natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(1) A misdemeanour judgement may also be challenged due to the decision on sanctions if, though the misdemeanour judgement has not transgressed the lawful right of the court to conduct proceedings, the court has failed to determine the sanction proportionately with the circumstances which affect the severity of the sanction. 
(1) Sodba o prekršku se sme izpodbijati zaradi odločitve o sankciji tudi tedaj, če z njo sicer ni bila prekoračena zakonita pravica sodišča, ki vodi postopek, vendar to sodišče ni pravilno odmerilo sankcije glede na okoliščine, ki vplivajo na to, ali naj bo sankcija večja ali manjša.
(2) In addition, the decision on sanctions may be challenged if the court in the first instance incorrectly applied the provisions governing admonitions, dismissal, non-imposition or exclusion of sanctions, or if it failed to apply these provisions although all legal conditions were in place for this. 
(2) Odločitev o sankciji se sme izpodbijati tudi zaradi tega, ker je sodišče prve stopnje nepravilno uporabilo določbe o opominu, o odpustitvi, neizreku ali o izključitvi sankcije ali ker teh določb ni uporabilo, čeprav so bili za to podani zakoniti pogoji.
(3) The decision on deprivation of a pecuniary advantage may also be challenged if, though this decision did not involve a violation of the substantive decisions of this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour, the court in the first instance issued the decision incorrectly or failed to impose deprivation of a pecuniary advantage although all legal conditions were in place for this. 
(3) Odločitev o odvzemu premoženjske koristi se sme izpodbijati tudi, če sicer ne gre za kršitev materialnopravnih določb tega zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek, pač pa je sodišče prve stopnje nepravilno izdalo to odločitev ali ni izreklo odvzema premoženjske koristi, čeprav so bili za to podani zakoniti pogoji.
(4) The decision on legal costs of the proceedings and pecuniary claim may be challenged if the court decided on these issues in contravention of the provisions of this Act. 
(4) Odločitev o stroških postopka in o premoženjskopravnem zahtevku se sme izpodbijati, če je sodišče o teh vprašanjih odločilo v nasprotju z določbami tega zakona.
Testing a misdemeanour judgement 
Preizkus sodbe o prekršku
The higher court shall test the part of the misdemeanour judgement which is challenged by the appeal, but it must also test, ex officio, whether a substantial violation has been committed of the provisions of misdemeanour proceedings referred to in points 1, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of paragraph1 of Article 155, and whether the substantive provisions of the Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour have been violated to the detriment of the accused person (Article 156 of this Act). 
Višje sodišče preizkusi sodbo o prekršku v tistem delu, v katerem se s pritožbo izpodbija, vendar mora vselej po uradni dolžnosti preizkusiti, ali je podana bistvena kršitev določb postopka o prekršku iz 1., 5., 6., 7. in 8. točke prvega odstavka 155. člena ter ali so bile v škodo obdolženca kršene materialne določbe zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek (156. člena tega zakona).
Limited reference to violations 
Omejeno sklicevanje na kršitve
The appellant may refer in his appeal to the legal violation specified in point 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 155 of this Act only if he could not draw attention to this violation during the misdemeanour proceedings, or if he drew attention to this violation but the court in the first instance failed to observe it. 
Na kršitev zakona iz 1. točke prvega odstavka 155. člena tega zakona se sme pritožnik sklicevati v pritožbi samo, če na kršitev ni mogel opozoriti med postopkom o prekršku, ali če je nanjo opozoril, pa je sodišče prve stopnje ni upoštevalo.
Late or impermissible appeal 
Prepozna ali nedovoljena pritožba
(1) An appeal shall be deemed to be late if it is lodged after expiry of the legal deadline. 
(1) Pritožba je prepozna, če je vložena po poteku zakonskega roka.
(2) An appeal shall be deemed to be impermissible if it has been lodged by a person who does not have the right to appeal or person who waived the right to appeal, if the appeal has been withdrawn or re-lodged after having been withdrawn, or if the appeal is not permitted pursuant to the law. 
(2) Pritožba je nedovoljena, če jo je podala oseba, ki nima pravice do pritožbe ali oseba, ki se je pritožbi odpovedala, če je bila pritožba umaknjena ali pa po umiku pritožbe ponovno vložena ali če pritožba po zakonu ni dovoljena.
(3) Late and impermissible appeals shall be dismissed by the court in the first instance by issuing an order. 
(3) Prepozno ali nedovoljeno pritožbo zavrže s sklepom sodišče prve stopnje.
The appellant shall have the right to lodge an appeal with a higher court against the order dismissing a late or impermissible appeal. 
Proti sklepu, s katerim je bila prepozna ali nedovoljena pritožba zavržena, ima pritožnik pravico do pritožbe na višje sodišče.
(4) The court in the first instance shall without delay send the appeal together with the relevant court record to the higher court in due time. 
(4) Sodišče prve stopnje pošlje pravočasno pritožbo s spisom brez odlašanja višjemu sodišču.
Indications of new facts and evidence 
Navedbe o novih dejstvih in dokazih
The reporting judge may check the indications of new facts and evidence specified in the appeal with the court which issued the misdemeanour judgement. 
O navedbah v pritožbi, ki se tičejo novih dokazov in novih dejstev, se lahko sodnik poročevalec prepriča preko sodišča, ki je izdalo sodbo o prekršku.
He may also obtain from this court a report on the violations of the provisions governing misdemeanour proceedings. 
Lahko pa si od tega sodišča preskrbi tudi poročilo o kršitvah določb postopka o prekršku.
Higher court&apos;s decisions regarding appeals 
Odločanje višjega sodišča o pritožbi
(1) The higher court shall issue an order to dismiss late or impermissible appeals, if this has not been already done by the court in the first instance. 
(1) Višje sodišče s sklepom zavrže prepozno ali nedovoljeno pritožbo, če tega ni storilo sodišče prve stopnje.
(2) The higher court may uphold, repeal or amend the misdemeanour judgement. 
(2) Višje sodišče lahko sodbo o prekršku potrdi, razveljavi ali spremeni.
(3) The higher court shall refuse an appeal as unfounded and issue a judgement upholding the judgement issued by the court in the first instance if it finds that the reasons for which the judgement is being challenged are not in place, and that there are no substantial violations of the provisions governing the proceedings to which the court must pay attention ex officio (Article 159). 
(3) Višje sodišče zavrne pritožbo kot neutemeljeno in s sodbo potrdi sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, če ugotovi, da niso podani razlogi, zaradi katerih se sodba izpodbija in tudi ne takšne bistvene kršitve določb postopka, na katere je treba paziti po uradni dolžnosti (159. člen).
(4) The higher court shall grant the appeal and issue an order repealing the judgement issued by the court in the first instance, or repeal the judgement ex officio and return the case for retrial, if it finds that a substantial violation has been committed of the provisions governing misdemeanour proceedings, except for the cases specified in paragraphs 5 and 7 of this article, or if it finds that, due to a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts, the court in the first instance must supplement the proceedings or institute new proceedings and adopt a new decision on the issue. 
(4) Višje sodišče ugodi pritožbi in s sklepom razveljavi sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje ali jo razveljavi po uradni dolžnosti ter zadevo vrne v novo odločitev, če ugotovi, da je podana bistvena kršitev določb postopka o prekršku, razen v primerih iz petega in sedmega odstavka tega člena ali če spozna, da bi moralo zaradi zmotne in nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja sodišče prve stopnje postopek dopolniti ali izvesti nov postopek ter znova odločiti o isti zadevi.
(5) If a substantial violation has been committed of the provisions governing misdemeanour proceedings referred to in points 6 and 8 of paragraph 1 of Article 155 of this Act, the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance may not be repealed, if the repeal for this reason would be to the detriment of the accused person only. 
(5) Če je podana bistvena kršitev določb postopka o prekršku iz 6. in 8. točke prvega odstavka 155. člena tega zakona, se sodba o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje ne sme razveljaviti, če bi bila razveljavitev iz tega razloga samo v škodo obdolženca.
(6) The higher court shall issue an order to repeal the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance even if the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance is not challenged due to a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts, if during the procedure of deciding the appeal a reasonable doubt emerges regarding the truthfulness of the decisive facts established in the misdemeanour judgement, due to which the court believes that a mistake has been made in the finding of facts or the facts have been established incompletely to the detriment of the accused person. 
(6) Višje sodišče s sklepom razveljavi sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje tudi, če sodba o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje ni bila izpodbijana zaradi zmotne in nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja, če nastane pri odločanju o pritožbi precejšen dvom o resničnosti odločilnih dejstev, ki so bila ugotovljena v sodbi o prekršku, zaradi česar misli, da je bilo dejansko stanje zmotno in nepopolno ugotovljeno v obdolženčevo škodo.
The higher court shall also amend the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance if it finds that the considered circumstances must be assessed in a different manner within the framework of the determination of misdemeanour sanctions or deprivation of a pecuniary advantage. 
Višje sodišče s sodbo spremeni sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje tudi, če spozna, da je treba pri odmeri sankcij za prekrške oziroma odvzemu premoženjske koristi drugače presojati upoštevane okoliščine.
(8) The higher court may also amend the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance if it finds that the court in the first instance made a mistake in assessing a document or other evidence which it did not take but on which it based its judgement. 
(8) Višje sodišče lahko spremeni sodbo sodišča prve stopnje tudi takrat, kadar spozna, da je sodišče prve stopnje zmotno presodilo listine ali druge dokaze, ki jih ni samo izvedlo in je nanje oprlo sodbo.
(9) If the only reason for repealing the judgement issued by the court in the first instance is a mistake in the finding of facts, and only a different assessment of the already-established facts is required for a correct judgement, where at the same time no new evidence is required, the higher court shall not repeal the judgement issued by the court in the first instance, but shall act in accordance with paragraph 7 of this article. 
(9) V primeru, ko je edini razlog za razveljavitev sodbe sodišča prve stopnje zmotno ugotovljeno dejansko stanje in je za pravilno ugotovitev potrebna samo drugačna presoja že ugotovljenih dejstev, ne pa tudi izvedba novih dokazov, višje sodišče sodbe sodišča prve stopnje ne razveljavi, ampak ravna po sedmem odstavku tega člena.
(10) If during its consideration of the appeal the higher court finds that the reasons for which it has issued a decision to the benefit of the accused person are also to another accused person&apos;s benefit, it shall act ex officio as if the other accused person has also lodged an appeal. 
(10) Če višje sodišče pri reševanju pritožbe ugotovi, da so razlogi, zaradi katerih je izdalo odločbo v korist obdolženca, v korist tudi kakšnemu drugemu obdolžencu, ki se ni pritožil ali se ni pritožil v tej smeri, ravna po uradni dolžnosti, kakor da bi se bil pritožil tudi ta.
(11) If the appeal has been lodged only to the benefit of the accused person, the misdemeanour judgement may not be amended to the detriment of the accused person. 
(11) Če je pritožba vložena samo v korist obdolženca, se sodba o prekršku ne sme spremeniti v njegovo škodo.
Partial repeal of a judgement 
Delna razveljavitev sodbe
The higher court may repeal a judgement issued by the court in the first instance only partially, if specific parts of the judgement may be excluded without any effects on the correctness of the decision. 
Višje sodišče sme razveljaviti sodbo sodišča prve stopnje samo deloma, če se dajo posamezni deli sodbe izločiti brez škode za pravilno odločitev.
Extended scope of an appeal 
Razširjen obseg pritožbe
An appeal due to a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts, or due to a violation of the substantive provisions of this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour, lodged to the benefit of the accused person, shall also comprise an appeal against the decision on sanctions and deprivation of pecuniary advantage. 
Pritožba zaradi zmotne ali nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja ali zaradi kršitve materialnopravnih določb tega zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek, podana v korist obdolženca, obsega tudi pritožbo zaradi odločitve o sankcijah in o odvzemu premoženjske koristi.
Performance of procedural acts on the basis of a warning 
Oprava procesnih dejanj po opozorilu višjega sodišča
(2) Within the framework of the adoption of a new decision, the court in the first instance shall be bound to the prohibition laid down in paragraph 11 of Article 163 of this Act. 
(2) Pri izreku nove odločbe je sodišče prve stopnje vezano na prepoved, ki je predpisana v enajstem odstavku 163. člena tega zakona.
Decisions by the higher court 
Odločba višjega sodišča
(1) Decisions on appeals issued by the higher court shall be subject, mutatis mutandis, to the application of the provisions of Articles 135, 136 and 138 and paragraph 2 of Article 140 of this Act. 
(1) Za odločbo višjega sodišča o pritožbi se smiselno uporabljajo določbe 135., 136. in 138. člena ter drugi odstavek 140. člena tega zakona.
(2) In the grounds for the decision the higher court shall assess all indications in the appeal and the indications of violations of the substantive provisions of this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour which it observed ex officio. 
(2) V obrazložitvi odločbe oceni višje sodišče navedbe pritožbe in navede kršitve materialnopravnih določb tega zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek, ki jih je upoštevalo po uradni dolžnosti.
(3) If the higher court repeals the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance due to substantial violations of the provisions governing misdemeanour proceedings, the grounds for the decision must include a specification of which provisions have been violated and the nature of an individual violation. 
(3) Če višje sodišče razveljavi sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje zaradi bistvenih kršitev določb postopka o prekrških, je treba v obrazložitvi navesti, katere določbe so bile kršene in v čem je kršitev.
(4) If the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance is repealed due to a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts, the decision must include a specification of the insufficiencies established in the finding of facts. 
(4) Če se sodba o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje razveljavi zaradi zmotne ali nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja, je treba navesti, v čem so pomanjkljivosti pri ugotovitvi dejanskega stanja.
Resolution of other appeals 
Reševanje drugih pritožb
Pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter, appeals against other decisions issued in accordance with this Act within the framework of ordinary court proceedings must also be resolved. 
V skladu z določbami tega poglavja zakona je treba reševati tudi pritožbe zoper druge odločbe, izdane po tem zakonu v rednem sodnem postopku.
EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL 
IZREDNO PRAVNO SREDSTVO
(1) A request for protection of legality may be lodged against any decision issued in the second instance or against any final decision, if this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour has been violated. 
(1) Zahteva za varstvo zakonitosti se lahko vloži zoper vsako odločbo, izdano na drugi stopnji oziroma vsako pravnomočno odločbo, če je prekršen ta zakon ali predpis, ki določa prekršek.
(2) A request for protection of legality may be lodged by a public prosecutor ex officio, or at the initiative of a person who has the right to appeal against a misdemeanour judgement issued by a court in the first instance. 
(2) Zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti lahko vloži državni tožilec po uradni dolžnosti ali na pobudo osebe, ki ima pravico do pritožbe zoper sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje.
Deciding on requests for protection of legality 
Odločanje o zahtevi za varstvo zakonitosti
Requests for protection of legality shall be decided upon by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, i.e. by a senate of three judges, within the framework of a non-public session. 
O zahtevi za varstvo zakonitosti odloča Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije v senatu treh sodnikov na nejavni seji.
Mutatis mutandis applicability of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act governing the procedure applying to protection of legality 
Smiselna uporaba določb zakona o kazenskem postopku za postopek za varstvo zakonitosti
The procedure applying to protection of legality shall be subject, mutatis mutandis, to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act governing the procedure applying to protection of legality. 
Glede postopka za varstvo zakonitosti se smiselno uporabljajo določbe zakona o kazenskem postopku o zahtevi za varstvo zakonitosti.
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUVENILES 
POSTOPEK PROTI MLADOLETNIKOM
Applicability of provisions to proceedings against juveniles 
Uporaba določb v postopku proti mladoletnikom
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to proceedings against persons who committed a misdemeanour as juveniles and who at the time of institution of the proceedings have not fulfilled 19 years of age. 
Določbe tega poglavja se uporabljajo v postopku proti osebam, ki so storile prekršek kot mladoletniki, pa ob začetku postopka o prekršku še niso stare 19 let.
The other provisions of this Act shall also be used if they are not in contravention of the provisions of this Chapter. 
Druge določbe tega zakona se uporabljajo, kolikor niso v nasprotju z določbami tega poglavja.
Authorities in proceedings against juveniles 
Organi v postopku proti mladoletnikom
The authorities participating in proceedings against juveniles and other authorities and institutions from which reports and proposals are requested shall be obliged to take action expeditiously so that the proceedings are completed as soon as possible. 
Organi, ki sodelujejo v postopku proti mladoletniku, ter drugi organi in zavodi, od katerih se zahtevajo poročila in predlogi, so dolžni hitro ukrepati, da bi se postopek čimprej dokončal.
Local jurisdiction 
Krajevna pristojnost
Local jurisdiction over misdemeanour proceedings against juveniles shall be vested in the judge of the court or court department in whose territory the juvenile has permanent or temporary residence. 
Za postopek o prekršku proti mladoletniku je krajevno pristojen sodnik sodišča oziroma oddelka sodišča, na območju katerega mladoletnik stalno ali začasno prebiva.
Unified proceedings 
Enoten postopek
If a person commits one misdemeanour as a juvenile and another one as an adult, unified proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions applying to adults. 
Če je kdo storil en prekršek kot mladoleten, drugega pa kot polnoleten, se opravi enoten postopek po določbah, ki veljajo za polnoletne.
Exclusion of proceedings against juveniles 
Izločitev postopka proti mladoletniku
(1) If a juvenile participates in a misdemeanour together with adult perpetrators, proceedings against him shall be excluded. 
(1) Če je mladoletnik sodeloval pri prekršku skupaj s polnoletnimi storilci, se postopek proti njemu izloči.
(2) Proceedings against a juvenile may be unified with proceedings against adult perpetrators and conducted pursuant to the general provisions of this Act only if this is indispensable for the clarification of issues. 
(2) Postopek proti mladoletniku se sme združiti s postopkom zoper polnoletne storilce in opraviti po splošnih določbah tega zakona samo, če je združitev postopka nujna za vsestransko razjasnitev stvari.
(3) If unified proceedings are conducted against a juvenile and adult perpetrators, the provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the juvenile at all times. 
(3) Če se opravi enoten postopek proti mladoletniku in polnoletnim storilcem, se glede mladoletnika vselej uporabijo določbe tega poglavja.
Notification of the institution of proceedings against juveniles 
Obvestitev o začetku postopka proti mladoletniku
(1) The court shall notify of the institution of proceedings against a juvenile the latter&apos;s parents, adoptive parent, foster parent or guardian of the juvenile, and the authorised social welfare body, except in the case where a fine up to a specific amount is prescribed for the misdemeanour. 
(1) O začetku postopka o prekršku proti mladoletniku obvesti sodišče starše, posvojitelja, rejnika oziroma skrbnika mladoletnika ter pooblaščen organ socialnega varstva, razen v primeru, ko je globa za prekršek predpisana v določenem znesku.
(2) Within the framework of proceedings against juveniles the social welfare body shall have, in addition to the rights explicitly vested in it on the basis of this Chapter, the right to be notified of the developments of the proceedings, to put forward motions during the proceedings, and to draw attention to facts and evidence important for making the correct decision. 
(2) V postopku proti mladoletnikom ima organ socialnega varstva poleg pravic, ki so mu izrecno dane v tem poglavju, tudi pravico seznaniti se s potekom postopka, dajati med postopkom predloge in opozarjati na dejstva in dokaze, ki so pomembni za pravilno odločbo.
Summoning a juvenile 
Vabilo mladoletnika
(1) A juvenile shall be summoned by the court via his parents or legal representative, unless this is not possible because the court must act swiftly or due to other circumstances. 
(1) Mladoletnika vabi sodišče po starših oziroma zakonitem zastopniku, razen če to ni mogoče, ker je treba hitro ravnati, ali zaradi drugih okoliščin.
(2) A juvenile may not be served a summons in such a manner as to affix it on the court&apos;s notice board. 
(2) Mladoletniku se ne smejo vročiti pisanja na ta način, da bi se pritrdila na oglasno desko sodišča.
(3) Orally announced decisions must be submitted to a juvenile in the form of a true copy. 
(3) Ustno naznanjene odločbe se morajo mladoletniku vselej vročiti v overjenem prepisu.
Exclusion of the public 
Izključitev javnosti
(1) When misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile are decided upon in the form of an oral hearing, the public shall be excluded at all times. 
(1) Kadar se odloča v postopku o prekršku proti mladoletniku na ustni obravnavi, se javnost vselej izključi.
(2) The judge of the court conducting misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile may permit that the oral hearing is attended by the persons responsible for caring for and educating the juvenile and scientific workers. 
(2) Sodnik sodišča, ki vodi postopek o prekršku proti mladoletniku, sme dovoliti, da so na ustni obravnavi navzoče osebe, ki se ukvarjajo z varstvom in vzgojo mladoletnika ter znanstveni delavci.
(3) The court conducting misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile may order that the juvenile be removed from the oral hearing in the taking of certain evidence. 
(3) Sodišče, ki vodi postopek o prekršku proti mladoletniku, sme odrediti, naj se mladoletnik med izvedbo posameznih dokazov odstrani z ustne obravnave.
Compulsory examination 
Obvezno zaslišanje
(1) Within the framework of misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile, a misdemeanour judgement or misdemeanour order may not be issued without the juvenile having been examined first. 
(1) V postopku proti mladoletniku se sodba oziroma sklep o prekršku ne moreta izdati brez njegovega zaslišanja.