natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 8, and subject to the specific conditions and limits laid down in the laws and regulations in force in the Parties, co-productions may be granted co-production status under the provisions of this Convention if they meet the following conditions 
Ne glede na določbe 8. člena in ob upoštevanju posebnih pogojev in omejitev, določenih v zakonih in predpisih, ki veljajo v pogodbenicah, lahko koprodukcije dobijo koprodukcijski status v skladu z določbami te konvencije, če izpolnjujejo te pogoje
When a co-produced cinematographic work is exported to a country where imports of cinematographic works are subject to quotas, and one of the coproducing Parties does not have the right of free entry for his cinematographic works to the importing country 
Če se filmsko delo, posneto v koprodukciji, izvozi v državo, ki ima kvote za uvoz filmskih del, in če ena od koprodukcijskih pogodbenic nima pravice do prostega vstopa za svoja filmska dela v državo uvoznico
Festivals 
Festivali
This Convention shall be open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and the other States party to the European Cultural Convention which may express their consent to be bound by 
Ta konvencija je na voljo za podpis članicam Sveta Evrope in drugim državam pogodbenicam Evropske kulturne konvencije, ki lahko izrazijo svoje soglasje, da jih obvezuje
The Convention shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of three months after the date on which five States, including at least four member States of the Council of Europe, have expressed their consent to be bound by the Convention in accordance with the provisions of Article 16. 
Konvencija začne veljati prvi dan v mesecu po poteku trimesečnega obdobja od datuma, ko je pet držav, od katerih so vsaj štiri članice Sveta Evrope, izrazilo svoje soglasje, da jih konvencija obvezuje v skladu z določbami 16. člena.
Accession by non-member States 
Pristop držav nečlanic
Territorial clause 
Ozemeljska določba
Any State may, at the time of signature or when depositing its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, specify the territory or territories to which this Convention shall apply. 
Ob podpisu ali deponiranju listine o ratifikaciji, sprejetju, odobritvi ali pristopu lahko vsaka država določi ozemlje ali ozemlja, za katera se ta konvencija uporablja.
In respect of such territory, the Convention shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of three months after the date of receipt of such declaration by the Secretary General. 
Za to ozemlje začne konvencija veljati prvi dan v mesecu po poteku trimesečnega obdobja od datuma, ko generalni sekretar prejme tako izjavo.
Any declaration made under the two preceding paragraphs may, in respect of any territory specified in such declaration, be withdrawn by a notification addressed to the Secretary General. 
Vsaka izjava na podlagi prejšnjih dveh odstavkov glede katerega koli ozemlja, navedenega v tej izjavi, se lahko umakne z uradnim obvestilom, naslovljenim na generalnega sekretarja.
The withdrawal shall become effective on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of three months after the date of receipt of such notification by the Secretary General. 
Umik začne veljati prvi dan v mesecu po poteku trimesečnega obdobja od datuma, ko generalni sekretar prejme tako obvestilo.
The withdrawal shall take effect on the date of receipt of such notification by the Secretary General. 
Umik začne veljati z datumom, ko generalni sekretar prejme tako obvestilo.
Any Party may, at any time, denounce this Convention by means of a notification addressed to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe. 
Vsaka pogodbenica lahko kadarkoli odpove to konvencijo z uradnim obvestilom, naslovljenim na generalnega sekretarja Sveta Evrope.
Such denunciation shall become effective on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of six months after the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary General. 
Taka odpoved začne veljati prvi dan v mesecu po poteku šestmesečnega obdobja od datuma, ko generalni sekretar prejme tako obvestilo.
The Secretary General of the Council of Europe shall notify the member States of the Council, as well as any State and the European Economic Community which may accede to this Convention or may be invited to do so, of 
Generalni sekretar Sveta Evrope obvesti države članice Sveta ter katero koli drugo državo in Evropsko gospodarsko skupnosti, ki lahko pristopijo k tej konvenciji ali so povabljene, da k njej pristopijo, o
any signature; 
vsakem podpisu;
the deposit of any instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession; 
deponiranju vsake listine o ratifikaciji, sprejetju, odobritvi ali pristopu;
any date of entry into force of this Convention in accordance with Articles 17, 18 and 19; 
vsakem datumu začetka veljavnosti te konvencije v skladu s 17., 18., in 19. členom;
any other act, notification or communication relating to this Convention. 
vsakem drugem dokumentu, uradnem obvestilu ali sporočilu v zvezi s to konvencijo.
These documents must reach the competent authorities in sufficient number for them to be communicated to the authorities of the other Parties at the latest one month before shooting commences 
Te morajo pristojni organi prejeti v zadostnem številu, da jih lahko pošljejo organom drugih pogodbenic najpozneje en mesec pred začetkom snemanja
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) 
Evropski odbor za preprečevanje mučenja in nehumanega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja (CPT)
&quot;Substantive&quot; sections of the CPT&apos;s General Reports 
»Vsebinska« poglavja splošnih poročil Odbora
In a number of its General Reports the CPT has described some of the substantive issues which it pursues when carrying out visits to places of deprivation of liberty. 
Odbor za preprečevanje mučenja (CPT) je v svojih številnih splošnih poročilih opisal nekatera temeljna vprašanja, ki jim med svojimi obiski prostorov, v katerih se izvajajo različne oblike odvzema prostosti, posveča posebno pozornost.
The Committee hopes in this way to give a clear advance indication to national authorities of its views regarding the manner in which persons deprived of their liberty ought to be treated and, more generally, to stimulate discussion on such matters. 
Na ta način želi Odbor nacionalnim oblastem vnaprej posredovati jasno sporočilo o svojih pogledih glede primernega ravnanja z osebami, ki jim je odvzeta ali omejena prostost. Obenem želi vzpodbuditi širšo razpravo o teh vprašanjih.
The &quot;substantive&quot; sections drawn up to date - which deal with police custody, imprisonment, training of law enforcement personnel, health care services in prisons, foreign nationals detained under aliens legislation, involuntary placement in psychiatric establishments and juveniles deprived of their liberty - have been brought together in this document. 
V tem dokumentu so združena »vsebinska« poglavja splošnih poročil, ki jih je Odbor do danes oblikoval. Ta poglavja se ukvarjajo s policijskim pridržanjem, priporom, zaporom, usposabljanjem organov odkrivanja in pregona, zdravstveno oskrbo v zaporih, tujci, ki jim je prostost odvzeta v skladu z zakonodajo o tujcih, prisilno hospitalizacijo v psihiatričnih ustanovah in s specifičnimi vprašanji mladoletnikov in žensk, ki jim je odvzeta prostost.
Future General Reports will contain further substantive sections, covering such matters as the treatment of women deprived of their liberty and military detention facilities. 
Bodoča splošna poročila bodo vsebovala dodatna poglavja, na temo ravnanja z ženskami, ki jim je odvzeta prostost in vojaških zaporov.
The CPT also intends in due course to update the police custody and imprisonment sections (drawn up in the main in 1992), in order to fully reflect the standards developed by the Committee in these areas during the last ten years. 
CPT namerava tudi v kratkem pregledati in dopolniti poglavja, ki se nanašajo na policijsko prijetje in pridržanje in zapor (ki so bila večinoma napisana l. 1992), tako da bodo celovito odsevala norme, ki jih je Odbor v zadnjih desetih letih razvil na tem področju.
I. Police custody 
I. Policijsko prijetje in pridržanje
Extract from the 2nd General Report [CPT/Inf (92) 3] 
Izvleček iz drugega splošnega poročila [CPT/Inf (92) 3]
The CPT attaches particular importance to three rights for persons detained by the police 
CPT poseben pomen posveča trem pravicam, ki morajo biti zagotovljene osebam, ki jim prostost odvzame policija
the right of the person concerned to have the fact of his detention notified to a third party of his choice (family member, friend, consulate), the right of access to a lawyer, and the right to request a medical examination by a doctor of his choice (in addition to any medical examination carried out by a doctor called by the police authorities). They are, in the CPT&apos;s opinion, three fundamental safeguards against the ill-treatment of detained persons which should apply as from the very outset of deprivation of liberty, regardless of how it may be described under the legal system concerned (apprehension, arrest, etc). 
pravica osebe, da o njenem prijetju obvestijo tretjo osebo po njeni izbiri (npr. družinskega člana, prijatelja, konzulat ipd.); pravica do dostopa odvetnika; pravica osebe, da zahteva zdravstveni pregled, ki ga opravi zdravnik po njeni izbiri (poleg morebitnega zdravstvenega pregleda, ki ga opravi zdravnik po izbiri policije). Te pravice predstavljajo, po mnenju CPT-ja, tri temeljna jamstva proti slabem ravnanju s pridržanimi osebami. Njihovo uveljavljanje mora biti pridržanim osebam omogočeno od samega začetka odvzema prostosti, ne glede na to, kako je ta trenutek določen v posameznem pravnem redu (prijetje, aretacija ipd.).
Persons taken into police custody should be expressly informed without delay of all their rights, including those referred to in paragraph 36. Further, any possibilities offered to the authorities to delay the exercise of one or other of the latter rights in order to protect the interests of justice should be clearly defined and their application strictly limited in time. 
Osebe, ki jim policija odvzame prostost bi morale biti takoj in brez odlašanja obveščene o vseh njihovih pravicah, vključno s pravicami navedenimi v 36. odstavku. Vsaka možnost, da uradni organi zaradi interesa postopka za določen čas odložijo izvajanje ene od zgoraj omenjenih pravic, mora biti vnaprej določno opredeljena in strogo časovno omejena.
As regards more particularly the rights of access to a lawyer and to request a medical examination by a doctor other than one called by the police, systems whereby, exceptionally, lawyers and doctors can be chosen from pre-established lists drawn up in agreement with the relevant professional organisations should remove any need to delay the exercise of these rights. 
Zavlačevanje pri uveljavljanju pravice do dostopa do odvetnika in do zdravstvenega pregleda s strani osebno izbranega zdravnika, je še posebej nepotrebno v ureditvah, ki poznajo sezname odvetnikov in zdravnikov, sestavljenih s sodelovanjem ustreznih strokovnih organizacij.
Access to a lawyer for persons in police custody should include the right to contact and to be visited by the lawyer (in both cases under conditions guaranteeing the confidentiality of their discussions) as well as, in principle, the right for the person concerned to have the lawyer present during interrogation. 
Pravica pridržane osebe do odvetnika bi morala vključevati pravico, da stopi v stik z odvetnikom in da jo odvetnik obišče (v obeh primerih pod pogoji, ki omogočajo zaupnost njunega pogovora), praviloma pa tudi pravico, da je odvetnik prisoten med njenim zaslišanjem.
As regards the medical examination of persons in police custody, all such examinations should be conducted out of the hearing, and preferably out of the sight, of police officers. 
Vsi zdravstveni pregledi pridržanih oseb bi se morali izvajati izven slušnega, zaželeno pa je, da tudi izven vidnega polja policistov.
Further, the results of every examination as well as relevant statements by the detainee and the doctor&apos;s conclusions should be formally recorded by the doctor and made available to the detainee and his lawyer. 
Zdravnik bi moral uradno zabeležiti tako rezultate pregleda in njegove ugotovitve kot vse relevantne izjave pridržane osebe. Tovrsten zapis bi moral biti na razpolago pridržani osebi in njenemu odvetniku.
Turning to the interrogation process, the CPT considers that clear rules or guidelines should exist on the way in which police interviews are to be conducted. 
Glede zasliševanja CPT meni, da bi morala obstajati jasna pravila in navodila, ki bi urejala policijski postopek opravljanja razgovorov.
They should address inter alia the following matters 
Ta bi morala, med drugim, urejati naslednja vprašanja
the informing of the detainee of the identity (name and/or number) of those present at the interview; the permissible length of an interview; rest periods between interviews and breaks during an interview; places in which interviews may take place; whether the detainee may be required to stand while being questioned; the interviewing of persons who are under the influence of drugs, alcohol, etc. 
obveščanje pridržane osebe o identiteti (ime in/ali številka) oseb, prisotnih na razgovoru; dovoljen čas trajanja razgovora; čas za počitek med razgovorom in prekinitve razgovora; prostori, kjer se razgovori sploh lahko opravljajo; ali lahko policija od pridržane osebe zahteva, da ta med zaslišanjem stoji; zasliševanje oseb, ki so pod vplivom alkohola, drog itd..
It should also be required that a record be systematically kept of the time at which interviews start and end, of any request made by a detainee during an interview, and of the persons present during each interview. 
Prav tako bi moralo biti obvezno vodenje natančne in sistematične evidence o času začetka in konca razgovora, o vsaki morebitni zahtevi pridržane osebe med razgovorom in o osebah prisotnih med razgovorom.
The CPT would add that the electronic recording of police interviews is another useful safeguard against the ill-treatment of detainees (as well as having significant advantages for the police). 
CPT bi na tem mestu tudi dodal, da je elektronsko snemanje policijskih razgovorov dodatno in koristno jamstvo proti slabemu ravnanju s pridržanimi osebami (tovrstno snemanje ima tudi pomembne prednosti za policijo samo).
The CPT considers that the fundamental safeguards granted to persons in police custody would be reinforced (and the work of police officers quite possibly facilitated) if a single and comprehensive custody record were to exist for each person detained, on which would be recorded all aspects of his custody and action taken regarding them (when deprived of liberty and reasons for that measure; when told of rights; signs of injury, mental illness, etc; when next of kin/consulate and lawyer contacted and when visited by them; when offered food; when interrogated; when transferred or released, etc.). 
CPT ugotavlja, da bi obstoj enotne in celovite evidence o pridržanju za vsako pridržano osebo posebej, pomembno okrepil temeljna jamstva, ki gredo osebam v policijskem pridržanju. Taka evidenca bi morala vsebovati vse vidike pridržanja za določeno osebo in vsa dejanja izvedena v zvezi z, ali med pridržanjem (kdaj je bila osebi odvzeta prostost in razlogi za ta ukrep; kdaj je bila seznanjena s svojimi pravicami; morebitni znaki poškodb, duševne bolezni ipd.; kdaj je osebo kontaktiral najbližji sorodnik, konzulat ali odvetnik in kdaj jo je katera od teh oseb obiskala; kdaj ji je bila ponujena hrana, kdaj je bila zaslišana; kdaj je bila premeščena ali izpuščena, itd.).
For various matters (for example, items in the person&apos;s possession, the fact of being told of one&apos;s rights and of invoking or waiving them), the signature of the detainee should be obtained and, if necessary, the absence of a signature explained. 
Pri določenih točkah (na primer predmeti, ki jih je imela oseba v svoji posesti ob prijetju; dejstvo, da je bila obveščena o svojih pravicah ter morebitno uveljavljanje ali odrekanje tem pravicam) bi bilo potrebno zahtevati podpis pridržane osebe. V primeru, da podpisa ni, pa bi moralo biti to dejstvo v zaznamku pojasnjeno.
Further, the detainee&apos;s lawyer should have access to such a custody record. 
Odvetnik pridržane osebe bi moral imeti pravico do vpogleda v tovrstno evidenco.
Further, the existence of an independent mechanism for examining complaints about treatment whilst in police custody is an essential safeguard. 
Nadalje, obstoj neodvisnega mehanizma za sprejemanje in reševanje pritožb, ki jih podajo pridržane osebe predstavlja eno ključnih jamstev za preprečevanje slabega ravnanja z osebami, ki jim je policija odvzela prostost.
Custody by the police is in principle of relatively short duration. 
Trajanje policijskega pridržanja je načeloma relativno kratko.
Consequently, physical conditions of detention cannot be expected to be as good in police establishments as in other places of detention where persons may be held for lengthy periods. 
Zato ni mogoče pričakovati, da bodo materialni pogoji pridržanja v policijskih prostorih na enaki ravni kot v drugih prostorih, kjer so osebe priprte/zaprte dalj časa.
However, certain elementary material requirements should be met. 
Ne glede na to, pa morajo tudi policijski prostori za pridržanje zadostiti nekaterim osnovnim materialnim zahtevam.
All police cells should be of a reasonable size for the number of persons they are used to accommodate, and have adequate lighting (i.e. sufficient to read by, sleeping periods excluded) and ventilation; preferably, cells should enjoy natural light. 
Vse policijske celice morajo po velikosti ustrezati številu oseb, ki se v njih nahaja; imeti morajo primerno razsvetljavo (dovolj močno, da se lahko ob njej bere - razen v času spanja) in prezračevanje; zaželeno je, da imajo celice naravno svetlobo.
Further, cells should be equipped with a means of rest (eg. a fixed chair or bench), and persons obliged to stay overnight in custody should be provided with a clean mattress and blankets. 
Nadalje bi morale biti celice opremljene s pohištvom za počitek (npr. pritrjeni stoli ali klopi), osebe, ki ostanejo v pridržanju čez noč, pa morajo imeti na voljo čiste žimnice in odeje.
Persons in custody should be allowed to comply with the needs of nature when necessary in clean and decent conditions, and be offered adequate washing facilities. 
Pridržanim osebam mora biti omogočeno opravljanje bioloških potreb v čistih in spodobnih pogojih, prav tako morajo imeti dostop do primernih sredstev za umivanje.
They should be given food at appropriate times, including at least one full meal (i.e. something more substantial than a sandwich) every day. 
Obroki hrane bi jim morali biti na voljo ob primernih urah, vključevati pa bi morali vsaj en poln obrok (npr. nekaj bolj hranilnega kot sendvič) dnevno.
The issue of what is a reasonable size for a police cell (or any other type of detainee/prisoner accommodation) is a difficult question. 
Odgovor na vprašanje, kakšna je primerna velikost policijske celice (ali drugega prostora za nastanitev pridržanega ali zapornika) ni preprost.
Many factors have to be taken into account when making such an assessment. 
Pri dajanju tovrstne ocene je potrebno upoštevati vrsto dejavnikov.
However, CPT delegations felt the need for a rough guideline in this area. 
Ne glede na to, so delegacije CPT-ja menile, da je potrebno oblikovati vsaj grobe smernice glede tega vprašanja.
The following criterion (seen as a desirable level rather than a minimum standard) is currently being used when assessing police cells intended for single occupancy for stays in excess of a few hours 
Pri ocenjevanju policijskih celic, namenjenih eni osebi za bivanje v trajanju več kot nekaj ur, se trenutno uporabljajo sledeči kriteriji (ki predstavljajo zaželen in ne minimalen standard)
in the order of 7 square metres, 2 metres or more between walls, 2.5 metres between floor and ceiling. 
površina 7 m2; 2 m razdalje med stenami; višina med tlemi in stropom 2,5 m.
The CPT welcomes the support for its work expressed in Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 1257 (1995), on conditions of detention in Council of Europe member States. 
CPT pozdravlja izjavo podpore svojemu delu, ki je bila zapisana v Priporočilu Parlamentarne Skupščine št. 1257 (1995) o pogojih pridržanja v državah Sveta Evrope.
It was also most pleased to learn from the reply to Recommendation 1257 that the Committee of Ministers has invited the authorities of member States to comply with the guidelines on police custody as laid down in the 2nd General Report of the CPT (cf. CPT/Inf (92) 3, paragraphs 36 to 43). 
Prav tako je iz odgovora Sveta Ministrov na Priporočilo 1257 z zadovoljstvom ugotovil, da je Svet Ministrov priporočil državam članicam, da se držijo priporočil glede policijskega pridržanja, kot so zapisana v drugem splošnem poročilu CPT-ja (glej CPT/Inf (92) 2, odstavki 36 - 43).
In this connection, it should be noted that some Parties to the Convention are reluctant to implement fully certain of the CPT&apos;s recommendations concerning safeguards against ill-treatment for persons in police custody, and in particular the recommendation that such persons be accorded a right of access to a lawyer as from the very outset of their custody. 
V povezavi s tem bi CPT rad opozoril, da imajo nekatere države podpisnice Konvencije pomisleke glede uresničevanja določenih priporočil CPT-ja v zvezi z jamstvi zoper slabo ravnanje z osebami, ki jim je policija odvzela prostost. To še posebej velja za priporočilo, da mora biti taki osebi že od vsega začetka omogočena pravica do dostopa do odvetnika.
The CPT wishes to stress that, in its experience, the period immediately following deprivation of liberty is when the risk of intimidation and physical ill-treatment is greatest. 
CPT poudarja, da je v času takoj po odvzemu prostosti tveganje, da bo prijeta oseba izpostavljena psihičnemu in fizičnemu nasilju in slabemu ravnanju, največje.
Consequently, the possibility for persons taken into police custody to have access to a lawyer during that period is a fundamental safeguard against ill-treatment. 
Zato predstavlja pravica, po kateri imajo prijete osebe že v tej prvi fazi dostop do odvetnika, temeljno jamstvo proti slabemu ravnanju.
The existence of that possibility will have a dissuasive effect upon those minded to ill treat detained persons; further, a lawyer is well placed to take appropriate action if ill-treatment actually occurs. 
Obstoj tovrstne pravice bo odvrnil tiste, ki bi nameravali s pridržano osebo slabo ravnati, poleg tega pa lahko odvetnik primerno ukrepa, če je do slabega ravnanja že prišlo.
The CPT recognises that in order to protect the interests of justice, it may exceptionally be necessary to delay for a certain period a detained person&apos;s access to a particular lawyer chosen by him. 
CPT priznava, da je zaradi zaščite interesa postopka, v določenih primerih pridržani osebi izjemoma potrebno za določen čas omejiti dostop do določenega izbranega odvetnika.
However, this should not result in the right of access to a lawyer being totally denied during the period in question. 
Vendar to ne bi smelo privesti do popolnega zanikanja pravice do odvetnika v tem obdobju.
In such cases, access to another independent lawyer who can be trusted not to jeopardise the legitimate interests of the police investigation should be arranged. 
V takih primerih bi moral biti pridržani osebi omogočen dostop do drugega neodvisnega odvetnika, ki mu je mogoče zaupati, da ne bo ogrozil legitimnih interesov policijske preiskave.
The CPT also emphasised in the 2nd General Report the importance of persons taken into police custody being expressly informed without delay of all their rights. 
CPT je tudi v svojem drugem splošnem poročilu poudaril pomen dejstva, da so prijete osebe razumljivo in brez odlašanja obveščene o svojih pravicah.