natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
While it is for each Member State to lay down conditions for the acquisition and loss of nationality, with due regard to Union law, granting the nationality of a Member State also entails granting EU citizenship and the rights that go with it, which can be exercised throughout the Union. 
Čeprav je za določitev pogojev za pridobitev in izgubo državljanstva pristojna posamezna država članica ob ustreznem upoštevanju prava Unije, se ob podelitvi državljanstva države članice podelijo tudi državljanstvo Unije in z njim povezane pravice, ki se nato lahko uveljavljajo po vsej Uniji.
It requires Member States to ensure that one or more bodies at national level is responsible for advising and providing support and assistance to EU migrant workers, including jobseekers, with the enforcement of their rights. 
V skladu s to direktivo morajo države članice zagotoviti, da je en ali več organov na nacionalni ravni odgovornih za svetovanje delavcem migrantom EU, med drugim tudi iskalcem zaposlitve, ter zagotavljanje podpore in pomoči pri uveljavljanju njihovih pravic.
In Kaltoft the Court refused to accept that EU law could be interpreted as laying down a general principle of non-discrimination on grounds of obesity in employment and occupation. 
V zadevi Kaltoft Sodišče ni sprejelo trditve, da bi se lahko pravo EU razlagalo tako, da določa splošno načelo prepovedi diskriminacije zaradi debelosti pri zaposlovanju in delu.
In November 2013 the Commission adopted a Communication on Free movement of EU citizens and their families: five actions to make a difference, which explains the rights and obligations attached to free movement, sets out the conditions and limitations under EU law and addresses concerns raised by some Member States. 
Komisija je novembra 2013 sprejela sporočilo z naslovom Prosto gibanje državljanov EU in njihovih družinskih članov: pet konkretnih ukrepov, v katerem so pojasnjene pravice in obveznosti, povezane s prostim gibanjem, določeni pogoji in omejitve v skladu s pravom EU in obravnavani pomisleki nekaterih držav članic.
In three rulings the Court interpreted the Employment Equality Directive as applied to the prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation and the notion of disability. 
Sodišče je v treh sodbah direktivo o enakosti pri zaposlovanju razlagalo tako, da se uporablja za prepoved diskriminacije na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti in invalidnosti.
[15: The last report (COM(2016) 424 final of 27/6/2016) provides, for the first time, an overview of the measures put in place by Member States following the 2013 Council Recommendation on effective Roma integration measures in the Member States of 9 December 2013.] 
[15: V zadnje poročilo (COM(2016) 424 final z dne 27. junija 2016) je bil prvič vključen pregled ukrepov, ki so jih države članice vzpostavile v skladu s Priporočilom Sveta z dne 9. decembra 2013 o učinkovitih ukrepih za vključevanje Romov v državah članicah.]
In Accept the Court considered that a ‘patron' of a football club's public statement that he would never hire a homosexual player could establish a prima facie presumption of discrimination based on sexual orientation. 
V zadevi Accept je Sodišče menilo, da bi bila lahko javna izjava „patrona" nogometnega kluba, da nikoli ne bi zaposlil homoseksualnega nogometaša, domneva prima facie diskriminacije na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti.
This online process has reduced the number of petitions by half by introducing filter questions to pre-screen petitions for admissibility. 
S tem spletnim postopkom se je število peticij prepolovilo, saj so bila uvedena vprašanja, ki delujejo kot filter in s katerimi se vnaprej preveri dopustnost peticij.
This report reviews the provisions in Part II TFEU regarding Union citizenship, non-discrimination, free movement and residence in the territory of the Member States, the right to vote and stand as a candidate at municipal and European Parliament elections in the Member State of residence, the right to consular protection, the right to petition the European Parliament and the right to take complaints to the Ombudsman. 
To poročilo vsebuje pregled določb iz drugega dela PDEU o državljanstvu Unije, nediskriminaciji, prostem gibanju in prebivanju na ozemlju držav članic, pravici voliti in biti voljen na občinskih volitvah in volitvah v Evropski parlament v državi članici prebivališča, pravici do konzularne zaščite, pravici naslavljanja peticij na Evropski parlament in pravici do predložitve pritožb evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic.
[36: Case C-456/12 O and B.][37: Articles 7 or 16 of the Free Movement Directive.] 
[36: Zadeva C-456/12, O in B.][37: Člen 7 ali 16 direktive o prostem gibanju.]
The Commission continued its work to uphold EU citizens' rights to non-discrimination and to dismantle obstacles to free movement in cases relating to the recognition, in one Member State, of personal names attributed or changed under the law of another Member State. 
Komisija je nadaljevala svoje delo v zvezi z zagotavljanjem spoštovanja pravic državljanov Unije do nediskriminacije in odpravo ovir za prosto gibanje v primerih, povezanih s priznavanjem osebnih imen, pripisanih ali spremenjenih v eni državi članici, v drugi državi članici.
In particular, it has further clarified how the right to free movement applies to certain cases involving economically inactive EU citizens, EU citizens looking for a job and third country family members of EU citizens. 
Predvsem je dodatno pojasnilo, kako se pravica do prostega gibanja uporablja v nekaterih primerih, ki vključujejo ekonomsko neaktivne državljane Unije, državljane Unije, ki iščejo zaposlitev, in državljane tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije.
In parallel, the Commission continued its work with Member State experts in its group of experts on electoral rights to ensure the smooth conduct of the 2014 European Parliament elections, in particular by exchanging data and developing IT tools to prevent the double voting of EU citizens in these elections. 
Obenem je Komisija še naprej sodelovala s strokovnjaki držav članic v strokovni skupini za volilne pravice, da bi zagotovila neovirano izvajanje volitev v Evropski parlament leta 2014, zlasti z izmenjavo podatkov in razvojem orodij IT, s čimer bi se preprečilo, da bi državljani Unije na teh volitvah dvakrat volili.
The Commission followed it up by proposing, on 30 June 2016, changes to the Brussels IIa Regulation to improve the EU rules that protect children in the context of cross-border parental responsibility disputes related to custody, access rights and child abduction. 
Komisija je po oceni 30. junija 2016 predlagala spremembe Uredbe Bruselj IIa, s katerimi bi se izboljšala pravila EU, ki varujejo otroke v čezmejnih sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo, povezanih s pravico do varstva in vzgoje, pravico do stikov in odvzemom otroka.
In Alimanovic the Court held that jobseekers from another Member State who worked in another Member State for less than a year and then looked unsuccessfully for work for the following six months, would retain their worker status for no less than six months - during which, they benefit from equal treatment and entitlement to social assistance benefits. 
Sodišče je v zadevi Alimanovic menilo, da bi morali iskalci zaposlitve iz druge države članice, ki so v drugi državi članici delali manj kot leto in nato naslednjih šest mesecev neuspešno iskali zaposlitev, ohraniti svoj status delavca najmanj šest mesecev, med tem časom pa bi se morali enako obravnavati in imeti pravico do dajatev socialne pomoči.
In 2014 Belgium adopted a new law amending its Civil Code in response to points raised by the Commission. 
Belgija je leta 2014 v odziv na težave, ki jih je izpostavila Komisija, sprejela nov zakon, s katerim je spremenila svoj civilni zakonik.
[4: See also Article 21(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. 
[4: Glej tudi člen 21(2) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Under Article 24(3) TFEU, EU citizens have a right to address the European Ombudsman, which deals with citizens' complaints about the EU institutions, bodies and agencies. 
V skladu s členom 24(3) PDEU imajo državljani Unije pravico, da se obrnejo na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, ki obravnava pritožbe državljanov o institucijah, organih in agencijah EU.
The proposed revisions are expected to reduce costs, result in more efficient proceedings subject to clearer rules. 
S predlaganimi spremembami naj bi se zmanjšali stroški in povečala učinkovitost postopkov, pravila zanje pa bi bila jasnejša.
To ensure that non-national EU citizens can found or become members of political parties in the host Member State, the Commission continued its infringement proceedings against seven Member States which did not allow this. 
Za zagotovitev, da lahko državljani Unije, ki prebivajo v državi, ki ni država, katere državljanstvo imajo, ustanovijo politične stranke v državi članici gostiteljici ali postanejo njihovi člani, je Komisija nadaljevala postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev proti sedmim državam članicam, v katerih to ni bilo dovoljeno.
In 2015 the Council adopted a Directive to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented EU citizens abroad which establishes clear and legally binding rules on cooperation and coordination between Member States' consular authorities to ensure that unrepresented EU citizens in third countries can benefit from non-discriminatory consular protection from other Member States. 
Svet je leta 2015 sprejel direktivo za lažje zagotavljanje konzularne zaščite državljanom Unije brez predstavništva v tujini, v kateri so določena jasna in pravno zavezujoča pravila o sodelovanju in usklajevanju med konzularnimi organi držav članic, da lahko državljani Unije brez predstavništva v tretjih državah izkoristijo nediskriminatorno konzularno zaščito drugih držav članic.
The Commission also continued its work with Member State experts in its group of experts on the right to free movement of persons, to identify difficulties and clarify issues of interpretation of EU law on free movement of EU citizens, as well as to share information on abuse and fraud and exchange best practices. 
Komisija je še naprej sodelovala s strokovnjaki držav članic v strokovni skupini za pravico do prostega gibanja oseb, da bi odkrila težave in pojasnila vprašanja v zvezi z razlago prava EU o prostem gibanju državljanov Unije ter si izmenjala informacije o zlorabi in goljufijah ter dobre prakse.
In 2014 the Commission adopted a Communication, Helping national authorities fight abuses of the right to free movement, and a Handbook on addressing the issue of alleged marriages of convenience between EU citizens and non-EU nationals in the context of EU law on free movement of EU citizens, the main purpose of which was to help national authorities to combat potential abuse of the right to free movement. 
Komisija je leta 2014 sprejela sporočilo z naslovom Pomagati nacionalnim organom v boju proti zlorabam pravice do prostega gibanja: Priročnik o reševanju problematike domnevnih navideznih sklenitev zakonske zveze med državljani EU in državljani tretjih držav v okviru prava EU o prostem gibanju državljanov EU, katerega glavni namen je pomagati nacionalnim organom v boju proti morebitnim zlorabam pravice do prostega gibanja.
In the reporting period, the Commission replied to four complaints, ten letters/individual queries and three questions from the European Parliament on this issue. 
V obdobju poročanja je Komisija odgovorila na štiri pritožbe, deset dopisov/individualnih poizvedb in tri vprašanja Evropskega parlamenta o teh zadevah.
[44: Evaluation of EU rules on free movement of EU citizens and their family members and their practical implementation (October 2013) http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/document/files/evaluation_of_eu_rules_on_free_movement-final_report.pdf Evaluation of the impact of the free movement of EU citizens at local level (January 2014) http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/files/dg_just_eva_free_mov_final_report_27.01.14.pdf ][45: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/events/intra-eu-mobility-2014/ ] 
[44: Evaluation of EU rules on free movement of EU citizens and their family members and their practical implementation (Ocena pravil EU o prostem gibanju državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov ter njihovo praktično izvajanje, oktober 2013), dostopna na http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/document/files/evaluation_of_eu_rules_on_free_movement-final_report.pdf, in Evaluation of the impact of the free movement of EU citizens at local level (Ocena učinka prostega gibanja državljanov EU na lokalni ravni, januar 2014), dostopna na http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/files/dg_just_eva_free_mov_final_report_27.01.14.pdf.
Citizens living in these 16 Member States can choose that the law applicable to their divorce or legal separation should be the law of the country where they habitually reside or where they last habitually resided, or the country of nationality of either spouse or of the country where divorce or legal separation proceedings are being handled. 
Državljani, ki prebivajo v teh 16 državah članicah, lahko izberejo, da se za njihovo razvezo zakonske zveze ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti uporablja pravo države, v kateri imajo običajno prebivališče ali v kateri so imeli zadnje običajno prebivališče, ali države, katere državljanstvo ima zakonec, ali države, v kateri poteka razvezni postopek ali postopek za prenehanje življenjske skupnosti.
Citizenship of the Union (Article 20(1) TFEU) 
Državljanstvo Unije (člen 20(1) PDEU)
[40: Case C-438/14 Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff. ] 
[40: Zadeva C-438/14, Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff.]
The Regulation determines the Member State responsible for dealing with the succession, the applicable national law, enforcement and proof across the European Union through the European Certificate of Succession. 
Uredba določa, katera država članica je odgovorna za obravnavo dedovanja, veljavno nacionalno pravo, izvrševanje in dokazovanje v Evropski uniji z evropskim potrdilom o dedovanju.
Several bilateral agreements were negotiated between the EU and third countries containing consular consent clauses to give full effect to the right of unrepresented EU citizens to non-discriminatory consular protection. 
Po pogajanjih je bilo sprejetih več dvostranskih sporazumov med EU in tretjimi državami, ki vsebujejo klavzule o soglašanju s konzularno zaščito, da se v celoti zagotovi izvrševanje pravice državljanov Unije brez predstavništva do nediskriminatorne konzularne zaščite.
[84: Inter alia with Afghanistan, Australia, Canada, Cuba and New Zealand. ] 
[84: Med drugim z Afganistanom, Avstralijo, Kanado, Kubo in Novo Zelandijo.]
[19: Case C-135/08 Rottmann. ] 
[19: Zadeva C-135/08, Rottmann.]
The Commission replied to 32 complaints, 71 letters/individual queries, 58 questions and 13 petitions from the European Parliament on these issues, primarily relating to ‘disenfranchisement' and to the electoral rights of disabled persons. 
Komisija je odgovorila na 32 pritožb, 71 dopisov/individualnih poizvedb, 58 vprašanj in 13 peticij Evropskega parlamenta o teh vprašanjih, ki so se večinoma nanašala na „odvzem volilne pravice" in na volilne pravice invalidov.
Case-law developments 
Razvoj sodne prakse
The Commission also published an updated Practice Guide for citizens and legal practitioners on the application of this Regulation, which determines what Member State courts should deal with a divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment and with matters of parental responsibility such as custody, access rights and child abduction, in cross-border circumstances. 
Komisija je objavila tudi posodobljeni praktični vodnik za državljane in delavce v pravni stroki o uporabi te uredbe, v katerem je določeno, katera sodišča držav članic bi morala v čezmejnih primerih obravnavati razvezo zakonske zveze, prenehanje življenjske skupnosti ali razveljavitev zakonske zveze in spore v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo, povezane na primer s pravico do varstva in vzgoje, pravico do stikov in odvzemom otroka.
[27: Case C-140/12 Brey. 
[27: Zadeva C-140/12, Brey.
In Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff the Court found that the refusal by the German authorities to recognise freely chosen forenames and surname legally acquired in the UK by a dual German-UK national but which include several tokens of nobility, constitutes a restriction on the freedom to move and reside across the EU. 
Sodišče je v zadevi Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff, v kateri nemški organi niso želeli priznati imena in priimka državljana z dvojnim nemškim in britanskim državljanstvom, ki si ju je sam izbral in pravno pridobil v Združenem kraljestvu ter ki vsebujeta več plemiških nazivov, razsodilo, da je to omejitev prostega gibanja in prebivanja znotraj EU.
][56: Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, Austria, Portugal, Romania and Slovenia. 
][56: Belgija, Bolgarija, Nemčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Latvija, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Malta, Avstrija, Portugalska, Romunija in Slovenija.
In January 2014 the Commission adopted a Recommendation on addressing the consequences of disenfranchisement of Union citizens exercising their rights to free movement. 
Komisija je januarja 2014 sprejela priporočilo z naslovom Obravnavanje posledic izgube volilne pravice državljanov Unije, ki uresničujejo svojo pravico do prostega gibanja.
Articles 20(2)(d) and 24(2), (3) and (4) TFEU refer to other rights entitling EU citizens to address the EU institutions, including the right to petition the European Parliament and the right to address the European Ombudsman. 
Člen 20(2)(d) ter člen 24(2), (3) in (4) PDEU se nanašata na druge pravice, v skladu s katerimi se lahko državljani Unije obrnejo na institucije EU, vključno s pravico, da na Evropski parlament naslovijo peticijo, in pravico, da se obrnejo na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
Making the exercise of free movement rights more effective for workers 
Povečevanje učinkovitosti uveljavljanja pravic do prostega gibanja delavcev
Under Article 24(2) TFEU, EU citizens have the right to petition the European Parliament, in any Treaty language, on Union matters that affect them and to obtain a reply in the same language. 
V skladu s členom 24(2) PDEU imajo državljani Unije pravico, da na Evropski parlament v katerem koli jeziku iz Pogodbe naslovijo peticijo o vprašanjih Unije, ki jih zadevajo, in prejmejo odgovor v istem jeziku.
][81: Czech Republic, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.] 
][81: Češka, Latvija, Litva in Poljska.]
It ruled that in the case in question the withholding of civic rights was proportionate, considering the seriousness of the person's crime and the fact that French law allows citizens to apply for reinstatement of their voting rights, and thus permitted. 
V zadevni zadevi je razsodilo, da je bil odvzem državljanske pravice sorazmerno dejanje zaradi resnosti kaznivega dejanja in dejstva, da lahko v skladu s francoskim pravom državljani zaprosijo za ponovno podelitev volilnih pravic, zato je bil v tem primeru odvzem dovoljen.
5.2.1 Access to benefits and/or social assistance by economically inactive EU citizens 
5.2.1 Dostop ekonomsko neaktivnih državljanov Unije do socialnih prejemkov in/ali socialne pomoči
Many concerned the right of entry and residence of non-EU family members of EU citizens (conditions for issuing visas and residence cards, additional formalities) and the conditions under which EU citizens can exercise their right to free movement. 
Mnogi so se nanašali na pravico do vstopa in prebivanja državljanov tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije (na pogoje za izdajo vizumov in dovoljenj za prebivanje ter druge formalnosti), ter pogoje, pod katerimi lahko državljani Unije uveljavljajo pravico do prostega gibanja.
5.2.5 Residence of former family members of EU citizens 
5.2.5 Prebivanje nekdanjih družinskih članov državljanov Unije
In Delvigne the Court was asked to examine whether it was contrary to European law for a French citizen who had been convicted of a serious crime to be permanently deprived of his right to vote in European elections. 
Sodišče je moralo v zadevi Delvigne proučiti, ali je v nasprotju s pravom EU, da se francoskemu državljanu, obsojenemu zaradi hudega kaznivega dejanja, trajno odvzame pravica, da voli na volitvah v Evropski parlament.
[6: Case C-322/13 Grauel Rüffer. 
[6: Zadeva C-322/13, Grauel Rüffer.
Article 20 TFEU provides that any person who holds the nationality of an EU country is also a citizen of the Union. 
V skladu s členom 20 PDEU so vse osebe z državljanstvom ene od držav članic EU tudi državljani Unije.
Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality (Article 18 TFEU) 
Prepoved diskriminacije glede na državljanstvo (člen 18 PDEU)
The Court further clarified the conditions under which non-EU family members of EU citizens may enjoy a derived right of residence in the citizens' Member States of nationality when the citizens return with their family member after having genuinely and effectively exercised their right to free movement. 
Sodišče je dodatno pojasnilo pogoje, v skladu s katerimi lahko državljani tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije, uveljavljajo izvedeno pravico do prebivanja v državah članicah, katerih državljanstvo imajo državljani Unije, ko se državljani vrnejo z družinskim članom, potem ko so resnično in učinkovito uveljavljali pravico do prostega gibanja.
[29: Case C-333/13 Dano, see paragraphs 78-79.] 
[29: Zadeva C-333/13, Dano, glej točki 78 in 79.]
[35: Case C-457/12 S and G.] 
[35: Zadeva C-457/12, S in G.]
Against this background, the Commission looked into national ‘investor schemes' granting citizenship rights to non-EU nationals in return for investment. 
Zato je Komisija proučila nacionalne „sheme za vlagatelje", s katerimi se državljanske pravice podelijo državljanom tretjih držav v zameno za naložbe.
In Dano the Court reviewed the case of an economically inactive EU citizen who did not fulfil the conditions set out in the Free Movement Directive (having sufficient resources) to claim a right of residence upon arriving in the territory of the host Member State. 
Sodišče je v zadevi Dano pregledalo primer ekonomsko neaktivnega državljana Unije, ki ni izpolnjeval pogojev iz direktive o prostem gibanju (o zadostnih sredstvih), da bi lahko uveljavljal pravico do prebivanja ob prihodu na ozemlje države članice gostiteljice.
[33: Case C-202/13 McCarthy. 
[33: Zadeva C-202/13, McCarthy.
In the reporting period, the Commission dealt with 613 complaints from citizens, 309 letters/individual queries, 75 questions and 46 petitions from the European Parliament on the exercise of the right to free movement. 
V obdobju poročanja je Komisija obravnavala 613 pritožb državljanov, 309 dopisov/individualnih poizvedb, 75 vprašanj in 46 peticij Evropskega parlamenta o uveljavljanju pravice do prostega gibanja.
[7: See also Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.] 
[7: Glej tudi člen 21(1) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.]
[71: Case C-650/13 Delvigne. 
[71: Zadeva C-650/13, Delvigne.
The Court clarified specific aspects of the right of residence of non-EU nationals who are family members of Union citizens in the host Member State. 
Sodišče je pojasnilo posebne vidike pravice državljanov tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije, do prebivanja v državi članici gostiteljici.
][23: 71% of respondents to the Flash Eurobarometer 430 on EU citizenship, October 2015. ] 
][23: Mnenje 71 % vprašanih na raziskavo Flash Eurobarometer 430 o državljanstvu EU, oktober 2015.]
In Singh an EU citizen left the host Member State before commencing divorce proceedings, while the non-EU national spouse stayed behind. 
V zadevi Singh je državljanka Unije zapustila državo članico gostiteljico pred začetkom razveznega postopka, zakonec, ki je bil državljan tretje države, pa je ostal v državi članici gostiteljici.
][49: Belgium, Germany, Poland, Sweden and the UK.] 
][49: Belgija, Nemčija, Poljska, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo.]