natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
All those who replied stated that no legislative amendments are necessary at this stage and that efforts should be concentrated instead on properly implementing the current regulations. 
Vsi tisti, ki so odgovorili, so navedli, da zakonodajne spremembe za zdaj niso potrebne in da bi bilo treba prizadevanja namesto tega usmeriti v pravilno izvajanje veljavnih predpisov.
Defence of rights (Article 3) 
Varstvo pravic (člen 3)
Member States' legislative frameworks provide for the possibility of dialogue with stakeholders. 
Zakonodajni okviri držav članic omogočajo dialog z deležniki.
This is the case in all Member States except Italy where trade unions appear to be able to engage in proceedings only in case of collective discriminations. 
Tako je v vseh državah članicah razen v Italiji, kjer lahko sindikati sodelujejo v postopkih le v primeru kolektivnih diskriminacij.
However, the volume of amendments varied substantially - from one specific act (Malta, Cyprus, Greece, Portugal) to amendments of dozens of legal acts (Lithuania, Romania). 
Vendar se je obseg sprememb precej razlikoval, od enega posameznega akta (Malta, Ciper, Grčija in Portugalska) do sprememb velikega števila pravnih aktov (Litva in Romunija).
In this regard, the Commission recalls its proposal to establish a European Labour Authority, presented as part of the Social Fairness Package on 13 March 2018. 
Komisija v zvezi s tem opozarja na svoj predlog o ustanovitvi Evropskega organa za delo, ki ga je predstavila 13. marca 2018 v okviru svežnja za socialno pravičnost.
Mostly, this is ensured through procedural rules on non-discrimination in general that existed even before the Directive entered into force. 
To je večinoma zagotovljeno s postopkovnimi pravili o nediskriminaciji na splošno, ki so obstajala že pred začetkom veljavnosti Direktive.
The aim of this proposal is to strengthen the fairness of cross-border labour mobility in Europe. 
Cilj tega predloga je krepitev pravičnosti čezmejne mobilnosti delovne sile v Evropi.
However, to date information on how often bodies provide legal and/or other assistance is scarce. 
Vendar so najnovejše informacije o tem, kako pogosto organi zagotavljajo pravno in/ali drugo pomoč, redke.
France has not provided the clarification requested about how it implements this provision. 
Francija ni poslala zahtevanega pojasnila glede načina izvajanja te določbe.
So were the spouses' lack of knowledge of the local language. 
Enako velja tudi za to, da zakonci ne znajo lokalnega jezika.
The Commission has also used information collected by its network of legal experts on the free movement of workers and social security coordination. 
Komisija je uporabila tudi informacije, ki jih je zbrala njena mreža pravnih strokovnjakov za prosto gibanje delavcev in koordinacijo socialne varnosti.
This is particularly important where the Directive has been implemented by assigning additional tasks to existing bodies (paragraph 1 of Article 4 read in conjunction with recital 18). 
To je zlasti pomembno, kadar se Direktiva izvaja tako, da obstoječim organom dodeljuje dodatne naloge (člen 4(1) v povezavi z uvodno izjavo 18).
Since November 2017, free movement bodies have been designated in all Member States, although in France, Italy and the United Kingdom this appointment has not been publicised in line with the requirements of Article 6(1). 
Od novembra 2017 so bili v vseh državah članicah določeni organi za prosto gibanje, čeprav v Franciji, Italiji in Združenem kraljestvu to imenovanje ni bilo objavljeno v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 6(1).
In Austria and Belgium, the Directive is transposed through acts at both federal and regional levels. 
V Avstriji in Belgiji je bila Direktiva v nacionalno zakonodajo prenesena z akti na zvezni in regionalni ravni.
Better provision of information at national level to Union workers and members of their family (Article 6) 
Boljše zagotavljanje informacij delavcem Unije in njihovim družinskim članom na nacionalni ravni (člen 6)
Particular attention has to be paid to the independence of legal assistance provided to persons covered by the Directive. 
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti neodvisnosti pravne pomoči, zagotovljene osebam, zajetim v Direktivi.
The Commission has also consulted the members of the Advisory Committee on the Free Movement of Workers by sending them a detailed questionnaire (hereinafter 'the questionnaire') and, afterwards, the draft report. 
Komisija se je posvetovala tudi s člani Svetovalnega odbora za prosto gibanje delavcev, tako da jim je poslala podrobni vprašalnik (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vprašalnik) in nato osnutek poročila.
It is important that information on obstacles, restrictions and discrimination is collected, assessed and disseminated publicly. 
Informacije o oviranju, omejevanju in diskriminaciji je treba zbrati, oceniti in javno objaviti.
It appears that in Lithuania and Portugal protection is limited to labour relations only, so it does not protect, for example, jobseekers who potentially may be victimised by public authorities. 
Zdi se, da je zaščita v Litvi in na Portugalskem omejena le na delovna razmerja, tako na primer ne ščiti iskalcev zaposlitve, ki bi jih morda lahko viktimizirali javni organi.
In some instances, information is scattered across many national websites, making it difficult to access and fragmented. 
V nekaterih primerih so informacije razpršene po številnih nacionalnih spletiščih, zaradi česar so težko dostopne in razdrobljene.
Denmark, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom considered that their national legislation already complies with the Directive and that no further legislative measures are necessary. 
Danska, Francija, Španija, Italija, Nizozemska in Združeno kraljestvo so menili, da je njihova nacionalna zakonodaja že skladna z Direktivo in da dodatni zakonodajni ukrepi niso potrebni.
Body (or bodies) to promote equal treatment (Article 4) 
Organ (ali organi) za spodbujanje enakega obravnavanja (člen 4)
Germany and Lithuania indicated that there have been cases where organisations have engaged in judicial/administrative procedures to support workers. 
Nemčija in Litva sta poročali o primerih, v katerih so organizacije začele sodne/upravne postopke, da so podprle delavce.
In doing so, it will also make use of data gathered in the annual report on intra-EU mobility, which provides an overview of cross-border mobility within the EU and may reveal obstacles to it (see footnote 27). 
Pri tem bo prav tako uporabljala podatke, zbrane v letnem poročilu o mobilnosti znotraj EU, ki vsebuje pregled čezmejne mobilnosti v EU, in morda odkrila ovire zanjo (glej opombo 27).
Most Member States made amendments to their national legislation. 
Večina držav članic je spremenila nacionalno zakonodajo.
Nevertheless, the replies to the questionnaire suggest that the Directive has had a positive impact for all stakeholders. 
Kljub temu pa izpolnjeni vprašalniki kažejo, da je Direktiva pozitivno vplivala na vse deležnike.
However, given the relatively high quality standards established by the Directive (paragraph 2), ensuring that such information is comprehensive, up to date, clear and available in several languages remains a challenge in most cases. 
Glede na razmeroma visoke standarde kakovosti, določene v Direktivi (odstavek 2), pa je zagotavljanje, da bi bile take informacije celovite, najnovejše, jasne in na voljo v več jezikih, v večini primerov še vedno izziv.
These include Your Europe, SOLVIT, EURES, Enterprise Europe Network and the Point of Single Contact. 
Mednje so vključene Tvoja Evropa, SOLVIT, EURES, Evropska podjetniška mreža in enotne kontaktne točke.
The Commission will keep monitoring the implementation of the Directive. 
Komisija bo še naprej spremljala izvajanje Direktive.
Estonia referred to two complaints that were dealt with by non-judicial authorities in 2017. 
Estonija je navedla dve pritožbi, ki so ju leta 2017 obravnavali izvensodni organi.
Only a few Member States unequivocally mentioned that they had allocated additional resources for the performance of the new tasks. 
Le nekaj držav članic je jasno navedlo, da so za izvajanje novih nalog dodelile dodatna sredstva.
This source of information should complement existing platforms, such as EURES advisers, SOLVIT and Your Europe Advice, which can assist the more than 11.8 million mobile Union citizens of working age who live outside their country of citizenship,. 
S tem virom informacij bi bilo treba dopolniti obstoječe platforme, kot so svetovalci EURES, mreža SOLVIT in storitev Tvoja Evropa - nasveti, ki lahko pomagajo več kot 11,8 milijona delovno sposobnim mobilnim državljanom Unije, ki živijo zunaj svoje države državljanstva, .
In accordance with Article 9 of the Directive, this report discusses the Directive's implementation. 
To poročilo v skladu s členom 9 Direktive obravnava njeno izvajanje.
In many countries, however, such dialogue rarely relates specifically to the free movement of workers (except, for example, in Bulgaria), is not regular or does not explicitly involve non-governmental organisations. 
Vendar se tak dialog v številnih državah redko nanaša le na prosto gibanje delavcev (razen na primer v Bolgariji), ni reden ali ne vključuje izrecno nevladnih organizacij.
The list of bodies is made available online by the European Commission. 
Evropska komisija je seznam organov objavila na spletu.
Some countries use social media applications (or plan to do so) to reach people in need of information. 
Nekatere države uporabljajo (ali nameravajo uporabljati) aplikacije družbenih medijev, da dosežejo ljudi, ki potrebujejo informacije.
Likewise, therefore, the Commission does not consider it necessary to propose amendments to the Directive at this stage. 
Zato se Komisiji za zdaj ne zdi potrebno, da bi predlagala spremembe Direktive.
Personal and material scope (Articles 1 and 2) 
Osebno in stvarno področje uporabe (člena 1 in 2)
In Croatia foreign nationals who temporarily reside there are eligible to free legal aid subject to the principle of reciprocity. 
Na Hrvaškem so tuji državljani, ki tam začasno prebivajo, upravičeni do brezplačne pravne pomoči na podlagi načela vzajemnosti.
Recital 15 of the Directive invites Member States to examine the implementation of common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms, as provided for in the Commission's Recommendation of 11 June 2013. 
Uvodna izjava 15 Direktive države članice poziva, naj preučijo izvajanje skupnih načel za mehanizme kolektivnih opustitvenih in odškodninskih tožb, kot je določeno v Priporočilu Komisije z dne 11. junija 2013.
The bodies' independence is particularly relevant in countries where they are not stand-alone structures that per se would ensure at least some degree of independence. 
Neodvisnost organov je posebej pomembna v državah, kjer ti niso samostojne strukture, ki bi jim bila kot takim zagotovljena vsaj določena mera neodvisnosti.
The Directive obliges Member States to ensure that their bodies not only cooperate with bodies in other Member States but also make use of the existing information and assistance services at Union level. 
Direktiva države članice zavezuje, da zagotovijo, da njihovi organi ne le sodelujejo z organi v drugih državah članicah, temveč tudi uporabljajo obstoječe informacijske in podporne storitve na ravni Unije.
In the vast majority of Member States existing structures have been attributed the role of free movement body, the only exceptions being Germany and Slovenia where a new structure has been established. 
V veliki večini držav članic je bila vloga organa za prosto gibanje dodeljena obstoječim strukturam, pri čemer sta edini izjemi Nemčija in Slovenija, kjer je bila ustanovljena nova struktura.
Only Austria, Estonia, Greece and a trade union in Lithuania pointed to independent assistance in legal proceedings actually being provided. 
Le Avstrija, Estonija, Grčija in sindikat iz Litve so opozorili na to, da se neodvisna pomoč v pravnih postopkih dejansko zagotavlja.
The report is mainly based on information about the measures to transpose the Directive that Member States have communicated to the Commission under Article 8 of the Directive. 
Poročilo temelji večinoma na informacijah o ukrepih za prenos Direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo, ki so jih države članice sporočile Komisiji v skladu s členom 8 Direktive.
The bodies' additional workload varies substantially depending on the number of incoming and outgoing mobile workers. 
Dodatna delovna obremenitev organov se precej razlikuje, odvisna pa je od števila prihajajočih in odhajajočih mobilnih delavcev.
These Member States have not adopted any legal act implementing the Directive. 
Te države članice niso sprejele nobenega pravnega akta o izvajanju Direktive.
In accordance with Article 8 of the Directive, Member States had to transpose the Directive by 21 May 2016. 
Države članice so morale Direktivo v skladu s členom 8 Direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo prenesti do 21. maja 2016.
The Directive is already operational and the Commission has not detected major problems of non-conformity among the national transposition measures. 
Direktiva se že uporablja in Komisija ni odkrila večjih težav z neskladnostjo med nacionalnimi ukrepi za prenos.
References to the national laws transposing the Directive can be found on the Eur-Lex webpage. 
Sklici na nacionalne zakone, s katerimi se Direktiva prenaša v nacionalno zakonodajo, so na voljo na spletišču Eur-Lex.
Nevertheless, both Articles did encourage some Member States to verify that their existing national rules indeed complied with the personal and material scope of the above provisions. 
Vendar sta oba člena nekatere države članice kljub temu spodbudila, da so preverile, ali so njihova veljavna nacionalna pravila dejansko skladna z osebnim in stvarnim področjem uporabe navedenih določb.
It will also focus on creating better and more efficient conditions to accompany labour mobility in Europe through closer cooperation between national authorities. 
Usmeril se bo tudi v ustvarjanje boljših in učinkovitejših pogojev, ki bodo spremljali mobilnost delovne sile v Evropi, s tesnejšim sodelovanjem med nacionalnimi organi.
A Commission report of 26 January 2018 provides more details about the progress made by Member States in implementing collective redress measures. 
V poročilu Komisije z dne 26. januarja 2018 je podrobneje opisan napredek držav članic pri izvajanju ukrepov kolektivnih tožb.
Recent Union initiatives in this field as well as the proposal to establish a European Labour Authority should further help to maximise awareness of the key free movement rights. 
Nedavne pobude Unije na tem področju ter predlog o ustanovitvi Evropskega organa za delo bi morali nadalje prispevati k čim večji ozaveščenosti o bistvenih pravicah do prostega gibanja.
Some of these difficulties that Union workers face result from the misapplication of EU law by national authorities and/or private entities. 
Nekatere od teh težav, s katerimi se srečujejo delavci Unije, izhajajo iz nepravilne uporabe prava Unije s strani nacionalnih organov in/ali zasebnih subjektov.
Member States should continue making sure that persons concerned are aware of the bodies and the support they provide. 
Države članice bi si morale še naprej prizadevati, da bi zadevne osebe poznale organe in podporo, ki jo zagotavljajo.
This right has been further developed through secondary law, in particular Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union. 
Ta pravica je bila nadalje razvita s sekundarno zakonodajo, zlasti Uredbo (EU) št. 492/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. aprila 2011 o prostem gibanju delavcev v Uniji.
This can not only improve general awareness of rights and the procedures to defend them but also deter other employers and administrations from engaging in such practices. 
To ne bo le izboljšalo splošne ozaveščenosti o pravicah in postopkih za njihovo zaščito, temveč bo tudi druge delodajalce in uprave odvrnilo od izvajanja takih praks.
Most Member States either have formal rules obliging national authorities to cooperate or provide relevant information to each other, or else nominate one of the authorities as ‘coordinating body'. 
Večina držav članic ima bodisi uradna pravila, ki nacionalne organe zavezujejo k medsebojnemu sodelovanju ali zagotavljanju ustreznih informacij, bodisi imenuje enega od organov za „usklajevalni organ".
In accordance with recital 28, the Commission has also looked into the possible difficulties faced by young graduates looking for employment across the Union and by third-country spouses of Union workers. 
Komisija bi morala v skladu z uvodno izjavo 28 tudi preučiti morebitne težave, s katerimi se srečujejo mladi diplomanti, ki iščejo zaposlitev po vsej Uniji, in tisti zakonci delavcev Unije, ki prihajajo iz tretjih držav.
Most countries focus on: (1) providing assistance, mainly consisting of information and legal advice; (2) raising awareness about free movement rights and the activities of the bodies using various information channels; and/or (3) strengthening cooperation with other stakeholders. 
Večina držav je usmerjena v: (1) zagotavljanje pomoči, ki v glavnem obsega informacije in pravne nasvete, (2) ozaveščanje o pravicah do prostega gibanja in dejavnostih organov z uporabo različnih informacijskih kanalov in/ali (3) povečanje sodelovanja z drugimi deležniki.
In many countries the provision of information is still an ongoing process, with new websites being established or existing ones revamped, information leaflets being prepared or information campaigns being conducted. 
V številnih državah zagotavljanje informacij še vedno poteka, vzpostavljajo se nova spletišča ali prenavljajo obstoječa, pripravljajo se informativne brošure ali pa izvajajo informacijske kampanje.
Legislative amendments in many countries have been limited to transposing Article 4 on the designation of the body to promote equal treatment. 
Zakonodajne spremembe so bile v številnih državah omejene na prenos člena 4 o določitvi organa za spodbujanje enakega obravnavanja v nacionalno zakonodajo.
As part of the ongoing conformity check it is in contact with the Member States on the issues identified in this report. 
V okviru trenutnega preverjanja skladnosti ima stike z državami članicami o vprašanjih iz tega poročila.
[34: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Labour Authority (COM(2018) 131 final, 13.3.2018).] 
[34: Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega organa za delo (COM(2018) 131 final, 13.3.2018).]
The questionnaire asked Member States' authorities as well as social partners whether they consider that amendments to the Directive (or other legislation on free movement of workers) are necessary. 
V vprašalniku je bilo organom držav članic in socialnim partnerjem postavljeno vprašanje, ali menijo, da so potrebne spremembe Direktive (ali druge zakonodaje o prostem gibanju delavcev).
They related to certain practices of public institutions on the recognition of professional qualifications and the granting of a right to reside for a family member of a Union national. 
Nanašali sta se na nekatere prakse javnih ustanov glede priznavanja poklicnih kvalifikacij in podelitev pravice do prebivanja za družinskega člana državljana Unije.
It appears that in Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, Spain and the United Kingdom the independence of the bodies can be questioned. 
Zdi se, da je v Bolgariji, na Hrvaškem, Cipru, Madžarskem, v Latviji, na Poljskem, Slovaškem, v Španiji in Združenem kraljestvu vprašljiva neodvisnost organov.
As required under the Directive, there are no limitations on defending violated rights even after the relationship in which the alleged restriction and obstacle or discrimination occurred has ended. 
Kot se zahteva v skladu z Direktivo, pri varstvu kršenih pravic ni omejitev, in sicer tudi po tem, ko se je razmerje, v katerem se je zgodilo domnevno omejevanje in oviranje ali diskriminacija, že končalo.
In September 2016 the Commission started infringement procedures against 12 Member States that had still failed to notify complete transposition of the Directive. 
Komisija je septembra 2016 začela postopke ugotavljanja kršitev zoper 12 držav članic, ki še vedno niso priglasile, da so Direktivo v celoti prenesle v nacionalno zakonodajo.
[17: For more information, see Joint report on the application of Council Directive 2000/43/EC and of Council Directive 2000/78/EC (COM(2014) 2 final, 17.1.2014) and Report on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC (COM)2015)190 final, 5.5.2015.] 
[17: Za dodatne informacije glej Skupno poročilo o uporabi Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES in Direktive Sveta 2000/78/ES (COM(2014) 2 final, 17.1.2014) ter Poročilo o uporabi Direktive Sveta 2000/113/ES (COM(2015) 190 final, 5.5.2015).]
The lack of information is explained by the fact that the Directive has been put in place only recently, that free movement bodies (Article 4) have not collected such information yet or that such cases are not grouped on the basis of discrimination against Union workers according to nationality. 
Pomanjkanje informacij je mogoče pojasniti z dejstvom, da je bila Direktiva uvedena šele pred kratkim, da organi za prosto gibanje (člen 4) še niso zbrali takih informacij ali da take zadeve niso združene na podlagi diskriminacije delavcev Unije glede na državljanstvo.
The Commission is now finalising its analysis of the conformity of national measures to ensure that the Directive is correctly implemented. 
Komisija zdaj končuje analizo skladnosti nacionalnih ukrepov zaradi zagotovitve pravilnega izvajanja Direktive.
Only Malta and Cyprus have adopted special provisions on victimisation after transposing the Directive. 
Posebne določbe o viktimizaciji sta po prenosu Direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo sprejela samo Malta in Ciper.
The analysis of national transposition measures reveals that a number of the provisions of the Directive have already been complied with through national instruments that already existed when the Directive entered into force. 
Analiza nacionalnih ukrepov za prenos v nacionalno zakonodajo kaže, da je bilo več določb Direktive že izpolnjenih z nacionalnimi instrumenti, ki so obstajali že ob začetku veljavnosti Direktive.
No Member State mentioned implementing any of the Directive's provisions through collective agreements. 
Nobena država članica ni omenila, da bi katero koli od določb Direktive izvedla s kolektivnimi pogodbami.
However, they seem to be limited and/or to happen ad hoc as there seem to be no concrete procedures or developed practices yet on how cooperation is carried out. 
Vendar so omejeni in/ali priložnostni, saj konkretni postopki ali razvite prakse o načinu izvajanja sodelovanja še ne obstajajo.
In general, Member States envisaged non-legislative measures to implement provisions related to, in particular, functioning of the bodies (see 3.3) and/or improving access to (quality) information (see 3.5). 
Države članice so za izvajanje določb, povezanih zlasti z delovanjem organov (glej oddelek 3.3) in/ali izboljšanjem dostopa do (kakovostnih) informacij (glej oddelek 3.5), na splošno predvidele nezakonodajne ukrepe.
The Commission will continue working with the Member States to ensure that the Directive is completely and correctly transposed and implemented in all of them. 
Komisija bo še naprej sodelovala z državami članicami za zagotovitev, da se Direktiva v vsaki od njih v celoti in pravilno prenese v nacionalno zakonodajo.
To try to close the gap between the law and its application in practice, on 16 April 2014 the European Parliament and the Council adopted Directive 2014/54/EU on measures facilitating exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers (hereinafter 'the Directive'). 
Evropski parlament in Svet sta vrzel med zakonodajo in njeno uporabo v praksi poskusila zapolniti tako, da sta 16. aprila 2014 sprejela Direktivo 2014/54/EU o ukrepih za lažje uresničevanje pravic, podeljenih delavcem v okviru prostega gibanja delavcev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Direktiva).