natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To ensure effective information flow and monitoring of the impacts at EU level, respondents suggest: 
Za zagotavljanje učinkovitega pretoka informacij in spremljanje vplivov na ravni EU so anketiranci predlagali:
prioritising public health over commercial gains; and 
dajanju prednosti javnemu zdravju pred tržno koristjo ter
Stakeholders suggested new EU actions to address the sustainability of vaccination programmes: 
Zainteresirane strani so predlagale nove ukrepe EU za obravnavo trajnosti programov cepljenja, in sicer:
complementing central authorisation procedures with independent vaccine testing; 
dopolnjevanje osrednjih postopkov za pridobitev dovoljenja za promet z neodvisnimi preskušanji cepiv;
Developing an electronic vaccination record was the most endorsed e-health investment with almost unanimous consensus. 
Oblikovanje elektronskih evidenc o cepljenju je bila najbolj podprta naložba v storitve e-zdravja, ki je bila deležna širokega soglasja.
improving the quality and supply of vaccines through more R&D. 
izboljšanju kakovosti cepiv in preskrbe z njimi na podlagi več raziskav in razvoja.
Respondents to the public consultation and the targeted consultation almost unanimously agree that EU action on vaccine research take place within and outside the EU. 
Anketiranci v javnem in usmerjenem posvetovanju se skoraj soglasno strinjajo, da naj se raziskave EU na področju cepiv izvajajo tako znotraj kot zunaj EU.
The main concerns for vaccine hesitant respondents were (i) side effects and vaccine ingredients, (ii) perceived lack of safety and effectiveness of vaccines, (iii) imposition of mandatory vaccination, (iv) lack of vaccine injury compensation schemes, (v) financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry, (vi) lack of transparent and industry-independent scientific research, (vii) perceived unilateral information on benefits, but not on risks, and (viii) mistrust in public authorities. 
Glavni pomisleki anketirancev, ki ne zaupajo v cepljenje, so bili (i) stranski učinki in sestavine cepiv, (ii) domnevno pomanjkanje varnosti in učinkovitosti cepiv, (iii) uvedba obveznega cepljenja, (iv) pomanjkanje odškodninskih shem v primeru poškodb zaradi cepljenja, (v) finančni interesi farmacevtske industrije, (vi) pomanjkanje preglednih znanstvenih raziskav, ki so neodvisne od industrije, (vii) domnevno enostranske informacije o koristih, ne pa tudi tveganjih ter (viii) nezaupanje v javne organe.
The introduction of an electronic vaccination record was strongly supported. 
Močno podporo je dobila uvedba elektronske evidence o cepljenju.
opening the debate for supporters and opponents to give a balance of benefits and risks; and 
začetkom razprav podpornikov in nasprotnikov cepljenja o razmerju med tveganjem in koristjo ter
Respondents to the public consultation and the targeted consultation consider that Member States should collaborate with industry on a crisis management plan to forecast and reduce risks during vaccine manufacturing. 
Anketiranci v javnem in usmerjenem posvetovanju menijo, da bi morale države članice sodelovati z industrijo pri pripravi načrta kriznega upravljanja, da bi predvidele in zmanjšale tveganja pri proizvodnji cepiv.
Other suggestions focused on educating the public: 
Drugi predlogi so se osredotočali na izobraževanje javnosti, in sicer na:
Feedback on the roadmap supported improving education programmes and health promotion through digital tools. 
Iz povratnih informacij o načrtu je razvidna podpora izboljšanju izobraževalnih programov in promociji zdravja z digitalnimi orodji.
enhancing the joint procurement system and improving coordination of EU vaccination schedules; and 
izboljšanje sistema skupnega javnega naročanja in boljšo uskladitev razporedov cepljenja na ravni EU ter
Key suggestions arising from the targeted consultation were to (i) involve pharmacists in vaccine administration, (ii) include immunisation in a wider preventive healthcare concept, (iii) focus more on adult vaccination, and (iv) upgrade access to information and data by the ECDC and EMA. 
Glavni predlogi, ki izhajajo iz usmerjenega posvetovanja, so bili (i) vključitev farmacevtov v izvajanje cepljenja, (ii) vključitev imunizacije v širši koncept preventivnega zdravstvenega varstva, (iii) večja osredotočenost na cepljenje odraslih ter (iv) boljši dostop do informacij ter podatkov ECDC in EMA.
Stakeholders also suggest speeding up R&D by: 
Zainteresirane strani so predlagale tudi pospešitev raziskav in razvoja, in sicer z:
developing hard mandates (e.g. mandatory vaccination for high-risk groups); 
pripravo strogih obvez (npr. obvezno cepljenje za ranljive skupine);
display images of vaccine-preventable diseases, on the model of cigarette packs; and 
prikazovanje slik bolezni, ki jih je mogoče preprečiti s cepljenjem, po vzoru cigaretnih zavojčkov ter
Over 50% of the respondents to the public consultation considered that the fear of side effects, lack of information on risks, introduction of mandatory vaccination and levels of confidence in the effectiveness of vaccines have the highest impact on vaccine hesitancy. 
Več kot 50 % anketirancev v javnem posvetovanju je bilo mnenja, da imajo največji vpliv na nezaupanje v cepljenje strah pred stranskimi učinki, pomanjkanje informacij o tveganjih, uvedba obveznega cepljenja ter stopnje zaupanja v učinkovitost cepiv.
Stakeholders suggest that EU coordination on vaccine shortages could be improved by: 
Zainteresirane strani so predlagale, da bi usklajevanje na ravni EU glede pomanjkanja cepiv izboljšali z:
The feedback on the roadmap also supported better access to information. 
Iz povratnih informacij o načrtu je razvidna podpora boljšemu dostopu do informacij.
Feedback on the roadmap called for more focus on vaccine injuries, including setting up independent European vaccine adverse effect reporting (VAER) systems. 
Povratne informacije o načrtu so vsebovale poziv k večji osredotočenosti na poškodbe zaradi cepljenja, vključno z vzpostavitvijo evropskih sistemov za poročanje o škodljivih učinkih cepljenja.
To promote vaccination, stakeholders propose: 
Za spodbujanje cepljenja zainteresirane strani predlagajo:
Respondents to the public consultation and the targeted consultation also called for healthcare professionals to be more involved in promoting vaccination by providing training and information material. 
Anketiranci v javnem in usmerjenem posvetovanju so prav tako pozvali k večji vključenosti zdravstvenih strokovnjakov v spodbujanje cepljenja, in sicer z usposabljanjem in informativnim gradivom.
[24: Those citizens not providing any opinion were not considered on this matter.] 
[24: Državljani, ki niso podali svojega mnenja, niso bili vključeni.]
aligning vaccination schedules and policies; 
usklajevanje razporedov in politik cepljenja;
Pillar I: tackling vaccine hesitancy 
Steber I: Odprava nezaupanja v cepljenje
Stakeholders that responded to the targeted consultation called for greater focus on adolescent and adult vaccinations. 
Zainteresirane strani, ki so sodelovale v usmerjenem posvetovanju, so pozvale k večji osredotočenosti na cepljenje najstnikov in odraslih.
ensuring industry's support for public health-led, independent vaccine studies; and 
zagotavljanjem podpore industrije neodvisnim študijam o cepivih, ki se osredotočajo na javno zdravje, ter
Stakeholders that responded to the public consultation and the targeted consultation believe the key policy interventions to mitigate vaccine shortages are forecasting and joint procurements. 
Zainteresirane strani, ki so sodelovale v javnem in usmerjenem posvetovanju, menijo, da sta glavna ukrepa politike za zmanjšanje pomanjkanja cepiv napovedovanje potreb in skupno javno naročanje.
To increase vaccine production and reduce lead times, stakeholders suggest: 
Za povečanje proizvodnje cepiv in skrajšanje dobavnih rokov zainteresirane strani predlagajo:
updated information on a single platform should be set up by the ECDC (as the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention); 
bi moral ECDC (enako kot ameriški centri za obvladovanje in preprečevanje bolezni) vzpostaviti enotno platformo s posodobljenimi informacijami;
improving vaccination coverage of healthcare professionals, through voluntary encouragement/incentives or mandatory requirement. 
povečanje precepljenosti zdravstvenih strokovnjakov s spodbujanjem prostovoljnega cepljenja ali z uvedbo obveznega cepljenja.
Feedback on the roadmap suggested that the Commission should improve its engagement with vaccine hesitant groups. 
Povratne informacije o načrtu so pokazale, da bi morala Komisija izboljšati sodelovanje s skupinami, ki ne zaupajo v cepljenje.
Better cooperation between actors in tackling vaccine hesitancy 
Boljše sodelovanje akterjev pri odpravi nezaupanja v cepljenje
Stakeholders that responded to the targeted consultation believe in need to promote continuous education on vaccination to pharmacists. 
Zainteresirane strani, ki so sodelovale v usmerjenem posvetovanju, menijo, da je potrebno nadaljnje izobraževanje farmacevtov o cepljenju.
Stakeholders also suggested: 
Zainteresirane strani so predlagale tudi:
[15: Answering the open consultation only. 
[15: Odgovarjali le na odprto posvetovanje.
Stakeholders identified new EU cooperation areas for vaccination: 
Zainteresirane strani so opredelile nova področja sodelovanja na ravni EU v zvezi s cepljenjem, in sicer:
They also propose: 
Te prav tako predlagajo:
Equal access to vaccination programmes and vaccine hesitancy was identified as the main challenges. 
Glavna izziva sta enak dostop do programov cepljenja in nezaupanje v cepljenje.
aligning with the GLOPID and the CEPI for developing new vaccines; 
usklajevanjem z globalnim raziskovalnim sodelovanjem za pripravljenost na nalezljive bolezni (GLOPID) in koalicijo za inovacije na področju pripravljenosti na epidemije (CEPI) za razvoj novih cepiv;
They also suggested: 
Predlagale so tudi:
On the EU's communication on vaccine safety and effectiveness, over 60% of citizens and stakeholders believe that it is inadequate. 
Več kot 60 % državljanov in zainteresiranih strani meni, da obveščanje EU o varnosti in učinkovitosti cepiv ni ustrezno.
distinguish essential vaccines (e.g. polio) from voluntary ones (e.g. influenza); 
razlikovanje med osnovnimi (npr. proti otroški paralizi) in prostovoljnimi cepivi (npr. proti gripi);
ensuring all healthcare professionals receive relevant vaccination themselves; 
ustrezno cepljenje vseh zdravstvenih strokovnjakov;
[14: The OPC respondents were not involved on this topic.] 
[14: Anketiranci v spletnem javnem posvetovanju niso bili vključeni v to temo.]
[3: https://ec.europa.eu/info/consultations/open-public-consultation-strengthened-cooperation-against-vaccine-preventable-diseases_en#how_to_submit][4: The questionnaire was not available in Gaelic.] 
[3: https://ec.europa.eu/info/consultations/open-public-consultation-strengthened-cooperation-against-vaccine-preventable-diseases_en#how_to_submit.
promoting cooperation between vaccine industry and WHO; and 
spodbujanje sodelovanja med industrijo cepiv in Svetovno zdravstveno organizacijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SZO) ter
Educating and informing the public on vaccination using a local, face-to-face approach was emphasised. 
Poudarjen je bil lokalen in oseben pristop pri izobraževanju in obveščanju javnosti o cepljenju.
[7: By the respondents to the public consultation and the targeted consultation.] 
[10: Odgovarjali na spletno javno posvetovanje in usmerjeno posvetovanje.]
Introduction and legal basis 
Uvod in pravna podlaga
More specifically: 
Natančneje:
The delegation of power is to be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. 
Prenos pooblastila se samodejno podaljša za enako obdobje, razen če Evropski parlament ali Svet nasprotuje temu podaljšanju najpozneje tri mesece pred koncem vsakega obdobja.
The report is to be drawn up not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period of the delegation, starting from 17 July 2014. 
Poročilo se pripravi najpozneje devet mesecev pred koncem petletnega obdobja prenosa pooblastila z začetkom 17. julija 2014.
Furthermore, the existing horizontal rules on food information to consumers provided in Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 are regarded as sufficient. 
Poleg tega obstoječa horizontalna pravila o zagotavljanju informacij o živilih potrošnikom iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1169/2011 veljajo za zadostna.
The Commission is of the view that any new requirements or rules on bovine animal identification should be adopted based on delegated powers conferred upon the Commission by the Animal Health Law. 
Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba vse nove zahteve ali pravila za identifikacijo govedi sprejeti na podlagi pooblastil, prenesenih nanjo s pravili o zdravju živali.
In this respect, there is currently no technological development reported regarding new means of identification of bovine animals. 
V zvezi s tem se do zdaj ni poročalo o tehnološkem razvoju glede novih sredstev za identifikacijo govedi.
At this stage, the Commission does not consider proceeding with the preparation of delegated acts in relation to the delegated power referred to in Article 15a since no specific need to further harmonise voluntary beef labelling has been identified. 
Na tej stopnji Komisija ne namerava nadaljevati s pripravo delegiranih aktov v zvezi s prenesenim pooblastilom iz člena 15a, saj ni bila ugotovljena posebna potreba po nadaljnjem usklajevanju prostovoljnega označevanja govejega mesa.
Exercise of the delegation 
Izvajanje pooblastila
Therefore, further technical progress needs to be reported before proceeding with the preparation of a delegated act in relation to new means of identification of bovine animals; 
Zato mora biti sporočen nadaljnji tehnološki napredek, preden se nadaljuje s pripravo delegiranega akta glede novih sredstev za identifikacijo govedi;
Since the simplification of the voluntary labelling by Regulation (EU) No 653/20147 amending the Bovine Identification Regulation, there were no circumstances indicating a need to regulate such definitions and requirements by way of a delegated act. 
Od poenostavitve prostovoljnega označevanja z Uredbo (EU) št. 653/20147, ki je spremenila uredbo o identifikaciji govedi, ni bilo okoliščin, ki bi nakazovale potrebo po reguliranju takšnih opredelitev in zahtev z delegiranim aktom.
Since the Commission has adopted those rules by Decision 2001/672/EC, no additional circumstances have been discussed which would require the adoption of specific requirements by way of a delegated act; 
Ker je Komisija ta pravila sprejela z Odločbo 2001/672/ES, niso potekale razprave o dodatnih okoliščinah, zaradi katerih bi bilo treba z delegiranim aktom sprejeti posebne zahteve;
At this stage, no additional circumstances have been discussed which would require the adoption of specific requirements by way of a delegated act; 
Na tej stopnji niso potekale razprave o dodatnih okoliščinah, zaradi katerih bi bilo treba z delegiranim aktom sprejeti posebne zahteve;
Article 22b(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council (hereinafter 'the Bovine Identification Regulation') requires the Commission to present to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the exercise of the delegation conferred on the Commission by that Regulation. 
Člen 22b(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o identifikaciji govedi) zahteva, da Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o izvajanju pooblastila, prenesenega nanjo z navedeno uredbo.
By way of Decisions 2004/764/EC and 2006/28/EC, specific requirements have been adopted for bovine animals kept in nature reserves in the Netherlands and for calves of suckler cows that are not used for milk production (before the Bovine Identification Regulation was amended by Regulation (EU) No 653/2014). 
Z odločbama 2004/764/ES in 2006/28/ES so bile sprejete posebne zahteve za goveda v naravnih rezervatih na Nizozemskem in za teleta krav dojilj, ki se ne uporabljajo za proizvodnjo mleka (preden je bila uredba o identifikaciji govedi spremenjena z Uredbo (EU) št. 653/2014).
So far, the Commission has supplemented the requirements of the Bovine Identification Regulation concerning matters referred to in Articles 4(3), 4(5), 7(1), 7(6), 13(6) and 14 of that Regulation. 
Do zdaj je Komisija dopolnila zahteve uredbe o identifikaciji govedi v zvezi z zadevami iz člena 4(3) in (5), člena 7(1) in (6), člena 13(6) in člena 14 navedene uredbe.
The Commission does at this stage not consider to proceed with the preparation of delegated acts in relation to any of the delegated powers referred to in Articles 4(1), 4a(2), 5, 6(2) or 7(2) of the Bovine Identification Regulation since this Regulation is to be amended by Regulation (EU) 2016/4293 by deleting Articles 1 to 10 as from 21 April 2021. 
Komisija na tej stopnji ne namerava nadaljevati s pripravo delegiranih aktov v zvezi z nobenim od prenesenih pooblastil iz člena 4(1), člena 4a(2), člena 5, člena 6(2) ali člena 7(2) uredbe o identifikaciji govedi, saj bo ta z 21. aprilom 2021 spremenjena z Uredbo (EU) 2016/4293, tako da bodo črtani členi od 1 do 10.
(i) Article 13(6) of the Bovine Identification Regulation empowers the Commission to determine simplified origin labelling provisions for cases of very short stay of an animal in the Member State or third country of birth or of slaughter, to avoid unnecessary repetition. 
(i) s členom 13(6) uredbe o identifikaciji govedi je na Komisijo preneseno pooblastilo za sprejetje določb za poenostavljeno navajanje porekla v primerih, ko žival za zelo kratek čas ostane v državi članici ali tretji državi rojstva ali zakola, da bi se izognili nepotrebnemu ponavljanju.
(e) Articles 5 and 6(2) of the Bovine Identification Regulation empowers the Commission to lay down rules concerning the data to be exchanged between computerised databases of Member States and the information from the computerised database to be included in the animal passport, including transitional measures. 
(e) s členom 5 in členom 6(2) uredbe o identifikaciji govedi je na Komisijo preneseno pooblastilo za določitev pravil o podatkih, ki se izmenjujejo med računalniškimi bazami podatkov držav članic, in informacijah iz računalniških baz podatkov, ki se vključijo v potni list za živali, vključno s prehodnimi ukrepi.
Article 22b(2) of the Bovine Identification Regulation applies to the power to adopt delegated acts conferred on the Commission by Articles 4(1), 4(3), 4(5), 4a(2), 5, 6(2), 7(1), 7(2), 7(6), 13(6), 14 and 15a of that Regulation. 
Člen 22b(2) uredbe o identifikaciji govedi se uporablja za pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov, preneseno na Komisijo s členom 4(1), (3) in (5), členom 4a(2), členom 5, členom 6(2), členom 7(1), (2) in (6), členom 13(6), členom 14 ter členom 15a navedene uredbe.
(k) Article 15a of the Bovine Identification Regulation empowers the Commission to set up definitions and requirements applicable to terms or categories of terms that may be voluntarily put on the label by operators. 
(k) s členom 15a uredbe o identifikaciji govedi je na Komisijo preneseno pooblastilo za določitev opredelitev in zahtev, ki se uporabljajo za izraze ali kategorije izrazov, ki jih lahko nosilci dejavnosti prostovoljno dajo na etikete.
[10: Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 
[10: Uredba (EU) št. 1169/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o zagotavljanju informacij o živilih potrošnikom, spremembah uredb (ES) št. 1924/2006 in (ES) št. 1925/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter razveljavitvi Direktive Komisije 87/250/EGS, Direktive Sveta 90/496/EGS, Direktive Komisije 1999/10/ES, Direktive 2000/13/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, direktiv Komisije 2002/67/ES in 2008/5/ES in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 608/2004 (UL L 304, 22.11.2011, str.
(h) Article 7(6) of the Bovine Identification Regulation empowers the Commission to lay down the rules on the information to be included in the holding register. 
(h) s členom 7(6) uredbe o identifikaciji govedi je na Komisijo preneseno pooblastilo za določitev pravil o informacijah, ki jih je treba vključiti v register gospodarstva.
Since the Bovine Identification Regulation is to be amended by Regulation (EU) 2016/4293 by deleting the Articles 1 to 10, those rules shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with empowerments conferred on the Commission by the Articles 118(1)(b) and 118(1)(c) of the Animal Health Law; 
Ker bodo z Uredbo (EU) 2016/4293 črtani členi od 1 do 10 uredbe o identifikaciji govedi, Komisija ta pravila sprejme v skladu s pooblastili, prenesenimi nanjo s členom 118(1)(b) in 118(1)(c) pravil o zdravju živali;
Since the Bovine Identification Regulation is to be amended by Regulation (EU) 2016/429 by deleting the Articles 1 to 10, the requirements for the electronic means of identification shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with empowerments conferred on the Commission by the Articles 118(1)(a) and 120(2)(c) of the Animal Health Law; 
Ker bodo z Uredbo (EU) 2016/429 črtani členi od 1 do 10 uredbe o identifikaciji govedi, Komisija sprejme zahteve za elektronska sredstva za identifikacijo v skladu s pooblastili, prenesenimi nanjo s členom 118(1)(a) in členom 120(2)(c) pravil o zdravju živali;
(c) Article 4(5) of the Bovine Identification Regulation empowers the Commission to adopt the requirements for the alternative means of identification applied to bovine animals intended for cultural and sporting events, other than fairs and exhibitions, including transitional measures required for their introduction. 
(c) s členom 4(5) uredbe o identifikaciji govedi je na Komisijo preneseno pooblastilo za sprejemanje zahtev za nadomestna sredstva za identifikacijo, ki se uporabljajo za govedi, namenjene za kulturne in športne prireditve, razen sejmov in razstav, vključno s prehodnimi ukrepi, potrebnimi za njihovo uvedbo.
(f) Articles 7(1) of the Bovine Identification Regulation empowers the Commission to determine the exceptional circumstances in which Member States may extend the maximum time period within which keepers of bovine animals are obliged to report to the competent authority all movements to and from the holding and all births and deaths of animals of the holding. 
(f) s členom 7(1) uredbe o identifikaciji govedi je na Komisijo preneseno pooblastilo za določitev izjemnih okoliščin, v katerih lahko države članice podaljšajo rok, v katerem morajo imetniki goveda poročati pristojnemu organu o vseh premikih na gospodarstvo in z njega ter o vsakem rojstvu in poginu živali na gospodarstvu.
][3: Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law') (OJ L 84, 31.3.2016, p. 
][3: Uredba (EU) 2016/429 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2016 o prenosljivih boleznih živali in o spremembi ter razveljavitvi določenih aktov na področju zdravja živali („Pravila o zdravju živali") (UL L 84, 31.3.2016, str.