natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The qualitative comparison is based on composition, degree of ionization and complete solubility of active substance. 
Primerjava kakovosti temelji na sestavi, stopnji ionizacije in popolni topnosti učinkovine.
The difference in median VAS score was 8 mm at day 3-4 and 4.6mm at day 7-8. 
Mediana vrednost vizualne analogne lestvice (VAS) je bila 3. in 4. dan 8 mm, 7. in 8. dan pa 4,6 mm.
All these studies provide evidence on modest efficacy for authorised topical diclofenac formulations of which the most robust is study Predel 2012 with Emulgel,. 
Vse omenjene študije dokazujejo zmerno učinkovitost odobrenih topičnih formulacij diklofenaka, najzanesljivejša pa je študija emulgela Predel 2012.
The applicant's submissions as part of the referral procedure incorporates literature data and discussions on Quality, Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Efficacy and Clinical Safety aspects. 
Predlagatelj je v okviru napotitvenega postopka predložil podatke iz literature in razprav o kakovosti, klinični farmakologiji, klinični učinkovitosti in klinični varnosti.
The applicant has also reviewed the available published clinical trial literature on topical diclofenac which includes a study on effects of Emulgel on Joint Pain (Predel 2012), study on DHEP (Diclofenac hydroxyethylpyrrolidine plaster), Heparin plaster or placebo plaster (Constantino C et al. 2011) and an uncontrolled study on DHEP gel. 
Predlagatelj je pregledal tudi razpoložljivo objavljeno literaturo o kliničnem preskušanju topičnega diklofenaka, ki vključuje študijo o učinkih emulgela na bolečine v sklepih (Predel 2012), študijo o DHEP (obližu z diklofenak hidroksietilpirolidinom), obližu s heparinom ali obližu s placebom (Constantino C. et al. 2011) in nekontrolirano študijo o gelu DHEP.
The original application in 2000 under Article 4.8 (a) (II) of Directive 65/65/EEC - bibliographic for new pharmaceutical form and strength, was supported with published literature on efficacy of topical diclofenac as well as data from pharmacokinetics and a clinical study (9702 SUV) of the proposed 4% cutaneous spray formulation. 
Prvotni vlogi iz leta 2000 v skladu s členom 4(8)(a)(ii) Direktive 65/65/EGS - bibliografskim podatkom za novo farmacevtsko obliko in jakost, so bili priloženi objavljena literatura o učinkovitosti topičnega diklofenaka ter podatki iz farmakokinetike in klinične študije (9702 SUV) predlagane formulacije 4-odstotnega dermalnega pršila.
However, the systemic exposure is low enough that the adverse event profile seen with oral or other systemically administered NSAIDs is not problematic. 
Sistemska izpostavljenost je vseeno dovolj nizka, da profil neželenega dogodka kot pri peroralnih ali drugih sistemsko danih nesteroidnih protivnetnih zdravilih (NSAID) ni problematičen.
The only intra-study comparative data that is available is from study Martin et al. 1997 which indicated that the systemic absorption is comparable for Spraygel and Emulgel, but a conclusion on equivalence - and clinical relevance of systemic absorption - cannot be drawn. 
Edini razpoložljivi primerjalni podatki znotraj ene študije izhajajo iz študije Martin et al. 1997, ki so pokazali, da je sistemska absorpcija gela v pršilu primerljiva z emulgelom, vendar pa ni mogoče podati zaključkov o enakovrednosti in klinični ustreznosti sistemske absorpcije.
• The Committee was of the view that the totality of data submitted justified the efficacy of the applied medicinal product as well as the bridging to the literature, in particular to existing data on topical diclofenac formulations including Voltarol Emulgel formulations. 
• odbor je menil, da vsi predloženi podatki utemeljujejo učinkovitost uporabljenega zdravila in povezovanje z literaturo, zlati z obstoječimi podatki o topičnih formulacijah diklofenaka, vključno s formulacijami zdravila Voltarol Emulgel.
The application subject to this referral therefore concerns a repeat-use mutual recognition procedure (UK-H-0563-001-E-002) for Diclofenac sodium 4% cutaneous spray, solution (PL 18017/0006) with UK as RMS and which involves Italy, Spain, Germany as Concerned Member States. 
Vloga, ki je predmet te napotitve, zato upošteva postopek ponovne uporabe medsebojnega priznavanja (UK-H-0563-001-E-002) za zdravilo Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 %, dermalno pršilo, raztopina (PL 18017/0006), v katerem je referenčna država članica Združeno kraljestvo, in ki kot zadevne države članice vključuje Italijo, Španijo in Nemčijo.
Most of the data are cross-study comparisons which are affected by different doses and methods and so no robust conclusions can be drawn from these cross-study comparisons. 
Večina podatkov izhaja iz medštudijskih primerjav z različnimi odmerki in potmi uporabe, zato na njihovi podlagi ni mogoče podati trdnih zaključkov.
Day 60 of the CMDh procedure was on 29 March 2018, and since two Member States raised concerns regarding potential serious risk to public health (PSRPH) related to lack of efficacy for the specific 4% spraygel product and inadequate bridging to literature, in particular with other topical diclofenac formulations (including Voltarol Emulgel) for which it was acknowledged that there was adequate evidence of efficacy and safety, the Reference Member State (UK) triggered on 5 April 2018 a referral under Article 29(4) of Directive 2001/83/EC, requesting the CHMP to assess the impact of the objections raised that constitute a potential serious risk to public health. 
Ker sta dve državi članici izrazili zaskrbljenost zaradi možnega resnega tveganja za javno zdravje (PSRPH), povezanega s pomanjkanjem učinkovitosti zadevnega 4-odstotnega gela v pršilu in neustreznega povezovanja z literaturo, zlasti drugimi formulacijami topičnega diklofenaka (vključno z zdravilom Voltarol Emulgel), za katere so bili ugotovljeni zadostni dokazi za učinkovitost in varnost, je referenčna država članica (Združeno kraljestvo) 5. aprila 2018 sprožila napotitveni postopek skladno s členom 29(4) Direktive 2001/83/ES in od odbora CHMP zahtevala, da oceni vpliv izraženih pomislekov, ki predstavljajo možno resno tveganje za javno zdravje.
The plasma and tissue pharmacokinetic (PK) data of SprayGel in healthy volunteers, and patients with acute inflammation, are compared to those of Voltaren Sodium Gel and Voltaren Emulgel. 
Farmakokinetične podatke o gelu v pršilu v plazmi in tkivu zdravih prostovoljcev in bolnikov z akutnim vnetjem so primerjali s podatki o zdravilih Voltaren Sodium Gel in Voltaren Emulgel.
However, the study can be considered supportive of efficacy to infer that Spraygel has beneficial activity in the context of this bibliographic application. 
Kljub temu pa opravljena študija dokazuje učinkovitost, na podlagi katere lahko sklepamo, da je gel v pršilu koristen v okviru bibliografske aplikacije.
The Committee, as a consequence, considers that the benefit-risk balance of Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 % Cutaneous Spray, Solution and associated names is favourable and therefore recommends the granting of the marketing authorisation(s) for the medicinal products referred to in Annex I of the CHMP opinion. 
Odbor zato ocenjuje, da je razmerje med tveganji in koristmi zdravila Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 %, dermalno pršilo, raztopina, in povezanih imen ugodno in zato priporoča izdajo dovoljenja (dovoljenj) za promet z zdravili, navedenimi v Prilogi I k mnenju odbora CHMP.
The CHMP agreed that topical NSAIDs, including Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 %, have a proven safety record over many more than 10 years, which is supported by their low systemic bioavailability compared to e.g. oral pharmaceutical forms. 
Odbor CHMP se je strinjal, da topična nesteroidna protivnetna zdravila (NSAID), vključno z zdravilom Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 %, že več kot deset let veljajo za varna, o čemer priča tudi njihova nizka sistemska biološka razpoložljivost v primerjavi z na primer peroralnimi farmacevtskimi oblikami.
Nevertheless, it is consistently seen across studies that measurable levels of diclofenac have been reported after application of the spraygel both in systemic exposure and topical exposure (subcutaneous tissue and muscle tissue) at the site of action. 
Vseeno pa različne študije dosledno kažejo na to, da po aplikaciji gela v pršilu tako pri sistemski izpostavljenosti kot tudi topični izpostavljenosti (podkožno tkivo in mišično tkivo) poročajo o merljivih koncentracijah diklofenaka na mestu aplikacije.
Therefore the CHMP agreed by majority, that the benefit-risk balance of Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 % is favourable. 
Zato je odbor CHMP z večino sprejel ugotovitev, da je razmerje med tveganji in koristmi zdravila Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 % ugodno.
Nevertheless, while it is acknowledged that the efficacy of Emulgel cannot be directly attributed to Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 %, it is also reasonable to infer that Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 % has a beneficial effect based on the supportive Predel 2013 study, PK comparisons and cross-study comparisons in a similar range as seen for other topical diclofenac products. 
Čeprav je ugotovljeno, da učinkovitosti emulgela ne moremo neposredno pripisati zdravilu Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 %, pa lahko na podlagi podporne študije Predel 2013, farmakokinetičnih primerjav in medštudijskih primerjav utemeljeno sklepamo, da ima zdravilo Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 % koristne učinke v podobnem obsegu kot druga topična zdravila z diklofenakom.
In particular their use and substitution for oral and other systemically administered NSAIDS makes a major contribution to patient well-being in view of the available safety data, which supports a markedly lower risk of potentially serious adverse events compared to systemically administered diclofenac containing products. 
Glede na razpoložljive podatke o varnosti je glavni prispevek k dobremu počutju bolnikov zlasti njihova uporaba in nadomestek za peroralna in druga sistemsko dana nesteroidna protivnetna zdravila (NSAID), s čimer pripomorejo k izrazito manjšem tveganju za morebitne resne neželene dogodke v primerjavi s sistemsko danimi zdravili, ki vsebujejo diklofenak.
Overall summary of the scientific evaluation by the CHMP In summary, when taken together the totality of scientific evidence supports that Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 % has an acceptable safety and efficacy profile. 
Splošni povzetek znanstvenega vrednotenja odbora CHMP Če povzamemo, skupek znanstvenih dokazov potrjuje sprejemljivo varnost in učinkovitost uporabe zdravila Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 %.
Further as the systemic and topical exposure data of Emulgel is available for comparison to Spraygel, the Marketing Authorisation Holder bridged the efficacy of Emulgel to Spraygel based on a cross-study comparison of the efficacy endpoints, which are however confounded by differences in study methods and populations. 
Ker so podatki o sistemski in topični izpostavljenosti pri emulgelu na voljo za primerjavo z gelom v pršilu, je imetnik dovoljenja za promet z zdravilom na podlagi medštudijske primerjave končnih točk učinkovitosti, ki so sicer zavajajoče zaradi razlik v uporabljenih metodah in populacijah, povezal učinkovitost emulgela z učinkovitostjo gela v pršilu.
The Committee considered the available data submitted in support of the use of Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 % Cutaneous Spray, Solution and associated names , which included a comparison of quality aspects in relation to authorised topical diclofenac products, and literature covering pharmacokinetic (local and systemic) as well as efficacy and safety data. 
• odbor je obravnaval vse podatke, ki jih je v povezavi s pomisleki, izraženimi kot možno resno tveganje za javno zdravje, predložil predlagatelj; odbor je obravnaval razpoložljive podatke, predložene v podporo uporabi zdravila Diclofenac Sodium Spray Gel 4 %, dermalno pršilo, raztopina, in povezanih imen, ki so vključevali primerjavo kakovosti v povezavi z odobrenimi zdravili s topičnim diklofenakom ter literaturo, ki obsega tako farmakokinetične (lokalne in sistemske) podatke kot tudi podatke o učinkovitosti in varnosti,
The defined primary endpoint response, expressed as a decrease in swelling of at least 50% during 10 days of treatment for the ‘Full Analysis Set' (FAS), was reached in 87/97 patients treated with diclofenac spray gel (89.7%) compared to 
tj. primarna končna točka, opredeljena kot zmanjšanje otekline za vsaj 50 % v desetih dneh zdravljenja celotne skupine bolnikov (FAS), je bila dosežena pri 87 od 97 bolnikov (89,7 %), zdravljenih z gelom v pršilu, ki vsebuje diklofenak, v primerjavi s 74 od 94 bolnikov (78,7 %), zdravljenih s placebom; p = 0,0292 (en krak) in p = 0,0467 (dva kraka).
Although the strength of the proposed cutaneous spray is 4% as compared to the Emulgel which is 1% or 2%, this difference in the cutaneous spray was designed to deliver a similar amount of diclofenac to local tissues as the Emulgel. 
Jakost predlaganega dermalnega pršila je 4-odstotna, medtem ko je jakost emulgela 1- ali 2-odstotna.
• The recommended dose is one 10 mg tablet each day. 
• Priporočeni odmerek je ena 10 mg tableta vsak dan.
LOCF: Last observation carried forward 
LOCF: Prenos zadnjega opažanja [Last observation carried forward]
Non-inferior to glipizide + metformin p-value < 0.0001 
Neinferiorno glede na glipizid + metformin Vrednost p < 0,0001
glimepiride 4 mg/day; Metformin (immediate- or extended-release formulations) ≥1500 mg/day plus maximum tolerated dose, which must be at least half maximum dose, of a sulphonylurea for at least 8 weeks prior to enrolment. 
Glimepirid 4 mg/dan; Metformin (oblike s takojšnjim ali podaljšanim sproščanjem) ≥ 1500 mg/dan ter največji tolerirani odmerek (ki mora biti vsaj polovičen maksimalni odmerek) sulfonilsečnine vsaj 8 tednov pred zajetjem v študijo.
Combination of a single dose of dapagliflozin 20 mg and simvastatin (a CYP3A4 substrate) resulted in a 19 % increase in AUC of simvastatin and 31 % increase in AUC of simvastatin acid. 
Kombinacija enkratnega odmerka 20 mg dapagliflozina in simvastatina (substrata CYP3A4) je povzročila 19-odstotno povečanje AUC simvastatina in 31-odstotno% povečanje AUC simvastatinske kisline.
The hazard ratio comparing dapagliflozin to comparator was 0.79 (95 % Confidence interval [CI]: 0.58, 1.07), indicating that in this analysis Forxiga is not associated with an increase in cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 
Razmerje ogroženosti z dapagliflozinom v primerjavi s primerjalnim zdravilom je bilo 0,79 (95 % interval zaupanja [IZ]: 0,58; 1,07), kar nakazuje, da v tej analizi zdravilo Forxiga ni bilo povezano s povečanjem kardiovaskularnega tveganja pri bolnikih s sladkorno boleznijo tipa 2.
In a 52-week, active-controlled non-inferiority study (with 52- and 104-week extension periods), Forxiga was evaluated as add-on therapy to metformin compared with a sulphonylurea (glipizide) as add-on therapy to metformin in subjects with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c > 6.5 % and ≤ 10 %). 
V 52-tedenski, z zdravilno učinkovino kontrolirani študiji neinferiornosti (z 52-tedenskim in 104-tedenskim obdobjem podaljšanja), so zdravilo Forxiga ocenjevali kot dodatek k zdravljenju z metforminom v primerjavi s sulfonilsečnino (glipizid) kot dodatkom k zdravljenju z metforminom pri osebah z neustrezno urejenostjo glikemije (HbA1c > 6,5 % in ≤ 10 %).
At 52, 104 and 208 weeks, a significantly lower proportion of subjects in the group treated with dapagliflozin (3.5 %, 4.3 % and 5.0 %, respectively) experienced at least one event of hypoglycaemia compared to the group treated with glipizide (40.8 %, 47.0 % and 50.0 %, respectively). 
52., 104. in 208. teden je imel vsaj eno hipoglikemijo značilno manjši delež oseb, ki so prejemale dapagliflozin (3,5 %, 4,3 % in 5,0 %) v primerjavi s skupino, zdravljeno z glipizidom (40,8 %, 47,0 % in 50,0 %).
Subjects with mean daily insulin dose reduction of at least 10 % (%) 
Osebe z zmanjšanjem povprečnega dnevnega odmerka insulina za vsaj a
Columns 1 and 2, HbA1c analysed using LOCF (see footnote d); Columns 3 and 4, HbA1c analysed using LRM (see footnote e) Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value LOCF: Last observation (prior to rescue for rescued subjects) carried forward LRM: Longitudinal repeated measures analysis p-value < 0.0001 versus placebo + oral glucose-lowering medicinal product(s) 
Stolpca 1 in 2, HbA1c analiziran po metodi LOCF (glejte opombo d), stolpca 3 in 4, HbA1c analiziran z metodo LRM (glejte opombo e) Povprečje najmanjših kvadratov, prilagojeno za izhodiščno vrednost LOCF: Prenos zadnjega opažanja (pred rešilnim zdravljenjem za preiskovance s takšnim zdravljenjem) [Last observation carried forward] eLRM: longitudinalna analiza s ponovljenimi meritvami Vrednost p < 0,0001 v primerjavi s kombinacijo placebo + peroralni antidiabetik/antidiabetiki
Forxiga has not been studied in severe renal impairment (CrCl < 30 ml/min or eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). 
Zdravilo Forxiga ni bilo raziskano pri hudi okvari ledvic (CrCl < 30 ml/min ali eGFR < 30 ml/min/1,73 m 2) ali pri končni odpovedi ledvic (ESRD - end-stage renal disease).
Effect of dapagliflozin on other medicinal products In interaction studies conducted in healthy subjects, using mainly a single-dose design, dapagliflozin did not alter the pharmacokinetics of metformin, pioglitazone, sitagliptin, glimepiride, hydrochlorothiazide, bumetanide, valsartan, digoxin (a P-gp substrate) or warfarin (S-warfarin, a CYP2C9 substrate), or the anticoagulatory effects of warfarin as measured by INR. 
V študijah medsebojnega delovanja pri zdravih preiskovancih, ki so bile v glavnem izvedene po raziskovalnem načrtu z uporabo enkratnega odmerka, dapagliflozin ni spremenil farmakokinetike metformina, pioglitazona, sitagliptina, glimepirida, hidroklorotiazida, bumetanida, valsartana, digoksina (ki je substrat P-gp ) ali varfarina (S-varfarina, ki je substrat CYP2C9 ); prav tako ni spremenil antikoagulantnih učinkov varfarina, merjenih z INR.
Forxiga is not recommended for use in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (patients with CrCl < 60 ml/min or eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2). 
Zdravila Forxiga ni priporočljivo uporabljati pri bolnikih z zmerno do hudo okvaro ledvic (bolnikih s CrCl < 60 ml/min ali eGFR < 60 ml/min/1,73 m 2).
tablet core: microcrystalline cellulose (E460i), anhydrous lactose (see section 2 ‘Forxiga contains lactose'), crospovidone (E1202), silicon dioxide (E551), magnesium stearate (E470b). 
• Druge sestavine zdravila so: jedro tablete: mikrokristalna celuloza (E460i), brezvodna laktoza (glejte poglavje 2 "Zdravilo Forxiga vsebuje laktozo"), krospovidon (E1202), silicijev dioksid (E551), magnezijev stearat (E470b).
HbA1c (%) Baseline (mean) Change from baseline Difference from placebo c 
HbA1c (%) Izhodišče (povprečje) Sprememba od izhodišča Razlika glede na placebo c
See section 4.4 Reported in ≥ 2 % of subjects and ≥ 1 % more and at least 3 more subjects treated with dapagliflozin 10 mg compared to placebo. 
Opisano pri ≥ 2 % preiskovancev ter pri ≥ 1 % več in pri vsaj 3 preiskovancih več med uporabo 10 mg dapagliflozina kot med uporabo placeba.
Forxiga 5 mg film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/001 14 film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/002 28 film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/003 98 film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/004 30 x 1 (unit dose) film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/005 90 x 1 (unit dose) film-coated tablets 
Forxiga 5 mg filmsko obložene tablete EU/1/12/795/001 14 filmsko obloženih tablet EU/1/12/795/002 28 filmsko obloženih tablet EU/1/12/795/003 98 filmsko obloženih tablet EU/1/12/795/004 30 x 1 (enkratni odmerek) filmsko obložena tableta EU/1/12/795/005 90 x 1 (enkratni odmerek) filmsko obložena tableta
Forxiga 10 mg film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/006 14 film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/007 28 film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/008 98 film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/009 30 x 1 (unit dose) film-coated tablets EU/1/12/795/010 90 x 1 (unit dose) film-coated tablets 
Forxiga 10 mg filmsko obložene tablete EU/1/12/795/006 14 filmsko obloženih tablet EU/1/12/795/007 28 filmsko obloženih tablet EU/1/12/795/008 98 filmsko obloženih tablet EU/1/12/795/009 30 x 1 (enkratni odmerek) filmsko obložena tableta EU/1/12/795/010 90 x 1 (enkratni odmerek) filmsko obložena tableta
Dapagliflozin 10 mg 
Monoterapija dapagliflozin 10 mg placebo
(95 % CI) Subjects (%) achieving: HbA1c < 7 % Adjusted for baseline Body weight (kg) Baseline (mean) Change from baseline Difference from placebo c 
(95 % IZ) Preiskovanci (%), ki so dosegli: HbA1c < 7 % Prilagojeno za izhodišče Telesna masa (kg) Izhodišče (povprečje) Sprememba od izhodišča Razlika glede na placebo c
LOCF: Last observation (prior to or on the date of the first insulin up-titration, if needed) carried forward All randomised subjects who took at least one dose of double-blind study medicinal product during the short-term double-blind period Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value and presence of oral glucose-lowering medicinal product p-value < 0.0001 versus placebo + insulin ± oral glucose-lowering medicinal product p-value < 0.05 versus placebo + insulin ± oral glucose-lowering medicinal product Up-titration of insulin regimens (including short-acting, intermediate, and basal insulin) was only allowed if subjects met pre-defined FPG criteria. 
Povprečje najmanjših kvadratov, prilagojeno za izhodiščno vrednost in prisotnost peroralnega antidiabetika Vrednost p < 0,0001 v primerjavi s kombinacijo placeba + insulina ± peroralnega antidiabetika Vrednost p < 0,05 v primerjavi s kombinacijo placeba + insulina ± peroralnega antidiabetika Povečevanje insulinske sheme (vključno s kratkodelujočim, srednjedolgodelujočim in bazalnim insulinom) je bilo dovoljeno le, če so bolniki izpolnjevali vnaprej določena merila glede glukoze v plazmi na tešče.
Forxiga 5 mg film-coated tablets Forxiga 10 mg film-coated tablets 
Forxiga 5 mg filmsko obložene tablete Forxiga 10 mg filmsko obložene tablete
Forxiga 10 mg film-coated tablets 
Forxiga 10 mg filmsko obložene tablete
Forxiga 5 mg film-coated tablets 
Forxiga 5 mg filmsko obložene tablete
Randomised and treated subjects with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value 
Randomizirane in zdravljene osebe z izhodiščno in vsaj še eno poizhodiščno meritvijo učinkovitosti c
LOCF: Last observation (prior to rescue for rescued subjects) carried forward All randomised subjects who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication during the short-term double-blind period Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value p-value < 0.0001 versus placebo Not evaluated for statistical significance as a result of the sequential testing procedure for secondary end points 
Povprečje najmanjših kvadratov, prilagojeno za izhodiščno vrednost Vrednost p < 0,0001 v primerjavi s placebom Ni ocenjeno za statistično značilnost zaradi postopka zaporednega preskušanja za sekundarne opazovane dogodke
Forxiga 5 mg film-coated tablets dapagliflozin 
Forxiga 5 mg filmsko obložene tablete dapagliflozin
Forxiga 10 mg film-coated tablets dapagliflozin 
Forxiga 10 mg filmsko obložene tablete dapagliflozin
Forxiga 5 mg film-coated tablets Each tablet contains dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate equivalent to 5 mg dapagliflozin. 
Forxiga 5 mg filmsko obložene tablete Ena tableta vsebuje dapagliflozin-propandiol monohidrat, kolikor ga ustreza 5 mg dapagliflozina.
Forxiga 10 mg film-coated tablets Each tablet contains dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate equivalent to 10 mg dapagliflozin. 
Forxiga 10 mg filmsko obložene tablete Ena tableta vsebuje dapagliflozin-propandiol monohidrat, kolikor ga ustreza 10 mg dapagliflozina.
Baseline (mean) Change from baseline Difference from placebo c 
Izhodišče (povprečje) Sprememba od izhodišča Razlika v primerjavi s placebom c
Each tablet contains dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate equivalent to10 mg dapagliflozin 
Ena tableta vsebuje dapagliflozin-propandiol monohidrat, kolikor ga ustreza 10 mg dapagliflozina.
Forxiga contains lactose 
Zdravilo Forxiga vsebuje laktozo
inhaler (ABS/PE/PP) 3 inhalers (3 x 60 doses) 
3 inhalatorji (3 x 60 odmerkov)
This summary was last updated in December 2016. 
Povzetek je bil nazadnje posodobljen decembra 2016.
Treatment is once daily. 
Zdravljenje poteka enkrat dnevno.
EMA/261874/2008 EMEA/V/C/000142 
EMEA/261874/2008 EMEA/V/C/000142