natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require; 
c) da se brani sam ali z zagovornikom po lastni izbiri ali če nima dovolj sredstev za plačilo zagovornika, da ga dobi brezplačno, če to zahtevajo interesi pravičnosti;
(d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; 
d) da zaslišuje oziroma zahteva zaslišanje obremenilnih prič in da doseže navzočnost in zaslišanje razbremenilnih prič ob enakih pogojih, kot veljajo za obremenilne priče;
(e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.&quot; 
e) da ima brezplačno pomoč tolmača, če ne razume ali ne govori jezika, ki se uporablja pred sodiščem.«
In accordance with Article 52(3), this right has the same meaning and scope as the right guaranteed by the ECHR. 
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine ima ta pravica enak pomen in področje uporabe kot pravica, zagotovljena z EKČP.
This Article follows the traditional rule of the non-retroactivity of laws and criminal sanctions. 
Ta člen upošteva običajno pravilo o prepovedi retroaktivnosti zakonov in kazni.
There has been added the rule of the retroactivity of a more lenient penal law, which exists in a number of Member States and which features in Article 15 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 
Dodano je bilo pravilo retroaktivnosti milejše kazenskega zakona, ki obstaja v številnih državah članicah in je podano v členu 15 Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah.
No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. 
1) Nihče ne sme biti obsojen za katerokoli dejanje, izvršeno s storitvijo ali opustitvijo, ki ni bilo določeno kot kaznivo dejanje po domačem ali po mednarodnem pravu v času, ko je bilo storjeno.
This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations.&quot; 
Ta člen ni ovira za sojenje in kaznovanje oseb za kako storitev ali opustitev, ki je bila v času, ko je bila storjena, kazniva po splošnih pravnih načelih, ki jih priznavajo civilizirani narodi.«
In paragraph 2, the reference to &quot;civilised&quot; nations has been deleted; this does not change the meaning of this paragraph, which refers to crimes against humanity in particular. 
V drugem odstavku se je črtala beseda »civilizirani«; to ne spreminja pomena tega odstavka, ki se nanaša predvsem na zločine zoper človeštvo.
In accordance with Article 52(3), the right guaranteed here therefore has the same meaning and scope as the right guaranteed by the ECHR. 
V skladu z tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine ima tukaj zagotovljena pravica torej enak pomen in področje uporabe kot pravica, zagotovljena z EKČP.
Paragraph 3 states the general principle of proportionality between penalties and criminal offences which is enshrined in the common constitutional traditions of the Member States and in the case law of the Court of Justice of the Communities. 
Tretji odstavek podaja splošno načelo sorazmernosti kazni in kaznivih dejanj, ki je utemeljeno z ustavnimi tradicijami, skupnimi vsem državam članicam, in s sodno prakso Sodišča Skupnosti.
No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings under the jurisdiction of the same State for an offence for which he has already been finally acquitted or convicted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of that State. 
1) Pravosodni organi iste države ne smejo nikogar ne kazensko preganjati ne kaznovati za kaznivo dejanje, za katero je bil na podlagi zakona in v skladu s kazenskim postopkom te države s pravnomočno sodbo že oproščen ali obsojen.
The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall not prevent the reopening of the case in accordance with the law and the penal procedure of the State concerned, if there is evidence of new or newly discovered facts, or if there has been a fundamental defect in the previous proceedings, which could affect the outcome of the case. 
Določbe prejšnjega odstavka ne preprečujejo obnove kazenskega postopka na podlagi zakona in skladno s kazenskim postopkom prizadete države, če obstajajo dokazi o novih ali na novo odkritih dejstvih ali pa če je v prejšnjih postopkih prišlo do bistvene napake, ki bi lahko vplivala na izid sojenja.
No derogation from this Article shall be made under Article 15 of the Convention.&quot; 
Določila tega člena se ne smejo derogirati s sklicevanjem na 15. člen Konvencije.«
The &quot;non bis in idem&quot; rule applies in Union law (see, among the many precedents, the judgment of 5 May 1966, Cases 18/65 and 35/65, Gutmann v. Commission [1966] ECR 103 and a recent case, the decision of the Court of First Instance of 20 April 1999, Joined Cases T-305/94 and others, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV v. Commission [1999] ECR II-931). 
Pravilo »non bis in idem« se uporablja v pravu Unije (glej med obsežno sodno prakso sodbo z dne 5. maja 1966, zadevi 18/65 in 35/65, Gutmann proti Komisiji [1966] PSES 103 in za novejšo zadevo sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 20. aprila 1999, združene zadeve T-305/94 in druge, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV proti Komisiji [1999] PSES II-931).
The rule prohibiting cumulation refers to cumulation of two penalties of the same kind, that is to say criminal law penalties. 
Pravilo o prepovedi kumulacije se nanaša na kumulacijo dveh kazni enake vrste, v tem primeru kazni, izrečene na kazenskem sodišču.
In accordance with Article 50, the &quot;non bis in idem&quot; rule applies not only within the jurisdiction of one State but also between the jurisdictions of several Member States. 
V skladu s členom 50 se pravilo »non bis in idem« ne uporablja zgolj v okviru pristojnosti ene države, temveč tudi v okviru pristojnosti več držav članic.
That corresponds to the acquis in Union law; see Articles 54 to 58 of the Schengen Convention and the judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 February 2003, C-187/01 Gözütok (not yet published), Article 7 of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities&apos; Financial Interests and Article 10 of the Convention on the fight against corruption. 
To ustreza pravnemu redu v pravu Unije; glej člene 54 do 58 Schengenske konvencije in sodbo Sodišča z dne 11. februarja 2003, C-187/01 Gözütok, člen 7 Konvencije o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in člen 10 Konvencije o boju proti korupciji.
The very limited exceptions in those Conventions permitting the Member States to derogate from the &quot;non bis in idem&quot; rule are covered by the horizontal clause in Article 52(1) of the Charter concerning limitations. 
Zelo omejene izjeme v navedenih konvencijah, ki državam članicam omogočajo izjemo od pravila »non bis in idem«, so določene s horizontalno klavzulo iz prvega odstavka člena 52 Listine glede omejitev.
As regards the situations referred to by Article 4 of Protocol No 7, namely the application of the principle within the same Member State, the guaranteed right has the same meaning and the same scope as the corresponding right in the ECHR. 
Kar zadeva razmere iz 4. člena Protokola št. 7 EKČP, tj. uporabo načela v isti državi članici, ima zagotovljena pravica enak pomen in področje uporabe kot ustrezna pravica v EKČP.
The aim of Article 51 is to determine the scope of the Charter. 
Namen člena 51 Listine je opredeliti področje uporabe Listine.
It seeks to establish clearly that the Charter applies primarily to the institutions and bodies of the Union, in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity. 
Prizadeva si jasno določiti, da se Listina ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti uporablja zlasti za institucije in organe Unije.
This provision was drafted in keeping with Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, which required the Union to respect fundamental rights, and with the mandate issued by Cologne European Council. 
Ta določba je bila sestavljena v skladu s členom 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki od Unije zahteva, da upošteva temeljne pravice, in v skladu z mandatom, podeljenim v okviru Evropskega sveta v Kölnu.
The term &quot;institutions&quot; is enshrined in Part I of the Constitution. 
Izraz »institucije« je utemeljen v I. delu Ustave.
The expression &quot;bodies, offices and agencies&quot; is commonly used in the Constitution to refer to all the authorities set up by the Constitution or by secondary legislation (see, e.g., Articles I-50 or I-51 of the Constitution). 
V Ustavi se izraz »organi, uradi in agencije« navadno uporablja za označevanje vseh teles, ustanovljenih z Ustavo ali sekundarno zakonodajo (glej npr. I-50. ali I-51. člen Ustave).
As regards the Member States, it follows unambiguously from the case law of the Court of Justice that the requirement to respect fundamental rights defined in a Union context is only binding on the Member States when they act in the scope of Union law (judgment of 13 July 1989, Case 5/88 Wachauf [1989] ECR 2609; judgment of 18 June 1991, ERT [1991] ECR I-2925); judgment of 18 December 1997 (C-309/96 Annibaldi [1997] ECR I-7493). 
V zvezi z državami članicami sodna praksa Sodišča nedvoumno določa, da je zahteva po spoštovanju temeljnih pravic, opredeljenih v okviru Unije, zavezujoča za države članice le tedaj, ko ukrepajo znotraj področja uporabe prava Unije (sodba z dne 13. julija 1989, zadeva 5/88 Wachauf [1989] PSES 2609; sodba z dne 18. junija 1991, ERT [1991] PSES I-2925); sodba z dne 18. decembra 1997 (C-309/96 Annibaldi [1997] PSES I-7493).
The Court of Justice confirmed this case law in the following terms: 
Sodišče je potrdilo to sodno prakso pod naslednjimi pogoji:
&quot;In addition, it should be remembered that the requirements flowing from the protection of fundamental rights in the Community legal order are also binding on Member States when they implement Community rules...&quot; 
»Treba je tudi upoštevati, da so zahteve, ki izhajajo iz varstva temeljnih pravic v pravnem redu Skupnosti, zavezujoče tudi za države članice pri njihovem izvajanju pravil Skupnosti...«
(judgment of 13 April 2000, Case C-292/97, [2000] ECR 2737, paragraph 37 of the grounds). 
(sodba z dne 13. aprila 2000, zadeva C-292/97, [2000] PSES 2737, odstavek 37 obrazložitve).
Of course this rule, as enshrined in this Charter, applies to the central authorities as well as to regional or local bodies, and to public organisations, when they are implementing Union law. 
Seveda se to pravilo, utemeljeno v tej listini, uporablja za centralne organe in regionalne ali lokalne organe ter za javne organizacije pri njihovem izvajanju prava Unije.
Paragraph 2, together with the second sentence of paragraph 1, confirms that the Charter may not have the effect of extending the competences and tasks which the other Parts of the Constitution confer on the Union. 
Drugi odstavek skupaj z drugim stavkom prvega odstavka potrjuje, da Listina ne more povzročiti širitve pristojnosti in nalog, ki so z drugimi deli Ustave dodeljene Uniji.
Explicit mention is made here of the logical consequences of the principle of subsidiarity and of the fact that the Union only has those powers which have been conferred upon it. 
Gre za to, da se izrecno navedejo logične posledice, nastale zaradi načela subsidiarnosti in zaradi dejstva, da ima Unija samo tiste pristojnosti, ki so ji bile dodeljene.
The fundamental rights as guaranteed in the Union do not have any effect other than in the context of the powers determined by Parts I and III of the Constitution. 
Temeljne pravice, zagotovljene v Uniji, nimajo nikakršnih posledic, razen v okviru pristojnosti, določenih v I. in III. delu Ustave.
Consequently, an obligation, pursuant to the second sentence of paragraph 1, for the Union&apos;s institutions to promote principles laid down in the Charter, may arise only within the limits of these same powers. 
Zato obveznost institucij Unije, da v skladu z drugim stavkom prvega odstavka spodbujajo načela, podana v Listini, lahko obstaja le v mejah teh pristojnosti.
Paragraph 2 also confirms that the Charter may not have the effect of extending the field of application of Union law beyond the powers of the Union as established in the other Parts of the Constitution. 
Drugi odstavek tudi potrjuje, da Listina ne more povzročiti širitve področja uporabe prava Unije preko njenih pristojnosti, določenih v drugih delih Ustave.
The Court of Justice has already established this rule with respect to the fundamental rights recognised as part of Union law (judgment of 17 February 1998, C-249/96 Grant, 1998 ECR I-621, paragraph 45 of the grounds). 
Sodišče je že opredelilo to pravilo v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami, ki štejejo kot del prava Unije (sodba z dne 17. februarja 1998, C-249/96 Grant, 1998 PSES I-621, odstavek 45 obrazložitve).
In accordance with this rule, it goes without saying that the incorporation of the Charter into the Constitution cannot be understood as extending by itself the range of Member State action considered to be &quot;implementation of Union law&quot; (within the meaning of paragraph 1 and the above-mentioned case law). 
V skladu s tem pravilom je samoumevno, da vključitev Listine v Ustavo ne more sama po sebi pomeniti širitve obsega ukrepov držav članic, ki štejejo kot »izvajanje prava Unije« (v smislu prvega odstavka in zgoraj navedene sodne prakse).
The purpose of Article 52 is to set the scope of the rights and principles of the Charter, and to lay down rules for their interpretation. 
Namen člena 52 je opredeliti obseg pravic in načel Listine ter določiti pravila za njihovo razlago.
Paragraph 1 deals with the arrangements for the limitation of rights. 
Prvi odstavek obravnava podrobnosti glede omejevanja pravic.
The wording is based on the case law of the Court of Justice: 
Besedilo temelji na sodni praksi Sodišča:
it is well established in the case law of the Court that restrictions may be imposed on the exercise of fundamental rights, in particular in the context of a common organisation of the market, provided that those restrictions in fact correspond to objectives of general interest pursued by the Community and do not constitute, with regard to the aim pursued, disproportionate and unreasonable interference undermining the very substance of those rights&quot; (judgment of 13 April 2000, Case C-292/97, paragraph 45 of the grounds). 
»...skladno z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča je mogoče uvesti omejitve pri uresničevanju temeljnih pravic, zlasti v okviru skupne ureditve trga, pod pogojem, da navedene omejitve dejansko ustrezajo ciljem splošnega interesa, za katere se zavzema Skupnost, in da ne povzročajo glede na želeni cilj čezmernega in neutemeljenega motenja, ki bi ogrožalo samo bistvo navedenih pravic« (sodba z dne 13. aprila 2000, zadeva C-292/97, odstavek 45 obrazložitve).
The reference to general interests recognised by the Union covers both the objectives mentioned in Article I-2 of the Constitution and other interests protected by specific provisions of the Constitution such as Articles I-5(1), III-133(3), III-154 and III-436. 
Sklicevanje na splošne interese, ki jih priznava Unija, zajema cilje iz I-2 člena in druge interese, ki so zaščiteni s posebnimi določbami Ustave, na primer prvim odstavkom I-5. člena, tretjim odstavkom III-133. člena in III-154. ter III-436. členom.
Paragraph 2 refers to rights which were already expressly guaranteed in the Treaty establishing the European Community and have been recognised in the Charter, and which are now found in other Parts of the Constitution (notably the rights derived from Union citizenship). 
Drugi odstavek se nanaša na pravice, ki jih že izrecno zagotavlja Pogodba o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in priznava Listina in se sedaj nahajajo v drugih delih Ustave (predvsem pravice, ki izhajajo iz državljanstva Unije).
It clarifies that such rights remain subject to the conditions and limits applicable to the Union law on which they are based, and for which provision is now made in Parts I and III of the Constitution. 
Pojasnjuje, da za takšne pravice še nadalje veljajo pogoji in omejitve, ki se uporabljajo za pravo Unije, na katerem te pravice temeljijo, in ki so sedaj predvideni v I. in III. delu Ustave.
The Charter does not alter the system of rights conferred by the EC Treaty and now taken over by Parts I and III of the Constitution. 
Listina ne spreminja sistema pravic, ki so bile dodeljene s Pogodbo ES in so sedaj povzete v I. in III. delu Ustave.
Paragraph 3 is intended to ensure the necessary consistency between the Charter and the ECHR by establishing the rule that, insofar as the rights in the present Charter also correspond to rights guaranteed by the ECHR, the meaning and scope of those rights, including authorised limitations, are the same as those laid down by the ECHR. 
Namen tretjega odstavka je zagotoviti potrebno usklajenost med Listino in EKČP z vzpostavitvijo pravila, da sta vsebina in obseg navedenih pravic, vključno z dovoljenimi omejitvami, enaka kot vsebina in pomen pravic, ki ju določa EKČP, kolikor pravice v tej listini ustrezajo tudi pravicam, zagotovljenim z EKČP.
This means in particular that the legislator, in laying down limitations to those rights, must comply with the same standards as are fixed by the detailed limitation arrangements laid down in the ECHR, which are thus made applicable for the rights covered by this paragraph, without thereby adversely affecting the autonomy of Union law and of that of the Court of Justice of the European Union. 
To zlasti pomeni, da mora zakonodajalec pri določanju omejitev navedenih pravic upoštevati enaka merila, določena s podrobno ureditvijo o omejitvah, podano v EKČP, ki tako postanejo veljavna za pravice, zajete v tem odstavku, ne da bi to škodilo avtonomiji prava Unije in Sodišča Evropske unije.
The reference to the ECHR covers both the Convention and the Protocols to it. 
Sklicevanje na EKČP zajema Konvencijo in njene protokole.
The meaning and the scope of the guaranteed rights are determined not only by the text of those instruments, but also by the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and by the Court of Justice of the European Union. 
Vsebina in obseg zagotovljenih pravic nista določena le z besedilom navedenih aktov, temveč tudi s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije.
The last sentence of the paragraph is designed to allow the Union to guarantee more extensive protection. 
Namen zadnjega stavka v odstavku je Uniji omogočiti, da zagotavlja širše varstvo.
In any event, the level of protection afforded by the Charter may never be lower than that guaranteed by the ECHR. 
V vsakem primeru raven varstva, ki jo nudi Listina, ne sme biti nižja od ravni, ki jo zagotavlja EKČP.
The Charter does not affect the possibilities of Member States to avail themselves of Article 15 ECHR, allowing derogations from ECHR rights in the event of war or of other public dangers threatening the life of the nation, when they take action in the areas of national defence in the event of war and of the maintenance of law and order, in accordance with their responsibilities recognised in Articles I-5 (1), III-131, III-262 of the Constitution. 
Listina ne vpliva na možnost držav članic, da uporabijo 15. člen EKČP, ki dovoljuje razveljavitve pravic EKČP v primeru vojne ali ob drugi splošni nevarnosti, ki ogroža življenje naroda, če sprejmejo ukrepe na področju nacionalne obrambe v primeru vojne ali na področju vzdrževanja javnega reda in miru v skladu z njihovimi obveznostmi iz prvega odstavka I-5. člena, in III-131. ter III-262. člena Ustave.
The list of rights which may at the present stage, without precluding developments in the law, legislation and the Treaties, be regarded as corresponding to rights in the ECHR within the meaning of the present paragraph is given hereafter. 
Seznam pravic, za katere bi lahko v sedanji fazi in brez izključitve razvoja na področju prava, zakonodaje in pogodb, veljalo, da ustrezajo pravicam v EKČP v smislu tega odstavka, je podan v nadaljevanju.
It does not include rights additional to those in the ECHR. 
Ne vključuje pravic, ki so dodane pravicam v EKČP.
Articles of the Charter where both the meaning and the scope are the same as the corresponding Articles of the ECHR: 
Členi, katerih pomen in področje uporabe sta enaka kot pomen in področje uporabe ustreznih členov EKČP:
? Article 11 corresponds to Article 10 of the ECHR without prejudice to any restrictions which Union law may impose on Member States&apos; right to introduce the licensing arrangements referred to in the third sentence of Article 10(1) of the ECHR 
? člen 11 ustreza 10. členu EKČP ne glede na omejitve, ki jih pravo Unije lahko naloži državam članicam glede pravice do uvedbe dogovora o izdaji dovoljenj iz tretjega stavka prvega odstavka 10. člena EKČP;
? Article 19(2) corresponds to Article 3 of the ECHR as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights 
? drugi odstavek člena 19 ustreza 3. členu EKČP, kakor ga razlaga Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice;
Articles where the meaning is the same as the corresponding Articles of the ECHR, but where the scope is wider: 
Členi, katerih pomen je sicer enak kot pomen ustreznih členov EKČP, njihovo področje uporabe pa širše:
? Article 9 covers the same field as Article 12 of the ECHR, but its scope may be extended to other forms of marriage if these are established by national legislation 
? člen 9 zajema enako področje kot 12. člen EKČP, vendar pa se njegovo področje uporabe lahko razširi na druge vrste poroke, če slednje predvideva nacionalna zakonodaja;
? Article 12(1) corresponds to Article 11 of the ECHR, but its scope is extended to European Union level 
? prvi odstavek člena 12 ustreza 11. členu EKČP, vendar se njegovo področje uporabe razširi na raven Unije;
? Article 14(1) corresponds to Article 2 of the Protocol to the ECHR, but its scope is extended to cover access to vocational and continuing training 
? prvi odstavek člena 14 ustreza 2. členu Protokola k EKČP, vendar se njegovo področje uporabe razširi, tako da zajema dostop do poklicnega in nadaljnjega usposabljanja;
? Article 14(3) corresponds to Article 2 of the Protocol to the ECHR as regards the rights of parents 
? tretji odstavek člena 14 ustreza 2. členu Protokola k EKČP, kar zadeva pravice staršev;
? Article 47(2) and (3) correspond to Article 6(1) of the ECHR, but the limitation to the determination of civil rights and obligations or criminal charges does not apply as regards Union law and its implementation 
? drugi in tretji odstavek člena 47 ustrezata prvemu odstavku 6. člena EKČP, vendar omejitev na odločanje o civilnih pravicah in obveznostih ali o kazenskih obtožbah ne velja, kar zadeva pravo Unije in njegovo izvajanje;
? Article 50 corresponds to Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the ECHR, but its scope is extended to European Union level between the Courts of the Member States. 
? člen 50 ustreza 4. členu Protokola št. 7 k EKČP, vendar se njegovo področje uporabe razširi na raven Evropske unije med sodišča držav članic;
? Finally, citizens of the European Union may not be considered as aliens in the scope of the application of Union law, because of the prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of nationality. 
? končno se državljane Evropske unije ne sme obravnavati kot tujce v okviru področja uporabe prava Unije, in sicer zaradi prepovedi vsakršne diskriminacije glede na državljanstvo.
The limitations provided for by Article 16 of the ECHR as regards the rights of aliens therefore do not apply to them in this context. 
Zanje se omejitve, predvidene s 16. členom EKČP v zvezi s pravicami tujcev, v tem okviru ne uporabljajo.