natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Council broadly shared the Commission's view and has, as a compromise, proposed a new Article linking the laboratory requirements in the animal health and official controls proposals. 
Svet se je na splošno strinjal z mnenjem Komisije in je kot kompromis predlagal nov člen, ki bi povezal zahteve za laboratorije v predlogih o zdravju živali in o uradnem nadzoru.
The intention of the Commission's proposal was to integrate all relevant animal health rules for all animal species and categories under one set of rules. 
Namen predloga Komisije je bil združiti vsa relevantna pravila o zdravju živali za vse živalske vrste in kategorije v enoten sklop pravil.
Member State's strategic measures for non-listed diseases: the European Parliament required (amendments 29 and 107) that strategic measures are taken by Member States for diseases, including those that are assessed as not relevant for the Union and therefore not listed for Union intervention. 
Strateški ukrepi držav članic za bolezni, ki niso na seznamu: Evropski parlament je zahteval (spremembi 29 in 107), da države članice sprejemajo strateške ukrepe za bolezni, vključno s tistimi, ki so ocenjene kot nerelevantne za Unijo in jih zato ni na seznamu za ukrepanje na ravni Unije.
5.3 Statement by the Commission on the regular reporting on the use of antimicrobial medicinal products in animals in the Union 
5.3 Izjava Komisije o rednem poročanju v zvezi z uporabo protimikrobnih zdravil pri živalih v Uniji
In its Communication to the European Parliament, the Commission indicated that it could accept in full, in part, in principle or subject to rewording 106 of the 331 amendments, as they would clarify or improve the Commission's proposal and were consistent with its general aims. 
V svojem sporočilu Evropskemu parlamentu je Komisija navedla, da bi lahko v celoti, delno, načeloma ali po preoblikovanju besedila sprejela 106 od 331 sprememb, saj bi te spremembe, ki so skladne s splošnimi cilji predloga Komisije, predlog Komisije pojasnile ali izboljšale.
Other professionals and professional bodies carrying out certain tasks on behalf of the competent authority: the European Parliament requested that certain professionals, such as bee health professionals, would be recognised on the same basis as veterinarians (amendments 103 and 110) and that certain other qualified individuals or professional bodies would be allowed to carry out certain tasks (amendments 19 and 109). 
Drugi strokovnjaki in strokovna združenja, ki v imenu pristojnih organov izvajajo določene naloge: Evropski parlament je zahteval, da se določeni strokovnjaki, kot so strokovnjaki za zdravje čebel, priznavajo enako kot veterinarji (spremembi 103 in 110) in da se določenim drugim usposobljenim posameznikom ali strokovnim združenjem dovoli izvajanje določenih nalog (spremembi 19 in 109).
5.2 Joint statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on antimicrobial resistance and the use of veterinary medicinal products 
5.2 Skupna izjava Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije o protimikrobni odpornosti in uporabi zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini
National measures: the European Parliament proposed amendments 37, 268 and 323, which allow a Member State to restrict the movements of animals or products if the Member State itself judges that it is scientifically justified and necessary to prevent the introduction or spread of any disease. 
Nacionalni ukrepi: Evropski parlament je predlagal spremembe 37, 268 in 323, ki državam članicam dovoljujejo omejevanje premikov živali ali proizvodov, če država članica sama presodi, da je to znanstveno utemeljeno in potrebno zaradi preprečevanja vnosa ali širjenja bolezni.
This would ensure that animals such as dogs and cats could be dealt with in a coherent manner from an animal health perspective, whether they are kept or stray animals, and whether they are traded commercially or moved for non-commercial purposes as pets. 
To bi zagotovilo skladno obravnavo živali, kot so psi in mački, s stališča zdravja živali ne glede na to, ali so gojene ali potepuške živali, in na to, ali so predmet komercialnega trgovanja ali premikov v nekomercialne namene kot hišne živali.
Eventually, the European Parliament was willing to give up other amendments on antimicrobial resistance and veterinary medicines, but requested in return a joint statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on antimicrobial resistance, and a Commission statement on the regular reporting on the use of antimicrobial medicinal products in animals in the Union. 
Nazadnje je bil Evropski parlament pripravljen opustiti druge spremembe v zvezi s protimikrobno odpornostjo in zdravili za uporabo v veterinarski medicini, vendar je v zameno zahteval skupno izjavo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije o protimikrobni odpornosti ter izjavo Komisije o rednem poročanju o uporabi protimikrobnih zdravil pri živalih v Uniji.
The Commission can agree to amendment 94 as reworded in the Council's position, support the joint statement on the antimicrobial resistance and, as a compromise, make a statement on the regular reporting on the use of veterinary antimicrobial medicinal products. 
Komisija se lahko strinja s spremembo 94 v ubeseditvi iz stališča Sveta, podpre skupno izjavo o protimikrobni odpornosti in kot kompromis pripravi izjavo o rednem poročanju o uporabi protimikrobnih zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini.
The amendments of the European Parliament that were reinforcing this intention were considered acceptable by the Commission and were supported by the Council. 
Spremembe Evropskega parlamenta, ki so okrepile ta namen, šteje Komisija za sprejemljive, podpira pa jih tudi Svet.
The Commission proposed to repeal the current identification and registration legislation so that all animal health issues come under one set of general principles. 
Komisija je predlagala razveljavitev trenutne zakonodaje o identifikaciji in registraciji, da bi za vsa vprašanja v zvezi z zdravjem živali veljal enoten sklop splošnih načel.
The European Parliament could eventually drop or adjust several of its amendments but asked the Commission for a commitment to take future action for the protection of animals through a statement on animal welfare. 
Evropski parlament bi sčasoma lahko opustil ali prilagodil več svojih sprememb, a je od Komisije v obliki izjave o dobrobiti živali zahteval zavezo, da bo v prihodnosti sprejela ukrepe za zaščito živali.
This Regulation lays down rules for the prevention and control of animal diseases which are transmissible to animals or to humans and does not contain provisions which regulate specifically animal welfare, albeit animal health and welfare are linked. 
Ta uredba določa pravila za preprečevanje in obvladovanje živalskih bolezni, ki se prenašajo na živali ali na človeka, ne vsebuje pa določb, ki posebej urejajo dobrobit živali, čeprav sta zdravje in dobrobit živali povezana.
In a spirit of a compromise, this solution is acceptable for the Commission. 
Ta rešitev je za Komisijo v duhu kompromisa sprejemljiva.
It also recognised the scope of the proposed act, which is about transmissible animal diseases, and welcomed the "one health" approach establishing a clear link between animal welfare and animal and public health. 
Priznal je tudi obseg predlaganega akta, ki se nanaša na prenosljive živalske bolezni, in pozdravil pristop „enega zdravja", ki vzpostavlja jasno povezavo med dobrobitjo živali na eni ter zdravjem živali in javnim zdravjem na drugi strani.
The Commission agrees with the Council's position and therefore accepts the retention of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000, which concerns labelling of beef and beef products and is outside the scope of the animal health proposal. 
Komisija se strinja s stališčem Sveta in zato sprejema ohranitev Naslova II Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000, ki zadeva označevanje govejega mesa in proizvodov iz govejega mesa ter je zunaj področja uporabe predloga o zdravju živali.
Some were accepted by the Council (see point 3.2) while others (for example amendments 173, 180, 194 and 257) went further providing animal welfare rules, thus interfering with the existing animal welfare legislation and potentially undermining disease control measures in emergency situations. 
Nekatere je Svet sprejel (glej točko 3.2), druge (npr. spremembe 173, 180, 194 in 257) pa so bolj podrobno določale pravila o dobrobiti živali ter s tem posegale v obstoječo zakonodajo na področju dobrobiti živali in potencialno spodkopavale ukrepe za nadzor bolezni v izrednih razmerah.
The Parliament took the view that the Pet Regulation should continue to be in place. 
Parlament je zavzel stališče, da bi morala uredba o hišnih živalih ostati v veljavi.
Therefore, it proposed a 10 year period of application for the Pet Regulation together with a set of rules in the animal health proposal matching those laid down in the Pet Regulation and replacing them after the 10 year application period. 
Zato je za uredbo o hišnih živalih predlagal desetletno obdobje uporabe, skupaj s sklopom pravil v predlogu o zdravju živali v skladu s pravili iz uredbe o hišnih živalih, in njihovo zamenjavo po desetletnem obdobju uporabe.
The Commission can therefore support the proposed Council's solutions. 
Komisija zato lahko podpre rešitev, ki jo predlaga Svet.
Moreover, the European Parliament pointed out that recently amended Article 22 of the Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 provided for fixed control intensity for identification and registration of bovine animals. 
Poleg tega je Evropski parlament poudaril, da se je z nedavno spremembo člena 22 Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000 fiksno določila intenziteta nadzora identifikacije in registracije govedi.
In this context, stray or feral animals, including those of species normally domesticated, are considered as ‘wild animals'. 
V tem smislu veljajo potepuške ali podivjane živali, vključno s tistimi iz vrst, ki so običajno udomačene, za „divje živali".
The Council, in its position, agreed and proposed a slight rewording. 
Svet se je v svojem stališču strinjal in predlagal manjše preoblikovanje besedila.
The Council has tried to meet the Parliament's concern without undermining the original intention of the Commission proposal by clarifying the definition of aquaculture animals and making clearer which disease prevention and control rules apply to aquaculture and which to ‘wild aquatic' animals. 
Svet je poskušal upoštevati pomisleke Parlamenta, ne da bi s tem spodkopal izvorni namen predloga Komisije, in je jasneje opredelil živali iz akvakulture in jasneje določil, katera pravila za preprečevanje in nadzor bolezni veljajo za akvakulturo in katera za „prostoživeče vodne" živali.
The Commission clarified that even though the proposal had indicated that the entire Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 would be repealed, the Commission's intention was not to repeal parts that concern labelling of beef and beef products. 
Komisija je pojasnila, da je bilo v predlogu sicer navedeno, da se razveljavi celotna Uredba (ES) št. 1760/2000, vendar namen Komisije ni bila razveljavitev delov, ki zadevajo označevanje govejega mesa in proizvodov iz govejega mesa.
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION 
SPOROČILO KOMISIJE
The Parliament also agreed to the proposed list of five diseases in Article 5 and to the possible listing of other diseases in an Annex amendable by delegated act, while implementing powers were preserved for the categorisation of animal diseases (following Article 8). 
Strinjal se je tudi s predlaganim seznamom petih bolezni v členu 5 in morebitno uvrstitvijo drugih bolezni v prilogo, ki bi se spreminjala z delegiranim aktom, medtem ko se izvedbena pooblastila omejijo na razvrščanje živalskih bolezni (v skladu s členom 8).
Consultation with stakeholders and scientists: the European Parliament, in its amendments 41, 66, 75, 77, 82, 157, 260 and 322, required several types of specific consultation when drawing up delegated acts. 
Posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi in znanstveniki: Evropski parlament je v svojih spremembah 41, 66, 75, 77, 82, 157, 260 in 322 zahteval več vrst posebnih posvetovanj med pripravo delegiranih aktov.
Categorisation of animal diseases and emerging diseases: the European Parliament proposed in its amendments 83-87 new wording clarifying the groups of categories of animal diseases provided for in Article 8 of the Commission's proposal. 
Razvrščanje živalskih in porajajočih se bolezni: Evropski parlament je v svojih spremembah 83-87 predlagal novo ubeseditev, ki pojasnjuje skupine kategorij živalskih bolezni iz člena 8 predloga Komisije.
The Commission shares the Council's position. 
Komisija se strinja s stališčem Sveta.
Retaining legislation on identification and registration of pigs and ovine and caprine animals: the European Parliament, in its amendments 238, 326 and 327, asked to retain Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 on ovine and caprine identification and registration, and Directive 2008/71/EC on pig identification and registration. 
Ohranitev zakonodaje o identifikaciji in registraciji prašičev, ovc in koz: Evropski parlament je v svojih spremembah 238, 326 in 327 zahteval ohranitev Uredbe (ES) št. 21/2004 o identifikaciji in registraciji ovc in koz ter Direktive 2008/71/ES o identifikaciji in registraciji prašičev.
The Council accepted the logic of the Commission's proposal and added some clarifications including a full Part on non-commercial movements of pet animals, which distinguishes the movements of animals kept for companion purposes from stray and other animals. 
Svet je sprejel logiko predloga Komisije in dodal nekaj pojasnil, ki vključujejo tudi cel del o netrgovskih premikih hišnih živali, ki razlikuje med premiki hišnih ljubljenčkov ter potepuškimi in drugimi živalmi.
The Council could therefore not accept these amendments. 
Zato Svet navedenih sprememb ni mogel sprejeti.
Veterinary medicinal products: the Parliament's amendments 94, 159, 160, 162 and 163-165 regulate the use of the veterinary medicinal products in the Union in a way that interferes with the existing legislation on veterinary medicines and entails significant overlaps with Commission proposal on veterinary medicines. 
Zdravila za uporabo v veterinarski medicini: Spremembe Parlamenta 94, 159, 160, 162 in 163-165 urejajo uporabo zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini v Uniji tako, da posegajo v obstoječo zakonodajo o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini, in zato pomenijo znatna prekrivanja s predlogom Komisije o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini.
The Council addressed the same questions by opening the possibility for Member States to authorise other professionals for certain tasks while taking into account the subsidiarity principle enabling Member States to take their own decisions concerning authorisation based on the existing national structures. 
Ista vprašanja je obravnaval tudi Svet in ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti, ki državam članicam omogoča, da sprejemajo lastne odločitve v zvezi z odobritvami, ki temeljijo na obstoječih nacionalnih strukturah, državam članicam omogočil, da za določene naloge pooblastijo druge strokovnjake.
The Commission's proposal made a clear distinction between ‘kept animals' and ‘wild animals' and animal disease prevention and control rules that could be applied to animals kept under human control and those applied to animals that are not under human control. 
Predlog Komisije je jasno razlikoval med „gojenimi živalmi" in „divjimi živalmi" ter med pravili za preprečevanje in nadzor živalskih bolezni, ki bi se lahko uporabljala za živali pod človekovim nadzorom, in pravili, ki se uporabljajo za živali, ki niso pod človekovim nadzorom.
Listing of animal diseases: the European Parliament proposed, in a series of amendments (in particular amendments 13, 14, 65-67, 70-72, 76, 77, 80-82, 88-90) to eliminate the Commission's implementing powers under Articles 5, 7 and 8 enabling to establish the list of animal diseases and species to which the rules in the Regulation apply, and the categorisation of diseases into different groups according to which measures are appropriate for them. 
Uvrščanje živalskih bolezni na seznam: Evropski parlament je v vrsti sprememb (zlasti spremembah 13, 14, 65-67, 70-72, 76, 77, 80-82, 88-90) predlagal odpravo izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije iz členov 5, 7 in 8 za pripravo seznama živalskih bolezni in vrst, za katere se uporabljajo pravila iz Uredbe, ter za razvrščanje bolezni v različne skupine glede na ukrepe, ki so zanje primerni.
The Commission proposal made a distinction between ‘kept animals' and ‘wild animals' where aquaculture animals were considered as kept aquatic animals. 
Predlog Komisije je razlikoval med „gojenimi živalmi" in „divjimi živalmi", živali iz akvakulture pa so veljale za gojene vodne živali.
Repeal of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 on bovine identification and beef labelling: the European Parliament proposed in its amendments 38, 324 and 328 the retention of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 on bovine identification and beef labelling, which the animal health proposal aimed to repeal. 
Razveljavitev Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000 o identifikaciji govedi in označevanju govejega mesa: Evropski parlament je v svojih spremembah 38, 324 in 328 predlagal ohranitev Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000 o identifikaciji govedi in označevanju govejega mesa, ki bi jo predlog o zdravju živali razveljavil.
The European Parliament has supported those changes. 
Evropski parlament je navedene spremembe podprl.
Non-commercial movements of pet animals: several amendments of the European Parliament (amendments 36, 39, 40, 54, 239-244, 246-247, 263-267 and 325) entail the retention of the Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 on the non-commercial movement of pet animals (the "Pet Regulation"), which was to be repealed by the animal health proposal. 
Netrgovski premiki hišnih živali: Številne spremembe Evropskega parlamenta (spremembe 36, 39, 40, 54, 239-244, 246-247, 263-267 in 325) pomenijo ohranitev Uredbe (EU) št. 576/2013 o netrgovskih premikih hišnih živali („uredba o hišnih živalih"), ki naj bi bila razveljavljena s predlogom o zdravju živali.
Also, all amendments that were overlapping or inconsistent with the existing requirements - or putting at risk animal and public health - were not incorporated in the Council's position. 
Poleg tega ni bila v stališče Sveta vključena nobena sprememba, ki se prekriva ali je v neskladju z obstoječimi zahtevami ali ki ogroža zdravje živali in javno zdravje.
Aquatic animals, changes in definitions related to aquaculture: the European Parliament suggested amendments 50, 291-296, 300-304, 306 and 307 introducing a new category of "kept aquatic animals" thus separating ‘aquaculture' and other ‘kept aquatic' animals. 
Vodne živali, spremembe opredelitev pojmov v zvezi z akvakulturo: Evropski parlament je v spremembah 50, 291-296, 300-304, 306 in 307 predlagal uvedbo nove kategorije „gojenih vodnih živali" in s tem razlikovanje med „akvakulturo" in drugimi „gojenimi vodnimi" živalmi.
‘Non-kept', stray and feral animals: several amendments of the European Parliament (amendments 49, 51, 53, 74, 198-201, 203, 211-215, 218) aimed to define stray, feral or ‘non-kept' animals as different categories from ‘wild' animals. 
„Negojene", potepuške in podivjane živali: Cilj številnih sprememb Evropskega parlamenta (spremembe 49, 51, 53, 74, 198-201, 203, 211-215, 218) je bil opredeliti potepuške, podivjane ali „negojene" živali kot kategorije različne od „divjih" živali.
3.5 Amendments of the European Parliament rejected by the Commission and not incorporated in the position of the Council at first reading 
3.5 Spremembe Evropskega parlamenta, ki jih je Komisija zavrnila in niso bile vključene v stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi
As part of the overall compromise, the Commission can accept the amendment proposed by the European Parliament, subject to rewording provided for in the Council's position. 
Komisija lahko spremembo Evropskega parlamenta, ob preoblikovanju besedila iz stališča Sveta, sprejme kot del splošnega kompromisa.
The Council incorporated those amendments into its position subject to some rewording. 
Svet je te spremembe z manjšim preoblikovanjem besedila vključil v svoje stališče.
The European Parliament supported those changes. 
Evropski parlament je navedene spremembe sprejel.
The Council proposed that a short list of five significant diseases is written into the enacting part of the Regulation, but that the listing of the remaining of diseases, as well as the categorisation of all the listed diseases, and listing of species, should be done through implementing acts. 
Svet je predlagal, da se kratek seznam petih pomembnih bolezni zapiše v normativni del Uredbe, da pa bi se morali uvrščanje preostalih bolezni na seznam, kakor tudi razvrščanje vseh bolezni na seznamu ter uvrščanje vrst na seznam izvesti z izvedbenimi akti. Svet je tudi dodal več meril za uvrščanje živalskih bolezni na seznam in njihovo razvrščanje (v povezavi s členom 5 oziroma 8), ki so po njihovem mnenju normativnemu delu predloga Komisije dodali bistvene manjkajoče elemente.
3.4 Amendments of the European Parliament accepted by the Commission in full, in part or in principle, but not incorporated in the position of the Council at first reading 
3.4 Spremembe Evropskega parlamenta, ki jih je Komisija sprejela v celoti, delno ali načeloma, a niso bile vključene v stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi
3.2 Amendments of the European Parliament accepted by the Commission and incorporated in full, in part or in principle in the position of the Council at first reading 
3.2 Spremembe Evropskega parlamenta, ki jih je Komisija sprejela in so bile v celoti, delno ali načeloma vključene v stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi
EN 1 EN 
SL 1 SL
concerning the 
v zvezi s
3.3 Amendments of the European Parliament rejected by the Commission and incorporated in full, in part or in principle in the position of the Council at first reading 
3.3 Spremembe Evropskega parlamenta, ki jih je Komisija zavrnila in so bile v celoti, delno ali načeloma vključene v stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi
There is currently no need to introduce any changes in this respect. 
Trenutno ni potrebe, da bi v zvezi s tem uvedli kakršne koli spremembe.
Since then, additional 8 Member States have signed the agreement. 
Odtlej je sporazum podpisalo še 8 držav članic.
Member States who have so far not provided the requested information have been reminded to do so. 
Države članice, ki doslej še niso zagotovile zahtevanih informacij, so bili opozorjene, da to storijo.
Further details and examples are given later in the report. 
Druge podrobnosti in primeri so podani v nadaljevanju poročila.
However, the biggest challenge has been the recent Ebola epidemic. 
Največji izziv pa je nedavna epidemija ebole.
[1: OJ L 293, 5.11.2013, p. 
[1: UL L 293, 5.11.2013, str.
The new version of this IT tool was put in place on 4 February 2015. 
Nova različica tega informacijskega orodja je bila uvedena 4. februarja 2015.
Of the remaining messages, 90 were alert notifications and 78 were information messages. 
Od preostalih sporočil jih je 90 predstavljalo objave opozoril, 78 pa je bilo informacijskih sporočil.
The recent Ebola epidemic has not only been a devastating crisis for the affected West African countries but also had significant repercussions for Europe. 
Nedavna epidemija ebole ni le uničujoča kriza za prizadete zahodnoafriške države, temveč je imela tudi pomembne posledice za Evropo.
On 20 June 2014, the Joint Procurement Agreement was signed between 14 Member States and the Commission. 
Sporazum o skupnem javnem naročanju je 20. junija 2014 podpisalo 14 držav članic in Komisija.
A number of recommendations based on the results of 'stress tests' carried out in 2013 by the Commission have been taken into account, including a strict 'user-access' policy. 
Upoštevana so bila številna priporočila na podlagi rezultatov „stresnih testov", ki jih je leta 2013 izvedla Komisija, vključno s strogo politiko „dostopa uporabnikov".
From 5 November 2013 until 4 September 2015, a total of 168 messages were posted with 354 comments. 
Med 5. novembrom 2013 in 4. septembrom 2015 je bilo objavljenih skupaj 168 sporočil s 354 komentarji.