natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- of which JRC: 43 88 17 1 2 1 152 
- od tega JRC: 43 88 17 1 2 1 152
Council 71 0 0 71 
Svet 71 0 0 71
The set-up consists of either a two-shift arrangement (rate 1), a two-shift arrangement including nights, weekends and public holidays (rate 2) or a continuous 24-hour service (rate 4). 
Vzpostavljena vrsta storitve se izvaja kot dvoizmensko delo (stopnja 1), kot dvoizmensko delo, vključno ponoči, ob koncu tedna in med prazniki (stopnja 2), ali kot neprekinjeni delovni čas 24 ur na dan (stopnja 4).
Total 29 8 33 591 167 11 1 0 840 
Skupaj 29 8 33 591 167 11 1 0 840
- of which JRC: 33 149 16 1 0 8 207 
- od tega JRC: 33 149 16 1 0 8 207
Council 672 443.72 201 886.92 0 874 330.64 
Svet 672 443,72 201 886,92 0 874 330,64
EESC 8 223.32 0 0 8 223.32 
Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor 8 223,32 0 0 8 223,32
Reasons for shift work 
Razlogi za neprekinjeno ali izmensko delo
Institution Shift work Standby duty Arduous working conditions Total 
Institucija Neprekinjeno ali izmensko delo Stalna pripravljenost za delo Posebno težki delovni pogoji Skupaj
Reasons for standby duty 
Razlogi za stalno pripravljenost za delo
Total 152 3 86 91 137 10 45 524 
Skupaj 152 3 86 91 137 10 45 524
Council 0 0 0 19 45 7 0 71 
Svet 0 0 0 19 45 7 0 71
- of which JRC: 260 638.58 543 164.63 595 924.90 1 399 728.11 
- od tega JRC: 260 638,58 543 164,63 595 924,90 1 399 728,11
Court of Justice 24 0 0 24 
Sodišče 24 0 0 24
Total 5 791 622.37 1 704 822.64 622 521.54 8 118 966.55 
Skupaj 5 791 622,37 1 704 822,64 622 521,54 8 118 966,55
CoR-EESC: The joint shift work service has been operating at the CoR and at the EESC since 1 March 2017 to meet the need for continuous presence in the security service. 
Odbor regij - Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor: S 1. marcem 2017 je bilo v Odboru regij in Evropskem ekonomsko-socialnem odboru uvedeno skupno izmensko delo za pokrivanje potrebe po stalni prisotnosti v varnostni službi.
Court of Justice 7 16 1 0 0 0 24 
Sodišče 7 16 1 0 0 0 24
- of which JRC: 0 0 8 21 29 
- od tega JRC: 0 0 8 21 29
Council 11 57 3 0 0 0 71 
Svet 11 57 3 0 0 0 71
- of which JRC: 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 
- od tega JRC: 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 152
EEAS 27 0 0 11 38 
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje 27 0 0 11 38
CoR 16 446.64 11 773.65 0 28 220.29 
Odbor regij 16 446,64 11 773,65 0 28 220,29
EEAS 211 538.69 57 982.14 0 269 520.83 
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje 211 538,69 57 982,14 0 269 520,83
Council 0 76 0 9 0 0 85 
Svet 0 76 0 9 0 0 85
Total 33 155 25 1 0 8 222 
Skupaj 33 155 25 1 0 8 222
Council 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 85 
Svet 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 85
Court of Auditors 2 0 0 14 16 
Računsko sodišče 2 0 0 14 16
- of which JRC: 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 
- od tega JRC: 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29
EEAS 15 0 0 15 
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje 15 0 0 15
The types of shift work put in place are a twoshift arrangement (rate 1) and a continuous 24-hour service (rate 4). 
Vzpostavljeno neprekinjeno ali izmensko delo se izvaja kot dvoizmensko delo (stopnja 1) in kot neprekinjeni delovni čas 24 ur na dan (stopnja 4).
EEAS 0 0 11 16 0 11 0 0 38 
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje 0 0 11 16 0 11 0 0 38
- of which JRC: 138 0 14 152 
- od tega JRC: 138 0 14 152
Institution AD SC/AST CA Total 
Institucija AD SC-AST PU Skupaj
ESDP Tech. Inst. Ind. Action Total 
EVOP Tehnične naprave Posredne dejavnosti Skupaj
- of which JRC: 0 22 6 0 0 1 29 
- od tega JRC: 0 22 6 0 0 1 29
EEAS 6 9 0 0 0 0 15 
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje 6 9 0 0 0 0 15
EEAS 0 0 0 3 9 3 0 15 
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje 0 0 0 3 9 3 0 15
EEAS 0 37 0 1 0 0 38 
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje 0 37 0 1 0 0 38
Court of Auditors 0 0 0 13 3 0 0 0 16 
Računsko sodišče 0 0 0 13 3 0 0 0 16
coord. 
SL SL
In 2017, the standby service at home concerned 4 CoR staff and 2 EESC staff. 
Leta 2017 so bili v stalno pripravljenost za delo doma vključeni štirje zaposleni Odbora regij in dva zaposlena EESO.
Court of Justice 0 0 14 10 0 0 0 24 
Sodišče 0 0 14 10 0 0 0 24
The Commission therefore maintains it. 
Komisija ga bo zato ohranila.
These reasoned opinions represent 22 votes. 
Ta obrazložena mnenja predstavljajo 22 glasov.
Therefore, it tabled a proposal for legislative action. 
Zato je predložila predlog za zakonodajni ukrep.
The envisaged initiative does not change this approach. 
Predvidena pobuda tega pristopa ne spreminja.
Commission proposal for a Directive amending the Posting of Workers Directive 
Predlog Komisije za direktivo o spremembi direktive o napotitvi delavcev
In its Political Guidelines, the Commission undertook to promote a deeper and fairer Internal Market. 
V svojih političnih usmeritvah se je Komisija zavezala, da bo spodbujala bolj povezan in pravičnejši notranji trg.
Any posting activity has effects in at least two Member States. 
Vsaka napotitev vpliva vsaj na dve državi članici.
The Commission proposal introduces three main changes to the 1996 Directive: 
Predlog Komisije uvaja tri glavne spremembe direktive iz leta 1996:
It thus respects the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and does not interfere with the competence of national authorities and social partners".] 
Zato spoštuje načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti in ne posega v pristojnost nacionalnih organov in socialnih partnerjev."]
[1: http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/docs/pg_en.pdf ] 
[1: http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/docs/pg_sl.pdf.]
The principle of subsidiarity and Protocol No 2 
4.1 Načelo subsidiarnosti ter Protokol št. 2
This is only possible if the legislative framework within which posting takes place provides rules which are clear, fair and enforceable. 
To je mogoče samo, če zakonodajni okvir, znotraj katerega se napotitev opravi, določa pravila, ki so jasna, pravična in izvršljiva.
The Union has established and ensures the functioning of an Internal Market which is based on a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress. 
Unija je vzpostavila in zagotavlja delovanje notranjega trga, ki temelji na visoko konkurenčnem socialnem tržnem gospodarstvu, usmerjenem v polno zaposlenost in socialni napredek.
[5: National Parliaments have eight weeks within which to issue a reasoned opinion on a draft legislative act from the date of its transmission in the official languages of the Union. 
[5: Nacionalni parlamenti imajo na voljo osem tednov, da izdajo obrazloženo mnenje o osnutku zakonodajnega akta, in sicer od dneva njegovega prenosa v uradne jezike Unije.
[17: Point 2.6 of that Report reads as follows: "A regulative framework for posting of workers between Member States can only be established at EU level. 
[17: Točka 2.6 poročila navaja: „Regulativni okvir za napotitev delavcev med državami članicami se lahko vzpostavi samo na ravni EU.
The same legal determination is required when reviewing Commission legislative proposals under Protocol No 2. 
Enaka pravna opredelitev je potrebna pri pregledovanju zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije v skladu s Protokolom št. 2.
The subsidiarity arguments raised in the reasoned opinions of national Parliaments are the following: 
Argumenti glede subsidiarnosti v obrazloženih mnenjih nacionalnih parlamentov so naslednji:
In the present case, as regards subsidiarity, the explanatory memorandum stated: "An amendment to an existing Directive can only be achieved by adopting a new Directive." 
V tem primeru je v obrazložitvenem memorandumu v zvezi s subsidiarnostjo navedeno: „Sprememba obstoječe direktive je mogoča samo s sprejetjem nove direktive."
[7: Political Guidelines of the Commission, point 10 "A Union of Democratic Change", last paragraph: "The relationship with national Parliaments is of great importance to me, notably when it comes to enforcing the principle of subsidiarity. 
[7: Politične usmeritve Komisije, točka 10, „Unija demokratičnih sprememb", zadnji odstavek: „Odnos z nacionalnimi parlamenti je zame zelo pomemben, zlasti pri uveljavljanju načela subsidiarnosti.
The purpose of this Communication is to respond to these concerns as far as they relate to the principle of subsidiarity. 
Namen tega sporočila je odgovoriti na te pomisleke v zvezi z načelom subsidiarnosti.
In this regard, it should be noted that the proposal does not have the objective of aligning wages across Member States. 
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da cilj predloga ni uskladitev plač med državami članicami.
Where reasoned opinions issued by national Parliaments represent at least one third of all the votes allocated to them, the proposal must be reviewed by the Commission. 
Če obrazložena mnenja nacionalnih parlamentov predstavljajo vsaj eno tretjino vseh glasov, dodeljenih nacionalnim parlamentom, mora Komisija predlog ponovno preučiti.
In this connection, the Commission would like to recall that strengthening ties and forging a new partnership with national Parliaments as a way of bringing the Union closer to its citizens is one of its priorities. 
V zvezi s tem bi Komisija želela opozoriti, da je krepitev vezi in ustvarjanje novega partnerstva z nacionalnimi parlamenti kot približevanje Unije državljanom ena izmed njenih prednostnih nalog.
The Estonian Parliament makes a similar argument as far as the working conditions of posted workers are concerned. 
Estonski parlament navaja podoben argument glede delovnih pogojev napotenih delavcev.
On the basis of that review, the Commission may decide to maintain, amend or withdraw the proposal, and it must give reasons for its decision. 
Po ponovni preučitvi se Komisija lahko odloči, da bo predlog ohranila, ga spremenila ali umaknila, in svojo odločitev utemelji.
The obligation for all Member States to apply the rules in all sectors of the economy cannot be established at national level but must be laid down at Union level. 
Obveznosti za vse države članice, da uporabljajo pravila v vseh gospodarskih sektorjih, ni mogoče določiti na nacionalni ravni, ampak jo je treba vzpostaviti na ravni Unije.
"][8: In the Mission Letters to all the Members of the Commission, the President of the Commission indicated that "I want all Commissioners to commit to a new partnership with national Parliaments: they deserve particular attention and I want (…) important proposals or initiatives to be presented and explained in national Parliaments by Members of the Commission. 
"][8: V poslanicah vsem članom Komisije je predsednik Komisije poudaril: „Od vseh komisarjev želim, da se zavežejo novemu partnerstvu z nacionalnimi parlamenti: zaslužijo si posebno pozornost in želim (...), da člani Komisije pomembne predloge in pobude predstavijo in pojasnijo v nacionalnih parlamentih.
I will explore ways to improve the interaction with national Parliaments as a way of bringing the European Union closer to citizens. 
Proučil bom načine za izboljšanje interakcije z nacionalnimi parlamenti, kar bo Evropsko unijo približalo državljanom.
That principle leaves intact the competence of each Member State to determine those rights. 
To načelo ne posega v pristojnost vsake države članice, da določi navedene pravice.
The posting of workers plays therefore an essential role in the Internal Market, particularly in the cross-border provision of services. 
Napotitev delavcev ima zato ključno vlogo na notranjem trgu, zlasti pri čezmejnem opravljanju storitev.
[9: Article 5(3) TEU: "Under the principle of subsidiarity, in areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, the Union shall act only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level".] 
[9: Člen 5(3) PEU: „V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti Unija deluje na področjih, ki niso v njeni izključni pristojnosti, le če in kolikor države članice ciljev predlaganih ukrepov ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni, temveč se zaradi obsega ali učinkov predlaganih ukrepov lažje dosežejo na ravni Unije."]
Adequate level of action 
4.2.2 Ustrezna raven ukrepanja
Instead, it focuses on issues which pertain to the Union regulatory framework set by the original 1996 Directive. 
Osredotoča se na vprašanja, ki se nanašajo na regulativni okvir Unije, ki ga določa prvotna direktiva iz leta 1996.
Lack of express recognition of Member States' competences 
4.2.3 Pomanjkljivo izrecno priznavanje pristojnosti držav članic
The Danish Parliament does not contest the possibility for the Union to act in this matter or the fact that the option currently given by the 1996 Directive is made mandatory in the proposal. 
Danski parlament ne izpodbija možnosti za ukrepanje Unije na tem področju ali dejstva, da možnost, ki je določena v direktivi iz leta 1996, v predlogu postaja obveznost.
Therefore, the proposal for a targeted revision of the 1996 Directive and the Enforcement Directive are complementary to each other and mutually reinforcing. 
Zato se predlog za usmerjeno revizijo direktive o napotitvi delavcev iz leta 1996 in direktiva o izvrševanju dopolnjujeta in vzajemno krepita.
- Thirdly, the proposal provides that, whenever the anticipated duration of posting will be superior to 24 months or the effective duration of posting exceeds 24 months, the host Member State is deemed to be the country in which the work is habitually carried out. 
- tretjič, predlog določa, da se, če je predvideno trajanje napotitve več kot 24 mesecev ali če napotitev dejansko traja več kot 24 mesecev, država članica gostiteljica šteje za državo, v kateri se običajno opravlja delo.
The Court examines, in particular, whether the Commission's proposal and its impact assessment include sufficient information showing clearly and unequivocally the advantages of taking action at Union level rather than at Member State level. 
Sodišče zlasti preuči, ali predlog Komisije in njena ocena učinka vsebujeta dovolj elementov, iz katerih so jasno in nedvoumno razvidne prednosti, povezane z ukrepanjem na ravni Unije, in ne na ravni držav članic.
Indeed, the fact that the legal framework at Union level is not sufficiently harmonised contributes to a lack of knowledge of the rights both by workers, user undertakings and temporary agencies. 
Dejstvo, da pravni okvir na ravni Unije ni dovolj harmoniziran, prispeva k preslabem poznavanju pravic tako s strani delavcev kot tudi s strani podjetij uporabnikov in agencij za zagotavljanje začasnega dela.
[2: Document COM(2016) 128 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0128&qid=1459769597959&from=EN. 
[2: COM(2016) 128 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0128&qid=1459769597959&from=SL.
This statement should contain some assessment of the proposal's financial impact and, in the case of a directive, of its implications for the rules to be put in place by Member States, including, where necessary, the regional legislation".] 
Ta izjava mora vsebovati podatke o predvidenih finančnih učinkih osnutka, pri direktivah pa tudi o vplivu na predpise, ki jih morajo sprejeti države članice, po potrebi vključno z regionalno zakonodajo."]
Rules set by law or universally applicable collective agreements become mandatory for posted workers in all economic sectors. 
Pravila, ki so določena z zakonom ali splošno veljavnimi kolektivnimi pogodbami, postanejo obvezna za napotene delavce v vseh gospodarskih sektorjih.
Before drawing its conclusions, it engaged directly with national Parliaments on the issues raised, in particular at the Conference of Parliamentary Committees for Union Affairs of Parliaments of the EU (COSAC) meetings of 13 June 2016, where a preliminary exchange focused on procedural aspects took place, and of 11 July 2016, where a substantive discussion took place in the context of a broader debate on the social dimension of the EU. 
Pred sprejetjem odločitve je z nacionalnimi parlamenti neposredno razpravljala o izraženih pomislekih, zlasti na srečanju Konference odborov za evropske zadeve (COSAC) 13. junija 2016, na katerem je potekala predhodna izmenjava mnenj, osredotočena na procesne vidike, ter srečanju 11. julija 2016, na katerem so potekali izčrpni pogovori v okviru širše razprave o socialni razsežnosti EU.
The Commission proposal aims to remedy the specific problems identified by a limited number of targeted amendments to Directive 96/71/EC. 
Cilj predloga Komisije je odpraviti specifične težave, opredeljene v več ciljno usmerjenih spremembah Direktive 96/71/ES.
The Hungarian National Assembly considers that, by introducing the concept of "remuneration" instead of the current concept of "minimum rates of pay", the proposal does not provide any added value, because of the alleged lack of clarity of the notion of remuneration. 
Madžarska narodna skupščina meni, da z uvedbo pojma „plačilo za delo" namesto trenutnega pojma „minimalne urne postavke" predlog ne zagotavlja nobene dodane vrednosti, saj naj pojem „plačilo za delo" ne bi bil dovolj jasen.
All reasoned opinions, with the exception of that of the Danish Parliament, argue that the objective of the action could be better achieved at Member State level or that the Commission has not sufficiently proved that the action should be achieved at Union level. 
Vsa obrazložena mnenja, razen mnenje danskega parlamenta, navajajo, da je cilj ukrepa mogoče lažje doseči na ravni držav članic ali da Komisija ni v zadostni meri dokazala, da bi bilo ukrep treba izvesti na ravni Unije.
Member States having the option, but not the obligation, to apply such rules in sectors other than the construction sector does not fully achieve this objective. 
Možnost, vendar ne obveznost, da države članice ta pravila uporabljajo tudi v drugih sektorjih poleg gradbeništva, tega cilja ne uresničuje v celoti.
The procedure of Article 7(2) of Protocol No 2 is exclusively focused on the principle of subsidiarity as defined in Article 5(3) of the Treaty on the European Union (TEU). 
Postopek iz člena 7(2) Protokola št. 2 se osredotoča izključno na načelo subsidiarnosti, kot je opredeljeno v členu 5(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
In line with its commitment to ensure that national Parliaments have a strong voice in European decision-making, the Commission carefully analysed the reasoned opinions. 
V skladu s svojo zavezanostjo, da nacionalnim parlamentom zagotovi pomembnejšo vlogo pri postopku odločanja na evropski ravni, je Komisija obrazložena mnenja skrbno analizirala.
The proposal hence does not regulate remuneration, nor does it define remuneration or the constituent elements of remuneration at Union level. 
Predlog torej ne ureja plačila za delo niti ga ne opredeljuje, prav tako pa ne opredeljuje elementov plačila na ravni Unije.
Moreover, the fact that economic development may bring more convergence in the wages over time does not exclude the need to ensure - also in the interim - a level playing field for companies and an appropriate protection for posted workers. 
Poleg tega dejstvo, da gospodarski razvoj lahko sčasoma prinese večjo konvergenco plač, ne izključuje potrebe po zagotavljanju (tudi v vmesnem obdobju) enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za podjetja in ustrezne zaščite napotenih delavcev.
[13: Article 5 of Protocol No 2 provides that "draft legislative acts shall be justified with regard to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. 
[13: Člen 5 Protokola št. 2 določa: „Osnutki zakonodajnih aktov se utemeljijo glede na načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti.
Existing rules are sufficient and adequate 
4.2.1 Obstoječa pravila so zadostna in primerna
For the Danish Parliament, the subsidiarity concern is due to the fact that the proposal, contrary to Directive 96/71/EC, would not make explicit reference to the competence of Member States as far as the definitions of pay and terms and conditions of employment are concerned. 
Za danski parlament je pomislek o subsidiarnosti posledica dejstva, da v predlogu v nasprotju z Direktivo 96/71/ES ni izrecno omenjena pristojnost držav članic glede opredelitve plačila ter pogojev za delo in zaposlitev.
The rules on posting necessarily create rights and obligations between persons in different Member States - that is to say between an employer in the Member State of origin and a worker who temporarily resides in another Member State. 
Pravila o napotitvi ustvarjajo pravice in obveznosti med osebami v različnih državah članicah, tj. med delodajalcem v državi članici izvora in delavcem, ki začasno prebiva v drugi državi članici.
Posting, by definition, is of a cross-border nature. 
Napotitev delavcev je po naravi čezmejno vprašanje.
the proposal fails to recognise explicitly Member States' competences on remuneration and conditions of employment (point 4.2.3.) 
predlog ne priznava izrecno pristojnosti držav članic glede plačila in pogojev za delo in zaposlitev (točka 4.2.3);
The recitals of the draft Directive make clear why action at Union level is required to improve the Union regulatory framework concerning the posting of workers in some regards. 
Iz uvodnih izjav osnutka direktive je jasno razvidno, zakaj je potrebno ukrepanje na ravni Unije za izboljšanje nekaterih elementov regulativnega okvira Unije o napotitvi delavcev.
The proposal does not address any issue touched upon by the 2014 Enforcement Directive aimed at strengthening instruments to fight and sanction circumventions and fraud related to posting of workers. 
Predlog ne obravnava vprašanj iz direktive o izvrševanju iz leta 2014, katere namen je okrepitev instrumentov za boj proti izogibanju in goljufijam v zvezi z napotitvijo delavcev.
[11: Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I), OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 
[11: Uredba (ES) št. 593/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbena obligacijska razmerja (Rim I) (UL L 177, 4.7.2008, str.
Under specific circumstances, the service recipient in the latter Member State may moreover be held jointly liable. 
V posebnih okoliščinah je lahko poleg tega solidarno odgovoren tudi prejemnik storitev v tej drugi državi.
The Danish Parliament also argues that the proposal raises doubts on the competence of the Member States to determine the terms and conditions that apply to temporary agency workers. 
Danski parlament trdi tudi, da predlog sproža dvome o pristojnosti držav članic, da določijo pogoje, ki se uporabljajo za začasne agencijske delavce.
the existing rules are sufficient and adequate (point 4.2.1.) 
obstoječa pravila so zadostna in primerna (točka 4.2.1);
20 years after its adoption, the Commission found that Directive 96/71/EC no longer ensures such conditions against the background of the current economic and social conditions in the Member States. 
20 let po sprejetju Direktive 96/71/ES je Komisija ugotovila, da ta glede na trenutne gospodarske in socialne razmere ne zagotavlja več takšnih pogojev.
In the same judgment, the Court accepted an implicit and rather limited reasoning as sufficient to justify compliance with the principle of subsidiarity. 
Sodišče je v isti sodbi implicitno in razmeroma omejeno obrazložitev označilo kot zadostno za utemeljitev skladnosti z načelom subsidiarnosti.
Several national Parliaments argue that the rules currently in place are adequate at least whenever the current Directive gives Member States the possibility to go beyond the general rules (extension of collective agreements beyond the construction sector, temporary agency workers). 
Več nacionalnih parlamentov meni, da so trenutno veljavna pravila ustrezna, in sicer vsaj v primerih, ko veljavna direktiva državam članicam daje možnost, da presežejo splošna pravila (razširitev kolektivnih pogodb tudi izven gradbenega sektorja, začasni agencijski delavci).