natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
&quot;A State may make provision in its law for the death penalty in respect of acts committed in time of war or of imminent threat of war; such penalty shall be applied only in the instances laid down in the law and in accordance with its provisions…&quot; 
»Država lahko določi v svoji zakonodaji smrtno kazen za dejanja, storjena med vojno ali ob neposredni vojni nevarnosti; takšna kazen se sme uporabiti le v primerih, ki so določeni v zakonu in v skladu z določbami zakona..«
In its judgment of 9 October 2001 in case C-377/98 Netherlands v. European Parliament and Council, 2001 ECR 7079, at grounds No 70, 78? 80, the Court of Justice confirmed that a fundamental right to human integrity is part of Union law and encompasses, in the context of medicine and biology, the free and informed consent of the donor and recipient. 
V svoji sodbi z dne 9. oktobra 2001 v zadevi C-377/98 Nizozemska proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, 2001, PSES 7079, obrazložitev v točkah št. 70, 78? 80, je Sodišče potrdilo, da je temeljna pravica človekovega dostojanstva del prava Unije in vključuje, v okviru medicine in biologije, svobodno privolitev po predhodni seznanitvi darovalca in prejemnika.
The principles of Article 3 of the Charter are already included in the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, adopted by the Council of Europe (ETS 164 and additional protocol ETS 168). 
Načela člena 3 Listine so že vključena v Konvencijo o človekovih pravicah v zvezi z biomedicino, ki jo je sprejel Svet Evrope (ETS 164 in dodatni protokol ETS 168).
The Charter does not set out to depart from those principles, and therefore prohibits only reproductive cloning. 
Listine se ne oddaljuje od teh načel in zato prepoveduje le reproduktivno kloniranje.
It neither authorises nor prohibits other forms of cloning. 
Drugih oblik kloniranja niti ne odobrava niti ne prepoveduje.
Thus it does not in any way prevent the legislature from prohibiting other forms of cloning. 
Zato na noben način zakonodajnim telesom ne preprečuje prepovedi drugih oblik kloniranja.
The reference to eugenic practices, in particular those aiming at the selection of persons, relates to possible situations in which selection programmes are organised and implemented, involving campaigns for sterilisation, forced pregnancy, compulsory ethnic marriage among others, all acts deemed to be international crimes in the Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted in Rome on 17 July 1998 (see its Article 7(1)(g)). 
Sklicevanje na evgenične postopke, zlasti tiste, katerih cilj je selekcija ljudi, se nanaša na morebitne razmere, v katerih bi se organizirali in izvajali selekcijski programi, ki bi med drugim vključevali sterilizacijske kampanje, prisilne nosečnosti, obvezne etnične poroke, kar so vse dejanja, ki se po statutu Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, sprejetem v Rimu 17. julija 1998 (glej njegovo točko g), prvega odstavka 7. člena), štejejo za mednarodna kazniva dejanja.
The right in Article 4 is the right guaranteed by Article 3 of the ECHR, which has the same wording: &quot;No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment&quot;. 
Pravica v členu 4 je pravica, zagotovljena s 3. členom EKČP, ki ima enako besedilo: »Nikogar se ne sme mučiti ali nečloveško in ponižujoče z njim ravnati ali ga kaznovati.«
By virtue of Article 52(3) of the Charter, it therefore has the same meaning and the same scope as the ECHR Article. 
Zato ima na podlagi tretjega odstavka člena 52 Listine enak pomen in področje uporabe kot člen EKČP.
The right in Article 5(1) and (2) corresponds to Article 4(1) and (2) of the ECHR, which has the same wording. 
Pravica v prvem in drugem odstavku člena 5 ustreza prvemu in drugemu odstavku 4. člena EKČP, ki ima enako besedilo.
It therefore has the same meaning and scope as the ECHR Article, by virtue of Article 52(3) of the Charter. 
Zato ima v skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine enak pomen in področje uporabe kot člen EKČP.
Consequently: 
Zaradi tega:
? no limitation may legitimately affect the right provided for in paragraph 1; 
? nobena omejitev ne more legitimno vplivati na pravico, zagotovljeno v prvem odstavku;
? in paragraph 2, &quot;forced or compulsory labour&quot; must be understood in the light of the &quot;negative&quot; definitions contained in Article 4(3) of the ECHR: 
? v drugem odstavku je treba »prisilno ali obvezno delo« razumeti v luči »negativnih« opredelitev iz tretjega odstavka 4. člena EKČP:
&quot;For the purpose of this article the term &quot;forced or compulsory labour&quot; shall not include: 
»Pojem prisilno ali obvezno delo v zvezi s tem členom ne vključuje:
(a) any work required to be done in the ordinary course of detention imposed according to the provisions of Article 5 of this Convention or during conditional release from such detention; 
a) dela, ki se zahteva pri rednem prestajanju zapora v skladu z določbami 5. člena te Konvencije ali med pogojnim odpustom s prestajanja zaporne kazni,
(b) any service of a military character or, in case of conscientious objectors in countries where they are recognised, service exacted instead of compulsory military service; 
b) katerekoli službe vojaške narave, službe, ki jo zahtevajo namesto obveznega služenja vojske v državah v katerih je ugovor vesti dopusten,
(c) any service exacted in case of an emergency or calamity threatening the life or well-being of the community; 
c) službe, ki je komu dodeljena ob nevarnosti ali ob nesreči, ko je ogroženo življenje ljudi ali blaginja skupnosti,
(d) any work or service which forms part of normal civic obligations.&quot; 
d) del ali služb, ki so sestavni del običajnih državljanskih dolžnosti.«
Paragraph 3 stems directly from human dignity and takes account of recent developments in organised crime, such as the organisation of lucrative illegal immigration or sexual exploitation networks. 
Tretji odstavek izvira neposredno iz človekovega dostojanstva in upošteva nedavni razvoj organiziranega kriminala, kot so mreže organizacij pridobitniškega nezakonitega priseljevanja ali spolnega izkoriščanja.
The annex to the Europol Convention contains the following definition which refers to trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation: 
Priloga h Konvenciji Europol vsebuje naslednje opredelitve, ki se nanašajo na trgovino z namenom spolnega izkoriščanja:
&quot;traffic in human beings: means subjection of a person to the real and illegal sway of other persons by using violence or menaces or by abuse of authority or intrigue with a view to the exploitation of prostitution, forms of sexual exploitation and assault of minors or trade in abandoned children&quot;. 
»trgovina z ljudmi pomeni izpostavljanje osebe pravemu in nezakonitemu vplivu drugih oseb z uporabo nasilja ali groženj ali z zlorabo oblasti ali intrigo z namenom izkoriščanja prostitucije, oblik spolnega izkoriščanja in zlorabe mladoletnikov ali trgovine z zapuščenimi otroki«.
Chapter VI of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, which has been integrated into the Union&apos;s acquis, in which the United Kingdom and Ireland participate, contains the following wording in Article 27(1) which refers to illegal immigration networks: 
Poglavje 6 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma, ki je bilo vključeno v pravni red Unije, v katerem sodelujeta Združeno kraljestvo in Irska, v členu 27(1) vsebuje naslednje besedilo, ki se nanaša na mreže za nezakonito priseljevanje:
&quot; The Contracting Parties undertake to impose appropriate penalties on any person who, for financial gain, assists or tries to assist an alien to enter or reside within the territory of one of the Contracting Parties in breach of that Contracting Party&apos;s laws on the entry and residence of aliens.&quot; 
»Pogodbenice ustrezno kaznujejo osebo, ki zaradi dobička tujcu pomaga ali poskuša pomagati vstopiti ali prebivati na ozemlju ene od pogodbenic v nasprotju z zakonodajo te pogodbenice o vstopu in prebivanju tujcev.«
On 19 July 2002, the Council adopted a framework decision on combating trafficking in human beings (OJ L 203/1) whose Article 1 defines in detail the offences concerning trafficking in human beings for the purposes of labour exploitation or sexual exploitation, which the Member States must make punishable by virtue of that framework decision. 
Svet je 19. julija 2002 sprejel okvirni sklep (2002/629/PNZ) o boju proti trgovanju z ljudmi (UL L 203, str. 1), ki v členu 1 podrobno opredeljuje kazniva dejanja v zvezi s trgovanjem z ljudmi za namene izkoriščanja delovne sile ali spolnega izkoriščanja, za katere morajo države članice na podlagi tega okvirnega sklepa zagotoviti, da so kazniva.
The rights in Article 6 are the rights guaranteed by Article 5 of the ECHR, and in accordance with Article 52(3) of the Charter, they have the same meaning and scope. 
Pravice v členu 6 so pravice, ki jih zagotavlja 5. člen EKČP in imajo v skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine enak pomen in področje uporabe.
Consequently, the limitations which may legitimately be imposed on them may not exceed those permitted by the ECHR, in the wording of Article 5: 
Zaradi tega omejitve, ki se jih zanje lahko legitimno uvede, ne smejo presegati omejitev, kot jih dovoljuje EKČP v besedilu 5. člena:
(a) the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court; 
a) zakonit pripor, odrejen s sodbo pristojnega sodišča,
(b) the lawful arrest or detention of a person for non-compliance with the lawful order of a court or in order to secure the fulfilment of any obligation prescribed by law; 
b) zakonit odvzem prostosti osebi, ki se ne pokori zakoniti odločbi sodišča, ali zato, da bi zagotovili izpolnitev kakšne z zakonom naložene obveznosti,
(c) the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so; 
c) zakonit odvzem prostosti, ki je potreben zato, da bi osebo privedli pred pristojno sodno oblast ob utemeljenem sumu, da je storila kaznivo dejanje, ali kadar je to utemeljeno nujno zato, da bi preprečili storitev kaznivega dejanja ali beg po storjenem kaznivem dejanju,
(d) the detention of a minor by lawful order for the purpose of educational supervision or his lawful detention for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority; 
d) pridržanje mladoletnika na podlagi zakonite odločbe zaradi vzgojnega nadzorstva ali zakonit odvzem prostosti mladoletniku zato, da bi ga privedli pred pristojno oblast,
(e) the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases, of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants; 
e) zakonito pridržanje oseb, da bi preprečili širjenje nalezljivih bolezni, ali duševno bolnih oseb, alkoholikov, narkomanov in potepuhov,
(f) the lawful arrest or detention of a person to prevent his effecting an unauthorised entry into the country or of a person against whom action is being taken with a view to deportation or extradition. 
f) zakonit odvzem prostosti osebi z namenom, da bi ji preprečili nedovoljen vstop v državo, ali pripor osebe, proti kateri teče postopek za izgon ali za izročitev.
Everyone who is arrested shall be informed promptly, in a language which he understands, of the reasons for his arrest and of any charge against him. 
2) Ob odvzemu prostosti je treba vsakogar takoj poučiti v jeziku, ki ga razume, o vzrokih za odvzem prostosti in česa ga dolžijo.
Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1.c of this article shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial. 
Vsakogar, ki mu je bila odvzeta prostost v skladu z določbami tč. c 1. odstavka tega člena, je treba takoj privesti pred sodnika ali drugo uradno osebo, ki na podlagi zakona izvršuje sodno oblast; vsakdo ima pravico, da mu sodijo v razumen roku ali ga izpustijo.
Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his release ordered if the detention is not lawful. 
4) Vsakdo, ki mu je bila odvzeta prostost, ima pravico začeti postopek, v katerem bo sodišče hitro odločilo o zakonitosti odvzema prostosti in odredilo njegovo izpustitev, če je bil odvzem prostosti nezakonit.
Everyone who has been the victim of arrest or detention in contravention of the provisions of this Article shall have an enforceable right to compensation.&quot; 
Kdor je bil žrtev odvzema prostosti v nasprotju z določili tega člena, ima iztožljivo pravico do odškodnine.«
The rights enshrined in Article 6 must be respected particularly when the European Parliament and the Council adopt laws and framework laws in the area of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, on the basis of Articles III-270, III-271 and III-273 of the Constitution, notably to define common minimum provisions as regards the categorisation of offences and punishments and certain aspects of procedural law. 
Pravice, zapisane v členu 6, je treba spoštovati, zlasti kadar Evropski parlament in Sveta sprejemata zakone in okvirne zakone na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah na podlagi III-270., III-271. in III-273. člena Ustave, predvsem, da se določijo najmanjše skupne določbe o kategorizaciji kršitev in kazni ter nekateri vidiki procesnega prava.
The rights guaranteed in Article 7 correspond to those guaranteed by Article 8 of the ECHR. 
Pravice, zagotovljene s členom 7 ustrezajo pravicam, zagotovljenim z 8. členom EKČP.
To take account of developments in technology the word &quot;correspondence&quot; has been replaced by &quot;communications&quot;. 
Zaradi upoštevanja tehnološkega razvoja je bila beseda »dopisovanje« zamenjana z »komunikacijami«.
In accordance with Article 52(3), the meaning and scope of this right are the same as those of the corresponding article of the ECHR. 
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 sta pomen in področje uporabe te pravice enaka kot v ustreznem členu EKČP.
Consequently, the limitations which may legitimately be imposed on this right are the same as those allowed by Article 8 of the ECHR: 
Zaradi tega so omejitve, ki se jih lahko legitimno uvede na to pravico, enake tistim, kot jih dovoljuje 8. člen EKČP:
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 
1) Vsakdo ima pravico do spoštovanja svojega zasebnega in družinskega življenja, svojega doma in dopisovanja.
This Article has been based on Article 286 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23. 11. 1995) as well as on Article 8 of the ECHR and on the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, which has been ratified by all the Member States. 
Ta člen temelji na členu 286 Pogodbe o ES in Direktivi 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 281, 23. 11. 1995, str. 31), kot tudi na 8. členu EKČP in na Konvenciji Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki so jo ratificirale vse države članice.
Article 286 EC Treaty is now replaced by Article I-51 of the Constitution. 
Člen 286 Pogodbe ES je sedaj nadomestil I-51. člen Ustave.
Reference is also made to Regulation No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12. 1. 2001). 
Prav tako je vključeno sklicevanje na Uredbo ES št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 8, 12. 1. 2002, str.
The abovementioned Directive and Regulation contain conditions and limitations for the exercise of the right to the protection of personal data. 
Zgoraj omenjeni direktiva in uredba vsebujeta pogoje in omejitve pri izvajanju pravice do varovanja osebnih podatkov.
This Article is based on Article 12 of the ECHR, which reads as follows: 
Ta člen temelji na 12. členu EKČP, ki se glasi:
&quot;Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family according to the national laws governing the exercising of this right.&quot; 
»Moški in ženske, zreli za zakon, imajo pravico skleniti zakonsko zvezo in ustanoviti družino v skladu z domačimi zakoni, ki urejajo uveljavljanje te pravice.«
The wording of the Article has been modernised to cover cases in which national legislation recognises arrangements other than marriage for founding a family. 
Besedilo tega člena je bilo posodobljeno tako, da vključuje primere, kjer nacionalna zakonodaja priznava ureditve, ki niso poroka za oblikovanje družine.
This Article neither prohibits nor imposes the granting of the status of marriage to unions between people of the same sex. 
Ta člen niti ne prepoveduje niti ne zagotavlja statusa poroke zvezam med človekoma istega spola.
This right is thus similar to that afforded by the ECHR, but its scope may be wider when national legislation so provides. 
Ta pravica je torej podobna tisti, ki jo daje EKČP, vendar pa je njeno področje uporabe lahko širše, kadar tako določa nacionalna zakonodaja.
The right guaranteed in paragraph 1 corresponds to the right guaranteed in Article 9 of the ECHR and, in accordance with Article 52(3) of the Charter, has the same meaning and scope. 
Pravica, zagotovljena v prvem odstavku ustreza pravici, ki jo zagotavlja 9. člen EKČP in ima, v skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine, enak pomen in področje uporabe.
Limitations must therefore respect Article 9(2) of the Convention, which reads as follows: 
Omejitve morajo v ta namen upoštevati drugi odstavek 9. člena EKČP, ki se glasi:
&quot;Freedom to manifest one&apos;s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.&quot; 
»Svoboda izpovedovanja vere ali prepričanja se sme omejiti samo v primerih, ki jih določa zakon, in če je to nujno v demokratični družbi zaradi javne varnosti, za zaščito javnega reda, zdravja ali morale ali zaradi varstva pravic in svoboščin drugih ljudi.«
The right guaranteed in paragraph 2 corresponds to national constitutional traditions and to the development of national legislation on this issue. 
Pravica, zagotovljena v drugem odstavku, ustreza nacionalnim ustavnim tradicijam in razvoju nacionalne zakonodaje na tem področju.
Article 11 corresponds to Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which reads as follows: 
Člen 11 ustreza 10. členu EKČP, ki se glasi:
This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises. 
Ta člen ne preprečuje državam, da zahtevajo dovoljenje za delo radijskih, televizijskih in kinematografskih podjetij.
The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.&quot; 
Izvrševanje teh svoboščin vključuje tudi dolžnosti in odgovornosti in je zato lahko podvrženo obličnostim pogojem, omejitvam ali kaznim, ki jih določa zakon in ki so nujne v demokratični družbi zaradi varnosti države, njene ozemeljske celovitosti, zaradi javne varnosti, preprečevanja neredov ali zločinov, za zavarovanje zdravja ali morale, za zavarovanje ugleda ali pravic drugih ljudi, za preprečitev razkritja zaupnih informacij ali za varovanje avtoritete in nepristranskosti sodstva.«
Pursuant to Article 52(3) of the Charter, the meaning and scope of this right are the same as those guaranteed by the ECHR. 
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine sta pomen in področje uporabe te pravice enaka tistima, ki ju zagotavlja EKČP.
The limitations which may be imposed on it may therefore not exceed those provided for in Article 10(2) of the Convention, without prejudice to any restrictions which competition law of the Union may impose on Member States&apos; right to introduce the licensing arrangements referred to in the third sentence of Article 10(1) of the ECHR. 
Zato omejitve, ki se jih lahko uvede, ne smejo presegati omejitev iz drugega odstavka 10. člena Konvencije, ne glede na omejitve, ki jih zakonodaja o konkurenci v Uniji lahko nalaga državam članicam glede uvedbe dogovora o izdaji dovoljenj iz tretjega stavka prvega odstavka 10. člena. EKČP.
Paragraph 2 of this Article spells out the consequences of paragraph 1 regarding freedom of the media. 
Drugi odstavek tega člena poudarja posledice prvega odstavka za svobodo medijev.
It is based in particular on Court of Justice case law regarding television, particularly in case C-288/89 (judgment of 25 July 1991, Stichting Collectieve Antennevoorziening Gouda and others [1991] ECR I-4007), and on the Protocol on the system of public broadcasting in the Member States annexed to the EC Treaty and now to the Constitution, and on Council Directive 89/552/EC (particularly its seventeenth recital). 
Predvsem temelji na sodni praksi Sodišča o televiziji, zlasti na zadevi C-288/89 (sodba z dne 25. julija 1991 Stichting Collectieve Antennevoorziening Gouda in drugi [1991] PSES I-4007) in na Protokolu o sistemu javne radiotelevizije v državah članicah, ki je priloga Pogodbi ES in sedaj Ustavi, ter na Direktivi sveta 89/552/ES o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov (UL L 298, z dne 17. 10. 1989, str. 23) (zlasti njeni sedemnajsti uvodni izjavi).
Paragraph 1 of this Article corresponds to Article 11 of the ECHR, which reads as follows: 
Prvi odstavek tega člena ustreza 11. členu EKČP, ki se glasi:
Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests. 
1) Vsakdo ima pravico, da mirno zboruje in se svobodno združuje, vključno s pravico, da ustanavlja sindikate in se jim pridruži, da bi zavaroval svoje interese.
No restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. 
2) Izvrševanje teh pravic je mogoče omejiti samo z zakonom, če je to nujno v demokratični družbi zaradi državne ali javne varnosti, za preprečitev neredov ali zločinov, za zaščito zdravja ali morale ali za zavarovanje pravic in svoboščin drugih ljudi.
This article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of these rights by members of the armed forces, of the police or of the administration of the State.&quot; 
Ta člen ne preprečuje, da bi pripadnikom oboroženih sil, policije ali državne uprave z zakonom omejili izvrševanje teh pravic.«