natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The meaning of the provisions of paragraph 1 is the same as that of the ECHR, but their scope is wider since they apply at all levels including European level. 
Pomen določb prvega odstavka člena 12 Listine je enak tistemu iz EKČP, vendar pa je njihovo področje uporabe širše, ker veljajo na vseh ravneh, vključno na evropski ravni.
In accordance with Article 52(3) of the Charter, limitations on that right may not exceed those considered legitimate by virtue of Article 11(2) of the ECHR. 
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine, omejitve te pravice ne smejo presegati tistih, ki veljajo za upravičene v po drugem odstavku 11. člena EKČP.
This right is also based on Article 11 of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers. 
Ta pravica prav tako temelji na členu 11 Listine Skupnosti o temeljnih socialnih pravicah delavcev.
Paragraph 2 of this Article corresponds to Article I-46(4) of the Constitution. 
Drugi odstavek tega člena ustreza četrtemu odstavku I-46 člena.
This right is deduced primarily from the right to freedom of thought and expression. 
Ta pravica je izvedena predvsem iz pravice do svobode misli in izražanja.
It is to be exercised having regard to Article 1 and may be subject to the limitations authorised by Article 10 of the ECHR. 
Izvaja se ob upoštevanju člena 1 in je lahko predmet omejitev iz 10. člen a EKČP.
This Article is based on the common constitutional traditions of Member States and on Article 2 of the Protocol to the ECHR, which reads as follows: 
Ta člen temelji na skupnih ustavnih tradicijah držav članic in na 2. členu Protokola k EKČP, ki se glasi:
&quot;No person shall be denied the right to education. 
»Nikomur ne sme biti odvzeta pravica do izobraževanja.
In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to education and to teaching, the State shall respect the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.&quot; 
Pri izvajanju funkcij, ki so v zvezi z vzgojo in izobraževanjem, mora država spoštovati pravico staršev, da zagotovijo svojim otrokom takšno vzgojo in izobraževanje, ki sta v skladu z njihovim lastnim verskim in filozofskim prepričanjem.«
It was considered useful to extend this article to access to vocational and continuing training (see point 15 of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers and Article 10 of the Social Charter) and to add the principle of free compulsory education. 
Zdelo se je smiselno ta člen razširiti na dostop do poklicnega in nadaljnjega usposabljanja (glej točko 14 Listine Skupnosti o temeljnih socialnih pravicah delavcev in člen 10 Socialne listine) in dodati načelo brezplačnega obveznega šolanja.
As it is worded, the latter principle merely implies that as regards compulsory education, each child has the possibility of attending an establishment which offers free education. 
Besedilo slednjega pomeni zgolj, da ima pri obveznem šolanju vsak otrok možnost obiskovanja ustanove, ki ponuja brezplačno izobraževanje.
It does not require all establishments which provide education or vocational and continuing training, in particular private ones, to be free of charge. 
To ne zahteva, da so vse ustanove, ki ponujajo izobraževanje ali poklicno in nadaljnje izobraževanje, zlasti zasebne, brezplačne.
Nor does it exclude certain specific forms of education having to be paid for, if the State takes measures to grant financial compensation. 
Prav tako ne izključuje, da je treba nekatere posebne oblike izobraževanja plačevati, če države sprejmejo ukrepe, ki zagotavljajo finančno nadomestilo.
Insofar as the Charter applies to the Union, this means that in its training policies the Union must respect free compulsory education, but this does not, of course, create new powers. 
V meri, v kakršni Listina velja za Unijo, to pomeni, da mora Unija pri svojih politikah usposabljanja spoštovati brezplačno obvezno šolanje, vendar to seveda ne vzpostavlja novih pristojnosti.
Regarding the right of parents, it must be interpreted in conjunction with the provisions of Article 24. 
Glede pravice staršev jo je treba razlagati v povezavi z določbami člena 24.
Freedom to found public or private educational establishments is guaranteed as one of the aspects of freedom to conduct a business but it is limited by respect for democratic principles and is exercised in accordance with the arrangements defined by national legislation. 
Pravica ustanavljanja javnih ali zasebnih izobraževalnih ustanov je zagotovljena kot eden od vidikov pravice do gospodarske pobude, vendar je omejena s spoštovanjem demokratičnih načel in se jo izvaja v skladu z ureditvami, ki jih določa nacionalna zakonodaja.
Freedom to choose an occupation, as enshrined in Article 15(1), is recognised in Court of Justice case law (see inter alia judgment of 14 May 1974, Case 4/73 Nold [1974] ECR 491, paragraphs 12 to 14 of the grounds; judgment of 13 December 1979, Case 44/79 Hauer [1979] ECR 3727; judgment of 8 October 1986, Case 234/85 Keller [1986] ECR 2897, paragraph 8 of the grounds). 
Pravico do izbire poklica, kot je zagotovljena v prvem odstavku člena 15, priznava sodna praksa Sodišča (glej med drugim sodbo z dne 14. maja 1974, zadeva 4/73 Nold, 1974, PSES 491, odstavki 12 do 14 obrazložitve, sodba z dne 13. decembra 1979, zadeva 44/79 Hauer, 1979, PSES 3727, sodba z dne 8. oktobra 1986, zadeva 234/85 Keller, 1986, PSES 2897, odstavek 8 obrazložitve).
This paragraph also draws upon Article 1(2) of the European Social Charter, which was signed on 18 October 1961 and has been ratified by all the Member States, and on point 4 of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers of 9 December 1989. The expression &quot;working conditions&quot; is to be understood in the sense of Article III-213 of the Constitution. 
Ta odstavek se prav tako sklicuje na drugi odstavek člena 1 Evropske socialne listine, ki je bila podpisana 18. oktobra 1961 in so jo ratificirale vse države članice, ter na točko 4 Listine Skupnosti o temeljnih socialnih pravicah delavcev z dne 9. decembra 1989. Izraz »delovni pogoji« je treba razumeti v smislu III-213. člena Ustave.
Paragraph 2 deals with the three freedoms guaranteed by Articles I-4 and III-133, III-137 and III-144 of the Constitution, namely freedom of movement for workers, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services. 
Drugi odstavek obravnava tri pravice, ki jih zagotavljajo I-4., III-133., III-137. in III-144. členi Ustave, to so pravica do prostega gibanja delavcev, pravica do ustanavljanja in pravica opravljanja storitev.
Paragraph 3 has been based on TEC Article 137(3), fourth indent, now replaced by Article III-210(1)(g) of the Constitution, and on Article 19(4) of the European Social Charter signed on 18 October 1961 and ratified by all the Member States. 
Tretji odstavek temelji na četrti alinei člena 137(3) PES, ki jo je sedaj nadomestila točka g prvega odstavka III-210. člena, ter na členu 19(4) Evropske socialne listine, ki je bila podpisana 18. oktobra 1961 in so jo ratificirale vse države članice.
Article 52(2) of the Charter is therefore applicable. 
Drugi odstavek člena 52 Listine se zato uporablja.
The question of recruitment of seamen having the nationality of third States for the crews of vessels flying the flag of a Member State of the Union is governed by Union law and national legislation and practice. 
Vprašanje novačenja mornarjev z državljanstvom tretjih držav za člane posadk plovil pod zastavo države članice Unije ureja zakonodaja Unije ter nacionalna zakonodaja in praksa.
Freedom to conduct a business 
Svoboda gospodarske pobude
This Article is based on Court of Justice case law which has recognised freedom to exercise an economic or commercial activity (see judgments of 14 May 1974, Case 4/73 Nold [1974] ECR 491, paragraph 14 of the grounds, and of 27 September 1979, Case 230-78 SPA Eridiana and others [1979] ECR 2749, paragraphs 20 and 31 of the grounds) and freedom of contract (see inter alia Sukkerfabriken Nykobing judgment, Case 151/78 [1979] ECR 1, paragraph 19 of the grounds, and judgment of 5 October 1999, C-240/97 Spain v. Commission, [1999] ECR I-6571, paragraph 99 of the grounds) and Article I-3(2) of the Constitution, which recognises free competition. 
Ta člen temelji na sodni praksi Sodišča, ki je priznalo pravico do izvajanja gospodarske ali trgovske dejavnosti (glej med drugim sodbi z dne 14. maja 1974, zadeva 4/73 Nold, 1974, PSES 491, odstavek 14 obrazložitve, in z dne 27. septembra 1979, zadeva 230-78 SPA Eridiana in drugi, 1979, PSES 2749, odstavka metricconverterProductID20 in20 in 31 obrazložitve) in pravico do sklepanja pogodb (glej med drugim sodbo Sukkerfabriken Nykobing, zadeva 151/78, 1979, PSES 1, odstavek 19 obrazložitve, in sodbo z dne 5. oktobra 1999, C-240/97 Španija proti Komisiji, 1999, PSES I-6571, odstavek 99 obrazložitve), ter na drugem odstavku I-3. člena, ki priznava svobodno konkurenco.
Of course, this right is to be exercised with respect for Union law and national legislation. 
Seveda se to pravico izvaja ob spoštovanju zakonodaje Unije in nacionalne zakonodaje.
It may be subject to the limitations provided for in Article 52(1) of the Charter. 
Lahko je predmet omejitev, predvidenih v prvem odstavku člena 52 Listine.
This Article is based on Article 1 of the Protocol to the ECHR: 
Ta člen temelji na 1. členu Protokola k EKČP:
&quot;Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. 
»Vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba ima pravico do spoštovanja svojega premoženja.
The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties.&quot; 
Ta določba pa nikakor ne omejuje pravice držav, da uveljavijo zakone, za katere menijo, da so potrebni za nadzor nad uporabo premoženja v skladu s splošnim interesom ali za zagotovitev plačila davkov, drugih prispevkov ali denarnih kazni.«
This is a fundamental right common to all national constitutions. 
To je temeljna pravica, skupna vsem nacionalnim ustavam.
It has been recognised on numerous occasions by the case law of the Court of Justice, initially in the Hauer judgment (13 December 1979, ECR [1979] 3727). 
Sodišče jo je v svoji sodni praksi večkrat priznalo, najprej v sodbi Hauer (13. decembra 1979, PSES [1979] 3727).
The wording has been updated but, in accordance with Article 52(3), the meaning and scope of the right are the same as those of the right guaranteed by the ECHR and the limitations may not exceed those provided for there. 
Besedilo je bilo posodobljeno, vendar sta, v skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine, pomen in področje uporabe enaka tistima iz pravice, ki jo zagotavlja EKČP in omejitve ne smejo presegati tistih, ki so predvidene tam.
Protection of intellectual property, one aspect of the right of property, is explicitly mentioned in paragraph 2 because of its growing importance and Community secondary legislation. 
Varovanje intelektualne lastnine, ki je en vidik lastninske pravice, je zaradi vedno večjega pomena in zaradi sekundarne zakonodaje Unije posebej omenjeno v drugem odstavku.
Intellectual property covers not only literary and artistic property but also inter alia patent and trademark rights and associated rights. 
Intelektualna lastnina ne vključuje zgolj literarne in umetnostne lastnine, temveč med drugim tudi patentne pravice, pravice blagovne znamke in povezane pravice.
The guarantees laid down in paragraph 1 shall apply as appropriate to intellectual property. 
Zagotovila iz prvega odstavka se smiselno uporabljajo za intelektualno lastnino.
The text of the Article has been based on TEC Article 63, now replaced by Article III-266 of the Constitution, which requires the Union to respect the Geneva Convention on refugees. 
Besedilo člena temelji na členu 63 PES, ki ga je sedaj nadomestil III-266. člen, ki Uniji nalaga, da spoštuje Ženevsko konvencijo o beguncih.
Reference should be made to the Protocols relating to the United Kingdom and Ireland annexed to the [Treaty of Amsterdam] Constitution and to Denmark to determine the extent to which those Member States implement Union law in this area and the extent to which this Article is applicable to them. 
Primerno je sklicevati se na protokol o Združenem kraljestvu in Irski, ki je priložen Ustavi in o Danski, da se določi, v kolikšnem obsegu te države članice izvajajo zakonodajo Unije na tem področju in v kolikšnem obsegu ta člen velja zanje.
This Article is in line with the Protocol on Asylum annexed to the Constitution. 
Ta člen je usklajen s Protokolom o azilu, ki je priložen Ustavi.
Paragraph 1 of this Article has the same meaning and scope as Article 4 of Protocol No 4 to the ECHR concerning collective expulsion. 
Prvi odstavek tega člena ima enak pomen in področje uporabe kot 4. člen Protokola št. 4 k EKČP glede kolektivnega izgona.
Its purpose is to guarantee that every decision is based on a specific examination and that no single measure can be taken to expel all persons having the nationality of a particular State (see also Article 13 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights). 
Njegov namen je zagotoviti, da je vsaka odločitev utemeljena na posebni obravnavi in da z enim ukrepom ni mogoče izgnati vseh oseb, ki imajo državljanstvo posamezne države (glej tudi člen 13 Pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah).
Paragraph 2 incorporates the relevant case law from the European Court of Human Rights regarding Article 3 of the ECHR (see Ahmed v. Austria, judgment of 17 December 1996, [1996] ECR VI-2206 and Soering, judgment of 7 July 1989). 
Drugi odstavek vključuje ustrezno sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice glede 3. člena EKČP (glej Ahmed proti Avstriji, sodba z dne 17. decembra 1996, [1996] PSES VI-2206 in Soering, sodba z dne 7. julija 1989).
This Article corresponds to a general principle of law which is included in all European constitutions and has also been recognised by the Court of Justice as a basic principle of Community law (judgment of 13 November 1984, Case 283/83 Racke [1984] ECR 3791, judgment of 17 April 1997, Case 15/95 EARL [1997] ECR I?1961, and judgment of 13 April 2000, Case 292/97 Karlsson [2000] ECR 2737). 
Ta člen ustreza splošnemu pravnemu načelu, ki je vključen v vse evropske ustave in ga je tudi Sodišče priznalo kot osnovno načelo prava Skupnosti (sodba z dne 13. novembra 1984, zadeva 283/83 Racke, [1984] PSES 3791, sodba z dne 17. aprila 1997, zadeva 15/95 EARL, [1997] PSES I- metricconverterProductID1961 in1961 in sodba z dne 13. aprila 2000, zadeva 292/97 Karlsson, [2000] PSES 2737).
Paragraph 1 draws on Article 13 of the EC Treaty, now replaced by Article III-124 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the ECHR and Article 11 of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine as regards genetic heritage. 
Prvi odstavek glede genetske dediščine izhaja iz člena 13 Pogodbe ES, ki ga je sedaj nadomestil III-124. člen, 14. člena EKČP in 11. člena Konvencije o človekovih pravicah v zvezi z biomedicino.
Insofar as this corresponds to Article 14 of the ECHR, it applies in compliance with it. 
Če ustreza 14. členu EKČP, se uporablja v skladu s slednjim.
There is no contradiction or incompatibility between paragraph 1 and Article III-124 of the Constitution which has a different scope and purpose: 
Med prvim odstavkom in III-124. členom ni neskladja ali nezdružljivosti, saj ima slednji drugo področje uporabe in namen:
Article III-124 confers power on the Union to adopt legislative acts, including harmonisation of the Member States&apos; laws and regulations, to combat certain forms of discrimination, listed exhaustively in that Article. 
III-124. člen Uniji dodeljuje pristojnost, da sprejema zakonodajne akte, vključno z usklajevanjem zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic za boj proti nekaterim oblikam diskriminacije, ki so izčrpno naštete v tem členu.
Such legislation may cover action of Member State authorities (as well as relations between private individuals) in any area within the limits of the Union&apos;s powers. 
Taka zakonodaja lahko vključuje dejavnosti organov držav članic (kot tudi odnose med posamezniki) na vseh področjih v okviru pristojnosti Unije.
In contrast, the provision in paragraph 1 does not create any power to enact anti-discrimination laws in these areas of Member State or private action, nor does it lay down a sweeping ban of discrimination in such wide-ranging areas. 
V nasprotju s tem pa določbe prvega odstavka člena 21 ne vzpostavljajo nobenih pooblastil za uzakonitev protidiskriminacijskih zakonov na tem področju delovanja držav članic ali posameznikov, niti ne določajo splošne prepovedi diskriminacije na tako širokih področjih.
Instead, it only addresses discriminations by the institutions and bodies of the Union themselves, when exercising powers conferred under other articles of Parts I and III of the Constitution, and by Member States only when they are implementing Union law. 
Namesto tega se nanašajo zgolj na diskriminacijo s strani samih institucij in teles Unije, kadar izvajajo pristojnosti, dodeljene po drugih členih I. in III. dela Ustave, in s strani držav članic, ko izvajajo zakonodajo Unije.
Paragraph 1 therefore does not alter the extent of powers granted under Article III-124 nor the interpretation given to that Article. 
Prvi odstavek torej ne spreminja obsega pristojnosti iz III-124. člena niti ne razlage tega člena.
Paragraph 2 corresponds to Article I-4(2) of the Constitution and must be applied in compliance with that Article. 
Drugi odstavek ustreza drugemu odstavku I-4. člena in ga je treba uporabljati ob upoštevanju tega člena.
This Article has been based on Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and on Article 151(1) and (4) of the EC Treaty, now replaced by Article III-280(1) and (4) of the Constitution, concerning culture. 
Ta člen temelji na členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in na členu 151(1) in (4) Pogodbe o ES, ki sta ju sedaj nadomestila prvi in četrti odstavek III-280. člena, ki se nanašata na kulturo.
Respect for cultural and linguistic diversity is now also laid down in Article I-3(3) of the Constitution. 
Spoštovanje kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti je sedaj zapisano tudi tretjem odstavku I-3. člena Ustave.
The Article is also inspired by Declaration No 11 to the Final Act of the Amsterdam Treaty on the status of churches and non-confessional organisations, now taken over in Article I-52 of the Constitution. 
Ta člen se prav tako zgleduje po izjavi št. 11 sklepne listine Amsterdamske pogodbe o statusu cerkva in nekonfesionalnih organizacij, ki je sedaj prevzeta v I-52. člen Ustave.
The first paragraph has been based on Articles 2 and 3(2) of the EC Treaty, now replaced by Articles I-3 and III-116 of the Constitution which impose the objective of promoting equality between men and women on the Union, and on Article 141(1) of the EC Treaty, now replaced by Article III-214(1) of the Constitution. 
Prvi odstavek temelji na členih 2 in 3(2) Pogodbe ES, ki sta ju sedaj nadomestila I-3. in III-116. člen Ustave, ki Uniji zastavljata cilj spodbujati enakost med ženskami in moškimi, ter na členu 141(1) Pogodbe ES, ki ga je sedaj nadomestil prvi odstavek III-214. člena.
It draws on Article 20 of the revised European Social Charter of 3 May 1996 and on point 16 of the Community Charter on the rights of workers. 
Izhaja iz člena 20 Evropske socialne listine (spremenjene) z dne 3. maja 1996 in iz točke 16 iz Listine Skupnosti o pravicah delavcev.
It is also based on Article 141(3) of the EC Treaty, now replaced by Article III-214(3) of the Constitution, and Article 2(4) of Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions. 
Prav tako temelji na členu 141(3) Pogodbe ES, ki ga je sedaj nadomestil tretji odstavek III-214. člena, in na členu 2(4) Direktive Sveta 76/207/EGS o izvrševanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk v zvezi z dostopom do zaposlitve, poklicnega izobraževanja in napredovanja ter delovnih pogojev.
The second paragraph takes over in shorter form Article III-214(4) of the Constitution which provides that the principle of equal treatment does not prevent the maintenance or adoption of measures providing for specific advantages in order to make it easier for the under-represented sex to pursue a vocational activity or to prevent or compensate for disadvantages in professional careers. 
Drugi odstavek na kratko povzema četrti odstavek III-214. člena, ki določa, da načelo enakega obravnavanja ne preprečuje ohranitve ali sprejetja ukrepov o specifičnih ugodnostih, s katerimi se nezadostno zastopanemu spolu olajša opravljanje poklicne dejavnosti ali prepreči ali izravna neugoden položaj v poklicni karieri.
In accordance with Article 52(2), the present paragraph does not amend Article III-214(4). 
V skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 52 Listine ta odstavek ne spreminja četrtega odstavka III-214. člena.
This Article is based on the New York Convention on the Rights of the Child signed on 20 November 1989 and ratified by all the Member States, particularly Articles 3, 9, 12 and 13 thereof. 
Ta člen temelji na newyorški Konvenciji o otrokovih pravicah, ki je bila podpisana 20. novembra 1989 in so jo ratificirale vse države članice, zlasti na 3., 9., 12. in 13. členu te konvencije.
Paragraph 3 takes account of the fact that, as part of the establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice, Union legislation on civil matters having cross-border implications, for which Article III-269 of the Constitution confers power, may include notably visiting rights ensuring that children can maintain on a regular basis a personal and direct contact with both his or her parents. 
Tretji odstavek upošteva dejstvo, da zakonodaja Unije o civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami, katere pristojnosti izhajajo iz III-269. člena, lahko kot del oblikovanja območja svobode, varnosti in pravice vključuje tudi pravico do obiska, s katero se zagotovi, da lahko otrok redno vzdržuje osebni in neposredni stik z obema staršema.
This Article draws on Article 23 of the revised European Social Charter and Articles 24 and 25 of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers. 
Ta člen izhaja iz člena 23 Evropske socialne listine (spremenjene) in iz členov 24 in 25 Listine Skupnosti o temeljnih socialnih pravicah delavcev.
Of course, participation in social and cultural life also covers participation in political life. 
Seveda sodelovanje v družbenem in kulturnem življenju vključuje tudi sodelovanje v političnem življenju.
The principle set out in this Article is based on Article 15 of the European Social Charter and also draws on point 26 of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers. 
Načelo tega člena temelji na členu 15 Evropske socialne listine in izhaja tudi iz točke 26 Listine Skupnosti o temeljnih socialnih pravicah delavcev.
This Article appears in the revised European Social Charter (Article 21) and in the Community Charter on the rights of workers (points 17 and 18). 
Ta člen se pojavi v Evropski socialni listini (spremenjeni) (člen 21) in v Listini Skupnosti o pravicah delavcev (točki 17 in 18).
It applies under the conditions laid down by Union law and by national laws. 
Velja ob pogojih, kot jih določa pravo Unije in nacionalne zakonodaje.
The reference to appropriate levels refers to the levels laid down by Union law or by national laws and practices, which might include the European level when Union legislation so provides. 
Sklicevanje na ustrezne ravni se nanaša na ravni, kot jih določa pravo Unije ali nacionalne zakonodaje in prakse, ki lahko vključujejo evropsko raven, kadar tako določa zakonodaja Unije.
There is a considerable Union acquis in this field: 
To področje v veliki meri ureja pravni red Unije: