural resources, crop production will increase in the next few years, while livestock production will slightly decrease. 
Kmetijstvo bo ob danih naravnih možnostih pridelave v naslednjih letih povečalo predvsem poljedelsko proizvodnjo, medtem ko se bo v živinoreji ta nekoliko zmanjševala.
The State will promote by subsidising the programmes for the dezintensification of agricultural production (agri-environment programmes Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92). 
To bo spodbujala tudi država z večjimi subvencijami v programe dezintenzifikacije kmetijske proizvodnje (kmetijsko-okoljski programi uredba EU 2078/92).
Both scenarios predict similar agricultural production growth rate. 
Velike razlike v stopnji rasti kmetijstva po obeh scenarijih ni.
The following table shows the factors which increase and reduce the pressure on the environment. 
V nadaljevanju so prikazani dejavniki stopnjevanja in zmanjševanja pritiskov na okolje
Factors increasing the pressure on the environment 
Dejavniki stopnjevanja pritiskov na okolje
Economic revival may establish a pollution pattern similar to that in the period prior to the economic crisis. 
oživljanje gospodarstva z nevarnostjo vzpostavitve podobnega onesnaževalnega vzorca kot pred obdobjem gospodarske krize
The intensification of agriculture in suitable areas and abandonment of less suitable areas may threaten the traditional relations between man and nature. 
intenzifikacija primernih in opuščanju manj primernih površin lahko ogrozi tradicionalna občutljiva razmerja med človekom in naravo.
The release of GMOs into the environment is expected to increase. 
pričakuje se povečan vnos genetsko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje
Animal and plant species are more and more endangered owing to hydro-technical and agritechnical activities, the construction of motorways and the introduction of nonindigenous plant and animal species. 
povečana ogroženost rastlinskih in živalskih vrst zaradi hidrotehničnih in agrotehničnih. posegov, izgradnje avtocest, vnašanja tujih rastlinskih in živalskih vrst
The expansion of recreation and tourism into the areas with most vulnerable (though in terms of tourism very attractive) ecosystems, disregarding environmental considerations. 
naraščanje rekreacije ter nevarnost okoljsko neobvladanega prodora turizma na območja najobčutljivejših (in turistično atraktivnih) ekosistemov itd.
The expansion of private initiatives to new locations, which will lead to further threats to the environment and biological diversity if national environmental protection is not established. 
sproščanje zasebne iniciative, ki bo terjala nove lokacije in bo brez vzpostavljanja državne funkcije varstva okolja vodilo v nadaljnje ogrožanje okolja in biotske raznovrstnosti.
The subordination of environmental objectives to other, mostly short-term (social and other) interests. 
podrejanje okoljskih ciljev drugim, predvsem kratkoročnim (socialnim in drugim) interesom,.
Increased transit goods transport resulting in increased emissions generated by traffic. 
povečan pritisk na tranzitni tovorni promet in s tem povečevanje emisij iz prometa,
Intensified traffic is expected to increase the air emissions. 
povečan promet bo po ocenah prispeval k povečanju emisij v ozračje
The attempts of foreign investors to introduce “dirty” and cheap technologies. 
poskusi vnosa &quot;umazanih&quot; in cenejših tehnologij zunanjih investitorjev.
Factors reducing the pressure on the environment 
Dejavniki zmanjševanja pritiskov na okolje.
The upgrading of legal and economic instruments of environmental protection in compliance with the requirements of harmonizing the environmental protection system with that of the developed countries. 
dograjevanje pravnih in ekonomskih inštrumentov varovanja okolja v skladu z zahtevami pri uskladitvi.s stanjem varstva v razvitih državah
The fulfilment of assumed international obligations (e.g. the Convention on Biological Diversity), as well as those which Slovenia will assume upon accession to the EU (e.g. the habitats directive and wild birds directive). 
izpolnjevanje že prevzetih mednarodnih obveznosti (npr. Konvencija o biološki raznovrstnosti) ali tistih, ki jih bo država prevzela ob priključitvi EU (npr. Smernice za varstvo ptičev,. Smernice za varstvo flore, favne in habitatov
Institution building at all levels and strengthened control of sources of threats to the environment. 
inštitucionalna krepitev na vseh ravneh ter okrepljen nadzor nad viri ogrožanja okolja.
Adapting of export industry (mainly those branches which produce finished products) to EU environmental standards. 
prilagajanje izvozne industrije (predvsem tistih panog, ki proizvajajo končne izdelke) okoljskim standardom EU.
The realisation of rehabilitation programmes on the basis of ecological reservations (funds reserved for environmental protection) in the process of the ownership transformation of companies. 
realizacija sanacijskih programov na osnovi &quot;okoljskih rezervacij&quot; v procesu lastninjenja podjetij.
Raising environmental awareness and increasing knowledge of environmental protection problems. 
dvig stopnje okoljske zavesti in povečanje znanj o okoljski problematiki
The restructuring of Slovenian agriculture with the assistance of financial incentives for the preservation of traditional agriculture in accordance with EU policy. 
prestrukturiranje slovenskega kmetijstva na podlagi pričakovanih finančnih spodbud za ohranjanje tradicionalnih oblik kmetijstva v skladu s politiko EU.
Slovenia&apos;s Basic Environmental Protection Objectives 
Osnovni cilji varstva okolja v Sloveniji
4.1 Ranking of Objectives by Importance 
4.1 Razvrstitev ciljev po pomenu
Environmental problems have been identified31 and ranked by importance. They have served as a basis for defining strategic goals for the drawing-up of the action programme. 
Na podlagi izvedenega postopka identifikacije so bili problemi v okolju razvrščeni po pomenu in iz njih izpeljani osnovni strateški cilji kot podlaga za izdelavo akcijskega programa.
The objectives themselves and their ranking will be subject to constant examination and supplementation in the process of the adoption and monitoring of the implementation of the NEAP. 
Cilji sami in njihova razvrstitev po pomenu so seveda predmet preverjanja in dopolnjevanja v procesu sprejemanja in spremljanja izvajanja NPVO.
A list of objectives ranked by importance has been drawn up for every subject area: 
Za vsako tematsko področje je podan seznam po pomenu razvrščenih ciljev:
Aquatic Environment 
Vodno okolje
WTR1) to reduce emissions from point sources wastewater from industry and livestock farms and urban wastewater 
VO1) Zmanjšanje emisij iz točkovnih virov - odpadne vode iz industrije, živinorejskih farm in komunalne odpadne vode
WTR2) to reduce emissions from diffuse sources intensive agriculture, dispersed settlements without wastewater treatment facilities, traffic 
VO2) Zmanjšanje emisij iz razpršenih virov - intenzivno kmetijstvo, razpršena poselitev brez urejenega čiščenja odpadnih voda, promet
WTR3) to restrict old pollution sources threatening the aquatic environment 
VO3) Sanacija starih bremen, ki ogrožajo vodno okolje
WTR4) to prevent inappropriate activities affecting the aquatic environment 
VO4) Sanacija in preprečitev neustreznih posegov v vodno okolje
Waste Management 
Ravnanje z odpadki
WST1) to reduce waste generation and its danger potential at a source 
ODP1) Zmanjšanje nastajanja in nevarnostnega potenciala odpadkov pri izvoru,
WST2) to increase material and energy utilisation of waste and reduce greenhouse gas emissions 
ODP2) Povečanje snovne in energetske izrabe odpadkov ter zmanjševanje emisij toplogrednih plinov,
WST3) to set up an effective waste management system 
ODP3) Vzpostavitev učinkovitega sistema ravnanja z odpadki,
WST4) to gradually eliminate old pollution sources 
ODP4) Postopna odprava starih bremen.
Biological Diversity and Genetic Resources 
Biotska raznovrstnost in genski viri
BIO1) to prevent the reduction of biological diversity on the level of ecosystems (and habitat types), species (and habitats) and genomes (and genes) 
BIO1) Preprečiti zmanjševanje biotske raznovrstnosti na ravni ekosistemov (in habitatnih tipov), vrst (in habitatov) ter genomov (in genov),
BIO2) to prevent further threats to natural balance caused by inappropriate exploitation of animal and plant species 
BIO2) Preprečiti nadaljnje ogrožanje naravnega ravnovesja zaradi neustreznega izkoriščanja rastlinskih in živalskih vrst
AIR1) to reduce air pollution from industrial sources 
ZR1) Zmanjševanje onesnaževanja zraka iz industrijskih virov,
AIR2) to reduce emissions from thermal power plants 
ZR2) Zmanjšanje emisij iz termoelektrarn,
AIR3) to limit the air pollution caused by traffic 
ZR3) Obvladovanje onesnaževanja zraka zaradi prometa,
AIR4) to reduce emissions from individual and collective heating systems (boiler rooms) in urban areas 
ZR4) Zmanjševanje emisij iz individualnih in skupinskih (kotlovnice) kurišč v naseljih,
AIR5) to limit the causes of photo-chemical smog and tropospheric ozone 
ZR5) Zmanjševanje vzrokov za pojav fotokemijskega smoga in troposferskega ozona,
AIR6) to abolish the use of CFC 
ZR6) Odprava uporabe CFC
AIR7) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (Kyoto Protocol) 
ZR7) Zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov (Kioto),
AIR8) to control long-range air pollution 
ZR8) Obvladovanje problemov onesnaževanja zraka na velike razdalje.
Soil and Forest 
Tla in gozd
SOIL1) to limit chemical soil pollution and to carry out the necessary rehabilitation 
TLA1) Omejiti kemično onesnaževanje tal in izvesti nujno sanacijo,
SOIL2) to limit the physical degradation of soil (compaction, erosion, etc.) 
TLA2) Omejiti fizikalno degradacijo tal (zbitost, erozijo...),
SOIL3) to limit the further degradation of forest soil 
TLA3) Omejiti nadaljnjo degradacijo gozdnih tal.
NOS1) to abate noise caused by road traffic 
HR1) Zmanjšanje hrupa zaradi cestnega prometa
NOS2) to abate noise caused by other sources 
HR2) Zmanjšanje hrupa iz ostalih virov
Ionising Radiation 
Ionizirna sevanja
RAD1) to provide for an effective radioactive waste management 
SEV1) zagotoviti učinkovito ravnanje z radioaktivnimi odpadki,
RAD2) to control radioactive radiation in the environment 
SEV2) obvladovati radioaktivna sevanja v zunanjem okolju.
Non-Ionising Radiation 
Neionizirna sevanja
NIR1) to identify and control individual sources of non-ionising radiation 
NIS1) identificirati in postopoma obvladati posamezne vire neionizirnih sevanj.
RISK1) to provide appropriate procedures for handling chemicals and GMOs in production, transport and use 
TVE1) Zagotovitev ustreznih postopkov ravnanja s kemikalijami in gensko spremenjenimi organizmi v proizvodnji, prometu in uporabi
RISK2) to enforce appropriate procedures for the storage, transportation and disposal of chemicals 
TVE2) Uveljavitev ustreznega skladiščenja, transporta in odlaganja kemikalij
4.2 Strategic Orientation 
4.2 Izbor strateške usmeritve
The characteristic of environmental policy in the past were its modest results. 
Ena od značilnosti politike okolja v preteklosti so sorazmerno skromni rezultati varovanja okolja.
One of the many reasons was that more important environmental problems were not distinguished from less important ones, which led to the fragmentation of the limited environmental protection funds. 
Razlogi za to so številni, eden od njih je tudi nejasno razmejevanje med bolj in manj pomembnimi problemi okolja. Nejasnost je vodila v pretirano drobitev skromnih sredstev za okolje.
By determining priorities, we do not neglect the integrated approach to environmental problems. On the contrary, we focus on critical sites or areas and on the more effective utilisation of available resources. 
Določitev prioritet ne pomeni odstopa od celovitega pristopa k problemom okolja, ampak je predvsem orodje osredotočanja na kritične točke oz. področja in s tem učinkovitejše porabe virov, ki so na voljo.
In the drawing-up of the NEAP, four strategic options were weighed: 
V procesu priprave NPVO so bile pretehtane štiri strateške možnosti:
There are no differences between individual environmental protection fields. 
Med posameznimi področji varstva okolja ni razlik.
All fields are equally important. 
Vsa področja so enako pomembna;
Priority should be given to one field. 
Osredotočiti se je potrebno na eno področje in ga rešiti;
Priority should be given to a number of strategically important fields. 
Osredotočiti se je potrebno na nekaj strateško pomembnih področij;
Priorities are determined by the process of accession to the EU. 
Z odločitvijo za vstop v EU so prioritete določene.
Following numerous discussions, a decision had been made to adopt the third option. The decision is based on the following: 
Na podlagi številnih razprav je bila sprejeta odločitev za tretjo možnost z naslednjo utemeljitvijo:
The first option had not been accepted as it would have led to the fragmentation of the limited funds. In addition to this, Slovenia had in the past gathered positive experience from focusing on the key problems, for example in the field of air protection. 
Prva možnost ni bila sprejeta zaradi nevarnosti pretirane drobitve skromnih sredstev ter dobrih izkušenj z osredotočenjem na ključne probleme, kot je bil to primer na področju varstva zraka.
The second option had not been accepted for conceptual and practical reasons. 
Druga možnost ni bila sprejeta iz konceptualnih in praktičnih razlogov.
Environmental problems are interconnected, which means that it is practically impossible to focus on one exclusively. 
Problemi okolja so povezani, zato praktično ni mogoče izbrati samo ene možnosti.
In the late sixties and early seventies Japan took on such approach. It devoted all its attention to the elimination of the most hazardous pollutants (e.g. heavy metals). 
Takšno prakso je poznala npr. Japonska na prehodu v sedemdeseta leta, ko je vso pozornost usmerila samo na odpravo najnevarnejših polutantov (npr. težke kovine).
There are no real bases for a similar approach in Slovenia. This option would probably have brought stagnation in a number of environmental protection fields in which Slovenia had already achieved encouraging results. 
Za podoben način reševanja v Sloveniji ni realnih osnov in bi izbor takšne možnosti lahko pomenil stagnacijo na vrsti področij, kjer Slovenija že dosega spodbudne rezultate.
The selected third option is not in discordance with fourth option. The objectives determined by the current state of the environment would not be abandoned. 
Izbrana tretja možnost je podpirala četrto možnost, ne da bi bilo treba zaradi tega odstopiti od ciljev, ki jih zahteva stanje v okolju.
The comparison of costs of the implementation of EU approximation projects32 with the costs of meeting the NEAP priority objectives has shown that 89% of the funds allocated for the approximation are directed to the three selected NEAP priority areas. 
Primerjava stroškov, potrebnih za izvedbo projektov za uskladitev z zahtevami EU(20) z izbranimi prioritetami NPVO, je pokazala, da je ca. 89% sredstev iz naslova aproksimacije neposredno usmerjenih na tri izbrana prednostna področja.
The analysis of connections between the fundamental environmental protection objectives and the objectives concerning the fulfilment of the EU requirements has shown the following: 
Analiza povezav med osnovnimi cilji varstva okolja in cilji iz naslova približevanja zahtevam EU je pokazala:
All investments related to the integration with the EU support the NEAP objectives. 
Vse investicije iz naslova pridruževanja EU podpirajo cilje NPVO.
Landscape, soil and forest protection are not directly affected by EU requirements. They will be covered by the spatial plan of the Republic of Slovenia (in preparation) and the long-term forest management and agriculture programmes. 
Zunaj neposrednega vpliva zahtev EU so predvsem področja varstva krajine, tal in gozda, ki so v Sloveniji programsko pokrita s Prostorskim planom Republike Slovenije (v pripravi) ter dolgoročnimi programi gospodarjenja z gozdovi in kmetijstva (že sprejeti).
The investments in environmental protection required by the approximation to the EU exceed the funds currently available for that purpose. We will not be able to implement the required tasks without substantial EU assistance. 
Investicije v varstvo okolja, ki jih zahteva samo pridruževanje EU, presegajo danes razpoložljiva sredstva za varstvo okolja, zato zahtevane naloge ne bo mogoče izpeljati drugače kot z izdatno pomočjo EU.
In the next ten years virtually all available funds would have to be invested in the approximation projects. 
Hkrati to tudi pomeni, da obseg nalog, ki jih zahteva približevanje, predstavlja praktično maksimum možnih investicij v naslednjih desetih letih.
The budget funds will have to be allocated mainly to institutional strengthening at the national and the local level and to those fields were EU has no interests. 
Sredstva, ki so na voljo v proračunu, bo potrebno tako nameniti predvsem za inštitucionalno krepitev na državni in lokalni ravni ter za tista področja, kjer ni mogoče sklepati na prekrivanje interesov z EU.
In the past, one of the major problems in Slovenia was air pollution. It threatened more than 40% of the population and largely contributed to the deterioration of forests. 
V preteklosti je bila v Sloveniji ena največjih težav onesnaženost zraka, ki je ogrožala nekaj nad 40% prebivalcev in močno pripomogla k obsežnemu propadanju gozdov.
It is therefore not surprising that the first priority enforced in practice was the improvement of air quality. 
Zaradi tega ni presenetljivo, da je bila prva v praksi uveljavljena prioriteta izboljšanje kakovosti zraka.
In the period of ten years coal was to a large extent substituted with other, more environment-friendly fuels and more appropriate energy systems were applied. 
V desetih letih je bila izvedena obsežna zamenjava uporabe premoga z drugimi za okolje ustreznejšimi energenti in energetskimi sistemi.
One block of the Šoštanj thermal power plant has been successfully rehabilitated and the rehabilitation of the fifth block has started. Cogeneration plant in Ljubljana began to use the coal with a substantially lower sulphur content. 
Izvedena je bila uspešna sanacija enega bloka v TE Šoštanj in že začeta sanacija tudi petega bloka, ljubljanska TE-TO je pričela uporabljati premog z bistveno manjšo vsebnostjo žvepla.
Expert analysis of the current state and environmental trends and the assessment of Slovenia&apos;s strategic comparative advantages showed that most attention will have to be given to water, waste management and the conservation of biological diversity, which is an important strategic comparative advantage of Slovenia. 
Strokovna analiza stanja in predvsem trendov v okolju ter ocena primerjalnih strateških prednosti Slovenije v evropskem prostoru je pokazala, da se bo treba v prihodnje najbolj posvetiti skrbi za vodo, ustreznemu ravnanju z odpadki ter ohranitvi biotske raznovrstnosti, ki je pomembna strateška primerjalna prednost Slovenije.
Slovenia&apos;s priority goals at the turn of the millennium are: 
Prednostni cilji Slovenije na prehodu v tretje tisočletje so:
to successfully conclude the air protection programmes and to supplement them with the programmes for reducing concentrations of tropospheric ozone and other hazardous substances and for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, 
- uspešno dokončanje zastavljenih programov varstva zraka, in njihovo dopolnitev s programi zmanjševanja imisijskih koncentracij troposferskega ozona in drugih škodljivih snovi ter emisij toplogrednih plinov,
to improve the state of the aquatic environment 
- izboljšanje stanja vodnega okolja,
to introduce the modern methods of waste management 
- uveljavitev sodobnih oblik ravnanja z odpadki,
to conserve and protect biological diversity and genetic resources. 
- ohranjanje in varstvo biotske raznovrstnosti in genskih virov.
It has to be emphasised that one of the priority goals is also: 
Prav tako je treba poudariti, da je prednostni cilji tudi
to strengthen environmental protection institutions at all levels, which is the basic condition for achieving the objectives of the NEAP. 
- krepitev inštitucij varstva okolja na vseh ravneh, kar je osnovni pogoj za dosego ciljev tega NPVO.
NEAP Balancing the Desirable and the Feasible 
NPVO Iskanje poti med želenim in možnim
5.1 Basic Principles for the Management of Environmental Issues in the Future 
5.1 Temeljna načela prihodnjega urejanja okoljskih vprašanj
Shift Towards Sustainable Development 
Zasuk k trajnostnemu razvoju
The period of transition is an opportunity to introduce changes in accordance with the principles of sustainability. 
Čas prehoda je predvsem priložnost za spremembe po načelu trajnosti.
In this document the concept of sustainable development is construed mainly as an agent for changing the current production and consumption patterns or, in the widest possible sense, the current relationship between nature and society. 
Koncept trajnosti razvoja v tem dokumentu razumemo predvsem kot vzvod spreminjanja sedanjih vzorcev proizvodnje in porabe, oziroma, v najširšem pomenu, sedanjega razmerja med naravo in družbo.
With this national programme the goals of sustainable development will not be achieved, although the application of the defined measures and the regular monitoring of the implementation of the NEAP will be important steps towards these goals. 
Cilj trajnostnega razvoja ne bo dosežen s tem nacionalnim programom, vendar pa bo izvedba opredeljenih ukrepov in predvsem zamišljen sistem rednega spremljanja izvajanja pomemben korak v uresničevanju tega načela(21).
This also includes the following postulations: 
Med drugim to predpostavlja tudi(22):
the continuation of human activity and unhindered development in the future depend on the appropriate management of the environment and natural resources; 
trajnost aktivnosti človeka in nemoteni razvoj v prihodnosti sta odvisna od ustreznega gospodarjenja z okoljem in naravnimi viri;
natural resources and capacities are limited, therefore the wise management of energy and matter flow throughout the entire cycle from extraction to utilisation is required; 
zaloge naravnih virov in zmogljivosti so končne, kar zahteva smotrno obvladovanje tokov snovi in energije v celotnem ciklusu, od pridobivanja do uporabe;
we all have to be aware that certain natural resources are non-renewable and that every time we use them, it is at someone else&apos;s expense. 
vsak posameznik se mora zavedati neobnovljivosti nekaterih naravnih virov in tega, da gre vsaka poraba naravnih virov na račun nekoga drugega.
Sustainable development is defined as an increasingly important strategic task of the State, which has to find its place in the orientations of all development sectors. 
Skrb za trajnostni razvoj je izrecno opredeljena kot vse pomembnejša strateška naloga države(23), ki mora najti svoje mesto v okviru razvojnih usmeritev vseh razvojnih sektorjev.
Better to Prevent than Cure 
Bolje preprečevati kot zdraviti