natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Antimicrobial resistance: the European Parliament adopted several amendments on antimicrobial resistance. 
Protimikrobna odpornost: Evropski parlament je sprejel več sprememb v zvezi s protimikrobno odpornostjo.
Nonetheless, the European Parliament wanted to obtain re-assurances that equal level of controls would be kept in the future for bovine animals which is reflected in a new recital. 
Kljub temu je Evropski parlament želel ponovna zagotovila, da bodo v prihodnosti ohranjene enake ravni nadzora za govedo, kar se odraža v novi uvodni izjavi.
Some small issues were accepted by the Commission in part, but were not specifically included in the final Council position as in the course of the negotiations they had become redundant or were already explained elsewhere or implicitly included in the proposal (for example amendments 4, 8, 26, 45, 156, 222 and 277). 
Nekaj manjših vprašanj je Komisija delno sprejela, a niso bila izrecno vključena v končno stališče Sveta, saj so med pogajanji postala nepotrebna ali so bila razložena že drugje ali posredno vključena v predlog (na primer spremembe 4, 8, 26, 45, 156, 222 in 277).
TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 
EVROPSKEMU PARLAMENTU
The Commission supports the Council's position as strategic measures for non-listed diseases are a matter of subsidiarity. 
Komisija podpira stališče Sveta, ker so strateški ukrepi za bolezni, ki jih ni na seznamu, vprašanje subsidiarnosti.
Defining those animals as a separate category could cause confusion, legal uncertainty and potentially restrict the measures that can be taken with respect to them. 
Opredelitev navedenih živali v ločenih kategorijah bi lahko povzročila zmedo, pravno negotovost in potencialno omejila ukrepe, ki se lahko sprejmejo v zvezi z njimi.
The Union has a well-developed acquis regarding animal welfare covering different species (broilers, laying hens, pigs, calves) or activities (farming, transport, slaughter, research, etc.). 
Unija ima dobro razvit pravni red glede dobrobiti živali, ki zajema različne vrste (brojlerje, kokoši nesnice, prašiče, teleta) ali dejavnosti (kmetovanje, prevoz, zakol, raziskave itd.).
The Parliament recognised the value of these additional essential elements providing more detailed criteria for disease listing and categorisation. 
Parlament je priznal vrednost teh dodatnih bistvenih elementov, ki določajo podrobnejša merila za uvrščanje bolezni na seznam in njihovo razvrščanje.
The European Parliament also insisted on the adjustment of Article 9 (amendment 94) setting up a responsibility of operators for a responsible use of veterinary medicines as in their view such a clear obligation was needed in the EU legislation to establish a link with the proposal on veterinary medicines (COM(2014) 558, 2014/0257 (COD)). 
Evropski parlament je vztrajal tudi pri prilagoditvi člena 9 (sprememba 94), s katero bi se vzpostavila odgovornost izvajalcev dejavnosti za odgovorno uporabo zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini, saj meni, da je bila taka jasna obveza v zakonodaji EU potrebna za povezavo s predlogom o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini (COM(2014) 558, 2014/0257 (COD)).
Contrary to Article 290 (2) TFEU, some of those amendments set out a legally binding obligation for the Commission to conduct these consultations. 
Nekatere izmed navedenih sprememb v nasprotju s členom 290(2) PDEU Komisiji nalagajo pravno zavezujoče obveznosti, da izvede ta posvetovanja.
On emerging diseases, the European Parliament in its amendments 176 and 177 requested to take more and clearer measures. 
V zvezi s porajajočimi se boleznimi je Evropski parlament v svojih spremembah 176 in 177 zahteval sprejetje večjega števila jasnejših ukrepov.
The Council did not incorporate the European Parliament's amendment as this provision goes beyond the scope of the proposal and would create unjustified administrative and financial burden for Member States. 
Svet sprememb Evropskega parlamenta ni vključil, saj ta določba presega področje uporabe predloga in bi povzročila neutemeljeno upravno in finančno breme za države članice.
The Commission was initially not in favour of this additional reporting duty as there are other tools, such as fitness checks and evaluations, to judge the impact of EU legislation. 
Komisija prvotno ni podpirala te dodatne obveznosti poročanja, saj za ocenjevanje učinka zakonodaje EU obstajajo druga orodja, kot so preverjanja ustreznosti in ocene.
position of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on transmissible animal diseases (Animal Health Law) 
stališčem Sveta v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prenosljivih živalskih boleznih (pravila o zdravju živali)
Although on certain elements the common position differs from the Commission's original proposal, the Commission considers that it represents a carefully balanced compromise and is satisfied that it covers all issues considered essential by the Commission when adopting its proposal. 
Čeprav se skupno stališče v nekaterih elementih razlikuje od prvotnega predloga Komisije, Komisija meni, da to predstavlja skrbno uravnotežen kompromis, in je zadovoljna, da zajema vsa vprašanja, ki jih je štela za bistvena ob sprejemanju predloga.
The Council proposed amendments which clarify the ‘additional guarantees', and enable the Member States to take their own disease prevention and control measures. 
Svet je predlagal spremembe, ki pojasnjujejo „dodatna jamstva" in državam članicam omogočajo, da sprejmejo lastne ukrepe za preprečevanje in nadzor bolezni.
Review clause (report by the Commission): amendment 330 of the European Parliament asked, in an Article, the Commission to submit a report on the impact of the Regulation by 31 December 2019. 
Klavzula o pregledu (poročilo Komisije): Sprememba 330 Evropskega parlamenta je v obliki člena zahtevala, da Komisija do 31. decembra 2019 predloži poročilo o učinku Uredbe.
Transitional periods: the Council expressed concerns about the amount of legislation that would be repealed and replaced by this new animal health framework. 
Prehodno obdobje: Svet je izrazil pomisleke glede obsega zakonodaje, ki bi jo ta novi okvir o zdravju živali razveljavil in nadomestil.
Finally, the legal framework needs to be flexible yet robust enough for an effective Union response in the event of important climate changes, as well as new and unknown emerging risks, and to allow for quick adjustment to scientific developments and new international standards. 
Pravni okvir mora biti prožen, a hkrati dovolj trden za učinkovit odziv Unije v primeru znatnih podnebnih sprememb, pa tudi novih in neznanih porajajočih se tveganj, in da bi omogočil hitro prilagajanje znanstvenemu napredku in novim mednarodnim standardom.
Following the adoption of the European Parliament's first reading position, informal discussions continued between the European Parliament, the Council Presidency and the Commission, with a view to concluding an agreement at the common position stage ('early second reading agreement'). 
Po sprejetju stališča Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave so se nadaljevale neformalne razprave med Evropskim parlamentom, predsedstvom Sveta in Komisijo z namenom sklenitve sporazuma v fazi skupnega stališča („hitri dogovor v drugi obravnavi").
These additions are acceptable for the Commission as they ensure that the existing rights are automatically carried over to the new legal framework thereby helping to avoid unnecessary administrative burden and costs for the operators and competent authorities and providing legal certainty in the transitional period. 
Ti dodatki so za Komisijo sprejemljivi, saj zagotavljajo, da se obstoječe pravice samodejno prenesejo v novi pravni okvir, s tem pa se prispeva k izogibanju nepotrebnemu upravnemu bremenu in stroškom za izvajalce dejavnosti in pristojne organe ter se v prehodnem obdobju zagotavlja pravna varnost.
This enhanced system will give operators working in the food chain, such as farmers and veterinarians, the capability to react quickly and to limit the spread of a disease and minimise its impact on animals and consumers. 
Ta okrepljeni sistem bo izvajalcem dejavnosti v prehranski verigi, kot so kmetje in veterinarji, omogočil, da se hitro odzovejo in omejijo širjenje bolezni ter čim bolj zmanjšajo njen učinek na živali in potrošnike.
Identification and registration of dogs: the European Parliament required, in amendment 236, all Member States to set up a compulsory registration of all dogs and, when appropriate, set up a database. 
Identifikacija in registracija psov: Evropski parlament je v spremembi 236 zahteval, naj vse države članice uvedejo obvezno registracijo vseh psov in po potrebi vzpostavijo zbirko podatkov.
The Commission undertakes to publish a regular report as regards the use of antimicrobial medicinal products in animals in the EU on the basis of data made available by the Member States. 
Komisija se zavezuje, da bo objavljala redna poročila o uporabi protimikrobnih zdravil pri živalih v EU na podlagi podatkov, ki jih bodo dale na voljo države članice.
* Taking into account the developments in the informal discussions between the Council and the European Parliament following the European Parliament's first reading, the Commission did not prepare an amended proposal but expressed its views on the Parliament's amendments in the "Communication de la Commission sur les suites données aux avis et résolutions adoptés par le Parlement européen lors des sessions d'avril I et II 2014" (document SP(2014) 471 of 9 July 2014). 
* Ob upoštevanju razvoja dogodkov v okviru neformalnih razprav med Svetom in Evropskim parlamentom po prvi obravnavi v Evropskem parlamentu Komisija ni pripravila spremenjenega predloga, temveč je svoje stališče o spremembah s strani Parlamenta izrazila v dokumentu „Communication de la Commission sur les suites données aux avis et résolutions adoptés par le Parlement européen lors des sessions d'avril I et II 2014" (sporočilo Komisije o ukrepih, sprejetih na podlagi mnenj in resolucij, ki jih je Evropski parlament sprejel na prvem in drugem zasedanju aprila 2014) (dokument SP(2014) 471 z dne 9. julija 2014).
The Commission's proposal already required that animal welfare is systematically taken into account when considering the impacts of diseases and measures to combat diseases. 
Predlog Komisije je že zahteval, da se dobrobit živali sistematično upošteva pri obravnavi učinkov bolezni in ukrepov za boj proti njim.
The Commission's proposal provided for a legal basis for the possible future introduction of identification and registration requirements of different animal species, possibly including dogs. 
Predlog Komisije je zagotovil pravno podlago za morebitno prihodnjo uvedbo zahtev za identifikacijo in registracijo različnih živalski vrst, vključno morebiti psov.
Date of the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee: 10 December 2013. 
Datum mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora: 10. december 2013.
Antimicrobial resistance was already covered in the Commission's proposal through provisions on the resistance to treatments and on the disease profile. 
Protimikrobna odpornost je bila v predlogu Komisije že zajeta v določbah o odpornosti na zdravljenje in o profilu bolezni.
Objective of the proposal from the Commission 
Cilj predloga Komisije
The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - Action plan against the rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance - emphasises the preventive role of the Regulation on transmissible animal diseases ("Animal Health Law") and the consequent expected reduction of the use of antibiotics in animals. 
Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu - Akcijski načrt proti naraščajoči nevarnosti protimikrobne odpornosti - poudarja preventivno vlogo uredbe o prenosljivih živalskih boleznih („zakonodaja o zdravju živali") in posledično pričakovano zmanjšanje uporabe antibiotikov pri živalih.
The Council shared the concerns of the European Parliament about the clarity of measures for emerging diseases and proposed a new Article. 
Svet se je strinjal s pomisleki Evropskega parlamenta glede jasnosti ukrepov v zvezi s porajajočimi se boleznimi in predlagal nov člen.
The proposal aims to improve standards and to provide a common system to better detect and control diseases, as well as to tackle health, food and feed safety risks in a coordinated way. 
Namen predloga je izboljšati standarde in zagotoviti skupen sistem za boljše odkrivanje in nadzor bolezni ter usklajeno obravnavo tveganj v zvezi z zdravjem in varnostjo hrane ter krme.
The Commission considers that the common position adopted by the Council with qualified majority reflects the original goals of the Commission's proposal and takes into account many concerns of the European Parliament. 
Komisija meni, da skupno stališče, ki ga je Svet sprejel s kvalificirano večino, odraža prvotne cilje predloga Komisije in upošteva mnoge pomisleke Evropskega parlamenta.
This went further than the current system of ‘additional guarantees', retained in the Commission proposal, whereby the Commission approves for a limited number of diseases the additional guarantees for intra-Union trade requested by a Member State, which has decided to eradicate on an optional basis one or more of those diseases. 
To presega sedanji sistem „dodatnih jamstev", ohranjenih v predlogu Komisije, v skladu s katerim Komisija za omejeno število bolezni na zahtevo države članice, ki se je neobvezno odločila izkoreniniti eno ali več izmed navedenih bolezni, odobri dodatna jamstva za trgovino znotraj Unije.
The Council's position is a good compromise towards the European Parliament's position and the Commission can therefore support it. 
Stališče Sveta je dober kompromis s stališčem Evropskega parlamenta in zato ga Komisija lahko podpre.
Both the Council and the European Parliament had reservations about repealing the Pet Regulation so soon after its adoption. 
Tako Svet kot Evropski parlament sta imela pomisleke glede razveljavitve uredbe o hišnih živalih tako zgodaj po njenem sprejetju.
The Commission considers the Council's position a suitable compromise as it meets to some extent the European Parliament's concerns while preserving the principles of the Single Market. 
Komisija meni, da je stališče Sveta ustrezen kompromis, saj v določeni meri obravnava pomisleke Evropskega parlamenta, hkrati pa ohranja načela enotnega trga.
Furthermore, the proposal introduces the categorisation, prioritisation and listing of diseases which require intervention at Union level, enabling a more risk based approach and appropriate use of resources. 
Predlog uvaja tudi razvrščanje, določanje prednostnega vrstnega reda in uvrščanje na seznam bolezni, ki zahtevajo ukrepanje na ravni Unije, kar bo omogočilo pristop, ki bo bolj temeljil na tveganjih, ter ustrezno rabo virov.
Title of the proposal: the European Parliament suggested a new title for the proposal to better describing its focus on transmissible animal diseases. 
Naslov predloga: Evropski parlament je predlagal nov naslov predloga, ki bi bolje opisal osredotočenost predloga na prenosljive živalske bolezni.
This issue was also discussed in the Council which suggested a change to the proposal to reflect it. 
O tem vprašanju je razpravljal tudi Svet, ki je predlagal spremembo predloga, ki bi to odražala.
The Commission supports this position. 
Komisija to stališče podpira.
It was the Commission's intention to retain the spirit and details of that legislation and to provide stability for Member States and for operators while at the same enabling more flexibility for the adoption of new technologies, adaptation to new challenges and the provision of derogations in low risk situations. 
Namen Komisije je bil, da bi ohranila duh in podrobnosti navedene zakonodaje in državam članicam ter izvajalcem dejavnosti zagotovila stabilnost, hkrati pa omogočila več fleksibilnosti pri prevzemanju novih tehnologij in prilagajanju novim izzivom ter omogočila odstopanja v razmerah z nizkim tveganjem.
Amendments obliging actors to consider or raise awareness on the risks of antimicrobial resistance are acceptable (Amendments 73, 101), while amendments interfering with the legislation on veterinary medicines cannot be supported as they go beyond the scope of this proposal. 
Spremembe, ki akterje zavezujejo, naj upoštevajo tveganja protimikrobne odpornosti ali o njej ozaveščajo, so sprejemljive (spremembi 73 in 101), sprememb, ki posegajo v zakonodajo o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini, pa ni mogoče podpreti, saj presegajo področje uporabe tega predloga.
Date of the position of the European Parliament, first reading: 15 April 2014. 
Datum stališča Evropskega parlamenta, prva obravnava: 15. april 2014.
In particular, the European Parliament expressed its support for the principle that prevention is better than cure and welcomed the attempt to bring together the current dispersed animal health legislation into one single set of principles. 
Zlasti je izrazil podporo načelu, da je bolje preprečiti kot zdraviti, in pozdravil poskus združitve trenutno razpršene zakonodaje o zdravju živali v enoten sklop načel.
Sufficient flexibility is provided to adjust the animal health measures to different establishments and local circumstances, in particular with respect to requirements for the registration and approval of establishments and for the keeping of animals and products. 
Zagotovljena je zadostna prožnost za prilagajanje ukrepov za zdravje živali različnim obratom in lokalnim razmeram, zlasti glede zahtev za registracijo in odobritev obratov ter gojenje živali in hrambo proizvodov.
Animal health laboratories: the European Parliament envisaged (amendments 150-155) requirements for official animal health laboratories, including provisions on the laboratory network and requirements on the official laboratories as well as national and Union reference laboratories. 
Veterinarski laboratoriji: Evropski parlament je predvidel (spremembe 150-155) zahteve za uradne veterinarske laboratorije, vključno z določbami o omrežju laboratorijev in zahtevami za uradne laboratorije, pa tudi referenčne laboratorije na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Unije.
Comments on the position of the Council 
Pripombe k stališču Sveta
Transitional measures (recognition of acquired rights): the Council introduced new Articles providing the operators and Member States with the possibility to recognise rights as regards the approval or registration of existing operators and establishments, the approved disease free statuses, and the special provisions for salmonella. 
Prehodni ukrepi (priznavanje pridobljenih pravic): Svet je uvedel nove člene, ki izvajalcem dejavnosti in državam članicam zagotavljajo možnost priznavanja pravic v zvezi z odobritvijo ali registracijo obstoječih izvajalcev dejavnosti in obratov, odobren status brez bolezni in posebne določbe za salmonelo.
The proposal on animal health supports these crucial overarching objectives by reducing the risk of the negative economic, social and environmental impacts of poor animal health or animal disease outbreaks; and consequently by supporting the economic security and success of animal keepers, particularly farmers, and thus contributing to smart, inclusive and sustainable growth. 
Predlog o zdravju živali te ključne krovne cilje podpira z zmanjševanjem tveganja za negativne gospodarske, družbene in okoljske učinke slabega zdravja živali ali izbruhov živalskih bolezni ter posledično s spodbujanjem gospodarske varnosti in uspešnosti imetnikov živali, zlasti kmetov, s čimer prispeva k pametni, vključujoči in trajnostni rasti.
The Council supported the Commission's proposal since requiring all Member States to set up such a system, without a proper impact assessment, may be disproportionate to the animal health risk and could entail financial and administrative burden for an unidentified benefit. 
Svet je podprl predlog Komisije, saj bi bila lahko zahteva, naj vse države članice uvedejo tak sistem, brez ustrezne ocene učinka nesorazmerna s tveganjem za zdravje živali in bi lahko pomenila finančno in upravno breme za neopredeljeno korist.
Due to the absence of the Council's position at the time and in order not to prejudge the Commission's role in facilitating agreement between the co-legislators at a later stage, the Commission's position on the Parliament amendments remained rather conservative and tended towards defending the Commission's proposal. 
Ker takrat stališča Sveta ni bilo na voljo in da vloga Komisije pri poznejšem omogočanju sporazuma med sozakonodajalcema ne bi bila prejudicirana, je stališče Komisije o spremembah, ki jih je predlagal Parlament, ostalo bolj konzervativno in se nagibalo k zagovarjanju predloga Komisije.
Registration obligation of certain operators conducting assembly operations: the Council in its position added provisions concerning the registration obligation of certain operators without establishments conducting transactions with animals that may have an impact on traceability of those animals. 
Obveznost registracije določenih izvajalcev dejavnosti, ki izvajajo dejavnosti zbiranja: Svet je v svojem stališču dodal določbe v zvezi z obveznostjo registracije določenih izvajalcev dejavnosti brez obratov, ki izvajajo transakcije z živalmi, ki bi lahko vplivale na sledljivost navedenih živali.
The Council's position was that the non-commercial movement of pets logically fitted into the animal health framework, but that the Pet Regulation should not be re-opened so soon after its adoption. 
Stališče Sveta je bilo, da premiki hišnih živali v nekomercialne namene logično spadajo v okvir o zdravju živali, vendar da se razprava o uredbi o hišnih živalih ne bi smela ponovno odpreti tako kmalu po sprejetju uredbe.
The European Parliament proposed to list the diseases in an Annex to the Regulation, but to provide the Commission with delegated powers to amend or supplement that list (amendment 331). 
Evropski parlament je predlagal, da se seznam bolezni vključi v prilogo k Uredbi, Komisijo pa pooblasti za spreminjanje ali dopolnjevanje navedenega seznama (sprememba 331).
Animal Welfare: the European Parliament originally requested a number of amendments on animal welfare. 
Dobrobit živali: Evropski parlament je prvotno zahteval številne spremembe v zvezi z dobrobitjo živali.
The objective of the Commission proposal is to introduce a single piece of legislation to regulate animal health in the Union, based on the principle that "prevention is better than cure". 
Cilj predloga Komisije je uvesti enoten zakonodajni akt, ki bo urejal zdravje živali v Uniji, in sicer po načelu, da je bolje preprečiti kot zdraviti.
Date of adoption of the position of the Council: 14 December 2015. 
Datum sprejetja stališča Sveta: 14. december 2015.
The Council has, in its position, supported the Commission's proposal. 
Svet je v svojem stališču podprl predlog Komisije.
Animal welfare: the European Parliament required in its amendments 5, 99 and 202 that animal welfare is taken into account when considering or implementing animal health measures. 
Dobrobit živali: Evropski parlament je v svojih spremembah 5, 99 in 202 zahteval, da se pri obravnavi in izvajanju ukrepov za zdravje živali upošteva dobrobit živali.
While the Commission had originally rejected the above-mentioned amendments of the European Parliament, it could accept the Council's and the Parliament's final position as a compromise, which preserves the necessary efficiency, flexibility and legal certainty for the listing and categorisation of diseases and listing of species. 
Čeprav je Komisija zgoraj navedene spremembe Evropskega parlamenta prvotno zavrnila, bi kompromisno lahko sprejela končno stališče Sveta in Parlamenta, s čimer bi se ohranile potrebna učinkovitost, prožnost in pravna varnost za uvrščanje bolezni na seznam in njihovo razvrščanje ter uvrščanje vrst na seznam.
The Council is firm on the separation between animal health and animal welfare and opposes these amendments broadly sharing the Commission views. 
Svet trdno zagovarja ločevanje med zdravjem živali in dobrobitjo živali ter nasprotuje tem spremembam in se tako večinoma strinja z mnenjem Komisije.