natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(ii) government revenue that is otherwise due is foregone or not collected (e.g. fiscal incentives such as tax credits) [72]; 
(ii) odpust ali opustitev izterjave dospelih davčnih obveznosti (npr. fiskalne spodbude, kot so davčne olajšave);(1)
(iii) a government provides goods or services other than general infrastructure, or purchases goods; 
(iii) vladna dobava blaga ali storitve, ki sicer ne sodi v splošno infrastrukturo, ali pa odkup blaga;
(iv) a government makes payments to a funding mechanism, or entrusts or directs a private body to carry out one or more of the type of functions illustrated in (i) to (iii) above which would normally be vested in the government and the practice, in no real sense, differs from practices normally followed by governments; or 
(iv) vplačila vlade v določen finančni sklad ali pooblastilo ali navodilo zasebnemu subjektu, da opravi več opravil take vrste, kot so našteta v točkah od (i) do (iii) tega pododstavka, ki bi jih v običajnih okoliščinah opravila vlada in se opravljanje take dejavnosti dejansko in po vsebini ne razlikuje od dejavnosti, ki jo sicer opravlja vlada, ali
(a)(2) there is any form of income or price support in the sense of Article XVI of GATT 1994; 
(a) (2) kakršnakoli oblika dohodkovne ali cenovne podpore v smislu XVI. člena GATT 1994;
(b) a benefit is thereby conferred. 
(b) pri tem nastane korist.
1.2 A subsidy as defined in paragraph 1 shall be subject to the provisions of Part II or shall be subject to the provisions of Part III or V only if such a subsidy is specific in accordance with the provisions of Article 2. 
1.2 Subvencija, kakor je opisana v prvem odstavku, je predmet določb II. ali III. ali V. dela le, če je specifična v smislu določb 2. člena.
2.1 In order to determine whether a subsidy, as defined in paragraph 1 of Article 1, is specific to an enterprise or industry or group of enterprises or industries (referred to in this Agreement as &quot;certain enterprises&quot;) within the jurisdiction of the granting authority, the following principles shall apply: 
2.1 Da lahko subvencija, kakor je opredeljena v prvem odstavku 1. člena, velja kot specifična glede na določeno podjetje ali industrijo ali skupino podjetij ali industrij (v nadaljnjem besedilu določena podjetja), ki so v pristojnosti določene oblasti, ki subvencijo daje, se uporabijo ta načela:
(a) Where the granting authority, or the legislation pursuant to which the granting authority operates, explicitly limits access to a subsidy to certain enterprises, such subsidy shall be specific. 
(a) subvencija je specifična, če oblasti ali zakonodaja, ki oblastem omogoča subvencioniranje, izrecno omejuje dostop do subvencije določenim podjetjem;
(b) Where the granting authority, or the legislation pursuant to which the granting authority operates, establishes objective criteria or conditions[73] governing the eligibility for, and the amount of, a subsidy, specificity shall not exist, provided that the eligibility is automatic and that such criteria and conditions are strictly adhered to. 
(b) če oblasti, ki dajejo subvencijo, ter ustrezna zakonodaja, ki omogoča uporabo subvencije, uporabljajo objektivna merila ali pogoje(2) za pridobitev ali določitev višine subvencije, tedaj subvencija ni specifična, če je pravica pridobiti subvencijo avtomatična in če se strogo ravnajo po teh merilih in pogojih.
The criteria or conditions must be clearly spelled out in law, regulation, or other official document, so as to be capable of verification. 
Merila in pogoji morajo biti jasno navedeni v zakonu, predpisu ali drugem uradnem dokumentu, tako da jih je možno preverjati;
(c) If, notwithstanding any appearance of non specificity resulting from the application of the principles laid down in subparagraphs (a) and (b), there are reasons to believe that the subsidy may in fact be specific, other factors may be considered. 
(c) četudi bi kazalo, da subvencija ni specifična na podlagi načel v pododstavku (a) in (b), vendar pa obstajajo razlogi za to, da je subvencija dejansko specifična, tedaj je treba upoštevati tudi druge dejavnike.
use of a subsidy programme by a limited number of certain enterprises, predominant use by certain enterprises, the granting of disproportionately large amounts of subsidy to certain enterprises, and the manner in which discretion has been exercised by the granting authority in the decision to grant a subsidy.[74] In applying this subparagraph, account shall be taken of the extent of diversification of economic activities within the jurisdiction of the granting authority, as well as of the length of time during which the subsidy programme has been in operation. 
uporaba programa subvencioniranja v korist omejenega števila določenih podjetij, pretežna uporaba subvencij s strani določenih podjetij, dodelitev nesorazmerno velikih vrednosti subvencij določenim podjetjem ter način presojanja oblasti pri odločanju o dodelitvi subvencije.(3) Pri uporabi tega pododstavka se upošteva tudi raznolikost gospodarskih dejavnosti v pristojnosti določene oblasti kakor tudi dolžina časa uporabe določenega programa subvencioniranja.
2.2 A subsidy which is limited to certain enterprises located within a designated geographical region within the jurisdiction of the granting authority shall be specific. 
2.2 Subvencija, ki je omejena na določeno podjetje na določenem zemljepisnem območju, ki je v pristojnosti oblasti, ki subvencijo daje, velja kot specifična subvencija.
It is understood that the setting or change of generally applicable tax rates by all levels of government entitled to do so shall not be deemed to be a specific subsidy for the purposes of this Agreement. 
Za namene tega sporazuma velja, da določanje višin ali spreminjanje splošno veljavnih davčnih stopenj na vseh ravneh oblasti, ki imajo te pristojnosti, ne pomeni uporabe specifične subvencije.
2.3 Any subsidy falling under the provisions of Article 3 shall be deemed to be specific. 
2.3 Kakršnakoli subvencija, ki ustreza določbam 3. člena, se šteje za specifično.
2.4 Any determination of specificity under the provisions of this Article shall be clearly substantiated on the basis of positive evidence. 
2.4 Kakršnokoli ugotavljanje specifičnosti v skladu z določbami tega člena je treba jasno utemeljiti s pozitivnimi dokazi.
3.1 Except as provided in the Agreement on Agriculture, the following subsidies, within the meaning of Article 1, shall be prohibited: 
3.1 Z izjemo določb Sporazuma o kmetijstvu so po 1. členu prepovedane te subvencije:
(a) subsidies contingent, in law or in fact[75], whether solely or as one of several other conditions, upon export performance, including those illustrated in Annex I[76]; 
(a) subvencije, ki so dejansko(4) ali zakonito odvisne od izvoznih rezultatov kot edinega ali enega od več pogojev, vključno s tistimi, ki jih ponazarja Priloga I;(5)
(b) subsidies contingent, whether solely or as one of several other conditions, upon the use of domestic over imported goods. 
(b) subvencije, ki so odvisne od prednostne uporabe domačega proizvoda namesto uvoženega proizvoda, bodisi da je to edini ali eden izmed več drugih pogojev.
3.2 A Member shall neither grant nor maintain subsidies referred to in paragraph 1. 
3.2 Članica ne daje niti ne ohranja subvencij, ki jih določa prvi odstavek.
4.1 Whenever a Member has reason to believe that a prohibited subsidy is being granted or maintained by another Member, such Member may request consultations with such other Member. 
4.1 Kadar članica iz določenih razlogov meni, da druga članica daje ali ohranja prepovedano subvencijo, sme taka članica zahtevati posvetovanje s to drugo članico.
4.2 A request for consultations under paragraph 1 shall include a statement of available evidence with regard to the existence and nature of the subsidy in question. 
4.2 Zahteva za posvetovanje na podlagi prvega odstavka vsebuje izjavo o razpoložljivih dokazih v zvezi z obstojem in naravo sporne subvencije.
4.3 Upon request for consultations under paragraph 1, the Member believed to be granting or maintaining the subsidy in question shall enter into such consultations as quickly as possible. 
4.3 Na podlagi zahteve za posvetovanje v smislu prvega odstavka se mora članica, za katero se domneva, da daje ali ohranja sporno subvencijo, odzvati tej zahtevi v čim krajšem možnem času.
The purpose of the consultations shall be to clarify the facts of the situation and to arrive at a mutually agreed solution. 
Namen posvetovanj je pojasnitev dejstev in oblikovanje vzajemno sprejemljive rešitve.
4.4 If no mutually agreed solution has been reached within 30 days[77] of the request for consultations, any Member party to such consultations may refer the matter to the Dispute Settlement Body (&quot;DSB&quot;) for the immediate establishment of a panel, unless the DSB decides by consensus not to establish a panel. 
4.4 Če soglasna rešitev ni dosežena v 30 dneh(6) od tedaj, ko je dana zahteva za posvetovanje, lahko vsaka članica, ki je udeležena na posvetovanjih, zadevo pošlje Odboru za reševanje sporov (Dispute Settlement Body, v nadaljnjem besedilu DSB) zaradi takojšnje ustanovitve ugotovitvenega sveta, razen če DSB soglasno odloči, da ne ustanovi takega sveta.
4.5 Upon its establishment, the panel may request the assistance of the Permanent Group of Experts[78] (referred to in this Agreement as the &quot;PGE&quot;) with regard to whether the measure in question is a prohibited subsidy. 
4.5 Ob njegovi ustanovitvi sme ugotovitveni svet zahtevati pomoč Stalne skupine izvedencev (Permanent Group of Experts, v nadaljnjem besedilu PGE)(7) pri ugotavljanju, ali je določen sporen ukrep po naravi prepovedana subvencija.
If so requested, the PGE shall immediately review the evidence with regard to the existence and nature of the measure in question and shall provide an opportunity for the Member applying or maintaining the measure to demonstrate that the measure in question is not a prohibited subsidy. 
Če se tako zahteva, PGE takoj pregleda dokaze v zvezi z obstojem in naravo spornega ukrepa ter da članici, ki tak ukrep uporablja ali ohranja, možnost, da prikaže, da sporen ukrep ni prepovedana subvencija.
The PGE shall report its conclusions to the panel within a time limit determined by the panel. 
PGE sporoči svoje ugotovitve ugotovitvenemu svetu v roku, ki ga ta določi.
The PGE&apos;s conclusions on the issue of whether or not the measure in question is a prohibited subsidy shall be accepted by the panel without modification. 
Ugotovitve PGE o vprašanju, ali je oziroma ni sporen ukrep prepovedana subvencija, ugotovitveni svet sprejme brez sprememb.
4.6 The panel shall submit its final report to the parties to the dispute. 
4.6 Ugotovitveni svet dostavi svoje končno poročilo strankam v sporu.
The report shall be circulated to all Members within 90 days of the date of the composition and the establishment of the panel&apos;s terms of reference. 
Poročilo se pošlje vsem članicam v 90 dneh od dneva sestave in določitve mandata ugotovitvenega sveta.
4.7 If the measure in question is found to be a prohibited subsidy, the panel shall recommend that the subsidizing Member withdraw the subsidy without delay. 
4.7 Če se ugotovi, da je sporen ukrep prepovedana subvencija, ugotovitveni svet priporoči članici, da subvencijo nemudoma umakne.
In this regard, the panel shall specify in its recommendation the time period within which the measure must be withdrawn. 
V zvezi s tem svet v svojem priporočilu določi čas, v katerem je treba umakniti subvencijo.
4.8 Within 30 days of the issuance of the panel&apos;s report to all Members, the report shall be adopted by the DSB unless one of the parties to the dispute formally notifies the DSB of its decision to appeal or the DSB decides by consensus not to adopt the report. 
4.8 V 30 dneh od takrat, ko je ugotovitveni svet poslal svoje poročilo vsem članicam, poročilo sprejme DSB, razen če ena od strank v sporu formalno sporoči DSB, da je sprejela odločitev vložiti pritožbo, ali če DSB soglasno sprejme odločitev, da poročila ne sprejme.
7.7 Where a panel report is appealed, the Appellate Body shall issue its decision within 60 days from the date when the party to the dispute formally notifies its intention to appeal. 
7.7 Če se zoper poročilo ugotovitvenega sveta vloži pritožba, Pritožbeni organ sprejme odločitev v 60 dneh od dneva, ko je stranka v sporu formalno sporočila svoj namen, da vloži pritožbo.
When the Appellate Body considers that it cannot provide its report within 60 days, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report. 
Kadar Pritožbeni organ meni, da svojega poročila ne more zagotoviti v 60 dneh, mora DSB pisno obvestiti o razlogih za zamudo skupaj s presojo, v kakšnem obdobju bo dal svoje poročilo.
In no case shall the proceedings exceed 90 days. 
V nobenem primeru postopki ne smejo preseči 90 dni.
The appellate report shall be adopted by the DSB and unconditionally accepted by the parties to the dispute unless the DSB decides by consensus not to adopt the appellate report within 20 days following its issuance to the Members.[79] 
Poročilo o pritožbi sprejme DSB in brezpogojno tudi stranke v sporu, razen če DSB v 20 dneh, potem ko je poročilo poslano članicam, soglasno sprejme odločitev, da poročila o pritožbi ne sprejme.(8)
4.10 In the event the recommendation of the DSB is not followed within the time period specified by the panel, which shall commence from the date of adoption of the panel&apos;s report or the Appellate Body&apos;s report, the DSB shall grant authorization to the complaining Member to take appropriate[80] countermeasures, unless the DSB decides by consensus to reject the request. 
4.10 Če se priporočilo DSB ne upošteva v roku, ki ga je določil ugotovitveni svet, ki pa prične teči od tistega dneva, ko je ugotovitveni svet poročilo sprejel ali od datuma poročila Pritožbenega organa, DSB pooblasti članico, ki se je pritožila, da sprejme ustrezne(9) protiukrepe, razen če DSB soglasno sprejme odločitev, da se taka zahteva zavrne.
4.11 In the event a party to the dispute requests arbitration under paragraph 6 of Article 22 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (&quot;DSU&quot;), the arbitrator shall determine whether the countermeasures are appropriate.[81] 
4.11 Če ena od strank v sporu zahteva arbitražo v skladu s šestim odstavkom 22. člena Dogovora o reševanju sporov (Dispute Settlement Understanding, v nadaljnjem besedilu DSU), mora razsodnik ugotoviti, ali so protiukrepi ustrezni.(10)
4.12 For purposes of disputes conducted pursuant to this Article, except for time periods specifically prescribed in this Article, time periods applicable under the DSU for the conduct of such disputes shall be half the time prescribed therein. 
4.12 Za namene reševanja sporov v skladu s tem členom z izjemo tistih rokov, ki so predvideni v tem členu, veljajo za reševanje teh sporov roki, ki jih določa DSU in so polovico krajši od tistih, ki jih določa ta akt.
ACTIONABLE SUBSIDIES 
IZPODBOJNE SUBVENCIJE
Adverse Effects 
Škodljivi učinki
No Member should cause, through the use of any subsidy referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 1, adverse effects to the interests of other Members, i.e.: 
Nobena članica ne sme z uporabo kakršnihkoli subvencij, na katere se sklicujeta prvi in drugi odstavek 1. člena, povzročati učinkov, ki škodijo interesom drugih članic, t.j.:
(a) injury to the domestic industry of another Member[82]; 
(a) škodo domači industriji druge članice;(11)
(b) nullification or impairment of benefits accruing directly or indirectly to other Members under GATT 1994 in particular the benefits of concessions bound under Article II of GATT 1994[83]; 
(b) izničenje ali omejevanje neposredno ali posredno pridobljenih koristi drugih članic v smislu GATT 1994, zlasti koristi, ki temeljijo na koncesijah, ki so vezane na podlagi II. člena GATT 1994;(12)
(c) serious prejudice to the interests of another Member.[84] 
(c) resno ogrožanje interesov druge članice.(13)
This Article does not apply to subsidies maintained on agricultural products as provided in Article 13 of the Agreement on Agriculture. 
Ta člen se ne uporablja za subvencije za kmetijske proizvode v smislu 13. člena Sporazuma o kmetijstvu.
Serious Prejudice 
Resno ogrožanje
6.1 Serious prejudice in the sense of paragraph (c) of Article 5 shall be deemed to exist in the case of: 
6.1 Šteje se, da resno ogrožanje v smislu (c) odstavka 5. člena obstaja v teh primerih:
(a) the total ad valorem subsidization[85] of a product exceeding 5 per cent[86]; 
(a) če celotna vrednost subvencioniranja(14) za določen proizvod znaša več kot 5 odstotkov;(15)
(b) subsidies to cover operating losses sustained by an industry; 
(b) subvencije za pokrivanje obratovalnih izgub, ki jih je imela določena industrija;
(c) subsidies to cover operating losses sustained by an enterprise, other than one time measures which are non recurrent and cannot be repeated for that enterprise and which are given merely to provide time for the development of long term solutions and to avoid acute social problems; 
(c) subvencije za pokrivanje obratovalnih izgub, ki jih je imelo določeno podjetje, z izjemo enkratnih ukrepov, ki se ne ponavljajo in se ne morejo ponoviti v korist tistega podjetja ter se uporabljajo le kot časovna premostitev za razvoj dolgoročnejših rešitev in da bi se izognili resnim socialnim težavam;
(d) direct forgiveness of debt, i.e. forgiveness of government held debt, and grants to cover debt repayment.[87] 
(d) neposredna oprostitev dolga, t.j. odpust dolga, ki je terjatev vlade, in dotacije, namenjene odplačilu dolgov.(16)
6.2 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, serious prejudice shall not be found if the subsidizing Member demonstrates that the subsidy in question has not resulted in any of the effects enumerated in paragraph 3. 
6.2 Ne glede na določbe prvega odstavka resno ogrožanje ne obstaja, če članica, ki subvencijo uporablja, prikaže, da sporna subvencija nima nobenega izmed učinkov, naštetih v tretjem odstavku.
6.3 Serious prejudice in the sense of paragraph (c) of Article 5 may arise in any case where one or several of the following apply: 
6.3 Resno ogrožanje v smislu odstavka (c) 5. člena utegne nastati v vsakem primeru, če obstaja ena ali več od teh možnosti:
(a) the effect of the subsidy is to displace or impede the imports of a like product of another Member into the market of the subsidizing Member; 
(a) učinek subvencije je v nadomeščanju ali oviranju uvoza enakega proizvoda druge članice na trg članice, ki subvencijo uporablja;
(b) the effect of the subsidy is to displace or impede the exports of a like product of another Member from a third country market; 
(b) učinek subvencije je v nadomeščanju ali oviranju uvoza enakega proizvoda druge članice, ki se uvaža iz trga tretje države;
(c) the effect of the subsidy is a significant price undercutting by the subsidized product as compared with the price of a like product of another Member in the same market or significant price suppression, price depression or lost sales in the same market; 
(c) učinek subvencije je znatno izpodbijanje cen pod vplivom proizvoda, ki se subvencionira, v primerjavi s ceno enakega proizvoda druge članice na istem trgu ali znatno omejevanje cen, cenovno nižanje ali izguba prodaje na istem trgu;
(d) the effect of the subsidy is an increase in the world market share of the subsidizing Member in a particular subsidized primary product or commodity[88] as compared to the average share it had during the previous period of three years and this increase follows a consistent trend over a period when subsidies have been granted. 
(d) učinek subvencije je rast tržnega deleža na svetovnem trgu članice, ki subvencije uporablja, zlasti v zvezi z določenim subvencioniranim osnovnim proizvodom ali surovino,(17) v primerjavi s povprečnim deležem, ki ga je imela v obdobju zadnjih treh let ter se ta rast nadaljuje v neprekinjeni razvojni smeri v obdobju, v katerem so bile dane subvencije.
6.4 For the purpose of paragraph 3(b), the displacement or impeding of exports shall include any case in which, subject to the provisions of paragraph 7, it has been demonstrated that there has been a change in relative shares of the market to the disadvantage of the non subsidized like product (over an appropriately representative period sufficient to demonstrate clear trends in the development of the market for the product concerned, which, in normal circumstances, shall be at least one year). 
6.4 Za namene tretjega (b) odstavka nadomestitev ali oviranje izvoza pomeni vsak primer, za katerega se pod pogoji sedmega odstavka ugotovi, da je prišlo do relativne spremembe v tržnih deležih na škodo enakega nesubvencioniranega proizvoda (v ustreznem reprezentativnem časovnem obdobju, ki zadostuje, da se prikaže jasen razvojni trend na trgu za določen proizvod, ki je v normalnih okoliščinah vsaj eno leto).
&quot;Change in relative shares of the market&quot; shall include any of the following situations: 
“Relativna sprememba v tržnem deležu” vključuje katerokoli od teh situacij:
(a) there is an increase in the market share of the subsidized product; (b) the market share of the subsidized product remains constant in circumstances in which, in the absence of the subsidy, it would have declined; (c) the market share of the subsidized product declines, but at a slower rate than would have been the case in the absence of the subsidy. 
(a) tržni delež subvencioniranega proizvoda se poveča; (b) tržni delež subvencioniranega proizvoda ostane enak v razmerah, ko bi se ta delež brez subvencije zmanjšal; (c) tržni delež za subvencionirani proizvod se zmanjša, vendar počasneje, kot bi se sicer zmanjševal, če subvencije ne bi bilo.
6.5 For the purpose of paragraph 3(c), price undercutting shall include any case in which such price undercutting has been demonstrated through a comparison of prices of the subsidized product with prices of a non subsidized like product supplied to the same market. 
6.5 Za namene tretjega (c) odstavka izpodbijanje cen pomeni vsak primer, v katerem se tako izpodbijanje prikaže v primerjavi cen subvencioniranega proizvoda in nesubvencioniranega enakega proizvoda, ki se dobavlja na isti trg.
The comparison shall be made at the same level of trade and at comparable times, due account being taken of any other factor affecting price comparability. 
Primerjavo je treba opraviti na isti ravni trgovine ter v primerljivih časovnih obdobjih ob upoštevanju katerihkoli drugih dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cen.
However, if such a direct comparison is not possible, the existence of price undercutting may be demonstrated on the basis of export unit values. 
Toda če tako neposredno primerjanje ni izvedljivo, je možno prikazati obstoj izpodbijanja cen na podlagi primerjav vrednosti določenih izvoznih enot.
6.6 Each Member in the market of which serious prejudice is alleged to have arisen shall, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3 of Annex V, make available to the parties to a dispute arising under Article 7, and to the panel established pursuant to paragraph 4 of Article 7, all relevant information that can be obtained as to the changes in market shares of the parties to the dispute as well as concerning prices of the products involved. 
6.6 Vsaka članica, ki meni, da na njenem trgu obstaja resno ogrožanje, mora v skladu z določbami tretjega odstavka Priloge V dati na razpolago strankam v sporu, ki izhaja iz 7. člena, ter ugotovitvenemu svetu, ki se ustanovi v skladu s četrtim odstavkom 7. člena, vse ustrezne informacije, ki jih lahko dobi v zvezi s spremembami tržnih deležev strank v sporu, vključno s cenami proizvodov, ki so predmet spora.
6.7 Displacement or impediment resulting in serious prejudice shall not arise under paragraph 3 where any of the following circumstances exist[89] during the relevant period: 
6.7 Nadomestitev ali oviranje, ki ima za posledico resno ogrožanje, ne obstaja v smislu tretjega odstavka, če v določenem obdobju obstaja katerakoli od teh okoliščin:(18)